HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/05/05 - Agenda Packetfl ........ I II I I LI I III III I IIIIII I III I IIIIIII IIIIII IIIIILIIIIIDIIIIII IIIIII IllII III II
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1 st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
I
May 5, 1999
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Councilmembers
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern
Paul Biane, Councilmember
James V. Curatato, Councilmember
Bob Dutton, Councibnember
Jack Lam., City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, Ci.ty Clerk
City Office: 477-2700
1
City Council Agenda
May 5, 1999
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
Roll Call:
A. CALL TO ORDER
Alexander Biane
Curatalo__, Dutton ........
and Williams
,,
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS~PRESENTAT!ONS
Presentation to Jerry Fulwood commending him for his years of
service to Rancho Cucamonga and congratulating him as he takes
on the challenges as the new City Manager in La Canada.
Presentation of a Proclamation proclaiming May 9 - 15, 1999, as
Senior Center Awareness Week.
Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May 10 - 16, 1999, as
Business Appreciation Week in Rancho Cucamonga.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general publ,ic to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a su;bsequsnt meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calend~ar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/14199 AND 4/21/99 and
Payroll ending 3/28/99, for the total amount of $1,329,599.40.
Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids"
for the replacement of drinking fountains with. ADA compliant units
at various city parks, to be funded from various maintenance
accounts.
17
City Council Agenda
May 5, 1999
RESOLUTION NO. 99..098
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLAN AND MAKING
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REPLACEMENT
OF DRINKING FOUNTAINS WITH ADA
COMPLIANT UNITS AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY, AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE ~O RECEIVE BIDS
Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids"
for the Local Street Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal - for various local
streets and parks trails, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-
9113 and Account No. 90-4130-7043.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-099
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANClHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE STREET
REHABILITATION SLURRY SEAL - FOR
VARIOUS LOCAL STREETS AND PARK TRAILS
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids"
for Window Cleaning Services to City facilities, to be funded from
01-4648-6036.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR: WINDOW CLEANING
SERVICES FOR CITY, AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
Approval of the Park and Recreation Commission
recommendations on the selection and recruitment process for
members of the Senior Advisory Committee.
18
22
23
27
28
33
City Council Agenda
May 5, 1999
10.
Approval to purchase an IBM S7A AIX Server to replace the IBM
RS/6000 Application Server from Pioneer Standard Electronics
through the State of California, Del~artment of General Services,
Procurement Division, 1999 Cor~tract 3-97-70-0430A, in the
amount of $317,660 from Acct. 74.-4225-7047, FY 98/99 budget.
Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security
and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 3b and Street Lighting Mainten,ante District Nos. 1 and 6 for
CUP 97-19, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Vineyard Avenue, submitted by American Stores Properties,
Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR CUP 97-19
RESOLUTION NO. 99-102
A RESOLUTION OF '['HE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 97-19
Approval to award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO
99-053) for the construction of FY 1998t99 ADA ramps on
Archibald Avenue from Base Line Road south to Sixth Street and
various locations, to the apparent low bidder, Perry Maness
Industries, for the amount of $129,626.75 ($117,842.50 plus 10%
contingency) to be funded from TDA Article 3, Account No. 16-
4637-9106, in the amount of $4,000.00; Proposition 111 Fund,
Account No. 10-4637-9804, in the amount of $80,000.00; and
Measure I - Local - Account No. 32-4637-9106 in the amount of
$45,626.75 (plus 10% contingency).
Approval to release the Maintenance Bond for DR 95-30, located
on Beryl, south of Hillside.
Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond held as a
Maintenance Bond for Tract 14116, located on the south side of
Highland Avenue, west of Deer Creek Channel.
35
36
38
39
42
45
46
City Council Agenda
May 5, 1999
4
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONI~ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ~)9-~1 - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - An application to Change the General Plan land
use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for
17.85 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and
Lemon Avenues. APN: 201-272-17 and 18.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIROiNI~,E ,N'I'AI~ ASSESSMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A!~E.HQ!~Ei~IT 99-01 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA An appfication to change the
Development District Zoning designation from Medium Residential
(8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium (4-8 dwelling units
per acre) Residential for 17.85 acres located at the northeast
corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues. APN: 201-272-17 and
18.
ORDINANCE NO. 600 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT 9.9-01, A PROPOSAL
TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4.8 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE) WITH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY,
FOR 17.85 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND
AND LEMON AVENUES, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-
272-17 AND 18
47
F. ADVERTISED PUB,LI(~ HEARliNGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOpMF~NT CODE AMENDMENT 99-
0...~1 A request to amend the regulations for wireless
communication facilities.
52
City Council Agenda
May 5, 1999
ORDINANCE NO. 601 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVliNG DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING
CHAPTER 17.26 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE,
REGARDING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAI~ ASSES~.iMENT AND
VICTORIA PLAN AMENDMENT 9~ ~ W. liI~LIAM LYON HOMES
- A request to amend ~he Victoria Community Plan to reduce the
Village Commercial land area from approximately 23 acres to 16
acres, and to redesignate approximately 16 acres of land from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on a project site
consisting of 62.3 acres of land located southwest of Highland
Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-021-03 and
13. Staff has prepared a Negative Declarati,on of environmental
impacts for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 602 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02,
AMENDING THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
TO REDUCE THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL
LAND AREA FROM APPROXIMATELY 23
ACRES OF 16 ACRES, AND TO REDESIGNATE
APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES OF LAND FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW -MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) ON A PROJECT SiTE CONSISTING OF
62.3 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED SOUTHWEST
OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND THE FUTURE
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-
021-03 AND 13
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLU!TION FOR THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL/~!t~.,~{~MENT$ WITHIN THE
PARK AND RECREATION !MPR~.V_~,I~NT DISTRICT (PD-85)
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/00. NO li~ cRE~E OF ASSESSMENT
RATE IS PROPOSED
78
81
158
161
City Council Agenda
May 5, 1999
RESOLUTION NO. 99-103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND
RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PD-
85 (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY
PARKS)
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF THE WITHIN
LANDSCAPE MAINTE~ 1.2~ 3A, 3B, 4.5.
6. 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YE~ 1!9~00. NO iNCREASE OF
ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE. C~TY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3A, 3B,
4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
1999/00 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF THE AN!NUP~L ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1.2.3, 4.
5.6.7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/00. NO INCREASE OF
ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED
RESOLUTION NO. (,)9-105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRACT NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7 AND 8 PURSUANTTO THE LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING TO BE
VACATED PORTIONS OF TWO AL~LEYS AND DISPOSITION OF
A PORTION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY. GENERALLY
WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSAAVENUE.
SUBMITTED BY NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY (V-161)
163
164
167
168
170
171
City Council Agenda
May 5, 1999
RESOLUTION NO. 99-106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED
THOSE PORTIONS OF CITY STREETS
(ALLEYS) GENERALLY WITHIN THE
NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST
OF HERMOSA AVENUE
RESOLUTION NO. 99-107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO iBE SURPLUS AND A
BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF
WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETOAS EXHIBIT"D"
TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO
THE PERSON NAMED THEREIN
173
177
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following
requirements.
testimony.
items have no legaJ publication or posting
The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S $TA~FF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
City Council Agenda
May 5, 1999
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting= for public input.
No Items Submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council, State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
UPDATE BY LEONARD PAULITZ ON AIR QUALITY In SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY (Oral)
REQUEST FROM TONI RHODES TO ADDRESS BUSINESS
APPRECIATION NIGHT AT THE EPICENTER (Oral)
L, ADJOURNMENT
MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS
PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMilENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT ROCHIESTER, BETWEEN
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; JACK LAM, CITY
MANAGER, AND KEVIN MCARDLE, COMiM~UNITY SERVICES
DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTIES, R!EG~RDING TERMS OF
PAYMENT.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda
was posted on May 5, 1999, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting
per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 04-1~-99 C98/993
RUN DATE: 06/I4,/99 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRIPTION HAIR NO WARR. A~T.
00 CHECKE OVERLAP
3663 R L T SPECIALTY, INC. D.A.R.E. SUPPLIES 134,7520 73.4,4,-
¢¢¢ 134753- 1374,61
3063 CITY CLERKS ASSOCTATION OF CALIFo CITY CLERK°S ANNUAL CONF. 1374620 570°00-
~¢¢ 137463- 137571 )))
I1357 RADISSO# HOTEL CONFERENCE, HOTEL RESERVATIONS 1375720 IT4.00-
~~~ 137573 - 138204
31173 LENZJAN, SHARON RECREATZON 1382050 52.00-
(~( 1382O6- 136298
2737 U C REGENTS POCKET GUIDE 1382990 450.00
6167 CAFE CALATO RETIRE#ENT DENHER ~38~0~
((~ 136301- ~38302
· 635 A G K PHOTO~R&PHY P~CT~ OEV~LOPZNG L SUPPLIES 136~3 17.71
lO A L ~ TIRE SEnVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE J 138305
I A A EQUIPMENT ~ENT~S CO.,INC. VEHZCL~ HAZNTENANCE/SUPPLZES J 138~6 S60.76
211 A O T SECURITY SERVICES, INC. ~ SERVICE 138~T
1098 A G ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL ~ERV~CES 138~8 785040
21189 &OAM~o BArBArA ~CREAT~ R~UNO 138~Z 30.00
2A~73 ALAV~o AkA RECREATION REFuNO 138314 52.00
21181 ALLAN, GLAOYS RECREATZON REFUND 138315 IS.00
21181 ALLA~D, CINDY RECrEATiON REFUNO 138316 65.00
1430 ANE~ZCA~ BUSINESS FORHS OFFICE SUPPLIES d 138319
6052 AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT ADVERTZSXNG FEE 138320 1~440.00
2693 ARTECH E~EVATOR SERVICES HONTHLY SERVICE g ~38322 70~.20
2096~ AMDER$~o DON J. RELEASE OF CASH 80NO 138323 1,S05.00
2i178 ASH~ORTH, JOYCE RECREATION REFUND 138326 ~5.00
4OZ AUTO RESTORATORS VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE 138327 928.26
1135 AUTO SPECIALISTS VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE t A38328 425.68
· 102 8 ~ K ELECTRIC UHQLESALE MAINTENANCE S~PLZES J 138329 2,184.~2
211T7 8 Z A REGISTRATION 138]30 3S.00
47 BELL L H0~ELL PROFESSIONAL ~ERVZCE 138332
4441 BEST BUY CO., INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES d 136333 900.00
41 BISHOP COHP~NT HAZNTENA~E S~PLZES e 138334 1o049.95
12&7 8LATE PAPER CO-, Z~- RECREATION SUPPLIES i 138335 77.83
S7~ BULLERe 6~AO CASH ADVANCE 138337 ~60.00
ZlA86 OYARSo LYNNE RECREATION ~EPUNO 130339 4S.00
ZI~6S BYRD, AMORA ~ECREATZON REFUND ~JO)~O IS.00
!6.0 C A P C A MEMBERSHIP DUES 138341 75.00
5361 CAL COVE~ PRODUCTS RECREATION SUPPLIES 138~Z IS.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LEST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: ~6-14-99 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 04/14/99 PAGE~ 2
VENOOR NAME ITEM OESCRIPTZON ~ARR NO WA;Ro APlT.
~ CHECK! OVERLAP
**11 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 138343
61 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION 130344 39095
gl184 CA#ARENAt TAeI RECREATION REFUND I38345 37050
488 CHEVRON U S At INC GASOLINE CHARGES 138366 58.66
~18 CHZNO HELLS TRANSMZSSXON VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 13834,7 182.15
21160 CHRISTOPHER, JUDY RECREATION REFUND 138~8 65000
73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES a 138~9 498087
5759 COLEMAN, DAN CASH AOVA~CE 138350 210.00
~301 CO#PUSA, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 138351 291035
643 CONPUTERLANO COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES J 131352 561084
*)O? CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. EQUIPMENT 130353 339037
2ZJBZ COOPERe KARXN RECP~ATZON REFUNO 138354 40.00
85 CUCA#ONGA CO MATER DZST ~NTHLY MATER BILLINGS ~ 138355
ZlXa8 CUNHZNGSe FRANK RECREATION REFUND 138356 ]0.00
4281 O 7 CONSULTING INC. MAINTENANCE REPAiRS/SUPPLIES 4 138357
Z~& D~XST ~EEL ~Z~ON CO~ XNC OFFICE ~UPPLZES 138358
6~(5 DAV~So SAM CONTRACT SERVICES 1383S9 283.S0
5JZ~ DE vO~T. SCOTT ~. P~S~:~ S~VZCE~ ~ ~0
AOF O~TCO ~F~GE S~LI~S ~8~Z 566.77
36612 DILL, ~E~Z R[CREATZON REFUND 138~5 19.00
36~89 OOUCETTE~ ~HONDA REC~EATI~ REFUN~ 138366 48000
S~2~ EXPE~Z~N P~OFESSZONAL SERVICES 138369 50.00
4817 FATLAND, SANDRA REZHBURSENENT 138370 113.06
]6039 FIERZ0 BRENDA RECREATION REFUND 138371 17.00
3088 FIRST STOP MOTORSPO~TS~ INC. VEHICLE ~ZNTENANCE 4 138~Y2 150000
366*0 FONTANES. SANORA RECREATION REFUND ~38373 13.00
535~ FOOTHILL AUTO BODY OEPOSZT RGFUND t~137, ~tOO0.00
6!89 FRAME GALLERY OFFICE SUPPLIES 138376 388.00
36645 GAOAbOUT TOURS INC. ~GCREATZON f 138377
366*Z G~LBERTo SUSAN RECREATION R~FUNO ~38378
3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBORZSTS, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1~8379
S955 GOLDEN ~EST DZSTRZ~T~ RECREATION SUPPLIES 138380
366*2 GOHEZ~ ELZSA L RECREATION REFUND 138~1 30.00
~BTO GOR~Z~ ~ZCK REIMBURSEMENT 138~2 160.00
36643 GONZ~LEZ~ NELZNDA RECREATION REFUND 138383 200.00
CCC 138385 - 138~S
137 GTE CALIFORNIA ~NTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS e 138~6
48*6 HAAS DICTATING $YSTEHS MAXNTENAKE SUPPLIES 138~7 86.19
2855 HAVEN ~ZNE g L~GUOR CO. SUB-CONRZTTEE ME~TZNGS ~ 138388 3Z6.99
]139~ HILLSIDE COVE ASSOCIATES RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 13~389 ~,650.00
~X~O5 HOGANf HARGARET RECREATION ~38390 IS.OO
4033 HOME DEPOT CREO~T SERVICE MAINTENANCE S~PLZES e 136~2 1,766.03
1~34 HOSENAN MAINTENANCE S~PLZES 138393 ~.91
{
i
i
I
l
4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LZST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERZOO= 04-14-99 (98/99)
~UN DATE: 04/t4/99 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NANE ZTEN DESCRXPTXON WARR NO UARR. ANT0
4nC~ CHECKB OVERLAP
J6Z HOYT LUNBER COo, $.H. HAZNTENANCE $UPPLZES d 138394 694076
t6? X C B 0 HAXNTEkANCE SUPPLZES 139~t15 105.00
103 Z C H A RETZRENENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED CaMP 130396 677.00
4154 ZBH CORPORATZON NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES i 1393~7 29062.14
568Z ZCRA RETZRE#ENT TRUST - 401 O! e 139398 6,018.36
46 ZNOUSTRZAL ASPHALT NAXNTE#ANCE SUPPLZES i 138~9t 370.26
5519 ZNFORNATXON TECHNOLOGY GROUP HAXNTEN&NCE 138'00 1,700.00
3139Z ZNLANO EHPXRE 9USZN~S$ JOURNAL $UI$CRXPTZON 1)6'0Z Z4oO0
Zt290 XNLAND Z#PXRE PRAYER BREAKFAST PRAYER BREAKFAST 138402 15.00
· 06 ZNLAND HEDZATZON BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DZSPUTE RESOL. J 136~3 1,724.~2
6~Z JAESCHKE ZNC.$ C.R. VEHICLE ~ZNTENANCE
3136~ JAGUSCH, OOROTHT RECREATZON t38~7 30.00
86 ~A voz AOVERTZSZ~ 138~12 3~0.00
31~83 LA~KFORD, BETTY RECREATZON 138416 15.00
~1379 L~E, J~ RECREATZON 138417 40.00
979 ~E~S ~NE~ REFUND OF DEVELOPHENT FEES 138~18 6.50
I*S~ LONG'S DRUGS FZLH HOCE$SZ~ f 138420 64.53
5662 LOS ANGELES COCA C~A BTL. CO. KEC~EATZON SUPPLIES 138~1 399.50
3138( LOTZCHw LAVEffENE ~ECREAT/ON 138~2 15.00
31393 LUDOLPH~ DEBRA RECREATZON 138~3 48.00
31376 L~KO~SKZ~ TED RECREATZGN ~e*~4 ~.OO
31364 LTLE, PITRZCKA RECREATZON 139425 15000
· ~91 ~ N A S C NE~BERSHZP 1~8~6 SO.00
4000 H $ A HENBERSHXP
549 n~RXPOSA HORTXCULTURAL ENT.XNC. LA~SCAPE HAXNTENANCE f 138428 ZZ,SZ6.01
72 HARK CH~ZS, ZNC. VEHXCLE ~XNTENANCE SUPPLZES t38419 26.24
4117 HARSfiA~ PLUHBXNG REHAB. PROGRAH d 138430 977.19
31381 HARTZN, GLBDV$ RECREATZON 138,31 13.00
31161 NC EL[~V, FERN RECREATXON 136433 33.00
2198 NXCHAELS STORES ZNC. 03019 RECREATZON $UPPLXES 138434 161.26
749 ~ZJAC ALAff~ CO~PANY ALARH SERVZCES ~38435 390.00
3&60 NOBZLE HXNX, Z~. STGRAGE SUPPLXES J 138~36 39Z.ZZ
4374 NOBZLE STORAGE GROUPw ZNC. EQUXPNENT RENTAL 138437 140.13
31~90 NO~GANe GLO~XA RECREATXON 13~38 30.00
10ZO NOUNTAXN VZE~ GLASS ~ ~XRROR MAZNTENANCE $UPPLZES $ 138439 88.58
CCC 1~8~.0 - 138~0
2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHXCLE HAZNTENA~CE ! 138~1 1eS40.24
744 NATZONAL OEFERREO DEFERRED CORP 138441 20153.00
31~7~ NXCOLiZSEN & SONS CONST. ZNC RELEASE OF DEPOSXT 138~3 SO0.00
31380 MOETN~ OZANNA RECREATZON 138~4 25.00
CCC 136445 - 138~S
i
I
I
1
I
1
t
i
1
I
t
1
1
I
t
i
I
i
1
CZTY OF RANCHO CUCA#ONGA
LZST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERZOO: 0.-1¢-99
RUN DATE: 04/1,/99 PAGE: 4
V[NOOR NAME ZT~H DESCRiPTiON WARN NO WARN. AHTo
OVERLAP
513 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES J 138446
235 OdEN ELECTriC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1384,48
2922 P · P A PESTICIDE APPLICATORS SEMINAR 138449
J953 PACZFZC COAST AIR TOOL #AZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 138450
818 PARAGON BUiLDiNG PRODUCTS iNC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES 138452
31388 PARRiLL·, ROSA RECREATION 138454
b148 PIN,N, SH&UN BENS REGUI. ATZON$ WORKSHOP 138456
4554 PZTKSSI, P[TE~ J. ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT 13B4S7
6089 PITTS, LISA RECREATION REFUND 13R435
255 PO#A DXSTqXBUTZNG CO VEH/CLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLXES 138439
30971 POTTER, N£LI$$A #ILEAGE REZ#BURSENENT 158460
5600 PRZH· #GMBERSH~P OUTS 138462
583 PeOTECTZO# SERVICE INDUSTRIES PROTECTION SERVICES-LiONS CNTR e 138464
63 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY ~AXNTE#A~E SUPPLIES e 1384,65
31373 QUZROZo TON! RECREATION 138467
Co( I38468 - 1~8468
251 n L R AUTOSOTZVE VEH!CLE #AINT,$UPPLZE$~SERVZC~ # 136469
3663 R L T SPECIALTY, INC. O.AoR.E. SUPPLIES ~38470
4451 R C QUAKES PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL TGIF #INX PLAN 138471
80 RAINBOW PHOTO LAB PHOTO SUPPLIES 138471
264 RALPHS GROCERY CO#PANT ~ECREATION SUPPLIES 138473
2600 RANCHO CUCANONGA FiRE OXSTRICT SALARY AND $ENEFZTS · 1~8474
5618 R]CHARDS, HATSONe ~ GERSHON LEGAL SERVICES e 138475
276 RZVERSZOE BLUEPRINT PRINTS e 138476
11391 R3D~NA, JUANIT· RECREATION REFUNDS 138477
SBZ& ROGAN BUILDING SERVICES JAnITOriAL SERVICE · 138478
11392 ROGERS, NOkZCA RECREATXON REFUNDS 138479
300 SAN 6ERN COUNTY REZ#B PARKING CiTATiONS 8 1384~1
5019 SAN BERN COUNTY FiRE DEPTo UNDERGROUND TANKS ~38482
1~Z SAN 01~00 ROTARY BROOM CO, INC NAINT SUPPLIES I 138483
IX39& $CHNOEBELEN, LAURIE RECREATION REFUNDS 138485
1105 SEAL FURNITURE L SYSTEHS INC. OFFZC~ SUPPLIES 138486
11395 SEGURA, HARXA RECREATION REFUNDS 138487
1829 SNARED TECH. FAiRCHiLD TELECOM, INC T~LEPNONE SERVICES e 138488
&750 SHIVA CORPORATION CONPUTER SUPPLIES 138489
352 SIGN SHOP, THE HAZNT SUPPLIES 138490
~327 SMART L FX#AL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES e 138492
317 $0 ¢ALXF EOZ$ON CO. HONTHLY E~ECTRZC BILLINGS 13849)
Z431 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOZ$ON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS I 138498
4176 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL 138499
)))
10637.62
1.00
lo702.16
27,,00
53.36
834.45
64.65
50.00
30000
29.00
146o00
174o00
121,444.91
45066
29.00
295..00
SOS..00
&ZO .01
36.00
73.44
1,150o00
13o09
65.91
60440oS5
833.00
46042
65.00
~2,456o64
30.00
2,461.00
3,160.00
1!.69
STSo39
70.00
19o00
lO.T8
ZOO.00
73o87
62.50
39.87
lBS.Q6
466.68
866,40
70850.57
302.26
t
J
i
I
J
i
I
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHDNGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 0&-1~-99 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 04/IA/99 PAGE: S
VENDOR NAme ZTEN DESCRiPTiON UARR NO
Do CHECK# OVERLAP
~1396 STAUSACH RETAIL PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUNO 138S00
36]2 STEELdORRERS OLOTZMERS FOUNDATIO# OLOTZ#ERS FOUNDATION iSIS01 576.43
S281 STORZCYCLE, ZNC. SHARPS P~OGRAH ~38SOZ 52.9~
6X3~ SUPER PC HEHORY PUSLXCATXON J ~38503 2,642.78
336 SURVEYORS SErViCE HAZNTE~A~E SUPPLIES t 138~ 28.3~
23~ TARGET YOUTH PROGRAH & DAY CAMP SUPPL 138S06 49.S~
6159 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONSULTING GRP 8USZNES~ LZCENSE REFUNO Z38~8 ~,500.00
39~2 TERNZNZX ZNTERNATZ~AL P HOhTHLY PEST CONTRO~ SERV2~E ~38~9 58.00
,738 T~ZSZTY ENTERPRISES SUPPLIES f 138511 13SOS8
~873 TROPHY CENYE~ OF ALTA LOHA RECREATZ~ SUPFLZES I 13851~ 323.25
113~7 TROTTER, AC~ZANNE RECREATION REFUNDS 138513 65.00
.577 UELLS FARG~ GuABD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES 13852] ltZOS.TT
01~1 UEST E~ HATEfrilL ~PPLY RECREATION REFUND 138525
6099 ~ZT&KER, ~ZCHARD L~G~SLATZVE TIZP TO SACTO t ~38526 300.00
~.00 NZLL~ZOGE, e~E~N RECREATION REFUNDS 1385Z7 15.00
11287 UOUO OF LZF~ MiNiSTrY ~ECREATZON REFUNOS 138529 200.00
!l~01 N~IG~T, JULZETTE RECrEATiON REFUNDS 138530 11~.00
II*OZ HYMN, LA~RZ RECREATION REFUNDS 138531 S5.00
509 X~ROX CORPORATION COPY H~CfiZNE SUPPLIES/SERVICE m 13dS3Z 1,995.~5
371 ZEE NEDZEAL SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES 138533 86.36
TOTAL
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA#ONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 04-21-99 (98/99)
RUN DATE: 04/21/99 PAGE: 1
VENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARN. ANT.
~ CHECKe OVERLAP
4457 PRINT TECH ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 135034~
((( 135035 - 136932 )))
CASH ADVANCE 136933~
((( 136934 - 138425
MENBERSHIP 138426
((¢ 138427 - 138533
C&LIF LIBRARY ASSOC NTG. 138534~
(¢( 138535 - 138536
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 158537
VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE/SUPPLIES 138538
P.~ZNTEI~ANCE SUPPLXES # 138539
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 1385.40
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
RECREATION SUPPLIES # 1385,,2
HONE OCCUPATION PERMIT REFUND I
((( 138545 - 138~5
CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS e 138~6
GYfi RENTAL-V~NEYARO JR H~H 138548
~SZNESS LICENSE REFU~
NAZNTENANCE S~PLZES 138550
~NTHLY SERVICE 138551
PROFESSIONAL SERVZCES 138 553
RECREATION REFUNO ~38 554
VZSA MONTHLY BZLLZNGS e 138555
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 138556
RECREATION REFUND ~38 SS7
HAZNTENA~E SUPPLIES I 138558
8US~NESS LICENSE REFU~ 138559
LZIBARY SUPPLIES I 138560
RECREATZON REFUNO 138~2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 138563
~AZMTENA~E $~PLZES 138564
LIBRARY SUPPLIES 138~5
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 138566
MEDICAL PREMIUM 138~7
LIBRARY SUPPLIES ~ 138568
FILTERS ~38~9
RECREATION REFUND
LIBRARY SUPPLIES e 138571
CONSULTANT SERVZCES 138~2
RECREATION REFUND 138573
RECREATION REFUND 13857~
REGiSTraTiON 138~5
BUSINESS L~CENSE REFUNO 138576
OFFiCE/MA~MTENANCE EGU~PMENT ~ 138577
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 138578
RECREATION REFUND 138~9
576 BULLER, BRAD 162.50-
S164 CLA 73.00
21192 11530 SIXTH ST0 LoLoC. 10000
I A A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.,INC,, 52.08
2732 ABC LOCtL SNZTH S 129.60
7 ABLETRONXC S 95.74
21195 ABTS SECURITY COMPANY 25.20
3785 ACTION ART 690.94
6154 ADVANTAGE LEARNING SYSTE#S, TI~C. 95.95
1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Z.755.32
2603 ALL THE KI!~S PLAGS 322.,83
3265 ALTA LONA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,520.00
21196 ALTA RANCHO PET &
21199 A~AZON.COH B~LLZNG DEPT. 20t.95
2693 ARTECH ELEVATOR SERVZCES 261.00
Z& ARBOR ~RSERY INC. 521.51
5807 ARCH~TE~RA DESIGN GROUP 1~337.50
21201 ARNOULTe S~GRZD
667 ARRO~HEAD CREOZT UNION
21193 AUTO XTRAS 6.00
21g02 AZAH. ~AZSTA ~8-&O
· 102 B g R ~ECTRZC ~HOLESALE 2~815.95
21197 BAROON ENTERPRISES
&.75 BARNES E NOBLE 9~2.39
· *,1 BEST BUT CO.~ INC.
~407 BETTER ENERG~ IDEAS ~e722.26
6180 B~CKETT CONSTR~T~CN~ GLYNN
61~2 BILINGUAL PUBLICATIONS CO., THE 76085
,1 BISHOP COMPANY
~61 BLUE SHIELD/CARE AMERICA 32e017.85
4833 BOOKS ~ TAPE, XNC. xO.Te
5362 BOTTLE-FREE ~ATER CORPANY~
21204 BOURLA~ s PATRICia 75.00
4369 BRODART BOOKS
53&1 BUCKNAN & ASSOCIATES
21205 8UOKAo DARLENE 55.00
21206 BURNES ~ REBECCA
5713 C P R S AGING SECTION
21191 CALXFORNZA TRANSHI SSXON 139093
1223 CALSENSE 8~918066
3123 CARDKEY SY STEMS~
21207 CENTER OF HOPE CHU~H 100.00
4491 N N A S C 50.00-
CITY OF RANC~ CUCAMONGA
LIST ~ WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 04-21-99 (98/99)
RUN OATE: 04./21/99 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARM NO #ARM. ANT.
68
21194.
914
,f;349
4641
4211
21200
4301
64.3
21198
6130
~,370
85
239
614.5
5534
4544
4544
36646
3364
5030
2422
5?67
6190
ZZ9
k291
36651
5917
4.817
366~?
5918
36652
2840
1082
6191
3664.8
6074
352
5157
3664.9
3388
36650
137
137
4.62
31408
158
31395
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE
CHINATOWN HOUSE
CLAREMONT CAMERA & VIOEOw INC.
CLARK w DEBORAH
CMO SYSTEMSo INC.
COAST RECREATIVe INC.
COLES, MAR
COMPUSAo INC.
COMPUTERLANO
¢O#PUTER$ FOR TRACTSB 2NC.
CONTRACT COH~ERC2AL PROOUCTS
CORHZN, dA~ES A.
CUCAMONGA CO MATER OIST
D & K CO'METE CO
DAVISa SAM
O~AL COH#UIvICA TZON S
OIC~, ERIC
~C~ E~ ~C
O~XON~ ~EN
EZGHT~ AVENUE GRAPHICS
EL NATZVO GROWERSt
ELECTRON ZC S ~&REMOUS E
ELITE ~RSONNEL SERVZCES~ INC.
ELMO OATA SUPPLYt
ENZ~ IRRIGATION P~DUCTS
FANZLZAN PIPE L SU~LY
FAR&Mr
FASTEN~ COMPANY
FATL&NOe SANDRA
FLO~ SYSTEHS~ INC.
FLORENCE FILTER CORPORATION
FOLLZOTT w MARSHA
FORD OF UPLANO~
FRANKLIN COVEY CO~
FRZENOLY COMPUT~R
FU MAZ LIMITED PAR~ERSH2P
FUEUSH2MA~ JUOZTH
GENE'S ALL COLOR PAINT
GEO~AL ZNTERNATZON~
GLASSe ALZCZA
GOLDEN 8EAR ARBORISTSe INC.
GTE
GTE CALIFONN~A
HAP~ZDO~ LEE'S
KS-CU~Ee STEEL
HZLLCREST CONTRACTZNG~ TNC.
HOCKEY ~ESl
HOLL2DAY ROC~ CO.~ ZNC.
HOLZBERGER~ L~SA
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO
SUPPLIES/SER¥1CES
T~AVEL EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE & REPAIR
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
NILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
~ONT#LY WATER BILLINGS
CONTRACT SERVICES
PE~ESSI~L SERVICES
E#PLO~EE OF TNe NONT~
RECREAT!O# REFUND
OFFICE SUPPLIES
~ZNTENANCE S~PL~ES
ELECTRONIC SUPPLieS
OFFICE SUlLiES
ZRRZGAY~ON SUPPLIES
MAZNTENA~E SUPPLIES
OEPOS~T REFUNO
MAZNTENA~E SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
~USZNESS LICENSE REFU~
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
REXNBURSEHENT
~EH~CLE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PROFESSZONAL SERVICES
OVERPAYHENT OF FEES
P~OF~SSZONAL SERVICES
HA~NTEtAKE SUPPLIES
SUPeLIES L SERVICE
RECREATION REFUND
P~OFESSZONAL SERVICES
RECREATION REFUNO
MONTHLT TELEPHONE BILLINGS
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS
aUSZNESS L~CENSE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
BUSINESS LICENSE
RECREATION
MA~NTENA~E SUPPLIES
RECREATION
OVERLAP
138580 3,059000
138581 81.00
138582 36o21
138583 106.01
138584 396.98
138585 211.9~
138~86 60.00
138587 203°65
138~88 381.44
138589 I0000
138~90 28029o91
138591 22o01
- 138594
· 138595 6,578035
138597 564.00
# 138S98
· 138599 75.00
138601 39000
~ 138602 406.95
138603 179030
# 1386O4 55089
138605 59.94
138606 27&.69
138607 136.21
138608 176.09
138609 200.00
# 138610 476003
138611 38°60
138611 i3.50
138613
138614 43.82
~ 138615 918.40
138616 37.88
138617
138618 100oO0
138619 10230.00
138620 ~So34
# 138621 305.00
138622 4.7.50
~ 138623
138624 65000
# 138625 8~347.77
138616 105000
138627 8.86
# 138628 4.36.69
138629 24.2090
138630 75090
# 138631 10655081
138632 70.00
t
!
.!_
!
I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD; 04-21-99 (98/99)
RUN DATEZ 0&/11/97 PAGE; 3
vENOOR NAME XTEN DESCRIPTION ~ARR NO VARRo AHT.
~O CHECK* OVERLAP
,882 HOPKINS, LDRZ NILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 138633 26093
1234 NOSEHAM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 138634 496.93
363* HOUSE OF RUTH 93/9* COBG CONTRACT 138635 613000
161 HOYT LUHBER CO., S.N. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 138636 **9.67
5126 HUMAN KINETICS PUBLICATIONS 136637 77.02
1942 HYDRO TEK SYSTEHS, INC. EQUZP#ENT MAINTENANCE 138638 103.40
31409 INDUSTRIAL SALVAGE CORPORATION BUSINESS LICENSE 138639
31410 INGALLS POWER PRODUCTS BUSINESS LICENSE 138640 11.25
31418 INLAND E#P/RE MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION 1386~1 IZ.00
1952 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTDo TRANSPORTATION SERVZ£ES ~ 138642 Z,S9Do50
3867 INLAND LAYNMOWER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 138643 12070
31,17 ZNLAND ROCK BUSINESS LICENSE 1386~* 398°64
92 Z#LA#D VALLEY DAILY BULLETZN SUBSCRIPTIONS 1386~7 32076
122 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN AOVERTZSZ~ 138M6 75000
31411 ZPSA F~ZLY PRACTICE HED. GROUP INC BUSINESS LICENSE 138~8 76021
612 ~SCH~ X~., C~R. V~HXCL~ ~XNTE~NCE ~ 1~8650 Z75.64
~1~96 JOHNSONo CRAIG RECREATION 138652 40.00
179 ~AZSER FOUhDATZON ~EALTH PLAN NEOZCAL INSURANCE 13865] 27**~7.69
61~9 ~AUFMAN AND BROAb REZHB. PEST CNTRL REGISTRATION 13865*
3,91 KELLEY BLUE BOOK ~Ek CAn PRICE HANUAL 13865S 57.92
2220 ~ELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPE~ SULLIES 1386S6 106.19
1216 KNOX NAXNTENA~E S~PLZ~S i 138658 586.69
6090 KONGw SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 138659 480.00
]1397 K~EUSON, JANICE ~EC~EATXON 1~8~0 80.00
31398 KUNXYOSHX~ SUSAN RECREATION 138~1 60.00
1075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY HAXNTE~E SUPPLIES 138662 28740.85
31399 LA~, SUS~ RECREATZ~ 136~3 4S. OO
31386 LAHPASONA, HARZA RECREATZON ~38~4
31400 LEACH, RAN~Y RECREATION 138~5 40.00
5~68 L~XZNGTON TECHNOLOGYt INC. COHPUTER SUPPLIES J 138~6
*622 LIBRARY ADHZNISTRATOR'S DIGEST SUSSCRZPT~ON 138667 39.00
1,55 LONG'S DRUGS FILM PROCESSI~ 138~8 45.02
ZOO LOS ANGELES TZHES SU8SCRZPTZQN J 138~9
31,01 HAGNG~ ARNOLD RECREATION 138670
549 NARXPO~ HORTXCULTURAL ENT.XNC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ~ 138671
4727 HARSHALL PLUMBZNG R~HA&. PROGRAH ~ 138672 2,752.84
250 RARTZNEZ TOHZNG AND AUTOROTZVE TONZNG SERVZCES 138673 50.00
3907 HASTER-SORT~ INC. PRESORT HAIL SERVICES 138674 150.89
38T1 MATT'S HARDWARE BUSINESS L~CENSE REFUND 138675 17.81
528] RAYERe CGBLE g PALMER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 138676 A68.75
31AOZ HCK~Et LZNOA RECREATION 138677
1025 MC~ASTER-CARR SUPPLY COHPANY HAZNTENA~E SUPPLIES J 138678 101.30
31~1~ RENDOZA, D~ANA BUSINESS LICENSE 138679 10.00
6169 HER~ZHAN'St INC. REFUND PLAN CHECK FEE 138680
2198 MICHAELS STOR~S INC. ~3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES 138661 14.91
58~2 HIDNEST TAPe LIBRARY SUPPLXCS ~ 138~2 29.99
7~9 ~Z~AC L AR~ COMPANY ALAR~ SERVICES 138683
C~TY OP RANCHO CUCA#ONGA
LIST OF NABRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 0~-21-99 (98/99)
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARM NO HARK. ANT.
e~ CHECKJ OVERLAP
31413 #ILLER, NILTON A. M.D., ZNCo BUSINESS LICENSE 1386~4
5291 MODERN ALLOYS HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 138685 58-83
31403 MORRIS, KATHY RECREATION 138686 48.00
1020 MOUNTAIN VIE# GLASS C MIRROR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES B 136687 1,076.18
Z248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE t 138668 419.38
31404 NIEBLAS~ PAn RECREATION 138669
5473 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL SECURITY SERVICE 13869O
31419 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTNAK£RS LIaRAMY SUPPLIES 138691 ~.00
~I,05 O'CONNOR~ LEYTY RECREATION ~386~2 60.00
4853 OCLCt INC. CORE SERVICES CHA~GES 138693 69.95
523 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 13869*
5799 OFFICE SOLUTIONS SUPPLIES e I38695 209°59
232 OMNITRANS BUS PASSES 136696 384.50
3072 ONTARIO AIRPORT #AR~IOTT O~POSIT I38697 i,~73.05
Z35 OMEN ELECTriC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 138698 376.61
1823 PAGENET PAGING SERVICE 138699 227.11
31406 PBNTAGES~ G~ORGE RECREATION IJ~TO0 39°00
610 PARAGON BUILDING PROOUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES 138701 19.83
757 PEP BOYS VE~CLE HaINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1~702 6~-08
5720 PERVO PAINT COo NAiNTE##NCE SUPPLIES e 138703 1,94.6.83
4289 PHONE, LORRAINE EXPENSE REI#BURSENENT 136704 70.98
6148 PIRON~ SHAUN SEHS REGULATIONS WORKSI40P 138708 2S3.00
6186 PIT STOP E~BROXDERV & SCREEN PRINT RECREATION REFUND 138706 16939.50
6089 PITTS~ LISA RECREATION REFUND 288707 228-00
1049 POI~ONA VALLEY KAHASA~! VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 6 1~8708 1,340.63
31,16 POWERS, JOHN ROBERT BUSINESS LICENSE 138709 150.00
31415 PRECISION SPECIALTIES CO. $USZNESS LICENSE 138710 31.00
4*57 PRINT TECH ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 138711 407o92
583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR ~ 138712 90.10
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES a 138713 59°87
31,07 ~UAL[TY ~NN [ SUITES DOHNTOHN ~ETZNG 13871* 203-32
$899 QUALT~Y ONE ENGRAVERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 138715 4~o26
1890 R ~ R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES # 138716
2980 R & S FLOOR COVERING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 138717 3~378.00
418 R M A GROUP SOIL TESTING SERVICES # 138718 637oS0
11403 RAZNES, KANDY R~CREATION REFUNDS 138719 48.80
5174 RANCHO CUC&NONGA FAMILY Y~CA PRGGRA# ASSISTANCE PRO&RAN 1~6720 800°00
5513 ~ANOOM HOUSE~ INC. LIBRARY SUPPLIES 136721 15.1,
11415 REAOER'S DIGEST SUBSCRIPTION 136722 24.76
1140& KEO'S PLUMBING CO BUSINESS LICENSE REFINES 138723 31.Z*
27b RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS 138124 26.94
2142 ROSEBURROUGH TOOLS, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 138725 190.72
2082 ROYAL NHOLESALE ELECTRIC ELECTRICICAL SUPPLIES 138726 295o24
11405 RUBENSTEINo BELINDA RECREATION REFUNDS 138727 ~7.50
581 SAN BERN COUNTY CAL-[O PROGRAM 136728 107.00
5029 SAN BERN CGUNTY FIRE OEPTo UNDERGROUNO TANKS 136729 Zl~SJSoZ5
214 SAN BERN COUNTY SOLID HASTE MGHT mONTHLY SERVICE 138730 4,30~.18
2185 SETON IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 138731 1,509.82
1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOM~ INC TELEPHONE SERVICES e 138732 1~654o58
11406 SHOP-N-GO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 138733 15.35
2807 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES 6 138734
CXTY OF RANCHO CUCA#ONGA
LXST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 0.-21-99 (98/99)
VENDOR NA#E ZT~M OESCRZPTIDN dARK NO WARRo AHT.
351 SIGN SHOP. THE
11.19 SILVERSTEIN & ASSOCIATES
· 513 SIMON [ SCHUSTER
1327 SMART ~ FINAL
3946 SMITH COMPANY
317 50 CALXF EDISON CO.,,
319 SO CALZF GAS COMPANY
*961 SOUTHEAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS
1431 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
4868 SPECIALTY CLEANING SYSTEMS
11.07 STAPP HOME eEALTY
· i76 STATE ~CJARD OF EQUALIZATION
11408 STERLZ ~ HOTEL
1~408 ST~L~ HOTEL
TARGET
~&~6 TCSA SAN DIEGO CHAPTER
39.2 TERNZNZX ZNTEKNATTONAL P
4351 TOBXNj RENEE
11409 TURRET PUNCH CO.s XHC
4558 U S GUAROS Cg.~ INC.
· 176 U S PRINTING
2958 UHPS ARE US ASSOCIATION
MAZNT SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS
HONTHLT GAS BILLS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
IMI#THLY ELECTRIC 8ILLS
MAINTENANCE
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS
CLOUT LEGISLATIVE TRIP RESERV
CLOUT LEGISLATIVE TRZP RESERV
YOUTH PROHAH &OAY CA#P SUPPL
COdEREdE REGZSTRATZ~
~NTHLY ~ST CONTROL
~ECREA~ZON REIMBURSEMENT
BUSINESS L~CENSE
SECUriTY GUA~ SERVICE
GUIDELINE HAN~LS
~P SERVICES
4788 UNDERGROUNO SVCo ALERT OF SO. CALIF UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
3437 UNZFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE
5601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES~ INC.
11410 VEAL. LESLIE
6177 VZCKY°S FLDNER SHOP
5Z85 VZKZNG TIRE
5660 VZNEYARD I~EST
5870 VL, SYSTE# $o INC.
*002 dASTE MANAGEMENT
213 ~dAXZE~. KLEEN-LZNE CORP
4331 dEST ENO YidCA
11411 ~ESTo ANGIE
218 IdESTERN HZGMgAY PROOUCTS~ INC
6099 I~HZTAKER e R~CHARO
11.17 NRZGHTe HOMARO Go
11413 dR ZGHTt~ JANES
11226 XPRESSIONS OF YOUTH
11~18 YNZQUEZB TRACEY
11~1~ ZAMBR~NO ~ ANA
~562 ZUHAR [NDUSTR~ ESB
UN%FORM SERVICES
#ANAGERENT SERVICES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION REFUND
VEhiCLE SUPPLZES
RECREatiON
COMPUTER HARDdARE
IdASTE ~ANAGEMENT
HAUNT SUPPLIES
FILES QRTLY eEVIEId
RECREATION REFUNDS
MAZNT SUPPLIES
LEGISLATIVE TRIP TO SACTO
RECREATION REFUNDS
RECREATION REFUNOS
RECREATION REFUND
MILEAGE REZHBURSEMENT
RECREATION REFUNDS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
~rSr CHECK~ OVERLAP
e 13873S 10536. SZ
138736 48.08
138737 68.84
138738 36.40
138739 1.385.00
1~87'0 - 138740
e 1387*1 93,958.74
# 138742 20612-33
138743 530.13
138744 - 138751
# 138751 90870°68
138753 4s150o00
138754 135-00
# 130755 10319000
138756 160.00
130757 160.00
138788 19o00
, 1387s9 z7~.51
130761
138762 $8.00
138763 18.60
138764 83.16
K I~8765 2,050.06
138766 17.77
138767 703.00
138768 211.75
R 138769 817.80
13877O 348.86
138771
138772
138773 903.68
138774 15.00
138775
138716 301.36
# 138777 3~311o92
138778 1~883o48
8 138779 123o00
8 138780 1~3S0o19
~ 138781
138782 6O°OO
138783 40.00
13878* *8°00
138785 3.1~
138786
138787 337.16
TOTAL
406o789.71
THIS BLANK. SHEET SERVES AS
PAGES 11- 16
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMC)NGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
By:
SUBJECT:
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~qeil, City Engineer
John Martin, Associate Engineer
AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE
REPLACEMENT OF DRINKING FOUNTAINS WITH ADA COMPLIANT UNITS AT
VARIOUS CITY PARKS TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS MAINTENANCE
ACCOUNTS.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to
advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for tl~ R~plac~ment of Drinking Fountains with ADA Compliant Units
at Various City Parks.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project was identified by the City ADA Consultant and is a part of the Fiscal Year budget for
1998-99. The account numbers and totals from each account are as follows; 40-4130-9405 $23,720; 41-4130-
9405 $15,490; 43-4130-9405 $6,100; 01-4647-6028 $600; 47-4130-9528 $3,050; 90-4 130-9405 $20,000.
Legal advertising is scheduled for May 17, 24, and 31, 1999, with the bid opening scheduled for Tuesday,
June 7, 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
William J O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JM
Attachment
/7
RESOLUTION NO. ~ '" 0 q ~
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ~ REPLACEDlENT OF DRINKING
FOUNTAINS WITH ADA CO .MPLIANT UNITS AT VARIOUS
CITY PARKS IMPRO :~T PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND I)IRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BiDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the
construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are h~eby approved as the plans and specifications for "THE
REPLACEMENT OF DRINKING FOUNTAINS WITH ADA COMPLIANT UNITS AT
VARIOUS CITY PARKS".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt. of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVIT~:~G SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,
California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office: of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on June 7, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the
"THE REPLACEMENT OF DRINKING FOUNTAINS WITH ADA COMPLIANT UNITS AT
VARIOUS CITY PARKS" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730~
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "THE REPLACEMENT OF DRINKING
FOUNTAINS WITH ADA COMPLIANT UNITS AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
forholiday and overtime work. In thatregard, the Director ofthe Department oflndustrialRelations
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1050t) Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and
are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman,
or mechanic employed for each caler~lar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechanic is paid less than the general p ,revail'mg rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work
done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the pro-
visions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also. fix the r~afio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in
the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be
less than one to five except:
When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
When the Contractor provides evi,dence that he employs registered apprentices on all
of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration
of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements
may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and
be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract,
by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashiers check, certified check, or bidders
bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamot!ga for an amount ec~ual to at least ten percent (10%
of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the
same is awarded to him, and in event of failure ~o enter into such contract said cash, cashiers check,
certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount
of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest
bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said
work shall be one hundred percent (100°/3) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in
an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given
to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and
the Contractor will also be required to fhmish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance
covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between
him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any
and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
including but not limited to a Class *'A'" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class
"LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business
and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section
7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date,
and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City
Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of
$35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00. (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional
nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges
and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth
in the Plans and SpecLfications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contraclofs req'ae~t and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 5th day of May 1999
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 5th day of May 1999.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debbie I. Adams, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: May 17, 24, and 31, 1999
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer e~
Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engin
APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE"NOTICE
INVITING BIDS" FOR THE LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION - SLURRY
SEAL FOR VARIOUS LOCAL STREETS AND PARK TRAILS, TO BEFUNDED
FROM ACCOUNT NO. 324637-9113 AND ACCOUNT NO. 90-4130-7043.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is hereby recommended that the: City Council approve specifications for the construction of the
Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal for Various Local Streets and Park Trails and
approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids".
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal for Various Local Streets and Park Trails, the
scope of work to be performed consists of, but is not limited to, crack sealing, rubberized slurry
sealing, protection and/or adjustment of valve covers and manholes, re-striping and pavement
markings. The project is to be funded from Measure I, Account No. 32-4637-9113. Staff has
determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA
guidelines.
The Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Slurry Seal specifications have been completed by staff
and approved be the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for the project is $184,000. Legal
advertising is scheduled for May 25, 1999 and June 1, 1999, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on
Tuesday, June 15, 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil,
City Engineer
WJO:LEH:Ieh
Attachments
RE OLUTION NO. q q- O q q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ,TIffE STR~T REHABILITATION -
SLU~ox~Y SEAL FOR VARIOUS LOCAL STREETS AND PARK
TRAILS IMPROVE iMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND I)~CTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the
construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presen,,t, ed by the
City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are heIeby approved as the plans and specifications for STREET
REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL. FOR VARIOUS LOCAL STREETS AND PARK
TRAILS".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITIN:G SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,
California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said the City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on June 15, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the
"STREET REHABILITATION - SLURRY SEAL FOR VARIOUS LOCAL STREETS AND PARK
TRAILS" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read i:n the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bid? mu.st be made,,o,n.a form provided. for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Cahforma, marked, Bad for Constructionof" STREET REHABILITATION- SLURRY SEAL FOR
VARIOUS LOCAL STREETS AND PARK TRAILS".
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of Califomia
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard., the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and
are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
such determinations to be posted at the job. site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman,
or mech. ar~.'c e.m. ployed for each c~lendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechamc ~s pard less than the general pmatailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work
done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the pro-
visions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of a!~prentices to journeymen that will be used in
the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be
less than one to five except:
When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all
of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration
of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements
may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Calitbrnia, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and
be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract,
by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed ia accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City of' Rancho Cucamonga for an amount ec~ual to at least ten percent (10%
of the. amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the
same ~s awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers check,
certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount
of the lowest bidders security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest
bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said
work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in
an amount equal to one hundredperee~at (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given
to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the
work contracted to be done by the Contl'actor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and
the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance
covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between
him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any
and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
including but not limited to .a Class '"'A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class
"LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business
and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and mles and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section
7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number o~ the bid, together with the expiration date,
and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided is true and correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Copies of the 1~1 .aris and specifications, available at the office of the City
ngineer, will be furnished upon applioation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of
35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by.payment stipulated above, together with an additional
nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIeFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges
and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth
in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractors sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withl~eld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 5th day of May 1999.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
this 5th day of May 1999.
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk
ADVERTISE ON: May 25, 1999 and hine 1, 1999
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO -' ? '
CUC.AMON C~-A
S ! AFF REPORT
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE
INVITING BIDS" FOR WINDOW
FACILITIES TO BE FUNDED FROM 01-4648-6036.
ADVERTISING OF TIlE "NOTICE
CLEAN1NG SERVICES TO CITY
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for
Window Cleaning Services to city facilities to be funded from 01-4648-6036.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
During past years, window cleaning has been incorporated as a part of the janitorial contract, staff
has determined that the city can achieve better results by contracting directly for window cleaning
with a specialized contractor, and therefore is requesting authorization to advertise for bids.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:DB:jau
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~- /~ 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES
FOR CITY AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to maintain
buildings in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for
the maintenance of buildings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifi. cations presented by the City
of Rancho Cucamonga City Council be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for
the "WINDOW WASHING SERVICES".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITINiG SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Co,until of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFI~CE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICE S
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M.
ON JUNE 2,1999, sealed bids or proposals for the "WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES" in said
City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Council, California, marked, "WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES".
A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Tuesday, May 25, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall, 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may present questions
regardingtheBidDocuments: Proposals and Specifications. THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY.
Verification of attendance at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be documented by signing in at the meeting.
Any bidder not documented as being present at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from
the bid process.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
WINDOW WASHING SERVICES
May 5, 1999
Page 2
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director ofthe Department of Industrial Relations
of the State of California is required to and ihas determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of pet.diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and
are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of
such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman,
or mechanic employed for each caleadar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or
mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work
done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the
provision of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public
works project and which administers the ~ppreaticeship program in that trade for a certificate of
approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the
performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less
than one to five except:
When unemployment in. the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship
committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the
request of certificate, or
When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one
to five, or
When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership
through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one
apprentice to eight journeymen.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
WINDOW WASHING SERVICES
May 5, 1999
Page 3
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentic.es.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be
obtained from the Director of Industrial R,lations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship,
San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and
be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with workring hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day
during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight
(8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the
amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is
awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier' s check, certified
check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the
amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the
difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned
to the lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
WINDOW WASHING SERVICES
May 5, 1999
Page 4
amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to
secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work
contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the
Contractor will also be required to furnish a certLqca~e that he carries compensation insurance
covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between
him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and
all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract in
accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and
Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) And rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the: bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed
by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and
correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available atthe office of the
City Engineer, will be furnished upon ~ppl:i:cation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment
of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), s.aid $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said
request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable
payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the
Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor
may, upon the Contractor's request sad at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute
authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
WINDOW WASHING SERVICES
May 5, 1999
Page 5
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bi~ds for Window Washing Services may be directed
to:
Dale Catton, Facilities Supervisor
9153 Ninth Street
Ran.cho Ct~camonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2700, ext. 2606 or FAX (909) 989=4131
By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this 5* day of May 1999.
ADVERTISE O,N: May 11, 1999 and May 25, 1999
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
C i' 1' 'V ()F R AN C H'O C [. C A M ()N (~ A
STAFiF R'EPORT
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members of the C.~t) Council
Jack Lam, A.I.C.P., City Manager
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
JeffNimeshein, Recreation Supervisor ~
CONSIDERATION OF THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE SELECTION AND RECRUITMENT
PROCESS FOR MEMBERS 'OF THE SENIOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE
_l
RECOMMENDATION
The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
recommendations on the selection and recruitment procedure :for the Senior Advisory Committee.
iBACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
At their regular meeting in April, the i)a:rk and Recreation Commission approved three
recommendations from the Senior Advisory Committee relating to the recruitment and selection of
Committee members. Specifically, the Park and Recreation Commission addressed a timetable fbr
appointing members, the term of members, and number of members.
Appointment Schedule: The iPar'k and Recreation Commission recommendsthat
appointments to the Senior Advisory Committee be made in January of each year. An
important exception to this rule would be that a recruitment and appointment process would
take place at any time throughout the year when at least three vacancies occur on the
Committee. The existing procedure requires annual review and reappointment of all
Committee members and allows the Park and iRecreation Commission to appoint up to
fifteen (15) Cornmittee rnembers. Currently, there are ten (10) members remaining on the
Senior Advisory Committee.
Comm~tt~.;e me:mbers that the Senior Advisory Committee could
It was the ()pinion of" 'TM
adequately function without undue affect when one or two members retire. However, when
three or more positions become vacant, there was concern they may lose effectiveness, and
thereibre a recruitment should be initiated at that time.
This iprocedure would also help ease the necessity of continuous evaluation and appointment
by the Park 'and Recreation Commission.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
SELECTION/RECRUITMENT PROCESS FOR SENIOR ADVIS(. RY COMMITTEE
May 5, 1999
Page 2
Terms: The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that all Sem(r Advisory
Committee members be appointed without specific term lengths.
Although Committee members are now appointed to one year terms only, under current
practice they continue to serve on the Committee beyond this period l~)r as long as they wish
on an ongoing basis without renewal.
Committee members expressed the feeling that because the current practice has worked
smoothly and has not caused problems, extending a continuous appointment was very
satislhctory and should be incorporated into the process. Because membership is primarily
stable, and members usually desire to remain long term. this tbrm of appointment adds
continuity to the Committee.
In addition, by having no time limit on terms the time consuming need tbr members to
continually reapply, as well as Commissioners to restart the review process would be
drastically reduced.
N umber of Members: The Park and Recreat:ion Com m i s si{:: r~ re :ommen ds that mem bershi p
be increased from ilfteen to eighteen members.
Increasingly, the Senior Advisory Committee has become a working Committee with
:members interact:ing on various programs and committees. In 1990, this Advisory
Committee was originally known as the Senior Action Force with twenty-one members who
also participated on numerous project committees. The Committee Iblt that a small increase
in numbers would aid in being more efficient. Cur:rer~tly, the Committee has ten active
members.
Respecl~ully submitted~
Community Services I)irector
KM/JN/mv
I: ',C I'I'YCOI. J N\S RADV RE(?. WPD
C:ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
April 28, 1999
TO:
Mayor, City Council, City iManager
FROM:
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
By:
Robert Bowery, Info Systems Manager
SUBJECT:
AUTHORIZATION FOR THiE TO PURCHASE AN IBM S7A AIX
APPLICATION SERVER TO REPLACE THE IBM RS/6000 APPLICATION
SERVER, FROM PIONEER STANDARD ELECTRONICS THROUGH THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES,
PROCUREMENT DIVISION, 1999 CONTRACT, 3-97-70-0430A, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $317,,660 F'ROM ACCOUNT 74-4225-7047 AS APPROVED IN
FY 98/99 BUDGET.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the replacement purchase of one IBM S7A
application server from Pioneer Standard iElectronics through the State of California CMAS
contract in the amount of $317,660 from account 744225-7047.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In the FY 1998/99 Budget, City Council approved the ipurchase of replacement of IBM RS/6000
as identified in the budget document. Replacing the IBM RS/6000 will resolve the issues the city
has been experiencing due in part to age. and a lack of replacement parts.
The Purchasing Division used the State of Califbrnia Multiple Awards Schedule (CMAS) to
acquire the best possible pricing for the above equipment. The specifications of the City met
those within the CMAS contract as provided by' Pioneer Standard Electronics approved by the
State as the lowest, responsive and responsible bidder. Staff recommends the award of contract to
Pioneer Standard Electronics.
Respectfully submitted.
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY
SUBJECT:
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Henry Murakoshi, Associate .Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROViEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY' AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE iDISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1. AND 6 FOR CUP 97-19 LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY' AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving CUP 97-19,
accepting the Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securifes and ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and
authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
CUP 97-19, located at the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, was
approved by the Planning Commission on the 8t~ day of October, 1997, for a development of
commercial shopping center consisting of a 68,355 square feet of grocery/drug store, two satellite
buildings totaling 5,000 feet, 2 each, and two drive thru pads totaling 3,500 and 2,500 feet,
respectively, on 9.82 acres of land
The Developer, American Stores iProperties, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to
guarantee the construction of the improvements in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond:
Labor and Materiahnen Bond:
$1,705,280.00
$ 852,640.00
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:dlw
Attachments
VICINITY MAP
BERNARDINO
RD
bLVD
CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
5 1 A i I,.,, OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. q q-- /O/t
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA,. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES FOR CUP 97-19
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its
consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by American Stores Properties, Inc., as
developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP 97-19; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNC, IL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the
Mayor is authorized to execute s~une on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, sub. ject to
approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney.
d?
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU'NCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMOiNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 'NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT iN'OS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 97-19
WHEREAS, the City Council of'the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Maintenance District:"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City' Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and heating or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY C, OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS ::
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
A..%$E$$M£NT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAI'E MAINTENANCE DISTHICT NO.
SI'I-{EEI' LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTI:IICT NOS. '1 AND G
. ~.,~.,CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
":~~'L/:... ~~COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
:0,~,:~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CUP 97-19
Exhibit "A"
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist.
SI
S6
EXFIIBIT "B"
WORK PROGRAM
PiROIECT': CUP 97-19
NUMBER OF LAMPS
5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L
-- 10 3 ---
27,500L
LANDSCAPING:
Community
Equestrian
Trail
Dist. D.G.S.F.
L3B
Tuff
S.F.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment U'nits
By District
Parcel Acres SI $2 LI
N/A 9.82 9.82 9.82 9.82
Non-Turf
S
Trees
Ea.
Hardscape
S.F.
2,400
Annexation Date: May 5, 1999
Form Date 11/16/94
q/
CITY ()FRANC. HO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
May 5,1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Jerry Dyer, Project Manager' ~)
Michael D. Long, SupervisinE Public Works Inspector,.7/~/
AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE
CONSTRUC. TION OF' FY 1998/99 ADA RAMPS ON ARCHIBALD AVENUE, FROM
BASE LlNE ROAD SOUTH TO SIXTH STREET AND VARIOUS LOCATIONS, TO
THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, PERRY MANESS INDUSTRIES, FOR THE AMOUNT
OF $129,626.75 ($117,842.50 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM
TDA ARTICLE 3 ACCOU'NT NO. 16-4637-9106 IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,000.00;
PROPOSITION 111 FUND ACCOUNT NO. 10-4637-9804 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$80,000.00; AND MEASURE I -. LOC, AL - ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9106 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $45,626.75 (PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the construction
of the FY 1998/99 ADA Ramps on Archibald Avenue, from Base Line Road south to Sixth Street and various
locations, in the amount of $129,626.75 ($117,842.50 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from TDA Article
3 Account No. 16-4637-9106 in the amount of $4,000.00; Proposition 111 Fund Account No. 10-4637-9804
in the amount of $80,000.00; and Measure I - Local - Account No. 32-4637-9106 in the amount of
$45,626.75 (plus 10% contingency).
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 13, 1999, for the subject
project. The Engineer's estimate was $115,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to
be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background
investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Respectfully submitted,'
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO/JD/MDL:Is
3 A~. MH Frame & Cover to Grade
4 Adj. Water Valve Box to Grade
5 Adj. Gas Valve Box to Grade
6 Adj. Irrigation Control Valve
Adj. CATV Box & Cover to Grade
Adj. GTE Box 8: Cover to Grade
9 P.C.C. Curb (Various 6" to 8")
6" P.C.C. Driveway Approach
11 8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach
12 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk, inc. Removals
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
SF
SF
3
1
1
1
1
222
860
9610
3880
$600.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$100.00
$17.00
$3.50
$.>.7_
$2.40
$1.200.00
$150.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$100.00
$3,774.00
$3,010.00
$36.037.50
$9,312.00
$400.00
$250.00
$300.00
$400.00
$400.00
$400.00
$18.00
$5.50
$5,50
$4.00
$800.00
$750.00
'$300.00
$400.00
$400.00
$400.00
$3,996.00
$4.730.00
$52,855.00
$15.520.00
$500.00
$50.00
$150.00
$100.00
$150.00
$150.00
$14.00
$5.50
$6.75
$4.00
$1.000.00
$150.00
$150.00
$100.00
$150.00
$150.00
$3,108.00
$4,730.00
$64.867.50
$15.520.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR
ADA ACCESS RAMPS ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE
FROM 6TH STREET TO BASE LINE ROAD AND VARIOUS LOCATIO~qS
Bids Opened on April 13, 1999
Engineer's Estimate =
Item
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
Item Unit of Estimated
Description Measure QuantiD'
Clearing & Grubbing SF !
Asphalt Concrete Pavement TON 110
,~,uj. MH Frame ~' '~ ....... Grade EA
Adj. Water Valve Box to Grade EA 3
Adj. Gas Valve Box to Grade EA 1
Adj. Irrigation Control Valve EA 1
Adj. CATV Box & Cover to Grade EA i
/4uj. G t c Box & Cover to Grade EA !
P C C Curb (Various ~ .....
6" P.C.C. Driveway Approach SF 860
8" P.C.C. Driveway Approach SF 9610
4" P~C:C. Sidewalk, inc. Removals SF 3880
P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp SF 5450
P.C.C. Spandrels inc. Removals SF 2580
P.C.C. Splash Curbs LF 122
Adj. \Vater Meter Box to Grade EA 3
Rockscape SF 370
Chain Link Fence. Inc. removal LF 15
Restore Hardscape & Landscape LS 1
Traffic Control LS 1
Relocate Traffic Signs & Electric LS 1
Pero' Maness Industries
Total
S. Parker Engineering, Inc.
Total
Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $2.000~00
$76.00 $8,360.00 $4.40 $484.00
$75.00 $150.00 $500.00 $ ! .000.00
$75.00 $225.00 $300.00 $900.00
$75.00 $75.00 $200.00 $200.00
$75.00 $75.00 $ t 00.00 $100.00
$75.00 $75.00 $200.00 $200.00
~-7~ ~n $75.00 q;~ ~ 0 $I
..... 00. _-'0 aaa aa
...................... >>,88.~.00
$4.25 $3,655.00 $4.50 $3,870.00
$4.50 $43,245.00 $5.50 $52,855.00
$3.00 $i 1,640.00 $3.75 $14,550.00
$3.25 $17,712.50 $4.00 $21.800.00
$4.00 $10,320.00 $10.00 $25.800.00
$14.00 $1,708.00 $10.00 $l.220.00
$ t 50.0() $450.0t) $100.00 $300.00
$ i 3.50 $4,995.00 $O.00 $2.220.00
$18.00 $270.00 $40.00 $600.00
$150.00 $150.00 $2,500.00 $2.500.00
$2.500.00 $2.500.00 $2.000.00 $2.000.00
$2.500.00 $2,500.00 $5.000.00 $5,000.00
$117,842.50 $144,482.00
Item
No.
1
2
Item Unit of Estimated
Description Measure QuantiD'
Clearing 8: Grubbing SF 1
Asphalt Concrete Pavement TON 110
K.A.S. Equip. & Rental, Inc. West Coast Construction
Total Total
Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
$12,000.00 $12,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
$68.00 $7,480.00 $150.00 $16.500.00
H & H General Contractors
Total
Unit Price Bid
$5.000.00 $5,000.00
$100.00 $11,000.00
$200.00 $400.00
$ ! 00.00 $300.00
$100.oo $ 100.00
$ 100.00 $100.00
$300.00 $300.00
$~'~ '~'~ $300.00
$18~00 $3,996.00
$6.00 $5,160.00
$7.00 $67,270.00
$3.50 $13,580.00
$5.00 $27,250.00
$6.00 $15,480.00
$12.00 $1,464.00
$ t 00.00 $300.00
$ t 0.o0 $3.700.00
$80.00 $1.200.00
$2.000.00 $2,000.00
$8.000.00 $8,000.00
$3.000.00 $3,000.00
$169,900.00
J.D.C. Incorporated
Total
Unit Price Bid
$12,000.00 $12,000.00
$100.00 $11,000.00
('1!'I'Y ()1: RANClIO CI iCAM()N(i~A
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJLC .
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members of the C, ity Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manage:r
William J. O'Neil, Ci~:y Engineer
Linda R. Beek. Jr. Engineerd~
RELEASE THE MAINTENANCE BOND FOR DR 95-30, LOCATED ON BERYl,,
SOUTIt OF ttlLI,S1DE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the C.~ y Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Bond
tbr DR 95-30.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSI.:
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from
defects in materials and workmanship.
Developer:
Release:
H & H Development
2258 Palomino Drive
Covi:na, CA 91724
Maintenance Bond
' 't
Letter of Cred:t in the amount of $7,211.00
Respectfull~ubmitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:I,RB:Is
~,;11'Y ()F RANCII¢.) CI,i(TAM{)N~
STAFF RRPORT
DATE: May 5, 1999
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
William J. ()'Neil, Cily Engineer
B Y:
Linda R. 13eek, Jr. Enginecr,4~
SUBJECT:
RELEASE TItE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND HELD AS A
M A IN TEN ,AN C E B C) N D iF O R 1"tLAC T 14116, L O C AT ED O N T H E S O U TH S I D E
OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Bond
fi:)r Tracl 14116.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain ti'ee from
delbcts in materials and workmanship.
Developer:
Sheffield Alta Loma 55, Ltd
3400 Central Average, Suite 325
Riverside, CA 925()6
Release:
Maintenance Bond
TPI 3893764 $120,100.00
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O*Neil
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:Is
J
ORDINANCE NO. 600
RECITALS.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-01, A PROPOSAL
TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO
LOW-MEDIUM REStDENTIA~L (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE)
WITH A MASTER PLAN OVERLAY, FOR 17.85 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND
LEMON AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 201-272-17 AND 18.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has authorized the
filing of an application for Development District Amendment No. 99-01 as
described in the titte of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the
subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On March 10, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan
Amendment No. 99-01 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the properties at the northeast
corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues.
3. On March 10, 1999,. the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga recommended approval of Development District Amendment
No. 99-01 to change the Development District Map from Medium Residential
(8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units
per acre) for the properties at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon
Avenues.
4. On April 21, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
approved the associated General Plan Amendment No. 99-01 to change the
General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units
per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the
properties at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues.
5. On April 21, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
6. All legal prerequisit:es prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
Ordinance 600
Page 2
ORDINANCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public headng on April 21,1999, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically
finds as follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling
approximately 17.85 acres, basically a rectilinear configuration,
located near the nodheast corner of Highland and Lemon
Avenues and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently
within the Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per) District
with a Master Plan Overlay designation; and
b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are
vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) arid is developed with a
single family residential project. The property to the east is
designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
and is vacant with a concrete flood control channel. The
property to tile south, on the south side of Highland Avenue,
within the Victoria Planned Community, is designated as Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is
developed with a single family residential project; and
c. This amendment does not conflict with the, Land Use Policies of
the General Plan and will provide for development within the
district in a rnanner consistent with the General Plan and with
related development upon the enactment of General Plan
Amendment 99-01; and
d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land
Use Element:; and
e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental
to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant
impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
m
Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set
forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes
as follows:
That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the
proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land uses in the surrounding area as evidenced by the
Ordinance 600
Page 3
m
Conceptual Master plan for a single family residential
development exhibited in the previous Vesting Tentative Tract
13890 application; and
That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-
01.
Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect
upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended, an¢l the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study
prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City
Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered
the information contained in said Negative Declaration with
regard to the application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse
environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows:
In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and
Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that
the proposed: project will have potential for an adverse impact
upon wildlife resources or' the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Furtiler, based upon substantial evidence contained
in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and
the information provided to the City Council during the public
hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of
adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations.
Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and
4 above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment
99-01 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-
Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)with a Master Plan Overlay
as shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
Ordinance 600
Page 4
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of April, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN E D:
ATTEST:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of March, 1999, and was finally passed at
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 7th day of April,
1999.
Executed this 8th day of .April, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
Ordinance 600
Page 5
M '~ LM
V.P.C.
M
CITY OF R '"'~~~.CAMONGA
PLANNIN~.iDI~IS'ION
C'ITY C)F RANCFIO CUCAMONG. A --
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMEND,MENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-
A request to amend the regulations for wireless communication facilities.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Several wireless communication carriers expressed concern with the limited ability to provide
service to areas along the future Route 3,0 freeway and the northern portion of the City. The
proposed amendment offers greater siting opportunities by allowing locations on existing utility
towers, light poles, and additional stealth faci~lities. Staff feels the revisions will allow improved
service coverage in a manner which minimizes skyline clutter. Attached are the Planning
Commission Staff Report, Minutes, and Resolution No. 99-31 for City Council consideration.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper,
~~Brad .B~ller
City Planner
BB:RVB:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 14, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated April 14, 1999
Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 99-31
Ordinance
CI"FY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 14, 1999
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-01-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
A request to amend the regularlions for wireless communication facilities.
BACKGROUND: AirTouch Cellular and Southern California Edison have provided a proposal
regarding potential revisions to the wireless communication facilities ordinance. Revisions are
relatively minor and consistent with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. AirTouch Cellular
withdrew its variance application involving a communication site concealed within a proposed
70-foot high cross at the Alta Loma Bret:hren in Chdst Church, located at 9974 19th Street. Staff
and the applicant believe that a code amendment would be a more appropriate vehicle to address
siting issues.
ANALYSIS: Revisions offer greater siting opportunities by allowing locations on utility towers, light
poles, and additional stealth facilities to minimize skyline clutter. The proposed amendment revises
four areas of the current code as follows:
Adds "utility towers" and "light poles" to the definition of the term"building mounted." This
allows carriers to mount antennas to existing electric towers and light standards under the
Minor Development Review process. Exhibit "B" of this report contains photographs of typical
tower and pole attachments.
Expands the definition of "minor wireless communication facility" to include stealth facilities
that are constructed within the height limits of the applicable zone. Adoption of this
amendment would not allow for installation of the 7'O-foot high cross previously proposed by
AirTouch because the cross exceeds height limits in the zone.
Allows co-location opportunities on nonconforming facilities, such as a monopole established
prior to the adoption of the wireless communication ordinance within 500 feet of a residential
district, which would not be eligible to apply for a Conditional Use Permit under current
standards. The revision contemplated in the amendment would allow the Planning
Commission to consider modification of the existing facility for co-location purposes through
a Conditional Use Permit. A secondary user on a non-conforming facility would be subject to
the same limitations and amortization period as the primary facility. For example, if a non-
conforming facility was completely destroyed in a natural disaster, neither the original user nor
the co-located user would be able to re-build to the pre-disaster form. At that juncture, any
request to rebuild would have to comply with current standards in the Development Code.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCA 99-01 CITY OF R.C.
April 14, 1999
Page 2
Allows a temporaw facility while an approved permanent facility is under construction subject
to City Planner review and approval..
The proposed changes are indicated on the attached Chapter 17.26 of the Development Code
(Exhibit C) with additional language in bold italics and deleted language shown with overstrike.
Staff feels the revisions allow for improved service coverage within the City in a manner that is less
obtrusive and visually obstructive to the community. The amendment further has the potential to
reduce the ultimate number of monopote installations within commercial and industrial areas of the
City.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The amendment is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3)..
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public, hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
Resolution recommending approval of Development Code Amendment 99-01 to the City Council.
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:RVB:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Letter from Richards & Wilkes dated January 25, 1999
Exhibit "B" - Edison Presentation (overview and photos) dated February 16, 1999
Exhibit "C" - Chapter 1'7.26 of Development Code
Resolution of Approval
RICHARDS & WILKES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
Januaw 25,1999
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729
RECEIVED
JAN ~B 8 1999
City ot Rancho Cucamonga
p~anning Division
RE: Proposal by AirTouch Cellular to Amend Selected Sections of City Code
Governing Wireless Communication Facilities, Ordinance No. 570
Dear Commissioners:
On behalf of AirTouch Cellular, I request that the Commission initiate
amendments to Ordinance No. 570 governing the location and construction of
wireless communication facilities.
On October 28, 1998, the Commission considered Variance No. 98-O3, a
proposal by AirTouch Cellular to increase the maximum height of the Medium
Residential District from 50 to 70 feet for the purpose of constructing a cross-
tower on property owned by Alta Loma Brethren in Christ Church. The cross
structure wes to be used to conceal cellular antennas. The Commission
determined that the variance was not the appropriate regulatory tool to
accomplish our objective, and was not supportive of increasing the height limit.
The matter was continued off calendar and it was suggested that we meet with
Staff.
Subsequent to the hearing we met with Brad Buller, Dan Coleman and Cecilia
Williams, to discuss our service dilemma and develop some options. We
concluded that a few modest modifications to the Wireless Code would resolve
many of our concerns and offer greater siting opportunities.
Attached is a copy of the existing Code with our suggested revisions noted in
bold Italic. Please understand that it is not our intent to effectuate wholesale
changes to the Code, or undermine its original purpose. Rather, we are
proposing some reasonable revisions that would allow AirTouch, and other
carriers as well, to site facilities in selected locations, and still meet the
objectives embodied in the code
Before addressing the specific code sections, let me outline our goals for service
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
6529 RIVERSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 115, RIVERSIDE, CA. 92506
909-276-.8010 / FAX 909-276-8013
RCPC
Page 2 of 4
Improve service in the northerly reaches of the City: Our service in the
north area of the City is marginal at best. Specifically, we have two
problems to solve:
a) Capacity - The existing cell sites are reaching capacity, which
means there is an i:nsufficient number of channels available during
peak calling periods.
b) Signal Strength - The signal from the existing sites is borderline
and calls can not always be "handed off from one site to another.
Both problems result in an unacceptable number of dropped and
uncompleted calls. New facilities, especially in the northerly portion of the
City, will bring service to acceptable levels.
Prepare for service along the Highway 210 / 30 Corridor: As you know the
freeway is under constructions. We are interested in establishing sites
along this corridor now, so we are prepared to serve motorists and
commuters using' the new route.
The City Wireless Facilities Code (Ordinance No. 570) contains three provisions
that impact the siting of our facilities, and thus our service.
Definition of major facilities- The Code defines a "major facility" as any
ground or roof mounted facility. This includes any freestanding facility, even
if the facility is designed to blend into the existing environment, i.e. stealth
facility. To some extent, the provision conflicts with the primary siting
criterion contained in the code, namely that stealth sites with concealed
antennas are preferred. Furthermore, due to the language used in the
definition, antenna mounted to a utility pole are also considered major
facilities.
Residential limitations to the siting of major facilities - The Code bars all
major facilities in residential zones and within 500 feet of residential uses.
This provision creates two obstacles to the improvement of service in the
northerly portions of the City::
. Most properties along the Highway 210 / 30 corridor are zoned for, or
developed in, residential uses,
o Properties that are not zoned for residential use, and potentially
available for wireless facilities, are usually within 500 feet of such
uses.
RCPC
Page 3 of 4
Provision for temporary facilities - Once a facility is approved it takes
approximately 6 months to get it on line. When the site is a high priority, It
would be helpful if the Code allowed for the deployment of a temporary I
interim cell site, while the permanent site is under construction.
4. The provisions relating to co-t~ocati:on preclude do not address co-location on
a non-conforming facility (approved prior to adoption of Ordinance No. 570).
To resolve these siting issues we propose the following minor revisions to the
Code.
A. Add "utility towers" and "light poles" to the definition of the term "building
mounted". This change, combined with the provisions relating to minor
wireless facilities, will allow carriers to mount antennas to electric towers and
light ¢tandards, under the Minor Development Review process. We believe
this revision will encourage structure-mounted facilities, in compliance with
the Code.
B. We ask that the definition of "minor wireless communication facility"
encompass a "stealth facility" that is constructed within the height limit of the
applicable zone. Because minor facilities are permitted in residential zones,
this modest change would encourage stealth-designed facilities where they
are compatible with residential development. Furthermore, there will be no
visual impact on residential properties, as a properly designed stealth facility
will appear to be an element of an already existing use.
C. The Code encourages co-location, however, when an antenna array is to be
placed on a non-conforming facility, the Development Code requires that the
modified facility conform to the current Wireless Code standards, including
the residential limitations. We recommend that the Code be amended to
allow, without conforming to new standards, the modification of an existing
facility for co-location purposes.
D. Finally, we ask that the City offer a carrier the opportunity to deploy a
temporaw facility while the approved permanent facility is under construction.
AirTouch, and other carriers, are working to improve the design of wireless
facilities. As you know,, it is not unusual to see towers designed as pine trees,
palm trees, crosses, clock towe~rs, and windmills, to name a few. Furthermore,
we are working with Southern California Edison to establish a master agreement
RCPC
Page 4 of 4
that will allow the mounting of antennas on electrical towers. We simply. ask that
our efforts and successes can be reflected in your City's Code.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Joseph A. Richards
Land Use Consultant to AirTouch Cellular
?' , : Vireless Telecommu '
................ ntcatiot :
IIIgl]llll ~11111
?
~ ~ m
~§ ~ m
~:~ <
Cheryl Karns and Timothy Davis
February 16, 1999
~"'1 EDISON
An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company
An EDI$ON INTER,~IA TIONAL Company
· O ,erview
The Telecom Industry
City Government Concerns
SCE Assistance
SCE Installation Standards
The Permitting Process
Moving Forward
An EDISON INTERNATIONAl, Company
Telecom Act of I996
Creates New Wireless Opportunities
Cellular- Analog
PCS - Digital
Paging
} LMDS
Automated Metering
Internet Service Providers
Other Agencies With Wireless Needs ~. Federal
~- State
~. Counties / Cities
~. Utilities
3
An EDISON INTERNA~IONA£ Company
Key City Issues
Visual Impacts
Concerns from Constituency
Permitting Process
} Monopole Installations
Throughout City
4
An EOI80N INTERNA770NAL Company
How Can SCE Assist ?
Attach to Existing Infrastructure
(SCE Tower)
VS.
Construction of New Monopole
SCE Service Territory
50,000 square miles
Bishop 4.1 million customers (11 million population)
~ +x,~, ~ 19,000 miles of underground conduit
% '**+ ~. /ounty ~ 1.5 million wood poles
~.* ~ ' 14,000 electrical transmission towers
~~ . ~ 125 communications towers
/ ~* *~...~ i 200 site~ for communications buildings
+ r~ ~
~ ~ ~ Iny, Extensive fiber optic and dioital microwave
:~*+ + 5 Ridge~st
+ + + Count'f + +~
Barbara + + + X +
~ount" ~tura + + ~- .
Golet~ ,,+ ~";" ++; ++ + ~ ¢; San aernamino County
Rivemide Co
Palm , +
County~+ ~'t+ ++,+
,I-
I
+ ::-Edison
An F. DI$ON INTERNATIONAL Company
Hi_: h Standards
Tower attachments are installed in accordance with
CPUC G.O. #95. SCE maintains responsibility for:
Engineering
Attachment
Installation
Design
Fabrication
Installation
Our 1 ~t priority is to insure that
attachments will not interfere with
providing
safe, reliable electricity.
An EDISON IbiTERNAITONAL Company
High Standards (cont.)
However, it is incumbent on the client to obtain
appropriate permits from the jurisdictional enti~
Microceil Install
located on
SCE street
~.~,ht pole
An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company
The Permitting Process
Ill] II Ill
When permits requested to attach to SCE Assets
Consider administrative approval:
} Improved service for residents
} Reduces processing man-hours for Cities
} Include as option in City plans/ordinances
} Competition reduces prices for cellular service
9
An EDISON INTERNA770NAL Company
In Closing
By Working Together We Can
} Minimize Visual Impacts
,. Decrease Monopole installations
~ Assist with Public Concerns
Streamline Permitting Process
~ Include as option in city plans
10
Rancho Cucantonga Development C'ot&~
GHAPTER 17.26
Sections 17.26.010 & 17.26.020
Wireless Communications Facilities
Section 17.26.010 - Purpose
The purpose of these regulations and guidelines is to regulate the establishment of wireless
communication facilities and thereby protect the public health, safety, general welfare, and
quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga, while preserving the rights of wireless
communications providers. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found and
determined that these regulations and guidelines for wireless communication facilities are
necessary' to attain these goals. These regulations are intended to supersede applicable
provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code pertaining to communication
facilities, and to establish flexible guidelines for the governance of wireless communication
facilities which recognize the unique land use distribution, topography, and aesthetic
characteristics of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Wireless communications facilities are
prohibited in the City of Rancho Cucamonga except as otherwise provided herein.
Section 17.26.020 - Definitions
Unless otherwise stated, the following definitions pertain to this Chapter:
A
ANTENNA: means a device used in wireless communications which radiates and/or
receives commercial cellular, personal communication service, and/or data radio signals.
"Antenna" shall not include any satellite dish antenna or any antenna utilized for amateur
radio, citizens band radio, television, AM/FM, or shortwave. radio reception purposes.
B
C
BUILDING-MOUNTED: means mounted to the side of a building, to the facade of a building,
or to the side of another structure such as a water tank, church steeple, freestanding sign,
utility tower, light pole, or simi~a.r structure, but not to include the roof of any structure.
CELLULAR: means an analog or digital wireless communication technology that is based
on a system of interconnected neighboring cell sites.
CO-LOCATED: means the locating o.f wireless communications equipment from more than
one provider on a single wireless communication facility.
G
GROUND-MOUNTED: me,ans mounted to a pole, monopole, tower, or other freestanding
structure specifically constructed for the purpose of supporting an antenna.
M
MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a wireless communication
facility that is ground- or roof-mounted or mounted in or on any public property including the
public right-of-way.
MINOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a wireless communicati:on
facility that is stealth in design and does not exceed the height limit of the district in
which it is located, or building-, facade-, or wall-mounted and does not exceed the height
1'7,26-1
EXHIBIT "C"
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 1 Z26.030
wall or roof line of the building. A roof-mounted facility which is screened by a solid material on
all four sides and does not exceed the maximum height of the district shall be considered a
minor wireless communication facility..
MONOPOLE: means a structure composed of a single spire, pole, or tower used to support
antennas or related equipmenL
MOUNTED: means attached or supported.
P
PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICE: means digital low-power, high-frequency
commercial wireless radio communication technology that has the capacity for multiple
communications services and the routing of calls to individuals, regardless of location.
R ROOF-MOUNTED: means mounted above the eave line of a building.
S
STEALTH FACILITY: means any communication facility which is designed to blend into the
surrounding environment, typically one that is architecturally integrated into a building or other
concealing structure, and shall include and mean any concealed antenna.
TEMPORARY WIRELESS COMMUNICA T!ON FACILITY: means a wireless communication
facility that is kept portable or mobile and deployed while a permanent facility is under
construction.
W
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a facility consisting of any commercial
antenna, monopole, microwave dish, and/or other related equipment necessary to the
transmission and/or reception of cellular, personal communication service, and/or data radio
communications, and which has been. granted a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity, or a Wireless Registration Number by the California Public Utilities Commission, or
otherwise provides wireless communications services to the public.
Section 17,26.030 - Development Criteria for All Wireless Communication Facilities.
A. Screening and Site Selection Guidelines.
1. Stealth facilities and concealed antennas are preferred.
Wireless communications facilities shall be located where the existing topography,
vegetation, buildings, or other' structures provide the greatest amount of screening.
Where insufficient screening exists, applicants shall provide screening satisfactory to the
City Planner, or as otherwise required herein.
Ground-mounted wireless communication facilities shall be located only in close proximity
to existing above-ground utilities, such as electrical tower or utility poles (which are not
scheduled for removal or undergrounding for at least 18 months after the date of
application), light poles, trees of comparable heights, and in areas where they will not
detract from the appearance of the City.
4. Wireless communication facilities shall be located in the following order of preference:
Go located with orb.or ,,~ejor wireless ¢o,'~,,,unication facilities. When co-located
on the same building, structure, or' wireless facility.
17,,26.,2 2/97
Rancho Cucamonga Development C'od~' Sectio,~ 17.26.030
Go
The facility replaces or' modifies an existing facility for purposes of co-
location. On existing structures such es buildings, co,,,,~unicatio. n towers, or utility
facilities.
c. On existing signal, power, light, or similar kinds of poles.
d. In industrial districts.
e. In commercial districts.
f. In residential districts (minor wireless communications facilities only).
Major wireless communication facilities are not permitted to locate within 500 feet of any
residential structure, within any residential district, or within 500 feet of any existing,
legally established major wireless communication facility except when co-located on the
same building, structure, or wireless facility. For the purposes of this Chapter, all
distances shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening structures,
from the nearest point of the proposed major wireless communication facility to the
nearest property line of any resi:dential land use, or to the nearest point of another major
wireless communication facility.
Development Requirements.
o
As part of the application process, applicants for wireless communication facilities shall
be required to provide written documentation demonstrating good faith efforts in locating
facilities in accordance with the Site Selection Guidelines (order of preference).
Wireless communication facilities shall not bear any signs or advertising devices other
than certification, warnin(.':l, or other required seals or legally required signage.
All accessory equipment associated with the operation of the wireless communication
facility shall be located within a building, enclosure, or underground vault that complies
with the development standards of the district in which the accessory equipment is
located, subject to City approval. If the equipment is permitted to be located above
ground, it shall be visually compalible with the surrounding buildings and include sufficient
landscaping to screen the structure from view.
Wireless communication facilities shall be subdued colors and non-reflective materials
which blend with surrounding materials and colors.
All screening for building-mounted facilities shall be compatible with the existing
architecture, color, texture, and/or materials of the building.
Monopolos and antennas shall be no greater in diameter or other cross-sectional
dimensions than is necessary for the proper functioning el the wireless communications
facility. The applicant st~all provide documentation satisfactory to the City Planner
establishing compliance with this subsection.
17,,26-3 2-/97
Rancho Cucamonga Develo?ment Code Section 17. 26.040 - 17. 26.070
Section 17.26.040 - Approval of Minor Wireless Communication Facilities.
Minor wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the City Planner pursuant to
Section 17.06.020 Minor Development Review procedures of the Rancho Cucamonga Development
Code. In considering applications for minor wireless communication facilities, the City Planner shall
be guided by both the provisions of Section 17.06.020 and this Chapter. However, in the event of any
inconsistency in said standards, the provisions of this Chapter shall govern. The decision of the City
Planner shall be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days pursuant to Section 17.020.080 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
Section 17.26.050 - Approval of Major Wireless Communication Facilities.
Major wireless communication facilities shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission. In
considering applications for major wireless communications facilities, the Planning Commission shall
be guided by the provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and this Chapter,
However, in the event of any inconsistencies in said standards, the provisions of this Chapter shall
govern. The decision of the Planning Commission sha~l be final unless appealed in writing within 10
calendar days pursuant to Section 17.02.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
~Section 17.26.051 - Deployment of Temporary Facility.
A temporary wireless communication facility may be deployed subject to approval by
the City Planner and the following:
A permanent wireless communication facility has been approved for the property
in question..
The temporary facility was approved as part of the conditional use permit or
minor development review.
3. The facility is deployed ;for no more than six months, provided that two
extensions may be granted by the City Planner; however, the total period shall
not exceed one year.
Section 17.26.060 - Height Criteria for Major Wireless Communications Facilities.
No wireless communications facility shall exceed the maximum building height for the applicable
district unless the facility is utilized by two or more wireless communication providers pursuant to a
conditional use permit. The Planning Commission may consider approval of facilities proposed to
exceed the maximum height limit subject to the review and approval of a conditional use permit
application pursuant to Section 17.04.030 el the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
Section 17.26.070 - Conditional Use Permit Required.
Each major wireless communication faciility for which an application is made during the term of this
Chapter must first receive final approval era conditional use permit in accordance with Section
17.04.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. As a condition of issuance of a conditional
use permit for a facility utilizing the public righ'l-of-way, an applicant may be required to enter into a
franchise agreement with the City.
17.26~4
Rancho Cucamonga Development Co~fi:' Sections 17. 26.080- 17. 26.1 O0
Section 17.26.080 - Variance.
Any person may apply for a variance as to the requirements set forth herein pursuant to Section
17.04.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code.
Section 17.26.090 - Revocation.
Any approval granted pursuant to this Chapter may, after notice and hearing, be terminated for
violation of any provisions of this Chapter or any other applicable laws, or for fraud or
misrepresentation in the application process.
Section 17.26.100 - Abandonment,
A wireless communication facility is considered abandoned and shall be promptly removed as
provided herein if it ceases to provide wireless communication services for 180 or more days.
Such removal shall be in accordance with proper health and safety requirements and all.
ordinances, rules, and regulations of the City.
A written notice of the determination of abandonment shall be sent by first class mail, or
personally delivered, to the operator of the wireless communication facility at said operator's
business address on file with the City. The operator shall remove all facilities within 30 days
of the date of such notice unless, within 10 business day of the date of said notice, the operator
appeals such determination, in writing, to the Planning Commission. The City Planner shall
schedule a hearing on the matter to be conducted before the Planning Commission at which
time the operator may present any relevant evidence on the issue of abandonment. The
Planning Commission may affirm, reverse, or modify with or without conditions the original
determination of abandonment and shall make written findings in support of its decision. The
decision of the Planning Commission shall be final.
Any wireless communications facility determined to be abandoned and not removed within the
30 day period from the date of notice, or where an appeal has been timely filed, within such time
as prescribed by the Planning Commission following its final determinalion of abandonment,
shall be in violation of this Chapter, and the operator of such facility shall be subject to the
penalties prescribed herein. Facilities determined to be abandoned and not removed within the
time limits prescribed herein hereby are deemed to be a nuisance and, alternative to the
procedure described above, may be at:)ated as a nuisance in any manner provided by law.
(Ordinance 570, 2_/'97)
17,26-5
Mr. James noted that the utility lines are currently on the north side of Highland; however, Caltrans
relocating them and the project will have property on both sides of Highland Avenue, thus they
responsible for both halves. He observed that Mitigation Measure Condition No. 6 requires
e development pay its fair share contribution to traffic militations with respect to the project's
Con, Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis. He explained that Engineering
Conditiol 3 was an intent by the City Engineer to specify that fair share amount and to clarify
that it a cash in lieu deposit. He observed that even if the Commission were to delete
Engineering ition No. 3, the developer would still be responsible for the payment. He stated
that Engineering attempt to be specific on all future projects,
Mr. Coleman indicated
amount was calculated
is not the first time that fee has been required. He noted the fair share
applicant's consultanl and verified by City staff.
Commissioner Mannedno felt
of the full cost of underg
approval with the recommended
;rgrounding as recommended by staff is fair. He felt payment
Highland Avenue should be required, He supported
;s by staff,
Chairman McNiel commented that he
if they were not being required to pay for
sk that the applicant pay for the additional 600 feet
rounding along both sides of Highland Avenue.
Commissioner Mannerino felt that requiring the
good because there would still be another 600 feet
having it be a City project,
~nal 600 feet would not do the City much
would not be undergrounded without
Commissioners Stewart and Tolstoy concurred with C
Mannedno.
Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, to issue a Ne< Declaration for Vesting
Tentative Tract 15871 and adopt the resolutions recommending Victoria Community
Plan Amendment 98-02 and approving "Vesting Tentative Tract 15871 and n review thereof
with modification to require that the developer submit a revised Victoria Plan
incorporating the changes reflected in this project. Motion carried by the
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE - carried
H. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-01- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- A request
to amend the regulations for wireless communication facilities.
Rebecca Van Buren, Association Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel asked if there is a t!imit to 'the number of antennas on a co-location facility.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, indicated the number is unlimited by the ordinance as proposed;
however, there are practical limitations on how many can fit on one monopole because they must
be a certain distance from each other,
Ms. Van Buren indicated the City could require redesign as a stealth facility under the conditional
use permit process.
Planning Commission Minutes
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Joe Richards, land use consultant for Air Touch Cellular, 6529 Riverside Avenue, Suite 115,
Riverside, reported they have had some problems with siting l'acilities. He did not feel the
proposed changes undermine the intent of the code.
Chairman McNiel asked what technology has in store with respect to non-use of monopole. He
said he recently saw a television commercial where someone in the Arctic was using a cell phone,
so the technology exists and is being sold whereby monopole are not necessary,
Mr. Richards replied that he is not that familiar with satellite technology.
Ted Madonelli, 6665 Convoy Court, San Diego, stated he represented Sprint and they are in favor
of the amendment. He said there are other carriers who also take advantage of the facilities. He
felt that it will take another 20 to 30 years. before satellite technology is extensively used.
Mr. Coleman commented that the satellite phones sell for $3,000.
Commissioner Mannerino observed that air time for satellite phones is $8 per minute.
Chairman McNiel asked if the poles will be removed when they are no longer necessary.
Mr. Coleman indicated the ordinance has a provision for removal of abandoned facilities.
Headng no further testimony, Chairman McNiel dosed the public hearing.
Commissioner Mannerino felt there is a need for more cell siles. He favored the amendment.
Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, :seconded by' Mannerino, to adopt the resolution recommending
approval of Development Code Amendmenl 99-01. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL., STEWART, TOLSTOY
NONE
NONE - carried
I. APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 98-27 - An appeal of the City Pla~i¢.:-,;,--
regarding the approval of a 3,283 square foot single family res~idenceqn..the
Residential District (up to 2 dwel ing un ts per acre), located on th¢'nodh sidff.~ ,'>¢~ara Drive,
east of Sapphire Street - APN: 1061-141-47, _
Rudy Zeledon, Assistant Planner, p[esented the sfac-~:p'~d and showed pictures of the site and
the adjacent horse trail con?~.ping overg.r~... c:g~tation and illegal dumping.
Chairman McNiel invited p~;¢-cSmmenL
Planning Commission Minutes
.7,,, April 14, 1999
REiSOLUTIONNO. 99-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND
CHAPTER 17.26 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Code
Amendment No. 99-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of April 199'9, ~he Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said
hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is 'hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically 'finds that a~l of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on April 14, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development. The amendment will offer greater siting opportunities for wireless
communication facilities by aIIowing locations on utility towers, light poles, and additional stealth
facilities to minimize skyline clutter; and
This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The amendment allows
for improved service coverage within the City in a manner which is less obtrusive and visually
obstructive to the community; and
74;
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU'r'tON NO.
DCA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Apdl 14, 1999
Page 2
99-31
do
Code; and
The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that. the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial
evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment
will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is
exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No. 99-01 as
shown in Exhibit "C" of the staff report
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED 'TH~S 14TH DAY OF APRIL 1999.
PLANNING(~MISSION OF THE CITY OF, RANCHO CUCAMONGA
' L....-- ,,"Larry ~4cNiel, Chairman
Al-rEST: Bra'~d~~'~~'~
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of April 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERIN0, MCNIEL,. STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
??
ORDINANCE NO. 601
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI'FY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.26 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES.
A. Recitals.
1. On April 14, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code
Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 99-31, recommending
that the City Council adopt said amendment.
2. On May 5, 1999, the City' Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and
concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development
Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment
identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section
15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: Section 17..26.020 is hereby amended to revise the "Building Mounted" and
"Minor Wireless Communications Facility"' definitions and to add a "Temporary Wireless
Communications Facility" definition:
BUILDING-MOUNTED: means mounted to the side of a building, to the facade of a
building, or to the side of another structure such as a water tank, church steeple,
freestanding sign, utility tower', light pole, or similar structure, but not to include the roof
of any structure.
MINOR WIRELESS COMMU;NICAT_.iON FACILITY: means a wireless communication
facility that is stealth in design and does not exceed the height limit of the district in
which it is located, or building-, facade*, or wall-mounted and does not exceed the height
of the parapet wall or roof li~ne of the building. A roof-mounted facility, which is screened
by a solid material on all four sides and does not exceed 'the maximum height of the
district shall be considered a minor wireless communication facility.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 99-01- CITY OF R.C.
May 5, 1999
Page 2
TEMPORARY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a wireless
communication facility that is kept portable or mobile and deployed while a permanent
facility is under constructiota
SECTION 4:
5.
Section 17.26.030.5 shall be revised to read as follows: ~
Major wireless communications facilities are not permitted to locate within .,~
500 feet of any residential structure, within any residential district, or within
500 feet of any existing, legally established major wireless communication ~¢
facility except as follows: ~l
a. When co..-Ioc:ated o,n the same building, structure, or wireless facility.
The facility replaces or modifies an existing facility for purposes of
co-location.
SECTION 5:
For the purposes of' this. Chapter, all distances shall be measured in a
straight line without regar'd to intervening structures, from the nearest point
of the proposed major wireless communication facility to the nearest property
line of any reside:ntia~ land use, or to the nearest point of another major
wireless communication facility.
Section 17.26.051; shall be added to read as foIIows:
17.26.051 Deployment of Temporary Facility.
A temporary wireless communication facility may be deployed subject to approval
by the City Planner and the following:
A permanent wireless communication facility has been approved for the
property in question.
The temporaw f'aciility was approved as part of the conditional use permit or
minor developmerlt review.
The facility is deployed for' no more than 6 months, provided that two
extensions may be granted by the City Planner; however, the total period
shall not exceed one year.
SECTION 6: If an:/ section,. subsection, sentence, clause;, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or hel:d to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga hereby decla, res that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each
section, subsection, sentence, clauses. phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one
or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be
declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C.
May 5, 1999
Page 3
SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
OR:D"NANCE NO. ~ ~ /
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ClT'Y C:OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA., APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 99-01, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.26 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPM:ENT CODE, REGARDING REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES.
A. Recitals.
1. On April 14, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code
Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 99-31,
recommending that the City Council adopt said amendment.
2. On May 5, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and
concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendmen/to the Development
Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment
identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promuligated thereunder, pursuant to Section
15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: Section 17.26.020 is hereby amended to revise the "Building Mounted" and
"Minor Wireless Communications Facility"' definitions and to add a "Temporary Wireless
Communications Facility" definition:
BUILDING-MOUNTED: means mounted to the side of a building, to the facade of a
building, or to the side o.f another structure such as a water tank, church steeple,
freestanding sign, utility tower, light pole, or similar structure, but not to include the roof
of any structure.
MINOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a wireless communication
facility that is stealth in design and does not exceed the height limit of the district in
which it is located,. or building-, facade-, or waiFmounted and does not exceed the
height of the parapet wall or roof line of the building. A roof-mounted facility, which is
screened by a solid material Orn all four sides and does not exceed the maximum height
of the district shah be considered a minor wireless communication facility.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
[::)CA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C..
May 5, 1999
Page 2
TEMPORARY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY: means a wireless
communication facility that i,,~ kept portable or mobile and deployed while a permanent
facility is under construction..
SECTION 4: Section 17.26..030.4 shall be revised to read as follows:
4. Wireless communications facilities shall be located in the following order of
preference:
a. When co-located on the same building, structure, or wireless facility.
b. '1"'he facility repla. ces or modifies an existing facility for purposes of
co-location,.
c. On existing signali, power, light, or similar kinds of poles.
d. In industrial districts..
e. In comm, ercial districts.
f. In residential districts (minor wireless communications facilities only).
SECTION 5: Section 17.26.051 shall be added to read as follows:
17.26.051 Deployment of Temporary Facility.
A temporary wireless communication facility may be deployed subject to approval
by the City Planner and the following:
1. A permanent wireless communication facility has been approved for the
property in question..
2. The temporary facility was approved as part of the conditional use permit or
minor development review.
3. The facility is deployed for no more than 6 months, provided that two
extensions may be granted by the City Planner; however, the total period
shall not exceed one year.
SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or
legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and
each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any
one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be
declared invalid or unconstitutional or pr'eempted :by subsequent legislation.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C,,
May 5, 1999
Page 3
SECTION 7: The City Clerk shal~ certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin a newspaper of general ci~rculation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
CI'['Y ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
May 5,1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-02 - WILI,.I:/~!Yll I-YON HOMES - A request to amend the Victoria
Community Plan to reduce the Village Commercial land area from approximately
23 acres to 16 acres, and to redesignate approximately 16 acres of land from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)to Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) on a project site consisting of 62.3 acres of land located
southwest of Highland Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-021-03
and 13.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Victoria Community Plan
Amendment 98-02 through adoption of the attached Ordinance and issue a Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this amendment is to restore the Village Commercial land use in the northern portion
of the subject site to its original size (16 acres) as envisioned when the Victoria Community Plan
was adopted in 1981. This adjustment witl provide a 10-acre commercial site on the south side of
Highland Avenue, after its realignment for the freeway, and a 6-acre commercial site on the north
side between Highland Avenue and the freeway off-ramp. The size and shape of the commercial
site on the north side of Highland is pre-determined by freeway and road alignments, and is not
proposed for development at this time. The 10-acre site on the south side is consistent with the
current market trends for neighborhood commercial centers. Most neighborhood commercial
centers are currently utilizing between 7 to 10 acres, which accommodates a large grocery store,
a few ancillary retail shops, and a couple of freestanding restaurant or bank pads.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
VCPA 98-02 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES
May 5, 1999
Page 2
The proposed amendment also rezones approximately 16 acres in the mid-section of the project
site from Medium to Low-Medium Residential, consistent with the 30 acres of Low-Medium
Residential in the southern half of the project site. The Medium designation was intended to support
the commercial area and provide a transit:ion between commercial and low density residential.
However, appropriate transition and buffer strategies may also be accomplished in the design of
a Low-Medium Residential project. Staff feels Low-Medium Residential is appropriate for the project
site.
In conjunction with the proposed amendment, the applicant submitted a Vesting Tentative Tract Map
for the site.
BACKGROUND
On April 14, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed
amendment and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15871. The Commission was satisfied
with the proposed commercial land use size and configuration and the interface with the Low-
Medium residential area. The Com,mission discussed in detail the tract conditions regarding the
under grounding of utilities as applied to this project, and the developer's fair share contribution for
traffic mitigation according to the Congestion Management Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The
Planning Commission recommended approval of the Victoria Community Plan Amendment and
approved the Vesting Tentative Tract map.
CONCLUSION
Staff feels that proposed modifications to the land use districts are consistent and compatible with
surrounding development in the immediate area and in conformance with the goals and objectives
within the Victoria Community Plan and General Plan.
CORRESPONDENCE
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the
property was posted, and notices mailed to all property owners within 300 feet.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:RVB:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
Ordinance
- Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 14, 1999
- Planning Commission Minutes dated April 14, 1999
- Planning Commission Resolution No. 99-28
CiTY ()1: RANClIO CI.tCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
April 14, 1999
TO:
Chairman and Members of' the Planning Commission
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY::
Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-02 - WlLU,AM LYON HOMES - A request to amend the Victoria
Community Plan to reduce the Village Commercial land area from approximately
23 acres to 16 acres, and to redesignate approximately 16 acres of land from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) on a project site consisting of 62.3 acres of land located
southwest of Highland: Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard -APN: 227-021-03
and 13.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15871 -
WILLIAM LYON HOMES - The proposed subdivision and design review of detailed
site plan and elevations for 181 single family lots on 62,3 acres of land in the Low-
Medium Residential Distdct (4~8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community
Rlan, located southwest of Highland Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard -
APN: 227-021-03 and 13.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIOI~¢:
Project Density: 4.75 dwelling units per acre (excludes 24.2 acres that contain commercial
land, Day Creek Boulevard, and Victoria Park Lane)
Surroundinq Land Use and Zonir~:
North - Future Route 30 freeway and vacant land;
South -
East -
West
unincorporated County area pre-
zoned Low Residential (2--4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North
Specific Plan
Vacant land; Low-Medium Residential: (4-8 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria
Community Plan
Vacant land; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria
Community Plan
Utility corridor; Utility Corridor in the Victoria Community Plan
General Plan Designations:
Project Site- Neighborhood Commercial in the northern portion of the site, Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) in the mid-section of the site, and
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) in the southern portion
of the site.
North Low Residential (2-4 dwetlin.g units per acre)
South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
East - Low Residential (2-4 dweilin,g units per acre)
West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871 - WILLIAM LYON
April 14, 1999
Page 2
D.
Site Characteristics: The subject site is 62: acres of vacant land. The site slopes
approximately 4 percent from north to south. The site is bounded by the future Route 30
freeway to the north, vacant land to t~he. south, a utility corridor to the west, and vacant land
to the east that was recently approved for a single family residential subdivision (Tentative
Tract 15875). The site is impacted by various biological, noise, and traffic issues described
in the environmental assessment.
ANALYSIS:
Background: This project was presented to the Planning Commission as a Pre-Application
Review on January 13, 1999 (Exhibit "H"). Since the initial presentation, William Lyon
Homes has redesigned the project to, eliminate residential lots abutting the freeway, to
provide a loop road through the resi:dentiat neighborhood, and to expand the commercial
area to allow secondary access on Day Creek Boulevard. William Lyon Homes has
provided a conceptual master plan, of the commercial site that shows building orientation,
loading area, and access.
General: William Lyon Homes is requesting a modification to the Victoria Community Plan
to reconfigure the size and shape of the Village Commercial land use in the northern portion
of the site and to reduce the density so the entire residential portion of the site would be
Low-Medium Residential.
The Vesting Tentative Tract map includes 181 single family lots, ranging in size from 5,102
to 14,881 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,803 square feet. Forty percent of the
lots have recreational vehicle storage capability as indicated on the Site Plan (Exhibit "D").
The developer is proposing si:x fioo¢ plans, with three elevations each, ranging in size from
1,353 to 2,350 square feet. One plan incorporates a side-on garage.
There are two commercial lots, 9.8 and 6.2 acres respectively, which are not proposed for
development at this time. The res.~idential lots adjoining the commercial area have expanded
side and rear yards to allow the dwellings. to be set back from the commercial property line
from 30 to 60 feet. In addition to the expanded setback, the residential edge includes a
landscaped slope area to differentiate and buffer the land uses. The commercial area will
have a landscaped setback on its side of the line to be determined in a future Conditional
Use Permit.
A "vesting" map means the developer' has the right to process a final map and proceed with
development in substantial compl,iance with the ordinances, policies, and standards in effect
at the time the application is deemed complete.
Victoria Community Plan Amendment: The Victoria Community Plan was originally adopted
in 1981. In 1991, the City amended the Community Plan to rezone approximately 50 acres
of Medium-High Residential to Medium Residential, and 75 acres of Medium Residential to
Low-Medium Residential. Also at that time, William Lyon Homes requested, and the City
approved, an expansion of the commercial area on the subject property to 23 acres: 17
acres on the south side of Highland Avenue after its realignment for the freeway, and 6
acres on the north side, in the triangular site formed between the Highland Avenue frontage
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT'
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871 ~ WILLIAM LYON
April 14, 1999
Page 3
road and the freeway off ramp. Willi:am Lyon Homes provided the following information in
its request to reduce the commercial area back to its original size:
"Commercial developers are downsizing the acreages of neighborhood
shopping centers in light of economic trends relative to the success of the
various entities within a center. in years past, shopping centers were
sized at 15 acres or more to accommodate a large grocery store, a
drugstore, a series of anc.iillary small shops and a few freestanding
financial institutional buildings. With the downsizing that has occurred in
almost all businesses in the early nineties, smaller shopping centers have
also become the norm. Most nei;ghborhood shopping centers currently
utilize from 7 to 10 acres, with a large grocery store,. a few ancillary retail
shops and a couple of freestanding restaurant or bank pads.
Much of the downsizi.ng has happened as a result of: 1) the difficulty to
keep the small ancillary shops fully occupied (and financially successful),
2) the merger of many drugstores, and 3)the consolidation of banks and
savings and loans. Our proposed commercial parcel in Vesting Tentative
Tract Map 15871 has been sized in concert with the. prime commercial
developer that works with Will~iam Lyon Homes by taking into account the
various factors~"
The amendment would reduce the neighborhood commercial area on the south side of
Highland Avenue from 17 acres to 98 acres. The commercial area on the north side
remains the same at 6.2 acres.
The proposed amendment rezones approximately 16 acres in the mid-section of the project
site from Medium to Low-Medium Resi:dential, consistent with the 30 acres of Low-Medium
Residential in the southern half of the project sit.e. The Medium designation was intended
to support the commercial area, and provide a transition between commercial and low
density residential. However, appropriate transition and buffer strategies may be
accomplished in the design of a Low-Medium Residential project. Staff feels Low-Medium
Residential is appropriate for the project site.
Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on
December 1, !998, and February 2, and February 16, 1999 (Exhibit "1"). At the first two
meetings, the Committee had concerns with the interface between the commercial,
residential, and freeway land uses. At the final meeting, the Committee (McNiel, Stewart,
Henderson) reviewed revised plans and a conceptual master plan for the future commercial
site and recommended approval subject to providing parkways between sidewalk and street
(instead of curb adjacent sidewalks).
Technical Review Committee: On ~:ebruary 3,. and March 15, 1999, the Technical Review
Committee reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended special and
standard conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and
ordinances. The Grading Committee reviewed the project on March 16, 1999 and
recommended approval subject to conditions.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT'
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871 - WILLIAM LYON
April 14, 1999
Page 4
There are existing overhead utilities on the north side of Highland Avenue along the project
frontage for this Vesting Tentat:ive Tract. Caltrans has indicated they will relocate said
utilities with the frontage road rolocation, but will not underground them unless funding for
said undergrounding is provided. The conditions of approval require the developer to
complete the undergrounding upon development of either commercial property fronting
Highland Avenue. Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96 (Exhibit "K") states that
undergrounding shall extend to the first pole off-site from each project boundary or across
the street for corner properties. A footnote indicates rights-of-way for railroads, channels,
etc., shall be treated like streets. Between this development and the next developable
property fall rights-of-way for Rocihest:er Avenue, San Bernardino County Flood Control
District, and Southern California Edison. The condition currently states that undergrounding
limits are from the east side of Day Creek Boulevard to the west side of Day Creek Channel.
The developer has requested that they be allowed to pay an in-lieu fee for half the amount
of the unit cost times the length of theiir project frontage from the center of Day Creek
Boulevard to the west tract boun.dary. Staft believes the developer should be responsible
for the full cost of undergrounding within the project limits but would appreciate Planning
Commission policy direction regarding how far to go off site.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The site i,s impacted by various biological, noise, traffic, and
school issues. In order to complete the Initiel Study pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), the developer prepared detailed reports and made plan revisions to address issues,
including:
Bioloqicah The property contains coastal sage scrub, which is an area identified as potential
habitat for endangered or threaten.ed species~ As a result, habitat assessment and
biological protocol surveys were required to determine potential impaots, particularly to the
federally-listed threatened California gnatcatcher and the endangered San Bernardino
kangaroo rat. Both the. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish
and Game were consulted on March 26, 1998 and January 5, 1999. The habitat
assessment and protocol surveys were conducted by BonTerra Consulting in March through
May 1998 by biologists permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. A spring survey was
also conducted on July 2, 1998 to determine if any sensitive plant species were located on
the project site. The report indicates the ~habitat on-site is not occupied by either of the two
endangered species pursuant to, sufYeys conducted acco,rding to U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service protocol. The report concludes the dominant plant species on the site are
considered non-sensitive. One special interest plant, Parry's spine flower, was observed
on the project site. The report indicates this species are on a review list and are not
considered to be a sensitive species, which would require mitigation.
The site is located south of the futur,e Route 30 freeway, in an urbanized area, which is
heavily impacted by' suburban activities (traffic, light and glare, human contact, and
household pets). The subject property does not have potential to be included in a multi-
species habitat conservation plan or to be instrumental in reserve design.
tt should be noted that in February 1998, a BonTerra biologist observed an incidental
sighting of a pair of California Gnatcatchers outside of the project's boundaries, northeast
of the site. Yet the California gnatcatcher was not found on the subject site during field visits
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871 - WILLIAM LYON
April 14, 1999
Page 5
and protocol surveys conducted in March and April of the 1998. No evidence of nests or
nesting was observed on the subject site during field visits. It is therefore presumed that the
species does not occupy the subj,ect site. There appears to be high quality sage scrub
habitat nodh of the project site (north of the future Route 30 freeway), which may have
preservation potential and which may' be occupied by the sighted pair of California
gnatcatchers.
Noise: The project will be impacted by traffic noise from the future Route 30 freeway and
Day Creek Boulevard. A noise study (Mestre Greve Associates, October 1998) prepared
for the project recommends a 6-,foot high sound attenuation wall and building upgrades for
perimeter lots along the northern, and eastern boundaries to mitigate traffic noise associated
with the freeway and Day Creek Boulevard. With the design review of the Tentative Tract,
the site was redesigned to shift the residences further from the freeway. The sound wall will
be shifted in congruence with the residential portion of the projecL The conditions of
approval require the developer to provide sound attenuation walls and building upgrades
pursuant to recommendations in a final noise study.
Traffic: Since the project involves ~'educing commercial acreage and lowering residential
densities in the Victoria Community Plan, traffic impacts are expected to be less than
impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report for the Victoria Community Plan.
Nonetheless, the San Bernardino Associate Governments (SANBAG) required a Congestion
Management Program Traffic ~mp,.ac:t Analysis (TIA) for the project because of the
commercial portion. The TIA (RKJK and Associates, March 15, 1999) identifies and
analyzes impacts on the transportation system. The TIA recommends traffic mitigation to
include constructing Day Creek; Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Highland Avenue;
installing traffic signals, bus turnouts and bus stops; and contributing towards necessary off-
site improvements on a fair share or pro.-rata basis.
The perimeter streets fronting the project site are involved in several construction projects
at this time. SAN BAG is preparin,g to realign Highland Avenue in conjunction with the Route
30 freeway project4 A City project to complete portions of Day Creek Boulevard as a detour
route during freeway construction is also. in progress at this time. Third, Kaufman and Broad
will be constructing the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and portions of Victoria Park Lane
in conjunction with their Summerfield project (Tract 15875) possibly at the same time as
William Lyon Homes The conditions of approval require the developer to provide for the
completion of public improvements after SANBAG and City construction as determined by
the City Engineer.
Schools: The Vesting Tentative Tract application was deemed complete after the
November 1998 amendment to Stale law (S.B 50) regarding school mitigation. Therefore,
the project will be subject to school mitigation in accordance with the new State law.
Essentially, the school districts are r'eeva:luatin,g the fee structure upon issuance of building
permits for mitigation in lieu of the previously required Mello-Roos Community Facilities
District for construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. The developer's
signature on the initial Study Part II agrees to comply with current state law.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871 - WILLIAM LYON
April 14, 1999
Page 6
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of
Victoria Community Plan Amendment 9,8-02 to the City Council and approve Vesting Tentative Tract
15871, including design review, through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval, and issue
a mitigated Negative Declaration for the project
Resp fu ,~~-----~ itted,
/ .-
City Planner
BB:RVB:mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
Exhibit "D"
Exhibit "E"
Exhibit "F"
Exhibit
Exhibit "H"
Exhibit "1"
Exhibit "J"
Exhibit "K"
Resolution
Resolution
Resolution
Site Utilization Map and Existing Land Use Districts
Proposed :Lam'l Use Districts
Tentative Tract Map
Site Plan
Conceptual Grading Plan
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Elevations
Planning Commission Workshop Minutes dated January 13, 1999
Design Review Committee Action Comments
Initial Study Part 11
- Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96 Re Undergounding
Recommending Approval for Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-02
of Approval for V:esting Tentative Map 15871
of Approval for Design Review
U~
b~sT~CT5
_UNIT MIX
LOT8 1-71] &. 107-10__9
~NT B1 U'4T B~ LNT B3
UNiT TABULATJON_
_LOTS 1-78 & 107-~9
LOTS__r .79-106 & !!O- 181 m,,.,~.w~
~fi ~ v~Y ~ ~
~LAND USE SUMMARY
LOT "lB3
LOT ~,2
LOTS 1-1~1 (5.000 ~ ~ LO~
DAY ~
~T~ P~
TOT~
6.0 AC~IES
3.~3 ACREs
5.8 ACI~S
2.4 AC~S
82_3 ACRES
t,.4~1 SF
5.102 ~
LAJq,GESTPaE~LOT
StuIALLESTI:ESJ)E],,fTJALLOT
AV~:JLAGEREEZ~(~ITL~LLOT
LOTS 79-106 & 110-181
I.!',I'T gl [.NT D2
20,60 SF
6
T~DVT4/'/VE
all. ,4~o al~
GROUP. INC.
iV/DS
I'EArI',4 77V£
TRACT
TEC~A L
8
~1 RJM
MDS'::.-'_;::'L'.ff.
FIVE
r l RJM
DI~IGN G~OUP, INC.
~¥'~m bm Homes, Inc.
rlIt J"'!
MDS .............
7't5s~ FIVE
TP.A ¢ 7'
NO.
-,!
-i
-iII J .',1
?7:
MOS '"' .........
W'fl]iam L~m ttom~,
Ft~rI'A 77VE
FRACT
t
W'dliam I~ Ibmes, Inc.
MD $ %% '-'=" 7 ~
7E~VTA TIVE
oo
-t
0
o
o
o
o
o
-I RJ M
DL~R;N GROUp.
TENTATIVE
TRACT
NO. 15871
PRELIMINARY
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
IJ,~iGN GROUt'. INC
TENTA TI
TRACT
NO. 15871 ~.,,.,~,,~ ~^..~,
PRELIMINA R Y ......
LAND.5'CAPE ~.~
PLAN
INC
TEN TA TI VE
THACT
NO. lS~?l
PR£I. IMINAR ~ ......
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
TENTATIVE
TRACT
NO. 15871
PR£LI~HNAR
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
P LA NN
VICTORIA
WILLIAM
T R A
IN G AREA X
VINEYARDS NORTH
LYON HOMES. INC.
C T ~ I 5 8 7 1
,
W-I- C
PLAN 1
PLANNING AREA X
VICTORIA VINEYARDS NORTH
WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.
T R A C T # 1 5 8 7 I
P LA N N
VICTORIA
WILLIAM
T R A
PLAN 2 ELEVATION C
I N G AREA ~
VINEYARDS NORTH
LYON HOMES, INC.
C T tt ! 5 8 7 I
PLAN 2
PLANNING AREA X
VICTORIA VINEYARDS NORTH
WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.
T R A C T # 1 5 8 7 1
PLAN 2
WITH DECK OPTION
PLANNING AREA X
VICTORIA VINEYARDS NORTH
WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.
T R A C T # 1 5 8 7 1
PLAN 3 ELEVATION C
VICTORIA VINEYA RT ~
WILLIAM LYON HO 'I
T R A C T # I
PLAN 3
PLANNING AREA X
VICTORIA VINEYARDS NORTH
~VILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.
T R A C T # 1 5 8 7 1
PLAN 3
WITH DECK OPTION
PLANNING AREA X
VICTORIA VINEYARDS NORTH
WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.
T R A C T # 1 5 8 7 1
B
1
VICTORIA WINDROWS
WILLIAM LYON HOMES
E~r~~'r "~-?"
VICTORIA WINDROWS
R.A~CI IO CUC.)~4ON(~A. CALIFORNIA
".¥1LLIA~ LYON HOMES
Ex, N ~BI T' '" 6,-~ 0"
1
VICTORIA WINDROWS
R..M',,/C I IO CU,CA~ONOA.. CALI F'OR/',,I IA
WILLIAM LYON HOMES
C
2
! !l E! II . ~I
VICTORIA WINDROWS
RANClIO C:UCAMONGA. CALIFORN£A
WILLIAM LYON HOMES
XH ~B iT "G-I'z~'
2A
VICTORIA WINDROWS 3
R..,~"iCI I0 C'rj,C,~MONO,/k C~LIFOI:I~I^
WILLIAM LYON HOMF~
C
//
VICTORIA WINDROWS
RANClIO CI~C~MONO& C.,M~I ¥Ol~N I^
WILLIAM LYON HOM£$
3A
//
PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW' 98-10 .. WILLIAM LYON HOMES - Consideration of land use
and circuration alternatives for62 acres of land,. located southwest of Highland Avenue and
future Day Creek Boulevard in the V'ictoria Community Plan - APN: 227-021-03 and 13.
Brad Buller, City Planner', explained the history of the project. He reported the Design Review
Committee reviewed the related Vic~,oria Plan Amendment and Vesting Tentative Tract Map and
indicated concerns with land use compatibility and circulation issues, He said the Committee
recommended a workshop with the Planning Comrnission. Mr, Bullet identified the location of the
site and the surrounding uses. He presented an overview of the current Victoria Plan, the
proposal presented to the Design Review Committee, and the Committee's concerns. He stated
the applicant has been working with staff to develop alternative land use and circulation concepts,
which were posted on the display board, He said Ihe applicant would describe the concepts.
Cad Morabito, William Lyon Homes, initeduced himself and members of the development team,
Slan Morse and Larry Ryan. Mr. Morabito stated that in attempts to mitigate the conflicts between
the residential and commercial land uses, the team decided to explore a plan which eliminales the
10-acre commercial site altogether (a plan showing all Low-Medium residential south of Highland).
He presented two versions of this concept, having slight changes in fhe cul-de-sac arrangements
along the loop roads, He said once thiis concept was drawn, William Lyon Homes, being a
residential builder, became more interested in seeing if this plan has merit with the City.
Mr. Morabito presented the second and lhird concepts, both of which include Low-Medium
residential for the lower two-thirds of the site and a commercial component across the upper third
of the site (no residential abutling the freeway). One concept indicated single family homes lhal
rear-on the commercial site; the other' corlcep[ indicaled a mixlure of lots that side-on and rear-on
to the commercial sile.
Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner. staled the fiirst concept which eliminates the commercial
area obviously eliminates Ihose land use conflicts, and the new street design addresses slaff
concerns. She suggested that if the PJanning Commission had objections to eliminating the
commercial area, it would be helpful to know at this time. She said the other two concepts retain
the commercial area and would include a slope between residential and commercial, which would
be maximized to enhance the buffer.. Ms, Van Buren requesled cl'arificalion on whether there is
a preference for homes to side-on or i"ear.on, noting there are different advantages to each; i.e.,
side-on allows fewer lots to be impacted by the commercial while rear-on may allow greater
slopes.
Mr. Buller outlined the location of other commercial sites along the fulure freeway corridor.
Commissioner Macias thought the concepts presented showed great progress since the proposal
he saw at the Design Review Committee,, He felt the commercial area should be retained.
Commissioner Tolstoy said there is an opportunity to use the commercial area to buffer the
residential neighborhood from the freeway, He did not like placing houses against the freeway,
He expressed concern with the long, narrow shape of the commercial area, and questioned if the
backs of the commercial building.,; wi,II be facing residential, leading to possible noise/loading
problems. He advised the developer to rrlake the size and shape of the commercialarea right
from the beginning and avoid conflicts such; as the loading problems.
Commissioner Mannedno stated he preferred the concepl with a combination of side and rear-on
residential to commercial.
PC Adjourned Minutes
tB IT' "'
-3- January 13, 1999
Commissioner Stewart agreed the c:~r;~rnmercial area should be retained. She advised the
developer to take a close look at loading noise issues and look carefully at slopes and grades
between uses.
Commissioner McNiel expressed corlcems with the natural short-cuts through the tract by
unwanted traffic. He agreed with Commissioner Mannedno regarding the combination of side-on
and rear-on residential to commercial and thought technical issues could be worked out. He felt
the commercial center should be retain. ed.
Mr. Bullet noted thai this may be the first commercial site wilh the opportunity to look towards the
future freeway; however, the issues of loading and noise must be addressed. Mr. Butler
concluded there is a preference [o retain the commercial area and proceed with the Committee
Review process.
Mr. Morabito lhar~ked the Commission for its time and comments.
PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 98-11 - CATELLUS - The proposed master plan for
development of "Rancho Cucamo,nga Corporale Park," a 140 ac. ze commercial and ind~
~mplex in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and General Industrial (Subarea 8) Di of
ndustr~al Area Specific Plan, and including a shopping center anchored a home
im store, to be located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulev. and Arrow
Route 229-011-25, 31, arid 32.
Brad Bullet, City
and indicated that
~er, explained the purpose and goals of Ihe Pre-Appli Review process
compJex.~ty c,Ir the ,project, extra time would be )vided for the meeting.
Pamela Steele, the a
basic aspects of Ihe master
i:r~lLroduced lho Catellus d~ )mont loam, reviewed the
and outJir'~ed what they hop( accomplish at the meeting.
Chades McPhee, Catelrus re
how Catellus develops land.
reviewed the
)ated land uses and the nature of
Chades, Lamb, the project landscape
intent to unify the master planned devel,
the landscape and street scape design
Dennis Hill, project architect, reviewed
throughout the project.
nd mix of architectural design features
Don Winn, Lowe's re
size requirements.
described the
,le of business, operation, and
Brent Le Count, Asso, Planner, iindicaled that staff's 'ould be presented in
accordance with provided by the applicant. He observed the district
boundary betwee .~bareas 7 and 8 al.on.g the proposed public street is wilh the
flexibility built the Industrial Area Spec~ific Plan and makes good planning ;e. Given that
land uses n the northeast comer of the maslor plan area are the least defined asked the
Commiss preference on how dov'efopment if1 this area relate to Mast Plaza, Foothill ~levard,
and th, owe's buildings. He observed that loading areas for the Lowe's project and r'~PUr
industrial buildings should be carefully treated given the proximity to Milliken Avenue."4d~Le
how the large industrial building at the southeast corner of Iho master plan relates t~
PC Adjourned Minutes
11'
January 13,1999
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:10 p.m.
Rebecca Van Buren
February 16, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN!:) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15871 LYON - The
proposed subdivision and design review of detailed site plan and elevations for 182 single family lots
on 62 acres of land in the Low-Medium Resi,dential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria
Community Plan, located southwest of Hi:ghland Avenue and the future Day Creek Boulevard -
APN: 227-021-03 and 13.
Background: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on February 2, 1999, and indicated
it could support the residential podion but had significant concerns regarding the commercial area.
The applicant is revising the commercial area to increase frontage on Day Creek Boulevard and will
provide a new conceptual commercial master plan for the Committee's review. The revised plan will
be delivered to the Committee members as soon as it is completed (probably February 10, 1999).
Staff Recommendation:
A staff recommendation will be made at the meeting after staff has had an opportunity to study the
revised plans.
Attachment: DRC Action Comments dated February 2, 1999
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart,, Larry Henderson
Staff Planner:
Rebecca Van Bu,ren
The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Henderson) reviewed the revised plan indicating an expanded
commercial area with access on Day Creek and 183 residential lots. The Committee recommended
approval subject to providing parkway sidewal'k.s instead of curb adjacent in the residential tract.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
9:00 p.m.
Rebecca Van Buren
February 2, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15871 - LYON - The
proposed subdivision and design review of detailed site plan and elevations for 182 single family
lots on 62 acres of iand in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the
Victoria Community Plan, located southwest of Highland Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard -
APN: 227-021-03 and 13.
Desiqn Parameters: The subject site is 62 acres with the future Route 30 freeway to the north, an
extension of Victoria Park Lane to the south, an Edison utility corridor to the west, and future Day
Creek Boulevard to the east, The current Victoria Community Plan designates the northern section
as Village Commercial, the mid-section as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), and
the lower section as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). William Lyon Homes
desires to reduce the size of the commercial area from approximately 15 acres to 9 acres and to
"downzone" the residential portion from medium density to low-medium density.
Backqround: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on December 1, 1998, and
recommended the applicant present different design strategies at a Planning Commission
workshop. The Planning Commission conducted a workshop on January 13, 1999. !n response to
comments received at the workshop, the applicant has made substantial revisions to the plans.
Major changes include:
· The commercial area is retained along the entire Highland Avenue frontage (there are no
dwellings abutting the future freeway);
A landscape slope separates the commercial from the residential land use. There is a
combination of dwellings which side-or~ and rear-on to the commercial area. Dwellings that
side-on to the commercial area have a 30.~45 foot side yard,
· A Conceptual Site Plan is shown for'a future neighborhood commercial center, indicating the
orientation of a market and pad sites.
· The street layout re-instates the "loop road concept" for Silverberry Road illustrated in the
Victoria Community Plan (in a modified form).
· The developer is proposing 6 floor plans, with 3 elevations each, ranging in size from 1,353 to
2,350 square feet. One floor plan incorporates a swing-in garage.
Staff Comments: The following comrnen, ts are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
The commercial site will have its access points along Highland Avenue. It does not have
enough frontage on Day Creek Boulevard to, allow a driveway on this street. Another 80 to 100
feet in frontage would be needed to provide for a driveway on Day Creek Boulevard.
DRC COMMENTS
TT 15871 - LYON
February 2, 1999
Page 2
Side and rear elevations should be enhanced to provide 360 degree architectural treatment.
Special attention should be given, to lots that rear-on to Day Creek Boulevard.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major" issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Buffer strategies between commercial and residential, such as slope plantings, decorative wall
treatment, sound attenuation walls.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion::
A minimum 5-foot wide landscape area should be provided between the back of sidewalk and
any walls in corner side yard situations to breakup the massing of the walls and minimize
graffiti potential. Corner side yard walls should be shiffed to provide a 5-foot wide landscape
area between the back of sidewalk and the walls per Planning Commission policy.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the
project subject to the modifications as recomme~nded above.
Attachments: Design Review Comments for December 1, 1998 including: Exhibit "A"-. Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Current C;ircula~ion Plan for Victoria Planned Community
Exhibit "C" - Current Land Uses for Site
Exhibit "D" - Proposed' Land Uses for Site
Planning Commission Workshop Minutes dated January 13, 1999
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, and Larry Henderson
Staff Planner: Rebecca Van Buren
Staff informed the Committee that the applicant agreed to address the side and rear elevations. The
applicant presented upgraded side and rear elevations for the product types. The applicant stated
they feel the commercial site is adequate in size and viable without access on Day Creek
Boulevard. The applicant stated that they have been working wit'h Nadel who have commercial
expertise to design the site with the acreage, frontage, and access needed for a market/drugstore/
neighborhood center. The Nadel representative responded to questions regarding the commercial
center acreage, access, and overall viability. Nadel felt the commercial site was viable with access
on Highland Avenue only, and not on Day Creek Boulevard.
The Committee (Stewart, McNiel, Henderson) reviewed the project. T:he Committee indicated that
it was generally satisfied with the resident:iat street system and buffering strategy between the
residential and commercial land uses. It stated it: could support the residential portion subject to the
proposed modifications, including:
EzHd IT "I-5"
DRC COMMENTS
TT 15871 ~ LYONS
February 2, 1999
Page 3
Enhance side and rear elevations to include surrounds on all window and door openings (high
density foam - minimum 4 pounds), shutters, pot shelves, and gable-end detailing. Rear
elevations facing Day Creek Boulevard shall include a mixture of second-story pop-outs and
second-story decks.
Modify front porch columns on Plan 2 (Bassen an-Lagon Architects) to provide greater
distinction between styles.
3. Concentration of driveways at Street C cul-de-sac to be modified to reduce paving.
However, the Committee did state that they continue to have concerns regarding the commercial
portion. The Committee felt access on Day Creek Boulevard appears to be key to make the site
commercially viable. The Committee continue:s to question if the gross acreage, net acreage, and
access will allow for a viable neighborhood commercial center. The Committee recommended the
applicant revisit the conceptual commercial master plan and expand frontage on Day Creek
Boulevard to address these concerns.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:40 p.m
Rebecca Van Buren
December 1, 1998
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02 - LYON
- A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan to redesignate approximately 20 acres of land from
Village Commercial and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) on a project :site consisting of 62 acres of land located southwest of
Highland Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-021-03 and 13.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND .VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15871 LYON - The
proposed subdivision and design review of detailed site plan and elevations for 188 single family lots
on 62 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria
Community Plan, located southwest of Highlar~d Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-
021-03 and 13.
Design Parameters: The subject site is 62 acres with the future Route 30 freeway to the north, an
extension of Victoria Park Lane to the south, an Edison utility corridor to the west, and future Day
Creek Boulevard to the east. The current Victoria Plan designates the northern section as Village
Commercial, the mid-section as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), and the lower
section as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). William Lyon Homes desires to
reduce the size of the commercial area and shift its location to orient toward Day Creek Boulevard.
The developer is also requesting to "downsize" the residential portion of the site to the low-medium
density.
Staff Comments: The proposed project is being presented to Design Review Committee for
discussion of broad land use and circulation issues only~ Because land use and circulation affect
subdivision design, staff believes that Committ.ee should provide direction to the applicant on the
identified land use and circulation issues, ,prior to reviewing the subdivision and house designs, Once
the subdivision is designed to follow the direct:ion of the Committee, staff will schedule the project
(subdivision and house design) for another meeting. The following are issues based on the proposed
land use and circulation:
Single family residential use next ~o a commercial land use and future freeway at the
northwestern portion of the site.
The proposal to place single family homes next to commercial land use and the future
freeway will create land use cor'~fiicts. Examples of conflicts according to the Land Use
Matrix of the Development Code are; noise, odors, light, shadow, aesthetics, safety, etc.,
and as shown in Exhibit "F." The Land Use Matrix also stated that these conflicts need
to be mitigated or avoided. Commercial land use next to a freeway is appropriate because
the land use is generally less harmed by freeway impacts and may derive certain benefits
from the exposure (easy acoess, visibility). During the 1991-review of Victoria Planned
Community land uses, this area was specifically discussed where the Village Commercial
designation was reaffirmed for that reason, and as shown in Exhibit "C."
The proposal to have single famiiiy homes along Highland Avenue will convert most of
Highland Avenue from privately maintained commercial frontage to publicly maintained
landscaped area because of single family residential rear-ons. The increase of publicly
maintained area will place additional burdens on already the most expensive Landscape
Maintenance District (LMD)..
DRC COMMENTS
VCPA 98-02 & TT 15871 - LYON
December 1, 1998
Page 2
The Circulation Plan of the Victoria Community Plan (Exhibit "B") shows two existing streets,
Silverberry and Sugar Gum, extending west of Day Creek Boulevard then Iooping south and
north respectively, to meet at a four-way intersection with Victoria Park Lane. The applicant
proposed to eliminate the southbound loop road that intersect Victoria Park Lane and instead
loop northbound to intersect Highland Avenue.
The proposed circulation as shown in Exhibit "E" does not provide a strong collector spine
that serves and enhances a. sense of residential neighborhoods and reduces through
traffic.
Staff is especially concerned with the northbound loop road where the residential
neighborhood in the northwestern portion of the site must share the same "collector" street
with the future commercial area. The subdivision/circulation design requires houses to be
side-on to the collector street:. This may generate neighborhood complaints of truck traffic
maneuvering in and out of the commercial site and may present challenges to provide
screening and noise attenuatio,n of loading areas. Staff believes that alternative street
systems which allow residential uses to rear-on the commercial site may provide better
means to deal with interface conflicts. Staff wifl present a concept of an alternative street
system layout as basis for discussion at the meeting. Copies of the concept will be made
available to the applicant.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee provide direction
regarding land use and circulation issues so that: the applicant may prepare development plans that
follow Design Review Committee directions,, which will be submitted for further Design Review
Committee review.
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Location MaF:,
Exhibit "B" - Current Circulation Plan for Victoria Planned Community
Exhibit "C" - Current Land Uses for Site
Exhibit "D" - Proposed Land Uses for Site
Exhibit "E"- Proposed Stree. l System for Site
Exhibit "F" - Land Use Mat:ri;,::., ~Table 17.08~050-F
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Larry McNiel, Rich Macia~s, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner:
Rebecca Van Buren
The Committee reviewed the proposed la~'~d: use and circulation concepts presented by the applicant
and the alternative concepts presented by staff The Committee expressed concerns with the
applicant's proposed land use and circulation concepts as listed below. The Committee directed the
applicant to review and respond to the ,alternative concepts introduced by staff. The Committee
recommended the applicant obtain directi;on on land use at a Planning Commission workshop. The
following list the Committee's concerns:
The most effective buffer bet:ween r'esidential and commercial land uses is needed. The
proposed northerly collector loop road with residential lots side-on to the commercial site would
create land use conflicts
2. The subdivision and circulation should be designed to deter potentially hazardous traffic short-
cuts and enhance the sense of neighborhoods.
DRC COMMENTS
VCPA 98-02 & TT 15871 - LYON
December 1, 1998
Page 3
The Committee questioned the appropriateness and the adequacy of the size and orientation
of the 10+/-acre commercial site in terms of providing reasonable building envelopes, access,
truck maneuvering, landscaping, screening, and buffering the residential use. A conceptual site
plan of the commercial area should be p~rovided at the Planning Commission workshop..
The applicant agreed to analyze the different design strategies and present options at a workshop to
be scheduled with the next available Planning Commission meeting.
' CO,' 98 02 anc 587'
0.5
0,5 Miles
ton
ExH 115r~'
Neighborhood streets which serve individual neighborhoods
will not be through streets, but will be cul-de-sacs or loop
roads to reduce through traffic and enhance the sense of
neighborhood. J--S~~
The diagram below illustrates the inte~ of the residenti~.l
circulation.
LocaJ
"I-9"
F~EVI.~ED DATE
!
~ d
LLJ
TENTATIVE
": :,r . ....
TRACT
DIgSIGN GROUP, INC.
/,~/
NO. 15871
Rancho Cucamonga Devetopme~t Code Section ] 7. 08. 050
Table 17,08,,050-F - Land Use Conflicts
This Matrix shows the
conflicts which are
likely to arise between
Land Uses. These
musl be either
mitigaled or avoided.
Lard Uses
Active [gecreohon
Pes~denhal
Low Density
Mode rate
Density
H~gh Density
Inst~lut~OnOI
Office/Bus~ness
Commerc~(~
Inolustr~ol
~o~Jrood
Porksrig LOtS
~roort oho
,:1 tg,~,t ~c"~*~'r
Coliector Street
,~r ter~ol Stree?
Use Conflicts
o
0 o
Tyc)e$ Oi '~'~)oflicts,
~/.,. no~se, ocJor.'~hL
[~' ShOdOw
%;~ aesthetics
jjJ~ privOCy
octess
1 7 08-33
3t95
i55
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
INITIAL STUDY PART II
BACKGROUND
1. Project File: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-02 & Vesting Tentative Tract 15871
2. Related Files: Not applicabl.e.
Description of Project: VICTOR!A COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02 - A request
to amend the Victoria Community Plan to reduce the Village Commercial land area from
approximately 23 acres to 16 acres, and to redesignate approximately 16 acres of land from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelting units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) on a project site consisting of 62.3 acres of land, located southwest of
Highland Avenue and the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN:: 227-021-03 and 13.
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT :15,871 - The proposed subdivision and design review of a
detailed site plan and elevations for 18t single family lots on 62.3 acres of land in the Low-
Medium Residential District (4-tB dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Community Plan,
located southwest of Highland Avenue and the future Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 227-021-
03 and 13
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Carl Morabito
William Lyon Homes, Inc.
4490 Von Karman Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92660
General Plan Designation: Nei,ghborhood Commercial in the northern portion of the site,
Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) in the mid-section of the site, and
Low-Medium Density Residentiall (4-8 dwelling units per acre) in the southern portion of the
site.
Zoning: The project is within the following districts in the Victoria Community Plan: Village
Commercial in the northern portion of t,he site, Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre) in the mid-section of the site, and Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) in the southbern portion of the site.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The subject site is 62 acres of vacant land. To the
north is the future Route 30 Freeway, Construction began on the freeway in 1998 and is
expected to be completed in the year 2002. To the south, the developer will install an
extension of Viictoria Park Lane, a linear park in the Victoria Community Plan. Further south
is vacant land zoned for Low-Medium Residential land use. To the west is the Edison utility
corridor which will remain as permanent open space~ To the east is the future Day Creek
Boulevard, a major divided arterial which will be constructed with this project. Further east
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
is vacant land (a former utility corridor) which was recently approved for a residential
subdivision (TT 15875) in the LowsMedium Residential district.
Lead Agency Name and Address::
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91'73(111,
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner
(909) 477-2750
10.
Other agencies whose approval is required:
San Bernardino Associate Governments (SANBAG)
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless
Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the
following pages.
(X) Land Use and Planning
( ) Population and Housing
( ) Geological Problems
(X) Water
( ) Air Quality
(X) Transportelionl;C irculalion
(X) Biological Resources
( ) Energy and Mineral Resources
( ) Hazards
(X) Noise
( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance
(X) Public Services
(X) Utilities and Service Systems
( ) Aesthetics
( ) Cultural Resources
( } Recreation
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
()
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
(x)
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have b.een added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
()
I find that the proposed project MAY ha, vea significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
()
I find that the proposed project MAY lhave a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2} has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 3
Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that
remain to be addressed.
()
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects
1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
2) have been avoided or m:itigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Signed:
Rebecca Van Buren
Associate Planner
March 15, 1999
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACTS
Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California f~nvironmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation
is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact, .... Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to
mitigate the significant effects identified.
d)
LAND USE AND PLANNING. i/I/ould the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with .jurisdiction over
the project? () ( ) () (X)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? () ( ) ( ) (X)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a)
The project involves an arnendment to the Victoria Community Plan to reduce the
commercial acreage and t,o lower the resi,dential density. The tentative map and
community plan amendment are being processed concurrently and are internally
consistent. The proposed project is generally consistent with the land uses shown for
this site in the adopted General Pl~an. A review of the City's General Plan Land Use
Plan indicates that the northern portion of the site is designated Commercial, the mid-
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 4
section is Medium Residential, and the southern portion is Low-Medium Residential.
The defined boundary between commercial and residential uses has some flexibility
to allow for various street layouts, buffer strategies, and minor adjustments in the
location of land uses. The project retains 16 acres of future commercial land in the
northern portion. The remainder of the site is residential. The bulk of the smaller lots
(5,000 to 7,000 square feet in size) are located in the mid-section of the site, and most
of the larger lots (7,000 to 10~000 square feet) are located in the southern portion of
the site, which is generally consistent with the Medium and Low-Medium General Plan
designations.
Poienfi&lly
~mp~l
IJsuell and Supporllng Intornlal~on Sou~cea S~lnE~.~nt S~lndlcanl No,
...................... impact impact Impact
POPULATION AND HOUSING,, Would the proposal;
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? () ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either' directly
or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? (} () ( ) (X)
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaking?
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche hazards?
e) Landslides or mudflows?
f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land';'
h) Expansive soils?
I) Unique geologic or physical features?
Impecl Lell
Pot.lint,allyUn/,~lla Than
( ) ( ) () (x)
() ( ) ( ) (x)
('r) ( ) ( ) (X)
( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
() ( ) ( ) (x)
() () () (x)
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 5
S~ndicen~
Md~IIK~
d)
e)
g)
h)
i)
Polefi(lllll~
................ Impa~ Impa,c~ Impa~
WATER. Will the proposal result
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of sudace water runoff? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
b) Exposure of people or properly to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of
sudace water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved
oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements? () ( ) ( ) (X)
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or w~thdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations,
or through substantial loss of groundwater
recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Altered direction or rate of' flow of' groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Impacts to groundwater qu, ah~y ~ ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater othe~ise available for public water
supphes ~, (~} ( ) () (X)
Comments:
a)
The absorption rate will be attered because of the paving and hardscape proposed.
All runoff will be conveyed to approved drainage facilities which have been designed
to handle the flows.
b) There are no special flood hazard areas within or near the project site.
e)
The project will not alter the course or direction of water movements. Surface runoff
currently reaching the site from off-site areas will be conveyed to approved drainage
facilities which have been designed to handle the flows.
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
a)
b)
c)
d)
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 6
and Sul:;~po~ling lr~formabo,n SOMr~S NO
................. Impact
QUALITY. Would the proposaL"
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate'";' ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Pot~liy
Imp~l
c)
d)
e)
0
g)
Potentially Th443
I~t~u~l ~ Su11>¢~1~'~1 Inton'tlalbon So~rc~e, $~{Ind'lcalnt S~lnd~-.~'~NO
........ Imp~ Impact Impecl
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION., Wou/d the
proposa/ resu/t in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or b'affic congestion? ( ) (X) ( ) ( )
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)'? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
Insufficient parking capacity oresite or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? () ( ) ( ) (X)
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Rail or air traffic impacts? () ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
a)
The project will not increase ve, hicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projections
for the adopted land use for which the street widths were evaluated at a build-out
condition, The project will be required to install frontage street improvements in their
ultimate configuration, per City Ordinance, and to pay Transportation Development
Fees.
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 7
Since the project involves reducing commercial acreage and lowering residential
densities in the Victoria Community Plan, traffic impacts are expected to be less than
impacts identified in the EtR for t,he Victoria Community Plan. Nonetheless, the San
Bernardino Associate Governments (SANBAG) requires a Congestion Management
Program (CMP) Traffic Impact A.nalysis (TIA) for the project. The applicant submitted
a TIA, dated March 15, 1999, prepared by RKJK and Associates, which identifies and
analyzes impacts on the transportation system~ The following recommendations
set forth in the TIA report shall be mitigation measures required through
conditions of approwll:
1)
Construct Day Creek Boulevard from the north project boundary to
Victoria Park Lane, at: its ultimate half-section width, as a major divided
arterial.
2)
Construct Victoria Park Lane from the west project boundary to Day Creek
Boulevard, at its ultimate half-section width, as a collector.
3)
Construct Highland Avenue from the west project boundary to Day Creek
Boulevard at its ultimate cross-section width.
4)
Install traffic signals along Day Creek Boulevard at the intersections of
Victoria Park Lane, Silverberry Street, and Highland Avenue.
5)
Install bus turnouts .at the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard and
Highland Avenue and bus stops at the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard
and Silverberry Street..
6)
Contribute towards the cost of necessary off-site improvements within the
study area on a fair share or "pro-rata" basis.
A SANBAG project to realign Highland Avenue in conjunction with Route 30 Freeway
project is currently in progress.. A City project to complete portions of Day Creek
Boulevard is also in progress at this time. The developer shall provide for the
completion of public improvements after SANBAG and City construction, as
determined by the City Engineer.. if the SAN BAG or City project does not progress in
a timely manner, the develc, per shall be required to provide frontage improvements to
Highland Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard, as determined by the City Engineer~
b)
The circulation design features will be required to conform with our Street Design,
Driveway, and Intersection Lir~e-of~Sight policies.
c)
The project involves the extensio~ of Victoria Park Lane to the west and east, through
the utility corridor and the former utility corridor, as needed, to connect with existing
street stub outs. The project also irwolves construction of Day Creek Boulevard and
relocation of Highland Avenue, i:n conjunction with City and SANBAG projects for the
same.
e) The required frontage improvements include sidewalks and bike lanes as needed.
f)
The required frontage improve:rner~ts include bus turnouts as needed.
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 8
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
result in impacts to:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Wo~lld the proposal
Endangered, threatened, or r'are species or their
habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees,
eucalyptus windrow, etc.)?
Locally designated natural communities (e.g.,
eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, eto)?
Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal
pool)?
Wildlife dispersal or migration. corridors?
Irnpict Les~
Pc~tent~allyIUnll*~11 Thin
S ~n*f'~.~n tM~l~gal~onS~nff.:anl NO
(;~ ( ) (x) ()
() () () (x)
( ) ( ) (x) ( )
( ) () ( ) (x)
( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Comments:
a, c)
The property is located in a~n area identified as a potential habitat for endangered or
threatened species. The subject si, te contains indicator species of sage scrub habitat.
As a result, habitat assessment and biological protocol surveys were required to
determine potential impacts, particularly to the federally-listed, threatened California
gnatcatcher and the endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat. The habitat
assessment and protocol surveys were conducted by BonTerra Consulting in March
through May 1998, by biologists permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wifdlife Service. A
spring survey was also conducted on July 2, 1998, to determine if any sensitive plant
species were located on the project site (BonTerra, August 24, 1998). The report
indicates the habitat on site is not occupied by either of the two endangered species
pursuant to surveys conducted according to USFWS protocol. The report concludes
the dominant plant species o.r~ the site are considered non-sensitive. One special
interest plant, Parry's spinefbwer, was observed on the project site. The report
indicates this species is on a review list and is not considered to be a sensitive species
which would require mitigation.
The site is located south of '[he. f.uture freeway, in an urbanized area which is heavily
impacted by suburban actMties (traffic, light and glare, human contact, household
pets). The subject property does not have the potential to be included in a multi-
species habitat conservatio¢~ plan or' to be instrumental in reserve design.
It should be. noted that on Now.~mber 3, 1998, BonTerra Consulting submitted a letter
to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service indicating an incidental sighting of a pair of
California Gnatcatchers northeast o,f this project site in February of 1998. Yet the
California Gnatcatcher was not found on the subject site during field visits and protocol
surveys conducted in March arid April of the same yea:r. No evidence of nests or
nesting was observed on the subject site during field visits. It is, therefore, presumed
1,//
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 9
that the species does not occupy the subject site. There appears to be high quality
sage scrub habitat north of the project site (north of the future freeway) which may
have preservation potenttall and which may be occupied by the sighted pair of
California Gnatcatchers.
Based upon the above findtrigs, the site is not occupied by sensitive or endangered
species, and the habitat is nol[ in a location which would be considered for preservation
strategies, the proposed development of the site will not likely result in adverse effects
to sensitive or endangered species.
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
proposal.'
a)
b)
c)
Would the
Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the
region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
$~gne~nt
c)
d)
e)
Polent,ally Th,~n
.................. Impeel Imp~ Imper~
HA~RDS. Would the propo,sa/ involve:'
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Possible intederence with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuaHon plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Exposure, of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 10
10.
ISSues er~J Supporbng Info~mabon So~,rce$
NOISE. Will the proposal result' #~,'
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels'?
() ( ) ( ) (x)
() (x) ()
Comments:
b)
The project site abuts the future Route 30 Freeway to the north and will be impacted
by freeway noise. A noise impact study (Mestre Greve Associates, October 1998)
was prepared for the project which recommends a 6-foot high freeway sound
attenuation wall along the northern boundary and required building upgrades for
numerous perimeter lots. With the design review of the tentative tract, the
configuration of the commercial area and the location of many residential lots
changed since the noise study was prepared. The tentative tract was redesigned such
that the commercial area abuts the future freeway along the entire project frontage,
residential lots are south of the commercial area, further from the freeway noise. The
conditions of approval shall require a fina~ noise study to be reviewed and approved
by the City Planner prior to final map approval. The project shall provide sound
attenuation walls and building upgrades pursuant to the recommendations in
the final noise study.
11.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or' altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Schools? ( ) (X) () ()
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
c)
The Etiwanda and Chaffey Higir~ School Districts submitted correspondence indicating
existing schools that would serve this project are already at or above capacity. The
Districts contend that mitigation beyond the State statutory fees will be needed. The
conditions of approval shall include a standard condition applicable upon notice by a
school district, which requires the developer to consent/participate in the establishment
of, or annex into an existing, Melto-Roos Community Facilities District for school
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 11
facilities. Alternatively, the developer may execute an agreement with the Districts to
privately accommodate school impacts as a result of the project.
12.
S~ln~f~nt
Impact
Unlee~
Ilaue! end Supl:x~he, g Ir~o~mat~o~ $Ou*~Cel S~lmflcan! S~gnd'~ant NO
................. Impact Impact Impact
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS,, Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or
substantial alterations to the following utih'ties:
a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Communication system, s? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Local or regional water treatmerit: or distribution
facilities? ( ) () ( ) (X)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) (X) ( )
f) Solid waste disposal? (,) ( ) ( ) (X)
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
Comments:
e)
The proiect will not result in, substantial alternations to the master plan of storm
drainage. Development will install new storm drains as needed.
13.
Pote~"ll,811y
Iml:~cl
Unte~s
Pot~lieily Tha~
IIl~'II Ir~ Sup¢,ng 113formlt~3n Sour(~l S~lnd'~,~nl S~ICK~I~I NO
AESTHETICS. Would the proposak
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic:', highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X)
14.
CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would tJbe proposal,'
a) Disturb paleontological resour'oes?
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
() ( ) ( ) (x)
( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
Initial Study for
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ()
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( )
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? ()
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 12
S ~ln~r, cant
() ( ) (x)
() () (x)
() ( ) (x)
15.
Issues an~ Suppod~ng Irrfocm,t~on Sources $*gn~cant
.................... Impecl
RECREATION. Would the proposal.:'
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or' regional
parks or other recreational facilities? ( )
b) Affect existing recreational op.podunities? ( )
No
() () (x)
( ) ( ) (x)
16.
MANDATORY FINDiN6S OF St6NI,FICANOE,
a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially .~educe. the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a 'fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? ( )
b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-
term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term
impacts will endure well into the future.) ( )
Impact Lesm
M~I~aIK>n S ~gn rf ~:~l,nt
No
( ) ( ) (x)
( ) ( ) (x)
~R~-L:xg-9~9 11: 19 FF~: NILLI~ LY~N HO~S !~*q~.~:I7E~661
SENT BY: R CUCANIONGA COU OEV; 2~22.9~ I;::~iuI 90gzZ78847 '=>
TO:
F~GE:
initial Study fat
VCPA 98-02 & VTT 15871
d~
Cumulative: Doee ~he prc~ect ~ave ir:lpact~
are in~l~du~ty limited, ~ c~lafively
~nsi~able? ('Cumulatively' ~ns~eraD~e"
are ~i~le wh~
[he eff~S cf p~gt p~ojectS, ~ ~e~ of o~er
current preje~, ~d the afters of probable future
p~e~s.)
one.mental off~
m~e eff~ts on hum~ bei~s, e~er dir~tly
or
~ty of Ranctlo Cucamcnga
Page 13_
( ) ( ) ( ) (x)
rr. ARU~R ANAJLYSER
Earlier anaty~e= may be used where,. pursLmnt to the ti.e~lng, p¢ogram _F.I~, of other CEQA
one or more effecl= t~ave bee~ aMequate~ e~l~zed in an earlier EIFI of Negative Deedare:ion per
Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified a~ove lot this project were within the scope of and
az~equete~ snalyze(t in the fol~vdz~ eaMlm document(s) Oureuant to applicable legal smqd~rds.
and such eifeCt~ were acldreeeed by m,ili..qe;tla't rn~eures baeed on the earlier analysis. The
fo,ow~ng eartier analVse~ were utilized in completing ~t~ Initial Study er'~ are evadable for review
in the City of Rancho Cuc. gmonge, Plenni.9 D/viSiOn ofbcea. 10500 Civic Center Drive (check
lha[ apply):
(x)
(x)
(x)
Genera[ Plan EIR
(Certifie~ April 6. 198t )
Me$1el' Envtronmenlat A~e~mertl lot ~he 1989 Ger~eral ~an Update
(SCH #880201 ~ 5, certified January 4, 1989~
Victorm Planned Cornmuntty E.IR
(C_.ertltled May 20, 198! }
APPUCAINT CERTI FICATIe N
I certify that Iem the eppt{~nt for t~e prefect described [n ~15 inlllai Study. t acknowledge that I
have read thie Initial ~axty and the proposed rniUgaUon measures. Further, I have revised the
project plans o~ proposals and/o~ he~eOy' agree to the proposed m{t/ge~o'n measures to avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to · polr~t where (~leerty no significant environmental effect9 wobtd
OCCur.
RESOLUI'[I~ NO. 87-96
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANINtNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE
UN DERGROUN DING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86-77
WHEREAS, the Planninlg Cc~mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86-77 which was adopted on the 28th day of
May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein;
WHEREAS, the Planning ,Commi:ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote
a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City;
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property
owners and developers of the City gn, al~.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all develol~nents,
except those contained in Section 7' and any others specifically waived by the
Planning Commission, shall be r'es~)onsibte for undergrounding all existing
overhead utility lines including the r£~noval of the related supporting poles
adjacent to and within the limits o¢ a development as follows:
1. Lines on the project side of ~:he street*::
a. Said lines shall be undergrcnJnded at the developer's expense.
In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that
undergrounding is impracti:cal at present for such reasons as a short
length of undergrounding ('less than 300 feet and not undergrounded
adjacent), a heavy cor~centration of services to other users,
disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an
in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6.
The Developer shall be eligit:>le for reimbursement of one-half the cost
of undergrounding frofn fut~.Jre developments as they occur on the
opposite side of the street.
Lines on the opposite side of' the street from the project: The Developer'
shall pay a fee to the City for on(~:~half the amount per Section 6.
Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with
Section 1 above and be eligible for' reimbursement or pay additional fees
so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of
undergrounding the lines on botch sides of the street.
Pole lines containinB 66KV or ila!i'~e_rl, electrical lines: All lines shall be
undergrounded or in-lieu ('ees paled ~n accordance with section l, 2 or 3,
above, except for 66 KV or larger electrical lines
/'-/7
5. Limits of Responsibilities.:
In-lieu fees shall be I~as. ed upon the length of the property being
developed from property li~e to property line (the center of adjacent
streets for corner properties.}~
b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend
to: (1) the first existing p,o'le off-site from the project boundaries
(across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a
project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an
existing pole within 5. feet of a project boundary, except at a corner.
6. Fee Amount: The a~ount for ir~...lieu fees shall equal the length (per
Section 5. a) times the unit a~Ok.~nt as established by the City Council
based upon inf~'ormation supplie<::t by the utility c:c~npanies and as updated
periodically as deemed necess;ary,
7. Exemptions:
pol icy:
The following tyl:'.l. es of projects shall be exempt from this
a. The addition of functional eq:uipment to existing developments, such
as: loading docks, silos, s,:].t:ellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air
conditioners, cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area,
parking and loading areas, block walls and fences., etc.
b. Building additions or ~'~ew free standing buildings of less than 25% of
the floor area of the exi'~t'ing bu~ilding(s) on the same assessor's
parcel, or 5,000 square fee~i whichever is less.
c. Exterior upgrading or reI::~,air of existing developments, such as:
reroofing, addit. ion of tr'ell!is, awnings, landscaping, equipment
screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc.
d. interior termant improvementi~,~!'.~ ar'~d non-construction CUPs.
e. The construction of a s~ingle family residence on an existing parcel.
f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility
easements wi th a heavy concentration of services to adjacent
developments, and the uti'lity lines are 500' or more from the right of
way line of a Special Boulevards.
g. Residential subdivisions of f~>~.~r or fewer single family residential
parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' offsite from
both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to
contribute to future under'gr'~:)u~'lding.
All references to streets s~all a.'Iso mean alleys, railroad or channet
rights-of-way, etc.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THiES loth DAY OF JUNE 1987.
PLANNING COMMISSIC~ OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMC~GA
[, Brad Buller, Deputy Secret. ary <~f the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10 day of June, 1987, b..y the fol'lowing vote-to-wi~:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS;
EMER[CK, CHIT~'EA, MCNIEL
NOES: COKMI SS ION ERS: 't"OLS TOY
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
B LA KF.'S L EY
RESOLUTION NO 99-28
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALJFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN TO REDUCE THE VILLAGE
COMMERCIAL LAND AREA FROM APPROXIMATELY 23 ACRES TO
16 ACRES, AND TO REDESIGNATE APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES OF
LAND FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) ON A PROJECT SITE :CONSISTING OF 62.3 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND THE FUTURE
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 227-021-03. ,AND 13.
A, Recitals.
1. William Lyon Homes filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment
No. 98-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Victoda Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On Apdl 14, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public Headng on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby fou.nd, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamor~ga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specilically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct
2~ Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,
this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 62.3 acres,
basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and
future Day Creek Boulevard, and which is presently vacant. The subject property is currently
designated Village Commercial in the northern 23 acres of the site, Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) in the central 16 acres of the site, and Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) in the southern 23.3 acres of the site; and
b. The surrounding properlies to the south, east, and west are within the Victoria
Planned Community. The property to the south is vacant land designated Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). Tihe property to the east is vacant land designated Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). The property to the west is a utility corridor designated
Utility Corridor; and
EX t4t! IT
15o
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VCPA 98-02 - WILLIAM LYON
Apdl 14, 1999
Page 2
99-28
c. The surrounding property to the north is vacant land consisting of the future Route
30 freeway and further north, unincorpo,rated County area pre-zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Spe¢:ific Plan
d. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan,
the Victoria Community Plan, and with related development; and
e. The amendment promotes th, e goals and objectives of the General Plan Land Use
Element and the Victoria Community Plan; arid
properties
properties.
f. This amendment would Flor be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
and would not have a sig~ificant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
3. Based upon the substantial evideF~ce presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibility, with, existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendFnent would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and inform,:~f, ior~ contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
apprication, the Planning Commission finds, that there is. no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the en,,,ironrr~ent and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon
the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Deck~r.ation has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the Plann:ing Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse. environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upor~ substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the PIanning Commission during the
public hearing, the Planning Commissio¢~ hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 ~:)f the California Code of Regulations.
15'/
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,
VCPA 98-02 - WILLIAM LYON
Apdl 14, 1999
Page 3
99-28
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-02
to change the Land Use Map for the subiect properties to 16 acres of Village Commercial in the
northern portion of the site and the remaining 46 acres of the site to be Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit
6. Within 60 days of City Council approval, the developer shall submit a revised Victoria
Community Plan, incorporating the necessary changes to make the graphics and text current to
the date of this amendment, for City Plianner review and approval. Upon acceptance by the City
Planner, the developer shall provide the original graphics and text exhibits for retention by the City
and for use in reproducing and distributing amended copies of the Victoria Community Plan.
7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS t4TH DAY' OF APRIL 1999,
PLANNING CO?SSlON OF THE CITY C)F RANCHO' CUCAMONGA
~ La~ T. M.~el, Cha'rman
ATTEST:
Brad B
I, Brad Buller, Secretary for the Planning: Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of' the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of April 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS,, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
13~5~1CT5
MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NONE
4T: NONE * carried
ENVIR( NTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15282 - SILVERADO
GROUP, subdivision of 5~0 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Industrial Park District
(Subarea 7) Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the south side of Foothill
Boulevard, east Avenue - APN: 208-352-82.
Dan James, Senior Civil Enc r, presented the staff report,
Chairman McNiel opened the
Ir'i;ng:,
Jens Thielmann, Thielmann Engineers, 1
agreed to the conditions.
Town and Country Road, Orange, indicated they
Hearing no further testimony', Chairman McNiel
the hearing.
Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Tolstoy,
15282. Motion carried by the following vo~e:
~e resolution approving Parcel Map
AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART,
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE -carried
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT'AI~.,!'E) VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02
- WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan to reduce the
Village Commercial land area from approximately 23 acres to 16 acres, and to redesignate
approximately 16 acres of land from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to
Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwellting units per acre) on a project site consisting of 62.3
acres of land, located southwest. of Highland Avenue and the future Day Creek Boulevard -
APN: 227-021-03and 13.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTI AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 15871 - WILLIAM
LYON HOMES - The proposed subdivision and design review of detailed site plan and
elevations for 18'1 single family Iots on 62~$ acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential
District (4-8 dwelling units per acre.) of' I~he Victoria Community Plan, located southwest o1'
Highland Avenue and the futureDrcyCreekBoulevard-APN: 227-021-03and 13.
Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner',. p~resented the staff report and suggested a change to
the resolution to require that the developer submit a revised Victoria Community Plan incorporating
the changes made to the graphics and text made by this amendment. She asked for Commission
direction regarding undergrounding.
Chairman McNiel asked how much area will not be undergrounded if the undergrounding is per
the resolution as proposed.
Planning Commission Minutes
~ April 14, 1999
B'"
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer', responded about 600 feet would be deleted from a strict
interpretation of the undergrounding policy.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, pointed out Ihat there is an unusual amount of frontage adjoining
the project because of the various rights of way,
Chairman McNiel recalled a similar situation ir~ connection with a project on Eighth Street which
was very shallow but had side streets and a faitroad right of way to the rear and the Commission
required the full amount of undergroundir~g~,
Mr. James clarified that undergrounding per a strict interpretation of the resolution would provide
for an additional 600 feet but there is a total of 1,200 feet in the area, He noted that the property
to the north side is already developed,
Commissioner Mannedno asked how n'~uch area is to be undergrounded.
Mr. James replied a total of 1,600 feet across their property and beyond. He indicated the area
to be undergrounded on a map.
Commissioner Stewart observed that if the additional 600 feet is required of the developer, there
will still be another 60.0 feet that will not be undergrounded.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there iis a possibility that the land will be released for development.
Mr, James responded that was possible. He rioted the flood control basin is to the south.
Commissioner Tolstoy, observed the u, tilil.ie:s could be undergrounded at that time. He asked about
the small triangular piece.
Ms. Van Buren observed it is zoned Commercial but will not be suitabte for development for quite
some time because of Caltrans work.
Chairman McNiel opened the public headr19.
Carl Morabito, William Lyon Homes, 4490 Von Karman Avenue, Newport Beach, commended the
City for its design review process and said it is a refreshing process. He thanked staff for the work
done on the project, He felt the residential and commerciaf uses will work well together. He
thought the situation is unique with respect to undergrounding and said it was his understanding
that they should only be required to pay 1/2 of the cost of undergrounding times the length of the
project frontage, He indicated that under!;~rounding along the San Bernardino County Flood
Control Channel and the Southern California Edison rights of way adds another 45 percent to their
undergrounding. He questioned why Engineering Condition No. 3 was added and said it was
recently added followi~ng a Technical Review Committee Meeting, He asked that Engineering
Condition No. 3 be removed
Commissioner Mannedno asked for confirmation that the applicant believes they should only be
responsible for 1/2 the cost of undergrounding across their site.
Mr. Morabito replied that was their underst'c~r'~dir~g and request.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McN'iel closed the public hearing,
Planning Commission Minutes
...5 .... April14,1999
Mr. James noted that: the utility lines are c(.¢rrendy on the north side of Highland; however, Caltrans
is relocating them and the project will have property on both sides of Highland Avenue, thus they
are responsible for both halves. He observed that Mitigation Measure Condition No. 6 requires
that the development pay its fair share contribution to traffic militations with respect to the project's
Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis. He explained that Engineering
Condition No. 3 was an intent by the City Engineer to specify that fair share amount and to clarify
that it must be a cash in lieu deposit. He observed that even if the Commission were to delete
Engineering Condition No. 3, the developer would still be responsible for the payment. He stated
that Engineering will attempt to be specific on all future projects.
Mr. Coleman indicated this is not the. first time that fee has been required. He noted the fair share
amount was calculated by the applicant's consultant and verified by City staff.
Commissioner Mannerino felt undergrounding as recommended by staff is fair. He felt payment
of the full cost of undergrounding along Highland Avenue should be required. He supported
approval with the recommended changes by staff.
Chairman McNiel commented that he would ask that the applicant pay for the additional 600 feet
if they were not being required to pay for undergrounding along both sides of Highland Avenue.
Commissioner Mannedno felt that requ, irir",g the additional 600 feet would not do the City much
good because there would still be another 600 feet that would not be undergrounded without
having it be a City project.
Commissioners Stewart and Tolstoy concurred with Commissioner MannerinD.
Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by' M:acias, to issue a Negalive Declaration for Vesting
Tentative Tract 15871 and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of Victoria Community
Plan Amendment 98-02 and approving Vesting Tentative Tract 15871 and design review thereof
with modification to require that the developer submit a revised Victoria Community PJan
incorporating the changes reflected in this proiect. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL., STEWART, TOLSTOY
NONE
NONE - carried
H. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMEN'[1,99-01,- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM...~ . .¢~r:-equest
to amend the regulations for wireress communication facilities.
Rebecca Van Buren, Association Planner, presented the staff..r. ep'~.~:
Chairman McNiel asked if there is a limit to the numl~'~: ¢,~¢antennas on a co-location facility.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, indi number is unlimited by the ordinance as proposed;
however, there are practical how many can fit. on one monopole because they must
be a certain distance fro
Ms. Van Bure~~'t'e~J the City could require redesign as a stealth facility under the conditional
use per~:~
Planning Commission Minutes .5... April 14, 1999
NE
City of Rancho Cucamonga
IVE DECLARATION
The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code.
Project File No.:
Amendment 98-02
Project Name:
Victoria Community Plan
Public Review Period Closes: May 5, 1999
Project Applicant: William Lyon Homes
Project Location (also see attached map): Locat:ed southwest of Highland Avenue and future Day Creek
Boulevard - APN: 227-021-03 and 13,
Project Description: A request to amend the V.ictoria Community Plan to reduce the Village Commercial
land area from approximately 23 acres to 16 acr'es~ end to redesignate approximately 16 acres of land from
Medium Residential (8-~4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residentia[ (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
on a project site consisting of 623 acres of land.
This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cuc=monga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an
Initial Study to determine if the project may =have a significant effect on the environment and is
proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding:
The Initial Study shows that there is ~o substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment.
[] The initial Study identified potentially' si9, nificant effects but:
(1)
Revisions in the project plans o.r proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this
proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or
mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. and
(2)
There is no substantial' evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have
a significant effect on the environm,ent.
If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all
related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at
10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax: (909) 477-2847.
NOTICE
The public is invited to comment on the prop.osed Negative Declaration during the review period.
May 5. 1999
Date of Determination
i~,dopted By
/57
ORDINANCE NO~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI'"FY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT 98-02, AMENDING THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN TO
REDUCE THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL LAND AREA FROM
APPROXIMATELY 23 ACRES TO 16 ACRES, AND TO REDESIGNATE
APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES OF LAND FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-
14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW~MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON A PROJECT SITE CONSISTING OF
62.3 ACRiES OF LAND, LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF HIGHLAND AVENUE
AND THE FUTURE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-021-03 AND 13.
A. Recitals.
1. William Lyon Homes has filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment
No. 98-02 as described in the title of this,,,Ordi,nance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject
Victoria Community Plan Amendment is r:eferred to as "the application."
2. On April !4, 1999, the Pla~nning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended to the City Council
approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-02,
3. On May 5~ 1999, the City Council of the City' of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the application.
All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically 'finds. that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
A, of this Ordinance are true and correct~
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced
public hearing on May 5, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 62.3 acres,
basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and future
Day Creek Boulevard a~which is present'ly vacant. The subject property' is currently designated
Village Commercial in th-e northern 23. ac:~'es, of the site, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) in the central 16 acres of the site, a:nd Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
in the southern 23.3 acres of the site;: and
b. The surrounding properties to the south, east, and west are within the Victoria
Planned Community. The property to the south is vacant land designated Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre). The property to the east is vacant land designated Low Residential
(2.4 dwelling units per acre). The property to the west is a utility corridor designated Utility Corridor;
and
ORDINANCE NO.
VCPA 98-02 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES
May 5, 1999
Page 2
c. The surrounding property to the north is vacant land consisting of the future Route
30 freeway and further north, unincorporated County area pre-zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling
units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan; and
d. The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use. Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan,
the Victoria Community Plan, and with related development; and
e. The amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the General Plan Land Use
Element and the Victoria Community Plan; and
f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
3. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby
issues a mitigated Negative Declaration.
4. Based upon the substantia~ evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district
in terms of access, size, and compatibili,ty with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed arnendment with the mitigation identified in the Negative
Declaration would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding
properties than would be expected under th,e existing land use designation; and
c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance. with the General Plan and will
not result in any internal inconsistenc,ies with the General Plan,
5. Based upon the findings and co¢3clusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 98-02, amending the land use
map from Village Commercial in the northern 23 acres of the site, Medium Residential (8-14
dwelling units per acre) in the central 16 acres of the site, and Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) in the southern 2:3.3 acres of the site, to Village Commercial in the northern
16 acres of the site and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) in the southern
46.3 acres, and as shown in Exhibit
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the, adoption of' this Ordinance.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
.................... CIFY OF RANCI't() CUCAMONGA
S'I'A FF REPORT
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members ~..t the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Walter Stickney A.ssociate Engineer
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RES()LUTION FOR THE LEVY
AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSES SMENTS WITHIN THE
PARK AND RECRI'!ATtO'N IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR
FISCAl. YEAR 1999/()0. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS
PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Cotmci hold the public hearing and approve the attached
Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation
Improvement District (PD-85) for Fiscal Year 1999/00.
BACKGRO U ND/AN.A LY SI S:
This Park and Recreation 11mprovement District was created to provide funds to finance the
cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park
and Red Hill Community Park~ Heritage Community Park is a 40 acre facility located on the
southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and
is located on the southwest corner of I3ase Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District
boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land
east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities
Staff has presented the Engineer s Reports to the Public Works Subcommitee with the
recommendation of no increases in the assessment :rates.
Pursuant to the ][,andscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt
a resolution, declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments. The assess~nent rate
increased from $35.00 to $52.00 dm:ing the 1991/92 Fiscal Year, this rate is recommended to
remain at $52.00 for the 1999/00 Fiscal Year. Assessments for PI)-85 will be levied according
to the followir~g schedule:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF
PARK AND RI!~iCREATION 1MP]I{OVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85)
May 5, 1999
Page 2
Definition
Single Family Residential
Less than 1.50 acres
3.51 acres to 7.00 acres
7.01 acres to 14.(10 a.~zres
14.01 acres to 25.00 acres
25.01 acres and Larger
Respectfully subn[itted
') .~/'~/' //
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WS:dlw
Attach~nent: Resolution
Assessment per Parcel
$52.00
$26.00
$182.00
$364.00
$728.00
$1,300.00
RESOLUTION NO. ~q--" / ~9 ,~
A RES OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WlTHIiN THE PARK AND RECREATION
IMPROVEMENT DISTRIiCT PI3-85 (HERITAGE AND RED HILL
COMMUNITY PARKS)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of
March, 1999, adopt its Resolution of Intention iNo. 99-061 to order the therein described work in
connection with the Park and Recreation Improvement iDistrict which Resolution of Intention No.
99-061 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by
the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and
documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for
the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now
acquired jurisdiction to order the propo,,~ed work:.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the public interest a.nd convenience requires the levy and collection of
assessments within the Park and Recreat:ion Improvement District for the Fiscal Year 1999/00, and
said City Council hereby orders that the w'ork, as set fbrth and described in said Resolution of
Intention No.99-061 be done and made; am:t
SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that the assessments forFiscal Year 1999/00 are hereby
approved.
DATE:
'FO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
{.. i I O F 1;~ A N C H O (i ~i5 (~A M () N GA
STAFF REPORT
May 5, 1999
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manage:r
William J. () Neff, C:ity' Engit~eer
Walter Stickney, Asso,,~ate, Engineer
CONS IDERATION TO APPROVE TltE RESOLUTION FOR TIlE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 99/00. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Resolution
authorizing the levy and collectior~ of assessments for Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is also recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in these
districts for Fiscal 'Year 1999/00
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
It is recommended that assessment rates m>t be increased in any of the Landscape Maintenance
Districts for the FY 1999/00. Water costs savings due to water conservation efforts that include a
program to continue computerizing the: irrigation systems for the entire District's maintained
landscape areas is helping to keep the cost. down allowing the assessment rate to be the same as the
rates for FY 1998/99. In many of the districts back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties
thereby increasing the revenue in those. dist:ricts. In some districts an increase in the amount of
landscape areato maintain has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs.
This cost will be offset by increase in revenue received from new developments in the district. In
past years, any available prior year carry over was used to keep assessments below the annual
assessment revenue requirements In some districts this is still true and has allowed the assessment
rate to remain constant. The tbllowing, along 'with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies
proposed FY 99/0(i) rates. The Engineer"s Reports identify the required budget for each district and
any carryover used to reduce rates~
A tax delinquency' amount is added to, eac, h d~strtct s budget t cover anticipated delinquencies in tax
payments. If the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the district can be added to the
districts fund balance.
CITY C()UNCIL STAFF REPOR'F
LANDSCAPE MAI'NTENAN(i;E DISTRIC:TS
May 5, 1999
Page 2
Landscape Maintenance District No. !_:..General City
It is recommended that the assessment rafe remain at $92.21 for the FY 99/00. Prior year carryover
funds will be applied in the district:, however they may not be available in future years.
Landscape Maintenance District No. ;2 -.}!ict.oria Planned Community
It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $422.00 for the FY 99/00. LMD #2 has the
largest landscape area of any district m the City with 123.49 acres, of which 32.37 acres is parks.
Prior year carry overs will be applied but ma.y not be available in the fi~ture.
Landscape Maintenance District No. ~i~&,:' Hyssop
It is recommended that the assessme~t rate remain at $413.74 for the FY 99/00.
iLandscape Maintenance District No.3B,:, Commercial/Industrial
It is recommended that the assessmerit ~'a.te remain at $352.80 per acre for the FY 99/00.
Landscape Maintenance District No.,,!DjI'.ena Vista
It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $252.50 for the FY 99/00. LMD #4 has 36.23
acres of parks. Prior year carry overs will be alpplied but may not be available in the future
Landscape Maintenance District No:. 5__.::::....~".!~s2LLo[
It is recommended that the assessment r.a~.e remain at $113.29 for the FY 99/00,
Landscape Maintenance District No.
It is recommended that the assess~nent ['ate remain at $246.97 fbr the FY 99/00. Prior year carry
overs will be applied but ~nay not be av'ailable in the future.
Landscape Maintenance District N~o~.,~::::,~,!~0gh Etiwanda
It is recommended that the assessment rate remain al:. $307.05 tbr the FY 99/00. Etiwanda Creek
Park located on the east side of East Avem.~e north of and adjacent to the Summit Intermediate
School was accepted into the district i~ fiscal year 97/98 for maintenance of 12 acres.
C, ITY COUNCIL STAFF REPOR'~'~
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCe;; DISTRICTS
May 5, 1999
Page .3
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 - South Etiwanda
It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $151.45 for the FY 99/00.
Respectfully Submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
Attachment: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. t~ 9 --/LS{~t~
A RESOI.,UTION OF THE CH'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE
AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972,
WHEREAS, the City Council c~f the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of
March, 1999, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 99-059 to order the therein described work in
connection with the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which
Resolution of Intention No. 99-059 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner
as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in
the Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and
documentary, conceming the jurisdiction f~tcts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for
the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now
acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work:.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the public h'~terest and convenience requires the levy and collection of
assessments within the Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the
Fiscal Year 1999/00, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described
in said Resolution of Intention No. 99-(~59; be clone and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that the assessments forFiscal Year 1999/00 are hereby
approved.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
TY O F RANCHO CIiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
May 5, 11999'
Mayor' and Members ol? the: City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City iManager
William J. O'Neil, C:ity' ' ," ......
Walter Stickney, Associate Engineer
CONSIDERATION 17(i:) APPROVE Title RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY AND
COL. LECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE I)ISTRICTS NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FORFISCAL YEAR
1999/00. NO INCREASE 'OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Counc:il hold the public hearing and approve the Resolution
authorizing the levy and collection of assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos.
I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. It is reco~nmended there be no increase in assessment rates in these districts
tbr Fiscal Year 1999/00
BACKGROUNDh%NAL~ S S
Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates in
all eight of the Street .Light Maintenance Districts are not recommended to be increased this fiscal
year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. The Southern California Edison
electric rate is expected to remain stable fbr the 1999/00 fiscal year. At the present time, each
district is able to stand on its own without: additional funding from other sources. In some districts
there is an increase in the number ofstre:et lights being maintained. However these will not effect
the assessment rate a.t this ti~ne. Edison charges tbr traffic signals are also included in the applicable
districts. In addition, Operations and iMaintenance charges for traffic signals, will also be borne by
the applicable districts. In past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep
assessments below' the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for the FY
99/00 and wilt allow the assessment rates to remain stable. The following identifies proposed F Y
99/00 rates. The Engineer's Reports identify the required budget for each district and any carryover
used to offset maintenance costs.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT'
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
May 5, 1999
Page 2
3'he assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows:
Street Lighting Maintenance District Assessment Rate per Assessment Unit
SLMD #1 - Arterial
SLMD #2 - Local
SLMD #3 - Victoria Planned Community
SLMD #4 - Terra Vista Planned Commtmity
SLMD #5 - Caryn Planned Communi. ty
SLMD #6 - Commercial/Industrial
SLMD #7 - North Etiwanda
SLMD #8 - South Etiwanda
$17.77
$39.97
$47.15
$28.96
$3460
$51.4O
$33.32
$193.75'
*This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of
street lights to assessment units.
Respectfully submi[ted,
Wilfl~. J. O Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WS:dlw
Attachment: Resolution
~£SOLUTION NO. q q- / O ~'
A KESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC:IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CAIAFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4:, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPE AND LIGH FIN ~ ACT OF 1972.
WHEREAS, 'the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of
March, 1999, adopt its Resolution of Intention No~99-063 to order the therein described work in
connection with the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which
Resolution of Intention No.99-063 was duty and legally published in the time, form and manner as
required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the
Office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, any new street lights m areas to be maintained by the District, will become
part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The
normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient
non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs
of energizing and six months of ordinary ~md usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street
lights in each development at the time ofimtial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be
based on the number ~md type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's
rate for street lights. Immediately upon energization of the street lights, those street lights will
become a part of the work program o:f the district.
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and
documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for
the contemplation work and the benefits 'to be dehved therefrom and said City Council having now
acquired jurisdiction to order' the proposed work:.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Ccmncit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of
assessments within the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the
Fiscal Year 1999/00, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described
in said Resolution of Intention No. 99-0.63., be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it finally resolved that: the assessments forFiscal Year 1999/00 are hereby
approved.
/70
LMD I & SLD 2
(Residential Only)
Maintained Areas (in acres):
Ground Cover and Shrubs
Turf
Parks
Contrntmity Trails
FY98/99
24.58
1.61
38.25
7.37
Total Area
71.81
7Z04
Annual Assessment (per assessment unit):
LIVE) 1:
Annual Assessment: FY98/99 - $ 9Z21/yr
FY99/00 proposed - $ 9Z2'l/yr
7,268 Single Family
5,956 Multi-Farr~ly
SLD2:
Annual Assessment: FY98/99 - $ 39.97/yr
FY99/00 proposed - $ 39.97/yr
# of Parcels:
6,604 Single Family
SLD 1 Major ~ (Entire City):
FY98/99 - $17.77/yr
FY99/(X) proposed - $17.77/yr
# of Parcels:
17,244 Single Family
5,997 Multi-Family
2,0t6.36 ~cial/!ndustrial Acres
HIGH~ AND
.
6th
F
FOO T"-tlLI. RI vr~
~ *~oda Planned Corrr~nity
LMD 2 & SLD 3
LIVD 2 Maintained Areas (in acres):
Total Area 125.90 t27.t4
Annual Assesstrent (per assessment unit):
I_NE) 2:
Annual Assessn-ent: FY98/99 - $ 42Z00/yr
FY99/00 proposed- $ 422.00hjr
# of Parcels:
4,345 Single Family
124 Multi-Family
24.4 Commercial/Industrial acres
407.59 Vacant acres
SLD3'
Annual Assessment: FY98/99 - $ 47.15/yr
FY99/00 proposed- $ 47.15/yr
4,345 Single Family
124 IVkJ!ti..Fm'nil~
73.64 ~ial acres
u
HWY
FOOTHILL
6th
cH,ROH ~
RI vr)
LMD 3a & LMD 5
~ 3a Maintained Areas (in acres):
FY98/99 FY99/0O
Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.14 0.14
Turf 0.00 0.0O
Parks 0.00 0.00
' Community Trails 0.0O 0.0O
Total Area 0.t4 0.14
LIVE) 5 Maintained Areas (in acres):
Annual Assessment (per assessment unit):
FY98/99 - $ 413.74/yr
FY99/00 proposed - $ 413.74/yr
FY98/99 - $113.29/yr
FY98/99 FY99/00
Grou~ Cover and Shrubs 0.14 0.t4
Turf 0.0O 0.00
Parks 0.0O 0.0O
~ity Trails 0.0O 0.0O
Total Area 0.14 0.14
FY99/00 proposed - $113.29/yr
# of Parcels:
8 C(xnrmmial/!ndustrial parcels
44 Single Family
HWY
~= '~ i t HIGHLAND
~ ~ ~ ~ Ten; Hsta Planned Co~nity
~ LMD 4 & SLD 4
RARF ~ i~JF ~J~OAD
6th ST
FOOTHILL ~1
L.IVD 4 Maintained Areas (in acres):
Ground Cover and Shrubs
Turf
Parks
Total Area
51.27
51.27
Annual Assessment (per assessment unit):
LIVD4'
Annual Assessment: FY98/99 - $ 252.50/yr
FY99/00 !xoposed - $ 252.50/yr
# of Parcels:
1,788 Single Family
2,499 Multi-Family
199.45 ~al acres
SLD4:
Annual Assessment:
# of Parcels:
1,786 Single F~ly
199.45 ~cial acres
ROAr)
WILSON
AVE~
BASF l INF ROAn
Ht~H! ANn
SUM
Caryn Planned Community
LMD 6 & SLD 5
LND 6 Maintained Areas (in acres):
Ground Cover and Shrubs
Turf_
Commun~ Trails
To~ Ama
Annual Assessment (per assessment unit):
FY98/99 - $ 246.97/yr
FY99/00 proposed- $ 246.97/yr
# of Parcels:
1,249 Single Family
FY9~9- $ 34.60~
FY99/00 proposed -$ 34.60/yr
# of Parcels:
1,249 Single Family
Commercial/Industrial
LMD 3b & SLD 6
(Commercial/!~al Areas Only)
~ 3b Maintained Areas (in acres):
Total Area
Annual/tssessme~t (per assessment unit):
LMD3b:
Annual A~.~-~s~-nent: FY98/99 - $ 352.80/yr
FY~00 proposed - $ 3szSO~yr
# of Acres:
1,860.49 Comrmrcial/Industrial Acres
SLD6'
Annual Assessment:
FYSSr~ - $ 5~.40/yr
FY99/00 proposed - $ 51.40/yr
# of Acres:
1,733.tl ~ial Industrial Acres
ROA/')
Annual Assessment (per assesamnt unit):
North Et/vmnda
LMD 7 & SLD 7
LMD 7 Maintained Areas (in acres):
Ground Cover and Shrubs
Turf
~ Trails
FY98/99
7.54
4,O2
1Z00
ZOO
Total Area
FY99/~
8.82
4.02
!Z00
ZOO
26.84
Annual Aesessment:
FYS~- $
FY99/00 proposed- $ 307.0r-Jyr
# of Parcels:
1,314 Single Family
5 Conammial/Industrial acres
FY98/99 - $ 33.32/yr
FY99/00 proposed - S 33.32~
944 Single Family
$ Cormemial acres
RA,~F I INF
Souif/Eftwanda
LMD 8 & SLD 8
Maintained Areas (in acres):
Total ~
0.23
0.14
Annual Assessmerit (per assessment unit):
FY99/00
0.23
0.14
0.37
FY98/99 - $151.4,~yr
FY99/D0 proposed - S 151.45/yr
# of Parcels:
t08 Single Family
SLD8'
Annual A,~e~,sn~:
~- $ t~.75~r
~ proposed - $1~.7~/r
# of Parcels:
36 Single Family
Red Hill & ftedlage ~
PD-85 Maintained Areas (in acres):
Total Area 84.00
Annual A,~es~nent (per assessment unit):
Annual Assesanent (per dwelling unit):
FYg~- $ 5zoo~
t,988 Remainder Parcels (Ca~n'~/ind or Under)
DATE:
370:
FROM:
B Y
SUBJEC :
May 5. 1999
~h C[.~(...A MONC~,
(1~ ' (2}1' RANC]'tO" :" ' '~"A
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, (.at5 Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistam Engineer
APPROVAl, OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING TO BE VACATED PORTIONS
OF tWO ALLEYS ANI) DISPOSITION OF A PORTION OF CItY OWNED
PROPERTY, GENERALLY WITHIN THE NORTHTOWN AREA, LOCATED ON
THE, SOWHI SIDE OF FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE,
SUBMITTED BY NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
(V-161)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City C:ounc:i~l adopt the attached resolutions ordering the vacation of
portions of two alleys and approving the disposition of a portion of City owned property, generally
within the Northtown Area, located. on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue
and authorize the Ivlayor and the C:ity Clerk to sign said resolutions.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Northtown Housing Development Company (NTHDC) is currently processing CUP 98-30 tbr
construction of a Community Center~ h:'~ conjunction with this processing, NTHDC has requested
the vacation of certain unimproved alleys lhat are contiguous to the proposed Community Center.
these alleys are currently not being used for access by adjacent properties since there are no visible
openings from the adjoining propert:ies. Basically, these alleys are just "paper" alleys that were
created per Map of' the Town of West Cm:;amonga in 1897 and are not needed for public use.
Utility companies, other agencies and City' divisions have been notified of the proposed vacation and
were asked for their comments. There were no objections to the vacation from any of the groups
notified. All the affected and adjacent property owners have been notified by mail of this proposed
vacation and publit: hearing. The ow~ers, mailing names and addresses were taken from the County
Tax Assessor's latest equalized assessn e, nt m!lts.
/7/
CITY COUNCIL STAFF iRE PORT
V- 161 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
May 5, 1999
Page 2
NTHDC, property owner of Lots '7 throug',t~ 10 of Block 5 of the Map of the Town of West
Cucamonga, is requesting that a portion of the City owned alley be incorporated to their property
through a quitclaim process and concurrently proceed with a lot merger. On January 27, 1999, the
Planning Commission deten'ained the proposed quitclaim would contbrm with the General Plan.
The Planning Comtnission also determined the said vacation is consistent with the goals and
objectives of the circulation element of the General Plan and recommended the vacation occur. The
alleys in this area of the City are also not i~'~cluded or required as "community travel routes" of the
General Plan. Through these proceedings, the property ownerwill obtain said portion of City owned
alley and use the land as part of said lots, 7 ffmmgh 10
On April 7, 1999, the City C'ouncil passed Resolution 9%057 declaring its intention to vacate said
portions of alleys and set the date of iMay 5., 1999, at 7:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers,
as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to, the proposed vacation.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:WV:dlw
Attachments
I~dESOLUTION iNO. q q -'/g~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY ()F SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING T()BE VACATED THiO SE PORTIONS OF
CITY STREETS (AISLEYS) GENERALLY WITHIN THE
NORTHTOWN AREA., iLOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON
BOULEVARD, WEST ()F HERMOSA AVENUE
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 99-057:,. passed on April 7, 1999, the Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate those portions of City streets hereinafter more
particularly described., and set the hour of 7 ::00 p.m. on May 5, 1999, in the City Council Chambers,
located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for
hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and
WHEREAS, such public ihearir~g t'ms been held at said time and place, and there were no
protests, oral or written, to such vacation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOI....VED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
as follows:
SECTION 1: That the Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that those portions
of City streets (alleys.), generally within the Northtown Area, located on the south side of Feron
Boulevard, west of Hermosa Avenue are unnecessary for present or prospective public street
purposes, and the City Council hereby ~nakes :its order vacating those portions of said City streets
as shown on Map No. V-161 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
which has been further describ ed in the legal descriptions which are attached hereto, marked Exhibits
"A" and "B", and by reference made a part: thereof.
SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portions of City
alleys no longer constitute a street or public utility easement.
SECTION 3: 'That the subject: vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions,
if any, for existing utilities on record
SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded
in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California
SECTION 5: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it
shall thereupon take effect and be in fbrce
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Those portions of Block 5 of the Map of the Town ofWest Cu6amonga, as recorded in
Book 13 of Maps, pages 1 and 2, records of the County Recorder ofthe County of San
Bernardino, State &California, more particularly described as follows:
PARCEL A:
That portion of Lot 6 of said Block :5 lying westerly ofthe easterly 135.00 feet of said
Block 5,
Contains 2,400 Square Feet
PARCEL B:
That portion of the 20 foot wide unnamed right of way bounded on the west by the
southerly projection of the westerty line &Lot I0 and on the east by the southerly
projection ofthe westerly line o£tihe easterly 5 feet ofLot 7 all orsaid Block 5.
Contains 1,900 Square Feet
See attached Exhibit '"B"'" attached hereto and made a part thereof.
PREPARED BY:
Derbish, Guerra & Associates
833 i Utica Avenue, Suite ! 50
Rancho Cucamonsa, California 91730,
(909) 987-4306 .
Dank E. Guerra
R.C.E. 29224
Date
l-IG/
EXHIBIT "'B"
FERON
I 'F
Z
MAP SHALL ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
0 25 50
SCALE 1'=50'
VoI~/
/ ?~T
MAIN
~,~ ~.~.1 ~'
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
vi C lNl r~' M/A P
V-
ENGIN .~G DIV~CqON RxwrRIT:
RESOLUTION NO. ~ q" j 0 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, FINDING ~rH,AT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN
ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .AND AUTHORIZING THE
DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT
CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WE[ICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT
"D" AND TO CAUSE ~:IE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSON
NAMED TIdEREIN
A Recitals
(i) The City of Rancho Cucfanonga has a fee interest in that certain portion of a City-
owned alley generally the Northtown area, located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of
Hermosa Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, Califomia, and
hereinafter referred to in this Resolution as "said property." A full, true and complete description
of said property is set forth in that copy of deed attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and by this reference
set forth herein.
(ii) California Government Code Section 37350 provides as follows:
"A City may purchase, lease, receive, hold and enjoy real and personal property, and control
and dispose of it for the common benefit"
(iii) California Govemment (:lode Section 37351 provides in pertinent parts, as follows:
"The legislative body (City Council may...dispose of, and convey such property for the
benefit of the City..."
(iv) The Planning Commission of thee City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the
findings on January 27, 1999, that disposing of said portion of City-owned property, as herein
contemplated, would be in conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
(v) Said portion of City-owned property was granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
through a Grant Deed for alley purposes fi:~r which it was granted.
(vi) Said property constitutes a burden on the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is no longer
necessary or convenient for the purposes tbr which it was granted.
(vii) Conveyance of said prope:rly will further the use of said property and benefit the City
of Rancho Cucamonga by deletion of a necessity to maintain said property.
/77
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY V- 161-. NORTHTOWN ALLEY
May 5, 1999
Page 2
(viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution has occurred.
Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, the City C:ouncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find,
determine, and resolve as follows:
1..All facts stated in the Recitals, Part A,, of this Resolution hereby are found to be true and
correct.
2. This Council hereby finds thin fi~e quit claiming of said property to the persons described
in said deed will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. The Mayor and City Clerk hereby are authorized and directed to execute the deed, a full,
true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and cause the same to be recorded
forthwith upon adoption of this Resolutim~.
4. The City C, lerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
Assessor Parcel No.:
209-085-04
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Rancho Cucamonga
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
Street
Address:
c~ty &
State:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LiNE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $
COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED
OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND
' ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING AT T~ME OF SALE.
Signature of Declarant or Agent determining tax. F~n'~ Name
CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
The City of Rancho Cuc~rnonga. a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of California, hereby
REMISES, RELEASES. AND QUITCLAIMS to
'NORTHTCWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
that certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
described and shown on the attached Exhibits "E" mO "F".
ACCEPTED:
CITY OF RANCHO C~GA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BY:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
ATTACH COMPLETED NOTARY ACKaNOWLEDGEMENT(S)
E X H I B :~: T "D"
179
EXHIBIT "E"
Legal Description
(AREA TO BE QUITCLAIMED)
That portion of Block 5 of the Map of the: Iown of West Cucamonga, as recorded in Book 13 of
Maps, pages 1 and 2, records of the County Recorded of the County of San Bemardino, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
That portion of the 20-foot wide unnamed right-of-way bounded on the west by the southerly
projection of the westerly line of Lot 10 and on the east by the southerly projection of the
westerly line of the easterly 5 tbet of Lot 7 all of said Block 5.
As shown on Exhibit "E" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
FERON
/!
'F
!
, 5
40'
MAP SHALL ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
0 25 50
SCALE
/8/