Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/02/21 - Agenda PacketTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Dnve ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 15` and 3`d Wednesdays ~ 7 00 P M FEBRUARY 21, 2007 MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS Donald J. Kurth, M D Diane Williams Rex Gutierrez L Dennis Michael Sam Spagnolo CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L Markman Debra J Adams, CMC ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room 5 30 P M REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers 7 00 P M INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ~~ CU~(,AMCONGA TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Counal encourage free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed Comments are to be hmded to five mmutes per indroidual Any handouts far the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Counal meeting LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Counal meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11 00 a m and 7 00 p m The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www arancho-cucamonga ca us/whatsnew htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low- bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service The Agency, Fire Board and City Counal meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7 00 p m m the Counal Chambers located at 10500 Crv~c Center Drrve Members of the City Counal also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board Copies of the agendas and mmutes can be found at http llwww arancho-cucamonga ca us If you need speaal assistance or accommodations to partiapate in this meeting, please ® contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting Is In session REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 2007 A. 5:30 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM 1 Roll Call Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Williams Councilmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION 1 CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 549568 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HERMOSA AVENUE, LINDA D DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY -RDA E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AT 7 00 P M IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 2007 2 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10 00 P M ,UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL 1 Pledge of Allegiance 2 Roll Call Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Williams Counalmembers Gutierrez, Michael and Spagnolo H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1 Introduction of new police officers I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection Distract and Crty Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or Crty Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual J. AGENCY/FIRE BOARD/COUNCIL RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council to respond to comments made by the general public REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 2007 vnwina 3 K. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion 1 Approval of Check Register dated January 31 through February 13, 2007, for the total 1 amount of $803,323 81 2 Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2007 2 3 Approval of an agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and Keyser Marston 14 Associates (RA 07-001) to evaluate the technical financial issues associated with the creation of a workforce housing ordinance and an appropnation of $22,000 ($20,000 plus 10% contingency) to Redevelopment Agency Acct No 2622801-5300 from Fund 622 Reserves 4 Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of Agency records pursuant to California 16 Government Code Section 34090, the Agency's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations RESOLUTION NO RA 07-001 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF AGENCY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion 5 Approval of Minutes December 15, 2006 (specal team-building meeting) January 12 & 13, 2007 (special team-buddinglgoal-setting meeting) January 17, 2007 (regular meeting) 6 Approval of Check Register dated January 31 through February 13, 2007, for the total 21 amount of $99,870 41 7 Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2007 24 8 Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Faalities 28 District No 85-1, Annexation No 06-6 (Runlet Development, Inc - SUBTT18139) REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 2007 RESOLUTION NO FD 07-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, ANNEXATION NO 06-6 9 Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Faalities Distract No 85-1, Annexation No 06-11 (Rancho Plaza Partnership, LLC - APN 0201-811- 56) RESOLUTION NO FD 07-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, ANNEXATION NO 06-11 10 Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No 85-1, Annexation No 06-12 (Bahman Sepehrnia - SUBTT16788) RESOLUTION NO FD 07-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, ANNEXATION NO 06-12 11 Approval of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No 88-1, Annexation No 88-06-1 (Toll Brothers - SUBTT12332-2) RESOLUTION NO FD 07-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 88-1, ANNEXATION NO 88-06-1 12 Approval to adopt a boundary map showing property within SUBTT17455 (KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc ), located on the northeast corner of Madrone Avenue and 9t" Street to be annexed into CFD No 85-1 4 29 32 33 36 37 40 41 44 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 2007 5 RESOLUTION NO FD 07-008 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP (ANNEXATION NO 07-1) SHOWING PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 13 Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No 07-1 (SUBTT17455, KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc ), into Community Facilities District 48 No 85-1, specifying facilities and services provided, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the annexation and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation RESOLUTION NO FD 07-009 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION TO TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO 07-1) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 14 Approval of a Communications Facility Lease Agreement between New Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, dba Verizon Wireless (FD 07-004), and Rancho Cucamonga Fire 59 Protection District for the placement of a Monopine and for installation of a Communication Service Facility at Fire Station No 175, 11108 Banyan Street 15 Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of Fire District records pursuant to 61 California Government Code Section 34090, the District's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations RESOLUTION NO FD 07-010 62 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF DISTRICT RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES K. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any item may be removed by a Counalmember for discussion REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6 _ FEBRUARY 21, 2007 16 Approval of Minutes February 5, 2007 (special meeting re future city parks) 17 Approval of Check Register dated January 31 through February 13, 2007, and payroll 70 ending February 13, 2007, for the total amount of $3,146,726 82 18 Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2007 97 19 Approval of Amendment to the CDBG Budget for Fiscal Year 2006-2007authorizing an 104 appropriation of $101,145 08 to Acct No 1204314-5650-1230-204 for the Home Improvement Program 20 Approval to reject all bids received far the FY 200612007 Local Street Pavement 105 Rehabilitation -Cape Seal of Various Streets as non-responsive to the needs of the City, and approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the FY 2006/2007 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets, to be funded from Proposition 42 RESOLUTION NO 07-042 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 200612007 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 21 Approval to summarily vacate and gwtclaim excess portion of La Grande Street at the 112 southwest corner of Cameo Street by Brian and Dawn Murphy and Bruce Alvarez Related Fde Vacation 205 RESOLUTION NO 07-043 114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUMMARILY VACATION OF EXCESS STREET EASEMENT OF LA GRANDE STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CAMEO STREET, V-205 -APN 202-284-01 & 202-285-07 RESOLUTION NO 07-044 119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT SAID LOT A MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE UNNECESSARY AND RESTRICTIVE AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE THOSE CERTAIN QUITCLAIM DEEDS, COPIES OF WHICH ARE ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A," AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE RECORDED 22 Approval of Amendment No 6 tc the Amended and Restated Lease Agreement between the 126 City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball, Inc ,relating to Annual City Sponsored July 4th Fireworks Show at the Epicenter Stadium REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 2007 23 Approval and execution of Amendment No 2 to SANBAG Contract No 04-052 between the San Bernardino Associated Governments and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for work relating to Route 210 construction 7 129 24 Approval of a Master Plan Transportation Facility Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-50) (CO 132 07-022) for construction of "Backbone" improvements to Jack Benny Drive from Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Channel in connection with development of DRC2003-00732, submitted by the Bates Company RESOLUTION NO 07-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA-50) FOR THE INSTALLATION OF "BACKBONE" IMPROVEMENTS TO JACK BENNY DRIVE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO DAY CREEK CHANNEL 25 Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $3,424,780 55 to the apparent low bidder, Sully-Miller Contracting Company (CO 07-023), for the base bid and all alternatives, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $342,478 05 for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction -Phases II and III, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No 1 1 1 031 6 565011 51 91 1 0-0, Ped Grant Art 3 Funds, Account No 1214303565011519214-0, Park Development Fund, Account No 1 1 203055650/1 51 91 20-0, General Fund, Account No 10013075650/1519001-0, Beautification Fund, Account No 11103165650/1520110-0, Capital Reserves Fund, Account No 1 025001 56 5011 52002 5-0 and BTA Funds, Account No 11923035650/1520192-0 and appropriate additional amounts of $100,000 00 to Account No 11103165650/1519110-0 from Beautification Fund balance, $1,000,000 00 to Account No 1120305565011519120-0 from Park Development Fund balance, $1,167,050 00 to 10013075650/1519001-0 from General Fund balance and $100,00000 to Account No 1110316565011520110-0 from Beautification Fund balance 134 135 26 Approval of a Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-49) (CO 07-024) for traffic signal installation 147 at 4~" Street and Richmond Place, in conjunction with the development of Parcel Map 16300, located north of 4'" Street between Pittsburgh Place and Richmond Place, submitted by Tharaldson Development Company, to be funded from Transportation Acct No 1124303- 5650/1026124-0 RESOLUTION NO 07-046 ~ 150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION (SRA-49) AT THE INTERSECTION OF 4T" STREET AND RICHMOND PLACE 27 Approval of recommendation for the public hearing noticing distance for Protect PRJ2006- 151 00094 (DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, Tentative Tract SUBTT18179) at Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue 28 Approval of Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update 152 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 8 _ FEBRUARY 21, 2007 29 Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No N0558981P in the amount of 166 $109,771 51 for the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, Contract No 05-059 L. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public heanngs at the time of first reading Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial The Agency, Fire Board, or Council wdl act upon them at one time without discussion The City Clerk wdl read the tale Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or Councilmember No Items Submitted M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL 1 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AMENDING ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES 168 FEES AND PROVIDING FEE FLEXIBILITY RESOLUTION NO 07-047 171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO 06-142, AND ADDING AND REVISING CERTAIN ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES FEES RESOLUTION NO 07-048 175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES DIRECTOR TO TEMPORARILY LOWER CERTAIN FEES APPLICABLE TO THE CARE AND DISPOSITION OF ANIMALS WITHIN THE CITY 2 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE DRC2006-00916 - PITASSI 230 ARCHITECTS - Review of proposed Housing Incentive Agreement to implement Development Review DRC2005-01060 by modifying certain development standards for the construction of 40 workforce apartment units on vacant property in Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue - APN 0207-254-67 and 68 Related files Development Review DRC2005-01060 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 9 _ FEBRUARY 21, 2007 RESOLUTION NO 07-049 313 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT DRC2006-00916, TO IMPLEMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060 BY MODIFYING CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 40 WORKFORCE APARTMENT UNITS ON THE VACANT PROPERTY IN MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14- 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE EXISTING RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE - APN 0207-254-67 AND 68, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF N. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements No Items Submitted O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements 1 DISCUSSION OF POLITICAL SIGN ORDINANCE 359 P. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the Crty Council for discussion 1 COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councdmember ) 2 DISCUSSION OF GARAGE/YARD SALE REGULATIONS 365 3 PRESENTATION BY VERIZON ON PROPOSED "FIBER TO THE PREMISES" (FTTPI PROJECT AND RELATED "FIGS" SERVICES (Oral) 4 DISCUSSION OF FREEDOM'S FLAME PLAZA 367 5 UPDATE ON NAVIGATIONAL TRACKING SYSTEMS 395 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 10 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING R. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J Adams, City Clerk of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 15, 2007, seventy-two (72) hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code 54954 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check ReP.ister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247251 1/31/2007 ALPHA-G CONSULTING 1,500 00 AP - 00247321 1/31/2007 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION 1,500 00 AP - 00247321 1/31/2007 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION 50,373 75 AP - 00247321 1/31/2007 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION 565 90 AP - 00247322 1/31/2007 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 125,782 50 AP - 00247323 1/31/2007 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 64,896 76 AP - 00247334 1/31/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 51,038 37 AP - 00247338 1/31/2007 DEMCO INC 39 51 AP - 00247363 1/31/2007 GAYLORD BROTHERS 1,098 50 AP-00247366 1/31/2007 GRAINGER 44128 AP - 00247366 1/31/2007 GRAINGER 441 28 AP - 00247366 1/31/2007 GRAINGER 882 56 AP - 00247366 1/31/2007 GRAINGER 822 14 AP - 00247375 1/31/2007 HAMPTON, ELWOOD C 460 00 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 116 92 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 22 37 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 18 30 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 64 93 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 12 85 AP - 00247456 1/31/2007 PENWAL INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED 125,616 49 AP - 00247465 1/31/2007 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 26,859 63 AP - 00247482 1/31/2007 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 181 77 AP - 00247484 1/31/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 915 00 AP - 00247555 1/31/2007 US POSTMASTER 160 00 AP - 00247604 2/7/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 61 78 AP - 00247604 2/7/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 40 83 AP - 00247619 2/7/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION ] 8,088 21 AP - 00247619 2/7/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -1,808 82 AP - 00247636 2/7/2007 CHEW, LAW OFFICES OF RONALD H 136,498 00 AP - 00247692 2/7/2007 HEARST CORPORATION, THE 24 00 AP - 00247703 2/7/2007 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 82,760 02 AP - 00247706 2/7/2007 ISEC INC 17,273 00 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 20 AP - 00247739 2/7/2007 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B 8,116 23 AP - 00247739 2/7/2007 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B -811 62 AP - 00247757 2/7/2007 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP 5,339 48 AP - 00247761 2/7!2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2,560 69 AP - 00247847 2/12/2007 INLAND EMPIRE HOMES 80,400 00 Total for Check ID AP: 803,323 81 Total for Entity: 803,323 81 P1 User: VLOPEZ - Veromca Lopez Page: 1 Current Dale: 02/14/200 Report•CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Reg~s[er Pomait Layout Time: 14 O1 3 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Investments Par Value Market Value Book Value % of PoMolio Term Days to Maturity YTM 360 Equly YTM J65 Equiv Local Agency Investment Fund 35 021 904 02 35 021 904 02 35 021 904 02 23 ib 1 1 5 085 5 156 Commeraal Paper- Discount 15,000,000 00 14,899 229 17 14 899 229 17 9 84 46 22 5 255 5 326 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 98,500,000 00 97,026,127 49 98,445,975 00 65 04 1,481 331 3 194 3 239 Treasury Securities -Coupon 3,000 000 00 2,983,125 00 2,991,328 13 1 96 1 070 103 3 184 3 229 151,521,904 02 149,930,385 68 151,358,436 32 100 00% 989 220 3 835 3 868 Investments Cash Pa55book/Checkmg 295 575 39 295,575 39 295 575 39 1 1 0 493 0 500 (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 151,817,479 41 150,225,961 07 151,654,011 71 989 220 3 635 3 888 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Pascal Year To Date Cu«ent Year 483,086 69 2,568,715 94 Average Daily Balance 150,270,767 99 125,852,573 39 Effective Rate of Return 3 79 % 3 47°/ I certify that this report accurately reflects all Agency pooled Investments and is in conformRy with the Investment policy adopted December 20, 2006 A copy of the investment policy Is avatlable m the Administrative Services Department The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC) -Interactive Data Corporation pncmg service The attached Summary of RDA 2001 & 2004 Taz Allocation Bonds as of current month end and Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end Is provided under the City offcial Investment Policy The provisionsnof the Individual bond documents govern the management of these funds L~`~/L ~ j~t~ dJ ~ ~y, aoo ~ Linda D Darnels, Acting Treasurer Reporting period O1I01/2007-01I31I2007 Run Oale 021132007 -17 25 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymReOi 6 41 202E Report Ver 500 -1J N Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments January 31, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP InvestmentN Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Mootly's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund 575145 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal and Average J6,203,498 84 35,021,904 02 35,021,904 02 35 021 904 02 35 021 904 02 5 156 5 085 1 35,021,90402 35,021,90402 5085 Commercial Paper - Discount 36959JPD9 962 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 36959J063 963 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 90262DPP4 964 UBS FINANCE Subtotal and Average 11,515,797 05 01/04/2007 5,000,000 00 01/10/2007 5 000,000 00 01/10/2007 5000,00000 15,000,000 00 4,971,11111 4971,11111 5200 5230 12 02/13/2007 4 960,201 39 4 960 201 39 5 210 5 252 33 03/06/2007 4 967 916 67 4,967 916 67 5 250 5 284 22 02/23/2007 14,899,22917 14,899,229 17 5 255 22 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 313310K55 904 313310M79 911 313310N78 913 313310705 924 31331TND9 927 31331TWH0 935 31331TWJ6 936 31331TG62 942 31331TU25 952 31339XJJ4 916 31339XPL2 917 31339YDH2 918 31339YHG0 920 3133%4087 937 3133%4%F3 938 3133XAR25 955 3133XAMW4 957 3128X1BD8 903 3128X1JD0 914 3128XiJN8 915 3128X2LY9 930 3728X2577 940 3128X38F9 941 3128X3FC2 945 3128X3FZ1 946 3136F3TY2 906 Run Dale 02/1312007 -17 25 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2000,00000 194812500 199750000 3120 3104 473 05/19/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 3 000,000 00 2 923 125 00 3,000 000 00 3 210 3 166 488 06/03/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 5 000,000 00 4 984 375 00 5 000 000 00 2 440 2 407 36 03/09/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/13/2003 3 000,000 00 2 965 312 50 2,995 312 50 3 050 3 049 193 08/13/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 4,000 000 00 3,935,000 00 4,000,000 00 3 970 3 916 502 06/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 2,00000000 1,956,25000 2000,00000 3240 3196 410 03/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 3,000,00000 291843750 299812500 3550 3517 655 11/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3 000,000 00 2 939 062 50 2 982 000 00 3 920 4 012 634 10/27/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 2 000 000 00 1 978,750 00 2,000 000 00 4 000 3 945 312 12/10/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/12/2003 7 000 000 00 6,934 375 00 7 000,000 00 2 650 2 614 130 06/11/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/26/2003 5,000,000 00 4 909 375 00 5 000 000 00 2 450 2 417 237 09/26/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/16/2003 2,000,000 00 1 987 500 00 2,000 000 00 2 205 2 175 74 04/16/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/16/2003 2 000,000 00 1 988 750 00 2,000 000 00 2 540 2 506 74 04/16/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/26/2004 2 000 000 00 1,955 000 00 2 000,000 00 4 000 3945 784 03/2fi/2009 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 2 000 000 00 1 968 125 00 2 000,000 00 3 500 3 453 330 12/28/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 4 000,000 00 3 936 250 00 4,000 000 00 4 080 4 024 564 08/18/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 4 000,000 00 3 948 750 00 3 999 000 00 4 000 3 954 386 02/22/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/19/2003 5 000 000 00 4 881 320 19 4,993 750 00 3 500 3 479 473 05/19/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 08/12/2003 3,000 000 00 2 915 022 13 2,999 100 00 3 030 2 995 498 06/11/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 06/12/2003 2,000 000 00 1,979,324 O4 2 000,000 00 2 400 2 367 130 06/11/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 01/30/2004 2,000,00000 1,982,55402 2,000,00000 3500 3452 179 07/30/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/19/2004 2 000 000 00 1 966 937 87 1 997 600 00 2 920 2 916 260 10/19/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/26/2004 2 000,000 00 1,971,203 92 2 000 000 00 3 280 3 235 267 10/26/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/24/2004 3 000,000 00 2,963,627 93 2 999,062 50 3 750 3 708 295 11/23/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/26/2004 3 000,000 00 2,953 949 89 2 993 700 00 4 000 4 002 477 05123/2008 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/21/2003 4,500,000 00 4,463,437 50 4,496 625 00 2 625 2 609 109 05/21/2007 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRepi 6 41 202b -O W Report Ver 500 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments January 31, 2007 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Inves[ment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Dale Federal Agency Issues • Coupon 3136F3VQ6 909 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/27/2003 6,000 000 00 5,945,625 00 5 997 000 00 2 500 2 479 113 05/25/2007 3136F3O82 919 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/16/2003 2,000,000 00 1 975,000 00 2 000,000 00 2 500 2 466 165 07/16/2007 3136F5GP0 934 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/16/2004 3 000 000 00 2,933 437 50 3,000,000 00 4 040 3 985 774 03/16/2009 3136FSPB1 939 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 2 000 000 00 1,969 375 00 2,000,000 00 3 020 2 979 253 10/12/2007 3136F6YO6 956 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/22/2005 4,000 000 00 3,948,750 00 3,997,200 00 4 000 3 970 386 02/22/2008 Subtotal and Average 98,445,97500 98,500,00000 97,026,12749 98,445,97500 3194 331 Treasury Secunties • Coupon 912828CG3 951 TREASURY NOTE Subtotal and Average 2,991,328 13 06/09/2004 3 000 000 00 2 983 125 00 2,991 328 13 3 125 3,000,00000 2,983,12500 2,991,32813 Total and Average 150,270,767 99 Run Date 02/1312007 - 17 25 151,521,904 02 149,930,365 68 151,358,436 32 3 164 103 05/15/2007 3184 103 3 835 220 Portfolio RDA CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep1641 2025 ~ A Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Cash January 37, 2007 Page 4 Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to CUSIP Investmenl# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Ra[e Mootly's 360 Matunty SavingslMlscellaneous Accounts SY5144 144 BANK OF AMERICA 295,575 39 295,575 39 295 575 39 0 500 0 493 7 Average Balance 0 00 1 Total Cash and Investments 150,270,767 99 151,617,d79 41 150,225,961 07 151,654,011 71 Run Dale 021131200]-1]25 J 835 220 Portfolio RDA CP PM IPRF_PM2)SymRep1641202b ~ Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Portfolio Management Activity By Type January 1, 2007 through January 31, 2007 Beginning Statetl Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending CUSIP Investmen[# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 5 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS145 145 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5 156 524,596 42 5 500,000 00 Subtotal 39,997,307 60 524,596 42 5,500,000 00 35,021,904 02 SavingslMtsceilaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SY5144 144 BANK OF AMERICA 0 500 0 00 825 213 37 Subtotal 1,120,788 76 0 00 825,213 37 295,575 39 Commercial Paper -Discount 36959JPD9 962 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 5200 01/04/2007 4,971,11111 000 36959J063 963 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 5210 01/10/2007 4,960,20139 000 90262DPP4 964 UOS FINANCE 5250 01/10/2007 4,967,91667 000 Subtotal 0 00 14,899,229 17 0 00 14,899,229 17 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon Subtotal 98,445,975 00 98,445,975 00 Treasury Secunhes -Coupon Subtotal 2,991,328 13 2,991,328 13 Total 142,555,39949 15,423,82559 6,325,21337 151,654,01171 Portfolio RDA CP Run Date 01/131200] -1] 25 PM (PRF_PM3) SymRepl 6 41 20~ ~ Report Var 500 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended December 31, 2006 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Paving Agent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value 96 Housing Set-Aside Tax Bank of New York Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2002 N/A` 4 84% $ 206 47 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/30/2006 N/A' 4 85% 214 40 Housing Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 3/12/2002 N/A' 4 00% 0 50 $ 421 37 Ot Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/22/2001 N/A' 4 50% $ 7,482,955 35 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A` 4 48% 2 69 Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A' 4 48% 468 74 Speaal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 9/30/2005 N/A' 4 53% 1,015 92 $ 7,484,442 70 99 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 2/28/2005 N/A' 4 56% $ 284 79 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N!A` 4 50% 533 36 Special Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 9/30/2005 N/A' 4 53% 817 41 $ 1,63556 04 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Wells Fargo Reserve Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 3/31/2004 N/A' 5 07% $ 12,938,491 70 Interest Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 2/28/2005 N/A' 4 52% 973 32 Principal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 8/31/2005 N/A` 4 52% 839 93 Speaal Fund Federated Treasury Obligations 9/30/2005 N/A` 4 50% 343,797 05 $ 13,284,102 00 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 20,770,601 63 `Note These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand V RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfollo Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2007 Par Market Investments value value City of Rancho Cucamonga Book % of Days to YTM VTM Value Portfollo Term Maturity 360 Equiv 365 Equrv Local Agency Investment Fund 21,131 50 21,131 50 21 131 50 0 09 1 1 5 085 5 156 CommerGal Paper Discount 14 300 000 00 14,205 053 O6 14 205 053 O6 61 16 46 33 5 240 5 313 Fetleral Agency Issues -Coupon 9 000 000 00 8 957 142 33 8,998,593 75 38 75 1,369 57 2 352 2 385 23,321,131 50 23,183,326 69 23,224,776 31 100 00 % 558 42 4 121 4 178 Investments Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 78,049 35 429,536 43 Average Daily Balance 23,443,238 34 25,003,082 63 Effective Rate of Return 3 92°/, 2 92% This report accurately reflects the investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Pro)ect 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds in accordance with the Agency's supplemental indenture dated August 1, 2001 The Investment Program herein shown provides sufflaent cash flow liquidity to meet the public improvements schedule and funding requirements Reporting period 0110112007-0113112007 Run Date 021131200] - 17 35 Portfolio TAB CP PM iPRF_PM1)SymRep1641202b ~ Report Ver 500 ~ RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments January 31, 2007 Page Z Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SY5101 101 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 21,13150 2113150 2113150 5156 5156 1 Subtotal and Average 21,044 56 21,131 50 21,131 50 21,131 50 5156 1 Commercial Paper Discount 369597063 118 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 01/10/2007 780000000 7,737,91417 7,737,91417 5210 5325 33 03/06/2007 369597063 119 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 01/30/2007 6 500,000 00 6 467 138 89 6 467 138 89 5 200 5 299 33 03/06/2007 Subtotal and Average 12,410,696 80 14,700,000 00 14,205,053 O6 14,205,053 O6 5 313 33 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 3128X10G 114 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP 06/30/2003 9,000,000 00 8,957,142 33 8,998,593 75 2 380 2 385 57 03/30/2007 Subtotal antl Average 11,011,496 98 9,000,000 00 8,957,142 J3 8,998,593 75 2 385 57 Total antl Average 23,443,238 34 Run Date 02113/2007 -17 35 23,321,13150 23,183,32689 27,224,77831 4178 42 Portfolio TAB CP PM (PRF_PM21 SymRep1641202b ~ Report Ver 500 CUSIP Investment# Issuer RDA 2001 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Activity By Type January 1, 2007 through January 31, 2007 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Balance Rate Date or Deposits Page 3 Redemptions Entling or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS101 101 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 5156 24500 000 Subtotal 20,88650 24500 000 21,13150 Commercial Paper Discount 36959JNW9 117 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 5200 01/30/2007 000 695045556 36959J063 118 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 5210 01/10/2007 7737,91417 000 36959J063 119 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 5200 01/30/2007 6,467,13889 000 Subtotal 6,950,45556 14,205,05306 6,950,45556 14,205,05306 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 31339Y4X7 115 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2 350 01/09/2007 0 00 7 800 000 00 Subtotal 16,798,593 75 0 00 7,800,000 00 8,998,593 75 Total 23,769,93581 14,205,29806 14,750,45556 23,224,77831 ftun Daie 02/1312007 17 35 Portfolio TAB CI "O PM (PRF_PM3) SymRep1641 202 ~ Report Ver 500 Investments City of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Book %of Days to YTM VTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv 365 Equiv Local Agency Investment Funtl 141 471 18 141,471 18 141,471 18 0 19 1 1 5 085 5 156 Investment Agreements 45 188,077 00 45 188 077 00 45,188 077 00 60 57 939 57 3 112 3 155 Investment Agreements 29,200,540 00 29,280,540 00 29,280540 00 3924 939 57 2673 2710 74,610,088 18 74,610,086 18 74,610,068 18 100 00°/ 937 57 2 943 2 984 Investments To[al Earnings January 31 Month Endrng Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 187,108 94 1,305,628 00 Average Dally Balance 74,677,170 32 74,873,669 22 Effective Rate of Return 2 95% 2 96% This report accurately reflects the Investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Protect 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds proceeds In accordance with the Agency's supplemental Indenture dated March 31, 2004 The Investment Program herein shown provides sufflaent cash Flow liquidity to meet the public Improvements schedule and funding requirements RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2007 Reporting period 0110112007-0113112007 Portfolio TAB4 CP Run Dale 02/132007-17 36 PM IPRF_PMtt SymRep1641202b ~ Rayon Ver 500 ~ RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Portfollo Details -Investments January 31, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Slated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SY5401 401 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 141 471 18 141 471 18 141,471 16 5156 5156 1 Subtotal and Average 208,553 32 141,471 18 141,471 18 141,471 16 5 156 1 Investment Agreements SYS402 402 FSA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE 09/02/2004 45,188,077 00 45,188,077 00 45 188 077 00 3 155 3 155 57 03/30/2007 Subtotal and Average 45,188,077 00 45,188,077 00 45,188,077 00 45,188,1177 00 3 155 57 Investment Agreements SY5404 403 IXIS CAPITAL MARKETS 09/02/2004 29,280 540 00 29,280,540 00 29 280,540 00 2 710 2 710 57 03/30/2007 Subtotal and Average 29,280,540 00 29,280,540 00 29,260,540 00 29,280,540 00 2 710 57 Total and Average 74,677,170 32 Run Daie 02113/2007 - A 36 74,610,088 18 74,610,088 18 74,610,088 18 2 984 57 Portfollo TA84 CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapl6 41 202b ~ N Rapon Ver 500 RDA 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds Portfolio Management Activity By Type January 1, 2007 through January 31, 2007 Beginning Staled Transaction Purchases Redemp0ons Entling CUSIP Inves[men[# Issuer Balance Rate Dale or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 3 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SY5401 401 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 5158 5,67760 306,00000 Subtotal 441,793 58 6,677 60 306,000 00 141,471 18 Investment Agreements Subtotal 66,188,077 00 45,188,077 00 Investment Agreements Subtotal 29,280,540 00 29,260,540 00 Total 74,910,410 58 Run Daie 02113200] 17 36 6,677 60 306,000 00 74,610,08818 Portfolio TA84 C ~ PM (PRF PM3)SymRep16412V W Report Ver 500 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A R E D E V E L O P M E N T A G E N C l Staff Report DATE: February 21, 2007 TO: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Dlrector FROM: Linda D Daniels, Redevelopment Dlrector BY: Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES TO EVALUATE THE TECHNICAL FINANCIAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CREATION OF A WORKFORCE HOUSING ORDINANCE AND AN APPROPIATION OF $22,000 ($20,000 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCOUNT 2622801-5300 FROM FUND 622 RESERVES RECOMMENDATION The Housing Subcommittee recommends approval of an agreement with Keyser Marston Associates to provide technical services needed to evaluate a proposed Workforce Housing Ordinance It Is further recommended that the Agency approve an appropriation from Redevelopment Agency Fund 622 Reserves to Agency Account 2622801-5300 to provide funding for the services BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In a July 2006 workshop, the Housing Subcommittee discussed with the Clty Council the Subcommittee's recommendation that a Workforce Housing Ordinance be considered to further efforts to provide housing affordable to families that live and work in Rancho Cucamonga The Clty Council unanimously supported continued discussions on possible Implementation, and Identified Initial policies and standards that could be considered The Council directed staff and Agency counsel to begin researching the process and framework of such an ordinance P14 P15 Over the past several months, Agency counsel and staff have been reviewing Ordinances recently adopted in other municipalities and interviewing cities on their processes and implementation During these interviews, the services of a financial advisor were identified as critical in identifying financial impacts used to determine percentages of required units and appropriate fees to be established The firm of Keyser Marston has extensive experience in working with developers, land owners, and the Building Industry Association to determine needs specific to each city, and has been highly recommended by neighboring cities Using the initial policies and standards recommended by the City Council during the July workshop, Keyser Marston Associates proposes the following services • Technical analysis to evaluate the financial impact created by the percentage of units, and income affordability restrictions discussed during the workshop • Technical analysis to quantify a proposed in-lieu fee payment and recommended method of calculation Upon approval of the Agreement, the consultant is prepared to begin the technical analysis and present findings within 45-days Once the report has been completed, Agency counsel will begin drafting the proposed framework of the Ordinance for review by the Housing Subcommittee and City Council Upon approval of the initial framework by the Subcommittee and Council, staff will begin meeting with the local development community and Building Industry Association to gather their input pnor to the final Ordinance submitted to the City Council for approval Respectfully submitted, Linda D Daniels Redevelopment Director 2- >_'~ ~ ~' k #h, T H E C I T Y O F _ R A N C H O C U C A M O N~G A - REDEVELOPMENT A~G E N C Y Staff Report DATE: February 21, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director FROM: Carrie Pincott, Records Coordinator SUBJECT: Destruction of Agency Records RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Agency approve the attached Resolution authorizing the destruction of Agency records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the Agency's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The records m the attached destruction requests have met their regwred retention as listed m the Agency's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final disposition The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representative, the Department Head and the Agency Counsel P16 CAP (Attachments as noted) P17 RESOLUTION NO. RA 07- ©O' A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF AGENCY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain Redevelopment Agency records have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes, and WHEREAS, said Agency records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy, and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the Agency Counsel, NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve as follows SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof P18 Resolution No RA 07-"` Page 2 SECTION 2: That the Agency Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be m full force and effect PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J Kurth, M D ,Mayor ATTEST: Debra J Adams, CMC, Agency Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of said Agency held on the Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, Califorrna Debra J. Adams, CMC, Agency Secretary P19 Resolution No RA 07-*" Page 3 EXHIBIT `A' Records Destruction Authorizations for the following Departments /Divisions Redevelopment Agency P20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents (To be processed with the Dec , 2006 seem-annual destmchon Sign, date and return to the Records Drviston by November 9, 2006 Do not destroy listed records wml notified by the Records Coordinator that approval was granted ) Department Redevelopment Aeency (50101 Requestor Linda Darnels I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed These records have not been stored m the Gty's Records Center, and, as such, aze not listed m the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage), therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process Descnption of Records /Documents (include Begmmng and Ending (hiclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records /Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020 1 -Genera] Correspondence Calendar Yeaz 2004 2050 2 - Depf1 Budget ~x/orkmg Papers Calendar Year 2004 4010 3 -Special Distract Formation Records All that were eapired/completed/termmated prior to 1/1/1997 (after scanning) Department Approval Signahue Date City Attorney Approval Signature Date Council Approval Date /Resolution # Destroyed by Signature Date RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 54 00 AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 45 40 AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 2 00 AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 40 OS AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 246 45 AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 226 64 AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 67 95 AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 209 27 AP - 00247248 1/31/2007 AIRGAS WEST 40 OS AP - 00247249 1 /31/2007 ALL CITIES TOOLS 77 88 AP - 00247250 1/31/2007 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 414 84 AP - 00247250 1/31/2007 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 158 66 AP - 00247260 1/31/2007 APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 1,032 75 AP - 00247291 1/31/2007 CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE OF ARSON INVEST] 55 00 AP - 00247296 1/31/2007 CARNES, SANDY 210 00 AP - 00247315 1/31/2007 COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSOC OF C 30 00 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 145 12 AP - 00247352 1/31/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 780 44 AP - 00247353 1/3]/2007 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 688 00 AP - 00247360 1/31/2007 G T ENGINEERING 209 34 AP - 00247361 1/31/2007 GALLS INC 491 99 AP - 00247367 1/31/2007 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 53 20 AP - 00247367 1/31/2007 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 122 96 AP - 00247367 1/31/2007 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 674 12 AP - 00247400 1/31/2007 KME FIRE APPARATUS 63 62 AP - 00247401 1/31/2007 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 54 90 AP - 00247402 1/31/2007 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 860 94 AP - 00247413 1/31/2007 LIFE ASSIST INC 824 26 AP - 00247415 1/31/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 623 55 AP - 00247415 1/31/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 460 95 AP - 00247415 1/31/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 330 36 AP - 00247415 1/31/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 298 24 AP - 00247415 1/31/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 109 85 AP - 00247415 1/31/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 109 85 AP - 00247415 1/31/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 710 93 AP - 00247415 1/31/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 679 34 AP - 00247416 1/31/2007 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 4 33 AP - 00247417 1/31/2007 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC 3,281 42 AP - 00247422 1/31/2007 MALLORY CO 937 44 AP - 00247422 1/31/2007 MALLORY CO 156 24 AP - 00247422 1/31/2007 MALLORY CO 145 47 AP - 00247425 1/31/2007 MANTEK 656 69 AP - 00247425 1/31/2007 MANTEK 645 53 AP - 00247436 1/31/2007 MONTEREY PARK, CITY OF 165 00 AP - 00247440 1/31/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 7 53 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 27 91 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 44 24 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 291 19 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 141 25 AP - 00247449 1/31/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 593 40 AP - 00247449 1/31/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 340 24 AP - 00247449 1/31/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 329 17 AP - 00247484 1/31/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 789 00 AP - 00247493 1/31/2007 SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 7 50 P21 User. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date. 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrau Layout Time: 14 04 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P2p Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247494 1/31/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 343 00 AP - 00247506 1/31/2007 SMART AND FINAL 44 34 AP - 00247506 1/31/2007 SMART AND FINAL 354 00 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 867 30 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 488 20 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,482 ]0 AP - 00247516 1/3 ]/2007 SPARTAN CHASSIS INC 570 42 AP - 00247525 1/31/2007 STONE, STACEY 375 00 AP - 00247528 1/31/2007 SUN BADGE CO 118 79 AP - 00247533 1/31/2007 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 195 95 AP - 00247536 1/31/2007 TOLL, RICHARD 404 95 AP - 00247546 1/31/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54 07 AP - 00247559 1/31/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 74 O1 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 29 90 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 536 98 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 61 77 AP - 00247567 1/31/2007 WALKER, JANET 20 00 AP - 00247567 1/31/2007 WALKER, JANET IS 00 AP - 00247567 1/31/2007 WALKER, JANET 51 94 AP - 00247567 1/31/2007 WALKER, JANET 7 27 AP - 00247567 1/3 ]/2007 WALKER, JANET 24 00 AP - 00247567 1/31/2007 WALKER, JANET 8 00 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 13 23 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 13 23 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 13 23 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 26 38 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 26 38 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 13 06 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 122 29 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 122 28 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 122 28 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 244 57 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 244 57 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 122 28 AP - 00247591 2/7/2007 AIRGAS WEST 311 12 AP - 00247627 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 47,607 87 AP - 00247644 2/7/2007 CORONA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION 2,800 00 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 261 39 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 524 00 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137 74 AP - 00247649 2/7/2007 CUTTERS EDGE 69 42 AP - 00247650 2/7/2007 DANGRA INC 156 90 AP - 00247663 2/7/2007 EPSTEIN, SHAWN 462 23 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 280 80 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,089 38 AP - 00247671 2/7/2007 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 877 00 AP - 00247684 2/7/2007 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 187 64 AP - 00247684 2/7/2007 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY 9 06 AP - 00247696 2/7/2007 HOSE MAN INC 48 97 AP - 00247697 2/7/2007 HOYT LUMBER CO SM 16 17 AP - 00247715 2/7/2007 KME FIRE APPARATUS 294 Ol AP - 00247715 2/7/2007 KME FIRE APPARATUS 194 24 AP - 00247724 2/7/2007 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 328 73 AP - 00247727 2/7/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 234 45 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register PornarT Layout Time: 14 04 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P23 Aeenda Check Reetster 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247727 2/7/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 121 95 AP - 00247727 2/7/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 7,400 83 AP - 00247727 2/7/2007 LN CURTIS AND SONS 1,344 28 AP - 00247732 2/7/2007 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 460 49 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 335 89 AP - 00247750 2/7/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 92 64 AP - 00247750 2/7/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 92 64 AP - 00247750 2/7/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 167 83 AP - 00247750 2/7/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 17 23 AP - 00247771 2/7/2007 PERDUE AND ASSOCIATES, LEN 2,500 00 AP - 00247775 2/7/2007 PIT STOP EMBROIDERY AND SCREEN PRINT 45 26 AP - 00247780 2/7/2007 QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 232 20 AP - 00247786 2/7/2007 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 330 81 AP - 00247800 2/7/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 464 69 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 641 36 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130 66 AP - 00247833 2/7/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 592 07 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 464 40 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 464 40 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 464 40 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 464 40 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 21 49 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 21 48 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 28 98 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 28 98 AP - 00247845 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 47 35 AP - 00247845 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 18 29 AP - 00247845 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 7 07 Total for Check H) AP• 99,870 41 Total for Entity: 99,870 41 User VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date• 02/14/200 ReporLCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time. 14 04 1 z 'i ~~ ~~ ., . ^., .~ N N w N • r•r 4~ H N N w O M L a L .. .O .~ Z? Z Q V .~ L W O m Z Ri i O L~ ~2 z 'i ~~ ~~ ~_ a ~, V ~_ V ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N V ~ ~ O ~ ~ t a.. ._ +.• __ d ~ N .~ i V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •- N N L ~_ ._ O L o a N 3 y- O .~ t0 .a O L W N .a C N d ~ V ~ d ~ ~ .C~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ _ ~ ~ ~ V O '~ 7 N v O O i ~ O O K +~ G1 +~ ~- ~ _A ~ ~ O ~..r x .~ w a .~ .~ a h w 0 N .,.y ._ w a .~ ^ ^ ^ L ^~ L o a~ ~ ~- ~ W Z ~ ~ ~ O ~ . .~- .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o a~ o0 ~ ~ a, z z ~ a 0 ~~ ~~ L O r..~ 0 .~ V .~ L V ~ 0 c~ ~ t .,... _ .~ ~ .~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ,~ ,~ i ~ ._ ~ - o L v a . . .~ L c~ 0 a~ -~ 0 m V ~V L L = a~ s ~ ~ o ~ `~ ~ ~ o ° ~ o _ ~ o _ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ O ~3 ~ ~ ~ w Q R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Investments Par Value Market Value Book Value % of Portfolio Term Days to Maturity YTM 360 Equrv YTM 765 Equly Local Agency Investment Fund 7 149 562 18 7 149,562 18 7 149 562 18 62 33 1 1 5 085 5 156 Passbook/Checking Accounts 321 525 99 321 525 99 321 525 99 2 80 1 1 0 493 0 500 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 4,000,000 00 3 985,714 11 3 999 531 25 34 87 1,088 49 3 078 3 121 11,471,086 17 11,456,802 28 11,470,619 42 100 00% 380 18 4 257 4 316 Investments Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fscal Year To Date _ _ Current Year 42,138 67 211,353 72 - Average Daily Balance 11,398,939 26 8,712,101 17 Effective Rate of Return 4 35°/ 4 12% I certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled Investments and is In conformity with the Investment pollcy adopted December 20, 2006 A copy of the investment pollcy is available in the Administrative Services Department The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash Oow ligwdity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures The attached State of California Pooled Money Investment Account (LAIF) atement is provided under the City and State official Investment Policy and represents the monthly source of valuation for the prior month's end Linda Daniels, Acting Treasurer Reporting penod 0110112007-0113112007 Run Date 02/1412007 - 11 01 Podfolio FIRE CP PM (PRF_PMi l fiymRepi 6 41 202b Report Var 500 "t7 N A R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Portfollo Details -Investments January 31, 2007 Page 2 Average Purcnase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 7149,56218 714956218 7,149,56218 5156 5085 1 Subtotal and Average 7,241,22522 7,149,56218 7,149,56218 7,149,56218 5085 1 Passbook/Checking Accounts SY50002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal antl Average 158,162 78 321 525 99 321 525 99 321,525 99 0 500 J21,52599 321,52599 321,52599 0 493 1 0 493 1 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 3133XFUP9 1004 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/28/2006 1 000 000 00 1,000 000 00 1,000 000 00 5 330 5 257 27 02/28/2007 3128X1OG5 1002 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP 06/30/2003 3,000 000 00 2 965 714 11 2,999,531 25 2 380 2 352 57 03/30/2007 Subtotal and Average 3,999,531 25 4,000,000 00 3,985,714 11 3,999,531 25 J 078 49 Total and Average 11,398,939 26 Ron note 02/142007-11 01 11,471,088 17 11,456,802 28 11,470,619 42 4 257 18 Portfolio FIRE CP PM (PRF_PM2) 6ymRepl641 202E N U3 Report Ver 500 R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Activity By Type January 1, 2007 through January 31, 2007 Beginning Staletl Transaction Purchases Retlemptions Ending CUSIP Investmenl# Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 3 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SY50001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 5156 3,01440415 1,000,00000 Subtotal 5,175,158 03 3,014,404 15 1,000,000 00 7,149,562 18 Passbook/Checking Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS0002 0002 BANK OF AMERICA 0 500 168 787 98 0 00 Subtotal 152,738 01 168,787 98 0 00 321,525 99 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon Subtotal 3,999,531 25 3,999,531 25 Tolal 9,287,427 29 Run Dale 02I14ROW -11 01 3,183,192 13 1,000,000 00 11,470,619 42 Portfolio FIRE CF'D PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept 6 41 202 ~ Report Ver 500 P27 State of California Pooled Money Investment Account Market Valuation 12/31 /2006 Description Carrying Cost Plus Accrued Interest Purch. Amortized Cost Fair Value Accrued Interest United States Treasu Bills $ 3,634,185,18058 $ 3,656,438,45832 $ 3,658,110,00000 NA Notes $ - $ - $ - $ Federal A enc SBA $ 650,757,167 99 $ 650,757,167 99 $ 645,212,889 66 $ 6,059,021 84 MBS $ 967,109,452 17 $ 967,109,452 17 $ 946,700,233 97 $ 4,460,596 52 Bonds $ 8,891,445,329 50 $ 8,877,628,539 37 $ 8,869,866,903 91 $ 179,269,886 26 Floaters $ - $ $ - $ Discount Notes $ 5,579,459,188 97 $ 5,628,814,916 76 $ 5,630,725,000 00 NA FHLMC PC $ 770,155 88 $ 770,155 68 $ 796,210 94 $ 12,466 59 GNMA $ 225,314 77 $ 225,314 77 $ 249,268 62 $ 2,241 04 Bankers Acceptances $ - $ - $ - NA Bank Notes $ 1,065,000,000 00 $ 1,065,000,000 00 $ 1,064,961,507 25 $ 9,333,986 12 CDs $ 11,668,291,32476 $ 11,664,922,96364 $ 11,663,953,98695 $ 116,420,71946 Commercial Paper $ 7,738,589,189 53 $ 7,796,339,682 54 $ 7,797,232,811 39 NA Corporate Floaters $ 200,064,842 53 $ 200,064,842 53 $ 200,114,150 00 $ 1,149,924 67 Bonds $ 404,111,295 57 $ 403,683,545 57 $ 402,035,254 50 $ 5,622,922 10 Repurchase A reemen $ - $ - $ - NA Reverse Repurchase $ - $ - $ - $ Time Deposits $ 8,525,995,000 00 $ 8,525,995,000 00 $ 8,525,995,000 00 NA AB 55 & GF Loans $ 7,794,731,622 70 $ 7,794,731,622 70 $ 7,794,731,622 70 NA TOTAL $ 57,120,735,064 95 $ 57,232,481,662 24 $ 57,200,684,839 89 $ 322,331,764 60 Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 57,523,016,604 as Repurchase Agreements, Tlme Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost) The value of each participating dollar equals the fair value divided by the amortized cost (.999444427) As an example if an agency has an account balance of $20,000,000 00, then the agency would report its participation in the IAIF valued at $19,988,888 54 or $20,000,000 00 x 999444427 P28 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUC:\\IONGA FIRL PROTFCI ION DISTRICT Date. February 21, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Peter M Bryan, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II-Financial Administration . ~ i RANCHO C,UCAi\fONGA Subject: HUNTECDEVELOPMENTINC-SUBTT18139SPECIALELECTIONRESULTSPERTAININGTO ANNEXAl10N NO 06-6 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No 85-1, Annexation No 06-6 (a proposal to develop a 10 unit condominium project on approximately 1 O5 acres on the east side of Madrone Ave ,south of Arrow Route) BACKGROUND On December 20, 2006, the Board declared its intention to annex SUBTT18139 into CFD No 85-1 On January 17, 2007, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and called for a speaal election A special election was scheduled for January 24, 2007, after the adoption of the resolution declaring the annexation On January 24, 2007, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution) The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexed Territory Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexed Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property Respe ttully submitted, Peter M Brya Fire Chief Attachment P29 RESOLUTION NO FD 07-C9t~ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, ANNEXATION NO 06-6 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2 5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3 5 thereof The existing Community Facilities Distnct has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 (the "District"), and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, ANNEXATION NO 06-6 ("Annexed Territory"), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexed Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexed Territory, and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above rentals are all true and correct SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Offiaal, said Statement setting forth the number of votes case in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated SECTION 3 The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST SECTION 4 The Board hereby further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexed Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexed Territory SECTION 5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder P30 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2007 AYES• NOES• ABSENT. ABSTAINED: Donald J Kurth, M D ,President ATTEST Debra J Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2007 Executed this day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J Adams, Secretary P31 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) "' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIItE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Electrons Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the RANCHO CUC~IMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 ANNEXATION NO 06-6 SPECIAL ELECTION Rancho Cucamonga Frre Protection Drstnct In sand Frre Protection Drstnct held on January 24, 2007 I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes case m sand Drstnct, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure m sand Drstnct, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true and correct TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST II TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A AGAINST WITNESS my hand and official Seal this day of ,• 2007 C~ lectron Offi i State of California P32 STAFF REPORT RANQ-IO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date To: From: By: Subject: February 21, 2007 President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Peter M Bryan, Fire Chief Janet Walker, Management Analyst II-Financial Administration w RANCHO C',UCAMONGA RANCHO PLAZA PARTNERSHIP,LLC-APN 020111-56 SPECIALELECIIONRESULTS PERTAININGTOANNEXAIlONNO 06-11 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Faalities District No 85-1, Annexation No 06-11 (a proposal to demolish an existing 6,188 square foot building and replace with an 11,870 square foot building) BACKGROUND On November 15, 2006, the Board declared its intention to annex parcel 0201-811-56 into CFD No 85-1 On December 20, 2006, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and called for a special election A special election was scheduled for December 21, 2006, after the adoption of the resolution declaring the annexation On December 21, 2006, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution) The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexed Territory Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexed Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property Resp tfully submitted, Peter B an Fire Chief Attachment P33 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- G1 C-P A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 06-11 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Faalities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2 5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3 5 thereof The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 (the "District"), and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, ANNEXATION NO 06-11 ("Annexed Territory"), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexed Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexed Territory, and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes case in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated SECTION 3 The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST SECTION 4 The Board hereby further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexed Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexed Territory SECTION 5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder P34 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT. ABSTAINED• day of Donald J Kurth, ATTEST Debra J Adams, Secretary President I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2007 Executed this _ day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J Adams, Secretary 2007 P35 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SALT BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIItE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO I3EREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of Cahfornra, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 ANNEXATION NO 06-11 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection Drstnct held on December 21, 2006 I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes case m said Drstnct, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure m said D1Strlet, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true and correct I TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST II TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A 4 AGAINST lJ WITNESS my hand and official Seal thisO`~~day of ~, 2006 /, (~ d' (~-'~~'1-~ Electron Offi Rancho Cucamonga Frre Protection Drstnct State of Cahfomra P36 STAFF REPORT RANCHO C[JCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTTON DISTRICT Date: To From: By: Subject February 21, 2007 President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Peter M Bryan, Fire Chief Janet Walker, Management Analyst II-Financial Administration ~, ~• ~ " r .,~ RANCHO C',UCAMONGA 64HMAN SEPEHRNIA- SUBTT16788 SPECIAL ELECTION RESULTS PERTAINING TO ANNEXATION NO OFr12 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No 85-1, Annexation No 06-12 (a proposal to subdivide 1 11 acres into six (6) lots for residential condominiums on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Madrone Ave ) BACKGROUND On December 20, 2006, the Board declared its intention to annex SUBTT16788 into CFD No 85-1 On January 17, 2007, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and called for a special election A special election was scheduled for January 24, 2007, after the adoption of the resolution declaring the annexation On January 24, 2007, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution) The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the speaal tax in the Annexed Territory Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Speaal Tax Lien By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexed Territory will have notice of the speaal tax obligation affecting such property Respectfully submitted, Peter M B n Fire Chief Attachment P37 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-dDlo A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 06-12 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Faalities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2 5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and speafically Article 3 5 thereof The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 (the "District"), and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, ANNEXATION NO 06-12 ("Annexed Territory'), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexed Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexed Territory, and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection D~stnct does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above rentals are all true and correct SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes case in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated SECTION 3 The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST SECTION 4. The Board hereby further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the specal taxes within the Annexed Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexed Territory SECTION 5. OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) sh D be ecorded m the Offce of the County Recorder P38 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED• day of , 2007 Donald J Kurth, M D ,President ATTEST Debra J Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2007 Executed this _ day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California J Adams, Secretary P39 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) '~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provtsions of Sechon 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of Cahforn~a, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 ANNEXATION NO 06-12 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection D~stnct held on January 24, 2007 I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes case m said D~stnct, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure m said Distnct, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true and correct I TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST ~ II TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A ,,((~~ ~,,,, AGAINST WITNESS my hand and official Seal this~"`~day ot/yN/ I, , 2007 ~/ C~ Election Offict 1 Rancho Cucamonga Firc Protection D~stnct State of California P40 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAIv10NGA FIRE PROTECITON DISTRICT Date: To: From• By: Subject• February 21, 2007 President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Peter M Bryan, Fire Chief Janet Walker, Management Analyst II-Financial Administration RANCHO cUCAMONGA TOLLS BROTHERS-TT12332-2 SPECIAL ELECTION RESULTS PERTAINING TO ANNEXAl10N NO 88-0Fr1 RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No 88-1, Annexation No 88-06-1 (a proposal to build 46 single family residences on the east side of Haven Ave ,north of Ringstem Dr ) BACKGROUND On December 20, 2006, the Board declared its intention to annex TT12332-2 into CFD No 88-1 On January 17, 2007, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and called for a special election A speaal election was scheduled for January 24, 2007, after the adoption of the resolution declaring the annexation On January 24, 2007, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution) The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the speaal tax in the Annexed Territory Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Speaal Tax Lien By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexed Territory will have notice of the speaal tax obligation affecting such property Resp cttully submitted, eter Brya Fire Chief Attachment P41 RESOLUTION NO FD 07-~ J A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-06-1 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2 5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3 5 thereof The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 88-1 (the "District"), and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 88-1, ANNEXATION NO 88-06-1 ("Annexed Territory"), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexed Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexed Territory, and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes case in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated SECTION 3 The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST SECTION 4 The Board hereby further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexed Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexed Territory SECTION 5 Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder P42 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 2007 AYES: NOES: ABSENT. ABSTAINED: Donald J Kurth, M D ,President ATTEST Debra J Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2007 Executed this _ day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J Adams, Secretary 2 P43 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ ) ""~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 88-1 ANNEXATION NO 88-06-1 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection Distnct held on January 24, 2007 I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast m said Distnct, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure m said Distnct, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, tme and correct TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST II TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A WITNESS my hand and official Seal th~s~' / ~ day of FOR AGAINST 2007 Llect~on Official/ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct State of California P44 CT AFF RF.P(~RT IU1NQ-IO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICI~ Date. February 21, 2007 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From• Peter M Bryan, Fire Chief By Janet Walker, Management Analyst II-Finanaal Administration Subject. ADOPTION OF ANNEXATION BOUNDARY MAP NO 07-1 RANCHO C;UCANIONGA RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a resolution adopting a boundar~ map showing property (generally located at the northeast corner of Madrone Ave and 9t St) proposed to be annexed into Community Facilities District (CFD) No 85-1 BACKGROUND KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc (SUBTT17455) is conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District (CFD) No 85-1 In order to initiate formal proceedings to annex the referenced parcel into CFD No 85-1, a Resolution adopting an annexation boundary map is presented for Boar ocose'd to be annexedprThe territory sndnc us~ve of the (Exhibit "A") illustrates the territory p p entire project Respectfully submitted, Peter M Brya Fire Chief Attachments EXHIBIT 'A' qtr, a, ANNEXATION MAP N0. o~-~ OF COMMUNfTY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. 85-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FlRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA nfE N M OIQ s M ~cnEn D M MOO GCbG I4 ImlHaw oE1IR dIYM 116 m Ei >QI ~coAf MMlO GR/fOf'A HE P1WWD1 OmO SEE[ 6 dINM 1 N]!6' CpM1Y Mf M 6EN WP 91016 NNItlIEi 6 N61M1 AEfDIE W 6 NNF1W1 W CdWNI if41R 11MCf ML 6-1 d M MMpO Ol.Y1G NE PDIFCEd 06lMLT EOIIIf10f Sd M]NYO4 ELSE Q CYlE1M\ M Mw1UhE 6 M MYIO 6 dEC1010 01 9W1 O IM1161O1 EMIR 6 A MA4M 1lLIIN iNJO. IEID d M _ NII 6 ftE1, 6 ES IEmU61110. _~ 11 .YM[WY NP IIFIm M 1NEENRf W 161 0Y/N iNi11F5 161RT N1 W-1 d M INO[I CIfYOG H[ IRI19.1[II BINS. COINR Q SYI 16W14 SW[ 6 CYIdIY. MlN IFE011D d Y 1d~dYM5011~@IDWR NO mYEEIf ifCll6 CQIM:R RR MMQ; ~ N M OMEL 6 M CNNN MCNN1 Wt M CNNIf Q SIN NMN14 d,MK 97]EMf MN>Q CIINYC11H PIOIF0111 NSMR sooE v ufrml I I ~ 1 611N: MNI[ 1111- fM OG101101~ LMp Y6 N lOf 9 EOf f NNF1N9 ~ ~ {~ ~~~ ~" `~~~~ s ~ d~d w 2 ~d~ s -mlr p M6d 11S nm 1~m s P~ NIP b ma PILL it}/~7 M 02Tf-11-1 IUIII dll@I ~S ~5~ >~ tAN g7ay~p fY1LM!P/ 1~9 CfRtirAE M; IY! MK NJII n1E um EmAart ^rm n6 ~ AW COWfIY fAylp EmINCi N N¢ Y N Wd R 11E MAkSI 6 6 N M N4N16 (_~ s~yr+ Ao s W ~fi e x~ ~ Ele ua t s1oo~ ~ •~E~ [~ lARlMW MNIY 66[ Of U'UVEM EI` EFAIIY RI4ID1 P45 P46 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07-1JO S RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING A BOUNDARY MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 07-1) SHOWING PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Board of Directors"), desires to initiate proceedings to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2 5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of •the State of California, and specifically Article 3 5 thereof The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 (the "District"), and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled "Boundary Map No 07-1 to Community Facilities District No 85-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Boundary Map") showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the District (the "Territory") NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct does hereby resolve as follows SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2• The Boundary Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District and to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved and adopted SECTION 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of Boundary Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be fled with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California P47 Resolution No FD 07- Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 2007 AYES. NOES ABSENT: ABSTAINED. Donald J Kurth, M D ,President ATTEST: Debra J Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2007 Executed this _ day of 2007 at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J Adams, Secretary P48 ~~ STAFF REPORT ~, RANCHO CZICAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: February 21, 2007 C,'UCAD40NGA To• President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From• Peter M Bryan, Fire Chief By Janet Walker, Management Analyst II-Financial Administration Subject. RESOLUl10NOFINTEMIONTOANNEXTERRffORYT000MMUNfTYFACILfiIESDISTRICT NO 85-1 RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No 07-1 into Communty Facilities District No 85-1, to specify facilities and services to be financed, to set and specify the special taxes to be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed and to set a time and place for a public heanng regarding the annexation BACKGROUND KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc (SUBTT117455) is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities Distnct (CFD) No 85-1 to satisfy fire protection service mitigation impacts In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a resolution approving a boundary map of the territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution of Intention to Annex The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth (a) the District's intention to annex, (b) the facilities and services which the annexed property will, in part, finance (Exhibit "A" of said Resolution) through the levy of the special tax on the annexed property, (d) the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (Exhibit "B" of said Resolution), (e) the date, time and location of the public heanng set for March 21, 2007, and (f) election requirements Warren Diven, Special Counsel for the District, has worked with staff to establish the annexation process, timelines and draft resolutions The resolution is considered to be P49 RESOLLTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX nta~,r~p~~i ~nn~ PAGE Z routine and non-controversial, as the developer is in support of the annexation procedure On March 21, 2007, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter Respectfully submitted, Peter M an Fire Chief Attachment P50 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07- ~~~I RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 07-1) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, ("Board of Directors"), formed a Community Fanlities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Faalities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2 5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") The Community Faalities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 (the "District"), and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of certain real property to the District (the "Territory"), and WHEREAS, a map entitled "Annexation Map No 07-1 to Community Facilities District No 85-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California" (the "Boundary Map") showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted, which map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings, and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to annex the Territory to District, to describe the territory included within District and the Territory proposed to be annexed thereto, to specfy the services to be financed from the proceeds of the levy of special taxes within the Terntory, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the Territory to finance such services, and to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct does hereby resolve as follows RECITALS SECTION 1: The above rentals are all true and correct LEGAL AUTHORITY SECTION 2: These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors pursuant to the authorization of the Act INTENTION TO ANNEX DESCRIPTION OF TERRITORY AND THE DISTRICT SECTION 3. This legislative body hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District A description of the Territory is as follows P51 Resolution No 07- Page -2- All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is shown on the Boundary Map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection A general description of the territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently annexed to the District, as such properties were shown on maps of the original Distract and the territories subsequently annexed to the District, ali as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the name of the original District Copies of such maps are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the Office of the County Recorder SERVICES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT SECTION 4: The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District (the "Services") are generally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide the Services The Services authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within District are the types of services to be provided in the Territory If and to the extent possible the Services shall be provided in common within the District and the Territory P52 Resolution No 07- Page -3- SPECIAL TAXES SECTION 5• It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a speaal tax sufficient to pay for the Services and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continwng lien against all non-exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to Exhibit B (the "Special Tax Formula"),which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which sets forth insufficient detail the method of apportionment of such speaal tax to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay The speaal tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the speaal tax levied to pay for the Services in the District, except that a higher or lower speaal tax may be levied within the Territory to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services in the Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services in the original District Notwithstanding the foregoing, the speaal tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than the maximum speaal tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the Speaal Tax Formula The speaal taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes, however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary Any speaal taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District Upon recordation of a Notice of Speaal Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the speaal tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the speaal tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases The maximum speaal tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District P53 Resolution No 07- Page -4- PUBLIC HEARING SECTION 6 NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 17th DAY OF MARCH 2007, AT THE HOUR OF 7 00 O'CLOCK P M , IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED METHOD AND APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES W ITHIN THE TERRITORY W ILL BE HEARD AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, PROTESTS AGAINST THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY OR ANY OTHER PROPOSALS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION MAY BE MADE ORALLY BY ANY INTERESTED PERSON ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH OBJECTION IS MADE ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING P54 Resolution No 07- Page -5- MAJORITY PROTEST SECTION 7• If (a) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the District, (b) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the Territory, (c) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in the District, or (d)owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included m the Territory, file written protests against the proposed annexation of the Territory to the District and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one yearfrom the date of the decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public hearing ELECTION SECTION 8• Upon the conclusion of the public heanng, if the legislative body determines to proceed with the annexation, a proposition shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory The vote shall be by registered voters within the Territory, however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory NOTICE SECTION 9. Notice of the time and place of the public heanng shall be given by the Secretary by publication in a legally designated newspaper of general arculation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the Act P55 Resolution No 07- Page -6- PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this AYES. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: day of Donald J ATTEST Debra H Adams, Secretary 2007 M D .President I, DEBRA J ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2007 Executed this day of 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J Adams, Secretary P56 Resolution No 07- Page -7- EXHIBIT 'A' COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services P57 Resolution No 07- Page -8- EXHIBIT 'B' COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 07-1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adtustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the Maximum Specal Tax in Community Facilities District No 85-1, Annexation No 07-1 for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 shall be Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($138 06) Multi-Family 2 DU 1 75 = ($138 06) 3 DU 2 25 = ($138 06) 4 DU 2 65 = ($138 06) 5-14 DU 2 65 = ($138 06) + { 35 (TU-4) ($138 06)} 15-30 DU 6 15 = ($138 06) + { 30 (TU-14) ($138 06)} 31-80 DU 10 65 = ($138 06) + { 25 (TU-30) ($138 06)} 81 - up DU 23 15 = ($138 06) + { 20 (TU-80) ($138 06)} Commercial ($138 06) per acre + $ 0 75 per SF Industrial ($138 06) per acre + $ 092 per SF Note DU =Dwelling Unit TU =Total Units SF =Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commenting on July 1, 2006 and each July 15` thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser P58 Resolution No 07- Page -g- REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a 01 cent reduction m the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems In addition, multi-floor commercal and industrial structures shall also be granted a 01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property Developed Property is defined to be property which is not owned by a public or governmental agency, which is not vacant, - where a "certificate of occupancy" or "utility release" from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued, which has an existing bwlding or structure onsite, - which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget regwrements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Specal Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Faalities District No 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services -Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District ~~,'° . ~`y R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A F I R E P R O T E C T I O N D I S T R I C T Staff Report DATE: January 21, 2007 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief BY: Pamela Pane, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN NEW LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, DBA VERIZON WIRELESS, AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A MONOPINE AND FOR INSTALLATION OF A COMMUNICATION SERVICE FACILITY AT FIRE STATION NO. 175, 11108 BANYAN STREET RECOMMENDATION It Is recommended that the Flre Board approve a Communications Faculty Lease Agreement between New Los Angeles SMSA Llmlted Partnership, DBA Verizon Wheless, and Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection District (District) for the placement of a monopine and for Installation of a communication service faculty at Flre Station No 175, 11108 Banyan Street BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS New Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, DBA Verizon Wireless, (Verizon) seeks to enter into a communications facility lease agreement with the Dlstrlct in order to Install a communication service faculty at Flre Station No 175 at 11108 Banyan Street Dlstrlct staff, In conjunction with the City Attorney's office, has been negotiating with Verizon to arrive at a lease agreement A copy of the final agreement, that has been reviewed and approved by the District's legal counsel, Is attached as Exhibit A The Initial lease term shall be for five (5) years, subject to four (4) five (5) year extensions, commencing upon the Effective Date, however, the obligation to pay rent shall not begin until Verizon commences construction of its faculty, or ninety (90) days after the Effective Date, whichever is earlier P59 The initial rent shall be $18,000 00 per year, paid In equal monthly installments in advance, on or before the first day of each month during the term of the lease Commencing with the second term, and upon each renewal term thereafter, rent shall APPROVAL OF COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICT AND VERIZON January 21, 2007 Page 2 be Increased by an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the rent for the previous term To offset the District's costs, Verizon will pay cone-time administrative fee in the amount of $1,500 00 With the Board's approval the Communications Facility Lease with Verizon will generate additional revenue for the District and will be part of the District's General Fund Revenue Operations at Fire Station 175 will not be impacted by Verizon's activities Respectfully Submitted, .n Peter ryan Fire lef P60 P61 ~vF.,.~ ~t ~J T H E C [ T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A - FIRE PROTECTION D I S T R I C T Staff Report DATE: February 21, 2007 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Carrie Pincott, Records Coordinator SUBJECT: Destruction of Flre District Records RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the Board approve the attached Resolution authorizing the destruction of Fire District records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the District's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The records in the attached destruction requests have met their required retention as listed in the District's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final disposition The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representative, the Department Head and the City Attorney CAP (Attachments as noted) P62 RESOLUTION NO. FD 07 d/!3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF DISTRICT RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain Fire District records have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes, and WHEREAS, said District records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to conserve storage space, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy, and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney, NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire District does hereby resolve as follows SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof P63 Resolution No 07 *" Page 2 SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J Kurth, M D ,President ATTEST: Debra J Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J Adams, CMC, City Clerk P64 EXHIBIT `A' Records Destruction Authorizations for the following Departments /Divisions Fire (Admen) Fire Safety Fire Finance Emergency Preparedness Notification Number Destruction Notification Report 10/24/2006 08.39:02 z36 City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) page 1 Records Management Division (TMP) FIRE DEPARTMENT (5020) Bill to Name. (5020) tecords Coordinator Janet Walker Mail Code Phone: (909)477-2770 ext: 3003 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/06. Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo 7ustifymg the hold. Return the entire I~st to the Records Division by November 09, 2006 Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name (X)Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Dates On Destroy Ending Holds 12/31/2006 Location Shred 2629 13030 5 Paramedic Reports (OSA) -Adult 07/01/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/2006 OS-03-03 Box Contents Paramedic OlA (Adult 7/99 - 12/99) E =Excluded Total Eligible Boxes to be destroyed = 1 Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibile Boxes Checked Out = 0 Eligible Boxes Removed = 0 Total Available Boxes to be destroyed = 1 // ~ ~ ob ~ ~ Date Peter Bryan, Fire Chief Spa~ce# lY Cn P66 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -Fire Board Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents (To be processed with the Dec , 2006 serru-annual destruction Stgn, date and return to the Records Drv~ston by K'ovember 9, 2006 Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that appro~ a] was Granted ) Department Ftre (5020) Requestor Tanet Walker I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed These records have not been stored m the City's Records Center, and, as such, are not fisted m the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage), therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the semi-annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process Descnptron of Records /Documents (Include Record Title Code from Records Retention Schedule when applicable) Begmmng and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Records /Documents (Mo/Yr) 1020 1 -Gen'] Correspondence All dated thru calendar year 2004 1302 ] 3 - Frre Investigations - Type A All that became inactive pnor to 1/1/2002 (after scanning) 13021 6 - Frre Investigations - Type C All that became macttve pnor to 1/1/2001 2050 2 - Dept'1 Budget Working Papers Al] thru calendar year 2004 6060 3 -Equipment Maintenance All that became macttve pnor to 1/1/2005 7040 5 -Daily Actrvrty Logs Calendar year 2004 Department Approval ~~ /a~ Signature Date Fire Board Approval Date /Resolution # City Attorney Approval Signature Destroyed by Date Signature Date RM Revised l0/2002 P67 CITY OF RA>\CHO CUCAMONGA -Fire Board Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents (To be processed with the Dec , 2006 semi-annual destruction Slgn, date and retttm to the Records Division by November 9, 2006 Do not destroy listed records until notified by the Records Coordinator that appro~a] was granted ) Department Fire Safety (502>l Requestor Tanet Walker I have inspected the follow mg records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed These records have not been stored m the City's Records Center, and, as such, are not fisted m the City's Automated Records Management System (Advantage), therefore, destruction is requested outside the scope of the semi-annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process Descnphon of Records /Documents (Include Beginning and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records /Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 13020 4 - Fii eworks All dated thru calendar year 2004 13025 1 - Matenal Safety Data Sheets All dated thru 1976 13030 2 -Business Occupancies All that became inactive pnor to 1/1/2003 Department Approval (~~~~ Signature Date Fire Board Approval Date /Resolution # City Attorney Approval Signature Destroyed by Date Signature Date RM Rc~~sed 102002 Notification Number 237 Bill to Name: (5027) Destruction Notification Report City of Rancho Cucamonga (RC) Records Management Division (TMP) FIRE FINANCE (5027) 10/24/2006 08.49.55 Page 1 2ecords Coordinator: Tamara Layne Mail Cotle• Phone: (909)477-2700 ext 2430 The following records are due for destruction on 12/31/06 Place your initials next to EACH box you authorize to be destroyed, then sign & date the bottom of EACH page. If you want a box held for an additional 6 months, provide a memo~ustifying the hold Return the entire list to the Records Division by November 09, 2006. Destroy Permanent Record Title Record Title Name Code Box Number Code (Box Contents) Dates Ending red 3350 4040.0 Fire -Payroll Records Box Contents Fire Payroll Records Box Contents Payroll Timecards, Check Copies, Box Contents Leave Balance Register, Employee Prelis[ Box Con[en[s Contnbution & Deduction Reg E =Excluded 05/01/2001 08/31/2001 On Destroy Holds 12/31/2006 Location 08/31/2006 06-03-03 Total Eligible Boxes to be destroyed = 1 Eligible Boxes on Hold = 0 Elgibde Boxes Checked Out = 0 Eligible Boxes Removed = 0 Total Available Boxes to be destroyed = 1 1 l cY /'LL~ rn Date Peter Bryan, Fire Chief Date lam ay e, Fm. 9fficeL ~C/p-, N P69 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval and Authorization To Destroy Paper Records and/or Documents (To be processed wtth the Dec , ?006 setnt-annual destruction Stgn, date and return to the Records Drvtston by November 9, ?006 Do not destroy fisted records unll] notified by the Record s Coordinator that approval was granted ) Department Emeraencv Prenaredness (4125) Requestor Janet Walker I have inspected the following records/documents and recommend/request that they be destroyed These records have not been stored m the Ctty's Records Center, and, as such, are not fisted m the Ctty's Automated Records Management System (Advantage), therefore, destructron is requested outsrde the scope of the annual Advantage computer-generated destruction process Descnpuon of Records /Documents (Include Begmmng and Ending (Inclusive) Dates of Record Title Code from Records Retention Records /Documents (Mo/Yr) Schedule when applicable) 1020 1 -General Correspondence Calendar Year 2004 2010 3 - CERT Apphcahons All dated thru calendar year 2004 2010 9 -Policies & Procedures All that were superseded pnor to 1/1/2001 Department Approval ~~~%~ Signature Date Council Approval Date /Resolution # City Attorney Approval Signature Date Destroyed by Signature Date February 5, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Monday, February 5, 2007, in Rancho Cucamonga Hall at the Rancho Cucamonga Central Park Community Center located at 11200 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California Mayor Donald J Kurth, M D called the meeting to order at 4 15 p m Present were Counalmembers Rex Gutierrez, L Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, and Mayor Donald J Kurth, M D Also present were Jack Lam, City Manager, Pamela Easter, Assistant City Manager, James Markman, City Attorney, Marcia Godwin, Assistant to the City Manager, Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III, Fabian Villenas, Management Analyst III, Linda D Daniels, Redevelopment Director, Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development, Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, Karen McGuire-Emery, Sr Park Planner, Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official, Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, Dave Moore, Community Services Superintendent, Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Superintendent, Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III, JoAnn Gwynn, Community Services Supervisor, Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, Chief Peter Bryan and Management Analyst II Pamela Pane, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and Debra J Adams, City Clerk ..,.. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS No communication was made from the public F#Y#k# C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS C1 DISCUSSION REGARDING FUTURE POTENTIAL CITY PARK PROJECTS Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the Council had previously met in the summer 2006 and that staff would like to update the Councl about what is possibly being proposed for the future He stated there may be some funding available and that it is important for the staff to find out the priority projects from the Council Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, presented a staff report referring to the notebook of information distributed to the Council, which is on file in the City Clerk's office He stated that once staff gets direction from the Council they will work on those protects identified Mayor Pro Tem Williams asked if we have met the goals for the teens and youth Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated we continue to expand our services to the teens, and that we have made great strides to meet their needs Special City Council Meeting February 5, 2007 Page 2 Councilmember Spagnolo referred to the survey mentioned by Mr McArdle and asked since the survey is about seven years old and had only been completed by 500 people, if we would be using this as a base line and talking to more people now to see what the needs are Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, felt this information is still accurate and applies to today's needs He felt in a few years another needs analysis might be done At the completion of Mr McArdle's presentation, the Council expressed their priorities Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like Central Park to be the number one priority He would like to see an aquatics center there He mentioned the possibility of underground parking at this location He suggested park benches around the existing center He stated he still likes the Cucamonga Beach idea He felt we might want to charge people that use the park that are from out of our City He stated he would like to see the passive area built, but possibly not put in the lakes He stated he would like to see the park clear in the middle He felt the Napa site seems problematic He stated the Northeast Park has great potential, but would like to focus on Central Park Councilmember Spagnolo stated he agreed with Councilmember Gutierrez's ideas on Central Park He wanted to be sure that any swimming pools that are put in meet the standards of the "Rancho way" He liked the idea of a regional aspect at this park He stated he has concerns with Northeast Park He stated he agrees with Councilmember Gutierrez's comments about Napa Park Councilmember Michael liked the idea of an aquatics center and wanted to help Councilmember Gutierrez get his Cucamonga Beach He stated he would like there to be a balance for a recreation pool and competitive pool He stated he was not sure about the tennis facility He stated his number one priority would be the aquatics center He felt we should consider building the fire station within Central Park, and added he wo41d like us to use as small an area of land as possible for the station so there is more land available that can be used for the community to entoy He stated his next priority is Northeast Park and would like to see more fields He stated his third priority would be the passive area for Central Park He stated he felt it is important to build something only if we know where the O & M money will come from Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated her top priority is the aquatics center and felt it would get a lot of use She stated she liked the idea of Cucamonga Beach as suggested by Councilmember Gutierrez She stated she would like to look at underground parking at Central Park She liked the idea of passive park space and felt that should be left open She agreed with Councilmember Michael about fitting the fire station on as small an area as possible She liked the idea of the Redevelopment Agency providing funding assistance for some of these ideas She felt we need the fields desperately at Northeast Park She felt the dog park needs a face lift She felt the Napa Park site is a "hold and see " She urged the City to be wise and that O & M considerations are important She stated she is not in favor of Freedom's Flame being at Central Park and felt it should go some place else Mayor Kurth felt this is a good opportunity to build out Central Park He stated he was not sure of the tennis facility, fire station and parking lot proposed to be built on the west side He felt the open space area should have a spiritual feel He felt we should look to see if soccer needs are increasing or decreasing He felt the land should be used for what will benefit people the most He felt we should start over with Central Park and wipe the slate clean He felt all of this should be looked at again He wasn't sure Freedom's Flame should be there He felt Northeast Park was a great opportunity and hated to see this not used He felt the Napa site has a lot of challenges He felt possibly the best thing for the City is to purchase some other land He stated he would hate to see Central Park full of parking lots Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated he is hearing the Council saying to maximize open space and put lots of trees and grass around the proposed buildings Mayor Pro Tem Williams asked if we need this many tennis courts at Central Park She agreed this should be left as open as possible Speaal City Council Meeting February 5, 2007 Page 3 Kevin McArdle Community Services Director, stated the west side of the park would be on a plateau, but the open space would have a very passive feel Councilmember Michael asked if we would have to go through an EIR for the buildings proposed on the west side of the park Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated we would need to update the EIR Councilmember Michel felt staff should look to see if the fire station should go in at Central Park, and reiterated he didn't want us to use any more land than is necessary for the fire station at this location He mentioned the sign for Freedom's Flame that was approved to be placed at Central Park He stated things change and felt Freedom's Flame should go to another location He felt this should be addressed and re-evaluated by the Council Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated she would also like to discuss Freedom's Flame going in at the park She stated it was in the plans to have a memorial at Central Park for those that have lost their lives in war, and felt 9-11 could be included in that memorial She stated she wasn't sure a large amount of land should be taken by the Freedom's Flame monument She didn't think Freedom's Flame should be a thing that is attracting visitors from all over She did not feel tax payer dollars should go into the Freedom's Flame monument She stated if the City were able to obtain millions of dollars from the State, it should not be spent on Freedom's Flame and should be used towards something that would benefit more of our residents She stated she would like the Council to take an action to take Freedom's Flame out of the park Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like that action to be on the next available agenda for the Council to consider He felt we should do this as quickly as possible Mayor Pro Tem Williams felt it would be good for people to put out their ideas what can be done with the park Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, summarized the priorities he heard from the Council 1 The top priority is the development of the Family Aquatics Center at Central Park, with the goal of maximizing the open space area throughout the park as it continues to develop 2 The second priority is the development of lighted athletic fields at Etiwanda Creek Park 3 With regards to the proposed Napa Street Soccer Complex, the City should continue to explore this option, as well as other options that may become available for development of a sports complex in the City 4 The City should continue to look for alternatives to acquire additional land for future parks It was also noted the Council agreed with the underground parking idea at Central Park Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff will consider all of the Council's comments when bringing back additional information to the Councl Counalmember Michael felt staff should find out if the tennis courts are important to the public ....., Special City Council Meeting February 5, 2007 Page 4 D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to adtourn Motion carried unanimously 5-0 The meeting adtourned at 6 25 p m Respectfully submitted, Debra J Adams, CMC City Clerk/Records Manager Approved CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/]3/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247238 1/31/2007 3CMA 350 00 AP - 00247239 1/31/2007 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 223 18 AP - 00247240 1/3]/2007 AARDVARK TACTICAL INC 4,058 29 AP-00247241 1/3]/2007 AAVCO 6,18718 AP - 00247242 1/31/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 25 00 AP - 00247243 1/31/2007 ABLAC 16 39 AP - 00247244 1/31/2007 ACCELA INC 350 00 AP - 00247245 1/31/2007 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 300 00 AP - 00247246 1/31/2007 AED INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC 645 89 AP - 00247247 1/31/2007 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC 5,332 75 AP - 00247247 ]/31/2007 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING INC 800 74 AP - 00247249 1/31/2007 ALL CITIES TOOLS 95 90 AP - 00247252 1/31/2007 ALPHAGRAPHICS 319 35 AP - 00247253 1/31/2007 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 425 00 AP - 00247254 1/31/2007 AMAZON COM CREDIT 67 85 AP - 00247255 1/31/2007 AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INC 1,000 00 AP - 00247256 1/31/2007 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 160 00 AP - 00247257 1/31/2007 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 210 00 AP - 00247258 1/31/2007 AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 210 00 AP - 00247259 1/31/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO INC 564 34 AP - 00247261 1/31/2007 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 14 600 86 AP - 00247262 1/31/2007 ARBOR NURSERY PLUS 476 26 AP - 00247263 1/31/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 258 00 AP - 00247263 1/31/2007 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 211 75 AP - 00247264 1 /31 /2007 ARELLANO, MARICELLA 40 00 AP - 00247265 1/31/2007 ARMSTRONG, BARBARA 148 00 AP - 00247266 1/31/2007 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 2,500 00 AP - 00247266 1/31/2007 ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC 967 64 AP - 00247267 1/31/2007 ASPA 100 00 AP - 00247268 1/3]/2007 ASSI SECURITY 865 00 AP - 00247269 1/31/2007 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INC 22,7]6 00 AP - 00247270 1/31/2007 AUFBAU CORPORATION 9,912 00 AP - 00247270 1/31/2007 AUFBAU CORPORATION 10,858 00 AP - 00247270 1/31/2007 AUFBAU CORPORATION 7,031 00 AP - 00247271 1/31/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 13 15 AP - 00247272 1/31/2007 BADIOLA, MANNY 500 00 AP - 00247273 1/31/2007 BALDEON, CARLOS 798 00 AP - 00247274 1/31/2007 BANKS, TERESER 74 00 AP - 00247275 1/31/2007 BARNES AND NOBLE 68 74 AP - 00247276 1/31/2007 BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC 352 34 AP - 00247277 1/31/2007 BCT ENTERTAINMENT 402 95 AP - 00247278 ]/31/2007 BERGE, BRANDI 44 31 AP-00247279 1/31/2007 BERNARD,IEREMY 1,13175 AP - 00247280 1/31/2007 BIRES, MICHAEL A 100 00 AP - 00247281 1/31/2007 BISHOP COMPANY 460 86 AP - 00247282 1/31/2007 BLAUERT, KAY 44 00 AP - 00247283 1/31/2007 BRAN, NORMA 500 00 AP - 00247283 1/31/2007 BRAN, NORMA 262 00 AP - 00247284 1/31/2007 BRENT BINNALL ENTERPRISES 726 88 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 440 48 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 2,930 29 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 181 02 P70 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page. 1 Current Date. 02/14/200 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pomau Layout Ttme: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A¢enda Check Resister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 8 51 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 268 13 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 29 85 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 53 12 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 45 84 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 107 00 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 15 93 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 22 24 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 75 09 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 18 72 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 12 77 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 8 51 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 8 51 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 663 95 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 12 77 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 1 93 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 2,164 06 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 65 96 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 23 65 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 51 30 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 6 41 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 6 41 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 8 51 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4 26 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 4,081 55 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 2,023 29 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 16 44 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 27 21 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 36 68 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 22 85 AP - 00247286 1/31/2007 BRODART BOOKS 47 30 AP - 00247287 1/31/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 411 00 AP - 00247287 1/31/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 1,158 00 AP - 00247287 1/31/2007 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC 15,514 37 AP - 00247288 1/31/2007 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 231 92 AP - 00247289 1/31/2007 CALBO 150 00 AP - 00247290 1/31/2007 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 834 29 AP - 00247292 1/31/2007 CALPELRA 270 00 AP - 00247293 1/31/2007 CALSENSE 156 36 AP - 00247294 1/31/2007 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 18 21 AP - 00247295 1/31/2007 CAMPBELL, RON 78 00 AP - 00247297 1/31/2007 CARTER, BEVERLY-NORVILLE 250 00 AP - 00247298 1/31/2007 CEDAR MINISTRY 500 00 AP - 00247299 1/31/2007 CENTER OF HIS WILL 250 00 AP - 00247300 1/31/2007 CENTERSTAGING MUSICAL PROD 1NC 3,515 51 AP - 00247301 1/31/2007 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 91 59 AP - 00247301 1/31/2007 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 91 58 P71 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page• 2 Current Date• 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Regtster Pomatt Layout Ttme• 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247301 1/31/2007 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 4,456 54 AP - 00247302 1/31/2007 CHEN, JENNIFER 52 00 AP - 00247303 1/31/2007 CHOE, JUNG S 250 00 AP - 00247304 1/31/2007 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT ; 20 00 AP - 00247305 1/31/2007 CHU, FUMIE 120 00 AP - 00247306 1/31/2007 CISNEROS, TERESA 40 00 AP - 00247307 ]/31/2007 CITY RENTALS 142 50 AP - 00247308 1/31/2007 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000 00 AP - 00247309 1/31/2007 CLARK, JEANNE 235 00 AP - 00247310 1/31/2007 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC 38 79 AP - 00247310 1/31/2007 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC 9 42 AP - 00247311 1/31/2007 CLAY JR ,JACK 500 00 AP - 00247312 1/31/2007 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 2,066 63 AP - 00247312 1/31/2007 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 3,324 06 AP - 00247312 1/31/2007 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 3,915 58 AP - 00247313 1/31/2007 CLOUD, DON 700 00 AP - 00247314 1/31/2007 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 139 06 AP - 00247316 1/31/2007 CONGER, BILLIE 40 00 AP - 00247317 1/31/2007 COOKSON ROLLING DOORS 379 00 AP - 00247317 1/31/2007 COOKSON ROLLING DOORS 5,690 50 AP - 00247318 1/31/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC 269 98 AP - 00247318 1/31/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC 241 23 AP - 00247318 1/31/2007 COPIES & INK PRINTING INC 110 21 AP - 00247319 1/31/2007 COPP CRUSHING CORP, DAN 114 00 AP - 00247320 1/31/2007 CORE MEDIA 562 00 AP - 00247321 1/31/2007 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION ] 5,668 25 AP - 00247321 1!31/2007 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION 2,318 40 AP - 00247324 1/31/2007 CPRS 110 00 AP - 00247325 1/31/2007 CREATIVE DATA PRODUCTS 2,006 08 AP - 00247326 1/31/2007 CSMFO 110 00 AP - 00247327 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA 220 LP/DEVELOPMENT ACCT 921 94 AP - 00247328 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA MUSIC CO 300 00 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 49 16 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66 80 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 651 62 AP - 0024733 ] 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 497 26 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153 56 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 458 54 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 367 82 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 103 78 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 658 82 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ] 50 34 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 400 52 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 661 34 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 419 42 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110 78 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110 78 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 399 26 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135 74 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 619 76 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220 34 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 104 48 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 657 29 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 849 11 P72 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Regtster Portrau Layout Ttme: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7g A¢enda Check Reetster ]/31/2007 through 2/]3/2007 Check No Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74 56 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 288 44 AP - 00247331 ]/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141 06 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,077 14 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 292 16 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 408 08 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 96 29 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 685 67 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 326 18 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163 64 AP - 0024733] 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 375 32 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 372 88 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 75 26 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 203 96 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 406 82 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 265 70 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137 64 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 326 24 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146 00 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 192 62 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125 84 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 364 04 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 793 64 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 217 82 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 614 78 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134 72 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42 50 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114 32 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38 72 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90 62 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 498 86 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 104 48 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142 78 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 259 22 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 167 48 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144 80 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156 64 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 358 94 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 169 94 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 58 88 AP-00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 20018 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 312 32 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 122 12 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73 60 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 653 78 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 608 42 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202 70 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 372 88 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 350 18 AP - 00247331 1/31/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101 72 AP - 00247332 1/31/2007 CUSTOM ASPHALT INC 500 00 AP - 00247333 1/31/2007 D 3 EQUIPMENT 45 08 AP - 00247334 1/31/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 44,477 50 AP - 00247334 1/31/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 23,918 62 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date• 02/14/200 Report CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time• 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P74 Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[ AP - 00247334 1/31/2007 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 21,100 00 AP - 00247335 1/31/2007 DAWSON, LENORA 22 80 AP - 00247336 1/31/2007 DE LEON, STEPHANIE 40 00 AP - 00247337 1!31/2007 DELANCE, JACK 100 00 AP - 00247339 1/31/2007 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 133 20 AP - 00247340 1/31/2007 DUMLER, RACHEL 86 00 AP - 00247341 1/31/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 467 09 AP - 00247341 1/31/2007 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION ]0 55 AP - 00247342 1/31/2007 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 513 97 AP - 00247343 1/31/2007 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC 866 48 AP - 00247343 1/31/2007 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC 946 28 AP - 00247343 1/31/2007 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC 985 85 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 725 99 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 140 84 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 40 14 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 66 56 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 107 99 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 290 78 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS -28 63 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 766 57 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 144 55 AP - 00247344 1/31/2007 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 844 52 AP - 00247345 1/31/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 54 00 AP - 00247346 1/31/2007 F S MOTOR SPORTS INC 1,287 70 AP - 00247347 1/31/2007 FANCESCHI, NECKING 58 00 AP - 00247348 1/31/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 14 79 AP - 00247348 1/31/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP ]6 61 AP - 00247348 1/31/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21 85 AP - 00247348 1/31/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11 18 AP - 00247348 1/31/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16 61 AP - 00247348 1/31/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 10 79 AP - 00247348 1/31/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19 73 AP - 00247348 1/31/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 32 80 AP - 00247349 1/31/2007 FELBERG, MARY 64 00 AP - 00247350 1/31/2007 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 443 16 AP - 00247350 1/31/2007 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 978 61 AP - 00247351 1/31/2007 FERRELL, LaVONDA 250 00 AP - 00247352 1/31/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 697 50 AP - 00247352 1/31/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 930 00 AP - 00247352 1/31/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 934 50 AP - 00247352 1/31/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 630 00 AP - 00247354 1/31/2007 FISHER, THERESA 250 00 AP - 00247355 1/31/2007 FLAMENCO, MARLENY 250 00 AP - 00247356 1/31/2007 FLEET GLASS 203 00 AP - 00247356 1/31/2007 FLEET GLASS 214 02 AP - 00247357 1/31/2007 FLEET STAR INC 756 67 AP - 00247358 1/31/2007 FOWLER, ARLENE 250 00 AP - 00247359 1/31/2007 FREDRICS, HEATHER 14 50 AP - 00247362 1/31/2007 GARCIA, DOMINIC 150 00 AP - 00247364 1/31/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 1,126 28 AP - 00247364 1/31/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 340 76 AP - 00247365 1/31/2007 GOLF VENTURES WEST 308 28 AP - 00247366 1/31/2007 GRAINGER 397 04 AP - 00247368 1/31/2007 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 115 09 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date. 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Poma~t Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P75 Agenda Check Reeister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247369 1/3]/2007 GTSI CORP 3,887 Ol AP - 00247369 1/3 ] /2007 GTSI CORP 159 33 AP - 00247369 1/31/2007 GTSI CORP 2,751 83 AP - 00247369 1/31/2007 GTSI CORD 252 81 AP - 00247370 1/31/2007 GUERRA, CYNTHIA 85 00 AP - 00247371 1/31/2007 GUTIERREZ, BIANCA 200 00 AP - 00247372 1/31/2007 GUTIERREZ, CONNIE 250 00 AP - 00247373 1/31/2007 HAEKYUNG, CHO 250 00 AP - 00247374 1/31/2007 HAMILTON, ANGEL 78 00 AP - 00247376 1/31/2007 HANSON, BARRYE 3,060 00 AP - 00247377 1/31/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 218 64 AP - 00247377 1/31/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 13 20 AP - 00247378 1/31/2007 HOLDSWORTH, DEANNA 20 00 AP-00247378 1/31/2007 HOLDSWORTH,DEANNA 4000 AP - 00247379 1/31/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 495 49 AP - 00247379 1/31/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 543 06 AP - 00247379 1/31/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 163 78 AP - 00247379 1/31/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 91 OS AP - 00247379 1/31/2007 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 217 12 AP - 00247380 1/31/2007 HOSE MAN INC 1 96 AP - 00247380 1/31/2007 HOSE MAN INC 70 46 AP - 00247381 1/31/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 42 00 AP - 00247381 1/31/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 96 00 AP - 00247381 1/31/2007 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 1 ] 8 00 AP - 00247382 1/31/2007 IIIINTINGTON HARDWARE 357 23 AP - 00247383 1/31/2007 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 149 29 AP - 00247384 1/31/2007 IBM CORPORATION 948 64 AP - 00247384 1/31/2007 IBM CORPORATION 3,071 91 AP - 00247385 1/31/2007 INGERSOLL RAND 1,509 31 AP - 00247386 1/31/2007 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 874 00 AP - 00247386 1/31/2007 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 874 00 AP - 00247387 1/31/2007 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 880 50 AP - 00247388 1/31/2007 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 1,124 26 AP - 00247388 1/31/2007 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 543 28 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION -150 00 AP - 00247389 1/3 ] /2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 68 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 227 13 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION -116 32 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247389 1/31/2007 IRON AGE CORPORATION 199 99 AP - 00247390 1/31/2007 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 461 50 AP - 00247391 1/31/2007 JACKSON HIRSH INC 104 06 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date. 02/14/200 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P76 Agenda Check Reeister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247392 1/31/2007 JERIDO, MICHAEL 78 00 AP - 00247393 1/31/2007 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 112 20 AP - 00247394 1/31/2007 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 4,645 52 AP - 00247395 1/31/2007 JONES, ROBERT 2,800 00 AP - 00247396 1/31/2007 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 92,808 00 AP - 00247396 1/31/2007 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN NC 1,265 85 AP - 00247397 1/31/2007 KAMBLE, PURNIMA 52 00 AP - 00247398 1/31/2007 KAUFMAN, HOPE 200 00 AP - 00247399 1/31/2007 KELLY EQUIPMENT 817 30 AP - 00247403 1/31/2007 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 4,816 49 AP - 00247403 1/31/2007 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 11,364 30 AP - 00247404 1/31/2007 LAM, JACK 200 00 AP - 00247405 1/31/2007 LAMOUREUX, JORDAN 180 00 AP - 00247406 1/31/2007 LAMOUREUX, JULIE 360 00 AP - 00247407 1/31/2007 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 3,700 00 AP - 00247408 1/31/2007 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 361 37 AP - 00247409 1/31/2007 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 490 00 AP - 00247410 1/31/2007 LEE, DOROTHY ] S2 00 AP - 00247411 1/31/2007 LEE JIYOUN 41 00 AP - 00247412 ]/31/2007 LEE, MINYL 105 00 AP - 00247414 1/31/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 250 00 AP - 00247414 1/31/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 800 00 AP - 00247414 1/31/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 100 00 AP - 00247414 1/31/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTION'S 200 00 AP - 00247414 1/31/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 100 00 AP - 00247414 1/31/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 900 00 AP - 002474]4 1/31/2007 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 985 00 AP - 00247418 1/31/2007 LUCAS, LEAH 600 00 AP - 00247419 1/31/2007 LUCERO, MANUEL 40 00 AP - 00247420 1/31/2007 MACLI, MARIELA 2 07 AP - 00247420 1/31/2007 MACLI, MARIELA 72 00 AP - 00247421 1/31/2007 MAIN STREET SIGNS 797 35 AP - 00247421 1/31/2007 MAIN STREET SIGNS 431 00 AP - 00247423 1/31/2007 MANGINI, PAUL 5,000 00 AP - 00247424 1/31/2007 MANSOURI, IRAJ 4,200 00 AP - 00247426 1/31/2007 MARIN, MALINDA 98 18 AP - 00247427 1/31/2007 MARTINEZ, MARK 40 00 AP - 00247428 1/31/2007 MATHIS AND ASSOCIATES 692 00 AP - 00247428 1/31/2007 MATHIS AND ASSOCIATES 9,572 00 AP - 00247428 1/31/2007 MATHIS AND ASSOCIATES ]0,217 50 AP - 00247428 1/31/2007 MATHIS AND ASSOCIATES ] 1,504 50 AP - 00247429 1/31/2007 MICHAEL, L DENNIS 59 00 AP - 00247430 1/31/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 62 97 AP - 00247430 1/31/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 62 97 AP - 00247430 1/3]/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 61 97 AP - 00247430 1/31/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 43 98 AP - 00247430 1/31/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 21 99 AP - 00247430 1/31/2007 MIDWEST TAPE 21 99 AP - 00247431 1/31/2007 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 23 00 AP - 00247431 1/31/2007 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 23 00 AP - 00247431 1/31/2007 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 41 00 AP - 00247431 1/31/2007 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 23 00 AP - 00247432 1/31/2007 MINANO, DONNA MARIE 900 00 AP - 00247433 1/31/2007 MINANO, FRANK 1,500 00 User VLOPEZ - Veron ica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date• 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pomau Layout Ttme: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 1/31/2007 ttuough 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247434 1/31/2007 MMASC 215 00 AP - 00247435 1/31/2007 MMASC 65 00 AP - 00247437 1/31/2007 MOORE, RACHEL 40 00 AP - 00247438 1/31/2007 MULTICELL WIRELESS INC 11 60 AP - 00247439 1/31/2007 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 425 78 AP - 00247440 1/31/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 22 78 AP - 00247440 1/31/2007 NAPA AUTO PARTS 130 55 AP - 00247441 1/31/2007 NASH, JESSICA 1,131 75 AP - 00247442 1/31/2007 NATIONAL DEFERRED 21,788 OS AP - 00247443 1/31/2007 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 33,840 00 AP - 00247443 1/31/2007 NESTOR TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 33,840 00 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 646 49 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -646 49 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 26 OS AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT ] 0 02 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 11 77 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 35 S6 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 31 04 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 12 12 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 23 96 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 14 86 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 24 98 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -11 77 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 23 73 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -12 74 AP - 00247445 ]/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -3 06 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 24 75 AP - 00247445 1 /31 /2007 OFFICE DEPOT 312 96 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 144 37 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 18 32 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -6S 73 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT ~ 146 73 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 290 50 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 256 38 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 142 78 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 87 11 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 53 39 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 20 81 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 7 64 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 11 77 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 30 39 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT ]0 97 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 40 52 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 6 69 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 40 81 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 45 03 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 20 85 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 222 13 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 59 59 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2 63 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 11 86 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 189 87 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 48 77 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 16 82 P77 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page• 8 Current Date. 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P78 Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 28 08 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -75 09 AP - 00247445 ]/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 19 51 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 32 44 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 122 35 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 126 50 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 327 53 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 112 24 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 173 37 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 34 98 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 163 92 AP - 00247445 1/31/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 634 30 AP - 00247446 1/31/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC 221 67 AP - 00247446 1/31/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC 48 97 AP - 00247446 1/31/2007 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS INC 278 00 AP - 00247447 1/31/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 68 69 AP - 00247447 1/31/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 2 13 AP - 00247447 1/31/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 85 92 AP - 00247447 1/31/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 5 50 AP - 00247447 1/31/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 281 17 AP - 00247447 1/31/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 173 49 AP - 00247447 1/31/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 187 O1 AP - 00247447 1/31/2007 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 18 85 AP - 00247448 1/31/2007 OTT, LAURA 459 00 AP - 00247448 1/31/2007 OTT, LAURA 165 75 AP - 00247448 1/31/2007 OTT, LAURA 171 00 AP - 00247450 1/31/2007 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 81,187 14 AP - 00247450 1/31/2007 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 289 99 AP - 00247451 1/31/2007 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 33,917 29 AP - 00247451 1/31/2007 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 1,317 45 AP - 00247452 1/31/2007 PANTAGES THEATRE 3,229 74 AP - 00247453 1/31/2007 PARKER DIRECTORY 80 09 AP - 00247454 1/31/2007 PATTI, LINDA 52 00 AP - 00247455 1/31/2007 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 76 00 AP - 00247455 1/31/2007 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 75 00 AP - 00247455 1/31/2007 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 75 00 AP - 00247455 1/31/2007 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 150 00 AP - 00247455 1/31/2007 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 225 00 AP - 00247455 1/31/2007 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 150 00 AP - 00247455 1/31/2007 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 75 00 AP - 00247457 1/31/2007 PEP BOYS 47 21 AP - 00247457 1/31/2007 PEP BOYS 48 66 AP - 00247458 1/31/2007 PEREZ, GLADYS 500 00 AP - 00247459 1/31/2007 PETERMAN LUMBER INC 109 37 AP - 00247460 1/31/2007 PETERSON, JILL 20 00 AP - 00247461 ]/31/2007 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 232 81 AP - 00247462 1/31/2007 PHONG, BRYAN 100 00 AP - 00247462 1/31/2007 PHONG, BRYAN 100 00 AP - 00247463 1/31/2007 PIETRZAK, ELIZABETH 200 00 AP - 00247464 1/31/2007 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 1,370 00 AP - 00247464 1/31/2007 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 93 98 AP - 00247464 1/31/2007 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 518 00 AP - 00247466 1/31/2007 POIRIER, ROSE 25 00 AP - 00247467 1/31/2007 POMONA PRINT STOP t34 69 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date• 02/14/200 ReporCCK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK Agenda Check Regtster Portrait Layout Time 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247468 1/31/2007 PONGAN, EPHRANY 500 00 AP - 00247469 1/31/2007 POSTER SOLUTIONS 124 47 AP - 00247470 1/31/2007 POUK AND STEINLE INC 21,721 27 AP - 00247471 1/31/2007 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 200 03 AP - 00247472 ]/31/2007 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 34 20 AP - 00247473 1/31/2007 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,915 90 AP - 00247474 1/31/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 35 18 AP - 00247474 1/31/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 150 23 AP - 00247474 1/31/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 35 18 AP - 00247474 1/31/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 81 73 AP - 00247474 1/31/2007 RANDOM HOUSE INC 81 73 AP - 00247475 1/31/2007 RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 357 75 AP - 00247476 1/31/2007 RCPFA 7,048 48 AP - 00247477 1/31/2007 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 385 00 AP - 00247478 1/31/2007 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 294 78 AP - 00247478 1/31/2007 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 660 00 AP - 00247479 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 140 06 AP - 00247479 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 146 53 AP - 00247479 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 174 00 AP - 00247479 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 146 53 AP - 00247479 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 199 87 AP - 00247479 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 146 53 AP - 00247480 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200 00 AP - 00247480 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200 00 AP - 00247480 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200 00 AP - 00247480 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 155 16 AP - 00247480 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200 00 AP - 00247480 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 200 00 AP - 00247480 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 130 38 AP - 00247450 1/31/2007 RED WING SHOE STORE 164 86 AP - 00247481 1/31/2007 REGENTS UC 150 00 AP - 00247483 1/31/2007 REMEDY 456 20 AP - 00247484 1/31/2007 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 927 25 AP - 00247485 1/31/2007 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 32 09 AP - 00247485 1/31/2007 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 2,390 00 AP - 00247486 1/31/2007 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 174 50 AP - 00247486 1/31/2007 ROBLES SR RAUL P 72 00 AP - 00247487 1/31/2007 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 240 00 AP - 00247487 1/31/2007 RODRIGUEZ INC, R Y 2,029 29 AP - 00247488 1/31/2007 RODRIGUEZ, BARBARA 500 00 AP - 00247489 1/31/2007 ROSALES, ALEX 100 00 AP - 00247490 1/31/2007 ROTARY CORPORATION 545 82 AP - 00247490 1!31/2007 ROTARY CORPORATION 7 81 AP - 00247490 U31/2007 ROTARY CORPORATION 988 88 AP - 00247491 1/31/2007 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 1,179 87 AP - 00247492 1/31/2007 SALMAN, CHAUNCEY 50 00 AP - 00247495 1/31/2007 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 186 83 AP - 00247496 1/31/2007 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600 00 AP - 00247496 1/31/2007 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 600 00 AP - 00247497 1/31/2007 SANCHEZ, ELISABETH 105 00 AP - 00247498 1/31/2007 SANDERS, DEBBIE 110 00 AP - 00247499 1/31/2007 SCHRADER, ALLISON 480 00 AP - 00247500 1/31/2007 SCLLN INC 210 00 AP - 00247501 1/31/2007 SHEA INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 750 00 P79 User• VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page. 10 Current Date• 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Regtster Pomait Layout T~me• 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247502 1/31/2007 SIGN SHOP, THE 1,185 25 AP - 00247503 1 /31 /2007 SIMMONS, ARLENE 344 00 AP - 00247504 1/31/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 627 64 AP - 00247504 1/31/2007 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,099 OS AP - 00247505 1/31/2007 SING A LONG PRODUCTIONS LTD 1 894 04 AP - 00247507 1/31/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 209 10 AP - 00247507 1/31/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC -54 28 AP - 00247507 1/31/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 810 34 AP - 00247507 1/31/2007 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 186 55 AP - 00247508 1/31/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 3,309 64 AP - 00247508 1/31/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 718 34 AP - 00247508 1/31/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,574 64 AP - 00247508 1/31/2007 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 555 65 AP - 00247509 1/3]/2007 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 224 79 AP - 00247509 1/31/2007 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 449 58 AP - 00247509 1/31/2007 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,439 55 AP - 00247509 1/31/2007 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 1,348 74 AP - 00247509 1/31/2007 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 224 79 AP - 00247509 1/31/2007 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 224 79 AP - 00247509 1/31/2007 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 315 60 AP - 00247510 1/31/2007 SOUNDZSKILZ ENTERTAINMENT INC 300 00 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 41 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFOIL'~IL4 EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/3]/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 171 66 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 44 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118 44 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 21 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 46 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22 43 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16 87 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134 67 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65 10 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22 92 AP - 00247513 1/3]/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18 52 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74 16 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105 58 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85 41 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 96 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 420 61 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 P80 User: VLOPEZ - Verontca Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p$~ Asenda Check Resister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Nante Amount AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 50 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 439 44 AP - 00247513 ]/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104 84 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75 39 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106 34 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN` CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 09 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 167 71 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 39 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 63 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 63 AP - 00247513 ]/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78 38 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32 08 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15 30 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 002475 ] 3 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110 25 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96 98 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 63 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145 97 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123 07 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133 85 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 OS AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60 17 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 09 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 09 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11 53 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79 48 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 90 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38 43 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 159 84 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 596 29 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 144 15 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115 52 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 11 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27 57 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140 63 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106 18 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35 00 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 642 88 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90 OS AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 168 90 AP - 00247513 1/3]/2007 SOUTIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 User VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 02/14/200 ReporLCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pomatt Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15 66 AP - 00247513 1/3 ]/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85 02 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100 92 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 306 23 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82 08 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 157 87 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41 60 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53 58 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70 72 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 146 95 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 81 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247513 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247514 1/31/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,474 65 AP - 00247515 1/31/2007 SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 175 60 AP - 00247517 1/31/2007 SPYGLASS PROPERTIES 74 00 AP - 00247518 1/31/2007 STAEHLER, OLIVIA 78 00 AP - 00247519 1/31/2007 STAUFFER, DONALD M 40 50 AP - 00247520 1/31/2007 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 54,955 76 AP - 00247520 1/31/2007 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 56,512 50 AP - 00247520 ]/31/2007 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -5,495 58 AP - 00247520 1/31/2007 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -5,651 25 AP - 00247521 1/31/2007 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 412 62 AP - 00247521 1/31/2007 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 134 50 AP - 00247522 1/31/2007 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 125 00 AP - 00247523 ]/31/2007 STIRLIN BURK, TREVOR 570 00 AP - 00247524 1/31/2007 STONE ROOFING 6,711 00 AP - 00247526 1/31/2007 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,239 13 AP - 00247526 1/31/2007 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,239 13 AP - 00247527 1/31/2007 SUAREZ, FRED 25 00 AP - 00247529 1/31/2007 SUN, THE 165 60 AP - 00247530 1/31/2007 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 750 00 AP - 00247531 1/31/2007 SUNRISE FORD 227 35 AP - 00247531 1/31/2007 SUNRISE FORD 227 Ol AP - 00247532 1/31/2007 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 129 30 AP - 00247533 1/31/2007 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 994 47 AP - 00247533 1/31/2007 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 184 69 AP - 00247534 1/31/2007 TALAVERA, LAWERENCE 105 00 AP - 00247535 1/31/2007 THOMSON GALE 54 OS AP - 00247537 1/31/2007 TOOLS R US 75 30 AP - 00247537 1/31/2007 TOOLS R US 499 10 AP - 00247538 1/31/2007 TORRES, ROSALBA 17 70 AP - 00247539 1/31/2007 TRAK ENGINEERING INC 2 291 25 AP - 00247540 1/31/2007 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER ]0 04 AP - 00247541 1/31/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,454 97 AP - 0024754] 1/31/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 764 45 AP - 00247541 1/31/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,800 00 AP - 00247541 1/31/2007 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,193 09 AP - 00247542 1/31/2007 TURCH AND ASSOCIATES, DAVID 12,000 00 AP - 00247543 1/31/2007 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 152 00 AP - 00247544 1/31/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 709 14 P82 User. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Current Date• 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Regtster Pornatt Layout Ttme. 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247544 1/31/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 493 68 AP - 00247544 1/31/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 883 08 AP - 00247544 1/31/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 481 68 AP - 00247544 1/31/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 990 12 AP - 00247544 1/31/2007 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC 669 00 AP - 00247545 1/31/2007 UNGASHICK, NLIE 40 00 AP - 00247546 1/31/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 816 78 AP - 00247546 1/31/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53 42 AP - 00247546 1/31/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 51 42 AP - 00247546 1/31/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 759 77 AP - 00247546 1/31/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 28 94 AP - 00247546 1/31/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 131 57 AP - 00247546 1/31/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 28 94 AP - 00247546 1/3 ]/2007 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 286 O1 AP - 00247547 1/31/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 1,951 62 AP - 00247548 1/31/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 3,484 72 AP - 00247548 1/31/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 40,072 73 AP - 00247549 1/31/2007 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 548 32 AP - 00247550 1/31/2007 UNITED ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS INC 449 75 AP - 00247551 1/31/2007 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS 290 70 AP - 00247552 1/31/2007 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 217 78 AP - 00247553 1/31/2007 UNITED WAY 21 00 AP - 00247554 1/31/2007 UPS 21 51 AP - 00247554 1/31/2007 UPS 30 16 AP - 00247556 1/31/2007 VANIPARO LLC 9,300 00 AP - 00247557 1/31/2007 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 379 09 AP - 00247558 1/31/2007 VEND U COMPANY 82 61 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 82 75 AP-00247561 1/3]/2007 VERIZON 2989 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 29 90 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 29 89 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 29 89 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 89 72 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 89 71 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 19 70 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 19 70 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 89 96 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 31 15 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 20 36 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 28 97 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 19 70 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 19 70 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 28 98 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 19 70 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 19 70 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 421 ]9 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 28 64 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 89 96 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 28 98 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 162 43 AP -00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 28 97 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 57 43 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 19 70 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 29 90 P83 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Current Date: 02/14/200 ReporhCK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P84 Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 29 93 AP-00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 4126 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 30 65 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 89 71 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 89 71 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 205 52 AP - 0024756] 1/31/2007 VERIZON 570 85 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 129 80 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 19 70 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 31 50 AP - 00247561 1/31/2007 VERIZON 44 33 AP - 00247562 1/31/2007 VERNON LIBRARY SUPPLIES INC 529 95 AP - 00247563 1/31/2007 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 141 41 AP - 00247564 1/31/2007 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500 00 AP - 00247565 1/31/2007 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 9,426 72 AP - 00247566 1/31/2007 VISTA PAINT 560 30 AP - 00247566 1/31/2007 VISTA PAINT 140 08 AP - 00247566 1/31/2007 VISTA PAINT 7 74 AP - 00247568 1/31/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 75 43 AP - 00247568 1/31/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 226 28 AP - 00247568 1/31/2007 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 50 Ol AP - 00247569 1/31/2007 WARREN & CO INC, CARL 385 60 AP - 00247570 1/3]/2007 WARREN, GRACE 250 00 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 521 08 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 5 36 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 752 29 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 681 86 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,332 76 AP - 00247571 1/31/2007 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 40 08 AP - 00247572 1/31/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 664 32 AP - 00247573 1/31/2007 WEST VALLEY SENIOR CONCERN 3,000 00 AP-00247574 1/31/2007 WEST,SHAWANDA 25000 AP - 00247575 1/31/2007 WESTCOAST MEDIA 735 00 AP - 00247575 1/31/2007 WESTCOAST MEDIA 735 00 AP - 00247576 1/31/2007 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 844 29 AP - 00247576 1/31/2007 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 3 81 AP - 00247576 1/31/2007 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 198 32 AP - 00247576 1/31/2007 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC -217 28 AP - 00247577 1/31/2007 WHITTLER FERTILIZER 603 40 AP - 00247577 1/31/2007 WHITTLER FERTILIZER 490 26 AP - 00247578 1/31/2007 WHOSTON, COLLEEN 100 00 AP - 00247579 1/31/2007 WILLIAMS PHOTOGRAPHY, CHRIS 120 00 AP - 00247579 1/31/2007 WILLIAMS PHOTOGRAPHY, CHRIS 175 00 AP - 00247579 1/31/2007 WILLIAMS PHOTOGRAPHY, CHRIS 120 00 AP - 00247580 1/31/2007 WILLIAMS, FRENAE 40 00 AP - 00247581 1/31/2007 WILLIAMS, TAMMY 100 00 AP - 00247582 ]/31/2007 WON RO, SOON 40 00 AP - 00247583 ]/31/2007 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 700 00 AP - 00247583 1/31/2007 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 700 00 AP - 00247584 1/31/2007 ZEE MEDICAL INC 49 56 AP - 00247584 1/31/2007 ZEE MEDICAL INC 64 44 AP - 00247585 2/7/2007 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 7,726 75 AP - 00247586 2/7/2007 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 4,025 45 AP - 00247587 2/7/2007 ABC LOCKSMITHS 142 55 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pomait Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P85 Asenda Check Resister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247588 2/7/2007 ABLAC 217 58 AP - 00247589 2/7/2007 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 390 00 AP - 00247590 2/7/2007 AFLAC 3 197 42 AP - 00247591 2/7/2007 AIRGAS WEST 34 78 AP - 00247591 2/7/2007 AIRGAS WEST 33 90 AP - 00247592 2/7/2007 ALEXANDER HAMILTON INSTITUTE INC 38 20 AP - 00247593 2/7/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 14,527 77 AP - 00247593 2/7/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 14,445 03 AP - 00247593 2/7/2007 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 12,324 81 AP - 00247594 2/7/2007 ALL WELDING 628 00 AP - 00247594 2/7/2007 ALL WELDING 50 00 AP - 00247594 2/7/2007 ALL WELDING 250 00 AP - 00247595 2/7/2007 ALPHAGRAPHICS 628 96 AP - 00247595 2/7/2007 ALPHAGRAPHICS 1,077 50 AP - 00247595 2/7/2007 ALPHAGRAPHICS 45 26 AP - 00247595 2/7/2007 ALPHAGRAPHICS 628 96 AP - 00247596 2/7/2007 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 5,550 00 AP - 00247596 2/7/2007 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 5,550 00 AP - 00247597 2/7/2007 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 405 00 AP - 00247598 2/7/2007 AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO INC 249 28 AP - 00247599 2/7/2007 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 191 99 AP - 00247600 2/7/2007 ANDRADE, LAINI 8 73 AP - 00247601 2/7/2007 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( 607 39 AP - 00247601 2/7/2007 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES (A( -436 15 AP - 00247602 2/7/2007 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 1,229 75 AP - 00247603 2/7/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 6 70 AP - 00247603 2/7/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 6 70 AP - 00247605 2/7/2007 ASCE 154 00 AP - 00247606 2/7/2007 ASSI SECURITY 105 00 AP - 00247607 2/7/2007 ASSOCIATED GROUP 366 33 AP - 00247608 2/7/2007 AT&T LONG DISTANCE -3 46 AP - 00247608 2/7/2007 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 1,131 99 AP - 00247609 2/7/2007 AT&T 55 15 AP - 00247609 2/7/2007 AT&T 55 15 AP - 00247610 2/7/2007 ATANDA, MARY 100 00 AP - 00247611 2/7/2007 AUTO BODY 2000 176 00 AP - 00247611 2/7/2007 AUTO BODY 2000 855 08 AP - 00247611 2/7/2007 AUTO BODY 2000 895 75 AP - 00247612 2/7/2007 AVANTS, MARGE 105 00 AP - 00247613 2/7/2007 AVELAR, WENDY 18,000 00 AP - 00247614 2/7/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 63 02 AP - 00247614 2/7/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 181 93 AP - 00247614 2/7/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 286 82 AP - 00247614 2/7/2007 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 59 20 AP - 00247615 2/7/2007 BAKER, PADDY 40 00 AP - 00247616 2/7/2007 BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC 461 33 AP - 00247617 2/7/2007 BCT ENTERTAINMENT 626 03 AP - 002476] 8 2/7/2007 BELL, MAUREEN 60 00 AP - 00247619 2/7/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 21,301 87 AP - 00247619 2/7/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -4,297 70 AP - 00247619 2/7/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -573 79 AP - 00247619 2/7/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION -2,130 19 AP - 00247619 2/7/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 42,977 00 AP - 00247619 2/7/2007 BERGELECTRIC CORPORATION 5,737 92 User. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Current Date• 02/14/200 Report•CK_AGENDA_REG _PORTRAI T_RC - CK Agenda Check Regrster Portrait Layout T~me• 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A>?enda Check ReP_ister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247620 2/7/2007 BERNAL, SALVADOR 250 00 AP - 00247621 2/7/2007 BPS TACTICAL EVC 211 19 AP - 00247622 2/7/2007 BRANCH, RICKY 88 00 AP - 00247623 2/7/2007 BRYANT, GERRI IRIS 150 00 AP - 00247624 2/7/2007 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 66 75 AP - 00247624 2/7/2007 CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 66 75 AP - 00247625 2/7/2007 CALHOUN, JOHN 30 00 AP - 00247625 2/7/2007 CALHOUN, JOHN 70 00 AP - 00247626 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 240 00 AP - 00247626 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 150 00 AP - 00247627 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 94,368 55 AP - 00247628 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 75 00 AP - 00247629 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 25 00 AP - 00247630 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 53 25 AP - 00247630 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 251 30 AP - 00247630 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 25 25 AP - 00247630 2/7/2007 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 37 25 AP - 00247631 2/7/2007 CASTILLO, JESSIE 250 00 AP - 00247632 2/7/2007 CELSOC 401 60 AP - 00247632 2/7/2007 CELSOC 551 75 AP - 00247633 2/7/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 106 42 AP - 00247633 2/7/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 226 28 AP - 00247633 2/7/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 211 84 AP - 00247633 2/7/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 244 OS AP - 00247633 2/7/2007 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS INC 61 42 AP - 00247634 2/7/2007 CENTURY 21 GRACE REALTY 250 00 AP - 00247635 2/7/2007 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 12 93 AP - 00247635 2/7/2007 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 17 24 AP - 00247635 2/7/2007 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 134 69 AP - 00247635 2/7/2007 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 87 27 AP - 00247635 2/7/2007 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALIES 84 OS AP - 00247637 2/7/2007 CLAIREMONT EQUIPMENT COMPANY 772 20 AP - 00247638 2/7/2007 CLUFF, MICHAEL 40 50 AP - 00247639 2/7/2007 COLLETTE, PETE 15 00 AP - 00247640 2/7/2007 CONEY, CRISTY 223 00 AP - 00247641 2/7/2007 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] 181 56 AP - 00247642 2/7/2007 COOPER, CHERYL 564 60 AP - 00247643 2/7/2007 CORAL POWER LLC 224,841 76 AP - 00247645 2/7/2007 COUNTRY SUPPLY 73 89 AP - 00247646 2/7/2007 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 270 00 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5, 113 18 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 384 82 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 248 06 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 445 27 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 62] 02 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 484 94 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142 78 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 864 20 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 270 74 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 163 70 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 855 92 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 67 00 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73 60 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73 60 P86 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Current Date. 02/14/200 Report•CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pomart Layout Time• 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P87 Agenda Check Register 1/3]/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 607 16 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 201 44 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73 60 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 184 70 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129 62 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 307 28 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,134 99 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 67 70 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 41 24 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 135 92 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 105 68 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 331 28 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 151 60 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 67 70 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 597 73 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,875 67 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142 22 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 230 42 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 108 20 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 188 90 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1 30 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55 20 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 200 96 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 342 56 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 501 32 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72 74 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 148 58 AP - 00247648 2/7/2007 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 970 48 AP - 00247651 2/7/2007 DAPPER TIRE CO 494 81 AP - 00247652 2/7/2007 DAZALLA, MICHELLE 140 00 AP - 00247653 2/7/2007 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 1,906 25 AP - 00247653 2/7/2007 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 707 14 AP - 00247653 2/7/2007 DELTA MICROIMAGING INC 678 40 AP - 00247654 2/7/2007 DEPARTMENT ISSUE INCORPORATED 425 34 AP - 00247655 2/7/2007 DIRECTV 67 47 AP - 00247656 2/7/2007 DMC ADVERTISING 5,000 00 AP - 00247657 2/7/2007 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 215 77 AP - 00247657 2/7/2007 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 320 IS AP - 00247658 2/7/2007 EASTERLING, RAY 200 00 AP - 00247659 2/7/2007 EDFUND 65 OS AP - 00247660 2/7/2007 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE 36 16 AP - 00247661 2/7/2007 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 342 65 AP - 00247662 2/7/2007 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 4,579 88 AP - 00247664 2/7/2007 ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 630 00 AP - 00247665 2/7/2007 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 164 86 AP - 00247665 2/7/2007 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 19 40 AP - 00247666 2/7/2007 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 46 44 AP - 00247667 2/7/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18 52 AP - 00247667 2/7/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 20 87 AP - 00247667 2/7/2007 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 23 35 AP - 00247668 2/7/2007 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 33 94 AP - 00247669 2/7/2007 FILARSKY AND WATT 3,972 00 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,800 00 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,521 94 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Curren[ Date: 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Regtster Poman Layout Ttme: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pgg Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 832 00 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,278 00 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,400 00 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,399 88 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,576 00 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,514 63 AP - 00247670 2/7/2007 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 1,840 00 AP - 00247672 2/7/2007 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 726 25 AP - 00247673 2/7/2007 FLOT, CHRISTINE 90 00 AP - 00247674 2/7/2007 FOOTHILL LAWNMOWER 408 37 AP - 00247675 2/7/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 189 55 AP - 00247675 2/7/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 94 78 AP - 00247675 2/7/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 310 28 AP - 00247675 2/7/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 153 29 AP - 00247675 2/7/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 754 64 AP - 00247675 2/7/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 65 88 AP - 00247675 2/7/2007 FORD OF UPLAND INC 310 28 AP - 00247676 2/7/2007 FOX, VICKY 82 50 AP - 00247677 2/7/2007 GAYLORD BROTHERS 35 66 AP - 00247677 2/7/2007 GAYLORD BROTHERS 39 26 AP - 00247677 2/7/2007 GAYLORD BROTHERS 106 52 AP - 00247678 2/7/2007 GEOGRAPHICS 3,055 72 AP - 00247679 2/7/2007 GILKEY, JOHN 150 00 AP - 00247680 2/7/2007 GILLIAM, JOHN 245 00 AP - 00247681 2/7/2007 GOLDEN STATE FIRE PROTECTION 3,288 50 AP - 00247682 2/7/2007 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000 00 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 124 28 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 164 31 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 40 89 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 158 67 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 151 95 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 65 27 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 16 77 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 11 1 ] AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 41 35 AP - 00247683 2/7/2007 GRAINGER 78 60 AP - 00247685 2/7/2007 GTSI CORD 750 90 AP - 00247686 2/7/2007 GUARDIAN 3,395 60 AP - 00247687 2/7/2007 GUTIERREZ, BIANCA 330 00 AP - 00247688 2/7/2007 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 225 00 AP - 00247689 2/7/2007 HANSON, BARRYE 25 00 AP - 00247690 2/7/2007 HAWTHORNE, WAGNER 250 00 AP - 00247691 2/7/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 78 24 AP - 00247691 2/7/2007 HCS CUTLER STEEL CO 30 56 AP - 00247693 2/7/2007 HENELY INC, BRYAN 1,000 00 AP - 00247694 2/7/2007 HEPNER, MIREYA 42 80 AP - 00247694 2/7/2007 HEPNER, MIREYA 23 96 AP - 00247695 2/7/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 123 54 AP - 00247695 2/7/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 134 69 AP - 00247695 2/7/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 59 89 AP - 00247695 2/7/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 21 61 AP - 00247695 2/7/2007 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 156 58 AP - 00247698 2/7/2007 HURST, CHERYL 288 50 AP - 00247699 2/7/2007 IKEDA, JOHN 150 00 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page. 19 Current Date. 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Ttme. 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247700 2/7/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 588 27 AP - 00247700 2/7/2007 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 629 61 AP - 00247701 2/7/2007 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIC 272 73 AP - 00247702 2/7/2007 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 907 00 AP - 00247704 2/7/2007 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 30 80 AP - 00247705 2/7/2007 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 115 OS AP - 00247707 2/7/2007 J D C INC 4,998 50 AP - 00247708 2/7/2007 JACKSON, HUGH 10 00 AP - 00247709 2/7/2007 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 2,465 55 AP - 00247710 2/7/2007 JOHNSON, PAULA 300 00 AP - 00247711 2/7/2007 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,931 45 AP - 00247712 2/7/2007 K K WOODWORKING 37 70 AP - 00247713 2/7/2007 KCR CONCEPTS INC 4,842 75 AP - 00247714 2/7/2007 KENDALL, THOMAS 418 00 AP - 00247716 2/7/2007 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 2,062 34 AP - 00247717 2/7/2007 KUNICK, CONNIE 15 00 AP - 00247718 2/7/2007 LA FRENZ, CHARLENE 24 00 AP - 00247719 2/7/2007 LABARDA, MELISSA 250 00 AP - 00247720 2/7/2007 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 345 00 AP - 00247721 2/7/2007 LANE, NICOLE 348 66 AP - 00247722 2/7/2007 LARA, CARMEN 31 00 AP - 00247723 2/7/2007 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC 361 72 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 1,222 15 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 20 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 5,827 25 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 21 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 20 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 20 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 20 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 21 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 21 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 1,942 41 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 20 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 5,827 23 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 971 20 AP - 00247725 2/7/2007 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC 1,942 41 AP - 00247726 2/7/2007 LGC HOMECOMING AT TERRA VISTA LLC 1,000 00 AP - 00247728 2/7/2007 LORDS MIGHTY ARMY 162 50 AP - 00247728 2/7/2007 LORDS MIGHTY ARMY 87 50 AP - 00247729 2/7/2007 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO 369 90 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 20 06 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 192 09 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 100 00 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 21 52 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 4 28 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 96 65 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 171 51 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 12 80 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 57 19 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC ] 0 70 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 70 82 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 93 90 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 16 81 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 108 70 P89 User• VLOPEZ - Verontca Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report.CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pomatt Layout T~me• 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pgp A¢enda Check Ret=tster 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 52 70 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 4 83 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 9 34 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 142 S1 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 14 7S AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 9 SO AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 44 29 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 21 38 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 61 26 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 18 97 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 135 S4 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 6 S6 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 12 87 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 116 90 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 112 S2 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOW'ES COMPANIES INC SO 73 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 17 19 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 27 8S AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 100 00 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 48 66 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 21 S2 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 21 21 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 1S7 09 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 8 S3 AP - 00247731 2/7/2007 LOWES COMPANIES INC 51 64 AP - 00247733 2/7/2007 LUCATERQ, EDUARDO 250 00 AP - 00247734 2/7/2007 MAIN' STREET SIGNS 60 56 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,446 31 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 132 07 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC SS4 79 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 484 83 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 83S 03 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 66 S9 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 982 37 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 132 82 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 9,310 16 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 66 04 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,710 11 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 8SS 31 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,368 46 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC S10 S9 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 63 88 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,323 84 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULI'T JRAL ENT INC 30 86 AP - 00247735 2/7/2007 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 330 S2 AP - 00247736 2/7/2007 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 297 70 AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 213 00 AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 568 40 AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -109 20 AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 436 80 AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -]42 10 AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -37 25 AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -53 2S AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 101 00 User• VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report•CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 13 S7 S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pg7 Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING -2S 25 AP - 00247737 2/7/2007 MARSHALL PLUMBING 149 00 AP - 00247738 2/7/2007 MARTIN, ED 210 00 AP - 00247738 2/7/2007 MARTIN, ED 330 00 AP - 00247739 2/7/2007 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B 1,075 78 AP - 00247739 2/7/2007 MCGALLIARD & SONS INC, J B -107 58 AP - 00247740 2/7/2007 MCI 412 56 AP - 00247741 2/7/2007 MCKENZIE, SUSAN 64 00 AP - 00247742 2/7/2007 MCKNIGHT, MARK 500 00 AP - 00247743 2/7/2007 MEDIBAG 900 00 AP - 00247744 2/7/2007 MICHAEL, L DENNIS 129 50 AP - 00247745 2/7/2007 MICRO CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL 258 58 AP - 00247746 2/7/2007 MMASC 150 00 AP - 00247747 2/7/2007 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 90 51 AP - 00247748 2/7/2007 HURRAY & ASSOCIATES, BOB 150 59 AP - 00247748 2/7/2007 HURRAY & ASSOCIATES, BOB 225 87 AP - 00247749 2/7/2007 NAFFZIGER, MICHAEL 175 50 AP - 00247751 2/7/2007 NATIONAL DEFERRED 29,542 00 AP - 00247752 2/7/2007 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 360 00 AP - 00247753 2/7/2007 NEVCO 250 00 AP - 00247754 2/7/2007 NEXTEL 689 41 AP - 00247755 2/7/2007 NIKPOUR, MOHAMMED 168 00 AP - 00247756 2/7/2007 NJOKI, BETZY 250 00 AP - 00247758 2/7/2007 NOVELTY PRINTING 215 50 AP - 00247759 2/7/2007 NPI PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 35,236 00 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 89 97 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 378 20 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 207 73 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 37 12 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 27 19 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 10 12 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 12 52 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2 72 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 29 60 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 4 39 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2 77 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 72 65 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 37 48 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 44 25 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 35 00 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 82 82 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 18 ]0 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 14 07 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 63 20 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 108 56 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -42 94 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 46 28 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2 83 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 5 69 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 1 51 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 344 75 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 9 74 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT -580 88 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 56 07 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pomart Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Resister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 3 75 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 21 67 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 6 95 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 2,606 69 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 5 04 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 121 93 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 697 44 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 13 19 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 22 71 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 79 54 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 44 26 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 80 03 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 72 13 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 327 90 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 243 97 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 131 49 AP - 00247761 2/7/2007 OFFICE DEPOT 86 19 AP - 00247762 2/7/2007 OFFICE TEAM 327 25 AP - 00247762 2/7/2007 OFFICE TEAM 336 60 AP - 00247762 2/7/2007 OFFICE TEAM 327 25 AP - 00247763 2/7/2007 OMNITRANS 312 00 AP - 00247764 2/7/2007 OPEN APPS 405 00 AP - 00247765 2/7/2007 OTT, SHARON 207 00 AP - 00247766 2/7/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 900 00 AP - 00247766 2/7/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 869 84 AP - 00247766 2/7/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 75 00 AP - 00247766 2/7/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 120 83 AP - 00247766 2/7/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 187 50 AP - 00247766 2/7/2007 OWEN ELECTRIC INC 25 29 AP - 00247767 2/7/2007 PAL CAMPAIGN 132 39 AP - 00247768 2/7/2007 PALLOTTO, KRISTINA 56 26 AP - 00247769 2/7/2007 PALOMINO, LUIS 250 00 AP - 00247770 2/7/2007 PEP BOYS 60 64 AP - 00247772 2/7/2007 PHONG, BRYAN 100 00 AP - 00247773 2/7/2007 PILONIETA, MANUEL 200 00 AP - 00247774 2/7/2007 PILONIETA, MANUEL 27 65 AP - 00247776 2/7/2007 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 7,443 96 AP - 00247776 2/7/2007 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 9,867 58 AP - 00247776 2/7/2007 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 10,995 60 AP - 00247776 2/7/2007 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,294 93 AP - 00247776 2/7/2007 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,672 42 AP - 00247776 2/7/2007 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 11,495 99 AP - 00247777 2/7/2007 POMONA ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC 691 86 AP - 00247778 2/7/2007 PORAC 160 00 AP - 00247779 2/7/2007 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 318 90 AP - 00247781 2/7/2007 QUINTANA, ZITA 193 00 AP - 00247782 2/7/2007 R H F INC 90 00 AP - 00247783 2/7/2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCI 30 00 AP - 00247784 2/7/2007 RANCHO EAST L P 200,000 00 AP - 00247785 2/7/2007 RASMUSSEN, MILT 400 00 AP - 00247787 2/7/2007 RESIDENTIAL FIRE SYSTEMS INC 1,219 91 AP - 00247788 2/7/2007 ROBLES, RAMON 96 00 AP - 00247789 2/7/2007 ROOK, STACY 40 00 AP - 00247790 2/7/2007 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 206 95 P92 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 23 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Ttme• 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247790 2/7/2007 SAFELITE GLASS CORP 483 88 AP - 00247791 2/7/2007 SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMEN 8,592 39 AP - 00247792 2/7/2007 SANTOS, MANNY 72 00 AP - 00247793 2/7/2007 SCHABARUM, CYNTHIA 24 00 AP - 00247794 2/7/2007 SCOTT, DIANA 375 00 AP - 00247795 2/7/2007 SHEA HOMES INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION 4,153 06 AP - 00247796 2/7/2007 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 135 00 AP - 00247797 2/7/2007 SILVA CONSTRUCTION 289 59 AP - 00247798 2/7/2007 SLUKA, SUSAN 124 46 AP - 00247799 2/7/2007 SMIDERLE, BEA 96 96 AP - 00247801 2/7/2007 SOHNS, MARGA 40 00 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52 20 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,491 75 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7 00 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141 04 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33 60 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142 96 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 212 87 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 91 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 188 38 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56 55 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27 15 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50 12 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 09 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNLA EDISON 478 31 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 92 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 75 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 38 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68 50 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 06 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26 84 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 06 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115 50 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102 77 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27 87 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 83 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47 39 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 843 44 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28,115 43 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 06 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 45 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 20 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 98 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 585 74 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96 82 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60 22 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 38 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91 70 P93 User. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page. 24 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Ttme: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pg4 Asenda Check Resister 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24 98 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 96 51 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118 86 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 25 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55 31 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77 22 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9 57 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40 37 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 127 93 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 38 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113 16 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15 10 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 48 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 80 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 83 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 191 79 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 20 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 55 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37 60 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 89 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22 46 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116 34 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91 85 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 89 35 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 83 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 38 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 38 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54 12 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87 39 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122 38 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110 16 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,098 21 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 202 23 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,064 63 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16 76 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125 90 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8 82 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 48 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 174 31 User• VLOPEZ -Veroni ca Lopez Page: 25 Current Date• 02/14/200 ReporLCK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Regtster Portrait Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pg5 Agenda Check Register 1/31/2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68 06 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 24 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14 14 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 66 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 10 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118 69 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13 12 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 81 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12 38 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,783 IS AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20 07 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20 06 AP - 00247805 2/7/2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150 02 AP - 00247806 2/7/2007 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 975 25 AP - 00247807 2/7/2007 SPAGNOLO, SAM 89 44 AP - 00247808 2/7/2007 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 631 62 AP - 00247809 2/7/2007 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 474 33 AP - 00247810 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 250 00 AP - 00247811 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 126 88 AP - 00247812 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 33 50 AP - 00247813 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 218 75 AP - 00247814 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 200 00 AP - 00247815 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 310 00 AP - 00247816 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 213 50 AP - 00247817 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 420 50 AP - 00247818 2/7/2007 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 271 50 AP - 00247819 2/7/2007 STERICYCLE INC 456 11 AP - 00247820 2/7/2007 STOFA, JOSEPH 14 00 AP - 00247821 2/7/2007 T MOBILE 246 07 AP - 00247821 2/7/2007 T MOBILE 138 58 AP - 00247822 2/7/2007 TAIKOPROJECT 12,000 00 AP - 00247823 2/7/2007 THEWES, KRISTINE 768 00 AP - 00247824 2/7/2007 TIME WARNER TELECOM 2,597 57 AP - 00247825 2/7/2007 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES INC 156 78 AP - 00247826 2/7/2007 TURNER PLAZA 67 00 AP - 00247827 2/7/2007 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 1,999 78 AP - 00247828 2/7/2007 UNITED WAY 367 82 AP - 00247829 2/7/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 179 85 AP - 00247829 2/7/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL -138 85 AP - 00247829 2/7/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 4,106 92 AP - 00247829 2/7/2007 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 21 67 AP - 00247830 2/7/2007 UPS 24 65 AP - 00247831 2/7/2007 VARNEY, SUSAN 1,000 00 AP - 00247832 2/7/2007 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 5,150 00 AP - 00247833 2/7/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 52 00 AP - 00247833 2/7/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 52 00 AP - 00247833 2/7/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 11 62 AP - 00247833 2/7/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 8,498 47 AP - 00247833 2/7/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 90 11 AP - 00247833 2/7/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 104 99 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 464 40 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 464 40 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 29 91 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 89 97 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date. 02/14/200 Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Pornau Layout Time: 13 57 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register ] /31 /2007 through 2/13/2007 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 180 90 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 29 90 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 27 99 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 33 54 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 27 99 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 59 80 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 29 91 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 33 58 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 20 27 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 28 46 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 298 30 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 21 82 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 87 44 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 89 98 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 89 97 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 86 98 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 89 73 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 168 98 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 28 99 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 89 73 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 325 55 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 29 90 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 89 98 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 89 73 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 395 47 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 312 23 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 29 90 AP - 00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 570 85 AP-00247835 2/7/2007 VERIZON 2,13419 AP - 00247836 2/7/2007 VERIZON 1,167 73 AP - 00247837 2/7/2007 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 125 00 AP - 00247838 2/7/2007 VILAN, MARCELLA 64 00 AP - 00247839 2/7/2007 VISTA PAINT 91 83 AP - 00247840 2/7/2007 VOLM, LIZA 1 ] 2 50 AP - 00247841 2/7/2007 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 200 18 AP - 00247842 2/7/2007 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 335 00 AP - 00247843 2/7/2007 WOLFF, STEVE 32 31 AP - 00247844 2/7/2007 YEE, LARRY 28 00 AP - 00247846 2/7/2007 US POSTMASTER 1,736 00 Total for Check ID AP: 2,145,475 24 Total for Enuh•: 2,145,475 24 P96 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Date: 02/14/200 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time 13 57 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2007 Gly of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Book % of Daye to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Matunty 360 Equiv 365 Equiv Local Agency Investment Fund 3667035546 3667035548 36,670,35546 1926 1 1 5085 5156 Commercial Paper -Discount 9,000 000 00 8,946,520 83 8,946,520 83 4 70 41 15 5 248 5 321 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 124,265 000 00 122 449,457 75 124,201,105 00 65 23 1 480 394 3 421 3 469 Treasury Securities-Coupon 5,000,00000 4971,87500 498554688 262 1,070 103 3164 3229 Investment Agreements 15,600,00000 1560000000 15,60000000 819 1,826 993 3682 3733 190,535,355 46 168,638,209 04 190,403,528 17 100 00% 1,145 342 3 843 3 896 Investments Cash Passbook/Checking 684,512 79 684 512 79 684 512 79 1 1 0 493 0 500 (not mcludetl in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 191,219,868 25 189,322,721 83 191,088,040 96 1,145 342 3 843 3 896 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 619,981 i6 4,113,99844 Average Dally Balance 190,623,784 76 188,590,783 24 Effective Rate of Return 3 83%, 3 70°/ I certfy that this report accurately refl ects all Cdy pooled Investments and Is in cemformdy wdh the Investment policy adopted Dece mber 20, 2006 A copy of the Investment pokcy Is availab le in the Administrative Services Department The Investment Program herein show n provides sufficient cash flow Ilquidi ty to meet the neat six months estimated expenditures The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Dala Corporation pnpng service The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end Is provided under the Clty official Investment Policy The provisions of the Individual bond documents govern the management of these funds On October 21, 2004 the Clty entered into a Investment Agreement with Aegon/Transamerlce In the amount of $15,600,000 The Investment Agreement will earn interest at 6 00% per annum through June 26, 2006 to provide funding for specific expenditures during that period Beginning June 29, 2006 through October 21, 2009, the Investment Agreement will earn interest at 2 1 °' FP~e average annual rate of return over the five year p riod Is 3 682% which is incorporated in the annual rate of return noted above -Sa L/4~o7 mes Frost, Trea r Reporting period 0110112007-0113112007 Run Date 02/13r2007 - 1 ] 09 Portfolio CITY CP PM IPRF PM1)SymRepi6412025 ~ Report Ver 500 V City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfollo Details -Investments January 31, 2007 Page 2 Average Purchase Statetl YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investmen[# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYSDOOOS OOD05 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal and Average 70,021,03417 36,670 355 46 36,670,355 46 3fi 870,355 46 5 156 5 085 76,670,355 46 36,670,355 46 36,670,355 46 5 065 Commercial Paper - Discount 36959JPD9 1288 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 90262DPP4 1289 UBS FINANCE Subtotal antl Average 7,407,557 12 01/04/2007 6,000,000 00 5,965 333 33 01/11/2007 3,000,00000 2,981,18750 9,000,000 00 8,946,520 03 5,965,333 33 5 200 5 230 12 02/13/2007 2 981,187 50 5 250 5 283 22 02/23/2007 8,946,520 83 5 249 15 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 373310K55 1199 313310M79 1205 313310N78 1207 313310705 1226 31331TFG1 1231 37331TND9 1244 31331TWH0 1253 31331TWJ6 1254 31331TG62 1263 31331TU25 1272 31331VA63 1284 31331VP75 1287 31339XJJ4 1210 31339X878 1211 31339XLB8 1272 31339XPL2 1213 31339YHG0 1218 3133X1 P27 1237 3133%30X8 1247 3133X4XF3 1256 3133XSWA2 1264 3133XAR25 1277 3133XAMW4 1279 3133XFK54 1282 3133%F002 1285 3128X1808 1198 3128XiDK0 1204 Run Date 02113/200] -1 ] O6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/19/2003 2500,00000 2435,15625 2496,87500 3120 3104 473 05/19/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/03/2003 2 000,000 00 1 948 750 00 2 000,000 00 3 210 3 166 488 06/03/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 550000000 5482,81250 5500,00000 2440 2407 36 03/09/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/13/2003 3,000 000 00 2 965 312 50 2,995 312 50 3 050 3 049 193 08/13/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 2 000 000 00 1 975,625 00 1 996 562 50 3 375 3 374 235 09/24/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/2003 2,000 000 00 1,967 500 00 2,000 000 00 3 970 3 916 502 06/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/77/2004 2000,00000 1,956,25000 2000,00000 3240 3196 410 03/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/17/2004 4 000 000 00 3 891,250 00 3 997 500 00 3 550 3 517 655 11/17/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 04/29/2004 3 500 000 00 3 428 906 25 3 479 000 00 3 920 4 012 634 10/27/2008 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/10/2004 3 000 000 00 2 968 125 00 3 000 000 00 4 000 3 945 312 12/10/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/13/2006 1,000 000 00 999 375 00 998 580 00 5 150 5 228 120 06/01/2007 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/08/2006 5 000 000 00 5 000 000 00 4,998 750 00 5 600 5 536 554 08/08/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/12/2003 5 000,000 00 4 953,125 00 5 000 000 00 2 650 2 614 130 06/11/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/16/2003 3 000,000 00 2 988 750 00 3,000 000 00 2 430 2 397 43 03/16/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 2 000 000 00 1 980 000 00 2,000 000 00 2 625 2 589 138 06/19/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06126/2003 2,00000000 1,963,75000 2,000,00000 2450 2417 237 09/26/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/16/2003 3 000,000 00 2,983,125 00 3 000,000 00 2 540 2 506 74 04/16/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 3 000,000 00 2 942,812 50 3 000 000 00 4 000 3945 634 10/27/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01 /29/2004 2 000 000 00 1 972 500 00 2 000 000 00 3 355 3 310 270 10/29/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/29/2004 2,00000000 1968,12500 200000000 3500 3453 330 12/28/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/30/2004 2,000 000 00 1 960 625 00 2 000 000 00 3 210 3 167 383 01/30/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/16/2005 1,000,000 00 984 062 50 1 000 000 00 4 080 4 024 584 08/18/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/22/2005 1,000,000 00 987,187 50 999,75000 41100 3 954 386 02/22/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/26/2006 1 515 000 00 1,514,526 56 1 515,000 00 5 250 5 250 25 02/26/2007 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/15/2006 2,000 OOD 00 2 000,625 00 1,998,200 00 5 550 5 507 865 06/15/2009 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/19/2003 5 000,000 00 4,881 320 19 4 993 750 00 3 500 3 479 473 05/19/2008 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/28/2003 4,000 000 00 3 930 007 94 4,000 000 00 3 100 3 058 300 11/28/2007 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6 41 202b "17 Report Ver 500 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments January 31, 2007 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Malunty CUSIP Investmenlq Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rale Moody's 360 Maturity Dale Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 3128X1JD0 1208 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 06/12/2003 5,000,000 00 4 858 370 21 4,998 500 00 3 030 3128X1JN8 1209 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 06/12/2003 2 000 000 00 1,979 324 04 2,000,000 00 2 400 3128X2P25 1257 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 03/30/2004 3 000 000 00 2,930,016 17 3,000,000 00 4 000 3128X07G6 1258 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/12/2004 1,250,000 00 1 226 057 43 1 248,750 00 3 650 3128X25Y7 1260 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/19/2004 2,000,000 00 1 966 937 87 1,997 600 00 2 920 3128X3BF9 1261 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/26/2004 1,000,000 00 985 601 96 1,000 000 00 3 280 3128X3C50 1262 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 04/29/2004 5 000,000 00 4 933 354 95 5,000 000 00 3 450 3128X3FC2 1267 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP 05/24/2004 3 000,000 00 2 963,627 93 2,999 062 50 3 750 3136F3V06 1202 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/27/2003 7 000,000 00 6 936 562 50 6 996 500 00 2 500 3136F3D82 1219 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/16/2003 4 000 000 00 3,950,000 00 4,000 000 00 2 500 3136F32F2 1222 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/29/2003 4,000,000 00 3 890 000 00 3 993 750 00 3 300 3136F5EE7 1250 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/05/2004 3 000 000 00 2,926,875 00 2,999,062 50 3 750 3136FSGP0 1252 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/16/2004 4 000 000 00 3,911,250 00 4 000,000 00 4 040 3136FSP81 1259 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/12/2004 1 000 000 00 984 687 50 1,000 000 00 3 020 3136F6Y06 1278 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/22/2005 2 000 000 00 1,974,375 OD 1,998 600 00 4 000 31359MP31 1283 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/07/2006 3 000 000 00 3,002 812 50 3,000,000 00 5 800 Subtotal and Average 124,201,105 00 124,265,000 00 122,449,457 75 124,201,105 00 2 995 496 06/11/2008 2 367 130 06/11/2007 3 945 788 03130/2009 3 626 461 05/07/2008 2 916 260 10/19/2007 3 235 267 10/26/2007 3 403 270 10/29/2007 3708 295 11/23/2007 2 479 113 05/25/2007 2466 165 07/16/2007 3 289 544 07/29/2008 3 707 876 12/08/2008 3 985 774 03/16/2009 2 979 253 10/12/2007 3 970 386 02/22/2008 5 721 1,587 06/07/2011 3 421 394 Treasury Securities -Coupon 912828CG3 1271 TREASURY NOTE 06/09/2004 5,000 000 00 4,971,875 00 4 985,546 88 3 125 3 184 103 05/15/2007 Suhtolal antl Average 4,985,546 88 5,000,000 00 4,971,875 00 4,985,546 88 3 184 103 Investment Agreements SYS1275 1275 AEGON /TRANSAMERICA 10/21/2004 15,600,00000 1560000000 15,60000000 3682 3682 993 10/21/2009 Subtotal and Average 15,600,000 00 15,600,000 00 15,600,000 00 15,600,000 00 3 682 993 Total and Average 190,623,784 76 190,535,355 46 188,638,209 04 190,403,528 17 J 843 342 Run Date 02/13/200] 1708 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF PM2) SymRepl641 202b ~ co City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Cash January 31, 2007 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Inves[ment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Ra[e Moody's 360 Maturity Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 684,512 79 684,512 79 684,512 79 0 500 0 493 1 Average Balance 000 1 Total Cash and Investmen[ss 190,623,784 76 191,219,868 25 189,322,721 83 191,086,040 96 3 843 342 Run Date 02/13/2007 -17 OB Portfolio CITY CP ~ PM (PRF_PM2) SymRep1641 202 "'~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Activity By Type January 1, 2007 through January 31, 2007 Beginning Statetl Transachon Purchases RedempUOns Entling CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 5 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5156 1,375,36011 3,000,00000 Subtotal 78,294,995 35 1,375,360 11 3,000,000 00 36,670,355 46 SavingslMiscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0 500 285,170 20 0 00 Subtotal 399,742 59 285,170 20 0 00 654,512 79 Commercial Paper -Discount 36959JPD9 1288 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL 5200 01/04/2007 596533333 000 90262DPP4 1289 UBS FINANCE 5 250 01/11/2007 2 981 187 50 0 00 Subtotal 0 00 8,946,520 83 0 00 8,946,520 BJ Federal Agency Issues -Coupon Subtotal 124,201,105 00 124,201,105 00 Treasury Securities -Coupon Subtotal 4,985,546 88 4,965,546 88 Investment Agreements Subtotal 15,600,000 00 15,600,000 00 Total 163,480,969 82 10,607,051 14 3,000,000 00 191,088,040 96 Portfolio CITY CFA Run Dale 02113/2007 - 17 O6 PM (PRF PM3) SymRepi 641 2021 ~ Report Ver 500 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Frscal Agents For the Month Ended December 31, 2006 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Paving Anent Account Name Investment Date Date Yreld Value Assessment District No 93-1 Wells Fargo Imprvmnt Fund Money Market Fund 8/411997 N/A` 4 50 % $ 274 660 67 Masr Plaza Reserve Fund Money Marke[ Fund 8/4/1997 N/A 4 50 % 247,127 75 Redemp Fund Money Market Fund 8/4/1997 N/A' 4 63 % 43 40 $ 521,83182 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series Wells Fargo Expense Fund Fust American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' 0 00% $ - 1999 A (SQ & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv Fund First Amencan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A' 4 50 % 589,322 48 Sr Resrv Fund Fnsf American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A` 450% 1,10711369 Redemption Fund Fust Amencan Treasury Obhgalion 7/1/1999 N/A` 4 45 % 293 25 Revenue Fund Fust American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A' 7 55 % 13 29 Residual Fund Fust American Treasury Obligation 1 /1 612 0 01 N/A' 4 50 % 367,088 76 $ 2,063,831 47 CFD No 2000-03 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Specal Tax Fund Money Market Fund 1 0/1 312 00 5 N/A 4 50°/ $ 194,069 20 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 4 50 % 679,400 51 Escrow Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 NIA 0 00% - Protect Fund Money Markel Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 4 50 % 8,227,448 34 Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 4 50 % 136 128 89 Interest Account Money Market Fund 10/13/2005 N/A 4 50 % 259,733 21 $ 9,496,78015 CFD No 2000-01 South Etiwanda Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Funtl 12/12/2000 N/A 0 00% $ 9 22 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 1 2 /1 212 0 00 N/A 4 50 % 113,537 20 Adman Expense Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 5 05 % 59 63 Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4 89% 86,11310 Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 0 00°/ 4 69 Princpal Account Money Market Funtl 8/31/2006 N/A 0 00 % 4 43 $ 199,728 27 CFD No 2000-02 RC Corporate Park Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A - $ - Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 4 50 % 696,217 40 Adman Expense Funtl Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 N/A 5 05 % 59 63 Acquisition Fund Money Market Fund 12/12/2000 NIA 4 89 % 544,462 67 Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 4 04 % 24 83 Principal Account Money Market Fund 8/3112006 N/A 6 92% 14 52 $ 1 240,779 05 CFD No 2003-01 Improvement Areas #1 Wells Fargo Speaal Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 NIA 4 51 % $ 4,543 72 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8l1 /2003 N/A 4 50% 1,492,328 40 Developer Protect Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4 50 % 643,070 31 Agency Protect Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4 50% 537,984 80 Cultural Center Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4 50 % 551,844 93 Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4 30% 763 33 $ 3,229 935 49 r VmancelCash wRh Frscal Agents xls 2/13/2007 3 52 PM ~ O N City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended December 31, 2006 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Bond Issue Paving Anent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield CFD No 2003-01 Improvement Areas #2 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 0 00 Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 4 50 % Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 5 76 Agency Protect Fund Money Markel Fund 8/1/2003 N/A 0 00 % CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #1 & #2 Wells Fargo Specal Tax Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4 48 Reserve Fund Money Market Funtl 9/18/2001 N/A 4 50 Developer Protect Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 1/4/1900 4 50 % Agency Protect Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 NIA 4 51 Interest Account Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 3 75 Adman Exp Fund Money Markel Fund 9/18/2001 NIA 4 50% Pnnapal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 331% CFD No 2001-01 Improvement Areas #3 Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 0 00% Reserve Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4 50 Developer Protect Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4 50 Admen Exp Fund Money Market Fund 9/18/2001 N/A 4 50 Interest Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 0 00% Pnnapal Account Money Market Fund 8/31/2006 N/A 0 00% CFD No 2004-Ot Rancho Ebwanda Estates Wells Fargo Special Tax Fund Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A 0 00 Reserve Fund Money Market Funtl 7/13/2006 NIA 4 85 Escrow Fund Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 NIA 4 85% Protect Fund Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 N/A 4 85% Cost of Issuance Fund Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 NlA 4 85 Interest Account Money Market Fund 7/13/2006 NIA 4 85°/ Cap Interest Fund Money Market Fund 7 /1 312 0 0 6 N/A 4 85°h TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS 'Note These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand r NnancelCash with Fscal Agenfs xls Cost Value 290,925 06 34 88 018 $ zsoss9lz $ 89 56 1,102,943 55 4,814 72 3,692 62 53 56 105,146 64 30 31 $ 1,216,77096 $ 6 54 80,730 43 8,650 46 21,029 33 4 02 1 91 $ 110,422 69 3,005,267 31 43,605 12 6,644 905 30 120,699 21 1 514 43 840,711 68 $ 10,656,703 OS $ 29,027,743 07 E 29,027,743 07 2/13/2007 3 52 PM ~ O W P104 c ~~-~ T H E C I T Y O F Rnscao Cucnrio~cn Staff Report DATE February 21, 2007 TO Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT AMENDMENT TO THE CDBG BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 - An authorization to appropriate $101,145 08 to Account No 1204314-5650-1230-204 for the Home Improvement Program RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize an amendment to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Home Improvement Program budget for fiscal year 2006-2007 in the amount of $101,145 08 (Account number 1204314-5650-1230-204) ANALYSIS The CDBG budget for the 2006-2007 fiscal year provides $350,000 to the City's Home Improvement Program, however, the budget did not identify any carryover funds from fiscal year 2005-2006 During the budget process forthe current fiscal year, the estimated actual expenditures for this program incorrectly identified that all budgeted funds for the program would be spent The amount identified is the balance in the Home Improvement Program at the end of the 2005-2006 fiscal year The requested action is not an appropriation of new funds, but a re-appropriation of prior year funding to this on-going CDBG funded activity Respectfully submitted, James R Troyer Planning Director JRT TG\ma P105 STAFF REPORT- ENGINEERING DEPARTbIENT RANCHO Date February 21, 2007 cUCAMONGA To Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From William J O'Ned, City Engineer ,,1 ~, / By Cindy Hackett, Associate Enginee( y~ Subject. REJECT ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE FY 2006/2007 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -CAPE SEAL OF VARIOUS STREETS AS NON-RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY AND APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE FY 2006/2007 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS TO BE FUNDED FROM PROPOSITION 42 TRAFFIC RELIEF FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO 119030356 50/ 1022190-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Councl reject all bids received for the 2006/2007 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Cape Seal of Various Streets as non-responsive to the needs of the City and approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice of Inviting Bids" for the FY2006/2007 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets to be funded from Proposition 42 Traffic Relief funds, Account No 11903035650/1022190-0 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 23, 2007, for the subject project The Engineer's estimate was $1,222,131 94 After further evaluation, staff has determined that the product is non-responsive to the needs of the City Staff has evaluated the overall project, and determined that an asphalt overlay would better suit the needs of the streets within the project area Staff therefore recommends that the FY2006/2007 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets be advertised for bid The project specifications Engineer The Engineer's 2007 and March 6, 2007, addendum Res ectfully subJmnittped~ ~v (~il~C. Wil iam J O'Neil City Engineer WJO CH Is for the overlay were completed by staff and approved by the City Estimate is $1,640,000 Legal advertising is scheduled for February 27, with bid opening at 2 00 p m on March 13, 2007 unless extended by Attachments o's r; . ' .1 ~ ~ i~~ ^ MAP-" 3" UPLAND MAP-" 4 "- MAP-" 5"t MAP-"8" J MAP-" 6" MAP-" 7" LEGEND• STREET FOR REHAB. (0.10' AC OVERLAID •~~~~~~r I ~ NM1 STREET ~:~- BOUNDARY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 2006/07 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OVERLAY PROJECTS VICINITY MAP -MAP-„ > „ BOUNDARY LlN6 III 1 ~ I ~,~u ST ~~ L~ ATLSIR ~N~~' x.'r.s. P107 RESOLUTION NO D7~' Q /~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY 2006/2007 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga W HEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for FY 2006/2007 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offces of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2 00 p m on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, sealed bids or proposals for the " FY 2006/2007 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation -Overlay of Various Streets" in said City Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of FY 2006/2007 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS PREVAILING WAGE Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is requred to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the tob site P108 RESOLUTION NO February 21, 2007 Page 2 Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50 00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777 5 and 1777 6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him Section 1777 5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the toint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade fora cert~fcate of approval The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices totourneymen that will be used in the performance of the contract The ratio of apprentices totourneymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except A When unemployment in the area of coverage by thetoint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C When the trade can show that it is replaang at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight tourneymen The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices ortourneymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777 5 and 1777 6 in the employment of apprentices Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator ofApprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended P109 RESOLUTION NO February 21, 2007 Page 3 The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25 00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permuted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773 8 The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, inform and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract, Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et seq) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028 15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of penury, that the information being provided is true and correct The work is to be done in accordance with the specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35 00 (THIRTY-FIVE P110 RESOLUTION NO February 21, 2007 Page 4 DOLLARS), said $35 00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable Upon written request bythe bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15 00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead The successful bidder will be regwred to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3 2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention) The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "FY 2006/2007 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION -OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS" may be directed to Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer at (909) 477-2740, extension 4066 By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Dated this 2151 day of February, 2007 Publish Dates February 27, 2007 and March 6, 2007 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 21 st day of February, 2007 Donald J Kurth, M D ,Mayor ATTEST Debra J Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Counal held on the 21 ~' day of February, 2007 P111 RESOLUTION NO February 21, 2007 Page 5 Executed this 215` day of February, 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON February 27, 2007 and March 6, 2007 P112 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: February 21, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From• William J O'Neil, City Engineer By: Shelley Hayes, Engineering Technician RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Subject. APPROVAL TO SUMMARILY VACATE AND QUITCLAIM EXCESS PORTION OF LA GRANDE STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CAMEO STREET REQUESTED BY BRIAN AND DAWN MURPHY AND BRUCE ALVAREZ RELATEC FILE VACATION 205 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve to summarily vacate and gwtclaim excess portion of La Grande Street at the southwest corner of Cameo Street, the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the resolutions, the City Engineer is hereby authorized to sign the Owtclaim Deeds, and that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of these resolutions to be filed for record in the office of the county Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On December 3, 1962, Tract 6518 dedicated La Grande Street as a stub street for a future connection to City of Upland On March 28, 1989, Tract 13266 in the City of Upland was recorded and eliminated the need of La Grande Street connection The Developer of Tract 13266 was conditioned to remove the public improvements on the stub street and restore it to the natural state with erosion and dust control material The two adjacent homeowners, Brian/Dawn Murphy and Bruce Alvarez have requested the vacation of the excess right-of-way with the intent to merge this area into their existing lots The Public Utility Companies and City Divisions have been notified of the proposed vacation and had no objections to the vacation However, a City storm drain runs through the property and a drainage easement will be reserved If the excess right-of-way is vacated, half the width (30 feet) will revert to the two adjoining lots The proposed vacation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the circulation element of the general plan On October 25, 2006, the Planning Commission made the finding through minute action that the proposed vacation conforms to the City's General Plan This finding is now forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval Respectfully Submitted,, ~..~~C~C~~%C~ Wilk m J O'Neil Cdy Engineer WJO SH dlw Attachments P113 EXHIBIT "A" Vicinity Map \ - `~ ^ ~^ N W E S m P114 RESOLUTION NO d 7' ~-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE SUMMARILY VACATION OF EXCESS STREET EASEMENT Of LA GRANDE STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CAMEO STREET, V- 205 -APN 202-284-01 AND 202-285-07 WHEREAS, THE City Council found by all the evidence submitted that the excess street easement perthe description in attached ExhibitA is unnecessary for present or prospective public purposes NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows SECTION 1 That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating the excess street easement as described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B"and by reference made a part thereof SECTION 2 That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess street easement no longer constitutes a public easement SECTION 3 That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservation and exceptions for existing utilities on record, including but not limited to City of Rancho Cucamonga drainage easement SECTION 4 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force SECTION 5 That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California P115 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LA GRANDE STREET LYING NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE, AND SOUTHERLY OF LOT 93 OF TRACT NO 6518 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 85 OF MAPS, PAGES 26 THROUGH 28, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID LA GRANDE STREET AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "A" AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT MAP, THENCE NORTH 69°46'47" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, 4811 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 419 00 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE AND CURVE, 1930 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°38'21" TO THE BEGINNING OF ANON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 70 00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 41 °24'36" WEST, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, 35 O6 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°41'52" TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 93 AND A POINT OF CUSP WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20 00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT OF CUSP BEARS SOUTH 53°10'21" EAST, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 93, 11 50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°57'08", THENCE SOUTH 69°46'47" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 61 96 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", THENCE SOUTH 44°59'37" EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 33 04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING RESERVING THEREFROM ANON-EXCLUSIVE BLANKET EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0 047 ACRES (2,079 SO FT) PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING 4`~ UNDER THE DIRECTION OF ~ a eazo ~ * eXp a-~o-os MARK WARE, P L S 5820 DATE ~~ ~~~% LIC EXP 06-30-08 LA GRANDE NORTH ~' APPROX AREA 0 047 ACRES (2, 079 SQ Fr) 5620 Exp 6-10-pg ~ EXHIBIT "Bn SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION CURVE DATA D=80'10"41 "" AO R=70 00' L= 97 96' D=28'41'52"" OB R=70 00' L=35 06' D=51'28"49"" OC R=70 00" L=62 9d D=02 38'21" S'T~~`?~/ ~ \ ~ cG\ \ OD R=419 00' ~9)FpF~1F0 'Z.aS~a7 ~ \~ \ ~\ \~ L=1930' D=92'38'27" \\ \\ 3 \ \~ O ~=32 34' (, !, \ \30 1a 12 \ D=32'57'08" 1 \ \ OF R=20 00' '~ ~ ~ $ L=11 so' 00 0g , ~ \ 12 ~ ~ \ \ D=59'41'19"" ~'o\N 560 ~a~D ~ ~ ''\ `%- N ~Q \\ \\ W, \ ~ \ O~ ~~ 13 96' S I ~ ~~ \ \ _ A ,oos.~yo? (G~ ~ ~ mm ~ ~ - - - \\ NT OT UR\~/ \~ \ -- \ 9~~ 9 d6 d61•W F SA B\\ Ea %~j~l D_20.2 L~ 149 0~ 0 6 ~ - ~`~\\._-. 5 636196 w A Ski/ ~ GRANDE °- ~~ `. P.O.B. ~^6 \ ~ _ ~ - - - _ SEE DETAIL t o' ~ J ~\ d~,.~ ~ ''t'yt \ °' 569 y3 06 1 96 oT 2F .qo\ ~\ 6 B xs ~? ~GZ ~ ~ 9,p P.O.B. r~r~~r I~~J, JJ I Cj I~d.B, r3J/2E~~3 0 ~~ W J U _L R~W- ^? _CURB ST. 1. CURB ae d ~ G - yy N ~ N6g y 21. ~ \ L_g5 08' J R W ~ ` d da 11 D p9, R 389 00 ~ ~ ~ 4'Og `~ ~ ~~ °- D ~ ~ 68p9~p0° // ` ~ __ TArr. ~~ `. 3~2i ~ D%10 / o ~9 ~~ ~\/ i 35 30 p0"`t/ _N10'04'13'"W~R~/ o i~ ~ °0 ~~' ~~ 69 d6 POINT OF CUSP ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ _,~5 o c~ Goa ~~ \ u o I ~ os.\~~ J r i o \~ ~ °o o_ d6 11,~ ~ \ I ~ `~ d~..E iREE1 \ ~~ ~~ N6946 dg~RpN~E 5 \ ~ ~P o __ ___6499"__~___ LOT 'A' \J~ ~ ~ i ,E N89'46'00"W 1478 OS' -- (1' WIDE STRIP) ~~; o\\Q. /3/353140 ~ a0~0~98 TRACT BOUNDARY DETAIL ~ s\~~,o6g4J f~ NTS \ NOTE DIMENSIONS AND AREAS SHOWN ARE COMPILED FROM RECORD AND CALCULATED DATA /-~- '~ P117 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LA GRANDE STREET LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE, AND NORTHERLY OF LOT 94 OF TRACT NO 6518 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 85 OF MAPS, PAGES 26 THROUGH 28, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID LA GRANDE STREET AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "A" AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT MAP, THENCE NORTH 69°46'47" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, 48 11 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 419 00 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE AND CURVE, 1930 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°38'21" TO THE BEGINNING OF ANON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 70 00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 41 °24'36" WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, 62 90 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51°28'49" TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 94 AND A POINT OF CUSP WITH A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 389 00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT OF CUSP BEARS NORTH 10°04'13" WEST, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 94, 68 91 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°09'00", THENCE SOUTH 69°46'47" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 34 26 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT ':4", THENCE NORTH 44°59'37" WEST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 33 04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING RESERVING THEREFROM ANON-EXCLUSIVE BLANKET EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0 051 ACRES (2,244 SO FT) PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF MARK WARE, P L S 5820 LIC EXP 06-30-OS LA GRANDE SOUTH 5820 Exp 6-30-08 2-08-0-0~ ~. DATE ~~OF APPROX AREA 0 051 ACRES (2,244 SO FT) 5820 ~ * Exp 6-30-08 ~, EXHIBIT n8" SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION r~'Arr ~~lJ. ~~ l 11/I.~. L3J~~FJ-'~S CURVE DATA D=80'10'41 " AO R=70 00' L=97 96' D=28'41'52" O R=70 00' L=35 06' D=51'28'49" O R=70 00' L=62 90' 9~~ 1Y0~\P 2-opj-o~ A\ \~c~ \ ~~~\ \\~ O~=93001„ ~\ \~ ~ \ ~ D=92'38"27" \ \ 3D \~ O ~=3~ 34' ~. \ \30 ~8 12 \ D=32'57'08" J ~ 18 \ \ OF R=20 00' L=11 50' \ ~D119 ~ ~ \ 12 x ~ \ \ D=59'41'19" \\ 2 ~ i \\ \~ L=20 84' oN~ 56~ ~8i ~'\\~. N mQ \\ \\ l / ^~ \ o, om / 13 96, J J SS ~ I ~ ~ \\ \ \ A A 3. G ~ \m~ ~_-- < o,,~,T oa,~ 1 \ \ O,c~ Gip / \ \ ~ - - \ \ o _ E -~~ \\ E 6~/~,/ 3'13' R=419 00' ' s\~ ~ ' \ B \ k~/ D-20 2 L-149 0~ - ~>~\ ; ;~._~X , 56 D6 ~~~~W o O~\ ~k%/ GRANDE 1 J r ~ r1 SEE DETAIL J 0 v J U _L R~W- ^? -CURB m ST. •1 --- .., CURB N R/W 1 0'~ ~ ~ 48 ~, U '09' R; Sam I rAA ~\ 3426 D'1D / o I._ ~9 s~ ~ 35.3 4T `N _N70'04'13"W~RL o ~ ~ ~ ~TBO jy _,~Sg9 46 POINT OF CUSP o N ~ ~ ~-p9\ \ ° 569 g 06 96 -~ os.\~ o I o ~o~s9'~• ~ 1 ° P.O.B. 49 21 ~ .~ \ I 2o9'f's-~i~ \ \~"' y9' 46 4~ as 11 pNDE 5~~~ \ \ ~ \~ N ~~PGR o __ ___6499" _~-__ L07 'A~ ~~ '~ .~E N8946"00"W 147805' y (1' WIDE STRIP) \ oQ, p 26 '~ ~ O9 TRACT BOUNDARY ~'~~ ~~O\ 3 3 4604'„W N00'02 g8 DETAIL ~~.\\',569 J f~ NTS ~ \~ NOTE DIMENSIONS AND AREAS SHOWN ARE COMPILED FROM RECORD AND CALCULATED DATA P119 RESOLUTION NO U 7 D y7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT SAID LOT A MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE UNNECESSARY AND RESTRICTIVE, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE THOSE CERTAIN QUITCLAIM DEEDS, COPIES OF WHICH ARE ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A", AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE RECORDED WHEREAS, the excess street easement of La Grande Street at Cameo Street Tract No 6518, applicable to Lots 93 and 94 of said tract, was determined to be unnecessary and restrictive in nature, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the findings on October 25, 2006, that authorizing the vacation of vehicular access nghts would be in conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows SECTION 1 That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby quitclaims said Lot A excess street easement applicable to Lots 93 and 94 of Tract No 6518, on fde in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, Marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part thereof SECTION 2 That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said street easement no longer constitutes a public easement SECTION 3 That the subject quitclaim shall be subject to the reservation and exceptions for existing utilities of record, including but not limited to City of Rancho Cucamonga drainage easement SECTION 4 That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California SECTION 5 That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force SECTION 6 The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute the quitclaim deeds, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto, and cause the same to be recorded forthwith upon adoption of this Resolution P120 Assessor Parcel No ~G~1 -J-~~-C I RECORDING REQUESTED BY Crty of Rancho Cucamonga WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE O MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX ffi COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED Name OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND Street ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING AT TIME OF SALE Address CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Clry & State Signature of Declarant or Agent tletermining tax Firm Name CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The Crty ofRancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation under the laws ofthe State of California, hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to Brian D. Murphy and Dawn B. Murphy, husband and wife as ,7oTnt tenants that certain real property m the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described and shown on the attached Exhibits "A" and "B" STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On )SS before me, Wrlliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer a Notary Public m and for said Counry and State personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same m his/her/then authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/them signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature FOR NOTARY SEAL OR S CAMP -I P121 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT ';4"LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF LA GRANDE STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO 6518 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS RECORDED IN BOOK 85 OF MAPS, PAGES 26 THROUGH 28, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESERVING THEREFROM ANON-EXCLUSIVE BLANKET EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR STORM GRAIN PURPOSES CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY (33 SQ FT ) PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF V '~ E ^~ MARK WARE, P L S 5820 LIC EXP 06-30-08 LOT "A' SOUTH 2 -oB-o-J DATE ~ ~ 5820 a y Exp 6-3D-08 ~~ APPROX AREA 33 SQ FT 5820 Exp 6-30-OB EXHIBIT "B" SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 7l1'r1 CT ~~l ~. D ~l M.~. X5/26-~8 CURVE DATA D=80'70'41 " AO R= 70 00' L=97 96' D=28'41 X52' OB R=70 00' L=35 06' D=51'28'49" OC R=70 00' L=62 90' D= 02 38'21 " ~~~~CAU~pP~\ 2 -off -0"7 ~ \\~~ \\ °~~\ \\ ~ O ~=~9 30 ° D=92'38'27" \\ \\ ~ \ ~ O ~=3~ 34' ~. ,, \ \3p' 1a 12 \ D=32'57'08" J ~ ~g \ \ OF R=20 00' ~ L=U 50' ~ 107 19 i ~ ~ 12 x ~ \ \ D=59'41'19" ~ i \Z \\ \~ \ \ OR=2084' N~N\ S67/8/O/ / ~\ ~ N ~ \\ \\ a"'t°~~ i ~ / "~\\° ` `rte O \ \ 1 1 cW°'~ ~ ~ ~ \~ 1 o\CS) \ ~ 1 vA 13 96' pS.s3, O ~ I ~ x~m \ \ _ L R~W- ~~-- < \ OiyTOF7FR ~ \~ ~\ ^? -CURB ~~_--w \\ 6s F cGS'O / \ E „~l~l/ , R=419 00' o °D. \ oo. 5 _ ?~" \ \ ryk~% / D-20~2 ~~ 149 0. - - - 4 w o0 9~'~ y-- x , 56 ~ 6 ' w o_ O~ \ ~~~' GRANDE ~ ST. \~ _ ~ _ - //-- I~~ \~`y 5 41~~E ~ \ ~ \ \ ~ - - ~ _ - - N CURB LOT n/1 n ~ ~! ~~ N6 4g 2~ ~ ~C L.96 ~8~ -Ii R~W `~ ~ ` ~1~ D 9. 8=389 00 I SEE DETAIL 10 ` ~` o ~4'p90~ / `~ \`~ W ~ ~L'6 p9~00~ / ~ ~RU. ~~ 4fi 4i~ D~10 / o ~__ ~~9 `SO- 569 5 37~ _N70'04'13"W~RL/ o i~ ~ ~ cT ~~' `~ 3 POINT OF CUSP ~ ~ ~ ~ _ B ~ _- J ~ OG20~i't\ oN ~ 3 ~ r r~ ~~\ \ 0 569 46 6" / ~ ~'~ oos \~~ J -r °o 9~'T'LA9~\ 6, X61 96 0- \o~. °o ~p sy~.2~~ 1 0' 2~, j t \ I 'n G~~Pi~/ \\ \~ N69~ aB~R E ~~~ \\\ I ~- ~P ~.+ __ ___6499 __~___ $1Y POR. ~ ~ ° '~i ,.E N89'46'00"W 1478 OS' ~- (1"LOIDE SATRIP) `'~8 Job r x'353747 W~ N00029 TRACT BOUNDARY ~, os 569 46 DETAIL ~~\~,o, J f~ N TS \ NOTE DIMENSIONS AND AREAS SHOWN ARE COMPILED FROM RECORD AND CALCULATED DATA ~ -3 P123 Assessor Parcel No ,3G~-~5>-a ) RECORDING REQUESTED BY Crty of Rancho Cucamonga WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ ., COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED Name _ OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND Street _ ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING AT TIME OF SALE Address CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cry s State Signature of DeGarant or Agent determining tax Frm Name CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, a Mtuucipal Corporation under the laws of the State of Cahforma, hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to Bruce Alvarez, an unmarried man that certain real property m the Crty ofRancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Cahforma, described and shown on the attached Exhibits "A" and "B" STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF __ On }SS before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to [he within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same m tits/her/their authorized capaci[y(ies), and that by tits/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the pei son(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument WI FNESS my hand and official seal Signature William J. O'Neil, City Engineer FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP r I P124 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT `;4"LYING NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF LA GRANDE STREET AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO 6518 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS RECORDED IN BOOK 85 OF MAPS, PAGES 26 THROUGH 28, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESERVING THEREFROM ANON-EXCLUSIVE BLANKET EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY (33 SO FT) PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF O a 5820 ,* Exp o-30-08 ~~ ~ ~-- oa -~~ ~~~OF CAS ~Y~ MARK WARE, P L S 5820 DATE - LIC EXP 06-30-08 LOT ",4" NORTH 'J 125 APPROX AREA 33 SQ FT 5670 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exp ~-30-06 EXHIBIT "Bn r~'~1 rr ~~1~. ~~ l 3 CURVE DATA D=80'10'41 " AO R=70 00' L=97 96' D=28'41'52" OB R=70 00' L=35 06' D=51'28'49" OC R=70 00' L=62 90' D-02'38'21'" \P \ \ \ n\ \ Op R=419 00' L 1930' 2-ng--a7 ~ \~ ~ A~\ \~ = " ' ' OA~\~ \ \ \ 30,\ O 27 D=92 38 R 32 Oq' \ \ \~ 12 _ (, J ~ \ \3p' \g 18 \ \ \ OF D=32'57'08'" R=20 00' ' 9 99 i ~ ~ 12 ~ ~ \ \ L=11 50 D=59'41'19" ~ j 0 Ci i \ N \ \~ \ \ O R=20 84' \~, \\ Sys ~$~ ~ ~\ ~' ~~\ga J :~ \~ I 3 96' SS3 OF CU A /~~ \ spy, F 9~ \ 63 p6 q1' W ,~~ \\ ~ B ~~~„X~569gB o U \ I ~ `~ ,q~"E LOT n n n SEE DETA~`I'L1 ~~`\\ 9~'T tip 9 21 / .1 Q\ N69% ,481 A E SEE \ \ \ ~ ~`_~ ~P G w _64 99' _ _~ o_ \ ~,~ ~i E - - - N89'46'00"W 1478 OS' 2s\~\\~, /3/353,4 ~-~ N0o0~08 TRACT BOUNDARY DETAIL ~ o\~~,o694J ~~ Nrs \ J :~ 0 u w J U ti \ \ N~'mpA \ \\ ~ f ~ ~ _ L R~- ^? CURB \ \ - - - \ ~ ~ o 1 ~ E 6~/~/ 13~~ R°419 00' ~%~/ 0-20'2~_149AN E ST. k - ~ GRl~ ~ W _ _ _ 0 ~ ~~~__~ -- ~ CURB N \ .\\ Ng 94 21'\, \ ~ \C 0o L_gg OS' R/W ~'S \\\ ~~\ 69 A6 4~ ~~/ 0~ 10 O9 0 / m ~ ro / o 9~, ~ `'S~i 353 _N70'04'13"<~RL oo i. ~ ~ T ~° ~ `i POINT OF CUSP ~ ~ ~y v n oG'l'0 ~~~\\ ON 3 (- r o. N'LY POR. - LOT "A" 1' WIDE STRIP) 569a3o 'VJ 6 ~ ~~~s °'os\~o / r~ i o°o J 6, 61 9 wo \ `~. ~ o0 c, ,- 1 0' ~ -~ \ cn NOTE DIMENSIONS AND AREAS SHOWN ARE COMPILED FROM RECORD AND CALCULATED DATA P126 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: February 21, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle Community Services Director By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL INC., RELATING TO ANNUAL CITY SPONSORED JULY 4T" FIREWORKS SHOW AT THE EPICENTER STADIUM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Amendment No 6 to the Lease Agreement between the City and Valley Baseball, Inc (Quakes) relating to an annual City sponsored July 4`h fireworks show at the Epicenter Stadium BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS For a number of years, Chaffey College hosted an evening fireworks show on Independence Day and the City provided acommunity-wide 4`h of July Arts and Crafts Fair during the day at Red Hill Community Park In 1999, the College decided to cancel their event and City took over providing a fireworks show for the community at the College on the 4'h of July in 2004, due to a construction protect at the College, a change of venue for the event was necessary and the City's 4`" of July fireworks show moved to the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Between 2004 and 2006 a verbal understanding has existed between the Quakes and the City to allow the City to host our annual 4"' of July event at the Epicenter Stadium Moving the City's annual 4`" of July event to the Epicenter has proven to be positive for the community, the City and the Quakes Access to and egress from the event has greatly improved as a result of this move and the event has been able to be expanded to include a larger fun zone for the children Both the City and the Quakes have indicated a desire to amend the lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball, Inc and to formally provide for an annual City sponsored July 4`h event at the Stadium Therefore, it is staffs recommendation that the City Council approve the attached Amendment No 6 to the Amended and Restated Lease between the City and Valley Baseball Inc Respec Ily su m tt Kevm Mc rdle Community Services Director I ICOMMSERNCounciBBoartlslQryCounc~IStaHReports12007L4mendment0uakesLease No 6 4thJuly 2 21 07 doc P127 AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("CITY" HEREINAFTER) AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. ("TENANT" HEREINAFTER) A. Recitals. (i) Dunng August, 1999, City and Tenant entered into the above-referenced Amended and Restated Lease which has been amended five rimes pnor to this Amendment No 6 Said Lease as so amended five rimes heremafrer is referred to as "the Lease " (u) The parties wish to again amend the Lease to provide for City sponsored July 4 events at the Stadium B. Amendment No. 6. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows New subparagraphs hereby are added to Section 11 02 of the Lease to read as follows Notwithstanchng anything to the contrary stated rn this Section 11 02, there shall be no practice or baseball game conducted by Tenant at the Stadium on any July 4 dunng the remainder of the term hereof On each such July 4, City shall sponsor a fireworks show at the Stadium and Tenant shall have the nght to provide all concessions for each such fireworks show and Tenant's management may participate m all meetings pertaining to each such event Further, Tenant shall be provided up to 200 tickets to each such July 4 event for Tenant's employees and management and Tenant shall be provided three (3)no charge dates per year for Quakes events such as corporate outings/picnics, celebnty softball games and baseball clinics to occur at the Stadium without charge. Each such Quakes event shall be approved by City's Community Services Director, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld Tenant shall provide all box office services, concessions, video boazd and camera capabilities, parking lot managers and attendants at normal hourly rates, ATM access and, if requested by City, merchandise store access dunng each July 4 event Tenant shall pay to City 15% of Tenant's net revenues received from concessions dunng each July 4 event 2 Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease, and each and every term and provision thereof, shall remain m full force and effect 11231-0001~91S941 v1 doc P128 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered mto this Amendment No 6 as of the dates stated below as to each such party CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated Dated Dated By Mayor Attest City Clerk VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC By: President 11?31-OOOIV1S941v1 doc STAFF REPORT EivGINEERING DEP_~,RTi\fENT Date: February 21, 2007 To• Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J O'Neil, City Engineer By• Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer P129 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO 2 TO SANBAG CONTRACT NO 04-052 BETWEEN THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR WORK RELATING TO ROUTE 210 CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Counal approve and execute Amendment No 2 to SANBAG Contract No 04-052 between the San Bernardino Associated Governments and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for work relating to Route 210 construction BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS During construction of the 210 Freeway, certain additional improvements, peripheral to the freeway, were agreed upon by SANBAG and the City for the benefit and safety of the residents of the City and others transversing the freeway In April 2004, SANBAG and the City executed a Cooperative Agreement addressing responsibilities and funding on a variety of pending items related to construction of State Route 210 On April 5, 2006, SANBAG and the City executed Amendment No 1 to SANBAG Contract No 04-052 whereby additional funding was authorized for 6-foot high garden wall on the north side of Route 210 and the Beryl Park/Soccer Field Screening based on engineering contract estimates The Beryl Park/Soccer Field Screening Project has been constructed and change orders during construction increased the contract bid price by $14,060 00, for a total pro/ect cost of $192,148 00, to be shared equally between the City and SANBAG The work has been accepted by the City and the contractor has been paid in full by the City, including said change orders On January 18, 2007 Amendment No 2 to the original Cooperative Agreement between SANBAG and the City for the Beryl Park/Soccer Field Screening change orders in the amount of $7,030 00 for SANBAG's portion was reviewed and recommended for approval by the SANBAG Ma/or Pro/ects Committee On February 7, 2007, Amendment No 2 was approved by the SANBAG Board of Directors P130 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE AMENDMENT TO SANBAG CONTRACT NO 04-052 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 PAGE 2 Since the SANBAG Board of Directors approved Amendment No 2 which increases SANBAG's cost by $7,030 00 due to change orders, It is recommended the Council approve Amendment No 2 to the original agreement to bring to closure the construction costs for the Beryl Park/Soccer Field Screening Project If Amendment No 2 is approved, the City will invoice SANBAG for one-half of the total cost of $192,148 00 Respectfully submitted, ~~~~"'~ ~~ William J O Neil City Engineer WJO MO I5 Attachments LUC~A I IUN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BERYL PARK SCREEN FENCE VICINITY MAP P132 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: February 21, 2007 To• Mayor and Members of the City Councl Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William J O'Neil, City Engineer By Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subtect: APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA-50) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF "BACKBONE"IMPROVEMENTS TO JACK BENNY DRIVE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO DAY CREEK CHANNEL IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF DRC2003-00732, SUBMITTED BY THE BATES COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for the installation of a traffic signal at 4"' Street and Richmond Place, in conjunction with the development of Parcel Map 16300, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS As a Condition of Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 16300, Tharaldson Development Company, the Developer, was requred to install a traffic signal at 4~h Street and Richmond Place Said traffic signal installation and related improvements have been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga last August 2006 Whenever a developer is required, as a condition of approval of a development permit, to construct a public facility that is determined by the City to have supplemental size, length or capacity over what is needed for the impacts of that development, and when such construction is necessary to ensure effiaent and timely construction of the facilities network, a reimbursement agreement with the developer and a credit against the Transportation Development Fee shall be offered The Developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs of the required signal modification The total cost of said improvements is $ 141,932 00, to be reimbursed from the City Transportation Reimbursement Account Number 11243035650/1026124-0 Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office Res ecffully Submitted, ~~'; ~e ~ W iam J O'Neil City Engineer WJO WV dlw Attachments P133 ., PROJECT SITE 4Tr, a ~~ ~o N CITY OF ITEM: D~pC ~ ~~~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: ENGINEERING DIVISION ' P134 RESOLUTION NO OI- L~ ~ -S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA-50) FOR THE INSTALLATION OF "BACKBONE" IMPROVEMENTS TO JACK BENNY DRIVE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO DAY CREEK CHANNEL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Master Plan Transportation Facility Reimbursement Agreement (SRA-50) submitted by The Bates Company, as developer of DRC2003-00732 for the installation of "backbone" improvements to Jack Benny Drive from Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Channel, and WHEREAS, the Developer, at Developer's expense, has completed the required "backbone' improvements, and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said agreement to record and to cause same to record P135 STAFF REPORT ~NGINEERIi~~G DEPARTMENT Date. February 21, 2007 To• Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From. William J O'Neil, City Engineer By. Walter Stickney, Associate Engineer RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Subtect: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,424,780 55 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY, FOR THE BASE BID AND THE ALL ALTERNATIVES AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $342,478 05 FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION -PHASES II AND III, TO BE FUNDED FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO 1 1 1 03 1 656 50/1 5191 1 0-0, PED GRANT ART 3 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO 12143035650/1519214-0, PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND, ACCOUNT NO 11203055650/1519120-0, GENERAL FUND, ACCOUNT NO 10013075650/1519001-0, BEAUTIFICATION FUND, ACCOUNT NO 11103165650/1520110-0, CAPITAL RESERVES FUND, ACCOUNT NO 10250015650/1520025-0 AND BTA FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO 11923035650/1520192-0 AND APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS OF $100,000 00 TO ACCOUNT NO 1 1 1 0 31 6 565 0/1 51 91 1 0-0 FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUND BALANCE, $1,000,00000 TO ACOUNT NO 11203055650/1519120-0 FROM PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND BALANCE, $1,167,05000 TO 10013075650/1519001-0 FROM GENERAL FUND BALANCE AND $100,000 00 TO ACCOUNT NO 1 1 1 031 6 56 50/1 520 1 1 0-0 FROM BEAUTIFICATION FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that he City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $3,424,780 55 to the apparent low bidder, Sully-Miller Contracting Company, for the Base Bid and all Alternatives and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $342,478 05, for the Paafic Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction - Phases II and III, to be funded from Beautification Fund, Account No 1 1 1 031 65650/1 51 91 1 0-0, Ped Grant Art 3 Fund, Account No 1 21 43035650/1 51 921 4-0, Park Development Fund, Account No 11203055650/1519120-0, General Fund, Account No 1 001 30756 50/1 51 9001-0, Beautification Fund, Account No 1 1 1 031 65650/1 5201 1 0-0, Capital Reserve Fund, Account No 10250015650/1520025-0 and BTA Fund, Account No 11923035650/1520192-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $100,000 00 to Account No 1 1 1 031 656 50/1 5 1 91 1 0-0 from Beautification Fund balance, $1,000,000 00 to Account No 11203055650/1519120-0 from Park Development Fund balance, $1,167,050 00 to 10013075650/1519001-0 from General Fund balance and $100,000 00 to Account No 11103165650/1520110-0 from Beautification Fund balance P136 ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF PncE 2 THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,424,780 55 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY, FOR THE BASE BID AND THE ALL ALTERNATIVES AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY FEBRUARY 21, 2007 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Inland Empire Electric Trail, which will extend thoughout the City, has been broken into a series of phases The different phases are associated with the various funding sources that will construct the trail Design has been completed and funding secured for Phases II (Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue) and Phase III (Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue) Federal funding in the amount of $252,000 00 will be used in contunction with City funding for constructing this protect The appropriation also covers the funds requred for construction survey and soils and materials testing The trail ultimately will consist of a concrete bicycle/pedestrian trail, overhead lighting and signalized crossings at all intersection streets The trail will also have a multiuse decomposed granite trail which will parallel the concrete trail the length of the protect In addition, landscaping will be installed within the trail at the intersecting streets Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 4, 2007, for the subtect protect The Engineer's estimate was $3,621,10915 for the Base Bid and Additive Alternate Bids 2, 3, 4 and 5 Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with and irregularities to be inconsequential Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders meet the requirements of the bid documents The Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction -Phases II and III scope of work consists of installing an eleven (11) foot wide PCC pedestrian/bicycle trail and a twelve (12) foot wide decomposed granite multi-purpose trail including drainage improvements, trail lighting, landscaping, etc along the former Paafic Electric Railroad right-of-way The contract documents call for sixty (60) working days to complete this construction Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ Willi m J O'Neil City Engineer WJO WS Attachments P137 --~ I ~ '--------------- -------- ~-------j ~ ----- - ------------'I us ERO xusloE ao I ~ j fee 'I vnisoxn I wLLSON nv wnsax'v ,\ BnxYn 6T BnN N 81~ en •.\ s ' €S \ ~ ~ ( P IBS 1It0 0 ` ~ VILiORIP BPS LINE RU `_ ~~ ~ Y N' % ~ CHUBCN T cxva t g _ nnv ~ 0 S J r ~ a mxu ~ •wvow ai g` lER9EV Bl ru ~ ~ I x.. ~ \ liN B x Bi - 1\ 6TH 6iX ITN Bi Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail ~ ~ -Phases II & III ,i ¢~ Qj j i I z~ ~~ I ~ ~ I ~~ yl I j wl ~ ¢, >I ~ =i I ~~ al ¢~ w' I ~ ¢I of ___. _T___ -___-__ U ~T__-_-___._.-~____ - --~i ------------ ~ >_ ~ Q = j Vicinity Map Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail - Phases II & III (from Amethyst Ave. to Haven Ave.) PE3E I PHASES 2 AND 3 BI D BU.MMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 4 2007 SD ODam I P ac~c Electnc lnlantl Em ire Tall ConstrucDon fmm Ameth 5[ ENGTNEER'8 ESTIMATE n[Law Br der Sull •Mlller Cont2cbn Co 8ID QTY UNIT DSCiUPTION UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT ITEM # AFTER CORRECTIONS I 1 0.5E 8ID I 1 I Is Mph6vanon 1 s Too DaD Do I s loo DDO Do slob Da0 0o I uoD ooo 00 I 1 loD ooo oD 2 I 1 Is IClearmo b Gmbbi I uD ooo 00 1 s uo ooo 0o s3o ooo 0o I s3o ooo 0o I s 3D ooo 00 3 7D LF I Remove Smne Wall I S B 00 I 560 00 g35 00 42 450 00 1 2 950 00 4 q 30 SF I Remove LAndsm ino & Parke Area 3 00 15 12 390 OD f1 30 54 5q3 00 1 4593 00 5 6 232 LF Remove Reil I S 40 OD S 9 280 OD 46 00 51 392 00 1 S 1 39200 3 EA (Remove Post I f 50 00 I f 150 00 551 00 1 5153 00 1 S 153 W 7 e I 3 l EA I I Remove Existln Tree I 750 DO 1 f 2250 00 $600 W I Sl B00 OD f 180000 2 614 SF I Remove A C Pavement I f 2 00 I f 5228 DO 52 50 I SE 535 00 I S 6535 00 9 1D 1 281 I I SF (Remove P C C Pavement I S it 00 I S 3 09100 f2 80 1 S78fi 80 1 S 766 80 97 LF (Remove P C C Curb antl Gutter 1 f 11 00 S 1 067 00 SID 00 1 $ WO OO I S 970 W ii 12 I 100 I 7D LF I 5F I Remove P C C Curb I R I s 5 00 I S 500 DO f6 00 1 5600 00 1 S 60000 emove P C C Dnvewa A ch I S 1100 I S 770 00 SS 00 5350 OD I 350 00 33 158 I LF I Remove Portron of Ex PCC Cyrb and Gutter g 5 00 (S 790 00 g10 00 S1,S6D 00 ; 1 580 00 at Hentlrta Ram 1 1 , 19 15 I 1 658 Sf I Remove Pvrtwn o! Ex PCC Sklewalk I S 2 DO S 3 31fi 00 Si 70 S2 818 fi0 S 2 818 60 4D lF W move PoNOn o! Ex Rock & CDhhle 0.emlmng S 2200 S BB000 g50 00 $2 000 OO S 2 000 OD , , ( 16 17 806 LF I Remove Po2pn of Ex Omin Unk Fence S 25 00 I S 20 150 00 59 00 1 53 224 DD I S 3229 DO B EA I Remove Portion of Fx Smnn Dale I 9100 I 728 00 165 00 5520 00 520 00 18 19 1 is Remove Exisbn Madung aM 5 in $ 6 500 00 I 6 500 00 S2 ODO 00 I 42 000 DD 2 000 W 5 EA (Remove Ewsbng Smrm Dain InIeVOUtlet ; 3,700 00 j 18,500 00 51,000 00 $5,000 00 S 5 000 W Struttu2 1 , 20 21 9 EA Remove Exlsbn 5 n 350 00 I 3 150 00 580 00 5720 00 RD 00 1 EA I Relo®te ExLgtln 9 n 100 00 I f lOD 00 5175 00 4175 QD 175 00 22 23 2 EA IRelo®te Exlsb Wami Post 20000 40000 817500 535000 35000 1 EA Relo®[e Ezubn UGII Handhole PUllbox f 12500 125 DO 550000 5500W 50000 24 S 170 4 LF I Relo®te &ISbn Fena 16 00 S 2 720 00 29 50 g5 015 00 5 015 00 EA Ralse Utlll Can antl Cover m Gade 550 00 f 2 200 OD 5105 OD 20 00 420 00 26 500 LF Sawcutnn 1000 500000 5300 5150000 150000 27 600 CV F Undasslfled Ez®vabon 20 W 12 000 00 7 00 200 00 4 200 00 28 29 130 Sfifi CV UndessHied FIII ( 12 00 f 1560 00 56 00 780 00 780 00 LF Channel Ez®vetion 4 250 S 41500 700 51162 DO 116200 30 24 CY Crushed reoate Base SD 00 1 200 00 4120 OD $2 880 00 2 BBD 00 31 2 EA Surtece Cbetin for Manholes SOD OD 1000 00 51000 00 2 000 00 2000 00 32 33 I 80 TON 0.s halt Convete Pavement ' 110 00 8 800 DO 4140 00 511 200 OD S 11 200 00 422 LF CDitl Plene 5 Wlde 25 W I 10 550 00 510 00 4220 00 S 4 220 OD 34 2 EA Adjust Manhole F2me end Cover m Finish ; 250 DO S 500 00 5500 00 $1,000 00 ; 1 000 00 G2de , 35 36 1 LS I 3' X i' Reinforced Conoete eox Culvert " 4 300 W 4 4 300 00 517 ODD 00 417 000 00 l7 ODO 00 10 LF 8 PCC Curb 30 00 300 00 g26 OD $260 001 260 DO 37 I 38 240 2fi LF Vedable Hei h[ D"Min 33" Maz PCC Curb I " " 50 00 12,0017 OD 528 00 6 720 00 6 720 OD 6 LF B PCC Curb & 2q Gutter 36 00 4 9 57fi 00 523 00 46 118 00 6 118 W 39 4 3B SF 1 8"PCC Dnve Ao mach I " S 5 SD S 209 00 4ID 001 5380 00 380 00 0 3 815 SF 1 9 PCC Sidewalk S S OD I 19 075 00 59 50 517 lfi7 50 17 167 50 41 74,442 I SF I 4"PCC Petlesman/eiryde Tail over ; 3 OD ; 223,32fi DD f3 00 $223,326 00 f 223 326 DO Comoatted Native , 42 1 ~ I lfietl Curb Ramp per APWASttl 1112, I g 2,300 ODI f 2,30000 52,00000 52,000W 000 00 S 2 3 Cese , 93 2 EA Motllfietl Curb Ramp per APWA Std 111 Z, $ 2,300 OD j 9,600 00 52,000.00 gq,000 00 1700 00 S 4 Case A T 2 1 , 49 1 EA 1 75' Wtde Curb Ramp per APWA Sid 111 2, $ S,DDD 00 S 5,000 00 52,600 00 52,600 DO S 2 600 W Case A T ce 5 1 , 45 I 4 4 EA I Hennosa Ave P C [ Access Ramos I " S 1 SOD 00 I S 6 000 00 51 000 001 54 000 001 S 4 000 OD 6 325 LF 1 18 Dia 14-Ga e C M P Smrtn Dain S 150 W I S 48 750 OD Sa2D 00 539 000 DD I f 39 OOD 00 97 1 LS Break Inm Ex Channel Wall and Connect " g 3,500 00 S 3,50000 53,000 W 53,000 00 ; 3 00000 ( P roposed 1B C M P Repair Channel as I I , Necessa 48 I 1 LS P ipe Connettion m Ex Stone Dain per qty S 3,000 00 ; 3,000 0D $3,400 00 53,400 00 4 3 400 W S td Plan 328 Case 3 , 49 2 I ~` m Daln m Ex RCP Smrm o tt M S 1,500 00 ( S 3,000 DD 5',600 W 33,200 OD S 3 200 00 p~n O t r ^ Saf I , __ 50 ~ 6 I EA 1 2" 14-Gage C M P Reser i f _ 1017 00 S 12 600 00 52 600 00 515 600 001 S 15 600 00 51 52 I 560 1 LF IT pbular Steel Fence I 40 00 I S 22 400 DO 5132 00 473 920 OD _ , _ S 73 920 00 6 EA IV ehDle Gale with Side Access 1 4 1 750 00 I 28 000 00 S2 200 001 535 200 00 35 200 OD 53 I 54 6 500 I LF 17 211 LI hbn Conduit Winn Pull boxes etc S 30 00 195 000 DO g25 00 4162 500 W S 362 500 00 I 47 EA l cebox type 7211 Ugh[s (mduding S 2,500 OD S 117,500 00 53,200 00 5150,400 00 ; 150 400 00 a u 1 , 55 I 56 I 16 EA A mm T pe jail ~ hts mdudm fountlabpns 4 3 900 00 52 400 00 59 IDO 00 4fi5 600 00 65 600 00 11 EA P etlesal/Elect2l Controllers for 7211 Uohts 3 8 500 00 I S 93 500 00 SS 600 00 561 600 00 1 4 61 fi00 00 57 58 6 668 LF 2 " Electnral Cnntlult I " 500 S 33 340 00 SB 00 453 344 00 I 53 349 00 2,457 LF 1 -1/9 Watt' Lme with Qwds Couplers, f 11 DO f 27,027 OD g11 50 S2G,255 SO ; 28 255 50 I in cluding connection m water main in street, , b ack0ow preventer, etc See No[e on Irngahon I Pl ans P138 20070104 PE[Ei Ph7J Bld Summary mod xis 1/9 01/OB/W rue i rnA4tS L ANU 3 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING ]ANUARY 4 2007 10 OOam Pacific Electr¢ Inlantl Em Ire Tall ConitrvcUOn from Ameth s[ ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE rt Low Brdder LLe Bullv-Mlller ContactmQ Co BID REM QTy UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST AMOUNT UNiT COST BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT B AFTER I CORRECTION9 I I 59 611 LF 1 1/2" Water Une with Qmrk Couplers, $ 35 OD S 21,385 00 049 00 529,939 00 S 29 93900 including mnnechon ¢ water mein m meet, , hack8ow preven[ey e¢ See Note on Imgauon Plans 60 795 LF 2" Water Une wiM Qwck Couplers, mdutling ; 50 00 f 37,250 00 8100 00 579,500 00 f 79 500 00 mnnecvon m water mom In sweet, barkflpw , nventer etc See Note on lni atwn Plans 61 1 15 IT2ff¢ Signal & Safety Ughbng at Archibaltl S 175,OOD 00 S 175,000 DO 578,000 00 f7B 000 00 S 78 00000 Ave , , 62 I 1 LS IT2ff¢:5ipiwl&Safety Ughbng e[Amethyst 5 175,00000 S S75,OD000 593,00000 593,00000 S 43 00000 Ave , 63 I 1 I LS (Traffic 6igial & Safety Ughbng at Hermosa $ 175,000 00 S 175,000 00 5127,OOD 00 5127 000 00 ; 127 000 00 Ave , , fi4 I 1 LS I Rnmona Ave Petlesrian Flashmc Sional 00 000 00 I S BO 000 W 849 000 OD I 549 000 00 I 49 00000 fi5 1 S 17afBc Sicnin Stn in 6 Upends 4 5 000 00 I 5 000 00 525 000 00 525 000 00 S 26 000 00 66 1 LS ITrafic Control I 10 000 00 1 SO OW 00 34 OOD 00 1 49 000 00 S 4 000 00 67 5 EA IRemovahk Polls I f 400 00 I 2 000 OD 51 500 W 7 500 00 1 S 7 500 W 6B I 1 LS I ISWPPP I B ODO 00 I S 8 000 00 525 000 00 325 OOD 00 1 25 D00 OD 1 Base &tl Total 15 1 971.206 00 s1 644 374 4o I S 1644 374A0 1 I ADDI TIVE LT R NA 8ID 1 NotD I I I ADDITIVE ALTER NATE RID Lentls® in 61m ahon I I 69 I 1 S I Mohllaatwn 55 000 00 55 ODO DO 5100 000 OD 5100 000 00 1 I S 100 ODO 00 70 92,151 SF I Landsmping (mdutlng soil preparebon, fine ; 1 65 f 152,09915 gl 65 5152 04915 ; 18 09915 adm muldi etc 1 , , 71 72 I 1 760 3 LF I LS P CC Concrete herder B th S 16 00 S 28 160 W SID 00 1 535 200 W 35 200 00 a Sipes Of Amethyst Sweet Imgatwn S 60,000 00 S 6Dp00 00 550,000 00 450 000 W $ 50 000 00 ~ ( System, D2wmg No 2043, sheet 22 of 28, , , Crntroiltt T' 73 1 S West Side of Andabaltl Avenue lmgation S 40,000 00 f 40,000 00 535,000 00 435,000 00 S 35 000 00 System, Drawing No 2093, sheet 22 of 28, , Cdiitrolh_r'H' 74 1 L9 Ens: Sitle of Amhibaltl Avenue Imgabon $ 40,OOD W S 40,000 DO 545,000 OD S45,D00 00 g 45 000 00 System, Dawing No 2117, sheet 27 of 35, , Controlltt'H' 75 1 LS Both Sues of Rnmona Avenue lmgabbn f fi0,W0 00 S 60,000 00 560,000 00 560,000 00 g 60 000 00 System, Dmwmq No 2117, sheet 27 of 35, , Controller G 76 1 LS Both Sides of hermosa Avenue lmgatwn $ 60,000 00 S fi0,000 00 560,000 DO 560,000 00 f fi0 000 00 System, Drewmg No 2117, sheet 2B of 35, , Controller'F 77 1 S Weft Side of Haven Avenue ]mgatron System, ; 40,000 00 f 90,000 00 390,000 00 f40,D00 DO $ 90 000 00 Drawing No 2117, meet 28 of 35, Cnntroller'A' , 78 79 I 807 2808 EA I EA 5 l Gat Gmundmver Ptanrs I G l S b f B 00 S 6 956 W SB W 46 956 00 f 6 956 00 a nru and Vines I f 25 OD I 70 200 OD 522 W 561 776 00 61 776 W 80 1 73 EA 12 4• Box Trees 356 00 25 988 00 4900 00 529 200 001 29 200 00 81 1 S 9 0.Da Maimm~anoe Perrod S 10 000 00 10 000 00 53 000 00 g3 000 00 S 3 000 W BZ 27 000 SF R wer Washed GreNte Cobblsmnes " 3 14 00 f 378 000 00 58 50 4229 500 00 S 229 500 W 83 136 EA 13 6 Boulders " f 325 00 S 44 2D0 00 350000 560 000 00 68 000 00 B4 I BS 109 124 I EA 12 EA I I 4 Boulders B" d 185 00 I 19 240 00 4300 00 31 200 00 31 200 W eb I Boul ers f 13 DO 15 500 00 150 00 418 60D 001 18 600 W 1 L$ IT afflc Control 19 000 W S 19 000 DO 515 000 00 I 515 000 00 1 f 15 000 W 87 1 LS IS WPPP $ 9000 00 S 9 000 00 SBS 000 00 585 000 00 BS 000 W Addlhve Altemate 8itl 2 Total 1 3 1132 ]93 35 I 41 124 981 15 f 1 124 981 15 I 1 DITi V L ERN T BID D o d Gen Tall and 1 tl Work BB B9 1 15 MoblivAbon " 50 000 00 I S 50 000 OD _ 520 000 00 520 000 001 S 20 000 00 1 838 TON 4 Decomposetl G2nlte Trail I " 75 00 I 137 850 00 90 00 S1fi5 920 W S 165 920 00 90 91 13 335 LF 6 P C C Heatler 1 LS T fF C g 12 00 160 020 00 gll 00 419fi fi85 00 . 74fi fi85 00 _ 2 lG ontrol _ ___ __ 11,500 00 ~_ 11,500 00 575,000 00 575 000 00 75 000 00 92 1 S ISWPPP 4 12 000 00 _ f 12 000 00 __ 520.000 DO 520 000 00 _ _ 4 20 000 00 Additive Alternate Bid 3 Total I I I S 371 370 00 I 6427 105 00 f 42] 105 00 1 ADDITI VE ALTERNATE BID4 Tall En Pilasters 93 1 L6 I Moblloabon 8 SDO 00 S B 500 DO 6 000 00 46 000 00 6000 W 94 8 EA 17211 Ent Pilasters 95 0 EA I I ll V t 8 000 00 4 69 000 00 411 000 00 588 ODD 00 BB 000 OD ns a ine artl lnt rebve Son I 20 000 W I 40 00 50 00 q0 001 8 - AddlDVe Alternate Bid 4 Total f 72,500 DO 594 000 00 94 ODO 00 I ADOSTIVE ALTERNATE BID 5 Amethys[T211heatl Work 96 1 LS Mobilization 75 000 00 25 000 W 535 000 00 835 OOD 00 35 000 00 97 1 I EA Dunkin Founbin 1 970 00 1 970 00 416 000 00 016 000 00 16 000 00 98 1 EA Epueshen Drmkinp Pountain S 1 970 OD 4 ! 970 00 519 000 00 419 000 00 4 14 000 00 P139 20070104 PEIET Ph23 Bitl Summary mad xis 2/9 Ol/08/07 PEIFT PHASES 2 AND 3 8I0 SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JANUARY 4 2007 ~ 10 OOam Patifit Eletnm lnlantl Em ve T211 Constructmn from AmeM st I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE I a of LOw Brdtler 6u11 -Miller ContracYm Co I BID ITEM QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST 8ID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT ry AFTER I CORRECTIONS I I 99 100 101 102 103 SD9 1 I EA I 1 EA i 1 I EA 1 EA I i EA I Pom¢ Teble IEOUSYnen HRrhmo Rall ITresh 0.a2otade IBi a Rack ITrail Si nacre wIM Pilasters ' I S 855 00 14 855 00 1 S 750 00 I S 750 00 I f 525 00 S 525 OD f 500 OD I 500 W I f 2D 000 00 S 20 000 00 52000 001 51 800 00 S9DD 00 Sl 500 00 E36 000 00 52 000 00 S'_ B00 00 1 5900 W I 51 500 DD 535 000 00 I t 2000 00 ~ S 1 B00 00 I S 900 00 I 1 500 00 35 000 00 105 106 1072 SF 192 LF 29 T N 1 M Thltk Fire 0.ebNant Finish COncrece I6" W itle Concrete Header er CI ~ Std 534 " I 6 50 S 6 968 00 25 00 q 800 00 f7 001 518 00 7 509 00 S3 956 00 7 509 DO 3 456 OD 107 O 1 LS I I 4 Denim sed GrnOIM Area SWPPP Atldihve Alternate Bid 8 Toral I 100 00 I 2 400 00 750000 I8 750000 I S 73,238 00 I 90 00 8/500000 I 52 160 00 SS500000 5134 320 00 I I 2 160 00 S 1500000 S 134 320 00 I I Total Bid w/All Alternates Tatal I I S 3 621 109 15 I S 3 424 780 55 I S 3A24 760 55 I I I I I I I I Kam Landsm in Int 20 0% Bravo 9 n & Desm Inc 2 2% Be d Envwnmental Serves 0 2% I RE Schafeer Ent I 0 8% I Cavanubias Bros 0 5% I I I Gown Fenn I 30% I I Lmmin PadF¢ I 22 0% P140 20070109 PEIET Ph23 Bid Summary mod zk 3/9 01/08/07 PEfET PHASES 2 AND 3 DTA1 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING 3ANUARY 4 2007 ~ SO ODam Padfic Elecvm Inlantl Em t2 Trail Cgnstruc6on fmm Ameth rt M W I e a a Ente uses Griffith Com an I I I 1hM QTY UNIT DESCRiFTION UNIT COSI 8ID AMOUNT 8ID AMOUNT UNIT COST 8ID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT # AFTER AF iE0. I CORRECRONS CORREC710N5 BASE Bi0 I I I 1 1 1 S 2 I I IMOhlhtabon 580 000 00 480 000 00 1 8D 000 DD 5148 000 7D 5198,000 70 1 f ]q8 000 70 1 S ICleanna & Grubbm f50 000 00 1 350 000 00 50 000 00 Sfi8 000 00 1 S6B OOD 00 1 S 68 000 00 3 I 70 1 LF I Remove Smne Wall 530 00 i S2 300 00 1 S 2 100 OD 530 W 1 S2 128 00 1 5 2 128 OD 4 .I q 130 I SF IRemwe Lanosm ino & Parkmq Ama Sl 50 1 S6 195 00 1 6 195 00 41 72 1 57 103 60 1 S 7 103 60 5 232 I LF 6 I 3 I EA IRemwe Roll I Re P rt 415 00 43 980 00 S 3 480 00 Sll 30 1 52 621 60 1 f 2 621 fi0 move o 5150 00 5450 00 1 450 00 5224 00 1 1672 00 1 S 672 00 7 I 3 EA 8 2 619 SF IRemwe Ex6on Tree IRe A C P 5800 00 1 52 900 00 1 4 2 400 DO 5537 OD I 41 fill 00 1 S 1 611 00 mwe avement fl SD 33 921 OD I 3 921 00 33 75 1 59 802 50 9 802 50 9 261 I SF IRemwe P C C Pavement 43 50 5702 50 I 963 SD 1 ID 97 I LF R P C C C b tl 52 20 Sfi18 20 1 518 20 emove ur an Gutter 59 00 8873 00 873 00 510 SD 41 018 SD I S 1 018 50 11 12 I SDD 70 LF SF Remove P C C Curb R P C C D 47 00 $700 OD 700 00 54 D6 8406 00 1 406 00 emove nvewa poach S2 50 4175 00 4 175 00 52 % 5203 00 1 S 203 00 13 158 LF 1Remove POHIg0 of Ez P C C am and Gutter 410 00 51,580 DO S 1,580 00 ;7 10 $1 121 W f 1 121 BO aC Hendlra Rem s , , 14 15 1 658 40 SF LF Remove Portion of Ex P C C Sltlewalk Rem P m f E 42 2D 43 647 fi0 S 3647 6D 5125 52 072 50 2 072 50 ove o On o x Rock & Cobble Remmmg ( 540 00 81,600 00 ; 1,600 00 ;30 % 216 00 51 S 1 216 OD wall , , 16 806 LF Remove Portion pf Ex Chein Unk Fence 9 DO 47254 00 7254 00 g2 10 41 692 60 17 8 FA Remove Pomon of Fx Storm Dam 4100 DO 3800 00 1 800 00 5254 00 2 032 OD 1 fi92 60 2 032 00 18 19 1 5 LS EA Remove Ezrsnn Markin antl Smpin R E l 41500 00 1 500 00 S 1 500 00 42 500 00 52 500 00 1 2 500 00 emove x sbng Smnn D21n InIeVOutlet S2,OOD 00 $10,000 00 $ 10,000 00 52,300 00 411 500 DO ; 11 500 00 Structure , , 20 21 9 1 EA EA Remove Exisbn Sin I R l E n 5150 00 Sl 350 OD 1350 00 110 00 5990 00 1 990 00 e gm[e zis n Sin 5300 00 E300 00 I 300 00 4165 00 41fi5 00 1 165 OD 22 2 EA Relocate Exlsbn Wamin Post 530000 560000 1 600W 416500 f330W S 33000 23 1 EA IRelo®te Exlsdno UUli Handhole/PUllbox 480000 1 580000 80000 453000 1 453000 15 530 DD 24 170 LF I Relomm Exlsbn Fenre 465 00 411 1150 00 S 11 050 W 53100 1 SS 270 00 5 270 00 25 4 EA I Palle Utlll Cen and Corer m Gade f600 00 32 400 00 I 2 400 OD 4270 00 1 51 080 00 1 4 1 OBO 00 2fi 500 LF ISewputbn 4200 Sl 000 OD I S 1 000 00 44 50 1 S2 250 00 1 2250 OD 27 I 600 CY F Unuassified Exravabon 435 00 I 521 000 00 21 000 W 480 00 448 000 OD S q8 000 00 28 29 I 130 I 166 CY LF Undesslfietl FlII IG l E 420 00 S2 600 00 S 2600 00 5470 00 1 sfi1 100 00 1 f 61 Igo 00 anne zmvabgn 570 OD Sll 620 001 S 11620 W 59 80 1 41 626 801 f 1 62fi AO 30 31 24 2 I C EA ICnuhetl oregam Base rf IS C b f 445 001 Sl 080 00 I S 1080 00 5420 001 410 OAD oD I S 10 080 00 u ece m n or Manholes 4500 00 1 gl 000 00 S 1000 DO 5265 DD I 4530 001 53000 32 I 80 TON halt Gncrete Pavement 5110 DO 58 800 00 f 8 800 W S20D 001 Sib 000 001 f lfi 000 00 33 422 LF GItl Plane 5' Wlde 534 001 419 348 00 S 14 348 110 49 101 53 890 201 S 3890 20 34 2 EA Adlust Manhole Fame and Gver m Finch $1,000 00 52,000 00 g 2,000 00 5740 OO 51 980 00 480 00 S 1 Gade 1 , , 35 1 LS 3' X I' Reinforced Concrete Box Curvett 52 SDO DO 52 500 00 2 500 00 7 I 36 I 10 LF I B" P C C C b S 200 00 57 200 001 7 200 00 ur 425 OD I 8250 00 S 250 00 549 00 5490 00 f 490 00 37 38 240 266 LF LF I Vermble Heioht 0" Min 33" Max P C C Curb B' P " E45 00 510 800 00 S 10 800 00 E51 00 412 240 00 S 32 290 00 C C Curb & 24 Gutter " 425 00 f6 fi5D 00 6 650 00 839 00 410 374 00 f 10 379 00 39 40 38 3 815 SF 1 B P C C Dnve roach " 47 50 285 00 285 00 SB 00 4304 00 309 00 SF 9 P C C Sltlewalk " 43 75 19 306 25 I 14 306 25 89 801 418 312 00 18 312 W 41 74,492 SF 1 9 P C C Pedestran/Brryde Tall over g3 SD $260,547 00 $ 260,547 00 S2 65 $197 27130 f 197 271 30 Comoaaed Nawe 1 , , 42 1 EA Motllfied Cum Ramp per APWA Std 111-2, $2,300 00 52.300 00 $ 2,300 00 $3,100 00 $3 100 DO 100 OD g 3 Case A T 1 1 , , 43 2 EA Modified Cum Ramp per APWA Std 111-2, $2,50000 $5,00000 f 5,000 OD ;4,!3000 88 26000 f 8 26000 Case A T 2 , , 44 1 EA 25' W Ide Curb Ramp per APWA Sid 111-2, 53,400 00 $3,400 00 40000 S 3 54 120 00 84 120 00 4 D Case A T 5 , , , 1 $ ,120 D 95 % 4 325 EA LF Hermosa Ave P C C Access Ramos lA" D 1 G $1 000 00 9 000 00 9 000 00 42 800 00 gll 200 W S it 200 00 a 4 age C M P Storm Dain 485 OD $27 625 00 4 27 675 00 5200 00 465 000 001 65 000 00 47 1 LS Break Into Ez Gannel Well antl Connett " $8,000 00 48,000 00 f 8,000 00 f4,000 DO 54,000 00 000 DO S 4 Pmposetl 1B C M P Repa,r Channel as , Neressa 48 1 1 is 1 PIpe Connecvon m Ex Smrm Dam per Clry 1 55,000 DO 1 55,000 00 5 5,000 00 52,000 00 52 000 OD 000 DO f 2 S td Plan 328 Case 3 , , 49 2 EA 1C Dnnec[ C M P Smrm Dam m Ex RCP Smrm $3,100 OO 56,200 OO S fi,200 00 41,325 OD 52 650 W $ 2 fi50 00 Dreln r CI Std Plan 311 , ( , SD 5 6 EA 11 2' 34Ga e C M P Riser 52 200 001 5~3 200 00 j j_ 13,200 00 $2,750 00 I 416 500 00 f lE 5000 1 560 LF (T ubular Seel Fence 5130 001 572 800 001 S 72 800 00 591 00 , 450 %0 00 ~ S 50 960 00 52 I 53 I 16 E SOD EA IV LF T ehlde Ge[e with S~tle Amens 11 LI h G tl 41200 001 419 200 00 I S 19 200 00 53 030 00 448 480 001 9B 980 DD 2 nno n ult Win Pull boles etc SS 001 4162 500 00 1 5 162 500 OD 422 501 4146 2501701 S 146 250 00 54 47 1 EA 15 hcebox Type Tall Lights Qndutlin9 42,300 001 4108,100 00 S 108,100 00 51,470 00 469 090 00 $ 69 090 00 f oundations 1 , 1 , 55 I 56 16 11 EA A EA I P mm T Tali LI htsOndutlino foundabons tl l/El l C ll 53 ]00 00 459 200 00 4 59 200 00 44 400 00 470 400 001 4 70 900 00 esa e ema ontro ers for Tail Uchts 57 500 00 582 500001 82 500 00 $6250 00 866 75000 68 750 00 57 58 6 668 2 957 LF 2 LF 1 ' ElecVi®I Gndul[ 1 4"W L 410 DO 466 fi60 00 4 66 680 00 516 901 4112 689 201 S 112 689 20 , - / ater ine with Qmck Cquplers, 4900 422,11300 S 22,11300 42650 565 111150 11050 S 65 in dudm6 mnnecbon m water main in streeq , , b ackflow preven[eq etc See Note on imoaban 1 Pl ans 20070109 PEIET Ph13 Bid Summary mod xis 4/9 01/08/07 eID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING ]ANUARY 4 2007 ~ 10.OOam P142- Pat lfic Electric Inlantl Em ire Trall Coriztrumon fmm Ameth st I I Me a Wa Ente rises Griffith Coin an BID I I I ITEM QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT UNII COST BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT * AFTER AFTER I CORRECRDNfi CORRECTIONS 59 611 LF 1-1/2'Wa4r line wlrh Qmrk Couplers, 53500 521,3850 0 ; 21 38500 4780 0 mdudmg mnneRan to water main in soee[, , 447,65800 S 97,6580D back8ow preventer, eta See Not_ on Imoahon PIan3 60 745 LF 2" Water Ltne wlm Qmrk Couplers, mdutling 57D 00 852 150 0 0 $ 52 150 OD 89 0 mrlnemon to water main m sheet, barkflow , , 0 5 566,3050D S 66,305 DD reventar etc See Note on Imioabon Plans 61 1 L9 Treff¢Signal&Safery Lighting at Archibald $90,00000 $90,000 O D$ 90 Op000 b72 00000 72 00 Ave , , $ A DO f 72,000 OD 62 1 LS I p ffic Signal & Safety Uphbnp at 0.memyst 851,000 00 551,000 00 $ 51,000 OD 556 000 00 856 000 W ~ , , I S 56,000 OD 63 I 1 I LS pre fbc 5lgnal & Safety Ughbnp a[ Ffennosa 5347,000 00 1 5147,000 OO 5 197,000 00 4145 000 OO 5145 000 00 ~ 1 , I , S 195,000 W 69 I 1 I S I Ramona Ave Pedestrian Flashinc Signal 457 D00 00 457 OOp OD I S 57 000 00 S5 000 00 65 I 66 1 Lfi I Treffic Signm Stn m & Legends 525 000 00 525 D00 Op I 25 000 OD . 520 000 00 551 000 W 520 000 00 f 51 000 00 1 f 2 67 1 5 LS A TrefNc Control 520 000 00 20 OOD 00 S 20 000 00 g8 000 00 48 ODO 00 0 000 00 1 B 000 00 68 E Removable Posts 800 00 DDD o0 4 ODO 00 720 00 3600 00 1 LS SWPPp 43000000 SID 000 OO IS IO OOD OD 81200000 41200000 3 600 OD S 12 D0000 Bane Bid Total I Sl 698 017 34 I 1 5 S.fi98 298 34 I b1.e93 906 00 I S 1 693 906 00 AODITI V ALTER NAT BID N I I o U d I D01lTVE ALTER NA SD I I I I I ntls i & io 69 70 1 92,151 is SF Moblilzabon Lantlstapmg pndutlmg sollprepa2don fine BO 000 00 2 480 000 00 I Bp 000 00 555 534 60 55 534 60 55 534 60 , redm mulch etc 50 5 5230,37750 15 230,377511 5130 5119,79630 S 119,7%30 71 72 1 760 1 LF LS P C C Concrete Header Both Sides of Amethyst Street Im abon 530 00 60 0 852 600 00 1 4 52 600 00 526 DD 445 760 00 S 45 760 00 g System, Drawing No 2043, saes[ 22 0(28, , 4 00 00 S60,OOD 00 ; 60,000 W 522,000 00 522,000 00 f 22,000 DD Controller 7' 73 1 LS West 9de of Artitlbald Avenue ImBahon $30,000 00 530,000 00 f 30,000 W S2D 000 00 520 000 OD System, Drawing No 2093, sheet 22 gf 28, , , S 20,00D OD Cgntroller'H' 74 1 is Eas' Side gf Archlbaltl Avenue IRIgabOn $3D,DDD 00 g30,D00 DO § 30,000 00 $8 000 00 58 000 00 System, Drawing No 2117, sheet 27 of 35, , , S 8,D00 00 Cgntrolkr'H' 75 1 LS Both Slaes of Ramona Avenue Imgatwn 460,000 00 460,000 OD ; 60,000 00 525 300 00 SS 300 O 'rv ~ Na 2117, sheet 27 of 35, nl , , D f 25,300 00 Cnntro ler G 76 1 LS Both Sines of Hermosa Avenue Imgabon S60,OOD OD S6D,D00 DD S 60 000 W 430 000 00 3 I System, DrdwinB No 2117, sheet 2g of 35, , , ; 0,00000 3 30,1100 00 Controller'F 77 1 LS Weft Bide of Haven Avenue Imgabon System, 530,000 00 530,000 00 g 30 000 00 SID 600 D0 10 600 0 Drawing No 2117, sheet 28 of 35, Controller'A' , , ¢ , 0 $ 10,600 00 78 I 807 1 EA 1 1 Gal Greundmver Plants 48 00 S6 456 00 3 6 456 00 7 10 79 2 BOB EA 5 Gal Shrub and Vines 520 001 556 160 OD 45 729 701 f 5 729 70 80 I 73 EA 1 24" Boz Trees 4320 001 56 160 00 515 30 I 442 %2 40 i S 42 %2 40 81 I 1 S 1 940a Maintenance Period 510 000 001 523 360 001 410 OOD 00 t 23 360 00 S 30 0 2282 00 520 SB6 00 f 2D SB6 00 82 27 000 SF I Rrver Washed Granite Cgbblesmnes 412 DD 324 000 00 I 00 00 f 324 000 OD ES 000 00 45 000 001 S 5 000 W B3 136 EA 1 36" Boulders 5300 001 gqp gpp W I 513 00 535 000 00 351 000 W 89 104 EA 29" Boulders 5275 00 q0 600 00 41 W 00 19 040 00 +9 040 00 BS 124 EA 18" Boulders 28 60D DO 8 2B 60D 00 3126 DO 513 109 00 13 iD4 W gfi 1 LS Traffic Control 5250 00 531 000 00 31 000 00 5305 00 413 020 00 13 020 00 87 1 LS SWPPP E15 000 00 515 000 00 5 15 000 00 SB 000 00 48 000 001 S B 000 00 I Addl6ve AI[emata Bid 2 Tobl 10000001 I SSO OOO OOI S 1000000 4x2000001 412000001 5 1200000 I I S117B 553 50 I I S 1.176 553 40 s627A33 00 I S 827 433 00 DD V RNATE B D 3 s Gra I T II and la I i Wo BB 1 I is Mobllaahon B9 1 838 TDN 4' Demmoosed Game T211 50 OOD 00 sfiD DDD DD S 50 000 00 399 D00 00 99 000 00 49 000 00 90 13 335 LF 6" P C C Header 4100 00 5380 DDD DD SB3 800 DD 597 00 4178 2Bfi W 178 286 W 91 1 LS ITreffic Control 416 00 $213 360 00 I 213 360 00 416 OD 4213 360 00 213 360 00 __ _ 92 1 L5 SW PPP S31/000 00 15 000 00 1 4 15 D00 DO 521 000 Op 421,000 00 21 000 DO Atltllhve AI[ema[e Bitl 3 Total 410 000 DO I 410 000 00 I f 10 000 00 531 000 00 4310000 00 ~ ODO 00 I I I 5668 360 DO 1 5 471160 DO 5492646 OD I S 492 64fi 00 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE eID 9 T II E I I I 2 n PIIaslels 93 I S IMObllvatlon 94 B I EA Trell En Pllas[ 530000001 510000001 1000000 530900001 SID 40000 f 1040000 ers 95 I 0 EA Ilnsbll Vme am Inte retrve Sin 46 500 001 0 p0 gfi8 ODO 00 S 68 000 00 58 200 00 465 600 00 65 6D0 00 Adtlinve AI[ema[e e,d 4 Total 576,000 00 4 S 76 DDD OD I S 576 000 00 1 S 7fi 000 DO ADOIfIVE ALTERNATE BID 5 A th T me s[ railheatl Work % I LS Mobllvabon 97 1 I FA I Dnnkin Fountain 850 000 001 550 000 001 4 50 000 00 513 300 00 Sl° 300 D01 S 1' 300 00 9B 1 I EA I Eguestnan Drinking Fountain 4H 000 001 SB 000 OD 15 B 000 00 57 700 001 57 700 001 S 7 70D 00 48 000 001 SB DOD 001 S 8 OOD OD 32 D00 001 52 000 001 S 2 000 00 20070104 PEIET Ph23 Bid Summary mod xk 5/9 Dl/DB/D7 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING ]ANUARY 4 2007 @ 10 ODam I P143 Pad 6c Electr¢ lnlantl Em ire Troll Construction from Ameth rt 1 M 1 a Wa Ente nses GrlfOth Com n 1 I I I BID ITEM QTY UNIT DESCRIPIION UNIT COST BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT UNIT COST EID AMOUNT 8ID AMOUNT # AFTER AFTER CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONS 99 100 101 IW 103 104 105 106 I 107 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 072 I 192 24 1 I EA EA EA EA EA I SF I Lf I TON LS Pirnlc Tahle IE uestnan Hltchma Rall Trash Receotede I6KYde Rntlt IT211 Sioneoe with PlWsters 19" Thick fire Remrtlant finish Concrete I6" Wide Concrete Heacer cer G Std 534 I 14' Demmoosed Granite Area ISWPPP Adtlttrve Alternate &tl 5 Total 83 000 00 4250000 41 500 Op I 51500 WI 427000 D01 530 001 420 001 5150 OD 410 000 00 53 000 D0 4 52500001 41 500 W I S 51500001 827000 OOIf 530 720 00 I f 53 890 001 f 53 600 001 5 410 000 DO S 5129 66D 00 14 3 000 00 250000 1 SOD 00 150000 2700000 10 720 DO 3 B40 00 3 600 00 10 000 DO 129 66D Op 52.150 00 S27D000 S2 270 00 52/50001 S23D000I 520 001 550 001 SSOD 00 SS,ODO OD I I 2 150 00 1 427000O S f2 270 W I S 421500015 52300001 521 490 W 1 S E9 600 001 S 812 000 001 S 45 000 001 f 4103 310 00 14 2 150 OD 2700 OD 2 270 00 215000 230000 Z3 940 pp 9 600 W 12 D00 00 5 ppp pp 82 610 D0 I I Total Bid w/All Alternates Total S 3 752 590 85 I S 3 556 671 85 S 3 393,295 00 I S 3 372 595 00 1 1 i I i I Z 1 ( T I I 1 ( I I EES I United Few Erectors RAM Enomeen I Su or Pavement Markincrs I Brew S n 8 Desvan CMV Electnc 12% 5% I 3% I 1% I 1% I I7% V&E Tree B2w 5 n & Design ROrk 5[ruttures GOwn Fence R E Smeefer 4nmin PatlfK I I I I I not stetai not Sbbad not sorted no[ statsl no[ stated no[ rated I I 20070104 PEIET Ph23 Bid Summary mad x1s 6/9 01/08/07 9I D SUMMARY FOR 6ID OPENING ]ANUARY q 2007 ~ 10 OOam P144 P atlfic 6leccnc Inland Em ire Trail Constucbpn from Ameth at Rrverntle Construction Co l I m an nc 4-Con En meennD lnc 8 I I I i7 EM QTY UNIT DSCRIPTION UNR COST BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT UNIT COST BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT * AFTER CORRECTIONS CORRECTIONS B SE 8ID I I I I 1 2 1 I S I Mabdluhon 1 LS ICleannp & Grubhln 5225 000 OD 4225 000 00 S 22.1 000 DO $210,000 00 I 5210 000 00 I 1 S Z10 00000 3 70 I LF I Rempve Stone Wall 5275 000 00 4275 000 00 275 000 00 520 000 00 520 000 OD I S 20 000 00 4 9 130 SF IRemove Lantlsm mp & Parkin Ar a E6 00 4520 00 S 420 OD 5100 00 q7 000 W 7 000 00 5 e 232 LF IRemove Rall 1 00 44 130 00 4 130 00 §3 00 44130 00 1 4 4 130 OD 6 3 EA IRemove Post 40 00 41 856 00 I 1 856 00 412 00 42 789 00 1 2 78400 7 I 3 EA IRemove Exumn Tree 550 00 8150 00 1 4 150 00 5300 00 4900 00 1 S 90p pp 8 2619 SF Remove AC Pavement Si 500 00 5100 S9 500 00 1 1 5 9 500 00 51 000 00 53000 00 S 3 000 00 9 I 281 SF IRemovePCC Pavement 4100 5261400 1 15 261400 5100 S~fi1900 15 2fii9W 1D I 97 LF IRemwe P C C Curb and G tt 528100 14 28100 5250 1 570250 15 7p25p 11 u er lOD LF I Remove P C C Curb 53 00 5291 00 1 291 00 510 00 1 4970 00 1 970 00 12 70 SF Remove P C C Dnvewa A ch 53 DO $1 00 8300 00 4 300 00 45 00 550000 500 00 13 158 LF IRemove Portlpn of Ex P C C Curb and Gutter E3 00 470 00 4474 DO 4 70 00 44 00 5280 00 280 00 at Handl®o Ram I $ 479 DD 810 00 81,580 00 S 1,580 00 14 1658 SF IRemwe Pomon of Ex P C C 9dewalk 51 00 Sl 658 OD Y 15 40 LF Remove Portion of Ex Rpck & Cobble Retaining 46 00 1 65B DO 52 00 I 43 316 00 1 S 3 31600 I Wall 5290 00 1 S 240 00 5100 00 84,00000 1 S 4,000 W 16 806 I LF IRemove Portion of Ex Uam Unk Fenre f3 50 1 17 8 EA IRemwe Port1Dn of Ex 5ronn Dram 42 821 00 2 fl21 00 7 00 85 642 00 5692 00 SB 1 LS IRemwe Ezlstln Marklnq antl Str1 m 465 OD 500 DO 8520 00 520 00 4135 00 41 080 00 1 080 W 19 5 EA Remove Exlsnnp 5tonn Dram lnleUOWe[ I 81 00000 5500 00 5 00000 500 00 51 500 00 41 500 DD I 1500 00 SIn1CWre , ; , ; 5,00000 41,00000 $5,00000 S 5,00000 20 21 g 1 I EA IRemwe Eze:bn S1 n EA I Relomte Ezlson 51 n 5150 OD Sl 350 W I 1 350 00 4100 00 5900 00 900 W 22 2 EA IRelomte EZlsnn Waminp PoSt 5500 00 5250 00 4500 00 1 I 500 00 5900 00 5400 00 S qpp W 73 1 E4 I0.elpm[e Existr U[II Hantlhole/PUllbpx 525000 550000 525000 500 OD 1 450000 SI 00000 f 100000 24 170 LF I Relocate EzutinD Fence 435 00 75000 860000 460000 1 60000 25 4 EA Ra1se Utlll Can and Cover ro Gatle 5250 00 E5 950 00 f 5 950 00 527 00 44 590 00 4 590 Otr 26 500 LF ISawrumn g1 000 00 1 000 00 5200 00 5000 00 800 W Z7 I 600 CY F I UndasslFled Eztavatron 1 00 55 000 W 500 00 4 00 52 000 00 200000 2B 130 1 CY Wndassifletl FlII 15 00 5250 00 D 00 1 9 000 00 5295 00 5147 OOD 00 147 000 OD 29 I 166 LF I Channel Excavation 532 500 00 4 32 500 00 4245 00 531 850 00 1 31 850 W 30 29 CY ICruthetl o ate Base 12 00 Sl 992 00 I 1 99200 SIO 00 El 660 001 1660 00 31 2 I EA Surtax Coatrnp far Manholas 550 00 Sl 200 00 1200 00 5750 00 Sfi 000 001 6 000 00 32 80 TON IAS halt Concrete Pavement 4250 00 5500 001 500 00 §500 00 41 000 00 f 1 000 OD 33 422 LF Coltl Plane 5' W 1de 8180 00 $14400 00 14400 00 5350 00 812000 00 12 000 00 39 2 EA Adlust Manhole Frame entl Cover ro Flnlsh 10 00 5750 W 4q 220 00 1 4 220 00 423 OD E9 706 00 9 706 00 Grade ,500 00 5 S 1,500 00 5600 00 41,200 00 ; 1,200 00 35 1 1 I LS 13' X 1' Relnfo¢ed Conceete Box Culvert " f6 000 00 f6 000 00 5 6000 00 S7 500 OD I 47 500 001 36 10 LF IB P C C Curb 515 001 5350 00 150 00 7 500 W 37 240 LF IVanahle Height 0' Mtn 33" Max P C C Curb 528 OD E6 720 00 4 7 530 00 4300 00 300 00 38 26fi LF 18" P C C Curt & 24"Gutter 528 DO 6 20 00 425 00 46 000 00 6000 00 39 38 SF IB" P C C Dave A roach S7 498 00 7448 00 32 00 Se 512 00 8 51200 40 3 815 SF 4" P C C Sltlewalk 412 00 6 00 45fi DO 456 00 812 00 5456 00 S 456 OD 41 74,942 SF 4" P C C Pedestrian/B¢yde Tail over E3 10 522 890 00 2 22 890 00 SS 00 19 075 0 S 19 075 00 I ComDattetl Natne 5 30,770 20 S 230,770 20 E5 00 4372,210 OOI S 372,21000 42 I 1 EA IMedified Curt Ramp per APWA Std Ila 2, 51,50000 51 50000 S 1 50000 51 8000 Case A T 1 , , , 0 $1,800 OOI S 1,60000 43 2 E4 Mpolnetl Curb Ramp cer APWA Std 1112, 51,50000 83,000W t 3 00000 §90000 Case A T 2 , 41,80000 S 1,800W 44 1 I EA 25' Wltle Curh Ramp per APWA 5Itl 111 2, 42,000 00 000 DD $2 $ 2 000 00 250 OD 4 Case A T 5 , , x, 41,250 DO S 1,250 W 45 46 4 315 EA Hermosa Ave P C C A¢ess Rams F " Sl 200 00 El 200 00 S 4 800 00 Si 000 00 49 000 00 S q Op0 00 47 1 L 18 Dix 14Ga e C M P 5tgrm Da1n L Y100 00 832 500 00 t 32 500 00 4100 00 432 500 001 S 32 500 00 S Break Into Ex Channel Wall and CpnneG 51,500 00 51 50000 S 1 500 00 5750 00 IPmposefl 18" C M P Repair Channel as , , 5750 W S 750 00 Necessa 4B 1 t5 P1ce Connection ro Ez Storm Da1n per Clry $1,500 00 51 500 00 g 1 500 00 600 00 Std Plan 328 Case 3 , , 8 4600 00 $ 600 00 49 2 EA I Connect C M P Storm Dram to Ex RCP Storm 41,500 00 $3 000 00 $ 3 000 00 500 D Da1n r G ~ 5[d PWn 311 , , 8 O ;1,000 001 ; 1,000 00 _50 51 _ 6 560 EA 112" 14Gaoe C M P 0.1 r __ LF ITUbular Steel Fence 52 000 00 512 000 W 12,000 00 SI 200 00 ___ 57,2170 001 S 7 200 00 52 I 16 EA I Vehltle Gale with Slde Arms 495 001 52 000 001 553 200 001 53 200 00 4120 00 567 200 001 S 67 200 00 53 E SDD Lf IT211 Ughtrnp Conduit W Inn Pull bows etc sss DD 432 000 00 I f 162 SDO 00 1 S 32 ODO 00 4 f2 300 DO 536 800 001 S 36 BDO 00 54 47 EA 5hoebpx Type T211 Lights (1nUuding $3 200 00 5350 400 00 162 500 DD $ 15 4 525 50 4165 750 00 S 165 750 00 fountlahons , , Q 00 00 4.,700 DO 79, $ 90000 S 79,90000 55 56 16 Il EA Acom T Trell Uohts lndudm founda0ons EA Peoesml/Elettal Controllers far T211 l nt 44 000 00 464 000 00 69 000 00 43 000 00 848 000 001 S 98 000 DO 57 6 668 JD s LF 12" Electntal Cpndult 45 OOD 00 455 000 00 S 55 000 00 44 000 00 I 544 000 00 94 000 00 58 2,457 LF 1-I/4" Water Line wIN QmU< Cpuplers 415 00 SB 00 4100 020 00 g 100 020 00 419 501 4130 026 001 f 130 026 OD , mdudmg mnnepbon m water mom m streeq 419,656 00 S 19,fi56 00 520 SO 550,368 SO S 50,368 50 baCk(ow pn'.v2ntar, e[C SEE Nob? On ImpaGOn I I IPlans 20070104 PQET Ph27 81d Summary mod zls 7/9 01/08/07 BID SUMMARY FOR eI D OPENING JANUARY 4 2007 ~ 10 OOam P145 Pad fic'Electn c Inlantl Em tre Trail Construction from Ameth at Rlversltle Construction C l I I om an nc 4- Con En mcenn , lnc ' I I I I BID ITEM QTY UIJIT DESCRIPTION UIJIT COST BID AMOUN7 BID AMOUNT UNiT COST BID AMOUM HID AMOUNT y AFTER AFTER I I CORRECTi0N5 CDRRECTIONS I I I I 59 611 LF 1-I/2" Water lJne with Quirk Couplers, 010 00 46,110 OD ; 6,110 OD 521 OD 831 00 512 S 12 83 mdudmq mnnecbon to water main mstreet, - , , 1 OD backpow preven[er, etc See Note on Imgabon Plans 60 795 LF 2"Water Una with Qmck Couplers, including $1500 511 17500 ; 11 17500 42000 mnnecbon to water main In street, haddbw , , 319,90000 S 14,90000 reventer etc See Note on Impahon Plans 61 1 LS e I: Signet & Safety Lighting at Archibald A §80,000 00 580,000 00 f 80,000 DD 4!60,000 00 $160 000 W S 160 000 W v ~ , I , 62 I 1 I LS Iq~ffa: Signal & Safety Ughbng a• Amehyst 545,000 DD 545,000 00 S 45,000 00 $51 000 OD $51 000 00 S 51 000 00 I , I , , 63 1 LS I7aff¢ Signal & Safety Lighting at hemwsa 5125,000 00 51?5,000 OD ; 1?i,000 OD 5191,000 OD 5191 000 00 S 191 000 OD Ave , , 64 I fi 1 I LS I Ramona Ave Petlettnan Flashlno Sipnal 450 OOD DO 550 000 00 I 50 000 00 458 000 00 I 458 000 DO I S s8 ODD 00 5 66 1 S ITrdfDC Slonm Sm in & Leaentls 525 000 OD I 525 000 00 25 ODO 00 526 000 OD 42fi 000 OD 26 000 00 67 1 5 LS I EA 17aff¢ Control R 15 000 00 415 000 OD ! s 000 00 525 ODD 00 25 000 00 S 000 OD fiB 1 LS emovable Postr SWPPP 750 00 43 750 D0 3 750 DO 4700 00 3 500 OD 3 500 00 525 000 00 42 500 00 1 5 25 000 00 20 000 W 52 000 00 ~ f 20 000 00 Base Hid Total 51 960.232 2D f 1960 Z32 20 I 52 149 933 00 I S 2 544 933 00 ADDITI VE A TER NATE ID 1 Nat U etl I ADD L RN I BID 2 I I I ntls m e abo 69 70 I 1 151 92 I LS I SF Mobdrzabon Lendsmping (Includin still t fi 4125 000 00 5325 000 00 I 125 000 00 545 000 00 I 545 00000 I f 45 000 OD , q prepara wn, ne p2dm mulch etc gl 00 592,!51 W 5 92,151 00 f0 70 569,505 7D f 69,505 70 71 72 1 760 LF P C C Concrete Heatler 510 00 417 600 OD S 17 600 DD S 14 W 829 69000 24 640 W 1 IS Both Sides of Amethyst Street Imgabon 535,000 DO $35,000 00 S 35,000 W 857,000 W $57 000 DO S 57 000 00 System, Drawing No 2043, sheet 22 of 28, , , Controller T 73 1 LS Wett Stde of Archibald Avenue Imgabon 430,000 OD $30,000 DO $ 30,000 00 $95,000 00 g4s 000 DD S 45 000 00 System, Drawing No 2093, sheet 22 of 28, , , Cpntroller'H' 74 1 LS East Ada pf Archibald Avenue Imlgabpn $30,000 00 530,000 00 5 30,000 00 590 000 00 590 00000 S 40 000 00 System, Drawinq No 2117, sheet 27 of 35, , , , Conboile•'H' 75 1 S Both Suite of Ramona Avenue Imgabon 435,000 00 535,000 W 5 35,000 00 572 000 W 472 000 W f 72 00000 System, D2WIOg No 2117, sheet 27 of 35, , , , Controller G I 76 1 S Both Sipes of hemwsa Avenue Imgabon 435,000 00 535,000 00 5 35,000 00 576 000 00 576 00000 ; 76 000 00 System, Drewmq No 2117, sheet 2B of 35, , , , Controller'F 77 1 LS West Sitle of Haven avenue Imgabon System, 525,000 DO S?5,000 W g 25,000 00 $63,000 00 563 000 00 f 63 000 00 Dawmg No 2117, thee[ 28 of 35, Cnn[roller'A' , , 78 79 807 2 808 EA EA 1 Gal Groundtnver Plants 5 Gal Shrub antl Vi Sfi 00 4892 00 4892 00 4B 50 S6 A59 50 S 6 8s9 50 80 73 EA 1 nes 24" Box Trees 520 001 556 160 00 s6 160 00 523 00 569 584 W 69 584 00 81 1 I LS 19 0.Da Malntenan~ Peno0 3350 00 525 550 DO 25 550 DD 3290 DO 421 170 W f Zl 170 00 82 27 000 SF IR rver W asned Gamte Cpbblestoms 45 OOD 00 f 10 00 1 45 000 00 S 5 000 00 435 000 00 I 35 000 001 S 35 000 00 B3 136 EA 3 6' Boulders 5400 OD SZ7 000 00 a 4 270 000 00 411 2s 5303 75000 303 750 W 89 I 104 I EA 12 9" Boulders SS 900 001 f 54 900 W 5225 00 530 600 001 S 30 600 00 85 129 E4 11 8" Boulders 4200 00 420,800 001 S 20 800 00 5140 00 519 560 00 S i4 560 00 B6 I 1 I LS IT reffa: Control 5100 00 512 400 00 s 12 400 00 5310 00 513 690 001 S ! 3640 W 87 I 1 I S !S WPPP 53 500 DO I S3 500 00 I 3 500 00 Sl 500 DO 4! 500 OD S 1 500 W I 42 500 W $2 500 001 4 2 500 00 41 500 00 41 s00 001 S 1 s00 W I Adtllbve Alternate Hltl 27ota1 I 5879 903 Op I S 679 9W OD 5980 309 20 1 5 9H0 309 20 ADO V NAT ID D s d G T Ian to d I I Wor BB 1 B9 1 838 LS Mobl0zahon TON q" Demmposetl Gmnlte Troll 545 000 00 545 000 001 4 45 000 00 535 000 00 435 000 00 35 000 00 9D 13 335 LF 6" P C C Header gg0 00 7 00 5147 040 001 147 040 00 71 00 4130498 00 130 498 00 ~n~I E93 345 00 93 395 00 510 00 4133 350 00 4 133 50 00 9 ~-- ~ _~_ - - S~ - SWPPP s3 500 00 43 500 001 S 3,500 00 Sl sOD t10 ~s00 00 S 1 500 00 I I Additive Alternate aid 3 Total s1 spD DD I I s! spD Do I s i spD Do r spD Do I _ a too w I s I spD o0 I I I 5290 385 DO I I S 290 385 00 I 3301848 DD I S 301 848 00 ADDITIVE ALTERNATE BID 4 rail En Pilarters I I I I 93 I 1 'S I MobtlrzaUpn 99 B I EA IT ll E P l S! 500 00 I 41 500 001 4 1 sp0 00 I 35 OOD 00 I 45 000 00 S 5 000 00 ra n i asters 95 I O EA Ilnstall Vinevartl Inte reWe Si n S7 850 00 562 800 00 S 62 800 OD 48 500 00 568 000 001 S 68 000 DD o I AtldIUVe Alternate &tl 4 Total 1 464 300 Op S 64 300 OD 573 OOp D0 S 73,000 DD ADDITIVE ALTERNATE HID 5 Ameth 5t Trallheatl Work) S ~ 1 L - M till b 97 1 EA I Dunkin Fountam 57 500 00 $7 500 00 7 500 OD 810 000 00 410 000 00 10 000 00 98 1 I EA I Eouestrmn Drmbnp Fountain I 4fi 000 00 41 200 00 I 46 OOD 00 S 6 000 00 $5 500 DO 5 500 00 5 500 DO Si 200 001 4 1200 OD 53 500 00 I 8' 500 00 4 3 500 00 20070104 PEIET ph73 Bld Summary mod zB B/9 01/08/07 BIa SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING 2ANUARY 4 2007 @ 30 OOam P 146 Padfic Electric I Inland Em ire Trall Construc4on fmm Ameth st Rrvemde Construction Cam an Inc 4-Con En meson Inc BID I1EM # QTY I UNR I OESCRIFTION I UNIT COST BSD AMOUNT BIO AMOUNT AFTER CORRECTIONS UNIT COST BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT AFTER CORRECTIONS 99 100 101 102 103 105 105 106 107 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 072 I 192 24 1 EA EA EA EA EA SF LF TON LS I Pirn¢ Tadle IE uestrlan Hitchinc Rall Trash Rece tatle B¢vde Rack 17211 Sicnaoe wIM Piksters 14" Thirk Foe RetaNan[ Fmtsh fanrne2 I6" Wide Concrete Reeder cer Std 539 l4" Decomposed G2nt[e Area swPPP AtldlUVe Alternate Bid 5 Total I 41 500 00 fB$D 00 5850 00 s6sD aD I f 20 000 001 f7 00 410 OD 4125 00 S1 500 00 I I fi 500 00 850 00 S fB50 001 4850 00 I f 520 000 00 I f S7 504 DD I f 41 920 00 f $3 000 00 I S fl 500 00 E 552,674 00 S 1 500 DO 850 DO 850 00 850 00 20 000 W 7 504 00 1 9ID 00 3 000 00 1 500 00 52 674 DO 52100 00 41 700 00 gl 000 00 5750 00 523 000 00 I fB SD I 520 DD I 571 DO 41 ODO 00 I 1 S2 100 W 4 41 700 00 S 41 000 001 S 5750 00 523 000 001 S 59 112 001 83 840 00 f fl 705 00 41 DOD 001E 563.206 001 4 Z 100 00 1 700 00 1 000 00 750 00 23 000 00 9 112 00 3840 00 1 704 00 1 000 00 fi3 206 00 I I I I I I Total Bitl w/All Alternates Totai I 1 5 3.247894 20 I S 3 247 494 20 1 4 3 663.296 20 I S 3 563 296 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 82v0 Si n&Desi n Crown Fence Unmin Padfic Sutlnahar lot Kam LanOSce I I I 2%+- I 2%+- 20%+ less than 1% I Z2%+- I RCB 65ons Unroln PacN¢ J& E Tree Service Su nor Pavement Emno Fenre I I 6% 35% 1 iq5 45% I I I I I I I I t I I 20070104 PEIET Ph23 Bltl Summary mod zis 9/9 01/08/07 P147 STAFF REPORT ENGL\~EERING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: February 21, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From• William J O'Neil, City Engineer By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject. APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (SRA - 49), FOR TRAFFIC IGNAL INSTALLATION AT 4T" STREET AND RICHMOND PLACE, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARCEL MAP 16300, LOCATED NORTH OF 4T" STREET BETWEEN PITTSBURGH AVENUE AND RICHMOND PLACE, SUBMITTED BY THARALDSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT NUMBER 11243035650/1026124-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for the installation of a traffic signal at 4~h Street and Richmond Place, in conjunction with the development of Parcel Map 16300, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a Condition of Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 16300, Tharaldson Development Company, the Developer, was required to install a traffic signal at 4`h Street and Richmond Place Said traffic signal installation and related improvements have been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga last August 2006 Whenever a developer is required, as a condition of approval of a development permit, to construct a public facility that is determined by the City to have supplemental size, length or capaaty over what is needed for the impacts of that development, and when such construction is necessary to ensure efficient and timely construction of the facilities network, a reimbursement agreement with the developer and a credit against the Transportation Development Fee shall be offered P148 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REIb-IBURSEMENT AGREEMENT SRA-49 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 PAGE 2 The Developer has submitted an itemized accounting of the construction costs of the required signal modification The total cost of said improvements is $ 170,471 76, to be reimbursed from the City Transportation Reimbursement Account Number 11243035650/1026124-0 Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office Respectfully Subm~itt~ed~, ~- ~~~ ~~/ `i l W am J O'Neil City Engineer WJO WV diw Attachment P149 6TH STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4TH STREET ONTARIO Ia INLAND EMPIRE MISSION ONTARIO MILLS SHOPPING CENTER ONTARIO MILLS PARKWAY 10 15 e N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM• 1~ e~C ~.1 16300 TITLE: v/~T~' 1'?~°,-s ENGINEERING DIVISION P150 RESOLUTION NO D7- D~I~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION (SRA-49) AT THE INTERSECTION OF 4r" STREET AND RICHMOND PLACE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement by Tharaldson Development Company, the Developer, for off-site improvements, in conjunction with the development of Parcel Map 16300, located on the north side of 4~h Street between Pittsburgh Avenue and Richmond Place, and WHEREAS, the Developer, at Developer's expense, has completed the required traffic signal improvements NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF-THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest hereto and to cause same to record P151 S ~/" The C i t y o f a n c n o ~, u c a m o n g a StafEReport DATE February 21, 2007 TO Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT APPROVAL OF RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING DISTANCE FOR PROJECT PRJ2006-00094 (DRC2006-00223, DRC2006-00341, DRC2006-00350, DRC2007-00029, TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18179) AT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND GROVE AVENUE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Councl approve the Public Hearing Noticng Distance for Protect PRJ2006-00094 at a 2000-foot radius plus the list of concerned citizens now on file with the protect BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A mixed use protect with potential effects beyond the normal 660-foot notification radus is proposed near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue A total of 98 residential units and approximately 13,000 square feet of office space are proposed After the posting of the notification signs on the site, substantial Interest has been shown by the public, including the circulation of a petition Because of the level of public interest, a list has been compiled by the Planning Department of the signatories to the petition and of other letters received Staff requests approval to expand the notification from the regwred 660-foot Public Hearing Noticing Distance to a 2000-foot distance and to also include those interested people on the complied list Respectfu^lly^Submitted, James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT VP/bt STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY $ERVIC~.S DEPAR'I'1vIENT Date: February 21, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGwre-Emery, Senior Park Planner RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of recreation facility issues, programs, protects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, protects and programs occurring in the Community Services Department This report is provided to the City Council for informational purposes only No action need be taken on this item A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Rancho Summit Park: Contractor is working on hardscape installation, and has installed the ballfield backstops as well as the basketball court Irrigation installation is continuing Red Hill Park: • The tot lot design for the north end of the park is in plan check Pacific Electric Trail: Phase 1 (Haven to east of Etiwanda) -Construction is well underway Sully Miller is working on the rough grading and is doing the bridge work at Day Creek Channel Phases 2 and 3 (Amethyst to Haven) -This portion of the protect is proceeding to Council on February 21 for contract award • Phase 5 (East of Etiwanda to the eastern City Limits) -This portion of the protect is lust starting design • Phase 4 (Grove to Amethyst) -Still trying to get funding - no design yet P152 B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE P153 PARKS, RECREATIONFAC[LITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PAGE 2 FESxuARY21,2007 Seniors: • The table below summarizes senior activities that take took place during January 2007 as well as the total number of registrations for the year for Wellness Pass Activit Date Part~ci ants Thanks awn Dinner November 19, 2006 300 3-D Art Class Janua 11 7 Senior Aerobics Janua 2 class sessions 74 Personal Trainer Janua 3 13 Scul tin Janua 3 class sessions 17 Palates Janua 2 class sessions 42 Wellness Pass - A es 60+ Total Re ~stered 473 Wellness Pass-A es 50-59 Total Re istered 136 • Upcoming senior acUvdies are summarized below Activit Date Time Senior Adviso Committee Februa 26, 2007 9 00 a m Pool Tournament March 2, 2007 1 00 m Senior Center Volunteer Reco nation March 9, 2007 1 30 p m St Patrick's Da Event March 15, 2007 9 30 - 10 30 a m Bi Band Dance March 18, 2007 2 00 - 5 00 m Human Services: • The free State and Federal Income Tax Preparation services sponsored by AARP began on February 1 s` at the James L Brulte Senior Center and will continue through April 14`h This program is open to participants of all ages who have low to moderate incomes The service is available Tuesday and Saturday from 9 00 a m until 1 30 p m and every Thursday from 2 00 p m until 5 30 p m on a first-come, first-served basis Trips and Tours: The table below summarizes participation in trips and tours activities during the reporting period Trip Date Number Partici ants Fiddler on the Roof Janua 24 43 sold out Ronald Reagan Presidential February 20th 40 (sold out) Libra and Museum • Upcoming trips and tour activities are summarized below Tri Date Cost Kodak Theatre March 5 $70 00 er erson Griffith Park Observato March 14 $35 00 er erson San Die o & Coronado March 16 $55 00 er erson P154 PARKS, RECREATION FAC[LITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PAGE 3 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 Volunteers: • The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usaoe for the month of December 2006 and fiscal year to date December 2006 Jul -December 2006 Division # of Volunteers # of Hours ' $ Value # of Volunteers # of Hours *$ Value Administration 5 15 $296 30 90 $1,776 Senior Services 153 1,727 $334,091 944 9,335 $184,267 Human Services 29 96 $1,895 199 647 $10,878 S orts 160 762 $15,042 624 4,661 $92,008 Speaal Events - -- $0 382 752 $14,840 Performin Arts 86 751 $14,825 494 3,915 $77,262 Teens 72 526 $10,383 389 4,457 $87,966 Youth Pro rams 19 135 $2,665 53 677 $13,364 Totals 524 4,012 $79,197 3,115 24,534 $482,361 -tlaSBO on 21J ivmour-scare average as aerermrneo me r,anrorma uiuepenuem anaur Special Needs Programs: • The table on the following page highlights special needs activities that have taken place during the month of January Actrvit Start Date Partici ants Star Performers Janua 10 22 Karate Janua 9 5 • Upcomino special needs activities are summarized below Activit Date Time Frame St Padd 's Da BINGO March 16th 5 30 m - 7 30 m Karaoke Sin -Alon Aril 6 5 30 m - 7 30 m Youth. • The table below summaries youth program attendance for the month of December Program Classes/Sites Registrants/Attendance Pla school 63/4 1,013/20,134 Lewis Partnership Kids Club @ Evergreen, Del Mar, Terra Vista 4 sites 103 & Carmel A artments • Mobile Recreation "Fun on the Run" Total attendance for Mobile Recreation for the month of January was 283 The chart on the following page provides the schedule for Mobile Recreation for the winter season P155 PARKS, RECREATIONFAC[LITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PAGE 4 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 Da of the Week Park Location Time Frame Monda Bear Gulch 2 30 until 5 00 m Tuesda Hermosa 2 30 until 5 00 m Wednesda Old Town 2 30 until 5 00 m Thursda Ellena 2 30 until 5 00 m Freda Windrows 2 30 until 5 00 m Teens. • The table below summarizes teen program attendance for the month of January 2007 Pro ram/Activit Attendance /Partite ation Teen Center 636 artici ants/85 hours S ruce Skate Faalit 799 artici ants/558 s ectators TRAC -Special Projects/Snack Bars/Meetin s 39 volunteers/ 46 hours TRAC - Babysitting 68 participants/19 volunteers/114 5 hours of service Teen Connection 28 volunteens/70 volunteer hours Youth Sports. • The table on the following page summarizes youth snorts activities for the reporting period Activit # Participants A e/Gender # Teams Pee Wee Basketball 288 3-5/bo s & irls 24 Youth Winter Cam 45 5-12/bo s & irls N/A Youth Basketball 803 8-16/bo s & irls 98 Cucamonga Middle School - Judo 80 8-adult N/A Northtown O en Pla 25 6-13/bo s & iris N/A RC Family Sports Center: • The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the Center for the reporting penod Activit # Partin ants Adult Basketball 473 Youth Basketball 1,526 Adult Rac uetball 388 Youth Rac uetball 62 Adult Volle ball 13 Youth Volle ball 77 Jazzercise 875 Adult Sports: • The table on the following page summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period P156 PARKS, RECREATIONFAC[LITIES AND COivIMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PACE 5 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 Activit # Partici ants # Team Gender Softball 2,720 170 Males/Females Tennis 8 N/A Males/Females Rac uetball 13 N/A Males/Females Basketball Full Court 320 12 Males Basketball 3-on-3 128 10 Males • There were three (3) adult softball tournaments during the month of January at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Park • The Sports Advisory Committee will not meet during the month of February, their next meeting will be in April Special Events: • The table below outlines the Department's special events and Cultural Center performances for the 2007 calendar year Date Event Time Location Janua 11 'The Manhattan Transfer" Performance 8 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 13 "Sin -A-Lon Sound of Music" Performance 1 00 m/7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 14 "Eddie Carroll as Jack Benny - Lau hter in Bloom" Performances 2 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 27 'The Pekin Acrobats" Performance 2 00 m/7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 30 Teen -Career Ni ht - Com uter Industr 6 30 m/9 30 m Gold S Lewis Communit Center Februa 2 "Od sse Dance Theatre" Performance 8 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 8 Seniors - Valentine's Da Event 9 30am-10 30am James L Brulte Senior Center 8 "Side by Side by Sondheim" - Communit Theater Performance 7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 9 "Side by Side by Sondheim" - Communit Theater Performance 7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 10 "Side by Side by Sondheim" - Communit Theater Performance 7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 10 Teen Dance -Kin & Queen Valentine Ball 7 m - 10 m Gold S Lewis Communit Center P157 PARKS, REQiEATIONFAQLITIES AND COMMUNITYSERVICESDPDATE PAGE 6 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 Date Event Time Location February -Continued 10 "Side by Side by Sondheim" - Communal Theater Performance 2 00 m/7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 11 "Side by Side by Sondheim" - Communal Theater Performance 2 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 17 Ja anese Mini Fest 3 00 m - 6 30 m Bank of America Courtyard - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 17 "TAIKOPROJECT re eneration" Performance 8 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 21 "Peter & the Wolf' Performance 10 OOam Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 24 "The Ele hant's Child" Performance 2 00 m/7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 27 Teen -Career Ni ht -Construction Indust 7 00 m-8 30 m Gold S Lewis Communal Center March 9 Senior Volunteer Reco nation Luncheon 1 30 m-3 00 m James L Brulte Senior Center 9 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 10 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 2 00 m/7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 11 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 2 00 m/4 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 15 Seniors - St Patrick's Da Event 9 30am-10 30am James L Brulte Senior Center 15 Teens -Career Ex o 6 30 m-8 30 m Gold S Lewis Communal Center 16 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 17 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 2 00 m/7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 18 S ran Senior Dance 2 00 m-5 00 m James L Brulte Senior Center 18 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 2 00 m/4 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 23 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 24 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 2 00 m/7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 25 "Charlotte's Web" Performance 2 00 m/4 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 29 "Breaks The Urban Funk Spectacular" Performance 8 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 30 "Breaks The Urban Funk Spectacular" Performance 8 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 31 "The S encers Theatre of Illusion" 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 31 Teen -Dance-a-thon 7 00 m - 12am Gold S Lewis Communal Center P158 PARKS, RECREATION FAC[LITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PAGE 7 FEBRUARY21,2007 Date Event Time Location A rd 1 "The S encers Theater of Illusion" 2 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 3 Teen -Career Ni ht -Public Services 6 30 m-9 30 m Gold S Lewis Communit Center 5 Seniors S rin Flin Event 9 30 m - 10 30 m James L Brulte Senior Center 7 Youth Track 8 Field Meet 7 30am Los Osos Hi h School 12 "A Midni ht C "Performance 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 13 "A Midni ht C "Performance 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 17 Blue Grass Mini - Fest 3 30 m/6 30 m Bank of America Courtyard - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 19 Lewis Family Playhouse - Season Announcement Event TBA Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 27 Wellness Fair 4 00 m - 8 00 m Central Park 27 "Big River" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 28 S ecial Needs - IncredAbles Festival of Arts 9 30am - 3 00 m Gold S Lewis Communit Center 28 "Big River" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 29 "Big River" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 2 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Ma 4 "Big River" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 5 "Big River" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 6 "Big River" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 2 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 11 Mother's Da Tea 3 00 m-5 00 m James L Brulte Senior Center 11 "Four Stand-U Dads" Performance 7 30 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 12 "Four Stand-Up Dads" Performance 2 OOpm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 17 TRAC Awards 7 00 m Park & Recreation Commission Meetin 18 Special Needs Prom TBA Goldy S Lewis Community Center 19 That's Show Biz Kids Arts 8 Crafts Mini - Fest 2 30pm - 6 30pm Bank of America Courtyard - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 22 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 24 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 26 "Dino Rock" 2 OOpm/ 7 OOpm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 29 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 31 Playschool Graduation 6 OOpm-8 OOpm Los Osos High School 31 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square P159 PARKS, RECREATIONFAC[LITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PAGE 8 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 Date Event Time Location June 2 Teen Dance- Summer Fling 7 OOpm-10 OOpm Gold S Lewis Communal Service 2 "Smothers Brothers" Performance 8 OOpm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 5 Movies in Town S uare Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 7 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 9 'Tomas Kubinek" Performance 2 OOpm/7 OOpm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 10 Senior Event -Dinner and Auction 4 OOpm - 8 OOpm James L Brulte Senior Center 12 Volunteer Reco nation TBA TBA 12 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town S uare 14 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 15 Seniors -Father's Day BBQ 5 OOpm/7 OOpm James L Brulte Senior Center 19 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 21 Movies in Town Square Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 22 "The Foreigner" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 OOpm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 23 'The Foreigner" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 OOpm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 24 "The Foreigner" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 2 OOpm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 28 Seniors -Independence Day Event 9 30am - 10 30am James L Brulte Senior Center 29 "The Foreigner" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 30pm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 30 'The Foreigner" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 30pm Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Jul 1 'The Foreigner" Performance - Communal Theater Performance 2 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 4 4th of Jul TBA E icenter 9 Movies in the Park Dusk Central Park 10 Movies in the Park Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 11 Movies in the Park Dusk Windrows Park 12 Concerts in the Park 7 OOpm Red Hill Park 13 Movies in the Park Dusk Red Hill Park 13 Jazz Mini - Fest 6 30 m - 9 30 m Bank of America Courtyard - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 16 Movies in the Park Dusk Central Park 17 Seniors -Ice Cream Soaal 1 30pm - 3 OOpm James L Brulte Senior Center 17 Movies in the Park Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 18 Movies in the Park Dusk Windrows Park 19 Concerts in the Park 7 OOpm Red Hill Park 20 Movies in the Park Dusk Red Hill Park 23 Movies in the Park Dusk Central Park 24 Movies in the Park Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 26 Movies in the Park Dusk Windrows Park P160 PARKS, RECREATIONFAC[LITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PAGE 9 FEBRUARY21,2007 Date Event Time Location July -Continued 26 Concerts in the Park 7 OOpm Red Hill Park 27 Movies in the Park Dusk Red Hill Park 27 "The Wizard of Oz" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 28 'The Wizard of Oz" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 29 "The Wizard of Oz" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 2 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 30 Movies in the Park Dusk Central Park 31 Movies in the Park Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square Au ust 1 Movies in the Park Dusk Windrows Park 2 Concerts in the Park 7 OOpm Red Hill Park 3 Movies in the Park Dusk Red Hill Park 3 "The Wizard of Oz" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 4 "The W izard of Oz" Performance - Communit Theater Performance 2 00 m/7 00 m Lewis Family Playhouse - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 6 Movies in the Park Dusk Central Park 7 Movies in the Park Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 8 Movies in the Park Dusk Windrows Park 9 Concerts in the Park 7 OOpm Red Hill Park 10 Movies in the Park Dusk Red Hill Park 13 Movies in the Park Dusk Central Park 14 Movies in the Park Dusk Victoria Gardens Town Square 15 Movies in the Park Dusk Windrows Park 16 Concerts in the Park 7 OOpm Red Hill Park 17 Movies in the Park Dusk Red Hill Park 17 Celtic Mini - Fest 6 30 m - 9 30 m Bank of America Courtyard - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 23 Seniors -Luau Event 9 30am - 10 30am James L Brulte Senior Center Se tember 7 Seniors -Grand arent's Da 5 00 m - 7 00 m James L Brulte Senior Center 14 Lewis Famil Pla house - Season O en TBA Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 16 Seniors Prom 5 00 m - 10 00 m James L Brulte Senior Center October 11 Teens - Colle e Fair 7 00 m - 10 00 m Gold S Lewis Communit Center 19 Seniors - Oktoberfest 6 00 m-TBA James L Brulte Senior Center 25 Seniors - Spooktakular Event 9 30am - 10 30am James L Brulte Senior Center 27 Youth -Pumpkin Carving 9 30am & 11 OOam Red Hill Park 27 Teen Dance -Monster Bash 7 OOpm - 10 OOpm Gold S Lewis Communit Center P161 PARKS, RECREATIONFAQLITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PACE 10 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 Date Event Time Location November 10 Founder's Da Parade 9 30am Victoria Gardens 12 Seniors -Veterans' Day Event 11 OOam - 2 OOpm James L Brulte Senior Center 16 Seniors -Thanks ivin Dinner Event 5 00 m - 7 00 m James L Brulte Senior Center TBA Flu Shot Clinic TBA Central Park December 1 Youth- Breakfast with Santa 8 30/9 30/10 30am Goldy S Lewis Community Center 15 Teen Dance 7 OOpm - 10 OOpm Goldy S Lewis Community Center 18 Seniors -Holiday Party 9 30am - 11 OOam James L Brulte Senior Center g1 Seniors New Year's Eve Dance 11 OOam - 3 00 m Central Park TBA = To Be Announced Cultural and Performing Arts: • The table below summarizes Theatre Arts Academy classes during the reporting period Activit Partici ants/Attendance First Ste s 75 Youth Theatre Worksho 66 Sin in for a Lifetime 39 Broadwa Babies 57 Masterin Monolo ues 33 Sin Out Loud a es 13+ 24 Sin Out Loud a es 7-12 36 Teen Actors Bootcam 120 Adult Im rove 32 Youth Theatre Worksho 66 Musical Theatre 75 Total 623 • Community Theatre rehearsals/performances included the following during the month of January 2007 Activit Partici ants/Attendance Side-b -Side Rehearsals 198 S otli ht on RC Rehearsals 75 Rental Activities: The table on the following page summarizes rental activities in Celebration Hall at the Cultural Center for the reporting period Event Date Attendance Rece tion Janua 6, 2007 100 Birthda Part Janua 12, 2007 150 P162 PARKS, RECREATIONFACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE FEBRUARY 21, 2007 PAGE 11 Event Date Attendance Cit Mana er's Meetin Janua 13, 2007 25 Birthda Part Janua 14, 2007 110 Business Meetin Janua 17, 2007 10 Lewis Family Playhouse: During the month of January, the Lewis Family Playhouse was host to a wide variety of productions, community programs and private rentals The table below summarizes this information for the reporting period Lewis FamO Pla house Professional) Presented Productions Show Date Total Attendance Number of Events Manhattan Transfer Janua 11 464 1 Sin -A-Lon Sound of Music Janua 13 784 2 Lau hter in Bloom Janua 14 431 1 The Prospector (School Performance January 25 1,054 2 The Pros ector Public Performance Janua 26 286 1 Pekin Acrobats Janua 27 1,105 2 Lewis Famil Pla house Communit Pro rams Show Date Total Attendance Number of Events S otli ht on RC Janua 20 431 1 Lewis Famil Pla house Rental Events Show Date Total Attendance Number of Events Michael R an - G s Passion Janua 6 510 1 World Financial Grou Janua 20 487 1 Recreation Contract Classes• Classes in our winter session began on January 6'" and will continue through March 23" Facdrties• • The table below and on the following page illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our community facilities during the month of January Facility Rentals # Rentals/Bookings Rental Attendance Building Attendance Lions Center East 19/31 1,100 5,990 Lions Center West 47/132 1,904 2,738 James L Brulte Senior Center 69/209 3,545 17,136 P163 PARKS, RECREATION FAC[LITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PAGE 12 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 Faality Rentals # Rentals/Bookings Rental Attendance Building Attendance Gold S Lewis Communit Center 88/155 9,225 9,732 RC Teen Center 1 24 N/A Staff continues to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center (Our local nding groups Include Alta Loma Rlding Club, Rancho Rebels 4-H, Rlsing Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga Cltlzen Mounted Patrol) to address maintenance needs and programming Currently the Department is finalizing the 2007 facility use calendar The next user group meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 21 s' Parks: The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and speaal use facilities for the month of January 2006 Park/Shelter Attendance # Rentals Red Hill 325 8 Herita a 110 3 Milliken 0 0 Hermosa 50 2 Co ote Can on 0 0 Ciwc Center Court and 0 0 Am hitheatre 0 0 TOTAL 485 13 Equestrian"* Participants 459 S ectators 50 4 'Equestrian part~c~pants include drop-~n use • Park monitors keep daily reports of activties in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance Epicenter Rentals/Actrvlties: • The following rental activties took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period A licant Event Location Date An els/Quakes Youth Baseball Clinic E icenter Stadum Janua 20, 2007 Staff is working with the following applicants for upcoming rentals and activities at the Epicenter A licant Event Location Pro osed Date Okoye Foundation 5K/10K Walk/Run Parking Lot A & City Streets February 24, 2007 Okoye Foundation Youth Sports Cimlc Epicenter Soccer & Baseball Fields April 1, 2007 Quakes Scouts Slee Over E icenter Soccer Field Aril 21, 2007 Halo Baseball Tournament E icenter Stadium Aril 27-29, 2007 Quakes Scouts Slee Over Epicenter Soccer Fields Ma 19, 2007 P164 PARKS, RECREATIONFACILITIES AND COIvIMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PAGE 13 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 A licant Event Location Pro osed Date RC Police De artment Bike Rodeo S ecial Event Lot Ma 19, 2007 Inland Valley Daily Inland Valley High Epicenter Stadium June 4-7, 2007 (2 days Bulletin Schools All Star within this time frame) Practice & Game Rancho Cucamonga Graduation Ceremony Epicenter Stadium June 13, 2007 Hi h School Pacific Coast Baseball All Star Games Epicenter Stadwm June 24, 2007 Lea ue Community Services July 4 Celebration & Epicenter Stadium July 4, 2007 De artment Fireworks Show Pon Baseball Palomino World Series E icenter Stadwm Au ust 2-5, 2007 Pacific Coast Baseball Championship Games Epicenter Stadwm August 26, 2007 Lea ue Lymphoma & Light the Night Walk Epicenter Stadium August 29, 2007 Leukemia Societ Preferred Businesses Home & Garden Show Special Event Lot October 1-8, 2007 of Amenca Park and Recreation Commission: • The Park and Recreation Commission met on February 15, 2007 At this meeting the following items were discussed/acted upon - Update on Senior Advisory Committee - Update on Sports Advisory Committee - Review and Discussion of Potential Park Protect Summary Analysis - Review and Discussion of Fund 20 and Budget Recommendations - Annual Review of Trail Priorities - Update on Napa Street Property - Update on Rails to Trails Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: • The Community Foundation continues to work with the Library Foundation on the Promoting Arts and Literacy (PALL Campaign to secure significant donors for the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center • The Foundation's next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 21, 2007, at 5 00 p m at the Civic Center At this meeting the following items were discussed and/or acted upon - Discussion Regarding the 2007 Meeting Schedule for the Board of Directors, Executive Committee and Subcommittee Meetings - Update on Subcommittee Membership - Update on Current Solicitation Efforts for the PAL Campaign - Review of Financial Report for the PAL Campaign - Revew of Proposed Schedule for Future Gala and Telethon Fundraisers P165 PARKS, RECREATION FAC[LITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE PACE 14 FEBRUARY 21, 2007 submitted, Kevin M~Ardle Community Services Director ~~ oe O'Neil City Engineer 1 ICOMMSERVICouncrl&BOardslCrtyCouncrllStaffReports12007iParks RecFac CSD Update 2 21 07 doc P166 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTDIENT RANCHO Date February 21, 2007 C,UCAMONGA To. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From William J O'Neil, City Engineer '''~~~,,/// By: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer Subject RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND N0558981P IN THE AMOUNT OF $109,77151, FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO OS-059 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Counal authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No N0558981 P in the amount of $109,771 51 for the Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, Contract No 05-059 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street and storm drain improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship Contractor H & H General Contractors, Inc P O Box 90208 San Bernardino, CA 92427-1208 Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ William J O'Neil City Engineer WJO CH Is Attachments P167 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN AND PAVEMENT REHABILATION (FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE) ~~ -..- - }- -~ -, ~ 1 HILLSI E ~u~ I / ~ IInII ILSO AVE ~ 24TH ST BANY ST f-~ < ~ SUMMR A ~~ EMO ~ ^ AV ~ a ~ .Q 30 ^ HIGHLAN VE ^ 19TH Q ^ 30 ~ z a \ < N ^^^^ ~ VICTORIA PARK I~.rv, v BASE 11nnI,,n,J~,, INE ~ R IL,I1 w ^^~~Y ST ~ ~~'SJ~U~ } I m a Vo ,h FObTHILL BLV ~~ 66 w ~~ ^ ~ ~ w . ul~,~ ~ a w • 10500 C C NfE DR ~~ a > > > > > RROW R > > a z ¢ z w ~ ~ a ~ < 4z o > < I BNSF RR ~ f7 ,~iii~~i i~i~~~~~.~r>r m r uu1J NHH 6TH ST ST I SITE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP N _~~ r _ ,~ {;kiS t TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Pulcinella, Animal Care and Services Director Marcia Godwin, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AMENDING ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES FEES AND PROVIDING FEE FLEXIBILITY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolutions, (1) amending animal care and services fees, and (2) providing discretion to the Animal Care and Services Director to offer promotional fees BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS On May 3, 2006, fees were adopted for the new Animal Care and Services Department The fees were based upon the San Bernardino County's fee schedule, which had been previously adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga when the County provided services After several months of City operation, some adjustments to the fee schedule are recommended These adjustments are practical steps to provide more effective operations and are consistent with the City's No-Kill goal Amore formal fee study is recommended to be conducted during Fiscal Year 2007/08, after tracking costs and service levels for a longer period of time The future study will examine the full range of fees and the degree to which fees should recover costs for different types of services while also providing incentives for animal adoptions and responsible pet care The Fee Resolution has been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office Staff has determined, and recommends that the City Council find, that none of the proposed fees set forth in Exhibit A to the proposed Resolution, entitled "Rews~ons and Additions to Animal Care and Services Department Fees Established By Resolution 06-142, Exh~brt A'; exceed the estimated, reasonable cost to the City in providing the services for which each fee applies P168 Following is a summary of the major changes recommended for approval at this time PAGE 2 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AMENDING ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES FEES AND PROVIDING FEE FLEXIBILITY Doa License Fees The City has had three different rates for license fees for dogs that have been spayed or neutered $15 per year for up to 23 months, $12 60 per year for 24-35 months, and $12 00 per year for 36 or more months It is recommended that the last category be eliminated, since licenses can not be renewed for more than 36 months, which is the maximum time that a rabies vaccination is valid The $12 60 per year rate will apply to licenses from 24 to 36 months We are also proposing to exempt gwde dogs and search and rescue dogs from licensing fees, with appropriate documentation This type of exemption is offered by many animal care organizations, since these dogs provide services that enhance public health and safety Owner Release/Turn-In Fees These fees would be reduced from a uniform $50 fee to $40 fee for a dog and $30 for a cat The Animal Care and Adoption Center is continuing to experience inadents of owners dropping off animals unattended without providing medical or identification information The lower fees will provide more of an incentive for owners to turn in pets in a safe and responsible manner Lowenng fees will hopefully help to minimize the number of stray animals that are picked up Adoption Fees The total adoption fees for each type of animal will be listed in the current fee schedule that is provided to the public, to avoid confusion about the different fee components (adoption processing, vaccinations, medical services, spay/neuter, and microchipping) that add up to the total adoption charge New adoption fees for additional types of animals are included in the proposed fee resolution, including birds, small reptiles, iguanas, hamsters, and guinea pigs The adoption fee for rabbits has also been clarified The adoption fees for cats would be reduced from $46 to $45 and for kittens from $61 to $60 The fees have been rounded off, to make it simpler to promote these adoptions The adoption fees for dogs would be increased from $91 to $100 and for puppies from $81 to $120 The new fees provide for partial recovery of vaccination and medical services costs Puppies require additional vaccinations compared to adult dogs These rates are very competitive with other facilities and well below private adoption rates These new fees are not expected to affect adoption rates, as puppies are in high demand However, if there is an unexpected effect on adoption rates, a temporary fee reduction or promotion fee could be implemented, if the resolution on fee flexibility is also adopted, as discussed later in this report The gwdelines for the "Senior for Senior" adoptions would be modified The age has been lowered to 60 and adoption fees would be waived for animals six years of age and older Adoption fees would not be charged to qualified animal rescue groups, formalizing the policy that has been in effect since the City assumed responsibility for Center operations P169 PAGE 3 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS AMENDING ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES FEES AND PROVIDING FEE FLEXIBILITY • Adoption fees would not be charged for an adoption of an aged animal or one recovering from serious illness or mlury Prospective pet owners who adopt these animals assume responsibility for any medical care, so the City saves costs by adopting out these pets as soon as possible These pets are also harder to place and benefit from in-home care Miscellaneous Fee Changes The fee resolution includes a new $5 fee for optional purchase of personalized identification tags and adds a $10 vaccination fee, in case of any vaccnations are directly provided by the Animal Care and Services Department The vaccnation fee would include vaccinations such as Bordatella, Distemper, and Feline Leukemia The current $6 rabies vaccnation fee would remain in effect Discretion to Offer Promotional Fees In addition to the resolution amending fees, a second resolution is proposed to provide discretion to the Animal Care and Services Director to offer Tower fees on an interim basis, such as for special events and adoption promotions This discretion will allow the Animal Care and Services Department to offer periodically offer programs like the successful two-for-one kitten/cat promotion that was offered this past summer and fall This second resolution was prepared by the City Attorney's Office CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council hold a Public Hearing, and adopt the attached Resolution No 07-047 adding and revising fees for animal care and services It is also recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No 07-048 authorizing the City's Animal Care and Services Director to temporarily Icwer certain fees applicable to the care and disposition of animals within the City The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public hearing at which oral or written presentations may be made Notice of the time and place of the hearing for consideration of this matter has been properly provided, no valid request for mailed notice is on file with the City, and copies of the data upon which the new and revised fees are based were made available to the public All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred Respectful) submitted, Joe Pulcinella Animal Care and Services Director Marcia Godwin, Ph D Assistant to the City Manager Attachments -Proposed Resolutions - Exhibit A Amendment to City of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Services Department Fees P170 P171 RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ 7 / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 06-142, AND ADDING AND REVISING CERTAIN ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES FEES. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore adopted regulations governing the caze, adoption, maintenance, control, and disposition of animals within the City Satd regulations provide that fees for the provision of services specified therein shall be as established by resolution of the City Council (u) On February 21, 2007, the City Council conducted a public heanng, noticed as required by law, to consider amending Exhibit A to Resolution No 06-142, to adopt new fees and revise existing fees for certain animal-related services established by said Resolution (ui) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby finds and resolves as follows 1 The facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Exhibit A to Crty Council Resolution No 06-142 is hereby amended by revising existing fees and adding new fees, as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and applicable to the provision of animal-related services specified m Title 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 3 The Crty Council has heretofore determined, and based thereon Finds, that none of the specific fees set forth m Exhibit A hereto, exceed the estimated, reasonable cost to the Crty m providing the services for which each fee applies 4 The City Clerk shall cernfy to the adoption of this Resolution PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2007 Mayor RC-resolution-animal control fees P172 I, Debra J Adams, City Clerk of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cemfy that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of 2007, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2007 ATTEST City Clerk of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga RC-resolution-animal control fees P173 EXHIBIT A REVISIONS AND ADDITIONS TO ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT FEES ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION 06-142. EXHIBIT A All fees are applicable immediately aker adoption Onl than ed fees and new fees are listed SERVICES FEE ANIMAL LICENSING: DOG LICENSE FEES (CALENDAR YEAR) Spayed/neutered fee (24-36 $12 60/year months Spayed/neutered fee (36 or Eliminated more months Delinquent fee (waived at $18 00/year licensing clinic) does not include animal fee Guide Dog for No Fee Blind/Disabled, Search/ Rescue Dog, with documentation and s a ed/neutered ANIMAL LICENSING TAGS Personalized Identification $5 00 Ta ANIMAL SHELTERING Owner turned In dog, other $40 00 animal -with ado tion hold Owner turned In cat -with $30 00 ado tion hold ANIMAL SHELTERING: TOTAL ADOPTION FEE INCLUDES ADOPTION PROCESSING, VACCINATION, SPAY/NEUTER, AND MICROCHIP DOG LICENSE IS EXTRA AND DUE AT TIME OF ADOPTION Do $100 00 Cat $45 00 Pu ,under 4 months $120 00 Kitten, under 4 months, $60 00 includes $40 deposit for s a /neuter Rabbit $40 00 65 or older, 1 exempt per Eliminated ear "Seniors for Seniors" Exempt, one (1) per year Persons 60 or older adopting cat or dog that is least six ears of a e RC-resolution-animal control fees P174 Pets that are aged or Exempt, one (1) per year recovering from serious illness or in u Pets placed with animal Exempt rescue rou s Guinea i s $20 00 Hamsters $5 00 Small birds (parakeets, $10 00 finches Medwm birds cockatiels $20 00 Large birds (macaws/African $100 00 re s I uanas $30 00 Small re tiles $10 00 VETERINARY SERVICES Other vacanations (only if $10 00 provided by City, vacanation clinics hosted by other providers may charge different rates RC-resolution-animal control fees P175 RESOLUTION NO. O7-o y S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S ANIMAL CARE AND SERVICES DIRECTOR TO TEMPORARILY LOWER CERTAIN FEES APPLICABLE TO THE CARE AND DISPOSITION OF ANIMALS WITHIN THE CITY. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore adopted fees relating to the caze, adoption, maintenance, control and disposition of animals within the City (n) It is the City Council's intent in adopting this Resolution to authonze the City's Director of Animal Care and Services to temporanly lower certain fees related to animal services including, but not limited to, fees pertaining to adoptions, spaying and neutenng, and vaccinations, that maybe provided at special or promotional City events (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby finds and resolves as follows The facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Notwithstanding the existence of any fee established by the City Council pertaining to animal services, the City Council hereby authonzes the Director of Animal Care and Services for the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, upon consent of the City Manager, to temporanly reduce or suspend fees for specified animal services provided by the City at special or promotional Crty-sponsored events Any such fee reduction or suspension shall be m effect for no longer than the duration of such special or promotional event The services for which applicable fees maybe temporanly reduced or suspended by the Director of Animal Care and Services, as provided above, are as follows A Animal adoption, B Spay and neuter, C Animal vaccinations, D Dog licenses, E Microchtppmg, F Identification tags 11231-0001\935983v1 doc P176 Except as revised herein, nothing m this Resolution shall otherwise affect any existing fee pertaining to animal related services provided by the City The Crty Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2007 Mayor I, Debra J Adams, Clty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certlfy that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Crty Council held on the day of , 2007, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting of the Crty Council of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2007 AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAINED ATTEST Crty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 11231-0001\9359S3vl doc P177 -~ c 5 ~-,^ >~i ( - T H E C I T Y O F Rn~cno CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE• February 21, 2007 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE DRC2006-00916 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS -Review of proposed Housing Incentive Agreement to implement Development Review DRC2005-01060 by modifying certain development standards for the construction of 40 workforce apartment units on vacant property in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue - APN 0207-254-67 and 68 Related files Development Review DRC2005-01060 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission and staff recommend adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement DRC2006-00916 to implement the East Rancho Verde Village DRC2006-00916 protect of affordable family apartment units BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Southern California Housing Corporation is requesting approval of an Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement (hereafter the Agreement) pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65915 to 65918 and Development Code Chapter 17 40 The purpose for the Agreement is to make the protect economically feasible and thereby facilitate the construction of 40 new affordable apartment units and related improvements on 1 75 acre of land adtacent to the east side of the Rancho Verde Village apartment complex located at 8837 Grove Avenue The proposed Agreement is associated with Design Development Review DRC2005-01060, as referenced in the attached report prepared for the Planning Commission The proposed Agreement identifies the specific areas where the applicant is requesting that the standard development standards of the underlying Medium-High Residential zoning district be modified for the protect The section of the Agreement entitled Operative Provisions identifies the specific development standards to be amended The list of changes includes a reduction in the required minimum lot size for the development at the density requested, relief on required P178 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00916 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS February 21, 2007 Page 2 setbacks from adtacent single-family properties, modified interior building setback/separation distances, reduction of visitor parking on the subtect site, and a higher perimeter wall height where needed Under State law, cities are regwred to provide development incentives for the development of affordable housing units within its turisdiction The more affordable the units, the more incentives the City must grant Typically, these incentives included extra density and/or relaxed development standards in exchange for the creation of affordable units On January 10, 2007, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the matter at which 8 persons spoke on the item Most of the speakers were from the surrounding neighborhood and were opposed to the protect citing concerns about not being notified for the neighborhood meetings, increased traffic and adequacy of fire protection, crime, and graffiti impacts in their neighborhood One neighbor spoke in favor of the project indicating he had attended both neighborhood meetings and that his family looked forward to the improvements because it would eliminate a troublesome vacant property and abandoned house from the neighborhood Staff, the applicant, and the Commission responded to the concerns raised and then moved to approve the design of the project, with a condition that the City Council approve the subject Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement necessary to implement the project A copy of the Planning Commission staff report and minutes are attached FACTS FOR FINDING The Agreement in question applies to approximately 1 75 acres of vacant property that is presently zoned Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) The purpose of the Agreement is to allow the development of 40 affordable family apartment units on the subtect site The development of said apartments will be consistent with the uses allowed by underlying zoning designation and appropriately related to the existing Rancho Verde apartment complex to which it will be attached Further, the protect will result in new public street improvements to provide a finished appearance to the respective terminal points where Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street meet the subject site The surrounding properties to the north and east are developed with modest single-family homes in the Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) district Directly south of the site is a narrow strip of land that is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 1), and is presently used as a rail line by the BNSF Railroad and Metrolink commuter trains Development of the subtect site will result in the elimination of the unsightly vacant lot and abandoned house which has been the setting for undesirable impacts to the adtacent neighborhood Staff finds the proposed Agreement to be appropriate and an effective means for implementing the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan to provide affordable housing units for all segments of the community More speafically, the Agreement modifies certain development standards for the construction of 40 workforce apartment units pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65915-65918 and Development Code Chapter 17 40 The amended development standards proposed by the Agreement will not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties in that it enables the applicant to develop the property in an orderly fashion that is consistent with underlying zoning designation Moreover, the proposed improvements associated with the project will result in a benefit to the new and existing tenants of the apartment complex P179 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00916 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS February 21, 2007 Page 3 Finally, the Agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney, and the protect overall has obtained design approval by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on October 31, 2006, and Planning Commission approval on January 10, 2007 The DRC found the project to be well designed and complementary to the appearance of the existing apartment complex ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT An Initial Study was prepared for the entire protect and released for public review on December 11, 2006 Based on the findings of the Initial Study, staff determined that the protect could have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact unless reduced to a level of less-than-significant by the implementation of mitigation measures Proposed mitigation measures have been included as conditions of approval for the protect Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the protect CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all the property owners within a 600-foot radws of the protect site to the properties to the north, south, east, and west A total of 130 notices were mailed CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving DRC2006-00916, the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement for East Rancho Verde Village to facilitate the construction of 40 new affordable apartment units and related improvements at the subtect site Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~~ Jam s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT MD\bt Attachments Exhibit A -Draft Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement for DRC2006-00916 Exhibit B -East Rancho Verde Village Protect Plans for DRC2005-01060 Exhibit C -Planning Commission Staff Report for Housing Incentive Agreement DRC2006-00916 dated January 10, 2007 Exhibit D -Planning Commission Resolution No 07-02 dated January 10, 2007 Exhibit E -Planning Commission Staff Report for Development Review DRC2005-01060 dated January 10, 2007 Exhibit F -Planning Commission Resolution No 07-01 dated January 10, 2007 Exhibit G -Planning Commission Minutes dated January 10, 2007 Exhibit H -Initial Study Parts i and II City Councl Resolution of Approval for Affordable Housing Incentive Draft Agreement DRC2006-00916 P180 HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT THIS HOUSING INCENTNE AGREEMENT is dated for identification purposes as of _ 200_, and is by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a public body, corporate and politic (the "City") and THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Owner") (City and Owner are sometimes referred to herein mdrndually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties") RECITALS A The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and Owner entered into that certain Affordable Housing Agreement dated as of June 28, 2005, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Affordable Housing Agreement dated as of March 9, 2006 (as amended, the "AHA") Among other things, the AHA provides for Agency financial assistauce to Owner to aid m acgmsition of certain real property (the "Site") descnbed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, construction of 40 tluee-bedroom apartments as well as amenities including a coinmumty center, logging paths and a hardcourt play area to serve larger families (collectively, the "Improvements") and operation of those flnprovements to provide rental housing for families of very low, low and moderate income within the City The Srte and Improvements constitute a protect commonly ]crown as East Rancho Verde Village ("East Rancho Verde Village" or "Project") Housing Incentive Agreement EXHIBIT A Tlvs dOCUment 15 exempt from the SPACE ABOVE THI5 LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE payment of a recording fee pursuant to Govt Code §27383 P181 B, Owner currently owns and operates a 248-unit affordable multifamily apartment community adtacent to and west of the Stte conunonly known as Rancho Verde Village, described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto (" Rancho Verde Village") C. The City has adopted Chapter 17 40 of the Development Code (the "Affordab]e Housing Ordinance") to tmplement Sections 65915 and 65917 of the California Government Code, to facilitate the development of affordable housing and to tmplement the goals, obtectiroes and policies of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. D Pursuant to applicable provisions of the AHA, a Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants between the Agency and the Owner (the "Regulatory Agreement") and an Operation and Maintenance Agreement between the Agency and the Owner (the "0&M Agreement") were recorded on July 22, 2005 as instrument Nos 2005-0530600 and 2005-0530601, respectively, of Official Records of San Bernardino County, Cahfomia The Regulatory Agreement restncts rental of 19 of the 40 apartment umts in the Protect to "very ]ow Income households," as defined m Section 17 40 20 A of the Affordable Housing Ordinance and an additional 13 untts for occupancy by "lower income households," as defined therein The Regulatory Agreement also restncts the rents which can be charged by Owner to quahf}nng tenants who will occupy the Project, by requiring that all apartments in the Protect shall be rented at an "affordable rent," as defined m Section 17 40 020 of the Affordable Housing Ordinance E Under paragraph 3 1 of the Regulatory Agreement, the term thereof is "in perpetuity," but m the event that a term "m perpetuit}~' should be determined to be m violation of any state or federal law, then the term of the Regulatory Agreement expires July 21, 3004 (a term of 99 years following recordation) F In order to construct all of the Improvements on the Site so that the same maybe operated to provide affordable housing to the tenants identified m the Regulatory Agreement, Owner has requested that the City grant certain mcenhves to the Protect including a reduction m Site development standards and a modification of the requirements of the City's Development Code which are applied to the review and approval of the Improvements The grant of such mcenhves is necessary to make the Protect economically feasible and to enable construction of the Protect G The unit sizes and number ofbedrooms of apartments in East Rancho Verde Village targeted for rental to very low income households and low income households as restricted m the Re latory A Bement are as follows Number of Apartments Averaee Sauare Foota eg of Apartment Number of Bedrooms Very Low Income Households 19 1084 3 Lower Income Households 13 1084 3 Housing Incentive Agreement 2 P182 Consequently, 80% of the 40 apartment units to be constructed in East Rancho Verde Village qualify as "Target Units" under the Affordable Housing Ordinance, enabling the Project to qualify for a density bonus and three incentives thereunder. Based on rts finding of the necessity therefore, by this Housing Incentive Agreement the City has approved reductions and modifications to the Development Code as applied to the Improvements, as are specified herein H Although Owner will own and operate Rancho Verde Vtllage aitd East Rancho Verde Vtllage as two separate and distinct projects, because they are contiguous Owner has also requested that certain amemhes be shared between the two communities, mcludmg ingress and egress over Rancho Verde Vtllage for residents of East Rancho Verde Vtllage, use by the residents of Rancho Verde Village of the communrtyroom artd other amemhes constructed on East Rancho Verde Village, and use by the residents of East Rancho Verde Village of certain amemhes constructed within Rancho Verde Vtllage, mcludmg guest parking spaces located on Rancho Verde Village I Ctty and Owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations and restrictions set forth m this Housing Incentive Agreement touch and concem the Site m that the Owner's legal interest m the Stte and the Protect is rendered less valuable thereby The Ctty and the Owner hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants touch and concern the Stte by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the Protect by persons and families of lower Income and very low income, who are the intended beneficiaries of such covenants, reservations and restnchons, and by furthering the public policies for which this Housing Irtcenhve Agreement is adopted Further, the parties hereby agree that such covenants, reservations and restnchons benefit all other real property located within the Ctty. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, Ctty and the Owner hereby agree as follows 1. Reduced and Modified Standards Pertamme to Development of East_Rancho Verde Village City agrees that pursuant to the application of Section 17 40 040 B of the Affordable Housing Ordinance, the following incentives may be incorporated into the final site plan and ancillary and associated plans (grading, landscaping, etc) for East Rancho Verde Village submitted by Owner to the City for development review (a) Location of butldmgs of various heights shall be subject to approval during the Development Review process, but, notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, three-story aparhnent butldmgs shall be allowed to be located a nununum of 53 feet from the east and north property bnes of East Rancho Verde Vtllage, measured to the face of the closest patio/balcony of such bmldmg Housing Incentive Agreement P183 (b) Gat ages, carports, trash enclosures and other improvements which might be constructed as a part of the East Rancho Verde Village project shall be pernutted to be constructed with a zero setback from the north, east and south property fines of the East Rancho Verde Vtllage property, subject to approval of final location dunng the Development Review process (c) Height, matenals and design of the penmeter wall proposed for the south, east and portions of the north property line of East Rancho Verde Vtllage shall be subject to review and approval dunng the Development Revtew process, but, notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the hetght of the penmeter walls located on the south and east property litres maybe up to, but may not exceed, a tnaxttnum of I 1 feet, measured from the fimshed grade at the mtenor side of the wall, which forms a part of the garage buildings located on the property fines, and the hetght of the penmeter wall at the north property fine may be up to, but may not exceed, a maxtmutn of 8 feet high, measured from fimshed grade at the intenor side of the wall (d) The Ctty agrees that the following items, which are available as incentives under Section 17 40 040 B(1)(a) of the Affordable Housing Ordinance, shall be applied dunng the Development Revtew process for the East Rancho Verde Vtllage project, which shall be permitted vanances from those same restnctions as currently contained m the Development Code of the Ctty (t) The minimum butlding setback from a dnve aisle shall be not less than 12 feet; (u) The minimum butlding setback from the curb of a dnve aisle or other paved area to the face of a patio or balcony wall shall be not less than 6 feet, (m) The mtmmmn setback from the face of a patio or balcony wall to the neazest portion of any carport shall be not less than 6 feet, (tv) The mtmmum width of landscaped area between patio wall and sidewalk shall be not less than 2 feet; (v) The mimmum separation from butlding to butlding for atwo-story and a t]uee-story structure shall be not less than 30 feet, (vt) The mmunum separation from butlding to patio wall or balcony maybe not less than 20 feet, and frotn patio wall or balcony to patio wall or balcony shall be not less than 14 feet, (vn) The mtmmum number ofwasher/dryer facrhries shall be calculated at not less than one (1) washer and one (1) dryer for every six (6) apartment umts, and Housing Incentive Agreement P184 (vu) The minimum number of trees regmred to landscape the East Rancho Verde Village project shall be not less than twenty-five (25) trees per gross acre (e) Although the area within East Rancho Verde Vtllage totals less than the 5- acre mtntmuin noted to the Optional Development Standards, because of the operation of East Rancho Verde Village m conjunction with the Rancho Verde Village cotnmumty, and because the two protects will contain m excess of 13 acres, constmchon of the East Rancho Verde Vtllage project will be permitted on the Srte, which is currently zoned Medmm-High Residential 2 Ingress and Egress. Upon approval of Development Review of the Protect, the Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use attached hereto as Exhibit "C" (the "Reciprocal Easement Agreement") shall be recorded providing, govemmg and controlling the ~omt Ingress and egress for residents of Rancho Verde Village and East Rancho Verde Vtllage over each respective project and Iomt use of the commumty facilities located on the two projects including the commumty center and recreational amemhes (tot lot and hardcourt play area) located on East Rancho Verde Vtllage and swimming pools, tot lot, guest parking spaces, leasing office and~ogguig path located on Rancho Verde Vtllage. The area subject to the reciprocal ingress and egress agreement is depicted on Exlubrt "C" to the Reciprocal Easement Agreement, and the community center and related recreational amemhes are depicted on Exhibit "D" to the Reciprocal Easement Agreement. 3 Recreational Amenities Because some recreational facilities m both Rancho Verde Village and East Rancho Verde Village will be used by residents of both commumties, consideration and tabulation of required amemhes shall be determined during review of the Project as if both Rancho Verde Vtllage and East Rancho Verde Village were one protect, Items will be permitted to be duplicated between East Rancho Verde Village and Rancho Verde Vrllage to achieve overall compliance with the Development Code 4 Completion and Occupancy A schedule of completion and occupancy of the apartment umts In East Rancho Verde Village targeted for occupancy by very low income households and low income household is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by reference 5 Recitals The Recitals are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced and enforceable as any other provision of this Agreement 6. Binding Effect of Agreement The Owner and the City hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restnctions contained within thus Housing Incentive Agreement shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Owner's successors and assigns m title or interest to the Project, Owner agrees that this Housing Incentive Agreement shall be recorded to subject the Project and the Srte to the covenants, reservations and restnctions set forth herein Each and every contract, deed, regulatory agreement or other instrument hereinafter executed, covenng or conveying the Project, Housing Incentive Agreement S P185 the Site or any portion thereof shall conclusively to beheld to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed m this Housmg Incentive Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. 7 Relationship of Parties It is understood that the contractual relationship between the Crty and Owner is such that the Owner is an independent party and is not the agent of the City and is not to be considered as an agent of the Crty for any purpose whatsoever 8 Reerrlatory Agreement In addition to the requirements of this Housmg Incentive Agreement, the Owner shall comply with all of the terms and wnditions of the Regulatory Agreement and O&M Agreement with the Agency 9 Tenn of Agreement, The term of this Housing Incentive Agreement shall commence on the date of execution hereof by the Ctty and shall expire concurrently with expiration of the Regulatory Agreement This Housing Incentive Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated automatically if Owner does not obtain a certificate of occupancy for all of the Improvements wrtlun three (3) years from the effective date hereof 10 Indemmfication Owner agrees to mdemmfy, defend and hold Crty and rts elected officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may anse from the direct or indirect operations of Owner or those of its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees or other persons acting on rts behalf which relate to the Project Owner agrees to mdemmfy and shall defend City and rts elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Owner's activities m connection with the Protect with legal counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City Tlus mdemmficahon provision applies to all damages and claims the operations referred to m this Housmg hicentive Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Protect Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision shall not apply to any such clauns which anse out of, or by reason of, the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City, rts elected officials, agents and employees 11 Non-Lrabrhty of City Officials, Employees and Agents No member, official, employee, or agent of the City shall be personally liable to the Owner or any penmtted successor- m-interest of the Owner m the event of default or breach by the City or the Agency under this Housing Incentive Agreement or for any amount which may become due to the Owner, its successors or under any obligation under the terms of this Housmg Incentive Agreement 12 fynendments. Tlns Housing Incentive Agreement maybe amended or canceled, m whole or m part, only by mutual written consent of the Parties and then m the mamrer provided for m the Ordinances of the City. Housing Incentive Agreement 6 P186 13 Adnnnistrative Modifications Minor conflicts resulting from the stnct interpretation of the apphcahon of the City's development regulations with this Housing Incentive Agreement may be modified administratively by the City Planiter. 14 Enforcement hi the event of a default under the proviswns of this Housing hicentive Agreement by Owner, City shall give wntten nonce to Owner (or rts successor) at the address of the Protect, and by regstered or certified mail addressed to the address stated herein, and if such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satrsfaction of the City within thirty (30) days after such notice is given, or if not corrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot reasonably be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be coininenced within said 30 days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default hereunder and may bnng any action necessary to specifically enforce the obhgahons of Owner growing out of the operation of this Housing Incentive Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for ni~unchve relief against any violation by Owner of any provision of this Housing Incentive Agreement or apply for such other relief as maybe appropnate After completion of the Protect pursuant to the terms of this Housing hrcentive Agreement, any default may alternatively be enforced as any normal violation of the standards and provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Accordingly, Uie following penalty is specifically included as part of this Housing Incentive Agreement "It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnerslp, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Housing Incentive Agreement Airy person, firni, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Housing Incentive Agreement by farting to comply with any of rts requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or by impnsonment not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and impnsomnent Each such person, firm, partnership or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of aziy of the provisions of tlus Housing Incentive ' Agreement is committed, continued or penmtted by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, and shall be punishable therefore as herein provided " I5. Event of Default. Owner shall be m default under tkus Housing Incentive Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions (a) If a matenal warranty, representatron or statement is made or furnished by Owner to City and is false of proved to have been knowingly false m any matenal respect when it was made, (b) If a finding and determination is made by City following an annual review, upon the basis of substantial evidence that Owner has not complied m good faith with any matenal terms and conditions hereof, after nonce and opportunity to cure, or Aousmg Incentive Agreement P187 (c) A breach by Owner of any of the provisions or terms hereof, after nonce and opportunity to cure as provided herein 16. No Waiver of Remedies Crty does not waive any clann of defect m performance by Owner if on penodic review Crty does not enforce or terminate this Housing Incentive Agreement Nonperformance by Owner shall not be excused because performance by Owner of the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party or entity, other than City or the Agency. All other remedies at law or m equity which are not otherwise provided heiem or in City's regulations govenung housing incentive agreements are available to the Parties to pursue m the event that there is a breach hereof. No waiver by City of any breach or default of Owner under this Housing Incentive Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver by City of any other subsequent breach or default hereunder either of the same provision or any different provision hereof 17. Riehts of Lenders under this Agreement Should Owner place or cause to be placed any encumbrance or lien on the Protect, or any part thereof, the beneficiary ("Lender") of said encumbrance or hen, including, but not limited to, mortgages, shall have the nght at any time dunng the term hereof and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to (a) Do any act or thing required of Owner hereunder, and any such act or thing done or performed by Lender shall be as effective as if done by Owner itself, (b) Realize on the secunty afforded by the encumbrance or hen by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the secunty document evidencing the encumbrance or hen (hereinafter referred to as the "tmst deed"), (c) Transfer, convey or assign the title of Owner to the Project to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed, and (d) Acquire and succeed to the interest of Owner by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed The City agrees that the terms of this Housing hicentive Agreement are subordinate to any such financing instrument and shall execute fiom time to time any and all documentation reasonably t equested by Owner of Lender to effect such subordination 18 Notice to Lender City shall give wntteii notice of any Owner default or breach hereunder to Lender and afford Lender the opportunity after service of the notice to (a) Cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days after service of said notice, where the default can be cured by the payment of money Housing Incentive Agreement P188 (b) Cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days after service of said notice, where the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and can be cured wrtlun that time, or (c) Cure the breach or default in such reasonable tone as may be required where something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and camiot reasonably be performed within sixty (60) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the bieach or default are coimenced within a 60-day penod after service of said nonce of default on Lender by Cdy and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender to completion 19 Action by Lender Notwithstanding any other provision of this Housing Incentive Agreement, a Lender may forestall any action by City for a breach or default under the terms hereof by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encuibrance by order of court or under a power of sale contained m the instrument creating the encumbrance or hen The proceedings shall not, however, forestall any such action by the City for the default or breach by Owner unless (a) They are commenced within sixty (60) days after service on Lender of the notice descnbed heremabove, (b) They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursued m the manner required by law to completion, and (c) Lender keeps and performs all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Housing Incentive Agreement requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Owner until the foreclosure proceedings are complete or are discharged by redemption, satisfaction or payment 20 Rent Control In consideration for the limitations herein provided, City agrees that rt shall not, dunng the term of this Housing Incentive Agreement, take any action, the effect of which will be to control, determine or affect the rents for those low income rental units located in the Protect, except as otherwise provided lierein Enforcement of the Regulatory Agreement and/or the O&M Agreement by the City and/or the Agency shall be specifically permitted and reserved to the City and the Agency, as applicable 21 Notice Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Housing Incentive Agreement shall be provided by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such address as maybe later specified by the parties hereto Owner The Southern Cahfomia Housing Development Corporation 9065 Haven Avenue, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, Califonua 91730 Attn President Housing Incentive Agreement P189 Ctty~ Crty of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfomia 91730 22 Attorneys' Fees In any proceedings ansmg from the enforcement hereof or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevatltng party shall be entitled to recover its costs and rts i easonable attorneys' fees incurred dunng the proceeding as may be fixed wrtlun the dtscretion of the court 23 Bmdmg Effect This Houstg Incentive Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof shall Inure to, the respective parties hereto and their legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, wherever the context requires or adintts 24. Applicable Law Thls Housing Incentive Agreement shall be construed m accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Caltforma 25 Partial Invalidity If any provisions hereof shall be deemed to be invalid, Illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not m any way be affected or Impaired thereby 26 Recordation Tlus Housing Incentive Agreement shall, at the expense of Owner, be recorded m the Official Records of the County Recorder of the San Bemardmo County IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Housing Incentive Agreement shall be effecttve on the date It Is signed by the Crty (the "effective date" hereof) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated , 200_ ATTEST City Clerk By _ Name By _ Naine Title. [signatures continue on following page] Housing Incentive Agreement 10 P190 Approval as to Form Ctty Attorney 13y - Name Dated , 200_ THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Caltfomta nonprofit public benefit corporation sy - Name Title Rousing Incenhve Agreement 11 P191 EXHIBIT "A" [legal description of East Rancho Verde Village] Housing Incentive Agreement P192 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1 8819 Sterra Madre Avenue That portion of Lot 29 in Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Map of Cucamonga Lends, as per Map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows. Beginning 695.96 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Lot, thence South 474.09 feet to the North line at and Sante Fe Railroad right of way, thence Easterly along said right of way to the East line of Lot 29, thence North to the Northeast corner, thence West to the point of beginning Excepting therefrom that portion lying West of the Southerly extension of the West Ime of Sierra Madre Avenue and excepting the North 97.01 feet and excepting the South 240 feet thereof A-1 P193 Patcel 2' 8839 Siena Madre Avenue PARCEL 1. The South 240 feet of that portion of Lot 29, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the Map of Cucamonga Lands, in the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Cal'rforma, as per Map recorded In Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, lying Easterly of the Southerly prolongation of the Westerly line of Sierra Madre Avenue, as said Avenue is shown on the Maps of Eureka Gardens, Tract No. 1829, as per Plat recorded in Book 28, Page 20, of Maps, Records of said Coun[y PARCEL 2: Anon-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and across that portion of Lot 29, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, lying within the Southerly extension of Sierra Madre Avenue, es said Avenue is shown on the Map of the Eureka Gardens Tract No 1829, as per Plat recorded in Book 28, Page 20 of Maps, Records of said County. Excepting therefrom the South 240 feet A-2 P194 EXIIIBIT "B" [legal description of Rancho Verde Village] Housing Incentive Agreement P195 EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF TRACT MAP NO 12091, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 177 AT PAGES 175 THROUGH 178 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY P196 EXHIBIT "C" [Reciprocal Easement Agreement] Housing L~ceahve Agreement P197 Recording Requested By -- and -- And When Recorded Mail To. The Southern Cahfomia Housing Development Corporation 9065 Haven Avenue, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn• Executive Director SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DECLARATION OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND COMMON USE THIS DECLARATION OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND COMMON USE (the "Declazation") is dated as of , 200_ and is made on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions. RECITALS A The undersigned ("Declarant") is the owner of two adjacent parcels of real property located m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California On one of the parcels, Declarant currently owns and operates a 243-uiut affordable housing apartment complex coixunoiily known as Rancho Verde Village (sometunes referred to herein as "Parcel 1" or "Rancho Verde Village"), which is descnbed more specifically on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference Declarant also owns the adjacent parcel located irrunediately east of and contiguous to Rancho Verde Village (winch real property is sometimes refereed to herein as "Parcel 2," "East Rancho Verde Village" or the "Site"), descnbed more specifically on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and mcoiporated herein by reference Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 are sometimes referred to herein individually as a "Parcel" and collectively as the "Pazcels " B Declazant intends to develop and construct forty (40) 3-bedroom apartment units to form East Rancho Verde Village, which will be managed and operated as an apartment coinmumty providing affordable housing for fainihes of very low, low and moderate income Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P198 C Under the terms of that certain Affordable Housing Agreement dated June 28, 2005 between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and Declarant, as ainended (the "Affordable Housing Agreement") relating to acquisition of, financing for, and construction and use of improvements on Parcel 2, Declarant has agreed to mamtatn and operate Rancho Verde Vrllage and East Rancho Verde Vtllage as two sepazate and distinct apartment communities Declarant has also agreed to certain restnctions on use and operation of East Rancho Verde Vtllage which are contained m the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restncttve Covenants between the Agency and Declarant and m the Operation and Maintenance Agreement between the Agency and Declarant, both of which are dated July 6, 2005 and which were recorded on July 22, 2005 as Document Nos 2005-0530600 and 2005-0530601, respectively, of the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California D Declarant and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Crty") have entered into that certain Housing Incentive Agreement dated as of , 200_ The Housing Incentive Ageement confirms certain incentives to Declarant to the development of East Rancho Verde Village granted by the Crty under the provisions of Chapter 17 40 010, et seq (the "Affoidable Housing Ordinance") of the Ordmarices of the Crty This Declaration is executed by Declarant m satisfaction of applicable executory provisions of the Houstng Incentive Agreement E Although Declarant will provide emergency access to East Rancho Verde Village from Sierra Madre Avenue (at which location fire and other emergency access will be provided to both East Rancho Verde Village and Rancho Verde Vtllage), on a day-to-day basis the residents of East Rancho Verde Village can only gam access to their apartment units by dnvmg across existing dine aisles within Rancho Verde Village F Declarant is construcring certain recreational aniemties as a part of East Rancho Verde Village, including a community center, a tot lot and a hazdcourt play area, which amenities will also be made available for use to the residents of Rancho Verde Village Additionally, certain amenities located on the Rancho Verde Vrllage property, that is, swtmrrung pools, a tot lot, guest parking spaces, the leasing office, and the logging path, will be made available for use to the residents of East Rancho Verde Village G Iii order to guaranty access by the East Rancho Verde Vrllage residents to their apartment units and to confirm reciprocal easements for the use of dnveways and dnve aisles on both East Rancho Verde Village and Rancho Verde Village which provide ingress and egiess to and from both Parcels, and to confirm the use of amenities on both Parcels by the residents of each, Declarant desires to subJect the Pazcels to the easements descnbed herein for the benefit of the present and future owners of each of the Parcels and their respective tenants and occupants and their guests and mwrtees Declara4on of Reciprocal Easements far Ingress and Egress and Conunoa Use P199 OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in constderahon of the foregomg Recitals and the mutual covenants and conditions set forth m tins Declaratton and for other good and valuable constderahon, the receipt and sufficiency of which rs hereby acluiowledged, Declarant hereby declares that the Parcels shall beheld, conveyed, encumbered, leased, occupied or otherwise used and transferred subject to the iecrprocal nghts and easements created m this Declaration 1 Access breress mid Egress Easement. Each of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 owned by Declarant shall have appurtenant to that Parcel a nonexclusive, perpetual easement for pedestnan, pedestnan vehicle and light truck access, ingress, egress and travel over and across that Parcel to favor of the other Parcel, covenng those portions of the Pazcels depicted on the attached Exhrbrt "C" (the common dnveway area depicted on Exhrbrt "C" rs referred to herein as the "Dnveway" or the "Dnveway Easement Area") Additionally, Parcel 2 shall have appurtenant to that Parcel anon-exclustve, perpetual easement over Parcel 1 for the tenants and occupants of Parcel 2 to use guest parking spaces located on Parcel 1 (the "Guest Parking Easement") The easement nghts granted under this Section 1 are to be stnctly interpreted and, except as is specifically provided by the Guest Parking Easement, aze not intended to, and do not, confer the nght of the residents of a Parcel to park on the other Pazcel The easements descnbed herein are appurtenant to each Parcel, and each Parcel is both benefitted and burdened thereby These easements are for the benefit and enjoyment of the owner of each Parcel and of all occupants thereof and their respective employees, agents, customers and guests, invitees, heirs, successors and assigns Notwrthstandtngttie generality of the foregomg, however, use of such easements, the Dnveway Easement Area on each Parcel and the area on Parcel 1 subject to the Guest Parking Easement shall be subject to reasonable rules, regulations and restnctions as provrded herein The owner of each Parcel may snake any subsurface use of that portion of a Dnveway Easement Area located on that owner's Parcel which does not unreasonably interfere with the surface use of the Dnveway Easement Area 2. Joutt Use ofAmen:taes. (a) A cotmnumty room will be located within Building No 3 to be constructed by Declarant as a part of the improvements constituting East Rancho Verde Village, situated generally m the area shown on Exlubrt "D" hereto (the "Community Room") and Declarant will also construct a tot lot and hazdcourt play area as a part of the East Rancho Verde Village project. Declarant shall make the Commumty Room, tot lot and hardcourt play area located on East Rancho Verde Village available for use to the residents of both East Rancho Verde Village and Rancho Verde Village, subject to the right of Declarant or Declarant's successor as the owner of Parcel 2 to adopt reasonable rules and regulations regarding scheduling and use thereof, which might include, but not be lunited to, future execution of use agreements with indemnification provisions and the provision of insurance Declaratton of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P200 (b) In addthon to those portions of Parcel 1 subject to the Guest Parking Easement, Declarant shall make certain amentties located wrthtn Rancho Verde Vtllage, namely the swmumng pools, a tot lot, the teasing office and the ~oggrng path, available for use to the restdents of both East Rancho Vet de Village and Rancho Verde Village, subject to the nght of Declarant or Declarant's successor as the owner of Parcel 1 to adopt reasonable rules and regulations regarding scheduling and use of the guest parking spaces and those other fisted amenities, which might include, but not be limited to, future execution of use agreements with indemnification provtstons and the provision of insurance (c) If any use authonzed by the provtstons hereof of the amenities on East Rancho Vetde Vtllage by the restdents of Rancho Verde Vtllage, of the amenities located on Rancho Verde Vtllage by the restdents of East Rancho Verde Village results m any increase or surcharge m the insurance premiums payable by the owner of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2, respectively, the amount of such increase or surcharge assessed to one owner shall be payab]e by the other owner within ten (10) days following presentation of an invoice or statement therefore, accompanied by a copy of the insurer's billing evidencing such increase or surcharge 3. Insurance Declarant, whle rt is the owner ofboth Parcels, and its successor(s) as the owner of each of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, shall obtain and maintain comprehensive public hab4tty insurance msunng the owner of each of the respective Parcels against any habthty incident to the use, maintenance or ownership of the Dnveway Easement Area and of any shared amemhes and naming the other owner as an additional insured thereon and thereunder 4 L¢demmty. Notwithstanding the provision of insurance m compliance with paragraph 3 above, the owner of each of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 shall tndetmufy and hold the owner of the other Parcel free uid harmless from and against any and all habthhes, claims, damages, costs, losses, proceedings and causes of action including, but not linitted to, attorneys' fees, anstng from any act or omission of the owner of a Parcel and its occupants, tenants and their guests wlule using that portion of the Dnveway Easement Area located on the other Parcel or while using the Community Room and other amemhes descnbed m Section 2 above, providing that such use shall be m accordance with the provtstons hereof and reasonable rules azrd regulations that maybe enacted as provided herein 5. Manttertance The owner of each Parcel shall mamtaut, at that owner's cost and expense, that pothon of the Dnveway Easement Area which is located on such owner's Parcel m good and clean condtton and repatr The owner of Parcel 1 shall mazntam, at that owner's cost and expense, those porttons of Parcel 1 on which guest parking spaces which are subject to the Guest Parking Easement are located tit good and clean condttton and repatr Maintenance shall include, without being limited to, maintaining, seating and restnpmg, as necessary, the concrete and/or asphaltic concrete surface thereof m a smooth and evenly covered condttton with a type of surfacing matenal ongtnally installed or with such substitute as shall m all respects be at least equal m quality, use and durability to the ongtnal surfacing matenal The owner of East Rancho Verde Vtllage shall mamtam the Comtnumty Room, the tot lot and the hardcourt play area Declaration of Reaprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use 4 P201 located wrthm the East Rancho Verde Village property m a good and clean condition and repair, and the owner of Rancho Verde Village shall mamtam the swumrung pools, tot lot, leasing office and ~oggrug path located wrthm the Rancho Verde Village property m a good and clean condtion and repair. Notwithstanding the generality of the maurtenance obligations contained herein, if, by reason of a default, an owner of a Parcel causes the maintenance on the other Parcel to be performed, the owner of the Parcel perfonnmg the work shall be entitled to recover maintenance costs incurred m comiechon with mamtammg the Dnveway or the amenities on the other Parcel, as well as any costs associated with or arcing from an act or occurrence m violation of any rules and regulations which has resulted m damage. 6 Failure to Mnintain. Cunne De cult Except m the case of an emergency threatemng life or property (in which case wntten notice shall not be required for an owner to take action necessary to abate the dangerous condition), m the event of any breach or threatened breach of any of the provisions of this Declaration by any owner or an occupant, tenant or guest of either Rancho Verde Village or East Rancho Verde Village, if an owner fails to perform that owner's obligations fo(lowmg thirty (30) days wntten notice specifying the nature of the default from the other Parcel owner, the other owner shall have the nglit, but not the obligation, to do or perform such act as may be necessary to cute the breach of the defaulting owner, including, but not limited to, mamtammg the Dnveway Easement Area on the defaulting owner's Parcel The defaulting owner shall reimburse the performing owner for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the performing owner m performance of the defaulting owner's maintenance obligations Reunbursement shall be made within thirty (30) days after presentation to the defaulting owner of paid invoices demonstrating the work performed. To the extent necessary, a non-defaulting owner shall have a license to enter upon the defaulting owner's Parcel to perform any required work 7 Use Each owner of a Parcel inay make any use of that portion of a Dnveway Easement Area located on such owner's Parcel which does not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of the Dnveway Easement Area by the occupants, tenants, guests and invitees of the other Parcel Each owner shall be entitled to keep and mamtam signs controlling speeding, directional signs, and other traffic calming devices on such owuer's Parcel as may be approved by the City or a may be reasonably necessary to enforce reasonable traffic rules and regulations on each Parcel However, other than traffic srgnage, conhol and calming devices, no owner shall construct or mamtam any unprovement on such owner's Parcel which prohibits or unreasonably uiliibits the use of the Dnveway Easement Area by the occupants, tenants, guests and uivitees of the other Parcel, except that dunng construction of hnprovements m East Rancho Verde Village, Declarant may take reasonable precautions to prohibit the use of the Dnveway Easement Areas located on East Rancho Verde Village until completion of such hnprovements to protect members of the public from construction or excavation activities and to prohibit use of such areas on East Rancho Verde Vrllage which would delay, obstruct or make construction of Improvements thereon more expensive Except as herein provided, no building, fence, wall, hedge, bamcade or obstruction of any kind shall be erected or maintained on or wrthm the Dnveway Easement .Area Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Conunon Use S P202 8 Exclzistvzty The Easements granted and retained hereunder are non-exclusive ant shall be used in common by the occupants, guests, invitees, and pennittees of the owners of each Parcel and their successors and assigns 9 Exemption from Ltnbzlzty No owner may except itself from liability for its share of any expenses incurred under this Declaration which are to be charged to that owner, nor release that owner's Parcel from the lien and charges established in this Declaratton, by waiver of the use or enloytnent of the Dnveway Easement Area located on such owner's Parcel or by the abandoiunent of that owner's Parcel. 10 Covenants to Rzm With the Land Each and every one of the provisions of this Declaration to be performed on the part of Declarant or Declarant's successors and assigns as the owners of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2, including the benefits and the burdens hereof, shall run with title to each of the said Parcels and shall binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, assigns, successors and owners of each of the Parcels Each of the Parcels shall be held, transferred, encumbered, used, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the provisions of t}us Declaratton which shall run with title to each of the Parcels in perpetuity I 1 Method o(Amendment The provisions of this Declaration may be modified or amended, m whole or m part, only by an instrument m venting, executed and acknowledged by the owners of Parcel 1 and Parce] 2, which venting has been consented to by the City and duly recorded m the Official Records of San Bemardmo County, California. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, however, the consent of any mortgagee or holder of a secunty interest in Parcel I or Parcel 2 shall be required in order to cause the interest of such mortgagee or ho]der of a secunty interest m existence at the time of such proposed amendment to be subordinate to such amendment It is expressly understood and agreed that no modification or amendment, in whole or m part, of this Declaration shall requtre consent or approval on the part of any tenant or occupant of the Parcels 12 No Third Pnrh~ Beneficiary Except for the provtstons of this Declaration which are expressly stated to be for the benefit of the City, the provisions of this Declaratton are for the benefit of the owners, occupants, guests, tenants and invitees of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 and not for the benefit of any third party, nor shall this Declaration be deemed to have conferred any nghts, express or unphed, upon any third person or upon the public generally Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to be a gift to the general public of the creation upon any portion of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2 of any of the easements created hereunder of any interest for any public purpose whatsoever, it being the uitent of Declarant that this Declaration shall be stnctly limited to and for the purposes herein expressed 13 Effect ofForecloszzre If any Parcel subject to a hen created by any provision under this Dcclaration is subject to the hen of a bonafide mortgage or encumbrance, (t) the foreclosure of any lien created by anything set forth to this Declaration shall not operate to affect or impair the ]ten of such mortgage or deed of trust, and (it) the foreclosure of the lien of such Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Coaunon Use P203 mortgage or deed of bust, the acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure of such mortgage or deed of trust or a sale under the power of sale contained in any such mortgage or deed of trust (these events shall be referred to collectively as "Events of Foreclosure") shall not operate to affect or impair the lien of this Declaration, except that any person or persons who obtained an uterest through any of the Eveuts of Foreclosure and their successors m interest shall take title free of the obligation to pay monetary amounts imposed by this Declaration pnor to the time of any of the Events of Foreclosure, but shall be subject to the lien of this Declaration for all charges which occur after the Events of Foreclosure 14 No Easement by Imokcatron. Pret~erihon ofPrescrzphve Rilrhts Neither the execution of this Declaration nor the granting of the easements described herein shall be deemed to grant any other easement or to establish any other easement by imphcatron or prescription, and the parties to this Declazation and their successors understand and agree that the only easements and/or licenses made and granted herein and hereby are the easements and/or licenses which are expressly made and granted by the specific terms of this Declaration. The Declarant hereby acknowledges that, except as specifically provided by the terms of this Declaration, nothing contained herein shall be deemed to grant to any person or entity the right to enter generally upon or generally cross over any portion of Parcel 1 or Pazce1 2, other than the areas encumbered by the specific easements granted by and described rn the terms ofthts Declaration. 15 Protection ofMort~ees A breach of the restrictions, conditions, covenants and reservations contained m this Declaration shall not defeat or render invalid the hen of any mortgagee or beneficiary under any duly recorded mortgage or deed of trust encumbering all or any interest of any owner m either Parcel 1 or Parcel 2, made m good forth and for value The restrictions, covenants and reservations contained m this Declaration shall be bmdmg upon and effective against any owner or owners of any such Parcel or any portion or portions of such Parcel, whose title was acquired by foreclosure, trustee's sale or otherwise 16 Severabrlrty If any term, provision or condition contained m this Declaration shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Declaration, or the application of such term, provision or condition to persons or circumstances other than those bath respect to which rt is mvahd or unenforceable, shall not be effected thereby and each term, provision and condition of this Declaration shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted bylaw 17 Buiding_E(iect This Declaration shall, except as otherwise provided herein, be bmdmg upon and enure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns 18 Rt~hts of Ctty This Declaration may not be amended or terminated without the pnor written consent of the Ctty The City shall be constdered a third party beneficiary to this Declaration, which interest shall give the Crty the right, but not the obligation, by action at law or m egmty, to enforce all provisions of this Declaration The Crty shall have a perpetual easement created by the provisions of this Declaration for ingress and egress upon and over any Parcel for Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress end Egress and Common Use P204 the purpose of enforcing any maintenance required by the provisions of this Declaration or of City ordinances, for trash collection and to enforce the provisions of Crty ordinance relating to traffic control, Any cost, expense and expert and attorneys' fees incurred by the City relating to the cunng of any default m the observance or enforcement of tins Declaration, including all costs m maintaining, repainng, replacing or otherwise performing work on or providing matenals to the Parcels, whether the work or matenals were furnished by the City or by pnvate contractors designated by the City, shall promptly be reimbursed from the owner of the affected Parcel to the City No failure by the City to enforce any default hereunder shall be deemed to be a waiver of the tight or power of the City to enforce that same default, or a different default, at any later time In the event that the City is the prevailing party m an enforcement action under ties Declaration, the City shall have the nglit to collect its reasonable attomeys' fees, costs and expenses associated with any such action or proceeding 19. Attorneys' Fees If any action or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Declaration, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation m connection with any of the provisions of this Declaration or to interpret this Declaration or any of the provisions hereof, the successful or prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attomeys' fees and other costs incurred n that action or proceeding, whether or not said action or proceeding goes to final Judgement, m addition to any other relief to which it or they maybe entitled, which shall include any past-Judgment attomeys' fees, any attorneys' fees incurred by the prevailing part on appeal, by the prevailing party For any post-Judgment motion proceedings or heanngs, and any and all attorneys' fees incurred in any and all efforts by the prevailing party to collect rts Judgment 20 Authors Execution of this Declaration shall be presumed to be made by an individual authonzed by tus or her respective corporation by resolution of its board of directors and such execution shall constitute a waiver by that party of any lack of such a resolution 21 Govenun~ Law This Declaration shall be construed and governed m accordazice wdh tiie laws of the State of Cahforma 22 Msscellaneous When used herein, the masculine and neuter genders, the singular number and the present tense shall be deemed to include the femuune gender, the plural number and past and future tenses, respectively, where the context so requires IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Declaration as of the day and year first above wntten "DECLARANT" The Southern Califonua Housing Development Corporation, a Cahfonua nonprofit public benefit corporation By Richard J Wluttingham, CFO Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress end Egress and Common Use P205 Exhibit "A" [Legal Description of Rancho Verde Village] Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P206 RANCHO VERDE VII.LAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF TRACT MAP NO 12091, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OP SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 177 AT PAGES 175 THROUGH 178 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY P207 Eahrbit "B" [Legal Desorption of East Rancho Verde Village] Declaration of Rectprocel Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P208 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1. 8819 Sterra Madre Avenue That portion of Lot 29 in Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Map of Cucamonga Lands, as per Map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, m the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows Beginning 895 96 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Lot, thence South 474.09 feet to the North line at and Santa Fe Railroad right of way; thence Easterly along said right of way to the East line of Lot 29, thence North to the Northeast corner, thence Wast to the point of beginning Excepting therefrom that portion lying West of the Southerly extension of the West Ime of Sierra Madre Avenue and excepting the North 97 01 feet and excepting the South 240 feet thereof. A-1 P209 Pazcel 2 8839 Sterna Madre Avenue PARCEL 1: The South 240 feet of that portion of Lot 29, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the Map of Cucamonga Lands, in [he City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Californca, as per Map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, rn the Office of the County Recorder of said County, lying Easterly of the Southerly prolongation of the Westerly line of Sierra Madre Avenue, as said Avenue rs shown on the Maps of Eureka Gardens, Tract No. 1829, as per Plet recorded in book 28, Page 20, of Maps, Records of said County PARCEL 2: Anon-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and across that portion of Lot 29, Section 9, Township t South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, lying within the Southerly extension of Sierra Madre Avenue, as said Avenue is shown on the Map of the Eureka Gardens Tract No 1829, as per Plat recorded in Bcok 28, Page 20 of Maps, Records of said County. ExcepLng therefrom the South 240 feet A-2 P210 Exhibit "C" [Common Driveway/Ingress and Egress] Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Conunon Use MASTER SITE PLAN Rancho Verde Village & East Rancho Verde Village EXHIBIT C i..~.r~~ N 1 1 P212 Exhibit "D" [Conmmnity Room] Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress end Egress and Common Use P213 g ~~ 6~ ~~ ~' i § o ~ qn E ^~ x B 9 Ongg nnn x d ~~~ ~~ ~~I~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~BId deli la~l§ ~• }~ ~~ ~ xii ,~~ pie }I 1~ } l...~. e i ~+ ;jai }} ~}i~ o~!~ I !} ~~~ €~li sii ~,~ }t~ ~P@j! ~ ~~~~~ ~~,o. w U Z O v ~3 ~ 8 Ck b ~I N A d s. 0 0 W .,y '~ O OA W O ~.+ ~..i S~ G ~_~, ~'1 <j ~~ V ro W `~ ro c O ro s~ m U" a ~~ ro u U i..r S C K er cad Fd a a~ ~i W P214 N A E~ F~ P215 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Cahfornta County of San Bemardmo On 200 ,before me, Date personally appeared ss Name and Title of Offwer (e g , "lone Doe, Notary Public") Nnme(s) of Signcr{s) Place Nalory Seal Above ^ personally known to me ^ proved to me on the basts of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscnbed to the wttlun instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same m tits/her/then authonzed capactty(tes), and that by tits/her/their stgnature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the enttty upon behalf of whtch the person(s) acted, executed the instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal S~gnatun: of Notary Public Though the a fa rnnhon be/orv rs not re9ttued by lne; r! nmy prove vafunble to persons re/ymg on the documen[ and could pr event fi nudulent removn( nrrd reattachment ojdus john ro nnotlrer doaunenl Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Docutent Declaratton of Recturocal Easements for Ingress & Eeress and Cotmnon Use Document Dated .200 Number of Pages 8 Signer(s) Other Than Named Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name ^ Individual ^ Corporate Officer - Tttle(s)'_ ^ Partner - ^ Ltmtted ^ General ^ Attorney m Fact ^ Trustees ^ Guardian or Conservator Other Stgnerts Representing arght nnmbpnnt of Signer Declaratton of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P216 EXHIBIT "D" [Schedule of Completion and Occupancy of East Rancho Verde Vtllage] Housing Incentive Agreement P217 EXHIBIT "D" EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE EXPANSION AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE Item Key Components Approx. Date Acquisition Phase 1 Hard Deposit Release to Fidelity of $10,000 -SFH (8819 Sierra Madre) 2/3/2005 2 Hard Deposit Release to Fidelity of $10,000 -Vacant Lot (8839 Sierra Madre) 2/3/2002 3 Open Escrow -SFH (8819 Sierra Madre) 2/4/2005 4 Open Escrow -Vacant Lot (8839 Sierra Madre) 2/11/2005 5 Hard Deposit Release to Fidelity of $40,000 to EMend Escrow -SFH (8819 Sierra Madre) 6/3/2005 6 Owner closes Escrow - $450,000 Vacant Lot (8839 Slerra Madre) 6/27/2005 7 Owner closes Escrow - $405,000 SFH (8819 Sierra Madre) 7/1/2005 Financlng Phase 8 Agency makes Financial Commitment 7/6!2005 9 Agency & Owner execute Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) 7/13/2005 10 Agency reimburses Owner of 8819 and 8839 acgwsitions 7/28/2005 11 Agency reimburses and releases funds for predevelopment expenses 8/12/2005 12 Owner files San Bernardino County (SBC) HOME Application 9/1/2005 13 SBC & Owner execute HOME Loan Agreement 10/14/2005 14 SBC releases funds for construction 5/15/2007 15 Owner releases funds for construction 5/15/2007 16 Bank executes construction loan & makes funds available for construction 5/15/2007 Pre-Construction Phase 17 Owner, architect and civil engineer meet to coordinate design review process 7/24!2005 23 Owner submits schematics to City for Design Review 12/6/2005 24 City completes Design Revew -Planning Commission Approval 12/13/2006 25 Owner submits Housing Incentive Agreement to City 10/16!2006 26 City Council approves Housing Incentive Agreement 11/1/2006 27 Owner submits construction documents ("final drawings") to Agency 11/15/2006 28 Agency approves construction documents 11/30/2006 29 Owner submits construction documents to City for Plan Check 12/14/2006 30 Owner submits revised proposed Protect Budget to Agency 1/15/2007 31 Agency rewews and approves Final Protect Budget 1/30/2007 32 City completes Plan Check - Bwlding & Engineering Department Approvals 5/1/2007 Construction Phase 33 Owner pulls grading permit & begins grading 5/15/2007 34 Owner completes grading & pulls bldg permits 6!1/2007 35 Owner starts construction 6!1/2007 36 Owner completes construction 6/1/2008 Lease-UO Phase 37 Owner/Manager starts lease-up 6/1/2008 38 Owner/Manager completes lease-up, property 100% occupied 9/1/2008 P218 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of San Bernardino On , 2006, before me, Date personally appeared ss Name and Title of Officer (e g , "Jane Doe, Notary Public") Name(s) of Signer(s) ^ personally known to me ^ proved to me on the bads of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same In his/her/their authorized capaclty(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the Instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the Instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not regwred by law, d may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of thts form to another document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document Houslng Incentive Agreement Document Dated Number of Pages Signer(s) Other Than Named Above Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name ^ Individual ^ Corporate Officer -Title(s) _ ^ Partner - ^ Limited ^ General ^ Attorney In Fact ^ Trustees ^ Guardian or Conservator Other Signer is Representing Right Thumbprint of Signer Housing Incentive Agreement FjCNl61T 8 4, F~ oso~o-sooan ~aa V z ` ~,~ ~ V ~i FageE ~ 5 § ~ ~~ ` _ ~~ ^C' ' ~ W ~ s= ~., , ^ Q ~ S lO ~l '` y II I N ~v ,V ~ i i Q;f ~ i ~ F- i F iNii ~~ a h~ h v~ o ~ ~_ oho >~ ~ U ~ _ ~o U ° O ~ N~ ,~, o ~ v c W ~ ryN R m ~ NU C C c G .S~ mE p ~~ ~~ ~ N 3~ ~ E o ~ ~ O I w P219 ~__ ~__ f ~ gel; ~1~1~~1 3 ~~ saa:~ ea ~~ E yz F GmP 5 .e. K Ua` O .`~] S t - 'd -- '~ 5a~ g4Fagaaces o m ~~s ~md_ Z Q d w H w N Q oso~o-sooa# ~aa , P i l t , M1 ~ ' ll l \ 9 __ ~ U '~; ._ lil I Q S~ ,~,I' <€~ ~ ~ a pp , / _ ' o i PI~ ~• III .~ l~ _ I i A 11 ~~ rel. Ili'' " .a, ,. i, il~; , ~~ ~,f ,I~~~ i - ~ ~~~ I ~i ~ ~~~i 1 ~ ~° i z sg ~ F@ ~ `~ S ~~i,' ~4b~~a f wJ `\ v~ ~ ~~ ~o `~ U so U ~ ~ N~ U V ,~ O U Iro1 W 0 gW w¢ m ~ ~ ~~ '~~, ~ ~~ ~a ¢E =N `m9 n ~ by V o ~-~ ~ $ a~ i b ~E a ~~~~~ ~~~,E G~~ V °,g~~ ~ 00©00 egg E E~~ ~ . :~€ E`:E '+~ Ye~Eg4}C s~~~t~~~ . ...z: e 100®000000® sr 4 ~% i'F ~ ~ _ qq 4 FF ~ I ~ ~ Z ' ~ ( [ O ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ { ` Y ~ 3 ~ ~ V 9 i ~ u . a - u a2S w G ~ { 4{~~ T 5~8 ~ •~ F~ 5 g ~ ~ ~~~ . s fIf ~ ; ~ ~~`~; ;~~ g ~ s4 ~ y 5 p p C s p ( w '~ ~ ~ ~ i @ i LL i t ~~ 7 w li ~ ~ ! f~ ~~f~ ~~~ ~~~d~ ~~~~~ t ~ 3~(~~ ~s ~ ~ r j ~~~ ~~ ~~ e~~ i ` t ~~; `t ~l f 9 F ~~~ ~ ® ~ x ® 7 1 ~~ ~ ~~ c = ~1 v, N fi~ a l$ hW `MJ `\ n/, ^W ~ W O v 0 ~° s °° U ~ C ~ V_ V ,~ o ~ U I '~ ~ W ~ L~ ~~ ~~ ~~ oso~o-sooza oaa ,P222 ( `~~~=, ~e~ Y=~ BUIlDINO DATA (BLDGS A7 611 ilAEf SiOAY SiACKfO Mi MMIMFNI BUIOING UNR T?FY M1OOP. IKI 'A' iNAFF BtORWµ TVO BAiH lMN Sf ~ 9' 1NRfF BfOROOAB, IW01AiN I,i16 SI I6) LOIAL fACH HCOR K ] fIOORS (I}1 NAN A 161 PUN "B' I1B) LOiM EACN BVIV)ING M6%Sf K 1 OCNPANCY ptOUP IYPF V 1 HR CONSiRVCIION f VVY 5P0.1NKLFAEf1 End Vlew wmn Typical Floor Plan (Ground Level) 1st Floor 6,936 s f 21d Floor 6,800 s f 3rd Floor 6,880 s TOTAL 20,696sf a a I6 Ko APARTMENT BUILDING Section B-B Southern Caldomta Housing 9065 Haven Ave sta n,no East Rancho Verde Village narrow clwarnoil9a. cA streo ~~~~, Rancho Cucamonga, California Section A-A c S ti C C c ec on - ,- tj v c C n n PITA551 ARCHITECTS INC ~ N N 1 1 ~ L ~ b0 I ~ ~~. i i b ~ m Li. - M' I , ~ ~I I ___ . _ ___- ' I _ _ - as is ~ o_ T . 1 i i i i ~>k ~ I ' i ~ m ~ ~ i i TYPE "C 1" a*° ., TYPE "C 1" ~ i ~- c° TYPE "C" TYPE "LY ~ '~} i I ~ ~ i i i ~ ~)t J ~ {1...,,. L I ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ _ 68 _ _ [ CA Si .a ; r I _____ ~ a ~- _~ '~ ~ I ~ .. .., e.e - 'I ~ - -- .... i ~ , I ~~ ~ t ~ ~ ~-------= ' . I ~ I i i / m ~ First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan BUILDING DATA_ 1#Fbor 5,751 s( ~ ~-~I Ind Floor 1,967 s ( ~ 1~11CC/~1 TiO sroer corwanm cwrzx evnmvc na noon iow.nmm ceurza wr i,wHOnv a iw~ rnaimrs~ Vves~ rievaaon ,1 .ua O O r O N O O N U +c O J ~J A South Elevation ~.., Donn tlevaoon ~°-~ , -.: _~ TYPICAL CARPORT u~w~e . 9_ °, 3 _ 0 . ~ a g ~ 9 ~~ mw.w ~l~v~_ vrw wowww TYPICAL TRASH ENCLOSDRE vwna ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT FEATURES P :..,., 0 co 0 0 0 N Soutlxm California Homing o Development Corporation # 9085 Heven AVe SIe R,~ East Rancho Verde Village ~ o Rendro Cucamrnpa, CA 9/730 Rancho Cucamonga, California PITASSI ARCHIT~ S ir+rN ..„.~.,~.,,n ~ ~x.nesegm... N cn _ ~ ~ ~~ ~ivavew ....a ~ x --+L ~ . . irrnx a.nwna,c u~ra SRE WALL ELEVATIONS IAwn•a ..e ~,.e.,..~... 4 j~ 6@fic8~@P~ I $oL$•I£ i ~\ n aJ `a6 ~,_~ ~@ e ~~ € C N ¢ppspgEq~pEpgE4Edgeerze 8~FFeF6~e?@@@@@'3@ ee recces: neeeae e ~~ ~'/ ~@ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ n J L ~ i E Q s gg ~n~d B yyE~Q ~ 5 k~g (6 ~ C7 @ ~3'a~y@~C¢@ ` 5 ka ~ a 4 g1~n Aec 4Y~~~ ~ ek e~8 qe~ a~ need nRk ~~~a~e §~e e` ~~ n ~ ~gG e " 6 4 ~ $e ti n'° fi6 g g 3p g x ~ ~ ~ c ~a@ ° @ a ~~ BipB a ~:~k~ @= ~~ ~ ~ ae~ ~~~5n~~~~~9 e~~@~@adan ~spp 3B @$ a ~ p ~ep~8a' @ yy p5~ka °@ S Ep -°'ii 5g~gg ~ ~§£ t e 2 ~ ~gr@p BC~ ~ 5 ~:d e C g ~ 6 g t €~~~ s d ~ g g@ @5§~' ~ ~ SE ~~ apgi€ ~ tl5d:ktl 5 ~¢" 8~.! 4 "~ "~ $ gg $ ~ltlt€Epp~2 E StC Fa ~ ~~~ ~ 9 ~yF ~~ ~' ^~~ 26 E i ~~:b Y ~~ _~ y 0 z ~~~ e~ppd 'A es~~i F_F?aF- e83a5 °~ 6c. aFa ~:33 H w w c=i~ w H F Z Q J d U Z Q J Q ~-'_ d W U Z O v g~~A{€{ ~O.B i#€€j ,a.. 9 e ~i p N! ~_ P22E `' CS Q a$ X$~ h F~ a dx ~+V W ~ O ~n\ C O \ f~ ~ / V ~i ~ ~o ~_ ~ U o 0~~; /N ~ /_ U O ~ U L~ ~ C O ~I n_ C~ ~~ U C m ~~ ~U Ev f3 i ~ i , j ,. ~ _ ,~~'- ~ ~ i ~., J ~~ r~ 3~es~ East a M0 W~ N P22 ;: ~; _,~ = r ~ °: IFFF~~~~,'111, U "' Q ~i N ~ ~ ~1 a =: v z J U Z_ U J Q W U Z v v~ o ~ ~~ o~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ° O = Neu U ,~, o ~ v Q W ~ ~~ g~ =c ~~ ~ .E~ LL~ i E~~ ~ :, .a I. ~~ ~ -_ if~le G ~~ I - ~ ,~~ U _ 'I F z . ~ -. ICJ ~ ® Q S E ~ _" _°__"- "-= Ty -- =.W°^`=~" - - `fi'r -- - ------- -__-- ---' ~.~ N~ a . rte--,-- ~`.~/N/7Df113`Y=l ~SNB= ~ ~ ',-^, ''. ~ r_- I ~' ~ - = v I --`~-:-- ~~.~ ~ I Sr ;~ •~., r ~- ~ n " `r^ o ~ ~ C ~ ~=~r~'<z, j ,, ,~_ ,~ r ~~ GO ~~ ~i pp ~ o a~ ~ ~ `r~ , , :? ~ ' ~I F r `f tri j i'~i ~~~ r ~- /~ yr 1 ~ -~ i ~ '~ ~-lp~i ~ r~^ ~ I ______ `~ ___ r _ 11 J~ ~r _' _ _ _~~__~ _Jq~' ~ IQ f-, ~~ a (- 'I 7i,' r ~ \ J, , ,~ r' iii . q ;. rt= ~ _= i , i '"_ - _ ~ ~ j~ i Iii S _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <. ~~'~ I _~~~~~ ~ ° .,~n Illlll ~ 1'f, _ ~, ~ -- ,,, ' n -.~ ,_, _ 7 .. 1 ~~r`l_ Flo--~~~___..~ '~ ___.~~"_ ~ Y~l•~'1\~ h-' ^ i -___ I - ~' V ~g ® .°.~a, •.w .,,.~,...°.., ..,,..~.m.,,.,,.~~. y uewc scut FIRE ACCESS TSB&04~'° "°" a ° ,u ~~ _~. ~ J ~ i~l~s Sovdlem GPdpmia Npmmg \~ ~Tp~n 10881 FooMlll BNd ,Ste A220 Randlo C~npe, CA 91730 lam' PITASSI ARCHITECTS~c ORC 2005-01060 East Rancho Verde Village Rancho Cucamonga, California P230 ,~ _ - ,~. ie i` T H E C I T Y O F Rnmcno CocnMO>vcn Staff Report DATE January 10, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE DRC2006-00916 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS -Review of proposed Housing Incentive Agreement to implement Development Review DRC2005-01060 by modifying certain development standards for the construction of 40 workforce apartment units on vacant property in Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue - APN 0207-254-67 and 68 Related files Development Review DRC2005-01060 This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action SUMMARY The Southern California Housing Corporation has submitted an application requesting approval of an Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65915 to 65918 and Development Code Chapter 17 40 The purpose is to facilitate the construction of 40 new affordable apartment units and related improvements on 1 75 acre of land adjacent to the east side of the Rancho Verde Village apartment complex located at 8837 Grove Avenue The Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement proposes that modifications to specific development standards of the district to be allowed to make the project economically feasible to provide the affordable apartment units The proposed Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is associated with Design Development Review DRC2005-01060 The plans presented for Planning Commission review have been designed with the modified standards identified in the draft Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement The Planning Commission's approval of this project is contingent upon City Council's final approval of the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement BACKGROUND Under State law, cities are required to provide development incentives for the development of affordable housing units within their furisdiction The more affordable the units, the more incentives the City must grant Typically, these incentives include extra density and/or relaxed development standards in exchange for the creation of affordable units However, with this project, the applicant is requesting incentives to relax specific development standards to make the proposed project economically feasible for creating the 40 affordable units The proposed Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement identifies the specific areas where the applicant is requesting that development standards be amended for the project A copy of the draft Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is attached for review The section entitled ~xN-8ir C P231 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-01060-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 2 Operative Provisions identifies the specific development standards to be amended including amendments to the required minimum lot size for the development at the density requested required setbacks from adtacent single-family properties, interior building setback/separation, visitor parking, and perimeter wall height Plans prepared for the protect reflect the modified standards Final approval of the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is subtect to City Council approval If the agreement is approved by the City Counal, the protect can proceed as proposed and approved by the Planning Commission If Council does not approve the agreement, the protect will need to be revised or abandoned ANALYSIS A General The Southern California Housing Corporation is proposing to develop 40 new affordable apartment units and a 10,300-square foot community center/laundry building adtacent to and connected with the existing Rancho Verde Village apartment complex The protect and the existing complex is owned and operated by Southern California Housing Corporation The new units will be located in 2 three-story buildings that have an open courtyard, plus 4-units above the community center Each new unit will have 3-bedrooms and a floor area ranging from approximately 1,100 to 1,300 square feet Covered parking will be provided in the garages (42 spaces) and carports (40 spaces) located against the south and east boundaries of the site in the bwldings with 7 single-car garages each The carports and guest parking spaces are located on the north property line and around the interior of the site B City Attorney Review James Markman, City Attorney, has reviewed and approved the Agreement as to form and content C Design Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, McPhail, and Coleman) on October 31, 2006 Plans prepared for the protect and the Committee review reflected the modified standards The Committee found the protect to be well designed and granted conceptual approval D Grading and Technical Review Committee On November 14, 2006, the Bwldmg and Engineering Departments conceptually approved the protect E Environmental Assessment An Initial Study was prepared for the entire protect and released for public review on December 11, 2006 Based on the findings of the Initial Study, staff determined that the protect could have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact unless reduced to a level of less-than-significant by the implementation mitigation measures Proposed mitigation measures have been included as conditions of approval for the protect Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the protect PUBLIC NOTICE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all the property owners within a 600-foot radius of the protect site to properties to the north, south, east, and west A total of 130 notices were mailed P232 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-01060-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission to adopt the attached Resolution recommending City Council approval of DRC2006-00916, the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement for the East Rancho Verde Village protect Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~. ~ Ja s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT MPD/rlc Attachments Exhibit A -Draft Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement for East Rancho Verde Village Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Housing Incentive Agreement P233 RESOLUTION NO 07-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT DRC2006-00916, TO IMPLEMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060 BY MODIFYING CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 40 WORKFORCE APARTMENT UNITS ON THE VACANT PROPERTY IN MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE EXISTING RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE -APN 0207-254-67 AND 68, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Rentals 1 Pitassi Architects, Inc , on behalf of Southern California Housing Corporation, filed an application for Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement No DRC2005-00916, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 10, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 The subject property of the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is legally described herein 4 A true and correct copy of the proposed Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is attached as Exhibit "A" 5 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 10, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 1 75 acre of the property located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development atthe southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue, and which is presently unimproved, and b The property to the north is developed with single-family homes and zoned Low Density (2-4 units per acre) Residential, the property to the south is zoned General Industrial (Sub Area 1) and is presently used as a railroad right of way, to the east are single-family residences in the Low Density (2-4 units per acre) Residential zone, and the to the west is the existing Rancho Verde Apartment Complex within the Medium High (14-24 units per acre) Residential zoning district, and ~XNIBiT ~ P234 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-02 DRC2006-00916 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 2 c The application to which the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement applies contemplates the construction of 40-workforce housing units and associated improvements, on 1 75 acre of land at above described location which are permitted within the Medium-High Density residential zoning district, and d The proposed design of the new units is a contemporary interpretation of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style that is complementary to the existing complex On January 10, 2007, the Planning Commission approved the protect contingent upon City Council approval of the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement, and e The Agreement proposes modifying certain development standards for the construction of 40 workforce apartment units pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65915-65918 and Development Code Chapter 17 40 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed protect to which the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is associated with is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan in that, if approved, the protect will advance the goal of providing affordable housing units for families within the community, and b That the proposed design for the affordable apartment units and associated improvements is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, in that the new units will complement the appearance of the existing complex, and c That the proposed affordable units will be in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code as modified for specific standards by the subtect Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement associated with this protect, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity The development of apartment units on the subtect site will result new opportunity to improve the neighborhood by eliminating the vacant lot and house that served as an attractive nuisance for unlawful activity 4 A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the protect to which the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement applies, is incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent cudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application 5 This Commission hereby recommends approval of the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement attached to the staff report 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution P235 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-02 DRC2006-00916 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2007 PLANNING C~d1G11~11SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST ~ ~ "' " Jam R Troyer, AICP, Secr tary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of January 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS FL~TCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, MUNOZ, STEWART NOES COMMISSIONERS NONE ABSENT COMMISSIONERS NONE P236 • Y. " _~-7. T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE January 10, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -Review of Site Plan and Building Elevations for 40, three-bedroom, apartment units on 1 75 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue - APN 0207-254-67 and 68 Related file Housing Incentive Agreement for East Rancho Verde Village DRC2006-00916 SUMMARY The Southern California Housing Corporation is proposing to construct 40 new affordable apartment units and a community center/laundry bwiding on approximately 1 75 acre of vacant property adjacent to the east side of the existing Rancho Verde Village apartment complex located at 8837 Grove Avenue In order to meet the desired goal of providing affordable units for families and make the proposed project economically feasible, the project also includes an Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement that requests modifications to the specific development standards described therein The plans presented for Planning Commission review have been designed with the modified standards identified in the draft Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement The Planning Commission's approval of this project will be contingent upon City Council approval of the associated Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Zoning and Density Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) The project density is proposed at 22 8 dwelling units per acre ~Xfl/6/T E P237 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-01060-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 2 B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Modest single-family homes in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - BNSF/MetroLink Line in the zoned General Industrial (Subarea 1) zone, and Single-Family Residential in the City of Ontario East - Modest single-family homes in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing Rancho Verde Apartment complex and mixture of single- and multiple-family development across Grove Avenue in the City of Upland C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Medium-High Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - General Industrial East - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium-High Residential D Site Characteristics The protect site is approximately 1 75 acre in size and largely vacant except for an existing vacant (dilapidated) house that will be removed The site slopes gradually to the southwest E Parkmg Calculations Unrt-Size Parking Ratio -- ~i ~.. Number of Covered Spaces Required - - Number of Covered Spaces ,"- Provided ;, °` 3-Bedroom 2 Spaces Per Unit 80 82' Visitor 1 space per 4 Units 10 7 Totals 90 spaces 89 spaces " 42 s aces m ara es and 40 s aces m car orts - - The three visitor spaces not accounted for in the table above will be provided within the existing complex which has a surplus of 50 spaces ANALYSIS A General The Southern California Housing Corporation is proposing to develop 40 new affordable apartment units and a 10,300 square foot community center/laundry building adtacent to and connected with the existing Rancho Verde Village apartment complex The protect and existing complex is owned and operated by Southern California Housing Corporation A vacant house will be removed from the site to accommodate the proposed protect Access to the protect will be from Grove Avenue, with an emergency access from Sierra Madre Avenue Also included will be new cut-de-sac street improvements to Main Street and Sierra Madre Avenue, which abut the site on the east and north sides, respectively No access to Main Street is proposed P238 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-01060-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 3 The new units will be located in two, 3-story buildings that have an open courtyard, plus four units above the Community Center Each new unit will have three bedrooms and a floor area ranging from approximately 1,100 to 1,300 square feet Covered parking will be provided in garages (42 spaces) and carports (40 spaces) located against the south and east boundaries of the site in buildings with seven single-car garages each The carports and guest parking spaces are located on the north property line and around the interior of the site The design of the new units is a contemporary interpretation of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style compatible with the existing Rancho Verde Village apartment complex However, unlike the design of the existing units, the new bwlding design features clay the hip roofs and trimmed out windows and door openings The exterior walls are clad in stucco typically associated with the proposed style The landscaping and recreational amenities appear to be well distributed around the site Perimeter walls around the protect site will be 8 to 10 feet tall and constructed of slump stone to match existing walls B Design Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, McPhail, Coleman) on October 31, 2006 Plans prepared for the protect and presented to the Commission reflected the modified standards With only minor items to discuss/resolve, the Committee found the architect's responses to be appropriate and moved to grant conceptual approval C Grading and Technical Review Committee The project was reviewed by the Committee on October 31, 2006 At the time, the Committee did not approve the Grading and Drainage Plans pending the submittal of further information The item was reviewed again on November 14, 2006, at which time the outstanding items were resolved to the satisfaction of the Building and Engineering Departments, and the plans were conceptually approved D Environmental Assessment An Initial Study was prepared for the entire protect and released for public review on December 11, 2006 Based on the findings of the Initial Study, staff determined that the protect could have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact unless reduced to a level of less-than-significant by the implementation mitigation measures Areas identified as subfect to potential environmental impacts were in Cultural Resources, Hydrology and Water, Noise, Air Quality (short-term during site preparation), and Geology and Soiis Proposed mitigation measures have been included as conditions of approval for the protect Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the protect E Neighborhood Meeting Two neighborhood meetings to discuss the proposed protect with adfacent residents were held in April 2005 and on June 22, 2006 (six residents attended each meeting) At both meetings, the residents were generally supportive of the protect as they saw the new development as an opportunity to improve the neighborhood by eliminating the vacant lot and house that served as an attractive nuisance for unlawful activity Among the items discussed during the meeting were questions regarding security, exterior lighting, height of perimeter walls, timing for the project, and street improvements A copy of the minutes from the June 22, 2006, meeting is attached P239 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-01060-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 4 PUBLIC NOTICE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within 600-foot radius of the project site A total of 130 notices were mailed Two residents from Main Street contacted staff to review plans and indicate their desires regarding perimeter wall heights and maintenance of wall/graffiti removal from the new wall along their street STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the approval of Development Review DRC2005-01060 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Respectfully submitted, ~~ mes R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT MPD/ma Attachments Exhibit A - Project Plans Exhibit B -Neighborhood Meeting Minutes dated June 22, 2006 Exhibit C -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-01060 P240 RESOLUTION NO 07-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR 40, THREE-BEDROOM APARTMENT UNITS AND A COMMUNITY BUILDING ON 1 75 ACRE OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE EXISTING RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-254-67 AND 68 A Recitals 1 Pete Pitassi Architects, on behalf of Southern California Housing Corporation, filed an application for Development Review DRC2005-01060, the design review of40 affordable apartment units and a community building, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 10th day of January 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 10, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 1 75 acre of land located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue, and b The property to the north is developed with single-family homes and zoned Low Density Residential (2-4 units per acre), the property to the south is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 1) and is presently used as a railroad right-of-way, to the east are single-family residences within the Low Density Residential District (2-4 units per acre), and to the west is the existing Rancho Verde Apartment Complexwithin the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vianity, and ~xH~B~ r ~ P241 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 2 d The applicant proposed the development of 40 affordable apartment units and a community center/laundry building This project is an expansion of the existing Rancho Verde Village apartment complex, hence, the new units will share existing common open space, amenities, and parking Likewise, the existing residents will be able to use the new open space and community budding, and e The project design generally complies with the development standards of the Medium-High District as modified by the proposed Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement as described therein, and amending required minimum lot size for development at the density requested, setbacks from adjacent single-family properties, interior building setback/separation, wsitor parking, and perimeter wall height, and f The design of the new units is a contemporary interpretation of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style that is complementary to the existing complex The exterior design elements for the new apartment units feature claytile hip roofs, trimmed out windows and door openings, and walls clad in stucco that are typically associated with the proposed style Moreover, landscaping and recreational amenities appear to be well distributed around the site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed pro/ect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that the project will advance the goal of providing affordable housing units for families within the community, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, m that the new units will complement the appearance of the existing complex, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each ofthe applicable provisions of the Development Code as modified for specific standards by the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement associated with this project, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity The development of apartment units on the subject site will result in new opportunity to improve the neighborhood by eliminating the vacant lot and house that served as an attractive nuisance for unlawful activity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the P242 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 3 imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (Q that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (n) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Plannmg Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends The site has not been identified as potential location for habitat that is known to support sensitive biological speaes Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannino Department 1) This approval is for the site plan, exterior building design, and landscaping for the 40 affordable apartment units and 10,300 square foot community center/laundry building at the subject site Final approval for the project shall be contingent upon subsequent City Council approval of, and execution thereof, the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement (DRC2006-00913) P243 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 4 2) If the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is approved by the City Council, all plans submitted for plan check shall conform with plans approved by the Design Review Committee on October 31, 2006, and the Planning Commission on January 10, 2007 3) No exterior changes to the design of the project, including exterior materials, shall be permitted without prior City review and approval 4) The design and height of decorative metal fences, gates, railings, and perimeter walls shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval during plan check All decorative exterior metal elements shall be finished with high quality powder coat paint 5) Access from Sierra Madre Avenue shall be limited to emergency use only 6) Property owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of all perimeter walls including the removal of graffiti Engineenng Department 1) Install Reduced Radius Turnarounds with no deviation in accordance with Standard Drawing 113 in Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street a) Finish off the existing sidewalk on Main Street, curb adjacent and 5 feet wide It is acceptable to terminate Sierra Madre sidewalk at the new drive approach on the east side b) Drive approaches shall conform to Standard Drawing 101, Type R Permission to reconstruct existing drive approaches shall be obtained from the affected homeowners and results provided to the City, prior to approval of the public improvement plans Modification of the standard to City Engineer's approval maybe done in order to install the approach within the proposed right-of-way c) If affected homeowners are not willing to have their drive approaches reconstructed, provide additional rights-of-way on the project site sufficient to install said reduced radws turnaround(s) d) If affected homeowners are willing to maintain any additional parkway areas created, install street trees and private landscaping with irrigation Street trees shall be a minimum 15-gallon size and installed per the Street Tree Requirement Form If not, excess parkway areas shall be filled in with cobblestones per Standard Drawing 542 e) Sidewalk is not required south of the existing/reconstructed drive approach on Sierra Madre Avenue P244 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 5 f) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights and signing/striping to the satisfaction of the City Engineer A streetlight at the west end of Main Street shall be located behind the 5-foot curb adjacent sidewalk Provide an 8-foot mast arm g) Drainage facilities shall not be installed to or in Main Street Drain whole project site consistent with the final drainage report and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and away from Main Street h) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one-half foot behind the sidewalk or to the right-of-way if there is no sidewalk Toes of slopes shall be at least one foot behind sidewalks Access to Sierra Madre is for emergency use only There will be no access to Main Street 2) The developer shall install private landscaping to be maintained by the homeowners association on the west side of Sierra Madre a) If the apartment management company is not also taking on the responsibility to maintain the Sierra Madre and Main Street irrigation/landscape improvements, then the adjacent property owners shall be given the choice of maintaining these landscape areas or having hardscape improvements installed (cobble stones) This shall be reflected in the text and sketches sent to adjacent property owners b) Any private landscaping to be installed by the apartment company shall be noted on the revisions to Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street Said private improvements to be installed prior to City acceptance of respective public improvements 3) Provide alternate reduced radius turnaround designs for both Sierra Madre and Main Street in the event that one or more adjacent homeowners do not give permission to reconstruct their drive approaches or in the event that one or more utilities do not grant clearance to vacate Sierra Madre This may mean one or both of the turnarounds will encroach into the project site, so the impacts on parking and grading need to be shown If their written agreement to the concept is obtained prior to Planning Commission, Condition 1 c can be removed 4) Curb for the reduced radius turn-around in Sierra Madre will not fit within the existing 50 foot right-of-way The standard 25-foot radius to the curb face will place the curb onto private property In addition, a perimeter wall exists on the west side of the street, south of the alley Dedicate additional Sierra Madre right-of-way and/or modify existing wall as needed in order to install a standard reduced radius turn- around completely within the public street P245 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2 00 5-0 1 060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 6 5) We are accepting the Preliminary Drainage Report as sufficient for purposes of writing conditions of approval and will not require installation of the Master Plan Storm Drain in 8th Street However, the final drainage study will need to include all Q100 flow currently reaching the new terminus of Sierra Madre, including any flows which may be diverted in the future by the 9th Street MPSD A sump condition is being created, so in the event of blockage in the storm drain, a drainage path for emergency overflow will need to be provided 6) Install a local public storm drain to convey public street flows from the new terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue to the existing outlet facility at the south end of the project site Design the local system to be connected to the future Master Plan Storm Drain Line III-3 in 8~"Street The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by this development, with no fee credit a) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle Q,oo, and emergency overflow shall be provided b) The final drainage report shall determine the existing tributary area for Sierra Madre Avenue and assume full development thereof c) Provide manholes wherever private drainage facilities connect to public storm drains, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 7) Provide a public storm drain easement for the new storm drain and access easements over the project drive aisle for City maintenance vehicles 8) The separate parcels within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to the issuance of building permits The parcel merger application shall include the parcel containing the existing apartment complex or process a Lot Line Adjustment to relocate the existing parcel Ime that passes through Bwlding #3 a) Vacate Sierra Madre right-of-way, subject to City Counal approval which includes, but is not limited to clearances from all utility agencies for that portion of the existing street cul-de-sac adjacent to APN 0207-254-67, poor to lot merger and lot line adjustment 9) A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required forthis project Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County WQMP for new development and redevelopment projects http //www swrcb ca qov/rwgcb8/htlm/sb wgmp html This website provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and printed Adhere to the guidelines and use the templates provided Also, show and label the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the WQMP on the grading plans P246 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 7 Environmental Mitigation Air Quabty 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ' ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements P247 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 8 • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactroe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipmentwhen not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources following appropriate CEQA gwdelines P248 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 9 • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i e plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activrtes • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediatelydroert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes P249 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 10 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by SB&O Inc, (December 5, 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a W QMP, including a prolect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into P250 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 11 the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director and Building Official for review and approval, building plans that demonstrate compliance with the noise attenuation recommendations of the acoustical engineer as contained in the Acoustical Analysis prepared by Davy & Associates, Inc (April 2006), and on file with the Planning Department 2) Construction or grading on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m ,including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Offiaal Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 5) Haul truck deliveries on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings P251 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-01 DRC2005-01060- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION January 10, 2007 Page 12 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2007 PLANNING BY ATTEST ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of January 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS FLETCHER, MACIAS, McPHAIL, MUNOZ, STE~'ART NOES COMMISSIONERS NONE ABSENT COMMISSIONERS NONE P252 '"-'~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~~ - DEPARTMENT _~ ~ ~- STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS (40 UNITS) APPLICANT: PETE PITASSI FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION LOCATED ON 1 75 ACRE VACANT SITE IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE EXISTING RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHERLY LOCATION: TERMINUS OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YDUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-01, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Ttme Ltmits DevelopmenVDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C Stte Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations Comoletion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/-/. -/-/ Protect No DPC2005-01P~,2^53 Completion Uate integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Duector Details shall be included in building plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) t All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across arculation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 1 B feet in depth from back of sidewalk 6 Parking and/or storage of recreational vehicles on this site shall be prohibited 7 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planrnng Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- aroundspace in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the protect 0% - 48-inch box or larger, 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10 ~b - 24-inch box or larger, 80%- 15-gallon, and 0%- 5-gallon 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stal Is 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in _/_/ -/-/ -/-/ -/_/ -/-/ -/-/ -/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- i -/-/- -/-/- Project No DRCZOOS-cP254 Comoletion Date mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterandwaste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (DRC2005-01060) clearly identified on the outside of all plans h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_1_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department K. Slte Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (DRC2005-01060) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Pnor to issuance of budding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and pnor to issuance of budding permits Protect NO Daczoos-o P255 Comolehon Date N. Additional Requirements/Comments Note on title sheet that tenant Improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department if you have any questions about the procedure at (909)477-2710 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City, rf needed P. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 86-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb& Gutter AC Side- Pvmt walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other Sierra Madre X X (f) X X X (e) Main Street X X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) All street improvements to be installed with reduced radius turnaround per City Standard No 13, modified to fit existing right-of-way (f) Remove and replace sidewalk as needed to loin drive approach and terminate in reduced radius turnaround to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 3 Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required -/_/. -/-/ -/_/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- Protect No Dac2oos-oP256 Completion Date ~. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs fvst Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunks 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls S. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdiwsion or prior to the issuance of permits rn the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals The separate parcels contained within the protect boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits A nonrefundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid forthe Construction and Demolition Droersion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of ail wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/- - -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/- - -/-/- -/-/- P257 ~~,,,,,~-~~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District m '~ ~- `- ~ ~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS December 6, 2006 East Rancho Verde Village Between Grove Avenue and Sierra Madre n/o Railroad Apartment Complex DRC2005-01060 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at htto //www ci rancho-cucamonoa ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Droision & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for The Fire Protection water supply must be in accordance to RCFPD Standard 9-8 The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential protects is 400 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150 feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a residential project from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof P258 2 Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwiding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20 feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46 feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fve and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward 3 P259 Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings FSC-11 Hazardous Matenals -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subfect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards P260 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCW D and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reaprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer andlor owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subtect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 P261 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting January 10, 2007 Chairman Stewart called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7 00 p m The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Ciwc Center, 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California Chairman Stewart then led in the pledge of allegiance ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Richard Fletcher, Lou Munoz, Cristine McPhail, Pam Stewart ABSENT Rich Macias (arrived at 7 25) STAFF PRESENT Mike Bell, Deputy Fire Chief, Peter Bryan, Fire Chief, Rebecca Coleman, Office Specialist II, Michael Diaz, Senior Planner, Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, Dan James, Senior Ciwl Engineer, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, James Troyer, Planning Director ...._ ANNOUNCEMENTS ..... APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent), to approve the minutes of December 13, 2006 _.... CONSENT CALENDAR VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ALONG ETIWANDA AVENUE FOR LOT 39 OF TRACT T287IT-CITTC'rT THIS PROJECT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL Motion Moved by McPhail, seconded by 4-0-1 (Macias absent) The Owt Claim w carried by the following vote ~edC~lT'ft-e Consent Calendar as presented ed to the City Council for final action Motion AYES FLETCHER Z, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES NON ABSENT IAS, -carried .. PUBLIC HEARINGS ~B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Exyie~r ~a P262 CORPORATION -Review of Site Plan and Building Elevations for 40, three-Bedroom, apartment units on 1 75 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue -APN 0207-254-67 and 68 Related file Housing Incentive Agreement for East Rancho Verde Village DRC2006-00916 C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT FOR EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE DRC2006-00916 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS -Review of proposed Housing Incentive Agreement to implement Development Review DRC2005-01060 by modifying certain development standards for the construction of 40 workforce apartment units on vacant property in Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue -APN 0207-254-67 & 68 This item will be forwarded to the City Counal for final action Mike Diaz, Senior Planner, presented the staff report He said that two members of the public who live on Main Street commented on the project and expressed a desire for the wall along the east property line to coordinate with their existing wall He said that the City discourages two walls on top of each other and he believes that issue has been addressed He also noted that the Engineering Department has asked for their Condition #8, found on B-70 of the agenda packet be deleted from the Resolution Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if to correct the wall situation if it would regwre the demolition of the existing wall first Mr Diaz replied that the developer is typically required to tear down the existing wall and replace it with the new wall in such a way that there are no gaps and no double walls Charman Stewart opened the public hearing Curtis Dahle, from Pitassi Architects, and representing the applicants, reported that overthe course of 1 and '/z years, they have held two neighborhood meetings and during those meetings they listened to and accommodated them where possible He said they also listened to staff and support their recommendations He said he believes all the parties involved are in agreement with the conditions Chairman Stewart reported that she had read the notes from the neighborhood meeting on June 22, and asked if the concern regarding the wall height on Sierra Madre and the buffer issue with a neighboring home had been resolved Mr Dahle stated that the concerns have been resolved He said the wall height had been lowered considerably from the original proposed height The wall will be 8 feet from the interior side, 6 feet at the north property line and on the east it will be 10 feet from the exterior of the site He reported that the east side of the property will be buffered from the adjacent properties by garages and the north side with carports Bob Leisure, 8745 Sierra Madre Avenue, expressed opposition to the project because of traffic impacts, access to the protect, and because he fears the project will cause his property to have a lower property value Chairman Stewart asked if he had attended any of the neighborhood meetings Mr Lesure stated he never heard about any Planning Corhmission Minutes -2- January 10, 2007 P263 Richard Reese, 8291 Sierra Madre, stated that the public notice for the Planning Commission meeting was the first notice he had received about the protect He expressed opposition for reasons of access, and the reduced height of the barrier wall located on the north side of the property He said he believes reduang the existing wall from 10 feet to 6 feet would impact his neighborhood and would allow gangs to evade police or cause problems in the adjacent neighborhood Larry Campbell, 8734 Sierra Madre Avenue, expressed concerns about holes being knocked into the existing walls and the possibility of more holes being knocked through the new walls He presented some photographs to the Commission He expressed concern about adequate fire protection, the vacant house on the property and related vandalism and activity there He also stated he had not received notice of the protect before receiving the one for this evening's meeting Chairman Stewart stated the vacant house will be demolished Mr Campbell asked why it had not been cleaned up He said it attracts criminal activity Chairman Stewart asked if he believes the trouble with knocking holes in the walls stems from kids in the area Mr Campbell stated that is what he believes Commissioner Macias arrived at 7 25 p m Dustin Huston stated he agrees with the previous speakers and that he said "community reflects aty " He said he believes the protect will increase cnme in the area, that to take down the existing walls would create a privacy issue He said Rancho Cucamonga should not have any more apartments for reasons of security and fire safety and if anything, they should put houses there Bob Barlow, 8733 Sierra Madre Avenue, said he had not received prior notice of the protect, that there is little police presence in the neighborhood now, that the protect would impact the schools and increase a crime problem that already exists Charlie Martinez, 9129 Candlewood, stated he was expressing views on behalf of his father, George Martinez, who lives on Sierra Madre Avenue He thanked Leslie Edwards of Southern California Development Corporation for her help and for listening to their concerns He said he had attended two meetings and appreciated the developerfor modifying their plans forthe cul-de-sac He said he has called the City regarding graffiti on the walls and the problems with the vacant house (vagrancy, dumping, vandalism) He asked for the house to be demolished now and added that he would be glad if the complex was completely sealed off Christine Saunders, 8339 Main Street, stated she had attended the second neighborhood meeting She reported that she did not want the cul-de-sac opened as a thru street and that she was told there would be a high wall and garages separating the protect She concurred with the previous speakers regarding the vandalism and graffiti problems She said the City comes out about once a month to clean the walls of graffiti She said the notice for this meeting is different in that it speaks of family apartments and not low income apartments She said they were told in the meeting that the protect would be a mix of regular and only a few low income apartments which is different than what this notice for tonight's meeting states Chairman Stewart asked the developer to be prepared to clarify of the definitions of low income housing versus affordable housing at the conclusion of the public testimony as well as an explanation about the notiang Planning Commission Minutes -3- January 10, 2007 P264 Elisabeth Tadlow, 8814 Edwin Street, stated she had not been inwted to the community meetings She said she would have attended if she had known She expressed concern about an increase in crime, traffic impacts and graffiti She suggested a park or single-family homes instead of apartments Leslie Edwards, Southern California Development Corporation stated the terms are basically interchangeable terms She said that this is not HUD housing and that the residents for this housing must have an income 60% lower than the median income for the county She said that for a family of 4, it would most likely be an income less than $30,000 per year She said this project provides needed family size units of 3-4 bedrooms that are not common in this area and is an extension of the existing project that will be managed the same She noted that the existing complex has a mix of market rate units with the lower income units Regarding the notices, she said the same mailing labels were used for all the meetings and she could not explain why everyone did not receive the notices for all the meetings Vice Chairman Fletcher asked her if she is aware of the holes in the perimeter walls Ms Edwards stated she did not recall seeing any holes although she was made aware people have hopped over the existing walls at the second community meeting She said they would not be changing the perimeter wall of the existing project except for the east wall that will be removed to extend the complex Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if the existing height is 6 feet or higher Mr Dahle stated that the new wall will be about 3 feet lower but that on the opposite side of the wall it is 6 feet Chairman Stewart noted that the height of the wall is almost 10 feet from the outside measurement Mr Dahle clarified that the new wall is 6 feet in height measured from the exterior and 8 feet high measured from the inside of the site and on the east and south sides it is 8 feet from the interior and 10-11 feet from the adjacent neighborhood He explained the difference is in the grade of the land on either side of the walls Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if the mitigations have been discussed with the residents and if the concerns about the activities of the neighborhood kids in regard to the walls has been addressed Ms Edwards stated that adding the height to the walls in addition to the removal of the vacant house should help this situation She said a good portion of the wall will not be one that could be hopped over because they would be hopping onto the roof of a garage Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if there is a maintenance program to address the holes knocked in the outside perimeter walls as well as take care of the graffiti Ms Edwards stated yes and that they would try to do that immediately Commissioner Macias asked staff to clarify the requirements of the City to provide low income housing and if this is a Redevelopment project James Troyer, Planning Director, stated that the Redevelopment Agency is part of this project and they are regwred to set aside 20% of property tax revenues to subsidize low and moderate income housing Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 10, 2007 P265 Commissioner Macias asked if it is 20% of tax assessed from the site and if there is a need to satisfy a low income housing requirement and if this project provides for that Mr Troyer said it would contribute to our total regwrement set by the State for low income housing goals He said we have not yet reached that requirement Vice Chairman Fletcher said the City is struggling to meet this requirement and that he believes that currently the City is nearly 2500 units short of the regwred goal Commissioner Macias asked if this developer produces market rate projects as well Ms Edwards stated that some of their projects are a mix of market rate and affordable units She said they are non-profit so most of their projects are affordable units She noted that this one is 100% affordable units Commission Macias asked if the majority of the affordable housing units are in-fdl development Ms Edwards stated they are at this point Mr Diaz stated that the access at Sierra Madre and Main Street will not provide through street access He said at Sierra Madre there will be a gate that will be used solely for fire safety access Vice Chairman Fletcher asked how that gate will be opened and closed Mr Diaz stated they will use a knox box He added that both streets will also have aesthetic improvements as a result of this project He noted that vacant house will be removed soon as well as the vacant lot eliminating the attractive nuisance that is there now He said the wall heights vary but that they wdl connect to the existing walls without any gaps He said he believed the 8-10 foot wall heights were satisfactory to the neighbors He added that the property owner is responsible for cleanup of graffiti and the holes in the walls and is stated on page 4 of the resolution Commissioner Macias asked how many other developments does this developer have in the City and are they also low income housing Mr Diaz reported there are 5 according to the developer and that there is low income housing in all of them Chief Peter Bryan, City Fire District, explained in regard to emergency access that on streets longer than 600 feet, a secondary access is required but that it can be a gate He said the main gates in gated communities have electronic controls for police and fire access He said the others can be controlled for emergency access as well He said that more fire inspections of multi-family residential projects will occur in the future for fire safety He said they would also be working with the police on graffiti issues He said the Fire Department will be there regularly He reported that this phase of the project is different in that it will require sprinklers and safety measures above and beyond what has been previously regwred Chairman Stewart closed the public hearing She then commented that Southern California Development is in charge of managing and maintaining the property She asked if they take care of both sides of the walls and if they perform proactive inspections Ms Edwards stated yes, they both build and manage the property She said they have maintenance people on the property who are constantly checking the property Planning Commission Minutes -5- January 10, 2007 P266 Chairman Stewart said she drove by the existing project and she noted there is a great deal of graffiti She said since Ms Edwards has indicated they are responsible for the cleanup, she was curious as to how those walls would get cleaned up She asked how citizens who live in the surrounding neighborhood would get help with that Ms Edwards said they could go to the manager on site and if they do not get results then they could call the corporate office and tell the supervisor so that they could address that immediately Commissioner McPhail asked Ms Edwards to comment on the screening and behavior control of the prospective residents Ms Edwards said they must fall within the income range, they undergo criminal screenng, they must sign drug free addendums and they will be evicted if they are found to be using drugs or in criminal actively Commissioner McPhail asked ~f there have been many problems with people being evicted Ms Edwards said their problems have not been too severe compared to other units Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, stated that there is an affordable housing crisis in California He said the State has asked cities and Redevelopment Agenaes to 1) set aside 20% of all tax collected in the project areas for affordable housing He noted that Rancho Cucamonga has been successful in this and has significant funds to use for affordable housing and 2) State law regwres cities to provide a certain amount of housing for moderate, low and very low incomes, and 3) according to State law, the City can only use certain criteria of the application on which to base a deasion, only the architecture, design and site plan portions of the project can be used He noted that the deasion cannot be based upon the income of people, that we must accomplish our housing elemenUredevelopment goals regwred by the State and that we cannot discriminate Vice Chairman Fletcher asked for an explanation of the consequences if those goals are not met Mr Ennis said that those unfulfilled goals roll over and become additions to the next penod of review for the City which puts the City further behind He said the City is precluded from down-zoning any residential properties to a lower density if we cannot accomplish our housing goals and it dust becomes more difficult to meet the other goals and needs of the community of the City unless this is accomplished Commissioner Munoz asked if there is a financial penalty Mr Ennis responded that the penalty suffered by our Redevelopment Agency could be substantial Commissioner Munoz stated that these goals are required and are part of our General Plan which is reviewed by the State every 5 years and if the goals are not met, the finanaal penalty could be accrued Commissioner Maaas asked if the goals are not met, could the City be sued by housing advocates Mr Ennis affirmed that is true and that the law is written in such a way that those litigation attempts are favored and if they are successful the City could suffer significant legal costs from defending such cases Commissioner Munoz then summarized his thoughts regarding the opposition voiced about the project He said the new development would improve the existing property, the City must meet these housing requirements and they must try to meet the stated goals He said that being poor Planning Commission Minutes -6- January 10, 2007 P267 does not mean someone is part of the criminal element, many low income families would like a decent place to live including those in Rancho Cucamonga He said the project is an improvement over what is there today He said he supports the protect Commissioner McPhail agreed and said that evidence shows that management programs such as those of Southern California Housing can make a difference in a neighborhood She said she had been involved with a protect in Montclair where the tenant screening and site improvements made a difference She said because someone needs a little help does not mean they are criminals She moved for approval of the protect Vice Chairman Fletcher noted that Southern California Development Corporation has an excellent reputation for taking over problematic properties and improving them He said the existing problems on this site are largely due to the attractive nwsance situation He said this is an in-fill protect that is an extension of the existing affordable housing protect He said this one includes a community center portion that may alleviate some of the problems there He added that regarding impacts on the schools, he noted that many schools in Rancho Cucamonga have declining enrollments because people cannot afford the housing in Rancho He commented that for every development that comes through this process, the school district is notified He commented that if there is a lack of police presence then the residents can call the police He said the City graffiti hotline number is 481-7999 He added that there is a State mandate in force to prowde affordable housing but in Rancho that is becoming more difficult because of success, growth and rising property values It is difficult for developers to pencil it out and to make any profit He said that he believes this protect will benefit and improve the neighborhood Commissioner Macias said this is clearly a land use decision and voiced his support Chairman Stewart commented that she agrees with all of her colleagues and that because she has an extensive background in law enforcement, she could say that there is not necessarily a connection between low income and crime She said this will be an improvement to the area with new landscapes, lighting, walls, buildings, additional fire protection and people She said if there are problems, call the police She said they do not like lots of calls for service and if they are able to identify the problems they will come out to the neighborhood and work with the residents toward resolution She added that the applicant has an on site manager to handle maintenance issues and that if that does not work they can contact their main offices herein Rancho Cucamonga She said ~t is also a time to have more open discussion of the neighborhood residents Commissioner Munoz clarified that the motion is for both B and C along with the environmental assessments Motion Moved by McPhail, seconded by Macas, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-01060 and to issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and to recommend approval of Housing Incentive Agreement DRC2006- 00916 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action Motion carried by the following vote AYES FLETCHER, MACIAS, MUNOZ, McPHAiL, STEWART NOES NONE ABSENT NONE -carried • • + D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT180 WEINBERGER - A request to subdivide 9 9 acres of land into 13 lots i ry Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located south treet and east of EastAvenue-APN 0225-191-09 and 17 Relatedf~ movalPermitDRC2006-00309 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negatived of environmental impacts for consideration Planning Commission M~plrie~ -7- January 10, 2007 .,~-\, k-~.- _ ENVIRONMENTAL ,, INFORMATION FORM ~' (Part I -Initial Study) C/ry of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or pant clearly using mk Use the tab key to move from one Ime to the neM Ime f P/annmg Dmsron (9a9) 477-27W P268 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the' prroposed project so~that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, andt Guidelines;. th`e' California Environinental~r Quality~~ Act;• and' the City's_, Rules~~and~,~ Procedures to Implement CEQA:. It is inip'ortarit that the inforrrlatiori'requ%sted tin.this~:~s- a~ ~li~cationbe~ rovide`d'infull`.'"'~~";_~, :~; ,_Y,,o-:,4`~,,,', -~~ ,.<.~,-(_r•;..,,,,, =,...- `'~;,r., ~ _ ,', PP P. ,~i'~,';'`ti ~„Gr, f_ .~;~,~i.`raG+x`$~(~j'w"„r ;?e,~;' ;, 1',r;;._- ..sf~!~~F~;x~t~~~~~ ~~~ ~ c" ~ tu'.Y, :{~~'-~•~ Wa~ ^. ~ ~: e ,•y YPy,~_,,'t~li~_ 'Rt. l~aa .~~ yry.~ a.;~ ., .amt. ~o- ~ , ;._, ° x; ~ 1;~+"~t 1!._.. ,~_ S ~ Cs. W~%'rx 't,SE. ~ C : _.. r '~ , t.."4'''..-%' .Ki _~+, ... ~ _ ~~~ _ , ~ ~; ; Y~*,. rd ~,~ , a." ~iv.~. ' Upon,review=of the completed. Initial~StudyPartwl~and the, development' application;~;Y additional~informatlon-such as, but not;hmtted~to, traffic; noise, biological; drainage, andx~~; geological,reports may be required> The~pFdject application will not be d`e"erimed complete.;" unl~es`s the.identifed'speclal studies%reports"are sutimitted,foF review and accepted ash„ , a a. a wy a .,.., 7T r !a '~b^ h f h w ~ , .n ~ + o-a - -; r.^ , rcomplete xand~adequate`;~~The~pmrojecttapplication wi~l not,tiescheduled,,for Corrimittees,:r,.;„ ,,, ,,. revtew unless allvregwred°.reports~are>submitted and"deemed complete for.staff~~to'~'• ,,prepare-thi: Initial`Study;Partal'as"required'tiy~CEQA:~~~ln:addition.to-the filing fee,~tfi~er'~ ~r~i 'JaT,F'<- -~!° a:+x c~': "J.°: ,:m~'-~~..~..> ... x._ ~._~ Y - .~. ~ ,rg.r-~„L_: sy ~ u- ~applicantwill~tie responsible„to'pay,.or~retmburse"the City; itssag`ents; officers; and%or~ n e,n_ i{°+n,.~-' - ~ -, Fe. ~yz.'~~ ^z..: `F~-,"e.:M .t •i . ., _ to --~, - .,,,• ~corisulta~rits for; all-"costs:°#oc iFi~e~~preparatitin,~t review;', a`nalysis;r'recoinmendations;".'' x -~ ~.-i3 ., s .. ~,.~- r~r-.11_ ~ ~. ~mitigatiorispetc.';ofariy-special"studies=orreports~~";;='~~111~~a~;~=1_` "^3+`~~' --- °~'~'";~+ _~ ~ .ry,. rr= ~' ` d. w "'_.i- i•'.u, rte.-+s~ 4.~ r . -~!„~~ ,,i"f.. ~ i1 e-` ~ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the respons/blllty of the applicant to ensure that the app6cahon Is complete at the bme of subm/ttal, C/ty staN wd! not be available to peAorm work regwred to provide missmg fnformahon Appllcatlon Number for the protect to wh/ch th/s iwm pertains ProlectTitle East Rancho Verde V1 Name 8 Address of protect owner(s) Southern California Housing Development Corp. 9065 Haven Avenue, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name 8 Address o/developer or pro/act sponsor Southern California Housing Development Corp. 9065 Haven Avenue, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~XHI.BIT" I \PLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTERUnibal SNdy Part1 docPage 1 of 10 Rev 3!17/04 ContactPersonBAddress Lesley Edwards, Project Manager, Southern California Housing Development Corp., 9065 Haven Avenue, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name 8 Address ofperson preparing this form (d d~f(erent from above) Curtis Dahle, AIA, Pitassi Architects, Inc., 8439 White Oak Avenue, Suite 105, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number (909) 980-1361 Information md~cated by an asterisk (') ~s not regwred of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Prowde a full scale (8-?2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and mdroate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of s~gn~ficant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) ProfectLocat~on(descnbe)~ Vacant. lot east of existing apartment complex at 8837 Grove Ave.; south of Sierra Madre Ave. terminus; north of BNSF/Metrolink Rail Line; and west of Main Street terminus. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) 207-254-67 and 207-254-68 '5) GrossS~teArea(adsq ft) 1 .754 acres/76,390 s.f. 'S) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) 1.754 acres/76,390 s.f. 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect fhe proled site (attach add~t~onal sheet if necessary) None. I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER~nNal SNdy Part'I docPage 2 of 10 Rev 3/17!04 P269 P270 8) Include a descnpGon of all permds which wdl be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully implement the protect Street Vacation Approval, Lot Line Adjustment, Development Review Approval, Grading Permit, and Building Permit. 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the project rncludmg rnformahon on topography, sort stabr6ty, plants and animals, mature trees, trams and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (rncludmg age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described M addrhon, cite alt sources o(mformabon (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studres, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studres) The Site cons>sts of two parcels of land - one vacant lot, and one lot with an existing single family residence - and an incomplete asphalt paved cut-de-sac street. The topographic conditions are generally flat, with a 1~ slope north to south. The soil consists of gravelly silty sand with some pebbles and cobbles (Geotechnical Report #LP06056 by Landmark Consultants, Inc., dated April 20, 2005). The vegetation on the vacant lot is native dry grasses and weeds with no trees present. The existing residence property has minimal landscaping (mostly native dry grasses) and only two mature trees with no heritage value. The existing residence is approximately 40 years old and has no historic or cultural significance. 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Gte all sources ofrn(ormatron (books, pubtrshed repots and oral history) None. I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTE R\I nihal sWdy Part1 docPage 3 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 11) Describe any Horse sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they wJl affect proposed uses Minor traffic noise from Grove Avenue aooroximately BDO ft. wes P271 of project site, and from Eighth Street 150 ft, south of site. Intermittant noise from regularly scheduled train traffic on Metrolink Railroad Line due south of site. 12) Describe the proposed pro/ect m detail This should provide an adequate descnpGon of the stein terms o(ulbmafe use that will result from the proposed protect Indicate i( there are proposed phases (or development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additions/sheet(s) r( necessary Development of 40 three-bedroom affordable apartments and a community/recreation building on a 1.754 acre site adjoining an existing 248 unit affordable apartment complex on Grove Avenue. The vehicular access drive which loops around the existing apartment complex will be modified by elim~.nating the portion between the new and existing sites, and extending it around three sides of the new project (thereby providing a continuous vehicular access drive around the two adjoined sites). Parking for the new apartments will be accommodated by providing detached garage builcltngs along the south and east property lines, and free-standing carports on the opposite side of the drive aisle. The area between the new and existing apartrnent buildings will be converted to landscaped recreation space for use by the entire apartment complex. 13) Describe the sun-ound~ng propeRies, including information on plants and aroma/s and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, Irontage, setback, rear yard, e[c ) The properties to the north and east of the project site are one-story single family residences. To the south is the railroad right-of-way and vacant property zoned for light industrial use. To the west is the existing apartment complex with three story buildings (Parking @ ground floor level; two levels of apartments above; finish grade on three sides of each apt. bldg raised to first floor of apt, units) 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale, or character o(the surrounding general area o(the project ~ No. I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Inihal Study Part1 docPage 4 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 15) Indicate the type ofshort-term and long-term noise to be generated, rcludrng source and amount How wrll these norse levels af/ect ad/acent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed Short term moderate levels of noise will be generated from grading and construction activities. Hours of construction will be P272 limited to that allowed by City Ordinance. No long term noise anticipated from new apartment project. `16) tndicateproposedremovalsand/or replacements of mature orscenrctrees proposed removal of two existing mature trees (no scenic or heritage value determined) on existing residential site. Project will include installation of °~ new canopy and accent trees throughout site, as required by ' City Ordinance. 17) Indicate any bodes of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams None. Site drainage surface flows to eventually reach City storm drain system. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estrmates) For further clanficatron, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct a[ 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) 1 0, 2 4 0 Peak use (gal/Day) 2 0, 4 8 0 b CommerciaUlnd (gaUday/ac) Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ^ Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed rnd~cate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment Afor usage estrmates) For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct at 987-2591. a Residential (gal/day) 7 `00 b CommercraUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units 4 0 Detached (mdreate range o(parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (mdreate whether units are rental or for sale units) Low-income rental units. I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Ini4al Study Partt docPage 5 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 P273 21) Anticipated range of sale paces and/or rents Sale Pace(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ 422/mo, to $1,048/mo 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type Unit Type 'A' 3 Bedroom Unit Type 'B' 3 Bedroom Unit Type 'C' 3 Bedroom Unit Type 'D' 3 Bedroom 23) Indicate anbapated household s¢e by unit type Maximum S persons/3 Bedroom Apartment . 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be res~dmg w~thm the pro/ect Contact the appropriate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment B a Elementary 5_18 b Junior High. 2_1 c Sen~w High 3_4 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type o(use(s) and mayor function(s) of commercial, mdustnal or mstituhonal uses 26) Total floor area of commercial, mdustnal, or institutional uses by type 27) Indicate hours o/operation 28) Number of employees Total Maximum Shift Time of Maximum Shift I \PLANNING\FINALU=ORMS\COUNTERUnibal SNdy Partt docPage 6 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 P274 29) Provide breakdown of anficipatedlob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate of hue for each classification (attach additional sheet rf necessary) 30) Estimation of the number ofworkers to be hued that currently reside in the Crty '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the soume, type, and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Arr Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to detemtine there a6il~ty to provide adequate service to the proposed prolect7 If so, please rndreate their response Yes. Adequate services can be provided to this project. 33) In the known history of this property, has then; been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s7 Examples o(hazardousand/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesbcrdes and herbicrdes,luels,orls,solvents, andotherflammablel~quidsandgases Alsonofeundergroundstorageofanyoftheabove Please Irst the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rl known No known history of use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials on subject property. I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERUniftal Sfudy Part1 docPage 7 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 34) VVII the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, ordischarge ofhazardous and/ortoxicmatenals, including but not l~mifed to those examples l~sfed abovev If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, a/ong with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans No. P275 I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and Information presented are true and correct tot he best o/ my knowledge and belief 1 further understand that additional information maybe regwred to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of 1 Date ,(i_~9~,~i~~J' I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTERllni6al Study Part1 docPage 8 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 Title• Project Architect ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family Multl-Famlly Neighborhood Commerclal General Commerclal Office Professlonal Instdufional/Govemment Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (dlstrlbutlon) Sewer Flows Single-Famlly Multl-Family General Commerclal Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (dlstrlbutlon) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Instltutlonal/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source Cucamonga Valley Water D/stnct Englneenng & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 P276 I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Ini6al Sludy Part1 docPage 9 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 P277 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Dlstrlcts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Swte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Swte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etlwanda 6061 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 a, I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 10 of 10 Rev 3/77/04 P278 HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962 5 (copy attached) to notify the City as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California (OPR) I have also been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of the date of executing this Statement, OPR has not yet compiled and distrubted a list of hazardous waste sites as regwred by said Section 65962.5. I am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development application has been submitted is not within any area specified in said Section 65962.5 as a hazardous waste site. I declare under penalty of penury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: ~"y ~ O rJ Applicant ~fG+F~M ~ ~ /uv~~ ~alt~n- C.G~ MEMORANDUM DATE: August 13, 1990 TO: Applicants FROM: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCE SITES Effective July 1, 1987, Government Code Section 65962 5 requires each applicant for any development project to consult the State list of Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites Based upon this list (available from the Planning Division) the applicant is required to submit a signed statement to the City of Rancho Cucamonga indicating vvhetherthe project is located on a site which is included on the list before the City accepts the application as complete If the project site is listed by the State as a hazardous waste or substance site, the applicant must fully describe the nature of the hazard and the potential environmental impacts on the Initial Study, Part I. Attached is a standard statement for the applicant to sign. The State list of Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites may be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division offices, located at 10500 Civic Center Dnve. Attachment: Statement Form P279 'j .~V' 4Ed' i o0~.~~4<., y~~J~~. v„t~ -L..,~ ~f~tic ~i~.~1,c __~( ~' off, ~~ -~;~1...;~ ; = ~ =~ :~~`' f' ' C1ft%~v-riiir~ri 7rlrvr~rt`rr`_~ ~. I ~ Y i~ r4 ~ P P I O '" ~ ~` O = ~~"`~ nrr~^ ~''~= q`~.',, yam, :..G~~ wO Yy/ dl ~ ~ 4~1 '~ 41 ~} $..bLY1 ~- Jf •V ~J EI'1. Q.'r ~~ ~.-p ~~'l~&~~ l,_..E A 4"ice' d 4 d : ~ ~r , '~ ~° ~ . ; t r T ~~ ~-- ~- ~ .~5 k-. .~....- qw `r ~L'~ ~",'~r `+ c,3,w~ ~ _ _, ~ g~ s __ ~~` UlL__Ir~ ~' Y_~ -ti~,e~ ~ 14' ~ g~_Kl n - 1 c. , . ,' ~r -~-. I: ,~~ ~~ , "r a ~~~ 'J y p .m, ~ ~ ~ >. ~.,"~`~~" 1~ rv1 11 ! I 4. 0 t~ ~ i' ~ ° .,, ~ ;~ i u ,~.~ Lt X o e j o 1 1 ~ a n, tk - ~% t 0 00 ~~Q ~- i ? 4~~~-,dal 1 `t~_.i i` ~~ ~• "~ .~, ~4~'~ --`fit ~, .,~ ~, 9 -~ r .~ \~~ ~ ~' ~ b r r~~ _ t b 1 y' t ~ ~' ~'~ .~ ,1 Y W a ' ~ ( . ~ ~. rd ~ ~ A 1 ~ -i 1"'~. ~ > .11-01 L~+~ ~ V' ~7 ~~:5 ~ o cw~ .-. 9 v_ _ _ _ _. d ~ ~ p i r', t i r? .,^ ~ !~" ~, ~ ~' 1 '~ ,~.-~ {}~~ P280 i #p~° 1' ~~ O ~ 1 ~~r o + ,~ 'per. f) ~ I j O t ~ ~___.'/ ~ _ I i ,_ ~-.~.c-~.--. -r Windows Ltve Local ll~Windows Live Local [Use current map view] ~, po~•iered by Virtual Earth BE'W What, Business name or category where Address, aty, or other place Page 1 of 1 N 00 http //local hve coin/ 2/14/2006 P282 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Protect File Development Review DRC2005-01060 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -Review of Site Plan and building elevations for 40 three-bedroom apartment units on 1 75 acre of land in the Medium High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue - APN 0207-254-67 and 68 Related Files• DRC2006-00916 for Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement 3. Description of Protect The Southern California Housing Corporation is proposing to develop 40 new affordable apartment units and a 10,300 square foot community center/laundry building adtaceni to the east side of its existing Rancho Verde Village apartment complex The protect is intended to tie in with the existing complex owned and operated by Southern California Housing Corporation located immediately west of the subtect site The existing complex is a combination of market rate and affordable units A vacant house will be removed from the site to accommodate the proposed protect Access to the protect will be from Grove Avenue, with an emergency access from Sierra Madre Avenue Also included will be new cul-de-sac street improvements to Main Street and Sierra Madre Avenue which abut the site on the east and north sides, respectively The new units will be located in two, 3-story buildings that have an open courtyard, plus 4 units above the Community Center Each new unit will have 3 bedrooms and a floor area ranging from approximately 1,100 to 1,300 square feet Required parking for the protect is 90 spaces (10 for visitors) and a total of 89 parking spaces are provided as follows 42 in detached garages, 40 in carports, and 7 for required guest parking spaces The garage spaces will be located against the south and east boundaries of the site in buildings with 7 single-car garages each The carports and guest parking spaces are located on the north property line and around the interior of the site Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement (hereafter the Agreement) Under State law, cities are required to provide development incentives for the development of affordable housing units within its turisdiction Typically, these incentives included extra density and/or relaxed development standards in exchange for the creation of affordable units However, with this protect, the applicant is requesting incentives to relax specific development standards to make the proposed protect economically feasible for creating the 40 affordable units The applicant has submitted an application requesting City approval of a proposed Affordable Housing Incentive agreement (hereafter the agreement) that identifies the specific areas where development standards will be amended for the protect The agreement addresses required minimum lot size for development at the density requested, setbacks from adtacent single-family properties, interior building setback/separation, visitor parking, and perimeter wall height The proposed agreement will be considered by the City Council If the agreement is approved by the City Council, the protect will be able to proceed as proposed If the Council does not approve the agreement, the protect will have to be revised or abandoned P283 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01060 -RANCHO VERDE APARTMENTS Page 2 4 Protect Sponsor's Name and Address Southern California Housing Development Corporation 9065 Haven Avenue, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5 General Plan Designation Medium High Residential (14-24 Units per Acre) 6 Zoning Medium High (MH) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the protect's surroundmgs)• The protect site consists of an open field adtacent to the east side of the existing apartment complex, with an existing vacant house and trees that will be removed To the north and east are single-family residences within the Low (L) Density Residential District, and to the immediate south is the railroad line for the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) that is also shared by Metrolink commuter rail line (hereafter BNSF/Metrolink) Further south, across 8th Street, are single-family residences in the City of Ontario Lead Agency Name and Address• City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number Michael Diaz (909)477-2750 10 Other agenaes whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G Rev 5/24/06 P284 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Than SigmM1Cam Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Fptenuaoy SigniLCant w¢n MingaLOn Tnan SignJU ant No Impact Incorppraled Impact Impact ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, byte prolect propgne)lt-MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By Reviewed Date ~ 2' 4 - 0 6 irate ~Z ' '~ ~~lO ~ ~ Rev 5/24/06 P285 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Tian Signd¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g I p~en~ially SigmLCam wpm Mmgauon Tnan Signil¢ant No Impact InWr Oratetl Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments. a) There are no significant vistas within or adfacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The protect site consists of a small open field adfacent to the east side of the existing 3-story apartment complex and surrounded by modest single-family residences to the north and east and BNSF/Metrolink rail line The design of the new units will be a contemporary interpretation of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style intended to complement (not replicate) the design of the existing apartment complex As such, the protect will improve the current visual quality of the area Design review is required prior to final approval The City standards require the developer to underground the existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract Rev 5/24/06 P286 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Srgnnc~ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenually Srgnd¢ant wnn Mrfrgauon Than Srgnnc~ant No Imoad Incorporated Imoact Irtgad c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, O O O (/) which, because of their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the edge of the City and is surrounded generally by residential development and a major east-west rail line The nearest agricultural use is approximately 3 miles to the southeast of the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR DUALITY Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and Rev 5/24/06 P287 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE Page 6 Less Than S,gmLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g a^~an+a~ly Sign,hcam w,m Mniga'ion man S,gmbcant No Imoad Incorporatetl (mead ImWCt State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCA~MD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAoMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time Rev 5/24/06 P288 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Sipnd¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pc~enaally sigm4cant With Mltlgatmn Than signelcant No Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt fs carried over to adfacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Tfmmg may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 requirements- . Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW~CB]) dally to reduce PM,g emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 98 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates In Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant If they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-signficant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide Increase In emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the Clty Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates In Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be Implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters Rev 5/24/06 P289 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than signd¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Po,en~auv SigniLCam wpm Mai9a,ion rnan Sgm6cam No Impact Incor oratetl Imoac, Impact 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnppmg After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site adtoins residences and is located approximately 1/4 mile southwest from the Los Amigos Elementary School, a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on npanan habdat O O O (/) or other sensitive natural commurnty identfied m local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means Rev 5/24/06 P290 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE Page 9 Lass T"an Sign,hcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Ppfa"..anY SIgnILC2pl w"" M,agaOpn Than Sgn,LCant No Im act Incorporatetl Impact Impap d) Interfere substantially wdh the movement of any natroe O O O (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wfldlife corrfdors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (/) protecting bfological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provfsfons of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments a) The protect site fs located fn a developed area primarily surrounded by residential development Although vacant, the site appears to have been previously disturbed including the development of an existing residence that is currently vacant and that will be removed for the protect No significant vegetation exists on the site According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site fs not within an area of sensitive bfological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect fs surrounded by urbanized land uses and fs consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located fn an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not fn conflict with any local ordinance The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhfbft IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ Rev 5/24/06 P291 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE Page 10 Less Than Sigmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g Pptanually &gntl¢anl With Mwgatmn Than Si9mhcant No ImDdcf Inco oratetl Impact ImpdQ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those Interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider estabhshmg provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point- • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-Influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The Rev 5/24/06 P292 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than SigniOCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially sigmxcant weh Mingaoon Than SigniLCant No Impact InCOrpOrdtetl m act Impact protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full- time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction on a portion of the site, surrounding developments, and probable annual disking for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Healih and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated Rev 5/24/06 P293 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE Page 12 Less Than SipniM1Cam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g POtennally Significant wuh Mmgaupn Than Signu cant NO Impact incOrPOtatetl Impact moad 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would fhe pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, Inlury, or death involving I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 II) Strong seismic ground shakings () () () (/) Ili) Seismic-related ground fiailure, including () () () (/) liquefaction iv) Landslldes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soli erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that Is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined In Table () () () (/) 18-t-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and it Is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor Is It in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The subtect site Is approximately 1/2 Red HIII Fault, passes approximately 1/2 mile to the north of the site and, the Cucamonga Fault Zone is approximately 4 1/2 miles to the north These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes The San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to M,„ 7 5 earthquakes, Is approximately 11 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 16 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code well ensure that geologic Impacts are less-than-significant b) The proposed protect well require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area Is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area Rev 5/24/06 P294 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Sigrnhcanf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgnihcant wnn Mitigation Than Sigmhcant No Impact incoryoratetl Impact Impact as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) dally to reduce PMig emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 51-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically considered rapidly permeable with slow to very slow runoff and slight erosion hazard No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school Rev 5/24/06 P295 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 less Tnan Signd¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pp,anbally Sgn,hcanf wnn MiOgation Tnan SigmLCant No Impact Inror oratetl Impact Im act d) Be located on a site which is Included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the wcindy of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair Implementation of or physically Interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death Involving wlldland fires, Including where wildlands are adtaceni to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wlldlands~ Comments a) The protect does not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that Is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City Is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The Clty has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The Clty participates In a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other In the state The City Is In the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) Los Amigos Elementary School Is located approximately 1/4 mile of the protect site at the northwest corner of Ninth Street and Baker Avenue The construction of residential units on the subtect site will not create obtectionable odors No adverse Impacts are anticipated Rev 5/24/06 P296 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 less Than Sigm6cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenoally Signtlmant With Miogaoon Than sigmacant Np f'tpad OCOIpOfatBtl mpaC~ mDdCt d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is approximately 2 2 miles northwest of the Ontario International Airport, but not directly in the flight path of its runways No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Cty's westerly limits No impact is antCipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two paints of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-sitev d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) Rev 5/24/06 P297 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Lass Than Signilicam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pctemiany Sgmhcant with Mrtiga;mn Than SgnJ¢ant No Imoact Incomoratetl Iaroac' Inroad g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The protect Is designed to connect to the existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving oft-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires a NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) To comply with the NPDES, the protect construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by SB&O, Inc (December 5, 2005) that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non- Rev 5124/06 P298 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Signilicam Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Pmenually SgmLCam wnn MOipation rnan Signtliwnt No Impact Incplp0lalatl Impact Impetl structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Actwdies 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum• a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WIMP) prepared by SB&O, Inc (December 5, 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Rev 5/24/06 P299 Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE Page 18 Less Tnan SiBnihcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pplen"ally Sgni6cant w.m Miapafion Tnan Signdmant N° Impact ncplpplaletl Impact Impact b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from the groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river Ail runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water duality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WIMP shall identify the structural and non- Rev 5/24/06 P300 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Signilicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Ppfep~~ally sipmecam wpm Mmpauon rnan Signd¢ant Np Impact IpCO~pprafEd mpaCl Impact structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g) If residential include this sentence The protect site Is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse Impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City and spreading grounds both within and north of the Cdy 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the pro/ect a) Physically divide an established community O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (Including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habdat conservation plan O O O (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) Surrounding the site are 3-story apartments to the west, single-family homes on modest sized lots to the north and east, and the BNSF/MetroLlnk Ilne on the south The proposed development of 40 apartment units associated and adjacent to the existing complex will be Rev 5/24/06 P301 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 less Than Sgmhcam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Ppfa"uauy $IgnlflCanf w"" Mitigation '"an SlgnJicam No Impact nWf Ofafatl Impact Impact consistent and compatible with the development of the surrounding area No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The land use designation for the site Is Medium High (MH) Density and appropriate for the proposed development The proposed protect is also conslstent with the General Plan and does not interfere wiih any policies for environmental protection As such, no Impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not wlthln an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect Is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there Is no Impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there Is no impact 11 NOISE Would the pro/ect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in O (/) O ( ) excess of standards established In the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () (/) ( ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels In the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect Rev 5/24/06 P302 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Lass Than signil¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pptenually significant W,ih Mn,gaoon Than signihcam No Impact Incor oratatl Impact Impact e) For a protect located within an auport land use plan or, O O O (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The protect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards as indicated by General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out However, the southern boundary of the site is located adtacent to the BNSF/Metrolink rail line that lies between the site and 8th Street According to the Noise Study (Davy &Assoaates, Inc April 24, 2006) prepared for the protect, noise sources impacting the protect site was traffic on 8th Street, I-10 Freeway, and the BSNF/Metrolink rail line The railroad line carries Metrolink and freight trains In order to meet the City noise standards and reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels, the Noise Study makes recommendations for mitigating freeway noise impacts and railroad noise impacts, which are referenced in the mitigation measure below 1) Pnor to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director and Building Official for review and approval, building plans that demonstrate compliance with the noise attenuation recommendations of the acoustical engineer as contained m the Acoustical Analysis prepared by Davy &Assoaates, Inc (April 2006), and on file with the Planning Department. b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations Moreover, the existing rail line will be approximately 125-feet from the nearest apartment unit within the protect As such, no significant impacts are anticpated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied m Development Code Section 1702120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Offiaal Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offiaal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels Rev 5/24/06 P303 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Tttan Signmcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Ppfantially Sgntlmanf Wnn MiOgafion Than SgmLCant No Impact Inco oratetl Impact Impact exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measure shall then be regwred 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings e) The site is not located within an airport land use Plan and approximately 2 2 miles northwest of the Ontario International Airport, and offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments a) The protect will result in the development of 40 housing units on the subtect site and a moderate increase in the local resident population However, the proposed development provides affordable apartment units will be consistent with the underlying residential land use designation for the site and surrounding residential development on adtoining properties to the north east and west of the site No significant impacts are anticipated b) The protect wdl not result m the displacement of substantial numbers of existing housing units Only one vacant house will be removed from a portion of the site to be replaced Rev 5/24/06 P304 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Sibmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pn(e"..any Signtl¢ant w,.h Mmgation Tha^ SigniLCant No ITpaLt nCn( n(a~etl ToaL~ TpaLt with 40 affordable apartments for families With the development of new apartments on the site, there will be no adverse impact to housing within the City c) The matority of the site is undeveloped No significant impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated wrfh the provision of new or physically altered governmental faal~ties, need for new or physically altered governmental facrl~ties, the construction of which could cause srgnihcant environmental impacts, m order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections () (/) () ( ) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks O O O (/) e) Other public facihties~ O O O (/) Comments a) The site, located adtaceni to the existing apartment complex at Grove Avenue and 8th Street, will be served by a Fire Station 172 located approximately 2 miles from the protect site located near the intersection of San Bernardino Road and Archibald Avenue According to the Flre Department documents, the subtect site and area is currently outside the District's adopted goal of a 4-minute travel time response area However, the recently adopted Fire Department 2005 Strategic Plan addresses this issue and has as one of its goals to relocate Station 172 so as to eliminate any deficiencies in response times for the site and nearby areas In the meantime, all new units will have fire sprinklers and be constructed in accordance with Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes b) Police protection and routine patrols of the site and surrounding areas is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga substation of the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department The eventual construction of new apartment units on the eastern portion of the existing Rancho Verde apartment complex will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the area in which the protect is located A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is Bear Gulch Park, located a little over 1-mile northeast from the protect site on Arrow Highway In addition, a future park is proposed fora 3 36 acre parcel near the northeast corner of Ninth Street and Madrone Avenue The development of this new park is anticipated between 3 to 5 years, when the City has allocated sufficient funds for the protect As such, the existing and anticipated park along with the on-site recreational Rev 5/24/06 P305 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than SigmLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°'en''a'lY 9gnibcant w"" Mnige'ion Tban Sign/¢ant Np Impact Inco,ppretetl Impart Impap amenities will provide open space and recreational needs of the new residents of the apartments As a standard condition of approval, the developer will also be requued to pay Park Development Fees Thus, no significant impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga well increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has opened a new library (2006) within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center adding approximately 23,000 square feet, which exceeds the protected need of 15,500 square feet at City build-out 14 RECREATION Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and O O O (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or O O O (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is Bear Gulch Park, located a little over 1-mile from the protect site Although, the development of 40 apartment units will result in a slight potential for increased use of public parks or other recreational facilities within the City, the protect will not adversely impact parks or recreational facilities In addition, the protect will provide on-site recreational amenities that will directly benefit the residents of the new apartments As indicated above, a standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees for the new units and help off-set the costs of on-going park improvements in the City No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above Rev 5/24/06 P306 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Signd,cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Poiennally Signdmant wnh Mmgauon Than Signtl¢ant ND mDaa OCOlDDla~etl TDdLt R,DdL( 15 TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial m O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system Q e , result in a substantial increase m either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design () () () (/) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result m inadequate parking capaaty~ O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area As part of the protect, the developer of the apartments will also be required to install street improvements (e g , curb, gutter, and sidewalk) adtacent to the protect that will improve roadway conditions Based on the Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model, the estimated traffic generation rate expected from the proposed apartment protect was calculated at 244 Average Daily Trips (ADT) According to the Traffic Engineering Department, Grove Avenue is classified as a secondary arterial with a maximum build out capacity of 20,000 Average Daily Trips (ADT) The traffic generated by the 40 units will not exceed capacity Level of Service (LOS) at the nearby intersections (Grove Avenue and Ninth Street at Sierra Madre Avenue) is considered to be and remain at LOS C or better As such, the proposed protect will be consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated and not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at nearby intersections Finally, the protect is subtect to the Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation Therefore, no impacts are anticipated b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each apartment unit will generate an average of 67 two-way peak hour trips daily As such, the total trips generated for all 40 apartments will be 26 8 two-way peak hour trips, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail uses, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The Rev 5/24/06 P307 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than S,gn,6cant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Po~em,aoy signdicam wnn Miogaoon Than sgrnhcant No m act ncorpOrB~etl Impact Impact protect site is in an area that is largely developed with all street improvements According the Traffic Engineering Department, the protect will not negatively impact the LOS standards on adtacent arterials No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 2 2 miles northwest of the Ontario International Airport, the site Is offset from the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect Is in an area that Is steadily being developed As a part of the apartment protect, new street Improvements (e g , roadway, curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street well be required The protect design does not Include any sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or farming uses that would present a conflict or hazard with the proposed changes In the land use designation and subsequent development of apartments on a portion of the overall site The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are antiapated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access Emergency fire access to the new apartments will be from the Improved Sierra Madre Avenue roadway No impacts are anticipated f) The protect will have adequate on-site parking In compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and well, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect well be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the pro/ect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's soled waste disposal needs Rev 5/24/06 P308 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less Tnan SiBniLCant less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources pP g Potewally Sgmhcant With Maipation Tgan Significant No Im aot Incorperatetl Impact Impact g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to soled waste Comments a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency ai the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant d) The protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water Dlstrlct sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated Rev 5/24/06 P309 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pofem,ally Sgmhcant wnh Miagation Than Sgnihcant No Im act Incorporatetl Impact Impact 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the eftects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future profects)~ c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ether directly or indirectly Comments ' a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, pnme farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Cdnsiderations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact, proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study Rev 5/24/06 P310 Initial Study for DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 identified potentially significant impacts assoaated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) Rev 5/24/06 P311 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01060 -EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE Page 30 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant epyironmental effects would occur Applicant's Signatu Print Name and Date (~CJ/0~4 Rev 5/24/06 P312 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mrt~gated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review m accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Protect File No.: Development Review DRC2005-01060 Public Review Period Closes: January 10, 2007 Protect Name: Project Applicant• Southern California Housing Development Corporation Protect Location (also see attached map)• Located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue -APN 0207-254-67 and 68 Protect Description• DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060 -Review of Site Plan and building elevations for 40 three-bedroom apartment units on 1 75 acre of land in the Medium High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue -APN 0207-254-67 and 68 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding. The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be requued. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included m the attached Initial Study. The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Dnve (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period January 10 2007 Date of Determination P313 RESOLUTION NO Id 7 07 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT DRC2006-00916, TO IMPLEMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-01060 BY MODIFYING CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 40-WORKFORCE APARTMENT UNITS ON THE VACANT PROPERTY IN MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE EXISTING RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTAT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE - APN 0207-254-67 AND 68, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 Pitassi Architects, Inc , on behalf of Southern California Housing Corporation, filed an application for Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement No DRC2005-00916, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is referred to as "the application " 2 On February 21, 2007, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 The subject property of the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is legally described herein 4 A true and correct copy of the proposed Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is attached as Exhibit "A" 5 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Councl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on February 21, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 1 75 acres of the property located immediately east of the existing Rancho Verde Village multiple-family residential development at the southerly terminus of Sierra Madre Avenue, and which is presently unimproved, and b The property to the north is developed with single-family homes and zoned Low Density (2-4 units per acre) Residential, the property immediately to the south is zoned General Industrial (Sub Area 1), and is presently used as a railroad right of way, to the east are single-family residences in the Low Density (2-4 units per acre) Residential zone, and the to the west is the existing Rancho Verde Apartment Complex within the Medium-High (14-24 units per acre) Residential zoning district, and P314 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2006-00916 -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING CORPORATION February 21, 2007 Page 2 c The application to which the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement applies contemplates the construction of 40-workforce housing units and associated improvements, on 1 75 acres of land at above described location which are permitted within the Medium-High Density residential zoning district, and d The proposed design of the new units is a contemporary interpretation of the Spanish/Mediterranean architectural style that is complementary to the existing complex On January 10, 2007, the Planning Commission approved the prolect contingent upon City Council approval of the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement, and e The Agreement proposes modifying certain development standards for the construction of 40-workforce apartment units pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65915-65918 and Development Code Chapter 17 40 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed prolect to which the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement is associated with is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that, if approved, the prolect will advance the goal of providing affordable housing units for families within the community, and b That the proposed design for the affordable apartment units and associated improvements is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, in that the new units will complement the appearance of the existing complex, and c That the proposed affordable units will be in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code except as modified for specific standards by the subject Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement for the associated project, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity The development of apartment units on the subject site will result new opportunity to improve the neighborhood by eliminating the unsightly vacant lot and abandoned house which has been the setting for undesirable impacts to the adjacent neighborhood 4 A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project to which the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement applies, is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council, and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application 5 This City Council hereby approves the Affordable Housing Incentive Agreement attached to the staff report 6 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution P315 HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT THIS HOUSING INCENTIVE AGREEMENT rs dated for identification purposes as of _ 200_, and is by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a public body, corporate and polrtic (the "Cit}~') and THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Owner") (City and Owner are sometimes referred to herein individually as a "Part}' and collectively as the "Parties"). RECITALS A The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and Owner entered uito that certain Affordable Housing Agreement dated as of June 28, 2005, as amended by that certain Fust Amendment to Affordable Housing Agreement dated as of Mazch 9, 2006 (as amended, the "AHA") Among other things, the AHA provides for Agency financial assistance to Owner to aid m acgmsrtion of certain real property (the "Site") descnbed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, construction of 40 three-bedroom apartments as well as amenities including a community center, logging paths and a hardcourt play area to serve larger families (col]ectively, the "Improvements") and operation of those Improvements to provide rental housing for families of very low, ]ow and moderate income wrthrn the City The Site and Improvements constitute a protect commonly lmown as East Rancho Verde Village ("East Rancho Verde Vrllage" or "Prot ect") Housing Incentive Agreement EXHIBIT A This document is exempt from the SPACE AEOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE payment of a recording fee pursuant to Govt Code§27383 P316 ,$ Owner cutrently owns and operates a 248-unit affordable multifamily apartment community adJacent to and west of the Stte commonly known as Rancho Verde Village, described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto (" Rancho Verde Vtllage") C The Ctty has adopted Chapter 17 40 of the Development Code (the "Affordable Housing Ordinance") to implement Sections 65915 and 65917 of the Cahfonua Govenunent Code, to facilitate the development of affordable housing and to tmplement the goals, obJechves and policies of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan D. Pursuant to applicable provisions of the AHA, a Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restncttve Covenants between the Agency and the Owner (the "Regulatory Agreement") and an Operation and Maintenance Agreement between the Agency and the Owner (the "O&M Agreement") were recorded on July 22, 2005 as instrument Nos 2005-0530600 and 2005-0530601, respectively, of Official Records of San Bernardino County, California The Regulatory Agreement restncts rental of 19 of the 40 apartment units m the Protect to "very low income households," as defined in Section 17 40 20 A of the Affordable Houstng Ordinance and an additional 13 untts for occupancy by "lower income households," as defined therein The Regulatory Agreement also restncts the rents which can be charged by Owner to qualifying tenants who will occupy the Pioject, by requiring that all apartments to the Protect shall be rented at an "affordable rent," as defined m Section 17 40 020 of the Affordable Housing Ordinance E, Under paragraph 3 1 of the Regulatory Agreement, the term thereof is "m perpetuity," but in the event that a term "in perpetuity" should be determined to be m violation of any state or federal law, then the term of the Regulatory Agreement expires July 21, 3004 (a term of 99 yeazs following recordation) F lit order to construct all of the Improvements on the Stte so that the same maybe operated to provide affordable housing to the tenants identified m the Regulatory Agreement, Owner has requested that the Crty grant certain incentives to the Protect including a reduction m 'Site development standazds and a modtfication of the requirements of the City's Development Code which are applied to the review and approval of the hmprovements The grant of such incentives is necessary to snake the Project economically feasible and to enable construction of the Protect. G The unit sizes and number ofbedrooms of apartments m East Rancho Verde Village targeted for rental to very low income households and low income households as restricted m the Regtilatory Agreement are as follows. Number of Apartments Averaee Square Footaee of Auartment Number of Bedrooms Very Low Income Households 19 1084 3 Lower Income Households 13 ] 084 3 Housing Incentive Agreement P317 Consequently, 80% of the 40 apartineiit units to be constructed in East Rancho Verde Village qualify as "Target Unrts" under the Affordable Housing Ordinance, enabling the Project to qualify for a density bonus and tliree incentives thereunder Based on rts finding of the necessity therefore, by tlus Housing Incentive Agreement the City has approved reductions and modifications to the Development Code as applied to the Improvements, as are specified herein H Although Owner will own and operate Rancho Verde Village and East Rancho Verde Vtllage as two separate and distinct projects, because they are contiguous Owner has also requested that certain amemhes be shared between the two communities, mcludmg ingress and egress over Rancho Verde Vtllage for restdents of East Rancho Verde Vtllage, use by the restdents of Rancho Verde Vtllage of the conmmmty room uid other amemhes constructed on East Rancho Verde Village, and use by the restdents of East Rancho Verde Vtllage of certain amemhes constructed wrtlun Rancho Verde Vtllage, mcludmg guest parking spaces located on Rancho Verde Vtllage I Ctty and Owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations and restrictions set forth in this Housing Incentive Agreement touch and concern the Site m that the Owner's legal interest m the Site and the Project rs rendered less valuable thereby The Crty and the Owner hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants touch and concern the Site by enhancing and Increasing the enjoyment and use of the Protect by persons and families of lower income and very low income, who are the intended beneficianes of such covenants, reservations and restrictions, and by furthering the public policies for which this Housing Incentive Agreement is adopted Further, the parties hereby agree that such covenants, reservations and restrictions benefit all other real property located wrtlun the Crty OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, Ctty and the Owner hereby agree as follows 1. Reduced and Modified Standards PertaimnQ to Development of East Rancho Verde Village City agrees that pursuant to the application of Section 17 40 040 B of the Affordable Housing Ordinance, the following incentives may be incorporated into the final site plan and ancillary and associated plans (grading, landscaping, etc) for East Rancho Verde Vtllage submitted by Owner to the City for development review (a) Location of buildings of various heights shall be subject to approval during the Development Review process, but, notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, three-story aparhnent buildings shall be allowed to be located a nummum of 53 feet from the east and north property lines of East Rancho Verde Village, measured to the face of the closest patio/balcony of such building Housing Incentive Agreement P318 (b) Garages, carports, trash enclosures and other unprovements which might be constructed as a part of the East Rancho Verde Vi]]age project shall be pernntted to be conshucted with n zero setback fiom the north, east and south property fines of the East Rancho Verde Village property, subject to appioval of final location dunng the Development Review process (c) Height, materials and design of the perimeter wall proposed for the south, east and portions of the north propeiy fine of East Rancho Verde Village shall be sublect to review and approval dunng the Development Review process, but, notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the height of the perimeter walls located on the south and east property fines may be up to, but may not exceed, a maxunum of 1 I feet, measured from the finished grade at the interior side of the wall, which forms a part of the garage buildings located on the property lines, and the height of the perimeter wall at the north property fine maybe up to, but may not exceed, a maxunum of 8 feet }ugh, measured from finished grade at the interior side of the wall (d) The City agrees that the following items, which are available as incentives under Section 17 40 040 B(])(a) of the Affordable Housing Ordinance, shall be applied dunng the Development Review process for the East Rancho Verde Village protect, which shall be peimitted variances from those same restrictions as currently contained m the Development Code of the City: (i) The mimmum building setback from a drive aisle shall be not less than 12 feet, (u) The nummum building setback from the curb of a drive aisle or other paved area to the face of a patio or balcony wall shall be not less than 6 feet, (iii) The mimmum setback from the face of a patio or balcony wall to the nearest portion of any carport shall be not less than 6 feet, (iv) The mimmum width of landscaped area between patio wall and sidewalk shall be not less than 2 feet, (v) The mimmum separation from building to building for atwo-story and a tliree-story structure shall be not less than 30 feet, (vi) The mmunum separation from building to patio wall or balcony may be not less than 20 feet, and froin patio wall or balcony to patio wall or balcony shall be not less than 14 feet, (vu) The mimmum number ofwasher/dryer facilities shall be calculated at not less than one (1) washer and one (1) dryer for every six (6) aparnnent amts, and Housing Incentive Agreement P319 (vu) The minimum number of trees required to landscape the East Rancho Verde Vtllage project shall be not less than twenty-five (25) trees per gross acre (e) Although the area within East Rancho Verde Vtllage totals less than the 5- acre minimtun noted m the Optional Development Standards, because of the opeiation of East Rancho Verde Vtllage to conjunction with the Rancho Verde Village coirununity, and because the two projects will contain m excess of 13 acres, construction of the East Rancho Verde Village project will be permitted on the Srte, which is currently zoned Medmm-High Residential 2 Ingress and Egress. Upon approval of Development Review of the Project, the Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use attached hereto as Exlubrt "C" (the "Rectprocal Easement Agreement") shall be recorded providing, governing and controlling the~omt ingress and egress for residents of Rancho Verde Vrllage and East Rancho Verde Village over each respective protect and Ioint use of the community facilities located on the two projects mcludnig the community center and recreational amenities (tot lot and hardcourt play area) located on East Rancho Verde Village and swimming pools, tot lot, guest parking spaces, leasing office and logging path located on Rancho Verde Vtllage. The area subject to the reciprocal ingress and egress agreement is depicted on Ex}ubrt "C" to the Rectprocal Easement Agreement, and the community center and related recreational amenities are deptcted on Exhibit "D" to the Rectprocal Easement Agreement. 3 Recreational Amenities. Because some recreational facilities in both Rancho Verde Vtllage and East Rancho Verde Vtllage will be used by restdents ofboth communities, consideration and tabulation of required amemttes shall be determined dunng review of the Protect as if both Rancho Verde Village and East Rancho Verde Vtllage were one protect, items will be permitted to be duplicated between East Rancho Verde Village and Rancho Verde Village to achieve overall compliance with the Development Code 4 Completion and Occunancv. A schedule of completion and occupancy of the apartment units in East Rancho Verde Village targeted for occupancy by very low income households and low income household is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by reference 5. Recitals The Recitals are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced and enforceable as any other provision of this Agreement. 6 Bmdme Effect of Agreement The Owner and the City hereby declare their specific uitent that the covenants, reservations and restnctions contained wttlun this Housing Incentive Agreement shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Owner's successors and assigns m title or interest to the Protect. Owner agrees that this Housing Incentive Agreement shall be recorded to subject the Protect and the Srte to the covenants, reservations and restnctrons set forth herein. Each and every contract, deed, regulatory agreement or other instrument hereinafter executed, covenng or conve}nng the Project, Housrng Incentive Agreement P320 the Srte or any portion thereof shall conclusively to be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations and restnctions expressed m this Housing Incentive Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth m such contract, deed or other instrument 7 Relationshrn of Parties It is understood that the contractual relatronslup between the City and Owner rs such that the Owner is an independent party and rs not the agent of the City and is not to be considered as an agent of the Crty for any purpose whatsoever 8 Regulatory Agreement In addition to the requirements of this Housing Incentive Agreement, the Owner shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the Regulatory Agreement and O&,M Agreement with the Agency 9. Term of Agreement The term of this Housing Incentive Agreement shall commence on the date of execution hereof by the City and shall expire concurrently with expiration of the Regulatory Agreement Thrs Housing Incentive Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated automatically rf Owner does not obtain a certificate of occupancy for all of the Improvements wttlun three (3) years from the effectrve date hereof 10. Indemmfication. Owner agrees to tnderrurify, defend and ho]d Ctty and its e]ected officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from liability for damage or clauns for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Owner or those of its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees or other persons acting on its behalf which relate to the Project. Owner agrees to mdemmfy and shall defend Crty and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Owner's activities m connection with the Project with legal counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City Tlus rndemmfication provision applies to all damages and clams the operations referred to m this Housing Incentive Agreement regardless of whether or not the Ctty prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Project Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision shall not apply to any such claims which arise out of, or by reason of, the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Ctty, its elected officials, agents and employees 11. Non-Liability of City Officials, Employees and Agents No member, official, employee, or agent of the City shall be personally liable to the Owner or any permitted successor- m-interest of the Owner m the event of default or breach by the Crty or the Agency under this Housing Incentive Agreement or for any amount which may become due to the Owner, its successors or under any obligation under the terms of this Housing Incentive Agreement 12 Amendments Tlus Housing Incentive Agreement maybe amended or canceled, m who]e or m part, only by mutual written consent of the Parties and then m the manner provided for m the Ordinances of the Crty Housing Incenttve Agreement P321 13 AdmmistraUve Modtfications. Minor conflicts resulting from the strict uiterpretation of the application of the City's development regulations with this Housing Incentive Agreement maybe modified admmistratrvely by the Ctty Plattner 14 Enforcement, hi the event of a default under the provisions of this Housing hicenhve Agreement by Owner, City shall give written notice to Owner (or rts successor) at the address of the Protect, and by registered or certified marl addressed to the address stated herein, and tf such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the Crty within thirty (30) days after such nottce is given, or if not corrected wrthut such reasonable lime as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot reasonably be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within sard 30 days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by Owner), then City may, wtthout further nonce, declare a default hereunder and ttiay bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the operation of this Housing Incentive Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive iehef against any violation by Owner of any provision of this Housing Incentive Agreement or apply for such other relief as maybe appropriate. After completion of the Protect pursuant to the terms of this Housrng Incentive Agreement, any default may alternatively be enforced as any normal vtolatton of the standards and provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Accordingly, the following penalty is specifically included as part of this Housing hncentive Agreement "It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnershp, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Housrng Incentive Agreement Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Housrng Incentive Agreement by failing to comply with any of rts regmreinents shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or by unpnsonment not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and unpnsorunent Each such person, firm, partnership or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Housrng Incentive Agreement is corrirnrtted, continued or penmtted by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, and shall be punishable therefore as herein provided " 1 ~. Event of Default. Owner shall be in default under this Housing Incentive Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events of conditions (a) If a material warranty, representation or statement is made or furnished by Owner to City and is false or proved to have been knowingly false m any material respect when it was made, (b) If a findntg and detenximation is made by City following an annual review, upon the basis of substantial evidence that Owner has not complied m good faith with any inatenal terms and condrtioiis hereof, after notice and opportunity to cure, or Rousing Incentive Agreement P322 (c) A breach by Owner of any of the provtstons of terms hereof, after nottce and opportunity to cure as provtded heret 16 No Waiver of Remedies Ctty does not waive any claim of defect m performance by Owner tf on penodtc review Ctty does not enforce or tennmate this Houstng Incentive Agreement, Nonperformance by Owner shall not Ue excused because performance by Owner of the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, dtfficult or expensive or because of a failure of any thud party or entity, other than City or the Agency All other remedies at law or m egmty which are not otherwise provtded herein or in City's regulations govenung housing incentive agreements are available to the Parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach hereof No watver by Ctty of any breach or default of Owner under this Houstng Incentive Agreement shall be deemed to be a watver by Ctty of any other subsequent breach or default hereunder either of the same provision or any different provision hereof. 17 Rt~hts of Lenders under this Aereetnettt. Should Owner place or cause to be placed any encumbrance or Iten on the Project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary ("Lender") of said encumbrance or hen, including, but not hmrted to, mortgages, shall have the nght at any time dunng the term hereof and the existence of said encumbrance or hen to (a) Do any act or thing required of Owner hereunder, and any such act or tlttng done or performed by Lender shall be as effective as tf done by Owner itself, (b) Realize on the secunty afforded by the encumbrance or hen by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded to law or to equity or by the secunty document evidencing the encumbrance or hen (hereinafter referred to as the "trust deed"); (c) Transfer, convey or assign the title of Owner to the Project to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order of pursuant to a power of sale contained to a trust deed, and (d) Acgmre and succeed to the interest of Owner by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained m a trust deed The Ctty agrees that the terms of tlus Houstng hzcenttve Agreement are subordinate to auy such financing instrument and shall execute from time to time any and al] documentation reasonably requested by Owner or Lender to effect such subordination 18 Notice to Lender Ctty shall give wnttett nonce of any Owner default or breach hey eunder to Lender and afford Lender the opportunity after servtce of the nottce to (a) Cure the breach or default wttkun sixty (60) days after servtce of said nonce, where the default can be cured by the payment of money Housing Incentive Agreement 8 P323 (b) Cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days after service of said notice, where the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and can be cured witliin that time, or (c) Cure the breach or default in such reasonable tune as may be required where something other than payment of money rs required to cure the breach or default and cannot reasonably be performed within sixty (60) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default are commenced withtn a 60-day penod after service of said notice of default on Lender by City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender to completoon 19 Action by Lender Notwithstanding any other provision of this Housing Incentive Agreement, a Lender may forestall any action by Crty for a breach or default under the terms hereof by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance by order of court or under a power of sale contained m the instrument creating the encumbrance or hen. The proceedings shall not, however, forestall any such action by the City for the default or breach by Owner unless• (a) They are commenced within sixty (60) days after service on Lender of the notice descnbed heremabove, (b) They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursued m the manner required by law to completion, and (c) Lender keeps and performs all of the temis, covenants and conditions of this Housing Incentive Agreement regmiuig the payment or expenditure of money by Owner until the foreclosure pioceedmgs are complete or are discharged by redemption, satisfaction or payment 20 Rent Control In consideration for the hmmtatrons herein provided, City agrees that it shall not, dunng the term of this Housing Incentive Agreement, take any action, the effect of which will be to control, determine or affect the rents for those ]ow income rental units located m the Project, except as otherwise provided herein Enforcement of the Regulatory Agreement and/or the O&M Agreement by the Ciry and/or the Agency shall be specifically permitted and reserved to the City and the Agency, as applicable. 21 Notice Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Housrng Incentive Agreement shall be provided by certified marl, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such address ns may be later specified by the parties hereto Owner The Southern California Housrng Development Corporation 9065 Haven Avenue, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfonia 91730 Attn President Housrng Incentive Agreement P324 City' Crty of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 CIVIC Center Dnve P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Califonua 91730 22 Attorneys' Fees Tn any proceedings ansmg from the enforcement hereof or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover Its costs and Its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred dunng the proceeding as may be fixed within the discretion of the court. 23 Bmdme Effect Thls Housing hncentive Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof shall inure to, the respective parties hereto and then legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, wherever the context requires or admits 24. Applicable Law This Housing Incentive Agreement shall be construed m accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Callfomia 25. Partial Invahdlty If any provisions hereof shall be deemed to be mvahd, Illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceabllrty of the remaining provlslons hereof shall not m any way be affected or Impaired thereby 26 Recordation. Tlus Housing Incentive Agreement shall, at the expense of Owner, be recorded In the Official Records of the County Recorder of the San Bemardmo County IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Housing Incentive Agreement shall be effective on the date it Is signed by the Crty (the "effective date" hereof) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated , 200_ By _ Name Title ATTEST City Clerk By _ Name [signatures continue on following page) Housing Incentive Agreement 1 ~ P325 Approval as to Form Clty Attorney By _ Name THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Caltfomta nonprofit public benefit corporation Dated• , 200_ By. _ Name Title. Housing Incentive Agreement 11 P326 EXHHIBIT "A" [legal description of East Rancho Verde Village] Housing Incentive Agreement P327 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1 8819 Sierra Madre Avenue That portion of Lot 29 in Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to Map of Cucamonga Lands, as per Map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows. beginning 695.96 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Lot, thence South 474.09 feet to the North Ime at and Santa Fe Ra(Iroad right of way; thence Easterly along said right of way to the East Ime of lot 29, thence North to the Northeast corner, thence West to the point of beginning Excepting therefrom that portion lying West of the Southerly extension of the West line of Sierra Madre Avenue and excepting the North 97.01 feet and excepting the South 240 feet thereof A-1 P328 Parcel 2' 8839 Sierra Madre Avenue PARCEL 1: The South 240 feet of that portion of Lot 29, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the Mep of Cucamonga Lands, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Coun[y of San Bernardino, State of California, as per Map recorded In Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, m the Office of the County Recorder of said County, lying Easterly of the Southerly prolongation of the Westerly line of Sierra Madre Avenue, as said Avenue is shown on the Maps of Eureka Gardens, Tract No. 1829, es per Plat recorded m Book 28, Page 20, of Maps, Records of said County PARCEL 2• Anon-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and across that portion of Lot 29, Section 9, Townshlp 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, lying within the Southerly extension of Sierra Madre Avenue, es said Avenue is shown on the Map of the Eureka Gardens Tract No 1829, as per Plat recorded in Book 28, Page 20 of Maps, Records of said County Excepting therefrom the South 240 feet A-2 P329 EXHIBIT "B" [legal description of Rancho Verde Village] Housing Incentive Agreement P330 EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF TRACT MAP NO 12091, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 177 AT PAGES 175 THROUGH 178 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY P331 EXHIBIT "C" [Reciprocal Easement Agreement] Housing Inceahve Agreement P332 Recording Requested By -- and -- And When Recorded Matl To The Southern California Housing Development Corporation 9065 Haven Avenue, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn. Executive Director SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER`S USE DECLARATION OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND COMMON USE THIS DECLARATION OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND COMMON USE (the "Declazatron") is dated as of , 200_ and is made on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions RECITALS A The undersigned ("Declarant") is the owner of two adjacent parcels of real property located m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Cahforma On one of the parcels, Declarant currently owns and operates a 248-umt affordable housing apartment complex commonly known as Rancho Verde Vrllage (sometimes referred to herein as "Parcel 1" or "Rancho Verde Vrllage"), which rs descnbed more specifically on Exlubrt "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference Declarant also owns the adjacent parcel located rmrnedrately east of and contiguous to Rancho Verde Vrllage (wluch real property is sometrmes referred to herein as "Parcel 2," "East Rancho Verde Village" or the "Site"), descnbed more specrfically on Exlubrt "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 are sometimes referred to herein mdrvidually as a "Parcel" and collectively as the "Parcels " B Declazant intends to develop and construct forty (40) 3-bedroom apartment units to form East Rancho Verde Village, which will be managed and operated as an apartment cornmuinty providing affordable housing for families of very low, low and moderate income Declaratron of Remprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P333 C Under the terms of that certain Affordable Housing Agreement dated June 28, 2005 between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") and Declazant, as atnended (the "Affordable Houstng Agreement") relating to acgtnsrtton of, financing for, and construction and use of Improvements on Parcel 2, Declarant has agreed to maintain and operate Rancho Verde Village and East Rancho Verde Village as two sepazate and distinct apartment commumttes. Declazant has also agreed to certain restnctions on use and operation of East Rancho Verde Village which are contained m t11e Regulatory Agreement and Declazation of Restncttve Covenants between the Agency and Declarant and in the Operation and Matntenance Agreement between the Agency and Declarant, both of which are dated July 6, 2005 and which were recorded on 7uly 22, 2005 as Document Nos 2005-0530600 and 2005-0530601, respectively, of the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California. D Declarant and the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Cit}~') have entered into that certain Housing Incentive Agreement dated as of , 200_ The Housing Incentive Agreement confirms certain Incentives to Declarant m the development of East Rancho Verde Village granted by the Ctty under the provisions of Chapter 17 40 010, et seq (the "Affordable Housing Ordinance") of the Ordinances of the City This Declaration Is executed by Declazant in satisfaction of applicable executory provisions of the Housing Incentive Agreement E Although Declarant will provide emergency access to East Rancho Verde Village from Sierra Madre Avenue (at which location fire and other emergency access will be provided to both East Rancho Verde Village and Rancho Verde Village), on a day-to-day basis the residents of East Rancho Verde Village can only gam access to their apartment units by dnvmg across existing dnve aisles wrtlun Rancho Verde Village. F Declarant is constructing certain recreational amemties as a part of East Rancho Verde Vtllage, including a community center, a tot lot and a hazdcourt play area, which amemties will also be made available for use to the residents of Rancho Verde Village Additionally, certain amenities located on the Rancho Verde Village property, that is, swimming pools, a tot lot, guest parking spaces, the leasing office, and the Jogging path, will be made available for use to the residents of East Rancho Verde Village G ht order to guazanty access by the East Rancho Verde Vtllage residents to their apartment units and to confirm reciprocal easements for the use of dnveways and dnve aisles on both East Rancho Verde Vtllage and Rancho Verde Vtllage which provide ingress and egress to and from both Parcels, and to confirm the use of amenities on both Parcels by the residents of each, Declarant desires to subJect the Pazcels to the easements descnbed herein for the benefit of the present and future owners of each of the Parcels and their respective tenants and occupants and their guests and invitees DeclaraGOn of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P334 OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, m consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the mutual covenants and conditions set forth in this Declaration and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Declarant hereby declares that the Parcels shall be Held, conveyed, encumbered, leased, occupied or otherwise used and transferred subject to the i eciprocal rights and easements created in this Declaration 1 Access. Ineress and Egress Easement Each of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 owned by Declarant shall have appurtenant to that Parcel a nonexclusive, perpetual easement for pedestrian, pedestrian vehicle and light truck access, ingress, egress and travel over and across that Parcel in favor of the other Parcel, covering those portions of the Parcels depicted on the attached Exhibit "C" (the common driveway area depicted on Exlubrt "C" is referred to herein as the "Driveway" or the "Driveway Easement Area") Additionally, Parcel 2 shall have appurtenant to that Pazcel anon-exclusive, perpetual easement over Parcel 1 for the tenants and occupants of Parcel 2 to use guest pazkmg spaces located on Parcel 1 (tlie "Guest Pazking Easement") The easement rights granted under this Section 1 are to be strictly interpreted and, except as is specifically provided by the Guest Parlang Easement, are not intended to, and do not, confer the right of the residents of a Parcel to park on the other Pazcel The easements described herein are appurtenant to each Parcel, and each Parcel is both bene5tted and burdened thereby These easements aze for the benefit and enjoyment of the owner of each Pazcel and of all occupants thereof and their respective employees, agents, customers and guests, invitees, heirs, successors and assigns. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, however, use of such easements, the Driveway Easement Area on each Parcel and the area on Parcel 1 subject to the Guest Parking Easement shall be subject to reasonable rules, regulations and restrictions as provided herein. The owner of each Parcel may make any subsurface use of that portion of a Driveway Easement Area located on that owner's Parcel which does not unreasonably interfere with the surface use of the Driveway Easement Area Joint Use o(Amenrhes. (a) A community room will be located within Building No 3 to be constructed by Declarant as a part of the unprovements consrituting East Rancho Verde Village, situated generally m the area shown on Exlubrt "D" hereto (the "Coimnunrty Room") and Declarant will also construct a tot lot and hardcourt play area as a part of the East Rancho Verde Village project Declarant shall make the Corninunity Room, tot lot and hardcourt play area located on East Rancho Verde Village available for use to the residents of both East Rancho Verde Village and Rancho Verde Village, subject to the nglit of Declazant or Declarant's successor as the owner of Parcel 2 to adopt reasonable rules and regulations regarding scheduling and use thereof, which might include, but not be limited to, future execution of use agreements with indemnification provisions and the provision of insurance Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P335 (b) In addition to those portions of Parcel 1 subject to the Guest Parking Easement, Declarant shall make certain amemhes located wttlun Rancho Verde Village, nan~ely the swirnmmg pools, a tot lot, the leasing office and the~ogging path, available for use to the residents ofboth East Rancho Verde Village and Rancho Verde Village, subject to the right of Declarant or Declarmit's successor as the owner of Parcel 1 to adopt reasonable rules and regulations regarding scheduling mid use of the guest parking spaces and those other listed amenities, which might include, but not be limited to, future execution of use agreements with indemnification provisions and the provision of insurance (c) If any use authorized by the provtstons hereof of the amenities on East Rancho Verde Vtllage by the restdents of Rancho Verde Vtllage, or the amemhes located on Rancho Verde Village by the restdents of East Rancho Verde Village results m any increase or surcharge in the insurance premiums payable by the owner of Parcel 1 or Pazcel Z, respectively, the amount of such increase or surcharge assessed to one owner shall be payable by the other owner within ten (10) days following presentation of an invoice or statement therefore, accompanied by a copy of the insurer's billing evidencing such increase or surcharge. 3. Insurance Declarant, while it is the owner of both Parcels, and its successor(s) as the owner of each of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, shall obtain and maintain comprehensive public liability insurance insuring the owner of each of the respective Parcels against any liability incident to the use, maintenance or ownership of the Driveway Easement Area and of any shared amemhes and naming the other owner as an additional insured thereon and thereunder 4 Indemnity Notwithstanding the provision of insurance m compliance with paragraph 3 above, the owner of each of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 shall mderrunfy and hold the owner of the other Parcel free and harmless from and against any and alt liabilities, claims, damages, costs, losses, proceedings and causes of action including, but not Invited to, attorneys' fees, arising from any act or omission of the owner of a Parcel and its occupants, tenants and their guests while using that portion of the Driveway Easement Area located on the other Parcel or while using the Community Room and other amemhes described m Section 2 above, providing that such use shall be in accordance with the provisions hereof and reasonable rules and regulations that may be enacted as provided herein 5 Mamtenarice The owner of each Parcel shall maintain, at that owner's cost and expense, that portion of the Driveway Easement Area wlucli is located on such owner's Parcel in good and clean condition and repair The owner of Parcel 1 shall mmntam, at that owner's cost and expense, those portions of Parcel 1 on which guest parking spaces wtuch aze subject to the Guest Parking Easement are located m good and clean condition and repair Maurtenance shall include, without being limited to, maintaining, seating and restnpmg, as necessary, the concrete and/or asphaltic concrete surface thereof m a smooth and evenly covered condition with a type of surfacing material originally installed or with such substitute as shall m all respects be at least equal m quality, use and durability to the original surfacing material The owner of East Rancho Verde Village shall maintain the Community Room, the tot lot and the hardcourt play area Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P336 located within the East Rancho Verde Village property m a good and clean condition and repair, aztd the owner of Rancho Verde Vtllage shall mamtam the swimming pools, tot lot, leasing office and ~ogging path located wrtlun the Rancho Verde Vtllage property m a good and clean condition and repatr Notwithstanding the generality of the maintenance obligations contained herein, If, by reason of a default, an owner of a Pazcel causes the maintenance on the other Parcel to be performed, the owner of the Parcel performing the work shall be entitled to recover maintenance costs incurred in comiechon with maintaining the Driveway or the amenities on the other Parcel, as well as any costs associated with or arising from an act or occurrence m violation of any rules and regulations which has resulted In damage. 6, Failure to Maintmn. Curuie Default Except in the case of an emergency threatening Lfe or property (m which case wntten notice shall not be required for an owner to take action necessary to abate the dangerous condrhon), m the event of any breach or threatened breach of any of the provisions of this Declaration by any owner or an occupant, tenant or guest of either Rancho Verde Village or East Rancho Verde Vtllage, If an owner fails to perfonn that owner's obligations following thirty (30) days written notice specifying the nature of the default from the other Parcel owner, the other owner shall have the nght, but not the obligation, to do or perform such act as may be necessary to cute the breach of the defaulting owner, including, but not lumted to, maintaining the Dnveway Easement Area on the defaulting owner's Parcel The defaulting owner sliall reimburse the perfonning owner for all reasonable costs and expenses mcured by the performing owner m performance of the defaulting owner's maintenance obligations Reimbursement shall be made within thirty (30) days after presentation to the defaulting owner of paid invoices demonstrating the work performed To the extent necessary, a non-defaulting nwner shall have a license to enter upon the defaulting owner's Pazcel to perform any required work. 7 Use Each owner of a Parcel may make any use of that portion of a Dnveway Easement Area located on such owner's Parcel which does not unreasonably Interfere with the use and enlovment of the Dnveway Easement Area by the occupants, tenants, guests and Invitees of the other Parcel Each owner shall be entitled to keep and mamtam signs controlling speeding, directional signs, and other traffic calming devices on such owner's Parce] as may be approved by the Crty or a may be reasonably necessary to enforce reasonable traffic rules and i egulations on each Parcel However, other than traffic signage, control and cahnmg devices, no owner shall construct or mamtam any nnprovement on such owner's Pazcel which prohibits or unreasonably uilubrts the use of the Dnveway Easement Area by the occupants, tenants, guests and invitees of the other Parcel, except that dunng construction of Improvements m East Rancho Verde Village, Declarant may take reasonable precautions to prohibrt the use of the Dnveway Easement Areas located on East Rancho Verde Vtllage until completion of such Improvements to protect members of the public from construction or excavation activities aid to prohibit use of such areas on East Rancho Verde Vtllage whrch would delay, obstruct or make construction of hmprovements thereon more expensive Except as herein provided, no building, fence, wall, hedge, bamcade or obstruction of any kind shall be erected or maintained on or wrthin the Dnveway Easement Area Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Conunon Use P337 8 Esclus:vity. The Easements granted and retained hereunder are non-exclusive and shall be used rn common by the occupants, guests, rnvitees, and pennrttees of the owners of each Parcel and their successors and assrgns 9 Ezempnon from Lrabikty No owner may except rtself from habrltty for rts share of any expenses incurred under this Declaratron which are to be charged to that owner, nor release that owner's Parcel from the lien and charges establrshed in this Declaration, by waiver of the use or enloyinent of the Dnveway Easement Area located on such owner's Parcel or by the abandoiunent of that owner's Parcel 10 Covenants to Run With the Land Each and every one of the provrsions of this Declaratron to be performed on the part of Declarant or Declarant's successors and assigns as the owners of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2, including the benefits and the burdens hereof, shall rvn with title to each of the said Parcels and shall binding upon and inure to the benefit of the hems, assigns, successors and owners of each of the Parcels. Each of the Parcels shall be held, transferred, encumbered, used, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the provisions of this Declaration which shall run with title to each of the Pazcels m perpetuity 1 I Method ofAmer:dmertt The provtsrons of this Declaration may be modrfied or amended, m whole or m part, only by an instrument m venting, executed and acknowledged by the owners of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, which wntrng has been consented to by the City and duly recorded m the Officral Records of San Bemardmo County, Cahfomra Notwrthstandmg the generality of the foregoing, however, the consent of any mortgagee or holder of a secunty interest rn Parcel 1 or Parcel 2 shall be required rn order to cause the rterest of such mortgagee or holder of a secunty interest rn exrstence at the time of such proposed amendment to be subordinate to such amendment It is expressly understood and agreed that no modrficatton or amendment, in whole or iii part, of this Declaration shall require consent or approval on the part of any tenant or occupant of the Parcels 12 No Thud Parh~ Benefic:ary Except for the provisions of this Declaration which are expressly stated to be for the benefit of the City, the provtsrons of this Declaration are for the benefit of the owners, occupants, guests, tenants and mvrtees of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 and not for the benefit of any thud party, nor shall thrs Declaration be deemed to have conferred any nghts, express or rrnplied, upon any thud person or upon the public generally Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to be a gift to the general publrc or the creation upon any portion of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2 or any of the easements created hereunder of any interest for any public purpose whatsoever, rt being the urtent of Declarant that thrs Declaration shall be stnctly lunrted to and for the purposes herein expressed 13 Effect ofForeclosure If any Parcel subject to a hen created by any provisron under this Declaration is subject to the hen of a bonafide mortgage or encumbrance, (r) the foreclosure of any lren created by anything set forth rn this Declaratron shall not operate to affect or tmparr the lien of such mortgage or deed of trust, and (rr) the foreclosure of the Iten of such Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P338 mortgage or deed of trust, the acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure of such mortgage or deed of trust or a sale under the power of sale contained m any such mortgage or deed of trust (these events shall be refened to collectively as "Events of Foreclosure") shall not operate to affect or unpau the hen of this Declaration, except that any person or persons who obtained an interest through any of the Events of Foreclosure and their successors to interest shall take tttle free of the obligation to pay monetary amounts unposed by this Declaration pnor to the time of any of the Events of Foreclosure, but shall be subs ect to the lien of this Declaration for all charges which occur after the Events of Foreclosure 14 No Easement b~Impkcateon • Prevention ofPrescr:phve Rights Neither the execution of this Declaration nor the granting of the easements descnbed herein shall be deemed to grant any other easement or to establish any other easement by implication or prescription, and the parties to tuts Declazation and their successors understand and agree that the only easements and/or licenses made and granted herein and hereby are the easements and/or licenses which are expressly made and granted by the specific terms of this Declaration The Declarant hereby acknowledges that, except as specifically provided by the teens of this Declaration, notlnng contained herein shall be deemed to grant to any person or entity the right to enter generally upon or generally cross over any portion of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2, other than the areas encumbered by the specific easements granted by and descnbed m the teens of this Declazation. 15 Protection ofMorteagees A breach of the restrictions, conditions, covenants and reservations contained m this Declaration shall not defeat or render invalid the hen of any mortgagee or beneficiary under any duly recorded mortgage or deed of trust encumbering all or any interest of any owner in either Parcel 1 or Parcel 2, made in good faith and for value The restrictions, covenants and reservations contained m this Declazation shall be bmdmg upon and effective against any owner or owners of any such Parcel or any portion or portions of such Parcel, whose title was acquired by foreclosure, trustee's sale or otherwise. 16 SeverabekN If any term, provision or condition contaned m this Declaration shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remaznder of this Declazation, or the application of such term, provision or condition to persons or circumstances other than those with respect to which rt is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be effected thereby and each term, provision and condition of this Declaration shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law 17 Buidmg_Effect Tlus Declaration shall, except as otherwise provided hereini, be bmdmg upon and enure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their hens, executors, administrators, successors and assigns 18 Rights of City. This Declazation may not be amended or tennmated without the pnor written consent of the City. The City shall be considered a thud party beneficiary to this Declaration, which interest shall give the City the right, but not the obligation, by action at law or m equity, to enforce all provisions of this Declaration The City shall have a perpetual easement created by the provisions of this Declaration for ingress and egress upon and over any Parcel for Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P339 the purpose of enforcing any maintenance required by the provisions of this Declaration or of City ordinances, for trash collection and to enforce the provisions of City ordinance relating to traffic control Any cost, expense and expert and attorneys' fees incurred by the City relating to the cunng of any default m the observance or enforcement of tlus Declaration, including all costs m maintaining, repainng, replacing or otherwise performing work on or providing matenals to the Parcels, whether the work or materials were furnished by the City or by pnvate contractors designated by the City, shall promptly be reimbursed from the owner of the affected Parcel to the City No failure by the Crty to enforce any default hereunder shall be deemed to be a waiver of the tight or power of the City to enforce that same default, or a different default, at any later time. In the event that the City is the prevailing party m an enforcement action under this Declaration, the Crty shall have the right to collect its reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses associated with any such action or proceeding 19 Attornevs' Fees If any action or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Declaration, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation to connection with any of the provisions of this Declaration or to interpret this Declaration or any of the provisions hereof, the successful or prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attomeys' fees and other costs incurred n that action or proceeding, whether or not said action or proceeding goes to final Judgement, m addition to any other relief to which it or they maybe entitled, which shall include any post-Judgment attomeys' fees, any attomeys' fees incurred by the prevailing part on appeal, by the prevailing party for any post judgment motion proceedings or heanngs, and any and all attomeys' fees incurred m any and all efforts by the prevailing party to collect its Judgment. 20 Authors Execution of this Declaration shall be presumed to be made by an mdrndual authonzed by kus or her respective corporation by resolution of its board of directors and such execution shall constitute a waiver by that party of any lack of such a resolution 21 Govermna Law Tlus Declaration shall be construed and governed m accordance with the laws of the State of Cahfonua 22 Mucellarteous When used herein, the masculine aitd neuter genders, the singulaz number and the present tense shall be deemed to include the fenumne gender, the plural number and past and future tenses, respectively, where the context so requires. IN WITNESS WI-IEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Declaration as of the day aitd year first above wntten. "DECLARANT" The Southern Cahfonua Housing Development Corporation, a Cahfomia nonprofit public benefit corporation By Richard J. Wluttingham, CFO Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P340 Exhibit "A" [Legal Description of Rancho Verde Village] Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P341 RANCHO VERDE VII.,LAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 OF TRACT MAP NO. 12091, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNL4, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 177 AT PAGES 175 THROUGH 178 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY P342 Exhibit "B" [Legal Descrtption of East Rancho Verdc Village] Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P343 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1 8819 Srerra Madre Avenue That portion of Lot 29 in Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Mandian, according to Map of Cucamonga Lends, as per Map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, m the Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows Beginning 895 96 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Lot, thence South 474.09 feet to the North line at and Santa Fe Railroad right of way; thence Easterly along said right of way to the East I~ne of Lot 29, thence North to the Northeast corner, thence Wast to the point of beginning Excepting tnerefrom that portion lying West of the Southerly extension of the West I~ne of Sierra Madre Avenue and excepting the North 97.01 feet and excepting the South 240 feet thereof. A-1 P344 Parcel 2 8639 Sterna Madre Avenue PARCEL 1: The South 240 feet df that portion of Lot 29, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardmo Meridian, according to the Mep of Cucamonga Lands, m the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, tying Easterly of the Southerly prolongation of the Westerly line of Sierra Madre Avenue, as said Avenue is shown on the Maps of Eureka Gardens, Tract No. 1629, as par Plat recorded in Book 28, Page 20, of Maps, Records of said County PARCEL 2: Anon-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and across that portion of Lot 29, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San 9ernardino Meridian, lying within the Southerly extension of Sierra Madre Avenue, as said Avenue is shown on the Map of the Eureka Gardens Tract No 1829, as per Plet recorded in Book 28, Paga 20 of Maps, Records of said County Excepting therefrom the South 240 feet A-2 P345 Exhibit "C" [Common Driveway/Ingress and Egress) Declaration of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Conmmon Use MASTER SITE PLAN Rancho Verde Village & East Rancho Verde Village EXEIIBIT C n_ w A P347 Exhibit "D" [Commm~ity Room] Declarahon of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P348 &' S' ~ 9g d ~; psi ~ g~~ ~ a ~ P ~~ u8 i~ ~~~ ~~I~ lf~ ~~f3 , ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ tla ~ O ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ii ~1 ~§ ~ ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~g ': '? ~e gib 9iF ~t~ a ~ 11 1$1 tl ~ij = } I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ sj11~~ ~QS~i si f\~B (~ a Ce J ro yJ Nb O O y N Q ~ ~ o ~ o 0 ~a ~ '~ O .w ~ o ~,,, o y ~n cE C W U Z V Y q~ ~ tl 61 ~'i 1 ~~ d ~V1^1 ,~'1y`N V ^~ '~W i `~ ro c 0 s~ V ro no ~ E V ~~ ~u VI s T' V C z B~ d~ p~pe~ Y`! H a P349 w Z w N a r P350 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Cahfomia County of San Bernardino On , 200 ,before roe, Date personally appeared ss Name ¢nd Title of Ofacer (e g , "Jane Dee, Noary Pubbe'") N¢me(s) of Signer(s) Place Notary sc¢i Ahnve ^ personally known to me ^ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evrdence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscnbed to the within instrument and acknowledged to methat he/she/they executed the same mhis/her/then authonzed capacity(res), and that by hrs/her/their srgnature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of whrch the person(s) acted, executed the instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature otNomry Public OPTIONAL Though the urformm~on below is not r equued by lnrr, a may prove vnlunb/e to persons r elymg an the document nrtd could pr event fi nudulenu emovnl and r enttachment of flits form to nnother donunent Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document Declaration of Recrorocal Easements for Ineress & Eeress and Common Use Document Dated , 200 Number of Pages 8 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name. ^ Indrvrdual ^ Corporate Officer -Title(s) _ ^ Partner - ^ Limited ^ General ^ Attorney in Fact ^ Trustees ^ Guardian or Conservator Other Signer is Representing Right Tltmnbpnnt of Signer Declaratton of Reciprocal Easements for Ingress and Egress and Common Use P351 EXHIBIT "D" [Schedule of Completion and Occupancy of East Rancho Verde Village] Housing Incentive Agreement P352 EXHIBIT "D" EAST RANCHO VERDE VILLAGE EXPANSION AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE Item Key Components Approx Date Acau~sition Phase 1 Hard Deposit Release to Fidelity of $10,000 -SFH (8819 Sierra Madre) 2!3/2005 2 Hard Deposit Release to Fidelity of $10,OOD -Vacant Lot (8839 Sierra Madre) 2/3/2D02 3 Open Escrow -SFH (8619 Sierra Madre) 2/4/2D05 4 Open Escrow- Vacant Lot (8839 Sierra Madre) 2/11/2005 5 Hard Deposit Release to Fidelity of $40,OOD to EMend Escrow -SFH (8819 Sierra Madre) 6/3/2D05 6 Owner closes Escrow - $450,000 Vacant Lot (8639 Sierra Madre) 6/27/2005 7 Owner closes Escrow - $405,000 SFH (8819 Sierra Madre) 7/1/2D05 Flnancina Phase 8 Agency makes Financial Commitment 7!6/2005 9 Agency & Owner execute Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) 7/13/20D5 10 Agency reimburses Owner of 8819 and 8839 acgwsitions 7!28/2005 11 Agency reimburses and releases funds for predevelopment expenses 8/12/2005 12 Owner files San Bernardino County (SBC) HOME Application 9/1/2005 13 SBC & Owner execute HOME Loan Agreement 10/14/2005 14 SBC releases funds for construction 5/15!2007 15 Owner releases funds for construction 5/15/2007 16 Bank executes construction loan & makes funds available for construction 5/15/20D7 Pre-Construction Phase 17 Owner, architect and civil engineer meet to coordinate design review process 7/24/2005 23 Owner submits schematics to City for Design Review 12/6/2005 24 City completes Design Review -Planning Commission Approval 12/13/2006 25 Owner submits Housing Incentve Agreement to City 10/16/2006 26 City Council approves Housing Incentive Agreement 11/1/20D6 27 Owner submits construction documents ("final drawings") to Agency 11/15/2006 28 Agency approves construction documents 11/3D/2006 29 Owner submits construction documents to City for Plan Check 12/14/2006 30 Owner submits rewsed proposed Pro/ect Budget to Agency 1/15/2007 31 Agency rewews and approves Final Pro/ect Budget 1/30/2007 32 City completes Plan Check -Building & Engineering Department Approvals 5!112007 Construction Phase 33 Owner pulls grading permit & begins grading 5/15/2007 34 Owner completes grading & pulls bldg permits 6!1/2007 35 Owner starts construction 6/1/2007 36 Owner completes construction 6!1/2008 Lease-Uo Phase 37 Owner/Manager starts lease-up 6/1/2008 38 Owner/Manager completes lease-up, property 100% occupied 9/1/2008 P353 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Callfornla ) ss County of San Bernardino ) On .2006, before me, Date Name and Title of OKcer (e g ,'Jane Doe, Notary Public") personally appeared Name(s) of Signer(s) ^ personally known to me ^ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below rs not required bylaw, rt may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document Housing Incentive Agreement Document Dated Number of Pages Signer(s) Other Than Named Above Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name. ^ Individual ^ Corporate Officer -Title(s) ^ Partner - ^ Limited ^ General ^ Attorney in Fact ^ Trustees ^ Guardian or Conservator Other Signer is Representing Right Thumbpnnt of Signer Housing Incentive Agreement P354 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Protect Fde No.• Development Review DRC2005-01060 and Housing Incentive Agreement D RC2006-00916 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in-place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Protect Flle No.: DRC2005-01060 and DRC2006-00916 Applicant: Rancho Southern Callfornla Housing Development Corp. Initial Study Prepared by: Michael Diaz Date: November 29. 2006 .. - -, - -. .. - Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform tc any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Revew of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering 1 of 8 w .. - -. - .: All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efhaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residental and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping CultulalResources~ ~Ip .~~~.,49 _~Vr~~lji ` ~r ~ rrzf~.i+i~f~kfl~ b~,"~ti'H~ tl~l~~r ~~~kr.'~ct/e-bYS~ ~.- ~ ~ 7r~.~z`~'#Si:`.:L ~ ~. ~it~• f ~{ i7~~. ~ ~/ ~1 _k ao e"„',] . u~ ~ ' *3~.. vg ~u:Sv _ h~ Y~-Ab,,, 'x ~` '~ ]4.~~ r `14 . i . cr Ii any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualdied archaeologist to monitor construc4on activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga wdl Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sties from demolition or siynrtican[ modrfication without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 mcorporaUon of archaeological sties within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on signilicant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdehnes Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 3 of 8 w cn rn .. - . - .: Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule esiablished by the City to reduce PM,o constructon emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the sde during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inaciroe construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions •~ -„. .~-- - ~. y:.. .*. fy'•a 'r. ,~•Y - WaterQua~ity-~ '-~,. ''~ "' and Hydro~ogy ~ ~_,4 ti ~ zr" ,~i~~ ;? `_~, ax gdl*•a-~s`:~c` ~._ _ ~ 4+$.- - _ -w: ,~'.~=;4-~ ;~;'- ~ ,ini,.Ez$, *;~ ; ,. t•t4~.~,'+ta ~.s.i~i ~ .~ -:zw~~, ~. y~~>_ ~s.{i _ .... -.,,t ~~~, r~: ~•~~~;~,;z~~. ~ . ~ , ~ , - - ~ ~ ~ Prior to issuance of yrading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-sde to reduce pollutants during construction actiwhes entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion Irom the time of ground disturbing achvdies are irntiated throuyh completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specdy the Uming of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced m southern Caldorma, and b) An mspecUon and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur edher on-site or off-sde as a result of this protect wdl be corrected throuyh a remediation or restoration program within a specified lime frame 5 of 8 w cn V .. ... -. -. - .: Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identdicahon Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit 1s .ia, ,r--. 6it,o~L;1 i ,1t;'% t-"~n~.~ ..;tx zrt ;-f^ ,.`1 ^m1~ ~'i? '~~~a. ~'~n, :St`s ~~;;~. Noise` €3'; :~~_, ",,,_,.y,t.~r,, r~~ y~, ` - 4 s~.ntk~:",lw ~ „ry,-any' 's q.`-.%J:'"' PkT,r'-Nv'~5 :~.~,x,~Y,-,~y,~rr``S) _.a3-ES!~. -..^. wat~'."3 y'S_ .t~,'ii'~d ~t ,.u^:~' s 't. ~r,ti -s,~E,~~s t&: i w ri~~~i ~"~~~-~. is`x'~5~1W1 )+za.' '.~~,~c°~-~`4 '~'- e%.'.. 3u~x5'd.<~`~'Cy'G~^•w~Vr t -.V.°" K/ ~"dimyr7"~W'„ :s ~~1, ~,,~,arf'r~ a:+«: ~if~t1_:'_.{S.nx"~1c ,w}aye ~°.a ~ e".= ~h~~~ ,v~:z~+ :,~ iIDf At'i~l :!_~`.1 ,t ,~r~~ i. "s °d! Tt,,;,~~.,~r,.~•,,~` permits, the applicant shall Pnor to issuance of bwlding PD/BO B Plan Check and C 3/4 submit to the Planning Director and Building Official for during review and approval, building plans that demonstrate construction compliance with the noise attenuation recommendations of the acoustical engineer as contained in the Acoustical Analysis prepared by Davy & Associates, Inc (April 2006), and on file with the Planning Department Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified m Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Mondonng at other times may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official wdhm 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m iniensdy to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 7of8 w r~ P359 R A N C t1 O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE February 21, 2007 TO Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM James R Troyer, Planning Director BY Jennifer Nakamura, Assistant Planner SUBJECT DISCUSSION OF POLITICAL SIGN ORDINANCES RECOMMENDATION That the City Council review the information provided in the staff report and attachments and provide direction to staff as needed BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per City Council Request, staff is providing a comparison of political sign ordinances from surrounding cities for a comparison to Rancho Cucamonga's political sign ordinance Staff reviewed the political sign ordinances of ten neighboring cities (Corona, Fontana, Pomona, Ontario, Moreno Valley, San Bernardino, Montclair, Upland, Colton and San Dimas) and found some distinctions between our ordinance and those of neighboring cities 1 Size Requirements Several cities had maximum size requirements based on the type of land use Residential properties were limited to a maximum size of 16 square feet, with commeraal and industrial properties limited to a maximum size of 32 square feet 2 Visibility Three of the cities do not allow signs to be lighted, either directly or indirectly Placement While all aties state that signs cannot be on public property or public right- of-way, most ordinances made clear that signs cannot be affixed to a tree, shrub, fence, post, utility pole, etc Signs that violate this section were subject to immediate removal without written or verbal notification 4 Quantity of signs Three aties require a maximum of one sign per parcel A closer look at our border aties (Upland, Ontario and Fontana) shows that their ordinances are very similar to ours They prohibit placement in the public right-of-way, they regwre all signs to be removed within 10 days after the election, and they reserve the right to remove violating signs There are two key differences between our political sign ordinance and our border aties, timing of posting and the size of the signs Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana's political sign P360 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT POLITICAL SIGN ORDINANCE February 21, 2007 Page 2 ordinances allow political signs to be posted no earlier than 30 days before the election Ontario allows signs to be posted 45 days before the election and Upland does not have a restriction on how early the signs can be posted Rancho Cucamonga allows signs to up to 32 square feet in size Ontario allows signs up to 16 square feet Upland allows signs up to 6 square feet in residential zones, and up to 16 square feet in commercial and industrial zones Fontana has no restrictions on the size of its political signs Regarding enforcement of political signs, six of the ten neighboring aties responded (San Dimas, Ontario, Corona, Rialto, Colton and Fontana) and indicated that they do enforce their ordinance, particularly if the signs are in the public right-of-way Responding cities indicated that aty personnel will remove signs posted in the right-of-way Most cities only respond to signs on private property in response to complaints San Dimas focuses their enforcement efforts on removing the signs after elections While there are a few differences between the City's political sign ordinance and those of neighboring cities, enforcement is similarly focused on signs in the public right of way and prompt removal after elections have been held Respectfully submitted~/,~~~j~`'~{~~"~,~~ L ~' C~ I Jam R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT Is POLITICA L SIGNS ORDINANCES -ma trix , , s , Permdted in any zoning distract sublect No > than 32 sq to provisions Edher public or private, Crty planner or Posted no earlier than 30 days prior to ft total area for Will not obstruct will not cause public safety or health designee have right Rancho election one side Height view from hazards Cannot be placed or fxed on a to remove any signs Cucamonga Removed no later than 10 days after no > than 8 ft Pedestrians & tree, fence, utility pole Cannot be contrary to election from grade vehicle traffic osted on an P y public property or m provisions of this public nghtof-way w/o encroachment section eo rmit by city engineer Posted N/A Removed within 10 days after date of election Any that remains after 10 days shall be deemed Shall not be posted Cost of removal pursuant abandoned Planning Director may in the corner cut-off Shall not be posted on any public Violating signs are by actual responsible party remove abandoned signs & any signs area defined in property or in the public right-of-way sublect by City or candidate's designated Corona ~+'hich constitute immediate peril to 17 70 050, except in City forces sublect to immediate forces to immediate agent Shall be actual cost persons or property w/o further nonce accordance w/ removal w/o prior written or verbal removal w/o pnor or standard cost pursuant to Removal is sublect to cost recovery as requirements of 17 7 M l notificeUOn wntten or verbal fi an amount set by Gty provided Confisceted signs will be 0 040 ( uniupa noti cation Council stored for 10 days from notification Code) letter Signs will be discarded d there is failure to claim Posted No earlier than 30 days before election Removed 10 days after election or will be deemed a nwsance and may be removed by City after Shall not be posted on any public wrdten notification City may remove property or m the public nght-of-way or Violating signs shall be deemed a public nwsance violating signs that are on priv property upon public property Shall not be and must be removed by owner of property, w/wrdten notficetion to responsible Will not obstruct the attached to any utility pole, public fence, candidate, candidate's committee, or ballot party to remove such signs (see view or conflict with tree, or any other post or object located measure committee City hall also has right to wording C) Signs far successful any traffic sign, in public nght-of-way Violating signs on remove said sign in accordance w/ this section candidates of other elections shall not signal, or device public property may be removed Removed signs are stored at the carp yard and Fontana remain posted for other purposes Will not obstruct summarily by the city at any time Will may be destroyed after 15 days of written However, it may remain if subsequent view from need permission from owner, owner notfcelion (lists details of dating, see E) The general or other election will be held Pedestrians & representative, lessee or tenant of resposible party shall be billed far actual costs of within 100 days of pnor election Signs vehicle traffic (See property rf erecting signs on another the removal Claimed signs may be released upon on vacant parcels remaining for> than warding A) property City may remove violating payment of fees incurred Any person aggneved 10 days wdl be removed Removed signs that are on pnv property w/ by actions of Crty may follow fhe Appeal signs are taken to the Gty corporation written notification to responsible party procedures (See FJ yard (or temporary storage City will (see wording B) keep account of costs incurred including incidental expenses (fists examples, see D) May be erected from the date of the On private property Signs shall be Signs not removed within 7 days of deadline will Pomona close of nomination of candidates or removed by the following Monday be removed by City by expense of political qualification for ballot measures until following election candidate or responsible political organization election W d) J ntario osted No sooner than 45 days Preceding the election Removed within 10 days after the date of election Shall not exceed 16 sq ft total area, double- faced signs permitted Shall not exceed 8 ft in height, except within an enclosed bldg ar structure annot be lighted directly or indirectly Shall not be on private property vacant or w/o permission from owner Cannot be placed or affixed to a tree, fence, post, utility pole, nor any structure, by glue, nails, screws Shall not be on public property or pubkc ROW The Bldg Offiaal has the right to remove all signs placed contrary to any provisions of this section Not more than 1 sign per parcel for each candidate or proponent Shall not be posted in violation of any other provisions of this code Violating signs will be removed by City 5 Shall not exceed Cannot be artdiaally days after notice of 32 sq ft Shall lighted Cannot Shall not be erected, placed or violation given to Posted Not more than 90 days prior to not exceed 6 ft in °bscure view of any f ff maintained on private property w/o responsible party Cannot do following mars, election height No lot ire hydrant, tra ic owner consent, lessee, or person in Any signs on public defaces, disfigures or Removed A sign erected for candidate shall contain sign, traffic signal, lawful possession of property Also prop In violation of damages any public bldg, Moreno Valley who prevails in a primary election may political signs street sign or public cannot be on publicly owned bldgs, subsections (see A) structure, or other property be maintained until 10 days after final with aggregate informational sign structure, tree or shrub, or upon any or endangers to Endangers safety of election All others removed whn 10 surface area in Cannot block lines o portion of a public street or highway safety will be Persons or property days excess of 60 sq sight to areas of right-of-way which is used for traffic or removed w/o notice ff vehicular & ped padang City may bill traffic reasonable sign removal costs to responsible party Violating signs on Permit reowred from Needs owner, agent, lessee, or tenant public property may Director of Dev Services consent if erected on prrv property May be summarily Permit shall state name of Sign shall not be only place signs on noted list of removed by Dir Of owner of the sign(s) and near curb of any locations submitted to Director of Dev Dev Services that applicant is authorized street intersection Services (see "Other") Shall not be Violating signs on agent of the owner The when it obstructs stapled or affixed to any utility pole, nor pnvate property will applicant w/ the permit shall Max area of sign view of motonsts & be in public ROW, parkway, or publicy give the sign owner submit to Director of Dev Posted N/A is 16 sq ft in cross traffic or owned or maintained land or property a written notice that Services a list of locations San Removed Shall be removed and residential creates traffic provided that signs may be located in it'll be removed if where signs will be posted Bernardino disposed of not more than 30 days after districts & 32 sq hazard or at any public parks for not more than 12 firs in violation is not and certify the censent from the election or voting date ft in all other location where it con/unction w/ a poldicel rally Adhesive corrected (See A for property owner, and only districts obstructs the view backing cannot be used to affix on any speafic details) If erect signs at those of, or can be bldg or structure Must be first affixed to violation is not locations Signature of confused with any a temporary backing of wood, paper, corrected, sign may applicant is required traffic sign or cardboard, plastic, etc so that it can be removed Provisions of this Chapter marking easily be removed from its posted Violaters of this not applicable of signs on location Chapter are gwlty of occupied residential infraction premises erected by propery owner W N 1 I I ~ I Permd required from Permit required from Comm Dev Dept Cannot Comm Dev Dept have more than 1 sign per and shall agree in Parcel for each candidate writing, to the Property owner permission Cannot exceed 8 voluntary removal of required for private sq ft in total area, signs within 10 days Properties For vacant double-faced Cannot be affixed to a tree, fence, post, after election 8 shall Property candidate for Posted no sooner than 60 days permitted utility pole, egwpment, nor any reimburse City for all public office, proponent or preceding electron for which permit has Cannot exceed structure Cannot be on any public vests related with the opponent of ballot issues, Montclav been issued overall height of 4 property or in public ROW All signs removal, storage, and or cemmdtees Removed Within 10 days after the g except rf d is must be maintained and kept m good and/or destruction of associated wRh shall affix to date of the election within an repay at all times signs The City the rear of the sign a copy enclosed bldg or Manager has the of a declarartion of having ' structure right to remove all the owner s permission, signs placed including name 8 address contrary to the of owner These provisions of this declarations provided by section City and shall be signed by candidate far office or assocated representatives Not > than 6 sq ft total area in res No more than 1 sign per site per Requires permit by City Posted N/A zones, no > than 16 sq ft in wmm 8 candidate Cannot be attached to any Manager Statement Upland Removed Within 10 days after industnal zones Height = no > than 4 ft tree, fence post, utility pole, nor affixed includes agreement of election in res zones 8 no > than 6 ft in comm in any permanent manner to any understanding wRh 8 industnal Cannot be lighted directly structure Cannot be posted m public or indirectly ROW signature Posted No sooner than 100 days Shall not obstruct before election Signs originally placed visibility of No political sign shall be placed or hxed for a pnmary election may remain d Shall not exceed Pedestnan or to any publicly owned tree, fence or such signs also relate to the next 32 sq ff in total vehicular traffic or uUtity pole wdhin the public right-of-way general election area Not to Pose a public safety or otherwise posted on any public Colton Removed No later than 10 days exceed an overall °r health hazard, property Placement of such political following election Signs existing on height of 12 feet such signs are signs shall be deemed a public property longer than 10 days following from the finished deemed to be public nwsance pursuant to California the election shall be deemed grade nuisances and shall Government Code, Section 38773 5 abandoned and a nuisance and shall be be removed in and shall be subject to summary abated pursuant to Title 8 of this code accordance with abatement Title 8 of this rode Shall not exceed Yolating signs that are constituted a public nwsance 8 be deemed abandoned by its owner 9 sq ft in size nor will be removed by the city w/o notice Correctable violating signs may be removed by the Posted N/A 3 ff m any city d, after providing 5 days wntten notice requesting correction of violation by the owner of San Dimas Removed 10 days after the dale of direction for res sign 8 property owner the signs have been posted These shall be removed, relocated or election Zones For all altered as required by this section The notice regwrements herein shall be satisfied upon a other zones, reasonable and diligent effort by the qty to locate the owner of the sign, property owner signs shall not and/or tenant exceed 32 s ft W m W 01/23/2007 11:06 9094666854 PAGE 02 Political Signs Pvlicy City of Rancho Cucamonga to view of the problems involving enforceabihfy of the current sign ordinance regulating political signs, I suggest the following. 1 • Repeal th@ existing ordinance because it rs unconstrtutrona-, Enforcement would subfect the City to Iiabi-ity and potentially expensive titigatron 2 Create a written policy that would involve a written plaage algneq by alt candidates at the time of Bling that would regulate po4Ucal srgns Candidates could choose to not sign the pledge and that fact would ba publicized so that the voters would know who has signed the pledge and who has not. 3. The pledge would essential cover the sa including but not limited to time before anq after an~slection number of days before and after an electron should be decided and stated in the policy), size of signs and placement, and, it Could also include other reasonable restrictions. 4. The existing ordinance should be replaced by 2n ordinance that covers only be prohibit ons o political signs that b odc sapfety oriented signs tike stole ospeed srgns 5. The City Attorney should be directed to draft the language of the policy and new or ~rnance. 6 Su ice the aty cannot regulate the content of bdl board signs, the new policy and ~ ordinance should specifically state that they era not attempting to regulate that ype of content. Draft respectfully subm(tted for Council oonsrderation, November 27, 2006 P364 Sar, ; ,,agnolo, Cfty Council Member STAFF REPORT BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT Date: February 12, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Trang Huynh, Bwlding & Safety Official James Troyer, Planning Director By: Kurt J Keating, Code Enforcement Supervisor ~~~~ Subject: YARD SALES RANCHO cUCAMONGA BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: During the February 7, 2007 City Council Meeting, a citizen requested that the City Council consider adopting an ordinance regulating yard sales within the City The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not currently have an ordinance in place that regulates yard sales, garage sales, or other similar activities Because the City does not have an ordinance regulating yard sales, it can sometimes be a difficult task for staff to effectroely respond to calls for service for these types of events Staff has outlined a few options below for the City Council to consider during their discussion of this topic Any of these suggestions can be modified or enhanced based on Council's direction One option for consideration would be for staff to work with the City Attorney's Office to develop an ordinance which regulates this type of actrnty Generally, muncipalities also incorporate sign regulations into the ordinance which specifically deal with these types of events Code Enforcement Staff would be responsible for monitonng locations within the City that exceed a set number of sales within a specified time period as well as handling the enforcement of improperly displayed signs Generally, sales are limited to no more than two or three sales during a calendar year In conjunction with the aforementioned suggestion, staff could also develop a permit/licensing component to the proposed ordinance which would require a citizen to obtain apermit/license for the activity from the City prior to the event Many municipalities charge a small license fee, ranging from $3 to $25, for these permits which are generally issued through the Business License Division This component would increase staff involvement in the processing of the permit and the tracking of how many sales are conducted at a location during a specified time period Code Enforcement staff would continue to handle the follow-up inspections on the weekends as required to ensure compliance with the adopted ordinance P365 P366 YARD SALES PAGE2 FESRUARY12,2007 Lastly, should the City Council opt not to regulate yard sales, Code Enforcement may still be able to deal with locations that have yard sales on a weekly or very routine basis If staff can determine that the occupant of a location is conducting a business from their location, based on the frequency of the sales and the type(s) of items being sold from the property, staff may be able to handle the violation under existing provisions of the municipal code which regulate business activity in residential neighborhoods As you are aware, Code Enforcement staff has recently expanded services to include coverage seven days per week. Dunng the next several weeks, staff wdl monitor the yard sale situation throughout the City, and if it is determined that sales are only occurring at a limited number of locations on a routine basis staff could proceed with enforcement using existing code provisions as mentioned above Respectfully Su matted, Trang Huyn James Troyer Building & Safety Official Planning Director ~~ w .~ i .~ ~i ,. O ~~ ~~I n r •~ ~~ N N w 0 N .,.~ 4~ .~ ,~ a w 0 .~ L .~ N N .~ d L a a~ 0 a~ .~ LL Y i O N O L L 0 f+ .~ C •~ •~ a H w ~~ O N .,.., G~ y N H •E C1 .~.. ;. O lL ~ Q~ ~ ~"> O O O ~ ~ V ~ ~U y ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~, O c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U 4~ 4~ r--~ •~ ~ ~ v~ O ~ .~ Q ,~ `~' ~ . • • . • ~ .;,e ,- ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~O O • .~ CCU ~~ .~ 0 G~ V r..- .,~ u d FI H H a a~ w 0 ;~ ~i .s ~ 3~ U 3 .-. C a 0 a~ as 0 H J I ~~ O a N N w N H E a m 0 N H C ._ L Q .~ L V d O C .~ '~ 0 = ~ .D ~ ,~ 0 ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~d c r"j_>o N N• a N N w w~ OI xi .y 4 m 0 L~ ;`7 .,..i ~••~ •~ 0 A ~I a~ .~ a C!~ a A ~ .~ '"O o c ~ M C/S ~ .~ Q ~ G~ O a~ V ~L U .~ N ~r M ~ .~ M w ~ ~, O 3 a~ c rn c ~ _ X A td L O ~ • ~ o 0 a N N w ~E a a~ r w 0 as ii O c~ a N O C 0 .~ c cd L .~ O +~ +'' L U o !~ '~ a~ N c~ N +~ C _O '~ a~ c c -o a~ Q. L ~~ ~Q .~ a a~ 0 .. L .$ .~ N 4 w O i C ~ ~ 0 .~ V ~. O U a 0 .~ a m 0 .~ i~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 0 V a O .y w L ~_ 1 ~~~~~ i .ate.. .f _ i," ,~<~.. -+fi;~ 0 •~y `~ V '~ ~/1 0 -:~ y y . ~ N Q 01 w O r .S O ~~ V ~ ~~ OI U a O y .~ a a~ 0 :a 1 O ~_ i yy N .` 4 0 w .~ :, t f~i. rx.~ ~ ~ F. - ; i ~ ', s. w~ ~' i ~?. ~'! i ~ ~` j ,1$!R ~ ~. ~,, ~ .~ ~~.. ~.- f= 0 • ~y ~~ V a 0 ._ a a~ r 0 .~ ii GPI O .., u ~~ U a 0 .~ 4 t ... i ~i ~,~ • ~y ~~ `~ 0 n~, I W •~^^~I ~ ^`` 1. ww`` /~ W 1 '~ O r~ 0 • ~^^I `~ V U a 0 yh h .~ a a~ w 0 a ^ 1 .~ O .~, r..- u 0 U a 0 y E m a m 0 `` -~r1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ y. ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ a ~ ~ ;''~ ~.+ ~ ~ V ` ~ o ~ ~ ~L L ~ O .,~ r..~ V L r..- O a 0 . ~ ~. 0 .. 1 .`~~ '4 ;+ ~ii 11 ~ ~ - .. ry ., ~ ~ i ~.= i~._ ..._._~s; y ^ .~ ~ r j. `:" ~ ~'~ - /^ ~: ~. :. . ri: ~~ r" .. a.~ 1 r ^ ^ ^ L ^~ L W O Z •,~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ '- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ m v~ C~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ Z .~ Z ~ a L ~ o y .~ ~1 w O i r..~ ~~ O d U °~ ~E m a m w 0 V .~ .~ ~ V N ~- ~ O ~ ~ t 4~ ~ .~ ~ ~ y.. L .~ .~ L .~ 0 L o a .~ O .~ m V ~V i ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ t ~ v O ~ ~ N V ~ o ° ~ L O O _~ ~ O ~ .~ w a • ~ e MEMORANDUM CITl CLERIC'S OFFICE Date: February 21, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From. Debra J Adams, CMC, City Clerk Subject: DISCUSSION OF FREEDOM'S FL ME PLAZA P367 ~'` - ~. RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Attached for your information are staff reports and minutes from prior discussions regarding Freedom's Flame Plaza P368 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 6, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 10 RANCHO CUCAMON HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following Items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input ' 1 REPORT ON THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) OPENING, JUNE 1, 2005 (Oral) 2 PRESENTATION ON NEIGHBORHOOD CLEAN-UP DAY (Oral) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion They are not public hearing Items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input 1 COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Counclimember ) 2 CONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPOINT NEW MEMBERS TO THE 254 LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 3. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO INSTALL A SIGN AT 256 CENTRAL "PARK REGARDING THE i ®a i~^) 'FLAME SCULPTURE J. ADJOURNMENT 1, Debra J Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 30, 2005, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, P369 ~t v'\'' _ R ~ L'4 -a. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A 'J p COMMUNITY SERVICE S Staff Report DATE: June 29, 2005 TO• Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Clty Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO INSTALL SIGN AT CENTRAL PARK REGARDING THE FREEDOM'S FLAME SCULPTURE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Clty Council consider the request by Kevin Hoyt at the June 15, 2005, Councl meeting to place a sign at Central Park regarding the Freedor~i's Flame sculpture BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting on June 15, 2005, Mr Kevin Hoyt addressed the Council dunng public comments and requested authonzation for the Freedom's Flame Committee to install a sign at Central Park, identifying the park as the future site of the Freedom"s Flame sculpture The Freedom's Flame sculpture will be a memonal to commemorate the World Trade Center crisis which occurred on September 11, 2001 Currently, anon-profit Foundation is working to raise funds for construction of the sculpture Back on August 7, 2002, the Clty Council considered a request from the Freedom's Flame Organizing Committee for the Clty to host the future sculpture, once it was created As a result of this request, the City Councll serving at that time approved Resolution Number 02-229 titled as follows• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING THE FREEDOM FLAME PROJECT AND THE CITY'S OFFER TO BE CONSIDERED AS THE HOST CITY FOR THE WEST COAST MEMORIAL A copy of the approved Resolution is attached Specifically, the Resolution endorses the protect, offers to be the host City for the memorial and offers to consider sites such as Centra! Park The former action by the previous City Council did not approve a specific site for the Freedom's Flame sculpture. P370 REQUEST TO INSTALL FREEDOM'S FLAME SIGNAGE AT CENTRAL PARK July 6, 2005 Page 2 Staff recommends that the City Council discuss the request to allow installation of the proposed Central Park sign and provide policy direction to staff P371 Gty Council Minutes July 6, 2005 Page 10 13 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO INSTALL A SIGN AT CENTRAL PARK REGARDING THE FREEDOM'S FLAME SCULPTURE A staff report was presented by Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment Addressing the City Council were Dennis Stout stated this protect has been worked on for over four years He stated the Resolution first approved by the City Councl does not indicate where the Freedom's Flame should be placed He stated they are requesting that Central Park be the place for the Freedom's Flame He stated In order to avoid sales tax issues with this monument, it should belong to the City of Rancho Cucamonga He stated he would like to get this process started to find a location within Central Park for this He stated they are currently raising money for this protect, but that a lot of the donors are asking where it will be placed He stated they have raised hundreds of thousands of dollars, but that this will cast millions Councilmember Spagnolo felt the City should make the commitment to the land at Central Park for this monument, and to approve the sign to go up to show support for this He did not feel the City should turn its back on this type of protect because of the impact 911 has had on this Country He stated the items we have from this tragic event are very important and that the City should make a commitment to use a piece of land at Central Park and also allow the sign to go up with information about this protect Mayor Alexander commented when the fire truck that was brought up to Chaffey College from the 911 disaster Kevin ~~~ (did not give last name) stated he had the pnwlege of bringing the fire truck back to Rancho Cucamonga He stated this is America's memorial He stated he was given photos from the Pentagon that no one else has and how important this is He staled this is his passion to see this memorial built MOTION Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo to commtl to designating this to Central Park and place the appropriate signage Councilmember Williams stated she is concerned because she feels this is putting the cart before the horse She stated when the decisions are made for phase II of Central Park then consideration can be grven to putting the sign up She felt there should be more discussion as to what phase II of Central Park would include She stated she is concerned about making a decision tonight Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is for the protect He felt this was too premature at this time He felt tike he was being put on the spot to gauge his loyalty or patriotism He stated he lust has concerns Councilmember Michael felt they should first work with staff to find the best place for this and then come back to the City Council with their conceptual plan Dennis Stout felt Counalmember Michael's comments were very good He stated he would be more than willing io work with staff to come up with a conceptual presentation to come back io the City Council He felt it might not hurt to have conversations with the Water District as well Mayor Alexander stated he would like to change the wording to "conceptually commit to", as opposed fo "commd to " He stated he would like to leave the motion as is with this change in wording He repeated the motion as "to conceptually commd to designa4ng the area for Freedom's Flame art feature and placing appropriate signage at Central Park " Motion Fatl 2-3 (Gutierrez, Michael and Wtlhams voted no) P372 Ctty Councl Minutes July 6, 2005 Page 11 MOTION Moved by Michael, seconded by Wdhams to direct the FPeedom's Flame Foundation to work with Community Services Staff, or any other staff designated by the City Manager, to develop some conceptual plans of site location at Central Park and the feasibility of locating that conceptually, and to be brought back to the Council in the form of a Resolution committing this Motion carried unanimously 5-0 J. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to adjourn Motion carriec unanimously 5.0 The meeting adjourned at 8 42 p m Respectfully submitted, Debra J Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved " P373 City Council Agenda ~- August 7, 2002 4 RESOLUTION NO 02-228 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15529 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 17 Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15970, 96 located on the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Pepperidge Lane, submdted by Remy Schneider 16 Approval of a Resolution endorsing the ~ Flame protect and the C(ty's offer to be considered as the host city for the West Coast Memorial ,r ~(', "ST'A'B ~~~ RESOLUTION NO 02-229 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING THE FREEDOM Fi-AME PROJECT AND THE CITY'S OFFER TO BE CONSIDERED AS THE HOST CITY FOR THE WEST COAST MEMORIAL E CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion The City Clerk will read the title Any item can be removed for discussion No Items Submitted F ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised andlor posted as public hearings as required by law The Chair wd1 open the meeting to receive public testimony 1 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE 99 ISSUANCE OF MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(CSCDA)FOR GLEN JONES SENIOR APARTMENTS TO BE LOCATED AT 7125 AMETHYST. NORTH OF BASE LINE P374 RESOLUTION NO. 02-229 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING THE FREEDOM'S FLAME PROJECT AND THE CITY'S OFFER TO BE CONSIDERED AS THE HOST CITY FOR THE WEST COAST MEMORIAL WHEREAS, in response to the devastating attacks of September 11, 2001, the American people have become united in their desire to commemorate those who died in the attacks, and WHEREAS, the Freedom's Flame Foundation is a nonprofit, charitable organization created for the purpose of establishing two memorials recognizing the brave fire fghters, police, emergency personnel and avilians who tragically lost their lives on September 11, and WHEREAS, the Freedom's Flame Foundation will be financed by private donations and not by public monies, and WHEREAS, there will be two monuments erected One will reside on the West Coast and one will be presented to New York City on behalf of the people of the Urnted States, and WHEREAS, Freedom's Flame is a nationwide protect that thousands of people have endorsed by both monetary contributions and emotional support, and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California is a very progressive community and supportive of art in public places Freedom's Flame will be a beautiful piece of art that will attract visitors from around the globe, and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is ideally situated with excellent public access NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES to endorse the protect and offers to be the host city for the West Coast memorial and will consider sites such as its Central Park Please see fh¢ /ollowing page /or lormal adoption, certification and slgnafur¢5 P375 Resolution No 02-229 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7'" day of Augusi 2002 AYES Alexander, Biane, Dutton, Williams NOES• None ABSENT Curatalo ABSTAINED: Nc ATTEST: De ra J Adams MC Cd Clerk Y I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 7'" day of August 2002 Executed this 8'" day of August 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J Adam CMC, Cdy Clerk P376 City Counctl Minutes Aucust 7, 2002 Page 3 011 Approval to award and execution of Professional Services Agreement to RMA (CO 02-083) for Soils and Matenals Tesfing for the Communlty Facihhes Distnct infrastructure improvements related to Phase to of CFD 2001-01 generally located north of Foothill Blvd ,south of Base Line Rd ,east of Day Creek Channel and west of Eliwanda Avenue, to be funded from Acct 1612-3035300 (Fund 6 i 2 - CFD 2001-01) for the amount of 587,870 00 (579,880 00 plus 10% contingency of 57,990 00) 012 Approval and execution of Right of Access and Grading Agreement between the Community Facddies Distnct 2001-01 and Viclona Arbors LLC (CO 02-084) to allow for the grading operations to occur m conluncUOn with Community Faahhes District 2001-01 -Phase 1A 013 Approval and execution of Right of Access and Grading Agreement between the Communiiy Facilities District 2001-01 and City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (CO 02.085) to allow for the grading operations to occur in conjunction with Community Facilities District 2001-01 -Phase 1A 014 Approval and execution of Right of Access and Grading Agreement between the Communlty Facilities District 2001-01 and Cucamonga 220 LLC (CO 02-086) to allow for the grading operations to occur in conjunction with Communty Facihhes Distncl 2001-01 -Phase 1A 015 Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 00-06, submtlted by Cabot Industrial Properties, L P ,located on Arrow Route, east of I-15 RESOLUTION NO 02-227 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 00-06 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 016 Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond (cash), retaining 5580 00 as a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Parcel Map i 5529, submtlted by Fred A Nelson, Jr and Urai S Nelson, located at the southern terminus of Pilgnm Court, south of 19`" Street RESOLUTION NO 02-228 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15529 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 017 Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15970, located on the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Pepperidge Lane, submitted by Reiny Schneider 018 Approval of a Resolution endorsing the Freedom Flame project and the Clty's offer to be considered as the host aty for the West Coasf Memorial RESOLUTION NO 02-229 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENDORSING THE FREEDOM FLAME PROJECT AND THE CITY'S OFFER TO BE CONSIDERED AS THE HOST CITY FOR THE WEST COAST MEMORIAL P377 City Council Minutes August 7, 2002 Page 4 MOTION Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of item D4 Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent) DISCUSSION OF ITEM D4. APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BANYAN STREET AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANCA 685, LLC ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION Staff report presented by Joe O'Ned, Cdy Engineer Councilmember Dutton stated he wanted to draw attention to this because he felt it was a nice protect MOTION Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve item D4 Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent) Mayor Alexander asked the Cily Manager to comment on item D18 approved above Jack Lam, City Manager, gave a staff report on this item Mayor Alexander commended Dennis Stout for the wondertul fob he has done on this Dennis Stout thanked the Council for their support He stated it is going to be a long journey and a lot of money to do this ...... E CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted ..:... F ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1 AMETHYST, NORTH OF BASE LINE Staff report presented by Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst Councilmember Biane mgwred as to what the anticipated stars and completion date for this would be Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst, stated it should start in December or January and be completed within twelve months Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing There being no response, the public hearing was closed CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 21, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. ~ THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following Items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input 1 CONSIDERATION OF LANDMARK DESIGNATIONS DRC-2005- 00777 AND DRC-2005-00776 - CHRIS NICHOLS - A 321 recommendaUOn to initiate Historic Landmark Designations for 9532 Roberd's Ct for the original Roberd's House, located at 9532 Roberd's Ct, and 7201 Amethyst St, the Nazarene Church (second Roberd's House), located at 7201 Amethyst St as Designated Local Landmarks-APN 202-161-05&APN 202-161-04 2 CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2D00-03 331 (RANCHO SUMMIT) 2D05 SPECIAL TAX BONDS AND APPROVAL OF THE FORMS OF THE FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND OTHER TRANSACTIONAL DOCUMENTS RESOLUTION NO OS-278 337 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BONDS OF THE DISTRICT, APPROVING THE FORM OF FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have keen requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input 1 COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councllmember.) 2 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING THE POTENTIAL HOSTING OF THE f~a-~aI®li*i~y FCAME MEMORIAL 569 AT CENTRAL PARK (CONTWUED FROM JULY 6, 2005) P378 P379 ~~ ~,,*, r ~~~; ~= i + ,{.~ ~ ~, R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COhIMUN1TY sERViCEB Staff Report DATE: September 21, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Commun+ty Services Duector SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING THE POTENTIAL HOSTING OF THE `~:~~- ~ ~ ~'i~`? FLAME MEMORIAL AT CENTV~AL PARK RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council cons+der the following alternatives regarding the potential hosting of the Freedom's Flame Memorial at Central Park and prowde direct+on to staff Alternative 1) -approve the future use of Central Park for the Freedom's Flame sculpture component only and permit the installation of an informational sign at thes time_ Alternative 2) -direct staff to research and propose potential alternate sites within the City for the Freedom's Flame sculpture BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS On July 6, 2005, a representative of the Freedom`s Flame Foundation addressed the City Council with a request to post an informational sign at Central Park indocating this facility as the future home of the Freedom's Flame Memonal At that City Cmuncil meeting, staff clarified that the City Council had not taken any previous action to approve the use of Central Park for the FreecJom's Flame Memonal The Council had prem+ously indicated their general support for the Freedom's Elaine program and offered to serve as the west coast location for such a tribute Additionally, the City Council had previously offered to consider locations including Central Park for this memorial At the July 6. 2005, City Council meeting, Councdmembers directed staff to conduct additional research with flhe Freedom's Flame Foundation representatives regarding the scope of the project, the potential design impact of including this memorial at Central Park and to obtain more specofic information about the fundraising efforts of the Foundation City staff met w+th Mr Dennis Stout, who is the current Chairman of 4he Freedom`5 Flame Foundation, on July 21, 2005, for a very detailed discussion on the efforts arnd vision of the Freedom's Elaine Foundation Following is a summary of these discussons P380 FREEDOM'S FLAfv1E MEIv10RIAL September 2l, 2005 Page 2 The Freedom's Flame Foundation is a 501 (c) 3non-profit foundation formed to raise funds for the Freedom's Flame Memorial There are currently seven members on the Founaiation Board of Directors and approximately 25 core volunteers working on these fundraising efforts There are currently no paid staff members working for the Foundation, but Mr- Stout did indicate a future goal of hiring paid staff when fundraising efforts reach approxirsmately $250,OD0 According to Mr Stout, the Foundation hopes to reach that fundraising milestone in the near future To date, expenditures from the Foundation have been limited to costs associated with transportation and insurance The current fundraising goal for the Foundation is $15 million for the design, development and installation of two Freedom's Flame sculptures, one to be located in Rancho Cucamonga and the second intendled for New York City Attached as Exhibit No 1, is a rendering of the proposed sculpture Ifl is the hope of the Foundation to complete fundraising efforts for the two sculptures and complete the installation within a period of four to seven years In staffs discussion with Mr Stout, he indicated that the vision of the Freedom's Flame Foundation actually includes two motor components The first and most highly dlesired component is the commissioning and installation of the Freedom's Flame sculpture discussed above The request from the Foundation io the City for use of Central dark is currently limited to this sculpture component only In addition to the sculpture pieces, the Foundation also holds a vision for the future design and construction of a sigo~ificant museum facility at Central Park associated with the sculpture The vision for the public museum component would include the public display of the many art~facis ihafl were collected following the September 11, 2001, tragedy as volunteers drove from New Xork to Rancho Cucamonga These artifacts include not only the large pieces of steel obtainecB from the World Trade Center site and a New York Fire Department engine which was destroyed, but they also would include the many items donated to the caravan ais they traveled through the United States including items such as sections of the airplane whictro crashed in Pennsylvania, individual family bibles and remembrances of family members who were killed in the tragedy The Foundation's vision for a museum would also include a display facility for traveling exhibits emanating from the Smithsonian museum Also included in this proposed museum facility would be other items of public interest relating tin public safety Mr Stout stressed that the sculpture component of the protect is their Ihighestt priority At the July 21s~ meeting with Mr Stout, the Landscape Architect for Central Park, Mr Bob Mueiing of RJM Design Group, was also in attendance to assist stall with understandling the potential design considerations associated with the Freedom's Flame Foundation visiion As a result of the July 215' meeting, and subsequent discussions, staff and the Landscape Architect have developed some extremely preliminary thoughts on the types and arrnount of space the Foundation wsion might require ai Central Park Generally it is felt as if the Freedom's Flame sculpture component would require a space of approximately 100) feet irn length and width or approximately 10,000 square feet During the initial conceptual) design of the Phase I improvements at Central Park, a potential location was identified in th.e eventt that the City Council were to approve the future installation of the Freedom's. Flame P381 FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL September 21, 2005 Page 3 sculpture This potential location is shown on the attached site plan as Exhibit No 2 Back during fhe conceptual design process for Phase I improvements, staff and the landscape architect reviewed this potential site with Mr Sioui and all agreed that it would be a good location for the sculpture, if eventually approved by the Ciiy Council The vision for the museum facility is certainly much more difficult to evaluate in terms of size since the concept is so general at this lime In conversation with Mr Stout, however, he could envision using a footprint at Central Park of approximately 40,000 square feet with the museum facility being possibly two to three stories in height, with a portion of the facility possibly being constructed underground The Central Park Landscape Architect was asked io evaluate this potential component in terms of location and massing on the facility within the Phase 1 improvement area Also included in Exhibit No 2 is the potential location of the museum component if eventually approved by the City Council. The exhibd indicates a footprint of slightly less than 40,000 square feet While it is felt that the sculpture component envisioned by the Foundation could be adequately served by the park's existing 550 parking spaces, it is obvious that the potential future creation of a museum complex would require significantly more parking spaces to be created on the park. Based upon the potential vision of a three-story museum on a 40,000 square foot footpnnt, a preliminary discussion with a museum consultant indicated the potential need for between 300 to 400 additional parking spaces over what is currently developed on site The Landscape Architect suggests that the most appropriate way to accommodate this parking without sacrificing significant portions of the open space would be the design and construction of a three level parking structure close to the proposed museum location The potential location of that parking structure, which would replace a portion of the existing senior center parking lot, is also shown on Exhibit No 2 Exhibit No 3 m this report shows a very conceptual section showing the potential massing relationship between the existing senior center building and a proposed parking structure on grade During the July 21 s1 meeting with Mr Stout he reminded City staff and the Central Park Landscape Architect chat the original vision for the Central Park improvements did include the construction of on-site parking structures to serve the buildings on the eastern portion of the park Mr Stout also reminded staff and the Architect that the original vision for Central Park included a number of public buildings, including a fine arts center on the southeastern portion of the park which was referred to as the Omni Center The original vision for the Omni Censer included more than 500,000 square feet of public facddies The ewstmg senior and community center budding built as part of the Phase I improvements, is approximately 57,000 square feet- While the Freedom's Flame Foundation has estimated the cost to develop the two sculptures would be approximately $15 million, there is no cost estimate available for the potential design and construction of the museum portion of their vision During the July 21s' meeting with Mr Stout staff inquired as to the Foundatuon's vision in terms of ownership and operation of the Freedom's Flame facilities, if eventually approved by the City Council. Mr Stout noted that the current thought would be for the Foundation io raise the funds to cover the total costs of the design, development and construction of the proposed facilities, including all infrastructure needs These facdiUes would then be donated by the Foundation to the Cdy for ownership At that point, maintenance, liability P382 FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL September 29, 2005 Page 4 and other responsibilities for the sculpture and the museum would become the responsibility of the City or potentially of anon-profit organization that could be formed for that purpose As requested by the City Council at the July 6'" meeting staff, the Landscape Architect, and Mr Stout held a discussion on whether the proposed Freedom's Flame imprmvemenis would be compatible with the current master plan for Central Park It was agreed that the sculpture component envisioned by the Foundation would appropriately work wish the current design and would provide an appropriate amenity associated with the cascading lake feature to be built in future phases at the park The 10,000 square Soot area envisioned as necessary for the sculpture component was considered during the cmnceptual planning for the park and would easily be designed info the park surroundings What is harder to determine at this point is the potential impact of the proposed museum component on the park The two most significant impacts determined at this lime wou9d be the construction of the buildings on the currently developed open space area northwest of the senior and community center, as well as the additional parking structure which would most likely be requved adjacent to the proposed museum complex Staff and the Landscape Architect believe that the park amenities which are planned for a future phase of the Central Park west of the current road, which would include restrooms, a small parking area, security lighting, etc , would be sufficient to accommodate the sculpture component of the Freedom's Flame Memorial The potential museum facilities would definitefry require additional infrastructure in these areas The City Counal is reminded that there is currently no funding available for the future phase development of Central Park west of the current roadway and it is unknown at what 1~me the facilities will be expanded westward Another very important item in considering the potential development of facilities envisioned by the Foundation would be the increased attendance that might be generated at Central Park In discussions with Mr Stout, the Freedom's Flame,.Foundation envisions that thousands of casual visitors would 6e expected to visit the potential sculpture and/or museum component each year In addition to the casual drop-in visitors would be the potential for having special events assocated with the sculpture and/or the museum Mr Stout stated that it is part of the vision of the Foundation to possibly have significant special events at the memorial facilities on appropriate occasions While no one could predict the potential attendance impacts of such special events, all agreed that ~t world not be uncommon to potentially attract up to 5,000 to 10,000 people for a significant everri Events of this scale would require additional planning for parking and infrastructure faciFties The traffic and noise impacts to the neighborhood would have to be carefully considered As part of the July 21st discussion with Mr Stout, he nosed that it is the belief of the Freedom's Flame Foundation that development of the sculpture and/or museum components would result m signficant marketing and publicity exposure for the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, in addition to offering a fitting tribute to the tragedy which occurred on September 11, 2001 Mr Stout expressed his desire for the Foundation and the City to develop a partnership to work together on the development of these Freedom's Flame Memorial components P383 FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL September 2l, 2005 Page 5 The request before the City Counal from the Freedom's Flame Foundation is only to approve Central Park as the future location of the sculpture and to permit the installation of an informational sign at this time Sernces Director Attachments I ICOMMSERNCoundBBaa~tlslCMCOUna(`ShMtepOrtsV005lFe[QTmsFlame OH~T05 tlx Exxisir No. z P385 \ i s ,~•~, ~t"`1 1 'ry,., ~ (1"'"i ",'y ~.~ ~a,Jt. 5,. ~ =_~Lr. ~ i /"l 'i ~ ' ~ ~~i •~ •~ ~ -, ~ .ti '.\ ~1, r w i ~ /~. ~l ~~ %hy~~vtggl }.4<}y~ 1 ..._'1 i j .,~1 r~"(t' ~ 'COX` / i•,,,~ .„)'<'!~^~ w 5 h 1 ... "~, i 1\ ~\ ~ ; .lfl.y"1 i ~~ ~.~/ ~~X,/.% h~~ /'tx~yt~; t e r~ A ~^~ c. ~ ' `y 'x~O 1 ~ `1K 5 '' • viii( 11 _ 1;-"-:` ~.. _ ^, ~~s\•/¢"-..,'~, ~' k 5 `. 't Rw-, y, /' ~ ~ ~ ,'' ~~` F `rte ' ~%^~ s ~ ~ ~,i ~ ,,y V .;5 ' ~ _< ~~ ~, f ~ 8 a ! .hut ~ ,'~ , v ,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ , t ~ o a. f" .~, r ~ . __ _ ~-.J A ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ r ~ L}~ -. f'a ~ ~ ~ .~ ~~~ ~ .~ N ~ ~' •' , i~~ 5 ~ 1 ~~~ '~ot-~. Y`~ r l . t ~ 1 r in _"Sn ~ t P386 5er1/I07~G~'l~ GfOi'0~ /'/tl°~/N6 5/1WGN/`E MICG~FBN P387 Cdy Council Minutes September 21, 2005 Page 11 Ken Wilson, 9548 Roberds, hoped that it would not be landmark status so he could do whatever he wanted to with the property He was not in favor of this designation Robert Bathish, owner of 7201 Amethyst, stated they had purchased the property from Mrs Roberds He stated it was their intent to improve this property, but later felt it was going to cost too much for what the property was worth He stated he strongly opposes this proposed designaLon There being no further Input, public comments were closed MOTION Moved by Michael seconded by Spagnolo to approve the landmark designation Motion carried 3-1-0-1 (Alexander voted no, Williams abstained) ........ Councilmember Williams returned to the meeting at 11 08 p m RESOLUTION NO OS-276 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT), AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BONDS OF THE DISTRICT, APPROVING THE FORM OF FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION \NITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS MOTION Moved by A4ichael, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No 05-278 Motion carried unanimously 5-0 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1 COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be ilmited to three minutes per Councilmember ) No comments were made 12 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING THE POTENTIAL HOSTING OF THE FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL AT CENTRAL PARK (CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 2DD5) A staff report was presented by Kevin McArdle, Commurnty Services Director Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input Addressing the City Council was A staff report was presented by Ingnd Bruce, GIS/Speaal Distracts Manager P388 Crty Council Minutes September 21, 2005 Page 12 Dennis Stout talked about a possible memorial at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and stated that City is considering a donation of 510 million He felt this protect is very important He stated the Chamber of Commerce and many others have endorsed this He felt it is important for the City to get national recognition for this type of a monument He felt d would help them m their efforts if this is approved by the City Council He also added the archdect for this protect has recommended this site to him Counclmember Spagnolo stated there is no doubt where his heart hes wdh this protect since he was a fireman himself He felt the design of this depicts truly what happened at the World Trade Center He felt this is an opportunity to show this community what Rancho Cucamonga is about He fell tnis is very significant and that you cannot put a price tag on this He stated he would like to see this approved as recommended by the Freedom's Flame Foundation Conclmember Gutierrez asked what would happen if the commitment for this protect no longer existed after several years, would there be the ability to alter this plan Mayor Alexander said nothing is irrevocable and a motion could be made to change this He stated if would not be bound by law Counclmember Michael stated if this doesn't succeed, something else could go in at that site He asked rf Mr Stout was going to get other elected officals supporting this protect Dennis Stout said if the City approves this, he would talk to legislators to see how they can help He hoped that sponsors could also help build this Counclmember Michael said he does have a concern about who would maintain this He stated he is also concerned that Centra~ Park turn from a community park to a regional park He stated he would support this recommendation and fell d should have a Resolution to confirm this He felt the Park and Recreation Commission should also look at this site He felt there should be restrictions on the size of the sign also Counclmember Williams asked about the size of the sign and did not want it to lake over the park Dennis Stout stated he was thinking about a 4 x B sign Counclmember Williams stated she remembers there being a Veteran's memoral at this park, and did not want that forgotten She stated there are still Veterans waiting for this to happen She did not want the Veterans offended MOTION Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to approve staffs alternative recommendation Number 1 and that a Resolution be drafted to come back at the next meeting Motion carried unanimously 5-0, and to include Counclmember Michael's recommendation for the Park and Recreation Commission to review this J. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to adtourn Motion carried unanimously 5-0 The meeting adtourned at 11 39 p m in memory of Eddie Cortez, Mayor of Pomona Respectfully submitted, Debra J Adams, CMC, City Clerk Approved --- -' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA , ~ A OCTOBER 5, 200 - 7:00 P.M. _ 2 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY C[~ Gyp CAMONG HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 3 Approval of a Resolution in support of the Freedom I~-u~-- Sculpture 27 and approval of Central Park as the location of the West Coast Memorial Sculpture RESOLUTION NO 05-279 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CENTRAL PARK AS THE FUTURE LOCATION FOR THE FREEDOM FLAME SCULPTURE 4 Approval of plans and speafications for roof repairs to the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter in the amount of $10,000 funded from 29 Acct No 10250D1-5602 (Capital Reserve), and authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inwhng Bids" as approved m the FY 05/06 budget RESOLUTION NO. OS-280 30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROOF REPAIRS TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL SHELTER AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5 Approval for the purchase of one (1) graffiti removal vehicle from Dispensing Technology Corporation In the amount of $100,673 60 and 34 authorization to appropriate $1D0,67360 into Acct Nos 1244-302- 5604 (Capital Outlay Vehicles) and 1244-000-4740 (Grant Income) in the Code Enforcement Grant Program Fund 6 Approval of the Annexation lD Landscape Maintenance District Nos 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos 1 and 2 for 8198 36 Avenida Velar located on the north side of Avenida Velar east of Grove Avenue, submitted by Dario and Socorro Luna RESOLUTION NO 05-281 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS 1 AND 2 FOR 8198 AVENIDA VEJAR (APN 0207-161-09} 7 Approval of the Annexation t0 Landscape Maintenance District Nos 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos 1 and 2 for 10117 26`" 46 Street, located on the south sloe of 26'" Street, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by John and Monica Padilla P389 P390 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A COPIMUNITY SERVICES StaffReport DATE: October 5, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Clty Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL AND APPROVAL OF CENTRAL PARK AS THE LOCATION OF THE WEST COAST MEMORIAL RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Clty Council adopt the proposed Resolution in support of the Freedom's Flame Memonal and approval of Central Park as the location of the west coast memorial BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On September 21, 2005, City Council voiced their support of the Freedom's Flame Memonal proposed by the Freedom's Flame Foundation At that meeting the Councl also approved the location of Central Park for the west coast memorial to be designed, manufactured and rnstalied by the Freedom's Flame Foundation and directed staff to prepare a Resolution indicating such approval The attached Resolution provides formal approval by Council of the Freedom's Ftame protect and identifies Central Park as the location for the west coast memorial Respectfully submitted, . ~~~~~ Ke n McArdle Community Services Director P391 RESOLUTION NO. OS-279 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CENTRAL PARK AS THE FUTURE LOCATION FOR THE r~;3~~Za1i.Y-9 FLAME MEMORIAL WHEREAS, on September 11, 2001, the United States experienced sudden and tragic loss of human life at the hands of foreign terrorists in New York, Washington, D C and Pennsylvania, and WHEREAS, the Freedom's Flame Foundation, anon-profit organization, was established to raise funds for the design and installation of two identical memorials that will be a remembrance of the tragic events of September 11'" and pay tribute to those who displayed extraordinary courage in the face of overwhelming disaster, one memorial to be displayed on the west coast and one on the east coast, and WHEREAS, the Ffeedoin"s Fla"m"e Foundation, is committed to raising funds to pay for alt costs associated with the design, manufacturing and installation of the City Counal- approved design concept for the sculptures, and WHEREAS, the City Councl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on September 21, 2005, voted unanimously to reaffirm its previously stated offer to be the host for the west coast site for the Freedom's Flame Memonal, to support the Freedom"s Flame Foundation efforts to bwld the Memonal and to designate a specific sde in Central Park, indicated as Freedom's Flame Plaza m the agenda item exhibit which is part of the public record of the September 21, 2005, City Council meeting, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga believes that the Freedom Flame sculpture would be a meaningful addition to the future design of Central Park, and WHEREAS, in addition to the site designation, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has authorized the Freedom's Flarime Foundation to install a temporary informational sign regarding the upcoming memorial sculpture at Central Park, for a length of time to be determined by the Ciiy, and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Commission will work with the Freedom's Flame Foundation in reviewing the desgn, location and timeframe for displaying the informational signage at Central Park, as well as other issues associated with the installation of the memorial ai Central Park, and NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga designates Central Park as the chosen sde for the west coast Freedorri s Flarne Memonal Please see foe lollowmg page !or Iormal adoption, certdicabon and mgna Wres P392 Resolution No 05-279 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5'" day of October 2005 AYES. Alexander, Gutierrez, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None (~P William J Alexander, Mayor ATTEST• ~'~-~ ~~~ ebra J A a s, CMC, City Clerk 1, DEBRA J ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said Cdy Counctl held on the 5~' day of October 2005 Executed this 6~' day of October 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California ~~ D bra J Ad ' ,CMC, Gty Clerk P393 Cdy Council Minutes October 5, 2005 Page 4 C8 Eric Noreen of the Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Association wanted fo let the Council know of then need for additional personnel and equipment so they can do their fob of serving the people He felt the Chief was searching for the appropriate funding to pay for these things and asked the Counal to help find the funding C9 A man from 19`" Street and San Benito asked that Highland be kept closed He stated he loves the community and its peacefulness and wanted to keep it that way C10 Alan Ansara, 19`" Street and Haven area, stated he supported the efforts of Alan Hostetter and his neighbors He stated there is no way he wants Highland reopened C11 John Lyons, Efiwanda area of the City, stated his heart and prayers go out to Nicole Myerchin, animal activist, for her loss He wanted to talk about the new fire station on Day Creek and Base Line He gave a little history about this station and how it came about He stated he ran a campaign to keep Highland open, and m exchange for that, he got the auxiliary Lane on the 210 Freeway He po~nled out this street is the only way people can travel along the freeway east and west He felt it was important to reopen it tar emergency purposes C12 Bill McCliman stated he is frustrated that some of the Councilmembers ignore those people that are speaking He stated on Saturday there was a riot situation on the soccer field and he spoke to the Police Department about this He felt there should be some funds earmarked for foot patrol at the park by the Police Department He stated the $377,000 to be given to the County for the transition could be used for better patrol at the park He stated we need more police officers in the City He asked the Council when the strategic plan would come back at a meeting and how will it be paid for Mayor Alexander asked him to talk to Chief Bryan to find out how the strategic plan will be paid for He stated his heart goes out to Nicole Myerchin as well C13 Jeff Noel stated he is against the reopening of Highland He felt iT the streets were reopened, his neighborhood would be an island and would create more problems He asked that this remain closed C14 Elizabeth Rynear, San Benito, felt Highland should remain closed because if d is reopened d would create more iraffc problems She stated this is really a safety issue D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager stated item D79 has an amended agreement that has been distributed to the Counal for their cons~deratfon D1 Approval of Minutes September 7, 2005 September 20, 2005 (Special Meeting) D2 Approval of Warrants, Register September 14 through September 27, 2005, and Payroll ending September 27, 2005 for the total amount of $8,152,260 33 D3 Approval of a Resolution in support of the Freedom's Flame Memorial and approval of Central Park as the location of the West Coast Memorial RESOLUTION NO 05-279 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CENTRAL PARK AS THE FUTURE LOCATION FOR THE FREEDOM'S FLAME MEMORIAL P394 Cdy Councl Minutes October 5, 2005 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO 05-292 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION Moved by Wdhams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the stab recommendations In the staff reports contained within the- Consent Calendar including the correction to item D19 Motion carved unanimously 5-0 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1 CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION AMENDING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-01 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-03 FOR MARGARITA BEACH LOCATED AT 9950 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN 1077- 621-34 (CONTINUED BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO NOVEMBER 2, 2005, IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO PREPARE ) Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this was requested to be continued at the last meeting and the City Council voted to continue this item to the November 2, 2D05 meeting He stated this is on the agenda because it had already been advertised G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No dems submdted H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS STAFF REPORT CITY MANAGERS OFFICE Date: February 21, 2007 To: Mayor andMe[mbers of the City Council From: Jacke~~ J` J Manager Pam a ,Assistant City Manager Subject Navigational Tracking Systems P395 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Vehicle navigational tracking systems, installed on City vehicles, allow cities to more effectively management their fleets and allocation of resources The use of these types of systems was brought up at the recent January 2007 Goal setting Session and the City Council asked staff to develop a recommended program to be brought back to the City Council as part of the 2007-08 Budget consideration If the City Council approves the program, then City staff would complete a Request for Proposal (RFP) for solicitation of bids and acquisition of equipment according to the developed program of work Cc Mahdi Aluzri, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Official Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager