Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2001/09/26 - Agenda Packet
~u u • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- "- PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Maaas Coin Mannenno _ Com Stewart _ Com. Tolstoy II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 12, 2001 Adjourned Meeting of September 12, 2001 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The /ollowmg Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial They wtll be acted on by the Commission at one bins without d~scuss~on if anyone has concern over any item, rt should be removed for d~sscusson A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -The proposed project is the development of approximately 7 miles of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, aClass Imulti-use bicycle, pedestrian, and separated equestrian trail located within the existing Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way, which varies m width from 80 feet to 100 feet, within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga. The project also includes the acgwsition of the historic Etiwanda Station for preservation as a museum, and the potential acgwsition or use of the historic Casa De Cucamonga, for use as a future transportation park-n-ride and tradhead. The total area of development of the trail is approximately 85 acres. The total area of development associated with the use of the Etiwanda Station for preservation as a museum, park-n-ride, or staging area for the Trail is approximately 4 acres, for a total of 89 acres of development Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (TO BE CONTINUED) B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00262 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16239 consisting of 109 single-family lots on 20 15 acres of land in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community Plan, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN• 227-691-01• Related files. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16239 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2001-00263 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from September 12, 2001) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following dems are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wad to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman and address the COmmISSlon by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be l~mded to 5 minutes per ind~v~dual for each pro/ect Please sign in afferspeaking C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16239 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC - A request to subdivide 20.15 acres of land into 109 lots for the purpose of single-family home construction in the Low-Medium District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community Plan, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue -APN. 227-691-01. Related files• Development Review DRC2001-00262 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2001-00263. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from September 12, 2001) D. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Very Low and Estate Residential Districts lot basic development standards to facilitate horse keeping Related File. Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00505 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH -The development of an 18,260 square foot church with sanctuary and classrooms for Sunday School programs on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 9101 19th Street -APN 202-041-41 Related File. Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00426 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • • • Page 2 r 1 LJ • • F AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC - A request to modify certain sections of the development agreement regarding the timing of construction of speafic infrastructure improvements, generally located north of Interstate 210 between Hanley Avenue and Day Creek Channel -Tentative Tract Maps 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902 G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534 -CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST - A request to amend the circulation within the Industnal Park District (Subarea 6), to eliminate Center Avenue between 6th Street and Trademark Street. Related Fdes• Development Code Amendment Development Review DRCDR00-41, Industnal Area Speafic Plan Amendment 00-02, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00394 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration H GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -The City of Rancho Cucamonga has completed the Draft City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update. The Protect Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres) as well as its Sphere-of-Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City This update includes changes in land use designations as well as updates to the pollees and programs within all elements the City's General Plan. The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres innon-residential uses Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18 acres Within the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres in non-residential uses. With the implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i.e ,future) development would occur with build out approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commeraal, approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi-public uses, and approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways. The ProfecUPlanning Area includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its Sphere-of-Influence area located directly to the north. The City is located in the southwest corner of San Bernardino County, 13 miles west of downtown San Bernardino The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, and the communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the City to the west, south and east, respectively. Total acreage within City boundaries is approximately 24,000 acres. Total acreage within the Sphere-of- Influence is approximately 7,700 acres Total profecUplanning area comprises approximately 31,700 acres This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and Findings of Page 3 Overriding Considerations have been prepared for this Protect and will be reviewed and a recommendation forwarded to the City Council (Continued from September 12, 2001) VI. NEW BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-41 -CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST -The development of an 830,000 square foot industrial building on 39 96 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), located on the south side of 6th Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues -APN 210-072-06, 11, 16, 17, and 35. Related Files Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 00-02, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00394 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. J. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00160 - CRUMBAKER RESIDENCE - A request to construct a 4,343 square foot single family home on .60 acre of land within Tract 11626 in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5051 Lomas Court -APN. 1061-821-09 VII. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS K TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER APPOINTMENT VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the hme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment hme If items go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Comm~ss~on 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of fhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 20, 2001, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~wc Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga I~ • Page 4 Vicinity Map Planning Commission September 26, 2001 J I; ,: I~ Hillside Banyan 19th/210 F' • Foothill G and I .-~. m w 4th -a c ~ ~ ~ Y ` _ Q Item D: Very Low & Estate Residential Districts Only Item H: City-wide ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga F Wilson Inland Empire Trail :line B and C * ~~ /~ ESTATE pFCioErrnaL /~ _ VERY LOW RE9DENl1AL PaeNlc Elecbic In1aM Empire Tnl4 Ranclw Lunmonpa tepmant 1~ 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO ITEM TITLE PAGES Agenda 2 - 6 A Environmental Assessment for Pacrfic Electric Inland Empire Trail 7 - 8 B - C Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16239 Development Review 2001 - 00262 g - 136 D Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549 137 - 146 E Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00082 147 - 214 F Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 215 - 227 G Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534 228 - 271 H General Plan Amendment 99-07 8 Environmental Impact Report 272 - 300 I Development Review DRCDR00-41 301 - 366 J Development Review DRC2001-00160 367 - 388 K Trails Advisory Committee Member Appointment 389 - 390 • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE September 26, 2001 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, ASLA, Clty Planner BY Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -The proposed protect is the development of approximately 7 miles of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, a Class Imulti-use bicycle, pedestrian, and separated equestrian trail located within the existing Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way, which varies in width from 80 feet to 100 feet, within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga. The protect also includes the acquisition of the historic Etiwanda Station for preservation as a museum, and the potential acquisition or use of the historic Casa De Cucamonga, for use as a future transportation park-n-ride and trailhead The total area of development of the trail is approximately 85 acres. The total area of development associated with the use of the Etiwanda Station for preservation as a museum, park-n-ride, or staging area for the Trail is approximately 4 acres, for a total of 89 acres of development PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Project The installation of amulti-purpose trail along an abandoned railroad corridor. The proposed protect will include the following construction activities. 1 Construct a Class I bike path from Grove Avenue to I-15 Freeway. 2 Construct ahiking/equestrian trail from Cucamonga Creek to easterly city limits. 3 Install lighting 4. Install signs, mileage markers, and historic displays. 5 Install landscaping and irrigation 6. Install historic signs and displays. 7. Install trail amenities, including water fountains, benches, trash cans, etc. 8 Install a hierarchy of street crossings, which may include striping, warning signs, flashing beacons, traffic signals, or grade separations 9. Install trailhead facilities, including parking, restrooms, water fountains, benches, trash cans, etc • 10. Reserve a 45-foot wide area for future rail service ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL - CITY OF RC September 26, 2001 Page 2 B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Various South - Various East - Various West - Various C. General Plan Designations. Protect Site - Class I Bicycle Path and Community Trail (hiking and riding) North - Various South - Various East - Various West - Various D. Site Characteristics• The Southern Pacific (former Pacific Electric Railway) corridor bisects the middle of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in generally an east-west direction. The rails have been removed and this abandoned corridor has become blighted and has caused law enforcement, weed abatement, and fire protection problems. The corridor contamsnon-native and ruderal plant species. The Casa de Cucamonga (a County Museum listed m the National Register of Historic Places) adtoins the south side of the corridor, east of Vineyard Avenue. The historic Etiwanda Station adtoms the corridor's north side at Etiwanda Avenue n U ANALYSIS: The protect will eliminate problems of blight, crime, and property damage assoaated with the current abandoned status of the railroad corridor Current burdens upon City enforcement services would be dramatically reduced and the overall appearance would be significantly improved. Implementation of the protect will reduce traffic m the community and region by providing for alternative forms of transportation; will establish an attractive recreational faality; Imk other bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian trails m the City and the region; and provide a means of direct access to the City's largest planned park, nearby parks, schools, and shopping centers. The protect includes the potential acgwsition or lease of the Casa de Cucamonga and Etiwanda Station for use as tradhead facilities The existing Casa de Cucamonga parking lot is suitable if resealed and striped. The Etiwanda Station sits on 4 acres of land suitable for parking and trail rest area faalities The Station could be renovated into a Pacific Electric Railway museum. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission continue this item to October 10, 2001 in order for staff to complete additional environmental documents. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC.mig ~°~ city o f aacho Cucamonga • Staff Report DATE September 26, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJEI',T: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16239 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC -A request to subdivide 20 15 acres of land into 1091ots forthe purpose of single-family home construction in the Low-Medum (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victona Community Plan, located at the northeast comer of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue -APN 227-691-01 Related files Development Rewew DRC2001- 00262 and Victona Community Plan Amendment DRC2001-00263. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2001-00262 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16239 consisting of 109 single-family lots on 20 15 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victona Community Plan, located at the northeast comerof Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue APN 227-691-01 Related files Tentative Tract Map 16239 and Victona Community Plan Amendment DRC2001-00263 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Density 5 4 dwelling units per acre B Sun-oundmg Land Use and Zonmo North - Low Residential (2~ dwelling units per acre) South - Neighborhood Commercal East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Future park C General Plan Designations Project Site -Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Neighborhood Commercial East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Future park D Site Charactenstics The site is vacant and relatively flat, and slopes to the southerlydirection at a rate of approximately 2 percent The street frontages are improved with pavement, curb and gutter ITEMS B,C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 16239 -DIVERSIFIED September 26, 2001 Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The applicant is proposing to construct 109 single-family homes that will range in size from 1,659 to 2,565 square feet The site will be developed under the Low-Medwm Residential Basic Development Standards of the Victona Community Plan Four house plans are being proposed, each having four different architectural styles Craftsman, Spanish, French, and Traditional All plans have a fireplace in the family room and each has a 2-car garage with a "flex" space that is attached to the garage and may be used as an additional room The vanous configurations are as follows Plan 1 is single-story, 1,659-1,766 square feet, and features a 2-car front-on garage The plan is a three bedroom with an option for a master bedroom retreat The "flex" option to expand includes an additional bedroom or a study Plan 2 is two-story, 2,062 -2,210 square feet, and features a 2-car front-on garage with an option for a front porch The plan is a four bedroom with an option for a master bedroom retreat The "flex" option to expand includes an additional bedroom or study Plan 3 is two-story, 2,254-2,403 square feet, and features a 2-car front-on garage and a front porch on two of the four elevations. The plan is a three bedroom with loft and an optional fourth bedroom Plan 4 is two-story, 2,565-2,743 square feet, and features a 2-car front-0n garage and a . front porch on two of the four elevations The plan is a four bedroom with a loft and an optional bedroom five B Design Review Committee The Committee (McNeil, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the protect on July 17, and July 31, 2001, and recommended approval with conditions, which have been incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval Action comments have been attached for your convenience (Exhibit E) The applicant will present a color board for the decorative stucco return walls at the Commission meeting C Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect July 17, 2001, and on July 31, 2001 The Committee recommended approval subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval D Environmental Assessment The applicant prepared Part I of the Irntial Study and staff completed Part II, the Environmental Checklist A noise study was prepared which identified noise attenuation measures to reduce noise to acceptable levels for Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue Mitigation measures are regwred for lots fronting on Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, including Lots 29-60, which will have a bamer consisting of a combination of earthen berm and block The maximum height of the wall shall be 6 feet with a bean of 1-3 feet This will result in a noise control bamer as regwred by the acoustical analysis Mitgation measures will be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality and noise impacts to a less than significant impact If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dailv • Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site 4, c 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 16239 -DIVERSIFIED • September 26, 2001 Page 3 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING On June 13, 2001, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting mulling all homeowners within 300 feet of the subject property Four homeowners were m attendance The primary issues of concern were dust control during construction (a standard condition of approval regwres dust mitigation) and traffic concerns regarding the additional traffic generated Other questions that were addressed by the applicant pertained to the layout of the homes including slope and the perimeter walls on the northeast side of the property The neighbors generally seemed accepting of the proposed lower density, and the development of single family homes RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract SUBTT16239, and Development Review DRCDR2001-00262 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted B u ler City Planner BB EW~s • Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" -Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" -Grading Plan Exhibit "D" -Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit "E" -Design Review Committee Meeting Action Agenda and Minutes Dated July 17, and July 31, 2001 Exhibit "F" -Environmental Study Resolution of Approval -Tentative Tract Map Resolution of Approval -Development Revew ~1~3 SITE LOCATION MAP a d w~a~,p+ YilEinnl p ~' Y~ O SEYfII aIXEt M~ ~ y _ y15111A1 L-r -i 9' - NIOV.TIOe a, CI 5- _ ~ZJf s ' = 1 I Y Y ~ e'~. - iris s ~l>~ 'u ~3 ~ hf F'p I i. ny'r°~ 1 s ~,~ s m'nr6 ~ r' 30 ,: µ :ia E~Z~ , . n~n~tN°1a0~-:.LL~~ m 1.... n _ a _ - ~ ~ ____ _ ______ ' N f YVM IN iI' I4_ _ ____r?~~- cJr__ ~I C ./ p > a ~I I1C'A(Jp ,I 9' _~_ ii __w~.~a 7i 9~ ,ra n°"°m«'a ~ ~I`, g m' 3 _ !L~°."~ •'°e 'r Fc 1_aludJ'll Ia aYld I 8 is lI _*Ip~ ~ m,` ~ ii ~ ~ses~^yn ~ W . P ....e,, o l~In,_n _7~,n t'j~nmrR:~n •~ ~' `' ' L __ .m~a E w A(~2''y~}}.n.,l'~ : l~" h aN ~1 _~_ 9 Z IFrd `d it } ~ OI niva 2i>,,_~Ii a ~~~, inr ~~~w~ ~~ ve. Oww4 .a. ~1Lb~~.. o., .^ mr ~ ,~~ as >x \ ~?a2~ .. I I a _ , I r SECPPIA dl I i \e~.an.fl G.h i~ j ° , Ire-° ~ ~I J 'iiulu ~ ~atd :' Y ~ ~~ M=n'."~~ ~ / _ e/:'` mY~ 1 ~ k~_n ~ ' ~ I -EO ox ~ iF NOt~~ '> a ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ 'i SSy~ a'i ~-J_ _ p . iEea I ' ] .i .e 'uT (nL'° i0~~~11 yY AVI H GJ H~AM 1 / ' D ~ 1 IZ L A~ ' I .r ~n ~.~q.~~[ °~.q",r! Imp T ~L ~~~l a6 n~wsa N' " ~~ ~ :'R. eo. si ~n='co~° «;~: i ~ ~a ~ I ,Tw G T i o ` ° ,., S ~ ~: ,~o,.~~--,•iE~ ' ~ D ~SMMf IY aJ ,~~ ;~~s .;,~~~~ ~:~'.~ d,,r. ' ~L:~- AM ff : m Y ~ ~.~ w _~ ~.~~~ _ '"~° AV ' .il rays ~` ~ ~ wt °' t lr~~ of 3 ~ ~.~~/ L~ ~~s a VIC7 I° a.„o, ) >~~ ~ 'l"4i n sWu Ln n oa ~~~ ~ ..• g' e e cmua, & 4 ° pacme m ~wsr ~. ~ u.9~ ~ ! p „ rt~W' ~ I fc ® 0 kI,1"H 8 C4~f°,« .!< ~ I ° I`~ uz' 31 I~0 ~i`p~ap ~ ~ ~ e !I_ 'i alCr" ~~ '^ 0~ ' m q.,, ~~ -673+ 3 t~ ~. ll~ c p ~1t ci36 [J ' ° eat In ElK :7~~w to~ 'E !'-° VARI(: lx a u ~ el. lrlunR` a_L )32 v "~ rn°'n ~°`-r , tuu~u I.I r u.q,~ ,8„ ry LL .'1a`- il~t~ r a'~: ~! ak re a s as ~ t` ~'..: '~~fil~' . laiS,~F `a~ 0 ~ W ~ ~ . ~ +'`i" „;w~~ r54 - ~~~~m ~ 8 W'~^ - aitl.i.~ Rani - c '1 ~s . I.I_i p ~Ylr~~r~Y . ~ s`' F ' ~' ~ gp-F~ ^~~~e~~ryeEp ~ 6°fe: i < nS ~nYuCs4 .nlln ~_ T- b~aln ~-~: ' I ~^ ~{i 5 n wa Qxi GI°~ g ~ ~ I I °I 111GWP 6N1 _ ~ ~~ ant-~ "'4..f~ala M - I- nt e v uLLN14 AYM ~ L °G~.~~i~cl_ • ~ Pm>aKu Y '~ PSiv a ~ 3~ J . 3_ ' i ~ a.t~ ~ _S ~''` «~i I~ 'V, ~ [. C h 12 F a j 13r ~Ir i9~ela 51 ~~1rPl ~as J Inl.l u ~m. °, r ' ----- usLlrvn Ar s I S < a ~ty4,4~ ~ ~ _ ~ gp Y+'a y ~"_~37 u. y on ti 'tp¢WdGI '~' r ~ Y+~°sry,-' •~1' i - T ` ~-6~ r a.l ° 'I .o.i:u r1N I~ ' ~ (~ . r ' L E `= :'+ °'~"~` x.nN ~ r L a.ui+ ~ i _ :- s Ils: ss a ~ B SEL NE3 cY _ _ _ _F BASE IN + ,.~I~r,~L~m ~I: ~,., UC .IL. Llw ~; _ :,; ~ ~°~. a ~<<~9°'w,, a i ~ ns . wu ill~IM r m w BL Siy,nulLw_q ~ LL:u -o• _~.a (('~~ ~y'^~ N umb 2 6wi w M "i °n.ar iERRAi'^rvrn t Ow n > °''.'.w2}` of ,+Eaa« 'o"°" np i; x~my. 3~ a , i~ ' 1 I es ~I sEE~ i m~ n u .mm is w u o na 5 r st Vli n ~ P aE StA m J" ws 3 € I' ' 3 ~ ~ • E R p te,'anTr Y e_ 6' i3kf s' m W i 1 y.~ LL m^ I e m,vvaa+., n i raL ll If N ~tt v a I ~ a . Vi ' ;. I1-~".~,..?; .d p .~«~ ~j I EM ` Ll , ~., n °; e®°..w~~! ° a st a,ea l`~•u E n. Lw n lwu n l ;s..wN°e`e.`°.n ~ n ^ e mrman o .~,cs.o.emstt 5 ° pisun°n ~~ nm ~ r : n o rdl"'~l , A a ~ u E_ .v.. ~yY 9 r u ° x ~, .u..i4`"v, ' p'" r a = • - • r ~'~ ~ ~` ar ~ e ~ L rW ~ _ aT~ ' ~ lal~~.urtm' ~' ~ 1e i ~ `~~~ i d n ucmn u ii uuu.IM1 .. .° ~Lnimn 1 ~x-n~b-~ ``A" ~, c ~ L~ ---_- ~ A y E ~ ~ ~ N y`i ppU ~tlW ~ t~ ;~~3~ ~~~~< ~,'~ iaee ~izF ~j , M 2N Q* 40 22 o~ . ,~ ~W ,h ~h yZ h ~it~lbl'} ~ ~ ~~ ~~ C, S 2~ Z 0 pZ h Q ~~ `~ h j~ ~~ J ~~ es d - 3 ,t a ` eS s ~~ i ~sr .,~~_~" ~ ! `~F BI', la ee Fs'' et; + es ` f ~ as 9-•z f- § ~ P ~~ ~ t t ~ ei ~ ~ S ~ ~a -' ig'~, `0 3 ~` ` ~ s~ ~~ zs i< r F "C ~s i i $ _ } ~ t -- 3 i ~ s m ~ !i N ti W N W y ~, a' Fi € ~3 i j a: ! ; I ~~ y a.~ I= 02Aa i~~ ~~ i (ad~ °1 ;oi E~eF;,~~Foi,g~B ~e~{~efe9#~~I~i .a.T~i~~l~~~, t °~ i F~~;~d°! $iisiis~[~~~, d60$EiFi~FldFsel~t~~ls t to tteet!{aa~ i ~n~~~~ w H W y W h ~Kh i °~a~R ii ua ~ ~ $~ qqG e~q$ ~~i ~~~~ gg 3 ~ t ~i i i e 49E 9 ~l~ !'lij, g =1 -~ I>tvvnLed PrY eve wl Gaup LLG ~1 ss~pp~..1~ ~Ifwlal llf RTOY NO 3001009 ELEVATION 'A' SPANISH ( l.~c~ra-1 wi~l_ ems. -, 1t,4 Wt ~lll I~ ~, ~~' -.....~v PLAN 1 CONCEPTUAL FRONT ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga , C a l l f o r n l a Key Notes. C Le. P~anl. caaeaa snla aaar ~J Fulcwa<N nla pear O Libhlivne®FUW SM F6NN nmaaa.U Famnw Dm.tlrenM Vew © M.W 9Catlw.l CweOe Oam (Olmi Op0avM) P~vIW Ow 9UCe n.rc WmJ PUCK O9 l'[ery $Oam NUeU 10 Optlm.l5moe Vm.v 11 opmleRxV~ 12 wwe sewn 13 x~eea.a sMm9 14 ab wane auaaen. 1© b'-0.1.11 MvPry W.p WoW POUMIr Wod PU1mP IB opmiw weeen~ 19 wam..lema®oPO® 20 e.e wam rmsrma J sma~a Faa.e GlUro ~~ KTGY GROUP .. ~f, rt".-,a,.,-r".r`"-~ All M.y IS 3001 ~ / ELEVATION 'B' ~-! TRADITIONAL s J5. °~~ t I ~I l ~ I • I~. I I I Mba ~ i %r-II III I Mas~er~drm ~ I '. I~.d rt I I I i ~I ~I ~af IYv ~ ~tetrea l °•NG - r i I ~drm / li 111 i ~.. +4 \~ L _I ;; ~ Bate ~I _ - _ _ _ ~ n. Kl~hen ~ 11 I I I e- i ~Bdrm I Noo I ~"'~~' ~ .~ I °ra 1 I _ LI II - -- -- - - Flex h. ~I s.~ tJ I I ~ 4eun \i' I 1 D`nmgl ~ - 17fS V `• r - II ~~ G mg I I 9 I _- • ~ I Garage U L-I_II_ JI . . . I / l I ) ~ i J I I Mba a ~, II i ~ Mas~e LL drtn ` , I i ~ ~ 11 I®SJI~ ., , ' _ II II L I 4 ~ ~ Retreat s'~e. B~ Ih 2 ~ - "- ion ~: , O p t Retrea5 l ~I I~ '~I ~ I Opl Den - 107 s f ~UwvfcA P.nfLLC CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 1 - I, 6 5 9 S F I, 7 6 6 S F =' ~r°~ ^~= A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a xTOY NO 1001009 ;u I I ~^ Y. I I Garage s .8~ 4I l- Ir' - Yal Opt Bedroom 4 - 107 s f KTGY GROUP, ~.~ A 1.2 M.y IS 3001 i a ROOF PLAN ~~ S ve T cE1xIUNF~ ~LON ~.ur~ - MUU,IaNs -To Ee- f~wl~ a ~. V~Y WINWWs ,4r1p AIL WINGCVlS ~E 1' ~ V I»~ !°YLt1 (slbpw ~ LEFT ELEVATION I^ f~ h i I 1 , -----1~----~1~ ---~--~----~-- 4 , ~~,~ T I ' Q : ~ ~ 'I >hw~s.e e~l~ Oacl t Goup C LC ital o~~un~ury '-°"~ar~l,. KTGY NO 3001009 REAR ELEVATION PLAN 1 - A - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga , C a l i f o r n i a RIGHT ELEVATION KTGY GROUP, ,.. ~' ~il.._ -.. __.__ AI3 Mry IS 1001 • • _~ G~yaNS~e ear Devcb~mmtpG~.mq L LC 1 ~Y~ c~°"oY1.r~°1~in KTGY NO I001009 ROOF PLAN REAR ELEVATION PLAN 1 H RanAchoR - x'111 ~o ~ fi~'IrEp cu aFLL KEY Ws ~~ hL,t, Wiu[~s ~WST JfFg YIS9~ELE. 1'0711 -~ ~'lASUG V1~i,J. ~sF-bWN L7~~s{-~~ i - /~ , 1 ~ 6 ~J I, 1 I i~ ~' LEFT ELEVATION ~dS~ ~~~D ~ MI~.~ RIGHT ELEVATION ~ UFtill. 'R~ie. u~-~~"~l~ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS KTGY GROUP: ~... B O R C R E S T ~j ~~~~;;'•' Cucamonga, California ~^••• A1.4 May 15. 1001 -~ - - --- i~ 'I ~' i N ti~ ROOF PLAN -1 up~~r7~y~D -~R"(S _ ,r,}.Et~.~E~ uLl~ ERhg M~l.l,lY-F7J ~ @. ~37.F ~ZtpN . 1 WIUpyS ZD $E ~OIIt~D GN hU. YEY kVINIXa^lS JET1D &LL.. WINDOWS TtbtT xR>= ,tS,.aLe Fran ~t1E ~c. ~l SFMWN TYSF}FD~ --- --I. i3~LL--- - - --- ,;,I,,~ - - s-- -J i ~. ~ i l 4r I a j .o a Glvp91(If~Pof DevebvmmtGmup LLC Imi aGt..ol~rrr ~`rvn.lf'1m nw RTGY NO 3001009 REAR ELEVATION PLAN 1 - C - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION ~;~ KTGY GROUP, ,.. A1.5 May IS 3001 • _~ ~J y~ , ~ ~____c i o~ a , ROOF PTAN - I'wwti -w t~ f1~IPr7~ of xu, FNp kU. WINLZ7WS T l4S rw- V 1~..... _ REAR ELEVATION DnmifiM M1nfic PLAN 1D - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Oswl~mmlOmup LLC ,r1 ~^~ :; A R B O R C R E S T Ranc ho Cucamonga , C a l t f o r n t a KTGY NO 3001009 LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION KTGY GROUP.:: ~~~~.~~ A1.6 May IS 3001 _p s ~r 0~ LLC ~'~s~~. KTGY NO 3001-009 s ELEVATION 'A' „_ __.~ ELEVATION 'H' TRADITIONAL ELEVATION 'D' CRAFTSMAN PLAN 2 - CONCEPTUAL FRONT ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamon ga , C a l l f o r n l a a K ey Notes• 3w.3msxcmmasr~Y Rmr fui raasw TM Rmr O usM r.wse.xeFww 4O SmE imhhimwovF®T~m C pampa Tde Vmw Mml SatlmlOuye pow (Ol.vo{OppoW) 7O imMgt Sww pue C Woetl FUC6 3 pap Smwa Rwm 10 ogim.i,gm. vmew 11 opxm.iRxt vm.w t2 wem smma. 13 Nwemesw.s 14 ~.t wmeammm. 0 somF4.aF w.n 1~ woaa roet.it I© wom p,uws IB pFmm~wmupM 19 wmm. apemmw open 20 s.s wme ron RTC X21 Sem Fwuh Gl®o KTGY GROUP A2.1 Mq 10 3001 s 't~19tT ~)4FS ~C+~ 1~ ~ M f2/E.. ~.~1-l. fw`~ ~1~4ZS f~`aIGED ~S ST~D1~D, opt Bedonm a II "+r II Mbe P ~I l I ~ ~ R, t (~ 111111------------04 4 4 4 4 4 Opt Retreat ~U.cveM Ib& Nai lao.~`o..°I~ ti ..~.~, xTOY NO 3001-0a9 I I f.. I I pp~~ ~aP I ~ ~ I T l1IIl! ~ ~ ~ I I ~+ \ m ~ \ I M -Bdrm -- I ~ '° I ~~ '~ ~ ~~~ _+ o rr mm ~L~LJ~ I I I I ly I I~F ~ I {{-~~~~+ 7~5~' ` I I • 't ~ I I 1~ - Iufl s BMa~ ~R tt ,_ r _ ^' ~ _ _ _ _ ___ ~~ ~ I ~•~ ~ ~ Q :Pdr B th 2 a Flex ~ X ~ ~ ~ ~.b~ ~~ I I ` I , n - to ___ ~r.u _ ~ I L--- I I Bdrm I w l ~ drm 3 ~ ~.c Garage ~~ J rry Second Floor Plan _ Area 1149sf I Fuat Floor Plan i r __ __ ____- ~ Mea 913sf ~'~---gym _ II " ~' 'O II W-~ II r II •• _____x Porch at elevehon'D' CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2 2,062 S F - 2,210 S F A R B O R C R E S T t~~ KTr.~~.yyV GRO~U_P: ~_~ , Ranch o Cuca monga, California , :., ,,,, ~~~' A22 May IS l9al Opt Bedroom 5 - 148 s f I Gvm~ ~~ iti.i a - N1UI.UO~1S ~D 1~ PP~wtL~ W 1ht Y IwNDOWS /~lD kLL 1dINCY~tyc~ ~7 ~ V«i:~-~ Fp711 "flSe (-~12LIG Vteyj, ~ioWll Dl~SN~'D~, P C' 5' ~LLC FLAN 2-A - EXTERIOR .~.~°;~~` A R B O R C Rancho Cucamonga , RTOY NO 1001009 ELEVATION S R E S T C a l I f o r n I a KTG V GROUP, ,.: A23 May IS 3001 i REAR ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION SCwLE 1/~• ~ I U` ~~ ll__iw ~ ,~i I( ^~ LEFT ELEVATION '^~J ly^ _1 X 1!.ul - MUua~S To ~H~tILFD~ KEY ~dINCOyJS .WD hU, WS T ~ ~ts~.Py.e FRJYI ~tF1E /~61.IG ~/1q.f, l '~Wf-1 Q~aN£D~• ~~~~~ 3 ~ ~u-u~ REAR ELEVATION T-MpV~~kyyl~~I ~^IIT{~ NY` 1n~ 1'1>< F~ U.snIfiW P9cific PLAN 2-B EXTERIOR ELEVATION S '.ol`°~'G"~'-k: A R B O R C R E S T 9.e.1~.1°w~„y Rancho Cucamonga , Cal I f o r n I a 1[TGY NO 1001009 '~' _RI~T ~L$VA~TION r uu& r~-I~~L~ E~ L~ KTGY GROUP ,.~ - ~,.-rr~-~~.t~ 4 _::. A24 Mry I1, 3001 ROOF PLAN IT . I C . DlveufiM P~n6c Devebomml Gmup LLC ~.s.~°I°3Pr"rnn 1[TOY NO 1001009 MUI.Up.15 To g~ Flzp,.l~ dy ALL Kf.Y I..IINDOWS )END r.,l.l I.j1N LbW5 TIY.T XJze vls+.el.•E ~M TFte gl-IL. VIEW ~ SFbWU Dl.Sf1ED~ t~ ~____ ~-_//4-' S~- ~ r ~ ~_ scl~ -- --'-/ Q :::{~ `-- "-- ~ _ _Sz_ _ -~ ~ - ROOF PLA pd>;{~ uv~p T~r~ts, '('fF~SIJ.ND ~ WIINR~LS +.caNY t~IL1r~ J ~ ~#a.INE $ I 1 2x 12 RFIJ _yp.an 1 t =_ - ~~~Ilf ji~ I r ---- - irr-ti--- rr'F'~ II ~ ~ ~I~~ REAR ELEVATION ~u£tW.L ExT~Nb >+9 M~ d" ~! -o Q] ~ 51~, ~ 'If1E D~ l41}ftL 'ZNE ~ u~. PLAN 2 C EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga , C a 1 5 f o r n 1 a LEFT ELEVATION ELEVATION r~;1 `;~ KTGY GROUP, ,.. ~_i A2.5 May IS 1001 f s ~ t~ ~ - ~~S~S T XP~~nsx~ ~ 7Vie e~-i~ Vl~kl, 4bHPl p~51it,D~. ---rr---~-'------ 2x LEFT ELEVATION D ~! i~ " 1 ~ I ~ ~ (_ _ _ i ==-zr ~r`-~ ~ ' iL1J r 1 I ~ - - - - ~-- - - '~_~, ~ - --- - --- --- i ~~ -i col ~ ~I, - 1 i ~,v REAR ELEVATION ~~L AND +4 Ml ~ T ELEVATION 5'-9~ Od'IHE s1~e c>< ~. ~t o~I r G~ Uurl. TliE SINE Dnm~fied Paofic ~~~ vLL~ PLAN 2 D - EXTER IOR ELEVATIONS KTGY GROUP ~.~ ~+ ~ IMI1f1110»9fni,~1M A R B O R , ' , ' ~~~.t'~.~r._/. _.t C R E S T ' Rancho Cucamon ga , C a l i f o r n i a A26 ItTOY NO 3001-009 May IS 3001 AOOF PLAN a o~ DlvmufiO4 P,nSc Dnel tGFOUp LLC imp ~0°"~mm KTOY NO 3001009 ELEVATION 'A' PLAN 3 CONCEPTUAL F A R B O R C Rancho C u c a m o n g ELEVATION 'D' CRAFTSMAN R O N T ELEVATION S R E S T a, C a l F f o r n i a KTGV GROUP, ,.. A31 MkY If 3001 • ~....~ ~ ~ ' S SA" ~X6 ~o % ~kLL L~ -x f CorJ ~ ~ 11~5'Cxa.L.EP µ l1i E't'~ ~,.Itd ~~ FEC~, K ey Notes 2 v LOwPmfik COecme 9'iOe ROOF C Fln COebele lileRmF 8 LPht4m5ace F~,p 1 O SmtlFinab $Nmp eYa Few Tim O ~.tlm Tik Vmb MeW Sctloekl O,nkOOear O (OkaOP OPOOmp Fined Ow Snrm Bu ® ® ~ Wm4 FUdO YUmp Saco Rcev 10 a0om.l sa«vmm. 11 opgO.l BAOk Vmm ELEVATION 'H' 12 weee soma. TRADITIONAL `3 FIVdWWeMmP 14 ..~ woos wumkm. I$ s-0"nllNrvsy wJl C ~ WwE PablidF 13 17 WmE R.WOP 1$ Optlo~vm WaW C¢k B 14 4 19 20 wmmw.te.mmmopim re wwtlPMkTw •.rtrVL_~^ 21 Sncm Fkuk COlanv Opt Bedmom 4 P (~ Opt gas fireplace at Mesta ~s ~T ~ G~ MLWI~f~I ~V~, '-il-1E }e€M p~S Euxox~. DlvenlCu4Pmfic CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 3 - 2,254 S F - 2,403 S F Dcreloem~ uLtrd 1~=°•~°'~-^,~ A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga , C a l i f o r n i a KNY NO 3001009 Opt Bedroom 5 - 148 s f ~~~ ~~ 'O I _ I • --S__ Porch al dev D' ~; KrTGV G~~R~OUP,T A32 M,y IS 3001 ~~ -' ; - I4UU.a1S ~ro t~ ~wicev at JkI,L '~ TttJ,T JFE~sM~-e hLL WINCa~+k> r 1 ~~ ~ :. ~~ ~ a I ~ ~~ ~~ is -- + ~ q I T,' ~ 18 ; i V ' m -- ----- , L _J I ____ ____ . _~ _. II ROOF PLAN (~i f,~ r MS LEFT ELEVATION C~hThE ~"r 1~N1-Ya 1 kip EVaLCGNIES hL.crlC-( Fa~`~l.lNE -bf MN.U eg1~Tk1E ~~ ~Fh~ EI-ak41~GN. I / I !l p I tj\ 1 ~°S ^ v l' ~ y ~ ~ is ev`;,,, N s ~a i _ ~ aim r ~G' ,1 19 ~ ~I..ei g __ _ _ _ T 1 L T7~ ____ _ _ ______ ___ __ ID •I~ ~Y~I I - I~ III Ilr ~ __ I'~__ C] CJ ~VJIr1Crid.S -v tE" sµ4r • 1 REAR ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION Dmmufice P¢dic PLAN 3 - A EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ~ KTGY GROUP, ~.~ Oe el mmt Gmup LLC ieu,o~c-uhun.. c.a. ru.rmw ~r„„ A R B O R C R E S T =~~ °^TT^° Rancho Cucamonga , Cal I f o r n l a A3.3 1[TOY NO 3001009 M~> IS ]001 s • s - f'~LII.uLNS "10 ~ ~Pll ~d,t Y-EY bdwDOWsI Awl M~ FliN~Ws ~teAT1 M-2,~lShBxE ~~ ~ ~ T LEFT ELEVATION ~+ y~~ .r ~ FI REAR ELEVATION ~-~ ~~' `'-'tV`~ ~TLJ> .4 }.7y,~ q ~l.e ~ t~ ~~ ~, ., SIGHT ELEVATION exaa c~ uun~ Zl•1e PAY UNE {'ZrN(-C ni.ml6d e.nr~ Usyel a¢mem Gmlq L LC PLAN 3 - B EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS KTGY GR a '=' ~r°:•°`°I~` A R B OUP, ~.. ~ r.m~.rrrxr~r-ro O R C R E S T ~~ ;~ :• ;•. •; , Ranc ho Cu ~ ,, . ~_ camonga C a l i f o r n i a A34 ICTGT NO 3001009 May IS 1001 ROOF PLAN lo- , ra- - ~tu~uavs -IO eE ftm,ncea al xu. ~ t^untcoWS A>,IV ~u. >rUuczX.is -r[-tAr 1~ visl~e,-E. fFar1 -n+e P~,IG VlEµl, ~toWN. q~sf{~~, LEFT ELEVATION ~, II G' ~ I <ti e 18 p'~ ~ ~5 I -~I - - - - 1` ' --- - -~~~p - ~--- C -- --- - REAR ELEVATION ~~~~SI.I. QI'~1JD 9~ Mt11 GHT ELEVATION TJ-o ~"[HE ~~ pF TNe C.R urm~ "tHe ~~ uuE ~1'J~ Drvm~fiM WClfic PLAN 3 C - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DerrloommlGmq LLC _ KTGY GROUP, ,.. Nm trmq~u~r -~:~+'.'*-'~*Ti*.y-risi~n ~'°~.an~. ~ A R B O R C R E S T ~~ _ Rancho Cucamonga, California _ ~~ A35 [TGY NO 3001009 May IS I001 ROOF PLAN I.r . rr - Mu~ua.ls w r~ B~EEY WIAIf~Y~IS Nlp INR~-IS -T1t3.T XPE vlshBl.t PFcrt 'R1F. (mow p,~~ r~ ~~ ~_ ~uu r~ ~;w ~~~~ LEFT ELEVATION ~TIO~Vd- _ _ _ Wi~~ REAR ELEVATION ~ ~~-L EXT~1lD k Gf 5'-or Ofl ~(~, SILS Cf ~~ Pvmi6M RCi! PLAN 3-D - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S ~.~.a~...,,. °'~~ c~'°~""~ A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga , C a l I f o r n 3 a IITOY NO 3001009 KTGV GROUP; ,. A36 May IS 3001 ROOF PLAN I `(/IL / GF I4l,l_ ~ L-~avZtGJ,S ~~ Lx~.-ctor.{ I+~lw 6E I N JCxwr'D W fk'Y-E SHa~~ al P-Cp~ K ey Notes ra..9Afue cw<~w<snN Rwr Fu~cemm. ne Rwr O3 LRttOre Smeeimir6 O SeO PmW SNCmem Fom iM Dee.x..m.vma ~ Daa e (GhmSOpml) ~ 7Q FmeOgn Slow Bm l6) wmE PUCK _'P+ l ~~DSSILYJE D~rw~1~ Pyc~f DeveloF 10mvp LLC I~ O~en~~iy iir RTOY NO ]001009 ELEVATION 'A' SPANISH ELEVATION 'C' FRENCH P I. A N 4 - CON ~~ •V~l ELEVATION 'B' TRADITIONAL ELEVATION 'D' CRAFTSMAN C E P T U A L FRONT ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Ranc ho Cuca mon ga , C a l i f o r n i a U 'Dep 9Um Rem 10 D9mmism„v,,,> 11 oRUowla~vwm r12 w„esnwc. 13 n.mm9slemR 19 ~.9 wee oulwRm 1© sn~un rn.cywal ib w„e9nx~v 17 wweRwuR u D9oaea wwe Dex 19 w-~mo.n RMnm ppu® 20 n9 ww9Rminw 2I sn®Rhaw c,x~ ISTGY GROUP,, A4.1 May I5. 1001 ~ i i 5 Opt. Bedroom 5 - 178 s f 6 M~~• ni _..~ n Bdm,3 l ~ N Opt Bedroom 6 a----- I ~ I I I ~~ 1 ------, Dmmg Q .___-_ ~~i..>~ a I i 1 I~'I 1 IPJ~- ~ I mr 1 I --1~ I ^ 11 it t ~~JJ I ___ L - - 1 I I -'p7 V 1 ~ tf---a--= . ~~_-_-_ Secood Floor Plm __-_-~ J - .. .... Flrst Floor Plaa Area 1412 s f Area 1153 s f o~o~ N I nt Fw lY I I I 1 __ __ µ ____ Porch et elevahon'B' FIeK t I II I I ~_ _--_ Tblf~ at elevation UI Garage s ~ i____ o,..,y,e.a wosr '°' CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 4 - 2,565 S F - 2,743 S F ~,,, A R B O R C R E S T Ranch o Cuca monga C a l t f o r n l a KTGT NO x001009 Porch et elevettoo ~ O KTGY GROUP: ;;: iii ; "" A4 2 May IS 1001 Cry - Mu1.~wr.IS 70111: ~i~ ~ rn.L ~" WINLYJWs YWP fSU, WINLbWS Z{t4T ~ vise,~t~ F1mr~ -p{E &-ic MtZd. SFbl+4d pt311eD~ n -- I u '-----u------~-- -------- ---- II Cj ~] I i -AI. ~~,~.S.ygti>v.sy ~OWCL X12 Who s ?A~TC LEFT ELEVATION u - u - - u _ 4 _ I rT"7 ~ I I I _I 1 II ~ -. II f~ Sa I?j 54 ~ I~~ C-=~ III REAR ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION DnvaSd P~nfic ~wt~ LL` PLAN 4 A - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS KTGY G ..,. u....1,. `r~an~. A R B O R C R E S T , ROUP, ~.. ~~~ -"~'B'"r'°9~' ~ • ~ .. Rancho Cu camonga, California _ ~~~ A43 KTGY NO 3001-009 MYY IS 5001 • • • ROOF PLAN s tu~u~s -m ~ w +~LL {~IINI~•IS ~Mlp INGb{+1S ~, TAT ~ Ylsrlpt,E 7ry£ I Ir 1 ~-FbWN l~W ED ~ Ih I ! I --- I ~~ ---~~--F~-------- y a.~s.a e.~,r m cl~mml Gmq LLC [TOT NO 1001009 ap~L wINIO~Is '2X12 BE~~a9.ID LEFT ATION II II - _ ' '~~, r-, ~ U A- _______ I __J~IL _____-__ II 1 II I ~ ~I(~-nl I(T~ill I ~ f I ~~ ~ ~~lil LLUJ~ LLlIJ~ REAR ELEVATION i s-^ ~ ~'~'~' ~~µD ~' ~K ~IGHT ELEVATION I a~ C11 1F~E SIDE Lp TAE cR urM~ Zt~. i~~rY u~ . PLAN 4 - B - EXTERIOR ELEVATION 5 II u ~ KTGY GROUPi.;: A R B O R C R E S T ~ j ;~µ:;,,,:• Rancho Cucamonga , C a l I f o r n 1 a A44 May IS 3001 ROOF PLAN --~ Muu.iol1S ~ e£ ({z~~p a,t ALL µIbACYJWs /dAD ALI. ~.1MCCHtS ~ hfe YISAaLe PR]'l "1Fte ~cJ c~l~µ ~ n--- ii u------1-------------- ii ~ ~~ ii t~.rr+~- _~n l_ ROOF PLAN iz ~grJU> -- u----- ii r~~Ht~~~`I'1' y"Ci'ID ~ MI'A76HT ELEVATION 5 -a GN TFte 51GE- Ck Z}~ ~, UlJllt, ~1{i>r ( V IIdE.~81.y3~ a A45 ILTOY NO 1001-009 MAY O 3001 LEFT ELEVATION s ~ ~ m.en5~a r.~lra PLAN 4 C EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS '~ ~°~' ~"` A R B O R C ~,a~ KTGY GROUP, , Rancho Cucamonga Cal I f o r n 1 ~~ ~" U,10NS "To Qom, f'Rai ,'d-1, WIN[bhls hN0 M_t~S 1FUCT hRS Y1SABl.E ~IEUG Meld GSA ~~) n___ I I _____U_______.______ _______ I I ~~ ~ ~ t rrr c1i aar.-.-..... a I ~~ A46 KTGY NO 3001009 May IS 39YI Drvrnfied P~nfic PLAN 4 D - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS KTGY GROUP. ,.~ °~ar°~~" A R B O R C R E S T ~~~.~,,,.. _ Rancho Cucamonga, Cal Ifornia ~~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.45 p.m. Emily Wimer July 17, 2001 . tNVIRONMEN I AL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16239- DIVERSIFIED -A requestto subdivide 20.15 acres of land into 109 lots for the purpose of single family home construction in the Low Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victona Specific Plan, located at the northeast comer of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN. 227-691-01. Design Parameters• The site is sun-ounded by residential development to the north and east. To the west is vacant land for a future park and to the south is a developed commercial center. In order to accomplish all aspects of the proposed project the Victoria Community Plan will be amended from Medium and Medium-High Residential to a Low Medium Residential District. This will allow the proposed single-family units at a density of 2 8 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing to develop 109 single-family lots with four architectural styles, including Spanish, Traditional, French, and Craftsman. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the existing development immediately adtacent to the site. All residential development surrounding the proposed project is zoned Lowand Low Medium Residential. The north boundary is the Pacrfic Electnc Railroad nght-0f-way, which transitions to Low Residential. Low Medium Residential, currently developed with single-family homes, is located to the east of the proposed project To the south is a developed neighborhood commercial center, and to the east is vacant for a future park. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee . discussion Major Issues: The following broad design issues vinll be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect: Substantial vanation of front yard setbacks is required. Both Street "E" (on the north side) and Street "D" on both the north and south sides have almost every home plotted with a front yard setback of 20 feet. 2 Provide illustrations, which show upgraded features for comer lots such as wrapped stone, bellybands, and window mullions on all elevations facing public view. 3 Provde upgraded features also for rear elevations along Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Provide a bellyband tnm on two plans on all four sides for further enhancement. 2. Window mullions on "key windows" shall include all the second story windows forfrontand side elevations. Stone and brick veneer "option" shall be considered "standard" on all plans. Policy Issues: The following items an: a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be • incorporated into the protect design without discussion: 1. Fieldstone veneer shall be natural nver rock as opposed to a manufactured product. Other types of stone veneers may be manufactured. ~~~rr ~tG 32 ~x~~ b~~ DRC COMMENTS TT 16239 -DIVERSIFIED July 17, 2001 Page 2 2. All wall visible from or facing a street shall be decorative masonry on both sides. 3. Maximum height of a retaining wall shall not exceed 6 feet high unless a vanance is approved. Section 7 of the Conceptual Grading Plan shows a possible 7.5-foot retaining wall. 4 Slope banks 5 feet or greater in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and as follows. one 15-gallon or largersize tree per each 150 square feet of slope area and 1-gallon shrub for 100 square feet, and appropnate ground cover. 5. Rear yard fencing visible from public streets (at top of slope) shall be decorative masonry on both sides. All porches shall be a minimum of 6 feet in depth 7. Provide a two-tone contrast on stucco trim on all elevations. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval vnth the above comments. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: tarry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Emily Wimer The Committee recommended approval of the project, subiect to the revisions below The project will be brought back to Design Review Committee as a consent calendar item. 1 Decorative trim treatment shall be considered "standard" on 80 percent of all elevations. 2. Two of the four plans are required to have a balcony on the rear elevations facing Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. 3. Submit new layout for the setback variations on D and E Streets 4. Wrap brick and stone a minimum of 5 feet on the side of the buildings or until the fencng of the property terminates. 5. Retum walls (facing public view) are required to be decorative masonry Illustrate a typical elevation. 6. Two of the four elevations shall incorporate a bellyband on all four sides. a,c33 CONSENT CALENDAR 7 30 p m. Emily Wimer July 31, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND TENTATIVE TRACT 16239- DIVERSIFIED-A request to subdivide 20.15 acres of land mto 109 lots for the purpose of single-family homeconstructonmthe Low Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victona Community Plan, located at the northeast comer of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-691-01 Revisions will be available at the meeting Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Lany McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Emily Wimer The applicant has rewsed the plans that addressed all six comments from the July 17th Design Review Committee meeting The Committee recommended approval of the project, subtect to one new revision. Decorative return walls shall be block with a stucco overcoat and painted a complementary color to comGde with the stucco color of the homes. The color will be presented for approval at the Planning Commission hearing. C_~ lit ~~.. 3~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) ; INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt rs the responsrbrl~fy of the applicant to ensure that the appbcatron rs complete at the trine of submittal, Crty staff will not be available to perform work regmred to prowde mrssmg information Application Number far the pro/ect to which this form pertains ~~ Arborcrest riae• Name 8 Address of pro/ect owner(s)• DPDG Ftmd III ~ LLC 10621 Civic Center Drive, 2nd Floor Rancho Chcamonga, CA 91730 Name 8 Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor. ContactPerson& Phillip Burwn 4ddress: 10621 Civic Center Drive, 2nd Floor __- ~ C /S dl~ "J'9 auoN :Nessaoaup ;says /euogrppe yoege) aps ~aford ay; p7age p/no,H yory,~ aSueyo euoz~o;uaurpuaure uerd ~eraua6 pasodoid.fue aquosap(~ :(suogeorpap pasodord g s;aa-0s oggnd/o ease snuruf aLS airs /e?oJJ easy aqs;aN (9_ -/+ sazo2 ST' OZ •(7! bs/oeJ easy a;rs ssor~ (g, • ro-re9-czz ~(dreasaoau sr;aays ~euogrppe yoepeJ sregrun~/ /eyed s-~ossassy (y anuant~ uaxrii'!•W P~ paog autraseg ;o ~auzoo ~s2ati}zou at[~ ~e sa~2 ST'OZ (aquosapJ uogeoo7;oalord (E •yde~6o;oyd yoea~o uogeoo/6uu~oys deal a apnpu/ a;rs ay; ruoi; sam~ea/ ~ueoyru6rs;o smarn enge;uasa~dar pue 'aus ay; aiuas yorym s;urod ssaaoe ~pewud ay; u~aq a;rs ay; woi; pue o/ur smarn .gsant pue;sea 'y;nos 'you ay; Luny a/rs ay; our smarn ange;uasadar mot's yorym sydel6o;oyd~o/oo ~o;as a aprnoid (Z •sauepunoq aps et'; a;eorpur pue `a;rs;oe%id ay; sapn~our yorym (sJ;aayg jua/penp S~S~ ayj;o .idoo (; ~ x U;-g) a~eos pry a aprno~d (~, N yeas ~fq pa;sanba~ asrrway;o ssa/un sadn0 uogaru/suoo-uou/o pannbai;ou sr (,J psua;se ~fq pa;eorpur uogeuuo;u~ r~ U OSTi-iB~ (606) ~agrunp/ ___ auoyda~al anog2 sa atu2g .(anoge uro~;;ua~ayrp/rJ uuo/ sry; 6uueda~d uoslad;o ssaippy g aweN • • -~~ ~ `4 auoN (No;sry /ero pue syodar paysggnd 's~/oogJ uogewro;ur;o saarnos //e a;rs •aps ay;,;o s;Dadra /eouo;sryuo~pue /enq/no umoury ay; aquosap(p/. •spaan y~zr, pazanoo diiezauab st a}zs szyy •a~ts ayq uo s~stxa ~ up 3F ~eunei3 zo pzoi; ani~pu ai~gri tLian pue ~spd ayq ui pappzb uaaq say axis ayy •iros • ~ooz y~}tr~ aigpgs diiporuyoa~oab si alts ayy •$Z diagpmtxoz p 3o a~pz p ~p uor~oazip dizay~nos p ui sadois pup ~upopn di~uazzno sz axis ayy " (sarpn;s oy;eq 's~fanrns leor6o/oayye pue ogorq 'sarprys or6o/ap~fy uo~pue /eor6o/oa6 ' a r) uogeuuolm;o sawnos //e a;rs 'uogrppe u! paquosap sa~n;eay;ueoyiu6rs;o sydei6o;oyd yoeuy Barn;.ongs ay;;o asn ay; pue (uor;rpuoo pue a6e 6urpnpurJ a;rs uo sarntongs 6ugsrxa ~fue aquosap s;oadse oruaos pue 'sasunoo a6eurerp 'spew pue s/req `saaq a~n;ew 's/ewrue pue s;ue/d ajrpge;s lros ',fydar6odo; uo uogetmo;ur 6urpn/our;oalord ay; a~oyaq s;srxa;r se a;rs ay;~o 6urpas lenrsfyd ay; aquosa0(6 s~ruuad sxzor, otTgnd pup ~uaruyopozoua Ipo-rdby • ;aa(ard ay;;uawa/dwr.Q/n; o;~ap~o ur saroua6e /e;uawurano6~ay;o pue e6uowean~ oyouea;o .Qr~ ay; wog ,fiessaoau aq //rM yoryn~ s;ruuad ye {o uogduosap a apn/su/(g • • 4~ "~'4Z oN ~oa(ard sy;~o eare /eraua66urpunauns ay;~a ~apereya ~o a/eas `waged arq abueyo pafold pasodo~d ey; //~ (, •xs2d TeuotbaZ a.m~n; s,F~?~ auk ;o axis auk sr anuaag uas~T'[rW ;o ~saM •~ua~ojanap Tetosa®oo ut~stxa ue si peog au•r-raseg ;o t~nog •uoFssnipgns rer~vaptsaz bur~stxa ue st asau} sea aye os •uoisinrpgns •~er.}uaptsas bur~srxa ua sT BM 30 ~N T~ act ;o c~sou pue tleM ;o ~qbT~ pEOSLres pauopuEge ue sr t~.zou a~erpa~ auk oy :(•o;a p~e~fuear ~eq;es `a6e;uay ~ybrayJ;uawdo/anap~o a/eos pue (•o;a `safo;s;uaugiedap sdoys 'sasnoy;uawyede ;(~rwe~-auoJ asn pue/;o .(psua;w '(•o;a ~eryawwoo yequaprsarJ asn pue/;o edy ay; a~eorpu/ s~adse o/usos to ~{ra;s/y `/enq/no .fue pue s/aw/ue pue s~ue/d uo uoger~a{ui 6urpn/our 'saq~adard 6urpuna~ns ay; agrr~sa0(E ' 4~uour 6Z-8T ut[{~2n P .P aP P~ ZOOZ 3o nzQa3 q M sawoy-gT-OT ;o ui~stsuoo sassy ~ ue oigenaTa ano; ygrr, suer .zoo; ano; aye uoTe eo pueT paouec{ua uoi~e~uaumuow qua • - o S bOT 3o s~sisuoo a~ig ayy :.iressaoau{r (sJ;aays/euor~ppe yoegy quawaraui yoea;o uoga/dwoa pa;ediogue ay; pue 'aseyd yaea y;rM mooo o;~awdo/anap;o;ua;xa ay; ~uawdo/anap~o~ saseyd pasodvd aie aray;fir a;eorpu/ ~a/aid pasodnrd ay; word;/nsai//rM yoryre asn a;ewq/n/o suua; ur aps ay;/o uogduosap a;en6ape ue aprna~d p/noys sryl /re/ap ur;oalad pasodo~d ay; aquosap(Zl •a.zn~a~rt.~~ pue SjjPM ~a~amtzad q~tM pa~Pbt~rm aq o~ aney jjtM asto^ ~.aa.z~s dug •anuang aaxrjjtW pue paog aurjaseg o~ ~uaoaCpe st alts auy •sasn pasodad 1°a;1e prn~.fay; Moy pue (o;a `asrou,feMpeoi ~er~reJ a;rs ay/ aaa~e rnou;ey/ s/ana/gray; pue saamos asrou ~fue aquosap(~/ • ~ ~'9 ens ;o! tunurrxeur pue az;s;o! urnmiurur'sans!aared}o abuer a;eo!puQ payoe!ap s!run !equaprsar }o requrnN (Di ~5103/'02!d 7b'11N3QIS: (ae%fep~ebJ pu~era~aruuro0 'q 0£6 6Z (dePAebJ!eyuaprsaa 'e 'L6SZ -LBb 7e 7orgs!O ra!eM d;uno~ ebuomeon0 ay;;ae;uoa asaa!d 'uogeoyue!o ~aypn}.roj (sa;eurgsa abesn uaf y;uauryoeAy aaS) :uogereuab abemas djrep paFOadxa a;eorpw pasodofd sr u~a;sfs abemas.irepues a o; afveyosrp}! •s;sa; uoge/oyad yoepe pasodnrd are s>,ue; ogdas}! uamaS R >{uel ogdaS yesodsrp abemas}o pot';aru pasoda~d ajeorpur(5L (oe/unugebJ asn dead (oe/~fepnebJ •pu~eroramuro0 •q 008 0£i (deO/IebJasn>{ead 006 59 (depgeb)!equeprsea 'e L6SZYB6ie;ou;s!pra;eM.UunoO ebuoureon0 ay; ~e;uoa eseeld'uogeoyue~ray;rn}roj •(sa;eurgsa abesnro} y;uauryoepyaaSJ abesn re;em}o!unoure pa;oadxa a;eorpu!(gL smerp a;rs ay; yorym o;ui (sagddns ra;em ogsaurop 6urpn!ourJ reaem}o sarpoq due aleorpu~ (L L auoN saar; oruaosro am;eur}o s;uauraoe!dar ro/pue s!enourar pasodwd a~eorpu! (g L, •~oedu~-t aztwrutm iiiM a.zn~oa~rgo~e pue ~buideospueT ~sTieM ~o asn agy •~stxa irtM uotstntpgns iat~uaptsa~ e u~tr, pa~eroosse astou ieot ~ ruot~onz~suoo za~~y •paziTz~n aq jicM saaT~~nm p e szno~{ pagrurrZ •~uawdtnba q~iM pa~eaauab ac{ rTrM asrou ~uoi~on.z}suoo bur.zna • ~pasodmd are 6uyooud punos{o spot';au:!eyM sasn a;rs-uo pue saryadad;uaoelpe aoa}}e s!ana! asrou asay; prm mot' ;unome pue aarnos 6urpn!our pa!erauab aq o; asrou uua!-6uo! pue uua!-!rot's{o addx ay; aaeorpu~(gL • • Oh ~`9 r~ LJ :add dq sasn /euogrggsuruo jeulsnput yera~aurwoa;o ease uoog /e7o1(5 :sasn leuogrygsuruo /er-0snpur ~erararuuroo;o (sJuogoun; ~oleur pue (s)asn;o adfj aquosa0 (g~ 51~3!'02Id 7D'N011/71/15N/ OND'7V2/15nCTNl 7d10~f3WWC ZZ y6ry~oruag •o TZ :y6ry~olunp •q OS :Ne;uauia/~ •e g ~uauryoe{7 y ui umoys se s~otgsrp /ooyog a;eudordde ay; loe~uo~ .~alafd aya ury;rna 6urprsal aq /dim oy,~ uaip/ryo /ooyos;o ~agmnu pa/oadxa ay; eJeorpul (6Z 59S'Z -b mid -£ mid -Z upTd 659' T -i ueid •edu Arun dq azrs p/oyasnoy pa7edioque a/eorpu/ (EZ g uor~ o ~siuooapaq b -b upTd • - d ~ uot~ o 'swoa~paq E _i usTd ad~~run.fgsuroorpaq;o~agrunu~tjroadS(ZZ o/ g (y/uour~ad)/uab Q of $ (s)aoud ales paurutza}aP ~Tiaur3 dad ~oN s/uar~o~pue saoud a/es;o a6ue~ pa/edroquy(/,Z stun eTPS god (s/run a/esJO;~o/e/ua~ aye s/run~ay/ayM a/eufpurJ payoepy • • Ih ~'9 •s~uauranos a~isuo ~o uot~eiiegsuz o~ ~a,gns ~oa,os auk aoznzas oq ~iiige srac{q Pageorpui anecl pue pagoEquoo vaaq aneq saiouabe i'Cd •sa~ esuodsa~ray; a;enrpur esea/d'os;/ ~;oa(oid pasodoid atp o; aarnias aaenbape aprno~d o;.flgige~rey; auruua;ap o; pale;uao uaaq;oa(oid ay; 6urves sar~ua6e /aquoa pony pue 'ary ~a,~as ~a;em ay; aneH(ZE 51~3('OL/d 77 (EBZ9-ZL3 (BLB) Ie yorgsrp;uarua6eueyy r[7r/enp pry;seo~ y/noB ay; y6nory; payuan aq p/noys a;epJ •suorssru~a uognyod ire}o;unorue pue adLl 'aynos ayr a;eorpur :puo sash /eu/snpw pue /eraiawwoa ~o~ E, •~~ ay; w aprsar,tyuauno;ey; parry aq o; sra~pom fo~agwnu ay;~o uoAeuiys3 (DE (,Uessaoau~r;aays /euogrppe yoepe) uogeoyrsse/o yoea~o/ arryso a;e~ ay;qo uogeorpw ue se (/ana se 'sa6ue~tie(es pue ahem 6urpn(our `suogeo}rsse/o go(pa;edroque~o umopryea~q aprno~d(6Z ;(ryg wnwrxept(;o awl }~ryS wnurrxe~r saa~fo/dwa /e/ol yo ~agwnN (8Z • • uogerado~o srnoy a/eorpu/ (LZ Z }, ~' 9 aR1 ain;eu6ig iO-Oi-$ 'tea -e6[~iLeon~ oyoue~/~o.urp ay;.fq apem eq ueo uogen/e~ a;enbape ue a~o~aq paprmgns aq o; pagnbar eq w uoge nom;euoq/ppe;ey; pue;siapun 1ay;rn/ / {agaq pue a6pa/mouH ~(u>> psaq ay;o;;oatroa pue enq are pa;uasafd uogeu~ ui s;uarua;eFs 's;oe~ ay;;ey; ;tUpge.fu~yo;saq ay; o;tea/ord sry;;o uogenren a;enbepe ua1 parrnbai uogeuLO~ur pue e;ep ay;;uasad spgryxe payoe;}e ay; ur pue anoge paysruml s;uerua;e;s ay;;ey;.tjgrao ~fgalay •suoistnrpgns Ter~uapisa.z ury~ir, asn rer~uapisas y~zr, uoz~oauuoo ur pa~~}w.za aaa yo-rur, asoy~ jup sue/d uogeor/dde ay; uo pa/age/ pue un~oys aq pegs 'seare;uarudiys pue a6ero;s ay; y;rm 6uo/e 'sasn yonsyo uogeoo/ ayl ;esodsrp;o poy;aui pasodad pue pasn eq W s/eua;eru yons peyo giro;uanui ue aprnmd `sad y/ anoge pa;sr/ sa/durexa asoy; o; pa;rurq;ou;nq 6uipn;our 's;eua;eui orxo; ~o~pue snoprezey;o afaeyosrp uo a6ero;s 'asn uLa;-6uo/ ro ,Uerodula; ay; an/onur;oalord pasodold ay; //~ (bE 'oN . uMOUry ;r 'asn;o sa;ep ay; se pans se ',(pado~d ay; uo afueyosrpro~pue 'a6e~o;s 'asn nay; aquosap pue s/eua;eru ay;;sp asea~d anoge ay;yo.fue;o a6e~o;s punarfuapun a;ou osry sase6 pue sprnbry a/geuimep~ay;o pue 's;uan/os 'spo 's/an; 'saprorq~ay pue sappgsad 'saoue;sgns angoeorpe~ 's=A~d o] Pa;rmq;ou aye;nq 'apn~ow s/eua;ew arxo;uo~pue snoprezey~o sa;du~ex3 ~s;eua;em orxo; ~o~pue snopuezey;o a6ieynsrp ~o 'a6e~o/s 'asn ~fue uaaq aray; sey '~ado~d sry;;o ~Go;sry umoury ay; ur (EE • BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project Fde: SUBTT16239 2. Related Files• Development Review DRC2001-00262 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16239- DIVERSIFIED - A request to subdivide 20 15 acres of land into 109 lots for the purpose of single family home construction in the Low-Medwm (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN 227-691-01 This site is also the subject of an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC 2001-00263, which is scheduled for second reading to approve by the City Counal on September 5, 2001, to change the zoning designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medwm High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) • 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: DPDG Fund III, LLC 10621 Civic Center Drive, Second Floor Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community Plan 6. Zoning: Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Victoria Community Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is bordered on the west by Milliken Avenue followed by the City's future regional park site, on the south by Base Line Road followed by existing commeraal development, on the north by the future Pacific Electric Trail, followed by existing single-family homes, and on the east by existing residential development The site is vegetated with annual and perennial grasses with thick patches of buckwheat and other native vegetation There are no trees located on site 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: . Emily Wimer Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 a, ~ y3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 Page 2 • 10. Other agencies whose approval is required State Water Resources Control Board - General Construction Activities Storm Water Runoff Permit ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Transportation/Circulation / (/) Land Use and Planning (/) Biological Resources (/) Public Services ()Population and Housing ()Energy and Mineral Resources ( )Utilities and Service Systems (/) Geological Problems / O Aesthetics / Water ( )Hazards ()Cultures Resources (/) Air Quaht (/) Noise (/) Recreation ( ) y (/) Mandato Fmdin s of Sgnficance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed U1,A Nancy erguso Senior Pro)ect Manager August 30, 2001 r1 I-~ Ql~y`I Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Gwdelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified Potentially SgnRicant T Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenbaly Un~ ss han Sign cant Mltlgatron Sign~wnt No Impatl Incorporated Im C Impact LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonmg~ O O (~) ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (~) policies adopted by agenaes with lunsdiction over the prolect~ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (~) wcinity~ d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (~) established community Comments: a-d) The protect site is located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road within the Victoria Community Plan area The northernmost 10 35 acres of the site is currently within the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and the southernmost 9 8 acres of the site is within the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Development of the site at its current designation would result in 83 to 145 dwelling units within the 10 35-acre area and 137 to 235 dwelling units within the 9 8-acre area for a total of 220 to 380 dwelling units The applicant is proposing an amendment to the Victoria Community Plan to designate the entire protect site aLow-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) The applicant has proposed a tract map showing 5 4 units per acre with lot sizes averaging approximately 5,500 square feet within the 20 15-acre site for a total of 109 dwelling units, a minimum of 111 less dwelling units than under existing zoning The proposed designation will blend with existing Low-Medwm residential development immediately north and east of the protect site A change from Medwm and Medium-High Residential Districts to Low-Medwm Residential District wdl decrease the number of people within the area and will blend with existing development 6,C L{5 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Poteneely SignRwnt Impep Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polanpaly unless TPan $gndwnt MMgalion Signdiwnt No Im ad Inmryaratetl Im a Impact 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (~) population prolections~ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (~) directly or indirectly (e g ,through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (~) housing Comments: a-b) The protect consists of the subdivision of 109 single family lots on 20 15 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road within the Medium and Medium-High Residential District of the Victoria Community Plan The protect includes an amendment to the Victoria Community Plan to designate the entire site Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per area) Development of the site under existing zoning +xould have generated a minimum of 696 people Under proposed zoning, the protect will generate 345 people Therefore the proposed protect will decrease density within the area The Cucamonga County Water District confirmed they have the ability to provide adequate sewer and water service for the protect c) The protect site is currently vacant Land immediately east and north of the site includes existing residential development, and land south of the site includes commercial development The area west of the site across Milliken Avenue is the future site of the City's Regional Park No impacts will result, as existing housing will not be displaced Potemuly SgnR~nt t Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fotentbly unl ~ ins, SignAmanl MM1gatnn Signditsnt No Im ct 1 ataC Im cl Im act 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result rn or expose people to potential impacts involving a) Fault ruptures O O O (~) b) Seismic ground shakings O U (~) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () () (~) ( ) d) Seiche hazards O O O (~) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (~) 6, C, y4 r~ U • Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Potentialy SignRwnt Impact Less Issues and Supporting Informatlon Sources Potanaaly unless Than SipnRwnl MM1igatron SgnRirant No Im eci Incapnated Im ap Im act f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable Boll () () () (~) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (~) h) Expansive soils O O O (~) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (~) Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within one mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately three mile north of the site These faults are both capable of producing 6 0 - 7 0 magnitude earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to 7 5 magnitude earthquakes is 9 0 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to 8 2 magnitude earthquakes, is 11 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the City grading standards and the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than sign cant d) The site is not located near a body of water e) The site is relatively flat so grading will be minimal Grading will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the protect because the site is currently vacant Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer The impact is not considered significant f-h) The General Pian indicates the Tu~unga-Soboba soil association for the site which has only slight erosion potential and runoff potential is slow to very slow Soils are suitable for residential development The impact is not considered sigmficant i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features Palanlially Sign cant Issues and Supporting Informatlon Sources Potantlaly unb : Thai SpnRmnt MNgatron SipnRrant No Im Inm teb Im G Impact 4. WATER. Will the proposal result ~n a) Changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, () (~) () ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (~) hazards such as floodmg~ 6,c y`~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Potentially Si9n~taM Impel Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Patantialn unleaa man SipnRwant Mitgatwn SgnAwanl No Im ad IncorporeteC Im ed Impact c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (~) of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (~) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (~) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (~) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (~) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (~) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) The protect is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns as the vacant lot will be developed with single-family dwelling units and related hardscape Since grading onsite will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) The project will also require a General Construction Activity Storm Water Runoff Permit from the SWRCB Both the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or stormwater conveyance channels BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion dunng the rainy season The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. i • 6 ~ G ~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the protect by the Budding Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP will make this impact less than significant b) The site does not occur within a 100-year flood plain c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water The applicant has prepared a preliminary drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed A final report will be required prior to issuance of a grading permit f-i) The protect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge r-1 Potentially $Ign1~K211I Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pptantialn u~ ss ~~ Sgndram M~igation Sign rant No Im q Irco toil Impart Im ed 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (~) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () (~) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (~) cause any change in climate d) Create obtectionabie odors () () () (~) Comments: a) The proposed protect was screened using Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnd, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The criteria pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO^), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Two of these, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursors Default values were used where protect specific information was unavailable Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) r1 U The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6'~ edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model In order to reflect the purely residential nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to decrease the number of medium to heavy duty diesel trucks and increase the number of light passenger vehicles Wood stoves and wood burning fireplaces were deleted as inappropriate home heating sources in this region The protect operational emissions do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of a , c ti~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 significance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contnbution to regional emission of critena pollutants Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NO^ CO PM~o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Grading 1 59 1 59 19 30 18 34 - - 21 36 7 49 Worker Trips 0 64 0 64 0 91 0 91 1 73 1 73 0 17 0 17 Stationary Equip 0 34 0 34 0 27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile Equip 0 83 0 79 12 66 12 03 - - 0 89 0 84 Arch Coatings 31 41 29 84 - - - - - - Asphalt 131 124 - - - - - - Totals 36 12 34 37 33 15 31 55 1 73 1 73 22 44 8 53 SCAQMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Significance No No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Area Source 5 44 5 42 1 37 1 11 0 58 0 47 - - Mobile Source 19 10 19 10 13 92 13 92 168 39 168 39 8 02 8 02 Totals 24 54 24 52 15 29 15 03 168 97 168 86 8 02 8 02 SCAQMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Significance No No No No No No No No Generally, construction of a protect this size wdl not exceed SCAQMD thresholds dunng grading activities for PM,o and NO^, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx Tables 1 and 2 show project impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented Sensitive receptors in the area include residences surrounding the site Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) wdl be generated However, the proposed protect will be completed m one phase and, any impacts to these sensitive receptors from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. • ~1 L...J b,C 50 M Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 3. Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM„B emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,B emissions from the site during such episodes. 5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,B emissions. b) During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NOx and PM,B levels in the area Table 1 shows a summary of construction emissions with and without mitigation measures The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to sensitive receptors will be at less than significant levels 6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed protect is the subdivision of 20 15 acres of land into 109 single-family lots in one phase The end use of the proposed residential protect will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors Potenhelly SlBnrticant Impact Less Information Sources ortin nd Su I Petanhally unless Than g pp ssues a SpnRVant Im ed MitpaLOn Into tee Sgn~fwnt Im eh No Im ect 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result ~n a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions O O (~) ( ) • b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (~) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) L1 ~ ~ ` Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Pptannalty SgnRroant Impel Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pptaniwity unless roan SgnRpm Msgalion Sgn~franl No Im d In ta0 Impact Im d c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () ( ) () (~) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () ( ) () (~) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists () ( ) () (~) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () ( ) () (~) alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O O (~) Comments: a) The proposed subdivision will generate approximately 1,122 total trips as calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual 6~' edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model The protect proponent will be required to construct necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect b-d) Access to the site will be provided off of Milliken Avenue by "A Street "Additional access will be provided along Base Line Road by turning north on Ellena West (located along the site's eastern boundary) and west onto proposed "E Street "Both proposed streets will allow full access without impeding the through traffic Access for emergency vehicles is adequate with all interior streets having standard 35-foot widths e/f) The new facility will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists because adequate points of ingress/egress have been provided and there is adequate parking along streets No bus turnout has been provided g) Located approximately eight miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft Potenaelty SiBndcant Impell Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Putantlalty unleaa roan SignRa;ant Mitipetron Sgndiwnt No Im ect Inm ate0 Im ad Im act r~ U • BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (~) habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) . b) Locally designated species (e g ,heritage trees, () () (~) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ LJIC 5Z Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Potentally SpMxanl Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentialy Unless Than SignRCant Mmgalion S,gnR¢ant No Im d Inm aleE Im act Im ea c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () () (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (/) vernal pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors () () () (/) Comments: a) The site is relatively level with no existing structures Aside from occasional thick patches of buckwheat and low-growing sage shrubs, the only other plant materials are annual and perennial grasses The site is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997 Based on this and surrounding development, the site does not contain appropriate habitat for any listed or endangered species C~ b-c) There are no existing trees onsite The applicant will be required to provide a Final Landscape Plan showing appropriate tree types and location d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site e) The area surrounding the site is currently developed Existing residential development occurs immediately east and north of the site, and commercial development occurs south of Base Line Road West of Milliken Avenue is the site of a future regional park Existing development around the site has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past Potentially Sgn~cant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources paaneally unlaaa man SignA,cant Mngaom Sgndicant No Impel Inm eteE Impact Impact 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State i~, C 53 Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Comments: a-b) The protect will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation c) The protect site occurs within an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2) An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization PMenaally SiBnRCant ImpaC Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Patatrtialn unlea: rnan SgMmanl MM1iBeOOn SgMrant No Im a In etaC Im Im act 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A nsk of accidental explosion or release of () ( ) () (~) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oii, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () ( ) () (~) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () ( ) () (~) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () ( ) () (~) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard m areas with flammable () ( ) () (~) brush, grass, or trees Comments: a-d) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses No evidence of discarded drums, containers, or hazardous wastes was observed There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site Potantlally SgnRraM ImpeG Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pptanaaly unless Than SgnRroant Mnpatron Sign~irant No Im Inm tea Im d Im a 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result ~n a) Increases in existing noise levels b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels O O (~) U O (~) O ( ) r1 U b, C 5`-~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 Page 13 • Comments: a) The protect would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area The impact is not considered significant b) The proposed protect is the construction of 109 single family residences immediate north of Base Line Road and east of Milliken Avenue An Acoustical Analysis prepared by Gordon Bracken 8 Assoaates (GBA) indicated that traffic noise from Milliken and Base Line would be the dominate noise impact for the area GBA reviewed the proposed protect to determine compliance with City of Rancho Cucamonga noise control regwrements of an exterior noise level of 65 CNEL and an interior noise level of 45 CNEL CNEL is the sound level in dBA which corresponds to the average energy content of the noise being measured over a 24-hour period Future traffic data for the noise analysis was received from the City traffic engineer Future traffic noise will exceed City, FHWA and Caltrans noise limits for exterior uses (e g backyards) and for some interior units adtacent to Base Line and Milliken Avenue The following mitigation measure will ensure exterior noise levels for these units are reduced to acceptable levels 9. An acoustical sound wall with earthen berm will be required at a height of seven feet for units 49 through 60, eight feet for units 36, 39, 41-45, 47 and 48, and nine feet for units- 29-35, 37, 38, 40 and 46, in order to reduce exterior noise levels at or below 65 CNEL. The wall shall be constructed of approved materials contained in the Acoustical Analysis. Walls greater than 8 feet in height shall require approval of a variance application. To mitigate interior noise levels, residential units shall be constructed as specified in Table 5 of the Acoustical Analysis The table is provided below as it appears in the analysis ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS BASIC BUILDING SHELL CHARACTERISTICS PANEL CONSTRUCTION Exterior Wall Siding or stucco, 2" x 4" studs, R-13 fiberglass insulation, 1/2" drywall Windows 3/32" double pane aluminum horizontal sliders Sliding Glass Door 3/16" double pane aluminum horizontal sliders Roof Shingle over 1/2" plywood, fiberglass insulation, 5/8" drywall, vented Floor Carpeted except kitchen and baths Construction minimums will provide around 20 dBA of interior noise reduction This • is adequate for all units with the exception of Lots 29 through 62 which face Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road and will be exposed to exterior noise levels as high as 74 dBA at the second floor The following mitigation measure will ensure interior noise levels for Lots 29 through 62 are reduced to significant levels 6, C~ 5S Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 10. Interior noise levels for first floor rooms of Lots 29 through 62 will be reduced by STC 24 sound-rated window glazing; second story rooms- will require STC 34 sound-rated window glazing; and exterior walls of second story rooms will require resilient channels. Additionally, all second story rooms for these lots will be required to baffle attic vents. (Vent baffles are devices which absorb sound passing into the attic through the attic vent openings. The baffle is made of 3.5 inch-think fiberglass and is twice the size of the vent opening, and is mounted or suspended 12 inches in front of the vent.) The remainder of the lots will receive sufficient shielding from intervening houses and will not require additional noise control measures beyond construction details contained in the acoustical analysis in order to comply with the interior City CNEL limit of 45 dBA PotanOally S,Bndiwnl ImpeU Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pptannely $,BnRiwnl unless MiOBatwn rnan SiBnRwnt No ImpaU Inwryorelsd ImpaU ImpaU 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services m any of the following areas a) Fire protections O O O (~) b) Police protections O O O ('') c) Schools () () (~) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () (~) ( ) e) Other governmental services U O O (~) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The protect site is located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road, and is served by the Foothill Fire Protection District The nearest fire station is located on Base Line Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard, approximately 2 miles east of the site The Foothill Fire District is responsible for evaluating the protect through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process The proposed protect will include structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code No mitigation is required Police Protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriffs Department The proposed residential development will include standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and doors Additional police protection is not required as the addition of 109 single family residential homes will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled as the protect site is small, approximately 20 15 acres B, C SI.Q Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Schools -The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint High School District serve the protect area Development of the site under existing zoning would have generated 79 students Under proposed zoning, the protect will generate 72 students Therefore the proposed protect will decrease students for the Etiwanda School District Chaffey Joint High School has a standard student generation rate which protects 23 students under the residential zoning Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the state mandated school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant Parks -The proposed protect is part of the Victoria Community which includes a series of villages that have a central open space as their focus For example, many of the villages include multi-use school-park-community facility A community wide open-space system known as Victoria Parkway will tie the villages together and will connect with other existing trails and proposed open space systems Additionally, the protect is located south and adtacent to the future Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, aClass Imulti-use bicycle, pedestrian, and separated equestrian trail located within the existing Pacific Electric Railroad nght-of-way, which vanes in width from 80 feet to 100 feet, within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga Funds for planning, acquisition, development and operation of public parks will . come from the Park Development Fund The Park Development Fund, established by Ordinance No 8 (adopted in December 1977) and later followed by Ordinance No 105 (adopted in June 1980), requires dedication of land, payment of fees or a combination thereof The applicant will be required to pay in-lieu fees to offset impacts c) Public facilities - An amendment to the Victona Community Plan is proposed to reflect a change in density from Medium and Medium-High Residential to Low- Medium Residential The proposed protect will actually decrease anticipated traffic within the area, and will be consistent will the City's Victoria Community Plan which designates the area residential with suspected future traffic after development The protect proponent will be regwred to construct necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect Potsntielty s,enR~m ImpeU Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources paemianr unless men Signdicent Mrtigetron Signdiwnt No Im ed Incoryoreled Impact Im act 12 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result ~n a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utdit~es a) Power or natural gasp b) Communication systems c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution O O O (~) O O O (~) O O O (~) facihties~ t3, G 5 ~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Potenbelly Signdiwnl Impaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless Tian Signtl~nt MNgeoon Sign~cenl No Impact Into tatl Impact Impaa d) Sewer or septic tanks O O O (~) e) Storm water drainages O O (~) ( ) f) Solid waste disposai~ O O O (~) g) Local or regional water supplies O O O (~) Comments: a-g) The proposed subdivision will include the construction of 109 single-family residential dwellings The proposed development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area Utility systems installed to service existing development within the area, are adequate and will not require major modifications or alterations Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler Waste will be disposed of at the County of San Bernardino Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill The protect will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site A Final Drainage Report shall be submitted for City Engineer review and approval Additional mitigation is not proposed or required Patentialy SignRrant Impaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potanhaln unlasa Than SgnRCant Mtlgebm SignRCant No Im as Ir,m tatl Im as Im a 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways O O O (~) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (~) c) Create light or glares O O O (~) Comments: a-b) The project site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway The intersection is designated as a Minor Community Entry by the Victoria Community Plan where special landscape treatment will be provided The area is designated Medium and Medium-High Residential within the Victoria Community Plan The applicant is proposing an amendment to the Plan that would designate the entire project site Low-Medium Residential The proposed development will be consistent with current surrounding development c) The protect will create new light and glare as the site is currently vacant However, the site has been identified as a residential site so new light will not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as other residential development in the area r~ U r1 L J L~ (~)G 58 • Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Potenbelly SlgnRwnt Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenealy uMaas Than Sign cant MM1igahan Sign~caM No Impact Into oraletl Im ad Im ad 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb Paleontological resources O O O (~) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (~) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (~) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (~) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural ,resources The site is located in a developing residential area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the protect site Potantialty SignR¢ant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PoleMially Unless Than SignRcant MNgation SiBnRwant No Im ad Into tatl Impact Im ad 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () (~) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities O O U (~) Comments: a) The site is located 1500 feet west of Ellena Park, a neighborhood park A planned community park, Central Park, is planned across the street on the west side of Milliken Avenue The developer of the protect will be required to pay park development fees as a condition of approval The impact is not considered significant b) The proposed protect will be constructed on vacant land, which is planned for residential development Adjacent lands, with the exception of areas south and west of the site, are also designated residential and are currently developed The protect site is located south and adjacent to the Pacific Electric Inland Empire - a Class I multi-use trail to include local and regional bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian facilities The trail will also include a 45-foot corridor within the right-of- way for potential future transit use and the integration of existing transportation infrastructure including links to rail, bus, multi-modal stations Additionally the area west of the site across Milliken Avenue is the site of the City's future regional park 6, c 5~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Potanaally SlgnRcant Impap Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unleaa Tnan Signdicant Mitigation SlgnRCSnt No Impact IncorporateE Impact Impact 16 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the () () () (~) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the project have the potential () () (~) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively beef, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that () () (~) () are individually limited, but cumulatively considerabie~ ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects ) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have () () () (~) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The Initial Study did not identify any significant adverse impacts to biological resources The occurrence of buckwheat onsite could have provided habitat at one point However, due to surrounding development, Base Line Road, Milliken Avenue and residential development, the protect site does not contain appropriate habitat for any listed endangered or threaten speaes • b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality with development of the project site The short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction activities However, the impacts will cease once construction actvities are completed Implementation of mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study 6 , G CQD Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 and standard Conditions of Approval will reduce short-term impacts to less than sigmficant c) The project is part of the Victoria Community Plan Cumulative effects of residential development in the plan area were identified in a previous environmental document Appropriate analysis and mitigation measures were developed prior to the implementation of the plan No additional mitigation measures beyond those presented in the plan and this Initial Study are required d) Development of 109 single-family residences would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identified construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact However, proposed mitigation measures wdl reduce impacts to less than significant Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality are short-term and will cease once construction activities are completed An Acoustical Analysis prepared by Gordon Bracken & Assoaates (GBA) indicated that traffic noise from Milliken and Base Lme would be the dominate noise impact for the area GBA reviewed the proposed project to determine compliance with City noise control regwrements of an exterior noise level of 65 CNEL and an interior noise level of 45 CNEL Future traffic data for the noise analysis was received from the City traffic engineer Future traffic noise was found to exceed interior and exterior Gity, FHWA and Caltrans noise limits for units adtacent to Base Lme Road and Milliken Avenue (Lots 29 through 62) To mitigate interior noise levels, all residential units shall be constructed as speafied in the Acoustical Analysis Implementation of appropriate budding materials will be adequate for all units with the exception of Lots 29 through 62 which face Milliken Avenue and Base Lme Road Exterior noise levels at these units will be as high as 74 dBA at the second floor Mitigation measures contained m this Initial Study will ensure exterior and interior noise levels for Lots 29 through 62 are reduced to significant levels The remainder of the lots wdl receive sufficient shielding from intervening houses and will not regwre additional noise control measures beyond construction details contained in the acoustical analysis in order to comply with the interior City CNEL limit of 45 dBA diG ~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract Map 16239, DRC2001-00262 EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CECW process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized m completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (~) Victona Community Plan EIR (Certified 1983) (~) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft General Plan (June 2001) (~) Gordon Bracken & Associates, Acoustical Analysis for the Arbor Crest Tract No 16239, July 27, 2001 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect descnbed m this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the osed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/ ereb agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitig a the eff s to a p nit where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur.//// Signature) / Date• ~~~ ~>' Print Name and itle / ~~~i/~ ~!.`~~~~ r1 -...J LJ a,~ ~2 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the Cali/omia Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map Subtt16239 And Development Review Drc2001-00262 Public Review Period Closes: September 26, 2001 Project Name: Project Applicant: Drversfied Pacific D(PDG Fund III, LLC) Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and MtllikenAvenue-APN 227-&91-01 Project Description: The subdmsion of 20 15 acres of land into 109 lots and the design review of budding elevations and detailed sile plan for single-family home construction in the Low-Medium Distnct (4-8 dwelling unds per acre) of the vctona Communily Plan Related file vctona Commundy Plan Amendment DRC2001-00263 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine N the project may have a s~gndicant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The In~hal Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment ® The In~6al Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed tc by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment tF adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The projectfile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. • September 26.2001 Date of Determination Adopted By ~I~ ~/ • RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16239 IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLINGS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 227-691-01 A Recitals 1 Diversified Pacific filed an application for Tentative Tract No 16239 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract is referred to as "the application " 2. On September 12, and continued to September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearings on September 12, and 26, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 20 15 acres of land, basicaly a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and b The property to the north of the subtect site is designated Low Residential and is developed The property to the west is designated for a park and is vacant The property to the east is designated Low-Medwm Residential and is developed The property to the south is designated Neighborhood Commercial and is developed, and c The proposed protect wdl not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Victoria Community Plan, and wdl prowde for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan designation of Low-Medwm and with related development, and d This protect does promote the goals and obtectives of the Victoria Community Plan and the Low-Medwm Residential District, and e This protect would not be materially intunous or detrimental to the adfacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surcounding properties, and R - c c~`I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TT SUBTT16239 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 Page 2 This project will be consistent with Development Code and the surrounding land uses 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not Irkely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict v~nth any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together vnth all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaratron and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habtat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Calrfomia Code of Regulations (~~ ~ ~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TT SUBTT16239 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves Tentative Tract SUBTT16239 subject to the conditions set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannma Diwsion 1) The approval granted herein is for the subdivision of 21 acres of land into 109 single-family lots 2) Wall heights on Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue shall not exceed 6 feet in height The wall design shall match the established Victona Planned Community theme walls Enameenng Diwswn 1) Landscaping shall comply with the Beautification Master Plans for Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, including substantial areas of rockscape and meandenng sidewalks 2) The project will disrupt existing City-maintained parkways and medians on Milliken Avenue It will regwre revisions to existing City plans to bnng them up to current standards m addition to the preparation of the new plans Also dunng construction, the developerwill be responsible for taking over maintenance of all affected areas until the Gty accepts the work m both the new and disrupted areas 3) The existing median landscaping on Milliken Avenue adjacent to the proposed site shall be reconstructed to be consistent with the remaining median along Milliken Avenue 4) The parkways along Ellena West requve a 5-foot minimum planting area between the walk and the wall 5) Lot 29 requires a comer cut-off in the northwest comer for a landscape entry statement to the recently adopted Pacific Electnc Trail 6) Install a northbound bus bay and nght tum lane for the entry street on Milliken Avenue 7) Provide additional nght-of-way along Ellena West from Base Line Road to "E" Street for left tum lanes at Base Lme Road, and for a nght tum and through lane southbound to Base Lme Road (48 feet curb to curb, 20 feet SBRT, 10 feet LT, and 18 feet NB) 8) Install a traffic signal at Base Line Road and Ellena West with Transportation Fee Credit 9) Provide Class II "Bike Lane" along Base Lme Road frontage, and Class III "Bike Route" along Milliken Avenue frontage. 10) No additional median openings on Base Lme Road or Milliken Avenue 6iC ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TT SUBTT16239 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 Page 4 11) The manhole location within the drainage easement at Ellena West is difficult to service Relocate the manhole to an area within the street 12) Entry monumentation noted on the plans is not to be provided with this project, as it will not be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance Distnct Environmental Mitigation Measures Water 1) Pnorto issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identdythe Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Air Quat~ty 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by the SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions in accordance with SCAQMD, Rule 403 2) Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the Cdy to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when v~nnd speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM,o emissions form the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low emission factors and high energy-efficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers speafications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use a,~ c~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TT SUBTT16239 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 Page 5 Norse 1) An acoustical sound wall with earthen berm will be required at a height of 7 feet for units 49-60, 8 feet for units 36, 39, 41-45, 47 and 48, and 9 feet for units 29-35, 37, 38, 40 and 46, in order to reduce extenor noise levels at or below 65 CNEL The wall shall be constructed of approved matenals contained in the Acoustical Analysis Walls greaterthan 8 feet in height shall regwre approval of a vanance application 2) Intenor noise levels for first floor rooms of Lots 29-62 wdl be reduced by STC 24 sound-rated window glazing, second story rooms wdl regwre STC 34 sound-rated window glazing, extenor walls of second story rooms wdl regwre resilient channels Additionally, all second story rooms for these lots wdl be required to baffle attic vents (Vent baffles are devices which absorb sound passing into the attic through the attic vent openings The baffle is made of 3 5-inch-thick fiberglass, is twice the size of the vent opening, and is mounted or suspended 12 inches in front of the vent ) 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the folloHnng vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS 6, ~ (08 ~J City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT16239 AND DRCDR2001-00262 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 B ~ c le°- Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT16239 AND DRCDR2001-00262 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further momtonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unantiapated circumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planneror responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planneror responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessaryfunds (orotherforms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Citystaff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9 In those instances requiring long-tenn protect monitoring, the applicant shall prowde the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an indiwdual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of budding permits • ll t C I"~ ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT16239 Applicant: DPDG Fund II1. LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Nancv Ferguson Date: August 23. 2001 i - . -~ Aiir~Cliia~ily„~,`;`~~~,w{~~.~r ,'~",~,€~R'P.~,: ~ pp~~ p ai `fin ~ r ~ Yrv~; ~,6'f "`x~x ~~'~~"'~r ~ ' " ~R ~-.. ~ ,,': '~,~~`~`~°,.:' _ i _ ~ , a b ~ x i h ~:e. ~^ . ~~/t4Y iik. ~~n4~ The sde shall be treated with water or other soil stabitinng agent) CP C Rewew of plans A/C p approved by SCADMD and RWpCB) daily to reduce PM,o emission, m accordance vnM SCAQMD Rule 403 Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road shall be swept as»rding to a CP C Review of plans A/C 2 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated Nnth vehide tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of censWchon Grading operations shall be suspended when w(nd speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2 episodes Chemicel soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWDCB) shall be applied to all inactive wnsWChon areas that remain inactive for CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Contractor shall select the consWchon equipment based on low emission factors and high-energy effiaency All construction CP BIC Rewew of plans A/C 2 equipment xnll be tuned and maintained in as»rdance vnth the manufacturers speaficehons Contractor shall utilize electnc or dean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible CP B/C Rewew of plans A/C 2 The censWction contractor shall ensure Mat censtrudlon~radmg plans indude a statement that work news wrll shut off egwpment CP/CE 8 Rewew of plans C 2 when not in use s ~i ~~`~{ F.,l `>° `.iir ~r i ; '~! d"yu':~,;,,a n;4, n Water ~ ~€ , ^ ))y"~; ? ~~~t"~r~' 'rtim ~ tfi `"~ ` ~" " ' ' t ~ ~ ' ~ sT {""'" fu ''m. ''~ a ~u ~~ ~~~ ,k5.', i' 4 Y `~ ~'NJ { ~ ~ ~~v~fi fuss II ~ w ^w;, ~ )t y ~.,,~, ~~.,~.d ~~~"~~n`r~ t ' ^~ ' ~ ~ .. , Y , 2 ^^vr+n:,d'~f h4 <.i rt t x,4 'x " Y k ,".d1,. ~ n a~'tFm a C 4 :L'a`~>~7`rR" a1 . .~. ~ c ~r;R~'~ , .n .ai: $ , .b,~~:,z~x1n V ~ zt' ~ a^;a:..,'~"" ''' yr. ` r, . ~ , Pnor to Issuance of grading permits, Me applicant shall identify CP/CE B Rewew of plans C 2 BMPs to be implemented dunng Me penod Me site is under consWchon BMPS shall be identified on Me grading plans for rewew and approval by the City Engineer ^y~., , ~ ° vj ~ , a ~ryr~~Y{. . ~i' ~* x Noise-.~:~ .. = ~ t~F ?, J~, ~i f."" T` "~'G -:~ y Sit t rv~ t, '}rte n f . ~~~., ~". hx ~h {55(Y~ '~ 1 ~ ,31~o'.t:~~.Z.~J F~~ ~*, inn a ~ ~ yy ;fir' Yj35'v "i} • ,.. ^+'.a.sS~F"~ppyy. fi_n FMdA>a vl3' ~yq v~_,_':.ro °' #•~nf~}~.., ~'k ~5e µ t>!, n#,~"', v~ ,ti° k~~ "J1i" 1^, ,~-` 4 $s v ~' t^~`.'..~4~frv. F, 0~'4,},+~ a ~ t < An acoustical sound wall volt be requred at a height of 7 feet for CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 units 49 through 60, 8 feet for units 36, 39, 41-45, 47 and 48 and 9 , feet for units 29-35, 37, 38, 40 and 46, in order to reduce eMenor noise levels at or below 65 CNEL The wall shall be constructed of approved matenals contained in the Acoustla3l Analysis Intenor noise levels for first floor rooms of Lots 29 through 62 volt be reduced by STC 24 sound-rated vnndow glanng, second story CP/CE B Renew of plans C C rooms will requue STC 34 sound-rated vnndow glavng, and extenor walls of second story rooms for these lots will regwre resrhent channels Additlonally, all second story rooms for these lots wall be required to baffle attic vents (Vent baffles are devices which absorb sound passing into the attic through the altlc vent openings The baffle is made of 3 S inch-thick fiberglass and rs twice the size of the vent opening, and rs mounted or suspended 12 inches in front of the vent) Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res onsitile`Person ~ ~ _ - "' .F? ~_. " ,' ~ r Morittorin F ` ; , ~'"-~" . -~. 9 req!!en~aS3 s`S.~a~k,~)s•+_i~ ~ ~' ' ~,Mg}Ijpdo~lYeriffcatlon,~~,~r~~';~s~r*,~#r~~zir Sanctio~".,.:he~;v2~:'~' , -,' °_ „_~, ,~ CDD -Community Development Director A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWctlon B~- Other Agency Permd /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwldmg Permd CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certlficete of Occupancy BO - Building Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operatlng 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Frre Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEOA\MMCHKLST WPD ~~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT16239 SUBJECT: 109 Single-family homes APPLICANT: Diversified Pacific LOCATION: N/E Corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No 16239 is granted subject to the approval of DR2001-00262 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, bwlding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 All site, grading, landscape, irrgation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwiding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first ComoleUOn Date / / / / / / / / / / SC-06-01 1 (Z (~ ~"~ Protect No SUBTT16239 Comole6on Date 2 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, _/_/_ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance • 3 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval rn accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Namrng Poltcy prior to approval of the final map 4 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of ail _/_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limned to, public notice requirements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fenang 5 Six-foot decorattve block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the pro/ect's perimeter D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and trrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of restdential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submttted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more to verttcal height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, tmigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by thts section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes to excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet m vertical hetght and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and trigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger stze tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger stze shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks rn excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent vngatton system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained m a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each tndrvidual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are to satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be requred per the Development _/_/_ Code and/or Victoria Community Plan This regwrement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included _/_/_ in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Dvision 7 Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_I_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Milliken Avenue and Base Lrne Road 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division SC-06-01 2 4.J,~ ~y Protect No SUBTT16239 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, ~R COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. E. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_I_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are requved for fencing and/or walls _/_/ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City Licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the Ctty pnor to permit issuance F. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/ marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations to effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to tssuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mator addition to _/_/_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Ctty Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and _/_/_ pnor to tssuance of bwldtng permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _// through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering _/_/_ use, area, and fire-resistiveness SC-06-01 3 p) G Protect No SUBTT16239 ComoleGOn Date 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/~ H. Grading 1 Gradrng of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City _/_I_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits _/_/_ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_I_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: CALL JOE STOFA AT EXT. 4017 FOR FURTHER REVIEW. I. Dedication and Vehicular Access • 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-o~way on the perimeter streets (measured from /_/_ street centerline) 60 total feet on Milliken Avenue _/_/_ 60 total feet on Base Line Road / / 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the Ctty for the following streets, except for _/_/_ approved openings Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be _/_/_ dedicated to the City 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 _/_/_ feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adtacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided J. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped _/_I_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, streetights, and street trees SC-06-01 4 k/'I~ Protect No SUBTT16239 Completion Date 2 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 AC Side- Dnve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Milliken Avenue X X c X X a X Base Llne Road X X c X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays well be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified ~ e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program SC-O6-01 5 2 ~ l~ ~ '(- -/-/- -/-/. / / / / -//- -/-/- -/-/- / / / / _/-/. Prgect No SUBTr16239 Comolehon Date 5 Intersection Itne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required K. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Milliken Avenue, Base Line Road, Ellena West and Milliken Avenue Median 2 Public landscape areas are requred to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 Ali regwred publtc landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Victoria Community Plan L. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faaltties shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the publtc street M. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdroision or prior to the issuance of permits to the case of all other residential projects -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- SC-O6-01 6 ~\~ Prgecl No SUBTT16239 ComoleGOn Date 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them N. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Permits shall be obtained from the following agenaes for work within their right-of-way Southern /_/_ Paafic Railroad 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to finalization of any development phase, suffiaent improvement plans shall be completed _/_/_ beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: CALL STEVE LOCATI FOR FUTHER REVIEW. O. Community Facilities Districts 1 This protect is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distract _/_/_ P. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of _/_/_ all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ speafications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Fire flow requirements for this protect shall be 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual _/_/_ pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fve hydrants located in accordance with Fve Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, Flushed and operable prior to delivering any _/_/_ combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 5 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan _/_/_ submitted for review and approval Include main size 6 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ speafications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 7 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective _/_/_ pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Re/iect~ve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a bwiding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire _/_/_ flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga SC.06-~, 7 6 ~ c ~ Protect No SUBTT16239 Comoletion Date Ftre Protection District If suffiaent water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow R. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fire _/_I_ sprinkler system S. Fire Access 1 Residential & Commeraal Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and _/_/_ obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Ftre District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured Flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&Rs, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Droision 2 The minimum width for a Fire District access road or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum inside turn _/_/_ radius is 20 feet The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 3 A note shall be placed on all plans which cleady indicates the following Emergency access, a _/_/_ minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 4 Prior to the issuance of a budding permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from _/_/_ the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in tnndth The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 5 New residential buildings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting _/_/_ background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry T. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the bwider _/_/_ shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site U. Fees 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga _/_/_ Fire District as follows " X $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection X $132 for Single-family Residential Development "Note Separate plan check fees far tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans S~-os.o, 8 b ~ C ~0 Protect No SUBTT16239 ComoleGOn Date V. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, _/_/_ Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems andlor any consultant rewews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction pro/acts and for existing bwidings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engrneer 2 Prior to Planning approval, the applicant must address all fire issues _/_/_ • S~-0s-0, 9 b,G ~\ RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00262, THE DESIGN REVIEW FORTENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16239 FOR 109 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLINGS PERACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 227-691-01 A ReGtals 1 Diversified Paafic filed an application for Development Review No DRC2001-00262 as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review is referred to as "the application " 2 On September 12, and September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on September 12, and September 26, 2001, inGuding wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 20 15 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast comer OF Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre), and b The property to the north of the subtect site is designated Low Residential and is developed The property to the west is designated for a park and is vacant The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential and is developed The property to the south is designated Neighborhood Commercial and is developed, and c This amendment does not conflict wrath the Land Use Policies of the Victona Community Plan and will provide for development within the distnd in a manner consistent with the General Plan designation of Low-Medum and with related development, and • d This protect does promote the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Plan for Victona Planned Community, and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00262 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 Page 2 e This project would not be matenally intunous or detnmental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and tnps This project would lower the density, hence, would also significantly reduce vehiGe 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Victona Community Plan, and d That the proposed design, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto, vwll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Decaration has been prepared in compliance ~nnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Decaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habilat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning . Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 6,C ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00262 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Review No DRC2001-00262 subtect to the conditions set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Drvision 1) All conditions contained m the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 16239 shall apply 2) Grading plan shall be revised to incorporate the sound attenuation berm and wall height for the property Ime walls located on Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue 3) Intenor property Ime walls shall be stucco finish with a light base color to be consistent with approved elevations, subtect to Planning Commission approval 4) A 6-foot high masonry wall shall be provided along Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue The wall shall be staggered to offset and increase visual interest and landscaping Walls and landscape shall • match Victona Parkway theme walls, mcludmg sidewalk, landscaping and any approved signs 5) Balconies shall be included in the street scene on Base Lme Road and Milliken Avenue 6) Provide a curvilinear sidewalk on Base Line Road 7) A minimum parkway area of 13 feet fronting on Milliken Avenue and 6 feet of parkway behind the sidewalk shall be provided as shown in the Victona Community Plan 8) A minimum parkway area of 13 feet fronting on Base Lme Road and 12 feet of parkway behind the sidewalk shall be provided as shown m the Victona Community Plan 9) Provide a minimum of 5 feet distance between the back of sidewalk and comer sidewals on all comer lots Enaineennu Division 1) Landscaping shall comply with the Beautification Master Plans for Base Lme Road and Milliken Avenue, mcludmg substantial areas of rockscape and meandenng sidewalks • 2) The protect will disrupt existing City-maintained parkways and medians on Milliken Avenue It will regwre revisions to existing City plans, to bnng them up to current standards in adddion to the preparation of the new plans Also dunng construction, the developer a,G ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00262 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 Page 4 will be responsible for taking over maintenance of all affected areas until the City accepts the work in both the new and disrupted areas 3) The existing median landscaping in Milliken Avenue adtacent to the proposed site shall be reconstructed to be consistent with the remaining median along Milliken Avenue 4) The parkways along Ellena West require a 5-foot minimum planting area between the walk and the wall 5) Lot 29 regwres a comer cut-off in the NWC for a landscape entry statement to the recently adopted Pacific Electnc Trail 6) Install a northbound bus bay and nght tum lane for the entry street on Milliken Avenue 7) Provide additional right-of-way along Ellena West from Base Line Road to "E" Street for left tum lanes at Base Line Road and for a nght tum and through lane southbound to Base Line Road (48 feet curb to curb, 20 feet SBRT, 10 LT and 18 inches NB) 8) Install a traffic signal at Base Line Road and Ellena West wrath Transportation Fee Credit 9) Provde Class II "Bike Lane" along Base Lme Road frontage and Class III "Bike Route" along Milliken frontage 10) No additional median openings on Base Lme Road or Milliken Avenue 11) The manhole location within the drainage easement at Ellena West is difficult to service Relocate the manhole to an area within the street 12) Entry monumentation noted on the plans is not to be provided with this protect, as it will not be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance Distract Environmental Mitioation Measures Water 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated vhth water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by the SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions in accordance ~nnth SCAQMD Rule 403 b, ~ ~b5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00262 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 • Page 5 2) Milliken Avenue and Base Lme Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated v~nth vehicle tracking of sod off site Timing may vary depending upon time of year construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM,o emissions form the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain mactrve for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high energy- efficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipmentvhll be tuned and maintained m accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altematwe fuel powered equpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use Norse 1) An acoustical sound wall with earthen berm will be required at a height of 7 feet for units 49 through 60, 8 feet for units 36, 39, 41-45, 47 and 48, and 9 feet for units 29-35, 37, 38, 40 and 46, m order to reduce extenor noise levels at or below 65 CNEL The wall shall be constructed of approved matenals contained m the Acoustical Analysis Walls greater than 8 feet m height shall require approval of a vanance application 2) Intenor noise levels for first floor rooms of Lots 29-62 will be reduced by STC 24 sound-rated window glazing, second story rooms well requre STC 34sound-rated window glazing, extenorwalls of second story rooms will require resilient channels Additionally, all second story rooms for these lots will be required to baffle attic vents (Vent baffles are devices which absorb sound passing into the atticthrough the attic vent openings The baffle is made of 3 5-mch thick fiberglass, is twice the size of the vent opening, and is mounted or suspended 12 inches in front of the vent ) 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution a~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00262 -DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC September 26, 2001 Page 6 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Lany T McNiel, Chaurnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-+nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~,~ ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT16239 AND DRCDR2001-00262 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As morntonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for-the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in perfonning monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Morntonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division . 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~t~ ~~ Mitigation Morntonng Program SUBTT16239 AND DRCDR2001-00262 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unantiapated arcumstances may arise requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance: of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department The Department shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or otherfomts of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor Cdy staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of bwlding permits • b , c~ ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRCDR2001-00262 Applicant: DPDG Fund III. LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Nancv Ferguson Date: Auoust 23. 2001 i/'~ 1- • .. ~ ... •. -• . .. r. ~ J, ~AIr`'Ciuality~`,"4jr'€2x; ~,, w$~~s,~~xx~ ,. - .. Y ; .'r~° ~ x ~ ~ >~~ ~_ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ..{.,„ ~ ' } ' f F ~ S ~ The site shall be treated vnth water or other soil stabiliLng agent) CP C Review of plans AIC _ , r y approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emission, in aa»rdance with SCAQMD Rule 403 M~Iliken Avenue and Baseline Road shall be swept aabrding to a CP C Review of plans AIC p schedule established by the City to reduce PMro emissions assoaated with vehide tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of censWcbon Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such CP C Review of plans A/C p episodes Chemipl soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all macbve consWcGOn areas that remain macbve for CP C Review of plans A/C p 96 hours or rrrora to reduce PM~o emissions Contractor shall select the censWchon equipment based on low emission factors and high-energy effiaenry All construction Cp B/C Review of plans A/C p equipment will be tuned and maintained in axordance vnth the manufacturer's speafications Contractor shall utilize elednc or dean alternative fuel powered egwpmenl where feasible CP B/C Review of tans p A/C 2 The censWchon contractor shall ensure that consWchon-grading plans indude a statement that work news will shut off equipment CPICE B Review of plans C 2 when not In use VVetBG~ °~rY{{~,' ;~~~ v" ~ - ~:. .. d r .a~~~ytiN l ! ~ ' ~ v~- ~~~ ~cr~~e~, ~,. + ^PUx~'~~~ z-yi~~ ~~ '. t ~~ ` f ~` ~~ ~ ~'r yl`-~ ~~ .~; `;ur"i';a 4 ' ' -. arCYai ~ ..\ r ~/ .~`# -nSrv S'i,~~~tsaia j p ~~ ..e€F~~~RY,jtl R J~•~ 5 b"1'e ~' Yai,r, ~{'? ` ' y yy X-v S.Aa ~'.F .$Y ww+< f.4 Pnor to issuance of grading permits, Me applicent shall identity CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 BMPs to be Implemented dunng the penod the site is under consWction BMPS shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer .. . ~5 A,FY., f ~~~ ~ l' M J. t,`~ ~ ' 1' 'a ° 1~ .aya~ . a . '^~Y~ ~ ~ ,<+lf,. u ' r (` ':'.' ~y k y ~ ~~" Sr• '`Yu)9 i ' ~ ~} +"'~ ~ T *~^4:5M'"%" ~ ~r r` 'r'` •;~ 5 i. y _ y ~ ~ a ^~ . . 4 ; w J; 7 .. An aceustipl sound wall will be required at a height of 7 feet for CP/CE B Rewew of plans C 2 units 49 through 60, 6 feet for units 36, 39, 4145, 47 and 48 and 9 , feet for units 29-35, 37, 38, 40 and 46, in order to reduce extenor noise levels at or below 65 CNEL The wall shall be constructed of approved matedals contained in the Acoustical Analysis Intenor noise levels for first floor rooms of Lofs 29 through 62 will be reduced by STC 24 sound-rated window glanng, second story CP/CE t3 Rewew of plans C C rooms will require STC 34 sound-rated window glazJng, and extenor walls of second story rooms for these tots will require resilient channels Additionally, all second story rooms for these lots will be requred to baffle attic vents (Vent baffles are devices which absorb sound passing Into the attic through the attic vent openings The baffle is made of 3 S inch-thick fiberglass and is twice the size of the vent opening, and is mounted or suspended 12 inches in front of the vent) Key to Checklist Abbreviations +R~spOn"s-Ible'~Per~on ~';~1; _'*''';~' ~'- - ~. , ~ },MoMtorin'F °t~i '' s«.Y. . ,-..9., re4!!a~oYcti.t ~i`~°•'arn," 15; °+;r`r„u.r~ r, ~.,~ ,?Metfiodof,VeilticaUq~ s'd Xt;~ ~ '' "3 a' r, ,. fsd~Ctions. `fir ST. ,, . ; ~ }/ • CDD -Community Development Duector A - Wifh Each New Development .~rx~ , t + A - On-site Inspection a_ , > - _ : 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee 8 - Pnor To Construction 8 -Other Agenq Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Greding or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWction C -Plan Chedr 3 -Withhold Certifipte of Ocwpancy BO -Building Offidal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEOAVu1MCHKLST WPD P (~ ! i i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00262 SUBJECT: 109 Singie-family homes APPLICANT: Diversified Paafic LOCATION: N/E Corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sale expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or rn the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No 16239 is granted subtect to the approval of DRC2001-00262 3 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, bwlding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval 2 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed • Comolehon Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- Protect No DRC2001-00262 Comole6on Date C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include . / / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and _ _ _ grading on file in the planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan 2 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/ / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 3 All site, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ _ time of building permit issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete _ _ _ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map _ _ _ 7 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conci / / se manner, _ _ including proper illumination 8 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall / ! condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining _ _ _ property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 9 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk / / 10 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 11 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real aver rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products D. Building Design 1 All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, _/_/_ detailing and increased delineation of surtace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits 2 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and _ streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the budding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans • sc-o6-o, z d , ~ ~ 3 Protect No DRC2001-00262 Completion Date ~. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdrnsion 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, vrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet m vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and vrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Victoria Community Plan This regwrement shall be in addition to the requred street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 7 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division F. Environmental A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the budding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, SC-06-01 3 V tl~ - I~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/ / / Protect N o DRC2001-00262 ComoleGOn Date c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, tncluding isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air condi4oning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/ / Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal _ _ 3 Separate permits are requred for fenang and/or walls _/_/_ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / / the City prior to permtt issuance _ _ _ H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to constructton All plans shall be _/_/ marked with the protect file number (t a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest _ adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations to effect at the bme of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Diwston for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts • 2 Prior to issuance of budding permtts for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mayor addition to _/_/_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Ctty Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permtt issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and _/_/_ prior to issuance of building permtts 4 Construction actroity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no constructton on Sunday or holidays I. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property Itne clearances considering _/_/_ use, area, and fire-reststrveness 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for regwred occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ J. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City _/_/ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in ~ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan SC-06-01 4 L , G ` S Prolec[ No DRC2001-00262 Comolehon Date 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified englneer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or mare of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Ciwl Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: CALL JOE STOFA AT EXT. 4017 FOR FURTHER REVIEW K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total feet on Milliken Avenue 60 total feet on Base Line Road 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road • 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided L. Street Improvements • 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike aner Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Milliken Avenue X X c X X a X Base Line Road X X c X X X 3 Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/, -/-/- _/_/_ _/_/_ / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-06-01 5 V t ~ ~ t Protect No DRC2001-00262 ComoleGon Date Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first • b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _/_/_ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condut, and _/_I_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engrneer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ pro/ect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Ctty _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requinng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drams shall be _/_/_ installed to Ctty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_I_ accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required M. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall _/_/_ be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Milliken Avenue, Base Line Road, Ellena West and Milliken Avenue Median 2 Public landscape areas are regwred to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or _//_ other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 3 A signed consent and waiver farm to /oin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer • SC-06-01 6 ~ \ ~ ~ T Protect No DRC2001-00262 ComoleUOn Dale 4 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Victoria Community Plan N. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street O. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fir@ Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdmsion or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Permits shall be obtained from the following agenaes for work within their right-of-way Southern Pacific Railroad 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~_~. -~-~ -~-~- _~_~ -~-~- -~-~. SC-06-01 7 ~ \ ~ ~v Protect No DRC2001-00262 Comoledon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: CONTACT STEVE LOCATI FOR FURTHER REVIEW. Q. Community Facilities Districts 1 This pro/ect is subtect to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Faalities District _/_/_ R. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of _/_/_ ail new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Ftre District and the Water Distract 2 Prior to the tssuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Fire flow requirements for this protect shall be 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual _/_/_ pressure of 20 pounds per square inch to accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire Flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any _/_/_ combustible bwlding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submtt test report to the Ftre Safety Dmston 5 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan I _/_/ submitted for rewew and approval Include main size 6 Prior to the tssuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submtt construction plans, _/_/~ specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 7 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective _/_/_ pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "/nstallaf~on of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner S. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a budding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire _/_/_ Flow The Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If suffiaent water to meet fire Flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow T. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire /_/_ sprinkler system U. Fire Access 1 Residential & Commeraal Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and _/_/_~ obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be cleady marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise sc.OS.o, e 6 ,~ ~~ Protect No DRC2001-00262 Comolehon Date required Applicable CC&Rs, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modificetions in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 2 The minimum width for a Fve District access road or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum inside tum _/_/_ radius is 20 feet The minimum outside tum radius is 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet The minimum verticel clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 3 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the follovnng Emergency access, a _/_/_ minimum 26 feet in vndth and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire Distnct Standards 4 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from _/_/_ the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 5 New residential buildings shall post the address Hnth minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting _/_/_ background The numbers shall be intemaliy or externally illuminated dunng periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When buldng setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry V. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Regwred Note Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the bwlder _/ /_ shall submit a letter to the Fire Distnct on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site W. Fees 1 Fire Distnct fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga _/_/ Fire District as follows " _ X $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection X $132 for Single-family Residential Development "Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans X. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, _/_/_ Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction pro/acts and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of • combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer 2 Pnor to Planning approval, the applicant must address all fire issues _/_/_ SC-06-01 9 ~'~ I~ Protect No DRC2001-00262 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• Y. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices Z. Windows 1 All sltdtng glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner -~-~- -~-~- / / LJ sc-os-o~ ~o ~) ~- `~~ 3'x 5 z '. S P-eus en Slock wall .vlLh 8' ca^ ~ 1, ~ 4`/a11 ;o na+e s~LCCO Snish anC connect 'o Necd entry gates r ;5 1 - -y _ T'f-fil~~nfuldiPii', nn~^m:..~uYllY~i ~ ~.~ ~ „f+~~--~ -- __-~u~~l~~~ vmynh°"04;~~i',yal"~~U-~ i~„~ Ilj~~"lim-~ TI"PICAL DECORATIVE MASONRY SIDE YARD ~~'ALLS ~4 4 -. ~ ~~ 1 , ~t ~[ ++ nj~~•{jY+'x ~ y M i . ~ h ~ ~~~ z i~`i. ~ ' `'°' ""~' 'gym a ~ KTGY GROUP 1~v ~ ty `Yi'} fi~pap! ! ;` RCNIT[CTY[[ IL.xMMIMO If[[1 YITCX[LL •OYTM IIIY IM[ CFLIIO[MIA [ielt ~ j` ~Q .miry i" rl „ ta.n •eo-vea rnx Iwl set me[ O IN[ .LLl W11[ 11tltllYd TYPICAL STUCCO COLOR SAMPLE ~ TC~'r /J A R Ranch o Diversified Pacific Development Group L L C 10631 Crvi<Cmar Dnve~ Stood Floor Pncho CucwonB~ Celifowa 911]0 (909)481 1150 KTCS7`NO 2001009 ® R C R E S Cu ca mo nga Cal i f ~Trn ~ ~~ 2pp1.Oo2Co 2 '~~V~R-SIFIEU ~I FAG T o r n i a ~~, KTGY GROUP._H~ Mey I5, 2001 __._ 1 •- Dlvetstfied Pac2fic Development Group L L C 10621 Civic Cm4r Dnvq Scrnvd Flaor Rmcho CucemaoSe, Celdami9 91910 (909)491-1ISo ELEVATION 'A' SPANISH PLAN 1 ~.c~c~'1T~UJ I~1'11.1.-- ~ ~ try 1 w~ ~ ~N ~/ ~ • CONCEPTUAL FRONT ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a Key Notes: O Low Profile Concrete's' Tilc Roaf C Flat Concrete Tile Roof O Ltght Lace Stucco Ftmsh ® Sand Finish Smcco over Foam Tnm O Decorative Tile Vents © Metal Sectio¢a] Garage Door O (Glazing Optional) Funed Out Stucco Base ® Wood Fasna O 2" Deep Smcco Recess 10 Optional Stone Venett 11 Opnonal Bnck Venett 12 Wood Shutters 13 Hazdb¢azd Siding 14 4z4 Wood Outlookers 15 6'-0" tall Pnvacy Wall 16 Wood Potshelf 17 Wood Railing 1$ Opt~omal Wood Deck 19 Window at Bedroom Opnon 2~ 8x8 Wood Post & Tnm 21 Smcco Fmish Column KTGY GROUP, ~~ A1.1 KTGY NO 2001 009 May I5, 2001 ~~~~yy,,~~ ELEVATION 'B' ~~~ rr TRADITIONAL 35'-0" ii III I ~` ~ l ~~ / \ I i ' I Mba i t III V ~ ~ ~ I Master Bdrm ~~_ . /~ `' J III 120 la A - i l i ~ ~ v I cl~ ~~J e_I~ _'~ ~I I I ' III ~~ mcdla 1 Fjamily / RRetreat 1 0 ~ ~- J ~k~ ~ I lox to rrto~a<°~ - i 9'-0'°ig - I- I ~ > , ~ I\~ I ( ~~I Ba_th2 ---~ ~/ ~>,_ a,. ~u~ 1i~ ~, Kitchen it ~ o, 9 0' clg I I ~ ~ `~ ~ Bdtm 1_ Noo~C~ +ai••x' ~ ~j~~~,l I ,'ox~,e Il4xl 6 ~ ~~ rtfn 1 O ~~_ -_ - °'~~ r ' ; ; Flex - 's,oti~ 11- ~ ~ aun ~~ (_ Dmmg_I Ir _l, _': v ~~~ 9'-U`tl8 'i~i~ _ I ~ I i Lrvmg I Is-d x 19 _ _ 9'-4-cle li _~ I Garage r-1 ~-~ I I I I .; ol~~ I I Mba ~ I dg I ~~ ~ Master Bdrm ~ ~ ~ ` ` 13x la'a ~ ~' I II 1 ~ i \ I I I, Retreat ~ lox to Irtcn 90'dg ` I ~ opl cl°rd I Bath 2 p 90-c1& - 9N~E~d~`~~Yy. ~ - ~', Opt Retreat ~ I ~(~~) ~~ ..f ~~) I ~ I ~~~ ~~ I_~l ~Il~- _ /~ \ ~ Laun Yr°- °Ig i i I / Chvty~ I - Opt Den - 107 s f Dlvcrsdicd Paafic CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 1 - 1, 6 5 9 S F- - 1, 7 6 6 S F Development Group L L C 10631 Ci°,° ~ml° n°.S ~°C Flwe A R B O R C R E S T Rv¢ha Cmw°n6a Cahf°wa 91]30 (909) 4 g1 1150 Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r m a KTGY NO 200t 009 I(1 Il-~ I ~ I ~~~~ I ; I ~_' _ - J to x log r o^ dg ~_ Garage Opt Bedroom 4 - 107 s F ~~~ KTGY GROUP, ~~ a ,~, ~.°s :~., .~. ,a... ..m..m A1.2 May I5, 200t ~~ a= ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~5~ ~8~~~ ~~~ z 0 H w a w H w w .a 0 H w a w x 0 H w w w x w a Q.`~~~~ o- ;~~ ~ ;~ c~: - ~~~-- Y: __•_u ~jQ~ =I M r-i o ~ H o ~ ~ ~ .~ w w '" .~ w U ~~ o ~U~ x ~ w ~ o H ~ w ~ `~ U ~ U ~ ~., o z ~ .a ~ a ~ J Gm w^~ o° a°n~ w°s~~ vC7 f wua~ > o s~ QyV~ ~~9u Q ~a s oa 0 0 Z r V ROOF PLAN 1/9" = 1 0" REAR ELEVATION PLAN 1 - B A R Ranch o -- MUU,IONS ~o F~ f`i~YlLt~ ad ~F--L l~Y WiNSnWs ~hlD A1.L Wlrlix~y.~s ~T ~ V~~~ i`C~JM ~ ~u~u~ vl~l . (s~-bwhl L~s}~~ t ~~ 5 '~. SID '~{i~ ~"I.G1~ of u~m~ -tt~. uaE ~ - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S B O R C R E S T Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION GROUP. ~~~ A1.4 KTGY NO 2001009 May I5, 2001 Ml16UC~lS ~ ~ ~giNl1~ C~1 ~c1.L Y-EY ~ir~~as ~No &u.. yua~voy.ts Tt-~ET ~ ~tshal_~. Ftvr~- ~ -j~,~c ~ ~skioWN L~51~D~ LEFT ELEVATION ROOF PLAN va- = 1 0- 1 U D '1g{MS ~~ ~7-YE ~45~. L E u~-I-lK~1~l @~ t~~ ~1-~A"Cloi~l . - 1--- J- ---- -~.~ Diversified Pacific Development Group L L C 10621 Cmc Comic Dmq Secwd Floor Ravcho LLumon6a Ghfa.aa 9 VJO (909)481-1150 KTGY NO 2001 009 ~~ iii ~ ~ ti ~IOiw~ REAR ELEVATION I ----- ~- ----~. I'tL--- IP l~S. ~, ~~~, ~--_ PLAN 1 C - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a RIGHT ELEVATION ~/~C~ KTGY GROUP, ~~ A1.5 May I5, 2001 IDverslfied Pacific Development Group L L C loev c,.~o cm~ m,.~, s~ooa Floc. Rvvc6o Cuwvavge, Gldvmw 919)0 (909)481 1150 ROOF PLAN 1/8^ = 1 0" • µUw~aJs Zo ~ ~-~n ay ~x ~iu~wl~ ~~~ ~ W.wrb ~~,~ .n~v~1, ~~W~ ~~~. ,~. PLAN 1 - D EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a LEFT ELEVATION KTGY GROUP, ~~~ ~ o.: ~. A1.6 KTGY NO 2001 009 May I5, 2001 REAR ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION s N ~i~.~~ Key Notes: t Drvers]fied Pac]fic Development Group L L C 10621 Gnc Caiu Dnrc~ Scvvd flror Rmc6o Cucamooge, CdJaaa 911]0 (909)4A1-1150 KTGY NO 2001 009 ELEVATION 'A' CPANTCH PLAN 2 - CONCEPTUAL FRONT ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a O Law Profile Concrete's' Tilc Roof Flat Concrete Tile Roof O Ltght Lace Stucco Fmish ® Sand Fmish Stucco over Foam True O Decoratlve Tde Vents © Metal Sectional Gamge Door O (Glazing Optional) Furred Out Smcco Base ® Wood Fazc1a O 2"Deep Smcco Recess 10 Optional Stone Veneer 11 Optional Bnck Vrneer 12 Wood Shutters 13 Hardboard Stdmg 14 4x4 Wood Oudookers 1$ 6'-0" tall Pnvacy Wall 16 Wood POtshelf 17 Wood Railing 1$ Opnornal Wood Deck 19 Window at Bedroom Optlon 20 8x8 Wood Post & Tnm 21 Smcco Fmish Column ~d KTGY GROUP, ~~~ e~~:.. .u' .u .KM..e~m A2.1 May I5, 2001 ~cL.~- ~.+~-Jr 'TWO`S "T~bkT ~~ INE Off. M t VL ~ ~d ~/~. , ~.~cLl. '~ ~4fz '~CKS f~OJ1GEp ~cS ~T~LD1~{~, I I dax,m, I I PoR~ opc up 4 Opt Bedroom 4 u-e dg opev m xmv I I ~'°= I I Mba Opt. Retreat I I L - _ - opc deck 4'~~kt, ~~ ', drtx,wg ~ Mba ~ ~ '~ I I~ I I ~he,&~ f~-- 9 I opL pepo I I I -~-~ I I ~ '_~`~ L ~-+i _ ~. I LDlnln to=u I ~ Family ~ ~so•dg I I 1"~I~c ~~ II II ~--- ~~ ~~ ~ _ /r~.~m-Ti t~ '.~ i -~ III ! i tL ~ ~% - - Loft / Bdrm-4 I - - ~~ /Retreat it I n-' to=lo 9--0•,a -~ I O ~ I ~ ~ %vmg ~ ~O I I ~:-a.~ - ~i o 2~.~-~,~-d~~ III ^ Ill Bdrm 9'-0' dg Second Floor Plan I~ _ _ '~~=~1 Area 1149sf I ~_ ______ -=zJ oror uvda door v bed opc i i _ _ 0-- porch u elewoom 'A•,'B a C Frrst Floor Plan Area 913 s f Pdr I a Flex a ~, Ltvmg Il-2x 10.8 vol clg ~ j doaret bed opc Garage - I I ` ' -~ II ~ II ~ ~_----- _J• Dlverslfied PaclSc CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 2 2, 0 6 2 S. F - 2, 2 l 0 S. F Development Group L L C '~~'°~~e~~~K,g~Fl~r A R B O R C R E S T ~~ C(909) 49t-11 Oforae 9 V30 Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a KTGY NO 2001 009 Porch at elevarion'D' KTGY GROUP, ~~~ ee:.: :gee .~. sewn acorns A2.2 May I5, 2001 Opt Bedroom 5 - 148 s f - ~/IULUD~IS ~ i~ g'~vw~ ul 7ki.~ Y k-iNPOWS }~st~ID Act,L WiNOOWs '[t-tai ~. u~s~4~ F~r'1 ~tt~ wu DAS1~"D~ . --- , Q ~ a '~ -, « 512 III -- ~f TYP ~~ i L___ I I ~ i I_ V ~~a ~J ROOF PLAN I/9^ = 10" I ', A_ ~~ I, C.1vCJ l~ry'LW~1N~ ~ ~ ~~N#~rJ~~~NTa iu.i~ ~7t~ l l • ~; Diversified Pacific Development Group L L C loazl o~~ cm~ a,~ sewoa Fiver Rm<hv Cucamvvgg; Cdifvwa 90]0 (909)A81-1150 KTGY NO 2001 009 REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION - ~Y~ ~~ I ,~ PLAN 2 - A - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE I/4" = 1' 0" KTGY GROUP ~~ , I ~ ~1 :c =,,, .,..w~, e~r A2.3 May I5, 2001 " f''luU,lOrIS To ~£ ~1l-~ GN JN.L KE'-' yJIN]by~iS ~,rlD Aru. VJINlbY,1S ~tAT ~ ~isA~E ~M ~{E 6~IG ~llE-~l / C~rbWIJr p~,s1tE.V~, ~~ ~ 6 ~i ~2i'" N r x4 _ Drverslficd Pacific Development Group L L C 10621 Cmc Cmw rmvq Sccood Floor R,vcho CLwvov6v Ghfowv9l]l0 (909)691-1150 KTGY NO 2001 009 1 1 ROOF PLAN r; 1. a 1, ui ii~-~-~r-t- ~j7~1 ~"I~dUi ~UN~- J THE LEFT ELEVATION 2.x ~Z ~.1J-YI~tJD - ~L~lc.~-r'~N'T +--- r REAR ELEVATION PLAN 2 - A R Ranch o ~~Nf I T L NATION D~ tkJi-~ "ii{E E~tzTr' LINE l'~~ B - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ~j ~ KTGY GROUP, ~~~ ~ C Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a A2.4 May I5, 2001 MU~~-als -ro F~ Pty-a~r-~ a-~l ~--t- ~Y (nUI~WWs ~EhID J~L.L ~nL1NCbW5 Tt-t~T ,~r/ ~rts~.e~..E r-ra~r1 ~t-rE BLIL ~lIEW ~Sk-~o1~lU DX.SHED~ Drvcrsified Pacific Development Group L L C ioczl c~~~ Cm~ o~K, suwa rl~. Rmcho CUOmou6a Gldomu 91)JO (909J 491-1150 I I 15 L-r I ~ ~ ~~mrn 18 uuuiiui ii --,--- 512 I I TYP I I L___ I I I I I_ I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ LZ_- i I I ~ ~ ^r ~ a } ~ `_ ---- ~ 9,..-~ m~-.erg. 1/R" . ,~ ROOF PLA U~~ ~~~ I iIVJN~k1S '['fF~S ~,~ND Y p~-r~-~--~ NN~ 2.x 12 p~.LY~r-D ELEVATION KTGY NO 2001 009 LEFT ELEVATION I _ .~ _ _ _ ~ 5kttd.l. ~X't~lb ~4 M REAR ELEVATION ~ ~t_oU ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~£ I aR. u~ru. "~ ~' u~ PLAN 2 C - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a KTGY GROUP, ~~~ 6~we. ~~~~ m nc~m nemwm A2.5 May I5, 2001 - Mu~uous -w ~. vi C(.~ ~ WinlDOl~1s ~~W~NCbWs T 14C~.~rtsx~. ~i'l TNT e~.~c Vii-kl, ~~rowr~ ~. -- I II I I 4 I I I I I ~ I I II I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ~ 511 I II I I I I TYP l I I L___ I I U I I I I I I I I a ~ _ ---- I ROOF PLAN IH LEFT ELEVATION 2x12 ~16+X~ Dtverstfied Pacific Development Group L L C IR~ilucho ~CLUmmon~DCeli(rn~e 91 JOc (909)481-1150 KTGY NO 2001 009 ----- ~ii' ~---Irl - D I~J~ ~~~I REAR ELEVATION 54~ ~ :~ ~~ '~ .ny ~ u~r~ ~ ~ P L A N 2- D - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a ELEVATION A2.6 May I5, 2001 Q ~ KTGY GROUP, ~~~ --Nate e~Fb ~o ~.c~~L ~i.~.usas ~~u. ~v i~~ Sk~r~ihl Its f-~D~ Key Notes: C C c r Drverstfied Pamfic Development Group L L C 10611 Cmc Cato arv5 Scmvd Flwr Rmcho Cucemoege, CWfavu 91]JO (909)<91-1150 KTGY NO 2001009 ELEVATION 'A' SPANTSH C !` N ~o v . N ELEVATION 'B' TRADITIONAL ELEVATION 'D' CRAFTSMAN PLAN 3 - CONCEPTUAL FRONT ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a O Low Profile Concrete's' Tde Roof O Flat Concrete Tde Roof Light Lace Smcw Funsh ® Sand Fmish SNCCO over Foam Tnm O Decorauve Tde Vents Metal Scchonal Gazagc Door O7 (Glaung Optional) Furred Out Smcco Base ® Wood Fascle 2" Deep Stucco Recess 10 Ophooal Stone Veneer 11 Optional Bnck Venxr 12 Woad Shutters 13 Hazdbaard Sldmg 14 4x4 Wood Outlookers 15 6'-0" tall Pnvecy Wall 16 Wood Potshelf 17 Wood Rmhng 1$ Ophmnal Wood Deck 19 Wmdow at Bedroom Opuon 2~ Bz8 Wood Post & Tnm 21 Stucco Fmtsh Column ~~~~ KTGY GROUP, ~~~ A3.1 May I5, 2001 -mss `T#~.T ~ ~'~~,LtN~ G~ Mtwt~l ~4V~', . ~~ °~l-tE, 1~~ p~ ID~V ~ ~tN~D~~. o I ~~w9o I I ter.-~~~.. ~ ~ Noo' ----tt r--;~ 96x1] 0' clg -~ ~ Family ~ .d-lox 1¢g IC>.tche -9~0'21g ,ff-0'Ne woh by ~' ~$ penM ~t ~ Pdi ~~ Dining ~i 9~ :m~ mdR.wt, ~ i~i ~~ it doom bed opt. ~1 ~ I L1v1IIQ V3~x31 oL-d ~~nt~l Garage opt. uodcr mbmn Wane 'Ill ~ rtfa ~ ' II L~ JT__J L °O I I I ~----L-- Flex Porch at elev 'B' b---~ ~ porth m dr. J A' & C Flrst Floor Plan Area 1001 s f Drverstfied Pacific CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 3 - 2, 2 5 4 S. F. - 2, 4 0 3 S. F Development Group L L C ~08I1 °~a Cam Dmc, Seeood Floor A R B O R C R E S T Rmcho Cucemoeg; Cildomie 91010 (909)061-I 150 Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a KTGY NO 2001 009 Q\ ~ KTGY GROUP, ~~ A3.2 May I5, 2001 Second Floor Plan I I Area 1254sf ~_~-- --_--_-_-,_~ ~Y~ ,~~~f.,.,.f, ., - ,-,o ~ . Opt Bedroom 4 Porch at elev 'D' Drverslfied Pacific Development Group L L C 1o5z1 c~~~ cmuT a,K, suom Fl~~ Rmcho Clramou Gl~fomu 91'1]0 (9U9J 481 1150 KTGY NO 2001009 Y-~T WINDOy.IS AND hLL Wl~ll ~-l~J4T ~ ~ she ~t1 '[HE ~U~t,lc, `lIEY~I, ROOF PLAN 1/b" = 1 0" 1~ ~ ~IS~ ~E1LIf~ I 11ddQ ~JDcI.CoNItS ~4LONG~q l.lrl£ ~ 1"1N,l.IK-E~I~Tl-1E REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION F3 ~? -------- - -~tJ~----~~'-------- ~h PLAN 3 - A - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a RIGHT ELEVATION • ~Or~- - - - - Wlr~c~W-S ~~~, KTGY GROUPw ~~ i ~~ ~ ~~.:...,,, • ~ .LL.~~,~,~ A3.3 May I5, 2001 Q ~7 ; ~ 513 ~ r TYP ~ J ~ - I _ _, n __~_ 1___Ll_J ~b I ~_____.1/_____~ ROOF PLAN va^ = 1 0^ ~u~ ~~ ~ur~ ~~- LEFT ELEVATION IGED Cpl ~L'L >~ G.uN~kts FRot~t ~ w~l ;" v. Dlvefslfied Pacific Development Group L L C 10631 pnc Cmlc Dnvq Savod Flaor Revchv Ceumavge, Ghforae 91]10 (909)<81-1150 KTGY NO 2001009 F~ttl,~uaras -~ ~ P ~£Y -nt1~DaWs1 ASV SAT ~ vts,~~. ~,~Ic vt~ ~~ ~ '1j~aMS, ~ll~S ~I.OI~IC~J~L1T~ REAR ELEVATION PLAN 3 - B A R Ranch o ~~ ~~ u~~ii ~~ ~ L~ ~J I/~1N~lS -- ~ . ~~tV~LI~ gC16'N,J> ~c ~~~~y ~ t~ ~~ ~ ~GHT ELEVATION aR- u~1'nt, ~ Y UNE ~N +~ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS KTGY GROUP, ~H~ B O R C R E S T ~ j .::., ,,,, ~~ eu u ,~ u,~ ~ c Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a A3.4 May 15, 2001 ~- -• _Mut,u.oNS ~ ~. ft~nv~ ay Stu. ~ ~u~>rasl ~~ ~ vu-~ws '[ter ~ ~l~sx~ ~lzon ~ IvIY. V~l~// ~/ I~ i i ~ I i 1 ' ~ 15 1 I i ' ~ 1~ ~i v i 1~~ ' 'i 18 ~ I 'll i ~ 512 ~ ~ TYP I I I ~ I ~ I I i I I i _ - I _ - L___ I ~ I -----~~-----~ ~. "gy'm' _.. ~ ROOF PLAN I/B^ = 1' 0' UI'C'F~A=n -~r~s, CL.c.al~ES 1'~a~lC~ Sr~UNE Mlu-~r~N-~ -~1'}~ ~c~ Zi~1. ~-~ LEFT ELEVATION ~i i ~ ; - •_ - -~ L - -- -! ~ _ - Y - ~ ---- - -~ - - i ~~-------- ~ ~~ 1 1 ~ I ~~j IL I I~ i I ~ I~/ I ~ ~~s REAR ELEVATION v~'~'~~~~` M~µ' GHT ELEVATION ~,- ~tllN1'l ~,~ ~Jt,E CJF 'I~~ ~' ~ err ~ '" "''Y Drversl£ed Pacific PLAN 3 - C - EXTERIOR ELEVATION S Development Group L L C ~ `~ KTGY GROUP, 10631 Cihc Cmv Dnvc~ Saavd flmr ~ • • ' " i. c Pmcho Cwamo gq GLfom~9g30 A R B O R C R E S T (909)491 II50 ~ tai.:: '~" .u nmun u.wm Rancho Cucamonga, California A3.5 KTGY NO 2001 009 May I5, 2001 - MU~~lo~15 ZO f~ fl~llG~A GN X~,i_ KEY W~n~ma-vs ~ ~.~ Wi~1S ~~T ~J~~s~~ f~tx~t TH'~ ~~~ ~~~ `~!!. ~~~. T CCT CT L`t)ATT/11•T ~/{1~ ry [~ l•{N~11, 1~• ~ LINE ~4Q~' , Dlverslfied Pacific PLAN 3 - D EXTERIOR ELEVATION S Development Group L L C ~ , KTGY GROUP, ~ : a RmcL° Cuomo GIJ za• 91110 zm 1p6210i °~~ ~ °° ~°~~~~ A R B O R C R E S T ~ j ,.. °~ (909) < 1-1150 ~ c • +u nim.rs uarnvm Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a A3.6 KTGY NO 2001 009 May I5, 2001 ROOF PLAN 1/8" = 1 0" ~~~/ tom' >~l. ~~ ll-~ d1.~$ - ~~ Leac~•'[toN Irlt--l.. 6E °''~ IN~Cxw~U WN~'~ 51~~ ~ I°-cQ~ „ Kev Notes: Dtverstfied Pacific ~ - r Development Group L L C 10621 Cmc Cmier Dnvq Saovd Floor Rmchv Cucamovg~, CsLfomie 91]30 (909)<81 II50 KTGY NO 2001 009 ELEVATION 'A' SPANISH Y L A 1V ELEVATION 'B' 4 - ~.~ iV ~.>GPTUAL FRONT ELEVATIONS A R B O R C R E S T Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a O Low Profile Concrctc'S' Tde Roof O Flat Concrete The Roof O Llght Lace Stucco Flmsh ® Send Fmish Stucco over Foam Tnm O Decorauve Tde VrnLs © Metal Scchona] Gamge Door O (Glazing Opuoaal) Furred Out Stucco Baze ® Wood Fazcla O 2" Deep Slucco Recess lU Optional Stoae Veneer 11 Optional Bnck Vrnett 12 Wood Shutters 13 Hazdboard Stdmg 14 4x4 Woad Outlookers 15 6'-0" tall Pnvacy Wall 16 Wood Patshelf 17 Wood Radmg 18 Opnomal Wood Deck 19 Wmdow at Bedroom Option 2U 8x8 Wood Post & Tnm 21 Smcco Fmish Column OC, KTGY GROUP, ~~e A4.1 May I5, 2001 -_ Q---v J ` I I it opL drek I oN-,.oo I -__ i I I ~~ II~~ ~°1~'~~~`~ ~ III i OO~-' ~ ^~CIIII ~ I i ~~~ ~ K-0tchen~ ~ ~ ~- ~ I I Mba, ~pLmdu o f Nook i I i 0 I _ _M_aster Bdrm I I;g hm,~ I U I I I ~ loae Fauuly m6~a 19~ IS-B- - - _ - - Bf~ue 9'-0'dg I I I 10.g~x 16 `\ I ~ 9'-0 clg vol dg ~ V O ~ ~I ~ II I ~ ~ °°°~~"' PL ~~ ~~~ ~ ~-~ 1i~~ ,;. ~coau IW I .y;\ li Bdrm 2 ~ ~m Flex I ^ ~ -- ~ a ~ _+- I ,~~~ I ,~ 1 I I ,'~'~ Laun e~~ Loft / Bdrm 6 U Dmmg u ~ g-0"916 I ~ IJ-IOZ IOfi ~ 1 \ ~ I9-0 cIB--I_ I 9' 'dg Bdrm 3 Bath ,o<, II O9'-0"ulgO 9-0"dg _ ~Lrv g ~~~~~ ~ 1v-10x33 opamEclow -`~]-T~i~l~- ul clg Gazage II B3 34 ~° I III ^ ~[. q-0• clg nt L-~-~._ _ ~ ~ r I I ~ ~ I I I __ i 1 I L ~ ~ ~- - ~6Q A - Second Floor Plan L ~ - ~ ~ First Floor Plan - - - - - - - - Area 1412 s f Area 1153 s f Dlvecslfied Paafic CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 4 - 2, 5 6 5 S. F. 2, 7 4 3 S. F. Development Group L L C 10631 Cme Cmmr Dnvq Semud Floor A R B O R C R E S T 8mcho Cucamonga, Cehfowa 919J0 (909)491 1150 Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a KTGY NO 2001 009 1 1 Tbl}~ at elevation C> /~ KTGY GROUP, ~~ A4.2 May I5, 2001 Opt Bedroom 6 Porch at elevation'B' S V1L.L 6L G1GV0.VVll V ~~ .~ 3 ~~_~ ~~~ -,~c~ ~a ~ ~~~ p°~5~i ~ S 2 ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ t I I I I i ~, ilk ~~i I I ~~III I 4~~II1 I I I I ~ I I w a w H w w E--- _~~ X x ~SSI ~o~ ~~~ ~3 ~~ ~~i Q.. .a a a. - w 0 x ^ I C°°) I I I I I~~I~I I II ~ ~I I I I II ~ ~I I I I a'~~ I I ~~ ~~~ u IF~~•ai I i I I I I ~~ ~ ~~_~__ it i~ I . _ I ~ I_ i . = I I III i ~ I ~- _~___ z 0 H w a w H x x 0 h w w w x w x ~; _e~ M s o ~~ y N , V ~ O e N ~i ~ ~ C7, ~.~ - `1; ^ ?v _ =I ~ `~ .., z ~ o~,~ .. ~, o ~~w ... w W ~ '~ U w ~ ^ ~ ~ ~U~ x ~ w ° H ~ ~ ~ O ~ w U Q ~ U ~. p~ o z~~ Q ~ .a a ~ U gr .1 ~^ Ua ~a k'a~~ ~yah~ w ~ °-r vC7 ~~' ~c5 ~o~~a ca ~ ~a q o~ O N O z r v ROOF PLAN I/8' = 1 0' ULI,IONk~ 'iD ~ ~IIGED ON pcLL WIr1L~ls ~ttp ~EI.1, WINWI^1S THAT ~ YISAg~. ~P,oM TH7/ ft1P~.1G ~ll~, ~~~ ~~~ REAR ELEVATION IZ~cbJJ~ I I ----~I ----- I I 1---`~ "'^ ' ~`~'~' ~~~ ~ 1''U~• ~IGHT ELEVATION o° d1 tH~ s+~ ~ 'ME CR. Url'tlU '[1~ ~=T'c' a -~ . EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS .~ KTG O R C R E S T ~~~~ ' ., ~[D (nltN Wkly LEVATION KTGY NO 2001 009 May I5, 2001 Dlverslfied Pacific P L A N 4- B - Development Group L L C Y GROUP, ~~ L 1062n1 C C Sa,K, 5«ooe fl A R B Ran bo Cucwo a CeLforne9l]J0~ ,a 11 an' a e~u ~e~ (909) 4 1 1150 ~ C ~... .u m~ns•~ .aauvm Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a A4.4 ------- -------- Q I nnn I 512 ~ I TYP I I II 1 I v / pp I 1r----~-~--- ROOF PLAN 1/a' = 10" z 1~LL~'~r1t~ ~- -- MUUn,o-~S TO ~ F~t~p a~ At-~ }~-~' ~xlnafx~Ws JF~ID 4L1. Ir11NL~olrlS T{+pr Ate- Ylsh~>~ Ff~ "f~TE ~ticJ v~~. Csl-ewe aa~v~. I, n/ ~ P ~ i 15 1 ~~~~~~ ~~ y ~ - - - ~~ r LEFT (ELEVATION mm~mrni~ Drvcrstfied Pacific Development Group L L C 10621 Crvlc Cm1c Dnvq Srmvd Floor Rmc6o Cucemon66a CeLfowa 91]JO (909)a91-1150 KTGY NO 2001 009 °° - ~ - - - I ~s~ i ~ , ~~ ~ , ~~!>~ ~ I P gyp- - ii ii ~ I r-i~~ ~~~~ ii ii -• ~_ ii ~ II fT iii iii ii ~~ ~ ~ II f I I ~ ~ •` '~- ~ ~ I i ~i~-I-~ ~ k s~~..~~s i;- 1 ~ ~ r ~ ~_~ REAR ELEVATION `~`~'~' ~~Np ~ M~~Y~HT ELEVATION 5 ~ O« dJ 'f~FE 51 pE G~ TtyE ~l, UlJlll. ZFI~ Fl`( I.It~IE~~N(~ PLAN 4 - C - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS KTGY GROUP, ~~~ A R B O R C R E S T ~~ ~:I..;,•,,,; ~'~ ~ .LL.w „~~ Rancho Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a A4.5 May I5, 2001 - _I- -- - -- - ------ - ~] Diversified Pacific Development Group L L C 10611 Cmc Cam arvq Scavd Floor Racho Cucamonga CeLromie 91]30 (909) 461 1150 ROOF PLAN Muu,IONS 70 ~;E. ~c./~~ Gr! ht.L ~Y WINSbW~ htJP M,.~ W~rt,~iS ~T >~£ YISJtStt ~~ `TttE i~l~uc, Vl~l, ~~WN ~~D~ REAR ELEVATION PLAN 4 - D A R Ranch o «~~LI,Y~D ~l+~dJC~M€TIT ~JI'1D~ ~ ~ SlT1~ ~ ~ BLS ~ u~c-u -tom Yr ~~~, EXTERIOR ELEVATION S B O R C R E S T Cucamonga C a l i f o r n i a u ii .`RIGHT ELEVATION ~~`, KTGY GROUP. ,~ i ~,::.,,, ~ ~ .LL ~~.~~ ~ c A4.6 KTGY NO 2001 009 May I5, 2001 6'-0" SLUMP BLOCK WALL AT SIDE YARDS WITH 3'-0" WOOD ENTRY GATES I~~ 1 1, N e ~+~.``~ ~~41111~1 ~I il~~l ~mi ~~~ uu~~~~ii n ~~!y,~114ii11'4i'~ l TYPICAL DECORATIVE MASONRY SIDE YARD WALLS T H E C I T V O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA SIGLLl ~l l DATE: September 26, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner By. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Very Low and Estate Residential Districts lot basic development standards to facilitate horse keeping. Related file Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00505. BACKGROUND On August 8, 2001, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to initiate this amendment to facilitate horse keeping in the Equestrian Rural Overlay District. The Alta • Loma Riding Club (ALRC) has testified on recent subdivisions to express their concerns that the proposed lots and house plotting may not be conducive to horse keeping. As requested by the Planning Commission, staff has met with the ALRC to discuss their concerns. The ALRC conducted a survey of lots throughout the Equestrian/Rural Area that they believe work well for keeping horses It was concluded that the two most important factors affecting the ability of a property owner to keep horses are the rear yard setback and the lot depth. This is particularly evident in hillside areas where the rear yard typically includes a slope to take up grade between lots ANALYSIS. The City's General Plan designates the area generally north of Route 30 as an Equestrian/Rural area for the expressed purpose of "keeping and protection of animals on private property, including equine, bovine, cleft-hoofed animals, and poultry." To implement this policy, the Etiwanda Specific Plan established an Equestrian/Rural Overlay District and created regulations for keeping animals There are two important requirements for horse keeping 1) A minimum 20,000 square foot lot area, and 2) Horses shall "be kept a minimum distance of 70 feet from any adfacent dwelling, school, hospital, or church located on an adjoining site. The location of corrals, fenced enclosures, barns, stables, or other enclosures used to confine horses shall conform to this requirement. Most of the Equestrian/Rural Area is zoned Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) and Estate Residential (up to 1 dwelling units per acre), which have a 135-foot minimum lot depth and a 30-foot minimum setback (40-foot in Estate Residential) from the rear property line. In recent years, the trend has been larger homes, oftentimes without increasing lot size, hence, forcing horses to be kept in a 30-foot rear yard From a practical standpoint, the 70-foot . separation requirement can result in the only allowable corral/stable location adjoining the ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ESPA DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 2001 Page 2 house The amendment proposes to increase the minimum lot depth to 200 feet and increase the rear yard setback to 60 feet The increase in lot depth is necessary to increase the rear yard setback TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Committee reviewed the proposed amendment on August 8, 2001 and recommended approval. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff reviewed the proposed amendment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated and determined that it is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines, Section 15061. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, with a one eighth page advertisement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation for the adoption of the proposed Ordinance to the City CounGl. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DC mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" -Letter from Alta Loma Riding Club dated July 17, 2001 Exhibit "B" -Illustration Resolution Recommending Approval u • • CITY~RANCHO CUCAM~iuGA JUL 17 2001' n ALTA LOMA RIDING CLUB RECEIVED -PLANNING P.O. Bos 116 Alta Loma, CA 91701 ~J • ruraVequestrian overlay area- ~\ \~ Fxh~b~~- A July 17, 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTN Brad Buller, Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Buller, I am writing you on behalf of the members of the Alta Loma Riding Club. We want to make known our recommendations to change some of the existing rules regarding the development of property wrthin the City of Rancho Cucamonga As you are probably aware, our concerns were raised as a result of several recent developments in the equestrian zoned area of our city. It became apparent to us that the plans proposed by bwlders today have changed. The trend is to bwld larger homes than were traditionally bwlt on half-acre lots, in the past The bwlders have found ways to meet the curtent rules and requirements, without leaving enough space m the rear yards with slopes to comfortably and reasonably house horses As suggested by the Planning Commission, members of our Club met with representatives of your office to review the current rules and requirements We visited existing developed horse properties, with varying degrees of slope, that we felt were well planned and functional We then compared the dimensions of the lots, the homes, equestrian facilities and other featwes of those properties with recently planned and/or developed properties We have identified and request changes on two ewsting rules/requirements The first, is the cwrent mrnimum lot depth of 150 ft We found that minimum depth to be too small, particularly when the property has slopes Our recommendation is to increase the mimmwn depth required to 200 ft This will give homeowners more options when developing properties with slopes, and allow for better functional equestrian use. The second change we request is to increase the existing rear yard setback, of 30 R. We believe that a setback of 60 feet will better meet the needs of homeowners in the We wish to thank Dan Coleman and Larry Henderson, of the planning department, for • their time and work m reviewing these matters. Their knowledge and assistance was instrumental m identifying the above recommendations Most importantly, we want to thank the City for it's responsiveness to the concerns of its citizens and its commitment to the vision of developmem as stated in our general plan. Sincerely, ~pnr(D- carol Douglass, Alta Loma Riding Club, City Liaison P O. Box 116 Alta Loma, CA 91701 ce. Dan Coleman Larry Henderson Vicky Vaughan • L~ ~'~ • Q J a 3 s I~ }- ,~, -..~- ~m r ~~ apse s~ ~+,• o!~* ~---,~ / f" ~~ *~~ •---_~ ~l1 s b RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDINGAPPROVALOF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549, AMENDING LOT BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Spenfic Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng on September 26, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property located within the Very Low Residential Distract and Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, and The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the spenfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polines of the General Plan and wdl provide for development within the distract in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and b This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment, and c The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vinnity, and ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO ESPA DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 2001 Page 2 d The subtect application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code, and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as amended, and the Gudelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment v~nll have a signifipnt effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549 by the adoption of the attached City Counal Ordinance 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES' COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. ~~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549, AMENDING LOT BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTAND ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, PERTAINING TO HORSE KEEPING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549 as described m the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission, after conducting a duly noticed public heanng and concluding said heanng on that date, adopted Resolution No. recommending approval of said application to the City Councl. 3. On the _ day of _2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 4. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Councll dunng the above- referenced public heanng on , 2001, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Councl hereby speafically finds as follows. a. The application applies to property located within the City, and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. c The proposed amendment will further the obfectives of the Equestnan/Rural Overlay District by providing for sufficient lot depth and rear yard setback to accommodate the keeping of horses. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the distract, m a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO ESPA DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 b This amendment does promote the goals and obiectives of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, and c. The proposed amendment will not be detnmental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity, and d The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and e. The proposed amendment is m conformance with the General Plan. 4 This Council hereby finds thatthe project has been prepared and reviewed m compliance with the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendmentwill have a significanteffect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelmes, Section 15061. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Councl hereby approves Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit "A." The Secretary to this Councl shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. i-l ~ XN I~IT u~N Et~wanda Specrrc Plan Part II, Chapter 5 • BASIC DEVEL OPMENT STANDARDS Fig 5-2 ;ER VL ~ L LM 'M LM** Lot Area. minimum average 40,00 25,000 15, 10,000 10,00 6,000 6 (in square feet) minimum ~30,OD0 20,000 10 7,200 2 ~ 5,000 (in square feet) Number ofDU's 140,00 1/20,000 ,%1 1/7,200 !HI 1/5,000 / , (per lot area m square ,Z-m 2 max/lot 4`~ "' 4~n feet) 4 max/lot minimum width • (at regwred front setback) minimum frontage (at front p I ) Setbacks: front side (street) side budding separation • Lot Dimensions minimum depth rear Lot Coverage (maximum %) ~t95`-t ZGO 90' 40' 30' 25' 10/20 60r 25% 100' 60' 40' 25' 25' 0'/15 Total 15' 20' 40% 90' 50' min 50% Of lots - 55' mm 30' 20' avg vary t5' 15' 0•/15 Total 15' 15' mm except where ad/scent 2 stones -20' mm 15' so°i° 5_g 8/96 ~~ T H E C I T V O F R A N G tl O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE September 26, 2001 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Kart A Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH -The development of an 18,260 square foot church with sanctuary and classrooms for Sunday • schobl programs on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 9101 19th Street - APN 202-041-41 Related Files Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00426 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) East - Single-family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) B General Plan Designations North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C Site Characteristics The site is located at the southeast corner of Beryl and 19th Streets The site is generally flat with a slight slope to the south The lot is currently occupied by an existing church/sanctuary The remainder of the site is undeveloped with native trees and grasses present The Alta Loma Channel divides the subtect property, leaving the existing church/sanctuary on the western lot and vacant undeveloped land on the eastern • lot Single-family dwellings surround the property on the north, south, east and west Access to the site will be through existing dnve approaches on Beryl Street (Exhibit "B") ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH September 26, 2001 • Page 2 ANALYSIS A General The project consists of a master plan of 18,260 square feet of building area with sanctuary, storage, office area, and classrooms The buildings will be bwlt on the 5 acres of land Finish materials for the proposed bwiding exterior include stucco texture, trellis and wainscot treatment, and a concrete tde roof (Exhibit "D") The applicant proposes to develop the property in three Phases (Exhibit "C") Phase 1 will consist of the construction of five classrooms and two restrooms for a total of 1,534 square feet Phase 1 is scheduled to be completed in early 2002 Bwiding design approval is only being requested for Phase 1, with the remaining phases being master planned in terms of bwlding, parking, and access locations Phase 2 will include the construction of four classrooms for a total of 4,175 square feet Also, a portion of the existing parking will be replaced with new parking New parking will also be added to the south of the site as well as the initial portion of the courtyard This is due to be completed in early 2005 Phase 3 will include the construction of a 11,560 square foot sanctuary, a 1,000 square foot Boy Scout Clubhouse, the completion of the courtyard, and the addition of the parking lot on the east side of the channel This is set to be completed in early 2008 B Utility Undergrounding The applicant has requested that all utility undergrounding and • street improvements required for the protect be deferred to Phases 2 and 3, respectively (Exhibit "G") This will allow the church time to grow and raise funds for these improvements Planning Commission policy (Resolution 87-96) (Exhibit "H") regwres a project to complete undergrounding requirements prior to occupancy release However, the Planning Commission does have the discretion to waive or defer such regwrements to a later time Staff feels the proposed improvements of Phase 1 will not dramatically impact or intensify the current use of the property and supports the request of the applicant to defer utility and street improvement compliance until Phases 2 and 3 C Design Review Committee The Design Revew Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project at their August 14, 2001, meeting (Exhibit "J"). The Committee recommended approval of the protect provided the applicant screen the proposed faality by adding landscaping at the north end of the property (from the northwest corner to Alta Loma Channel) to screen the existing parking area in Phase 1 D Grading and Technical Committees The Grading and Technical Committees reviewed the protect on August 14, and August 15, 2001, respectively, and recommended approval with conditions E Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on July 11, 2001 Ten people attended the meeting, which included property owners from the surrounding residences to the east of the subtect site The residents asked questions regarding the easterly parking lot (Phase 3) and pedestrian access from that parking lot to the church Pedestrian access will be via the public sidewalk along 19th Street • F Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00426 The proposed master plan will require the removal of 11 mature trees from the site in order to accommodate additional development The master plan includes a landscaperplan showing a number of trees that will replace the C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH • September 26, 2001 Page 3 existing trees The proposed landscape plan wdl provide the types of trees common to development in Rancho Cucamonga and will accent the new bwldings G Environmental Assessment Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study (Exhibit "I") and the Environmental Checklist Staff determined that the protect could have a sigmficant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust, and biological resources because of tree removal Mitigation measures wdl be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality and noise impacts to a less than significant impact, and to replace existing trees common to development in Rancho Cucamonga If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were matled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00082 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad uller City Planner BB KC\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Exhibit "C" -Master Plan/Phasing Plan Exhibit "D" -Elevations Exhibit "E" -Floor Plans Exhibit "F" -Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" -Applicant Full Submittal Letter dated July 27, 2001 Exhibit "H" -Planning Commission Resolution 87-96 Exhibit "I" -Initial Study Parts I and II Exhibit "J" -Design Review Committee Minutes dated August 14, 2001 Resolution of Approval with Conditions for DRC2001-00082 ~3 i --- ----------~----- - ------- ----- --- rte--- ----------- p (under constr LOCATION MAP DRC2001-00082 . I ~~ I 11 I OI -. _ _ _ ~ ! ~r I ; ~~ I ~ I ~ -'OI I - 1- z~- -'- I -~- - ( -i ~ ~~ - I- I. -1 I-i of I 1 ~ __ I ,. L o I- ` -I __ I 1 L AL AEI MA _ __ i - ~ J c _ ` I _r _ __ _~___ - - ._ _ T O '___ ~ '____ _ __ i -- ' - - -- --I - -~--- ~- ~ - j-- I I I ~- ~- - ~- ~---~- -1--~--m~- - ~---`--~-- m -- -- - -I --- ------- ------- -- -- ----------p - - -, -i--I--II i ~` ~ I I-- '-I T-j -~I-r -I---I- --f --~-I ~f- -I- ~ II,I~ I _ iiIII I ,--~- 1 j ~ '--~- - ' -~ -I- --~- ~-- -L.~-L-1-j-- - ' ,_ .~ ' 910 it-`~ ~ j ~7=~ t 1 i~=JIB-r 1 I`` ~IF_~r ~_ { i _ __ .I r _~.L~= _ ~ _ _____ 19TH HIGHLAND- _. --- , m) r I r ~ --r-- , _ I .~IIIII~{I I__ _ , GARDEN _______ ______ _ _ _HU~ic`H -I j j - G --- ' ' t-7 1- ~~ ~1-- 1r------I '' HEATHER r -! I -~--~ i m ~ - ~ $ --~ ~ I ~ ~- --~ ---- r. ~ l -I I I I ,_ 1 1 ,_7 I-- ~- ~- ' ---~ ~ , I I- I -_~~----i - - __W ,d~`rY,+,Tif ..u~p~N-~l4 ys~4 -,v__ -__.~ _ _ I. _ ~ ~ i I z ( ~ _7"a ~l"~c, I , _ I _ _ _ ~ I r--- I HAMILTON _ _ _ D __ _ _r ___ r-~ ~ D I .__ __I-_I - ~- , r- ~ I j ~ (~ I' i' I i ~'~ i~ (1 i %- l i d i i l ~ l i ~ ~'--- -' ~~ ~--- -- ,L_I L_~ I I i ~ II _~ I, ~_i ~_~ ,L ',~^~-' i-' i I I-l ~_,_I ~_~--I ~ ~~--„~1- ~_~-- -~ _ '---~ I ~ I, n i _ ___ _ _~ ! ~ ,p` ~ _ j t_ ,~,} -I ~~ _ I __Im ` __I I I i_.1 I__ _'Z ~` ~ \ I I 1I ~ i I i I I-- I_ I r- i ~ A~! i~ ,~ 1 t i 1 i W _ I_ I I__ __ \ _ _ i _ _ ;_ _ ~ ~ I ~ I - I ~,_ _ PEPPERIDOE I _ ~ ' __i__ _ , I_ _~I I O _r9AGE,_ , WILDR.OW~R ~ ~ I-_ I~~ , r I I, ~, i ~ -; _; ~-_! ,-~I,I f ~ ~ $~ ~_= -• Imo' L-~~ - I i ~ -1_ I ~ ~ .,, I -~ i gLLV _ _ - i I i ~ 1 1 _ ~, ~ '! ~ -~ TRA_VELER~ ~ 1-~•_ __ I i 1 _ I I I ' I _ _ 1 t i~ T ' iPNO~,EPoDODI - _ _ _ _ ! ~ I I ~ " ~i - I 17 I _ - ~_ I ~ ~' ~ - I I ~_ I_1 _ _ i _ _ ~ __I ,~ ,_ __~__ MIGNONETTE- ii 19TH -- ;(iTU is>jvEau 1 yy~~ ,_ r-bi' Ufa 1RDEN I-- 'c_~1-, L7 _ I I ~~~ ~; ' I- ~ -~ -I 19TH i_ I_~ ~I ~I I; _I _i ~ I , -- I .~_~ I III i r ~ ~-I -I -' ' -I -' __ ISMCLORD I -I i ~ -{ --~ -LE -~ 1_=~ _ ,_ ~ ;~ _ _- ~ ~ - - I- ~__ I I I i_.~m~ I ; - F tEDu r I - i I I i F 0 800 1600 2400 3200 Feet Q ~__ _...- m+rc sneEr a ~ ~• ~~ ~- --~ --r - ~ _ 0 6 __ n ___. _ _ _ 4 i4t _ _. _ ' ' i.+ it / / \ I ~ a o ~ ~~\ ' ~' . ~ \ ~~ I I ~ I _ i r 11 ~ I - I _ ,~ L ~ I _ q t II r d a - .,I ~ ~ ~ f~ I 1'~! ~ r O ~ i I I' I ii a ~' I , N I `~ II ~ ® O ~ I P~ ~ I ' I PLGAM AYE O id } yy A &~~C ~~ ~V, iiii ~~ ky ~- ~ CSy ii~' 6e 6f~ ~~ p S ~z i~ ~ 1 O V _ _ op ~' ~ i ~;S ~ t' ~ ~ ~ ' NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH RMIT -- - - ~ ~ g ~ ~ , S - CONDITIONAL USE PE _ _ + ~~ p (DRC2001-00082) c MSS ~ ! 9101 19th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA = - __- _ l l • • ~rc =~E, ° a ~~ _ _~ _'T O i 0 6 ~ P ~- OI O+T - _ 0 I r Yy / ,91 / / ~a , ~ \ \ / ~ I ~ \ \\ ~ \s j ° - ~ » ~ I~ j ~ __ ~ g - I?I I i QQ iFi ' i~ - N '' i~ ~, ; I - ~ ' ~, , _ ~ . . ~ ~ • y '~ J _ I 1 I~ 1 ~ 11 ~ ~' f ® . _ f I , ~ ' P ~ i I / I rtauua~ o ~p ~~ ~~j~ i ' i i~ b g ~ ~ ete e ~ it ~s ~ ~ p ~~ 9 ~~ i ~ O ., - - ~~ a~~ ~ ' ~ f~ ~ ' .~ ~ {tt ~ ~ ~ `- NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT __ , a ~ _ ~ (DRC2001-00082) y 9101 19th Street _ _ na Rancho Cucamonga, CA • '-• r.~..._....__...- ~. ~ - BERtt STREET B O ~_ Y' ~ 0 'T ~ _ 0 ~ f~ Ili ~~ ~~ \ 9p / !x ~~ O \ X I. O ~~ /I ~~ 1 D ~_ s ~~ i e i e ~ ~ r~ D i - ~ i 2 ~ I $$ n1 ~ ~ ~ / i r ~~jr . , i' I ' P- ` Y ~. s ` • y H i' i ~. r fj o ~ ~ m ~ / a P/LGRAM AVE Y ~j 4j ~ ~~l ~~ t~ ° 9 9a a~~ =yt $f ~l ~ P ~; ~~~$I~ i ~1~ " s~ i isii ~~1~i ~ ~~g~~ i~~~ ° ~ 3 ~1 ~~ ~ - - - ' ' " 0 c&E e ~' ' a .'~ ~ a e '' ~ ~ t31 ~ ~ `- NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - -_ a A ~ ~ E (DRC2001-00082) _ 9101 19th Street _'_ ` ~.a Rancho Cucamonga, CA . 1 J J r .__._~..___.~..____~,..- g ~ • C~ L BERYL S~PEET - o. i ~ o _ _ _ . ~ { i H` n g 1- H ~i - \ ~\\ \\ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~\ i , ~ , , o r . I ~ _ ~~ ~ e - ~ P ~ ~~ e ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ' '~ ~ ~ 5 • l i _ ` ~ ~ , ~ ; ~' P ~ J t ~ o ~ ~_ ~ K i I I Y ~ ~ P4CAAM AVE I - *f 11~ i ~ 1 ~1~0 f2 j~1 j2 4 r E pj ! ~ ~ ~ 47~yg~~d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A I ~ 1 A - - - ~ - ! ~ , p of ~ a 1~ 9naEa I 9 qq " Fai9~ iy i~ ~.~~ ~~i~ sy o i ~ 8 8 ' \ ~ Cg i~~z 9~ a' -~ ~ ai yiy ~ ia~Aii~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ p F ~ a rtd 71 5 ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ f ~ 7 6a s `~ ~ ; - o i i S ~ e~° gg g~ '~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NORTHKIRKPRESBYTERIANCHURCH __ n e ~ ~ ~ ~ R CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT _ __ (7 ~ ~~ ~ ~ (DRC2001.00082) Rancho Cuca onget CA __ ___ - =- ^ rn L ~. .. ~. .s,m. ~,~ p..a.. ~~^ WLC a u ^ r e tQi A W 5.°cd a.°o~ 6 . ~ 9d ~ Y ~ d ~ V O ~' f O « 'C i .0 ~ C C Y i C 0 2 U l ~ ICI __ : _ _ .- __ (zaooo-~oozaaaa) il~++Jed esA ~euolilPu09 y~'eBuowean~ oyauea us~dJe~seyy yoJny,7 ue~JeyCgseJd Pa3lufl WI~14i+oN g ~ $ ~ ,*"iz~ ~~~ a z ~.i ° ~ V a a~g a. c $a7 x.,a8 ~ ~~° aaa3e 4 i wr^~_-.ter ... z s s } __ O____~ ~ 1___ { LtI 1 ~~ O i O a - -. I ~ e ; I I I e ~ ~_ 4 J '~ _ I I ~ a ~ $~ O ~~ I pl Y}• I y ~ G G k I O O I I' al" kt I I r=ts- '~'~ r ~1 ~ rr• sa ~` ~ t~ r ~. . I .~ ,I 4~w yT ~ _ _ V r OS ~ ~ ~~ I J ~ ~ `I a d ' ~~ :~;~ I ~ ~ a I 0 ~ 01I~ FI '11 t I I }~ e ~ I`I 1t~1 {~ I ~ O s~ O;~ I ~ si' I J ~ ..~ a 1 i o ~~~m ~{&x~ m~ CECECE WLIJ a o o o ®~ ®~ o ~ e; ~~ ~~ • • ~ l~ _~..~~,_,.,_....,.,---~..~. Vl ~4 ko: B~K;~ FBI ~~~p •° ~~P ~. used ~e~seW • ~ ~ ~z~F -°~ $e~ °= 4~an40 ueual/gsead P87wfl A~~a143~oN a,~ ea eaL ea ~~ ~~ ~~~-- ~ 1 7 ~ 3 ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 7 a e aae a a a as as a y a a a qq g~ f 0 yy1 ~ yy0 aa~ gg1 aa~ gg ,g f 7 7~~ i ~ g i 9 f 9 f 1 t 7 7 a 7 i fp ~l~~8$~gii~#?i~~i ~~ ~i3~~i8 ~~i~~ ~~fe~ i i~~ II~: ~ $® 4 ~' ~ ~; ;~> >;; !!!~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i $a~~~~ i ~ i 9 ~ r`~ ~ W L C A r c h i l e c l s ~;~y,,, lorry Wolff, AIA George M Wiens, AIA Robert) Hensley, AIA lames P DiCamdlo, AIA Robert M Simons, AIA . az~;~ ~ r July 27, 2001 Mr Dan Coleman Pnncipal Planner Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Planntng Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re Condmonal Use Permit Application -Full Submittal Northkirk Presbytenan Church (DRC 2001-00082) Protect No 0012200 03 Dear Mr Coleman We are m receipt of your letter dated July 17, 2001 which informed us that our application for the above protect was deemed complete and accepted for processing Attached please find the items necessary for our full submittal as well as our responses to the Technical Issues and Preliminary Conditions of Approval We look forward to attending the Grading Review, Design Review, and Technical Review Committees on August 14, 2001 and August 15, 2001 Should you requue any further information, please notify me at your earliest convenience With respect to the Technical Issues and Preliminary Conditions of Approval, we offer the following responses 1. Planning Division Design Issues In Phase One of the Master Plan, the Owner agrees to modify the existing building with a plaster wainscot A color different from the stucco above it would be painted below the wainscot See the attached Extenor Elevations sheet The trash enclosure shall be added in Phase Two, therefore, it is included on the Grading Plan, Landscape Plan, Phase Two Site Plan, and Phase Three Site Plan 2. Engineering Division Completeness No responses "G" ~~~ Viraima Dare Tawer • 10470 Foothill Boulevard • Rancho Cucamonoa CaLfornm 91730 375d oh 909 987 0909 fax 909 980 9980 . Mr Dan Coleman Cond~honal Use Permit Application -Full Subrmttal Northlark Presbyterian Church (DRC 2001-00082) Protect No 0012200 03 July 27, 2001 Page 2 b Issues Since the protect will add more than 500 sf, the Owner will comply with the ded~cat~on of the right-of-way and street improvements However, street improvements will not be done until Phases Two and Three have begun Phase Two will include the street improvement along Beryl Street and Phase Three will include the street improvements on 19th Street u Please see the attached drawing showing the ex~stmg overhead utilities m See the attached Civil Grading Plan iv See the attached Cavil Grading Plan c Prehrrunary Conditions of Approval • i The Owner fully understands the condition of approval and intends to comply with this regmrement Since the Owner has a financially humble constituency, the implementation of this condrt~on m Phase One would deplete the construction budget thus not leaving enough money to construct the buildings, which ~s the very reason for this protect With that m mind, we are proposing that the Owner be allowed to defer its compliance with this condrt~on until the phases m which the street improvements will be done The proposal is as follows (1) Since the street improvements along Beryl Street will be performed m Phase Two, we propose to do the under-grounding of the Beryl Street utilities at this rime i~ Our proposal, m response to the m-I~eu fee, ~s sim~laz to the above comment Since the street improvements for 19th Street will not be performed until Phase Three, we propose perrmss~on to defer our payment of the m-lieu fees until that time w We propose to be granted perrmssion to defer our compliance with the street improvement requirements for Beryl Street until Phase Two iv We propose to be granted perrmss~on to defer our compliance with the • street improvements for 19th Street until Phase Three ~ l~ Mr Dan Coleman Conditional Use Pennrt Apphcahon -Full Submittal Northlark Presbytenan Church (DRC 2001-00082) Protect No 0012200 03 July 27, 2001 Page 3 A note will be placed on the Phase Three drawings that a Caltrans permit will be required for any work within the 19th street ngh[-of-way This will be enforced for Phase Three v~ We propose to be granted perrmss~on to defer our payment of the non-refundable deposit for the operation of the street fights until the time at which the street improvements to Beryl Street will be done m Phase Two vu The Owner processed a Qu~tcla~m for excess nght-of-way at Phase Three v~u See Phase One drawing and cavil grading plan • We hope to convey that we aze not asking for any special treatment because the Owner fully agrees with the intent of the requirements and intends to carry them out The Owner ~s merely asking to be given some deferment so that the monies for these improvements can be • accumulated Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (909) 987-0909, extension 2213 Thank you for your consideration Since y, STEVEN A CHAPARRO Protect Manager SAC sd P00 1 2200 1 1-]tr Enc (20) Sets of Development Package Colored Site Plan Colored Landscape Plan Colored Bwldmg Elevations Color and Matenal Sample Board Photographs of the Site cc Dave Bard, President, Northk~rk Presbytenan Church Pastor Richazd A Green, Northk~rk Presby[enan Church Larry Wolff, AIA, Pnncipal, WLC Architects, Inc • ~ l~ • RESOLUTION N0. 87-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION N0. 86-77 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86-77 which was adopted on the 28th day of May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines to order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments, except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles adUacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the pro,7ect side of the street*• a. Said lines shall be under grounded at the developer's expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines on the opposite side of the street from the pr o,7ect: The Developer shall pay a fee to the City for one-ha f the amount per Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with Section above an e e tgi a or reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. . 4. Pole lines contatnin 66KV or lar er electrical lines All lines shall be un ergroun e or in- ieu ees pai in actor ante wit section 1, 2 or 3, above, except for 66 KV or larger elrectrical lines. ~~ N L ~~ H 5. Limits of Responsibilities: • a. In-lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property being developed from property line to property line (the center of ad,7acent streets for corner properties). b. Undergrounding shall include the entire pr o,7ect frontage and extend to: (1) the first existing pole off-site from the pro,7ect boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a pro,7ect boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a pr o,7ect boundary, except at a corner. 6. Fee Amount: The amount for in-lieu fees shall equal the length (per Secti~) times the unit amount as established by the City Council based upon information supplied by the utility companies and as updated periodically as deemed necessary. 7. Exemptions: The following types of pr o,7ects shall be exempt from this po ice- a. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area, parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc. b. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25% of • the floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor's parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less. c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as• reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. d. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUPS. e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility easements with a heavy concentration of services to ad,7acent developments, and the utility lines are 500' or more from the right of way line of a Special Boulevard. g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' off site from both the project boundaries and the ad,7acent property is not likely to contribute to future undergrounding. All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel rights-of-way, etc. • ~ (~0 C~ PLANNING COMhJISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 BY: airman ATTEST: ary • • I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JUNE 1987. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ABSENT: ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS NONE BLAKESLEY ~ ~~ • >' ~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM City or Rancho Cucamonga (Part I -Initial Study) Planning Omsron (909) 477-2750 INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responslbdrty of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time o/ submittal, Crty staff wdl not be available to perform work required to provide missing information Application Number for the pro/ect to which this /orm pertains DRC 2001-00082 Pmlect Northkirk Presbyterian Church -Master Plan • Title Name & Address o/pm/ect Northkirk Presbyterian Church owner(s) 9101 19th Street Rancho Cucamonea, CA 91701-4834 Name & Add2ss o/developer orpro/ect sponsor WLC Architects, Inc. 10470 Foothill Blvd./Tower Suite Rancho Cucamonea, CA 91730 ContactPerson& Steve Chaparro, Pro3ect Manager Address c/o WI,C Architects. Inc. 10470 Foothill Blvd/Tower Suite Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~ ~ u I~ C 1 • Name & Address o(person preparing thrs loan (r/drNerent from above) Steve Chaparro, Project Manager c/o Wi.C Architects, Inc. 10470 Foothill Blvd./Tower Suite Rancho Cucamonea. CA 91730 Telephone Number (909) 987-0909 Information mdreated by asterisk () rs not requrn:d of nonoonstrucbon CUP=s unless otherwise requested by staf/ '1) Pmwde a full scale (8-12 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the pm/ect site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs whrch show mpresentabve wews into the site /mm the north, south, east and west wews into and /rom the site fmm the primary access points whrch serve the site, and representative yews of significant features fmm the site Include a map showing location o/each photograph 3) Pm/ectlocahon(descnbe) At the southeast corner of Beryl Street and 19th Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • 4) Assessor=s Pamel Numbers (attach additional sheet rf necessary) APN No.: 0202-04-41 '5) Gmss Srte Ama (erJsq ft) 5.8 acres 'S) Net Srte Area (total site size minus area o(publ~c streets & proposed dedications) 5.0 acres 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the pm/ect site (attach addrbonat sheet r/necessary Not applicable. • X19 8) Include a descnpt~on of all permits which wdl be necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully implement the pro/ect • Conditional Use Permit, Building Permit, and Grading Permit. 9)Descnbe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the pro/ed including rnformabon on topography, soil stabrtRy, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any exrshng structures on site (inGudmg age and condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs ofsrgn~cantfeatures descnbed In addrbon, site all sources of rn(ormat~on (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, brohc and an:heologrcal surveys, traffic studies) More than half of the site has not been developed. For the most part, the topography is generally flat with a slope to the south. There are a variety of mature trees present. Also, through the middle of the site runs the Alta Loma Channel which cuts the site in half. • 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/orhrstoncal aspects of the site Site all sources ofrnformation (books, published repoRs and oral history) There is nothing known about the cultural or historial aspects of the site. ~~ 11)Descnbe any noise souroes and their levels that now affect the site (airoratt, roadway noise, etc) and how they wdl affect • proposed uses Although the new buildings to be constructed in Phases 1 - 3 are closer to 19th Street, which is the busier street, it will not impact our project significantly. 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnpbon of the site in terms of ultimate use which wdl result from the proposed prolect Indicate rf there are proposed phases /or development, the extent ofdevelopment to occur with each phase, and the anhcipafed completion o/each incroment Attach add~bonal sheet(s) rf necessary Phase One will include the construction of five classrooms and two restrooms for a total of 1,534 square feet. The project is scheduled to be completed in early 2002. Phase Two will include the construction of four classrooms for a total of 4,175 square feet. Also, a portion of the existing parking will be replaced with new parking. New parking will also be added to the south of the site as well as the beginning of a courtyard. This is due to be completed in early 2005. Phase Three • will include the construction of a 11,560 square foot sanctuary 1 000 square foot Boy Scout Clubhouse, the condition of the courtyard and the addition of the parking lot on the east side of the channel. This is set to be completed in early 2008 13)Descnbe fhe surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commeroial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-/amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rnaryard, etc) The surrounding buildings are generall of a residential nature in the form of both one-family and multi-family housing. At full buildout, the buildine setbacks are as follows: Front - 35 feet, rear - 62 feet, west - 34' - 11", and east - 203' - 8". The maximum height on the site is 42' - 6". 14)Wll the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? • The proposed project change will attempt to complement the existing building on the site. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and longterm noise to be generated, rnGud~ng source and amount How wrll these noise levels • a/fect ad/scent properties and on-srte uses What methods of sound proofing are proposed? The only noise that might affect the neighbors might be during the construction of the buildings. Aside from that, there is no foreseeable short-term or long-term noise that would impact the neighborhood. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o/mature orscenrc trees There are some palm and pine trees that would be relocated or replaced to other portions of the site in Phases Two and Three. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludmg domeshc water supplies) into which the srte drams There is the Alta Loma Channel to which the onsite storm drain will tie into. • 18)Ind~cateexpectedamounto/water usage (SeeAttachmentAlorusageeshmates) For furtherGanficahon,pleasecontact the Cucamonga County WaterD~stnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gaUDay) b CommemraUlnd (gaUday/ac) Peak use (ga4mrn/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank X Sewer If sephc tanks am proposed, attach percolation tests 1/ discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed mdreate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For fuRher clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Orstnct at 987- 2591 a Residential (gal/day) b Commeroial/Ind (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number o/ n:s~dent~al units Detached (mdreate range of parcel saes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size N/A C~ • Attached (md~cate whether units are rental or /orsa/e units) N/A 21JAnticipafed range of sale prices and/or rents Sale Price(s) $ N/A to $ N/A Rent (per month) $ N/A to $ N/A 22) Spea/y number of bedrooms by unit type N/A 23J Indicate enhcipated household srze by unit type • 24J Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the protect Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary N/A b Junior High N/A c Senior High N/A COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or inshtuhonal uses This is a church with assembly, offices, and classroom spaces. •26J Total Aoor area of commercial, industrial, ormsbtutronat uses by type Institutional square footage at full buildout G 23,248 square feet. 27)Indicatehoursoloperat~on See attached "Letter of Explanation". • 28) Nu~b~rof Total 6: (1) 40 hours week, (1) 30 hours/week,(( ) 20 hours/week, em to ees 1 10 hours week 1 3 hours/week, 1) six hours/week. MaxrmumShrft Tuesday - Sunday (8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.) T~meolMaxrmumShrft 9 hours. 29)Prowde breakdown of ant~crpatedlob classrficat~ons, rncludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndicabon of the rate ofhrre foreach classrficabon (attach addrbonal sheet r/necessary) Pastor: SS0,000.00/year Rate of hire 0 Clerical: $25,000.00/year Rate of hire = 0 Music: S 6,200.00/year Rate of hire = 0 Youth Director: $15,000.00/year Rate of hire = 0 30) Eshmahon of the number of workers to be hued that currently reside rn the City No new employees are anticipated. • '31)For commen:ral and rndustnal uses only, rndreate the source, type and amount of air pollubon emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Drstnct, at (818J 572-6283) N/A ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, end flood control agenaes serving the project been contacted to determine them ability to provide adequate service to the proposed profect~ liso, please rndreate therrn;sponse No, they have not yet been contacted. ~~ • In the known history o/this property, has then; been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals? 33JExamples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB=s, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground sto2ge of any of the above Please list the matenals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known N/A There has not been any history of use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials. 34J ill the proposed pm/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not I~mited to those examples listed above Il yes, provide an inventory o/all such matenals to be used and proposed method of d~sposa/ The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cat~on plans There is no intention for temporary or long-term use of hazardous and/or toxic materials. • 1 hereby certity that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and in/ormabon requned for adequate evaluation of this pro/act to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and mformat~on presented an; true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief l further understand that addrt~onal information may be required to be submitted be/ore an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date June 6, 2001 Signature Title Protect Manaeer • ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: DRC 2001-00082 2. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00426 3. Description of Project: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH -The development of an 18,260 square foot church with sanctuary and classrooms for Sunday School Programs on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 9101 19th Street - APN 202- 41-41 Construction at the existing church site will take place in three phases Phase I will be completed in early 2002 and will include the construction of a 1,534 square-foot classroom bwlding with five classrooms and two restrooms Phase II with an anticipated completion date of 2005, will include the construction of a 4,175-square foot classroom building with four classrooms Phase II also includes new parking along the south, southeast and southwest portions of the site Phase III will include the construction of an 11,560 square-foot sanctuary, a 1,000 square-foot Boy Scout clubhouse, and parking on the east side of the Alta Loma Storm Drain Channel All phases are anticpated to be • completed by 2008 Proposed buldings will complement the existing sanctuary onsite and will total 23,248 square-feet The proposed buildings will be used to support Sunday school classes, small group meetings, and childcare during services There is no existing or proposed pre-school, childcare or school to be located at the site 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Northkirk Presbyterian Church 9101 19"' Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701-4834 5. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located on the southeast corner of Beryl Avenue and 19'" Street The site is currently developed with a sanctuary, parking and play area The surrounding area is essentially developed with existing single-family residential dwellings across 19`h Street to the north, across Beryl Avenue to the west, and directly behind the property to the south On the southwest corner of 19`" Street and Beryl Avenue is an existing Victorian home, and on the northwest corner is the Community Baptist Church Running southeasterly through the center of the site is the Alta Loma Storm Drain Channel ~~~ • Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kart Coury, Assoaate Planner (909) 477-2750 • ~ ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00082 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, Involving at least one Impact that Is "potentlally Significant Impact," "potentlally Slgnlflcant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages OLand Use and Planning (x) Transportation/Circulation (x) Biological Resources OPublic Sernces ()Population and Housing ()Energy and Mineral Resources ()Utilities and Service Systems (x) Geological Problems ()Hazards (x) Aesthetics (x) Water (x) Noise ()Cultural Resources x Air Quaht O y Mandato Rndin s of S nificance ORecreation DETERMINATION On the bases of this Initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION • will be prepared. Signed ~~t' 1n Sernor Plai August 27, ~~~ ~ • • Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources Slgmpagnl Lass Potentialy Unless Tnan Sigmficanl Mitigation Significant No Im aq In rated Im ad Im acl LAND USEAND PLANNING. Would the proposal a) Conflict with general plan designation or O O O (/) zoning b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or O O O (/) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (/) vicindy~ d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community Comments: a-b) In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, churches are permitted in residential zones with a Conditional Use Permit Various churches have occupied this site since before the City's incorporation In 1984, the City approved Conditional Use Permit No 83-21 fora 1,500 square foot addition to the sanctuary The addition of three classroom buildings, a Boy Scout clubhouse, and appropriate parking will develop Phase I of the master plan for the site In order to better integrate the new buildings with the surroundings, the applicant has proposed colors that will match the existing sanctuary Although the Alta Loma Storm Drain Channel divides the site, continuation of the parking lot east of the channel will visually connect the site The buildings will be sufficiently setback from property Imes and the curb face of Beryl Avenue and 19'h Avenue to eliminate impacts to adjacent properties c-d) Land uses in the surrounding area are designated Low and Medium Residential Distract The Community Baptist Church is located on the northwest corner of Beryl Avenue and 19'" Street, diagonal from the site The project site is an existing use Implementation of the proposed project will build-out the site over a period of five to seven years and will be compatible with existing onsite uses * ~~9 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Potentially Sigmficanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impaq leas Potentially Unless Than sigmfiwnt MNgation Sigmfcant No Im ad Incor mtetl Im d Im ad 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (/) population protections b) Induce substantial growth m an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e g ,through protects m an undeveloped area or extension of major mfrastructure)~ c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housmg~ Comments: a-c) Implementation of the proposed protect wdl not displace existing housing No major infrastructure will be developed that would be considered growth inducing within the community The existing church and parking area encompasses less than fifty percent of the site Implementation of the protect wdl develop the remainder of the site with three classroom bwldmgs, a Boy Scout clubhouse, and additional parking Budd-out of the existing church will have no impact to population and housing Potentially Signdiwnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Leea Potentialy Unless Tnan S~gnifiwnt Mitigation Sigmfipnt No Im d Inca rateE Im ad Im d 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result m or expose people to potential impacts involving a) Fault ruptures () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shakings () () (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including Iiquefaction~ () () () (/) d) Seiche hazards () () () (/) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable () () () (/) soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? () () () (/) h) Expansive sods O O O (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (/) • • ~ ?~ D ~ • Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 Comments: City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault The Red Hdl Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 2 miles south and east of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 miles northerly These faults are both capable of producing 6 0 to 7 0 magnitude earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to 7 5 magnitude earthquakes is approximately 14 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to 8 2 magnitude earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking The site is otherwise located on stable soils Adhenng to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant d) The site is not located near a body of water The Alta Loma Storm Dram Channel, located within the eastern portion of the site, carries water only during heavy storm events e) The site is relatively flat so landsliding or mudflows are not likely to occur • f) The construction of the additional classroom buildings, a Boy Scout clubhouse, and parking will occur on relatively level ground The construction will not result in changes in topography g-i) The proposed protect will not be impacted by expansive sods or subsidence of the land, and will not disturb any unique geologic features Polanhally S,gnificenl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Less Polanhally Unless Than Significant Miligahon S,gn,fwnl No Im act Incur mletl Im h Im acl 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (/) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) of water movements • ai Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00082 Page 7 f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/) through direct adddions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (/) i) Substantial reduction m the amount of O O O (/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) Development of the protect site is expected to result in decreased absorption rates, increased runoff, and drainage pattern changes The existing church occurs on a 5 8-acre site and is less than 50 percent developed Since grading of the site will not exceed 5 acres, the applicant is not regwred to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) As a condition of protect approval however, a drainage study/plan showing how stormwater runoff will be handled, both during construction and operation, must be provided to the City Engineer pnor to issuance of a grading permit Proper grading and drainage control will ensure this potential impact is less than significant The design of the structure will direct surface water run-off to the ex~stmg parking area and existing storm dram outlets b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water f-i) The protect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area PWenlially Sigmlpnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Imvap Ieaa Potentially Unless Tfian Slgmfirant Mi0ga0on Sgnifiwnt No Im acM Incur roletl Im C Im h 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () (/) () ( ) c) Attar air movement, moisture, or temperature, () () () (/) or cause any change m climate d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (/) • • • ~~ Irntial Study for DRC 2001-00082 Comments: City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 a) The proposed protect was screened using Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones 8 Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The criteria pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) When fugitive dust enters the atmosphere, the larger particles of dust quickly fall to the ground The smaller particles, however, may remain suspended for long periods and are referred to as total suspended particulates (TSP) Within TSP are dust particles that are less than ten microns in diameter and which are referred to as PM,o Since PM,o is respirateable and can seriously damage the lungs, fugitive dust is a matter of concern Construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1A, 1 B, 1 C) Default values were used where protect specific information was unavailable The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6'" edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model The default fleet mix was modified to decrease the number of medium to heavy • duty diesel trucks and increase the number of light passenger vehicles, as churches generally do not receive large quantities of heavy-duty trucks At protect bwldout, operational emissions do not exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is innon-attainment status for ozone and PM,o mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contribution to regional emission of criteria pollutants Table 1A URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary For Phase I (Pounds per Day) • Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Gradin 0 83 0 83 12 27 11 66 - - 6 16 2 58 Worker Tri s 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Stations E ui 0 34 0 34 0 27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E w 0 80 0 76 9 65 9 17 - - 0 68 0 65 Arch Coatin s 0 00 0 00 - - - - - - As halt 1 31 1 24 - - - - - - Totals 3 27 3 12 22 20 21 10 0 00 0 00 6 86 3.24 SCAQMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nficance No No No No No No No No ~" 3 3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00082 Page 9 Table 1B URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary For Phase II (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Gradin 2 73 2 73 39 90 37 91 - - 23 97 9 67 Worker Tri s 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Stations E ui 0 34 0 34 0 27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E ui 2 24 2 13 23 68 22 50 - - 1 77 1 68 Arch Coatin s 0 00 0 00 - - - - - - As halt 3 93 3 73 - - - - - - Totals 9 24 8 79 63 86 60 68 0 00 0 00 25 75 11 37 SCAQMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nihcance No No No No No No No No Table 1C URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary For Phase III (Pounds per Da Source ROG NO, CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Gradm 2 61 2 61 34 62 32 89 - - 23 22 8 96 Worker Tri s 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Stations E ui 0 34 0 34 0 27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E ui 2 24 2 13 23 68 22 50 - - 1 77 1 68 Arch Coatin s 0 00 0 00 - - - - - - As halt 5 24 4 98 - - - - - - Totals 10 43 9 92 58 58 55 66 0 00 0 00 25 01 10 66 SCAQMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Sgnificance No No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary For Buildout (2008) (Pounds per Dav) Source ROG NO, CO PM,o Area Source' 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 4 12 5 40 42 57 3 96 Totals 4 12 5 40 42 57 3 96 SCAQMDThres 55 55 550 150 Si rnficance No No No No • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00082 Page 10 • Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds dunng grading activities for PM,o and NOx, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx Tables 1 A, 1 B, 1 C show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented Sensitive receptors in the area include single-family residences surrounding the site Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM~o) wdl be generated However, any impacts to these sensitive receptors from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2. Beryl and 19`" Streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be • applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. b) During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equpment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO, and PM,o levels in the area Table 1 shows a summary of construction emissions with and without mitigation measures The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to sensitive receptors will be at less than significant levels 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed protect is the buildout of an existing church wdl 17,269 square- . feet of additional church facilities, parking and a 1,000 square-foot Boy Scout Clubhouse to be completed 2008 The end use of the protect will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or obtectionable odors 3s Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 PotenLally S~gn~fiwnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impaa leas Potentially Unless Than SiBmfirant MM1igaOOn Sigmfipnt No Im aq Incur rateE Im ci Im aq 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in a) Increased vehicle traps or traffic congesUOn~ O O (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (/) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () () (/) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or () () () (/) bicyclists f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (/) alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rad or air traffic impacts O O O (/) Comments: a) The protect will result in increased vehicle taps compared to the existing 4,979 square-foot church Buildout of the 5 8-acre site will include 18,269 square feet of additional church facilities (including a 1,000 square-foot Boy Scout clubhouse) for a total of 23,248 square-feet of church facilities Buildout of the church will generate 739 30 two-way weekend trips and 9 11 two-way peak hour weekday trips Protected traffic trips were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook The Congestion Management Plan (CMP) has established a threshold of 1,000 two-way peak hour trips Protects exceeding this threshold require a traffic impact analysis (TIA) Based on protected two-way peak hour trips, the proposed protect will not require a TIA Buildout of an existing church site at the southeast corner of Beryl and 19`" Streets will not cause a significant increase in traffic since the church will continued to be traveled to in the same manner The City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation In addition, the protect is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site. Compliance with conditions of approval will ensure that protect-related taps are less than significant • n LJ b-d) The site is a rectangular parcel and currently has two entries along Beryl Street . Proposed improvements will include the elimination of the northernmost driveway along Beryl and the addition of a 30-foot dnveway along 19'" Street The new dnveway will provide access to the parking area east of the Alta Loma ~ 31~ ~J Irntial Study for DRC2001-00082 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 PotenWily Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impaa Less PotenWlly Unless 7tan Signfiont MNgaOOn Significant No I h In tetl I C I cY BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result ~n impacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or () () () (/) their habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated speces (e g ,heritage trees, () Q (/) () eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () () (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ d) Wetland habdat (e g ,marsh, npanan, and O O O (/) vernal pool) Comments: • a,c,d) Proposed church faalities wdl be developed within the site of an existing church The portion of the site intended for the facilities is presently turfed/paved with the exception of the east portion of the site on the east side of the Alta Loma Channel This portion of the site is disturbed and contains non-native weeds and grasses The surrounding area with the exception of the area east of the channel is developed with residential and church uses Therefore, there wdl be no impact to endangered species, or habitats b) The proposed Master Plan will require the removal of a number of mature trees from the site in order to accommodate additional development The Church has applied for a Tree Removal Permit in conjunction with the submittal of the Master Plan The Master Plan includes a landscape plan showing a number of trees that wdl replace the existing trees The proposed landscape plan wdl provide the types of mature trees common to development m Rancho Cucamonga and wdl accent the new bwldings r- 3~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 PolenLally Symfiwnl Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless Than Sigmfiwnl Miligapon S~gnifipnl No Im ci Incur ralee Im ad Im ad 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a-c) Buildout of the existing site will not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans, nor constitute a wasteful or inefficient use of energy According to the California State Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, the site is not within a regionally significant aggregate resource area as shown on Exhibit IV-1 of the Draft General Plan Additionally, the area is developed with existing single-family homes Potentially Sgniftanl Impact Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless roan 9gnificant Mitigaaon Significant No Im atl Inver rated Im ad Im d 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (/) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () ( ) () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () ( ) () (/) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () ( ) () (/) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/) brush, grass, or trees • • n f~.l ~ 3S Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 Comments: City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 a-e) The additional church facilities, clubhouse and parking will not pose a threat to public health and safety with respect to hazardous materials or increased fire hazards Additional parking to occur on the west side of the Alta Loma Channel will remove brush and actually decrease fire hazards for the area surrounded by residential development Potenaalty Sigm6rant ImOad Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless Tnan Sigmfcant MrtiBabon Sigmfcant No Im ad Incur arse Im ap Im as 10. NOISE. Wtll the proposal result m a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () (/) () () Comments: • a) Traffic along 19`" Street and Beryl Avenue are the predominant sources contributing to the ambient noise level in the area Sensitive receptors including surrounding single-family residences will be exposed to elevated noise levels during construction Since the protect is occurring in three phases, only scheduled construction to occur during a particular phase will occur at a given time Therefore elevated noise levels will be short-term and will cease once the construction of that phase is complete There will not be any anticipated traffic noise level increases as a result of buildout of the church b) The proposed protect is the master plan for expansion of a church, including classrooms and a new sanctuary, at the southeast corner of 19i" Street and Beryl Street The City's General Plan EIR indicates that future noise levels exceeding 65DBA from traffic noise from 19'" Street The City of Rancho Cucamonga noise control requirements of an exterior noise level of 60DBA (55DBA at night) and an interior noise level of 45DBA (40DBA at night) Therefore, future traffic noise will exceed City, FHWA and Caltrans noise limits for exterior uses (e g open space/plazas) and for interior uses (sanctuary, classrooms) A noise study prepared by an acoustical engineer will be required prior to issuance of permits to determine appropriate mitigation measures, such as, but not limited to, sound attenuation barriers and special construction techniques The following mitigation measure will ensure noise levels for these units are reduced to acceptable levels 8. An acoustical study shall be prepared prior to issuance of permits to determine appropriate sound attenuation measures to reduce exterior noise levels at or below 60 dBA and interior noise levels to 45dBA. r~ U Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Potentially Sigm(wm Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless Tha S,gmfcant MNgaLOn Significant No Im ad Incur algid Im ct Im d 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result rn a need for new or altered government services ~n any of the following areas a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public facihUes, mcludmg O O O (/) roads? e) Other governmental services () () () (/) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The site is currently served by a fire station located on Amethyst Street, within 0 75 miles east of the prolect site Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect Police Protection -The site is will a developed area that is currently patrolled The 17,269 square feet of additional church facilities, and 1,000 square-foot Boy Scout clubhouse at the existing church site will not increase the need for routine police protection services, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council Schools -Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Proposed church facilities will not result in additional employees Existing and proposed employees at buildout of the facility include a pastor, an administrative assistant, a music director and a youth director No new employees will occur as a result of the proposed prolect However, as part of the City's standard Conditions of Approval, the applicant may be required to pay appropriate school fees or submit a letter of exemption from both the Etiwanda Unified School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District Implementation of this condition of approval will ensure impacts to the local school districts are less than significant Public Facilities -The proposed prolect will buildout an existing church site Traffic currently traveling to the site is expected to continue in the same manner Approximately nine (9) two-way peak hour traffic trips are expected to result from the additional 1,000 square-foot clubhouse Traffic at buildout (2008) is expected to increase to 739 two-way weekend trips from the current (2001) 491 two-way weekend trips Therefore at building the prolect will generate 248 additional trips The City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees will • n LJ 7~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 be used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation Compliance with this condition of approval will ensure that impacts to public facilities are less than significant Potenbalty Signifiwm Impap Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless Tnan Significant M~nganon Sigmfiwnl No Im an Incur rzte0 Im act Im q 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utddies a) Power or natural gasp () ( ) () (/) b) Communication systems O O O (/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () ( ) () (/) faalities~ d) Sewer or septic tanks O O O (/) e) Storm water drainages () ( ) () (/) f) Solid waste disposah O O O (/) g) Local or regional water supplies () ( ) () (/) Comments: a-g) The protect will use existing gas, electrical and communication systems Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. Currently municipal solid waste from the City is taken to San Bernardino, Riverside or Orange County landfills for disposal, depending on the hauler The protect will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the vacant portion of the site Storm drain improvements will be necessary to accommodate the protect This does not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage The impact is not considered significant since it can be mitigated by providing proper stormwater drainage per the City Engineer Pclanlially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PctenUally Unless Tnan S~gnifipm Mnigalion Signifipnl No Im act Inc rateE Im aq Im atl 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (/) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic () () (/) ( ) effect c) Create light or giare~ O O O (/) ~ -~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Comments: a-b) In order to integrate the building to the surroundings, the applicant has proposed colors that will match the existing structure The bwldmg is sufficiently setback from property lines and curb face of 19"' and Beryl Avenues to eliminate impacts to adjacent properties b) The addition of the proposed church facilities, clubhouse and parking will require nighttime outdoor lighting The applicant will be required to submit a lighting plan to ensure there are no impacts to sensitive receptors Polent~alry Signifipnt Impap Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polannally Unless Tnan Sign~firant MNgalwn Significant No Im aG In atetl Im C Im act 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb paleontological resources b) Disturb archaeological resources O O O (/) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () ( ) () (/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change () ( ) () (/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () ( ) () (/) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The proposed church facilities, clubhouse and parking lot are additions to an existing Church site The surrounding area with the exception of church-owned land located immediately east of the Alta Loma Channel, is developed with existing residential and church uses At the time this development occurred, no resources were discovered Grading of the area east of the channel will be minimal and will not disturb archaeological or cultural resources Potentially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supportng Information Sources Potannally umass roan $IgnRlCanl Mnigabon Sgnficant No Im act Incor rateC Im act Im cl 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal C~ a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities () () () (/) ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00082 Page 18 Comments: a) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Proposed church faalities will not result in additional employees Existing and proposed employees at buildout of the facility include a pastor, an administrative assistant, a music director and a youth director No new employees will occur as a result of the proposed protect However, as part of the City's standard Conditions of Approval, the applicant may be regwred to pay appropriate park development fees Implementation of this condition of approval will ensure impacts to recreational facilities are less than significant b) The proposed protect will not affect existing recreational opportunities as the site is located on 19`h Avenue within a developed residential area U Potaneally S~gnllwm ImpaG Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenbally unless Than Signl(wnl MiOgaUOn Sign~fiwnl No Im ad Incor roleE Im q Im C 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. U O O (/) a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () () () (/) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts () () () (/) that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) L ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00082 Page 19 d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or mdirectly~ Comments: a) Proposed church faalities will be developed within the site of an existing church The portion of the site intended for the facilities is presently turfed/paved with the exception of the east portion of the site on the east-side of the Alta Loma Channel This portion of the site is disturbed and contains non-native weeds and grasses The surrounding area with the exception of the area east of the channel is developed with residential and church uses Therefore, there will be no impact to endangered species, or habitats b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality with development of the protect site The short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction activties However, the impacts will cease once construction activities are completed Implementation of mitigation measures presented m this Initial Study and standard Conditions of Approval will reduce short-term impacts to less than significant c) Cumulative effects of the additional 17,269 square-foot church facilities and 1,000 square-foot clubhouse may include increased traffic within the immediate • vicinity However the impacts are not considered significant as the site plan includes set backs to mitigate potential back up into the street, and the applicant will be required to pay appropriate transportation fees established for development within Section 17 30 of the City's Development Code Fees are used to make roadway improvements with the area to keep the arculation system at acceptable levels of service d) The proposed 17,269 square feet of additional church facilities, 1,000 square- foot clubhouse and additional parking is an addition to the Northkirk Presbyterian Church site situated on approximately 5 8-acres The existing church campus consists of a sanctuary of 4,979 square feet with paved parking m the front A loose gravel area east of the paved parking area provides additional parking for the facility Paving of this gravel area will reduce dust emissions and provide appropriate parking spaces for the proposed faalities At buildout the facility will be completely developed with parking, lighting, and landscaping The proposed protect would not result in any significant imapcts to the environment • ~ y~ Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit 00-13 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (r) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft General Plan (June 2001) (r) City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft General Plan EIR (June 2001) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described m this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and that there no required mitigation measures; and this protect will clearly have no si nt environmental effects Signature Date ~ ~ O~ Pnnt Name and Tdle Sf"LVGn R•U+Rh'^'~ ~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 7 10 p m Kart Coury August 14, 2001 GIV VII~VIV IVIGIY If1L IIJJLJJIVILIYI /'91YV VVIYVIIIVIYf1L VJL rLIl1V111 VIIVGVV I-VVVVG - NORTHKIRKPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH -The development of 18,260 square feet of building area with sanctuary, storage, and classrooms of an existing church for Sunday school programs on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre), located at 9101 19th Street - APN. 202-041-41 Related files Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00426. Desion Parameters• The site is located at the southeast corner of Beryl and 19th Streets The site is generally flat with a slight slope to the south. The lot is currently occupied by an existing church/sanctuary at the central west portion of the site The remainder of the site is undeveloped with native trees and grasses present The Alta Loma Channel divides the subtect property, leaving the existing church/sanctuary on the western lot and vacant undeveloped land on the eastern lot Single-family dwellings surround the property on the north, south, east, and west Access to the site will be through existing drive approaches on Beryl Street The protect consists of a master plan of 18,260 square feet of budding area with sanctuary, storage, an office area, and classrooms. The buildings will be built on the 5 acres of land. The bwldings will be self sufficient with independent access, parking, and utility services. Finish materials for the proposed budding exterior include stucco texture, trellis and wainscot treatment, and a concrete tde roof The applicant proposes to develop the property in three Phases The Phase 1 will consist of the • construction of five classrooms and two restrooms for a total of 3,400 square feet The protect is scheduled to be completed in early 2002 Budding design approval is only being requested for Phase I, with the remainder phases only being master planned in terms of budding, parking and access locations Phase 2 will include the construction of four classrooms fora total of 3,300 square feet Also, a portion of the existing parking will be replaced with new parking New parking will also be added to the south of the site as well as the beginning of a courtyard This is due to be completed in early 2005 Phase 3 will include the construction of a 11,560 square foot sanctuary, 1,000 square foot Boy Scout Clubhouse, the completion of the courtyard and the addition of the parking lot on the east side of the channel This is set to be completed in early 2008 Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Incorporate stone treatment (river rock or stacked stone) as accent treatment to base of columns 2 Continue stone treatment around the doorway representation on the northeast elevation 3 Landscape berming, decorative low walls, shrub hedges, or combination thereof, shall be provided to screen parking areas from view of 19th Street. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Rewew Committee approve the protect subtect to the modifications as recommended above. •r~ ~ ~~~ DRC COMMENTS ® CUP DRC2001-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH August 14, 2001 Page 2 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Kirt Coury The Committee directed the applicant to add the following• Provide additional landscaping and trees at the north end of the propertyfrom the northwest comer to the identified Alta Loma Channel to screen the existing parking area in Phase 1. f~ 1 ~. ~ 47 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~ The following Negative Declaration is being circulated /or public review In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Cond~6onal Use Permd DRC2001-00082 Public Review Penod Closes: September 26, 2001 Project Name: Project Applicant: Northlurk Presbytenan Church Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 9101 19th Street - APN 202-0411 Related Fde Tree Removal PermR DRC2001-00426 ProjectDescnpt~on: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITDRC2001-00082 - -The development of an 18,260 square foot church wdh sanctuary and classrooms for Sunday School programs on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling unds per acre) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Intial Study to determine rf the protect may have a signficant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: • ~ The In~hal Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a signficant effect on the environment ® The In~hal Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The projectfile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invked to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. .September 26.2001 Date of Determination Adopted By C ~~ RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00082 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH MASTER PLAN, INCLUDING A 18,260 SQUARE FOOT SANCTUARY, STORAGE, AND CLASSROOMS ON 5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9101 19TH STREETAND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 202-041-41 A Rentals 1 The Northkirk Presbytenan Church filed an application forthe issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00082, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on September 26, 2001, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a) The application applies to the development of 18,260 square feet of budding area with sanctuary, storage, and classrooms of an existing church for Sunday school programs on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct, located at 9101 19th Street, which is presently developed with a sanctuary and parking lot, and contains 11 mature trees, and b) The property to the north, south, east, and west of the subtect site is zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and c) The application contemplates the immediate construction of 3,400 square feet of classroom space on-site and master planned future development of another 14,860 square feet of budding space for use as a sanctuary, classrooms and Boy Scout clubhouse, and d) The applicant is currently using existing fanlities Monday through Fnday for office hours, group worship, and prayer services on Saturday and Sunday r 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC201-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH September 26, 2001 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectrves of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a sigmficant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines • promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Decaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannma Division 1) Light fixtures shall be constructed at a maximum height of 15 feet (to include pedestal) and shall be shielded and directed away from residential areas A detailed lighting plan, including a photometnc S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC201-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH September 26, 2001 ' Page 3 diagram, shall be prepared pnor to issuance of budding permits to provide proper shielding of light sources from adjoining properties 2) Additional landscaping and trees shall be provided at the north end of the property from the northwest comer to the identified Alta Loma Channel to screen the existing parking area in Phase 1, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3) All future budding pads and parking areas shall be seeded and imgated for erosion control Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and imgation plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval pnor to the issuance of budding permits 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance Huth any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Undorm Budding Code, or any other City Ordinances 5) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adtacent businesses or residences, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the City Planner for consideration and possible termination of the use 6) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall regwre rewew and approval by the City Planner, pnor to installation 7) The Master Plan is approved in concept only Future development for each budding proposed in Phases 2 and 3 shall be subtect to separate Development Review process for Planning Commission approval 8) The "Multipurpose Budding" identified in Phase 3 shall not be used for prayer/mass services concurrent with the main sanctuary proposed in Phase 3 9) All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy growing condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming 10) This approval is for the operation of a church and does not include a daycare or private K-12 school 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Engineering Dvision 1) In Phase 2, the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the protect side of Beryl Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side of Beryl Street to the first pole ~ SJ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC201-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH September 26, 2001 Page 4 off-site south of the south project boundary, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Beryl Street shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 2) In Phase 3, an in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommumcationsand electrical) on the opposite side of 19th Street shall be paid to the City pnor to the issuance of budding permits The fee shall beone-half the Gty adopted urnt amount times the length from the centerline of Beryl Street to the east protect boundary (scaled distance from the site plan is 695 feet) 3) In Phase 2, Beryl Street frontage improvements shall be protected in-place and/or constructed per City Standards along the protect frontage including but not limited to, a) Provide street trees as requred b) Provde two (2) 5800 lumen HPSV street lights c) Provide R26 "NO PARKING" signs and stnping as required d) Protect all existing street improvements or replace/repair as required 4) In Phase 3, 19th Street frontage improvements shall be protected in place and/or constructed per City Standards along the protect frontage including but not limited to, a) Provide street trees to comply with the 19th Street beautification Master Plan b) Protect all existing street improvements or replace/repair as required c) Protect R26 "NO PARKING" signs and stnping as required 5) A permit from Caltrans will be required for any work within the 19th Street right-of-way 6) Process gwtclaim of excess right-of-way for Alta Loma Channel 7) Conveyance of site drainage runoff and storm drain connections to the City's flood control channel facility shall be made to the satisfaction of the Budding and Safety Division and the City Engineer during plan check of the precise grading plan ~ 5~ CJ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC201-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH September 26, 2001 Page 5 Envvonmental Mitigation Noise 1) An acoustical study shall be prepared pnor to issuance of permits to determine appropnate sound attenuation measures to reduce extenor noise levels at or below 60 dBA and intenor noise levels to 45 dBA Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~a emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Beryl and 19th Streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy effiGency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance v~nth the manufacturer's specifications 6) The contractor shall utilize electnc or clean attematrve fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut of egwpment when not in use The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman L s3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC201-00082 - NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH September 26, 2001 Page 6 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2001-00082 (Northkirk Presbyterian Church) This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing morntonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation wdl be kept in the protect fde with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be avatlable from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Piamm~g Division • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~~ Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the Clty staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responslble Clty department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action Is required for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact Issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mltlgatlon measures The protect planner Is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP Is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies If compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responslble City department has the authority to • hold Issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or otherforms of guarantee) with the Clty These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mltlgatlon measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I \PLANNINGVCIRT\PLANNING COMMISSIOMDRC2001-00082 MMP DOC S~ ~o • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC 2001-00082 Applicant: Northklrk Presbyterian Church Initial Study Prepared by: Nancy Ferguson Date: August 30 2001 ~ ~ ., •, . . .. . . ys~~ ~'h nt: .:• ~''~'K d>, A r i~~ nk~ .q, ~ ' ~ ms it stabilizing agent) CP C Review of plans A/C . . 5 :e . n A- I p educe PM,a l03 g to a schedule • •• ~ ~> .~~~ .,~,r ,,, ,~,,,,,,~ ~rvgQ enussons assoaated wdh CP C Review of plans A/C p vehicle tracking of soil of(-site Timing may vary depending upon Ume of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such CP C Review of plans A/C g episodes i Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWpCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain CP C Review of plans A/C Z \inactwe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions ) Contractor shall select the wnstruction egwpment based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency All construction CP B/C Review of plans A!C 2 equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's speaficetions Contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered CP B/C equpment where feasible Review of tans P A/C 2 The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP/CE B plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment Review of tans P C 2 when not in use ~ rl v1 Nolse ,, An acoustical study shall be prepared prior to issuance of permits to determine appropriate sound attenuation measwes to reduce CP A Review of report and mitigation C/D Z exterior noise levels at or below 60 dBA and interior noise levels to 45 dBA measures Key to Checklist Abbreviations Resgon~si8le,PersOri ~ ~ ; , -Monitoring Frequency; ~ ~ ~~ ~ Method~of Verifications ~ t,+~~ - tte~-~~~~ ~anctio o s~t~~+ ~ =s ~ ; v CDD -Community Development Director A -With Each New Development , , A - On-site Inspection r w ,,~ ~; ~ a 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -Cary Planner or designee B - Prwr To Construction B -Other Agency Permd /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Budding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports (Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEQAWIMCHKLST WPD (~ W • ~ • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00082 SUBJECT: 18,260 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH, SANCTUARY, AND CLASSROOM EXPANSION APPLICANT: NORTHKIRK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH LOCATION: 9101 19TH STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sale expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such acbon but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Rewew approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code • regulations ~s9 SC-04-01 , Completion Date ~~ ~_~. -~-~- Project No DRC2001-00082 Comolelion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business actmty being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner _ _ • 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / / State Ftre Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits _ _ _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ _ building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ _ time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits Such plan shall Indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and / / the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval pnor to the _ _ _ issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be _/_/~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 11 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing wallsl fences along the protect's perimeter 12 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products 13 The Master Plan is approved In concept only Future development for (each building) shall be _//_ subtect to separate DevelopmenUDesign Review process for Planning Commission approval D. Pa rking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a bwldmg, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _// contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) ~ ~~ SC-04-01 Protect No DRC2001-00082 Comolehon Date 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided • throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaceslplazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office faalities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permds or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municpal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods • 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division • 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Ranch~o-C/u-camonga Municipal Code L' W SC-04-01 3 -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/_/. -/-/- -/-/ Prgect No DRC2001-00082 Comole6on Date F. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require _ _ separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs G. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are requred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of / / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to _ _ _ post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of buddrng permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. • I. General Requirements 1 Submit four complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls _/_/ ~ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/ the City pnor to permit issuance r C ~~ SC-04-01 Proiecl No DRC2001-00082 Completion Date 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_!_ Bulding and Safety Division J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Bulding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commeraal or industrial development or addition _/_/_ to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 4 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/_ counter) K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering _/_/_ • use, area, and fire-resistiveness ' " " 2 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer s high wind instructions _/_/_ 3 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental _/_/_ Health Services prior to issuance of bulding permits 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table _/_I_ 5-A 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A _/_/_ L. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City _/_/_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of bulding permits _/_/_ r~ U ~ ~3 SC-04-01 5 Protect No DRC2001-00082 Comolehon Date 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Ctvtl Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Street Improvements 1 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights / / on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil _ _ _ Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _/_/_ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and / / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _ _ _ d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of • BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/ Standards or as directed by the City Engrneer f Ewsting City roads regwnng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times wdh _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ 2 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program 3 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way 19th / / Street _ _ _ E Co `~ sc-oa-o~ s Protect No DRC2001-00082 Comolehon Date N. Public Maintenance Areas • 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer O. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is requred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them P. General Requirements and Approvals . 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Fire flow requirements for this project shall be 1~ gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 2 Ail required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 3 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 4 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 5 Prior to the issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler sy~ temynderground `D vI SC-04-01 7 -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/-/. / / -/-/- / / / / -/-/- Protect No DRC2001-00082 Comolehon Date 6 Reqwred Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance ~ _/_/ of the building permit • a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reaprocei maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 7 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective _!_!_ pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property these markers are to be maintained to good condition by the property owner R. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire _!_!_ flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be requred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow S. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire _!_!_ sprinkler system 2 All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupanaes with an _!_! occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (FPS), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 3 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire _!_!_ sprinkler system to the Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Ftre Dtstnct permd 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested _!_!_ and accepted by the Fve Dtstnct 5 The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately _!_!_ following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers to Group I Occupanaes, or 100 or mare sprinklers in all other Occupancies T. Fire Access 1 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and _!_!_ obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District to consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when othenvtse required Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 2 The minimum width for a Fire District access road or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum inside turn _/_/ radius is 20 feet The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is ~~ SC-04-01 8 Protect No DRC2001-00082 Comole4on Date 50 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum • width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 3 All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within _/_/_ 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bulding Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior building openings 4 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be _/_/_ submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fve Safety Division for specific details and ordering information 5 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's _/_/_ approval of the construction of any gate across requred Fire District access roadways/driveways 6 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches _/_/_ from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 7 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a _/_/_ minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 8 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from _/_/_ the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fve Distract access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard • 9 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance _/_/_ with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes 10 New bwldings other than dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on _/_/_ contrasting background, wsible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bulding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance U. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit for combustible construction, the builder _/_/_ shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water far fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site V. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever _/_/_ occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the rewew and approval of the Fire Distract Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fve Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal Fire Alarm System 1 An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use _/_/_ or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard r7 LO / SC-04-01 Protect No DRC2001-00082 Completion Date 2 Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit 3 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire District X. Fees 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows *` a $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection b $677 (per new building) for New Commercial and Industrial Development "Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans Y. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a Operate a place of public assembly Z. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards AA. 1 NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at hme of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or mare of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer Other Requirements/Comments NOTE Prior to Planning Dmsion approval the applicant must address all, and resolve all Fire District comments and/or conditions -/-/- / I • -/-/- -/-/- I I -- • / I / / / / C~ ~ l.0 8 SC-04-01 10 • T H E C I T V O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE. September 26, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY: Salvador M Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC. - A request to modify certain sections of the development agreement regarding the timing of construction of specific infrastructure improvements, generally located north of Interstate 210 between Hanley Avenue and Day Creek • Channel -Tentative Tract Maps 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902. A Backoround/Analysis. On August 16, 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and UCP, Inc (owner and developer) entered into a development agreement for the construction and development of a residential development with up to two commercial areas In Apnl 2001, the Development Agreement was assigned from U.C.P. Inc., to Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC As part of the Development Agreement, the developer is required to perform specked infrastructure improvements prior to the issuance of certain building permits However, because of unexpected delays in the preparation of some construction plans, (Street Improvements, Park Plans, Landscaping Plans, Landscape Maintenance Distnct Formation) the improvements will not be completed by the anticipated time frame. The developer, therefore, is requesting to increase the maximum number of building permits issued before completion of the infrastructure improvements. City staff agrees with the developer that the Development Agreement should be modified to increase the number of building permits. The draft, summary modifications are as follows • Page 8, Section 9Ciii -Traffic signal at Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Avenue when warranted or 150 building permits. Traffic signal at Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Avenue shall be installed when warranted or prior to the Issuance of the 250th residential building permit. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 00-02 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC September 26, 2001 Page 2 Page 9, Section Vu -Wilson Avenue open to the public, but not necessanly fully improved, prior to any occupancy Wilson Avenue shall be open to the public, but not necessarily fully improved, prior to the issuance of 250th residential building permit, or when warranted (as determined by the City Engineer). Page 9, Section Cvm -The 100th building permit shall complete Day Creek Boulevard from State Route to Vintage Street Day Creek Boulevard from State Route to Vintage Street shall be complete prior to the issuance of the 200th residential building permit or the finaling of the 100th residential building permit, which ever comes first. Page 10, Section D1a -Banyan Avenue to Rochester Avenue shall be completed by the issuance of the 100th bwlding permit or post a cash deposit or letter of credit in the amount of 200 percent of the value of the completion of the extension of Banyan Avenue Banyan Avenue to Rochester Avenue shall be completed by the issuance of the 200th building permit or post a cash deposit or letter of credit in the amount of 200 percent of the value of the completion of the extension of . Banyan Avenue. Page 10, Section D1b-Day Creek Boulevard shall be substantially complete by the 100th building permit Day Creek Boulevard shall be substantially complete by the issuance of the 200th residential building permit or the finaling of the 100th building permit, which ever comes first. Page 10, Section D2 -The Park shall be substantially complete by the 100th building permit. The Park shall be substantially complete by the 300th building permit. The developer is required to have all homeowners sign an acknowledgment form regarding the park. The form shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer, prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit. Further, City staff recommends and the developer agrees that the following draft, summary language shall be added to the Development Agreement The developer and City staff shall hold regular biweekly meetings. The meetings will allow the developer to keep City staff informed as to the status of development activities in the project. The developer has requested the services of a contract planner to specifically . work on this project. The developer, therefore, is required to deposit a minimum of $100,000.00 per year for a period of two years to fund a minimum ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 00-02 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC September 26, 2001 Page 3 of 1,000 hours per year. The developer shall deposit the amount within ten days from the effective date of the Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02. The final Development Agreement language will be reviewed and approved by the City attorney prior to final action by the City Councl. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: According to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Gwdelmes, the proposed Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 is deemed exempt from further CEQA clearance. This particular section of the CEQA Gwdelmes states, "Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA " It is determined that the Amendment will not result in any potential environmental impact, since no significant biological, geological, or histoncel resources are known to exist on-site. FACTS FOR FINDING The Planning Commission may make the following findings for Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02• A. The intended amendment to the development agreement is compatible with the surrounding development in the area. B An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and Certified by the County Board of Supervisors, and augmented by an addendum prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as legally sufficient for the University Planned Development Protect. Further, according to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Gwdelmes, the proposed Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 is deemed exempt from further CEQA clearance C. The Amendment is in conformance with the goals and objectives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all properly owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 Respectfully submitted, .~ Brad B ler City Planner • Attachments Exhibit "A" - Original Sections to be rewsed for Development Agreement 00.02 Exhibit "B" - Site Map Resolution Recommending Adoption of Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 f.3 wnhm the Project Site and the location of the paseos shall be approved by the CITY's Trails Committee The CITY's Staff accepts eight (g) foot maximum widths for constmchon of the paseos in substantial confornuty with the drawing attached az Exhibits "L" and "L-1" Circulation Issues and Fees Hanson Aeereeates (~) Access The Revised University Protect Entitlements requue char Property Owner provide to the Hanson Aggregates operation located west of the Protect Stte, intenm and permanent access along Banyan Avenue to the Day Creek Boulevard interchange at State Highway Route 30. CITY and Property Owner agree that such access shall be provided in accordance with the Revised University Protect Entitlements and az depicted on Exhibit "M" Furthermore, the Pames agree that the intersection of Banyan Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard will be constmcted m substantial conforrnity to the depiction on Exhibit "M-1" (ii) Disclosure Property Owner agrees to pronde a disclosure stateinent to all purchasers staMg that the Hanson Aggregates operations has tights of access for its truck traffic along Banyan Avenue from the operation to Day Creek Boulevard, and to the interchange at State Highway Route 30 Transportation Fee/traffic Irimacts Analysis Cuculahon improvements necessary to serve the area in and around the Project Site, not cunently within the CITY, are generally depicted on Exhibit `N " The Pames acknowledge that the Property Owner plans to build improvements that exceed the Project Transportation requuementa The CITY agrees to establish a Cuculahon fee for the azea depicted on Exhibit'N" az a mechanism to reimburse the Property Owner for construction of iafrastmctine in excess of Property Owner's fair share The fee shall be calculated on a per-acre • basis, with the cost of the infraswctine allocated to the benefiting propemes Exhibit `N-1"depicts the benefiting properties and then respective fau share Exhibit'N-2" through'N-5" depict the estimated costs of the uifrastructure ExhibII'N-6" depicts the street cross-sections Other Cuculahon Imnrovemrnta The CITY has requested and the Property owner has agreed to make the following changes to the Revised University Project (i) Hanley Avenue shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width, curb to curb, from Banyan Street to the School Distnct's north property line in order to provide left icon pockets and overflow parking for the school az depicted on Exhibit "O" (u) Property Owner shall construct sidewalks on the west side of Hanley Avenue fiom Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue, except for the pomon of fee property depicted as `N.A P " on Exhtbtt "P" As to this pomon, the Parties acknowledge that the School Distnct owns this portion and has ahsady submitted plans to the State of Cahfom~a~iich~ict the construction of a sidewalk on this pomon r.~ ~~ ~__ Y ~ (ni) Traffic signals s~iall be installed on Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue, Banyan Avenue, and Vintage Dnve, the traffic signal at the intersection of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard shall be operational when warranted, or by the issuance ofthe one-hundred and fiftieth (150`q builduig permit, whichever first occurs The other traffic signals shall be installed by the end of the Protect development, or when warranted, whichever fast occurs. _ ,, ~ ~ ~ J~ J ~--'~ "(rv) A raised median shall be provided on Day Creek Boulevard from Wilson Avenue to the Route 30 Freeway. Median island openings shall be allowed on Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue, the . mtersechon located one-half distance between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street, Banyan Street and Vintage Dnve ,rI ' ,I ~~ oMwwm ~ 4:+.00 _ g . (v) Banyan Street from Hanley Avenue to Rochester and Day Creek Boulevard from the Route 30 Freeway to the north protect limit, shall be posted "no parking any time" (vi) Wilson Avenue shall be fully improved by Property Owner from the western boundary of Tract 14494 to th¢ existing terminus of Wilson Avenue located west of Hanley Avenue, except for the north side of Wilson Avenue from Hanley Avenue to the point that is approximately 330' east of Day Creek Boulevard which is the responsibility of Tract 13527, except one lane north of the median shall be installed to allow for traffic nrculahon Wdson Avenue shall be constmcted with 72 feet of paved width, from curb to curb A raised medium shall be constructed on Wtlson Avenue, with median breaks allowed only at Day Creek Boulevard and Hanley Avenue Any other median breaks must be approved by the CITY Engineer . The westerly terrtunus of Wdson Avenue shall include a sortable turn-around area for vehicles _ ~~ -1/ v W(vu) ~rlson Avenue shall~e open to public traffic, but not necessanly fully unproved, pnor to issuance of any cemficate of occupancy r, ~ ,~ ~ _ ~~_ ~/ ~/ vin) Propertyawner shall construct iSay Creek Boulevard from Route 30 to Vintage ~ Avenue, az depicted on Exhtbrt "F", by die issuance of the one-hundreth (100'") bwlduig perrmt, except that the Pames ac}mowledge dus construction cannot be completed wrdtout the cooperation of thud parties who own the propemes on the west side of Day Creek Boulevazd above Route 30 or condemnation of a tight of way along these propemes If, for any reason outside the control of the CITY and die Property Owner, Property Owner cannot timely complete the construction of tlvs pomon of Day Creek Boulevard, then Property Owner shall be entitled to deposit with the CITY a sum of cash or a letter of credit equal to two-hundred percent (200%) of the protected actual costs, affier total or partial, of such constmcaon in full and complete satisfaction of its obligation, and to be relieved of any further resmctions on the issuance of building pemuts If the CITY is requtred to constrict these improvements because of the Property Owner's failure or inability to do so, then Property Owner shall be entided to an accounting for the use of funds by the CITY to complete the construction and to a refund of momes not ed for such construction d Reimbursement to Property Owner from The CTTY's Street Improvement D_ e_ The CITY acknowledges that it has received deposits from other surrounding property owners or protects, including, but not limited to, Centex Homes (Tract 12659, $148,152 40), and Panda Development (Tract 13812, $225,000 00), and may collect other fees for constmetion along Hanleyand/or Wtlson Avenues (Tract 14120) (as more fully deprcted on Exhtbtt "Q") (the Street Improvement Deposits) The CITY agrees that rt will cooperate with Property Owner to requtre such surrounding property owners or protects to complete such Street improvements so that the improvements on Summit Avenue and Hanley Avenue, on Vintage Dnve and on Wilson Avenue are completed at the same tune az Property Owner's adtacent development Alternatively, the CITY will complete the construction of these Street Improvements using the Street Improvement Deposits, or the CTI'Y agrees that Property Owner tray elect to complete construction of all or a pomon of the street improvements, )invited to curb, gutter, street paving and stnping, and street tights and CITY further agrees tt will reunburse Property Owner from the Street Deposits upon the CITY Engineer's acceptance of the Street Improvements and review and of Property Owner's costs of constmcaon, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 10 Storm Drams According to the Revised Umverstty Protect Entitlements, the regional pomon of the Ehwanda/San Sevame drainage fee rs $114,000 00, which Property Owner shall pay to the County, rf requtred. The Property Owner shall also reimburse Kaufman & Broad and The Lyon Company on aper-acre bests for the constmction of storm dram systems in Day Creek Boulevard south of Highland Avenue in the form of payments at the time of the first cert>ficate of occupancy of any umt tnbutary to the storm dram systems The per-acre bests calculation and Property Owner's feu share of the total cost of the construction of the storm dram systems set forth herein is contained in Exhtbrt "R." ~~ D Ttrmne of Develooment and Fees Property Owner agrees to promptly make such improvements for acceptance by the CITY Engineer before the issuance of any building permit for a housing amt over and above one-hundred (100) such amts However, tf, for any reason not within the control of the CITY or the Property Owner, the CITY cannot obtain the Pernuts so that Property Owner can complete the improvements pnor to the issuance of the building perrmt for the one-hundred and first such amt, Property Owner shall be entitled to either deposit with the CITY a sum of cash or a letter of credit equal to two-hundred percent (200%) of the protected actual cost, either total or partial, of the constmchon of the improvements in full and complete satisfaction of iis obligation, and to be relieved of any further restnchons on the issuance of butldmg permits If the CITY is requued to construct these irttprovements because of the Property Owner's failure or arability to do so, then Property Owner shall be entitled to an accounting for the fITY's use of the funds tp complety~the improvements, and to a refund of mRmes not used for such uriprovements Property Owner agrees to construct Day Creek Boulevazd north to Wilson Avenue concurrently with Phase 1 (as defined in the Revised Umverstty Entitlements) and that such nitprovements w,ll be substantially complete no later than issuance of the one-hundredth (100t°) binldtng permit in the Protect The CITY agrees to promptly process all applications and pertniis consistent with its astral and customazy procedures Streetscane_mtprovements from the curb will be constmcted as development of the adjacent tracts occurs 9 ~-,7~ 2 Develonment of the Park Sne Y ~/ Property Owner agrees to construct the Park (as defined in the Revtsed Umveraty Protect Entitlements) at the park site in substantial conformity wtt6 the depiction on Exlubtt "S" and in conformance with ADA standazds, except that the Pames agree that the Pazk will be constructed with up to four (4) ht basketball courts and two (2) Itt ball fields The Pazk ttiiprovemenu will be substantially complete no later than issuance of the ane- hundredth (100ih) building pemut in the Protect The Parties agree that the product specifications for the pazk amemnes aze fisted on Exlubtts "S-1" through "S-2" and that such amemnes shall conform to CTTY standards The quantities and stns of the amemnes and matenals shall be as depicted on Exhtbtt "S-3" and any remaining issues shall conform to CITY standards The CITY agrees to promptly process all applications and permits consistent vnth its usual and customary procedures The CITY agrees that through dedication of 10 acres and construction of the Pazk, Property Owner will exceed, through its constmchon costs, all requirements of the CITY's pazks fees and applicable standazds The CITY waives any requirement for payment of a Pazk fee against the Revtsed Umversity Protect Property Owner shall dedicate the Park to the CITY and the CITY shall accept the dedication promptly upon completion The CITY reserves the tight to name the Park. z 3 Development of Remainder of Protect Stte Neither Property Owner nor CITY can presently predict when or the rate at which phases of the Protect Stte shall be developed, since such decisions depend upon numerous factors which are not within the control of Property Owner including, without limitation, market onentahon and demand, interest rates, absorption, competition, and other factors. The Parties aclmowledge and agree that Property Owner retains flexibility under this Development Agreement to develop the Protect in such order and at such rate and times as are appropnate within the exercise of the Property Owner's business Iudgment The CITY further acknowledges that Property Owner may desue to market, sell, or otheivnse anange for disposition of some or all of the Protect Stte, pnor to development, and that the rate at which the Protect develops will likely depend upon the business Iudgement of subsequent owners of the Project Stte. / _ ~~ ix.Yiom~~~~raao - IO- E s m u m NAP 9umm)t Apnua LEGEND ^ SINGLE FAMILY (7,200 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE) PUBLIC (PARK & ELEM SCHOOL) a COMMERCIAL NAP aY ~~ q ALLARD ENGINEERMG ~~ e ni cnmy'a.n ~. ~~ ~~9 Fonlmn Callamb 02170 (999) 099-1011 i= (1oq 019'9011 RANCHO ETIWANDA ADOPTED UNIVERSITY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT' • RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02,A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC., FOR THE PURPOSE OF MODIFYING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING THE TIMING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SPECIFIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF INTERSTATE 210 BETWEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND WEST OF HANLEYAVENUE -TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 14493 THROUGH 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, AND 15902. A Recitals 1. ~ Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC., filed an application to amend Development Agreement 00-02, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Agreement is referred to as "the application." 2. On August 16, 2000, the City Counnl approved Development Agreement 00-02 . 3 The subtect property of the Development Agreement is legally descnbed herein 4 A true and correct copy of the proposed amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 is attached as Exhibit "A" to the attached draft Ordinance 5. According to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Amendment is deemed exempt from further CEQA clearance. This particular section of the CEQA Guidelines states, "Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA." It is determined that the Amendment to the Development Agreement will not result in any potential environmental impact, since no significant biological, geological, or histoncal resources are known to exist onsite. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 This Commission hereby specifically finds that the proposed Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 and each and every term and provision contained herein conform to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3. This Commission hereby recommends approval of the Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 attached as Exhibit "A" of the attached draft Ordinance. ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DA 00-02 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC September 26, 2001 Page 2 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: LJ f9 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO 00-02, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC , FOR THE PURPOSE OF MODIFYING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING THE TIMING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SPECIFIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF INTERSTATE 210 BETWEEN DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND WEST OF HANLEY AVENUE -TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 14493 THROUGH 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, AND 15902 A Rentals. 1. Califomia Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows• 'The Legislature finds and declares that. a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development protects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. b) Assurance to the applicant for a development protect that upon approval of the protect, the applicant may proceed with the protect in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subtect to conditions of approval, wdl strengthen the public planning process, encourage pnvate partiapation in comprehensive planrnng, and reduce the economic costs of development " 2 California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Any aty . may enter into a Development Agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article " 3. Califomia Govemment Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows. "A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed bwldings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and regwrements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restnctions, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement..." • 4. Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference is proposed Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02. Fio CITY COUNCIL DRAFT ORDINANCE DA 00-02 -RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC Page 2 5 On September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed hearing conceming the Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 and concluded said hearing on that date and recommended approval through adoption of its Resolution No. 6. On , 2001 the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng concerning the Development Agreement 7 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows• SECTION 1 This Council hereby speaficelly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2. According to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02 is deemed exempt from further CEQA clearance This particular section of the CEQA Guidelines states, "Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subtect to CEQA." It is determined that the Amendment will not result in any potential environmental impact, since no significant biological, geological, or histoncel resources are known to exist on-site SECTION 3 Based upon substantial evidence presented dunng the above-referenced public heanng on, , 2001, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Counal hereby speafically finds as follows a) The location, design, and proposed uses set forth in this Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity. b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga SECTION 4 It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice regwre the approval of the Development Agreement. SECTION 5: This Counal hereby approves Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" SECTION 6. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general arculation published in the City of Ontano, California, and arculated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California ~~~ AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02 Page 8, Section 9Cni -Traffic signal at Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Avenue when warranted or 150 building permits. Traffic signal at Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Avenue shall be installed when warranted or prior to the issuance of the 250th residential building permit. Page 9, Section Vn -Wilson Avenue open to the public, but not necessanly fully improved, prior to any occupancy. Wilson Avenue shall be open to the public, but not necessarily fully improved, prior to the issuance of 250th residential building permit, or when warranted (as determined by the City Engineer). Page 9, Section Cvni -The 100th building permit shall complete Day Creek Boulevard from State Route to Vintage Street. Day Creek Boulevard from State Route to Vintage Street shall be complete prior to the issuance of the 200th residential building permit or the finaling of the 100th residential building permit, which ever comes first. Page 10, Section D1a -Banyan Avenue to Rochester Avenue shall be completed by the issuance of the 100th budding permit or post a cash deposit or letter of credit in the amount of 200 percent of the value of the completion of the extension of Banyan Avenue. Banyan Avenue to Rochester Avenue shall be completed by the Issuance of the 200th building permit or post a cash deposit or letter of credit in the amount of 200 percent of the value of the completion of the extension of Banyan Avenue. Page 10, Section D1b-Day Creek Boulevard shall be substantially complete by the 100th budding permit. Day Creek Boulevard shall be substantially complete by the issuance of the 200th residential building permit or the finaling of the 100th building permit, which ever comes first. Page 10, Section D2 -The Park shall be substantially complete by the 100th budding permit The Park shall be substantially complete by the 300th building permit. The developer 1s required to have all homeowners sign an acknowledgment form regarding the park. The form shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer, prior to the issuance of the 1st building permk. Further, City staff recommends and the developer agrees that the following language shall be added to the Development Agreement: ~~~ The developer and City staff shall hold regular biweekly meetings. The meetings will allow the developer to keep City staff informed as to the status of development activities in the project. The developer has requested the services of a contract planner to specifically work on this project. The developer, therefore, is required to deposit a minimum of $100,000.00 per year for a period of two years to fund a minimum of 1,000 hrs per year. The developer shall deposit the amount within ten days from the effective date of the Amendment to Development Agreement 00-02. EXHIBIT "A" ~/~ T H E C I T V O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: September 26, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engmeer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO DRC2001-00534 -CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST - A request to amend the Circulation Element of the Development Code to eliminate a portion of Center Avenue from 6th Street south to Trademark Parkway APN 209-072-06, -11, -16, -17, and -35 RELATED PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Description of Project Environmental Assessment and Development Review 00-41 - A Master Plan Corporate Park -The proposed project is for the construction of a warehouse with 800,370 square feet for warehousing uses and approximately 54,000 square feet for light industrial uses on 40.16 acres of vacant land located on the south side of 6th Street, approximately 490' west of Haven Avenue The proposed warehouse will be used for storage and distribution Site development will occur in one phase Use of the warehouse will be consistent with permitted uses set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 6, General Industrial. The project will require the Amendments to the Development Code, Chapter 17.30 Industrial Area Districts, to eliminate the proposed continuation of Center Avenue from 6th Street south to Trademark Parkway. B Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The 40 16-acre site is located on the south side of 6 Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues. It is bounded on the north and south by vacant lands The site is bordered on the west by Deer Creek Flood Control Channel and on the east by vacant land. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant, and staff completed Part II. Staff identified potential impacts related to traffic congestion A Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) was prepared to determine whether the project would cause increases in vehicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The CMPlTIA concluded that the project would not result in traffic congestion at the study area intersections The mitigation measures for the project require the following improvement If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code Amendment, that the elimination of this portion of Center Avenue is justified, this developer will be required to acquire right-of- TTEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00534 ~ CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 2 way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for Trademark Parkway and the City to vacate a portion of Center Avenue north of Trademark that is no longer needed. ANALYSIS• A Traffic Impact Analysis (dated January 2001) was prepared by Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc to determine potential circulation impacts resulting from the elimination of Center Avenue The analysis considered impacts of the proposed project on existing conditions, as well as on conditions m the year 2020 at the bwld-out of the General Plan circulation system without Center Avenue. The analysis examined evening peak hour levels of service for existing conditions, existing plus project, Year 2020 and Year 2020 plus protect conditions for the following m~ersections• Hermosa Avenue/4th Street, Hermosa Avenue/6th Street, Haven Avenue/4 Street and Haven Avenue/6th Street The Traffic Impact Analysis concluded that the project would not create any significant impacts at any of the previously listed intersections If the City Council determines, through the approval process for said Development Code amendment, that the elimination of this portion of Center Avenue is tustified, this developer will be required to acquire nght-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for Trademark and the City to vacate a portion of Center Avenue north of Trademark that is no longer needed CORRESPONDENCE. This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site A letter was received from Phillip A. Homme, objecting to the elimination of Center Avenue south of 6th Street. The Traffic Engineer has determined after reviewing a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by the applicant, that deleting Center Avenue from the Circulation Plan would not create adverse effects m the vicinity of the site. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of approval with issuance of a mitigated negative declaration All the items, with Planning Commission recommendations, will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00534 CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 3 Respectfully submitted, ~~ Dan Jam Senior Civil Engineer Attachments (Exhibit "A") Figure 17 30.080-H of Development Code (Exhibit "B") Figure 17 30.030-A of Development Code (Exhibit "C") Master Plan Corporate Park (Exhibit "D") Letter from Phillip A. Homme (Exhibit "E") Initial Study Part 1, Part II Resolution G3 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17 30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-H V ~ G=t1ll~LS/~=~1 g«1..a .nqz ewtaiunoN - tm new - lea nD.w ~ N g11 lFSS RA.M 11110 gFA111Cg ~} Effiralg ++t+i PROP04Fg Tf1AGE/IIOIRl1 O O O O .EOFETNaN •~~• l11E ~O IEfan1111L W111L4E _ _ _ _ SPEOLL 41nEF1fiCYEi Wp9C11PMU PgwFn laE/ IiflltT aw.4alpR ~"'~ owzlcs • oulaEls u ,,,~ r-t access Pg.rrs (". ~~a toemun 0 ~~no.o~o tgr.~olatn t ® Bless snlrazl j///~ IWOI INBL~T g191WC7 © -~ ' 0 tanl .00' aaa Nob Penal Mn and b! oonflguradom sn shovm as spProximaflom anty. tTM sibs shown may not a wmnty owned nor b tl1a lontlon sib spscl/ic TM depletion of • sib b an Indbatlon d s Drojscbd futon nand tlmt mry M adjusted owr time u Na Gity develops ~~ PROPeS~.n 7i,Yi}T/ON OF r~R ~~ n~ p ~Xfl/8 ,~ soa8 G'T siss Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17 30 030 ~~ FIGURE 17.30.030-A v - J ~ _N O Y ~ ` (n O Q ` _ ~ N 6 LL m x c7 7 ! O ~ mmmOOn mmma00 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ W tV00~b O • Q m .~ t l~ l/ ~C/¢Igl i 6/99 17 30-9 ~ `~ CABOT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ ~iCv ~XffGaii ~~~~ ~ PARK HPA PHILIP A. HOMME 17925 SKYPARK CIRCLE, SUITE A IRVINE, CA 92614-6319 TEL (949)250-9090 FAX (949)757-9090 Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 CITY OFggN~HO CUCAMONG Sfp A gF~FivFO Ip ~r ~ANNlN6 September 18, 2001 RE Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534 -Cabot Industrial Trust Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission This letter is to express my objection to the Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534 • I obtect to the elimination of Center Avenue between 6m Street and Trademark Street For safety reasons, Center Avenue should go through, so people can go north or south on Center to 4in Street or even Inland Empire Boulevard, to different commeraal centers, without getting on a mayor thoroughfare, such as Haven There are not many streets that go through north/south In this area The Master Plan provided for Center Avenue to continue from 6cn Street to Trademark Street, and the Master Plan should be followed and abided by The developers should be required to dedicate the land for a street and make the improvements from the southern portion of Center Avenue, which is at Trademark and 6m Street The developers of the property to the south were required to dedicate land put a street in 71n Street should have been extended through to Hermosa, but a mistake was made by letting the developer on 71n Street bwld a building too close to the future extension of 71n Street, west from Center Avenue I am writing this letter because I am not able to attend the public hearing on September 26, 2001 Sinc ely, • i i mine PAH Ig max" I Gil ,1 ~, '1 City orRam~o Cucamonga Plamm~p Dnnsion isos> m-rrw ENVIRONMENTAL. INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project'so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d rs the responsibdrty of the applicant to ensure Mat the appl~cafron rs complete at the time o/ submrdal, Cdy stag will not be available to per/orm work required to prowde mrssrng m/ormatron Application Number /or the protect to which this lorrri pertains DR 00.41 Pio/ect Southsbe of 6"' Street between Deer Creek Channel and Haven Avenue rme Name 8 Address o/pro/ed owner(s) Cabot D~stnbufan Center AI, Carrot Industrial Trust Two Center Plaza, SuRe 200 Boston, MA 02108-1908 Name & Address of developerorpro~ect Cabot Industrial Trust and Rrversde Commercial Investors sponsor 3685 Mam Street Riverside, CA 92501 Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foathdl BNd Sude 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1~~J`+Q.3.+a. <-oMMu2chc..ZU~c3~i.0aS - ~arPwu. ~Lt'(~12. Contact Person 6 Address Chuck Buquet /Charles Joseph Associates (909) 481-1822 • 10681 Foothtll Bled Sude 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 r1 U PROJECT INFORMATION 6 DESCRIPTION: , Information rndreated by astensk (') rs not 2qurred of nonoonstrucbon CUPS unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Prowde a full sca/e (5-1/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the proied site, and rnd~cate the sde boundanes 2) Prowde a set of color photographs whrch show repn:sentabve wews into the sde from the noRh, south, east and west; wews into and hom the site hom the pnmary access points whrch serve the site, and rapresentaWe wews ofsrgnficant features from the site Include a map showing /ocabon of each photograph 3) Pro/act Location (descnbe) Southsrde of 6"' Street between Deer Creek Channel and Haven Avenue 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach addrtonal sheet dnecessary) 210-072-05,210-072-11,210-072-16, 210-072-17,210-07235 • '5) Gross Sde Area (ac/sq ft) 5513 Acres 'S) Net Srte Ala (total site size minus area o/public streets 8 proposed dedications) 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change whrch would affect the protect sde (attach addrtonal sheet d necessary None 8)lnclude a description of alI permits whrch will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies m osiertoTully implement the protect Planning Commission Approval Grading Permds and Bur/dmg Penmts 9)Descnbe the physical setting of the site as d exists 6efo2 the pro/ect including information on topography, sotl stabdrty, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing shudun;s on site (including age and condrton) and the use of the structums Attach photographs of signficant features described In addition, site all sources ofinformation (i e, geological and/orhydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, hatiic studies) The entire site is undeveloped except an existing 4,000 squat foot metal building on parce/210-072-17. The Westedy portion of the balance of site APN# 210-072-06 and APN# 210-072-11 am presenfty planted with vineyards f0)Descnbe the known cultural and/orhistoncal aspects of the site Site all sources ofinfonnabon (books, published reports and oral history) There era no known signficant cultural or historical aspects to the site(s) 11)Descnbe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft roadway nose, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses None 12)Descnbe the proposed pro/ect in detail This should provide an adequate descnphon ofthe site in terms of ultimate use which . wtll result from the prosed pro/act Indicate rf them are proposedphases for development, the extent ofdevelopment to occur wrfh each phase, and the anticipated completion o/each increment Attach additional sheet(s) dnecessary The development ohndustna_I bu_ddmgs m accordance wrfh the zomng provided form Sub-area 6 Thrs appl~cahon is for one budding o/ 830, 000 square feet 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cufturel, historical, orscenic aspects Indicate the type o/ land use (rosidenbal, commeroial, etc), intensity o/land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, departmentston;s, etc) and scale ofdevelopment (height frontage, setback, rearyard, etc) North-Interspersed indusfial buildings and undeveloped /and South-lndusfia/ end office buildings EasRlndusfiallots and vacant land West-0eer Creek Channel and undeveloped land (lndusfial building proposed) 14)1h411 the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ect~ No The pro/ect will serve to enhance the surrounding general area G~~ 15)Indicate the type olshort-term and long-term nose fo be generated, mclud~ng source and amount How will these nose levels affect adjacent propeR~es and onarte uses What methods of soundproofing are propased~ Short -Tenn Normal consbucbon noise that null meet applicable standards Long -Term Noise generated WWII be traffic noise as the faaldys intended use rs distnbuhon and will meet all applicable standards '16J Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature orscenrc trees None 17) Indicate any bodies o/water (ncludmg domestic watersupplres) into which the site drams Na None 18)Ind~cateexpectedamountofwaterusage (See AttachmentAforusageeshmates) ForfuRherGanficahon,pleaseoontadfhe Cucamonga County WaterOrstnct at 987-2591 a Res~denhal (gal/day) N/A Peak use (gaUDay) N/A 6 Commen:raUlnd (ga4day/ac) 1500 Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 3000 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Sepbc Tank x Sewer Hsep6c tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests N discharge to a sanitary sewage system ~s proposed indicate expelled darty sewage generation (See AttachmentAlorusageestimates) ForfuRherclanficadon,pleasecontacttheCucamongaCountyWaterDrstndat987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) b Commercralrlnd (ga~day/ac) 2000 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number o/residential unds N/A Detached (md~cate range of parcel srzes, minimum lot sire and maximum lot see N/A Attached (md~cate whetherunrts are rental or forsa/e units) WA • 21)Anhapated range of sale pnces and/orrents WA Sale Pnce(s) S to Rent(permonth) S to 22) Specdy numberof bedrooms by unit type 23J Indicate anhc~pated household srze by and type N/A 24)Ind~cate the expected numberofschool chtld2n who wdl be residing wrthrn the pro/act Contactthe appropnate SchoolDis6tds as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary WA b JumorH~gh N/A c SemorHigh N/A COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and maJorfuncbon(s) of commeroial, mdustnal ormshtubonal uses Commeraal and ldustnal uses as provided form present zoning 26) Total floor area of commerwal, mdustnal, orrnsMubonal uses by type 830,300 square feet I~ 27) Indicate hours of operation To be determined 28) Numberoremployees Total To be determined Maximum Shdt' To be determined Time of Maximum Shdt To 6e determined 29)Prowde breakdown oranbcipated/o6 classificahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an ind~cabon ofthe rate of hire foreach classd~cabon (attach additional sheet d necessary) To be determined 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hued that currently reside in the Cdy To be determined '31)For commerpal and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District at (818) 572283) Business opershons for undetermined user will meet all appl~cab/e standards ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the wafer, sewer, fire, and flood conbol agencies serving the pmlect been contacted to determine theirabildy ro provide adequate service to the proposed pro~ecl~ /iso, p/ease indicate theirresponse Agenaes contacted have indicated their ability to serve the proposed pro/ect ~_~ ~J 1 1 33)In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, bul are not I~mited to PCB, rad~oachve substances, peshcides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground sorage of any ofthe above Please list the matenals and descnbe theiruse, storage, and/ord~scharge on [he property, as well as the dates ofuse, rfknown No 34)VYII the proposed pro/ect mvoNe the temporary orlong-term use, storage ord~scharge ofhazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited ro those examples I~sted above Nyes, provide an inventory of all such matenals ro be used and proposed method of disposal The /ocahon o/such uses, along with the sorage and shipment alas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans No I hereby certify that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and inrormahon required for adequate evaluahon ofthis pro/echo the best ofmyability, that the facts, statements, and inrormahon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and be/ief I further understand that additional inrormahon maybe required ro be submitted before an adequate evaluahon can be made by the C(rty/ofR~anc~~ho Cucamonga Date ~ ~ ~ Signature \ ~~ ~ nee ~~l ~t'+" ~ A G~~ BACKGROUND • City of~ancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File. DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 2. Related Files: Industrial Area Specific Plan, SPA 00-02 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and uevelopment rceview uu-4 i Cabot Distribution Center III -The proposed project is the construction and operation of an approximately 830,300 square foot distribution/warehouse building consisting of approximately 815,900 square feet of warehouse space and 14,400 of related office space. The building will be developed on approximately 40 acres of a 55 13-acre site bounded by Sixth Street on the north, the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel on the west and Haven Avenue on the east, inSub-area 6 of the Industrial Districts (APN 210. 072-06, 210-072-16, 210-072-17, 210-072-35). The southern boundary of the site is adtacent to existing office and industrial/manufacturing uses that front Fourth Street. The proposed protect represents development of approximately 75 percent of the site. The remaining approximately 15 acres, the area fronting Haveri Avenue, is not a part of the proposed protect and no development is currently being proposed. As part of the proposed protect, the applicant has requested the deletion of Center Street, south of Sixth Street, from the Industrial Area. Currently, Center Street extends southerly from Sixth Street through the center of the protect site The City Traffic Engineer will consider this request in contunction with the whole of the protect. Center Street is not a mator roadway and does not currently exist in this location so deletion of the street from the Circulation Plan would not create an adverse affect in the wcmity of the site Center Street was meant to be used as an access between Sixth and Fourth streets With the development of the protect site with one large budding, Center Street wdl not be necessary as an access road since the budding will be accessible directly from Sixth Street 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Darrell Butler Rroerside Commercial Investors 3685 Main Street Rroerside, CA 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park, Industrial District Subarea 6. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is bounded on the north by Sixth Street followed by existing industrial/manufacturing buildings. Haven Avenue borders the site on the east, followed by Haven Building Materials, Inc. To the west is the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel, then Hermosa Street The area between the channel and Hermosa Street is vacant but zoned industrial/manufacturing as part of the Industrial Districts. Existing office complexes and industrial bwldings border the site on the south r~ ~J ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 2 and include the Friendly Hills Medical Group. This area fronts Fourth Street to the south. The surrounding in the vicinity of the protect site are all within the Industnal Distracts area. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kart Coury, Assoaate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: State Water Resources Control Board - General Construction Activities Storm Water Runoff Permit. ~~ I Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one impact that is "potentlally Significant Impact," "potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Slgmficant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Transportahon/Circulation (/) Land Use and Planning ()Public Services O Population and Housing (`~) Biological Resources O UtiOties and Sernce Systems (/) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Aesthetics (/) Water ()Hazards ()Cultural Resources (/) Air Quality (`~) Noise ORecreation (/) Mandatory Findings of Sign~cance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed Na cy Ferg n S for Plann August 31, 2001 Gig 1~~1 Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified Potentially SlgnMCenl Impact Lea Issues and Supporting Information Sources PoleMram unties Than SgndmaM Mitpetlon Significant No Im a Incur atatl Im G Im cl 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? () () () (/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/) policies adopted by agencies with turisdiction over the project c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (/) wcirnty~ d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community Comments: a-d) The site is a former vineyard and the portions of the site are still planted with grape vines The site and vicinity are designated Industrial Park and zoned as Subarea 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Industrial Districts .The designation provides for office development and support administrative services for industrial related activities Currently Subarea 6 allows for light manufacturing, light wholesale, storage and distribution/warehousing. The proposed protect, a distribution/warehouse facility with associated office space falls within the permitted uses for Subarea 6. Polentlelly SlgniAcenl Impact Lea Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentlaly Unless Than $gniflcanl Mitigatbn SlgnlfipM No Im act In tad Im a Im ct 2. POPULA71ONANDHOUSING. Would the proposal• a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (/) population protections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e g ,through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housing? ~Iq Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 5 Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the distribution/warehouse faality may employ an estimated 250 employees including both warehouse and office/clerical positions Employees could work in shifts depending on the ultimate tenant The addition of these employees will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. Rancho Cucamonga and the other aties in the west end of San Bernardino County have long been considered housing-rich as employees in LA and Orange counties moved east and north looking for more affordable housing As lJ~ and Orange counties have become saturated with development, employers are seeking opportunities to locate office and industrial/manufacturing uses in San Bernardino County With development of this and other similar protects, the west end of the County is reaching a balance between fobs and housing thus achieving one of SCAG's major goals for the sub-region c) The western, southern and some eastern portions of the site are presently planted with vineyards (APN 210-072-06 and 210-072-11) Wdh the exception of an existing 4,000 square foot metal budding on the northwest corner of the site (APN 210-072- 17) the site is undeveloped with no existing housing located onsite or within the general vicindy. The proposed protect will not displace housing as the site is zoned Industrial Park and is not proposed for future housing developments. Potanlmlly Signifinanl B3 ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potanilaly u~ ~ in n a Significant Mifigatron Significant fJo Im cl In tetl Im G Im d 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result ~n or expose people to potential impacts ~nvolwng a) Fault rupture? () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shaking? () () (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? () () () (/) d) Seiche hazards () () () (/) e) Landslides or mudflows? () () () (/) ~ Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the land? () () () (/) h) Expansive soils () () () (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features? () () () (/) ~_~ Sao Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 6 Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fautt. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 2 5 miles north and west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 8 miles northwest. The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude (M„,) 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 12 miles northeast of the sde and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is 13 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signfcant d) The site is not located near a body of water e) The site is relatively flat and is located m a developed industrial area adjacent to the Deer Creek Channel, a concrete Imed flood control channel. The site is not susceptible to landslides or mudflows f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the project as the site is currently vacant Grading will be done m accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. The impact is not considered significant as the site is relatively flat with minimal grading requred. • g-h) A Geotechnical Report prepared for the pro/ect site by Earth Consultants, Inc determined that soil types onsite consist of Tu/unga loam across the northern and eastern portions of the site, and soils with characteristics intennediate between those described for Tu~unga loam and Delhi sand are present along the southeastern portion of the site The report did not identify sod profiles with overall characteristics of Delhi soil Soils present onsite are excessively drained, readily level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans. Runoff is very slow, and hazard of erosion is slight The potential for sod erosion and sediment transport to occur during grading and construction can be controlled through implementation of standard Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified m a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that must be prepared by the applicant in order to obtain the necessary permits from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Standard construction BMPs may include but are not limded to 1) spraying the site with water or other palliative periodically throughout the day to control wind erosion, 2) placing sandbags along the downstream side of the sde to prevent sediment transport into the channel; and 3) having sod stabilization sediment control materials on-site during grading and construction to adequately protect sod-disturbed areas before the onset of precipitation These and other measures included m a SWPPP will ensure that erosion and sediment transport will be minimized Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. Q The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. ~, Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 PobMlally SlgNfipnl Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotmiWM Unless Than Significant Mitigatlon SgNficam No Im cl In tact Im Im 4. WATER. Will the proposal result ~n a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (/) waterbody~ e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (/) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments• a) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape proposed on a site currently used for agricultural purposes. All runoff will be conveyed to drainage facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows and must be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Also see Comment 3g-h above for a discussion of erosion and sediment control during construction activities The impacts associated with development of the site are not considered significant after regulatory requirements and conditions of approval the City will impose have been met. b) The western most portion of the site is located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated on Figure III-G/2 "Flood Hazards" in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR. The City has adopted standards for flood protection related to minimum building elevations and flood proofing Drainage and flood protection facilities vnll be provided for the protect to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). • C~ ~~a • Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page S c-e) The pro/ect site is not located near a body of water. The Deer Creek Flood Control Channel borders the site on the west, and contains water intermittently generally during heavy storms The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed both dunng grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied, prior to issuance of a grading permit. f-i) The pro/ect wdl not interfere with groundwater management practices m the area because the site is not used for groundwater recharge. C~ Potentially S~gn~fioanl Impeq Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potagroly unless Tnan Sgmficant Mmgabon Significant No Im xl Incur sled Im Im q 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or pro/ected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () (/) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (/) cause any change in climate d) Create objectionable odors? () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed pro/ect was screened using Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnd, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects The critena pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Two of these, ROG and NO„ are ozone precursers Default values were used where protect specific information was unavailable. Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantrfied to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6"' edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the purely warehouse nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modfied to increase the number of medium to heavy duty diesel trucks G~3 ~: Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 9 • Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmd Md Unmd Md Unmd Met Unmd. Mit. Gradin 3 75 3 75 50 02 47 52 - - 24.64 17 91 Worker Tn s 2 86 2 86 4 05 4 05 7 67 7.67 0 78 0.78 Stations E w 0 34 0 34 0 27 0 27 - - 0.02 0.02 Mobile E ui 8.84 8.84 3 31 3 31 - - 0.45 0 45 Arch Coatin s 57 75 54 86 - - - - - - As halt 2.62 2 49 - - - - - - Totals 79 15 75 79 74 00 70 68 7.67 7 67 30 05 23 11 SCAQMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si mficance Yes No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet. Mit. Unmet Mit. Unmet. Met Unmet. Met Area Source 0 40 0 40 5 54 5 54 2 21 2.20 0.01 0 01 Mobile Source 59.55 59 52 50 73 50.70 394 48 394 20 22.52 22 51 Totals 59 95 59 92 56 27 56 24 396 69 396.40 22 53 22.52 SCAQMDThres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si mficance Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No • During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO, and PM,a levels m the area As shown in Table 1, wdh implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, construction actvities well not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during grading actroities for PM,o and NO,. However, architectural coating (painting) will exceed the SCAQMD threshold for ROGs; without the appropriate mitigation. Generally only the exterior walls of warehouses are painted. Interior walls are constructed of concrete and do not require a protective layer of paint. The URBEMIS7G model calculates total surface area to be painted based on total building square footage. The model does not distinguish surtaces that u+nll not be pamtmg. Therefore ROG emissions estimated from painted activities wdl be significantly less than protected Mitigation measures contained in this section will . ensure impacts are less than sign cant. G~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 10 As shown in Table 2, developed conditions (operational impacts) will exceed SCAQMD thresholds for ROG and NOx by approximately seven percent or four pounds per day Additional mitigation measures to reduce emissions further are as follows. 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3. Haven Avenue and 6~' Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 6. Contractor shall utilize pre-coated natural colored building materials, water-based or low-VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with a high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag or sponge. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 8. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. In addition, emissions over the SCAQMD thresholds for operations can be reduced through rideshanng or use of mass transit, and by offering food service on-site to reduce employee taps The success of the following measures wdl reduce impacts to air quality to less than significant 10. The applicant shall provide incentives to use mass transit and carpools as determined by City staff. 11. The applicant shall designate preferential parking for carpools and vanpools and establish a vanpool system for employees. G ~5 Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 12. The applicant shall incorporate food service into the design of the project to reduce employee trips at lunch time. b-d) There are no sensitive receptors in the area The proposed prolect is the construction of a distribution/warehouse budding on 55 13 acres within Subarea 6, of the Industrial Districts The end use of the proposed prolect, industrial warehouse and distribution, will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors Polmlially Sgn~nl Impaq Lw Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenlially unless man Sgnifirant MibgaOOn Signlficanl No I C In IeE Im Im 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result ~n: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () (/) ( ) nearby uses? d) Insuffiaent parking capaaty on-site or off-site? () () () (/) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? () () () (/) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (/) alternative transportation (e.g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? () () () (/) Comments: a) The Cabot Distribution Center consists of approximately 830,300 square feet of distribution/warehousing, including 14,400 square feet of related office space. Access is proposed via four driveways on Sixth Street Truck ingress-egress would be allowed at the outer two driveways (east and west) with the center two driveways reserved for employee and guest parking so there would be no mixing of passenger vehicles and tractor/trailers. The Traffic Study prepared for the prolect included a larger development area including 54,000 square feet of office space in two additional buildings Since the completion of the study (January 2001) the applicant has decided not to pursue the office buildings and instead propose only the distribution/warehouse building Therefore, the traffic numbers used to evaluate the prolect reflect both uses and will be higher than actual traffic trips generated by the proposed prolect (warehouse only) u LT ti / _ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 12 Under existing traffic conditions, the four study intersections that would be affected by the propose protect are currently operating at Level of Service D (LOS D) or better during both peak hours with the exception of Haven Avenue at Fourth Street which operates at LOS E dunng the afternoon peak hour The Cabot Distribution Center would generate an additional 2,107 daily taps (1,123 passenger taps and 984 truck trips) During the morning peak hours, the protect would generate 87 passenger vehicle trips and 57 truck trips. During afternoon peak hour, the protect would generate 142 trips (116 passenger vehicle taps and 26 truck taps) The traffic study showed that the four study area intersections would continue to operate at LOS D during both peak hours with the addition of protect traffic to existing traffic conditions with the exception of the intersection of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street This intersection would continue to operate at LOS E dunng the afternoon peak hour with the project. The addition of the protect trips to the afternoon peak hour traffic, there would be an increase in delay of traffic of 1 5 seconds This is also true under future year 2020 traffic conditions. The protect site is part of the larger Industnal Districts chapter, of the Development Code The City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of budding permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic arculation. In addition, the protect is regwred to comply with standard conditions of approval for . provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site, employee/visitor parking on-site, and large truck access Compliance with conditions of approval will ensure that protect-related taps are less than sigrnficant A letter from the applicant to the City discussed potential truck traffic noise impacts to the office complex by primary use of Center Street. As part of the proposed protect, the applicant has requested the deletion of Center Street, south Sixth Street from the Industnal Area Currently, Center Street extends southerly from Sixth Street through the center of the protect site The City Traffic Engineer will consider this request in contunction with the whole of the project Center Street is not a mator roadway and does not currently exist in this location so deletion of the street from the Circulation Plan would not create an adverse affect in the vicinity of the site Center Street was meant to be used as an access road to larger Sixth and Fourth streets. With the development of the protect site with one large budding, Center Street will not be necessary as an access road since the bwlding will be accessible directly from Sixth Street. b-d) The site is a rectangular parcel with and four proposed entries along Sixth Street. There are set backs for each entry so visitors to the site will not back up into the street Access for emergency vehicles will be provided by all driveways Sufficient parking (285 passenger vehicle spaces) is provided along the front (Sixth Street) and east side of the building Adequate trader parking is provided on the north and south sides of the bwlding adjacent to the loading docks. ~J ~1 n u Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 ~i City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 e-f) The City has established a series of trails throughout the City along existing streets and through residential neighborhoods There are no trails associated with the prolect site and the Industrial Districts area is not an area conducive to pedestrian use. The proposed prolect will not interfere with local or regional bus service and, although no bicycle racks are proposed as part of the prolect, they could be installed if interest is generated among employees. g) Located two and a half miles from Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft aaenuany sllminnem Impam Lpa Issues and Supporting Information Sources wtem~auy unloas rl,an Slgnifitent Mitipabon $IgnMCant No Im em I atad Im a Im BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result m impacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (/) habitats (including, but not limited to. plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e g ,heritage trees, () () () (/) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () (j (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )7 d) Wetland habitat (e.g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (/) veinal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? () () () (/) Comments: a) The western, southern and some eastern portions of the site are used for cultivating vineyards Based on a map prepared by the U S Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS) the site occurs within an area designated as the Ontario Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (DSF) (Figure 6 of the USFWS Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly). Aside from the vineyard, the site is dominated by non-native plant species A site survey was conducted by Impact Sciences to evaluate potential occurrence of the DSF The report concluded that the subject property does not support characteristics consistent with DSF habitat due in part to the site's historic and ongoing exposure to agricultural activities. Additionally, appropriate soil type and plants are not present onsite and therefore the DSF is not expected to occur onsite. b-c) The site contains trees along the eastern border including eucalyptus and pepper. Appropriate permits must be obtained prior to removal at such time as that portion of the site is proposed for development. Trees proposed for removal will be replaced with appropriate sized trees in accordance with City code. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. ~J r~~ IU Gay Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 14 • e) The site is bordered on the north by Sixth Street and on the east by Haven Avenue. Intermittent industrial development to the south and north and existing agricultural activities that exist onsite has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past Paan6aly S~gnifipnt Impad Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources aaenlufly unless roan Significaa Mingatlon Sgniflcaa N° Im d Incur aleE Im d Im d 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: • a-b) The project will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation c) The protect site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2) An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. vorenuany SlgnMCanl Impaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pclealaly u^'°s° Tnan SlgmbWnt Mitlgalbn SigNMant No Im d Incur led Im d Im d 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () ( ) () (/) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to' oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () ( ) () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () ( ) () (/) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (/) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/) brush, grass, or trees? ~y(~ ~o(- I Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Comments: a/c/d) Based on the existing agricultural use of the site, hazardous materials are not likely present Recent visits to the site did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials A portion of the site along the eastem border is currently used to store farm equipment It is likely that pesticides are currently used onsite, however the site is relatively small 55.13 acres and only a portion of it is used for agricultural activities Therefore the quantity of pesticides being used is small and will dissipate once agricultural activities cease. Section 5 of this Initial Study presents mitigation measures for controlling dust emissions during construction activities These measures will ensure that contact with pesticides, that may potentially be present in sods onsite, is minimized Additional measures are not proposed b) The proposed protect will provide adequate entries to the site, including four driveways, to allow for emergency response assistance and/or evacuation. e) The western, southern and some eastern portions of the site are currently planted with vineyards and the northwest corner of the site includes a 4,000 SF metal budding The existing budding will be demolished in-place in accordance with City standards. The site will be graded and landscaped in accordance with approved plans to minimize potential fire hazards. The protect will not increase fire hazards within the area Potentbfiy slgmncem Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pulentle~ly unlaaa Then significant Millgatlon SIgnlMant No Im d In led Im d I d 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result gyn. a) Increases in existing noise levels O O (/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed protect may produce noticeable project-related noise as the site's proposed construction and end use includes truck traffic. The protect would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area. However, the site is designated Industrial Park Subarea 6 of the Industrial Districts which allows medium industrial, warehousing and distribution as approved by the City on August 16, 2000. Impacts to office complexes south of the protect site will be less than significant • C_1 ~~ r1 LJ Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 PWenlially Sgnificant Impap Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentlalty unless Than Signifipnl Mibgabon SigndKarn No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result rn a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas. a) Fire protection? () () () (/) b) Police protection? O O O (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? () () () (/) e) Other governmental services () () () (/) • Comments• a-e) Fire Protection -The site, located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street in Rancho Cucamonga, is served by a fire station located on the southwest corner of Jersey and Milliken, approximately 3 5 miles from the protect site Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur. Police Protection -Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the distribution/warehouse building will not change current business hours within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled Schools -The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. Parks -Proposed construction activities and warehouse operations will not generate a number of new fobs in the area but will not likely induce people to move to the protect area because of the size of the local labor force that currently commutes out of the area for work Employees will likely be hired from the local labor pool so the protect will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public Facilities -The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities and will be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industnal Districts of the Development Code. G3~ Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Polentally sgrofipnl Impact Less sues and Supporting Information Sources I Pal=naaly unleaa Tlaa s significant Mibgaa"n signifieanl No Im ad Incor ateE Im m Im m 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result to a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following ublibes. a) Power or natural gasp () () () (~) b) Communication systems () () () (~) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (~) facilities d) Sewer or septic tanks? () () () (~) e) Storm water drainage? O O (~) ( ) f) Solid waste disposah O O O (~) g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (~) Comments: a-g) The prolect will use existing gas, electrical and communication systems. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill The prolect will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the currently vacant site Storm drain improvements will be necessary to accommodate the project This does not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage The impact is not considered significant since it can be mitigated by providing proper stormwater drainage per the City Engineer PatarNalh/ 9groficant Impacl Lesa Information Sources ortin and Su I Paantialry unlasa T"a" pp g ssues signifieanl Im d M"igabon In ateA signifldm Im act No Im 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? () () (~) ( ) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? () () () (~) c) Create light or glares O O (`~) ( ) Comments: a) The east portion of the site lies within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Haven Avenue is considered a gateway into Rancho Cucamonga and calls for restnctive development policies, design standards and land use regulations. Haven Avenue as a major travel route for the City, encourages intensive, high quality office and professional development The proposed prolect does not included development of the eastern approximately 25 percent of the prolect site, that area of the site along Haven Avenue ~ ~~ • C~ Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 There will be no vehicular access from Haven Four driveways along Sixth Street will be used to access the site The protect will include a minimum 45-foot wide, seven-foot high landscaped berm setback along Sixth Street which will separate the parking lots from the street b) The proposed protect is located in an area designated Industrial Park and proposed uses will be consistent with the goals and objectives set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Districts The proposed design and exterior elements of the industrial building will be consistent with design standards set forth in the approved plan c) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards The impact is not considered significant 1'-'1 U PMenbely SgnllwaM Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotentlaAy u~~ rn~rin SlgnMCant M~bon Sgnifrcant No Im d In taE Im G Im 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources? () () () (/) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (/) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? () () () (/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (/) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site is approximately 55 13 acres and is east and adjacent to Deer Creek Flood Control Channel The property has been disturbed from existing agriculture use so the likelihood of unearthing cultural resources is minimal and impacts are considered less than significant Potmba0y Sgnificant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pntenbely u~a; T"n,'n Slgn~fioM MNgabon SlgNflcgM No Im q I le0 I a Im 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? O O (/) U O O O (/) G33 Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from the local labor force, within Rancho Cucamonga or adjacent cities where recreational facilities are planned to support the population. The proposed project is not anticipated to generate the need for additional housing which in turn would generate the need for additional recreational space b) The proposed project does not affect existing recreational opportunities as the site is located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street within an area designated Industrial Park Surrounding property is either developed or proposed for development vae"uauy SlgniMaM ImpaQ Lana Issues and Supporting Information Sources Iwlamwnr unlam maa Sigmflcanl Mitigatl"n SgMflcaM No Im M I eteE Im d Im d 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future projects ) (/) (/) (/) r1 ~J G3`~ C, Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Potengally Sgnificanl Impact Lees Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polentialy unless Than Significant Mibga4on Significant No Im C Incur ateE Im ad Im h d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) No significant adverse impacts to biological resources will occur with development of the proposed protect The maturity of the site is an actively cultivated vineyard with an overall vegetative cover of 40 to 50 percent Based on a map prepared by the USFWS the site occurs within an area designated as the Ontario Recovery Unit for the DSF (Figure 6 of the USFWS Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly) Aside from the vineyard, the site is dominated by non-native plant species A site survey was conducted by Impact Sciences to evaluate potential occurrence of the DSF The report concluded that the subtect property did not support characteristics consistent with DSF habitat due in part to the site's historic and ongoing exposure to agricultural activities Appropriate plants and soil type are not present onsite and therefore the DSF is not expected to occur onsite. r~ U b) The 55 13-acre site could generate significant amounts of fugitive dust during site grading The contractor will be required to minimize dust generation through water applications per the City's standard conditions of approval Additional mitigation measures presented in Section 5 of this Initial Study will reduce impacts to less than significant Noise associated with site construction will not result in an impact as there are no sensitive receptors within the area c) Cumulative effects of developing the site with a 830,300 square foot building may include increased traffic within the immediate vicinity However the impacts are not considered significant as the site plan includes set backs to mitigate potential back up into the street The applicant will be required to pay appropriate transportation fees established for development within the Industrial Districts Fees are used to make roadway improvements with the area to keep the circulation system at acceptable levels of service. d) Development of the distribution/warehouse building would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study did not identify any impacts that would have a potentially significant affect to the environment i G35 ~~ Initial Study for DRC 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 • Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized m completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (/) General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH No. 88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Draft General Plan (June 2001) (/) Draft Environmental Impact Report for the 2001 General Plan (SCH No. 2000061027, June 2001) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (/) US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (Prepared September 14, 1997) ADDITIONAL REPORT AND SURVEYS (/) Impact Sciences, Results of a Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Habitat-Based Evaluation, June 30, 2000. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described m this Intial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature:~-+{ ~ v~ Date: ~`t"~~ Print Name and Title: J.~,ess~~ JU l u-~ f.~sVC.+-s'(~'~ • G3~ • City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance wrth the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DR 00-41 Public Review Period Closes: September 26, 2001 DRC 2001-00534 Project Name: Cabot Distribution Center Project Applicant:Riverside Commeraal Investors Project Location (also see attached map) The protect boundaries are formed by 6"' Street on the north, the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel on the west and Haven Avenue on the east Project Description ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENTREVIEW00-41CABOT Distribution Center III -The proposed protect is the construction and operation of an approximately 830,300 square foot distribution/warehouse building consisting of approximately 815,900 square feet of warehouse space and 14,400 of related office space The building will be developed on approximately 40 acres of a 55 13-acre site bounded by Sixth Street on the north, the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel on the west and Haven Avenue on the east, in Sub-area 6 of the Industrial Distracts (APN 210-072-06, 210-072-16, 210-072-17, 210-072-35) The southern boundary oftte proposed protect represents development of approximately 75 percent of the sde The remaining approximately 15 acres, the area fronting Haven Avenue, is not a part of the proposed protect and no development is currently being proposed As part of the proposed protect, the applicant has requested the deletion of Center Street, south of Sixth Street, from the Industrial Area Currently, Center Street extends southerly from Sixth Street through the center of the protect site The City Traffic Engineer will consider this request In contunction with the whole of the protect Center Street is not a mator roadway and does not currently exist in this location so deletion of the street from the Circulation Plan would not create an adverse affect In the vianlty of the site Center Street was meant to be used as an access road between Sixth and Fourth Streets With the development of the protect site with one large bwlding, Center Street will not be necessary as an access road since the building wdl be accessible directly from Sixth Street FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment G3~ ^ The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but • (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By • G38 RESOLUTION NO • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00534, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6, TO ELIMINATE A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE SOUTH TO TRADEMARK PARKWAY A Recitals 1 Cabot Industrial Trust has filed an application for Development Code Amendment No DRC2001-00534, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subbed Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application ° 2 On the 26th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that day 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specfcally finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and totted 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 26, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows The application applies to property located within the City, and b This amendment would not be materially in~unous or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of fads set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and b This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and ~3°I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DCA DRC2001-00534 -CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 2 c The proposed amendment wdl not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viGmty, and The subted application is consistent with the obtectrves of the Development Code, and The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the fads and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together will all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wdl have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Caldomia Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration ident~es certain signrfcant environmental effects that Hnll result if the protect is approved, all signrficant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Caldomra code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the prated, there rs no evidence that the proposed protect wdl have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlrfe depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Calrfomia Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set force in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No DRC2001-00534 subted to the condition set forth below (1) If the City Counal detennines, through the approval process for said Development Code amendment, that the elimination of this portion of center Avenue rs tustified, this developer Hall be required to acgwre nght-of-way for and construct a cul-de-sac terminus for Trademark Parkway. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DCA DRC2001-00534 -CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH OF SEPTEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Larry T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS G~1 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRCDR00-41 (CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST) This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~.4a M itigation Monitoring Program Page 2 d 3 , as Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is neede determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action Item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. measures . An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP Is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the onsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The res p Department shall require the applicant to post any necessaryfunds (orother forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor Citystaff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an Individual qual~ed to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 1 ~PLANNING~FINALICEOAw1MP FORM W PD ~~}3 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Y r -~. Key to Checklist Abbreviations BrSO_tl 'R®SpOtfSiblEQ~ 61- `z~ {~~s?Fm .w}a +( rMonltorin uen 9Frey ~'~ ~~~ '~"~`',, ~ Method of VecMlceN ti ~ v+.~.em:,.weu.-.we ~'$w ° ~; ~,. - k ~ ~as3nCSlO[19,i y:: xt'~,~~ -<. - CDD -Community Development Duector A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Wdhhold Recordation of Final Map CP -Cary Planner or designee B - Pdor To Construction 8 -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Crry Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWCtlon C -Plan Check 3 -Wdhhold Certificate of Ocwpancy BO -Building OHidal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Suhmittal (Repods /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Flre Chief or desrgnee 6 -Revoke CUP I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEOAVu1MCHKLST W PD • Project File No.: Development Code Amendment DRC 2001-00534 Applicant: Riverside Commercial Investors Initial Study Prepared by: _ Nancv Ferguson Date: August 31, 2001 T H E C I i V O F R A N C h O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE September 26, 2001 10' Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -The Clty of Rancho Cucamonga has completed the Draft Clty of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update The Project Planning Area encompasses the existing Clty (approximately 24,000 acres) as well as Its Sphere-of-Influence (approxlmately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the Clty This update Includes changes In land use designations as well as updates to the policies and programs within all elements the City's General Plan The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of approxlmately 182 acres of residential uses and an Increase of 182 acres in non- resldentlal uses Within the exlstmg City hinds, non-resdenUal acreage Is reduced by 18 acres and resldentlal acreage Is Increased by 18 acres Within the Sphere-of-Influence, the change Is a reduction of 200 acres in resldentlal uses, and an Increase of 200 acres In non-residential uses Wlth the Implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (I e , future) development would occur with bulldout approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of commercial, approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional publlc/quasl-public uses, and approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways The Pro~ect/Planning Area Includes all of the land area within the boundaries of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga and Its Sphere-of-Influence area located directly to the north The City Is located In the southwest corner of San Bernardino County, 13 miles west of downtown San Bernardino The San Gabriel Mountains are located to the north, and the communities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana surround the Clty to the west, south and east, respectively Total acreage within City boundaries is approximately 24,000 acres Total acreage within the Sphere-of-Influence is approximately 7,700 acres Total pro~ecUplanning area comprises approximately 31,700 acres This action will be forwarded to the Clty Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before Clty Council will be separately noticed A Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and Findings of Overriding Considerations have been prepared for this Protect and well be reviewed and a recommendation forwarded to the City Council ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 2001 Page 2 BACKGROUND General Plan Task Force Action On July 2, 2001, the General Plan Task Force reviewed these documents and unanimously recommended they be forwarded for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Counal Environmental Determination The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is intended to serve as an informational document for public agency deasion-makers and the general public regarding the obtectrves and components of the proposed project This document addresses the potentially significant adverse environmental impacts that may be assoaated with bwldout of the proposed General Plan, as well as, identifies feasible mitigation measures and alternatives that may be adopted to reduce or eliminate these impacts This EIR is the primary reference document for the formulation and implementation of a mitigation-monitoring program for the proposed General Plan The intent of this EIR is to provide a Program EIR that evaluates the broad-scale impacts of the General Plan A Program EIR is considered a"first-tier' document (California CEQA gwdelines, Section 15152) "Second-tier" documents, such as Protect EIRs, Focused EIRs, or Mitigated Negative Declarations, typically follow and evaluate the impacts of a single activity undertaken to implement the plan On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR for the General Plan Update was released for the 45-day review period, which ended on August 6, 2001 The EIR and General Plan Task Force staff report was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council Members on June 28, 2001 The Planning Commission is encouraged to provide any comments The Final EIR (including the Response to Comments) has been included for review and the Commission is requested to forward a recommendation to the City Council Draft General Plan Update The proposed protect is the update of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The Planning Area encompasses the existing City (approximately 24,000 acres), as well as its Sphere-of- Influence (approximately 7,700 acres) that is located north of the City This update includes changes in land use designations as well as updates to the policies and programs within the City's General Plan No substantial changes in the existing land use designations are included in the proposed update The proposed General Plan includes the reduction of approximately 182 acres of residential uses and an increase of 182 acres mnon-residential uses Within the existing City limits, non-residential acreage is reduced by 18 acres and residential acreage is increased by 18 acres Within the Sphere-of-Influence, the change is a reduction of 200 acres in residential uses, and an increase of 200 acres mnon-residential uses The change in land uses is attributable to a number of things new guidance for Mixed Use areas and technical refinements to the Plan to reflect exiting or proposed development With the implementation of the proposed General Plan, the following additional (i a ,future) development would occur with buildout approximately 13,524 dwelling units, approximately 9,460,680 square feet of ~°S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 2001 . Page 3 commereal, approximately 52,811,591 square feet of industrial, no additional public/quasi- pubiic uses, and approximately 231 acres of arterials/freeways The singular goal and purpose of the General Plan is to present the Rancho Cucamonga Vision (described further in Chapter II) and give gwdance to its implementation The Plan accomplishes this through a series of pollees and implementation actions or programs related to more specific issues that are important These policies, in turn, are applied to both public and pnvate development protects and deesions Where the City does not have development authority, as in the unincorporated area or regarding certain functions handled by another unit of government, the General Plan seeks to influence the appropriate decision making bodies so that their decisions reinforce our City's vision The General Plan is, in effect, the "Constitution" for development in the community Consequently, it is imperative that it be used as the basic frame of reference in making development and conservation decisions within the planning area, whether they involve public or pnvate lands All pollees within the General Plan are important or they would not be included They are to be applied when the following kinds of decisions are contemplated • Budget allocations that impact the physical development in our planning area, • Review of proposed private development protects, • Review of proposed public protects, including acquisition or disposal of public lands, • Proposals by other levels of government that would affect our community's interests, • Position taking on proposed legislation affecting our community's interests, • Position taking regarding regional planning actiwties affecting our community's interests, and • Proposed programs or actions to implement our General Plan in addition to those described above Policy is expressed in this Plan in both mapped and written form The maps depict the geographic application of policy and express the desired pattern of development and conservation that define our community Written policy expresses decision-making guidance related to what is depicted on the maps or, if the subject is not mapped, as a gwde to certain decision points defined by the policy Additional diagrams and illustrations are included to further assist in interpretation of policy and application to speefic situations Occasionally, users of the General Plan may want additional information regarding the background and reasoning behind policies in the Plan Referring to the Appendices or, in some cases, to the General Plan EIR, can satisfy these needs ~`~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 2001 Page 4 • The Draft General Plan Update represents the complete elements that were previously reviewed at separate times by staff and the General Plan Task Force This Draft has incorporated the changes previously requested Future modifications will be reserved until the end of the public heanng process The Draft General Plan and General Plan Task Force staff report was forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council Members on June 28, 2001 The Planning Commission is encouraged to provide any comments HOUSING ELEMENT MODIFICATIONS On January 24, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment 01-01C for the City's Housing Element update Following Planning Commission review, staff submitted the draft Housing Element update to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on January 31, 2001 HCD had 60 days to review the document, and provided comments and corrections to the City on Apnl 5, 2001 The City responded to HCD's letter on June 7, 2001, making minor text changes and clanfying where specific comments and corrections were located within the Housing Element Following a serves of communications with HCD, additional comments and corrections were provided to HCD on July 23, and August 23, 2001 On Apnl 4, 2001, City staff held a conference call with HCD, where additional comments and corrections were requested by HCD Staff submitted revisions of the Housing Element update to HCD on September 6, 2001 HCD staff has reviewed the latest revisions, and on September 18, 2001, informed City staff that the revisions are acceptable and a letter of compliance will be sent. The following minor revisions reflect those comments and corrections, and are the only changes to the Housing Element update since the Planning Commission received the General Plan Update m June 2001 Following HCD's final acceptance of the City's Housing Element update, the City Councl will consider the entire General Plan Update, which includes the Housing Element, in October A summary of the corrections is listed as follows, with corrected pages highlighted for inclusion in your General Plan Housing Element • Program 2 A 4 Provide for the adoption of density bonus provisions Revisions provide for compliance within 180 days of Housing Element adoption Program 2 C 2 Provide for the adoption of emergency shelter provisions Revisions provide for compliance within 180 days of Housing Element adoption Housing Element Technical Appendix Section VI - Governmental Constraints Provided discussion to explain why the City's Parking Standards and Design Review process are not a constraint on development I~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 26, 2001 Page 5 ANALYSIS This update of the General Plan is very thorough and because of certain technical advances, such as the use of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology for the preparation of maps and storage and retrieval of information, the City realizes a greater benefit than from the last update This is significant because one of the advantages we now have is the ability to manage and maintain General Plan information much more readily than in the past In effect, the General Plan in its current form is a powerful resource and land management device that will contribute to the City government's efficiency and effectiveness in making and carrying out development deasions It is interesting to note that the amount of land use change reflected in this version of the Plan relative to earlier versions is surpnsingly slight This speaks to two things 1) previous land use policy direction has proven to be sound, and 2) many aspects of community development now requiring attention have more to do with sustaining the quality of development than shaping changes in what land use patterns are desired RECOMMENDATION Review and wmment as needed after public comment is considered Adopt the attached Resolutions recommending approval of the Draft General Plan Update and Certification of the Final EIR Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB LH\Is Attachments Exhibit "A" -Addendum -Responses to Comments for Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)(Previously Circulated with staff report dated September 12, 2001) Exhibit "B" -Mitigation Monitoring Program (Previously circulated with staff report dated September 12, 2001) Exhibit "C" -Housing Element Update, Pages 1-116 and 1-118 Exhibit "D" -Housing Element Update, Technical Appendix VI -Government Constraints, Pages 4, 14 and 15 Resolution Recommending the Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Resolution Recommending Approval of the Draft General Plan Update EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" WERE DISTRIBUTED WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 2001 ~~ . ti' ,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM 2.A.3: Monitor restricted, affordable housing production within the redevelopment project area assisted by the Redevelopment Agency Taroet New homeowner and renter households within the redevelopment project area assisted by the Redevelopment Agency Responsible Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga, Redevelopment Agency and Planning Division, Private Sector Financina Public and Private Sector Cooperation Schedule On-going PROGRAM 2 A.4: Apply the State density bonus law and to develop an ordinance within the annual work program schedule utilizing density bonus provisions to implement density bonus regwrements (consistent with Government Code §65915) Target To be determined at time of individual request • Responsible Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Diwswn Financing General Fund, City Budget Schedule Add to the 2001-2002 Planning Division annual work program and adopt density bonus provisions within 180 days of adoption of the Housing Element update PROGRAM 2.A.5: Continue informal discussions with private developers and multi-family apartment managers encouraging use of federal rental assistance programs to assist lower income households residing and/or working in the City and continue to support San Bernardino County Housing Authority ("SBCHA") applications for additional federal vouchers to meet the needs of low-income households now residing in the City Taroet The SBCHA provides housing assistance to 186 households residing in the City as of June 30, 2000 This includes 170 Section 8 vouchers and 16 public housing units Responsible Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division, Private sector, San Bernardino County Housing 11 ~ `' Authority • \ Financino HUD Rental Assistance Programs Page /-116 CUy of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan C IW/NNT1Temporary Infemet FrlesIOLK81Chapter 3 Housing Rev doc September 10, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Schedule On-going POLICY 2.C: Assist providers of temporary emergency shelter and transitional housing opportunities PROGRAM 2.C.1: Continue to assist the efforts of local organizations, and community groups to provide temporary emergency shelter, transitional housing opportunities, and services to the City's homeless population Tar et Identified homeless population Responsible Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division, local organizations and community groups Financino CDBG Schedule On-going PROGRAM 2.C.2: Evaluate existing Code requirements to determine those conditions and standards where various types of shelter facilities may be located, including review and evaluation of industrial districts Research and evaluate special requirements for location of shelters for abused women and children, specifically the need for an anonymous address Target Identified homeless population with special emphasis on needs of abused women and children Responsible Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing General Fund, City Budget, and CDBG Schedule Add to the 2001-2002 Planning Division annual work program and adopt emergency shelter provisions within 180 days of adoption of the Housing Element updatelL~H31 PROGRAM 2.C.3: Participate with adtacent communities toward the provision of a subregional shelter program and encourage the County to develop a comprehensive homeless program Target Identified homeless population Responsible Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division, Area cities, County • Financino Not Applicable Page I-118 C IWINNT1Temporary Intemef Ftles10LKBIChapfer3Hpusing Rev tlw Cuy of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan September ]0, 2001 • Governmental Constraints Bwlding standards, such as parking and height requirements, generally do not provide a constraint to development Typically, bwlding heights are permitted to increase with increased density Parking is based upon the umt type and number of bedrooms Carports are permitted in multi-family developments when approved by the Design Review Committee The vanability of these development standards permits a wide vanety of housing types, including single and multi- family, rental and ownership, and mobile homes Application of these development standards to the remaining vacant land resources will continue to provide a broad range of housing alternatives consistent with the City's share of the Regional Housing Need (For vacant land analysis see Tables IV-1 and IV-2, as well as Map IV-1) The City's parking standards are not a constraint on development The current parking standards for multi-family protects have been in effect since 1987, and regwre a range of 1 3 parking spaces for a studio unit to 2 3 spaces for afour-bedroom unit Because of the significant number of apartment units developed under these standards, and the fact that the City is not aware of complaints from the development community obtecting to these standards, the imposition of parking regwrements on the development ofmulti-family protects is not a constraint on development Annexation Potential The City's Sphere-of-Influence is located north of the City between the City limits and the National Forest Boundary in environmentally hazardous and sensitive areas The resulting constraints limit the range of potential residential development Annexations have added "Low" • and "Very Low" single-family residential development areas to the City No new annexations have occurred since 1989, however an annexation for 504 acres is currently being processed The ENSP was adopted on Apnl 1, 1992 as a pre-zone for future annexation Land in the Sphere-of-Influence lacks urban infrastructure, and much of the area is expected to remain as open space Developable areas have slopes in excess of 8% and are subtect to the City's Hillside Development Regulation Ordinance Residential development in the sphere areas will be more expensive and at lower average density than residential development within the current City boundanes Consequently, annexation is expected to prove sites for move-up rather than for affordable housing • ~` ~' VI - 4 (September 2001) Governmental Constraints • TABLE VI-6 School Enrollment School Public/ Private Grade Span 1994-1995 School Year 1999-2000 School Year Alta Loma School Distnct Public K thru 8 7,755 7,629 Central School Distnct Public Kthru 8 4,723 5,116 Cucamonga School District Public K thru 8 2,368 2,770 Etiwanda School Distnct Public K thru 8 4,658 7,400 Harvard Place Pnvate K thru 8 0 161 Sacred Heart Elementary Private K thru 8 242 285 Alta Loma Chnstian Private preschl-8 300 278 Children's Learning World Private preschl-8 260 260 Pacific Coast Schools Pnvate preschl-8 45 45 Montesson School House Pnvate 3 thru 12 66 60 Alta Loma High School Public 9 thru 12 2,556 2,891 Etiwanda High School Public 9 thru 12 1,992 3,237 Rancho Cucamonga High School Public 9 thru 12 2,310 2,894 Total 27,275 33,026 Source - School Distncts and Pnvate Schools • E LOCAL PROCESSING AND PERMIT PROCEDURES Processing and Permit Procedures The development review process, from the time of formal application submittal through review by the Planning Commission is 11 weeks with the goal of the reducing the processing time 8 weeks, to reach this goal some technical issues will be resolved dunng plan check The review process includes review before vanous recommending committees mcludmg the Trails, Grading, Technical Review, and Design Review Committees The process is designed so that all of the necessary reviewing departments, including Planning, Building and Safety, Engmeenng, Community Services, Sheriff, and Fire are involved m the pro)ect review from the earliest stages As a result, City agencies function in a coordinated manner and the applicant is appraised of any concerns early in the review process The development review process provides the applicant two methods of being appraised of development issues pnor to submittal of a formal application This includes aPre-Application Review where the applicant of larger pro)ects submits plans for an informal meeting with the Planning Commission, and a Preliminary Review where the applicant submits plans for a staff review and comment of the pro)ect The intent of both revew procedures is to make the applicant aware of design and development concerns early on m the review process to minimize the potential for delays dunng fomtal revew The same review format is used for residential, commeraal, and mdustnal pro)ects The actual revew process may extend beyond the 11-week penod For example, a complex protect, significant unresolved environmental issues, or inadequate plans may lengthen the review • VI - 14 (September 2001) • Govemmentai Constraints penod The resolution of design issues infrequently extends processing time The development review process provides a minimum of three weeks notice to the public pnor to a protest's first public heanng by the Planning Commission For infill protect and large protects, neighborhood meetings are scheduled early in the application process in order to identify and address community concems and address those concerns pnor to Planning Commission consideration In 1994, the Planning Commission requested process-streamlining policies In the first revision of the development review process, the City Planner may consider and decide routine matters For example, tentative tract proposals for less than 10 acres sites which are not located on an artenal street, and non-construction Conditional Use Permits The City Planner provides a public notice of meeting and conducts a hearing pnor to decision on such protects Design Review The design review process is not a constraint on development, but rather a means of obtaining high quality development The Development Code does not contain adopted architectural standards, but rather has specific development standards for building setback, building height, parking, landscaping, and lot coverage Development Code standards are provided on-line for up-to-date access to current requirements Pamphlets containing wntten Residential and Commercial/Industnal Design Guidelines were established to assist applicants in addressing common design concerns within their protect The Residential Design Guidelines provide gwdance on site planning, subdivision design, variation in unit design, grading, architecture, landscaping, fencing, and trails • Design considerations are evaluated by a Design Review Committee, which is comprised of a subcommittee of the Planning Commission Initially, development applications are submitted and reviewed by staff During this review various completeness, technical, and design comments are provided to the applicant early in the development review process Once staff has accepted a complete application, the Design Review Committee will review the protect design and consider such aspects as building mass, proportion, and scale, building placement and onentation, relationship to other buildings on site, proposed colors, landscaping enhancement, lighting, pedestrian onentation, vehicle access, and parking Following review by the Design Review Committee, the Committee will make a recommendation to either the City Planner or Planning Commission for final protect review The design review process does not increase the application processing time as the design review runs concurcently with the subdivision and/or site planning review as a unified protect For residential protects, the applicant may choose to separate the subdivision and architectural design review portions of their protect, or may choose to process a custom lot subdivision without any protect architecture In either case, the review processes and procedures do not change, as the development application will still be subtect to staff, Committee, and Commission review The City's design review process is not a constraint on development, but rather a means of obtaining a high quality development All of these procedures are established to minimize the review time-period, and thereby reduce the overall cost to the applicant due to processing delays The availability of pre-application review, on-line development standards, and wntten design gwdelines all assist in alleviating the applicants uncertainty and avoid unreasonable time delays in the review of their application • VI - 15 (September 2001) RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Rentals 1 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in conformance with the requirements of State Law, adopted a complete General Plan and certified the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan on April 6, 1981, by the approval of Resolution No 81-40 2 After vanous amendments and partial updates, the City commenced the process of preparing a comprehensive update of its General Plan in 1999 The process of updating the General Plan has involved vanous departments of the City and included numerous meetings of a General Plan Task Force, which was comprised of representatives from the City Council, Planning Commission, staff and community members As a result of that process, a draft General Plan Update has now been completed 3 An Initial Study was prepared for the General Plan Update (the "protect") pursuant to Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines by the Planning Department staff with the assistance of the City's environmental consultant, Michael Brandman Assoaates The Initial Study, which was completed on May 22, 2000, identified that there was substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant impact on several environmental resources and governmental services Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 and 15081, a deasion was made to prepare an EIR for the protect 4 On May 22, 2000, a Notice of Preparation was prepared and sent to the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research for the State of California and to other responsible agenaes The review period on the Notice of Preparation closed on July 7, 2000 5 On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR was completed and made available for public review Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR, which was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research Public Notice of Availability of the EIR and of the comment period was provided pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092 and a copy of the Notice was posted in the office of the County Clerk in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092 3 The EIR was circulated to interested agenaes between June 22, 2001, and August 6, 2001, fora 45-day comment period pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15087 Comments were received and responses prepared and incorporated into the EIR A copy of the final EIR is on file in the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 On September 12, and continued to September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public hearing on the General Plan Update and Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in accordance with the requirements Government Code Section 65355 and 65090 7 The final Environmental Impact Report referred to in this resolution consists of that draft document dated June, 2001, entitled Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Draft Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2000061027), written comments on `~ l~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-85 EIR FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 2 that draft report, and written responses thereto submitted by the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, an Addendum to the EIR attached as Exhibit "A" of the September 12, 2001, staff report of this item, and wntten testimony presented by City staff and the City's consultant dunng the hearings on the recommended adoption of said General Plan Update insofar that the testimony pertained to environmental matters Hereinafter, the above-mentioned documents will be referred to as "the Final EIR " All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 The Final EIR has been reviewed and considered by the Planning Commission, pnor to making its recommendations on the General Plan Update, and the Planning Commission finds, pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15090, that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Gwdelines, and the City's local CEQA Gwdelines The Planning Commission further finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192 1 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15084(e), that the Final EIR has been independently analyzed by City staff and the Planning Commission, and that the Final EIR represents and reflects the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission with respect to the protect 2 The additional information provided in the staff report accompanying the EIR, the Addendum to the EIR, and Response to Comments provided in Exhibit "A" to the staff report, and the evidence presented in wntten and oral testimony presented at the above-mentioned heanng does not represent significant new information so as to regwre re-circulation of the EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192 1 3 Based on all of the findings, evidence, and information presented, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15090, that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Gudelines, and the City's local CEQA Gwdelines, find that, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 20192 1 and State CEQA Gudelines Section 15084(e), that the Final EIR has been independently analyzed by the City and represents and reflects the independent judgment of the City with respect to the protect, and then certify the Final EIR APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ~13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-85 EIR FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 3 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE 2001 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND MAKING ADDITIONAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW A Recitals 1 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in conformance with the requirements of State Law, adopted a complete General Plan and certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan on April 6, 1981, by the approval of Resolution No 81-40 2 After vanous amendments and partial updates, the City commenced the process of preparing a comprehensive update of its General Plan in 1999 The process of updating the General Plan has involved vanous departments of the City and included numerous meetings of a General Plan Task force, which was comprised of representatives from the City Councl, Planning Commission, staff, and community members As a result of that process, a draft General Plan Update has now been completed +~ 3 The General Plan Update was prepared pursuant to Section 65300 et seq of the State Planning and Zoning Law (California Government Code) to provide the City with comprehensive, long-range policy guidelines for future growth and development which incorporates the mandated elements, including Land Use, Circulation (Transportation), Housing, Conservation (Environmental Resources), Open Space, Noise, and Safety (Public Health and Safety) In addition, the General Plan Update sets forth 'The Rancho Cucamonga Vision" and includes additional provisions to address Public Faalities and Services, Community Design, Economic Development, and Air Quality 4 An Initial Study was prepared for the General Plan Update (the "protect") pursuant to Section 15063 of the State CEQA Gwdelines by the Planning Department staff with the assistance of the City's environmental consultant, Michael Brandman Associates The Initial Study, which was completed on May 22, 2000, identified that there was substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant impact on several environmental resources and governmental services Pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15064 and 15081, a deasion was made to prepare an EIR for the protect 5 On May 22, 2000, a Notice of Preparation was prepared and sent to the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research for the State of California and to other responsible agenaes The review period on the Notice of Preparation closed on July 7, 2000 6 On June 22, 2001, the Draft EIR was completed and made available for public review Pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15085, the City prepared a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR, which was filed with the State Office of Planning and Research Public Notice of Availability of the EIR and of the comment period was provided pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092 and a copy of the Notice was posted in the office of the n~5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-66 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 2 County Clerk in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21092 3 The EIR was circulated to interested agencies between June 22, 2001, and August 6, 2001, fora 45-day comment period pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15087 Comments were received and responses prepared and incorporated into the EIR A copy of the Final EIR is on file in the Planning Droision in the City 7 On September 12, and continued to September 26, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed City initiated public hearing on the General Plan Update and Draft General Plan EIR Notice of the time, place, and subtect matter of the hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in accordance with the requirements of Govemment Code Section 65355 and 65090 8 The Final EIR referred to in this resolution consists of that draft document dated June 2001, entitled Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update, Draft Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2000061027), written comments on that draft report, and written responses and an addendum to the EIR submitted by the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, attached as Exhibit "A" of the September 12, 2001 staff report for this item, and written testimony presented by the City's staff and the City's consultant during the hearings on the recommended adoption of said General Plan Update, insofar that the testimony pertained to environmental matters Hereinafter, the above-mentioned documents wdl be referred to as "the Final EIR " 9 The General Plan Update was prepared in accordance with the General Plan Gwdelines promulgated by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research In addition, the Noise Element was prepared consistent with the guidelines established by the Office of Noise Control in the State Department of Health Services, and the Circulation (Transportation) Element is consistent with the currently applicable Congestion Management Plan 10 The City submitted the proposed General Plan Update to other public agencies for review as follows (a) The draft Housing Element was submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review On August 14, 2001, HCD informed the City that only minor changes to the Element would be required to obtain its certification, which changes have now been made (b) The City consulted with the Division of Mines and Geology of the Department of Conservation and the Office of Emergency Services for the purposes of including information known by that Diwsion into the General Plan as required by Government Code Section 65302 (g) In addition, the provisions that comprised the Safety Element were submitted to the same Division for review of seismic safety pohaes (c) The proposed General Plan Update was distributed for review and comment pursuant to Government Code Section 65352 to interested parties including, but not limited to, the County of San Bernardino, local school districts, water purveyors, and other interested parties 11 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred -N ~ (° PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE . September 26, 2001 Page 3 B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 The Planning Commission speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct 2 With respect to the potential significant environmental effects identified in the Final EIR, the Planning Commission specifically makes the following findings a Soils and Geology (1) Modifications in topography will occur within the sphere-of-influence area The modifications will result from cutting native slopes Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that restrict upland areas to low density . residential use and continued enforcement of the Hillside Development Ordinance and Guidelines that ensures prudent development of properties that have a slope greater than 10% and preservation, as open space, properties that have a slope greater than 30% (2) The proposed General Plan would allow the development of hillside residential uses within the northern portion of the Planning Area This area includes geologic hazards such as potential slope failures, landslides, and erosion Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the sigrnficant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that, among other things, regwre geologic engineering investigations for developments proposed in areas of potential geologic hazards, restrictions on development in areas with unsafe geological conditions, mitigation of private properties where City property or public right-of-way is threatened from slope instability, or where considered appropriate and urgent by the City Engineer, Fire, or Police Departments, disaster recovery measures following severe winter storms, and athird-party review of geotechnical reports for private development protects (3) Development occurring within the Planning Area and under the proposed General Plan could experience seismic hazards These hazards include ground rupture, ground shaking, and ground failure Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than ~7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 4 sigmficant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that include, but are not limited to, regulating the type and intensity of new development in potential seismic hazard areas, compliance with State regulations, including setbacks, for Special Study Zones, strengthening planned utilities, encouraging the retrofitting of unreinforced masonry buildings, and other measures (4) Construction activities associated with the implementation of the proposed General Plan could result inshort-term windblown sand impacts Changes or alterations have been requred in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The sigmficant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by wrtue of mitigation measure as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that include encouraging the preservation of existing wind rows (landscape buffers which reduce impacts from windblown sand), the planting of protective landscape buffers on the eastern sides of proposed protects, review of architectural plans for structures to reduce "wind tunnel" effects, cooperating with neighboring ~unsdictions in the reduction of windblown sand, and requiring the suspension of grading operations during high winds b Hydrology and Drainage (1) Grading activities associated with the implementation of the proposed General Plan wdl result in cut and/or fill activities for the future land uses Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The sigmficant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than sigmficant by a mitigation measure as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that regwres the use of best management practices to minimize pollutant runoff (2) Implementation of the proposed General Plan would result in the development of approximately 5,000 acres of urban land uses that would substantially increase the potential storm water runoff from areas throughout the Planning Area Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the sigrnficant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that regwre storm water facilities to be constructed that are adequate to accommodate the surface water runoff generated by new development, the continued upgrade of the City's drainage system in contunction with plans and funds provided by the County of San Bernardino Flood Control Distract, periodic review its flood control fees to ensure adequate funding is available to construct the City's drainage system, and review and input into the level of development intensity and current T't ~ g PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 5 conservation practices within the City's sphere-of-influence and the San Bernardino National Forest (3) With an increase in stormwater runoff from future development under the proposed General Plan, there would also be the potential for an increase in pollutants from new land uses that are conveyed to creeks, spreading grounds and groundwater basins Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that will promote programs to protect water quality and to conserve water supplies in coordination with the Cucamonga County Water Distnct, protection of natural stream courses in the Planning Area from erosion and pollution from urban runoff, and Implementation of best management practices to minimize pollutant runoff and percolation into the groundwater basin This wdl include, where applicable, the preparation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Programs (SWPPPs) to control runoff from construction sites c Biological Resources (1) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may potentially affect natural biological communities Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that include the City undertaking an inventory of remaining natural areas within City limits for the purpose of retaining important areas in their natural state, limiting encroachment of development into these natural areas that have biological significance such as the canyons in the existing sphere-of- influence area, requesting through County planning offiaals, expanded biological studies for all proposed developments within the sphere-of- influence (2) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may potentially affect alluvial fan sage scrub, a sensitive plant community Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that include the establishment of a biological assessmenU cleannghouse to identify areas of potential impacts, especially regarding rare or endangered speaes of flora and fauna, the establishment of a conservation land use designation to preserve the existing alluvial fan sage scrub This should include most of the remaining alluvial associations and P ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 6 all of the streamside woodland, designation of approximately 1,000 acres of open space within a conservation area in the Planning Area (3) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect threatened or endangered speaes Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the sigrnfiaant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than s~grnficant by virtue of mitigation measure as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that regwres that any development that results in the potential take or substantial loss of occupied habitat for any threatened or endangered species wdl require formal consultation with the appropriate regulatory agency -~.J (4) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect nesting habitat for migratory bird speaes Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that protect migratory birds and raptor nests, encourage the planting of vegetation that will provide new habitat and the retention of speafied windrows (5) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect Big Horn Sheep Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than sigmficant by virtue of mitigation measure as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that protect areas designated as sensitive, or unique, or those that contain rare, threatened, or endangered speaes, against direct or indirect impacts (6) Implementation of the proposed General Plan may affect turisdictional waters of the U S Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by wrtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that restricts proposed development, including road development, in certain defined and documented riparian corridors, compliance with the USACE Nationwide Permit Program, Section 401 water quality certifications from the Regional Water Quality Control Board and Section 1603 streambed alteration agreements, as regwred d Land Use and Planning (1) An increase in development may result in potential land use incompatibilities Incompatible land uses increase the potential for land use ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE • September 26, 2001 Page 7 conflicts to create noise, visual, development intensity, and privacy impacts Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that, among other things, promotes opportunities for mixed use development in carefully selected areas, restricts strip commeraal development in favor of more focused commercial or mixed use centers, restricts the intensity of commercal concentrations at intersections other than town center and regional center locations, lowering residential intensities when adtacent to low density residential neighborhoods, restricting intensive uses and activities in areas where they would be threatened by man made hazards, concentrating heavy industrial uses to areas east of the electrical power plant and allowing medium and high density residential uses along transit routes in mixed-use areas and in the vianity of activity centers e Traffic and Circulation (1) Implementation of the proposed General Plan as well as year 2020 traffic • volumes from adtoining sties and areas wdl result in an approximately 128 percent (821,000 daily trips) increase over existing datly trips Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that include the required preparation of traffic impact studies in accordance with the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP), preparation of site-speafic access studies, annual traffic monitoring programs to ensure that funds from developers and development fees remain adequate to finance on-going arculation protects, implementation of changes in roadway classifications as identified, and the construction of the 6"' StreeUl-15 interchange (2) The proposed General Plan wdl result in 18 intersections operating at LOS D or worse Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that require traffic studies for both interim and future conditions at such intersections in connection with future development protects, the preservation of sufficient right-of-way, and speafied improvements at certain intersections r-~ LJ 11~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 • Page 8 f Noise (1) Any siting of sensitive land uses, such as schools, churches, and commercial office uses within the 60 and 65 dBA CNEL noise contours represents a potentially significant impact Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that include requinng protect applicants to comply with increased setbacks, the use of site-specific noise studies, and then compliance with vanous sound mitigation measures and strategies as defined (2) The proposed General Plan includes the siting of general mdustnal uses immediately adtacent to residential land uses between Haven and Grove Avenues, south of Arrow Route Resultant noise from these general mdustnal uses could exceed both the applicable 60 dBA daytime and 45 dBA nighttime standards Speafic economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or protect alternatives identified in the final EIR The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than sigmficant by virtue of a mitigation measure as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that precludes mdustnal facilities from being constructed within 500 feet of any commeraal land uses or 2,800 feet of any residential land uses without the preparation of a noise analysis g Public Service and Utilities (1) Police Services Development under the proposed General Plan will result in a demand for approximately 31 new police officers This increased demand for police services is a significant impact Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The sigmficant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than sigrnficant by virtue of mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that provides that the City continue to adequately fund police services, regularly evaluate and adtust its came prevention programs, maintain an average five-minute response time for emergency calls, encourage the use of physical site planning as a tool in came prevention, the continued promotion of neighborhood watch and crime prevention programs, and the continued use of volunteer forces (e g , reserves and atizen patrol) to assist with police duty (2) Fire Services Development under the proposed General Plan will regwre approximately 6 additional on duty fire fighters (or approximately 18 new fire fighters due to the three shifts that the Department has per day) Increased demand for fire protection and emergency medical services is a ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 9 significant impact Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that provide that the City will continue to support the reduction of Urban Wddland threats through fire prevention, public education, code compliance, internal fire sprinklers, vegetation medications and reduction, adequate water supplies, improved ingress and egress to development and adequately located, staffed, and equipped Fire District stations In addition, the City will continue to support adequate funding of the Fire District and the provision of adequate fire flows by adequate water storage, among other measures (3) Water The proposed General Plan will result in the incremental demand for approximately 10 1 million gallons of water within the Planning Area This increase in water demand represents an approximately 35 percent increase over existing demand within the Planning Area This increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant impact on existing water faalities Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that provide that the City will coordinate with the Cucamonga County Water District and Inland Empire Utilities Agency to ensure adequate water supplies and faalities, clustering of development in areas swtable for groundwater replenishment, integration of structures to retain precipitation and runoff into development designs, continued support of the Cucamonga County Water District's efforts to develop canyon water supply and to encourage water conservation, cooperation in efforts to expand the re-use of wastewater where feasible, and continued implementation of applicable provisions fo the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for municipal and private protects to protect ground water recharge areas from potential pollutant runoff (4) Wastewater The proposed General Plan will result in the incremental generation of approximately 4 0 million gallons per day of wastewater This increase in wastewater represents an approximately 31 percent increase over the existing generation of wastewater within the Planning Area This increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant impact on existing wastewater faalities Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by virtue of a mitigation measure as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that provides that the City will coordinate with ~l~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 10 the Inland Empire Utility Agency and the Cucamonga County Water District to ensure adequate wastewater facilities are available to meet future growth (5) Solid Waste Development under the proposed General Plan will result in the generation of approximately 236 tons of additional solid waste This increase represents an approximately 87 percent increase over the amount of solid waste that is currently being generated within the Planning Area This increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant impact on existing solid waste facilities Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that provide that the City will continue to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939, and that the City will coordinate with other public entities and solid waste haulers to ensure adequate services and faalities are available inside and outside the County to collect and dispose of solid waste (6) Natural Gas The proposed General Plan will result in an incremental demand for natural gas throughout the Planning Area As shown in Table 5 9-9, there will be a demand for approximately 32 9 million therms of natural gas per year This represents an approximately 81 percent increase in natural gas that is currently in demand throughout the Planning Area This increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant impact on existing natural gas faalities Changes or alterations have been regwred in, or incorporated into, the protect, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that provide that the City will provide population protections to The Gas Company to ensure adequate planning for natural gas demands (7) Electnci The proposed General Plan will result in an incremental demand for electricity throughout the Planning Area There will be a demand for approximately 659 million kilowatts of electricity per year This represents an approximately 117 percent increase in electricity that is currently in demand throughout the Planning Area This increase is considered substantial and would result in a significant impact on existing electrical facilities Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that provide that the City will promote and pursue various specified strategies to decrease dependence on imported and non-renewable energy resources, promote ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 11 arculation planning that will contribute to the reduction of operational energy regwrements, promote use of energy efficient programs into commercal and industrial developments where feasible, promote strategies for a balance of housing and employment opportunities within the City and region, and provide population projections to Southern California Edison to ensure adequate energy planning (8) Library Services Implementation of the proposed General Plan would add approximately 13,524 residential units and approximately 30,680 people to the Planning Area compared to the residential units and population that existed in the Planning Area as of January 2000 This increase in residents wdl substantially increase the demand for library services Based on a minimum standard of 0 5 square feet of library space per person, the incremental increase of approximately 30,680 residents to the Planning Area would result in a demand for approximately 15,500 square feet of library space The City does not have any currently planned library facilities within the Planning Area Therefore, the residents associated with the future development of the proposed General Plan would significantly impact existing library services Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the project that provides that the City will provide a minimum of 15,500 square feet of library space with the Planning Area to serve future residents pursuant to the Library Master Plan h Aesthetics and Visual Resources Buildout of the proposed General Plan would result in a substantial increase in urban uses throughout the Planning Area The proposed General Plan would allow replacement of existing uses; however, the matonty of the new development is expected to occur on vacant land (New development wdl be expected to conform to the design guidelines established for residential, commercial, and industrial development, however A high level of quality through design wdl be expected based on existing guidelines and the design review process conducted by staff and officals) Future development in accordance with the proposed General Plan in the Etiwanda Specfic Plan and sphere-of-influence areas is expected to substantially alter open space views This alteration is also expected to include obstructing existing panoramic views of the alluvial fan at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains The conversion of open space to urban uses would result in the obstruction of existing open views as well as potentially obstructing distant panoramic views from existing development Changes or alterations have been requred in, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 12 RESOLUTION NO 01-86 level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that will preserve and enhance the special qualities of existing districts and neighborhoods through focused attention on land use, community design and economic development, establishment of entry monumentation as a means of stimulating community, distract and neighborhood identity, continued implementation and updating of the City's comprehensive design gwdelmes, the establishment of transitions between developed and the natural (unbwlt) environment, the creation of strong landscape edges along roadways, the continued undergrounding of utilities, ensuring that communication towers blend into the surcounding environment, maintain the rural development patterns and character of the Etiwanda area through the Etiwanda Specific Plan, create urban centers at appropriate locations, ensure trees and structures are oriented to preserve views of key locations and obstruction of views is kept to a minimum, and protect and preserve windrows, vineyards and estrus groves where feasible and the re-establishment of these specal landscape elements within the City Cultural Resources (1) Prehistoric Archaeologic Resources The impacts act of future construction activity could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources Changes or alterations have been required m, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that provide that a qualified archaeologist perform necessary field surveys where evidence suggests the potential for prehistoric resources, communication with the Native American Heritage Commission as speafied when there is the potential for discovery of sacred land resources, and compliance with various archaeological protocols as defined (2) Historic Archaeologic Resources The impacts of future construction activity could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential historical landmarks and points of interest Changes or alterations have been required m, or incorporated into, the protect that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that require the City to conduct surveys, communicate with relevant historical preservation agenaes and entities and compliance with a variety of historic preservation protocols (3) Paleontological Resources Older alluvial deposits have a high sensitivity rating as they may yield highly significant vertebrate fossils, although no paleontological resources have been recorded from the area within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere-of-influence Changes or }}fib PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 13 alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than significant by mitigation measures as identified in the final EIR and incorporated into the protect that regwre the City to conduct surveys, communicate with relevant paleontological preservation agencies and entities and compliance with a vanety of paleontological preservation protocols 3 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regwres the lead agency to balance the benefits of a proposed protect against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the protect The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to approve the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update protect although significant and unavoidable adverse impacts related to aggregate resources, prime farmland, short-term and long-term air quality, long-term noise, library services, and aesthetic and casual resources have been identified in the EIR Even though these adverse impacts are not reduced to a level considered less than significant, the Planning Commission finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 (c) that those impacts are outweighed by the benefits of implementing the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update because the General Plan Update, will (a) Conserve valuable natural resources by establishing policies under a new conservation land use designation within the City and sphere-of-influence (b) Provide more effiaent, pedestrian-friendly use patterns at key locations by establishing a new mixed use land use designation that is well-defined and would espeaally promote toint development of residential and commercial uses (c) Provide land use changes to the General Plan that would result in less overall traffic volumes than under the existing General Plan (d) Continue and augment the land use patterns and policy direction in the existing General Plan to the maximum extent possible because of their demonstrated effectiveness (e) Provide development and conservation direction for future annexation of the sphere-of-influence area (f) Continue to preserve a large portion of the sphere-of-influence as open space (g) Promote pollees to ensure City compliance with recent changes in venous federal and state laws (e g Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act) In addition, the General Plan Update is itself a measure to mitigate potential adverse impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a planned and comprehensive approach to future development The General Plan Update includes current statistical information on the community and reflects changes in development policies as well as established policies incorporated in the General Plan at its adoption in 1981 The General Plan ~~7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 14 provides appropriate gwdance for the establishment of zoning and development regulations to mitigate growth induced impacts Consequently, the adoption of the General Plan Update will result in potential environmental effects that are substantially less significant in scope than would occur without General Plan guidance, including each alternative analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Report Therefore, the Planning Commission, having reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR and the public record, recommends that the City Counel adopt these Statements of Overriding Considerations, which has been balanced against the sigmficant unavoidable adverse impacts in reaching a deasion on this protect 4 The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the alternatives to the protect discussed in the Final EIR Those alternative are (1) the "No ProtecUNo Development" alternative (EIR pages 7-2 - 7-3), (2) the "No ProtecUDevelopment inAccordance with Existing General Plan Land Use Designations" alternative (EIR pages 7-3 - 7-8), and (3) the "Higher Intensity" altemative (EIR pages 7-8 - 7-13) With respect to these altematives to the protect, the Planning Commission finds, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081, that there are economic, social, and other considerations of the protect that makes these alternatives infeasible as speefically set forth on pages 7-1 - 7-13 of the EIR which findings are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein In addition, the Planning Commission finds that other than the "No Protect" alternative, the proposed General Plan would result in less impacts compared to the existing General Plan alternative and the "Higher Intensity" alternative Therefore, for the reasons indicated above, and for the reasons specified in Section 3 above, the proposed General Plan Update is considered the environmentally superior alternative 5 The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Mitigation Morntonng Program attached as Exhibit "A" to this resolution, and finds that the Program has been prepared pursuant to the regwrements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation 6 The Planning Commission finds that the City has reviewed the Housing Element Gwdelines adopted by HCD pursuant to Section 50459 of the Health and Safety Code and finds that the housing goals, obtectives, and pollees stated in the revised Housing Element are appropriate for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will contribute to the attainment of the state housing goal The Planning Commission further finds that the adoption of the revised Housing Element will aid the City's efforts to assist in the development of housing for all economic and demographic segments of the community and that the Housing Element reflects the regwrements of Govemment Code Section 65583 (b) The Planning Commission has considered the findings made by the State Department of Housing and Community Development, and finds, pursuant to Govemment Code Section 65585 (e)(1), that the revised Housing Element has been changed to substantially comply with the comments of the State Department of Housing and Community Development and with the provisions of Article 10 6 of Title 7 of the California Government Code (Govemment Code Section 65580 et seq ) 7 Based upon the findings contained herein, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Counal adopt the Mitigation Morntoring Program prepared for the ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-86 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE September 26, 2001 Page 15 General Plan Update and adopt the 2001 General Plan Update, as drafted, as the approved General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS H~9 T H E C I T V O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE September 26, 2001 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY KIrt A Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-41 - CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST -The development of an 830,000 square foot Industrlal bullding on 39 96-acres of land In the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), located on the south side of 6th Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues - APN 210-072-06, 11, 16, 17, and 35 Related files Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534, Industrial Area Speafic Plan Amendment 00-02, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00394. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Existing Industrlal development, General Industrial Dlstnct (Subarea 5) South - Exlsting Industrial development, Industrial Park Dlstnct (Subarea 6) East - Vacant parcel, Haven Avenue Overlay Industrial Park Dlstnct (Subarea 6) West - Industrial building under construction, General Industrlal Dlstnct (Subarea 5) B General Plan Deslonatlons North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrlal Park West - Generallndustrial C Slte Characteristics The site Is located on the south side of 6th Street approximately 490 feet west of Haven Avenue The site Is generally flat with a slight slope to the south The entire site Is undeveloped except for an existing 4,000 square foot metal bullding on APN 210-072-17 The westerly portion of the site Is presently planted with vineyards Single tenant Industrlal buildings surround the property on the north, west, and south The parcel Immediately east of the site is vacant, currently utilized for agricultural purposes ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDR00-41-CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 2 (strawberry field). Access to the site wdl be through three drive approaches proposed along 6th Street (Exhibit "B") ANALYSIS A General The protect wdl consist of an 830,000 square foot concrete tdt-up bwldmg with office area The bwldmg will be used for warehouse/distribution activities The bwldmg will be bwit on the vacant 39 96 acres of land The bwldmg has been designed to house one tenant. The bwldmg will be self sufficient with independent access, parking, and utility services Loading docks wdl be provided, as well as, several at-grade loading doors, on the north and south elevations of the bwldmg Finish materials for the bwldmg exterior include sandblast and bwldmg color treatments to create horizontal and vertical visual interest The proposed windows will be treated with blue glazed glass The proposed bwldmg height is identified at 43 feet, which would be compatible with adtacent industrial bwldings B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project at their August 14, and September 4, 2001, meetings (Exhibit "H") The Committee recommended approval of the protect with direction that the applicant provide a 5-foot landscape planter and decorative wall along the south property line and include additional sandblasting treatment to the bwldmg C Grading and Technical Committees The Grading and Technical Committees reviewed the protect on August 14, and 15, 2001, respectively, and recommended approval with conditions D Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00426 The site contains trees along the eastern border including Eucalyptus and Pepper The protect will regwre the removal of approximately 20 mature trees from the site m order to accommodate the proposed development The Landscape Plan identifies a number of trees that wdl replace the existing trees Trees proposed for removal will be replaced with appropriate sized trees m accordance with Cary code E Environmental Assessment Part I of the Irntial Study was completed by the applicant Staff completed Part II of the Irntial Study (Exhibit "I") and the Environmental Checklist Staff determined that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust, and biological resources because of tree removal Mitigation measures wtll be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality and noise impacts to a less than significant impact, and to replace existing trees common to development in Rancho Cucamonga If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be m order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site ~. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCDR00-41-CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST . September 26, 2001 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Development Rewew DRCDR00-41 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conddions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB KC\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" . Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Resolution - Location Map - Site Plan - Grading and Drainage Plan - Floor Plan - Elevations - Landscape Plan - Irntial Study Parts I and II - Design Rewew Committee Minutes dated August 14, and September 14, 2001 of Approval with Conditions for Conditional Use Permit DRCDR00-41 ~~ \\ \v `\ `: a`J \~ 10\ . \ V~'~ ~ d.v~~~ vA~ ~ :A~ V~, .v HAVEN \\~~ A A \~ ~A 1.~~. . ~~L~ ~~. c \ j \`~ '~A , ? VA.. A. ~Ad ~ ~'v \ \ ~ ,i, y \ ~~` \,`.' 1.1i ; l` 111. .,\` \\i ; F, .` . ,.; , ; ; ; , ~ , .:; V P .'~ ~Cvl; ~.'A~ ~V~ /~ CENTER ~ '';1 ;~ ~ --~~ _ Z ~ _-, . \ ~\,: Lam` ~ ~ ~ \ O ; . ' ,` ' ,,~ ., , ~, ; : , ~ Q ., , -• ` ~ ~ ~ _ ~- \ ~ ~ ,1v~ vv ~ l' ~~~~ ~.. ~\vA~i J FiERMOSA i\~~~ ,iii.\~ :t ~y1 ; ~~ `J" . ~~. ~1 ~~ n \. \,~ ~ ~~\`.\t~.i ``:E~\~~~<<~. ~1.i~., .b~\,~.\ . ,.`,iii.\i\`.\`\1 ,`~f`~ `~~~~ ~,.. ~\ l~:`:\i c q \ . ,~~ l\ I •~\~ \ \ 1 1 1 r ~~' ~ u~ " ~ ~~`'~ ~ ~Fy~ N ~~ i ~ ~5 „ .,~„ ~„`' ~ \`-~ ~^~ v + ~ 1 ~ n .,,; --+~ 3. : ~ 7 • O ,~ . , , , \•,, , ,,, ~ ` x; , ;a ,; ; `e,~, „. ` .\.~ ` \ \ . ~ , . ~ ,\ ~~ ,, ~ ~ v, ` w ~ .,~, ~~`V` ~ P w ~ ~: . v ,j, ~', v ii , . ~ vv~~ ,.. v 'A" z~ ,;~ v'~ ~ 4~ ~ w,. i ~ Y n ~, i~ @~~ ~~ - ~e $a _- Ji __ - . - . . - _-_ - . -_ -___. -4~ _ •3A 1' N3A VH ~- -- 71- i -- - - ----- -- -~- -- $ I ~ U W W tl U O 8 O O °n I > ~,\ C w C III I IIJ rl 7\Illlir llr Q ~ c \ o ' a II U 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ I~n Q = IM b ti ~ N oirrl~ll ru O II P•`Ilii~ 0 L g ' i ' I ~' •" Min QJ ~-0-~~~_- ~ - ~~ nl Uliil i'IIC~~llsll I - rvm~a..~ia Ip ~ ~ ~ ' 2 u ~ I w ~ ~ ~ ~o~~ol ~~ ~I Io o~ ~I~~~I~+~Ial~fl+;~rl~ ~i~~ri~~r~lllilii;o l~ ~ ~~ II ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~~l rl~ I r Ilr II li_~~~I ~~~III rl ~ li I I Ira 1'( tl~11~ o o I II II III II~I~T~o o I ill r ` I~r lllU _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ,III , r ° ~ , ~ I~ _ I ~ ~ Ib_x I I I~YY o ~ I ~I I ~~ I ~ ICI ~' I °~ -I- I_ p_~~-~-1 ---U~--~.~~ ~ _ I 1 I 111 L I I I ~ ~ -I-i -- I~-~-~ ~ 41 ~r1 W P ~1 i `~ - - `` ~ _ I ~ I~ ~ I ~, I I~ I I P r ~ r --y w I ~-ate r y t m I I - --- -- I ~ I I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I m _ - _ _ - _ - JWI I I I I I ~~+..4-~4 Jp 1 ~ ar r.r ~ In- - I -t ---I'-I--r-t__ c ~ I t~ ~:r__~-~L': _ W ~ ~ I I` e- - I I I m `° I I I I f -I ~ ~ ~ ~' T C I o C1 8 ci _ 1. W ~ ~ ; V h ~ •r b 2 = O ~ ° :: 4 ~ a m V ~ Q W ~ W h m O m . Y ~- b ~ __ m - r. e _O ~ Q a s ~ r I ( ~~ 1 I ??a I ~___ ~' I ~_- ~~ j ~ I ~~ Sri " -~ i . . i Y~I ~31i IlI I IILi II f I -~ ooud' ~ 1 `' ~U ., i!!I !'! I --~.U' I_~ ~ i I I I I I V I I I I-_ o;-~ , jr~t~r ;, I I I I I I I I ~ I I ~ - i.~ I P ~ ~ r I I" I r Ir I i m ~^ I j-fir Ir I I. I r i t I r I •.' ,, ~l,I I Iei _ 17 I~ r I 4 ~ ~1E "' "i"' I 'I I ~ ~ T_ r 1M ~ ~~ ~.. I i ~ ' , , ..~. . . I I` r ' ------- I -'~------ -----------------•- ------- ii NMYXO 10 bI M00 000IJ 1/xb Yb0 ~~ e00 rIO ~I II ~\I -------------------- ~~J ------------ e~ e ~ ~~~g ~; ~~~ kd GV4V I ~~ 7 Z 211 7 ~,;, ,~, II I f!il I i j j~li,l l j.~l. 1111 ~1lII i i Ill,i i I.. J ~ ' ! II21 ~ IIIiI! 1, .I -- I^ I S I _ e p t !! ~ 6 3S1N3Atl ~_ ~ ~~! li "~' 1~: ~X ~ 6 U e N3AtlH ~ i i ~ ~-, - 4 li I I I I r ~ ~ 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ Q ~,., r ~ ~n~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ 1 ,1 I,I I I1 `I I ._ -1~-___ , ~ I ' 1 1 1 ` 1 ' ~ ' ~\ `\ ' I 1~ 1 I / ~ Z I 1 I ~ ~.fk_3-_ -_g=:=-~_ tai ~ Y ... - ~, IJ1(J~ --~' , II ~ al I ~ , ~I I I ~II~ '~ S~~~j J - / U I .R ) c ~, D ~ ~ d Z ~I I ~ ,n ~`i el~'i .~~~ I I ~ I I I - _ ~ ~~~ W ~ III 6 1 _ _~ ~ _. ~~~ 1 'fi ~ X11 1 F~ J~j ~ 1 -~ I' v aoC` w 1^UI (U~ WD yW= III' g ~ I~~p ~I I --Y r ~., pa< .i~~I i J i ' " r a I '~~1~ _- _-_ --- - I I 1 1 e c -I a- ~ ~ //~ ~ ° n - ~! ~~ a ~ ~ ~ IIF~ ~ i i ~ ~ I V U ='I, I i~~Il?I i;~I I i! I i I I I I I i i 1 i~ I',-! E ,'i I~ I~p Z y l I ~" I ~ [~ , 1 I I ~I, I ~~ II i~ Q 1 I 'i "', ' I I i - ~ i°. I~~ 16.~~ ~~ I r~=-_}~l 1~: ° i i I I I I 1 i I- ~ ~G - __ ~~1 i 1 I I ig~ u~ a 4 I i:e u I I ~} ~~I ~ ~ , ~ e I ~ ' ~ ~~ Sys ~~I i i e I{ II E ~ -- J ~ ~1 ' 1 I I ~~ I h II i ( S 1 I i I I I O1+ ~ ~` i, ~i i I~ ~> 1 , I ~ ~~~ ~" 1~ III s ~ i i ' i 1 ~_r'T, 83 it r~ ~f III~I I'{ I Q y,y 1 1 O ' i I i ~I d 13 z i -}' , ~,~ I I~41~ I i I I, i"~ - I -~T- ., ~, I ~ -~ eels I i~ /4~~'/~ lI ~ I i I 1 I -- ~~I ~I ~ _~~ ap ~ I` ~ ~ ~~ I ~~ t ...`, ~~' ,. I _11 ~a~~'~I '~`~I _.x,.dl V d I~ / i ~ m ~ -II a i ~, _ € /, m ~~= '.. -_.~ .~?_~" ~ ~y_, `. f4~ -llbi7=74W`%1--FCd'_~ly~`Y_~-^ _ ~ .< < ai ea Sa - , - - ~ - - - --- ~ - ~>~ ~ C ~ < <~~ Y ~ e 3fW3Atl tl601Vkf3H ~ „G„ ~~ C~ „D„ Q Q m S' Q Q Q Q Q•~~ ~ Q Q Q Q 1 p ~ ~ ~~ ~ R ~~ ~~ ~ R ~ ~ R ~ R ~ R ~~ ~ R z~ ¢-_ ~ F ~ , i- ¢ ~ 3 cW.f y m ~ 2= ~ O ° m " d ~ 4 ~_ u Q R - i m ~ b Y ~ R C ~ V i ,+4., hm O~ O ~ § Q t ~ h V0 U fi 1 e ~i~E;E~~nl€6 ~~' ai Ei9 a s i ~ 6 ?a F ; 3 s~ ~ ~ i~ ; ig ia,Ea~° t E ! ~ 2~' B 3e Ea s E 9S ~p !., i e ~2i , ~ iy i !. 9 6~~ i ii " Ele i@ ~. ~; 1E E~ 9Ae99'~'~al~''i~ia ~g IE! ! fi , Ee i~ i9 AB !E i 'y 1 [[ i ~`E i ~ 6 E € ~ !~A i ! ! A ii ~li E E A ~ i ~3a+9i~~i 1i ~ Aa!' i A E.B ~€R Be~ !~~ ~~@~;~36i~S gii6:1 ~ii'tS ~AC a~;af€c6i' 000 000 OOCL"*b00 0 „ EN _~ ~ __ V 9 2 ~~ V h ~ °p e ~ oa ~e ~ ~ m W FW- ~ h Q D G ltm CY op h V ~ Ci €3S ~, a~~ ~ la{~1 ~Illii@eFei 1311~~ 3 ao~ooooo0 ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ 4 ~~~ t~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~~9 ~YY e @ @ €@i 3E ~ ~ p ~ a ffaa a~~ @i @ Q ~ MYY Y~gg ro a ? : ,Fkl$ het 6 ~ S {pS ?~s ! , p~ )~r aa~~',@~ ~a~~i~?t maaoo©oo ~~~ ! @@Iz~ld~ il:~ @ k~@.r~k~lA~o ciww o~uuwuu Cb O 4 I I I ~I I hl ~~ I CI ~I a~ i I~ a ,~~..e.,--1------ i 4 4 I ~ 0 . g ~' ' ~ 0 8 ~ ~ I e ~~ I ~~ e ~ =~ i ~ II q IR ,i` f N ~ ___ d~ B R . V 9 ti z' x ~ ~ ° v h ~o xx o ~ ' " m a ~ e m m c W m W - - Q y ~+ a Y ~ Q C ~ V ~ m O ~ O ~ O ~ H Vm V 's t e 0 W m 3 m v h 4 a0. -,. C O m h Y y ~~ J \Cabot Industrial\CDC I II 830K - 256\Deslgn\Consultant\LAND01 dwg, 08/28/2001 01 46 53 PM, al 0` Z I ij i, I -_ ~{~' _ iI1~ a, L -I- L ~l- ~ ~66T~ _ _ 1 I I I I I I I I I I II I I~d ~t~~ ~kI O B C~~ clL 1 _ _: ; ~?:lid"•A" I~ ~ t- s;I d 3t rl ~ I I I I I~I: I Ir t I ~ _ I ' ~ ~:~4_yl a€ _ I I ~ I I T-~ ~I ~r I ~~ O T -~-~-~-~ i -~df I , .;L_I _E ~LJ _ _ _ JL _ 1 S e s ~ j F {--~ } I ~~ I I i I r r f{ i C _ I I I 1 1 1 5i i I I 6 1 6 5 €, I,i~_$ 6 I I I I I - ~ RR~RR _ _ I I I I III I ~ I I ~ TIII - ~ - ~ _ ~ - l~ - ~ - T I I I~ i~ ~ ' m I m y I NOT-A~•}PART I =`~t~t i I ~ ~,~,~ I ~ II II ~ I: I II III' I I ~ I II ~ , ''%~O ~ ti~p~. I '~ 0 ` , ``~ ~ 4+ yI I}~ _}I 1µ_I I;-}I I}_I{_'}I}_I~~_L I}-_ ___-_-__I}__-_-__ --__I}-Vn 1r _ _ __111 1I IIII II~II I~'L I}I~I{IIlµI 1µI II II 'II t111 X11111 _I _IIIIIIIIII 11 ~1,. _~I'~~_I ~IIIIIIIIIII II' II IIII I~ - ~ 1 o I c ~ . .~BI~ u s e ~ elf' CABOT D[Sl ~;~ 829Ku~ FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL -j BUTLER INVESTMENTS j HUNTER LANDSCAPE CENTER ~ zun ulnznwru uuc®I..ec..~ wxn euixuvw~ i a~+c~r..~. vzwr 1 mn+Adxo FLOOD CONTNOL CHANNEL 11 I _ ~ (~,l~ - "'Z~r~ City o/Rancho Cocamimpa Plamm~p Dmsion (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS IMLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note thatrtrs the msponsibilrty ofthe applicant to ensure that the applrcahon rs complete at the time of submittal, Crty staff will not be available to peAOrm work required to prowde missing mformahon • Application Number for the pm/act to which this form pertains DR 001 Pro/act SoulhsMe of 6'" Street between Deer Creek Channel and Haven Avenue Tdle Name & Address of pro/ect owner(s) Cabot D~strtbutan Center m, Cabot Industrial Trust Two Center Plaza, Suite 200 Boston, MA 02 1 08-1 9 06 Name & Address of developer or pro/act sponsor Cabot Industrial Trust and Riversde Commercial Investors 3685 Main Street Riversde, CA 92501 Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothli BNd Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1~~JuQ-~~~ ~-t)~11~Mu2cV1c..I-A1~~~i.~tsS- 1~A~2~oLL _l~~tZL.v12 Contact Person 8 Address Chuck Buquet /Charles Joseph Associates (909)481-1822 10681 Foothill Bivd Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~ it ~~ ~~ • PROJECT INFORMATION 6 DESCRIPTION: 1 Informahon rnd~cated by astensk (') rs not requrrnd of nonconsfruc6on CUPs unless othenwse requested by staff '1) Prowde a full scale (8-1/1 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the pro/ect site, and rnd~cate the site boundanes 2) Provide a set o/color photographs whrch show representative wews into the site from the north, south, east and west wews into and Irom the site from the pnmary access points which serve the site, and reprosentabve wews of significant /eatures /ram the site Include a map showing locahon of each photograph 3) Pro/ect Location (descnbe) Southside of 6'" Street behveen Deer Creek Channel and Haven Avenue 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) 210-072-05,210-072-11,210-072-16, 210-072-17,210-072-05 'S) Gross Srte Area (aclsq tt) 55 13 Acres '8) Net Srte Area (total Srte size minus area of public streets B proposed ded~cabons) 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change whrch would affect the pro/ect site (attach addidonal sheet d necessary None 8)Include a descnphon of alI permits whrch will be necessary ham the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in ortierto fully implement the pro/ect Planning Commission Approval Grading Permits and Budding Permits ~. \2 9)Descnbe the physics! setting of the site as it exists before the protect including rnformahon on topography, soil stabrlrty, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and tads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any exrshng stnrctures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the shuctures Attach photographs of signficant /eatures described In addrhon, site all sources of rnlormation (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biodc and aroheologrcal surveys, treftic studies) The entue site is undeveloped except an exrshng 4,000 square foot metal budding on parcel 210-072-17 The Westerty portion of the balance of site APN# 210-072-06 and APN# 210-072-11 are presently planted with vineyards 10)Descnbe the known cukural and/or historical aspects of the site Srte all sources of informahon (books, published reports and oral history) There are no known srgnficant cultural or hrstoncal aspects [o the site(s) 11)Descnbe any horse souroes and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses None ..1~ 12)Descnbe the proposed profectin detail This should provide an adequate descnption ofthe site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the prosed pro/ect Indicate d there are proposed phases fordevelopment, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anhcipated completion ofeach increment Attach additional sheet(s) i/necessary The development ofindustnal buildings in accordance with the zoning provided form Sub-area 6 This application is for one building of 830,000 square feet 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, including informahon on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, orscenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (rosidential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) North-Interspersed Industnal buildings and undeveloped land South-Industnal and ofTice buildings East-Industnal lots and vacant land West-Deer Creek Channel and undeveloped land (Industnal building proposed) 14)Wi11 the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro~ect~ No The protect will serve to enhance the surrounding general a2a z ~y 15)Ind~cate the type olshort-temr and long-temr nose to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How wUl these nose levels affect ad/acent properties and on-sde uses What methods of soundproofing are pmposed~ Short -Term Normal construction noise that wdl meet applicable standards Long -Term Noise generated will be traffic noise as the faal~ty's intended use rs d~sfnbuhon and wdl meet all applicable standands •16) Indicate proposed 2movals and/orreplacements oJmalun3 orscenrc frees None 17) Indicate any bodes o/water (mcludmg domestic watersupplies) into which the site drams n/a None 18)Indicateexpectedamountofwaterusage (See AttachmentAforusageest~mates) For furtherclanficahon,pleasecontadthe Cucamonga County WaterDrstnct x1987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) N/A Peak use (gaUDay) N/A 6 CommemiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) 1500 Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 3000 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank x Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sandary sewage system ~s proposed indicate expected dally sewage generation (See AttachmentAforusageeshmates) Forfurtherclanficat~on,pleasecontacttheCucamongaCountyWaterDrstndat987-2591 a Residential (ga4day) b CommemraUlnd (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. 20)Numbero/resdentialumts N/A Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot sire N/A Attached (indicate whetherunrts are rental or for sale units) N/A ~~ 21)Antiapated 2nge of sale prices and/orrents N/A Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to 22) Speafy numberof bedrooms by and type N/A 23) Indicate anbapated household srze by and type N/A 24) Indicate the expected numberof school children who will be resrdmg wdhm the protect Contact the appropriate School Distnds • as shown m Attachment B a Elementary WA b JunrorHrgh N/A c Senior High N/A COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) o(commeraa/, mdustnal or msMubonal uses Commeraal and Industrial uses as provided form presentzomng 26) Total floor area of commercial, mdustnal, or msMuhonal uses by type 830,300 square feet \I 27) Indicate hours of operation To be determined 28) Numberof employees Total To be determined Maximum Shdt To be determined Time of Maximum ShAt To be determined 29)Prowde breakdown ofanhapated/ob classficahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate of hire for each classficahon (attach addd~onal sheet rf necessary) To be determined 30) Estimation of the number of wodcers to be hoed that currently reside in the City To be determined '31)For commeroial and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct, at (818) 572-6283) Business operations for undetemm~ed user Knll meet all applicable standards ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine theirabd~ty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ If so, please rnd~cate their response Agencies contacted have indicated their ability to serve the proposed pro/ect r~ LJ \~ 33)In the known history of this preperty, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ • Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB, redioact~ve substances, pesticides and herbicides, luels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any ofthe above Please list the materials and describe theiruse, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates ofuse, riknown No 34)Will the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above I/yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cahon plans No I hereby certrty that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluahon ofthis pm~ect to the best ofmy ability, that the (acts, statements, and information presented are true and corned tot he best o/my knowledge and bel~el l further understand that addrt~onal in/ormahon maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluahon can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date ~ ~ ~ Signature \~ Title ~~'~~~ ~ " l~ ~Q City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM BACKGROUND INITIAL STUDY PART II Project Fde DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 2. Related Files: Industrial Area Specific Plan, SPA 00-02 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 00-41 Cabot Distribution Center III -The proposed protect is the construction and operation of an approximately 830,300 square foot distribution/warehouse bulding consisting of approximately 815,900 square feet of warehouse space and 14,400 of related office space The building wdl be developed on approximately 40 acres of a 55 13-acre site bounded by Sixth Street on the north, the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel on the west and Haven Avenue on the east, inSub-area 6 of the Industrial Districts (APN 210- 072-06, 210-072-16, 210-072-17, 210-072-35) The southern boundary of the site is adtacent to existing office and industrial/manufacturing uses that front Fourth Street The proposed protect represents development of approximately 75 percent of the site The remaining approximately 15 acres, the area fronting Haven Avenue, is not a part of the proposed protect and no development is currently being proposed . As part of the proposed protect, the applicant has requested the deletion of Center Street, south of Sixth Street, from the Industrial Area Currently, Center Street extends southerly from Sixth Street through the center of the protect site The City Traffic Engineer will consider this request m contunction with the whole of the protect Center Street is not a mator roadway and does not currently exist in this location so deletion of the street from the Circulation Plan would not create an adverse affect m the vicinity of the site Center Street was meant to be used as an access between Sixth and Fourth streets With the development of the protect site with one large budding, Center Street will not be necessary as an access road since the budding will be accessible directly from Sixth Street 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Darrell Butler Riverside Commercial Investors 3685 Main Street Riverside, CA 5. General Ptan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park, Industrial District Subarea 6 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is bounded on the north by Sixth Street followed by existing industrial/manufacturing bwldings Haven Avenue borders the site on the east, followed by Haven Bwlding Materials, Inc To the west is the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel, then Hermosa Street The area between the channel and Hermosa Street is vacant but zoned industrial/manufacturing as part of the Industrial Districts Existing office complexes and mdustnal buildings border the site on the south ~~ Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 and include the Friendly Hdls Medical Group This area fronts Fourth Street to the south The surrounding in the vicinity of the protect site are all within the Industnat Distracts area 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kart Coury, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: State Water Resources Control Board - General Construction Actiwties Storm Water Runoff Permit u ~.ZO Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one Impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 (/) Land Use and Planning ()Population and Housing (/) Geological Problems (/) Water (/) Air Quality (/) Transportation/Circulation (/) &ological Resources ()Energy and Mineral Resources ()Hazards (/1 Noise O Public Services ()Utilities and Service Systems (/) Aesthetics ()Cultural Resources ()Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed Na cy Ferg n S for Plann August 31, 2001 T 2\ Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified Potentally Sigmfiwnl ImparA Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unless roan Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incor atetl Im act Im aq 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/) policies adopted by agencies with turisdiction over the protect c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (/) vicinity d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community Comments: a-d) The site is a former vineyard and the portions of the site are still planted with grape vines The site and vicinity are designated Industrial Park and zoned as Subarea 6 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Industrial Districts The designation provides for office development and support administrative services for industrial related activities Currently Subarea 6 allows for light manufacturing, light wholesale, storage and distribution/warehousing The proposed protect, a distribution/warehouse facility with associated office space falls within the permitted uses for Subarea 6 Polenaally Sigmfiwnt Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless Tfian Significant Mibgahon Sigmficani No Im ct Incor aletl Im as Im ad 2. POPULA71ONANDHOUSING. Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed offiaal regional or local O O O (/) population protections b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e g ,through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable O O O (/) housing? City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 T 22 • Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the distribution/warehouse faality may employ an estimated 250 employees including both warehouse and office/clerical positions Employees could work m shifts depending on the ultimate tenant The addition of these employees will not create a demand for additional housing as a matonty of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities Rancho Cucamonga and the other cities in the west end of San Bernardino County have long been considered housing-rich as employees in LA and Orange counties moved east and north looking for more affordable housing As LA and Orange counties have become saturated with development, employers are seeking opportunities to locate office and industrial/manufacturing uses in San Bernardino County With development of this and other similar protects, the west end of the County is reaching a balance between lobs and housing thus achieving one of SCAG's major goals for the sub-region c) The western, southern and some eastern portions of the site are presently planted with vineyards (APN 210-072-06 and 210-072-11) With the exception of an existing 4,000 square foot metal bwlding on the northwest corner of the site (APN 210-072- 17) the site is undeveloped with no existing housing located onsite or within the general vianity The proposed protect will not displace housing as the sde is zoned Industrial Park and is not proposed for future housing developments PplenUalty Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inver ate0 Im act Im at% 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEIIAS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving a) Fault ruptures () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shakmg~ O O (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, mcludmg hquefacUon~ O O O (/) d) Seiche hazards () () () (/) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (/) h) Expansive sods O O O (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (/) ~.-. 2 3 Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hilt Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 2 5 miles north and west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 8 miles northwest The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude (M„,) 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of produang up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 12 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 13 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Budding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant d) The site is not located near a body of water e) The site is relatively flat and is located in a developed industrial area adtacent to the Deer Creek Channel, a concrete lined flood control channel The site is not susceptible to landslides or mudflows f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the protect as the site is currently vacant Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer The impact is not considered significant as the site is relatively flat with minimal grading required g-h) A Geotechnical Report prepared for the protect site by Earth Consultants, Inc determined that soil types onsite consist of Tutunga loam across the northern and eastern portions of the site, and soils with characteristics intermediate between those described for Tutunga loam and Delhi sand are present along the southeastern portion of the site The report did not identify soil profiles with overall characteristics of Delhi sod Soils present onsite are excessively drained, readily level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans Runoff is very slow, and hazard of erosion is slight The potential for soil erosion and sediment transport to occur during grading and construction can be controlled through implementation of standard Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that must be prepared by the applicant in order to obtain the necessary permits from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Standard construction BMPs may include but are not limited to 1) spraying the site with water or other palliative periodically throughout the day to control wind erosion, 2) plaang sandbags along the downstream side of the site to prevent sediment transport into the channel, and 3) having sod stabilization sediment control materials on-site during grading and construction to adequately protect soil-disturbed areas before the onset of precipitation These and other measures included in a SWPPP will ensure that erosion and sediment transport will be minimized Therefore, no mitigation measures are required i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features ~ 2y Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 PolenOally Signifiwnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polentully un° ss Than Signifiwm Maigauon Sigmficanl No Im ad Incor atetl Im acl Im q 4. WATER. Wdl the proposal result m a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/) hazards such as floodmg~ c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes m the amount of surface water in any () () () (/) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an agwfer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (/) i) Substantial reduction m the amount of O O O (/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) The prolect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape proposed on a site currently used for agncultural purposes All runoff wdl be conveyed to drainage facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows and must be approved by the City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Also see Comment 3g-h above for a discussion of erosion and sediment control during construction activities The impacts assoaated with development of the site are not considered significant after regulatory regwrements and conditions of approval the City will impose have been met b) The western most portion of the site is located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated on Figure III-G/2 "Flood Hazards" in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR The City has adopted standards for flood protection related to mirnmum building elevations and flood proofing Drainage and flood protection facilities will be provided for the prolect to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) S 25 Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water The Deer Creek Flood Control Channel borders the site on the west, and contains water intermittently generally during heavy storms The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how stormwater runoff wdl be conveyed both during grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied, pnor to issuance of a grading permit f-i) The protect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area because the site is not used for groundwater recharge Polenaally $ignifiwnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially a Pess ina~ Sigmfiwnl Mmgation Significant No Impact Inver atetl Im act Im aq 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to poilutants~ () (/) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (/) cause any change in climate d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed protect was screened using Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the gwdance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Distnct, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnct, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The cntena pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Two of these, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursers Default values were used where protect speafic information was unavailable Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6"' edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model In order to reflect the purely warehouse nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of medwm to heavy duty diesel trucks 2 ZLP • n ~~ Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) u Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Gradin 3 75 3 75 50 02 47 52 - - 24 64 17 91 Worker Tn s 2 86 2 86 4 O5 4 05 7 67 7 67 0 78 0 78 Stationa E ui 0 34 0 34 0 27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E w 8 84 8 84 3 31 3 31 - - 0 45 0 45 Arch Coatin s 57 75 54 86 - - - - - - As halt 2 62 2 49 - - - - - - Totals 79 15 75 79 74 00 70 68 7 67 7 67 30 05 23 11 SCAQMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si mficance Yes No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NO. CO PM~o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Md Area Source 0 40 0 40 5 54 5 54 2 21 2 20 0 01 0 01 Mobile Source 59 55 59 52 50 73 50 70 394 48 394 20 22 52 22 51 Totals 59 95 59 92 56 27 56 24 396 69 396 40 22 53 22 52 SCAQMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si mficance Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equpment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO, and PM,o levels m the area As shown in Table 1, vwth implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, construction activties wtll not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during grading activities for PM,o and NOx However, architectural coating (painting) will exceed the SCAQMD threshold for ROGs, without the appropriate mitigation Generally only the exterior walls of warehouses are painted Interior walls are constructed of concrete and do not regwre a protective layer of paint The URBEMIS7G model calculates total surface area to be painted based on total bwlding square footage The model does not distinguish surfaces that will not be painting Therefore ROG emissions estimated from painted activities wtll be signficantly less than protected Mitigation measures contained in this section wtll ensure impacts are less than significant ..t-- 2r} Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 As shown in Table 2, developed conditions (operational impacts) will exceed SCAQMD thresholds for ROG and NO^ by approximately seven percent or four pounds per day Additional mitigation measures to reduce emissions further are as follows 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3. Haven Avenue and 6th Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 5. Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 6. Contractor shall utilize pre-coated natural colored building materials, water-based or low-VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with a high transfer efficency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coating applications such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag or sponge. 7. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 8. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. In addition, emissions over the SCAQMD thresholds for operations can be reduced through ndesharing or use of mass transit, and by offering food service on-site to reduce employee taps The success of the following measures wdl reduce impacts to air quality to less than significant 10. The applicant shall provide incentives to use mass transit and carpools as determined by City staff. 11. The applicant shall designate preferential parking for carpools and vanpools and establish a vanpool system for employees. T 28 n ~~ Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 12. The applicant shall incorporate food service into the design of the project to reduce employee trips at lunch time. b-d) There are no sensitive receptors in the area The proposed protect is the construction of a distribution/warehouse building on 55 13 acres within Subarea 6, of the Industrial Districts The end use of the proposed protect, industrial warehouse and distribution, will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or obtectionable odors Poleneally Sigmficanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenlially UnPess Than Sigmficant Miligahon Sigmfcant No Im act Incor ateE Im act Im aq 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () (/) ( ) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capaaty on-site or off-sites () () () (/) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists O O O (/) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting O O O (/) alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rail or air traffic impacts () () () (/) Comments: a) The Cabot Distribution Center consists of approximately 830,300 square feet of distribution/warehousing, including 14,400 square feet of related office space Access is proposed via four driveways on Sixth Street Truck ingress-egress would be allowed at the outer two driveways (east and west) with the center two driveways reserved for employee and guest parking so there would be no mixing of passenger vehicles and tractor/traders The Traffic Study prepared for the protect included a larger development area including 54,000 square feet of office space in two additional buildings Since the completion of the study (January 2001) the applicant has decided not to pursue the office buildings and instead propose only the distribution/warehouse bwlding Therefore, the traffic numbers used to evaluate the protect reflect both uses and will be higher than actual traffic trips generated by the proposed protect (warehouse only) Z 2`~ Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Under existing traffic conditions, the four study intersections that would be affected by the propose protect are currently operating at Level of Service D (LOS D) or better during both peak hours with the exception of Haven Avenue at Fourth Street which operates at LOS E during the afternoon peak hour The Cabot Distribution Center would generate an additional 2,107 daily trips (1,123 passenger taps and 984 truck trips) Durng the morning peak hours, the protect would generate 87 passenger vehicle trips and 57 truck taps During afternoon peak hour, the protect would generate 142 trips (116 passenger vehicle taps and 26 truck trips) The traffic study showed that the four study area intersections would continue to operate at LOS D during both peak hours with the addition of protect traffic to existing traffic condtions with the exception of the intersection of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street This intersection would continue to operate at LOS E durng the afternoon peak hour with the protect The addition of the protect trips to the afternoon peak hour traffic, there would be an increase in delay of traffic of 1 5 seconds This is also true under future year 2020 traffic conditions The protect site is part of the larger Industral Distracts chapter, of the Development Code The City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation In addition, the protect is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site, employee/wsitor parking on-site, and large truck access Compliance with conditions of approval will ensure that protect-related taps are less than significant A letter from the applicant to the City discussed potential truck traffic noise impacts to the office complex by primary use of Center Street As part of the proposed protect, the applicant has requested the deletion of Center Street, south Sixth Street from the Industrial Area Currently, Center Street extends southerly from Sixth Street through the center of the protect site The City Traffic Engineer will consider this request in contunction with the whole of the protect Center Street is not a mator roadway and does not currently exist in this location so deletion of the street from the Circulation Plan would not create an adverse affect in the vicinity of the site Center Street was meant to be used as an access road to larger Sixth and Fourth streets With the development of the protect site with one large budding, Center Street wdl not be necessary as an access road since the building wdl be accessible directly from Sixth Street b-d) The site is a rectangular parcel with and four proposed entries along Sixth Street There are set backs for each entry so visitors to the site wdl not back up into the street Access for emergency vehicles wdl be provided by all driveways Sufficient parking (285 passenger vehicle spaces) is provided along the front (Sixth Street) and east side of the bwlding Adequate trader parking is provided on the north and south sides of the bulding adtacent to the loading docks • J~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 13 e-f) The City has established a series of trails throughout the City along existing streets and through residential neighborhoods There are no trails associated with the protect site and the Industrial Districts area is not an area conducive to pedestrian use The proposed protect will not interfere with local or regional bus service and, although no bicycle racks are proposed as part of the protect, they could be installed if interest is generated among employees g) Located two and a half miles from Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft Potentially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentally Unless Tfian S~gnifiwnl Mit~gaUOn Significant No Im d Inca aced Im act Im aq BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (/) habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated species (e g ,heritage trees, () () () (/) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () () (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (/) vernal pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corndors~ O O O (/) Comments: a) The western, southern and some eastern portions of the site are used for cultivating vineyards Based on a map prepared by the U S Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS) the site occurs within an area designated as the Ontario Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (DSF) (Figure 6 of the USFWS Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly) Aside from the vineyard, the site is dominated by non-native plant species A site survey was conducted by Impact Sciences to evaluate potential occurrence of the DSF The report concluded that the subject property does not support characteristics consistent with DSF habitat due in part to the site's historic and ongoing exposure to agricultural activities Additionally, appropriate soil type and plants are not present onsite and therefore the DSF is not expected to occur onsite b-c) The site contains trees along the eastern border including eucalyptus and pepper Appropriate permits must be obtained prior to removal at such time as that portion of the site is proposed for development Trees proposed for removal will be replaced with appropriate sized trees in accordance with City code d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site T~\ n U Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 e) The site is bordered on the north by Sixth Street and on the east by Haven Avenue Intermittent industrial development to the south and north and existing agricultural activities that exist onsite has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past Potentially Signifiwnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially un°esa nay Sigmficent MnigaUOn Sgmficant No Im as Incor atee lm act Im act 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a-b) The protect will be regwred to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation c) The protect site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2) An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization Potentially Sign~icant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenlully unless Ttian Sigmfiwnt MmgaUOn 9gmficant No Im p Incor attic Im atl Im aq 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of acadental explosion or release of () ( ) () (/) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () ( ) () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () ( ) () (/) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () ( ) () (/) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () ( ) () (/) brush, grass, or trees _ "3 Z Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 15 Comments• a/c/d) Based on the existing agricultural use of the site, hazardous materials are not likely present Recent visits to the site did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials A portion of the site along the eastern border is currently used to store farm egwpment It is likely that pesticdes are currently used onsite, however the site is relatively small 55 13 acres and only a portion of it is used for agricultural activities Therefore the quantity of pesticides being used is small and will dissipate once agricultural activities cease Section 5 of this Irntial Study presents mitigation measures for controlling dust emissions dunng construction activities These measures will ensure that contact with pesticides, that may potentially be present in soils onsite, is minimized Additional measures are not proposed b) The proposed protect will prodde adequate entries to the site, including four driveways, to allow for emergency response assistance and/or evacuation e) The western, southern and some eastern portions of the site are currently planted with vineyards and the northwest corner of the site includes a 4,000 SF metal building The existing budding will be demolished in-place in accordance with City standards The site wdl be graded and landscaped in accordance with approved plans to minimize potential fire hazards The protect will not increase fire hazards within the area ~-~ L~ Potenpally Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources y Potentiall Unless Than 9gnifiwnt Mrtigahon Significant No Im ad Incur aced Im act Im act 10. NOISE. Wtll the proposal result m a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed protect may produce noticeable protect-related noise as the site's proposed construction and end use includes truck traffic The protect would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area. However, the site is designated Industnal Park Subarea 6 of the Industrial Districts which allows medium industrial, warehousing and distribution as approved by the City on August 16, 2000 Impacts to office complexes south of the protect site will be less than significant Z J3 Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Potenbaliy Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenbaliy Unless Tfian Significant MM1igabon Significant No Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? O O O (/) e) Other governmental services () () () (/) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The site, located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street in Rancho Cucamonga, is served by a fire station located on the southwest corner of Jersey and Milliken, approximately 3 5 miles from the protect site Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur Police Protection -Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the distribution/warehouse building will not change current business hours within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled Schools -The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant Parks -Proposed construction activities and warehouse operations will not generate a number of new fobs in the area but will not likely induce people to move to the protect area because of the size of the local labor force that currently commutes out of the area for work Employees will likely be hired from the local labor pool so the protect will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities Public Facilities -The proposed protect wdl utd¢e existing public faahties and wdl be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Districts of the Development Code z 3y Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 • Potentially Sgmfiwnl T Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially ones pan Significant Mrtigauon Significant No Im act Incur aletl Im act Im act 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the prop osal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utd~t~es a) Power or natural gasp () () () (/) b) Communication systems () () () (/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distnbuUon O O O (/) faahties~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (/) e) Storm water drainages O O (/) ( ) f) Solid waste disposals () () () (/) g) Local or regional water supphes~ O O O (/) Comments: a-g) The protect will use existing gas, electrical and communication systems Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill The protect will increase demand upon storm dram systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the currently vacant site Storm drain improvements will be necessary to accommodate the protect This does not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage The impact is not considered significant since it can be mitigated by providing proper stormwater drainage per the City Engineer Potentially Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unless Tfian Significant MM1igaOan Sgmficant No Im act Incur ateE Im act Impact 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () (/) ( ) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (/) c) Create light or glares () () (/) ( ) Comments• a) The east portion of the site lies within the Haven Avenue Overlay District Haven Avenue is considered a gateway into Rancho Cucamonga and calls for restrictive development policies, design standards and land use regulations Haven Avenue as a major travel route for the City, encourages intensive, high quality office and professional development The proposed protect does not included development of the eastern approximately 25 percent of the protect site, that area of the site along Haven Avenue ~ 35 Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 There will be no vehicular access from Haven Four driveways along Sixth Street will be used to access the site The protect will include a minimum 45-foot wide, seven-foot high landscaped berm setback along Sixth Street which will separate the parking lots from the street b) The proposed protect is located in an area designated Industrial Park and proposed uses will be consistent with the goals and obtectives set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Districts The proposed design and exterior elements of the industrial budding will be consistent with design standards set forth in the approved plan c) The protect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards The impact is not considered significant PolenOally SlgnlfiWnt Impact Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polannally unleaa Tnan Significant MM1igaaon Sgnificant No Im an Incur area Im ct Im act 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb Paleontological resources O O O (/) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (/) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses within O O O (/) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The site is approximately 55 13 acres and is east and adtacent to Deer Creek Flood Control Channel The property has been disturbed from existing agriculture use so the likelihood of unearthing cultural resources is minimal and impacts are considered less than significant Potenaally Significant Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially unless Tfian Sigmfiwnt Mitigation Significant No Im ap Incur area Im act Im atl 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () (/) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities () () () (/) J- ~~p Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 Page 19 Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely as a majority of the employees wdl likely be hired from the local labor force, within Rancho Cucamonga or adjacent cities where recreational facilities are planned to support the population The proposed protect is not antiapated to generate the need for additional housing which in turn would generate the need for additional recreational space b) The proposed pro/ect does not affect existing recreational opportunities as the site is located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street within an area designated Industrial Park Surrounding property is either developed or proposed for development r1 LJ Potentially Sigmficant P Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unl ess Tnzn Sigmficam Miligabon Significant No Im act Incor atetl Im act Im q 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of Cahforma history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) (/) (/) (/) T 3'~- Initial Study for DR 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenl~ally UnPeu Than Sigmfiwnt MM1igahon Significant No Im act Incor rale0 Im act Im act d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) No significant adverse impacts to biological resources will occur with development of the proposed protect The malonty of the site is an actively cultivated vineyard with an overall vegetative cover of 40 to 50 percent Based on a map prepared by the USFWS the site occurs within an area designated as the Ontano Recovery Unit for the DSF (Figure 6 of the USFWS Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly) Aside from the vineyard, the site is dominated by non-native plant speaes A site survey was conducted by Impact Saences to evaluate potential occurrence of the DSF The report concluded that the subfect property did not support characteristics consistent with DSF habitat due in part to the site's historic and ongoing exposure to agricultural activities Appropriate plants and sod type are not present onsite and therefore the DSF is not expected to occur onsite b) The 55 13-acre site could generate significant amounts of fugitive dust during site grading The contractor will be required to minimize dust generation through water applications per the City's standard conditions of approval Additional mitigation measures presented m Section 5 of this Initial Study wdl reduce impacts to less than significant Noise associated with site construction will not result in an impact as there are no sensitive receptors within the area c) Cumulative effects of developing the site with a 830,300 square foot bwldmg may include increased traffic within the immediate vicinity However the impacts are not considered significant as the site plan includes set backs to mitigate potential back up into the street The applicant will be required to pay appropriate transportation fees established for development within the Industrial Distracts Fees are used to make roadway improvements with the area to keep the circulation system at acceptable levels of service d) Development of the distribution/warehouse building would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study did not identify any impacts that would have a potentially significant affect to the environment .~. ~~ Irntial Study for . DRC 00-41/DRC 2001-00534 EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply)• (/) General Plan EIR (Certfied Apnl 6, 1981) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH No 88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Draft General Plan (June 2001) (/) Draft Environmental Impact Report for the 2001 General Plan . (SCH No. 2000061027, June 2001) (/) Industnal Area Speatic Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (/) US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (Prepared September 14, 1997) ADDITIONAL REPORT AND SURVEYS (/) Impact Saences, Results of a Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Habitat-Based Evaluation, June 30, 2000. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described m this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no sigrnficant environmental effects would occur Signature.•~• ~!C~~ Date: ~`t"'~ Pnnt Name and Title: ~e~.~L J~ l 1-~ ~ ~sv~~s~ar~ T 3~1 City of Rancho Cucamonga . NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the CalKomra Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review DRCDR00-41 Public Review Penod Closes: September 26, 2001 Project Name: Cabot Distnbution Center III Project Applicant: Cabot Industnal Trust Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the south side of 6th Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues - APN 210-072-06, 11, 16, 17, and 35 Project Description: The development of an 830,000 square foot Industnal building on 39 96 acres of land in the Industrial Park Distnct (Subarea 6) Related Fdes Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00534, Industnal Area Specific Plan Amendment 00-02, and Tree Removal Permd DRC2001-00394 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the pro/ect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The projectf"ile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. September 26.2001 Date of Determination r1 Adopted By Zy® DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 50 p m Kart Coury August 14, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-41 -CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST -The development of an 830,000 square foot industrial budding on 39 96 acres of land m the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), located on the south side of 6th Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues - APN 210-072-06, 11, 16, 17, and 35 Related files Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 00-02, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00394 Desion Parameters The site is located on the south side of 6th Street approximately 490 feet west of Haven Avenue The site is generally flat with a slight slope to the south The entire site is undeveloped except an existing 4,000 square foot metal bwldmg on Parcel 210-072-17 The westerly portion of the site is presently planted with vineyards Single tenant industrial buldings surround the property on the north, east, and south The Parcel immediately west of the site is also vacant, currently utilized for agricultural purposes (strawberry field) Access to the site will be through three drive approaches proposed along 6th Street. The protect will consist of an 830,000 square foot concrete tilt-up bwldmg with office area The bwldmg will be used for warehouse/distribution activities The building will be built on the vacant 39 96 acres of land The bwldmg has been designed to house one tenant The budding will be self suffiaent with independent access, parking, and utility services Loading docks will be provided, as well as, several at grade loading doors, on the north and south elevations of the building. Finish materials for the budding exterior include sandblast and budding color treatments to create horizontal and vertical visual interest The proposed windows will be treated with blue glazed glass. The proposed building height is identified at 43 feet, which would be compatible with adtacent industrial buildings Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 Provide stronger horizontal elements (i.e. cornice treatment) at each corner of the building and at mid-bwldmg tempered glass treated areas In addition, the parapet could be extended above main bwldmg (i a additional 2 feet) at said areas 2 Add accent treatments to the proposed elevations to provide additional visual interest to proposed budding Increase architectural enhancements along north and east elevations 3. Include a minimum 5-foot landscaped planter along the south property Ime Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 If possible, incorporate vineyards into the landscaped area proposed immediately west of the "Not-A-Part" parcel located on the south side of 6th Street, central to the proposed protect Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the protect subtect to the modifications as recommended above /l~ ~~ ~~` DRC COMMENTS DR DRCDR00-41 -CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST August 14, 2001 Page 2 Design Review Committee Action• Members Present. Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Kart Coury The Committee directed the applicant to revise the plans as following 1 Provide a minimum 5-foot landscaped planter along the south property line 2 Provide a wall on top of a berm or a combination wall alternative (i e. decorative masonry with wrought iron) to screen trucks along the south property line 3 Enhance painted rectangles on bwlding (i a texture) or incorporate sandblasting material. r1, j yZ • CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 700pm Kart Court September 4, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-41 -CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST -The development of an 830,000 square foot Industnal bwlding on 39 96 acres of land in the Industnal Park Distract (Subrea 6), located on the south side of 6th Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues - APN 210-072-06, 11, 16, 17 and 35 Related Files Industnal Area Speafic Plan Amendment 00-02, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00394 Design Review Committee Action Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Dan Coleman Staff Planner Kirt Coury The applicant made the revisions per the Committee's direction 'T ~l3 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRCDR00-41 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 830,000 SQUARE FEET OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON 39 96 ACRES OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 6TH STREET BETWEEN HAVEN AND HERMOSA AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 210-072-06, 11, 16, 17, and 35 A Rentals 1 Cabot Industnal Trust filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRCDR00-41, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Rewew request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and con•ect 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September 26, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to the development of an 830,000 square foot industrial building on 39 96 acres of land m the Industnal Park District, located on the south side of 6th Street between Haven and Hermosa Avenues, and b The properties to the north and south are developed with mdustnal warehouse buildings, the property to the west is currently being constructed with an mdustnal bwldmg, and the property to the east is a vacant parcel currently utilized for agricultural purposes (strawbeny field), and c The application contemplates the development of an 830,000 square foot mdustnal building on property owned by the applicant, and d The protect, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and e The protect will provide warehousing/distribution fanlities of substantial size conveniently located relative to the Industnal area and regional nrculation routes ~ ~y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRCDR00-41-CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and mfonnation contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows • a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaration and Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the mfortnation provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) Light fixtures shall be constructed at a maximum height of 15 feet (to include pedestal), and shall be shielded and directed away from residential areas A detailed Lighting Plan, including a photometnc 1~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRCDR00-41-CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 3 diagram, shall be prepared pnor to issuance of building permits to provide proper shielding of light sources from adtoining properties 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Bwiding Code, or any other City Ordinances 3) No wall shall exceed an exposed height of 8 feet as viewed from adtacent properties and streets 4) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall regwre review and approval by the City Planner, pnor to installation 5) All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debns and maintained in a healthy growing condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and tnmming 6) All egwpment, both ground and roof-mounted, shall be completely screened and architecturally compatible with the elevation design from view of surrounding properties and public nghts-of-way Engineennsa Diwsion 1) Provide full street improvements along 6th Street frontage to Haven Avenue, in accordance with City of Rancho Cucamonga Standards, including, but not limited to, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, dnve approaches, streetlights, street trees, signings, stnpings, and as regwred 6th Street is a "Second Artenal " 2) Provide full curbs and gutters on the south side of 6th Street to Haven Avenue and align with east side of intersection, as required 3) Provide eastbound nght-tum lane at Haven Avenue 4) Improvements installed across APN 210-072-16 and 42 are eligible for reimbursement If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall tenrnnate 5) Obtain nght-of-way and prowde a standard City cul-de-sac for the westerly terminus of Trademark 6) The developer shall pay one-half in lieu fee for the cost of future undergrounding overhead utilities on 6th Street (opposite side of the protect) and also to reimburse Ancal Properties, Inc the electncal undergrounding per DR86-07/UR-02 for the amount of $15,120 (undergrounding on the north side of 6th Street), consistent with City policy 7) The existing telecommunication lines along 6th Street frontage shall be undergrounded The developer may request a reimbursement Z y~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRCDR00-41-CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 4 agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the Cdy, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 8) Obtain all necessary off-site drainage easements 9) Submit a drainage report to substantiate compliance with the City's Master Plan of drainage boundary Install improvements as regwred by the City Engineer 10) Vacate the portion on Center Street north of Trademark that is no longer needed Remove infrastructure improvements and regrade, level to adtacent property Also coordinate with utility companies on abandonment or establishing utility easements Reestablish property line Penang 11) Process Development Code plan amendment for the deletion of Center Street from Subarea 6 of the Industrial District 12) Install street trees per street tree list attached Environmental Mitioation Measures • Aii Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Haven Avenue and 6th Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the sile during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 5) Contractor shall utilize pre-coated natural colored budding materials, water-based or low-VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equpment with a high transfer effiaency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coating applia3tions such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge • 6) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy effiaency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans Z '-l'~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRCDR00-41-CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST September 26, 2001 Page 5 include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers specifications 7) The contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction gradrng plans include a statement that work crews will shut of equipment when not m use 9) The applicant shall provide incentives to use mass transit and carpools as determined by City staff 10) The applicant shall designate preferential parking for carpools and vanpools, and establish a vanpool system for employees 11) The applicant shall incorporate food service into the design of the protect to reduce employee tnps at lunchtime The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~-1 l.J ~y~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRCDR00-41 (CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST) This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. 3 The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect fde with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 L `1 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 • 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained If technical expertise beyond the City staff's Is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mltlgatlon activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible Clty department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure Is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact Issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are Implemented. 8 Any conditions (mltlgatlon) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessaryfunds (or other forms of guarantee) with the Clty. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mltlgatlon measure for the required period of time. 9 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mltlgatlon actlvltles at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEQAwIMP FORM WPD S 50 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Development Revlew DRCDR00-41 Applicant: Rroerside Commercial Investors Initial Study Prepared by: Nancv Ferguson Date: Auaust 31.2001 H ~ . Atr duality ._- ;~~=` ~ ' =` ; ' ~`°~ ~ "~ ;?: s ' ~~,_ - ~ _ r ~,~:~ ~~;~,4~-' ~C~>' ,. ,,. ,~~n;~t~~„ ~a .. ~~ ,~, a,,,. ~, Th t h e si e s all be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent daily to reduce PM,o emissions CP C Review of plans A/C 2 Haven Avenue and 6th Street shall be swept to CP C Review of plans A/C reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle 2 tracking off-site Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CP C Review of plans A/C 2 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Chemical soil stabilizers shall be applied to all inactive CP C Review of plans A/C 2 construction areas to reduce PM,o emissions Contractor shall utilize pre-coated natural colored CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 bwlding materials, water-based or low-VOC coating, and high transfer efficiency application or manual coating application The contractor shall select equpment based on low CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 emission factors and high-energy efficiency Contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative CP B/C Review of plans A/C 2 fuels where feasible Contractor shall ensure that work crews will shut off CP C Review of plans A/C 2 equipment when not in use Applicant shall provide incentroes to use mass transit CP C Review of plans A/C 2 and carpools as determined by City staff The applicant shall designate preferential parking for CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2 carpools and vanpools and establish a vanpool system for employees Applicant shall incorporate food service into the CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2 design of the protect to reduce employee trips at lunch time Key to Checklist Abbreviations ! ! R@SpOnsible P8r800 ~ Monftortng Fret{uency„ , , Method of Verificetlon - ~~~ , ,;, , a~„=' Sarictlons - CDD -Community Development Duector A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Flnal Map CP -Cary Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -Cary Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 - W rthhold Certrficate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds fC - Fre Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEOAVv1MCHKLST WPD (1 ,n`1 V N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENI~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-41 SUBJECT: 830,000 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING APPLICANT: CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF 6TH STREET BETWEEN HAVEN AND HERMOSA AVENUES ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Coin lehon Dat 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its _I_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or Clty Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard _/_/_ Conditions, shall be included In legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and Irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which Include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on ftle in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Industrial Park District sc-oa-o, , T S 3 Protect No DRCDR00-41 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business actmty being commenced thereon, all Conditions • of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldtngs shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bwldtng elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 5 Ail site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compltance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are requred and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 12 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtotning property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 13 The Master Plan is approved in concept only Future development for (each budding pad/parcel) shall be subtect to separate DevelopmenUDesign Review process for Planning Commission approval D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans -//. -/-/. -/-/. -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-04-01 2 ~ ~~ Prgect No DRCDR00-41 Comolehon Date 2 For commeraal and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Ail parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _I_/_ a bulding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho _/_/_ Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office faalities with 25 or more _1_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commeraal and office facilities with 25 or mare _/_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet 7 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commeraal, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/~ residential protects or more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the requred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 8 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/_ commeraal, office, and industrial faalities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet F. Trip Reduction 1 Shower faality accessible to both men and women shall be provided for persons walking or _/_/_ bicycling to work for each protect which meets the following thresholds commeraal 250,000 square feet Industrial 325,000 square feet Office 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels 250 rooms SC-04-01 3 ~ ~ S Prgect No DRCDR00~1 Completion Date G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwiding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be speamen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, suffiaent to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more In vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included In the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Dlwsion 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 10 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to Issuance of bwlding permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 11 Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xenscape as defined m Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municpal Code i H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~ -~-~- -~-~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~ -~-~- -~-~. -~~- -~-~- SC-04-01 4 ~~~ Protect No DRCDR00-41 Completion Date retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _I_/_ of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Division L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Bwlding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts SC-04-01 5 ~ ~~ Proiecl No DRCDR00-41 Completion Date 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Drnsion prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding Offiaal, after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) 6 The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area a Provide a reduced site plan (8'/:" x 11") which indicates the non-buildable easement b Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of aNon-Buildable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s) c Sample document is available from the Building and Safety Dmsion M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s) 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions 4 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of building permits 5 Prowde draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 8 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906 9 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed N. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Bulding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work .3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check SC-04-01 6 ~ c./V -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- Project No DRCDR00-41 Comolehon Date 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on 6th Street Additional RM/ at Haven Avenue Intersection 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards P. Street Improvements 1 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Troll Island Trad 6th Street X X X X X X b Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided far this item 2 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer / / _I_/~ -/_/. -//- / / -/-/- • / / / / I / / / • SC-04-01 7 Prgect No DRCDR00-41 Comolehon Date Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer 3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Ctty Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 4 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 3 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work withrn its right-of-way 4 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel mcluding sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects SC-04-01 8 T ~O -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -// // //. -/-/- //- -/-/- Pro~ecl No DRCDR00-41 Comolehon Date T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Permits shall be obtained from the following agenaes for work within their right-of-way San / /~ Bernardino County Flood Control District _ _ 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / / new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to _ _ _ building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Community Facilities Districts 1 This protect is subtect to the regwrements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District _/_/_ V. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of / / all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fve District and the Water District _ _ _ 2 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, / / specfications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and _ _ _ approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract standards 3 Fire flow requirements for this protect shall be 4~ gallons per minute at a minimum residual / / pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as _ _ amended The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any / / combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District _ _ _ personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 5 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any _/_/_ combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fire Construction Services representatroe shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bulder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be _/_/_ conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The budder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan _/_/_ submitted for review and approval Include main size S Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 9 Required Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance _/_/_ of the building permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance SC-04-01 9 ~' ~ \ Protect No DRCDR00-41 Completion Date 10 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective / / pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with _ _ _ • Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner W. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire _/_I flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection _ Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be required in each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow X. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fire _/ / sprinkler system _ 2 Any modification or remodel to a fire sprinkler system requves Fire Distract approval, and a _/_/_ permit NO WORK is permitted without a permit issued by Fire Construction Services 3 All commeraal structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an _/_/_ occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (FPS), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 4 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire _/_/_ sprinkler system to the Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Distract permit 5 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested _/_/ and accepted by the Fire District _ 6 The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately _/_/_ following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupances Y. Fire Access 1 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and _/_/ obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in _ consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise requred Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Droision 2 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be _/_/_ submitted prior to final bulding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information • 3 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's _/_/ approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fire District access roadways/driveways _ SC-04-01 10 Prgect No DRCDR00-41 Comolehon Date 4 Gated or restricted access requires the installation of a Knox rapid entry system Vehicle access _/_/_ gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch Additionally for vehicle access gates, an approved, compatible traffic signal preemption device will be required to open the • gate The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information 5 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches _/_/_ from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 6 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a _I_/_ minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 7 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from _I_/_ the Fire District for fire lanes on regwred Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DisVict at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 8 Prior to the issuance of any Certficete of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance _/_/_ with the approved fire lane plan The CCBR's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes 9 New buildings other than dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on _/_/_ conVasting background, visible from the sVeet and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Z. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Reqwred Note Pnor to the issuance of a bulding permit for combustible construction, the bwlder _/_/_ shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site AA. Building Use Letter 1 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended _/_/_ use for each building on-site to the Fire Distnct for review and approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for the form BB. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a bulding permit, whichever _/_/_ occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal CC. Fire Alarm System 1 An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use _/_/_ or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard . SC-04-01 11 ~ ~'3 Protect No DRCDR00-01 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District pennit 3 Prior to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire District approval and a permit are requred Plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Fire District 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire District DD. Fees 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows'" $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new bwiding) for New Commercial and Industrial Development ""Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans EE. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life or property b High piled combustible storage FF. Hazardous Materials 1 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 2 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated 3 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount 4 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount 5 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 See Appendix B of this gwde for an alphabetical list of EHS's 6 Any business subtect to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade regwrements To get more information on EPCRA regwrements call / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / /_/ SC-04-01 12 ~ (,~1 I Pro)ec t No DRCDR00-41 Completion Date 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agenaes Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement, however, EPCRA does regwre full annual inventory . submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory 7 Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of _/_/_ 10 CFR 8 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not _/_/_ be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance 9 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is _/_/_ regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner 10 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information _/_/_ regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be regwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs GG. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bulding, _/_/_ Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any _/_/_ consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a Califomia Registered Professional Civil Engineer HH. Other Requirements/Comments 1 NOTE Prior to Planning Diwsion approval the applicant must address all, and resolve all Fire _/_/_ Distract comments and/or conditions APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: II. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/~ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell SC-04-01 13 ~~S Proje ct No DRCDR00-41 Comolehon Date 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire d l _ eve opment 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures / / JJ.Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within / / 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used _ _ _ 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ KK. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police -/-/- with akeypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 LL.Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / / visibddy _ _ _ 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be / / a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background _ _ _ • The stenals for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE September 26, 2001 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY. Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00160-CRUMBAKERRESIDENCE-Arequestto construct a 4,343 square foot single-family home on 60 acre of land within Tract 11626 in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5051 Lomas Court-APN 1061-821-09 ANALYSIS • A Applicable Regulations The construction of the protect will result in 5 to 6 feet of fill in portions of the garage and rear patio area FIII exceeding 5 feet requires Planning Commission review and approval according to the Hillside Development Ordinance (Section 17 24 020 6.2 and 3 of the Development Code) B Background The protect site is part of Tract 11626, an 83-lot subdivision at the top of Beryl Street that was approved in 1983 This tract was the primary example used to illustrate the problems that the Hillside Development Ordinance was meant to address To date, there are approximately 30 vacant lots left within the tract, including five lots with homes under construction The site is located at the south end of Lomas Court, which is a cul-de-sac at the east end of the subdivision C Proposed Proiect• The applicant is proposing to build a two story, single-family home within the Hillside Overlay Distnct The home covers lust over 16 percent of the lot The lot is rectangular in shape and slopes southeasterly at approximately 10 percent. A 15-foot private equestrian and drainage easement exists along the south end of the property A 20-foot private equestrian and drainage easement exists along the west and east ends of the property. Toward the rear of the lot is the Cucamonga Fault Zone that requires a 50-foot building setback from the canyon edge (Exhibit "C"). D Gradino Committee On July 3, 2001, the Grading Committee reviewed the protect and did not recommend approval because the grading concept proposed was not consistent with hillside development requirements The Committee felt that the protect created an excessive amount of fill where alternatives and other techniques could be used to reduce grading The Committee • recommended the applicant redesign the project to take advantage of the existing natural slope. To do so, the Committee recommended the applicant lower the garage and home to a level that would require less than 5 vertical feet of fill The Committee felt that this would substantially reduce the amount of imported soil onto the site from what was previously proposed, and it would eliminate the ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00160 - CRUMBAKER RESIDENCE September 26, 2001 Page 2 need for Planning Commission review and approval of the protect The Committee also recommended the applicant limit retaining wall heights to a maximum of 4 feet, add a v-ditch along the southern boundary to drain water from the rear property area, and undulate all manufactured slopes created by grading On August 14, 2001, the Grading Committee reviewed the revised protect and recommended approval provided the applicant continues to work with staff to address hillside conditions (Exhibit "D") Though the protect still exceeds 5 vertical feet of fill in portions of the garage and patio areas, staff believes the home design is consistent with existing development within the tract Staff also believes the applicant could mitigate the excessive grading by planting mature landscaping on the site to soften the protect's appearance. The landscaping vnll be required to be planted to the satisfaction of the City Planner E. Design Review Committee• On July 3, 2001, the Committee (McNiel, Stewart, and Fong) reviewed the protect and recommended that the applicant work with staff to address hillside grading conditions The Committee felt that if all conditions could be addressed at staff level, the protect would not have to return to the Committee for further review The applicant did not attend the meeting • F. Technical Review Committee- On July 5, 2001, the Committee reviewed the protect and determined that it would have to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval because it exceeds 5 vertical feet of fill and 1500 cubic yards of grading The applicant has since revised the protect so the total amount of grading is less than 1500 cubic yards, however, the fill still exceeds 5 vertical feet in portions of the garage and patio areas. The protect is consistent with all other applicable standards and polices m the Development Code . G. Environmental Assessment The protect is categoncelly exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Gwdelmes RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2001-00160 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" - Information Sheet Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Resolution - Location Map - Site Plan - Gradmg Plan - Sections - Roof Plan - Floor Plans - Elevations of Approval ~°t INFORMATION SHEET DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00160 FILE NO Development Rewew DRC2001-00160 PROJECT NAME Single Family Residence APPLICANT• Tim Crumbaker LOCATION 5051 Lomas Court FLOOR AREA 4,343 square feet LAND USE CLASSIFICATION Residential EXISTING ZONING: Very Low Residential (VL) EXISTING LAND USE Lot 43 of Tract 11626 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE u ZONING North Very Low Residential (VL) South Very Low Residential (VL) East Open Space West Very Low Residential (VL) LAND USE Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Demens Channel Single-Family Residential SITE DESCRIPTION The site is vacant and slopes southeasterly at approximately 10 percent A15-foot pnvate equestnan and drainage easement exists along the south end of the property A 20-foot private equestnan and drainage easement exists along the west and east ends of the property Toward the rear of the lot is the Cucamonga Fault Zone that requires a 50-foot bwlding setback SITE SIZE The lot size is 60 acres ~ A" ~~ ~ DRC2001-00160 5051 Lomas Court t~ Q • • .~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~o t3c~~ ~~~ s~t'F, r- - ~- ~~~ A~~~\Y~~ YO~~i ~ .... ..~__ --- ~~wrrr O ~ MM~~ ~'~ J ~~. -- o ~' ~ ~ ~~~ ~. N, ~• B~ ~~ i a .r.~., •~~.. ~~~n~m 8'tC 1-V~'"U\ Ftl ~{/ ~~D~~~l~Y[ t II/1 ~ 1a \\ Oh ~~ 'be ~~ ~ ~~Y~' ~I~i ~:1i ~~~ o~ ^ 4< Y f ~~ R e 1 ~noo seWO~ ~~ roM+~~iD,vlM m ~~ e ^nrw~o a~ on w~ w aa~ I ~ su ~avs 9numm r s d~ a~~ ' ~ ' u a - wlv ~ atr,~s o - -- - ~_ . ___ '~'~ .t aodrvi sac n~ snot ln~ sac n~ sc~ wY M ~~ SBOC- ~~ ouac ~8~ ppv B~ S~ ~ SOIL 611E I LJ ur -q. lrs s e rm¢; W u^-sins tl IWIIf ~~ 8 8 NOLC03S oa oQ :a mY ~ a - ~ ~ ~ d d NOEL 03S 0 0 70CW AI~iNp wr _ ^-rw~ns r __ -y~' ._. 1 0 0 1pl.v iaOL ocac _~_ W: so¢ uIIL 6 itL 580C -osoz ~OTr oa¢ SOIL 0112 5111 rF~~ I . L c.~1 ,~ `~ \ ~ • ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ \ F \ \ N t ~ ~6EY' bI>E RAN r `\ ~~~ \ ~} , A ' ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ 6~ ~ e_, \ r a~e~ f e+v ~' ~ ~ I .~ w ~ I a~~ I '-~ p I a I Y*R w I I ~ e i ~ 1 ~~ 1 I ~ ~---__----'---_ 1 I j 1 ~ N 1 ~ 1 I !r OO FS 11 FS . '------------- -~ we w I s'' eva p I 1 { ; R IOI I § i ~e-r ~ _ ~~~ _ T01AL 4l4.S ~~~V1111 g41O~. iY~YT .lrFOa _~ ~w~ !r bi V t~ ~~ \ \ ~ti e ~ ~~ ~ 1° .\ \ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \\ \ \ \ a \ \ \ ~ \ ~+ \ ~ 3 ~ ,S \ ,,.~rr \ Z ~ sms ~, @n'~5 ~ ~ ~ ¢y .i a ra ; .. \ ~B~ armu • ,`. 0 „n --- i 4 ~~ - _/ YC ~ ~\ r HIV -r \ i j y~ 1 % fi f % • 1 9HF11 Y~ ~ IWL 11 \ ~~` i ~f{ I \ I i ~ • 1 \ 1 i TO 1 ~ qf9. `. `. __ 1 / ,~ ~ ~' ® \ \ ~• _ °h, v. \ ~ ~ ~~ ® ~ ~~ ~ -i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ .000N~OI.h~.1..M ~ ~~ • .~ ®.oa~~warn. I I aw rt Nr feet ----_---- ~1 ~~; y~y~~ __________ ______ ___ ~7f r-r .1--------- -- ~ e ~ RIGNt SIDE ELEVAtION lGL~ Vt P -O' we LEFT 81DE ELEVATION ~.,~^-... ~! ~i ~~ ~~ ~a~ ~~ ~~ s ~~ EI RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00160, A REQUESTTOCONSTRUCTA4,343 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON 60 ACRE OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 5051 LOMAS COURT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 1061-821-09 A Rentals 1 Tim Crumbaker filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00160, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub~ecl Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 26th day of September 2001, the Planning Commission of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission . of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speGfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referencedmeeting on September 26, 2001, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to property located at 5051 Lomas Court, vwth a street frontage of 76 07 feet and lot depth of 229 03 feet, and b The properties to the north and west have been developed wdh single-family homes The properties to the south have also been developed with single-family homes, although one lot is currently under construction The property to the east is a natural drainage channel (Demens Channel), and The site is vacant and contains no vegetation other than weeds, and d A 20-foot pnvate drainage and equestnan easement exists on the west and east ends of the site A 15-foot pnvate drainage and equestnan easement exists along the south end of the site that is shared with property owners to the south, and A penmeter wall exists on the north side of the site, and • f The proposed development is consistent ~nnth single-famiydevelopment in the area (Tentatwe Tract 11626), and ~ ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC 2001-00160 - CRUMBAKER RESIDENCE September 26, 2001 Page 2 g The applicant is importing 1026 cubic yards of soil onto the site, and The site is constrained by a 50-foot budding setback from the edge of the adtoining canyon 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows The proposed protect is consistent wrath the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vnll not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 The Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect ident~ed in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental tlualdyAct of 1970, as amended, and the Gudelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~o Division 1) Approval is for a 4,343 square foot home located at 5051 Lomas Court 2) In addition to the vegetation required by the Hillside Ordinance, mature landscaping will be requred to be planted on the site to soften the appearance of the project, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3) Construct the private equestrian and drainage easements along the south, east, and west property boundaries Enoineenna Droision 1) Install street trees per street tree I~st attached 2) Revise Gty Drawing No 847, sheet 7 to include street trees and proposed drive approach • I~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC 2001-00160 - CRUMBAKER RESIDENCE September 26, 2001 • Page 3 3) Pnor to any work being performed in the public nght-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred 4) Downhill dnveway shall be 6 feet at 6 percent, 13 feet at 5 percent to flowline, then up 5 feet at 2 percent in front of the garage Grade break between slopes shall not exceed 14 percent 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Lany T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 26th day of September 2001, by the folloHnng vote-to-vnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS L J ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM DATE: 7-5-01 T0: HENRY MURAKOSHI, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: LAURA J. BONACCORSI, RLA, ASSOCIATE PARK PLANNER PROJECT: DRC2001-00160 LOCATION: 5051 LOMAS CT DESIGN NOTE•5: 1 STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE gTY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-0F-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK). ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPEGES. CONTACT LAURA BONACCORSI AT 909.477-2740, EXT 4023 FOR INFORMATION. 2. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BY THE GTY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER 7HE SAME 3. STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4. INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DEgDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTHSOUTH STREETS FROM THE gTY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST. WIND-PRONE AREAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DEgDUOUS PALETTE. 5. INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR GTY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY. WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYONDAREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANYGTY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPAGNGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ONSffE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DMSION. ONS AND OFFSITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED. 6. PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW. IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKW~Y~`IIE~~L7{Q'[~j'[j~-/yR~~NAVAILABLEATTHE TIIVIE~F-CONDITIONING-OTTTION5ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS. IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT ANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FlNAL LEGEND. SHALL BE 15 GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. 1. ALL STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARD PLANS. 2. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PLANTING, AN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE CITY INSPECTOR. ANY UNUSUAL TOXICITIES OR NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES MAY REQUIRE BACKFlLL SOIL AMENDMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. 3. ALL STREET TREES ARE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION. ,4. STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED PER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS ONLY. . J (~D CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR STREET TREES: •~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2001-00160 SUBJECT: SINGLE-FAMILY HILLSIDE APPLICANT: MR TIM CRUMBAKER LOCATION: 5051 Lomas Court ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ComoleGOn Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/ /_ budding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced withm 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The sde shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/ /_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file m the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business actiwty being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner f / SC-06-01 1 Protect No ORC2001-00160 Comolehon Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bulding Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Bulding and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 10 A detailed plan indiceting trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in contunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Oveday District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral wrath appropnatefenang 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits 12 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Yrinch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade ~~~ / I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / s SC-06-01 Protect No DRC2001-00160 Comolehon Date 13 Wood Penang shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant . 14 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views 15 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry 16 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products D. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwiding permits or poor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Ail private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent in-igation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy • 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual umt is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and wrner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code This regwrement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 1 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I I SC-0ti-01 Protect No DRC2001-00160 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/- a Slte/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Ilne diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Dlwsion Pro/ect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) Dearly Identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report /_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~_/~ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and Ctty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the Ctty pnor to permd issuance H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be /_/_ marked with the protect file number (I a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Bwlding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of permit appllcatton Please contact the Building and Safety Drvtsion for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or motor addition to _/_/_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may Include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit Issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and /_/_ prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6 30 a m Monday _/ /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays I. New Structures • 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering _/_/ use, area, and fire-reststrveness ~~~ SC-06-01 4 Protect No DRC2001-00160 Comolehon Data 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s) • 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions J. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, Ctty Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Caltfomia to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of bwldtng permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for existing butldtngs where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: •K. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a budding permit, the appltcent shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If suffiaent water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be required m each structure affected by the insufficient flow L. Fire Access 1 New residential bwldings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be wstble from the street When bwldrng setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry M. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for all Maps and Plans) 1 Pnor to the issuance of a preliminary grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire Disthct approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program 2 Prior to the issuance of any precise grading permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire Dtstnct approval of a final fuel mod cation/hazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of nsk to the structures by vegetation • 3 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have completed, rn cooperation with the Ftre Disthct, that portion of the approved fuel mod~cetion/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Ftre District before the introduction of any combustible matenals into the proled area Approval is subject to final on-sde inspection ~I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / SC-06-01 Pro)ect No DRC2001-00160 ComoleBOn Date 4 Prior to the issuance of any Certficate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modfication/hazard _/_I_ reduction plan shall be installed The Fire District shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modification areas Further, the installed fuel modrfication plant pallet shall be established to a . degree meeting the approval of the Fire Distract The CC&Rs shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subject to (annual) triennial inspections 5 For asingle-family dwelling pro/ect located in the Hillside Development Distract, a simplified fuel _/_/_ mod~cation/hazard reduction plan may be acceptable The Fire Distract can provide a single page sheet of standardized notes for inclusion on the consWction plans Call (909) 477-2770 to obtain a copy, and to determine rf your protect is eligible N. Fees 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga _/_/_ Fire Disfnd as follows " X $132 for Single-family Residential Development "Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews well be assessed upon separate submittals of plans O. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance wrath 1997/98 Bwlding, _/_/_ Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electncal and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any _/_/~ consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a Calrfomia Registered Professional Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• P. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _/-/- 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ Q. Windows 1 Ali sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_/_ from frame or track in any manner R. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_. visibility SC-06-01 1 ANC[10 CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE September 26, 2001 TO• Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER APPOINTMENT • On September 12, 2001, Planning Commissioners Mannerino and Stewart interviewed prospectroe applicants for the equestrian representative position on the Trails Advisory Committee Although both candidates would be qualified to serve, the Commission Sub- committee unanimously recommends the appointment of Laura Jarek Her extensive equestrian background and enthusiasm for serving will be a great asset to the Trails Advisory Committee A copy of Ms Jarek's application is attached for reference (Exhibit "A") Respectfully submitted, Br er City Planner BB LH/~c Attachment Exhibit "A" -Copy of Laura Jarek's Trails Advisory Committee application . ITEM K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 0 9 2001 . RECEIVED -PLANNING CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Planning Commtssion of the City o1 Rancho Cucamonga invites appl~cahons for amember-at-large to represent the equestrian community and amember-at-large to represent the bicycling community. This Committee rewews proposed development protects to advise the Planning Commission on the location and design of trails The Committee meets on an as needed basis on the second Wednesday of each month at 6 OD p m Applicants must be at least 18 years old and a resident of Rancho Cucamonga Equestrians must be an active membe of the Alta Loma Riding Club. CHECK ONE: ~ Equestrian ^ Bicyclist NAME• ~AILaF} TF~QEK DAYTIME PHONE #: 9~7- ~ a8a EMAIL (Optional). RESIDENCE ADDRESS: ~7 ~©u-~R7A-fZ/ Alf A~-(~~ ZIP CODE• cl I ~O 1 1 Briefly describe your riding experience (i a ,type of riding, miles per week, years experience) hCt ve. been rid ~2 a ~ r ©I~--' ~ U,ecErs ~ ~ILP CcQ . r.., ,,.- 2 Why are you interested in serving on this Committees ~(,j,l~P - C7 0 0~ a ~cc ~ Cctn do you feel are the ~,ui ~L17 in fUrrrT2'U trail issues in Rancho Is ~2eI ~e Crl-hcczQ- kS41JeS' P`~'!'trz:L1'K F ~rr2t 1~ lnuolVes v ~+ 16 a,-tk List all equestrian or organ¢ations you are actively i m ~-~-~~ gnature Date Please mail completed application by September 1, 2001, to Dan Coleman, Planning Division, • 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. For further information, please call (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday, from 7:OOa.m. to 6:00 p.m. ~~ rl (s-„ rn~,.~~,,.-,,na i~-,,It~ rllyi of -~Ltllp ~~Ca<l -E7J ~/lloy