Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002/01/09 - Agenda Packet
C~.~~ ~~ • `'°~` ° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY JANUARY 9, 2002 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Maaas _ Corn Mannenno _ Com Stewart _ Com Tolstoy II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 12, 2001 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar rtems are expected to be routine and non- controversial They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without d~scuss~on If anyone has concern over any item, ~t should be removed for discussion A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00514 - MBK HOMES -The design review of bwldmg elevations and detailed site plan for one full and one partial previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 106 single family lots on 34 5 acres of land m the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan m the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN 225-101-44 Related files Tract 14495 and Tract 14523 Staff has prepared a determination that the protect is within the scope of pnor environmental documents B DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00618 - PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES - A design rewew of building elevations and detailed site plan for 70 single-family lots on 47 9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda and Summit Avenues in the Etiwanda Specific Plan -APN 225-171-05, 12, 13, 20, 22, and 25 Related files Tentatwe Tract SUBTT16147, Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP 00-49, and Tree Removal Permit 00-35 C DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00689 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES, INC -The rewew of detailed site plan and bwlding elevations for Tract 15711 consisting of 87 single-family dwelling units on 1854 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etrvvanda Specific Plan and the Etiwanda South Overlay District, generally located on the north side of Miller Avenue, east of I-15 Freeway -APN 1100-041-09 Related files Tract 15711 and Variance DRC2001-00756 D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00584 - PIEDRA DEVELOPMENT CO -The design rewew of house elevations and detailed site plans for 15 lots on 9 23 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road - APN 1061-561-02 - Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00585 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voce their op~mon of the related project Please wait to be recognrzed by the Chairman and address the Comm~ss~on by stating your name and address All such op~mons shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign ~n after speaMng E MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-23 - LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to allow service to patrons 18 years and older for an existing restaurant with sports bar and gall, including entertainment, dancing, amusement devices, and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 3), located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077-601-07 Related File Entertainment Permit 00-02 (Continued from November 28, 2001) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 00-02 - LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to renew an entertainment permit to allow, disc jockey music, dancng, satellite television, and amusement devises (pool tables, dart boards), and allow service to patrons less than 21 years of age in conjunction with a bar and restaurant in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 3), • • CJ Page 2 • • located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard -APN 1077-601-07 Related file Conditional Use Permit 97-23 (Continued from November 28, 2001) G VARIANCE DRC2001-00756 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES, INC - A proposed variance to allow a wall height of approximately 12 feet along the east and west boundaries of the parcel facing Miller Avenue that is not included as part of this subdivision along with walls along the I-15 right-of-way that are approximately 17 feet in height to provide adequate noise attenuation for the adtoining lots related to the final phase of Tract 15711, generally located on the north side of Miller Avenue, east of I-15 Freeway - APN 1100-041-09 Related files Tract 15711 and Development Revew DRC2001-00689 H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 - PIEDRA DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to subdivide 9 23 acres of land into 15 single family lots m the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelimg units per acre), located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road -APN 1061-561-02 Related files Development Review DRC2001-00584 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00585 - Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. TIME EXTENSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14872 -BANYAN REALTY GROUP - A request for time extension for a previously approved tentative parcel map to subdivide 20 8 acres of land into 12 parcels, 11 in the General Industrial Distract (Subarea 3) and one in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4 to 8 dwelimg units per acre), located on the south side of 8th Street between Cucamonga Creek channel and Hellman Avenue -APN 209-151-27 and 37 and 209-161-24 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A residential subdivision of 30 single family lots on 11 5 acres of land m the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelimg units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located north of Wilson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard -APN 225-071-66 and 67 Related files General Plan Amendment DRCGPA 00-05 and Etiwanda North Speafic Plan Amendment DRCENSPA 00-02 Staff has found the protect to be within the scope of the project covered by a pnor Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum K ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-48 - CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT -The development of a recreational vehicle (RV) and self-storage faality Page 3 consisting of 166,784 square feet on 12 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located in the Southern California Edison power line corridor adtacent to the Day Creek Channel, north of 4th Street APN 229-321-08 and 09 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2001-00083 -RIPTIDE - A six month review for compliance with the conditions of approval for entertainment consisting of a D J , dancing, and live acoustic entertainment in contunction with an existing restaurant with bar and billiard hall in the Neighborhood Commercal Distract, located at 6620 Carnelian Street-APN 201-811-56, 59, 60, and 61 M ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRCEP94-02 -COFFEE KLATCH - A compliance revew of the Entertainment Permit for Coffee Klatch in the Speaalty Commercial District, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard -APN 208-101-23 N ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 26 7 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration O ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay Distract, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration P ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A public heanng to consider certifying the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approving the Statement of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations for the proposed project known as Victoria Gardens, a mixed use development consisting of approximately 2 45 million square feet of retail, office, and avic uses, as well as up to 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land • • Page 4 The project site is within the City boundary and the Victoria Community Plan and is generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 O ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to establish a Development Agreement and the detailed rewew of a master plan for a protect known as Victoria Gardens, amixed-use development consisting of approximately 2 45 million square feet of retail, office, and suit uses, as well as 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land The protect site is within the City boundary and the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43. Related files• Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01 and Tentative Parcel Map 15716 R ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to subdivide approximately 147 acres of land into 97 parcels and 391ettered lots (private and public streets) to accommodate the proposed protect known as Victoria Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 Related files Development Agreement 01-02 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01 S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan by changing the land use designation from Regional Center to Mixed Use and modifying various text sections and graphics in the Community Plan to accommodate the proposed protect known as Victoria Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 Related files Development Agreement 01-02 and Tentative Parcel Map 15716 Vi. OLD BUSINESS Page 5 T DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-25 (RODRIGUEZ), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-17 (CHEVRON) -Review of the Design Gwdelines supplement for an approved Master Planned shopping center including a 2,900 square foot dnve-thru restaurant (Burger King), 5,548 square foot restaurant (previously Zende~as), and 2,740 square foot service station with drove-thru carwash (Chevron) on 10 acres of land in the Community Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -APN 207-211-12 and 13 VII. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS U CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-81 - JAROD CROW - An appeal of the City Planner's decision to not regwre fenang along the southeasterly property line fora 2,455 square foot single family home on 29 acre of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 8721 Predera Court -APN 207-631-19 VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Comm~sson has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment time If dems go beyond that time, they shall 6e heard only wdh the consent of the Commission 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Comm~ss~on Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 3, 2002, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~v~c Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga r~ C~ n u Page 6 Vicinity Map Planning Commission January 9, 2002 D,I Hills Bar P, a, R, E, ~ _ City of Rancho Cucamonga • ,~ CITY HALL N January 9, 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES Agenda 2 - 8 A Development Review DRC2001-00514 9 - 75 B Development Review DRC2001-00618 76 -159 Development Review DRC2001-00689 C & G 160 - 214 Vanance DRC2001-00756 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 D & H 215 - 354 Development Review DRC2001-00584 Conditional Use Permit 97-23 E, F 355 - 356 Entertainment Pennit 00-02 I Time Extension for Tentative Parcel Map 14872 357 - 392 J Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16100 393 - 420 K Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP00-48 421 - 490 L Entertainment Permit DRC2001-00083 491 - 508 M Entertainment Permit DRCEP94-02 509 - 524 Tentative Tract Map SUPTT16257 N - O 525 - 653 Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 EIR for Victona Commurnty Plan Amendment 01-01, Development 654 P Agreement 01-02, & Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 Development Agreement 01-02 O - S Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 655 - 656 Victona Commurnty Plan Amendment 01-01 T Design Gwdelines for Conditional Use Permit 95-25 & Conditional Use 657 - 697 Permit 00-17 U Appeal of Development Review DRCDR00-81 698 - 715 • T H E C I T Y O f RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 9, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2001-00514 - MBK HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for one full and one partial previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 106 single-family lots on 34 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2~ dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN 225-101-44 Related files Tract 14495 and Tract 14523 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 3 07 units per acre B Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant Land; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Day Creek Flood Control Channel C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Low Residential (211 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Flood Control Comdor D. Site Charactenstics The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously the University Planned Development), a 715 residential unit protect onginally approved as part of the University/Crest Planned Development by the County in May 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga The site is two of a number of tracts . currently being rough graded in the Planned Development The site is bordered by vacant land (proposed residential development) to the north, south, and east To the west of the site is the Day Creek Flood Control Channel The site is approximately 1,500 feet north of the newly constructed Route 30 Freeway Access to the site is from Day Creek Boulevard ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00514 - MBK Homes January 9, 2002 Page 2 ANALYSIS A Background In June1991, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors approved the University/Crest Planned Development in the Citys Etiwanda North area The University/Crest Planned Development entitlements combined two separately owned properties with 1,238 single-family lots, commeraal, school, park, and open space On October26,1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a revision to the Development Plan, which among other things, separated the Umversity portion of the development from the Crest portion The Umversdy portion of the development has since become Rancho Etiwanda The subtect tracts contain 106 lots within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development B. General The applicant is proposing to develop 106 single-family homes on two tracts approved under the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Agreement (Tract 14495 and Tract 14523) The homes wdl include six different architectural styles vnth ten floor plans The styles rnclude Ranch, Country, and Bungalow as pnmary architectural styles and Santa Barbara, Monterey, and San Juan as secondary styles The pnmary styles wdl make up 70 percent of the total home product The protect wdl also include side-on garages on all Plan Ones and a portion of Plan Twos. The side-on garages are proposed on 28 percent of the total product The applicant has proposed enhanced architecture on elevations that back and side on Day Creek Boulevard and W dson Avenue and on all mtenor comer lots The project is anticipated to be built in seven phases C Design Review Committee On November 20, 2001, the Design Review Committee (Stewart, Mannenno, Fong) reviewed the project and recommended the applicant make architectural revisions (Exhibit "J") The applicant revised the protect, which was reviewed again by the Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) on December 4, 2001 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to staffs comments with additional conditions (Exhibit "K") D. Techrncal Review Committee The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval E Environmental Assessment In June of 1991, the San Bemardrno Board of Supervisors certified the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October26,1999, the Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Development Plan, which among other things, separated the Unversity (Rancho Etiwanda) portion of the protect from the Crest portion The subject tracts fall within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development In August of 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues assoaated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would require a mator revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report A2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00514 - MBK Homes January 9, 2002 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2001-00514 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad B ler City Planner BB WM mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" • Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Exhibit "K" Exhibit "L" Resolution - Site Utilization Map - Phasing Plan -Site/Grading Plans - Conceptual Landscape Plan - Fence and Wall Plans - Elevations - Floor Plans - Day Creek Street Scene - Intenor Street Scene - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated November 20, 2001 - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated December 4, 2001 - Irntial Study of Approval with Conditions ~Z., _ ,r ' /~ ~ ~ i, ~ . ~•_ 'y ' ~~ 1c Jr~.Iil( ~.-11,=P .~~ ~'~• ~ ,.~ -. .~^' ~r`,s •;:w~ii It ice. ~ .I~d~w.~ 77 I_ai717/~~ :w,~ .. ~' ,; ~L'.~1 $. w~~~ i17iC'~ 1~~ '.~ •;A ~~~ :..1: .c.:~ n1 i°~ ~/ ~ .. ~~_ ., ...-;-•. -'=fear . , •, ~ ,.~ 1` S~ 1S~ .1 ~~q~( ~,iY~ r ' _ = ~• - __-- ~nrl~nv isv~ e :~ T-~~ ~,,. t,-.- - ~~_,. ^. 'a;' :sir : ~ Y wrI ~iI \~ii ~~" ~~,~I'~~ ~ it ~ • "'~~Ii~•: 1~i\Y' xf~Mltl1 rl, $nl~I~nv tlarl'dAU,L~L^S 3 _ ~: L .1_ ~•: J.1 ': i.,' `~ ~' X11 ~ I tai ~t'l, v ri r ' 1 ~~ ~ .~ t~ •s -OC i ~ ~ [~ b ~T d~~•. N rTi ~ ~ ~. GC~L ~ ~ 'S "+ .r Chi • ° r r ~ ~. • ~ " .es • z ` anrl~nv ssva~~nZa W ~. OC N ~ FT • ~Ffi - ~ '• _~ ~~ ~~~ -1~ '-Tin d I~G...... ~F~..axvn~Inoe x~~~~ 'xe~ i s •~ •'Tf'~- ~i~rl~~~~~ ~~~~~~ii A`~ '~ Exhibit "A" 2IOaI2I2I00 30S ~-!!~ ~~ vm ~~ rf '~'n\ V s ~ UNIT M IX ~ TRACT NO 1H95, LOTS 1-30 TRACT NO 1452} LOTS 1-48 I sues G ND -- PHASE BONNDARI' ~••~ TRACT BOUNDARY f zr is ] 1 1 UNR1 UNR 2F UNR 29 UNR] UNR1 2058 9F 781] 8F ]91] SF ]22] SF ]]OS SF 15719E 19T f100R 11]1 SF 1ST FLOOR 11]1 8F 1ST FLOOR 1129 SF 19T FLOOR 1058 HF 1ST FLOOR UNIT TABULATION UNR MIX MAY VARY DEPENDING ON IANKET CONDIRONS ~ ~ ; LAND USE SUMMARY MODEW 10 AC PNASE 1 2 9 AC PHASE 2 2 ] AC PHASE ] 2 5 AC PHASE 1 2 6 AC PHASE 5 2 6 AC PNASE 8 4 2 AL PNASE T 4 0 AC BUILDOUT 1 4 AC STREET6'M='DD'; 39',T '1M; %' 6'1", WILSON AVE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD 10 5 AC OPEN SPACE L0T8 A S B O 1 AC TOTAL N 5 AC SIDE ON GARAGE SUM MARY PREPARED FOR TRACT NO 14495, 26A (15) OF 58 TOTAL UNRS IUVE A SIDE ON GARAGE ~ TRACT NO 1452} }1S 15 Oi 46 TOTAL UNffS HAVE A SIDE ON GARAGE M ~K 4 3 TOTAL 28S 70 OF 108 UNITS HAVE A SIDE ON GMAGE NOTE ALL STREETS INSTALLED AT ONCE fxs iipiwAm.Dmtl ~~. ~RZete nn~~~ ~ ANO NOT PER PNASE PREPARED BY LARGEST RESIDENT41 LOT 18]95 Si __ SMAUEST RESIDENTVL LOT ]200 Si ~" ~~ AVERAGE RESIDENT4LL LOT 9609 SF --.~.. SETBACKS BUILOINO SETBACKS (FROM R O W OR PROP LINES) FROM YARD 16 WfiH SIDEWALK Z INTO LOT (ADA COMPLIANT) RANCHO ETIWANDA ZO AVERAGE STAGGERED TENTATNE TRACT SIDE YARD 5/10 5 MIN NO 14495 814523 BUILDING SEPPFATION 15 MIN TRACT NO 14195 • LOTS 1-SB REAR YARD 15 MIN TRACT NO 1452} • LOTS 1-46 (20 MBKj GARAGE SETBACKS (FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK) TECHNICAL SITE PLAN FRONT FACING 20 MIN INDEX MAP AND PHASING PLAN SIDE ENTRY m MIN MIN LOT SIZE ] 200 SF arz rv[vlarv AVGUeT a xooi 0[v6[o aOe[0 a xaot Amsm 9[c[uM0 to xom MAX lOT COVERAGE (40S) ] 200 SF LOT EQUALS 200D4 SF BUILDING n SHEET L OF m x ~, a n -, i F I \ ~ / l~ / ~ ~ _ PREPARED FOR M~~K ) I]S T•cyncar Dpp Imn[ 0.•9x618 M9fp•w )u MV )py~) PREPARED HY NOTE - Wl ND 1RL WRMIS M IN911SR L11fYIR MGLIELI S $f(CTIGIMS - .cus m wu rAm sass DIAL s Rp.O[U N LMpNY[[ RM LR< I nw•e mana¢ a wrvax. ~ 4 x)u LI{([E~~ ~~~-~~~ PHASE BOUNDARY - TRACT BOUNDARY • So HIGHEST RESIDEMIAL LOT NO -l - I-- S- Z 1 SLOPE O DROPPED GARAGE O S © DROPPED GARAGE 10 - - - - PUDUC UTIUTY EASMENi PROPOSED WATER LINE PROPOSED STORM GRAIN LINE -a PROPOSED FlRE HYDRANT --o PROPOSED STREET UCHi PROPOSED OAYUCHT FlLL A ~} CRgpINC SECTION (SEE SHEEP 5) - HEIGHT Of RETAINING WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL r TOP OP CURB EIEWTION Ike T_ :-e I 1il RANCHO ETIWANDA ' TENTATIVE TRACT I NO M48~ d 14523 i fi ) TRACT NO 11{95 • LDTS 1-58 TRACT NO 115]7 LO15 1-IB TECHNICAL SITE PLAN (PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN) oArz vxxvA¢o A«Dn Ix x001 ~msm «roscA a xooi MYISCD DCC[YB[R t! x001 ans•.oy SHEET ~ OF~ S~ \ ~~ i ~I 1 _ff?~I r - .;~'• ~ ' ~f ' ~~; ~ . nw. w AT• i • ~ y~r ~ •~ 1 ~ I I' ' ~ I Y I T ~~~1 ~ ____ _LI / l _ _ -_ 1 f, = .f =~ ;,~ ~ ~. r ~ ----,~ r i ~ R E `•„~,/' (.,~,~ L ~`~'I `J I I ~F~ ~ ~~~~ L~~~L-•~~7, L_~~ C_JIa ~ v ~ 1__J J LL" Hery~I ,3 ~ I _ ~ .. • r O H• Y p f~ 6 la JII N i . Jl _ ~k J' ~ dl [~ • N Jc Jn D P ] M [ r v ••ljrr Y f 1Lnr vL io = Gwi E] f E6 f G E k } L w } - - s la 6 ~ Illfm v • G 1E v yy ~I /u{ l O ~ n ev~i 3 ' • I .LI [ f~~ R- !u Bi e ~~ ~ • W n. O . o o • v A ]L •Grm vL •i urrv ir =r v nilvv ) ~ ,.~ PREPARED FOR M~~K 1]S T[cxxaru~Dm[ Ixnx[rCA 9]618 PREPARED BY NOTE - u wu Rxa w•nRws wo r.rsx .E• .roswR «cwrzas srtoraws - [¢[4 10 RK rMEI YOBS vwLL H maRxo w cwowwiE Rnx i R c wxxiw wxw mvs a XrPxv.,v cR[ 'r ~LI II .9•L~~L ~. .. LEGENU •~~~~~- PHASE BOUNDARY TRACT BOUNDARY •• 50 •• HIGHEST RESIOENTUL LOT NO t L [ 21 SLOPE O DROPPED GARAGE 0 5 O DROPPED GARAGE t 0 PUBLIC UTILITY EASMENT . ~ ~~e [ Du~ •A O ~•o PROPOSED WATER LINE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE -n PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED STREET LICHi PROPOSED DAYLIGHT FlLL • A }-~ GRADING SECTION (SEE SHEET 5) - HEIGHT OF RETNNING WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL i0P OE CURB ELEVATIOrv _• ~_ w f ._ I _ ~ f (I~ ~I [ 1I~ ~~ <\~ f I~ ~__ _~ ~_ 1 _ ___ I I Ib 1 ~_ I 1__ h i _ i,_ J I RANCHO ETIWANDA TENTATIVE TRACT NO 1449y 814523 TRACT NO 14495 LOTS I-5B TRACT NO 14523 LOTS 1-48 TECHNICAL SITE PLAN (PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN) owT[ RR[RARm Aucus a zoos R[vlsm oc]oa[R a zaol R[VISEO a^C[YB[R IG /3~a1 SHEET 4 OF~ GRADING SECTIONS t •,_ 1~ _. ~ ~1~_h _• uJ J SECTION A"A' •.. .aaw,. ~' 1J oa n~ •...~..~. SECnON'F'F BECTION K-N 8ECTIONn B ~® ^~ 9L SECTION 0-G x P~I~~ ..~.ew~.... F~I~ra.•..ay•..,. ~. 6~ TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS a' wlapl ayFHe mr allCeLl BECTION T.=l' ~ ~(.. ... ~..• .. i i o w e1O°.aw]~ n. J~ ]r•m ] ata~~ (]vPUU en R/M - .nvevn aTRr:<Er]aA oE-eAc slKns Ar r a- ov r r r r e vamox a u t - ~n J •9 secnoN'a c ..... ,o,vy~.~~ SECTION N N R " ~\ •Ff; „.q awnoN o• o x~.. •e...•..a.., ,~ ~~ ~~ I ' SECTION T-T .t I J~~..,.. r- -_ -_a'_,' BECTION'N"M' NOTE //9 Rx-E WRMl1 YO IM's Rx were[ NmlRCrs sTVnnws oAr amc eoucvNO mr evreAU ---.. Q ].. eo r rtmcw es Rlw - MIEfKM a]R~T SMQi itl11Yx 6 S ~• ~ M .. _ SECTION'J'-J SECnOn 'O'~O' SECTION P P PREPARED FOR SECTION N-TI M~~K 1]S ltrx~um~OwL dmrt G9]61B wa+M MOO wa+M•m _ PREPARED BY ,. -- RANCHO ETIWANDA secnoNn n TENTATIVE TRACT Fgl e.,..ay..x.. "' NO 14495 &14523 -i~~~ TRACT NO 11195 LOTS 1-88 ti ~ TiUCT NO 11523 • LOTS 1-IB ~II Y SECTIONS ~ wrt vulv.MCo- uwun IT Tml o•]¢ vmuo anoxa a mol _ tx t wrt xcmcoCcuece le xool BECnON'R'-R SECTION •s•=s• SHEET V OF ~J n m rno••oee.'roeim.me i.xq\w Nn a~Y x/iN~ SELTION'E'=E' °Wauon~nW°tl w/JYJ sECBBBY (BWl%Bi OBBBBB[IB/B) pz ! y_ ~1 RB/t BBHtSa LMIl BIBLE rJ 3NWfl irk jj~'w~tl+~~ ® " ~ !~~ 3'JVW.IBd < t O iY'I}.~~~ 7 M 1~ : 4 3 ! rnavaa N~is3o (lrriweoi3n3o 3NL0 A•J0lONNO31 SL1 11 1 66 ~ ~ a ° ~( ONtlUB~S sawoN M8W i ; ;;rNElth~ ,~ r~; ~ - o *. ( i a . ~ f1~i~i~~~ll ~ I v i i s ! aaaaaaa i 1 I _~ .I ~~ _~\~YVI I i~\\\ yl~~ III=<~\\ _~~ ,t~^~ .' nlm-I„ ~,. ~ I ~;~ F~ ,I E~~xhibit "D" .+ u ''•~~ka ~€~.~~~ ~~~~~~~~ _~.~~~~: n Sao = ~ I I I ~S ~ bc_~° ~~ ~c e° ~~®~ V a ~~ ~~~ ~~F v oo~ / y/ °a>Yem p YYYYYkYYY O /f N>qY} Z~ 33 ppaa }7}7 iii ~ i~3~~i$~ ~ a~@t~~~€~€~ Qry ~ iiB$"~C~i C ff d~q ~ i ~~ ~BUauOn;/wwoeW WJ Si[BbBG 18K1 %tld ODSPBBL IBMi) I {{I~:, II// ® ~ ~ i ~Y a !1 BZ51458»45/1JVtl1 B49LB V]3NNtll ZBII lam. j~%I~~i !r 4iL 39VNJYd ~~~ 6 I' y -~ » a #1! M31A3tl N~JIS30 /lN3WdOl3A30 3AItl0 AOOlONH031 SLL JZj '~I'f~':1'~ ~ Ypr~ ~` ~aS /J-/ ~:i j ,El,, orroaaas sawoHMBW <~a ~,~HI''/,? *~'MM' ! °; ' ~ i T~ '~ _~ r~ l>. ~ n1 ~ - ~° ~ el ~ _ 8€ . : ~ - ~ ~ I ~ E / - I ® ® ~ I ~ .1 ® ~ h L A - .J L_ J_ 1 I n i n b l ®' ~ ®' _ I ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~i ~ «.^ 'i - ~ - ~~. '~' nla ,a.,. „~ ---- ___ 1 1' ~ I .i ° B~~ ~~C' ~iBil ~,~._~®~ l~ ® ® ~ .® I ~ ® II I .. . ~ I I ~ -- N I 1 1 ® V n _ _ - ~ n , ~ I II ®. d~ N ~ ~ ~ .' II 1111 I I 1 II N 1 1 -L i ~ i' I I I l I i I ~ 11 .. u it ie ~ I I ~l~ I~ I I~ ~.~[a.A Hirt-- --iiWtwxa w~v6 __ _ (L i titer ® I v e ~ e i -- --- -- -~--- --L- - -- - - - -- -I---I ! -, o ® ~jo Flo Exhibit "E" ~~~ o i S ~~ u s ]: i u`B ~ ~~~ ~e ~ JJ {S ~L E ~~ zz~~aie i p::Y pxY~~: i±y3;Q~((K~ u ~ g oo"ei°i [ ~ K~ot~~BiY~dO{ babbi,bBOiba >?i .>e= C i Y ~iil i I ~~li 2 _~ :o ~=£~ "°~~8 ~~~#`~~ ~~€ °~@ e~<F u 3~SL~g~ o`~ i~~t~ Asa ~a~ F~~~ 's. ~~s F~ym Fyj i w~C fy0 6~u3 y o~" Oo $Co= z.a • a }[ ed.owam~^Y awN~~ szcBEet 16r8)Itvd °0ta69e les8l u [ [~1!'[I aaV \y y^pp• y !.[ 3'JVM0Vd Bl8Z8 VD 3NIAal u ; l i a ® m ~ C~i ,I [!' An31n3a N~J1530I1N3Wd013A30 3A121O A`JOlONHO315L1 ~ f ItI'[~I~r~ f ~~d} $ • 4 ~ e¢Yry °i} ONYHH~S sawoHMBW ~o ~;l11~1(~p'iti t•.~o; i ~?' i •• o = ~tlt;[t~llt ~ 3 s ! i<KC«Ka : ° t s !"i I~! ilk [) ~ ;'I i I I[i }~I e I I e ~ a i a f i @ e @ @ a s 9 $ e @ ` }i@ i ~ 9:~;6a ~ ~ ~.€xe€d f ~ ~ II of ~{ 1911@@~ ~ [~!'~sl~ ~ e d1 gp~ea°,a a @ e ~° ~ '~ jsi ~[~ @ ee eos coso A °- ~ 4a @ @ @ @~ ~ 2 } @° F @ S r a a a S [ } 1t ~[ ~ 3?5~~~~.~@~:@~ @e °f4 fk~'la~5g5@ @~~ o }ii}~}[i~li~i~ OBO® O 0 BOO J u 4 F H ~d ~~ 1~ e E~ C ~~~ ~ ieooooo eaoaoc ~ i x 0000 0 0 O00 i! N ` w e i= u u aa6 ` u [III r e e __ ~ s q ~ o ~m mac! o e ~ ~ z © ~ ~ L-..-, ~ u ~ n a F I~ ! ~ II ` l r ~a E ~ ~ ~ ~ } ' u I ' I~ ~ ~ ,~`S,slr'I~ tit - ~ I ,~sf~~@ < See oeo • a o 5 '. u ' ~ } ! Y @ } ~ f I i .~}~~ O I +0000000 U j S r .1 v 0000 F "-~ i < c I L u : a I i ~ ~ is'v ~ . f q` @ 9 4 66 S}a@ I[1 [ [ @ } E o ~1if tia~ [ ° @3 I i~ ~ I f y o 0 000 00 00 ' : 's o Y P i! e i 1 ~ ` .:~' @ 0 q OO Op ~ m \ `a o m m x a } [ '~ f' ~ .v 3ti ~~ (i 1~ ~~ i6 t:. i@~ 14 ~,~} I b 1t ~} r ~ z ~ u t 's° ".; > ~o ~ >S =' „oX i oi: ~ x n ^+-'- ar ~ Q .O-4 i dMVUen~ppNea PFVJ SL[Peet (eMl xvd oocasae fare) u ~ € 71 y- • W ~:! 3'JYWJYd B4BTA YJ 3NI~al 2O FC €~,ti:111~~ o' ` ; ®. p ~ i S ~ € M31~3a NOR3a IlN3Wdol3A3a 3ARl0 AOOlONH031 SLL NiFr~ I(~~1 ~l~1't®j.- g~ jo~~ ~Nf€,~,t ,; ~' i ~ °~ oNYaaas sawoHABW ~; ~:: ; , s ! ! ~ _ ~ ~ a ~l _ti a ~ tea ~ t € l ii et 6~ 3 9 . . } ~ ~ t ~ ~3i ~ 8 ~? ~~~~t e 7 ~ ~ ~t € I tij ~ e~~e ;e -~i !e ~t'3 ~€' ! 'o ~E I 7 t ~l~t~ ~t i ~~ ~~ ~ ~ g' E~ '4 t~ tt~~s ~ f~i s ~S .t 3E~ i ~ ~ ~ l d C s jt!t e! ~ ~ e ~ : t ~Y ~ie is ~.fti t t~~! NIW ..4 ~ ~ S NIW .b ~ ~ r o z ~ ~ i o 6 0 ~ ! n F ~ n v 0 s U ~ e i U U 0 U 6 _ © ! _ o - U _ S ~ ~ t ~ 'f~' .O-.4 '~-y (6NY1d 621 Ni ii6) 5~I21YI. 1N917N t ! ~ fSS ~ }3~ S y b_9 9 4 ~ .~ § ~ ~ ~ ~ ) e 3 ~ u b 5 .0-9 ! ~ a ~ ~ l e ~ J i O '-' o U 1£ (~ ~ Y J d C b a W F i o F r s -_ -~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ s i I ; i u p I O I F I_ m ~, i I ~ h ~ f ~~ ~ r _ ie I~ ~ Z ® n (~ ~~ E V u ~° a~a s€~@~': ~~~~~ aV ~~~~~~~ ` ~a ~3€~~~p S~ g W z O r F F >] Wo w ~~ ~s~_£~S ~ i ~~~~~~~'~~ ~. a z 0 x F ~ az W~ a w Exhibit "F" R~3 z O z ~ a a~ > z y W ~ w _ o `z o a oa U z a z~ 0 x .. a F m ~ F wz a~ w _^ iF;'- 'I' V ~.~ :.: ~' :. F:.:E Y:t~!. `~ a~ A< z 30 ..~ WU~ ~ U 0 zz ~a xa x x$ ~~ _ e 0 _~_ o RIGHT ELEVATION M,iK RTOY NO 300116{ s ~ off- ^ x s PLAN O N E RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA • ~ KTGV ~~JP:y~~ 6_ •• • 12 0 0 Iv~K RTOY HO 3Po1166 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA i 0 ~~~ KTGY GROUP, ~.. ~/I e ~s .,,,. 13 RIGHT ELEVATION ~ o_~~~ ~ x e PLAN O N E ~ ^ ^ MjK ^ cmt nn ~aonee RIGHT ELEVATION 0 1 16 ^ ~ - ^ : e PLAN O N E RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CA 0 ~~ KTGYmOUPI~:, v y- is 0 ^ ~~ RIGHT ELEVATION s ^ 0 1 16 ^ ~ - ^ a e PLAN O N E ^ RANCHO ETIWAN DA ~~ KTGY GROUP, ~,. ~ ~ e`,^7,..7~-r M1K RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA °-^-- ^ RIOT NO 10011N ^ M~ 15 ^ o MjK Y.TOT NO 3001166 s eunwww aTn [ 60.COITCLIVq[ u ~ ~a ^~-^ 3 8 PLAN T W O RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA • ELEVATION 2D MONTEREY COIRrtPY 3lYI.[ .UIGl1IrtClllp[ mbb . ~n¢areuv.umn pm r210 6Tau~a ua:teu~nu~ vpmS~,nnaap ~ ~~ KTGY~P_GRWPEy~ 17 LLLTAl1V 1~ LA RANCH ELEVATION 2B MUNRIILTSIYL[6Y[N~T66T110.[ COUNTRY ~ r1°~"im:v"`ia" ~~,'~ ~~..o, ELEVATION 2C BUNGALOW MjK ^ trot No cams RIGHT ELEVATION 0 ~ 16 ^ -~~~ ^ x e PLAN T W O RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA KT6Y GROUP ~`"~ I8 ^ ^ u M jK ^ [TOT NO i0Y1166 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ~~ KTGY GROUP, ,.~ 19 RIGHT ELEVATION o ~ is ^ -~~~- ^ x e PLAN T W O s s • ^ ~~ MjK ^ axar no xoouw RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA V ._ •• _~ ^ zo RIGHT ELEVATION o a ie : e PLAN T W O o ^ MjK ^ cror Nn noun RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA KTGY GROUP, ~.~ •~ _ :,~. zi s M s RIGHT ELEVATION o ~ is ^ -11~-- ^ PLAN T W O '~ V ELEVATION 2C o 0-1..~~6- ~ BUNGALOW = N PLAN TWO S I D E E N T R Y ~~,,{{.,.~ RANCHO ETIWAN DA iv{iK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA KtOY NO 1[01166 0 RANfH SIYI,L.,RCNR[CNR[ COIMIAY.4l VI1 ARCNIRCNIR[ ELEVATION 2D MONTEREY ~~ KTGp_Y GROUP ,. \/ k T .. u 23 ELEVATION 2A RANCH ELEVATION 2B MUflfLRKY KlYIL ARfNIt[f1VRt COUNTRY f~a,~ ~~ J O RIGHT ELEVATION ~ o-ti1~6 ~ PLAN TWO -SIDE E N T R Y ~ RANCHO ETIWANDA 1v~K RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA [MY NQ ]001166 ~ ~ s KTGY GROUP, ,.~ s 24 • • i ^ ^ ^ KTGY GROUP: ~, ~ RANCHO ETIWANDA /~ ••°°•••:;• MTK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA `~ °~"=,-° °---- ^ cror no mono ^ «~.. x5 RIGHT ELEVATION e ,. ^ -~r1~ ^ : e PLAN TWO -SIDE E N T R Y ^ ^ ^ M)K ^ [TOT NO 3001116 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ©KTGV GROUP ~.~ u 6_ .. 26 ~ s ~ RIGHT ELEVATION ^ oft- ^ PLAN TWO -SIDE E N T R Y ^ n i ^ ^ *R.~ RANCHO ETIWANDA Kr~rc,~xouP.,.~ n , +v~K RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA °'" °~"-' ^ cror rvo ~oouec ^ ^ RIGHT ELEVATION ^ o~_ ^ : e PLAN TWO -SIDE E N T R Y ^ ~ COIIMRY 3lll [ ARCXmCNR[ ELEVATION 3A RANCH exncwow erne Anauncniu ,uiel,a~[rt,~.~dO V, MOi¢iea,oT ELEVATION 3C o ~ 16 BUNGALOW ~ -~~~-- ~ s e PLAN T H R E E RANCHO ETIWANDA 1v~K RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA aror rvo ~oonu ~ i • ELEVATION 3D SAN JUAN ~~~ K~TGY GROUP, ,.. .. ~""' 29 •, ELEVATION 3B COUNTRY RArvcx sms Aacxmcrvu eAN NAN SfYI [ ARCHR[CRIRL ^ • ^ ^ RANCHO ETIWANDA ~~ KTGY~`_~*~OIIP~y^ 1v~K RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CA 5_ ~~~ r- ^ cior r+a moos ^ 30 RIGHT ELEVATION o ~ is ^ -1~~-- ^ 3 6 PLAN T H R E E ^ ^ 1v~K ^ FTOT NO I00116f RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ~~~~ K7GY GROUP, ,.. ~~~ ~. • ~ • 71 RIGHT ELEVATION o ~ ,e ^ -~Z~- ^ z a PLAN T H R E E s s ^ ~_~ Inll RIGHT ELEVATION o a ~a ^ -~~- ^ x e PLAN T H R E E s REAR ELEVATION PLAN 3C BUNGALOW evnc~towsm.e ~acertec~ `~~ ~ RANCHO ETIWANDA ~ KT6Y~ arCmalP~,.^ 1vf~K RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 6= '"'~~~~ ~ - ^ nor na xnim ^ ""a 32 ^ 0 ^ ^ ^ MjK crar xn xona i ~~ LEFT ELEVATION .~`m~w`- ~..... RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 0 REAR ELEVATION PLAN 3D -SAN JUAN KT6Y i_ .. 33 RIGHT ELEVATION ~ 0-~.6-- ~ ~ e PLAN T H R E E 0 a n • 0 IMRY SM2.RRLM!!I,(Txl[ (~ ~Vr1 V ELEVATION 4A RANCH Ruxcer ow srvr.e ~arrmernlae ~ o_"~~_ ~ x e PLAN F O U R 1v~iK [lOT xQ 1W116f RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA aurt~ Rwne~u srnt •acxrt[rnme ~ KTGY GROUP, ~. ..~. 35 ELEVATION 4B COUNTRY uXCx srvee ~Ralrteerxu ELEVATION 4C BUNGALOW LL~VAI7UN 4ll SANTA BARBARA ~ ~ ^ RIGHT ELEVATION MjK cmr Ha moor i e PLAN F O U R RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 0 ~\ KTGY~ Rlr __s eOUP~ ;;~ 6=•• ..~- 36 ^ ^ *~~ RANCHO ETIWANDA ~~ KTarcrxouP •" wYK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA `-~•••• •°~'~- ^ cmr na xoonee ^ '""' 37 RIGHT ELEVATION ^ o-vL- ^ ~ e PLAN FOUR ^ ^ ^ M)K ^ [tOY MQ 3WII66 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ~~` KTGYT. 5 ~ ,.. 78 ^ RIGHT ELEVATION ^ o_~^~_ ~ : e PLAN F O U R 1vIjK ^ [lOT NO 31bIIK RIGHT ELEVATION - u __ o • ~a ^ --11~ ^ z e PLAN F O U R RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ~~ KTGYO~i ,„^ ~^~ 39 rn x -~ _. a 0 ~ Opi Bcd s ~1 ~---- 0 --~1 ~ ~~~ o KI c6en " 1~~ ' _ f - ~ °" Family v~..~ Coun r~ _ _ - ___. L _ °U _ _-;;~ - ___ ____ } ~ ~~ J v~:h: PrBcd s s~r ~ Entry O av~ ~ ~ l ~~ irrilvg ~~ ~ 4 ~ ie I ~ 3 Car Geroge PLAN ONE q BED • DEN IST FLR 1534 SF ~ i i 2ND FLOOR 1324 SF I i i TOTAL 2858 SF ~ I I ~ ~ I I - -- - --- q 0 ~ Ib ~ ~Zr ^ z g PLAN O N E ~/~'~u RANCHO ETIWANDA l~l{ 1` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ^ cmr rvo ~aouee ~~~ KTGV GROUP, ,.• to a -------------------- 0 ~~ I rr_________~ II II 1 I I II II I 1 11 11 11 11 1j -tl II ., 1 1 1 I I wiC \ ~`V O(LS \~~ I I ~~ Master B da:~m Bath wIC I I I I I O O I Oven To Below I I I ~~~'~ Loft I I _' Opt Bed 5 Bedroom 2 I ~ i Retreat I I m~ I I I I I I opt 7 M?K ^ atoT No xsouea s s 0 1 /\ 1 ml I K~mhn J I~I""7SbI' ~ °•1° ~7~~ Entry T1-II ® -. I\Y1 ~1_I_pt\Y i ® 1 ® Famt1Y Room ~ I I ®~®~ 1- I j___ Den . ~ / I~B O°.B°. ~ Beth a \B h 1 I Bed I Three Grp arage I at a~ I 00 PORCH AT 3A AND 2C I i I_ j I I PLAN TWO FRONT ENTRY 1 I 4 BED . LOPT I ' I I IST FLR 17% SF Master I 1 1ND FLOOR II80 SF ~ I , Bedroom ' r.... , - \.\y I I TOTAL 3076 SF I I Opt Retrut I I moo' o~ ~ ~ I I I I x s PLAN T W O FRONT ENTRY RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 0 ~` K~GY GROUP :; . 16 .... ^ - --~ I I ~ I I I I, II I II ~I 1j Ty II I r X O '~ ~ i I ~® I / ~v `J I I ®ILIJJI aiC 1 Mtster ~~ Beihr Bedroom I inl I I KI: hw oo ~ I wlc I i I ~ Family Room nom. ~~ O O ® I I ~ C ______ . -__ __ Open To Beloa ~ _____ _ 4 n I I ~ ®®® Lolt I I ~ I I '~/ ovt Bea s ® Bedroom 2 ~ L Relreet I I _ _ _ _ '~~ L vin V' ~ `- ~ Entry Den ` ~ Dv~Bva 1~~ ~ --- I I ~~ O _____ ® ® "'Pdr Serv I " , I 1 I elh Bed I I \ O ~ ® I Flez S e ' ~ I I ~ i i ~ I PLAN TWO SIDE ENTRY ----------------- ~ I I 1 BED • LOFT _ ~ I i I IST FLR 1776 SF I °O ~ I , ~ I 2ND FLOOR 1382 SF I I A I 1 1 Q i I TOTAL 7058 SF Thrr:Gr~Gsre e i a 8 I I I ~ I I ~ i I I ~ I I i~ ~~ I i ~ I I I ~ I i L_________________J I I I I I I Q b 0 • ~0 ^ --~~~- ^ i 8 PLAN T W O SI D8 E. NTRY ~/(~ RANCHO ETIWANDA LVh/ 1~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ^ FttIY HO 1001166 ^ • ~~ KTG~GROUPy~.. ~ _ ,.. .. a zz w,~ ^ Bath s • ^ ^ ~ _ ~ ~__ ~~ i I I ~~ ~~ 5'-0" 55'-0" rr __ __ ___~~ p I I~ ~~ ort Oi[ ~I II II I~ ~ ~ i .- ®~ ~ T3 0, ~~~ ~ ~ ~ w]e ~ B<dr~ ~ ~.... ~ o Ip Messer ~ ~~;"~ ~ Bath 0 ~T Bedroom ~ ~ a ~ ~ ® Den/Bonus ® IM r-, ~~--LL~~ ~eme~ Op~Bea 5 ath 2 i Kitchen - \t~' f~ wm , ~ _ , ~'- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 i I I __ ___ _ ^ o o i i QI r"_~ Pdr C Sere ~~ i i i Dlnin{ ~u Three Car Oera6e C Lot BedroO 3 Open To Below O~: ~ Ip ~~ ® ® ® ; ~ ~~ ~~Y: v:~ ' n ~Pe ~ ~ ~ ; ~- ~~ OPT DBN 9 SUPER FAMILY /LOFT I i i I i I IST FLR 1730 SF gW oom ~ I 7ND FLOOR 1154 SF TOTAL 3731 SF ~ ~ ~ FLLX SPACE ADD 170 SF I ® ~ i 0 ~ 16 ^ ~Za~ ^ Z 8 PLAN T H R E E ~, ,~~J~ RANCHO ETIWANDA ~~/J,/I~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ^ [TOY NO ]OOn66 ^ i ^ ~~ KTGY GROUP ~.. ~~ ._ __._, zs »... ^ ---------- -- -- -- ` - - - - - - ------ -- -- - -- ~ ~ ~ I 4 5'-0" ~ 53'-0" c 5'-0" i ii ii i i ~i ii i ~i ii Ty h p ~/(/~~~y~J If7I I i~ / ~ ~ ~O v/ I I ~ ~.+~~._ B<dr m wm ~ p Den/ ODt. Bed 5 O ~ ~ ~ I ~ ® ~ !' 'LII I Mader I I ~ ~ ~ Opt 8ueper Family i Maeter Bath Krtc en I~~'-~fBRIII~ ~ vn v~ Bedroom I I Lam' g' ~ ~ I ~ Fe mil:Room I~(;Blll i i Beth 2 I 1 Pdr I p p i l ee _ ____ 1 e -- ~--- ®- -~ Bedroom 3 ~ I 1 ere 1 I onn m vow ~ O I I ®®® ~ravk I ~'Serv Lrvm Entry j ; j Loft v.,. ~---~------ i Bo~~a Room ~ i -- - i ~ [ 1 ~O~ I 4 Y Bed'OOm ~ ~ ® ~ 1- N ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ ~ Pou Cer rage ~ I I ~ PORCH AT •B AND •D ~ ~ PLAN FOUR ~ IST pD R BONU852 SF a ~ ~ 2ND FLOOR 1,810 SF i I I I TOTAL J,692 SF ~ a ~ i i i , i ~ ---- 0 • 16 ^ -~~~- ^ ~ 8 PLAN F O U R ^ u RANCHO ETIWAN DA ~~~ KTGY.GROUP._;;. 1VI~K RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ~`~ ° ^'~"~~ .~°'°- ^ arar No aaoues ^ 34a .,.. ^ 0 O OO D Super Family Bedroom 5 r \ ~..r.. Ovt Bedroom 5 Bath ~\ :°a:. 0 s W 1vIlK [TOY NO 1001166 J Imo' u 1 ~ I'YI'I f ~ Bedroom 6 ~-} o :p.°::m 0 ~ le ^ --Y~-- ~ ~ 8 PLAN FOUR OPTION S RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ~~ KTGY GROUP, ,.~ 0 gat m x -~ 0 LOi 58 I KEENLAND DRIVE ~ LOT 57 ^^F -'t' fi60' 800' ^ -'~~- . u LOT 56 75 0 LOT 55 75 0 ~ ~7 i7 • RANCHO ETI~A ®R~.r°v 1V~/I~ RANCHO CUCAM CA ~~ .o ^ n i~ Exhibit "I" z 0 z J 6 Z 6 0 z J C F Z 0 U z J 6 ~~~ w z w U F w w R$ F a a U rr a L~ r >^ _~E2:1.. S~f:"si is •:~ ~= Y9E~ Qa A U ~i a~ 3~ e W U ~ ~ U ° Ux o zz a~ ~a B x8 r,`}z FSy ~ 0 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 10 20 a m Warren Morelion November 20, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00514 - MBK HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for one full and one partial previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 106 single family lots on 34 5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2~ dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN 225-101-44 Related files Tract 14495, Tract 14523 Design Parameters The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously University/Crest Protect), a 1,238 residential unit development approved by the County in May 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The site is part of 7 tracts currently being rough graded in the planned development The site is bordered by vacant land (proposed residential development) to the north, south, and east. To the west of the site is the Day Creek Channel The site is approximately 1,500 feet north of the newly constructed Route 30 Freeway Access to the site is from Day Creek Boulevard The applicant is proposing to develop 106 single-family homes on two tracts approved under the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Agreement (Tract 14495 and Tract 14523) The homes will include 6 different architectural styles with 10 floor plans The styles include, Ranch, Country, and Bungalow as pnmary architectural styles, and Santa Barbara, Monterey, and San Juan as secondary styles The pnmary styles will makeup 70 percent of the total home product The protect will also include side-on garages on all Plan Ones and a portion of Plan twos. The side on garages are proposed on 28 percent of the total home product The applicant has proposed enhanced architecture on elevations that back and side on Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue The protect is antiapated to be built in 7 phases Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project The applicant has worked with staff to resolve all mator design issues Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Along vnth providing enhanced architecture on homes that back and side on Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue, provide enhanced architecture on all comer side lots within the development Comer sides should have rap around porch elements where possible Where elevation designs limit wrap around porches, enhance elevations using additional architectural treatments Revise enhanced architecture on homes to include more wood windowsills, banding, decorative gable end details, and stone/rock veneers All veneers should be wrapped around on side elevations a minimum of 5 feet or to a logical stopping point 2 Revise elevations for each style to provide elements and materials consistent with adopted Rancho Etiwanda Architectural Gwdelines (see attached) Ranch -provide wide horizontal siding Country- provide vertical or horizontal siding on all 4 sides (no siding proposed) Santa Barbara -provide combination of hip and gable roof forms Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion• Exhibit "J" Ay(~ DRC COMMENTS ' DRC201-00514 - MBK HOMES . ~ I November 20, 2001 Page 2 1 Provide real nver rock/stone on walls and ptlasters and other areas where nver rock is proposed Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee approve the protect subtect to the above-mentioned conditions Attachment Rancho Etiwanda Architectural Gwdelines i Design Review Committee Action: i Members Present Pam Stewart, John Mannenno, Nancy Fong I i Staff Planner Warren Morelion I The Committee recommended the project be revised and brought back to December 4, 2001, Design Review Committee meeting The applicant agreed to make revisions The following are ` revisions that are to be done, pnor to the meeting. 1 Architecture should be enhanced even more on homes that back and side on to Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue, and on intenor comer side lots within the development ~( ~ 2 Provide Floor Plans to show all footpnnt changes in elevations ~ 3 Add windows to the back of side-on garages 4 Provide windows on some roll-up garage doors that face the street The number and which plan(s) shall still be determined ~ 5 All usable porches shall be a minimum of 7 feet wide Label where porches are used 6 Add more bnck/stone treatment to all Country architectural styles. 7 Add a hip roof design to the Santa Barbara, Plan 4 architectural style Also add recessed niches to the design 8 Revise rock treatment on Bungalows so that it is real nver rock I >~ ,f I ,I ;~ aye DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Warren Morelion December 4, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00514 - MBK HOMES -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for one full and one partial previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 106 single-family lots on 34 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN 225-101 ~4 Related files Tract 14495, Tract 14523 Background On November 20, 2001, the Design Rewew Committee reviewed the protect and recommended the applicant make revisions and come back to the December 4, 2001, Design Rewew Committee meeting Because of short notice, the applicant wtll bung a revised set of plans to the meeting The following are issues that should be addresses at the meeting 1 Architecture should be enhanced even more on homes that back and side on Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue, and on intenor comer side lots within the development 2. Provide Floor Plans to show all footpnnt changes in elevations 3 Add windows to the back of side-on garages 4. Provide windows on some roll-up garage doors that face the street. The number and which plan(s) shall still be determined 5. All usable porches shall be a minimum of 7 feet wide Label where porches are used. • 6 Add more bnck/stone treatment to all Country architectural styles 7 Add a hip roof design to the Santa Barbara, Plan 4 architectural style Also add recessed inches to the design 8 Revise rock treatment on Bungalows so that it is real nver rock. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the protect subject to the above mentioned comments Design Review Committee Action Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Warren Morelion The applicant showed the revised elevations at the meeting that addressed the above identifying issues The Committee reviewed the issues and recommended approval subtect to staffs comments and the following conditions 1 Shutters proposed for enhanced elevations shall be standard throughout the Tract 2 Architectural treatments proposed on gable ends of San Juan, Plan 3 elevations, shall be standards throughout the Tract 3 Intenor return walls and comer sidewalls shall be stuccoed to match individual home colors All walls shall have a cap incorporated into their design 4 A minimum of 50 percent of garage doors shall have window treatments Exhibit "K" A~~ • BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File Development Review DRC2001-00514 2. Related Files: Tract 14495 and Tract 14523 3. Description of Project: The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for one full and one partial previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 106 single family lots on 34 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN 225-101-44 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: MBK Homes 175 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential 6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda North Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development within the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan (previously the Urnversity Planned Development), a 715 residential unit protect originally approved as part of the Urnversity/Crest Planned Development by the County in May 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga The site is two of a number of tracts currently being rough graded in the Planned Development The site is bordered by vacant land (proposed residential development) to the north, south, and east To the west of the site is the Day Creek Flood Control Channel The site is approximately 1,500 feet north of the newly constructed Route 30 Freeway. Access to the site is from Day Creek Boulevard 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Warren Morelion (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Exhibit "L" f\y~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2001-00689 Page 2 • DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a signficant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project Signed Warren Morelion Assistant Planner December 12, 2001 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (X) Environmental Impact Report for University/Crest Planned Development (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) (Certified June 1991) (X) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Revised University project (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) (Certified October 26, 1999) (X) Initial Study/Addendum for Revised University Project (Certified August 1, 2001) r~ u Aso • RESOLUTION NO 02-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2001-00514, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 106 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14495 AND A PORTION OF TENTATIVE TRACT 14523 ON 34 5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WILSON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 225-101-44 A Recitals 1. MBK Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Review No DRC2001-00514, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 9th day of January 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred. . B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue Huth a street frontage of 976 feet along Wilson Avenue and 1,362 feet along Day Creek Boulevard and is presently vacant, and b The properties to the north, south, and east of the subject sde are vacant The property to the west is the Day Creek Channel, and The property has been rough graded, and d The project consists of Tract 14495 (58 Lots) and 48 lots of Tract 14523, and e The project falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the spenfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: ~s~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-01 DRC2001-00514 - MBK HOMES January 9, 2002 Page 2 The proposed project is consistent with the obtectrves of the General Plan, and b. The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conddions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or ~ improvements in the vicinity ~ 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 8808291) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the ~ University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental ' I Impact Report or Negatne Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the ~ Master Environmental Impact Report On October26,1999, the County of San Bernardino Board of ~ Supervisors certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No ' 98121091) because of a revision to the Urnversity/Crest Planned Development In August of 1999, ~ the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption . l of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would regwre a mayor revision to the previous Environmental Impact j Report Based upon the facts and information contained in the certified Environmental Impact ~ Report, together with all written and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no j substantial evidence that the project vHll have a significant effect upon the environment a There have not been substantial changes in the protect that require mayor revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the seventy of the previously identified significant effects b There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the protect is undertaken which will require mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified significant effects ` ~ c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and ~ could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the protect well have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous ~; Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the protect but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the i environment, but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternati~ ~S Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-01 DRC2001-00514 -MBK HOMES January 9, 2002 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Diwsion 1) Where slope conditions require retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow access onto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, pnorto issuance of grading permits 2) Provide a 3-foot minimum landscape area between back of sidewalk and a 6-foot block wall on all comer side lots 3) Reduce the property line walls/fences between lots to a maximum of 7 feet in height Where combination walls ewst, limit the retaining walls to a maxmum of 2 feet in height Engineenno Dmsion 1) Development Review DRC2001-00514 shall complyv~nth all conditions of Tentative Tracts 14495 and 14523 and Development Agreement No 00-02, the City of Rancho Cucamonga U C P ,incorporated, dated November 29, 2000, CO 00-088 for Rancho Etiwanda and the revised University Project The conditions of approval of the Tentative Maps shall be completed tointly with the general ongoing and specific conditions as noted in the Development Agreement 2) Wntten notice shall be regwred from other City Diwsions, i e ,Planning, Fire Safety, Budding and Safety, and the County of San Bernardino, that all of their respective requirements have been or wdl be complied with, pnorto recording of each final map or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first 3) The improvement plans for the off-site streets, storm drains, and Landscaped Maintenance Distnct infrastructure shall be approved and an agreement and bonds in-place guaranteeing their construction by the master developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, pnor to approval of the final maps or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first. 4) The street and storm drain improvements for the adjacent and southerly Tentative Tract 14523-1 (US Homes) shall be coordinated and constructed concurrentlywith those of Tentative Tracts 14495 and 14523 (MBK Homes, DRC2001-00514) If DRC2001-00514 improvements are not constructed concurrently with those of Tract Map 14523-1, a drainage acceptance agreement from the southerly property owner is regwred for any resulting storm water runoff ~S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-01 DRC2001-00514 - MBK HOMES January 9, 2002 Page 4 generated by this protect The drainage acceptance agreement shall be in-place, pnor to the issuance ofany construction permits 5) Final grease Grading Plans shall be consistent with approved Landscape Maintenance Distnct Plans Lot 43 shall be graded with a 4-foot bench from the back of sidewalk to wall as shown on the Landscape Maintenance Plans Environmental Mitigation 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (fonnerlythe University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, as certified bythe County of San Bernardino, and Initial Study/Addendum as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Larry T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dayof January 2002, by the following vote-to-tint AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS -J \ ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2001-00514 SUBJECT: Development Review for 106 Single-Family Lots APPLICANT: MBK Homes LOCATION: Southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Comolehon Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / / agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to _ _ _ relrngwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense rn the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard / Conditions, shall be rncluded in legible form on the grading plans, buddrng and construction _ plans, and landscape and ungation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenVDesign Review approval shall expve if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file m the Planning Division, the conditions contained herern, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement 2 Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner sc.,,-o, , ~SS Protect N o DRC2001-00514 Comolehon Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and / / State Ftre Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection Distract and the Building and Safety Division • to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, _/_/ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ time of bwiding permit issuance 7 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 8 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 9 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 10 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Assocation are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or pnor to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 12 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requvements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencng 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adfoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 14 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each _/_/_ support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two'/cinch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 15 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant _/_/~ 16 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought von or black plastic coated chain link to _/_/ maintain an open feeling and enhance views _ SC-11-01 2 ~~~ Prged No DRC2001-00514 Completion Date 17 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk _/_/_ 18 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 19 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured /_/_ products D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shail be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropnate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropnate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and vrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development _~ /_ Code and/or Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement This requirement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be mcluded _/_/_ in the regwred landscape plans and shaii be subtect to Cdy Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Diwsion 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided wdh decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 9 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the pnnaples of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code SC-11-01 3 ~~ -[ Protect No DRC2001-00514 ComoleUOn Date F. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the Fourth Street Rock _/_/ Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice of the City Adopted Special _/_/_ Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposd on any property 3 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway protect _/_/_ in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pnor to accepting a cash deposit on any property 4 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the _/_/_ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bwlding materials and construction techniques provided, and tf appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bwidmg plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 5 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the Cdy to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report an the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved envvonmental documents shall be considered grounds for fortert 6 In those instances regwnng long term monitoring (i e) beyond final certtficete of occupancy), the _/ /~ applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Ctty Planner pnor to issuance of bwlding permits Said program shall identify the reporter as an indiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented G. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to detenntne the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead sWcture shall be subject to City Planner rewew and approval pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, S~_„-0, 4 A~ Protect No ORC2001-00514 Completion Date f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report l l Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls / / 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the Cdy prwr to permit issuance I. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/ marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest _ adopted Uniform Bwlding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mator addition to _/ / existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may _ _ include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a . copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwlding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and _/_/_ prior to issuance of Bwlding perinits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays J. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property Irne clearances wnsidering _/_/_ use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Unform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions / / K. Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Bwlding Code, Cdy / / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in _ _ _ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/ / perform such work _ _ 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / • time of application for grading plan check _ _ _ 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of Bwlding permits _/_/_ SC-11-01 5 ~~~ Protect No DRC2001-00514 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where Improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Ciwl Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all Interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 49 total feet on Day Creek Boulevard 57 total feet on Wilson Avenue 3 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings Day Creek Boulevard and Wlison Avenue 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the CIty M. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage faallties, community Vails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and sVeet trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Wilson Avenue x x x x x x d Da Creek Boulevard x x x x x x d Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and ovedays well be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of consWction fee shall be provided for all items In the fore of an agreement and bands by Suncal 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, inGuding street Vees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the CIty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/_/_ / / -/-/- -/-/- _/_/~ -/-/- -/-/- -/_/ • SC-11-01 6 ~~~ Protect No DRC2001-00514 Comolehon Date b Prior to any work being performed to public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _/_/_ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and _/ / interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _ _ d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise spectfied by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as spectfied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per Ctty _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwnng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure perantts are required A cash deposit shall be prowded to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ 4 Street improvement plans per Cary Standards for all private streets shall be prowded for review _/_/_ and approval by the City Engineer Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Cary Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Ctty Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program N. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall _/_/_ be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permtts, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District infrastructure, Rancho Ettwanda protect (LMD 10) 2 A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 3 All requred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_/_ developer until accepted by the City 4 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan Day Creek Boulevard SC-11-01 7 ~~Q 1 Project No DRC2001-00514 ComoleLOn Date O. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final draina t d h ll b b ge s u y s a e su mitted to and approved by the City Engineer pnor to final map / / approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage factldtes shall _ _ be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the / / property from adjacent areas _ _ 3 Trees are prohtbded within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured / / from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk _ _ _ P. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, / / electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility _ _ _ Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing uhltttes as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the / / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the _ _ _ Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permds, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdrvtston or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pro/ects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilthes and other interested agencies involved _/ /~ Approval of the final parcel map will be sub/ect to any requvements that may be received from them Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / / new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building _ _ _ permit issuance tf no map is involved. 2 Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed / / beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the _ _ _ sattsfacbon of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors /_/_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within / / 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used _ _ _ 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ Protect No DRC2001-00514 Comolehon Date S Windows • 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner T. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective far nighttime wsibdtty APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -~-~- -~-~- SC-11-01 9 ~~~ '~~ ~ ~- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~.j FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0509 PROJECT #: DRC2001-00514 PROJECT NAME: Tract 14495 and 14523 j DATE: November 21, 2001 ~ PLAN TYPE: SFR Tract APPLICANT NAME: UCP, Inc ~ OCCUPANCY TYPE: SFR Hazardous Flre Area FLOOR AREA (S): i ~ TYPE CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: FD REVIEW BY: 12166 Summlt -Tract 14495 and 14523 Steve L t F P t t Pl S oca l, lre ro ec lon anrnng peclahst 4 PLANNER: Warren Morehon ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~ The Technical Review is normally the second stage in the Development Review process involving Fire District review The following conddions of approval were identified in the initial protect review and have not been addressed by the applicant Although we have tried, not all Fire District requirements for the proposed protect may be included Adddwns to or changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements ~ Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Diwsion to obtain Fire ~ District approval If your protect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire District conditions Y I and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance 3 I A. Outstanding Fire District Issues i ' I 1 Required Note This protect has outstanding unpaid service fees in the amount of $132 that are due and payable at this time Please remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire '. District B. Commumty Facilities Districts 1 Required Note The protect is located within a "Mello-Roos" Community Facilities District for fire protection services ~l~`~ Required Note• Please provide proof that the protect has been annexed into the Fire Protection Community Faalities District This information is usually found in your Title report C. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Required Note. The required fire flow for this protect shall be 1500 gallons per minute at a minim residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes one fve hydrant is regwred per 1000 gallons of required fire flow 2 Required Note: The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 3 Public fire hydrants located with a 500-foot radius of the proposed may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwldmg materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 5 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 Existing fire hydrants and moms within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 7 If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the building permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of~ the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reaprocal maintenance agreement, that shall be submitted to the Fire Distract for acceptance 8 Required Note. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, ali fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Pian 134, "lnstallaGon of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner D. Water Availability 1 Regwred Note: Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract Water Avadabddv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system maybe regwred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow E. Fire Access 1 Regwred Note Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, bwldmg, or portion of a building constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150-feet from an approved fire district vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the faality or budding 2 Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets designated fire lanes 3 Dead~nd Fire District Access Roadways Required Note: Dead-end Fire District access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus This may include a cut-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District f"C~O J 4 Required Note• Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, E inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 5 Regwred Note Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be • provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance witf Fire District Standards 6 Required Note More than one fire district access roadway shall be provided when it is determined by the Fire District that access by a single road might be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access Provide secondary egress/access in accordance with Fire District standards 7 Regwred Note Each phase of a development must comply with Fire District access roadway requrements The Fire District will not accept roadways that will rely on future construction to provide access roadways to meet minimum standard All structures located on dead-end or substandard access roadways shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed in accordance with the applicable standard 8 Required Note- Single-family Residential Dead-end roadways shall not exceed 600 feet in length measured from the vertical plane of the curb on the cross street to the curb line at the top of the cul-de-sac 9 New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a conVasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry F. Hazardous Fire Area 1 Required Note Hazardous Fire Area Development- Prior to the issuance of a buldng permit, the applicant shall meet all requirements for development and construction within the Hillside District, the Very High Fve Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ), and the State Responsibility Area (SRA) This may inGude increased street . widths, on-site water supplies, fire-resistive construction, Class A roof assemblies, fire sprinklers, etc , contained in the Fire Safety Oveday District Standards G. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for All Maps and Plans) 1 This protect is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" based on proximity to or exposure urban -wildland interface Mitigation measures are regwred The bwlding(s) shall be constructed in accordance with the standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Oveday District-Area FR-1 or Area FR-2 2 Landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Fire Safety Division for rewew of proposed vegetation All groundcever, shrubs, plants, and trees are required to be fire-resistive in accordance wdh published references The plant palette shall include the common name for all vegetation The landscaping plan shall identrfy all native species proposed for retention 3 Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualfied and experienced in wildfire hazard mitigation planning 4 Prior to the issuance of any grease grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modfication/hazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures by vegetation 5 Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Certfiaate of Occupancy, the developer shall have completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modification hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the protect area Approval is subtect to final on-site inspection 6 Prior to the issuance of any Certfiaate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan shall be installed The Fire Distract shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modfia3tion areas Further, the installed fuel modification plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire District The CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subtect to (annual) triennial inspections r ~ 7 Phased protects or temporary fuel modfcation plans must meet the requirements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire District For asingle-family dwelling protect located in the Hazardous Fire Area, a simplified landscaping/fu I modification plan may be acceptable The plan shall detail the minimum thirty (30) foot minimum defens space and proposed and/or existing vegetation The Fire District can provide a single page sheet standardized notes for inclusion on the construction plans Call (909) 477-2770 to obtain a copy, and to determine d your protect is eligible H. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the budder shall submit a letter to the Fire Distnct on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. I. Fire District Service Fees' 1 The following fees may be applicable to this protect and are being identified at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs. Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subtect to approval by the Fire Distract The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted. When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division " $66 Preliminary Vegetation ManagemenUFuel Mod cation Plan (Includes SFR In-fill lots) $66 Final Vegetation ManagemenUFuel Modification Plan and Inspection (Subdivision) $132 Single-family Dwelling Review- Hazardous Fire Area $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection "Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division ' Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 2 The following service fees are due to the Fire Distract and payable at this time. $132 -for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) $132 -Total due at this time Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire DistncC " Plus a microfiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division *Note: Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for rewew of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans J. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tena~ improvements, fire protection systems andlor any consultant rewews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans ~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: January 9, 2002 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY. Kirt A Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00618 -PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES - A design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 70 single-family lots on 47 9 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda and Summit Avenues in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. APN 225-171-05, 12, 13, 20, 22, and 25. Related • files Tentative Tract SUBTT16147, Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP00-49, and Tree Removal Permit 00-35 BACKGROUND' The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16147 and Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP00-49 on January 10, and 24, 2001, respectively. The applicant is now requesting design review approval of homes on the protect These are the same homes constructed as the "Carriage Estates" on the adjoining property to the west PROJECT/SITE DESCRIPTION: Project Density 1.46 dwelling units per acre A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning' North: - Single-family homes, Estate Residential (1 dwelling unit per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Vacant land; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Single-family homes; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan West: - Construction of single-family homes; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan B General Plan Designations Project Site -Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) • North: - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) South• - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) East: - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) West• - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00618 -PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES JANUARY 9, 2002 • Page 2 C. Site Charactenstics The 47 9-acre site is currently vacant, and gradually slopes from the north to south, at approximately 6 percent There is an existing home, which is "Not-A-Part" in the middle of the protest's frontage along Etiwanda Avenue. The land to the north is pnmarily vacant with a few scattered homes The site ~s surrounded by single- family homes to the east and west (under construction) There is a 300-foot wide strip of land separating this protect from the 210 Freeway to the south. A Community Trad is required along Summit Avenue within the Metropolitan Water Distract nght-of-way, and a Class I Bike Path is requred within the parkway along Etiwanda Avenue Local feeder trails are regwred for access to the rear of each lot. ANALYSIS A General The site wdl be developed under the Very Low Residential Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan using the same houses built in Carriage Estates to the west. Five house plans are being proposed, vwth four different architectural styles Traditional Country, Early California Ranch, Bungalow, and California Country. All plans have four- car garages; optional cabana/pool rooms, and RV garages broken into various configurations as follows Plan 1 is single-story, 3,467 square feet, and features two attached two-cer garages The . plan is afour-bedroom vwth a den/option retreat. Plan 2 is single-story, 3,802 square feet, and features two attached two-cer garages. The plan is afour-bedroom vwth a deNoption bedroom five. Plan 3 is two-story, 4,227 square feet, and features athree-car garage and one attached single-car garage, or an attached four-car garage. The plan is afour-bedroom with a teen room. Plan 4 is two-story, 4,405 square feet, and features two attached two-car garages The plan is afour-bedroom with a teen room/option bedroom five with bath and astudio/option office Plan 5 is two-story, 5,000 square feet, and features athree-car garage and one attached single-car garage The plan is afour-bedroom with a retreat, a teen room and an office/bedroom five/media room option B Design Review Committee The Committee members (McNeil, Stewart, and Fong) reviewed the project on December 4, 2001, and recommended approval Action comments have been attached for your convenience (Exhibit "I") C Technical and Gradmg Review Committees: The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on December 4, 2001 The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on December 5, 2001 Both Committees recommended approval of the protect subtect to • conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. VZ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00618 -PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES JANUARY 9, 2002 Page 3 D Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on December 4, 2001 Approximately 20 people attended the meeting, which included property owners of the surrounding single-family residences A couple of the residents expressed interest m the plotting of the homes, as well as the types of walls and fenang along Etiwanda Avenue An emphasis was expressed on keeping the rural look of Etiwanda along Etiwanda Avenue. Staff has worked closely with the developer to plot homes, wherever possible, to present their "front" to Etiwanda Avenue Approximately one-half of the frontage along Etiwanda Avenue consists of front yards (i e., not enclosed by walls). After the neighborhood meeting, staff continued to receive calls from concerned residents who oppose the project design. Staff has made rewsed plans available to the residents to rewew. The project site has been graded and a new concern is the height of house pads above Etiwanda Avenue The grading concept was approved by the Planning Commission in January with the subdivision map and is not part of this application. Staff recommended to the applicant that they conduct a second neighborhood meeting with surrounding residents. CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, and the property was posted. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Revew DRC2001-00618 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:KC\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibd "H" Exhibit "I" Resolution - Location Map - Site Utilization Map -Tentative Tract Map -Grading Plan - Landscape Plan - Floor Plans - Elevations - Phasing Plan - Design Review Action dated December 4, 2001 of Approval for Development Review DRC2001-00618 b3 LOCATION MAP DRC2001-00618 ® Project Site 0 parcels I 1~~~ ~~ N W~ E s ~~ ~~~ --, -~ - TENTATNE TfiACT MAP NO.16147 lSU A ABYrHCN 6 LOlBI J A FVWIDM 6 4 P+D OP TE flaA'AILA C0.CNi lAIC4 M TIE ITT 6 Mai]ID gUAKY1~~ CpMY 6 flYa ~14DNJ. BEAT: CF~CAI.iC(fMaii61L KLY/C668AD CQNIYCF YA14 A9CAIC BAY®NO AI.OIDf 91D1 Is f/aa aMigl b NO~a ~ 1 « P]' a a III I 1 1 I I I L __- f_1_j.;--~ I v li I I ~ I __-_ ~. ~~°® ~ IL____i_~ I i • ` _~ ~~~ I I I I I --1--_L1_J ~__-- Ir--- „~ -+-_ ~4 _~$'DeL..~ I arwe~ I T \ a a tl /4 II IIOI a ' IN a I ~rtn„cv dr._I ~ \ ~AOII I r`LLO°}°"I ~\ ~+~ ~ ~ ~ I \ ~_______ I I~ ~ ~ a maI ~__~_ ~---- I rx In sa i~~ uAv 1L~D ~~ mo• atlCl /C Illp ~palalR NIP y:i "'°.vtla dPe ~iuPO°"I ,~ ay""aniee ~ w uo i ____ i a, ~.oy°^ ----1 i 1 ---`gym"" / I 1 --1v~Pm°r~' _~ M N ~" ~ .I ~~i~ D.~ - _ ®~_ a a 4 ~~ I 1 x a I q i~. J w s. ~ •- I Y ~ M/ 1 MfI L _ _y_ __=. ____ ~ v v u a . s ' I ~ 1 R~ 9 i O ~ . w . ~ r O ' ~ID~1 J I i ~ rsun wa ~ ~ n ~ a n a :.auC~~ %~..' n 1 ~1~ I f v I a I ~V I ~~--}-, I ,.G., a~ s I~ . i I i I I i I i I~ I I CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FoR TRACT NO 16147 CARRIAGE ESTATE II RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAIJFORNIA RANI -4 gAN2-17 RAN3-B FL.W 4-17 R,ws-7a roTn~ - ~o ww drt- MICOW !OIX MAP ww ru- mnooy f ` ~. F a RJR®! 1 Y ~ Aro - o .~ ~` ~.fiT~.. ., h7..~ ~. pq ~f xs - wia A .~ r ~C + wv - w .v V . Stfd* . G as- o~c j ~ ~ ~ Or _ s s IIi ra =~~ - T ~- _ ~~-_ ~~~~ ~ ~-~y~~ ~~ `w Y~ ~ YS J a n .'AJP .wrl~~_ 0 L _ Y - • • C~ l r • L _ y--' I I I ~ I i ~ ~_____ __ 1---- - ; ----- it ai j i 1 i l i I i ii ~ ~ i ~~..-_.L_. ~ i i ' ~ f--- _ ~_ _ I I ' ~~ ~,~, i _~ - - _ -~ 6~0 !89 ~ e ~~! IBft' € eel, , B ! aIlClIB a~ t [ 1 ~ ~ ,I ~ ~~q FB9~ 6~'ll ~ 8 (' Q ~t! !B ~! ~ j ~ ! I ®~ J 1~N n~~~~1N~1t1~ 1,IIS111 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~lI~~~I}~~~~~ I~~I'~I~ U ~@I~lB ~~~~~~~~13~~~~~~I#~~9~! - o U s f x a ~i B AA ElAA~ i I 14rB @R!~ I 1! s ~ a~ ~~ a~ ~:..II ~~ ~" 1~ J AAA A 4 A A i B lliil~~~l~ ~~~~gg 4,! €p~~~i E~ B® ®~o°© 3 ~8~~' ~ A LLI ~ ~ z U W~U W co ~ U QZ~ ~Uo U~~ r ~ L J ------ - --- - -- -~ I r --- - o® ~:~ _....~. .... .,...,,..ma ~av ~.... _~ Meewrv Wel _~~ r---------- - --r---- ------I- -- ---- -- --- -- - --- 1 ~, ~ -- -- -- -- - - - -- -~,, ~ ~-_- _ .1 ~' ..... ®a_,,....~s.a_...q,a.. }-•+~ ~EL0.~r~ . CS~L ~ . 041771.° ~~° CARRIAGE ESTATES 11 TRACT NO. 16147 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ErnvaKan A18AP wau. A!O FBJCE OETAL ' ~.,a. .m.,c.q~r .v-. ` , z ~~-s~-~ S _ w ~ _ .."`.^ w- °°°'IX.v BI~Mf AVBI.E WALL DEfAL I I ® ~a.r CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN,_„e, P.D=109 DP=1.]910 ~^~ - 11 ~1~ ~1 1 ~ 1 1 _~ P.0=HI990 ~ ~ I~ ~~ 1 1 I[ ] ' { I ,' ~ `' \\ ` ~^ _ ~l ~. _ P.0=1.13!0 I I I ~ ~/ I '~ I II I ~ ~ I n~ _ S ^ I L ~- I ~ ~A .~ /'n ~ j ~ tir ~ ~ u ~~ ~~~. ~' ~ ~A 4~. 4 ~ ' ----- ; - - -- ~. __ ~~ " I ~ p y / I I I ~--- ~ f_ - ~ ~ ~ I ~ 0 ______ ___ __ _ _ _ _ 1' ii ~ . _ _ I r I I ~ I T __ II, y~ ~ ,; .- ~ I~ ~ {z. %;i P!= .ia ao ti 1 ~~ I ~ II ,~I~I ~' / ~ /yp- I ~t~-~i ~~ 1 'P'F' i it i ~L I~ _ ° _ ` ~ ~\ ' - ~ ,r-< _ ____ ______ ___ __ _ ____. -- I _ _ _ _~ _ z I ~- ~ I;~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ I e 4 PP=iYm:o ay Pm=i.as ]o y i i 1 .a I ',n`} i I W 1~. ~ `j ~ U Z 1, i Q ilil~il!i ~ 1! i s p I 1 1 1 ' jai (" ~ 3 1 ! i. lii ,r 1 ~ ~. 1 t Q ~ 1 ~9 ~9 i, ;3~ 1;, I' i~,;~,~p 4~I~ t ~ I ~ iL ~! ~' ~" it Iii'"~'I Z ~ boo®B~ ~ !; !!~~ ~! ° ~\2 cTo z U a W U ,~~ i-- ~~ ~~ ~~: A A A ~~~ i ii __3_. f-- ~ I ~ --- - ~ ; e 0~ ~ ,-- g~; ' 0~'v j n( hi . ~, i y _. ]e 0 b\~ T M M Wa y z w ~' x F ~ 0 .. a" ~ ~ ~ a~ ~u ~ a 0 ~' ~ W z • F p W n~ ~ "a a U a U ~ U a ~ ~ 0 ~ ~x a ~ a ~~ as U i~~i ',: PLAN 2 • 3,817 SQ. FT. ~® PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES vaoi - ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S II ^ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA i ~ .,~,_ ^ M H Wa .. N ~, z w a ~o F a, M a~ FQ cv ~ ~ U 0 ~ "' ~ W z • F 0 i! W W ~ ro a d a u ~u a ~ Q~ o ~ Mx ~ U a ~~ as U ~€ 0~ °~~~ • ~-- ass M M Wa w M ~, z x F .. ~o pi, ,,, ~ ~ Ha a ~ ~ ~u • 0 E U ~ Wz 0 M y ~ a ~ w ~ a ~ ~u a ~ Q~o •, U d x ~"~ U a ~C as U ,L~i~; '~\lP • H M Wa .+ ~, ~, z w x ~o F ~, .. ~„ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ z ~ Wz ~ F p a~ ~ a w wQ x U rh ~ U V U w 0 ~ Mx ~ U a ~Q ~~ U • °~~~' ~..1 ` H H V1 .., ~ ~ ;- y w .. Fz x F .r ~o p, a m ] ~ Nd U a a . ~ ~ F ~ W C7 z . p ~S "' ~ W ~ ~ a ~~ a a ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~x U a a~ ~a U "~7~. ~~~ i r p PLAN 3 Y • 4,224 SQ. FT. ~ PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES i.m+ = ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S II ^ ~.r - RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ~ PLAN 4 • 4,438 SQ. FT. ~ PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES vcua -- ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S I I ^ - RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ~ .~~ _~ FIRST FLOOR 1L~ I`~ vcu+ PLAN 4 PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES r C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S II ^ RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA SECOND FLOOR J L ;;;;, PLAN 5 5,000 SQ. FT. ~ PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES D ~=' C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA _, r • i • P J ,,.« a~~xnN vow SECOND FLOOR PLAN 5 PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA I I L r ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~39.~~~d~ „G., ~2y ^ • FBI H Wa N ~, ., ~, z a a+ a H ~ ~ °w ., z ] Fa p ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ d z,, 0 u W~ z a z a ~ ~ w ~ W ~ ~ a U d ~h ] V A a V .. ~ U ~ 0 E ~J ~ ~ x U a a ~ as u ~~J, ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ N H Wa ~, M Hz a F ~ O ~' .. 0 ~ d U a ~ ~ U ~ d w z ~ ~ C7 ~ F z . 0 a z ,~ w a ~ W d U ~h ~ 1 ./ U w tt U ~~ `4 0 U d x ~"~ U a ~ ~ ~~ U L7. V2lP ~ ~~ ~ ~~ $~~ ~~~~~~~ ~sa~ s~ ~ ~ ~ r M H '62~ Wa N ~, .. ~, z a ?~ H M ~ w z ,7 a 0 ] ~ ~ Ha U ~~ cv U z a 0 u ~ Wz a a ao E ~ 0 W~ a ., a U ~h ~ 1~/ A ~ U ~ U ~ 0 [~ ~ a ~ x U a ~~ as a u ~~i r AMXdy ®IRLOW WALLGR TW1COIiAMW WIIOORW IPOAATIICVIXI] CWlA~O WYdtOW iYOt IMCOMAIID) P ®ee~®®~ ~-- ® ..v ® ~~~ PLAN 2B _ "EARLY CALIFORNIA RANCH" ~' PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES vaxa _ ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA S S I~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~,~ ~, ~~ (`) PLAN 2C "BUNGALOW" ~ PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES vaw ~..s r C A R R I A G E E S T A T E ,~:,:~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA S I I ^ 9%,WOR fpllll SIIFCO~,®NMSpN09 Fpd1 u,smmc anrox®wnmpc li ~lM,ID A(~If WRL41 YR WId.LLI 9MIW MQmOw B01® m mvuntvwmoxewllm mmwvovamviws mcmvurr®.rantm vu~r av®muo C'r ®®® PLAN 2XA "TRADITIONAL COUNTRY" ..« o PACIFIC CREST, COMMUNITIES vm+ ----` ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA s Iz ^ ~ 1 LJ ~.~~ ..~ ~~.,~~ a w i PLAN 2XB "EARLY CALIFORNIA RANCH" o PACIFIC CRBST COMMUNITIES vcv+ --"- ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E ~_ - RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA S I I M ~~~~ ~.~~~ ~~ C~ W N PLAN 2XC "BUNGALOW" ~ PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES ~, ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I I ^ • • ~k ,A.~ .ATO».oA.o~ ix mr¢aeonm cwr wF..... aucx twnow+~ svmaf varow aom movamuTawmcweoAws oa Anowo:wmwaw. etucconueren ATmxm 1L AT VCfm9mpp W W ~ , PLAN 3A "TRADITIONAL COUNTRY" PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES vow ®'=° ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S II ~ RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA FJtIVlMi11LLLt IIIIROLIOMfMWE{II6V1 •l all"AIVJ~L F90WIlIm11 AWI@1M 6,~IbW VALLLM6 l,lMlR4.Q~W80MDfLOf ..1,10 WIWtl,Ot ,IIK(D.IA~,m a s ma .... 8 ® e e PLAN 3B ' "EARLY CALIFORNIA RANCH" o~ PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES -~ r C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S II ^ ~.W RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA ...1. _ • • ~_ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~...J L a3s W d ~ ~, M z a ~ ~ ~ o ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ U A 0 ~ ~ w d z a a ~ H z o aa ~ x W ~ a o W M U V ~ a ~ ~ ~ v 0 U ~ ~ ~ x U a ~ d a s 6 V ~L~~11 ~ „~~ wmwo P utox eosinevww ix mexmeoum uceHreu,vws eeic[IamoMUl SIeRfF11 Ypatpw]plVs movu ixn nuamon aoum oaoe•xovwoov nnc sncmnurrm~rmcm aunevaoosmvn ma , PLAN 3XA "TRADITIONAL COUNTRY" e PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES v¢ta _=- ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E - RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA .S' I Z ~ LJ ~~ >,~~>.~~ A®.. W,2YAI. YIWNIlYM A~„~. WRIUW WAIl<Ap IPARA (OTiA OABIEgRIGOQ,~ II`pAARI[ViIIO ¢OAAI0MY00Yl~Yt EIIKCO VLVIF- rV me ®e e ~~ a PLAN 3XB "EARLY CALIFORNIA RANCH" PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA S I I ^ ,~.Y,,,..,.~ ~~, ®® PLAN 3XD "CALIFORNIA COUNTRY" a PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES vma _ r C A R R I A G E E S T A T E ,,,,,,,w RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA i • S II- ^ C~ a~ ~vmi~ • r w' PLAN 3YA "TRADITIONAL COUNTRY" PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA S I I- ^ d e~au+ traQ~ ®® PLAN 3YD "CALIFORNIA COUNTRY" PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA S I I ^ - -• u C~ ~~,~ wmea enTw.ouusnmro 1%l ERBpMM ERI%19 BR1410~R MAID 61MfiRf PMWYBp%E\ m muixn+Rnrm%Irneouo~ wmw%%n sncmvRnrR¢p•,mxm xu •r~ooosmca PLAN 4A "TRADITIONAL COUNTRY" o PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES vnxi - ^ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I I ^ N ..~- .W~, ~~W.~~ vounm~vmaa OOOA I.NU WMWWiPP1 f111000'MA,~ED A A a ® em® ~ ~ ~® vcvi :~::m • ^ C A PLAN 4B "EARLY CALIFORNIA RANCH" PACIFIC CRES'I~ C•~6MMUNITIES R R I A G E E S T A T E RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA S I I ^ • ~~~~ ~~ a~ ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~~3 M Wa w ~, ., z x M bl ~ O H F ] ~ ,~ ~ ~ U A 0 ~ ~ at z U U W z ~ ~ aa F ~ ~ O ~ a o a ~ u a ~ ~ ~ 0 U ~ ~ N x U a ~ d a s a u ~~! ^ H N 0 E 0 ~ ~ ~ T~ Wd N .. ~, z w a ~ Ck o ~ ~ + M r ^. M1 y ~ ~1I F1 ~I ,^ v fl / z~~ m V . ~ z ~~ F Q a~ ~ a w ~ W a ~ U ~h ] V U U a 0 " ~ U x M U a ~ a Q' U C~J~ • ~y~ J P `~1^` V PLAN SA "TRADITIONAL COUNTRY" PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES __ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA 6111RRN W ®PIO MlO10NJD]mpgl rx ®raa~oum C®(! WTOWI. 0610 /Y~ Y/POOMB6® ID WRIAETLTl6®]Ilq~xq Cp Nm~Q4V~l,Ot 111R0~'MA®.,T(111® .. xG AT 11OW>Q74f I I ~J L r J y ® ~®® ooo® PLAN SB ,,,,, "EARLY CALIFORNIA RANCH" ® PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES _~ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S - RANCHO CUCAMOP7GA, CALIFORNIA 1 CII~[IRtP®k 3111gp 1!®fW~iC~ .LL~NI WIGW. AWtlrtYR1 •RtIDAf NISIOO A'11LG9 i[IY WRAMW W11~f OW1110~CIDONl11pt (11LmMMI® I I J p s -~ ® ~® ® OD O® ~ tp1N~ n00 ~41IY[R1®101m1 C01 Nm ~YmUNI~Ok SIYI.p]~4r,m ®n® PLAN SD CALIFORNIA COUNTRY o PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES _~ C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S - RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I I [~ ~ r ~~ LHPT PROM ~_ RIGHT RHw4 TRADITIONAL COUNTRY k LHPT PROM ~l~_ euNOwLOw LHPT PROM ~i ~'T' RIGHT RHA0. HARLV CALIFORNIA RANCH LHPT PROM RIGHT RHAR CALIFORNIA COUNTRY R.V. GARAGE v PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES vaw --- ^C A R R I A G E E S T A T E S II ^ ~~~- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA i • ~ PLOO0. PLAN n ~.J 1~'ul N M r-i u `s, C m 3 r E ~' w N a z a H " z ° ~ ~ a o w z ~ ~ ~ ~ w a ~ `~ ~ a n rrl W < ° z z ~ oa a U ~hh ~ V ° Q A U w •• ~ U ~ U P4 H U Q a H ~/ o x U ~ a U b~~ i "BUNGALOW" POOL ROOM PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES CARRIAGE E S TAT E S II RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA a~axnN a 8 8 e a 8 8 "EARLY CALIFORNIA RANCH" POOL ROOM PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES CARRIAGE ESTATES II RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA e~rtw voQa N N °CALIFORNIA COUNTRY° POOL ROOM PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES CARRIAGE E STATE S RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA II ~~N ~~i _~;_~ ~ -r: __~ ~ i ~ a ~ ~ ~ a W Z a ' ~ ' ~ ~`-- a a_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U / ~ ~ 'I i ~ ~ ~ I d r.' ~ ----i- ~ i~~q i i i ~ `_-~~- y r i--- r , ~ ~ ~ I i 1 ~ I ~~~~'~ ----4-- ~~~• ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ®~ 1 ~ 'r ~ l I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~, _ I f-,~- _ L _ U' DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:10 p.m. Kirt Coury December 4, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00618 -PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES -A design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 70 single-family lots on 47.9 acres of land in the Very-Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda and Summit Avenues in the Etiwanda Specific Plan - APN: 225-171-05, 12, 13, 20, 22, and 25. Related files Tentative Tract 16147, Conditional Use Permit 00-49, and Tree Removal Permit 00-35 Desion Parameters: The site for this approved Tentative Tract Map is vacant and slopes about 5 percent from north to south Numerous windrows existed on-site; however, some have been removed under the Tree Removal Penrnt previously approved by the Planning Commission. The site is bounded by residential development to the north, east, and west, and vacant residential land to the south. The site will be developed under the Very-Low Residential Standards of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan using the same houses built in Carriage Estates to the west. Five house plans are being proposed, with four different architectural styles; Traditional Country, Eariy Calffomia Ranch, Bungalow, and California Country. All plans have 4-car garages; optional cabana/pool rooms and RV garages broken into various configurations as follows: Plan 1 is single-story, 3,467 square feet, and features two attached 2~argarages. The plan is a four bedroom with a deNoption retreat Plan 2 is single-story, 3,802 square feet, and features two attached 2~ar garages. The plan is a four bedroom with aden/option bedroom five. Plan 3 is two-story, 4,227 square feet, and features a 3-car garage and one attached single pr garage, or an attached 4-car garage. The plan is a four bedroom with a teen room. Plan 4 is two-story, 4,405 square feet, and features two attached 2-car garages. The plan fs a four bedroom with a teen rooMopbon bedroom 5 with bath and astudio/option office. Plan 5 is two-story, 5,000 square feet, and features a 3-car garage and one attached single car garage. The plan is a four bedroom Hnth a retreat, a teen room and an office/bedroom 5/media room option. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: Maior Issues: The following broad issues will be the focus of the Committee's discussion regarding this protect 1. There are several lots where corral locations are proposed too Gose to the house on the same lot, which makes the lot difficult for horse keeping. Staff believes that greater consideration must be given to satisfying the intent of the Hillside Development Ordinance and Equestnan Overiay District, in addition to minimum Development Code standards. Staff feels that some houses may be too large for the lot and would recommend that a smaller footprint be proposed to allow the conal to be further from the house. In addition, the corrals should be moved to the most advantageous locations away from the residence while still maintaining the 70-foot separation from neighboring habitable spaces. In this regard, staff recommends that the corrals be located next to the trail easements. The corral should be \` ,~ located in an area that do not exceed 5 percent slope. This may necessitate retaining wall construction, as part of your site work, near the trail easement in order to attain this level. bS"~ DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00618 -PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES December 4, 2001 Page 2 Secondary Issues: Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee wll discuss the following secondary design issues: The decorative penmeter fence/wall along Summit and Etiwanda Avenues should incorporate large nver rock stone plasters developed at 30 inches squared. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval subject to the above comments. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Warren Morelion for Kirt Coury The Committee agreed with staff that there are some corals positioned too cose to on-site homes. The Committee recommended the applicant move these corals far enough awayfrom the homes to cxeate a logical separation. Since there is no minimum separation requirement, the Committee suggested the applicant provide a minimum of 8 to 10 feet of separation. Although the applicant expressed to the Committee that the protect meets all City requirements (setbacks, lot coverage, etc.), the applicant is willing to provide retaining walls on some lots to move corals further awayfrom homes d it would resolve staffs major design issue and allow approval of the project. The Committee asked the applicant to work with staff for final coral locations. The Committee asked that staff condition the applicant so that no cabanas could be located in proposed coral locations. r 1 LJ ~~ . RESOLUTION NO. 02-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00618, A DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 70SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 47 9 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AND SUMMIT AVENUES, IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 225-171-05, 12, 13, 20, 22 AND 25 A Rentals. 1. Pacific Crest Communities filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00618 as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 9th day of January, 2002, the Planning Commission of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recdals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows. The proposed project is consistent with the obfectives of the General Plan; and b The proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Speafic Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially m~unous to properties or improvements in the viGnity; and d The design of the protect, including home design, roadway alignment, trails, landscaping, and grading will provide effiaent use of land to accommodate single-family homes, and • e. The homes are tastefully designed with high quality architecture that will enhance the area These same homes were constructed m the new subdivision on the adtoining properly to the west PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-02 DRC2001-00618 -PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 2 3 Based upon findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The decorative penmeterwalls and fences along Summit and EUwanda Avenues shall incorporate large nver rock stone pilasters in its design. The nver rock stone pilasters shall be developed at a minimum of 30 inches squared. 2) Open fences less than 4 feet in height may be permitted within the setback area along Etiwanda Avenue (setback area is 30 feet average, 25 feet minimum) subtect to providing adequate sight line visibility for residents exiting onto the streets 3) No cabanas or RV structures shall be constructed by the developer in the proposed corral IoceUons. 4) The applicant shall provide a final noise study to address potential noise impacts and proper mitigation measures relating to the nearby . 210 Freeway. 5) All applicable Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16147 and Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP 009 shall apply. Engineenng Division 1) All Conditions of Approval per Planning Commission Resolution 01-03 for Tract 16147 shall apply. 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. ATTEST: Lany T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary ~J 47~~" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-02 DRC2001-00618 -PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretaryof the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C~ 6~ RESOLUTION NO 02-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00618, A DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 70SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 47 9 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AND SUMMIT AVENUES, IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-171-05, 12, 13, 20, 22 AND 25 A Rentals 1 Pacific Crest Communities filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00618 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 9th day of January, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission durng the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a. The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda and Summit Avenues with a street frontage of approximately 2,800 feet on Etiwanda Avenue and a lot depth of 1,360 feet and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subtect site is developed with single-family homes, the property to the south is vacant, the property to the east is developed with smgle- familyhomes, and the property to the west is currently under construction for single-family homes; and c. The project is designed in conformance with the Very Low Residential standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows ~S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-02 DRC2001-00618 -PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 2 a The proposed protect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and +~o ~«,.,.,..a., e..o.. ~.. oi.,., .....+ the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially infurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed project, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment forthe approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16147, the project is in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Tract Map. Therefore, no additional environmental assessment was conducted with the Design/Development Review. The Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16147 on January 10, 2001, which included an Environmental Assessment, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. This application was substantially consistent with the approved Tentative Map; therefore, no further environmental review was deemed necessary 5 Based upon findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Diwswn 1) The decorative perimeter walls and fences along Summit and Etiwanda Avenues shall incorporate large aver rock stone pilasters in its design The river rock stone pilasters shall be developed at a minimum of 30 inches squared 2) Open fences less than 4 feet in height may be permitted within the setback area along Etiwanda Avenue (setback area is 30 feet average, 25 feet minimum) subject to providing adequate sight line visibility for residents exiting onto the streets ,(j s7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00618 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN OF 70 SUBJECT: SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS APPLICANT: PACIFIC CREST COMMUNITIES LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AND SUMMIT AVENUES ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Cdy, ds agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, . Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan SC-11-01 1I~ \ 1 Comolehon Date -~-~- -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- Protect No DRC2001-00618 Comole6on Date 2 Revised site plans and bwldtng elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwldtng, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development _/_/_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall /_/ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of _ _ concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 7 All bwldtng numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 8 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and / /_ weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencng and drainage devices, in contunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced / / with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeled' logs to define both sides of the easement, _ _ however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as _/_/_ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora / / distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from _ _ _ reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Bwlding Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to _/_/_ trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, / / at least one model home shall be provided with a wnstructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral _ _ _ with appropriate fencing 9 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the _/_/_ equine animals where zoning regwrements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of dvectors of homeowners' assoaations for amendments to the CC&Rs 10 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/ Homeowners' Association are sub/ect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering ~ Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be SC-11-01 2 p~ Protect No DRC2001-00618 Comolehon Date C D. E. F. C~ provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of then officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 12 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and Ctty Engineer approval, including, but not limned to, public nonce requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the ad/oining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's penmeter 14 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of lwo %rinch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 15 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant 16. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views 17 On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk 18 For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry 19 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision Existing trees requred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading / / / / / / / / / / / / -/-/- / / / / -/-/- / / / / -/-/ SC-11-01 3 v~\ Project No DRC2001-00616 Comolehon Date plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and • tramming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than _/_/_ 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or _/_/_ greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single family residential development, all slope planting and vrigation shall be /_/_ continuously maintained in a healthy and thrrnng condition by the developer until each indroidual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Drnsion to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the _/_/_ Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan This requirement shall be in addition to the requred street trees and slope planting . 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be _1_/_ included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to Crty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 8. Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, _/_/_ meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along Etiwanda Avenue 9 Landscaping and ircigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on _/_/_ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, _/_/_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Landscaping and ircigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 12 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is regwred at a ratio of 50 _/_/_ linear feet per acre The size, spaang, staking, and vrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the _/_/_ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bwlding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report SC-11-01 4 v~/~ Prgect No DRC2001-00618 Comole4on Date H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _/_/_ location of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mad boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. General Requirements 1 Submit four complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit lwo sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requved prior to plan check _/_/_ submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls /_/_ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation _/_/_ coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/ /_ contact the Building and Safety Dvision staff for information and submittal requirements J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i e , CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Bulding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to _/_/_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, SC-11-01 5 ~ l Project No DRC2001-00618 Comolehon Date Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Drvisior prior to permit issuance Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of budding permits Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Mondaj through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays K. New Structures Provide compliance wdh the California Buldng Code for required occupancy separation(s) Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Califoma Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be m substantial conformance Nnth the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 The final grading plan and appropriate certification reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety offiaal prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. 4 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califoma Registered Crvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shalt be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garages or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices N. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner O. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- /_/. -~-~- -~-~- _/_/~ -~ ~- -~-~- -~-~- -~_~. _/_/~ 5~.,,.~, s 6t~y Protect No DRC2001-00618 ComoleGOn Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED FIRE SAFETY DIVISION CONDITIONS SC-11-01 7 ~ ~` `" 'Y."`..: FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT -yLLj ~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0548-A PROJECT #: DRC2001-00618 PROJECT NAME: Camage Estates II DATE: November 19, 2001 PLAN TYPE: SFR Tract APPLICANT NAME: Carnage Estates II, LLC OCCUPANCY TYPE: FLOOR AREA (S): Greater than 3,600 s f. TYPE CONSTRUCTION: Type V-N LOCATION: SWC Summit Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue . FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locatl, Flre Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Kart Coury ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire District regwrements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire Distract regwrements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review Prior to approval by the Planning Dvision a plan to assure compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be accepted by the Fire Safety Dmsion All Fire Distract conditions and comments must be addressed before construction perinds can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verity compliance. Items identified as "Regwred Note" shall be included on plans resubmitted to the Planning Division. A. Community Factlities Distracts Please provide verification that that the protect has been annexed into the Community Facilities District This information would be found on your Tdle report B. Water Plans for Fire Protection • 1 Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water District 2 The regwred fire flow for this protect shall be 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes one2fire hydrant is regwred per 1000 gallons of regwred fire flow V~ 3 The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 Public fire hydrants located with a 500-foot radius of the proposed may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 5 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering combustible bwlding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 Far the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shalt be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water Distract or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The budder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 8 Required Note Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of ReFlecbve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. Water Availability Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avadabd~ty for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow D. Fire Access Roadways and Fire Lanes Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obl~ approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets and courts from the Fire Distract in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to Flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise requred Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways tinthout prior written approval of the Fve District, Fire Safety Droision Required Note Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during wnstruction, in accordance with Fire Distract Standards New single-family dwellings shall post the address with mwmum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry E. Hazardous Fire Area Protects located in the State Responsibility Areas (SRA), or the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) are v~nthm the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District State Law regwres notification to be made Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map, the subdivider shall place a note on the map stating the protect is located within the State Responsibility Area or the Very High Fire Hazard Seventy Zone, as appropriate, due to wildland exposure The note is subject to the approval of the Fire District and is based on SRANHFHSZ maps produced by the Calrfomia Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 6~~ 2 Regwred Note Hazardous Fire Area Development- Pnor to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall meet all regwrements for development and construction within the Hillside Distract, the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ), and the State Responsibility Area (SRA) This may include increased street widths, on-site water supplies, fire-resistive construction, Class A roof assemblies, fire spnnklers, etc , contained in the Fire Safety Overlay Disrct Standards • F. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Regwred Note for All Maps and Plans) 1 This protect is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" based on proximity to or exposure urban -wildland interface Mitigation measures are required The bwlding(s) shall be constructed in accordance with the standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Oveday District- Area FR-1 or Area FR-2 2 Landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Fire Safety Division for review of proposed vegetation All groundcever, shrubs, plants, and trees are regwred to be fire-resistive in accordance with published references The plant palette shall include the common name for all vegetation The landscaping plan shall identfy all native species proposed for retention 3 Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire Distract approval of a preliminary fuel modificetion/hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an individual or Finn qual~ed and expenenced in wildfire hazard mitigation planrnng 4 Pnor to the issuance of any grease grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modificetioNhazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of nsk to the structures by vegetation 5 Pnor to the issuance of a bwlding permit or Certfiicete of Occupancy, the developer shall have completed, in cooperation Huth the Fve Distract, that portion of the approved fuel modficationlhazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire Disthct before the introduction of any combustible materials into the protect area Approval is subtect to final on-site inspection 6 Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel mod~cetion/hazard reduction plan shall be installed The Fire Distract shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modification areas Further, the installed fuel mod~cetion plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fve Distract The CCBR's shall contain provisions for maintairnng the fuel . modrficetion zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subtect to (annual) triennial inspections 7 Phased protects or temporary fuel modification plans must meet the regwrements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire Distract 8 For asingle-family dwelling pro/ect located rn the Hazardous Fire Area, a simpl~ed landscaping/fuel modification plan may be acceptable The plan shall detail the minimum thirty (30) foot minimum defensible space and proposed and/or existing vegetation The Fire Distract can provide a single page sheet of standardized notes for inclusion on the construction plans Call (909) 477-2770 to obtain a copy, and to determine d your pro/ect is eligible G. Combustible Construction Letter Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit for combustible construction, the bwlder shall submd a letter to the Fire Distract on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire Distract Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible matenal ~s placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times H. Fire Distract Service Fees' The following fees may be applicable to this protect and are being identified at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other regwred installations subtect to approval by the Fire Distract The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted When the regwred plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division " a $66 Preliminary Vegetation Management/Fuel Mod~a3tion Plan (Incudes SFR In-fill lots) b $66 Final Vegetation Management/Fuel Modification Plan and Inspection (Subdivision) c $66 Fire District Access Review (Includes Fve Lane Plans) d $132 for Single-family Residential Tract~(~p~er0.phase) l7~ $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection Plus a microficheAaser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division ' Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire exhngwshing systems, and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans The following service fees are due to the Fire Distract and payable at this time a $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) b. $ 132 -Total due at this time Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Rre Distract" "" Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Diwsion 'Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services urnt for revew of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant revews upon submittal of plans Plan Submittal Regwred Notice Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction in accordance vwth 1997/98 Budding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards Fire Distract Conditions of Approval- Template SL 10/24/01 Revision 6~ JAN-08-2002 1636 PRC I F I C CREST 909 945 7807 s ~ACI~IC REST COMMUN171 ES, 1NC. TRANSMITTAL 7CY PRUM Kirt Coury Carol Long Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Project Manager RE UA11 Carriage Estates II January 8, 2002 # of pages this transmittal: ~ ~~ Kirt: Transmitted herewith please find a copy pf the flyer distributed by the Lingenfelter's. Chris will be meeting with the Lingenfeltei's at their home this evening at 6:00 p.m, We've prepared the attached response to their comments, which Chns will go over with them tonight. I've also induded a copy of the fax trensmission regarding the wall at Lots 24-32 (7 foot masonry wall). I'll let you know how tonight's meeting goes (unless you change your mind and want to attend). If you have any questions or comments, please give Chris or me a call. Thank you. 4141 INLAND EMPIRE BLVD. • SUITE J45 • ONTARIO, CA 91764 Phcae (909) 945-7800 Pax (909) 945-7807 E-Mail tic ng®pac-treat cam P.01 JRN-08-2002 1636 PRCIFIC CREST 909 945 7~7 P.02 • Elevation of the lots directly across from our property exceed even the height of our btodr wall, Invading our privacy and completely negating the "cotirdry' environmerd that we were lad to bebeve that We r9ty was entxareging Lugo or no sidewalk w horse trail Basemen! on west side of Etiwanda Ave Developer being allowed to have homes facing away From Etiwarrda. Cel Trans representative reported io us that Uie developer tamed sawn puronastng the property directly somh of the proposed development ihus necessllatir~q the elevation of the pads to actammodete sewers going north to access pcirn The tan acres not purchased also preverk a freeway sound wall and through street from being required that will present when dnving across the Etiwarltle overpass wdl be homes on the east the avenue, nave walla that do NOT extend beyond the trans of the homes, and ndscaprig M1ltt horse trerls and parkways. The western homes, once beyond the Freld, ,narrow strip along the curb, sleep slopes, miromal landscaping, walls that begin al the and the Daclgrards or tames This is the ONLY place abng Ettwanda Ave, that -mrrtamed, walled-in neighhamand, rather than the open, country Wing that extends away, north. The Ettwande Specific Plen and Etiwanda Ave, overlay was Intended to es froth this type of development `~ from our front door, which faces Etiwanda Ave , vnp be a fieltl of dumped arrt and rocks, The piece of properly that will be bft after pacific Crest finishes developing the nerghboArood, belongs to Cal Trans We spoke to a representative of thai agency. He told us that they offered Padflc Crest the property, Ttrey ware tamed down, siting the expenses iMOlved In building the sound wall and flntshing Yntege Drive. Cal Trans told us that °someone In the governor's office' has dawn interest in the property for low•income, high~densiry housing. We were told that since the city, and the nerghbodng developer are not imerested in whet was orlglnolly supposed to house a hrstodc home, the slate earl do whatever they want vhth the property, by-passing zoning restrictions by the rlly It seams that the cFty's irraction and approval of the Pacific Crest homes may lead m a decline in the quality of living for this and surnrundmg neighbonc~ads a ctrl of the house across and above the street from us. While our home was to preserve coumry living, our wew will he marred by a deveopment that has not been to adhere to the lama standard Our pnvacy vnn be Invaded, by the house that Is not adlacem, but ACROSS the street Standing on that pad, one can see that you ere standing above the balcony of the house behind ours, which is north on Euwar~a W e will beat the Plaaaing Commission raeaiag ce laaaary 9, 2002, It u our iwpe, and the hope of our oorghbms, that these conccras can be addresvod at that time. Dena and Chory] I.irrgeafdter these are some oFlbe wocerus tivrt we would ltke to have addressed at a planning Coarwi~iua ateetinY on Jamrary 91°. Please~wo W tf you share thrsc eoocems "~V~..~VJRN~B-2002 16=36 ~VPRCIFIC CREST V^-V"W VV- u ~ ~~ 909 945 7807 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 1. Pacific Crest Commumhes, lnc. has worked wrth the City on the architecture and plotting of our homes to be consistent with the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The finish elevation of the pad across from 12902 Arapaho Road (our Lot 24) is 1463.00. The finish elevation of 12902 Arapaho Road is 1456 50. The difference between these two elevations rs 6.50 feet. By working with the City and our civil engineer, we are able to drop the finish elevation ofpad of Lot 24 nvo (2) fcct. Tlus will lower the finish elevation of the pad of Lot 24 to 1461.00. We have also compazed the fwsh pad elevation of our lots to the homes on the east side of Ehwanda Please seethe attached table 2. Per the Etiwanda Specific PLm, Figure 5-24, Etiwanda Avenue, U1e West side of Etiwanda Avenue is planned wtth a bike path with the equestrian trail being on the East side of Etiwanda Avenue. See attached copy of Figure 5-24. 3 The homes being plotted on the West side of Etiwanda Avenue are consistent with the homes built on the East side of Etiwanda Avenue. Please see attached table, copy of site plan showing layout of homes on both sides of Ehwanda and copies of pictures taken on 1/4/02 showing layout of the homes on the East side of Ehwanda. 4. Neither Pacific Crest Communities, inc /Carnage Estates II, LLC nor Lennar Homes was contacted by Cai Trans to purchase the property south of TT 16147. 5, Pactfic Crest Commiuuhes has worked with the City to provide an attractive street scene along Etiwanda Avenue from plotting of the homes to installing a nver rock/view fence at all lots south of Lot 4 (a solid wall will be installed at rho comer of Lot 3). The location of the fence has also been modified to provide more "yard" adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue (50-60% of the frontage is open space). Figure 5-26 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan shows the concept for the Etiwanda Avenue Streetscapa_ Jn addition to the front yazd landscaping to be installed, all of the slopes will be landscaped with trees, shrubs and ground cover Please see attached Conceptual Slope Landscaping Exhibit, winch shows the trees to be installed based on the City's Ehwanda Strectscapc requirements and City's Slope Landscaping requirements. It is also our intent to keep as many of the existing trees on Etiwanda as possible. Ties will be based on whaUwhere the site improvements need to be installed and the physical status (healthy) of the trees. 6. The property south of TT 16147 is owned by the State of California. Tentative Tract 16147 was approved by the City in January 2001. At that time, the layout of thc lots as well as the conceptual grading plan was approved We will work with Cal Trans on obtaining permission to assist in cleaning up the site south of TT 16147. 7 The property south of TT 16147 is owned by the State of California Cal Trans/State of California did not contact Pacific Crest Communities. !tic and/or Lennar Homes with regard to the purchase of the property south of TT 16147. As our business plan precludes us from purchasing unentitled pieces of property, PCC would not be interested in the property to the south P.03 SRN~B-2002 16 37 ~~ PRC I F I C CREST y~ 909 945 7807 P. 04 Carriaae Estates Elevation Lot 3 1523 2 Lot 4 1523 2 Lot 9 1510 3 Lot9 15103 Lot 10 1504 4 Lot 10 1504.4 Lot 19 1498.8 Lot 20 1465 7 Lot 21 1477.1 Lot 22 1477 2 Lot 23 1483 Lot 24 1463 ELEVATION DIFFERENCES East Side of Etiwanda Elevation Difference 12919 Summit 1530 -6 8 12920 Shasta 1522 1.2 6163 Etiwanda 1513 -2 7 6161 Etnvanda 1510 0.3 6195 Etrwanda 1505.5 -1.1 6233 EtMlanda 1499 5 4 6215 Eftwanda 1494 2.6 6251 Blue Gum 1486 -0.3 6293 Etiwanda 1490 -2 9 12902 Cherokee 1472 52 12901 Cherokee 1483 0 12902 Arapaho 1456 5 8.5 7RIJ-08-2002 16.37 PRCIFIC CREST 909 945 7807 P 05 J V JFYV-0B-2002 16 3B o.e ~-J PiiC]FIC CF7E6T RV„~ ~u~ P B6 JAN-08-2002 1639 PFlCIFIC CREST M fF~{~s14~}p~~n;8' ~` 1~'lan+d'b ilM~ `` bt ~ / ~ yA~>~ b ~pmlx }YPe Pi ~%-gl. ~~ F~S~ . Pd Row E'i1WANDA AVENUE North of SPRR/South of Summit FIG, 5-24 909 945 7807 .,,, itRie. alz. no Falrm ~~'i'In~ 16' ~ 6' ~.~ P.07 00 mix G ¢A ~'-10: REVISED 411!92 ETIWANDA AVENUE North of Baseline /South of SPRR FIG. 5-25 JAN-~-2002 1639 PRCIFIC CRESTV^~V u„ Vu u ~~ ORIENTATION OF HOMES Carnage Estates 909 945 7807 P.08 Front Door Front Door Front Door Feces Etiwanda Angled Towards Etiwanda 90 Degrees to Etiwanda Lot3 Yes Lot 4 Yes Lot 9 Yes Lot 10 Yes Lot 19 Yes Lot 20 Yes Lot 21 Yes Lot 22 Yes Lot 23 Yes Lot 24 Yes 2 5 3 20% 509'° 30% East Side of Elrvvanda Avenue Front Door Front Door Front Door Faces Etiwanda Angled Towartls Egwanda 90 Degrees to Etiwenda 12919 Summk Yes 12920 Shasta Yes 6163 Etw+anda Yes 6181 Etiwanda Yes 6195 Etiwanda Yes 6233 Etnvanda Yes 6215 Elrvvanda Yes 6251 Blue Gum Yes 6293 Etnvanda Yes 12902 Cherokee Yes 12901 Cherokee Yes 12902 Arapaho Yes 12905 Arapaho Yes 5 5 3 38% 36% 2390 ___. __ _ _ ,,,,. ~ ~ -. .anon wM u ~ Ra JAN-0B-2002 16 39 PACIFIC CREST ~~ 909 945 7807 P.09 u L Per Grote sections ~ ~tiwdrda Avg Planting Guidelines SkreettrcesGn public ~ow):perGrG~s-sec#~on tree schedule Fronk yard trees: irlfnrmal mix type e~o l4..ondon Plaric,~Mondzl! f'fne) T tree min./ 20 of rr~n ~,~'e 25~ of tree s~j ~ eat"~x size all o hertrees sha I be i6 c a~ min. ~r'on} yard 1arti~s~apin~ shall be supplemented by aPproprla~c shruk~ ~ g rou cover. FIG. 5-26 ~~ REYiSED 4/1192 Concept for ETIWANI3A AVENUE STREETSCAPE ~~y~..~yJRN-~-2002 ~16~39 H W W ~, d U zn d a o ~ ~_ ', F W z' o~ U i ~/ i --~ f dun Mo> />u/ _> H WCAYONGA COM OEV~ M10 PACIFIC CREST 909IIII 9457807 ~~ ~ ~l f I 1~ r j '~.3' j ,., ~~ r 1~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ J ~ .r P. 10 -- -- - - -~. eaa i i p yV LNMVrv Vq LUM UGV~ X11 JRN-~8-2002 1640 PRC I F I C CREST Fax TRaIVSMYrraL FROM MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES DATE OF TRANSMISSION: 1-8-2002 NUMBER OF PAGES ¢ncludmg Cover Sheet): ONE PLEASE DELIVER TO: NAr~: CAROL LONG COMPANY: PACIFIC CREST COMM[JNITIES FA7~I k: 909-945-7807 909 945 7807 P. 11 MESSAGE: THS LOTS ALONG SR-30 (2432) WILL NEED A NOISE BARR~'R 7.0' HIGH RELATIVE TO THE PAD ELEVATIONS (AT TOP OF SLOPE). SOME ROOMS ALONG SR-30 WILL NEED THE WINDOWS TO ACHIEVE A NOISE REDUCTION RATING OF EWNR=26 OR HIGHER (ROUGHLX EQUIVALENT 70 STC=18 OR tIIGHER). THE ROOMS NEEDING THIS WINDOW RATING ARE LISTED BELOW: PLAN 4, BEDROOM ~i2 AT LOT 25 AND LOT 27 PLAN 4, BEDROOM #3 AT LOT 25 AND LOT 27 PLAN 4, RETREAT AT LOT 25 AND LOT 27 PLAN 5, BEDROOM #3 AT LOT 28, LOT 31, AND LOT 33 ANY WINDOWS TIiAT MEET OR EXCEED THESE RATINGS ARE ACCEPTABLE. THE FINALIZED NOISE REPORT IS EXPECTED TO BE DONE LATE WEDNESDAY OR SOMETIIvIE FRIDAY. (T AM OUT OF THE OFFICE ON THURSDAY) LET US KNOW IF WE CAN BE OF FURTHER ASSISTANCE. MIKE ~IOLRIIZ, INCE SOUND TECHNICIAN MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 280 NEWPORT CENTER bRIVE, SUITE 230 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 PHONE: 949-760-OS9I FA$: 949.760-1918 TOTAL P.01 TOTAL P. 11 ~, r~ 12902 Arapaho Road Raridio Cucamonga, CA 91739 „,,,,<r... ~: :...s, ... ,, ,.xn.,,..r ..X'~,~„~~; d .::a Jt°s?.;., ,.....,. .,, aT~„ ,.RS^s~ yggo;a'~ r,.. va ~.,n ,', „~ .: , , :" :... ., `L5A`n a',. ': P•~:. ., .. ,.:ez u's.~' "".i~:: ,: ,::. rV~ ~+"a,~.~` ..`5 ~,:"<:°"r~~x~:~ "b„z, .,n.,.,.,,,-a,,...,:w....e..,...,',.,."<;Sa.,';,:<;n'w,:,:>;.";'..au.,~..,.,w,<,.'::..,"z.: '„c::,.:,~".,s`"a.o~,,,:,e c„•;,; .., `a"~:.','.:.". ,;,;.,~:`: gi~x°,S,~w,.,.'~. .,'Yai,'i°' 9NINNtlId - a3n13~3N December 27, 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga Plamm~g Department Dear Mr. Coury 1001T~~3Q d9NOWd~n~ oH~NVz .~ LLc~ Per our recent conversations, this letter is intended to outline our concerns about the housing development being planned across the street from our home There are several dams that we would like to have addressed. They mdude, but are not limited to, the following ~~.'<,' s. , ~",,Y>; %~w., viY -,;;h . • Elevation of the lots diroctly across from our property exceed even the height of our .,`°~>": ~-' i;~; block wall, invading our pnvacy and completely negating the `country' environment „• ~':;'.;~:~>'~ that we were led to believe that the city was encouraging tle or no sidewalk or horse trail easement on west side of Etiwanda Ave being allowed to have homes facing away from Etiwanda Block walls at top of slopes should be stucco and rock on east AND south facing sides to match other residences on Etrvvanda. T ,~a ;'`; `~ ..::'"Cal Trans representative reported to us that the developer fumed down purchasing "F'~":~r' the property directly south of the proposed development, thus necessdating the "" ° " elevation of the pads to accommodate sewers going north to access point The ten acres not purchased also prevent a freeway sound wall and through street from being required. The casual that will present when dnving across the Etiwanda overpass will be homes on the east which face the avenue, have walls that do NOT extend beyond the walls of the homes, and extensive landscaping with horse trails and parkways. The western homes, once beyond the field, will inGude a narrow strip along the curb, steep slopes, minimal landscaping, walls that begin at the top of the slopes, and the backyards of homes This is the ONLY place along Etiwanda Ave that promotes aself-contained, walled-in neighborhood, rather than the open, country Irving that extends from the 15 freeway, north The Etiwanda Specific Plan and Etiwanda Ave, overlay was intended to protect our homes from this type of development • The view from our front door, which faces Etiwanda Ave ,will be a field of dumped dirt and rocks, and the backyard of the house across and above the street from us While our home was constructed to preserve country living, our view will be marred by a development that has not been required to adhere to the same standard Our ,1.MM,..,.._" ., ,,,•;~t ,v~7[`SftYtf;.tty ttfditiouse that is not tacent, ut ACROSS the street ~7'E/1'l 1 ~ ~ December 27, 1001 Page 2 Standing on that pad, one can see that you an; standing above the balcony of the house behind ours, which is north on Etnvanda The piece of property that will be left after Paafic Crest finishes developing the neighborhood, belongs to Cal Trans We spoke to a representative of that agency He told us that they offered Pacific Crest the property They were fumed down, sling the expenses involved in burldrng the sound wall and finishing Vintage Dnve Cal Trans told us that'someone in the governor's office° has shown interest in the property for low-income, high-density housing. We were told that since the city, and the neighbonng developer are not interested in what was onginally supposed to house a hrstonc home, the state can do whatever they want with the property, by- passing zoning restndions by the aty It seems that the city's inaction and approval of the PaGfic Crest homes may lead to a deGine rn the quality of Irwng for this and surrounding neighborhoods We will be at the Planning Commission meeting on January 9, 2002. It rs our hope, and the hope of our neighbors, that these cencems can be addressed at that hme. sincerely, Dean and Cheryl Lingenfetter 12902 Arapaho Road Etiwanda, CA 91739 (909) 463-1206 • O F ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 9, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00689-PACIFIC COMMUNITIES, INC -The rewew of detailed site plan and bwlding elevations for Tract 15711 consisting of 87 single-family dwelling units on 1854 acres of land in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan and the Etiwanda South Overlay District, generally located on the north side of Miller Avenue, east of I-15 Freeway -APN 1100-041-09 VARIANCE DRC2001-00756 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES, INC - A proposed variance to allow a wall height of approximately 12 feet along the east and west boundaries of the parcel faang Miller Avenue that is not included as part of this subdiwsion, along with walls along the I-15 Freeway right-of--way that are approximately 17 feet in height to provide adequate noise attenuation for the adtoining lots, related to the final phase of Tract 15711, generally located on the north side of Miller Avenue, east of I-15 Freeway APN 1100-041-09 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 4 69 Dwelling units per acre B Sun-oundino Land Use and Zoning North -Tract 16105 -Forecast Homes/Low-Medwm Density (5,000 square foot minimum lot area) - Etiwanda South Overly District of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan South - Remainder of Tract 15711- Paafic Communities/Low-Medwm Density (5,000 square foot minimum lot area)- Etiwanda South Overly District of the EUwanda Speafic Plan East -Mostly vacant land with two older houses/Low-Medwm Density (5,000 square foot minimum lot area) - Etiwanda South Overly Distract of the Etiwanda Specific Plan West -Three existing single-family residences on large lots/Low-Medwm Density (5,000 square foot minimum lot area) - Etiwanda South Overly District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan ITEM C & G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRDRC2001-00689 & VARDRC2001-00756 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 2 C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Low-Medwm Density Residential (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre) North -Low-Medwm Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low-Medwm Density Residential (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre) East -Low-Medwm Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West -Low-Medwm Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D Site Charactenstics The first two phases of Tract 15711, south of Miller Avenue, are now under construction, with 24 units currently occupied The entire tract, including this final phase, was rough graded at one time ANALYSIS A General Tentative Tract 15711, which was approved by the Planning Commission in 1996 and is under construction, contains 283 single-family lots with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet and an average lot size of 6,000 square feet Design Review 99-08 included approval of the detailed site plan and building elevations for 196 lots (south of Miller Avenue) This development review application includes the final 87 lots in the tract lying north of Miller Avenue which have been rough graded No changes to the previously approved bwlding architecture were proposed All applicable conditions of approval and mitigation measures for the Tract approval shall apply to this Development Review approval and specific measures have been included m the attached Conditions of Approval. B Vanance The applicant has request a Vanance forwall heights in three separate locations on the protect site The first two are associated with the "Not-A-Part" lot that faces MdlerAvenue This lot contains an existing single-family residence including mature landscaping, a tennis court on the east side yard, and pool m the rear yard In order to protect the improvements and the landscaping on this lot, the east and west side yard walls adtacent to the new development have been designed with a 6-foot retaining wall and a 6-foot garden wall, for an overall height of 12-feet The grade difference is complicated by the fact that the existing residence drains toward Miller Avenue (to the south) and the new construction is designed to dram to the new mtenor street (to the north) Typically the Development Code would permit a 2-foot retaining wall with a 6-foot garden wall for an overall height of 8-feet The third wall location is along the northwestedy boundary long the I-15 freeway The Noise Analysis indicates antiapated wall heights of approximately 17-feet along the property boundary, decreasing in height along the north and west property boundanes This wall height is comparable to the adtoining sound attenuation wall, and the design will match It was recently constructed by Forecast Homes immediately north of this site Staff supports the use of the increased wall heights m order to protect the pnvacy and improvements made to the existing residence, and to provide forthe propersound attenuation for the future residents of this neighborhood from freeway noise All appropnate findings are included m the Resolution of Approval C Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (McNeil, Stewart, Fong) reviewed . the protect on December 4, 2001, approving the detailed site plan and bwlding elevations The Committee added a regwrement that the applicant provide a solid block wall along the north boundary (south side of Loire Valley Dnve) of the existing residence that faces Miller Avenue, this has been included m the Conditions of Approval C, G 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRDRC2001-00689 & VARDRC2001-00756 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 3 D Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on December 5, 2001, and had several recommendations regarding unit plotting on specific lots in order to increase traffic safety within the subdivision, including the following which have been included as Conditions of Approval 1) In orderto improve Ime-of-site from the driveways on Umts 1 and 61, the units should be reversed in order to place the driveway as far from the 6-foot wall as possible Once Unit M1 is reversed, the porch will need to be modified to the reduced width option, as shown on the approved budding elevations 2) All footings along property boundaries shall be designed using a L-type footing so that the block wall is located at the property line 3) Curb adtacent sidewalk is recommend along the northerly extension of Dolcetto Place to match the design used in the Tract 15711-1 and Tract 15711-2 4) Lot 13 shall be rough graded so that the sideyard wall is 5 feet behind the sidewalk at street grade E Environmental Assessment The environmental assessment was conducted during the review of Tract 15711 and all required mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Development Review approval CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all properly owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Resolution approving Variance DRC2001-00756, and adopt the Resolution and conditions approving Development Review DRC2001-00689 Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DM\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Exhibit "C" -Grading Plan Exhibit "D" -Building Elevations Exhibit "E" -Design Revew Committee Minutes Dated December 4, 2001 Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2001-00756 Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2001-00689 C,~G Lan -s ~ V~ I ~~~ -- - .-~ ~' OFC I ~ Y ~ Tlf a I City of Rancho Cucamaga I __ -/y Etlwantla Specific Plan I ; ~ , ~ ~ % (i _. ~I1 _ ~ ~ r ( I 1000 RADNS ' \\ OFC FIM ...,s ~ +I -- ® ~ ----~--- - ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~" ~~ ~~ ~ /i r ~ - / J •I !~ ~ 7 J -- llll _ I ----- I ! ~I` /VIII ~I ~ i . ~- ~ • ~, °.~ `, 1, "! ~ I t w c " ~ ~ . I ~' ~ _ bleat d Speclfi f _ _ .. h -----+---- -• - '' I (Co unity of ~ ,., I , '~ ~ © ' o -m P/OP 1 yr ~ I i ~ ~p AC i'/ ~~ ~~ K I 4 10 . © Y1.1 I I~ P~Q~ ~. ~ - r~ I 1C ' i - ~ ~ ,~. . ~ '. I 1~ Fbo~Bl® Speafic Plan %~, ,~ - f-j i ' ~ ,% P/60P ', . _ ~~_ I 'I:L~. ~I: ~' ~ ~ .I..I. ~ r I I ---- ~l 1 ~.~.~ ~ i •- . I1..... 1IMp ~ •• • •~L~ _ Site_ Utilization Map _ n. C ~ G ~ , o ~ ,~ ~ .,.;I Foothill Meadows -- y - Tentative Tract No. 15711 Da"Gaerro&,Assoc;n+rs ~Xfl/E3~ ~ Rancho Cucamonga, A. m"~"~"` ~om °'°''°"'G"" C 'E f ref ~~I E~yi " ~Ii 9 B~ I°~e ~~~ U U a !a ~~ ~~ ~g~ ~S® z a. z ca z a~ x~ aF F~ R. w U z 0 v F- U C F W .-. F d F z m F ~~,~~ 2~ @~_ 5 we :1.'-~ ~ °~i S ~h: 0 Pg ~ ~ ~~f s ~~ l0 z a v z ca a a U ..7 d F a w v z 0 U .~ .~ .-. F U a rx F W F d E- z w F Ni QJn9Clg1 !P[5 o-~.. ~-,.. °-.e ~ w o-~.:.-v.=4ti~- r~f~~~G~ik~i GR?.D I NG PL,~.N _ {~ , $ ___ ~, .~„ ` 4. ~.~~. s ~L: ._ ~~ pt~IM F~ ~~w~w ~'~'R- s PACIFIC ercw,aat vnn,rn nuo - ~~~:b~a..ne :~_.~ ---- f _.,i La Y Yppq .~ q 1 ~a~Z~ ~~~°w ~ ~i Viva u-- H ~ w _..,. ___-__ ., __ i~r~ -, -- - am.. ~ o~~.. n-- ~~ o~ _._ _ amw 3 --Ta- I c ~i ~~ o ri _~ ..~p. _ ate: ~.o, ,~ ~_ _-- - wvn Du,C TENTATIVE TRACT 15711, CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ~~ ~~~~_~~ _~ DETAIL SHEET ®_~ _:_ min y~ b 8 C ! _ • o s e ~~ ` ~ $~ o ~3 U a#' Y 1 s "N' ~ ..~ ~ €F .o ,ic e 4 4 pC 0 G E s x C A ^: i 6 i !~ e 6b t 1~ n E3 m i Y ~~ ~k 9 'r ~9 ~i ~ • z - 0 z J n ~ U v 0 6 m W Q F ~ _ Z Z p ~ _ ~ Q ~ U O ~ G U _V O LL = U U i a a n ~ C,G 8 ../ M`^, IIDO(PlTbld If YYP 1-p wflWdMO EARLV CALIFOgNU1 ~- -~. .^ e•P.n n.. nu ...~is~ Jat .u..vee...e.u.. .~,~..,. ^^ a ~...a, a.w,„. ....,..,e. N ~ ^.,,~~ ~~ ~~rE . ~., .:..,~. { - ~. r ~. .~..~ a...~. - _..r MOF Md10 1f EIPVd110f1 ~ 1(. •vr 1r w[nwln rar.rv ...om.r.. CALIFOPNIA RANCH ~-~ - - PACIFIC COMMUNITIE HA NCNO COCA MONGA PROD TI Aew uRi PLAN ONE n..... .,.eci.f.. u.. O b U~ _~ O ,. PACIFIC COMMUNITIES PR ODUCTI R ANC NO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ PLAN TWO - .....~ ~ 6 i CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW b a~.m~ ..~-~ esq. In.mn.~.rn. ~...nrnno- r. I18i y4 a...-.~mFN_ ry ~ .ue. wm I I • ~ n~rrol _ _ _ _ _ 11~1~ppFF %TCM 6 Ii IY~l~~ OVEM14110 vgawlE PACIFIC COMMUNITIES gANCNO CUCA MONGA 9 Pq OOUC TI ^, s~SA s. _.. PLAN TWO u..~ c.... ~ ~.~,m. e,. e~< i• t 1 I t~ !~ i a I ~:,xy/i~~ ,U-r s V z a a 0 J a v r ~i o 3 ~ 3 t J ~ a . k 4 o r a V ' W a i~~ .i ~. ~ _ .9-,OZ n ~ ~§ _ ' f U ~ p D ~f ¢ 3~3~ Y ~ f c ~y pl~i 3'v C, G 12 N W Q F (~ 2 ~ ~ O 7 ~ S O U U ~ U U ~ LL Y U 2 Q 6 • s fiXf~/.B~ !~-lP S e •. a~ 6 aa O P: m 7~ ~~ ~ J ;O a U ~~ ypypS~ O~ Qe i S C,G l3 d a a3 ~a n~ "s~ a a ig Ze 'o q w n'j0g ap FV~ SLL O Qe e i a yY 9y ~~ ~i y~_ 'i~ `~1 J w . w = ~: .~ Z a ~ J a .. Y t ~i o ;d a a w W a F 2 S O 7 ~ ~ a i U O ~ U U U O a U U 2 a a ¢ 0 a~ ;: ~~ ~~ ~. J- Z ~i a 7~ ~ ~~ a ,~ J 3 ~ U ~4 a; ~ ~~ _ }; 4 7 ~ i Y y 19 !i 9: dd a 8 8~ e J = 6 ~~ €; o i ~~ U ~~ 6 ~ W :g .: E~ ~b i~ W u W -° Q 2 H 2 Q J Q d . ~ r U 7 O { O ¢ ~~ O N W t F _~ 2 U 7 ~ 3 Q ~ V ~ ~ U U u o ~. _ U U = a n ~x~/i~~ t~-7 C , G 1y ~~~ ~~ C • E ~ ~r 'ss3t ~ 0 f 2 5 f p IQ 3 0 J k ~ ~ m ~ _ ~e ! $ o •y J U a ~. ~ ~~ ~~ ;~~ ~ yE a ° ; '` ~ ~ ~ Or RO § W9 .0-,9 Y C,G \S 3 I~ ~~ ~e Y ~ss ~Y 9~! Si a n .~~- o LL _ ~ a J ~ a S _ Y ~i ~. ol!i W < f ~_ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ U O ~ U U U O LL Z U U Z 6 < 6 Q a g z a F a P 5 6 _a z a O J t U ~ ~` F~ ~~ $~ ~ E e . d a B B Y ag ~~ ye E e ~d ;! $: t g U J Q6 W ~ • 7 LL t Q J i5 1 p a 0 ai Y Ij ~' W Q f 2 2 ~ ~ a ~ U O ~ U U u O t ~ U U ~ Q ~ 6 C C ~ ~ ~ lP ~xyi~rr-~-9 2 a ~ ~ ;~ ¢G A3 rs ~~~, ~_ a Y:~ _,• ~: Y ~ Nom} S~~'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. . d q~ 1 0 ~~ ~ @~ '~ o y ~ ~~ a U J .~ ~~ FQ Y ~~ yy~q ii ~7~~~ V ^a l .l ~,a. :~~w ;. ~, ,~ ~ 4 L C 3 0 "> °c: i >._ W Z o _ 6 ~ U ~i O 1~ O ~~ a N W 6 f (! Z Z Q ~ j ~ < ~ U O ~ U U U O LL Z U U S Q 6 6 y~ ~ ~,~"°,~ ~y~ ' ~1v/ r ~~ ~`~ '~s ;~~~~ ~i a a~, ,.9-,61 a tl C D e i Y O~tt ~1y 3/ f tr F i ~~ . w ~°h1 ``~^.n ! fC c i a~ ~~ ~~~~ , ''Jt v{i Y 9 8 e u C 3 m i W ~ O 5 2 a 3 6 ~ ~ f I p ~I p ~~ p { n It m W a f p Z p ~ Z ~ a ~ U O > p U U p a s U U 2 a a a `~ _~ ~~ b ~; ~ 7~ a 1~ .g ~~ ~§ C' V \~ 1 C~ d ~M ~4 d f B 6 e a° S e a m ~E a ~~ o '~ U JO u W .? ~W k$ S~ ¢q 9 a ~Y P i tr f ~ ~ ; r `c ~ C I~ St Illllfe~~~ l ~ J ~4Q ~ ~~ i ~~ ~ ~ a SP C, G ~~ c 3 J `o f W .j c p J a~ a y U ~9 O I~ O ~~ n N W a F p 2 p 7 ~ Z a ~ U p ~ U p U p LL ~ U U S a a a ~Xi4'/f3/~ ,t] /2 W ~ Z O y Z a J ~ C a 6 O LL J a U J Q a W C `~`o i :$ f~ k~ks 54 [~ B a d v ~ ti ~j i a ~E as W a _: ~ o ~ ~ ~ a ~ U O ~ U U U O u = U U 2 a a a C, G Zo I i 1' 1 iI a v a o ~ ` -_ ,~ ~, m a z ;'-~ ° f J Ja C~ ~~ ~~ 'a ~q e 9' 1 C, G Z~ Y ~; ~f ~~ 1 9 y~ fy Y~ 3F 0 L C i o~ 3 . 9 z a< ,. a, ~ FYI F U O ~# n N W ~ H ~ _ Z 2 G J .~ S LL T U U = t a ~ ~ • i Y I (~ t i i ~, ~h~/i3/~ I~ /~ uJ i 6 a 6 a4 C ~ G 2Z d iyy ~4 ~~°r.°`9 10 o~ 3 .: _~ J a H U O n Y ~~ d' N w ~ o i t O ~ Z ~ c ~ U O ~ U U U O ~ S U U = a < n ~ `_ ~J C~ ,w,... ..~~,..,.o..o ~:~. ~~ X~ I _~ N L' Woos nrcN a-i: Ir rrv ouenN~No CALffONN1A NANCN PACIFIC COMMUNITIES R ANCHO CUCAMONGA P PODUC 711 ~~ 9~ ..ow .o.. PLAN TWO N~ek feen~ A ~nnn~~~lnn Ine ~r.~ w~ti ~~ Y r I \ ~irH/,f3/T 1~-~7 i 0 i u T I ~ ~Y Y ... I'` S `~ ~ ~9 3~ C, ~ 2`'1 S ~I-` ~~! 6 J Y a p Y H ~i o ~~ o ~, ~~ a N W Q ~ ~ z z p ~ ~ ~ a i U O ~ LL Z U V S 6 O 6 ] n H G y V q ., f ~ ~. 8 'E i 9s 3 :a ~ ^- p m a ~ ° o LL ~ J U aF~ <m c U °1 c ~~yy~ W ~ LJ .g ~~a i #s ~ L 1 C 1 v ~J v Fv t~ Ze :~ IS ip l 6 I` } J W 6 n u'~ g=~ g i x] i ^~VN 1G~ O 3 . z ~ < ~ J 6 L = Y U p ~~ v 11' W a • p 2 p J ~ '~ g p O ~ U U U p LL Z U U 2 a < n a i~~ ~ • o. 3= _= a S J Y W S V S a a r a f 3 O J O ~._ ~~~~, a e s 8~ x .b 9 a yyC 1~ !i ~~ ~~ , a S a 0 a U J W y~ sU is v. Wr _i .~ ~t g5 3 C Y U `9 OO ;~ G N W a H ~ _ 2 = o ~ ~ : a ~ U O ~ U U U C LL Z V U 2 6 a 6 Q C. ~ vl ~~! • D ~: ~1Y 1y :E ~! 3 O J Q _~ m _6 2 0 J Q C, G Z ~ ~- r'~, a tit a{'~ ~~ . °~$ 3 O ~- r: w. w° a c x z a J o 6 ~ ~~ U O ~~ p ~~ a W a f p Z Z p ~ ~ 7 a ~ U O ~ p p U p LL I - U U Z a a a (( Y ~I 8 e 9 Fe ,~ S~ f~ i E W 6 6 9 a e ~Y ~9 ~~ 0 t • W ~ W 6 S _: f z 3 a ' a c y f S p o ~{ O ~~ 6 6 N W Q F p Z Z p s s c s ~ o ~ U p U p LL = - U U }. a a n a I I1 ~J ~~ ~xrY/Ph~ .n~z/ C , G 2 `d ~) ~ l !a ~ ~• ~ ~, ~~ ~ r '~ 5 i 0 1 `J ~r~/.Bi7`O-2z 7 E ~S~ ~` =Z .0-LZ i a ~~ ~ti~' 8 f~ 1 1 V m ~ ° i l' ., .~ Ea ~ ~b 6 a H y k S S s~ i 3 i < F U 9~9y 9i ~ J C, G 2~1 W e w x F z a J y v ~ Y f U 7 a ii o ~, ~~ a N W Q f V I ~ O ~ ~ I < ~ U O ~ U U U ~ LL Z - U U = n c C ~ • W u W ~ Q S ~ F 2 a J a =Y s~ ~b p v y p O O ~~ v F D i 6 ~ ~ ~ C0 ~ p .4 ~ ~ q W a F ~ 2 Z p ~ ~ ~ U O ~ U p U p LL = U U I 6 6 Q C, ~ ~ 30 b W ~~ ~~ ~~. x ...,a o a.... h- .,,~~o a a PACIFIC CON NUNITIE pANC NO CUCANONGA PgODUCT II PL AN THp EE - 4.rL 4ro.• rr~ n~ ..~ K-. Boor nre4s sx µlevaeon •3A' caun s a rvr wreeesro 'O'•1f1f ••^~ ••~•• , / Bonus --'s'.itd.-*ss~.on ¢nt ~,- CAIIFOBNIA BUNGALOW Sd ~` ~4 1 r F i Q -0] m T ~ • W c W ~ 6 ,' 2 H ~ 2 6 J `a d V c ~ 1- [ py p ~. a 9 a 3 9 kY ~j 9' Q Q 6 4 Fy~ l L old' WIt h p 2 2 O 7 ~ Z U O LL 2 - U U 2 C, G 32 ~xHie~r- ~-zs ~ i i a~, 2 ~ -9°i`" ~~ o i rr~ )f~ L 1 1 ~~;H I; .~ 4 4 y _ i ~~ z a l~ `- 0 5 LL J M ~ /1 i `' o~ Am =s ~, S ~ „, c ': ~ ~~ g> @Q B s a r ~Y Is ~i C , G 33 W i W ~ 6 "u F a ~ p n a+ ~~ U D ~~ O ~~ a w a ~ O z z o o ~ ~ a Z U O ~ U U U O S u U U S 6 6 a _[ ~ 1 i .~ C _.__ ~ YY~ ~ %i °6 a S c m 3 W ~ W ~ 6 ~ S H 2 J 6 vlY U ~ ~~ O '~ O O a e 8°e b; W t h C ~ O 7 ~ ~ U O ~ U U U O LL U U 2 a a a C ~ CT 3~ i yam. yam/ ~) T~rc/ /~~ 6/ ~ZC/ i~r ,,; ;p a ~I~ W. .-° _~ _° ~, ~~ ~° o~ °° Ci G 3S yl `~ n _- • C~G3lP DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.50 p.m. Debra Meier December 4, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00689 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES, INC. -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations forTract 15711 consisting of 87 single-family dwelling units on 1854 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, generally located on the north side of east of Miller Avenue, east of I-15 Freeway - APN 1100-041-09 Related file. Vanance Design Parameters• Paafic Commurnties originally received Design Review Approval m 1999 (Development Review 99-08) for 191 of the 287 lots within Tract 15711. In Apnl of this year, the Committee reviewed and approved minor revisions to the onginal approval. The applicant proposes to continue the use of this same product with no further revisions. The first phases of this protect are currently under construction. The final phase of Tract 15711 is that portion located north of Miller Avenue (Church Street), Huth a portion of the site abutting the I-15 Freeway. The Site Plan has been modified somewhat from the approved Tentative Tract The most westerly street connection to Miller Avenue has been closed, Hnth secondary access now provided by Tract 16105 to the north; Point Place now intersects with Loire Valley Dnve, rather than ending in a cul-de-sac, and anorth-south street parallel to, and west of, Point Place was eliminated. Vanance• The Design Review application is accompanied by a Vanance related to wall heights. In order to properly mitigate freeway-related noise, the wall along this portion of the site vanes up to a maximum of 17.33 feet. The wall is located on the tract boundary at the bottom of the slope The wall will match the wall that is currently under construction immediately to the north (Forecast -Tract 16105). In addition, a 12 33-foot high wall is proposed along the west boundary of the out-parcel on Miller Avenue. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: 1 The product design is proposed to continue from the first two phase of the Tract into this phase The applicant proposes no revisions, and staff has no further concerns regarding this product type. 2 The Committee must make a determination of consistency pertaining to the proposed revisions to the Tentative Tract Map. Staff supports the revisions as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 3. The applicant has submitted an Acoustical Analysis to determine the wall heights along the edge of the Freeway. The Freeway sound bamerHnll coordinate Huth the design established by Tract 16105 that is currently under construction 4 The wall along the western boundary of the out-parcel on Miller Avenue is proposed with a maximum of 5 5- foot retaining wall, which results in a maximum of 12.33 feet high wall condition on the out-parcel because of the difference in grade of the adfacent lot. The proposed wall will be approximately 70 feet from the existing residence, with mature landscaping that will provide a visual buffer. 5 The proposed plans indicate that the existing chain-link fence will be protected in-place along the south side of Loire Valley Drive, along the north boundary of the out-parcel. Staff suggests that a solid, view-obstructing wall be constructed along this boundary to protect the pnvacy of this parcel DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00689- PACIFIC COMMUNITIES, INC December 4, 2001 Page 2 Staff Recommendation Staff recrommends that the Committee concur that the product design is acceptable as approved, including recent modifications, concur that the revised plan is in substantial conformance with the previously approved Tentative Tract Map, and review the wall heights related to the proposed vanances; in order to recommend the project for revew and approval to the Planning Commission. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present. Lany McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Debra Meier The Committee concurred wrath staffs recommendation that the revisions to the Tract Map are in substantial conformance to the approved Tentative Tract. The Committee required a block wall along the south side of Loire Valley Dnve to protect the pnvacy of the out-parcel. ,:~Xf//.f ~T ~ 2- C t C~ ~ } 1 ##~ S T 'I 4 1 / ~ -~ !. '~, ` '9: ~. '~ `4 ~-,~ ;1~ _~ ~~~ ~~ ~, ,,, ;~ _; i ~ A 5 ~~;11 ' ~' 1;~~ a .! a: FF JJI !t~'!I ~kk'1 ~,~ \ '; '~ R ~ ''~6 -~ ~~ C ~ 3~ ~:~s~r,BCr-~ ~ ~ e RESOLUTION NO 02-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00689, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 15711, CONSISTING OF 87 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS ON 18 54 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MILLER AVENUE, EAST OF THE I-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1100-041-09 A Rentals 1 Paafic Communities filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00689 as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial eHdence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property, within a recorded subdivision map that has been rough graded, located on the north side of Miller Avenue with a street frontage of 1,327 feet and lot depth of 650 feet lying east of the I-15 Freeway, and is presently improved with one existing single-family residence which will remain, and b The propertyto the north of the subject site is Low-Medwm Residential Distnct with a single-family development that is currently under-construction, the property to the south is also Low-Medium Residential District with asingle-family residential development that is currently under- construction, the property to the east is Low-Medium Density Residential that is presently mostly undeveloped land containing two existing single-family residences, and the property to the west is also Low-Medwm Residential Distract, composed of four parcels containing three existing single- famdy residences, and c The protect consists of a site plan and design review of 87 single-family homes in the final phase of previously approved Tract 15711, and C, ~ y0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-03 DRDRC2001-00689 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 2 d The proposed protect is located within the Low-Medium Density Residential District of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan and the Etiwanda South Overlay District and has been designed in accordance with the standards and guidelines of the Speafic Plan 3 Based upon the substantial eHdence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the purposes of the Etiwanda South Overlay District in which the site is located; and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the Harnty 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed protect application, the Planning Commission finds that an environmental review was previously conducted for Tentative Tract 15711, and that all appropriate mitigation measures for the tract have either been completed or included in Development Review DRC2001-00689, and that the proposed protect is in substantial conformance with the previously approved tentative map, therefore, no additional environmental revew has been conducted vHth this application 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) Approval of this application is granted subtect to the approval of Variance DRC2001-00756 2) A solid block wall shall be provided along the south side of Loire Valley Drive at the north boundary of the ewsting residence that faces Miller Avenue 3) In order to improve line-of-site from the driveways on Units 1 and 61, the urnts shall be reversed in order to place the driveway as far from the 6-foot wall as possible Once Unrt M1 on Lot 1 is reversed, the porch shall be modified to the reduced vtindth option, as shown on the approved bwlding elevations This shall be coordinated with Engineering Condition No 3 C,~ yl PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-03 • DRDRC2001-00689-PACIFIC COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 3 4) All wall footings along property boundaries shall be designed using an L-type footing so that the block wall is located at the property line 5) A curb adtacent sidewalk shall be continued along the northerly extension of Dolcetto Place to match the design used in Tract 15711-1 and Tract 15711-2 6) Lot 13 shall be rough graded so that the sideyard wall is set 5 feet behind the sidewalk at street grade 7) All applicable Conditions of Approval and Environmental Mitigation Measures for Tentative Tract 15711, as contained in Planning Commission Resolutions 96-50, 98-53, and 99-82, shall continue to apply to this application Conditions and/or mitigation measures that apply specifically to this development phase include, but are not limited to a) The previous removal of all existing trees on the property by virtue of Tree Removal Permit 96-17 shall be replaced with . 15-gallon Spotted Gum Eucalyptus planted in windrows along the property boundary, in accordance with the Etiwanda Speafic Plan regwrements, to the satisfaction of the City Planner b) A final noise study is required for review and approval by the City Planner, pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits, in order to venty the adequacy of mitigation measures recommended for freeway noise reduction, including wall heights and any necessary structural modifications c) Review of the final map shall insure that no more than three lots in a row are at the minimum width of 50 feet, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 8) The freeway sound wall design shall be consistent with existing wall constructed in contunction with Tract 16105 immediately north of the site The wall design includes the following design elements a 10- X 4- X 16-inch split face block cap (Orco Chocolate color), the top three courses shall be split face fluted (Orco tan color), the lowest 25 percent of the wall shall be spilt face chocolate color, and the remainder of the wall (between the three-coarse fluted tnm and the lower chocolate color) shall be split face tan in color Engineenno Diwsion . 1) All applicable Conditions of Approval for Tentatve Tract 15711, as contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No 96-50, 98-53, 99-82 shall continue to apply Conditions that apply specifically to this development phase include C,G `l2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-03 DRDRC2001-00689 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES • January 9, 2002 Page 4 a) Construct Loire Valley Drive full width across the out piece, including sidewalk and streetlights Install street trees and parkway landscaping if the property owner agrees to maintain them If the property owner will not accept maintenance responsibility, install rockscape per Standard Drawing 542 The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of permanent street improvements south of the centerline from future redevelopment of the adtacent property If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate b) A Caltrans permit will be regwred for the storm drain connection west of Lot 46. c) Trees are prohibited wnthin 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drainpipe, measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 2) If the Planning Commission requires a wall to be installed along the south nght-of--way of Loire Valley Dnve, prowde retaining portions as needed to make the full parkway slope at 2 percent toward the street The adjacent propertyowner shall be asked whether they want a dnve approach and/or a gate in the well 3) Dnveways on Lots 1 and 61 should be located as far from the line-of-sight blocking wall on the "Not-A-Part" parcel as possible 4) Penmeter walls adfacent to the freeway nght-of--way, on Lots 43 through 47, shall have weep holes to avoid concentrating runoff at the southwest end of said wall 5) Public storm drains in side yards, on Lots 46 and 53, shall be designed to accommodate influence lines for houses located lust outside the easements Also, prospective homeowners shall be informed that no structures are allowed within the public drainage easement and trees cannot be planted vnthin 5 feet of the outside pipe diameter 6) Provide secondary 0100 catch basins and laterals for all sump catch basins 7) Do not install cross gutters where a storm drain is available 8) Provide mow steps to separate the Landscape Maintenance Distract along Church Street and Miller Avenue from pnvate side yard maintenance on Lots 3 and 4 9) Map shall annex to Landscape Maintenance Distract 9 C, G y3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-03 DRDRC2001-00689 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 5 10) Provide substantiation for receiving Transportation Development fee credits in the third phase, pnor to building permit issuance, or process a reimbursement agreement for the street improvements to Miller and Etiwanda Avenues 11) Plan check for the master plan storm dram reimbursement agreement shall be sufficiently complete to substantiate drainage fee credits, pnor to building permit issuance or final map approval, whichever occurs first 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dayof January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C, G yy COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00689 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 15711 APPLICANT: PACIFIC COMMUNITIES LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF MILLER AVENUE, BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Comolehon Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/_/_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The Ctty may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or Cdy Planner's letter of approval, and all _/_/_ Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _//_ include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan • 2 Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _/_/_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-11-01 1 CI ~' 1~ Prgect N O DRC2001-00689 Comolehon Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code _/ / and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall _ _ be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety • Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / I submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits _ _ _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ _ building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in _ _ _ effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / / with all receptacles shielded from public view _ _ _ 6 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall / / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of _ _ _ concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single-family residential developments, transfonmers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 Street names shall be submitted far City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map _ _ _ 10 All building numbers and indmdual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /~ including proper illumination _ _ 11 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of / / all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ _ regwrements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 12 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double / / wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the _ _ _ adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 13 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each / / support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two '/cinch lag bolts, to withstand high _ _ _ winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 14 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant / / 15 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between wallslfences and sidewalk / / 16 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 17 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be /_/_ manufactured products D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) • 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street / I SC-11-01 2 ~(~ 1~ Protect No DRC2001-00669 2 On Flag tots, use a 12-foot driveway within flag to maximize landscape area Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision ~ 2 Ail private slopes of 5 feet or more to verttcal height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than ~ 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped wdh appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall tnclude a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy ' 3 Ail private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their ' appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground ~ cover In adddion, slope banks in excess of 8 feet m verttcal height and 2 1 or greater slope ~ shall also tnclude one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees ~ and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall tnclude a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single family restdenbal development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each ~ individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those ' units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition * I 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the i Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan Thts regwrement shall be in addition to ~ the regwred street trees and slope planting j 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be ~ included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be • ~ required by the Engineering Division - ~ 7 Landscaping and imgation systems regwred to be installed wthin the public right-of-way on ~ the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer i 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located to public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 9 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of I Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code '; 10 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping wthin the freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Cdy Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed ~~ ~ prior to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the '; Caltrans right-of-way ~•` Environmental ' 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise SC ~11-01 3 c I G ~ ~- Comolehon Date I / / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- Protect No DRC2001-00689 Comolehon Date attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the butldmg materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be I • checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report t Other Agencies i 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _I_/_ locatton of mail boxes Multi-family restdenttal developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to ~ the tssuance of building permits / nPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, F>jIR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F ` General Requirements ~ 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following / / --- ~ a Sde/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, ' c Floor Plan, I d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils _/_/_ report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation _/_/ coverage to the Ctty prior to permit tssuance Site Development I 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be /_/ i marked with the project file number (i e , CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the ~ latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, . i National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ~ ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the ., Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable ~ handouts 2 Prior to tssuance of bwlding permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mayor addition to _/_/ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees ~ may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Dmsion prior to permit issuance SC:,_01 4 Ci ~ _If~ Protect No DRC200'I-00689 Completion Date 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tracUparcel map recordation / / and prior to issuance of building permits --- 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with nc construction on Sunday or holidays J. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances _/ / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness -- 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for regwred occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions / / K. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City _/_/_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / / pertorm such work --- 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at _/ / the time of application for grading plan check -- 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building _/ /_ pennds 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• L. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _/_/_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are _/_/_ within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices I _/_/ M. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be / / lifted from frame or track in any manner -- 2 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or _// prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire .N. Building Numbering - 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reFlective for /_/ nighttime visibilily S~_„~1 5 C, ~ y~ Protect No DRC2001-00689 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Community Facilities Districts 1 This protect is subtect to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District I I P. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to Issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the _/_I_ locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Prior to the Issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ specfications, Flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Flre flow requrements for this protect shall be 1,750 gallons per minute at a minimum _/_/_ residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Flre Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any _/_/_ combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the Installation and witness hydrant Flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 5 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be _/_/~ conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The budder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 8 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 800 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water /_/ plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 7 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 8 Prior to the Issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue _/_/_ reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Q. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate _/_/_ fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avaifabilrtv for Fve Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If suffiaent water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow R. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic / / fire sprinkler system --- SC-11-01 g CIS ~~ Protect No DRC2001-00689 2 Required Note Prior to the recordati stating that all commercial structures Occupancies with an occupant load structures, and all structures which do "E" -Fire Access), shall be protecte approval of the Fire District Comolehon Date on of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map _/_/ great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential not meet Fire District access requirements (Section d by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic I _/_/_ fire sprinkler system to the Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permd 4 Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested / / and accepted by the Fire Distract --' S. Fire Access 1 Residential Pnor to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain _/_/_ approval of the Fire District for all Fire Distract access roadways and fire lanes All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 2 Residential & Commercial Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall _/_/_ submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional wew, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CCBRs, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 3 All portions of the faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located _/_/_ within 150 feet of Fire Dtstnct vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior building openings 4 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, _/_/_ a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 5 Provide secondary egress/access in accordance with Fire Dtstnct standards Dead-end _// roadways shall not exceed 600 feet in length Loire Valley Drive, from the center line-of- sight, Dolcetto Place to Tuscany Place, and the terminus of Firestone Drive creates adead- end of roadway in excess of 600 feet All structures using the above noted route fro access shall be provided with an approved residential automatic fire sprinkler system to mitigate access 6 New residential buildings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting _/_/ background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry T. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Requred Note Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit for combustible construction, the _/_/ builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site SC-11-01 7 ~ I l7 V I Protect No DRC2001-00689 Comole6on Date U Architectural Building Plans Prtor to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a bwlding permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Dtstrict Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal V Fees Fire Dtstrict fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Ftre District as follows " $132 for Water Plan Review for Publtc Fire Protection $132 for Single-family Restdentiai Tract (per phase) W "Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant rewews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans Plan Submittal Required Notice Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant tmprovements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submtttal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submtttal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing bwldtngs where tmprovements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer / / / / / / -/-/- _/_/~ S~_„-0, 8 C, G sZ RESOLUTION NO 02-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2001-00756 TO ALLOW A WALL APPROXIMATELY 12-FEET IN HEIGHTALONG THE EAST AND WEST BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL FACING MILLER AVENUE THAT IS NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION ALONG WITH WALLS ALONG THE I-15 FREEWAY RIGHT- OF-WAY THAT ARE APPROXIMATELY 17-FEET IN HEIGHT TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE NOISE ATTENUATION FOR THE ADJOINING LOTS RELATED TO THE FINAL PHASE OF TRACT 15711, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MILLER AVENUE, EAST OF THE I-15 FREEWAY, IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1100-041-09 A. Recitals 1 Pacific Communities filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2001-00756 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial eHdence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to propertywithin a recorded subdivision map that has been rough graded, located on the north side of Miller Avenue with a street frontage of 1,327 feet and lot depth of 650 feet, lying east of the I-15 Freeway, and is presently improved with one existing single- family residence which will remain, and b The propertyto the north of the subtect site is Low-Medium Residential Distnctwith a single-family development that is currently under-construction, the property to the south is also Low-Medium Residential Districtwith asingle-family residential development that is currently under- construction, the property to the east is Low-Medium Density Residential that is presently mostly undeveloped land containing two existing single-family residences, and the property to the west is also Low-Medium Residential District, composed of four parcels containing three existing single- family residences, and S3 C,G PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-04 VARIANCE DRC2001-00756 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES January 9, 2002 Page 2 c The protect consists of a site plan and design review of 87single-family homes in the final phase of previously approved Tract 15711, and d The proposed protect is located within the Low-Medium Density Residential Distnct of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Etiwanda South Overlay District, and has been designed in accordance with the standards and guidelines of the Specific Plan, and e. The Vanance Is requested for overall wall heights that exceed the maximum allowed by the Development Code for three specific locations within the tract 1) a wall height of approximately 17 feet is required along the freeway In order to attenuate noise for the future homeowners, 2) a combined retaining wall and garden wall of approximately 12 feet will be constructed along the west property boundary of the "Not-A-Part" parcel that faces Miller Avenue, and 3) a combined retaining wall and garden wall of approximately 12 feet will be constructed along the east property boundary of the "Not-A-Part" parcel that ices Miller Avenue, and f The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan indicates noise levels exceeding 65 DBA along the I-15 Freeway 3 Based upon the substantial e~ndence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 . above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows• a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code because residents living near the freeway would be subtect to excessive noise levels without the increased wall height, and the existing home facing MIIIerAvenue would be subject to disturbance by off-site grading and loss of privacy without the retaining wall and garden wall proposed by the applicant b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties In the same district because the site is adtacent to the I-15 Freeway, subjecting the site to excessive noise levels, and the existing residence on Miller Avenue should be preserved without disturbance to the exsting residents c That stnct or literal Interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprive the applicant of pnvileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distnct because a standard 6-foot wall height would not provide adequate noise attenuation and a standard 6-foot wall, with 2-foot retaining wall, would not provide adequate privacy and property protection to the existing residence on Miller Avenue d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege Inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same distnct because all residents In the City should be protected from excessive noise and the existing resident should be protected from the physical impacts of the adtacent development e That the granting of the Variance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity C I ~- ~~ ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-04 VARIANCE DRC2001-00756 -PACIFIC COMMUNITIES . , ~ January 9, 2002 Page 3 4 The Planning Commission herebyfinds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categoncellyexempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Gwdelines. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning 1) The freeway sound wall design shall be consistent with the existing wall constructed in contunction with Tract 16105 immediately north of the site The wall design includes the following design elements a 10- x 4- x 16-inch split face block cap (Orco Chocolate color), thetop three courses shall be split face fluted (Orco tan color), the lowest 25 percent of the wall shall be spilt face chocolate color, and the remainder of the wall (between the three-coarse fluted tnm and the lower chocolate color) shall be split face tan in color . ,' 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY j Larry T McNiel, Chairman f ` ATTEST ~ Brad Buller, Secretary rl ~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ~ certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the ` I Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning I Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-vnt ` AYES COMMISSIONERS ~~ NOES COMMISSIONERS `, ABSENT COMMISSIONERS :~ C,~ 55 T H E C I T Y O F R A N G h O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: January 9, 2002 T'0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECTS: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 - PIEDRA DEVELOPMENT CO - A request to subdivide 9 23 acres of land into 15 single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road -APN 1061-561-02 Related file Tree • Removal Permit DRC2001-0085 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00584 - PIEDRA DEVELOPMENT CO -The design review of house elevations and detailed site plans for 15 lots on 9 23 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling unts per acre) located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road -APN 1061-561-02 Related file Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00585 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 1 63 units per acre (gross), 1 97 unts per acre (net) B Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North -Single-faintly tract, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) South -One single-faintly house and vacant land, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East -Single-faintly tract, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West -One single-family house and vacant land, Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling unts per acre) C General Plan Designations Project Site - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Equestrian Overlay District North -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Equestrian Overlay Distract • South -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Equestrian Overlay Distract East -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Equestrian Overlay District West -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling unts per acre), Equestrian Overlay Distract ITEMS D & H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00584 PIEDRA DEVELOPMENT . January 9, 2002 Page 2 D Site Characteristics The site is vacant and slopes to the south at lust over 8 percent grade Remnant windrows are evident along the north and south property lines and running north south through the middle of the site ANALYSIS A General A single local street is proposed between the west side of Archibald Avenue and an extension of Klusman Avenue, north of Hillside Road. The proposed average lot size for the tract is 22,450 square feet, ranging from 20,024 to 27,648 square feet The applicant is proposing to construct 15 single-family homes that will range in size from 3,140 to 4,750 square feet. Each house has a different floor plan and architectural elevation and they exhibit significant levels of quality design. The site is within the Equestrian Overlay District and is subtect to its standards for the inclusion of local and community trails. Under the new Very Low Residential standards the lots have a minimum depth of 200 feet. B Neighborhood Meetings The applicant invited surrounding residents to neighborhood meetings on December 11, and 17, 2001 A total of nine people attended the two meetings, and while no specific obfections to the protect were noted, the following • specific concerns were discussed: 1 Construction activity during windy weather (Soil erosion mitigation measures are proposed) 2 A number of neighbors stated that they didn't want Blue Gum (Eucalyptus Globulus) planted, as there are already too many around the site One attendee didn't want replacement trees that could get as tall as a Blue Gum. The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance regwres replacement with Spotted Gum trees (Eucalyptus Maculata) that grow 50-75 feet tall, as compared to 200 feet for the Blue Gums 3 A neighboring property owner wanted access from his backyard through the trail fence to the rear yard easements along the north property line. The applicant stated he was willing to include agate/moveable fence section to accommodate the request Refer to Trails Advisory Committee section regarding trail improvement recommendations C. Trails Advisory Committee The Committee reviewed the proposed trails plan on December 12, 2001 The location of the 15-foot private "local feeder trail" easements along the rear of each lot (extending between Archibald and Klusman Avenues) and the improvement of the Community Trail along Archibald were recommended for approval In addition, the following recommendations were included That the trail easements be widened to 20 feet at the entry points off Archibald and Klusman Avenues (Lots 1, 8, 9, and 15) in order to accommodate a vehicle gate with side access per Feeder Trail Transition City Standard Plan 1006-B. Further, a recommendation should be made to the Engineering Division requesting curb cuts from the public streets at the intersection of the Community Trail and the feeder trail ~~ N a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00584 PIEDRA DEVELOPMENT January 9, 2002 Page 3 transitions to allow for supply vehicle access to the pnvate trail easements Said standard improvements shall be implemented pnor to occupancy In addition, signs should be provided at the private trail entries notifying the public of trail use prohibitions (i a ,motorcycles, ATVs, etc ) The pnvate trail fencing should be provided along the outside easement line with continuous 2-rail PVC trail fencing similar to that required along the Community Trails Penmeter tract walls should be located inside the easement line on each lot with a 10-foot wide lockable gate 3 Also, the Committee commented that the Archibald Community Trail crossing at the new street should be provided with a rough finish (non-slippery) for the safety of horses and nders D Design Review Committee The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project on December 18, 2001, and the project was recommended to be forwarded to the Planning Commission with the following comments 1 The Committee concurred with all the staff recommendations and approved the proposed color and matenals samples 2 The Committee concurred with all the recommendations of the Trails Advisory Committee and added that signs should be added at the trail entnes identifying them as pnvate easements E Technical Review Committee The Technical Revew Committee reviewed the protect on December 19, 2001 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions contained in the attached Resolutions of Approval F Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on December 18, 2001 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to the following 1 That the trail along the south property line should be graded northerly at 2 percent to the gutter that drains to Archibald Avenue A 5-foot high retaining wall (with trail fencng along the top) at the southern tract boundary, at Lots 11 and 12, may be necessary and acceptable 2 Show potential corral locations on the Grading Plan with access paths from the lower/higher portion to the corrals (for those houses that do not have exits directly on to the corral levels) The paths should be located/graded for easy access by property owners to the corrals G Tree Removal Permit A permit (DRC2001-00585) has been submitted requesting the removal of 50 Eucalyptus Globulus trees from the site A certified arborist prepared a Tree Inventory and Evaluation The trees along the south boundary (29 trees) are actually off-site, located on the adtacent property to the south, and therefore not impacted by the proposed development The remaining 21 trees are generally of poor ~p= N3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00584 PIEDRA DEVELOPMENT January 9, 2002 Page 4 form, damaged from winds, topped at 15-25 feet in height, or are sprouts from stumps Staff recommends that the Tree Removal Permit be approved by the Planning Commission with the standard windrows replacement regwrements being incorporated into the final planting plan H Environmental Assessment The Initial Study has been completed (Exhibit "M") Staff determined that the protect could have significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air and water quality dunng construction, and biological resources because of tree removal Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce the short-term air and water quality impacts to a less than signficant impact, and to require tree replacement. If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within an expanded 300-foot radws of the protect site (Exhibit A) I RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative f Tract 16262 and Development Review DRC2001-00585 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration i Respectfully submitted, I ~ Brad B r ~ City Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location/Notification Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C"- Grading Plan i Exhibit "D"- Natural Features Map Exhibit "E" - Site Plan with corral locations Exhibit "F" - Phasing Plan ! Exhibit "G"- Conceptual Landscape Plan "~ Exhibit "H"- Roof Plans Exhibit "I" - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit "J" - Master Plan Concept Exhibit "K" - Design Review Committee Action dated December 18, 2001 Exhibit "L" - Trails Review Committee Action dated December 12, 2001 Exhibd "M"- Initial Study Resolution Approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 Resolution Approving Development Review DRC2001-00584 D~Hy ~~ } il A sj H '' 3 _ , } .W _ _ ~- `E ~~„~ ~, N ~~ .~7,~ S'lfe~JS ~L `~ CEN~H ` " ~-lTE' r. _ Q7 ~ T ~ ~tYt N C .) I i ,,9~~ ..U ai Nx~ rm~ `s `~ ~ i 8 9.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ _ ~S _~ ~~~ ~ .~ ~ E~~ ~~~ ~aa°~ ~~~ N ~°~ ~. z~ !~@~ ~• ~~ a E~ a 5 C~ 4s S~ 45 ._ c~ ~. €~ r ~~ ~~' °z 3eQ B~ ~s a. 6§ ~- L5 a~ C5 C5 C~ ~~ ._ ~ ~ a-o-~ . , -~ __-~ I R I ~ q '~~ ~ ~ I • ~r j i ~ i ~ j i I i ~ ! ~~ ' i i ~ ~ ! i I I k~ ~. I I ~ j i° E i I ' I i ~~ I i I ' ' 'I I ~ umrt ' i I-------~ ~ i ii gg ~ ~ / j I~d 6F i~ I ~ i ~I ! I i -I-r------~ I i I ' ' it ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~~ i I ; ' ~ ~ I I II ' u ~ I -r~r-- ~ i ~ I i r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ i -1-~-,-_~J-a I i ~' ~ ~~ I . ~ i ~d , ~ ' ~'-~ `` iii, _ _ ~ 3, t. . !k ~ e c gg ~ ~, 9~ . ~ t . 1i i ~ '~ ~ ~ a `! ~ 9 d ~: R ~~ ~q iiiz !~°0 a ~I ~~ 4 ~ F ~ a~ HBS ENGINEERING SI ,~ .~,R ~„~ m, EF ~ i ^ I4~6 ~ ~~ ~ e~~ E i ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~€ ~~ ~ ~! p i ~ ~ ~~ e q ~E x ~~ g g ~ Bi M /I~i~ h ~ r p~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ z 9#~d ~ ~g~~~ie aag: qB ~o$~ qq a ~B ~g ~ e ~~ ::aa p e4 ~~~v R 1 1¢ A~~a ~ E 3\\\ 1 I i 1 €E ~~a ~~ ,, ~:~~~ ~~~e ~~~a i' B~° p 3~~ ~ ~~ ~` '. I ,i ~~~~~~01 g i i tied r g!~ ~~~~~~ "ir E~4i ~, ~~~',~ 9 YNl8d1 PIT®,iNP s = s !~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 'o~~ d~ coNCerTUU, clunac eul+ HBS ENGINEERING SERVICES + ~ f i ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~PC~/ OP TENTdTfYB TRAL7 18292 (~~_~ J '10]t MlalV¢ AYQN4 9Ud9 PPi !9 N pFa F a z F 0 w z _~, laz urns sneer s~ow~m emc S~~IA2I~S ~NI2I~~KI~N~ SHH e ge t ~ Q e s u, e w1 } g g~ 9 ~;?ai; ~~~e r gee, aag~~ e ., ~ ~p ~ iPe SEp~~ ~ ee~}i ~a Fqg e 6 ea ep 7~ ~ as ~h ~~h~ ~~~ e ~~~i~~3~p;p~~~ leE 64 s ~~~~~€.~~~f 9~ 0 E ~~ a a .`y _~ ~: a h 1 ~ " ! Y e. ~ r ~ a ~ ~~ @gpp599S pppp t ;E "F~ gS ~ ~; ~ e qq4 i ~ i e~ pfi y~e~ 6h ~ 9~ a S~1 ~ @~ ~~@ iCG $ h4 ~~ ~~~ a~ ~ ~~ ~5 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~P ~ ;~ ~ ~g~~~ ~~ ~ ~ , yea ~~ ~;~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ k h ;~~€~ py~~~~p a~g~ ~ €!g5 ~ ~p~sp~l~ 5 ~ e ~~~~ €'-qF ~r F7 a ds ~ ay~;Q ~~ ~ ~~ e 6 c e h e ~@ k A ~ kJ ~i y~ gg yy y ~ ~4J e s end Pa ~8 ~j~~6 ~~1 i p@~ ~7$~~~K a pEae ~; ~ ~~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~3y 8 h n ~~ 5p~pps`y~ ~~p ~ 1F Y~@y P 6@ ~~ ~ s~ 4 h a~ ~ ~~= k ShgF@@fPAAAs !"~91 ~ Z@ g R ~• ~ ~'~~ { n a ~E~~~~h~~~~~.~„ ~ ~f~ y~p ~I~~~ ~ ~c; ~~ ~a. ¢ ~ 9 s ep" ~~ p~hh ~~ P ph ~~~I'~~~kaP~@~~~~~~~Y98@i~~sS~4~~E~i eG k h# 9 d a EC e gg~ e aria @@~ 4 ~ a= a ~a a~ e8 ~~ a a ~3~ ~~ a~ 6 : . . k f e e k a i e e e s a e "pcN a 29dai .L~%L aeuvddru I ._ ._._E1v RIPeaCINP le I! I I II II 'I d0 Nfid 9tHHYH9 SSaH4QV HHt ~ 1 ~ I i Y h ~~ ...u . ,'}~ B E; ~ ~. ~F ~. ~ I ~~ a ^, o a W W~ x N• N• w ~_ a W. Z o. ~- W N S. N 9 a~ 0 9 s~e s ~ i ~~~ ~ s ~ i y~y Is pehg'g4C 4 ~ a QA9! 6 I~ ~ ~4~~ ~ ~ ~6~~ 8 gas aqa g C~2 one-+»ca.o) aoruaon mop lramvrv ~ r~ ...,,. aaas. no~aw zca. /umavcuaa ra°ata xaxao ~) ! I Sff~IA2IffS `JAII2IffffAII`JI~Iff SffH ~°raa u'~ne86s`wm~us ~''sssaa°Na'eo ! I I I ~ ~ a v ' ~ ~ 6 N 1 ~ 7 ~ W ~ ~ [tGi~a ~ W ~~ ~~ ee . 4 ~ f ~ r 6 ! ! 261 Y; b ° ~ ~ 9 HHiI3~ ~ Wffi ~3ee ~~~ills~lilll _~` e3A~~~ ~a~ ~ Be®OOOOOOO®® 1 s8 6R ~.-, 6 W F L.. O G. V oaZ_ C V z J ~; n ! ~~ ~' Q§ gg~~ b!e 1 1~1 y~ e y!~ c~3 wro-ro+(eac) ar~xon mos xran®rv 6 § coa s~na toner swjswm am. t~do~¢naa raa~a vewio j ~ ~ 3 . B mzsr t~nu anunxu enr an®cmr it S~~IA2i3S rJNI2I3~KI~N~ SHH ao una s~naras ~aaam aor i ~ ~ 1 S j ~ n a ~ ~ ~~ 03 ~ ~ ~$ a~~gg! ~ ~ z qq A+aQg W ~ ~ ~b ~ ~ ~ti ~p eetyje pW ~ ~ e 1 e ~ t „ IY W N ~ ~ W ~~ ~~ 4y0 2' ~ e ~ C VII „i .-. a s= i~Q! ~` Eeylyl~ ~~1 r7 Y r/ (~~,^ of ~ ~~' lice ~'~iil~l~llll eaeooooooo®o 23~ .'`'. Ub~a e4s4 ~=a@ ~~t~~ s~ e n~ ~5 i iii ~~~ e ova ~6 ~+ 4~ ~/4 ~-~~> Zoo, ~ ~ 5 E 3 ~ n ~ ~ ~3 ~S ~~ y ~ ~g I~e~ 1 1 i z ~ ~~ ~~ c € ~ ~~ ~~ e~9~ ~ e ~ i 88~ $~q ~ ~ '~- p~ ~ eetr I ~ 1 1 f •~ yy~~ W Y r/fl ~ ~~ `~' ~ 6 ~ie~ ~ I ~ F I, ~ ~' f l a ~ ~~ ~~ii~illlilll ~ ae®oooooom®® 2s~ .~~ ~ ~~8: ^b9 h ~~~d @~ ~~~~~ ~~ e ~~ F9i i. y .6ple A ,°~ !~ ~~ a I~ I a~~ ~~ ~/5 wn-~vrfewl x~ryaon mw xr~u~ p ~ lN~fdP0e3° YIfU81d 7110 ' ~ S~~IA2I~S `JNI2I3~NI`JN~ SHH ~°'eoy'"t1xn sa8d1''ia~m~us 3°~vaP"m"so 9 ~ ~ I t I ; ~ ~ a z ~ ~ Qp~pQ~ ~~ ~ F ep~p ~. W ~ S~ u~ ~ ~ u ~3 ~n c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ wYr/ ~~°°;°;~ a W~ n ~yl!q ~ e ai k~~8 ' s ~ , 9 Kc:e i i 0 ~~ 4m ;9E Ei° exl ~~~° ~i r'i~i °lil °~91i~liil'I ooo~~~~~~~a~ ~ B~ a31 E ~~ ¢ ' u r~ u ,~_ ..._. C~~ L~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ o -~ rw ~ ~ ... .~, . . .~ R R R 1 ~ ` 1 R j - R I a • ~ u ~ y ~ = O ~ ^ G G ^ ~ i ~ ® , 9 ^ I 1 R R R ~ _STpEEf R - ^TRFET STREET STREET B ^ ' STREEiR - ' ' STREET '~~ ~T~i • T• • i • pi i~~i A • ~ P • • - ~ ^ •A• • • Y ~^ STREEi •p• • • • ~ ^ STREET ^. Y • • 444 111 777 `~=-^ STREET 1~-'^'STREET .^. I •p• Y Y STREET --^ 'A' • ~ - - STREET • • •ST~ ~ ^ II 'A' • I•• T n~T ^ .p. o ~I 'A' s ~R II R R E~ ~ R R ^ ~ ~ R R R~ • i • • Y • • i • • i ~ ~ Y • i [ 2 pq pp GI ~ G vq R ® ~ ~ G ~ q p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ]a ~ ~ i gk n 7 ~ E ~ 6 ,'w°BC,~u"n~pve CROP ~L10N5 HBS ENGINEERING SERVICE ' ~ 1 ~ 55 ~ °RNER. P®1G OSVPIAPI°M/ ~aaa caYStaz pIpNR6, Rum em ~ AIdRIf~N cmn uar. rprx (° '°~ I • • r ~ aMa-roHaKJ 9015INOA 8109 NYJ17101t ~ p ~ ~ ~s~ ~ ~~ 1N91fdtll&I90 Ytl®Id 1dY10 ~ ! ~ 6y S~~IA$~S `J[~II2I~~NIJN~ SHH sNOU~9s ssoa~ ~9.+r~amr~,x~ 333! ~ ~ I ~ ~ $ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ .. ! r .T. 1 1 ~~ 3nr .-•- 3nr r utvennar Q~~, r ! ~ ~ ~ i^ ~ 5 '--- ! IQ 9 _ ~, ! r i e N O k 9 ~ e r 1 P E ~ - e 0 ! P ~ J ~ 5 ~ I ! ! v 3Atl ___ nrwmvi r N 3nr y 5 rm1m~ ~ - !r +-~ .. p~. H 1y ~ ~~ ! ~ ~ fie! C~~ a i l_ i ~ f ~~ F °z i F; ~ ~ ~~ ~a Ht aq~ ~. ^•RYRY n II le~~• •t" 5 s t s ~ v 'fie"°~ rn ~'~~~~i ~ o o ~~ pE~ end aT ~1 ~~~ 5 t 5 t ~8: ~~ ~'. op °0000 i ~ ~a ~ ~, i~ i if i ~, ' I uotn ,I ~ i~ ~~ I ~ i~ ,I i, i~ i 5! t ~i~~ 1 i ~d q ~a rr m N 'aoi ~ 1 V y~U p O Q ^I z~~ 1~3 w~~ ~[ 9 ~=~~ v a' F a Zzm F ~ .fir ~~~ Y Y 1 ~i c _ _ .....o,w.w.... ~ ate,,,,,,, i~ CI'IO~ NVJITI3Nid f Hro ws ~~g - ---------- °--- -anv G~wM'~av - E' ! ,A i - ~ r ~ ea r v, 4 Q } Q ~ i D ~ 1 ~ t _ ~ ! ~ a i ~ ~ ,.. _ a _ `~ t ~ o ~ ~~ a 3 ~_;~ ' , 00~ i ~ ~ ` 3 .,,~ ~ ; i g f i 1, ._ ~ I s ] ~ D ~. T ] ~ o ~ `• {~ i C ~ •..~ ;:~ i ~ .:~: ~~Q ~1 ;` ~ a _;;: - ; Q ` + d ~ { .~ ! __~__ _~ ~- i ~ -- ~Iw ~ 1 .i~ ~ ~ ~ .j ~ ~` .; ~~ ~ 9 ~ t, i ~ 1 i ~F 1 i~~ll? 11 t: ! Ij~~ ~ ~ t I ~~ ,~ ~: ;~ = ,~ 4:d 1 ~ 3 :i ~ K ~~~ g ~ ~ ~ i 3~+{~ a ``4 ~ ~ a]j]/~ ~lliil ~ - __I li~ ~ ~~i Y t _. ~Z ~~ 1 } - ~ ~ i' .w-k 2- • ~ 7 ~~XX1,Q/1' °~~~ ~ _ r"O `~~,'~ Q-LO~ NVJITI3NI~j~ ~I~n a~ h Mss a W 1 I p 0. i p d I C a C ~ ~ 2 h ' `a ( f F it 7 i f ;,,1;(~ j ~{ 9 ~ ~a'3 d f( 2~ L~r Niy F~A~ Z ~ ~ Ri1 A .~ _ 'Y~ v Z ~ ~S~ C (~1 !! ~ ) ~1 0 3f \ j M •~• N i d - r a ~ ~ III I i ~~ ] v ~~"~ 1 >. ~ I3 ~ ~ I I~~ i~ t ' Ij ~ ~ - ~ i ~~ ~~5 ~ ~1~ --- , , 5~~ I 3 ,, L .. 9 i~ (i ~ ~~ ~~ ~ --~~. r..wc~~r -' Z -- -~- h~ .~-- ~j(N-~R' `' F ~~ ~IIIlillll J '..,.,'.~,.. a~oiJ°°riv~iiiavty~ 4 ~~ •aiV m.cp, av ~ ^ p ~ [rz• ~~ +l F ! i ~I t~ [ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ' ~ 3 u ~;7 ~ , F 1• '~~~{{{ j ® ~~ "'.~~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~~~ ~~~~ #~,~p~ .~~ t ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ '° ~ ~~ea~ ~!~g#;°'s ~~ ~ ~~1€x i3l~ ~`~~ 4#~ ~ t ~ ~~ ~ f~~ ~~~ ~ ~S ~ ~~~ v , ';~~, ~1 ~~ ti, ~~ ~s _ ~, r .;,, ~~ ~ ~ ,_ ~.~,~. ~,,.r ;~..~-. ® l f. ~~-! b ~. > ~ i ®_ ~ ~i ~~ ___ ~ ~ - ~ .~ ,: ~~ ~s~ ~ 3/.V NV WS n~H ~ z h _ azo~°Hd~~~~~~ <_n~ ..~ F IwV d1 ~~ ~'~~~ r: 5 1~ ~1 ~ h u Q W p0 od0. 4 ,0 4 .I ~~3 E• li=p, ~ ~f ~~_ i 5 t f 9 T ~~. +J'{ jG"Jr '~ 'env r•r ws ~~ ~ 1 -~ Z 1 ~a A ~. ~i t~~E e~51 S1T ~~~n I`1 azo'rJ°°HV~i~ia~y i ~ 3~ t F _ Qi , o•: p ''' ~~ 1 ~~r °:j - ~ i y ~ ! ~ ~ ~ - , e r ~ ~' $: 3 nn z~ ~, .... s ~~ ~,rv~s~r ~ s" $~ J 4 h a LL D~ N 20 s~ I l Q'f0~ FIV~I2I311b' $, ,, ' I h t f i'' '• iN.. '! i p~N2~ i ~ ~ \ r • ~~ _µ }s .~ -r _~ o =~ e 0 ~ ~ F I~2 -~_ .A I l azo'rJ°°niv~iiiarayJ t Y 1Q 7 A i i - _ .~ .~, ~~ ~~ ~ i .i , f N~ ~.. \ -~ . - _. .., i ~ 4~~ ~ _- I _ J , ' , ~t~ ~ i ~~ ~i i I ' £~_ ~ k ,~~ ~~ a~ ~ _ ~ ~ i a a .o,~s ,I ~ ~~ ~ L.2. .- ~~ i~ I j 1~~ a M '. i 1 ~1 / r Y d z 4 r w N W 3 f I S ~~3 n 7j ~ Q'IO~ AIVJIHHNItr'~ Ii t ~ ~ 1~~ I ., ~; o~F Y~ a 4 n z W p~N z3 wGW,9~ I~ I i ~~~ . },ZH3Q r ~. t i ~£ p r 0 z S r,~'' _~3tE~~~ ,~ ~AME$ICAN GOLD ..~~.. -.. _ - i 2. z ~- _ - J _ ~a,,, azo'rJ°°riv~iiiayty~ " - ,,,,,,,,,,,,~ ~ ~~,~, i i ~~ 1 ' x a - - z n , _~ ~ ~ ~ y F .. ~ a , .., a. x . • ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ . ,E ~ . ,~ ~ .- - .~ ..: . ~ ~ - ~~ ~. , 25 I~ I~~ DAN s illllllllJ C`1 azo'rJ°°riv~iiiav~y~ i ~ 1 0 1 . oe.n w.~. „o ~~# I M • y ~ ~~~ i ~C ~ ~ {, (y ~3 a ~{ d ~A i R~ pp \~yy i R .I° iy Y i .~~ • • I~~ C"1 azo'rJ°°rivbiiiac~y~ tj 1 ' _ ~`~ I"~ { ~ ~-z ..w.a~ ua..e.... { Q70~ NVJIli3 NiF7~ ~ ~ ~ + 1~ Y -. • I /.r t ~ q~. S ~~ I = i ~ .~ i I ., i ~ •, , i~ 3, f \ ~' ~d1 hh i _ L •~ _. ~~ ... d P _ p ~ H z~ I~q ~7 ~ ....,, y..p~. ~-1 _ azo'rJ°°HV~ixar~yAi i ,~,~~~ m o~ o PV 6 a. rfi =k ~ e t ~ _~ ~ {{{ {{ i ' 4 ~ 3 e V A i• ' • 6 4 ~ g4 i b t D V rl p J ~7 ' i i i~ ! ;~--,~~ `~ . 9 Y 4 y u ~Y • u I~ ~ ~/~ 1 azo`cJ°°riv~iiia~yJ !j~ 'iN~+, ii .~ y d S i ~1 ~r d a .~ 3 I~Z i C 11 y ~~ I J @i i C a Q ~~= ^ ^ ~3 I a s ~b iu ; ~~s ~z 7, ~+ i& t I~3 i i ~ I ( I .I f Y 'I 11 ,', ,/~ ? ~ ' i.7" ( a~o'rJ°°niv~iiia~[yJI ,,...o,~...,.e. ~ ~ ~ ' ~`~ _~ m a a w J lil S ~~~ Uzn~.~ f (('~j 1 ~ i.T l azo_rJ'°NVOiiiaHCy~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~d' ~ s • -- - ~•L•w_. _. J d ~r= i. 1, "~ ._ ~ ~ 'U 0 A i ~ ~~ r ., ~` I. t~ 8 ~C ~ + ,~ i ~ ~~ r .. A • ~ ' ' ' i ~ ~ ~ ~, , ~' , r , ~F~~.l ~~ ~ ,~ . ~ ~ ~ ~_ Y d r ~e ~ y I/,5 ~...~~.~ r,!-~ .onw / .4 a-zoo H:.~iii3~d ~, ~ .' . ', ,~ ~,, 1 p ~ 4 ~ Ln ~__~ `` i `~ i f~~ , • ' 00 Y ~• .._ ~. .~ '>S :~ 3 _~ J ~~ i v ~~~ J ZC G~ ~` .~ i i ~ j ~ ~ ~ , J a U a i `~ ~ : _R ~ ~6 ~~ 1 ~ ~ F R 1 p ~ 35 r/16 -~ aio`rJ'°rivoiiiaNty~ . ,off f 1 ~"Y Y 0 F u gib [~ tj ~ N 3l~ t I/i~ ~. ~~ r= / r 1 azo~rJ°°rivoiiiany~ I ~ ~ i __J ~ x 0 3 A :~ ~F q 3i 3 Y 0 F ~ . FL a u 1~8 .,.e.... a~oyrJ° °HV~iiiar~yJl ijf ;~~ s ~ ~ . 0 ~ ,~ ~k P~j_ ~S [ s ~ f~ ~~ .k M j 4 ~~ ti `~! V~ `. J `'° or y b Q ~'•u npy O ~ ~ ~ ~g R ~ ~s - j, ~~~ vC . ~ '.`- I~ V o`• N \ ~E 1 ~~ 1 e u • r L-7 azo"rJ°°riv~iiiawyJ I -~ ~ ~~,1~~N- ~ -4~ rz ~ ~ ~ Yl F F ~ J ~ ~: J~ 7 - r Y A i ' V~+I-L i 4 G \ ~ ` ~ d n t~ ~ ~', it ~ ~~.. ii ., ~~_. t A ~ 1 v ~` '` 1 k rr ~~ b~N ~q ~~ ' Il2o E L~ QIOtJ~NdJI~I3NItJ~ E js's iiN~ s~ u .. ~ ~ - ~ i ~ 7 , \ i ~ ~ 3 f w '~ j_- z N •p ~. H 40 ~. . _ . .. ~a o~\ z o ~ ~ " u ~° F n u 3 1~ E I S/~z I II~~ ~~~ IJ' 1 Q'IO~ NdJ1113S11b'~ -€ i ~s ~ fa ~ j~ F 1 p•Q r ~yl ` ~ Z ~ t5~t5 e=eaa c } ? ~ Fzlf 'J F; a O~ i f i ' 4 ~\ ~. ~ - ~ ~ \ ~ _ ~~ J Q S ¢ ; ~~ ~ ~ Y J p' ` \ ~ •' S `~ ~ ~1 ~~,N yl t ~! 7.^,_ 77 i ' ~~ fp 1122 ~ - ~S'-7 azo'rJ°°rivoiiiawyJ ~ ~ ~ ~N , ~i • 1_lu M c ~~~ ~~ ~° ~_ ~ 1 Z ~~ ~• •~ ~ ~ -1/~~ , • \ I // .\I1 ~ / f . q ~`y/ \ - a~~ U I 1~E N y z ~,~ ~. ' ~ r/z3 I I I ,~ i s I ~~ ~~ a-to"rJ°°rivoiaar~y~ i ~ •~ ~ ~i ~'~ •{ ; ~w ,• ~€ ~I F A ~~ I~ 43 ~~ ,~i~F~~~ N_ 0 3 ~~ ~d 1~z ¢ sZ~I ~ }~h N 3a - ~~~ - - - - - - ~ 8 ~ N P ~ ~ ~ D y ~r c4~~ ~ ~ 4 ~``. E } .' t ~~ a~ n~ f' o ~ ~ s r~~ € 1 ~ ^~ ' A ~,~ - - - i.,. _ -1 IL P 3t 0 c <~ .,-_,.JY aj ggE t, if ~~ ~ ~~ P PIEDRA ~.M ~AMERICANoG OLD T l/ azo~rJ° ,~ i Hv~iiiai^ty~ ~ ~ i ~ j ~~ _ Z ~~, Y c . ~ i~ ~~~ f •l ~ ~~ ~ - r' .,»„ D~ N 45 i 9 =8 m ~^!~, i ~ I a~ 3 f ,g ~ ~ Z6 i azo'rJ° °riv~iiiaNty~ ~o ~ - ~A x ~ ~ - - - __ - - ~ 9 'MK _ _ &)'1 of 7 I~ ~~ a^A I y 1 ~~ ~ i ~~ C I 6N €~ I d ~ e i ~ ~. i ~ ~ ,. ~+--- ~~. ~~~~, ~° ~~N~n a a _ ,, ~ ~. .~ ~., . I~ ~~ '1 t ~~ PF °~ _ B ~ ~~~ ° 1 i -- - , - - - - - __ - ~ I ' W I • .: K Rx 1 .f ~ Z z~ ~~ ~ 1 1 0 `I,i;'vi ~ ~ ~ ^,n r 0 R a ~~j`1 azo'rJ°°riv~igai~yJ 8: is ~?f ~.# e ^e C~ v Y R Sa 3 1 r ~._~ I I ~ ~ I ~~ I ~~ 28 azo'rJ°°riv~iaar~y ~. i~~,,~~~ ~_J l~I 7 J ~.. i , . , ,~ ~ azo~ HJ~iiia~y~ ~j j ' ''~- .~,,~ :~ ~r ~n ~~' ~ ~` ,~ . ~. i t p~~ a 9I ~S _~. ,~ .~ T~3o i $ , - II7 ~~~~. II < ~~. { ,fix ~.: ,~.j 1 i i 4 i p r U' + g~S i ~~ 'I ,i ~ ~ ~ H 50 Se,'3'~~ aio°rJ°°HVOiiiar+ty~ ~ + i M v e a ~/°// ° ° ~u~ 1 5: M C ~(~ °, ° ,.~.,., .W,z 9: ~ Y~§w 3 ~ F ~A ° f yr y ~ T ^ n ~ j~ .__ 0 ~- ,a,..~ r d M~ 7 ~_ ~ i ° ~y ~_~ , E , I~3~ II=I -J ~-~° azo'~J° °rivoiiiaYay~ t N f ~£ H51 0 o ~i u a rdQ ~v 'i i ~I C i ~ ~~ __~- . J ~r _ ti ,, C '~ - f ~~~~~~ .~ Y b yQ - tl . ~~ ~) Y _ ~ N T~3Z ~. 1 Q10~ DIdJI2i3 i1i~ •i +d ,a f •_ ~ g~R Y ~ ~ Z O F ~.A~ °a d~ -i ~~ i i j ~ ~ I € ,~ I f~ '. e Y ,~ ~~ ~~ii i! ~~ ~i _.l__.~ ~1'. , t- !~ ~ ` - -w..z .~', t \, - ~ ~ ._ - ~ - - -- a - ~ •~ - ~ ~ ~- - ' ~~ N 5~ R~x~ ~ ~~33 ~ i ~ ~- ~ 1 i Z{ ~~ Q'IO~ NVJIZI3 Yib'~ iiS Ra oa m. ~~ ro • ~'~~~ 1 ~~ a- g' LL Q Z O u •_ ~a r E ~j;~il~l 1\1.1~\~ . d 9 ~y ~~ ~2 r a~ ~~ ~~- :. .~ :_. , ~ o- 3. - o D~H ,~„ ~134~ i Zj~l azo'~J°°ri~~iiiai~ty~ I f '~ J Y Z~ O F pn ~v • r ~J b~ µ 135 Z` ~ a~o`rJ°°HV~iiiaieyJ F (! ~5.~~ sip J:~~ Y v a m J W ~~ N 55 >~ Y z~3~ '!IIIIIIIII ~.~, °..,<d. a~to"rJ° °HV~iiia~yJ .~I-7 Bii jii~~f~f ~,~ d,i ,~~ 1,, f \\ O ~ ~ ~~ Q ~~ 0 O e i ,~ -y 'po ~ ~ ®~ i _~ / _ 1([ I' I E 0 ~ ~ ~. !~ •B ~ ~ . t x ® ~ ~ ` i D' ~ ~ - ~~ a W ~ d ~~ 4y1 Oo ZQ ~~ o a= di Ri r 8.t ~ ~~ ! '` ~ -~/3] i ~ 4 8ify W• 1 LL ! ' , ~'I7 ~ ~ , ,,. ~ azo°rJ°°HV~iiiar~yJ ~ i 3 ;f 66ii ~~s r1 LJ ~p~.N51 yu Q ax~Ql u xl~ 4 ~'I7 a,o~ Hw~~~~~d ~ ; . ~ ,~E ~~= 8 A a n X d 0 F u ~' 3 • b£~58 ~~39 ,.e, w..a..~. - fT_? azo°r.~°°tiv~iiiavtyJ t I~i if~~ ~~. ~1 ~~ Z/I i i ~ /' ` ~ QYO~ NVOIH3 NItJ ~~%1 1 K r s e ~- ~~~ Y F d~ g: w a' ~~ •~ IS`r s r .~ ~• d; i 1~;~:+~ ~~ X11 ..o• p~. H c,o • ~' ~~91 ~,~ ~_ c w 2 ti C I'{ ~~ azo'rJ°°HVOiiiavzyJ ~`~~~`N~ t' ! t~_ v I 9111111111 T~ ~7 a-co7J° °riv~iiiai~yJ ~ ~ . ~ ryl i L 1-a v' ? • • • I~43 aio'rJ°°niv~iiiar~y~ '~ SI 7 ~~~~~~°~ I I~~ iii' ~~ b~~cc3 ~~ 8 Y ~N x/4-4 • ~/4S a-corJ°°HVOiiiai°ty~ ~ ~ i ~ i F v`I ~ • O 2 m 1 a~ • ',~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ S ' ~ i9 9 ~ t e. i I ; r r~ ~J ~ I c ' ec J N ~ I~ 8 - ~ c z m ¢>,~ a ~ ~ ~ - 5 .I. ~ ~ ip ~,_,,r - ~--_-_---~ ---- - ~ ;1 st ,, - .~ ~ . _ - ~- ~ I , , ~. - ----,-- --- .T 1 T _ _ _ _ ..- : . i ~ -75..."'x .~ I I -J I ~ ~ I 's ', ' I I I ----- ~ ~ I I I I I ~ ~` I I I I A-. , .- ; I I I I I I , ~ . ~ a ; .r- 44x - `, ~s~~~ W i Y , . V i ®~~ i O i® 1 i I i ~ 1 I O _ I ~ ~ I , t Ai. ~ ~. Z ~ ' O ~ ~ 2~ i ' ' I O OFi m ® i ~ ~ 6 i O •y I ' ~ j 4 Y+ ~y O - ~ v s '' , ~ . ~ ' a ~ ~ ~ : S ~ ~ ~ ~ - 7 ' ~ - i ~ r 1 - -'Y n% I .r, ix lex iw. .r '^ ~ ~I L 1 ~v ~ ~ Br - __ L1jNY9Cy~ _ 1 i - T _ ~ W V ~ ~ _ _ I ~ i _~{~ ~ OO.: '~ .J n6I v~ ~ rsa { -kR ~~ 5 _ ~ 11 ~a {-- Pe 1 x0 I • u - i ~ 3 _ C - I Sri e •"f /l l b ~ O I _ c _ r. p - ~ J I I I ~ 'f4~ ~.~.{ Ax ~ LIX LR r y •~ - w -cl--i - ~ yyvo arWV~ ~ +' ` '6>/ 81Y 1256 Izy {, , ~ v x~ ,. ,, ... DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 00 p m Alan Warren December 18, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16262 - PIEDRA ARCHITECTURE AND DEVELOPMENT CO - A request to subdivide 9 23 acres of land into 15 single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road -APN 1061-561-02 Related file DRC2001-00584 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00584 - PIEDRA ARCHITECTURE AND DEVELOPMENT CO -The design review of house elevations and detailed site plans for 15 lots on 9 23 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1.2 dwelling units per acre) located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road-APN 1061-561-02 Related file SUBTT16262 Background The proposed tract has been designed with the new Very Low Residential standards to accommodate improved horse keeping potential Each lot is at least 200 feet deep with at least 60-foot rear yard setback for the main house The house models are very unique with a not so subtle "50's modern" look with which staff is very intrigued All the models have a different Floor Plan and Elevations and therefore the local street will seem like a custom subdivision with individual homes on each lot Many of the homes are true split-levels with second floor areas exiting on to upper ground levels Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee • discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project Grading -Staff believes this project, in many respects, exemplifies the intent of the hillside grading standards with varying rooflines and balconies, which result in multiple levels As a result, most of staffs comments address speafic site issues rather than architecture comments The site slopes gently to the south The plan proposes a terraced approach on each lot with graded slopes dmding the lots with distinctwe lower and upper portions The drnding slopes are designed to exhibit natural slope features while creating significant grade differences for the split-level home plans The street alignment is like the neighborhood to the north that has a street connecting Klusman and Archibald Avenues Staff will present the Grading Committee recommendations at the Design Review Committee meeting Because the tratl easements are totally on the lots of this tract, staff recommends that the perimeter block wall (with 10-foot wide gates) be located along the inside of the trail easement and a trail fence be provided along the outside trail easemenUproperty line The tract is scheduled for Trails Advisory Committee review on December 12, 2001, which will be considering the trail fenang features (PVC rail, peeler post) Staff will present its recommendations at the Design Review Committee meeting Materials and Colors -The materials have not been submitted at the time of report writing Staff review and recommendations regarding the materials and colors will be presented at the Design Review Committee meeting Architecture -Staff believes the unique architecture will provide an interesting feature to this area and is in keeping with the modern style of the Tolstoy residence to the west Staff does not propose any changes to the models ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~Xy~~3iT ..K it • DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16262 & DRC2001-00584 - PIEDRA ARCHITECTURE & DEV CO December 18, 2001 Page 2 Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Along the Equestrian trail perimeter, landscaping shall be predominately Eucalyptus varieties to emulate the area's windbreaks The applicant shall make an effort to save existing trees on Lots 4 and 12 as house location and lot grading may allow for Staff determination as to those that may be appropriate to save will be made through the Tree Removal Permit process 3 The applicant has provided typical cross-sections for eaves, recessed walls, etc The Committee may wish to comment on the level of detail in the execution of significant features Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission Policy and or Development Code requirements and should be incorporated in the protect design without discussion 1 Taper three or four car driveways down to standard two-car with at street 2 Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing terrain, and present a more natural appearance 3 Slope planting should be provided to soften appearance of slopes and prevent sod erosion 4 Minimize slopes between lots to preserve privacy Where slopes cannot be minized, mitigate concerns through other means -landscaping, fenang, etc 5 Coordinate exterior budding design on all elevations from bwlding to budding to achieve the same level of design quality 6 Avoid identical color schemes plotted on adjacent lots 7 Use native rock for fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products 8 Design chimneystacks with accent materials used on house, such as back or stone, except interior chimneys 9 Provide decorative perimeter fenang (i e , masonry) at tract edges and along streets 'Decorative" means stucco finish, split face block or similar textured surface Smooth preasion block is not acceptable 10 Vary wall setbacks adjacent to mator thoroughfares to increase visual interest 11 Retaining walls exposed to public view to be decorative masonry 12 Slope fenang along side property Imes may be wrought iron or black plastic-coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views ~ ~ ~ ~~ K /Z DRC COMMENTS • SUBTT16262 & DRC2001-00584 - PIEDRA ARCHITECTURE & DEV CO December 18, 2001 Page 3 13 Retum walls and corner sidewalls to be decorative masonry and compatible with the architectural style If more than one style of house design exists, then a simple wall design is preferred Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Revew Committee recommend the protect for approval Design Review Committee Action• Members Present Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Alan Warren The applicant stated that they were in agreement with all of the staff comments and recommendations for the protect The Committee recommended that the application be forwarded to the Planning Commission with the staff recommendations as conditions of approval with the following addition That the 2-rail PVC trail fenang, as recommended by the Trails Advisory Committee, be • white rn color and that sigrnng be proHded at each street tratl entryidentifying the trails as pnvate • b~ N (,,8 K/3 I. ROLL CALL: X Carlson A Clopton X Henderson X Jarek X Mitchell II. NEW BUSINESS: A TENTATIVE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2001, @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION AGENDA X Stewart X Tolstoy Dickey (Alternate) Mannenno (Alternate) X Zupke (Alternate) ~t P ~, --- --- viwwvivwcrr-rIC1../RIi DEVELOPMENT CO - A request to subdivide 9 23 acres of land into 15single-family lots and the design review of house elevations and detailed Site Plans in the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre) located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road APN 1061-561-02 Related Fde DRC2001-00584 Action: The Committee reviewed proposed the trails plan. The location of the 15- foot private easements along the rear of each lot (extending between Archibald and Klusman Avenues) and the improvement of the Community Trail along Archibald Avenue were recommended for approval. In addition, the following recommendations were included: The trails easements should be widened to 20 feet at the entry points off Archibald and Klusman Avenues (Lots 1, 8, 9, and 15) in order to accommodate vehicle gate with side access per Feeder Trail Transition City Standard Plan 1006-B. Further, a recommendation should be made to the Engineering Division requesting curb cuts from the public streets at the intersection of the CommunityTrail and the feeder trail transitions to allow for supply vehicles access to the private trail easements. Said standard improvements shall be implemented prior to occupancy. In addition, signs should be provided at the private trail entries notifying the public trail use prohibitions (i.e., motorcycles, ATV, etc.). ~C H l~q tXN/~s it NL ACTION TRAILS AGENDA December 12, 2001 Page 2 2. The private trail fencing should be provided along the outside easement line with continuous 2-rail PVC trail fencing similar to that required along the Community Trails. Perimeter tract walls should be located inside the easement line on each lot with a 10-foot wide lockable gate. 3. Also, the Committee commented that the Archibald Community Trail crossing at the new street should be provided with a rough finish (non- slippery) for the safety of horses and riders. B TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16237 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION - A residential subdivision of 8single-family lots on 4 56 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Haven Avenue APN 201-182-30 Action: The Trails Committee conceptually approved Tract 16237 with the following conditions: 1. Applicant will provide necessary width for maneuvering (turnaround or equal) on the east property line on Lot 4. 2. The standard decorative block wall and fencing will be reversed to allow a • standard 2-rail PVC fencing on the outside property line. The decorative block wall on the inside easement line shall include a lockable 10-foot wide gate. 3. Standard gates and trail easements should be widened to 20 feet at the entry points to accommodate vehicle gate with step-through access per Feeder Trail Transition City Standard Plan 1006-B. In addition, curb cuts will be required on Wilson Avenue at the local trail connections to permit house trailer and equestrian service vehicles. C TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16253 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION - A residential subdivision of 10 single family lots on 7 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1-2 dwelling units per acre), generally located at the northwest cornerof Victona Street and Etiwanda -APN 227-041-18 and19 Action: The Trails Committee conceptually approved Tract 16253 with the following conditions: Two trail connections and appropriate off-site improvements will be provided on the north side of the tract to connect the local trail to the Community Trails. 2. The standard decorative block wall and 10-foot wide lockable gate will be . reversed to allow the standard 2-rail rail PVC fencing on the outside property line. 3. The corral location on Lot 4 will be moved to increase the distance between house and conal. ~ £ H -.~ O ~ ~.L • ACTION TRAILS AGENDA December 12, 2001 Page 3 4. Standard gates and trail easements should be widened to 20 feet atthe entry points to accommodate vehicle gate with step-through access per Feeder Trail Transition City Standard Plan 1006-B. 5. The local trail on the east property line will be revised to extend to allow access to Lot 4 and 5 equally. 6. The entire length of the local trail on the west property line will include a public easement fortrail access connections to the existing communitytrail in order to provide future access from the undeveloped property to the south and west. D TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ANNUAL BUDGET REVIEW-DiscussionoftheAlta Loma Riding Club's (ALRC) letter regarding submitted trail improvement protects pnonty list Action: Item was continued to the January 9, 2002, meeting to allow for more time for discussion. r~ LJ III. ADJOURNMENT MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:54 PM i ,I I ,, '~ :~ ~~ H ~~ ~/s City of Rancho Cucamonga Plamm~p Oms~on (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FOR (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of~this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided'in~full. ~' , -, ~ , , ., :. „ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the responslbdity of the applicant to ensure that the appl~catlon Is complete at the bins of submittal, CIty stall wUl not be available to peAorm work required to provide missing Information Application Number for the protect to which this loan pertains Protect ARCHIBALD ESTATES Title Name&Addressofprofect AMERICAN COLD MORmGA ORP owner(s) 9-39 ~ 19~'F~ ST3~~~~' Name & Address of developer or protect sponsor PIEDRA ARCHITECTURAL & DEV. CO. SAN DIMAS CA 9177 Contact Person 8 Address WILLIAM P. DE CASAS ~£ H ~'1. ~N~P3 ~T "M" • I \PLANNING\FINAUFORMS\COUNTER\IN~TSTn1 wan ~mn .,___ • Name 8 Address of person prepanng this (orm (d different from above) WILLIAM P. DE CASAS 562,818.8712 *(Cell) 909.394,3552 (Office/Fax) Telephone Number '1) Provide a lull scale (B-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and md~cate the site boundanes 7 ON ARCHIBALD AVE, APPROXIMATELY FEET NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF HILLSIDE ROAD, 3) Protect Location (descnbe) 2) Prowde a set of color photographs which show ropn:sentahve views into the site /rom the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site /rom the pnmary access points which serve the site, and rep2sentatrve wows of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVE. THROUGH TO KLUSMAN AVE. • 4) Assessor=s Parcel Numbers (attach addrt~onal sheet if necessary) APN 1061-561-02 'S)GrossSrteArea(ac/sgff) 9.23 Acres ~6) Net Srte Area (total ste srze minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) • 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the protect site (attach additional sheet ~f necessary b£H73 M/z I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERUNITCT01 Wan vnn In/ormabon md~cated by astensk (') is not mquued of nonconstruct~on CUP=s unless otherwise requested by staff • 8)lnclude a descnphon o/all permits which wdl 6e necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully implement the pro/ecf TRACT ENGINEERING?SOILS, GRADING, STREET LIGHTS, FIRE HYDRANT, SEWER, WATER, DRAIN LINES, STANDARD RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS. 9JDescnbe the physical sethng o/the site as rt exists before the protect rnclud~ng rnformat~on on topography, soil stabddy, plants and animals, mature trees, tracts and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any exrsbng structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of [he structures Attach photographs of significant /eatures described In addihon, site all sources of rnformat~on (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, brot~c and an:heologrcal surveys, treffic studies) THE EXISTING SITE CONSISTS OF 9.23 ACRES OF VACANT LAND WITH NATIVE GRASSES/BORDERED BY BLUE GUM EUCALYPTUS ON BOTH NORTH & SOUTH PROPERTY LINESWITH AN ADDITIONAL ROW OF EUCALYPTUS APPROX. AT THE CENTER LINE RUNING NORTH & SOUTH. AT THIS WINDROW THERE IS AN EXISTING CONCRETE IRRIGATION LINE. THERE ARE NO TRAILS OR ROADS ON SAID SITE WITH NO VISIBLE SIGNS OF WILDLIFE AS SITE HAS RECENTLY BEEN CLEANED AS PER WEED ABATEMENT PROCEDURES. THERE ARE NO SCENIC ASPECTS OR STRUCTURES ONSITE. THE EXISTING SLOPE CONDITION RUNS SOUTH AT APPROXIMATELY 108 AND SOIL CONDITIONS ARE STABLE. ABOVE SOIL & GRADE CONDITIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM ENGINEERING BY HBS ENGINEERING AS FILED ON PROPOSED TRACT MAP APPLICATION. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Srte all sources of rnformabon (books, published reports and oral history) THERE ARE NO KNOWN CULTURAL OR HISTORICAL ASPECTS ON THIS VACANT SITE. • ~ ~ N ~~F M/3 I \PLANNING\FINAUFORMS1COlINTFav Nircm, anion vnn • 11)Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the safe (aucraR, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses _ _ , ~`_ VACANT SIDE FRONTS ON ARCHIBLAD AVE. AND RECEIVES NORMAL VEHICLE NOISE LEVELS AND IS BORDERED TO THE NORTH BY A RESIDENTIAL TRACT OF SIMILAR ZONING/SPARCE RESIDENCES TO THE WEST AND TO THE SOUTH, 12)Descnbe the pmposedpro/ect m detail This should provide an adequate descnpGon of the sde ~n terms o/ultimate use which will result Irom the proposed pro/ect Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent o/ development to occur with each phase, and the ant~apated completion of each increment Attach add~6ona1 sheet(s) it necessary p,E PROPOSE TO DEVELOP THE PROPOSED 15 UNIT TRACT IN TO r - THREE PHASES OF 5 UNITS EACH AT A CALENDAR OF SIX MONTHS EACH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS A SUPER CUSTOM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH EACH LOT OF 15 PROPOSED IS DESIGNED ARCHITECTURALLY INDIVIDUALLY WITH EMPHASIS ON UNIFORMITY IN MATERIAL APPLICATION AND ARCHITECTURAL HERTTAG TO TH AREA 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, including mlormahon on plants and animals and any cultural, h~stoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type olland use (res~denbal, commero~al, etc ), intensity o/land use (one-/amply, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale ofdevelopment (height, (rootage, setback, ear yard, etc ) THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH IS TRACT #9521 CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY OF 1/2 ACRE SITES WITH SEMI CUSTOM HOMES. TO THE WEST IS UNIMPROVED KLUSMAN AVE. WITH SPARCE RESIDENCES. TO THE SOUTH IS AN OLD RANCH HOUSE AND VACANT LAND. EAST IS ARCHIBALD AVENUE WITH A GATED COMMUNITY. 14)Will the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area o/ the pro~ect~ • NO THIS PROJECT IS IN CONFORMANCE OF THE EXISTING USES AND WOULD NOT REQUIRE ANY VARIANCES. 'pF N~5 M/~ I \D~ ~I~I All ~Ir1 CIAI ~I \C11DA~C\/~lll IAITCD~I~IITCT.I/ 1. TIC n/nn _ • 15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What mefhods o/sound proofing are proposed THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD GENERATE NORMAL TO MODERATE NOISE LEVELS CONSISTANCE IN A LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH SOLID BLOCK WALL PERIMETER FENCING ON ADJOINING DEVELOPMENTS ON THE SOUTH & NORTH. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/orrnplacements o/mature or scenic trees THERE WILL BE A PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION FILED BY A CERTIFIED ARRORTST RF('DMMFNTITN(' RF.It711VAL (1E DE11D ^D DISEASED NATIVE EUCALYPTUS TREES. 17) Indicate any bodes o/water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams THERE IS AN EXISTING IRRIGATION LINE RUNNING NORTH TO SOUTH AT APPROXIMATELY THE CENTER OF THE PROPERTY ALONG EXISTING EUCALYPTUS WINDROW. 18)Indicateexpectedamounto/water usage (SeeAttachmentA/orusageeshmates) For/urtherclanficahon,pleasecontact the Cucamonga County WaterDistnct at 987-2591 a Resident~al(gal/day) 600 aal/day Peak use(ga!/Day) 1~nn qal av b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gaUmiNac) 19)Ind~cate proposed method o/sewage disposal Septic TankX x Sewer I/septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolat~on tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewaoe npne2hgn {See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For further clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987- 2591 a Residenhal(gaUday) 270 gal/day ~C ~~ b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) --- RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number o/ rnsidenhal units Detached (indicate range o/parcel sees, mirimum lot sire and maximum lot We ro ose 1 5 size P P 1/2 acre parcels - from 20,024# to 27,646#. i ti ~ H '7(a • I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 o=tee • 1 LJ Attached (md~cate whether units are rental or for sale units) ALL PROPOSED RESIDENCES ARE SUPER CUSTOM UNITS FOR SALE ONLY, 21)Anhc~pated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sa/ePnce(s) $575,000 to $ (,75,000 Rent(permonth) S to $ 1I 1I u 22) Speaty number o/bedrooms by and type # 1 - 3 , 6 0 0 # 4 BR , 3 . 5 BA , 4 CAR GARAGE #2 - 3,850#, 4 BR, 3.5 BA 4 CAR GARAGE; #3:3,500# 4BR,3 3/4 BA,4 CAR #4: 4,200# 4RR,3.5 RA, 4 ('ARC fE5•'~~jy,~0,# SRR dnArdr•AIj~ #6:4,750# SRR,S RA,d('AR~ #7• "2330# 48&.,48A.r41.,A~r, #8:4,480 4BR, 4BA, 4CAR: #9:4,200# 4BR, 3_SAA,4 ('AR; #10:4,270# SBR, 4.SBA,4 CAR; #11:4,540# SBR+STUDY,4.SBA,4 CAR; #12:3,680# 4BR, 3.SBA,4 CAR;#13:3,570# SBR+STUDY,SBA,4CAR; 23) Indicate anticipated household sae by unrt typ#14:3,140# SBR, 4.5 BA, 4CAR; #15: 4,300# SRR,S_SRA, dr'AR 24)Indicate the expected number of school children who Hnll be resrdmg wdhrn the pro/ect Contact the appmpnate School Distnds as shown m Attachment B a Elementary 1 ,~ b Junior Hrgh 1 b c Senior Nigh COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and me~or /unct~on(s) of commeraal, mdustnal ormstdut~onal uses NOT APPLICABLE • 26) Total floor area of commeroral, rndustnal, orrnshtuhonal uses by type M~6 I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 0,,.., a ~ 27) Indicate hours o/operation • I I 28) Number of otal employees Maxi um Shift Time o axrmum Shrlt I 29)Prov~de breakdown of anbapatedlo c/ass~fications, mcludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an md~cat~on of the rate I of hire for each classification (attach a rtional sheet r1 necessary) i I 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hued that rrently reside rn the ~'ty i }31)For commeraal and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type d amount of air pollution emrssons (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Drstnct, at 18) 572-6283) i I L PRj OJECTS i2)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide ~ adequate service to the proposed pro~ecty If so, please md~cate therrresponse WATER & SEWER ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE AND DIRECTLY IN ,i FRONT OF PROPERTY ALONG. ARCHIBALD AVE. FLOOD CONTROL REPORT TO ACCOMPANY TRACT MAP ENGINERING BY H,B.S. ENGINEERING. SEE REPORT. \ ., ~~ H_~$ _ "; ~/, I ~ ANNING\FINAUFORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 c>~a ~ • In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals 33)Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB=s, rad~oachve substances, pesbcides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and othertlammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known NO. 34)W11 the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed abovev 1/ yes, provide an inventory o/all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along wdh the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cat~on plans big I hereby certity that the statements /umished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and in/ormabon roquired for adequate evaluation o/this protect to the best of my ability, that the /acts, statements, and in/ormabon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date ~ ' ~~- o ~ Signature s//LL/n!f~G~.-- Title DC v Pli> ~e /L -- D Gv aJ c'~L r~~ LJ ~p£ N ~ 9 _M~~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTE R\INITSTDI WPD 3100 o~.,e o • • HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962 5 (copy attached) to notify the City as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California (OPR) I have also been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of the date of executing this Statement, OPR has not yet compiled and distrubted a list of hazardous waste sites as regwred by said Section 65962 5. I am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development application has been submitted is not within any area specified in said Section 65962 5 as a hazardous waste site . I declare under penalty of penury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct Dated ~r ~~~ 6/ ~~/~~~~~!s~ Applicant T~ ~ -~ ~° M City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: SUBTT 16262/DRC2001-00584 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Mao 16262 - PIEDRA ARCHITECTURE AND DEVELOPMENT -The development review of proposed Tentative Tract Map No 16262, a residential subdivision of 15 single family lots, on 9.23-acres of land in the Very-Low Density Residential District (<2 dwelling urnts per acre) located at the on the west side of Archibald Avenue approximately 425 feet north of Hillside Road APN 1061-561-02 4. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00584 - PIEDRA ARCHITECTURE AND DEVELOPMENT -The design review of building elevations and precise site plotting of 15 single family homes associated with SUBTT16262 on 9 23-acres of land in the Very- Low Density Residential District (<2 dwelling units per acre) located at the on the west . side of Archibald Avenue approximately 425 feet north of Hillside Road APN 1061-561- 02 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Piedra Architectural and Development 851 Calle Serra San Dimas, CA 91773 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Density Residential (<2 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Very Low Density Residential (<2 dwelling units per acre)/Equestrian/Rural Overlay 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 9 23 acre site is undeveloped vacant land, that is annually cleaned and disked for weed control purposes. The site is framed and bisected by existing Blue Gum Eucalyptus windrows. The site slopes toward the south at approximately a 10 percent gradient The site and the surrounding area are located within the Very Low Density Residential distract Immediately north and east of the site are existing single-family neighborhoods consistent with the existing zoning. The large parcels to the south and west are each developed with one single-family residence 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division • 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~p~ H 81 ' in/io Irntial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Alan Warren, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required State Water Quality Control Board/NPDES ~ t; ~ ~ ~./r~ ~.J r-1 LJ Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 Page 3 • ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, Involving at least one Impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Slgmflcant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Plannin ~" ~ "°"'~""°""""""'11d1"" O 9 / ( ) biological Resources (/) Pubbc Services ()Population and Housing (/) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Utilities and Service Systems (/) Aesthetics (/) Water (/) Hazards (/) Noise ()Cultural Resources (/) Air Ouahty / Mandato Fndin s of Significance (/) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this Initial evaluation: (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the . environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed ~ `~' ~-6~ ./~e.~Y'-GL /~2/.F.1~ Debra Meier, Contract Senior P e December 12, 2001 u (~~N~3 ~~/1 Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact,° "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Potentally Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentally uMe ns ine~ Significant Mitgeton Sgnihrant No I an Into tad Im an Im n LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (r) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (~) policies adopted by agencies with turisdiction over the protect c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (r) vicinity d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (r) established community? Comments: a-d) The protect site is located north of Hillside Road on the west side of Archibald Avenue The area is designated Very Low Density Residential (<2 dwelling units per acre) The applicant has proposed a subdivision of approximately 9 acres into 15single-family lots (1 6 units per acre) with lot sizes ranging from 20,024 to 27,646 square feet consistent with existing subdivisions surrounding the property No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no impacts will result from the protect Potentially Sgmhcent Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentally Impan Unless Less Then Signfiwnt MM1igaoon Significant No I act Inco ratetl Im n Im n 2. POPULATION ANDHOUSN(aL Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed offiaal regional or local O O O (~) population protections b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (~) directly or indirectly (e g., through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (~) housing • r-1 U Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 Page 5 Comments: a-b) The protect consists of the subdivision of 9 23 acres of land into 15 single-family lots designated as Very Low Density Residential (<2 dwelling units per area) located north of Hillside Road on the west side of Archibald Avenue No increase m density or plan amendment is proposed Therefore, the protect will not result m a change in population protections The Cucamonga County Water Distract confirmed they have the ability to prodde adequate sewer and water service for the protect c) The protect site is currently vacant Land immediately south and west of the site is also developed with single residences on large parcels, immediately north and east of the site exist single-family neighborhoods developed m conformance with the Very Low Density Land use distract No impacts will result, as existing housing will not be displaced from the site r 1 aolant~any Sgnilwnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources aolentuny u~ss ine Signihtenl MnigaOOn Sigmfti:anl No Im q Inco teletl Im ect I n 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLF7IAS. Would the proposal result ~n or expose people to potential impacts involving. a) Fault ruptures () () () (,.) b) Seismic ground shakings () () (~) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () () () (~) d) Seiche hazards () () () (~) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (r) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (r) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (r) h) Expansive soils O O O (r) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (~) Comments: r~ LJ a-b) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 2 miles south and east of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies within 1 mile northerly. These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producng up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is approximately 9 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 10 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhenng to the Unrform Budding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. ~~ ~ ^,~ /~/y Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 Page 6 c) Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less sods are subject to ground shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface Based on ground water depths within the area (approximately 200 feet below surface grade), the potential for liquefaction within the protect area is unlikely Adhering to the City grading standards, and the Unrform Building Code, will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant. d) The site is not located near a body of water. The nearest Flood Control facilities are the Demens basin and channel located within one-mile north and west of the site, and the Alta Loma Basin and channel located within one-mile north and east of the site Given the distance and confinement of these ephemeral water bodies, development of the project site will not expose people or structures to any potential impacts The site is not within a 100-year flood plain as shown on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan; however, is adjacent to a small 100-year flood zone that encompasses the Klusman storm drain channel immediately west of the site. e) The site slopes toward the south at a 10 percent gradient, and grading will consist of moving approximately 40,000 cubic yards of material to create bwiding pads, and provide the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the protect because the site is currently vacant. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer f-h) The General Plan indicates the Hanford sod association for the site which has only slight erosion potential and runoff potential is slow to very slow. Sods are suitable for residential development. Recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soil Investigation, prepared by HBS Engineering Services, will ensure appropriate grading and compaction of the site The site contains no unique geologic or physical features Potentially $igmficanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pnamiany a °is Tne~ &pnificant Mltipanon Significant No I n Intro ateE I n Im n 4. WATER. Wdl the proposal result ~n a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (r) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (~) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (~) of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (~) water body -p£ H 8~ • M~S i Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Potenlally Sgnificant Issues and Supportng Intormatlon Sources Pmemiany u ° ss Then Significant Im eq MnigaWn In<o etatl $ignificam Im etl No I q e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (~) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (r) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (r) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (,.) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (~) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) The protect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site The developer wdl be required to channel the surface runoff from the site to the proposed street, which in turn drams toward Archibald Avenue. The final drainage plan and report must be approved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer The impact is not considered significant. b) Based on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan, the protect site is outside of the 100-year flood plain, however, the site is adjacent to a small 100-year flood zone that encompasses the Klusman storm dram channel immediately west of the site The protect has been designed to dram to the east Also, street improvements and drainage faalities shown in the protect design wdl reduce some of the existing flow into the Klusman storm dram channel c-e) As a standard condition of protect approval, the applicant must prepare a preliminary drainage study showing how stormwater runoff wdl be conveyed A final report will be requred pnor to issuance of grading permits or final map recordation Since grading onsite will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) The SWRCB will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or stormwater conveyance channels BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion dunng the rainy season The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant: ~~NB~ ~/~ Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff wrfl be handled both during construction and operation Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the prolect by the Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified m the SWPPP wrfl make this impact less than significant. E f-Q The prolect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge Patenlially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Patant~ally un~°iass Tin Significant Mingalion Significant No I C Into etatl Im act I act 5. AIR DUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (~) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () () (~) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (~) cause any change in climate d) Create objectionable odors () () () (r) Comments: i a) The proposed prolect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Distract, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distract, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAOMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects. The I criteria pollutants screened for included: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides '' (NO,), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o). Though not regwred, ~ construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated ` i using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trap Generation Manual 6`" edition values ! programmed into the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the residential nature of ' the proposed prolect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of light passenger vehicles and decrease the number of medwm and heavy-duty diesel trucks The proposed prolect operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of signrficance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to mirnmize the protect contribution to regional emission of criteria pollutants .~ -~.J • 'b~ H ~a /~!~ ~ I Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAOMD thresholds during grading activities for PM,o and NOx, nor SCAOMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx Tables 1 and 2 show proiect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated. However, since there are existing residential units within the vicinity of the site, and since the region is in non-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust will be mitigated by the following measures The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403. 2. Adjacent streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site during such episodes. i f 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. b) Dunng construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and egwpment, and fugitive dust generated by egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO, and PM,o levels in the area. The following mitigation measures wdl ensure impacts to existing residential units are at less than significant levels. 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. i ,I C~ 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. ~ F~ ~~ ~/~e Initial Study for SUBTT 16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary /Pnundc nor rhv\ Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet. Met Unmet. Met Unmet Met Unmet. Mit. Gradin 4 83 4 83 58 58 55.65 - - 25 53 11 15 Worker Tn s 0 09 0 09 0.13 0 13 0 25 0 25 0.02 0 02 Stationa E ui 0.34 034 0 27 0.27 - - 0 02 0.02 Mobile E w 2.72 2.58 23.76 22 57 - - 1.99 1 89 Arch. Coatin s 40 87 38 82 - - _ _ _ _ As halt 2 62 2 49 - - _ _ _ _ Totals 51.46 48.91 82 74 78 63 0 24 0 24 27 56 13 08 SCAQMD Thres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si rnficance No No No No No No No No As shown in Table 2, operation activities at the site will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6'" edition values, the URBEMIS7G model estimates vehicle trips associated with a designated land use The proposed protect includes the construction of 15 single- famdy lots. Based on the number of lots and residential land use, the ITE associates a trap rate of 12 07 taps per day per dwelling unit. Approximately 181 05 trips are associated with the protect This amount of traffic is minimal and will generate 0.25 pounds of CO emissions per day Traffic associated with the protect was protected to occur in the area as the site is designated Very Low Density Residential and is expected to generate related traffic traps Emissions associated with these vehicle trips are below SCAQMD thresholds (Table 2) Table 2 Operations Emissions /Pounds npr rhvl Source ROG NOr CO PM,o Unmrt. Met Unmet. Mrt Unmet. Mit. Unmet Mit. Area Source 0 75 0 75 0 19 0 15 0.08 0 06 0.00 0 00 Mobile Source 3.06 3 O6 2.18 2.18 27.18 27 18 1.29 1.29 Totals 3.81 3 81 2 37 2 33 27 26 27 24 1 29 1 29 SCAQMD Thres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si mficance No No No No No No No No c-d) The proposed protect is the subdmsion of 9 23 acres of land into 15 single-family lots, a density of 1.6 units per acre, in accordance with the Very Low Density Residential Distract The end use of the proposed protect will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or obtectionable odors b ~ 1-F `10 M./iq i Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Panes 11 Polanhally Si9nihcanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pclanliallr Signifcant I ap a Kass Mngahon Inco raIBC m;n Signihcent Im eci No Im acl ti. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result ~n a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment) (°) ( ) () (~) () (~) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ( ) alternative transportation (e.g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) • O U (~) O O (~) O O (~) g) Rail or air traffic impacts? O O O (,,) Comments: a) The proposed protect includes the construction of 15 single-family lots Based on the number of lots and residential land use, the ITE associates a trip rate of 12.07 trips per day per dwelling unit Based on this trip rate, the proposed protect will generate 181 05 trips per day. Archibald Avenue provides primary access to the site and secondary access will be provided via Klusman Avenue The proposed protect will complete any missing improvements to the protect frontage on Archibald Avenue and Klusman Avenue. The proposed protect is consistent with the goals of the Development Code that designates the area Very Low Density Residential The protect proponent will be required to construct the necessary street improvements and as contained in the conditions of approval for the protect, pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect. b-d) Access to the site will be provided by a proposed street into the subdivision from Archibald Avenue, as well as provide half-width street improvements to Klusman Avenue along the west boundary of the site The proposed access will allow full access without impeding the through traffic Access for emergency vehicles will be adequate with all on-site streets to have 60-foot right-of-way widths e/f) The proposed tract development will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists as adequate points of ingress/egress will be provided and adequate parking . will be provided within the proposed driveways and garages No bus turnouts are proposed Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 Page 12 g) Located approximately twelve miles northwest of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft POtanhelty Signrficent Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentm~~y u~s Tna~ Significant Mingeuon Srgmhcant No I ct Inco aleC 1 ecl Im C 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result m impacts to• a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (~) habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated species (e g., heritage trees, () () (r) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g , () () () (r) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.) d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (~) vernal pool) e) Wddlde dispersal or migration corndors~ O O O (~) Comments: a) The site is disced and vegetation is cut annually to control weeds and prevent the threat of fires. The only significant vegetation on the site are the Eucalyptus trees (discussed below) that are in generally poor condition The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure IV-3 b-c) Eucalyptus windrows occur in a grid-like pattern along the north and south boundaries, and mid-way through the site These are mature; however, some are sucker growth from stumps that have been previously cut down The trees would be removed by grading and development of the site, which requires review and approval of a Tree Removal Permit. Windrow replacement is required by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. A Tree Inventory and Evaluation was prepared by a certified arborist The trees along the south boundary (29 trees) are actually off-site, located on the adjacent property to the south, and therefore not impacted by the proposed development The remaining 21 trees are generally of poor form, damaged from winds, topped at 15-25 feet in height, or are sprouts from stumps As mitigation, all will be removed and replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata, 8-feet on center, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. • • • e) The surrounding development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past Existing development includes residential development in all fiJ~ H ~2 Mlz~ Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 directions surrounding the site, with development immediately adtacent to the north and east of the proposed protect PWeni~ally Spnifirant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenbelly Iml>att unless Le35 man Sgnificant MeigeLOn Sipnifiesm No Im ett Into aletl Im tt Im h 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (~) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (r) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (~) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments• a-b) The protect will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation c) The protect site is located in an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2) An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization Additionally, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan does not identify the area as occurring in an aggregate extraction resource area (Figure IV-2, General Plan) Poleniklly Sgnifieant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potemiely u~ess ine~n Significant Mrtigeoon Sgnifiwm No Im ad Incro eteE I ecl I ett 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () ( ) () (r) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to• oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () ( ) () (r) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () ( ) () (r) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (r) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (~) brush, grass, or trees Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Comments: a/c/d) Based on the current state of the site (vacant with minimal human disturbance) the site has not been used for commercial or industrial purposes b) Improvement of Archibald and Klusman Avenues will include appropriate lighting, curbs and sidewalks to ensure standard emergency response times and efficient evacuation of residents in the event of an emergency Additionally all streets, adtacent and within the proposed development, will have standard pavement widths to provide adequate emergency-vehicle clearance e) Development of the proposed protect would remove the ruderal vegetation from the site, improve Archibald and Klusman Avenues with standard street pavement sections, extend water service and provide adequate fire suppression egwpment within the area These improvements will reduce fire hazards within the area. Potenlblly $ignifiwnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pctanlwlly w°ass Tha Sgrnficant Miogaoon Significant No I acY Into eteC I ct Im ct 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result ~n• a) Increases in existing noise levels O O (~) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? () () (~) ( ) Comments: a) The protect would add people and traffic to the area and generally increase ambient noise levels since the site is currently vacant However, the impact is not considered s~gmficant as the protect is consistent with the Development Code, Very Low Density Land Use Distract, and is surrounded by like land uses b) The proposed protect is the development of 15single-family lots on the west side of Archibald Avenue and approximately 425 feet north of Hillside Road The extension of infrastructure and utilities in the area, and specifically the extension of Klusman Avenue on the west boundary, may generate additional residential development along the west boundary of the site. The additional 181 travel taps per day may incrementally increase ambient noise levels at the proposed site. However, based on the Very Low Density Residential designation and large lot sizes (averaging 25,000 square feet), future traffic noise in the area is not predicted to exceed City noise limits Therefore this impact is considered less than significant. • ~ ~ N ~y M~~3 U • Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Potentially Sigmhwnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potennelly UnOes T sn Signiacant Mnigeuon Signfiranf No Impact IncoryorataA Impact Impact 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result m a need for new or altered government services m any of the following areas a) Fire protections O O O (,.) b) Police protections () () () (~) c) Schools () () (r) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? () () (~) ( ) e) Other governmental services () () () (r) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The protect site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, 425 feet north of Hillside Road and is served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District The nearest fire station is a located on 19'h Street, west of Archibald Avenue (Station No. 171) located within 2-miles of the protect site. The Distract is responsible for evaluating the protect through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process The proposed protect will include structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Police Protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriff's Department The proposed residential development will include standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and doors. Additional police protection is not required as the addition of 15 single family residential homes will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled as the protect site is small, approximately 9 acres Schools -The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this condition, impacts to the School Districts are considered to be less than significant Parks -The proposed 15 single family lots will not generate a substantial number of new people to the area. Impact fees are collected at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, the new residential community will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. c) Public facilities -The proposed residential development will not significantly increase traffic on adtacent streets and it is consistent will the City's Very Low Density Residential district. The protect proponent will be required to construct necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the ~jF N ~S M/z Y Initial Study for SU BTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect Therefore, this impact is considered to be less than significant. Potentially Sgmhceni Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentaly a %ss in;~ Significant Mnigauon Sigm6carrt No Im as Inc raletl Im eq Im act 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result ~n a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utdrt~es a) Power or natural gasp () () () (,.) b) Commurncation systems O O O (~) c) Local or regional water treatment or distnbution O O O (r) facihties~ d) Sewer or septic tanks O O O (~) e) Storm water drainages () () (,.) ( ) f) Solid waste disposals () () () (~) g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (~) Comments• a-g) The proposed subdivision will include the development of 15 single-family lots Development of the lots will require extension of existing utilities available in the immediate area. Utility systems installed to serve existing development within the area are adequate, and will not require mator modifications or alterations Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler Waste will be disposed of at the County of San Bernardino Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill The protect will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site. A Drainage Report will be required to address protected storm flows and proposed storm dram construction (see Issue 4 above) Drainage Plans must be included in application submittals in addition to the Final Drainage Report for Building Official review and approval Therefore, no mitigation is required. Potentialy Signlficem Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potaneally u ° u m~ Spnificanl MpigaOOn Sign~hcant No Im act IrMO rated I act Im act 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal• a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (r) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (r) c) Create fight or glares O O O (r) ~~ N9~ M /,~s Initial Study for S U BTT 16262/D R C2 001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Comments• a-b) The protect site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway view corridor The area is designated Very Low Density Residential, the proposed protect is consistent with the Development Code for this distract c) The protect will create new light and glare as the site is currently vacant However, the site has been identified as an area to include residences under the General Plan and Development Code New light will be typical of a small residential neighborhood and would not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as other future residential development in the area U Polent~ally Srgnnc~ant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantrally u a ~ ;na SlBmficanl Mitigation Srgnrficanl No I n Inco 91atl 1 ct Im act 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb Paleontological resources () () () (~) b) Disturb archaeological resources? () () () (~) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (~) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses within O O O (r) the potential impact area Comments• a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources. Additionally, the site is located in an area that is essentially surrounded by development and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the viandy of the protect site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated to occur. Paiantwlly Signlimanl Impaq Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Palentialty unless roan Significant Mrag00on Srgnlficani No I aq Inco area Im aq Im ct 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities Comments• a) The developer of the protect will be required to pay park development fees as a condition of approval The impact is not considered significant A~ I~9~ ~/z~ Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 b) The proposed protect will be constructed on vacant land, which is designated Very Low Density Residential The area surrounding the protect site is designated residential and is vacant, developed or proposed for development PWeneally Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantally Impact Unless Less Then Significant Mtllgetion Significant No 1 ep Inco etaC Im act Im ecl 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the () (~) () () potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mafor periods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () () (~) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () (~) () are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () (r) () ( ) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The 9.23 acre site is undeveloped vacant land, that is annually cleaned and disced for weed control purposes The site is framed and bisected by existing Blue Gum Eucalyptus The Initial Study identifies the removal of Eucalyptus windrows, which are designated as heritage trees, as a significant adverse impacts to biological resources As mitigation, all existing eucalyptus trees will be removed and replaced with Eucalyptus maculata (15-gallon) 15-feet on-center in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the Development Code b4~~~ • • ~~~ • fl ,I ~~ .~ , Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 Page 19 b) The Initial Study identify short-term impacts to air quality with development of the protect site However, the short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction actroities and do not exceed established thresholds The impacts will cease once construction activities are completed Implementation of mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study will reduce short-term impacts to less than signficant c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of bwldout in the City and sphere of influence The Crty made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required d) Development of 15 single-family lots would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. ~~ {~95 ~r/~ ~ Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 . Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized m completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (~) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR -City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (~) General Plan -City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) p~ µ loo M`zQ • Initial Study for SUBTT16262/DRC2001-00584 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature ~J ii ~ Date / Z ~ ~ ~ Print Name and Title ~~//ir4 ~ f/ ~E ~.~~ - ~j~ N l01 ~/~.n • City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Dedaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the Calffomia Environmental QualltyAct Section 21091 and 21092 of the public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Development Review DRC2001-00584 Public Review Period Closes: January 9, 2002 Project Name: Project Applicarrt: Plectra Development Co Project Location (also see attached map): Located between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, approwmately 427 feet north ofthe centerline of Hillside Road -APN 1061-561-02 Related files Development Review DRC2001-00584 and Tree Removal PermR DRC2001-00585 Project Description: A request to subdnnde 9.23 acres of land into 15 single family lots m the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling unds per acre) and the desgn review of house elevations and detailed site plans FINDING . This rs to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ailing as the lead agency, has conducted an Inkial Study to determine if the project may have a sign card effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The In~6al Study shows that there ~ no substantial evidence that the protect may have a s~gnficant effect on the environment. ® The Initial Study identified potentially sgrnficant effects but (1) Rev~ons m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the apphcant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signficant effects would occur, and (2) There r; no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a stgn~icant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support thrs finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The projedfile and all related documerrts are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (809) 477-2750 or Fax (908) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. • January 9.2002 Date of Determination Adopted By ~~ N 1oZ RESOLUTION NO 02-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262, LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND KLUSMAN AVENUES, APPROXIMATELY 427 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF HILLSIDE ROAD IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1061-561-02 A Recitals 1. Piedra Architecture and Development filed an application for the subdivision of Tentative Tract SUBTT16262, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Avenue, with a street frontage of 473 feet and lot depth of approxmately 852 feet and is presently vacant, and b The property to the north of the subject site is Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with asingle-family neighborhood, the property to the south is largely vacant with one single family residence within the Very-Low Residential (1-2 dwelling urnts per acre) Distract, the propertyto the east is developed with asingle-family neighborhood within the Very-Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) District, and the property to the west is Very-Low Residential (1-2 dwelimg units per acre) and has asingle-family residence, and c The protect is designed in conformance with Very Low Residential standards and Hillside Development regwrements, and . d The propertyfalls within the Equestrian Overlay District and contains improvement features in conformance uvith the intent of the overlay district provisions, and e The design of the protect, including roadway alignment, trails, and grading will provide effinent use of land to accommodate single-family homes b~ H X03 1 i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-05 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 January 9, 2002 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows. That the proposed protect is consistent wrath the ob~ecUves of the General Plan, and b That the proposed design is in accord moth the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located, and c. That the proposed design is in compliance ninth each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will noYwill be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance wrath the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat ' i upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the ! Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and e~ibits, and the information provided to the ' Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein bythis reference • ~p~ H log{ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-05 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 January 9, 2002 Page 3 Planning Division 1) All development improvements shall be designed in accordance Huth the Master Plan of trails and adopted trail standards 2) The trails easements shall be widened to 20 feet at the entry points off Archibald and Klusman Avenues (Lots 1, 8, 9, and 15) in order to accommodate vehicle gate with side access per FeederTrail Transition City Standard Plan 1006-B Provide curb cuts from the public streets at the intersection of the Community Trail and the feeder trail transitions to allow supply vehicle access to the pnvate trail easements. Said standard improvements shall be implemented pnorto occupancy In addition, signs shall be provided at the pnvate trail entnes notifying the public that the trails are private and of trail use prohibitions (i.e , motorcycles, ATVs, etc ) 3) The pnvate trail fencing shall be provided along the outside easement line with continuous 2-rail PVC trail fencing similar to that required along the Community Trails Perimeter tract walls shall be located inside the easement line on each lot with 10-foot Hnde lockable gates to • designated corral locations 4) The Archibald Community Trail crossing at the new street intersection shall be provided with a rough finish (non-slippery) for the safety of horses and nders Said pavement finish shall be to the approval of the City Engineer 5) The trail along the south property line be graded northerly at 2 percent to the gutter that drains to Archibald Avenue A 5-foot retaining wall (Huth trail fencing along the top) at the southern tract boundary, at Lot s 11 and 12, maybe necessary and acceptable to accommodate the trail grading 6) Potential corral locations shall be shown on the Grading Plan with access paths from the lower/higher portion to the corrals (for those houses that do not have exits directly on to the corral levels) The paths shall be locatedlgraded for simple access by property owners to the corrals. Engineenno Droision 1) Archibald Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Secondary Street" standards as required InGuding, but not limited to curb, gutter, street trees, community trail, traffic stnping, signage and street lights 2) Archibald Avenue frontage shall provide for a Class II Bike Lane b~ N I~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-05 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 January 9, 2002 Page 4 3) Klusman Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Local Street" standards as requred including, but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, traffic stnpmg, signage and street lights. 4) Klusman Avenue shall be constructed with a minimum 40-foot street easement and 26-foot pavement A study shall be submitted to determine how Klusman Avenue nght-of--way will match up with the existing offer-of-dedication to the south Subject to the results of the study modify Klusman Avenue improvement plans as necessary 5) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electncal, exceptfor the 66kV electncal) on the opposite a side of Archibald Avenue shall be paid to the City pnor to the approval of the Final Map The fee shall be one-half the City adopted urnt amount times the length of the protect frontage 6) Alexis Street frontage improvements shall be in accordance vHth City "Local Street" standards as required including, but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, traffic stnpmg, signage and street lights Sidewalk shall be regwred on the south side of Alexis Street only No decorative pavement shall be installed Hnthin the street nght-o~way 7) Concrete "V" gutters for both trails shall be installed along the north edge of the trail and sized fora 0100 storm The southerly trail shall be tilted to drain to the north at a 2 percent slope. A drainage study shall be submitted to the City Engineer supporting the "V" Gutter design 8) A "Letter of Acceptance" for offsite grading and a public drainage easement from the terminus of Klusman Avenue southerly to a public street or easement is regwred pnor to the Planning Commission heanng. Environmental Mitioation Air Qualdy 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabdmng agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Adtacent streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of . sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction '[~~ ~ ebb PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-05 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 January 9, 2002 Page 5 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energyefficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance month the manufacturer's speafications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or Gean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statementthatwork crews will shutoffequipmentwhen not in use Water 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented durng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for rewew and approval by the City Engineer Brologrcal Resources 1) All the on site trees will be removed as authonzed by a Tree Removal Permit As mitigation, all will be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata, 8-feet on center, as regwred by the Tree Preservation Ordinance The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY C~ ATTEST Larry T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary ~ D~ Hib~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-05 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 January 9, 2002 Page 6 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-vnt AYES• COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS• • ~~ H (OFS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-OS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16262 January 9, 2002 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d The design of the subdivision is not likelyto cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and The tentative tract is not likely to cause serous public health problems; and f The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. b That the~repesed des~g ;,s+n ~^^^`;eeblesNvesef-the-9evetepraen~6ede ..a a,... „a she a ~~...« ,., .,ti ,.ti .he ~ ro ,~ i,.....,oa ..a d That the re 6Sed-d ~ `~^' '~ '~ ~ ~~^ ~~ ~ tie ~siga~oge~,~;~„-R,e-send+t~ea~-apP..oa~.~~,-.erete~wtl Mn .n 4h... n hr ' ' 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain sigmficant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been .~ ~t-l /°y r'1 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Development Review DRC2001-00584 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division • 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~j~ N (05 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the Clty staffs is needed, as determined bythe protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The project planner or responsible Clty department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Forth After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action Is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact Issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies If compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto Is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the Clty Said plan shall identify the reporter as an Individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been Implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved bythe Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the Issuance of building permits I \FINAL\CEOAVv1MP Form-rev wpd r ILJ 'D~ H I10 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUB TT 16262 (DRC 2001-005841 Applicant: Ptedra Architecture and Development Initial Study Prepared by: Nancv Ferguson Date: December 18 2001 c . /'C Z Prior to Issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs .. CP/CE B _ R i f P •~ - -. '~~" to be Implemented dudng the pedod the site Is under construclon ev ew o lans C 2 BMPS shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the Ciry Engineer .~r ~-~ -~ - ~{~j p"Alr~~iu~)ItyF ~~" ~ ' ° * i ~~ ~ ,-. •4I ~ . L + - ~ ti Y• 4 S-9 e v 'C The site shall be treated with water or other il t bi yy y it qV~~ > ..Idi CP n ,, ~a C a ~ • ~ 45rt~. ~ta^fa"-~. {r, "~,M~~Fx ~dh ~. so s a lizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM70 Review of Plans C 2 emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Adjacent streets shall be swept according toaschedule established by CP C the City to reduce PM70 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of Review of Plans C 2 t soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon lima of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM70 emissions from the site dudng such CP C Review of Plans C • episodes 2 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 CP C hours or more to reduce PM70 emissions Review of Plans C 2 The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment CP B used on-site based on law emission lectors and high-energy efficiency Review of Plans C 2 The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans Include a statement that all construction equipment vnll be tuned and maintained In accordance vnih the manufacturer's specifications The construction contractor shall utilize electdc orclean altemetive fuel CP C Review of Plans C 2 powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP B Review of Plans C 2 plans Inclutle a statement that work crews will shut o(f equipment when not in use bba•.- ar. s 1 ~' , ~ ' ~ t~• 1F V. ~ -- Dl ~.~.. , si ~ '~ .fi J. • -'4 Cr_. '~'-': +31 r. .75.4 .. /4+Yi' » ~~'~ . t~ . c, y - ~3 ~~{'itiQ~!. ~f. iq ^• All trees scheduled for removal shall be replaced with 15•gallon CP g Review of Plans ~ . t Eucalyptus Maculate, 8-feet on center, as required by the Tree C 2 Preservation Ordinance Ke to Checklist Abbreviations „Responstble~ rso- ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~M~~r - ~l~ Ari ,Q" ~~"" ~";.,, ~ ; CDD -Community Development Director A - W Ith Eech New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - Clry Planner or designee B • Pdor To Construction 8.Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Clry Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Cenl(ICate of Occupancy BO • Building Omcial or tleslgnee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operatlng 5 - Relaln Deposit or Bonds FC - Flre Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEOAWIMCHKLST WPD .. ^nT' 1 • ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT16262 SUBJECT: Subdtvtston of 15 Vacant Lots APPLICANT: Piedra Architecture 8 Development LOCATION: West Stde of Archibald Avenue, North of Hdlstde ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the altematrve, to relinquish such approval The appltcant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Ctty may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such parttapation shall not relieve appltcant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or Ctty Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, bwlding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Ctty Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and • grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations t '(~£ H I-3 SC-11-01 1 Comolehon Date -~-( / / -~-~- / / Protec t No SUBTT16262 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / ' of Approval shall be completed to the sattsfaction of the City Planner _ _ 3 All site, gradtg, landscape, trngation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / I consistency pnor to issuance of any permds (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ _ building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved ~ use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ _ ~ time of budding permit issuance i 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be / / ~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete _ _ _ ~ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single I family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / ~ adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map _ _ _ ~ 7 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, Penang, and weed _/ / control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review _ _ and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Frnal Tract Map and prior to approval of i street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including Penang and drainage dewaas, in contunction with street improvements ~ a Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as / / ~ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall _ _ _ i be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs j b Locai Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora / / ~ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the _ _ _ street Drainage devices may be required by the Budding Offiaal ~ c For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least _/_/_ one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with I appropriate fencing Any Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine / / ~ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot _ _ _ owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the nea:ssity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' assoaations for amendments to the CC&Rs 1 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restncttons (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _ / / Homeowners' Association are sub/ect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions _ _ ~ and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the ~ City Engineer The Homeowners' Assoaation shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes i •,f0 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / / lots for Ctty Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ _ requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing • sc ~.l-od ~~ Htl'~ 2 ~I Prgect No SUBTT16262 Comolehon Date Landscaping 1 A deta+led landscape and +rrigat+on plan, including slope planting and model home landscap+ng in _/_/ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also +nclude one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall +nclude a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy . 4 For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold ' and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition I !5 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ . E sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Archibald ~ Avenue t E. environmental .I Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the - i amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures i Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit i F. Other Agencies • I +~ The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for ~ mad boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the +ssuance of . ~ bwlding permits l SC- •I-01 TJ~ MIS 3 ~ Protect No SUBTT16262 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: . G. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior publtc streets, -/ / community trails, publtc paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment - _ and maintenance, and publtc drainage faaltttes as shown on the plans and/or tentattve map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentattve map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / / street centerline) - - - 52 total feet on Archibald Avenue / / 40 total feet on Klusman Avenue _%j_ 3 Corner property Itne cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards -/-/- 4 All existing easements lying wtthtn future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the / / final map --- H. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped _/ / areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Ctty Standards - - Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street Itghts, and street trees . 2 A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement, wtthtn a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be -/-/- constructed for all half-section streets 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety Itghts -/_/- on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engmeer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the publtc and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in publtc right-of-way, fees shall be paid and aconstruction -/ / permit shall be obtained from the Ctty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits - - required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / / interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer - - _ d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / / protect along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and _ _ _ interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer • SC-11-01 ~4 N {I~p 4' Protect No SUBTT16262 Comolehon Date Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing Ctty roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to tom and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Archibald Avenue J. Drainage and Flood Control It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologiGhydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows m the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street p~N~~~ SC-11-01 5 ( -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/_/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- Protect No SUBTr16262 Comole4on Date K. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them L. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~ ~ • -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. 5~.,,-0, b~N~iB s . '.~' - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ ~ , FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0537 PROJECT #: SUBTT16262 PROJECT NAME: Piedra Architectural Development DATE: December 19, 2001 PLAN TYPE: 15 SFR Hillside Dlstnct APPLICANT NAME: Piedra Architectural Development OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 FLOOR AREA (S): Greater than 3,600 s f TYPE CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: Westside of Archibald North of Hillside FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locate, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Alan Warren ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The Technical Revew is normally the second stage in the Development Review process involving Fire District review The following conditions of approval were identified in the initial protect review and have not been addressed by the applicant Although we have tried, not all Fire Dlstnct regwrements for the proposed protect may be included Additions to or changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire District regwrements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Division to obtain Fire District approval If your protect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Drvision to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Required Note: The required fire flow for this protect shall be 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes one fire hydrant is required per 1000 gallons of required fire flow NOTE If regwred fire flow cannot be provided for the oroiect all structures Fire District approved mitigation is regwred 3 Required Note. The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ilt-B, as amended ,~ ~ N ~ -G 4 Public fire hydrants located with a 500-foot radius of the proposed may be used to provide the required fire Flow sub/ect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 5 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combust bulding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing matenals, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fve Safety Division 7 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 10 Required Note Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner B. Water Availability 1 Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire Flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avarlabrlrty for Frre Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If suffiaent water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow C. Fire Access 1 Residential (Single-family)-Required Note: Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, th'L' applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes All public roadways shall comply with the standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Pnvate roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 2 Roadways and Fire Lanes- Required Note: Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets and courts from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line Ali proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when a dead~nd street exceeds 150 feet or when othennnse required Applicable CCBR's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways vnthout prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 3 Requued Note Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 4 Required Note Each phase of a development must comply with Fire District access roadway requirements The Fire District will not accept roadways that will rely on future construction to provide access roadways to meet minimum standard All structures located on dead-end or substandard access roadways shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed in accordance with the applicable standard 5 New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry D. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for All Maps and Plans) 1 This protect is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" based on proximity to or exposure urban -wildland intertace Mitigation measures are regwred The building(s) shall be constructed in accordance with the standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay District-Area FR-1 or Area FR-2 'p ~ N Ito 2 Landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Fire Safety Division for review of proposed vegetation A groundcover, shrubs, plants, and trees are regwred to be fire-resistive in accordance Nnth publishes references The plant palette shall include the common name for all vegetation The landscaping plan sha identify all native species proposed for retention ! 3 For asingle-family dwelling protect located in the Hazardous Fire Area, a simplified landscapingffue modification plan may be acceptable The plan shall detail the minimum thuty (30) foot minimum defensiblc space and proposed and/or existing vegetation The Fire Dlstnct can provide a single page sheet o standard¢ed notes for inclusion on the construction plans Call (909) 477-2770 to obtain a copy, and tc determine rf your protect Is eligible E. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note: Prior to the Issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets FIre District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible matenal is placed onsite. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. F. Architectural Bwlding Plans 1 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Dlstnct Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for any required notes to be placed on the plans pnor to submittal G. Fire Dlstnct Service Fees' 1 The following fees may be applicable to this project and are being identified at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs. Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required Installations subject to approval by the Fire District. The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted. When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division " $66 Preliminary Vegetation ManagemenUFuel Modification Plan (Includes SFR In-fill lots) '' Plus a microficheAaser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Droision ' Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire spnnklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 2 The following service fees are due to the Fire Dlstnct and payable at this time• $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) $ 732 -Total due at this time. Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire Dlstnct." " Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division 'Note: Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the FIre Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire spnnklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans H. Plan Submittal Reqwred Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction In accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fve, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans '~~ N l~l RESOLUTION NO 02-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00584, LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND KLUSMAN AVENUES, APPROXIMATELY 427 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF HILLSIDE ROAD IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1061-561-02 A Rentals 1 Piedra Architecture and Development filed an application for Development Revew DRC2001-00584, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 3 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 4 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows• a The application applies to property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Avenue, with a street frontage of 473 feet and lot depth of approximately 852 feet and is presently vacant; and b The property to the north of the subtect site is Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with asingle-family neighborhood, the property to the south is largely vacant with one single family residence within the Very-Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) Distract, the property to the east is developed with asingle-family neighborhood within the Very-Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) Distract, and the propertyto the west is Very-Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) and has asingle-t~mily residence, and c The protect is designed in conformance with Very Low Residential standards and Hillside Development regwrements, and ~~Hi~~. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-06 DRC2001-00584 January 9, 2002 Page 2 d The propertyfalls within the Equestrian Overlay Distract and contains improvement features in conformance with the intent of the overlay district provisions, and e The design of the protect, including roadway alignment, trails, and grading will provide effiaent use of land to accommodate single-family homes 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds and concludes as follows That the proposed project is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b That the proposed design is in accord Hnth the obfectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance Hnth each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vanity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Morntonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance wrath the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration Huth regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain signifia3nt environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all sigrnfiaant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as condtions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Irntial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and e~ibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~ 4, ~-I l23 i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-06 DRC2001-00584 January 9, 2002 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein bythis reference Planning Diwsion 1) Approval is subtect to all applicable conditions of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 and City Counal approval of Final Tract Map 16262 2) Provide dnveways with a maximum slope of 15 percent. Provide a grade break and level area behind the driveway apron m conformance with Engineering Diwsion standards 3) Provde 18-foot area in front of garage that does not exceed 5 percent slope and a 6-foot area behind the driveway apron that does not exceed 6 percent 4) Provide minimum 5-foot setback between fencing on comerside yards and sidewalk I I 5) All development improvements shall be designed in accordance with the Trails Master Plan and adopted trail standards 6) Grade access from the corral area to trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum vHdth of 10 feet 7) Plot houses such that there is reasonable rearyard opportunity for the keeping of horses and other animals within the Equestrian/Rural Area 8) Along the equestrian trail perimeter, landscaping shall be predominately Eucalyptus varieties to emulate the area's windbreaks 9) Taper three or four car dnveways down to standard two-car width at street ,I ~,~ 10) Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing terrain, and present a more natural appearance 11) Establish proper sod management techniques to reduce the adverse effects (i a erosion) of grading 12) Coordinate exterior building design on all elevations from building to budding to achieve the same level of design quality 13) Avoid identical color schemes plotted on adjacent lots 14) Use native rock for fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products ~b~N~2~1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-06 DRC2001-00584 January 9, 2002 Page 4 15) Design chimneystacks with accent materials used on house, such as back or stone, except interior chimneys. 16) Provide decorative perimeterfencing (i.e., masonry) at tract edges and along streets "Decorative" means stucco finish, split face block or similar textured surface with native stone plasters and a cap Smooth precision block is not acceptable 17) Vary wall setbacks adtacent to mator thoroughfares to increase visual interest. 18) Retaining walls exposed to public wew to be decorative masonry 19) Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic-coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views 20) Retum walls and corner sidewalls to be decorative masonry and compatible with the architectural style If more than one style of house design exists, then a simple wall design is preferred 21) The trails easements shall be widened to 20 feet at the entry points off Archibald and Klusman Avenues (Lots 1, 8, 9, and 15) in order to accommodate vehicle gate with side access per Feeder Trail Transition City Standard Plan 1006-B Provide curb cuts from the public streets at the intersection of the Community Trail and the feeder trail transitions to allow supply vehicle access to the private trail easements Said standard improvements shall be implemented pnorto occupancy In addition, signs shall be provided at the private trail entries notifying the public that the trails are private and of trail use prohibitions (i e., motorcycles, ATV, etc.) 22) The private trail fencing shall be provided along the outside easement line with continuous 2-rail PVC trail fencing similar to that required along the Community Trails Perimeter tract walls shall be located inside the easement line on each lot with 10-foot wide lockable gates to designated corral locations 23) The Archibald Community Trail crossing at the new street intersection shall be provided with a rough finish (non-slippery) for the safety of horses and riders Said pavement finish shall be to the approval of the City Engineer 24) The trail along the south property line be graded northerly at 2 percent to the gutter that drains to Archibald Avenue A 5-foot retaining wall (with trail fencing along the top) at the southern tract boundary, at Lots 11 and 12, may be necessary and acceptable to accommodate the trail grading ~ s N Iz5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-06 • DRC2001-00584 January 9, 2002 Page 5 25) Potential corral locations shall be shown on the Grading Plan with access paths from the lower/higher portion to the corrals (for those houses that do not have exits directly on to the corcal levels) The paths shall be located/graded for simple access by property owners to the corrals If model homes are proposed, one of the model home sites shall include the installation of a horse corcal, subject to the City Planner's review and approval Engineenng Division 1) All applicable conditions of the approving resolution(s) of Tentative Tract 16262 shall apply Environmental Mitioation Air Qualdy 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilmng agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance oath SCAQMD Rule 403 • 2) Adjacent streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energyefficiency The construction contractorshall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's speafications 6) The construction contractorshall utilize electnc or clean altemahve fuel powered egwpment where feasible 7) The wnstruction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading • plans include a statementthatwork crews will shutoffequipmentwhen not in use tj ~ N ~ 2(0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-06 DRC2001-00584 January 9, 2002 . Page 6 Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented dunng the period the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval bythe City Engineer Boo/og~ca/Resources 1) All the on site trees wdl be removed as authonzed by a Tree Removal Permit As mitigation, all wdl be removed and replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus Maculata, 8-feet on center, as regwred by the Tree Preservation Ordinance The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY. Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, bythe following vote-to-vwt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C~ 'p t N 12~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 and Development Rewew DRC2001-00584 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Forrn will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 b~Nt2~ Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the Clty staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible Clty department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure Is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Fonns for an impact Issue requinng no further monitonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planneror responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner Is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planneror responsible Cltydepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible Clty department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planneror responsible Clty department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responslble City department has the authority to hold Issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are Implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the Clty These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requinng long-terrn protect monitonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitonng the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitonng results to the Clty Said plan shall identdy the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been Implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits 11FINALICEOAVv1MP Form-rev wpd 1~~ HI29 • MITIGATION MO Project File No.: _SUB TT 16262 (DRC 2001- NITORING C 005841 A • i HECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) pplicant: Piedra Architecture and Development Initial Study Prepared by: Nancv Ferguson D ate: December 18 2001 • ~~ IIU~t't~ .. , .. .. . ,, Prior to Issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall Itlentity BMPS CP/CE B Review of Plans C to be Implemented dudng the period the site Is under construction 2 BMPS shall be Identitled on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer < ~~ y "~ ~ , The site shali be treated with water or other soli stabilizing agent CP C Review of Plans C . .Ax~i>.t 2 (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) dally to reduce PM70 emissions, In accorcfance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Adjacent streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by CP C Review of Pio C the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle trackin of ns 2 r1 V g soil off-site Timing may very depending upon tlme of year of construction .M Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM70 emissions from the site during such CP C Review of Plans C 2 episodes Chemical Boll stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all Inadive construction arses that remain inactlve for96 CP C Review of Plans C 2 hours or more to reduce PM70 emissions The constmcton contractor shall select the construction equipment CP B Review of Plans C 2 used on-site based on low emission fedors and high-energy ei6dency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans Include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained In accordance with the manufadureYS specifications Theconstrudion contractor shall utllize electric ordean attematlve fuel CP C Review of Plans C 2 powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that consirudlon-grading CP B Review of Plans C 2 plans Indude a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use v~ ~, _ ,., rc All trees scheduled for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon CP B Review of Plans C 2 Eucatyptus Maculate, 6-feet on center, as required by the Tree Preservation Ordinance CDD -Community Development Director CP -City Planner or designee CE -City Engineer or designee BO -Building Ofdclal or designee PO -Police Captain or designee ~ FC - Flre Chief or designee I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEQAWIMCHKLST W PD ~~ , W A - Wlih Each New Developr B - Pdor To Constructlon C -Throughout Consiructlon D - On Completion E - ODeratina A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Finat Map B • Other Agency Pertnil /Approval 2 - W Ithhold Grading or Building Pertnlt C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP • ~* COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00584 SUBJECT: Development Review for SUBTT16262 APPLICANT: Piedra Architecture & Development LOCATION: West Side of Archibald Avenue, North of Hillside Road ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any acbon brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Crty, its agents, officers, or employees may be requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such acbon but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included m legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenVDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations SC-11-01 'b h ti 13 ~. Comole6on Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- I / Protect No DRC2001-00584 2 Pnor to any use of the protect site or business actively being commenced thereon, all Conddion, of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Ctty Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code ant State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Pnor to occupancy, plans shall bt submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Divisioi to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall bt submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street Improvement plans shall be coordinated fo consistency prior to Issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approves use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building penult issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Clty Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map 10 All building numbers and Individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, including proper illumination 11 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and pnor to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fenang and drainage devices, mcon/unction with street improvements Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way Ilne to prohlbd trail debns from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official c For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fenang 12 Any Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' assoaations for amendments to the CC&Rs 13 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Assoaation are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the Clty Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Assoaation shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the / / -/-/~ -/-/- / / -/-/- / / -/_/ / / / / -/-/- / / / / -/-/. -/-/- -/-/-~ SC-11-01 2 'b f F-( 133 Prgect No DRC2001-00584 name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes . 14 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property -/-/ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of budding permits 15 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 16 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each _/_/_ support post far all wood fences, with a minimum of two'/ranch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 17 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant / / 18 Slope fenang along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to / / maintain an open feeling and enhance views --- 19 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk /_/_ 20 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured / / products - - - D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in -/-/- the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 6 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development I -/-/- Code This regwrement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting sc.,1-o, s b4 H l3~ Protect No DRC2001-00584 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Division 7 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along Archibald Avenue 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this pro/ect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 11 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) or an alternatroe acceptable to the City Planner is regwred at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) E. Environmental Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requved to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices H. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/_/. -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/-/-~ SC-11-01 4 tJ £ n ~ 3~ Protect No DRC2001-00584 I. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibdtty APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED C~ -~_~. SC-11-01 5 '~£ ~ ~3~0 . '..~4 ~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ ~~_ .~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0537 PROJECT#: DRC2001-00584 PROJECT NAME: Pledra Architectural Development DATE: December 19, 2001 PLAN TYPE: 15 SFR Hillside Distract APPLICANT NAME: Pledra Architectural Development OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Diwsion 3 FLOOR AREA (S): Greater than 3,600 s f LOCATION: Westside of Archibald North of Hillside FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protection Plamm~g Speaalist • PLANNER: Alan Warren ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire Distract regwrements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result m additional or changed Fire Distract regwrements Please make the necessary changes or corrections pnor to resubmitting for review Prior to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed All Fire Distract conditions and comments must be addressed for construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Dvision to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water District 2 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Fire flow regwrements for this protect shall be 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of • 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delnrering any combustible bwlding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builderldeveloper shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division ~ ' ,3 ~ tj f N 5 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bulder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan for review and approval Include main size 7 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation oiReflechve Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner B. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection Distract Water Avatlabdrtv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection Distract If suffiaent water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be requred in each structure affected by the msuffiaent flow C. Fire Access 1 Fire Distract access roadways shall include public roads, streets, highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets and designated fire lanes 2 Residential Pnor to recordation of a subdivision/tracf/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fve Distract access roadways and fire lanes Ait roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 3 Residential 8 Commeroial Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submil and obta~ approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or pnvate, from the Fire Distract in consultation with th Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow Irne All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obsWctions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications m fire lanes or access roadways vnthout pnor wntten approval of the Fire Distract, Fve Safety Division 4 Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire Distnct's approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fire Distract access roadways/dnveways 5 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the folloHnng Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches m height shall be provided and maintained free and Gear of any obstructions at all times dunng construction, m accordance v~nth Fire Distract Standards 6 New residential buildings shall post the address wdh minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be rntemally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry D. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for All Maps and Plans) 1 This protect is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" based on proximity to or exposure urban -wildland interface Mitigation measures are required The bwlding(s) shall meet the construction standards contained in the San Bemardrno County Fire Safety Oveday Distract, Area FR-1 or Area FR-2 2 Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program 3 Pnor to the issuance of any grease grading or building pertmt, the applicant shall obtain Fve Distract approval of a final fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of nsk to the struct~ res by vegetation ~j s ~ 138 4 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit or Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall have completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the protect area Approval is subtect to final on-site inspection 5 Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan shall be installed The Fire District shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modification areas Further, the installed fuel modification plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire Disthct The CCBR's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modfcaton zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subtect to (annual) triennial inspections 6 Phased protects or temporary fuel modification plans must meet the requirements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire District E. Combustible Construction Letter Regwred Note Pnor to the issuance of a building perind for combustible construction, the bwlder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be rn place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times F. Fire District Fees Due 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" v~nll be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans G. Plan Submittal Required Notice Plans shall be submitted and approved poor to construction m accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at Ume of submittal of plans Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision ~ ~ i'J`1 ."~~,+ T H E C I T Y O F ANCHO TJCAMONftA Staff Report DATE: January 9, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, City Planner BY• Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-23- LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to allow service to patrons 18 years and older for an existing restaurant with sports barand gnll, Including entertainment, dancing, amusement devices, and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages in the Community Commercial Distnct (Subarea 3), located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard APN• 1077-601-07. (Continued from • November 28, 2001) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 00-02 - LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to renew an entertainment permit to allow, disc tockey music, dancing, satellite television, and amusement devices (pool tables, dart boards), and allow service to patrons less than 21 years of age In conjunction with a bar and restaurant in the Community Commercial Distnct (Subarea 3), located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard. APN 1077-801-07 (Continued from November 28, 2001) BACKGROUND. On October 10, 2001, and again on November 28, 2001, the Planning Commission continued the public heanng on these Items, at the applicant's request, to allow time for the applicant to address concerns related to overFlow parking The Police Department has issued revised comments on the protect and recommends that the operation not be allowed to serve patrons less than 21 years old The applicant has met with Police staff and is explonng a revised modification request, including sectioning off a portion of the nightclub for service to patrons younger than 21 years old, where no alcohol wall be served. The applicant is not ready to provide staff with revised business plans for review and has therefore requested that the application be withdrawn Resp Ily su Brad City Planner BB.BLC\ma • Attachment. Exhibit"A" - WlthdrawalRequest ITEMS E,F r agci~ai Le Count, Brent From: ELAKKEES~aol com . Sent: Fnday, December 28, 2001 3 33 PM 70: Blecount~a rancho-Cucamonga ca us Subject: Re Twins Club Brent, we received you a-mail, thank you, Robbie and i agree with you, and would like to retract our request for the modification of our cup 97-23, if you have any questions please feel free to give me a call thank you, and happy holidays , Eddie and Robbie Lakkees ~J r~ U E,F 2 1/2/02 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 9, 2002 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rick Fisher, Assoaate Planner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14872 -BANYAN REALTY GROUP - A request for a time extension of a previously approved tentative parcel map to subdivide 20.8 acres of land into 12 parcels, 11 in the General Industnal Distnct (Subarea 3) and 1 in the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of 8th Street between Cucamonga Creek channel and Hellman Avenue - APN. 209-151-27 and 37 and 209-161-24 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map 14872 on December 8, 1999, fora 2-year penod This is the first request for an extension. ANALYSIS. A. Subdivision Map. On January 6, 1999, the City Counal amended the City's Subdivision Ordinance to establish a 3-year initial approval penod for tract and parcel maps (increased from 2 years previously) The amendment also allows the Planning Commission to grant time extensions in 12-month increments for up to 5 years (a maximum of 8 years from the onginal time approval), which is the maximum allowed under the State Subdvision Map Act Section 66452.69 (e) The maximum life of this project would be up to 8 years from the date of approval (final expiration on December 20, 2007). B Environmental Assessment• The Initial Study has been prepared and staff found that conditions in the areas have not changed appreciably since the Tentative Parcel Map was originally approved on December 8, 1999. CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all properly owners Hnthin a 300-foot radws of the protect site. ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR TPM14872 -BANYAN REALTY GROUP January 9, 2002 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a 1-year time extension for Tentative Parcel Map 14872 through the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB RFyc Attachments. Exhibit "A" - Letter from applicant, dated October 24, 2001 Exhibd "B" - Vicirnty Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Map Exhibit "D" - Initial Study Resolution of Approval for Time Extension for Tentative Parcel Map 14872 ~2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCNmONGA $ A~ YA N • OCT 2 4 2001 October 24, 2001 Via Hand Dehverv RECENED -PLANNING ATTN. Counter Planner REALTY G R o u e City of Rancho Cucamonga -Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE' Request For Tentative Parcel Map Time Extension - TPM #14872 20.8 Acres North Side of 7`s Street, Westerly of Hellman Avenue -Rancho Cucamonga To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of Cucamonga Investments, N.V., the owner of the above referenced property, we aze hereby requesting a time extension for Tentative Pazcel Map #14872. Due to uncertain and unfavorable mazket conditions, especially subsequent to the September 11 tragedy, the ownership has not been prepazed to move forwazd with final mapping and development of the project. At this tune, the ownership believes that the mazket demand for small industrial lots in this area of Rancho Cucamonga continues to be weak and is accordingly requesting an extension of time for the map. In addition to tkus letter request, the following required forms and fees are enclosed and summarized below • Uniform Application • Environmental Information Form (including photos and 8-1/2 x 11 excerpt of topo map) • Updated Contact List • Required Public Heanng Information (Including a Property Ownership List On Gummed Labels and a 300 Foot Radius Map) • Check #941 for Filing Fees Totaling $1,224 00 (Time Extension Fee of $549.00 plus Environmental Assessment Fee of $675.00) After reviewing our letter request for a time extension and the enclosed information, please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or comments. My telephone number is (949- 727-3600 Extension 22). I look forwazd to confirmation that our time extension application is complete. Sincerely, BANYAN REALTY GROUP For Cucamonga InveN. V i Bret M. Gove n BMG:Ik A cc: Andre Skaf ~3 114 PACIFICA • SUITE 230 IRVINE CALIFORNIA 92618.3318 • TES (949) 727.3600 FAx (949) 727.3699 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Vicinity Mao Zy EXHIBIT: - ~~.. ~J ~~f ~_~- s `t 6 t~~M1. `t.~~ y ~,yot ~ •; ,_. • J__`~Vi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M~ M 6TH 5T. 3 ~~ l~ :~~ 1 ~.~+~T /_ ~~•r~ • •~f+~ ~ wl ~t~ . ru• i ~ SFr i ~' i ~~~t I,.9 9 fY ~y a ~d -f• ~'~'.a z ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ i~ __ ~ j i ~i~ "fi ~ ~ [ '"t r~-,--~- .~ - . , i'~-ter NORTH 1" = 400' _ ITEM: Tentative Parcel Map 14872 TITLE: Tentative Mao 5 EXHIBIT: Cny o/Rancho Cucamonga Plannwp Omsron taoe) arr-rrso CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OCT 2 4 2001 RECENED -PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the responslbllrty o/the applicant to ensure that the appl~cat~on Is complete at the time of submittal, Clty staff wdl not be available to perform work mgwred to provide missmg m/ormabon -`~ 7rNt l~'7 Z, Applicat~onNumber/orthepro/ecttowhlchthlsform ~/~~oo~ ~0~~ f ~~~ ~~ peRams l~ Project Tentative Parcel Map 14872 -North side of 7th Street, westerly of Hellman ~e Title NameBAddressofpro/ect Cucamonga Investments N.V owner(s) i IRVINE, CA 92618 Name 8 Address o/ developer or pro/ecf sponsor Banyan Realty Group - Bret Gove 114 Pacifica, Suite 230 Irvine. CA 9261R Contact Person & Address Bret Gove 114 Pacifica, Suite 230 Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 727-3600 T Lo C J I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Paqe 1 Name 8 Address of person preparing this /orm (d ddferent /rom above) Number '1) Provide a full scale (8-12 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the pro/ect sde, and md~cate the site boundaries Z) Provde a set o/color photographs which show reprnsentatne views into the sde /rom the north, south, east and west, views into and from the sde /rom the primary access points which serve the ste, and reprnsentat~ve wows o/significant /eatums from the mte Include a map shoknng location of each photograph 3)ProlectLocabon(descnbe) TPM 14872 -located on the north side of 7th Street westerly of Hellman Av n~ tty of Rancho Cucamon a 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (attach add~hona/ sheet d necessary) 209-151-27; 209-151-37; 209-161-24 r~ LJ 'S) Gross Sde Area (adsq R) 20.8 acres +/- ~6) Net Sde Area (total sde srze minus area of pu6l~c streets & proposed ded~cabons) 17.1 acres +/- 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the pro/ect sde (attach add~bonal sheet d necessary Not Applicable ("N/A") T 11PLANNINGIFINAUFORMSI000NTERIINITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 2 In/onnat~on md~cated by asterisk (') is not requm;d o/non-construcbon CUP=s unless otherwise requested by stall 8)Include a descnpbon o/al! permds which wdl be necessary /mm the Cdy o/Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies m order to lolly implement the pmlect: A final map and building prints would be required to develop the site. 9) Describe the physical setting of the sde as d exists belore the pm/ect ~ncludmg inrormahon on ropogrephy, sod stabilr(y, plants and arnma/s, mature tees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing shuctures on site (indudmg age and cond~hon) and the use o/the structures A(fach photographs of s~gmficant features described. In add~bon, srte a// sources of rnlormabon (i e , geological and/orhydrologrc studies, biotic and amheolog~cal surveys, Gaffic studies)• The site represents vacant land with no existing structures. The site slopes gently from the northeast to the southwest and drains into the ad3acent Cucamonga Creek Channel. The perimeter of the site is fenced and no roads or trails cross the property. The soil on the site is generally stable and some native vegetation (weeds - no mature trees) covers the site. 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/orhrstoncal aspects of the sta. Site all sources of rnlormabon (books, published reports and oral history). There are no known cultural or historical aspects to the site. 1 8 I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTERVNITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 3 11)Descnbe any Horse sources and themlevels that now af/ect fhe srfe (arroreft, roadway horse, etc) and how they wdl aBect proposed uses. Low levels of noise from road traffice on 8th Street current/ exists. Such noise should not effect the proposed industrial use for the site. 12)Descnbe the proposed pm/act rn dated. This should provide an adequate descnpbon of the srfe in terms of ulbmafe use which wdl result from the proposed pro/act Indicate r/there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion o/each increment Attach addrbonal sheet(s) r/necessary. The site represents a 12 lot tentative parcel map (TPM 14872) zoned for industrial uses. The lots range in size from 0.8 acres +/- to 4.0 acres +/- and the map shows 7th Street extending north through the site to connect with 8th Street. Industrial buildings ranging in size from 12,000 sf to 70,000 sf are envisioned on 12 lots, with the majority of the buildings in the 12,000 sf to 17,000 sf range. Use types permitted in the General Industrial Zone (Sub area 3) are expected. The timing of buildout and phasing of this project are uncertain at this time due to market conditions. 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, including rn/ormat~on on plants and animals and any cu/lure/, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commero~al, etc), intensity o/land use (one-famrty, apaRment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, /rontage, setback, rear yard, efc) Vacant industrial zoned land is adjacent to the north and east, with an existing GTE Telephone facility adjacent to the east fronting 8th Street. To the south/ southeast there is an existing residential community (paired homes) and to the west is the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Farther west of this Channel is an older single family home residential community. There are no known cultural, historical o¢ scenic aspects to the surrounding properties. 14)Wll the proposed pro/act change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/act? T 1 I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Paae 4 15) Indicate the type of shoR-term and longderm nose to be generated, mGudmg source and amount How will these nose levels arfect adjacent propeRies and on-site uses What methods o/sound proofing are proposed? Typical construction-related noise and road noise from autos and trucks accessing the property will be'g~aerated. These noise levels should not significantly effect adjacent properties or the proposed on-site industrial uses. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature orscenic hees• N/A 17) lnd~cate any bodes of water (mcludmg domestic water suppkes) mto which the sde drains The site drains into a concrete channel -Cucamonga Creek Channel 18)lndicateexpectedamountofwaterusage. (SeeAttachmentA/orusageeshmates) For/urtherclan6cation, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Residenbal (gal/day) Peak use (gaUDay) b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) 1, 500 Peak use (gaUmiNac) 19)lnd~cate proposed method o/sewage disposal. Septic Tank R Sewer. /f septic tanks are proposed, attach pen:olahon tests. l/discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generahon• (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For fuRher clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987- 2591 a Resrdenhal (gal/day) b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) 2,D00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20)Numberofresldenfialunds• N/A Detached (militate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size ~~ LJ L~ 11PLANNINGU=INAL\FORMS\COUNTERUNITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 5 Attached (md~cate whether units are rental or/or sale unds): N/A i 21)Ant~apated range of sale pnces androrrents. N/A Sale Pnce(s) $ to Rent (per month) $ to 22) Specdy number o/bedrooms by urnt type. N/A 23) Indicate anbc~pated household size by unit type N/A 24)lndicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the prolecL Contact the appropnate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment B a Elementary. N/A b. Junior High: N/A c SemorH~gh N/A COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or lunchon(s) of commercial, mdustnal ormsbtubonal uses Unknown, however, we anticipate industrial use types permitted in the General Industrial Zone (Sub area 3). 26) Total floor area olcommemial, mdustnal, ormsbtubonal uses by type 261,000 sf of general industrial uses could be developed on the site assuming a 35Y building to land ratio ~~ I \PLANNINGIFINALIFORMS(COUNTER\INITSTDI.WPD 3/00 Page 6 27J Indicate hours of opershon Unknown 28) Number of Total employees' Unknown Maximum Shdl 1Tnknnwn Time of Maximum ShiR• Unknown 29)Provide breakdown o/anhapated fob c/assificahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an Indication o/the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet dnecessary) Unknown • 30J Estimahon o/the number of workers to be hired that curranUy reside in the Gty Unknown '31)For commercial and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract at (81 B) 572-6283) Unknown ALL PROJECTS 32J Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood conho! agenaes serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine their abilrty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect7 If so, please indicate their response No r~ L~ T \Z I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTERVNITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 7 In the known history of th,s property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic materials? 33)Examples of hszardous and/orfozre matenals include, but are not limited to PCBts, radoactive substances; pestiudes and herb,crdes, fuels, o,/s, solvents, and otherflammable bquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any olthe above. Please list the matenals and descnbe then use, storage, andror discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rl known. No 34J ill the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazaniaus and/or toxic materials, rncludwg but not limited to those examples listed above? II yes, provide an inventory of alt such materiels to be used and proposed method of disposal. The loeaban ofsuch uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No ~ I hereby rerbfy that the statements furnished above and,nlhe attached ezh,brls present the data and rnlomrafian required for adequate evaluabon olthrs project !o the best olmy ability, that the facts, statements, and infirmabon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. 1 /urther understand that additional rnformabon maybe requirod to be submrfted before an adequate evaluabon can 6e made by the Cr(y of Rancho Cucamonga. X Date• ~ r o~ X Signature nn X Title. yry L Sct QQ?.~,.a I.IPLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERUNITSTDI WPD 3/00 ~ ~~ ~o_nrr_oaa~ aa•zc. oeo~a~~a~a Page ti P_12 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT14872 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: A request for aone-year time extension for a previously approved tentative parcel map to subdivide 20 8 acres of land into 12 parcels, 11 in the General Industnal Distnct (Subarea 3) and 1 in the Low-Medwm Residential Distnct (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of 8th Street between Cucamonga Creek channel and Hellman Avenue - APN 209-151-27 and 37 and 209-161-24 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Banyan Realty Group 114 Paafica, suite 230 Irvine, CA 92618 5. General Plan Designation: General Industnal (Subarea 3) -19 acres Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) -1 acre 6. Zoning: General Industrial -19 acres Low-Medwm Residential - 1 acre 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Metrolink tracks to the north, flood control channel to the west, GTE facility and vacant land to the east, partially completed condominium protect to the south. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Droision 10500 Croic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rick Fisher, Assoaate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: Metropolitan Water Distnct T1~1 Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 rolenlwny $IgNfiteM I,npea Lest Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 volenueiiy SlpMficant unless MNpetlon Then SlpMfiwnt Na i a m lea I a i a ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, Involving at least one Impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact' as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ()Land Use and Planning () Transportation/CiroulaGOn ()Biological Resources ()Public Services () Populabon and Housing ()Energy and Mineral Resources () U61iUes and Service Systems ()Geological Problems ()Hazards ()Aesthetics ()Water ()Noise ()Cultural Resources () /Ur Quality Mandato Findin s of Si nficance ()Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the pro)ect, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Signed. Imo.. Rick Fisher Associate Planner December 17, 2001 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the Callfomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects Identified LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal a) Conflict with general plan designation or () () () (X) zoning b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (X) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the pro)ect~ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (X) vicinity? _. \S Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 aamnay Sipniflmnt Inged Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~ mni rnwn~aon SIG~oa r+, i m lea i a i d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (X) established community Comments a-d) The proposed protect was designed in accordance with Development Code Standards The protect site is located on the south side of 8th Street, east of the Cucamonga Creek Channel and west of Hellman Avenue The site has a general plan designation of General Industnal (Subarea 3) and Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) No increase in densely or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no impacts well result from the protect. r1 LJ 2. POPULATIONANDHOUSING. Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed offiaal regional or local () () () (X) population protections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (X) directly or indirectly (e.g ,through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (X) housing? Comments• a-b) The proposed protect is the subdivision of 20.8 acres of land into twelve parcels. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan land use for the site and well not result m a significant increase in population not otherwise planned by the City in its forecasts c) There are no structures on site. 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEJNS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving a) Fault ruptures () ( ) () (X) b) Seismic ground shakmg~ () ( ) () (X) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () ( ) () (X) d) Seiche hazards () ( ) () (X) e) Landslides or mudflows? () ( ) () (X) f) Erosion, changes m topography, or unstable () ( ) () (X) sotl conditions from excavation, grading, or fill • g) Subsidence of the lands () ( E l ) () (X) X h) s () ( xpansive soi ) ) () ( i) Unique geologic or physical features? () ( ) () (X) ~`P Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Pdentlally SlpniBrent I~ad less Issues and Supporting Information Sources seam nod®p~p„ s,o mm~l ro I In tin I I a Comments: a-Q No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The site is not located near a body of water Therefore, no impacts are antiapated 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, () ( ) () (X) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related () ( ) () (X) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () ( ) () (X) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () ( ) () (X) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () ( ) () (X) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () ( ) () (X) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquder by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge cepability~ g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwatert () ( ) () (X) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (X) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (X) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) The protect is expected to result in incremental changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns due to an increase of paved surface area The City Engineer must review and approve site and drainage plans that show that all runoff will be conveyed to existing and proposed drainage facilities, which are designed to handle the subject water flows. b) The site is located within a special flood hazard area inundated by 100-year flood plain (Zone A), however, the storm drain faalities in the area provide adequate flood protection to the protect site c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water Storm water runoff will be conveyed to the existing public storm drain system as approved by the City Engineer C~ Z ~~' • Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Potenpally Sipnlpmnl bryacl Leu Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,~ w'~; r~e~don aP eom ,,, I a m fee i i f-i) The prolect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area because the site is not used for groundwater recharging 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () () (X) ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitroe receptors to pollutants? () () () (X) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, () () () (X) or cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? () () () (X) Comments: a) The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Distract, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distract, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects. The cntena pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Though not regwred, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6th edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model In order to reflect the industrial nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to decrease the number of light passenger vehicles and increase the number of medwm and heavy-duty diesel trucks The proposed prolect operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is innon-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o), mitigation measures will be used to minimize the project contribution to regional emission of cntena pollutants During operation, exhaust emissions from trucks and employees traveling to the site will increase CO levels in the area As shown in Table 2, operation activities at the sites will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6th edition values, the URBEMIS7G model estimates vehicle taps associated with a designated land use The residential component of the prolect will generate 102 trips per day, while the industrial lots would generate 1,065 traps per day Traffic associated with the prolect was protected to occur in the area as the area is designated General Industrial and is expected to generate related traffic taps Emissions assocated with operation of the prolect are below SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2). Z `~ Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 PotenlWlly SiBNflfanl Impecl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources 9~flm ~ tnnglanm s~ nt No I a I lee I a I a Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary Pounds er Da Source ROG NO, CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet. Mit Unmet. Met Unmet Mit. Demolition - - - - - - Gradm 1 24 1.24 18.21 18 21 - - 21.88 14 58 Worker Tn s 0.05 0 05 0 07 0.07 0.13 0.13 0 01 0.01 Stationa E w 034 034 0 27 0 27 - - 0.02 0.02 Mobile E w 3 02 2 86 29 12 27 67 - - 2 30 2 18 Arch Coatm s 31.27 29.71 - - - - - - As halt 210 1.99 - - - - - - Totals 38 00 36.18 47 68 46 22 0 13 0 13 24 21 16 79 SCAOMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si rnficance No No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G EXISTING Operations Emissions (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet. Met Unmet Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet Met Area Source 0 78 0.00 1 50 0.00 0 42 0 00 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 22.24 21 79 34.13 33 39 217 24 212 67 10 46 10 23 Totals 23 02 21 79 35 63 33.39 217 66 212 67 10.46 10 23 SCAOMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds during grading activities for PM,o and NO^, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NO, Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented. Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated Additionally, painting activities will increase ROG levels. The model simulates all structures will be painted at the same time (worst case) However, it is likely that painting activities will be spaced out and will not occur at the same time If painting activties do occur simultaneously, Mitigation Measure No 8 will ensure emissions are below SCAQMD thresholds Since the region is ninon-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust will be mitigated by the following measures. 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) da11y to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. • • Z ~~ Initial Study for TPM 14872 r1 LJ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 aolenuelly SlgNfimnl bryea Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Safi®ni rtiu~~n S19~oN Ne I a m lea I a I a 2. Streets leading to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. b) Dunng construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces vlnll increase NOx and PM,a levels in the area The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to the existing residential development near the site are at less than signficent levels. 7. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 2. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 3. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use. 4. Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of 80 days. c-d) The proposed protect is a parcel map to allow the development of 19 acres of General Industnal land uses and up to 8 dwelling units on 1 acre. The end use of the proposed protect would not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes Since the end uses of the 19 industnal acres is unknown, the issue of generating objectionable odors uvill be addressed at such time as individual projects are proposed through the development design review or conditional use permrt process 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result m a) Increased vehicle taps or traffic congestions () () () (X) z. Zo Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Polentlally $IpnlflWnl Ir,paa Las Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~IpN om ~ ~ Sipnfimm No I a m lea I a I a b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g , () ( ) () (X) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g., farm egwpment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () ( ) () (X) nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capaGty on-site or off-site? () ( ) () (X) e) Hazards or bamers for pedestnans or () ( ) () (X) bicychsts~ f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () ( ) () (X) alternative transportation (e.g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rad or air traffic impacts () ( ) () (X) Comments: a) The parcel map subdivision will not result in increased vehicle tnps compared to the current vacant land However, when the parcels are developed the protect wdl generate new tnps because of the new construction The number of trips is not considered significant, therefore, the protect does not warrant a Traffic Study Analysis The proposal is consistent with the General Plan for which the street widths were evaluated at a build-out condition b-c) The site will have adequate access for emergency vehicles once all of the proposed streets are constructed. d) The protect design will meet the parking standards of the Development Code once the parcels are developed. e-g) The site is not close enough to any airport to need noise or hazard abatement measures. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result ~n impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or () ( ) () (X) their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated species (e.g., hentage trees, () ( ) () (X) eucalyptus Hnndrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () ( ) () (X) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )? d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () ( ) () (X) veinal pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration comdors~ () ( ) () (X) Z 2~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TPM 14872 Page 9 Paenuany SlBnifionl Irryaa Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Palenbally S~Bnificent Unless Mltigabm Tlwn Signifirant Na 1 a m tea I a 1 a Comments: a) The prolect is not within any known endangered species or habitat areas. b-c) There are no existing specimen trees on the prolect site and therefore there will be no impact d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site e) The prolect site is cut off from undisturbed Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub by development and bands of non-native vegetation. It is not in a migration comdor. r1 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal• a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (X) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (X) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (X) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a-b) The project will not conflict with any energy conservation plans nor be wasteful c) There are no known resources that would be a future value to the region and the residents of the State. L~ 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A nsk of accidental explosion or release of () ( ) () (X) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency () ( ) () (X) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () ( ) () (X) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () ( ) () (X) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () ( ) () (X) brush, grass, or trees Z 22 Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Palmbatly 519rofifanl Inpad Leaa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g FWmUafiy Sipnificent u"'~ MNpatlon 71ian Sipnifitant No 1 d In tetl I p 1 cl Comments: a, c-d) There is no evidence of prior commercial or industrial uses. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils have been observed There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site b) The parcel map subdivision has been designed to accommodate emergency vehicles and will be accessible after the construction of the future streets e) The site is not located in a fire hazard area 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? () () () (X) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? () () () (X) Comments: r~ L_J a-b) The parcel map subdivision will not increase existing noise levels because the site is currently vacant However, existing noise levels will increase at time of development. The increase in noise levels will not be in excess of that anticipated by planned land uses The prolect is consistent with other industrial uses nearby. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result m a need for new or altered government services rn any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? () () () (X) b) Police protections () () () (X) c) Schools () () () (X) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including () () () (X) roads? e) Other governmental services () () () (X) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -Standard conditions from the Fire Safety Division wil l be placed on the project so no additional impacts to fire service will occur Police Protection -Additional police protection is not required The parcel map subdivision of 20 8 acres will not increase the need for additional police protection in the area Schools -The proposed parcel map subdivision will not generate a substantial number of new lob opportunities or induce people to move to the prolect area. Z 23 L~ Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Potentially Signfirant Irryacl Lt6e Issues and Su ortrn Information Sources PP 9 Pwenuauy Slgnfi®m unless naeoenm Than &oafiam No I a I tea I ~ l a Therefore, the development of the project site would not adversely impact local schools However, consistent with the aty of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council, the developer will pay all appropnate development impact fees. Parks -The proposed parcel map subdivision will not generate a substantial number of new tob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area Therefore, the development of the protect site would not adversely impact local parks. Public Pastilles -The proposed protect will not greatly increase traffic on adtacent streets. Consistent with the city of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council, the developer will pay all appropnate development impact fees. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utdit~es a) Power or natural gas? () () () (X) b) Communication systems? () () () (X) c) Local or regional water treatment or distnbution () () () (X) facddies~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (X) e) Storm water drainages () () () (X) f) Solid waste disposal? () () () (X) g) Local or regional water supplies? () () () (X) Comments: a-g) The proposed parcel map subdmsion will extend, as necessary, existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area The proposed protect will not require mator modifications or alterations to the existing utility systems 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (X) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic () () () (X) effect? c) Create light or glares () () () (X) Comments: a-b) The surrounding area consists of other industrial areas. The proposed parcel map subdivision will not affect scenic vistas or have a negative aesthetic effect. 12`I Initial Study for TPM 14872 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Paenosoy ao"rc~~a I"pea Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s fi~ i Mtl"~~, s~~ ", Ne i a m fed i a i a c) The proposed parcel map subdivision will not create new light and glare. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? () ( ) () (X) b) Disturb archaeological resources? () ( ) () (X) c) Affect histoncal or cultural resources? () ( ) () (X) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change () ( ) () (X) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses within () ( ) () (X) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The project site is likely to have been disturbed and the likelihood of affecting histoncal or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered significant. 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () ( ) () (X) regional parks or other recreational faalities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? () ( ) () (X) Comments: a) An increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely, as the residential portion of the site is relatively small b) There is no impact to existing recreational opportunities, as the residential portion of the site is relatively small. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have () ( ) () (X) the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restnct the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory ~ ZS ~~ Initial Study for TPM 14872 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Polenbally SlpMfirant Irtpaa Lea Issues and Su ortln Information Sources PP 9 PotaiVa°~ Sgnififant u"~ MNgaban """ Sipaficant No I a m lee I a I a b) Short term: Does the project have the potential () () (X) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts () () () (X) that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (X) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The protect site does not contain Natural Resources as identified on figure V-3 of the General Plan Additionally, the site does not contain any Coastal Sage Scrub, Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, or Delhi-Sands flowering-loving fly habitat b) Dunng construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be emitted from grading the site and dust emissions could be sufficient to warrant the use of water or other dust palliatives at this site Sources of emissions during this phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces NO, and PM~o levels may be exceeded during this phase, however, the protect is below the AQMD Threshold of Potential Significance for Air Quality Impacts Any impact to air quality is thus considered less than significant. c) The cumulative effects of the parcel map subdivision may include incremental increased traffic within the immediate vicinity. However, the impacts are not considered significant The applicant will be required to pay appropnate transportation fees at time of development Fees are used to make roadway improvements within the area to keep the circulation system at acceptable levels of service d) The proposed protect would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The site is located in an industrial area Z 2lp 12/27/2001 V08:43 9497273699~s _• '• ww...~.M ml3/NfYAN~ BY: R CUCANONGA CON DEV; 12.16.1 4:45PNi 9084772947 °> Irntral Study for 7PM 1A972 EARLIER ANALYSES PA(~ 03/03 9497272869; #212 City o! Rancho Cucamonga . Page 14 F_arliar analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiefing, program EIR, or other CEQA proceRes, ono or more pifects havo been adequately analyzed in an earner EtR w Negative Deriaraunn per secaon 15oB3(c)(3)(D). The effect, identified above far thts project were within the scope of and edeyuately analyzed rn the fallowing earlier doeument(s) pursuant In applicable legal standards, and such eltects were addressed by mitigation mP-astrres based on the eadier anaysis. The following earlier analyses were ufAlzed in eorrtplating this Initial Study and are avadabla for review in Ute City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Clvu: Center Orive (trieck all that apply) (X) deneral Plan EIR (Certrhed Apr6 8. 1981) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1889 Cienerai Ptan Update (SCH #88020115, oertHled January 4, 1989) (X) industrial Area Spedhe F9an EIR (CertiNed September 19,1981) APPLICANT CERTIFICATIdN I rx!r1Ny that I am the eppllranl Inr the protect de~ibed Ift this Ini861 Study 1 acknowledge Uiat I have read tnrs Initial Study and the proposed mitigation mea&rr~. Further, I have ravrsed ttte prgod plane or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposatl rNtigatlon measures to avoid the effects or mi9gata the effects to a point whero dearly no sign6lcant environmental effects would occur. 5ipnalure..,•_7~2~~I r!" / •.,Date• ~%?+~~^p-~ Prrnl Name and Tina' ~~ ~ Ga"~ V"P ~ V • • = Z`~- City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The /ollowmg Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Time Extension for Tentative Parcel Map 14872 Public Review Period Closes: January 9, 2002 Project Name: Project Applicant: Banyan Realty Group Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the south side of 8th Street between Cucamonga Creek channel and Hellman Avenue - APN 209-151-27 and 37 and 209-161-24 Project Description: A request for time extension for a previously approved tentative parcel map to subdivide 20 8 acres of land mto 12 parcels, 11 in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) and one m the Low-Medwm Residential District (4 to 8 dwellmg units per acre) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the prolect may have a signficent effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially signficent effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is Invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. • January 9. 2002 Date of Determination Adopted By Z L~ RESOLUTION NO.02-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE EMENSION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14872, AND MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THEREOF, FOR 20 8 ACRES OF LAND IN 11-IE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3), AND THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET BETWEEN CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL AND HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 209-151-27, AND 37, AND 209-161-24 A Rentals. 1 Banyan Realty Group filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Parcel Map 14872, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 8, 1999, this Commission adopted its Resolution No 99-118, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On January 9, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 4 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, ofthis Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission herebyspecificelly finds as follows• a. The previously approved Tentative Parcel Map is in substantial compliance Hnth the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and b The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval will not cause significant inconsistencieswith the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies, and c The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and d. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance T 2~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-07 TIME EXTENSION FOR TPM14872 January 9, 2002 Page 2 3 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance vnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project that are listed below as conditions of approval c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the stafr reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califoma Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tentative Mao Applicent Expiration SUBTT14872 Banyan Realty Group January 9, 2003 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies the Conditions of Approval contained in Resolution No. 99-118 and the Standard Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows• Planning Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorneys fees, which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-07 TIME EXTENSION FOR TPM14872 January 9, 2002 Page 2 3 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration (and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project that are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for Tentative Map Applicant Expiration SUBTT14872 Banyan Realty Group ~~ December 8, 2002 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies the Conditions of Approval contained in Resolution No 99-118 and the Standard Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, ta-r~aa-a~ #eltews add the following conditions Planning Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees, which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at ~ 3O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-07 TIME EXTENSION FOR TPM14872 January 9, 2002 Page 3 its own expense, in the defense of any such action, but such partiapation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations underthis condition. Environmental Mdipation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabdiang agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance vnth SCAOMD Rule 403 2) Streets leading to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-sde based on low emission factors and high-energy effiGency The construction contractorshall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment vwll be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's spedfications. 6) The construction contractorshall utilize electric or dean alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statementthat work crews will shutoff equipmentwhen not in use. 8) Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of 80 days. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman 13~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-07 TIME EXTENSION FOR TPM14872 January 9, 2002 Page 4 ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dayof January 2002, by the folloHnng vote-to-vwt: AYES• COMMISSIONERS• NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS T 3Z City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map 14872 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Declaration/Environmental Impact Reportfortheabove-listed pro/ect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions ofapproval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance well be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelines As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon . recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forrns to ensure they are filled out correctly and properaction is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action well be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation well be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 I~ U ~ 33 Mitigation Monitonng Program TPM14872 Page 2 3 Appropnate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speGfic mitigation activities and provide appropriate wntten approvals to the protect planner 4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is requred for the speafic phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Fortes for an impact issue requinng no further monitonng wall be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forn 6 Unanticipated circumstances may anse regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Forn well be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures an; implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required penod of time 9 In those instances requinng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitonng the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner pnor to the issuance of building permits • ~ 3`-~ Project File No.: Time Extension for Parcel Mao 14872 Initial Study Prepared by: Rlck Flsher Applicant: Banvan Realtv Group Date: Decernhar 17 9(1(11 - - .. - ... -• w, /~ . . . . -~ . . ~. ~1- The site shall be treated vnth water or other sod-stabilibn '''x~~3 rtiM ~j ~i g agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o ertussions CP C Renew of Plans/ A 2 , m aabrdanaa wth SCAOMD Rule 403 As Neaessary StreeLS leading to the site shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Revlew of Plans/ established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoctated with As Necessary A 2/4 vehide tradang of soil off-site Timing may varydependingupon tlme of year of constructlon Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exaaed CP C Renew of Plans/ 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Trom the site dudn such g As Necossary q 2/4 episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall CP C Review of Plans/ be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain Inactlve for 96 As Neaessary A 2/4 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The consWdlon contractor shall select the consWdion equipment CP C Rewew of Plans/ used on-site based on low em,ssico (actors and high~nergyeffxiency As Necessary q 2 The construction contractor shall ensure the osnstructlon grading plans indude a statementthat all construction equlpmentwlli be Wned and maintained in accordancow(th the manufacturefsspeafiphons The consWctlon contractorshall utilize electricadean altematlvefuel CP C Review of Plans/ A powered equipmenl where feasible As Necessary 2 The construction contractor shall ensure that construdtion-grading CP BIC Renew of Plans A/C 2 plans indude a statementthalwork crews will shutoffequiprrrentwhen not in use Painting actinhes shall be spacod out over a penod offi0 days CP C Renew of Plansl q 4 As Necessary 1 u U t0 --- --~~-~~-••••, ----•-.•••-••• ~••~~~..• .., ..e~~tl„oo ..- ~nm eau, rvew ueveiopmenr A-tin-srte Inspection 1 - Wihhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pdor To ConsWdlon B -Other Agency Permit! Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Clty Engineer ar designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan rnarx a _ unrhr,nln cenie~~ro ..r nom... ~..~...,, -- --••-•••a v••~•~• ..~ ..o~~y~ Sao u - un wmpieoon U - Jeparete Submidal (Reports / Stutlies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operetlng 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee e _ Rwvnkw Cl IP MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 9, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A residential subdivision of 30 single-family lots on 11.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located north of Wilson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard - APN 225-071-66 and 67. Related files General Plan Amendment DRCGPA 00-05, and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRCENSPA 00-02 Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the protect covered by the prior Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study/Addendum PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 2 6 dwelling units per acre. B Surroundino Land Use and Zonin North -Vacant, Utility Comdor South -Vacant, Open Space and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Vacant and water storage facility, Utility Corridor and Very Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Vacant, and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Desionations Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North -Public Facilities -Utility Comdor South -Public Facilities -Park and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Public Facilities -Utility Corridor and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) . West -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 9, 2002 Page 2 D Site Charactenstics The site slopes to the southwest and is undeveloped No unique physical charactenstics are evident on the site The area is dissected by 3 minor washes that contain slight changes in topography, sod, and vegetation The vegetation wmmunity on site consists of Riversidean sage scrub ANALYSIS. A Backoround In June 1991, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors approved the University/Crest Planned Development m the City's Etiwanda North area. The University/Crest Planned Development entitlements combined two separately owned properties with 1,238 single-family lots, commeraal, school, park, and open space On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a revision to the Development Plan, which among other things separated the University portion of the development from the Crest portion The University portion of the development has since become Rancho Etiwanda The protect was re-designated from Public Faalities- Park to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and re-classfied from Open Space to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units par acre), by the City Council on August 1, 2001 B. General The current proposal is for a subdivision only, no home plans are yet provided. . The minimum lot size proposed is 10,000 square feet, hence, the project exceeds the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development regwrement fora minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet This unusually shaped property will share access to Day Creek Boulevard via local street "A" with a future intermediate school on the south side Street "A" will exceed 600 feet in length until it can connect to the adjoining tract to the southeast, therefore, fire spnnklers are being required in those homes beyond 600 feet from Day Creek Boulevard Lot "A" is proposed to provide secondary access to the Cucamonga County Water Distnct reservoir site to the east C Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on October 17, 2001 The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. D Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the project on October 16, and December 4, 2001 The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. E Environmental Assessment In June of 1991, the San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further EIR or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master EIR On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Development Plan, which among other things, separated the University (Rancho Etiwanda) portion of the project from the Crest portion The subject tract falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development In August of 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an S2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 9, 2002 Page 3 Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes m the project that would regwre a major revision to the previous EIR CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract SUBTT16100 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Condtions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DF\Is Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" Grading Plan Exhibit "D"- Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions ~~ S3 a /' ,; SITE UTILIZATION MAP u i TENTATIVE TRACT NO 16100 E%ISPNG USE VACANL , q E%ISTINC USE VACANT E%ISTINC ZONING VL COUNT INF A EXISTNC ZONING OS / ~ E CRERN ~NCHS CUCAMONGA ~- xA ~ e. ~ s MAT~ErtOF CALIP 6 ____-~-_ _-_ -- em,w m~.i.o....+m. ~.. s..is... ....ouRNIA ____ _______AO---_____-___ _ _ _ _ _ xP)ENe[P }~ '~, Iii) a[PC$ WN53 M[v y1 LOI$ ~OG __ _ _ _ _ __ - 1-1 ~) 'e ]e .LPCS R 2 LCR[PEO LOl$ l / E%ISTINC ZONING UC - -- -- I c -I ~ ~ _ -_ ,1 • !~ ~_ r- - _ - E%ISRNG USE VACANT % ~f I, ~L=1i JJ. ` ~ "~ `~ E%ISTNC ZONING L ~ . EI ST110 ZS INV Q 5 ~ ! ~ n~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~1 - r d~ ~ _ ~ ~ I ~tto~41~ ~ ®~ CST ~_ ~ p~ I I I Q EI{ISTINC ONINFe U C m.- ~~~• 1~,- ~ N F (- __ _-_ ~ ~ ~~ C APN 225-A)-68 ~ m.r (, - _ . .- - .I A,P N 225-OB-0< '4L+~ ~ I i , ~ ~A P N 225-0Z-6T ~ ~ ~„m~ ~_ ~~rll ~l ~ ~~ gXIGT~~I~AUr+TL...-~= 1 ~~~ o~ a...,r 11 I ~ ! ~zlsTr+c 2gwNFr os -- ( is ~ \ ~ ~, I ~ ~ ~! ~' ~ • r, _ _- ~ ~ - E 7 I ~ ~ ~ ~ SAD q+oyy~(~ral~ ~ a m ~...o.~~. r / , a I~ e ~ i ~I' PROPOSED I) +J ~~a"d ' _ 6Ngr. gPry AC Y.tl'a.~ Y~ TEMPORARY APN',225-OZI-53 ,. 6 EE YY V9Fq~liioo ~& Y ~`'~ 1' DEBRIS/DETENTION BASIN !%J ~q ~ Jt _'a ~~mT• E%ISTINC USE WCANT _, TL ( (~ N ~ ~~ + _ - EXISTING ZONING L iJ h I, r ~~~ „ ~ ~ ~ ~'O` ~~..~ __ ~ ~_ .e~ ~~ OoNV ~ 1~ ,.il ~~~.~ ~ , ~ ~~~ " ~ ` ~ C -- i ~ - i' d ~ i : _ ; '~ ~ E ~1 //~ ^~..,~ 4~~CA.~A-_,,,\~-f11._ll/_ ~~_ _, ~_,.,~;-~ _ ~~-- ;-~...~,,~ ~~c ~ 2 200 4fol /A ~ YC!°V~~ i 3 rlr y71~pe5P. - ~ 1 _ ~ `~~~` ..` , ~ / i / PLANS PREPARED BY I uAOaL n ASSOCUTES INc EE%m11NC INCC~ I ~ J 9~~~ Q ,~ -__ \1 _ - „_ =` ~ ~~'~., `_`_- ,l ~ ~ coxsunxc rnn EHGNEEPs _ -~_` Axo uxo ruxx[Ps / ! E%ISUNC USE VACAM 4 61P 9~"1~ - _ -_ oPOI cxuPCx smEET zullE io) E%ISTINC 20NING L ~ - ~\ `~) ~~ ~~ 4 PI)w S 1 A EXISTING USE VACANT , -_ _ (sw) 9ie-ion E%ISUNC ZONING L ~ I = I OF 1 DRATINCR .. n/Y~.. ro .~..,....,a ~~ ~F _ _ , ..~M -° TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ~ TENTATIVE TRACT NO 16100 '~ _ 4 IN THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, ~~~~~~ Tm~~4'.Y° /. COUNTY OP SA E RDINO SPATE OF C PORNIA /F/q - ~ a vim. n `ewwm eiO"'.. R~eo'n~'v°"m ' u°""'. o.-vn _ ° -~ NOVLMe[P ]000 1~)~CRER RpZS bLOK v~e~ °~°iO e1np °~O~ / °~ „~` ~/ r ~~ ~\ y\ °'O ]6 NCRCS N[l 3 LEIILREO 1015 r , ~ { ~~ d/ %,¢,, ~/ \~ \`\,_ ,o LZO aA.` Nyy sn -~.i __ ~j°~?I~=- _ ~y~s ~p/~ [\, LLSMSr - \O\za __ ~~ ~i'\ . m.~ ~ _ roAF - e. ! ~ ~ir< _ _ ~ t. y, ~( ob.zrlsz ~~sRi ' _ I J4°°z so L~i~ If a 1 5"~.~ `B ~~L,I ~~,p, ~pp ~, ill ~ qq __ _ ~~ >`. '~~ / i~ fT /Si sw. ~ I` ~\~\ ss- _ °AS yI,~ - ~,:, 1, ILLe~_~_ ~>o~ ,~ ~I _ - ~ $ _ _ ~ _ se S _ _ ! ` ioy~'L ~, Loin , /r ;~ LA U p ll~~~ - ___ I •~ _ ~~ '\ T _ _ LO Ws ,~ Lu aDS SS, -_i` ~L ~ . II, / /~ 1 ~ - _ - ~ a -_. i ~ ~ - _ • _ 4us yr - L ~~ ~1 i~ l~ R,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~1 ~ _ E _ __ _ ~ ~ TREEt ~ ::, ~ - _ I , u . . ~ ~~ - - _ __ - - - L ••°r~ ~ wr Y /~ ,q L' ~_ ' ~ ~ __~__ -- _ __- _~_~ ~iJt "'+="'b.:~==_ - -_t-t___~ zaoz si , ~~,n ~~ /r _ 1 ~ L~ f 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ _„ ,i ., e i~+pll+~ _ ~. G AL-9TgEEI (EAST ~F II 9TE LK --~ -DRI~~-, -- - ~- "-\~\ LLB sr / ~ ~ ~~ " I EI it ~~ II ru'~ rj ~~ _'(~a- ~ ~\~~//pp _~'JyL//~~_ _ .--__- vs. ua. ~L~ pREPeRL RL O O I - __ - _ - _ ~~wAnolc (ay`ASS~ollcwrES INc OE LHE INLWO ENPIFE m µnxc cNa Exax[[RZ m "B" C" AND 'D STREETS 'A STREET (IfEST OP IIFSTERLY SCHOOL DRIVE) 0 tANO nwvNERS 1 TYPIC9L_SIBEELSECTI4N T1PIC eT~Ct N losoi nuRCx s*R[[~ sDlrt ,oJ RINLIp CuUYOLN.A G 9t J]O IRK) RLe-un OF 1 DMT11 r CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN r ~_ ~ ~ ~~ ~••~ TENTATIVE TRACT N0 16100 ~ e° ~,-L I~l°°' ,~ "'° Y . ~ IN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAYONGA, ~t ~ ~• '° _ _ =A„• - -- _ ~ COUNTY OP SAN HBRNARpINO, 31'ATB OP CALIFORNIA ~ti ~d _~ - - ,- • r ~ ~ ~ r ` ` ECTI ~~ \ \ ~A emo.: r.m:wa.'° e.~w r NPEN9pL ]OLO ~• _ 11 eJ IGR6 U6SS rton JO l09 ~~ ... 1 ~ . ~~ _ • i 9 ON F-F _ t -~ „ t _ exe eLEEt xn+ , ~ e l[O[R[O Lp R _ _ ~ "^ v ~ ^~ _ ~ _ i 1 _ _ ~ 1- 1~ / 4 j ~ l _ = w+i wno SECTION N-H _ ~ ~ ey ~ E 8 C d )/ I ~ l i ~t : 40 73 ~ °~ E s~ ~ ~ _• ) ~ l .1 - r 16 ?7 r ?9 . L - r. ( ~ ~ /~1~ ~. .aQa y Y 8 - -]2~(ti ` a~ ~ 17' .,?.r j ifI -__~- ~9~~Q o _ e.,.~ ;,° ~ 1 __ - ~ ~ I / l T ....? 7Q ~ _ -1 / ~1( _ ~ ~B S 9emnn_meanua p I 2 a, ,~ m. ,. _\`/y 1' • ~ ~ f - FNMIINIlfi2v4TE ^ 'wu'I^ ~ _' py~¢ l __ - ~ ~~-,~} ~ 'axe-__ t~ ~ a ~~.r.,.. HC 1-I,-. _ _.i L.'Nil .t--__..... •___'_-__'r^ _'-T---_~__ -/ 0'1 - - ('..-1 ~...P.....a s~ a A- STREET (EAST OP RESTERLY SCHOOL Dp1VE) A ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 , _ ~~ ~~~ ~, ' t _,~ AC' _ j- ` 1 ~ /1 1^~ - - - ~ ` ` ..n..vumuemm.u.n SECTION A-A ~t - l i ° 1 ~ - A- STREET (HEST OP IIESTERLY SCHOOL DRIYE) 'eo 0 - ,--~ - '°~ _ _ SEC 12 2001 TYPICAL 9TRRET SECTION --~ fir: $~~ - "' ~ %~'= _ -- - - -~ PLANS PREPARED BY ~ i~ ~_~ ._-~`` j r~/-D _ _ _ _ _ ~ MI-pLE A ASSOCNiES IHC 't - ~ CIM5ULNIG fhR FNdxECM ~~ .WU L/ND PVNNERS ..{~ ~- 0101 CNURtx S1PFR SUIIE IOJ 1 I ` ~ -.~ \ _ WNLIp plfxlOXCA G 91JN1 _ Y. M ,L / _ .~• -B ~C AND -0 QAY R F BLVD ~L ~ _ ~ S'ry®~' '7i.. ~ ^ ` y " TYPICAL STBE6LSEC90E 3 . noN R_p 9OJISN_0 '~' - RP.E( ~"~ _ ' ~~ - l~ 1 TYP CAL 9ECT~ ~ , OF 2 DRA111NCS CONCEPTUAL GR~1G PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO 16100 m TRR crrP oP RANCeo cuc.EroNCA, CONNTY OP SAN BERNARBmO 9iAtR OP CALR+OENU •"° ev.o wsn maiv u°i~s.'°° nortReER 90W ~• w II.9 LGCS rnan w Ems e:e LrnLS nn ] IEIR]IE- Ems ~pP i I, __~. ~I f ~ti I /_ r L~l 'I it e ~1 ._ I._I __ ,_ 1 I ~~ -GOe®_®gV.le ~~ ~ m .., a - OmII.WY __ ~~i~^^~~ i mW x~Tw w~i~ '° s ~.~~~ ®` w~ ~ ` 3=a .,--~-_ DEC 12 2001 PWN3 PREPARED BY 4MOIE k ASSOCNTES INC _ CPVMIbW CMl FNLINEERS 0 VNO PVNNERS „] SOY 10401 LMORCX STRCEi SVIIE 10J a RAMCNO LIK.WONG. G 91 J]0 (909) 9~4-1]11 SECTION R-P - C2 I ~- I ' / i I _ _,- I I I ~ '"~ ~~ I -' ~ ; I I I ~eol°°I. .uN"` _ ___--" ~ -- s-' iE ---=~r-_== ___ _ -- _ ~c -- - nC=~_-~ - -' -c____ -_~c__ _ __._. _ _ ._ L_ _ __ __ i I ~__ _ __ I ( PROPOSED DRAINAGE ALTERNATIVE _\ ,~~_- ~~~~~ - I_ ~ _„ I _ ~ :.~ - - -t_ Il it I ~ V~ ~ __ 4 ~-~E DEBRIS/DETENTION CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16100 2. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRCGPA 00-05 and Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRCENSPA 00-02 3. Description of Project: A residential subdivision of 30 single family lots on 11 5 acres of land in the Low ' ~ Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in i the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located north of Wilson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard - APN. 225-071-66 and 67 • ~~ 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Etiwanda School Distnct 79-160 Citrus Street ~ La Quinta, CA 92253 5. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 6. Zoning: Low (2-4 dwelling units and acres) i 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The subject site is surrounded by vacant land with the exception to the east, where there is a water storage faality The site slopes to the southwest and is undeveloped No urnque physical charactenstics are ewdent on the site The area is dissected by three ~ minor washes that contain slight changes in topography, sod, and vegetation. 'I r -' 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: i City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve ~! Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: ••~I Doug Fenn (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review SUBTT-16100 Etiwanda School Distract Page 2 . DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect. /l~ Signed Doug Fenn Assoaate Planner December 12, 2001 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative • Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (X) Environmental Impact Report for University/Crest Planned Development (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) (Certified June 1991) (X) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Revised University protect (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) (Certified October 26, 1999) I >; ~i I (X) Initial Study/Addendum for Revised Unversity Protect (Certified August 1, 2001) ~A RESOLUTION NO 02-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO SUBTT16100, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 30 SINGLE- FAMILY LOTS ON 11 5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN 225-071-66 AND 67 A Rentals 1 Etiwanda School District filed an application for the approval of Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT16100, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced hearing on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to properly located north of W dson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard and is presently vacant, and b The properties to the north, south, and west of the subtect site are vacant The property is vacant, and also developed with a water storage faality, and c The property has been grubbed; and d The protect falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, and e The proposed design includes a minimum 10,000 square bot lot area 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows X10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-08 SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 9, 2002 Page 2 The proposed project is consistent vtwth the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Cade, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vianity 4 An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 8808291) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master EIR for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further EIR or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master EIR On October 26, 1999, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) because ofa revision to the Development Plan Planned Development In August of 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement. The Addendum identified no substantal changes in the protect that would require a mayor revision to the previous EIR Based upon the facts and information contained in the certified EIR, together wrath all written and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment a There have not been substantial changes in the protect that require major revisions to the previous EIR because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the seventy of the previously identified significant effects b. There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would require mator revisions to the previous EIR because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified significant effects c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the protect will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR, 3) mitigation measures or altematnes previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final EIR, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ~J ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-08 SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 9, 2002 Page 3 Planning Division 1) Intenm debns/detention basin shall be enclosed by decorative metal fenang 2) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice that an intermediate school is planned on the south side of Street "A," in a standard format as approved by the City Planner, pnor to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wntten notice, pnor to accepting a cash deposit on any property, of the existing C C W D reservoir site on the adtoining property to the east The notice shall state that the faality may produce noise, vibration, and glare The notice shall be in a standard format as approved by the City Planner 4) Where slope conddions regwre retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow access onto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner pnor to issuance of grading permits. Enoineenng Division 1) Day Creek Boulevard shall be improved in contunc6on vnth the Rancho Etiwanda (University) Protect Improvements shall be noted in the "Development Agreement for the Revised University Protect" (the "Development Agreement"), the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan ("ENSP"),and the City Standards including curbs and gutters, asphalt pavement, streetlights, access ramps, parkway trails, sidewalks, street trees, traffic signs, stnping, and transitions to existing off-site pavement. a) Day Creek Boulevard, between the southerly and northerly tract boundary, shall be fully improved in accordance with City "Modified Collector Street" (80 to 89-bot R/W) standards North of "A" Street, provide necessary nght-of--way and stnping for 11-foot westerly parkway, 5-foot southbound bike lane, 12-foot southbound lane, 10-foot left tum lane (250 feet long plus 90-foot transition), 12-foot northbound lane, 5-foot northbound bike lane, and a 25-foot easterly parkway trail Total street nght-o~way Hndth of 80-feet • ii) South of "A" Street, provide necessary nght-of--way and stnping for 11-foot westerly parkway, 5-foot southbound bike lane, l2-foot southbound Iane,10-foot painted median, 12-foot northbound lane, northbound 14-foot nghttum lane (300 feet long plus 60-foot transition) including a 5-foot ~' l Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-OS SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 9, 2002 Page 4 northbound bike lane, and a 25-foot easterly parkway trail Total street nght-o~way of 89 feet ni) Prowde Class II Bike Lanes on Day Creek Boulevard as noted above iv) Prowde a 25-foot wide parkway trail on the easterly half of street nght-of--way as noted above v) Prowde R26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs along Day Creek Boulevard frontage and provide additional traffic striping and signage, as required. w) Prowde 35-foot radii curb radii curb returns at the northeast and southeast comers of Day Creek Boulevard and "A" Street b) Day Creek Boulevard, from the southerly tract boundary south to loin existing improvements, shall be improved with a minimum of 36 feet of pavement only, for one lane of traffic in each direction and pedestnans c) Parkway improvements shall confirm to ENSP and Day Creek Boulevard Beautification Master Plan, including a 25-foot wide parkway trail Slopes in public maintenance areas shall be 3.1 maximum 2) "A" Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Modified Collector Residential" (66 to 72-foot R/W) including a) Full street improvements, curb, gutters, sidewalks, and installation of 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights b) Parkway improvements west of "B" Street shall conform to public maintenance cnteria, including 3.1 maximum slopes and 30-inch maxmum retaining walls c) Between Day Creek Boulevard and the first proposed school dnveway, prowde necessary nghtof-way and stnpmg for 11-foot southerly parkway, eastbound 14-foot right turn lane, 12-foot eastbound lane, westbound 10-foot left turn lane, westbound 14- foot right turn lane, and an 11-foot northerly parkway. Total street right-of-way of 72 feet d) From the first proposed school dnveway easterly along "A"Street, provide necessary right-of--way and stnpmg for 11-foot southerly parkway, 5-foot eastbound bike lane, l2-foot eastbound Iane,10- foot two way left turn lane, 12-foot westbound lane, 5-foot westbound bike lane, and an 11-foot northerly parkway. Total street nght-of--way of 66 feet r1 U S~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-08 SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 9, 2002 Page 5 3) Other local streets frontage improvements to be in accordance with Gty "Local Residential" (60-foot R/W) improvements including curb and gutters, sidewalks, driveways, and installation of 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights 4) If this map records prior to Tract 15982, provide a secondary access road to Day Creek Boulevard 5) Driveways on corner lots on "B," "C,"and "D" Streets shall be located the maximum distance allowed by the lot size from the intersection BCR, to minimize conflicts between vehicles approaching or fuming right and those backing out of driveways 6) Storm drains in Day Creek Boulevard including the on-site debris/detention basin shall be constructed and operational prior to occupancy "Off-sites by others" shall be bonded for prior to building permits for this tract 7) The City wdl establish a traffidarculation improvement fee for the general surrounding development area This development wdl be requred to participate in the fair share cost distribution for the traffidarculation improvements 8) A final drainage report is required for all storm drains, the north property line protection faalityand the stung of the basin to include the ultimate developed condition and flows from the surrounding drainage areas (Southern California Edison property and Tentative Tract 15982) thatwdl remain afterthe development of the Rancho Etiwanda Estates Protect to the north Some ofthe drainage study issues that must be addressed are as follows a) The design/sung of the pipe connecting flows to the proposed debris/detention basin b) Information on the effects of the increased undeveloped flows and potential debris from Tract 16100 for the design, hydraulics and bulked O100's for the proposed lines and basin c) The availability of land area within the school district parcel for the construction of the "ultimate" basin to accommodate anticipated debris/flows from the ultimate developed surrounding areas (SCE propertyand Tentative Tract 15982) as noted above d) The drainage report shall reflect that this protect shall be in compliance with the City adopted Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Policy e) In addition to hydrology and hydraulics for storm drains, the final drainage report shall address the need to provide flood protection from off-site flows with gutters, drains, walls and/or other `~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-08 SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 9, 2002 Page 6 measures at the northerly tract boundary Off-site flows diverted by said faalities shall not adversely affect adtacent or downstream properties 9) Construct the intenm debns/detention basin as follows, justified by a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer a) Prowde an ultimate design for the basin to serve the entire developed condition of the surrounding drainage areas b) On the final map provide an offer to dedicate and easement for the portion of the School Distnct property containing the intenm debns/detention basin and an easement for access by maintenance vehicles to the basin c) An assessment distnct shall be formed for maintenance of the debns/detention basin or a maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney The maintenance agreement shall guarantee the pnvate maintenance of the faality, but shall provde the City with the nght of access to maintain the faality if said pnvate maintenance is insufficient The agreement shall authonze the City to assess all resulting maintenance costs to the developer Said agreement shall be recorded to run wth the property 10) Prowde a Drainage Acceptance Agreement (temporary) for public waters flowing from "D" Street to the basin 11) Drainage acceptance, construction, or encroachment agreements are required and shall be obtained from the property owners of the offsite storm dram facilities and/or holders of easements that this protect is planning to use for its drainage flows prior to the issuance of construction permits 12) All offsite improvements shown on the grading plan sections require that nghts of entry be obtained from the adjacent property owners pnor to final map approval or issuance of any building permits whichever occurs first 13) The asphalt nght turn lane on Day Creek Boulevard south of "A" Street should slope toward the curb, consistent with Section B-B of Standard Dravnng 119 Environmental Mitigation 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master EIR for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the EIR and Supplemental EIR, as certified by the County SAS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-08 SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT • January 9, 2002 Page 6 9) Construct the intenm debns/detention basin as follows, tustified by a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer a) Provide an ultimate design for the basin to serve the entire developed condition of the surrounding drainage areas b) On the final map provide an offer to dedicate and easement for the portion of the School Distract property containing the intenm debns/detention basin and an easement for access by maintenance vehicles to the basin c) An assessment distract shall be formed for maintenance of the debns/detention basin or a maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney The maintenance agreement shall guarantee the pnvate maintenance of the facility, but shall provide the City with the nght of access to maintain the faality if said private maintenance is insuffiaent The agreement shall authonze the City to assess all resulting maintenance costs to the developer Said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property • 10) Provide a Drainage Acceptance Agreement (temporary) for public waters flowing from "D" Street to the basin 11) Drainage acceptance, construction, or encroachment agreements are regwred and shall be obtained from the property owners of the offsite storm dram faalities and/or holders of easements that this project is planning to use for its drainage flows pnor to the issuance of construction permits 12) All offsite improvements shown on the grading plan sections require that nghts of entry be obtained from the adtacent property owners pnor to final map approval or issuance of any bwlding permits whichever occurs first 13) The asphalt nght turn lane on Day Creek Boulevard south of "A"Street should slope toward the curb, consistent with Section B-B of Standard Drawing 119 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the approved Mitigated Negative Declaration as certified by the City Council and the Mitigation Monitonng Program adopted by City „Council Resolution No 01-177, attached hereto • 6 The Secretaryrto-ttSi~, CommissyQn shall certify a adoption of \ ~ ~ / APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 -~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-08 • SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 9, 2002 Page 7 of San Bernardino And Initial Study/Addendum as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga BY 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary • I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS r~ NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~Lp ~, . , _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~;~ DEPARTMENT ~1TANDARD CONDITIONS I~I f'120JECT#: SUBTT16100 I :%UBJECT: 30 Lot Subdiwsion pPLICANT: EUwanda School Distnct I :f)CATION: East side of Day Creek Boulevard and north of Wilson ~,LL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. f I ~'PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR 'I)MPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~ General Requirements ~ 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The Cdy may, at its sole i discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition ~ 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditons, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check E ~ Time Limits y ~ 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning i Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the i date of the approval I C•r Site Development ,1 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ' submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permds ~~~ 'I •I S~' 11-01 S~~ Comolelion Date -~-~- -~-~- ~-~- -~-~ Protect NoSUBTT16100 Comolehon Date ~ 2 All site, grading, landscape, ;rr;gation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ ; cons;stency pr;or to issuance of any permits (such as grad;ng, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval ;n the case of a custom lot subdw;s;on, or approved I use has commenced, wh;chever comes first ~ 3 Approval of th;s request shall not wave compliance with all sections of the Development Code, _/_/_ all other applicable City Ord;nances, and appl;cable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the tame of bu;ld;ng perm;t ;ssuance ~ 4 All ground-mounted utii;ty appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be _/_/_ I located out of publ;c view and adequately screened through the use of a combinat;on of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the sat;sfact;on of the City Planner For s;ngle family residential developments, transformers shalt be placed ;n underground vaults ~ 5 Street names shall be submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval ;n accordance with the _/_/_ ~ adopted Street Nam;ng Policy pnor to approval of the final map 6 The Covenants, Cond;t;ons, and Restrict;ons (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporat;on of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Associat;on are subtect to the approval of the Plann;ng and Engmeenng Dwisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Frnal Map or pnor to the ;ssuance of bwlding perm;ts, wh;chever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the ` C;ty Eng;neer The Homeowners' Assoaat;on shall submit to the Plann;ng Divis;on a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever ,~ sa;d informat;on changes 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently ma;nta;ned by the property _/_/_ ~ owner, homeowners' associat;on, or other means acceptable to the Ctty Proof of th;s landscape ma;ntenance shall be subm;tted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pr;or to ~ the ssuance of bwldmg perm;ts 8 The developer shall submit a construct;on access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/ ' lots for City Planner and City Eng;neer approval, ;ncluding, but not I;mited to, public not;ce I regwrements, spec;al street posting, phone I;st;ng for commun;ty concerns, hours of construction actmty, dust control measures, and secur;ty fencing 9 Six-foot decorative block fence/walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double _/_/_ i wall cond;t;on would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoin;ng f property owners to provide a s;ngle wall Developer shall notify, by marl, all cont;guous property I owner at least 30 days pr;or to the removal of any ex;st;ng walls/ fences along the project's ~ penmeter D iLandscaping '1 A detailed landscape and ;rr;gation plan, includ;ng slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ I the case of res;dent;al development, shall be prepared by a I;censed landscape arch;tect and subm;tted for Ctty Planner review and approval pnor to the ;ssuance of bu;ld;ng perm;ts or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdw;s;on ~? All pr;vate slopes of 5 feet or more ;n vert;cal height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ ' slope, shall be, at m;n;mum, ;rr;gated and landscaped with appropr;ate ground cover for erosion control Slope plant;ng required by this section shall include a permanent vrigat;on system to be ;nstalled by the developer pr;or to occupancy ~ All private slopes ;n excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vert;cal he;ght and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and ;rr;gated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as j follows one 15-gallon or larger s;ze tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger s;ze •, shrub per each 100 sq tt of slope area, and appropr;ate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vert;cal he;ght and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger s;ze tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted ;n sc~;,-o, 2 S"l8 Protect NoSUBTT16100 Comolehon Date staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall • include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 7 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shat) be coordinated with the Engineering Division 8 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code E. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property • 2 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory perforinance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mad boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mad boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map • Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-11-01 3 ~~~ Prot ect NoSUBTT16100 Completion Date 2 Dedication shall be made of the following nghts-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from I / street centerline) - _ - Varies total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard _/ / 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards / / 4 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the Clty for the following streets, except for / / approved openings Day Creek Boulevard _ 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the / / final map -- - 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 / / feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adtacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, _ _ _ a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided H. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other Da Creek Boulevard X X X X X X e X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item _ (e) Parkway Tratl/LandscaDmo 3 Improvement Plans and Construction • a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights _/_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior tD final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _/_/ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer / / SC-11-01 4 J Prgecl NoSUBTT16100 Comolehon Date d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / / protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and _ _ _ interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engtneer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the Ctty Engtneer f Existing Ctty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots _ _ _ h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program _ _ _ 5 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for confornance with / / adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all protect _ _ _ intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commeraal or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required 1. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall / / be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance _ _ _ of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shalt be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Day Creek Boulevard Parkway/Trail, north side of "A" Street west of "B" Street 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or / / other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces _ _ _ 3 A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding _ _ _ permits whichever occurs first Forrnation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All requred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_/_ developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / / Beautification Master Plan Day Creek Boulevard _ _ _ SC-11-01 5 ~2\ Protect NoSUBTT16100 Comoletion Date J. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/ approval or the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engtneer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk K. Utilities t Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as requred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardtno A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits to the case of all other residential protects L. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed _/_/_ beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engtneer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-11-01 6 ~2-L_ Fire Distract Condmons . • Page 1 of 5 . '.Y4-. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT i ~° - FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-00-0300-A PROJECT #: SUBTT16100 DATE: July 16, 2001 PLAN TYPE: 30 SFR Etlwanda School Dlstrlct LOCATION: East Slde of Day Creek Blvd North of Wilson FD REVIEW BY Steve Locatl, Flre Protectlon Plannlng Speaahst PLANNER: Sal Salazar ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR • COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire District requrements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire Distract requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review Prwr to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed A. Communty Facddies Distracts 1 This protect is subtect to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Pnor to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Prior to the issuance of any bulding permd, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Fire flow requirements for this protect shall be 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Droision Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- S23 Fire Dtstnct Condmons • • Page 2 oC5 5 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Ftre Constructior Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Firf Safety Division 6 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plar submitted for review and approval Include main size Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans speafications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 8 Prior to the tssuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Re/lecbve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avatlabd~ty for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If suffiaent water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be regwred to each structure affected by the insuffictent Flow D. Automatic Ftre Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the building(s) 2 Any modification or remodel to a fire sprinkler system requires Fire District approval, and a permit NO WORK is permitted without a permit issued by Fire Construction Services 3 All structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Seaton E Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 4 Requtred Note All commerctal, industrial, public assembly, educational and multi-family residential buildings constructed in the High Fire Hazard wildland interface areas -Very High Fire Hazard Seventy Zone (VHFHSZ), State Responsibility Area (SRA), and other areas within the Hazardous Fire Area, shall be provided with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 5 Requtred Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commerctal structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-faintly residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire Dtstnct access requtrements (Section E. Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Ftre Dtstnct 6 Prior to the tssuance of a bulding permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire sprinkler system Fire Construction Services for rewew and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 7 Prior to the tssuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 8 The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies E. Fire Access 1 Residential Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tracUparcel map, the applicant shall obtain sty Completion I}atc -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/_/ I -/-/. -//- -/_/. -/-/- /-/- -/-/- -/-/- Fire Distnct Condmons • • Complenon Dale • Page 3 of 5 approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 2 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and / / obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or prroate, from the Fire District in _ _ _ consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise regwred Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications In fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 3 The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The / / minimum inside turn radds is 20 feet The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet The minimum _ _ radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 4 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's / / approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fve District access roadways/driveways _ _ _ 5 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a _/_/ minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and _ clear of any obstructons at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 6 Provide secondary egress/access in accordance with Fire District standards. Dead-end / / roadways shall not exceed 600 feet in length. Residential automatic fire sprinkler systems are _ _ _ required in all structures to mitigate access. 7 Amend site access to accommodate Fire DisVict emergency vehicle access _/_/_ 8 Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from _/_/ the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The _ plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 9 Prior to the issuance of any Cert~cate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance _/_/_ with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes 10 New residential buildings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting _/_/_ background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bulding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry F. Hazard Notification -Fire (State Law) 1 Protects located in the State Responsibility Areas (SRA), or the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone /_/_ (VHFHSZ) are within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District State Law regwres notification to be made Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map, the subdivider shall place a note on the map stating the protect is located within the State Responsibility Area or the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, as appropriate, due to wildland exposure The note is subtect to the approval of the Fire District and is based on SRANHFHSZ maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 2 Hazardous Fire Area Development Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall _/_/_ meet all requirements for development and construction within the Hillside District, the Very High Fire SZS fire Distract Condrtons • • Page 4 of 5 Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ), and the State Responsibility Area (SRA) This may include increased street widths, on-site water supplies, fire-resistive construction, Class A roof assemblies, fire sprinklers, etc ,contained in the Fire Safety Overlay District Standards G. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for Ali Maps and Plans) 1 This protect is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" based on proximity to or exposure urban - wildland interface Mitigation measures are regwred The building(s) shall meet the construction standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay District, Area FR-1 or Area FR-2 2 Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire Distract approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program 3 Prior to the issuance of any precise grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures by vegetation 4 Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit or Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall have completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the pro/ect area Approval is subject to final on-site inspection 5 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan shall be installed The Fire District shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modification areas Further, the installed fuel modification plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fue District The CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subtect to (annual) triennial inspections 6 Phased protects or temporary fuel modification plans must meet the regwrements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire DisVict H. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Pnor to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times I. Architectural Budding Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Cali the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal .1. Fire District Fees Due 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be Complenon Date /_/_ -/-/ -/-/- -/- -/-/- -/-/- -//- ~l Zl~ ' Ftre Dtstnct Condthons • Page 5 of 5 assessed upon separate submittals of plans K. Plan Submittal Required Notice • Completion Dale 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fue, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer L. Other RequirementslComments 1 NOTE Prior to Planning Division approval the applicant must contact the Fire District to resolve comments and/or conditions Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SI 4/2001 • -/-/. / / ~Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO Clerk of the Board FROM City of Rancho Cucamonga Counly of San Bernardino Planning Division 385 N Arrowhead, 2nd Floor P O Box 807 San Bernardino, CA 92415-0130 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Documentary Handling Fee ($35 00) Receipt Number SUBJECT Fling of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code PROJECT DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16100 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A residential subdmsion of 30 single family lots on 11 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Related files General Plan Amendment DRCGPA 00-05 and Et~wanda North Speafic Plan Amendment DRCENSPA 00-02 PROJECT LOCATION Located north of Wilson Avenue on the east side of the northerly prolongation of Day Creek Boulevard - APN 225-071-66 and 67 APPLICANT (Name /Address & Phone) Etiwanda School Distnct 79-160 Citrus Street, La Qwnta, CA 92253 (909) 899-2451 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER N/A This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the above-described project on January 9, 2002, with an effective date of January 22, 2002, and has made the following determinations regarding the above protect 1 The protect _ will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment 2 _ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this protect pursuant to the provisions of CEQA This protect is within the scope of the following Initial Study/Addendum for Revised University Protect (Certified August 1, 2001) X A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this protect pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and was adopted by the City Counal by way of Resolution #01-177 on August 1, 2001 The discretionary action covered by this Notice is consistent with the protect evaluation 3 Mitigation measures X were, _ were not, made a condition of the approval of this protect 4 A statement of ovemding considerations _ was, X was not, adopted for this protect 5 Findings X were, _ were not, made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA This is to certify that the final EIR or Negative Declaration and record of protect approval is available to the General Public at City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. • January 9, 2002 City Planner (909) 477-2750 (Signature) (Date) (Title) (Telephone) ~~ ~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONCA Staff Report DATE• January 9, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Warren Morellon, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-48 - CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT -The development of a recreational vehicle (RV) and self-storage faculty consisting of 166,784 square feet • on 12 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located in the Southem California Edison power line corridor adfacent to the Day Creek Channel, north of 4th Street APN 229-321-OS and 09 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surroundino Land Use and Zonlno North - Southern Callforma Edlson Utility Corridor, General Industrial (Subarea 14) South - Southern Callforma Edlson Utility Corridor, City of Ontario East - San Bemardlno County Flood Control Channel West - IndustrialNacant Land, General Industrial (Subarea 14) B General Plan Designations Protect Slte -Southem Callfomla Edlson Utility Comdor North - Southem Callfomla Edlson Utility Corridor South - City of Ontario East - San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel West - General Industrial (Subarea 14) C Site Characteristics The site is a Southern Callforma Edlson (SCE) power line comdor, which contains three SCE utilitytransmission towers There are no trees, rock outcroppings, or other significant natural features The land is relatively flat, sloping north to south The site is casually prominent from the adtoining I-15 Freev~ay on-and off-ramps • ANALYSIS A General The applicant is proposing to build a RV and self-storage facility The site will be developed in three phases The first phase will front on 4th Street and extend north ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCCUP00-48 - CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT January 9, 2002 Page 2 approximately 840 linear feet This phase will include 75,094 square feet of storage budding area and a 954 square foot office/caretaker's residence Phase 2 will be constructed on the north side of Phase 1, which will extend the protect an additional 600 feet to the north Phase 2 will include 68,930 square feet of storage budding area Phase 3 will also extend the storage faality north Phase 3 wll include 22,784 square feet of storage budding area The first phase of the protect wtll be made of painted tilt-up concrete The second and third phases will be made of a material to mimic the appearance of painted tilt-up concrete The protect will have a sandblasted treatment on the office/caretaker's residence and on buildings and walls along the perimeter of the facility The office/caretaker's residence will include spandrel glass in its design. The spandrel glass will also be used on another budding that fronts on 4th Street The design of the facility will allow all storage areas to be screened from both 4th Street and the I-15 Freeway to the west The site will be developed in accordance with Industrial District (Subarea 14) development standards. The protect also falls under the 4th Street Beautification Master Plan and will be developed in accordance with its regwrements The utility lines (less than 66kV) that run along 4th Street are regwred to be undergrounded as a result of the proposed development There will be 5 to 6 foot and 1-foot landscape planters along the west and east sides of the project, respectively The protect will have a 24-hour office%aretaker's residence on-site The residence will encompass the second floor of the office building and include atwo-car garage • B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (Mannenno, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project on July 17, 2001. The Committee directed the applicant to work wrath staff to revise the protect to be more consistent with the City's industrial design standards and with surrounding industrial development The Committee also recommend the protect be designed around a theme (Exhibit "L") The applicant revised the project and it was again reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Mannenno, Stewart, Fong) on November 20, 2001 The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to staffs comments (Exhibit "M") C. Technical Review Committee The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. D Environmental Assessment The applicant prepared Part I of the Initial Study Staff completed Part II and determined that the protect could have a sigrnficant adverse environmental impact onshort-term air qualitydunng site grading The mitigations listed in the Initial Study Part II and attached Resolution of Approval will reduce the short-term impact to less than sigrnficant A habitat assessment of the site has determined that the site may be swtable habitat for the federally endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSFLF) As a result, a protocol survey was conducted by Forensic Entomology Services (October6, 2001) for the site The survey concluded that no adult flies were encountered during the study CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a . 300-foot radius of the protect site KZ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCCUP00-48 - CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT January 9, 2002 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Iler City Planner BB WM\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" -Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan Exhibit "C" - I-15 Freeway Line-of-Sight Exhibit "D" -Office/Caretaker's Residence Elevations Exhibit "E" -Office/Caretaker's Residence Floor Plans Exhibit "F" - 4th Street Storage FaclityElevation Exhibit "G" -Storage Faality Elevations Exhibit "H" -Plaster Detail . Exhibit "I" -Typical Intenor Storage Buldmg Elevation/Floor Plan Exhibit "J" -Landscape Plan Exhibit "K" -Grading Plan Exhibit "L" -July 17, 2001, Design ReHew Committee Action Agenda Exhibit "M" -November 20, 2001, Design ReHew Committee Action Agenda Exhibit "N" -Initial Study Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP00-48 ~~ ~'~ PN wI ~~~ MO NOIl~/21111l1 3118 w>.we r.r.~w~~ ~ .... ._...... _ ONItl38//101G 031.OY s ~I i ~I I {]; .._ d i a 7 O E N J r 7 W H n Exhibit "A" . ~~~ \~~ w .~.~... ,............~~ NM7d 3118 ONIMM3~NNIWB 731'JY tie • i I' ~1 ~~ k =wg. s geg~ :~~~~~ g~~~~ 3 @~_~ sg~~~§§ ~~ ~~e ~p9rvP89~g ~~~~ ~~6a~~~~ ~ z a J 0 _._..__- ~.;aas z r Exhibit "B" „1 ~ =~ - ,~ . ~ . ,~ ~~;-. ` 'r ~ ~ \ K~ ~ t ~~ ~- C~ ~E`d dd i~~id ec ~~ s~ ol~d~~l ~~ g~~: °~~~~~ t I~~~~~~~a~; Exhi ~.~....~...e .~,.:.e._ ~~~~ o~ w e.~.., t "' ~, ~3 ~~ F ii .ten ~1f ~ jj I ~ ~ ~ F ~_ _~~ 1 aw'~t ~ O iJ yr NF, 0 $} ~. 1~ bit "C" ~~ 8NOI1V/~313 II w.~ewr ~s Sao rme~.e m~mw llN~l 8L30VNVW Df'UI~'~~Ca J31JY C ~s~ "I I I ~-~ i+- ~-- 0~ I i F a o ~ x w w ~' G z~ 0 e F P i SJ l p' ~_ F Exhibit "D" ~~ c ~ y ~ / ~ f v VS yq ~^ ] i ~ I - i : ' ~ t 3 ~" - - ~- z F ~ 0~~ 0 DD[ o ~~[ ~~o~ z 0 a w W 3 \ . ..... , ,. ; ;~ SNV'ld a007d ..ier r~mw lIN1'1 Sa3O`INVW ~HI,Y .~ 0 0 ` ~ i _ ~ ~ ~~ F r a S S ,~ .e, r~A L~ ~ wsi .ql~ .q~ i _ l ~ L J e ~ o ) E ~ ~ Q O~ A o0. qa 3 r. Exhibit "E" K~ ~~bW w~ ~ rr MO wfnp e 1 ON11mNlgl3 D31JV w I Y • t L_J Exhibit "F" u J w~ W F m m a a H a a Exhibit "G" r ~~ Iyy133Ll18 H1Y II K ~0 r'~MNm ~wfw Ptl wow rt'iwq I~w1 N1p1 ~1 OMN33NIdl3 031'Jv 7 I~ S~ F 3 I} f I~ p II` Q N yI Z I' ~ ~~ a ~g o I~ W I 3 4 n i 1 i it ~ i W z z U W W C U I Q .. 0 11 ~~ t `f 4 1, 1~ S~ II L ~ i , III ~~ ta3al.s PalY I II I 1 .I YI ~I ,~~ i-' .~ _xhil~it "H" ti..~ me n. ~..~ ~w i11Y13O 9~M3! ~_ p ••s~•e ••••• w •~v .w 01/IV3iltld13 031AY ~i x~~ 0 V W h O W J W a ~ ftd 6 r ] ~ ~ }~ ~ a ~ ~~ L"I. 7~ Z }~~r~1~( I.1 0 4 3 .v~MOr ~:sae smvvo ~ma FN~~Dt~ ~dIWY ~ W O s JZ 1 °~ 0 i 6 W W O M M d OC O O J W Exhibit "I" ~~~~ ~.~Z ..r.. ;!aluX3 Y®~~ d~Pm.Y M ~Y~ ~ONM S i r i 7• T `r3 eT F4 e~.i • ~! o s! -- I ;j_ ~J~ __ ~ ~_ ____ R}{v/y`~ ~e _~F ~ pY A err ww- Z E -w j3 • t t~ r • ®p 3 ~ ~-l~r ~~~f y ;~ [nrlosc.%Pe qua ~ w,b, ..)1.. !9!4X3 ----- p ~~:~ t I sh _ T ~ o-.1,---=~ 3 t s i€ I 1 ~~~~ II Fit s~`• .~) J. @eh .~~~~ ?/ ~~ I \. 6 ~ ~ e ~ ~( J E .~ o~ ~~ ` •~ i ~. L zit ~\ Yi ~ ~ ~~ ~ /~ ~~ S , ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` I ~ ° 0 ~ ~ \ I ~_ 1 rF ~ 1 g f ~a.>..- f/ f~ I x ~ - ~ I ~ 1. _ 3 ~ ~ i 1 _ p ~_ \ J~ tf ii • 1 s ;; ~~ Y _ . ~, ~ f _ . ~y ~ ~~ ~ s s I ~ i f. .~ •. ~f F ~ F \` ~ ~ r ^\ v ~'t}~~ .F ' - ~1]/ '-- zsoar ~" ~ o Flo ~ -- ~ ~t~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ,~ ~ $ . - - -~~ u n9ETls' NL - . 4TH STREET nu.u. n r r pRAO1N0 PLAN ACfEC ENOINEERIfq ~ ~~• •~ ~~ a.•L °. •.n~rY PMABE 1 T9 .•Yr u Iru1.YS. C~ e.a .. ~.~.~e.a .aw mi e .w ~ ~ i !! i 18HM / JS~/3 rmv~s a~~mw ~i.i w ~~ ~ ~ amOtatft N011035 ONi O`ILf ' ~ Q 'fig ~ r ~~ u y:. tl __ e ~ ~ ~ 9 i ~ ~, e ~ ~ ~ i 7 ~ ;/ ~ I ~ I - ~l 1 ~ 4 i ~ • / i ' ~ ~ I ~' ~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~: ~~ v n, 1 i ~`1~ 1i z 1,~ ~ 3 Z i ; ~i ~ a ~ c ~• ~ a ~t i 1YI ~ i ~I i I I~@. ~~ I i i i' ~ ~ ' 4~ ;~~ ~ `~ ~ ~' ~~ \ 3N/7 Al!l3dOLd R~mn ~~~' .Para ~.m OOO i~0~ ~..V f Y ~rJ . ~ u.. ..nu.. .. 9N01103s .. ........ ' :: C Q i ~. • J `~ W ~ ..Kr pMp ~ ~F e%.~ I~ ~~ ~p "a~ J~ r Ja ~ , r ~ e ~ ~~ «¢ v C ~ ~ ~ ^ eN N ~ ~ • , E 1 i ~ a\ Al o ~ 'I II E ~ 1 JI W ~)I~ I' ~V1I 1 J W ~~ ,I ,~ ;; i ., BNOII~J3S e~~ rwmw d. 2 HNIl2/H1N30 8/N Q y Flu v+- ~a ~$ ~ "a J^ J^ -fFJ yy ~ _y4~~~ .N~• S_ _.~• S LL '~ 1 S~ -Lw¢ I a g~ ~i 1 A g 4 pN n N //// ~ II ~ r +• I ~ ~ s~ ~9~ - i 1~ ~ j I ~ N i ~1 ~ ~ 1 ,/ ~ I~ I ~ ~ I - i i ~ i I ,~ - G~ I' ~I I ~~ ~ ~ I I i 1 I ~~~ - I I I I j i i I I ' 1 ~ i I ~ ~1 I ~ i I I ~ ~ ~~ I I - 1 I #? ~ I ~ - I ~ j • ~ 1 I I _ ~~ 1 I ~1 _ I ~ P I ~ ~ E ~% - ,~~ BNOIta3s .~..e., w~..n rya se ~~m~ _~~~ ~ 3N11 /11L9d02ld oer~~ i 0 is®11 uo .a u~.w u 183M u m.uu ~ .e~ on.m j e 7 C : Q ' 1 U ~~ Jr_ ~s menus wt, ~~ !1 I', 1 ~I ~/ I 1 I ~ 1 ~I a_ ~~ €. R "' u~ N W WN L >J KF W W~ i DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6.10 p m Warren Morelion July 17, 2001 uvi ral vac, cram ynyyVl vv-~u-~+IIU.IIIICIU/CYCIVUIIICIII- The development of a recreational vehicle (RV) and self storage facility consisting of 166,784 square feet of budding area on 12 acres of land in the General Industrial Distract (Subarea 14), located in the Southem California Edison power Ime comdor east of the I-15 Freeway, north of 4th Street - APN. 229-321-08 & 9. Desicn Parameters: The 12-acre project site is located within a portion of a Southem California Edison comdor The site contains three large utility transmission towers The site is bordered on the west by vacant land and one industrial budding. To the east of the site is the Day Creek Channel Bordering the site to the north is another portion of the Edison comdor that extends north. To the south of the site is the City of Ontario. The applicant is proposing to build a R V and self-storage facility The site v~nll be developed in three phases The first phase will front 4th Street and extend north approximately 840 linear feet This phase will include 75,094 square feet of storage budding area and a 954 square foot office/caretakers residence. Phase two well be constructed on the north side of Phase one, wMch will extend the protect an additional 600 linear feet to the north. Phase two will include 68,930 square feet of storage building area Phase three will also extend to the storage facility north. This Phase well include 22,784 square feet of storage building area Upon completion, the facility will be 1,725 linear feet m length and total 165,830 square feet of storage area Located m a General Industrial Distract, the proposed fatality is designed to look like industrial development. The building and screen walls have a smooth tilt-up appearance, though they are prefabricated polymer cement panels that are stuccoed If approved, this protect Hell be the first of its kind m the City with this type of construction material. The office/caretakers residence well inGude glass panels m its design The glass panels will also be used on another building that front's 4th Street. The screen walls proposed will have to be revised so that they totally screen storage areas from 4th Street and the I-15 Freeway to the west. The site will be developed in accordance with Industrial Distract (Subarea 13) development standards. The project also falls under the 4th Street Beautification Master Plan and will be developed to accordance wrath its requirements The utility lines that run along 4th Street are required to be undergrounded as a result of the proposed development The protect vwll have a one-foot landscape planter along the east property Ime. There will be also be 5 and 6 foot landscape planters along areas of the west side of the project The protect wd- have a 24-hour office/caretakers residence on-site The residence will encompass the second floor of the office building and include atwo-car garage. Staff Comments• The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues' The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 Although the protect is designed with an industrial theme, it should be revised to be more consistent with the City's current Commertaal/Industrial Design Gwdelmes, and it should be more complementary with surrounding industrial development. In particular, the office/manager's residence is stark and boxy For example, the Commeroial/Industrial Guidelines rogwres that the pro/ect be designed with a minimum of two primary bwldmg materials, such as concrete, textured concrete, sand blasted concrete, brick, grarnte, or similar materials Spandrel glass is not considered a primary material The polymer cement Exhibit ~~L~~ material proposed for construction maybe used, provided the applicant show staff and the K7 O • DRC COMMENTS CUP DRCCUP00-48 - CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT July 17, 2001 Page 2 Design Review Committee that the matenal can mimic the smooth look of industrial tilt-up development However, as mentioned above, a minimum of one more second primary building matenal will still be needed to be added to the project's final design The protect should also avoid large expanses of blank walls, devoid of any architecture or embellishment by incorporating materials and architectural treatments similar to those used on the building being bwlt to the project's east. The budding to the east has, as part of its architectural design, a main entry and two building comers fronting 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenue that have tower elements and walls that have a combination of sandblasting, spandrel glass, limestone accents, and different colored paint to give the building more articulation. The warehouse potion of the building is not as embellished with architectural treatments as the main entry and budding comers, nevertheless, many of the same materials are used on it giwng the project a 360-degree architectural design. Attached are a Site Plan and Elevations of the budding to the east. 2. The screen wall along 4th Street, and extended back 200 feet from 4th Street, should be revised for a decorative appearance. A survey of other public storage facilities in town indicates use of enhanced materials, such as sandblasted concrete, split face and fluted block, and other decorative elements, such as pilasters, and metal trellis accents. 3. The screen wall along 4th Street vnll need to be extended in height to fully screen interior • storage buildings from public wew. The screen wall should be designed with berrning along its base to limit its height to a maximum of 8 feet, as seen from 4th Street. The wallas seen from inside the protect can be above 8 feet. Secondary Issues• Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time penrntting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues To create a more cohesive 4th Street landscape design between Santa Anita Avenue and the I-15 Freeway, the applicant should match the landscape design proposed for the budding currently being built to the profect's east side The landscape design should match both in design and matenal See attached example of landscaping. Add additional trees and plant matenal to the landscape planters along the west side of protect 3 Depending on what will be parked in the outdoor storage parking stalls, the screen walls adtacent to them may have to be extended in height. Per City regwremenTs, all vehiGe storage areas shall be fully screened from public view To extend the screen wall height above the maximum height allowed in the district of 8 feet, approval of a variance by the Planrnng Commission is necessary. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be revised subject to the above-mentioned conditions and brought back before the Committee for further review ~~~ DRC COMMENTS CUP DRCCUP00-48-CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT July 17, 2001 Page 3 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Pam Stewart, John Mannenno, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Warren Morelion The Committee reviewed the protect and did not recommend approval. The Committee directed the applicant to work with staff to address the above-mentioned design issues Specifically, the Committee asked that the applicant revise the proiect's architecture to be more consistent Hnth the current industnal design standards. The Committee also asked that the project be designed around a theme. The Committee was open to construction matenal, type, provided the matenals could meet all bwlding and design standards The applicant agreed to revise the proiect's architectural design The Committee asked that the project come back for further review. r1 U r 1 L~ ~2Z. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 10:00 a.m Warren Morelion November 20, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP 00-48 - CRITCHFIELDDEVELOPMENT -The development of a recreational vehicle (RV) and self storage faality consisting of 166,784 square feet of building area on 12 acres of land in the General Idustnal Distnct (Subarea 14), located m the Southern California Edison power Ime comdor eastof 115 Freeway, north of 4th Street - APN: 229-321-08 and 9 Background; On July 17, 2001, the Design Review Committee reviewed the project and recommended the applicant work with staff to resolve design issues presented at the meeting. Specifically, the Committee asked the applicant to revise the projecPs archdecture by designing it around a theme that would match existing industnal development m the area. The Committee also felt that the projects location on 4th Street is a gateway into the City and should be designed accordingly The Committee was open to construction matenal type, provided the matenals could meet the City's building and architectural standards. Desion Parameters• The applipnt has revised and submitted a new architectural design that is consistent with the City's design guidelines and with industnal development in the area. The primary matenal used for the protect is tilt-up concrete with sandblasted treatments, similar to the new building (Bendetti warehouse building) lust east of the protect site. The tilt-up concrete is proposed for the first phase on the west, south, and portions of the east sides of the project Because of the . highcost oftilt-up concrete, the applicant has proposed to use a different construction material that can mimic tit-up concrete on the second and third phases, and on areas of the first phase that are not visible to the public The projecPs layout will not change from the original proposal at the July 17, 2001, Design Review Committee meeting. Staff Comments• The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues The following broad design issues vnll be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect: The applicant has worked with staff to resolve all major design issues. Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues The 8-foot screen wall proposed along 4th Street wll need to be raised to fully screen mtenor storage buddmgs from public view. To do so, the screen wall should be designed with bermmg at ds base to extend the total screening height above 8 feet The wall as seen from inside the protect can be above 8 feet without bennmg. To allow room for benning m front of the screen wall next to the office/caretakers residence a landscape planter will need to be added (see attached). 2 Depending on what v~nll be parked m the outdoor storage parking stalls, the screen walls adjacent to them along the freeway side of the protect may have to be extended in height. Per City standards, all vehicle storage areas shall be screened from public view. Additional landscaping to help screen parking area may be used as an option to extending the wall height 3 Add reveals to all sandblasted column treatments to be consistent with the architectural design of the office/caretakers residence and screen wall plasters Exhibit "M" l~'L3 DRC COMMENTS DRCCUP00~8 - CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT November 20, 2001 Page 2 4 Add sandblasted column Vestments to each side of the spandrel glass that is on the storage budding at the southwest comer of the site Also add a column treatment on the south side of the second floor bathroom of the office/caretakers residence. Add a horizontal sandblasted band under the second floor bedroom window on the east side of the office/caretakers residence Extend the spandrel glass up to the bottom of the existing honzontal sandblasted treatment at the roofline. 6 Add plasters at all intenor comers and ending points of the screen wall along 4th Street (see attached) 7. Because there is no logical ending point to end the spandrel glass, wrap the glass all the way around the front entry doors of the office/caretakers residence. Policy Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design vnthout discussion: Add perforated sheet metal to wrought iron gates for screening purposes Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee give the applicant a final architectural design direction for the project and recommends the protect be brought back to the Committee again for further review. Attachments Design Review Committee Action: Members Present• Pam Stewart, John Mannenno, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Warren Morelion The Committee recommended approval of the proiect subtect to all of the above-mentioned conditions except for No 6 The applicant vwll not be required to add additional pilasters to the screen wall along 4th Street. ~2~ r~~ , ~- :: ry or Rancno Cucamonga ~'annmq Orvrs~on 9091 ~i7-2750 E•VIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) ~ The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed ! project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City Rules and Procedures ~ to Implement CEC;A. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. NCOMPLETE AP.°L/CATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt is the 2soonsrbrlrty of the appucant to ensure Char she app6cahon rs complete at the nine of suomtttal, Cdy scarf will not be available ro penotm work regmred to provide mtsmng rnforma~ron AopGCarron rVumoer for the orolecr to worth fhts Iorm ~ertarrs ~ct Discount Self Storage and RV e Name 8 Address of protect Critchfield Development owners/ 2840 Steeplechase Lane Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Name E Address of deveroper cr protect soonsor Ccntact Person d Address B.R. Critchfield 2840 Steeplechase Lane Bar, CA 91765 Exhibit "N" x,25 I API ANNINC;~FINAI 1Ff1RMC~l`nl INTFRVINITCTf)~ WPC) 9/00 0.,..~ a Named ?cdress or person orepanng this form pf different %rom abovel ,VUmoer (same) 909) 860-5250 Fax (909) 860-9738 inrormahon incicared by astensk (') is not reouired o/non-consrrucnon CUP=s unless otherwise requested by ^aN '~ I Provide a full scale 18-1/? r ; 1) cony of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which rnciuces the pro/ect site, and indicate the sire oounaanes 2i Prowpe a set of color onotographs wnrch show representative views mto the ste from the north south east anc west ~.re:vs into and rrom the site from the pnmary access points which serve the site, and representative views of s,gnihcant eatures rrom the sire Include a map showing location of each photograph 'I °roiea Location Idescnoe) 4th Street and Day Creek Flood Channel ~) assessor=s Parce! Numbers lattach additional sheet d necessary/ 0229-321-008 -5) Gross Sire area ;also rt) Approximately 10 acres (3 phases ) 5) Net Site area (total site srze minus area of public streets &prcoosed ded~cahons) - Descnoe any prcoosed general plan amendment or zone cnance which would aBecr the pro/ect sde (artacn additional sheer (necessary None anticipated h2~ • C~ ,r~ „~. ,.,,,,~,,,., ,_,.,,..~ ,..,, ~.,T.-.,,,.,,_~ ... , .... ,.,~,. d)Inc/ude a descnphon of all permits which will be necessary /tom the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other govemmenral agencies in order fo fully implement the pm/ect t t 2) Sign Permit 4) Business Permit ?1 Descnoe the pnvsical serhng of the sire as it ewsts oerore the pm/ect wclucrnc inrormahon on rcoograohy soil srabrliry aanrs end animals mature trees trans and roads drainage courses and scenic aspecs Descnoe any exisnna structures cn sire rncluoing age and condihoN and the use of the structures Attach phorograons or srondicant features cescnoed In addrnon sire all sources of inrortnanon n e geoioorcal ano/orhvdrologrc sruoies biohc and aroveologrcal surveys traffic sruoresr The site is currently a Southern California Edison easement running north from 4th Street alon the Dav Creek Flood Control Channel. The actual site begins on the north side of 4th Street _ and runs approximately 1725 feet north. The site is currently being used to grow grapes. It is a relatively level site rising approximately ei ht feet over the 1725 foot len th There are no existing structures on the site at this time. 70J Descnbe the known cultural and/or histoncal aspects of the site Site all sources o/ information (books, published reports and oral history) None known ~2~ DI C~NII~IC•Cninl ~C'~p~•C~/"N ..,-~•~~,.n-..r... ~_ _ _~ i 7 7) nscnbe any nose sources and lherr revels that now affect the sde (arroraff roadway Horse etc) and how they will atlect '?posed uses - .I Thic cite is l..r ~+uA ..1 ...... +.. r_i___i_.._ .~ .. -_ _~ proximity to the freeway will have no effect on the property. 21 C iscnoe the proposec ororect rn oetad'Ms snou/d provide an adepuate descnpnon or the ste rn terms or ulbmare use ~n-mcn ~' result from the orcooseo proles; ~norcare rf there are proposec pnases rot development ;he extern or oevercomenr ;o _ Sur wah eacn phase anp the anticipated como/ehon or eacn increment -litacn aocrtronar sheets) Jnecessary _! The proposed project will be a self storage and RV storage _; facility. It will be built in three phases consisting of enclosed, ~ covered, and open storage. Each phase will be completed in - ~-- _ i approximately six months or less. - , 73/Oe. ~-nbe the surroundrng prooenres including rnformaLOn on plants and animals 2nd any cultural, nrstoncal or scenic as ,cis Inorca to the type or lano use r%esreenbal commeroral, etc ), rntensdy or lane use /one-ramdy apanment houses sh ~ s, department stores, etc J and scale o/ development !height, frontage, setback rear yard etc ) _~ The surrounding properties consist of the 15 Freeway to the _ immediate west of the site on 4th Street, Day Creek Flood Control ~ Channel to the immediate east side of the _, property running continuously along the east property line vacant industrial zoned property to the _`~, west of the backside of the property, and a wholesale nursery to the south side of the property. (Continued - see attached sheet) a) EMI rte proposec protect mange she ca<<em scare or cnaracrer pr the surroundrng genera! area or the prolect~ None ,~ w2~ continued.... Descnbe the sumoundmg prooeme~cludmg rn/ormatron on olanrs and animals ~ any cultural crsronca cr scenic -,,..ec;s ,norcare me ape or ranc u., esroennar commercial erc„ rntensrrv cr ;an se rove-ramdv ;oartmen~ nouses moos aeoartmenr stores arc r ano scare of deveroomenr ~hergnt rronrage serbacr< •ear yard erc , ~ The setbacks for the proposed site will conform with city imposed .' setbacks and 45 feet for the southern portion of the property along 4th Street. i • ~, i G I I yi ,i ,, ~,~ 1~Z \ ~ 5) Indicate the type of short-term and long-rnoise to be generated including source and am• t How Hall these nwse levels ar(ect ad/scent properties and on-site uses 'Nhat methods o(scune prooime are proposed The proposed site will not produce any noticeable short or long term noise. Any noise produced will be muffled by the walls surrounding the facility and will not affect the adjacent property owner. 5; ~nercate aeposec removals and/or reGiacemenrs pr mature . r scenic 2es None -; re,care am+ peoies of svate~;,nclucrng domesrc varer supcues) InrG ~m•cn the s,~e cn,ns None 8)/ncrcare expectedamcuntcrwaterusace !Seertfachment~rorusaceesumatesl ;or,caherclaniicatron:,leasecpnac, '~e e;r,carrcnga Gcur,-, 'NdrerJistnct ar 987-.5?; Pes,ce-"ial teal/day) ?eak use IoaliDay) :omnerciavlnd ea!/cav/ac; apprOX. 75 daily ?eak use igal/min/ac) S,Incrare proposed method or sewage CISCOSd/ ~ephC ~ ank R Serer ~(SeOtIC lands are proposep a<<ac~ ;2' ^/a 57" ~esrs '; c~sr_n;~_ e to a sdr, rar;. ,a •+apa ;+srem is prOCGSeO i~C7Ca''e eYpeC;aO Odily sa 'ace cenerancn ~ -= ~~achmer,t a ror usage estimates) =or rurther aan6cauon, please cprrac. 'he Cucamonga COUnt'/ NalerCis,rc, ar b2-- ~esicennallgabday) b Commercial/Ine (ga!/da•daG SIGE`lTIAL F?OJECTS it ~VUmcer ,~ resceruai units :e~ac~ec pvcicate ~: nce cr parcel s,zes m,nrmum ict st-_e anenaximum 'a a.e ~~~ ANNINGIFINAL\FORf 1S1COL'NTER\INITSTDI `p/PD 3/00 ~___ , Attached (mdicale whetherunds are rental or /or sale unds) ^ilAntrcrpated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pncels) 3 -o Rent (per month) 3 ro .2) Specrry number cr bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicare anbcipared household size by and tvpe 's)Inorcate the expected number of school children who snd be resrarng tvdhm the proles ~ontact the appropnare Scnool ~7istncts as shown in Attacnmenf B a Elementary ~ Junior Hrgh c Senior Hrgh COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS _°5) Descnoe type of usetsl and major runchonls) or commercial, rncusrnar or msrrtuaonal uses Self storage facility ta/ floor area of commercial, industrial, onnsbtuhonal uses by e Approximates: 1500 sq. ft. office/ (Phase I) 66,000 sq. ft. enclosed storage/ (Phase II) 35 000 sq. ft. enclosed storage/ (Phase III) 46,000 sq. ft. enclosed storage 27) Indicate hours of operation 8:30 A.M. -5:00 P.M. Seven dav: a week .8) Number of coral employees us part time help ,Naxrmum Shift 8 hours -ime of Maximum Shiff ^g)Provrce breakdown of anncrpared/ob classnc~ahons, mcludmg wage and salary ranges as well as an rndicanon or the rate of hire roc each classification (attach addrhonal sheet dnecessary/ Manager to receive approximately $2,000.00 monthly 30) Estimation of the number of workers ro oe hr2d that cument/v reside in the City One '31)For commercial and mdustna/ uses only, mdreate the source, type and amount o(arr pollution emissions (Data should be venried through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Orstnct at (818) 572-6283) Non-applicable ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fin= and flood control agencies serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine them abd~ty to pmvrde adequate sernce ro the oroposed prorect~ I/so please md~cate theirresoonse r~ L_J ~J I \PLANNING\FINAL\FDRMSICDUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 pan= ~ # • In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge ofhazardous and/or toxic matenalsv 33) Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include but a2 not 6mded to PCB=s, radroacbve substances, peshcrdes and • Herbicides fuels oils solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o(any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use rf known The property is currently being used to row rapes There has undoubtedly been pesticides and herbicides used on the site. 341 Wdl the proposed pro/ec[ involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or roxrc matenals, including but not limited to those examples fisted above ;f yes provide an inventory of all sucn matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses along with the storage and shipment areas shall be ;nown and labeled on the application plans No f hereby certify that the statements fumrshed above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate uahon of this pro/ect to the best of my abiUty, that the facts statements and rnformabon pnaented are true and correct tot he best y knowledge and belief !further understand that additional rn(ormation maybe required to 6e submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the C+ty of Rancho Cucamonga Date /.Z -/7+-~ Signature c Title ~ t.(,m ,i[ lr ~I u Y~ J~ I lPl nNNING\FINGI \Gr1GMC~r'r1l iNTFRVAI~TCTn~ Enron ornn City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: DRCCUP 00-48 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review 00-13 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-48 - CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT -The development of a recreational vehicle (RV) and self storage faality consisting of 166,784 square feet of bwiding area on 12 acres of land in the General Industnal District (Subarea 14), located in the Southern California Edison power line corridor east of the I-15 Freeway, north of 4th Street APN 229-321-08 and 09 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Bob Cntchfield Cntchfield Development • 2840 Steeplechase Diamond Bar, CA 91765 5. General Plan Designation: General Industnal 6. Zoning: General Industnal Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 12-acre site is located in a portion of the Southem Califomia Edison power Ime corridor that is east of the I-15 Freeway and north of 4th Street The site is vacant except for three Southem California Edison utility transmission towers The site is bordered on the west by one mdustnal bwlding and vacant land The site is bordered on the east by Day Creek Channel Bordering the site to the north is a vacant portion of the Edison easement that extends north through the City To the south of the site is the City of Ontario 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: Lease agreement with Southern California Edison ~.J'~ Inltlal Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, Involving at least one Impact that Is "Potentially Significant Impact," "potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Land Use and Planning (/) Transporta4on/Circulation ()Population and Housing (/) Biological Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities and Service Systems (/) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources OAesthetics (/) Water (/) Hazards ()Cultural Resources (/) Air Quakily U Noise ORecreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this Inltlal evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed pro)ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect In this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the pro)ect, or agreed to, by the applicant A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Signed ~ ~^ ' Warren Morelion Assistant Planner December 11, 2001 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mltlgatlon Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, Including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified PolenBally SlBnifiWnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenaally Unless Than siBmfiranl Mili~LOn siBmRranl No I [t Into IeE 1 ct I p LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal• a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/) policies adopted by agencies with Jurisdiction over the pro)ect~ c) Be Incompatible with existing land use In the () () () (/) wcinity~ t1~~ S Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community Comments: a-d) The proposed RV and self-storage protect is a conditionally permitted use in the General Industrial Distract (Subarea 14) and is compatible with existing surrounding land uses The site is currently vacant of structures except for three transmission towers that carry overhead utility cables through the site Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Un~lessn TMn Significant Mitlgahan Sigrufiranl No I n mm letl I n I n 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (/) population protections b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e g ,through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housing Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Operation of the storage facility will require one full-time, 24-hour management position The addition of this employee will not create a demand for additional housing c) The site is currently a Southern California Edison easement that is vacant A caretaker's residence will be developed as part of the protect to house one employee 24 hours a day There is no other housing on-site or within the general vanity of the sde PolenLally SiBnifionl Issues and Supporting Informaton Sources Potentially Un~ese Tha Signifipnt Mitigafion Signifipnt No I ct Inco atetl I d I n 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result m or expose people to potential impacts mvolwng a) Fault ruptures () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shakings O O (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () () (/) ( ) d) Seiche hazards () () () (/) ~~P Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Potentwlly Slprnfiranl Issues and Supporting Information Sources vmenfielly unn°Ie ; m~~ Sipnifinnt Milipa4on Sigmfiont No I tl In (eE I d I tl e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (/) h) Expansive sods O O O (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (/) Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3 8 miles north and west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 5 miles northwest These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0 - 7.0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of produang up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes, is 10 6 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 11 6 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Liquefaction could occur at the site if a strong earthquake coincided with an extended penod of heavy rains raising the local water table The site is otherwise located on stable soils Adhenng to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant d) The site is not located near a body of water e) The site is relatively flat so landsliding or mudflows are not likely to occur. f) The site is relatively flat so grading will be minimal, approximately 25,000 cubic yards Grading will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage g/h) Sod type on-site and in the vicinity is Tutunga-Delhi These soils are excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans They are relatively stable but are subfect to liquefaction when the water table is relatively shallow New developments on such sods are required to meet current earthquake standards as regwred by the Uniform Building Code The Building and Safety Division will require a soils report prior to issuance of building permits The impact is not considered significant The site contains no unique geologic or physical features C~ ~3~ i ."~ Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 PolenUally 9pmfiranl Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenUally Impact unless Less Than SiOmfi®nt MiUgaOan Sipnifieanl No 1 tl In iM I ct I tl 4. WATER. Wdl the proposal result rn ~ a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/) ~ hazards such as floodmg~ I c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) I of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, ~ dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) ~ d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any O O O (/) ' waterbody~ e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) I of water movements j f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, edher O O O (/) through direct adddions or wdhdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or ~ excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability i I g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (/) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of O O O (/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supphes~ ~ Comments: f a) The protect is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage pattern A drainage study/plan showing how stormwater runoff will be handled both during construction and operation shall be provided to the City Engineer for review . i and approval, prior to issuance of a grading permit sl ~ b) The site is not located within a flood zone, although, flood protection is provided by the adtoining, concrete fined, Day Creek Channel I I c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water. The Day Creek Channel, which ' runs adtacent to the east boundary of the site, contains water intermittently, generally during heavy storms The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed, prior to issuance of a grading permit i f-i) The protect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area ~ Spills of hazardous materials such as motor oil, gasoline, and other motor vehicle ' related substances will be addressed in a business plan The business plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Department, prior to issuance of building permds 1 J~ Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 PotenLally Signifi®nl Issues and Supporting Information Sources rntenaally unless man Sigmfimnl MN~aon Sigmfieant Na 1 acl In led I n I n 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () (/) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (/) cause any change in climate d) Create objectionable odors () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joagwn Valley Urnfied Air Pollution Control Distnd, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnct, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects The cnteria pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Two of these, ROG and NO„ are ozone precursors Default values were used where project speafic information was unavailable Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6th edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model The project construction and operational emissions do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the project contribution to regional emission of cntena pollutants Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NO, CO PM,g Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Gradin 3 75 3 75 50 02 47 52 - - 24 64 10 31 Worker Tri s 0 58 0 58 0 82 0 82 1 56 1 56 0 16 0 16 Stations E ui 0 34 034 0 27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E ui 3 12 2 96 28 80 27 36 - - 2 23 2 12 Arch Coatin s 64 63 61 40 - - - - - - As halt 2 62 2 49 - - - - - - Totals 75 04 71 33 79 92 75 98 1 56 1 56 27 05 12 60 SCAQMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No • r1 LJ n LJ h~ Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Area Source 0 13 0 13 1 12 1 12 0 45 0 45 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 14 37 14 37 14 99 14 99 108 64 108 64 6 02 6 02 Totals 14 40 14 40 16 11 16 11 109 09 109 09 6 02 6 02 SCAOMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PM,o and NO, dunng grading activities, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed conditions (operational impacts) for NOx Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated There are no sensitive receptors within Y, mile of the site However, since the state is innon-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust wdl be mitigated by the following measures ~J The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2. Streets bordering the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shalt be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. b) There are no sensitive receptors within Y< mile of the protect site Dunng construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces wtll increase NOx and PM,o levels in the area The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels 1. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The • construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. ~,yo Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 2. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 3. The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use. 4. Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt. 5. Painting activities shall be extended over a period of 65 days. c-d) The proposed protect is the construction of an RV and self-storage faclity The faclity will not have the ability to generate emissions that could cause climatic changes Potmtally SlgNfimN Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenWlly unless Th 9gnifiont Mitipa0on Signifinnt No I n Inm tetl ~ n ~ n 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result ~n a) Increased vehicle taps or traffic congestions () () (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (/) nearby uses d) Insufficent parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () () (/) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists () () () (/) i~ Conflicts with adopted polices supporting () () () (/) alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O O (/) Comments: a) Vehicle trips to storage faclities are generally during off-peak hours and only occasional There is only one employee on-site on a 24-hour basis The increase in vehicle taps to the area will be negligible b-d) The site is a 12-acre rectangular parcel with one access onto 4th Street The gated entry to the protect is set back so that visitors to the site will not be backed up in the street creating vehicle stacking There is an emergency access gate with a Knox dewce proposed approximately 140 feet to the west of the entrance Suffiaent on-site parking for the storage faclity will be regwred as part of development No off-site parking is permitted Therefore, there are no impacts ~.y\ Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 e-f) A Regional Multi-Purpose Trail is proposed adjacent to the Day Creek Flood Channel right-of-way The trail will provide trail users access to community facilities such as parks, schools, and shopping centers The Multi-Purpose trail does not cross at any point within the project area and therefore is not impacted g) Located approximately 3 miles from Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenfia~ly Significant a °ess MNgabon T`h`an Significant No I tl In iM I tl I n 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result m impacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare speces or their () () (/) ( ) habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated species (e g ,heritage trees, () () () (/) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () () (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (/) vernal pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration comdors~ () () () (/) Comments: a) The site is within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower- loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within the U S Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997 Southern California Edison representatives conducted a biological survey of the site on May 17, 2000, which determined that the site may be suitable habitat for the DSFLF Because the site is potential habitat, a protocol survey was conducted by Forensic Entomology Services on August 3, 2001, and completed on September 20, 2001 (report dated November 15, 2001) The survey concluded no adult speamens of the DSFLF were recorded during the eight-week survey period, therefore, the impact is less than significant b-c) The site is an old grape vineyard that is no longer in use The site has no other trees or significant vegetation d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site e) The site, along with other sites in the vianity, is undeveloped However, intermittent industrial development in the area has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past ~,y2 Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 PotenWlly Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potmlially Umnl~ess Tha Signifitanl MrtigaOOn Significant No 1 d Inco tetl I n I C 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a-b) The protect will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation c) The protect site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2) An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization Potenaally Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paannally un~ass Sign~firaM M~figaaan Signifiwnl No I C Inro letl I n I ct 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () (/) ( ) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () (/) ( ) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () (/) ( ) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/) brush, grass, or trees Comments: a,c{1) Environmental Affairs visited the site on May 31, 2000 At that time there were a few piles of illegal dumping on the property (a pile of roofing material, household trash, and tires) There was no evidence of liquid chemical use or storage on the ~y3 • Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 site The inspection did not reveal evidence that would warrant any further hazardous material investigation The illegally dumped debris will be removed during construction of the pro/ect b) Traffic associated with RV and self-storage will be negligible and will not interfere with emergency response/evacuation plans The fencing/gating at the site will limit access to the site In the event of an emergency situation However, the pro/ect will include a Knox box for emergency use e) Existing grape vines, brushes, and grasses will be eliminated from the site during grading The site will be landscaped with components of the 4th Street Master Plan and with ornamental vegetation shown In the Landscape Plan PotenOelly SiOnfipanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenOelly u~eu Than Siprufimnl Mih~hon Signifiranl No 1 n m tee 1 n 1 a 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result gyn. a) Increases In existing noise levels () () () (/) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () (/) ( ) Comments: a-b) The proposed site will not produce any noticeable long-term noise as the site's proposed uses are not intrinsically noisy The walls surrounding the facility will muffle any potential noise The temporary Increase in noise during construction is not considered significant because there are no nearby sensitive receptors According to the City's General Plan, the site Is sub/ect to noise levels greater than 65 DBA from traffic along 4th Street and the I-15 Freeway, which could expose the resident manager to severe noise levels A noise study will be prepared during plan check for the manager's on-site residence to determine appropriate sound attenuation features Potentwlly Signifirani Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unnl~ea 71an Si9rnfitent MNga4on Sigmfiranl No Inpacl Incorporates Irryap Inrpan 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services ~n any of the following areas a) Flre protections O O O (/) b) Pohce protectlon~ O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public facilities, Including roads () () () (/) e) Other governmental services () () () (/) Kyy Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The site, located on 4th Street in Rancho Cucamonga, is served by afire station located on the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, approximately 1 75 miles from the protect site Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect Police protection -One employee will be on-site during business hours Thomy vines will be used to discourage possible graffiti Eight-foot walls and an entry gate, to be locked dunng non-operating hours, will be used at the facility to discourage entry Therefore, the protect will not require additional police protection Schools -The proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new tob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area, therefore, construction activities will not adversely impact local schools The storage facility will have only one employee Parks -Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new tob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area, therefore, construction of an RV and self-storage facility will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities Public facilities -The storage facility will not likely increase traffic on adtacent streets and is consistent will the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan PalenWlly SiBnifimnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially U~eu 7Lhan SiBmfipn( MNgatim Sgnifipnt No 1 h Into IM 1 C I cl 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utd~ties a) Power or natural gasp b) Communication systems ' c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution i facilities ,. .i ., ,~ d) Sewer or septic tanks e) Storm water drainage f) Solid waste disposal g) Local or regional water supplies Comments: (/) (/) (/) O (~) O (~) O (~) O (~) a-g) The proposed RV and self-storage facility will include the construction of one management office The office will use existing systems and utilities and therefore, will not require new systems or alterations to existing utilities h~~ • Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Pmmwny Sigrvfionl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially u ~a ;n`~an Sigmfieanl MN~bon $igrufitant No I n to tea I n I n 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (/) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (/) c) Create light or glares () () () (/) Comments: a-b) The site is visible from the I-15 Freeway, which runs parallel and east of the Day Creek Channel This freeway is elevated approximately 18-20 feet above the protect site The exterior height of the protect is designed to screen interior uses from drivers on the I-15 Freeway Additionally, the site will be screened from view from 4th Street and the freeway by the use of landscaping as required by the Rancho Cucamonga 4th Street Master Plan and General Industral Distract (Subarea 14) c) The proposed RV and self-storage facility will blend with existing uses and will not create additional light or glare within the area Immediately east and west of the site is existing industrial development To the southeast of the site is also industrial development in the City of Ontario Combined the existing development in the area already produces a substantial amount of light during evening hours. Potentially Signfinnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paenwlly $ignifitanl unless MiUgabm 711an Signfitant No I n I tM I C I C 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal. a) Disturb Paleontological resources () () () (/) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (/) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (/) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) Impacts to paleontological and/or archaeological resources are unli kely, based on . the fact that existing development in the area has not uncovered any resources The site was inspected for archaeological and historical resources by Environmental Affairs' archaeological staff, prior to its original sale No resources were encountered during that inspection h"1~ Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Potentially $igrvfimnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenWlly uncle s Tlw~n Sigrvfiranl MNgaOOn Signfirant No I h In tetl I C I c1 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities () () () (/) Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is not likely as the proposed storage facility will only employ one full-time manager b) There is no impact associated with existing recreational opportunities as the property surrounding the protect area is currently developed Potentally S9rvfimnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Palen4alir umeu Tan Significant Mingaeon 9gnifignt Na I cl Inm teC I d I n 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major penods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) 1ly'~ (/) (/) (/) n U C_ Irntial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Potmhally 9grufimnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenfahr Sgnifieanl I C u`~ess M1hh~hon Into tM 7twgn $,gnifimnl I ct No I cl d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) A biological survey of the site was conducted on May 17, 2000, and the Natural Diversity Data Base consulted to identify potential sensitive speaes and habitats in the area The site is currently vacant A portion of the property is bare dirt and the remainder is a previously disced field now overgrown with weedy non-native plant speaes The site is within an area designated as hawng Delhi Sand Sods The survey concluded that the presence of these sots indicates that the site may be suitable habitat for the federally endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSFLF) Because the site is potential habitat, a protocol survey was conducted by Forensic Entomology Services on August 3, 2001, and completed on September 20, 2001 (report dated November 15, 2001) The survey concluded no adult speamens of the DSFLF were recorded during the eight-week survey period. b) Grading the site could generate emissions of criteria pollutants (PM~o and No^) above SCAQMD thresholds The contractor will be regwred to minimize emissions through water applications per the City's standard conditions of approval Additional mitigation measures presented in Section 5 of this Initial Study will reduce impacts to less than sigrnficant c) The protect does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable The site is within a General Industrial Area and is conditionally permitted for RV and self-storage The Initial Study did not identify any impacts (other than short-term construction impacts) that could not be mitigated through the City's standard conditions of approval d) RV and self-storage on a 12-acre site would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The site is located in an industrial area within the Southern California Edison utility corridor so the site is limited to such uses as plant nurseries and storage yards, thus minimizing exposure to potential harmful effects assoaated with high voltage utility lines • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Irntial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Drnsion offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) l~.y~ Initial Study for DRCCUP 00-48 CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 • General Plan EIR (Certified Apnl 6, 1981) • Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) • Industnal Area Speafic Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) • Environmental Assessment/Habitat Conservation Plan for Issuance of Endangered Speaes Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit for Southern California Edison Operation and Maintenance Activities San Bernardino County/Riverside County, California, January 12, 2000 US Fish and Wildlife Service, Southern California Field Office • Limited Environmental Site Assessment for the Property Known as the West Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV T/L RNV, north of 4th Street between I-15 Freeway and Day Creek Channel in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Secured Equities Environmental Affairs Staff, May 11, 2000 • SCE, Rancho Cucamonga Sites, 2001 Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Surveys USFWS Permit #TE-838743-3 (dated October 6, 2001) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect descnbed m this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature / 3 ~ , Date /~ -/oz -o/ Pnnt Name and Title /~,coJ~~_; s~u.~ fo/~.e/L • • ~~ \ • City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaretion fs being circulated for public review in accordance with the CalHomia Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 0/the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Conditional Use PermR DRCCUPOOafB Public Review Period Closes: January 9, 2002 Project Name: Project Applicant: Critchfield Development Project Location (also see attached map): Located in the Soufhem Calrfornia Edison power line condor adjacent to the Day Creek Channel, north of 4th Street APN 22&321-08 and 09 Project Description: The development of a recreational vehicle (R~ and self storage facilely consisting of 166,784 square feet on 12 acres of land in the General Industnal Dstnd (Subarea 14) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a sign cant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The Infial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the proled may have a sgnificant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identrfied potentially signficant effects but (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before the proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwoukt avod the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the proled as revised may have a significant effect on the environment H adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Intial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (809) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review period. January 9.2002 Date of Determination Adopted By 1~ 50 • RESOLUTION NO 02-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-48, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE (RV) AND SELF-STORAGE FACILITY CONSISTING OF 166,784 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA ON 12 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14), LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON POWER LINE CORRIDOR EAST OF THE I-15 FREEWAY, NORTH OF 4TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 229-321-08 AND 09 A. Rentals 1 Cntchfield Development filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRCCUP00-48 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date • 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referencedpublic heanng on January 9, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property located east of the I-15 Freeway and north of 4th Street vnth a street frontage of 310 feet and lot depth of 1,725 feet, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is vacant, the properly to the south consists of nursery in the Crty of Ontano, the property to the east is the Day Creek Channel, and the property to the west is vacant vnth one industrial bwlding, and c The site is within a Southern Califorrna Edison (SCE) utility corridor, which has three utility towers, and d The site is highly visible from the adjoining I-15 Freeway on and off-ramps 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows Y,s\ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-09 DRCCUP 00-48 - CRITCHFIED DEVELOPMENT January 9, 2002 Page 2 a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally inlunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows , a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance Hnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planrnng Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration anth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the statF reports and e~ibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) Design the 8-foot screen walls along 4th Streetand the I-15 Freeway • side of the protect so they are on top of berming to help screen interior storage buildings and recreational vehicles from view ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-09 DRCCUP 00-48 - CRITCHFIED DEVELOPMENT . January 9, 2002 Page 3 2) Add a landscape planter next to the office/caretaker's residence to allow room for berming under screen wall 3) Add reveals to all sandblasted column treatments throughout the protect 4) Wrap spandrel glass around front entry of the office/caretaker's residence 5) Add perforated sheet metal to wrought iron gates 6) Reduce the sign area on the front elevation of office/caretaker's residence so it is proportionate to the proposed sign design and building face 7) Provde a 6-inch curb along drive aisles at entrances and around parking area 8) Landscaping around the protect perimeter shall be planted to the satisfaction of the City Planner Enoineerina Division 1) Missing improvements on street shall be installed, including, but not limited to, curbs and gutters, street trees, streetlights, signing, and striping, etc Fourth Street is a City"Mator Divided Highway " 2) Streetlights shall be 9500 Lumen No sidewalk on 4th Street 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for 66Kv electrical) on the protect side of 4th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site from the protect boundaries Reimbursement ofone-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is not feasible because the property is located in the City of Ontario. 4) The drive approach shall be per City Standard 101 C, 35 feet is minimum vwdth requirement 5) Provide parkway landscaping along 4th Street all the wayto Day Creek Channel Landscaped parkways shall conform to 4th Street Beautification Master Plan 6) An in-lieu fee for construction of 4th Street median shall be paid pnorto issuance of bwldmg permit The amount of the contribution shall be one-half the cost of the median (currently estimated at $72 per linear foot) times the length of the frontage KS3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-09 DRCCUP 00-48 - CRITCHFIED DEVELOPMENT January 9, 2002 Page 4 7) Parking stalls perpendiculartothe drive entry shall be a minimum of 75 feet from street curb face to the nearest edge of parking stall Environmental Mitioation Av Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabdmng agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance vnth SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Streets bordering the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low mission factors and high~nergyeffiaency The construction contractor shall ensure the Construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean-alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews Hell shut offegwpmentwhen not in use >I .i r~ I 8) Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt 9) Painting activities shall be extended over a period of 65 days The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • f~ 1~sy ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-09 ' DRCCUP 00-48 - CRITCHFIED DEVELOPMENT f January 9, 2002 4 Page 5 I APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman I ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary l ~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-mnt ' AYES COMMISSIONERS• • NOES COMMISSIONERS ~ ABSENT COMMISSIONERS .I Yi r ,' • ~` ,~ I i~ ~~ 1~~5 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-48 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Fonns to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation wdl be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect Reports will be avatlable from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 K~ Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained If technical expertise beyond the City staffs Is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action Item that was Identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an Impact Issue requiring no further monitoring well be signed off as completed by the project planner or responslble City department at the bottom of the MMP Repor4ng Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mltlgatlon measures The protect planner Is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form well be completed by the protect planner or responslble City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been Issued The protect planner or responslble City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies If compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible Clty department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mltlgatlon measures are Implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessaryfunds (or otherforms of guarantee) with the Clty These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor Clry staff Ume to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the Clty with a plan for monitoring the mltlgatlon actlvltles at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall Identify the reporteras an Individual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been Implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits 11FINAL\CEQAIMMP Form-rev wpd ~~ C~ Project File No.: DRCCUP00-48 Initial Study Prepared by: Warren Morelion Applicant: Bob Crltchfield Date: _Januarv 9. 2002 .. , •Air Ciuality `. ~ - ~" ,~c, ,• v ~~ ~ ~ The site shall be treated with wat th .. .`i~'°•'"`•' .,,~.,. ~,, CP ,~ xv y~ ~kh~_'`~ xi ~t"Yo-i*F?~~ B/C .. - 'tv' ~~~ vrr ~' ~ r eves- w~.w~ av~1r~Y ... - "qtr' ' rya ~u~,~~v~~~iy" •. r . N'~~~: ~,~r~g,o a,~. '~~^t,~°~.rci~`r. `Zh~}~th< Y: ,'P'i ~'~ ~ ', T ~;' ~' er or o er soil stabilizing agent) approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce Rewew ofplans/AS necessary A/C ya PM~o emission, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Streets bordering the site shall be swept according to a CP g/C Review of plans/As A/C schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions necessary ya associated wdh vehicle tracking of soil off-sde Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site CP g/C Rewew of plans/As during such episodes necessary A/C 2/a Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas CP B/C that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM Rewew of plans/As A/C ya ~o emissions necessary The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy effiaency The construction contractor shall CP B/C Rewew of plans/As A/C yq ensure the wnstruction Grading Plans include a statement necessary that all construction egwpment will be tuned and mamtamed m accordance with the manufacturer's specifications The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible CP g/C Review of plans/As q/C ya The construction contractor shall ensure that construction- necessary gradmg plans include a statement that work crews will shut Review of plans off egwpment when not in use CP/CE B C 2 The construction contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt CP Rewew of plans/As Painting activdies shall be eMended over a period of 65 B/C necessary A/C y4 days CP C /As necessary C a • • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person, CDD -Community Development Dvector CP -City Planner or designee CE -City Engineer or desgnee BO - Bwiding Offiaal or designee PO -Police Captain or designee FC -Fire Chief or desianee momtoring Frequency -= t A-With Each New Development B - Pnor To Construction C -Throughout Construction D - On Completion E - Ooeratinc Method ofVerifl¢ation, `;` °'v'~« A - On-site Inspection B -Other Agency Permit / Approval C -Plan Check D -Separate Submittal (Reports (Studies /Plans) 1 - Wifhhoid Recordation of Final Map 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permd 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy 4 -Stop Work Order 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRCCUP00-48 SUBJECT: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND SELF-STORAGE FACILITY APPLICANT: CRITCHFIELD DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) POWER LINE CORRIDOR, EAST OF I-15 LOCATION: FREEWAY, NORTH OF 4TH STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapabon shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if bulding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations Comoletion Date -~-~- -~~- -~-~- / I SC-11-01 1 h~~ Prgect No DRCCUPOD-48 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions I / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Ctty Planner _ _ _ • 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and I / State Ftre Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ _ submttted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be l l submttted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for I / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ bwidtng, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ _ time of budding permd issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / / by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits _ _ _ Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet Ctty standards The final design, locations, and / / the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval pnor to the _ _ _ tssuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be _/_!~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All bulding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, / / including proper illumination --- 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Ctty Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of budding permits 12 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real aver rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured / / products - - - D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and _ streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commeraal and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main I / building colors -- SC-11-01 2 ~~\ Project No DRCCUP00-48 Comolehon Date • E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abut: a bwldmg, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 fees wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parkmg stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaceslplazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances and exits shall be striped per City standards F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping m the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape archdect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parkmg • stalls, suffiaent to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 4 Trees shall be planted ~n areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Division 6 Special landscape features such as mounding, is regwred along 4th Street 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this pro/ect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Diwsion 9 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code 10 On projects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this project or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the project If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way / / / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- / / / / / / -//- / / -/-/- -/-/- SC-11-01 3 ~~ 2 Protect No DRCCUP00-48 Comolehon Date G. Signs 1 Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre _/_/_~ separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of I / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credo, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Ctty Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• • J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the mom switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred pnor to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are required for Penang and/or walls 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance / / -/-/- _/_/_ -/_/-~ SC-11-01 4 ~~~ Protect No DRCCUP00-08 Comoledon Date •~ I. 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRCCUP00-48) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commeraal or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance ~ 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Budding Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and poor to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) I I New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering ~ use, area, and fire-resistiveness (2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Budding Code for requred occupancy separation(s) 3 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requred fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 4 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A I M ;Grading I1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in I substantial conformance with the approved grading plan ' 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~ pertonn such work ,i '3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check ., 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits %S A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of N, ~ combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California -, Registered Civil Engineer I SC+.1-01 5 ~~ -~-~. -~-~- -~_~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / / -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~_~. Protect No DRCCUP00-08 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOP COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Street Improvements 1 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Treil Island Trail Other 4th Street X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 2 Improvement Plans and Construction Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program O. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer P. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way Q. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been Issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval In the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits In the case of ail other residential protects r 1 L_J -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- r1 LJ SC-11-01 6 ~lQ S Project No DRCCUP00-48 Comolehon Date •R. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for al new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior tc budding permit issuance rf no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, with direct lighting to be provided by ali entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be invandal-resistant fixtures T. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices U. Security Fencing • 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 V. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibihty 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department W. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and Ives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ~NDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / / /_/_ -~-~- -~-~- _~_~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-11-01 7 ~~~ - • . ~- Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The following conditions of approval represent the rmnimum standazd for approval of the protect as submitted These condrhons aze based on the plans submitted and may not include all Ftre District regmrements for the proposed protect. Changes m the protect may result m addrhonal Fue District requirements Please make the necessary corrections poor to resubmitting the protect for review. The applicant shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, (909) 477-2770, Ext 3009, if there aze questtons regarding the Conditions of Approval set for this protect Standard Conditions of Approval for Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Fire District Plan Review Number: FD-00.0197 Planning Project Number: DRCCUP00-48 Project Location or Address: North of 4th East of I-15 Freeway Plan Type: Storage and Boat Storage Fire District Review by: Steve Locati Date: Apri15, 2001 Planner: Warren Morelion Cat o Conditions of A royal a aired Corrections, Details or Notes FPl Community Facilities Districts A. This protect is subject to the requceettients of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. FP2 Water Improvement Plans A. Hydrants on Pubbe Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a 5re hydrant loraaon plan Streets- Submittals for the review and approval by the Fm Distract and the Water District B. Hydrants on Private Poor m the issuance of any building percent, the applicant shall submit construction plans, Streets- Submittals speci5cahons, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and a vat b the Fue District Plans and installation shall ca 1 with Fire District standards C. Regwred F1re Flow Fun flow requceements for this p%tect shall be 2250 gallows per minute at a muumwn residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch m accordance with Fae Code Appendix ID-A, as amended. The requued Fue Flow shall be delivered by Fue Hydrants located in accordance wrth Fue Code A III-B, as amended. D. Public Fire Hydrants All requued public fue hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable poor to delivering any combustible building materials on site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/devel er shall submr final test ort to the Fue Safe Drvrsron. E. Private Fire Hydrants All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable poor to dehvenrig any combustible bwiding materials on site (i.e ,lumber, roofing materials, etc ). Frre Constmction Sernces representative shall inspect the installation and wriness hydrant flushin The burder/develo er shall subrmt final test r ort to the Fue Safe Dmsron G. Final Acceptance For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water Drstnct or Fue Coastmction Sernces, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test r ort to the Frre Safety Dmsion. H. Enstiag Fire Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan H drants subceatted for review and approval Include main size I. Fire Sprinkler Prior to the issuance of any building perms; the applicant shall submit coastmction plans, Under round S em specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground J. Private System If the system is private the applicant shall do the following poor to the issuance of the building Maintenance and Repair- Pest 1) Submit proof that provisions have been made for the a®ual testing, repau wad Required Note maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District 2) For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a recgrrocal f maintenance a ement, which shall be submitted to the Fue District for acc lance K Fire Hydrant Markers Prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicatuig the rue hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protectioce Dismct and City of Rancho Cucamonga • r ~1 y • Engineering Standazd Plan 134, "(nsta/laaon ojReJlecnve Hydrant Markers " On pnvate these markers are to be maintained m ood condmon b the owner FP3 Water Availabili .~, Prior to the issuattce of a building pemirt, the applicant shall provide evidence of ade uate flre q flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District Water Availability (or Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the water district and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection D~smct If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinginshing system maybe required m each stmcture affected by the insufficient flow FP4 Automatic Ftire S nnkler S ems A. Required Fire RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard requires an approved automatic fire Protection sprinkler system F. Fire Sprinkler Plan Prior to the issuance of a building perintt, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic 5re Submittal spruilder system to Fire Construction Sernces for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Constmaron Sernces t G. Fire Sprinkler Prior to the issuance of a cernficate of occupancy, the tae sprinkler system(s) shall be tested Readiness and accepted by Fue Constmction Sernces H. Fire Sprinkler The fire sprinkler system moiitonng system shall be installed, tested and openitional Monitoring unmediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Momtonng is required with 20 rinklers in Gro I Oc aes or 100 or more ers in all other Oc ancies FPS Fire Access B. Commercial: Commercial Prior to the recordation of a subdivision, tiacUpareel map or the issuance of any grading perrmt, whichever occurs fast, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fue Distna for all fire district emergency access roads to within 150.feet of all pomons of the exterior of ev stiuctiue on site C. Residential & Residential & Commercuil Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit Commercial and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and coum, public or pnvate from the Fue , District in consultation with the Grading Comimttee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the andth of the street or court measured flow ]me to flow lute All proposed 5re apparatus turnarounds shall be cleazly mazked when adead-end street exceeds 150.feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructrons such as traffic calrnmg deuces (speed bumps, humps, etc), control gates, bollards, or other modifications m fire lanes or access roadways without nor written a val of the Fue District, Fue Saf Division. D. Street Signs -Private Street Signs A note shall be placed on the site plan indicating that all stnxt/road srgns shall be Required Note designed and maintained as either interoally or externally illuminated m a manner meeting the a val of the Fue District E. Minimum Widths and The mimmum width for a fire district access road or fire lane is 26-feet The nnnirmim inside Heights turn mdins is 20.fcet The minimum outside turn radius is 50-feet The nnninmm radius for cu]- de-sacs is 50.feet The mmimiim vertical clearance is 14-feet, Crmclus At any entry median the trnnirnum width of traffic lanes shall be 20.feet To park m a 5re lane the MINIMUM roadwa with is 34-feet cleaz and unobstmcted H. Key (Kno:) Boa A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspectron. Proof of purchase shall Required Note be subrmtted prior to tmal building plan approval Contact the Fue Safety Division for specific details and ord information. I. Access Gates Prior to the issuance of any grading pemnts, the applicant shall submmt and obtain the Fue District's approval of the construction of any gate across required Fue District access roadwa dnvewa L. Vegetation Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, Cr inches from the ound , so as not to a fire vehicles M. Site DireMones A buildug directory shall be required, as noted below - Li ted direct within 20.feet of main enttanc s to the site N. Construction Access - Emergency access, a minuium 26-feet m width and 14-feet 6mches m height shall be Required Note provided and maintained free and cleaz of any obstmctions at all times during constructions, m accordance with Fue Distnd Standards P. Access Problems Amend sue access to accommodate Fue District emergency vehicle access ~~ ~~ Q. Street Signs - Posting Pnor to the issuance of a building pemut, the apphcant shall submit plans and obtain approval Fire Lanes from the Fue Distnct for fire lanes on requued fire distnct access roadway less than 40-feet in width. The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and sigoage A drawuig of the proposed signage that meets the mmunum Fue Distnct Standazd shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucaznonga Fae Protection Dismct at (909) 477-2770 For a co of the "FD Access - Fue Lanes" standard R Fu-e Lane Approval Pnor to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the fire ]ones shall be installed in and Maintenance- accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CCBcR's or other approved docwrients shall Required Note contain a fire lane map and pronsions that prohibit pazkuig m the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented T. Premises New bwlduigs other than dwellings shall post the address mth minimum 8-inch numbers on IdeatiLcahon- contcasung background, visible from the street and electncally illumurated during penods of CommerciaVladustrial dar~ess Whea the building setback exceeds 200-feet from the pubhc street an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be onded at the entrance FP9 Combustible Pnor to the issuance of a building perrrut for combustible constmction, the bwlder shall Construction Letter- submit a letter to the Fue District on wri>pany letterhead stating that water for 5re fighting Required Note Piiposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before an combustible matenal is laced on-site FP10 Building Use Pnor to the issuance of any building perrmts, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of Letter -Required Note intended use for each building on-site to the Fue Distnct for review and approval Contact the Fue Saf Dinsion for the form FPl l Architectural Pnor to approval of a site develop~nt/use permit, or the issuance of a bwldmg permit, Building Plans whichever occurs fast, the applicant shall submit plans for the renew and approval of Foe Consavcnon Sernces Call the Fue Conctrnchon Sernces Umt at (909) 477-2713 for the Ftre Safe Site/Arehitectural Notes to be laced on the fans m to submittal FP14 Fees A. Applicable Fees Fue Distract fee(s), plus a $1 00 mcrofilm fee per `plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Dismct as follows •' - $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) - $132 for Water Improvement Plaa Renew/Underground Water Supply - $677 (per new buildug) for New Commcercial and Iadustnal Development •• Note Separate plan check foes for tenant unprovemrnt work, fire protection systems (fire sprvildets, alarm systems, firC exhnemnchuig systems, etc ), and/or any consultant renews will be assessed n s to submittals of laps FP15 Hazard Control Permits A. Permit Categories As noted below Special Permits maybe regwred, dependent upon intended use _ a Creaeral Use Perffit shall be requued for any actinty or operation not specifically dumbed below, wlvch m the~udgment of the Fue Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous ro life or property FP16 Hazardous Materials A. Businesses Required 1 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or to Prepare Business dischazges a hazardous matenal in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or Emergency/Contingency 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time m the course of a yeaz Plans 2 All hazardous waste generators, regazdless of quantity generated 3 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pesticides, as defined by ' FIFRA, regazdless of amount 4 Any business that handles DOT Hazazd Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) 1/ ~~ u r~ regazdless of amount, 5 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T P Q) Extremely Hazardous Substances aze designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and aze listed in 40 CFR Part 355 See Appendix B of this ginde for an alphabetical list of EHS's 6 Any business subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also lmown as SARA Title III Generally EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 lbs or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There aze some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Undergound Storage Tanks (USTs) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements To get more inforniahon on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Trer II forms need not be submitted to the vanous State and Federal agencies Submtssron of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement However, EPCRA does require hill annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret hrmtahons of EPCRA and must sign every page of inventory 7 Any business that handles radroachve matenal that ta Lsted m Appendix B of Chapter I of 10 CFR B. Business If the Facility is a NEW business, a Cernficate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety Emergency/Contingency will not be finalized until the San Bemazdino County Ftre Department reviews your Plan- New Business Business Emergency/Contingency Plan Cahfonua Government Code, Section 65850 2 (Hazardous Materials prohibita the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met Release Response Plans or is meeting specific hazazdous matena] disclosure requirements A Rrsk Management and Inventory) Program (RMP) may also be requued if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facilrty Contact County Fire, Hazardous Matenals Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance D. Rancho Cucamonga The Fire Code adopted by the Fire Distract has a provision requinng collection of Fire DisMct information regazding hazardous matenals at facilities for purposes of fire code Information implementation and emergency response Pnor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan- New Business (Hazardous Matenals Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire Distract after rt is approved by the San Bernazdino County Frre Department. In some cases additional infonnahon that is not in the business emergency/contingency plan maybe required m order [o s ort local fire revenhon and ewer enc re once ro FP17 Plan Submittal- Plans shall be subrmtted and approved pnor to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Required Note Buildug, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electncal, and RCFPD Ordinances FDIS and FD32, Gmdelmes and Standards Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at tune of submittal of plans Note A separate grading plan check subrmttal is required for all new constmchon protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yazds or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepazed, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer FP18 Otter Requirements/Comments: (Note: Pnor to Planning Division approval the applicant must address all and resolve all Fire Distract coaitiients and/or conditions ) h lu C L. T_V.. O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 9, 2002 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner BY. Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2001-00083-RIPTIDE-Asixmonth review for compliance with the conditions of approval for entertainment consisting of a D.J., dancing, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with an ewsting restaurant with bar and billiard hall in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at 6620 Carnelian Street-APN• 201-811-56, 59, 60, and 61 BACKGROUND. On June 27, 2001, the Planning Commission approved entertainment at Riptide with a condition that the permit be reviewed for compliance with conditions of approval after six months Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 01-68 for your reference, (Exhibit "F") A review of Code Enforcement and Planning Division records show there have been no citations issued or complaints received for the location In the past six months A phone intennew was conducted with the manager of Riptide on December 11, 2001. The manager indicated that there have been no complaints from surrounding residents or businesses with the operation of the facility, and that all conditions of approval of the Entertainment Permit have been met since it vies approved. Based on review of Police Department records, there have been 12 calls received for the location in the last six months (May 1, 2001 to December 3, 2001). All but two of the calls were after midnight A check of records for aone-year period prior to approval of entertainment shows 32 calls (May 1, 2000 to May 14, 2001), therefore, the rate of calls has decreased 25 percent The types of calls included assisting medical orfire personnel, area and vehiGe checks, disturbances, and fights One incident resulted in an arrest for resisting a peace officer. Further review by the Police Department companng Riptide with other businesses in the City that combine alcohol and entertainment has shown that Riptide is not statistically the worst bar, nor is it the best Records show the Police Department has received calls for fights and assaults at all of the establishments studied. Although, this can be expected because of the nature of businesses serving alcoholic drinks, Riptide does appear to have a higher than average number of physical and alcohol related calls Forthis reason the Chief of Police, Pete Ortiz has recommend review of the Permit again in six months. ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00083 -RIPTIDE January 9, 2002 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends another review of EntertainmentPermitDRC2001-00083 in six months Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB WM mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" Exhibd "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Resolution - Six-Month Police Call History -One-year Police Call History Pnor to Entertainment Permit Approval - Planning Division Questionnaire to Police Department -Police Response Letter - Resolution No. 01-68 of Approval r-1 L~ L J l- 2 m E~E ~ RTAINMENT PERMIT DRC n ~ RIPTIDE BAR 6620 Carnelian Street i 2001-00083 D ~ t`14 ~ l ~ ~ a ~ qa ~1J ° ° °~ ear .o ~: 0 „ -Y, P ~ ~ ° a oo ~ 6 L ,-- 480 Feet 30 FWY i [~ o ~? q ,~ ~, ~ d~ ~ PROJECT SITE Location Map aka 0 goo o a r-~ n~~~ r~~ U k„~,~ f/,r`~,_ ,,,~ n o oo~ 00 • C.1 ^ ~ a ~ ~~S ~ ~' <1~~~~ ~c~ Q ~ ~~] N m K CALL HISTORY - From os/ol nool rnti 1vo32oo1 Date I Time initlal pll type final pll type inddent # OSIO6n001 00 50 11 415E INC INCIDENT/MISC LAW ENF CALL locatlon RC011260015 5620 CARNELIAN ST 07/042001 0514 18 459A PC459 AUDIBLE ALARM RC011650036 6620 CARNELIAN ST 0BI19n001020256 911FU Ldrnirei winmw.~....~....... ___._ 01 35 07 FD pC14g 01 13 59 415 PC415 11242001 02 04 12 8 6820 dispo Report To Follow Taken Necessary report number 110105022 Taken r d tcadlogsUogs2000 mdb Address Detail address select • Page 1 of 1 • Tuesday, December 04, 2001 ~~ • rt I t i CALL HISTORY c - Flom osrolrzaooTnn, osnarzool Dam / erne wool call type Wool tali type 05/132000 1536 32 242R I I INC INCIDENTIMISC LAW ENF CALL RC001340154 6620~ARNEUAN ST ~ 05x262000 02 0210 4165 i 1 dispo Report To I B Necessary • RIPTIDE report number 110004967 Taken vorn/rtcp0 00 04 59 XPAT XPAT EXTRA PATROL ~ ' 7 5 RC00172(gp2 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Necessary Action Taken 07/08@000 01 U810 CCODES CCODES COUNTYCODES RC001900013 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Necessary Action Taken 08/062000 00 51 44 INC INC INCIDENTIMISC LAW ENF CALL RC002190014 9 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Necessary Action Taken 0&242000 00 30 34 PEDCK PEDCK PEDESTRIAN CHECK RC002370006 I ~ ~ O 0 C5 ~ 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Anent 091202000 23 54 48 415E PC647F ~ 6 ~ - DRUNK IN PUBLIC COD RC002640261 E 0/~I 6620 CARNELIAN ST Anent 110010142 10252000 16 49 27 TRWCC PC486 TRU PETTYTHEFT REPORT RC002990199 6620 CARNELIAN ST s Report To Fdlor, 110011621 11/162000 11 57 57 COUNTR PC242 ASSAULT i l RC003210100 6620 CARNELIAN ST dl Report To Fdlow 1 110012519 12222000 O7 1959 FD PC459 TRU VEHICLE BURGLARY REPORT RC003570008 6620 CARNELIAN ST Report To Fdlow 110013901 / x 01212001014012 415 PC415 DISTURBANCE RC010210022 8620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Unknown 03/032001 024856 459A PC459 AUDIBLE ALARM RC010820040 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC False Alarm 04!1311001 221618 4155 PC647F DRUNK IN PUBLIC RC011030256 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Reparl To Fdlow 110104141 & ~' G 0 1 04212001 22 45 04 AREACK AREACK AREA CHECK REWESTED RCA11110214 6620 CARNELIAN ST ,RCC Cancelled 042212001015402 415E PC415 FIGHT R/`.nttt9m~a na~n reoun re~i cr orr• r_.,.... ri.. e..x..a .• • e.taddrogsVags2000 mdb Business Detail business select Page 1 d 1 Tuesday, May 15, 2001 ANCdO C:UCAMONGA Memorandum DATE: December 13, 2001 TO: Pete Ortiz, Police Captain FROM: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: RIPTIDE (6620 CARNELIAN) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT REVIEW On January 9, 2002, the Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct a 6 month review of Riptide's entertainment permit. We receroed the attached call history from your department; however, your assistance is needed interpreting this data. Questions that the Planning Commission are likely to ask would include: • How does the rate of Riptide's calls compare to other bars with entertainment in Rancho Cucamonga? Higher or lower? In other words, is it a normal volume of calls that you would expect for this type of business? • How do Riptide's call types compare to other bars with entertainment in Rancho Cucamonga? Ratio of misdemeanors or felonies? • Does the Police Department have any concerns with continued entertainment at this business? Your comments are needed by December 24. cc: Warren Morelion, Assistant Planner U • Exhibit "D" (,(p C I T Y O F RAn'CaO CLCAMORGA Memorandum DATE: December 20, 2001 TO: Pete Ortiz, Chief of Police FROM: Dan Wafters, Crime Analyst BY: Dan Wafters, Crime Analyst SUBJECT: Riptide Entertainment Permit Review In response to the request for information from Dan Coleman on December 13, 2001 for the review of Police Incidents at and around 6620 Carnelian aka. Riptide 1 2 3. C~ Exhibit "E" How does the rate of Riptide's call compare to other bars with entertainment in Rancho Cucamonga? a. Comparing against other establishments with alcohol and entertainment Riptide is not the worst nor is it the best How do Riptide's call types compare to other bars with entertainment in Rancho Cucamonga? a. We have had calls for fights and assaults at all of the establishments studied. Due to the nature of the business this is to be expected but not condoned Riptide does appear to have a higher than average number of physical and alcohol related calls Does the Police Department have any concerns with continued entertainment at the business? a. The Police department always has concerns with anything that contnbutes to crime and calls for service. L'~- RESOLUTION NO 01-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO DRC2001-00083, A REQUEST TO ALLOW ENTERTAINMENT CONSISTING OF A DJ, DANCING, AND LIVE ACOUSTIC ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH BAR AND BILLIARD HALL, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 201-811-56, 59, 60, AND 61. A. Recitals. 1. Tomas Oeschger of Riptide filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. DRC2001-00083, as described rn the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 3. On the 27th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on June 27, 2001, inGuding wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a. The application applies to property located at 6620 Carnelian Street and is presently improved with a commercial shopping center, and b. The property to the north of the subject site is the future Route 210 Freeway, the properties to the south and east are commercial shopping centers, and the property to the west is existing single-family development; and c. The proposed request is to allow entertainment consisting of a DJ, danang, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with an existing restaurant and billiard hall. The hours of operation for the DJ and danang are Monday through Sunday from 8:00 p.m. to 12:00 p.m. The proposed hours for the acoustical entertainment are Monday through Sunday from 4:00 p.m. to 7.00 p m. The current hours of operation for the establishment are Monday through Friday2:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and Exhibit "F" L~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 018 DRC2001-00083 -RIPTIDE June 27, 2001 Page 2 d. West of the commercal center are single-family homes In the past, the homes have been adversely impacted by nusance problems associated with the previous restaurant with bar and Entertainment Permit in the same location The problems included loud music and noise and loitenng within the parking lot in the late evening and early moming hours. e. Because of the nuisance problems and noncompliance with conditions of approval by the previous owner, the City conducted a revocation heanng in 1991 and 1994. On October 5, 1994, the previous owner relinquished his Entertainment Perrnk. f. The City received one complaint in 1997 and one In 1999 from residents concerned about the excess noise as a result of a DJ and dancing at the subject location. g. The nature of the business will have the poiential for nuisance problems such as loud music, loud noise, and loitenng activities with the parking lot in late evening and early moming hours. These types of nuisance problems could adversely impact the adjacent single-family residences However, staff believes that if the applicant conforms to all conditions of approval, and with reasonable hours of entertainment, the surrounding business and adjacent residences to the west will not be impacted. L..J 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng, and upon the speGfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner, and c. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business forwhich such pennR is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, pemtit, or license issued in conjunction v~nth the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not intertere with the peace and gwet of the surrounding commercial center and adjacent single family residences; and f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identfied in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualAyActof 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEOA Guidelines. L°~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-68 DRC2001-00083 -RIPTIDE . June 27, 2001 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subtect to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Division 1) This approval is only for an entertainment permit that would allow a DJ, dancng, and live acoustic entertainment in coniunction v~nth an ewsting restaurant and billiard hall Any change of intensity or type of entertainment shall regwre a modification to this permit. 2) The days and hours of operation for entertainment shall be limited to DJ and dancing Sunday through Thursday 8.00 p m. to 10.00 p.m. and Fnday and Saturday 8.00 p m. to 11:00 p m. The acoustical entertainment is limited to Monday through Sunday from 4.00 p.m. to 7.00 p.m. The acoustical entertainment is limited to one non-amplified instrument or one electronic keyboard and/or one singer. On occasions an adddional person may accompany the singer Any expansion of days and/or hours shall require modification to this permt. 3) No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04 090, shall be permitted. 4) Entertainment shall be conducted inside the budding. 5) When entertainment is being conducted, doors and vhndows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. 6) Extenor noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB during the hours of 7.00 a m. to 10.00 p.m. and 60 dB during the hours from 10.00 p m to 7.00 a.m. 7) Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the pnmary use and not from a separate extenor entrance. Other exits shall be for "Fire Ewt Only." 8) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adiacent residences, businesses, or operations inGuding, but not limited to, noise, loitenng, parking or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the pernd. 9) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniforn Bwlding Code, or any other City Ordinances. • 10) This pertnit shall be renewed annually by the applicant per MuniGpal Code Section 5.12.115. ~`O • ! PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-88 DRC2001-00083 -RIPTIDE June 27, 2001 . Page 4 11) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed secunty guard from a reputable secunty firm shall be required to be on the premises from 8.00 p m until the parking lot is cleared after the conclusion of any entertainment. The guard shall be in peace officer attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the faality to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbance. 12) This permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission in suc months for review of compliance with conditions of approval. 13) The applicant shall post and enforce "employee parking only" in parking area directly adtacent to the residential development to the west. Fire District/Buildina & Safety Division 1) The maximum number of occupants shall not exceed building and fire codes The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the City's Fire Prevention Unit Division. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~r ATTEST: ~~ ` " " - " ' - Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES• COMMISSIONERS: NONE • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS. MANNERINO L\\ • RESOLUTION NO 02-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO DRC2001-00083, A REQUEST TO ALLOW ENTERTAINMENT CONSISTING OF A D J , DANCING, AND LIVE ACOUSTIC ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH BAR AND BILLIARD HALL, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Rentals. 1 On May 21,1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2 Tomas Oeschger filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. DRC2001-00083, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 3 On the 27th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and approved Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-68, requinng a si~month rewew for compliance.. 4 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng on June 27, 2001, including v~ntten and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to property located at 6620 Carnelian Street and is presently improved with a commercial shopping center; and b The property to the north of the subtect site is the future Route 210 Freeway, the properties to the south and east are commercal shopping centers, and the property to the west is existing single-family development; and L12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-10 DRC2001- 00083 -RIPTIDE . January 9, 2002 Page 2 c. The proposed request is to allow entertainment consisting of a D J , Danang, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with an existing restaurant and billiard hall The hours of operation fo~the D.J and dancng will be Monday through Sundayfrom 8.00 p m. to 12:00 p m The hours for the acoustical entertainmentwill be 4 00 p m. to 7.00 p m ,also Monday through Sunday. The Current Hours of operation for the establishment are Monday through Fnday 2:00 p.m to 2 00 a.m., and d. West of the commeraal center are single-family homes The homes have been adversely impacted by nuisance problems associated wrath the restaurant's location, such as loud music, noise and loitenng within the parking lot in the late evening and early morning hours before by the same business that previously had a restaurant vinth bar and entertainment permit e. Because of the nusance problems and noncompliance with conditions of approval, the City conducted a revocation heanng in 1991and 1994. On October 5, 1994, the applicant relinquished his Entertainment Permit f. The City received one complaint in 1997 and one in 1999 from residents concerned about the excess noise as a result of a D.J. and dancing at the subject location A review of Code Enforcement and Planning Division records show there have been no utations issued orcomplaints received for the location in the past six months g Based on review of Police Department records, there have been 12 calls received • for the location in the last six months (May 1, 2001 to December 3, 2001). All but two of the calls were after midrnght. For the one-year penod, priorto approval of entertainment, there were 32 calls to the Police (May 1, 2000 to May 14, 2001), therefore, the rate of calls has decreased 25 percent The types of calls included assisting medical or fire personnel, area and vehide checks, disturbances and fights One incident resulted in an arrest for resisting a peace officer. Further review by the Police Department companng Riptide with other businesses in the City that combine alcohol and entertainment has shown that Riptide is not statistically the worst bar, nor is it the best. Records show the Police Department has received calls for fights and assaults at all of the establishments studied. Although, this can be expected because of the nature of businesses serving alcohol dunks, Riptide does appear to have a higher than average number of physical and alcohol related calls h. The nature of the business will have the potential for nwsance problems such as loud music, loud noise, and loitenng activities with the parking lot in late evening and early morning hours These types of nuisance problems could adversely impact the adjacent single-family residences However, staff believes that if the applicant conforms to all conditions of approval, and with reasonable hours of entertainment, the surrounding business and adjacent residences to the west vhll not be impacted. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; and L\ ~ RESOLUTION NO 02-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO DRC2001-00083,AREQUESTTOALLOWENTERTAINMENT CONSISTING OF A D J , DANCING, AND LIVE ACOUSTIC ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION W ITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH BAR AND BILLIARD HALL, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 6620 CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment 2 Thomas Oeschger filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No DRC2001-00083, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application " 3 On the 27th day of June 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and approved Planning Commission Resolution No 01-68, requiring asix-month review for compliance 4 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 5 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referencedpublic hearing on '~ ~^^'~-~;-'~;.:anuary 9, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speaficaliy finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 6620 Carnelian Street and is presently improved with a commercal shopping center, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is the future Route 210 Freeway, the properties to the south and east are commercial shopping centers, and the property to the west is existing single-family development, and h ~•~-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-10 DRC2001- 00083 -RIPTIDE • January 9, 2002 Page 3 b That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner, and c That the applicant, or any person assoaated with him as pnnapal or partneror in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business forwhich such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competentlunsdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind orof a felony or of any cnme involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years ,and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and gwet of the surrounding commeraal center and adjacent single-family residences; and f That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of matenal fact in the regwred application 4 This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categoncallyexemptfroin the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Gwdelines. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below Planning Droision 1) This approval is only for an entertainment permit that would allow a D.J., dancing, and live acoustic entertainment in conjunction with an existing restaurant and billiard hall Any change of intensity or type of entertainment shall require a modification to this permit. 2) The days and hours of operation for entertainment shall be limited to D J. and dancng Sunday through Thursday 8 00 p m to 10.00 p m. and Friday and Saturday 8 00 p m to 11 00 p m The acoustical entertainment is limited to Monday through Sunday from 4:00 p.m. to 7 00 p m The acoustical entertainment is limited to one non-amplified instrument and one singer. On occasions an additional person may accompany the singer Any expansion of days and/or hours shall requre modification to this permit 3) No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.090, shall be permitted. 4) Entertainment shall be conducted inside the budding ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-10 DRC2001- 00083 -RIPTIDE . January 9, 2002 Page 4 5) When entertainment is being conducted, doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. 6) Extenor noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB dunng the hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p m and 60 dB dunng the hours from 10 p.m to 7 a m 7) Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the pnmary use and not from a separate extenor entrance. Other ewts shall be for Fire Ewt Only." 8) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adtacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or rewcation of the permit. 9) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Budding Code, or any other City Ordinances. 10) This permit shall be renewed annually by the applicant per Muniapal • Code Section 5 12.115 11) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed secunty guard from a reputable security firm shall be regwred to be on the premises from 8 p m until the parking lot is cleared after the conclusion of any entertainment The guard shall be in "peace officer" attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the faality to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbances 12) This permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission in six months for review of compliance moth conditions of approval. 13) The applicant shall post and enforce employee parking only in parkng area directly adtacent to the residential development to the west. Fire Distnct/Budding 8 Safety Division 1) The maxmum number of occupants shall not exceed building and fire codes. The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the Citys Fire Prevention Umt Division 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. i ~` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-10 DRC2001- 00083 -RIPTIDE January 9, 2002 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' ATTEST Larry T. McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretaryof the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-vent AYES• COMMISSIONERS. NOES' COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r1 L.._J I \ to n U C~ J r ~, u January 4, 2004 Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Subject: Entertainment permit DRC2001-00083 - Riptide The purpose of this letter is to confirm our opposition for the proposed action to allow entertainment consisting of D. J., dancing, and live acoustical entertainment in conjunction with the existing bar and billiard hall. The operation of this type of business adjacent to a residential area just doesn't match what the city says that it would like Rancho Cucamonga to be as a community. Rancho Cucamonga is advertised as a "family values" type city and a good place to live. This type of activity is contrary to this goal. During this past year the uncontrolled noise and disturbances caused by the patron activity associated with this business has been very annoying. As homeowners we would like to be able to enjoy the privacy and quiet that one ordinarily expects to have when they buy a home. However, many evenings this it is not possible because of the activities going on in the parking lot during the hours of operation and after closing. This Includes lowed shouting, racing vehicle engines, squealing tires, beer bottles thrown over the wall, are all very disturbing. In the warm summer months, considerable activity is carried on with doors open, and patrons acting obnoxious out doors throughout operating hours. ~~7Y OF ~AIVL'NG ~ r ~; -~ILnONGA J ~ECE~~ fa AA/ p ~ ?O p? PANNING Z~~ ~-- • Although several ideas have been put fourth to mange the noise, and commotion in the parking lot, none have been implemented for any length of time. Most have not been implemented at all. An apparent, if not obvious defiance of the cities attempts to integrate this business into the neighborhood. Those of us that have to get up early in the morning to start our commute to work every day, would like to be able to get a good night's sleep. This means going to bed early and being able to sleep through the night without the disturbances that are constantly going on in the parking lot. We have made significant investments in our homes and we would like to be able to enjoy the full benefits of those investments. Also, we do not wish to suffer a loss of resale value because of the activities of this business. Lets' keep residential areas residential, and keep business areas for businesses. • Please note that city parks close at 10:00 pm to provide serenity to residents surrounding them. Why not uphold the city ordinances and provide everyone the same rights? Thank you once again for dealing with this very sensitive matter. Sincerely _ :~ /, _ Joe Fabis family 6611 Topaz Alta Loma, Ca 91701 T H E C I T V O F RANCflO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE. January 9, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Ruben Warren, Planning Technician SUBJECT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRCEP94-02 -COFFEE KLATCH - A compliance review of the Entertainment Permit for Coffee Klatch in the Specialty Commercial Distnct, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard -APN. 208-101-23. ABSTRACT The purpose of this heanng is to determine whether the business is operating in a manner consistent with the Entertainment Ordinance and complies with the modified conditions to the Entertainment Permit approved at the September 12, 2001, Planning Commission meeting. Staff recommends that conditions of Entertainment Permit 94-02 be further modified to require a secunty person when 80 patrons or more are present when live entertainment is offered BACKGROUND Last March, staff received a letter from an adtacent business owner descnbing nuisance problems such as loitering, fighting, "burning rubber" in the parking lot, and un-hygienic behavior from teenagers. Staff confirmed some of the nuisance problems with another adjacent business Based on the concerns and Entertainment Permit renewal request from Coffee Klatch, the City Planner determined a compliance heanng would be appropnate for the Entertainment Permit. On May 23, 2001, the Planning Commission conducted a public heanng and took public testimony from the applicant and the affected business owners. At the public heanng, Mr. Barba, the adjacent liquor storeowner, stated he must follow stnct rules from Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) because his business is a liquor store. He indicated those rules incude the prohibition of loitenng in the parking lot around his business. The Planning Commission concluded additional conditions were necessary to address the nuisance problems The Planning Commission modrFed Entertainment Permit 94-02 requinng an employee or secunty guard to be in the outdoor patio area when live entertainment is occurring and 50 or more patrons are present to monitor and discourage nuisance problems. The Planning Commission also placed another condition of approval requinng a compliance review in September 2001. Dunng the public heanng on September 12, 2001, Heather Perry, manager of the Coffee Klatch, objected to the condition requinng an employee or secunty guard when live entertainment is occumng with 50 or more patrons present She stated that the Coffee Klatch is a small business and is unable to afford extra personnel and therefore unable to currently offer live bands as they draw large crowds She suggested the root of the problems were onginally associated with alcohol, which is not sold at her establishment. She asked that the condition be removed The Planning Commission suggested the matter come before the Commission in three months Because the matter before the Commission did not include a request to change conditions, the City Planner offered that an amendment to conditions could be considered when the matter was returned. ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRCEP94-02 -COFFEE KLATCH January 9, 2002 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A Compatibility of Use. With the exception of the original concerns expressed by adjacent business owners of Thomas Winery Plaza, the use of Irve entertainment has been compatible with the surrounding environment The business is located at a mayor intersection with no residential areas in the immediate vicinity. B Adjacent Busness• Since the May 23, 2001, heanng, there have been no complaints of nwsance problems As a follow-up from the May heanng, staff visited Coffee Klatch and did not witness any potential problems Staff also spoke with the adjacent business owners of Thomas Winery Plaza who originally expressed concerns. They stated the nwsance problems have been rectified, as smaller crowds have been present. C. Police Response. The Police Call History for the site (8916 Foothill Boulevard) between May 2001 and August 2001 shows four calls with one cancellation. The three calls were directly or indirectly related to the Coffee Klatch. The calls include anon-injury accident between a vehicle or vehicles and a bicycle, a verbal disturbance, and a drunken individual who on numerous occasions had been asked to leave by the Coffee Klatch management According to police staff, the number of calls from Coffee Klatch is normal Most recently, no calls of disturbance have been reported (Exhibit "F"). D. Conclusion: Staff believes the condition requinng an employee to monitor the outdoor patio be modified and only necessary when 80 or more patrons are present when live music is offered. Any disturbance problems associated with live entertainment shall require the Entertainment Permit be brought before the Planning Commission for review CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all properties and tenants within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make amendments to the conditions of approval as noted above through approval of the attached Resolution of Approval. BB RWUs Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan and Patio Location Exhibit "C" -Interior Floor Plan Exhibit "D" -Resolution No. 01-49 Exhibit "E" -Resolution No. 94-60 Exhibit "F" -Call History Exhibit "G" -Planning Commission Minutes of September 12, 2001 Resolution Amending Entertainment Permit DRCEP94-02 M2 m Location Map _~, t ~ . ~~~ ' ,.r ~,+ ~ ~ .~ . ~:~ a ~ '~nm ~ " i"w;m. Exhibit "A" ~ 3 Z 0 m Site Plan IIp OZ Z s b u ~ ~ w ~O w C~~ ~ T T T T T m 1, N 4f ~ bl V V Vl~ N N _~ KlaFch u~T ~,,~~ K$ N ~ ~ N 1 r900 SF D-2 i.~o ~ as V1 -9r- n~ ~~ Grp ~ ~B C '~ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Exhibit "B" ~ m ~ •,~ _,~. ,..~SF &z i.aos~ e-a i..oos~ a+ +~oos~ e-s i.soo sv e~e P05TK PUVA H O r~ O i • Interior Floor Plan DQ~,r Seating M NOTE: There is no stage, bend and seating area ~rar~ depending on size of band. ~i m5 Exhibit "C" RESOLUTION NO. 01-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO 94-02, IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 20&101-23. A Rentals 1. On June 22, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No 94-60 and approved Entertainment Permit 94-60. 2. Following the receipt of a complaint on March 21, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed hearing on May 23, 2001, took public testimony, and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occured. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. . 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng on May 23, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a. On March 21, 2001, a complaint was received regarding nuisance problems mGuding loitering. b. Coffee Klatch is in Gose proximity t0 a liquor store and both businesses share the use of the parking area c. To provide compatibility of uses for both businesses, there is a need to define the use of the outdoor patio with live entertainment and to have monitonng of patrons outside so as to avoid potential nuisance problems 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the speGfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows: a. The conduct of the establishment and the granting of the modification to the Entertainment Permit would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare. b. The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner. c. The applicant has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in contunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. ~~Q Exhibit "D" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 01-49 EP 94-02 -COFFEE KLATCH May 23, 2001 Page 2 d The granting of the modification to the Entertainment Permit would not create a public nuisance e The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and gwet of the surrounding commercial center. f The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of matenal fact in the regwred application. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the modification of Entertainment Pertnit 94-02 subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Division 1) All conditions of approval contained in Resolution 94-60 shall apply. 2) An employee or a security guard from the shopping center shall be in the outdoor patio area when Iwe entertainment is occurting and 50 or more patrons are present to monitor the outside crowd and discourage patrons from creating nuisance problems. 3) This Entertainment Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission in September 2001. 5 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY 2001. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' ~ ' arty T. iel, Chairman ATTEST: Bred Bull~3dcretary~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May 2001, by the following vote-to-wk: AYES COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO m~ RESOLUTION NO. 94-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 94-02, TO OPERATE AND CONDUCT ENTERTAINMENT BY PROVIDING VARIOUS TYPES OF LIVE MUSIC FOR THE COFFEE KLATCH, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-101-23. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. On March 17, 1994, Cynthia and Mike Perry filed an application for the issuance of an Entertainment Permit (EP 94-02) described above in the title of thle Resolution. 3. On the 22nd day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. H. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae follows: 1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 22, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds ae follows: a. The application applies to property located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue on a lot presently improved with structures and parking areas which constitutes the Thomas Winery Plaza] and b. The property to the north of the subject site ie designated Office Professional and is presently vacant, the property to the south is designated Community Commercial, the property to the west ie vacant and the site of the proposed Smith's Food and Drug, and the property to the east is an existing commercial center] and c. The Coffee Klatch 1s a cappuccino bar serving coffee, espresso, and dessert. The proposal ie to provide musical entertainment on Thursdays from 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., Fridays and Saturdays from 8:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and possibly nightly during summer and holiday season and Sunday afternoons. ~~ Exhibit "E" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-60 EP 94-02 - COFFEE KLATCH June 22, 1994 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced June 22, 1994, public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morale, or welfare] and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner; and c. That the applicant has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisanee; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center; and f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified above in this Resolution ie exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, ae amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b(3) of the State CHQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the following conditions: Planninc Division 1) This approval is only for live music performances. Any change of intensity of entertainment shall require application for modification of this permit. 2) If the operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. 3) Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB during the hours of entertainment operation prior to 10:00 p.m. and 60 dB during the hours after 10:00 p.m. rnq ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-60 EP 94-02 - COFFEE KLATCH June 22, 1994 Page 3 4) Outdoor entertainment shall be limited in location to south or west of the still building and west of the dutch door on the adjacent business. An exhibit shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 5) Hours of operation for the entertainment use shall be Monday through Friday evenings from 7:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. and Saturdays and Sundays from noon to 1:00 s.m. 6) Thie permit shall be renewed annually per Municipal Code Section 5.12.115. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE 1994. OF THE CITI~ ~F RANCHO CUCAMONGA BYs Chairman ATTEST• L~ Hrad 11 , S e ry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Raneho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~~~ K S 7 r CALL HISTORY From 09/01/2001 Thru 12/17/2001 Date /Time Initial pll final call type =709/19/200Y'^18. 8t4~1' 91NF ~P~Y : ~'- ~" - P©+ ~ incident # location dispo report number ~' " 09123/2001 1744 18 459A PC459 AUDIBLE ALARM RC012660197 ~ 8916 FOOTHILL BL #D 's=,,.:< a, _ ~~ Cancelled 09l23/,2Q ~k17; 5 '. 59A ~Ea k ' , 11/1412001 10 39 03 AREACK AREACK ' ~ AREA CHECK REQUESTED RC013180103 8916 FOOTHILL BL ^~~' X, ~, Necessary Action Taken ~ 1 1@01~g07Y0937r39g P,; 597j ~ _„ F~ 5 - • ' 12109/2001 19 38 24 459A PC459 AUDIBLE ALARM RC013430192 • 8916 FOOTHILL BL #Ki I r:~ '"'~ " ` False Alarm ' 121d2d2 0;1rtl6:2f: 8 ,' _~ :;x:,~~r: S 3 d \cedlogsUogs2000 mdb Address Detail address select Page 1 of 1 Tuesday, December 18, 2001 s ~- • C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DCR2001-00262 - DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16239 consisting of 109 single-family lots on 20 15 acres of land in • the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victona Community Plan, located at the northeast comer of Baseline Road and Milliken Avenue-APN 227-691-01 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16239 and Victona Community Plan Amendment DRC2001-00263 Chainnan McNiel noted that Item C was being pulled to be continued Motion• Moved by Macias, seconded by Stewart, tamed 4-0-1 (Tolstoy absent) to adopt Items A and B on the Consent Calendar ..... PUBLIC HEARINGS D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16239 - DIVERSIFIEDPACIFIC - A request to subdivide 20 15 acres of land into 1091ots forthe purpose of single family home construction in the Low-Medium Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victona Community Plan, located at the northeast comer of Base Lme Road and Milliken Avenue -APN 227-691-01 Related files Development Review DRC2001-00262 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2001-00263 Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing There were no comments Motion• Moved by Mannenno, seconded by Stewart, to continue Development Review DRC2001-00262 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16239 to September 26, 2001 Motion tamed by the following vote• AYES• MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES NONE ABSENT. TOLSTOY -tamed .«... E. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 94-02 -COFFEE KLATCH - A compliance review of the Entertainment Permit for Coffee Klatch in the Specialty Commeraal Distnct, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard-APN 208-101-23. Ruben Warren, Planning Techniaan, presented the staff report Chairman McNiel opened the public heanng Heather Perry, Coffee Klatch, 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they are a good company that provides entertainment for the community. She said she had not been able to book very many Chnstian bands dunng the last three months because such bands have too big of a draw and they could not afford to put on extra people for secunty She commented that the Wild Grape is along-term tenant and has not complained and only two newer businesses have complained She asked that the Commission allow them to operate for three months under the onginally approved conditions because they do not have the money to hire the extra secunty She stated that they don't sell liquor and she felt the problems were related to liquor She said then: had not been any complaints pnor to this and they have been there eight years She observed that neither of the complaining businesses were present at tonight's hearing. She again asked to be able to provide entertainment under the old rules which did not require outdoor secunty Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 12, 2001 Exhtbrt "G" ~ ~'Z Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing Chairman McNiel noted that the Commission had added a condition m May that an employee or security guard be present outdoors when 50 or more patrons are present. Commissioner Stewart observed there have been no complaints since May, so she felt the cond~Uon has helped resolve some of the issues She thought the condition needs to be in place Commissioner Mannerino observed that there was not an application before the Commission to remove any conditions He felt that the applicant would have to submit a request to modify the conditions before the Commission could consider removing any conditions. Chairman McNiel suggested the matter come back before the Commission in another three months. Brad Buller, City Planner, indicated staff could bnng the matter back in three months with consideration for additional amendment to the conditions. He suggested they might consider raising the tnggering number for regwnng additional personnel. Motion Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, to determine that the Coffee Klatch is m compliance with the Entertainment Permit and that no additional conditions are necessary at this time Motion tamed by the following vote AYES MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT TOLSTOY -tamed ..... F. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00505-CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA- A request to amend the Very Low Residential Distnct lot development standards, and to amend the Hillside Development grading standards, to facilitate horse keeping. Related file: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2001-00549 Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report Chairman McNiel observed that the lot size had been reconfigured from a minimum lot width of 135 feet down to 100 feet. He asked if the side yard setbacks would remain the same Mr. Coleman responded that no changes are proposed to the current side yard setbacks of 10 and 15 feet Chairman McNiel indicated that he did not wish to see houses stacked side by side with a typical tract look Mr Coleman felt that by deepening the lot, developers would be encouraged to change their footprints Commissioner Stewart felt the amendment is necessary Motion Moved by Stewart, seconded by Mannerino, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00505 Motion tamed by the following vote• AYES MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES. NONE ABSENT' TOLSTOY - cartied ..:.. Planrnng Commission Minutes -3- ~\,~ September 12, 2001 RESOLUTION NO 02-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRCEP94-02, IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 208-101-23. A Rentals 1. On June 22, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No 94-60 and approved Entertainment Permit 94-02. 2 Following the receipt of a complaint on March 21, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on May 23, 2001, received public testimony, and concluded said heanng on that date with modifications being made to Entertainment Permit 94-02, by adoption of Resolution 01-49. 3. On September 12, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng to review the Entertainment Permit as conddioned in Resolution No 01-49 The Planning Commission received public testimony, and concluded said heanng on that date with no modifications being made to Entertainment Permit 94-02 other than another review to be conducted after a 3-month penod. 4. On January 9, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng to again review the Entertainment Permit as directed by the Commission on September 12, 2001. 5. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanngs on January 9, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. Coffee Klatch is in close proximity to a liquor store and both businesses share the use of the parking area b. To provide compatibtliry of uses for both businesses, there is a need to define the use of the outdoor patio with live entertainment and to have monitonng of patrons outside so as to avoid potential nuisance problems c. Disturbance problems have been rectified since the initial March 21, 2001, complaint ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-11 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRCEP94-02 -COFFEE KLATCH January 9, 2002 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a The conduct of the establishment and the granting of the modification to the Entertainment Permit would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare b The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner. c The applicant has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding 5 years. d. The granting of the modification to the Entertainment Permit would not create a public nwsance. e. The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and gwet of the surrounding commercial center. f The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the modification of Entertainment Permit 94-02 subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference Plannino Division 1) All conditions of approval contained in Resolution 94-GO shall apply with the conditions in Resolution 01-49 being modified 2) An additional employee or a security guard from the Coffee Klatch shall be on site when live entertainment is occurring and 80 or more patrons are present to monitor the outside crowd and discourage patrons from creating nwsance problems. 3) Any disturbance problems assoaated with Live Entertainment shall regwre the Entertainment Permit be brought before the Planning Commission for review 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certrfy to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. LanyT McNiel, Chairman ~\~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-11 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRCEP94-02 -COFFEE KLATCH January 9, 2002 Page 3 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS' LJ ~~~ C~ T H E C I T V O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 9, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Kirt A Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 26 7 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential Dlstnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay Dlstnct, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Dlstnct within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN. 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Related file Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Dlstnct within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Related file Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Project Density 13 8 dwelling units per acre B Surroi North South East West mdina Land Use and Zoninq - I-15 Freeway - Community Commercial - Medium Residential (8-14 (4-8 dwelling units per acre) - I-15 Freeway dwelling units per acre)/Low Medium Residential ITEMS N,0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 & DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST HOMES January 9, 2002 • Page 2 C General Plan Desionations Protect Site -Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - I-15 Freeway South - Community Commeraal East - Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)/Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre West - I-15 Freeway D Site Characteristics. The property is generally flat, sloping downward to the south and east. The site is currently vacant with native trees and grasses present. Eight existing single-family residences, located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site, are not a part of the proposed project E Parking Calculations Multi-Family/Condominwm Residential Type Number Parking Number of Number of of Use of Units Ratio Spaces Spaces Regwred Provided One Bedroom 158 1.50/unit 237 Two Bedroom Three Bedroom 188 22 1 80/und 2.00/unit 339 44 Guest Parking 0 25/unit 92 Total 712 719 ANALYSIS A. General The project is located within the Etnvanda Avenue Overlay Distract, which regwres a Conditional Use Permit to develop except for single-family homes The project density of 13 8 dwelling units per acre is essentially at the top of the density range for this zone, therefore, transition of density to adtoining single-family homes is critical. The Site Plan has been designed to create transitions through bwlding orientation and setbacks to the identified single-family residences. The protect includes a total of 41 apartment buildings comprised of four budding types In adddion, two recreation bwldings wrath one office/leasing budding are included in the proposed protect The proposed buildings fronting Etiwanda Avenue have enhanced elevations and the budding masses include both two-story and one-story elements to articulate the massing. There are 19 two-story apartment buildings proposed along the freeway corridor at the north and west protect perimeter The buildings are plotted to assist wrath the mitigation of freeway noise Single- story garage structures perform as a good buffer and low building mass transition along the south property line, adjacent to the commeraal property A substantial recreation/open space corridor is provided within the development, which will include both active and passive recreation faalities Active recreation uses include a community pool and spa, several tot lots, half court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, barbecue areas, and exercise faulities within the recreation building The . buildings will include a stucco firnsh, painted wood knee braces, ledge-stone battered walls, and a concrete flat the roof. The project perimeter will involve 6-foot high tubular steel fencing and split face masonry wall. Fenang along Etiwanda Avenue will include tubular steel fencng with decorative native stone pilasters K,o 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT . SUBTT16257 & DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST HOMES January 9, 2002 Page 3 B Design Rewew Committee The Committee (McNeil, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on November 20, and December 4, 2001 At the December 4, 2001, meeting, the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project, subject to the applicant's providing stone wainscot treatment on all sides of the bwldmgs fronting Etiwanda Avenue It should be noted that the applicant has provided the wainscot treatment to the front and side elevations, but not to the rear The applicant met with the City Planner on January 2, 2002, to consider other options to resolve the matter Action comments from the Design Review Committee have been attached for your convenience (Exhibit I) The City Planner will continue to work with the applicant and hopes to bring a recommended solution to the Planning Commission on the use of native rock on the bwldmgs faang Etiwanda Avenue C Gradino Rewew and Technical Review Committees The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on November 20, 2001 The Technical Rewew Committee reviewed the protect on November 21, 2001 Both Committees recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolutions of Approval D Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 Several mature trees exist throughout the prolect site The only other plant materials are annual and perennial weeds and grasses Several of the mature trees that occur on-site must be removed to allow for the proposed construction The trees are subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No 276 . The impact is not considered significant due to the protect design which includes planting numerous box size trees E Neiohbofiood Meetino A neighborhood meeting was held on November 20, 2001 Twelve people attended the meeting, which included property owners of the single-family residences, located on the inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the protect site The residents asked questions and raised cencems regarding traffic, access, drainage, maintaining asingle-family quality of life and neighborhood in the middle of an apartment protect, and the potential negative impacts to the property values of the single- famdy homes The developer presented the protect regarding site design, bwlding orientation, parking, access and landscaping to address several of the identified concerns The nearest bwlding to the L-shaped property is 32 feet from their common property line F. Environmental Assessment The Initial Study has been prepared Staff determined that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact through short-term air quality impacts during site preparation such as grading and egwpment exhaust Staff also determined that there may be noise impacts to future residents within the subtect development resulting from traffic along the I-15 freeway and Etiwanda Avenue, as well as biological impacts resulting from on-site tree removal A noise study was prepared which identified noise attenuation measures The protect design cleverly uses bwldmgs along the west boundary as the sound attenuation barrier, hence, no sound wall is necessary along the 115 Freeway Speaal sound attenuation design will be necessary for those units faang Etiwanda Avenue Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short-term air quality and predicted future noise impacts to a less than significant impact and trees are required to be replaced pursuant to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No 276 If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site PJ,03 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 & DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST HOMES January 9, 2002 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, Sf Brad Buller City Planner BB KC\Is Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C"- Tentative Tract Map 16257 Exhibit"D"- Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "G"- Elevations Exhibd "H" - Floor Plans Exhibit "I" -Design Review Committee Minutes, Dated November 20, and December 4, 2001 Exhibit "J" -Environmental Initial Study Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 N,o y _Z ~ LOCATI~ MAP S U BTT16257/DRC2001-00557 MILLER AVENUE V i ~sri a ~cLP,tay W 7 t W Q Q ~, D a 5 ~R 3 F W 292 ~}~a.r+wteK'~~ ttAs Protect Site All Parcels interstate 15 Fwy Q FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 0 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 4800 Feet SQGY~ Hea~-~' Ghu~ ~ -- ~ ~~ i ~~ !. ~~ cgs ~~ i- _- i i G I ~ - ~ ~:~~ - - I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °ay s_ ~ ~ 600 TYP r ~ , f ~ ~ ~ ~` ~I~ % ~ - ~ ~ FZr d I` T ° 1_ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ - ~ [JI:~~ •~ ~ DUI ~_ ~ii l ~ 3 - I~~I ~ ~ ~ / .~ _~.. _ .. ~' -j'~ 1~ ~- ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ /~~ -_ ~_ __ mil" ~~ t-~rr~~ ~~^~ ~- ~ - ~~.~' CD ~ ~ r , ~' - ,_~ ' i, ~ ~~, "Sk ~~~'s ~ I ~~r " _ / ~ C3p -'` , -~- Pte' . ~ _,C „- / _ ~;~ rP rf. _i,~,Y;~ =~•~'~ ~ ~ .~ ~'7. ~ 600' TYP _-_ - , - P G ~ l _ ~a I ~ ~' - ~ cT.~~~ f ~^ sk H u~.~ ~ _ _ ~ 1 = _~~__ _ r~~ ` yjl~' ~ i``~~r °.: Qom' - >'+ •i. __- ~ __' ~ _ -~~~~~ ~ ~ ~_ _ ' C.~ _ - _ 'z F ~,- _ oofl~i~vd.~ .~ ~ecific J~'ian' ~ '~ ,~ { _ ~~ -= ~~ w :. -- _- - - - -- ~~_ __°~° °---_ _ _~- 0. i a °~ W ~~ P ~Sa e~o ~ iy ~ O O W C 6 O ~ 3~ P V z~~ x ~ y e~, ; 9~ ' ~., Z i ~~g as~.t d°e~!, M ~~ IJ , ~ ~ ---- ---------- - _____________ _______ J~`~ 'i i I;° ~ i ,~ ~ _ ~ / ~f 3 / ~a~~ I~ ' ~ =°= ' ' ' '^~l ~ a ~f~ // ~ ~~~ a r ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ sag ~ ~ ~ ~ / l y „ a I v_ ~ 1+ 44 @@ t i i ~~ S .... ~s:; ~~~9i ife= S?3` ~3~ai I ~~ P.~~°~~%:%' i~ ~ a / p ~ I / ~Op°p ~~ qM 1~Y~? 9, _ _ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ae' J"'I" ~ ~ 5 - --_- I ~ r~ tiS nv >°aa ~ ~,J ~n ' ----~_-%j _ ___~_ z / ~ /~/ reg., ~~) . j l1\ 2 i~r-~ // 1~~..-. MWT41aWSIR9I ~~ ~ /~ _, /~/ ~ a1 ~ I ~, --~, )~F, ~ ~ ~ ~ s ' / ~~ :.yl 1 y H_ I~ ~a1w _~ ~x ms wvx ~~ ~i l~ ~ ~ w ruin v a`n a~~~e _'" ~ © _C ~~ ,•~ _%, .S duo^a zc''L~I ~.'. „~s,'Yi~ ~~i~~ r f~~+ ~. ~ `x=~,'~ '~ V 4~d~-~~ ~ ~ ~; -~_-:~] 4 tea. `~ 'r ~ ~~ :. ~ ~ # ~~ III .s (--c--~' ~ ;~Rd ~ h .. / S .Y ._ eib95 g_~ ~, " ~{ ~J~ `~ ?0'~\' \ l\Z~? t~ ,l, f ;. ~, ~~) ~ ~> \~ ~ a, [pFp ~~ x Y" RT ~fe LeY ` ____ Sb "-__-_--~~_ ~~ i ~ /~ ~\ +J V a~ lll1/I'lYj/\~'~_ Q ~C _~ .. i I C~ ~ ~ li ~~ .A + ~ (OIw~o ffl ;~ rn ue I w~ YI~O~rYYM ! {{i i ,~1~ .C~ ~> ;~ ~ , e\~` lac \~..~+2" i2j~' . -I ~ ~~y ,l Ellx~lldll•pIWT _ l ,'~ i i ~~ ~ -~ - i~ ~9,je ~ 5 ` SRI i aw ~ i ~ /.~' i ,I s i `V'' ~ F I s` i a o ~ /~~ =a J £°S I wg'e V~G egg €8~ r-- „~ .- ~ J ~ ~ lu i ~ U C___, 0.'i i Er W , [x~ 4 0 9~= ~l .-,~• j=- F 22 _ Qo€ ~F w~~ i i RS ~ ~~_ z w ~2. ~ g~ ~ I'° a d ix__ I ~ ~' 3 i ~ I .. h ~ 1 ~ x~ I, - ~~~ ~ mmi i pi'_ .m m~ ---- :: ~~8 W f~ ~ ' ll~ '~ AE ' Fy ~ ~' ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ i I ; , ~ M l~~ I• , ~~~i~ l _ _ _ I ~ ) i _ - - i ~~ O y ~ ~ I I i __ e { °' HDI-- ~~ i __ e.99___, r- <xv e>9>9 ri Bumma ~A DETAILED SITE PLAN ETIW A ~ ANDA PARTMENTS ,x~N~n94, APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW & FORECAST GROOP ''` n v TENTATIVE MAP N n nrolrwnoN awl.pmc MATN~aII IUMpIO CLCANONGA IAMp CONIANY LLC FII•[H•~• IbA l]VC CGRE11 pR1VQ I RAMCf10 NCANONG.\ U 911)0 ~~~ ""Y mxww. ~rD• FlIOME (1O91n1 nn iNl 19n)9eollx UNIT SUMMARY V PB Bt>b ~'"'•°^O1 ;]~ % TM SITE SUMMARY ~ R ~ I i. o Lnemll 1%urmi GROSS AREA M]AC oe fr ' ` r r.Nnm~ ny~ ]mAL UNm 1w Ou E a ~ ne r>Er pr~vsrtv uepwnc / ••• ~ it pym NEr OSABLEOPEH SPACR 36]AC 19C%) ~ PROOUCI'SUMMARY °~ nra' .PF 9r . o-.nun. ~_ ~. ~. o<m r~ pwrv roles N.uan~ nman+9a ..m n eunnma ~B~ v>~. .I~n 9u . ?mulew.wm ., G~ ~F~~ %~~ ~~ ~~ ~ . unNeRr _ ~r m9c ~ a i\ ti rwnnyua~ _ ~ _77 ar=~o.ra J ~vrvm r renr ow Bvapmo n eNmA1 u.n•ppmAe f+n \_memrm•x ~_ __-_ 9 •mn n .~.•••.p s ~.pe,. PARNINC SUMMARY ]vre AMI RFp111U9 roru. u >Nnwa ecxrAnaN a9vr ,mu.mmm ,wn.~ rmun~ . euu~mor ~. ~. •.. 1. w....e.W. ,u.e~,n9,9. o..o,m od..m r^ R~~I VI]NI ~A4Tg9~SP4m£~ / ~ vy. /~ b. ~e ,.~..~'.,.~... ,..,. / i ' ~ %~~ i ' ~~~% 1 ~ ~ ~~,>, ~~ ~/ i ~w~~l / ~cw44~''i j /;~ 54Q' ~ ' ~ ~ ~~~4 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ / o - ;1; ~ `~ j ~ // I ~ jj/ //• e~Iy~~1~Y, y 1 .r ,y .4 !iP II Irl = w ~) ~~ I i I . 1 ii y \ ^¢r °~ - P~ w II _ L , P Q{ ~ p, 1 I'' [[ p pg - 6~ ~ 1 ~ ° i a ~ l 7 I , - ~ i1., , 1 - ~ ~ 1 , , ~ -- 1 1 , 1 1 , , 14° ` _ . ' 1 ? ` ~ __ 'x 1. 1 j N ' - ` ~ £' ~ 9u 1 _T4 6 I - x18 r 1 n r 0 a xh a ~i9 x' d a ~ix fl': ,'• L 1 ' 41 - - t. ~a 11 r_ „~ I 'll ~ cc ~~ I i f _ ) SC L l I 1 ' I I_J ~ II -t-,riri P ~ ~ L ~ ~ lP i ~ 1 ' - - I 1 I ^' ' y\ , ~ 1 H ~ ` ~ I . y~ I rt __~ 11 _Cr__ , i _ ~_[(~ 1; II r- -' ' p E~ 8 ' e+~ it I_I~ __ ~ - F - I~'1 4 J 1 ~ II d J~ , Ir_ i J Z 1 _ r( . D Imo, II II { _ _ I ~ _ ~ ~ it 11 ~ ~- - _- ~ I I I I ~~ I r - ~ _ __ - ~ v -_ r.>h _ ,1 _ _ __"___ 1~ - _ _____ _ ~ -- ~ _____ _ ~- 1 __ Ir ~ 1 { ^ ~ ~ ~ 1 ,H 111 ~, ACANT) ~ ~I ~ 11 _ 111_ 1 ,I 11 ~II 1 ~~~ ~11 I ~R i~ ~~' ri v 11~~_ I i X12 I - m'J' --- ~~„ _1L~ ~ ~ _ __ i__ ~ _l ff ', i ~ i ~ ~ 4 1 n -- I II i ;i{I %rl ~Cl 1 I I~y,' e' __ CAMINO REAL II APARTMENTS rwnrnx cvculonxc cuuvw.u SAKES-REGIS GROUP TENTATIVE TRACT 16257, CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ~~- s>~ew SOUTHERLY PORTION ~ _~-~ A;11 J1 ~m1~P1 ~ -- - _ _ '~ ~'_',_tE ~~~.~ -~ ~~ ~ ~ L _-- -_-- '.-~ ~ _ -_ ~ -_ni ~1 _?_U ~5 _,'., __._~_-- __NOkµ'~f1N1SNp_~ `L73~~Rf1_u,,i'L ._~'. 1_ t! - ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ 4 'i ~~1-/ v D -, _ - \ ~i 5 .r4 • ~\ 4 ~ 1~ l ~ _ s i \ y 'a ~ 1 r' ~ q, .Q\a a - ~ ~ i ~'~ ~~~~ ~ . ` ~i~___Lr ~~ ~ `C ~~ ~ ~f~ ) "_~i \ - '= ~ 9 ~ ' ~~ _ u __ 6 ' '\~\u P ~ \\~~ ~ - \- a q, ~ ~. i \ \ '. ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~, ... ~~~ ~ \\ \\~\. \ ~ ~' _ ~ ` ~~~~ ~. ~~~. \ „\ ,~ ~~ ., 9 die ~f~~ ~ ~ ~~t Qq \ '~@ 3 ~es ~ N , o l0 ~ b i) a~ ~gs~ ~,,,~ '~ ao I za ' q° I 6 a ~, rx ~., ~, `~ a i C w li ~ F '~ ~- ~ a ~z d Z o '~ U ~ r ~ I ~ , C~2 eD I; ti F ~, d W I ~. F z w h x a .a ~; Nw ~ o W ~ ~ V ` ~ i °z ° ~ .I ~ ~ ~, ~a ~z~ .. ~~~ U3~ • i~ ~ -- _ ~. -1, ~,~ ~', it ~ ,o° "~i; EI ; ~, ~ 9~ ~°rr ~ I _vtncni n __ n. sci~u r _........-. Z O T-IA 'I~ -~------- --- ~'i ~ } _.__.~ .m.. -_= ~ ~~ I r ramert sm ) ~ ~~ I ~ I'' y ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~~~ ~ --__ _ CAMINO REAL II APARTMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 16257, CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ~~ bA w.xcxo cucu1oxcn cwwrnu SARES-REGIS GROUP DETAIL SHEET ~ - . _,-~„ V4f4Y1 U `FCtIRI C ~~+ I VICINI7'1' MAP xuwv r r N c ONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN TIWANDA APARTMENTS #2 v~ Iltl (tIIAMONGA GIIIOPNIA ~Itl CAST 1IOMES ~`!~ - - --J r - ,~ -,;~ F PLANT PALEffE O ETM'~\L~ ~RFdISfRFF'f 1RFi RM Gum O ~q~m nMFay ACC4T1i TREE ~~flu.Tw OJIEmOR OECmDOUR RIRFEf TREE O CIfRUSGROVETPEE %wtlaMMnvr CN~.rr %wacN Clrw Wepn Orin Trte V (~ uRmcFrr EVUtcaFERI rnEE O vmncALnttsErtTREE RnwoiurlemlF Cwry ...v PW /~--~ Cupeeu>MmpeMrenr bMlrnCry~m QMIR.D}RU\T(EIERCRFEN CANORY RRECP4N TREE l 1iALL VFAIICALRCPERN TPEFS CLwenvmm empbon Umpba Tin E1OI)RNrfRw+)Im'Maa pM lmark ® DECR)UOIA ROWEPP~O TREE © HydoMaarE nulrma LquWFmWrlamdlbG FFUmeM R.aM0.um O DECmLOUR FLONT.RpVO ACCFMTRFE ®Sluub FM OrauM mrernu LRe~v~urvy lnElo CnR AtNrlr O L4RIOHT fVFAGRFIIJTRkE ~ Pw Gnlanrm. A4Weuo WlnWllerolr CyepulTm N v O LANDSCAPE SUMMARY FEATURE LEGEND (~ •OF TRETS gEQlm1ED 1 Q $~h Aru L)pgr Aan ~°VAWOA°~MOPnFM ~.~G.7.WWMAw1 9F vmTloa y.aa M.no.v v.rF..WI.W.IWra ~~ loa arN..max m ,m ' Ysibr"""M""°°r..Fm,. ~..s lF.w)..-r+~.-.WV...aMl a 1?F sotl armemb.M m Im .~W.....-.........d._I..r-.A.~.+..-~WOwn.n q~ eos armvmbr lsc.m~ sax > o.,~rW~.~v.Fe..,~.ol„r,.WOW>..,1 ~i~ . oa.-.a+-m-.rre.~.w-a.un.~w~--...owa.n S~ c .wrr+i-.r..F-a-•r ws.~r...e..w.W.+e>n..s qF r r-... .-'~~Fr~.s a-FO...eF.1.....WO..lv.a a (~ ~. vrr.~.a.rv....~FWS...y 9y II r..W W.,.r.~a n orr.~r..... n 1-..~..^~r.rr.... n...W r..av.l-+~.orw.~,ev..l M IW ~W.e.wplWrbl ry.FA.FmniWawFN~1 n c..Farww"W..avr n.IW.Faa. F.wpm.R~.~l I. >u...n ~ L - I> rWUF.r..E (n~ J~F Ir, u1..NrMT11~. W.A>.I.I~WgR~F.Yr~Wa`>fWl I~ IFL1ll a u~.a.~v..> - sl w.-.-wry I ~~ ~ a Ne..FSrA r' a N.Pr.uw.F..vsva.l ryWr~v.>~y ~~ Y fY~~/drI V.Y m, a a...l.r..,.u.rq.,_.. P. u.,..~...._. WO..a.n -1 ^ a " ~ '~r.1.ar..W r..r...W r..r~r.av. e+r.~F+~~W ]~^R1 >, L ~' M wwTala MV wF.s.r-rWa. .WU. d.r.+.oq. w.~~a.p L'L JhIL' a n+-.r.~..r } IiYY. ~.IMF.M W.u~o~. n ~ Iv r a a T~r.sdrnr.~r..r 1JU`I y n ++r....e,r.rW...~rr. N a q.sr r n r.JrraRr...r a 0.• M ~rr..rrbrWr.r..wr v` V v F e s o e ~ n - a a a # II 11~ ETIWANDA AVE v oecA.F II ® a:h~=CranF •i.e vrANNw s ~r..,..~_..._ "?~ .~,~,.,..a,,.. SJ.NBIN.LNVdtl VQNVMLL3 O •••a~r~etaanie••• (~ Z _z s NAME OF APPLICAM RANCHO CUCAMONCA LAND CWIPA,W, LLC 106]0 CNIC CENFER DRR'E RANCHO NCAMONGA CA 91D0 PHONE (909)9B]T188 FAX (909)980.1169 ETIWA~ APARTMENTS ~ ~y_ _~ RANNO NC CAL60RNU FORECAST CRO -- - ..°.OULT COIF",A" It~n_T'Y (`Frl'F'FR FRONT ELEVATION Lli ,)11YV DIJIL V ~ ~ Ff' }I \N FRONT ELEVATION Z Il V FRONT ELEVATION CALI£ORN1A BUNGALOW "B TTLDBV . A" NAM[OF APPLICANT RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANU COMPANY, LLC 106)OCMC CENTER URIVE RANCHONGMONGA CA 91D0 PHONE (909)98]]]88 FA% (909) 9801169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS RANCHO NCAMONGA, CALIroRN1A FORECASPCROUP d~...__ LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION _Z O 6' NAME OF APPWCANT RANNONCAMONCA IANI9 COMPANY LLC 106]OCMCCENiE0. DRIVE RANCHO NCAMONGA, CA 91]JO PHONC (909)98)-)]88 FA% (909) 980.1169 FRONT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION CAL/FORMA BUNCALOIY "B TT DING B" RIGHT ELEVATION W~ ETIWA~jpA APARTMENTS ~ ~-• RANCHO NC GLD'ORNIA FORECASTG _Z D LEFT ELEVATION NAME Oi APPLICANT RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANG COMPANY, LLC i os)o n vlc L~ENreR oR9YE RANC{IO NCAMONGA, CA 9010 PHONE (909)98) ABP FAX (909) 98P 1169 FRONT ELEVATION CALIFORN/A BUNL..~~., `BUT_L~C" RIGHT ELEVATION ETIWANDA APARTMENTS d/~_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA FORECAST GROUP -~- -- ,.1 V' FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ••3UiL_ DINC D„ .we v.~. NAMF OF APPLICANT MNCNO NCAMONGA LAND COMPANY, LLC 106)0 CMC CENTER DRIVE RANNDNCAMONGA. Cn 91]l0 PHONE (909) %) )]BB FA% (9119) %0.1169 ETIW APARTMENTS ~ d~„_~ RANCHO COCA CALIFORNIA iORECASf CR LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION • S r 1Y-RtL10 ___. --~~ ii NAMEOFAPPIlCANT RANCHO CDCAMONCA IAND COMPANY, LLC 106A[MCCBNIFA DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91]]0 PHONE (9991M]-]]Bt PA% f9191 9161169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CAl1FORM A roarcASr cROUr i ~- --- - ~ 1 W.91 0 WepJy OrY1La rTl~n-f11RPO~.G c:l rdr„~• Icmn ~' 22~+so it 1' I l ~' t71fl.T ~~ ~. .Y, 1%~ ~Tr Nbvt.+il/a + P]P+v.M~a ~ .~"`~> ornce 71bIt~ ~ ~I _ _ _-~ r Fn~trrc a m nirr cr r xo re Nq V __ _ _ TR2Lljy II Isw.~ I i I I fiu 0 0 1'~N ~ 0 LC~rtN LT111iY ~.~ [~ 19."d l D' 1CNM ¢oFPfi C7Fl)G I II _-~ II --{--- ADULTCOMMiINITY N R NAME OF APPLICANT R.VVCCf10 CUCAMONGA LAND NMPANV, LLG 106]0 CNIC CENTCR ORNE MNCNO NCAMONGA CA 91b0 PHONE (9119198]'!188 FA% 1909) 980.1169 ETIWA APARTMENTS ~ ~_~ RANCHO CUC ALO'ORNIA iORECASf GRO 6yp~ o ~ly ~ry •dl ~ ~n r ~~~ ~ J ,~. ~, ~e q q ~' 4 ~ ~ a P ~ ° ° "- - "a ., , ~ e _, y~ 7C p \~~ o `~'{p~.F Zl e ° = J o o ~ i ~/~C ~ ,~. - - _ I .... y~ o p{~ 6~ ~ SC o ~ - ~. ..-•--1 ~ ~ttl ' , ~~ N,~ 2~ ~1~~i !~ i;i;; il;~~ R-Y ~ z w ~ ~ ~ a g p, ~ e u u ~ Qi ~ Z~Um ~^ Z ~~~om y ~g ~< ~~ Q' ~ ~u~'L~ 3 u~ coo" c~ ~~USW ~"~SU Z^ZO ~ 2C ~n~g~i wi$ Z D N N NAME OF APPUCANL RANCHO NCAMONGA LANO COMPANY, LLC (aaio rnlc cENrER OwvE MNCHO NCAMONGA, CA 9U)0 PHONE (909)981))88 FAX (909) 9861169 ~.,.~ ETIWA~A APARTMENTS ~ d~+-~ RANCHO NC _ FORECAST CROUP - ~ - z 0 N W NAME OF APPLICANT RANCHO CUCAMONGA GND COIIRANY LLC 106)0 CMC CENIE0. DRIVE RANCHO NGMONGA, CA 9010 PHONE 1909)9H) AH8 FAX (909) 9661169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS RMCNO CUCAAIONGA, CALIFORNU FORECAST CROUP C~ "B II J I DING A" z 0 N NAAff OF APPLIGNi RANNO CUCAMONGA LANG NAIPANY, LLC 106]0 CNIC CENfE0. D0.1VE RANCHO NCAMONOA CA 91 ]JO PNONE (909) 9P] ]]PP FAX (91191 9P0.1169 ETIW APARTMENTS RANCHO GDC CAL]FORNIA FORECAST CR "BiJILDIN('P B" ~~ _z O "BUILDINC7 B" NAME OF APPLICANT RANCHO CUCAMONGA LM'D COMPANY, LLC 106)0 CIVIC CENTER DW VE RANCHD NCAMONGh CA 91 ]JO PIIONE. (909198] 9188 FA% (909) 960.1169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS MNCNO CUCAMONGh CALIiORN1A iORECASI'CROUP ~~~~i ~,6 a!,~ l'` n1 ~ 0 2lP w H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~o~~ _~~~ 5~~a~ 3 z~ ~~~~€ w ~a Z -t~ NAME OF MPLICAM RANCHO CDCAMONCA LAND COMPANY, LLC 106]OCNIC CENTER DRNE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91 ]JO PHONE (9WI98i ]]88 FA% (909) 980.1169 "BUILDIN . " ETIWANDA APARTMENTS y/~_ RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA FORECAST GROUP NAMEOF APPLICAM RANCHO NCAMONCA LAND [ONPANl, LLC. 106]OCMCCENTE0. DRIVE RANCHO NCAMONGA, CA 91D0 PHONE (909) 96] ]]68 FA% (909) 960.1169 "B I DIN D 1NIT" ETIWAI~ APARTMEI3TS ~ ~~_ RANCHO NC ALO'ORNIA FORECAST GPO -~ ~- SECOND FLOOR LOFT LEVEL FIRST FLOOR ~ ! • Z ~Q N NAME DF APPLICANT` MNCNO CUCAMONCA LAND COMPANY, LLC 106]0 CMC CENTER DRNE RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CA 91JJ0 PHONE (909198) ]J88 FAX (909) 980.1169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS RANCHO CIICAMOVCA, CALIFORNIA FORFCASf CNOUP -- - • ~~•_~r, - - ' -- - - ~ ~_ ~ ! I _ _ !- ~-~ LOFT LEVEL r -_ ___ .4 SECOND FLOOR I L_ FIRST FLOOR "BUILDING D" FRONT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION O 5-CAR GARAGE W/ H C ACCESS ARAGFS NAME OF APPLIGNF RANNO NCAMONGA LAND COMPANY, LLC 106]0 CIVIC CENTER ORIVE RANNONCAMONGA, CA 91A0 PNONE (909) 961 P68 FA% (909) 9861169 4-CAR GARAGE W/MAINTENANCE ETIWA APARTMENTS ~ ~__~ RANCHO CUC CALIFORNIA FORCCASf CR ~~~ ---~- ~ . --- - '~,~, ,F% 1 I ----- ----- ,~ --------< ;~ // I ~" .~ .~ ~ j, ;~ , ; 1 1 __-_L - ~ r=~ i ~ ~ I ~ , 1 _ »; > ~ ~. ~ Z V I I ON~C D~L t~A 1N1~L ' I I I ~ ~ 1 I ~ I __ ' i I { I I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ I I ~~ 1 1 i 1 I ~ I I / , I i ~ ~ I I i ' 1 / I = I aG G ~ I ~ 6m ~. 1me~ ~e I I ~ I ~ ~ I 10-CAR GARAGE NAME OF APPLICAM RANCHO NCAMONGA LAND COMPANY, LLC 106]0 CMC CENIER DANE RANNONGMONGA, CA 9OJ0 PHONE (909198] )I88 FA% (909) 9!0.1169 GARGC ,S ~-r_ _ '" .J.__-_ _ L --^ -~ ~ I \ ~- I ~ i I I ~ 1 I 1 ~ \ ~ I I I ~ p t r _~~ I 1 ~ e she +me~ I I 5-CAR GARAGE ETIWANDA APARTMENTS Q/j~_ RANCxo NcAMxNCA, cAUroRnu FORECAST GROUP FRONT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 11:00 a.m. Kart Coury November 20, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT 16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to consUud 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medum Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay Distnd, and EUwanda Avenue Overlay Distnd within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of EUwanda north of Foothill Boulevard -APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etrvvanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the EUwanda Spedfic Plan, located on the west side of EUwanda north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 04, O5, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files: Tentative Trail SUBTT 16257, Vanance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Desion Parameters: The site is located between EUwanda Avenue and the I-15 Freeway, north of Foothill Boulevard. The lot is generally flat, sloping downward to the south and east The site is currently vacant Nnth native trees and grasses present Eight ewsting single-family residences, located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site, are not a part of the proposed projed. The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commerdal development. To the west and north is the I-15 Freeway. To the east across EUwanda Avenue, is the approved, but not yet built, Camino Real Apartments by this same developer. The projed density of 13.8 dwelling units per acxe is essentially at the top of the density range for this zone; therefore, transition of density to adjoining single-family homes is critipl. Site Plan has been designed to create transitions through building orientation and setbacks to the identified single- family residences. The projed will include a total of 41 apartment buildings comprised of four building types. In addition, there vwll also be two recreation buildings with one office/leasing building. The proposed buildings fronting Etrwanda Avenue have enhanced elevations and the building masses include both two-story and one-story elements to articulate the massing. There are 19 two- story apartment buildings proposed along the freeway corridor at the north and west projed penmeter. The buildings are intended to assist with the mitigation of freeway noise. Single-story garage structures perform as a good buffer and low building mass transition along the south property line, adiacent to the commercial properly. The proied will regwre a Variance to allow for the increase in the wall height up to 25 feet for sound attenuation along the I-15 Freeway. A substantial recreatioNopen space comdor ~s prowded within the development, which will indude both active and passive recreation facilities. Active recreation uses indude a community pool and spa; several tot lots, half court basketball, grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, barbecue areas, and exercise facilities within the recreation buildings. The proposed buildings will indude a stucco finish, painted wood corbels, wood siding, and a concrete flat Ule roof. The proied perimeter will involve 6-foot high tubular steel fencing and a masonry wall. Fencing along EUwanda Avenue will indude 6-foot high tubular steel fencng Hnth decorative masonry pilasters. ~~ ~ 11 N, 0 32 i DRC COMMENTS TT SUBTT16257 AND DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION November 20, 2001 Page 2 Regulations the Etiwanda Speafic Plan only allows the proposed density under the Optional Development Standards The key requirement is a minimum of 30 percent common open space. The project site's frontage, within 200 feet of the street centerline, is located within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District. The Overlay District is intended Ro protect and enhance the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings "The key requirement is for multi-family structures to be designed "to present an image of large single-family structures." River rods is encouraged as a design element A minimum of 15 recreational amenities is required based upon the total number of units. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Roof style and materials of the apartment buildings and garage structures should match. 2. Incorporate design elements of the proposed buildings into the architecture of the garage structures (i.e., gable roof element, stucco finish, painted wood corbels, wood siding, etc.). 3. All walls and fences shall be of decorative material. 4. Two of the proposed elevations should incorporate decorative materials other than wood siding to provide variation in the buildings. For example, Buildings B and D could indude stacked stone or real river rods treatment 5. The decorative perimeter fence along Etiwanda Avenue shall incorporate large decoraWe masonry pilasters (i e. real river rods or stacked stone) in its design. The plasters shall be developed at a minimum of 30 inches squared. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Vary the roll-up garage door designs to avoid monotony. Suggest pairing together doors Nnth same design. Staff Recommendation• Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project subject to the modifications as recommended above. Design Review Committee Action: Member Present: Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. iGrt Coury The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended the applicant make all major and policy issue revisions, with the exception of the fourth identfied major issue. The revision should incorporate decorative material other than wood siding and could inlude stalked stone or real river rodk treatrnent on the four bindings along Etiwanda Avenue as well as the leasing/lubhouse building. The applicant agreed to make the necessary revisions and bring balk the revised elevations and sample materials The Committee asked to see the project on Consent Calendar at the next Design Review Committee meeting. N t p ~3 CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Kart Coury December 4, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medwm Residential Distnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay Distnct, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distnct within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT 16257, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Design Review Committee Action• Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart Staff Planner. Nancy Fong for Kirt Coury The applicant was not present at the meeting with the revised colored elevations. The Committee reviewed the faxed 8 1/2 by 11 elevations showing the addition of stacked stones enrichment to Buildings B and C. The Committee recommended that the stacked stones be used as a wainscot for all sides of the buildings and to bnng the stacked stones up to the level of the cornice treatment and as marked on the faxed elevations If the applicant disagreed Nnth the Committee's recommendations, the project should be referred bads to Committee as a regular item for discussion prior to Planning Commission review. L.J U N,~ 3y •,' s ~T \.r _ ~~ 5~ City o/Rancho Cucamonga Plamm~p Dmsron (808) d77-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt rs the responslbrlrty of the applicant ro ensure that the application rs complete at fhe hme o/ submittal, City stag wdl not be evadable to perform work required to provide mrssrng mformabon Appl~cahon Number for the pro/ect to which this form pertains Pro/ect ~~~~-a.~p Tide Name 8 Address of pm/ect , °/~~ b~~ `O `"'BPS owner(s) (c~h7h C,.~( ~ev.1.°~ ~( ~DKcI~-a ~.c-aw~nh~ ~~ 913 D Name & Address of developer orpro/ed sponsor Contact Person & d N ~ ~/ , ~ l P Ste! o r~ 7 ~ ~ f old 6 c' Address (() ~( 7l~ ~ ~ ~'C ~~ r~c~ .. 1 h N~o 3s Name & Address of person propanng this form (d dr//erent from above) _J C1V~'^ ~ • ~eC ~ / ~ Z/ ~l ~G Telephone Number ~l t> j 7 Z l - $~~1 Information rnd~cated by astensk (') rs not required of non-constiucbon CUP~s unless othenwse requested by staff. 'i) Provide a full state (8-1/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which rndudes the probed slte, end indicate the sde boundanes ® 2) Provide a set o/color photographs which show representative thews info fhe sde /rom the north, south, east and west thews into and /rom the ste /rom the pnmary access points which serve the site, and ropresentebve views of srgnlficant /eatures from the site InGude a map showing /ocebon o/each photograph. 3) Pry/ect Location (descnbe) u,.;H„ ~~ ~T-rt,.ll ~ 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (attach add~6onal sheet d necassery) Za7- zr b~~r (~z9 .~v9 l o/D, o2D oaS o/7 ~~3) '5) Gross Site Area (adsq ft )' ~ 6 - 7 AC ~°S ~5) Net Srte Area (total sde srze minus area o/ public streets 8 proposed dedications) Zd , 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the protect site (attach additional sheet rf necessary• N ~~ ~ 8)lnclude a description o/all pennrts which will be necessary from the Crty o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to /ully implement the pro/ect T `` / C U `/A~~hvt? ~ ~ji~d•nQc f ~u I~~K~ 9)Descnbe the physical setting of the sde as d exists be/ore the protect including rnfonnabon on topography, sort stabrlrly, plants and animals, mature trees, trerls and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on sde (mdudmg age and condrhon) and fhe use o/the structures Attach photographs ofsrgnrficant features described In addrhon, site all sources o/rnformaGon (~ e, geological and/or hydrologic studies, broGc and archeological surveys, tretfic studies) S 10)Descnbe the known culture/ and/or historical aspects of the sde Sde all sources o/rnformabon (books, published reports and ore/ history) •-u 6~'e. s N-o3~ 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, including rnfomia6on on plants and animals and any cutturel, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commerwal, etc ), intensity o/land use (one-tem~ty, apertrnent houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yeN, etc ) ~7r G.~.J~~ GsaQ ~uv~ ~v ~ fit ~nGv ~~/ Cn-/d-~c° Q yrs'fA l,~i~ A10C.i ( JI-~ A~rX '-Crl -O' ~6Y \~(°r ~~~ ~ 14)Will the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general eras o/the pro/ect7 11)Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now allect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect nTnrtCRlr ^ARS 12) Describe the proposed plo/act m defad This should pmvrde an adequate descnpbon of the site m temps of ultimate use which wdl result from the proposed pro/act Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the enbc~pated completion of each increment Attach addrbona/ sheet(s) d necessary L._-{,: ~,.n,..~~UiJ. ~I,.t'.kh~n...l.µ,Fla~.cn~ .t~Scru_r y,P~,.r ~--tl ISf 5) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, including source and amount How will these Horse levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of sound proofing are pmposed7 I I I 'i6) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees ~ ~~~~ T ~ ~,~~ ,I ~.~ SL, J ~r°a~S -- f I I I ~) Indicate any bodes o/water (mdudmg domestic water suppkes) mto which the site drams . ~ .`{ ~~ l y) Indicate expeded amount of water usage (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For lurttier danficabon, please contact I the Cucamonga County Water Drstnd at 987-2591. `a Residential (ga4day) I y S, 2 o J Peak use (gal/Day) II b CommeraaUlnd (gal/day/ac) Peek use (`gaU/miNec) +)lndicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank v Sewer l1 septic tanks are proposed, attach j percolation tests Il discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For lurther clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnd at 987- j 2591 a Residenbal (gaUday) 7 ~'J D D ~ ~b Commeraal/!nd (gal/day/ac) .I RE ~JDENTIAL PROJECTS: 2 ~ iNumber of res~denbal units I " Detached (md~cate range of parcel sizes, minimum /ot size and maximum lot 'size ' ,' tJ,o ~ Attached pndreate whether ands an; rental or /or sale ands) 3 6 ~ 1 D~ p(~u ~ U 1~~ 21)Anbcrpated range of sale prices and/or rents Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (permonfh) $ H v ,~ ro $ l2 75- 22) Specdy number o/ bedrooms by and type _ 1st ~~~:t l ~3d ~13~:C~ ~4 ~ Uwe Z Z Q~ Z ~A-'C~ '~C~ LiA:t 3 ~g ~ -vR~t~ 23) Indicate enbcrpated household srze by and tYPe 24)Ind~cate the expelled numbero/school children who will be rosrdmg wrthrn the pro/ed~ Goofed the appropdafe School Drstncts as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary b Jumor High c SenrorHigh COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INST/TUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type o/use(s) and ma/or /uncbon(s) of commeraal, mdustnal uses 26) Total Moor area o/commemra/, mdustriel, or tYPe by 1v 1 `' ...1v _ .... ....,.._~.~. ~~...,.....nn, n,,rcn.unrrr... .. n.n .. ,n.. n_....c 27) Indicate hours of operebon 28) Numberof Total employees Maximum Shdt Time of Maximum Shdt 29)Prowde breakdown o/anbapatedtob classrficahons, rn of hire for each classification (attach addrbonal sheet d 30J Eshmahon of the City '31 J For commercial end venfied through the ALL PROJECTS of workers to be Aired that foal uses ~ Coast Av and salary ranges, as well as an rndicabon of the rate reside rn the type and amou f o/arrpollution missions (Data should be nd, of (818J 5 2-6283) 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and fi cronhol agenpes serving the pmlect been contacted to determine their abdrty to provide adequate service to the proposed p ectl l(so, please rnd~cate therrresponse N,o yl rrnr nnrnnnrq~ClnICllFlll]MC1r'(11INTFR\IAIITCTf11 UIPII'irnn Paoe 7 In the known history o(this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ 3)Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCt3~s, rsdioachve substances, pesdades and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o/ any of the above Please list the materials and describe them use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known Nfj f f i ?4)Will the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge o/ hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not I~mited to those examples listed above9 If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method o/ disposal The locahon of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, sha// 6e ~ shown and labeled on the appl~cahon plans I ~l "~ i I ftreby cerhly that the statementslumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and mformabon rogwred (oradequate e Siluahon of this pro/ect to the best o/ my abddy, that the facts, statements, and inlonnahon presented are true and coned tot he best c my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that addrt~onal in/onnabon may be required to be submitted before an adequate e ~duahon can be made by the City of Rancho C°---"'^^^ C . 'e ~ 0 Signature - ~ Title .I ,I /'f1 ~..~ :' N, ~ `~Z City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: DRC 2001-00557 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map No 16257, DRC 2001-00567 and DRC 2001-0566 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 2001- 00557-The protect is the development and design review of plans for Tentative Tract Map No. 16257, and the construction of 368 multi-family units m buildings ranging from one to three stories in height The site is approximately 26.7 acres m the Medium Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan The protect also requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Tree Removal Permit. The protect site is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract All proposed developments within the overlay distract are subtect to the issuance of a CUP with the exception of single-family residences The Tree Removal Permit will allow the removal of onsite trees that meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size criteria for heritage trees Currently there are three single-family residences onsite The proposed protect includes the removal of these residences. The site is located southeast of the elevated I-15 Freeway, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard and immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue (APN Nos.227-21-003, 004, 005, 009, 010, 017, 020 and 029) 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Forecast Corporation 10670 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 6. Zoning: Medium Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is bordered on the west and north by the I-15 Freeway The freeway is elevated through this section and runs southwest to northeast at an approximate 45° angle to the site The area south of the site is vacant followed by a realty office, a liquor store, single-family residences and a church (located near the southwest corner of the site). The site surrounds an existing neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences. These are not a part of the protect and will remain in place The protect includes a perimeter wall around the existing residents There are three single-family residences that occur onsite that will be removed to allow for site development The westernmost portion of the site is currently clear of residential structures and will allow full access to the northern/southern portion of the site N,~ y3 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kirt Coury Senior Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required State Water Resources Control Board - General Construction Activities Storm Water Runoff Permit ~J,~ ~-ly ~J r`J Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 The environmental factors checked below would be potentlally affected by this pro)ect, Involving at least one Impact that Is "potentlally Significant Impact," "potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or 'Less Than Slgnlflcant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Transportation/Circulation ()Land Use and Planning (/) Biological Resources (/) Public Services ()Population and Housing Ener and Mineral Resources (/) Utilities and Service Systems (/) Geological Problems ~~) Ha ards (/) Aesthetics (/) Water (/) Noise ()Cultural Resources (/) Air Quality / Mandato Fmdin s of Si niticance (/) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wilt not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed• Natalie P. Patty Contract Environmental Anal st December 18, 2001 N,o ys Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all °Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identrfied. Potentlalty Sigmficam Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pmant~elly Impaq unless Less rnan Significant MpigaOOn Sgnifirant No Im act Inco ratetl Im eIX I act 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (~) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (~) policies adopted by agencies with turisdiction over the protect c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (~) vianity~ d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (~) established community? Comments: a-b) The protect site is located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and is bordered on the west/northwest by the I-15 within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area The protect site is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distrct and therefore is subtect to a CUP and all special design requirements contained in Part II, Chapter 5, Section .304 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The site is within the Medium Residential District (8 to 14 dwelling units per area). The applicant has proposed a tract map showing 13 8 dwelling units per acre on a net site area of 26.7 acres No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no impacts will result from the protect. c-d) The nearest residence is located 40 feet from a proposed building with a proposed height of 32 feet Standard two-story homes have heights ranging from 25 to 35 feet. The proposed development will be compatible with existing residences in the vicinity as the building are sufficiently setback from the existing residences and do not exceed the maximum height requirements of a two-story single-family home. Potentially Sign~firant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantullr unau ine~ Significant MNgatlon Significant No I p Inco etetl I q I cl 2. POPl1LAT1ON AND HOUSNCs Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population protections O O O (~) ~1, o y~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantully Impact unlasa Less roan Significant Mitigation Sgnificant No Im act Inca mteE Im C Im h b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (r) directly or indirectly (e g ,through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () (~) ( ) housing Comments: a-b) The protect includes the construction of 368 apartments on approximately 26 7 acres of land designated as Medium Residential (8 to 14 dwelling units per area) located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 100 feet north of Foothill Boulevard No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed. Therefore, the protect will not result in a change in population protections The proposed protect will not require the expansion of any mator infrastructure as the area surrounding the site is development with scattered single-family residences, with commercial development along Foothill Boulevard c) The protect site includes three existing single-family residences These residences will be removed to allow site development The site surrounds an existing neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences These eight residences are not apart of the protect and will remain in place The three residential structures that occur onsite will be removed and replaced with 368 dwelling units The impact is considered less than significant Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Parentally Impact unleaa Lass roan Sign~ficanl Mrtigetion Significant No Im m Into araC 1 d Im act 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving a) Fault ruptures ( ) () () (r) b) Seismic ground shakings ( ) () (r) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions ( ) () (~) ( ) d) Seiche hazards () () () (~) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (r) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil O (r) O ( ) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (~) h) Expansive soils () () () (~) N,o y~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Potenllally $ignificeni Impep Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pdentalry unless Than Sign~ficanl Mingaiion $ignrfirant No I C Ineo a1aC I C I ecl i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (~) Comments: a-b) No known faults pass through the site, and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 3 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 8 miles north. The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude (M„,) 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7.5 earthquakes is 9 0 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is 11.5 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the City grading standards and the Unrform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signficant c) In the absence of shallow groundwater, the protect site is not considered susceptible to soil liquefaction d) The 26.7-acre site is not located near a body of water. Therefore the proposed development will not expose people to a seiche hazard e) The site is relatively flat, therefore there is no danger of landslides or mudflows. Grading will be minimal and will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f) Based on a Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared for the site by Converse Consultants in August 2001, the protect site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the findings and conclusions presented in the report are considered in the development of the site As discussed in the report, the upper three to four feet of alluvial soils are not considered suitable for supporting structures or additional fills However, typically, during grading, these soils can be over excavated and compacted to meet or exceed foundation requirements. The following mitigation measures, as contained in the report, will ensure impacts to development of the site are less than significant. 1. Site grading shall include removal and recompaction of surface soils. Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineer in a final geotechnical report. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits for the project, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechnical report. g/h) Based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Converse Consultants in August 2001, two representative samples from the top layer of N,o y~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 alluvial deposit were tested to evaluate expansion index (EI) m accordance with the Uniform Bwldmg Code (UBC, 1997) Standard 18-2 The value of the measured EI is 0 This value of EI indicates that the site soils have very low expansion potential As discussed in the report, the average shrinkage factor for the upper five feet of alluvial soils is estimated to be 2 to 16 percent Subsidence will depend on the construction methods including type of egwpment utilized For estimation purposes, ground subsidence may be taken as 0 20 feet Subsidence may occur in the City relatroe to groundwater withdrawals, if groundwater drawn down is done at varying rates m the Cucamonga groundwater basin However, to date this phenomenon has not occurred anywhere m the City and is unlikely to occur due to the consistent groundwater management practices of the various water agencies. Therefore, this impact is considered to be less than significant ~1 LJ Soil type at the site and in the vicinity is Tufunga association (Tv6) The Tufunga series consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils formed on alluvial fans m granitic alluvium Soils are present at slopes of zero to nine percent m elevations ranging from 1,000 to 2,000 feet. Vegetation present with these soils is thin strands of chamise, some large sagebrush, and annual grasses Runoff is slow to very slow The hazard of water erosion is slight, but the sod will blow if left unprotected The hazard of soil blowing is moderate to high on bare soil The City's General Plan indicates that most soil types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature. The site contains no unique geologic or physical features Potenimlly 9gn~fiwni Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pafamially u~~s :nay Sigmhaent Mmgaoon Spnifiram No Im ecl Inca algid Im ct Im ecl 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () (~) () ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (~) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () (~) () ( ) of surface water quality (e g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (~) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (r) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (~) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability ~lo ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Potentially SigndKant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Putanliallr a %s T a~ Significant Mrt~gatlon Significant No 1 ad Inco ateC 1 C I C g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (r) I) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (r) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a-b) Based on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM, 1984) prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the protect site is located within a "Flood Hazard Zone C." This zone is defined by FEMA as an area of minimal flooding As described in the Preliminary Drainage Study prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates the protect site drams southerly to Foothill Boulevard, through the Foothill Market Place, and ultimately to the Day Creek Channel. The City's Master Plan of Drainage proposed to redirect this area easterly to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Channel Interim conditions do not allow additional flows to the facility until downstream regional facilities are completed In addition, the property is not physically capable of draining to the basin A Final Drainage Report prepared for Tract 15711(located north of the protect site) in September 1997, provides for the redirection of the undeveloped runoff from this area, with mitigation detention occurring in Basin No. 6 to account for this increased undeveloped flow The report suggests onsite detention of the incremental developed runoff from this area to occur as a potential option The following mitigation measure shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits 3. The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how stormwater will be conveyed across the site and directed into the City's storm drain system. c-e) Since grading onsite will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) The protect will also require a General Construction Activity Storm Water Runoff Permit from the SWRCB. Both the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or stormwater conveyance channels BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season. The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant: 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. LJ N , o SD Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the protect by the Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP will make this impact less than significant f-i) The protect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge Additionally, groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings (maximum explored depth of 50 feet) taken for the preparation of the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, prepared by Converse Consultants. Based on available information depth to groundwater is greater than 400 feet below the protect site I~ LJ Potentially Signifiwm Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pgemully Impact unless Less roan Sgnihcant MM1igabon Sgnihcem No Im ecM Inco aced Im ed 1 en 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal• a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (~) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () (~) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (~) cause any change in climate d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (~) Comments: a) The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distract, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects. The criteria pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO,), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o). Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1). The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6'" edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model In order to reflect the residential nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of light passenger vehicles and decrease the number of medium and heavy-duty diesel trucks The proposed protect operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of signrficance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contribution to regional emission of criteria pollutants rJ,o s\ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds dunng grading activities for PM,o and NOx, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NO„ Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented During grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) wdl be generated Additionally, painting activities wdl mcrease ROG levels The model simulates all of the units being painted at the same time (worst case) and shows that combined ROG dunng construction to exceed the 75 pounds per day threshold by 1.68 pounds However, it is likely that pamtmg actiwties wdl be spaced out and wdl not occur at the same time If pamtmg activities do occur simultaneously Mitigation Measure No 11 will ensure emissions are below SCAQMD thresholds And since, there are existing residential units within the vicinity of the sde, and since the region is ninon-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust will be mitigated by the following measures 5. Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of 80 days. 6. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7. Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 8. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 9. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. During operation exhaust emissions from trucks and employees traveling to the site wdl mcrease CO levels m the area. As shown m Table 2, operation activities at the site will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Based on a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Kunzman Assoaates m October 2001, the protect will generate approximately 2,466 daily taps Total AM peak hour trips would be approximately 139 and PM peak hour taps would be 169, with a continued LOS D capacity or better at intersections m the vicinity Traffic associated with the protect was protected to occur m the area as the area is designated Medium Residential and is expected to generate related traffic taps Emissions associated with these vehicle taps are below SCAQMD thresholds (Table 2). N, 0 52 ~1 L~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 11 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary Pounds er Da Source ROG NO, CO PM,p Unmet Met Unmet. Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Demolition - - - - - - 16.80 16 80 Gradm 4 67 4 67 53.22 50 56 - - 25 36 10 99 Worker Tri s 1 09 1 09 1 54 1 54 2 91 2 91 0 29 0.29 Stationa E w 0 34 0 34 0.27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E ui 3 12 2 96 28.80 27 36 - - 2 23 2 12 Arch Coatin s 69.72 66 23 - - - - - - As halt 1.70 1 62 - - - - - - Totals 8D.64 76.68 83.83 79.73 2.91 2 91 44 70 13 42 SCAOMDThres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si mficance Yes Yes No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G EXISTING Operations Emissions (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet. Met Unmet Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet Met Area Source 0 06 0 00 0.81 0 00 0 32 0 00 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 10.16 10 16 20 29 20 29 90.46 90 46 5.16 5 16 Totals 10 22 10 16 21.10 20 29 90 78 90 46 5 16 5 16 SCAOMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si mficance No No No No No No No No b) During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO^ and PM,o levels in the area The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to existing residential units located a minimum of 40 feet from proposed construction activities, are at less than sigrnficant levels. 10. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 11. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 12. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. N,o S3 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 c-d) The proposed protect is the construction of 368 apartment units on a 26 7-acre lot with demolition of three existing residential units in accordance with the City code. The end use of the proposed protect, Medwm residential, will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or obtectionable odors Potentally Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pulent~Blly u~°> ~ Then Signifirant MNgation Sigmfieent No I et Inco eteG I C I eq 6. TRANSPORTATIOWCIRCULATION. Would the proposal result m a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () (~) ( ) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g , () () ( ) (~) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g ,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () ( ) (~) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () ( ) (~) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? () () ( ) (~) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () ( ) (~) alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rail or air traffic impacts () () ( ) (~) Comments: a) A traffic study was prepared for the protect by Kunzman Associates in October 2001 The study contains documentation of existing traffic conditions, traffic generated by the protect, distribution of the protect traffic to roads outside the protect, and an analysis of future traffic conditions The following is a summary of the traffic study prepared for the protect Roadways that will be utilized by the development include Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue Currently the protect site is vacant with the exception of three single-family residences that generate minimal traffic Existing intersections in the vicinity of the site currently operate at Level of Service (LOS) D capacity or better. Once constructed, the protect would generate approximately 2,466 daily trips Total AM peak hour trips would be approximately 139 and PM peak hour trips would be 169, with a continued LOS D capacity or better at intersections in the vicinity. These traffic generation levels are below the San Bernardino County Association of Governments threshold of 250 peak hour trips to require a Congestion Management Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (CMPlTIA) The following mitigation measures contained in the traffic study will ensure impacts to traffic and roads in the vicinity are at less than significant levels• r-1 N , o sy Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 13. Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking and controlling roadway access. 14. Construct all streets internal to the project to full ultimate cross-sections as adjacent development occurs. 15. Construct all streets bordering the project to ultimate half-section widths in conjunction with development. 16. Landscape planting and signs should be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility. 17. Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adjacent arterials. The applicant will be responsible for paying the City traffic impact fees and improving the project's frontage along Etiwanda Boulevard. The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the project's fair share of roadway improvements as identrfied by the City Engineer. b-c) Project design will not result in the creation of hazardous traffic conditions or create dangerous intersections The proposed project includes two full access points from Foothill Boulevard The southernmost access point is the main gated entrance and includes a 22-foot entrance and a 20-foot exit, with an eight-foot island separating the two The second gated entrance is located approximately 700 feet north of the main entrance and includes both a 20-foot entrance and exit, with an eight-foot island separating the two Both entrances will provide adequate points of ingress/egress and are accessible by emergency vehicles d) The proposed project must provide a total of 712 parking spaces. The site plan includes 719 parking spaces e-f) The new facility will not cause a hazard or barner to pedestrians or cyclists because adequate points of ingress/egress have been provided and there is adequate parking along streets No bus turnout has been provided. g) Located approximately seven miles northeast of Ontano Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Uness Than Significant Mitigation Spnificam No 1 p Incror eta0 Im p Im C 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result ~n impacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to. plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) N , o SS Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Potenpelly Sigmfioam Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potemially u~ u m~ 9gnifipm A4hgeoon Sgn~ficant No Im en In led Im n Im n b) Locally designated species (e g ,heritage trees, () () (~) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () () (r) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.) d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (~) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corndors~ () () () (~) Comments: a) The site and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997. The 26 7-acre site contains three residential units within the easternmost area and a vineyard within the westernmost area The site is mostly vegetated with non-native grasses, a vineyard, and windrows of eucalyptus trees. Past agricultural and residential development has eliminated native vegetation at this site. b-c) According to the Arbonst Report prepared by Jim Borer, Certified Arbonst for the protect site on September 20, 2001, a total of 86 trees on site meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size criteria for heritage trees. There are 72 eucalyptus of various specimens and types, ten Italian cypress, one fan palm, one fruitless mulberry, and two California peppers In general the eucalyptus trees are quite mature and are in declining condition with 13 dead specimens Many of the other specimens are under going structural decline One eucalyptus tree is under attack from an insect that has caused it to defoliate and therefore decline The eucalyptus trees vary in condition between extremely mature specimens and smaller specimens that have grown underneath the canopies of the larger trees Trees in both categories are in decline Based on the proposed site development plan that calls for mass grading operations and widening of the west side of Etiwanda Avenue frontage, all of the existing specimen trees on site are expected to be affected Up to 75 of the 86 trees on site must be removed to allow for the proposed grading to accommodate construction. As stated in the report, several of the species are candidates for relocation Ornamental trees onsite, including one fan palm and 10 Italian cypress trees are viable candidates for relocation and preservation onsite However none of these 11 trees are individually mature or distinct in either form or character and it would not be considered a significant impact if the trees were removed. The applicant has applied for the necessary Tree Removal Permit and has paid all associated fees The impact is not considered significant as a majority of the trees are in declining condition and the protect design indicates that they will be replaced with 120, 36-inch box trees, 120, 24-inch box trees, and 962, 15-gallon trees for a total of 1,202 new trees onsite N t 0 5lP .~ I Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site e) The I-15 Freeway borders the site along the west and northwest The site is immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard Scattered single-family residences occur near and on the site This development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. Poianaally Sgnificent i Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polant~allr Impaq unlaaa Less ,nan Signifipnl Mmgaoon Signifiwm No Im ^ Into mlatl Im act 1 act 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposaP a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation O O O (r) plans ,i b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (r) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (~) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the Statev Comments f a-b) The protect will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy I conservation yl I I c) The protect site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value 1 and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization Potentwlly Signitcanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources- Polamialy Impart unleaa Lass Than Sigmfiwnt Mibgefion Significam No Im ect IncO orelatl Im d Im aCl 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (~) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to. oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (r) response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (r) health hazard ~, ~ ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Polaniielly Sigmhwnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pulanbally a °a : Than Significant MNgatron Signihcant No 1 act Into alaG Im ect I ed d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (r) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (~) brush, grass, or trees Comments: a) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, or hazardous wastes were observed during a site visit. Several piles of non-hazardous debris were observed onsite and will be removed prior to grading There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. Past and current uses at and near the site include vineyard and residential development Demolition of residential structures shall be done in accordance with applicable City regulations The proposed prolect will not expose people or the environment to hazardous materials b) Two 50-foot driveways along Etiwanda Avenue will provide adequate access for emergency vehicles for the 26 7-acre site Fire hose locations will be approved per the Fire Department All terminating streets on-site provide appropriate turn radii for emergency vehicles d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils was observed onsite There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site e) Development of the sites will remove dry vegetation and continued development of the area will decrease the potential of fire within the vicinity The site is not located in a brush/wildland fire hazard area Polenhally Sgnifiwnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources- Potant~ally a °au Tn,~ Significant Mitgauon Significant Na I ci Intro atetl I C I acl 10. NOISE. Wdl the proposal result ~n: a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (~) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () (~) () ( ) Comments: a) The proposed prolect consists of 368 units in four building ranging in height between one and three stories The single and two-story buildings will house conventional apartments, while the building with three stories will include loft style apartments on the third floor. The prolect would increase noise levels on-site and in the vicinity because the site is currently vacant The site surrounds an existing N,o 5a Irntial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences that are not a part of the protect, and that will remain in place Construction activities are short-term and related elevated noise levels wdl cease once construction is complete. Implementation of the City's standard regulations on construction noise wdl ensure impacts to these residential urnts are at less than significant levels These include limiting hours of construction to day-time hours Monday through Friday Protect-related increases in noise associated with developing a vacant site with 368 multi-family units will be consistent with the City's General Plan Noise Element for multi-family protects The protect is not anticipated to generate other than residential noise (i e., children playing, vehicles entering and exiting, landscape maintenance, etc.) Construction noise can be mitigated through adherence to the City's regwrements for restricting noise including delimiting the hours and days when construction can occur Also the placement of stockpile areas and equipment storage away from the existing residences adtacent to the protect site These conditions of protect approval are adequate so that no additional mitigation measures are regwred. b) The 368 apartment units will be sited immediately east of the elevated I-15 freeway and west of Etiwanda Avenue Traffic along freeways and highways can be a significant source of noise The Ciry's General Plan indicates noise levels exceeding 65 dBA along the 115 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue The protect site is located 550 feet from Foothill Boulevard which is also subtect to noise levels exceeding 65 dBA Environmental noise is normally measured using a special frequency-dependent rating scale because the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies The A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) compensates for this discrepancy by discriminating against frequencies m a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear A-weighting de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequenaes of sound m a manner similar to the human ear The result is a decibel corrected for the variation m frequency response of the typical human ear at commonly encountered noise levels In general, people can perceive athree-dBA difference in noise levels, a difference of 10 dBA is perceived as being twice as loud, 20 d6 higher four times as loud, and so forth Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dB (very quiet) to 100 d6 (very loud) Environmental noise levels typically fluctuate over time, and different types of noise descriptors are used to account for this variability. The most useful noise descriptors measure time-averaged noise levels representing various times of the day as sensitvity to noise increases/decreases (sensitivity to noise increases during evening and rnght-time hours) The following are definitions of the terminology commonly used to describe noise and noise related impacts. CNEL (Community Noise Egwvalent Level) -The average equivalent A-weighted • sound level during a 24-hour period, obtained after addition of approximately five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7-00 p m to 10 00 p m and ten decibels to sound levels m the night after 10.00 p m and before 7 00 a.m N , o S°~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 d6(A) (A-Weighted Sound Pressure Level) -The sound pressure level, in decibels, as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound, plaang greater emphasis on those frequencies within the sensitivity range of the human ear Ldn (Day-Night Noise Level) -The average equivalent A-weighted sound level durmg a 24-hour day obtained by adding ten decbels to the hourly noise levels measured dunng the night (from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m) In this way Ldn takes into account the lower tolerance of people for noise durmg nighttime periods Leq (Equivalent Energy Level) -The sound level corresponding to a steady- state sound level containing the same total energy as atime-varying signal over a given sample penod, typically 1, 8 or 24 hours. One: (Maximum Sound Level) - A statistical value that represents the highest maximum sound level reading dunng a given penod A traffic noise study report was prepared for the proposed 368-unit protect using both City and State of California noise standards The City's Noise Element regwres that where exceeded, the exterior noise adtacent to residential uses must be mitigated to 65 CNEL for outside livng areas and that interior noise from exterior noise sources be mitigated to 45 CNEL for indoor living areas In addition, the state's criteria for implementing surface traffic noise controls from the Noise Abatement Cntena (NAC) established by the Federal Highway Administration are 65 dBA leq for exterior residential areas and 52 dBA leq for interior areas. Under state regulations, highway traffic noise must be mitigated when the predicted noise levels "approach or exceed" the NAC or when predicted noise levels substantially exceed existing ambient noise levels and it is reasonable and feasible to mitigate. For the noise study, two sound level monitoring systems were used at two sites within the protect boundary over a 24-hour period In addition, short-term noise measurements were taken at three locations to assist m defining the traffic noise propagation on-site Both the monitoring results and the noise prediction model show that noise due to current traffic on the I-15 freeway exceeds 65 CNEL at the freeway right-of-way property Ime. Predictions show that traffic noise due to Foothill Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue does not exceed 65 CNEL at the respective property fines According to traffic information provided by the City, future traffic noise from both Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 freeway will increase, while traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard will remain essentially the same • Nt~ ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 For protect apartments along the westerly property lines closest to the I-15 freeway, no "outdoor living areas" are planned for either the sides or the rear of these buildings They have been designed to serve as 31-foot high by 61 feet long noise barriers for the interior buildings on-site. Without these buildings to act as sound barriers for the I-15 traffic, noise would be approximately 65 CNEL 1,236 feet from the centerline of the freeway. With the noise mitigation provided by these buildings, freeway traffic noise would not exceed 65 CNEL in the outdoor livng areas past the noise barrier apartments, except for the central portion of the freeway right-of-way where no barrier buildings are planned. For the patios and balconies with a full or partial view of the I-15 freeway through the unmitigated central right-of-way portion of the protect, mitigation must be bwlt into the protect to reduce noise levels to 65 CNEL or less. Likewise, for units along Etiwanda Avenue, traffic noise at the front of the buildings will be a combination of unmitigated traffic noise from Etiwanda and mitigated I-15 traffic noise, which would be approximately 65 CNEL 116 feet from the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue Since Etiwanda Avenue traffic noise would exceed the City's noise standards, the following mitigation is regwred to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 CNEL or below. 18. A seven-foot high, 5/8-inch thick, solid Lexan (or an equivalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the I-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of Etiwanda Avenue. Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise barriers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City. As described in the noise analysis, the worst-case exterior noise exposure would occur at the second floor of the buildings nearest to the freeway and Etiwanda Avenue The overall noise levels at the roadway faang sides of the front line apartments would be approximately 75 CNEL along the freeway and 69 CNEL along Etiwanda Avenue An outdoor-to-indoor noise reduction of 30 dB and 26 d6, respectively, will be regwred to comply with the 45 CNEL interior noise level target. The following mitigation measure will ensure mtenor noise levels at within City standards 19. An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the design to provide ventilation for the units without requiring that windows be opened. The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation with City staff prior to issuance of building permits. 20. First floor apartment windows in buildings walls that would have a full or partial view of either the I-15 freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated windows. The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. N,o (~1 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 21. Buildings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either the I-15 freeway or Etiwanda, will require the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors. The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. Polenlwlly Sgmficanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially u~la : r a~ 9gmflranl MiOgaUOn Sigmhcant Na Impaq Incorpomtetl Impaq ImOett 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protections () () () (~) b) Police protections () () () (~) c) Schools () () (~) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () (~) ( ) e) Other governmental services () () () (~) Comments: The Etiwanda Specific Plan identifies the protect area as one of the highest intensities within the Etiwanda planning area The area is planned to contain one of the higher land use intensities. Appropriate conditions of approval will be placed on the protect prior to development a-e) Fire Protection -The protect site is located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, and is served by the Foothill Fire Protection District The nearest fire station is located on Baseline Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard, and approximately two miles northwest of the site. The Foothill Fire District is responsible for evaluating the protect through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process The proposed protect will include structural fire protection standards contained m the Uniform Fire Code. Police protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriff's Department The proposed residential development will include standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and doors Since a portion of the site contains existing residential units, with commercial development occurring less than 550 feet south of the protect site, the area is currently patrol and will not regwred additional police protection Schools -The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint High School Distract serve the protect area A standard condition of approval will requre the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant N,o l~2 • Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Parks -The proposed prolect will include recreational facilities onsite for the 368 dwelling units. Facilities will include a Mam Recreational Bwldmg, an Adult Recreation Center, and a Family Recreation Center Additional amenities mclude• a tot lot for ages 2-5, a children's wading pool, a tot lot for ages 5-12, a pool and spa, half-court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, and four barbecue/picnic facilities Since the prolect provided several recreational amenities onsite, the impact to local parks or future recreational opportunities is less than significant b) Public facilities -The proposed residential development will not significantly increase traffic on adjacent streets and rt is consistent will the City's Etiwanda Specific Plan which designates the area Medium Residential with projected future traffic after development The prolect includes improvements along Etiwanda Avenue right-of-way Additionally, the proponent will be required to construct all other necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase m traffic as a result of the prolect. PWenpally Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polemielly u~~: m S~gnifiwm M~ligafion Sgnficnnt No I ct Inco eletl I d Im h 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in aneed /or new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following ut~lrt~es• a) Power or natural gasp () () () (~) b) Communication systems O O O (~) c) Local or regional water treatment or distnbution () () () (~) facililies~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (~) e) Storm water drainages () () (~) ( ) f) Sohd waste disposah O O O (~) g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (~) Comments• a-g) The proposed prolect will mclude the construction of 368 dwelling units The proposed development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available m the immediate area The area, as discussed within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, is scheduled to include one of the higher relatwe land use intensities within the planning area Utility systems installed to service existing development within the area, are adequate and will not require major modifications or alterations Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler e) The prolect will increase demand upon storm dram systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site A N,o ~3 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Preliminary Drainage Report prepared for the protect by Dan Guerra & Associates indicated that existing Basin Number 6 be excavated to accommodate additional capacity This will allow development to occur, not increase runoff to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Channel and eliminate the adversity associated with onsite detention. Drainage Plans will be included in application submittals in addition to the Final Drainage Report for City Engineer review and approval See Section 4, Water for a discussion of Best Management Practices Potentially Sgnificant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantally u~ s ma Sgnificant Mnigafion SigmLCant No Im act Inm raletl Im ct Im ad 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal. a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (r) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (r) c) Create light or glares () () () (~) Comments• a-b) The protect site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway The area is designated Medium Residential development within the Etiwanda Specific Plan The proposed protect will blend with current and proposed surrounding development The protect site is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District With the exception of single-family residences, all other proposed development within the overlay distract is subtect to the issuance of the CUP In addition to applying for a CUP, it is the intent of the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District to protect and enhance the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue by requiring special setbacks, traditional architectural styles, and landscaping to be consistent with the streetscape theme for Etiwanda Avenue The proposed protect includes aesthetically pleasing elevations with large open space area and the replacement of declining trees with 1,202 new trees. c) The protect will create new light and glare as the site is currently vacant However, the site has been identified as a residential site so new light will not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as other residential development in the area. Potanllelly Sgnificant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potantally Impaq unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No I q Intro ateC I act Im n 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal • a) Disturb Paleontological resources () () () (r) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (~) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (r) ~,o ~y Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Potentially Sigmficam Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pplemielly Impact unlaaa Less man Signi(wnt Mnigaoon SigndiUnt No Im d Into etetl Im acl Im C d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restnct existmg religious or sacred uses within O O O (~) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources The site is located in a developing residential area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the protect site Poentially $ignificanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potamally un~ias: ina~ Sgmficant Mnigaaon S~gn~ficent No Im ecl I atetl I ad I act 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () (~) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities () () () (~) Comments• a) The proposed protect will include recreational facilities onsite for the 368 dwelling units Recreational facilities will include a Main Recreational Building, an Adult Recreation Center, and a Family Recreation Center. Additional amenities include• a tot lot for ages 2-5, a children's wading pool, a tot lot for ages 5-12, a pool and spa, half-court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, and four barbecue/picnic facilities Since the protect provides several recreational amenities onsite, the impact to local parks or future recreational opportunities is less than signrficant b) The proposed protect will be constructed on land that contains three existing residential units, and is designated Medium Residential Surrounding and adtacent land are also designated residential or commercial and are either currently developed, being developed or proposed for development N, o ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Potemially SigniOCant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Petanmlly Impact unless Lass roan Signiheanl Mrtigabon S~gn~fieant No Im ecl Into rata0 Im ect Im h 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the () () (~) ( ) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () () (r) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () (~) Q are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () (~) () ( ) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the U S Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997 The 26 7-acre site contains three residential units within the easternmost area and a vineyard within the westernmost area. The site is mostly vegetated with non-native grasses, a vineyard, and windrows of eucalyptus trees Past agricultural and residential development has eliminated native vegetation at this site According to the Arborist Report prepared for the protect site on September 20, 2001, a total of 86 trees on site meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size criteria for heritage trees There are 72 eucalyptus of various specimens and types, ten Italian Nio ~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 cypress, one fan palm, one frwtless mulberry, and two California peppers In general the eucalyptus are quite mature and are in declining condition and 13 specimens are dead Many of the other specimens are under going structural decline One eucalyptus tree is under attack from an insect that has caused it to defoliate and therefore decline The eucalyptus trees vary in condition between extremely mature specimens and smaller specimens that have grown underneath the canopies of the larger trees. Trees in both categories are m decline I Based on the proposed site development that calls for mass grading operations and widening of the west side of Etiwanda Avenue frontage, all of the existing specimen I trees on site are expected to be grossly impacted Therefore 75 of the 86 trees on site must be removed to allow for the proposed grading to accommodate I construction As stated within the report, several of the species are candidates for relocation. Ornamental trees onsite, including one fan palm and 10 Italian cypress are viable candidates for relocation and preservation onsite However none of these E 11 trees are individually mature or distinct in either from or character and it would . ~ not be considered a significant impact if the trees were removed The developer has acquired the necessary Tree Removal Permit and has paid all assoaated fees The j impact is not considered significant as a majority of the trees are in declining condition and the protect design indicates they wdl be replaced with 120, 36-inch ~ box trees, 120, 24-inch box trees, and 962, 15-gallon trees for a total of 1,202 new trees onsite • ~ b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality and noise with development of the protect site The short-term impacts will occur due to proposed I construction activities However, the impacts will cease once construction activities ~ are completed Implementation of mitigation measures presented m this Initial Study ~ wdl reduce short-term impacts to less than signrficant. j c) The proposed protect is consistent with the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, i Fmdmgs of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of butldout in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant I levels As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). I These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects j that wdl be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further ~' discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required ', c) Development of 368 apartments would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identified construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact However, proposed mitigation measures wdl reduce impacts to less than significant /V~p ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality are short-term and wdl cease once construction activities are completed A noise study was prepared for the protect to identify traffic noise levels at the protect site. The report indicated that the I-15 Freeway would be the dominate noise impact for the area The noise model m contunction with the onsite noise measurements indicated that the building face for the first row of apartments along the freeway would be exposed to noise levels as high as 79 2 CNEL, and that the entire site experiences noise levels greater than 65 CNEL The first row of apartments along Etiwanda Avenue would be exposed to a maximum traffic noise level of about 67.2 CNEL The exterior living areas m the protect must comply with the City's 65 CNEL Mitigation measure contained in the report are preliminary and are contained m this Initial Study A final report shall be prepared to finalize findings and measures prior to the issuance of budding permits Additionally, the protect must comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL As previously stated, the first row of buildings along the I-15 will experience noise levels as high as 79 3 CNEL This wdl regwre outdoor to indoor noise reductions of 34 2 dB to achieve the indoor noise standard This is a substantial level of nose reduction to achieve Windows facing the freeway should be small and will need to be upgraded with a high noise rating The exact rating of window will depend on the size and other elements A final noise analysis must be prepared to address the interior noise levels prior to the issuance of buddmgs permits The second row of bwldmgs along I-15 wdl experience noise levels as high as 73 CNEL This wdl require outdoor to indoor noise reductions of 28 dB High noise rating windows will be required for these units. The rating of window depends on size and other elements The first row of buildings wdl experience noise levels of about 67 CNEL A noise reduction of 22 dB wdl meet the City's standards Window and other buildings upgrades wdl not likely be requred for these units N, o ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed m an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) • Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (Certified 1983) • Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (October 2001) • Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (adopted December 7, 1983, revised June 1999) • United States Fish & Wildlife, Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly, Figure 6, September 14, 1997 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described m this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occi Signature. Print Name ~ 3/ 0 N~~ (d~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The /ollowing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with fire California Environmental Quality Act Sect/on 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Condfional Use Perod DRC2001-00557 Public Review Period Closes: January 9, 2001 Project Name: Project Applicant: Forecast Corporation Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of FoothAl Boulevard - APN 227-211-02, 04, O5, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Project Description: - A request to subdmde 26 7 acres of land into one lot for condomirnum purposes and to construct 368 apartments m the Medium Residential Distnct (8-14 dwelling unrts per acre), Etrvvanda South Overlay Disfict, and Etnvanda Avenue Overlay D~sfict wRhin the Etiwanda Speafic Plan Related file Tree Removal Perod DRC2001-00567 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaretion based upon the following finding: ~ The Inr6al Study shows that there ~ no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The In~hal Study identified potentially stgnficant effects but. (1) Rev~ons in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before the proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avod the effects or mi6gafe the effects to a point where clearly no s~grnficant effects would occur, and (2) There ~ no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wig not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The projectfile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review penod. January 9. 2002 Date of Determination Adopted By !~, 0 ~-~ RESOLUTION NO 02-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT, AND THE RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2001-00567, FOR 368 APARTMENTS ON 26 7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 A Recitals 1 Forecast Corporation filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2 On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, Huth a street frontage of approximately 1,700 feet on Etiwanda Avenue, and an approwmate lot depth of 1,500 feet, and is presently vacant, and b Eight existing single-family residences, not a part of the proposed protect, are located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site The I-15 Freeway borders the property on the north and west The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commercial development To the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, the property has been approved fora 272 multi-family residential development, and c The application contemplates a condominwm subdivision of one lot for 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land Hnthin the Medwm Residential District, Etnaenda South Overlay Distract, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, and N,o '~ I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-12 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 2 d The proposed project, together vHth the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vanity 3 Based upon the substantial evdence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The tentative trail is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and anyapplicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable incury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e. The tentative tract is not likelyto cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tractwill not conflict with anyeasement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative DeGaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent cudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and e~ibits, and the information provided to the rJ,o `~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-12 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 3 Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Diwsion 1) Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 is hereby approved subject to replacement planting as shown in the conceptual landscape plan 2) Walls shall comply with setback requirements of the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan Engineenng Droision• 1) Construct Etiwanda Avenue to "Secondary Artenal" and Etiwanda Specific Plan Standards, including cobble curb and gutter, sidewalk, dove approaches, street lights, street trees, a c pavement, traffic signs, and stnping a) Provide a sidewalk/walkway on the west side of Etrvuanda Avenue from the north protect boundaryto Miller Avenue b) Provde separate nght-tum lanes at both protect entrances The nght tum lane south of Garcia Dnve can be combined with a school bus bay per City Standards 2) Provide a focused Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue Mitigate traffic impacts to an acceptable level of service 3) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City pnorto Final Map approval The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontage 4) Install Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan System 9 drainage faalities in Foothill Boulevard from Etiwanda Avenue to the existing terminus south of Tract 15711-1 Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy This area is subtect to the modified fee adopted March 21, 2001 If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate N , o ~}3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-12 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION • January 9, 2002 Page 4 5) Install local storm drain faalities as needed from the protect site to Foothill Boulevard Install manhole at public/pri~ete function 6) Sumps in the private storm drain system shall be designed for 0100 Pond depth shall not exceed 12 inches 7) Prowde an ingress/egress access easement in favor of Assessor Parcel Nos 227-211-22 and 227-211-23 8) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Basin No 6 9) Tract 15711-1 has provided land for anarea-wide detention basin The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc) The fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 per acre, vhich shall be paid pnor to building permit issuance 10) Caltrans has not allowed storm drain faalities vnthin Foothill Boulevard. The required storm drain shall be constructed within the parkway or a City easement north of the Caltrans right-o~way Off-site easements shall be obtained pnor to Final Map approval. Environmental Mitigation Geologic 1) Site grading shall include removal and recompaction of surface sods Relative compaction shall be as determined by the protect engineer in a final geotechnical report. 2) Pnor to issuance of grading permits for the protect, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechnical report Water 1) The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how stormwaterwdl be conveyed across the site and directed into the Citys storm drain system 2) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the Cdy Engineer Av Quality 1) Painting actiwties shall be spaced out over a penod of 80 days Nt ~ '~~{ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-12 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 5 i 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizng agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 3) Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 5) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions 6) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energyeffiGency The construction contractorshall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance vnth the manufacturer's specifications 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpmentwhen not in use Transportation 1) Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking and controlling roadway access 2) Construct all streets internal to the protect to full ultimate cross-sections as adjacent development occurs 3) Construct all streets bordering the project to ultimate half-section widths in contunction with development 4) Landscape planting and signs shall be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility 5) Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adtacent artenals N,o '~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-12 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 6 Nose 1) Seven-foot high 5/8-inch thick, solid Lexan (or egwvalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the I-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial wew of Etiwanda Avenue Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise bamers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City 2) An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the design to prowde ventilation of the units without requinng that ~nnndows be opened The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation with City staff pnor to issuance of budding permits 3) First floor apartment windows in budding walls that would have a full or partial view of either the I-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will regwre the placement of acoustically rated windows The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted pnor to issuance of budding permits for the affected buildings. 4) Buildings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either the I-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Larry T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary N, ~ ~Co PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-12 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION • January 9, 2002 Page 7 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~J N , D '~'~- City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigaton measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance vall be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelines As morntonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP wdl be in place through all phases of the project The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps III be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially s~grnfirant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action Hell be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports wall be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~~~ Mitigation Momtonng Program TT SUBTT16257 & CUP DRC2001-00557 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further momtonng will be signed off as completed by the project planneror responsible Citydepartment at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unantiapated arcumstances may arise requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued. The project planneror responsible Citydepartment also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Dewsion shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure br the required period of time 9 In those instances requmng long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall prowde the City with a plan for momtonng the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporteras an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. VV I V I Project File No.: DRC 2001-00557/SUBTT16257 Initial Study Prepared by: _ Natalie P. Pattv Applicant: Forecast Coraoratlon Date: December 18 2001 . , .. 9 terns .~ ~,~ ~~ ,~° y ~' „ ~ ' ~ '" ' s+ ~ ~ ~. ~, ,Km,~ ,~ - .-, ~ - ~ ~ ,p. g k, Ste grading shall mGude removal a d r ~ U- 176^x, d ~ . . i e r` .. ~ ~ , s'r:. ;'a ax tt;`. ,44ur. "'t,-~ , t ~` r. ~`Y',-q, y, ~~"R 3`" n recempaction of surface sods Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineer in CE 8 Revlew of Plans C 2 a final geotechnical report Pnorto issuance of grading permds for thepro/ect,afinal grading plan shall be prepared in compliance Huth recommenda0ons contained in CP/CE B Review of Plans D 2 the final geotechnical report Water ~~„~:~ -,. „_ n~ , ,,,,,; ~hi=§''~%~ N;~"'*""; .. ,=,a~ ~ >^r~>~~~s',rw~''at The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan shovnng how CP/CE stonnwater vnll be conveyed across the sde and deeded into the Citys B Review of Plans D 2 stone dram system Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPS CE B to be Implemented during the penod the site is under censtruction Review of Plans C 2 BMPS shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Air Quality- . _ ~ ,.° kr ', ` F - i _ „ `~~`g'+~~yy 3P~: ~,, a' k ~" ~ ` ;o, _ r , Painting activities shall be spaced out over a penod of80 days ~ £ Y- CP .F - . + r'+ 9} "Z('° `- *filc„ ~~.~e"Y' `r -;di, n :"- C Review of Plans A 2 The site shall be treated vnth water or other soil stabilmng agent CP C (approved by SCA~MD and RWpCB) daily to reduce PM10 Review of Plans A 2 emissions, in accordance Wih SCADMD Rule 403 Ehwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established CP C Revlew of Pl A by the City to reduce PM10 emissions assoGated Hnth vehicle tradan ans 2 g of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of censWction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C 25 mph to minimi~ PM10 emissions from the site dunng such Revlew of Plans A 2 episodes Chemical soil stabili~rs (approved by SCAOMD and RWDCB) shall CP C be appl led to all inactive censtruction areas that remain Inactive for 96 Review of Plans A 2 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions The consWchon contractor shall select the censWChon egwpmenl CP used on-site based on low emission factorsand highcnergyeffiaency C Review of Plans A 2 The censtmchon centractor shall ensure the consWction grading plans inGude a statement that alt censtruction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's speGfigtions Z c MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) 0 - - .. .. ... -. The constmcbon contractorshall utdrze eledncor dean altemabve fuel CP C powered equipment where feasible Review of Plans A 2 The consWcbon contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP B/C Review of Plans A/C plans mdude a statemenlthatwork news will shut off equipmentwhen 2 not in use Traffic x ,t r. , ~ - r_a .. r~~, ~„,~rxx-, ~~ - Malntaln ahigh level of service along artenals by restricting parking PO C and cenWlling roadway access Review of Plans A 2 Construct all streets mtemal to the protect to full ultimate cross- CE C Review of Plans A sections as adjacent development occurs 2 Construct all streets bordering the pro/ect to ultimate half-secLOn CE C Review of Plans A vndths in cenlunchon wth development y Landscape planting and signs should be limited to 36 inches in height CP D Review of Plans A wnthin 25 feet of proect driveways to assure good visibdity 3 Install a STOP sign on site egress roadvy to adjacent artenals CP D Review f Pl o ans A 9 Noise ~^ • ~>~ , -~, ° ~ , Seven-fool high, 5/&inch thick, solid Lexan (or an equivalent abrasion CP D resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patlo and balcenysound Review of Plans A 3 bamer panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies vnthin 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the I-15 freeway and wnthin 140 feet of the centedine of Etnvanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of Etiwanda Avenue Final size and cemposition of material to be used in the noise bartiers shall be determined in a final acousticel analysrs of the final sde plans submitted to the City An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be induded in the BO D Review of Plans A design to provide ventilation for the umts without requmng that 3 windows be opened The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation wth City staff poor to issuance of budding pertnds Firstfloor apartrnent wandowsln bwiding walls thatwould haveafull or 80 D Review of Plans A 9 partlal view of either the I-15 freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placementofaceustlceilyrated wnndows The exadratlngshall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to Issuance of building pernifs br the aNected buildings Buildings nearestthe roadways that have a full or partial view of either BO D Review of Plans A 3 the I-15 freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated eMenor doors The final design and reting of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted poor to issuance ofbuilding permits for the affected bwldings ~~ L~ - - -n@~ io ~iieckiist Abbreviations - - -- ---- -- - ---- -------- - --- -- -- ------------- Responsible Pelson M CDD - Commumty Development Dnector or designee onitoring Frequency A -With Each New Develo ment Method oiveNflcation A Sanctlons CP - City Planner or designee p g _ Pnor To ConsWction - On-sde Inspection B O h 1 -Withhold Recerdatio CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction - t er Agency Permit /Approval C Pl C 2 - Wdhhold Grading or BO -Building Offiaal or designee PO -Police Captain or designee D - On Completion E -Operating - an heck D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 3 -Withhold Certificate 4 -Stop Work Order FC - Flre Chief or designee 5 -Retain Depositor Bc fi - Rwvn4n CI ID Z Q COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT16257 SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments APPLICANT: Forecast Corporation LOCATION: West Side of Etiwanda, North of Foothill Boulevard ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Cdy, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No 16257 is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 3 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, bwlding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and marntarned in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaprng, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations and the Ehwanda Specific Plan A t 2 SC-11-01 1 t I ~ ~ J Comole6on Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- Prge ct No SUBTT16267 Comolehon Date 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ _ time of budding permit Issuance 4 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete _ _ _ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Clty Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Namrng Policy prior to approval of the final map _ _ _ 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Assoaation are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engrneer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said Information changes 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape _ _ _ maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 8 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / / lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, publlc notice _ _ _ regwrements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing D. Landscaping 1 For multi-family resldentlal and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 2 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included _/_/_ in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated far consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 3 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and Intensified landscaping, is requred along Etiwanda Avenue E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the project The applicant Is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner In the amount of $719 pnor to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertortnance SC-11-01 2 ~ t 9\ 4b1.~ Project No SU6TT16257 Comolehon Date and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single Irne diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Dvision Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Archdect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are requved for fencing and/or walls 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the Cdy prior to permit issuance G. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please wntact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mator addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Dvision prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Offiaal, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permts 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays SC-11-01 3 N I ~ ~~ -/-/- -/-~ _/-/. -/_/. -/_~ -/-/- -/-/- -/_/ Prote ct No SUBTT16257 Comole4on Date 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/ counter) ~ 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department / / for approval _ _ _ H. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code for the property line clearances considering / / use, area, and fire-resistiveness _ _ _ 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separation(s) _/_I_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table _/ / 5-A _ _ 5 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls / / 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A / / 7 If the area of habitable space above the first Floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/_/_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour 8 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour / / fire-resistive construction _ _ _ I. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City _/_/_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / / perform such work _ _ _ 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application for grading plan check _ _ _ 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits _/_/ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for / / existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of _ _ _ combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Crotl Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/ street centerline) _ 50 total feet on Eitwanda Avenue / / SC-11-01 4 N ~ ~ ~~ Protect No SUBTT16267 Comolehon Date 2 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the Clty for the following streets, except far approved openings Etlwanda Avenue 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring point maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adtacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided 7 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain ~. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 AC Side- Dnve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Trail (b) Etlwanda Avenue X X X X X e Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Traffic Signals, (f) Cobble Curb 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-11-01 5 N f ~ ~~ Prote ct No SUBTT16257 Comolehon Date b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction / / permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits _ _ ~ requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and / / rnterconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _ _ _ d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / / protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and _ _ _ tnterconnect wiring Puli boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per Ctty / / Standards or as directed by the Ctty Engineer _ _ _ f Existing Ctty roads regwnng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash _ _ _ deposit shall be provided to cover the oast of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots _ _ ~ h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/ / 4 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way I-15 / / Freeway _ _ _ L. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to toin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building _ _ _ permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 All regwred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/ / developer until accepted by the City _ M. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/ / approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall _ _ be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made far acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/ / property from adjacent areas _ _ N. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/ / electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility _ _ Standards Easements shall be provided as required SC-11-01 8 N t b ~$ Protect No SUBTT16257 Completion Date 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdroision or prior to the Issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them O. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit Issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way Cal Trans 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Clty, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION ANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/-/. -/_/. sc-„-o, 7 N ,`~ ~~ '~~u'~- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0532 PROJECT #: SUBTT16257/DRC2001-00557 PROJECT NAME: Forecast DATE: December 18. 2001 j PLAN TYPE: _ CUP for 386 Und Apartments ~ APPLICANT NAME: Michele Schiro OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 w/Group A, Division 3 Uses ,~ FLOOR AREA (S): 16 or more dwelling urnts LOCATION: N/O of Foothill W/O Etiwanda FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protection Planning Specialist ~ PLANNER: Kart Coury i ~ ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire District requrements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result m additional or changed Fire Distract requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for rewew Prior to approval by the Planning Division compliance with ail conditions andlor corrections must be completed All Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed for construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to venfy compliance A. Commundy Facildies Distracts ~ 1 This protect is subject to the regwrements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District 'I r ~ B. Water Plans for Fire Protection ' 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District ~~ 2 Prior to the issuance of any bwiding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, ~ flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire ' District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards .I ~ 3 Fire flow regwrements for this protect shall be 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended N I~ ~~ 4 When any portion of a faality or bulding is located in excess of 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 5 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combust building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible budding materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builderldeveloper shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the budder/developer in the presence of the Water Distract or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 8 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include morn size 9 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicent shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 10 Requred Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the budding permd a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire Distract for acceptance 11 Prior to the issuance of any Certificete of Occupancy, all rare hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavem~ marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On prrvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avadabilrtv for Fire Protection Farm shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be required in each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow D. Automatic Fve Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the bwlding(s) 2 All commeraal structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupances with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E Frre Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 3 Required Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commeraal structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire Distri access regwrements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire Distract N ~~- °~ ~ 4 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire sprinkle system Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Constructioi Services permit 5 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested am accepted by Fire Construction Services 6 The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group Occupanaes, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupanaes E. Fire Access 1 Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, bwldmg, or portion of a buddinc constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the bwidinc is located more than 150-feet from approved fire distract vehicle access The distance is measured by ar approved route around the exterior of the faality or budding 2 Fire District access roadways shall include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, street; and designated fire lanes 3 Residential Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 4 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire Distract in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be Gearty marked when adead-end sVeet exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise regwred Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modfiications in fire lanes or access roadways Hnthout prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Dmsicn 5 The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire Distract access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical Gearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of fraffic lanes shall be 20 feet 6 All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located v~nthin 150 feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwldmg Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior bwldmg openings 7 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed pnor to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bwldmg plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Dvision for specific details and ordering information 8 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fire Distract access roadways/driveways 9 Gated or restricted access regwres the installation of a Knox rapid entry system Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fve Distract Knox Key Switch The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch Gates shall open by means of an approved Traffic Pre-emption Device Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information 10 The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems This condition applies when the Fire District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or delaying response exists 11 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehiGes 12 A budding or site directory shall be regwred, as noted below Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site 13 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, m accordance wdh Fire Distract Standards N t ~ 012 14 Dead-end Fire District access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus This may include a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead " or other means approved by the Fire Distract 15 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Distract for fire lanes on regwred Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans s indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 far a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 16 Prior to the issuance of any Certrficete of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CCBR's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes 17 New bwldings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electracelly illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwiding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 18 In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or bwldings The Fire Disfrict shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga F. Combustible Construction Letter Required Note Prior to the issuance of a building permil for combustible construction, the bwlder shall submd a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire DisVict Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained all times G. Architectural Bwlding Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Distract Call the Fire Construction i Services Umt at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal H. Fire Alarm System 1 An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard 2 Pnor to issuance of a bulding permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction ~ Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Distract permit ` ~ 3 Prior to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire Distract approval and a permit are required Plans and specrficetions shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services ' ! 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and I accepted by Fire Construction Services ~~ I. Fire District Fees Due Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract as follows ' ~r $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial or multi-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) ,' $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection .; ~l(o °i3 $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new belding) for Multi-family Residential Development 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm . systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans J. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be regwred, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be requued for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life ar property b Operate a place of public assembly c To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the regwred fire district access roadway This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fire District response d Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet e Operate dust-producing processes and operations f Flammable and combustible ligwd (storage, handling, and/or use) g Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 120 gallons) h Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy) K. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations 1 The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions regwre that the San Bemardmo County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan far compliance wdh minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 3 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated 4 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pestiades, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount 5 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount 6 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) m quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 7 Any business sub/ect to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements To get more . information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this regwrement, however, EPCRA does requve full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory N I lJ 8 Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR If the factlity is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding and Safety wail not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingen Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous material disclos regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance 10 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is requred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner 11 The Fire Code adapted by the Fire District has a provision regarng collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fve Distract after d is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be regwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs L. Plan Submittal Reqwred Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews wdl be assessed at hme of submittal of plans _ Fire Distract Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision (J ~ ~ ~15- RESOLUTION NO 02-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 368 APARTMENTS ON 26 7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT W (THIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE,NORTH OFFOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF -APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10,15, 17, 20, AND 29 A Recitals 1 Forecast Corporation filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect conditional use permit request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 9th day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial ev~denn: presented to this Commission during the above- referencedpublic hearing on January 9, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 1,700 feet on Etiwanda Avenue, and an approwmate lot depth of 1,500 feet, and is presently vacant, and b Eight existing single-family residences, not a part of the proposed protect, are located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site The I-15 Freeway borders the property on the north and west The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commernal development To the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, the property has been approved fora 272 multi-family residential development, and c The application contemplates the development of 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land within the Medwm Residential Distract, Etiwanda South Overlay Distract, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Spenfic Plan, and d The proposed protect, together vuth the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the hnnity ^ , t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-13 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The conditional use permit is consistentwith the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The design or improvements of the protect is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The development of the proposed protect will not cause a significant traffic impact on the surrounding area, and e The design of the protect is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and vmldlife or their habitat, and f The design of the protect will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califoma Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration vnth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califoma Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows. In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and e~ibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations tit , o q ~}- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-13 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 is hereby approved subject to replacement planting as shown in the conceptual landscape plan 2) Walls shall comply with setback requirements of the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan 3) The roll-up garage door designs shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval 4) Architectural enhancements through the use ofnative aver rock shall be provided to the bindings fronting Etiwanda Avenue, subject to City Planner review approval 5) Additional landscaping and trees shall be provided at the interior project perimeter adjacent to the existing single-family residences at the central portion of the site, to reduce the visual impact of the proposed bindings on the surrounding neighbors, to the satlsfacUon of the City Planner. 6) The decorative perimeter fence along Etiwanda Avenue shall incorporate large native stone plasters in its design The stone plasters shall be developed at a minimum of 30 inches squared and subject to City Planner approval 7) All applicable Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 shall apply Eng ineenno Dmsion 1) Construct Etiwanda Avenue to "Secondary Arterial" and Etiwanda Speafic Plan Standards, including cobble curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights, street trees, a c pavement, traffic signs, and striping a) Provide a sidewalk/walkwayon the west side of Etiwanda Avenue from the north project boundaryto Mller Avenue b) Provide separate right turn lanes at both project entrances The right tum lane south of Garcia Drive can be combined with a school bus bay per City Standards 2) Provide a focused Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the intersection of Foothll Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue Mitigate traffic impacts to an acceptable level of sernce ~ ~ ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-13 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 4 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City pnorto Final Map approval The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontage 4) Install Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan System 9 drainage faalities in Foothill Boulevard from Etiwanda Avenue to the existing terminus south of Tract 15711-1 Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the faality and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy This area is subtect to the modified fee adopted March 21, 2001 If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 5) Install local storm drain faalities as needed from the protect site to Foothill Boulevard Install manhole at public/pmete function 6) Sumps in the private storm drain system shall be designed for 0100 Pond depth shall not exceed 12 inches 7) Prowde an ingress/egress access easement in favor of Assessor Parcel Nos 227-211-22 and 227-211-23 8) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Basin No 6 9) Tract 15711-1 has provided land for anarea-wide detention basin The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc) The fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 per acre, ~nhich shall be paid pnor to building permit issuance 10) Caltrans has not allowed storm drain facilities within Foothill Boulevard The regwred storm drain shall be constructed within the parkway or a City easement north of the Caltrans right-o~way Off-site easements shall be obtained pnor to Final Map approval. Environmental Mdiaation Geologic 1) Site grading shall include removal and recompaction of surface soils Relative compaction shall be as determined by the protect engineer in a final geotechmcal report Nip q~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-13 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 5 2) Pnor to issuance of grading permits for the protect, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechrncal report Water 1) The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how storm waterwdl be conveyed across the site and directed into the Cdys stone dram system 2) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented dunng the period the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Av Qualify 1) Painting actrnties shall be spaced out over a penod of 80 days 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabdmng agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance Hnth SCAQMD Rule 403 3) Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site dunng such episodes 5) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 6) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energyefficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance Huth the manufacturer's speafications 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use N ,o X00 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-13 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 6 Transportation 1) Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking and controlling roadway access 2) Construct all streets internal to the project to full ultimate cross-sections as adtacent development occurs 3) Construct all streets bordering the protect to ultimate half-section widths in contunction Huth development 4) Landscape planting and signs shall be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good Hsibility 5) Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adtacent arterials Nose 1) Seven-foot high 5/8-inch thick, solid Lexan (or equivalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balwmes within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the I-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial wew of Etiwanda Avenue Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise barriers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City 2) An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the design to prowde ventilation of the units without requiring thatHnndows be opened The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation Huth City staff poor to issuance of building permits 3) First floor apartment Hnndows in buildings walls that would have a full or partial view of either the I-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will regwre the placement of acoustically rated windows The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of budding permits for the affected buildings 4) Buildings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either the I-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue, will regwre the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of budding permits for the affected buildings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution IJ IO >O~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-13 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 9, 2002 Page 7 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretaryof the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th dayof January 2002, bythe following vote-to-vnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS -...J ~ ~ ~~2 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 This Mitigation Morntoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 ofthe Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance well be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps vnll be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation Hell be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports uHll be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Divison) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N,0 l03 Mitigation Monitoring Program TT SUBTT16257 & CUP DRC2001-00557 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible Citydepartment at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The pro/ect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reportmg Form will be completed by the pro/ect planneror responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel t~J 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible Citydepartment also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Devision shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitorand report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requiring long-term pro/ect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporteras an individual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits r~ N ~ o ~o~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC 2001-00557/SUBTT16257 Applicant: _ Forecast Corooratlon Initial Study Prepared by: Natalie P. Pattv Date: December 18 2001 - ' Geologic Problem ',~~~., ,~, ~",~~~,.~~~ xis S v a' ~(~; y'°~:}~~1}4/~ ~ `4 r, ~ .-`Y"'iLe ~ it Site grading shall indude removal and recompactlon of surface soils Relative compacLon shall be as determined by fhe proled engineer in a final geotechnicel report Prior to Issuance of grading pernits for the project, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendatlons contained in the final geotechnical report .. .- ,~ ~r~~st=r~6 ~ ,, ~;~ Y "' } :~ 44`t d4' t~C.~7+• 3..{-~ CE CP/CE -. ~~ FRq ~.. B B .. ~ ~ - r ,Review of Plans Review of Plans ... - . ~/.: ,. C D -. .. ~~ ~~ "V'rAk ~~~~~ . { ~ 4 ~~''~~ 2 2 Water k ~ ~v~' ,. n.nV,t' ~~` x i'1S+'1YT= ~,i~ ~NSi3~ i~~~M1~:t±/X~ t , The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how CP/CE B y stormwatervnll be conveyed across the sde and deeded into Me Gtys Review of Plans D 2 storm drain system Pnor to Issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs CE B Review of Plans C to be Implemented during the penod the site is under consWCtlon 2 BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for rewewand approval by the City Engineer Air Quality ~ ~~ .~ ~~'r .roF ~*c •..~ r~~-.eP.pi - i ~zt~a- Paintmg activities shall be spaced out over a penod of80 days CP C Review of Plans A 2 The site shall be treated vnih water or other soil stabilmng agent CP C Review of Plans A (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 2 emissions, in accordance wth SCAOMD Rule 403 Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established CP C Review of Plans A by the City to reduce PM10 emissions assoaated with vehicle lredang 2 of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of Plans A 2 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWpCB) shall CP C Review of Plans A 2 be applied to all inactive cons W ctlon areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment CP used on-site based on low emissim factors and high~nergyeffiaency C Review of Plans A 2 The construction contractor shall ensure the censWction grading plans indude a statementthat all consWchonequipmentw~ll be Wned and maintained m accordancewith the manufacturer's speaficahons 0 O - - The censWCtion contractorshall utilize elednc or dean alternativefuel powered equipment where feasible The wnsWction contractor shall ensure that consWction-grading plans indude a statementthat work crews will shut off equipment when notinuse .. CP CP C B/C .. Review of Plans Review of Plans ., . A AIC -. 2 p Traffic ~ nay ,,.~"~^ '~ [- a o"nu`6TI S. n r ~ ~L.r =° r~.; wrt,, - "i~•zrv . r i ~~ ~i'K X^' ,».~~~ " 'u~ tln ' i ~ e ~ ~ ~.,~ ,~,n ~ ~~,, a ~~~I~~~ ~ , ~, ti S " ~ ,.. : +rna r R~- ., v :,~y v (=` v. -, Maintain a high level of service along artenals by restncting parking PO C and controlling roadway access Review of Plans A 2 ConsWd all streets Internal to Me pro/ed to full ultimate cross- CE C sections as adjacent development occurs Review of Plans A 2 Construct all streets bordenng the protect to ultimate half-section CE C widths in conjunction wM development Review of Plans A 2 Landscape planting and signs should be limded to 36 inches in height CP D vnMin 25 feet of pro)ect dnveweys to assure good visibility Review of Plans A 9 Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adjacent artenals CP D Review of Pla A ns 3 Noise A ~ ,. :~= - ~-,~y.. ;~ ~~,, ~ .~,~. Seven-foot high, 5/&inch thick, solid Lexan (or an egwvalentabrasion CP D Review of Plans A resistant, non-yellowing transparent matenap patlo and balcony sound 3 bamer panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway rightof-way that have a full or paNal view of the I-15 freeway and vnMin 140 feet of the centerline of Etnvanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of ENranda Avenue Final size and composition of matenal to be used in the ndse bamers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final sde plans submitted to the Cily An appropnate venGlahon or cooling system shall be inducted in the BO D Review of Plans A 3 design to provide ventilation for the units without requmng that vnndows be opened The type of ventilabon system will be chosen in consultation wM City stag poor to Issuance ofbuilding permits Firstfloor apartmentvnndowsin building walls Matwould haveafull or BO D Review of Plans A 9 partial view of either the I-15 freeway or EGwanda Avenue will require the placementof acousticellyreted windows Theexad rating shallbe determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to Issuance ofbuilding permits br the aBeded buildings Buildings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either BO D Review of Plans A 9 the I-15 freeway or Etrvranda Avenue well regwre the placement of acoustically rated extenor doors The final design and rating of the doors and related matedals shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis Mat shall be conducted prior to Issuance ofbuilding permits for Me aRected bwldings O --Key to Gnecktist Abbreviations-- - ~ - ~ ~-- -- --~-- --- - ~-- -- - -- -- -~--- ~ - Responsible person Monitoring Frequency Method of Veriflcaflon Sanctions CDD -Community Development Dvector or designee CP -City Planner or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CE -City Engineer or designee B - Pnor To ConsWChon B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwldmg Permit BO -Building OffiGal or designee C -Throughout Construction D - On Completion C -Plan Check D 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy PO - Pohca Captain or designee E -Operating -Separate Submittal (Reports I Studies I Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order FC - Fre Chief or designee 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 0 l COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments APPLICANT: Forecast Coraoration LOCATION: West Side of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Foothill Boulevard ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included m legible form on the grading plans, bulding and construction plans, and landscape and irngation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Vanance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained rn accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Drnsion, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan ComoleGOn Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. SC-11-01 1 IV I~ 1o V Protect No DRC2001-00557 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business actmty being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_! of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~ 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for I / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ _ bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waroe compliance with all sections of the Development Code, _/_/_ all other applicable Ctty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bulding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and / / the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the _ _ _ tssuance of building permtts 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete _ _ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 Street names shall be submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map _ _ _ 11 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 12 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions _ _ _ and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 13 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape _ _ _ maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 14 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of alt / / lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ _ regwrements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing SC-11-01 2 N I O ~~ Prgect No DRC2001-00557 15 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double vial condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoininc property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect': perimeter 16 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant 17 For multiple family development, laundry faaliGes shall be provided as required by the Development Code 18 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space shall be provided 19 For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as requred by the Development Code 20 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products D. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans ~. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a bulding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk 6 The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the prinapal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior arculation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas 7 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way Completion Date -/-/- I / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / /_/ -/_/. / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. / / SC-11-01 3 ~ to 1 `O Prgect No DRC2001-00557 Comolehon Date 8 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commeraal, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_I residential protects or more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, addit~onai storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the requred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within _/_/_ the pro/ect 0% - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24- inch box or larger, 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view ad/scent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of budding 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion ~ control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and vrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and tramming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included _/_/_ in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along Etiwanda Avenue SC-11-01 4 ~ IO \~\ Project No DRC2001-00557 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air condittomng, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls _/_/~ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and Ctty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / / the City pnor to permit tssuance _ _ _ K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/ / marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest _ _ adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Drvtsion for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to tssuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or motor addition to _/_/_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and _/_/_ prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per Ctty Standard (available at the Planning Drviston's public _/_/ counter) ~ SC-11-01 6 N (~ 11~ Prgect No DRC2001-OD557 Completion Date 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department / / for approval _ _ L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for the property line clearances considering /_/_ use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions I / 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table / / 5-A - - - 5 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls / / 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A / / 7 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the / / construction type shall be V-1 Hour --- 8 Walls and floors separating dwelling units to the same bwlding shall be not less than 1-hour / / fire-resistive construction --- M. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City / / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in _ _ _ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / / pertorm such work --- 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application far grading plan check _ _ _ 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of budding permits _/_/_ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction pro/ects and for / / existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of _ _ _ combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / / street centerline) - -- 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue _/_/_ 2 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for / / approved openings Etiwanda Avenue _ _ SC-11-01 7 ~' O ~`l.` Protect No DRC2001-00557 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring loin maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's o deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated of noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to prowde a minimum of i feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adtacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane. a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided 7 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interest: necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall prowde for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security far a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to _Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain O. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Trail (b) Etlwanda Avenue X X X X X e Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Traffic Signals, (f) Cobble Curb 3 Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred Completion Date /_/_ / / /_/_ /_/_ /_/_ -/-/~ -/-/- -/-/- _/_/~ S~_„-0, 8 N , ~ ~~s Project No DRC2001-00557 Comolehon Date P c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduct, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Crty Standards or as directed by the Crty Engineer i f Existing Crty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with j adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer i g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check ~4 A permd shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way I-15 ~ Freeway I1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin andlor form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer All requred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ~ developer until accepted by the City jPublic Maintenance Areas Q (Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall j be installed as required by the City Engineer ,~ Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the nrnnertv from adjacent areas it R..,Utilities ,1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~~ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) m accordance wdh the Utility ' Standards Easements shall be provided as required r ' ? The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _~-~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~-~. -~-~- -l-l- -~-~- -l-l- SC'11-01 9 N I ~ ~`~Q Project No DRC2001-00557 Comolehon Date S. APP WIT T. 1 3 U. 1 2 3 4 V. S 1 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ Security Lighting 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ Security Hardware SC-11-01 10 N I O ~t~ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/~ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is requved prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevame Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agences for work within their right-of-way Cal _/_/_ Trans new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved LICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE H THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting in exterior areas shall be mvandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _/_/_ One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ Ail roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either von bars, metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed ecurity Fencing All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police _/_/_ with a keypad access and a unique code The irntial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Umt along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 Project No DRC2001-00557 ~W. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner 2 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire X. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility 2 At the entrances of commeraal or residential complexes, an illummated map or directory of protect shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Diwsion 3 All developments shall submit a 8 %" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department Y. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 ~PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED Comolehon Date -/-/. -/_/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -.~ '.~,~~' FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ ~ - `~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0532 PROJECT #: DRC2001-00557/SUBTT16257 PROJECT NAME: Forecast Group DATE: December 18, 2001 PLAN TYPE: CUP for 386 Unit Apartments APPLICANT NAME: Michele Schlro OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 w/ Group A, Division 3 Uses FLOOR AREA (S): 16 or more dwelling units LOCATION: N/O of Foothill W/O Etiwanda • FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Kirt Coury ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire District requirements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review Prior to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed All Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed for construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Community Facilities Districts 1 This protect is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new • public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Prior to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards ~ ~ti l~~ 3 Fire flow requirements for this protect shall be 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amende 4 When any portion of a faality or bulding is located in excess of 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 5 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Dmsion 8 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 9 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 10 Requved Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following pnor to the issuance of the building permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made far the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of, the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reaprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 11 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of ReFlecGve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good conddion by the property owner C. WaterAvailabddy 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire Flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District Water Avadabdrtv /or Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If suffiaent water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshmg system may be regwred m each structure affected by the insufficient flow D. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the building(s) 2 All commeraal structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupanaes with an occup~ load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and ail structures which do not meet District access requrements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic i sprinkler system ~ , D 12b 3 Required Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commercal structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupances with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access regwrements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire Distract 4 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire sprinkler system Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 5 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 6 The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required wdh 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupances E. Fire Access 1 Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every faality, building, or portion of a building constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150-feet from approved fire district vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building 2 Fire District access roadways shall include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes 3 Residential Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 4 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans far all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation Huth the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Dmsion 5 The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 6 All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located vnthin 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior building openings 7 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bulding plan approval Contact the Fve Safety Droision for specific details and ordering information 8 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across requred Fire District access roadways/driveways 9 Gated or restricted access regwres the installation of a Knox rapid entry system Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch Gates shall open by means of an approved Traffic Pre-emp6on Device Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information 10 The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems This condition applies when the Fire District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or delaying response exists N,~ 12\ 11 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 12 A budding or site directory shall be required, as noted below Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site 13 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and dear of any obstructions at all times durng construction, in accordance with Fire Distract Standards 14 Dead-end Fire Distract access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the fuming around of fire apparatus This may inGude a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District 15 Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire Distract for fire lanes on requred Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locebons of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 16 Pnor to the issuance of any Certficate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CCBR's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also ~dentrfy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes 17 New buildings shall post the address with minimum 6-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncelly illuminated during penods of darkness When the bulding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at property entrance 18 In multi-und complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or buildings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga F. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bulding pernd for combustible construction, the bwider shall submit a letter to the Fire Distract on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible matenal is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times G. Architectural Bwlding Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a bulding permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Distract Call the Fve Construction Services Umt at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal H. Fire Alarm System 1 An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard 2 Pnor to issuance of a budding permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit N , ~ 12Z, 3 Prior to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire District approval and a permit are requred Plans and spec cations shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested anc accepted by Fire Construction Services I. Fire District Fees Due 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fir< District as follows ' $82 Start-up fee far commercial, industrial or multi-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Pnvate Fire Mains or Fire Spunkier Underground Water Supply $677 (per new building) for Multi-family Residential Development 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans J. Hazard Control Pennds 1 As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, . which in the /udgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life or property b Operate a place of public assembly c To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the required fire distract access roadway This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fire Distract response d Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet e Operate dust-producing processes and operations f Flammable and combustible ligwd (storage, handling, and/or use) g Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 120 gallons) h Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy) K. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations 1 The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions require that the San Bemardino County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emds, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 3 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated N )~0 423 4 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount 5 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount 6 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 7 Any business subtect to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade regwrements To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agenaes Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement, however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA faalities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory 8 Any business that handles radioactive matenal that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR 9 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous matenal disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be requred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new faality Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance _ 10 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is regwred submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receroing a request from the owner 11 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requinng collection of information regarding hazardous materials at faalities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Pnor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materals Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs L. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction in accordance v~nth 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision • ~,0 12~ .~ TO' Brad Buller, City Planner Clry of Rancho Cucamonga FROM Don Glover 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga ~r ~ Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JqN ~ 3 ?O~ RECf1VFp _ p~ANNING toe Rusting 12837 Chervil Street, Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments -Impact On Our Homestead Properties January 2,1001 Dear Sir. threersides by the proposed Etiwanda ApartrnenPs,ralyro ect by Forecast Homes. toe Rustling's property is lot 22 (approximately 1 acres) and Don Glover's property is lot 23 (approximately ~ acres) as shown on the attached County Assessor's Map. Also note the proposed Etiwanda Apartments development shown on the map. We were Inwted, along with other neighbors, to a meeting held by Forecast Homes at City Hall on November 20, 2000. Forecast Homes presented their plan and asked if we had any questions. We were frankly shocked We expressed our concern about access to our properties, hour we would get water 8 gas from Etiwanda foot high wall towering over our properdt es agong the propertyDines of the proposed development Additionally, there was also nothing in the plans that indicated what the impact would be of surface water drainage on or over our properties from the proposed development Although the plans showed some form of access to our properties, the developer questioned our right to a county easement to our properties, stating that the easement was "his easement" Also, there was no discussion of how we would access our properties while the protect was being developed All m all, the meeting gave us no assurances that our properties would not be adversely affected Additionally, the city representatwe that was present said very I,ttle and did not advise us about our rights. ! The next meeting we had was on December 27, 2001 wrth the developer We ' (Glover & Rustling) were there along wrth four of the six property owners along Chervrt Street, It quickly became apparent that the svte purpose of the meeting was for Forecast to buy us aut However, rn our opinion, Forecast was looking to buy our properties at below market value Don Glover asked the developer for land sale comparables, but the developer card it was not relevant We have subsequently received a letter from Crty Hall that there will be a Planning Board meeting on January 9, 2002 rn regard to the approval of the protect. frankly, this was a great surprise to us We were surprised that it has gotten this far without any input from us, the people ' most affected. We do not believe that the developer or the city have adequately provrded us with the rnformatron necessary for us to respond. So, we request that you postpone any deliberation in regard to Etrwanda Gardens on your scheduled January 9, 2002 meeting Also, in order for us to adequately evaluate the impact on our houses, we request that you provide us with the following information needed by our planning consultant. 1. the complete submittal set for Etrwanda Gardens, including all conceptual grading and utility plans. 2. A copy of the city's negative declaration in regard to the protect. 3, Forecast's application and all staff reports in regard to the property 4. if available, transcripts of design review meetings between Forecast and the city. We believe the negative declaration on this protect was premature and that the city did not provide vs with the information needed to respond The crry of Rancho Cucamonga has a reputation for respecting the property tights of all aroperty owners, not just big developers. Don Glover's family has owned its land for over 100 years and )ce Rusting has also been a long time resident, Again, we request that this protect not go forward until we are adequately and fairly informed and that we have an adequate and fair opportunity to respond. We need assurances from the city that our property rights will be protected through conditions placed on this development, rf It is approved. As a fast step, we look forward to meeting with you and being provrded with the above requested information Please call Don Glover at 909-226-9465 if you have any questions Sincerely, ` c ~J Don Glover oe Rusting / ., ~~ I i i i i i i I :1 ~C .'t'o CITY 'Q1.14t~'`~'=-'r-- ~ ~Y ~ro~~A i~ i I i ~C3 , ~ ~ X ' Hi ~~ 8 x, s s i f ~ YT_~ ~ ' a g g S~ ~ 3 q. I ro l M~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~~+- -1 I -j--~ ll I ~ t W~A e 1,`, ~r ~ ,~ I I s le ~ a'a ro. a .1 i ~~____ S ~~D~ - ? m 9~ a rN „ 4. a N A 1`_i`1i^^v~))~ V~ I ~ as r~ ` la ~ 1~ ` i ~~ ~ ~. a~ _IU`/( A+ IV M ` C ~ } N ~ '~ J ~ ~ C ~ s ~ n v N ~ 3~~~i •~ t;$Api ~~_ N Oror:. EXP•RS0v0381S7 Descnp'ion ?27.21 Page 1 0' S CurrmenC TO: FROM. SUBJECT: January 6, 2(x12 Dear SIr: Brad Bunts, City Plaona City of Rancho Cucamonga Lourdes & Erick Tuguaos lOnl Hillside Road, Alta Loma Gail Tims 128~Chervil Street, Rancho Cucamonga Daniel Sandoval & Juanita Sandoval 12820 Chervil Street, Rancho Cucamonga GNO G~G~~~~NGP N C~~ ~~ RP PN ~~ 2~0~ \NG N PN ~~~E~v~° "P~ On the County of San Bernardino Assessor's Map, Book 227, Page 2I please see the properties that we are concerned about. Lourdes and Enck Tirguaos are the Property Owners of Lot # 32 and Lot #33 Gail Tims rs the Property Owner of Lot #34. Daniel Sandoval and Juanita Sandoval are the Property Owners of Lot #35. Etiwanda Apartments - Lnpad On Our Homestead Properties We are a concerned community of home owners who are scekmg to postpone ffie public hearing on ]anuary 9th to allow us adequate time to research and present our concerns to the city. First of all, two of the above mentioned property owners were not informed of this meeting until Daniel Sandoval the other property owner personally contacted them. This meeting came as quite a shock to them since they were not prepared to resptatd. As a community we have discussed the rmpad that thu development would have ~ our oommundy If the Etiwanda Gardens Apartments were to be developed around our properties these issues would need to be addressed and eventually resolved. • Ads of Crrme would be more likely to occur due to the Increased Population that would result frown this developmcet, regardles ofthe "upscale" designatron ofthese apartment buildings. (As cmrsulted by an experienced Police Officer this is a known fad.) • Property Devahtation would most rely occur or stagnate before, during and a8a this development. This would adversely affect the investments of these property owners. • Difficulty to Lnprove this community would result if the block wall proposed by the development were to be put in place before property owners have time to research making the following improvements: / Residential Paved Road with sidewalks to mtprove saws to these properties and prevent erosic® of existing road. / Drainage route from properties would be limited by proposed block wall without adequate planning and ro-routing. / Installation of a sews system in the future may not be posible attar surrounding development is oompletod. / Upgrade of wale Imes and public utilities for these properties may not be posible a8er surrounding development is completed. ~~ ~ ~ / Aesthctrc issues such as, loss of mountain new, rural nature of the surrounding property, and increased noise and traffic due to the apartment development. / Construction of a block wall azound our properties, especially along the existing dint road should the developer choose to purchase Lot #22 and Lot #23 leaving the other propertes, would limit the ability fm vehicles to turn around on our road, would result in a potential fire hazard should future construction on our road be requved since there would be no access by fire trucks to our properties As property owners we feel like our concerns have not been given the forum to be addressed and resolved. All mectings to this point with the developers or the cny have been prunarily focused on informing us what ~s planned to go in around us rather than seriously consrdering our rnncerns. We have attempted to point out some of our concerns but to our knowledge these issues have not been formally recorded nor given any attention towards resolving these potential problems that caild resuh due to the development being started before we could take any action. We respectfully request that the scheduled public hearing be postponed until we have been given adequate time and council to formally address, research, and eventually resolve our concerns. According to the Notice of Public Hearing received by the Sandoval's the final statement alarms us to the posstlnltty that only those issues raised at the public hearing would be subject to challcege m a court of law. f`'~r ~Gail_7'arris Also in concernment with the above raised need to postpone the public hearing to allow time and munc~l for. mg theiyr olm~ are property owners of Lot #2 ce Rusting, and Lpt,#23, Don Glover. Jop sling Don Glover r1 LJ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE January 9, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT-A public heanng to consider certifying the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approving the Statement of Facts and Findings and Ovemding Considerations for the proposed protect known as Victona Gardens, a mixed use development consisting of approximately 2 45 million square feet of retail, office, and awc uses, as well as up to 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land The project site is within the City boundary and the Victona Community Plan and is generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west - APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24, and 39 through 43 The applicant has requested a continuance of the public heanng on these items to January 23, 2002, to allow time to coordinate the vanous documents for internal consistency and quality control CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three, 4-foot by 8-foot public heanng signs, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 600-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the public heanng for Environmental Impact Report for Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01, Development Agreement 01-02, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 to January 23, 2002, without further public notice Respectfully submitted, • Brad Buller City Planner BB NF/1c iTEM P u RANCtlO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 9, 2002 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY• Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTAND DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT01-02 - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to establish a Development Agreement and the detailed rewew of a master plan for a project known as Victoria Gardens, amixed-use development consisting of approximately2.45 million square feet of retail, office, and avic uses, as well as 600 multiple family residential units, on approwmately 175 acres of land. The protect site is within the City boundary and the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west-APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23;227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to subdivide approximately 147 acres of land into 97 parcels and 39 lettered lots (private and public streets) to accommodate the proposed protect known as Victoria Gardens on approwmately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38; 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan by changing the land use designation from Regional Center to Mixed Use and modifying various text sections and graphics in the Community Plan to accommodate the proposed protect known as Victoria Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west-APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23; 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 ITEMS Q-S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA 01-02, VCPA 01-01, TPM 15716 FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC. January 9, 2002 Page 2 The applicant has requested a continuance of the public heanng on these items to January 23, 2002, to allow time to coordinate the vanous documents for internal consistency and quality control. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three, 4foot by 6-foot public hearing signs, and notices were mailed to all propertyowners Hnthin a 600-foot radws of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the public hearing for Development Agreement 01-02, Victona Community Plan Amendment0l-01, and Tentative Parcel Map 15716 to January 23, 2002, vwthout further public notice. Respectfull submitted, Brad uller . Cily Planner BB:Btsc Q-S 2 • it T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: January 9, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-25 (RODRIGUEZ), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-17 (CHEVRON) -Review of the Design Guidelines supplement for an approved Master Planned shopping center including a 2,900 square foot drive-thru restaurant (Burger King), 5,548 square foot restaurant (previouslyZendelas), and 2,740 square foot service station with dnve-thru carwash . (Chevron) on 10 acres of land in the Community Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-211-12 and 13. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 95-25 on May 14, 1997, for a master planned shopping center. The Commission required design guidelines, as they had for other shopping centers, because the master plan did not include complete elevations for the maloranchor or the majority of the buildings The site also required special design sensitivity with the histonc Klusman House on the property The adequacy of the design guidelines processed with the Conditional Use PermiUmaster plan was a key issue dunng the Planning Commission's deliberation The Commission allowed the protect to be approved without the guidelines but placed a condition on the approval requiring guidelines to be prepared priorto issuance of building permits for Phase I (the Burger King restaurant). In 1998, the applicant submitted a revised set of design guidelines that did not meet with approval by the Design Review Committee or Planning Commission. The Commission then issued a condition modification to delay preparation of the design guidelines until lust prior to issuing the building permits for Phase II. This was to allow the applicant to seek approval of a building permit for the Burger King restaurant (which has not yet occurred) without having to develop an approvable set of design guidelines. The site is now under consideration for a new Chevron service station, which alters the Slte Plan. The Design Guidelines are now intended to satisfy the original Conditional Use Permit 95-25 master plan requirement as well as provide a design framework for review of the Chevron protect. Note that CUP 95-25 will expire in May of 2002 with no provision for extension unless a building permit is . Issued. No permits have yet been issued and none of the bwldings within the project are currently In plan check. ITEM T PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Design Gwdelmes for CUP 95-25 and CUP 00-17 January 9, 2002 • Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The Design Gwdelmes state that, °the architectural theme of the project draws on aesthetic cues from the Winery vernacular (such as Thomas Brother's Wmery).° The architectural guidelines provide for use of California Bam Style architecture as a symbol of the winery culture Conceptual building elevations are included that incorporate corbel supported towers, exposed rafter tails, stone covered columns/walls, archways, multi-paned windows, hip style roofs, and trellis features. The Gwdelmes include an architectural palate of fapade articulation, walls, towers and roofs, accents, and areas subject to public view. These are all handled m the text of the Gwdelmes There is an appendix showing how these features could be assembled into bwldmgs. A plant list is included based off of the Foothill Boulevard zoning information m the Development Code. B. Desion Review Committee• The Design Guidelines were reviewed by the Design Review Committee on July 31, 2001, and the Committee asked to see the Gwdelmes revised and brought back for further review. The Committee reviewed revised Gwdelmes on October 16, 2001, and found them to be acceptable with one exception; the previously approved Burger King and Zendejas building designs were not up to par with the overall Guidelines. The Committee reviewed a third set of revised Gwdelmes incorporating updated designs for the Burger Kmg and Zendejas bwldmgs on November 6, 2001, and recommend approval. Please refer to the attached Design Review Committee Action Agendas for further details. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the subject Design Gwdelmes by minute action Respecttully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLCUs Attachments Exhibit "A° - DRC Action Agendas (July 31, October 16, and November 6, 2001) Exhibit °B° -Design Gwdelmes • T2 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p m Brent Le Count July 31, 2001 UJt YtKIVII l yy-OJ (VVHL IVIHKII, HIVU I,VIV UII IVIVHL VJC 1'CRIVII I VU-I / lVf7CV RViV1 - Review of the Design Guidelines supplement for an approved Master Planned shopping center consisting of a proposed large retail store (Wal Mart), a Burger King fast food restaurant (approved under Conditional Use Permit 95-25), a proposed Chevron service station with drive-thru carwash, and five other pad buildings on 17 64 acres of land in the Medium Residential Disthct (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) locate at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN 207-211-05, 06, 12-15, 36, 38, and 40 Background The Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Penult 95-25 on May 14,1997, for a master planned shopping center. The adequacy of the design guidelines processed with the Conditional Use PermiUmaster plan was a key issue during the Planning Commission's deliberation. The Commission allowed the protect to be approved without the guidelines but placed a condition on the approval requiring guidelines to be prepared, pnor to issuance of building permits for Phase I (the Burger King restaurant). In 1998, the applicant submitted a revised set ofdesign guidelines that did not meet with approval by Design Review Committee or Planning Commission. The Commission then Issued a condition modification to delay preparation of the design guidelines until pnor to Phase II building permits This would allow the applicant to seek approval of a building permit for the Burger King restaurant (which has not yet occurred) without having to develop an approvable set of design guidelines. The site is now under consideration for a new Wal Mart store and a Chevron service station, which • radically alters the Site Plan The design guidelines are now Intended to satisfy the original Conditional Use Permit 95-25 master plan requirement as well as provide a design framework for review of the Wal Mart and Chevron protects. Previous Desion Review Comments• Past design guidelines were reviewed by the Design Review Committee in 1997 and 1998, some of the key Committee comments were: The Design Guidelines should be comprehensive, particularly to InGude text explaining how the various architectural styles and amenities relate to each other in the big picture. Page 8 of the guidelines refers to a mixture of Spanish Revival and Winery archdectural styles. Beyond that, there is little text or methodology described in the guidelines that pulls the protect together Into one cohesive development A stronger sense of unity and greater explanation should be provided to explain how the accent elements will provide a sense of unity and cohesiveness, yet provide variation within the overall theme The unifying theme should also apply to street furniture and Ilghtfixtures The proposed unifying theme appears to be the mixture of Spanish Rewva/ and Winery architectural styles wdh some sort of transd~on between the two. Missing is any significant explanation of how this unity will be achieved. 3 Pad buildings adtacent to the Klusman House should not compete with the scale and style of the building These buildings should be single-story. The guidelines provide for Spanish Revival architectural style for the new building (Chevron) west of the Klusman House but . there is no explanation forhow this will be achieved without competing with Klusman. There Is reference to two-story buildings instead of a one-story height limitation. 1 Z DRC COMMENTS CUP 95-25 - RODRIGUEZ, July 31, 2001 Page 2 CUP 99-63 WAL MART, CUP 00-17 -CHEVRON Staff Comments. The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: Architecture -Page 8, "Architectural Design Elements" indicates that the Spanish Removal architectural style of the Klusman House and Winery style consistent with Rancho Cucamonga hentage and surrounding development shall be the architectural styles/themes for development of the site. This approach is consistent with the design intent for this site per the Development Code but the content of the pages 9 thru 14 fad to establish enforceable guidelines for pulling the architectural features together into a cohesive project. These pages contain little more than a compilation of photographs of architectural elements with mammal text or callouts None of the images have a Winery theme except perhaps the Zendetas and Burger King elevations already approved; however, there is no text that descnbes why these represent the Winery style The "Transition area from Wineryto Mediterranean Architecture sketch on page 10 has no apparent relationship to any of the buildings shown on the Site Plan (Site Plan shows pad bwldmgs, sketch on page 10 shows in-line retail) and there are no callouts descnbing how the transition occurs or at least noting building features representative of the two architectural styles Similarly, the Zendelas and Burger King approved elevations on pages 10 and 11 have no callouts or accompanying text describing how and why these are expressions of the Winery style. • Please note attached Exhibit "A," an excerpt from applicable Development Code design provisions for development around the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard This information provides an excellent framework and model within which the proposed design guidelines should be compiled. 2. Wal Mart - The Wal Mart building and associated pad buildings are induded on the Site Plan in the guidelines but there is no discussion of what design guidelines apply to these bwldmgs or even how the evolving mission themed design currently under review by the Design Review Committee for Wal Mart fits into the context of the proposed guidelines. Likewise, none of the elevations for Wal Mart are included in the gwdelines There should be significant coordination between the Wal Mart design team and the applicant's design team to establish a useable set of cohesive gwdelines for the overall protect Landscaping -The landscape design information starting on page 23 does not reference the Spanish Revival or Winery architectural styles though both of these styles have associated landscape themes Furthermore, there should be discussion of how landscaping will be used to enhance the transition from Spanish Revival to Winery architecture as noted on page 8 There are Palm trees shown on the Site Plan (typical of Spanish Revival theme) but Palms do not appear on the "Plant List" on page 27 The guidelines state that "at least 90 percent of the plants selected in non-turf areas shall be indigenous to the climate of the region;" however, the plant list on page 27 includes many non-native plants. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the proposed gwdelines be revised in light of the above comments and any further comments the Committee may have and brought back for further review Design Review Committee Action • Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Brent Le Count DRC COMMENTS CUP 95-25 - RODRIGUEZ, CUP 99-63 WAL MART, CUP 00-17 -CHEVRON July 31, 2001 Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 003 -WAL MART The applicant requested that the item be pulled off the agenda to provide additional time for plan revisions Design Review Committee Action: Members Present• Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Brent Le Count The Committee requested that the Design Guidelines be revised in light of staffs comments with the following additional comments. It is not necessary to follow the Spanish Revival architectural style established by the Klusman House for development of the protects. The winery theme consistent with Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard zoning is appropriate for buildings along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue • 2 Various features from the approved design concept for Wal Mart shall be incorporated into the various pad buildings to achieve a level of visual continuity 3. The Design Guidelines shall establish a palette of architectural and landscape design features for designers of the various pad bwldmgs to choose from The Guidelines shall also include design concepts/examples of how the architectural features palette could be expressed for a retail building, drive-thru, and Chevron. 4 The Committee is opposed to the use of red the roofing for bwldmgs within the protect. The applicant's representative, Joe Ramos, agreed to revised the Design Guidelines to be consistent with the Committee's direction. TS DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 30 p m Brent Le Count October 16, 2001 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-25 (RODRIGUEZ), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-17 (CHEVRON) - Review of the Design Guidelines supplement for an approved Master Planned shopping center including a 2,900 square footdnve thru restaurant (Burger King), and a 5,548 square foot restaurant (previously Zendelas), and 2,740 square foot service station with dnve thru carwash (Chevron) on 10 acres of land in the Community Commercial Distnct, located on the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN 207- 211-12anil 13 Background The Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 95-25 on May 14,1997, for a master planned shopping center The adequacy of the design guidelines processed with the Conditional Use PermiUmaster plan was a key issue during the Planning Commission's deliberation The Commission allowed the protect to be approved without the guidelines but placed a condition on the approval requinng gwdelmes to be prepared, pnor to issuance of bwlding permits for Phase I (the Burger King restaurant) In 1998, the applicant submitted a revised set of design guidelines that did not meet with approval by Design Review Committee or Planning Commission The Commission then issued a condition modification to delay preparation of the design gwdelmes until pnor to Phase II building permits. This would allow the applicant to seek approval of a budding permit for the Burger King restaurant (which has not yet occurred) v~nthout having to develop an approvable set of design guidelines. The site is now under consideration for a new Chevron service station (the Wal-Mart protect is on hold at the request of the applicant), which alters the Site Plan The design gwdelmes are now intended to satisfy the onginal Conditional Use Permit 95-25 master plan requrement as well as provide a design framework for rewew of the Chevron protect The Design Guidelines were reviewed by the Design Review Committee on July 31, 2001 and the Committee asked to see the guidelines revised and brought back for further review Desion Review Comments from July 31, 2001: ft is not necessary to follow the Spanish Revival archdectural style established by the Kluseman House for development of the protects The winery theme consistent with Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard zoning is appropnate for buildings along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue The revised Design Guidelines state that, "the architectural theme of the pro/ect drawn on aesthebc cues from the Winery vernacular (such as Thomas Brother's Winery)." The archdectural gwdelmes provide for use of Cal~fomia Bam Style arohdecture as a symbol of the winery culture. Conceptual building elevations are included that incorporate corbel supported towers exposed raftertads, stone covered columns/wa/ls, archways, multi-paned windows, hip style roofs, and trellis features Vanous features from the approved design concept for Wal-Mart shall be incorporated into the vanous pad bwldings to achieve a level of casual conUnwty The Wal-Mart project has been placed on hold Therefore, the current guidelines only cover the existing approved Rodnguez Master Planned shopping centerand the Chevron project now under rewew and consideration. DRC COMMENTS DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CUP 95-25 - RODRIGUEZ & CUP 99-17 -CHEVRON • October 16, 2001 Page 2 3. The Design Gwdelmes shall establish a palette of architectural and landscape design features for designers of the various pad bwldings to choose from The Gwdelmes shall also include design concepts/examples of how the architectural features palette could be expressed for a retail budding, drive-thru, and Chevron The gwdelmes include an arohitectural palate of,' fagade arbcula6on, walls, towers and roofs, accents, and areas subject to public view. These are all handled in the text of the guidelines There is an appendix showing how these features could be assembled into bwldings. A plant list is included based off of the Foothdl8oulevard zoning information in the Development Code 4. The Committee is opposed to the use of red file roofing for bwldings within the protect. The guidelines specify wood shingle, slate or earth tone colored metal roofing matena/s. Staff does not suggest inclusion of wood shingles unless of artificial manufacture nor any metal roofing (other than real copper roofing if rt can be shown to fit wdh the Vineyard arohitectural theme Other Comments 1. The parking lot landscaping section on Page 15 should be revised to reduce parking stall • depth by 1-foot (2 feet speafied) down to 17 feet overall (1-foot overhang) per the Development Code. 2. The landscape section should include a regwrement to place larger Vees at site entry points and to accentual budding entrances Also, while the minimum regwrement for tree planting is 1 tree per 30 feet of bwlding wall/protect perimeter, the guidelines should emphasize substantial tree, shrub, and groundcover planting to establish a lush landscaped image 3 The landscape section should include a statement that the protect well conform to the ActJUtty Center hard scape and landscape concept established by the Foothill Boulevard Plan 4 Drive-thru screening on Page 16 should include low rock covered walls in addition to landscaped berms. 5 Future bwiding pads should be irrigated and hydro seeded until construction occurs. 6. Site Plan vignettes seem to show Palm tree planting but the Plant Liston Page 18 does not include Palms 7 Section L on Page 19 "Other Site Improvements" should discuss decorative paving at driveway entrance points and at on-site driveway intersections The Design Review Committee should discuss whetheror not the Burger King and Zendetas bwiding elevations are consistent with the conceptual bwldng elevations for the other bwldings in the protect per the Design Gwdelmes • Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Revew Committee approve the proposed Design Gwdelmes subtect to the above comments T r~- DRC COMMENTS DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CUP 95-25 - RODRIGUEZ & CUP 99-17 -CHEVRON October 16, 2001 • Page 3 Design Review Committee Action Members Present• Larry McNiel, John Mannenno, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Brent Le Count The Committee recommended approval of the proposed Design Guidelines subtect to staffs comments and the following additional comment. Restudy the existing Burger King and Zendetas building treatment/extenordesign to confonn to the provisions of the proposed Design Guidelines This is subtect to review bythe Design Review Committee, pnor to scheduling for Planning Commission review. Ta DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 7 00 p.m Brent Le Count November 6, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-17 -CHEVRON - A request to construct a new 2,740 square foot service station with convenience market, drive-thru carwash and pump island on 1-acre of land in the Community Commeraal District (Subarea 2) located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard west of Vineyard Avenue - APN 207-211-12, and 13. The Design Rewew Committee reviewed the protect on October 16, 2001 and requested that the project be redesigned in light of staffs comments and the following additional comments The applicant agreed to make the requested changes and come back before the Committee for further review. 1 The Committee v~nll not require modification of the corporate Floor Plan or building plotting but is unwilling to accept Chevron signature architecture in this case as d conflicts with the proposed Design Guidelines, design goals for Foothill Boulevard, and the surrounding development Incorporate architectural features, colors, and landscaping conforming to the proposed Design Guidelines that foster a winery theme. The revised building design incorporates more over rock veneer (manufactured), wood corbels, and exposed rafter tads all of which am elements of the winery theme and are consistent wdh the Design Guidelines but the overall building design has not changed substantially from the original submittal While certain appropriate arohdecture/features are . present, the budding somehow misses the mark and is still very much a "corporate prototype" design based on a large stucco box. It does not conform to the sketches in the Design Guidelines for the Rodriguez masterplanned shopping centerof which Chevron is a part. 2 Prowde greater pop-0ut dimensions and column depth for wall features to foster a more substantial appearance similar to the concept drawings associated with the proposed Design Gwdelines. Column projections/pop outs range from 8 inches to 11 inches away from the main wall surface. This is a nominal dimension at best and should be increased to something on the order of three feet to avoid a wallpapered or stuck-on appearance Columns supporting overhead trellises are still spindly and should be substantially increased in width similar to the existing service station at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Wall mounted treillage is proposed to be wooden and should be changed to minimum 2 inches member painted metal 3 Restudy parking lot layout at the southeast comer of the site and to the south of the site per the sketch prepared by Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, and shown to the Committee and applicant (see copy attached) to avoid vast areas of asphalt paving and vehicle arculaUon conflicts The driveway entrance at the southeast comer of the Chevron site has been reduced to 60 feet in width, which is acceptable The parting field south of the sde has been reconfigured but does not conform to Committee d~rect~on. The padang area should be revised per the . attached sketch. The recommended modification results in a loss of 16 parking spaces but there are 38 surplus spaces available so there would still be 22 surplus spaces after the modification. This is a nominal tradeoff considering the convenience and safety afforded by the recommended modifications. Eliminate starburst pattern from north/south driveway or restudy location to fit better with the Chevron Site Plan T°~ DRC COMMENTS CUP 00-17 -CHEVRON November 6, 2001 . Page 2 Additional Comments: Prowde Crape Myrtle tree planting along the Foothill Boulevard frontage consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Activity Center theme 2. When the application was onginally submitted, the existing mature trees lust west ofthe site were to remain untouched. The current Site Plan shows these trees to be removed The trees should be preserved if possible These appear to be off-site trees so their removal should not be necessary Permission from the property owner and a Tree Removal Penrnt wall be necessary in order to remove the trees. 3 Note that east faang doors and openings will be subject to excessive seasonal winds. Suggest a double door foyer to mitigate this. 4. Prowde tnm/sun•ounds with decorative profiles to accentuate archways/overhangs This tnm shall be of a different color than the main stucco field color. 5 Continue arched treatment from the tower to the other sides of the tower. 6 Windows should be multi-paned consistent with the proposed design gwdelines for the center and to compliment the gnd established by the wall-mounted trellises. 7 The Engineenng Division is willing to support the western dnvewayoff of Foothill Boulevard subject to it being gated off to customer traffic The gate shall be automatically operated so that it is open the minimum length of time for a gas delivery truck to exit the site and shall be made of decorative wrought iron framed with rock covered pilasters. Intensified landscaping shall be provided along the frontage of the site to conceal the existence of this driveway. Policy Issues The follovnng items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion All roof- and ground-mounted equipment shall be fully screened The site sits well below the Albertson's site to the north, which will pose a design challenge for any roof-mounted equpment or satellite dishes. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised and brought backforfurther review. Attachment Design Review Committee Action Members Present. Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Brent Le Count The Committee reviewed the revised plans and found that the new design was not substantially different from past designs that had been retected The applicant submitted another set of revised plans at the meeting that had increased nver rock application along the base of the building The Committee found this design to be a nominal increase in quality The Committee reminded the applicant that it would be necessary to follow the Design Guidelines for the Rodriguez master planned shopping center of which the protect is a part The applicant claimed that the revised design does conform to the guidelines and asked the Committee to explain why it does not The T ~o DRC COMMENTS CUP 00-17 -CHEVRON . November 6, 2001 Page 3 Committee requested that the protect be revised and brought back forfurther review in light of staffs comments and the following additional comments. 1, Reduce roof pitch on tower element to match the Gwdelines 2 Increase the height and mass of the overall roof area to balance the budding and avoid a tacked on, mansard-like appearance. 3 The columns that support the trellises should match those shown in the Guidelines 4, The fascia and exposed rafter tad details (including rafter spaang) should match those shown m the gwdelines. 5. Windows should have some form of cut ups to add visual interest and be consistent with the Gwdelines. 6. Section A-A shows approximately 6 feet of fill along west protect boundary If a retaining wall is necessary to support this fill it shall be decorative, preferably covered with nver rock If no retaining wall is to be constructed here off-site grading will be necessary and the applicant shall obtain authonzation for such grading from the San Bernardino County Flood Control Disthct, pnor to scheduling for Planning Commission. . 7 Provide decorative profile cornice around the car wash bulding or provide a pitched rooftted into the remainder of the building. 8. Provide decorative tnm around the archwayon the towerfeature and elsewhere to enhance the appearance of the budding and avoid a boxy stucco look. 9. Provide more corbels on the tower feature consistent with the Guidelines The applicant expressed substantial reluctance to cooperate with anyfurther redesign Brad Buller, City Planner, offered to meet with the applicant to help them with a redesign effort. The applicant agreed to meet with Mr. Buller ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG~ OCT 31 ppp~ RECEIVED -PLANNING DESIGN GUIDELINES Southwest Corner of Foothill and Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California Prepared by Joe Ramos Architects For U.S. Properties T12 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION .............. 3 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ELEMENTS ........... 7 SITE AMENITIES AND ACCESSORIES ...............8 EXTERIOR LIGHTING ....................................11 LANDSCAPE/HARDSCAPE ..............................13 APPENDICES ......................................................19 I. KLUSMAN HOUSE II. APPROVED BUILDING ELEVATIONS BUILDINGS A & B III. PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS BUILDINGS D, E, & F T ~3 2 I. INTRODUCTION This Planned Development project is approximately 10 acres in size, which will provide mixed-use retail for shopping for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and rts surrounding commumdes. The site is located at the Southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyazd Avenue. Vineyazd Avenue has interchanges at San Bernardino Freeway making one major artery for the area. The azea North of the Site, across Foothill Boulevazd, is a new developed shopping center. The area east of the Site, across Vineyard Avenue, is commercial and residential development To the South is a two story residential community. To the West of the site is the San Beniardino County Flood Control District Channel. The proposed project is a commercial shopping center containing over 80,000 squaze feet of gross floor area The uses planned for the center include retail shoppmg, general merchandtse, grocery, eating establishments and service station. The type of use, number and location of buildings, and site design may he modified m final design in accordance with the development standazds, permitted uses, building envelope, and conditions of approval. Given the scope of this project, development may occur in phases. T ~"` s i • Q w J m J_ r 0 0 LL u 3nr~,v aava3NN _ _ i a I ~~--{~{ I ~~ ~ ~~ W ~~ ',~ ~ ~ L NOW~3i7 \~ 91 mY -~ ~~ G ,s ~~ V _<~ Q If development is phased, the fast phase would likely encompass pazcel 1; and the second . phase including parcel 2 with major tenant. The entire project will provide ample pazking at a ratio of 5 stalls per 1000 sq. of building azea. The site will provide customer access at two mayor points One is located along Vineyazd Avenue and one on Foothill Boulevard. An exit only access located on Foothill for the service center will also be provided The project is sited with generous landscape buffers to the east and north, along Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The setbacks are consistent with the City's Zomng Ordinances, and will provide a landscaping design that will mimic the rolling lulls of the surrounding commumty. The comer parcel at this project has been carefully studied The design insures seamless . integration for internal traffic and pedestnan access, and provides for unproved vehicular It 5 • access via generous deceleration lanes. A bus stop along Vineyazd Avenue has been integrated with the site layout The architectural style, and features are compatible with and complunentary to the overall aesthetic of the project. The design intent for the project is one of compatibility of all new buildings with the Winery themed developments surrounding the property; but also respect the chazacter of the I{]usman House, a histonc building on site (See Appendix 2) The city of Rancho Cucamonga Development code Sections 17 32 080 designated the site as a sigmficant part of "Sub-azea 2". The Thomas Brothers Winery determines the azea's architectural style as defined by the Development Code. To conform to the area's character the azchutectural theme of the project draws on aesthetic queues from the Winery vemaculaz. • ~~ 6 H. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ELEMENTS . A. Objective The objective for architectural design is to create a distinctive but compatible building Image that will portray a design theme consistent with the Ctty's winery hentage B. Architectural Elements 1. Fagade Articulation a The Thomas Brothers Winery is the style determinant in this area as specified in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. The main buildings at the Thomas Brothers Winery do not portray "special" architectural features other than a grape arbor and multiple shed roofs The azclutecture is representative of the Califorma Barn Style. The simple clean lines of the barn m profile provide almost an unlimited range of azchitectural expressions. The barn silhouette is universally recognized as • a symbol of the winery culture and is uniquely sorted to serve as the pnmary azctutectural prototype for this azea. Repeated use of building matenals, color, and basic azclutectural elements, can be expanded so that proposed buildings can be designed in harmony with the basic contextual feel of the winery (See Appendix 3 for conceptual elevations.) 2. Walls a. Use textured or smooth stucco, clapboazd, boazd and batten siding, vertical wood siding, bnck, cobblestone, nver rock, and fieldstone. b. The Buildings shall contain an identifiable base, extending two or more feet up from the finished grade. This base may incorporate texture vanations, brick, stone, and a projection or break m the wall color. c. The base matenal should be highly resistant to damage; defacing and general wear and teaz. Bnck, River rock, Cobblestone, and fieldstone are examples of acceptable base material. • ~~ ~ . 3. Towers and Roofs a Gable, lup or shed roofs with roof pitch at 3:12 to 6 12 b. Use simulated wood shingle, slate or earth tone colored concrete tile. c. Incorporate tower elements or other vertical architectural features on "ends" of shopping center, which do not exceed twice the height of the building they aze attached to. d. Hat roofs, mansazds and veneer pazapets aze strongly discouraged in favor of full roof treatments, such as gable, lup, or shed roof e. A vareety of roof types are encouraged. Distinct and interesting rooflines instead of flat roofed structures are recommended 4 Accents a. Vine arbors, covered walkway. b. Roof overhangs over entrees. c Multi-lighted windows • d. Porches e. Exposed rafter tails 5. Areas Subject to Public View a. Each wall surface visible from a street, parking lot or adjacent property should be treated as a mayor facade and should be designed for public view. These areas should also be appropnately landscaped. r 1 U T~ \ 8 III. SITE AMENITIES AND ACCESSORIES i. Courtyards and plazas Where applicable, plaza users should be provided with a choice between active (i e watching goings-on) and passive (i a pnvate) seating Passive Seating 2. Fountains A fountain will be installed at the location mchcated on the plan Design of fountain shall be submitted for review and approval pnor to installation • Teo 9 Active Seating 3. Bicycle racks Bicycle racks shall be conveniently located at entrances of each building or per approved site plan and piamm~g department requvement. 4. Bus shelters Bus shelters shall be customized to the overall design of the surrounding building SHAi4i TILE 7'O MATCH ADJACENT BUILDINGS I I ~ ~ ~ v~ COMPOSITE t FIBER HENCFI~ PRECAST ~~~ CONCRETE _ ~_ NA1YiRAL _ __ _- __ [-?~ R[VER ROCK °-° ""MBER FRAMING TZ\ to 5. Trash Enclosures Trash bms shall be located withm an approved solid trash enclosure, per City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code standards FRONT £,LEVATION - - wvFn RocK ~ coacasns aux~c w- mctiro rxx~t-Re iT0 MA1CH ApIACEI.T 817({,~NG6 vptr~a u~rnc:s SIDE ELRVATIO\ The trash enclosure shall be constructed of the same matenals and fimshes as the pnmary bwlding. ~Z Z 11 ~- Y ~ 1 7RR WS W! YINYIE LATflLB • N. EXTERIOR LIGHTING A. Objective a. The objective for exterior lighting ~s to create a nighttime environment that promotes safe movement of veluculaz and pedestrian traffic, wlule offering a d~stmctrve visual aesthetic for the project and tenants. In addition, cazeful considerations will be given to avoid adverse impact on the surrounding developments b. Lighting should be designed to satisfy both functional and decorative needs All security lighting should be designed as part of an overall lighting plan rather than as single stand alone elements B. Safety and Security: a. Safety should be ensured through use of. • Adequate security lighting for pazkmg azeas and pedestrian way • A m,n,mum of 1 foot candle illumination for all azeas • Lumted access (walls. fences. gates. shrubs) • Signage • Introduction of activities (e.g , reaz entrances for commercial activities) that increase surveillance • Surveillance through windows or wrth cameras, • Ongoing maintenance of storage azeas and alleys • b. As a security device, lighting should be adequate t-/GKrnvG .axsvrccs .syUCrv rM~e but not overl bn t. ~sTR/.IN 3L1C.t' Gyuca pr Y Y~ uGNrrn,~ srrrs ~ surer faro ~ ~(yROncrq~ /~R /15' MFt9!(rxo G6~' c .Light fixture shall be '~ ~'~'~~~ ~~ r»t~ ~~~' 1L6t.K G1fAlC~L7lSt GT YN!= designed to cast light cva.viNG ae downwazds to avoid glaze. ~'/l+'~`°A d. All building entrances should be well lighted The lighting should be designed so that the lighting is an attractive element m its own right, acting as a public amenity. e. Parking lot lighting shall have a maximum height of 15'-0" . • ~2.3 12 C. Aesthetic Design: There are essentially three types of pazlung lot lighting fixtures -Floodlight, Semi-Cutoff and Cutoff Both the Floodlight and Semi-Cutoff produce significant light output above 90 degrees. This results m high angle glaze which can be discomforting and disabling to dnvers, creating unsafe conditions In addition, the Cutoff type fixture is the best product for controlling light trespass to adjacent properties. It is for these reasons that all fixtures used in the pazking and service azeas meet the stnct industry standazds for fight cutoff 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Recommended Light Fixtures D. Energy Savings Use of energy efficient lighting in this project not only helps preserve our scarce energy resources, but also helps protect our environment. The reduction in fossil fuel usage reduces the amount of cazbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxide released into the atmosphere. Therefore all lighting fixtures will comply with the State of California minunum energy standards. U n L_J T 2-y 13 • V. LANDSCAPE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Objectives: The resulting design will provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a pleasant and distinctive setting within the project that strengthens the site plan, enhances building elevations, softens parking areas, buffers service areas and maintains continuity with the public way • Reinforce mayor veluculaz /pedestrian systems. • Provide for human scale and visual organization of parking space • Provide screening of loading azeas, sernce azeas and utility /service equipment. • Conform to the achv~ty center handscape and landscape concept established by the Foothill Boulevazd Plan. • Emphasize substantial tree, shrub, and groundcover planting to establish a lush landscape inage . B. Landscape Setbacks 1. Landscape setbacks shall comply with Rancho Cucamonga's development code and Xenscape gwdelmes All front and side yazds occunmg adjacent to a street nght-of--way shall be landscaped. Street frontage shall include lawn and/or ground cover azeas with a city approved five-foot wide sidewalk. Pazkmg lots shall have a muumum intenor penmeter planting area twenty-five feet (25') in width. 2. Trees shall be planted at an equivalent of one for every 30 feet minimum of frontage. The approved street tree along Vineyazd Avenue is Platanus acenfolia "Yarwood." 3. Lazger trees shall be placed at site entry points C. Free Standing Tenant Pads: 1 Landscaping shall occur at either the pad perimeter or adjacent to building walls at street frontage. Tlis assumes that two sides accommodate pazlcing. Otherwise, all sides of the building shall be landscaped TZ ~ 14 2. Additional landscaping over and above the dimensions given for front, side and reaz yazds and tenants pads m the landscape plan is encouraged as long as it is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinances and any applicable zero maintenance guidelines adopted by the City. 3. Plant material adjacent to building shall complement the other aspects of the Center's overall landscape design Accent plant matenals aze encouraged at small, key locations to provide contrast and interest Same tree species shall be planted in groupings or an individual box specimen tree may be planted for impact to emphasize specific areas. 4 Building entrances shall be accentuated by lazge trees. D. Parking Lot /internal Landscaping: 1. A landscaping planter, sidewalk or other means, shall separate the end of each row ofpazking stalls from driveways. 2 Continuous landscape strips shall be mimmum of five feet (5') wide excluding curbing. i 3. Where standard spaces are adjacent and perpendiculaz to landscaping, the requued planting azea shall be increased two feet (2'-0") in depth by decreasing the length of the parking stall by one feet (1'-0"), down to 17'-0" mimmum. Islands at the end of pazlnng azeas shall have m,mmum interior planter dinension of six feet (ti'-0") excluding curbs Compact spaces aze excluded from these conditions. 4. All landscaped azeas shall be designed so that plant materials aze protected from vehicle damage or encroachment. s° Y Y . ~ ~ e ' v TZIP is E. Tree Planting Requirements: 1. No more than every three (3) pazkmg spaces will be allowed m any row of panng without a tree well finger from a landscape stop. 2. Mmunum tree size shall be 15 gallon. A minimum of 30% of all trees planted on site shall be 24" box or larger. F. Landscape Material selection: 1. At least 90 percent of the plants selected ninon-turf areas shall be mchgenous to the climate of the region and require minimal water once established. 2. Up to ten percent of the plants may be of anon-drought tolerant vanety as long as they aze grouped together and can be imgated sepazately. See page 27 for plant list. 3 Turf shall not exceed 25 percent of the landscaped azea. No turf shall be allowed m azeas less than eight feet (8') wide Turf will not be allowed on slopes greater than 4.1 • G. Drive-Thru Screening: Drive-thru lanes at street frontages shall be screened with heavily landscaped, 30- inch high minimum berms and 24 inch low rock covered walls to screen the view of cazs m the dove thru lane or as approved by the planning department staff ~Z~- 16 A. Future Building Areas: 1. All undeveloped and non-landscaped land area planned for future building expansion or other purposes shall be maintained and kept free of weeds, other unsightly plant growth, rubbish and debns by the property owner 2. Areas not dedicated to pazkmg or building area will be kept clear of all debns and vegetation m compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and Fire Distract Regulations. 3. Future bulldmg pad should be Imgated and hydro seeded until construction occurs I. Irrigation: 1. A fully operational automatic underground ungation system shall be provtded over all landscaped areas as part of the landscape Improvement. Either low precipitation pop-up spray, rotor, or on grade dnp Systems are encouraged for water conservation as well as coordination with the local environmental factors to minimize water usage. . 2. Irrigation methods, practices, and components shall be m comphance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga guidelines for drought tolerant landscaping and/or water conservation gwdelines, tf applicable. 3. Spnnklers located adjacent to walkways shall be pop-up type to avoid tripping pedestnans when not In use. Backflow preventers and any other above ground Imgation equtpment/fixtures shall be located within shrub plantings to screen from view. J. Plant List: (derived from R.C. SpeciSc plan for the area) ^ Crape Myrtle (Pnmary urban activity node and median species) ^ Honey Locust (Secondary urban activity and median species) ^ London Plane (Pnmary suburban pazkway and median species) ^ Cazolma Laurel (Major median species) ^ Flowering Plum (Secondary suburban pazkway and median accent tree) • T2.~ 17 K. Plant List: (derived from previously submitted landscape plan) Tree: Perennials: Crape Myrtle Lily of the Nile Canary Island Pme Dwarf Agapanthus Afncan Sumac Dayhly Bnsbane box Vanegated Linope Ivy Geramum Shrubs: Silver Lace Society Garlic Afncan Hibiscus Natal Plum Hydroseed Mix: Afncan Ins Gazama Silver King Euonymus Sweet Alyssum Lavender Califorma Poppy Spanish Lavender Texas Pivet Heavenly Bamboo Nenum Olenader Mock Orange Indian Hawthorn Upnght Rosemary Slimy Xylosma Groundcover: Serbian Bellflower Snow m Summer Star Jasmme Verbana T2~ 18 L. Other Site Improvements: Landscaping plans shall include, in addltron to landscaping and planters noted above, other public improvements such as pedestrian benches and waste receptacles conveniently located for pedestrian traffic t~1,tlft~J.tSitiF.:o?F.'•ird.:i~ :'.;a `` f ~~ ' / l~ IY~ ~ [ , qi A+'~~ i~ A ,i i i~1L1 t~ ~ f FB~~+t ,~~ fltr_>.1. ~ r1.t11< 1 1 ~ .I ~ '. 1, 5;, p~; ild}4 i r~~. ~;-- 0.tT;: !+;1 it+.~.iU ~'t4 :l l!} :LU= • . ~ . r-~ LJ ~3~ 19 • Scofield # E Russet Scofield Bli Frost Natural gray concrete w/ h tool point • "Crosswalks" at frontage access points and within the center shall be constructed ~tnth enhanced pavement or integral colored aggregate, interlocking pavers, or stamped concrete as determined by the City Planning Departrnent. Natural concretE tool tom Frost T3 ~ 20 NORTH ELEVATION • SOUTH ELEVATION THE I~LUSMAN HOUSE Tay 23 U • ~~ .. '.> BUILDING DETAILS -r-3~ 24 BUILDING `A' T3~ 26 ~, ..<,r ,~~~ ~„_r. ~~~,... . u~ }~_ 3 ~r> . •jv -=y~~~ a' ,sr a°=~ xes.~ipc. BUILDING `B' '(-3`a z~ • APPENDIX C PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS BUILDINGS D, E, F, G, & A ~~ Zs + ecurN ELEYATION NORTH ELEVATION •,,,;,,~,~y ~' ~ a -1 ~ ~ :~ E =EAST ELEVATION BUILDINGS D & E Teo 29 1~ u L_ J 90UTHEAST ELEVATION "_ _IDNazn+utvnTlo'a~ BUILDING F BUILDING G NORik ELEVdTION EAST £LEVATILN . BUILDING H BUILDINGS F, G, & H T~ 1 30 • f T H E C I T Y O F RANCtlO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE• January 9, 2001 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY• Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-81 - JAROD CROW - An appeal of the Clty Planner's decision to not require fencang along the southeasterly property line fora 2,455 square foot single-family home on 29-acre of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 8721 Predera Court - APN. 207-631-19. • BACKGROUND. On December 11, 2001, staff received a letter from the appellant, Mr. Charles Buquet, requesting a 30~1ay continuance for the appeal (Exhibit "A"). The continuance was requested to allow the applicant adequate time to demonstrate a good faith effort in Implementing a resolution that the appellant and applicant have agreed to within a specified time frame On December 12, 2001, the Planning Commission granted the appellant's request for a continuance to January 9, 2002 Attached is a letter from Samuel P. Crowe, attorney for the applicant, consenting to a 30-day continuance (Exhibit "B"). An update will be provided at the meeting RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the appeal, thereby modifying the Clty Planner's approval of DRCDR00-81 to include a condition of approval requinng fencing along the southeasterly property line through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB•DG mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" -Appellant's letter dated December 11, 2001 Exhibit "B" -Letter from Covington & Crowe dated December 13, 2001 M Exhibit "C" -Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 12, 2001 Resolution of Approval ITEM U r ~ ~. December 11, 2001 CAMpNGA cu CIS pf FAN~HO Brad Buller, City Planner 12 2001 City of Rancho Cucamonga pEC P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 RECE1VEp -PANNING Re: Appeal of Design Review for 8721 Predera Court Request for Coninuance Dear Brad: This is as a follow-up to telephone conversations with Sam Crowe, of Covington & Crowe, who represents the Crow family concerning the referenced appeal, and subsequent discussion with you this afternoon. At 11:00 a.m. today, Sam Crowe contacted me at my office and advised that his dient has agreed to the Appeal Approval Resolution that is included as part of the staff report for the December 12, 2001, Planning Commission agenda. During our conversation, Mr. Crowe confirmed that his client concurred and would voluntarily comply with Planning Division Conditions 1 through 7 listed in this document under B 4. Resolution. I have enclosed a copy of the draft resolution that lists the Conditions and this document is also incorporated by reference for any continuance contemplated now or in the future. During my conversation with you yesterday afternoon, you • confirmed that Mr. Crowe notified you of his dient's agreement and concurrence with Resolution Conditions listed in this document. Based upon all the foregoing, I am requesting athirty-day continuance to allow for implementation of the listed conditions within the timelines outlined in the Resolution document by Mr. Crowe's clients. This request is also based upon our assurance by your staff, the contractor and Mr. Crowe that his dients, as a component of their compliance activity, will also remove the windows that were installed contrary to approved plans. We appredate the courtesy and professional assistance extended to us with this appeal. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional information concerning this matter. Sincerely, c~ Charles J. Buquet 8725 Predera Court Enclosure Cc: Sam Crowe, Covington & Crowe Exhibit "A" ~Z' ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1131 West Sixth Strect, Swte 300 Ontano, Cahfomta 91762 Telephone (909) 983-9393 Facstmde (909) 391-6762 u • ~ Semuel Crowe Robert E Dougherty Donald G Hallam Robcrt E Schauer ~m ~L. Ttbbals Khymbcrh S Apaloo Edward A Ulloa Matt A Dudtcs George W Porter, Reared Maunce G Covtng[on (1909 - /997J Harold A Bathn (1930 -1988) December 13, 2001 CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEC 17 2001 Brad Buller City of Rancho Cucamonga Plamm~g Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Cahforma 91730 Re. 8721 Predera Ct Buquet Appeal Deaz Brad: RECEIVED -PLANNING This letter will confirm my understanding with respect to Mr. Buquet's appeal regazd/ng . development conditions As you know the property rs owned by Jazed Crow and rs rn the process of completion Mr. Crow and Mr Buquet have tentatively agreed that a 6 foot wooden fence will be installed on my chent's property at grade level to a point approxrmately coterminous with Mr Buquet's home excluding lus gazage. I believe you have a more detailed footage figure rn your proposed recommendations of conditions Thereafter, the wooden fence will be reduced to a 4 foot step down at grade level to the front property tine Mr Crow would shaze 2/3 of the cost thereof and Mr Buquet would shaze 1!3 of the cost. We~oin rn Mr Buquet's request that this matter be continued for 30 days to allow us tune to reduce the foregoing to a wntten agreement Respec fully, / SAMUEL P CROWS, for '~Y~ `-- COVINGTON & CROWS, LLP SPC•km cc Jared Crow 212630 `J Exhibit "B" V`~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: December 12, 2001 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-81 -Jarod Crow-An appeal of the City Planner's decision to not require fencing along the southeasterly property line fora 2,455 square foot single-family home on 29 acre of land in the Low Residential Distnct, located at 8721 Predera Court - APN• 207-631-19. BACKGROUND On December 5, 2000, Mr Jim Gray, general contractorfortheapplicant, Mr. Jarod Crow, submitted an application for a Hillside Design Review On March 6, 2001, the Grading Committee conceptually approved the grading plan and the application was forwarded to the City Plannerfor review and action On March 12, 2001, the City Planner approved Development Review DRCDR00-8l with conditions (Exhibit "F") A General. The applicant is currently constructing the approved two-story home at 8721 Predera Court The home complies with Development Code standards for setbacks, lot coverage, allowable building envelope, and hillside grading standards The applicant's house is split-pad design, with a grade differential of 1 %=feet The split pad has been graded with finished elevations of 110 5 and 112 0 over native grades that range in elevation from 108.0 to 114.0. The lower elevation of the split-pad design is located near the southerly portion of the lot, consistent with the natural slope of the lot (Exhibit "D") No excavations orfills in excess of 5 vertical feet were approved forthe applicant's house. The applicant's house is 10 feet from the southeasterly property line, thereby exceeding the minimum setback of 5 feet The distance between the applicant and appellant's house is approximately 30 feet, the minimum required within the Low Residential Distnct is 10 feet The height of the house at the ndgeline is 26 feet 11 inches, under the 30-foot maximum allowable building envelope The difference in elevation between the appellant's lot and the applicant's lot is approximately 11 feet The appellant had previously installed a chain link fence at property line The applicant built a 4-foot retaining wall located 1 foot off the southeasterly property line that has been constructed in accordance with the approved plans (Exhibit "G") The applicant added two windows on the second floor, which face the appellants' property, contrary to the approved plans The City has issued a correction notice to remove these windows. B Appellant's Appeal Charles Buquet, adjacent propertyownerto the south (Exhibit "C"), is appealing the City Planner's decision to not require side yard fencing atop the existing 4 foot retaining wall along the southeasterly property line between the applicant's house and the appellant's house The appellant Exhibit "C" ~-~`~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPEAL OF DRCDR00 - 81 December 12, 2001 Page 2 states that the lack of fencing has resulted in an "invasion of pnvacy and penmeter security fencing breach" (Exhibit "E") The appellant further states that the City Planner's decision to not regwre fencing is contrary to the regwrements of the Development Code C Response to the Appeal The appellant states that lack of a condition of approval requiring the applicant to install penmeter fenang has resulted in an invasion of pnvacy, which, the appellant contends, is contrary to the Development Code Regarding fencing within the Hillside Overlay District, Section 17 24 060-D-1 of the Hillside Development Regulations states the following "The use of open view fencing is encouraged, so long as adequate public safety and residential pnvacy are maintained " Section 17 24 060-D-1 of the Hillside Development Regulations states that "walls should not dominate views, and Section 17 08 090-C-6 of the Development Code states that fencing in residential districts is discouraged "unless needed for a specific screening or safety purpose "Section 17 08 050-B-1 of the Absolute Policy Section of the Development Code states that projects should be "compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood." D. Conclusion Because of the presence of a significant grade difference between the two properties and in the interest of sensitivityto the adjacent property, staff believes that a condition of approval requiring fencing along the southeasterly property line is a reasonable and appropriate requirement. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the appeal, thereby modifying the City Planner's approval of DRCDR00-81 to include a condition of approval requiring fencing along the southeasterly property line through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DG Is Attachments. Exhibit "A" -Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" -Location Map Exhibit "C" -Assessor's Map Exhibit "D" -Approved Grading Plan for DRCDR00-81 Exhibit "E" -Appellant's Letter dated November 14, 2001 Exhibit "F" -City Planner Approval Letterwith Conditions for DRCDR00-81 dated March 12, 2001 Exhibit "G" -Photograph of 8721 Predera Court, Looking West Along South Properly Line Resolution of Approval Exhibit "C-1" u5 VICINITY MAP ~ SITE M Exhibit "A" l~~p a Q Z ~O Q U O J W z N 3 W H 0 N O 0 N O Exhibit "B" ~~ SITE d '"" ae{ ~~~~ ns~ m x Q~ n _.~,. _ ;__~...~__.~._,_...._ _4 _~_~__.~_ Por. Tract No. 10035, M.B. 179/33-35 Os ~ s / 313 ~/ / ~~~ f , / 12 / / / °° / ey ~ / / / ~/ / / SCIIIE IA 1110 OP M IMC9 Rancho Cucamonga Cfty 4 Tox Rate Area 15011 ° !o m \ ~~ A°° rf / / ® ~ n 21 / / / J I I ~ ~ e ,,,> / / 20 4„ ~ a ,a / ° 19 / // 4 ve O~ IB / / Q 00 / 7 ~/ / F~ ~/ - - ' ~ -L,-- -- APPELLANT'S PROPERTY Assessor's Map 11 Por. SEI/4, Sec.4 Book 207 Page 63 du ~es T13-R7W San Bernardino County 1 -~ 9 ul ~~ \ ,+~. `x, . c '' lr a ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ . r ~ . 'i jv~j ~tl: .r ~ ~ ~ YtYt.t .~~a"r f _ . / h OQ 'r .~~a, Y ~~ -~ ~~ _ , ~ >., Q Y >~ $ .Y .~ at ~.: Y~i,Nti_ , r ~~ Exhibit "D" C ~c, I I j u ~ ~' ~ w .t ,~~`"N,iI F J J UI~ I p~ a ,'~ CC? ~ae N QY/N/ ~4s I'~a ~ ' 5 I V- A 1 ~ i .O j ~1-Albd .L ~,~~~~~' \ ~ / \~\ ~k s. ~ f t ` / `5i r~ f .~ CIF s =, ~M^c y , ' 1 ~ 3 I ~ . a 1 ~~ 4 4) ~~ :. Cs 6 ~$ o i I H v a n ~. ,o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 14, 2001 NOV 14 2001 . Brad Buller, City Planner RECEIVED -PLANNING City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re. Appeal of Design Review for 8721 Predera Court Dear Brad: This is as a follow-up to our meeting with you at your office on Wednesday, November 7, 2001, and extended discussion of various security and privacy issues concerning the referenced matter. At this meeting, you provided oral notice that you felt you would be unable to resolve the invasion of privacy and perimeter security fencing breach resulting from your approval of the house. As we discussed, this design review was approved without requiring privacy/security fence installation along the 160' southeastern property line, contrary to those provisions outlined in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. While we regret the need to file this appeal, we believe we need to protect our . rights under the City Design Review process. This is particularly important in light of our recent meeting discussion, where you informed us that windows have been installed by the contractor contrary to approved plans on file with the City. We have attempted to resolve our issues with the adjacent property owner in good faith for several months, with no success in this effort to date. The foregoing issues and experience explain why we have to exercise the appeal process alternative at this time. We had truly hoped that your office would be able to facilitate resolution of our concerns consistent with those requirements normally conditioned on residential projects filed with the City, which did not occur in this case. We look forward to expedient resolution of our appeal with this matter of considerable importance to our security and the peace and enjoyment of our home and property. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional information concerning this matter. Sincerely, C~ Charles J. Buquet • 8725 Predera Court, Rancho Cucamonga Exhibit "E" ~~~ T H E ~ C Y~ O F~ r ~~f~ NC KO C UC1~ MONG1~ March 12, 2001 Mr. Jim Gray James Gray Construction Co. 12960 Autumnwood Drive Victorville, CA 92392 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 00-81 Dear Mr. Gray. The Development Review process forthe above~escnbed protect has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Findings 1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. 2 The proposed protect is in accordance with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. . 3. The proposed protect, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, orwelfare or materially Intunous to properties or improvements in the warnty. 4. The proposed protect will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Conditions This protect is approved subtect to the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: Approval is for a 2,455 square foot single-family dwelling unit located at 8721 Predera Court. 2 All exposed walls, including retaining walls, shall be decorative masonry. Decorative shall mean split-face, slumpstone, or stucco ~thibit "F„ Mayor William J Alexander _ Councilmember Paul Bane Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams Councilmember Bob Dutton Jack Lam, AICP, Ctty Manager Councilmember James V Curatalo 10500 Chnc Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 (909) 477-2700 FAX (909) 477-2849 www ci ranchq-c~r~amonga ca us JIM GRAY • DR 00-81 -JAMES GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO March 12, 2001 Page 2 Front yard landscaping shall be installed. A minimum of 30 percent of the matenal shall be large size (24-inch box size trees, and/or 10~allon size shrubs) Pnor to bwlding permit issuance, a detailed landscape and imgation shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval Retaining wall height shall not exceed 4 feet upslope from the structure and adjacent to dnveways. The retaining wall adjacent to the north property line shall be revised to meet this regwrement by reduang the wall height or adtusting the finished grade at the low side. Enoineerina Division: 1. Rear yard contours to have 2 percent minimum slope from the building pad toward the flow line (flow line shall be 10 feet minimum from pad). 2. The flow Ime in front of the garage shall not be higher than the garage pad. 3 Install street trees per tree list attached. 4 Street trees on new streets are to be selected from the City's approved street tree list, based upon available planting area (typically between back-of-curb and the sidewalk). Established streets should already have designated tree species. Contact Laura Bonaccorsi at (909) 477-2740, ext 4023, for information 5. Street trees are to be shown on street or other public improvement plans signed by the City Engineer, and constructed per the same. 6. Street trees shown on Planning Division submittals are conceptual only. 7 Intenor streets will be required to select Deciduous trees for east-west streets and Evergreen trees for north-south streets from the Citys approved street tree list. Wind-prone areas maybe requred to utilize a more Decduous palette 8. Indicated spaangs and sizes are requirements for Cdy-maintained trees only Where the tree concept goes beyond areas of influence near public improvements and/or any City maintenance easement, spacings and sizes will be per the on-site plans approved by the Planning Division. On-site and off-site plans shall be coordinated. 9. Plans shall reflect the legend and notes indicated below. STREET BOTANICAL NAME COMMON MIN SPACING SIZE QTY NAME GROW SPACE Predera Brachychiton Populneus (Existing Bottle tree 5 feet 25 feet 15- 1 Court Sweet Gums not to be repeated) O.C. gallon Do not use the tree that is on the current Site Plan #922 Exhibit "F-1" ~ • • • . JIM GRAY DR 00-81 -JAMES GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO . March 12, 2001 Page 3 "Where there is inadequate room in front of the walk or within right-of-way, show trees a 4-foot minimum behind sidewalk (an area of influence) on the plans. 10 All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 11. Pnor to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic sods report shall be furnished to the City Inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City Inspector. 12. Alls trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineenng Division. 13. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. FIRE SAFETY DIVISION: 1 The proposed project is located within a designated high fire hazard area and is subject to special urban/wildland interface hazard mitigation requirements. This includes compliance with construction standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety (FR) Overlay District regulations. Visit www.co san-Bernardino ca us/landuseservices/DevCode/805- an Adobe copy The regulations are in The following requirements shall be included as notes on the corrected plans under the title "Fuel ModifirationNegetation Management Plan Notes." 2. All native vegetation located within 30 feet of the structure shall be removed and maintained as necessary. Exception: single specimens not more than 18 inches in height and 6 feet from structures, which are imgated and maintained. Soil erosion and sediment control measures shall be taken. 3 An imgated zone shall be maintained around structures fora minimum of 30 feet. All plants shall befire-resistant and xeriscape type. Provide "common" names on plant palette. Maintain as necessary (Visit www.orefire ucfol.ucoo.edu/vegetati.htm for fire-resistant plant and defensible space landscaping information.) 4 Native grasses and weeds shall be removed or mowed/cut to a height of 4 inches. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be taken. Maintain as necessary 5 All tree limbs within 6 feet off the ground shall be pruned and disposed of properly. All litter and leaves will be removed and disposed of properly. Maintain as necessary Exhibit "F-2" ~~,~ JIM GRAY DR 00-81 -JAMES GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO. March 12, 2001 Page 4 Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work pnor to issuance of budding permits. This decision shall be final following aten-day appeal penod beginning with the date of this letter Appeals must be filed in writing with the Planning Commission Secretary, stating the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $62 appeal fee. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Donald Granger at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m to 6:00 p.m. Sincerely, BB•DG1ma Attachment. Standard Conditions Environmental Documents cc: Karen Mosley, Public Svc. Tech. I Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer .NT ~- Exhibit "F-3" ~~~ ~~ r1 U r-~ City Planner APPELLANT'S PROPERTY Exhibit "G" EXISTING 4 FOOT RETAINING WALL ALONG SOUTHEAST PROPERTY LINE U~\S fi APPLICANT'S PROPERTY RESOLUTION NO. 02-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRCDR00-81 TO INCLUDE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRING FENCING ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROPERTY LINE, FORA 2,455 SQUARE FOOT HOME ON 29-ACRE OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 8721 PREDERA COURT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 207-631-19 A. Recitals 1. On December 5, 2000, Mr. Jim Gray, general contractor for the applicant, Mr. Jarod Crow, submitted an application for a Hillside Design Review 2 On March 12, 2001, the City Planner approved Development Review DRCDR00-81vnth conditions. 3. On November 7, 2001, the City Planner and the neighbor, Mr Charles Buquet, conducted a meeting and the City Planner derned the appellant's request to add a condition requmng side yard fencing along the southeasterly property Ime to the previously approved application. The decision of the City Planner was appealed m a timely manner to this Commission . on November 14, 2001 4 On the December 12, 2001, and continued to January 9, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the appeal and concluded said meeting on that date. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rectals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial eHdence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on December 12, 2001, and January 9, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission herebyspeafically finds as follows• a The application applies to property located at 8721 Predera Court with a street frontage of approximately 51 feet and lot depth of approximately 170 feet and is presently improved vwth a two-story single-family home under construction; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and is zoned Low Residential, • the property to the south is developed with a single-family home and is zoned Low Residential, the property to the east is vacant and is zoned Low-Residential and the property to the west is vacant and is zoned Low Residential; and U\~P PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-14 DRCDR00-81 -JAROD CROW January 9, 2002 • Page 2 c There is an elevation difference between the appellant's property, located at 8725 Predera Court, and the applicant's property, located at 8721 Predera Court, of approximately 11 feet, and d The Development Code states that protects should be compatible and sensitive to the immediate environment, and side yard fencing provides a physical safety barrier between residential properties that have a substantial difference in elevation; e The installation of side yard fenang between residential properties provides protection against nuisance activity and mitigates the impacts of nuisance activity that may occur between properties, thereby meeting the obtectives of the Development Code 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission herebyfinds and conGudes as follows a. The proposed modification to DRCDR00-81 is consistent Hnth the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed modification to DRCDR00-81 is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located; and • c. The proposed modification to DRCDR00-81 is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d. The proposed modification to DRCDR00-81, togetherwnth the conditions applipble thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally injurious to properties or impro~,ements in the sanity 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the appeal, and modifies the approval for Development Review DRCDR00-81 to add the folloHnng conditions Planning Division 1) A fence shall be installed along the southeasterly property line. The fenang shall be constructed in accordance w7th standard fence detail on file Huth the Planning Division. 2) The fenang shall be constructed as follows: A 6-foot wood fence shall be constructed adtacent to the existing 4-foot retaining wall that is offset 1-foot from the southeasteriy property line of 8721 Predera Court. The 6-foot fence shall begin at the intersection of the southeriy and westeriy property lines of 8721 Predera Court, then continue easterly for a distance of 130 feet. At 130 feet beyond the intersection of the southerly and easterly property lines, the fence shall transition • into a height of 4 feet, then continue easterly for a distance of 25 feet, terminating perpendicular to the existing wrought iron fencing at 8725 Predera Court All fens: heights shall be measured from the finished grade at 8721 Predera Court to top offence. ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-14 DRCDR00-81 -JAROD CROW January 9, 2002 Page 3 3) Within 10 days from the approval date of this resolution, the applicant shall submit a fencing plan to the City Plannerfor review and approval. 4) The fencing shall be installed within 30 days of the approval date ofthis resolution 5) The added condition of approval regwnng the installation of fencng along the southeasterly property line shall not waive compliance with any section of the Citys Development Code. 6) Approval of this appeal shall not waive compliance wrath all other pnor conditions of approval for Development Rewew DRCDR00-81, as indicated in the City Planner's approval letter dated March 12, 2001 7) The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Bwlding and Safety Division. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption ofthis Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2002. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretaryof the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dulyand regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 2002, bythe following vote-to-~nnt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. U \[~