Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/01/23 - Agenda Packet • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~- - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY JANUARY 23, 2002 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Macias Coin Mannenno _ Com Stewart _ Com Tolstoy II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 9, 2002 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controvers~al They will be acted on by the Commission at one time wdhout d~scuss~on If anyone has concern over any item, d should be removed for discussion A VACATION V-183 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to vacate excess street nght-of-way at the southwest side of the knuckle intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street - APN 209-041-47. Related Fde Development Review 00-61 B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC. - A proposed 14,873 square foot office structure to support a weekly auto auction on 33 5 acres, and 9 4 acres of additional storage area on the adjacent Southern California Edison (SCE) parcel, for a total of 42 9 acres m the Heavy Industnal Distnct (Subarea 15), located at 12167 Arrow Route - APN. 229-121-15 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for three previously approved tentative tract maps consisting of 113 single- family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acres) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located on the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street and approximately 300 feet north of the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street APN 225-101-44 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14523-1, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14494, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15902 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings m which concerned ~nd~v~duals may voice their opm~on of the related project. Please wart to 6e recognized by the Cha~nnan and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be l~mrted to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign in aRerspeakmg D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 26 7 acres of land into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from January 9, 2002) E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land in the Medwm Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN. 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 Staff has prepared a Negatroe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from January 9, 2002) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC. - A public hearing to consider certifying the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approving the Statement of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations for the proposed protect known as Victoria Gardens, a mixed use development consisting of • n lJ Page 2 • • approximately 2 45 million square feet of retail, office, and awc uses, as well as up to 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land The protect site is within the City boundary and the Victoria Community Plan and is generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 (Continued from January 9, 2002) G ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC - A request to establish a Development Agreement and the detailed review of a master plan for a protect known as Victoria Gardens, amixed-use development consisting of approximately 2 45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses, as well as 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land The protect site is within the City boundary and the Victoria Community Plan, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 Related files Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01 and Tentative Parcel Map 15716 (Continued from January 9, 2002) H ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan by changing the land use designation from Regional Center to Mixed Use and modifying various text sections and graphics in the Community Plan to accommodate the proposed protect known as Victoria Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 Related files: Development Agreement 01-02 and Tentative Parcel Map 15716 (Continued from January 9, 2002) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC - A request to subdivide approximately 147acres of land into 97 parcels and 39 lettered lots (private and public streets) to accommodate the proposed protect known as Victoria Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west - APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, and 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36. Related files. Development Agreement 01-02 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01. (Continued from January 9, 2002) Page 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00778 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A request to construct a temporary modular recreation building of 360 square feet in the Mountain View Apartments (Tract 12365) in The Medium-High Residential Distnct (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway -APN 1077-651-07 K ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION - A request to construct a new 3,946 square foot service station with convenience market, drive-thru carwash, and pump island on 1 39 acre of land in the Office Park District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive -APN 1077-421-38 Related file Preliminary Review DRC2001-00247 Staff has prepared a Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VI. NEW BUSINESS PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2002-00014 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A courtesy review of General Plan consistency of the proposed site acgwsition of approximately 18 2 acres of land for an elementary school in the Estate Residential District (up to 1 dwelling unit per acre), located on the north side of Banyan Street, west of East Avenue -APN' 225-122-39, 40, 85, and 86 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This ~s the hme and place for the general public to address the comm~ss~on Items to he discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Comm~ss~on has adopted Admin~strahve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If dems go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the L^.OmmISSIOn 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning COmmISSlon Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certdy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 17, 2002, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~v~c Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga • C~ Page 4 Vicinity Map Planning Commission January 23, 2002 ~ ~- '~` ' Sphers•of lri fluence ;:`' ;. '•' ~; ;: ;: C - Hillside ;, L - Wilson ~ ~ Banyan ,~ ~ ~ 19th ~ - ~ t~ _ • J ~ Baseline K ~ r Fs G, ~ H,I Fo thill o i A rrow ® 6 th w ~° A °~ c 4th ~ _v ~ c c j Y ~ _ ~ B D, E a City of Rancho Cucamonga • * CITY HALL N r~ L_J RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: January 23, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civd Engineer BY: Mark N Brawthen, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION V-183 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to vacate excess street nght-of--way at the southwest side of the knuckle intersection of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street-APN: 209-041-47. Related Ftle: DR 00-61. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 9, 2000, the Planning Commission approved Development Review No 00- 61, arequest for 49 senior apartments, on 1.31 acres of land in the High Residential Distract with a Senior Housing Overlay Distract, located at the southwest comer of Malvern Avenue and Salina Street. One of the conditions of DR 00-61 is to vacate excess nght-of-way along portions of the Malvern Avenue and Salina Street frontages within the knuckle type intersection of the two streets. The vacated excess nght-of-way will be incorporated into the protect and maintained by the property owner. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that the vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, ~Qi~'~ Dan Jame Senior Crod Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" -Vacation Exhibit ITEM A City of Rancho Cucamonga N ~~ EXHIBIT "~" • Vicinity Map EJ~TT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN MALVERN AVENUE AND SALINA STREET TO BE VACATED That pomon of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Townshrp 1 South, Range 7 West, m the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemazdmo, State of Calrfomra as shown on the map of Cucamonga Lands recorded rn Book 4, Page 9 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County descnbed as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the westerly line of Tract No 5347 as per map recorded m Book 66, Pages 11 and 12 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of sard County with the southerly hne of Salina Street, 60 00 feet wide, thence along card southerly hne of Salina Street South 89°42'11" West 133 83 feet to the begrnnrng of a tangent curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 69 feet, said curve also being tangent to the westerly line of Malvern Avenue, 66 00 feet wide, as conveyed to the County of San Benuudrno by deed recorded May 3, 1960, m Book 5127, Page 402 of Officral Records of Bard County, Bard beguuung of tangent curve rs the True Point of Beginning for this descnption; thence continuing along said southerly line of Salina Street South 89°42'11" West 69 20 feet to the mtersecrion with the westerly line of sard Malvern Avenue, thence along said westerly line of Malvern Avenue North 00°07'52" West 69.20 feet to the end of the above-menrioned curve having a radius of 69 feet; thence southerly, southeasterly and easterly along sazd curve through a central angle of 90°09'57", an azc length of 108 58 feet to the True Point of Beginning Contarmng 1,029 squaze feet (0 024 acres) The above descnbed real property is shown on exhrbit "B" attached herewith and by this reference made a part here of Prepared under my supernsion. A PLS 3173 ~3 LOREN C. PHILLIPS LS 3173 ,,f LEGAL DESCRIPTION doc-01/07/02-26v EXHIBIT "B" I'' LOREN C. PHfIIR'S ~c LS 3113 , EXP(y 3D,G~ J' , T~TFOF CAU% .r^/ YI N 4 t 29.84' 33' _ M O Q Z "-50' R DELTAe90'09'S7' ~ j TAN=69.20' O SAUNA cO. STREET ~ ` N896 2?~t "E \ N n b TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING 0 z t~ LOREN C. PHILLIPS, P.L S. 3173 R S89'42'S9"E LEGEND ® DENOTES VACATION OF R-O-W BY CITY TO OWNER. - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE EXHIBR MAP FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION /"8aZ O V89'42'11 "E Mp 133 SOUTHRLY LINEN OF I ao SAUNA STREET M ~ N POINT OF BEGINNING '--' i / WESTERLY LINE ~ ~ _ TR. N0. 5347 I ~ 19' SIDEWALK - EASEMENT I M DATE I o b I l z 332.91 ' LOREN PHIWPS do ASSOCIATES 22632 GOLDEN SPRINGS DR. SUITE 230 DIAMOND BAR, CA. 91765 ~ (909) 396-9636 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: January 23, 2002 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY. Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC - A proposed 14,873 square foot office structure to support a weekly auto auction on 33.5 acres, and 9 4 acres of additional storage area on the adjacent Southern California Edison (SCE) parcel, for a total of 42 9 acres in the Heavy Industnal Distnct (Subarea 15), located at 12167 Arrow Route - APN. 229-121-15 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -General Industnal (Subarea 8)/Warehouse Distnbution Facility South -General Indusfial (Subarea 15)/Metrolmk Route, Vacant Land East - Heary Industnal (Subarea 15)/Alcohol Distillery, Vacant Land West -Heavy Industnal (Subarea 15)/SCE Transmission Line Comdor and Interstate 15, Vacant Land B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Heavy Industnal North -General Industnal South -General Industnal East -Flood Control/Utility Comdor West -Heavy Industnal C Site Charactenstics This site was once the home of AMPAC, a concrete pipe manufacturer Remnants of the operation remain, including penmeter landscaping, structures, and numerous concrete pads The smaller of the existing buildings will be demolished, and the applicant proposes to clean up and retain the largest existing building The existing trees on the penmeter of the site will be retained, including the landscaping along Arrow Route There Is no native vegetation remaining on the site The surrounding property to the west and south is vacant, industnally zoned property The property to the east is developed as the an alcohol conversion plant, the property north of Arrow Route has been developed with Industnal buildings intended for manufactunng, warehouse, and/or distnbution The Metrolmk rail line forms the south boundary of the site, the I-15 freeway forms the west boundary of the protect. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC January 23, 2002 Page 2 The applicant intends to conclude a lease with Southern California Edison, in a desire to use the SCE comdor as additional automobile storage space associated with this project The SCE comdorcontains a high-voltage transmission line The use of the SCE property is included in the proposed pro/ect D Parking Calculations Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Auto Storage/Auction 14,873 N/A N/A 236 Office Building employee/visitor 18 Yuck stalls ANALYSIS. A General: This is the site of the "Origen Rail Center" (Development Review 99-70) approved at this location in February 2000. Since that approval, the City Traffic Engineer has determined that this location is the site of the prefer-ed new on/off ramp to the I-15 Freeway, consuming much of the site frontage and making the previous approval impossible to develop. Consistent Huth the goals of the 2001 General Plan, COPART, Inc. has proposed this location for a facility that is designed for storage, processing, and wholesale distnbution of automobiles. The vehicles are sold under contract with auto insurance companies COPART will conduct weekly auto auctions, accessible only to wholesale customers The General Plan encourages car sales as a land use along the I-15 Freeway comdor. The front portion of the site, with access from Arrow Route, will be paved and landscaped along Arrow Route and throughout the front parking lot. The auto storage area will have secured access to employees only Auto storage will occur on 33 5 acres of pnvate property, as well as 9 4 acres of the adjacent SCE comdor The applicant is in the process of secunng a lease with SCE for the long-term use of the property The entire site area is reflected on the Site Plan The landscaping along Arrow Route will be preserved and enhanced along the streetscape, and other existing trees along the east and west boundanes will be preserved in place. B Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the pro/ect on two occasions, December 4, 2001 (McNeil, Stewart, Fong) and December 18, 2001 (Stewart, Fong) The Committee focused on architectural detailing of the building elevations, site landscaping, and the proposed fencing and wall matenal BUILDING ELEVATIONS• The applicant has proposed a masonry block structure Through committee review and discussion, the building has been modified to incorporate split-face block and fluted block patterns Block columns, orwing-walls, have been incorporated at the entry and at all building comers LANDSCAPING The site includes 10 percent landscaping within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route and 5 percent landscaping in the rear of the lot. The landscaping in the front portion of the site (within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route) includes landscaping throughout the parking lot and along the building frontage, and along the parkway setback area The landscaping in the rear of the lot is focused on • ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC January 23, 2002 Page 3 providing screening of the site from the freeway and from the Metrolink route. Based on suggestions from the Committee, the landscaping in the rear has been split between two north/south rows of landscaping that will provide a tiered screening from the freeway view WALLS/FENCING The applicant had onginally proposed the use of a metal fence around the penmeter of the site Based on Committee discussion, the project will provide asplit-face block wall along the rail line boundary and around the northwesterly comer adtacent to the freeway on/off ramp, wrought-iron fenang wdl be used along the on/off ramp through the front parkng lot, and the metal fence will be used along the east and west boundary lines and on the intenor to separate the front parking area form the vehicle storage area With this design, the block wall is used in areas of greatest public exposure to the site C Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on December 5, 2001 All standard and special conditions have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Environmental Assessment• The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Studyand staff has completed Part II, the Environmental Checklist Form. The attached Resolution of Approval contains mitigation for Water Resources (related to the preparation of a Storrs Water Pollution Prevention Plan and the use of Best Management Practices dunng grading and construction), Air Quality (mitigation measures for dust prevention dunng grading and construction), Biological Resources (for the preservation of existing • trees), and Hazards (to ensure that all appropnate pennits for the aboveground fuel storage tanks are obtained and that appropriate Business Plans are in place related to the use and storage of fuel on- site) CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2001-00675, subject to all Conditions of Approval Respecttull i submitted, Brad er City Planner BB DM ma Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Resolution - Location Map - Site Plan - Landscape Plan - Bwlding Elevations - Grading Plan - Design Review Committee Action Comments for December 4, 2001 - Design Review Committee Action Comments for December 18, 2001 - Initial Study Parts I and II of Approval with Conditions for Development Review DRC2001-00675 B3 n -.J W !//C/lV/TY M.4P N.T.S I"1 U ~~ ~If~i~rr-~f ~a a :^~ ~ \\ Y (~w YY I(\ 6 ~V~\-+ E '`\' i l T y Y e °p g5g 3 tea. °" ~ f~ v t,Y 3 l ~l eep p .` ~ ~~~ ~ ~ b 0a ~5 ~s o ~! a ~~~ ~ a ~~ o ~ 6~ 3 ~~~ ~~ ~~ off/,~/T~ ~l ~ ~5 ~~ cry ~~ ~~~ ~ ~;_ ~~s ? ~... R.. ~~ ~ i :5 p 5 !~ 4 S b J/~ p=~ ppr ~y' ! ~: ppip~~~ Q giy a e I q l ~ AFB ~ C - q ~ B8 a 4Bsge g P$~ q y 99 Y I 31 I ~ ~ _ ~ ,1 YY: kpE VV ~~8 i:' ~'\ ~i d ' ~ t 65 ~ ~ ~ e ' ~ tl ~ i' $@ 5 a: \ , a €y ~~ r Y a 5 Wy ff 3 3I PY ~~ ~ ~ ~ e55O, o !~~ Q \\ ~ s ~ ~ c.a 33a Ua g g ~ ~, ~~. Z z~~. ~ ~ ~', Q ~ - f~ ~ U ~ , ~y ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~~~ Y Y ~~ ~s y~ C r -~ ~ S- F d Fs+ ~ ~: 3 i 5 ~ [ i i t i, .; x; e 3 ~° sp F t ; ~ t I s ~3 - P >, ~ s s F nni~, nono a i £ g 3 _ 3 / ? e ~, e. ~; S., k1 =3'b x S G ~ ° _ ~_ _ ~ ~ _~t j _ i ) I R -° [ le t Y '~ ` Y E T g P a ~6_ Y~ _ Y o F ~ ~ IOC ~ ~ ! c3 :E ~ L` ~/ _ ` F ":3 3 ,_ i 2 8 ka ~ <~ + ~ < s ~ F 3 I~ a .e ~`- 3t • e[ i f ~g FP ;S ~t E ~I - ~ fg;'i: iS s~ ya' Fs ~ Er \ ~ k{~ ~$~ ~/$ ° Fg~ Yi '' J ~ a / ¢o I; . o o ®c i ~ ~ t3 f~ g~ ~ \ b Z Q f g ~ W~ [f ~S is V ~ ~ s_ w ~ a z i [ ~ 4E ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ,g - k I ~ - x ;~ t a ~ Va ~ ~ ~$~ g 3 ~ ~t - + ~ ~ I .~s , I e y ~Uwd e < s ~ <o~Q e ~ 3 g a guLLd it I 6~-'a// i ~oo~ i ~ !kE ~ ~ t i Y/rJ/ a e^'-a ~~ ~4~ f ;: aj1 Igl$ p ~ '~ a}E ~ ' ~ ¢[ I $I$ ' ~ 4.8 ~ 5 Se 6t ~' 1 4 ~ 5ses I F ~ `~ y- OCG~ ^- ~ n~ ~ N ` e `f f r ~ C i I . € 1 ~a- 8( ~ k Ic ~( f aas P F S s ~~i.a "< t s~ C 3E i _ Sgg; f 9fr / ~~ X'~p& e_~ P €F _p~/p/~p'~j~j~:~ 7 p~_ ~lo I -f l/ [ /~~ $L/ ~z$ wi..w ~.~~ Ln~.n L n.m our ~.x ~.,. ~ ~..~~ ~ u~ ~~..~ EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 7",.,Ee ... ~~ NORTH COPART, INC EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA WARE MALCOMB .~exsne. ....ww,..sa via v wvaann ~. "s e F F i Y t 1 / 1 ~_J Y ~ ~' S g ~ r f I Y'~ E 6 1 Y eg E ~Q x g ~'E FF~~ Y Y~ Y ~~~ f 8 1Y SY Y ~ = .Y ~ 8 i i~E !Y e. ! ~~ 00 0 00 V ! 13iMS378 1 ie11 $ ,,,, i _-. _~~ _ __ - q ~ i ~ q -_ ~~~ I ~,. I I ~' I ti I ~ o "'. ,Y W I ». ... ... ~ o ~ -.. ~ ... I t I~ \I ... • ... ,. Yx I I .I I I ~. it I I ~ II I .i. ",. ~ _ a w, I I I ~ • v I I I ~ Nar ` I "" I I I t~ .. - _-__ --~ __ - 1~~y i I I =~ I~ I / i I li w I / - I 1 L. "" .... .. I ~ ~ _ I I I ~'I I 1 ~ + I \\W i i ~ ll~~ ~ II _ „9 I \\\\ ~ I ~ I~ \~~ `\ } 1~ 1 I ~. I i w I i II r I / i / I I .. CO y ~ YF ~ ~~9 - -- _ - - ~ _ ?.e DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS r 7:30 p m. Debra Meier December 4, 2001 ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENTREVIEW(DRC2001-00675)-COPART, INC. - A proposed 14,873 square foot office structure to support a weekly auto auction on 39.2 acres located at 12167 Arrow Route in the Heavy Industnal Distnct (Subarea 15) -APN. 229- 121-15 Desion Parameters• This is the site of the formerAMPAC concrete pipe manufacturing facility, and was also the location of the "Ongin Rail Center" proposed by Master Development Corporation, which was approved by the Planning Commission in February 2000 (Development Review 99-70). Since the approval of Development Review 99-70, the City Traffic Engineer has evaluated vanous locations for anew on/off ramp to the I-15 freeway The preferred location for the new access ramps is at Arrow Route. As a result of discussions with the developer, the City Traffic Engineer has indicated a desire to purchase a portion of this site for construction of the proposed freeway access ramps, this will cause the development of the Ongin Rail Center to be infeasible Therefore, Master Development Corporation has been marketing the property for other uses. Also, the recently adopted General Plan Update policies encourage automotive sales uses along the I-15 Comdor. COPART, Inc., has submitted an application for a facility designed for storage, processing, and wholesale distnbution of automobiles. The vehicles are sold under contract with car insurance companies. The companywdl conduct weekly auctions, accessible to automobile wholesalers only. The faality will include a 14,860 square foot office building, 236 parking spaces for employees and wholesale customers, and 18 parking spaces for trucks (used to trailer vehicles that are either delivered or purchased from the faality). The front portion of the site is accessible from Arrow Route; the parking lot is landscaped and paved. The existing landscaping along Arrow Route will be preserved and enhanced wherever necessary. Behind the office building the site will be cleared of old concrete slabs and rubble and covered with decomposed granite, this is the auto storage area. However, the applicant indicates that the largest existing structure will be cleaned up; all extraneous egwpment removed, and Hall remain. COPART, Inc., is also in the process of finalmng a lease agreement with Southern California Edison for use of the adjacent Edison Comdor for additional auto storage space Access to the Edison parcel will be provided from the rear storage yard area. The penmeter of the site will be fenced, including a solid masonry wall along the south boundary, and a solid metal fence along the side lot lines. The applicant has proposed a 22-foot wide landscape planter along the west and south property lines. This will provide screening of stored vehicles from the Metrolink along the south, and from the freeway to the west. Because the freeway is elevated above the site, the landscaping along the west property line will provide a greater buffer than along the west boundary of the Edison parcel Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. BUILDING ELEVATIONS The applicant has proposed a masonry block structure; the building vanes in height from 18 feet over the front office, to 24 feet in the rear portion The structure is 14,860 square feet in area (160 feet by 80 feet) Although the structure is small in companson to the overall project size it will have freeway visibility, therefore, sufficient details on all sides of the structure are important. The structure incorporates two masonry block units, the pnmary building plane is spilt face block, with amid-level and upper edge band of smooth face block, which is painted blue A tubular steel trellis accents the front entry and the employee eating area at the rear of the budding The front entry should be further accentuated by expanding the use of either vision and/or spandrel glass. ~~ ~~-//.8/~~ / ~ la DRC COMMENTS " DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC. December 4, 2001 • Page 2 LANDSCAPING• Staff recommends that the planter depth around the building be increased to 10 feet Also, planters should be provided at the ends of truck stalls in public parking areas (rather than lust diagonal painted stnping) There a number of existing trees both along the Arrow Route frontage, as well as along the boundary between COPART, Inc ,and the adjacent distillery. It is the applicants intent to preserve in-place as many existing trees as possible. The landscape planter along the east boundary has been expanded in width in order to accommodate the existing trees; and the landscaping plan along the street frontage is designed to preserve existing trees and enhance the existing landscaping. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval with revisions as noted above Design Review Committee Action: Members Present• Lany McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Debra Meier Commissioner McNeil asked the applicant, represented by Mr. Paul Shyer of COPART, Inc. to descnbe the business activities and operation of the proposed facility. Mr. Shyer indicated that COPART, Inc. has 89 faalities nationwide; they contract with all major insurance tamers in . California for the sale of vehicles that the~insurance company has taken possession of for various reasons. Many of the vehicles have sustained some degree of damage. COPART processes the title work for the insurance company, and conducts weekly wholesale auctions. The v~-~~c'~s are on-site an average of 60 days, the gwcker they are fumed overthe more efficient for their ~::~iress. The auction typically features the sale of approximately 300 vehices per week, with approximately 200 individuals attending the auction. Buyers range from body shops, and dealers, to salvage companies. All buyers must have the appropriate wholesale or salvage auto licenses to attend the auction Fencing and Screenin~c . The Committee discussed at length the use of the metal fencing and the need for screening the use with decorative material. The Committee requested the following information be provided by the applicant: Wind rating, gauge of the steel, and investigate alternative finishes, such as a sandblasted surfacing. The Committee also recommended the following changes: A wrought-iron fence be used along the freeway ramp, rather than the metal fence. b. The block wall that is sued along the southern boundary be constructed of split-face block to be consistent with the bwlding matenal. c The extenor gate be constructed of wrought iron, the intenor gates shall be solid view obstructing matenal Building Elevation. The Committee requested that the budding elevations be enhanced, with . additional attention to budding detailing, including the bulding entry The Committee suggested that the applicants look at the two split-face block office buildings that are located on the west side of the freeway, south of the site, for ideas pertaining to the use of block and glass, that result is a simple yet attractive structure ~2 ~ ~ 1 DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC. December 4, 2001 Page 3 Landscaomo: The Committee concurred with the staff recommendation regarding landscaping on the site Landscape planters shall be provided m the public parking area at the ends of the truck parking bays (The applicant indicated that this would work best if they widened the end spaces to provide extra maneuvenng room for the truck), and the landscaping around the penmeter of the building shall be 10 feet minimum in front of the screen wall, and trees shall be provided at the employee eating area in the rear of the bulding Action• The Committee agreed that the revisions to the project should be returned for Committee review and approval. T ~ ~ ~02 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Debra Meier December 18, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00675-COPART, INC - A proposed 14,873 square foot office structure to support a weekly auto auction on 39 2 acre, located at 12167 Arrow Route in the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15) - APN 29-121-15 Background The Committee reviewed this protectat its meeting on December4, 2001 and directed the applicant to make revisions to the protect that focused on building design details, screening, and fencing The applicant will submit revised plans to the Committee for review and discussion Action The Committee agreed that the revisions to the protect should be returned for Committee review and approval Design Review Committee Action: Members Present McNeil, Stewart, Fong Staff Planner Debra Meier Commissioner McNeil asked the applicant, represented by Mr Paul Shyer of COPART, Inc to describe the business activities and operation of the proposed faality Mr Shyer indicated that COPART has 89 facilities nationwide, they contract with all mayor insurance tamers in California for the sale of vehicles that the insurance company has taken possession of forvanous reasons Many of the vehicles have sustained some degree of damage COPART processes the title work for the insurance company, and conducts weekly wholesale auctions The vehicles are on-site an average of 60 days, the quicker they are turned over the more efficient for their business The auction typical features the sale of approximately 300 vehicles per week, with approximately 200 individuals attending the auction Buyers range from body shops, and dealers, to salvage companies All buyers must have the appropriate wholesale or salvage auto licenses to attend the auction Fencing and Screemno The Committee discussed at length the appropriate use of the metal fencing The Committee requested the following information be provided by the applicant Wind rating, and gauge of the steel In addition, the Committee wanted the applicant to investigate alternative finishes, such as a sandblasted surfacing The Committee requested that awrought-iron fence be used along the freeway ramp, rather than the metal fence The Committee requested that the block wall along the southern boundary be constructed of split- face block to be consistent with the budding material The Committee requested that the exterior gate be constructed of wrought iron, the interior gates shall be solid view obstructing material Bwlding Elevation The Committee requested that the bwlding elevations be enhanced, with additional attention to bwlding detailing, including the budding entry The Committee suggested that the applicants look at the two split-face block office bwldings that are located on the west side of the freeway, south of the site, for ideas pertaining to the use of block and glass, that result in a simple yet attractive structure ~ 13 DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC December 18, 2001 Page 2 Landscaoing The Committee concurred with the staff recommendation regarding landscaping on the site Landscape planters shall be provided in the public parking area at the ends of the truck parking bays (The applicant indicated that this would work best if they widened the end spaces to provide extra maneuvenng room for the truck), and the landscaping around the perimeter of the building shall be 10 feet minimum in front of the screen wall, and trees shall be provided at the employee eating area in the rear of the bwlding Design Review Committee Action Members Present Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Debra Meier The applicant presented revised plans to the Committee for review, including 1 Revise building elevations which incorporate additional use of fluted and textures block, increased use of glass at the entry, and the introduction of protruding columns at key location on the bwlding The Committee made the following recommendabons to modify the elevations The protruding wing walls used at the entry shall extend 6-feet beyond the enter doors, and the height of the wing wall shall be reduced, as shown in the rear elevation Revised Site Ptan portraying the planters at the ends of the truck stall as previously requested, the landscaping in the rear of the parcel as been divided in to two parallel strips, running north and south, to provide layers of visually buffering from the freeway view The Committee concurred with the revisions as proposed by the applicant The applicant provided a sample of the proposed perimeter metal wall, and a textured surface that can be used if desired The Committee reviewed the locations of block versus metal wall location on the site plan, and requested that the block wall be used at the northwesterly corner of the site near the freeway off/on- ramp The Committee requested that the finish used on the metal fence match the color and texture of the split face block used on the bwlding and block wall to the extent possible With the revisions noted, the Committee recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and approval ~~~ ~ G~ ,r CM of Rancho Cucamonga Plennmp Orvrswn (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the responslbll~ty oI the applicant to ensure that the appl~cabon Is complete at the time o/ submittal, Clty steH wdl not be available to perform work required to prowde missmg mformahon Application Number for the project to which this form ~ / pertains DRC2001-00470 /~t%/wil~[~~ lest die Inc. Name&Addressofpro~ect Echo Rock Ventures, 13620 Lincoln Way, Suite 380 owner(s) Auburn, CA 95603-3236 Name&Addresso/developerorpro~ect _ sponsor San Jose, CA 95126 ContactPerson8 Joe Carroll PH: (408) 244-9280 Add2ss • ~~ Joe Carroll Resource One 2176 The Alameda I \PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 1 Name & Address of person prepanng this /orm (it dd/erent from above) Number '1) Provide a full scale (8-12 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and md~cate the site boundanes 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative wews into the ste /rom the north, south, east and west wews into and /rom the site from the pnmary access points which serve the site, and representative wews of s~gmficant features from the site Include a map showing Iocat~on o/each photograph 3) Pro~ectLocation(descnbe) Southeast quadrant intersection of Arrow Route Highway and 15 Freeway • 4) Assessores Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet A necessary) 229-121-15 •5)GrossSdeArea(adsgft) 39.2 acres (1,708,282 s.f.) ~6) Net Sde Area (total site srze minus area o/public streets 8 proposed dedications) 3 3 . 6 acres (1, 4 6 3 , 413 ) 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet it necessary N/A /~~ ~1 ~ 11PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTERIINITSTDI WPD 3/00 Paor ~ lnformat~on md~cated by astensk (') ~s not regwrnd ofnon-construction CUPas unless othenv~se requested by sta/t -~ 8J Include a descnption o/ a// permits which will be necessary /rom the City o/ Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully implement the project Negative Declaration, Grading Permit, Building Permits 9JDescnbe the physical setting olthe site as rt exists be/ore the protect including information on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs of significant featums descnbed In addition, site all sources of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic stud~esJ The site is a flat graded site which gently slopes to the south- facility with exist been utilized as a precast concrete plant 20 year old concrete tilt-up batch plant 30,000 s . and small se to twd-story office building or lu uu0 s.f. and balance of site is coin acted casting area. The entrance is full landsca ed and ated. The soil is coin acted~~ alluvium sand. There are no plants, animals, or mature trees (exce t for entrance landsca in which exists on the site). There are no studies in existance regarding geological, hydrological, biotec, archeolo ical, or traffic studies. IOJDescnbe the known cultural and/or histoncalaspacts ollhe sde Site all sources ofinformation (books, published reports and oral history) Not Known J h~3 ~ ~ ~ I 1PLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTERIINITSTDI WPD 3/00 P80P 'i 11)Descnbe any Horse sources an• rr levels that now affect the site (airoratt, road. noise, etc) and how they wdl affect proposed uses Existing roadway noise from the 15 Freeway is moderate. 12)Descnbe the proposed pm/ect m detail This should pmwde an adequate descnption o/the site m terms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed protect Indicate it there are proposed phases /or development, the extent o/ development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach add~t~onal sheet(s) i/necessary The proposed project will outfit the site for the stora e g processing and wholesale distribution of automobiles. The entire site will have an 8ft high solid fence around it's circumference. One office __ building shall exist for general administrative and processing needs. The ro ect will be develo ed as a sin le hase with antici ated coin letion b mid ear 2002. 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects lnd~cate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-/amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The surroundin ro ert to the north, west, and south is vacant industrial zoned ro ert The ro ert to the east is develo ed as an alcohol conversion lant. The BASF railroad line abuts the south ro ert line and the Edison Com an hi h volta a trans- mission line abuts the west ro ert line. 14)Will the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ect? yy ~i8 11PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMSICOUNTERIINITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 4 . 15 Indicate the • 9- 9 • type of short-term and Ion teem nose to be enerated, ~ncludmg source and amount How will these noise levels affect ad/acent properties and on-site uses What methods o/sound proofing are proposed wi '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o(mature orscenrc trees ficant noise levels which 17) Indicate any bodes of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams Da Creek Flood Control Channel Wlll nOt ac to si tie • 18Jlndreateexpectedemounto/water usage (SeeAttechmentAforusageestimates) For furtherclanfication,pleasecontact the Cucamonga County WaterOrstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (ga4day) N/A Peak use (gaUDay) N/A b Commero~aUlnd (gal/day/ac) _ 1, 5 0 0 Peak use (gaUmm/ac) z. 5 19)lndicate proposed method o/sewage disposal Septic Tank X Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generet~on (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For further clanficahon, p/ease contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987- 2591 a Residential (gal/dayJ b CommeroraUlnd (gaUday/ec) 2,00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS• 20J Number of residential unds Detached (md~cate range of parcel sizes, mrmmum lot size and maximum lot size !'YJ~ ~~ 1 I (PLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTERIINITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 5 • Attached (indicate whetherund• renta! or for sale units) • 21 JAntiapated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(sJ $ to Rent (per month) 22) Specify number of bedrooms by urnt type 23J Indicate anticipated household srze by unit tYPe to 24)Indicate the expected number of schoo/ children who will be res~dmg wrfhm the pro/act Contact the appropnate School Disincts as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c SemorHigh COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND tNST/TUTIONAL PROJECTS 25)Descnbe type o/use(s) andma/orfuncbon(s) of commercial, mdustnal ormshtuhonal uses through wholesale auction. 26J Total floor area of commercial, ~ndustnal, or rnshtut~onal uses by type 14,873 s.f. . H~o ~~ ~ I \PLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTER\INITSTDI WPD 3/00 storage and distribution of automobiles, including Page 6 • 27J Indicate hours of operation • ; O OAM to B : O O PM • 28J Number of Total employees 4 0 MaximumShrR 40 Time o/Maximum Sh~R 8 : OOAM to 5 : OOPM 29JProv~de breakdown of anticipatedlob classifications, mclud~ng wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndroat~on of the rate of him for each classification (attach addd~onal sheet d necessary) A rox. 1/2 office ersonnel and 1/2 yard workers/truck drivers Hire rate N/A. 30J Estimation of the number of workers to be head that curren8y reside in the Gty 40 '31J For commercial and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venried through the South Coast Air Quality Management D~stnct, at (B18J 572-6283) 10-20 Auto haulers (diesel) 2-6 fork-lifts (diesel ALL PROJECTS 32J Have the water, sewer, hm, end flood control agenaes serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine their ability to prowde adequate service to the proposed pro/ect? lfso, please indicate their response Water/Sewer/Fire - tr - Y Water - Y Bernadino F n ~~~ 11PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSI000NTERIINITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 7 33 In the known history of this prop., has there been any use, storage, or discharg•I hazardous and/or toxic matenals ~Examp/es of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB=s, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, of/s, so/vents, and otherAammable liquids and gases A/so note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known 34JWill the proposed pro/ect mvotve the temporary or long-term use, storage or dscharge of hazardous and/ortoxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above9 /(yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of dispose/ The location of such uses, along wdh the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans One (1) above round diesel fuel tank for onsite fork-lifts l heroby certify that the statements tumished above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and information requm=d for adequate evaluation of this protect to the best of my abi/ity, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief l further understand that additional inlormation may be required to be submitted be/ore an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date Signature Title C_~ N8 ~~ 11PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERIINITSTDI WPD 3/00 Page 8 OGT 22 2001 18:04 MP ~SERJET 3200 ~ P, L 2 J9) In Me knnMr Alzrory d fha pmparfy, Aaa Ma» bwn any uae, eferaga, or aVSthsrya d Aazuddue end4r fork mebdale) Erempbe d hezardoud andbr lark mafensb lndude, bul ue not tlmhrd M PC9ro; ndkadlue eubatencya,• peeNNClee end he~blddea, flrela dle, eolvvAi, and abler IWnrnsbb Abulde and peaea Also nods undap/aNld elonW o1 any d Me above. Please 6af fha mab~iela end detcdbe fheN un, eforape, endbr dfsMerye an fhe P~dPeobG al Mull se Ms defer dl Yae, U ImoMn None. 3I)WN Ma pmposadP+gieot Involve pN bmporlNy a Aup-M~m ue•, elonye or dacAega W AezeNaua erMbr fngc mebde/1 MclucYnp 6uf not imlfed fo Moe axert>fWa llefad abow7 /1 yaz, provMA en vrvenfory o/ eN eucA msfsdale W be used end Pmpoe~d msMOd d diepoaal the locsfbn dl ouch arse, ekvp M1MA Ma etaeps end aMpmenf anss, sAe/l bs aAOMn and bbebd on fAa aPpNOeIlon Whoa, _ One fl) above around diebel fuel tank for onsite fork lifta l hereby aieYy Mef Me efefwnanfe M7gehed ebow end N tM adeclnd arAlbMe prneanf fhe deb and bkrmaYan ngv/red for adsquele sveluelbn dUNz pn~bd ro Me beef dmy ebkMy, dal Ms lads, clefs sod inR,rniadOn presended w Mw end earecYrot lb Dee1 d my hnoMlsdpe and DaUd / AMAar r,nds>nany Mel eddA4ond Edo y 6e robs subn(ted before en adequeb .svaluellon can bo made by We GlY d Aenclro Cunnwn0e ~ ~~~ orb .2 -Q H9 ~D'Nhee, 7A/a.• LIPLANNINGIFINALIFORM5I000NT~RIINITSTOI,yypp ypp 3 Pepo B BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: DRC2001-00675 2. Related Files: Previously approved DR 99-70 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Rewew (DRC2001-006751 - COPART INC - A proposed 14,860 SF office structure to support a weekly auto auction on 33 58 acres, and 9 39 acres of additional storage area on the adiacent SCE parcel, for a total protect area of 42 97 acres, located at 12167 Arrow Route in the Heavy Industrial Distract (Subarea 15). APN 229-121-15 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: COPART, Inc 5500 East Second Street, 2nd Floor Beniaa, CA 94510 5. General Plan Designation: Heavy Industrial 6. Zoning: Heavy Industrial (Subarea 15) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The surrounding property to the west and south is vacant, industrially-zoned property. The property to the east is developed as the an alcohol conversion plant, the property north of Arrow Route has been developed with industrial buildings intended for manufacturing, warehouse and/or distribution. The Metrolink ratl line forms the south boundary of the site, the I-15 freeway forms the west boundary of the protect. The applicant intends to conclude a lease with Southern California Edison, in a desire to use the SCE corridor as additional automobile storage space associated with this protect The SCE corridor contains ahigh-voltage transmission Ime, and there are restricted use zones within 50-feet of the two towers located on the site This site was once the home of AMPAC, a concrete pipe manufacturer, remnants of the operation remain, including perimeter landscaping, structures, and numerous concrete pads The smaller of the existing buildings will be demolished, and the applicant proposes to clean-up and retain the largest existing bwlding The existing trees on the perimeter of the site will be retained, including the landscaping along Arrow Route There are no natroe plants remaining on the site • ~ i~ ~~~ 1._.J ~~ Initial Study for DRC2001-00675-COPART, INC City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Debra Meier, AICP (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: • Approval of a Hazardous Materials Business Plan by City Office of Emergency Services and San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services • Regional Water Quality Control Board permits for underground fuel storage tanks. • Since grading onsite will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). • The pro)ect will also require a General Construction Activity Storm Water Runoff Permit from the SW RCB. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is °Potentially Significant Impact," °Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° or "Less Than Significant Impact° as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. OLand Use and Piamm~g ()Population and Housing tni ' mnspvnauorv~ircuianon (x) Biological Resources ()Public Services (x) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources ()Utilities and Service Systems (x) Aesthetics (x) Water (x) Air Quality ()Hazards x (x) Noise ()Cultural Resources !xl Mandatnrv F~nriinn° nr c~,.na~,.~.,..e O Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation. (x) I find that although the proposed pro)ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed ~~~'/~i~t/~/~~~~Z,r/C/ Debra Meier Contract Planner December 27, 2001 ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is regwred for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified 1. LAND USE AND PL.APIMNCti Would the proposal. a) Conflict with general plan designation or () () () (x) zoning b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (x) pollees adopted by agencies with turisdiction over the protect c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (x) wamty? d) Disrupt or diwde the physical arrangement of an () () () (x) established community Comments: a/b) The proposed protect is designed m conformance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Industrial Districts Subarea 15 Subarea 15 is intended for Heavy Industrial uses, no increase m density or pla n amendment is proposed c/d) The proposed auto wholesale storage and auction facility is consistent with the intent of Subarea 15 of the Industrial Districts, and goals of the General Plan to encourage automobile-related uses long the I-15 corridor The proposed use is compatible with the existing industrial activities in the vicinity. The protect boundary will be completely fenced with a view obstructing material and landscaped in order to screen the auto storage from the freeway to the extent possible. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSMCz Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (x) population protections b) Induce substantial growth m an area either O O O (x) directly or indirectly (e g ,through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator mfrastructure)~ c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (x) housing ~~ ~~O Initial Study for DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Comments: a/b) Construction activities associated with the proposed project will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Operation of the auto storage and wholesale auction will include approximately 20 office personnel, and 20 storage yard staff and truck drivers The addition of these employees will not create a demand for additional housing, COPART expects to hire individuals from within the community to fill these positions Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding commurnties are typically considered housing-rich, industrial development such as this will assist the City in achieving a balance between lobs and housing thus achieving one of SCAG's major goals for the sub-region. c) The site is that of a previous concrete pipe manufacturer No existing housing is located on-site or within the immediate vicinity as the area is designated for - industrial uses 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts mvolwng. a) Fault ruptures () () () (x) b) Seismic ground shakings () () (x) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () () () (x) d) Seiche hazards () () () (x) e) Landslides or mudfiows~ () () () (x) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable () () () (x) soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (x) h) Expansive soils () () () (x) Q Urnque geologic or physical features () () () (x) Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an earthquake Fault Hazard Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 2 5 miles north and west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 8 miles northwest These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to a Mw 7 5 earthquake is approximately 12 miles northeast of the site, and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producing up to a Mw 8 2 earthquake, is located approximately 13 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant d) The site is not located near a body of water e) The site is relatively flat, and has been previously used as a manufacturing operation The land is not susceptible to landslides or mudflows N -~ ~7 Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC Page 5 . f-h) Sods encountered during the site investigation conducted by RMA Group (July 1999) included man-made artificial fill alluvium soils The artificial fill soils were found to consistent of a surficial layer of gravel (3 to 12 inches), and a layer of silty sands (2 to 7 feet) The site also includes various piles of concrete rubble, metal cables, and miscellaneous debns. The sods encountered on the site consist of granular artificial fill and alluvial sods. These soils are not considered expansive Pnor to placement of compacted fills, compressible sods shall be over-excavated to natural ground, and complete removal of artificial fill, concrete and other debris must be accomplished pnor to grading. All on-site grading shall be preformed under the supervision of a licensed civil engineer Q The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. 4. WATER. Will the proposal result ~n a) Changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (x) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (x) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () (x) () ( ) of surface water quality (e g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes m the amount of surface water in any () () () (x) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (x) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (x) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an agwfer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (x) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (x) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (x) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies ~ ~ ~~8 ~_J Initial Study for DRC2001-00675-COPART, INC City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Comments: a) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, and the rate and amount of surface water run-off due to the amount of new hardscape proposed on the site All run-off within the site drains toward the south The front (northerly) portion of the site, that is primarily paved, includes a surface drainage system the directs flows to the southwest portion of the parking lot where the water is captured into a catch basin and directed in a pipe proposed under the paved auction viewing area, to a rip-rap outlet structure All existing structures (except one) and debris will be removed from the rear portion of the site, which will be graded and covered with decomposed granite or similar material. At the south boundary of the site is an existing concrete channel that catches the on-site water and directs it into an existing 66-inch pipe that outlets to Day Creek Channel to the west The City Engineer must approve the final grading and drainage plans prior to issuance of grading permits, and the impact is not considered significant. b) The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain as indicated on Figure V-5 "Flood Hazards" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water The Day Creek Channel is located west boundary of the SEC Corridor, the concrete-lined channel contains water intermittently generally during heavy storms As a standard condition of development, the applicant is required to provide a drainage study depicting how storm water run-off will be conveyed both during grading and construction, and once the site is developed and occupied, prior to issuance of grading permits Since grading onsite will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) The protect will also require a General Construction Actroity Storm Water Runoff Permit from the SWRCB. Both the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will regwre the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or stormwater conveyance channels BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the protect by the Building Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP will make this impact less than sigrnficant ~~~ ~~9 Initial Study for DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC City of Rancho Cucamonga Panes 7 f-i) The site wdl not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area because the site is not intended to be used for groundwater recharge 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contnbute to () (x) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to poliutants~ () () (x) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, () () () (x) or cause any change in climate d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (x) Comments: a-b) The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unrfied Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The cntena pollutants screened for included. reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO,), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Two of these, ROG and NO^, are ozone precursors Though not regwred, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6'" edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model The protect construction and operational emissions do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of sigrnficance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is ninon-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contribution to regional emission of cntena pollutants u ~NI~ X30 • Initial Study for DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 8 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary Pounds er Da Source ROG NO^ CO PM,a Unmet Md Unmet Met Unmrt Met Unmrt Md Gradin 3 75 3 75 50 02 47 52 0 14 0.14 24.64 10.31 Worker Tn s 0 05 0 05 0 07 0 07 0 14 0 14 0 01 0 01 Stationa E w 0 34 0.34 0 27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E ui 2.24 2.13 23 68 22 50 - - 1 77 1 68 Arch Coatin s 16 66 15 83 - - - _ _ _ As halt 0 26 0 25 - - _ _ _ _ Totals 23 30 22 16 74 OS 70 37 0.14 0 14 26 44 12 02 SCAOMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si rnficance No No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary Pounds er Da I. Source ROG NO, CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Mit. Unmet Met Area Source 0 01 0 01 0 10 0 10 0 04 0 04 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 12 92 12 92 79 65 79 65 42 18 42 18 6 75 6 75 Totals 12 93 12 93 79.75 79 75 42 22 42 22 6 75 6 75 SCAOMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No Generally, construction of a protect this size wtll not exceed SCAOMD thresholds for PM,o and NOx during grading activities, nor SCAOMD thresholds for developed conditions (operational impacts) for NO, Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented During grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated There are no sensitive receptors in the immediate area, however the state is in non-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust, which will be mitigated by the following measures 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. 3. Streets bordering the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,a emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon • time of year of construction. 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed ~ ,~ 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. ~a~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC Page 9 5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and equpment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase N0, and PM,o levels in the area The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels 6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9. Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt. Total CO emissions as shown in Table 2 are generated from employees/visitors traveling to the office building Additional CO emissions are expected for vehicles traveling to the auto action, however, the trips associated with the operation of the auto action do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds, as compared to similar or like uses (i e a sporting event) During operation, folk-lifts and other vehicles traveling over exposed surfaces will increase PM,o levels in the area. The following mitigation measure will ensure PM,o emissions are below the SCAOMD's threshold of significance 10. Areas that are not paved, shall be compacted and covered with gravel, decomposed granites, slag or similar surface, to minimize fugitive dust. c-d) The proposed protect include bwlding and approximately 43 generate emissions that could odors that may be associated the site from an on-site fuel st immediate area of the tank ~18 s the construction of a 14,860 square foot office acres of car parking and storage This will not cause climatic changes Control of obtectionable with fueling of the up to six fork-lifts operated on orage tank will be minimal, and restricted to the ~~ i • Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC Page 10 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result gyn. a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () (x) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g., () () () (x) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (x) nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? () () () (x) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or () () () (x) bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted pollees supportng O O O (x) alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Red or air traffic impacts? O O O (x) Comments: a) The proposed protect wdl include 40 employees at the site on a daily basis, and one day per week approximately 200 individuals will arrive to attend the auto auction. Truck deliveries and departures wdl occur sporadically each day The proposed protect is located within a larger industrial area for which the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to the issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation In addition, the protect is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress form the site onto Arrow Route Compliance with the conditions of approval wdl ensure that protected-related traffic impacts are less than sigrnficant b-d) Access to the site wilt provided through a 35-foot drive-approach onto Arrow Route, the site has sufficient room for maneuvering of emergency vehicles around the proposed structure and the vehicle storage area The design of the site provides for ample visitor/customer and employee parking as well as designated parking for large trucks and traders e-f) A Regional Multi-purpose Trail runs parallel to the Day Creek Flood Control Channel (General Plan Figure III-13), and a Class 2 bike path is proposed along Arrow Route (General Plan Figure III-7) Arrow Route is included as a Local/Route Deviation Transit Service Corridor (General Plan Figure III-6) The proposed protect does not prevent the implementation of the trail, bikeway, or transit master plans of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. g) The protect site is located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport flight path and poses no impact to air traffic. The BNSF/Metroling rail line form the south boundary of the site The protect is not presently design for red service, however, neither will the protect impede to rail traffic along this ) ~ route Q 33 Initial Study for DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result rn impacts to• a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or () () () (x) their habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e g ,heritage trees, () (x) () ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g., () () () (x) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )? d) Wetland habitat (e g., marsh, ripanan, and () () () (x) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corndors~ O O O (x) Comments• a/c/d) The protect site has previously been used for industrial activity and is void of native species on site However, the SCE corridor, which will be used in conjunction with auto storage, has not been previously developed, however it has previously been used as a vineyard. A Biological Site survey was conducted by SCE on August 31, 2001, and subsequently a protocol survey for Delhi Sands flowering-loving Fly was completed in July 2001, and protocol trapping for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat was completed in November 2001 The common species on the site include western ragweed (Ambrosia ps~lostachya), California buckwheat (Enogonum fasiculatum) deer weed (Lotus scopanus), common sunflower (Helranthus annuus), black mustard (Brassica nrgra), horehound (Marrubium vugare), telegraph weed (Heterotheca grad~flora), tree tobacco (N~cotrana glauca) and Califorrna Croton (Croton cal~fornica) The area is extensively overgrown with weedy vegetation, particularly with black mustard and western ragweed Although some elements of coastal sage scrub are present, including California buckwheat and a few individuals of coastal sage (Artemrsra cal~forrnca) The protocol surveys concluded that neither the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly nor the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat were present on the site SCE staff has forwarded the conclusions and result of these surveys to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, no further mitigation measures have been recommended by the biologists due to the absence of the critical speces b) The perimeter of the site contains existing trees along portions of the south boundary, and the north boundary and along the Arrow Route frontage The site has been designed to retain existing trees to the extent feasible 11. Any trees that are identified for removal as a result of unforeseen details related to grading or site improvements, will require a tree removal permit prior to the issuance of the grading permit. ~ ~o ~ ~/ Initial Study for DRC2001-00675-COPART, INC. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 e) Industrial development to the north, along with the I-15 freeway and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel, have eliminated wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past • 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (x) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (x) ineffiaent manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (x) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a/b) The prolect is regwred to conform to applicable City Standards for energy conservation c) The prolect site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resources Zone (MRZ-2), which contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a designated area of available resources, nor is it identified by the City General Plan (Figure IV-1) as an area of significant aggregate resources, due to the urbanization of the area 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () (x) () ( ) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (x) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (x) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (x) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (x) brush, grass, or trees Comments: a/c) The proposed prolect includes an auto wholesale auction and auto collection yard, up to 6 forklifts will be used on the site to move vehicles within the storage area Fuel for the fork-lifts will be provided by a aboveground fuel storage tank The applicant must obtain appropriate permits from the City Office of Emergency Services (Fire Protection District), and the County of San Bernardino Hazardous ~ ~~ ~ 3.~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC Page 13 . Material Droision The following mitigation measure will ensure impacts are less than sigrnficant 12. All appropriate permits will be obtained prior to certificate of occupancy and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services (Fire Protection District) Office. These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to less than significant impact. b) The proposed protect includes one adequate driveway for emergency response vehicles The site currently contains existing structures that are no longer used, and the SEC corridor has been previously cultivated as a vineyard The site wdl be graded, paved, and landscaped in accordance with approved plans c) The proposed fueling of the fork-lifts from the aboveground fuel storage tank will expose people to vapors containing benzene, a known carcinogen However, due to limited nature of the use of fuel and the small number of vehicles and employees associated with this activity, these exposures fall below significant thresholds set by the Califorrna Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), therefore this is a less than sigrnficant impact. d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored sods were observed onsite There was no indication of underground storage tanks based on on-site investigations and soil sampling, however there has been an accumulation of concrete, rebar and construction-related refuse on the rear portion of the site that wall be removed prior to grading and use of the site e) The protect site is located within a developing industrial portion of the City Development of the site will remove dry vegetation and unused structures, and continued development of the area will decrease the potential of fire within the vicinity 10. NOISE. Wdl the proposal result ~n a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (x) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (x) Comments: a/b) The proposed protect may produce noticeable short-tem construction-related noise, and the completed protect would incrementally increase noise related to increase truck and vehicle activity on the site The protect is located in a heavy industrial area where the noise environment is currently impacted by the I-15 freeway and the BNSF/Metrolink rail line There are no sensitive receptors on the immediate area . N~ ~ac~ Initial Study for DRC2001-00675-COPART, INC City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result m a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas a) Fire protections () () () (x) b) Police protection? () () () (x) c) Schools? () () () (x) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including () () () (x) roads e) Other governmental services () () () (x) Comments: a) Fire Protection -The prolect site is served by a Fire Station 174 located at the southwest corner of Jersey and Milliken Avenues, approximately 1 5 miles form the prolect site Standard conditions of approval, and compliance with Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be result in no impacts to fire services ~~ b) Police Protection -The construction of a 14,860 square foot office and related auto storage facility wdl only incrementally increase the need for police protection in the industrial area The prolect will not result m the need for increased patrolman in the area. The perimeter will be fenced with view- obstructing material and the site will be appropriately gated and access controlled for security c) Schools -The proposed prolect will generate approximately 40 employees that are expected to be drawn from within the commurnty The prolect will not adversely impact local schools, nevertheless school impact fees for commercial/industrial development, as determined by the school district, are collected at the time of bwldmg permit issuance d/e) Public Faalities/Government Services -The proposed prolect wdl utilize existing public facilities and is consistent with the land use designation of the Heavy Industrial Distract Park and recreation opportunities are not impacted or affected by the proposed prolect 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utdrt~es a) Power or natural gasp b) Communication systems c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facdiUes~ d) e) f) 9) ~~ Sewer or septic tanks Storm water drainage Solid waste disposal? Local or regional water supplies ~~ O O O (x) O O O (x) O O O (x) U O O (x) O O O (x) O O O (x) O O U (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC Page 15 Comments: a/b) The protect will utilize power, communication and natural gas systems that are available in the immediate area No significant extensions of these facilities are regwred to serve the site c-e) Sewage collection and treatment, as well as water, is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District An existing 30-inch sewer line, and a i6-inch water line, in Arrow Route are sufficient to serve the 14,860 square foot office building proposed at the site f/g) Solid waste will be collected by the City franchised waste hauler and taken to a regional landfill in either San Bernardino, River side or Orange Counties for disposal The developed prolect will incrementally increase demand on the existing storm dram system due to the increased amount of hardscape at the site On-site catch basins will convey drainage to the public system located at the south boundary of the prolect site, no substantial alterations to the public system are regwred to accommodate development of the site 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenc highways () () () (x) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic () () () (x) effect c) Create light or glare? () () (x) ( ) Comments: a/b) The protect site is wsibte from the I-15 freeway which forms the west boundary of the protect The freeway is elevated at this location for a view down onto the site The existing landscaping along the west property boundary will be protected and enhanced in order to break the wew of parked vehicles on the site The entire boundary will be fenced with aview-obstruction metal fence, with the exception of the Arrow Route frontage and along the south boundary formed by the Metrolink rail line where masonry block walls will be used Landscaping will also be used along the south boundary for additional screening The front portion of the site (within 1000 feet of Arrow Route) includes a minimum of 10% of the site area in landscaping, while the remainder of the site includes a minimum 5% of the site in landscaping The landscaping along Arrow Route will be protected and enhanced c) The development of the proposed protect will create new light and glare as the site is currently an abandoned industrial facility The design and placement of the light fixtures is required to be shown on plans, along with a photometric lighting diagram, in order to review for consistency with City standards There are no sensitive receptors in the immediate area and the impact of additional lighting at the site will not be significant J ~1 ~~ ~ ~8 U Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675-COPART, INC Page 16 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb paleontological resources () () () (x) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (x) c) Affect histoncal or cultural resources O O O (x) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change () () () (x) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses within O O O (x) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The site has previously been used for industrial activity, including construction of structures No cultural resources were discovered during the previous construction protect, and research was conducted on the SCE property pnor to commencing with lease negotiations with COPART The closest recorded historic resource is the Santa Fe Railroad (CA-SBR-68471 H) which is now used for Metrolink rail transit and forms the south boundary of the site The development of the site wdl not negatively affect this resource. 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (x) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities () () () (x) Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely as the matority of the employees will be drawn from the local community The protect is not expected to increase the demand for housing and recreation al opportunities b) The proposed protect is located within the Heavy Industral distract The nearest recreational facility is the baseball complex on Rochester north of Arrow Route The protect will have no impact on existing parks or other recreational facilities • ~~ 3 °1 Initial Study for DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have () (x) () ( ) the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or arnmal, or eliminate important examples of the mator penods of Califorrna history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () (x) () ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively beef, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts () () () (x) that are indrndually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (x) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indvectly~ Comments• a) The Irntial Study did not identify any sigrnficant adverse impacts to biological resources There is little or no vegetation on the old AMPAC site, the SCE corridor parcel area is extensively overgrown with weedy vegetation, particularly with black mustard and western ragweed Although some elements of coastal sage scrub are present, including Califorrna buckwheat and a few individuals of coastal sage (Artemisia californ~ca) The protocol surveys concluded that neither the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly nor the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat were present on the site b) The proposed protect will generate fugitive dust during grading and construction activities The contractor will be regwred to minimize dust generation through water applications per the City's standard conditions of approval Additional mitigation measures presented in Section 5 of this Initial Study will reduce impacts to less than significant Noise associated with site construction will not result in an impact, as there are no sensitive receptors within the area ri~~ ~j~b J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675-COPART, INC Page 18 c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Genera Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for sigmficanl adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and sphere of influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred d) Development of the proposed automobile auction would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The initial study identified impacts to air quality as having a potentially sigmficant affect to the environment However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to less than sigmficant EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (x) General Plan EIR (Draft October 2001) (x) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (x) Geological Investigation by RMA Group dated July 28, 1999 (x) Focused Survey for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving fly by Forensic Entomology Services dated October 6, 2001 (x) Results of Trapping for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat by Natural Resources Assessment dated November 11, 2001 (x) Initial Study Part II for DR 99-70 dated January 26, 2000 N ~ ~ ~'i ) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC Page 19 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described m this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate ~h~ effects tot where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature Print Name and Title de. _ s~ /l ' 3 ~G 7i ~~ t`~r L_J Hai ~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The /ollowing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review DRC2001-00675 Public Review Period Closes: January 23, 2002 Project Name: Project Applicant: COPART, Inc Project Location (also see attached map). Located at 12167 Arrow Route - APN 229-121-15 Project Description: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00675 - COPART, INC - A proposed 14,873 square foot office structure to support a weekly auto auction on 33 5 acres, and 9 4 acres of additional storage area on the adtacent Southern California Edison (SCE) parcel, for a total of 42 9 acres in the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15) FINDING • This is to advise that the Cky of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine d the project may have a signdcant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The In~hal Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The In~hal Study utentified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declarahon was released far public review would avoK! the effects or m~6gate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached InRial Study. The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public ~s mvked to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. • January 23, 2002 Date of Determination Adopted By 1'I~J RESOLUTION NO 02-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00675, LOCATED AT 12167 ARROW ROUTE IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 15) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 229-121-15 A Recitals 1 COPART Inc filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00675, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 23rd day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 23, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 12167 Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 231 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,730 feet, and is presently improved with some penmeter landscaping, two buildings (one of which will be demolished), and concrete pads, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is improved with a warehouse distnbution fanlity, the property to the south consists of the Metrolink rail Ime, the propertyto the east is Parallel Products, an alcohol distillery, and the property to the west is the I-15 Freeway, and c The project proposes automobile storage and processing and a weeklywholesale auction on 33 5 acres of private property and 9 4 acres of an adjacent Southern California Edison (SCE) right-of-way, for a total site area of 42 9 acres m the Heavy Industnal Distnct 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectrves of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the ob~ectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the Heavy Industnal distnct in which the site is located, and ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-15 DRC2001-00675 - COPART INC January 23, 2001 Page 2 c The proposed use is m compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Momtonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed below as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect wdl have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) All exterior equipment, tanks, silos, and similar extraneous items shall be removed from the existing structure 2) The split-face block wall shall be coordinated with the building material for color and material 3) The metal fence shall be textured and color-coated to match the split- face block wall ~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-15 DRC2001-00675 - COPART INC January 23, 2001 Page 3 4) The storage of severely damaged vehicles shall be placed on the most eastern portion of the site 5) Any temporary storage of vehicles within the future freeway on-ramp shall be screened subtect to City Planner review and approval 6) A mix of tall and large evergreen trees planted at 8 feet on center shall be provided within the landscape planters along the west property boundary and the mid-portion of the site 7) The 8-foot masonry wall shall be extended along the south boundary of the freeway ramp at the time the ramp is constructed across the SCE property, if the -SCE property is being used by COPART as a part of I~- this approval. Enaineenng Droision 1) The City transportation fee for development of the proposed 14,860 square foot office bwlding is $30,493 61 The determination of the drainage fee shall be determined as follows Total protect area minus 18 28 acres times $5,000 00 per acre or the current fee in effect at the time of budding permd issuance 2) Revise City Drawing #1433 for the improvement alterations along Arrow Route Scored colored concrete paving is not allowed in the public nght-of-way 3) The existing dnve approach at the easterly boundary was installed for emergency access and, therefore, is not constructed of Standard wwdth regwrements It shall be removed and replaced per City standard, 35-foot minimum width Environmental Mitigation Water 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Streets bordenng the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoaated vnth vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of ~ y~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-15 DRC2001-00675 - COPART INC January 23, 2001 Page 3 4) The storage of severely damaged vehicles shall be placed on the most eastern portion of the site 5) Any temporary storage of vehicles within the future freeway on-ramp shall be screened subtect to City Planner review and approval 6) A mix of tall and large evergreen trees planted at 8 feet on center shall be provided within the landscape planters along the west property boundary and the mid-portion of the site 7) The 8-foot masonry wall shall be extended along the south boundary of the freeway ramp at the time the ramp is constructed across the SCE property Enaineenna Diwsion 1) The City transportation fee for development of the proposed 14,860 square foot office bulding is $30,493 61 The detemtination of the drainage fee shall be determined as follows Total protect area minus 18 28 acres times $5,000 00 per acre or the current fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance 2) Revise City Drawing #1433 for the improvement alterations along Arrow Route Scored colored concrete paving is not allowed in the public nght-of-way 3) The existing dnve approach at the easterly boundary was installed for emergency access and, therefore, is not constructed of Standard v~ndth requirements It shall be removed and replaced per City standard, 35-foot minimum width Environmental Mitigation Water 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) datly to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 • 2) Streets bordenng the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-15 DRC2001-00675 - COPART INC January 23, 2001 Page 4 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all reactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy effiGency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean-alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use i 8) Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt 9) Areas that are not paved shall be compacted and covered with gravel, decomposed granites, slag or similar surface, to mirnmize fugilive dust Brologrcal Resources 1) Existing trees shall be preserved in place Any trees that are identified for removal as a result of unforeseen details related to grading or site improvements will require a Tree Removal Permit pnor to the issuance of the grading permit Hazards 1) All appropnate permits will be obtained pnorto certificate of occupancy and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services (Fire Protection Distnct) Office 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman v ~7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-15 DRC2001-00675 - COPART INC January 23, 2001 Page 5 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS F-/ '`~ g City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project Fite No.: DRC2001-00675 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 `" I J Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 • 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's Is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible Clty department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4 The protect planner or responsible City department well approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was Identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors If compliance with any aspects of the MMP Is not occurring afterwntten notification has been Issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached • hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold Issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are Implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Directorpnor to the issuance of building permits. I \FINALICEQAVviMP Form-rev wpd u ~5b MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC 2001-00675 Applicant: COPART Inc. Initial Study Prepared by: Debra Meter Date: December 27 2001 U~ ' - is V' 1 %! ;~Blolo9y~,>-'~„x'~; I ,vtx ~e ;`,v. „ Any trees that are Ide tifi d f 1~ ~ ,~: ~ s,~ ~ , CP ., _ ¢ q ~ ~ - .. 3 ~ - ~ . e r . .~f, ~,~ ;a~. '-''`f^v~~'k~:ti `` n e or removal as a result of unforeseen details related to grading or site Improvements, will require a tree B Review of final site Improvement plans A/C p removal permit pdor to Issuance of the grading permit Water" t The applicant shall Identify BMPS to be Implemented during the CE C ^ Review grading A/C yq pedod the site Is under construction plans/Site Inspecllon '`%1It'GlualityLwA;~,,~~?^;ie'?~-,~~;~i~ s~~~''~~,rrrv""~8;st~~``~,"~` ,. - ~.4 ;;: .,.3r r*y.. ..~ x.u ""fi~iVx3er, `,k~` ~~,',~i+;e~"~,i~~tiF~~~~a `4S.'r,~ r"~.i+b~ o,~$5" ~ w«s~,~ a~,p++a~r~t~ ~i~~.~a~,V d~- ~,ti7' ~~ ~,,. :,~'. e: ~s r!~"~T~`~ ~'" ..~i' ~" `'5 ~ r,,, - r .,a i No 'svsG,vrR ~~FSi' >~'F'~~~. {, ~ ~ The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent) . CP C , . .u? 3 .43 :r-, -eV Review of plans e~ 4 .4A1 A/C '. ,4 t~~ .. ~F'~tN.y>~P, :~+I~~C ~ `^`.Slti approved by SCAQMD and RWGCB) daily to reduce PM,o 2 emission, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Streets bordedng the site shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of lans A/C established by the Ciry to reduce PM,a emissions associated with p 2 vehicle tracking of soil off-site Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes CP C Review of plans A/C 2 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions CP C Review of plans A/C 2 Contractor shall select the construction equipment based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency All construction equipment will be tuned antl maintained In accordance with the ' CP B/C manufacturer s speclhcations Review of I pans A/C 2 Contractor shall utilize electdc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP B/C Review of plans A/C p plans Include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt CP B/C Review of plans C 2 Areas that are not paved, shall be compacted and covered with gravel, decomposed granite, slag, or similar surface to minimize CP B/D Review of plans A/C 3 fugitive dust • r- - ,. ' ~~ - - _ • ~~>~ ~• - All appropriate permits will be obtained prior to certificate of FC D Approved prior to ~ B/D 3 occupancy and documented in the Business Emergency - Contingency Plan approved b Ciry Emer S i occupancy and use , y gency erv ces (Fire) of the site Ke to Checklist Abbreviations ~;`Respbnsitile7P,erson~ ` , ;, ;~yit onlto~l~iB:F~eque~gY>'~~i~~,~; ; ; ;,,i~g ; o~;Ve'r~itlceUo „' •,x E~g,v~. 6~ ``~~ "~R CDD-Communi Develo ment Director ty P A - W Ith Each New Development A - On-site Inspection s ~ CP -City Planner or designee B • Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map 2 W CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check - ithhold Grading or Building Permit BO - Bwltling Official or designee D • On Completion D - Separete Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating FC -Fire Chief or designee 5 • Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP ~INAL\CEOAVv1MCHKLST W PD (~(~ v\ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENI~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00675 SUBJECT: OFFICE BUILDING FOR AUTO AUCTION AND STORAGE APPLICANT: COPART LOCATION: 12167 ARROW ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the altematrve, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and ali Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expve if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations ~i 53 Completion Dat~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- sc-11-01 Protect No DRC2001-00675 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner _ _ _ 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code _//_ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be //_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not warve compliance with all sections of the Development _/_/ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in _ effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and // approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of _ building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, _/I_ and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall / / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 11 Etght~x-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the pro/ect perimeter as _I_/ /~ noted on the Site Plan If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a / good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 12 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be /_/_ manufactured products Buil ding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commeraal and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main / / building colors D SC-11-01 2 I~`r~.' y Protect No DRC2001-00675 CompleUOn Date 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all I / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner _ _ _ 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code / / and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall _ _ _ be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwldmg and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits _ _ _ 5 All stte, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ _ budding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and appltcable Community or Specific Plans in _ _ _ effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and / / approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) pnor to the issuance of _ _ _ bwiding permits Such plan shall indicate style, diuminatton, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are regwred and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, / / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Cary Planner review and approval _ _ _ . pnor to the issuance of budding permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall / / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of _ _ _ concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All budding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination _ _ _ 11 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter as noted on / / the Site Plan If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith _ _ _ effort to work with the ad/Dining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 12 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be I / manufactured products _ D. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and _ streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans • 2 For commercial and d t l t t ll d in us ria protec s, pain ro -up oors and service doors to match main / / budding colors --- i,f , f SC-11-01 2 Protect No DRC2001-00675 Comoleuon Date E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) • 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space / / abuts a bwiding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a mirnmum of _ _ _ 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) _ _ 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, / / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards --- 4 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer and / / , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pnor to issuance of buildin _ _ _ g permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or / / mare parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total _ _ _ number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for / / commercial, office, and industrial faaltties at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area _ _ _ If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet F Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, includrng slope planting and model home _/_/_~ landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdrotston 2 Existing trees requred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction bamer _/_/_ in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercal and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three _!_/_ parking stalls, suffiaent to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of / / one tree per 30 linear feet of building --- 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be _/_/_ included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Drnsion 7 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specmen size trees, I _/_/_ meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Arrow Route g ~5 SC-11-01 g Protect No DRC2001-00675 Com~hon Date 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems requred to be installed within the public right-of-way on _/_/_ the penmeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, / / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division --- 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code 11 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the _/_/_ freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this project or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and Ctty Standards through the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Ctty Planner and Ctty Engrneer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the pro/ect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way G. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted approval Any signs proposed for this and shall require separate application installation of any signs plans are conceptual only and not a part of this _/_/_ development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and approval by the Planning Division prior to H. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the pro/ect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/ / a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and SC-11-01 4~ S~ Project No DRC2001-00675 Completion Date g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils _/_/_ report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal J K. 3 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls I / / 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation _/_/ coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by /_/ the Bwidmg and Safety Dtwsion Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (t e , CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Budding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Bwidmg and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Pnor to issuance of bwlding penrnts for a new commercial or industrial development or _/_/_ addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwlding and Safety Drviston prior to permit issuance 3 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 4 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public /_/ counter) New Structures Provide draft stops rn attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC I _/_/_ Table 5-A L. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Bwlding Code, City _/_/_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / ! perform such work --- 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at / ! the time of application for grading plan check --- 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of bwldtng _/_/_~ permits ~ ~~ 7 S~-„-0, 5 Prgect No DRC2001-00675 Comolehon Date 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _//_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• M. Street Improvements 1 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety //_ lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required N. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _I/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer O. Utilities 1 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. P. Security Lighting 1 All parking; and common, ^~~.d otar~ areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle _/_/_ power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, _//_ with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _// SC-11-01 6 ~ ~ 8 Prgect No DRC2001-00675 Comole6on Date 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction prolects and for /_/_ • existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Street Improvements Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety _/_/ lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engmeer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or prroate street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a I _/_/ construction permit shall be obtained from the Crty Engineer's Office m addition to any other permits required N. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting I _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer O. Utilities Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract wdhin 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential prolects APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have mammal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, _/_/_ with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development • 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ ~~ g sc-~ ~ -o~ Project No DRC2001-00675 Comolelion Date Q. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are _/_!_ wtthtn 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ 3 All roof openings giving access to the bulding shall be secured with either von bars, metal _/_/_ gates, or alarmed R. Security Fencing Ali businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the _/ / police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24- hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Umt at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 S. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and I _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in tum save dollars and Itves Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941- I _/_/_• 1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Community Facilities Districts This protect is sub/ect to the requirements of the Meiio-Roos Community Faalities District I _/_/_ U. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the _/_/_ locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Prior to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ speafications, flow test data and calculations for the private water mom system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Fire flow regwrements for this protect shall be 1,625 gallons per minute at a minimum _/_/_ residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fve Code Appendix III-A, as amended The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fve Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, Flushed and operable prior to delivering any _/_/_ • combustible budding materials on-site (t e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division ~~~ SC-11-01 7 Prgect No DRC2001-00675 Completion Date 5 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, Flushed and operable prior to delivering any _/-/- combustible bwldtng materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Ftre Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwider/developer shall submit final test report to the Ftre Safety Division 6 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be _/_/_ conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwider/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the pro/ect shall be shown on the water _/_/ plan submitted for review and approval Include main size - 8 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, -/-/- speafications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 9 Required Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following pnor to the issuance of the building permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and _/_/_ maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the Distract b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance -/-/- agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 10 Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue _/_/ reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner V. Water Availability Prior to the issuance of a bwldtng permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate -/-( fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extmgwshing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow W. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic / / fire sprinkler system --- 2 Any modification or remodel to a fire sprinkler system regwres Fire District approval, and a _/_/_ permit NO WORK is permitted without a permit issued by Fire Construction Services 3 All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupanaes with _/-/- an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requvements (FPS), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system . 4 Prior to the issuance of a bwldtng permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic I -/-/ fire sprinkler system to the Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Distract pennd (~b sc-~ 1-01 g Project No DRC2007-00675 Comolehon Date Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested / / and accepted by the Ftre District --~ The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational _/_/_ immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is requred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupanaes, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies X. Fire Access Commercial Pnor to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map or the issuance of any _/_/_ grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District emergency access roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site 2 Residential & Commercial Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall _/_/ submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional wew, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&Rs, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 3 The minimum width for a Fire District access road or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum inside _/_/_ tum radws is 20 feet The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 4 All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located _/_/_ within 150 feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior bulding openings 5 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase I _/_/_ shall be submitted prior to final budding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information 6 Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire I _/_/_ District's approval of the construction of any gate across required Fire District access roadways/driveways 7 Gated or restricted access requires the installation of a Knox rapid entry system Vehicle _/_/_ access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch Additionally for vehicle access gates, an approved, compatible traffic signal preemption device will be required to open the gate The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch Contact the Fire Safety Division for speafic details and ordering information 8 The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate _/_/_ installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems This condition applies when the Fire Distract determines that such gates or other means of restricting access or delaying response exists 9 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 _/_/_ inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 10 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the fallowing Emergency access, _/_/_ a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches m height shall be provided and maintained sc-1'I-01 s ~ (~ 1 Protect No DRC200'1-00675 Comolehon Date free and clear of any obstrucbons at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire • Distract Standards 11 Amend site access to accommodate Fire District emergency vehicle access /_/_ 12 Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain _/_/_ approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on requred Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed stgnage that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 13 Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in _/_/_ accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&Rs or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&Rs shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes 14 New bwldings other than dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on _/_/_ contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch mimmum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Y. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Pnor to the issuance of a building peramt far combustible construction, the _/_/_ builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire • fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site Z. Building Use Letter 1 Pnor to the issuance of any bulding permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of _/_/_ intended use far each building on-site to the Fire Distract far review and approval Contact the Fire Safety Drvtsion for the form AA. Architectural Building Plans Pnor to approval of a site developmenUuse peranit, or the issuance of a building permit, _/ /_ whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Distract Call the Fire Construction Services Urnt at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal BB. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically _/_/_ described below, which in the tudgement of the Fve Chief is likely to produce conditions, which maybe hazardous to life or property b Operate a place of public assembly / / • c Operate an automobile wrecking yard _/_/_ d Flammable finishes / / / f ~ - SC-11-01 1 p Protect No DRC2001-00675 Comole~on Date e Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet ! / f Flammable and combustible liquid (storage, handling, and/or use) _ _ / /~ g Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 120 gallons) _/_/_ h Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy) _/_I_ i Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing operation / / / Tire storage -Open area used to store mare than 1,000 cubic feet of Gres / / CC. Hazardous Materials 1 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges / / a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet _ _ _ (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 2 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated / / 3 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pesticides, as defined by / / FIFRA, regardless of amount _ _ _ 4 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of / / amount _ _ 5 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding / / the threshold planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated _ _ _ pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Secbon 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 See Appendix B of this guide for an alphabetical list of EHS's • 6 Any business subtect to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act / / (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle _ _ _ hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) that meet the 1998 upgrade requrements To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement, however, EPCRA does regwre full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA faalities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory 7 Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of / / 10 CFR _ _ _ 8 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will / / not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department rewews your Business _ _ _ Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the Cdy from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous material disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance • ~7 l~3 SC-11-01 11 Prgect No DRC2001-00675 Completion Date 9 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is regwred to submit a Plan, is _/_/_ . regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receroing a request from the owner 10 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information _/_/_ regarding hazardous materials at faalities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Pian -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department In some cases additional inforination that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs DD. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 _/_/_ Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any _/_/_ consultant reviews wdl be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Ciwl Engineer ~ t°LJ SC-11-01 12 T H E C I T V O f RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE January 23, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for three previously approved tentative tract maps consisting of 113 single-family lots in the Low Residential Distnct (2~ dwelling units per acres) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located on the southeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street and approximately 300 feet north of the northwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street APN 225-101-44 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14523-1, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14494, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15902 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Density 2 85 units per acre B Surroundino Land Use and Zonino (TT14523 and TT144941 North -Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Proposed Park, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Day Creek Flood Control Channel Surrounding Land Use and Zoning (TT15902) North -Proposed Park Site, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South -Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Single-Family Homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Flood Control Comdor ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES January 23, 2002 Page 2 D Site Charactenstics The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously the University Planned Development), a 715 residential unit pro/ect originally approved as part of the University/Crest Planned Development by the County m 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga The site is composed of three tracts being rough graded m the Planned Development The site is approximately 1,500 feet north of the newly constructed Route 30 Freeway Access to the site is from Day Creek Boulevard ANALYSIS A Background In June 1991, the County of San Bemardmo approved the University/Crest Planned Development m the Citys Etiwanda North area The University/Crest Planned Development entitlements combined two separately owned properties Hnth 1,238 single-family lots, commeraal, school, park, and open space On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a revision to the Development Plan, which among other things, separated the University portion of the development from the Crest portion The University portion of the development has since become Rancho Etiwanda The subtect tracts contain 106 lots within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development B General The applicant is proposing to develop ten floor plans (six of the floor plans provide additional square footage options) with five different architectural styles The styles include Bungalow, Ranch, and Country, as pnmary architectural styles and Santa Barbara and Monterey as secondary styles The pnmary styles will make up 70 percent of the total home product The applicant has proposed enhanced architecture on elevations that back and side onto Day Creek Boulevard and Wtlson Avenue and on all mtenor comer lots The pro/ect is antiapated to be built in eight phases C Design Review Committee On December 18, 2001, the Design Review Committee (Stewart, McNeil, Fong) reviewed the protect and recommended the applicant make architectural revisions (Exhibit "H") The applicant revised the protect, which was reviewed again by the Design Review Committee (McNeel, Stewart, Fong) on January 9, 2002 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subject to staffs comments with additional conditions (Exhibd "I") D Technical Review Committee The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval E Environmental Assessment In June 1991, the County of San Bemardmo certified the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent pro/ects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the County certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Development Plan, which among other things, separated the University (Rancho Etiwanda) portion of the protect from the Crest portion The subtect tracts fall within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development In August 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the pro/ect that would require a ma/or revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES • January 23, 2002 Page 3 F Neighborhood Meetmg On November 27, 2001, the applicant held a neighborhood meeting inviting all homeowners within 300 feet of the subject property Two homeowners were m attendance The pnmary issues of concern were retaining walls and grading forthe v-ditch on the east side portion of Tract 15902 These questions were addressed by the applicant as well as the engineer The homeowners seemed generally accepting of the development of single-family homes RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Revew DRC2001-00516 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB WM\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Resolution - Site Uti6zaUon Map - Phasing Plan -Site/Grading Plans - Elevations - Floor Plans -Day Creek Street Scene - Intenor Street Scene - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated December 18, 2001 - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated January 9, 2002 - Initial Study of Approval with Conditions for DRC2001-00516 C3 ~- ~E ~~ ~e, g 9 E~ ss ABI~ ~41~3 1~°rl Q ~ 'a~6 ~ ' 3~y~jr{x1444 ~~~ '~°II f ~ Oi~pEe~ 6.l= $ t~~ ~~fi y ~~~ x m y E+ s ~ =r lv N p~p ~ LL aaN 0 e COQ 0 v~~'y~ ~ Ii E ~3e~~~~ y E 2p'et ~ 1 F I~ N U ~=~tj:i aW~~~w of f"41~ N J Q a 4U ~~~~ ~.~ ~Irn¢~y i !I's; w 2 ~~a NRQQ $ F U • mme® ®us~s® dP7IDIf8~BmID ID~e m sma y.'v/mm am - ~IMfl9em mum m nooeaaeo® vowbaooo ooo~~ AbIXIP00~ OWO®10`84GMID® 4tlVB • GX1~bl~ `!~u C~ N ;~ 0&~~~g~Q~~ ~i ~; I aQi~ y J~ O h Y p Q N m ~~ 0. ~~ III ' ~~ N a ~ _ ~~~i ~ _Irra °V'' @• C l] „ b n ~ 4 = _~ftlL Z W'1aVl~~ ~1' ~' ` m ~.t1~ < W Q ~ i W m ~I ~_ ~..W.~ aUvg~ (A U ~ ~ F ~Xhibi} `'$~~ ~5 9 9 P b Q e Z a~ ;qq,",~ye9 ~ ~e ! dQ a ~y9si9i~ li ~ Q au c ~ Q 2 a fa~P~e,l . ZQ I IF /~` <~~Z (¢'f 3~OZ U gg A}s W^=~I~ ~~6~a9s1~~~~ :# WU~$~~ v -R !ae ~ ul 1A° e O ~19.~ Z Q ~jlml 7fi~~ ~~aA1 ~~~8 F ~ ~~1~ U ~ O afi~~ i.Igg IAcA ~ ~ ~; U .8~ __. ai -- -Y fig 6~ C ~i fs F .'f ___ h g ~~_ Qfi ___ ___ ~d 91 ~ 1 a~P-r% --~- fi ~ A~ f k' v u E' fi ~, 'i -I3 --- ~S ___ -_ d _' a ~. ~,.~ !~ e~ ie s '~ i yy '~ 6 i~~ ' ~, 1p ~ ~! °~ ~ .° ~i ,,G,~ ~xh`~ C~ -~i ~y s 1 ~6 ~~ ~~ 1 I I __; ~°`~~ l ~~ma \~~~~ I ~ BOb 1 _- ~ -T-~-__ -_`_-c =v~-_ _~~ ==y~ i~_ 9} a ~' =I ¢s z ,~ Z j JQ v ,. ~Z n.~ y UZ ~o ~. ~y ~ -~ ~,I~a Q~°icio V .~ ' v`~ I lu ' J f-U¢ W `-}if"a_ r~ P QQpza W ~ ~ ao~ bea ~ ~ I~` 7TQ¢¢ T ____ __ __ _-__ __ `~__~ ~ I ICI ~" ¢LLm fir- _ __-- ----_- - ~ I FFPP dU~.oZ ~ ____ "ava_ ___ ______ _ _ I I U2 ~a m - -_--- _- -____ _ - --- ~ OZ~ y~~ ~~. a I ~ I .i ~ yl o; y IIN I o I y~ II 1 I 1'~ ,°,~~ ~ ~- ~ I , IL 11, I y', ~ ~ ~~ II 1 I ~ it - ~p a; _ ws' 4Q Ily I ~ 9Q ° _ Illy ~~~ P~ ° ° ~ t bQ ly y ~II !5Q wii~ ° ~~ III+ kl l' S3 ~~~ ~I j yl I by ° 1} 'I I I I .z ap~ ~ ` ~, ICI Ik i I { iw=~a ° III Ii;j' } 1 a= II. fly - _ ~ Bpi! e III '°~,; _A---' !g- - - 9 nl wain f' _ "~.e I y ® , 11 1~ ! ~ i u ~~ 188100 ° `1eF !tl ° I I y I N ~ (s " \e~ ~ Z i~y~ - 9° _, ~~ fu e it lu II /, I _ \ POt ~ :~ ~ / ~ .!}! / ~ it I 1 ~ // ~ I °,~ i ~ - '~ ~~ \L N 11 N / i~ J/ _. MI y ~~ I ~ ~~~ ~ y I I~ 69 II ~~ I 1 ~~-~~ Y ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Y 1 A 1 ~~ ~ i I I I I VII f y I ~~ 1 ~ c. ~ " _ - ~ ~ -i _ 4A i `~ _ ~q\ ~ ~ /\ ~ q P b 5 !~ T p c N iti F ~a P_ .gs -- 1 i' __.- '~ i %~ /%%/ ~~ %/~ ~' i ~ i' ,\~ II d ~ ~ III 4~ 9a °f~[ ~'.~~ ~; ~/ U ~`! ~ ~ 1 ._ =~-t6 ~C~ G ~a===-- _ _-~~ e C I _ VNfA _-F_- ~ ( ~- II II i 9 ~C70SG7~®a~318lI I ~h III ' y I `•``~~~ aIBOP9.lLP9di / _ _ 16 u a ~ ~~ II II~ II II i ,. Q Z JQ a ~ ° oIZ a oQ"~a ~ ¢3~u~ U ~W~g4 ti ~I~LL~LLWW~ 2 W ~ OQ OQ ~~ U U K F~ . ' 1 a~~ s~-- -.-~ e s- ~ ~ ~ §~ f9 ~ P b ~_ ! I ~1 a a e ~ ~, ~ ~1~ - - 6 ge ~ ' ~~ S ,.-. ~ ip ,. ~ , ~ 'e.,.. ~ ~ b~ y ~ al a ~ ~I~EF -_---- ---_-_ ~ _ ~t~:i ~, _r~! ,~,8_-_ _ _~ ~ ~:j, ___- ~ • kith ~ bi ~ "1)" ~~ e= 9gg B ~ ge 3k@ ,2 °_,~E~~s ~ B~g9€EaE ~EBPi Cq u d t ® I I,~ 1 a y 0 E k~fk S W~ p' ~a~ 3'<Y 8 a G~ t$~ F 1~ Z- 0 z a a x i Y 3f Q Z Q 3 f W S U 2 Q .~,~.,. ASi .~, ~.~,. ~u ~; @~ =a e pE '~~ g~WW ~~pa:p.~~~~~ ~~@I~~EE~E'E~ ~ _ C I O a C ~~s «~S tl 8 ~-~ s i ~ -~:~ g~: G: ~~ o~ d~ Y 9e B a 0 z a 3 H W O I U Z Q ^ 1A BUNGALOW ~J L~ US•HOIYI@ WRAP-AROUND PORCH @ CORNER LOTS PLAN ONE RANCH O E T I W AND A ^•^••`• ~,~„`~"~ ^ X.rX cT... k l....~a.. m. ..w.X.. .... 1C COUNTRY 1D SANTA BARBARA 1. RgNT EEIf EIEWTpX 1B RANCH 1C RNWT !IG! FlIYAiNNI ,- I~ 111aY 1MC~M ou 3 .S~ ~a~ ~#~ ^~ R~3 ".4 o 3 e ;_ z b d . V Y e J~t9 J Q Q 3 f W . O x U Z \~ _Y-`\ V CY VVV1a1 rtT 11414 a tRl aTll l l p1g11 l ] /.T pItO1L [U SFNIN tlNNtlNMN l u rt loea b1gYL 0[Q .~ ~~, T +~.~ ~~ ` PLAN T W O RANCHO E T I W A N D A '~^'^ „n ,~, ~ Ms c.o., x e..ooia.. m< r.~.~.. ~...~ mwq n~ ma.~~w~Titcmom.~ ~NV~~s~~® ~wm l ~ .~ NNMffC! HLg1pM US•HOrTIQ WRAP-AROUND PORCH @ CORNER LOTS PLAN TWO R A N C~E T I W A N D A Mn°'•"°,,'~,~„'~°~ u..] c.... x •..o.~a.. m= ~e 2C COUNTRY 2D SANTA BARBARA 2A BUNGALOW 2B RANCH ]D WMt ~ ¢2gigM A~~d ~~~~~ 9~ 9 ~ ~ ~~`i5,5~ 2 ]icy F+f ~~~~9~d~s~~€ T 3 0 2 m C15 d s s 3 s W e a e I ~ I I i ~~ °r~ }}}~. ~Pyy r~$ yC ~~L 9 ~'-~ Jj~ S x a d V Y t i 1~ ~~ G ~ ffi i$ ~~ e gg ~~ Q O Z a 3 W 0 x U Z 6 'N c roi ~~~ " ~- - .... mot' s e e 1 a I i~ ~~, 4 ~6s C p~~ Y: .tee i ~ ~s w~Y q 4~~ is ~~4 cce 2 z S .~". r Z Q z 6 S r~ t ~£ 6 a 0 z a 3 0 x U 2 Q r1 ~~ v 6 s B #1- 5 s 'O z a ;, a z d1 }33 5 0 z a 3 w 0 U 2 ~~ ..~- ~M_ ~G~^ W p4 3 x~ a ~ g ~0 3 Y 3 d tl ~x`, ~r C ~g d c a ~~ ~~ y~~ 1C i•°. tl 8 d 6 9 I" ~~ Q u Q x J a U Z _~^ -_Y ! i OPTIONAL GARDEN WALL ELEVATIONS PLAN FOUR RANCHO E T I W A N D A r,w,~, R Wrk Gmu k beoclLLea Inc Asa.r~ ~r/a 16 OC COUNTRY CA BUNGALOW 4D SANTA BARBARA 4B RANCH ___~_at a ~~ ~~ x ~~ z a < 6 Q ~ e Y Q D g :~~ ~k: ~pi ~~ Q~ ~~ ".i I (~ 1uW ~ g`~¢ r~: ~~y ~~ >- Z- 6 ~ y 6 e V S C ~~ ~f Q 0 2 a 3 W O S U 2 Q W 1 1 S ~' 1= n~n l 7~ rr---- _„ n ~ II Opt II II Covered Deck II I II SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1500 sq fl 4 OPTIONAL BEDROOM 5 + 187 sq (t OPTIONAL DEN + 188 sq ft RANCHO ETIW ANDA f` J, `J I+ 4~ I ~ I FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1303 sq ft total 2803 sq (t PLAN ONE WrY Craaa k •aaocutea Inc tua t n' +t it ~CmeOred Desk II II II 1 Bedroom 5 pen to below •• •• • ~• P N Bonus Room OPTIONAL BEDROOM 5 + 187 sq.tt Farmly Roam ~.fa.a ns+ w Yr. Be~oom 4 / Opt Den Ba 3 3-Car Garage I~ 1~-__--_ y 50'-0' DhYng Room -l Livmg Room ~ I •. •.. ,.~ - ~ t r Porch I ~l m wku..w•o rw+o+i ray cwa ~ma Den I I. Ynl eq•g1 wu mm 1 FGtST FLOOR PLAN 1483 s4 tt totaF 2983 sq. i[ RANCHO ETIW ANDA +~ - r~ ---+i I 1 I I I~ I PLAN TWO Wrk Gran k .1uac1•lo Inc •rr• •ry6 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1500 sq ft Tt _~1 BEDROOM 4 OPTION RANCHO ETIWANDA J YI -~y fi ~y FIRST FLOOR PLAN 7333 sq ft total 2960 sq (1 PLAN THREE Mvk Groes k Aseocl rtes Ine •Yw ICI Y r------~ Opt Deck Tandem Space Dining Room ....r Porch 3-Car Gaage Courtyard Fa~Mly Room i I Living Room ~.. o-x it Oa 3 Bedroom S/ Opt Office ar.n: a. w.. r..... a. I ~r___~i i_ ~ 1 SO'-0" FRST FLOOR PLAN 1720 sq it torah 3282 sq. ft US'HO~I'1B PLAN F O U R RANCHO ETIWANDA ,,,,~,~, •~ w.k c....e....a.~.. m. .a - SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1562 sq it A1___ --___- rt the Jh II DPt II L Covered Derk II 3 Car Garage -_-_ { It ~-._ SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1949 sq f t RANCHO ETIW ANDA i ~w. ~.+ ±± ________11 I I I I L-_,-----., FamBy Room Bedroom 5 II T ~' 11 ~ Dlmng Room ~ Uving Room Porch FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1554 sq ft total 3503 sq ft PLAN FIVE Nark Groa k bwcplo Inc _ tiM i " LOFT AND BEDROOM 6 W /BATH 4 OPTION ~. L. T ._ "1'1 ~..y.~u DAY GRCCK BOULCVARD CLCVATION (LOOICMl Y1lGT AT TRAGTO 144~4~ 14~]O) RANCHO HTIWANDA, CALIFORNIA •~~~_' i ~iflCHIIfHNi~ ~.°l:m ~S~-•v knr;~ r~_ .y iN ~ _ a A Ig 1 ~I i • chi bid ~'G'' ag . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:40 p.m. Emily Wimer December 18, 2001 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for three previousty approved tentative trail maps consisting of 113 single-famiy lots in the Low Residential District (211 dwelling units per acre) of the Etrvvanda North Specific Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located on Day Creek Boulevard on the north and south sides of Banyan Street - APN: 225-101114 UCP/RANCHO ETIWANDA. Related file: TT14523-1,14494, and 15902. Desion Parameters: The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously University/Crest Project), a 1,238 residential unit development approved by the County in May 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The site consists of 7 Tracts, which are all currently being rough graded. The applicant is proposing a total of 8 phases. The site is bordered by a portion of Tract 14523 to the north, Banyan Street to the south, and Tract 13812 to the east Portions of the proposed development run along both sides of Day Creek Boulevard. Main access to the tracts is from Day Creek Boulevard. _ The applicant is proposing to develop 113 single-family homes on three tracts approved under the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Agreement (Tract 14494,14523 and 15902). The homes will include 10 Floor Plans and 5 architectural styles. The square footage of the homes range in size from 2,803 to 3,503. The styles include Ranch, Country, and Bungalow, as primary architectural style and Monterey and Santa Barbara as secondary styles. The primary styles will consist of seventy percent of the total home product The homes will also include porches on comer lots, side on garages, and additional enhanced architecture on elevations, which bads and side on Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street The project will be built in 8 phases. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve major design issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time pennittrng, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The size of the lumber used for the Bungalow style pilasters should be sizeable and cohesive with the pilaster size. 2. Twenty five percent of the porches should be considered "standard" to coindde with the rural architectural theme of Rancho Etrwanda. 3. Thirty peroent of garage doors should have windows. This wilt allow variety of 3 car garage elevations. 4. When a retaining wall exists in the rear of the property to assist with the 15-foot useable area, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope. 5. The pilasters used forthe Bungalow style architecture should widen at the bottom for a more `,~,~ rural and traditronal look. ~ ~~ ~1C-`t ~ l~~ ti DRC COMMENTS . DR DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES December 18, 2001 Page 2 6. Provide an optional window or similar type of relief on the rear elevation of Plan 3. 7. Chimneys should have architectural detail, including bndc, stone, or siding as shown in the adopted architectural guidelines for Rancho Etiwanda. Adding stone to the Bungalow style would incorporate rock into all 4 elevations, see attached. 8. The left and right elevations of Santa Barbara style should incorporate additional trim, stucco, or fascia to incorporate 360-degree architecture. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. All walls visible from or facing a street should be decorative masonry on both sides. 2. All interior pnvate yard slopes required to be landscaped should receive ground cover, shrubs and one tree for every 150 square feet of area. A retio of fifty percent 5-gallon and 50 percent 15-gallon shall be provided for trees. 3. All river rock should be authentic and not veneer. 4. Plot one tree in each front yard area on Landscape Plan. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the project subiect to the above-mentioned conditions. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Emily Wimer The Committee recommended the applicant incorporate the following: 1. The size of the lumber used for the Bungalow style pilasters should be sizeable and cohesive Hnth the pilaster size. 2. Twenty-five percent of the porches should be considered "standard" to coincide with the rural architectural theme of Rancho Etrvvanda. 3. Thirty percent of garage doors should have windows. This will allow variety of mar garage elevations. 4. When a retaining wall exists in the rear of the properly to assist with the 15- foot useable area, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope. 5. The pilasters used for the Bungalow style architecture should Hnden at the bottom for a more rural and traditional look. C3o DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES December 18, 2001 Page 3 6. Provide an optional window or similar type of relief on the rear elevations of Plan 3. 7. Chimneys should have architectural detail, including brick, stone, or siding as shown in the adopted architectural guidelines for Rancho Etiwanda. Adding stone to the Bungalow style would incorporate rock into all 4 elevations. ,_ _ _ 8. The left and right elevations of Santa Barbara style should incorporate additional trim, stucco, or fascia to incorporate 360-degree architecture. 9. Interior return walls and comer side walls shall be stucco to match individual home colors. All walls shall have a cap incorporated into their design. n U C31 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6 45 p m Emily Wimer January 9, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for three previously approved tentative tract maps consisting of 113 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located on Day Creek Boulevard on the north and south sides of Banyan Street - APN 225-101-44 UCP/RANCHO ETIWANDA Related file TT14523-1, 14494, and 15902 Background On December 18, 2001, the Design Review Committee reviewed the protect and recommended the applicant to make revisions and come back for a specal meeting on January 9, 2002 Because of the short notice, the applicant will bring a revised set of plans to the meeting The Design Review Committee held a special meeting to review the revisions The following are issues that should be addressed at the meeting Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the protect subject to the above mentioned comments Design Review Committee Action Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Emily Wimer The applicant showed the revised elevations at the meeting that addressed the above identifying issues The Committee reviewed the issues and recommended approval subiect to staffs comments and the following conditions• 1 Architectural upgrades for the Santa Barbara style shall be standard throughout the tract 2 Interior return walls and comer sidewalls shall be stuccoed to match individual home colors All walls shall have a cap incorporated into their design 3 When a retaining wall exists in the rear of the property to assist with the 15- foot useable area, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope 4 A minimum of 30 percent of garage doors shall have window treatments 5 Chimney enhancements shall be standard on all floor plans that provide a chimney All garage rear wall shall provide windows as standard throughout the tract ~~-~ bid `' ~,, C3a l_.J • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Development Review DRC2001-00516 2. Related Files: Tract 15902, 14523, and Tract 14494 3. Description of Project: The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for two full and one partial previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 113 single family lots on 32 9 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located north of Banyan Street, east and west of Day Creek Boulevard -APN~ 225-101-44. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: US Homes 181 Old Spnngs Road Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential 6. Zoning: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre), Etiwanda North Speafic Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development within the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan (previously the Urnversity Planned Development), a 715 residential unit protect originally approved as part of the University/Crest Planned Development by the County in May 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga The site is a portion of 3 tracts currently being rough graded in the Planned Development The site is bordered by vacant land (proposed residential development) to the north and south To the east is single-family development, and to the west of the site is the Day Creek Flood Control Channel. The site is approximately 1,000 feet north of the newly constructed Route 30 Freeway Access to the site is from Day Creek Boulevard 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None ~xµ~air "5" C33 Initial Study for Development Rewew DRC2001-00689 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed protect could have a sign cant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect m this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, inGuding revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect Signed Emily Wi er Assistan Planner December 12, 2001 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed m an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this initial Study and are available for rewew in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (X) Environmental Impact Report for University/Crest Planned Development (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) (Certified June 1991) (X) Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Revised University protect (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) (Certified October 26, 1999) l~ T • RESOLUTION NO 02-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00516, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 113 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS FOR TENTATIVE TRACTS 14494, 14523, AND 15902 ON 32 9 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-101-44 A Recitals 1 US Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00516, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 23rd day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on January 23, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street with a street frontage of 985 4 feet along the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and 803 feet along the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, and is presently vacant, and b The properties to the north, south, and west of the subject site are vacant The property to the east is the future park site, and The property has been rough graded, and The project consists of Tracts 14494, 14523, and 15902, and e The project falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows C~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-16 DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES January 23, 2002 Page 2 a The proposed pro/ect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accordance with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in/unous to properties or improvements in the wcirnty 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bemardmo as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the County of San Bemardmo Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the University/Crest Planned Development In August of 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would require a ma/or revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report Based upon the facts and information contained in the certified Environmental Impact Report, together with all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the pro/ect will have a significant effect upon the environment a There have not been substantial changes in the protect that require mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the seventy of the previously identified significant effects b There have not been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified significant effects c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exeroise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the probed will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or altematives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the protect but the pro/ed proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altemative, or 4) mitigation measures or altematives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altemative 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subbed to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference C 3l0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-16 DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES January 23, 2002 Page 3 Plannrna Diwsion 1) Where slope conditions regwre retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, prowde a logical transition to allow access onto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, pnorto issuance of grading permits 2) Provide a 3-foot minimum landscape area between back of the sidewalk and a 6-foot block wall on all comer side lots 3) Reduce the property Ime walls/fences between lots to a maximum of 7 feet m height Where combination walls ewst, limit the retaining walls to a maxmum of 2 feet m height 4) Provide finish, color, and tram cap on return walls with color to match home product Final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, pnorto issuance of pernits Engmeenng Division 1) Development Review DRC2001-00516 shall complywnth all conditions of Tentative Tracts 14523-1 and 14494-1, 15902 and Development Agreement No. 00-02 the City of Rancho Cucamonga U C P , Incorporated, dated November 29, 2000, CO 00-088 for Rancho Etrwanda and the revised University Protect The conditions of approval of the Tentative Maps shall be completed lomtly with the general ongoing and speufic conddions as noted m the Development Agreement 2) Wntten notice shall be regwred from other City Divisions, i e ,Planning, Fire Safety, Bwldmg and Safety, and the County of San Bemardmo, that all of their respective regwrements have been or wall be complied with, pnor to recording of each final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first 3) The improvement plans for the off-site streets, store drams, and Landscaped Maintenance Distract infrastructure shall be approved and an agreement and bonds in-place guaranteeing their construction by the master developer, Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC, pnorto approval of the final maps or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first 4) The street and store dram improvements for the adjacent and southerly Tentative Tract 14523-1 (US Homes) shall be coordinated and constructed concurrently with those of Tentative Tracts 14495 and 14523 (MBK Homes, DRC2001-00514) If DRC2001-00514 improvements are not constructed concurrently wrath those of Trail Map 14523-1, a drainage acceptance agreement from the southerly property owner is regwred for any resulting stone water runoff C3~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-16 DRC2001-00516 - US HOMES January 23, 2002 Page 4 generated by this pro/ect The drainage acceptance agreement shall be in-place, poor to the issuance of any construction permits 5) Final grease Grading Plans shall be consistent v~nth approved Landscape Maintenance Distnct Plans Environmental Mdwation 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, as certified by the County of San Bernardino, and Initial Study/Addendum as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Lary T McNiel, Chairnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS r-~ C38 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00516 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR TT14494, 14523, AND 15902 FOR 113 LOTS APPLICANT: US HOMES LOCATION: NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included m legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and vngation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conddional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expve if bwldmg permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement C3q SC-11-01 1 Comolehon Date -~-~- _~-~ _~_~ -~-~- Protect N o ORC2001-00516 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the pro/eGt site or busyness activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner _ _ 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / / State Fve Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection District and the Budding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building perrntts 5. All site, grading, landscape, tmtgation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ _ building, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, _/_/ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ Ume of bwldmg permd issuance 7 AC condensers shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a / / combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landsceping to the satisfaction of the _ _ _ City Planner 8 Street names shall be submttted for City Planner review and approval to accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map _ _ _ 9 All bulding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination • 10 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions _ _ and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property / / owner, homeowners' assocation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape _ _ _ maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 12 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / ! lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ _ requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall / / condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining _ _ _ property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 14 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each _/_/_ support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two %inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed to an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 15 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant / / SC-11-01 C~ 2 _ Protect N o DRC2001-00516 Comolehon Date 16 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to _/ / maintain an open feeling and enhance views _ _ 17 On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk / / 18 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry The / / color shall be to the satisfaction of the Ctty Planner _ _ 19 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured / / products _ _ _ D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / / protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and _ _ _ streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_!_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more to vertical hetght and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in verticel hetght and of 2 1 or greater _/_/ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as _ follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq k of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet to vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted to staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single family residential development, all slope planting and imgation shall be continuously _! / maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold _ _ and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irigation shall be required per the Development / / Code and/or the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement Thts requirement shall be in _ _ _ addition to the required street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included _/_/ in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval and _ coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Dtwsion 7 Landsceping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ ~ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer C~ SC-11-01 Protect N o DRC2001-00516 Comolehon Date 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division _ 9 Landscaping and imgation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code F. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock / / Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash _ _ _ deposit on any property 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Speaal / / Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior _ _ _ to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway protect _/_/ in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any _ property 4 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the _/_/_ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bulding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bulding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 5 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit 6 In those instances regwring long term monitoring (i e) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the _/_/_ applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented G. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/ /_ of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for _ mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/~ a Site/Plot Plan, c~a SC-11-01 4 Protect No DRC2001-00516 Comolehon Date b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and au condihontng, and g Planning Drvtsion Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation celculattons, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are required for fenang and/or walls 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance I. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the pro/ect fife number (t a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest • adapted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requvements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Bwldmg and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to tssuance of bwlding permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or motor addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division pnor to permit tssuance J. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Budding Code far regwred occupancy separation(s) 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions K. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Unform Budding Cade, Ctty Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan .2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work SC-11-01 C43 5 -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- /_/_ -/-/- -/ ~- -/-/. -/-/- Protect No DRC2001-00516 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from sVeet centerline) 42 to 62 total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard 40 total feet on Banvan Street 2 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings Day Creek Boulevard and Banvan Street 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City M. Street Improvements 1 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr lights Trees Trail Island Trail Da Creek Boulevard x x x x x x x x d Ban an Street x x x x x x x d Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined dunng plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for all improvements in the form of an improvement agreement and bonds by Rancho Etiwanda 885 LLC the Master Development 2 Improvement Plans and ConsWction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing wmpletion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer SC-11-01 Cs I Comoletlon Date -/-/ -/-/- /_/ / / / / /_/. /_/. /_/, / / • -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- Protect No DRC2001-00516 Completion Date d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new constructton or reconstruction / / protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and _ _ _ Interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-Inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specfied e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all comers of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times wdh _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to Ctty Standards, except for single family residential lots _ _ _ h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ 3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Ctty Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program 4 All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete pnor to the / /_ issuance of budding permits See Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement _ _ N. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall _/ /_ be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval pnor to final map approval or issuance _ of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District No 10 Infrastructure Streets 2 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / / developer until accepted by the City _ _ 3 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / / Beautification Master Plan Day Creek Boulevard _ _ _ O. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer pnor to final map / / approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall _ _ _ be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the / / property from adtacent areas _ _ _ 3 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is regwred for work within its / / ~ nght-of-way _ _ _ SC-11-01 C~-~ 7 Project N o DRC2001.00516 Completion Dete 4 Trees are prohibited wRhin 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/~ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk ~ 5 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a ~~ sump catch basin on the public street P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/~_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utildy Standards. Easements shall be provided as requred 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/~ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the ~~_ Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract, and the Environmental HeaRh Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs fast Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or pnor to the issuance of permds in the case of all other residential protects. 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved ~~_ Approval of the final parcel map wtll be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way. ~_/ Metropolitan Water District (MWP). 2 Anon-refundable deposR shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~~_ new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed ~~_ beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: See attached Fve conditions SC-17-01 CL LI 8 '.~.' FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ ,~~~~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0512 (FD-01-0512-A DR Comments) PROJECT #: DRC2001-00516 (Tract 14523-1 14494 and 15630) PROJECT NAME: U.S. Homes DATE: December 19, 2001 PLAN TYPE: SFR 113 lots APPLICANT NAME: UCP, Inc OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Deveseon 3 FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION: V-N LOCATION: Day Creek North and South of Banyan FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locate, Flre Protecteon Planning Specealest PLANNER: Emely Wemer ALL OF THE FOLL OWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The Technecal Reveew es normally the second stage en the Development Reveew process involving Fere Destnct reveew The followeng conditions of approval were identefeed in the enetial protect review and have not been addressed by the applicant Although we have tried, not all Fire District requvements for the proposed protect may be included Additions to or changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for reveew "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Division to obtain Fere District approval If your protect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fve District conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Community Facitrties Distracts 2 Required Note: The protect is located within a "Mello-Roos" Community Facilities Destnct for fire protection services 3 Required Note. Please provide proof that the protect has been annexed into the Fire Protection Community Facilities District This information is usually found in your Title report B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the reveew and approval by the Fere Destnct and the Water District. C4~`7 2 Pnor to the issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract standards. Contac the Fve Safety Division for a copy of "Fire Distract Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 3 When any portion of a faality or bulding is located more than 150-feet from a fve hydrant located on' public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 4 Required Note: The requved fve flow for this protect shall be 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes one fire hydrant is regwred per 1000 gallons of regwred fire flow NOTE If recuved fire flow cannot be orovded for the oroiect all structures Fire District 5 Required Note: The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fve Code Appendix III-B, as amended. 6 Public fve hydrants located with a 500-foot radius of the proposed may be used to prowde the requved fire flow subtect to Fire District rewew and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to prowde required fve flow 7 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall rnspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Diviswn 8 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bulder/developer m the presence of the Water Distract or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 9 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for rewew and approval Include main size 10 Required Note Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a bl~ reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City oT Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers ° On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. Water Avadabihty 1 Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall prowde evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availabdrtv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. If suffiaent water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be regwred m each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow D. Fire Access Roadways and Fire Lanes- Required Note: Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets and courts from the Fire Distract in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise regwred Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modrficahons in fire lanes or access roadways without pnor wntten approval of the Fire Distract, Fire Safety Division 2 Dead-end Fire District Access Roadways Requred Note: Dead-end Fire Distract access roadw excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the fuming around of fue apparatus may include a cut-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fve District Required Note Prior to the issuance of any grading pennrts, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fire Distract access roadways/driveways C'~ 4 Required Note Gated or restricted access for all residential development requires the installation of a Knox rapid entry system. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire D~sttict key switch In addition all automatic gates . shall be provided with a Fve District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device Contact the Fire Protection Planning Speaalist at (909) 477-2770, extension 3009 for specrfic details and ordering information 5 Required Note The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fve sprinkler systems This condition applies when the Fve District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or delaying response exists 6 Required Note: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 7 Required Note Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fve District Standards 6 Required Note: Each phase of a development must comply with Fve District access roadway requirements. The Fire Distract will not accept roadways that will rely on future construction to provide access roadways to meet minimum standard. All structures located on dead-end or substandard access roadways shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed in accordance with the applicable standard. 9 Required Note- Single-family Residential Dead-end roadways shall not exceed 600 feet in length measured from the vertical plane of the curb on the cross street to the curb line at the top of the cul-de-sac 10. Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bwlding pertnrt, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire Disfict for fire lanes on regwred Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fre District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes° standard 11 New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, adddional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry E. Hazardous Fve Area 1 Required Note Hazardous Fre Area Development- Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall meet all requrements for development and construction within the Hillside District, the Very High Fre Hazard Seventy Zone (VHFHSZ), and the State Responsibility Area (SRA) This may include increased street widths, on-sde water supplies, fre-resistive construction, Class A roof assemblies, fve sprinklers, etc , contained in the Fire Safety Overlay Distract Standards F. Fuel ModrficationMazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for All Maps and Plans) 1 This protect is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" based on proximity to or exposure urban -wildland interface Mitigation measures are regwred The bwlding(s) shall be constructed in accordance with the standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay District- Area FR-1 or Area FR-2 2 Landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Fre Safety Division for review of proposed vegetation All groundcover, shrubs, plants, and trees are regwred to be fve-resistive in accordance with published references The plant palette shall include the common name for all vegetation The landscaping plan shall identify all native speaes proposed for retention 3 Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading or bwlding permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modif~cation/hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an indmdual or fain qualrfied and experienced in wildfire hazard mitigation planning 4 Prior to the issuance of any precise grading or bwlding permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modrfication/hazard reduction plan and program. The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures by vegetation c(-I-q 5 Pnor to the issuance of a bwlding permrf or Certrficate of Occupancy, the developer shall have completed, m cooperation with the Fire Distract, that portion of the approved fuel modrfication/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fve Distract before the introduction of any combustible materials into the protect area Approval is subject to final on-sde inspection 6. Pnor to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modrfication/hazard reduct~ plan shall be installed The Fire Distract shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modfication areas Further, the installed fuel modfication plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire District The CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subject to (annual) trienrnal inspections 7. Phased protects or temporary fuel modrficabon plans must meet the requirements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire Distract 8 For asingle-family dwelling protect located in the Hazardous Fue Area, a simplrfied landscaping/fuel modrfication plan may be acceptable The plan shall detail the minimum thirty (30) foot minimum defensible space and proposed and/or existing vegetation. The Fire District can provide a single page sheet of standardized notes for inclusion on the construction plans Call (909) 477-2770 to obtain a copy, and to determine rf your protect ~s eligible G. Combusbble Construction Letter 1. Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the alhweather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. H. Architectural Bwlding Plans t. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submd plans for the review and approval of the Distract Call the Fue Construcbon Services Und at (909) 477-2713 for any required notes to be placed on plans pnor to submdtal I. Fue D~stnct Service Fees' 1 The following fees may be applicable to this project and are being identified at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs. Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required Installations subject to approval by the Fire District The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the trine plans submitted. When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division' " $66 Preliminary Vegetation ManagemenUFuel Modification Plan (Includes SFR In-fill lots) $66 Final Vegetation Management/Fuel Modfication Plan and Inspection (Subdivision) $132 Single-family Dwelling Review- Hazardous Fire Area $t32 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fve Protection " Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fue Safety Droision ` Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fve Construction Services and for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire spnnklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews upon submdtal of plans ~ 2 The following service fees are due to the Fire District and payable at this time: $132 for Single-family Residential Development $132 -Total due at this time. Remk payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucemonoa Fire District" ~~ " Plus a microficheAaser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division 'Note: Separate plan check fees wdl be assessed by the Fve Construction Services and for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fve extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submdtal of plans .1. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1. Plans shall be submdted and approved prior to construction rn accordance wdh 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electncal and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards. NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submdtal of plans. Fire Distract Conddions of Approval- Template SL 10/24/01 Revision • • l~ I - T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO UCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 23, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY• Klrt A Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 26 7 acres of land Into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential Dlstnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etlwanda South Overlay Dlstnct, and Etlwanda Avenue Overlay Dlstnct within the Etlwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etlwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration (Continued from January 9, 2002) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001- 00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land In the Medwm Resldentlal Dlstnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etlwanda South Overlay Distract, and Etlwanda Avenue Overlay Dlstnct within the Etlwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etlwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Related files• Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001- 00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from January 9, 2002) BACKGROUND The proposed project was continued from the January 9, 2002, Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant an opportunity to conduct a second public neighborhood meeting on January 17, 2002, (the original neighborhood meeting was held on November 20, 2001) with the adtacent property owners to address Identified Issues and concerns noted to date The continuance was requested by both the applicant and the surrounding residents. Attached are letters of correspondence received to date regarding issues and concerns relating to the proposed project (Exhibit "A") Additionally, attached is a letter dated January 17, 2002, by the applicant 'Forecast Homes' noting an amendment to the project to delete the 2.5-acre parcel fronting Etlwanda Avenue (APN 227-211-17) from the application (Exhibit "B") Removal of this parcel will eliminate two buildings (one Building Type B, and one Building Type C) resulting Ina reduction of ITEMS D & E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT 16257 AND DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST HOMES January 23, 2002 Page 2 26 apartment units from the proposed protect revised total number of apartments is 342 units 23, 2002, Planning Commission Meeting The revised protect area is 24.2 acres and the Revised plans will be provided at the January ANALYSIS. In their January 9 letter, Mr. Don Glover (7954 Etiwanda) and Mr. Joe Rusting (12837 Chervil Street) request that additional conditions of approval be imposed to address 10 issues. Staff believes that the deletion of the 2 5-acre parcel from the proposed protect resolves many of these Issues. 1. Utilities to Glover and Rusting Lots -The residents believe they have utility easement and possibly prescnpUve nghts for certain utilities lines, however, no copies of the alleged easements or legal documents establishing prescnptive nghts have been submitted With the deletion of the 2 5-acre parcel, the proposed project ~nnll not alter any existing utilities serving the surrounding residents No condition is recommended. 2 Access to Sidewalks -The protect is proposed to be developed under the Optional Development Standards (Figure 5-3) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which requires one 10-20 foot wide continuous on-site greenway easement across the protect site for the express purpose to "link pnvate common areas with public areas, such as streets or community trails" and to "provide connections to existing or planned greenways located on adiacent property." There are numerous sidewalk connections through the proposed protect. Although there are no existing greenways on surrounding properties, it is reasonable to assume that development of the surrounding properties at a similar density would also regwre a greenway A condition of approval has been added to the resolution 3 Easement on Entry Road and Streets "A" and "B" - Wdh the deletion of the 2 5 acre parcel, which contains the existing access easement for Mr Glover, the proposed protect will not alter the existing access via dirt roads to either parcel. Mr. Rusling's lot takes access from Chervil Street, which is a pnvate street that is not being altered by this development No condtion is recommended 4 Elimination of Masonry Barriers Along Streets "A" and "B" -The residents want the block wall changed to a wrought iron fence A condition of approval has been added to the resolution 5 Access Easements Along Streets "A" and "B" -Same as #3 6 Electric Gates Eliminated -The proposed protect is a gated development. Again, with the deletion of the 2 5 acre parcel, which contains the existing access easement for Mr Glover, the proposed project will not alter the existing access via dirt roads to either parcel Mr Rusling's lot takes access from Chervil Street, which is a pnvate street that is not being altered by this development No condition is recommended 7 Landscape Screening -Residents desire "heavy landscape screening" around their lots for pnvacy The protect design includes the desired extensive landscaping, in particular trees Per the City's standards, the protect is regwred to plant 45 trees per gross acre, including 20 percent in large "box" sizes This condition was already recommended as Planning Dmsion Standard Condition F 2 in the CUP resolution. ~~~ a • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT 16257 AND DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST HOMES January 23, 2002 Page 3 8 Construction Access -Residents desire construction access through the proposed project in the future See #3. 9 Existing Utilities for Single Family Homes -Same as #1 Residents want this developer to connect their existing homes to his utility and telephone system Again, with the deletion of the 2 5 acre parcel, the proposed project will not alter existing utility service to the existing homes No condition is recommended. 10. Trash & Mail Relocation -Residents want easement for trash and pick-up. Again, with the deletion of the 2 5-acre parcel, the proposed project will not alter existing trash or mail access No condition is recommended. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of the project through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB KCgc Attachments Exhibit "A" -Letters of Correspondence Exhibit "B" -Letter from Forecast Homes dated January 17, 2002 Exhibit "C" -Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 9, 2002 Draft Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT16257 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 ~c ~~ TO• Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Don Glover 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga `~t t Y Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA JqN 03 2i7pj RECEIVEp . p~ANN/NG ice Rusting 12837 Chervil Street, Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments -Impact On Our Homestead Properties January 2, 2002 Dear Sir: three sides by the propos d Etwanda ApartrnenPs, alprojsct by Forecast Hotnesn toe Rustling's property is lot 22 (approximately 2 acres) and Don Glover's property is lot 23 (approximately ri acres) as shown on the attached County Assessor's Map. Also note the proposed Etiwanda Apartments development shown on the map. We were invited, along with other neighbors, to a meeting held by Forecast Homes f we h d lany questions r Wa v~e frankly shockeds We expressed our concems~d about access to our properties, how we would get water b gas from Etiwanda Avenue to our properties and expressed our general concern abo~ acf the ro osed foot high wall towering over our properties along the property ~ P p development additionally, there was also nothing in the plans that indicated what the impact would be of surface water drainage on or over our properties from the proposed development. Although the plans showed some form of access to our properties, the developer questioned our right to a county easement to our properttes, stating that the access outr peoperltiesaswhilenthe projecthwas being developedn of how we would All in all, the meeting gave us no assurances that our properties would not be adversely affected. Additionally, the city representative that was present said very I~ttle and did not advise us about our rights. ' _ the near meeting we had was on December 27, 2001 with the developer. We ' ' (Glover fl Rustbng) were there along with four of the six property owners along Chervil Street, It quickly became apparent that the sole purpose of the meeting was for Forecast to buy us out. However, rn ovr opinion, Forecast was looking to buy our properties at below market value. Don Glover asked the developer for land sale comparables, bvt the developer said it was not relevant. We have subsequently received a letter from City Hall that there will be a Planning t3oard meeting on January 9, 2002 in regard to the approval of the protect. Frankly, this was a great surprise to us. ~ We were surprised that it has gotten this far without any input from us, the people p owded usewith the~nformafion necessary for uos to rerspondty have adequately i So, we request that you postpone any deliberation in regard to Etiwanda Gardens on your scheduled /anusry 9, 2002 meeting Also, in order for us to adequately evaluate the impact on our houses, we request that you provide us with the following information needed by our planning consultant. 1. The complete submittal set for Etiwanda Gardens, including all conceptual grading and utility plans. 2. A copy of the city's negative declaration in regard to the project. 3. Forecast's application and all staff reports in regard to the property 4. if available, transcripts of design review meetings between Forecast and the city. We believe the negative declaration on this project was premature and that the city did not provide us with the information needed to respond The city of Rancho Cucamonga has a reputation for respecting the property rights of all property owners, not just big developers. Don Glover's family has owned its land ' for over 100 years and Joe Rusting has also been a long time resident, Again, we request that this project not go forward until we are adequately and fairly informed and that we have an adequate and fair opportunity to respond. We need assurances from the city that our property rights wtll be protected through conditions placed on this development, If It is approved. As a first step, we look forward to meeting with you and being provided with the above requested information. Please call Don Glover at 909-226-9465 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~ ~ ~~ ~ , Don Glover oe Rusling / tL J ~~. ~ 5 ~ ' ,. ~ ~ I $ i' ~i ~~~ a ,~ ' ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~¢ sAY ~kr ~ ~ ~ ro~ .i ~ ` .t ~ + .f i I I ~ ' ~_ ~ro~ ~~^q i ~ID y~l rw M a ~;~,:,~' ~'' '~,~1~{Z- , ~/~'' a Z. awn N fi A It:/~ i ~i ~ y I a. - - -- ~' ~,~~ ,~ ®._ ~ ~~ ~ -~ ' r „~ ^ ~ ~~ Q ~ `• ~ ~ ro j ~~~~ N ea;i ~g~k---- Oratr; EXP•r?$0%038JS7 Descirp;,on ?27.21 fags I of Z Comment ~~ ~~ i ., ~ . I~ ~: R ~f. ~~ • M~ To: FROM: Si1BJECT: January 6, 2002 Bred Buller, City Phmner City of Rancho Cucamonga Lourdes 8c Erick Titgueros 1072111'dlside Road, Alta Loma (fail Tims 128~tervil Strtd, Rancho Cucammga I)eaielSeadoval & Juanita Sandoval 12820 Chervil Street, Rancho Cucammga GNP GUGPMONGP N G\~ ~F RP PN ~~ 2OO'L LNG N PN RE~~\~~O _ pL On the County of San Bernardino Assessor's Map, Book 227, Page 21 please sce the properties that we are cmcaned about. Lourdes end Erick Tirgueros are the Property Owners of Lot # 32 and Lot #33. Gail Tims is the Property Owner of Ld #34. Daniel Sandoval and Juanita Sandoval are the Property Owners of Lot #35. Etiwanda Apartments - Lnpad On Our Homestead Properties Dear Sir: We are a omarned community of home owners who ere seeking to postpme the public herring m January 9th to allow us adequate time to research and present our concsrns to the city. First of all, two of the above mentimed property owners were not informed of this meeting until Daniel Sandoval the other properly owner personally centacted them. This meeting came es quite a shock to them since they were not prepared to respond. As a cammrmity we have disrvssed the impact that this development would have m our community. If the Etiwanda Gardens Apartments were to be developed around our properties these issues would need to be addressed and evenurally resolved. • Ads of grime would be mare likely to ooa>r due to the Inereased Popuhrtim that would rewrh from this development, regardless ofthe "upscale" desigratim ofdresa apartment buildings. (As mns~rlted by m experienced Police Offiar this is a lmown fad.) • Property Devaluatim would most h7rely exec or stagnate before, during and afar this development This would adversely abed the investments of Urese property owners. • Difficulty to Lnprave this community would resuk if the Mack wall proposed by the develo~ent were to be put in place before property owners have time to researdr making the following improvements: / Residential Paved Road with sidewalks to improve access to these properties and prevent erosim of existing road. / Drainage rarte from properties would be limited by proposed block wall without adequate P~DII1O8 ~ ro-routing. / hrstallatim of a sews system in the future may nd be possible a8a surramding development is completed. / Upgrade of water lines and public utilities 6or these properties may nd be possible a1Der surramding development is camplded[ r~ ~~ G .. .t ./ Aesthetic issues sudt as, lass of mountain view, rural nature of the surramdiog property. and increased noise and traffic due m the apartment development d l.,onstrtrdien of a block wall around out properties, agpocielly along the existing dirt road should the develops choose m purchase Lot #22 and Lot #231eavmg the other properties, would limit the ability for vehicles m tun errand en our road, would result m a potential fire 6arard should firture moatructim en our road be required since there would be no access by fire trucks m our properties As property owners we feel 1&e our concerns have not been given the faun m be addressed and resolved. All meetings m this point with the developers err the city have been primarily 5x:usad en intarmiug us what is planned m go in arormd us rather than seriously considering our canoema We have attempted m point au same of our cencans but m our knowledge these issues have nd been fixmally recorded nor given any attention towards resolving these potential problems that could result due m the development being started before we could take any actin. We respactfirlly request that the scheduled public hearing be postponed until we have ban given adequate time and canal m Formally address, research, and eventually resolve our oenmns. According m the Notice of public I-Iearing received by the Sandoval's the final statement alarms us m the passibility that only those issues raised at the public hearing would be subjcd m challenge m e court of law. Sine , Lou'rd/e~s & Enrick Ti s ~l/ a ~I ~~~~~ Daniel & Juanita Smdoval Also in cmoernm®t with the above niisad need m postpoce the public hearingim~rall~ogw time and canal sing then terns are property awmers of Lot 112~\~_i ~ _, Dan dlover. 7 nalin¢ Dab (ilwer £. - TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga Don Glover 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Joe Rusling 12837 Chevil Street, Rancho Cucamonga ci~y p'~R '~Ncy Oc RFpF/~~~ ~,9ZO UC~'~piyGq Fp QZ A Etiwanda Apartments -Additional Conditions of Approval (~NN~NG January 9, 2002 Dear Members of the City Planning Commission: We are the homeowners on lots 22 (Rusling) and 23 (Glover) that will be surrounded on three sides by the above referenced project. Detailed plans and related staff reports were not made available to us until January 8, 2002, just one day before this meeting. We were not notified about or inwted to any design rewew or technical review committee hearings. The only official city meeting that occurred was on November 20, 2001; no technical information was made available to us at that meeting. The only other meeting was one held by the developer on November 20, 2000 at City Hall to "unveil" his preliminary scheme. Although "open to questions", no background information was volunteered by the developer. The city representative present did not advise us of our rights. Additionally, we believe this protect was not adequately posted. The city planner advised us on January 8, 2002 that there was a public posting on Chervil Street. Frankly, this posting, although it may have been there, was not visible to us. No posting was made near the entry road to our property on Etiwanda. Additionally, there should have been a posting on each of the legal parcels comprising this development, especially the ones adjacent to our property. How would we know which parcels the posting applies to? Don Glover and neighborhood friends met with the city planner and the project planner on Tuesday evening, January 8, 2002; the meeting was at our request. Don asked that additional "conditions of approval" be applied to the proposed development to protect our utility and access rights, as well as to ensure that our properties can be feasibly redeveloped in the future if we decide to move from our homes due to the great adverse impact the development will have on our quality of life. The city planner did not make any commitments, but requested that we do a conceptual site plan, embodying our proposed conditions for this planning commission meeting, • today, January 9, 2002. Regrettably, the twenty-four hours available to us was not sufficient to meet his request. Page 1 of 3 ~£ ~ 9 Proposed Additional Conditions of Approval (1) Utilities to Donut Lots -Lot 23 (Glover) and Lot 22 (RuslingZ We understand that we have both a legal easement and possibly prescriptive rights for certain utility lines to our properties through the proposed project. We request that the city condition the developer to provide easements to any future development on our properties to enable such development to "plug-into" the proposed project's water, gas, drainage 8 sewer lines, as well as telephone 8 cable conduits. The infrastructure should be upsized if necessary to accommodate at least 32 apartment units as shown on the developer's conceptual plan for the development of our lots. We want these utility access rights from streets A 8 B as labeled by us for clarity on the attached site plan. (2) Access to Sidewalks. We want access easements to sidewalks on streets "A° & "B°, as well as all 'sidewalks leading out of the development to Foothill Boulevard or Chervil Street. This can also be possible in the form of a public easement to the city. Access to these sidewalks or roads via pedestrians should be allowed at any reasonable location from our properties. (3) Easement on Entry Road and Streets "A" $ "B". We want access easements to the entry road from Etiwanda Avenue (generally shown were our existing easement lies) as well as easements to use streets "A" 8 "B". This can be accomplished also by giving the city a public easement over these areas. Emergency easement access to any future connection by the project to Chervil Street should also be • given. rwn ° rnn The eight foot masonry walls should be eliminated on these streets and replaced with aesthetically pleasing six foot wrought iron fencing. Also, a four foot landscape buffer should be provided between the property lines and the fence on the side of the donut home lots. The city has required this elsewhere. (S) Access Easements Along Streets "A° $ "B° We require two access easements onto Street "A° and one onto Street "B° as shown on the attached plan. Again, we believe we may already have "prescriptive easement rights° along the roads bordering the property lines on two sides of our homes. Again, we request that the city require public easements onto these roads. Similarly, we want the right to have full driveways handling any level of development on our properties connecting to these streets. (6) Electric Gates Eliminated. Consistent with our legal and prescriptive easement rights, there should not be any electric gates along the access road from Etiwanda Avenue or along Streets "A° $ "B° r 1 U ~~ ~ ~ Page 2 of 3 i (~ landscape Screening Heavy landscape screening should be required for the buildings surrounding our property to allow us privacy. The city has required this elsewhere. (8) Construction Access. A specific condition should be imposed on the project allowing for construction access in the event the donut properties are developed. 19) Existing Utilities for Single Family Homes The developer should be required to connect our existing homes on lots 22 and 23 directly to his utility and telephone system. The current connections to Etiwanda Avenue will likely be disturbed during construction anyway. Adequate provisions for utility meters should be made also. 110) Trash ~ Mail Relocation. A condition for an easement for trash pick-up and also mail pick-up should be included for donut lots 22 and 23. Conclusion. These proposed conditions should be considered by the planning commission before anv vote is taken on this project. The staff report briefly touches on easement rights but is sketchy at best and proposed clear conditions. We request that a meeting be set up with the city planner, city engineer, water district, the developer and us to work out an agreement. Sincerely, Do lover ~.C~' Jo Rusting ~£~tl Page 3 of 3 , i rw" 1` • - , s b t •,1~, ~ a', • -~ ~^ •~a (J.~ ~" N - ~ , ~ , ~,; \ ~' u u ~ V ~~iY„y • A~J Y;y !`~ y n o 1 ~ ~y • ~ ' i dd771;~~I~G V ,w - ~ . , P ~ :~Ifi ~ ~Tf ~ '? ~s°. ~I '~. ~4+y~ ~ , fy ~ ~ .; :"; ~ , ~r 4 a + ~., '~; t ~ . ~ ~, o ;I Z ' ~ ~ ~ T LYr _ rb ` ~ , y x ~ u f 1U , ~ Y •Ss 1 11 ..~ u , ~~ ~. .4.i 1 1 1 r-„ '~' ~ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN ~ ~ ~ ETIWANDA ~ ETIWANDA APARTMENTS #2 'D~ ~ (a` i ' >n , , , , ~i~ I xl ~r ; "' L. '~ N ~ ~ ~: °~~ ~ ~ ml ~ ~ ~ I I /~ , 1 ~ , 1 l \~L , TO, lack Lem, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Jim Markman, City Attorney Gry of Rancho Cucamonga FROM SUBJECT: Dear Sirs. Don 8 Tracy Glover 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Joe Rusling 11837 Chevil Street, Rancho Cucamonga Cny OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JAN 15 200 RECEIVEp _ p~NNINN Request for Public Hearing on Environrnental Issues Regarding the Etiwanda Apartments Project (The "Donut Protect") Tracy Glover submitted the attached letter commenting on the Negative Declaration prepared by the City Consultant in regard to the above referenced project This was to be presented at the Planning fommiss~on meeting of January 9 on this project but this prolert was pulled from the agenda. As can be seen from the attached letter, we believe the negative declaration was premature and that the consultant's review of the issues Is woefully incomplete. Furthermore, because of the impact that the above devebpment, referred to by ctty staff as the 'Donut Projects, has on our homes and our neighbors lying In the "whole of the donut", a pubbc hearmg shou~d have been held with the cry consultant to solint questions and comments and to outline the scope of the environmental analysis. This was not done. In her letter, Tracy has prepared comments and raised questions about the city's environmental consultant's report. These questions should be addressed in writing before anything else happens on this protect. Additionally, a pubbc meeting a forum should be held to beef and solicit questions and comments from our neighbors; these questions and comments should then also be answered in writing. It is our understanding that state law required a public meeting and public input on protects of this magnitude before they sre approved and that the public is entitled to have their questions and comments answered m writing. Therefore, we believe that any Planning Commission vote at the newly rescheduled meeting of January 13, 2001 Is greatly premature. At best, this meeting should be a publ(cly noticed meeting on the consultant's environmental report m which the public can ask questions and make comments. This should be followed by follow-up meetings In which the consultant addresses the community's concerns and subsequently answers these concerns in writing, Page J of 2 ~ ~. ~ 13 r On a related matter, we understand that the city arranged to have a meeting room available to Mr, Prevlri (Forecast) and we and our neighbors in the "donut hole" presumably so that Mr. Prewri can make another bid for our homes. The my should know that in a prevwus `group !neeting` In Mr. Prevltl's off(ce a few weeks ago, Mr. Prevlt~ appeared desirous of negotiating with us and our fellow neighbors of the "donut hole" as a group. As we remember, ha said he had only one million dollars to buy our houses and that we end our neighbors should decide among ourselves how to split it up. It appeared to us as If Mr Prevfti was throwing a bone onto the middle of his conference table and expecting us and our neighbors to fight over it like a pacK of wdd dogs. This was quite humdtatmg to us, although we hope to believe that this was not Mr. Prewtt's intent. In this regard, we think it was a very bad ides that the city provide city facilities to facilitate Forecast's "group negotiation" on Wednesday rnght, such action by the city can only be mistakenly interpreted by the commun~ry that the city is mvohred in the "bone throwing" or, tossing crumbs to the "donut hole' homeowners, as well. Therefore, and for your Information, we have informed Forecast that we will only negotiate with him m private and not with our neighbors (or city staff present and that we believe that our other neighbors should get the same courtesy of "confidentiality" that we seek). In conclusion, we think the city was previously moving too quickly on this project up until its planned January 9, 2002 Planntng Commission meeting. Fortunately, this Item was pulled from the agenda at the January 9 meeting and the planned final vote of approval did not Dear. We request that more public hearings and meetings and or forums will be held to insure that arty final vote by the Planning Commission is fair and reasonable to all parties. Finally, you should know that Don Glover's family has owned his hornesite for over 100 years and ice Rvsling has lived in his home for many long years. SIn~ Don Glover Tracy I J uslirtg cc: City Planntng Commission Pale ? of 2 ~~Eiy TO: Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Tracy Glover 7954 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT: Project: Etiwanda Apartments/DRC 2001-00557 Initial Study Proposed Negative Declaration January 9, 2002 Dear Members of the Planning Commission. I am greatly disturbed by the recommended negative declaration proposed by staff for the above referenced project. I believe that the city's Contract Environmental Analyst overlooked several key issues• Issue 1. Land Use Plannin (a) The consultant maintains that there is "no impact" in regard to issue 1 (Land Use 8 Planning) on the Environmental Checklist. Specifically, no impact is recorded for the following items (b) conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. (c) be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity. (d) disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established commurnty. In regard to item (b), the project does conflict with an established city planning policy that projects should not be distorted and piecemeal. The city should have required that the "hole in the donut" be acquired before this disjointed development be approved. In regard to item (c), this project is not compatible with existing land uses in that it virtually surrounds nine residential homes on eight lots. My home (lot 23) and my neighbor toe Rusting (lot 22), are surrounded on three sides by this development. '1~~ X15 ~ _1_ In regard to item (d), the development will significantly "disrupt" or divide the physical arrangement of an established community. The continuity of single family homes along Etiwanda Avenue is being disrupted by placing this high-density development between our single family homes and the single family homes to the north on Etiwanda Avenue, some of which are historic. Additionally, the perceived access to our homes from Etiwanda Avenue is virtually eliminated, forcing residents to drive through a high density apartment complex with no indication from Etiwanda that there are privately owned homes surrounded by this development. The consultant views this issue in terms of building height compatibility, rather than as a density and access issue. Issue 3: Geological Problems. The consultant maintains that there is no impact in regard to item (e), landslides and mudflows, and a potentially significant impact for item (f), erosion, change in topography, etc., unless mitigated. In regard to item a (landslides or mudflows) we believe that possible impacts may result to lots 20 and 23 (the hole in the donut) because it appears that these lots are at a lower level than the proposed development. Regardless, there is no evidence of any engineering study addressing this impact on any of the residential lots. In regard to item f (erosion, change in topography, etc) the consultant makes no reference to the impact on the "donut lots" and how any potential impact would be mitigated. Issue 4• Water. Again, the consultant failed to consider the impact on the "donut properties" in regard to all issues here. Because of the possible adverse impact in regard to the "donut properties", the applicant should prepare a storm drainage study to the engineering division addressing the impacts on the above referenced property and the overall area before this project is approved. We understood that this is the standard policy for large scale projects. The environmental consultant should have this study available before making any findings here. Issue 6. Transportation/Circulation. The consultant did not address the transportation and circulation issues on the "donut properties". In particular, the consultant states that there is no impact in regard to item (c), "inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses". However, there is no discussion about emergency access/egress plans for the "donut properties". Additionally, the consultant maintains that there is no impact in regard to item (e) "hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists". Specifically, the "donut properties" are "walled-in" along the property their Imes with no access to sidewalks or surrounding internal streets (except disputed limited easements). -z- 1~£ E I~ Issue 13: Aesthetics. The consultant says there is no impact in regard to the above. I disagree. (1) the architectural character of the development is not consistent with the architectural character of the "donut properties". (2) My property, and the others, is being surrounded by an eight-foot high block wall, right on the property line, with no landscape setbacks as often is required by the city so as to aesthetically protect adjacent properties affected. Issues Not Addressed by Consultant The consultant did not address the following: a) Economic Impact. The Economic Impact on the Value of Donut Homes surrounded by Development was not addressed. How much will the value of the homes go down? b) Impact of Construction On "Donut Homes" In particular, 1) interrupted access to donut homes, 2) breakage of existing utilities to homes, 3) construction site hazard protection during grading 8 excavation, 4) security, 5)interruption of mail delivery, 6) mitigation measures for dust and noise, and 7)interim drainage measures to protect donut homes from water drainage during grading operations. c) Existing Utilities to "Donut Homes" Can these utilities be integrated into proposed development at a later date, if any of these properties are redeveloped? Can future development on the donut lots "plug into" the proposed development's utility system as to facilitate the permissible level of apartment development? d) Alternative Building Plan Consistent with Surrounding Single Family One Story Homes. Impact of one-story development vs. two-story development not addressed. Also, single family homes are being eliminated, discouraging the traditional home ownership pattern for the area. Was condominium development, rather than rental housing, investigated as a better way to provide for the needs of the community? e) Legallssues. Outstanding issues remain unaddressed about both existing easements and "prescriptive easements." My family and my neighbor,loe Rusting, believe that we have possible prescriptive easement rights that the city may not have taken into consideration. -3- '1~~ ~ ~^1 My Conclusions: . This initial study is woefully inadequate. It does not address the above stated issues raised. A negative declaration is far to premature here. I request that no vote be taken on this project until the following occurs. 1. The city consultant addresses these issues in writine. 2. The affected property owners have a public meeting with the city, consultant and developer in regard to the above. 3. Proper mitigation measures are put in place to protect the "donut properties" surrounded by this development. I understand via my conversations with legal 8 environmental consultants that the city must, by law, address in writing our questions and responses to the city environmental consultant's report, before you vote on this project. Additionally, we must also insist on a public forum on these issues before any action is taken. Sincerely, Tracy over ! • ~~~I$ -~- ~, ~; a, .' {~~~ - ~~ , .l ~J ~/ I f ~ ~ f .b I / :1~i. ~~1'' >0 I3 :Y,~ i I ~ I ~~tS1,~~; It i ;Y +n ''~{ 1 r ~ ~ ~I ~ 't ° I ' I a o . ~{ -' A ~t ~~~ ~ H A 0 A _` 1 I ~ ~ a ' 'x.111 , n ~'i IY-{v ~ ~~~~ ~ i ~ .___ SI » p J_ i r~ r ~~ ' . fi ~4F~1 J ~ _ ! ~ ~ ~ a ;`/ ~ I '~ ~i U ~~ ~ ~ . -- u ~ r e ~ .I -n------ I I J L ~ 9 +,~ u , u " s u u ~~ I I e , M I 1 ~~\ / {vy i ^ 'r' i , a JI '-.'k` ;-" ~;- CONCEPTUAL LANDS ~ 1 PE MASTER PLAN ~ a - ~ a a ETI WANDA AVE ETIWANDA APARTMENTS #2 ~ ~ E ~ L °t . ~ nnncxo cl~onoa auwxrii~ ~ .t C/ TO: Brad Buller, City Planner DATE• January I6~~ Kitt Court', Associate Planner AN~Ht7 RUC Planning Commission NG City of Rancho Cucamonga JAN 17?Op2 FROM Undersigned Neighbors Surrounded by the "Donut ProjectRF~E~VEp - F ~ANN~NG PROTECT: Etiwanda Apartments RE• January 17, 2002 Meeting Forecast Homes at City Hall We, the undersigned, strongly object to the above referenced meeting. We understand that the purpose of the meeting, according to the city, is for the 'developer and residents to work out their differences" and that a "city representative will be available to answer technical questions". This meeting has no agenda and was not publicly noticed. If this meeting was intended to be another meeting between Forecast (the developer) and the affected residents of the "donut project" for the purpose of allowing Forecast to "collectively" negotiate with our fellow neighbors over the acquisition of our homes, we strongly object. We insist on our right to individual "confidentiality" in any negotiation and refuse to be pitted against our neighbors in dividing up the limited total amount forecast maybe willing to pay However, if the purpose of the meeting was to work out a "deal" with the developer as to how he should develop his property, we likewise object because this would be usurping the authority of the planning commission and the "right of the public to know". not attend the January 17. 7002 meeting, However, we da request that the city hold additional public meetings and/or public forums on the followmg• (1) Whether this project is the appropriate design for the neighborhood, including the Issues of apartments vs. the benefit of home ownership (like aone-story condominium development); Page 1 of 2 p ~ ~ a~ 4 (~) The proposed negative declaration by the city consultant on this project (we believe the current study and determination is woefully inadequate and public environmental study "scopmg" meetings with the city consultant are necessary), and, (3) "conditions of approval" That may be placed on this project to protect to protect our quality of life if we elect to remain or, if we are forced to move out, protect the development potential of our properties. We appreciate your understanding in these matters and hope you w(II consider the above requests. Sincerely, the u ersigned: A3 -P'ie Na Name Name _79s-y ~~~A~o~ ddress Address A dress Address Pagc 2 of 2 ~~. Ea i TO &ad Buller, City Planner Jack Lam, City Manager Jim Markman, City Atromey City of Rancho Cucamonga DATE' January 16, 2002 fR• Don Glover-7954 Etlwando Ave, Rancho Cucamonga Jce Rusting -12837 Chervil Street, Rancho Cucemonga PROJECt. Eitwanda Apartments -Forecast Homes RE: January 17, 2002 Meeting Dear Sirs JP Q~,P 1 received a letter in my mail box on January 15, 2002 rn regard to the above referenced meeting. Kitt Coury, Associate Planner with the Crty, called me the evening of January 15, 2002 to remind me about the meeting. He said the purpose of the meeting was for the developer and the residents surrounded on three sides of this development (referred to as the 'donut hole` protect) to "work out them differences" and that "a city representative would be there to answer technical questions First, if this is a meeting for Previri to negotiate far the purchase of eight houses in a "collective" setting with all the affected "donut hole' residents present, as he has previously attempted to do, then this is highly unacceptable to us. As we pointed out to all of you in our letter of January 15, 2002 (copy enclosed), we believe that it is our right, as well as that of the other "donor hole" homeowners) to have "confidentially" many negotiations unth Mr Prevrti. As a side Wore, we did send a letter to Mr Prevlti on January 15, 2002 requesting to negotiate with him for the purchase of our properties with *he condition of confidentiality; Mr. Prewti turned down our offer In his letter dated January 16, 2002. Our lever to Mr. Previti and his letter of response to us rs attached Second, if the purpose of this meeting is for the developer (Forecast) and the "donut hole" homeowners to privately hammer out or negotiate conditions of approval among ourselves, then we think this is highly unusual. Our understanding is that It Is for the Planning Commission, after receipt of written recommendations from the planning staff, to decide on the merits of approving this Protect and what condition of approvals shoo{d be placed on this Pro)ect. ~r ~ ~~~~ ~ G~ G\,(`I~F~PN ~,~,`~ ti~~~ ~\~G ~p~Eaa A "c!ty staff representative standing by to answer techn!cal questions" while the developer and the "donut hole" residents "resolve our differences" sounds Ilke a "back rcom" deal, we would assume that the Planning Commissioners would strongly disapprove of such back room agreements that usurp their author!ty. in any event, we have already written a letter to the Planing Commission, dated January 9, 2002, outl!ning the conditions of approval that we believe should be Imposed on this Profed ixfore its approval, That letter was intended to be read at the Planning Comm!ssion's January 9, 2002 meeting; but this Project was pulled from the agenda so we delivered the letter she next day to the Planning Department. As of the wr!ting of this letter, we have not received any response ftom the City regarding our letter dated January 9, 2002. In conclusion, this January 17, 2002 meeting appears to have no agenda. We can only assume that the purpose for it is either 1) to facilitate Forecast's ability to negotiate "collectirely" with the "donut hole" homeowners without our respective rights to 'ccnfident~ality" or 2) to "work out a back room agreement between the developer and the "donut hole" homeowners in regard to conditions of approval. Again, this vrc beliere is tantamount to back room negotiations that usurp the authority of the Planning Commission and the right of the public to know. In either case, we feel that it would ba inappropriate for us to attend this ill advised private meeting being held at City Hall. However, we would be qu!te happy to attend a publicly noticad meeting for design review and technical review meetings where we can voice our concerns and present out case for our "proposed conditions of approval" ies outlined in the Don Glover 8 toe Rusting letter of January 9, 2002) to representatives of the Planning Commission, the developer would presumably have the same opportunity here to present his case. Secondly, we again urge the City to hold a public meeting or forum on the environmental survey 8 Proposed Negative dec'aration for the Frvlect by the pity consultant; as sra*ed in Tracy Glover's letter of January 4, 2002 on the proposed negative declerstion, we believe that serious issues remain unanswered and must be addressed In separate public hearings before this project can be voted on by the Planning Commission. Finally, vre are ready to meet with staff or participate in a public Forum to da~ify our letters regarding "conditions of approval" and the proposed Negatrre Detts!ailort. we will also be wi;lii~g to debate the deveoper in this regard if the city so desires, in a public forum that is publicly noticed. Please calf Don Glover at 409-463-6061 if you have any questions. 5lr.erer I~, D¢,i Glover 1 ~' Rusting f`~ D~ E~3 / ~~ \~ I~ FORECAST HOMES ~ MONFS f:r a AtN ~FeF2tl lOtl January 16, 2002 Don Glover 7954 Euwaada Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RF: FORECAST HOMIiS, ETFWANDA At'ARTNENT PROJECT. Mr Gloves: On behalf of Forecast Homes, I would hke to thank you for yow willingness to resolve the Issues involving our proposed apartment development Howevu, I feel that Forecast has m good•faitlF made a consorted effort m acgttirufg your property, and have presented alI we are prepared to offer At this tune, we ate enable to fuNru iaegotiau the acquisition of your properry• as I feel, we tvtll not successfully resolve the disparity between what we arc willing to offer and your asking puce We welcome yow future mvohement and participauon in the development process, as we have scheduled a Community Mccung, January 17°i Tri-CotnmtnFittes Room, City of Rancho Cucamonga for such propose, I apprectate your time and active mtenst in this matter Su-cerely, n Jimmy w:• Area Manager Forecast Homes 3536 Concout> Street Su,u t00 • OnL1l,0, CA 41>64 • Pnone 909 a83 7320 • Fa>t 909 980.111+9 www foreaethomes com ~£ ~°~`'~ T.^^.. J!nrmy ~nn,h. -t.rgTC JY•:e~i '.S, :f)D2 Torc~:s• Nr+mes FROM ion t;4fver 7954 Etiwanda AvenJe - Re ".Li.U f;uvmonge k;t Ruslii~ tIt37 Chervil Street - Rarxho Cucamonga RE Meeting of January 17, 2002 Dear Timmy' Thank you for your mvitat,on for a group meeting on Thursday,lanuary 17. However. Don ,s our of town ;oa S Gon can meet w,th you pr!vately the following week, the week of January 20, ,n the eventng• However, we want arty negotiations regarding the acquisition of our property to be stnctly confidential !n regard to the substance of our meeting, any terms d~scussed and the people Involved in the negotiations. toe ~ Don, and/or our representative, will meet with you to consider the sale of out ~o!nt properties as a package. If this is acceptable to you, please let us know of a time and a meeting place for the week of Jsnuary ID We do not went to meet et tfie City, Isc~v ,sbx,t Don Mover's home? rf you agras tv uur dosire for confidentiality, please initial or ngn this letter bebw and fax it iascl~ io me at 909-4630105 and Include a note on the day rnd rime you wish ro meet '- - • -- •- -s^-••b!e at the'rro pranous !Ito?' you undaia.i~i4 mei we ,Bn y„n~ vi,w••.•... •~ meetings. Although we are Sure It was tint Your In+ent, n apPeered to us and nut ralghbors thst you were !hrowing a bone cn the trick with a one million dollar price tag and expect us and our ne;Qhhors ; ,. fl~:ht nnr !t I,ke wi,d ~~gs Remember that you d,d say at our meehrt~, t~rtrs r so weeks ago tha+ yo.< <x+!y yed ,Z.~ ntillpr, dw~u~ to cwnd and that ~v:y at;d ovr neighbors sr~.tlr! d.xide huw L iNiii it ,;p s-ong pyrulyes, TI'i15 saetrie3 n4inewhat humil~afing u: Tfre ;!e, r~~t a F.norv +hat this was not your iFFsii, hi,++lrg e-ld rtti=• y~ under sranrf our co'~~:ern for cpnfidentiadiry li, any neAot~et+ons -not just for us put fix our •teighcc•s, as well. Sincweiy, S+,v' r.,Ipv~r Jae R,.,,+~ _._. ~_-.- - ~~t~s TCt lack Lam, C•t;r ~a~sa~rr C st.t ;.rtunry 15, rJ02 Brad Buller, City Planner hm Markman, City A•to~~e~ C%ry cf Rancho Car sr.onga FROM ~:on Fs "ra_y G!a.~er 7654 Etiwandc- Aven.•e, :iar:M Cc+can.-nga Jos F.us'~ng 1283' rhevii ~t •ee°, Ratr_ra Lt--ar.4n~a 5UBIECT• Request for Public Heen•:g on rnv:ro~~m~ntal Issues Regarding tha ~tiwanda apartments Project (The "Don,•t F:olect") Dear Sirs Tracy Glover submitted the attached letter commenting on the Negative Declaration prepared by the City Consultant in regard to the above referenced project, This was to be presented at the Planning Commission meeting of January 9 on this project but this proiect was pulled from the agenda. As can be seen from the attached letter, we believe the negative declaration was premature and that the consultant's review of the issues is woefully incomplete. Furthermore, because of the impact that the above development, referred to by city staff as the "Donut Project", has on our homes and our neighbors lying In the "whole of the donut°, a public hearing should have been held with the ci+y tut-suhant to solicit questions and cattments and to outl:rte the sco;r~ of the environmental analysis. This was not done. In her irtter,'racy has prepared comments and rased questions about the city`s emdron-nenral consultant's report Tn:•4 ~.urs'i^ns src ,dd be addressed In writing ~eec;.+•e anything else hapoens on this pro;¢ct Add,t~anaiiy, a public meeting or `au~r. s~rould be held to brief and solicit questions and commer.tR from our caig~bors; these questions end comments should then also be answered m writing It ~s our understandmg that state law required a public meenng and public inp~a an pra;c{ts of this magnitude before they are approved end that the puF:ic is entitled to have'hssr questions a^d comments answered ~~ xrlting. Therefore, we believe that any Planning Commiss~on vote at the newly rescheduled meeting of January 23, 2CD2 is greatly premature. At best, fl'oa meenng sFcsuid t~~ r: pcc~:cty Y1.^~f cc+~_~ +neeting or the consultant's environment3i report !n i~rh ~ h 'ke public can a,k questions anc: ~;ero c~ :,;peat;. This s ~v~id be ioliowed 'oy follow-up meetings in which the consultant sdu•asses the community's concerns and subsequemly answers these concerns in wrirmo. - -o- ..,. •~ ~ ~ ~ Co • On a related mat<<r, wt u,tdarsiaro ,ray •ha city =r~ar*-ayd •:, gave a r•~e~sting roam available to Mr. P-eviti (Forecsst) ar:i we and c•.- r~elbrtxrs ir, the `donut hde" prsur.^,eftty so that Mr Prevrti can make at~otF:~r bid fa our ho;*.as she afv should kr~w that :n r { re~iou: "group meeting" In Mr i'rNViti'5 nfS'r@ r `eµ, weJ.T d~^, ~+%' ,°,~?.ift' a~o~'ac tmsl~ods ~f negotiet{ng with us and our fallow ~~ei~r~ha. ~c of the "cv •;.t ~ got," as :, gro;tp. A: k;tr tart. lrwber, he said he had only one m'Ihon dc,ilars to buy our ;ara.fes err t"n• we ~~ nun r~ighb:-3 rtculd decide among ourselves now +a; scut rr .-~ !+ aNne»rGr± ,o ;,~ ds rf N!r, ?rert~ wins throwing a bvne onto the middle of his c'~^tFrercc ,a~)Ic ='+:; ea;,t-ct•:r~ „ an. o~,; retgH~o~s •o'•ight aver ~t like a pack of wdd d~s's *r.:, was quire hum,:xting tc ,~,, although we hot+.: to Geliave that this was not Mr Pre•rta; s ~nr°nr, In this regard, wet !ta;~k •, ."a, a rep"~ [79a t-~e±~ that rye 4,ty 1i, 8r,~~ 41tY i'B~~~Il rii"e t~ fecal?tat•. Forecasts "group negotiation" on Wednesday night; such action by the city can only be mistakenly interpreted by the community that the city is Involved in the "bone throwing" or, tossing cr~.~mb, to the "~ton~~r l-ie~°" F~urneuv~rzrs, as well. Therefore, and for your information, we have informed Forecast that we will only negotiate with him in private and not with our neighbors (or city staff present and that we believe that our other neighbors should get the same courtesy of "confiden•iality" that we seek), I n conclusion, we think the city was previously moving too quickly on this protect up until its planned January 9, 2002 Planning Commission meetin .Fortunately, this item was pulled from the agenda at the January 9 meeting and the planned final vote of approval did root occur, We request that more public hearings and meetings and or forums will be held to insure that any fine! vote by the Planning Commission is fair and reasonable to all parties. Finally, yo,r should know that Don Glover's family has owned his hornesite for over 100 years a^d Joc tausl,r~g `05 i,ved .n his home for many bng years. Sincerely, Don Glover Tracy Glover toe fta,aU:g cc Ci~y"annutibCan•.~.^.~tsion Page 2 of 2 ~£ ~ a~ JAN-17-02 O8.2AAH FROtFFOREGST HOLES SOCAL 8081837331 T-108 P O1/O1 F-dll FORECAST HUMES 7aouary 17, 200? ltirt Cowry 10500 Civtc Center Dr. P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 itE: Wrrsnanw.u. of PwaCE4 No. 227-Z11-o17 Feni<s OalcuVwl. SusNll~-rwl. PnctucE. T'f Mwp SUB 1 b257. Mr. Cowry, As a matter of course, 1 would like to modify the original submission packet of Forecast Homes, to constnlct 368 apartment units at the North West comer of Etiwanda Blvd and Foothill. The case that the City is ctmently processing, will naw exclude parcel number 227-211-017. 1 appreciate your time and consideration in this matter. If you have any questions please cantac[ me at 909-721-8166. Sincerely, ~ , ~-t- i ~ ~~ ~~` John Miles Plannrng Specialist Forecast Homes 353D Concouex Stzeet Sulu 100. Ont~no, CA 917(rP • I'Loor 909483 7320 • Fax 909.9801169 ~\ ~~1 www.l'omcuthaoxs.mtq rp~Eag u U T H E C I T Y O F ANC60 CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE January 9, 2002 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRONt Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Kirt A Coury, Associate Planner r1 SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 26 7 acres of land Into one lot for condominium purposes in the Medium Residential Dlstnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay Dlstnct, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Dlstnct within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN• 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 Related file Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land in the Medium Residential Dlstnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Dlstnct within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard -APN• 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related file. Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration r1 LJ PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A Proied Density 13.8 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoninc North - I-15 Freeway South - Community Commercial East - Medium Residential (8-14 (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - I-15 Freeway il~~. dwelling units per acre)/Low Medium Residential ~ E~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 & DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST HOMES January 9, 2002 Page 2 C General Plan Designations Project Site -Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - I-15 Freeway South - Community Commeraal East - Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)/Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre West - I-15 Freeway D Site Charactenstics• The property is generally flat, sloping downward to the south and east The site is currently vacant with native trees and grasses present. Eight existing single-family residences, located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site, are not a part of the proposed project. E Parkino Calculations Multi-Family/Condominium Residential Type Number Parking Number of Number of of Use of Units Ratio Spaces Spaces Reawred Provided One Bedroom 158 1.50/unit 237 Two Bedroom Three Bedroom 188 22 1 80/unit 2 00/unit 339 44 Guest Parking 0 25/unit 92 Total 712 719 ANALYSIS• A. General. The protect is located wthin the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District, which regwres a Conditional Use Permit to develop except for single-family homes. The project density of 13 8 dwelling units per acre is essentially at the top of the density range for this zone, therefore, transition of density to adjoining single-family homes is critical The Sde Plan has been designed to create transitions through bulling orientation and setbacks to the identified single-family residences. The pro/ect includes a total of 41 apartment bwldmgs comprised of four buiding types In addition, two recreation buildings with one office/leasing building are included in the proposed protect The proposed buildings fronting Etiwanda Avenue have enhanced elevations and the building masses include both two-story and one-story elements to articulate the massing There are 19 two-story apartment buildings proposed along the freeway comdor at the north and west project perimeter The bwldmgs are plotted to assist with the mitigation of freeway noise Single- story garage structures perform as a good buffer and low building mass transition along the south property line, adjacent to the commeraal property A substantial recreation/open space corridor is provided within the development, which wll include both active and passwe recreation facilities Active recreation uses include a community pool and spa, several tot lots, half court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, barbecue areas, and exerase faalities within the recreation building The • bwldmgs will include a stucco finish, painted wood knee braces, ledge-stone battered walls, and a concrete flat file roof The protect perimeter wll involve 6-foot high tubular steel fencing and split face masonry wall Fenang along Etiwanda Avenue will include tubular steel fencing with decorative native stone plasters ~~ E 3a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 & DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST HOMES January 9, 2002 Page 3 B Design Review Committee The Committee (McNeil, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on November 20, and December 4, 2001 At the December 4, 2001, meeting, the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the protect, subtect to the applicant's providing stone wainscot treatment on all sides of the buildings fronting Etiwanda Avenue It should be noted that the applicant has provided the wainscot treatment to the front and side elevations, but not to the rear The applicant met with the City Planner on January 2, 2002, to consider other options to resolve the matter Action comments from the Design Review Committee have been attached for your convenience (Exhibit I) The City Planner will continue to work vnth the applicant and hopes to bring a recommended solution to the Planning Commission on the use of native rock on the buildings faang Etrvvanda Avenue C. Grading Review and Technical Review Committees The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on November 20, 2001. The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on November 21, 2001. Both Committees recommended approval of the project subtect to conditions contained in the attached Resolutions of Approval. D Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 Several mature trees exist throughout the protect site The only other plant materials are annual and perennial weeds and grasses. Several of the mature trees that occur on-site must be removed to allow for the proposed construction The trees are subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No 276. The impact is not considered significant due to the protect design which includes planting numerous box size trees E Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on November 20, 2001. Twelve people attended the meeting, which included property owners of the single-family residences, located on the inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the project site. The residents asked questions and raised concerns regarding traffic, access, drainage, maintaining asingle-family quality of life and neighborhood in the middle of an apartment protect, and the potential negative impacts to the property values of the single- famdy homes. The developer presented the project regarding site design, building orientation, parking, access and landscaping to address several of the identified concerns. The nearest budding to the L-shaped property is 32 feet from their common property line F Environmental Assessment The Initial Study has been prepared. Staff determined that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact through short-term air quality impacts during site preparation such as grading and equipment exhaust Staff also determined that there may be noise impacts to future residents within the subject development resulting from traffic along the I-15 freeway and Etiwanda Avenue, as well as biological impacts resulting from on-site tree removal A noise study was prepared which identified noise attenuation measures The protect design cleverly uses bwldings along the west boundary as the sound attenuation barrier, hence, no sound wall is necessary along the 115 Freeway Special sound attenuation design will be necessary for those units faang Etiwanda Avenue Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality and predicted future noise impacts to a less than significant impact and trees are regwred to be replaced pursuant to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No 276. If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the prolect site b~ E 3 I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16257 8 DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST HOMES January 9, 2002 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, S Brad Buller City Planner BB:KC\Is Attachments. Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map 16257 Exhibit "0"- Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" -Landscape Plan Exhibit "G"- Elevations Exhibit "H"- Floor Plans Exhibit "I" -Design Review Committee Minutes, Dated November 20, and December 4, 2001 Exhibit "J" -Environmental Initial Study Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 ~~ ~ E 3a- ~ LOCATI~ MAP SU BTT16257/DRC2001-00557 MILLER AVENUE J 't U $aGred Heavr-l- Ghu~-D- W Z W Q ~~ !~ Q "~ D 3 5 ~R ~" W Z~2 ~-~ar-~w~eK'~5 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Project Slte All Parcels ~Intarstate 1S Fwy Q 0 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 4800 Feet V ~e ~ ~I~ ~ ,~ "~E ~Y e"~ 9 ~ °s3~, ey,a ~~i~k 6~ii~ M ~~~ z 0 .. E. N r-~ a .. F W F .-, i` 1f7 C~2 .-. F U d H W F d H z w F E z w F d a .~ ~, a W ~ 0. 7 P: ~ °x Q ~~I z=w ~~I ~ ~! ~ y ~ ~ z U II ---- ---- ----- -4' - - -- ---_-- run wEU ~, . ~ ° ~ ~ -T---------------- ~ ~ i~ i ~ y E: p 2 S=11 v ° , i ew ~ f I / ~ ~/ ~ ~ I ~ ~•~ 'oa; @~ E ~ I /~ ~~ 1 ~ o I ]~ ~ F ~l5~ 3. '~ i e I ~ Fe:dF' v ~ III I G o I I I ~ ° eei 3 831 i~~i ~3IE ~~'~1 I j d~~~--~/~j/ ~i ~ r Q " ~ X ~: ~ "Y i @@Pq ;~~B s I / a, / o: g _ 3 I ~ ,ao," f .~~ ~ / / <~f r ~~ Y t` „~. a ..-~ ''~ f e~qe>~~~>Y'' Iii' ~uovimv°_%.''}:~ ~ i~~ .~~, e : ,,,,; , I / .. ~ .b~ ~ ~~Y~ ;~~,; ~ a- ~ ~~, ,~, I _ } ~1~,~ I wig ,.fie \~~ftl0` r_-X-{~ iF ~ •yav. nn. ~' E+<g //f ,J 1+~~ - ?`;1~• 4 1'~~ r3'~ ;~ _l~~°II I r ~~~ `~ T~' - :.~ ~~em,. ~~ l ~i I ' ~~° ~ Z ~ ~ i A ~' 1~~~ ~ , III e s~ ~ "~ y't ,@~ 5 ~ ~ C i I F e ~~ ~ E t ~ ~z ~i r - ~~~ ~ . ~ ~ 3i~ +bt~~~'a'_~ 5 ~ ~ i ~ _ ~ I p,_ e i I __~ _, _ _ '4' .Css:ia°>rn~i _ _ _ -__ _ <~.~ - i~da :pia ~-~ 0.. ~ i~ - _ '~~ - i ~" f1~~_~1i ~~ ~~_ ',~ ___ __ _ __ ~I_ -- __ ,~, - ~ ~ 'v~ ++~~~, -I,' ~ \~ •, I I _ FOOTHILL PgM1FV~pp BTPTE PWEE b ~ ____ Ir i ~~ i \~ > ~ II ~~ .~ ~~ k ~ , F ~ r O e `L 1 4 ~~~_~ !yt nDn 5 li 1 N991+tf>9' Bannwo A DETAILED SITE PLAN ETIWANDA APARTMENTS .~ .,ve,d A+41+•.~. APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ` ~ DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW & ~ ~, FORECAST GROUP J~a Rnd+SeuEAnoB atmawo TENTATIVE MAP \ __ uev .,,...,,,z., mner~:~ su+olo cuwuaea.e urm mnABr ccc eRP~~[~e IDiA CIVIC R`I(FJ DWP. \ .wno^~ sAnwo aecwDBaa u enA +a YUy FlIDNG IeW+m fm e,.[ryglenlln r ~ ~ UNIT SUMMARY n~ BtnO On'IA+°ml ~'U' X SEE63UMMARV V T9 ~ : oP U.~'ml :~ mass •BCS m+Ac h _ ~'o,~ (;~' aP.ee~ ~,.. mrAl.urrtrs xelrv y rn:rowsm Umwec p //S ao enuWpl ~wuetn MTIISABIEOPw5MC8 b)AC 1~%) 4 ~ aY • II 4a4Ty %yn~ ~r~rs.uvn. '" PRODUCEeSUMMeARY f PaYnRI .Nrtle gglPy • 1 Yaq Yxlle _ 'E~. C . P. ~~ RJPeILM afTia y ouP mru. rum Pn ewmr - ~ .vma +ew auna ertaF BuBnwa ~• ewmAO .eem .uxm ~ ~ n ~a Pin ar e. ms anxv51 .+'a uePivmo rtmAa num vun„ ie+l uv... ~~~ ~~ ~evrn e~uvoer~mB. fi • u Ps RNING SUMMARY v~ Buanwa a /~ 1NP+R1 lYR AM! IIWIIP® (DIAL F~ t t ~YaePpuip ~, avrt~ F ~ +' w ~~ au c a n 7 ~ ~ aim P 'v=~ `~ a Irr vv x ~• u E mm noR ~u~a.~ u.e.~.... ~~ •,~ F a ~. ne .a e.m~r roru.euPmm .u.orori ~cc - ~Ba~ ~R. ~~.~...~ L .d - I ILO ~,~'~ 'k a - ""^ t _ -` ~ - mmrr~ - __=__ rt-_- 0 M`y. - >M1 wuw \ ~' ILILOI k , ( `RAJ //'/.*/ -~ .® nm Yrt _ ^ J r_A ~!• ~e I I • n.POeno. \.. ~ Se• MOIECT T_- ~7 l f•• _ _ _ ~.-~____ dd - .__~6~mm-_1 _ L I ., - wnr -r.' un _ __ _- vorlewrrrn~~€f+IWANDAA ~(j•--- nvra ____________ ss u V § ~e ~~ ~~~ 3 £ etww z p- z ~o z~ ao za c5 ~. a '~ as ~W ~, x a~ Wo ~~ z 0 U CV ..-i F U d ai F W 9 ... F d F z w F F z w F d P. .-~ .-~ a 4 w ~~o a O~~ z~~ ~~~ ~ :i~ ___~ - ~ 1 .~., y~ L -- I ~ I it _ ~~. ,~ -%s~_ -q~-' --_ i~a 3 _~ _ i- ;_.~~_ _ .. _..._.._-.Y,.___, ~_ fVOf 'S ft Lit S-t,IjQ~ :~~7Af1 "k ~; 1 - _ - -- _ .-_ ~,.. ..r-` ~_ -- -_- - - _ ~' ^~ ~ ,_.,, y a'\' ~~ s it ~`~ 4 ~~ i \\ ~' ~, f ~ =L --- -- -- - -- - - -- - -- - ---- j \ S~__ ~\~~ ~'' ~ - _ _ -- ~ ~- - - - y ~~ ~~~. ~~, _ i \\ ~o'~~;~\\\'o.__ la ~a~~~~\ \ ~ _ ~~44e +i P G \~ - \ ~ \ \ \ \\~J \~`\~\ \f +~ ~I ~~\\~ \\ ~< I \ \\~~\``\\_ i `~J~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~ , \ ~. ., _ ~' g:E i o ~~ \ fp. I \ r @~ ~3e i I \ r ~ ~E; E r ~~ di i 1 sei . C /~ /h ~ 7 ~i ~I I I ~~ ~ 'I ~~ i(~ i, ~~ ®~ z az ' Ur E: Z O ~I d ~ ~~ ~ ~ ii ~a ~ a i w O F ~~ ao I v z ' U II t` Ifs GV cD .-~ F U ~i F 7 F F z F ~1 x ~ !I ~ i' -. -. ~~a ~ ~ o C V U ti~~ B ~ ~' Cz )~~ ~I _t ...-; ~ ~~.rv, l .~- j_ - -~ ~- ' _~~ - -~ --- ---- ~~n 7 N^^ ~J ~~ Lw ~~_ Y[xP+ [ ~~ ~~ i t.e f ,.~~.`~ 1 ~ f E .a..e.e_ .. _ a~ rrzwert Naenv ss!rmuaR~ o ° w.4.°. CAMINO REAL II APARTMENTS wxcso cucuoxw cNnovru SARES-REGIS GROUP TENTATIVE TRACT 16257, CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN """ ,,A.. DETAIL SHEET ®=`- ~='~~ ~~m~ai YGipN j VICINITY MAP v<+rM v _w ~LICTI f l~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ <a U ~~~~©® ~' ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~~3 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~S . ~~~ ~~ p~g ~g~g ~ d < ~ L SB " C~ e . ~ "~ e ~~W ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ pp ®~®00 .. ~ ,. a ~ a i i!!~ ~{ ~ ~ slji~ai~Pd{ {~, i~ { ~~ as S ~t ~A{ ~ ~1 ~~~1~~~~~~~~]~,s,9~as~~~~. ~_........~:----,~~_.oda. i FAQ ... ~ l~ ~§~ ~ ~ R~- aae t ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ .S ~ _~p~p .RA sad SS ~ , ~~ _ `, Qr ; e_~~p~kk ua:'; cfll;~i ~ ~ ~; s®~ ~~~~~~ {~ ' 6 p x p p. a C .. M s .' P z )g ~ aZ ~ 6c] ~a ~¢` ¢_ ¢A~~ ~z° Q F ~ ~3=< n L = ~ • „G .. ~ ,, c' i i ~ Y ~~~ ~~~» e<~ m 3 w J a r~ J ay '=a ',9s 9 s5 a FROM ELEVATION GLlFORNIA BUNGALOW i FACING B TI DM C'T i iR7.p IS FRONT ELEVATION NAME OF APPLICAM RANCHO NCAMONCA IAND COMPANY,LLC 106)0 CIVIC CENTER DRNE RANNO NCAMONGA, CA 91D9 PHONE (9119)98]-7718 FAX (W9) 960.1169 ETIWAI~A APARTMENTS RANCRO NC ALQ~'ORNIA FORECAST GRO c fa" ~_~ ADULT ('OMM TNTTY ('Fh~R J a n ~~ NAME OF APPLICAM RANCHO COCAMONGA LANU COMPANY, LYC 105]0 CMC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO NCAMONGA CA 9VJ0 PHONE (909198] ]]88 FAX (909) 980.1169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS RANCHO NCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA FOAECASTCROUP FRONT ELEVATION CAL/£OBNIA BUNGALOW sua.D~rrc a" d~--- LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION NAME OF APPWCANT RANNO NCAMONCA I.ANU NMPANY, LLC 10610 CMC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO NCAMONGA, CA 91)NI PHONC (909)98] )]88 FA% (909) 980.1169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS MNNO NC CAWFORNIA FY)RECAST G LEFT ELEVATION CALFORN7A BUNGALOIY "R m.DIN , B^ RIGHT ELEVATION J h LEFT ELEVATION NAME OF APPLICANT MNCHO COCAMONCA LAND COMPANY, LLC 106]0 CIVIC CFN]ER ORR'E RANCNONCAMONGA,U 91]JO PNONE (w9J 98]'N88 FAX (909) 9801169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS AANCIIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFONNIA FORRCASi GR00P FRONT ELEVATION CAIJFORNIA BUNt,,,...,,, "B TI .DIN , (", RIGHT ELEVATION ~.~..~ ~J . M ' m s NAME OF MPLICANi RANCHO CUCMIONCA LAND COMPANY, WC 106]0 CMC CENIER DRIVE RANCHO NCAMONGA. CA 91A0 PHONE (1'00)90.] ]]0.8 FAX (909) 90.0-1169 FRONT ELEVATION CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ~tiILDINC D" ~. ,..,. REAR ELEVATION ETIWANDA APARTMENTS ~_ ~~,OSN~CA~CAW PORNIA ~ --^-_~- LEFT & RIGHT ELEVATION C~ .. n ~--- 's II ~~~ II II ~-- - °Ij ~~ ~~ ~~~ II ';-_ _ o ofj ~j fi II fl ii I ~I ~ 00 #=I ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~_- - ~~ - 'D~EyI r~ ~. --~ ~ ,.~~.+ i ii ~ I , ,~ '~- ` f . ~~ __# ~~If~~ li~i z ~ ~ x ~ a~ ~~ 3~a< Vplp~p U ~F Off` ~ ps 3 ~~~~i~ 3 Z ~~R o F ~~ ~~g~ w ~e -M 7R LLL{y ~ ~ ~_ _-- rWL 0 0 P'~FA ~ ~ 4C9tN ~tifliY gr ~''~ ~D~ 1COM ¢ o')< %+} nwa C~ m_~ --~ _ ~, k~=~== AD Ti .T OMMTTNTTY R NAME OF APPLICAM RANCHO CUCMIONGA LAND COMPANY, LLG ID6RI CI VIC CENTER ORNE MNNONCAMONGA, CA 91]JD PHONE (909)%)'l7B9 FA% 19!19) 9861169 ETIWA~1 APARTMENTS ~ ~,,,_~ MNCNO CUC A).)FORNIA e FORECAST GRO ~_~_ • ~` ~I --~ ~i1~~ ~' i 4 l~ 7 ~ - h ~`CPi ~ i ___ L~1L y .. L 6 ~ ,fie t ~ r {Cyr. yy rpyp~ , IC p ~~P @ 9 ~~. n~. ~ a o t :a~_ ~.n' ~~4 p4~ 4 iC ~Ey~ ,~ I ~ii ~+~~ ~,~ ~ii~ C~. z w j ~ ~ F e ii ~ Q 3 '~ o u =~ g p., ~ d~ <~s~ ¢~ ztz°xm ~ of Q z '~ S j u ~~ ~ d u ~G~Z~ ~ .3 u~ W ~~g~z ~g M m NAMEOF APPLIGM RANNO NCAAfONCA LAND COMPANY, LLC 106)0 CNICCEMFR DRIYE MNCDONGMONGA,G 911)0 PNONE (909)99)-P98 FAX (909) 960.1169 ..Bn~ BTI~WcA APARTMENTS ~ d~..~ PANCDO NC cA, rFOnNu ~J ~,~~~~ ~~~~i~ .I. I~~fi i1:~E ~£~~J( ~~ ~~ =m ~a z~ 0 ~_ ~° a F 3 H w M- NAME OF MPLICAM MNNO NCMIONCA LAND COAIPAN$ LLC. I OfitO CI V I C CENIE0. O RI V E RANCHO NCMIONGA, CA 9iD0 PNONE (909) 96t t)86 FA% (909) 9661169 ETIWA~1 APARTMENTS MNCBO NC"CALIFORNIA FORECAST CRO `BiTILDIN . B" ~~_s _,~_ fT1 C5~ W NAME OF APPLICANF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IAND COMPANY, WC 106)0 CMC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91ZJ0 PIIONE (909198) A8R FA% (9091 980.1169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS RANCHO NCAMONCh CALIPORNU FORECASF CROUP `BUILDING B" d -M- NAME OF APPWCAM RANCHO CUGMONGA LAND COMPANY, LLC 106]0 CIVIC CENIFR DANE RANCHO NCAMONOA CA 91JJ0 PHONE (909J 98] PBB FAK (909) 980.1169 "B P .DIN . ETIWAI~',ZA APARTMENTS • /~_ RANCHO COCA ALIFVRNU PORECASF GR _.,,,, rn N NAME OF APPllCAM RANCHO NCAMONGA WND COMPAN$ 44C 195]0 CIVIC CENTER DRNE RANCHO NCAMONOAG 91]JO PNONE (909) 98] PBB FAX (909) 980.1169 "BUTT.DINC; C" ETIWANT~A APARTMENTS di~_ MNNO NCAMONCA CALIFORMA FORECAST CROUP -M rn S NAME OF APPLICAM MYCNO NCAMONGA LAND COMPANY, LLG 106]0 CMC CEMER DRMi RANCHO COCAMONGA, CA 911)0 PHONE (909) 98] TILE FA% (909) 960-1169 "R IIi.DIN , D INIT" ETIWAT~Q+ APARTMENTS ~ d~,,.,_ RANCHO NC AI.fFORNU ~ FORRCASf GRO ~ ~_ SECOND FLOOR LOFT LEVEL FIRST FLOOR ~ • - - - -- ,._~i -T~n- - -- - .~ , 1_ LOFT LEVEL d _ ~, rn N r' - - ~ 3 SECOND FLOOR L_ - - ~ -- L s _ -~---- - - - -- ~ .._.w FIRST FLOOR "BUILDING D" NAME OF APPLICANT' RANCHO CUCAMONCA LANG COMPANY, LLC 106]0 CMC CENTER ORPJE RANNONCAMONGA CA 91 ]JO PHONE (909198] ]]8B FA% 1909) 980.1169 ETIWANDA APARTMENTS MNCRO NCAMONGM CALIFORNIA rnarrpcT GROUP M' m cP a- FRONT ELEVATION _ _ , , -- -~, 1 ~ j i ` ' t i , ~ ~~ i~/ i ~ • ~ i +easmr mese a~ weeae RHe<~tiYee ` 1 ~ ~ / v~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i - . ~~ i /.. l_ ~ L ~~ t ~1L~ U 1 ~~~ ~~ i~l. i i 5-CAR GARAGE W/ H C ACCESS ARA ] .C NAME OF APPLICANT MNCHO CUCAMONGA LAND COMPANY LLC RANCHO CIICAMONOA,G 91)JO PHONE (90919A]-]>88 FA% (909) 9961169 4CAR GARAGE W/MAINTENANCE ETIWANDA APARTMEN£S d~,^,_ RANCHO CUC~CALIFORNIA ~ M ~~~ ~~ FORECASt CR _ _ FRONT ELEVATION a __ _ ~ _ _-~~T-`~ ~ ~ . r 1 i . ~ i i - i ~ ' i i ----- ---- ----- ----- ' 1 t re ee ae reeoe e p ~ n ~tx memr i ' ~. 1 i i H m cr aamr >~ ~ etreer xrex ~ , ,~ ., ~- •: NAME OF APPLICANT HANCHO CUCAMONGA LAND COMPANY, LE C 106]OCMCCENPER ORNE RANCHO NCAMONGA, CA 91]10 PHONE (909) 9B] ])Ae FA% (909) 9861169 10-CAR GARAGE -= ~ - , ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ,, ., >~ >~ ~, ,A A,_S 5-CAR GARAGE ~, ETIWANDA APARTMENTS ~~,,,_ RANCHO NCAMONCA. CALD'OM'IA iORECASP CROUP FRONT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 11:00 a.m. Kirt Coury November 20, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT 16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etwanda South Overlay District, and Etwanda Avenue Overlay District Hnthin the ELwanda SpeGfic Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION - A request to construct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etnvanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Spedfic Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda north of Foothill Boulevard -APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT 16257, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Renaval Permit DRC2001-00567. Desion Parameters: The site is located between Etrvvanda Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway, north of Foothill Boulevard. The lot is generally flat, sloping downward to the south and east. The site is currently vacant with native trees and grasses present Eight existing single-family residences, located on an inverted L-shaped properly at the central portion of the site, are not a part of the proposed project. The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commercal development. To the west and north is the I-15 Freeway. To the east across Etiwanda Avenue, is the approved, but not yet built, Camino Real Apartments by this same developer. The project density of 13.8 dwelling units per acre rs essentially at the top of the density range for this zone; therefore, transition of density to adjoining single-family homes is critipl. Site Plan has been designed to create transitions through budding orientafton and setbacks to the identified single- family residences. The protect will indude a total of 41 apartment buildings comprised of four building types. In addition, there will also be two recreation buildings with one office/leasing building. The proposed buildings fronting Etwanda Avenue have enhanced elevations and the building masses include both two-story and one-story elements to articulate the massing. There are 191wo- story apartment buildings proposed along the freeway comdor at the north and west project perimeter. The buildings are intended to assist with the mitigation of freeway noise. Single-story garage structures pertonn as a good buffer and low building mass transition along the south property line, adjacent to the commercial properly. The project will regwre a Variance to allow for the increase in the wall height up to 25 feet for sound attenuation along the I-15 Freeway. A substantial recreaton/open space conidor is provided within the development, which will indude both active and passive recreation fadlites. Active recreation uses indude a community pool and spa; several tot lots, half court basketball, grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, barbecue areas, and exerese fadlites within the recreation buildings. The proposed buildings will indude a stucco finish, painted wood corbels, wood siding, and a concrete flat tle roof. The project perimeter will involve 6-foot high tubular steel fendng and a masonry wall. Fendng along Etiwanda Avenue will indude 6-foot high tubular steel fenGng with decoratve masonry pilasters. I._.~ • DRC COMMENTS TT SUBTT16257 AND DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION November 20, 2001 Page 2 Regulations. the Etiwanda Specific Plan only allows the proposed density under the Optional Development Standards. The key requirement is a minimum of 30 percent common open space. The project site's frontage, within 200 feet of the street centerline, is located within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District The Overlay Distnct is intended "to protect and enhance the visual and histoncal character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings." The key requirement is for multi-family strudures to be designed "to present an image of large single-family structures." River rods is encouraged as a design element A minimum of 15 recreational ameni~es is required based upon the total number of units. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project 1. Roof style and matenals of the apartment buildings and garage structures should match. 2. Incorporate design elements of the proposed buildings into the architecture of the garage structures (i.e., gable roof element, stucco finish, painted wood corbels, wood siding, etc.). 3. All walls and fences shall be of decorative material. 4. Two of the proposed elevations should incorporate decorative materials other than wood siding to provide variation in the buildings. For example, Buildings B and D could indude stacked stone or real nver rock treatment 5. The decorative perimeter fence along Etiwanda Avenue shall incorporate large decorative masonry pilasters (i.e. real nver rods or stacked stone) in its design. The pilasters shall be developed at a minimum of 30 inches squared. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the proiecl design without discussion: 1. Vary the roll-up garage door designs to avoid monotony. Suggest pairing together doors with same design. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project sublecl to the modifications as recommended above. Desion Review Committee Action: Member Present Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. tGrt Coury . The Committee reviewed the project and recommended the applicant make all major and policy issue revisions, with the exception of the fourth identified major issue. The revision should incorporate decorative material other than wood siding and could indude stacked stone or real river rodk treatment on the four buildings along Etiwanda Avenue as well as the leasing/clubhouse building. The applicant agreed to make the necessary revisions and bring balk the revised elevations and sample materials. The Committee asked to see the projed on Consent Calendar at the next Design Review Committee meeting. ~ ~ r ~ ( ,~ CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 7.00 p.m. Kirt Coury December 4, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557 - FORECAST CORPORATION -A request to wnstruct 368 apartments on 26.7 acres of land m the Medwm Residential District (8-14 dwelling urnts per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distnd within the Etiwanda Speufic Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29. Related Files• Tentative Tract SUBTT 16257, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart Staff Planner. Nancy Fong for Kirt Coury The applicant was not present at the meeting with the revised colored elevations. The Committee reviewed the faxed 8 1/2 by 11 elevations showing the addition of stacked stones ennchment to Buildings B and C. The Committee recommended that the stacked stones be used as a wainscot for all sides of the buildings and to bnng the stacked stones up to the level of the comics tn:atment and as marked on the faxed elevations. If the applicant disagreed with the Committee's recommendations, the protect should be referred bads to Committee as a regular item for discussion pnor to Planning Commission review. T~~ E log •~, ~ w ~~ _ ~T s ENVIRONMENTAL ~,~ 5~ INFORMATION FORM Gtyo/RanMa cucanawa (Part I -Initial Study) PlannMD Dlvlsbn ~eoe> err-rrso INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d Is the respons~bdrfy of the eppl~cant to ensure that the appl~cabon rs complete at the dine o/ submdtal, City sta/f wdl not be evadable to peAorm work requ/red to prowde mrssng mlormadon Apphcadon Number for the pro/ect fo which fhls torn pertains ~roled Trde Name 8 Address of pro/ect ~D1ec ec ` ~ c v~^PS owner(s) (nAZ11h 1..~~ C ~e~n 1t~ t ~kck~ (~ Aw~vKO~ID. « 9~~3 O Name&Addressofdeveloperorpro/ect C~ ""'' sponsor. Contact Person & d N'^ / 1~ ' `e_ S ,} \~9 O `~ 7? ~ J~~O b Address (~ ~ 7 L) , ~ ~ ~ <ir r. lc'~ L1 t l) ~~ ~ h ~ ~ l03 Name 8 Address of person prepanng this form (d different hom above) .~ d ~`^ ~ • ~~C 1 /~ Z) ~~ ~G Telephone Number. ~l v 1 7 2 ! - Xl !1 Information indicated by astensk (') is not regwred o/nonoonsfrucbon CUP~s unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Prowde a lull scale (&12 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which Includes the project site, and mdlcate the site boundanes. ® 2) Provide a set o/color photographs which show representative wews into the site /corn the north, south, east and west; wews into and from the mte hom the pnmary access points which senre the sde; and representative wews o1 slgndtcant features from the site Include a map showing krcation of each photograph. 3) Profed Location (descnbe)~ ' -ti„ ~ ~. t 14 u ~r~ ~~ T, ~_~ 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (attach eddi6ona/ sheet H necessary)' ZZ~- zr - Corr ~n~9 .~v9 J of O o ~ p onS ail vo3) '5) Gross Site Area (eNsq tt.)• 6 . ~ ,dC~eS ~5) Net Sde Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): Z~ , 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would al/ect the pro/ed site (attach additional sheet d necessary ~~~ D~ Ely - 8J Include a descnphon o/all perinds which will be necessary from the City o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental . agencies in order to /ully implement the pmlect. p I C U r ~/1a(i1~11[? V~`s~~~.R 'L~u,ld~Kyt' 9)Descnbe the phymcal setting o/the site as d exists befog the pro/ect including in/ormabon on topography, sod stabild}; plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on sde (inducting age and condition) and the use o/ the strictures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, site all sources o)informabon (~ e, geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, trafllc studies). r~ LJ 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/or histonca/aspects of the sde. Sde all sources o/m/ormabon (books, pubbshed reports and oral history) • ~£ E cis ~ c 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, rncludmg information on plants end animals and any cultural, hisfoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of /and use (res~denbal, commerual, etc.), intensify o/land use (one-femity, apartment houses, shops, deparbnent stores, etc.) and scale of development (height Irontage, setback, rear yard, eta). M, ».,.1 ~., sta ~.cn i • 7f w ~!J a ~~v~ S7` f ~ .,eve/ ~r~.~fi~° a v,sfA_ c... ~ _ D£~~~v 11)Descnbe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway norse, etc) and how they wdl affect nTnncoil ileac 12)Descnbe the proposed protect m detail Thrs should provide an adequate descnpbon of the sde in terms o/ ufhmate use which will result from the proposed pm/ect Indicate d there ere proposed phases for development, the extent o/development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) 11 necessary. 14)~ll the proposed pro/ed change the pattern, scale or charactero/the surrounding general area of the pro/ect'I ~~ r~ 15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-term noise to be generated, rndudmg source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods o/sound pyroofi_nyg. are proposed? 1~+-a~-~rr w~ ~~ v<S-1 i r.c ll ~ ~~o ~ 5,2. . '16) Indicate proposed romovals and/or replacements o/mature or scenic trees ~~ ~v~~ T ~ ~ ~~ „ l S>.~~ ~TrE~*S 17) Indicate any bodes oI wafer (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains. ~~.wa.~~ e ~ ~.+1 ~L.vp ~G..Nn<~ 18)lndicateexpededamounto/water usage (SeaAttachmentA/orusegeeshmates) For/uRhardanficabon,pleasecontad the Cucamonga County Water Distnd of 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) ~ `I s. 2 o J Peak use (gal/Day) b Commerpa4lnd (gaUday/ec) Peak use (LgaU/mrNac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank v Sewer. I/ septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests I/discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation. (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For /urther danficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distncf at 987- 2591 a Residential (gal/day) Z Z, t) D ~ - b Commeraalllnd (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PRDJECTS: 20) Number of residential units Detached (indicate range o/parcel srzes, minimum lot size and maximum lot srze ~ ~ ~ (~~ n u Attached (mdicate whetherunds am motel or for sale unds) 21)Ant~apated range o/sale prices and/or mots Sale Price(s) S to Rent (per month) S g v ~ to 22) Speaty number o/bedrooms by unff type: 36~ l~ u~~ 1~~1-'s $ ~Z7S- ~S~ ~~~-~ i ~3a ~~~~ 1 g d caw t z. Z Q~ Z ~A~C-~ ^$~ c~A~t 3 zg~ zgt~ 23) Indicate anbapated household srze by unit type. 24)Ind~cate the expected numbero/school chlldmn who will be msidmg wdhm the pm/ed. Goofed the appropriate School Drstnds as shown m Attachment B e E/ementary~ b JumorH~gh c Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commeraal, rndustnal or uses ~ , 26) Total floor ama o/ commemral, mdustrl ~@l, or msbf al bges by I I i type 27) Indicate hours o/operation to be Aired that 28) Numbero/ employees: Total Maximum Shdt. Time of Maximum Shdt 29JPmwde breakdown of anhcrpated/ob classrficahons, m of hire /or each class~ficahon (attach add~donal sheet d 30) Eshmahon o/the CdY • '31) For commerce/ and venfied through the ALL PROJECTS rrar uses Coast Ar 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and tic adequate service to the proposed and salary ranges, as well as an indication o/the rate reside m the type and emou t o/errpollut~on missrons (Data should be nct, at (818) 5 2-6283) condo) egences serving the pm/ect been contacted to detemurre their ability to provide ~ed7 l1 so, please rnd~cate their response -p~ E ln~i In the known history o/ this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals9 33)~amples of hazardous and/ortoxic matenals rndude, but are not limited to PCBs, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbiades, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known Nfj 34) ill the proposed pro/ed involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not I~mited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown end labeled on the appbcabon plans. 1 hereby certify that the statements famished above and m the attached exhibds present the data and in/ormabon mquned for adequate evaluation of this proled fo the best of my abildy, that the facts, statements, and rnlormahon presented are hue and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that add~6onal rnformabon may be required to be submitted before an adequate eva/uatron can be made by the City of Rancho `___'-'°' Date `r signature. rlae• ~£ E1o City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: DRC 2001-00557 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map No 16257, DRC 2001-00567 and DRC 2001-0566 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Review 2001- 00557-The protect is the development and design review of plans for Tentative Tract Map No 16257, and the construction of 368 multi-family units m buildings ranging from one to three stones m height. The site is approximately 26 7 acres m the Medwm Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan The protect also requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Tree Removal Permit The protect site is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract All proposed developments within the overlay distract are subtect to the issuance of a CUP with the exception of single-family residences The Tree Removal Permit will allow the removal of onsite trees that meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size cntena for heritage trees Currently there are three single-family residences onsite The proposed protect includes the removal of these residences The site is located southeast of the elevated I-15 Freeway, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard and immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue (APN Nos 227-21-003, 004, 005, 009, 010, 017, 020 and 029) 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Forecast Corporation 10670 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan 6. Zoning: Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is bordered on the west and north by the I-15 Freeway. The freeway is elevated through this section and runs southwest to northeast at an approximate 45° angle to the site. The area south of the site is vacant followed by a realty office, a liquor store, single-family residences and a church (located near the southwest corner of the site) The site surrounds an existing neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences. These are not a part of the protect and will remain m place. The protect includes a perimeter wall around the existing residents There are three single-family residences that occur onsite that will be removed to allow for site development The westernmost portion of the site is currently clear of residential structures and will allow full access to the northem/southern portion of the site r1 L.J 'p~~~l Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kart Coury Senior Planner (909) 477-2750 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 10. Other agencies whose approval is required. State Water Resources Control Board - General Construction Activities Storm Water Runoff Permit. ~p~E~a Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, Involving at least one Impact that is °Potentlally Significant Impact," "Potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or 'Less Than Significant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) Transportation/Circulation ()Land Use and Planrnng (/) Public Services (/) Biological Resources (~ Population and Housing ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Utilities and Service Systems ( )Geological Problems (/) Hazards (/) Aesthetics (/) Water (/) Noise ()Cultural Resources (/) Air Quality / Mandato Findin s of Si mficance (/) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the . project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed• Natalie P. Patty Contract Environmental Anal st December 18, 2001 p~ E ~3 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all °Potentially Significant Impact,° °Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° and "Less Than Signrficant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified PdaMleny Sl~ffieanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paamie0y im~'bss~ 9gnificant Minganan Slgn~ficaM No I p Inw tad I p I a LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? () () () (~) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (~) pollees adopted by agencies with tunsdiction over the protect c) Be incompatible with existing land use m the () () () (~) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (r) established community Comments• a-b) The protect site is located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and is bordered on the wesUnorthwest by the I-15 within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The protect site is v~nthm the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract and therefore is subtect to a CUP and all special design regwrements contained m Part II, Chapter 5, Section 304 of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan The site ~s within the Medium Residential Distract (8 to 14 dwelling units per area). The applicant has proposed a tract map showing 13 8 dwelling units per acre on a net site area of 26.7 acres. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no impacts will result from the protect c-d) The nearest residence is located 40 feet from a proposed building with a proposed height of 32 feet. Standard two-story homes have heights ranging from 25 to 35 feet. The proposed development will be compatible with existing residences m the vicinity as the building are sufficiently setback from the existing residences and do not exceed the maximum height requirements of a two-story single-family home. PdentlaAy Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pmantlaly u~%u inao Sgnificant Mrtlganan SIpNf~cant No I p Ineo tail I q 1 p 2. POPULATION AND FIOUSNCz Would the proposal. a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population protections O O O (~) ~J r1 L.,J ~p~ ~ 7'~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Pde«alty Sig,uficant ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources. P«ant~auy u b ~ Than SipnlficaM Mingatlon Significant Na 1 « Into tea 1 « I « b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (~) directly or indirectly (e.g., through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () (~) ( ) housing Comments: a-b) The protect includes the construction of 368 apartments on approximately 26.7 acres of land designated as Medium Residential (8 to 14 dwelling units per area) located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 100 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed. Therefore, the protect will not result in a change in population protections The proposed protect will not require the expansion of any mator infrastructure as the area surrounding the site is development with scattered single-family residences, with commercial development along Foothill Boulevard c) The protect site includes three existing single-family residences. These residences will be removed to allow site development. The site surrounds an existing neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences. These eight residences are not apart of the protect and will remain in place. The three residential structures that occur onsite will be removed and replaced with 368 dwelling units. The impact is considered less than significant Potentially Spn~ficent Impact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources P«animlty Unless roan SpnificaM Miogalwn S~gndranl No I « Into led Im « I q 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) b) c) d) e) f) 9) Fault ruptures ( ) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions ( ) Seiche hazards ( ) Landslides or mudflows~ ( ) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil ( ) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill Subsidence of the land O U ~ft~S h) Expansive soils () () (~) O (~) ( ) () (~) ( ) O O (~) () () (~) (~) O ( ) O O (~) O O (~) Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 aaentbiy s~enfi~m ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources c«e~nreiy ~,e un r spnRicent Mrtigalion signHicant No 1 C In IaE I e I q I) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (~) Comments• a-b) No known faults pass through the site, and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor us it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Faun, passes within 3 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 8 miles north The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude (M,,,) 6.0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of produang up to M„, 7.5 earthquakes is 9 0 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M,,, 8.2 earthquakes, is 11.5 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhenng to the City grading standards and the Unrform Budding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant. c) In the absence of shallow groundwater, the protect site is not considered susceptible to soil liquefaction d) The 26 7-acre site is not located near a body of water. Therefore the proposed development will not expose people to a seiche hazard. e) The site is relatroely flat, therefore there is no danger of landslides or mudflows. Grading will be minimal and will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f) Based on a Preliminary Geotechmcal Investigation Report prepared for the site by Converse Consultants in August 2001, the protect site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the findings and conclusions presented in the report are considered in the development of the site As discussed in the report, the upper three to four feet of alluvial sods are not considered swtable for supporting structures or additional fills. However, typically, dunng grading, these sods can be over excavated and compacted to meet or exceed foundation requirements. The following mitigation measures, as contained in the report, will ensure impacts to development of the site are less than signrficant. Site grading shall include removal and recompaction of surface soils. Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineer in a final geotechnical report. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits for the project, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendations contained in the final geotechnical report. g/h) Based on the Preliminary Geotechmcal Investigation Report prepared by Converse Consultants in August 2001, two representative samples from the top layer of jJ~ E l~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 alluvial deposit were tested to evaluate expansion index (EI) in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC, 1997) Standard 18-2 The value of the measured EI is 0 This value of EI indicates that the site sods have very low expansion potential. As discussed in the report, the average shrinkage factor for the upper five feet of alluvial sods is estimated to be 2 to 16 percent Subsidence will depend on the construction methods including type of equipment utilized. For estimation purposes, ground subsidence may be taken as 0 20 feet. Subsidence may occur in the City relative to groundwater withdrawals, if groundwater drawn down is done at varying rates in the Cucamonga groundwater basin However, to date this phenomenon has not occurred anywhere in the City and is unlikely to occur due to the consistent groundwater management practices of the various water agencies. Therefore, this impact is considered to be less than signrficant. • Sod type at the site and in the vicinity is Tulunga association (Tv6). The Tulunga series consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping sods formed on alluvial fans in granitic alluvium Soils are present at slopes of zero to nine percent in elevations ranging from 1,000 to 2,000 feet. Vegetation present with these sods is thin strands of chamise, some large sagebrush, and annual grasses Runoff is slow to very slow The hazard of water erosion is slight, but the sod will blow if left unprotected. The hazard of sod blowing is moderate to high on bare soil. The City's General Plan indicates that most sod types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature. The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Polmlielty Significenl Impart Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pdenaelly Unless Than Sigmfieenl Mmpetron Significenl No Im h Into alatl I ecl Im n 4. WATER. Will the proposal result gyn. a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () (~) ( ) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () ( ) (~) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () (~) ( ) ( ) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () ( ) (~) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () ( ) (~) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () ( ) (~) . through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ~~~77 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 caem~ely Spnificant p Issues and Supporting Inforinatlon Sources• aaanroly un~ .n; Siptlficent Mnpeeon Sxpufiwm No I h Into teC Im p Im C g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater's () () () (~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (~) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (~) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments• a-b) Based on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM, 1984) prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the protect site is located within a "Flood Hazard Zone C' This zone is defined by FEMA as an area of minimal flooding. As described in the Preliminary Drainage Study prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates the protect site drains southerly to Foothill Boulevard, through the Foothill Market Place, and ultimately to the Day Creek Channel. The City's Master Plan of Drainage proposed to redirect this area easterly to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Channel. Interim conditions do not allow additional flows to the facility until downstream regional facilities are completed. In addition, the property is not physically capable of draining to the basin. A Final Drainage Report prepared for Tract 15711(located north of the protect site) in September 1997, provides for the redirection of the undeveloped runoff from this area, with mitigation detention occurring in Basin No. 6 to account for this increased undeveloped flow. The report suggests onsite detention of the incremental developed runoff from this area to occur as a potential option. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented prior to issuance of grading permits. 3. The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how stormwater will be conveyed across the site and directed into the City's storm drain system. c-e) Since grading onsite will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The protect will also require a General Construction Activity Storm Water Runoff Permit from the SWRCB. Both the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or stormwater conveyance channels. BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant: 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. u r~ p~E~tFf Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 A final grading plan will be prepared m accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both dunng construction and operation. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the protect by the Budding Official to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified m the SWPPP will make this impact less than significant. f-Q The protect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Additionally, groundwater was not encountered m any of the bonngs (maximum explored depth of 50 feet) taken for the preparation of the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, prepared by Converse Consultants. Based on available information depth to groundwater is greater than 400 feet below the protect site. C~ Poleniblly Sgruficenl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenlwlly un~ie'u 71uHn SigniHCHnI MiopHHOn Slgn~ficent No I CI Into 818E 1 C I d 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal. a) Violate any air quality standard or contnbute to () (r) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () (r) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (r) cause any change m climate? d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (r) Comments: a) The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the gwdance of the San Joagwn Valley Unrfied Air Pollution Control Distract, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distract, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects. The cntena pollutants screened for mcluded• reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM~o) Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Instdute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6"' edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model fn order to reflect the residential nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of light passenger vehicles and decrease the number of medium and heavy-duty diesel trucks The proposed protect operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of signrficance (Table 2). However, since the South Coast Air Basin is m non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contnbution to regional emission of cntena pollutants. u £ t ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds dunng grading activities for PM,o and NO„ nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented. Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated. Additionally, painting actvities will increase ROG levels. The model simulates all of the units being painted at the same time (worst case) and shows that combined ROG dunng construction to exceed the 75 pounds per day threshold by 1.68 pounds. However, it is likely that painting activities will be spaced out and will not occur at the same time. If painting activities do occur simultaneously Mitigation Measure No 11 will ensure emissions are below SCAQMD thresholds. And since, there are existing residential units within the wcinity of the site, and since the region is innon-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust will be mitigated by the following measures: 5. Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of 80 days. 6. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance wkh SCAQMD Rule 403. 7. Etiwanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 8. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 9. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAt]MD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Dunng operation exhaust emissions from trucks and employees traveling to the site will increase CO levels in the area As shown in Table 2, operation actvities at the site will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Based on a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Kunzman Assoaates in October 2001, the protect will generate approximately 2,466 daily taps Total AM peak hour taps would be approximately 139 and PM peak hour taps would be 169, with a continued LOS D capacity or better at intersections in the vicinity. Traffic assocated with the protect was protected to occur in the area as the area is designated Medwm Residential and is expected to generate related traffic trips. Emissions assocated with these vehicle taps are below SCAQMD thresholds (Table 2) ~~ E~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Dav) Source ROG NO^ CO PM,a Unmet. Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet Met Unmet. Mit. Demolition - - - - - - 16 80 16.80 Gradin 4.67 4 67 53.22 50 56 - - 25.36 10.99 Worker Tn s 1 09 1.09 1.54 1.54 2 91 2.91 0 29 0 29 Stations E ui 034 034 0 27 0.27 - - 0 02 0.02 Mobile E ui 3.12 2.96 28.80 27 36 - - 2.23 2 12 Arch Coatm s 69.72 66 23 - - - - - - As halt 1.70 1 62 - - - - - - Totals 80.64 76 68 83.83 79.73 2.91 2 91 44.70 13.42 SCAOMDThres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nificance Yes Yes No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G EXISTING Operations Emissions (Pounds per Dav) Source ROG NO, CO PM,o Unmet Mit. Unmet. Mit. Unmet. Mrt Unmet Mrt Area Source 0.06 0 00 0.81 0 00 0.32 0 00 0 00 0.00 Mobile Source 10.16 10.16 20 29 20 29 90.46 90.46 5.16 5.16 Totals 10.22 10 16 21 10 20.29 90 78 90 46 5.16 5 16 SCAOMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No b) Dunng construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and egwpment, and fugitive dust generated by egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO. and PM,o levels in the area. The following mitigation measures wtll ensure impacts to existing residential units located a minimum of 40 feet from proposed construction activities, are at less than significant levels. 10. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 11. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 12. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. ~~~4s1 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 c-d) The proposed prolect is the construction of 368 apartment units on a 26.7-acre lot with demolition of three existing residential units in accordance with the City code The end use of the proposed prolect, Medium residential, will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors Patmllally Spnficem Issues and Supporting Information Sources roleln~euy u~~ may Sipnificent MmpBiwn SIpNfiCeM No ~ n Into eteA I n I n 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result ~n: a) Increased vehicle taps or traffic congestions () (~) () ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., () () () (r) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm egwpment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (r) nearby uses d) Insuffiaent parking capacty on-site or off-site? () () () (~) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? () () () (~) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (r) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O O (~) Comments• a) A traffic study was prepared for the prolect by Kunzman Associates in October 2001 The study contains documentation of existing traffic conditions, traffic generated by the prolect, distribution of the prolect traffic to roads outside the prolect, and an analysis of future traffic conditions. The followin g is a summary of the traffic study prepared for the prolect. Roadways that will be utilized by the development include Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. Currently the prolect site is vacant with the exception of three single-family residences that generate minimal traffic. Existing intersections in the vicinity of the site currently operate at Level of Service (LOS) D capacity or better. Once constructed, the prolect would generate approximately 2,466 daily taps. Total AM peak hour trips would be approximately 139 and PM peak hour taps would be 169, with a continued LOS D capacty or better at intersections in the vicinity These traffic generation levels are below the San Bernardino County Association of Governments threshold of 250 peak hour taps to require a Congestion Management Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (CMPlTIA). The following mitigation measures contained in the traffic study will ensure impacts to traffic and roads in the wanity are at less than signdicant levels: J pf ~~ ~- Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 13. Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking and controlling roadway access. 14. Construct all streets internal to the project to full ultimate cross-sections as adjacent development occurs. 15. Construct all streets bordering the project to ultimate half-section widths in conjunction with development. 16. Landscape planting and signs should be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility. 17. Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adjacent arterials. The applicant will be responsible for paying the City traffic impact fees and improving the protect's frontage along Etiwanda Boulevard. The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the protect's fair share of roadway improvements as identified by the City Engineer. b-c) Protect design will not result in the creation of hazardous traffic conditions or create dangerous intersections The proposed protect includes two full access points from Foothill Boulevard The southernmost access point is the main gated entrance and includes a 22-foot entrance and a 20-foot exit, with an eight-foot island separating the two. The second gated entrance is located approximately 700 feet north of the main entrance and includes both a 20-foot entrance and exit, with an eight-foot island separating the two. Both entrances will provide adequate points of ingress/egress and are accessible by emergency vehicles. d) The proposed protect must provide a total of 712 parking spaces. The site plan includes 719 parking spaces e-f) The new facility will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists because adequate points of ingress/egress have been provided and there is adequate parking along streets. No bus turnout has been provided g) Located approximately seven miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. aolenmlry Sigrufiranl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pme~nreny u~iass `~ 9pmficenl MitlgaM1On Spndvam No Im C Inco eletl Im C I ecl 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) D~~83 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 ~~~ ~~~ Issues and Supponing Information Sources Pa~~wy ~~a m~ srenirx.m Mngenm sgninum r» i a i ~aa i i a b) Locally designated speces (e.g., heritage trees, () () (~) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural commuroties (e.g., () () () (~) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and () () () (~) vernal pool) e) Wddlrfe dispersal or migration corndors~ () () () (~) Comments: a) The site and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997 The 26.7-acre site contains three residential units within the easternmost area and a vineyard within the westernmost area The site is mostly vegetated with non-native grasses, a vineyard, and windrows of eucalyptus trees. Past agricultural and residential development has eliminated native vegetation at this site. b-c) According to the Arbonst Report prepared by Jim Borer, Cert'rfied Arbonst for the project site on September 20, 2001, a total of 86 trees on site meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size criteria for heritage trees There are 72 eucalyptus of various specmens and types, ten Italian cypress, one fan palm, one frwtless mulberry, and two California peppers. In general the eucalyptus trees are quite mature and are in declining condition with 13 dead specmens Many of the other specmens are under going structural decline One eucalyptus tree is under attack from an insect that has caused d to defoliate and therefore decline. The eucalyptus trees vary m condition between extremely mature specimens and smaller specmens that have grown underneath the canopies of the larger trees. Trees in both categories are in decline. Based on the proposed site development plan that calls for mass grading operations and widening of the west side of Etiwanda Avenue frontage, all of the existing specimen trees on site are expected to be affected Up to 75 of the 86 trees on site must be removed to allow for the proposed grading to accommodate construction. As stated in the report, several of the species are candidates for relocation Ornamental trees onsite, including one fan palm and 10 Italian cypress trees are viable candidates for relocation and preservation onsite. However none of these 11 trees are individually mature or distinct in either form or character and it would not be considered a signficant impact rf the trees were removed. The applicant has applied for the necessary Tree Removal Permit and has paid all assoaated fees The impact is not considered significant as a majority of the trees are in declmmg condition and the project design indicates that they will be replaced with 120, 36-inch box trees, 120, 24-inch box trees, and 962, 15-gallon trees for a total of 1,202 new trees onsite r~ u L._J p~~~`{ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 d) There is no nparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The I-15 Freeway borders the site along the west and northwest. The site is immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. Scattered single-family residences occur near and on the site This development has eliminated any wildlife corndors that may have occurred m the past. aaammuy Spllficenl Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Paeamlly 11i,°~ ~ Sipificant Mlipabon Spnificenl No I a I IeE I q 1 q 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () ( ) () (~) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (~) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (~) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments• a-b) The protect will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The protect site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization aaeawly Signficant Issues and Supporting Information Sources vaea~euy u~ss ina Sgn~iamt Mitlgaeon Sign~firanl No I q In IeE I a 1 a 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (~) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to. oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (~) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (~) health hazard p~ ~~S Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Potentmlry lificanl Si Issues and Supporting Information Sources aaentielry ¢ ~; r Sipnifirant Mitlpelbn Sipnifiauil No I a 1 61etl 1 a I a d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (~) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (~) brush, grass, or trees Comments• a) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses No evidence of discarded drums, containers, or hazardous wastes were observed during a site visit. Several piles of non-hazardous debris were observed onsite and will be removed prior to grading There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. Past and current uses at and near the site include vineyard and residential development. Demolition of residential structures shall be done in accordance with applicable City regulations The proposed protect will not expose people or the environment to hazardous materials b) Two 50-foot driveways along Etiwanda Avenue will provide adequate access for emergency vehicles for the 26.7-acre site. Fire hose locations will be approved per the Fire Department. All terminating streets on-site provide appropriate tum radii for emergency vehicles. d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils was observed onsite There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. e) Development of the sites will remove dry vegetation and continued development of the area will decrease the potential of fire within the vicinity The site is not located in a brush/wildland fire hazard area. aaea~elry s~lunrem Issues and Supporting Information Sources- roleaellr ~; ma Spnifiaun MN~fion SIly~ificam No I a Inm eteE I a I a 10. NOISE. Wtll the proposal result in. a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (~) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? () (~) () ( ) Comments: • a) The proposed protect consists of 368 units in four building ranging in height between one and three stories. The single and two-story buildings will house conventional apartments, while the building with three stories will include loft style apartments on the third floor. The protect would increase noise levels on-site and in the vicinity because the site is currently vacant. The site surrounds an existing ~~ ~~~ ~, L_J Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 neighborhood that includes eight single-family residences that are not a part of the protect, and that will remain in place Construction actroities are short-term and related elevated noise levels will cease once construction is complete. Implementation of the City's standard regulations on construction noise will ensure impacts to these residential units are at less than significant levels These include limiting hours of construction to day-time hours Monday through Friday. Protect-related increases in noise associated with developing a vacant site with 366 multi-family units will be consistent with the City's General Plan Noise Element for multi-family protects. The protect is not antiapated to generate other than residential noise (i.e., children playing, vehicles entering and exiting, landscape maintenance, etc.) Construction noise can be mitigated through adherence to the City's regwrements for restricting noise including delimiting the hours and days when construction can occur. Also the placement of stockpile areas and egwpment storage away from the existing residences adfacent to the protect site. These conditions of protect approval are adequate so that no additional mitigation measures are required b) The 368 apartment units will be sited immediately east of the elevated I-15 freeway and west of Etiwanda Avenue Traffic along freeways and highways can be a significant source of noise The City's General Plan indicates noise levels exceeding 65 dBA along the 115 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue. The protect site is located 550 feet from Foothill Boulevard which is also subject to noise levels exceeding 65 dBA . Environmental noise is normally measured using a special frequency-dependent rating scale because the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies. The A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) compensates for this discrepancy by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. A-weighting de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequencies of sound in a manner similar to the human ear. The result is a decbel corrected for the variation infrequency response of the typical human ear at commonly encountered noise levels. In general, people can perceive athree-dBA difference in noise levels; a difference of 10 dBA is perceived as being twice as loud; 20 d6 higher four times as loud, and so forth Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dB (very quiet) to 100 dB (very loud) Environmental noise levels typically fluctuate over time, and different types of noise descriptors are used to account for this variability. The most useful noise descriptors measure time-averaged noise levels representing various times of the day as sensitivity to noise increases/decreases (sensitivity to noise increases during evening and night-time hours). The following are definitions of the terminology commonly used to describe noise and noise related impacts CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) -The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24hour period, obtained after addition of approximately five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m to 10.00 p.m. and ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10.00 p m and before 7:00 a m. -D~ ~ 8" I Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 dB(A) (A-Weighted Sound Pressure Level) -The sound pressure level, m decibels, as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound, placing greater emphasis on those frequenaes within the sensitivity range of the human ear Ldn (Day-Night Noise Level) -The average egwvalent A-weighted sound level dunng a 24-hour day obtained by adding ten decibels to the hourly noise levels measured dunng the night (from 10 p m to 7 a.m.). In this way Ldn takes into account the lower tolerance of people for noise dunng nighttime periods. Leq (Egwvalent Energy Level) -The sound level corresponding to a steady- state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over a given sample penod, typically 1, 8 or 24 hours LM„ (Maximum Sound Level) - A statistical value that represents the highest maximum sound level reading dunng a given penod. A traffic noise study report was prepared for the proposed 368-unit protect using both City and State of California noise standards The Crty's Nose Element regwres that where exceeded, the exterior noise adiacent to residential uses must be mitigated to 65 CNEL for outside living areas and that mtenor noise from exterior noise sources be mitigated to 45 CNEL for indoor living areas In addition, the state's criteria for implementing surface traffic noise controls from the Noise Abatement Cntena (NAC) established by the Federal Highway Administration are 65 dBA leq for exterior residential areas and 52 dBA leq for mtenor areas. Under state regulations, highway traffic noise must be mitigated when the predicted noise levels "approach or exceed" the NAC or when predicted noise levels substantially exceed existing ambient noise levels and it is reasonable and feasible to mitigate For the noise study, two sound level monitoring systems were used at two sites within the protect boundary over a 24-hour penod. In addition, short-term noise measurements were taken at three locations to assist m defining the traffic noise propagation on-sde. Both the momtonng results and the noise prediction model show that noise due to current traffic on the I-15 freeway exceeds 65 CNEL at the freeway right-of-way property line. Predictions show that traffic noise due to Foothill Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue does not exceed 65 CNEL at the respective property Imes. According to traffic information provided by the City, future traffic noise from both Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 freeway will increase, while traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard will remain essentially the same. r 1 LJ fijf~8~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 For protect apartments along the westerly property Imes closest to the I-15 freeway, no "outdoor living areas" are planned for either the sides or the rear of these buddmgs. They have been designed to serve as 31-foot high by 61 feet long noise barriers for the rnterior buldings on-site Without these buddmgs to act as sound barriers for the I-15 traffic, noise would be approximately 65 CNEL 1,236 feet from the centerline of the freeway With the noise mitigation provided by these buddmgs, freeway traffic noise would not exceed 65 CNEL m the outdoor living areas past the noise barrier apartments, except for the central portion of the freeway right-of-way where no barrier buldings are planned. For the patios and balconies with a full or partial wew of the I-15 freeway through the unmitigated central right-of-way portion of the protect, mitigation must be bwlt into the protect to reduce noise levels to 65 CNEL or less. Likewise, for units along Etiwanda Avenue, traffic noise at the front of the buildings wdl be a combination of unmitigated traffic noise from Etiwanda and mitigated I-15 traffic noise, which would be approximately 65 CNEL 116 feet from the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue Since Etiwanda Avenue traffic noise would exceed the City's noise standards, the following mitigation is required to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 CNEL or below 18. A seven-foot high, 5/8-inch thick, solid Lexan (or an equivalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of-way that have a full or partial view of the I-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of Etiwanda Avenue. Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise barriers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City. As described m the noise analysis, the worst-case exterior noise exposure would occur at the second floor of the bwldmgs nearest to the freeway and Etiwanda Avenue. The overall noise levels at the roadway facing sides of the front Ime apartments would be approximately 75 CNEL along the freeway and 69 CNEL along Etiwanda Avenue. An outdoor-to-indoor noise reduction of 30 d6 and 26 d6, respectively, wdl be requred to comply with the 45 CNEL mtenor noise level target. The following mitigation measure wdl ensure mtenor noise levels at within City standards. 19. An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the design to provide ventilation for the units without requiring that windows be opened. The type of ventilation system will be chosen in consultation with City staff prior to issuance of building permits. 20. First floor apartment windows in buildings walls that would have a full or partial view of either the I-15 freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated windows. The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. b~ C~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 21. Buildings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either the I-15 freeway or Etiwanda, will require the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors. The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building permits for the affected buildings. PolanbBAy SgNficent Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pwentle~lr ImpaC um.ss Leas m.A Sgnificont Mpipebon $gNfManl No ImpACI Inmrporetetl IrtpOq Irtpecl 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an ef/ect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas• a) Fire protection? () () () (~) b) Police protection? () () () (~) c) Schools? () () (~) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () (~) ( ) e) Other governmental services? () () () (~) Comments• The Etiwanda Specific Plan identifies the prolect area as one of the highest intensities within the Etiwanda planning area The area is planned to contain one of the higher land use intensities Appropriate conditions of approval will be placed on the prolect prior to development a-e) Fire Protection -The prolect site is located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, and is served by the Foothill Fire Protection District. The nearest fire station is located on Baseline Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard, and approximately two miles northwest of the site The Foothill Fire Distnct is responsible for evaluating the prolect through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process The proposed prolect will include structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Police protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sherrff's Department. The proposed residential development will include standard security devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and doors. Since a portion of the site contains existing residential units, with commercial development occurring less than 550 feet south of the project site, the area is currently patrol and will not required additional police protection Schools -The Etiwanda School Distnct and the Chaffey Joint High School District serve the prolect area A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered sign"rficant. • r~ I~ p~ ~ 5~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Parks -The proposed project will include recreational facilities onsite for the 368 dwelling units. Facilities will mclude a Main Recreational Building, an Adult Recreation Center, and a Family Recreation Center. Additional amenities mclude• a tot lot for ages 2-5, a children's wading pool, a tot lot for ages 5-12, a pool and spa, half-court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, and four barbecue/picnic facilities. Since the prolect provided several recreational amenities onsite, the impact to local parks or future recreational opportunities is less than significant. b) Public facilities -The proposed residential development will not significantly increase traffic on adjacent streets and it is consistent will the City's Etiwanda Specific Plan which designates the area Medium Residential with projected future traffic after development. The project includes improvements along Etiwanda Avenue right-of-way. Additionally, the proponent will be required to construct all other necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. Potenmlry Sgruficani Issues and Supporting Information Sources agentuoy un~iass :ne Sigruficent Mifipafion Sgnifium No 1 q Inro raced I q I eq 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? () () () (~) b) Communication systems () () () (~) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (~) facihties~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (~) e) Storm water drainage? () () (~) ( ) f) Solid waste disposals () () () (~) g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (~) Comments: a-g) The proposed project will include the construction of 368 dwelling units The proposed development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area. The area, as discussed within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, is scheduled to include one of the higher relative land use intensities within the planning area. Utility systems installed to service existing development within the area, are adequate and will not require major modifications or alterations. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. e) The project will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site A bf~~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Preliminary Drainage Report prepared for the protect by Dan Guerra & Associates indicated that existing Basin Number 6 be excavated to accommodate additional capacity. This will allow development to occur, not increase runoff to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Channel and eliminate the adversity associated with onsite detention. Drainage Plans will be included in application submittals in addition to the Final Drainage Report for City Engineer review and approval. See Section 4, Water for a discussion of Best Management Practices. Pdedblly S~~ficenl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pa.,tmly ue~ ,Lne"ee Sgndxant tAtpatwn SpnRlced No I a Inw tea I a I a 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (~) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (~) c) Create light or glare? () () () (~) Comments: a-b) The protect site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway The area is designated Medium Residential development within the Etiwanda Specific Plan The proposed protect will blend with current and proposed surrounding development. The protect site is within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay Distract. With the exception of single-family residences, all other proposed development within the overlay district is subtect to the issuance of the CUP In addition to applying for a CUP, it is the intent of the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District to protect and enhance the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue by requiring special setbacks, traditional architectural styles, and landscaping to be consistent with the streetscape theme for Etiwanda Avenue. The proposed protect includes aesthetically pleasing elevations with large open space area and the replacement of declining trees with 1,202 new trees. c) The protect will create new light and glare as the site is currently vacant. However, the site has been identrfied as a residential site so new light will not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as other residential development in the area Pdeneely SlpnMranl Impea Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources• Paeonellr Unleas roan Spuecent Mitpelion Sgnifxad No I a I tee I a I a 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources b) Disturb archaeological resources c) Affect historical or cultural resources O O O (~) U O O (~) O O O (~) pf ~~a Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 amemeny slnnlnr~m Issues and Supporting Information Sources• Pa«n~ly u~~ m Signdranl Mitipetlon Slpnificem No I cl I ateE I h 1 Ct d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses within O O O (~) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources. The site is located in a developing residential area and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the protect site. • aaentbny Sipnifitonl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pa~oy lun~i.,," r~n"'an Sipnficanl Mngatlan SIIAnfirent No I ct In etaE 1 a 1 ed 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal• a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () (~) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities O O O (~) Comments: a) The proposed protect will include recreational facilities onsite for the 368 dwelling units. Recreational facilities will include a Main Recreational Budding, an Adult Recreation Center, and a Family Recreation Center Additional amenities include: a tot lot for ages 2-5, a children's wading pool, a tot lot for ages 5-12, a pool and spa, half-court basketball, a grass volleyball court, horseshoe pit, and four barbecue/picnic facilities. Since the protect provides several recreational amenities onsite, the impact to local parks or future recreational opportunities is less than signrficant. b) The proposed protect will be constructed on land that contains three existing residential units, and is designated Medium Residential. Surrounding and adjacent land are also designated residential or commercial and are either currently developed, being developed or proposed for development. LJ ~ ~ ~~(3 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Pmentlely SipniOCant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pa~.ly un~ieum `1n Spnlfieenl MnIp9COn Sipnificem No Im n In eteA I ad I m 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the () () (r) ( ) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Calrfornia history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () () (r) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () (~) () are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable° means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () (~) () ( ) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identrfied within Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997 The 26 7-acre site contains three residential units within the easternmost area and a vineyard within the westernmost area. The site is mostly vegetated with non-native grasses, a vineyard, and windrows of eucalyptus trees Past agricultural and residential development has eliminated native vegetation at this site. According to the Arborist Report prepared for the protect site on September 20, 2001, a total of 86 trees on site meet the Tree Ordinance's minimum size criteria for heritage trees. There are 72 eucalyptus of various specimens and types, ten Italian ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 cypress, one fan palm, one frwtless mulberry, and two California peppers. In general the eucalyptus are quite mature and are in declining condition and 13 specimens are dead Many of the other specimens are under going structural decline One eucalyptus tree is under attack from an insect that has caused it to defoliate and therefore decline The eucalyptus trees vary in condtion between extremely mature speamens and smaller speamens that have grown underneath the canopies of the larger trees. Trees in both categories are in decline. Based on the proposed site development that calls for mass grading operations and widening of the west side of Etiwanda Avenue frontage, all of the existing specimen trees on site are expected to be grossly impacted. Therefore 75 of the 86 trees on site must be removed to allow for the proposed grading to accommodate construction. As stated within the report, several of the species are candidates for relocation. Ornamental trees onsite, including one fan palm and 10 Italian cypress are viable candidates for relocation and preservation onsite However none of these 11 trees are indroidually mature or distinct in either from or character and it would not be considered a significant impact if the trees were removed. The developer has acquired the necessary Tree Removal Permit and has paid all associated fees The impact is not considered significant as a malonty of the trees are in declmmg condition and the protect design indicates they wdl be replaced with 120, 36-inch box trees, 120, 24-inch box trees, and 962, 15-gallon trees for a total of 1,202 new trees onsite. b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality and noise with development of the protect site The short-term impacts wdl occur due to proposed construction activities However, the impacts wdl cease once construction activities are completed. Implementation of mitgation measures presented in this Initial Study will reduce short-term impacts to less than signfcant. c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of bwldout in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that wdl be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred. c) Development of 368 apartments would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identified construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. However, proposed mitigation measures wtll reduce impacts to less than significant. bf~~5 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00557 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality are short-term and will cease once construction activities are completed. A noise study was prepared for the protect to identify traffic noise levels at the protect site. The report indicated that the I-15 Freeway would be the dominate noise impact for the area. The noise model in conjunction with the onsite nose measurements indicated that the budding face for the first row of apartments along the freeway would be exposed to noise levels as high as 79 2 CNEL, and that the entire site experiences noise levels greater than 65 CNEL The first row of apartments along Etiwanda Avenue would be exposed to a maximum traffic noise level of about 67.2 CNEL. The exterior living areas in the project must comply with the City's 65 CNEL Mitigation measure contained in the report are preliminary and are contained in this Initial Study. A final report shall be prepared to finalize findings and measures prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, the project must comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL. As previously stated, the first row of buildings along the I-15 will experience noise levels as high as 79.3 CNEL. This will require outdoor to indoor noise reductions of 34.2 d6 to achieve the indoor noise standard. This is a substantial level of noise reduction to achieve. Windows facing the freeway should be small and will need to be upgraded with a high noise rating The exact rating of window will depend on the size and other elements A final noise analysis must be prepared to address the interior noise levels prior to the issuance of buildings permits. The second row of buildings along I-15 will experience noise levels as high as 73 CNEL. This will requre outdoor to indoor noise reductions of 28 d6 High noise rating windows will be required for these unts. The rating of window depends on size and other elements. The first row of bwldings will experience noise levels of about 67 CNEL A noise reduction of 22 d6 will meet the City's standards Window and other buildings upgrades will not likely be required for these units ~_.J ~~~ -l~0 n LJ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00557 Page 27 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed m an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identrfied above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized m completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): • Etiwanda Speafic Plan EIR (Certified 1983) • Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (October 2001) • Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (adopted December 7, 1983, revised June 1999) • United States Fish & Wildlife, Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-lowng Fly, Figure 6, September 14, 1997 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certrfy that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur /J Signature• ( Date. ~ 3 ~ 0 ~ Print Name and Title: J /~ ~ I ~~ e c.~ /f't~nha,°~C r' ~~~~~ RESOLUTION NO 02-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16257, A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT, AND THE RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2001-00567, FOR 342 APARTMENTS ON 24 2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ONTHE WESTSIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, and 29 A Recitals 1 Forecast Corporation filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is refer-ed to as "the application " 2 On January 9 and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the Cdyof Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on January 9, and January 23, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together Nnth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, with a street frontage of approximately 1,700 feet on Etiwanda Avenue, and an approximate lot depth of 1,500 feet, and is presently vacant, and b Eight existing single-family residences, not a part of the proposed protect, are located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site The I-15 Freeway borders the property on the north and west The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commercial development To the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, the property has been approved fora 272 multi-family residential development, and c The application contemplates a condominium subdivision of one lot for 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land vwthin the Medwm Residential Distnct, Etiwanda South Overlay Distnd, and Etnvanda Avenue Overlay Distnct of the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan, and ~~ ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-17 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 2 d. The proposed project, together ninth the conditions applicable thereto, moll not be detnmental to the public health, safety or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speGfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows• a The tentative tract is consistent ninth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent ninth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not I~key to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract vmll not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property mnthin the proposed subdivision 4. Based upon the facts and infomtation contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Decaration, togethermnth all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project moll have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance moth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEr]A guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration ninth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that moll result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which an: listed as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows. In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect moll have potential for an adverse impact upon vnldlife resouroes orthe habilat upon which mnldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Decaration, the staff reports and exhibds, and the reformation provided to the Planning '~f ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-17 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 3 Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every cond~Lon set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannino Diwsion 1) Prowde a greenway connection in accordance with Etiwanda Spetafic Plan Section 5 33 400 2) Construct a 6-foot decorative wrought iron fence along project boundary adjoining the follovwng parcels APN 227-211-22 and 23 3) Walls shall comply moth setback regwrements of the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan 4) Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 is hereby approved subtect to replacement planting as shown in the conceptual landscape plan • Engineennp Droision 1) Construct Etrvvanda Avenue to "Secondary Artenal" and Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan Standards, including cobble curb and gutter, sidewalk, dove approaches, street lights, street trees, a c pavement, traffic signs, and sloping a) Provide a sidewalk/walkway on the west side of Etrvvanda Avenue from the north project boundary to Miller Avenue b) Prowde separate nght -turn lanes at both protect entrances The nght turn lane south of Gartaa Dnve Gan be combined v~nth a school bus bay per City Standards 2) Provide a focused Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue Mitigate traffic impacts to an acceptable level of service 3) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommumGations and electntaal) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City poor to Final Map approval The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontage 4) Install Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan System 9 drainage fatalities in Foothill Boulevard from Etrvvanda Avenue to the existing terminus south of Tract 15711-1 Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the fatality and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan fatalities, in accordance with City policy This area is subtect to the ~j ~ E i ot~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-17 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 . Page 4 modified fee adopted March 21, 2001 If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate 5) Install local storm dram facilities as needed from the proled site to Foothill Boulevard. Install manhole at publiGpnvate lundion 6) Sumps in the pnvate stone drain system shall be designed for Q100 Pond depth shall not exceed 12 inches 7) Provide an ingress/egress access easement in favor of Assessor Parcel Nos 227-211-22 and 227-211-23 8) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Basin No 6 9) Tract 15711-1 has provided land for an area-wide detention basin The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related fatalities (outlet, etc) The fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 per acre, which shall be paid pnor to building permit issuance 10) Caltrans has not allowed stone dram fatalties within Foothill Boulevard The required storm dram shall be constructed within the parkway or a Gty easement north of the Caltrans right-of--way Off-site easements shall be obtained pnor to Final Map approval Environmental Mitication Geologic 1) Site grading shall include removal and recompadion of surface sods Relative compaction shall be as determined by the proled engineer in a final geotechnitaal report 2) Pnor to issuance of grading permits for the proled, a final grading plan shall be prepared in compliance with recommendationscontained in the final geotechnitaal report Water 1) The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how stortnwaterwill be conveyed ataross the site and directed into the City's storm drain system 2) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs . to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer ~~ ~ Iol PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-17 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 5 Air Quality 1) Painting activities shall be spaced out over a period of 80 days 2) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabdizrng agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, rn accordance v~nth SCAQMD Rule 403 3) Etnvanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when v~nnd speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMra emissions from the site during such episodes 5) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactrve for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 6) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based onlow-emission factors and high-energy effiGency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans inctude a statement that all construction equipment well be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 8) The construction contractor shall ensure thatconstruction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use Transportation 1) Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting parking and controlling roadway access 2) Construct all streets internal to the protect to full ultimate cross-sections as adtacent development occurs 3) Construct all streets bordering the project to ultimate half-section vntlths in conjunction vwth development 4) Landscape planting and signs shall be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure good visibility 5) Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adjacent arterials ~f ~ loa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-17 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 6 Noise 1) Seven-foot high 5/&inch thick, solid Lexan (or egwvalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent matenal) patio and balcony sound bamer panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway nght-of--way that have a full or partial wew of the I-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centerline of Etiwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of Etiwanda Avenue Final size and composition of matenal to be used in the noise bamers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City 2) An appropnate ventilation or cooling system shall be inGuded in the design to provide ventilation of the units wnthout requinng that ~nnndows be opened The type of ventilation system well be chosen in consultation wrath City staff pnorto issuance of building permits 3) First floor apartment wnndows in bwlding walls that would have a full or partial wew of either the I-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will require the placement of acoustically rated wnndows. The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted pnorto issuance of budding pernits for the affected buildings 4) Bwldings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either the I-15 Freeway or Etrvvanda Avenue well requre the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors The final design and rating of the doors and related matenals shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted pnorto issuance of budding pernrts for the affected bwldings The Secretary to this Commission shall tartly to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Laity T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wnt ~EElo3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-17 SUBTT16257 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 7 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT COMMISSIONERS (~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ~ PROGRAM Project Flle No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance vhll be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps vwll be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and ds corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monrtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action vnll be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation well be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the folloHnng address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion) 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • b~ ~ 195 Mitigation Monitoring Program TT SUBTT16257 & CUP DRC2001-00557 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the pro/ect planner or responsible City department, to monitorspecific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the project planner 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring vnll be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible Citydepartment at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arse regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwritten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible Citydepartment also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance vnth a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Devision shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor Citystaff time to monitorand report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporteras an individual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. i ~£ ~ ~o ~ J Project File No.: DRC 2001-00557/SUBTT16257 Initial Study Prepared by: Natalie P. Pattv Applicant: Forecast Corporation Date: December 18 2001 Cieologio Probiems~ ~°'~"'~~ "'`'~ ~ ~ r s et,,Fx',-v~,~ L S ~~, Site grading shall Indude removal and recompactlon of surface soils Relative wmpactlon shall be as determined by the projed engineer in a final geotechnical report Pnor to issuanceof gradingpernifsforMeproJed,afinalgradingplan shall be prepared in compliance wrth recommendatlons contained in the final geotechnicel report +~ , .u~"~n.;~r~E~t. The applicant shall submit a final d i CE CP/CE B B Revew of Plans ReWewofPlans - C D - i 2 2 ra nage plan showing how stommvater will be conveyed aaoss Me site and direced Into the Glys CPlCE B Review of Plans D 2 store drain system Pnor to issuanceof grading permits, the applicent shall identify BMPS CE B to be Implemented during the penod the site Is under construdlon Review of Plans C 2 BMPS shall be Identlfled on the grading plans for review and approval by Ne City Engineer AIr'Quality~;"~u',''~~,x,~,.,~ y~.,v~~~~.-, ~ ~... Palntlng actlvitles shall be s a d t p ce ou over a period of80 days CP C R i f Pl ev ew o ans q 2 The site shall be treated with water or other soil slabllibng agent CP C (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) dally to reduce PM10 Review of Plans q 2 emissions, in accordance Wih SCAQMD Rule 403 Ehwanda Avenue shall be swept according toaschedule established CP C by the Crty to reduce PM10 emissions assodated with vehide hacking Review of Plans q 2 of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon tlme of year d consWCtlon Grading operetlons shall ba suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C 25 mph to minimise PM10 emissions from the site during such Revew of Plans A 2 episodes Chemipl Boll stabill~re (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C be applied to all inactive consW dlon areas that remain inactve for 90 Review of Plans q 2 hours or rtrore to reduce PM10 emissions The consWctlon contractor shall select the consWdion equipment CP used on-site based on low emissim favors and high~nergy effidency C Review of Plans q 2 The consWCtlon contrador shall ensure the consfructlon grading plans Indude a statemenllhat all consW coon equipmentwiil be timed and maintained in akxnrdance vnth the manufacWreYS spedfiptlons MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) - - The censWction centractorshall utilize eledncor dean altematlve fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans mdude a statemenlthat work crews will shut oRequipment when not in use .. CP CP C B/C .. Review of Plans Review of Plans ... A AIC •r 2 2 Traffic =~ "~~ {x-} '~= _~~~ „~-ta `h;~`~'n~';~ + >~° `x ~, re ~;, ~,-,~,x, t'%;,;~ ~~ . Maintain a high level of service along artedats by resWCtlng parking , PO C Revew of Plans A - ; ,~ - , lr and centroiling roadway access 2 ConsWct all streets Internal to the project to full ultimate cross- CE C Review of Plans q sections as adjacent development occurs 2 Construct all streets bordenng the project to ultimate half-section CE C Revew of Plans A wndths in conjunction WUt development 2 Landscape planting and signs should be limited to 36 inches In height CP D Review of Plans A within 25 feet of project dnvevays to assure good vislbdity 3 Install a STOP sign on site egress roadvey to adjacent arterials CP D Review of Pl A ans 3 Noise ~ ._,i+f' e>'yL4.. r"N~ °° t3~L $y X~ iyiR A U°~4; ~'y`~~ w "~C° uvip"~~ 4' ~ u ~ $~r ~ ^~ ~L• . n Seven-foot high, 5/&mch thick, solid Lexan (or an equlvalentabreslon CP • D ., ~_ _ s Review of Plans ., _ A n ` , " resistant, non-yellowing transparent matenal) patlo and batconysound 3 barrier panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies 'lvrthln 350 feet of the freeway nght-of-way that have a full or partial wew of the I-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centedine of EUwanda Avenue and that have a full or partial view of Edwanda Avenue Final size and composition of matenal to be usedmthe noise barters shall be determined in a final aceusUCal analysis of the final site plans submitted to Ne City An appropnate ventilation or cooling system shall be Inducted In the BO D Revew of Plans A 3 design to prowde ventilation for the units vnthout regmdng that windows be opened The type of ventilation system will be chosen In consultation vnN City stag prior to issuance of buddmg permits F~rslRoor apartmentwlndows in building walls thatwould haveafull or BO D Review of Plans A 3 partial wew of either the I-15 freeway or EUwanda Avenue will require the placemenlof acousUplly rated windows Theexad rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be cenducted prior to issuance of budding permits br the aRected bwldings Buildings nearest the roadways that haveafull or partial view of either BO D Review of Plans A 3 the I-15 freeway or Etiwanda Avenue well require the placement of acoustically rated extenor doors The final design and rating of the doors and related matenals shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be cenducted poor to Issuance ofbuilding pernds for the affected bwldings OO Ke to Checklist Abbreviations ReSponSibl@P@rson _ - - ` c -MonitodngFrequeney , ~a ~.~'+'~~ M~odo{Yerlflcstton~T~ 3~~'~ ;'Sanction§^~` ' `° CDD -Community Development Director or designee A rWith Each New Development ,~r u~s..,r,~~aar~, A - On-site Ins dion Pe ~~~ ~-..r~ ~%~ 'rk*bva~a, ~•~ CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construc4on B - Other Agenq Permit /Approval 1 -Withhold Recordation of Flnal Map 2 W CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWdlon C -Plan Chedc - ithhold Grading or Building Permit BO -Building Offidal or designee D - On Completlon D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 3 -Withhold CertlBcate of Occupancy 4 St W k O d PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operatlng - op or r er FC - Flre Chief or designee 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP . ~ ,. m 0 ~ ~ ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTTI SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments APPLICANT: Forecast Corporation LOCATION: West Side of Etiwanda, North of Foothill Boulevard ALL OF THE FOLLOW/NG CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Comole6on Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, its _/_/ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Cdy, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No 16257 is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use / / Permit DRC2001-00557 --- 3 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard _/_/_ Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Plannrng _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations and the Etiwanda Speafic Plan SC-11-01 1 ~ f ~'~ Prgect No SUBTT16257 Comolehon Date 2 All site, grading, landscape, ircigabon, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/~ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, budding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, _/_/_ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwldmg permit issuance 4 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance wdh the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Poltcy pnor to approval of the final map 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Resfrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/ /_ Homeowners' Assocation are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property /_! owner, homeowners' assocation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of building permits 8 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice regwrements, special street posting, phone listing for community cencems, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing D. Landscaping For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertd¢ing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included I / /. in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency wdh any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Division Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, speamen size trees, meandering _/_/. sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Etiwanda Avenue E. Environmental 1 Mdigation measures are regwred for the pro/ect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Ctty Planner in the amount of $719 prior to the issuance of budding permits, g ~aranteeing satisfactory performance SC-11-01 y ~~ ~ ~ ~ I Protect No SUBTT16257 Comole4on Date and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain • consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the fallowing / /_ a Stte/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddioning, and . g Planning Division Pro/ect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred pnor to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls / / 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/ the City pnor to permit issuance G. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the pro/ect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Bulding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Unrfonn Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Dmsion for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to _/_/ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Budding Offiaal, after tract/parcel map recordation and / / pnor to issuance of building permits --- 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/ / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays A SC-11-01 g ~ f ~ l'am` -~ Protect No SUBTT16257 Comolehon Date 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public /_/ counter) - 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department /_/- for approval - H. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Budding Code for the property Irne clearances considering _/_/- use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2. Provide compliance with the California Budding Code for required occupancy separation(s) -/_/- 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/ /_ 4 Prowde draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table / / 5-A - - - 5 Prowde draft stops in attics in line with common walls / / 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A /_/_ 7 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the / / construction type shall be V-1 Hour --- 8 Walis and Floors separating dwelling units in the same bwlding shall be not less than 1-hour / / fire-resistive construction --- I. Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with the California Budding Code, City _/-/ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualfed engineer licensed by the State of California to / / perform such work --- 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / bme of application for grading plan check --- 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of budding permits -/_/- 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for -/_/ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Crvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedicetion shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / / street centerline) ---. 50 total feet on Eitwanda Avenue / / sc-~~-o~ 4 '~~ ~I13 Protect No SUBTT'16257 Comole6on Date 2 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the Ctty for the following streets, except for -/-/- approved openings Etrvvanda Avenue 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint -/ /- maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Prwate drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / / noted on the final map --- 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the / / final map --- 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 _/_/_ feet measured from the face of curbs If curb ad/scent sidewalk is used along the right tum lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided 7 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the regwred off-site property Interests -/-/- necessary to construct the regwred public Improvements, and If he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior tc submittal of the final map for approval, enter Into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the Clty acquires the property interests required for the Improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required In connection with the subdivision Secunty for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given In an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped -/-/ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall Include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, dnve approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following penmeter street improvements InGuding, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trait Median Island Bike Trell Other Etlwanda Avenue X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigaticn on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and ovedays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Traffic Signals, (f) Cobble Curb 3 Improvement Plans and Construction / / a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights -/-/- on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first SC-11-01 5 D ~ Protect No SUBTT16257 Comolehon Date b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _/_/ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and I _/ / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconsWdion _/_/_ pro/ect along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect winng Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Conduct shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specfied. e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City I _/ /_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the wst of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon t:ompletion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be _/ /~ installed to City Standards, except for single tamely residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/ / 4 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work vnthin the following nghtof-way 1-15 I _/_/. Freeway L. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver tone to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting I _/ / Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 All required public landscaping and imgation systems shall be continuously maintained by the I _/_/ developer until accepted by the City M. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map I _/ /_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalities shall be installed as requred by the Ctty Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the I _/_/_ property from adjacent areas N. Utilities • 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required SC-11-01 g ~ ~ Project No SUBTi16267 Comole4on Date 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardmo A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdivision or pnor to the issuance of permits m the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them O. General Requirements and Approvals Etrvvanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid pnor to final map approval or pnor to butlding permit issuance rf no map is involved 2 Permds shall be obtained from the following agencies for work vinthm their right-of-way Cal Trans 3 Anon-refundable deposd shall be paid to the City, covenng the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, pnor to final map approval or pnor to bwiding penmt issuance rf no map is involved ~LICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION NNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-11-01 ~~~~~~ _~_~ -~ ~_ -~-~- -~ ~_ -~-~- /_/_ '. N.. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT `~~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION ~ STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW: FD-01-0532 PROJECT #: SUBTT16257/DRC2001-00557 PROJECT NAME: Forecast Group DATE: December 18, 2001 PLAN TYPE: CUP for 386 Umt Apartments APPLICANT NAME: Michele Schiro OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 w/ Group A Division 3 Uses FLOOR AREA (S): 16 or more dwelling units LOCATION: N/O of Foothtll W/O Etiwanda FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protectiwn Planrnng Speaahst PLANNER: Kart Courv ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the pro/ect as submitted These condtions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire District regwrements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fve District regwrements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review Prior to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed All Fve DisMct condtions and comments must be addressed for wnstruction permits can be issued Contact the Fve Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verity compliance A. Community Facilities Districts 1 This protect is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Factlities District B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water Distract 2 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fir District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Fire flow regwrements for this protect shall be 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended D~ ~ ~~ 7 4 When any portion of a faality or building ~s located in excess of 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on r public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 5 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible budding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safet) Division 6 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fve Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The budder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fve Safety Dmsion 8 Existing fire hydrants and mains v~nthin 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 9 Prior to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 10 Requved Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following pnor to the issuance of the budding permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 11 Prior to the issuance of any Certficete of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a bulding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract Water Avarlabrlrtv /or Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire eMingwshing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow D. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the building(s) 2 All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupanaes with an occupant load of 50 or mare persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access regwrements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 3 Required Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commercial structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupanaes with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire Distract D~~1~8 4 Pnor to the issuance of a bwldmg permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire spnnkler system Fve Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 5 Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler system(s) shall be tested accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire spnnkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire spnnkler system Momtonng is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies E. Fire Access 1 Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every taality, budding, or portion of a bwldmg constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the budding is located more than 150-feet from approved fire district vehide access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or budding 2 Fire District access roadways shall mdude public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes 3 Residential Pnor to recordation of a subdiwsionltrecUparcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fve District access roadways and fire lanes All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 4 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading pennds, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or prnate, from the Fire District in consultation tenth the Grading Commdtee The plans shall mdude the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the vndth of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be dearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise requved Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modficetions in fire lanes or access roadways wthout prior written approval of the Fve District, Fire Safety Division 5 The minimum unobstructed vndth for a Fve District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the mirnmum vndth of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 6 All portions of the faGldy or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located wthin 150 feet of Fve District vehiGe access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the budding Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior bwldmg openings 7 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submilted prior to final bwldmg plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Dvision for specific details and ordering information 8 Pnor to the issuance of any grading permds, the applicant shall submil and obtain the Fire D~stnct's approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fve District access roadways/dnveways 9 Gated or restricted access regwres the installation of a Knox rapid entry system Vehide access gates shall be provided with an approved Fve District Knox Key Swdch The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fve District key st~ntch Gates shall open by means of an approved Traffic Pre-emption Device. Contact the Fve Safety Division for specfic details and ordering information 10 The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire spnnkler systems This cenddion applies when the Fve District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or delaNng response exists 11 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a mirnmum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehiGes 12 A bwldmg or site dvectory shall be regwred, as noted below Lighted dvectory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the sde 13 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fve District Standards ~~~Il°I 14 Dead~nd Fire Disthct access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided vnth approved provisions for the fuming around of fire apparatus This may inGude a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District 15 Pnor to the issuance of a budding penmt, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fve • Disthct for fire lanes on required Fire Disthct access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indipte the locetions of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minmum Fire Disthct standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Disthd at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 16 Pnor to the issuance of any Certfcate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CCBR's shall also idenMy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes 17 New bwidings shall post the address vnth minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwldmg setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minmum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 18 In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwldmg ident~cation letters shall be provided on the front and back of all unts, swtes, or bwldings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination wilh the City of Rancho Cucamonga F. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg permd for combustible construction, the bwlder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire Distnd Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times G. Architectural Bwlding Plans 1 Prior to approval of a sile developmenUuse penmt, or the issuance of a bwldmg permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shalt submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Call the Fire Construction Sernces Urnt at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architecturel Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal H. Fire Alarm System 1. An automatic fire alann (and detection) system is requred by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adapted code or standard 2 Prior to issuance of a bwldmg penmt, plans for the fire alann system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed Hnthout a Fire District permit 3 Prior to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire District approval and a permit are requred Plans and specficetions shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services I. Fire District Fees Due 1 Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire • District as follows $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial or multi-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Permd Fee (CUP) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection p~ ~ 12.0 $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new bwlding) for Multi-family Residential Development 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews wall be assessed upon se submittals of plans J. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Speaal Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be requred for any actmty or operation not spec~cally described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to Irfe or property b Operate a place of public assembly c. To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the required fire district access roadway This includes any gate, bamer, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fve District response d Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet e Operate dust-producing processes and operations f Flammable and combustible ligwd (storage, handling, and/or use) g Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or trensport, exceeding 120 gallons) h Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy). K. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with DssGosure and Reporting Regulations 1 The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions requre that the San Bernardino County Fire' Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Dmsion at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantifies at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 3 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated 4 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount 5 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found m 49 CFR) regardless of amount 6 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantfies exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T P O) EMremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 7 Any business subtect to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Tdle III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, inGuding retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements To get more information on EPCRA regwrements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies Submission of your Busines~ Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this regwrement, however, EPCRA does require full annua inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory ~~ ~ 121 8 Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR 9 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Budding and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be requved rf regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new faality Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance 10 Any busmess that operates on rented or leased property, and is regwred to submit a Plan, is regwred to submd a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner 11 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be regwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs L. Plan Submittal Requved Notice 1 Plans shall be submtted and approved prior to construction in accordance wdh 1997/98 Budding, Fire, Mecharncal, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews Nall be assessed at time of submittal of plans. Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision b4~j22 RESOLUTION NO 02-18 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00557, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 342 APARTMENTS ON 24.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND ETIWANDA AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDAAVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 17, 20, AND 29 A Rentals 1 Forecast Corporation filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect conditional use pertnit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public heanng on January 9, and January 23, 2002, inGuding written and oral staff reports, together ~nnth public testimony, this Commission hereby spenficaly finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, vv~th a street frontage of approximately 1,700 feet on Etrvvanda Avenue, and an approwmate lot depth of 1,500 feet, and is presently vacant, and b Eight existing single-family residenn:s, not a part of the proposed protect, are located on an inverted L-shaped property at the central portion of the site The I-15 Freeway borders the property on the north and west The property to the south is vacant, but is planned for commernal development To the east, an•oss Etiwanda Avenue, the property has been approved fora 272 multi-family residential development, and c The application contemplates the development of 368 apartments on 26 7 acres of land v~nthin the Medwm Residential District, Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District of the Etiwanda Spenfic Plan, and . d The proposed protect, together Hnth the conditions applicable thereto, Hnll not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vinnity DE E ~ 2.3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The conditional use permit is consistent v~nth the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The development of the proposed protect well not cause a significant traffic impact on the surrounding area, and e The design of the protect is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and f. The design of the protect vwll not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property • 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, togetherNnth all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monrtonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Decaration has been prepared in compliance wrath the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the mfomtation contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Decaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that wall result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project vwll have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of • adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations p~ ~- I2`I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION . January 23, 2002 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condlion set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~o Diwsion 1) Provide a greenway connection m accordance with Etiwanda Specrfic Plan Section 5 33 400 2) Construct a 6-foot decorative wrought iron fence along protect boundary adtornmg the following parcels APN 227-211-22 and 23 3) Walls shall comply ninth setback regwrements of the Etrvvanda Specific Plan 4) Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 rs hereby approved subtect to replacement planting as shown m the conceptual landscape plan 5) The roll-up garage door designs shall be subtect to Crty Planner review and approval 6) Architectural enhancements through the use of native over rock shall be provided to the buldmgs fronting Etrvvanda Avenue, subtecl to City Planner review approval 7) Additional landscaping and trees shall be provided at the intenorprotecl penmeter adtacent to the existing single-family residences at the central portion of the site, to reduce the visual impact of the proposed bwldrngs on the surrounding neighbors, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 8) The decorative penmeter fence along Etrwanda Avenue shall incorporate large native stone pilasters m its design The stone plasters shall be developed at a minimum of 30 inches squared and subtect to City Planner approval. 9) All applicable Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 shall apply Engineennq Division 1) Construct Etiwanda Avenue to "Secondary Artenal" and Etiwanda Speafic Plan Standards, including cobble curb and gutter, sidewalk, dove approaches, street lights, street trees, a c pavement, traffic signs, and stnpmg a) Prowde a sidewalk/walkway on the west side of Etrvvanda Avenue from the north protect boundary to Mller Avenue b) Provde separate nght tum lanes at both protect entrances The nght tum lane south of Garcra Dnve can be combined moth a school bus bay per City Standards p s ~ 1.25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 4 2) Provide a focused Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue Mitigate traffic impacts to an acceptable level of service 3) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overfiead utilities (telecommunications and electntaal) on the opposite side of Etrvvanda Avenue shall be paid to the City pnor to Final Map approval. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage 4) Install Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan System 9 drainage fatalities in Foothill Boulevard from Etrvvanda Avenue to the existing terminus south of Tract 15711-1 Standard drainage fees for the sde shall be credited to the cost of the fatality and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy This area is subject to the modified fee adopted March 21, 2001 If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement vnthin 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. C_~ 5) Install local storm dram fatalities as needed from the protect site to Foothill Boulevard Install manhole at public/pnvate function. 6) Sumps in the pnvate stone dram system shall be designed for Q100 Pond depth shall not exceed 12 inches 7) Provide an ingress/egress access easement in favor of Assessor Parcel Nos 227-211-22 and 227-211-23 8) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Basin No. 6 9) Tract 15711-1 has provided land for an area-wide detention basin The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related fatalities (outlet, etc) The fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 per acre, which shall be paid pnor to budding permit issuance 10) Caltrans has not allowed storm dram facilities within Foothill Boulevard The required storm dram shall be constructed within the parkway or a City easement north of the Caltrans nght-of--way Off-site easements shall be obtained pnor to Final Map approval Environmental Mitigation Geologic 1) Site grading shall inGude removal and recompaction of surface sods Relative compaction shall be as determined by the project engineer in a final geotechnitaal report D4 ~-~ z~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 5 2) Pnor to issuance of grading penmts for the protect, a final grading plan shall be prepared m compliance vnth recommendations contained in the final geotechmcal report. Water 1) The applicant shall submit a final drainage plan shovnng how storm waterwnll be conveyed aa'oss the site and directed into the Cdys storm dram system 2) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented dunng the penod the site ~s under construction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for rewew and approval by the City Engineer Air Qualrty 1) Pamt~ng activities shall be spaced out over a penod of 80 days fL_~ 2) The site shall be treated wrath water or other sod stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance wrath SCAQMD Rule 403 3) Etrvvanda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assoaated wrath vehide tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to mmim~ze PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 5) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain mactrve far 98 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 6) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on tow-emission factors and high-energy effiaency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans indude a statement that all construction equpment will be tuned and maintained m accordance with the manufacturers speaficetions 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altematrve fuel-powered egwpment where feasible U 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that constructon-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use ~p ~ ~ ( 2"1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 6 Transportation 1) Maintain a high level of service along arterials by restricting padang and controlling roadway access 2) Construct all streets internal to the pro/ect to full ulbmatecross-sections as ad/scent development occurs 3) Construct all streets bordering the protect to uRimate half-secLon vwdths in contuncbon Hnth development 4) Landscape planting and signs shall be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of protect driveways to assure good visibility 5) Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adtacent arterials Norse 1) Seven-foot high 5/8•inch thick, solid Lexan (or egwvalent abrasion resistant, non-yellowing transparent material) patio and balcony sound bamer panels should be installed at front yard patios and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway right-of--way that have a full or partial wew of the I-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centerline of Etrvvanda Avenue and that have a full or partial wew of Etrvvanda Avenue Final size and composition of material to be used in the noise bamers shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis of the final site plans submitted to the City 2) An appropriate ventilation or cooling system shall be included in the design to provide ventilation of the units Hnthout requinng that ~nnndows be opened The type of ventilation system Hell be chosen in consultation Huth City staff prior to issuance of building permits 3) First floor apartment Hnndows m bwldmgs walls that would have a full or partial view of either the I-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue will regwre the placement of acoustically rated Hnndows The exact rating shall be determined in a final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted pnorto issuance of building permits for the affected buildings 4) Bwldings nearest the roadways that have a full or partial view of either the I-15 Freeway or Etiwanda Avenue, will regwre the placement of acoustically rated exterior doors The final design and rating of the doors and related materials shall be determined in the final acoustical analysis that shall be conducted prior to issuance of building pernits for the affected bwldmgs 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • ~~~128 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 7 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST- Laity T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plannng Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the folloHnng vote-to-Nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. D~~~Z~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ~ PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who well take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance vwll be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelines As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the Cdy Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and properaction is taken on each mitigation. Each Citydepartment shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps well be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation well be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports vwll be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 U~ ~ 130 Mitigation Monitoring Program TT SUBTT16257 8 CUP DRC2001-00557 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined bythe project planner or responsible Citydepartment, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reportmg Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requred for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reportmg Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring v~nll be signed off as completed by the protect planneror responsible Citydepartment at the bottom of the MMP Reportmg Form. 6 Unantiapated arcumstances may arise requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe project planneror responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The pro/ect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written notification has been issued The protect planneror responsible Citydepartment also has the M authonty to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance vnth a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The project planner or responsible City department has the authontyto hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucemonga Planning Division. The Devision shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) v~nth the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtorand report on the mitigation measure br the required period of time 9 In those instances requmng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporteras an individual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits ~-1 ~~E ~ i,3~ Project File No.: DRC 2001-00557/SUBTT16257 Initial Study Prepared by: _Natalie P Pattv Applicant: Forecast Corporation Date: December 18 2001 N u, - ~ •.... ~ . ..r~~, ~. Geologic Pioblerna s ~ _ ~> ~ ~,~ -_ ~r~ u~ to greding shall indude removal and recempacUon of surface so(Is Relatlve cempachon shall be as determined by the proJectengineer in a final geotechnipl report Prior to Issuance ofgreding pennifs for the project,aflnalgreding plan shall be prepared In compliance with recommendatlons contained In the Anal geotechnicel report Water ~r4c ~ p s CE CP/CE ~a t~ a~~ S 1 B B ~~ ~ Review of Plans Review of Plans C D 2 2 a , c ~~} tN i Th k iyi~ , 1 A £ y ~ e applicant shall submit a final drainage plan showing how stomtwater will be conveyed across the site and direded Inb th Gt CP/CE B Review of Plans D 2 e ys storm dreln system Pdor to Issuance of grading permits, the apphcentshall Identity BMPs CE B ,to be implemented dunng fhe period the site Is under construdtion Review of Plans C 2 BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by th e City Engineer / ~ Air Quality k, ''fi c`r' M2 '~ni ,~~ r t ,? ~ ~ ~ , ,. p I've +, , tf Y a ~ ~ 5 , n~; a t ~ n"'.~4 ` d ~r i `. , a=.+ ~. , {' Paintlng actlwUes shall be spaced out over a period of80 days CP C t ~" ~ Review of Plans A 2 The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilibng agent CP C Review of Plans A (approved by SCAQMD and RWDCB) daily to reduce PM10 2 emissions, In accordance Wth SCACMD Rule 403 Etnranda Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established CP C by the City to reduce PM10 emissions assodated with vehicle hacking Review of Plans A 2 of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon tlme of year of cens W ctlon Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of Plans A 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such 2 episodes Chemipl soil stabilizers (approved by SCAC]MD and RWQCB) shall CP C Review of Plans A be applied to all inactive cons Wctlon areas that remain Inactlve for 96 2 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions The censWchon contractor shall seled the consWdion equipment CP used on-site based on low emisslm fadoreand highenergyefticenq C Review of Plana A 2 The censWdion contrador shall ensure the construction grading plans Indude a statement that all construction equipmentwlll be tuned and maintained in accordancewith the manufadurefsspedflcetlons MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) r 1 / - , . ~ ,. .. ... -• The censWctloncentractorshall utilize eledncar dean alfematlvefuel CP C powered equipment where feasible Review of Plans A 2 The consWCbon contractor shall ensure that consWction~reding plans indude a statement that work news viii shut oftequipmentwhen CP B/C Review of Plans A/C 2 not in use ixH ~ ° p~ a .,u, --, Traffic ~ "~~k"F~~ `;~-~',~a.~c` ,` ~,. ~'~ ~~'",, Maintain a high level of service along artedals by restrictlng parking PO C and controlling roadway access Revlew of Plans A 2 ConsWct all streets internal to the project to full ultlmate cross- CE C Revlew of Plans A sectlons as adjacent development occurs 2 ConsWct all streets bordedng the project to ultlmate half-sectlon CE C Review of Plans A widths in conJuncbon wth development 2 Wndscepe plantlng and signs should be limited to 361nches in height CP D Review of Plans A within 25 feet of project dnveways to assure good wsib(Iity 3 Install a STOP sign on site egress roadway to adjacent artedals ~ CP 0 Review of Plans A g ... ,_r ~ .-~.,~- I Seven-foot high, 5/8-Inch thick, solid Lexan (or an equivalentabrasfon CP D - Review of Plans A resistant, non-yellowing transparent matenal) patlo and balcony sound 3 barter panels should be installed at front yaM patlos and balconies within 350 feet of the freeway rightof-way that have a full or paNal ~ view of the I-15 freeway and within 140 feet of the centedme of Etlwanda Avenue and that have a full or partlal view of Etiwanda Avenue Final size and composition of matenal to be used in the noise barters shall be determined in a final acoustical analysts of the final site plans submitted to the City An appropdate venGlabon or cooling system shali be inducted In the BO D Review of Plans A design to provide venblatlon for the unds without requiring that 3 windows be opened The type of ventllallon system wall be chosen in censultatlon vAlh City staff prior to Issuance of building pertnifs Flrstfloor apartmentwindows In building walls that would haveafull or BO D Review of Plans A partial view of either the I-15 freeway or Etlvranda Avenue wlil require 3 the placement ofaceustlcellyrated windows Theexad ratlng shall be determined in a final acoustlpl analysis that shall be conducted pdor to Issuance of bwlding permits br the affected buildings Buildings nearest tha roadways that haveafull or partlal view of either BO D Revlew of Plans A the I-15 freeway or Etlwanda Avenue will require the placement of 3 aceustlcelly rated extenor doors The final design and retlng of the doors and related matenals shall be determined In the final acoustcal analysis that shall be conducted pdor to Issuance ofbuilding permib for the afleced buldings V M m W to -C -C -B .p -F V -m- m w L or de: r or dd: dal or do or: y "`I"; AAa or designee A- pos s 6 -Revoke CUP 1 -Withhold Recordatlon of Flnal Map 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit 3 - WlMhold Certificate of Ocwpanq / Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order 5 -Retain De It or Bond COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 SUBJECT: Etiwanda Apartments APPLICANT: Forecast Corporation LOCATION: West Side of Etiwanda Avenue, North of Foothill Boulevard ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at ds own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, bwldmg and construction plans, and landscape and irigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire rf bwldmg permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, archdectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign • program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etrvvanda Specific Plan ~~ ~1, 3S Comole6on Date _~-~. -~ ~_ -~-~- /_/_ Protect No DRC2001-00557 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~ 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Budding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permits _ _ _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ _ building, etc) or pnor to final map approval to the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ time of bwldtg permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / / by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) pnor to the issuance of budding permits _ _ _ Such plan shall indicate style, dluminahon, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptaGe(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and / / the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner revew and approval prior to the _ issuance of bwlding permits 9 All ground-mounted uhldy appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be • / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of wncrete _ _ _ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the / / adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map _ _ _ 11. All bwlding numbers and tndtwdual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, / / including proper illumtnatton _ _ _ 12 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and ArttGes of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Association are subteG to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions _ and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or pnor to the issuance of bwlding permts, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Assoaatton shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 13 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits 14 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / / lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ _ requirements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construcbon activity, dust control measures, and security Penang SC-11-01 ~£ ~ ~~v Protect No DRC2001.00557 15 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adfoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protest's penmeter 16 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant 17 For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code 18 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space shall be provided 19 For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the Development Code 20 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products D. Building Design All roof appurtenances, inGuding air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as requred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be inGuded in building plans ~. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (inGuding curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/unitslbuildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double stnped per City standards and all dmeway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be stnped per City standards 5 All units shall be provided with garage door openers d driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk 6 The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the prinapal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas 7 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way sc-11-01 ~~ ~ 13~ 3 Comofehon Date -/-/- / / / /_ -/-/- -/-/- / / /_/ -/-/. / / -~ /_ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- Protect No DRC2001-00557 Comole6on Date 8 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily / / residential protects or more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred _ _ ~ automobile parking spaces or three btcycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, addtttonal storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / / the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and _ _ _ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within / / the pro/ect 0°~ - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24- inch box or larger, _ _ _ 80°~ - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / / stalls, sufficient to shade 50°k of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 _ _ _ 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one / / tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding _ _ 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/ slope, shall be, at minimum, imgated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion ~ control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All pnvate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater / / slope shall be landscaped and imgated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as _ _ follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger s¢e shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropnate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting requred by this section shall inGude a permanent vrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/ / the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas _ _ within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and tramming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included / / in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and _ _ _ coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/ / sidewalks (wdh horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Etiwanda _ _ Avenue S~_„-0, b~~~3g ,4 Protect No DRC2001-00557 10 Landscaping and vngation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Dmsion 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the pnnaples o1 Xenscepe as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 13 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposd The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and imgation shall be installed poor to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City wdl accept a cash deposit for future landsceping of the Caltrans nghtof-way 14 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is regwred at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and rrigation of these Vees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division pnor to installation of any signs 2 Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominwm, or town homes pnor to occupancy and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Dvision pnor to issuance of bwiding permits H. Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bwlding materials and construction techniques provided, and rf appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The budding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 2 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including mondonng and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 pnor to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of budding permts b~~13`~ SC-11-01 5 ComoleGOn Date /_/ /_/, /_/. /_/_ -/-/- -/_~ -/-/- -/_/. -~ /_ -/-/- Protect No DRC2001.00557 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following / / a Stte/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line dtagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground dtagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddiomng, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/ /_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are requtred for fencing and/or walls _/_/~ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/ the Cdy prior to permit issuance K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to _/_/_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall prowde a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and 1 / prior to issuance of building permits --- 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public / / counter) - - - SC-11-01 ~~~ (~° 6 Protect No DRC2001-00557 Comolehon Date 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department / / • for approval _ _ _ L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code for the property Itne clearances considering / / use, area, and fire-resistiveness _ _ _ 2 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code for required occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions / / 4 Provide draft stops to attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, to accordance with UBC Table / / 5-A --- 5 Provide draft stops to attics in line with common walls / / 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A / / 7 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/_/_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour 8 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same bulding shall be not less than 1-hour / / fire-resistive construction --- M. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with the Caltfomia Bwlding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in _/_/_ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualtfied engineer licensed by the State of Califomta to / / perform such work _ _ _ 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualtfied engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application for grading plan check _ _ _ 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits _/_/_ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for / / existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of _ _ _ combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / / street centerline) _ _ 50 total feet on Ettwanda Avenue _/_/_ 2 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for / / ~ approved openings Ettwanda Avenue _ _ _ SC-11-01 D~ E lyl Y Proled No DRC2001-00557 ComoleGOn Date 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring lotnt _/-/- maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / / noted on the final map --- 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the / / final map --- 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a mwmum of 7 I -/-/- feet measured from the face of curbs If curb ad/scent stdewalk Is used along the nght tum lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided 7 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the requred off-site property interests _/_/_ necessary to construct the required public Improvements, and If he/she should fall to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter Into an agreement to complete the Improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the CIty acquires the property interests required for the Improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs Incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests requred in connection with the subdivision Secunty for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given In an appraisal report obtained by the Clty, at developer's cest The appraiser shall have been approved by the Clty prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain O. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped _/-/~ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street Improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to I -/-/- Street Name Curb 8 AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other ( ) Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X e Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, stdewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Traffic Signals, (f) Cobble Curb 3 Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights -/ / on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _/-/- permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Qffice In addition to any other permits required pF ~ I tiz SC-11-01 gi Protect No DRC2001-00557 Completion Date c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and / / interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _ _ _ d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / / protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and _ _ _ interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Ctty Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Ctty Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specfiied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per Ctty _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing Ctty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane Gosure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots _ _ _ h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ 4 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way I-15 / / Freeway _ _ _ P. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to Loin and/or farm the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building _ _ _ permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / / developer until accepted by the City _ _ _ Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/ /_ approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/ property from adtacent areas _ R. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The develo er shall be res on ibl f r th l t f t t l t / / p p s e o e re oca ion o exis ing u i i ies as necessary _ _ ~p~~iy~ SC-11-01 ~ 9 Protect No DRC2001-00557 Comolehon Date 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the _ _ ~ Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved / / Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from _ _ _ them S. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage / / Fees shall be paid pnor to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is _ _ involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agences for work within their right-of-way Cal / / Trans _ _ _ 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / / new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to _ _ _ building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T S . ecurity Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All bwldings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures / / U. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _/_/_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/ / 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used _ _ 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ 4 All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/ /_ or alarmed V. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police _/_/_ with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at • (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 '~~~ ~~l sc-~~-o~ ,6 Protect No DRC2001-00557 W. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner 2 Secunty/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly m residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire X. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility 2 At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of protect shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division 3 All developments shall submit a 8 '/:" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department Y. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm rf needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 ~PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-11-01 Df E IBS 11~ Comoletion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. '- 4a FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ,~ ~ ~''~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW: FD-01-0532 PROJECT #: DRC2001-00557/SUBTT16257 PROJECT NAME: Forecast Group DATE: December 18, 2001 PLAN TYPE: CUP for 386 Unit Apartments APPLICANT NAME: Michele Schiro OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 w/ Group A Division 3 Uses FLOOR AREA (S): 16 or more dwelling units LOCATION: N/O of Foothill W/O Etiwanda FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Kirt Courv ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the pro/ect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not inGude all Fire Distract regwrements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fve Distract requvements Please make the necessary changes or corrections pnor to resubmitting for revew Pnor to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed All Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed for construction permds can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Diwsion to schedule an appointment to venfy compliance A. Community Facilities Distracts 1 This protect is sub/ect to the regwrements of the Mello-Roos Community Faalities Distract B. Water Plans for Fve Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fve hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water District 2 Pnor to the issuance of any budding peranit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications~ flow test data and calculations far the pnvate water main system for revew and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards ~~ E I`f~ 3 Fire flow requirements for this prolect shall be 2500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure o1 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire Flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 When any portion of a facility or building is located in excess of 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 5 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building matenals on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The budder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible budding matenals on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing matenals, etc) Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bulder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-sde fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The budder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fve Safety Division 8 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the prolect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 9 Pnor to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, spec~fcetions, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 10 Reqwred Note If the system is pnvate the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the budding pennd . a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repay, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District. b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fve District for acceptance 11 Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indiceting the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance vinth Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained m good conddion by the property owner C. Water Availabddy 1 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fne Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow D. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requves an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the building(s) 2 All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access regwrements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system i ~ ~ E I ~+~ 3 Required Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commertaal structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire Dist access regwrements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler syst meeting the approval of the Fire Distract 4 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire sprinkler system Fve Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 5 Prior to the issuance of a Certficete of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 6 The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies E. Fire Access 1 Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, bwldmg, or portion of a budding constructed when any portion of the fatality or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the bwldmg is located more than 150-feet from approved fire district vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building 2 Fve District access roadways shall include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes 3 Residential Pnor to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fve District for all Fve District access roadways and fire lanes All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 4 Residential & Commertaal Prior to issuance of any grading pennds, the applicant shall submd and obtai' approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fve Distnd in consultation wdh the Grading Committee The plans shall inGude the plan wew, sectional wew, and indicate the width of the street or court measured Now line to flow line All proposed fire apparetus lumarounds shall be Gearfy marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise requred. Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming dewces (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modficetions in fire lanes or access roadways wdhout prior written approval of the Fve District, Fve Safety Division. 5 The minimum unobstructed Nndth for a Fve District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 6 All portions of the fatality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located wdhin 150 feet of Fve D~stnct vehice access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the budding Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior building openings 7 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bwldmg plan approval Contact the Fve Safety Division for specfiic details and ordering information 8 Prior to the issuance of any grading pennits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fve Disfnd's approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fve District acta;ss roadways/driveways 9 Gated or restricted access regwres the installation of a Knox rapid entry system VehiGe access gates shall be provided v~nth an approved Fve District Knox Key Swdch The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fve District key sNntch Gates shall open by means of an approved Traffic Pre-empbon Dewce Conta the Fve Safety Division for specfic details and ordering infonnaUon 10 The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessdate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems This condition applies when the Fve District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or delaying response exists Df E I ~g 11 Trees and shrubs planted rn any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 12 A building or site directory shall be required, as noted below Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site 13 A note shall be placed on all plans which Dearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet rn width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintarned free and dear of any obstructions at all times dunng construction, in accordance with Frre Drstnct Standards 14 Dead-end Fire Drstnct access roadways rn excess of 150-feet shall be provided uvith approved provisions for the fuming around of fire apparatus This may include a cul~e-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire Drstnd 15 Pnor to the issuance of a burldrng permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire Drstnct for fire lanes on requrred Fire Distnd access roadway less than 40 feet rn vndth The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the mrnimum Fire Drstnct standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Frre Protection Distnd at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 16 Pnor to the issuance of any Cert~cate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CCBR's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohrbrt parking rn the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also rdentrfy who rs responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes 17 New buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncaliy illuminated dunng periods of darkness When the bwldmg setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 18 In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwldmg identfication letters shall be provided on the front and bade of all units, suites, or buildings The Frre Distnd shall review and approve the numbering plan m coordination v~nth the City of Rancho Cucamonga F. Combustible Consrudion Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg pennil for combustible construction, the builder shall submil a letter to the Frre District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times G. Arohitectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a bwldmg permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fve District Call the Frre Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Frre Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal H. Frre Alann System 1 An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is requred by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard 2 Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Frre District permit D~ E I~{~j 3 Prior to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire District approval and a permit are regwred Plans and specfigtions shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services 4 Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested accepted by Fire Construction Services I. Fve Distnd Fees Due 1 Fire Distract fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Distnd as follows ' $82 Sfart-up fee for commeraal, industrial or multi-family dwelling urnts (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Pennrt Fee (CUP) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new bwlding) for Multi-family Residential Development 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews wilt be assessed upon separate submittals of plans J. Hazard Control Penn~.s 1 As noted below Special Permits may be regwred, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permd shall be required for any activity or operation not spec~celly described belo which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to or property b Operate a place of public assembly c To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the regwred fire district access roadway This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fire Distract response. d Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet e Operate dust-produang processes and operations f Flammable and combustible liquid (storage, handling, and/or use) g Liquefied petroleum gas (storage, handling, use or transport, exceeding 120 gallons) h Hot work operations (welding and cutting operations in any occupancy) K. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations 1 The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions require that the San Bernardino County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bemardno County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at ar~ one time in the course of a year 3 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated ~p~ C 15~ 4 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pestiades, as defined by FIFRA, regardles: of amount 5 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount 6 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the thresholc planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 7 Any business subtect to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Tdle III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements To get more information on EPCRA regwrements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requvement, however, EPCRA does regwre full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA faalities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory 8 Any business that handles radioactive matenal that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR 9 If the factlity is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwldmg and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan Caldomia Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibds the City from isswng a final Certelicete of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specfic hazardous matenal disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facilely Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance • 10 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is regwred to submit a Plan, is regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business EmergencylContingency Plan mandates, and has complied welh the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner 11 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requving collection of information regarding hazardous materials at faalities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Prior to issuance of a Certfcete of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after el is approved by the San Bernardino County Fve Department In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be regwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs L. Plan Submittal Regwred Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance welh 1997/98 Bwldmg, Fire, Mechanicel, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans Fire Distract Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision ~~ ~i ~5 TO Brad Buller, Crty Planner DATE. January 16, 2002 Jack Lam, City Manager Jim Markman, City Attorney N6P City of Rancho Cucamonga G~~PMo ENO FR: Don Glover - 7954 Eliwanda Ave, Rancho Cucamgqra~aFtiPN Ice Rusting - !2837 Chervil Street, Rancho Cuc~thbnga 1~ 1,0~~ JP~ NN~NG PROJECT Eitwanda Apartments -Forecast Homes LP RE January 17, 2002 Meeting P~~~~\~~O -P Oear Srrs I received a letter in my marl box on January 15, 2002 :n regard to the above referenced meeting. Kitt Coury, Associate Planner wrrh the City, called me the evening of January 15, 2002 to remind me about the meeting. Me said the purpose of the meeting was for the develope- and the resrdents surrounded on three sides of this development (referred to as the 'donut hole" protect) to °wark out their differences" and that "a city representative would be there to answer technical questions first, rf this is a meeting for Prevrn to negotiate for the purchase of eight houses rn a "coNective" setting wrrh all the affected "donut hole" resrdents present, as he has previously attempted to do, then this is highly unacceptable to us As we pointed out to all of you in our letter of January 15, 2002 (copy enclosed), we beireve that it .sour right, as well as that of the other "donut hole" homeowners) ro have "confidentially"many negotiations with Mr Prevrn As a side note, we did send a letter to Mr Prevrn on January 15, 2002 requesting to negotiate wrrh him for the purchase of our properties wrrh •he cond~non of confidentiality, Mr. Prey turned down our offer fn his letter dated January 16, 2002 Our letter to Mr Prevrtr and his letter of response to us rs attached Second, if the purpose of this meeting is for the developer (forecast) and the "donut hole" homeowners to privately hammer out or negotiate conditions of approval among ourselves, then we +hink this is highly unusual. Our understanding is that it is for the Piannrng Commission, after receipt of written recommendations from the planning staff, to decide on the merits of approving th~s Protect and what condition of approvals should be placed on this Pro)ect /, "CItV't9ff r°4r4'Se^.~atl7s'~c~n'~'M ~;' •~ anali~Er ~';SrJ-ai C)t~fai'ali ~,i ae the dbveloper and •hr. "d~n~t hl~e~" rfa':~@rtE "TfSrfN2,CV°>il~,af,:~-~:e:" SbLryif like t "t:8C4 rrrm" dPa', 'H7: ~V'.Yi!~ aS~'1Te'~I~o'tih2 "ief~G~^tgCommissioners would strongly disapprove of such back room agreements that usurp their aunc~rrty it any Pven~, :ve ha~re a'rr!zd~• •~r;rt?n n !e^`^>~ `:, rt`3 Pl~nrmg fommissicn d~trd ienua~y 9, ).OSs7, !<:+I~rv^r th:9 con~i' :mss of aa~ ~;•rs! ~ha" we beUnvP should be ~m~osod nn this p•rnect before its approval. That letter was intended to be read at the Planning Commission's January 9, 2002 meeting, but this Protect was pulled from the agenda so we delivered the letter the next day tc the Planning Department As of rhs witting of this letter, we nave not reserved any response from the Ciry regarding our letter dated January 9, 2002 In conclusion, this January 17, 2001 meeting appears to have no agenda We can on~y assume that the purpose for it is either 1) to facilitate Forecast's ability to negotiate "collectively' with the "donut hole" homeowners without our respective tights to `ccnndent~ality" or 2) ro "work out a back room agreement between the developer and the "donut hole" homeowners in regard to conditions of approval. Again, this we believe is tantamount to back room negotiations that usurp the authority of the Planning Commission and the tight of the public to know In either case, we feel that it would be inappropriate for us to attend this ill advised private meeting being held at Gty Hall However, we would be quite fieppy to attend a publicly noticed meeting for design review and technical review meetings where we can voice our corcerns and present out case for our "proposed cnndir~nns of ac+oroval" (as outlined m the -~on Glovzr & toe Rusting letter o' January 9, 2002y to representatives of the Planning Commission, the developer would presumaGly have the same opportunity he-e ro present nis case, 5econdiy, we again urge the Cirv to nc~d a public mcwtintg or forum on the Qnvi~onrnentai survey R Proposes Neieative aecaratior for the ~roiect by the city consul*ant, as era*ed in Tracy Glovers letter of January ~, 2UU2 cn me proposes negative declaration, we behave that serous ~swes remain unanswered and must be addressed in separate p•rbhc hearings betare ilia praiert can be voted on by the Planrong Commission. friaily, :ve are ready to meet with staff or partinpate in a public Forum to ria~ify our letters regarding "conditions of approval" and the proposed tvegative'Jeciararisn. We will abo be willing to debate'~ne developer in this regard it the arv so desires, in a public rorum that is oubi~cly noticed, i~lease call Don Grover at 909-463-6081 if vov have any questions. ~. ,.?~ '~~ ~ti~~~~ -- -; .~ ~ Jul p~ e-_`~ _ ~'`'` ~ Ruslin PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnnp Diwsion 1) Provide a greenway connection m accordance wrath Etiwanda Speafic Plan Section 5 33 400 2) Construct a 6-feet-decorative wrought iron fence or wall along the interior protect boundary ^'' ^•^ ^^ •~° °^"^••• ^^ ^ ^°'° °D"' "' "' '~a:,Q =~, subject to City Planner review and approval. 3) Walls shall comply with setback requirements of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 4) Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567 is hereby approved subject to replacement planting as shown in the conceptual landscape plan 5) The roll-up garage door designs shall be subject to City Planner review and approval 6) Architectural enhancements through the use of native raver rock shall be provided to the buldmgs fronting Etiwanda Avenue, subject to City Planner review approval 7) Additional landscaping and trees shall be provided at the intenorprolect penmeter adjacent to the existing single-family residenaas at the central portion of the site, to reduce the visual impact of the proposed bwldings on the surrounding neighbors, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 8) The decorative penmeter fence along Etiwanda Avenue shall incorporate large native stone plasters in its design The stone plasters shall be developed at a minimum of 30 inches squared and subject to City Planner approval 9) All applicable Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16257 shall apply 10) Lighting shall be required to provide a minimum 1-foot candle power. Free-standing light standards shall not exceed 15 feet in height. Secunty lighting fixtures shall not project above the fascia or roofline of the bulling. All lighting shall be shielded to confine light spread within the site boundanes. 11) The final sidewalk locations and trash enclosure location immediately adjacent to the existing single-family homes along Chervil Street shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. (~ ~' /z. S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-18 CUP DRC2001-00557 -FORECAST CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 4 12) The applicant shall provide underground utility connections to the lots surrounded by the proposed protect subtect to City Planner review and approval Engineennc Division 1) Construct Etiwanda Avenue to "Secondary Arterial" and Etiwanda Specific Plan Standards, including cobble curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights, street trees, a c pavement, traffic signs, and striping a) Provide a sidewalk/walkway on the west side of Etrovanda Avenue from the north pro/ect boundary to Miller Avenue b) Provide separate right tum lanes at both pro/ect entrances The right turn lane south of Garcia Drive can be combined with a school bus bay per City Standards 2) Provide a focused Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue Mitigate traffic impacts to an acceptable level of service 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommurncations and electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to Final Map approval The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontage 4) Install Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan System 9 drainage facilities in Foothill Boulevard from Etiwanda Avenue to the existing terminus south of Tract 15711-1 Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of fees, for permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy This area is subtect to the modified fee adopted March 21, 2001 If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 5) Install local storm drain facilities as needed from the protect site to Foothill Boulevard Install manhole at publidpnvate function 6) Sumps in the private storm drain system shall be designed for 0100 Pond depth shall not exceed 12 inches 7) Provide an ingress/egress access easement in favor of Assessor Parcel Nos 227-211-22 and 227-211-23 8) Flow increases as a result of development shall be mitigated by enlarging Basin No 6 D~l~-lam H N d CAMINO REAL II APARTMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 16257, SITE UTILIZATION MAP ~r~~ ~nm .~~n. -s'- ~.a. CAMINO REAL II APARTMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 16257, SITE UTILIZATION MAP ~~ a~n^ .~~a. ~. z ~ a ° ~ ~ ~ <~~ag 1~ ~I~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~:~ ~ ~ Safi H ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~I~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~ U & d v ~ U ~ c,~ ~ d ° m ~ ~~ _ ~~ ~ • q d € ~! 9 ms9r~ f ~ ~d ~. a ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ Q O ~ y~~ae e o ~~:k ~' ~ A w a ~ ~~ I ~y o ~, 6 a E" 3r ` I A W,~ '~ ~ w - r, r. A , , ~ ~Q~a ~ ; i ~$' ~i ,y4` i m ~ I I ~ i ~o~' ~ ~~~~~ ~ o ' `- ~ ~ ~ I a r_ , ,~ i ~~~~ ~~ =`,=~-`' V[CIT7ITY MAP rmim ~~,~'t'i.~. HUY Dw (uw CAMINO REAL II APARTMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT 16257 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ~~ ~. ~ DETAIL SHEET ~ :~:z _'- ®~.~ R4f1 N ~ RG1q! c RtrcH e RCICM D R<+rH e Rcnou I (~ 1' ! ~ ~ ~•~ •~ ~ ("'~ it ~ '•i` J~~'+\ ` -- } h;~l,i '~`~ ~~ f ~, m_ - o • ~ ?~ ' is ~ a ~ x ) \`~' \\~\~ \ `i SI I ~ U \ \ ~ _ \ 8`Py~ ~\\ \ ~ ~ / ~ I e ~ a~Y H \ ~ d ~ \ ya j\\ ~ '~ u ~~ ~~ ~;vvs~~~~ , . , ~, \s~~ ~~Y } \ ~ \ \ \ \T ~\ \, r~-i pa i \\ \~ '~ ~ , I w ~~ I \\ z „ t~ ~ I U 3 r i ~~ - ~- Y `, ]o r ~ r ~,~ ' ,- { I . I ° x l i 5 ~ ~ ~~ ~ L ~•~, ~ A ~t i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ \ ~~~ ~__ ~,` \ \\ \j `~~ ~\ ~ ~ i ~ I ~_ J` / i -~--. f a~~~ ~~ ~ f --,~ - -'~, l,.f ~`~ __~~, _ .i ..,.,,,,y~-.,,, F i ~ ~ r 1/f 4> ~ ~ \ \ ~ \ ~ ~~ ~~ ~r \ r \'- .; ~ `~ ~~ b ~ \~ a~ P ~~~ ~~0 `• pa Y .Y'o e ~~ e \ ~ ~ Y= s~ ~ Y r Y Y _ ~~ ~~~ ++..wt'~5~ c~a -__- - z t •,~ i M \\' ~~®~ ;; z ., ~~ ' P. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,~~ ~~ ao ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~\ '~ \ t 4 ~ /" U O y z ~" rJ O ~~ v I ~ ~ ~.~ , ~ ~ I~~~ ~ H 4 I F ~.y-<_~ I~ ~ `~ ~ ~ % i z i ~] F o ) •E__/__~ ~J J ~ v ~ z w '~ ~ ~ ~ l C a ~ - ~ T ~ ~ d M ~ i ro, .. _ ., W ~-~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ - z ~ a~ ~ a a ~ a ~ ~ si ~ F14~1aE~a ~'t ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ aai~a{~ ~~ ' ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~I $$~j g~g ~ y~~i~aii~~~~fji~ I~~~ii~~{f~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . . . . ! i tl d 3 ! ! v tl C q d d q i ~F , w a~~ ~~~ ~. ~. . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ o®®~ A ~~~ .~ . ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ®oo ~~~ ... ~ ~~ ~k~ g aaa ~~~ ~~~ ~$a ~~~ ~~ Q~ i 1 i~ I[~ °~ ijy~~~. y ! q jAd ~! k A _ :=s„ - ~~ ~i ,ScFlhl ~® ~ w Outline for Requested Condrt~ons of Approval for proposed Etiwanda Apartments January 23, 2002 1 Requae developer to bring m water mains to support aty code for m~mmum fire hydrant spacing requirements for residential distracts 2 Requve developer to allow existing cul-de-sac to remain and allow adequate space at the west end of Chernl Street for safe turn around of fire trucks, trash trucks, utility trucks, etc through prescraptive easement rights 3 Requve developer to grant sewer access at each property or at the West end of Chervil Street to the proposed maximum density zoning of 14 units per acre 4 Mitigate requvements to the developer to pave and widen Chervil street to minimum fire access standards of 26' by granting land along the south-eastern portion of Chervil Street 5 Removal of plans for pedestrian side walks duectly behind the block wall that would border mine and my neighbors back yard property Imes This recommendation would be m an effort to mm~mize pedestrians from access to peer over or climb over our privacy wall 6 Reqwre location of apartment trash disposal dumpsters to be located at a distance from our property hoes to prevent unreasonable odor or debns from making its way onto our property 7 Reginre that proper light coverings be installed to prevent a v~s~ble glare of the light bulbs from our property and that the Lghts be placed far enough away from our property Imes to prevent unwanted night-time lighting from spilling over onto our properties 8 Requu•e that landscaping be provided along the border of our properties that would be adequate enough to provide pnvacy screening as well as the recommendation that a thorny vine or other wall chmbmg vine be strategically placed on the exterior block wall around our homes to prevent graffiti, vandalism, and discourage pedestrians from chmbmg the wall Sincerely, Dan/ie/l JSand`oval~ /~lJ~a~ ~Gti~l.~~~~ Resident of Chervil St ~-- ~/ j ~~) ~- Part II, Chap 6, Article 6 32 STATES the timing and phasing of facdihes such as roads, sewers, and water, regmre a logical phasing and service plan in order to minumze the cost of service to an area Cucamonga County Water D~strwt has conceded that rt would be logical to requue the developer to provide access points for sewer and water access for Sre hydrants to the adjacent properties in order to mmim~ze the cost ofservice to this area Ifth~s were not provided, CCWD determined that future installation of a sewer system would requve the installation of a pwnping station and the disruption of Etiwanda Ave for several feet to connect to sewer that route which would cost thousands of dollars more than connection through the sewer Imes being installed on the adjacent development TO: Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Undersigned Neighbors Surrounded by the 'Donut Project" PROJECT: Etiwanda Apartments DATE• January 23, 2002 We, the undersigned, urge the Commission not to take any action on Etiwanda Apartments, also referred to as the "Donut Project' by City staff and return it to the design review and technicel review committees for further evaluation. We believe that the staff report does not impose adequate conditions of approval on this Project, so, as to mitigate the severe impact that the Project has on the quality of life and property values of the single family residents within the "donut h ole°. We understand that projects such as the above that require discretionary approvals often have 'conditions of approval" imposed to protect the public health 8 welfare of adjacent property owners and ro protect property values and not impede future development of contiguous properties. In this regard, we believe major fire & safety Issues exist on Chervil Street. We believe this is the time to 'upgrade" tfiis street to a full residential street with adequate storm drainage, sewer, gas and water service. Currently, we have an approximately 15 foot dirt road with no sewer service and no adequate storm drainage. A dirt cul-de-sac on the Project site, serves as aturn-around for fire trucks, emergency vehicles and residents. This Is the time to condition the developer to dedicate the land necessary to widen the street and allow the City to provide adequate utility service that we taxpayers deserve We understand that you can require the developer to upgrade his infrastructure to accommodate this and future higher density on the 'donut hole' lots and that, If higher density occurs, a reimbursement agreement is put in place. Also, be aware that this development will eliminate the cul-de-sac, probably a prescriptive right of the homeowners along Chervil, thus eliminating the turn- around for fire 8 emergency vehicles. Also, there is no emergency escape if Chervil is blocked and appropriate emergency access ea~ments should be provided by the developer of the Project. We understand that the same issues exist for the Glover 8 Rawlings road easement off Etiwanda, as well. ~~ furthermore, we believe that the environmental study, prepared by the city consultant with subsequent proposed negative declaration', is woefully inadequate and has not addressed marry relevant issues raised by fellow resident Tracy Glover in her letter to the Commission dated January 9, 2002 in the City Consultant's Initial Environmental Study. Additionally, to us It appears that this Project has been "rushed through" the city planning process with virtually no input from the "donut hole" residents Specifically, our first contact with this Project was at a city sponsored neighborhood meeting on or about November 20 2001 where the developer presented his conceptual plan. This was the followed by the scheduled final vote by the Planning Commission on January 9, 2002. No one was provided with any additional information, except Don Glover on January S at Don Glover's request. As you know, the item was pulled from the January 9 meeting and another neighborhood meeting occurred on January 17. Except for the above, the 'donut hole' homeowners have been kept in the dark. We were not notified of any design review or technical review meetings. No meetings were held with the City Environmental Conwltant to solicit our questions and concerns. In this regard, we request that the Planning Commission delay any vote on this project tonight and that the city hold additional public meetings andlor public forums on the following: 1. 'urn as a one-story co^dominium development. Remember that this project was recently'up-zoned' to medium to high mufti-family density; our properties are zoned for low density apartments. 2. ~ he initial €,~.rironmental Studv by the City consultant on this Project. We believe the current initial study and proposed negative declaration is woefully inadequate and that public'scooping' meetings with the city consultant are necessary. 3, "conditions of approval' that may be pl on this project to protect our quality of life is we elect to remain or, if we are forced to move out, protect the development potential of our properties. We appreciate your understanding in these matters and hope you will consider the above requests. Sincerely, the undersigned: Name `\~-\ Name Address ~7cZS ~ ~.-C~w~rora Address x N ¢ /1 S' 3 9 ~_'Pf L K y!L ~ Address ~ ~e~.V1ww, MA /UY/`~( 7f11Y /~n'•'~~l ~1SS~d ~ 71 . Name Address Name Address • T H E C I T Y O F RANCNO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: January 23, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716-FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT-A public heanng to consider certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approving the Statement of Facts and Findings and the Statementof Ovemding Considerations for the proposed protect known as Victona Gardens, a mixed use development consisting of approximately 2 45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses, as well as up to 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land The protect site is within the City boundary and the Victona Community Plan and is generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west - APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 ABSTRACT. The project was continued from January 9, 2002, to this meeting at the request of the applicant The purpose of this heanng is for the Planning Commission to review the report, receive testimony, and forward a recommendation of certifying the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopting the Statement of Facts and Findings and the Statement of Ovemding Considerations to the City Council BACKGROUND The protect site is within the Victoria Community Plan where a regional mall was planned since the inception of the Community Plan in 1981 In November of 1984, a supplemental EIR was certified by the City Council for the development of a 1 2 million square foot traditional regional mall on 94 acres of land Last year, the Redevelopment Agency assembled the planned regional mall site and the additional land area around It, and created an opportunity for planning a new regional center that will serve the City today and future generations In July 2001, the City adopted a new General Plan where a Mixed Use designation was established forthe regional center site The purpose of the new Mixed Use designation is to stimulate and guide development in creating special urban places Forest City Development Company, in partnership with Lewis Operating Company, will be developing this new 175-acre mixed-use regional center The proposed ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT January 23, 2002 Page 2 regional center is known as the Victona Gardens and envisioned to be the "new downtown" and "main street" for the City The development scenano consists of a mixed use of retail, office, restaurants, entertainment, residential units, awc and cultural uses Because of the change in the zoning to Mixed Use and an increase in the density of the protect in acreage and square footage, a new Protect EIR was regwred ANALYSIS A Project EIR. The purpose of the Protect EIR is to evaluate any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from the development of a protect, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public partiapation Contents of the EIR become a planning tool and an information document for the Planning Commission and the City Counal to use in considenng the discretionary actions required for protect approval The EIR is also a public disclosure document available to agenaes and the public for review and comment before consideration of protect approval The certification of the Victona Gardens Protect EIR will provide environmental clearance for the project area Future discretionary actions for design review of buildings will be covered and will not require furtherenvironmental assessment. B. EIR Process for Victona Gardens: The EIR has been processed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1 Notice of Preparation (NOP). A NOP for the EIR was prepared by the City and distnbuted on March 7, 2001 The NOP, descnbing the proposed protect and issues to be addressed, was distnbuted to the State Cleannghouse, responsible agenaes, and other interested parties fora 30-day review penod. The purpose of a NOP is to identify and determine the full range and scope of environmental issues of concern so that these issues could be fully evaluated in the EIR Comments received dunng the NOP process have been addressed in the applicable sections of the EIR 2 Public Scopino Meeting The City held a Public Scoping Meeting at City Hall on Apnl 3, 2001 Responsible agenaes, properly owners within 600 feet around the project site, and key community representatives were invited to attend the meeting. Only one business representative plus City staff and representatives of the consultant and the applicant attended the meeting A Public Scoping Meeting is similar to a community open house where the proposed project was introduced to the public and comments were to be received The one attendee did not raise any environmental issues Notice of Completion and Availability for Draft EIR The Draft EIR was completed on September 21, 2001, and arculated according to CEQA regwrements with the 45-day public review penod ending on November 5, 2001 The Notice of Availability for the public review was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on December 21, 2001 A copy of the Draft EIR was made available to the public at the City Planning Division and Library A total of six agenaes provided wntten comments on the draft EIR and one letter was received from an attorney representing three residents in the City Our consultant, LSA, prepared responses to each environmental related comment received, which are included in the Final EIR F2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT . January 23, 2002 Page 3 4. Mitigation Mondonng Program (MMPI• Incompliance with CEQA, the City has prepared a momtonng program as shown in Exhibit "C." The MMP is a reporting program, which identifies each mitigation measure or the required changes in the project design that reduce the significance level of a particular impact The MMP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure Statement of Facts and Findings and Statement of Ovemding Considerations CEQA states that the City cannot approve any protect for which an EIR was prepared, which identifies one or more significant impact, unless certain findings are made and statement of facts are considered If the significant unavoidable environmental impacts result with a project, the City must balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental nsks in determining whether to approve the protect If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of ovemding considerations. A Statement of Facts and Findings and a Statement of Ovemding Considerations are prepared for this project as shown in the attached proposed City Council Resolution. C Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigations This section summanzes those identified significant environmental impacts resulting from the proposed protect and the mitigation . measures being recommended to reduce the impact to an insignificant level Other environmental issues or impacts identified with a determination of no mitigation are listed in the EIR Traffic: Impact The project will have an increase in traffic A Traffic Study (Congestion Management Program Traffic Impact Analysis - CMP/TIA) was prepared, which concludes that 28 intersections and freeway interchanges, as well as 3 freeway segments, are impacted and wtll be operating at an unsatisfactory level of service with the development of the project at the projected years of 2007 and 2020 They are listed below The CMP/TIA study also determined the fair share contnbutions to the impacts and the corresponding traffic fees for the improvements as mitigation measures thatwill reduce the impacts to an acceptable level 6 Intersections within Project Area: Day Creek Boulevard/Base Line Road Day Creek BoulevardNictona Gardens Lane Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard Victona Gardens Lane/Base Line Road Victona Gardens Lane/Church Street Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street Mitigation A Community Facilities District (CFD) was formed recently to provide infrastructure improvements for both the Victona Gardens regional center and the Victona Arbors village The infrastructure improvements include all the above listed intersections for the regional center and the developer is regwred to partiapate in the CFD F3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT January 23, 2002 • Page 4 12 Intersections outside Project Area but within City: Archibald Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Haven Avenue/Base Line Road Milliken Avenue/Base Line Road Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Milliken Avenue/Arrow Route Milliken Avenue/4th Street Rochester Avenue/Arrow Route Day Creek Boulevard/Summit Avenue Day Creek Boulevard/Highland Avenue Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route Etiwanda Avenue/4th Street (San Bemardmo Road) Mitigation• The developer is regwred to pay theirfair share of transportation fees in the sum of $296,181 However, the developer requested to pay the transportation fees for the Etiwanda/Foothill Boulevard intersection only ($67,720) and not pay the remainder mitigation fees because it would render the protect financially infeasible for development The developer has submitted apro-forma economic protection of development cost and estimated returns forthe pro/ect and independently reviewed by the City, which showed that the additional mitigation costs beyond the budgeted amounts in the pro-forma would • make this protect economically undesirable and the protect would not be developed The above-mentioned 11 intersections mitigations are notfeasible and consequentiythe impact is significant and unavoidable and will be further discussed in Section D of this report. (See Exhibit "E") 8 Freeway interchanges within City: Milliken Avenue/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps I-15 Freeway Southbound Rampsl4th Street I-15 Freeway Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard I-15 Freeway Northbound Ramps/Base Lme Road I-15 Freeway Ramps/Base Line Road East Avenue/Base Line Road Mitigation The mitigation is for the developer to pay their fair share of traffic fees in the sum of $4 8 million ($4,801,482) Approximately $4 54 million is for the 1-15 Freeway Ramps/ Base Lme Road and East Avenue/Base Line Road improvements The City has committed to perform these improvements at no cost to the protect However, the developer requested to pay the traffic fees for the I-15 Freeway Southbound/Foothill Boulevard ($86,807) but not to pay the remainder mitigation fees ($170,675) because it will render the protect financially infeasible for development The developer sled the same reasons as above The above-mentioned 5 freeway interchanges mitigation are not feasible and consequently the impact is significant and unavoidable and will be further discussed in Section D of this report F'~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT January 23, 2002 Page 5 2 Intersections Outside City: Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue Cheny Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Mitigation. The developer is regwred to pay traffic fees in the sum of $63,224 3 Freeway Segments: I-15 Freeway northbound between State Route 60 to Duncan Canyon Road I-10 Freeway eastbound from Vineyard Avenue to I-15 Freewayfrom EUwanda Avenue to Cherry Avenue SR-210, from Carnelian Street to Day Creek Boulevard, from ChenyAvenue to East Avenue Mitigation The fair share cost of the improvements for the above freeway mitigation is approximately $2 12 million Currently, the improvements are under the authonty of the State Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) There is no mechanism to collect the traffic fees to contnbute to the improvement, there and there is no way to ensure that such fees are dedicated the specific freeway improvements Further, the developer sled that the imposition of the mitigation will render the protect financially infeasible for the same reasons as mentioned above Consequently, the impact is significant and unavoidable and wdl be further discussed in Section D of this report 2. Noise: The EIR identifies that noise levels will be increased from the construction activities and from the increased traffic with the development of the protect Mitigation The EIR finds that implementation of the mitigation measures listed in Exhibit "B"will reduce the impact to a level of insignificance 3. Air Quality: The short tens and long term air quality impacts as a result of the development of the protect will exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) Mitigation The EIR finds that the short tens impacts coming from grading and construction activities with mitigation cannot be reduced to an insignificant level, and the emissions from increased vehicular tnp with mitigation wdl continue to exceed the SCAQMD threshold of significance This is an unavoidable impact that will be further discussed in Section D of this report 4. Schools: The protect area is within the Etiwanda School Distnct and Chaffey Joint Union High School Distnct Future residential development wdl cause an increase of 306 students Mtigation The developer wdl pay the statutory school fees to the two school distncts subiect to Government Code Section 65995 et seq ~s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT January 23, 2002 Page 6 5. Police and Fire Services: The development of the protect will place considerable demand on law enforcement and fire protection services Mitigation: The EIR finds that the implementation of fire protection mitigation measures will reduce the impactto an insignificant level With respectto lawenforcementservice, the developer is regwred to submit a Public Safety and Secunty Plan that identifies the safety services provided to the project by the developer, which will supplement the normal City Police Services D Unavoidable Impacts: As outlined in the section above, air quality and traffic are the two environmental impacts that are significant and unavoidable The EIR finds that the air quality will exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance even with implementation of mitigation measures With respectto the traffic impacts, the developerhassubmitted apro- forrna economic projection of the development cost with the estimated returns for the project, and independently reviewed by the City, which showed that the additional mitigation costs beyond the budgeted amounts in the pro-forma would make this project economically undesirable and the protect would not be developed As discussed previously, the City must balance the benefits of the proposed protect against its unavoidable environmental nsks in determining whether to approve the protect If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of ovemding concerns. A Statement of Facts and Findings and a Statement of Ovemding Considerations has been prepared for Planning Commission review. E Alternatives Considered As regwred by CEQA, a total of four alternatives were evaluated The "No Build" alternative is no development for the protect site The "Enclosed Mall" alternative include 1 5 million square feet for the core retail and the reduction to half of the residential, office and retail uses for the outlying areas around the core The "Increased Retail/Cmc" alternative is to have all retail use and the same size avic use as the proposed protect The "Increased Residential" alternative is to have 100 acres for residential use vinth the remaining acres for retail, office, and civic uses In companng the alternatives to the proposed project, the EIR finds that the "Enclosed Mall" is environmentallysupenor because it is only 81 percent of the proposed protect However, the "Enclosed Mall" alternative is not a viable project in todays economic environment, according to the developer It does not meet the objective of the "Proposed Project" in creating a successful and unique urban village that is within a regional retail environment, set in shady, landscaped streets with a feel of walkable main streets and stnking mountain vistas The City's vision in the General Plan and it's Economic Development Element is to create such a unique urban village as the proposed protect It will encourage and conveniently draw residents from the northerly Victona Arbors Village, the community and the region who will enjoy a great vanety of activities from shopping to eating and relaxing Therefore, the "Proposed Project" will become a mator regional landmark that offers lifestyle choices not previously available in the City, strengthen the economic base of the City, minimize economic "leakage" to surrounding areas, and provide direct and indirect stimulation of other economic investments in the City CEQA allows the City to balance the economic, social, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental nsks where the adverse impacts may be considered "acceptable " ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT January 23, 2002 . Page 7 F Conclusion Based on the above analysis, staff concluded that the EIR has been prepared in compliance with CEQA Staff also determines that the economic and soaal benefits outweigh the adverse impacts To approve the proposed protect, a Statement of Facts and Findings and a Statement of Ovemding Considerations would need to be adopted by the City Councl CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine the Environmental Impact Report for Victona Community Plan Amendment 10-01, Development Agreement 01-02, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 to be complete and adequate and forward a recommendation to the City Council to certify the EIR and adopt a Statement of Facts and Findings and Ovemding Considerations Respec !y submitt , • Bra utter City Planner BB NF mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" -Protect Area Map Exhibit "B" - Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation Exhibit "C" -Mitigation Monitonng Plan (MMP) Exhibit "D" -Final EIR (Document Transmitted Separately) Exhibit "E" -Letter from Applicant Resolution Recommending EIR Certification Proposed City Council Resolution Certifying the EIR and Adopting a Statement of Facts and Findings and Ovemding Considerations • F ~- r ~c r r r r I . _ -z. RESIDENTIAL ,~,. -~ _ .. , s - ~ .:~_._:,~ ~ -.-~- ~y ~e v O R30 500 n rr LSA ^ RESIDENTIAL ® REGIONAL MALL ^ OUTPARCELS EXHIBIT "A1" PROJECT AREA MAP FIGURE 3.2 Vidono Gardens Probed EIR Development Are• Fa n ~HIBIT "A2" COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15716 VICTORIA GARDENS N T£ dfY OF NANCFp gICAMpq~ COIRRT OF BNI ~NAipp, 8fA7E OF GLFOINC IaTMx A awwmNl w rulau xo T1AauGN a acW9Y[ w MsIII NY N) IaMI N Ks NA. iaID N aNR In w rYfII YYS AI IIC(] n TINNILX t40 NCWSM. /Nm LLV IR x/Y f11xD N a00[ N w /NIL'R Y4a 1T r.LD 1 1MOWN x NftVSITf 40 IORIUMx w NOCY Y w [ll'INM CIXpR 1/J07x tl IG Y4 Im'Olmm M IOOIt L rx¢ x/ w Ilw; /u gJgpx w LN pxNmyq fCIN11 nJrz w wuopK 110. >ml MASTER SITE PLAN ~~ IMi IfA - to 101! dVL B0.T~i asNQ sus L- -J ~~~' •_•_~ C~ EIR FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL 15716 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION Exhibit "B" Flo - - - - i a ex ive el L9A A A9P] INC UCCCM ]001 FINA1 Cla VICTORIA OARUCN! 1 0 P(CCUTI VP fUMMAaY y - -..6~uu.,.pprtG Less Than Significant Impacts The addition of project traffic to year 2007 and year 2020 condrtwns will not have a significant Impact on the prgect access driveways on Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Victoria Gardens Lane, and Foothill Boulevard Analyses of the project driveways under year 2007 with pro)ect and year 2020 wrth project condrtmns indicate that all pro)ect access driveways well operate wnh satisfactory levels of service based on the tum restrictions and stop control proposed as part of the pro)ect Consequently, Impacts at the proposed pro/ect driveways are considered to be less than significant -n Potentially SIgnlBcanf Impacts i / Year 2007 W~(h Pro/ect /ntersecnon Condurons Impact 4.1 1 Gleven TSn intersections are forecast to operate below the LOS threshold (C for intersections entirely within Fontana, D for others) under year 2007 wrth pro)ect conditions in the a m and/or p m peak hour These mterseclmns are as follows • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps • Day Creek Boulevard/Victoria Gardens Lane • Day Creek Boulevard/FoothillBouievard • Vtctona Gardens Lane/Base Llne Road • Victoria Gardens Lane/Church Street • Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route • Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue • 1-1 S Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road • 1-I S Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road R \CRGI31\Fiml EIR\Table 1-A_Flnal4 dac (12/19/01) No mmgatwn is regwred 4.1.IA The protect shall make a fair share contribution Less than significant to following improvements • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps - Addition of a free southbound right tum lane • Day Creek Boulevard/VictoriaGarderis Lane - Addition of a free northbound right mm lane hort ea abound •re n.,.,~s ohsse_kll necessitate orohibmm~ o estnan crossino f n r i, n i •nuth I ¢ of this int rsertion ~ae~ IoR. 1-5 l L]A A]]OCIATP] INC DLCCM R[R ]001 • Cherry Avenue/Foothdl Boulevard The prgect creates or contnbutes to these unsatisfactory conditions, which is considered to be a sigmticant impact R \CRGI)1\Final EIR\Table 1-A_Flnal4 da (11/19/01) lINA1 !1 VICTORIA OA0.D[N xecurlTe sou u.l Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - Addition of a free westbound nght loin lane, which wdl continue to become ilia free northbound nght loin lane at Day Creek BoulevardNictona Gardens Lane Conversion of one northbound left loin lane to a northbound through lane Addition of a free nonhbound right loin lane, which will continue to become a dedicated nght loin lane at 1-I S Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard Addition of a third southbound left loin lane Conversion of southbound shared though/nght loin lane to e dedicated southbound nght loin lane Modification of signal phasing to provide nght loin overlap phasing Cor southbound nght loin movement ~s ap alternative to the nverino ..6•~.~.. a free (uncontrolled) nght loin for this movement would improve overall mterseMion operations slightly and permit eastbound U-toms, although a LOS calculation will show greater average delay for controlled movements This signal will need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to tom left Shea Coordination of signal timing with Day Creek BoulevardNictonaGardans Lane shall be implemented to provide maximum use of • ~~ L9A A~AI P9 INC OCCLN ]OEI PINA1 PI! VIC I'ORIA OARDINa I o exeeD nve auu u... ,l i • Vlctona Gardens LandBase Lme Road- Conversion of planned northbound shared through/nght tom lane to a free nght loin lane Addluon of a dedicatwn eastbound nght [um lane • Vlctona Gardens Lane/Church Street - Modification of signal phasing to provide nght loin overlap phasing for northbound nght loin movement • Etiwanda Avenue/An-ow Route -Addition of a second northbound through lane • Etiwanda Avrnue/Slover Avenue -Addition of a second southbound left loin lane and a free westbound nght loin lane • Cherry AvenudFoothdl Boulevard - Addition of a second southbound IeR loin lane Tfiis mitigation wdl maintain the level of service at this intersection at its 2001 level, which did not meet the City of Fontana's LOS C standard R \CRG131\FInaI EIR\Table 1-A_Flnal4 doD (I L19/01) I _~ - - -- ~ ..~ !3A A930 CIAT l9 INC DPCIN!!0. 3001 ~ tlti I~ A ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ f~ ~1 PINAI PI0. VICTORIA CARpP NR 1 C IIC CUTI VC RUM MARY • Interstate IS Northbound from lurupa Street to 1-IO • Interstate 10 Eastbound from Archibald Avenue to I- IS • Interstate 10 Eastbound from Etiwanda Avenue to Cherry Avenue The prolect creates or conhibutes to these unsatisfactory T conditions, which Is considered to be a significant impact 11 Year 2020 With Project Intersection Conditions Impact 4.1.3 Twenty-axle tight intersections are forecast to operate below the LOS threshold (C for intersections entirely within Fontana, D for others) under year 2020 with prolect conditions to the a m and /or p m peak hour These intersections are as follows • Archibald AvenudFoothdl Boulevard • Haven Avenue/Base Line Road • Milliken AvenueJSR-210 Eastbound Ramps • Mllhken Avenue/Base Line Road • Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard • Milliken Avenue/Arrow Route • Mllhkrn Avenue/4th Street • Rochester AvrnudAmow Route • 1-IS Southbound Ramps/4th Sheet • Interstate I S from luropa Street to 1-10 - Addton ofone northbound HOV lane • Interstate 10 from Archibald Avenue to 1-I S - Addition of one eastbound mixed-flow lane • Interstate 10 from Etiwanda Avenue to Valley Boulevard -Addition ofone eastbound HOV lane • Interstate 10 from Valley Boulevard to Cherry Avenue -Addition ofone eastbound mixed flow lane end one eastbound HOV lane 4.1.3A The prolect shall make a fair share contribution tD the following improvements • Archibald Avrnue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a dedicated eastbound tight tum lane, a dedicated northbound right tum lane, end a second southbound left tum lane • Haven AvenueBase Line Road -Addition of a third eastbound through lane and a second eastbound left Nm lane • Milliken AvenuelSR-210 Eastbound Ramps - Addition of a free northbound tight tum lane • Milliken Avenue/Base Line Road -Addition of a third eastbound through lane and a third southbound through lane • Milliken Avrnue/Foothlll Boulevard - Addition of a third eastbound through lane, a third and a fourth southbound through lanes, and a dedicated Less than significant R \CRGi~nal EIR\Table I-A_FInRl4 doc (12/19/01) Impact 4.1.2 Three freeway segments are forecast to operate below the LOS E threshold under year 2007 with 4 1.2A The addition of the following freeway lanes There are no feas161e mitigation measures for these prolect conditions in the a m and /or p m peak hour would maintain freeway operations under year 2007 Impacts The Impacts remain significant and These segments are as follows with prolect conditions at acceptable levels of service unavoidable L!A A~ATP! INC DPCP 1001 i ~. ~. ~, YINAI PIR VIOI O0.IA CARDIN! I 0 Pa ICUIIVY IUM NARV • Uay Creek Boulevard/SR-2I0 Westbound Ramps • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps • Day Creek Boulevard/F{ighland Avenue • Day Creek Boulevard/Baze Line Road • Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane • Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard • I-IS Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard • Vlctona Gardens Lane/Base Lme Road • Victona Gardens LandChurch Street • Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street • Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard • Etiwanda Avenue/Amow Route • Etiwanda Avenue/San Bemardmo Avenue • Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue • 1-i S Southbound RampsBase Line Road • East AvenueBaze Llne Road • I-IS Northbound RampsBaze Line Road • Cherry Avenue/Foothill Boulevard The prgect creates or contnbutes to these unsatisfactory conditions, which is considered to be a significant impact R \CRG 131\Final EIR\Tablc I-A_Final4 doc (Ib19/0I) northbound right turn lane • Mllltken Avenue/Artow Route -Addition of a second eastbound IeR tutu lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a fourth northbound through lane • Mdhken Avenue/4th Street -Addtuon of a thud southbound IeR tutu lane Modification of signal phazmg to provide tight tutu overlap phasing for northbound nghttum movement • Rochester Avenue/Arrow Route -Conversion of second northbound IeR tutu lane to a second northbound through lane • 1-IS Southbound Ramps/4th Street -Addition of a free southbound tight tutu lane Modification of signal phasing to provide tight tutu overlap phasing for northbound nghttum movement • Day Creek Boulevard/Summit Avenue -Addition of dedicated northbound and southbound tight tutu lanes • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps - Constmction of sloop off-mmp for westbound SR- 210 tmfFic exiting south onto Day Creek Boulevard • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps - Addmon of a Ree northbound nghttum lane Conversion of eastbound shared IeR tum/through/nght tutu lane to a shared through/nghttum lane • Day Creek Boulevard/Highland Avenue -Addition of dedicated northbound and southbound tight tutu lanes Conversion of westbound shared through/nght tutu lane to a dedicated tight tutu lane Modificatwn of signal phasing to provide right tutu overlap phasing for westbound tight tutu movement 1-9 1 ]A A]]OCI ATl9 INC DICGNBPR ]001 PINAL !I0. 1'ORIA DARDIN! UTIVP ]UYYA[1 11 l • Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane - Addition of a free northbound nght turn lane Short eastbound green phase will necessitate prohibition of pedestrian crossing of Day Creek Boulevard on the south leg of this intersection • Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - Addition of afree westbound nght ruin lane, which well continue to become the free northbound nght ruin lane at Day Creek BoulevardNictoriaGardans Lane Conversion of one northbound IeR ruin lane to a northbound through lane Addition of a free northbound nght ruin lane, which will continue to become a dedicated right ruin lane at 1-I S Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard Addition of a third southbound left ruin lane Conversion of southbound shared though/nght ruin lane to e dedcated southbound nght ruin lane Modification of signal phasing to provide nght turn overlap phasing for southbound right ruin movement As an alternative to the overlag Qhasma. a free (unconholled) nght ruin for this movement would Improve overall intersection operations slightly and permit eastbound U-rums, although a LOS calculation will show greater average delay for controlled movements This signal will need to bt operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to rum left ~ Short westbound through green phase will regwrc pedestnans crossing Day Creek Boulevard on the north leg of [his mtersectlon to cross to ~ median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedestnan signal and an ei ht-foo R \CRG 171\Final EIR\Teble 1-A_Flnal4 doe (11/19/01) • • ~-)0 of a second eastbound left ruin lane and a second westbound left ruin lane - . ttttttr. ~ 1~ i ~ ~ un n~res inc oeee vssl tum lane at Vlctona Gardens Lane to provtde suftictent queuing capacity for southbound IeR ruin movements (See Figure 4 1 I S) ~~ +ntersesgert'Coordmation of signal timing with Day Creek BoulevardNictonaeardens Lane shall be Implemented to provtde maztmum use of 'J • 1-IS Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard - Addmon of afree eastbound nght ruin lane • Vlctona Gardens LaneBaze Line Road - Converston of planned northbound shared lhrough/nght ruin lane to a free nght ruin lane • Vlctona Gardens Lane/Church Street - Addition of e second westbound left ruin lane Modification of signal phasing to provtde nght ruin overlap phazing for northbound nght ruin movement • Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street - Addition of e dedicated northbound left ruin lane, resulting in a single IeR ruin lane and a single shared through/nght ruin lane Addwon of a dedicated eastbound left ttnn lane, resulting m a single left PINn~ vicroun cna NeNs ~ e uecun vP auu Nw.v R \CRG I71\Ftnzl EIR\Table 1-A Fina14 doc (12/19/01) ) -~ 1 19A A990CIAI P9 INC U[C[M 9[[ ]001 ~+, ~]r-' lane, resulting m a single IeR loin lane and a single shared through/nght loin lane • Euwanda Avenue/Foothdl Boulevard - Addmon of a second southbound through lane, a second northbound through lane, and a second northbound IeR loin lane Modificatwn of signal phasing to provide right loin overlap phazing for the northbound right loin movement • Euwanda AvenudArtow Route -Addition of a second northbound through lane, a second southbound through lane, a second eastbound through lane, a second eastbound IeR loin lane, a second westbound IeR loin lane, and a dedicated northbound right loin lane • Euwanda AvenudSan Bemardmo Avenue - Addrtwn of a second eastbound Ieft loin lane • Euwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue -Addition of a third and a fourth northbound through lane, a second eastbound IeR mm lane, a second southbound IeR loin lane, a second westbound IeR loin lane, and a Cree westbound nght turn lane These miugauons will maintain the level of service at this intersection at rts 2001 level, which did not meet the City of Ontario's LOS D standard • I-IS Southbound and Northbound RampsBase Line Road -Freeway interchange must be reconstructed to include southbound and northbound loop on-ramps Plans for the reconstruction of this interchange are currently being prepared by Calirans, SANBAG, and the City oCRancho Cucamonga The reconstruction of this interchange wdl include the reconstmction of the intersection of East Avenue and Base Lme Road • East Avenue/Base Line Road - Mrtigahon at this PINAI PIR VICTOIIA 6ARU[N9 1 9 LE[CUTIVL 9UMMA0.Y R \CRG 131\Final EIR\Table I-A Final4 da (17/19/01) ~ _) 2 L!A A9~lP! INC DpC[Yp IERI YINA1 pIR VICI ORIA DAR OC N! 1 0 C%PCUt'I VP IUYYARY ~_ Year 2020 With Protect Freeway Conditions Koad interchange reconslmchon Cherry Avenue/Foothdl Boulevard - Addition of e second eastbound IeR ruin lane, a dedicated eastbound right ruin lane, a second southbound IeR ruin lane, a dedicated northbound right ruin lane, and a dedicated westbound right ruin Zane These mmgations wdl maintain the level of servtce at this intersection at its 2001 level, which did not meet the Gty of Fontana's LOS C standard Impact 4.1 4 Six freeway segments are forecast to operate 4 1.4A The addition of the following freeway lanes below the LOS E threshold under year 2020 with project would maintain Creeway operations under year 2020 conditions to the a m and /or p m peak hour These with project conditions at acceptable levels of servtce segments are as follows • • Interstate I S Northbound Rom SR-60 to Duncan Interstate I S from SR-60 to Duncan Canyon Road -Addrtton of one northbound mixed-flow lane and Canyon Road one northbound HOV lane • Interstate 10 Eastbound from Vineyard Avenue to I- • Interstate 10 from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald I5 Avenue - Addition of one eastbound mixed-flow • Interstate 10 Eastbound from Etiwanda Avenue to lane Cherry Avenue • Interstate 10 from Archibald Avenue to Mdhken • Interstate 10 Westbound from 1-15 to Mdhkan Avenue - Addition of two eastbound mixed-Row Avenue lanes • State Route 210 Eastbound from Camelinn Sheet Day • Interstate 10 from Milliken Avenue to 1-IS - Creek Boulevard Addmon of two eastbound mixed-flow lanes and one westbound mixed-Row lane 10 Eastbound hom Cherry Avenue to • . East Avrnue Interstate 10 from Ehwanda Avenue to Cherry Improvements to I-10 and 1-I S ere under the authority of Celtrans However, there Is no mechanism for development project proponents to pay fees or make fair share contributions towards Improving mainline freeway lanes, and even tf there were such a mechanism, there Is noway to ensure that such payments would be directed to a specific freeway Improvement project Consequently, there are no feasible mitigation measures for these Impacts and the prgect's impacts on the Reeways remain slgnificantand unavoidable R ~CRG I71~FInal EIR\Table 1-A_Final4 dac (12!19/01) J -~ 3 ..RRS a+rat• tt~m w Len neeomnree INc oeeeu eea reel ~ ~ ~ ~ rlNnl en VICl O0.1A CARD PND I 0 PxtC UtIVY 0.UMMARY Less Than SIgnlBcant Impacts Parking Lot Activity. Representative parking activities, such az customer conversing or door closing, would generate intermittent, maximum noise levels of {..l approximately 60 dBA at 50 feet This level of noise is O much lower than that of the tratlic on the area roads or the loadmg/unloading of lmcks Therefore, rt is not anticipated that noise azsociated with the parking lot activities m the proposed commercial and office use areaz will have any significant impact on off-sae or on-site residences Transportation to Construction Site Impacts. Transport of construction equipment/materials to the protect site and worker commute would incrementally increase noise levels on access roads leading to the site Although there would be relatively high single event noise exposures (up to 87 dBA Lmax at 50 feet from pazsing trucks), when averaged over a longer penod o(time such az one hour or eight hours the effect in long-term ambient noise levels would be small and negligible Therefore, short-term construction noise impacts azsociated with worker commute and equipment transport would not result in significant adverse impacts on noiu sensrtrve receptors along the access routes leading to the proposed protect site Cumulative Impacts. The short-term constmction noise and long-term operational noise impacts (parking lot • State Route 210 from Cherry Avenue to East Avrnue - Addrtwn of one eastbound mixed-Flow lane No mmgatwn regwred No mitigation requved No mitigation regmred R \CRGU IV:rrul EIR\Table 4A_Final4 doe (ILI9/01) • s 1-14 i ~~ The protect creates or contnbutes to these unsatisfactory lanes and one eastbound HOV lane conditions, which is considered to be a slgniticant Impact State Route 210 from Carnelian Sheet to Day Creek Boulevard - Addition of one eastbound mixed-Flow lane .~+ ttttt~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ LJA A~ATP9 INC DPCPYB R SY01 11 N assoaated with the proposed prgect were determined to be less than significant The proposed pro)ect's short-term consnuchon activity and on-site stationary sources are localized noise sources and would only affect land uses immediately adjacent to the project site wnh duce[ tine of sight of the protect boundary These noise sources are not considered cumulative Constructton and operations (excluding vehicular traffic) at other off site locatwns would not cumulatively add to project related noise impacts Potentially SIgnlBeant Impacts Impart 4 2.1 Noise levels from grading and other construction activities for the proposed pro)ect may range up to 85 dBA Lmax at the closest planned residential uses to the north of the protect site for very limited times when construction occurs near them Construction noise impacts of the proposed protect would be potentially adverse Therefore, mitigation measures would be requved Impact 4.2.2: There will be a significant increase in pro)ect related tiaffic noise on Victona Park Lane from Base Line Road to south of Church Sneet In addition, proposed residrntial properties on the pro)ect site may be exposed to potentially significant traffic noise impacts ~~ r 4 2.1A Construction shall be limned to the hours of 6 30 a m through 8 00 p m on Monday through Saturday, excluding national holidays No construction shall be allowed on Sundays 4.2.1 B There shall be proper muffling of and maintenance of all internal combustion rngines for construction egwpment end vehicles used on the site 4.2.1C All statmnary noise generating sources, such as air compressors and portable power generators, shall be located as far away as possible from existing sensitive receptors 4.2.2A Residential amts located within 86 to 172 feet of the centerline of Day Creek Boulevard shall be equipped with building facade upgrades, such as double paned (or dual glazing) windows, and mechanical vrnhlahon, such as an air conditioning system. R \CRGI31\Flnal EIR\Teble I-A_FIna14 dot (12/19101) ~ s Las than significant Less than significant w . ~! PINAI PI0. VICTORIA OARDY N] _ 1 R PEPC111I VY ]UYYARY ~-)$ s --- ~ itttttiit tttttw >_ ~. w ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ S ~ r ti ,• L]A A]]OCIATP] INC DLCPNgPR 1001 PIMA1 PIR VICl Op1A pARD[N9 1 0 eEP CUIIVe ]UMMA0.Y The following mmganon measures arc regwred for off- srte sensitive uses that would experience potentially signtfiaant pro3ect related hafTic noise impacts 4 2 2C~ Sensitive receptors located along Victoria Gardens Lane within the proposed Victoria Arbors Vdlage may require a six foot sound wall tf outdoor land uses fall within 77 Ceet of the roadway A form of N mechanical venhlatioq such as air condmomng, wdl be Iv required if the residences are wrthm 165 feet of V¢tona Gardrns Lane The following mmgation measure is regwred for outdoor on-site uses which may be exposed to pro3ect related traffic noise 4.2.2p Outdoor playas and dining areas shall incorporate features to mask or reduce noise generated from prgect related tia(fic Speafically, the prgect design shall utthze water features (e g fountains), either alone, or in tandem with other noise-reducing features (e g ,vegetative screening, structural design), to reduce noise levels wrthm outdoor gathering and dining areas Impact 4.2.3: Noise levels Crom the truck delivery and 4.23A On-site residences located within 250 feet of loading/unloading activities for the proposed pro3ect may any loading dock shall be equipped with mechanical range up to 61 dBA Lmax at the closest residential uses vrnhlahon, such as an air condmomng system proposed on the pro)ect site Noise tmpacts from the truck delivery and loadmg/unloadmg activities would be 4.2J6 In accordance with Gtv Code Cectlnn t 7 t n nsn potentially adverse of the Performance Standard . no to din or unload n¢ R.\CRG131\Ftnal EIR\Table 1-A_Flnel4 d« (12119/01) Less than significant 1-16 4.2.2 B_ Resdential amts located within 364 feet o(the centerline of Day Creek Boulevard or within 99 feet of the centerline of Church Street shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air condmonmg system ..~. iti~ r.rr! sL ~ s S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ i.an na ~res iec oee ew sea tool riuni nx vice oain awxorea i e rxrrv nve auu uwev Cumulative Impacts. The cumulative study area for noise Impacts is the portions of the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Ontario and the unincorporated areas of the County of San Bernardino The short-tens construction noise and long-term operational noise Impacts (parking tat activity, loadmg/unloadmg activity, and traffic noise) associated with the proposed protect were determined to be less than significant The proposed project's short-term constroction activity and on-site stationary sources are localized noise sources and would only affect land uses Immediately adjacent to the prgect site wnh direct line of T sight of the protect boundary These noise sources are not 1 1 considered cumulative Construction and operations N (excluding vehicular traffic) at other off-srte locations would not cumulatively add to protect related noise impacts t€StflSnttal9sv_s14PmrRL No mmgahon is requved 4.3 AIR QUALITY Less than SlgniBcant Impacts Long Term Microscale Projections An assessment of project related impacts on localized ambient av quality requires that future ambient air quality levels be projected Because the proposed project would add new vehicular trips to future traffic volumes m the project vicinity, detenorahon m the level of service at adjacent mtersectwns would occur as a result of the proposed project Localized CO hot spot analysis Is regwred At many receptor locations, there would be a reduction in the CO concentrations with implementation of the project Because the composite CO levels would be below both the State and federal one hour and eight hour CO standards, these project related CO wncentration increases arc not considered significant No mrtigahon regmred R \CRG 131\Final I:IR\Table I-A_Finald doc (II/19/01) ) - j ~ •~ ~~ ~~ w !~ ! ~ I!A Al90CIA1'P] INC OLCLNE[R ]001 i M ~ S ~ !' r ~ ~ ~! ~ r PINAL PIl VIC I'ORIA pARnP N! Potentially SlgniBeant Impacts Short-Term Construction Related /mpacts Impact 4.3.1: Peak grading and construction emissions would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for the cntena pollutants of NOX and PM 10, which are 100 pounds per day and I50 pounds per day, respectively Emissions of other cntena pollutants would be below the standards 4.3.IA. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equpment used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency The Constroction Contrector shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment well be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications Short-term construction emissions would exceed the SCAQMD's daily thresholds for the cntena pollutants of NOx and PMIa Emissmns of other cntena pollutants would be below the standards Short-tens construction emisslons would remain sgmf cent with Implementation of mitigation measures Nr y 4 3 1 B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electnc or diesel powered equipment in lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut otf equipment when not in use During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction penod should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and egwpment operating et the same time 4.3.1 D. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction actrvnies so as not to interfere with peak hour tratiic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes ad/scent to the site, if necessary, a ^agperson shall be retained to maintain safety ad)acent to existing roadways 4 3.1 E. The Constmction Contractor shall support and encourage ndeshanng and transit incentives for the construction crew 43.1 F. Dust generated by the developmrnt activities shall be retained on site and kept to a minimum by R \CRG 131\Final EIR\Table I-A_Fina14 dac (17119/(11) C~ 1-18 i i ~^ ~ w ~ 1!A Al~~P9 INC n CCCYBCR ![ol s a r ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~s b During constmetion, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the late mooring and after work Is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds I S miles per hour 1 c ARer clearing, grading, earth moving, or (~ excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil 1 n shall be treated Immediately until the area Is paved or V otherwise developed so that dust generation wdl not occur d Soll stockpiled for more than twa days shall be covered, kept mast, or treated with soil borders to prevent dust generation e Trucks transporting sod, sand, cut or fill materials, and/or constmctwn debris to or from the site shall be Carped from the point of origin 4.3.1 G. The Construction Conhactor shall utdiu as much as possible precoated/natuml colored building materials, water based or low VOC coating, and coating transferor spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as a high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings epphcation such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge ~ ~~ PINA1 rla VICr 00.1A OAROCN! 1 O C]IICIII IVG [VYYA[V r R \CRG I71\Final EIR\Table LA_Final4 don (17/19/01) ) _) 9 a During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease L9A A990CIAIC9 ING 0ECCY EC0. IOYI PINAI PIM VIC I'ORIh CA0.DPN! _. 1 0 ClIEC11TIVP IUY YAaY N Impact 4 3 2: Long-tens au pollutant emission Impacts ere those azsoclated with changes In permanent usage of the protect site Area sources include on-site emissions such az natural gas consumption and emissions associated with consumer products Mobile source emtsslons result from vehicle tops associated with the proposed prgect 4 3.2A The protect shall comply wnh Title 24 of the Callfomla Code of Regulations established by the Energy Commission regarding energy conservation standards 4.3.28. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM), such as preferential parking for vanpooltng/carpooling, subsidy for transit pass or vanpoohng/carpoohng, Ilextime work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and on-sne cafeteria, shall be incorporated to the design of the eommerclal land uses 4J.2C. Prewlre houses for electrical charging EV cars, If feasible all conduits for fiber ooticsfor reslde~l and non- CCStdsnLa~ Mtgs. 4.3.2D Install EV chargers or alternative fuel stations (natural gas) for commumry wtde uu at key commercial and public location(s) 4.3.2E. The developer shall conhact with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance with and Implementation of the mmgation monitoring program R \CRG131\Final EIR\Table I-A_Final4 doc (IL19NI) 1-20 I~ A!lP9 IN UCCCYCYR lOl1 111 Cumulative Impacts. The cumulative study area far air quality impacts encompasses the Basin, which is designated nonattamment for ozone, PM 10, and CO Operational emissions associated wrth the proposed prgect m canfunction wrth bmld out of the Crty's General Plan will result m significant, cumulative au quahty impacts within the Basin Emission of NOX from construction of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to regional ozone formation Because the Basin is e nonattamment zone for ozone, this is a significant air quahty impact Emissions of criteria pollutants and fugrtrve dust from constmchon actrvity would result m mostly localized arr qualrty impacts m the prgect vicinity I[ is not anticipated that construction at other off-site locations would add to the protect related localized air quahty impacts ~~ ~ ~ 111111111 Mitigation proposed for the project will help reduce Significant and unavoidable cumulative au quahty impacts on the regional au basin but will riot reduce the cumulative impacts to a less than significant level AI P1~ VICIC[IA CA[O CN! 1 Y CXYCIIIIVY IUYYARY Both long-term stationary (on-srte energy consumption) -->~ and mobile (vehicular haffic) sources would contribute to N regional criteria pollutant emissions Because the Basin is a nonattamment zone for ozone and CO, these emissions would cumulatively conhibute to significant regional av quahty impacts 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Less than SlgniBcant Impacts Impacts to On-Site Dreinage A drainage course exists on srte that is presumed to be)unsdichonal non-wetland waters of the U S ,per previous studies conducted on a portion of the same drainage directly to the north m the Victoria Arbors pro)ect A~unsdicnonal delineation wdl be conducted for the proposed prgect srte to determine the hmrts and acreage of any waters subject to )unsdiction by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and CDFG under Sections 1601-1603 of the California Fish and Game Code Impacts to the drainage will not be considered significant due to the fact that the drainage is non-wetland waters and that the drainage is isolated from other wetland waters Adherence to measures set forth by all applicable permits wdl eliminate any associated R \CRG13I\Final EIR\Table I-A Final4 doc (11/19101) No mrtigahon is regwred 1-21 s ~s as ~ L9.]A]]OCI AI P] INC O CCCY ]CY ]001 impacts rwr ~ ! ~ ~g^I ~• ~ r~ ^~ ~ ~ ~ s! w Impacts to Special Interest Species. The results of the literature review mdteated the potential occurrence of 29 special interest plant and animal species m the protect vecinety Of these 29 species, 21 are considered absent based on the lack of suitable habitat or based on focused survey results Of the remaining 8 species, 2 are present, 2 are considered to have a moderate to high probability of occurrence, and 4 are considered to have a low probabelity of occurrence The special interest species occumng or potentially occurring on the proect site include • Plummers mariposa lily (Calochortus plummerae) • Parry's spmeflower (Chonmthe parryi var parryQ • Pansh's desert thorn (Lyceum panshu) • San Diego homed lezard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvellei) • Orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophoms [~ hyperthrus) lY • Western masnf bat (Eumops perotes cahfomicus) • Western burrowing owl (Athene cunecularea hypugea) • Bell's sage sparow (Amphispiza belle belle) San Bernardino Kangaroo Ret (SBKR). The SBKR (Dipodomys memame parvus) was emergency listed as rndangered on fanuary 27, 1998 (USPWS, 1998) and final listed on September 24, 1998 The site es wethm proposed cntecal habitat for thes speaes The habnat of the SBKR is described as being confined to premary and secondary alluvial fan scmb habitats, with sandy soils deposited by Ouvtal (water) rather than aeohan (wind) processes The focused trapping survey for the SBKR revealed that the species does not occur on the protect site No metiganon is regwred No mmganon is regwred Califomla gnatcatcher. The Cahfomia gnatcatcher is a No mmgatton is regmred small Insectivorous bird found almost exclusively within coastal sage scmb habnat from Los Angeles County south to upper Bata Cahfomta. The Cahfomia gnatcatcher was IINAI PI0. vl CTO0.1A OA0.U[N] O E[ECUTIVE RUMMARY R \CRG 131\Flnal EIR\Table 1-A_FIna14 da (12I19N I) i i 1-22 ~• ••• ••• .•. s ~^s w~ ~.r .s ws aul~ r r . ^r r ~ a L]A A]]O~P9 IHC ~ YIMA1 PI DPCPM aP0. ]401 VICI ORIA CARDP M] __ 1 4 Cxa CU 11 vP ]UMYA0.Y to upper Ba)a Cahfomla The California gnatcatcher was listed under the federal ESA as a threatened species on March 25, 1993 The sne is not within critical habitat for [he California gnatcatcher The Cahfomla gnatcatcher critical habitat is approximately one and a half miles to the northwest The entire site was surveyed for the presence of the California gnatcatcher The focused survey conducted for the Cahfomla gnatcatcher revealed that the species is not present on the pro)ect sne Habitat Fragmentatlon/Wfldlife movement. Habitat No mmgation is required fragmentation occurs when a single, unified habnat area is divided into two or more areas, such that the drvision isolates the two areas from each other Isolation of habitat limits the free movement of wildlife from one portion of habitat to another, or from one habitat type to another The wildlife movement on the Victoria Gardens site is mainly restricted to localized movements because linkages to sunoundmg habitats are limited by existing banters, primarily mayor roadways (Foothill Boulevard on the south N and the t-1 S on the southeast) and approved residential housing developments (to the north and west) No wildlife condor extends, or is m proximity, to the habitat of the proposed proect site The habitat on site is disjunct and m a highly urbanized area Therefore, ilia proposed pro)ect will not result in significant impacts on wtldltfe movement routes or conmbute to habitat fragmentation Local And Regional Policles/MSHCP. The proposed No mnigation is required proect would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting bwlogical resources Local Ordinance Protecting Biological Resources. The No mitigation is requred Qty of Rancho Cucamonga has a tree preservation ordinance to protect heritage trees, including all eucalyptus windrows and trees m excess of 15 feet m height The windrows of eucalyptus trees and the individual eucalyptus tree in the center of the site fall under the defnitton of heritage trees The tree ordinance allows for [he removal of heritage trees by filing a Tree Removal Permit with the City Planner Removal of the eucalyptus trees is not considered significant and no mitigatwn is regwred R \CRG IJ 1\FInaI EIR\Table I-A_Flnal4 doc (17/19/01) I-23 ..., ta.. ... ..~ t~ ~! JIB! w! ~ f~ ~ S s ! ~ t! s i• L9A A99CCIAfY! INC FINAL YI4 OECEMBPa ]001 VICI USIA nARD0N9 However, the City may Impose measures (such as replanting) as a part of the permit process that must be implemented Sensitive Species Present or Habitat Present. Based on No mmgahon is required surveys, no federally or state Itsted threatened or endangered species are present on site Thus, there well be no Impacts to federally or state Its[ed threatened or endangered species, end no mitigation Is requved Plant Communities. Impacts resulting from the project well include approximately 54 acres to disturbed Rlversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS), approximately 20 acres to non-native grasslands, and approximately 100 acres of abandoned vineyards The disturbed RAFSS on site Is not a contiguous block of habitat The 54 acres of disturbed RAFSS are distributed in two locations on site, ranging from 7 to 47 acres The patch oCRAFSS to the northern portion of the project site is ad)acent to Victoria Arbors Village, an approved development site that will no longer sustain a RAFSS ~l community The lack of any threatened or rndangered (uJ species further indicates the low habitat value of the site Impacts to RAFSS are not significant because of the degradation and isolation of the site No mrttgation is requved Wetlands. No wetlands are detertnmed to be on site, per No mitigation is regwred focused surveys wnh no detection of hydrophyttc vegetation Therefore, there are no impacts to wetlands and no mitigation requved Raptor Habitat. The golden eagle, red-shouldered hawk No mitigation is required and burrowing owl were observed on site While these species were observed foraging on site, due to lack of suitable nesting habitat (the red-shouldered hawk nests in dense riparian areas and the golden eagle nests typically on cliffs, although may also nest to large bees in open areas), it is not likely that the golden eagle or the red-shouldered hawk nut on site The eucalyptus trees arc potentially nesting habitat, however, no nests (nor nesting behavior) were observed on site The foraging area of these raptors is extensive, the golden eagle in southern California has a temtonal and foraging area of approxtmately 36 square R \CRG 131\Flnal EIR\7able I•A_FIna14 doE (I2119/al) 1-24 L9A A8 ATl9 INf OLCPMBLR YOQI PINAI PIR VIf rOPIA UARUl N9 miles The limited knowledge available on the red- shouldered hawk home ranges points to a temtonal and foraging area between 156 and 480 acres (in Michigan) Due to the extensive home range of these raptors, the loss of foraging habitat for raptors is not considered to be a significant impact Cumulative Impacts. The study area between the proposed SR-30 and SR-60 Day Creek watershed (Figure 4 4 3) has approximately 2,300 acres of undeveloped land with similar habitat to the proposed pro3ect (active and abandoned vineyards) The 174 acres of the Victoria Gardens proposed protttt will conhibute to the loss of approximately 8 percent of the undeveloped land in the area Other approved and proposed pro3ects (including the W Victoria Gardens prgttt) within the study area will conmbute to [he loss of 612 of the 2,300 saes, or ~ approximately 27 percent Given the cunent rate of development within the study area, the accessibility to bo- or to-modal transit (railway, interstate, and airport), and the fact that the area is slated for development, it is reasonable to predict that all 2,300 acres will be developed in the future The 2,300-acre area has bttn historically used for agricultural purpose and is degraded habitat Due to the degradation of the area and [he fragmentation of habitats by interstate frttways, state routes, and residential and industrial development, the loss of habitat (8 percent of the total undeveloped habitat) from the site is not considered significant No mmgation is requved R.\CRG131~Final EtR\Table l-A Flnal4 doc (11JI9NI) 1-2$ •~ ~n : r ~r ~ r aR w~ r r s~ r r r r ,ws ~t 19A ASSOCIATl9 INC DlC lM Sl0. 30111 FINA1 PIR ViC P00.1A OAR IIIN! 4 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Less Than Signlncant Impacts The proposed prgect well have a less than significant No mrtigahon is required Impact on the Foothill Fieldstone Stockpiles since rt does not meet the cntena for listing on the Cahfomia Register of Htstone Resources 4.6 PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES SCHOOLS Potentially Signllieant Impacts Impart 4.6.1. As a result of the overcrowding to the classrooms of the Ehwanda and Chaffey School Distracts, both have urged and continue to urge the Clty not to approve development unless adequate school facilities are available to serve the development protect Future development will generate more students for the already Impacted school dismcts and Is considered stgmficant (J School mntgahon plans would be enacted between the E[Iwanda School DlstricUChaffey Joint Hlgh School Distract and the protect developer by providing a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residential and rate per square-foot of commercial development of [he prgect sue Implementation of thw mthganon would reduce Impacts on schools to ales-than-stgmficant level Cumulative Impacts. As identified to the previously discussion, new development associated with Victana Gardens would Increase the demand on uhools and the school distnMS' education semces m the protect vicinity The proposed protect would require additional stafFing and facilities to accommodate the proposed 600 multi-Camily residrnhal amts However, implementation of Identified mitigation measures would lessen the protest's cumulative contnbutions to educational service impacts In addition, all other protects within the CIty will be regwred to adhere to the uniform State envvonmrntal standards and evaluations set forth by the CallComta Environmental No mhganon is regwred Less than stgmficant R.\CRGIJI\Ftnal EIR\Teble I-A_Flnal4 doe (IL19/01) 1-26 i • • 4.6.1 A. s ••~ ~ . ar ra rs r r ~r r~ r w~ ~r r 1r ~ r 19.1 989 TE! INC YINA1 CIR D PCCMEPR 1001 VI( fOR1.1 OA0. DCN! 19 C MCl PI P 9U aY Quality Act (CEQA) Therefore, the proposed pro)ect Impacts Is considered to be less than significant wnh Implementation of mmgahon measures POLICE Potentially Significant Impacts Impact 4.6 2. Development oCthe proposed commercial, residential, or office uses may Increase the demand for police semces Additional police personal, facilities and/or egwpment will be regmred to service any increased demand for police services associated with development oC the Victoria Gardens pro)ect This Impact is potentially significant W Cumulative Impacts. The Vlctona Gardens project would increase the demand of pollee protection in the area However, the proposed profect's Impacts on police services were determined to be less than significant contingent upon the Implementation of all mmgahon measures As other development pro)ects are constructed citywide and In the vimmty of the proposed protect, the Clty will be responsible for ensuring that adequate police semce is provided Therefore, cumulative impacts associated with development of the proposed protect are considered to be less than significant 4.6 2A. Less than significant No mmgatlon Is regmred R \CRGI31\Flnal EIR\Tebte 1•A_F1na14 doe (17/19/01) 1-2~ 4.6.2B. To address the increased demand on ~ police services resulting from the proposed project, an area within the retail center will be set aside for an on-site 1~ police ~ .~ .~ ... ... '..~ ~ s 19A A99O CIATP9 INC DI CLMLIR ]Oel PIMA1 PI0. VICI ORIA OA0.DLN9 I P PEPCUIIVP 9VMMA0.Y FIRE Less Than Signillcant Impact The Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Dtstnct has a standard No mttigahon is requved response ume threshold o(five minutes, including call-tn- nme Based on lhts standard, the maximum travel ume would be three minutes Due to the pro)ect's location relative to Stations 3, 4, and 5, the site is anttmpated to fall wrthm the 5 minute response ume cntena. Potentlslly SIgnlBcant Impacts Impact 4.6.3. Construction of the proposed protect will increase the demand on current Fue Dtstnct forces and evadable resources Therefore, addtuonal fire protection servtces will be regwred Impacts, resulting from Vtetona Gardrns, on the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Fue Dtsutct's T fire servtces are therefore, potentially significant L Cumulative lmpacts. New development associated with the Victoria Community Plan built aut would increase the demand for fire protection m the area and would regwre addrttonal stating and facilities to accommodate growth However, tmplementatton of identified mmgatwn measures would lessen the project's cumulative contnbuhons to potential impacts relating to public fire protection servtces Therefore, the proposed pro)ect's conmbuttons to potential tmpads on fire protection servtces is considered to be less than significant with implementation of miugatton measures R \CRG 131\Final EIR\Table I•A Flnal4 d« (ILI9I01) ~ ~ ~ w ar ar ~ ~ ^~ ~ ~s ^~ 4.63A. The developer shall )om Community Facdrttes Less than stgntticant Dtstnct (CFD) 85-1 to provide fire protection semces to the sae 4 6.3B. The developer shall install full, automatic fire spnnklers systems m all commerctaVretad,office, avtc and multi-family residential amts m accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fue Dtstnct Ordinance No IS and Rancho Cucamonga Ftrc District Ordinance No 22 4.6.3C. The Ftrc Dtshtct shall be consulted on street name assignments to assure wmpltance wah response plans No mrttgatton is requved 1-28 °~ ~ ~ a.. ~ tas~ s to ~! ~ a ~ ~ i' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L!A AS IP] INC DCClN RL0. ]°°1 YIHAL LIR VICI ORIA CARaLNJ WATER Less Than Significant Impacts It is anticipated that the future development will increase water production demands by approximately 68 8 mgd These future demands will be met with an aggressive capital improvement program, which includes construction of transmission mains, well sites, increasing the reservov storage capacities In all pressure zones, and increasing the size of the L W Michael Treatment Plant Most of all of these facilities are slated for completion within the next 10- I Syears The District is developing a reclaimed water program, which will utilized processed water from the Regional Plant No 4 located at the southwest comer of Ehwanda Avenue and Sixth Street The reclaimed water will provide semce to major landscaping and recreational areas and many parkway and medlar island improvements Cumulative Imparts In conjunction with cumulative W projects, the proposed development will increase water service demand to [he City of Rancho Cucamonga by approximately 732 20-acre feet per year (654,000 gallons per day) The increased water demand associated with this proposed project is an increase of less than 2%of the current average total of water supplied by the Dismct CCWD supplms the majonty water using both imported surface water end local groundwater and these water sources are expected to be available to meet service area wattt demand in the future Any projects within the City wdl be subjected to all applicable envvonmental standards and evaluation set forth by the Cahfomia Envvonmentel Quality Act addressing project specific water service Impacts In additmn, CCWD has anticipated mtteases m water demand and associated infrastmcturc m its water faahhes and supply planning efforts Therefore, the proposed prgect's contributions to potential cumulative wattt semce impacts are considered to be less than significant No mingation is required R \CRG I )1\Flnal EIR\Table I-A_Fina14 doe (11/19/01) ] _29 ~ >~ as L9A A930CIAIP9 INf DICLNaLR pill!! ~ ~ ^t WASTEWATER Less than Signllieant Impacts The proposed project will mereaze wastewater effluent flows to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency's treatment system However, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency indicates that there is sufficient wastewater capacity to treat the wastewater generation estimated for Victoria Gardens While, the ultimate capacity of RP-0 totals 7 0 mgd, on an average day, this facility treats approximately 4 4 mgd Average daily surplus capacity at RP-0 totals 2 6 mgd Development of the Victoria Gardens project will result in the generation of approximately 277,200 gallons of wastewater per day The volume of wastewater generated by the proposed prgect will amount to approximately 6°/R of the wastewater currently treated by RP-0 every day, less than 4°/] of RP-4's ultimate daily capacity, and less than I I % of the plants average daily surplus capacity If bypassed to RP-I, wastewater flows would amount to less than 1 % of this facdny's current treatment load and ultimate daily capacity, and approximately 6 0°/a of the average daily surplus capacity at RP-Consequently, potential impacts azsocieted with increases of wastewater flows to Iocai treatment which will occur with development of the Victoria Gardens project are considered less than significant Cumulative Impacts. The increase m wastewater generation azsociated with the constmchon of Victoria Gardens will elevate the demand for wastewater services from the Inland Empire Utilities Agency Existing wastewater treatment faahties can accommodate the projected wastewater generated by the proposed prgect m combination with all other prgec[s wrthm the City Existing and planned wastewater facilities are expected to be available to meet citywide wastewater generation m the future Both RPI and RP-0 have adequate daily surplus capacity to accept wastewater Flows generated from the proposed on-site uses, therefore, potential cumulative waztewater service impacts are considered to be less then significant ~ ~ ^~i ~r a^. ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ PINA1 LI0. VIC rORIA OARDPN] 1 ° PLPCUl1VL ]UM VARY No mmgauon is requred No mmgahon is required R.\CRGIII\Flnal EIR\Table I-A_Flnal4 doc (11/19!01) s 1-30 • s a EIR FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL 15716 MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN (MMP) Exhibit "C" F3`~- ' L9A A990CIATl9 INC FINAL EI¢ DEC EY BE¢ f9Rl VICTORIA CARDlN9 P¢OJlCT APYEN DIX H YITICATION YONITORINC PLAN ' APPENDIX H MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN Thts mitigation momtonng plan has been prepared for use in implementing mitigation meas»res identified in the Environmental Impact Report for the Victona Gazdens protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with the State law to ensure compliance with mitigation measures adopted for the protect by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Assembly Bi113180 (Public Resources Code, Pazagraph 201081.6), effective January 1, 1989, requires adoption of a reporting or monrtortng ' program for those conditions of approval placed on a protect to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment. The law states that the momtonng or repotting program shall be designed to ensure compliance during protect implementation. ' The monitoring program contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mthgahon measures are recorded with the action ' and procedure necessary to ensure compliance. In some instances, one action, such as plan review, may be used to venfy implementation of several conditions of approval 2 A procedure of compliance and venficahon has been outlined for each action necessary. Tlus procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. ha e com- t fl ng s o exible. As momtonng progresses, c 3. The program has been designed to be pliance procedures may be necessary based on recommendations by those responsible for the ' program If changes aze made, new manitonng compliance procedures and records will be developed and Incorporated Into the program F 3a R \CRGI31ffm91 EIRU1mg9non Momronng PIRn Fnul dac (IY21IOq H-1 L5G A990CIA INC OP CPYRP0. 9001 PI N.11 PI4 VICT 011.9 0.9p pLNn PR OJPCT APPLNOIL II YITIChTION YONITOpINC .9N0 nrron llNa P4000.AY Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report -Victoria Gardens , Traft-ic 4.I.lA The project shall make a fair share contribution to following improvements (Year 2007) • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps Applicant shall pay traffic fees Applicant shall pay CIty Engineer - Addmon of a free southbound nght loin lane to the Qt y the far share contribution for traffic mitigation m a sum of S 149,631 to the City Engineer poor to Issuance of 'j'~ bwldmg pertnrt • Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane - Applicant shall participate in the Formation of CFD to Clty Engineer conversion of proposed westbound shared Community Facilities Dlshict be completed poor through/nght loin lane to a dedicated IeR loin lane (CFD) that will conshuct this to issuance of and conversion of proposed dedicated westbound improvement cemficate of nght loin lane to a shared [hrough/nghl loin lane, occupancy resulting in three two westbound IeR loin lanes and a single shared through/right loin lane Addition of a free northbound right loin lane This signal wdl need to be operated "split phase" eastbound and westbound [o allow three two westbound lanes to loin IeR • Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - Applicant shall participate in the Formation of CFD to City Enginter Addrtwn of a free westbound nght loin lane, Community Facilities Distnct be completed poor which will continue to become the free (CFD) that will conshuct this to issuance of northbound nght nim lane at Day Creek improvement certificate of Boulevard/Vwtona Gardrns Lane Conversion of occupancy one northbound left loin lane to a northbound through lane Addition of a Ree northbound nght R \CRG131iFlnel ElRihtmganon Monlonng PIRn Float doc (I7119/aq II-22 tl~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 19A ASSOCIAI [S IN( FINA1 YIP D[C [NSC0. ]001 VICTORIA OAR DONS FROJPII APP LNDII I1 MITIGAr10N YONITORINO AND 0.PPORIINC P0.0C0.AM ' ~~~]~ iCk Ox 1 'S' r~r~ turn lane, which will continue to become a dedicated right tum lane at I-I S Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard Addition of a third southbound IeR lum lane Conversion of southbound shared thougWright tum lane to a dedicated southbound right tum lane Modficahon of signal phasing to provide right tum overlap phasing for southbound right tum movement As an alternative to the overlap phasing, a free (unconholled) right ruin for this movement would improve overall intersection operations slightly and permu eastbound U-turns, although a LOS calculation well show greater average delay for controlled movements This signal wdl need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three .~ southbound lanes to ruin IeR Coordination of ~ signal timing with Day Creek Boulevard/Vwtona Gardens Lane shall be implemented to provide ~ maximum use of southbound green time Signal timing must consider pedestrian crossing of the east leg of the intersection m order to connect a pedestrian trail from north to south Short northbound through green phase will require pedeshians crossing Foothill Boulevard on the east leg of this mtersechon to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedestrian signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the east leg of the intersection • Vintona Gardens Lane/Base Line Road - Applicant shall participate m the Formation of CFD to Crty Engineer Conversion of planned northbound shared Community Facilities District be completed poor through/nght ruin lane to a free right ruin lane (CFD) that will construct this to issuance of Addition of a dedication eastbound right ruin lane improvement certificate of occupancy R ~CRGUI~F~IEIRU7rtigation MDnlonng Plen Final doc (IL[9N1) ~ ~ 3 . . . ~ ~ 1 ]A A]]OCIA~INC OPCCMICI 1001 PINA1 CIR VICI ORIA OA0.0l N] PIOf CCT APCIN OIS II YITIOATION MONITORING ANO l[PO RTINO PI OCIAY • Vtctona Gardens Lane/Church Street- Applicant shall participate m the FORIIatIOn of CFD to Crty Engineer Modification of signal phasing to provide nght Community Faalrties Distract (CFD) that wdl construct this be completed prmr tum overlap phasing for northbound right tum to tssuance of movement improvement certtfirate of occupancy • Ehwanda Avenue/Arrow Route - Addition of a pPPhcant shall pay Applicant shall make Crty Engmeer second northbound through lane transportation fees to the City a fair share contnbution to traffic mmgahon m the sum of 541,387 to the City Engmeer prior to tssuance of bmldmg permit • Ehwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue - Addition of a pPPlicant shall pay traffic fees Applicant shall pay City Engineer second southbound left tum lane and a free to the Crty the fair share westbound nght tum lane contnbutton Cor traffic mitigation m a sum of S 10,705 to the City Engmeer poor to tssuance of budding permit • 1-i S Southbound and Northbound Ramps/Base The City's intent is to fulfill this 77te City has Qty Engmeer Line Road -Freeway interchange must be mitigation for all development determined this to be reconstructed to include southbound and a public pro)ect northbound loop on-ramps Plans for the reconstruction of this interchange are currently being prepared by Caltrans, SANBAG, and the Qty of Rancho Cucamonga The reconstruction of this interchange will include the reconstruction of the intersection of East Avenue and Base Line Road R tCRGl7ItFinal RIRUlmganon Moidonng Plan Flnal da (IL19/01) H-24 LIA AlIOCIAI E] INC YINAI PI0. DCC[Y]CR foal VICTORIA OAi D[N! P0.0J000 _ AP RNDIE 11 YITIOAl10N YONITOtINO AMO 0.PP00.11HC PROC0.AY T 1_ • Cherry Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a Applicant shall pay traffic (ees The Applicant shall City Engineer second southbound left ruin lane This mitigation to the Crty pay the fair share will maintain the level oC service at this contnbunon for intersection at its 2001 level, which did not meet haffic mitigation m a the City of Fontana's LOS C standard sum of 552,500 to the City Engineer pnor to issuance of bwldmg pennrt 4 IJA The pro)ect shall make a fair share conMbution to the following improvements (Year 2020) Applicant shall make City Engineer • Archibald Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition Applicant shall pay a fair share of a dedicated eastbound right ruin lane, a hansportation Cees to the City conMbution in a sum dedicated northbound right ruin lane, and a of 529,167 to the ~ second southbound left ruin lane Crty Engineer pnor to issuance of budding permit • Haven Avenue/Base Line Road -Addition of a third eastbound through lane and a second Applicant shall pay Applicant shall make City Engineer eastbound left ruin lane transportation fees to the Crty a fav share contribution to traffic mitigation m the sum of 531,201 to the Crty Engineer pnor to issuance of budding permit • Milliken Avenue/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps - Addition of a free northbound tight ruin lane Applicant shall pay traffic fees Applicant shall make City Engineer to the City a fair share contnbuuon to traffic mitigation m the sum of 52,568 to the City Engineer pnor to issuance of budding permit R 1CRGI31tFiyg(EIRVNItiganon Monlonng Plan Final doc (17/19Poq ~ i5 f1A CIA~NC fIPCPYLLR 3001 U PINAI PIR VICI ORIA OARCCN3 PROD LCP _ APPPNOIA II YITIGATIOM YOMIIORINC ANN RPP04TIN0 PR OOR AM • Mdhken AvenueBase Lme Road -Addrtton of a The Applicant shall pay traffic The Applicant shall Crty Engineer [htrd eastbound through lane and a thud fees pay the fatr share southbound through lane contrtbutton for traffic mmgatton m a sum oCS27,950 to the Ctty Engineer pnor to tssuance of budding pennrt • Mdltken AvenuelFoothtll Boulevard - Addrtton of Appltcant shall pay The Appltcant shall Crty Engineer a thud eastbound through lane, a ihtrd and a transportation fees to the Ctty pay the fair share fourth southbound through lanes, and a dedicated conhtbutton for northbound tight tum lane traffic mmgation m a sum of 543,462 to the City Engineer pnor to issuance of budding permit • Mdhken Avenue/Anow Route - Addition of a Apphranl shall pay The Applicant shall Ctty Engineer second eastbound left tum lane, a thud eastbound transportation fees to the Crty pay the fan share through lane, and a fourth northbound through contrtbutton for lane traffic mingatwn m a sum of S 13,097 to the City Engineer pnor to tssuance of building permit • Mdbken Avenue/4lh Street -Addtnon of a thud Appltcant shall pay The Applicant shall Ctty Engineer southbound left tum lane Modification of signal transportation fees to the Ctty pay the fart share phasing to provide tight tum overlap phasing for conmbutton for northbound tight tum movement traffic mmgahon m e sum of 56,539 to the City Engineer pnor to tssuance of R tCRGU ItFtml EIRVdmgatton Mottlonng Plan Final doc (12/19N I ) H-26 .~ rz~ ~ r~ Illllllf~ Ilia s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LCA A9]OCI Al P9 INC OCCEM BPR ]E01 YINA1 PIR VIC fO0.1A OA0.0EMC PROfLCI APCCNOIR II MITIGATION MONI PO0.1N0 ANU RPYOR CINO P40CRA4 T b ld w mg permit • Rochester Avenue/Arrow Route -Conversion of second northbound left tum lane to a se d Applicant shall pay The Applicant shall City Engineer con northbound through lane transportation fees to the City pay the fair share contribution for traffic mitigation m a sum of 520,01 I to the City Engmeerpnor to issuance of building permit • I-I S Southbound Ramps/4'a Sheet -Addition of a free southbound right tum lane Modification of signal phazmg to provide nght turn ove l Applicant shall pay traffic fees t h C Applicant shall make City Engineer r ap phazing for northbound nght tum movement o t e ity a fair share m the amount of 57,061 poor to issuance of budding permit • Day Creek Boulevard/Summit Avenue -Addition Applicant shall pay The Applicant shall City Engineer of dedicated northbound and southbound nght transportation fees to the City pay the fair share tum lanes contribution for traffic mitigatwn m a sum of 55,303 to the City Engineer poor to issuance of budding permit • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps Applicant shall pay traffic Cees [Note Applicant is City Engineer - Construction of a loop ofC--ramp for westbound to the City making fair share SR-210 traffic exiting south onto Day Creek paymrnt for this Boulevard mitigatwn m its payment of S 149,631 for mitigation measure 4 I 1 A The intent is not to duplicate [he payment again for R \CRG131\Flnal EfRVvfingauon Maidonng Plan Final doc (IL19N1) H-27 19n A990CI ~IN( OYUPYIIflR ]001 YIN PIR VIUI URIn UnR OI Na PR OJPOI _ APPYN010. II YI IICAl10N MONITORING AND RYPORIINO P0.0D0.AY ~~ A 2020 Impacts ] • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps Appltcant shall pay traffic fees Appltcant shall make City Engineer - Addtnon of a free northbound tight tum lane to the Qty a fav share m the Converston of eastbound shared IeR amount of tum/through/tight tum lane to a shared S 11,415 pnor to through/nght tum lane issuance of butldmg penntt • Day Creek Boulevard/Hlghland Avenue - Appltcant shall pay The Appltcant shall Crty Engineer Addilton of dedicated northbound and southbound transportation fees to the Ctty pay the fair share rght tum lanes Converston of westbound shared contnbution for through/tight tum lane to a dedicated tight tum traffic mrtigahon m a lane Modtfcation of signal phasing to provide sum of E14,406 to the tight tum overlap phasing for westbound tight Ctty Engineer pnor tum movement to tssuance oC budding permit • Day Creek Boulevard/Base Ltne Road -Addtnon Apphcant shall parttapate m the Formation of CFD to Qty Engineer of a second eastbound IeR tum lane and a second Community Facthnes Dtsntet be completed pnor westbound IeR tum lane (CFD) that wdl consWCt this to tssuance of tmprovement certificate of occupancy • Day Creek BoulevardNtctona Gardens Lane - Apphcant shall participate m the Formation of CFD to Ctty Engineer Addrtwn of a free northbound tight turn lane Community Facdrties Dtstnct be completed prwr Short eattbound green phaze will necessitate (CFD) that will construct this to tssuance of prohibition of pedestrian crossing of Day Creek tmprovement certificate of Boulevard on the south leg of this Intersection occupancy R ~CRGU I~ItiI EIRUimganan Monfonng Plan Flnal doc (13119Np H-28 .~. s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ L9A A990CIAIP9 INl YINAI Y1R DLC[N pPR 10.e1 vICIOFIA CARD LNI PROJYI I _. APPPNO1111 YII ICAIION YONIIO0.1N0 ANO 1YP00.11NC P40C0.AY T ~c '1J • Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - Addmon of a free westbound tight turn lane, Applicant shall partinpate m the Formation of CFD to Crty Engineer which will continue to become the free Community Facilities Distnet be completed pnor northbound tight tom lane at Day Creek (CFD) that will construct this to issuance of BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane Conversion of Improvement certificate of one northbound IeR loin lane to a northbound occupancy through lane Addition of a free northbound tight loin lane, which will continue to become a dedicated right loin lane at 1-I S Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard Addmon of a third southbound IeR loin lane Conversion of southbound shared though/nght loin lane to e dedcated southbound tight loin lane Modification of signal phasing to provide tight loin overlap phasing for southbound tight loin movement As en alternative to the overlap phasing, a free (uncontrolled) right turn for this movement would improve overall intersection ~ operations slightly and permit eastbound U-toms, although a LOS calculation will show greater average delay for controlled movements This signal will need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to turn IeR Short westbound through green phase will require pedestrians crossing Day Creek Boulevard on the north leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and Then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedestrian signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the north leg of the mtersechon Southbound IeR tom lanes must be side-by-side with the northbound IeR tom lane at Vwtona Gardens Lane to provide sufficient queuing capacity Cor southbound IeR tom movements (See Figure 4 1 IS in the E[R) Coordination of signal timing with Day Creek BoulevardNtctona Gardens Lane shall be implemented to provide maximum use of southbound green time Signal timing must consider pedestnan crossing of the east leg of the R Monfonng Plan Final doc (11/19N1) iiiiiii: >.ittt~ ttllllit~ ~It ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s a ~ ~ I ]A A]]OCI INC OPCCM RLRf YINA1 Plq VICI ORIA OA0.DLN] PROJ[Cl APPENDIa II MITIGATION MONITORING AND 0.EPO0.TIN6 P0.000.AN T mtersecuon m order to connect a pedestrian trad from north to south Short northbound through green phaze will require pedestrians crossing Foothill Boulevard on the east leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedestrian signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the eazt leg of the intersection • 1-IS Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard - Applicant shall pay traffic fees Applicant shall make Addmon of a free eastbound right turn Zane to the City a fair share m the City Engineer amount of 586,807 poor to issuance of binldmg permm • Victoria Gardens LandBaze Line Road - Applicant shall participate m the Formation of CFD to Crty Engineer Conversion of planned northbound shared Community Facilities Distnet be completed poor through/right tum lane to a free right tum lane (CFD) that will construct this to issuance oC improvement certificate of occupancy • Victoria Gardens Lane/Church Street - Addihom Applicant shall participate m the Formation of CFD to City Engineer of a second westbound IeR tum lane Community Facilities District be completed prwr Modificauon of signal phasing to provide right (CFD) that wdl constmc[ This to issuance of tum overlap phasing for northbound right tum improvement certificate of movement occupancy • Etiwanda Avenue/Church Sheet - Addrtwn of a dedicated northbound left tum lane, resulting m a A titan[ shall artici ate m the c Formation of CFD to Gt En weer y 8 single IeR tum lane and a single shared Community Fa hties Disnict be completed poor through/nght tum lane Addition of a dedicated (CFD) that wdl constmc[ this to issuance of eastbound IeR tum lane, resulting m a single IeR improvement certificate of tum lane and a single shared through/nght tum occupancy lane Addition of a dedicated westbound IeR tum lane, resulting in a single left tum lane and a single shared through/nght tum lane R tCRG131~Fitul EIRU7inganon Motdonng Plan Final dot (17/19/01) H-30 uA Aaaomnlea IN4 DeceN eeR a°°1 rlNnl PIR VICTORIA OA0.OLN9 PROJPGI APPLM OI%II MITICAfION MONI rO RINO AND 0.PPO Rl INC PR OO0.nN • Ehwanda Avenue/Foothdl Boulevard -Addmon of a second southbound through lane, a second northbound through lane, and a second Applicant shall pay traffic (ees to the City Applicant shall make a Cair share in the City Engineer northbound IeR loin lane Modification of signal phasing to provide nght loin overlap phasing for the northbound right loin movement amount o[ 567,720 poor to issuance of building permit • Ehwanda Avenue/Anow Route -Addmon of a second northbound through lane, a second southbound through lane, a second eattbound through lane, a second eastbound IeR loin lane, a second westbound IeR loin lane, and a dedicated northbound nght loin lane Applicant shall pay transportation fees to the City [Note Applicant is making fair share payment for this mitigation m its payment of 544,387 for mitigation City Engineer meazure 4 I 1 A The intent is not to -~1 L duplicate the payment again for 2020 impacts ] • Ehwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue, only 25% in the City -Addition of a second eattbound IeR loin lane Applicant shall pay traffic fees to the City Applicant shall make a fav share m the City Engineer amount of 510,744 poor to issuance of bwldmg pennrt • Ehwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue -Addition of a third and a fourth northbound through lane, a second eastbound IeR loin lane, a second APPllcant shall pay traffic fees to the Crty [Note Applicant is making fav share City Engineer southbound IeR loin lane, a second westbound IeR payment for this mm lane, and a free westbound nght loin lane mmgatwn m its payment of S 10,705 for mitigation meazure4l IA The intent is not to duplicate the payment again for 2020 impacts ] R tCRG U I tFinal EIRUlmganan Manlonng Plan Flnal d« (I LI9/0 q H-31 ~n r ~~ a ~s tt! 19A AlIOCI ~INC CCC LYEC0. !0 = I• ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ nrr LNnlx 11 YITICAl 10 ~s s a~^ ~ a~ MINA PIR VICIO0.IA CANI)CN! PROfCCf 'JNIIORINO ANU 0.YPORTINO P0.00RAM • 1-IS Southbound and Northbound Ramps/Base The City has Line Road -Freeway interchange must be The Qty's intent rs to fulfill this determined this to be Crty Engineer reconstructed to include southbound and mitigation for all development a public protect northbound loop on-ramps Plans for [he reconstruction of this interchange are currently being prepared by Caltrans, SANBAG, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga The reconstruction of this interchange wdl include the reconstructron of the intersection of East Avenue and Base Line Road • East Avenue/Base Gne Road - Mmganon et this See above See above intersection is included as part of 1-15/Base Line Road interchange reconstruction • Cherry Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a [Note Applicant is second eastbound IeR rum lane, a dedicated APPlicant shall pay traffic fees making Farr share Crty Engineer eastbound right turn lane, a second southbound to the Crty payment for this IeR rum lane, a dedicated northbound tight turn mmgation m its lane, and a dedicated westbound right turn lane payment of S52,500 for mitigation measure 4 I I A The intent is not to duplicate the payment again for 2020 impacts ] NOISE 4.2.1A Constmchon shall be limited to the hours of Applicant shall submit to the Pnor to the issuance of Crty Budding 6 30 a m through 8 00 p m on Monday through City proof that the mitigation grading permits Department Saturday, excluding national holidays No measure listed is included in the construction shall be allowed on Sundays construction documents with the developer's conhactor 4.2.16 There shall be proper mufPmg of and Applicant shall submit to the Pnor [o the issuance of City Budding maintenance of all mtemal combustion engines for Qty proof that the mitigation grading permits Department construction egwpment and vehicles used on the site measure fisted is included m the construction documents with the developer's contractor R ~CRGIJItFinal EIRUfmganon Mordonng Plan Flnal doc (12/19N1) H-32 IpA Af]OCI ATP] INC OLC LMpPR ]001 YIMA1 P14 VICTORIA CAR DLNR PROJLCI APPLMDI]II YI YIOAl10N MONIfORINO AMD RPPO0.11N0 PR OORAM 4.2.iC All stationary noise generating sources, such as Applicant shall submit to the Prior to the Issuance of Clty Bwlding air compressors and portable power generators, shall City proof that the mitigation grading penults Department be located as far away as possible from existin6 measure fisted Is included m the sensitive receptors construction documents wnh the developer's contractor 4.2.2A Residential amts located wrthm 86 feet of the centerline o(Day Creek Boulevard shall be e ui ed Applicant shall submn to the t C f h h Pnor to the Issuance of Qty Building q pp with building facade upgrades, such as double paned l y proo t at t e mlllgation measure listed is Included In the building permits Department (or dual glazing) windows, and mechanical ventilation, building plans such as en air condrtiomng system 4.2.28 Resdential amts located within 172 feet of the Applicant shall submit to the Pnor to the Issuance of City Bwlding centerline of Day Creek Boulevard shall be egmpped City proof that the mmgation budding permits Department with building facade upgrades, such as double paned measure listed is included in the (or dual glazing) windows, and mechanical ventilation, budding plans such as an an condihomng system C.2.2C Residential amts located within 364 feet of the Applicant shall submit to the Pnor to the issuance of City Budding crnterhne of Day Creek Boulevard or wrthm 99 feet of Qty proof that the mmgahon bwldmg pennrts Department the centerline of Church Street shall be egwpped wnh measure fisted is included m the mechanical venhlahon, such as an av conditioning bwldmg plans system 4.2.2D Sensnroe receptors located along Vmtona The developer of the Victoria Pnor to the issuance of Crty Bmldmg Gardens Lene within the proposed Victoria Arbors Arbors Village tract shall submit building permits Department Village may require a six foot sound wall If outdoor to the City proof that the land uses Cell wrthm 77 feet of the roadway A form of mingation measure fisted is mechanical ventilation, such as an condnwnmg, well included m the bwldmg plans be required if the residences arc within 165 feet of (Note The approved TTI597I Victoria Gardrns Lane Vretana Arbors VJlage Is conditioned to provide a su foot block wall) 4.2.2E Outdoor plazas and dining areas shall Applicant shall submn to the Prior to the issuance of City Budding incorporate features to mask or reduce noise grnerated City proo(that the mingatwn budding permits Departmrnt from prgect related traffic Specfically, the protect measure listed is Implemented m design shall utilize water features (e g fountains), the building plans Moidonng Plan Final doe (I LI9N1) H-33 ~ i n ~. ..~ : 1 ]A A]90CIA~INC IJPCPM RPR ]001 YIN tIR VICI ORIA GAROLNR P0.0JLCY APPCNUIa II NII (CATION NONITORINO ANN RPPORIINO PROORAN either alone, or G tandem with other nurse-reducing features (e g ,vegetative screening, structural design), to reduce noise levels within outdoor gathering and dining areas 4.2.3A On-sue residences located within 250 feet of Applicant shall submit to the Prior to the issuance of Ctty Planning any loading dock shall be egwpped with mechanical City proof that the mwganon building permits Department venulahon, such as an air condmonmg system measure fisted is implemented m the building plans 4 2 38 In accordance with City Code Section Applicant shall submit to the On-going throughout the City Code 17 10 050 of the Performance Standards, no loading or City proof that the mitigation life of the pro3ect Enforcement unloading activities, including track idling shall occur measure fisted is implemented m between the hours of 10 p m to 7 a m within 250 feet the building plans of any residential development. AIR QUALITY 4.3.IA. The Construction Conhactor shall select the Applicant shall submit to the City Prior to the issuance of Gty Planning constmction egwpment used on sue based on low proof that the mitigation measure grading permus Department emission factors and high energy efficiency The listed is included in the Construchon Contractor shall ensure that construction constructon documents with the grading plans include a statement that all construction developer's contractor equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance wuh the manufacturer's specifications 4 3.1 B The Constructon Contractor shall utilize Applicant shall submit to the Crty Prior to the issuance of Qty Budding and electric or diesel powered egwpment m lieu of gasoline proof that [he mitigation measure grading permits Safety Department powered engines where feasible listed is included in the constmction documents with the developer's conMactor 4.3.1 C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that Applicant shall submit to the Qty Prior to [he issuance of Qty Budding construction grading plans include a statement that proof that the mitigation measure grading permits Departrnent work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use fisted is included m [he During smog season (May through October), the constmction documents with the overall length of the constmction period should be developer's contractor extrnded, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimiu vehicles and R ICRG131iFina1 EIRUlmgauon Monlonng Plan Flml dot (12/19/01) H-34 ~ ~ _~ Ilt ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ S ~ r 1]A A]]OCIAl P1 INC PINAI PIR UPCtMRPR 5001 VIOI ORIA GAROPN] PROfrI 1 APPPNUI]( II MIIICAtION NONI PORING ANU RYLORIINO Pl OQ0.AM N N egwpment operating at the same lime 4J 1 D The Construction Contractor shall time the Applicant shall submit to the City Pnor to the Issuance of Crty Engineering construction activities so as not to mter(ere with peak proof that the mitigation measure grading permits Department hour traffic and mmimiu obstruction of through traffic listed is included m the lanes ed~acent to the site, if necessary, a Ragperson construction documrnts with the shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing developer's contractor roadways 4.3.1 E. The Construction Conhactor shall support and Applicant shall submit to the City Pnor to the Issuance of Clty Bwldmg encourage ndesharing and transit Incentives for the proof that the mitigation measure grading Ixrmits Department constructwn crew fisted is included m the construction documents with the developer's conhactor 4.3.1 F. Dust generated by the development activities Applicant shall submit to the City Pnor to the Issuance of Qty Bwidmg shall be retained on site and kept to a minimum by proof that the mmgatwn measure grading permits Department following the dust control measures listed below listed is included in the construction documents with the a Dunng clearing, grading, earth moving, developer's contractor excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a emst aRer each day's activities cease b Dunng construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas In the late morning end aRer work is completed Cor the day, and whenever wind exceeds I S miles per hour c ARrn clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, ilia rnhre area of disturbed sod shall be heated immediately until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation wdl not occur d Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be wvered, kept moist, or treated with soil borders to R ~CRGI31~FIn31 EIRVrtmgauan Monlonng Plan final doc (IL19NI) H-35 - _~ . .~ w ~ ~ try ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ 11A A]]OCI~INC ~ Y UPCEY E[4 f0 VICI ORIA OAFOENI APP CN pI.[ 11 MI YIOATION YONITORINC AND RPPOIIINC I r~ V W PIR ECT FAY r prevent dust generation e Trucks transporting sod, sand, cut or fill materials, and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be Carped Gom the point of origin 4.3.1 G. The Constiuchon Contractor shall utilize az much azpossible precoated/natural colored buildin Applicant shall submit to the City f th h Prior to the issuance of City Bwldmg g materials, water hazed or low VOC coating, and proo at t e mitigation meazure fisted is included m the bwidmg permits Department coating transfer or spray egwpment with high transfer construction documents with the efficiency, such as a high volume low pressure (HVLP) developer's contractor spray method, or manual coatings application such az paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, mg, or sponge 4.3.2A. The protect shall comply with Title 24 of the Cahfomia Code of Regulations established b the The applicant shall prepare and b h Prior to the issuance of CI[y Building y Energy Commission regarding energy conservation su mit to t e Crty for review and approval development plans that bwidmg permus Department standards incorporate the listed Title 24 of the Cahfomia Code of Regulations 4.3.26 Use of hansportation demand meazures The applicant shall prepare and Prior to the issuance of City Planning (TDM), such az pretbrential parking for submit to the City for review and budding pennrts Department vanpooling/carpooling, subsidy for transit pass or approval development plans that vanpooling/carpooling, flextime work schedule, bike incorporate the listed TDM racks, lockers, showers, and on-site cafeteria, shall be measures City Building incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses Department 4 3.2C. Prewire houses (or electrical charging EV cars, The applicant shall prepare and Prior to the issuance of a City Planning d feazible Install condwts for fiber optics for submit to the Crty for review end certificate of occupancy Department residential and non-residential uses approval, development plans mdicamng the fiber ophcs mitigahon 4.3 2D. Install EV chargers or alternative fuel stations The developer shall prepare and Prior to the issuance of City Building (natural gas) for community wide use at key submit to the City for review and building permits for any Department commercial and public locatmn(s) approval building plans that commercial bwidmg incorporate the fisted mitigaton and/or public facility measures R \CRGD 1\Final EIRUlmgauon Manlonng Plan Pinal doc (12/19/01) H-36 L!A AlIp CIATP9 INC pLCIYLCR ]C!I CINAI PI0. VICTORIA OAIpP N! PI OJP CT ACPC N011I 11 YIr10 A110N YONITOIINO ANp pPPO [TIMO PR OCpA4 ~/ y 4 3.2E. The developer shall contract with a mitigation The developer shall submit to the Pnor to [he Issuance of City Building monitor to assure compliance with and Implementation of the mmganon momtonng program City evidence that the developer h grading permits Department as contracted with a mrtiganon monitor to implement the PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES mmganon momtonng program d 6.1 A. The developer shall pay statutory school fees to the Etiwanda School Distnct and Chaffey Joint Proof of payment of the applicable Pnor to the issuance of City Building Unified Hlgh School District sub)ect to the hmnanons fees shall be provided to the Qty budding permits for any Department of Govemmrnt Code Sections 66996(e) and (h) rcsidrntial development 4 6.2A. The developer shall submit to the Clty a Public The developer shall submit a Pnor to issuance of Engineenng Safety and Secunty Plan, which Identifies the developee's intent to provide safety services to the Public Safety and Secunty Plan to h certificate of occupancy Department t e City for review and approval pro3ect 4.6.26. To address the increased demand on police The developer shall submit to the Pnor to the issuance of Clty Building smites resulting from the proposed pro)ect, an area City for review and approval building penults Departmrnt within the retail center will be set aside for an on-site building plans which shows an police office area set aside for a police office within the retail center Police Department 4.63A. The developer shall3oin Community Faculties The developer shall provide Prior to issuance building Fire Dept District (CFD) 85-) to provide fire protection services wntten proof that he/she has permits Bmldmg & Safety to the site 3omed the Community Facihhes Department District (CFD) 85-I Cor fire protection 4.638. The developer shall install full, automatic fire The developer shell submit to the Pnor to the issuance of Flrc Departrnrnt spnnklers systems m all commcrciaVretau,office, civic City for review and approval budding penults and ninth-family residential amts m accordance with bwldmg plans that include Rancho Cucamonga Flrt Distnct Ordinance No IS automatic fire spnnkler systems and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct Ordinance No City Building 22 Department 4.63C. The Firc Distnct shall be consulted on street The developer shall provide Pnor to the Issuance of Firc Department R tCRG131~Fina1 EIRUlalgatlon Moldonng Plan Final doe (12/i9/01) H-37 ttttttttr• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l3n w33om tNr UCC[Y pl0. 3001 PIN PIR VIC100.1n CAROCNp P0.0JLrT AP PLN OIX II YITIOnTION MONI PORING AND RYPO0.11N0 P4000.A4 name assignments to assure compliance with wntten proof to the Crty That response plans he/she has consulted with the Crty's Ftre Distract Crty Building Department r~ lA V" R ~CRGID I~Final EIRUNIngenon Monlonng Plan Final doL Q1/19Poq H-38 • FINAL EIR FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01- 01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL 15716 (DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER) Exhibit "D" C~ ~~ Jan-17-02 05:24pm from-Foract City Dev LA 12134666306 T-257 P 002/003 F-648 ~ FORF.STCITY D E V E L O P M E N T Colm Macken Senior ~ce President / Chief Development Officer January 17, 2002 Mr. Brad Buller Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Crvic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Limitations of the Capadty of the Project to Underwrite or Guarantee Traffic Improvements Called for in the QR Dear Brad: The final environmental impact report for our project (FEIR) identifies the need for major improvements to I-15 and I-10 and other offsite traffic improvements respectively. At your request, Forest Gty has consulted with Its Economic Advisor, Allan Kotin and has prepared this letter to indicate the limitations on the ability of the project to pay the costs of these improvements or, in the case of the offsite traffic improvements, to guarantee their completion prior to the opening of the retail center. The following discussion addresses the costs and laming of traffic mitigation recommended in the EIR and lays out the reasons why Forest City and the Project cannot accept the full responsibility for providing these recommended taaffic improvements In the amounts and on the schedule recommended. Cost of Traffic Mitigation Requiring the developer to pay for traffic mitigation in excess of what is allocated to the project in the Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Draft Conditions of Approval, however, would render the project financially infeasible for development. A pro-forma economic projection of development costs and estimated ernnomic returns for the project has been submitted by the developer and independently reviewed by the City's economic consultant. The pro-forma shows that the developer's anticipated "cash on cost" return is slightly less that ~' L I- the 12D/o return or "hurdle rate" ordi~n-arily needed th induce a developer to move LXh1ll\ I \\ ~\\ Forest City Developm nt Calffomia, Inc., 949 South Hope Street, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90015, (213) 488-0010, Fax: (213) 488-9308 Jan-17-02 05:25pm From-Forest City Dev LA 12134AAA308 T-25T P 003/003 F-64A Mr. Brad Buller January 17, 2002 Page 2 of 2 forward with a project of this type and scope. Accordingy, any additional cost, contribution or exaction beyond the amounts budgeted in the proforma would make the project an undesirable investment, and it would not be developed. The additional mitigation suggested by the QR is not within the pro-forma budget Possibie Delay of Completion of Mitigation Measures Past the Opening Date of the Center Several of the mitigation measures for Traffic and Circulation impacts require the payment of a "fair share" contribution by the project or completion of an improvement by the city or CFD, rather than requiring the project to pay the entire cost of the Improvement or guaranty that it be installed and completed by the time the project opens. If the remainder of the funding from other sources is not timely obtained, or if the improvemenrts are delayed for other reasons, the project may operate with additional unmitigated traffic impacts. Requiring the developer to pay any portion of this cost beyond Its fair share for the mitigation being imposed, however, would render the project financialry infeasible for development The pro-forma projection reference above and shared with the City's consultant shows that the developers antidpated "cash on cost" return rs slightly less that the 12% return or °hurdle rate" ordinarily needed to induce a developer to move forward with a project of this type and scope. Accordingly, any additional cost beyond the amounts budgeted in the profomta would make the project an undesirable investment and it would not be developed. In addition, construction financing and leasing practices for a large development like the project will require the project developer to commit to a an opening date for the project, and will not allow the opening to be postponed because of delays in funding or completing offsite traffic improvements. Opening dates are critical to retailers. Because of this, lenders and tenants are consistently unwilling to accept delays in opening contingent on completion of improvements outside the direct control of themselves or the developer of the center. Consequently, the above stated mitigation measures are not feasible, and will not be imposed. I trust that this letter and reasoning provided will be satisfactory m the City. If there are further questions or discussions, please feel free to contact me. Since~relQy, ~ 'Q~ ~Q Colm Macken Sr. ~re President Fla • EXHIBIT "D" Owner will pay all fees in effect on the effective date of this Agreement, except A) For processing fees in Section III D of the Development Agreement, B) And, the City Transportation Development Fee will not be paid on the first 1 4 Million square feet of commercial development, excluding development on the eastern area which is bounded by Victoria Gardens Lane, Church Street, and I-15, and provided that all development for which bwlding permits are issued more than four (4) years after opening of the project shall pay the City Transportation Development Fee in the amount in effect on the effective date of this agreement. • n U Fs°r RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH#20010301026) AND APPROVE THE STATEMENT OF FACTS AND FINDINGS AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15716, FOR A PROPOSED PROJECT KNOWN AS VICTORIA GARDENS, A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 2 45 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, OFFICE, AND CIVIC USES, AND UP TO 600 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON APPROXIMATELY 175 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY FUTURE CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, I-15 FREEWAY TO THE EAST, AND FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 227-161-35, 36 AND 38, 227-171-22 AND 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, AND 36, AND 227-211-24 AND 39 THROUGH 43. A Rectals 1 A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01, Development Agreement 01-02, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report, Victona Gardens Protect, City of Rancho Cucamonga, SCH#20010301028" has been presented to this Commission with the Commission's consideration of the Victona Community Amendment 01-01 and Development Agreement 01-02 2 The public comment penod for the EIR was duly and lawfully closed on November 5, 2001, following due notices to the public and all applicable public agenGes 3 On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the certification of the EIR 4 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on January 9, and January 23, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds and concludes as follows a The Final EIR prepared for Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01, Development Agreement 01-02, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 has been completed in compliance Huth the provisions of the California Environmental Quality ACT, California Public Resource Code Sections 21000 et seq (CEQA) with the State and the City Gwdelines for implementing CEQA, and all other applicable laws and regulations ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT January 23, 2002 Page 2 b The Final EIR was presented to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR pnorto the Planning Commission's consideration of the proposed project 3 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth rn paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify the Final EIR and adopt the Statement of Facts and Findings and Ovemding Considerations 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Laity T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-Hnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS F(~ 1 • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH#20010301028) AND APPROVING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS AND FINDINGS AND THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716 FOR A PROPOSED PROJECT KNOWN AS VICTORIA GARDENS, A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 2 45 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, OFFICE AND CIVIC USES, AND UP TO 600 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ON APPROXIMATELY 175 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY FUTURE CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, I-15 FREEWAY TO THE EAST, AND FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 227-161-35, 36 AND 38, 227-171-22 AND 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, AND 36, AND 227-211-24 AND 39 THROUGH 43. A Rentals . 1. A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01, DevelopmentAgreement 01-02, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 Forest City Development entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report, Victona Gardens Protect, City of Rancho Cucamonga, SCH#20010301028" has been presented to this Council with the Counal's consideration of the Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01 and Development Agreement 01-02 2. The public comment penod for the EIR was duly and lawfully closed on November 5, 2001, following due notices to the public and all applicable public agenaes 3 On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng to review and consider the information contained m the Final EIR, the Statement of Facts and Findings, and the Statement of Ovemdmg Considerations, pnorto the Planning Commission's consideration of the proposed protect entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report, Victona Gardens Protect, City of Rancho Cucamonga, SCH#2001-3-1028," and recommended approval per Planning Commission Resolution No 02= 4 On , 2002, the City Councl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public heanng to review and consider the mforrnation contained m the Final EIR, the Statement of Facts and Findings, and the Statement of Ovemdmg Considerations, pnor to the Counal's consideration of the proposed protect entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report, Victoria Gardens Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, SCH#20010301028 " 5 All legal prerequisites pnorto the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows Ft~2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. EIR FOR VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT Page 2 1. This Councl hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recdals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Councl dunng the above- referenced public heanng on , 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, and the consideration of the contents of the Final EIR, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows. a The Final EIR prepared for Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01, Development Agreement 01-02, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT15716 has been completed m compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality ACT, California Public Resource Code Sections 21000 et seq (CEQA) with the State and the City Gudelines for implementing CEQA, and all other applicable laws and regulations. b The Final EIR was presented to the Council and the Council reviewed and considered the information contained m the Final EIR pnor to the consideration of the proposed project 3 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby takes the following actions a Certifies the Final EIR to be m compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality ACT, California Public Resource Code Sections 21000 et seq (CEQA) with the State and the City Guidelines for implementing CEQA, and all other applicable laws and regulations b. Adopts a Statement of Facts and Findings for the EIR and a Statement of Ovemding Considerations attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B" respectively, based on the following findings: 1) The facts and findings set forth m the Statement of Facts and Findings and the Statement of Ovemdmg Considerations are supported by substantial evidence m the administrative record and the Final EIR 2) The Final EIR identified all significant environmental impacts of the protect and there are no known potentially significant environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR 3) All significant impacts identified m the Frnal EIR as a result of the protect have been identified, avoided, or reduced to an acceptable level by the imposition of miUgahon measures on the protect These mitigation measures are attached hereto as part of the Mitigation Momtonng Program and are incorporated herein by the reference 4) The Final EIR considered a reasonable range of alternatives to the protect Potential mitigation or protect alternatives have been incorporated into the protect to reduce the impacts 5) The cumulative impacts of the protect m relation to other protects m the area have been considered. Except forthe identified unavoidable impacts descnbed m the Statement of Facts of Fmdmgs and the Final EIR, mitigation measures are incorporated into the protect to reduce such impacts to less than significant levels. • • F1~3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. EIR FOR VCPA 01-01, DA 01-02, TPM SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT • Page 3 6) The unavoidable significant impacts of the project as identified in the Statement of Facts of Findings and the Final EIR is outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the project identified in the Statement of Ovemding Considerations 4. The Secretary to the City Counal shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. i F~~ Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations Regarding the Environmental Effects from the Victoria Gardens Project (SCH # 2001031028) I. INTRODUCTION The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("this Council") hereby adopts this ensue document, including the Statement of Ovemding Considerations in Section VII below, as its findings ("Findings'") pursuant to the California Eavuonmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for the Victona Gazdens protect ("Protect") descnbed in the Final Envnonmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Protect, State Cleannghouse Number 2001031028 The "protect" as descnbed in the FE1R includes all discretionary actions that will be considered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City"), the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and other public agencies that may have approval authonty over aspects of the Protect City's discretionary actions in approving ilie Protect will include 1) the General Plan Amendment, 2) the Victona Cotmttuntty Plan Amendment, 3) the Development Agreement, 4) the Master Plan, and 5) the Tentative Parcel Map, for the Vtctona Gazdens Protect In considenng the potential benefits of the proposed Protect, the Ctty ident~ed the following objectives that will be achieved upoa development of the protect site Implementation of the regionally onen[ed commercial development envisioned for the protect site in [he General Plan and Victona Community Plan, Development of commercial uses that will attract established businesses, which will strengthen economic viability of the Ctty, Augmentation of the City's economic base by providing sales and property tax-generating uses, Creation of employment opportumhes for citizens of the City and sunounding conuruimhes, Creation of a place for people to spend time, for children and families, a place with colorful plants, shops, and graphics, a place with a toav square, pedestnan paseos, shaded courtyards, outdoor dining, and fountains, Meeting the demands of the community for shopping opporhinities, by expanding retail options to an azea on the east side of the City, Creation of a successful, regional retail environment, set in shady, landscaped streets with a feel of walkable Main Streets, and with stiilang mountain vistas, Creation of a vibrant and active downtown, which can accommodates the civic activities, commerce and public events resulting from the interaction of businesses, residents, and visitors, and Capture of retail sales that may be lost to adtacent cities These Findings aze based upon the entire record before this Council, including the Final E1R prepazed for the Protect The EIR was prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency under the California Envuonniental Quality Act (CEQA) ~~~ II. PROJECT' SUMMARY A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 174-acre protect site has been assembled m the eastern portion of the Ctty, through the combination of 147 acres of (Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga) Redevelopment Agency controlled property, 18 acres of undeveloped property, and 9 acres of land previously dedtcated for sheet nght-of--ways At ultuttate build out, the project stte wtll mclude approxtmately 2 45 mtlhon squaze feet of retail, office, and ctvtc uses as well as up to 600 multiple-faintly residential amts The development scenano for the proposed Vtctona Gardens envtstons development of a "new downtoav" constshng of an open au mixed use complex whtch mcludes an attractive and compatible blend of mayor retail tenants, specialty commerc[e] uses, restaurant and entertainment outlets, office uses, restdenhal dwellings, and cormnumty facthhes These uses will be built along a setting that is remtmscent of a tradthonal "main street" with interesting streetscapes exlubthng mdtvtdually designed storefronts, under sidewalks, street furmture, and Lmdscapmg including pocket pazks Second story office space will be built above portions of some retail uses to accommodate professional uses (medicaUdental offices, accountants, lawyers, etc) The project will mclude a vanety of sit-down restaurants, cafes, and coffeehouses The proposed protect will mclude civic and cultural uses that may mclude a branch library, commumty play house, performing arts theater, or comitiumty center The use of landscaping, awnings, canopies, sun shelters, misting systems and other azchitectural elements will serve to help shield patrons of the shopping distract from extreme weather conditions The azea located between Foothill Boulevazd and the future Vrctona Gardens Lane will be developed vnth fast food . uses, automobile sernce station(s), restaurants, and retail uses Thts area anll be onented to vehicle traffic The azea of the Vtctona Gardens project, which directly abuts I-15 maybe developed with either retail or office/hotel uses The proposed Vtctona Gardens protect mcludes the development of up to 600 multiple-family residential amts These dwelling amts will be located north of the "new downtown," wtthm wallang distance of commerc[e], public, and ctvtc uses The residential component of the proposed project may mclude clubhouse facthhes, recreatronal features, or open space reserved for the exclusive use of prgect residents The Final EIR evaluated the potential environmental effecu that would result from the development of proposed project The "project" under CEQA, for purposes of the City's dtscrehonary actran(s) is the approval of the amendments to the General Plan and Vtctona Commumty Plaq approval of the Development Agreement, and approval of the Master Plan, which together will govern the development of the Vtctona Gazdeas Protect site Specifically, the proposed discretionary actions by the Ctty vnll mclude City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment (GPA) Changes ilte destgnahon of the protect sue from Regional Center (RC) to Mixed Use (MU), modifies established cntena for the spacing of roadway medians Vtctona Community Plan Amendment (VCPA) Changes the destgnahon of the project site from Regional Center to Mixed Use, modtfies text and graphics Development Ageement vests land use entitlements Master Plan sets forth the pertrutted land uses and development standazds for the protect srte Approval of Tentative Pazcel Maps subdivides the protect site for commerc[e] uses In addition, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency will consider a Dtsposihon and Development Agreement govemmg terms for disposmon and use of the portion of the Project site currently owned by the Redevelopment Agency F ~`~' B. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The pnmary goal of the Vtctona Gardens protect is to provide residents of the Ctty with a convenient, accessible, and affordable retail uses which compliments existing retazl uses within the Ctty, and along Foothill 13oulevazd Other objectives of the Project include the following Ensure that development of the site is in accordance with estabhshed functional standazds and design and aesthetic standazds contained in the Vtctona Comnnuvty Plan, including the incorporation of certain elements representative of cotnmumty hentage styles found within the Ctty Thus providing the Ctty with a development, which creates a distinctive "downtown" envuonment Implement the regionally onented commercial development ennsioned for the project sne in the General Plan and Victona Com®mtty Plan. Ensure the commercial development will attract estabhshed businesses, which will strengthen economic viability Meet the demands of the community for shopping oppoitunihes, by expanding retail options to an area on the east side of the Cny Create a mixed use neighborhood with public spaces, shopping, entertainment, residences, offices and cmc uses, within walking distance Create a place for people to spend tune, for children and families, a place with colorful plants, shops, and graphics, a place with a town square, pedestnan paseos, shaded courtyards, outdoor duung, and fountains Create a successful, regional retail environment, set m shady, landscaped streets mth a feel of walkable Mam Streets, and with stnking mountain vistas • Augment the City's economic base by providing sales and property tax-generating uses Create employment oppoitunihes for citizens of the Ctty and surrounding cominumhes provtde commercial development in conformance oath applicable policies and programs included in the City's General Plan, inclusive of the rezoning of a pomon of the sue Create a vibrant and active downtown, which can accommodates the cmc activities, commerce and public events resulting from the interaction of businesses, residenu, and visitors Capture retail sales that maybe lost to adjacent cores III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga previously conducted environmental review for development of the Project sne On March 19, 1984, HFA Associates and the City's Redevelopment Agency signed a participation agreement for a redevelopment project lmown as the Rancho Redevelopment Protect This agreement was intended [o result in the development of a regional shopping center within the area bounded by Day Creek Boulevard, Mdler Avenue (Church Street), and Vtctona Loop (now Victona Gazdens Lane) Under the terms of the agreement, Redevelopment Agency funds were to be used for the acquisition of the project site for sale to HFA Associates (the redeveloper) The redeveloper would then have the responsibility [o prepare and obtain Ctty approval for site plans and related documents The redeveloper sought approval of the regional mall project via a Condmonal Use Perini[ (CPU) 84-06 The regional shopping center proposed under CPU 84-06 envisioned atwo-story mall with approximately 170 shops and six major department stores connected by an av-condmoned pedestrian mall The proposed project included approximately 1,242,000 square feet of retail uses divided amongst six major retail tenanu (838,000 square feet), mall shops (325,000 squaze feet), ancillary buildings (69,000 squaze feet), 5,950 parking spaces, . and required community service amenities/facilities The project was onented for maximum visibility for Interstate IS (I-15) and to allow for easy access via the freeway and Foothill Boulevard Four major access points into the project site were planned, one each at Day Creek Boulevard and Miller Avenue, and two on ~~~ • Victoria Loop (Vrctona Gazdens Lane) Ancillary stmctures located away from the mall were to include restaurants, financral rnshtunons, and automotive sernce providers A Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SCH No 80050706), addressing three specr5c issues (drainage, traffic, and aesthetics) assocrated anth achvrhes perimtted under Condrhon Use Permit 84-06, was certified by the Crty Council in October 1984 Portrons of land included in the protect sue aze adjacent to the Vrctona Arbors Village protect srte and have been prenously analyzed in the Vrctona Arbors Village EIR (SCH #98041137) Although portions of the protect site have received prevrous environmental clearance, the entire 174-acre protect sue rs included in the environmental docrinrentahon prepared for the Vrctona Gazdens protect To date, no development has taken place that was analyzed in the Vrctona Arbors Village EIK. The following rs a summary of the Crty's CEQA renew for thrs Protect A Notice of Preparation (NOP) and hvhal Study rdenhfyurg the scope of environmental rsues, were drstnbuted to 41 federal, state and local agencres, orgam7ahons and/or indrnduals on March 6, 2001, and nonce was provrded through pubhcahon on Mazch 7, 2001, in the Inland Valley Daily Bullets A total of nine comment letters were received Copres of those comment letters aze included in Appendix A of the Draft EIR (under separate cover) Relevant comments received in response to the NOP/Imhal Study were incorporated into the Draft EIR The Draft EIR was drstnbuted for pubhc review on September 17, 2001, fora 45-0ay renew period with the comment period expuurg on November 5, 2001 Seven cornarent letters were received at the close of the pubhc comment period The responses to co~rents are included in the Final EIR. A Notice of Completion (NOC) was sent mth the Draft EIIt to the State Clearinghouse on September 21, 2001, and notice was provided on September 21, 2001 in the Liland Valley Dady Bulletin. The Final EIR was distributed fora 10-0ay period beginning on December 24, 2001 The Rancho Cucamonga PLuining Corr~rssron held a pubhc hearing to consider various Project approvals and staff reco~nendahons on January 23, 2002 Following pubhc testunony, and staff recoamrendahons, the Connnrsston recommended to the Crry Council that the FEIR rs adequate and should be certified and that the Crty Council adopt these Findings and Statement of Ovemding Considerations and approve the Protect On February _, 2002, the Crry Council held a pubhc hearing to consider the Protect and staff recorrrmendahons Following pubhc testunony and staff recontmendahons, the Crty Council certified the FEIIt and hereby adopts these Findings and Statement of Ovemding Considerations A. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT FINDING The Crty of Rancho Cucamonga retained LSA Associates, Inc , to prepaze the Draft and Fural EIR The Draft and Final EIRs were prepazed under the direction and supervision of the Crry of Rancho Cucamonga Corranumty Development Department, Planning Division Finding: The Draft and Final EIRs reflect the Crtl~s independent lodgment The Crty has exerersed its independent lodgment in accordance oath Pubhc Resources Code, Section 210821(c)(3) in retaining its own F~~ 4 enwonmental consultan; drrecttng the consultant m preparation of the Draft and Ftal EIRs, as well as revrewutg, analyzing, and reveutg inatenal prepared by the consultant B. GENERAL FINDING ON MITIGATION MEASURES The Ctty has renewed the mitigation measures rdenhfied m the Final EIR The City has detemnned that in preparing the condrtions of approval for Vrctona Gazdens prolec; the City incorporated the mrtigahon measures recommended m the Final EIR, except where detemnned infeasible as decussed below in these Findings In the event that the conditions of approval do not use the exact wording of the rmhgahon measures recommended in the Final EIR, in each such instance, the adopted conditions of approval aze intended to be identical or substantially sunilaz to the reconmtended mitigation measure Any minor reveions were made for the purpose of improving clanty or to better define the intended purpose Findings: Unless specifically stated to the contrary in these 5ndings, rt e the Cit}rs intent to adopt all mitigation measures recommended by the Final EIR If a measure has, through error, been omitted from the Conditions of Approval or from these Findings, and that measure a not specifically reflected m these Findings, that measure shall be deemed to be adopted pursuant to this paragraph Additionally, unless specifically stated to the contrary in these Findutgs, all Conditions of Approval repeating or rewording minganon measures recommended in the Final EIR are intended to be substantially smulaz to the mitigation measmes as worded in the Final and are found to be equally effective in avoiding or lessenwg the identified enwo~ental r~tact IV. ENVII20NMENTAL IMPACTS AND FINDINGS City staff reports, the FEIl2, wntten and oral testimony at all relevant public meetings or heanngs, and these Facts, Findings and Statement of Ovemding Consideranons and other mfomrahon in the adminetrative record serve as the base for the City's enwonmental determination The detailed analyse of potential enwonmental unpacts and proposed mitigation measures for the Victorta Gardens Protect are presented in Chapter 4 of the DEIR Responses to connnents and any reveions/omesions to the DEIR are provided in Appendix G, or indicated by shilcethough (delenons) or double-underline (additions) in the FEIR, respectively The DEIR evaluated six mayor environmental categones (traffic and cuculahon, noee, air quality, biological resources, cultural sernces, and public sernces) for potential significant adverse unpacts, including ctmnilative unpacts Both project-specific, short- and long-term, and ciinwlahve unpacts were evaluated In addition to the six major enwonmental categones addressed in the DEIR, ten other major categones were found to be nonsignificant in the Imnal Study prepared for the Vrctona Gazdens Protect Excep[ as may be otherwee expressly pronded herein, these Finduigs incorporate the conclusions on these categones as outlined m the Luna] Study (Appendix A of the DEIR) and the Crty finds that no significant mgiacts have been identified as to those categones identified in the huttal Study and no further analyse a required. A, IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THE DE1R AS LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT REQUIRING NO MITIGATION The following esues were identified in the huhal Study (Appendix A of the DEIR) as having the potential to cause significant impact and were tamed forward to the DEIR for detailed evaluation These esues were found m the DEIR as r ~~ • having no potential to cause significant intact and therefore requue no project-spec~5c rmtigation. In the following presentation, each resource issue a identified and the potential for significant adverse envuonmentai effects u decussed I. TRAFFIC AND CIItCUALTION a. Project Access Less than Significant Impact: The add~hon of project haffic to year 2007 and year 2020 conditions will not have a significant unpact on the project access dnveways on Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, V~ctona Gardens Lane, and Foothill Boulevard Finding: An analyse of protect access u included m Section 4 1 of the FEIR Thu analyse concluded that in~pace at the proposed project dnveways aze considered to be less than significant No mitigation u requued. Facts and Analysis in Support of the I'tinding: Analyses of the protect dnveways under year 2007 with project and yeaz 2020 with project cond~hons indicate that all project access dnveways will operate mth satisfactory levels of sernce based on the tum restnchons and stop conhol proposed as part of the protect 2. NOISE a. Parking Lot Activity Less than Significant Impact: Noise levels resulting from typical parlang lot activities will not be s~gntficanily increased in a manner that would create a potential mipact to adjacent land uses Finding: Potential none unpactc resulting from development of the proposed project are addressed in Section 4 2 of the FEIR The analyse concluded that, none associated vnth the pazking lot activities in the proposed commercial and office use azeas will not have any s~gmficant m~pact on oft=srte or on- sue residences such as residences, schools, hospitals and snmlaz uses No rnitigahon a requved. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: Representative pazking actinties, such as customer conversing or door closing, would generate mterauttent, maximum noee levels of appro:nmately 60 dBA at 50 feet The level of nose a much lower than that of the traffic on the azea roads or the loading/unloading of [nicks. Therefore, ~t e not anticipated that noee associated with the pazking lo[ achv~ties in the proposed co~nerctal and office use azeas will have any significant unpact on off-site or on-srte residences b. 'IYansportation to Constriction Srte Impacts Less than Significant Impact: Noise resulting from the transport of constmction egnipment to the project site will not significanily increase noee levels m the vicinity of the proposed protect Fmdmg: Potential nose mq~acts resulting from development of the proposed protect are addressed in Section 4 2 of the FEIR The analyse concluded that, noee associated with the movement of constmchon eginpment to the project stte will not have any significant unpact on off-sde or on-site residences No mitigation a regmred ~O 6 Facts and Analysis m Support of the Finding: Transport of construction egwpmenUmatenals to the project stte and • worker com~rte would incrementally increase notse levels on access roads leading to the site Although there would be relatively htgh stngle event notse exposures (up to 87 dBA L~ at 50 feet from passing trucks), when averaged over a longer penod of tune such as one hour or etght hours the effect inlong-term ambtent noise levels would be small and neghgtble Therefore, short-teen construction notse trrtpacts assoctated wtth worker commute and egmpment transport would not result in stgmficant adverse urtpacts on noise sensmve receptors along the access routes leading to the proposed project stte c. Cumulative Noise Impacts Less than Significant Impact: CYt~tlahve noose intpacts resulting from the ttansport of constmchon egtupment to the project stte will not stgntficantly increase noee levels in the ncrmty of the proposed project Finding: Potential noee impacts resulting from development of the proposed project are addressed in Section 4.2 of the FEIR The analyse concluded that, cumttlahve noee unpacts in the vtcuuty of the project site and the Ctty will not be significant No mitigation a requued Facts and Analysis is Support o[ the Finding: The short-term construction noee and long-term operational none impacts (pazkutg lot activity, loading/unloading activity, and tmffic noee) associated mth the proposed project were determined to be less than significant The proposed project's short-terrrt consttuchon activity and on-site stationary sources are localized noee sources and would only affect land uses urmtedtately adjacent to the protect site with duect line of sight of the project boundary These noee sources aze not considered cumulative Constmchon and operations (excluding vehtculaz traffic) at other off-sne locations would not currailahvely add to project related noee unpacts 3. AIIt QUALITY a. Long Term Microscale Projections Less than Significant Impact: Although development of the proposed project will add new vehtculaz tops to future traffic volumes in the project vicinity, detenomhng the level of sernce at some adjacent intersections, a corresponding increase in carbon monoxide (CO) hot spots will not occur Finding: Potential impacts related to this issue are discussed in Section 4 3 of the FEIR Based on the analysts provided in the FEIR, composite CO levels would be below both the State and federal one hour and eight how CO standazds Therefore, project related CO concentration increases aze not considered stgmficant No mitigation is required Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: An assessment of project related ttttpacts on localized ambient au quality requires that future ambient au quality levels be projected Because the proposed project would add new vehtculaz tops to future traffic volumes in the project vtctmty, detenoration in the level of sernce at adjacent intersections would occur as a result of the proposed project Localized CO hot spot analysts was requued and conducted At many receptor locations, there would be a reduction in the CO concentrations with implementation of the project Because the composite CO levels would be below both the State and federal one hour and eight how CO • standazds, these project related CO concentration increases aze not considered significant F`~\ 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a. Impacts to On-ste Drainage Less than Significant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will not alter and/or eliminate on-srte drainage in a manner that is significant Finding: Potential impacts related to this issue aze discussed in Section 4 4 of the FEIR Based on the analysis provided in the FEIR, impacts to thus drainage will not be considered signnficant due to the fact that the drainage is non-wetland waters and that the drainage is isolated from other wetland waters No mitigation is requnred Facts and Analysts m Support of the Finding: Impacts to the drainage cvrll not be considered sigmficant due to the fact that the drainage anon-wetland waters and that the drainage is tsolated from other wetland waters Adherence to measures set forth by all applicable perauts will eliminate any associated impacts b. Impacts to Special Interest Species Less than Significant Impart: Development of the proposed project will not significanily impact "special interest" plant and/or aitnnml species Finding: Potential impacts related to this issue are discussed in Section 4 4 of the FEIR However, none of these species aze fisted as a threatened or endangered species Due to the degradation of the protect sue, and the fact that these spectes aze not fisted as a threatened or endangered, potential impacts associated mth this issue aze not stgmficant No mitigation is required Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding. The results of the literature review indicated the potential occurrence of 29 special interest plant and anunal species in the protect vicimty Of these 29 spectes, 21 aze considered absent based on the lack of suitable habitat or based on focused survey results Of the remaining 8 spectes, 2 aze present, 2 aze considered to have a moderate to high probability of occurrence, and 4 aze considered to have a low probability of occurrence The special interest species occumng or potentially occumng on the project srte include Plummers tnanposa lily (Calochortus plummerae) Parry's spineflower (Chortznthe parryr var parry:) Pansh's desert thorn (Lyceum panshu) San Diego homed lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blarnwller) Orange-throated whtptail (Cnemrdophorus hyperthrus) Western mashf bat (Eumops perotrs cal:fornrcus) Westem burrowing owl (Athene cunrculana hypugea) Bell's sage spazow (Amphrspna belh belly) The western burrowing owl was observed on srte dunng the San Bemazdino kangazoo rat survey Based on tats sighting, the owl is considered to currently occupy the srte However, the owl was only observed during two surveys, and not during the focused surveys for the California gnatcatcher The infrequency of the sightings during the surveys indicates that there aze low numbers of burrowing owls that may use the site for foraging habitat The burrowing owl is not listed as a threatened or endangered spectes Potential mtpacts to the few individuals or the foraging habitat used by low numbers of individuals aze not considered stgnif~cant F~2 g The Deparmient of Fish and Game Codes (DFG) 3503 and 3503 5 prohibit the destruction of individual owls and owl nests Certain measures will be requved to ensure that the protect is in accordance with the DFG Code Additional surveys will be requued pnor to conshuchon to ensure that no bunowing owls will be on site during construction activities If burrowing owls are present on site, the owls may be passively relocated, during the non- breeding season (September 1 to January 31), by placing one-way doors on the borrow entrances Owls cannot be passively relocated duning the breeding season and a 250-foot buffer zone would be requued to avoid disturbance to the owl nest (buaow) per DFG Codes 3503 and 3503 3 The bell's sage spanow was observed on site during the yeaz 2001 SBKR and Cahfomia gnatcatcher focused surveys However, this species is not hsted as a threatened or endangered species Due to the degradation of the sue, and the fact that the bud is not listed as a threatened or endangered species, potential unpacts to the species are not significant DFG Code 3503 5 prohibits the destruction of bud nests Certain measures will be requued to ensure that the protect is in accordance with the DFG Code The protect will need to be cleared dunng the non-breeding season of (September 1-January 31) for this species The San Diego homed lizazd was observed approximately 1 0 mile north (north of Baseline Road) of the protect sue in 1998 Swtable habitat for this species is present on site, although n was not observed on site However, this species is not listed as federally or state endangered or threatened and impacts to this species aze not significant Based on surveys, no federally or state listed threatened or endangered species aze present on site Thus, there will be no impacts to federally or state listed threatened or endangered species No mitigation is requved c. Impacts to the San Bernardino kangaroo rat Less than Significant Impart: Development of the proposed protect will not significantly impact the San Bernardino kangazoo rat (Drpodomys memamr parvus), a federally listed endangered species Finding: Potential impacts related to this issue aze discussed in Section 4 4 of the FEIR The focused trapping survey for the SBICR revealed that the species does not occur on the protect site, therefore, no significant impact to this species will occur No mitigation is requued Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding. The San Bemazdino kangaroo rat (SBICR) was emergency listed as endangered on January 27, 1998 (USFWS, 1998) and fatal fisted on September 24, 1998 The site is located within the azea proposed for designation as cnhcal habitat for the SBKR and may meet some lunited cntena for the designated cnhcal habitat, i e , rt has some lunited, severely degraded habitat, and a limited portion of it is currently subJect to natural processes that potentially could reJuveaate and maintain habitat (flooding) The focused trapping survey for the SBKR revealed that the species does not occur on the protect site 'Plus fact and the lack of a viable comdor from either the north or south leaves the subJect property coii~letely isolated from azeas occupied by the species Due to the absence of SBICR from the sne and the low value of the sue as cnhcal habitat, potential unpacts to the speaes (i a ,loss of proposed cnhcal habitat) aze not considered significant d. Impacts to the California gna[catcher Less than Significant Impart: Development of the proposed protect will not significantly impact the California goatcatcher (Pohopnla calrjornrca calrfornica), a federally listed threatened species F`~3 9 . Finding: Potential Impacts related to flits Issue aze discussed m Section 4 4 of the FEIR The entve protect site was surveyed for the presence of the Cahfomia gnatcatcher. The focused surveys revealed that this species is not present on-site, therefore, no sigmficant impact to the Califoinia gnatcatcher wdl occur No mitigation is requved Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding. The Cahforma gnatcatcher is a small insectivorous bud found almost exclusively within coastal sage scmb habitat from Los Angeles County south to upper Bala Califorma The California gnatcatcher was listed under the federal ESA as a threatened species on Mazch 25, 1993 The srte u not within cnhcal habitat for the Cahforma gnatcatcher The Caldornia gnatcatcher cnhcal habitat is approxmiately one and a half miles to [he northwest The entve srte was surveyed for the presence of the Cahfomia gnatcatcher The focused survey conducted for the Cahforma gnatcatcher revealed that the species is not present on the protect srte e. Impacts Related to Habitat Fragmentation/Wildlife Movement Less than Significant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will not significantly irripact the movement of wildlife m the vicuuty of the protect srte and/or result m the fragmentation of wildlife habitat Finding: Potential impacts related [o this issue aze discussed m Section 4 4 of the FEIR. No wildlife comdor extends, or is m proxumty, to the habitat of the proposed protect site The habitat on sue is disjunct and m a highly urbanised azea, therefore, unpacts related to this issue aze less than . sigmficant No mitigation is requved Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding. Habitat fragmentation occurs when a single, umfied habitat azea is dmded into two or more areas, such that the dinsion isolates the two aeeas from each other Isolation of habitat lmuts the free movement of wildlife from one pomon of habitat to another, or from one habitat type to another The wildlife movement on the Vtctona Gazdens srte u mainly restncted to localised movements because linkages to surrounding habitats aze limited by existing bamers, pnmanly motor roadways (Foothill Boulevazd on the south and the I-15 on the southeast) and approved residential housing developments (to the north and west) No vnldhfe comdor extends, or is m proxmuty, to the habitat of the proposed protect sue The habitat on sue is disjunct and m a highly urbanized area Therefore, the proposed protect will not result m significant mipacts on wildlife movement routes or contnbute to habitat fragmentation f. Impacts to Local and Regional Pohcies/MSHCP Less than SigmScant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will not conflict with local and/or regional policies established for the preservation/protection of biological resources Finding: Potential unpacts related to this issue aze discussed m Section 4 4 of the FEIR The proposed protect would not conflict with any local or regional policies/ordinances protectmg/preservmg bwlogical resources, therefore, uripacts related to this issue aze less than significant No rruhgahon is requued Facts and Analysis m Support of the Finding. The North Ehwanda Open Space Habitat Preservation Program • (NEOSHPP) was adopted by the San Bemazdmo Boazd of Supervrsors on Apnl 26, 1994 The NEOSHPP area is located northeasterly of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is roughly bounded by Deer Creek on the west, the City of Fontana on the east, the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the south, and the San Bemardmo National Forest on the north The malonty of the program azea is mthm the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga sphere-of-influence, with a small Fey ~o pomon being within the City of Fontana sphereof-influence and the remaining area being within the National Forest • boundary The 7,243-acre program area was estabhshed in 1994 The protect site is not within the NEOSHPP area The County of San Benutrdino, the USFWS, the CDFG, and 14 affected cities aze currently involved with the preparation of a regional a Valley-Wide Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (VMSHCP) for tazget species and associated habitats This conservation plan is not yet approved and, therefore, cannot be reviewed as to its potential relevance to the proposed protect The Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga has a tree preservation ordinance to protect hentage trees, including all eucalyptus windrows and trees in excess of 15 feet in height The windrows of eucalyptus trees and the individual eucalyptus tree in the center of the site fall under the definition of hentage trees The tree ordinance allows for the removal of hentage trees by filing a Tree Removal Permit with the Ctty Planner Removal of the eucalyptus trees is not considered significant and no mitigation is requued However, the City may irrgiose measures (such as replanting) as apart of the permit process that must be implemented g. Impacts to Plant Communities Less than Significant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will ehminate approximately 54 0 acres of disturbed Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS), approxunately 20 0 acres of noa-native grasslinds, and approxunately 100 0 acres of abandoned vineyards Fmdmg: Potential unpacts related [o this issue aze discussed in Section 4 4 of the FEIR. Because the pro3ect site does not host endangered/threatened species and because of the significant degradation and isolation of the protect site, impacts to on-site plant communities are not significant No mitigation is requued . Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding. Impacts resulting from the pro3ect will include approximately 54 acres to disturbed Riversrdean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS), approxunately 20 acres to non-native grasslands, and approximately 100 acres of abandoned vineyards The disturbed RAFSS on site is not a contiguous block of habitat The 54 acres of disturbed RAFSS aze distributed in two locations on site, ranging from 7 to 47 acres The patch of RAFSS in the northern portion of the protect sue is adjacent to Victona Arbors Village, an approved development sue that will no longer sustain a RAFSS community The lack of any threatened or endangered species further indicates the low habitat value of the site Impacts to RAFSS are not significant because of the degradation and isolation of the site h. Impacts to Wetlands Less than Significant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will not uripact on-site wetlands Fmdmg: Because no wetlands aze present on-site, niipacts associated with this issue are less than significant No [mhgahon is requued Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding. Per focused surveys, and the absence of hydrophytic vegetation, n was detemnned that no wetlands are present within the protect boundanes i. Impacts to Raptor Habitat Less than Significant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will not significanily impact foraging sites for . raptor species F~-s ~~ Finding: Potential uvpacts related to this issue are discussed in Section 4 4 of the FEIR Due to the extensive home range of these raptors, the loss of foraging habitat for raptors is not considered to be a signilicant irnpact No mitigation is requved Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding. The golden eagle, red-shouldered hawk and burrowing owl were observed on site While these species were observed foraging on site, due to lack of suitable nesting habitat (the red- shoulderedhawk nests in dense npanan azeas and the golden eagle nests typically on stiffs, although may also nest in large trees in open areas), it rs not likely that the golden eagle or the red-shouldered hawk nest on site The eucalyptus trees aze potentially nesting habitat, however, no nests (nor nesting behavior) were observed on site The foraging azea of these raptors is extensive, the golden eagle in southern California has a temtonal and foraging azea of approxunately 36 squaze miles The lunited lmowledge available on the red-shouldered hawk home ranges points to a temtonal and foraging azea between 156 and 480 acres (in Michigan) Due to the extensive home range of these raptors, the loss of foraging habitat for raptors is not considered to be a significant inrpact DFG Code and the Migratory Bud Treaty Act prohibits the take of raptor nests and certain measures must be unplemented by die protect to be in compliance Proposed protect construction activities (that may result in the destmchon of acave raptor nests) should be scheduled outside the peak raptor nesting season (Mazch through July) j. Cumulative Impacts to Biological Resources Less than Significant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will not have a significant currnilahve u7pact on biological resources on/adtacent to the protect site and within the region. Finding: Potential uripacts related to this issue aze discussed in Section 4 4 of the FEIR Due to the degradation of the area and the fragmentation of habitat by interstate freeways, state routes, and residential and mdustnal development, the loss of habitat resulnng from implementanon of the proposed protect is not considered sigmf~cant Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding. The study azea between the proposed SR-30 and SR-60 Day Creek watershed has approxtma[ely 2,300 acres of undeveloped land with sunilaz habitat to the proposed protect (acave and abandoned vineyazds) The 174 acres of the Vtctona Gazdens proposed protect will conmbute to the loss of approximately 8 percent of the undeveloped land in the azea Other approved and proposed protects (including the Victona Gazdens protect) within the study azea will contnbute to the loss of 612 of the 2,300 acres, or approxunately 27 percent Given the current rate of development within the study azea, the accessibility to bi- or m-modal transit (railway, interstate, and auport), and the fact that the azea is slated for development, n is reasonable to predict that all 2,300 acres will be developed in the future The 2,300-acre azea has been histoncally used for agncultural purposes and is degraded habitat Due to the degradation of the azea and the fragmentation of habitats by interstate freeways, state routes, and residential and industnal development, the loss of habitat (8 percent of the total undeveloped habitat) from the site is not considered significant 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES a. Impacts to On-site Cultural Resources Less than Significant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will not sigaificanily alter and/or eliminate archeological resources 1 ~ 12 Finding: Potential impacts related to this issue are discussed in Section 4 5 of the FEIR The proposed pro3ect call have a less than significant inipact on the Foothill Fieldstone Stockpiles since it does not meet the cntena for hshng on the Cahfomia Register of Htstonc Resources No mitigation is required Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The western two-thirds of the pazcel is planted in grapevines interspersed with dumping sites containing non-indigenous cobbles and gravels, chunks of concrete, asphalt, automobile parts, appliances, coinoperated video game cabinets, toes, lumber, pieces of wood and metal, and miscellaneous household refuse A homeless person shelter/habitahon srte was encountered under the only tree in the southeast quarter of the site The eastern portion of the pazcel is crossed from north to south by a wash that provides exposures of the upper three feet of sedunent oa the parcel The onginal ground surface was severely inipacted by rock removal methods that allowed vines to be planted, and subsequently impacted by cultivation and dusting associated with agnculture The remainder of the parcel u covered by grapevines, native plants, weeds, and grasses mth a surface vuibihty of approximately 50 to 80 percent The survey crew encountered the remnant of an abandoned irngahon system, CA-SBR-7095H, consisting two rows of precast concrete standpipe, rt u not known whether it was associated with the Ellena Winery, but a was cleazly used to irrigate the vineyazds on the parcel The ungahon system has been partially destroyed by flooding along the north/south wash. Thu resource u not knowa to be associated with hutoncally significant events or important persons, and it does not embody distinctive chamctenshcs, represent the work of an unportant creative individual, or possess high artistic values It u not likely to yield important histoncal information, therefore, it u not a significant resource Three very lazge piles of cobbles and boulders, which had probably been cleazed from the vineyazd, and trace lustonc refuse were also observed in the pro3ect area Hrstoncally, on the lower slopes of the fanglomerates from the San Gabnel Mountains, boulders had to be removed to make land available for agnculture These boulders were either stockpiled or placed as hedgerows along property boundanes It u possible that laborers from the Chinese labor camp, reported to be located one mile north of the pazcel (Lanka, this records search), could have been involved in clearing the pazcel The date range of the clearance is unknown. Due to the unknown affilrahon and lacking a precise date of these stockpiles, their alteration or removal would not constitute a significant inrpact to cultural resources Designated, ISA-RCG131-1, LSA-RCG131-2, and ISA-RCG131-3 (Foothill Fieldstone Stockpiles), this lustonc site was recorded dunng the azcliaeological survey The Footlill Fieldstone Stockpiles do not appeaz to meet any of the cntena for listing on the Cahforma Register of Histonc Resources (PRC SS5024 1, Tile 14 CCR, Section 4852) Due to the unlmown affiliation and lacking a precise date of these stockpiles, their alteration or removal would not constitute a significant impact to cultural resources Recordation of the resource fulfills the requiements of niingahon No further work u recommended for this resource 6. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Impacts to Fve Protection Service Response 17mes Less than Significant Impact: Development of the proposed protect will not significantly alter Rancho Cucamonga Fie Distnc[ response tunes Finding: Potential impacts related to this issue aze discussed in Section 4 5 of the FEIR Because the pro3ect site is located mthin the 5-minute response azea of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct facilities, no significant inipact related to this issue will occur No mitigation is required F`~'~ 13 . Facts and Analysis in Support o[ the Finding: The Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Dtstnct has a standazd response trine threshold of five minutes, including call-in-tune Based on this standazd, the maxrmum travel trine would be three minutes Due to the project's location relative to Stahoas 3, 4, and 5, the srte is anhapated to fall within the 5 minute response time cntena b. Impacts to Water Supply Less than Significant Itnpact: Development of the proposed project will not srghtficanily rmpact the supply and/or drstnbuhon of water Finding: Potential impacts related to this rssue aze discussed in Section 4 6 of the FEIR The potential water demands assocrated with the development of the proposed on-srte uses have been anhcrpated in recent Gtircamonga County Water Drstnct (CCWD) Water Master Plans CCWD supplies the majonty water using both inrported surface water and local groundwater and these water sources aze expected to be available to meet sernce azea water demand in the future Therefore, the proposed project's water sernce rmpacts are consrdered to be less than srgnrficant No mitigation rs requued Facts and Analysis in Support of the Fmdmg: Future increases in the demand for water will be met with by aggressive capital rmprovement program, whrch includes construction of transnussron mains, well saes, increasing the reservorr storage capacrhes in all pressure zones, and mcreasmg the srze of the L W Mrchael Treatment Plant Most of all of these facilities are slated for completion wrtlun the next 10-15 years The Drstnct rs developing a reclauned water program, which will utilrze processed water from the Regronal Plant No 4 located at the southwest comer of Ehwanda Avenue and Sixth Street The reclarmed water wrll provide sernce to major landscaping and recreational areas and many pazl~way and medran island rurprovements • Based on CCWD water demand factors, development of the proposed Vrctona Gardens protect will increase water sernce demand to the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga by approximately 732 20 acre feet per year (654,000 gallons per day) The Cucamonga County Water Drstnct supplies an approzrtrrate average total of 40,000 acre feet per year (41 7 nullron gallons per day) Therefore, the increased water demand assocrated with thrs proposed project rs an increase of less than 2% of the current average total of water supplied by the Drstnct As prevrously stated, the project srte has been planned fora "Regronal Center" since at least 1981, therefore, potential water demands assocrated wrth the development of the proposed on-srte uses have been anhcrpated m recent CCWD Water Master Plans CCWD supplies the majonty water using both rurported surface water and local groundwater and these water sources aze expected to be available to meet sernce azea water demand in the future Therefore, the proposed project's water semce urrpacts aze consrdered to be less than srgmficant c. ImpaMS to Wastewater Facilities Less than Srgnificant Impact: Development of the proposed project wrll not srgnrficantly rmpact wastewater treatment facilrties Finding: Potennal impacts related to thrs rssue aze discussed in Section 4 6 of the FEIR Capacrty at Inland Emptre Utilrhes Agency wastewater treatment facilmes are adequate to process the volume of wastewater anhcrpated to ongrna[e from the proposed on-srte land uses, therefore, the proposed project's water sernce rmpacts aze consrdered to be less than srgmficant No mrhgation rs requued Facts and Analysis m Support of the Frnding: The proposed project will increase wastewater effluent flows to the Inland Emprre Uhhhes Agency's treatrnent system However, the Inland Empue Uhlrhes Agency indreates that there rs suflicrent wastewater capacity to treat the wastewater generation estunated for Vtctona Gardens While, the ultimate capacity of RPM totals 7 0 mgd, on an average day, this facility treats approxrnrately 4 4 mgd Average daily surplus capacity at RP-4 totals 2 6 mgd Development of the Vtctona Gardens project vnll result in the generation of approximately 277,200 gallons of wastewater per day The volume of wastewater generated by Ure F`~' ~4 proposed protect will amount to approrcunately 6% of the wastewater currently treated by RP-4 every day, less than . 4% of ]3P-4's ultimate daily capacity, and less than 11 % of the plant's average daily surplus capacity If bypassed to RP-I, wastewater flows would amount to less than 1% of ilus facility's current treatment load and ulhtnate daily capacity, and approxunately 6 0% of the average daily surplus capacity at RP-1 Consequently, potential impacts associated wrth increases of wastewater flows to local treatment which will occur with development of the Vrctona Gardens protect aze considered less than srgnrf~cant d. Cumulative Impacts to School Facilities Less than Srgnifcant Impart: Development of the Victoria Gardens protect wrll not have a srgnrficant crurnrlative rmpact on the provtsron of school sernces and/or facrhhes Finding: tlrrtntlahve impacts to school facilities are considered to be less than srgntficant. No mitigation rs requued Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: Development of the Vrctona Gardens project would increase the demand on schools and the school districts' education sernces in the protect vtcimty The proposed proiect would require additional staffing and facilities to accommodate the increase in the student population resulting from the development of the proposed 600 rrwlh-family residential amts However, implementation of mitigation measures identified in Section 4 6 of the FEIR would lessen the proiect's curmilahve contributions to educational sernce rrripacts Additionally, other development protects within the Ctty anll be requued to adhere to the uniform State environmental standards and evaluations set forth by the Cahforma Envvonmental Quality Act (CEQA) Therefore, the proposed protect impacts is considered to be less than significant vnth tmplernentahon of mitigation measures • e. Cumulative Impacts to Police Protection Services/Facilities Less than Significant Impact: Development of the Vrctona Gardens project will not have a significant cumulative impact on the provision of police protection semces and/or facilities Finding: Cunnilahve impacts to police protection sernces/facilthes are considered to be less than significant No mitigation is required Facts and Analysis m Support of the Finding: The Victoria Gardens protect would increase the demand of police protection in the azea However, the proposed project's irirpacts on police sernces were determined to be less than significant contingent upon the implementation of all rmhgahon measures As other development projects aze constmcted citywide and in the vicinity of the proposed project, the Ctty will be responsible for ensuring that adequate police service is provided Therefore, cumulative unpac[s associated with development of the proposed project aze considered [o be less than Stgmficant E Cumiilattve Imparts to Ftre Protection Sernces/Facihttes Less than Significant Impact: Development of the Vtctona Gardens project will not have a significant cumulative impact on the provision of fire protection semces and/or facilities Finding: Cumulative inipacts to fire protection sernces/facilities aze considered to be less than significant No mitigation is required ~~ 15 Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: Development of the proposed protect would increase the demand for fire protection in the area and would require addmonal staffing and facilmes to accommodate growth The FEIR identifies mitigation measures, the implementation of which will reduce potential unpacts to fire protection services/facilities to a less than significant level Therefore, the cumulative effect development of the proposed protect will have on fue protection servtces/facilities will be less than significant g. Cumulative Impacts to Water Supply Facilities Less than Significant Impart: When considered with other proposed or planned development witlun the servce area of the Cucamonga County Water Dtstnct, development of the Victona Gazdens protect will not contnbute to a significant water servce utipact Finding: The proposed project's contnbuhons to potential cumulative water service uripacts are considered to be less than significant No mitigation u requued Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The proposed development will increase water sernce demand to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by approxunately 732 20 acre feet per year (654,000 gallons per day) The increased water demand associated with this proposed project is an increase of less than 2% of the current average total of water supplied by the Distnct CCWD supplies the majonty water using both uriported surface water and local goundwater and these water sources aze expected to be available to meet sernce area water demand in the future Development projects within the Ctty will be subjected to all applicable environmental standards and evaluation set forth by the CEQA addressing project specific water service impacts In addition, CCWD has anticipated increases in water demand and associated infrastmcture in iu water facilities and supply planning efforts h. Cumulative Impacts to Wastewater Treatment Facilities Less than Significant Impact: When considered with other developments within the service area of the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, development of the Vtctona Gazdens project will not have a significant cuiruilahve uitpact on wastewater treatment facilities Fmdmg: The proposed project's contributions to potential cumulative wastewater service impacts are considered to be less than significant No rmhgahon is requved Facts and Analysis in Support of the Fording: The increase in wastewater generation associated with the construction of Victona Gardens will elevate the demand for wastewater servses from the Inland Empre Uhhhes Agency Existing wastewater treatment facdfies can accommodate the projected wastewater generated by the proposed project in combination with all other projects within the City Existing and planned wastewater facilthes aze expected to be available to meet cttywide wastewater generation in the future Both RPl and RP-4 have adequate daily surplus capacity to accept wastewater flows generated from the proposed on-site uses, therefore, potential cumulative wastewater service nitpacts are considered to be less than significant B. POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS WHICH CAN BE MITIGATED BELOW A LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES. The following unpacts related to Transportation and Circulation, Noise, and Public Sernces were found to be potentially significant, but, unless othervnse noted below, can be feasibly mitigated to a less than significant level with the miposmon of nutigahon measures The Ctty finds that, except as stated to the contrary, all potentially significant Project impacts fisted below can and will be mitigated, reduced or avoided by miposihon of the mitigation measures, and these mitigation measures are set forth in the Mitigation Momtonng and Reporting Program Plan adopted by the City ~Bb ~6 Specific findings of the Ctty for each category of such impacts are sM forth m detail below Public Resources Code Section 21081 states that no public agency shall approve or cazry out a project for which an Envnonmental Impact Report has been completed which identifies one or more significant effects unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findugs Changes or alterations have been requued in, or incorporated into, the proleM which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and lunsdiction of another public agency and have beeq or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified m the FEIR The Ciry hereby fords, pur;uaM to Section 21081 that, except as otherwise stated in these Ftnduigs, the followuig potential envuomnental impacts can and will be rmhgated to below a level of significance Each mitigation measure discussed in this section of the findings is assigned an alpha-numenc designation correlating rt with the envuoffi[ental category used m the Mitigation Momtonng Program included in the FEIR, and adopted by the Ciry to provide for the enforcement of such mitigation measines 1. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION e. Year 2007 with ProjeM Intersection Conditions Potential Significant Impact: Impart 4.1.1. Ten intersections are forecast to operate below the LOS threshold (C for intersections entirely within Fontana, D for others) under yeaz 2007 with project conditions inthe a mand/or p m peak hour These intersections are as follows Day Creek Boulevazd/SR-210 Westbound Ramps Day Creek BoulevazdNictona Gazdens Lane Day Creek Boulevazd/Footlull Boulevard Victona Gardens LaneBase Lme Road Vrctona Gazdens Lane/Church Street Ehwanda Avenue/Arrow Route Ehwanda Avenue/Slower Avenue I-15 Southbound RampsBase Lme Road I-15 Nordibound RampsBase Lme Road Cheny Avenue/Foothill Boulevard The project creates or contnbutes to these unsatisfactory conditions, which is considered to be a significant ur>pact except to the extent iningated below Finding: The impact is analyzed in Section 4 ] of the FEIR The FEIR analysis identified several mitigation measures to reduce potential [iripacts associated with this issue to a less than significant level The City is adopting all of the traffic and circulation mitigation measures recommended in the FEIR, with the exception of those rejected measured discussed m Section IV C below in these Fmdmgs r n\ 17 . Except as discussed in Section IV C below, unposmon of the following mitigation measure will reduce these mipacis to a level of insignificance 4.1.1A Except where noted below that full funding for the nriprovement has been assured by the Ciry or by the existing Commumty Facilities District (CFD) 2001-1, the protect shall make a fair shaze conmbuhon, through payment of traffic fees pursuant to the Development Agreement, to the following improvements Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane - Addition of a free northbound right loin lane Short eastbound green phase will necessitate pro}nbihon of pedesman crossing of Day Creek Boulevazd on the south leg of this intersection. Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - Addition of a free westbound right tom lane, which will continue to become the free northbound right tom lane at Day Creek Boulevazd/Victona Gazdens Lane Conversion of one northbound left tom lane to a northbound through lane Addrnon of a free northbound right tom lane, which will continue to become a dedicated right tom lane at I-15 Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevazd Addition of a third southbound left tom lane Conversion of southbound shazed though/nght tour lane to a dedicated southbound right tom lane Modification of signal phasing to provide right loin overlap phasing for southbound right tom movement As an alternative to the overlap phasing, a free (uncontrolled) right tom for this movement would iniprove overall intersection operations slightly and perinit eastbound U-toms, although a LOS calculation will show greater average delay for controlled movements This signal will need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to tom left Coordutahon of signal timing with Day Creek BoulevazdNtctona Gazdens Lane shall be implemented to provde maxunum use of southbound green time Signal timing must consider pedestrian crossing of the east leg of the intersection in order to connect a pedestrian had from north to south Short northbound through green phase will require • pedestrians crossing Foothill Boulevard on the east leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedestrian signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the east leg of the intersection Victoria Gardens Lane/Base Line Road -Conversion of planned northbound shared through/nght tom lane to a free right tom lane Addition of a dedication eastbound right tom lane Funding and completion of this improvement has been assured by the existing CFD 2001-1 at no cost to the protect Victoria Gardens LanelChurch Street -Modification of signal phasing to provide right tom overlap phasing for northbound right tom movement Funding and completion ojthrs improvement has been assured by the exisung CFD 1001-1 at no cost to the protect I-15 Southbound and Northbound Ramps/Base Lme Road -Freeway interchange must be reconshucted to include southbound and northbound loop on-ramps Plans for the reconshvchon of this interchange aze cunenhy being prepazed by Caltrans, SANBAG, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga The reconstruction of this interchange will include the reconstruction of the intersection of East Avenue and Base Lme Road The Crty has commrtred to perform these improvements at no cost to fhe protect Cherry Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a second southbound left tom lane This mitigation will maintain the level of sernce at this intersection a[ its 2001 level, which did not meet the Ctty of Fontana's LOS C standazd Facts and Analysis in Support of the Fmdmg: The Congestion Management Program (CMP) standazd level of service (LOS) is LOSE However, the CMP also allows local discretion and requirements to be used to detemiuie protect nripacts and appropriate mitigation In the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, LOS D is the standazd level of sernce Therefore, any level of service condition in excess of LOS D is considered an impact requiring rmtigahon Since tlvs analysis is also being used for CEQA cleazance in [he City of Rancho Cucamonga, local discretion and requirements aze used to detenrune protect irr~acts on local roadways and, hence, appropriate mitigation The protect will add traffic to roadways in the cures of Fontana and Ontario and in unincorporated San Bemazdmo County In the City of Fontana and the County, LOS C is the standazd for intersection level of sernce, in the City of Ontano, LOS D is the standazd F~2 >8 As stated in Table 4 1 J of the FEIR, levels of sernce at the above referenced intersections exceed the level of sernce standazd established by the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga and/or neighboring tunsdichons With the iniplementation of the recommended intersection improvements outlined in the above stated nntigation measures, m,n,rtn,m level of sernce standazds aze maintained at these intersections (refer to Table 4 1 K of the FEIR), therefore, mipacts related to the intersections listed above will be reduced to a less than s~gnrficant level except as othermse noted in Section N C below b. Year 2020 mth Protect Intersection Conditions Potential Significant Impact: Impact 4.13. Twenty-eight intersections aze forecast to operate below the LOS threshold (C for intersections entirely within Fontana, D for others) under yeaz 2020 mth protect conditions in the a m and /or p m peak hour These intersections are as follows Archibald Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Haven AvenueBase Line Road Mrlhken Avenue/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps Milliken AvenueBase Line Road Milliken Avenue/Foothrll Boulevazd M~lhken Avenue/Arrow Route Milliken Avenue/4th Street Rochester Avenue/Anow Route I-15 Southbound Ramps/4th Street • Day Creek Boulevazd/Summtt Avenue Day Creek Boulevazd/SR-210 Westbound Ramps Day Creek Boulevazd/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps Day Creek Boulevazd/Hrghland Avenue Day Creek BoulevazdBase Line Road Day Creek BoulevazdN~ctona Gardens Lane Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard I-15 Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevazd Vrctona Gardens LaneBase Lme Road Vrctona Gazdens Lane/Church Street Ehwanda Avenue/Church Street Etiwanda Avenue/Footlull Boulevazd Ehwanda Avenue/Arrow Route Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue I-15 Southbound RampsBase Lme Road East AvenueBase Lme Road I-15 Northbound RampsBase Lme Road • Cherry Avenue/Footh~ll Boulevard F~3 19 The protect creates or contributes to these unsatisfactory conditions, which is considered to be a significant unpact except to the extent mitigated below Finding: This mipact a analyzed in Section 4 1 of the FEIR The FEIR analyse identified several mitigation measures to reduce potential unpacts associated with the esue to a less than significant level The City is adopting all of the traffic and cuculahon mitigation measures recommended in the FE1R, with the exception of those rejected measured discussed in Section N C below in these Fmdmgs Except as discussed m Section N C below, uriposition of the following iingahon measure will reduce these unpacts to a level of insignificance 4.13A Except where noted below that full funding for the improvement has been assured by the City or by the existing Community Facilmes Detract (CFD) 2001-1, the protect shall make a fau share contribution, through payment of traffic fees as provided in the protect Development Agreement, to the following unprovements Day Creek BoulevardBase Line Road -Addition of a second eastbound left tum lane and a second westbound left tum lane Funding and completion of this unprovement has been assured by the existing CFD 2001-1 at no cost to the protect Day Creek Boulevard/Victoria Gardens Lane -Addition of a free northbound right tum lane Short eastbound green phase will necessitate prohibition of pedestrian crossing of Day Creek Boulevazd on the south leg of the intersection Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard -Addmon of a free westbound right tum lane, which will continue to become the free northbound right turn lane at Day Creek BoulevazdNictona Gazdens Lane Conversion of one northbound left tum lane to a northbound through lane Addmon of a free northbound right tum lane, which will continue to become a dedicated right tum lane at I-15 Southbound Ramps/Footlull Boulevazd Addition of a thud southbound left turn lane Conversion of southbound shazed thougli/nght tum lane to a dedicated southbound right tum lane Modification of signal phasing to provide right tum overlap phasing for southbound right tum movement As an altemahve to the overlap phasing, a free (uncontrolled) right tum for the movement would urgirove overall intersection operations slightly and permit eastbound U-turns, although a LOS calculation will show greater average delay for controlled movements The sigoal will need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to tum left Short westbound through green phase will requue pedestrians crossing Day Creek Boulevazd on the north leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedestrian signal and an eight-foot wide nosed median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the north leg of the intersection Southbound left tum lanes must be side-by-side with the northbound left turn lane at Vrctona Gardens Lane to provide sufficient queuing capacity for southbound left tum movements (See Figure 4 1 15 in the E1R) Coorduuthon of signal tuning wrth Day Creek BoulevazdNictona Gazdens Lane shall be utiplemented to provide maximum use of southbound green tune Signal tuning must consider pedestrian crossing of the east leg of the intersection in order to connect a pedestrian trail from north to south Short northbound through green phase will requue pedestrians crossing Foothill Boulevazd on the east leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedestrian signal and aneight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the east leg of the intersection I-15 Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard - Addition of a free eastbound right tum lane Victoria Gardens Lane/Base Line Road -Conversion of planned northbound shazed tluough/nght tum lane to a free right tum lane Funding and completion of this unprovement has been assured by the existing CFD 2001-1 at no cost to the protect Victoria Gardens Lane/Church Street -Addition of a second westbound left tum lane Modification of signal phasing to provide right tum overlap phasing for northbound right tum movement Funding and completion of these improvements lee been assured by the ewsting CFD 2001-1 at no cost to the project Ehwanda Avenue/Church Street -Addition of a dedcated northbound left turn lane, resulting in a single left tum lane and a single shared througli/nght ruin lane Addition of a dedicated eastbound left tum lane, resulting F~~ 20 in a single left ruin lane and a single shazed through/nght ruin lane Addition of a dedicated westbound left ruin lane, resulting in a single left ruin lane and a single shazed through/nght ruin lane Funding and completion of these uttprovemenu has been assured by the existing CFD 2001-1 at no cost to the protect Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue - Addition of a thud and a fourth northbound through lane, a second eastbound left ruin lane, a second southbound left ruin lane, a second westbound left ruin lane, and a free westbound nght turn lane These mthgahons will maintain the level of service at this intersection at its 2001 level, which did not meet the Ctty of Ontano's LOS D standazd I-15 Southbound and Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road -Freeway interchange must be reconstructed to include southbound and northbound loop on-ramps Plans for the reconstruction of this interchange are currently being prepazed by Caltrans, SANBAG, and Ute Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga The reconstruction of this interchange will include the reconstmchon of the intersection of East Avenue and Base Line Road The Crty has committed to perform these ittgirovements at no cost to the protect Cherry Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a second eastbound left ruin lane, a dedicated eastbound nght ruin lane, a second southbound left turn lane, a dedicated northbound nght ruin lane, and a dedicated westbound nght ruin lane These mitigations will maintain the level of semce at tlns intersection at its 2001 level, which did not meet the Crty of Fontana's LOS C standazd. Facts and Analysts in Support of the Finding: The level of semce for the impacted intersections (Year 2020 with protect conditions) is detailed in Table 4 1 N of the FEIR Wtth the implementation of the recommended intersection uriprovements outlined in the above stated mitigation measure, nunimum level of semce standazds are maintained at these intersections (refer to Table 4.1 O of the FE1R), therefore, impacts related to this issue will be reduced to a less than significant level, except as otherwise noted in Section IV C below 2. NOLSE a. Construction Actinties Potential Significant Impact: Impact 4.2.1. Noise levels from grading and other constmchon achviaes for the proposed protect may range up to 85 dBA L~ at the closest plammed residential uses to the north of the protect site for very tainted times when construction occurs neaz them Constmchon noise ingiacts of the proposed protect would be potentially adverse Therefore, mitigation measures would be required Finding: Tlns itrpact is analyzed in Secnon 4 2 of the FEIR. The Ctty is imposing the following mitigation measwe that will reduce potential uripacts associated with this issue to a less than signtfrcant level 4.2.1A Consfiichon shall be limited to the hours of 6 30 a m through 8 00 p m on Monday through Saturday, excluding national holidays No constmchon shall be allowed on Sundays 4.2.1B There shall be proper n¢tftling of and maintenance of all internal combustion engines for constmchon egwpment and velncles used on the site 4.2.1 C All stationary noise generating sources, such as air compressors and portable power generators, shall be located as faz away as possible from existing sensmve receptors Facts and Analysts in Support of the Findings: Constmchon of the proposed protect is expected to require Uie use of earthmovers, bulldozers, scrapers, graders, backfillers, front loaders, and water and pickup Typical operating cycles for these types of construction eginpment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings F`~S 2~ in a single left loin lane and a single shazed through/nght loin lane Addmon of a dedicated westbound left loin lane, resulting in a single left loin lane and a single shared through/nght loin lane Funding and completion of these urtprovements has been assured by the ex~shng CFD 2001-1 at no cost to the protect Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue - Addthon of a thud and a fourth northbound through lane, a second eastbound left loin lane, a second southbound left loin lane, a second westbound left loin lane, and a free westbound right loin lane These m~hgahons will maintain the level of sernce at this intersection at its 2001 level, which did not meet the Ctty of Ontario's LOS D standard I-15 Southbound and Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road -Freeway interchange must be reconstructed to include southbound and northbound loop on-ramps Plans for the reconstruction of this interchange are currently being prepazed by Caltrans, SANBAG, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga The reconstmchon of dus interchange wtll mclude the reconstruction of the mtersechon of East Avenue and Base Lme Road The Ctty has comautted to perform these mrprovemeats at no cost to the protect Cherry Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - Add~hon of a second eastbound left loin lane, a dedicated eastbound right loin lane, a second southbound left loin lane, a dedicated northbound right loin lane, and a dedreated westbound right loin lane These rmhgahons will maintain the level of sernce at this mtersechon at its 2001 level, which did not meet the Crty of Fontana's LOS C standard. Facts and Analysis in Support of the Finding: The level of sernce for the urtpacted intersections (Yeaz 2020 wrth project condmons) is detailed in Table 4 1 N of the FEIR W~dr the miplementation of the recommended mtersechon unprovements outlined in the above stated rmhgahon measure, mmunum level of sernce standazds are maintained at these intersections (refer to Table 4 1 O of the FEIR), therefore, uttpacts related to dus issue will be reduced to a less than si ficant level, except as oth s coon IV C below t r,.'u4x A, E f~o'rfF/Gt- ijC.IID ~kST Pt35e< l~t~ Rr> ,.,,,.~ a. Construction Activities Potential Significant Impact: Impact 4.2.1. Noise levels from grading and other construction activities for the proposed protect may range up to 85 dBA L~ at the closest planned residential uses to the north of the protect site for very hmmted rimes when constmction occurs neaz them Construction noise inipacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse Therefore, rmtigahon measures would be required Finding: Thus mq~act >s analyzed in Section 4 2 of the FEIR The Ctty is rmposing the following rmtigahon measure that will reduce potential impacts associated with this issue to a less than srgnrficant level 4.2.1A Constmchon shall be lumted to the hours of 6 30 a m through 8 00 p m on Monday through Saturday, excluding national hohdays No constmction shall be allowed on Sundays 4.2.1B There shall be proper mrftLng of and maintenance of all internal combustion engines for construction eginprttent and vehicles used on the srte 4.2.1C All stationary none generating sources, such as ai compressors and portable power generators, shall be located as faz away as possible from exvsting sensrtive receptors Facts and Analysis in Support of the Findings: Constmchon of the proposed project is expected to require the use of earYhmovers, bulldozers, scrapers, graders, bacld'illers, front loaders, and water and ptclcup Typical opetatutg cycles for these types of constmchoa egmpment may involve one or two aunutes of full power operation followed by three to four rmnutes at lower power settings F ~S 2> Each bulldozer would also generate 88 dBA L,m„ at 50 feet The maxunum noise level generated by water and prckup tracks is approximately 86 dBA L~ at 50 feet from these vehicles Each doubling of the sound sowces with equal strength increases the norse level by 3 dBA Assuming that each piece of constmchon egmpment operates as an indrvrdual norse source, the worst case composite norse level during thus phase of constmchon would be 91 dBA Lmax at a drstance of 50 feet from an active consWChon azea As these norse sources aze point sowces, the norse decreases at a rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance The neazest resrdences aze located to the north of the protect srte on the oppostte side of Chwch Street These resrdences are approxunately 100 feet from the project boundary and may be subjected to short-term norse reaching 85 dBA Lmax intermittently generated by constmchon activities on the protect stte This level of noose rs comparable wrth vehiculaz traffic norse on Chwch Street To m,n,m~~r the unpact of the construction norse on restdences adjacent to the project azea, compliance anth the Ciry's Norse Control Ordinance would be requued Construction related norse mgracts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse, however, wrth the urrplementahon of applicable mrhgahon measwes, the urrpact would be reduced to a less than stgmficant level b. Long Term Noise Impact Potential Significant Impact: Impact 4.2.2. There vnll be a srgmficant increase in protect related traffic norse on Vrctona Gazdens Lane from Base Lme Road to south of Chwch Street In addrhon, proposed resrdenhal properties on the project stte may be exposed to potentially srgnrficant traffic norse impacts Therefore, mrhgahon measwes are requtted to enswe that the sensitive receptor locations aze not exposed to traffic norse levels exceeding the Crty's standards Finding: Thus mrpact rs analyzed in Section 4 2 of the FE1R The Crty rs urrposurg the following mrhgahon measwe that will reduce potential impacts associated with this issue to a less than srgmficant level 4.2.2A Resrdenhal amts located within 86 to 172 feet of the centerline of Day Creek Boulevard shall be egwpped with bwlding facade upgrades, such as double paned (or dual glazing) windows, and mechamcal ventilation, such as an air conditioning system 4.2.2B Resrdenhal wets located within 364 feet of the centerline of Day Creek Boulevard or within 99 feet of the centerline of Chwch Street shall be egwpped with mechamcal ventilation, such as an air conditioning system The following mitigation measwe rs required for off-srte sensrtrve uses that would expenence potentially srgmficant project related traffic norse rrrrpacts 4.2.2C Sensitive receptors located along Vrctona Gazdens Lane within the proposed Vrctona Arbors Village may require a six foot sound wall rf outdoor land uses fall within 77 feet of the roadway A form of mechamcal ventilation, such as au conditioning, will be required rf the resrdences are within 165 feet of Vrctona Gazdens Iane The following auhgahon measwe rs requued for outdoor on-srte uses winch maybe exposed to project related traffic norse 4.2.2D Outdoor plazas and dining azeas shall incorporate featwes to mask or reduce norse generated from project related traffic Spec~cally, the project design shall utilize water featwes (e g fountains), either alone, or in tandem with other norse-reducing featwes (e g , vegetative screening, structwal design), to reduce norse levels within outdoor gathering and dining azeas D~ 22 Facts and Analysis in Support of the Findings: The FHWA Highway Traffic Norse Model (FHWA-77-108) was used to evaluate the traffic related Horse conditions in the vtctmty of the prohect sue Thts model requues vanous parameters, including trafl-ic volumes, vehicle tm~c, velncle speed, and roadway geometry to compute typical egwvalent nurse levels during daytime, evemng, and mghthme hours The futwe no prohect and future with protect average daily traffic (ADT) volumes in the area were taken from the traffic report prepazed for thus prohect The resultant none levels are weighted and sutttmed over 24 how periods to determine the L~, value Lm, contours aze derived through a series of computerized rterahons to isolate the 60, 65, and 70 dBA I.d, contours for futwe traffic none levels m the azea Futwe traffic none levels aze detailed in Tables 4 2 C and 4 2 D of the FEIR Traffic Horse under futwe (2020) baseline conditions would range from moderate to high in the prohect vtctmty Protected traffic Horse along futwe Day Creek Boulevard, Base Lme Road, and Foothill Boulevazd is high, whereas protected traffic Horse along Rochester Avenue, Vtctona Gazdens Lane, Enwanda Avenue, and Chwch Street is moderate A significant increase in protect related traffic nonce would occw on Vtctona Gazdens Lane from Base Lme Road to south of Chwch Street As stated w the FEIR, tmplementahon of the above stated mitigation measwes will reduce traffic related Horse to a below Ctty standazds, thereby reducing potential impacts related to this issue to a less than significant level c. Truck Delivery and Loading/Unloading Potential Stgmficant Impact Impact 4.2.3. Norse levels from the truck delivery and loading/unloading achvmes for the proposed protect may range up to 61 dBA Lmax at the closest residential uses proposed on the protect sue Norse impacts from the track dehvery and loading/unloadmg acnnhes would be potrnhally adverse Therefore, • mtngahon measwes would be required Finding: Thus impact is analyzed m Section 4 2 of die FEIR The Ctty is urtpostng the following mitigation measwe that will reduce potential ttnpacts assoctated with this issue to a less than significant level 4Z3A On-sae restdences located wttlun 250 feet of any loading dock shall be egwpped with mechamcal ventilation, such as an au condtaoning system 4.2.3B In accordance with Ctty Code Secnon 17 10 050 of the Performance Standazds, no loading or unloading achvmes, including [ruck idling shall occw between the hows of 10 p m. to 7 a m within 250 feet of any residential development Facts and Analysis m Support o[ the Findings: The closest off--sue sensmve receptors are at a distance of approximately 300 feet from the nearest area that an on-site loading/unloading area could be located The none attenuation of loading/unloading achvthes provtded by distance divergence at 300 feet is approxttnately 16 dBA compazed to the level at 50 feet Therefore, restdences to the north of the commercial pomon of the protect sue would be exposed to loadtng/unloadmg Horse levels of 59 dBA L,,,,,, Tlus Horse level is expected to be further attenuated by the on-site buildings Thts Horse level is below the mghtttme L,,,,,, of 60 dBA (10 p m to 7 a m) from cotnrtterctal achvmes specified m Section 17 10 050 of the Performance Standazds, therefore, no nuhgahon for Horse impacts to oJj-site sensitive receptors is requued The on-sue Horse generating achvthes closest to sensmve uses would be from the loadwg/unloading achvmes assoctated with the proposed retail stores Unloading and loading achvmes of hacks include the idling of refrigerator Hocks The closest loading dock to the proposed on-sue restdences aze at a distance of approximately 250 feet Based on Horse readings from loading and unloading achvthes for other surilaz protects, a Horse level of 75 dBA L~ at 50 feet was used m this analysts The Horse attenuation of loadwg/unloadmg achvmes, provtded by distance divergence at 250 feet, is approxunately 14 dBA compazed to the level at 50 feet Therefore, restdences of the protect sue would be exposed to loadtng/unloading noise levels of 61 dBA Lme. This noise level exceeds the F ~~ 23 mghttune L,,,,,, of 60 dBA (10 p m to 7 a m) from commeraal achvthes specified m Sechon 17 10 050 of the Performance Standazds Implementation of the above stated mrhgahon measures wrll reduce potential trttpacts to proposed on-sue sensrhve receptors to a less than srgnrficant level 3. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Impacts to School Facilities Potential Stgnt[icant Impact: Impact 4.6.1. As a result of the overcrowding m the classrooms of the Ehwanda and Chaffey School Drstncta, both have urged and continue to urge the Crty not to approve development unless adequate school facrhhes aze avatable to serve the development protect Future development will generate more students for the already urtpac[ed school drstrtcu and is considered srgntficant before mrhgahon. Finding: Tlvs urrpact is analyzed m Sechon 4 6 of the FEIR The Ctty rs urtposmg the following rmhgahon measure that will reduce potential trnpacts associated with tins issue to a less than stgruficant level 4.6.IA The developer shall pay statutory school fees to the Ehwanda School Distract and Chaffey Joint Unified High School Distract subtect to the hnutahons of Government Code Sechon 65995 et seq Facts and Analysis in Support of the Findings: Students generated from the protect site, for grades K-8 would be served by schools wttlun the Ehwanda School Distract where additional capactty can be created by temporary classrooms Terra Vista Elementary School is within close proximity of the protect stte and will provide education for grades K-5 For intermediate education, Sumrmt Intermediate School is closest to the protect sue Starting with the 1996/1997 school yeaz, the State inshmted a mandate to place an emolhnent cap on all elementary schools that results m a student to teacher ratio of 20 1 for grades K-3 and a ratio of 30 1 for all other grades Due to the lack of available classroom facihhes within the Ehwanda School Distract, some schools cannot comply with this State mandate One method used to provide addmonal facihhes rs accorriphshed through requtnng school fees and or deductions The Ehwanda School Drstnct's (3/30/01) assessment fee for residential development is $2 61 per squaze foot and $0 23 per squaze foot for commercial The cost per dwelhng of providing grades K-8 facilities may vary In general, using current construction cost tnfomtahon for the distract, the total cost of new school facrhhes and related expenses for emolhnent growth is $11,619 per home As of Mazch 30, 2001, Ehwanda School Distract has a total of 8 elementary schools and 2 intermediate schools Protections indicate nine elementary and three intermediate schools aze requued to accommodate the protected 2002 student population The Chaffey Joint Umfied Htgh School Distract (CJUHSD) serves the commumhes of Montclair, Ontano and Rancho Cucamonga Approximately 20,805 smdents aze currently enrolled at the Dtstnct's six high schools and two continuation Ivgh schools The Victona Gazdens protect site is located within the attendance azea of Ehwanda Htgh School The student population at t}us school current exceeds capactty Wtthm the Distract, two new high schools, Los Osos and Colony, aze scheduled to open m September 2002 The Drstnct's adopted Boundary Plan, indicates, that upon opening of these two new high schools, the protect site vnll be located within the attendance azea of Rancho Cucamonga High School The CJUHSD collects developer fees of $010 per square foot for cornmercral/mdustnal development and $064 per square foot for restdenhal development The proposed protect would requue additional staffing and facrhhes to accommodate the proposed 600 multi-farmly residential units However, implementation of the identified imhgahon measure vnll reduce potential school related rttipacts to a less than srgmficant level b. Impacts to Police Protection Sernces/Facilities FvV 24 ffi l d l , or o ce uses , resr entia Potential Significant Impact Impact 4.6.2. Development of the proposed commercra may increase the demand for police services Addrhonal police personal, facilrhes and/or eginpment will be required to sernce any increased demand for police servces associated with development of the Vtctona Gazdens protect This impact u potentially significant Finding: Thus urrpact >s analyzed in Section 4 6 of the FEIR The Crty rs nnposmg the following mitigation measures that will reduce potential rmpacu associated with this issue to a less than significant level 4.6.2A The developer shall subnut to the Crty a Public Safety and Secunty Plan, which Identifies the developer's intent to pronde safety servces to the protect to supplement nomlal Crty Police Sernces 4.61B To address the increased demand on Clty police servces resulting from the proposed protect, an area wlthin the retail center will be set aslde for an on-stte Ctty police office Facts and Analyses in Support of the Findings: The constmchon and occupation of new residential and commerclal uses may provide targets for crulunal activlty, therefore, the proposed protect will contnbute to an incremental increase in demand on police services and facdrhes Development of the proposed commercial, office and residential uses may increase the potential for crones against persons and property, therefore, addlhonal police protection will be requued Dunng construction of the proposed land uses, comes of grand theft and malicious mrschlef will be the tna~or crlnle problem After constmchon and occupancy of the proposed Vlctona gazdens protect, an increased potential for comes against property (theft, robbery, and burglary) will become the pnmary contain of local police The expansion of ponce protection sernces and facilities Is routinely associated with commercial growth Addlhonally, development of the proposed Vrctona Gardens protect will requue adequate emergency access into the protect sue Potential inrpacu to existing police protection sernces and facilities resulting from development of the V Ictona Gazdens project will be adequately mitigated through adherence to the above stated mlhgahon measures c. Impacts to Fire Protection Sernces/Facilities Potential Significant Impact Impact 4.63. Constmchon of the proposed protect will increase the demand on current Flre Dlstnct forces and available resources Therefore, additional fire protection services will be required Impacts reselling from Vrctona Gazdens, on the Ctty of Rancho Cucaznonga Fue Drstnct's fire sernces aze therefore, potentially slgnrficant Finding: Tins mrpact Is analyzed m Section 4 6 of the FEIR The Crry rs imposing the following mitigation measures to reduce potential Impacts associated with this issue to a less than slgnrficant level 4.63A The developer shalllom Community Facilmes Drstnct (CFD) SS-1 to provide fire protection sernces to the site 4.63B The developer shall install Cull, automatic foe spnnklers systems in all commercraUretail, office, crvrc and multi-family residential amts in accordance wish Rancho Cucamonga Fue Drstnct Ordinance No 15 and Rancho Cucamonga Fue Drstnct Ordinance No 22 4.63C The Fae Drstnct shall be consulted on street name assignments to assure cotr~hance with response plans Facts and Analysis in Support oC the Findings: The proposed protect includes approxunately 2 45 million squaze feet of commercra]/retail, office, and crvrc uses and up to 600 multi-farmly residential amts Development of the proposed land uses would potentially increase the demand for fire protection sernces F~~ 25 The protect stte rs located wtthtn the area served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Drstnct Ftre Station 3, located on Base Lme Road, approxunately 1,000 feet east of Day Creek Boulevard, would serve the protect sue Addthonally, Ftre Station 4 (located on Jersey Boulevard, approxunately 3 miles west of the "future" Day Creek Boulevard), and Fire Station 5, located on Banyan Stree; approximately 2 5 rmiles west of the "future" Day Creek Boulevard would also assist in provision of fire/emergency services An impact to fire protecnon is considered stgmficant tf rt creates a demand for fire protecnon sernces that results in response tortes in excess of five (5) minutes for fire and emergency medical calls to the protect site azea With rtr~lementahon of the proposed mthgauon measures, all potential stgmficant effects on fire services associated with the Vtctona Gazdens protect would be reduced to below the level of stgmficance C. IMPACTS ANALYZED IN THE FEIR AND DETERMINED TO BE SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOH)ABLE. Based upon information in the FEIR, in the record, and based upon testimony provided during the public hearings on thus protect the following adverse uttpacts of the Vtctona Gazdens protect as more particularly discussed below are considered to be significant and unavoidable, both individually and curmilahvely Traffic and Cuculanon, and Atr Quality Despite itttplementanon of the adopted mitigation rr~asures that will reduce uttpacts to the extent feastble, these impacts aze considered significant and unavoidable despde the adopted mitigation. 1. Traffic and Circulation a. Year 2007 Freeway Segment Conditions Stgni[icant Unavoidable Impact: Impact 4.1.2. Three freeway segments aze forecast to operate below the LOS E threshold under yeaz 2007 with protect conditions in the a m and /or p m peak hour These segments aze as follows Interstate 15 NotYhbound from Jumpa Street to I-]0 Interstate 10 Eastbound from Archbald Avenue to I-15 Interstate 10 Eastbound from Ehwanda Avenue to Cherry Avenue The protect creates or contributes to these unsatisfactory coadtaons, which is considered to be a stgmficant impact Fording: This urtpact is analyzed in Section 4 1 of the FEIR The FEIR analysts identified the following mtdgahon measures that would maintain freeway operations under yeaz 2007 with protect at acceptable levels of service These measures aze infeasible, and mll not be imposed by the Ctty 4.1.2A As shown in Table 4 1 M in the FEIR, the addmon of the following freeway lanes would maintain freeway operations under yeaz 2007 with protect conditions at acceptable levels of service Interstate 15 from Jurupa Street to I-10 -Addtuon of one northbound HOV lane Interstate 10 from Archibald Avenue to I-15 -Addtuon of one eastbound rmxed-flow lane Interstate 10 from Etiwanda Avenue to Valley Boulevard - Addtuon of one eastbound HOV lane Interstate 10 from Valley Boulevard to Cherry Avenue - Addition of one eastbound mixed flow lane and ane eastbound HOV lane There aze no feastble mitigation measures for these impacts Since there aze no feastble mrhgauon measures for these conditions, impacts remain significant and unavoidable Flo 26 Facts and Analysis in Support of the Findings: As detailed in Table 4 1 L of the FEIR, all the freeway segments • examined, with the exception of those identified above, aze forecasted to operate at satisfactory levels of sernce (LOS E or better) under 2007 with protect conditions Improvements to I-10 and I-15 aze under the authonty of Caltrans As shown on Table S-3 of the SEIR, the cost of malang the recommended I-15 and I-]0 utiproverrients would be approximately $7,800,000 Requiring the developer to pay any pomon of this cost, however, would render the protect financiafly infeasible for development A pro-foima economic protection of development costs and estunated economic retiuns for the protect has been submitted by the developer and independently renewed by the City's economic consultant The pro-forma shows that the developer's anhapated "cash on cost" return is shghfly less that the 12% return or "hurdle rate" ordinarily needed to induce a developer to move forwazd with a protect of this type and scope Accordingly, any additional cost, contnbuhon or exaction beyond die amounu budgeted in the proforxna would make the protect an undesirable investment, and it would not be developed The freeway segment mitigation descnbed above u not within the pro-forma budget Consequently, the above stated iningahon measures are not feasible, and will not be imposed b. Year 2020 with Project Freeway Segment Conditions Significant Unavoidable Impact: Impact 4.1.4 Six freeway segments are forecast to operate below the LOS E threshold under yeaz 2020 vnth protect conditions inthe a wand./or p m peak hour These segments are as follows Interstate 15 Northbound from SR-60 to Duncan Canyon Road Interstate 10 Eastbound from Vmeyazd Avenue to I-15 Interstate 10 Eastbound from Ehwanda Avenue to Cherry Avenue Interstate ]0 Westbound from I-15 to Milhken Avenue State Route 210 Eastbound from Camehan Sheet Day Creek Boulevad State Route 210 Eastbound from Cherry Avenue to East Avenue The protect creates or conmbutes to these unsatisfactory conditions, which is considered to be a significant impact Finding: This impact is analyzed in Section 4 1 of the FEIIL The FEIR analysis identified the following mitigation measures that would maintain freeway operations under yeaz 2020 vnth protect at acceptable levels of sernce These measures aze infeasible, and wdl not be ut>posed by the City 4.1.4A As shown in Table 4 1 Q in the FEIR, the addition of the following freeway lanes would maintain freeway operations under yeaz 2020 with protect conditions at acceptable levels of sernce Interstate 15 from SR-60 to Duncan Canyon Road - Addition of one northbound mixed-flow lane and one northbound HOV lane Interstate 10 from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue - Addition of one eastbound mixed-flow lane Interstate 10 from Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue - Addition of two eastbound rnixed-flow lanes Interstate 10 from Milliken Avenue to I-15 - Addition of two eastbound mixed-flow lanes and one westbound mixed-flow lane Interstate 10 from Etiwanda Avenue to Cherry Avenue - Addition of two eastbound muted-flow lanes and one eastbound HOV lane State Route 210 from Carnelian Street to Day Creek Boulevard -Addition of one eastbound mixed-flow lane . State Route 210 from Cherry Avenue to East Avenue -Addition of one eastbound mixed-flow lane ~- 1\ 27 There aze no feasible tmhgahon measures for these uiipacts Since there aze no feasible rmhgahon measures for these conditions, uripacts to these freeway segments remain sigmficant and unavoidable Facts m Support of the Finding: As detailed in Table 4 1 P of the FEIIt, all the freeway segments examined, vnth the exception of those identified above, are forecasted to operate at satisfactory levels of service under 2020 vnth protect conditions Improvements to I-10 and I-15 aze under the auilionty of Caltrans As shown on Table S-5 of the SEIlt, the cost of malang the recommended SR 210, I-15 and I-10 unprovements would be approxunately $51,480,000, of which $2,117,188 is the project's "fau shaze" Requiring the developer to pay any portion of this cost, however, would render the project financially infeasible for development A pro-forina economic projection of development costs and estunated econormc returns for the project has been submined by the developer and independenily reviewed by the City's econormc consultant The pro-forma shows that [he developer's anticipated "cash on cost" return is shgh[ly less that the 12% return or "h urdle rate" ordinarily needed to induce a developer to move forward with a project of this type and scope. Accordingly, any addmonal cost, contribution or exaction beyond the amounts budgeted in the profonna would make the project an undesirable investment, and n would not be developed The freeway segment mitigation described above is not within the pro-forma budget Consequently, ttie above stated tmhgahon measures aze not feasible, and will not be imposed c. Project Intersection Conditions Signilicant Unavoidable Impact: Impact 4.1.4. Mmgahon identified m the FEIR for the following intersections will not be unposed on the project by the Ciry, thereby creating a po[ennal for unsatisfactory levels of sernce in conflict with the CMP 2007 Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps - Addition of a free southbound right turn lane Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route - Addition of a second northbound through lane Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue - Addition of a second southbound left turn lane and a free westbound right turn lane 2020 Archibald Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - Addition of a dedicated eastbound right tum lane, a dedicated northbound right turn lane, and a second southbound left turn lane Haven AvenueBase Line Road - Addmon of a thud eastbound through lane and a second eastbound left turn lane Milliken Avenue/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps -Addition of a free northbound right hun lane Mdhken AvenueBase Line Road -Addition of a thud eastbound through lane and a thud southbound through lane Mdhken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - Addmon of a thud eastbound through lane, a thud and a fourth southbound through lanes, and a dedicated northbound right turn lane Milliken Avenue/Arrow Route -Addition of a second eastbound left turn lane, a thud eastbound through lane, and a fourth northbound through lane Mdhken Avenue/4th Street -Addition of a thud southbound left turn lane Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for northbound right turn movement Rochester Avenue/Arrow Route -Conversion of second northbound left tum lane to a second northbound through lane F°IZ 2s I-15 Southbound Ramps/4th Street - Addition of a free southbound right turn lane Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for northbound right turn movement Day Creek Boulevard/Summit Avenue - Addition of dedicated northbound and southbound right fain lanes Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps - Construction of a loop off-ramp for westbound SR-210 haffic exiting south onto Day Creek Boulevazd Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps - Addition of a free northbound right fain lane Conversion of eastbound shared left tum/througlt/nght fain lane to a shazed through/nght fain lane Day Creek Boulevard/Highland Avenue - Addition of dedicated northbound and southbound right nun lanes Conversion of westbound shazed through/ngbt hun lane to a dedicated right hun lane Modification of signal phasing to provide right tam overlap phasing for westbound right turn movement. Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a second southbound through lane, a second northbound through lane, and a second northbound left fain lane Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for the northbound right fain movement Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route -Addition of a second northbound through lane, a second southbound through lane, a second eastbound through lane, a second eastbound left tam lane, a second westbound left tam lane, and a dedicated northbound right turn lane Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue - Addition of a second eastbound left tam lane East AvenueBase Line Road - Mitigation at this intersection is included as part of I-15Base Lme Road interchange reconstmchon Fording: Irigiacts at these locations are analyzed m Section 4 1 of the FEIR The FEIR analysis identified die preceding mitigation measmes that would maintain intersections under yeaz 2020 with protect at acceptable levels of service These measures are infeasible, and, m accordance with the Development Ageement for the protect, will not be unposed by the City Level of service utipacts at these locations will be significant and unavwdable Facts in Support of the Finding: As shown on Tables S-3 and S-5 of the FEIR, the cost of making these improvements would exceed three mdhon dollars, of which the project's "fau share" would be more than four hundred thousand dollars Requiring the developer to pay any poruon of [tits cost, however, would render the project futancially infeasible for development A pro-forma ewnomic projection of development costs and estimated econottuc returns for the project has been subrmtted by the developer and independently reviewed by the City's economic consultant. The pro-forma shows that the developer's anuapated "cash on cost" return is slightly less that the 12% return or "hurdle rate" ordinarily needed to induce a developer to move forwazd with a project of this type and scope Accordingly, any addmonal cost, contribution or exaction beyond the amounts budgeted in the proforma would make the project an undesirable investment, and i[ would not be developed The intersection minganon described above is not within the pro-forma budget Consequently, the above stated nutigahon measures are not feasible, and will not be unposed d. Potential Delays or Implementation of Traffic and Circulation Improvements Significant Unavoidable Impact: Impact 4.1.5. Several of the tntugahon measures for Traffic and Cuculauon unpac[s requue the payment of a "fair share" contnbuuon by the project, rather than requumg the project to pay the enure cos[ of ilie unprovemen[ or guaranty that it be installed and completed by the tune [he project opens Other measures identify the Ctty or a CFD as a funding source If the remainder of the funding from other sources is not timely obtained, or if the unprovements aze delayed for other reasons, the project may operate with additional unnu[igated traffic impacts. ~~ ~ 29 I-15 Southbound Ramps/4th Street -Addition of a free southbound nght tttm lane Modification of signal phasing to provide nght fain overlap phasing for northbound nght fain movement Day Creek Boulevard/Summit Avenue - Addition of dedicated northbound and southbound nght ttun lanes A Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps - Constmchon of a loop off-ramp for westbound SR-210 / -' 4 traffic exiting south onto Day Creek Boulevazd ~p Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps -Addthon of a free northbound nght tttm lane Conversion ff x-' f of eastbound shazed left tum/through/nght fain lane to a shazed through/nght fain lane t~f ap-'~ . Day Creek Boulevard/H~ghland Avenue -Addthon of dedicated northbound and southbound nght fain lanes !l Conversion of westbound shared through/nght fain lane to a dedicated nght tam lane Modification of srgnal phasing to provide nght ttun overlap phasing for westbound nght fain movement Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addthon of a second southbound through lane, a second northbound through lane, and a second noihbound left tam lane Modification of signal phasing to provide nght tttm overlap phasing for the northbound nght fain movement Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route -Addthon of a second northbound through lane, a second southbound through lane, a second eastbound though lane, a second eastbound left fain lane, a second westbound left tam lane, and a dedicated northbound nght fain lane Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue - Addthon of a second eastbound left tam lane !1 Eas venue/Base ine oa - Mrtigahon at tins intersection is included as part of I-15Base Line Road mterchangereconstmchon ~~/ Finding: Impacts at these locations are analyzed in Section 4.1 of the FEIR. The FEIR analysts identified the preceding mitigation measures that would maintain intersections under yeaz 2020 with protect at acceptable levels of service These measures are uifeasible, and, in accordance with the Development Agreement for the protect, will not be unposed by the Ctty Level of service unpacts at these locations will be sigiiificant and unavoidable Facts m Support or the Finding: As shown on Tables S-3 and S-5 of the FEIR, the cost of making these uitprovernents would exceed three million dollars, of which the project's "fau shaze" would be more than four hundred thousand dollars Requiring the developer [o pay any portion of [tits cost, however, would render the project finanaally infeasible for development A pro-forma economic projection of development costs and estimated econoimc returns for the project has been subnutted by the developer and independently reviewed by the City's economic consultant. The pro-forma shows that the developer's anticipated "cash on cost" return is slightly less that the 1246 retttm or "hurdle rate" ordinazily needed to induce a developer to move forwazd with a project of this type and scope. Accordingly, any additional cost, contnbuhon or exaction beyond die amounu budgeted in the proforma would make the project an undesirable investment, and rt would not be developed. The intersection mitigation descnbed above is not within the pro-forma budget. Consequently, the above stated mitigation meastres are not feasible, and will not be imposed d. Potential Delays in Implementation oP Traffic and Circulation Improvements Significant Unavoidable Impact: Impact 4.1.5. Several of the mitigation measures for Traffic and Circulation impacts require the payment of a `fazr shaze" contnbuhon by the project, rather than requiring the project to pay the entire cost of the improvement or guaranty that rt be installed and completed by the tune the project opens. Other measures identify the Ctty or a CFD as a funding source. If the remainder of the funding from other sources is not tunely obtained, or if the improvements aze delayed for other reasons, the project may operate with additional tinmitigated traffic impacts 1 ~ 29 • Finding: Impacts from the protect before rmhgahon are analyzed in Sechon 4 1 of the FEIR and will be sigmficant These unpacts could be avoided if the City required the protect to pay 100 percent of the cost of each unprovement and to assure or guaranty that the protect would not open until all required utiprovements were uistalled Such a requirement is ufeasible, and will not be uiiposed by the City Accordingly, level of service unpacts at locations where the developer is contnbuhng a "fair shaze" may be significant and unavoidable if the remainder of the funding is not available when needed or the unprovements aze otherwise delayed Facts m Support of the Finding: As shown on Tables S-3 and S-5 of the FEIR, the cost of all the offsite traffic improvements needed to fully tmhgate protect mipacts exceeds 85 aullion dollars Requiring the developer to pay any portion of this cost beyond its fair shaze for the tmtigation being unposed, however, would render the protect financially infeasible for development A pro-forma econonuc protection of development costs and estunated economic retuivs for the protect has been submitted by the developer and independently reviewed by the City's econotmc consultant The pro-forma shows [hat the developer's anticipated "cash on cost" return is slightly less that the 12% return or "hurdle rate" ordinazily needed to induce a developer to move foiwazd with a protect of this type and scope Accordingly, any addmonal cost, wntnbuhon or exaction beyond the amounts budgeted in the proforma would make the protect an undesirable investment, and rt would not be developed In addition, construction financing and leasing practices for a lazge development tike the protect will require the protect developer to commit to a an opening date for the protect, and will not allow the opening to be postponed because of delays in funding or completing offsrte traffic unprovements. Consequently, the above stated rmhganon measures aze not feasible, and will not be unposed 2. AIIt QUALITY • a. Short-term Construction Related Impacts Significant Unavoidable Impact: Impact 43.1. Peak grading and constmchon emissions would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for the cntena pollutanu of NOx and PMio, which aze 100 pounds per day and 150 pounds per day, respectively Enussions of other cntena pollutants would be below the standards Implementation of mitigation measures will m,n,m,~e au quality intpacu, however, the impacts will remain significant Finding: Issues associated with the proposed protect's effecu on au quality aze discussed in Sechon 4 3 of the FEIR The City is imposing the following nuhgahon measures that would reduce the level of construction related enssions, but not below a level of significance 43.1A The Construction Contractor shall select the constmchon egmpment used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency The Constmchon Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction egmpment mll be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 43.1B The Constmchon Contractor shall utilize electnc or diesel powered egmpment m lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible 43.1C The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egmpment when not in use Duruig smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction penod should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to m,mm,ze vehicles and equipment operating at the same tune 43.1D The Construction Contractor shall tune the constmchon achviaes so as not to interfere with peak hour traffic and m,n,m,~e obswchon of through traffic lanes adtacent to the site, if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adtacent to existing roadways 1 1 30 43.1E The Constmchon Contractor shall support and encourage ndeshanng and ttaosrt incentives for the , constmchon crew 43.1F Dust generated by the development achvrhes shall be retained on srte and kept to a mrnrmum by following the dust control measures fisted below a During clearing, grading, earth movtg, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill matenaLs, water trucks or sprurkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the srte and to create a crust after each day's activthes cease b During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all aeeas of vehrcle movement darrrp enough to prevent dust from leaving the srte At a minunum, this would include wetting down such areas in the late mowing and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour c After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated unmedrately by prckup of the soil until the azea rs paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur d Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept worst, or treated mth soII binders to prevent dust generation e Tmcks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials, and/or constmction debris to or from the srte shall be Carped from the point of ongta 43.1G The Constmction Contractor shall utilize as much as possrble precoated/natural colored bwlding materials, water based or low VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray egwpment wrth hrgh transfer effictency, such as a high volume low presswe (HVL,P) spray method, or manual coatings apphcahon such as paint brash, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge Desprte ur>plementahon of the stated nrrhgahon, short-term construction emtssrons would exceed the SCAQMD's daily thresholds for the criteria pollutants of NOx and PMro Therefore, rrrrpacts assocrated mth this tssue would remain stgmficant and unavordable Facts m Support o[ the Frndmg: Grading and construction achnties would cause combustion ermssrons from uhlrty engines, heavy-duty constmchon vehrcles, haul trucks, and vehrcles transporting the construction crew Exhaust emtsstons during grading and constmchon achvrhes envrsroned on srte would vary daily as construction achvt[y levels change It is assumed that constmchon or building erection would not begin until after mass grading on the protect srte is completed Therefore, there would be no overlap in emrssrons from grading or building erechon/construchon Construction emtssrons assocrated wrth grading of the proposed protect have been estunated based on the methodology outlined in the SCAQMD CEQA Arr Quakty Handbook and on analysts of srmrlaz protects Fugitive dust ermssrons aze generally assocrated with demohhon, land clearing, exposwe, vehicle, and egwpment travel on unpaved roads and with cut and fill operations Dust generated during constmchon achvrhes would vary substantially depending on the level of activity, the specrfic operations, and weather condthons Nearby sensmve receptors and workers may be exposed to blowing dust, depending upon prevailing wind condmons Asswmng that a tainted amount of debris will be mrported or exported from the protect srte, exhaust emrssrons from haul tracks and dust from soil transfer aze expected to be rrnmmal The SCAQMD estunates that each acre of graded surface creates about 26 4 pounds of PMro per workday during the • construction phase of the protect and 21 8 pounds of PMro per how from drrUdebns pushing per dozer Because the protect azea covers 174 acres, rt is not expected that the entrre protect srte would be graded at the same tune Therefore, rt rs assumed that a maximum of ten acres of land would be under mass grading on any one day It is also F IJ 31 assumed that two dozers would be used up to eight hours a day each A maximum of one acre of open stockpiles would occur on the protect site, which will generate 85 6 ppd of PMio Therefore, a total of 698 pounds of PMio per day would be generated from soil disturbance without mitigation duniig peak construction phase This level of dust emission would exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 150 pounds per day T'he protect will be required to corriply with regional rules, w}uch would assist in reducing the short-term air pollutant emissions SCAQMD Rule 403 requues that fugmve dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nmsance off site Implementation of these dust suppression techniques as required by the SCAQMD can reduce the fugmve dust generation (and thus the PMio component) by 50 to 75 percent Assuming a mitigating efficiency of 50 percent by implementation of the standard mitigation, dally PMio ermssions from soil disturbance would be reduced to approximately 349 pounds Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on neazby sensitive receptors However, fugitive dust irrgiacts would remain adverse Mitigation measures would be required It is assumed further that, on a peak grading day, a total of 24 workers would be working on the protect srte Assuming an average 50 mile round hip commute length for every worker, emissions from the daily 1,200 rniles of Navel by worker commute would generate 10 3 pounds per day (ppd) of CO, 1 9 ppd of ROC, 3 3 ppd of NOx , 0 6 ppd of SOx ,and 1 2 ppd of PMio As shown, peak grading day constmchon egmpment emissions would exceed [he SCAQMD daily thresholds for the cntena pollutants NOx and PMio Because short-terrri constmchon ermssions would exceed the SCAQMD daily threshold for NO, and PMio> even after implementation of the above stated inihgahon, this impact remains significant b. Air Pollutants with Regional Impacts Significant Unavoidable Impact: Impact 43.2. Long-term au pollutant erssion impacts aze those associated with changes in permanent usage of the protect site Area sources include on-site emissions such as natural gas consumption and emissions associated with consumer products Mobile source erssions result from vehicle tops associated with the proposed protect These impacts would be potentially significant Finding: Issues associated with the proposed project's effects on au quality aze discussed in Section 4 3 of the FE1R The City is imposing the following rtuhgahon measures that will reduce regional air quality impacts, but not below a level of significance 43.2A The project shall comply with Title 24 of the Cahfomia Code of Regulations or City requirements regazding energy conservation standazds 43.2B Use of transportation demand measures (TDM), such as preferential pazking for vanpoolmg/carpooling, subsidy for transit pass or vanpooling/carpooling, flextime work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and on-sne cafeteria, shall be incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses 43.2C Prewire houses for electrical charging EV cars, if feasible Install condmts for fiber optics for residential and non-residential uses 43.2D Install EV chazgers or alternative fuel stations (natural gas) for community wide use at key commercial and public location(s), if feasible 43.2E The developer shall conhact with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance with and implementation of the mitigation monitoring progrun. F~~ 32 Total emrssrons from long-term protect operations would include stationary sources added to the mobile sources The emtssroas for CO, NOx, ROC, and PM~o would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for daily operations eanssrons No feasrble mthgahon measures are available to reduce long-term au quality ermsstons from protect related vehrcles to a less than srgmficant level Transportation demand management (TDM) measures and the other measures rmposed as descnbed above aze effective in reducing mobile source emtssrons, but cannot feasibly reduce mtpacts below a level of srgmficance, pamcularly with a retarl-based development m a suburban setting. Therefore, the protect would have a srgmficant urtpact on au quality after auagahon Facts in Support of the Finding: Proposed oo-srte uses mclude approxrmately 2 45 million square feet of retail, office, and crvrc uses, as well as up to 600 multiple family resrdenaal amts on 174 acres of land These land uses would consume nature] gas and electnaty While the consumption of electnctty and natural gas by the proposed on- srte land uses would not in rtself exceed the emtssron thresholds established by the SCAQMD, when combined with mobile enusstons resulting from protect related traffic would be significant (Table 4 3 G of the FEIR) There would be 57,312 daily vehtculaz arps assocrated wrth the proposed on-site uses Based on the latest URBEMIS7G au qualrty model, the proposed land uses would generate cntena pollutant emrssrons that would exceed the operational thresholds for CQ ROC, PM~o and NOx established by the SCAQMD No feasrble mrhgahon measures aze available to reduce long-term au quality emrsstons from protect related vehrcles to a less than significant level Therefore, the protect would have a stgnrficant mrpact on au quality after mrtigaaon c. Cumulative Air Qttabty Impacts Significant Unavoidable Impact: Development of the proposed protect will cumulatively rmpact au quality wrthin the South Coast Atr Basin, and area which is desrgnated nonattainment for ozone, PM~o, and CO Finding: Both long-term stationary (on-srte energy consumption) and mobile (veluculaz traffic) sources would contribute to regional cntena pollutant emtssrons Because the Basin ~ a nonattamment zone for ozone and CO, these eaussrons would cumulatively contribute to srgmficant regronal au qualrty rrrrpacts Tlus cumulative effect u srgmficant and unavoidable Facts rn Support of the Finding: The cumulative study area for au quality mtpacts encompasses the Basin, which rs designated nonattamment for ozone, PM10, and CO Operational emrssrons associated oath the proposed protect in conjunction with build out of the City~s General Plan will result in significant, cumulative au quality irripacts within the Basin Ermsston of NOX from construction of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to regional ozone formation Because the Basin is a nonattavunent zone for ozone, this is a significant au quality impact Emissions of cntena pollutants and fugitive dust from construction activity would result in mostly localized au quality impacts in the protect vicinity It is not anticipated that constmchon at other off-sue locations would add to the protect related localized au quality mrpacts V. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Chapter 6 0 of the FEIR includes four protect alternatives These alternative address potential nnpacts associated with I) a no-build altemaave, 2) an enclosed mall alternative, 3) a retail/cmc alternative, and 4) an increased residential alternative The City has considered these alternatives for the development of the Victoria Gardens protect and makes the following finduigs F°~~- 33 • No Build Alternative. Under this alternative, no development would take place on sue The protect sne would be retained in tts current condthon. No ground disturbing achvthes would occur, nor would any form of structure or facility be erected Finding: Under this alternative, the srgmficant trafia, au quality, and nurse tmpacts assocrated wtth the proposed Protect would not occur The protect site has been planned for "Regionally Related" conmterctal uses for over twenty years Whte Uus alteroahve would srgmficanUy reduce the traffic, au quality, Horse, and public sernce impacts assocrated with development of the proposed protect, allowing the protect sne to remain vacant and undeveloped would not realize the goals and oblechves stated in City's General Plan and the stated oblecaves of the proposed Protect Accordmgly, tins alternative u rejected as tnfeastble Enclosed Mall Alternative. Development of the "Enclosed Mall" would allow construction of an enclosed mall containing the retail, entertainment, and restaurant uses envtsroned in the proposed project's "downtown" azea (approximately 1 543 tmllron squaze feet) While occupying Ute same acreage as the proposed project, Ute intensity of residential, outlying retail, and office uses would be reduced by one-half, resulting in construction of up to 300 residential amts, 285,000 squaze feet of office uses, and t 50,000 squaze feet of outlying retail uses Additionally, the Enclosed Mall Alternative will include 40,000 squaze feet of tint uses Finding: Under the Enclosed Mall Alternative, mgracts related to biological resources, cultural resources, and the provision of public sernces would be sttnilaz to the proposed project Impacts related to publtc facilities would be proportionally reduced Traffic volumes would be reduced, Utereby, mggertng reductions in the Horse levels and operational enussrons While the total amount of developed uses envisioned under the Enclosed Mall Alternative equals 81 percent of that included m the proposed project, and will offer a vaned mix of retail, office, and residential uses, rt will not allow for the development of the "downtown" environment which rs the keystone cotr~onent of the proposed project In addition, while some impacts of the Proposed project could be reduced by scaling back the proposed Project so that rt would match Ute development densmes of the Enclosed Mall Altemahve and still provide an open au mixed-use center, the substantial reduction in residential dwelling amts, office space and ancillary retail uses would preclude Ute successful integration of a "new downtown" live-work environment that the Crty seeks to achieve on this Stte Accordingly, this altemahve rs rejected as infeasible Re[aiVCivtc Alternative. Under this altemahve, the 174-acre project site would be developed with retail and curt uses only Using a Floor Area Ratio of 0 25, a maximum of 1,851,300 squaze feet of retail uses would be pemutted within the lumts of the proposed project site Additionally, 40,000 squaze feet of civic uses would be developed on 4 acres within the lunits of the project site Rather than being developed under a Master Plan, development would occur in a more piecemeal fashion Fording: The RetarUCrvrc Altemahve would result in the development of approximately 1,851,300 squaze feet (or approximately 77 percent of that of the proposed project) of retail uses on the 170 0 acre project site and 40,000 square feet of civic uses on 4 0 acres Implementation of Uns altemahve would substantially modify the project sue, resulting in the loss of on-sne vegetation, and replacing undeveloped land with urban uses While impacts to biological and cultural resources would be sinnlaz to those resulting from the proposed project, implementation of the RetarUCrvrc Altemahve, traffic volumes would be reduced, thereby, triggering reductions in the Horse levels and operational ermssrons Accordmgly, this altemahve rs rejected as infeasible While the development of the RetarUCrvrc Altemahve will penmt the development of 1,851,300 squaze feet of retail uses, rt rs not possible at this tune to identify the location, configuration, type or uric of uses that may occur on-sne Piecemeal development may occur While development within the project sne will continue to be governed by applicable design guidelines established and F I~ 34 enforced by the Ctty, the potential for inconsistent or incompatible development is a possibihty . under this altemahve Because the blend of retail, office, residential, and cmc uses envisioned under the proposed Protect will be Master Planned, rt will be possible to establish design guidelines and performance standazds to ensure the compatibility and consistency of the proposed Project's vaned uses Additionally, without the residential or office components missing from the Retail/Civic Alternative, the opportunity to develop the "inviting" downtown environment, envisioned as an integral part of the proposed Protect, would be lost. Increased Residential Alternative. Development of the protect site under ibis altemahve would pemut the construction of up to 1,500 multiple-family residential amts on 100 acres (15 dwelling tunts/acre), 435,600 square feet of retail uses on 40 acres (FAR 0 25), 522,720 squaze feet of office uses (FAR 0 40) on 30 acres, and 40,000 squaze feet of civic uses on 4 acres. Finding: The Increased Residential Alternative would increase the number of restdenhal uses developed on the 174-acre project site Lnplementahon of this alternative would substantially modify the protect site, resulting in the loss of on-site vegetatioq and replacing vacant land with urban uses Wlule irmpacts to biological and cultuml resources would be sinulaz to those resulting from the proposed project, implementation of this alternative would result m a reduction in ADT volumes, thereby, tnggenng corresponding decreases m vehicle emissions and noise sources Implementation of this altemahve would result in significant increases m the water demand, wastewater generatioq and the student populations at local schools Development of the malonty of the project site with residential uses would preclude construction of the vaned mix of uses and the establishment of the "downtown" venue which are key components of the proposed Protect Accordingly, this alternative is rejected as infeasible • VI. PROJECT BENEFITS The project will provide [he following benefits to the Ctry, the Redevelopment Agency, and the community at lazge. 1 Estabhshnient of amasser-planned "downtown" that incorporates complementary retail/comiriercial, office, residential and tint uses 2 The Victona Gazdens Project provides a mix of cultural and regional commercial uses that gives the Crty a stable, not transitory, type of development 3 The Vtctona Gazdens Project provides a mix of residential, office and commercial uses at an intonate scale that offers lifestyle choices not generally available to residents elsewhere m the City 4 The Victona Gazdens Protect offers an unprecedented opporhinity to add a performing arts and Lbrary complex to the community 5 The Victona Gardens Protect offets exceptional econorc prominence, strengthened economic base for the City, elimination of economic "leakage" to surrounding azeas, drect and indirect stimulation of other econorc investments in the community, Lobs opportunity for workers, and overall fiscal benefits for the residents FA I 35 6 The Victona Gazdens Protect provides some major backbone uifrastructure that allow for adequate circulation, delivery of utilities, control of drainage and disposal of waste water, winch would not be made available to the commumty without the Profect's development The Vtctona Gazdens Project will meet each of the ob~echves set forth m Sections I and II B above in these Findings VII. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga adopts this Statement of Ovemding Considerations with respect to the sigmficant unavoidable impacts identified above and in the FEIIt, specifically (1) Traffic and Cuculahon related to (a) Yeaz 2007 with project conditions, (b) Yeaz 2020 with project conditions, and (2) Au Quality related to (a) short-term construction emissions, (b) long-term operational eanssions, and (c) cumulative regional air quality This section of 5ndurgs specifically addresses the requirements of Secnou 15093 of the CEQA Gindehnes, which requires the lead agency to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable significant irnpacts and to detemrine whether the impacts are acceptably ovemdden by the project benefits Calrfomra Public Resources Code 21002 provtdes "In the event specific ewnomic, sacral, and other condmons make infeasible such project altemahves or such mitigation measures, individual projects can be approved in spite of one or more srgmficant effects thereof " Section 21002 1(c) provides "If economic, sacral, or other conditions make a infeasible to mitigate one or more significant effects of on the environment of a project, die project may nonetheless be approved or Gamed out at [he drscreuon of a public agency "Finally, California Administrative Code, Tule 14, 15093(a) states "If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse enviromnental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered `acceptable The Ctty finds that the previously stated mayor project benefits (see Section VI above) of the Vtctona Gazdens project outweigh the unavoidable significant adverse environmental impacts noted above Each of the separate benefits of the proposed development cited m Section VI above is hereby detemmmed to be, in itself and independent of the other project benefits, a basis for ovemdmg all unavoidable environmental irupacts identified in the FEIR and these Findings The Cites findings set forth m the preceding sections have identified all of the adverse environmental unpacts and the feasible rmtigation measures which can reduce impacts to less than significant levels where feasible, or to the lowest feasible levels where significant impacts remain. The findings have also analyzed alternatives to determine whether there aze reasonable or feasible alternatives to the proposed action or whether they might reduce or elinnnate the significant adverse impacts of the proposed Protect. The FE1R presents evidence that ittgilemenhng the development of the Victona Gazdens project will cause signficant adverse impacts, which cannot be substantially rmtigated to nonsignificant levels These significant utrpacts have been outlined above and the City makes the following finding Fmdmg: Having considered the unavodable adverse impacts of the Victona Gazdens project, the Ciry hereby determines [ha[ all feasible rmtigation has been adopted to reduce or avoid the potentially significant inipacis identified in the FEIIt, and that no additional feasible mitigation is available to fiuther reduce significant urrpacts Further, the City finds that econormc, social, and other considerations of the Victona Gazdens project outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts descnbed above The project benefits and other reasons for accepting these remainuig unrmtigated impacts are descnbed m these Findings In malang this finding, the City has balanced the benefits of the Victona Gardens project as developed m accordance with the proposed Master Plan against its unavoidable environmental unpacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those nsks Furthermore, the Ctty has considered the alternatives to the project, and makes the following finding F 1~ 36 Finding: Altemahves to the Victona Gazdens protect that ringht have been capable of reducing identified impacts have been considered and rejected because the alternatives are not feasible and fail to provide economic and coaamimty benefits that will result from the Victona Gardens protect The Ctty fuiYher finds that the Vtctona Gazdens protect benefits aze substantial and ovemde each unavotdable trnpact of the prolec; as follows I) Ftndtngs Regarding Tratfic and Circulation Impacts The Vtctona Gazdens project's ttnp acts to intersections, streets and freeway segments remain srgmficant and unavoidable because paying for unprovemenu other than those provided by the Mmgation Momtoring Ptogram would render the Project financially infeasible. This unpact is ovemdden by the new commeroial/retail, civic, office, and housing opportunities, infrastmcture unprovements, and other benefits provided by the Vtctona Gazdens project 2) Findings Regarding Atr Quality Impacts Construction activities resulting from development of the proposed project, including mass grading, will result m short-term increases in an emissions that exceed applicable thresholds of the SCAQMD, despite the uriposition of rintigation measures Short-teem increases in air emissions from constmction can be mitigated but are not entirely avoidable, as constmction activities within this region will continue to provide necessary and vital housing Emtsston of au pollutants resulting from project-related traffic will contnbute to a significant long-term air quality These unpacis are ovemdden by the corrnriercia]/retail, civic, office, and housing opportunities, infiastmctine miprovements, and other benefits provided by the Victona Gardens project 3) Findings Regarding Cumulative Impacts The Victona Gazdens project will contirbute to cumulative air quality utipacts including short-term inipacts to an quality during construction or other major projects in the area and on a long term basis as a source of vehicle emission from the proposed project and other projecu in the region contnbuting to an increase in pollutants Since the South Coast Atr Basin u a nonattainment azea for federal air quality standards, cumulative increases are considered significant and unavoidable Thu mtpact is ovemdden by the new commercial/retail, civic, office, and housing opportunities, infrastructure improvements and other benefits provided by the Vic[ona Gardens project As the Lead Agency for the FEIR, the Crty has reviewed the project and the FEIR and fully understands the Project proposed by Forest Ctty Development Further, the City fords that all potential adverse environmental uupacts and all feasible mitigation measures to reduce these uiipacts have been identified in the FEIR and public testimony These mrpacu and rsiitigation measures aze discussed in Section N above The Ctty also fords that a reasonable range of altemahves was considered in the FEIR and this document Section V above, and that no feasible alternatives which substantially lessen project unpacts aze available for adoption The Ciry has identified economic and social benefiu and nr>piirtant public policy objectives enumerated in Section VI above, which will result from unplementing the Victona Gazdens project The Ctty has balanced these substantial social and economic benefits against the unavoidable significant adverse effects of the proposed project Given the substantial social and economic benefits that will accme to the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the region, from developing the proposed project the City finds that the benefits identified herein ovemde the unavoidable environmental effects ~'~ ` 37 • VIII. ADOPTION OF A MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE CEQA MITIGATION MEASURES Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code requires the City adopt a momtonng or reporting program regazding the changes m the protect and mitigation measures miposed to lessen or avoid significant effects on the environment. The Mitigation Momtonng and Reporting Program (MM12P), included as Appendix H in the FEIIt, is adopted as modified, because i[ fulfills the CEQA mitigation momtonng requirements a) The MMRP is designed to ensure compliance with the changes in the protect and anhgahon measures m>posed on the protect diirmg project ut>plementahon, and b) Measures to rmtigate or avoid significant effects on [he environment are fully enforceable through pernut conditions, agreements or other measures r~ r~ L J F I~Z 38 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC JANUARY 2002 APPENDIX H MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN PINAL EIR VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT TIGATION MONITORING PLAN This mrtfgahon momtonng plan has been prepared for use m ~mplementmg mrttgation measures fdenhfied m the Environmental Impact Report for the Vfctona Gardens protect This program has been prepazed in compliance with the State law to ensure compliance with mfhgahon measures adopted for the protect by the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code, Paragraph 201081 6), effective January 1, 1989, regmres adoption of a reporting or momtonng program for those cond~hons of approval placed on a protect to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment The law states that the momtonng or reporting program shall be designed to ensure compliance dunng protect implementation The momtonng program contains the following elements Cond~hons of approval that act as tmpact rmtigahon measures aze recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure compliance In some instances, one action, such as plan review, may be used to venfy ~mplementahon of several conditions of approval A procedure of compliance and venficahon has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported The program has been designed to be flexible As momtonng progresses, changes to com- pliance procedures may be necessary based on recommendations by those responsible for the program If changes are made, new momtonng compliance procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the program F3~ C \Docummts and Semngs\nfongLLocal Settings\Temporery Intemel Flles\OLK2EBU7mginon Momtonng Plen_v4 C10C (01222002) I'I-1 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC IAN OARV 3001 FINAL EIR VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT APPENDI% H -MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report -Victoria Gardens TI W .s~"+='~~~ MIN attonMeasure ~MonitoringandlLeportitig;;r, ~r~Montt6ivig~,~y~~, ~,'_„Re~ponsible~~a~r ~r,~~~„t,~ ~~,~~~;~;~ ~#;~', ~ 3N_ "='-Ptocess_` Mtles~one,;7„~ °~;r1~ ~, Initials ,Date` `Remarks Traffic 4.1.1A Except where noted below that funding for the Improvement has been assured by the Clty or by the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) 2001-1, the pro)ect shall make a fau share confibution to the following improvements (Year 2007) • Day Creek BoulevardNlctona Gardens Lane - Applicant shall participate m the Fonnahon of CFD to Clty Engineer Addition of a free northbound right loin lane new Community Facilities be completed poor to Short eastbound green phase well necessitate Dlsmc[ (CFD) that well Issuance of building prohibition of pedesnlan crossing of Day Creek construct this Improvement pennrt Boulevazd on [he south leg of this intersection • Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - Applicant shall partwipate m the Fortnahon of CFD tG City Engineer Addrtlon of a free westbound right tom lane, new Community Facilmes be completed poor which will continue to become the free Disfict (CFD) that wdl to Issuance of northbound right loin lane at Day Creek construct this Improvement budding pernut BoulevardNlctonaGardeos Lane Converson of one northbound left tom lane to a northbound through lane Addton of a free northbound right tom lane, which wdl continue to become a dedwated right tom lane at I-1 S Southbound Ramps~Foothill Boulevard Addition of a third southbound left tom lane Conversion of southbound shared though/nght tom lane to a dedwated southbound right loin lane Modification of signal phasing to provide right loin overlap phasing for southbound right loin movement As an alternative to the overlap phasing, a free (uncontrolled) right loin for this movement would Improve overall intersection operations slightly and pernut eastbound U-toms, althou h a LOS calculation wdl show eater C \Documenu and Semngs\nfongV.ocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK2EBVvtmganon Monitoring Plan_v4 DOC (OIR2/2002) H-22 LSA ASSOCIATES INC JANUARY 5001 PINAL EIR VICTORIA CARD6N5 PROJECT AP PENDI% H -MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM i fi~ ' R+I ~t`f, "~'{_ - ~~; ~ ~~ ' Monitorin and Re g porring^-` ~'~'y~Monitoiin - 5 g'~, <<,F ~~' " ~ ° ``, R 'r,, esponsib le ~ ~r ,` °~ ;,A' '"< ` ' e - ~ ~ , -~ " ~ Mttl ahonMeaeura ~ •Prooessl , ~4,„, K^ 'Mtleatone~ °#- ~ „ ~ , < ~ ~,P ~ Imttals ` Date = _ Remarks ` average delay for controlled movements Thls signal wdl need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to loin left Coordination of signal tinung with Day Creek BoulevardNlctona Gardens Lane shall be Implemented [o provide maximum use of southbound green time Signal liming must consider pedestrian crossing of the east leg of the intersection m order to connect a pedestrian trail from north to south Short northbound through green phase well require pedesmans crossing Foothill Boulevard on the east leg of this mtersechon ro crass to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedesman signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedeshlan refuge must be provided in the east leg of the mtersechon • Victoria Gardens LaneBase Lme Road - Not applicable Not applrcable Conversion of planned northbound shared through/nght loin lane to a free right turn lane Addition of a dedication eastbound right tom lane Thrs mrtrgatron measure rs not rmposed on the project, because jundrng and comp(etron ojthes rmprovement has been assured by the exrstmg CFD 200/-l at no cost to the Project • Victoria Gardens Lane/Church Street- Not applecab[e Not app(rcab(e Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for northbound right turn movement Thrs mrtrgahon measure rs not rmposed on the project, because jundrng and completion ojthrs rmprovement has been assured by the rxishng CFD 200/d at no cost to the Project C \Documenis and Senmgs\ntongV.ocal Senmgs\Temponuy Internet Files\OLK2EBVvtmgahon MDmtonng Plan_v4 ))OC (0122/2002) H-23 L LSA ASSOCIAT65, INC JANUARY 3003 FINAL EIR VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT MONITORING AND REPORTING PROC.GIM `.'~?=~'' , ^t Monitoring andReportln"g==` Y'rrMonitortitgg%~~ ~>Res`pbnslble'"n`t'~ __~'°„':~_ ~_ ' a - > ~~ Mrti anon Measure ~ - ~ + " ?,-,' %- ~&ocess ° , ~ ~-_ ~ ~fi ~r +u 'Ivltlestoiie *", ~ ~~-;y- ~ _ r ,:P ~: - v= d. -„ , Inihals~. .Date ~ - Remarks • Ehwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue - Addmon of a APPhcant shall make a fair share poor to issuance of Ctty Engineer second southbound left tum lane and a free payment to the Ctty Engineer m building permit westbound nght loin lane the amount of $10,705 • I-15 Southbound and Northbound RampsBase The City's intent is to fulfill this The Qty has Qty Engineer Line Road -Freeway interchange must be mingahon for all development deternuned this to be reconstructed [o include southbound and a public project northbound loop on-ramps Plans for the reconshuchon of this interchange are curzently being prepared by Caltrans, SANBAG, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga The reconstrnchon of this interchange well include the reconshvction of the tntersechon of East Avenue and Base Lme Road Thu mltlgahon measure a not Imposed on the project, because fhe Clty has commuted to perform these Improvements at no cost to the project • Cherry Avenue/Foothdl Boulevard -Addmon of a The Applicant shall pay the fair poor to issuance of Ctty Engineer second southbound left tom lane This mingahon share conmbuhon far traffic budding perrrut will rtiamtam the level of service at this rruhgahon m a sum of $52,500 mtersechon at its 2001 level, which did not meet to the Qty Engineer the Qty of Fontana's LOS C standard 4.1.3A Except where noted below that funding for the improvement has been assured by the City or by the exishng Corrtmunrty Facihhes District (CFD) 2001-1, the protect shall make a fair share conmbuhon to the following improvements (Year 2020) • Day Creek Boulevard/Base Lme Road -Addition Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable of a second eastbound left turn lane and a second westbound left tom lane This murgahon measure Is not tmposed on the project, because jundmg and coin leteon o this Im rovement has been C \Documents and Settmgs\nfong\Local Senmgs\Temporuy Internet Fdes\OLK2EB4Mmgahon Momtonng Plan_v4 DOC (01222002) H-24 LSA ASSOCI AT E3, INC JANUARY 3002 pINAL EIR VICTORIA GARDENS PR0J6CT APPENDI% H -MITIGATION MONITORING ANO REPORTING PROGRAM °_ ~ ` - - Miti ahonMeasure assured by the exesnng CFD 1001-1 at no cost to the Project Monitoring and Regortmg Process F . Momtonng s -`-Milestone ~ . Responsible r _ ~ P ` r~`> ` ~ -, , 'Inrttals Date -Remarks • Day Creek BoulevardNictona Gardens Lane - Applicant shall participate m the Fomiahon of CFD to City Engineer Addrtwn of a free northbound ngh[ tom lane new Community Facilities be completed pnor to Short eastbound green phase will necessitate Disfict (CFD) that well Issuance of budding prohibition of pedesfian crossing of Day Creek constmct this improvement perinit Boulevard on the south leg of this intersection • Day Creek Boulevazd/Foothdl Boulevard - Addmon of a free westbound nght tom lane, A bcant shall articl ate in the pp p p Fomlatmn of CFD to CIt En weer Y B which wdl continue to become the free new Community Famhhes be completed pnor to northbound nght tom lane a[ Day Creek Dtstnc[ (CFD) that wdl issuance of bwldmg BoulevardNlctonaGerdens Lane Conversion of construct this improvement pemut one northbound left [um lane to a northbound through lane Addition of a free northbound ngh[ [um lane, which wdl continue to become a dedicated nght tom lane at I-I S Southbound Ramps/Foothlll Boulevard Addition of a thud southbound left loin lane Conversion of southbound shared though/nght tom lane to a dedicated southbound nght [um lane Modification of signal phasing to provide nght tom overlap phasing for southbound ngh[ turn movement As an altemahve to the overlap phasing, a free (uncontrolled) nght tom for this movement would improve overall mtersecnon operations slightly and perrrut eastbound U-toms, although a LOS calculation well show greater average delay for controlled movements Thls signal wdl need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to tom left Short westbound through green phase wdl require pedesfians crossing Day Creek Boulevard on the north leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown edesfian sI al and an et h[-foot C \Documents and Settmgs\nfong\Local Settings\Tempomry Internet Fdes\OLK2EB\Mmganon Mom[onng Plan_v4 DOC (01R2Y1002) H-25 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC JANUARY iOaS PINAL E1R VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT W „ w ~! - , ,. _'X-,f it ~ , _ r ~ ` '~ ' Y.tY1Vnt4d attU ll ~`'+ „~, rttig epoitin &.x ~- Vfi ~;~~;T' °I{x,' gC7ix Yca ti'"NF ~a 1VTottiionri c~ ~; : ~ g ; ,ti ~" Ft„5 N, .. ., ,4 i- __ ~ ;~,~,Ites~otis"' le `m: ..!i,' s~ x .,~+;; . rod''' {S°,". ~ ° ~ ; ` ' ' °~ I"'E':. m ~ n r,-. ,`"-F~,'e _ Px~ r ~ '~ ~:'z ~ i -~ ~ . . ~ -, , ,s , '-~~Sv1'ih ation Measure'= , ~ ,pis 4 ~n~~.,ax ~' ~._,=at, ,.,,~~~` „T?rocess`a;,,,, - _ y '~~vu~4r,~ T>~los`t n~t~~ ~~ fr,~~,. r ~~~g, ~~ , +, ~ ~~if1~ ~titi~' ~,~;' b ;a _ w , ,~~~2 r~ ~_ s ; ;' ~ wide rased median to serve as a pedesman refuge , ~, ~.~ 5" ath+ ,« ~, ,-~,~,,`Remarks~''-~, i must be provided m the north leg of the mtersechon Southbound left tum lanes must be side-by-side with [he northbound left [urn lane at Vtctona Gardens Lane to provide sufficient queuing capacity for southbound left turn movements (See Figure 4 1 15) Coordination of signal timing with Day Creek Boulevard/Victona Gardens Lane shall be implemented to provide maximum use of southbound green time Signal hrtung must consider pedestrian crossing of the east leg of the mtersechon m orderto connecta pedesman had from north to south Short northbound through green phase will requve pedesfians crossing Foothdl Boulevard on the east leg of this mtersechon to cross [o the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase A countdown pedesman signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedesman refuge must be provided m the east leg of the mtersechon • I-15 Southbound Ramps/Foothdl Boulevard - Apphcan[ shall participate m the Formation of CFD to Addrtmn of a free eastbound nght loin lane new Community Facilities be completed pnor to City Engineer Dishict (CFD) that wdl issuance of building conshuct this im rovement eraut • Vtctona Gardens Lane/Base Line Road - Not applreab[e Not applicable Not applicable Conversion of planned northbound shared through/nght tom lane to a free nght tom lane This mrtrganon measure es not imposed an the protect, because jundmg aad complenors oJthrs improvement has been assured by the existing CFD 2001-1 a1 no cost to the Project • Vtctona Gardens Lane/Church Sheet-Addition of a second westbound left loin lane Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Modification of signal phasing to provide ngh[ loin overla halm for northbound n ht tom C \Documents and Setnngs\nfongV.ocal Settings\Tempotary IntemM Files\OLK2EB\Mmganon Monrtonng Plan_v4 DOC (012112002) H-26 TI y LSA ASSOCIATES INC JANUARY 3003 FINAL E1R VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND 0.EPORTINn PROfwAM ~;:, ~ ~s ~ Monitoring and Reporting r ~ Monitoring Responsible ,_ ~ ~~' u;;r= Mitt anon Measure ~ Process , „ ~~"Iviile`s`tone,, `P "~'__~'~~ Imnals Date°~ Remarks movement Thls mmgatron measure Is not Imposed on the project, because funding and comp[euon ojthls Improvement has been assured by the extsnng CFD 2001-1 at no cost to the Project • E[iwanda Avenue/Church Street -Addition of a dedicated northbound left tum lane, resulting m a Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable single left loin lane and a single shared through/nght loin lane Addition of a dedicated eastbound left loin lane, resulting m a single left turn lane and a single shared through/nght tom lane Addrtton of a dedicated westbound left tom lane, resulting m a single left tom lane and a single shared through/nght Nm lane This mitigation measure Is not emposed on the project, because jundmg and completeon ojthls Improvement has been assured by the existing CFD 200/-I at no cost to the Project • Ehwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a second southbound through lane, a second Applicant shall make a fair share Pnor to issuance of City Engineer northbound through lane, and a second payment to the City Engineer m building permit northbound left tom lane Modification of signal the amount of $67,720 phasing [o provide ngh[ [um overlap phasing for the northbound right tom movement • Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue -Addition of a thud and a fourth northbound through lane, a Applicant shall make a fair share Pnor to issuance of City Engineer second eastbound left tom lane, a second payment to the City Engineer m budding pernut southbound left tom lane, a second westbound left the amount of $10,705 [Note this fair share tom lane, and a free westbound right tom lane conmbution will have already been paid pursuant to the 2007 mitigation measure listed above C \Doculnrnt3 and Settmgs\nfong\Local Settings\Tempomry Internet Files\OLK2EBVvimganon MDnnonng Plan_v4 DOC (01222002) H-27 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC JANUARY 3003 FINAL EIR VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT A PPEN DI% H -MITIGATION MONITORING AND 0.EP0 RTING PROGRAM II '~ V " ~~ ~~"` ~ Monltotwg and Reporting-- , Monitotvl g " ~ ~ R~sponslble 5 "` . . Miti anon Measure ~ _ _ Process , „ ,~w ~ Mllestode„ ~ r°g P ,_~„' , Intdals ; Data' - , __ I `'~ ~Ramarks It is not intended that the applicant pay this amount twice • Ehwanda Avenue/San Bemardmo Avenue -Add Applicant shall make a fair share pnor to Issuance of Crty Engineer a second eastbound left tum lane payment to the Crty Engineer m building pemut the amount of $10,344 • I-l5 Southbound and Northbound RampsBase Line Road -Freeway interchange must be Not applicable Not applrcable Not applicable reconstructed to include southbound and northbound loop on-ramps Plans for the reconstruction of this interchange are curzently being prepared by Calhans, SANBAG, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga 7-he recons[mchon of this interchange will include the reconstmchon of [he intersection of East Avenue and Base Line Road Thrs mmgahon measure rs not imposed on the project, because the Crty has committed to perform these rmprovemenrs at no cost to the project • East AvenueBase Line Road - Mmgahon a[ this See above See above mtersechon is included as part of I-15/Base Gne Road interchange reconstmchon • Cherry Avenue/Foothdl Boulevard -Addition of a second eastbound left tum lane, a dedicated Applicant shall make a fan share Pnor to Issuance of Crty Engineer eastbound tight tum lane, a second southbound payment to the Clty Engineer m budding perrtut left loin lane, a dedicated northbound tight tom the amount of $52,500 [Note this fair share lane, and a dedicated westbound tight ttu-n lane contribution will have already been paid pursuant to the 2007 mmgahon measure fisted above [t Is not intended that the applicant pay this amount twice C \DOCOmrnLS and Settmgs\nfongu.ocal Settings\Tempornry Intemel Files\OLK2EBVvfmganon Momtonng Plan_v4 DOC (01222002) H-28 LSA ASSOCI ATE S, INC PINAL EIR JANOARY 3003 VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT APPENDI% N MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM II NOISE 41.1A Construction shall be limited to the hours of Applicant shall submit to the Pnor to the tssuance of Ctry Butldmg 6 30 a m through 8 00 p m on Monday through Crty proof [hat the mmgatmn grading permits Deparhnent Saturday, excluding national holidays No measure fisted is included m the construction shall be allowed on Sundays construction documents with the developer's contractor 4 2 16 There shall be proper wattling of and Applicant shall subnut to [he Pnor to [he tssuance of City Budding maintenance of all mtemal combustion engines for Crty proof that the mmgatton grading permits Department construction egwpment and vehicles used on the site measure listed is included m the construction documents wrth the developer's contractor 4 2 1C All stationary noise generating sources, such as Applicant shall subnut ro [he Pnor ro [he tssuance of Ctty Bwldmg air compressors and portable power generators, shall Crty proof that [he nutigahon grading permits Department be located as far away as possible from existing measure listed is included m the sensitive receptors construction documents with the developer's contractor 4.2.2A Residential amts located wrthm 86 to 172 feet Applicant shall submit to the Pnor to the issuance of City Building of the centerline of Day Creek Boulevard shall be Crty proof that the mrttgahon bmldmg permits Department egwpped with bmldmg facade upgrades, such as measure fisted is included m the double paned (or dual glazing) windows, and bmldmg plans mechanical venhlanoq such as an au condthonmg system 4 2 2B Residential units located wrthm 364 feet of the Applicant shall submit to the Prwr to the tssuance of Crty Bwldmg centerline of Day Creek Boulevard or wrthm 99 feet of Crty proof that the nuttgahon butldmg permits Department the centerline of Church Street shall be egwpped wrth measure fisted is included m the mechanical ventdatwn, such as an air condmonmg bmldmg plans system 4 2.2C Sensrttve receptors located along Vtctona The developer of the Vtctona Pnor to the tssuance of Crty Butldmg Gardens Lane wrthm the proposed Vtctona Arbors Arbors Vdlage tract shall submit butldmg permits Department Vdlage may require a six foot sound wall if outdoor to the Crty proof that the land uses fall wrthm 77 feet of the roadway A form of mmgahon measure fisted is mechanical venhlahon, such as av condthonmg, will included m the butldmg plans be required tf the residences are wrthm 165 feet of Note The a roved TTI5974 C \Documents and Settmgs\nfong\Local Senmgs\Tempomry Internet Fdes\OLK2EBUlmganon Momtonng Plan_v4 DOC (0122@002) H-29 LSA AsSOCI ATES, INC PINAL EIR JANUARY 2002 VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT APPENDI% H MITIGATION MONITORING AND 0.E PORTING PROGRAM s Victoria Gardens Lane V~ctorm Arbors Village Is conditioned to provide a sLr foot block wall) 4.2.2D Outdoor plazas and dining areas shall Applicant shall submit to the Prior to the Issuance of Ctty Building incorporate features to mask or reduce noise generated City proof that the mitigation building permits Department from project related traffic Specifically, the prodect measure fisted Is Implemented m design shall utilize water features (e g fountains), the building plans etcher alone, or m tandem with other nurse-reducing features (e g ,vegetative screening, structural design), to reduce noise levels wrthm outdoor gathering and &mng areas 4.2.3A On-srte residences located within 250 feet of Applicant shall submit to the Pnor to the Issuance of CIty Planning any loading dock shall be egwpped with mechanical CIty proof that the mingahon bwldmg permits Department ventilatwn, such as an au condrtwnmg system measure listed is implemented m the building plans 4.2 3B In accordance with City Code Section Applicant shall subnut to the On-going throughout the City Code 17 10 050 of the Performance Standards, no loading or City proof that the nutigatton Itfe of the project Enforcement unloading achvthes, including truck idling shall occur measure listed is implemented m between the hours of 10 p m to 7 a m wrthm 250 feet the building plans of any residential development AIR QUALITY 4 3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the Appbcant shall submit to the Pnor to the issuance of City Planning construction egwpment used on srte based on low City proof that the mitigation grading permits Department enussion factors and high energy efficiency The measure fisted is included m the Constmction Contractor shall ensure [hat constmc[IOn construction documents with the grading plans include a statement that all construction developer's contractor equipment will be tuned and maintained m accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize Appbcant shall submit to the Pnor to the issuance of City Building and electric or diesel powered egwpment m lieu of gasoline Ctty proof that the mrtigahon grading permits Safety Departrnent powered engines where feasible measure listed is included m the construction documents with the developer's contractor C \Documents and Senmgs\nfong\Local Senmgs\Temporary Internet Files\OLK2EB\Mmganon Monitoring Plan_v4 DOC (OI222002) H-30 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC JANUARY 100E FINAL EIR VICTORIA CAROENS PROJECT AP PENOIX H -MITIGATION MONITORING ANO REPORTING PROGRAM y 4 3 1C. The Constmchon Contractor shall ensure that Applicant shall submit to the Prior to the Issuance of Qty Bmldmg construction grading plans include a statement that City proof that the mmgahon grading pemvts Department work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use measure fisted is included in the During smog season (May through October), the construction documents with the overall length of the construction period should be developer's contractor extended, thereby decreasing [he size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and egmpment operating at the same lime 4.3 ID. The Cons[ruchon Contractor shall nine the Applicant shall submit to the Prwr to [he Issuance of City Engrneenng cons[ruchon activities so as no[ to interfere with peak hour traffic and mmim¢e obstruction of throu h traffic Clty proof [hat the mrtigahon li grading pemuts Department g lanes adjacent to the site, If necessary, a flagperson measure sted Is included in the construction documents with the shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing developer's contractor roadways 4 3 lE. The Constmcnon Contractor shall support and Applicant shall submit to [he Pnor to [he issuance of City Budding encourage ndeshanng and transit incentives for the City proof that the mmganon grading pemuts Department constmcnon crew measure fisted Is included m [he construction documents with [he developer's contractor 4.3 SF Dust generated by the development acnvines Applicant shall subrrut [o the Pnor to the Issuance of City Building shall be retained on site and kept to a minimum by City proof that the mmgahon grading perimts Department following the dust control measures listed below measure fisted Is included m [he construction documents with the a Dunng cleating, grading, earth moving, developer's contractor excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a tins[ after each day's acttvrties cease b Dunng construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas m the late mommg and after work Is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds I S miles per hour C \Documents and Semngs\nfongLLocal Settings\Tempomry Intemei Fdes\OLK2EB\Mmgahon Monitoring Plan_v4 DOC (01228002) x-3> LSA ASSOCIATES, INC JANOA 0.Y 2001 FINAL EIR VICTORIA GARDENE PROJECT AP PENDI% H -MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM y c After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be heated immediately until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur d Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with sal borders [o prevent dust generation e Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill matenals, and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be Carped from the point of origin 4.3.1 G. The Construction Contractor shall utilize as Applicant shall submit to the Prior to the issuance of City Building much as possible precoated/natural colored building Crty proof that the mitigation building permits Department matenals, water based or low VOC coating, and measure listed is included m the coating transfer or spray egapment with high transfer construction documents with the efficiency, such as a high volume low pressure (H V LP) developer's contractor spray method, or manual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge 4.3.2A. The project shall comply with Title 24 of [he The applicant shall prepare and Prior to the issuance of City Building Cahfomta Code of Regulations established by the submit to the City for review building permits Department Energy Commission regarding energy conservation and approval development plans standards that incorporate the fisted Title 24 of the Cahfomia Code of Regulations 4.3.2B. Use of transportation demand measures The applicant shall prepare and Prior to the issuance of Ctty Planning (TDM), such as preferential parking for submit to the City for review building pemuts Department vanpoohng/carpoohng, subsidy for transit pass or and approval development plans vanpoohng/carpoohng, flextime work schedule, bike that incorporate the fisted TDM racks, lockers, showers, and on-site cafeteria, shall be measures City Building incorporated m the design of the commercial land uses Department 4.3.2C. Prewire houses for electrical charging EV cars, The applicant shall prepare and Prior to the issuance of a Crty Planning if feasible Install conduits for fiber optics for submit to the City for review certficate of occupancy Department residential and non-residential uses and a royal, develo merit Ions C \Documents and Semngs\nfongU.ocal Semngs\Tempomry Intemei Files\OLK2EBVvfmgauon Momtonng Plan_v4 DOC (0122J2002) H32 LSA AS SO CI ATES, INC JANUARY E003 FINAL E1R VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT APPENDIX N -MITIGATION MONITORING AND RE PO RTINC PROGRAM ^~ V ' indicating the fiber optics rrutigatwn 4.3.2D Install EV chargers or altematrve fuel stations (natural gas) for community wide use at ke The developer shall prepare and b Pnor to the issuance of City Building y commercal and public location(s) su nut to the City for review and approval bulldmg plans that bulldmg permits for any commercial bulldmg Department incorporate the listed mmgation and/or public facility measures 4.3.2E The developer shall contract with a mitigation The developer shall submit to Pnor to the Issuance of Crty Building monitor [o assure compliance with and Implementation of the mrtgahon momtonn ro ram the City evidence that the grading permits Department g p g developer has contracted with a rruhgahon monitor to implement the mitigation momtonng PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES program 4.6.IA. The developer shall pay statutory school fees to the Ehwanda School Distnct and Chaffey Joint Proof of payment of [he applicable f Pnor to the issuance of City Bwldmg Unified High School Distnct subject to the limitations ees shall be provided to the City budding permits for any Department of Govemmen[ Code Sections 65995 a and residential development 4.6.2A The developer shall submit to the Clty a Public The developer shall subnut a Pnor to issuance of Engmeenng Safely and Secunty Plan, which identifies the Public Safety and Secunty Plan to certificate of occupancy Department developer's intent to provide safety servces to the the City for review and approval protect to supplement normal Crty police services 4.6 2B. To address the increased demand on police The developer shall submit to the Pnor to the issuance of Crty Budding services resulting from the proposed pro,7ect, an area Crty for review and approval building permits Department within the retail center will be set aside for an on-site bulldmg plans which shows an police office area set aside for a police office within the retail center Police Department 4 6.3A The developer shall Iwn Community Facilities The developer shall provide Pnor to issuance bulldmg Fire Dept Distnct (CFD) 85-I to provide fire protechon services written proof that he/she has permits Budding & Safety to the site Iomed the Community Facdrtes Department Distnct (CFD) 85-1 for fire protechon C \Documents and SenmgstnfongV-ocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK2EBVNmganon Momtonng Plan_v4 DOC (01222002) H-33 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC FINAL EIR JANUARY 1002 VICTORIA GARDENS PROJECT APPENDIX H MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM r~ V 4.6 36. The developer shall install full, automatic fire spnnklers systems m all commercial/retail, office, civic The developer shall submit to the Pnor to the issuance of Fve Departtnent and multi-fanuly residential units m accordance with City for review and approval building permits Rancho Cucamonga Fve Disvitt Ordinance No I S building plans that include and Rancho Cucamonga Fve Distnct Ordinance No autotnanc fire sprinkler systems 22 Ctty Building Department 4 63C The Fve District shall be consulted on street The developer shall provide Pnor to [he issuance of Ftre Department name assignments to assure comphance with wntten proof [o the Crty that Final Maps response plans he/she has consulted with the City's Fve Distract City Budding Department C \Documen[s and Setnngs\nfong\Local Settings\Tempomry Internet Files\OLK2EB\Mmganon Momtonng Plan_v4 DOC (01/22@002) H-34 • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 23, 2002 TO Chalrrnan and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTREPORTANDDEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT01-02 - FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC - A request to establish a Development Agreement and the detailed review of a master plan for a project known as Victona Gardens, amixed-use development consisting of approximately 2 45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses as well as 600 multiple family residential units, on approximately 175 acres of land The project site is within the City boundary and the Victona Community Plan, generally bounded byfuture Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36; and 227-211-24 and 39 thru 43 (Continued from January 9, 2002 ) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC - A request to amend the Victona Community Plan by changing the land use designation from Regional Centerto Mixed Use and modifying vanous text sections and graphics in the Community Plan to accommodate the proposed project known as Victona Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west -APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36, and 227-211-24 and 39 through 43 (Continued from January 9, 2002 ) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC -A requestto subdivide 147 acres of land into 97 parcels and 39 lettered lots (pnvate and public streets) to accommodate the proposed protect known as Victona Gardens on approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, I-15 Freeway to the east, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west APN 227-161-35, 36 and 38, 227-171-22 and 23, and 227-201-30, 33, 35, and 36 (Continued from January 9, 2002 ) BACKGROUND. The project was continued from January 9, 2002, to this meeting, at the request of the applicant In March of 2001, the Clty approved the Victona Arbors Master Plan forthe area within the Victona Planned Community previously known as the Village of Victona Lakes Along with ITEMS G, H, I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA01-02, VCPA01-01, TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC. January 23, 2002 Page 2 the Master Plan, the City adopted General Plan and Victona Community Plan Amendments to designate the area for Mixed Use development but this did not affect the Victona Gardens Regional Center site The General Plan Update adopted by the City Counal in October2001 designates the area Mixed Use. The area south of Church Street, east of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of the I-15 Freeway was designated "Regional Center" by the Victona Arbors Master Plan Forest City Development is now requesting approval of a Development Agreement that includes a Master Plan, Victona Community Plan Amendment, and Tentative Parcel Map forthe development of the Regional Center to be known as Victona Gardens. The draft Master Plan was presented to the City Counal and Planning Commission on July 10, 2001 Discussion included project phasing, how much land area would be devoted to residential development, traffic arculation, parking, tenants, and a desire for high quality design Staff has been working closely with the applicant by meeting weekly Hnth their team to assist them in prepanng a plan that best meets the City's regwrements and concerns raised at the point City Counal/Planning Commission workshop and Design Review Committee meetings The applicant has been very cooperative and accommodating inaddressing/resolving issues PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A. Surrounding Land Use North - Vacant land within the Village of Victona Arbors; Mixed Use Single-Family (4 to 6 dwelling units per acre) Victona Arbors Master Plan South - Foothill Boulevard with vacant land on the south side; Regional Related Commeraal East - I-15 Freeway West - Vacant land within the Village of Victoria Arbors and a utility comdor and single-family homes (the Rochester Tract) west of Day Creek Channel, Mixed Use Commeraal, Mixed Use Single-family (4 to 10 dwelling units per acre), Mixed Use Medwm-High Residential, Victona Arbors Master Plan B General Plan Designations Protect Site -Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - General Commeroial East - Generallndustnal West - General Commeraal and Medium Residential (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre) C Site CharactensUcs The project site is within the Village of Victona Arbors, a part of the larger Victona Planned Community The site is undeveloped and generally flat and slopes to the south It contains low growing vegetation and remnant vineyards. ANALYSIS This section of the report will summanze and analyze the indmdual entitlement applications as they relate to the Victona Gardens project A Development Agreement 01-02 A Development Agreement is a contract between the City and the applicant A Development Agreement is benefiaal to both the City and the applicant The benefits for the City include assurance that the project will be implemented as an urban village with outdoor development and that certain communityfaalities Hell be included, such as a library/community theater. The City will provide approximately 55 acres to the development and establish a Community Pastilles Distnct for road construction, which will faalitate the ~ ~ i - ~- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA01-02, VCPA01-01, TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC. • January 23, 2002 Page 3 developmentoftheRegionalCenter. The Development Agreementprovidesassurencesthat the applicant can develop and complete their protect according to the approved Master Plan for a longer penod of time than a normal Tentative Tract Map Subsequent protects such as Development Reviews for Phase 1 of the protect, anchor tenant buildings, and multi-family housing development within the Master Plan are still subtect to the City's normal discretionary review process The Development Agreement establishes development cntena in the form of a Master Plan that is included by reference with the agreement This Master Plan establishes development standards, design standards, sign standards, developmenUdesign review process, phasing, and ultimate build out character for the mall Victona Gardens is intended to be a mixed-use center (retail, high density residential, civic, cultural, open space, and office uses) developed in an open-air, urban setting (zero front and side setbacks, parking on the street, outdoor dining, streets/comdors defined by bulding edges as opposed to rolling landscaped berms and large parking lots) The development will be phased, with Phase I including the matonty of surrounding infrastructure serving the mall and a mator portion of the mall gross leasable area The protect is compnsed of four subareas 1) the downtown or core area, 2) the 18-acre residential area along the north edge of the protect to be developed in the future at a density of up to 30 units per acre, 3) the eastern (Leggin) out parcel, and 4) the southern (Foothill • Boulevard) out parcels The downtown or core area is the only part of the protect where specialized and specific development cntena will pertain This is necessary to accommodate the intense urban development of the core The residential area and the iwo out parcels will be subtect to established development cntena perthe Development Code, Victona Community Plan, and other regulations The Master Plan simply establishes a land utilization program for these areas. The building plotting is only shown to demonstrate development viability Reduced/Modified Development Standards The landscape setback along Day Creek Boulevard is proposed to be reduced from 45 feet average to 43 feet and along Victona Gardens Lane from 35 feet average to 33 feet The Master Plan calls for dense tree and shrub planting combined with high meandenng berths to offset the nominal setback reduction and effectively screen parking Furthermore, the parking fields themselves are designed with lushly landscaped planters throughout. Also, buildings are plotted along Day Creek Boulevard with increased setbacks/landscape areas in front 2 The Development Code requires the preparation of a special parking study to establish parking requirements for shopping centers of over 1,000,000 square feet of gross leasable area The Regional Center will occupy as much as 2 4 million square feet upon build out The parking study recommended a parking ratio of 4 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area for the first 1,250,000 square feet, and 4 25 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area in excess of 1,250,000 square feet Also, office space is recommended to be parked at a ratio of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The office space would utilize retail parking dunng normal business hours when retail parking demand is reduced These parking ratios were ascertained by analyzing data from the Urban Land Institute and by surveying the parking ratios of other existing regional centers The developer will utilize parking management practices such as off-site employee parking and valet parking at extremely busy times of the year should PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA01-02, VCPA01-01, TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 • Page 4 the need anse. Onginally, the Master Plan proposed up to 30 percent compact parking spaces (8 feet wide versus City's standard of 9 feet wide); however, the developer has agreed to drop that request 3 Day Creek/Foothill Boulevards Intersection Design: The Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan and the Victona Arbors Master Plan establish a lushly landscaped, 95-foot deep comer area at Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards. The applicant is concerned that this takes up substantial land area that could be used for development and is therefore proposing an alternative design The designs shown to the Design Review Committee were not favorably received The Committee agreed to a possible reduction in land area devoted to intersection treatment so long as the overall quality established by the existing design is maintained and the ultimate approved design applies to all four comers of the intersection In order to avoid delay of the overall Master Plan approval process, this matter Hall be re-addressed either in the near future or with submdtal of design review for the first phase of the project. B. Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01 • The land use forthe specific site forthe Victona Gardens development did not get changed in the Victoria Community Plan with the Victona Arbors development because of property ownership issues. The amendment would change the existing Regional Related Commeraal land use designation to Mixed Use This would allow for the urban style development antiapated by the Development Agreement and . associated Master Plan. The Amendmentalso changes, as necessary, specific exhibits within the Victona Community Plan to accommodate the Victona Gardens Regional Center development No General Plan Amendment is necessary because the land use distnct was changed to Mixed Use with approval of the 2001 General Plan Update C Tentative Parcel Mao 15716 The Tentative Parcel Map will create parcels forthe purposes of financing and conveyance of land to future tenants In some cases the parcel configurations are of odd shape but this is necessary to accommodate the urban theme of the development Note that the Tentative Parcel Map does not include subdivision of the tnangular "Leggin"site at the northeast comer of the Regional Center (south side of Church Street, west of the I-15 Freeway, and east of Victona Gardens Lane) The applicant does not have total control of this site and is therefore including it only in the Master Plan and for land use amendment (the General Plan already designates the site as Mixed Use). This explains the difference in acreage between the Master Plan area and the Tentative Parcel Map D. Desion Review Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the protect on July 17, 2001, and requested that issues related to compact parking, dnve-thru activity locations, and residential/commercal interface be restudied and brought back for further review The Committee reviewed protect revisions on November 6, 2001, and requested further enhancement of the buffenng of the interface between commercial development south of Church Street and single-family homes to the north, parkng ratios, setbacks, and dnve-thru locations. On November 27, 2001, the Committee held a speaal meeting on the revised protect and recommended approval Several items were brought back on January 15, 2002, and the Commission provided direction, which has been incorporated into the conditions of approval. Please refer to the attached Design Review Action Agendas for further details (Exhibit "E") ~~s -y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA01-02, VCPA01-01, TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 5 E Environmental Assessment An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared forthe project and acted upon separately by the Planning Commission See related staff report prepared for the Environmental Impact Report by Nancy Fong, Senior Planner CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three, 4-foot by 8-foot public heanng signs, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 600 foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Development Agreement and Victona Community Plan Amendment to the City Council through the adoption of the attached Resolution, and staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map 15716 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions wdh Conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB BLC mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" - Development Agreement Exhibit "B" - Master Plan (Provided Under Separate Cover) Exhibit "C" - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit "D" - Victona Community Plan Amendment Exhibit "E" - Design Review Committee Action Agendas dated July 17, November 6, and November 27, 2001 Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Agreement 01-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01 Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map 15716 ~ y T -S DRAFT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VICTORIA GARDENS-C, L.L.C. THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of this day of February, 2002, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation and general law city ("City"), and VICTORIA GARDENS-C, L.L.C., a California limited liability company ("Owner"). W I T N E S S E T H: A. The lack of certainty >_n the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development, and discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. B. California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5 (the "Development Agreement Statute") were therefore enacted authorizing a municipality to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property. C. By virtue of a Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") dated February 2002 and an option agreement with Church Gardens LLC dated November 15, 2000, Owner has a legal or equitable interest in approximately 165 acres of real \l 11 83966 B 1 l7 ~~l ~ ~p 01/15/02 Zais~i~o G _ 1 ~H~ z uo usid iszaua~ aq~ pus usid ~;ru pus ZOOZ Azsnzgag uo usid za~ssW ~rJ„ sbuowsonJ ouousg .C~rJ auk 'sbuowsonJ ogous~ ;o .~~?J aq~ 8 996£8 1wwoJ aq~ o; s;uawpuaws aq; panozdds „i?ounoJ . 30 ~~?J auk 3o i?ounoJ ;o uorssrwwoJ buTiSLISid au; ~Cq Marnaz bu?MOiio,3 •(„dsW an?;s;uay„ au;) •oN ds~ ;oszy anr~s~uay pus '(„usid za;ssW„ auk) usid za;ssW suapzs~ s?zo~o-En au; 'usid za;ssW szogz~ s?zo;o?n aq; '(„usid ~~runwwoJ„ aq;) usid h;TUnwwoJ s?zo;o?n aq; '(„usid iszauaJ„ aq~) usid iszaua~ s,~C;rJ au; bu?pniou? s~uawnoop uo?sTnTpgns pus bu?uoz 'buruusid ~;rJ .Cq pauzanob aq iiiM ;oaCozd auy •g sasn ~uawurs;za;ua pus ;uszns~saz 'i?s~az sau~o 30 '3's 000'05£ ;ssai ~s pus (azow zo 3's 000'08 gosa) sazo;s irs~az „zoCsw„ aazu~ ;ssai ;s apniour iiTM („I assud„) ;oaCozd aq; ;o assud ;sz?; auy („;oaCozd„ aq;) „g„ ~rgTuxg ss o~azau pagos;;s q~oq ;uawpuaws usid ~~?unwwoJ s?zo;orn aq; ur paq?zosap ss pus usid an?qsz;snit? auk uo (;nopi?nq ;s) pa~ordap ss ~Ciiszauab sa?;?i?os; ~;?unwwoo pus sbu?iiaMp isr;uap?saz 'sasn ao?;;o 's~ai;no ;uawurs~za;ua pus s~uszns;saz 'sasn istozawwoo .C;inroads 's;usua; irs~az zoCsw q~TM xaidwoo asn pax?w zrs-uado „uMO;ur+~op Mau„ s ss padoianap aq iirM ~C~zadozd aq~ '~{;rJ au; pus zauMp ;o ~uawaazbs isn~nw ~Cq awry o; aw?~ woz; pa?;?pow ss(MOiaq paur;ap) „sisnozdd~ ;oaCozd„ auk ;o suorsrnozd au; o~ ~oaCgnS "Q ( „~C;zadozd,. auk ) aouaza;az srq; ~Cq u?azaq pa~szodzoout pus o;azaq pagos;qs „~„ ;?q?uxg u? pagrzosap ~Cizsinor;zsd azow ~;rJ u? pa;soot ~;zadozd SdFRTQ ZO/ST/TO ~_ ~ r/ ~(1 £ 8 996£8 r /T/7 J :~{~?untumoo aq~ puE ~~?J zo; sjEOb • jET~OS puE oimouooa uua~-buoj buijji;jn3 'T :biliMOjjO; auk 'szaq~o buourE 'bu?pnjoui 'ski;auaq oijgnd u? ~jnsaz jj?M puE sjanozdd~ aoaCozg aq~ TITLj~TM pauiE~uoo sani~oaCgo bu?uuEjd anisuagazdmoo arj~ zaq~zn; jjiM ~oaCoz3 aT;~ ;o ~uawdojanaQ 'H „sjenozdd~ ~oaCozg„ aT;~ sE o~ pazza;az zap;EU?azaT; azE '~uaiuaazb~ s?u~ ;o a~Ep aq~ bu?pnjoui puE gbnozq~ .C~?J auk .Cq panozddE buiobazo; aq~ ;o ~CuE o; s~uampuamE buipnjoui 'dE~y ani~E~uay puE (mEZbozd abeub?s uEjd za~sEy~ aq~ o~ pa~iwij you ~nq buipnjou?) uEjg za~sEw 'mEZbozg bu?zo~iuow uoi~Ebi~iw puE uoi~EOi;?~zao gig 'uEjg za~sEW szogz~ E?zo~oin 'uEj3 .C~iununuoJ 'uEjg jezauaJ auk . '~jani~oajjoJ •„J„ ~igii[Xg sE uiazaq pa~EZOdzoou? puE o~azaT~ pagoE~~E s? dEy~ an?~E~uay aT~~ ;o uoi~oidap ~ •J •~uawaazbti ~uawdojanaQ s?q~ puE ~oaCoza aT~~ ;o s~oEdmi jE~uamuozinua paz~Cj2uE gig auy '(„2IIg.. aTI~)8ZOi£OTOOZ 'oN asnoubuizEajJ a~E~g sE pa?;?~uap? ~CjjEO?;?Dads azom 6uiaq ~zodag ~oeduii jE~uamuoz?nug jEUig Tons '~o~{ I~ijana jE~uamuozinug ETiI30;TjE,7 aq~ ;o suois?nozd auk o~ ~uEnsznd boa Cozg suapzEJ EizO~~TA aq~ zo; ~zodag ~oedwi jE~uamuoz?nug jeu?g E pa?;i~zao 'sbuipu?; a~EizdozddE buixEw zap;E 'EbuomEOnJ ogouEg ;o A~?J aq~ ;o jiounoJ ~C~iJ auk 'ZOOZ A.iEnzgag up •g ZOOZ ' uo dEN an?~E~uay auk panozddE EbuomEOnJ ogouEg 30 ~~?J aq~ 3o LIOTSSiU11llOJ buiuuEjd aqy ' ZOOZ iLzEnzgag .L~3tf2tQ ZO/ST/LO / ~ ij 8 996E8 ~-~+~~ a~n~e~g ~uawaazb~ ~uawdojanaa aq~ zapun a~eizdozdde si ~uawaazbe ~uawdojanap e T.~ozgM zo; ~uawdojanap e si ~oaCozd aq~ ~eq~ pauzwza~ap seq ~~iJ 'uiazaq pa~ioaz suoseaz aq~ zo3 'I ~oaCozd aq~ uiT~~iM za~eaq~ ~S~iunwwoo/~.zezgit e ;o ~uawdojanap s,~C~i~ aq~ bui~e~ijtoeg •6 pus :~C~iunwwoo aq~ ;i;auaq ~CZjei~ue~sgns TiTM ~eu~ („za~ua~ Tezozawwo~ Zeuoibad„) za~uao jeiozawwoo teuoibaz a ;o ~uawdotanap aq~ buipnZout 'pazzjeaz aq jjiM sjenozdd~ ~oaCozd aq~ ;o sZeob aq~ ~eq~ ~C~iZigissod aq~ aoueT~ua ~Ct~ueoz;iubig •g :s~uawaja teuoi~eazoaz anissed put ani~oa s ,~C~i~ buiouetlug ' ~ :spaau 6uisnoq teuotbaz ;o azegs s,~C~z~ ~aaw o~ uoi~ebiZgo s,~C~i~ ~;sues o~ dtau jjiM gotuM bu,:snor~ butpznozd • 9 '~uawdoZanap a~enizd q~zM s~uawanozdwi azn~onz~sez;ui oitgnd ;o uoi~onz~suoo aq~ buisegd 'S ~C~iunwwoo aq~ pue uoibaz aq~ anzas jjTM ~eu~ s~uawanozdwi azn~onz~sez;ui ~ueoi;iubis bui~onz~suoo pue buzoueuig •y :lt~i,7 iI ZL[~TM ~uaw~Cojdwa ~uauewzad wzaq-buot pue ~uaw~Cojdwa uo,:~on.z~suoo wza~-~zogs u~oq 6uipinozd '£ :pung jezaua~ s,~C~i~ o~ s~z;auaq Zeosz; buipznozd 'Z r-~ ~~ SdFr2TQ • DRAFT J. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that this Agreement Project Approvals and specifically Agreement is fair, just and reason. that the economic interests of its health, safety and welfare will be this Agreement. is consistent with the has determined that this able, and City has concluded citizens and the public best served by entering into K. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "Planning Commission") held duly noticed public hearings on this Agreement on January _, 2002 and recommended approval of this Agreement. L. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, after a duly noticed hearing, adopted Ordinance No. , approving this Agreement, which ordinance will become effective on March 2002 (the "Effective Date"). NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing recitals and in consideration of the mutual promises, obligations and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall have the meanings defined for such terms in the Sections set forth below: Term Agency Agreement Section o .....~... T[T v Recital C Introduction Section III.B.1. n..+...F+4....1 n+....~... +..,-+..... 6ee~rar~I['~--ter • 83966 8 CJ i~J~ _~~ 01/15/02 DRAFT I~:l-~~ Applicable Rules CFD Section IV.B. City Introduction City Council Recital E Community Plan Recital n....: ,-..l E n Development Agreement Statute ICGLTC6T Recital v B DDA Recital C Effective Date Recital L EIR Recital F Master Plan Recital E ,.____..:.._ •R....L.......... ~.....:.... T1/ n Section III.C. Future Approvals General Plan Recital E Ministerial Approvals Section IV.C. Mortgagee Section V.C. Notice of Non-Compliance Section V.F. Owner Introduction Planning Commission Recital K Project Recital D Project Approvals Recital G Property Recital ~..i c~~l . C -P~ec . r ................t Regional Commercial Center n.•-•~cc~ cc` ~r3r Recital v H Related Parties Section n....._....r VI.J. ~n o.....~.. v v Subsequent Rules Section III.B.2. Tentative Map Recital E Term Section ~....L ~.. P J V.K.~a ~..F ..~. TTT T BSNSFITS TO CITY. In consideration of the benefits resulting from this Project, including, but not limited to, increasing the likelihood of development of the Regional Commercial Center, the significant infrastructure improvements that Owner will be contributing to through a CFD as described below, and the benefit to the community that the development of the Project represents, all of which will provide a significant overall benefit to City, City has agreed to enter into this Agreement. 83966 8 6 ~ ~ ~/ _// 01/15/02 ZO/ST/TO ~/^ ~'H 1 [, 8 996E8 30 .Cue o~ za3az o~ azn~n3 aq~ u? 1C.zessaoau sawooaq ~i 3i ~eu~ • os 'zau[np zo3 has auo pue R~tp zo3 has auo 'saing aigeozidd*~ aq~ 3o spas ieo?~uapt oM~ .Cdoo pue ai?dwoo o~ s~zo33a aigeuoseaz asn iiegs zauMp pue ~;?p 'area an?~oa33g aq~ o~ zo?zg ~C~tp uz .C~zadozd iie o~ aigeotidde .Ciiezauab ate sabuego eons ~eq~ pap?nozd 'apop 6u?gwnid wzo3iun zo 'apop ieo?uegoay; wzo3zun 'apop azi3 wzo3iun 'apop ieo u~oai~ wzo3iun 'apop butpi?ng wzo3iun aq~ uz awt~ o~ awi~ woz3 bu?zznooo sabuego bu?~Cidde woz3 ~~?p apnioazd iieus ;uawaazb~ s?u~ uz bu?u~ou 'buiobazo3 aT;~ buzpue~sq~?M~oN •(„saing aigeo?iddK„ aq~ 'Tian?~oaiioo) sienozdd~ ~oaCozg aq~ 'uoi~e~iwzi ~noT.j~zen 'bu?pniou? 'area an?~oa33g aq~ 3o awz~ aq~ ~e aozo3 ui sa?o?iod ie?oi33o pue suo?~einbas 'saint asoq~ aq iiegs ~i~zadoza auk 30 ~uawdoianap • o~ aigeoiidde suoi~eoi3?Dads pue ~uawanozdwi 'ubisap bu?uzanob pue '~C~?soap bu?uzanob 'sasn pa~~?wzad buzuzanob sa?o?iod iazoi33o pue suoi~einbaz 'saint aq~ '~uawaazb~ s?u~ 3o wza~ aq~ zo3 ';eq~ aazbe Agazau sa?zed aqy •saing aigeo?i ~ •sa?o?Tod ieTO?330 pus suo?rein a~ 'saing •(paui3ap za~3euiazaq se) „saing aigeo?idd~„ auk pue sienozdd~ ~oaCoza aq~ '~uawaazb~ szu~ u? c(~zo3 tae asoT;~ aq iieus 's~uawanozdw? oiignd 3o uo?~eooi pue sasodznd o?ignd zo3 puei 3o uo?~eoipap zo uo?~enzasaz zo3 suois?nozd 'sbu?pirnq pasodozd 3o azrs pue ~gbiaq wnwzxew aq~ 'asn 30 .C~zsua~u? pue ~~?soap auk 'sasn pa~~?wzad aq~ '~uawaazb~ srq~ 3o wza~ ar;~ zo3 '~eu~ aazbe ~Cgazau sa?zed aqy •sasn pa~~?wzaa • yr~aozsnsa so$roxa • ya~zra DRAFT the Applicable Rules, there will be a common set of the Applicable Rules available to both parties. Conflicting Enactments. Any change in the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, any change in any applicable general, community plan, master plan, area or specific plan, zoning, subdivision rule or regulation, adopted or becoming effective after the Effective Date, including, without limitation, any such change by means of an ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Planning Commission • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga or any other board, agency, commission or department of City, or any officer or employee thereof, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Property and which would conflict in any way with or be more restrictive than the Applicable Rules ("Subsequent Rules"), shall not be applied by City to the Property, except for any Federal or State law. Setbacks, Design Guidelines, Landscape Guidelines and Park Improvements. The front, side, and rear setbacks for all dwelling units and commercial structures shall be consistent with the Applicable Rules. Design guidelines, landscape guidelines and park improvements shall conform to the Applicable Rules. 83966 8 ~ ~,l ~.~ 8 a~i~5ioz ZO/SS/LO ( 8 996E8 ~/ - ~ h ~ . zapun pauT;ap sT wza; ~Eu; sE '„~ubTZ pa;san„ E anEu jjEus zauMp puE 'sajng ajgEOTjdd~ aq~ ;o zed awooaq 'zauMp ;o uoT~oaja ua;~TZM aq; ;E 'jjEus rCau; 'awT~ o; awT~ woz; papuawE aq ~Cew ~Cau~ sE 'sjenozdd~ azn~ng az;; ;o .{uE ;o buT;uezb uodn • sajng ajgEOijdd~ auk uEu~ anT~oTZ;saz zo snozauo azow ~SjjEi;uE~sgns azE s~uawazznbaz puE sajnz Mau auk ssajun sjenozdd~ azn~ng o~ ~Cjdde jjEgs 'spo uad jeadde puE s~uawazTnbas aoi;ou o~ pa~Twzj ;ou ~nq buTpnjoui 'apTM-~~i~ ajgEOTjdde puE .C~i~ auk ~Cq pa~dope s;uawaztnbaz puE sajnz jeznpaoozd MaN •sajng ajgeoTjdd~+ puE sjenozdd~ ~oaCozd auk ueu~ snozauo zo anT~otz~sas azow sT ~eu~ uoz~oTZ;saz zo uoz;Tpuoo 'uoi~oexa 'aa; ~IuE asodwT you jjEus A~i~ 'uejd za~sEW auk ua?M ~ua~sisuoo ~uawdojanap zo; sjEnozdd~ azn;ng u~TM uoT~oauuoo ui •MEj jezapa3 zo a~E~g .~q pazTnbaz ~jjEOT;Toads aeTMZau~o sE ~daoxa 'sajng ajgeoijdd~ puE sjEnozdd~ ~oaCozg auk u;tM qua;sisuoo azE ~Eu~ s~uawaj;T~ua .LzEUOi;azosTp eons uodn suoT~ipuoo asodwz ~Cjuo .CEw ~~i~ puE '~uawaazb~ ;uawdojanaQ sTu~ ;o suoisinozd auk o~ ;oaCgns ~Ijssazdxa aq jjEgs MaTnaz fCzEUOT;azosTp eons .tuE 'zanaMOg ajgEOtjdde ;T 'MaTnaz ubTSap/~uawdojanap puE sdEw jaozed 'dew ~oez~ ant;E~ua~ azn~n; o~ pa~Twrj you ~nq 'butpnjout '~oaCosd auk ;o ~uawdojanap zo; s~uawaj~T;ua ~C.zEUOt~azosTp azn;n; o~ ~oadsaz Lj~TM ~;zzou;nE MaTnaz ~.ZEiIOT~a.ZJSTp ajgEOTjddE Cue uie~az jjEus /C~T,~ •(„sjenozdd~ azn;ng„ auk '~Cjani~oajjoo) sajng ajgEOijdd~ au'~ .{q paztnbaz sjEnozddE ~C.zeuoT~azosTp jjE azinbaz jjEus ~I~zadozd auk ;o ;uawdojanap ~Cu*d •sjenoz ~ azn;ng S3Ff?IQ . DRAFT California law, in and to such Future Approvals by virtue of this Agreement. Permitted Fees. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, and specifically excluding fees set by entities not controlled by City that are collected by City, City shall only charge and impose those fees and exactions, including, without limitation, dedications and any other fee or tax (including excise, construction or any other tax) relating to development or the privilege of developing, in the amount, if any, in effect on a City-wide basis as of the Effective Date. Owner shall only be responsible for payment of those development fees listed >.n the attached Exhibit "D" to be calculated as indicated therein. This Section shall not be construed to (i) limit fees charged by governmental agencies or utility providers other than the City; or {~} ii limit the authority of City to charge normal and customary application, processing, and permit fees for land use approvals, building permits and other similar permits, which fees are designed to reimburse City's expenses attributable to such application, processing and permitting and are in force and effect on a City-wide basis at such time as said approvals and permits are granted by City. Permitted Conditions. Provided Owner's applications for any Future Approvals are consistent with this Agreement and the Applicable Rules, City shall process in a timely manner the Future Approvals in accordance with the Applicable Rules and reasonably expedite development of the Property for the uses and l7, /-// ~ -/~ 83966 8 1 ~ 01/15/02 ZO/SL/ZO j T 8 996 E8 ~~ -' ~ ~ iET~uaptsaz aq~ uo uor~onz~suoo aouawwoo o~ pai~r~ua aq you iiTM • ~r ~Eq~ saazbE zauMp 'buiobazo; auk buTpuE~su~tM~oN ~uawbpnC ssauisnq ani~oaCgns ski ;o asiozaxa auk utu~rM a~ETZdozddE swaap zauMp sE sawT~ Bons ~E puE a~EZ eons ~E puE zapzo Bons uT .C~zadozd aril doianap o~ (uoi~Ebzjgo ~nou~TM) ~gbrz aq~ anEu iTEgs zauMp ~ELj~ butprnozd puE buzbpaiMOUxoE ~Cq .Couator;ap ~Eij~ azno o~ ~ua~ut ,sai~zed ac(~ ei ~? '~uawaazbE ,saz~zEd aq~ zano iTEnazd o~ ~uawdojanap ;o buiwt~ aq~ 6ui~oiz~saz anT~Er~tui pa~dopE -za~Ei E u-E pa~insaz ~uawdoianap ;o butwi~ aq~ zo; apinozd o~ utazau~ sai~zed aq~ ;o azniiE3 auk ~Eu~ '(~86T) 59b PE'iEJ L£ 'oTiizEwE~ ;o n~t~ •n •o~ uot~onz~suo~ aapzEg ui piau ~zno~ awazdng Eiuzo;TiE,7 aq~ asnEOag •~uaw oianaQ ;o uiwiy • •MOiaq x•n uoz~oag ut q~zo; tae sE ~uawaazb~ sru~ ;o a~Ep uoi~EUrwza~ paTnpauos aq~ ubnozu~ awry ;o poizad E zo; papua~xa aq iiEus siEnozdd~ ~oaCozd auk ;o goEa ;o wza~ aq~ puE ~C~zadozd auk ;o uor~zod puE zo iiE uo passaoozd aq ~CEw ~ELZ~ dEw jaozed zo uoisrnipgns ~{uE ;o wza~ at;~ '6'£9859 puE (E)9'ZSb99 suoi~oag apo~ ~uawuzano~ Etuzo;ijE~ o~ ~uanszng •siEnoz ~ ~oa,ozd zaq~p puE (s) E[n] ;o wzay sdEw uorstntpgns anz~E~ua~ ~uanbasgns buinozddE ui 'g ~igzz;xg uz q~zo; has sE saznseaw iIOT~Ebi~Tjnj ~jj$ aigEOTTddE ~CuE puE dEy~ ani~E~uay ac~~ zo; iEnozddg ;o suot~ipuo~ aq~ apnioui q~TL;M „'g„ ~igiz(xg par~oE~~E aq~ uo pa~EOipui suot~Tpuoo asou~ q~iM ~ua~srsuoo suot~zpuoo asodwr o~ ~gbrz aq~ anEq ~{iuo iiEga tC~r~ •urazaq pagTZOSap ~oaCozg aq~ ;o .~~TSUap auk o~ .E3FRIQ ZO/ST/TO zZ C/ - l~N 8 996E9 '.C~zadozd zo poet ;o ~uawdoZanap eons joz~uoo zo a~eTnbaz o~ ~C~r~ua oijgnd e ;o ;ubiz ar;; pue .C;zadozd zo poet ;o ;uawdotanap au; o; aZgeotjdde Met etuzo;tZe~ zapun paut;ap si wza; ;eu~ se '„s~ubta pa~san„ ;o ;uaZentnba auk zo „s~ubtz pa~san„ a;n;r~suoo pue aq ZLeus ;uawaazb~ sru~ o~ ~uensznd sauMp o; pa~uezb s~uawaj~z~ua pue s;ubtz auy •s~u t~ s,zauMp ;o ur;san •~C~zadozg auk zo/pue .C~t~ au; nano uor~otpstznC butneu s;znoo zo (~ou~stQ za~eM ~i~uno~ ebuoweon~ auk o~ pa~iwrT ;ou ;nq buipnjoui) sarouabe je~uawuzanob zau~o ~tq pazrnbaz ;ua~xa auk o~ sLIOr~E~iwrj zau;o zo eizo;ezow u;rM aoueitdwoo s,.C~r~ ;oa;;e ;ou tteus uoi;Dag szq; ;o suotstnozd aq; 'zanaMOu 'paptnozd :~uawaazb~ sru; u;zM ;ort;uoo ui si not;e~iwzj zau;o zo wnizo~ezow gone ;ua~xa auk o~ ~;zadozd auq o; ~Ctdde iteus '~C~z~ ;o suoi;zod zo '.~~t~ utu~zM pa;uezb zo panssr 'panozdde (zaMas pue za;eM 'uoz;e;zwzT ;nou~iM 'buipntout) aotnzas zo asn o~ s~uawaZ~i~ua zau~o zo sa;eoi;z~zao ~ouednooo 's;twzad buzpjinq '(teut; zo anzge;ua~ 6ur~san 'ant~e~ua~ zau'~auM) sdew uotstntpgns zo Zaozed but~oa;;e (asiMZau~o zo 'a~ezo;Data auk '~C]TJ ;o ~Couabe ue 'ebuoweon~ ououeg ;o ~;t~ au; ;o Ztouno~ ~~i~ au; ~Cq pa~oeua zaq;auM pue 'astMZau;o zo zapzo '~CotZod 'uoi;njosaz 'ant~et~tut 'aoueutpzo ~Cq pasodwz zau'~auM '~C~zadozg au'~ ;o ;.zed Cue zo jte ;o uoi;onz~suoo zo ;uawdojanap aq; ;o buiouanbas zo buiwt; 'a;ez auq o; but~eZaz zau;auM) [IOt~e~TI11Tj zau;o zo wnrzo;ezow pasodwz-~C~t~ off •wnizo;ezoW ~oaCozd aq; ;o ;uauodwoo Zze;az au; ;o i aseud uo paouawwoo seu uor;onz~suoo zap;e su~uow xis Zi~un ~oaCozg auk ;o uor~zod .LdF~2TQ r1 LJ • ZO/SS/SO £'[ 8 996 E8 • Hoxs~rs.N~za~x/xoxsfrx~aooo •Zo.z~uoo jjEgs ~uawaazb~ srq~ ;o suoTSTnozd aq~ '~uawaazb~l sru~ puE sZEnozdd~ ~oaCoza aq~ ;o .{uE uaaM~aq .~oua~srsuoouT ~CuE ;o Juana aq~ ui •stEnoz ~ ~oa,ozd/~uawaaz ~ ~uaw oTanaQ •uoi~oas sTq~ o~ ~uensznd suoi~ETZEn ~uEZb o~ d~tzoq~nE aq~ anEu jtEgs zabauEyq ~C~r~ aqy • sTEno.zdd+~ ~oaCozg aye i[~TM qua~sisuoo a.zn~onz~sez;ui a~EnbapE aznsua o~ sanur~uoo uor~ETZen aq~ sE buoj os zauMp ~Cq pa~sanbaz uor~Ei.zEn atgauosea.z ~CuE ~Twzad TZEus d~i~ puE u~TE; pooh uz a~EZOgETToo iiEgs ~~T~ puE .zauMp 'age aq~ .~q pa~Etdwa~uoo .{tsnoina.zd zapzo aq~ woz; saizEn ~Eij~ .zapzo uE uT azn~onz~s2z;ui s,~oaCo.zg auk ;o uoi~.zod ~CuE dojanap o~ atgezrsap zo ~C.zessaoau awooaq ~T ptnogs ~Eq~ aa.zbE Igazar; zauMp puE ~~r~ 'azo;azauy •Q3~ aq~ .{q pa~onz~suoo sr azngon.z~sE~;ui ai~~ goTuM ui zapzo aqa buzbuEi~o agEq-ESSaoau ~CEw suoz~Tpuoo ~axzEw puE orwouooa ~Eij~ aziubooaz ~~zQ puE zauMp 'stEnozdd~ ~oaCosa at;~ ;o ~CuE ;o suorsinozd aq~ 6uzpuE~sr~~iM~oH ~iTigixaj3 uTSEua azn~onzgsas;ul •joi~uoo s,d~T~ puo~Caq suosEa.z zo; ~daoxa '~oaCoza aqq zo; aoin.zas zo sdnxoou uo uoT~or.z~saz ou aq ZTEtjs azaq~ ~Eq~ puE ~oaCo.xg aq~ an.zas jZTM ~i qEq~ saasbE Agazaq f~T~ 'saoin.zas LSOi~E~iIIE6 puE Zo.z~uoo pool; 'abaurEZp w30~6 'iIOi~EjnJST~ ~i;;E2~ iIO T'~E~TwTj ~nOLj~TM buipnjoui 'EazE ~oaCosg ar~~ uz azn~onzgsaz;ur puE aoTn.zas ~C~Ttr~n ;o .xapinozd aq~ sT ~~r~ ~Eq~ ~ua~xa ai~~ oy TOE E~ azn~onzgsez;ui ~CouEdnooo ;o sa~EOi;i~zao puE s~zw.zad buTpjTnq o~ puE uT s~r~biz pa~san 'uoTgEgiwiT ~noq~TM 'buTpnTour • .L3Ff2IQ ZO/Si/LO ~jT ~ 8 996 E8 bi- T 'N ~ ;o aouenssr zo 'stenozdd~ azn~ng auk ;o jenozdde '~oaCoza aqy ;o uo?~onz~suoo zo burssaoozd '~uawdotanap aL{~ doffs zo • ~CeZap o~ zauMp azrnbaz you tZei~s rC~zadozd aqy bur~oa;;e sanssr ~uawdoTanap zaq~o o~ zo sjenozdd~ ~oaCozg aqy '~uawaazb~ s?u~ o~ bur~eTaz zauMp zo I~?J Hsu?ebe (s)~?nsMej dazed pz?u~ .Cue ;0 6urjr; aqy •uor~e r~r7 ~zeg pzrt;y urznQ urssaoozg •~oaCozg aqy q~rM pa~eroosse s~uawanozdw? o?jgnd due aprnozd zo zo; ded o~ pazrnbaz aq you Zjegs zauMp '~uawabuezze buroueu?; anr~euza~te panozdde-dTTen~nw zo s~uawnooQ QgJ auk i~]TM aouepzoooe ur d~zadozg auk uo pasodwr s~uawssasse zo saxes teroads pue ~uawaazb~ sru~ zapun aZgeded sea; ;o ~uawded aqy zo; ~daoxg •zautnp pue d~rJ dq panozdde dZgeuoseaz ~uawabuezze bu?oueur; an?~euza~te ue dq zo '(„s~uawnooQ Q3J„ auk) Q3J at;~ q~?M uor~oauuoo u? pa~dope pue zauMp pue ~~?J • dq panozdde djgeuoseaz s~uawnoop bur~uawajdwr zau~o pue poq~aw pue a~ez E L[~TM aJTSEpSO~~E ur pasodw? saxes teroads pa~eroosse pue („Q3J..) d~rJ aL['~ ;O ~~rz~sTQ saT'~rTr~e,3 d'aTUnwwO,'~ e dq (TT) zo :zauMp dq ajgeded „Q„ ~?grgxg uo pa~srt sea; (r) dq zaq~ra papun; aq jjegs sjenozdd~ ~oaCozg auk q~rM uo?~oauuoo ur az?nbaz jjTM d~?J aqy ~eq; s~uawanozdw? ortgnd airs;;o aqy ;o jje ;o iIOr~ejjE~siIT ;o ~soo aqy •s~uawanoz wI ;o uroueu?,3 o?tgng ~uawaazby sru~ ;o san?~oaCgo pue sasodznd aii~ ana?qoe o~ zadozd zo dzessaoau aq dew ~eu~ 'sburarzM pue s~uawnoop tte pue due 'pazrnbaz ;? '~rnepr;;e zo auawbpajMOUxJe ij~tM 'a~noaxa pue 'sbu?u~ jZe op pue suor~oe jje axed Tteus dazed goeg •s~uawnooQ u rg o~ ~ueuanoJ :saoueznss~ zaq~zng SdF~XQ • DRAFT • "Ministerial Approvals" (as hereinafter defined), unless the third party obtains a court order preventing the activity. City shall not stipulate to the issuance of any such order. For purposes of this Agreement the term "Ministerial Approvals" shall be defined to mean approvals requiring the determination of conformance with the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, site plans, design review, development plans, land use plans, grading plans, improvement plans, building plans and specifications, and ministerial issuance of one or more final maps, zoning clearances, grading permits, improvement permits, wall permits, building permits, lot line adjustments, encroachment permits, conditional and temporary use permits, . certificates of use and occupancy and approvals and entitlements and related matters as may be necessary for the completion of the development of the Property. State, Federal or Case Law. Where any state, federal or case law allows City to exercise any discretion or take any act with respect to that law, City shall, in an expeditious and timely manner, at the earliest possible time, (a) exercise its discretion in such a way as to be~consistent with, and carry out the terms of, this Agreement and (b) take such other actions as may be necessary to carry out in good faith the terms of this Agreement. Other Governmental Bodies. To the extent that City, the City Council, Planning Commission or any other City agency . constitutes and sits as any other board or agency, it shall not G, N, T -zo 83966 B 1 5 01/15/02 DRAFT take any action that conflicts with City's obligations under this Agreement. Owner shall be responsible for obtaining all Project permits and approvals, if any, needed from the County of San Bernardino, the State of California, or other governmental agencies with authority over the Project; provided, however, that City shall cooperate by attending meetings with the agencies and supporting Owner's applications for such permits and approvals. Defense of Agreement. City shall take all actions which are necessary or advisable to uphold the validity and enforceability of this Agreement. If this Agreement is adjudicated or determined to be invalid or unenforceable, City agrees, subject to all legal requirements, to consider modifications to this Agreement to render it valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by applicable law. Design/Development and Maintenance Standards. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Applicable Rules, the following design/development standards shall apply to the Project: 1. This Agreement shall grant Owner the vested right to develop the Project consistent with the Project Approvals; 2. The Project shall be subject to design review, to the extent required pursuant to the Master Plan; 3. Easements dedicated for pedestrian use shall be permitted to include easements for underground drainage, water, sewer, gas, electricity, telephone, cable and other utilities y,l -Z / 63966 8 ~ 1 6 01/15/02 ZO/St/t0 (,T 8 996E8 2~-.~~~ ;o ~uaw~zedaQ eiuzo;TTe~ auk ubnozq; suejd ~uawanozdwz a~ipadxa pue a~euTpzooo dTau TTegs ~~t~ •sueTg ~uawanoz wI sbuTpaaoozd Eons q~TM pa~eTOOSSe (peauzano pue awz; ;;ens ~~z~ 6uTpnToxa) sasuadxa pue s~soo aq~ fed TTegs 'ajgeoiTdde ;T '~oTZ~s-rp 6uzoueuT; zaq~o zo Q3J auk zo 'zauMp AgazauM A~T,~ aq~ q~iM ~uawaazbe ue o~uT za~ua TTegs zauMp 'zauMp ~Cq pa~sanbaz sbuTpaaoozd uTewop ~LIaTITwa Cue ;o ~uawaouawwoo age o~ ~uapaoazd uoT~Tpuoo e s~ •sTenozdd~ ~oaCozg age g~zM ~ua~sTSUOo ~oaCozd age an.zae o~ azn~onz~sez;uT a~TS;;o pue suzseq uot~ua~ap ~{zezodwa~ 'burpezb 'speoz ;o uoi~onz~suoo zo; pazTnbaz seaze ~uawasea pue .CeM-;o-s~gbzz a~TS;;o ~C.zessaoau azTnboe o; uiewop ~uauzwa ;o zaMOd s~T asn TTegs (~oiz~sip buTOUeui; zo (age) ~o a ~sTa saT~zTzoeg ~C~TUnwwo~ aTgeoiTdde ue gbnozg~ zo ;Tas~T) • A~T~ '~C~TSSaoau ;o uoT~nTosaz a ;o uoi~ezapzsuoo ;o sasodznd zo; buzzeag oTTgnd e ;o buzpTog buTpnToui 's~uawazinbaz TebaT aTgeoTTdde TTe o~ ~oaCgns pue 'A.xessaoau ;I •uoz~euwapuo~ •uTSeq uoT~ua~az~uoi~ua~ap .{ue buT~eazo ~nog~tM Tauueg~ xaaza lCEQ g~TM ~oauuoo o~ ~oaCozd age zo; ~gbiz a~nTosge age aprnozd o~ ;oTZ~sia Toz~uo~ pooTg .C~uno~ age g~TM suoz~ei~obau ~zoddns gaze; pooh uT pue ~CT~uabTTTp TTegs Rath •Tauueg~ xaaz~ ea ebuoweon~ ogoueg ;o ~~i~ age ui sza~uao Tie~az zag;o buowe aoueua~uiew ;o pzepue~s buTTienazd age ~seaT ;e o~ aTgezedwoo uoi~ipuoo pooh uz .Z~zadoza age uTe~uiew TTegs zauMp '~uawdoTanap buTMOTTog •{, pue :asn uezz~sapad g~TM aza;za~uT ~tTgeuoseazun you op ~Sag~ se 6uoT os saT~TTTOe; pue • .L3~27a ZO/9i/SO 8 j 8 996 E8 ~ Z - 1 ~ ~~ uo pauTe~uTew pue pa~oaza aq ~Cew ubzs uot.{d auo .{juo 'sa~etTt33e pue JZZ 'suapze~ goznq~ ~Cq pauMO IT~uazzno d;zadozd aq; ;o uoi~zod azoe-8Z auk sazznboe zauMp ;T ~C~zadozd ai~~ uo subzs uoZ.{d oM~ aneq ~Cew zauMp 'ubTS pzeoq zapeaz oTUOZ~oaja burobazo; ar;~ buipnZoui •uetd za~sew at;~ uT paT;i~uapT uoT~eooZ ubTs uoT~Cd aZgissTwzad e ut (ubTS ~S~T~uapT ZeoT~zan zoCew) ubTS uot~Cd e uo (zauMp ~Iq pazTSap ;T 'papTS-atgnop) pzeoq zapeaz oTUOZ~oaja ajgeabuet;o abzet auo ;o uoi~ezado pue uoT~oiu~suoo MotZe tZeus ~C~T,~ aqy •su T$ uoT d :pzeog zapeag otuoz~oatg •Z Yd ~TUn buiZZaMp jetquapisaz zad 6b'95£ 9~-b8~$ pue azoe ZaTOZawwoo zad 08•ZS£$ aq o~ pagewT~sa j~uazzno aze ~oaCozd auq uo s~uawssasse tenuue a~ebazbbe ,s~oTZ~siQ adeospuez aqy •~~z~ aq~ uT sxze pue 6uTdeospuet ueTpaw uT~z; Tj ~aaz~s ;o aoueua~uiew q~iM pa~eTOOSSe s~soo ;o azeus zie; ski ~Ced oq s~oTS~szQ adeospueZ pue u~T, ~gbT7 ~C~i~ aTgeoijdde aq~ o~uT xauue ttegs ~oaCozd aq~ --a,E. •sxze pue puetsi ueipaw ;o uoT; aoxa ar;~ q~iM uT eospue tZe SITe~SITEw jjTM ~oa,ozd aqy (atgeozZdde ;T '~CeM ;o ~gbTZ sues;jet buzpntouz) s~aazgs oiTgnd ;o dTuszauMO awnsse jjegs ~oTZas-rp zejiwzs zo bui~gbzj pue buTdeospuej tC~T,~ e zo ~~i~ •seazy a eospueZ pazTnbaz se 'saTOUabe Tezapag zo a~e~g 'jeooZ zai~go pue uoT~e~zodsuezy ~ ~ U y3Ff27Q DRAFT the Property if the Church Gardens, LLC property is not acquired by Owner or an affiliate of Owner. In addition, in consideration of Owner's commitment to contribute to the operat3.ng budget of the performing arts theater under Section 303 of the DDA, Owner shall have the non- exclusive right in perpetuity to maintain a Protect identity scan in a prominent position on the fly tower portion of the theater building, of a size and >_n a location reasonably approved by the City. M. # Community Event Programming. Owner shall meet not less than twice annually with City representatives to discuss proposals by either City or Owner to provide entertainment, festivals or other community events of mutual benefit to Owner and City periodically at locations within the Property. Except as otherwise provided in the Project Approvals, Owner shall be required to obtain Temporary Use Permits for special events in accordance with the Applicable Rules. City shall cooperate in processing combined Temporary Use Permits for the annual or semi-annual calendar of events discussed above in this paragraph No Temporary Use Permit shall be required for sidewalk sales on private property by merchants at the Protect. N. Municipal Services• Public Safety Office. A- Except as otherwise agreed in writing by City and Owner, City will provide police, fire, and other municipal services to the Property on the same terms and to the same extent as other commercial and residential properties in the GyZ -Z~ 83966 8 1 9 01/15/02 l~J r~ DRAFT City. The City acknowledges (i) that in planning its own security program, Owner Is relying on a municipal police presence at the Proiect; and (ii) that the quality and availability of ~-e City services, including but not limited to police services, are critical to making the ~==.=`_ Proiect a success for Owner and the community at large. Concurrent with the opening of Phase I of the Proiect, and continuing for the life of the Proiect, Owner will provide to the Citv, without rental charges of any nature, up to 2,000 square feet of enclosed building space for a public safety office within the general retail sector of the Project. Owner . shall provide, at Owner's expense, the initial "build out" of basic interior improvements for the space, including restrooms, a public counter, ceiling lights, air conditioning, partition walls and doors for interior offices, 110v electrical outlets, and carnet or linoleum floor coverings. Owner will provide eight (8) reserved parking stalls for use by the substation. All equipment, furnishing, staffing and operating costa of the public safety office and other City police services to the Proiect will be at the City's sole expense. Owner shall maintain, repair and replace at Owner's expense as necessary the exterior walls, roof and parking spaces. City shall be solely responsible to maintain, repair and replace at City's expense all interior areas, doors, windows fixtures, furnishings and equipment. G, u,z - z~ 83966 8 2 0 01/15/02 ZO/SS/SO j z 8 996£8 ~~-s~~ • 'azn~dZnos 'ssejb paure~s 'sazn~Ea; za~eM 'burdEOSpuEj abe~izau ;o ~srsuoo AEw puE zauMp ~Cq pa~JaZas aq jjrM s~uawaTa Jr}ST~.ZFj •LIEjd zagsE~ aq~ q~rM ~ua~szsuoo s~uawaja or~si~ze 'szo~isrn puE suoz~ed o~ aZgrssaooE suor~eoot ui '~oaCozd ar;~ o~ui a~EZOdzoour TZEus zauMo •;z~ Jitgnd 'Z5 wezbozg 6uuo~iuoy; uorgebr~iW aq~ i[~TM aouepzoooE ur sbuzptinq ~Cq atgissaooE ~Ctgeuoseaz SiIOi~EJOj uz s~aaz~s ui paprnozd aq jjZM saurZ or~do zagr; azngn; zo; ~rnpuo~ •~rnpuo~ ot~ o zagr3 'd 8 'MEj ZEZapa; atgeozTddE zapun pazrnbaz ~ua~xa aq~ o~ ~o~ . BaT~TjTgesrQ q~rM sueoizaw~ aq~ q~rM .{jdwoo ttegs goaCozd aq~ ur sai~zZroE; zaq~o puE saouEZ~ua buipjznq 's~CEMu~ed uErz~sapad 's~aaz~s ZEUZa~ui •~o~ sai~rZzgesrQ q~iM suEOizaw~ 'O d saZn~ atgEOrjddy aq~ ggiM aouepzoooe ui squawaszngwiaz ~sOJ puE saa; bur~ipadxa jEUOZ~rppe s~Ced zauMo qEu~ paptnozd 'sasez;d ~uawdotanap puE ~yuawdotanap -azd s,~oaCozg aq~ 6uiznp suotgoun; burssaoozd ~uawdojanap zaq~o puE xoago uejd ur bur;;Eqs ZEUOrgippe apinozd o~ s~ue~tnsuoo uzE~az jjeus ~~i~ aq~ 'awi~ o~ awi~ woz; ~sanbaz s,zauMp ~~ dotanap oq aTgisea; aJaCozg aq; burxew ;o zed teoi~ uo a azE saoinzas buigrpadxa puE burssaoozd ~;a;ES puE 6uipTinq 'buruuetd zau~o puE xJauo uEjd ;Eq~ sazzubooaz zaq~zn; ~qi~ auy . ydK~Q LO/SL/ZO z Z 8 996 E8 L z- 1 /H paprnozd sEu zauMp (i) 3r za3suez~ eons 3o a3Ep anr~oa33a au3 03 3uanbasgns buisrzE pazza3suez3 os '3oazau3 uor3zod zo '.Z~zadozg • au3 03 3oadsaz q~rra 3uawaazb~ srq~ zapun suoi3EbrTgo sir woz; paseaTaz aq jZEus zauN,p '~C3zadozg auk ;o uor3zod ~CuE zo TjE ;0 3uawubrssE zo za3suEZ3 'aZES aq3 puE suoz3Ebitgo puE sar3np jZE 3o uoi3EbaTap aq~ uodn •za;suEZy uo R saz3tjrgerZ •3uawaaz6~ szg3 ;o wza3 aq3 buiznp awry ~CuE 3E uoszad ~CuE o3 ~{~zadozd au3 buiszzdwoo ~C3zadozd jEaz au3 ;o suor3zod zo jjE za3suez3 zo ubrssE 'Tjas o3 3ubzz aq3 anEq jtEgs zauMp •u rss~ o~ 3q t2t •s~uawu rss~ puE sza3suezy •puEt aq3 g3rM buruunz s3ueuanoo a3n~r~suoo TZEgs ~uawaazb~ sit; 3o suoisinozd aq3 ;o Zjy •subrssE puE szossaoons 'sziau anz3oadsaz ziar;3 puE . sai3zad aq3 30 3r;auaq aq3 03 aznui TTEus puE 'zanaos~EuM zauuEw ~CuE ut zo MEj ;o uor3EZado ~iq zag3agtn 'urazag3 3saza3ur ~CuE zo ';oazag3 uoi3zod ~CuE zo '~3zadozd aq~ burzinboE suoszad zaq~o jjE puE 'saassaj 'sani3E~uasazdaz 'szo3EZ3sruiwpE 'saasrnap 'sLIbrssE puE (asrM3aLj~0 z0 LIOr~EpTjOSLIO~ 'LIOT~EZTLIEFS02S 'zabzaw Aq) szossaoons 'szrat; anr3oadsaz zraq~ puE sat3zEd auk uodn buzpuiq aq jZEgs 3uawaazb~ sru3 ur paurE~uoo suor3EbiZgo puE s~uauanoo 'swza~ 'spzapuE3s 'szaMOd 's~ubiz 's3uawaazbE 'suorsinozd aq3 3o TZFI •puEZ aq3 g3Zen ung s~uEUano~ sxois=noxa ~s~o sazn3Ea3 ubtsap puE sxzoM3zE zau3o zo 'buined ani3EZOOap 'subrs ~uawnuow jE~uawauzo .L3FRIQ • DRAFT • to City ten days' written notice of such transfer and (ii) the transferee has agreed in writing to be subject to all of the provisions hereof applicable to the portion of the Property so transferred. Upon any transfer of any portion of the Property and the express assumption of Owner's obligations under this Agreement by such transferee, City agrees to look solely to the transferee for compliance by such transferee with the provisions of this Agreement as such provisions relate to the portion of the Property acquired by such transferee. A default by any transferee shall only affect that portion of the Property owned by such transferee and shall not cancel or diminish in any way Owner's rights hereunder with respect to any portion of the Property not owned by such transferee. The transferee shall be responsible for the reporting and annual review requirements relating to the portion of the Property owned by such transferee, and any amendment to this Agreement between City and a transferee shall only affect the portion of the Property owned by such transferee. Mortgagee Protection. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Owner, in any manner, at Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering the Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. City acknowledges that the lender(s) providing such financing may require certain Agreement . interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request, from ~ T -Z $ 83966 8 2 3 01/15/02 ZO/ST/TO ~ Z 8 996EB ;o stIOT~EbijgO lCIE;auow zo s;jne;ap ~CuE zo; atgEiT aq aabeb;zo[ni eons ZjEus Juana ou ui 'zanaMOu 'papinozd :;uawaazb~ stuff ;o swza; auk o~ ;oaCgns ';oazau~ zed zo '~C~zadoza au; axe; ijEus 'aznsojoazo; cans ;o naij ui paap zo '~snz~ ;o paap zo abeb~zow auk ;o aznsojoazo; o~ ;uensznd ';oazau~ ;zed ~CuE zo '~I~zadozd aq; ;o uoissassod o;ui sawoo ouM aabeb;zoW qu'a' '£ •~uawaazb~ siu; zapun ~;zed eons paMOjjE poizad azno buiuiEwaz au; buiznp ;jnE;ap auk azno o; 'uoi~Ebijgo aq; you ~nq '~ubrz au2 anEu ZjEus aabeb~zoW auy •zauMp o; ;jnE;ap ;o aoi~ou auk buipuas ;o s~Cep ua~ zSTu~iM aabEb~zoW aq; o~ aoi;ou ~Eu~ ;o ~Cdoo e apinozd ZjEus ~~ZJ ';uawaazb~ sit;; ;o swza~ au; zapun zauMp o~ uani6 ~jne;ap ;o aoi~ou Cue ;o ~Cdoo E bui;sanbaz aabeb;zo[o1 E woz; ~sanbaz E saniaoaz ~Cjawi; ~'~iJ ;I •Z anjEn zo; pue u~ie; pooh u,: apew ~C;zadoza auq uo ~snz~ ;o paap zo abeb;zow .due ;o uaij auk ztedwi zo 'usiuiwip 'pijEnui zapuaz ';ea;ap ijeus ~uawaazb~ siu; ;o uoeazq E zou ~uawaazb~ siu; out buiza;ua zau;zaN 'T :sabajinizd pue s;ubzz buiMOjjo; au; o; paj;i;ua aq ZjEus ~;zadoz3 auk ;o („aabEb~zoW„) ;snz~ ;o paap a ;o ~{.zEtoi;auaq E zo abeb~zow E ;o aabeb~zow ~Ctri{ •;uawaazbt~ siuq ;o sasodznd puE ;ua~ui au; u;iM qua;sisuoo si not;EOi;ipow zo uoi~e~azdza;uz lions papinozd uo,:~EOi;ipow zo uoigE~azdza;ui pa~sanbaz eons ~tuE o; ~uasuoo s;i pjouu;iM .Cjgeuoseazun ;ou jjTM ~~i,7 •uoi~EOi;,:pow zo uoi~e~azdzaqui zo; ;sanbaz eons Cue u;iE; poob ui a;Ei~obau o; (s)zapuaj eons ;o sani~e~uasazdaz puE zauMp u~iM ;aaw o~ 'awi~ o; awi; ydFf2iQ zo/si/LO S Z B 996E8 / ~ o~ - 1 h ail; wo.z; s~CEp .C~ziLI; ;o poizad E zo; ~uawaa.zb~ stag ;o uoisinozd . zo wzaq ~CuE wzo;.tad o~ zauMp zo ~;ip ~Cq azntiEg • ~jnE;aQ !~'~i,7 aq~ ;o ;ZEgaq uo wawa;E;s Lions iCLIE a~noaxa o~ pazzzoit;nE aq jZEiis zabeuEy.I ~;ip ally •~;zEd bui;sanbaz aril ;o aouEwzo;.tad aii~ ur s~ZnE;ap paznoun ou azE azaii; ]Eii~ puE uor~EOr;ipow ~noLi~zM boa;;a puE aozo; ZTn; ur si ;uawaazb~ siii~ ;Eu~ ;uawagE~s Lions zaniTap o; sjiE; LiozLiM ~{;zEd aii~ uodn anisntouoo aq TZEiis awl; Lions uzLi~iM ;uawa~E;s Lions zanitap o; aznjiE; ally •pa~sanbaz iIOi~EW30;LIT atgeuoseaz tali;o iCuE (£) puE 's;jnE;ap Lions ~CuE ;o azn;EU puE sa;Ep ail; bui~C;loads zo ~uawaazb~ siii~ zapun s;ZnE;ap paznoun ;uaz.zno ou azE a.zaii; (z) :suoi~EOi;ipow Lions ;o a.zn~EU puE a~Ep aiiq bui~E~s puE 'pat;tpow sE ';oa;;a puE aozo; Tin; ui sz ~uawaazb~ siq~ qEi;~ 'o~azaii suoi;EOi;ipow . uaaq anEii azaii~ ;i '.zo boa;;a puE aozo; ZTn; ui puE pal;ipowun si ~uawaazb~ sill; (T) :abpaZMOUx s,~C;sEd .tali;o aii~ o; ;ELj~ bui~C;i~zao ;uawa~E~s E ~t~zEd bui~sanbaz ail; o~ zanijap puE agnoaxa jtEiis tai;;o aiiq 'awi~ oq awl; woz; axEw dEw ((s)zapuat s,zauMp zo) zauMp zo ~qzp .zaii~ia LioigM ~sanbaz ua;;rzM ~CuE buiMOTTo; s~CEp ~~Siii~ utLtgiM •aouEZT wop ;o ~uawa~EgS •d;tp o~ pied uaaq anEli aabEb~zoW Lions ~Cq pazinboE ';oazaii; uoi~.zod zo '~C;zadozg aiiq so; ~uawaa.zb~ siiiq zapun anp suot;Ebztgo ~C.zEgauow .zaiigo puE sea; ;uazzno puE ~uanbuiZap jjE ji~un a~EOi;i;zao ~iouednooo zo ;iwzad buipjrnq E o; paZ~i~ua aq you jjEiis subtssE .zo szossaoons ski zo aabEbgzoini Lions ~CuE ~Eii~ ;daoxa 'aabeb;zo[ri Lions .Cq ~C~sado.zd aii~ o~ at~i~ ;o uoi;isznboE o; .zozzd buisizE .zauMp a3t~zra • DRAFT receipt of written notice thereof from the other shall constitute a default under this Agreement, subject to extensions of time by mutual consent in writing. Said notice shall specify 3.n detail the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which said default may be satisfactorily cured. If the nature of the alleged default is such that it cannot reasonably be cured within such 30-day period, the commencement of the cure within such time period and the diligent prosecution to completion of the cure shall be deemed a cure within such period. Subject to the foregoing, after notice and expiration • of the 30-day period without cure, the notifying party, at its option, may institute legal proceedings pursuant to this Agreement and/or give notice of intent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section 65868. Following such notice of intent to terminate, the matter shall be scheduled for consideration and review by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga within thirty calendar days in the manner set forth in Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Following consideration of the evidence presented in said review before the City Council and a determination that a default exists, the party alleging the default by the other party may give written notice of termination of this Agreement to the other party. Annual Review. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1, throughout the term of this Agreement, good faith 83966 8 26 ai/is/oz DRAFT compliance with the terms of this Agreement by Owner shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting next following each annual anniversary of the Effective Date. If as a result of such review, City reasonably determines, on the basis of substantial evidence presented at such meeting, that Owner has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions hereof, City shall provide written notice thereof ("Notice of Non-Compliance"), stating in specific detail and specific reasons for such finding. After City delivers the Notice of Non-Compliance, Owner shall have the right to cure such non-compliance as provided in Section V.E. above. In the . event that Owner does not timely cure the non-compliance after a Notice of Non-Compliance is delivered by City or, 3.f during the period which Owner must cure such default, Owner ceases to make reasonable efforts to effect such cure, City may proceed to terminate this Agreement on ten days' prior written notice to Owner 1n accordance with the termination procedure set forth in Section V.E. above. Default by City. In the event City defaults (as defined in Section V.E. herein) under the terms of this Agreement, Owner shall have all rights and remedies provided herein or under applicable law, including the specific performance of this Agreement. Legal Action. Any party may, in addition to any other . rights or remedies specified herein, institute legal action to 83966 8 2 7 01/15/02 ZO/SL/LO 8 z 8 996£8 ~~-I ~N •uoT~n~Tasuo~ ETLI.ZO;TjE,'~ aq~ ;o ZZ not;oag '9 aZoT;z~ o~ ;uansznd pa;utoddE abpnC A.zEZOdwa; E pazapTSUOo aq jjEgs •g•n uoi~oag siL~; o; ;uensznd pa~oaTas aaza;az ~Su~ saT~zEd aq~ ~Cq ~CTTEnba auzoq aq ~CjjET;zuz TZEL{s burpaaoozd gons ;o ;soo aqy •p~g uoT;oag aznpaoozg ZTnT~ ;o apo~ o~ ~uansznd pa~uroddE auo anEq o~ xaas ~CEw ~C~zad zaq;za 'o~azaq .C;zEd zaq;Ta ~Cq os op o; ;sanbaz ua~;TZM E ;o s~CEp ua~ uTLj~TM aaza;az E uo aazbE o~ aZgaun azE rC~i~ puE zauMO 3I 'STi9 puE bb9 suoi;oag aznpaooza jzni~ ;o apo~ uz paptnozd sE jEaddE o; ~oaCgns aq ZTEt;s puE ~zno~ zoizadng au; ~Cq paza~ua aq TZEgs ;uawbpnC aqy •aaza;az gons azo;aq ~Cszanoz;uoo aL~~ ;o saouE~swnozTo au; zapun a;EUdozddE ;aitaz atgE;inba puE ZEbat "[jE anssi puE uoazaq~ ;uawbpnC puE buipui; E ~zodaz puE 'MEj zo DoE; . ;o zaq;aqM 'sanssi TTE d.z~ uaq~ jjEgs oqM aaza;az atbuis E uodn aazbE ZjEgs ~~iJ puE zauMp •sa~ndsTp ~S~zadozd jEaz puE asn puET 6uTnZosaz uz aouaTZadxa anEq ZTEgs aaza;az pa;oaTas aLI~ ~Eq~ papznozd 'stEadd~ ;o ~zno~ sa~E~g pa~TUn aL;~ zo ;zno~ ~oiz~siQ sa~E~g pa;Tun aL;~ 'jEadd*d ;o ;zno~ ETUZO;TjEJ aq; '~zno~ zoTSadng .C~unoJ ouipzeuzag uEg aL{; zaL~;Ta woz; abpnC pazz;az E aq ZZEgs oqM aaza;az E ~Cq pzsaq aq jTEL;s suoz;oE jEbat jjE '•~ ~a 'g~9 uoT~oag aznpaooz3 jinz~ ;o apo~ o~ ;uEnszng o~azau sai~zed aq; ;o s~L;biz puE suoT;EbiTgo auk aouEwzo;zad oT;Toads ~Cq aozo;ua zo ';oazaq LIOT~EjOTn pa~dwa;;E zo paua;Eazu; puE uTOCua 'urazaL; ;uawaazbE zo ;ueuanoo tCUE aozo;ua ';ZnE;ap ~CuE ~Cpawaz zo ;oazzoo 'azno y.~~zra • DRAFT Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by City or Owner to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement, irrespective of the length of time for which such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of the right to demand strict compliance with this Agreement in the future. No waiver by City or Owner of a default or breach of any other party shall be effective or binding upon 3.t unless made in writing, and no such waiver shall be implied from any omission by City or Owner to take any action with respect to such default or breach. No express written waiver of any defaults or breach shall affect any other default or breach, or cover any other period of time, other than any default or breach and/or period of time specified in such express waiver. One or more written waivers of a default or breach under any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any subsequent default or breach, and the performance of the same or any other term or provision contained in this Agreement. Subject to notice of default and opportunity to cure under Section V.E., all of the remedies permitted or available under this Agreement, at law or in equity, shall be cumulative and alternative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right or remedy. Future Litigation Expenses. Payment to Prevailing Party. If City or Owner brings an action or proceeding (including, without limitation, any ~, y, ' - ~y • 83966 8 2 9 01/15/02 ZO/SS/TO ~ £' B 996£8 ~~- ~ ~ ~ ai~~ azo3aq zo uo ssauisnq zo3 pauado puE pa~aTdwoo uaaq Sou . sET; (anogE sZE~roag aq~ uz paui3ap se) 3oaCozg aq~ 3o I asEgg 3z EbuowEOn~ ogouEg 30 ~C~r~ aq~ 3o jrounoJ ~3i~ aq~ 3o a3on ~~izoCEw .Cq uor~EUrwza~ a~Erpawwr o~ 3oaCgns aq tjaus wzay aq~ ~euq 'zanaMOu 'paprnozd :a~EQ am ;oa33g ar;~ 3o I.zaszanruuE (u~p~) q~ar~zo3 aq~ Tr~un a~EQ anr~oa33g aq~ woz3 a4 iiET~s („wzay„ aq~) ;uawaazb~ 3uawdojanaQ siu~ 3o uoi~EZnp aq3 'sai~zEd aq~ 30 ~uasuoo ZEn~nw .~q zo ~uawaazb~ srq~ uz T~3zo3 3as saouE~swnozio ~Cq papua~xa zo pai3rpow 'pa~EUrwza~ asiMZaq~o sr ~uawaazb~{ sru~ 30 (paur3ap za~3EUZazaq se) „wzay„ az;~ ssatun •wzay •~uawaazb~ szgq uo ~uawbpnC ~CuE o3ui ~uawaazb~+ sru~ 30 zabzaw aq~ anrn.zns ZTEgs puE jEZanas puE a~EZedas sr uorsrnozd siT.iy •~uawbpnC aq~ aozo3ua zo 3oattoo o~ sburpaaoozd ~uawbpnC -sod !GYBE ur pazznour saa3 ,s.Cauzo~~E sir o~ pat~z~ua aq jjEgs • ~insMEt ~CuE ui ~3zad burtrenazd at;~ '~S~zad burZtEnazd aq~ o~ saa3 ,s~Cauzo;~E 3o pzEME burobazo3 at;~ o~ uoz~ippE ui •uot~oE eons T~~rM uor~oauuoo ur pazznour sasuadxa puE s~soo aZgauoseaz zar~~o jjE o~ pat3i~ua aq jZET;s saa3 ,s~Cauzo~~E o~ patgz~ua ~{~z2d E 'uoi~ippE uz 'puE ZEaddE ~CuE uo saa3 ,s~Cauzo~~E apntouz jiEt;s uoi~oag sii~~ zapun saa3 ,s~Cauzo~~~ •saag 3o a oog •saa3 ssau~tM gzadxa puE saa3 ,s~Cauzo~~E atgauosEaz 'off pa~twij you ~nq 'buipnjour stns 3o sasuadxa puE s~soo sqi o~ paT~i~ua aq TjEgs buipaaoozd zo uoz3oE r~ons ui ~C~zed burjrEnazd aq~ '~uawaazb~ siu3 30 3no bursrzE aszMZat;~o zo 's~oE snorazo~ 'sagoBazq 'sgZnE3ap 3o uossaz ~Cq (wiEto ~Cgzad-pzru~ zo 'wrEtoza3unoo '~uiEtdwoo-ssozo 'asnEO Mogs oq zapzo 'uoigow y3FlNQ DRAFT seventh (7th) anniversary of the Effective Date, plus any period of force majeure extension applicable under this Agreement. Upon request by the then owner of the Property or any portion thereof following expiration or termination of the Term, the City shall execute such documents as are necessary to remove this Agreement from title. This Agreement shall impose no obligations with respect to any single family residential lot and such lot shall be released from any obligations pursuant to this Agreement, without the execution or recordation of any further document, when a certificate of occupancy has been issued for the building(s) on the lot. Permitted Delays; Supersedure by Subsequent Laws. Permitted Delays. In addition to any specific provisions of this Agreement, performance of obligations hereunder shall be excused and the Term of this Agreement shall be similarly extended during any period of delay caused at any time by reason of: acts of God such as floods, earthquakes, fires, or similar catastrophes; wars, riots or similar hostilities; strikes and other labor difficulties beyond the party's control (including the party's employment force); the enactment of new laws or restrictions imposed or mandated by other governmental or quasi-governmental entities preventing this Agreement from being implemented; litigation involving this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Future Approvals or the Ministerial Approvals, which directly or indirectly delays any ~~~ J3~ 83966 e 3 1 01/15/02 lJ • ZO/SS/ZO z £ 8 996E8 ~~- c ~ ~ '89859 pue L9859 suoz~oag apo~ ;uawuzano~ ;o suorsrnozd aq~ q~rM aouapzoooa ur • ';uawaaz6~ sru; o~ sar~zad aq~ ;o ~uasuoo Tan~nw .Cq awry o; awry woz; papuawa aq .Cew ~uawaazb~ srgy •~uawaaz ~ ;o ;uawpuaw~ ~uawaazb~ sru; ;o suorsrnozd au; u;TM aouerTdwoo sapnToazd MeT Mau eons t;orgM 6urznp porzad aq~ ;o uor;aznp aq; zo; papua~xa aq Caw ~uawaazb~ siu~ ;o wza~ auk 'uoz~do aTos s,zauMp ;y ;oa;;a pue aozo; TTn; ui pue par;rpowun urawas TTags ~uawaazbE{ srr;~ 'Tn;ssaoons sr abuaTTago gons Juana aq~ ur pue '~uawaaz6~ stuff ;o swza; auk q~rM aouaridwoo bur~uanazd MeT Mau auk abuaTTauo o~ ~gbrz auk anau TTegs ~C~r~ zo/pue zaurnp •~uawaazb~ srq~ ;o ~ua~ur pue sasodznd auk uo anew pTnoM uorsuadsns zo uoz~aor;rpow gons ;oa;;a aq~ uo pasaq uorsuadsns zo uor~eor;tpow gons ~Iua ;o ~~rTrgrsaa; auk aurwza~ap o; q;ie; poob ut za;uoo pue ;aaw TTags zauMp pue ~~i~ 'MET Mau eons Cue ;o uor~ebinwozd zo ~uaw;oaua zap;e ATa~arpawwi •MeT Mau gons q~rM ~CTdwoo o~ ILzassaoau aq Aew se papuadsns zo par;rpow aq 'aTgrsaa; ;ua~xa aq~ o~ 'TTags ;uawaazb~ srr;; ;o suorsrnosd aq~ uaq; ';uawaazb~ szgq ;o suorsrnozd azow zo auo q;iM aoueridwoo sapnioazd zo s~uanazd a~aa anr~oa;;g aq; zap;e pa~oaua zo apaw 'MeT a~e~s zo Tazapa; Cue ;I •sMaZ qua asgng q aznpasza ng paura~zaosa uaaq sag awes aq; zap;a aTgissod se uoos sa zapunazaq ~aiap ~Cua ;o ~C~zed zaq;o aq~ ~;r~ou ~CT~dwozd TTags zauMp pue ~~r~ •Toz~uoo s,~C;zed aq; puo~Caq sasnao zau~o zo :wstuagoaw buroueuz; zaq~o zo QdJ aq~ ;o uoigawzo; zo spuoq ;o aouanssr aq~ ur ~CeTap 'zapunazaq pa~eTdwa;uoo ~C~rnr~oa y3'd2IQ . DRAFT Operating Memoranda. The provisions of this Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between City and Owner and the refinements and further development of the Project may demonstrate that clarifications are appropriate with respect to the details of performance of City and Owner. If and when, from time to time, during the term of this Agreement, City and Owner agree that such clarifications are necessary or appropriate, they shall effectuate such clarifications through operating memoranda approved by City and Owner, which, after execution by City and Owner, shall be attached hereto and shall be binding on the parties hereto. No such operating memoranda shall constitute an amendment to this Agreement requiring public • notice or hearing. The City Attorney and City Manager shall be authorized to make the determination whether a requested clarification may be effectuated pursuant to this Section or whether the requested clarification is of such a character to constitute an amendment hereof pursuant to Section V.M. The City Manager may execute any operating memoranda hereunder without City Council action. MISCELLANEOIIS. Negation of Partnership. The Project constitutes private development, neither City nor Owner is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and City and Owner are independent entities with respect to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. None of the terms or provisions of this . Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between or ~{~ i -3 B 83966 e 3 3 of/is/oz . DRAFT among the parties in the businesses of Owner, the affairs of City, or otherwise, nor shall it cause them to be considered joint venturers or members of any joint enterprise. No Third Party Beneficiary; Application to Church Gardena Property. This Agreement is not intended, nor shall it be construed, to create any third-party beneficiary rights in any person who is not a party, unless expressly otherwise provided. City and Owner acknowledge that the easterly approximately 18 acres of the Property ("Church Gardens Parcels") are currently owned by Church Gardens, LLC, but are subject to the terms of an Option Agreement dated November 15, 2000 ("Option") in favor of Forest City Development California, Inc. ("FCD") • Pursuant to the terms of the Option, City agrees that any Project Approvals heretofore or hereafter requested by Owner or FCD shall be effective with respect to the Church Gardens Parcels only upon the close of escrow for acquisition of the Church Gardens Parcels by Owner, FCD or their designee. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. ~/, T --~~ 83966 8 3 4 01/15/02 ZO/SS/SO S £ 8 996£8 . Lj~iM 'pa~sanbaz ~diaoaz uzn~az 'jiEw pai;i~zao zo 'paza~sibaz Iq awes aij~ buzpuas ~Cq zo uoszad ui awes aq~ buuanzjap ~Cq uanib puE bui~izM ui aq jjEgs aoz~ou dui •saoi~oN ETLI.ZO;ijE,'~ ;o a~E~g auk ;o sMEZ aq~ L[~iM aouepzoooE uz paozo;ua puE panz~suoo aq ZTEgs ~uawaazb~{ srgy •MErj atgEOij FI ~uawaazb~ sit; ;o uoi~E~azdza~uz zo uoi~onz~suoo puE boa;;E you TjEt;s puE ~Cjuo aouazuanuoo zo; pa~zasui aze sbuipeaggns puE sbutpeaq uoi~oas Tim •s uzpeaH uot~oag •ESZan aoin zo 'szapuab za~nau zo auiuiwa; auk apnjoui ZZEgs zapuab auiZnosEw auk puE 'ESZan aotn puE jEZntd aq~ apntoui ZTEgs zEtnbuis aq~ '~xa~uoo aqq ~Cq pazinbaz zanazagM •sasodznd puE sani~oaCgo aq~ anaigoe o~ zapzo ut • ';oazaq suozsinozd aq~ L(~iM ~ua~szsuoo puE tC~i~ zo zauMp ~suiebE zo zo; ~CZ~oiz~s you puE butueaw uowwoo zzaq~ o~ butpzoooE aTogM a se panz~suoo aq jjEus o~azaq s~igit.Ixg aq~ puE ~uawaazb~+ siu~ ;o suoisinozd auy •~uawaaz +~ ;o uoi~onz~suo~ •o~azaq sai~zed aq~ ;o suoi~ebitgo puE s~gbiz auk puE ~uawaazb~ siq~ ;o sasodznd auk a~EZ~snz; ptnoM zo saouegswnozio at;~ iie zapun atge~znbaui zo aTgeuoseazun aq pjnoM 'pa~EpitEnui os se 'quawaazb~ siq~ ;o ~uawaozo;ua ssaTun 'boa;;a puE aozo; ttn; ui uiEwaz ttegs awes auk puE 'aouE~swnozio zo uoszad zaq~o ~CuE o~ ;oazatj~ LIOT~E~ijddE aq~ zo ;oazaq suoisinozd zaggo ar~~ ;o ~{uE boa;;E ICEM ou ui TTEus zapzo ~znoo zo ~uawbpnC ~Cq 'uoszad puE o~ ;oazaq~ uOT~E~i'[ddE aq~ ;o zo '~uawaazbci siu~ ui pauiE~uoo suoisznozd au; ;o due ;o uoi;epitenul ~iZigEZanag . .L3Fl2iCl DRAFT postage prepaid, by overnight delivery, or by facsimile to the respective mailing addresses, as follows: City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Attention: City Manager Facsimile: (909) 477-2849 Copy to: Richards, Watson Attorneys at Law Number One Civic P. O. Box 1059 Brea, CA 92822-L Attention: James Facsimile: (714) & Gershon Center Circle )59 L. Markman, Esq. 990-6230 Owner: Forest City Development California, Inc. 949 S. Hope Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90015 Attention: Mr. Brian Jones & Mr. Colm Macken Facsimile: (213) 488-9308 Forest City Enterprises, Inc. 1160 Terminal Tower, 50 Public Square Cleveland, Ohio 44113-2203 Attention: William M. Warren, General Counsel Facsimile: (216) 263-6206 Lewis Investment Company, LLC c/o Lewis Operating Corp. 1156 N. Mountain Avenue P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-6070 Attention: Mr. John Goodman Facsimile: (909) 949-6700 Copy to: Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. 300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attention: Joshua C. Gottheim, Esq. Facsimile: (213) 687-2149 83966 8 l~,l '`~/ 36 of/is/oz zo/sr/zo 8 996 E8 ~~ ~ ~ /~ ~ i ~uawnz~sur .zo ;uawaa.zbe ';oe.z~uoo zau;o Niue ur zo M2T dq paprnozd ~;zea pa;etag due so zauMp o; ajgeortdde .Z~rjrgerT uo uor;e;rwrj Cue '3o uor;e~rwrj ur you pue 'o; uoi;ippe ur aze uor;oag srq~ ur paprnozd .C;rjrgerZ ;o suor;e;rwrj aqy •;uawaa3b~ stq; q;rM uoi;oauuoo ur pa~noaxa sa;;eazaq zo azo3o;asaq ;uawnz~sui so ~uawnoop zau;o .Cue zo ~uawaazb~ srq~ q~rM not;oauuoo uz sai;zed pa;ejag auk ;o Cue ;suzebe atgeTrene aq ;ou pue sabpaTMOUxoe ~Iga.zau ~~TJ ;zTigeiZ 3o uor;e~rwr7 ;oazaq uoz;zpuoo pus wza; ~C.zana pue goea 3o pue ~uawaazb~ siq; 3o aouassa au; ;o sr awry •aouassg au; 3o si away ajiwzsoe; zo jjrq .xte ';diaoa.z • tteus asznooaz pus ;uawaazb~ srq~ .zapun 'dj~oazzpui zo .Ct~oazrp L£ 'iC~tjrgerj Zeuoszad Cue aneq („sar;zed pa;ejag„) zauMp 30 ;uabe .zo anr~e;uasazdaz 'zabeuew 'a;eijz;;e 'zau;zed 'aaAojdwa 'zagwaw 'zapjogazeus 'zo~oazrp 'zaor33o azn~n; zo ;sed '~uasazd Cue ZTeus ;uana ou ui put •~•Z•Z '~-suapze~ ezzo;orn ;o asou; .CZatos aze ;uawaa.z6~ siq~ zapun suoz;ebzjgo s,sauMp ~eq~ saazbe uzn;az aq; uo uMOus a;ep ~C.zanrjap pa~dwa~;e zo a;ep .LzaniZap aq; uo zo pa;oa33a sr ~t.zanrtap teuoszad a;ep aq; ;o zatjzea aq~ uo pa;eorunwwoo zo apew 'paniaoaz 'uanzb pawaap aq ttegs ~uawaazbF{ siq; zapun saor;ou iZK •pa;oa33a sr abuego eons a~ep au; o; .zoud s~Cep ua; ;seat ;e uiazag papznozd zauuew aq; ui zag;o au; o; abuego gons ;o aoi;ou ua;;rzM burnrb ~Cq awz; due ;e zagwnu xe; zo~puB ssasppe burtrew s;r abuego ~{ew zauenp zo .C;r~ zag;rg .L3F1?IQ . DRAFT Recordation In order to comply with Section 65868.5 of the Government Code, the parties do hereby direct the City Clerk to record a copy of this Agreement against the Property with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County wathin ten (10) days after the Effective Date. • 83966 8 ~, ~ -- ~3 38 of/is/oz DRAFT • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and City have executed this Agreement as of the date first hereinabove written. "City" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation By: ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Approved as to Form: By: City Attorney "Owner" VICTORIA GARDENS-C, L.L.C., a California limited Liability company By: FC VICTORIA GARDENS, INC., a California Corporation, its Administrative Member By: President By: Lewis Investment Company, LLC, a California limited liability company, its Member By:_ Name• Title: 83966 8 3 9 01/15/02 • • 20/SI/SO S~- ~~ TN~ 8 996EB i oTTgnd ~CzE~oN jEas jEraT33o puE puEq ~Cw SS3N.LIM '~LIawn.Z'~SLIT LI Tit~TM aq~ pa~noaxa 'pa~oE (s)uoszad aq~ qo?qM 30 3TEuaq uodn .C~r~ua arT~ zo '(s)uoszad auk ~uawnz~suT aq~ uo (s)azn~EUb?s z?at;~~zaq/sTu ~Cq ~Eij} puE ' (saT)~C~TOEdEo paz?zoq~nE zTar~~~zaq~sTu uT awes at;~ pa~noaxa Iaq~~ags/aq ~EL[~ aw o~ pabpaTMOUxoE puE ~uawnz~suT uTu~TM auk o~ pagTZOSgns azE~s? (s)awEU asogM (s)uoszad aq~ aq o~ (aouapTna rCzo~oE3s?~Es 3o srsaq az;~ uo aw o~ panozd zo) aw o~ uMOUx .CTTEUOSZad 'a~E~S puE .C~unoO p?ES zo3 puE uT o?Tgnd aq~ 'aw azo3aq 'ZOOZ ~Z ' pazeaddE rCTTEUOSZad ~CzE~oN E 'paubzszapun uO ( 30 .CI.NROJ •ss ( EiIN2iO3ITdJ 30 SSKSS o?T4nd dzE~oN (?) TEas TE?o?33o puE puEt; tCw SSSN.LIM •~uawnz~suT LITL[~TM auk pa~noaxa 'pa~oE (s)uoszad aq~ uoTL.IM ;0 3iEgaq uodn ~~r~ua aq~ zo '(s)uoszad aq~ ~uawnz~su? at;~ uo (s) azn~EUbTS z?aq~~zaq/s?t; ~Cq ~Eq~ puE ' (saT).C~TOEdEo paz?zot;~nE zTaq~~zarT~sTZ; uT awES aq~ pa~noaxa ~Caq~~at;s/aq ~EL.[~ aw o~ pabpaTMOUxoE puE ~uawnz~suT uTCi~rM auk o~ paq?zosgns azE/sT (s)aweu asogM (s)uoszad aq~ aq o~ (aouap?na .{zo~oE;sT~Es ;o sTSEq aq~ uo aw o~ panozd zo) aw o~ uMOUX ~CTTEUOSZad pazeaddE ~CTTEUOSZad 'a~E~S puE d~unoJ pTES zo3 puE u? o?Tgnd ~.zE~oN E 'paubTSZapun aq~ 'aw azo3aq 'ZOOZ ~B6-Z uO ( 30 ASNf1OJ •ss ( FIIN2IO3I'I~'J 30 3ZFfSS SdF~XQ • • DRAFT EXHIBIT "B" ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN & VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT r~ LJ ~, ~l~ .l - ``7 83966 a Exhibit B of/3s/oz DRAFT EXHIBIT "D" APPLICABLE FEES [FEES TO BE LIMITED PER E.N.A AND PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS] • 83966 a Exhibit D of/is/oz DRAFT EXHIBIT "E" 83966 8 MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL T - S° / ~,- Exhibit E of/is/oz DRAFT RECORDING REQUESTED BY RECORDING FEES EXEMPT DUE TO AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. 300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attn: Joshua C. Gottheim, Esq. (Space Above Line For Recorder's Use Only) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VICTORIA GARDENS-C, L.L.C. • ~~ ~/ ~ ~ / ai/is/oz DRAFT • SECTION VI2. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section I. DEFINITIONS ........................................ 5 Section II. BENEFITS TO CITY ................................... 6 Section III. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ................................ 7 A. Permitted Uses ....................................... 7 B. Rules, Regulations and Official Policies ............. 7 1. Applicable Rules ................................... 7 2. Conflicting Enactments ............................. 8 3. Setbacks, Design Guidelines, Landscape Guidelines and Park Improvements ................ 8 C. Future Approvals ..................................... 9 D. Permitted Fees ...................................... 10 • E. Permitted Conditions ................................ 10 F. Term of Map(s) and Other Project Approvals .......... 11 G. Timing of Development ............................... 11 H. Moratorium .......................................... 12 I. Vesting of Owner's Rights ........................... 12 J. Infrastructure Capacity ............................. 13 K. Infrastructure Phasing Flexibility .................. 13 L. Development Agreement/Project Approvals ............. 13 Section IV. COOPERATION/IMPLEMENTATION ........................ 13 A. Further Assurances; Covenant to Sign Documents ...... 14 B. Public Financing of Improvements .............. ..... 14 D. Processing During Third Party Litigation............ 14 ~/ ~/ T r ~~ i of/is/oz DRAFT E. State, Federal or Case Law .......................... 15 F. Other Governmental Bodies ........................... 15 G. Defense of Agreement ................................ 16 H. Design/Development Standards ........................ 16 I. Day Creek Channel ................................... 17 J. Condemnation ........................................ 17 T...~v~~.•~...~...4 nl .. 7 ^I K. ~~,,-~~-^~--r-- - -------- - --- ._. - L+Lan scape Areas ............... . S'CR7G1Z}}}~~~r~~~T~~"['[-II~1~~. n....l....-....1. .]..F: ~....] a . L. Electronic Reader Board; Pylon Signs ................ 17 A9. . ,..,~.,,....,,. r r,.-,,, ~ a M. Community Event Pro4ramming ......................... 18 N. Municipal Services; Public Safetv Office ............ 19 O. Americans with Disabilities Act ..................... 20 P. Fiber Optic Conduit ................................. 20 SL• Public Art .......................................... 21 Section V. GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................ 22 A. Covenants Run with the Land ......................... 22 B. Transfers and Assignments ........................... 22 1 Right to Assign ................................... 22 2. Liabilities Upon Transfer ......................... 22 C. Mortgagee Protection ................................ 23 D. Statement of Compliance ............................. 25 E. Default ...........................................25 r ~ F. Annual Review ....................................... 26 G. Default by City ..................................... 27 T -S~ F~~. -- DRAFT H. Legal Action ........................................27 I. Waiver; Remedies Cumulative .........................29 J. Future Litigation Expenses .......................... 29 1. Payment to Prevailing Party ....................... 29 2. Scope of Fees ..................................... 30 K. Term ................................................30 L. Permitted Delays; Supersedure by Subsequent Laws .... 31 1. Permitted Delays .................................. 31 2. Supersedure by Subsequent Laws ....................32 M. Amendment of Agreement .............................. 32 N. Operating Memoranda .................................33 Section VI. MISCELLANEOUS ..................................... 33 A. Negation of Partnership ............................. 33 B. No Third Party Beneficiary .......................... 34 C. Entire Agreement .................................... 34 D. Severability ........................................ 35 E. Construction of Agreement ........................... 35 F. Section Headings .................................... 35 G. Applicable Law ......................................35 H. Notices .............................................35 I. Time is of the Essence ..............................37 J. Limitation of Liability ............. ...............37 K. Recordation ......................................... 38 ~,ia ~-sy ~.~J L. J iii a~n5io2 ~ DA 01-02 VC PA 01-01 TPM 15716 MASTER PLAN (Transmitted Separately) ~ EXHIBIT "B" C~,z -~ ~E X~ m y. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~i ?^: ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~°SsS ~z~~~~ag3g ~ ~ W 4~A ~ x ~a$' ~a~~~~s V ~ !~ e~wl ~ao~~; z °i ~F $ ~W~ z3; ~ ~ ~ b. F ~ ~~ ~ w ~ ~~ F = ~~• ~ r `\ ~- V ~ ;9,iil _ i!!ll~ °s ;:•; a , E3~~ ,~~ ~ '~ ~ ° ~~~~ ~ `a~ ~ g4$ pp 3 OS~ t it ~ ~ ~~ S~g 9a ~ °, t ~.p} a '! 9 l~~A ~~ ~~~~ ~t~ 8A69 €'~~ 9?~3 s ~~! ~ 9~ Sit€~ h R k3~ ~~~~ ~ i3~ ~~ c"~ ~€ ~ ~~~[ ~~~~ tt ~ ~~ ~~~ 4 i~! ~ {]{8i{9~e$~ ~YYY ~~ yA& • ~'i ~~e a g33~313~~~~~~~ ~~ {~6~~ a~ff4i~9 E~~~~~~~~~@d~E~ ~~~ ,T-s~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ e ~~z< O 8~ [. ~ ~~ ~' ~~~ ~ ~ s 6 ~p °'^ ~ ~ ~ @~ p ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~6¢~ z~~7~'k~ A, z ~a~a ~ ~ a ~~~~ z~a ~g~ ~~~ ~~~ ~a"~~r' ~a~ q~q~ , ~ aBE~ ': w > ~~ F ~~ ; Q ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ #1 [r ~ ~a~ tl) • ,'.,' _~~ \~`~ i ~~ ~ \ \ Ln N T '~ ~l ~~~ .~ ~~~~~ ~00~~~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lil~' ~~pG' ~ e W~e; ~~I_ ~~N~~ a~ p ~~ w 6 S 71 F u! is~ iW! ~ ..... !!9!!l77H577S99B!!!Sl999l779! ~ ...._...._..._.r........,. ~>a a ~,z~..-} ~ . err- ~ ~~~ !7!7!!!!S!!S!5S99Sl9lSlS!!!9!7 f ~Rt~A~R®0~00~~tp~Y~~~ !79!°.!Sl97S!!!l77SS7777l93l779 ' w~nm:wnosnnanvm !9Sl7fl79!!7!!!5795!l7777l99397 ' _~._.. '~ I 7 9i~, i. COMMERCIAL 3UBDMSION PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.15716 VICTORIA GARDENS N 1FE qfY OF MNCIp CIICAMdlfi^ COINIY OF eMl B@NAFpIp, HUIE OF CALFOfNA B[N0 A N1®IMf1N1 a fYt65 m TPNCI SE pCW9YL a fMGR 1W p ilNl ,Lf RII YY fqm N NpR 102 a fYLQ YVy Al fIGLY Al TIMIM 100 IIWIIIIFI f4C6 YN NA T¢ IM1m N pa ql a fNC6 YVy AT fA00 1 lINN10N) NO IOIIiMb a NDCS 'Y a EIIIMIb WIg1Y 4105 tl fP YN ¢MW N N1011 z fAa •1 WfO. ALL ¢falOf a LN N]IWNNI eNNrr mrz a a01E0pXIA ~~' ]001 100J0 Attm - IA 101! J ~~ l ~I ;'p ~~g a O f0106PC1LL PI¢N0 (MryAR) Y)b~ MRIM. EIC11116 o O sNEO (PUV.rzI ~ :rz1Er (PO¢10) FOREST CITY D E V[ L O P Y F M i MfUT11gR.N610 IGIMggG MY n01N WOM~s ~~ ~~ u PARCEL MAP COYILBiCIAL H1EflIVI610N PNif8 YAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0.13716 VICTORIA GARDENS SHEET 3 OF 15 ~.o..e.e..m,m..__~o_...~ ~~ ~'= 9 Q ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~¢~ z ~ ~ ==~G ~. ~ A ~~~~ ~ a ~~~ W ~ ~ ~~; v ~ ~ ~~L~ F a ~~°~~~~ U s~ w R,~ ;$ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ I g~~ ~ ~ Vy ,,,!:~: ~~za os k ~ ~ i~,iu : a e N ~0~0~0 ~ ~ o ~g~~ ~ o~ ~ F~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ i ~~~ ~, 1'~IE /I Lnllull~~nnuul~llinnln J ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ III ii I II I i~l; I I J ,, /~\ I ~ 1 qY I '.II i ~ II IU ///';`~`~\ ~ 1~~1~`l~ I ~I~I~illlllll~ll"~11 1 \~ ~~ ~/ r , ' g i ,~ ~~;', l_i,i Il ~~~ \,`/~i ~i / ~ %,! ~/~' i ~/ ~ ~f ,~ ~ p~; l~G -SS '~ ~~~ ~. ,~~ ~~ ~ ; , ~illllllllllllr ~I~ ~_~ -~ _ ~ ~_{._ ~ - I 1 - --------- rl 4~B 0 ~ - _ i [~ :p dd p ~..I ~g~ 9 { - _ Chi ~ ~ ~'~ '1- ~ . Z ~= k I I ~~ i ~ ~ ~~~~ 1 1 W F 1 W ~ ~ ~flw~ ~ .{ I _ ao~~~' I i ~~ ~ I ~ 7~ ' a .- `I a ~ 8~ ~ { Ja~~a~~ = G6Y ~ ~I` i '° ~ ,~ ! 5 ~ V' ~lilii ~dZ~y~ ~~~ ~~~0~0 ~ o ~~~~ ~ ~~I ~ ~ ~ 5 N I I liv II IU I~'I I' ',~ \ rln~n~l~.nlr~~ _ J I ~ I I ,~ ' ~~ ~~ ~~. ~~~ ~ ~~ ~. ;, . ;~ `. \ ~ `.. ~ `ii '~ ~`~ ~~ ~~ \ . \ ~. \~~ \ \~ ~~ L ~.'~. ~ ~\ ~~, ,, ~ ~ ,\ . ~~~ ~ ~\~ a ~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~~ \ ~ \ \\ `~ ~ m ~, ~~''~:~ ~~~~ , ~~ . ~ (~ =~ `~~ ~ '. -'-~--~-1c's}-H- 1! I I ~ ~ I I ~~'~ ~ ~' u11111Iluluu~6~ ? a 8 !~ ~~ I ' ~ I I I I~ I I 1,~1 Illrh i ~ !~ J~ I tl lll'I~IIIIL f ., I. i < I I. pp ~ ~ .I ! _ ~ .,_ 1 y- ;' ~ ~' - ~~ ~" ~~ r ~ 1.1 ,I; II L. ~I 1 I 0 Illil I 'rt~il~ll ~' ~ ~ `~~`~~~~'`"y ""~~~~~y 'I I ~ III ~I~I~Iflllll'I;II 1 ~ ~ ~ l i l lilli, lill ~ ~ ~ a"9 ~--~, ~j ' ~~~ j I ' n I "~I I I ~ , , ~~ 117 I ~ I '+-~ • COMMERCIAL SUBDMSION PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.15716 VICTORIA GARDENS N 11E CRY OF RAIICFq CUCA~ICHOti OOIMY OF BN! BHNAfO~q. HfAIE OF CAIFdfNA ENM% A AWAMFIM DI PMD[IS SO IMdIGX M pLLIIM DT PNFFL YN XD 1981 q RII WV IXID N MqF IYI M tMCa YVf AT PIGO~yNry[TyYWNI i00 NOLS1E. PMLII LLV X0. >•q f~ N NIR q M PYR61Wf Ai PM:ES 1 TYIMFH J M Of~gPl. Ml QLO ~> •fYl ptDEYF00~~ ffu REa CYIOMK Dqm M NIDR l PqF u i t-- _ , err a ''~ l• - I ;` ;`~' ~g I I ~ii~Fi, imm-m-rtt 11 1 - DI j JO ~ ~ ss J ' I i7(1~1 Ir~It.~irtl i~tITI I i ~R i i i I; 10.21 AF Uf7 NC ~ - '~; MI /iC. Ih j 7P' I I LtJ~I l 11 ~106~YI I~~L 11 1 1 ~ i i ,I~ ~ wn¢ cus 2 I ~ ~ I I '~ uc lamm_ 'Ij O - f Y r- ~ :' ~~ - i d- ~ '--y I ( I 11 i I( ~- a, I i ~ GT(u1T~~TR~ 1 ~~'} ~ - ~! ~ ainAC ~t I ~ii~ as - aw i j e _ < s :. I I I T 1 Li i +~ I - I I - ;i ; - O <d01OX.LL II ~ IT j j (11LL111llW1 I) ~~ aw Ae. ~ i ui AO' 11L1 W1l 0 .AF~w (nYArq H II ,i x tTTTTITfTTTTT ; ; N v ~ m PYFUF sran~i I i i ~ a.u Ae. r 111ll111111LtL11f 1 !' on •a 1 ; aae~~e. °'~° Q ( '(III i ~° ~ 11 ~'; vL _,.--- y I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ mar revf Arz) ~ ~~~ I i - -- - ~ ~ - -r 1 I II~ __~_.~ ~ .~ I 1 ~ AG ` ! ~ T I III i.li Ia ~ ~~ ~~~ .O, } ~ O.f! AC. DEV~OPBi .I' „ ~' ~ T~rnmrrr'~r , a. _ . ,~ FORESTGTY I I ~~ i I LIJ.EAgL}aLLL 1p 1 `` 'j' 0 p AO' ~ I~ i 3 ', i i v / D E V E L O P Y F X r pp~'.~ II "'~ Il pl -„I ~j t (~ .,~ r` I'~I / , L snawnnrma.m Xe gl I I - ~. y l , ~ Iy I i`r ,+ nwam~mumw,. BB rAC tY~nmm i Inl I I tLW1J1.1L11111.1 '' _ ~ ?' ' ~ r i pI I ~ ~ _ ~nrrrrtnrmmn~ ; ' ' _ - - I _ 11 n li~rm . , ~ 1, ~ m i ell ~i i I i ((~1J1WJ11llLI1lltLLl111L111iJ Iaj zm Ac ~, - am Ac ~ r11111 I I I I I I = UTt1Ti1Tb~TfTTITIITTI ttT1 1 a/e Vic. ~' Tf ~ / 1~1TtTl ill I I t~ ea d 1~ III ;~ ' (11L111t1W111111 1 I'• ! ~~ t. `.S till 1(1 ~ flllll _ iii ' I (T77Tl1TTfITTfT17RiT111 ) ore Aa .1 _ ~ RTfI ~°.e,.m. III II ~lllllllit111 LU1Lll1LLLLl- 1 _~•.r=-i-~~ - -~1lll~llllrlll`jillU' I /_111L ~'~0f~----- III ~; - ---'-'t''-T-- Xt-jil~ ___~_~~-,A(- ~ „, "~ ' ` ~' ._.., III II III II TTTIf1f(1 ' 1 ~ `' ~ I ' III I - I ~ _ - I -` ; '1. ,' ~' ~Y I ~ I I it - _ ,) I I• = _ _ _ `~ -,> - PARCEL MAP ~ I I ~ I -- ~ i I - _ ~~ ~ - COA/~6iCU1L 9187NBION PARCH AAAP III I I - J I - ~ - - ~ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. L5716 I ~ I l I I _ _ _- _ _ ~ . ~' ,'- (, ` ~ < ~ I = - - . _ .. _ ~ _ I, ~ ~" 4~`~ ' _~ SHEET 6G OF 15 e~ air ~ ~.v~.~~.s-...,~,~,°°"~: I I ~~~ ~ ~ ~_ ;,~ ~~oa o~ e U; ~9i,1; dzv ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~. ~~ i~ ~ ~~ tn,E ~ ~ _ ~e E~ ® dU ~~~~~0 ~ ° s~~~ ~ of ~ E~ 5 ~ ~ i B 118 ~B I ~ 6 ,_, Tfl~RT~ ~ Th ~ - F 1 \ \ // \~ I ~ I 1~ I, Ullli'f111~F7~fT ~ .~ ~ I II I. ~ ^~ r t..-.~ 1.t tl ir+ll tl ..\ ill I LL < Y ~b O gg ,511; 3 ~ ~ ~~3: ~ rte- ~ .1 .y ~~~~ \ ~ ~ r rlr ~ 3 ~ ~ y 1 ~ -~ ~ ' ''' Z OC A~ i ~ I 1 _ Ali I ii~~~ ~~ b~ _ 1 .~, ~~ • b ~ ~ ~, Y' ~ 1- ~~ I I I I ~~R"• ~ - --- ' _ - _`~_ II it , O .b ~ -- -- _ 9 - - I . 4 r il' L~.I 8~ _ _ t _ r ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~ ~ I I I 1 a ~r ~ ~ Il~ill ter 111 f 1 i ~~,,` Wa Ili 11~ li Y ~~~; TATR7~~~~ ;. ~ i t ~ _x 1 I ~ I In1117111raIrlr ` '` 8 W ~ •~ f , ~ ~1 -~~~~ ~ ~ -' ' I,~ i I I ~ E,,,, :~b~ ~ nm~~ ~ ~ I~ ~g'r _ -_ _- ~'~~ II _ _-``N may. i °~~1 ~'~/._ ~_~_~~.~JI II _ _ i _ ~ I~ 1 1, TT~T~~' I' `~~ ~~\~\\~1~~~}!! ~ S G ~3' C ~ I 1 ~ll 114 ~ I I I i t ''_ I HIIU ~ ~~I _ ill Iditf;l 111 11 'It' ~~'ll ~`~II mil ~ tuJlll'IIIIIIIIutII'~ ~i l i i I I II I i I ' ' ; I I "~ V: ~ ~I "~Ill~ ~ 111~~1 II g i ;I ~ i ~ ~~ I f C{ ~ ~ ~i~ i 11 _ L_LttJJJlI I ~ I a . - - - - __ __ - __- _ ~ ___ _ _ ___ `c '~-'~~ __ __ - i "_____°'~^A0~-X110_____ ______--~ - ~ ~-'__ I ~ \' lb9Sl ON ~ ~T- P {\~ - I ; dtliV -BONVd ~\~I i I I~I~1 I I ~ ~~ T - ~a- ;, ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ oao .` u ^..a 9 ~ R ~ ~ ~~ , ti ~ ~ ~~s~ ~ ~z~~~~K a ~`, w ~~~~ ~ € Q~a~$~~~ ~~°~ ~a~s ~~° ~~~ 8~ ~ ~ > ~~~ ~€ ~ ~ ~~~~ F z ~6~ Yi ~I i i ~,,\\ ~ ,~, ~\ ;\~ ~~`\ ~`~ ~ ~ ., \, \ \~ \\~. \~\ ~\ '~,~~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ \~\, '. ~ \ ~ '\ ,._ ~~~ ,~~ ~ ~ V ~ l~ ~ ~@y ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~, \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \1 , a (`~ ~~ ~~ . ~ V v `~~ „ , \\ ~.~ ,~ \ ~ ` c ~+e ~e ~,N,~ -~~ n i C~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' ' ° I~'i~~_ ~~0~ IL ;i ,~ o U ;a; ~~~~ ~~ ~C UW A ~ - ~ 8 4 5~~~ ~}- 1`-\' _~ ~~_ --_'~_ _7- l .~ yy i o3~z ~ ~~ w `~ r` ~ I1: ~ ~°a 0 ~ ~ = 1 ail ~d LL ~ iJ; ;dLf ~ ~~ O 9 ' i C W'd,~ vO ~e I !~ ~ W i ~~ sly ~~ ~ w ~ ~ ~.e~~1° ~ ol~® ~ ~~ ! it a~; gg .= 1 ~ e = it ~i ~~ _-~ ~~ ,_ - _ -. ~ ,` ,- .tom _«i, =~-~ i=l~j-~~t~~i.`-°~ ~ `~i . ~~ ~-_ ~ ~ g ~_~ 3 s 0 <~c ~b - Y a~ W a~~~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ r !~ , z ~ °a ~~$ ' ~ ~ 9 ! a ~a11~ ~ ,~~~~~; ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 • 0 ~ pb 1 p4 ~ _ g b s .q®y n J QI ~ -~ a R~ a ~~ + a ~1 IUw n 1 n 1+1 S~~ i R ~~,,, ~~~ ~a as ~~ ~a ~a ~ a`^~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ 6~~ a a ' ' ' ° ! ° I ' 1 ~ ~ a ~ _ 961 a~ ~ 6I ~ it ~ ii ~ 91 ~ a~ ~~ a a 6 i a ~_ h tt ~~ a a~ ~ a a ~~ 1 as ba ~ _ ~~ is ~ a .. ~~ ~~ ~ z -~ ~ COMMERCIAL 3UBDMSION PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.15716 VICTORIA GARDENS N 7FE CrtY OF flANCFp CUCPAg1Aq COINfY OF 8M! ems, efAlE OF CALFOHIA MYD A JD90MfNM M fYK[L! 10 1NMILH J{ MEW4/E Df f1RYt YY 1M1 ISNI AJ NE Y.V IYJ- N p.11 IfJ K .Y41 YVJ Al ~.10E~fyfJSry[1,XNICN IDO NgYfryF~ fMEp yy YD )fN (YJp N NMIM N Df fNID6 WA AT Nf.O 1 )IRDIG J M K~YV3. 4L REdNJ Df SW b0YI1pY0 DdMIT Sf)AANiEJ DE CYIOMN. N tlDY L 1b[ N DnJnnlq, Jnnl • L~c_ two Am - to inn ~F ~,~.~r Nvna~w{vaNm ~n{ ~~ ~ry` A 1 ~,' FOREST CITY D E V F l D Y Y E M i {mm~v~o{¢Jm im wu,mm.u Nx) ILbB'NT am~e ~~ ti.ssr~r,w~ C~ ~~ nu .. u Ct)IA+BMJIIL 811001V1810H PMCB AMP ! TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.15716 VICTORIA GARDENS ~~ =A--•---~ SHEET 10 OF 15 ='<a ~~~ ~ g~~. ~i ~ ~ ~_~ z ~ ~ ~~~! a, w ~~~I o ~ Q ~~€! ,~ ~ ~ ~~,~ W Q ~ ~~,,; ~, ~~°~~~~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~-~. $ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ }. - ~ ` ~ ~i€ ~ ~ ~ ; 6~~! O W fia 6~1 ~ ,• u ;; m ~W ~~z~ d~~ ~a Cp~ ~ o~. v ~5 i ~ $~ e~ o ~~ '~ i'i A W S a 6 C_J ~ r:: ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' W ~z~ ~ ' ~,~~, p.z ~ ~ o ~9 ~ ~3 z~a ~ ~~$ W ~~ ; ~ ~ aa ~r ~~j m ~a° U a a W > ~' ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ • }. ~ ~ j ; e~~~°j€ e €ge~s i~i (~y ~ ~ ~) ~ W s~°zc ~~~U ra. ~~ s ~5 O i~ ~ ~~ ~~ 6 L=~ iEl~iflfEff~,, +~ ,_-f,--~- -~ _., -t -,L,~_ ~~~~ I~y_ _~ z ~~ i~_ _ ~~ ~~1' 3iE'' ~'II~_~_I~Ei~w= ! ~~ A _ ~ - ,- ~~~, iii U ° ~~i ; ~~n~ ~ E~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ I ~ i ti~~~ ~ # ~ ~W~''~a d °a tL c~~za O ~~ e 6~~ ~'~. ~o w~ ~~~5 ~ e e ~ 6 m ~ dl~~ m U 7 E =^y:@@ ~i BBqqi ~ r~~ O' ~ ~.~ U - .~ ~ ~ A ~~ z~a~~~ ~a~~~~~ UQ~~~w', z ~ ~~°~_~~ pw F a ~ i W ~ s~: ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ g~~ 9 Q u ~~~~~ ~~~ ,`~ • ,,; -* ~'-_~' 0 ,.,~~1=i~G~~ ~ 7.i 9 rl ~~ 4 ~ ~~~~ ~ O ~ r~~~ ~ Z~~7:~G ~ w ~~~~ ~a~g~ ~W~~~~Y~ ~~°~~~ a v 8~ ~ ~' ~'~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ U ~ ~$ _ ~a` 6' y ~~ I I t I I ~ i ~~ ~~ g ~~ a. p ii 3 II I ~} ~~ i~ ~ ~ I "• '~11i I I ~ ~(~ i ~Y ~ ~ I /' ~' I I ~ ~ +i I ~, z i w~;eh I/'1 ~' 2 ~ W i ~~ } . W s - ~ ~,,!i ~,~r~ o U . ~ ;11111 I 6 ~ N e ~' : ~ Ca ~ 6 , ~ > E 43~~ ~6 • W ~ O W 6 as td U D -~~ r~ S f ~-i OETAL T • ~ T ~ i ~ ~~r / ~~ i ~ I~}i i~ ~' i ~ I! i I I i i i OEfAL 'O' COMMERCIAL SUBDMSION PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.15716 VICTORIA GARDENS N 1FE CRY OF MMGq CUCAUONOi~ CWIIY aF BIM ~lWpp, BfA7E OF CALFCRLI ama • ]urdvmax or rA]cru m mawx u EE]Y9K K rum YIJ N0. ~SM~ AS rR Yb ram 01 E00[ in Of r]NL Y]n Al rACE]n TN]~OpWI 100 MRYSM. rMC6 YV MD TN 16m M !Oq{ ]0 K rYCEL YY] AI r1r00 1 n ~ ; r/LE ]A Of YVS. IILNL RWIO)! Or Lrll a]O0IM000 CAMY ff~] R]Of CYfOEX ~~ M o®rmE ]wl rwo A®- in um y DETAL ~ K r. _~i~ ('ip,i,~;~i~!illii~~" ~@Ct1111~ji{AI 1 ~" ~, `~~~- III, ~!~~/' i~iiillilll,"ifilli,`I1111F~,. C~_~f-" ~j~j~ , C~' ~~rM ]m]ee ~aeo Nrewa.e.r _-_- __ OEV~OPHi FOREST CITY 0 E V E L O Y Y E N T wrmuni~veEr-mw uawmau rrr nvpe pm.w,s Ewt P,nw•fJi ~~ QK®~~ 1 ruuA""_r ' FIRE TRUCH &SEMI-TRAILER TURNIIVG RADIUS OOM]61g11L !)ll~NISgN PARCa MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.15716 VICTORIA GARDENS sHEET 15 of 15 s • AMENDMENT ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT JANUARY 18, 2002 SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT AND LEWIS OPERATING COMPANY \~ VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN D~~ PREPARED BY FIELD PAOLI ARCHITECTS G~, -~ - ~~ VICTORIA COMM[JNI'fY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 INTRODUCTION This document is an Amendment to the Victoria Community Plan which is within the Villaj:e of Victoria Arbors of the Ciri of Rancho Cucamonga, California. This amendment is dated January 18 2002 and is amending the Victoria Community Plan Amendment, dated October 2 2000 which was prepared by PDS West of San Juan Capistrano, California. The current amendment assumes that the October 2000 amendment was adopted by the Citv Amendments aze included for text and eraphics The amended text is underlined and the amended j?saphics are noted in the text and are attached • The amendments to the Victoria Community Plan have been made by Field Paoli Architects of San Francisco, California, and are submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonca by Forest Citv Development and Lewis Operating; Company The submittal of this document, V:ctor:a Community Plan -Amendment is made rn conjunction wrth the submrttal of the Victorea Gardens Master Plan dated January 18 2002. ~~_7 -7~- ~ ~ Page 1. C~ VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Januazy 18, 2002 Page 26 -Area 4 Area 4, Victona Arbors, will be a unique, multi-use community which features a lineaz boulevazd/pedestrian way that ties a historic winery to acentrally-located schooUpazk to new downtown with a town squaze and village green. Page 27 Graphic - An Interrelated Community of Villages C. CREATE ACOMMUNITY-WIDE OPEN SPACE SYSTEM - A "LINEAR PARK" THAT TIES THE VILLAGES TOGETHER AND CONNECTS TO THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CITY AND COUNTY OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS. Victona Lineaz Park will connect each of the Villages' central open spaces and, in turn, connect the residential portions of the community together In most of the villages, the pazk will have a n~stio, natural feeling: informal tree masses and naturalized shrubs and grasses, meandering pedestrian and bicycle trazls will run the entrre length, providing a framework for community activity. The open-space system will terminate in Victona Arbors whose key element is a landscaped boulevazd spore which connects a historic vmeyazd, centrally-located pazk/school site, and regional downtown with a main street, town green and central town square. Page 28 -Graphic -Victoria Linear Park Drawing Page 2 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 D. CREATE A RECREATIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM THAT ENCOURAGES PEDESTRLAN, BICYCLE AND EQUESTRIAN CIRCULATION A system of trails will weave throughout the community, connecting residential areas to one another, and to the community open space system. The trails will connect the community with the regional open space and trail system along Day Creek and Deer Creek Page 29 -Graphic -Community Trail System (amended and attached) The trail system will take vanous forms: sometimes along roads, between different land uses, through residential azeas, or within open space corridors. It is a system which is adapted to its particulaz location, yet ties together as as uninterrupted connecting system. The Community Trail System diagram shows conceptually how the open space and trail system will work to accomplish this. Page 31-Graphic -Local Circulation (amended and attached) Page 3. ~,u,z- 7~ • W BAb ELINE ROAD ~ S` `1J north ~ ` j ~-~.~ ~~~^ ArOOr Lane Tral Leefl Trill Ciry Tnil - Radsltle Lrse <~ Day Crrea Blyd. Sera/e & ReereelMa Cerritlsr 7nU le Epieeater Dey CreeY CYaaori Trill CONIlVIU1vITY TRAIL SYSTEM • ~y,~T -7~ VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 Page 34 -Tent -Section G G. CREATE AN OVERALL LANDSCAPED URBAN ENVIRONMENT WHICH IS PERCEIVED AND USED AS A SPECIAL PLACE BY THE RESIDENTS AND VISITORS OF VICTORIA, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND THE REGION The special landscape quality of Victoria will be created by using the established vocabulary throughout the new community. The windrow style of planting -trees with a vertical growing habit that aze planted in a closely spaced, linear pattern -will be found throughout Victona as "special boulevards", adjacent to utility corridors, and weaving through res~dentral azeas as part of the trail system. The naturalized landscape character of Victoria Lmeaz Pazk is an extension and enrichment of the nLStrc quality that pervades the planning area. The landscaped boulevazd/pedestnan spine m Victona Arbors is an mtportant new element of the plan that provides the connectron between the residential azeas and the schooUpazk with the new downtown to the south and the historic winery to the north. Page 37 -The Victoria Community Land Use Plan THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY LAND USE PLAN On the following pages is the land use plan for the planning azea. On this diagram, the integrative open space elements that umfy the residential and commercial uses of each village have been illustrated Victona Groves, V~ctona Vineyazds and Victona Page 4. ~, ~, Z - 77 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 Windrows each have amulti-use commumty facility as the central village amenity. Victoria Lineaz Park Imks these open spaces together and provides one continuous pedestrian and bicycle trail system for the entire community. The terminus of Victoria Lineaz Pazk is in the Village of Victoria Arbors, where it connects to a landscaped boulevazd/pedestnan spme, which in tum connects the historic winery to the pazklschool site and ends as a Town Green and Town Square within the new downtown. The downtown is named V~ctona Gazdens. This central activity and transportation spme will provide multiple connections The primary connection is from the restored winery to the downtown Secondary connections include• residential to residential neighborhoods; residential to the pazk/school site; and residential to the commercial and regional downtown. Arbor Lane is the name of the road that incorporates the Victoria Lmeaz Pazk as it connects the Town Green and Town Squae of Victona Gazdens with the neighborhoods, pazks and winery to the north. On the Town Green a City cultural center is planned, which is to include a children's theater and a library. As the spme or boulevard enters the mixed use, downtown azea of offices, restaurants and civic uses, it becomes the Town Green. The linear pazk then proceeds to the Town Square, the most urban feature of the open space corridor, located within the new downtown. Access to this open space comdor is provided by a series of pedestrian ways and generous, landscaped sidewalks, and is complemented with accented intersections and crosswalks. Page 5. ~~1Z-7~ VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 Page 37 -Regional Downtown REGIONAL DOWNTOWN The focus of urban activity within the Victona Commumty is the regional mixed-use center within Victona Arbors -amain street shopping area surrounded by civic, commercial and residential uses The name of this new, mixed-use downtown is Victona Gazdens. The downtown will feature retail uses of regional and commumty interest in a landscaped Mam Street settin with a Town Squaze and a Town Green. The downtown azea will feature enhanced pedestrian amemties, pocket pazks, public transportation, and potentially, a shuttle system from pazking lots to the Main Streets and from the Main Streets to the winery and residential and park uses along Arbor Lane. Surrounding the regional center will be related rmxed uses of commercial businesses, offices, a City cultural center, and residential uses of varying densities. This hierazchy of uses will provide a balance of commercral activities within Victona and Rancho Cucamonga that encourage a more interesting and diverse city and promote the conservation of energy and natural resources by placing facilities close to people who will be using them. At the time the first development plan is submitted for commercial mixed use and residential mixed use, a Master Plan with development standazds and design guidelines shall be established Page 39 -Graphic -Victoria Arbors -Land Use (amended and attached) n U Page b VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 Pages 73 to 100 -The Village of Victoria Arbors THE VILLAGE OF VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE CONCEPT The Village of Victoria Arbors is mold-use community thematically tied to its historic winery and containing a centrally located neighborhood schooUpazk and an adjacent regional retail downtown. The historic winery at the north of the community should provide the village with its thematic identity, with a "vineyard buffer" that both separates and connects the winery with the village. The village will incorporate landscape references to the viticulture history and incorporate element that nurror "wine country" character in its streetscapes and entries and will use street names evoking "wine country" and the area's rich agncultural hentage. The design, azclutecture and choice of materials should work to enforce this theme of "wine country." This character is evoked not only in Rancho Cucamonga's history, but in other wine regions, including Napa and Sonoma Valleys, and those of France and other parts of Europe These areas should be a source of inspiration in design and development of Victoria Arbors. The use of vines on building walls and trellises is encouraged. The use of smooth, hand-trowelled-fimsh stucco, and stone as building wall material is appropnate. Stone, including cobble, field and quarry, could be included in exterior wall design, alone or in combination with smooth stucco finish. Wrought iron could be an appropnate material for use in walls and fencing, gates, trim and balustrades. Page 7. ~,~,~ - ~~ VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 To solidify the identity of Victoria Arbors, all residential architecture shall incorporate either or both a porch and trellis. These two architectural elements will become an architectural icon for this village. Trellises should be a part of entry monumentation, street furniture; and pedestrian ways Trellises can take many forms including long shaded walkways, building appurtenances, sculptural accents and gazebos. Architectural styles appropnate for residential uses in this village include Monterey, Craftsman, Bungalow and other traditional forms typical of agrarian and viticulture areas. No barrel file roofing matenal will be allowed. No Santa Bazbara style azcltecture will be allowed. A Master Plan will be required as part of the first Tentative Map submittal, in compliance with the General Plan and Development Code, which will include more detailed design guidelines and exemplary photographs The residential portion of the village will have a mix of housing types and will be oriented around an elementary school, an adjacent neighborhood park, with a multi- purpose building shazed with the school, an amphitheater and plaza, and a small wetlands pazk. Victona Arbors will transition in hierarchy of intensity from the winery and its buffer, to single family residential focused aoound the school/pazk; to multi family residential and mixed commerciaUcivic/office use with the regional retail of the new downtown, Victoria Gazdens. The area to the west of Day Creek Boulevard will transition southerly from single family residential to multi-family housing to commercial uses, all fronted along Day Creek Boulevard by mixed use. A Master Plan for Victoria Gardens shall include a development concept showing a transition from the relatively low-intensity residential land uses to the somewhat more intense, mixed- use nature of the new downtown. Page 8. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California • January 18, 2002 The parcel of land north of Church Street, abutting Etiwanda Avenue rs de-annexed from the Ehwanda Specific Plan and becomes part of the Victoria Community Plan. A strip of land, 150 ft. in depth, adjacent to Etiwanda Ave., will be developed with lazge lots comparable to those existing on Etiwanda Ave. The homes on these lots will face Etiwanda, but will be accessed from the Victoria Arbors residential area behind them. This strip of land and its lots will continue to be subject to all provisions, development requirements, and design guidelines in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. In this way, the integrity of the Etiwanda Specific Plan will be maintained, since Etiwanda Avenue forms the western most visual edge of the Specific Plan area. A generous system of both regronal and village-scale trails and walkways with greenways wrth a central boulevazd/pedestrian spine, will provide easy access to the commumty, the retail azea, and recreaUOn/open-space amenities within the village. The greenways will also provide resrdents and visitors with pedestrian-scale amenities such as benches, picnic tables and trash receptacles. This trail system will link the village to the adjoining community and a potential shuttle system, which will take customers from parking to the "Main Street" area of downtown, and could also provide access from the turnazound near the winery to residential neighborhoods and the pazk, and to the regional downtown. A central transportation node is planned for the regional downtown to provide access from within and outside of the Village. U P e . ~, l~, Z - ~'.~ VICTORIA COMMiJNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 • VILLAGE ENTRIES The major access points to Victoria Arbors will contain lazge setbacks and generously landscaped entry statements with ties to regional trails (see "Trails and Entry Plan"). The most dramatic entry will be at the northeast comer of the village where Arbor Lane enters the community at Base Line Road ("specral entry"). Here, the generously landscaped lane will be continued with a wide lineaz pazkway along the west side of Victoria Gardens Lane. Within one block, views of the pazk and wetlands area open to the right as motonsts, brcyclists or pedestrians have the option of accessing the pazk and contmuing on to the Day Creek Regional Trail or continuing south along Victoria Gazdens Lane. Other key intersections m the village aze• • major community entry at Day Creek Blvd. and Base Line Road • residential entry at Day Creek Blvd. and Church St. • residential entry at Church Street and Victona Gazdens Lane • residential entries along Victona Gazdens Lane and Day Creek Blvd. at them collectors • commercial entries along Victoria Gazdens Lane and Day Creek Blvd. at the new "downtown" eatnes At these entnes, the pedestrian pazkways wrden to contain village entry signage, resting azeas and enhanced landscaping. Insert Graphic -Trails and Entry Plan (amended and attached) 1._.I Page 10. ~, ~, ~ - ~ y • • J TRAILS & ENTRY PLAN Z oey creek ahrd. saeNcs Receea~Onat Corrklor Regional TMI Snutlcem Paoi(ic R.R.RA.W. ~Raib to Tra11s P-u9tffi-1) VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 VILLAGE EDGES The village edges along Base Line Road, Day Creek Boulevazd, Church Street, Victoria Gazdens Lane and Foothill Boulevazd oute 66 will feature specially- landscaped linear parkways which provide visual continuity, pedestrian amerutres and buffers to adjoining residentral uses. Landscaping along Day Creek Boulevard will be consistent with the Day Creek Boulevard ScenidRecreatronal Corridor Master Plan. The key intersectrons of Base Line Rd. and Day Creek Blvd., will be consistent with Community Entrance B in the Day Creek Boulevard Scentc/Recreahonal Corridor Master Plan. HISTORIC WINERY Fundamental to the identity of Victoria Arbors is the historic winery located in the northern portron of the village on Base Line Road. The tradition of viticulture in Cucamonga Valley dates back to the rind-1800s with the introductron of Spanish grapes first grown at the San Gabriel Mission. By the turn of the century, there were forty-five wineries in the valley, and the Ellena Brothers founded the subject winery (in Victoria Arbors) in 1917. After 1934, production was changed to wine vinegar sold under the brand name Regina, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga declazed the site a historic landmark. Victona Arbors will use the viticulture theme in rts village identity, including street names, signage, streetscape and monument landscaping. The winery is tied to Victoria Arbors by a boulevad with a wide pedestrian island terminating in a formally L_J Page I1. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California . January 18, 2002 landscaped tumazound with water feature. This pedestrian island may contain demonstration vineyazds and viticulture/agnculture displays and landscaping, as well as a trail and rest areas with benches and a gazebo. However, the major entrance to the winery is located on Base Lme Rd., m order to prevent disruption and inconvenience to nearby residents. With a demonstration vineyazd, a store, tasting room, wine production and a strong visual presence, the winery will be the thematic focal point for the village. It is possible in the future that historic homes, machinery and products related to the history of the area and its viticulture may be moved onto the winery site. PUBLIC PARK AND WETLANDS AREA A key amenity in the Village of Victona Arbors is its centrally located neighborhood pazk and wetlands pazk area adjacent to the school site. The seven and a half acre pazk is designed to serve the entire village and, due to its connection to the regional trail system along Arbor Lane, and the inclusion of a wetlands park, will also draw interest from adjoining communities. An added feature will be a restored wetland pazk, situated as a diagonal spine into the pazk, potentially containing trails, walkways and educational exhibits. `fhe wetlands will contain examples of flora and fauna typical to the region and kept secure by an open, wrought-iron fence. Due to its location along the regional trail network, the pazk and wetlands area will serve residents from adjoining azeas as well as from Victoria Arbors. Those traveling north or south along Victoria Gazdens Lane and Arbor Lane or east or west through the village will pass duectly by the pazk, and many will be Page 12 ~/~,T-~7 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 drawn in The recreational amenities of the park include both active and passive uses and therefore appeal to all ages. DOWNTOWN OPEN SPACE The landscaped boulevazd/pedestrian island of the Victoria Linear Trail becomes a Town Green as it leaves the single-family residential azea and enters the mixed use area of attached residential, retail and civic uses. The Town Green is a park containing the Victona Linear Trail, landscaping, and street furniture. This Green is connected in the new downtown to the Town Square and the pattern of streets, landscaped sidewalks and small pazks in the main street shopping azea The Town Square is the most urban of the open spaces in the downtown, and will be used for events within downtown Several pocket pazks will be located in the downtown azea, at intersections and in pedestnan circulation "eddies." These small green spaces will provide rest areas and serve to soften the shopping environment. TRAIL SYSTEM A key element to the Village of Victoria Arbors is its extensive trail system, onented both to the region and to the village itself. The entire trail system, described eazlier, serves three major purposes: • links Victona Arbors to surrounding communities, regional trails and proposed commercial uses • surrounds and buffers the village with linear pazkways containing walkways, pedestrian amenities and theme landscaping u r~ Page 13 VICTORIA COMMUrTITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 • provides convenient access to the village's pazk, school, wetlands area and winery as well as a direct connection to the new downtown azea Insert Graphic - IDustrative Concept Plan -The Village of Victoria Arbors (amended and attached) The Arbor Lane Community Trail enters the village at Base Line Road and continues south along Arbor Lane until connecting to the pazk/schooUwetlands site. From here rt continues west, meeting the landscaped boulevazdlpedestrian spine of the village, Arbor Lane Users of the tnal can continue west crossing Arbor Lane and through a small residential neighborhood to linkup with the Day Creek Blvd. Scen:c/Recreational Corridor trail system; or travel south along Arbor Lane to the regional downtown, Victoria Gazdens; or travel north a short distance to the historic vnnery. The Day Creek Boulevard ScenidRecreational Corridor with its regional trail system continues north of Base Line Road, past the Foothill Freeway connection to the Ettwanda North Trail System. It continues south past Foothill Boulevard to Jack Benny Dnve to a trail connecting to the Epicenter Stadium and adult sports park. Internally, the trail and walkway system provides convenient and safe access to the school and pazk sites with widened sidewalks provided along feeder streets Internal street patterns with then many cul-de-sacs provide that children can walk to the school and pazk on a trail system with minimal street crossings In addition, at several important intersections, pedestrian walkways are provided through blocks to link to the regional trail system. Page 14. G, ~ ,L - ~9 11~ae8IIse ~'~~ Illustrative Concept ~t The Village of Victoria Arbor. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE IN VICTORIA ARBORS There will be a mix of housmg types provided in Victoria. This single-family housing is oriented azound the school and pazk sites and is consistent with the family nature of the village and adjacent residential areas to the west, north and east. Multi family housing will provide a transitional use between the single family residential and commercial and civic uses. Multi Family residential will be provided west of Day Creek Boulevazd, which will be fronted along the Boulevazd by mixed use. This mix of housing types will provide more choices to future residents and is consistent with planned and adjacent uses. The following residential land use densities are planned: L -low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) • LM -low-medium (4-8 dwelling units per acre) • M -medium (8-10 dwelling units per acre) MH -medium-high (14-24 dwelling units per acre) H -high (24-30 dwelling units per acre) TRANSITION OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY Res~denhal density will transition from the more rural feeling area around the winery and vmeyazds to the north, to smaller and attached homes neaz the new downtown m the south. Due to the more rural character and a family orientation, low-medium density housing will be the most common use in the north half of the village. The extensive use of cul- Page 15. ~, l~ ~ - 9/ VICTORIA COMMiJNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 de-sacs will provide safe public space for children and necessitate some variation m lot sizes and configuration. A row of lazge (approximately 14,000 square foot) lots will front on Ehwanda Avenue to conform to other large lots that exist along this rural street, while being accessed from their backs from within Victoria Arbors. All homes, which back onto major arterial and secondary highways, will be buffered with a landscaped slope easement and wall. Medium-high to h~Qh residential uses will occur m the residential mixed use area adjacent to the downtown, Victoria Gazdens. Tltis azea will include attached residential dwellinQS, retail, office and civic uses It will create an exciting, urban living environment that will form a symbiotic relationship with the downtown, extending activities into the evenings. Additional medmm-high density and possibly high density senior housing will occur west of Day Creek Boulevazd and south of Church Street, • behind a stnp of mixed use azea Tlms stnp of mixed uses may include attached residential and /or retail uses. A Master Plan for the downtown area, Victoria Gazdens, has been prepazed as part of the first development plan submittals for residential uses and mixed retail/office/residential uses. This Master Plan includes a development (land use) concept for location and configuration of residential, civic, commercial, and retail uses. i Page 16. G,~,T-~z VICTORIA COMMi.TNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 REGIONAL CENTER IS URBAN FOCUS FOR VICTORIA The new downtown will be the commercial focus of Victoria and of the region, extending beyond the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga to include western San Bemazdino County. It is important that this center fulfill its role as the active terminus of the community-wide open space system and as an outstanding regional commercial facilrty. To accomplish these goals, the regional center will be designed as a downtown, Main Street concept. An array of department stores and commercial, retail and civic uses will be complemented with attractive public spaces including a Town Green which is connected to an urban squaze -Town Squaze. This combination of gathering/recreating spaces and the trail system which connects the regional center to the community will make this downtown a unique place that will function as the focus of the Village of Vrctoria Arbors and the retail heart of Rancho Cucamonga The regional center will be surrounded by civic, mixed use and multi-family residential uses which will serve to support the retail uses. Furthermore, the open space corridor - in the form of the village's landscaped boulevazd/pedestrianvay -will conveniently draw both village resrdents and visitors from outsrde Victona Arbors -into the heart of the downtown. Once there, vrsrtors will enjoy a great vanety of activities from shopping to eating to strolling to relaxing The reRronal center will provide a lively street scene with both regional and specialty retail and commercial/office uses complemented with restaurants and servrce commercial. Pedestrian-friendly amenities along the downtown streets will include pocket pazks, outdoor restaurants, benches, accented paving and specialized landscaping Page 17. G,~,L - ~3 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND MASS TRANSIT The Village of Victoria Arbors will accommodate several levels of public transportation. A shuttle system could potentially operate within the retail azea, taking visitors from pazlnng facilities located in peripheral areas of the commercial center to the regional center. Local public transit services could serve residents of Victoria Arbors as well as provide a direct physical connection of the winery to the new downtown. in addrhon, this regional downtown could contain a central transportation node for public buses to serve not only the Village but also the region. In order to make the best use of space m the regional center and in order to maintain relattvely short walking distances within downtown, the use of pazking structures ~s permitted and may be necessary. As the regional center develops over time, pazkmg structures probably would be built to accommodate future mrxed-use development Most likely, the pazking structures would comprise a few levels, they would be naturally ventilated wherever possible, and they would need to be light, awry, and secure for the users. COMMUNITY FACILITIES The Victoria Community Plan will provide specific facilities to meet community needs. These facilities will be convenient to village residents and will minimrze dependence on facilities outside the community. These facilities include schools, pazks, trails, and community-serving retail m village commercial centers and the new downtown area. A children's theater, a library, and a town green aze to be provided in the downtown, Victoria Gardens. Page 18. ~, ~,z - 5~ VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 • PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Pazks and open space have been integrated into the community to form the character and identity of each individual village, as well as Victoria as a whole. This will be accomplished by locating park and community facihUes at the center of each village, connectmg the residential azeas to the central facilities via an extensive trail system, and then connecting each village open space through the Victoria Lineaz Pazk. Village pazks m residential azeas will be large enough to accommodate facilities for use by all village residents Placing pazks next to school playgrounds and facilities will also ma~rtmi7P efficient use of community open space. There is a wide variety of open spaces in the Village of Victoria Arbors. In addition to the extensive trails and pazkways described eazher, the village has a 7.5 acre . neighborhood pazk, a 1.5 acre restored wetland pazk, and a prominent, north south open space comdor that extends from the wmery into the heart of the downtown mall. This greenway consists of an extensively landscaped boulevazd (Arbor Lane) with a wide median step with a trail that extends from a formal tumazound at the neighborhood park, near the winery, to the beginning of the mixed use area near the regional downtown. At this pomt and continuing south, the corridor becomes a Town Green - a landscaped spine with internal pathways. With this vanety of open space and pazk amenities, the Village of Victoria Arbors provides many recreaUOnal opportunities for both residents and visitors. The park, adjacent to the landscaped boulevazd, will be easily accessible to neazby residents but is also located along the regional trail system. The adjoining wetlands park is also along the regional trail system from Victoria Gazdens Lane. More urban public space 1~ Page 19. ~,-~z-~s VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 can be found within the regional center with its Town Green, Town Square and pocket pazks located along the main commercial streets. The downtown, main streets area will have generously landscaped sidewalks and planters, which when added to the small pazks, the Green and the Sguaze, will make the regional center the Victoria Gardens. SCHOOLS Schools have been planned for Victoria to complement and reinforce the open space system. They will be located close to the village pazks in residential neighborhoods, and access by foot or bicycle via the trail system is assured. Joint use of school facilities for broad community needs will be encouraged to make the schools a hub of activity for village activities. These goals aze thoroughly unplemented in Victoria Arbors. The ten-acre elementary school is adjacent to the pazk and accessible by car, bus, shuttle, bicycle, or on foot The school is just off the regional trail system that enters the village from the north at Victoria Gazdens Lane and is directly adjoining the trail that runs east from the boulevazd/open space comdor. The school's central location within the village and its inclusion in a central open space with a pazk and restored wetlands site give it a pmmment and efficient location with unique recreational and educational opportunities. LJ ~1 Page 20. V~~ G1-~ Z - ~f ~ VICTORIA COMMiJNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 CHURCHES Churches can be accommodated in the Village of Victoria Arbors in the following ways: a. Shared facilities at local schools. Though this >s not a suitable permanent solution, it can serve temporary needs. b. The regional retail azea and mixed use areas of the plan, are permissible locations for churches. They can shaze use of commercial parking during off-hours. c. Condominium churches permit joint use church complexes and a reduced land cost for church groups Such innovative use and plans aze encouraged within the villages. • CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES Within the Villages of the Victona Community Plan, many elements have bean structured to provide for the conservation of resources. This will be accomplished in the following ways. Use water for plant materials where the community beneftts most Water will be conserved wherever possible by using low maintenance or drought tolerant plant matenal. Conserving water in naturalized areas will allow the use of water where it will be most needed for more intense community use, such as in parks and water features. The ~7 Page 21. ~t7i ~, Z ' ~~ / VICTORIA COMMUHITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California January 18, 2002 parks and schools, therefore, will have some extensive lawn azeas, wlvch require regular watering. 2. Extensive trail system encourages use of bicycles and pedestrians Trail systems work best where they connect the community residents to the places they use most. The tnal system in Victoria is extensive and will provide the connections that provide the best options for residents and visitors. Direct access is provided to local pazks and schools, to village commercial centers, to regional trails and open space and to other villages. On a regional level, connections will be made to the community's major commercial centers, to the developing industrial center and to neighboring Terra Vista. The Village of Victona Arbors provides pedestrians and bicyclists an array of choices that do not necessitate use of a car. In addition to the regional trail system that enters the village from the north at Victoria Gazdens Lane, pedestrians and bicyclists can travel along the landscaped boulevard as they move south towazds the downtown mixed-use area. Once arriving in the downtown, the pedestrian pathways continue through and terminate at the Town Green. The extensive system of inter-village trails and walkways also provide access to the pazk, school and wetlands pazk. A shuttle system is possible for inter-village travel, going from the tumazound near the winery, accessing the school and pazk, and ending within the downtown regional center. The shuttle system should be coordinated with a pazking facility in the new downtown so that people can leave then vehicles and use the village transit. This interconnected trail system combined with a shuttle could reduce automobile traffic and improve au quality. Page 22. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN -AMENDMENT Village of Victoria Arbors, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California • January 18, 2002 STATISTICAL SUMMARY PLAN EVOLVES THROUGH TIME The purpose of this section rs to explain how residential density and the amount of acreage devoted to the land uses proposed can work together to make the Victoria Community Plan a realty. As the plan is presented here, the optimum residential yield is 8,255 dwelling units, or approximately 8.64 residential dwelling units per acre within the residential portion of the planned community. SUMIvIARY OF LAND USE ACREAGE The acreage figures found on the Land Use Acreage Table on the following page, . represent the proportrons devoted to each land use as shown on the Land Use Plan. These calculations are based on current plans and are subject to corrections based on more refined data as rt is available, (Amend) Insert Graphic -Land Use for Victoria Arbors -September 2000 (amended and attached) Insert Graphic -Proposed Land Use for Victoria Arbors (amended and attached) \_J Page 23. ~, ~,s - ~ 5 ., t ~ 9~l 1 ~ ~. 1i `1 ~~~ ~6 ~ PAC7P[C ~RA[L (6PRR) __ _ - i ._:. 4 ~j~-_~u`_ ~.J1 a ~. ~. ~ / t -•g _ .3...- `.~s:en, :g ; ~ 1 ~ )N-Np1 ~ *~ ~ ~ ~~ ) i~~•^~ ~ +~ LlO -- 3~ . _ -' ~ - I~ Iii Z ~ ) • ~•~ `~ •~~ f ~~ 4~ ~~ [[orU[ LEGEPID CF =COMMUNITY FACILITY H =HIGH RESIDENTAL LM = LOV~MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL M =MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MH =MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL MU = MDCED USE OP =OFFICE PARK O5 =OPEN SPACE RC =REGIONAL CENTER RR =REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL VC =VILLAGE COMMERCIAL »«~« VILLAGE BOUNDARY LAND USE FOR VICTORIA ARBORS -SEPTEMBER 2000 -u ~- -~~ H =HIGH RESIDENTIAL LM =LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL M =MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MH=MEDIUM-HfGH RESIDENTUU. MU =MIXED USE OS =OPEN SPACE RC =REGIONAL CENTER RR =REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL VC =VILLAGE COMMERCIAL PROPOSED LAND USE FOR VICTORIA ARBORS DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8'35 p.m. Brent Le Count July 17, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOR I ANU utvtwrmtrv i HUKCCIVICIV 1 u rv i - ~..~~~~ CITY DEVELOPMENT-The detailed review of a master plan fora 2.45 million square foot open air mixed use mall development including retail, office, speaalty commeraal, restaurant, and entertainment uses as well as approximately 600 multi-family dwelling units on 175 acres of land located v~nthin the limits of the Victona Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south -APN: 227-161-33 and 36, 227-201-33, 35, and 36; 227-171-14; 227-211-7, 28, 30, 39, and 40 Related Files: Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01, General Plan Amendment 01-02. This Master Plan establishes development standards, design standards, development/design review process, phasing, and ultimate build out characterforthe mall. This meeting is intended to introduce the project to the Design Review Committee and begin preliminary design discussions. The Victona Gardens Mall is intended to be a mixed-use center (retail, high density residential, avic, culture, open space, and office uses) within the heart of the "Victona Arbors" community. It is designed as an open-air mall Nnth an urban setting (zero front and side setbacks, parking on the street, outdoor dining, streets/comdors defined by building edges as opposed to rolling landscaped berms and large parking lots) The mtemal streets would all be pnvate with reduced width. The developmentwill be phased with Phase I including the majority of surrounding infrastructure sernng the mall and a major portion of the mall gross leasable area. Staff Comments The follovnng comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: Review Process: The development review process for the protect is intended to be as fast as possible. To that end, it has been suggested that the City Planner eventually handle design review A development proposal that does not meet design cntena of the Master Plan would be referred to the Design Review Committee for review and recommendation. The Committee may wish to discuss when, dunng the overall review process, a level of comfort might be reached to allow for an abbreviated process See page 109 Transoortation/Parkino: 1 A matonty of the parking is remotely located along the penphery of the mall similar to Ontario Mills Some form of shuttle system would help to bnng customers into the central areas of the mall. A connection to the public transit system for the surrounding community would also be benefiaal 2 Angled parking spaces along the mtemal streets seem more user fnendly and would not block traffic as much as parallel spaces. 3 A 10-foot wide sidewalk may not be sufficient, given shop doors opernng onto sidewalk and provisions for outdoor dining The Brea downtown mall has similar sidewalk dimensions and site visits indicate this to be relatively tight, especially when signage, street furniture, and vanous outdoor displays are present Outdoor dining areas should not encroach into the ~` mirnmum sidewalk dimension See street sections starting on page 78 - ~ ~~ V ~ N, DRC COMMENTS . DR 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT July 17, 2001 Page 2 Landscaoing The use of Palm trees, Eucalyptus trees, and Pepper trees make sense because they relate to the Rancho Cucamonga hentage and landscape vernacular The Rancho hentage theme should be continued down to the street level, including trees, shrubs, and groundcover Explore the use of shrubs or ground covers, or other plant types that have natural colors similar to the grape/wine types used for the street names that could further enhance streeUcommunity identity See Landscape Plan, page 21. 2 Explore the use of specialized landscaping along the I-15 Freeway to screen large parking areas and act as visual "draw" to protect Landscaping can be designed to frame'~nnndows" into the mall as viewed from the I-15 Freeway accentuating key elements Building Height 1. The maximum budding height is proposed to be as high as 70 feet This would allow a five-story building This height is also proposed to be allowed along Foothill Boulevard. Perhaps higher buildings/features should be located towards the center of the protect to draw the distant view (such as from the I-15 Freeway or Foothill Boulevard) into the development. Otherwise, tall buildings on the penphery (where mators are proposed) will block views into the site. Perhaps building height limitations could be based upon buildingAease type-office, mator, department store, 15,000 square foot lease and smaller, etc Perhaps only towers and other architectural features should be allowed as high as 70 feet. Building height should be considered in relation to the grade difference of the site (approximately 65 feet of fall from north to south) See Development Standards, page 89 2. Project ID signs, communication equipment, and two "signature" buildings are proposed to be as tall as 90 feet Suggest limiting tall pylon type signs to one sign with freeway exposure, requinng all wireless communication facilities to be stealth type located on or vnthin buildings or on pylon sign, and allowing a specific number of "signature" buildings to be 70 feet tall with the remainder much lower. Sions (see Signage starting on sage 45). Roof signs are a concern, they often appear tacked on as opposed to an integral building component as the Master Plan photo examples show How will wind loads be handled Suggest mounting signs to a budge connecting second floors of buildings across the street from one another. This would achieve the grand elevated statement sought through roof- mounted signs. 2. Provide stronger definition of penphery/edge of mall site, including monumentation for comers of site and main entrances off public streets Monumentation related to the mall should be provided at intersections of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street, Day Creek Lane and Foothill Boulevard, and Foothill Boulevard and Shiraz Street . 3. Avoid exposed neon for large signs The Sign Ordinance prohibits exposed neon, signs must have covenng, such as clear Plexiglas Visually exposed neon has traditionally been discouraged in the community The Committee may wish to discuss use of neon in limited areas for accent and when the sign can be well incorporated with the building design. DRC COMMENTS DR 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT • July 17, 2001 Page 3 4 Do not rely on "Sponsored Murals" to decorate large blank budding walls. How will large blank walls be treated m the intenm~ Consider a graffiti wall or similar area for non- professional large-scale art. Anti-graffiti coatings may be necessary throughout the project to aid graffiti removal 5 Suggest computenzed information kiosks throughout the protect to help patrons navigate the large area. The kiosks could also prowde advertising and notification for upcoming special events. General Desian• 1. The term "development grain" refers to the appearance of organic small lot development that occurred over Ume Clanfy how the small parcel "gram" appearance will be accomplished (per page 32-33), given that the protect will be built atone Ume. 2 Increase emphases on site-specifiGCucemonga-specific hentage and history, especially wme making. A good example is the Masi protect histonc wme walk The development scheme should answer the question, '1~vhy is the project named Victona Gardens?" Prowde water features, public art' statues, agncultural hentage features such as windmills, smudge pots, wagon wheels, etc, and cornerstones. Waterfalls could be designed follovnng • grade changes m the paseos. 4. Page 100 indicates that no two adjacent buildings shall have the same appearance, same color or matenal, but there is no discussion about how to blend one building with the next or develop overall protect cohesiveness. NOT SURE THEY WANT TO "BLEND" Considerthe use of common architectural features (awnings, wall-mounted lights, metal work, tde work, cornices, colors, shapes) to tie the buildings together Consistent use of street furniture - tables, chairs, benches, trash receptacles, streetlights, bollards, low-level lighting, etc., can also foster casual continwty. 5 Roof equipment screernng should include discussion of speciallydesigned architectural roof equpment, if possible. 6 Residential buildings in the northern area could have steps down along the south side to accommodate grade and to have row house appearance 7. Climate Control should include ways to control wind (such as budding onentation, screens, double door foyers, avoidance of Ventun effect, etc), heat (water misters and shade at key locations for rest and recuperation), cold (gas heaters), and rain 8. Suggest use of traditional budding matenals such as wood, Spanish Ule, fieldstone, and bnck (maybe used bnck) Use pedestnan fnendly colors, matenals, textures, shapes at street level/wainscoting (such as bnck instead of split faced block, use of earth tone colors) Provide sensitive transition from parking lots/structures to pedestnan aspects of mall and avoid conflicts with auto arculation. Provide enhanced entry "portals" linking tucked behind parking to Mam Street Avoid alley like appearance 10. Treatment of alleys and loading areas should acknowledge 360-degree architecture. Avoid hawng loading and trash areas conflict with pedestnan/customer traffic. DRC COMMENTS • DR 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT July 17, 2001 Page 4 11 Provide for interim construction fencing For instance, Fashion Island mall in Newport Beach has genenc storefront looking construction fenang as opposed to plain chain link or plywood fenang Similarly, suggest specialized treatment for vacant storefronts to block views into unfinished shops from the street 12 Light fixtures shall integral with the architectural design as opposed to ordinary tacked on shoebox type. 13 Window size and location should be responsive to mountain views, espeaally second-story or higher ~nnndows 14. Screen ground-mounted equipment with low walls Best to congregate egwpment, trash, etc., into service areas surrounded by decorative walls 15. Suggest designating speafic areas within the protect for street kiosk type businesses to avoid the potential of having these businesses block main pedesthan walkways. 16. Include provisions for handling speaal events that n:quire street closure 17. Use stung lights to emphasize unique building, structure, and landscape shapes. 18. Use decorative paving to define pedestnan arculation and parking spaces (textured/colored paving for cross walks, parking spaces) 19. Provide a buffer (noise, light, night time activity) between retail, awc, parking and residential uses Page 24 indicetes, "Many living areas are within 100 feet of retail shops " Staff Recommendation The Design Review Committee may wish to direct the applicant to incorporate the above comments into a revised Master Plan document for further, more detailed Design Review in mid-August. Design Review Committee Action Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Larry Henderson Staff Planner Brent Le Count Staff introduced the protect to the Committee and reviewed recommended items of discussion. The Committee had the following comments Compact Parkins The Committee is opposed to the inclusion of compact parking spaces It is felt that reduced parkng space size will lead to difficulties for patrons of the mall including limited car door swing open area, overhang of vehicles into travel/fire lanes, and difficult pull-in/pull-out movements. Forest City agreed to provide sparking/traffic arculation analysis to demonstrate whether reduced parking numbers and space dimensions function in large, urban themed malls such as Victona Gardens. Intemal pedestnan and vehicle arculation will also be addressed in response to Committee concerns that an overwhelming number of patrons will be drawn to Intemal streets for parking DRC COMMENTS DR 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT July 17, 2001 Page 5 Parking The Committee wishes to see as much angled parking along internal mall streets as possible as opposed to parallel parking spaces While parallel spaces allow for reduced pavement widths and therefore more room for leasable building area, angled spaces are far easier to use and would cause fewer Vaffic blockages The Committee asked why so much of the parking is located around the penphery of the mall Forest City indicated that the intent is to foster a dense downtown feel so parking is pulled out of the core area as much as possible Also, the large penphery parking fields serve the large anchor tenants The protect is designed so that there is parking within 400 feet of any given shop. Pedestnan Connections: The Committee wishes to see a strong pedestnan connection to the rest of the Victona Arbors community, especially the Fdlipi Winery to the north. Design Review Process• The Committee recognizes the need for accelerated design review processing of buildings within the mall It is difficult at this Ume to ascertain exactly when in the process the Committee will acquire enough comfort level to allow City Planner-0nly review of protects. Certainly Phase I of the mall should be reviewed by the Committee, further reviews beyond Phase I may be acceptable for City Planner-only review depending upon the track record established by Phase I Landscaping. Explore the potential for involvement and cooperation with the Filipi Winery to establish a strong sense of wine/grape growing hentage in the landscape. Consider including a demonstration garden where vanous plants and trees, etc., are labeled and their significance to the area outlined Drive-thru Activities• The Committee is opposed to allowing dnve-thru uses along Day Creek Boulevard. Day Creek Boulevard, functions as a gateway to the residential areas to the north Dnve-thrus would be inappropnate for the public view "window" into the rest of the mall from Day Creek Boulevard Including dnve-thrus along this stretch of Day Creek Boulevard could result in a "restaurant row" phenomenon thereby setting a precedent for development of dnve-thrus on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard The Foothill Boulevard frontage of the mall site is more appropnate for dnve-thru uses given the existing dnve-thrus on Foothill Boulevard, the "Route 66" dnve-thru hentage theme, and proximity to the I-15 Freeway. Special cntena will be necessary for dnve-thru uses to guarantee high quality development wnsistent with the new downtown theme of the mall Roof Signs/Icons The Committee is in favor of tall, well~esigned icons that can be seen from the I-15 Freeway and surrounding streets. This includes tastefully designed roof-mounted signs such as the photograph of the "Ghirardelli" sign in the draft Master Plan document The Committee is open to a vanety of different types of signs so long as a festive environment is fostered and clutter minimized. The Committee encourages the developer and staffto "think outside the box" relative to sign design so long as dangerous precedents aren't set for the rest of the City. Architecture/Extenor Building Matenals There should be a significant vanety of different building matenals utilized in the protect. The design of Ontano Mdls mall is not what is hoped for with the Victona Gardens Mall ~ ~~ ~ -~a~ DRC COMMENTS DR 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT . July 17, 2001 Page 6 It is recognized that certain mator tenants will seek "signature" architecture so it is cntical that the Master Plan establish enforceable design guidelines to ensure high quality development consistent with the rest of the mall Forest City indicated that they intend to select at least four architects in addition to Field Paoli to design the vanous buildings within the project to ensure the appearance of organic growth over time Furthermore, Forest City will have it's own internal architectural review/screening process that protects will be subtect to before being brought to the City for review. Plans may even have a stamp of approval from Forest City before submitted to the City Residential/Commercial Interface• It is cntical that the higher intensity commeraal development activity be buffered relative to the multi-family development and single-family development to the north The Committee expressed concern about the large major tenant building shown in the northeast comer of the master plan area This building is located very dose to residential to the west and north and seems out of place. Forest Cdy agreed, indicating they have their own reservations about such a large building in this location This will be further studied Heioht Limits• The Committee is concerned that 70-foot to 90-foot high buildings may overvvhelm the pedestnan fnendly atmosphere intended for the mall Such a high overall height limit may negate the affect of higher visual icons that would be wsible from the I-15 Freewayand surrounding streets. The Committee requested that the Master Plan include cntena for sensitive areas where building heights would be limded Further revew of the Master Plan by the Design Review Committee will be undertaken when staff ' deterrrnnes necessity. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to resolve detailed design issues. • ~,yr -/~7 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.30 p m Brent Le Count November 6, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT -The detailed review of a master plan fora 2 45million square foot open air mixed use mall development including retail, office, speaalty commercial, restaurant, and entertainment uses as well as approximately 600 multi-family dwelling urnts on 174 acres of land located within the limits of the Victona Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south - APN 227-161-33 and 36, 227-201-33,35, and 36, 227-211-7, 28, 30, 39, and 40 Related files Victona Commurnty Plan Amendment 01-01, General Plan Amendment 01- 02 PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Desion Review Committee Action: Members Present. Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Brent Le Count The applicant presented the changes that had been made to the protect since the July? 17, 2001 Design Review meeting. The Committee responded positively to many of the changes but expressed some remaining concerns as listed below. It was agreed that the applicant would address the comments with a full set of plans and details to be presented to the Committee at a special meeting on November 27, 2001. Comments: 1 The frontage of the site on to Church Street at the northeast comer area of the site should be designed as sensitively as possible relative to single-family homes planned to the north. The Terra Vista Town Center frontage along Church Street provides an excellent example to this type of sensitive design. 2 The alignment of Shiraz SUeet through the Foothill Boulevard "out parcels" is acceptable but the Committee is concerned that two northbound lanes and only one southbound lane may not be suffiaent. The traffic engineer for the protect (Mobility Group) was asked to explore the option of having two southbound lanes. 3. The Foothill Boulevard and Leggio "out parcels" shall be parked according to the standards contained in the Development Code The parking ratios established for the Mall proper will not apply to the out parcels 4 The Committee is reluctant to accept less than 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area without more proof that this is wable The applicant agreed to provide more documentation to justify the parking ratios requested (4 5 per 1,000 square feet for first 1,250,000 square feet and 4.25 per 1,000 square feet for floor area in excess of 1,250,000 square feet) The applicant will explore parking efficienaes such as valet parking and shuttling to further justify the suggested parking ratios. 5 Parallel parking spaces are acceptable in limited areas to create asmall-scale downtown atmosphere However, the Committee would like to see as much angles on street (pnvate street) parking as possible • C ~ L -/°~ DRC COMMENTS DR 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT • November 6, 2001 Page 2 6 The concept presented for Arbor Lane with removed median and pedestrian pathways down either side with town homes fronting the street is acceptable The Master Plan document should include as much detail as possible to convey this concept 7 The requested reduction in setbacks along Victoria Gardens Lane from 35 feet average, 25-foot minimum down to 22 feet will regwre very speaalized landsppe design treatment to justify The Committee wishes to see a thoroughly developed concept for this prior to making a final deasion 8 The Committee would prefer to see drive-thru businesses located only along the Foothill Boulevard frontage and not along Day Creek Boulevard as it functions as a gateway to the urban themed mall. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.00 p m. Brent Le Count November 27, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT-The detailed review of a master plan fora 2 45million square foot open air mixed use mall development including retail, office, specialty commercial, restaurant, and entertainment uses as well as approximately 600 multi-family dwelling units on 174 acres of land located within the limits of the Victona Community Plan generally bounded by the future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Foothill Boulevard to the south -APN 227-161-33 and 36, 227-201-33,35, and 36, 227-211-7, 28, 30, 39, and 40. Related files: Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01, General Plan Amendment 01- 02. PLANS AND STAFF COMMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE MEETING. Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Brad Buller, Brent Le Count Forest City Development presented their landscape design concepts for Arbor Way, reduced landscape setbacks along Day Creek Boulevard and Victona Gardens Lane, and for Foothill Boulevard frontage There was also a presentation by Forest City's traffic and parking consultant, The Mobility Group, regarding the parking analysis that had been prepared which provide tustificetion for the recommended parking ratios for the protect. Forest City made it clear that no compact parking is proposed The Committee recommends approval of the project subject to the follovnng comments: 1. The reduced landscape setbacks along Day Creek Boulevard from 45 feet to 43 feet and Victona Gardens Lane from 35 feet to 33 feet are acceptable because the reduction is minimal and the dense Vee and shrub planting combined with high meandering berms well adequately screen parking Furthermore, the parking fields themselves are designed Nnth lushly landscaped planters throughout 2 The revised design for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard is unimpressive especially relative to the current design provided by the Day Creek Master Plan If Forest City is to modify the curent conceptual plan for the intersection, the overall quality will need to be upgraded substantially in order to be comparable to the Day Creek Master Plan design The Committee used words such as "stunning" and "breathtaking" to descnbe the level of quality of design treatment this intersection deserves If there were insuffiaent time to actually come up with a revised schematic design for the intersection, a statement in the Master Plan stating the design intent, including a commitment to matching the quality of the curent Day Creek Master Plan design would suffice, and be subject to Design Review Committee review 3 The Committee agrees with the applicant that treatment of the frontage of Foothill Boulevard from the I-15 Freeway southbound off-ramp to Day Creek Boulevard is cntical relative to the entry statement for the project as well as the City as a whole However, similar to the Day Creek/Foothill Boulevards intersection design, the Committee wishes to see substantial upgrade of the landscape/hardscape design treatment for this section of Foothill Boulevard This may be handled by a statement in the Master Plan describing the special nature and function of this section of Foothill Boulevard and how Forest City intends to treat it DRC COMMENTS • DA 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT November 27, 2001 Page 2 4. The Committee is willing to recommend approval of the project with the parking ratios provided by the applicant so long as the Master Plan includes provisions for parking effiaency measures such as valet parking (tandem parking), off-site employee parking, and perhaps shuttling/trolley system should the need arise The Committee prefers not so see dnve-thru fast food restaurants located along the Day Creek Boulevard frontage from Foothill Boulevard north to Church Street. Day Creek Boulevard functions as a gateway into the more urban mall atmosphere and it is felt that dnve-thru type uses, no matter how well screened, undermine the urban theme. It would be acceptable however, to locate dnve-thru uses along the Foothill Boulevard frontage of the site The Master Plan should include a provision that there are no vehicle entry points to the residential parcels along Arbor Way other than the main east-west spine street shown on the Site Plan 7. The Master Plan should include a statement that dimensions shown are conceptual onlyand subject to change with Phase One Design Review Speafically agreed upon dimensions such as the average and minimum setbacks along Day Creek Boulevard, etc ,maybe stated as such for clanfication. The applicant agreed to the requested change and comments If possible the applicant may present the Committee with rewsed landscape designs for Foothill Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard/Day Creek Boulevard intersection, pnor to rewew by the Planning Commission r1 L_J RESOLUTION NO 02-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ENTER INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, INCLUDING A MASTER PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PROJECT KNOWN AS VICTORIA GARDENS, AMIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 2 45 MILLION SQUARE FOOT RETAIL, OF, AND CIVIC USES AS WELL AS 600 MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ON APPROXIMATELY 175 ACRES OF LAND THE PROJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE CITY BOUNDARY AND THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AND IS GENERALLY BOUNDED BY FUTURE CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, I-15 TO THE EAST, AND THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 Forest City Development California, Inc , filed an application for Development Agreement No 01-02, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Agreement is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 The subtect property of the Development Agreement is legally descnbed herein 4 A true and correct copy of the proposed Development Agreement is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the associated Environmental Impact Report prepared for said protect 5 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 This Commission hereby specifically finds that the Development Agreement and each and every term and provision contained therein, including the associated Master Plan, conform to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Based upon the facts and information contained in the "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028," together with all written and oral reports, the ~~Z - //Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 2 Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment beyond those impacts related to air quality and trafficthat are significant and unavoidable and will, therefore, necessitate a Statement of Ovemding Considerations by the City Council a That the "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028," has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental QualityAd of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Environmental Impact Report prepared therefore reflects the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Environmental Impact Report with regard to the application b The "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028," identifies that all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect with the exception of those impacts related to air quality and traffic that are significant and unavoidable and will, therefore, necessitate a Statement of Ovemdmg Considerations by the City Counal c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028" forthe project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victoria Gardens SCH No 2001031028," the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effects as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations and recommends that the City Counal adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations relative to significant unavoidable impacts related to air quality and traffic 4 This Commission hereby recommends approval of the Development Agreement listed as „ Exhibit A" of the staff report including the referenced Master Plan listed as Exhibit "B" of the staff report subtect to each and every condition set forth below and the attached standard conditions incorporated hereto by this reference Planning Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) The development of the tnangular "Leggin" out parcel at the northeast comer of the protect bound by future Church Street to the north, future Victona Gardens Lane to the west, and the I-15 Freeway to the east, ~i, ~l, T - //.~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 3 the Foothill Boulevard out parcels bound by future Victoria Gardens Lane to the north, future Day Creek Boulevard to the west, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and Foothill Boulevard to the south, and the roughly 18 acres of future residential development along the north edge of the protect between future Church Street and "D"Street shall comply with applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan 3) The allowed list of land uses for Day Creek Boulevard shall not include fast food drive-thru restaurants north of Victoria Gardens Lane Other forms of drive-thru uses may be permitted subtect to Development Review/Conditional Use Permit Drive-thru uses that include fast food restaurants, as defined by Development Code Section 17 30 030 (w), maybe permitted on Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Victoria Gardens Lane with the exception of the corner parcel (Parcel 53 on Tentative Parcel Map) on which no drive-thru uses may be permitted All drive-thru development on Day Creek Boulevard shall be very well screened and designed to be consistent with the urban atmosphere of the Regional Center 4) Unless otherwise specified in the Master Plan text, all dimensions shown on conceptual plans and schematics within the Master Plan are . shown to convey design concepts only and are subject to change with Phase 1 Design Review 5) The revised design for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard shall be per the Day Creek Master Plan Any revised design shall be subfect to Design Review Committee review The revised design may have reduced land area devoted to intersection enhancement, but the overall level of quality must be on par with the current design per the Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Arbors Master Plans Whatever design is established for the northeast corner shall apply to the other three corners as welt 6) Parallel parking spaces are acceptable m limited areas to create a small-scale downtown atmosphere, however, provide as much angled on street (private street) parking as possible No compact parking spaces shall be allowed 7) The frontage of the site on Church Street at the northeast comer area of the site shall be designed as sensitively as possible relative to single-family homes planned to the north The Terra Vista Town Center frontage along Church Street provides an excellent example to this type of sensitive buffer design 8) The building on Parcel 68 shall comply with the building, parking and average landscape setbacks relative to Church Street per the Development Code PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC • January 23, 2002 Page 4 9) All environmental mitigation measures per the approved Mitigation Momtonng Program, shall apply 10) Within 45 days of City Counal approval, a revised Master Plan text mcorporatmg the changes required shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval Upon acceptance by the City Planner, a total of 50 unbound, 3-hole punch copies of the Master Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division In addition, one camera-ready original (unbound) and one executable copy on a CDROM m Microsoft Word or Microsoft 11 shall be submitted 11) All interior streets, drive aisles, and pedestrian pathways shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act to the satisfaction of the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Offiual Enpineenna Division 1) Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway on/off ramps a) Provide a southbound off-ramp free right-tum only lane with a • "pork-chop" channelization island b) Construct a free right-tum lane for eastbound Foothill Boulevard to southbound I-15 Freeway c) Modify traffic signal as requred 2) Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard a) Provide a westbound free right-tum lane b) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet m length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide two eastbound left-tum lanes 420 feet in length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide a southbound free right-tum lane 200 feet in length wrath a 120-foot taper e) Provide northbound and southbound bus bays on Day Creek Boulevard f) Provide eastbound and westbound bus bays on Foothill Boulevard • g) Provide three southbound left-tum lanes, one southbound through, and one southbound free right-tum lane Cry/ Z "~~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 5 h) Provide an 8-foot wide median to serve as a pedestrian refuge on the north leg of this intersection or provide an overhead pedestnan budge across the east leg of this intersection, or other appropnate pedestrian crossing subiect to City Engineer approval 3) Foothill Boulevard between I-15 Freeway and Day Creek Boulevard ~~ a) To be improved to the City's and Caltrans Ma1or Divided Highway" standards (Typical mid-block section curb-to-curb = 20 x12x12x14x 14x14x12x12x20feet, except at intersections) b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as requred c) Provided raised landscaped medians d) Median openings will not be allowed between Day Creek Boulevard and I-15 Freeway e) Provide 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, as required f) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as required g) Provide signing and stnping, as regwred h) Foothill Boulevard west of Day Creek Boulevard shall be constructed full width and transitioned to loin existing, subieci to City Engineer Approval 4) Day Creek Boulevard at Victona Gardens Lane a) Provide a northbound free right-tum lane b) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 200 feet in length with a 90-foot taper c) Provide a southbound left-turn lane 300 feet in length with a 90-foot taper d) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 350 feet in length with a 120-foot taper, one left and through shared lane, and a separate nght-tum lane The taper for the westbound nght-turn only lane shall begin ai the ECR of Pnvate Dnve "A " e) Provide a traffic signal 5) Day Creek Boulevard at Church Street . a) Provide a northbound left-turn lane, three through lanes, and one separate right-turn lane / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 6 b) Provide a northbound left-turn lane 350 feet in length with a 120.foot taper c) Provide a northbound right-turn lane 200 feet in length with a 60.foot taper d) Coordinate with the Amencan Beauty protect so that stnping wtll line up across this intersection e) Provide a traffic signal 6) Day Creek Boulevard at Pnvate Drrve "L" (North Main) a) Provide two southbound left-turn lanes 375 feet in length with a 120-foot taper b) Provide a northbound left-turn pocket 250 feet in length with a 90-foot taper c) Provide for northbound and southbound bus bays d) Provide a traffic signal 7) Day Creek Boulevard at Pnvate Dnve "V" (South Main) a) Provide a southbound left-turn pocket 350 feet in length with a 120-foot taper b) No northbound left turns or eastbound left turns will be permitted c) No eastbound or westbound through traffic wdl be permitted d) Provide a traffic signal 8) Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street a) To be improved to the City's "Mator Divided Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb =curb 16 x 11 x 13 x 14 x 13 x 11 x 16 feet, except at intersections) b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required c) Provide raised landscaped medians Median openings wdl only be allowed at signalized intersections d) Provide bike lanes on Day Creek Boulevard e) Provide streetlights, as requred (residential, 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) f) Provides R 26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as regwred PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 7 g) Provide signing and striping, as required 9) Church Street at Victoria Gardens Lane a) Provide an eastbound left-tum lane 200 feet m length with a 90-foot taper b) Provde a separate eastbound right-tum only lane 200 feet m length with a 60-foot taper c) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 250 feet in length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide one northbound left-tum lane, one through lane, and separate right-tum lane e) Provide a northbound left-turn lane 350 feet in length with a 120-foot taper f) Provide a traffic signal with northbound right-tum overlap phasing g) Provide a continuous raised median island 4 feet in width on Victoria Gardens Lane from Church Street to Private Drive "L" (North Main) The curb-to-curb width of the street shall be 68 feet 10) Church Street at "unnamed street" east of Victoria Gardens Lane a) Provide a driveway for the future development located on the southeast comer of Church Street and Victoria Gardens Lane This driveway shall align with "unnamed street " b) Provide westbound left-turn lane 200 feet in length with a 90-foot taper 11) Church Street between Victoria Gardens Lane and Etiwanda Avenue a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Mator Arterial" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 20 x 12 x 14 x 12 x 20 feet, except at intersections) Modifications to the existing I-15 Freeway support system may be regwred b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required c) Provide a raised median on Church Street, between Victoria Park Land and Etiwanda Avenue d) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential, 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) e) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as regwred ~ ~ ~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC • January 23, 2002 Page 8 f) Provide signing and striping, as regwred g) Provide bike lanes on Church Street 12) Church Street between Victoria Gardens Lane and Day Creek Channel a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Secondary Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 20 x 12 x 14 x 12 x 20 feet, except at intersections) b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) Provide streetlights, as required (residential, 9500 and commeraal 16,000 lumen HPSV) d) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as required e) Provide signing and stnping, as regwred ~ Provide bike lanes on Church Street g) Reconstruct Church Street from Day Creek Channel west to Rochester Avenue as determined by the City Engineer 13) Victona Garden Lane at Private Drive "L" (North Main) a) Provide a northbound left-turn lane 300 feet in length with a 120-foot taper b) Provde a southbound left-turn lane 200 feet in length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide a continuous raised median island 4 feet in width from Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) to 300 feet south of Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) The curb-to-curb width of the street shall be 68 feet d) Provide a traffic signal 14) Victona Gardens Lane at Pnvate Drive "II" a) Provide an eastbound left-tum lane 300 feet in length with a 120-foot taper b) Prowde a traffic signal . 15) Victona Gardens Lane at Private Drive "JJ" a) Provide an eastbound left-tum lane 260 feet in length with a 90-foot taper ~, N r /~~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 • Page 9 b) Provide a westbound left-tum lane 200 feet m length with a 90-foot taper c) Provide a raised median island 340 feet m length east of Pnvate Dnve "JJ" d) Prowde a traffic signal 16) Victona Gardens Lane between Church Streei and Day Creek Boulevard a) To be improved to the Cdy's "Modified Mator Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 64 feet (16 x 11 x 10 x 11 x 16 feet), or 68 feet where a raised median island is regwred b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required c) Provide a two-way left-tum lane from "C" Street to North Main d) Provide streetlights, as required (residential, 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) e) Provides R 26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as regwred f) Prowde signing and stnpmg, as required g) Prowde for bike lanes 17) Pnvate Dnve "B" (Arbor Lane) at Church Street a) Prowde eastbound and westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet m length with a 90-foot taper b) The north/south through lanes must align and coordinate with the Amencan Beauty Protect c) Prowde two northbound left-tum lanes 200 feet m length with a 120-foot taper d) Prowde for bike lanes 18) Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Lot MM, Lot KK, and Victona Gardens Lane shall be public streets All other internal lettered lots shall be considered to be Pnvate drive aisles 19) Developer shall make a fair share contnbution for mitigation of Traffic impacts outside the /urisdiction of the City m the following amounts pnor to recordation of map a) Etiwanda Avenue at Stover Avenue - $10,700 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC • January 23, 2002 Page 10 b) Cherry Avenue at Base Line Road - $29,400 c) Cherry Avenue at Foothill Boulevard - $52,500 d) Milliken Avenue at SR-210 Freeway Eastbound Ramps - $2,568 e) Fourth Street at I-15 Freeway Southbound Ramps - $7,061 f) Day Creek Boulevard at SR-210 Freeway Westbound Ramps - $149,631 g) Day Creek Boulevard at SR-210 Freeway Eastbound Ramps - $11,415 h) Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway Southbound Ramps- $86,807 i) Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue - $67,720 ~) Etiwanda Avenue at San Bernardino Avenue - $10,344 k) Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange - $4,543,974 20) Traffic signals within the vicinity of this protect shall be interconnected Interconnect shall be provided to future signals 21) Provide an on-street master controller and telephone drop 22) Provide traffic signal coordination timing for the morning, noon, and night peak penods using the Synchro and Sim traffic software program Traffic model data shall be provided to the City on 3 5 diskettes 23) The City "Driveway Policy" shall apply for all proposed dnveways on Victona Gardens Lane 24) Bus bays shall be provided at the following locations northbound and southbound on Day Creek Boulevard at Foothill Boulevard, Church Street, Pnvate Dnve Aisle Letter Lot "L", and Pnvate Drrve Aisle Letter Lot"V" 25) Bus bays shall be provided eastbound and westbound on Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard 26) All internal Pnvate intersections shall allow for left and nght turn of Fire Trucks 27) All crosswalks at intersections need to be setback at least 1-foot from traveled way This is to prevent pedestrians from being hit by parallel through traffic 28) Reaprocal access for ingress and egress across all parcels are required due to the properties not having access to a public street ~~ ~~ /~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 11 29) Internal pnvate dnve aisles a) Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and dnveways, as required b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Provide signing and striping, as required d) Dnveways into parking lots shall be a minimum of 100 feet from intersections e) Only one mid-block pedestrian crossing will be penniried between street intersections f) The minimum curb-to-curb width where angled parking is desired on one side of the street is 44 feet (13 feet, 15 feet, and 16 feet) g) The minimum curb-to-curb width where angle parking is desued on both sides of the street is 62 feet (16 feet, 15 feet, 15 feet, and 16 feet) 30) The street trees and walkway concepts along the public/private streets . shall be approved as determined by the City Engineer 31) The freeway landscaping shall be installed by the developer and provide for maintenance fora 20-year penod as approved by the City Engineer 32) Staff attempted to address all streets and intersections If any were overlooked, then those missed shall be designed with the general intent of the other locations around the mall 33) The CFD is constructing a large portion of the off-site facilities Any off- site regwrement not constructed with the CFD is subject to developer- to-developer reimbursement Submit for reimbursement agreement within six months of acceptance by the City or all nghts to reimbursements are void 34) Speaal medians, such as Foothill Boulevard median orArbor Lane will require electncal power to facilitate community programming slated for the median/street 35) LMD areas shall have a maximum of 31 slopes with maximum retaining wall of 30 inches, except the east side of Day Creek Boulevard shall have maximum slope of 4 1 Top of slope and toe of slope shall have a minimum 1-foot flat area to pedestrian walkways (2- foot flat area at top of slope for larger slopes per city standard 36) Parkways shall be 2 percent from the top of the curb to the back of the walk ~Z /~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC • January 23, 2002 Page 12 37) All utddies off-site and on-site shall be handled according to the underground utility policy Utilities on the opposite sides of the streets fronting the protect shall have fees paid in accordance with the policy Utilities on the protect side of the street fronting the protect shall be undergrounded in accordance with the policy 38) The developer may be required to sign a consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Faalities District as determined by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 39) Complete all street frontage improvements (to center line of the street) and interior street improvements at developer's own cost Developer is eligible for transportation fee credit and/or reimbursement for those facilities that are part of the program Request for reimbursement shall be applied for within six months of completion of the improvements or all rights to reimbursement shall be nullified The developer shall also complete all off-site street improvements as required by the Conditions of Approval Said off-site improvements are eligible for transportation fee credit and reimbursement subtect to the adopted program or eligible . for developer-to-developer reimbursement Both forms of reimbursement shall be applied for within six months of completion of the street improvements or all rights to reimbursement shall be nullified The development is responsible to reimburse other development if they install any frontage improvements Installation of improvements and fair share cost wdl be proportioned by the CFD documents Developer- to-developer reimbursements wdl have to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in comparison with the improvements within the CFD Fue Prevention 1) The protect is located within a "Mello-Roos" Community Faalities District for fire protection services 2) Prior to issuance of any building permit the applicant shall submd a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 3) Prior to the issuance of any budding permits, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data, and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contact the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 4) When any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 • Page 13 The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not Ime-of-sight 5) The required fire flow for this protect shall be 4,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made m accordance with Fve Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes, one fire hydrant is regwred per 1,000 gallons of regwred fire flow 6) The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 7) Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provde the required fire flow subtect to Fire Distnct review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent properly shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 8) If the system is pnvate, the applicant shall do the following pnor to the issuance of the building permit a) Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the Distnct b) For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement that shall be submitted to the Fire Distnct for acceptance 9) Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway m accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engmeenng Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On pnvate property, these markers are to be maintained m good condition by the property owner 10) Pnor to the issuance of a budding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct Water Avadabd~ty for F~2 Protection Fonn shall be completed by the Water Distnct and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct If sufficient water to meet fire flow requvements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required m each structure affected by the insufficient flow 11) All commercial or mdustnal structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupanaes with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, multi-family residential structures, and all structures that do not meet Fire Distnct access requirements (See Fire Access below) shall be protected by an approved automatic fire spnnkler system ~,~;~ /~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 • DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 14 12) Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, multi-family residential structures, and all structures that do not meet Fire Distract access regwrements (See Fire Access below) shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire Distract 13) Fire Distract access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building constructed when any portion of the faality or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the bulding is located mare than 150-feet from an approved fire distract vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bulding 14) Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets, and designated fire lanes 15) Commercial/Industrial and Multi-family Residential Requred Note Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tracUparcel map or the issuance of any . grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans and specifications for the approval of the Fire Distract for all Fire Distract access roadways within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site 16) Roadways and Fire Lanes Required Note Pnorto issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets, courts, and cut-de-sacs from the Fie Distract in consultation vwth the Grading Committee The plans shall includethe plan wew, sectional wew, and indicate the ~ndth of the street or court measured flow Ime to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when othervnse regwred Applicable CCBR's, or other approved documents, shall contarn provisions that prohibit obstructions, such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways v~nthout pnorwrmen approval of the Fire Distnd, Fire Safety Division 17) Private Roadways and Fire Lanes Required Note The inside turn radius shall be 20 feet The outside turn radds shall be not less than 50 feet The minimum radius for cut-de-sacs is 45 feet The minimum unobstructed Hndth for a Fire Distnd access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry, the minimum median vndth of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 18) Dead-end Fire Distract Access Roadways Regwred Note Dead-end Fire District access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided v~nth approved provisions for the fuming around of fire apparatus This may inGude a cut-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire Distract ~ ~ T /~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 15 19) All portions of the fatality or any portion of the extenor wall of the first story shall be located within 150 feet of Fire Distnd vehiGe access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the extenor of the budding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are an obstruction 20) Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fin: apparatus access road to extenor bulding openings 21) All buildings that have three or more stones or are 30 feet in height shall be provided wdh fire apparatus access on at least two sides Access to extenor walls shall extend from 5 to 50 feet honzontally, wrath no vertical obstructions 22) Knox Rapid Entry System A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed pnor to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted pnor to final bwlding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for spetafic details and ordenng information 23) Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 24) A bwlding or site directory shall be requred, as noted below a) Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site b) Standard directory in budding lobby 25) Emergency access, a minmum 26 feet in vwdth and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and Gear of any obstructions at all times dunng construction, in accordance vnth Fire Distract Standards 26) Pnor to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire Distract for fire lanes on required Fire Distract access roadway less than 40 feet in vndth The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A draHnng of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be submitted and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "Fire Distnd Access -Fire Lanes" standard 27) New buldings otherthansingle-family dwellings shall post the addresswdh minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electntaally illuminated dunng penods of darkness When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- dluminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 28) In multi-umt complexes, approved address numbers and/or bwiding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all unds, ~ y, z - ~a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 . DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 16 suites, or buildings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbenng plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga 29) Pnor to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire Disinct Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times 30) Pnor to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for any required notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal 31) The follovrnng fees may be applicable to this protect and are being ident~ed at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subtect to approval by the Fire Distnct The fees for these . additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division a) $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial, or multi-family dwelling units (paid prior to TRC), plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fue Safety Division b) Fire District Access Review (Includes Fire Lane Plans) c) $132 Minor Development Review Fee (MDR) (Remodel/Tenant Improvement) d) $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) e) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection f) $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply g) $677 (per new building) for New Commercial and Industrial Development Note Separate plan check fees v~nll be assessed by the Fire Construction • Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 . Page 17 32) The following service fees are due to the Fire District and payable at this time, plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division a) $82 Start-up fee for commerGal, industrial or multi-famiy dwelling units (Paid pnor to TRC) b) $132 Fire District Review of Tracl or Parcel Maps other than Single- famdy Residential Tract c) $214 -Total due at this time Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District " Note Separate plan check fees wdl be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extmgwshmg systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 33) As noted below Speaal Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) a) General Use Permit shall be requred for any activity or operation . not speafically described below, which mthe /udgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that maybe hazardous to life or property b) Operate a place of public assembly c) To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the required fire district access roadway This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump, or any device that delays or slows Fire District response d) High pled combustible storage e) Candles and open flame m public assembly 34) Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction m accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards Note In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews well be assessed at time of submittal of plans 35) Compliance wdh Fire District mitigation measures identified in , Environmental Impact Report ~~/-T /a~ ~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 18 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planrnng Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS Nd~S COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DA01-02 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT/MASTER PLAN FOR VICTORIA GARDENS APPLICANT: FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC LOCATION: NWC OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/I-15 FREEWAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Comolehon Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved Master Plan, the _/_/_ conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan 2 Pnor to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions /_/ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as ail Uniform Building Code and _/_/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits SC-11-01 1 I. ~ 7 ~~® Protect No DA01-02 Completion Date 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance beyond the associated Victoria Community Plan amendments and the Development AgreemenUMaster Plan 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect ad/scent properties 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public wew 9 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 10 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cily Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 11 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 13 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in confunction with street improvements 14 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 15 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencng 16 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products C. Shopping Centers • 1 The Master Plan is approved Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subtect to separate DevelopmenUDesign Review process for Planning Commission approval Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subtect to Planning Commission approval -/-/- -/-/. -/-/. -/_/ -/-/ -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- _/_/. -/- - -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-11-01 2 Cyr {fiL l~ / Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City -/-/- Planner . a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the protect) -/-/- b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to -/-/- include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins -/-/- d Roll-up doors -/-/- e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids -/-/- f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis -/-/- g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to -/-/- be hidden from view 3 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours -/-/- 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and -/-/- debris remain for more than 24 hours 5 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " -/-/- 6 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an -/-/- exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 d6 during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or -/-/ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar obtects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise speafied herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 7 Textured pavement shall be provided across arculation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza -/-/- They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submiried for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 8 All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control Detailed plans shall be -/-/- included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza -/-/- area hghtmg fixtures, budding hghhng fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures 10 All future protects within the shopping center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent -/-/- with the architectural program established by the Master Plan 11 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into -/-/- the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or -/-/~ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bulding plans s~.,,-0, 3 ~ N, l l~2 Project No DA01-o2 Completion Date . 2 For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main budding colors E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across arculation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 Ail parking spaces shall be double striped per Ctty standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of budding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 6 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 7 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office faalities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet 8 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects or more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the requred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever js greater After the fast 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 9 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercal, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet F. Trip Reduction 1 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and single- family developments of 500 or more units 2 Shower facility accessible to both men and women shall be provided for persons walking or bicycling to work for each protect which meets the following thresholds Commercial Industrial Office Hotels and Motels SC-11-01 / / / / / I / / I / / I I / -/-/- I / / / / / -/-/- 250,000 square feet 325,000 square feet 125,000 square feet 250 rooms ~, ~l, ~ -3 Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner revew and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch _/_/_ box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_I_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _I_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in verttcal height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_I_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included _/_/_ in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Ctty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, spectmen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along public street frontage 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 12 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval _/_/_ prior to issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree speaes 13 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code _ sc.,,-o, Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date 14 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the • freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shalt be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way H. Signs Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominwm, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 2 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 1.000 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory • performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit 3 In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i e) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a wntten mondonng and reporting program to the City Planner pnor to issuance of building permits Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented J. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, • b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, -/-/- -/-/- -/- - -/- -/-/- -/-/- / / SC-11-01 8 ~ ~'7 L /~~ Protect No DA01-02 Completion Date d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of • service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Pro/ect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required pnor to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are requred for fencing and/or walls _I_I_ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage tc _/_I_ the City prior to permit issuance 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Bwldmg and Safety Division L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_I_ marked with the pro/ect file number (i e , DA01-02) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Bwldmg and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mator addition to _!_/_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Dtviston pnor to permit issuance 3 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commeraal or industrial development or addition _/_I_ to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to permd issuance 4 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and _I_/_ prior to issuance of budding permits 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 6 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/_ counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering _/_/_• use, area, and fire-resistiveness Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Bulding Code for required occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _I_/_ 4 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental _/_/_ Health Services prior to issuance of budding permits 5 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table _I_/_ 5-A 6 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls _I_I_ 7 Roofing materials shall be Class "A " _I_I_ 8 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 9 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 10 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/_I_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour 11 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _I_/_ fire-resistive construction 12 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906 _/_/_ 13 Provide method of airborne and impact sound transmission control between dwelling units _/_/_ 14 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements maybe needed _/_/_ ~ G i . r ad ng 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City _/_/_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ pertorm such work 3 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits _/_/_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMP LIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. De dication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) Varies total feet on Foothill Boulevard _I_/_ Varies total feet on Church Street _/_/_ Varies total feet on Day Creek Boulevard _/_/_ Varies total feet on Victoria Gardens Lane / / /^~ (~/ vj 1 / ~ ~ ~ ~ -_- SC-11-01 8 Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date 3 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per Clty Standards 4 Reaprocai access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the Issuance of bwlding penults, where no map Is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 7 All existing easements Iying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map 8 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 9 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right tum lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right tum lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided 10 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property Interests necessary to construct the required public Improvements, and if heJshe should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquves the property interests required for the Improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs Incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required In connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Clty, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the Clty prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies In particular, but not limited to Master Plan storm drain and off-site right-of-way P. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (Interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, dove approaches, sidewalks, streetlights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side• walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail ether Foothill Boulevard X X C X X X Church Street X X X X X X X Da Creek Boulevard X X X X X X X X Victoria Gardens Lane X X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 _/_/_ -/-/~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- I / r1 I~ SC-11-01 9 i ~i t Prged No DA01-02 Comolehon Date 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights _/_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _/_/_ permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal condut with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City - _/_/ Standards or as duetted by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwnng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _I_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for fast plan check _/_/_ 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required 6 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way _I_I_ Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway 5~.,,-0, Project No DA01-02 Completion Date Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall _/_/_ be submitted to the Crty Engineer for rewew and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District The medians within the perimeter public streets not constructed with the CFD 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or _I_/_ other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 3 A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_/_ developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards R. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facildies shall be installed as required by the City Engineer th / / + e 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering _ _ _ property from adtacent areas 3 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is requved for work within its _/_/_ right-of-way 4 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm dram pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 5 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a _/_/_ sump catch basin on the public street S. Improvement Completion 1 If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _/_/_ an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for Parcel Map 15716 T. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _I_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _I_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_* Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first SC-11-01 11 ~7~ ~~ -L ~ / Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval • In the case of subdivision or pnor to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them U. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the Clty covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District TBA among the newly created parcels 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way SBCFCD and Caltrans 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covenng the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to bulding permit issuance rf no map is involved 4 Pnor to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Community Facilities Districts 1 Thls protect Is subject to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District W. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fve Dlstnct and the Water Dlstnct 2 Prior to the Issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Flre District Plans and installation shall comply with Flre Dlstnct standards 3 Fire flow regwrements for this protect shall be 4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendlx III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendlx III-B, as amended 4 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 5 Reqwred Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the Issuance of the building permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the Dlstnct • b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reaprocai maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Flre Dlstnct for acceptance -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / / / / / / / / I SC-11-01 12 ~/ ~ f /~ Protect NO DA01-02 Comole6on Date 6 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective -I -l pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Retiect~ve Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner X. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire _I_I_ flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DisVict If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow Y. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupances with an _I_I_ occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fve District access requirements (FP5), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 2 Reqwred Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating ~_/_ that all commercial structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section "E" -Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire District Z. Fire Access 1 Commercial Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tracUparcel map or the issuance of any grading ~_/_ permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire Distract emergency access roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site 2 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and _/_~_ obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation Nnth the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise regwred Applicable CC&Rs, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other mod cations in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 3 The minimum width for a Fire District access road or fire lane is 26 feet The mirnmum inside turn -I-I_ radius is 20 feet The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet The minimum radius for cut-de-sacs is 50 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 4 All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within _1-/- 150 feet of Fire Disfrict vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior building openings sc-»-o, Pro~ecl No DA01-02 ComoleGOn Date 5 All bwldings that have three or more stones, or are 30 feet in height shall be provided with fire _I_/_ apparatus access on at least two sides Access to exterior walls shall extend from 5 to 50 feet horizontally, with no vertical obstructions 6 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be rnstailed submitted prior to final bwldmg plan approval and ordering rnfornation prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be Contact the Fire Safety Division for specfic details 7 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submrt and obtain the Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fire District access roadways/driveways 8 Gated or restricted access regwres the installation of a Knox rapid entry system Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch Additionally for vehicle access gates, an approved, compatible traffic signal preemption device vvill be required to open the gate The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch Contact the Fire Safety Division for speck details and ordering information 9 The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems This condition applies when the Fire District determines that such gates or other means of restricting access or delaying response exists 10 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 11 A bwldmg directory shall be required, as noted below • X Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site X Standard directory in building lobby 12 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and Gear of any obsWctions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards AA. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Reqwred Note Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg permit for combustible consWction, the budder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site BB. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Cali the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety SitelArchitectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal CC. Fees 1 Fire Distract fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows " X $132 Minor Development Review Fee (MDR) (Remodel/Tenant Improvement) X $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) X $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection SC-11-01 ,4 ~, ~r,.z /~3 / / / / I / / / / / / / I / I Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date X $132 for Prnate Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply X $677 (per new bwlding) for Multi-family Residential Development X $677 (per new bwlding) for New Commercial and Industrial Development "Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant rewews v~nll be assessed upon separate submittals of plans DD. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Speaal Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life or property b Operate a place of public assembly c High pled combustible storage d Candles and open flame in public assembly e Other Installation of any access control systems/devices upon or within the required Fire Distract access roadway EE. Plan Submittal Required Notice Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance v~nth 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a Calrfomia Registered Professional Cml Engineer. FF. Other Requirements/Comments 1 NOTE Prior to Planning Division approval the applicant must address all, and resolve all Fire District comments and/or conditions / / / / I / / / / / • -/-/- • / / / / / / SC-11-01 15 ~~' "~ /~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 3 Victoria Gardens Lane to the west, and the I-15 Freeway to the east, the Foothill Boulevard out parcels bound by future Victona Gardens Lane to the north, future Day Creek Boulevard to the west, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and Foothill Boulevard to the south, and the roughly 18 acres of future residential development along the north edge of the protect between future Church Street and "D" Street shall comply with applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Victora Community Plan, except where speafically detailed in the Master Plan 3) The allowed list of land uses for Day Creek Boulevard shall not include fast food dnve-thru restaurants north of Victona Gardens Lane Other forms of dnve-thru uses may be permitted subtect to Development Rewew/Conditional Use Permit Dnve-thru uses that include fast food restaurants, as defined by Development Code Section 17 30 030 (w), maybe permitted on Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Victona Gardens Lane Huth the exception of the comer parcel at Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard (Parcel 53 on Tentative Parcel Map), on which no dnve-thru uses may be perrrntted All dnve- thru development on Day Creek Boulevard shall be very well screened and designed to be consistent with the urban atmosphere of the Regional Center Bes~gn-Rewew- 5~l) The revised design for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard shall be per the Day Creek Master Plan Any revised design shall be subtect to Design Rewew Committee review The revised design may have reduced land area devoted to intersection enhancement, but the overall level of quality must be on par month the current design per the Day Creek Boulevard and Victona Arbors Master Plans Whatever design is established for the northeast comer shall apply to the other three comers as well 6)5) No compact parking spaces shall be allowed ~j6) The frontage of the site on Church Street at the northeast comer area of the site shall be designed as sensitively as possible relative to single-family homes planned to the north The Terra Vsta Town Center frontage along Church Street provides an excellent example to this type of sensitive buffer design ~7) The building on Parcel 68 shall comply with the building, parking and average landscape setbacks relative to Church Street per the Development Code 9)S) All environmental mitigation measures per the approved Mitigation Monitonng Program, shall apply G. /~.1 ~/y ~/QEV• ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 4 9) All envvonmental mitigation measures per the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program, shall apply 10) Within 45 days of City Council approval, a revised Master Plan text incorporating the changes regwred shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval Upon acceptance by the Cdy Planner, a total of 50 unbound, 3-hole punch copies of the Master Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Diwsion In addition, one camera-ready onginal (unbound) and one executable copy on a CDROM m Microsoft Word or Microsoft 11 shall be submitted 11) All interior streets, dnve aisles, and pedestnan pathways shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Amencans with Disabilities Act to the satisfaction of the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Bwiding Official 12) Only one freeway pylon sign shall be allowed for the Mall C project. Engmeenng Drvison THE ENGINEERING SPECIAL CONDITIONS SHALL TAKE ~ PRECEDENCE OVER ENGINEERING STANDARD CONDITIONS 1) Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway on/off ramps a) Provide a southbound off-ramp free nght-turn only lane with a "pork-chop" channelization island b) Construct a free nght-turn lane for eastbound Foothill Boulevard to southbound I-15 Freeway c) Modify traffic signal, as regwred 2) Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard a) Provide a westbound free nght-turn lane b) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet in length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide two eastbound left-tum lanes 420 feet in length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide a southbound free nght-tum lane 200 feet in length ~nnth a 120-foot taper e) Provide northbound and southbound bus bays on Day Creek Boulevard G, H, .Z /~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 5 f) Provide eastbound and westbound bus bays on Foothill Boulevard g) Provide three southbound left-tum lanes, one southbound through, and one southbound free nght-tum lane h) Provide an 8-foot wide median to serve as a pedestrian refuge on the north leg of this intersection subtect to City Engineer approval 3) Foothill Boulevard between I-15 Freeway and Day Creek Boulevard a) To be improved to the City's and Caltrans "Mator Divided Highway" standards (Typical mid-block section curb-to-curb = 20 x 12 x 12 x 14 x 14 x 14 x 12 x 12 x 20 feet, except at intersections) b) Provde curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required c) Provided raised landscaped medians d) Median openings will not be allowed between Day Creek Boulevard and I-15 Freeway e) Provide 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, as regwred f) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as required g) Provide signing and stnpmg, as regwred h) Foothill Boulevard, west of Day Creek Boulevard, shall be constructed full width and transitioned to loin existing subtect to City Engineer Approval 4) Day Creek Blvd at Victona Gardens Lane a) Provide a northbound free nght-tum lane b) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 200 feet m length with a 90-foot taper c) Provide a southbound left-tum lane 300 feet m length with a 90-foot taper d) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 3~0-320 feet in length ~nnth a 120-foot taper, one left and through shared lane, and a separate nght-tum lane The taper for the westbound nght-tum only lane shall begin at the ECR of Pnvate Dnve "A " ~_ G, N,s //~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 6 e) Provide a traffic signal 5) Day Creek Boulevard at Church Street a) Provide a northbound left-tum lane, three through lanes, and one separate nght-tum lane b) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 350 feet m length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide a northbound nght-tum lane 200 feet in length with a 60-foot taper d) Coordinate with the Amencan Beauty protect so that stnping wdl line up across this intersection e) Provide a traffic signal 6) Day Creek Boulevard at Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) a) Provide two southbound left-tum lanes 375 feet in length with a 120-foot taper b) Provide a northbound left-tum pocket 250 feet in length with a 90-foot taper c) Provide for northbound and southbound bus bays d) Provide a traffic signal 7) Day Creek Boulevard at Pnvate Dnve "V" (South Main) a) Provde a southbound left-tum pocket 3275 feet m length with a 120-foot taper b) No northbound left turns or eastbound left turns will be permitted c) No eastbound or westbound through traffic wdl be permitted d) Provide a traffic signal 8) Day Creek Boulevard between Foothtll Boulevard and Church Street a) To be improved to the City's "Mator Droided Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb =curb 16 x 11 x 13 x 14 x 13 x 11 x 16 feet, except at intersections) b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required c) Provide raised landscaped medians Median openings v~nll only be allowed at signalized intersections G, ~,s // 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 7 d) Provide bike lanes on Day Creek Boulevard e) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential, 9500 and commeraal 16,000 lumen HPSV) f) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as regwred g) Provide sigrnng and stnping, as regwred 9) Church Street at Victona Gardens Lane a) Provide an eastbound left-tum lane 200 feet in length with a 90-foot taper b) Provide a separate eastbound nght-tum only lane 200 feet in length with a 60-foot taper c) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 250 feet in length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide one northbound left-tum lane, one through lane and separate nght-turn lane e) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 3300 feet in length with a ~ ~ 120-foot taper f) Provide a traffic signal with northbound nght-tum overlap phasing g) Provide a continuous raised median island 4 feet in width on Victona Gardens Lane from Church Street to Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) The curb-to-curb width of the street shall be 68 feet 10) Church Street at "unnamed street" east of Victona Gardens Lane a) Provide a dnveway for the future development located on the southeast comer of Church Street and Vidona Gardens Lane This dnveway shall align with "unnamed street " b) Provide westbound left-tum lane 200 feet in length with a 90-foot taper 11) Church Street between Vidona Gardens Lane and Etiwanda Avenue a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Mator Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 20 x 12 x 14 x 12 x 20 feet, except at intersections) Modifications to the existing I-15 Freeway support system may be required b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required G, f~ Z / / 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 8 c) Provide a raised median on Church Street, between Victona Park Land and Etiwanda Avenue d) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential, 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) e) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as regwred f) Provide signing and stnpmg, as regwred g) Provide bike lanes on Church Street 12) Church Street between Victona Gardens Lane and Day Creek Channel a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Secondary Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 20 x 12 x 14 x 12 x 20 feet, except at intersections) b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential, 9500 and commercal 16,000 lumen HPSV) d) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as regwred e) Provide signing and stnpmg, as regwred f) Provide bike lanes on Church Street s) C 13) Victona Garden Lane at Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) a) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 300 feet m length with a 120-foot taper b) Provide a southbound left-tum lane 200 feet in length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide a continuous raised median island 4 feet in width from Private Dnve "L" (North Main) to 300 feet south of Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) The curb-to-curb width of the street shall be 68 feet d) Provide a traffic signal 14) Victona Gardens Lane at Pnvate Dnve "II" a) Provide an eastbound left-tum lane 300 feet m length with a 120-foot taper ~. ff, r / / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 9 b) Provide a traffic signal 15) Victona Gardens Lane at Pnvate Dnve "JJ" a) Provde an eastbound IeH-tum lane 260 feet in length with a 90-foot taper b) Provide a westbound left-tum lane 200 feet in length with a 90-foot taper c) Provide a raised median island 340 feet in length east of Pnvate Dnve "JJ " d) Provide a traffic signal 16) Victona Gardens Lane between Church Street and Day Creek Boulevard a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Mator Artenal" standards (fypipl mid-block section curb to curb = 64 feet (16 x 11 x 10 x 11 x 16 feet), or 68 feet where a raised median island is required b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) ~ d) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential 9500 and commeraal 16,000 lumen HPSV) e) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as required f) Provide signing and stnprng, as regwred g) Provide for bike lanes 17) Lot "B" (Arbor Lane) at Church Street a) Provide eastbound and westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet m length with a 90-foot taper b) The north/south through lanes must align and be coordinate with the Amencan Beauty Protect c) Provide two northbound left-tum lanes-200- 100 feet in length ~ ~- with a 120-foot taper d) Provide for bike lanes e) The first 50 feet of lane lines and curb south of Church L~ Street shall be parallel to the centerline. ~, f-~,_r ~ ~o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 10 f) Use a 20:1 taper for lanes and curb on Arbor Way from Church Street to Lot 'D' beyond the first 50 feet. 18) Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Lot MM, Lot KK, Lot D from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot B), Lot B and Victona Gardens Lane shall be public streets All other internal lettered lots shall be considered to be pnvate dnve aisles 19) Lot D from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot B) and Lot B shall be maintained by the Developer through a maintenance agreement approved by the City Engineer 20) The developer shall make a fair share contnbution for mitigation of Traffic impacts outside the tunsdiction of the City m the following amounts pnor to recordation of map a) Etiwanda Avenue at Slover Avenue - $10,700 b) Cherry Avenue at Base Line Road - $29,400 c) Cherry Avenue at Foothill Boulevard - $52,500 d ) , e) , $448;&34- 9) $~-~`v- h) , Foothill Boulevard at€ast- Etiwanda Avenue - $67,720 ~) Etiwanda Avenue at San Bernardino Avenue - $10,344 k) , 21) Traffic signals within the vicinity of this protect shall be interconnected Interconnect shall be provided to future signals 22) Provide an on-street master controller and telephone drop 23) Provide traffic signal coordination timing for the morning, noon, and rnght peak penods using the Synchro and Sim traffic software program Traffic model data shall be provided to the City on 3 5 diskettes ~~ i~ G ~, /-. ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 11 24) The City "Driveway Policy" shall be in accordance with the approved Master Plan on vctona Gardens Lane 25) Bus bays shall be provided at the following locations northbound and southbound on Day Creek Boulevard at Foothill Boulevard, Church ~_ Street, PfrvQte~~e-fMSle L~tt~L~t ", " ^^^' o^.,^•~ ~^„~ °~sle L~tt~ Let"V-"and North Main Street. 26) Bus Bays shall be provided eastbound and westbound on Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard trucks 27) A Fire Department access circular plan shall be approved by the Fire Department. 28) All crosswalks at intersections need to be setback at least 1-foot from traveled way This is to prevent pedestrians from being hit by parallel through traffic 29) Reaprocal access for ingress and egress is regwred-~-;a-t;'m prepe#res for all parcels not having access to a public street ~ 30) Internal private drive aisles a) Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveways, as required b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Provide signing and striping, as requred d) Driveways into parking lots shall be a minimum of 100 feet from intersections e) Only one mid-block pedestrian crossing wdl be permitted between street intersections fl 9) 4&-feet} 31) The street trees and walkway concepts along the publiGpnvate streets shall be approved as determined by the City Engineer ~f, T /ZZ. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 12 32) The developer shall install landscaping to Caltrans standard on the west side of the I-15 Freeway from westerly of the southbound I `~ off-ramp at Foothill Boulevard to Etiwanda Avenue, which vnll be maintained by Caltrans In the event that Caltrans does not accept the landscaping for maintenance, the developer shall provide for maintenance fora 20-year penod as approved by the City Engineer 33) Staff attempted to address all streets and intersections If any were overlooked, then those missed shall be designed with the general intent of the other locations around the mall 34) The CFD is constructing a large portion of the off-site facilities Any off-site regwrement not constructed with the CFD is subtect to developer-to-developer reimbursement Submit for reimbursement agreement within six months of acceptance by City or all nghts to reimbursements are void 35) Special medians, such as Foothill Boulevard medianer-Lane, v~nll regwre electncal power to facilitate community programming slated for the median/street 36) LMD areas shall have a maximum of 31 slopes with maximum retaining wall of 30 inches, except the east side of Day Creek Boulevard shall have maximum slope of 4 1 Top of slope and toe of slope shall have a minimum 1-foot flat area to pedestnan walkways, 2-foot flat area at top of slope for larger slopes, per City standard 37) Parkways shall be 2 percent from the top of the curb to the back of the walk 38) All utilities off-site and on-site shall be handled according to the underground utility policy Utilities on the opposite sides of the streets fronting the protect shall have fees paid in accordance with the policy Utilities on the protect side of the street fronting the protect shall be undergrounded in accordance with the policy 39) ~~ 40) /`f ~ ! ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 13 .°a e_ti.._...,~e ti.,~ ~ .,a ,tie Fie-P~evenNer~ ALL FIRE PREVENTION SPECIAL CONDITIONS WERE DELETED C AND REVISED FIRE PREVENTION STANDARD CONDITIONS WERE INSERTED. ~. ~~o..,...,, ae „~ ., , ~ ,~,,,..,, e,...,,... .tee ., ..~.,.~... ~~~~~ ~„~...,. Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) Varies total feet on Foothill Boulevard Varies total feet on Church Street Varies total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard Varies tot t o i toria Gardens Lane Varies total feet on Arbor La e 65 total feet on Lot D 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 Private drainage easements far cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 7 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map 8 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 9 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided 10 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the requred public improvements, and if he/she should fad to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter intc an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acgwres the property interests regwred for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City pnor to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Master Plan storm drain and off-site right-of-way P. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, streetlights, and street trees sc-~ ~ -o~ N,r /.37/38 -/-/- / /_ _/_I_ _/_/_ _/_/_ //- / / / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / / / / / / / -/-/- Protect No DA01-02 Comolebon Dale 2 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trad Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X c X X X Church Street X X X X X X X Da Creek Boulevard X X X X X X X X Ict Ia Gardens Lane X X X Arbor Lane X X X X X Lot D X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Ctvll Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Ctty Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch (at Intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Clty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check SC-11-01 / / -/ ~- / / / / / / / / / / / / Protect No DA01-02 Comolehon Date T. Utilities 1 Provide separate utddy services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Ftre Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them U. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Pnor to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Distract TBA among the newly created parcels 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agences for work within their right-of-way SBCFCD and Caltrans 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, pnor to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit issuance tf no map is involved 4 Pnor to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED / / / / / / _~-~. / / / / -~-~- sc.,, -o, , z au, ~ "' FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT l ~ • ` ~• r"" FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0507-B PROJECT #: DA 01-02 PROJECT NAME: Vlctorla Garden Regional Center DATE: January 17, 2002 PLAN TYPE: Commerical/Industrial APPLICANT NAME: Forest City OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group M, B, A (Mixed uses FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION• LOCATION: North of Foothill between Day Creek and I-15 FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locate, Flre Protection Planrnnp Specialist PLANNER: Brent Le Count ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following comments and conditions represent the minimum standard for Fire District approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based upon review of the plans submitted Although we have tried, not all Fire District requirements for the proposed protect may be included Additions to or changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Division to obtain Fire District approval If your protect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Communty Faahties Districts 1 Required Note: The protect is located within a "Mello-Roos" Community Facilities District for fire protection services B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submd construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 3 Regwred Note• When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire Flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 4 Required Note: The requred fire Flow for this protect shall be 4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes one fire hydrant is regwred per 1000 gallons of regwred fire flow 5 Regwred Note: The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 6 Public fire hydrants located with a 500-foot radius of the proposed may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 7 If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the bwldmg permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, that shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 8 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. WaterAvailabihty 1 Regwred Note: Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avadabdrtv for Fire Piotect~on Form shall be completed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract If sufficient water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow D. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Required Note Conditions set by the Fire District during the Envvonmental Impact Review to mitigate the impact on public fire protection services require that ALL structures and bwldings regwre the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system E. Fire Access 1 Required Note• Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the bwldmg is located more than 150-feet from an approved fire district vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwldmg 2 Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets and designated fire lanes 3 Commercial/Industrial and Multi-family Residential-Required Note Prior the issuance of any grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans and specification for the approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site 4 Roadways and Fire Lanes-Required Note Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets, courts and cul-de-sacs from the Fire Distract in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow fine to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds ff r I Y3 shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire Distract, Fire Safety Dmsion 5 Private Roadways and Frre Lanes-Required Note The inside turn radus shall be 20 feet The outside tum radius shall be not less than 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet The minimum unobstructed width for a Frre District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 6 Dead~end Frre District Access Roadways-Requrred Note Dead-end Fire Distrid access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the fuming around of fire apparatus This may include a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District 7 Requrred Note All portions of the faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are an obstruction 8 Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior building openings 9 Required Note All buildings that have three or more stories, or are 30 feet in height shall be provided with fire apparatus access on at least two sides Access to exterior walls shall extend from 5 to 50 feet horizontally, vnth no vertical obstructions 10 Knox Rapid Entry System A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fve Safety Division for specific details and ordering information 11 Required Note: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 12 A bwlding or site directory shall be required, as noted below Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site Standard directory in bwlding lobby Other 13 Requrred Note Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 14 Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width When Fire Lanes are required by the Fire District the plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 15 New buldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 16 In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwlding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or buldings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga F. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Requrred Note Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply G~-,s ~YY for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire Distract Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. G. Architectural Bwlding Plans Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fue District Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for any required notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal H. Fire District Service Fees* 1 The following fees may be applicable to this protect and are being identified at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs ether comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subject to approval by the Fire Distract The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division ** $82 Start-up fee for commercal, industrial ormulti-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $66 Fire District Access Review (Includes Fire Lane Plans) $132 Minor Development Review Fee (MDR) (RemodelfTenant Improvement) $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new bulding) for New Commercial and Industrial Development " Plus a microfiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division * Note Separate plan check fees wilt be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 2 The following service fees are due to the Fire District and payable at this time. $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial ormulti-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Fire District Review of Tract or Parcel Maps other than Single-family Residential Tract $214 -Total due at this time. Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract " ** Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fve Safety Division *Note• Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans I. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Speaal Permits may be regwred, dependent upon approved use(s) General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property b Operate a place of public assembly To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the regwred fire district access roadway This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fire District response G; ~L iyy~ d High piled combustible storage e Candles and open flame in public assembly J. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at hme of submittal of plans K. Other Fire District Requirements or Comments 1 NOTE Compliance with Fire District mitigation measures identified in Environmental Impact Report Fire Distract Conditions of Approval- Template SL 10124/Ot Revision G' ~~,s / Yyl3 RESOLUTION NO 02-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 01-01 CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM REGIONAL CENTER TO MIXED USE AND MODIFYING VARIOUS TEXTAND GRAPHICS IN THE COMMUNITY PLAN TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED PROJECT KNOWN AS THE VICTORIA GARDENS ON APPROXIMATELY 175 ACRES OF LANDAND IS GENERALLY BOUNDED BY FUTURE CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, 1-15 TO THE EAST, AND THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 Forest City Development California, Inc ,filed an application for Victona Community Plan Amendment 01-01 as desatbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victona Community Amendment is referred to as 'Yhe application " 2 On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on January 9, and January 23, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together vwth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 175 acres of land, generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, the I-15 Freeway to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and is presently undeveloped Said property rs currently designated as Regional Related Commeraal, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is designated Muced Use, and is partially developed with a winery, undeveloped land, which is approved for single-family residential development vnthin the Amencan Beauty project The property to the west is designated Regional Related Commercial/Office and Utildy Comdor, and is undeveloped The I-15 Freeway lies immediately to the east wrath the land further east designated Low-Medwm Residential and Medwm Residential vnthin the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, and Regional Related Commeraal, and is undeveloped Foothill Boulevard lies to the south with vacant property further south designated Regional Related Office/Commeraal ~~l /~`s PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-21 VCPA 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 2 c The applicant contemplates changing the subtect site to Mixed Use as shown and attached hereto as Exhibit "A,"and modify vanous text and graphics of the Vidona Community Plan as shown as shown as Exhibit "D" in the staff report d This amendment does not conflict vwth the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and vnll prowde for development wnthin the distnct in a manner consistent month the General Plan and v~nth related development The General Plan designates the property as Muced Use, and This amendment promotes the goals and obtectrves of the Land Use Element, and f This amendment would not be matenally in~unous or detnmental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a That the subtect property is swtable for the uses permitted in the proposed distnct in feints of access, size, and compatibd~ty ~nnth existing land use in the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties, and That the proposed amendment is in conformance v~nth the General Plan 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victona Community Amendment 01-01, changing the land use as shown in Exhibit "A,"vanous text and graphics changes to the Victona Community Plan as shown in Exhibit "D" in the staff report The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Lary T McNiel, Chairnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary ~ y, s ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-21 VCPA 01-01 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the follomnng vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMI551ONER5 ABSENT COMMISSIONERS u • RESOLUTION NO 01-22 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15716, A REQUESTTO SUBDIVIDE 175 ACRES OF LAND INTO 97 PARCELS AND 39 LETTERED LOTS (PRIVATE AND PUBLIC STREETS) TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED PROJECT KNOWN AS THE VICTORIA GARDENS ON APPROXIMATELY 175 ACRES OF LAND AND IS GENERALLY BOUNDED BY FUTURE CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, I-15 FREEWAY TO THE EAST, AND THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN 227-161-35, 36 AND 36, 227-171-22 AND 23, 227-201-30, 33, 35, AND 36, AND 227-211-24 AND 39 THRU 43 A Rectals 1. Forest City Development California Inc filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map 15716 as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subiect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 9, and continued to January 23, 2002, the Planning Commission of the Cily of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on January 9, and January 23, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property generally bounded by future Church Street to the north, future Victoria Gardens Lane and the I-15 Freeway to the east, Foothill Boulevard to the south, and future Day Creek Boulevard to the west, the site is presently vacant, unimproved land b The property to the north of the subbed site consists of vacant land planned for single-family residential development vnthin the American Beauty Developmentwithin the Muced Use district, Foothill Boulevard lies immediately to the south with the property to the south across Foothill Boulevard consisting of vacant, unimproved property wdh a Regionally Related Office/Commerual designation, the property to the east is vacant to be designated Mixed Use per the related Victoria Community Plan Amendment 01-01 and the I-15 Freeway, and the property to the west consists of • the vacant land and existing single-family residential development commonly referred to as the Rochester Tract vwth a Mixed Use and Low-Medium Density residential designation PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent wrath the Victona Community Plan and the General Plan b That no improvements are proposed wrath this subdivision, which is intended for finanang and conveyance purposes only That the site is physically suitable for the proposed future development d That the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028," together with all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment beyond those impacts related to air quality and trafficthat are significant and unavoidable and vvill, therefore, necessitate a Statement of Ovemding Considerations • by the City Council a That the "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028," has been prepared in compliance v~nth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Environmental Impact Report prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Environmental Impact Report wrath regard to the application b The "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028," identifies that all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect with the exception of those impacts related to air quality and traffic that are significant and unavoidable and will, therefore, necessitate a Statement of Ovemdmg Considerations by the City Council c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028" forthe protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the "Final Environmental Impact Report for Victona Gardens SCH No 2001031028," the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations and recommends that the City Councl adopt a Statement of Ovemding Considerations relative to significant unavoidable impacts • related to air quality and traffic 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and the standard conditions attached incorporated hereto by this reference ~ ~/, z / `~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 3 Planning Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Gty, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Gty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The Gty may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) This Tentative Parcel Map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed wrath the Gty Engineer within three years from the date of the approval 3) All Conditions of Approval contained in Development Agreement 01-02 shall apply 4) The approval of Tentative Parcel Map 15716 shall be contingent upon, and shall not be effective until, the Ordinance approving Development Agreement 01-02 is effective 5) The future budding to be located on Parcel 68 shall comply wrath the building, parking, and average landscape setbacks per the Development Code 6) All environmental mitigation measures per the approved Mitigation Monitonng Program, shall apply 7) All intenor streets, dnve aisles, and pedestnan pathways shall comply wrath the applicable provisions of the Amencans with Disabilities Act to the satisfaction of the Gty Planner, City Engineer, and City Budding OffiGal Enoineenng Division 1) Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway on/off ramps a) Provide a southbound off-ramp free nght-turn only lane with a "pork-chop" channelization island b) Construct a free nght-turn lane for eastbound Foothill Boulevard to southbound I-15 Freeway c) Modify traffic signal, as required ~, N, L ~S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 4 2) Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard a) Provide a westbound free nght-tum lane b) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet in length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide two eastbound left-tum lanes 420 feet in length with a 120-foot taper d) Prowde a southbound free nght-tum lane 200 feet in length wdh a 120-foot taper e) Provide northbound and southbound bus bays on Day Creek Boulevard f) Prowde eastbound and westbound bus bays on Foothill Boulevard g) Provide three southbound left-tum lanes, one southbound through, and one southbound free nght-tum lane h) Provide an 8-foot wide median to serve as a pedestnan refuge on the north leg of this intersection or provide an overhead pedestnan bodge across the east leg of this mtersecbon, or other appropnate pedestnan crossing subject to City Engineer approval 3) Foothill Boulevard between I-15 Freeway and Day Creek Boulevard a) To be improved to the City's and Caltrans "Mator Divided Highway' standards (Typical mid-block section curb-to-curb = 20 x12x12x14x14x14x12x12x20feet, except at intersections) b) Prowde curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required c) Provided raised landscaped medians d) Median openings will not be allowed between Day Creek Boulevard and I-15 Freeway e) Provide 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, as required f) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as requred g) Provide sigrnng and sloping, as requred PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 5 h) Foothill Boulevard, west of Day Creek Boulevard, shall be constructed full wndth and transitioned to loin ewsting subject to City Engineer Approval 4) Day Creek Blvd at vctona Gardens Lane a) Prowde a northbound free nght-tum lane b) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 200 feet in length wrath a 90-foot taper c) Provide a southbound left-tum lane 300 feet in length wrath a 90-foot taper d) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 350 feet in length wrath a 120-foot taper, one left and through shared lane, and a separate nght-tum lane The taper for the westbound nght-tum only lane shall begin at the ECR of Pnvate Dnve "A." e) Provide a traffic signal 5) Day Creek Boulevard at Church Street . a) Prowde a northbound left-tum lane, three through lanes, and one separate nght-tum lane b) Prowde a northbound left-tum lane 350 feet in length with a 120-foot taper c) Prowde a northbound nght-tum lane 200 feet in length wrath a 60-foot taper d) Coordinate v~nth the Amencan Beauty project so that stnpmg will Ime up across this intersection e) Prowde a traffic signal 6) Day Creek Boulevard at Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) a) Prowde two southbound left-tum lanes 375 feet in length with a 120-foot taper b) Prowde a northbound left-tum pocket 250 feet in length with a 90-foot taper c) Prowde for northbound and southbound bus bays d) Prowde a traffic signal PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC • January 23, 2002 Page 6 7) Day Creek Boulevard at Pnvate Dnve "V" (South Main) a) Provide a southbound left-tum pocket 350 feet rn length with a 120.foot taper b) No northbound left turns or eastbound left turns will be permitted c) No eastbound or westbound through traffic vwll be permitted d) Provide a traffic signal 8) Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street a) To be improved to the Citys "Mator Divided Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb =curb 16 x 11 x 13 x 14 x 13 x 11 x 16 feet, except at intersections) b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required c) Provide raised landscaped medians Median openings vwll only be allowed at signalized intersections • d) Provide bike lanes on Day Creek Boulevard e) Provide streetlights, as required (residential, 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) f) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as required g) Provide signing and stnprng, as regwred 9) Church Street at Victona Gardens Lane a) Provide an eastbound left-turn lane 200 feet rn length with a 90-foot taper b) Provide a separate eastbound nght-turn only lane 200 feet rn length with a 60-foot taper c) Provide two westbound left-turn lanes 250 feet rn length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide one northbound left-turn lane, one through lane and separate right-turn lane e) Provrde a northbound left-turn lane 350 feet in length with a • 120.foot taper f) Provrde a traffic signal with northbound nght-turn overlap phasing ~~,z /~-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 7 g) Provide a continuous raised median island 4 feet rn vwdth on Victona Gardens Lane from Church Street to Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Mam) The curb-to-curb width of the street shall be 68 feet 10) Church Street at "unnamed street" east of Viclona Gardens Lane a) Prowde a dnveway for the future development located on the southeast comer of Church Street and Victona Gardens Lane This dnveway shall align with "unnamed street " b) Provide westbound left-tum lane 200 feet rn length vwth a 90-foot taper 11) Church Street between Victona Gardens Lane and Etiwanda Avenue a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Malor Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 20 x 12 x 14 x 12 x 20 feet, except at intersections) Modifications to the exrstmg I-15 Freeway support system may be regwred b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) Provide a raised median on Church Street, between Victona Park Land and Etrwanda Avenue d) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential, 9500 and commercal 16,000 lumen HPSV) e) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Trme" signs, as required f) Prowde signing and stnping, as regwred g) Prowde bike lanes on Church Street 12) Church Street between Vidona Gardens Lane and Day Creek Channel a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Secondary Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 20x 12 x 14 x 12 x 20 feet, except at intersections) b) Prowde curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) Prowde streetlights, as required (residential, 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) d) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Trme" signs, as regwred e) Provide sigrnng and stnping, as regwred ~ Prowde bike lanes on Church Street r~ LJ • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, iNC January 23, 2002 Page 8 g) Reconstruct Church Street from Day Creek Channel west to Rochester Avenue, as determined by the City Engineer 13) Victona Garden Lane at Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) a) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 300 feet in length month a 120-foot taper b) Provide a southbound left-tum lane 200 feet in length month a 120.foot taper c) Prowde a continuous raised median island 4 feet in vndth from Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) to 300 feet south of Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) The curb-to-curb width of the street shall be 68 feet d) Prowde a traffic signal 14) Victona Gardens Lane at Pnvate Dnve "II" a) Provide an eastbound left-tum lane 300 feet m length with a 120-foot taper. b) Prowde a traffic signal 15) Victona Gardens Lane at Pnvate Dnve "JJ" a) Prowde an eastbound left-tum lane 260 feet m length vwth a 90.foot taper b) Prowde a westbound left-tum lane 200 feet m length vwth a 90.foot taper c) Prowde a raised median island 340 feet m length east of Pnvate Dnve "JJ " d) Prowde a traffic signal 16) Victona Gardens Lane between Church Street and Day Creek Boulevard a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Mayor Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 64 feet (16 x 11 x 10 x 11 x 16 feet), or 68 feet where a raised median island is regwred b) Prowde curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) Prowde a two-way left-tum lane from "C" Street to North Main PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 9 d) Provide streetlights, as required (residential 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) e) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as requred f) Provide signing and striping, as regwred g) Provide for bike lanes 17) Lot "B" (Arbor Lane) at Church Street a) Provide eastbound and westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet m length with a 90-foot taper b) The north/south through lanes must align and be coordinate v~nth the American Beauty Protect c) Provide two northbound left-tum lanes 200 feet m length vmth a 120-foot taper d) Provide for bike lanes 18) Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Lot MM, Lot KK, Lot D from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot B), Lot B and Victoria Gardens Lane shall be public streets All other internal lettered lots shall be considered to be private drive aisles 19) Lot D from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot B) and Lot B shall be maintained by the Developer through a maintenance agreement approved by the City Engineer 20) The developer shall make a fair share contribution for mitigation of Traffic impacts outside the ~unsd~ction of the Gty m the following amounts prior to recordation of map a) Etiwanda Avenue at Slover Avenue - $10,700 b) Cherry Avenue at Base Lme Road - $29,400 c) Cherry Avenue at Foothill Boulevard - $52,500 d) Milliken Avenue at SR-210 Freeway Eastbound Ramps - $2,568 e) Fourth Street at I-15 Freeway Southbound Ramps - $7,061 f) Day Creek Boulevard at SR-210 Freeway Westbound Ramps - $149,631 g) Day Creek Boulevard at SR-210 Freeway Eastbound Ramps - $11,415 ~, gas ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 . TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 10 h) Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway Southbound Ramps- $86,807 it Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue - $67,720 ~) Etrvvanda Avenue at San Bernardino Avenue - $10,344 k) Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange - $4,543,974 21) Traffic signals within the vicinity of this protect shall be interconnected Interconnect shall be provided to future signals 22) Provide an on-street master controller and telephone drop 23) Provide traffic signal coordination timing for the morning, noon and night peak penods using the Synchro and Sim traffic software program Traffic model data shall be provided to the City on 3 5 diskeries 24) The City "Dnveway Policy" shall apply for all proposed dnveways on Victona Gardens Lane 25) Bus bays shall be provided at the follov~nng locations northbound and . southbound on Day Creek Boulevard at Foothill Boulevard, Church Street, Pnvate Dnve Aisle Letter Lot "L", and Pnvate Dnve Aisle Letter Lot "V " 26) Bus Bays shall be provided eastbound and westbound on Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard 27) All internal pnvate intersections shall allow for left and nght-turn of fire tNCkS 28) All crosswalks at intersections need to be setback at least 1-foot from traveled way This is to prevent pedestnans from being hit by parallel through traffic 29) ReGprocal access for ingress and egress across all parcels are requned due to the properties not having access to a public street 30) Internal pnvate dnve aisles a) Prowde curb, gutter, sidewalk and dnveways, as regwred b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Provide signing and stnping, as regwred • d) Dnveways into parking lots shall be a minimum of 100 feet from intersections ~~ /, Z ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 • Page 11 e) Only one mid-block pedestnan crossing will be permitted between street intersections f) The minimum curb-to-curb width where angled parking is desired on one side of the street is 44 feet (13 feet, 15 feet, and 16 feet) g) The minimum curb-to-curb width where angle parking is desired on both sides of the street is 62' (16 feet, 15 feet, 15 feet, and 16 feet) 31) The street trees and walkway concepts along the public/pnvate streets shall be approved as determined by the City Engineer 32) The developer shall install landscaping to Caltrans standard on the west side of the I-15 Freeway from Foothill Boulevard to Etiwanda Avenue which will be maintained by Caltrans In the event that Caltrans does not accept the landscaping for maintenance, the developer shall provide for maintenance fora 20-year penod as approved by the Gty Engineer 33) Staff attempted to address all streets and intersections If any were overlooked, then those missed shall be designed with the general intent • of the other locations around the mall 34) The CFD is constructing a large portion of the off-site facilities Any off-site regwrement not constructed with the CFD is subtect to developer-to-developer reimbursement Submit for reimbursement agreement within suc months of acceptance by City or all nghts to reimbursements are void 35) SpeGal medians, such as Foothill Boulevard median or Arbor Lane, vwll regwre electncal power to facilitate community programming slated for the median/street 36) LMD areas shall have a maximum of 31 slopes with maximum retaining wall of 30 inches, except the east side of Day Creek Boulevard shall have maximum slope of 4 1 Top of slope and toe of slope shall have a minimum 1-foot flat area to pedestnan walkways (2-foot flat area at top of slope for larger slopes per City standard 37) Parkways shall be 2 percent from the top of the curb to the back of the walk 38) All utilities off-site and on-site shall be handled according to the underground utility policy Utilities on the opposite sides of the streets fronting the protect shall have fees paid in accordance v~nth the policy Utilities on the protect side of the street fronting the protect shall be • undergrounded in accordance with the policy ~, y s ~S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 . TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 12 39) The developer may be required to sign a consent and waiver forte to loin and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Fatalities Distnct as determined by the City Engineer pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 40) Complete all street frontage improvements (to center line of street) and intenor street improvements at the developer's own cost The developer is eligible for transportation fee credit and/or reimbursement for those fatalities that are part of the program Request for reimbursement shall be applied for within soc months of completion of the improvements or ail nghts to reimbursement shall be nullified. The developer shall also complete all off-site street improvements as regwred by the Conditions of Approval Said off-site are eligible for transportation fee credit and reimbursement subtect to the adopted program or eligible for developer-to-developer reimbursement Both fortes of reimbursement shall be applied for within suc months of completion of the street improvements or all nghts to reimbursement shall be nullified The development is responsible to reimburse other development if they install any frontage improvements Installation of improvements and fair share cost will be proportioned by the CFD documents Developer-to-developer reimbursements will have to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in companson with the improvements within the CFD Fire Prevention 1) The protect is located within a "Mello-Roos" Community Fatalities Distnct for fire protection services 2) Pnor to issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distnct and the Water Distnct 3) Pnor to the issuance of any budding permits, the applicant shall submit construction plans, spetafitaations, flow test data, and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall complywith Fire Distnctstandards Contact the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire Distnct Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 4) When any portion of a facility or budding is located more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line-of-sight 5) The required fire flow for this protect shall be 4,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appends III-A, as ~/,Z ~S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716-FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 13 amended For planning purposes, one fire hydrant is regwred per 1,000 gallons of regwred fire flow. 6) The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance vnth Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 7) Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subject to Fire Distnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provde regwred fire flow 8) If the system is pnvate, the applicant shall do the following pnor to the issuance of the budding permit a) Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the Distnct b) For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reGprocal maintenance agreement that shall be submitted to the Fire Distnct for acceptance 9) Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct and City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~ Engineenng Standard Plan 134, Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On pnvate property, these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner 10) Pnor to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct Water Avadabd~ty for Fne Protection Form shall be completed by the Water Distnct and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct If sufficient water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow 11) All commercal or industnal structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies v~nth an occupant load of 50 or more persons, multi-family residential structures, and all structures that do not meet Fire Distnct access regwrements (See Fire Access below) shall be protected by an approved automatic fire spnnkler system 12) Pnor to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commercial or industnal structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies wrath an occupant load of 50 or more persons, multi-family residential structures, and all structures that do not meet Fire Distract access regwrements (See Fire ~~ ~/ T ~6 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 • TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 14 Access below) shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fve District 13) Fire Drstnd access roadways shall be provided for every fadlity, budding, or portion of a budding constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the bwldrng rs located more than 150-feet from an approved fire district vehide access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or budding 14) Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets, and designated fire lanes 15) Commercial/Industrial and Multi-family Residential Regwred Note Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map or the issuance of any grading pennd, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans and specification for the approval of the Fire District for all Frre District access roadways v~nthin 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site • 16) Roadways and Fire Lanes Regwred Note Prior to issuance of any grading pennds, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets, courts, and cul-de-sacs from the Fire Drstnd m consultation wdh the Grading Commiriee The plans shall indude the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the vndth of the street or court measured flow Ime to flow Ime All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be dearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwnse regwred Applicable CCBR's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions, such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modfications in fin: lanes or access roadways v~nthout pnorwntten approval of the Fire Drstnd, Fie Safety Dmsion 17) Private Roadways and Fire Lanes Regwred Note The inside turn radws shall be 20 feet The outside turn radws shall be not less than 50 feet The mirnmum radws for cul-de-sacs rs 45 feet The mrrnmum unobstructed vwdth for a Fve Drstnd access roadway orfire lane is 26 feet The mirnmum vertical dearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry, the minimum median vndth of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 18) Dead~nd Fire Drstnd Access Roadways Required Note Dead-end Fire District access roadways rn excess of 150 feet shall be provided vath approved provisions for the fuming around of fire apparatus This may indude a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire Drstnd • ~;, y, /~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 15 19) All portions of the faGidy or any portion of the extenor wall of the first story shall be located wdhin 150 feet of Fire Distract vehide access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the extenor of the bwlding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are an obstruction 20) Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to extenor budding opernngs 21) All bwldings that have three or more stones or are 30 feet in height shall be provided wdh fire apparatus access on at feast two sides Access to extenor walls shall extend from 5 to 50 feet honzontaly, wdh no vertical obstructions 22) Knox Rapid Entry System A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed pnor to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted pnor to final budding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordenng information 23) Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trammed to a mirnmum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehides • 24) A budding or sde directory shall be regwred, as noted below a) Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the sde b) Standard directory in budding lobby 25) Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in vndth and 14 feet, 6 inches rn height shall be provided and maintained free and Gear of any obstructions at all times dunng construdron, in accordance wdh Fire Distnd Standards 26) Pnor to the issuance of a bwlding pernd, the applicant shall submd plans and obtain approval from the Fire Distract for fire lanes on regwred Fire Distract access roadway less than 40 feet in vkndth The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drav~nng of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be submtted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "Fire Distract Access -Fire Lanes" standard 27) New bwldings otherthansingle-family dwellings shall post the address wdh mirnmum &inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncally illuminated dunng pencils of darkness When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an adddional non- dluminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 16 28) In multi-umt complexes approved address numbers, and/or budding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, sudes, or buddrngs The Fire Distnct shall review and approve the numbenng plan in coordination vwth the City of Rancho Cucamonga 29) Pnor to the issuance of a budding permit for combustible construction, the budder shall submit a letter to the Fire Distnct on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadwaythat meets Fire Drstnct Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible matenal is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times 30) Pnor to the issuance of a budding perrmt the applicant shall submit plans for the rewew and approval of the Fire Distnct Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for any required notes to be placed on the plans pnor to submittal 31) The folloHnng fees may be applicable to this protect and are being rdentfied at this time to assist the applicant in planrnng for future costs Other comments rn this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subject to approval by the Fire Distract The fees for these add~Uonal plan rewews are to be paid at the Ume plans submitted When the regwred plans are submitted the folloHnng fees vhll be assessed by the Frre Safety Division, plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Diwsion a) $82 Start-up fee for commeroral, industrial, or multr-family dwelling unds (Paid pnor to TRC) b) $66 Frre Drstnct Access Revew (tndudes Fire Lane Plans) c) $132 Minor Development Revew Fee (MDR) (RemodeUTenant Improvement). d) $132 Conditional Use Perind Fee (CUP) e) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection f1 $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fin: Sprinkler Underground Water Supply g) $677 (per new bwlding) for New Commerraal and Industrial Development Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services umt for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extrngwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submttal of plans -~/, z ~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 17 32) The following service fees are due to the Fire Distnd and payable at this time, plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division a) $82 Start-up fee for commeraal, industnal or multi-famiy dwelling units (Paid poor to TRC) b) $132 Fire Distnct Review of Tract or Parcel Maps other than Single- famiy Residential Tract c) $214 -Total due at this time Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct " Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fin: protection systems (fire spnnklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 33) As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) a) General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically descnbed below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that maybe hazardous to life or property b) Operate a place of public assembly c) To install any access control device, system, or any matenal under, upon or within the required fire distnct access roadway This includes any gate, bamer, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump, or any device that delays or slows Fire Distnct response d) High pled combustible storage e) Candles and open flame in public assembly 34) Plans shall be submitted and approved poor to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes and 1999 Electncal and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards Note In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fin; protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at Ume of submittal of plans 35) Compliance with Fire Distnct mitigation measures identfiied in • Environmental Impact Report G,~,T ~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 18 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiei, Chaimtan ATTEST- Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing 12esolu4loh was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarhohga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of Jahi~'dry 2002, by the folloHnng vote-to-~nnt AYES. COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENl~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: VICTORIA GARDENS REGIONAL CENTER SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15716 APPLICANT: FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND I-15 FREEWAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements ComoleGOn Date• 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, _/_/_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No 15716 is granted subject to the approval of DA01-02 _/_/_ and VCPA01-01 3 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval and all Standard Conditions, shall be included m _/_/_ legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 This tentatrve tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved Victoria _/_/_ Gardens Master Plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Commurnty Plan . 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _/_/_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC.,,-0, ,~; ~L ~~ C Project No TPM15716 Comolehon Date 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code _/_/_ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Budding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwldmg, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 5 Approval of this request shall not waroe compliance with all sections of the Development _I_/_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance beyond the associated amendments to the Victoria Community Plan and the Development Agreement 01-02 6 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall _/_/_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berning, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 7 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map 8 A detailed plan indicating Vail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and _/_/_ weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to approval and recordation of the Final Parcel Map and pnor to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements 9 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer rewew and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 10 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of _/_/_ all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 11 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage _/_/_ space shall be provided 12 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be _/_/_ manufactured products D. Shopping Centers 1 The Master Plan is approved Future development for (each bwldmg pad/parcel) shall be _/_I_ subtect to separate DevelopmenUDesign Review process for Planning Commission approval Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subtect to Planning Commission approval 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the _/_I_ Cdy Planner a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the protect) _I_/_ b Separate pedestrian access that does not regwre the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins _/_I_ Protect No TPM16716 Comoleoon Date E. d Roll-up doors _/_/_ e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids _/_/~ f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis _/_/_ g Chain Irnk screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and _/ /_ designed to be hidden from view 3 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours _/_/_ 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash /_/_ and debris remain for more than 24 hours 5 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking _/_/_ only " 6 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/ /_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 d6 during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, _/_/_ closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar obtects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 7 Textured pavement shall be provided across arculation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza _/_/_ They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 8 All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control Detailed plans shall _/_/_ be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall inGude the _/_/_ plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures 10 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend /_/_ into the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space _/_/_ abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be _/_/_ provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, _/_/_ entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards sc-11-01 s~u~ /(~, Protect No TPM15716 Comolehon Date 5 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and • Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pnor to issuance of bwlding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 6 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office faalities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 7 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet 8 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects or more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 9 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet Trip Reduction 1 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and single-family developments of 500 or more units 2 Shower facility accessible to both men and women shall be provided for persons walking or bicycling to work for each protect which meets the following thresholds Commeraal 250,000 square feet Industrial 325,000 square feet Office 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels 250 rooms G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24- inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of . one tree per 30 linear feet of building -~-~- -~-~- / / / / / / -/-/. -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- / / Protect No TPM15716 ComoleLOn Date 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more rn vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than _/_/_ 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or _/_/_ greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks to excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent trrigatton system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible _/_/_ for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained to healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 6 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, _/_/_ meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along all public street frontages 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public nghtof-way on _/_/_ the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division _/_/ 11 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and /_/_ approval prior to issuance of budding permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 13 On projects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping within the _/_/_ freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared rn conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way H. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner rn the amount of 1 000 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit 2 In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i e) beyond final certificate of occupancy), _/_/ the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner ~ prior to issuance of budding permits Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented SC-11-01 5 v/ r~,L ~ ~ b Protect No TPM15716 Comolehon Date Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mad boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Diwston Protect Number (t e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fenang and/or walls 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 5 Business shall not open for operation poor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division K. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction Ali plans shall be marked with the project file number (i e , TPM15716) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Budding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the trine of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Diviston for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Dvision prior to permit issuance 3 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are~ot limited to Transportation Development sc-11-01 6~~,1 ~ 7~ _/_/ / / / / / / I / / / / / / / -/-/- Pro~ecl No TPM15716 Comoletlon Daffi Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance 4 Street addresses shall be provided by the Budding Official, after tract/parcel map recordation -/-l- and pnor to issuance of bwlding permits 5 ConsWcbon activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday -/-/- through Saturday, with no consWcbon on Sunday or holidays 6 Construct Vash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public -/-/- counter) L. Gra ding 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Budding Code, City -/-/- Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to -/-/- perform such work 3 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of bwiding -/ /- pennds 4 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for -/-/- existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Cahfomia Registered Crvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated tc the City for all interior public streets, -/-/- community Vails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedicetion shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured /-/- from street centerline) Vanes total feet on Foothill Boulevard -/-/- Varies total feet on Church Street -/-/- Varies total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard -/-/- Varies total feet on Victoria Gardens Lane -/-/- 3 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per Cdy Standards -/-/- 4 Recprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or -I-/- by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, where no map is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint ' -/-/- s or maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R deeds and shall be recorded pnor to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated -/-/ or noted on the final map 7 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on -/-/- the final map y Z ~ ~~ 7 6 5~.,,-0, , Prgecl No TPM15716 Comoleilon Date • N M 8 Easements for public sidewalks andlor street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Clty 9 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adtacent sidewalk is used along the right tum lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided 10 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests regwred for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Master Plan Storm Drain and off-site right-of-way Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail ether Foothill Boulevard x x c x x x Church Street x x x x x x x Day Creek Boulevard x x x x x x x x Victoria Gardens Lane x x x x x x x provided for this item Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and ovedays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be 3 Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andlor private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer -/-/- I / / / / / I I -/-/- / I / / SC-11-01 8 ~j'/~~ / I Probed No TPM15716 Comolehon Date O. d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or _/_/_ reconstruction pro/ect along ma/or or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwnng construction shall remain oop~en to Vaffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane cldsure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drams shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h SVeet names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan _/_/_ check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Intersection Irne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Cdy Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all pro/ect . intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required 6 A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way _/_/_ Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards _/_/_ shall be submitted to the Cary Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, Vails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District the medians within the perimeter public streets not constructed with theCFD 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared _/_/_ cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All regwred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_I_ developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landsceping on the following street(s) shall conforn to the results of the respective _/_I_ Beautification Master Plan Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards 5~.,,-0, 9 G,N,L / 7~ Protect No TPM15716 Comole6on Date Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to Tina map approval or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faaltties shall be installed as requred by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 3 A permd from the San Bemardino County Flood Control District is required for work within rts right-of-way 4 Trees are prohibited wtthin 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 5 Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street Q. Improvement Completion 1 If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for Parcel Mao 15716 R. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred . 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water d~stnct within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdmston or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them S. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District TEA among the newly created parcels 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agences for work within their right-of-way SBCFCD and Caltrans 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to budding permit issuance if no map is involved 4 Prior to finalization of any development phase, suffiaent improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage • protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot Imes shown on the approved tentative map -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- /_/_ -~-~- _~_~ -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~_~. SC-11-01 10~n~~ ~ I Project No TPM15716 (somolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING • CONDITIONS: T. Community Facilities Districts 1 This prolect is subject to the requrements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District _/ /_ U. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the _/_/_ locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water Distract 2 Prior to the issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, _/ /_ speafications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract standards 3 Fire flow requirements for this prolect shall be 4~ gallons per minute at a minimum _/_/_ residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 Existing fire hydrants and mains Nnthin 600 feet of the prolect shall be shown on the water _/_/ plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 5 Regwred Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the _/_/_ issuance of the building permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 6 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue _/_/_ reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation o/ Reflective Hydrant Markers " On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner V. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate _/_/_ fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract Water Availabilrtv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow W. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupanaes with _/_/_ an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access regwrements (FP5), shall be protected by . an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 2 Regwred Note Pnor to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map _/_/_ stating that all commercal structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E s~.,,-0, „c~,~ ,7~ Protect No TPM15716 Comolehon Date Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential . structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access regwrements (Section "E" -Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire District X. Fire Access 1 Commercal Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map or the issuance of any grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire DisVict emergency access roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every sWcture on-site 2 Residential & Commercial Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional wew, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to Flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&Rs, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modificetions in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 3 The minimum width for a Fire District access road or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum inside tum radds is 20 feet The minimum outside tum radius is 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet The mimmum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of Vaffic lanes shall be 20 feet 4 All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior budding openings 5 All buildings that have three or more stones, or are 30 feet in height shall be provided with fire apparatus access on at least two sides Access to exterior walls shall extend from 5 to 50 feet horizontally, with no vertical obstructions 6 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bulding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information 7 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fire District access roadways/driveways 8 Gated or restricted access requires the installation of a Knox rapid entry system Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch Additionally for vehicle access gates, an approved, compatible traffic signal preemption device will be regwred to open the gate The gate shall remain in the open position until reset by Fire District key switch Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering mformabon 9 The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems This condition applies when the Fire District determines that such gates or other means of restricting access or delaying response exists 10 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles . 11 A bulding drectory shall be required, as noted below a Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site b Standard directory in bulding lobby SC-11-01 12 ~j''// -/-/ / I / / / / / I / / / / / / / / / / -/-/- Proied No TPM15716 Comole6on Date 12 A note shall be placed on all plans which Dearly indicates the following Emergency access, a ~ _/_/ minimum 26 feet in vndth and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and Gear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance vnth Fire Disthct • Standards Y. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit for combustible construction, the _/_/_ bwlder shall submit a letter to the Fire Distnd on company letterhead stating that water for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site Z. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse pennit, or the issuance of a bwlding pennd, _/ /_ whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Disthct Call the Fve ConsWction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal AA. Fees 1 Fire Disthd fee(s), plus a $1.00 microfilm fee per "plan page" vinll be due to the Rancho _/_/_ Cucamonga Fire District as follows " a $132 Minor Development Review Fee (MDR) (RemodeUTenant Improvement) b $132 Conditional Use Pennrt Fee (CUP) c $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection d $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply e $677 (per new bwlding) for Multi-family Residential Development f $677 (per new building) for New Commercial and Industrial Development "Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), andlor any consultant reviews well be assessed upon separate submittals of plans BB. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be requred for any activity or operation not speafically _/_/_ described below, which in the tudgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life or property b Operate a place of public assembly _/_/_ c High piled wmbustible storage -/ ~- d Candles and open flame in public assembly _/_/_ e Other• Installation of anv access control svstems/devices upon or within the required _/_/_ fire district access roadway CC. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved poor to construction in accordance with 1997/98 _/_/_~ Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards SC-11-01 13 ~/ ~i ~ /~ Protect No TPM15716 Comolehon Date NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant Improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a California Registered Professional Civil Engineer DD. Other Requirements/Comments 1 NOTE Pnor to Planning Division approval the applicant must address all, and resolve all Fire Distnct comments and/or conditions i sc-„-o, -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 3 Planrnng Division 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relmgwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) This Tentative Parcel Map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within three years from the date of the approval 3) All Conditions of Approval contained in Development Agreement 01-02 shall apply 4) The approval of Tentative Parcel Map 15716 shall be contingent upon, and shall not be effective until, the Ordinance approving Development Agreement 01-02 is effective 5) The future building to be located on Parcel 68 shall comply with the bwlding, parking, and average landscape setbacks per the Development Code 6) All environmental mitigation measures per the approved Mitigation Monitonng Program, shall apply 7) All intenor streets, dnve aisles, and pedestnan pathways shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Amencans with Disabilities Act to the satisfaction of the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Budding Offiaal Engineenng Division THE ENGINEERING SPECIAL CONDITIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ENGINEERING STANDARD CONDITIONS 1) Foothill Boulevard at I-15 Freeway on/off ramps a) Provide a southbound off-ramp free nght-turn only lane with a "pork-chop" channelization island b) Construct a free nght-turn lane for eastbound Foothill Boulevard to southbound I-15 Freeway c) Modify traffic signal, as regwred G, y r isQ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 4 2) Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard a) Provide a westbound free nght-tum lane b) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet m length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide two eastbound left-turn lanes 420 feet in length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide a southbound free nght-tum lane 200 feet in length v~nth a 120-foot taper e) Provide northbound and southbound bus bays on Day Creek Boulevard f) Provide eastbound and westbound bus bays on Foothill Boulevard g) Provide three southbound left-tum lanes, one southbound through, and one southbound free right-tum lane h) Provide an 8-foot wide median to serve as a pedestnan refuge on the north leg of this intersection I~_ subtect to City Engineer approval 3) Foothill Boulevard between I-15 Freeway and Day Creek Boulevard a) To be improved to the City's and Caltrans "Mator Divided Highway" standards (Typical mid-block section curb-to-curb = 20 x 12 x 12 x 14 x 14 x 14 x 12 x 12 x 20 feet, except at intersections) b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as required c) Provided raised landscaped medians d) Median openings will not be allowed between Day Creek Boulevard and I-15 Freeway e) Provide 16,000 lumen HPSV streetlights, as regwred f) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as required g) Provide signing and stnpmg, as regwred G Ham- isi PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 5 h) Foothill Boulevard, west of Day Creek Boulevard, shall be constructed full width and transitioned to tom existing subtect to City Engineer Approval 4) Day Creek Blvd at Victona Gardens Lane a) Provide a northbound free nght-tum lane b) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 200 feet in length with a 90-foot taper c) Prowde a southbound left-tum lane 300 feet in length with a 90-foot taper d) Provide two westbound left-tum lanes X320 feet in length v~nth a 120-foot taper, one left and through shared lane, and a separate nght-tum lane The taper for the westbound nght-tum only lane shall begin at the ECR of Pnvate Dnve "A " e) Provide a traffic signal 5) Day Creek Boulevard at Church Street a) Provide a northbound left-tum lane, three through lanes, and one separate nght-tum lane b) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 350 feet in length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide a northbound nght-tum lane 200 feet m length with a 60-foot taper d) Coordinate with the Amencan Beauty protect so that striping will line up across this intersection e) Provide a traffic signal 6) Day Creek Boulevard at Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) a) Provide two southbound left-tum lanes 375 feet in length with a 120-foot taper b) Provide a northbound left-tum pocket 250 feet in length with a 90-foot taper c) Provide for northbound and southbound bus bays d) Provide a traffic signal G; fi L- /s ~-. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 6 7) Day Creek Boulevard at Pnvate Dnve "V" (South Mam) a) Provide a southbound left-turn pocket 350-275 feet in length with a 120-foot taper b) No northbound left turns or eastbound left turns will be permitted c) No eastbound or westbound through traffic will be permitted d) Provide a traffic signal 8) Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street a) To be improved to the City's "Mator Divided Artenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb =curb 16 x 11 x 13 x 14 x 13 x 11 x 16 feet, except at intersections) b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) Provide raised landscaped medians Median openings v~nll only be allowed at signalized intersections d) Provide bike lanes on Day Creek Boulevard e) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential, 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) f) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as required g) Provide signing and stnping, as regwred 9) Church Street at Victoria Gardens Lane a) Provide an eastbound left-turn lane 200 feet m length with a 90-foot taper b) Provide a separate eastbound nght-turn only lane 200 feet in length with a 60-foot taper c) Provide two westbound left-turn lanes 250 feet in length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide one northbound left-turn lane, one through lane and separate nght-turn lane e) Provide a northbound left-turn lane 350-300 feet m length with a 120-foot taper f) Provide a traffic signal with northbound nght-turn overlap phasing G; ~-, L /S3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 8 9) 13) Victona Garden Lane at Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Main) a) Provide a northbound left-tum lane 300 feet rn length with a 120-foot taper b) Provide a southbound left-tum lane 200 feet rn length with a 120-foot taper c) Provide a continuous raised median island 4 feet in width from Pnvate Dnve "L" (North Marn) to 300 feet south of Private Dnve "L" (North Mam) The curb-to-curb width of the street shall be 68 feet d) Provide a traffic signal 14) Vrctona Gardens Lane at Pnvate Dnve "11" a) Provide an eastbound left-tum lane 300 feet rn length with a 120-foot taper b) Provide a traffic signal 15) Victona Gardens Lane at Private Dnve "JJ" a) Provide an eastbound left-tum lane 260 feet rn length with a 90-foot taper b) Provide a westbound left-tum lane 200 feet rn length with a 90-foot taper c) Provide a raised median island 340 feet rn length east of Pnvate Dnve "JJ " d) Provide a traffic signal 16) Vrctona Gardens Lane between Church Street and Day Creek Boulevard a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Ma~orArtenal" standards (Typical mid-block section curb to curb = 64 feet (16 x 11 x 10 x 11 x 16 feet), or 68 feet where a raised median island is regwred b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) G ~-, L /SS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 9 d) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) e) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as regwred f) Provide signing and stnpmg, as regwred g) Provide for bike lanes 17) Lot "B" (Arbor Lane) at Church Street a) Provide eastbound and westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet m length with a 90-foot taper b) The north/south through lanes must align and be coordinate with the Amencan Beauty Protect c) Provide two northbound left-tum lanes-290- 100 feet m length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide for bike lanes e) The first 50 feet of lane lines and curb south of Church Street shall be parallel to the centerline. f) Use a 20:1 taper for lanes and curb on Arbor Way from Church Street to Lot 'D' beyond the first 50 feet. 18) Foothtll Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Lot MM, Lot KK, Lot D from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot B), Lot B and Victona Gardens Lane shall be public streets All other mtemal lettered lots shall be considered to be pnvate dnve aisles 19) Lot D from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot B) and Lot B shall be maintained by the Developer through a maintenance agreement approved by the City Engineer 20) The developer shall make a fair share contnbution for mitigation of Traffic impacts outside the tunsdiction of the City in the follovnng amounts pnor to recordation of map a) Etiwanda Avenue at Slover Avenue - $10,700 b) Cherry Avenue at Base Line Road - $29,400 c) Cherry Avenue at Foothill Boulevard - $52,500 d) ~-- G; ~ T is~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 10 e) , $149,~'~ 9) $1~;415- h) , i) Foothill Boulevard at-€ast- Etiwanda Avenue - $67,720 ~- ~) Etiwanda Avenue at San Bemardmo Avenue - $10,344 k) ~ ~ 21) Traffic signals within the vianity of this protect shall be interconnected Interconnect shall be provided to future signals 22) Provide an on-street master controller and telephone drop 23) Provide traffic signal coordination timing for the morning, noon, and night peak penods using the Synchro and Sim traffic software program Traffic model data shall be provided to the City on 3 5 diskettes 24) The City "Dnveway Policy" shall be in ~- accordance with the approved Master Plan on vctona Gardens Lane 25) Bus bays shall be provided at the following locations northbound and southbound on Day Creek Boulevard at Foothill Boulevard, Church c Street, o ... n.. ,~ n ~~e i e..e. i ,.. ,~, „ ..a o..,.,.e n.,.,e n~~ie i e...,. L~~ and North Main Street. 26) Bus Bays shall be provided eastbound and westbound on Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard 27) A Fire Department access circular plan shall be approved by ~~ the Fire Department. 28) All crosswalks at intersections need to be setback at least 1-foot from traveled way This is to prevent pedestnans from being hit by parallel through traffic / 29) Reciprocal access for ingress and egress is regwred-due-te~he prepeREes- for all parcels not having access to a public street G'yT /S 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 11 30) Internal private drive aisles a) Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveways, as regwred b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Provide sigrnng and striping, as required d) Driveways into parking lots shall be a mirnmum of 100 feet from intersections e) Only one mid-block pedestrian crossing will be permitted between street intersections 31) The street trees and walkway concepts along the publiGpnvate streets shall be approved as determined by the City Engineer 32) The developer shall install landscaping to Caltrans standard on the west side of the I-15 Freeway from westerly of the southbound I~ off-ramp at Foothill Boulevard to Etiwanda Avenue, which will be maintained by Caltrans In the event that Caltrans does not accept the landscaping for maintenance, the developer shall provide for maintenance fora 20-year period as approved by the City Engineer 33) Staff attempted to address all streets and intersections If any were overlooked, then those missed shall be designed with the general intent of the other locations around the mall 34) The CFD is constructing a large portion of the off-site facilities Any off-site regwrement not constructed with the CFD is subtect to developer-to-developer reimbursement Submit for reimbursement agreement within six months of acceptance by City or all rights to reimbursements are void 35) Special medians, such as Foothill Boulevard medianer-Lane, ~nnll regwre electrical power to facilitate community programming slated for the median/street 36) LMD areas shall have a maximum of 3 1 slopes with maximum retaining wall of 30 inches, except the east side of Day Creek Boulevard shall have maximum slope of 4 1 Top of slope and toe of slope shall have a minimum 1-foot flat area to pedestrian walkways, 2-foot flat area at top of slope for larger slopes, per City standard G N,Z /~ 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 01-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 12 37) Parkways shall be 2 percent from the top of the curb to the back of the walk 38) All utilities off-site and on-site shall be handled according to the underground utility policy Utilities on the opposite sides of the streets fronting the protect shall have fees paid in accordance with the policy Utilities on the protect side of the street fronting the protect shall be undergrounded in accordance with the policy 39) 40) ALL FIRE PREVENTION SPECIAL CONDITIONS WERE DELETED AND REVISED FIRE PREVENTION STANDARD CONDITIONS G; /~, s / s9 Project No TPM15716 Completion Date Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 4 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation _/_/_ and prior to issuance of butldmg permits 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 6 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/_ counter) L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City _/_/_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _I_I perform such work 3 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building _I_/_ permits 4 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction pro/ects and for _/_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fll The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured _/_/_ from street centerline) Varies total feet on Foothill Boulevard _/_/_ Varies total feet on Church Street _/_/ Varies total feet on Dav Creek Boulevard _/_/_ r es_ t fee n Victoria Gardens Lane _/_/_ Varies total feet on Arbor Lane _/ / 65 total feet on Lot D _ _ _/ / 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 4 Recprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or _/_/_ by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint _/_/_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map SC-11-01 7 G', H, Z / 7~ Protect No TPM'16716 Comolehon Date 6 Private drainage easements for cross-lot dralnage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 7 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map 8 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Clty 9 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adtacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided 10 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Master Plan Storm Drain and off-site right-of-way N. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X c X X X Church Street X X X X X X X Day Creek Boulevard X X X X X X X X Victoria Gardens Lane X X X X X X X Arbor Lane X X X X X X Lot D X X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first / / / I -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / SC-11-01 S G, H, s / 73 Prgect No TPM15716 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-11-01 11 ""' ~~'~• FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT " FIRE SAFETY DIVISION ~~~ STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0507-B PROJECT #: TPM 15716 PROJECT NAME: Victoria Garden Regional Center DATE: January 17 2002 PLAN TYPE: Commensal/Industrial APPLICANT NAME: Forest Clty OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group M B A (Mixed uses) FLOOR AREA (S): TYPE CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: North of Foothill between Day Creek and I-15 FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locate Fire Protection Plamm~g Specialist PLANNER: Brent Le Count ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following comments and conditions represent the mmimum standard for Fire District approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based upon review of the plans submitted Although we have tried, not all Fire District requrements for the proposed protect may be included Additions to or changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire Distract requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Division to obtain Fire District approval If your protect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verifv compliance A. Community Facddies Distracts 1 Required Note The protect is located within a "Mello-Roos" Community Faalities District for fire protection services B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Pnor to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water Distract 2 Prior to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, Flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 3 Required Note: When any portion of a facility or bulding is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not Ime of sight 4 Regwred Note: The requred fire flow for this project shall be 4000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes one fire hydrant is regwred per 1000 gallons of regwred fire flow 5 Regwred Note The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 6 Public fire hydrants located with a 500-foot radius of the proposed may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 7 If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the bwldmg permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reaprocal maintenance agreement, that shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 8 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker ind~ceting the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of ReFlectrve Hydrant Markers" On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. WaterAvadabihty Regwred Note. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avadabrlrty for Fire Protecbon Form shall be completed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow D. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Required Note Conditions set by the Fire District during the Environmental Impact Review to mitigate the impact on public fire protection services require that ALL structures and buildings regwre the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system E. Fire Access 1 Required Note: Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a budding constructed when any portion of the faality or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150-feet from an approved fire district vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building 2 Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes 3 Commeraal/Industrial and Multi-family Residential-Required Note Prior the issuance of any grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans and specification for the approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site 4 Roadways and Fve Lanes-Required Note Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets, courts and cul-de-sacs from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise regwred Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming dewces (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire Distract, Fire Safety Division 5 Pnvate Roadways and Fire Lanes-Required Note The inside tum radus shall be 20 feet The outside turn radius shall be not less than 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 6 Dead-end Fve Distract Access Roadways-Required Note Dead-end Fire District access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus This may include a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District 7 Required Note All portions of the faality or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the extenor of the bulding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are an obstruction 8 Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior budding openings 9 Required Note All buildings that have three or more stones, or are 30 feet in height shall be provided with fire apparatus access on at least two sides Access to extenor walls shall extend from 5 to 50 feet honzontally, with no vertical obstructions 10 Knox Rapid Entry System A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for speafic details and ordering information 11 Required Note• Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 12 A building or site directory shall be regwred, as noted below Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site Standard directory in building lobby Other 13 Required Note Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, m accordance with Fire District Standards 14 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on regwred Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width When Fire Lanes are required by the Fire Distract the plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawrng of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire DisV~ct standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 15 New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 16 In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, swtes, or buldings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan rn coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga F. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note: Pnor to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply ~H,2 / ~ 9 for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times. G. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for any requred notes to be placed on the plans pnor to submittal H. Fie District Service Fees' 1 The following fees may be applicable to this protect and are being identified at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs. Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subtect to approval by the Fire Distract. The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division " $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial or multi-family dwelling units (Paid pnor to TRC) $66 Fire District Access Review (Includes Fire Lane Plans) $132 Minor Development Review Fee (MDR) (Remodel/Tenant Improvement) $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new bwlding) for New Commeraal and Industrial Development " Plus a microfiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division ' Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 2 The following service fees are due to the Fire District and payable at this time: $82 Start-up fee for commercal, industrial or multi-family dwelling units (Paid pnor to TRC) $132 Fire District Review of Tract or Parcel Maps other than Single-family Residential Tract $214 -Total due at this time. Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District " " Plus a microfiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Diwsion `Note• Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant revews upon submittal of plans 1. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) a General Use Permit shall be regwred for any actmty or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property b Operate a place of public assembly To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the requred fire district access roadway This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that d/e~lays or slows Fre District response L? ~ Z l80 d High piled combustible storage e Candles and open flame in public assembly .1. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Budding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans K. Other Fire District Regwrements or Comments 1 NOTE Compliance with Fire District mitigation measures identified in Environmental Impact Report Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 10/24/01 Revision ~~, ~" ~~/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 3 the Foothill Boulevard out parcels bound by future Victona Gardens Lane to the north, future Day Creek Boulevard to the west, the I-15 Freeway to the east, and Foothill Boulevard to the south, and the roughly 18 acres of future residential development along the north edge of the project between future Church Street and "D" Street shall comply with applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Victona community Plan, except where specifically detailed in the /~ Master Plan. 3) The allowed list of land uses for Day Creek Boulevard shall not mGude fast food dnve-thru restaurants north of Victona Gardens Lane Other fonns of dnve-thru uses may be permitted subtect to Development Review/Conditional Use Permit Dnve-thru uses that include fast food restaurants, as defined by Development Code Section 17 30 030 (w), may be permitted on Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Victona Gardens Lane with the exception of the comer parcel at Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard (Parcel 53 on Tentative Parcel Map), on which no dnve-thru uses may be permitted All dnve-thru development on Day Creek Boulevard shall be very well screened and designed to be consistent with the urban atmosphere of the Regional Center 4) Unless otherwise specified in the Master Plan text, all dimensions shown on conceptual plans and schematics within the Master Plan are shown to convey design concepts only and are subtect to change with Phase 1 Design Review 5) The revised design for the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard shall be per the Day Creek Master Plan Any revised design shall be subtect to Design Review Committee review The revised design may have reduced land area devoted to intersection enhancement, but the overall level of quality must be on par with the current design per the Day Creek Boulevard and Victona Arbors Master Plans Whatever design is established for the northeast comer shall apply to the other three comers as well 6) No compact parking spaces shall be allowed 7) The frontage of the site on Church Street at the northeast comer area of the site shall be designed as sensitively as possible relative to single-family homes planned to the north The Terra Vista Town Center frontage along Church Street provides an excellent example to this type of sensitive buffer design 8) The bwlding on Parcel 68 shall comply with the building, parking and average landscape setbacks relative to Church Street per the Development Code G, ~, s /~ Y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 9 d) Provde a traffic signal 16) Victona Gardens Lane between Church Street and Day Creek Boulevard a) To be improved to the City's "Modified Mator Artenal" standards (typical mid-block section curb to curb = 64 feet (16 x 11 x 10 x 11 x 16 feet), or 68 feet where a raised median island is regwred b) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk, as regwred c) Provide streetlights, as regwred (residential 9500 and commercial 16,000 lumen HPSV) d) Provides R26(s) "No Stopping Any Time" signs, as regwred e) Provide signing and stnping, as regwred f) Provide for bike lanes 17) Lot "B" (Arbor Lane) at Church Street a) Provide eastbound and westbound left-turn lanes 200 feet in length with a 90-foot taper b) The north/south through lanes must align and be coordinate with the Amencan Beauty Protect c) Provide two northbound left-tum lanes 100 feet m length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide for bike lanes e) The first 50 feet of lane Imes and curb south of Church Street shall be parallel to the centerline f) Use a 20 1 taper for lanes and curb on Arbor Way from Church Street to Lot "D" beyond the first 50 feet g) Alternate improvement standards to those listed above, (16a through 16f), may be considered subject to satisfaction of the City Engineer. 18) Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Lot "MM", Lot "KK", Lot "D"from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot "B"), Lot "B" and Victona Gardens Lane shall be public streets All other internal lettered lots shall be considered to be pnvate dnve aisles "\ 6, N, r ~~ i l2c >, ~.) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 10 19) Lot "D" from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane ("B")and Lot "B"shall be maintained by the Developer through a maintenance agreement approved by the City Engineer 20) The developer shall make a fair share contnbution for mitigation of Traffic impacts outside the tunsdiction of the City in the following amounts pnor to recordation of map a) Etiwanda Avenue at Slover Avenue - $10,700 b) Cherry Avenue at Base Lme Road - $29,400 c) Cherry Avenue at Foothill Boulevard - $52,500 d) Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue - $67,720 e) Etiwanda Avenue at San Bernardino Avenue - $10,344 21) Traffic signals within the vicinity of this protect shall be interconnected Interconnect shall be provided to future signals 22) Provide an on-street master controller and telephone drop 23) Provide traffic signal coordination timing for the mommg-nserr and ~ ~' night peak penods using the Synchro and Sim traffic software program Traffic model data shall be provided to the City on 3 5 diskettes 24) The City "Dnveway Policy" shall be in accordance with the approved Master Plan on Victona Gardens Lane 25) Bus bays shall be provided at the following locations northbound and southbound on Day Creek Boulevard at Foothill Boulevard, Church Street, and North Main Street 26) Bus Bays shall be provided eastbound and westbound on Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard 27) A Fire Department access arcular plan shall be approved by the Fire Department 28) All crosswalks at intersections need to be setback at least 1-foot from traveled way This is to prevent pedestnans from being hit by parallel through traffic 29) Reciprocal access for ingress and egress is regwred for all parcels not having access to a public street 30) Internal pnvate dnve aisles a) Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and dnveways, as regwred PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-20 DA01-02 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 11 ~- s~b) Provide signing and stnping, as required djc) Dnveways into parking lots shall be a minimum of 100 feet from intersections e)d) Only one mid-block pedestnan crossing will be permitted between ~ street intersections I~_ 32j31) The developer shall install landscaping to Caltrans standard on the west side of the I-15 Freeway from westerly of the southbound off- ramp at Foothill Boulevard to Etiwanda Avenue, which will be maintained by Caltrans In the event that Caltrans does not accept the landscaping for maintenance, the developer shall provide for maintenance fora 20-year penod as approved by the City Engineer 33)32) Staff attempted to address all streets and intersections If any were overlooked, then those missed shall be designed with the general intent of the other locations around the mall 34)33) The CFD is constructing a large portion of the off-site facilities Any off-site requirement not constructed with the CFD is subtect to developer-to-developer reimbursement Submit for reimbursement agreement within six months of acceptance by City or all nghts to reimbursements are void 35)34) Special medians, such as Foothill Boulevard median, will require electncal power to facilitate community programming slated for the median/street 36)35) LMD areas shall have a maximum of 3 1 slopes with maximum retaining wall of 30 inches, except the east side of Day Creek Boulevard shall have maximum slope of 4 1 Top of slope and toe of slope shall have a minimum 1-foot flat area to pedestnan walkways, 2-foot flat area at top of slope for larger slopes, per City standard 37-)36) Parkways shall be 2 percent from the top of the curb to the back of the walk 36)37) All utilities off-site and on-site shall be handled according to the underground utility policy Utilities on the opposite sides of the streets fronting the protect shall have fees paid in accordance wiih the policy Utilities on the protect side of the street fronting the protect shall be undergrounded in accordance with the policy The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 9 f) Provide for bike lanes 17) Lot "B" (Arbor Lane) at Church Street a) Provide eastbound and westbound left-tum lanes 200 feet in length with a 90-foot taper b) The north/south through lanes must align and be coordinate with the Amencan Beauty Protect c) Provide two northbound left-tum lanes 100 feet in length with a 120-foot taper d) Provide for bike lanes e) The first 50 feet of lane lines and curb south of Church Street shall be parallel to the centerline f) Use a 20 1 taper for lanes and curb on Arbor Way from Church Street to Lot'D' beyond the first 50 feet g) Alternate improvement standards to those listed above, (16a through 16f), may be considered subjectto satisfaction of the City Engineer. 18) Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Lot MM, Lot KK, Lot D from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot B), Lot B and Victoria Gardens Lane shall be public streets All other internal lettered lots shall be considered to be private dnve aisles 19) Lot D from Day Creek Boulevard to Arbor Lane (Lot B) and Lot B shall be maintained by the Developer through a maintenance agreement approved by the City Engineer 20) The developer shall make a fair share contnbution for mitigation of Traffic impacts outside the ~unsdiction of the City in the following amounts prior to recordation of map a) Etiwanda Avenue at Slover Avenue - $10,700 b) Cherry Avenue at Base Line Road - $29,400 c) Cherry Avenue at Foothill Boulevard - $52,500 d) Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue - $67,720 e) Etnrvanda Avenue at San Bernardino Avenue - $10,344 21) Traffic signals within the vicinity of this protect shall be interconnected Interconnect shall be provided to future signals U~ ~~ Z /..S~v CREV. -Z-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-22 TPM15716 -FOREST CITY DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA, INC January 23, 2002 Page 10 22) Provide an on-street master controller and telephone drop 23) Provide traffic signal coordination timing for the rooming-nee+a; and ~ ~- nightpeak penodsusing the Synchro and Sim traffic software program Traffic model data shall be provided to the Gty on 3 5 diskettes 24) The City "Driveway Policy" shall be in accordance with the approved Master Plan on Victoria Gardens Lane 25) Bus bays shall be provided at the following locations northbound and southbound on Day Creek Boulevard at Foothill Boulevard, Church Street, and North Main Street 26) Bus Bays shall be provided eastbound and westbound on Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard 27) A Fire Department access circular plan shall be approved by the Fire Department 28) All crosswalks at intersections need to be setback at least 1-foot from traveled way This is to prevent pedestrians from being hit by parallel through traffic 29) Reciprocal access for ingress and egress is regwred for all parcels not having access to a public street 30) Internal private drive aisles a) Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and driveways, as regwred ~' s)b) Provide signing and striping, as regwred ~c) Driveways into parking lots shall be a minimum of 100 feet from intersections e)d) Only one mid-block pedestrian crossing will be permitted between street intersections IC 3231) The developer shall install landscaping to Caltrans standard on the west side of the I-15 Freeway from westerly of the southbound off- ramp at Foothill Boulevard to Etiwanda Avenue, which will be maintained by Caltrans In the event that Caltrans does not accept the landscaping for maintenance, the developer shall provide for maintenance fora 20-year period as approved by the City Engineer ~j ~/r ~s 7/Sg ~~EY. 2) Jan-23-02 03.OOpm From-Forect City Dev LA 110 gnpltenentamn A Ptum 4r- S 5- 5.1 1213dBAA30A i-3I0 P 002/OOd F-7A5 MAS PsN'I p ~z~t lsloNs f~23 2 Fig s.!- A mrdy sAetdi of dre rerceneeoon e/ town WaOr arai $ounr FpenSVeer IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS THE PLANNING, REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS The planning review and approval process for the implemenranon of the Rancho Cuorrtonga Regional Cente4 Victona Gudens, is summaraed as followr. 5-la Master plea uid Pluming Docamenu -Review & Approval The Mawr plan for V-iaoria Gazdens was aubmltoed to the Gry of Ranedzo Cucamonga and the plan was eeviewad and approved by City Committees, the Planning Commission, and the City Counul. The Master Plan is acwmpanted by three doerrmenm An amendment to the vcwrsa Commumry plan (VCPA), and An Envrronmenral Impact Report (EIR) The Master Plan includes Dcsegn Guidelines, eonexming issues of bwlding deagn and signagq and Development Standards. conctming issues of land use and zoning. The approval of the Master plan for Yutoria Gardens by the Ciry includes: 1. The amotma of developmcnc in gross floor azea, by land use and by Area of M a s t s r P l a ~ • Vltso na Gardens 0.edionar Center Rsntho Ctecam ond+ G/ y ?- ' Jan-23-02 03.OOpn From-Forect Lity Dev LA 1213d3B030B T-310 P 003/OD4 F-785 ch 5 lmplemenooon & Process 111 Vuzorta Gardrns, 2. The amounss of required parking, by land use and by Ara. 3 The overall plan for strnett and open spaces, 4 The -and uses proposed, and 5. The standards and gutdelmes for devdopmrnt of buddrngs, srgrtage conccpss and types, and landsnpc architecture ueannmu di Sor'e'hvno>` Ic is the intent of the City and else pppbcanc that approval the Master Plan and ucompanying doo[menss will cs[abhzb a rnm live sec of land use regrdanons and rnnstimre'lsealdixxHa~aPProval P1Ol~ development conforming m the Master Plan, sub)ect only m furrhe da[gn review ("Dwgn Review') of building and signaga Dnrgn Review shall include review of eacamr devanons of the buildings, tenant signage, building arch[recrural aesdredcs, antnor matauls and colors' Design Review shall not operate to tesurct the uses, floor areas or [nrernal vehicular and podestrran Circulation systems otherwise permitted under the Maser Plan, or require landsaping bryond chat idtaci6ed rn chc Master Plan- S.Ib Phax One of the Reyjwnal Cents - Revrcw aad Approval Following revew and approval of the Mesta Plan and accompanying documents. the design for Phase I of the Vicwtia Gardens proleca wall be submitted ro the Crry for Design Review. "Ihe design will be reviewed ,~.mipssrerielly for conformance with the Development Standards and for adherence to the dcngn direedons tsmbltshcd by the Design Guidelines. Inrtnl Design Review fot Phan 1 will be by the Planning Commtssron awd~~ cCostaeil Shouhl there be tevtsaoas to the deign ofPhase I. subsegttenc to die initial Design Review approvals, then subsequent Design Review ofthe revision would occur rn two wa s. If the than e derummaaon of rrecto tannin tgn rcv[evr and aPPfQ°°) `s'O1dd were si t, then a Design be by the Director of Planning. If a changes gtufian Review Committtx would perform Design Rcvievx a d bees of the Pl __ S.le Subsegomc Projecu arid Phases -Review and Approval Folbwrng Phase I D6ign Rrntw approval, Phan II, subsequent phases and pro)eca will be submitted ro [he Gry for Design Renew from nme ro [jme consistent wtdt the appbont's developmen[ sclmdule. Design Review well be conducted by the Director of Planning. The design will be tevicsvcd For conformance wish the Development Smrrdards and for adherrn« [o the design drrecdons established by else Dcngn Guidelines. Projects submraed in Phase II and srrbsequen[ phurs will most Iilcdy not be u Urge as Phase I. The pro)eess well vary in sve. The smallest project mold be an individual buiWsng and the largest rnuld be a dtvdopmmt consismg of mdnple bsrildsngs on more than one block of Yawna Gatdcss. Pl~++^ ~' ~~arrc>~. vier orla Gardent 0.egio nal Center, 0.aneho Cucamonga M a s t e r P t a n Fig 5.2 A studl'sArah at Town Cmn and the grarM steps rdddng rt ro North MalnSoeer - Jan-23-02 03.Olpm From-forect City Dev LA 1 12 Impkmnunlon !. Prorms sh, S 12134888308 T-310 P 004/004 P-T85 M+>,er (Kas'~ fly' plate Ar~enAn•.cn-YS $.ld The Dirttor of Planning may approve duough the Design Review process minor changcs from the regmrements of the Master Plan widiouc a formal Masru Plan amendment. d5 ex Qedll"i~t~y 0.5 QO SSi~Ip ll 0. fer $.le Timmg and Appeals The Ciry shall process and render its decisso on rrch Design Review application pplicanc submittal of a slit plan, dcvatlOm atidcolor/materials samples, ifapplirable. Any Design Rcvtew decision may be apptakd by nc~ appltarit~ - - wn ng .-.-....~.~AC~-dsr,ce w,th Se~tbn 5.2 CITY PLANS AND 7HE MASTER PLAN l?' O 2 ' p$ 0 ~~ ~~~ rjevetep.,r-l! Code. In addtrion co the Master Plan. die accompanying planning documents char affect Victoria Cnrdens, the Regional Center of the Ciry oFRandso Cur~monga, include. 5.2c 'ILe Victoria Arbors Masmr Plats The Victoria Arbors Masco Plan is the plan for the commumry in which Victoria Gardens is bcired. The Plan bas provuwns which affect Victoria Gardens, part¢utuly for landscape arrliitamrc and public faabdes; hmPevcy the Plan does not need m be amended. 5.zd The Emltvn+.+~.rol Impact Report for Victoria Gudcas An accompanying document of the Master Plan a the Frnronmrnn) Impart Report (EIR) for theYutoria Gudens Regional Centct. The E1R analyrrs the potennal impaces ofthe devdopmenc and recommends micigacwn measures, if necessary and apphcabk. victoria Gardens Raglonal Center. Rancho Cucamonga M a s t e r P l e n 5.2b 'Phe Vicroria Commtutiry Plan Tlie Victoria Commtwry Plan is the: phn for the region. whidi includes the plan for Victoria Arbon and ocher aces iawhu the Plan ta1Ls °An Intercelaud Community of Vdlagds•" TI'e Viaotia Community Plan noels m be amended ro be consistent with the Maseex Plan for Victoria G,rdrns. Rasa Asrtaly skercA afdie Town Sgoare T H E C I T Y A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: January 23, 2002 TO~ Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FRONt Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner SUBJECT. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00778 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A request to construct a temporary modular recreation building of 360 square feet In the Mountain Vlew Apartments (Tract 12365) In the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the southwest corner of Spruce Avenue and Ten'a Terra Vista Parkway - APN 1077-651-07 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surroundlna Land Use and Terra Vista Community Plan Zoning North - Coyote Canyon Park/Park, and Park Vlew Place Apartments/Medwm-High Resldentlal South - Single Family Resldentlal/Medwm Resldentlal East - Coyote Canyon Park/Park, and vacant land/Elementary School (former elementary school site) West - Sycamore Terrace Apartments/Medwm Resldentlal B General Plan Desianations• Protect Slte - Medwm-High Resldentlal (14-24 dwelling units per acre) North - Medwm-High Resldentlal (14-24 dwelling units per acre)/Park South - Low-Medwm Resldentlal (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low-Medwm Resldentlal (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Medwm-High Resldentlal (14-24 dwelling units per acre) C Slte Characteristics Mountain Vlew Apartments was approved by the Planning Commisslon In 1986 and was subsequently completed, and has been occupied since that time The site contains 270 apartment units on approximately 15 acres of land The site continues to be owned and maintained by Lewis Apartment Communities S D Parking Calculations All parking within the protect is provided either under carports or open parking spaces, no garage spaces were required at the time the protect was built ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00778-LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES January 23, 2002 Page 2 TABLE 1 -1986 PARKING STANDARDS Number of Number of Type Number of Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Umts Ratio Reawred Provided 2-Bedroom Apt 203 1 6 325 325 spaces/umt 3-Bedroom Apt 67 1.7 114 114 spaces/umt Guest 270 0 25 67 67 spaces/umt TOTAL 270 506 506 The applicant has field venfied that the 506 parking spaces are actually available on the site at this time BACKGROUND: The Mountain View Apartments were approved and constructed in 1986 and have been occupied continuously since that time. Staff recently approved a Minor Development Review (DRC2001-00753) at the Mountain View Apartments, for the development of a secondary clubhouse Lewis Apartment Communities would like to expand the program offered to the residents of Mountain View Apartments, particularly in the area of children's programs and activities In order to do this they regwre additional space to conduct the program The Minor Development Review approved a 1,739 square foot structure that is consistent in design and matenals to the existing apartment community Upon review of the existing amenities approved and existing on the site, it is staffs opinion that adequate open space remains for resident use and that the provisions of the secondary clubhouse and children's programs will further enhance the recreational opportunities available to the residents. ANALYSIS' A. General The applicant has requested consideration of this Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in order to place a 360 square foot modular structure within four existing parking spaces, in order to begin the programs immediately while the permanent structure is under construction. This modular structure will temporanly consume four parking spaces in the area of the existing recreation center and pool. The applicant has indicated that the permanent structure will take approximately seven months to construct, therefore, staff has suggested that the CUP be approved for no more than one-year to minimize the length of time that available parking is sacnficed for this temporary structure B Environmental Assessment The project is categoncally exempt from CEQA review per CEQA Gwdelines Section 15301 T ~. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00778-LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES January 23, 2002 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Valley Datlv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planrnng Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00778 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DM\Is Attachments Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Minor Development Rewew Approval Letter Resolution of Approval LJ ~3 _ • '. ., - -~ - 1`' e. ; CF!"yY.' f:~" *+'`i G/ auC°r'=~~ 1 n {~I ` ` \ .~ ~i~~ \ ~ ~~ ~, _ ter'- ~. ~ _ 1• T" ... ~{~P. ...,. ~• (,y,+,-,.,~ ~;, Ogg V !t '~~`~ .~ {"~"~ {'_f,~.',r~"~,.t ~ 1 ,~. re . ,~ l ~ _y .~~~E E i '4~Y_ .J. 1 - ~~ ••~:~3 ~ ems'. ,u ,~jf~ ,_`y _. riT~ :. `F `~= i "L ~Ji'-rS ,.i i w-~ Y ya ^i ~,~ i ~-`~~`L• ,~ig~`c~ •~~~~:Y'~ , __ _ ~r x- x•,v •- +-- -rte I ~ ~. n Ti-~ a-.~/] {{~,,1 i Ey ; ~S 2 ~~ Cr C- 7R aE //,BlT~ °""4` LEWISAPARTMENT nucT ~ i Iit COMMUNITIES MOUNTAM VIEW ( Its s~ ¢> SITE PLAN O16N N^u^+~^n~ APARTMENTS ~ ij~~Is' ,~"F , H E C a~ Y O F R~NCKO CUCI~MONG1~ January 3, 2002 Chris Greiner Levies Apartment Communities 1156 North Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00753. Dear Mr. Greiner. The Development Review process for the Recreation Building at Mountain View Apartments (Tract 12365) has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation dunng this review process. Findin s 1. The proposed Recreation Building is consistent with the General Plan 2. The proposed Recreation Building is rn accordance with the objectives of the Terra Vista • Community Plan and the purpose of the district in wfiich the site rs located. 3. The proposed Recreation Building, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The proposed Recreation Building complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Development Code. In addition, the project includes the recreational amenities as required by the Development Code, inGuding three tot lots and gazebos, twu swimming pools/spas, and two open play areas. 5. The project is categoriplty exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Conditions This project rs approved subject to the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: The building colors, materials, and architectural details shall be consistent with the existing apartment bwidings. 2. The construction of the Recreation Building shall be accomplished in accordance with approved plans on file with the Planning Division. Mayor Wllllam J Alexander Councilmember Paul Blane • Mayor Pro-Tem Diane WIIliams ~ Councilmember Bob Dutton Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Counclimember Grace Curatalo 10500 CMc Center Drive • P. O Box 807 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 •(909) 477-2700 • FAX (909) 477-2849 ~'~y~g~--G/ www cLrancho-Cucamonga ca.us~~ , CHRIS GREINER MDRDRC2001-00753 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES January 3, 2002 Page 2 3. The fencing surrounding the outdoor play area shall be wrought iron. 4. A Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Di~nsion priorto issuance of the building pennit The Landscape Plan shall include trees, ground cover, and shrubs along the front of the budding elevation, along with the replacement of any plant material disturbed by the construction of the Recreation Budding. 5. The Recreation Bwlding proposed by this Minor Development Review shall be used only for programs and activities by residents of the Mountain View Apartments. Any other use of the proposed Recreation Building may require the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. This decasion shall be final following aten-day appeal penod beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing wrath the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $62 appeal fee. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Debra Meier at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DNISION B er City Planner BB:DM1ma Attachment Standard Conditions cc: Karen Mosley, Public Svc. Tech. I Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer ~,rl~/,~3~7- C 2 ~ `7 • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: MDRDRC2001-00753 SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: LEWISAPARTMENTSCOMMUNITIES LOCATION: MOUNTAIN VIEW APARTMENTS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A General Requirements B 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / / agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or ~n the altematNe, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The Cily may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Vananca, or Development/Design Rewew approval shall expire ff _/ /_ bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not wmmencad within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1. Pnor to any use of the project sde or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Unrform Building Code and _/ / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Pnor to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection Distract and the Budding and Safety Division • to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy ,~,r~ri~fr c ~ ~ ~ St:_„-0, • • Protect No MDRDRC2001-00753 Comole6on Date 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, /_/_ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 4 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/ / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, benning, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved to place shall be protected with a construction bamer in / I_ accordance wdh the Municipal Code Section 19.08 110, and so noted on the grading plans. The locetion of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and thmming methods. 3 Landscaping and imgaUon shall be designed to conserve water through the pnnc~ples of _/ / Xeriscepe as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (908) 477-2710, ~OR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: E. General Requirements 1. Submtt five complete sets of plans inducting the following: / !_ a. Sde/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Eledncal Plans (2 sets, detached) inducting the s¢e of the main switch, number and size of sernce entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometncs, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture unds, gas piping, and heating and air condttioning; and g. Planning Division Pro/ect Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) dearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report / /_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and 'lvet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and Cdy licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/ / the City pnor to permit issuance. 4 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the CerUficete of Occupancy issued by the _/ / Building anQd S,ayfet-y Drv~sion. SC-11-01 2 • • arDled No MDRDRC2001-00753 C~gmDle6on Date F. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ! /_ marked with the pro/ect file number (I a ,CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Unrform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Unrfornt Plumbrng Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other appliceble codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and appllceble handouts 2 Pnor to Issuance of building permits for a new wmmercial or Industrial development or addition _/ / to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may inGude, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to fhe Building and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and / / pnor to Issuance of building penults. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. G. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Unrfonn Building Code for the property line clearances considering _/ /_ use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental _/ /~ Health Services pnor to issuance of bulldmg permds. 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table / / 5-A. 4 Extenor walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A I / / 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. _/ / H. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be In accordance with the California Building Code, Clty / / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Calrfomia to / / pertorm such work 3 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved pnor to issuance of building permits ! /_ 4. A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for _/ /_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. .~,ry~,~~T C~ ~ i c SC-11-01 3 ProjeG No APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477.2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WRH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. I _/ /_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lightng to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with I _/ /_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entrre development. 3. Lighting in extenor areas shall be in vandal-resistant factures. J. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3 All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with ekher iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. IG Windows 1. Ail sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or tredc in any manner. / / / / 2. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly In residences, due to the delay or ~ ~ prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. L. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and I / employees on the operebon of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in fain save dollars and lives. 2 Alarm companies shall be provided wAh the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number. (909)941-1488. ~ ~ ~ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Water Plans for FIre Protection / / 1. Fire flow requirements for this project shall be 1_` gallons per minute at a minimum residual _~ ~ pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance wdh Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended. The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended. 2. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan I _/ / submitted for review and approval. Indude mom size. N. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a sRe developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever / /_ occurs first, the applicent shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Distnd. Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architecturel Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal. SC-11-01 4 • • Project No MDRDRC2001-00753 Comoletlon Date O. Fire Suppression System 1 Pnor to the issuance of a building pennd, plans and specfiications for the fire suppression system for the protection of commercial-type cooking equipment shall be submitted to the Fire Distract for rewew and approval No work is allowed wdhout a Fire District penniL 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certficate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire District. P. Fees 1. Fire Distract fee(s), plus a $1.00 microfilm fee per "plan page' will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract as follows:" a. $132 Minor Development Review Fee (MDR) (RemodeVTenant Improvement) b $677 (per new building) for New Commercial and Industnal Development "Note: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire spnnklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans. Q. Plan Submittal Required Notice Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electncel and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards. NOTE: Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protecbon systems and/or any consutant revrews wlll be assessed at time of submittal of plans. NOTE: A separete grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for exisbng bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a CaliFomia Registered Professional Civil Engineer. • / / -- / / / / it 1 ~~r `/~~ C ~ ~ I~ SC-11-01 RESOLUTION NO 02-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00778 FOR THE USE OF A 360 SQUARE FOOT MODULAR RECREATION BUILDING ONATEMPORARY BASIS, LOCATED IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 1077-651-07 A. Recitals 1 Levws Apartment Communities filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No DRC2001-00778, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Conditional Use Permit request rs refen'ed to as "the application." 2 On the 23rd day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenn:d public hearing on January 23, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows: a The application applies to property referred to as the Mountain View Apartments, located at the southeast comer of Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, and b The Mountain View Apartments were constructed m 1986 m accordance vnth all standards and regwrements applicable at the time of approval, and c The property to the north and west of the subject site are also apartments, the property to the south consists of single-faintly residential, the property to the east is a park site and vacant land, and d The use of the temporary modular recreation bwldmg will occupy 4 of the 506 existing parking spaces on-site during the period for which the Conditional Use Permit is approved, and e The proposed temporary modular recreation bwldmg v~nll be used to provide chtldren's recreation activities for the residents of the Mountain View Apartments immediately while the permanent bwldmg is under-construction (DRC2001-00753) ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-23 CUP DRC2001-00778 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES January 23, 2002 Page 2 • 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the ob~ectnres of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vwll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the Gudelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Dwision 1) The temporary modular structure shall be removed upon completion of the permanent structure, or within one-year, whichever occurs first 2) The programming and use of the temporary modular structure shall be limited to the residents of the Mountain View Apartments 3) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Lary T McNiel, Chairman ~I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-23 CUP DRC2001-00778 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES January 23, 2002 Page 3 ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the follovnng vote-to-wit. AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS r~ LJ • ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2001-00778 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MODULAR RECREATION BUILDING APPLICANT: LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES LOCATION: SEC SPRUCE AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • A. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Community Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bulding Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Pnor to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, _/_/_ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: B. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/ / _ _ . a SitelPlot Plan, b Foundation Plan, ~ I SC-11-01 Project No DRC2001-00778 c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Dvision Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City poor to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Bwlding and Safety Division C. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Budding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electnc Code, Tdle 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Bwlding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Budding Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and pnor to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays D. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Bwlding Code for the property line clearances considenng use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Envvonmental Health Services prior to issuance of budding permits 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A ~ ~ ~7 Comole6on Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- /_/_ / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- s~.,,.~, Protect No DRC2001-00778 Comole6on Date E. Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance wdh the Uniform Bwlding Code, City / / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in _ _ _ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to / / perform such work _ _ _ 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/ time of application for grading plan check _ 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits _/_/_ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of _ combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Security Lighting 1 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 2 Lighting in exterior areas shall be to vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/~ G. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, _/_/_ or alarmed H. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_/_ from frame or track in any manner 2 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or _/_/_ prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire I. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and _/_/_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 _/_/_ ~~~ SC-11-01 3 C I T Y O F ~~ \_ J A N C U O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE January 23, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Kart A Coury, Assoaate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION - A request to construct a new 3,946 square foot service station with convernence market, drive-thru carwash and pump island on 1 39 acre of land in the Office Park Distract of the Terra Vista Communty Plan, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive - APN 1077-421-38 Related file Preliminary Review DRC2001-00247 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surroundmo Land Use and Zornng North - Office Park (Terra Vista Planned Community), Vacant South - Community Commercial (Terra Vista Planned Community), Existing Commercial East - Office Park (Terra Vista Planned Community), Vacant West - General Commercal, Deer Creek Village Plaza B General Plan Desionations Protect Site - Office Park North - Office South - Community Commercial East - Office West - General Commeraal C Site Characteristics The site is located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive The lot is 1 39 acre within a larger vacant block of 11 acres located between Church Street and Town Center Drive The site is rough graded and is 2 to 4 feet higher than the street elevation along Haven Avenue Some street trees will require relocation due to the development of a right-turn pocket along Haven Avenue These trees wdl be relocated mto the modified street landscape design plan along Haven ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION JANUARY 23, 2002 Page 2 Avenue Significant new landscaping will be provided on-site A Type II gateway exists at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Town Center Dnve, which is fully landscaped along Haven Avenue but has suffered from inadequate watenng and neglect North and east of the site is vacant, undeveloped land To the west, across Haven Avenue, is a developed commeraal shopping center (Deer Creek Village Plaza) South of the site, across Town Center Dnve, is a new Sav-On drug store (Exhibit "A") D ANALYSIS General• The protect will include a 3,946 square foot convenience store, a 1,152 square foot car wash, and a 5,346 square foot steel canopy with eight fueling dispensers (Exhibit "C") The site will be developed in one phase The faality will be a 24-hour operation and will offer beer and wine sales for off-premise consumption. The convenience store budding height is approximately 30 feet, and the carwash budding height is approximately 21 feet The architectural style is very similar to the new Sav-On and the Terra Vista Town Center, and includes a stucco finish with foam and stucco covered wood tnm treatment, a tower element, tube steel trellis elements, ornamental light fixtures, decorative wall tde insets, and a mission tde roof (Exhibit "E") E Design Review Committee The Design Revew Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect at their November 20, December 4, and December 18, 2001, meetings (Exhibit "I") The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval Grading and Technical Committees The Grading and Technical Review Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval G Environmental Assessment Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant and staff completed Part II, (Exhibit "G") the Environmental Checklist form (Exhibit "H") Staff determined that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust The proposed protect includes an automotive fueling station with eight self-service pumps The storage and dispensing of gasoline poses potential hazards, but gasoline will be stored underground in accordance with local, state, and federal regwrements All appropnate permits will be obtained pnor to construction and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office With mitigation, all potential impacts can be reduced to a level of less than significant If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site There are no residences within 300 feet ~,a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION . JANUARY 23, 2002 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00437 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, Bra r City Planner BB KC\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibd "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Resolution -Site Utilization Map/Master Plan - Master Plan -Site Plan - Grading Plan - Elevations -Floor Plan - Landscape Plan - Initial Study - Design Review Committee Minutes of Approval with Conditions for DRC2001-00437 K3 C~ SITE UTILIZATIOIN MAP/MASTER PLAN .,A.. ~~ s • • MASTER PLAN D.d A ~ D.d B II 1 I I 1 1 1 ~'^~I,Dr •( /PRO E I D.d C P.d D f64~A R I O T T S E o D.d E ~N ' ~~ P.d D ~~I I~~ COMC@1Y~L YA~I~I KEN NEC NAVFN AVE • iOVN CFMEI DL IANCNO CIIUMONW TERRA VISTA BUSINESS PARK no IOEa1...W01E,0 ~- MD •~ i p ~ e e......,. ~+~ N e ~ ..e ~ • ~ rs ..,• w..^ ~ 1 ®~.. ,,,. . '~ .d.. ....... ~,.. '"~" ~ ~ ~ ~ w.w.N.. _ v~> VNN VnnJ • __ ....~.. T9~ J±L wm m,n ..... R.cm Ivan n Z ® ,~ - ~ ~ ~ i Q ~ ® .d p ®a .v ^ ° I - - / o v 0 o a t 0 1 ~,N _ r 1 v v . I vvovv t 0 ^ I ~ v ow oov o~ovvvv ~ 4 ~ ~ oov ovv oo SATI e 1 e yd p o v vv T ~. v 1 ' '°' ' ~ ~^ e I v 1 * o ~Vd~8AT0v OO sOl PIT[ PLAN ~1hT~l NEL 14vEN AVE y' 074gypV O O v O PTOWN CENTER OR 4 r,w ~•~ w ~ O O 0 V V ' O O O O V O O v RANCHO CUCAYONCA~ CAUPoRNP •~ ^ v a v v v v v ~~~yP~..~~ NCINITY NAP IMAO v~~~v~ru~uwcuu H \/~v/1 i 1 _ ALL OFF-SITE UTILITIES RPPp ~PApI P •tPPP1AtPP A v ~ r • AND LANDSCAPE TO BE ~~.~~ ._ ~„ RELOGTE[I - ~ a A'5.~. e y rm <: 757 ~3~"C '' : .~.9.. -. ~~VCc'~' F. • V UE F°° : ~ _ ~ ~r~~~'~'3~ "' HAVEN A EN . ~~ LIV vs • • u r~ r,_~ 11 I1 J e E ;~ =~i ~l4,~$ i~ i~~~~'ol;os oomooo®®o®® !i ~iiE! ~° !'l~ ggg~f if! ~1 ~ ~=6 ~!! ~~ 6 ~~l~ 6,p o•or•orrlros~rlirr .+ i;li~iia~~lloii Z w I 'a i ~~b I, •y •MI ,~ U" J 6 p Z ~~U ,=r. ; ; a >~? ;s ~ ~ =u S e < ~ ° n u =~z iS $. ~ L~ e 0 ~!. p a Wm ~ a ~ ~° ~~ ~ ~~~ sa t W< a ~u ~ Npp g t p 0 JZw M1' t0~'N .,•~'T P • j uI ~aA~ C ~ --~ rr ;...~ ~ ~ a$~g~ ~ ~~ Qo~~~",~ r _ ~' ~ ~ r - b ~~ _~ ~ ~ ® hl s - i"~" 1 i i ', i e a • • e ~. ©'I - © ~o f =9 - - .q ~- -~ : . I-~ o i\ =~ w-~ _: `_ ~ s L ~~ ml~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ m~s ab. \ a / ~ ~ % / eE~ ~Ro-\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ / 1 ~ ®. evrR mlg a o-'~ ~ > 1 , 1 1 EAST ELEVATION , , L OO Blk ie~ io : /Z >/` v \ ~ . ~\ _ - i-0 a 1 l 'S I$ a~sm - - ~ ~ et'a -,sa/%~ a Mobil ` ® ®, K & "" ~ ~ - ~ a - ~ `" o d b o d '1 1 C t i~ ~ E%iER1UR ELEVA-ONS x E C N1VEN .vE LEGEND WEST ELEVATION O }OWH [[NiCR OR R.xcxo cuc.uoxo. auroRxu - NY 1 P[ 'R O xnu[[R[~%Y MW IEw 11 N OL %rY a/~a ~ -P O O O 1Y Wb 1w5x. \J 4 ` ° ~ ~ '"°m FEPe~D A4Arbe@dagg . Q Rxn"co°~m ixwe n"°.w no.. -'•c 1 rz .w r '~ w m,E . b. _ 0 urtaa a.ixm uxwAi'•.gai Q Y¢imx~marwi .~Ri rvuk~i ~p EREO EiEDLER h ASSOGAIES W 11 [Pw[ kR - k~ rt/.'.b.,» O ®~~Y~~^ rJ' xW..x.k~'~x.,~Rm.dN N a/~~.Y Rv~ 14 bKµ lvnWS FMm kx b Of x1IAJl (MUiPW lM 11418 O ~y ~y ~~a ~y '' W1 1 H wAp yy 1 O(y~Y~Y {Llp~ Ia M ~ _ ~ • •~ • '4 Oi Iwwn im[e un s¢ un AMW nw O RQ l9ID ~kCn pl-M[ Ol. _ sa o ~ !~ q ~'~ ~' '° T; n ,o 1 r - PI -'9n ~ i • ~ c ni'f;'.' ~ .~~t '' S ~ .' ~ . : l ' : Y ' , ' 2 , n's ^, ~ . n/ } '~ 'S I 0 ` I I ~SL' I I is '• ~l. i I ; ' Fy ~; i I ,; I i I .® ~ I I ~.W S ~ I "~ ~ ~II _ ~~ ~ ~ `J l?Q W } N K~ m z c o ~ i ~ _~ W ~ W ~y0 O ~305~+ W t~ •_ >< W C s v 0 i ~f ~{ u ~•+ eri~ .;,I~: Q Q p Z d Y :i e ~~ ~ ~ ~~ g~ ~~ ~ `~e €~ ~~ ~g ~P 0 0 0 0 0 5 ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ s1aYf ~ O g~Y lY ~" ~ &k dx ~Y ~ 6 5 W 00000 O v a x e a ~. a ~ z ~ ' F . ~ c i Y i i i 2''' a ~ $ ,,. ~ e ~ '`° ~ ~ c ` e psi Y ef €€ 66 ~ gg ~ ~o~ o~ ~ d~;~~ ' ! i l .f 2 ~ E E E E r z Ei o 2~ 27~! u ~ ~t4;-. vii ;7'. c~ri l~i~4'" - a . rr}t+Y ~: - ~ µ ~ ~ 7 f~IP~ 1 ; :- ` y A ;i' ~ i I i I! • ' ' j I C I I I I I I I l I I f;~1~~IQ a w• a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' k _ + a t r V 4 ~~ ~ d~ :~~ ';; ,;~ , .~ ~ ;(xi1~, y =.,, i1G~ t ~a ~ i yb: ~ } Ur) 'L .1 • / Z ~ Y /~i ~ ~ ~ ti ii ~ ~ ~ ~ ' S aH,' (~ . {. J p [p i ~ 1 1 111 1 I ~ ~ i ~~ ~~ ~z ~ e z~ Ly [~~ ,~ ~§e - I I ~ I I ~ H ~ ~ , a~ EgEg~~ g5g5 D 24 2~ ~'~ G (2 i?& ~~ ~~ Q ~ t ~S ~S Q¢ zw ~e ~4 ~~ "" c 7 IO J OG-~0 0000 a ~ • . x a a . o a . a J 1~ u `J r~ U 1>{a W? p __ 2 11 ~~~ b I o p i O W u • ~ F > ~ s 3L W ~~u W iu0 S O y0 V O ~O t u e a 9 ~ ~ I ~~ ~.'~ 9~ ~~ ~~ ~5 ~~ ~1 a ~,¢ ~ 3 000 0 'a J ~ W Q~ ; W 0- C~ .0- Y~ A~[~ - E F ii ~i~" a e ~I O~~ t cl L E , ~_ W ~ijEl9 Y u. L A~ 1~ }~~ 01-K 1-6 I Pm^ ^m~ I I I i I I I I I I I I I ~®^ Omb 1= I I g I~ I~~ g~= I~ a I X10 ~l~ I I I" I I~ I I~ I I -~ I II I I d ~ ~md ~ --- -~. 0 TIl ~g _ _ _ _ .~ o [, o - 0 0 0 ° II ~DglNwG~ II ~~[~~ IIII ~~»~~ II ~pe""`~ II ~ sb w-x- - I v II sJ~~o II ~/ I .e-[ s-o _ ___ II (p~~i~~ II ~ ~ Ili / ~ II ~i~ ~II b n I I / %qXC PIM6 LOCIOGJ I \ I I ~ J\MN[Oe\0 ,~I I /4V YLl[q l \ \ 1 =1 9-1 ~~ -0 s Oiaa O~ v ~ J I = ~ ~ - - I ~ Y `, ;' ~ I ~. ,~ I ~ '~___~ I YNq. e,N i ~ o"`A~ ~ ~ i ~ f i' o I _ - -- I i i ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~--- ~ _~ I I f-IT-TI T~T'T-l FLOOR CLAN -o I I ° b ^ ~ o - J o n-e J- ~ O TDWN CENT(R DR ° a RANCND CUCA40NLA ULIfORNIA -----Q J-O' J_e O 00 F~e6a tsnmFk.Fecogg ie-e a-e' L - - ie_G- - - J u_e- ~e- e ~ F~~RyF~.D~~..i[,IEDLFR ~ AOBOCIATG ®:~a~n~~ FLOOR PLAN e~ ,~. _ ~. cu-u s s s :~~_ie • i ~ ` ° q 2 ~ ~yy ~ .~ ~ ~• yyw ' 4 ! .q q3Q3 ~ 4 • 4 ~~ deb ~~ ig i i 9 _ iZ ~ ! ~ ~ ~qb ~ ~ ~ Sv ~ d d ~ n s 9 d d d s d 3 d d d ~ ~ ~ ~ - F • • - - 76 a6 E6 8 @@ I ~~1 .ii I~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 ~~ $~Be~4 g~~~! ~ 1 I~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ s ~a ~9 ~~ ~~ ~> • /YIN GENSE~ .,. 1. J C~ , j~~R~~g~ ~~~~~~~ a K13 ~~I .r. • V V • ~ M•iin N`MIIx~u•rw we~~mnrvv~•vi~i~p gs~p,•~~.nrlwi e ~~ M z u t - r v ~a np~ ~ u, W a a b U >~z o ~~' w~~ i ~o'u ~~8: ~~~f'ai ~ zea [{ .~ o~- c ~ N5?Q~_S ~€l~i~ J ~~ $ ~~ is ~~ ~ ;~ ~~ Y~ ~z ~~ ~ y 3~ ~~ ~~ °6 ~~ .~~ ~~ r! i ~~ ~~ ~@ ~:~ a~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~. ~~g ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~a~ 3 ~I / 9~ ~ /~ t w.Ymx:iM. iR4R. (C4TOmll. [w V4u) uN B4I{IIICXIfg1 Vy1AllLlls (lOfiCC i4C[) 1wM UNDCR M1IxIwO Ol M1M. 1N.SEm 'MY.x MmKIIS (Mbw R9~NC[S4 RVIIH4) M1103VL41N fCRw. Y.R4S.1. (v~RUUIEO uoc4 oR+xcq 4weuoECns rac. eioux o4rca (xv.x wwccss wou wwivoap .w .GVYTNS MIEx1.1LK RM1Y W MC MU) TMI NF. vmx [x61K CR[6 w0 Mw !lc(p A[FS M u.cuoEU u.xanu. s.ml w4r (s.4w uur wvmuR u.clRxw) LANDSCAPE SECTION AT NORTH SIDE OF BUILDING TO HAVEN AVENUE s~E, Rig. _ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The jiurpose of.th[s;ftirrn is"~to'inforrn the°City of the,basic;compone`rrts~of"th~ proposgi~ pTOjecf so~that,fhe;City may~re'view the project pufsuertt,to,City;policies;•o~dina~icesan#~ ' ~.`~ guide9ines; fhe Calrfomia ~ilvironmerital C3ualityAct;;artd the City.s 12u1es ariid~Prcicedure~~ '"to' Irriplement ~EQhL- ltis;~iinportarif.that the inforrnatioriregiiesfeii an'#hs applii:,atian`I?e „w::i,., ,,='.J nFalai"j~iJ. ,':, 5 C <.; ,:c' 'S'+:"<, y,.,"yr.3.:, ~,o~~'`3 °AM >,f •~e , , .` r[3VIdeC~ to iUII ,'c,<:' ~ ",%s%S„c ; ¢ ° s, a e ?5.<a`~. x` r.., ., ,.. . ..:: , s a INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that R rsthe respons/bddy ofthe applicant to ensure that the appl~catron is complete at the time o1 submittal, Gty staff wdl not be evadable to perform work regwrad to provide mssrg. Applicatron Number for the protect to which this fomr pertams• • Protect Title. ExxonMObil Oil Corporation Name 8 Address o/ protect owner(s) ExxonMobil oil Corporation 3700 SV_ 1 0 h S Torrance, California 90809 Name 8 Address of developer or protect sponsor ExxonMobil Oil Corporation 3700 W. 190th Street Confect Person 8 Address• Fred Fiedler and Associates 2322 W. 3rd Street TnS ATgP~PS~ rn pnns~ Attn: Michael Lim, Project Engineer \\ 1 ~ 11 ~~ H 11NITSTD1.doc3/00 Pape 1 Name 8 Address of person prepanng this fbrrn (d dMerent from • above): Telephone (213) 381-7891 Number. Information md~cated by astensk (') rs not required o/non-construction CUP~s unless othenwse requested bystaff. •1) Fronde a /ull scale (8-112 x 11) copy of the USGS Ouadrent Sheat(s) which rndudes the pro/act site, and indicate the sde boundanes. 2) Fronde a set o(color photographs which show representahvewows /p(Q the sde hom the rarfh, south, east and west, wows IpjQ and jam, the site Irom the pnmary access points which serve the sde, end representative wows o(signrficant features(, the sde. Include a mepshowmglocabon o/each photograph. 3)Pro/ectCocahon(descnbe) NEC Haven Avenue at Town Center Drive 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach eddrtionalsheet rf necessary). 1077-421-038 •5) Gross SMe Area (edsq. ft): 1 . 3 9 Acre S ~8) Net Srte Area (total sde size minus area o/pub/~c streets 8 proposed dedications): 1.13 acres 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which wvuhi affect the pro/ed sde (attach addrtronal sheet dnecessary. None Klan `.J H.~NITSTD1.doc 3/00 Pape 2 . 8)Indude a description o/all pennrts which will be necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies rn order to /ulty implement the prated. Rancho Cucamonga: Building, Street Improvement, Grading, Canooy, Landscape and Fire, County of San Bernadino Health Department ~FOOd and Fuel Sys ml Snn+h C`na at Air nnalit~r +7a na5~pmant District 9)Descnbe the physical setting o/the site as rt exists before the prated rndudrng rn/ormabon on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, Earls and roads, drernage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any exrsbng structures on sde (mdudmg age and condrhon) and fhe use of the strvcures Attach photographs of srgruficant features desrnbed. In adddron, site ell sources of m/ormafron (~ e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, brohc and ercheologrcal surveys, traffic studies). The proposed ExxonMObil site is approximately 1.39 acres located within the larger +/- 11 acres commercial development located between Church Street and Town Center Drive. The ExxonMobil site was graded during the previous development and lays 2-4 feet higher than h 1 ra ion alonr~Haven Avenue_ No ctrnrtnrP. plant, or animal life, trails, roads, or drainage courses were observed at this location. A Type II Gateway exits at the intersection of . H3vPn Avpnve and Tnwn (`enter nrivP~ cahirh is fnll~ 1anAananoA alnnq z Haven Avenue. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects o/the site Sde all souroes o/rnformation (fwoks, published reports end oral history) There are no known cultural and/or historical aspects of this site. K~~ H-~NITSTD1.doc 3/00 Page 3 q aced 001E ~P•lQ1SLN14H Ojy ~{oefoid ay{ {o sale /e~aueB Bwpuncwns ayJ{o ~aloe~eyo ~o a~eos'weped ay1 a6ueyo 1oa/ad pesodaid ay111~ (q{ •padoianap dT~uaoaz azo~s bnzp up-nEg Mau E -- q no a oq gzaaozg •jjEUt arz~s pacoianap Tin; E -_ }sapg aq~ o} ngzadozd •uoT~E}Fban aszads ~Tuo puE panzasgo sEM a3FT iEUITIIE Ou :~Oj '~[IEOEA -- ~SE$ aqq o~ d~zadoSa •uor}E~Tban aszEds puE panzasgo sEM a;-rT iEwtuE ou :qoT ~uEJEA -- t;q.zOpj oq qza ozd :(•o{e'preileei ~seq~es'eBe~ua{7y8ieyJ~uewdo~enep{oa~easpue(a1a'saiolsluewyedep'sdoys 'sasnoyluewyede 5(liwe{-euo) esn pue{odpsuelw'(o{e'~eiyewwoo gequepisei) esn puel{o add{ ey{ eleoipu/ sl~adse o~ueos~o %e~uolsiy '1e~n{/no due pus slew~ue pue s~ueld uo uogeuuo{w 6wpnpw 'seiyedad 6wpunauns ay1 equosep(E{ Fj ~IIaUILt~E~}fj aa$ :.GBSSB~9u p (sJleeys ~euo~yppa yoel{y 7uewer~w yoea {o uoye/dwao pe~edaque ey1 pue 'eseyd yoee ypm ~nooo of luewdo~enep ~0 luepra eyl 'luewdo~enep io{ seseyd pesodad era erayl {i eleorpu~ ~e/ad pesodaid ayt war{ {/nsai pug yo~yn~ esn e{ew~yn{o suuel w eps ay1 {o ualduosap elen6epe ue ep~nad plnoys syl y~elep w toe/ad pesodcvd ey1 equosep(Z/. pasnEO qoa;;a ou aq TirM azagy •anizQ za~ua~ uMOy puE anuan~ uanEg uoiE JT;;EZ~ nq pa~EZaua azE saoznos asrou quazzno at;y . 1oe{{e pint day{ Mo 'sesn pesodard y pue (o{a 'esiou deMpea 'ye~yie) aUs eye loeye AZT/leyl s~enal ~iey~ pue sewnos es~ou due squasep(1 { 15)lnd~cate the type oI shortderm and long-term nose to be generated, mcludmg source and amount. How wdl these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods o/sound proofing are proposed? The proposed fuel sales, convenience store, and car wash operation are compatible ~oith surrounding development and the pI'OpertV 20n1nQ No aiynifir•an impact to ad~arpnf• nrnn_prti pa j, anticipated. '16) Indicate proposed removals andlorreplacements o(mature orscenrc trees Some street trees will require relocation due to•.the development of aright turn pocket along Haven Avenue. These trees will be r io a d in o h modifipA Grrppr lanAcnapp Apaig~n9-- along Haven Avenue. Significant new landscapina will be provided S on the Exxon?4obi1 parcel. 17J Indicate any bodes o/water (mcludmg domestic water supplres) into which the sHe drams. All the on site run off will be captured and treated through catch basins with fossil filters before release to~city storm drains- 18)Ind~eate expected amount o1 water usage (See Attachment A forusage estimates). ForlurtherGanfrahon, please oontad the Cucamonga County WaterDrstnct at 987-2591. a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b Commercralllnd.(gal/daylac)3000 gal/day/acpeakuse (gal/mm/ec) 6000 gal/day/ac 19)Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal. Septic Tank Xx Sewer hseptrc tanks are proposed, attach peroolabon tests Bdischarge to a sandary sewage system rs proposed rnd~cate expected da~ty sewage genereban: (See Attachment A for usage estimates) Forlurther clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987- 2591 a. Residential (gel/day) b. Commeroralllnd. (galldaylec) 2000 gal/day/ac 20) Number ofresrdenhal units Detached (md~cate range orparoel razes, mmrmum lot sae and maximum lot sae Not applicable H:UNITSTD1.dac 3/00 Page,~5 Attached (mdreate whetherunrts are rental orfor sale undsf 21)Ant~cipated range of sale pnces and/orients: Sale Pnce(s) S to Rent (per month) $ ____. fo 22) Specity number ofbedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anbapated household size by unit . type: 24)Ind~cate the expected number o/school children who will beresrdmg wdhin the pro/ecf• Contact the appropnate Schoa Disfncts as shown !n Attachment B. e Elementary b. JunrorHrgh. c Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTR/AL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJEGT~ 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or)unction(s) of commercial, rndustna/ or rnstrtut~onal uses. A retail fuel station with convenience store and coin operator car wash. The facility will be a 24 hour operation and will offer beer and wine sales for off premises consumption. T5) Total Boor area of commeroial, industrial, orrnslduhona! uses by . type. H1INITSTD1.doc 3/00 ~aV Paae~'(o 27) Indicate hours of operation. 24 hour operation 28) Number of Total• 14 employees: - MaxmumShdt 3 shifts Time ofMaxmum ShIB ? n m _ try 1 p =n _ in _ . 29)Pronde breakdown of ant,cpeted pb classficahons, ,ncludng wage and salary ranges, es well as en md,ra6on dthe rale o! lyre /or each classdicahon (aftach adddronal sheet,/necessary). 1) $45-48,000 + bonus for manager; 2) Assistant Mana er $11.00/hr.; 3) 12 employees: 6 part-time at $7.00-$7.50 an hour range; 3 full-time at 57.50 range and 3 fu - imp a S8 00-S8 50 rang • 30) Est~metron of the number of workers fo be h,red that currentty ras,de,n the C,ty. Major number of employees hired within 10 mile radius. Eighty percent hired within City of Rancho Cucamonga '31) For commerc,al end ,ndustnal uses onty, indicate the source, type and amount o/a,r pollution em,ssrons. (Data should be vented through the South Coast A,r oualrty Management D,stnd, at (818) 572-6283): Not applicable -- This is a retail sales operation 32)Have the water sewer, Bra, and flood conbol agenues sernng the project been contaded to determine flier ablty to prowde adequate servroe to the proposed proJed7 pso, p/ease,nd,cate the,rresponse. Yes, no response has been received. H:VNITSTDI doc3/00 Pape H'7 /n the known history o/this property, has there been eny use, storage, ord~scharge ofhazardous andlortoxic materials? 33JExamples of hazardous andlortoxrc materials include, but are not Irmded to PCB~s•redroadrve substances, pestiudes ant herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage ofeny o/the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates oJuse, rl known None; vacant ,~ 34)lMll the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge o/hazardous andlortoxrc materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory o/ell such materials to be used and proposed method ofd~sposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown end labeled on the applicatron plans. The facility will store and dispense to retail customers-both aaaolinP and d1PRP~ f11P~C f~lSr1P sing of fnPl r-t, glLfuel dispenser located under a canoov Und rq o~nd orage of h c fuels includes 3 tanks cantainin (2)-15,000 gallon unleaded (1)-12,000 gallon Super Unleaded, and (1) - 8,000 gallon diesel • l hereby certify that the statements famished above and in the ahached exhibits present the dad and rn(ormetron required for adequate eve/nation o/this protect to the best o/my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and bevel. I /urtherunderstand that additional information maybe required to be submdled be/ore an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date. ~/ / ~ , Signature: yA`1C~~'?"~I/ 6Z~~- Tdle• /~D ~n ,f~ p~~ H:UNITSTD7.doc 3/00 Pape)FS BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: DRC 2001-00437 • 2. Related Files: DRC 2001-00247 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit Exxon Mobile Oil Corooration -The proposed protect is the construction of an automotive fueling station, convenience store and car wash on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Dnve within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The fueling station will include a 3,940 square-foot convenience store, 5,342 square-foot steel canopy, and a 1,152 square-foot coin-operated car wash. The site is located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Dnve on an approximately 139-acre parcel designated Office Park, within the Terra Vista Community Plan (APN 1077-421-038). 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Fred Fiedler and Assoaates 2322 West 3b Street Los Angeles, CA 90057 5. General Plan Designation: Office Park 6. Zoning: Office Park Terra Vista Community Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in Rancho Cucamonga, California. The protect site is located in the Office Park development area of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Property immediately north and east of the site is vacant Approximately 300 feet north of the proposed site is the site of an approved senior assisted living facility. To date, no development of this facility has occurred. West of the site across Haven Avenue is existing commeraal development, and the property south of the site across Town Center Dnve is the Terra Vista Town Center shopping center. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kart Coury (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: Permits to construcUoperate auto fueling station from South Coast Air Quality Management District. Approval of a Hazardous Materials Business Plan by City Office of Emergency Services and San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services. Regional Water Quality Control Board permits for underground storage tanks. ~a3 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one Impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact,° "Potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° or °Less Than Signlflcant Impact° as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ()Land Use and Planning ()Population and Housing (/) Geological Problems (/) Water (/) Air Oua6ty ()Biological Resources ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Hazards ONoise ~/) Mandatory Findings of Sgndu O UhOhes and Service Systems OAesthetics ()Cultural Resources ()Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this Initial evaluation: (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Slgned• Natalie P. Patty Contract Environmental Analyst December 27, 2001 • ~,a~+ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all °Potentially Significant Impact,° "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° and °Less Than Significant Impact° answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources• sw~l Impel Lase Polenflelly Unssss 78an Sipniflrant MlBpeeon Slp,ifieanl No 1 a into leo I a I a LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () (/) ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/) pollees adopted by agencies with furisdiction over the prolect~ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (/) vicinity d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community? Comments• a-d) The site is currently vacant and is located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Dnve, adjacent to existing commercial uses to the west and south Haven Avenue is one of the City's primary major arterial roads, which is forecast to have 36,700 average daily traffic; therefore, is suitable for automobile service related uses, such as a gas station and car wash. Property north and east of the site is vacant land. The proposed fueling station will be consistent with existing land uses as property south of the site is designated Community Commercial, and property north and east of the site is Office Park. The site is designated Office Park within the Terra Vista Community Plan. The designation allows for commercial recreation facilities that are compatible with office use. Automobile service stations are permitted within this designation with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) The applicant has submitted a CUP application and will be required to implement assigned conditions of approval. Potenfleiy Issues and Supporting Information Sources srenK~n Impecl Lass Paentlally Unless Then Signdiranl Mitipetlon Significant Na 1 a Into ratetl I a I a 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? O O O (/) ~,~5 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pwenoany S~wmcant Imped Lns Potanlinly Uniw Thin SipniflcMi Mltlpaian Significam No Im ad Inco reteE I M 1 p b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e g., through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housing? Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The development of the site will include an automotive fueling station, with convenience store and coin-operated car wash. The facility will require 14 full-time/part-time employees The addition of these employees will not create a demand for additional housing as they are likely to be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. c) The 10,434 square-foot establishment will be constructed in an area designated Office Park of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Commercial uses occur to the immediate west and south of the site. Property north and east is vacant with existing commercial development further east. There are no existing residential units within the vicinity of the protect site. Therefore the proposed protect will not impact the existing residences. Pmenuely Issues and Supporting Information Sources: slgnmunt ImPea tw Potmtkly lMlgs Tnen Slgniflcenl M14genan SpnMkant No Im p I tetl I p 1 p 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault ruptures () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shaking? () () (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? () () (/) ( ) d) Seiche hazards? () () () (/) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? () () () (/) h) Expansive sods? () () () (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (/) ~...J ~ac~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00437 Page 5 Comments• a-c) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault. The Red Hdl Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 2 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately five miles northwest. The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude tvl,,, 6.0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M,,,7.5 earthquakes is 13.5 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to fvl„, 8.2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhenng to the Uniform Budding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The protect site is not located near a body of water e) The project site was graded during previous development and lays two to four feet higher than the street elevation along Haven Avenue. The site is relatively flat and is located in a commerciaUoffice area adjacent to Haven Avenue. Therefore, the site is not susceptible to landslides or mudflows. f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the protect for level building pads. Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the Cary . Engineer. The impact is not considered significant as the site is relatively flat with minimal grading required. g-h) Soil type on-site and in the vicinity is Tulunga Soboba association These sods are excessively drained, readily level to moderately sloping sods formed on alluvial fans. Runoff is very slow, and hazard of erosion is slight. They are relatively stable but subject to liquefaction when the water table is shallow New structures are required to meet current earthquake standards as required by the Uniform Budding Code. The impact is not considered significant The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. Pa~bly Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~~m Iona sue vaanlely unNSa mil, Significant Milpegon Significant No I ea Into retetl I a I a 4. WATER. Will the proposal result ~n: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) ~,a~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources. PotenWlty s„r~m Impact Leas Pgentielty Unless Then SgndKVa Mrtreetbn Spnifxanl No Im q Inco raie0 I q I q d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (/) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? () () () (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? () () () (/) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments• a) Development of the protect site is expected to result in decreased absorption rates, increased runoff, and drainage pattern changes. The protect site is located within the Terra Vista Community Plan area Terra Vista is an existing mixed use community plan area with developed infrastructure, including storm drains and sewers The protect site plan shows a conceptual grading plan that will allow the developer to control stormwater runoff on-site and convey it to a catch basin on the east side of the site. Runoff will ultimately be conveyed to the existing storm drain in Town Center Drive. As part of the Community Plan, the protect site included in the gross development of the larger Community Plan area so development of the protect site was previously considered in the Terra Vista infrastructure system. All onsite run off will be captured and treated through catch basins with filters before release to city storm drains. b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated on Exhibit V-5 °Flood Hazards° in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Draft General Plan. c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water. The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed, both during grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied, prior to issuance of a grading permit. I~as Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00437 Page 7 h) The automotive fueling station will include two, 15,000-gallon unleaded underground storage tanks, and one, 20,000-gallon split tank with 12,000 gallons for super unleaded and 8,000 gallons for diesel Underground storage tanks regwre permits from and annual morntonng and reporting to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) -Santa Ana Region. The RWOCB is responsible for permitting and monitoring underground storage tanks in the region and will regwre state-of-the-art, lined tanks with built-in leak detection systems among other requirements. Therefore, the impact will be less than significant. f-i) The prolect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~K Impel Lua paemmly Unleae men Sipn~rant Miegetlon SpnHleem No 1 cl In reied I d I p 5. AIR DUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () () (/) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (/) cause any change in climate? d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects. The criteria pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o). Two of these, ROG and NO^, are ozone precursors Default values were used where protect specific information was unavailable. Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1). The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6'" edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the commercial nature of the proposed prolect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number passenger vehicles and decrease the number of medium/heavy duty diesel truck. The prolect construction and operational emissions do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2). However, since the South Coast Air Basin is ninon-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the prolect contribution to regional emission of cntena pollutants. Generally, construction of a project this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for PM,o and NO, during grading activities, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed Kaq Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds oer Davl Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet. Mit. Unmet Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet. Mit. Gradm 3.75 3.75 50 02 47 52 - - 18.54 8.51 Worker Tn s 0 01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0 03 0.03 0.00 0.00 Stations E ui 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 - 0.03 0.02 0 02 Mobile E w 2.72 2.58 23 76 22.57 - - 1.99 1.89 Arch. Coatm s 7.95 7.55 - - - - - - As halt 0.84 0.80 - - - - - - Totals 15.61 14 84 74 08 70 39 0.03 0 03 20.55 10.42 SCAQMDThres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si mficance No No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds oer Davl SOUfCe ROG NO^ CO PM,o Unmet. Mit. Unmet. Mit. Unmet. Met Unmet. Mit. Area Source 0.00 0.00 0 05 0 05 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 Mobile Source 39.31 39.31 27.44 27 44 323.45 323.45 8.81 8.81 Totals 39.31 39 31 27.49 27 49 323.47 323.47 8.81 8 81 SCAQMDThres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si rnficance No No No No No No No No conditions (operational impacts) for NO,. Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated. There are no sensitive receptors m the area. However, since the state is m non-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust will be mitigated by the following measures. 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. 2. Streets bordering the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions fr1oLm t~hehsite during such episodes. r 1 ~J~J • i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00437 Page 9 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions. b) During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO^ and PM,o levels in the area. The following mitigation measures wdl ensure impacts are at less than significant levels. 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shalt utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. S. Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt. c-d) The proposed protect is to construct an automobile fueling station, a convenience store, and coin-operated car wash This wdl not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes. Control of objectionable odors associated with fueling stations is accomplished by state of the art pumps and nozzles The station operator wdl be responsible for compliance with SCAOMD rules and regulations for operation of an automotive fueling station. Adherence to SCAQMD requirements wdl ensure that the impact is less than significant ~..J Poteniwlly Issues and Supporting Information Sources sgni0ranl Irroetl Less Potentially unless Then Sigrdicanl M2lgetlon Signieeent No I etl I rated 1 tl I tl 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result m a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., () () () (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (/) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or~~iioff2-site? () () () (/) n21 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00437 Page 10 . Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~pnll~q Impeq Lest Pdeniklly Unleu Than S~gnilleaM Mingatlan Signfkent No I q Inro rete0 1 q I q e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists () () () (/) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (/) alternative transportation (e.g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rad or air traffic impacts? O O O (/) Comments• a) Estimated traffic trips were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6"' edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model According to the analysis, the 3,940 square-foot convenience store will generate 3,332 trips and the eight fueling pumps will generate 1,348 trips for a total of 4,680 total trips. These trips will not be all new trips, rather non-diverted link trips from the through lanes on Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. Therefore, protected total traffic trips will not have a significant impact on the surrounding traffic network. The protect site is part of the larger Community Plan area. The City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. In addition, the protect is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site and employee/customer parking on-site Compliance with conditions of approval will ensure that protect-related trips are less than significant b-d) Access to the site will be provided by one, 40-foot driveway on a proposed easUwest street off of Haven Avenue and one, 94-foot driveway on a proposed north/south street off of Town Center Drive The proposed streets will direct traffic from Haven Avenue (a mator divided arterial) and Town Center Drive (a special secondary arterial) and eliminate the stacking of vehicles onto these streets. Driveways on the proposed streets will allow full access without impeding the through traffic. Access for emergency vehicles are adequate with one, 40-foot driveway and one, 94-foot driveway. e/f) The new facility will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists because adequate points of ingress/egress have been provided and there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate visitors. No bus turnout has been provided. g) Located approximately six miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. ~,3a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DRC 2001-00437 Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources• S~a; t hryap Lass PotanM1aly Unless 711M Sgntlmant Mnlpanon SIQOIlK211I No Im p Inco raletl Im d Im q 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (/) habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e g., heritage trees, () () () (/) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () () () (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and () () () (/) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors () () () (/) Comments• a) The site is currently vacant and is located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive with the Office Park development area of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The property is north and outside of the Ontario Recovery Unit as indicated in Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly habitat Onsite vegetation consists mainly of non- native species including Russian thistle (tumbleweed), mustard, oats and cheatgrass. It is unlikely that any DSF will move on to the site due to the lack of natural habitat and surrounding development including Haven Avenue. b-c) The westernmost portion of the site includes existing landscaping Approximately three trees will be relocated to accommodate construction of the new street to be located off of Haven Avenue and that will run the length of the northern boundary. These trees will be utilized in the modified street landscape design plan along Haven Avenue. The impact is not considered significant. d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The presence of bordering commercial development within the area has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past K33 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Issues and Supporting Information Sources• s'gnin ;m Impeq Lex Poteaielly Unbx Tnen Sgnllicent Mitigelion SlgnlllceM No Im q Inro raatl I a I d 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner? c) Result m the loss of avadabdity of a known O O O (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments: a-b) The protect will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. • c) The prolect site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. Paennolry Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~g^^~nt Impact Lex Paeniklly Unbss Tnan Signifkant Mrtgetbn Srendroenl No Im q Inco retetl Im q I q 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () (/) () ( ) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to• oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () (/) ( ) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (/) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a/C) The proposed prolect includes an automotive fueling station with eight (8) self- service pumps. The gasoline will be stored in three (3) lined, underground storage -~i 3~} Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 tanks including two, 15,000-gallon tanks, and one split tank including one section with 12,000-gallon holding capacity and one section with 8,000-gallon holding capaaty The applicant will obtain appropriate permits from both the County of San Bernardino Hazardous Material Division and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract. The following mitigation measure will ensure impacts are less than significant. 9. All appropriate permits will be obtained prior to certificate of occupancy and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services (Fire Protection District) Office. These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to less than significant impact. b) The proposed protect includes two adequate 40-foot and 94-foot driveways for emergency response vehicles. The site is currently vacant with non-native vegetation. The site will be graded and landscaped in accordance with approved plans. c) The proposed sale of gasoline at the service station will expose people to vapors containing benzene, a known carcinogen. However, due to state-of-the-art equipment currently installed m service stations, these exposures fall below significant thresholds set by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), therefore this is a less than significant impact. d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils were observed onsite. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. e) The protect site is located within a developing commercial/office area Development of the site will remove dry vegetation and continued development of the area will decrease the potential of fire within the vicinity Paleneally Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ Impeq less Potentially Unleee Then Sgnificent ALtipetron Sipnihcanl No Im eci Inco atetl 1 ed I p 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? () () (/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (/) Comments: C J a-b) The protect would increase noise levels since the site is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area Noise will be consistent with existing levels, which includes traffic noise from surrounding commercial use, Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive There are currently no sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the site. Approximately 300 feet north of the protect site is the site of an approved senior assisted living facility To date no development of that site has occurred. The proposed assisted living facility, if constructed, will be K35 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 located near the Town Center The Community Plan allows for commercial recreation facilities that are compatible with office use Automobile service stations are permitted within this designation with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Noise associated with the proposed fueling station will be typical of commercial developments. Therefore noise from the site is not considered significant. Potenbalty Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sipniraznt Impad Lacq Polantlalty Unlau 7Mn Spnificant Mnipaaon Sipndirsnt No Im h Inco raleE I C I p 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result rn a need for new or altered government services many o/the /ollowmg areas: a) Fire protection? () () () (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? () () () (/) e) Other governmental services? () () () (/) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The site is located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community Plan area, and is served by a fire station located on the southwest corner of Jersey and Milliken, approximately four miles southeast of the protect site. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur. Police Protection -Additional police protection is not required as the protect site is within an area that is developed or proposed for development and is currently patrolled. The addition of an automobile fueling station with convenience store and car wash on a 1.39-acre lot will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled. Schools -The proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new tob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area. Operation of the automobile fueling station, convenience store and car wash will require 14 employees. Approximately 80 percent of the employees will be hired from within the City. The remaining employees will likely be from surrounding communities. Therefore, construction/operation activities will not adversely impact local schools. Parks -Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new tob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area. Approximately 80 percent of the proposed 14 employees will be hired from within the City. Therefore, construction and operation of the automobile fueling station, n ~J ~J ~0 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 convenience store and car wash will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities. Public facilities - The protect is within an existing Community Plan area. Commercial development occurs west and south of the site. The protect will utilize existing facilities within the currently developed vicinity and will modify the existing driveway on Haven Avenue to accommodate a larger more appropriate 40-foot driveway. This improvement and any other improvements will be the responsibility of the applicant. Therefore the impact is not considered significant. n Issues and Supporting Information Sources• sgn~ra~ Imlact Leas Potentially Unbaa Than Sgnl/ram Mnpatron S9nifrani No Im aq Into rated Im q Im d 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result rn a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utrlit~es: a) Power or natural gasp () ( ) () (/) b) Communication systems () ( ) () (/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () ( ) () (/) facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks () ( ) () (/) e) Storm water drainages () ( ) () (/) f) Solid waste disposals () ( ) () (/) g) Local or regional water supplies () ( ) () (/) Comments• a-g) The protect will use existing gas, electrical and communication systems. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. The protect will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the currently vacant site. However, the Community Plan area has been developed with infrastructure to support development within the Plan area. The impact is not considered significant since it can be accommodated by providing stormwater drainage per approved grading and drainage plan. CJ Polenaalty Issues and Supporting Information Sources• spninaent Impap Lesa Pdantlalty Unless Than Signdrenl Miagatlon Significant No Im q Intro reletl I q 1 q 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway U O O (/) ~i 3~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Paenaaly Issues and Supporting Information Sources signnrcea Impact Lasa Paeneally Unkss clan Signtliami Mapegm Sgnl@ani No Im ea Inro reteC Im a 1 ea b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? () () () (/) c) Create light or glares () () () (/) Comments• a) The protect site is located within the Office Park development area of the Terra Vista Community Plan and is surrounded by vacant and commercial uses. Design guidelines and criteria have been established for the Terra Vista community in order to assure that a wide range of individual development can blend harmoniously. The proposed project will be constructed in accordance with design guidelines set forth in the plan. For example, construction of the fueling station, convenience store and car wash was designed in accordance with required setbacks, exterior elements and landscaping Existing landscaping at the site includes a Type II Gateway on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive Type II gateways, as described in the Terra Vista Community Plan, occupy triangular plots of land at intersections and extend approximately 30 feet along each of the two intersecting streets The area contains landscaping that coordinates with other landscaping in the area. The proposed protect includes preserving the gateway and providing extensive landscaping on the protect site. Implementation of the proposed protect will blend with existing commercial development and will not have a significant aesthetic impact in the area. b) The proposed protect is located in an area designated Office Park and proposed uses will be consistent with the goals and objectives set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Terra Vista Community Plan. The proposed design and exterior elements of the project will be consistent with design standards set forth in the plan. c) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which require review for consistency with City standards The impact is not considered significant as there are no sensitive receptors in the area. Paemlelry Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signmua Impea Leas PaenHally Unless Tftan Significant Maigaiian Signditenl W Im a Into read I a I a 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb Paleontological resources b) Disturb archaeological resources c) Affect historical or cultural resources? i • O U O (/) O U O (/) . O O O (/) K38 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Issues and Supporting Information Sources• se n~~m Impact LBSq Polaniialty Unless Then Signlhwnl Mibgetlan Significant No Im C Inco rated Im h Im q d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (/) the potential impact area? Comments• a-e) The site is on an alluvial fan, an environment not generally associated with fossils As the site is relatively small, and has been previously disturbed, the likelihood of affecting historical or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered significant. PoleMklty Issues and Supporting Information Sources. signmcanl Impact Leas Potentlalty Unless 7Mn SignlLCant Mnigelim Signifirant No Im cl Inco retell Im ed Im d 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? () () () (/) Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is unlikely as the proposed automobile fueling station, convenience store and car wash will be constructed on a 1.39-acre parcel and will employee 14 individuals with approximately 80 percent to be hired from within the City. The remaining employees will likely be hired from neighboring communities and will not have a significant impact on regional parks. b) The proposed protect will not affect existing recreational opportunities as the site is zoned Office Park and is located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan development area The site itself is not suitable for recreational proposes as surrounding property is zoned Office Park and Community Commercial. The protect is regionally small and will have no impacts to recreational facilities Y,3q Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00437 Page 18 PalenOelry Issues and Supporting Information Sources• spnlnuni Impea Less Polenllely Unless Tften SgniLCent Mnigetian S~pnHMant NO Im n m<o relea I n I a 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have () () () (/) the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () (/) () ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that () () () (/) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ('Cumulatively considerable° means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future protects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) The Initial Study did not identify any significant adverse impacts to biological resources. The site is currently vacant and is located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive with the Office Park District of the Terra Vista Community Plan. The property is north and outside of the Ontario Recovery Unit as indicated in Figure 6 of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly habitat Onsite vegetation consists mainly of non-native species including Russian thistle (tumbleweed), mustard, oats and cheatgrass. It is unlikely that any DSF will move on to the site due to the lack of natural habitat and surrounding development including Haven Avenue. n L_ J ~~ Initial Study for . DRC 2001-00437 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 b) The protect does not sacrifice long-term environmental goals to achieve short term environmental obtectives. Protect related impacts identified in the Initial Study are related to grading/construction and cultural resources that can be mitigated to less than significant levels. c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulatroe impacts is regwred. d) Development of the automobile fueling station with convenience store and car wash would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The initial study identified impacts to air quality as having a potentially significant affect to the environment However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce the impacts to less than significant K41 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00437 EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed m the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Irntial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (/) City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (October 2001) (/) Terra Vista Community Plan, Rancho Cucamonga (February 1996) K~+a • rent By FflED FZEDLER 8 ASSDDIATEBi 01/30/2002 11x11 9094772701 Initlel Study for nee+ ennt _nru'i7 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I cortlly that 1 am the apDllcant far the Drojact desrnbed in this Inlrel have read this Inltlal Studyend/or hereby agree topthe proposed m projeM Plane or propalrJe the efleets or mlttpata the effects to a po1M where daary no sipnr Wald occur.//'']]~~,//~~ Sipnatun: ~e'.L ~ Date: Print Name ((en/d/ Title: f~CUern skein, Pia Aaneho Cueamenga Page 21 ~.1 aoknowledpe that 1 er, 1 heva revised the m measur8s to avad BrilAronmant8l affects r fJ /ytana~.e~ ~o~Ownei'. 1 _~- -~'. K 4-3 213 381 15171 ~en•,a-vc ~.•...r PgGE 22/22 [JtG City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Cond~honal Use Permd DRC2001-00437 Public Review Period Closes: January 23, 2002 Project Name: Project Applicant: Exton Mobil Oct Corporation Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drne - APN 107721-38 Project Description: A request to construct a new 3,946 square foot sernce station wAh convenience market, drne-thru carwash, and pump island on 1 39 acre of land in the Office Park Distract of the Terra vista Commundy Plan Related file Preliminary Review DRC2001-00247. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to determine ff the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaret~on based upon the following finding: ~ The Inrtial Study shows that there n; no substantial evidence that the proled may have a slgrnficant effect on the environment ® The In~hal Study identified potentially stgmficant effects but (1) Revisions in the proled plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwouki avod the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no sigrnficant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the proled as revised may have a sign~icant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The projedfile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. C January 23.2002 Date of Determination sy K44 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 10.40 a.m. Kirt Coury November 20, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION - A request to construct a new 3,946 square foot service station with convenience market, dnve-thru car wash and pump island on 1.39 acres of land, located at the northeast comer of Haven Avenue and Town Center Dnve in the Office Park District or the Terra Vista Community Plan - APN. 1077-421-38. Related files Preliminary Rewew DRC2001-00247. Desion Parameters: The site is located at the northeast comer of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. The lot is 1.39 acres located within the larger vacant block of 11 acres located between Church SUeet and Town Center Dnve. The site is rough graded and is 2-4 feet higher than the street elevation along Haven Avenue. Some street Vees will require relocation due to the development of a right tum pocket along Haven Avenue. These trees will be relocated into the modified street landscape design plan along Haven Avenue. Significant new landscaping will be provided on-site. A Type II gateway exists at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Town Center Dnve, which is fully landscaped along Haven Avenue. North and east of the site is vacant undeveloped land. To the west across Haven Avenue is a developed commercial shopping center. South of the site across Town Center Drive is a new Sav-On drug store. The project will include a 3,946 square foot convenience store, a 1,152 square foot coin operated car wash, and a 5,346 square foot steel canopy with 8 fueling dispensers. The facility will store and . dispense to retail customers both gasoline and diesel fuels. The site will be developed in one phase. The facility Hall be a 24-hour operation and will offer beer and wine sales for off premises consumption. The convenience store budding height is approximately 30 feet, and the carwash budding height is approximately 18 feet. The architectural style is similar to Terra Vista Town Center, and includes a stucco finish with foam and stucco covered wood trim treatment, a tower element, tube steel Vellis elements, decorative wall file insets, and a standing seam copper panel roof. The mator differences from Terra Vista Town Center are the metal roof material and lack of stone veneer wainscot. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project The architectural treatment and cornice element along the west elevation should match or resemble the treatment of the east elevation. The west elevation (faGng Haven Avenue) vwll be the most viewed elevation. 2. Building pop-outs representing horizontal variation should pop-out a minimum of 3 feet off of the main building for shadowing and relief. Pop-out treatments should be reflected on the bwlding footprints of the proposed Site Plan, Grading Plan, Landscape Plan, and Floor Plan. 3 The entrance pop-out tower element should be increased out approximately 5 to 6 feet for more character and definition to the front entrance. 4. Add a wood trellis structure with columns over the dnve-thru lane along the west elevation. ~~ ~- ~, K 45 DRC COMMENTS CUP DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORP. November 20, 2001 Page 2 Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee wdl discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The proposed sign element on the front entrance of the convenience store is too large for the bwlding. The letters are 4 feet tall and the overall sign height is 6 feet, which would be characteristic of a mayor anchor store Staff would suggest 24-inch high letters. 2 Add natural concrete frame representation around the proposed ceramic file accents. Further, add ceramic file accents with framing to the convenience store north, south, and west elevations and to all elevations of the carwash building and canopy structure. 3. Increase the reveal expansion on building face to a minimum of 2 inches. 4. Prowde a bus shelter on-site to serve the new bus bay on Haven Avenue. 5. The wood brackets of the rooftop tower structure should be substantial in size to avoid a spindly appearance or the number of brackets increased. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised and return to Design Review Committee. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, John Mannerino, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Icirt Coury The Committee recommended the project incorporate all mafor and secondary issues previously identified above as well as the item shall be brought back for further review regarding the issues listed below: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Incorporate a file wainscot treatment Use 3-inch thick tubular steel for proposed trellis treatment Prowde textured pavement along arculation and pedestrian access points. Enhance the canopy design, with roof variation, wainscot treatment, etc. The architectural design should use the same style/theme as the Terra Vista Town Center. ~~ • K~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS Kart Coury December 4, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION - A request to construct a new 3,946 square foot service station with convenience market, dnve-thru car wash and pump island on 1.39 acres of land, located at the northeast comer of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Office Park Distnct or the Terra Vista Community Plan-APN: 1077-421-38. Related files. Preliminary Review DRC2001-00247. Background• On November 20, 2001, the Design Review Committee reviewed the project and recommended the applicant make revisions and come back to the December 4, 2001, Design Revew Committee meeting Because of short notice, the applicant will bnng a revised set of plans to the meeting. The following are issues that should be addressed at the meeting: Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues wdl be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect: 1 The architectural treatment and cornice element along the west elevation should match or resemble the treatment of the east elevation. The west elevation (faGng Haven Avenue) wdl be the most weaved elevation The budding character and site design should resemble and be more consistent with the architectural style found in the Terra Vista Shopping Center. 2. Budding pop-0uts representing honzontal vanation should pop-0uta minimum of 3 feet off of the main building for shadowing and relief. Pop-out treatments should be reflected on the budding footpnnts of the proposed Site Plan, Grading Plan, Landscape Plan, and Floor Plan. 3 The entrance pop-out tower element should be increased out approximately 5 to 6 feet for more character and definition to the front entrance. 4. Add a wood trellis structure with columns over the drive-thru lane along the west elevation. 5. Incorporate a Ule, real river rock, or stacked stone wainscot treatment 6. Provide textured pavement along circulation and pedestnan access points. 7 Enhance the canopy design, and incorporate wainscot treatment Secondary Issues. Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and Ume permitting, the Committee wdl discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The proposed sign element on the front entrance of the convenience store is too large for the building The letters are 4 feet tall and the overall sign height is 6 feet, which would be characteristic of a mayor anchor store Staff would suggest 24-inch high letters. 2. Add natural concrete frame representation around the proposed ceramic file accents. Further, add ceramic file accents with framing to the convenience store north, south, and west elevations and to all elevations of the canvash budding and canopy structure. 3. Increase the reveal expansion on budding face to a minimum of 2 inches. 4. Prowde a bus shelter on-site to serve the new bus bay on Haven Avenue. K4~ DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION December 4, 2001 Page 2 5. The wood brackets of the rooftop tower structure should match or resemble those of other tower elements in nearby shopping centers 6. Use 3-inch thick tubular steel for proposed trellis treatment Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be revised and return to Design Review Committee Design Review Committee Action• Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Kirt Coury The item was continued to December 18, 2001 at the applicant's request ~~ r~ U ~~ K4~$ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m Kart Coury December 18, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION - A request to construct a new 3,946 square foot service station with convenience market, dnve-thru car wash and pump island on 1 39 acres of land, located at the northeast comer of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Office Park Distnct or the Terta Vista Community Plan - APN. 1077-421-38. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2001-00247. Backoround: On November 20, 2001, the Design Review Committee reviewed the project and rewmmended the applicant make revisions and come back to the December 4, 2001, Design Revew Committee meeting. Because of short notice, the applicant wdl bring a revised set of plans to the meeting. The following are issues that should be addressed at the meeting: Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project 1. The architectural treatment and cornice element along the west elevation should match or resemble the treatment of the east elevation. The west elevation (faang Haven Avenue) Hell be the most viewed elevation. The building character and site design should resemble and be more consistent with the architectural style found in the Terra Vista Shopping Center. 2. Building pop-outs representing horizontal vanation should pop-out a minimum of 3 feet off of the main building for shadowing and relief. Pop-0ut treatments should be reflected on the building footprints of the proposed Site Plan, Grading Plan, Landscape Plan, and Floor Plan. 3. The entrance pop-out tower element should be increased out approximately 5 to 6 feet for more character and definition to the front entrance. 4. Add a wood trellis structure with columns over the drive-thru lane along the west elevation. 5. Incorporate a tile, real nver rock, or stacked stone wainscot treatment 6. Provide textured pavement along circulation and pedestnarl access points. 7. Enhance the canopy design, and incorporate wainscot treatment Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The proposed sign element on the front entrance of the convenience store is too large for the building. The letters are 4 feet tall and the overall sign height is 6 feet, which would be characteristic of a major anchor store. Staff would suggest 24-inch high letters. • 2. Add natural concrete frame representation around the proposed ceramic file accents. Further, add ceramic Ule accents with framing to the convenience store north, south, and west elevations and to all elevations of the carwash building and canopy structure. 3 Increase the reveal expansion on bwlding face to a minimum of 2 inches. K 4-q DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION December 18, 2001 Page 2 4. Provde a bus shelter on-site to serve the new bus bay on Haven Avenue. 5. The wood brackets of the rooftop tower structure should match or resemble those of other tower elements in nearby shopping centers. 6. Use 3-inch thick tubular steel for proposed trellis treatment. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised and return to Design Review Committee. The Committee recommended the project incorporate all major and secondary issues previously identified above as well as the item shall be brought back for further review regarding the issues listed below: 1. Incorporate a file wainscot treatment. 2 Use 3-inch thick tubular steel for proposed trellis tneatment. 3. Provide textured pavement along arculation and pedestrian access points. . 4. Enhance the canopy design, with roof variation, wainscot treatment, etc. 5. The architectural design should use the same style/theme as the Terra Vista Town Center. PLANS WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE MEETING Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Kirt Coury , The Committee was pleased with the progress in the design of the project and recommended the protect incorporate the following revisions and be brought back for further review on January 9, 2002 with the following conditions: 1 Provide a Master Plan for the vacant land surrounding the proposed project area. 2. Modify the file roof overhang on the north and south elevations to eliminate the "dangling/left-over" appearance. Incorporate columns. 3. Incorporate molding around the bwlding door entrance. • 4. Remove file insets and replace with vertical score lines on the canopy structure, car wash and main building in appropriate areas 5. Add decorative masonry cap to proposed 3-foot high masonry screen wall. K5o . RESOLUTION NO 02-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00437, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 3,946 SQUARE FOOT SERVICE STATION WITH A CONVENIENCE MARKETTO INCLUDE OFF-SALE BEER AND WINE (TYPE 20 LICENSE), DRIVE-THRU CAR WASH, AND PUMP ISLAND ON 1 39 ACRE OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE IN THE OFFICE PARK DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN - APN 1077-421-38 A Recitals 1 Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00437, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Conditional Use Pertnit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 23rd day of January 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on January 23, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, togetherwdh public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property loa3ted at the northeast comerof Haven Avenue and Town Center Dnve with a street frontage of 225 feet on Haven Avenue and 630 feet on Town Center Dnve, and is presently vaa3nt and rough graded, and b The property to the north and east is vaa3nt and zoned Office Park Distnct of the Terra Vista Community Plan, the property to the south is developed with existing commeraal retail buildings and zoned Community commeraal of the Terra Vista Community Plan, and property to the west is also developed with existing commeraal retail bwldmg and zoned General commeraal, and c The applia3tion contemplates the development of a 3,946 square foot service station with convenience market to include off-sale beer and wine (type 20 license), with dnve-thru car wash and pump island on 1 39 acre of land, with 24 hours of operation, and d The entire site is zoned Office Park Distnct and is governed by the regulations of the Ten-a Vista Community Plan and the Development Code, and KSI PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-24 DRC201-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 2 e The protect fosters creative and efficient use of the land by combining fuel service, car wash service, and convenience market service, and f The protect design reflects a quality architectural statement that creatively blends traditional budding matenals such as wood, stucco, and tde roofing consistent with the architectural flavor of the Terra Vista Community Plan area 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is m accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct m which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Decaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all signiFicant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations K5a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-24 DRC201-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnna Diwsion 1) Light fixtures shall be constructed at a maximum height of 15 feet, including pedestal base (as measured from finished grade), and shall be shielded A detailed Lighting Plan, including a photometnc diagram, shall be prepared pnor to issuance of building permits to provide proper shielding of light sources from adjoining properties 2) The extenor buldng matenals and colors including architectural details such as, but not limited to, file and the random stacking of booster tiles, cornice, outnggers, lumber size, file inset, wainscot, light fixtures, window mullion patterns, and tubular steel trellis, shall be consistent vnth Sav-On and the Terra Vista Town Center 3) Textured pavement across arculation pathways including an 8- to 12-inch smooth banding shall be provided as shown on the Site Plan 4) A minimum 5-foot landscape stnp consisting of trees, shrubs, and appropnate ground cover with irngation shall be provided along the north and east boundary of the site 5) Provide substantial tree and shrub planting between the dnve-thru lane and the streets to create a dense screen for the dnve-thru lane 6) Existing Haven Avenue landscaping shall be renovated to restore R to a healthy condition, including replacement of dead or dying plant matenals, as necessary 7) Landscaping shall conform to the Development Code, Terra Vista Community Plan, and Haven Avenue beautification master plan requirements, and shall require review and approval by the City Planner pnor to installation 8) All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debns and maintained in a healthy growing condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and tnmming 9) The master plan submitted with the application is conceptual only and is not included in this approval Enaineenna Diwsion 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements shall be constructed in accordance with City "Ma1or Divided Artenal" standards, as regwred and including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, removal and reconstruction of access ramp per current design standards, streetlights, and traffic signage (R26) K5 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-24 DRC201-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION January 23, 2002 Page 4 2) Provde a bus bayinght-tum lane for the dnveway on Haven Avenue per City standards and dnveway policy 3) Protect all existing traffic signal egwpment in place or repair as needed 4) Town Center Dnve frontage improvements shall be constructed in accordance v~nth City "Collector" standards, as regwred and including, but not limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, and traffic signage (R26) 5) The dnveway approach on Town Center Dnve shall align opposite with the existing dnveway on the south side, in accordance v~nth City "Dnveway Policy" 6) Provide 'Two Way Left-Tum" lane on Town Center Dnve 7) No drainage onto public streets from pnvate dnveways Water shall be collected into pipe or channeled through under-sidewalk drains B) The applicant shall process a Lot Line Adjustment to establish properly boundanes, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, pnor to the issuance of budding permits . ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES Arr Quabty 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Streets bordenng the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inadrve construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based onlow-emission factors and high-energy effiGency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's speafications K5~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-24 DRC201-00437 -EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION • January 23, 2002 Page 5 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean-alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 8) Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt Hazards 1) All appropnate permits will be obtained pnor to certificate of occupancy and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services (Fire Protection Distnct) Office 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Larry T McNiel, Chamnan Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of January 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS K55 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ~ PROGRAM Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00437 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigaton measures identified in the'(Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed pro/ect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the pro/ect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon • recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be in place through all phases of the protect The pro/ect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The pro/ect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 K5(n Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00437 January 17, 2002 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of budding permits K5~ MITIGATION MO Project File No.: DRC 2001-00437 I iti l NITORING C A HECKLIST pplicant: (INITIAL ST Fred Fielder and UDY PAR Associates T III) n a Study Prepared by: _ Natalie P. Pattv D ate: December 27 2 001 ~:• ~:s.,,~. , . . 'rrt. The site shall be treated with water or other Boll stabilizing agent) CP C approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o Review of plans A/C 2 emisslon, In accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Streets bordedng the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoclatetl with CP C Review of plans A/C vehlGe trecking of soil off-site Timing may very depending upon time of year of construction 2 Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from th i CP e s te dudng such episodes C Review of plans A/C 2 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas th t a remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions CP C Review of plans A/C 2 Contractor shall select the construction equipment based on low emisslon factors and high-energy efficiency All construction equipment will be tuned and maintained In accordance with the CP B/C Review of plans q/C manufacturers speclFlcatlons 2 Contractor shall utilize electdc or clean altemetive fuel powered equipment where feasible CP C Review of plans A/C Tha construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading 2 plans Include a statement that work crews will shut oN equipment when not in use CP/CE B Review of plans C 2 Contractor shall use low volatile organic compounds (VOC) coatings and as halt CP C Review of plans A/C 2 p `s ~,' < "' All appropdate permits will be obtained do t if ~ FC p r o cert icate of occupancy and must be documented In a Business D Review of plans p 3 Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the Clty Emergency Services (Fire Protection Dlstrid) Office ~ i • Key to Checklist Abbreviations CDD -Community De CP - Clty Planner or tl CE - CItY Engineer or BO - Building OHiclal or PO -Police Captflin or i FC - Fira Chief or deslc Director A - W Ith Each New Developr B - Prior To Construction C -Throughout Construction r D - On Completion E - Ooeratina I \PLANNING\FINAL\CEOAWIMCHKLST WPD r^ V , A - On-site Inspection B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENI~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00437 A 3,946 SQUARE FOOT SERVICE STATION WITH CONVENIENCE MARKET, DRIVE- SUBJECT: THRU, CAR WASH, AND FUEL PUMP ISLAND APPLICANT: EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comole6on Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard / / Conditions, shall be included in legible fonn on the grading plans, building and construction _ _ _ plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shalt expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and _ _ _ grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations • 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner _ _ _ K lob S~_„-0, Prged N o DRC2001-00437 Comolehon Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Budding and Safety Dvision to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits _ _ _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ / consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ bulding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / / all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ _ time of bulding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / / by the Cdy Planner and Police Department (477-2800) pnor to the issuance of bulding permits _ _ _ Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/ the number of trash receptacles shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the _ issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete _ _ _ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape _ maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of budding permits D. Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, _// free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc , shall be utilized and be compatible _ with the archdectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City _/_/ Planner _ a Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the protect) _/_/_ b Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to / / include self-closing pedestrian doors _ _ _ c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins / / • d Roll-up doors _ _ _ / / _ _ _ e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids / / K~o I s~.,,-0, z Project No DRC2001-00437 f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view 3 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shail trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 5 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " 6 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants Comolehon Date -/_/ / /~ / / / / -/-/- Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an /_/_ exterior noise level of 60 d6 during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 d6 during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or _/_/. other handling of boxes, crates, containers, budding materials, garbage cans, or other similar obtects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 7 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza _/_/_ They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza I _/_/ area lighting fixtures, budding lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures 9 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into I _/_/_ the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of budding permits E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from ad/scent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans For commercial and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main / / bulding colors --- F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/. a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) • Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses SC-11-01 g Ktoa Protect No DRC2007-00437 Completion Date 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / / and exits shall be striped per City standards _ _ _ 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercal and office facilities with 25 or more / / parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of _ _ _ stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/ / residential protects or more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the requred _ _ automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 btcycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/ / the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and _ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in / / accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The _ _ _ location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be • shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial pro/ects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/ commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger _ 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one / / tree per 30 linear feet of building _ _ _ 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included _/_/_ in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 8 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specmen size trees, meandering _/ / sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Haven Avenue _ _ 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the / / perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer _ _ _ 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/ / design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division _ _ S~_„~, 4 Klo3 Protect N o DRC2001-00437 Comolehon Date 11 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval _/_/ prior to tssuance of budding permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth ~ characteristics of the selected tree speaes 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/ Xeriscape as defined to Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mumctpal Code _ H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require _ _ _ separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs I. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The appltcant is responsible for the cost of / / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requred to _ _ _ post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Ctty Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the tssuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the Ctty to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all acticns required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies 1 The appltcant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/ / of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the tssuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans SC-11-01 5 ' `~ 7 Project N o DRC2001-00437 ComoleGon Date 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report / / • Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal _ _ _ 3 Separate permits are requred for fencing and/or walls / / 4 Contractors must show proof of State and Cdy licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to I / the City prior to permit issuance _ _ _ 5 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / / Budding and Safety Division _ _ _ L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be / / marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest _ _ _ adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electnc Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commeraal or industrial development or additicn / / to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate _ _ _ Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Dvision prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwldmg Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and / / prior to issuance of budding permits _ _ _ 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday / / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays _ _ _ 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public / / counter) _ _ M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering _/ / use, area, and fire-resistiveness _ _ 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental / / Health Services prior to issuance of building permits _ _ _ 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table / / - 5-A -- 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating m accordance with UBC Table 5-A / / 6 Openings in extenor walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A I / 7 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906 / / Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be m accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City _/ I Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in _ _ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan Kln5 s~.,,-0, s Protect No DRC2001-00437 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertonn such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved poor to Issuance of bwlding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed wail generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomia Registered Crvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per Clty Standards 2 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, droves, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded pnor to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Ail existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 6 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided P. Street Improvements 1 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited tc Street Name Curb & AC Side- Dnve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Haven Avenue x x c x x x Town Center x x x x Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Comolehon Date I /_ - - -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- L~ SC-11-01 7 ' `~ `!' Protect No DRC2001-00437 ComoleGOn Date 2 Improvement Plans and Construction . a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights / / on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil _ _ _ Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction / / permit shall be obtained from the Ctty Engineer's Office in addition to any other pennits _ _ _ required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and / / interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _ _ _ d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / / protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and _ _ _ interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Puil boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at tntersecttons) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified . e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/ Standards or as directed by the Ctty Engineer _ f Existing Ctty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash _ _ _ deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots _ _ _ h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner pnor to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ 3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program _ _ _ 4 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / / adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all pro/ect _ _ _ intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as requved Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pnor to final map approval or issuance of bwlding _ _ _ permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / / developer until accepted by the City _ _ _ SC-11-01 8 ~ ~~ Prged N o DRC2001-00437 Comoletion Date 3 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective / / Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue _ _ R. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/ approval or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall _ be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the / / property from ad/scent areas _ _ 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/ / from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk _ _ S. Utilities , Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility _ Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/ / Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the _ _ Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential • protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a /oint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of / / building permits, whichever occurs first, for Haven Avenue _ _ _ 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / / new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to _ _ _ building permit issuance ~f no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be invandal-resistant fixtures • / / _ _ _ Sc-„-0, 9 KloB Protect No DRC200t-00437 Comolehon Date ~V. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used W. Windows 1 Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic 2 Security glazing is recommended on store front windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars X. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibtOty Y. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and to tum save dollars and lives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided wdh the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING NDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~-~- -~-~. sc-11-01 10 ~~~ Fire Ihsmct Conditions- Incompleteness Comments Page 1 of 5 f '-~~~•'~~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 3 s - ~, _J FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0492-A PROJECT#: DRC2001-00437 PROJECT NAME: Exxon/Mobil Station - On the Run DATE: November 20, 2001 PLAN TYPE: CUP-Gas Station w/ Canopy/Mine-mart /Car Wash APPLICANT NAME: Western Land Properties OCCUPANCY TYPE: S-3/M/B FLOOR AREA (S): 5 338 sf/3490 sf/1152 sf CONSTRUCTION: I I-NN-N/I I LOCATION: NEC Haven and Town Center Drive • FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Kart Coury ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire District regwrements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire Distract regwrements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review Prior to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed All Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Community Factlities Distracts 1 This protect is subtect to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new publ~ fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Prior to the essuance of any buildeng permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specefications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for revew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards K~O Fire D~stnc[ Coodmons- locompleteous Commeatt Page 2 of 5 3 Fire flow requirements for this prolect shall be 2250 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 When any portion of a facility or bulding is located in excess of 150-feet from a fve hydrant located on a public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 5 All regwred public fve hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fire Construction Services representatroe shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 8 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the prolect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 9 Prior to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground . 10 Reqwred Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the budding permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 11 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a budding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avadabddv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requrements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow D. Fire Access 1 Commercial Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tracUparcel map or the issuance of any grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roads to • within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site 2 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fve District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end ~~ Fire Distract Condmoos- Incompleteoas Comments Page 3 of 5 street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), cont~ gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the F Distract, Fire Safety Dvision 3 The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 4 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bwlding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specrfic details and ordering information 5 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 6 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire Distract Standards 7 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard. 6 Prior to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the fue lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identrfy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes ~ 9 New bwldings other than dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 10 In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwlding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or bwidings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga E. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times F. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permd, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal G. Fire Suppression System (Required for Commeraal Cooking Eqwpment or Special Hazards) 1 Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit, plans and specifications for the fire suppression system for the prole of commeraal-type cooking equipment shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services far review and approval work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 2 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Kea Fire D~smc[ Condmons- Incompleteness Comments Page 4 of 5 Fire Service Construction Services . H. Fire District Fees Due Fire District tee(s), plus a $1 00 microftlm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows $82 Start-up fee for commeraal, industrial or mutt)-fam0y dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Prnrate Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new bwlding) for New Commeraal and Industrial Development 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans. I. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief Is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life or property b Flammable and combustible Ilgwd (storage, handling, and/or use) c Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing operation J. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations 1 The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions require that the San Bernardrno County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance They are the CUPA for the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 3 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated 4 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pestiades, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount 5 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount 6 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 7 Any business subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement, however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory submission rather than a certification K~3 Pim Datnc[ Condttlons- Incompleteness Comments Page 5 of 5 statement each March 1. Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory r 8 Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR If the faality is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fue Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be requred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Dmsion at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance 10 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner 11 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs K. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, M and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision K~~} T H E C I T Y A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE. January 23, 2002 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Kirt A Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT PRELIMINARY REVIEW DRC2002-00014 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT - A courtesy review of General Plan consistency of the proposed site acquisition of approximately 18 2 acres of land for an elementary school in the Estate Residential District (up to 1 dwelling unit per acre), located on the north side of Banyan Street, west of East Avenue - APN 225-122-39, 40, 85 and 86 ABSTRACT Under State law, the Office of the State Architect has authority to review and approve new school facilities In order "to promote the safety of pupils and comprehensive community planning," the school district is required to receive a report from the Planning Commission before acquiring title to property for a new school site The Planning Commission is required to investigate the proposed site and detail its recommendations concerning acquisition of the site in writing SITE DESCRIPTION A Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant, Estate Residential (up tot dwelling unit per acre) South - Single-Family Homes, Very Low Residential (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Citrus grove and single-family homes, existing Summit Intermediate School on the opposite side of East Avenue, Estate Residential (up tot dwelling unit per acre) West - Single-Family Homes, Estate Residential (up tot dwelling unit per acre) B. General Plan Designations Protect Site -Estate Residential (up tot dwelling unit per acre) North - Estate Residential (1 dwelling unit per acre) South - Very Low Residential (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Estate Residential (up tot dwelling unit per acre), Schools (Junior High School) on the opposite side of East Avenue West - Estate Residential (up tot dwelling unit per acre) C Site Characteristics The 18-acre site is currently developed with one house at the southwest comer, and the remaining portions are vacant with native trees and grasses present There are Eucalyptus windrows throughout the site (Exhibit "D") Grading and development of the site would remove the trees As mitigation, windrow replacement would normally be required ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00014 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 23, 2002 Page 2 by the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance A public Community Trail is planned along the west property Ime per the City's General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan D Potential Histonc Structure. The existing "cabin style" residence at 13108 Banyan Street (Exhibit "D")was built m 1921 by Allen Hickcox, who is related to Clark Albert Hickcox, one of the pioneenng fanners in the EUwanda area The structure is listed on the Citys histonc survey as "Undetertmned Significance" which means that no analysis has been performed or presented to the Histonc Preservation Commission for consideration, therefore, a cultural and histonc resources survey should be prepared PROJECT DESCRIPTION The EUwanda School Distnct is proposing to acgwre an approximatei~ 18-acre site of land for an elementary school in the Estate Residential Distnct located on the north side of Banyan Street, west of East Avenue The protect proposes eight classrooms, media, administration and multi-purpose buildings, and a kindergarten budding In addition, the school site outdoor recreation amenities are a hard court play area, an open play field, and a volleyball court. Access to the site is provided from Banyan Street and East Avenue Mam access, parking and loading and unloading of school children is from Banyan Street. The project proposes a generous building setback from Banyan Street of approximately 155 feet to the nearest classroom and administration budding. ANALYSIS. A. Land Use The proposed school site is consistent with the General Plan policy to promote development of residential "infill" lots, and the policy that "educational, cultural, and recreational uses should be placed m close proximity to their potential users and should be clustered together wherever possible " The proposed site is an "mfill" lot surrounded by residential development and across the street from Summit Intermediate School and EUwanda Creek Park (Exhibit "B") At present, there are no elementary schools v~nthin the area bounded by Etiwanda Avenue, I-15 Freeway, Route 30 Freeway, and Wilson Avenue, therefore, the proposed location would reduce vehicle tnps, particularly the length of said tnps The nearest elementary school, the recently opened John L Golden School, is located 1-mile to the west Further, the surrounding Estate Residential density regwres minimum 1-acre lots, which provides buffenng B Traffic The City Traffic Engineer requests a focused traffic study to determine if the proposed site is swtable for a school use and, if so, to detertrnne appropnate off-site and frontage improvements Surrounding land uses and existing traffic patterns are not conducive to increasing traffic m this location Banyan Street is designated as a collectorstreet, however, is currently only improved to local residential street standards Further, lack of improvements (i a ,sidewalk) on the north side of Banyan Street leaves no place for children to cross this busy street In conclusion, the Traffic Engineer recommends that a school should not open at this site until such time as a parallel route for through traffic exists, such as the completion of Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road C Investigation The proposed site acquisition does not regwre Design Review Committee or Technical Review Committee review, however, staff investigated the site acgwsition. The following comments are offered for the Planning Commission's consideration• Prepare a focused traffic stud1y a-~s part of the environmental review for this project I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00014 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 23, 2002 Page 3 2 Provide a Master Plan for the adjacent and surrounding "vacanUundeveloped"properties at the northwest comer of Banyan Avenue and East Avenue, and the properties on the south side of 23rd Street The purpose of the Master Plan is to demonstrate that the logical development can occur, including, but not limited to arculation and drainage 3 Provide a Master Plan for the northerly portion of the site acgwsition labeled "Future Distnct Development." Staff would be concerned with use of said land for Summit Intermediate School regarding safety of pedestnans crossing East Avenue Removal of Eucalyptus 'Blue Gum' windrows should be replaced with Eucalyptus 'Spotted Gum' windrows along the 330-foot by 660-foot gnd per the regwrements of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 5 Dedicate a 20-foot public CommunityTrail along the entire western protect boundaryas identified and required by the General Plan and Etiwanda Speafic Plan This would align with a Community Trail within approved Tentative Tract 16113 to the north 6 Provide a survey prepared by a qualified archaeologisUhistoncal consultant for the existing home located at 13108 Banyan Avenue (APN 225-122-39) for review by the City's Histonc Preservation Commission as part of the environmental review 7 Street frontages should be improved consistent with the Etiwanda Speafic Plan East Avenue is designated as a "Special Boulevard" within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan The "Special Boulevard" designation requires a street side setback of 20 percent of depth of lot, need not exceed 45 feet, nor be less than 25 feet as measured from the face of curb. Speaal landscape and design treatment shall be provided at locations identified with "Entry Theme" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan The entry theme at the northwest comer of Banyan Street and East Avenue All properties are located within a Flood Zone "D" therefore, the project must prepare a drainage study addressing flood protection as part of the environmental review process The master planned storm dram in East Avenue, between Banyan Street and Highland Avenue, and a local storm dram m Banyan Street, should be constructed with this protect to properly dispose of runoff School design, particularly architecture, should be sensitive to the gwdelines of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 10 The school distnct should coordinate street improvements and access locations with the City Traffic Engineer 11 A Development Review application including, but not limited to, Site Plans, Bwlding Elevations and Landscape Plans should be submitted to the City for a courtesy review • 11 Additional comments regarding public improvements are attached as Exhibit "G " L~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00014 - ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT January 23, 2002 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review and comment on the proposed site acgwsiUon, which staff will forward in venting to the Etiwanda School D~stnct for their consideration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB•KC.mlg Attachments• Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" -Topography Map Exhibit "C" - Etiwanda School Distnct Letter Exhibit "D" -Site Photos Exhibit "E" -Excerpts from "History of Etrvvanda" Exhibit "F" -Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan Exhibit "G" -Additional Comments - Re Public Improvements • u L'~ \\ 1 .\' 1 v`\ V V`t\ V' V ~t~~' ,1 ~~1 i ,t„ t o „A 1 A~ , i,t v ,,, „1' \, ~ t, ~t~,tt, t \ \I\1 \,\,\\~ 1 \1 t ti ; \ ~ \ t ,~\\t\\~\, tt"~~y`,.1i ;'t 1+t \\ ', ~ 1~ t+~••'i\~. ~ i+ \'t, ,\ +it ~t';, ~\, ~. O 1 \ \\\ •~\.'\' C~\`~ Jig ~ t~~\ 1' \,`\\~' .\~t ~ `~11~ \'i\, \t,t`'t\~ \~~ ~ ,1\+`<` t ,\\\\,`, .AA,~ .+ + ~ t ,,, , ,~ \ `+ \'\ ,`I 1\tl1 V , \t\,\`\ ~\`\\~`,u l\ n\` ~\\; tit `ti\ t••\\~• \1 ,1~ N J' 1 \\\\t\+'~, 11\\„1 \I\. \,tt~,t 1\ \`, \t\t 1, i v; J 1\,i t ~t 1 1 t ,t ~ 1 t t\,+ 1, t `~ \'\•~1 to t t \ '\\ .~; +\~~.\\\1 \ l,i ` \LI ~ \ ,,~, \, \\ ; 1`~t i\ \ 1 ,` \t1 t i:` ~`I,~\\ 11 ~rt' t 1 t ' \ •, ~ 1 t1\ ~\\ , \t `, \ 1 tt\,t 1\`~ \ ,. ~;~i'\.1,\ 1\1~t~\,\ ,t t; 1tt\.\,~ttt1 ~,t~, t 1, ~; t1 Q \ \\',+\It\, `\tlt \t `\\\t t \I, ,; ~. ` ,11, \I 1 1 t1 S ~ \ VA~ ~t V~ ~1~ ~„ A t' ~ ~ t 1 ,' \,~\~ \`\ 1, ,;1 `t\\ \~1\ ~,~ 11 tl ~ t tt 1,1 1P \ \1 \ ~ \ \\\'~ ~, V ,t 1 A',A ~ i,t '~tVA',. N, AV~1 ~~tA 't\~~,A 11• ~' [/~\J t AAVI t „1, 1 ~,'n+ ,A~ '\I ,1 1 t 'V ~,~A \ 1 ttt~,VAAVt '~\ {{~~{e~~~.~+,.;±.'.'}},~~~1•~-~•~~\ It, ,\\\\ \ ,,+ \\ \\1 tl\t,`t\~,\\\I t,t \1\\: \,.t+t, 1,• .t1„\t\. 1.\ti1 J IrRW~vvv~vtvI •1 v,1,,,, t„t v ~ 1 . „.~ . v„ ,v•t , ~ , t .V t, ":: "''a `,1" ~:,+ntt,\'}••' i•+\~r;'tt:VtitilL'.k~EA~9J.i~~"F~11-8C3'it\\1}.\\i ~~ A 1~ ~/~\ L~ ~z d 0 Q 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 N O u$-~ L (n John L Golden, Jr. SupenntenAant Rebecca M. Lawrence Assistant Supanntendent ~glas M. Claflin m~8tmtor for easiness $aMCaS wn Judson Atlmmistratur d Pamonnel HeIdI M. Soehnel Admlmstrator of Spagal Programs Board of Trustees Brynna R Cadman David W Long Mark H Murphy Cecilia Solono Monde M Taylor 1883 6061 East Avenue, Etiwanda, Calefomta 91739 (909) 899-2451 FAX (909) 899-9463 ~R( ~Z ~ ~~¢ December 21, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JAN 0 8 2002 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RECEIVED -PLANNING Attn: Brad Buller Re: Request to Render a Report as to the Conformity of the Etiwanda School Distnct Banyan Street potential Elementary School site with the General Plan of the Cety of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Members of the Planning Commission• The Etiwanda School District is interested in the school site on the north side of Banyan Street, east of Etiwanda Avenue and west of East Avenue. The size of the potential site is approximately 18.2 acres. Attached is a map of the site with a preliminary school plan represented As our initial discussion has indicated, the Destnct is welling to work cooperatively with the City in an effort to place this historical structure. Section 65402 (c) of the Government Code and Public Resources Code section 21151.2 provide that if a general plan has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired planning purposes until such acquisition has been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to the conformity with the adopted general plan. The Etiwanda School District hereby submets the request required by section 65402 (c) of the Califomea Government Code to the planning agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions Very truly yours, Superintendent ~A ~~. Mr. Mechael Toy, Parker & Covert LLP `~ JLG/fm L ~~~.~ John L. Golden Jr. r~ u V~ ~ -~ L 8 View of property looking north from Summa Avenue ~. '~ ; ~~ . ~Y~ .r, y, ~c .t~ `z ~, _. L9 ., View of property looking south from 23rd Street View of property looking west from East Avenue Llo • /~J/o8 ~ f ~~N1 c~-'~rt 1 1 1 1 I A HISTORY OF ETIWANDA Compiled and Edited by Robert L. Hickcox Chairman, Historic Preservation Commission Published by City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department Cover Design I by Cheryl Hickcox Guyer 1981 Second edition published by the Etiwanda Historical Society 1995 • • ~' ~ " pia . HICKCOX FAMILY Clark Albert Nickcox, born February 28, 1850 and Martha Boynton Joiner, born April 25, 1853, were married in their home valley of Wyoming Valley, Wisconsin on March 2, 1873. Three days after their wedding, Clark departed with his team and wagon for Nebraska. Martha followed him by train in May and they settled on a piece of Land and homesteaded it. After eight years of many hardships that included living in a sod home, sickness and having a horse die, they moved to Kansas in 1880. After twelve years of battling the elements on a Kansas farm they decided to move to California as they had encouraging reports from Martha's sister, Mrs. John Morris who had left earlier for Ontario The family brought eight children with them. Clark Hickcox although in poor health was hired to operate the Wood and Safford Ranch in Section 27, north- east of Etiwanda, later known as the Canyon Springs Ranch. This ranch consisted of 145 acres of trees and vines and some 300 acres of undeveloped land owned by two Pasadena men who had been in a law suit with the Etiwanda Water Company over water rights in East Etiwanda Canyon. The family had five children between the ages of 7 and 14 when they arrived in 1892. These children plus a few others in the area was enough to open the 6rapeland School at the corner of Sainsevain and Summit Avenues. One of the first things Mr. Hickcox did was to buy Lots 9, 10 and 15, Block B, of Etiwanda Colony Lands on the north side of Summit Avenue, May 27, 1893 for $3,300.00. This was a very rocky acreage that over the next few years was cleared of stones and planted to vines by all the boys in the family. It was first planted to grapes then in 1911 it was planted to lemons by Neil, -85- Ll3 Ross and Frank Hickcox who had each purchased one Lot from their father. • In 1896 Mr. Hickcox was hired as Zanjero for the Etiwanda Water Company at $58.35 per month so he moved his family to the old Garcia Home, which had been purchased by O.I. Winstanley on February 1, 1886 from the Chaffeys. Mr. Hickcox told of water from the Canyons being so short in 1899 that each grower could only run one furrow at a time. That summer, July 21, 1899, a very hard earthquake struck along the ridge of the mountains and loosened the fault at the base of Cucamonga Peak. This greatly increased the flow in Day Creek, which has its origin at this fault high up in Day Canyon. In 1900 Mr. Hickcox bought 20 acres and a house at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Baseline Road and moved his family there. By this time two more boys and a girl had been born making a total of eleven children but three had moved from home by this time. He continued to farm his orange and lemon grove and ten acres of vines at this location until about 1908 when he moved the family to Claremont as the three youngest children were nearing Prep School age. Mr. and Mrs. Hickcox returned to Etiwanda during World War I as three of his sons had joined the services and there was not enough local help to take care of the Etiwanda property, much of the work he assumed at the age of sixty-five. He had regained his health in California and was quite vigorous. On March 2, 1923, Mr. and Mrs. Hickcox celebrated their 50th Wedding Anni- versary and were honored by a large reception held in their honor at the Eti- wanda Congregational Church. A poem written by Mrs. Hickcox was read to the group that described their lives in Kansas, Nebraska and California. -86- ~~7 q G ,• u n -_J Mr. Hickcox died the night of February 13, 1924 as he was out taking care of his irrigation water. Mrs. Hickcox continued to live in the Etiwanda . ~,; _ ~_ home, with her daughter Winifred, until her death in 1930. Mr. and Mrs. Hickcox are buried in the family plot in Bellevue Cemetary~in Ontario with several of their children. This cemetary was surveyed and managed for many years by Mrs. Hickcox's brother-in-law, Mr. John T. Morris, the father of Mrs. John Frost and Mrs. John Scott, Jr. of Etiwanda. -87- LlS /J ~.~a.~ ~~~nnnuunn nnn-mn •uu• •~•~ _ i ,-~ 0 Equestrian Trails r Bike Lane* or Bike Route* (On Pavement Shoulder) Bike Path (In Parkway) ,~ Foothill Boulevard `~~ Specific Plan • Consult Trail Implementetlon Plan ~ ~~~ II < II COMMUNITY ~ ~' Y TRAILS l ~ ~ l/ $ L/~ •e 5-18 REVISED 917/88 REVISED 411/92 SST AV WALL 4PE EAST AVENUE FIG. 5-28 L/7 CASCNICNT REVISED 8!7/88 REVISED 411192 ETIWANDA AVENUE North ot~ueanlit" FIG. 5-2 7 1 OO EAST AVENUE PARKWAY FIG 5-2 8A REVISED 9/7/88 s s • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECT PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS To, PLANNING DIVISION Kirt Protect No DRCPR2002-00014 Appllcant(s)• Etiwanda School District Type Elementary School 6061 East Avenue Locatnon• N/S Banyon, W/O East Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 APN• 225-122-39.40, 85, 86 Contact: John Golden Phone (909) 899-2451 P&E Meeting 01-15-02 By Mazk Brawthen ~ / -1 ~ ' ~ •~ Ckd• ~)ZGQO.~ I ~ o Z COMMENTS Engineering recommends that the School District meet with the Clty Traffic Engineer before deciding whether to use the subject site for an elementary school Surrounding land uses and existing traffic patterns on Banyan Street aze not conducive to adding dally school traffic m this location Banyan Is a designated collector street, but only constructed to local residential street standazds, per the Etiwanda Specific Plan A lack of unprovements on the north side of Banyan leaves no place for children to cross this busy street At a muimum, a focused traffic study should be done to detemune the appropriate off site and frontage unprovements needed We recommend that a school should not open at this site until such tune as a pazallel . route for through traffic has been provided, by completing Wilson Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to Wazdman-Bullock Road If, after due consideration, the School District decides to proceed against our recommendations, then the following conditions shall be Imposed 1 Banyan Street (formerly Summit Avenue) frontage Improvements shall be installed as follows a Widen existing pavement to 44 feet from East Avenue to the west protect boundary Since existing curb on the south side is 18 feet from the street centerline, 26 feet shall be provlded on the north side (approximately 14 additional feet) Provide transitions to existing pavement off site, both east and west b Dedicate additional right-of--way to provide a 12-foot pazkway behind the curb. c Install a raised median 3 feet wide along the entire protect frontage to restrict the proposed school driveways to right turns only, both in and out Provlde a median break and westbound left turn pocket for Ashton Place d Provlde a striping plan for Banyan Street from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue e Provide a walking path on the north side of Banyan Street from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue. ~\ ~~J Page 1 of 3 C Uvly Protecu~DRCPR2002-00014 doc L ~ 9 f Provide a sepazate nght tum only lane, 12 feet m width, for westbound traffic begmmng at East Avenue and ending at the protect entrance dnveway g. Stnping on Banyan Street shall be as follows one 17-foot lane for eastbound traffic, a 3-foot wide ratsed median island, one 12-foot through lane for westbound traffic and one 12-foot nght turn lane (total width 44 feet curb-to-curb) h. Provide curb, gutter, three (3) 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights, R26 (S) "No Stopping" signs, drive approaches per Standazd Drawing 101, type C (attached), street trees and sidewalk east of the Ashton Place trazl crossing. Dedicate 20 feet along the entire west project boundary for Community Trail purposes Install trail improvements per attached Standard Drawing 1004 a Maintenance vehicle access to the trail shall be provided per Std Dwg 1006-A b To avoid a mtd-block tratl crossing, provide a Pazkway Commtuuty Trail (Std. Dwg 1002-B) on the north side of Banyan from the west project boundary to Ashton Place (approximately 200 feet) Any dnve approach crossing the decomposed granite trail surface shall have a transverse medium broom finish. East Avenue frontage improvements shall be installed as follows a West half of East Avenue shall be fully improved, m accordance with City . "Secondary Artenal" standards and Figure 5-28 (attached) of the Ehwanda Specific Plan, for the entre length of the northerly pazcel (APN 225-122-85 & 86) This will include curb and gutter 32 feet west of the centerline, AC pavement, two (2) 9500 Lumen HPSV street fights, R26(S) "No Stopping" signs, a dnve approach per Standazd Drawing 101, type C, street trees, 5-foot property line adjacent sidewalk and East Avenue theme walls b Dedicate 44 feet, measured from the street centerline Since school bus traffic v~nll be using East Avenue, the west side shall be improved with 18 feet of AC pavement from the southerly srte boundary to Banyan Street If the School Distract is unable to obtazn the necessary off srte nght-of--way to accomplish this (APN 225-122-44), they may enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests d Provtde striping and stgnage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4 The existing overhead utthhes (telecommunications and electncal, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the protect side of Banyan Street shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage extending to the first pole off srte (east and west) of the project boundary, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs . first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the Crty adopted cost for undergroundmg from future development (redevelopment) as it Page 2 of 3 C ~fy Protects~DRCPR2002-00014 doc L~jV occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the Crty, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Provide a Master Plan for azeas surrounding the project, to include driveway access on adjacent properties to conform with City Driveway Policy, drainage patterns Include the area bounded by Banyan, East, 23`d, and Etiwanda Avenue 6. Increased runoff from the driveway to East Avenue and pazking azea on the northerly pazcel shall be duetted to a public street without impacting adjacent private property The site is located m Flood Zone "D", an azea of undetermined flood hazard School Distract should do a drainage study to detemune the need for flood protection measures at the north project boundary 8 Construct Area 5 Master Plan Storm Dram facilities m East Avenue, from then existing terminus north of Highland Avenue to Summit Avenue, to the satisfaction of the Crty Engineer Standazd draznage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facrlities and the developer shall be eligible for rermbursement of costs in excess of fees, m accordance with City policy If developer fails to submit for sazd reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public unprovements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate a Install a local storm dram in Banyan Street, as faz west of East Avenue as needed to contazn Q25 within tops of curbs (Q50 at sumps), Q100 with r rights-of--way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10. The cost of local storm drams shall be borne by development b Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Draznage Area is responsible for paying the City's adopted Regional and Secondary Regional drainage fees 9 Street improvement plans, prepazed by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Prior to any work being performed m public nghts- of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office Page 3 of 3 C \My Projects\DRCPR2002-00014 dot L~ I