Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/09/05 - Agenda Packet r1 LJ r CITY r, ' COUNCIL i ~ ~I~ D ~, ~ ~ A ~ CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS ~! 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 741 pm September 5, 1990 CIVIC Cenfei Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga. California 91'730 •~• City CouncilmemDers iJennis L. Stout, .No.vo. Pamela 1. Wright, ca~~<dm.me.. Deborah N. Brown, ,aayo. v~nm ~~~ Charles 1. Buquet, co~~<um.mer. William 3. Alexander, ce~~~nm.mK~ • ~ Lack Lam, o.. Smnuer~ Debra J. Adams, u.. ci:.k City OIRce: 989-IBSI Lions Part: 980-3145 PACE City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 jllij I ii II ~i i, ~I ~i _' ~ _L~ '~i All items submitted for tho City Council Agenda wuet be in ~~, writing. The deadline for aubmitt ing these items is 5:00 p.m. '~,, on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's ' Office receives all cuch itemv. A. CALL TO ORDBR !i 1. Ao11 Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout , , Brown _, and Wright j 9. ANNODNCBNBNTS/PRSSBNTATIONS ' 1. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing Tnomas Mar ich ~, ae "National Corrections Supe rvieor of the Year", '~, C. CONNUNICATIONS PRON TNB PVALIC This is tDe Lice end plane for the general public to eddresa the Citp Council. Stale law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue sot previously included on the Agenda. The City Cauacil map receive testiwnp and set the utter for a subcequeat meeting. Comments era to be limited to five miautea per individual. D. CONSENT CaT~ewDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine end nos-controversial. They will De acted upon by the Council at one time without dissuasion. Anp stem may be removed by a Counc ilmeaber or member of the audience for di acuae ion. 1. Approval of Minu tee: Jcly 18, 1990 (Wright absent) August 1, 1990 Auquet 12, 1990 2. Approval of Werrante, Register Noe. 8/8/90, 8/15/90, and 8/22/90 and Pa/roll ending N/lfi/90 for the total amount nt G6.1VV 7l..1 nA 3. Approval of the advert ieing of the ^NOtice Inviting Bids" for the Landscape and Irrigation Metntenance Contract fcr Landscape Malntenenca Aeeeeament Districts Numbers 1 and 5, to be funded by Account Numbers 40- 4130-6027, 60-4130-6028 and 44-4130-6027, qq-g130-6028 respectively. 1 PAGE City Council Aqenda September 5, 1990 2 i j i i ' III ~'i ~~ ~i i 4. i ~'~ ~~ ~~ i it ~. ~~~ i i i I il~ ', ~~, I~ "',, '~, ', ~ . I l i i '' ii I ~ I II it i I '~ I ~I If 6. RESOLUTION NO. 90-337 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFOANIA, APPROVING i THE PLANS AND SPECZFICAT IONS FCR THE "LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION HAINTENANCF. CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE accpgcuoym n___.._.,__ .. _ .......... ...... _ ... SAID CITY AND AUTHORI2INGLAND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval o£ the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Lard acape and Trrigat ion Maintenance ' Contract Eor General Pund and Landscape Maintenance '~ Asacsament Districts 3a and 36, to be funded by account ' nwnbere 01-4647-6028, 42-4130-6027, 42-4130-6028 and 46- 4130-6027, 46-4130-6028 reepect ively. RESOLUTION NO. 90-338 A RESOLUTION OP THE CZTY COUNCIL OP THS CITY I OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS POR THE 'i "LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOA GENERAL FUND ANU LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 3A AND 36", ~ IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING a:C C:.: C:.G-.:: IJ M:: L:.I lu6 "v nc~.civc oiua Approval o£ the advertising of the "Notice Inviting i Bitls" for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance ' Contract for the Landscape Maintenance Assessment ~, Districts Numbers 2 and 4, to be funded by Account ', Numbers ~1-4130-6027, 41-4130-6028 and 43-4130-5027, ' 43-4130-602D reepect Lvely. RESOLUTION NO. 90-339 ~ A n-cSOLUYi uN OF THE Celt COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS ANO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE rnumPa0g s..o .. ........... .... ... . .._ ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS .,NUMBERS 2 AND •4,,"~IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIEING ANO DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO AECEIVS BIDS Approval to ce~ect all bide for the Baee Line Median, Phaee I, located from Haven Avenue to Valencia Street. pace City council Agenda September 5, 1990 3 7. Approval of the establishment of Park and Recreation Commission Ad Hoc Advisory Committees. 8. Approval to destroy records which are no longer required as provided under Government Codo Section 34050. P$SOLUTION NO. 90-340 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COONUiL ~ - .._ OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH AAE NO LONGER AEQUTRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 9. Approval of Parcel Map 11286, and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 £or Parcel Map 11286, located on the east aide o£ Milliken Avenue 600 feet north of chuzch Street, submitted by Lewis Development Company. :3ESOLVTION NO. 90-341 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCZL OP THE CITY OP NANCHG CUCAF.ONGA, rALSFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11286 (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAH NO. 11286) RESOLUTION NO. 90-342 A AE SOLUTION OF TH'm :'TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CAL IFOANIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATSON OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DTBTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL MAP 1126fi 10. Approval of Parcel Map 12596 antl ordering the Annexation -„ __ ~ ,,,,~„t_„_, __ nlgt ri r.: No. 3 end Street Lighting Maintenance^Dietrict Non. a..d 6 fcr Parcel Map 12596, located ai the noztheaet oorner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Bou ieva rd, eubmitted by OAS _.. snore. RESOLUTION NO. 90-343 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALTPORNI A, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NllMBER 12596 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 12596) PACE City Council Agenda ~ September 5, 1990 4 RESOLVTION NO. 90-344 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CAL IFOANIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 __.- _ ..... FAECEL n,.P r25i6 11. Approval of Parcel Nap 12761, and Ordering the ' Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for i Parcel Map 12781, located at the soot hwoet corner of Jereey Boulevard and Rochester Avenge, submitted by ~I~ Stanton JeYSey Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 90-345 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITX COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPP.OVING PARCEL MAP NO. 127B1r (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 12781) RESOLUTION NO. 90-346 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OP THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, OADEAINO ...G ,u.u un ue CEN'fAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12781 12. Approval to award and execute a Pro £eeeional Bervice _° Agreement (CO 90-135) for the preparation of traffic signal coordination timing Plana for Poothill Boulevard to Herman Eimmel and Associates in the amqunt of $14,9D5.00 (513,550.00 plus 10F contingency) to be Funded from Redevelopment Agency, Account No. 16-503000. li. Annrnval to ~~~e - , ~~„~ exec._ _ _ ._..._.._ _ _. _. mp-~-_.. Security and Ordering' the nAnnexation. tom Lnndacaps Maintenance District No. 3 antl Straec LInbH ng Mai^^°nanx C~a,...c~ RJa. . and o for cuP BB-46, locatetl at the southwest corner of Baee Line Road and Hellman Avenue submitted by Parkplaoe Cocamonya. City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 RBSOLVTION NO. SO-347 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMHNT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY FOR CONDITIONAL PERMIT USE NO. 88- 46 RESOLUTION NO. 90-348 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O£ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDEATNG THS ANNBXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 FOR CVP BB-46 14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, improvement security end Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for DR 87-66, located on the southwest hornet of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Stanton Jersey Partners, a Cal ifornLa Limited Fart nerahip. A83OLVTION NO. 90-349 A RESOLVT ION OP TXfi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECVRZTY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87-56 RESOLUTION NO. 90-350 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CZTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, ORDERING TMfi ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGNT'I NO NAIMTENANCS DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 POR DR E7-66 15, Approval to release Sewer and Wat or B^nde for Trsct r3sbs roc ated on the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman-BULlock Aoad. Release: Pnithful Perfonnancs Bond (Sewer) $333,000.00 Paithful Performance Bond (Water) $491,500.00 PAGE PACE City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 ~ 6 16. Approval to Accept Improvement e, Aeleaee of Ronda and Notice o£ Completion for Tract 13650 located on the aoutheaat corner of Foothill eouievard and Baker Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $219,079.00 Acuept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 21,907.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-351 A RESOLUT:J:: v TiiE CITY COUNCIL OF T'NS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC iNPROVEMSNTB FOR TRACT 13fi 50 AND AUTBORI2ING THE FILING OP A NOTICB OF COMPLETIGN POA THE WORK ^ 6 CONeENT ORDINANCBB The following Drdinanaa have Dad public heaziuga at ibs ties of first readivg. Second rudiaga Ora expected to be routine avd nov-covtroveraial. They will be acked upoa by the Council et ens tLe without diacuuiov. The City Clerk will read the title. Avy itq can De raaavW for diaeusaiov, •. CUNNIU6 O R G B C T Y ANO OCCUPANCY OP PORTED CITY PROPERTY ORDINANCE NO. 425 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, REGVLATING PUBLIC ENTRY AND OCCVPANCY OP POSTED CITY PROPERTY The following itees have beau advertlaed and/or posted as public bearivga a required by law. The chn±r will open the a:aatiuy to receive pantie teatiwvy. City Counril Agenda September 5, 1990 PAGE ' 1. CONS D SS N STIW SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan pertaining to the proposed removal of exietlnr< Eucalyptus windtowu ae a result of the alignment Ot Summit Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue and other street al ignmente. (COntisued ' frw August 15, 1490) ' ORDINANCE N0. 424 (fir et reading) ' AN ORDINANCE OF TH6 CITY COllNCIL OP THE CITY ~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING I ~ ETIWA.4DA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01, ~ ANENDIN6 PIOURE 5-13 OF TF~ 6TIWANDA ~ i ~ SPECIFIC PLAN AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT t i i i THEREOP .. S N D R C US OP ~ CONDITIONS - A resolution, when adopted, which will ~ ~ comply with Lhe provision of the State of California . i Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7. RESOLUTION NO. 9U-352 I j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY `I OP IU1NCf70 CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, HARING ~ ~ rixPR{SSH FINUIN09 AND DETERMINATIONS TNAT MODIPICATIONS TO THE CITY'S BUILDING CODE, i I AS ADOPTED HY OAD INANCB NO. 426 ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY SECAUSS OF LOCAL j ~ CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS ~ ~ I C D C C R ~ 5 R H NGS N N ',, I RELATED ACCESSORY BVILDINGE i ___~ ___ City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 GRDIEANCE NO. 426 (first Yesding) PN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ANENOING TITLE 19, BVI LDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFBAENCE STANDARDS NPPA 13D AND NPPA 11R, ItC:TR PCSLISA-aD BY ice' NATiUNAL FIRE PAOTBCTION ASSOCIATION, REQVIAZNG THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES AND CERTAIN BUILDINGS ACCESSORY THERETO, WITH CERTAIN AHHNONENTS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTION TO SAID CODES ONSIO O SES TRACT 14192 - HIX DEVELOPNENT - Appeal of the Planning Commleslon`e decision to require the undergrounding of util itiee and the construction of street and storm drainage Lnprovesrente beyond the project boundnriee for a residential eubdivielon of 69 single-family lots on 19.7 acres of land located south of 39th Street between Y.allman Avenue and Aatethyei Street in the Low Residential District - APN 202-061-12, 14, 40 and b4. RESOLUTION NO. 90-353 n rmwwraun ur 'a'eNS C1'1'Y WOtiCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORIIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO DELE^IB POUR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL POR TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 POR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 65 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 19.7 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED SOUTN OF 19TH STREBT BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND AHETHYST STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND HAICI NG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEASOF 4. CONSIDERATION OP TIME E%TENSION POR DE91GN RHVIHW SB-03 - A.E. SNITH - An appeal of the Planning Cwrtnieeion'e decision to add the standard school mitigation condition to the dove lapment or a0 apartment unite on 1.OB scree _f laid Sn t`.e Rem nrriigh Reeidentiei metrict (14-24 dwelling unite per~acra), located at the end of Sierra Madre Avenue, wear of Edwin Street - APN 207-251-22. PAGF. City Council Agenda Septembor 5, 1990 PAGE I RESOLUTION NO. 9D-356 Il i A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY ls OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOA A TINE EATSNSION FOR DESIGN RBVIBW flfl-03, AND DENYING TFIS APPEAL ~ ~ ~ ~ ' THEREOF, THE DEVELOPMENT OP 20 APARTMENT ulvI35 ON i.OE ACRES OF LAND 1N THS MRDIUM- ~ I ~ i HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRZ CT (14-26 DWELLING i ~, I, UNITS PBA ACRE), LOCATED AT THE BND OF ii '~, I, li SIERRA HADAE AVENUE, WEST OF EDWIN STREET ' ~ ~ I ~ AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ~ ~ - I ~'I i '~ ~'' 5. CONSIDfiRATION OF SNVIRONMBNTAL ASEESSMENT AND INDVSTRIAL i t SPECIFIC PLAN AM$ND.~NT E9-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I ' l - A request to amend the circulation element of the Industrial Specific Pian (SUDarea 5) for the deletion i i of Seventh Street betwnen Hermosa Avenue end Center I ! Street - APN 209-261-09 and 30. li ORDINANCE NO. 427 (fire[ leading) AN ORDINANCE OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY I i I OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING i ~ INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDI4ENT 89-03, i AMENDING FIGURE II-3 AND FIGURE IV-7, AND t i RAKING FINDINGS IN 9VPPORT THEREOF ~ I ~I O. PUBLIC HEARIN09 i ~' The following itans Dave no legal publication or posting ~ i I requireeeats. The Chair will open the eeeting to receive ~ public testi>tony. 1. CONSID RA ON AN I C S IN C PROV S O S I CI OF THE BROWN ACT RESCINDED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE i j, ORDINANCE NO. 428 (fire[ reading) ~ j I AN ORDINANCE OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ' i OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ADDING NEW i ~ SEC''TiONS 2.i<.V3D ANU L.12.U4U TO CHAPTER ~ I 2.12 OF TITLE 2 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA i MUNICIPAL CO06~ THEREBY IISQUIRING POSTING OP AGENDAS AND PROVIDING OPPORTUNIT IEB FOR I THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS TH6 CITY COUNCIL pace City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 10 !, H. CITY MANAGBR'B BT711'P RHPORTS I ~I The following item do not legally require nap public testimony, although the Chair may open the seating for public I input. it ! 1. RE U 3 F O FINAL I SPECTZ N 0 I !I i 'i, REL-c ASE OP uIILLT:-c5 OE LO: 2w. :HAC: :36.G ' I '~ 2. CONSIDERATION OP ADOPTION OF WATER CONSERVATION ~ I ' I RESOLUTION ! ''; I RESOLVTION NO. 90-355 i I I li A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~ I OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING ~~ i ADOPTION OP CONSERVATION MEASURES TO ~ I I MITIGATE THE SFPECTS OF TRS 1990 CALIFORNIA j DROUGHT '~ ' 3. REPORT ON I LEME ATIO' OF FALSE ALARM O N Cfi 4. S E GN TIO 0-0 - D ~ j i ! I t ~. CH 7 F V - A proposal to consider an application to deny a ~ ! Landmack Designation for the Red Chief Motel and Cafe. ~ Historic Preservation Commission also requests policy '~ I euecuon zegaremq a potenuaa uanamazx ueargnauon rez I the Bear Gulch area which would Lnclude tae sycamore Inn, the significant trees, the Oso Bear statue and i, I - potential archaeological resources (the Bite of the '~, '~ ! proposed sycamore Village project) but exclude the Red ~ . i ''; Chief Motel and Cafe - APN 207-101-17. ' i I' S. STATUS OF RECYCLING CENTERS IN SHOPPING CENTERS ~~ I 6. CONS O O C 88 0 U I ~' ~I ~ CREST - Master Tentative Tract e, Pinai Development Plan ' I ~ ! Map, and various Tentative Trnet Mape for 1,293 single I family residential unite, 6.3 acres of conmezcinl, 4.56 ~~ ', ~ acre park Bite, and 7.17 acre school Bite for University j Crest Planned Development Proposal on 425.16 scree of ' i ~; '~~ iauu iooaLeu uuc iii vt Hiy iri and Aveuu e, ewutir wE uti:ity I rorridor, east of Oay Creek Channel, with portions west j ~'~ of Henley Avenue end portions west of Btlwande Avenue within the City's sphere of Inf luance. The proposal also includes the dedication ae pexlnansnt open apace of 675 acres located within the National Poreet. 7. STATUS REPORT ON CENSUS RESULTS City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 II 8. GRADE SEPARATION AT POOTH ILL BOULEVARD AND SOUTHERN '~ PACIPIC RAILROM. COVNCIL DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH III FORMAL DESIGN FOR GAAD6 SEPARATION it , I I I I. COilNCIL BVSINESS ~'~, ''~ ~li ~ The followiaq ita'+: hire been requested by the City Couae it ~ I ~, for discussion. Thep are not public hearing itgs, although ~, '~, I the chair esy open the eeatiag for public input. j ~~ ~ ~ 1. DISCUSSION OF BUS STOPS ON HAVEN AVENUE (COnt inved froe ~i 'i ~ August 15, 1990) ~' 2, CONSIDERATION OF CONTAIBUT ING S1 000 00 TO THE INLAND II I EMPIRE DESIGN INSTITUTB ~' 3. DISCVSSION OF ENTERING IPITO A CONTRACT WITN MCALLISTER DESIGN TO DEVELOP A GRAPHICS PACIUGE FOA RANCHO ~ CUCAHONGA POLTCB VEHICLES I I 4. DISCUSSION OF ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT W'TH MCALLISTER DESIGN TO DEVELOP A GRAeHIC3 PACRAGE FOR A SEAL FOA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO}1S.A '~ I ~ 5. CONS IDERATIUN OF A POLICY fi%TENOINO SALARY AND BENEPITS I ~' ~ TO EMPLOYEES WHO AAE CALLED INTO ACTIVE MILITARY SEAVTCE , I Oi 'T' OF THE CONFLICT IN THE MIDDLE EAST (ORAL REPORT BY HAYOA STOUTI ~, II 6. DISCUSSION OF CONDUCTING COMMUNITY AWARENESS SEMINARS '~. REGARDING GANGS AND DRUGS If i 7. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING POLICY REGARDING USE OF CITY OUNC L C B R9 CO OE OOM ANO HAVE ~~ CONFERENCE. ROOM ~' ~ '~ 8. DISCUSS ON O 0 ES AND TEN ANCE P PEC AL COUNC I MEETINGS WTTH COMMISSIONS AND OTHER AGENCIES 9. ISOUSSION 0 C PE OF ENVIRO EN NAGE T ~i '~ j it '~, COMMISSION (Continue to October 3. 39901 III ~~ S_IDENTIlIGTION OF ITEMS _F~@~ZT MEETING i TAia i• the tiNa for Citp Council to identifp the itsu they plsh to diecuq et the Oext uetivg. Thge itga rill not De diacusgd rt Chia Ngting, only identified for the next ~ I I eeetiag. _. _ _ _. -_ _. i PAGE 11 g City Council Agenda i p ay8 =s September 5, 1990 ~ eP o° " 3II ~ PAGE 12 i __ ~ ~ [. ONB PR IC i This is the Lire and place for Lae geaeral public to addzeu i i t Lae Ciiy Comcil. State lsw prohibits the City Council frog addressing soy issue not prrviouslp included on Lhs Agenda. '~i The Cit7 Comcil up rsceiva tastiaonp end wt Lae ratter for a subsrqueaL reatiag. CoYSats ere to be 1Lited to five i niscLes par iadivid-.:a2. ~~ ~j i j L. ADTOVRNIDII7T III it MHHTINO TO ADJOURN TO BZHCDTIVS 8666ION TO DIBCVSB PHRBONNHL II i MATTHAS. j I ' I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk oP the City oP Rancho Cucamonga, j hereby certify Last a true, accurnte copy of the foregoing j agenda was posted on August 31, 1990, seventy-two (72) hours ~ prior to the meeting per Government Cods SA953 at 10500 Civic I i j ~ Center Drive. Ili i I i i I ~ i j I I ~ ! I July 18, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Recular Meetinc A. CALL TO ORDNR A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, July 1H, 1990, in the Council Chambers local ad at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 O.m. by Mayor Denn ie L. Stout. Present were Councilmemberet William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Char lea J. Suquet II, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Hanagaz; Jerry B. Pu lwood, Deputy CLty Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Olen Jones, Sr. ADA Ana lyat; Brad Buller, C ~y Pla.:ner; Larry Handareon, princ ipai Planner; Miki Brett, Aeeociate Planner; Anna Liea Hernandez, Assistant Planner; Shintu Boee, Deputy City Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Joe Stofar Aeeociate Bnginear; Mlke Long, Supervisor of Public Works Ineoectxs: Jerry Grant. Ruildi nn nffiriul. wa.~: w<,.,.: ~o Dieaeter Prepacedneee Manager; Jana Eilie, Disaster Pteparednene specialist; Ingrid Hlair, GIS Supervisor; Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager; Jim Mazt, Admin ietrat ive Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Officer; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Aflnc ho Cucamonga Pire Protection District; Lt. Bob Peppier, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clez k. Absent was Councilmembert Pamela J. Wright. B. ANNOUNCEMRNTS/PA668NTATION3 B1. __eae.^.taticr o_ .r...,lamatio;. DoQa.-L5y ....iy a_ ac ke auJ Recrnat ion Month. Mayor Stout presented the proclamation. 02. presenter ion of Proclamation Commending Marti Higg Cne and Staff of the Emergency Preparedness Department for CSTI Training Exercise. Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Harti Higgins, Dieaeter Preparedness Manager. City Covnc it Minutee July I8, 1990 Page 2 63. Presentation to Anna Lisa Hernandez in Recognit Lon of her National AICP Award ae a Student in the Field of PLanninq. Mayor Stout presented the proclamation to Anna Liea Hernandez. R A f• f f C__COMMOMICATIONS FROM TEE P IC C1. Mark Solomon, 1812 N. Placer, asked what the statue was of the skateboard ordinance. He felt the Rancho Cucamonga Police Officers were not enforcing the ordinance as it was approved. Mayor BLOUt suggested to Mr. Salomon that he meet with Jerry Fulwood, Ceputy city Manager, to diecuea this problem and to find a solo[ ion in working with the Police Department. C2. Pete Alexakus, Woods II tract, stated the City hoe placed liens on hie home for work that is not cwvpleted. He stated he would like someone to determine what work still needs to be done and Sf an extension could be granted because the liens were very disturbing. . . . . ~ ~ D. CONSENT CALENDAR Heyor Stout asked if anyone from the audience wished to remove Item D32 slots there had been contact matle with the City Clerk's of firs o~.i: c. «:,,« .. tore. _, _. __ There was no response. U1. Approval of Minutee: June 20, 1990 D2. Approval of Warrant e, Rsgi star Noe. 6/13/90, 6/X/90, 6/27/90 and 6/28 /90; and Payroll ending 6/21/90 for the total amount of $9,657,090.68. D3. Approval to recelve and file current Investment Schedule ae of June 30, 1990. D4. Alcoholic eeverage Application foi On Sale Beer 6 Wine Eating place foY R 6 R Bakery, Forbco Hanaqement Ccrporat ion, 9550 Baee Line Road. 06. giconolic Beverage Application for On Sale Baer S Wrna Eating Place for Dragon express, Teh-Chuan and Saho Fang Lu I, 9028 Archibald Avenue. D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application Yor On gale Beet d Wine Eating Place Yot Caleio's, Cathcyn L. find Joseph J. Celato, 9640 Canter Avenue, Suite 150. D7. Alcoholic Beverage Appl LCatlon for Cn Sale Seer for B K SuDr Doo Young and Hyun Yank Lee, 9026 Rrch ibald Avenue. City Council Minutes July 1D, 1990 Page 3 D8, Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Reer & Wine Eating Place for China Duck, Duc Bao and Mei Tei Chau, 8421-B Hav¢n Avenue. D9. Approval of Surplus Property Diapoeition - Waiver of Publication. D10. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parta i and II far the proposed Banyan Street Improvement Project from Eastwood Avenue to Hellman Avenue? and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefcr. RESOLUTION NO. 90-276 A RESOLUTION O? THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STVDY AND ISSUANCE OP A CATEGORICAL E%EMPTION POR THE PROPOSED BANYAN STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM EASTWOOD AVENUE TO HELLMAN AVENUE 011. Approval of a Raaolut ion confirming the Importance of the Kenyon Way Railroad Crossing at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing east of Milliken Avenue. RESOLVTION NO. 90-275 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CAL IPORM IR, REgUEST:HG :HMEDIATE CONSIDERATION BY THE SOUTNEAN PACIPIC RAILROA- FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TH6 EBNYAN WAY RAILROM CROSSING AND URGING THE PROC6aS ING THEREOF D12. Approval to order the annexation of cop R9-17, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6. AESOLUTI ON NO. 90-276 A REBOLUT ION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, ORDERING THE ANNHXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 89-17 D13. Approval of a Federal Government Resolut ton (CO 90-100) deeignat Lng individuals as repreeentetives of the City of Rancho L•ucamongn for the acquiaitlon of federal surplus property. D14. Approval to execute contracts for computer hardware/ software maintenance with AC3 Computing (CO 90-101), Cal Comp (CO 90-102), NBI Incozporet¢d (CO 90- 303), P[Lme Computer (c0 90-104), Technic Computer Services (CO 90-105), Tektronix (CO 90-106) and United Computer syeteme (CO 90-107) in the total amount of $111,333.00 to be funded from Contract Sa[vicee Accounts 33-4130-6028 for Fie cal Year 1990/91. City Council Hinutee .TUly 18, 1990 Page 4 D 19. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 90- 108) for preparation of a draft specific plan for the Etiwanda North Area to C.M. Engineering in the amount of $18,700.00 to be funded from Contract Services Account No. 01-4333-6028 (PY 89/90). D16. Approval to execute Agreement For Inert al lation Of Public Improv e~~ent (CO 90-109) between Pred C. Smith and Elyse 8. Smith and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Smith parcel for the Nineteenth Street project from carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. RESOLUTION NO. 90-277 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PUHLZC IMPROVEMENT PROM FAED C. SMITH AND ELYSE E. SMITH AND AUTNORIZINO THE MAYOR RND CITY CLHRR TO SIGN SAME D 17. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement (CO 90-110) between Melvin W. Smith and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Eor Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Smith percel for the Nineteenth Street project Yrom Carnelian Street io Amethyst Street. AESOLUTION NO. 90-278 A RHSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTINO AN AOREEMBNT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM MEI.VIN W. SMTTH ANn AIITNORTETNG THR MAYOR ANU CITY CLERA TO SIGN SAHE D1S. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement (Co 90-111) between Joan Getee, Ruesell Plttant e, Diane Fittante St. Clair, and Salvatore Fiiiante and the City of Aancho Cucamonga £oz Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Flttente percel for the Nineteerth Street project from Carnelian Street to Amet hyet Street. RESOLUTION NO. 90-279 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CRLIPORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOA INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM SOAN GATES, RUSSELL FITTANTE, DIANE FITTANTE ST. CLAIA, AND SALVATOAE FITTANTE AND AUTHORIZING THfi !L`YOR AND CITY CLERE Tb SIG:7 SAME 019. Approval to execute Agreement for In et al lation of Public Improvement (CO 90-112) between Cary L. Youell end Annette K. Youell end the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Youell parcel for the Nineteenth Street project from Carnelian Stress io Amethyst Street. City Council Hinutea July 18, 1990 Peke 5 REEOLUTION NO. 9G-280 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AH AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PURL IC IMPROVEMENT FAOH GARY L. YOUELL AND ANNETTE K. YOUELL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME D20. Apptoval to execute Agreement for Inet al lei ion of Public Improvement (CO 90-113) between The Department of Veterans Affairs of the State of California and Glenr. N. Ru:utz an3 the City ct Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north port loo of the Ru rutz parcel for the Nineteenth Straet project from carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. RESOLUTION NO. 90-2 H1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROM THE DEPARTMENT OP VETERANS APFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND GLENN H. KVRUTZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAMH D21. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement (co 90-114) between Stanley V. Pulton and Beverly A. Fulton and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Pulton portal for the Hinetaenth Straet pro jet[ from Carnelian Straet to Amethyst Street. AP.SOLUTTON NO. 9n-9 A9 A AESOLUTIO:! OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A71NCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUELIC IMPROVEMENT FROM STANLEY V. FULTON AND BEVERLY A. FULTON AND AUTHORIZING TH6 HAYOA AND CITY CLERK i0 SIGN SAME D22. Approval to execute Agreement For Installation of Public Improvement (co 90-115) between Mohammad Haidarian and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Haidarian parcel for the Nineteenth Street project from Carnelian Street to Amethyst St zest. RESOLUTION NO. 9D-283 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ..UCA.YCNGA, CAL:o ORN: A, ACCEPTING ~ AGREEMENi POA INSi A:.LASi.ON OP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROM MONAMMAD HAIDAR IAN AND AUTHORIEI NG THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME D23. Approval to execute Agreement for Lnetallat ion of Public Improvement (CO 90-116) between Charles Erwin Hunniford Sr., and Vivian Lorraine Hunniford and the airy of Rancho Cucamonga Por Straet Improvements located along the north portion of the Hunniford parcel for the Nineteenth Street project from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. City Council Hinutee July 18, 1990 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 90-286 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THfi CT TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING nN AGRSEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IlIPAOVEMENT FROH CHARLES ERWIN HUNNIFOAD SR., AND VIVIAN LORAAINE HIiNNIPORD AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAiU3 U 26. npproval to execute Agreement for installation of Public Improvement (CO 90-117) between Aldo Zenro9eo and Alba Zanroeeo and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Zanroeeo parcel for the Nineteenth Street project from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. RESOLUTION NO. 90-285 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM ALDO ZANROS50 AND ALGA ZANAOSSO AND AUTHORI2I NG THE MAYOR AND CITY CLBRR TO SIGN SAME D25. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement (CO 90-118) between Oennie Ray Srown and Jacquelynn L. Brown and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Brown parcel for [he Nineteenth Street project from Carnelian Street to Amathy^`. Street. RESOLUTION NO. 90-286 n rtnawnus lUN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROM OENNIS AAY BROWN AND JACQUELYNN L. BROWN AND AUTHORIZING TH8 HAYOA AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE D26. Approval to execute Agreement for InetallatSOn of Putl is Improvement (Co 90-119) between Dsbra Dea Dawn Dutton and the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga For Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Dutton parcel far the Nlneteenth Street project from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. RESOLUTION NO. 90-287 A RBSOLUT ION OF TNR CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROM ORRpA DEP. U2.NM DL'TTCIi AiiD ...,.....niZLHG IHE mAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME D27. Approval to execute Agreement for Inet ellei ion of Public Improvement (CO 90-120) petween Tuyet Lan Tren and Debra D. Dutton end the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the T an and Dutton parcel for the Nlneteenth street project from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. City Council Minute July 18, 1990 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 90-258 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COLViCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOA INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM TUYET LAN TRAM AHD DEBRA D. DUTTON AND AUTHORIE ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERE TO SIGN SAME D25. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement (CO 90-121) between Jimmy Ezra Hall and Pamela Ruth Hall and the City oY Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Nall parcel for the Nineteenth Street project from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street. RESOLUTION GO. 40-259 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM JIMMY EERA FW,L AND PAtffiLA ADTH HALL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEAR TO SIGN SANE 029. Approval to 0xecute Agreement for Inetallat tan of Public Improvement (CO 90-122) between Oscar w. Phil Lipe and Geraldine A. Phillips and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street Improvements located along the north portion of the Phillips parcel Eor the Nineteenth Street project from Carnelian Street to A.met by st Street. RESOLUTION NO. 90-290 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM OSCAR W. PHILLIPS AND GERALDINE A. PHILLIPS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE D30. Approval to execute Agreement for In etallation of Public Improvement (CO 90-123) between T.N. Reevae and the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Reevae parcel for the Nineteenth Street project Erom Carnelian Street to Amethyst Stteet. AESOLVTION NO. 90-291 A AESOLUT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGAEBMENT FOA INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC T_MPROVEMENT FROM T.H. AERVES ANO AUTHORISING THE MAYOR ANU CITY CLERE TO ^e IGN SAME D31. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 3 (cG 90-019) for Havert Avenue Gateway Entry Monument £or construction of utility crossing sleeves fot the future entry monument, in Haven Avenue in the amount o£ $18,000.00 and euthotire the Adminietratlve Services Director to expand an additional $18,000.00, over the original contingency approved by City Council, from the Beautlf ication Fund Account No. 21-6647-8719. Clty council Hinutee July 18, 1990 Page 8 032. Approval to execute Contract Change order No. 2 (CO 90-050) for the Rochester Avenue Parkway Heautificatlon Improvement Project in the amount of $26,480.00 and authorize the Administrative Services ^iractor to expend an addit Sonel $18,600.00, over the original contingency approved by City Council, from the Heautificat ion P1and Account No. 21-4647-8435. D33. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Monwoentation each deposit for Tract 13280, located north Of Baee Lins Road between Milliken and Rcchezter Avenues, submitted by Tha Luek Company end zeleaee of previously aubmittetl Improvement Agreement and Monumentation deposit accepted by City Council on January 18, 1989, fzam The Willlem Lyon Company. RESOLVTION NO. 90-292 A RESOLVTION OF TF@ CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND HONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT POR TRACT 13280 AND RELEASING THB IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PAEVIOVSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 1B, 1989 034. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 7645 Alta cueeta submitted by Dave Boggs. RESOLUTION N0. 90-293 A RSSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIPOANIA, APPROVING IMPROVEt~NT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY iMA ]Ad5 •i ma nrnmemr. D35. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12620, located on the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street, submitted by Rancho Parke I. AEGOLOT ION NO. 90-294 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREENENT fiXTENSION AND IHPAOVEMBNT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12420 036. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12671-1 thin -4, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue anQ Mountain View Drive, aubmitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 90-295 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVENBNT AORSEHENT E%TBNSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY POR TIUICT 12671-1 THRU -4 City Council Minutes July 18, 1990 Paqe 9 D37. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12832 (Day Creek BoulevaYd)r located on proposed Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by The will iam Lyon Company. ABSOLUTION NO. 90-296 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IHPAOVRt~NT AGRERHRNT EXicNSLOIi AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POA TRACT 12832 {DAY CREKE BOULEVARD) D38. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13279, located on the south aide of Highland Avenue between Rochester Avenue and Mi11iY.en Avenue, Submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 90-297 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVBMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 13279 n39. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 33318 Landscape, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Mnnzanita Drive, submitted by Mayflower eayoun. RESOLUTION NO. 90-298 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TMV rr+y __ ,--,,,,,,~ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMSNT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SHCVAITY POR TRACT 13318 LANDSCAPE D40. Approval to execute Smprovement Agreement Extension for Tract 13359, located on the east aide of Sapphire Avenue between Orchard Street end Jennet Street, submitted by X. X- Heim, Incorporated. RESOLUTION N0. 90-299 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORNIAr APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%THNSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POA TRACT 13359 D41. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13748 Banyan Street Bridge, located on Banyan street et Dssr Creak, submitred ny q,_r_ Pmck. RHSOLUTION NO. 90-300 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SHCURITY FOA TRACT 13748 BANYAN STRHET BRIDGE City Council Hinutee Suly 18, 1990 Page 10 D42. Apptoval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 9897, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Tetra Vi eta Parkway, submitted by Lewis Homes. AESOLUTION NO. 90-301 A RESOLUTION OP Tt~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFOANIA, APPROVING IMPROVElDINT AGAEEMENT E%TEN5ION ANO IMPROVEIfeNT SECURITY POR PARCEL MAP 9897 D43. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Haven Avenue Improvements, located on the eaeT. aide of Haven Avenue between Church Street and ease Line Aoad, submitted by Lewis Homes. Ae50LUTION NO. 40-302 A RESOLUTION OP THE V'ITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVfiMSNT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SBCVRITY FOR HAVEN AVENUE ZMPROVBMENT3 D44. Approval to accept improvements, Aeleaee of Honda and Notice of Completion Eor: Tract 12fid2 32976-49 Landscape located on the southeast corner of Millik n A n e and Benvan Street Release: Faithful Performance Bond lStYeetl SR72.Dnn nn Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 82,200.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-303 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS F!1R TRACT 12642, 12935-44 LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIEZNG THE SILING OF A NOTICE OP COHPLfiTION FOA THE WORE DR 87-d2 1 E t d th t»th e'de f Civic Cfl t Y D i e between ^tlcg Avenue and Red Oak St rest Ae lease: Part hful Performance Hond (St rest) $ 1,500.00 Rd80LUTION NO. 90-304 A RESOLUTION OF T'.'. CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CAL IFORf7 L{, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87-42 AND AUTHOR I2IN0 TpE PILING OF P. :fOTICE OF CGnPLETION FOR THE WOAX City Council Y.inutee July 1S, 1940 Pnye 11 DR 88-43 1 tad th no th a t f H rm A n e d Sh on Circle Release: Faithful Performance Bond (St rest) 5 3,300.00 RSSOLUTION NO. 90-305 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 85-43 AND AUTHORIZING TE3E FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE WOAR D45. Approval to accept thre¢ Traffic Signals located at the intersections of Haven Avenue and VictOYiB Street, Baee Line Aoad and Ramona Avenue, end 888¢ Line Aoad and Valencia Avenue, Contract No. 89-114, fls complete, rele8ee the Donda antl authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion^. RESOLUTION NO. 90-306 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TNfi PUBLIC IMPROVEtR4NTS POR THREE TRAFFIC SIGNALS LOCATED AT THS INTERSECTIONS OP HAVEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA STABET, BASS LINE ROAD AND AAMONA AVENUfi, AND BASfi LINE ROAO AND VALEtiCIA AVENVH, CONTRACT ND. 89-114 ANO AVTHORIZI2:G TY.E FIL II7G OF A WOTSCE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE D46. Approval to accent [he Vletoria Street Tmnrnvemnnt e. frrvn v.ot a..o....e .~ east of Etiwanda High Schoolr Contract No. 89-135, fls complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion". ASSOLUTION NO. 90-3 D7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP T'HE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA, ACCEPTING THfi PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POA VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM EAST AVENUE TO EAST OP ETIWANDA RICH SCHOOL, CONTRACT NO. 89-135 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D97. Approval to accept the Vineyard Avenue Street Improvement e, from 8th Street to north of the Atchleon, Topeka and Santa Fe Aailroed Crossing, contract No. 89-141, as complete, release the iwnde and authorize the City Engineer to £1 to a "Notice of Cx;pleticn". RESOLUTION NO. 90-308 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THS PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR VINEYARD AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM STM STREET TO NORTH Ctty Council MSnutee July 18, 1990 Page 12 OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 89-141 AND AUTHORI2INC THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D48. Approval to vacate a portion of Rinlock Avenue, located south of Highland Avenue, approximately 40 feet wide and 248 feet long and setting the date of public hearing for August 15, 1990. RESOLUTION NO. 90-309 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE RINLOCR AVENUE LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 40 FEET WIDE AND 248 FEET LONG - APN 1076-101-03 MOTION: MOVed by Browny seconded by Alexander to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unan imouely, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). f • f R E1. CONSIOBRATION OP AN OADZ NANCE ADDING CNAPTBR 9 19 ABATEMENT OF CERTAIN NUISANCES TO TITLE 9 - PUBLIC PBACB MO ara anD raau m, mwv n T+ OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Debra J. Adams, City Cle[k, read the title of Ordinance No. 422. ORDINANCE NO. 422 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.19 ABATEMENT OF CERTAIN NUISANCES TO TITLE 9 - PUBLIC PEACE, MORALS AND WELFRR°. TO THE CODE OF THE CITY OF AAHCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by euquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Ordinance No. 422. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (wright absent). • R ~ I h t P• ADVERTIBBD PVRLIC NEARI 8 Fl. roNSrnERATInN nF E~+Y IuON °NTP* ASST'° °°H'" °C DEVE•OPHEIiT REVIEW S9-i2 - AP VIES - An appeal of the Planning Commlenion'e decision denying the development of an i,nduetrtal complex containing six induetrlal bulldinge totaling 22,940 square feet on 2.2 acres of lend in the Cenarel InduetrLel Dietrlet, Subarea 3 of the Indust rinl Specific Plan, located on Feron aou levard, asst of Helm4 Avenue - APN 209-033-B7 and 88. (COatiauad from Juan 20, 1990) City Council Minutes ,IU ly 18, 1990 Pnge 13 Mayor Stout stated he understands the applicant ie requesting a continuance of this item until August 1, 1990. John Hannerino, representing the applicant, eiaied they have resolved the issues and ere having new plane prepared, which they will ba submitting to staff, and this should resolve the matter, but added they are requesting a continuance to the August 1, 1990 meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 90-238 A RESOLUTION OF YHE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI PORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COHMI SSION'S GENIAL OF DEVELOPlLSNT IIEVIEW NO. 89-12, TXE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL COMPLE% CONTAINING SIX INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 22,960 SOUAR6 FEET ON 2.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SVBAAEA 3 OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON FERON BOULEVARD, 6A3T OF HELMS AVENUE MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to continue the item to Augu ei 1, 1990. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent(. • • • • x F2. O ' - Recemmendniion fct the Council's Conaideret ion to set the rates for residential and commercial/ industrial rafuae collection within tae City of Rancho Cucamonga. aiaff report presented Dy Dinne O'Neal, Management Analyst II. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no reeponae, the public hearing was closed. Councilmembet Brown etaied that seventy-five cents per tan of this increase ie going to a newly appointed Waste Management Hoard in Sacramento. She added that she felt the fees will prctably continue Co rise. Mayor Stout felt the increase was warranted and stated the rafuae haulers eo a good job in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RBSOLUTION NO. 90-310 A RE SULVTION OP THE CETY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAr.SFOANIP., SETTING RP.TE3 FOR RESIDEHTIAI. A.9D COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTING WITHIN TH6 CITY OP NANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTIONr Moved by Euquet, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 90-310. Motion carried unanimously, 6-0-1 (Wright absent(. • • • • • e City Council Hinutee July 1B, 1990 Pe9e 14 F3. APPROVAL TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF S"AEET LTGH^'i NG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 POR TRACT NOS. 13565, -5 THRU -o LOCATED ON THE NORTH BIDE OP 24TH STREET EAST OF WARDMAN-BULLOCK ROAD Staff report presented by Joe St of a, Associate Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 90-311 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THB WORE IN CONNECTION WITH FORMATION OP BTREET LIGHT ZNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13565, - 5 THRU -9 MOTION: Hovetl by Alexander, eecondetl Dy euquet to approve Resolution No. 90- 311. Hot ion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). R • h R i O. PUBLIC HEARIN68 No Items Submitted. f R 1• 9 R E• CITY NANAOBR'S BTAPP RRRnOTG H1. CONSIDEAATS ON TO CONT'NUE PARTICIPATION IN SETTLENENT OF COURT PINE ISSUE TO 8E FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 01-4285-6028 Staff report prase nted by Jack Lam, City Manager. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Ale%ander to approve continued participation in the settlement of court fines up to an additional $10,000.00 from the General Overhead Account. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent) . R k R R A H2. DISCUSSION OF THE WOODS DEVELOPMENT HORSE TRAILS Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, who etetetl that during the past week staff has been working with the City Att.;rney's ot£i ce,. ... _~^_i cu lsr c.. ii~e Woodridge tract, and also the bonding company to look at those items that et ill remain outetand ing in the completian of public improvements, which would Lnclude cononunity treile. He stated they will echedu le the work with the bonding compeniee to complete the work where there are no bonds or agreements with Nordic in the Woodridge tract. He stated the other ones in Woods II have et ill not been accepted and era part of their completion for their public improvement e. He stated before occupancies are granted, they will be requiring the public improvement policies be Leken care of on the remaining houses. City Council Ninutee July 18, 1990 Page 15 James Marlunan, City Attorney, Stated Lhere has been no staff level extension on that tract ae mentioned, nor hoe staff brought any requeate for an axteneicn back to the Council for Notdic to do the work. He stated they have called the bonding company, and they aze scheduling a walk through with hie office to see what they will eo about tinishing this themeelvea. He added they aze not reconmending any extension to the Council. Councilmember Brown stated she had this put on the agenda at the reaueet of a resident. ACTION: Report received and fi10d } f R f f R I. COUNCIL BVSINE33 I1. CONSIDERATION TO AP INT JEANNB LOCHART TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OP DIRECTORS MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to appoint Jeanne Lochart to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board of Directors. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent ). f f} t R t I2. CONSIDERATION TO HATCH _ NO C O Y O NDATION •S $2 500.00 DONATION TO THE GARDINEA SPRING SOCIETY Staff repor[ presented by Buean Mickey, Management Anelyet I. Mayor Stout stated he hoe been appointed by the City to serve on the Gardiner Spring Society Board and would abstain from this vote. He added that Mr. Paprocki is requesting $10,000.p0 from the City. He stated he had advtsed Mr. Paprocki to request this from the Conuounity Foundation. He asked that the City match the $2,500.00 that the Foundation is donating and asked that if the Foundation would give en add it icnal $2,500.00, that the City match that amount also. Counc ilmamber Alexander stated he supported the total donation of 55,000.00. Councilmember Buquet stated he supported the Foundation adding an additional $2,500.00. Jack Lam. City Mananer, pt ated the City Cccnoil c-uid aporove the. i9;s00_nn en9 add another $7,500.00 contingent upon the Poundat ion approving the additional $2,500.00. Councilmambar Alexander eteted ha did not feel this needed to ba a contingency issue. Councilmember Brown felt the $2,500.00 wee enough to give from the City. City Council Minutes July 18, 1990 Page 16 MOTION: Roved by Euquet, seconded by Alexander to contribute $2,500.00 and add an additional 52,500.00 contingent upon the Foundation matching that amount. Motion carried ae follcwe: Ayes: Alexander, Buquet Noes: Brown AD sent: Wright Abstain: stout Motion carried 2-I-1-1. f R• 4 f 4 I3. CONSiDEF11TI0N OP INSTALLATION OF STREET NAME SIGNS RT THE TERMINUS OP CCU DE-SACS WHICH ARUT MAJOR STREETS (Continued frog June 6, 1990) Staff report presented by Paul Aouyeau, Traffic Engineer. Councilmember Alexander stated he agreed with the reconusendation and asked if 36 months was practical. Paul Aougeau stated 3 - 4 years would be more reaeoneble. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like to have a Council subcommittee to study this ieaue and come back to the Council with euggestione. Mayor Stout crated Chai a lot of the open cul-de-once hnve pedeetrlan access for a reason because the City wdnte people to walk Lnaiaad of using their care, and felt the siyne have an importance not only to vehicular traffin Hn• ni=~ ~. -earl= ,... a waixrng rn a cul-de-sec, and stated this was a concern of hie. He etatedV hie second concern Sa if there ie a cul-de-sac sign indicating the name of the street and there ie no street there, those eigne need to be unique in home respect with an arrow or something io indicate where it is. He also stated this be tried on new development to see how It works and then bring it back at budget time next year for the retrofit program. Councilmember Buquet concurred, and stated he would also like to set up some kind of trial period for these. ACTION: Subcommittee of Alexander and Buquet to study this ieaue and bring thle back at the August 15, 1990 meeting. r R 4 • • 4 ra nnuc rno ~~...... .. ---- C YNCIL'6 POLICIES REGARDING OE EL PMENT AGREEMENT TIME E%TBNSIONS AND OCCUPANCIBS OF 3TROCPURE6 NI THIN DEVELOPMENTS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Staff report presented by Shintu Boas, Deputy City Engineer. Mayor Stout asked Jamae Markman, City Attorney, how long it woultl take to put thle into nn ordinance. city Council xinutes July 18, 1990 Page 17 James Hackman, City Attorney, stated approximately September if the Council adopted the policy. H01'ION: Hoved by Buguet, seconded by Alexander to adopt the policy and have the City Attorney proceed to change all applicable Ortlinances and Reselutlone. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright aheent). . . R . . ~ J. IDHNTIFI GTION OF ITID18 POR NBIT MERTIMO J1. Counci lmember Buquet mated that the Alta Loma High School has a Viet Nam War Memorial and asked that the City get Lnvolved in the maintenance, construction see istance, or whatever, with this process. Mayor Stout et ated he agreed and asked that Jeck Lam prepare a pceit ion paper for this with options to cone ider. Counciimember Brown felt ihie should include the City ae a whole, not just Alta Loma, that all three conmunitiee should 6e incluAed. • x ~ . w . R COIIMUNIGTIONS FROM THH PUBLIC Kl. Mra. Nogg ins, Nordic tract, stated she became upset last weak by an untrue statement Sn the paper and felt she should have a public apology from the City Httorney. lames Markman, City Attorney, stated he was called by the prase on this matter. He stated the City has spent hours on this issue, including staff and City Council time. He continued to state that what went on at the sett lament conferences with Nordic was confidential, and he did not feel Mra. Huggins shoo ld have taken some of the comments made at the conferences to the press. He added he would not offer Mre. Huggins an apology. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there have been claims filed against the CLty because of the problems that have occurred and that ha has advised the City Council not to discuss this matter with anyone. He stated he feels the City's hands are tied for further meetings because of the claims filed. K2. Judith Marleau, 5344 Hermosa, who lives adjacent io the Nordic tract, stated when it rains the water cor^.es ds ~:. the strent end :lnnda her mpaay coons of ens assign of the Nordic tract. she asked if someone from the City could come out to her property to look at this. Councilmember euquet asked for Mr, Canez to follow through with this and give an update to the City Council with his findings. City Council Ninnies July 18, 1990 Page 18 x3. Brende Preecell from Paradise Developnent in Colton (Nordic home), stated she felt the City has worked a lot tc help the Rancho Cucamonga Nordic homeowners, sae stated she does not understand why the City of Colton dcee not try to help its resident e. She stated she hoe a sign on het home stating "Unhappy Momepwner^ and is being sued for this. Councilmember erown asked hnr io notify as many homeowners to attend the Tuesday, July 24, 1990 meeting where Senator Ayala will be attending. + . • ~ • « L. ADJOVRNNBNT MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-i (wrlght absent). The meet `_ng adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cebra J. Adams, CMC City clerk Approved: August 1, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COVNCIL MINUTES °°^^'ar Knntina A CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, August 1, 1990, in the Council Chambers located at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Centez Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p. m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembaze: Wil llam J. Alexander, Deborah H. Brown, Cherlee J. Buqust II, Pamela J. Wright, and N.ayor Dennls L. Strout. Also present werei Jaok Lam, City Manageri Andrew Arcayneki, Aeeietent City Attorney; Linda D. Daniel e, Deputy City Manager; Olen Jonas, Sr. RDR Analyat; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner; Vlnce Berton i, Aeeietent Pia^ner; Ruae Maguire, City Engineer; S.hi.-.tu Buee, Deputy Ciiy Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Monte Preacher, Public Works Enqineez; Jerry Grnnt, 8uilding Officifllt Ingrid Blair, GIs Supervisor; Susan Neely, Finance OPficerl Jamen v...°« _lSr Treasurer; Duane Raks. *ee,'.rtc.::. sue arty Manages: Diana O'Neal, Management Analyat Ii; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protect,ton Dietrlct; Lt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, Clty Clerk• f R R R R 4 B ANNOVNCBNBNTS/PRE36NTATIONS B1. Presentation of Proclamation Commending Lifesaving Efforts of Bruce Ann Hahn, Bill Jagger, and Dan Moralez. Mayor Stout presented the proclamations to Bruce Ann Hahn, Bill Jagger and Dan Moralez. 87. A presenter ic.-, weo made ro P..o_ Maquire, who had reoently resigned, for hie service to the City ae City Engineer. B3, A presentation Wae made t0 Linda Daniel8, Deputy City Maraget, fot her hard work on the Civic Center project. City Council Minutes Augu et 1, 1990 Page 2 84. ,Tack Lam, City Manager, stated a page was inadvertently left out of the agenda packet regarding isem I2r which has now been distributed to the City Council. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PVBLIC No communication was made from the public. k f R R f f D_ CONSENT CALBNOAA C1. Approval of Minutes: May 29, 1990 June 6, 1990 June 7, 1990 June 14, 1990 June 29r 1990 July 4, 1990 July 5, ]990 D2. Approval of Warranie, Register Noe. 6/29/90, 6/29/90, 7/13/90 and 7/19/90 and Payroll ending 7/5/90 and 7/19/90 for the total amount of $2,631,268.39. D3. Approval to award and execute a Profeeaional Services Agreement (CO 90- 125) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Norris-Repke, Incorporated, io prepare deafen plane, eoecif LCet lone and estimates far the Raven Avenue rehabilitation, widening and storm drain improvements frwo north of Foothill Boulevard to approximately 250 feet north of Church Street. The per diem not to exceed fee of $44,500.00 plus l0i coot ingenciee to be funded by Measure I, Account No. 32-4fi37-8801-4606-4110. O4. Approval to execute a Reimbursement Agreement (CO 90-126) far Undargrounding of Overhead Utillt fee for Development Review 87-2fi, located at the eeutheaet corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, eubmitted by Wat eon Land Company - URA 007. RESOLUTION NO. 90-312 A RHSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THfi CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBVRSEMENT AGREEMENT EXECVTDC OH ,.....~ 1C, 199C, EY Wf.TSCN LA.WD COHPANY, POA UNOERGROUND:NG•OP A PORTION OP THB OVBAHBAD VTILITIBS ON THB EAST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, BETWEEN ARROW ROVTB AND 8TH STREET, AND ARROW ROUTE BETWBEN ROCHESTER AVBNVE ANC I-15 FREEWAY D5. Approval. to execute an Agreement for Planning Servlcee (CO 90-127) in the amount of $3,902.00 monthly to be Eunded from Planning Division Account No. 01- 4333-1100 (PY 90/91). City Council Minutes August 1, 1990 Page 3 D6. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement (CO 90-128) between J.C.R. Oevelogment and Investment and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the J.C.R. parcel for the Nineteenth Street Project from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue. RSSOLUT ION NO. 90-313 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CTTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM J.C.R. DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT AND AUTHORIZING THS MAYOR AND CITY CLSRR TO SIGN SAME 07. Approval and execution of the Coet and Maintenance Agreement (CO 90-129) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Atchieor., Topeka and Santa Pe Railway Company (A.T. & S.F.) for the proposed widening of Maven Avenue at the A.T. S S.P. Railway Crossing designated ae PUC Cro eeing No. 2-96.7. AESOLUTICN NO. 90-314 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITI COUNCIL OF THfi CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING AND RXECVT ING THE COST AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWIEN TID2 CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA ANO SANTA FE RAILWI )Y CONPANY FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING OP HAVEN AVBNUB AT THE L.T. & S.F. RAILWAY CROSSING DE6IGNATED AS PVC CROSSING NO. 2-96.7 De. Approval of Map, partial termination of Agreement for PoeCponement of o ............. .. w.. ..-.~ ~ ._ .. _. .. .. .. Anrn rdaN nn of rrgo•a rn,..,~+,,., s . - _ -_ _ -_ _ _ - _.~__. _..._.._..e___..._.._r -...r-........-... ........~~.y and Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. I and 3 for Parcel Hap 12263 located on the southeast corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLVTION N0. 90-315 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNI A, APF ROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 12263 (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NO. 12263), IMPROVEMENT P.GREEMBNT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION 110. 90-336 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUG.FIGNGA. V'ALIFVRNIA. UNh RRINC TH_P. DNNPYDTIl14 IlP CEFTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL NAP 12263 D9. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement security for Milliken Perk 81te end Master Plen Stozm I~reln 5-1, located on the oast aide of Milliken Avenue and north of Tract 14368, uuWoitted by Lewis Development Company end the Y.M.C. A. Site. City Council Minutes August 1, 1990 Fags 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90-317 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCTL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRHBMBNT AND IHPROVRMBNT SECURITY POR MILLIRBN PARR SITE D10. Approval of improvement Security for Tzact No. 13851, located north of Wilson Avenue, Weet of Deer Creek Channel anA Release of the Inpm>,sa Security previously accepted for said Tract by City Council on January 3, 1990, submitted by Pacific International Developoent, Incorporated. RRSOLUTION NO. 90-318 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13851 ANO RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT SACUAITY PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. D11. Apprcval to execute Improvement Agreement Bxteneion Eor Parcel Hap 31891, located on the eoutheaet corner of Milliken Avenue and Arrow HSghwayr submitted by ACDC Aseociatee. RESOLUTION NO. 90-319 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREBMBNT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT eBCURITY POR PARCEL MAP 11991 D12. Approval to accept the Beryl Park and Ll.one Park Improvement Ptoject ae complete and authorization to file a notice of completion for the prof acts. RESOLUTION NO. 90-320 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN.ONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BERYL PARR AND LIONS PARR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHOFI Ei'3': THE FIL INr. OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOAX D13. Approval to accept Improvement e, Aeleaee of sonde and Notice of Completion for: fact 10349 located on the west aide of Saoohlce Street at ThorouahbYed rest Release: Faithful Performance Bond (9treet) $326,000.00 Acceptx Maintenance Ouarentee Bond (Street) $ 32,600.00 City Council NLnuteB Auguei 1, 1990 Page 5 ABSOLUTION NO. 90-321 A Afi30LUTI0N OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAHONOA, CALI POANIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEHENT3 FOR TRACT 10349 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOA TAE WORK Tr et 3715 to tad h n the et o n r of Jen a St~eoi and Rxeter Court Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 44,000.00 Pai^_hful Performance Bond (Street) $ 19,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4,400.00 Haintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 1,900.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-322 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0i7GA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13715 AND AUTHORIZING TN8 FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE NOAE CUP 85-19 located on the southwest corner of Pooth ill Boulevard and Ramona venue Release: Paithful Performance Bond (Street) $214,000.00 muw:,vrr Vn NO. 9C-323 A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CVP 85-19 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE 016. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond fcr Tracts 12590, 32590-2 and 12590-3 and -4 located on the northeast corner of Baee Line Aoad and Valenc La Avenue. Tract 12590 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 13,300.00 Tract 12590-2 F.aint~~aaCa Guarantee Bcnd (Sicnet) $ 2,550.00 Tract 12590-3 and -4 Neintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 1,800.00 City Cuuncil Minutes Auqu et 1, 1990 Page 6 D15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12952 Storm Drain located on the south aide of 19th Street between Maven Avenue and Deer Creek Channel. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 20, 900. p0 D16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Hond for Tract 13057 located on the south aide of Highland Avenue between Fairmont Way and Deer Creek. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4fi,000.00 D17. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 33060 located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue antl Pairmont Way. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 48,000.00 MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carYied unanimously, 5-0. R• R f M 1 N. CONSBNI' ORDINANCNS No Items Submitted. • R f r . . P ADYBRTI BED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. ONS D RAT ON O N T S T A O N V EW B9 DAMES - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying the development of an industrial complex containing elx intluatrial buildings totaling 22,940 square feet on 2.2 acres of land in the General Industrial District, Subarea 3 of the Industrial specific Plan, located on Feron sou lavard, east of Xelme Avenue - APN 209-031-87 and 88. (Castlnued froo July la, 1990) Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: John Mannertno, repreeentin9 MY. Davies, stated he was before the Council to adtlrees the issue of the undergrountl inq, and that all other Leauee had been resolved. Ha stated he did not feel there was a.; av raement twr wean ,. e City ann the dcvelcpar wn this taeue. He stated the piece of lend the City wants them to under9rountl ie on the eouti: aide of 8th 9tzeet and did not agree that it was actually adjacent to hie property. He added he did not feel the project could afford to pay tot the undergrounding fees. Councilmember Alexander asked if phase 1 was conditioned to be undergrounded when it was built. City Council Minutes August 1, 1990 Page 7 Ruse Maguire, City Hngineer, stated this information was in the memo distributed tonight. Mr. Garcia, another representative of the project, stated this ie not part of the conditions. Counc ilmember Alexander asked if when the other phases were drawn, were thes¢ conditions placed on them. Mz. Garcia stated the project was submitted as a single phase because he did not own the other property. Councilmember Alexander asked when the City was aware of Phases 2 and 3. Mr. Garcia stated June, 198;. Counc ilmember Alexandet eteted he felt there was conflicting information and asked for further clazif ication from Mr. Garcia, Mr. Garcia further clarified Councilmember Alexander's questions, and continued by et sting it would be a financial hardship on the project if they had to pay for the undergzounding. Ruse Maguire, City Hngineer, stated the conditions only state they would be required to pay one-half of th¢ in-lieu f¢¢a. H¢ added the railroad is willing to pay far one-half of the undergzounding. He stated the amount they would to required to pay ie approximately $9,000.00 for their portion of the in-lieu Fooo Mr. Garcia et ated Fie fiqurea were much different than Ruse Haguire'a 6y approximately $85,000.00. Mayor Stout suggested if a condition was added to the Resolution before th~r Council tonight stating the amount would not ¢xceed $4,062.50, wou13 that bn acceptable to them. John Mannerino, after consulting with Mr. Garcia, stated they would agree to that. There being no further response, the public hearing was cloned. RESOLUTIOry NO. 90-238 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF TBE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT ABVIEN NO. 89- 12, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX CONTAINING 9I% INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 22,940 SQUAA6 PHHT ON 2.2 ACRB9 OP LAND IN THH CHNBRAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 3 OP TNH INDUSTRIAL SPECIPIC PLAN, LOCATED oN PHRON B0UL8VAPD, EAST OP HELMS AVENUE City Council Minutes August 1, 1990 Page 8 MOT ICN: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve P.eeolution No. 90-238 ae amended by Mayor Stout. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. i R • • } f F2. CON ERA_ION OP ENV N ASS SSMENT ANO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 9 CI Y O C O ~ O GA - A request to amend the land use reeul at ions for Subarea 5 to conditionally permit Automotive Fleet Storage. Staff report presented ~y Vince Eertoni, Assistant Planner. Hayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Ademe, city Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 423. ORDINANCE NO. 423 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THfi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORNIAr AMENDING THE SNDUSTAZAL SPECIFIC PLAN TO AMEND THE LANO USE REGULATIONS POR SUBAREA 5 TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT AUTOMOTIVE PLfiET STORAGE MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown t0 set the second zeading of Ordinance No. 423 for August 15, 1990. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. R f f R f R O. PUBLIC BBARZN09 No Items Submitted. rt x 1 rt rt R 8. CITY MANAGER'S STAPP AEPOAT$ H1. DISCUSSION OF STAPF'S „~PYLICATION AN D IMPLEMENTATI ON OF VARIOllS CODES, ENGINEERING STANDARDS. PREV IOUS CITY COUNCI L ACTION. ETC. . REGARDING TRACT NOS. 10210. 12902. 13644. 12462. 11997. 13728. T BNTAT IVE TRACT NO. 13976 ANp PARCEL ~fAP X738. NORDIC DEVBI,OPM ENT AT VARIOUS LOp`ATIONS CIT Y-WIDE Staff Yaport presented by Ruea Maguire, City Engineer. Mayor Stuut asked if this report is concurrent with what the City Caunc it has been ualno for .nakiny t.`s it decis•~ne oa Chess matt9 r?- Ruse Magu ire, Clty Engineer, stated yes, and that staff would request an affirmation of this report. Andrew Arczynski, Resistant City Attorney, added he felt it was time for the City Council to do a re-affirmation of the policy. City Council Hlnutee August 1, 1990 Page 9 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, a¢conded by Brown to rsaf firm the currant policy and £or staff to continue alono these guldelinea. Met ion carri¢d unanimously, 5-0. • x • • • w I. COUNCIL BUBINBSS I1. REPORT ON VIETNAM WAR MEMORIAL Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Aeeiatant to the city Manager. Mayor Stout asked if this war memorial could possibly be annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 with the approval of Alta Loma High School. Andrew Arczyneki, Aeeiatant City Attorney, stated he could Look into this as far ae legal ramifications. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like to eee the City work with the alumni on this and would like the City to go on record for an amount to match funds. Councilmember Wright stated she would like to eee the City do something eubetantial. Jack Lam, City Hanager, stated staff can check into various options for the next meeting. Councilmember Baguet etntetl he was not sure it would 6e a good idea to dip info Landscape Maintenanee~ District No. 1 Funds for this. He added he would like to see the City match thu Poundatinn's dnnxH nn of <a.snn nn n..• ....,..ia r+se « _ _ a break down of costs for the program. Counc it member Wright did not feel the funds should come out of just one Landscape Maintenance Dietrtet, but for all of the City residents to take a part in paying for the coe~; of the maintenance. Counc Llmember Alexancet stated he would like for the Council to approve something tonight inetnad of spending staff time to do Further reeearch on this. eouncilmember Wright agreed, any stated the school District will maintain it. Councilmember Buquet later in I:ne meeting asked that it be included with this item that th¢ High Sch,>ol not have to pay a $25.00 permit fee Eor the work on the mcnument. MOTION: Moved by Buqu.xt, seconded by Stout to contribute $4,000.00 from the Reserve Account. Mot lot cacr ied unanimously, 5-0. Mayor Stout eeked for staff to check with the school District to eee !£ they need help with the meant enance of this. City Council Minutes August 1, 1990 Page 10 Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated he would do this. + • • x r k Z2. DISCUSSION OF BU5 STOPS ON MAVEN AVEN~ Staf{ report presented by Rues Hagu ire, City Engineer. Councilmember Buquet stated hie concern ie for the people waitinn far the b..a to .*.=_ve ..., stead in the Tloo6 control zones while they are waiting. He suggeeted`eome sort of a possible safety shelter for the people to Wait in. Councilmember Wright felt the City shoo ld suggest to Omnitrane that some of their bus stops are unsafe fot the people waiting at the bus stops. She did not feel it was up to the Clty to do something to make it safe, but that the City should contact annitrane regarding this safety problem. Councilmember Brown stated she had 'Drought this problem up at an Omnitrane Board meeting, and also added she Felt something should be done particularly at the bus atop on Haven between Base Line and Church. Mayor Stout suggested that possibly the bus route could be changed where that particular et retch of Haven where the bus travels could be diverted over to Hermosa with the unsafe boa stop moved. Councilmember Buquet felt this was a prcblam net aniy pert sluing to Omnitrane, but also to the City. Councilmember Brown felt staff shoo ld work with Rnh rheas,., ~- _..c rwa :.iiicy c. ~.,.~~i ~wciny rnie atop and working out a solution to this unsafe situation. She suggested Diane O'Nea'_ work with Nr. Chaffin on this issue. Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II, stated she could have information back to the Council at the next meeting on this issue. ACTION: Additional information to come hack at the August 15, 1990 meeting + . x - . Z3. UPPATE ON THE SOLID WASTE ADVS$QRY TASK FORCE FORlIED TO ASSIST IN COORDINATING THE DEVEf NT OP I U C AEDU N ECYCLING ELEMENTS PURSUANT TO STATE MANDATED LEGISLATION 39 (Oral Report Dp Dalsgatej Councilmember Brown at ated that the TaaY. Force hoe enterr alned that Weal E+id cities 1,...- - ownsuicinq proposals that would in affect save money if all the cities went in together. She stated the proposals they are loo;aing at, the Baal Valley just accepted one which ie $225,000.00, and not to ex :eed $300,000.00 which was for the east end. She etnted they last met on .IUly 30 and that they have the RPP'e ±n and ate now in the process of reviewing the consultant proposals, and will meet again August 10 to figure out who they will interview and then rank them. She stated the interviews will be the week of August 13, and the goal Se to floe ll ze the professional services agreement, if the City City Council Minutes August 1, 1990 Page it desires, by the end of Auguei and brought back to the We et End City Councils by the first meeting in September. She stated the next meeting will be to disease the pro rata share, whether by population, square tonnage, or square miles. She stated it looks ea ifr even though the County will not tell everyone how much, it was figured they are charging an extra $1.00 per ton for the AS 939 mandate. She felt it looked ae Lf they would be able to give some seed money to the east, we et and mountain/ desert areas to help everyone with putting out some of the front money far the coneultante. She stated aha also site on the Fu611c Edccatia Ccm :ittee rotative to tote and they have met four times with them. ACTION: Report received and filed • x • • a . I4. DISCVSS IOU OF WA VING PERM T PEES A NORDIC NOMEO ERS WHOSE RES D CES WE E FOVND TO VE ^ COO O 0 S AND U T B FIXED PER CITY REGVLATIONS (Oral Report by NorAic Subeoaitteej Councilmember Brown stated it had been brought to her attention by the newspaper that the Nuggine' ha4 paid fees and felt the City Council had already approved to waive foes for at lee et the three homeowners thnt had structural damage ccnfirmed 6y Mr. Sullivan. She stated she had been informed by staff no formal vote had been taken, and that to why it was put on the agenda. Mayor Stout asked Mr. Arezyneki if the Council needed any type of dleclaimer with respect to admission since there ie lit tgation pending. Andrew A[ezyneki, Aeeletent City Attorney, at at ad this is noL an adm5oat ~~ ~~ uy L, uy. Counc ilmember 3uquet asked that previously paid fees be refunded. Andrew Arczyneki, Assistant City Attorney, stated he did not see a problem with refunding the permit fee. NOTION: Moved by Baguet, seconded by Brown to exempt fees and also retroactively refund fees for the One particular permit that was previously paid £or. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Addressing the City Council was: Ann Guider a, Woods II resident, stated they had been required tc obtain permits on the septic tank ayeteme and asked if they ware oleo inuiuded -.. ....a .aind+uraement. .lack Lam, CLty Hanager, stated if that ie the Council's wLeh they should add this to their motion. Councilmember Buquat stated Mra. Guiders had been asked to pull a permit becauea of the defective eept is system to aeelet the Clty with its effort e. City Council Mirutee August lr 1990 Page 12 Mayor Stavt stated the concept would be to refund permit feee which were charged on the defective workmanship items at Nordic. Jerry Grant, Building official, stated the Guiderae pulled a permit for exploration of the septic system to det¢rmine if there was a problem with it; which there turned out to De a problem. Andrew Arozyneki, Assistant City Attorney, stated that by gluing a blanket approval of this could be opening up a lot of problems and that it should De checked out ae far ae these people receiving refunds Erom insurance compeniee, a contractor or someone else. Ne felt there matters should be addressed on a case-by-case basis with a breeder policy implication. Councilmember Baguet felt it should be those items that in the opinion of the Building official fella within the ^bad builder" concept or problem with these specific tracts, Lhat he didn•t want this to be a blanket waiver of fees. He stated a person could came to the Connell, and make their request, and a dec ieion could be made at that time. • • x x J. IDEtPfIPICATIOM OP ITRIB POR YBTT YBRTIMn No items were identified for the nsxt meeting. . • . + ~ . R. Co10U1NICATIONe PROM TH6 PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. • • x e MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to ndj ourn to 8xecut ive Seesion to discuss personnel matters, and for Executive Seeeion to adjourn T.O the August 9, 1990 Horke hop to die cu ee Multi-Femily Development. Motion Carr led unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p. m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: August 22, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCRMONGP. CITY COUNCIL MINOTAS Joint Meetinc Clty Council antl the Envizonmentnl Management Cwasieeion A. CALL TO ORDER A joint meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Environmental Management Comil6eion waa scheduled fot Wednesday, August 22, 1990 at 7:00 p. m. in the Haven Avenue Conference Aopo, 10500 Civic Centel, Aancha Cucamonga, CalifornLe. Present were: Mayor Dennis L. Stout end Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. Due to lack of quorum, the meeting was adjourned. Aespecifully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved by City Council: Approved by Environmental Management Conmiesion: PAGE City Council Agenda September 5, 1490 ~ 1 All items aubritted for the Citp Council Agenda runt be in writing. The deadline for subritting these item is 5:00 p.r. ov the Wednesday prior to the resting. The Citp Clerk's Office receiva• all such item. A. CALL TO ORDHR i. Roll Cell: Huquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Brown _, and Wright , ~ I 1 i i R. ANNOUNCEItEN'fS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation o£ Proclamacion Recogviz:.ng Thomas Marich ae "National Corrections Supervisor of the Year". C. COMMVNICATION8 FROM TH6 PUBLIC This is the tits sad place for the gaaaral public to address tba Citp council. state law prnhibit^ !ha City Council frw addrusing sap twos sot praviausly Secluded op tea Agaada. Tae Citp Council map rieaiw tastirony and Nt the raltar for a subsequent meeting. Cawote •rv to ba 1Litad to five minutea par individual. D. CONSRNT CALmlDAA Tae following Consent Calendar itus are aspsctad to be routive and eon-contreoaraiel. They will be ectsd upon by the Comcil at one tine witaout discuu ion. Asp Star rap ba reroved by a Councilaember or rerbar of the audience for disco uioa. 1. Approval of Minute e: July 18, 1990 (Wright absent) August 1, 1990 Au goat 22, 3990 2. Approval of Warrente, Register Noe. 8/8/90, 8/15/90, and H/22/90 and Payroll ending H/16/90 fOr the total amount of 56, 199,254.C4. 3. Approval of the advertising of the "Notice Inviting 15 Blde^ fox the Landscape and Irzigat ion Maintenance Contract for Landscape Malnienence Assessment Districts Numbers 1 and 5, to be fundetl by Account Numbers 40- 4130-6027, 40-4130-6028 entl 44-4130-6029, 44-4130-60i:R respectively. ~. a city coancil Agenaa F~a } ~ September 5, 1990 e~eP O° a`O~3 PAGF. 2 I ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 90-337 I I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING I i 'I THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ~I' II II "LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCfi I 'i CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MALNTENANCfi I ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NUMBERS 1 AND 5^, SN II SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE I I I CITY CLERE TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS I II 4. Approval of the advertising of the ^Notice Inviting ~ 21 I "', Bide" for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance ~ ~ Contract far General Pund and Landscape Maintenance I ~' ~ Aeseesment Districts 3a and 3b, to be funded by account numbers 01-4647-6028, 42-4130-6027, 42-4130-6028 and 46- I I ' 4130-6027, 46-4130-6028 respectively. RESOLUTION NO. 90-338 22 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY I OP RANCRD CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOA Tf[E "LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE ' i ~ ~ CONTRACT FOR GENBRAL FUMO AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENAtiCfi ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 3A AND 38", IN SAID CITY AND AVTNORIZING AND DLRECTLNG I 5. Approval of the advertising of the "Notice Inviting 26 i Bide" for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance . ~ Contract for the Lantlecape Maintenance Aeseeement I Districts Numbers 2 and 4, to ba funded by Account Numbers 41-4130-6027, 41-4130-6028 and 43-4130-6027, I 43-d 130-6028 respectively. RESOLUTION NO. 90-339 27 A AESOLUT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPBCIFICATIONB FOR THE II i "LANDSCAPH AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE I MNTA A(`T FnP ANDarApv_ uniHmnHnyrv ASSESSMENT DIBTRICT9 NUMBERS 2 AND 4," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AN- DIRECTING THE I CITY CLERI( TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 6. Approval to reject ell bids for the Baee Line Median, 31 ~ 1 Phase I, located Pram Maven Avenue to Valenoia Street. I rocs City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 3 7. Approval of the eetabliehment of Park and Recreation commie eion Ad Hoc Advisory Comnitteee. e. Approval to destroy records which are no longer required ae provided under G..~arnment Code Section 34090. AESOLVTI ON NO. 90-340 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCKO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORSZING THE DfiSTAUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 9. Approval of Parcel Hap 11286, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Parcel Hap 112 e6, located on the east side o£ Milliken Avenue 600 feat north of Church Streetr eubmittetl by Lewis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 90-341 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OF RM1NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 112 E6 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 112&6) ABSOLUTION NO. 90-342 R RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL HAP 11286 10. Approval of Parcel Map 32596 and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 nntl 6 fot Parcel Hap 12596, located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue end Foothill Boulevard, submitted by OAS Investors. RESOLUTION NO. 90-343 A RESOLUTION OP TNR CITY COUNCIL OP TNS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NUMBER 12596 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 12596) 32 34 35 38 39 40 43 44 PAGE City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90-344 A RESOLUTION OP SHE CITY COUNCII~OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNB%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPfi HAINTSNANCE OI STRICT NO. 3 ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12596 11. Approval of Parcel Map 12781, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 12781, located at the eouthweet cornet of Jersey Houlevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Stanton Jersey Partners. RESOLVTICN NO. 90-345 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO WCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NO. 12781, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 12781) RESOLUTION NO. 90-346 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING LANDSCAPSV,MAINTENANCB •D ISTR ICT NO -•9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12751 12. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 90-135) for the preparation of traffic signal coordinat icn timing plane for Foothill Boulevard tc Herman Eimmel and Aeeociaiee in the amount of $14,905.00 ;$13,550.00 plae 108 coot ingancy) to be funded from Redevelopment Agency, Account No. 16-503000. 13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 end Street Lighting MAInT PnA nf,`P Dt?t ri rf Nno. l and S for n1JP 00-.1L~ t_ _-_A at the eouthweet corner of 8aee Line Road end Xellman Avenue submitted by Parkpiece Cucamonga. 45 48 49 50 53 55 V PAGE City Council Agenda September 5, 1957 5 RESOLUTION NC. 90-347 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMFP.OVEMEAT AGAEEHENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY PUR CONDITIONAL PERMIT USE NO. BS- 46 FESOLUTION N0. 90-348 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCAr CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 POR CUP EE-46 14. Apnroval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement security and Ordering Lhe Mnexatlon to Lnndecape Maintenance Diettict No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nce. 1 and 6 for DR 57-56, located on the eouthwwet corner of Jezeey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted by sianton Jersey Partners, a California Limited Pnrtnerehip. ABSOLUTION NO. 90-349 ^.~ vL„~~.,, ~. eV3Y VL LnL 1.1It OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA,ICALIPOANIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGPI:EMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87-56 56 57 60 61 RESOLUTION MO. 90-350 62 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OMERING THE ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSOAPB MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N09. 1 AND 6 POR DR E7-56 15. Approval Lo release sewer and Water Bonds for Tract I, 65 1x55$ 1___ad on the ,^.art..eva~ wrra. o. ounnul Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Roed.` Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Sewer) $333,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Hater) $491,500.00 PAGE City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 6 16. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and 66 Notice of Completion for Tract 13650 located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Street. Release: Faithful Performanee Bond 5219,079.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 5 21, 9G7.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-351 67 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY i OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IHPAOVEHENTS FOA TRACT 1366D AND AUTHORIZING THB PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE NORR 6. CONSQIT 0RDIN11NCRs The following Ordinance have had public hgringe at the Line of first reading. Seco¢d rgdi¢ge are •:pected to be routine and non-w¢trovereial. Thep pill W acted upo¢ by tha Council nt oas tine without dienuwieq. The Ciip Clerk will rqd the tills. Rap itq eaa W rgated for diacuteio¢. m..c.~e...~..... .... ... ...... _.....~ ___.___ ua i I AND OCCUPANCY OP POPTED CITY PROPERTY ORDINANCE NO. 425 (second read Lng) 68 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TXE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING FUEL IC fiNTRY AND OCCUPANCY OP POSTED CITY PROPERTY The following itge have bean edvsrtited sad/or poabd •e public hgringe as required by law. Tha chair will open the weetinc to rwcwiew p.,n ii,. teet+~-aY~ City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 PAGE 1. CONSIDBAATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND BTIWANOA 69 SPECIPIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan pertaining to the proposed removal of existing Eucalyptus windrows ~ 1 ae n rsault of the alignment of Summit Avenue west of I Etiwanda Avenue and other street alignments. (Continued from August I5, 1990) ' ORDINANCE NO. 424 (first reading) 83 ' I ~ ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY I I II ~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ' i ' ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01, ~ ~' AMENDING PIGURE 5-13 OP THE ETIWANDA i i SPECIFIC PLAN AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT ~ THEREOF 86 2, rnwcrngnnmrow nP EXPRESS PINDINGS OF FACT FOR RRFTTENTT nt. Ln!roMAT TC FIRB SPRI NXLERS BECAUSE OP LOCAL CONDITIONS - A resolution, when edopted~ which will ~ I i ~ comply with the provision of the State of California I Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7. V RBSOLVT ION NO. 90-352 87 A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY ODUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA~ CALIPORNIA~ HARING I MOD IPICATIONS •TO TNB CITY'S BVILDING CODB? ' AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 426 ARE I ~ i ~ ABASONABLY NBCESSARY BECAUSE OP LOCAL '~ CL IMATIC~ GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL I CONDITIONS M ERATI ON OF AN OAD INANCE REOUTAING AUTOMATIC FIRS 91 SPRINXL8R5 IN ALL RBSI DENTIAL BUILDINGS AND CERTAIN i i i i AELATBD ACCE330RY BUILDINGS I City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 PACE ~ i ~' li i it i i Ili I ~ i I I ' i ORDINANCE NO. 426 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFSAENCE STANDARDS NFPA 13D AND NPPA ~ 13R, BOTH PVBLISHED HY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATIOA, REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES AND CERTAIN BUILDINGS ACCESSORY THERETO, WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTION TO SAID CODES 3. s v o NT 93 9 I I I TR CT 14192 - HI% DEVELOPMENT - Appeal of the Planning ' Conmiaeion's dacUion to require the undergrounding of utilit iee and the coneiruction of street and storm drainage improvements beyond the project boundaries for a residential subdivision of 65 single-family lore on 19.7 acres of lnnd located south of 19th Street between ~ Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street in the Low i ' . Reeidentlal District - APN 202-061-12, 14, 40 and 44. i RSSOLUT ION NO. 90-353 ZEN '. OP AANCNO COCAMONGA, CALI FOANIA, DENYING A I REQUEST TO DELETE POUR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 FOR A I ~ RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OP 65 SINGLE FAMSLY I i ~ ~ LOTS ON 19.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOVTH OF ' ~ j I 19TH STREET BETWEEN NELLKAN AVSNVE AND i ~ ANSTHYST STREET IN THE LOW RESIUENTIAL ~ ^I STRICT At:D MARINO FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THSAEOP I 4. CONSIDE aTION OP TIME S%TENSION POR DESIGN ASVIEW 88-03 213 i - A.E. SMITH - An appall of the Planning Commission's ~ daciaion to add the standnrd school mitigation condition to the development of 20 apartment unite on 1.0E scree i i i ~i lanri in Ihn Medl~~m-pl gh Peal danY lal plwr riot (ib-28 ~ t i dwelling unite per acre), locaiad et the end of Sierra Madre Avenue, west of Edwin Street - APN 207-251-22. ~~. PAGE City Council Agenda ~~ ;` F September 5, 1990 9 y ` e S 8 3 e V o R RESOLUTION NO. 90-354 239 ~ ~ A RBSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~ OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN i REVIEW SS-03, ANC OERYING THE APPEAL THBAEOF, TFffi DEVELOPMENT OF 20 APARTMENT KNITS ON 1.08 ACRBS OP LAND IN THIS MBDIVM- ~~ HIGH AEBIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE END OF SIERRA NADRE AVENUE, WEST OF EDWIN STREET I AND HARING PIND2NG5 IN SUPPORT TFR'REOF i ~ 5. CO SICEAATI OF O 9 T ~ 243 ~ SPECIFIC 89 3 O 0 CVCAHON A ~ I ~ - A request to amend the circulation element of the ' ~I Indueirial specific Plan (SODerea 5) for the deletion of Seventh 9ireet DeLween Hermosa Avenue end Centez Street - APN 209-261-09 and 30. ORDINANCE NO. 427 (first reading) i 261 i, i AN ORD INANCfi OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ~ ~ OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING I SNDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMEIIDMENT 89-03, AMENDING PZGURB II-3 AND PICURB IV-7, AND i I i MARINO FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF O. PUBLIC MEARINOS ~ Tae following iteu Date no legal publication or posting requireaenL. Ths Chair will opera the wstlag to racdPe ~ ~ i public tastiwnp. 1. CONSIDERATION OP AN ORDINANCB AE-INSTATING PROVISIONS 266 LEGISLATURB ~ I ORDINANCB NO. 428 (£iret reading) 266 AN ORDINANCE OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ~ V I OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING NEW I I I CF(~'1'Tl1pC ') l2 (1l (~ 1MV ~! 17 /1A 11 T_n nV~Om00 I 2.12 OP TITLB 2 OP THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, TNERBBY REQUIRING POSTING 1 OF AGENDAS AND PROVID2NG OPPORTUNITIES POR THS PIIBL IC TO ADDRESS TNB CITY COUNCIL PAGE City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 10 H CSTY NANAOER'S STAFF REPORTS The followiag itua do not lagallp require any public teatisonp, alibough the Cbair uy opeu the aeeting for public ieput. 1. REOUFST FAON HA AND MRS EAT2 POR FINAL INSPECT'ON AND RELEASE OF OTZLZTI£S ON,LOT_~4~_ TRACT 13666 2. CONSIDERATION OP ADOPTION OF WATER CONSERVATION RESOLUTION RESOLUTION N0. 90-355 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING ADOPTION OF CONSERVATION MEASURES TO MITIGATE THE EFPECTB OF THE 1990 CALIFORNIA DROUGHT 3. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE d, CON TTON OF L NOMAAK DESIGNATION 90-D2 - THE RED CHIEF MOTEL ANO CA_S L ATED AT R270 FOOTHILL Sol A_FD - A proposal to consider a:i application to deny a Landmark Deeignntion for the Retl Chief Motel and Cafe. Hieioric Preservation Commission oleo caqueste policy direction renw rdinn a....~a..~+.i+ -_ .___- -_~-.. .... the Hear Gulch area which would -include-ihe Sycamore Inn, the significant trees, the 06o Bear statue and potential archaeological resources (the site of the proposed Sycamore Village project) but exclude the Red Chief Hotel and Cafe - APN 207-101-17. .,. STATUS OP RECYCLING CENTERS IN SMO_PPING CENTER': 6. CONSIDERATION OF CPVNTY REFERRAL BH-OS - UNIVERSITY CgEST - Master Tentative Ttacter Final Development Plan Map, and Various Tentative Tract Mape for 1,293 stogie family reeidentinl unite, 6.3 acres of coamercial, 4.56 acre park site, and 7.17 acre school Bite for University Crest Planned Development PrOpoeal on 625.16 scree of land lxated .--rth of Higniand AvanV?; s..ueh s .ytili~y corridor, eaetVOf Day Creek Channel, with portions we et of Hanley Avenue and porticos west of Etiwanda Avenue within the City's Sphere of Influence. The proposal also includes the dedication as permanent open space of 675 scree located within the National Forest. 7. STATUS REPORT ON CENSUS RESLR TS 269 271 272 273 290 341 345 398 PAGE City Council Agenda 5eptamber 5, 1990 11 B. ~AAUE HEPARATION AT POOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SOUTHERN 399 PACIFIC RAILROAD COUNCIL DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH FORHAL DESIGN FOR GRADE SEPARATION I. COUNCIL BUSINESS i The following iteee Ileac been requestad by the CiLp Council for discussion. Thap ars not public hearing itga, although the Chair wp open the eaeLing for public iap~;t. 1. DISCUSSION OF BUS STOPS ON HAVEN AVENVE (Continued froe I 405 August 19, 1990) 2. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRIBUTING SS 000 00 TO THE INLAND 411 EMPIRB DESIGN INSTITUTE ~ 3. DI ION OF E AIN INTO A CONT CT WITH MC LISTER 413 DHS IGN TO DEVELOP A GRAPHICS PACIUGE POR RANCHO ~ CUCANONGA POLICE VEHICLES 4. pISCUSSION OF ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT WITH MCALLISTER I 415 DESIGN TO DBVEL4P A GAAPHIC9 PACAAGE POR A SSA1 FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5. CONSID&RAT ION OP A POLICY EYTENDINC SALARY AND BENEFITS 4~) ~ HMPLOYBES WHO AA8 CALLED INT2ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE _ _ _____ _ _ _ 'T U 6. REPORT BY MAYOR 9T0UT1 DZSCVSSION OF CONDVCTING COMMUNITY AWARENESS SEMINARS i 4)8 REGARDING GANGS AND DAU65 7. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING POLICY REGARDING USE OF CITY 419 COU 00 N CONFERHNCE ROOM 8. pISCUSSION OF DATE5 AND ATTENDANCE OF SPECIAL COUNCIL O 9. DISCUSSION OF SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION (COatinue to October 3, 1990) O N6 This L the Lice for Citp Council to identify the ilea they wish to dlaavu at tha next eating. Thee itga will not be discrued et LAL aeiinq, only identified for the next act ing. ry~ PAGE City Council Agenda September 5, 1990 12 ' F. COMMUNICATIONS IRON TNB POBLIC Thi• is the tiu and pLee for the general public !o addeeaa the Citp Council. stela law prohibits the Citp Comeil froe addrasslag nap issue not previously 1ncludW oa the Agssda. I The Citp Council up receive taatiea~ap and net the utter for a avbaaquea! aetinq. Cowata are to be liaited to five I ~ i ~ minutes per iadividnsl. I ~ ~ ~i L. ADJOURNIBNT IBRTINO TO ADJOORN TO EZECUTIpE 8683ION TO DISCUSS PNRSONRRL I MATTSRN. I, Debra J. Adana, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify ihai a true, accurate copy of the foregoing egenda wan posted on August 31, 1990, seventy-twa (72) hours I ~ prior to the meeting per Government Code 56953 at 10500 Civic III I I I Center Drive. ~~n _ : Y WW Y NN WWNNwYPW4NNWwWY N Y~~O f PP V N M P N tle O tle~P ~.p NNNOV•fWPtlN.OfVP Nf W f NW u• N N P N PeYY)))r.)sY. n n rr r )eNNaalairrr~~~~~ali )e° ~r°.iN ii ~ n )r cc e axN:NYmmm~9rvnnps<yra m-IAn ~ am n ~ m nn w mY^s)2aaA)SN)O SYMT r~l Z m •ON-~ sG2ir9NS 0_yi 1_UmZ J ) 1 )_ ) T x ww V OnnnTP9YiIyNn a A m C A __)Nm• ~ m mU O U nn n m9Py90~ ay ~Y 4T o _ _ iZ9vP )n+ >Mm y • • Z r • N CC mO YnNnNtP) OmmF N C nC TYrN A P nff m m Y n V w O 9Y S 2 S SZY NS m m T Z 9 • DO r NS 7_2 m2 '4 -f N a0~ ~Y V iZi x i21 N pn N N V n 2 Nio N c T vc n ~ V ZY n• nG r mC Op SZ mi ii-imw wiAmn im r N simcciY zcc_c_c_c_c_ernv ao° °r ma ~ o oa v V CMya \-~ 29 O )YC.O VnnmrY~n vcvevvazav An°o mr r nn t!m TON SYS OU y m as T ~nsv nn °ziANiNnvnNns a osmv A zy e ~ P a2fmiw3•mt9llTil~ nniil ~9TT O Z i or iNVZ~NNS2•~92NaNiNYn i O C OS A O Y m1NNVy0 9T n-1 AOa TSUnrNPNrN SV U 1 00 U mZCV~OUNTYmONOT\w-lie 1' SST CNONONV •O r0 T ni 11 2 ) NN -1f NN T P U \~ \ NNN-ITOYtltlOOm p_rAN00 NSa O_nA A I~ n ! N AAOmO-IN ) NY ~=N Yi i T N N N \w \ •Ila F> Py O 9 O tlN ASr V-1tltl _ ON ml _f r OG O T!1 Ntl~~i YT nOP Tn n ` O WZTrO Thin P~nUA3A A Pri N TONr\r )N 23 II •N~ ASn •A nVn II tlTNTNr •C II /1\e/1 n n • n n n n WOm 00 S9 NZ\n\ On m0 UI )O YN • \i \ • ^3 Aes T Om T C ~T• •01 •O~ •A• •i1 1i• s Y ) zN 00\M yJY\N\N O tl f rv • IJ PN ? M rnp Oerwi d r m H S P _ __ • Y •• •9 1 1 1 1 11•IYI 1 1.1 I n ~t~ Pf lffff wffff lwPff wfwPlf•fffwf Pf fffll•Pfffwlwff0 VVVVVVUVVMV~VVVVVVVVVV.1PPPPPPPP pPpNNNNff lffP• e00oeoe00000e0ep00 V Oe N tltl•f RYER.4RY4W4WwWw,.wWN»rvNNrvNN~~,o°.:Y'a>PP'P"vN'd'Ww•4LLA .z: WvNW~PN•WVYetl p.lPNwWN~erwNwwNPSNw P•NPNetlrPetl•Nr •e. •s•• • wwwi°wNi w w ww •Y v v v v ° :~ V V V V V V V V V V V V •O ~H NT •Y f ~AI\ AA ~- • P P M PVYw • P V O N • 11\ r yieNWOWNOrOPN P IIf I1N O POPOOOOOOWOPO w0 P •~~o 00•Wf0000pOfO00000uwNe ~p00 O .O » v V N P 1 1 11 I ~ ~ /9 /Y ~ IIT ~ IIT T a N T 001 OTS n ~CZ O.O Ir OYC IYI tlONi nW110r nNWnnn PNMNNNNNNMUWNYNU10mVNOmOOmPpINNP1VP1P11P1110Z.1I~V 10M nPVONNOPVWVOWnnMVIPOODUNNUN I.4P NOOPOMOUPPNIVnVNIUOVN eerT.i ~aioi«««~m°Om°mi:i°cc`~c cccn"`~oao.nm ni°c co szv~«moP~PPD iaAwezmcN<nPP n Poni~nnnnoc°z:zr y~zy zNA CZ mcrJNi nNn:e YVG1z\OAZ EiinlaFYli1~}yi 1T-1TTen V• OSTNNmT2y Ti rTTm Az OfmOPN m_O ry rm JO__O p_O__OOf VrreSAP w~mViZT wyV} Yj ~~ Ti °n~ ZSO~ Lz1Y ri CNSr ~ nfGPAN~ ~m~ y OC2• mi P Pii~ YnOPN V :n _ yinNT~nOPp~Pp Ty}Ny. ni}Z1msmZyVi Y _° T nu~ro~~A NET r~° mZ000nOO T__E TH TNNyEZf T°MAV2N mN1w m ~ am. T N~.Ae~ATZn e=N.J.T. \i P~"nw r~ci»~l2.PSm ~ zJZ ne° y'1 Zm' NFmSfzlmP 1yVyyyum+ NP • mm Z T 1 aAOAA it fp C • y n Ono °000 c ~ NL ~ m Po o m Pc .. (~ z x °c rr z~ i<JyJ. r :i i N z `w i n n N z o m i m x s <COAL AAUZOnANVIVVNpnwwnAi AVOVOAn:mAA:AnA NcAPm AFPT\nmmn...~m...moooAS:irmPs~m..M °<mN mm mmm ..noAT ~ TT TOWUr OO1«NNPTw TzTaTTmYY TwT2e 33 NC of G°NC~OiY.fcll y.IN C_2TCCm C__ c• GczGVG nOCmaOP mVm V°2°000l llln< mTrO\ 12TH A2iJ2;z nmT mua mJOprmw NeoeAOPNC No «ossa <m°m°PA yimw :a .-1~°odzen~r s~ sr riP n m w AecO C. l2nriN2NpnPN eN TIO ON n:SNmCni2TO9eN~NZ`J °oZjNti;Tin=yminlYn l Ni 12Amn0)Mn TI NZNiPm2m uO2A Y mOO2NN AOiNZTU<J Z2 Tmt -.rN Z OA <PY'/nN im yNTJV < Nn mnATn C fOn 1N rYPO NAnP OmNmO fN mnPr2i• PO yi• Nfi<mTAJA\PT°}~ APP\ rNAx PAZZ SNOVN iAPnONes ti rON N OnNOnNNOV Tmmmnu N PFmiIn ONVO\1 °oc~mN Da AP cy~ N Ne-IPm\I~rem sNe co°PZTi n« n« N .. n A •f9}Nry m11~A NM~mA.•° NNA\) Nn naf.ANer :zrmN •NN N 2 mnw;~NOA\ V nONNS+ m.°o snN ~~^• r nVNZNN OONa \W NOm_N Pfu <WYFmN P MPO n }T O <mV Nr O ,1 O N\NyVn I NI NArN 1 ~ z c JI i ~ °me me aW 2 1 1 Pnnz P• r_ P \ WZZN \ ~1 x c n n°e e N ; gee+ r z N Te .. . . . . . <.a..• A .. . c •P<141 IVVY~VVJJVVVVVJVVVVVVJVVVJJVVVVVVVVVVYVVVVVV<< .V-~+veeooC CmOe C y <PNtl$NNOmOSeEEEsspJYEvEJM~1MYPpPEEPEEPPYSNV°i .°n u°i u°iNA NnOOey •WMnONOVDNPUNY00DVpM1uNnONOVPNIWNn000VPN<WNr N~ VJIM N V PVn nP VNMrnO M V DNNININVNUNNP10PfnoN ryVii °OOP OfNOOWNnOMrWODUOWPp ~.OONNOOOMOOOOVOpONPNOr}nOOPOOVOONO~OUV !+VO On .~ ?y^OSNOOCDCGPON~T V'nnsNnpOlOpVOOVO01oNeemnu°r10.~0 :<: :_: .°~ ~°. •}. • ~ izi .r. •~Y 9 :mi iz: •°~ Yn TA • V ~ ~_• IPii is~ ~i~ •O~ ill ~)~ SYa 1I I ~ ~ I Y • Y Y • ; ~ ~ ~ o n T ~+ O AJT 00• owl i°z IAn 01C IY~ NS O i 'YY. PW W,N WNNW WYNW WWY W Y WW OmW10YN1yy:PWYN1POV yvO MP1YNPyWmYyvpOyOPNWnpINMWNNNDi OS+VNrDPNNVPP NNmPMyCWVWyNNpWpPNNPPwWNnNWN.•ONVNVpNp IZZZiIZliiiiZiirrrrrr rrrTDTTTTT6tWM»»SSSSZSZn OQIP T}T OpOMN»nYTmDAA• OOMmm}+DACCjmDA. O• Yi. yymnml.GVYmDA9 AOp ll.n1AAAAinyNV< YYanjl.SDOY=T rpjn a YnTYmriY.) m nNyPmTa.•}T n»~vN iND1Pf 04a. -In j nnyj STrmO-nrAri9fr»• SZCOmmo)A..DPOnw6ijZANO SSrim nMina.N m iij • am O. Otli. l rmmm yY ~• Srm rz rmzzNmFa»~ m »< o~ n'•n•» omNp r~rT N.l z°YrminArT`I+iaaa"y' i .Sm n: •Af nrXl ~r+TN. Conn Z O.Y OO E•/TY<s » Or C NSwAn iPTZ '.an mrNr<OD»Z»n im »TjsrOT1~M n N• n mnSmmN~~»mueimmmDOO»YCeq Sim rNT O N . m N mmr A°ODy m rAnx2u: '~ o~mfPZZ j am°/rmmmn aim _ Ao•°: .ryi :ei s ° : z ~r n mio n Te rzn.m s ci vn. 1 :Y y }. ~) Zw yYS'1+ m A T• MO O.• v S N i n N ° 2 n n P m rr OO NSCAONrTOOAT rOMAAADZ2aAWr3AmNZO:ir»i}}A~n A mpmA TmNm~m~9n< +mA+rr YCOmTO sr m o}i~m rz °T m.amrwumiwT } arm»»<Dn+.~mi~PnAT„r "irCA O )NN}NZNfZWO23Imyx2.1N 9y1rP-InPi}y<o 2ni OPp )»ONOO<u00 N»Amm AoOy)PmA pmtl N C.un~ op N~ <p IX . .TiTm m :E Nti)~C~Zti~~Z~TNY n nsnmlC Iz<•mixmA+noi+ nl IDnm°i . _ mwn rf~. r r> + mz ypzsz aPOCN v NV ywgnY.)• TYN.n .1D\+NiN}NSjAZn~AZnpO SmpV~)A} '".jn~non n Gnilwnn»rlNn nzl .a Mp };-.mmr mnn.n. '"inHZrern I niiAmxs.r ao.) .. i ITxm»xpNNTCNpo/pro nr»f mT2N <A NnC <T 9jmjlNm EmTCCM9Ct</T6< CO)m rmAr .2 T mVT:C rn3OrNNA 9mnD}mm Y<N} N yo1 mA41mS n }oA ONI iVmA)+mM 13PT1 r1AA<Om: N-. SN+mNNIS •Cmn»PAU NN.1rNPAOCrrNYr))OCm T_M: O ONCONp T nNf'.Wny<ONOOr NECN NVMm»T»{vp CU T _ ~ n• mI=AMO m• I.. YOmATO n.. Nmvivm A• X'C yNS 2 A lIr' NO »NNH NNE 1. Sa rp<NINNnr Ir «Am ni<rl a mofr will a i»an rf m~ A ~" Apr ~ ~~o n INyI~Tm Y(~ 01 ~. ADU OI m Nr a }N Nn P. wmm-. nr. »}i• N na Na }+ i m sT< .ly TAn.m N/V• iN O Nyre N• IOVM° MymffD yi mUN W N»TS ~vxAn mW i» ANVYm mm Y_ Nvxl vpw N mYU y OZ~J <O AV VAP : PO < yfP NWNN . o:T NW i.l ~~ ~ P• V nP Cm WP ON : OW =N P PP\ i~» un P »9 p A < m A. m m mz • )< . m.n PVY •VV+V+VyyVyVyVY~~VJVMy./IyVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVYVt +I+• +oNmVpNxWNnWNNNNNryNVY.vMNr~n.»•F.»•n rv»~v~pOCpppWj WNYONpVPN WNY OCm pNPWNYOWOVpN.WNYOWmVPN! NW Y N~WNWOYwOYPNN»O<nNNWN<NVONWU~iWPW NWr W4.0•PWNPO Nr OPOO .pNPNPNr+Y NONMPKWONNNVY00NWNWOVPNPNJP<NWWONP OO NPOPOOONmoO+ONJY00000PPO00NrONO..NNOOYYVOOppNONrONN WNOWOOOOpOONeµNPO0000N Vf000psPyq{q v.OCDO.I nimOVN ~Z• .mX °D i s" M O VT• A1T II .VnY 00 *) MZX X OYC r i tic M l~n y ONZ O O 1 iX0 A~• A:y •YJ ~:O XW X X X • X 3 :<: VWW WI+nn rVnnnn •S• lIPWMOVW~N VNrNPNNnMNUUrO! NNOmPN PIWYpn •a• YopPPOIPOVrVynmppprnmPmOWOVPYPOtlN• ppW01•WNYpOaO ryryNN aNaNmuNOaprNNnOYmmmNWnnYNPWmOmPn~VWltlNMYNlnMNW AAAfAn AfiA 9999999 OOOOpSiiiaafaS 00°Mwmn_._>)00°SMw w.•._.._)AAAAA<•'mmm.°>S>A i1.. Om LsA000 •>• arYUO.<YNP ia.Cy^w tAfn2rwnn)_1>mnnSmNNN„Cn •a• "iizr`•m p°°9rzma ° n.O.zm ^s. :y rrr•r Ta ,r ~OOOOA m`.Ty -.n ONmwCnT NYO iuPnN~ n r AynO n r^m'Y. A^r»S O>N. COnC 09 1A900 O Alnr• m<M • rT+ay~mr• onmcPmiexNnzN oas Te•m NO9~ mAmr:n azi•a~ r: ° ~imsiu.w.:lm-ovncc>o<i °.°..°..°.' mr °m~erl"r ni zd rn-~ n . "v~c.N.i niin °n'znig ~mw n: rzyzzyA•m z zzm >~zn zxmaey vA<yc• o ny >p> ii i i i i o miiioN .z. ii> m . . '^ riim ~N 4 i . r~5 Nr . c~ o N yz .. .. .. 0 9w mn i~ sz i rn n iii .. N< w z . °c> > i rrr n sA ccc zz PP n9r9nmrNZrNraa 9rzrmonpNN~9wrcxnnssAZAaa as ~oorP~iccin.izm>Mm ec oo°aNmzw. cis > acomm>mm.mmm ma.r iii ~zyYNiyrNnN n wzNeerNr2iNi° zzmNNa9i9T9+<N a ma.cwnsm-ICZOnaNN• „ii ca~zc ccczz occNOn i 'a Nx . Nx m ymizP ozL.a:zzy. °i+no r°A tlPS Nr9e-ly~~nro•r. °°omm NCmaCeCi A9N°OImZ~ Tn91<C~VN<n~m\n~lnnl~~ Noo> o z9 :cNm:pA aii 9•ery9 SO YN:N rn zs mea2A NOy ni> NYINnn MI i ` o°oz° Ae.FnyN«ANTe oac~.z coo mNmaLNmcNNZmm m.p ~imN4n\nY<A O y SnOy ~tN A.A r POa0imO30mmn yi.a Say ni _ NN •.• yN A>f Dn Ta A mmrN SmL CC olOl ms2mn v nN w•\Y A9iSTN < 4 9mi m99 •O• ~iyT•~ rYa Anr SA •y0°9 M YO NY9 m0 99 •S• > JOryynC OS•.mTSm O Y !AC_ _n 1NrNOONrr NNNn\xP nY SY a na0• m\9a Oy p OS 90MN11Nww • n • m°ayyYYiZ OYr Ca AnH211iNN • 'V\O aOAamm•) NOn_ Cal N NON\~'~ Iril itw AAaNO O? ~Y O Yma Aa IyyN ae ~ A a nn )f1 Ln n NO ~ma°T TCT y0 ySp =y A D^ • N V • YVYy YiN S~11m.1 ie iy ~ • P anN O Y• iONm • N v0 YOe NN O rC ' N ~ s N° WM P n i . r aii .m . .< as m ..m• mmm ~ m •PPPw IPePPPPPPPPPPPPIPPPPPp lwwP4wPwPwwO ..YVYYVYYJYY~.YYYYYVY4MYYYVYMYMVM.IVVYVYVVY•IYyYYVYMVV< YA a.pmiv ~PPPPPPP>PPYN 131 PwNnOaOYPNIwNrONmYPNPWN/OOPVPNPWNnOtlOVpNPUNYONOYPNPr •O• 1 9 •C •a 10 ~y •m •a~ P •> OP• NPN •A•\ •a• NNpmOnr 00 •OW NPP P NNPwONOYNO.00PWY°WOYNNn N.p .pNNOYNnY • !\ O!a WPPn WNw~N OPmNVP •O is•o •ON100WM.NmOOrWOrN000PONmOWNOm~IM OY0000N0 y± P,,..0=0=0Cii.JGDJVNfPatlOOPPOmN000POWa0uY00mOOVO00OVu • •• • •> • •P ;m ~ 1 il! ~ • 11 Y • • • P • • • n A r~ 9w* Ay O9i • n Oi0 lin myn VNi O O I :<: ,T. N :;: VWNWW O• NNMf PN11NNNNN10jJ'IN MNNMNP`IWWW . YNyVPiiPOYiiN ~A~ iWNPNP yO OyPWNOPYN NNNNNNN •P~ <t«<CCU~ly 1~IN<NN 0000 ~T• miLL<LL P< aOm2ZT>f 1GN4 OOPP»N» OTS`•ZMS :NSSn1 }poaarNN~zerYNN~oz zrm m. in+~ °.°n .°n mm remsTOmNnr ~, r+~.A.i~-I •mPPr "o•snvnz <otimP pc NI •'zi N4+ =•oN rziz mp oil~nmrymn?s niir.• N >r~nN ' °} ri e»~ z~ o <SOnr~ N oiv2iinr I°omil w.'no i~~• I>,~i> < s it y w .'I.n neiUm s`c '" n' m-1o o,°fi iT >An ni- T " ~ r a"N w r" i > u Np z m .. zz (21 m °mnn N ~ . N <00 m • ^ r ° r N T s ^ r n r c i P zr+oNSds4nNG>av.°•~i r rmo~> ps`NII N°as~~n:eim^n zNCmANimc r.W.e r ONSerN ici+inr iN iNNri 4}mPNIM o~sm~mz No r o ° •. orri T "> ~i4mr z 9^N°n}A O4A0 nnPmN yfy4<OmTrUNTy m~~NLpyLn lwdO I.~N AITm~}CGZ>On Nyi2PimPy • n •m p iK ~ YHhZTOOi TI'nTTdT. n~ iw Peda A4 T.N1=CN0• p n)n >::=4TN . NI O =CENMTi^yOPPRdp2 y Ci•I WN° 1i4yr2PTpTrTnrml pHUO~N IoNN NS• T~ N• ti 1 0 O>G :n°NAMJO• PI WNrr=nO 1N Y I N d}P O NiP T~ }\ N '1 PP N y P N d Yf= >• NT T NN r P ;" pi7 0~ N r ~ w Y I" f n a i~,N ^ 2 n .. p. P}Pi~ Pd P PPPPPwPwwwPwPPwe -IrJJN.'INiJ~I< w +yy~IwwfffP •I ry'~I~NNy<rrNy"n N NNNM~•NNNHNNNVnrNYN/rNNNONN° fWNNOiPYPNwWNNOidNPNwWNNOiP~IPN' WWWNN N ~ ~ ~ ~ • 0 N M N ~+ N<P NNYPWPfP~ .p NuIrNN u u OYN NiNNUNN j O<ONYNUNNPVMNONNJVOOyOOYYOwuVP pNMOONNV V OOMONNiOP000fONV~I N pV PYMOOOOOYONONNOWO Ni aY y• _~ ~ . i i i • ~ ~e: iwi 4 }no AyT O42 .. n Os0 j}n O C yn ~Ni O f 'C t2 YO j1 :T a~P '~\ •~i yj0 1• NY WW ` w aruarr Wnrrv~W ~ ••n P•• NN•W' ~i mpPONPpWYOmY NpPm-1p NpP m00 J rONmVPJrnN~i PWmVOPNWJPWVmJN! mIPV .p NN P 14 v W n N nnPPPPPPP PPPPPt»Yty YY»> Y AN r i O CCCrnmm » » > CCNNN3rrLTn•Y t YOCCn O p• m A >YNmGNAaaNrNNNNmrn nnNnn TOrOr P n> i O n NAOnryrN ZT 010o NYOA • rmA Y •• Nm• 2 rrlmnN'nrnnn AefymTa> nmOAG m ]• • a m rNmvemn rm i~~nrr:eo ocz > vc > T NrNncrAer. m-•mrnrl Tr AN ° c. my im. momTrr->izi vut r~ i ~ mo.°.e:iM~ .°,c-Im ~w°c°veem Y:.o n.Y.r `: ire i °c N minA iyeNN C :~ zor i SyrAO 3V >CnOTfm G ~ O ~ i 2mtYn~l l'1rrSnrO> An N •A•AN Nn AS -12 O {TZrYA Nlnl 'S > S Y • m2 m Zr NONTr rr .mo ° c mi: rm Y i '" «dCa~~>°° r as mr ~ zzrm rr >•. co ' o zN N z« • cY+in ~ n %+ T• yy n • m iiz -1 z i • n i n~~AramvoAi °tnnreors~NmcY{{ rA~aN ° m ~ A2Y STrrmT Z'110i ° mSNn{~• A32Z PS N• y K AAN-•>CPCn>ACYArC m12v SSN O r mi> L-~>ASrN YA .X 1 » O>n iGtOmOYOOA«n>SYNr>N)CArr Nnir r• nr>VAO :aft OOnm4prr m Nm30i 1 v 33N-•ANNNTOS•• OYN2nmAVTZy>3 SN m T • T L N YLCLr TOZN 2 2m «iY •ny Om C 22a nL>nZN «_OAYVN 2T0 A m .•Z<i{SMrm TOAr< nOOr T>N>N V LN • m r An Ynm YC O>mrN SN OOr^Orr•r AGOnN<• rMNTi• 9 OfIm1 aP Z. \ mC T OC mL2TY {T-IN N V iCC NOn OYT mii TNa>O v ar L PPrY.\w_NN mP100\NV2n2inm OP PNL)> M!•O C NH O O•n CnrAmOmY >A T.C{4C uG>22 Pzr i N 2 n N •nN>Na Nn a•+ONNVNN 9rnm ~\Om rl)• _ • YifONT\ AOyP rTm >O A rrr AO> m2 NO •I INr n l+niNa Namur NW ri ni n ••F Om Y O N ~o r9a o\O LI>' mi 22 O Y m20 S• mN2 m ~ Nn n nnNnAn nY Yzv oLimflW Ni SN n >On /12rn2nYn n J NNN m n mn n2n n mn~C^ OfP NCT m= r > J\> i Pi •O ZYO• ^r2n P N\O L T >L <On CA _ y> Nf !~ P iY \ V O\m POOP N \ • OAOON NNPyN n /r9 !O N N y 2P Of WPOw IO i _ r• V > • °> • • Y YI 1 1 IYI rYl n •f• flff!! !>1!• f>f• lf111• •!10 •• VVVV JVVMPPPPPPP{ PPPPP OwNNNVN yNroNm.~pNlwNVCY.mVPNlwNVONmVPNlWN«mmv NlVPNrmN«wNVP 1'r ! 11 p 11 • P Y V V 9 V V V V V V V V V O N•• ! ! N V N N p rN r4 WN mpaPOVNFP1ur •ONOVONO ern ~•NVO Nmm\WONmrNCOmOOmw 4•J O~:0002~~0-~xu N 00 • V rv v.vmop o >W ; P w ' ivi •O• •>~ mY Y Y2~ YN• •OY Y Y Y Yi• Ys YA X2i YO• M X II) XAX ~3Y NT rA OT2 ••i0 YAn )C IYI N3 O = > Y ~~ YP Y m PPN'WnrrrxW.M lOrC~M1UNi~NVnNrNmfVOOr SON MVVNmJNUaIWOmNJNp.fYNp1mWW°PmJf WmmPNWm~mNOJ mnpNWNm°W •NPPPNf OffMNJPIOPWWMnJiJOWWMr1NlpWN Na szxxzzxxnncvannTTTTmTTTmmmmmmovvppeoepvvvnnnnnnnnnn izn vvwmn~n.ac-larmmmcaavv......c <zszra.. ......mmmmrr>ca°orns:TP zrraaznnNm..oozzr>szA +<Nnovzr+mTZ+ ii. rSZ2aminN~nNaormme~uO~N AYZ TT~O)•O~w Jzrmrmr>orla roe ei-: i-.aa r vr>•m .Ni Tz al"z x..TAe viasezzr mzmrz nna=~ +m zn i+~ivsmawn. ~ m2zi a..iz2 ° c `vmpiAm Jn. eTa p+e „. mi. cNmwWw x ~~Jr> n°, mO ZCFi 9~~oPr >o mNa ~~ .. r Hi-n o.m _ .. z.z, lm-3 Nz °o oy °in° mi > ..ar TCTZ~ r2 r >ozzNn PJ zr > ii .I n°c T2 Nr 2 ZnmrOmm T2°+O +I T2aN non +' ~ flan si Nn it "ne o NA wow w>JAn C 2.W 22+Cr n _ _ 1 r 1 2N • ti1 N +2 v0 T T n 2 y T m 2 f1 S y ~ n N N on azNO nTNOr<o rvvNNZ~mNaA°v zuoara<norm " rA-~mm cmm••m°Nmnz as<mvT.AV m<Ti.W~~IYm mr<n is>JT Y~wCmTnrM~TTal=oAammrTTmJ.rAl [°iTmTnnm zTZNm>T noc~+ zzNO azwnnmm~: cca w: con cNVaTC ii: +~Na`+A MZnnnm A~rmmi NnaT nn rm> Y za n...l>n.snra z v. rz m >or w.c.n+T°>o zlmc•oyv.msmOZe vTw>ro :mn z n~~Aw yTZr rJJN.. rTT zpeaT z+n °cirlr ov rNNZ~N~r .. azaN~ NznNiNi~>a ArN m3 n Paz z. eNmexc m zmcpzvaTyw~ zw°x a maNTOmy+ m~ yti T..Nm Amz>z pvJ<In xnim..ze n O2 Tx:3 yr TniD x.3 N4T mJ:Yn n<O 33+ONT <+CiNSV= A<an.<.c wTnJe mc3nomm •cN NrTZnmrNw rJ mwn yr n re Y3 LrnLOmxxn°om:AiC+OiPrwyTa>JCr Ox.ON emr A°Nr In ~~O < r•) 1 TOO+T mm i0Y<.3mTTAC YSNNTmT mn m y T NwN O IN nNr NL• m ~Nm N •Z AOITTA r0 zenONrNmFNaTW n<mnm Nm •n m Nm n:< YmOr eNSO m S OC OF J 02 C N ° n W~ x. z zzanm + n>s ^az NN Nm nm ml° mmT ~mm nN NTNnezN+ or im w i'"na 1°oncmNO <.. rr'~ rr a` .3N zRm<m2 r+ y.r.NZ r sN z r Nny I n N ~< i+ula.~ ~ r CY NZ Sw 6 __ nN i N N A •n4H Pn0 O rn \J•r iCrA r W< ;N i ~ a m m_' fAW1 P tl_ N _ N• . J r + O S • P < n 2 u ~. x !1> 111f>fff>!!!>1 ff1111 >ffff>lfllf!!1e V .IJVJJJJJJJJ< xn r e po ONOWO NNV~~NVyA fill lu,,~nOamJPNfWNI-pam.PN1WNY°NmJPNfWNnpimVPNfWNrO!>JPN> Prr AAx\ pop NWN NN NWI > pPWNUO~! uNUONNn'YNIPPNVyoJN Iln~\ i+PmOJ •' mWNNON! NIPNOf pOWONOpiWrmurWPOWWUWONPOWJmWW°ON p~aO W OONfOOpNmP°OOWmJVNOP°pNaJp+uu T py.u ^~T4YV^PNC9"pv.0 xn Y 7 °n .r.o OTi •• n oio ra°n iyn ur i O O W NUNNMnn •~p V•.pwlVOrN Wy~NNnP WP °NPIµNOPtln NplNnr ~Z. •O. O.PIpOIJONyOrMNNMVIY IOO N.ptlI N.Oy NntlVONW.p tlp0 P ° •O• .r ONPWOtlrNNNmNnyNNrANPNNNNrW NVOIONWNPWAmNNNNNPPtlPN . •P• ~ OZZiliii2iaEiiitiiiiirrrrrrrrrrr}}}}}}261w»nrwZiz3 ZY aT.. L0000nMmmmmnn>.> <CG >OOZZSrr » SZSZn •)• Z rCAaOLnNV<9 Vaarr_ON<NnVPnt2..r _n0»>CIwV 2r6.00i0°<9 fp0»y00rF>Pmm.A.:lxZN2r } T31nON~r tl2922»ryi~NO'AO» i 9~ ~ - .9• ps•n>zam°mv rNAU amen n i. vz<znmaa r .ms. °a«9 i r 1 ° rrA r«miz N+oo°re » m z>m N:m m yc« . •pen. m z«mNmozva :-. rmravwn ,~"m a. mi°izn s r _ z a No>x Nxr.r ozw .}m -<.ms ea...i sa~xm mro0 °o Apm i°mnmPZOi~i ~ N ~r avii f n `~ g z ` °miis ~ mi° A + . I • . e . c npo zsimNn:m yrn mr Ho Nnn w mi ° ° y N ° ° ° . . . .az mm n ~. . y. .zN i s r no.y nz Nn rocN w o i» < - ° ° m me is z .n op s i r cm c:z N iH~ i - ro C ^ Z • Z n n O .i• < o r n i i ~ z ~ i ~ s z « .. n e nr r N n i n ~~.. < o~ 9 s. z i : z<nNZno°orNOZOr<rNSi.nsaNNav~ryN»N<z : «~ ~ >m°m n<m<wc < > Pm.rmmm. c:-zrn» m tee «zzn<zmvmoNm~mazzi>«Yey4~na»ws«vfz:r ° ii< W :sr ina n z«« mnaeAUN<rAewoae <cfyos«wewm mi yO:mna Pnynf»2 iNA nnNOZnNm.NOZ.nsM2 Z~.EP n> ~o. : n >nA.mr.n n.w. a. >«rn:<r om> mozm > ern mymio<». ao<zm. zv s Ipz>iAyrmm ms's i°9°.Ni cc°«s~»<sic°vzi Nm<z s~°s evmz ve~•»}rNenNN<>s m«> o . iN. s y OZmSZiO i OmZfZMwnuST~m~yyZN.nZIZN^mE O_uZA P+a m n O~^nn m T>m =• _ n<n VnOO. yyNw NM ON iim m ~CnY nV0 On<m O m.wC mi<O i 9~0 u<CL n 1 TNa n ' ZZODU00}~T<O mnNYrO eT EeO m•~ +•r r0^iTmrCr N A' m0 ACCT 9mOmn Tn A ImniY A«Zm C1 I C A ` T n » 00 n • ii. <nZ' 1 ` >t SnAi OMmTy>YmN4.is • AO > OI PAAn>••I nE C12 ^rO.N O PT am < _. • °TS n N :rr~LWYCn N<mrNOrrn rr2m ramONNN Cm mNOiOxn. 3 mmLni V»••PNVUNmP n 4Nn m •nYCT NS< rv ~ ~ ES O.O m y m.u . mrmmlgW .m. 1 r ryN eAl o NPmm m • Nira~rl N nrsr n. !` o«y •E.. °o N.ril N:oN c y I Wn e m;'" r :•ic r.m N»»» ° i~° la-~~A ~ ~ rr. i.N nr l ^i ° r.c i an a~ n z«P z«cn m n n• N • Ni N ._OV a <rV Z S 2 i !~ . .a2uni NV .P N n > O i N~ C ~ • 2• V a y .•m f nM 1O\ P n . ~ NOnO my • .•NM . O O C OpuNi VV WO a N P !N P SP y V n O ff • 9A m.f < f m • - •C• I.111!!!!lI I.I!!! !l.llYll.ml.f1! •11.1 f11f1 !!!O ! . •VVVVVV V MYVVVVVVVVVVVVVMVV.IVVV 4 y M">aaXwPNkPG•'': µMV VvµiW u~1µr l~~VI. W4MWUN iZX mluNrOOmVPUluNrOtlm~rP NIUNVOymVPNlWNrOtlmVPN1WN»OtlOVPNr 10• O •C •2 •O ~L10 •\ A .p r~nN •!nN r• Np P • .+P.Gr! NPP •1VnONVPWnNUNNOINaNOONNPNN ! VVP! .\ ~ e J OmOpN..N lOOOON 00 V!!WN • OWNOOOV N.•ONN1.•OONPONO OOOp+uVO»ONOOOPI.•OOUe..q O_OSC V.~GFPCOl00000ea«PNO1mwN iY I10 %+ f I X YW M Y ~ Y g WY NW rr•.rYNrWNWNNrrrNNVW Vw Wrw w N r•r •i• wpuoMNO w'w ONWwwwww4VNPMOONWrNrJNMwNNWNONNWNd:pPNwWNPm .O. wOrIN.JwmrmeW~NNNNNN~O~°pN r~`pJ NPNOriPPONPPmMN~mWOmNP•N•N JN ~1r i<CCCIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNAAaAA T99999TY9T990em :~ .2• aorrrm) ))))zz aoc. ooomossrrrmmmm~)PCOrm) ` a ie = 2 isi 1 .y n..ArP smP.rmx:zzrN.<m..zosv o+ annwnm+ io. m" nr`r r~Niiiiini.A.li Amfl'IEm `Nr nmor irisTi~~icnwTN2n rmmrrrrr. ii+JNan:i~LN•zo~m).A n P ni y • in r<.i )im~iwwaewor •A=ios•°~ <ez .r Nnpmmmmm m•+n nm. eAmm=lm +i9~iFCmni °c sc°s i aNa + lc- remL Sn Nrac) :A)°x `i .°.°.°•~°..°. .°.ic•.r P )uziP. vrrrNm nn°c Vii: m T cm ~ 4 i ~ m s ) r 1 PC + OGOOO woo.2+ < ~{zzzz . mi zys2 ~~rco m.a+ i r 41 i i i n• . ° poi z::r ii c~ a: T:r io )y))) : A°i u 14yy eN~ ~np u222Z2 A OCM•IN Om . .. r. r•.•~. N w C9m TSD mTP • 4y... -Irr w xxxxz ~ N .e to n • z z ~~~rr--~ a N i i. ) )u i n rrrrr • n cpccc zzzzz znn ) NmPNNNi~rNOrmnNnzrmo N•. npAm)u mmm PNPT NnN ° 9 O w 'Y i < TNZrz•.c : rNmcAOn~^ 3 m rcNT~ s~ c\ r cm um~arw Nr ..r sr T3rrr3NOO r.. o c nia ) ~ n n V " i ~ V4~~w m o m Nrl .o.N snl 3•mei~2• i n • . ~. z 1 a ~P y: v ~ is e m NF\o mn c PoVOOOa nie c mcnrr n r o N: o : `" y cr . r~)~mzr\INF11 )i s+ A smmr ~.•mr. rs romzm nm . arN~ Tpae zNmWwiN«e... NoNOZpz TnArTA~n •.N rNCTNp TA°CyCnNNZNNNN n N iCPiy -ri . <AA Nn• nrP••••NS OZN•a iio: OpZOi •1Z NO +NS3• mi N° E mpel AlA2rrTZ I IIION Ar.N+• • < + n* _ _ LL~~ n'ZiG+l2TOn OZi oWOWneNA • Cn3nAA )I.A • ZTnSC mr•~ -~•~ n Nm A + nrYmrnAYTU1 ~+. mAre P°mPeTT N2. mT•rT m2 <AirmAPlTAZ TTT9 1A mON V Ar T A •OJ < n TT~O TS A • Y r ' _ ~:O n V ^ A _ fmTC CTnr TD•9ZT niN m ) IIIT F CN i ~O. TZ y A P OjY)NAmyNOOYPmaT 2.1 OA•SCr ZCNC C •21C SrL Iw •i• n m2.`r: r NO. e~ C~SNO 2N iu •Z ACOaN C•a rlnm\Tm +P r <iNiP .•A •NA•n0 Ym T r~ • yr MN N • 1 AC A : : ` N<A3 <aY A m w I u YJ Oa + ' e N ; ~ S Ni4 nn O A o1 S G ~i ~P N~n ~ a C < 'N rr r. N mN~i0 raon 'Ni+ 3 P N m M . 1 ) NZ y NOOa PPi~ ye Tr P ~ 0 3 N a ) V o _ p rlo Tw n N 1 i N;N r) P i r NNp o . n • P CP p im . A a z _ m .. z w N P OS A O i o 2 C S ) N < •wwwl nwwwwwwwwwww wwwww wwwww wwwl w ~ - ' w ~ 1 . r .•JVMnI i ~.. ..J-• -~v.-1. -I.Y -•~l- 1 ~i~ eN ~i iwFww wwwno o w w Wwww Wi.~~ S Su .WO ~,wo<aaiummommmmmm wm U a ° ° ° izu PNwwNromm+P iwi.r ePm .~~wNrm<m.rP N.wNrmPmvPNwWNroPm. ~ ,P . .o. o ne :o n .+ P NrrNw .\ NJr wWo immO.mmN1NMNNONVrmmNNNVNNPbr NOmoN N y\ owNNnw NPmmPNrNOPNNNNNN OU iPw mPPOm OONOP 6 NOn V Omm + JeoroeNOeeNNO CaGnvNwuaoromPUOm ° musa~OOPCxO . .n •T 9 NNMW ~Zj •°. ruiOrrPryO~s WI±W •AF Y Y %iiiii iCC •S• YSm YYY TSAS TnnuuNrxyuO FS• yyY°r~u1T NnOm2• F °LArp n• ..s°nm emo°x~nn msa°za ..r z~y +omezr.mzmmPN TaAmm:axi io na `~. :cia: " °z rr., "Tr,im n oor i m .zN. n a i~ s ° as s y o ~'i mN°M1YZ9u) o0°icaST°ix MioxyiaTCr~IA iii °YCC o ymon°re rsAni eNmmyn °Nr(iON OryO~Y •T• _n 0_ O_°_CmoyTT C ! ~ ~NruNr+N p AyeOmmY(Tip O~= ~w°A OrTxaAO sT mi °zi.z.W TZ Nnim izi ry0Y6.+A A • ±T~ tlA~N °Af1 m ^OP TT 00 ~ a*ON yaa ~ O T ATN ST ~_ r 1 NS M \ST A W fl 2 u .1 umT a •i• lllllff• Yt •VVWUUUUwwWN~Na ~2~ Oc¢yP U1~WhrOas~: °FC FS ~O F0 FF nPN ^JO'wNtlN AF\ P G°PyPO WOOtl°Oy FSFP ~^ t+_i n9ACC5AlC~ ~° X F F • F F OOY orz zz OY° =A(1 14° u3 O ~ /~ •YNW• N N NN Nrr!! rNOWIOOY'NOOW www!• NN6~NN p MOr ryW W 'WMmOO Y O M PPlblWOyJbWYWMPWWyPN UUriOfO~~yi~p0 Wrr O mWaOJOVIb n V iinAOnmPanPOmpn ro)..a.)a . )r)b Nin °N:m:'s `1Yn .°~ i A AO:f)HaY)CyNNnS2mrPymPAr~ m 2> Snm frNyMm T. ZNnNNS r n:A Y mSrVDOryP n r OZS>Twn-VIT2nMFOON22DSM F O ymm)Nm T yyONZAmATmrm nnJOOr).lOry2\ iy'~ T TONm SOn ~ T iO~ONJ.P V02N'•.A ADnoCSOnm> 6 AZNOi: O : nP ym .o r noaai °o •N~ :A m)_r O.m o2y4200Z'yyTiyi m2 Nr~m my ryT A mPTT rN Z mm Sy Z m Yy~rC•00. TO Pnnmi Tym * NOrZOrF i ~ N i\m~mADnOyArtmuy C .9 y~~PA~T n mJNJO'mAf~flN N. Ney°AO°'° n'a mm~ r N)° nLZw ~ milms 3 ec myzim ti~NamiiNmNNm mm') e m iNm r ms'a°n<P~ w iN ec•JNN n "zavN ymy s<. zy~m « m O fSV mmL )P 1~0 0Y 'D J~~ > m ~eMi r 2 9mrmN n z NT ~,i,• s Ac is°s N °n y+= _ i • y~ • ~ y y • Ynm N m A m n s m °' i n u n LJVmJnOmmNCOZn>m90mAC yMnYmOiN mT. 3 nnnnH9PaD mIGM^)mWmOpisOO VCr)mpNNm;MNrimC viC OrmOM;m T r y}'n=N A mm;P 00 O fS21r01 _ _ CriiNH2•rf yNM Z CMrG2„imnaPN rrC MyyfmMiT3 OntiPJa.yrZOPm y9mn OON . iiZM.CO.P O_O_wm.n3NC.T>m2N OGPYn.iJA )AA CJ ..ONiiT N °y n9 J3)mNeZn_n;lii N_Oi ryNOJNM m m nnZm A i t srJimnNn SV P'mOD m9 P 2339 AAO yy PS O N ' Z2ymOOnnN t•2NAT: rV n29M •T T NNGTZ~)A m O ; OvOJmAf30m~ 9Vyy nNm\ y O OOi ti <y i9 r V 9i • 9nA)CiN a OZ 14 flnmNnZ r r^ OPZATPPSCmNI PS rnyA9ZJ OC rJPmS: )amiv x .mne 1 a9m1 °°i i i N m= ~ ; N2iy NrOIi 9 1A N m\N99J)N N r N ~ < O ATO\ n9nN0 MC OPN _O 111 mti_sY1Z n_ n mNi[N9 Mm 9NmAmCO mJS TC AD o T O fl S ~ N rZi»•Zyi9! Oe9m N m AIL m OiPNO O \\111m NO O m n ~myNN\ n•_yi ~ IfOiN TL y• p0 T nr r L _s°~mryPN m m ^ Nr eezi+: o m mNrnm nD ~ m JNN m~ ~ iy Ncyimm G~ c z mr.r~z o.N• ne mL i Ln9a n'n .mow r9nonr J \ lyl! yn m 9o nun ssir.o iT nrno ^P-NP O Z C Z y ZO O nmm Z wNO~\ \N O_ . ~ •\~ PAa QPmO~ 1 ~N~r T OJ • N PNM N ~~ O V Z .aw• m w mm m 1 ICI ° m• 11 A P •rPP~lP~PrPPPP1PP1lPPPPPPIPPPPPIPPPIfPPPPpIPPPPPO rP VJJJJJVJVJJyyJJJJyJVJJJVJyyyyyyyyyVyPC mP09OrmmWrYJJ~rJ.P1 ~I.Pi~ppaStPPPLtNPNNNNMNtLtitttttt~Ntm WmypNIWNnOdPJPNPWNrObmJpNlWNrObONPWNrObmJPNlWNrOrOPr www w wwwwwwwww we v v v v v •rPr ~ ~ ~ uOerNN APWNPbuliP.'c~N OaoN~OmO~uOr OJO~S4NCPONrpmJOOi NOPNryppQy00Y YCY C'u V U.vOxOCW..+rJCaNNmOe PN W WWW U WfpaNNION N oew o weevnrid6ee e I :< :_ ~O •i •. Y Y• m: i c z P H m 0 M b n A N Ar O myll ooi 09^ yi O O ILn My~ Ni O O . I/ YPPOYOVMYWYOONPYIONVOfNN•V•M NIWPOOVW•W NOHOO •W O• NPPO••NVOYON••NWOOlmY00NPONNNbtlOwmVWNPwtltlebOVmP/POOW NNUNNPNWPMf OI WMWNNIPfYtlpONVWWO••VYtlVWNV V••O PPbNPYOWNO 2ZZOOwTT~))) CVAAOmpNmi<Ar)fGC9HM w•pin T))).000CiOTn)Y CCSnnNmlp m22SAANTMTNUyA.« n1 <y2 ArnOZ2)V .N SfatnNrwT :~.NP2aTny1.2 )T NI V.r Y<ny9. 32~ NSxT rmfl)nN2 )y_TnNNVSi0YS9AN•nOVO<AONTSTOA.ZS 002r•ZTTaZVV Z)O r<: >OA YZ3NNNT OZNN>1tiT OrA) N m9io~sv• °: .°.'rmym ~ wmzii z• mz•sp~ rarer) is. p••xoom°c~ .nimNia) mar .A•c ~s2 ca•>.) nT9mY ez r-Ni<p• m o.Np.A~ s•i ~ZN~Z ZNZOC m=1nr) yws oln.•n<mn TwAaTnOmONSlCIH220.n V1<4 wNY N!'~f~mm Vm•NV NS<OTpwiO> n xwmzw.nNmxs z wo r. zNmT9r zem.znpan. ~i mo nip =1NZn xx mir rN mS N• w nM • Srm +S TCO 00 yNS Nr~iO YA •V• 2 1 •V m nNZyx SP nSU )I•N2S O • NyN n • _On V • 1'+T ~i~n O N NH~ ~ N O mOA • O T N GTC • T N 3N _ c i m Fr C ~ 1 <y SY < J 2N iy O n N N • _N < V O_ m w n r y m p • Y Y m N;::T.ti99A000irrm~mWrwmAjTOYAmG)OOSrr•3•N.O[A1'1<Tm~~~AOT. SNwTwP.TTNZNmwTT9 nATAwTtlaCTNNr.w<)ri~m TATMNYKT)S 1E O.y20PPZTNA~nwZ9T)OVZnVS4pnZrVnPpn m Ar T331n9T100 O_>rAOp>iNA O>TOOGTOT T.V OE_)_n OnYV)>CCOY>NANn •nii_TSCCNZ yrC193Ar)rnMfNPNA N>ZT ~ AA3TT3NN093npV• mOfZ' .NOOiEmNpOO IZ AinNii•SlMnTOMpnYNNnT~All Frli NnYiTNn1NNTm nATmm< 3V••<n TSOTriATO m0 NnV VT1 OynVT) wnn SAIInNPVTm iw0 A«Ni O iO i EAGf rNNNA000mO0• p O.NN rOln r NOTMT<O:O OVA ATNyin TG < 3T<YO •Gm VNrCmZnAn~ ZT f OS 919 OTTN CST OMYT9NW )TOOT) T Tn ) m9Ti::aNmN\ A TmPNAreMTNYNON.9V< SNI VOAA n0 NT1 GCrrA OCT_Ti T rOnCrONrWT T\TVG C > AICw iTA NNmNpNPTNN TT :N <StpTTNATNNnNO NiNN SN T •n wn ST P w TS• O. OV N• i. NNmT •S\i nA AN Nr ONi NSiT Y \••C I r1yiW Nr 1T NVOp Cw •>Vir prNN r YVA Vm0 SN r i N< rN C T. Nt An fn NS• ON mAN!• n ~n 1 O(' (1 NnT NnS PT a Y 10 A 3ZTVT T T NT W y VZ !SZ Oi > V P tY M1rly A N)i NZ r E fNN O m x0 m SnN Om e W NSVSN OtN11 T LT V rN OT OSOT N }Nn ~ in sr ilm. mr n ~• a tl az r zi+i W` V Ka nV V \n N m i OC O TM O N b2 O _ _ __ _ OT O• • m• O m A wIp• wwwpl4ll4lwf wlflf4wwwP llPfllplww!!O VVVV VVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVMVVV•1VVVVVVMJVJVVVVVVVVV< uµ4u4WWWwNwrvNNNNNNiNUiinrN•nn-ii~oao00pYf •S •G YaN tlJNNNJUNN9 ObmVPNwWNYOWmVPNwWNY 000MPNlVNYONOVPNPWNMOtlmVPNwWNYOr p WNM WN•• r• Nmtl MNNm MwNN NNN NPWrYPWNN NWNNNOmPnWYmPr NONfNVYOP P• NbPWNrO VOtlPrYVNWONtlNONwNtl000 OPPNO~• OONOOMPO OWWNNVO ONIPOONfWVONOWONmOOP000 GO~rOGlDOVOOwNYOVOOGGpNNN©VdOVmNGP Gr+F pOGLPONOLOY000 e ~V~ •Z• •T~ ,N~ in• YO\ IN' \O• •i• 1 ~ Y i i i~ •A• :A• ~OII N T it 1 TNA MVA OTi n O)O N)C Nyi ON_ /~ u VW••••Y ~+ W NN WW W WWrrvWYWW W NVry!! urpOVJbbOONVWrV~lVMOµWOOMVVPPNNVVNW•IOVYWVNfYW••NVOO YONNiOPONPNpFp••...1lO Yp~ NMYIrrOIONNrWMYYrYM O••VMNONOMY N PNnVVtlVWhONMNNMONIOPOPOOYPPPNVFJPrNWOWVIy TTFimniii~ii°ziiooamm~'e~nis~ico•rinmmmniiiicii il}ilmiaea OCT~OYANAMnnNnAVVAAO{y~ }>NZnNVi<p^)^>LiiZZO>YyA~MxZxN <11wpw10T1TNA°SOOOMN}A••>TI~iC>Si\Zi>ICCO~NNr}wy 2i ZNZ3 A^ n AA rTr T2ZxNN••rN Z•O••OiTT•1TTZi•In• s mOZT ZAnT• pAA!> ryN N} \» NNLP•i• •2. OMAN ^nm Tirr n~i- n•T w•Vl ° •mf•pOV Tw} SV H D 1 CEm O nV TYS INI•T Al:mr 2TTA 9TC °nAN •M ENyN•T_O>}rA2AONn)3 1P CL 1.1°TZ ONr AOPVO°i PST DfA'YCPC CrN2CMAi r0"nAAN ~m2 "y fTi nNNA•T•OIr'° )r Or• > rCUAyNS2AD <A\IPCm ZO mN yPZP°h C TrN NV>Aynn 1M T AI\i TTa rrrwi ti i Nn °A m ArA9N>NN i ApiAp T?n •1 v AT}T •+r nZnT ON2Pyr• m rP> n O= YO• I INCw C A N °_ A ' V w ^A T• ) rCZi SZAw o N n^ n p L~ 'IY m r ~ S 2 O NT J T O AZ >mpw"oc' x i nm n rp h Nn i>hP i x r + {w nr ezz. m T i oe m mn c 's N i Az Nz i N < n < p F m m Nii OrOOwAnP000pniA0YT0 AViim'•Npp N PCOOrAY:1Fp>A00 CiMZOyNGr°OCir{m°>mPTr\~T>m• CC°Tmm9TiiT>T miT{< >rzrmmpNZwm >{wwAwNwNPnwwafrwnezTmwe TaTmP "=1i„~•~{rNr tiTyehir zc+c•s~NSecs iwfoocom°rcNCAp r0 O TOOmrip Ei nn li Ni>OwnmNiMnO03MNiEyyAZnEww iA0 nrrhA«NiwP°imOmnahTOP°• OiNMVnpCEYwnOm< O>O » n'•T iMNNwP ZOiY°Ti yPOfi r >wiwmJ SAinN> n> i Pm ~nnzwonrmmxn>NZic w>n ip wuwN wN~sA N Nii <a°~r'•z. T' Tii is<T: rFwei ArawA~AA mPram~oowwzwimm Z}N~MU On~>PpC Air>T nOSMMiNii T}4••N yOpniTii yT• i1\ OTNi YONOT l13 mTmyi~~IIi i}HA iNiY•1 pNpiZO «rT°Nm it n< NJmr>iZ~CTinxnOC Ni> YOwvTT> •2 <pNrNnOnN >r r° iAVN1 NiNry NTr'mp0 IAV ZA=:NP>TV }hMCT1N<pCOV>p rCO}p• N nn°ZT>I < Tw VMnv n N nn rnTN ffVMYCApPt Ni\{O! VNw 1N•N _ \aii nnlw O\hwNN2anwW{ PON1Vfw Tpf Op~TNTi ZN 00 ±0 n1mIVVA`{AH NlflinNiO aYf•TMOm~\i'l!V _A ~°niPNT~i O VftiNN •T f2rYCDnNM ~f NNi{mMN}I~j~fOir TC}ZG~MAN T VNSN• °VVL•O n rlry 1 >N• » p>•1 Vmrnp102Vm1 p N121rr VO° ~ fro AA~~N A~{wi YSiT.N~ p N ~ p AA c ~ n>mNS ~ IIi. NCC (m ilrmA ci y ian n'n mP V < r TV '}INII V A iiP VNO >O i{R<ii V iV i}w •~ 'N .MON !iV i f1 MN n V i1a ~ YnOh rP O i0>OTP V r OP N~ yANmT V uA n >0=0aA A it iVOMP!• f V Pn ~ mP V Im W NfNMJ e !`E u° a VYn_ r WO NN N !, N ! • < • n J~IVVVVrVJVNVVVJrV~VVVMVVVrVVVVVVVVVMrMMMVVVJVVVVVYV{ NMmPmumNOOOVY~yNN NNyNNNN NN yy11 Py~ NNNN N YY••NN VV••NN VV1r yy~~ yy~~ NV VP~P ~rP p~ PrP WN NYNNN'f.u111~l1il~} rOVmVPN~VNrOtlPrPN~VNnOiOVpNIWN•'OV<MPNIVN••OVOVPNfWNMr P V sWOVNN `ryrNNOVNPOPWNr lIMPNlYWOrOVnr••M VNMV••NNNN ! VOONOlIp NVP OMN! OOPONOOrVOPPOOVMN-IVPNONPO VOOIOPNV O••YVONOtlOPPW0000NNO00MWOnP00lOPVNOONOON OONIPOOOOOPUTrY^•4YiCOw'tVDDDDMODp60WOOVDOlOOWy00000! •i ~f ya •~ n T A ~ syT A OTr O~~ Iwn Ny: 1 Ni O ^ l3 NNW/VWWW V/••/N lJOIONVOOfIWPNNWWWfeVVOOOWIWNWNNONVOINYWtlVNYINO! OWONMOtlrtlOVWIV+~WNVVYtlNVVIOMONO/NSWNNNpNOpNWOMHOOY~vN ici:ii« <C=CAOMSCDOOOOiM3Smnn~)sY«COG~2 AmAA;aaaaA ra[AZOASSfONAFIAn°TCG• )u0 S)SZrnnry00nA<ryrN00 NPP<G NAOZN •Zn)OZmNN nnAniZfliT r) AA mrmm~• 04 mm•vm>iSmZmTO: AnASSn/A Np nmOmCPrNn N•wM~PA <rZZO vinm w+i SuON pA NNmmYrr >•TMymT C OP •A NnN<11 Z i p A N .••O ArM n N •OOAN)_npNGmu°M) _NNnm>nAN AnmeiNYOmi• ASZNTC nmr m• • gmZC zSCe mF1 Mr Zn +• T 1T3 )PA w rNNp o VNU> Zmn r> m rNNOnn• mM14TNAA+TfIA N+Nr++ °TCNO CS°r •m2Y2rZ lm Ir OmiAZAm pmN >'•mT rnOAAO O/v)<Oy0)A rpn>rOn• r ONGG 1+ T N mA rNM>N rri OZ=NrTA2 m9 GnZ nnN=H^t'~< iw n>My0> S TTUOn m n 2 V <•• SO A N T<) ° °NN n 20<NNA I+m> Nm.•00 nIZ A Nn m)N Ayn Nf mi++ 2c mi Z pT 0001« O yA m wm < _ POr NH !1 °N 4Y n N mti > yNm n~N m o°p Zm u N N O• C VT C N2S N O ~ • woo iw s < z. mz w c ~i :~ ~ :' • ) Ao r° r e z z~TaT Tmm°nz>c.i•ii.r.Amiu•N-:.N•s imioe~c°c~o:oiso~oi!°~c ~cN>i WC ae°mo Mw~~o:Tw>zzrm<~wm Ilz<Tmcz>wr>sTZwwrNwcNNTami•w xN>T cimzmlz+zmw~i~enms+eoreiniinc'~o NniitiizOrr~wrtlii m•iremr°N• ~i zepNAG~~rmP>iAS+rN Iri°imm oAiiei•°AIYmw~NmHn°in ii•N. limi W>. nwmNNOpimiTm«a~sYNSOAinACP <G yiTTNM N N«:rP y cz nas„m m eAm nm sp as n> Nxp_I ~lNNe l~~« <m4N AiTmNm•miNO~mNMNrWaC<y~2 mi°<N90Zm<SAOm>nNaP4mi• br O> mi <yi OeIOmOO NniNnnO <aNNAAOOm<SLAYO !N!O PrAAT OOmNNOWO/paT00 mON °• •• iA l0iw ilTiim>rTiC SOTPm~N< °OATA TTOWM I'SMVTrimr <WbA~TT•i•T N<P ri iiO<"xln •1 T>P`I oC AAN00 OpOOWOMmMO• A AMNMYC x NT fTrN flw\Zy WGINm 'TCMWN •N ONT>A • OSAO A\/NYNn 1 INN>Pm ONI\IOm/T •m\~ai r NZ NNOe 00 111T T:> OMNiO « nN NZ• M 00 OC N /i O mANOw C NAVOM iNi1 AcN••AT °NNr! r00 N crtlmNi W x A2Wi \« <WAS iTPbO OO nA Nf/•P! N fAYy00 PN=N M+°M WOwNr ~P~••«• T°Arf Ac • ~ r OCNI ibTN Oi ° °N mn r C> N ON• SA N OC n ON ND~N V~ NN m nm Nm/~An MN C ~ O > m Nx PN ! r \ N/2 AA OONN• n • O ~ < iN xPY OV iM_m\ Oi m ~a O! A! O •O V \~ N NO n0) N~0• O O N N! T pW i n\An f PN N YNAS O T n O A . a a aAb• • b P <e a an !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!1!!f!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!f!O VVNryyVVMMVVNVVppVRR•qqNPPrppVNNVMNNVVMNVVVJNVppNpVppN..ppNMPPVOV MppV~N~11NNVVVVV< ~~ojP'V Wwww~P•rNNNNMNNNp'•epi r•P•MYrP•n nrinoOS0000SSON~~N<aWW9 N••o }WNYONOMPNIWNYOfOJPN1WN/otlONPNPWNrOiOYPNIWN: N P !N NO PMrWNN NW:•/N M•• PYrPNO YNNOPONYNOPVINGVNtlO••PNPNNrWNNWNNOtlONON~WNVNOOOr•N•NbN NOOPOVPOOOW/OOVNWOPOlOWM0000lOOtlOeCrpOlY0000lNWOO ONN OOOWNO00wOONMNPVNOtlONOV~g4040N04eGpYV~GOGVVNOON .< :: •O ~f ii °~ n m •• i; v°r; Y 9wT YY AN •Y M oY °o °Is SY Zn y1G IAn ~ Nom; Ni I e O Y i ~ i Y Y 1i 1> YA ti •° A Z 1 O /y Nae o.~ N nor wzc O Y~1 am Rio eoi as mo uze 2Ji r0 TN L 41 ft r Cmm HBO :ff ~I f ~ emm ozs NJJ 000 bTT 00 NCC rr I OTT J^^• OYif~ Ym • A •Yf0 ~IJyt Y4F'" N. N,= N i O P i $6= I ~m ~f •O • fl io • .1 ~O 12 y T N O ~ ~~ 1 • Ol • IIT • ~ ~~ Yu ~ ~ • ; f1 T µ "r' e..o Tu11 Ay OOY OTi n ~Zf e~0 Nrn c NSJ: ON1 O = D /V n,mv nn n , vnr,~ nnn . v~r.rn . STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Hose, Deputy City Engineer ~~. . -, BY: Jeff Barnes. Maintenance Superintendent. Parka and Landscaping SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF TB8 ADVBRTISING TR6 "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" POR TBE LARDSCAPB AND IRRIGATION MAINTEtANCE COtfl'RACT POE LAIIDSCAPB MAINTBNANCE ASSEBSNSRI' DISTRICTS NO!®HtS 1 AND 5, TO BH POtII)ffi1 BY ACCOORT NOMBBRS 40-4I 30-6027, 60-4130-6028 AND 44-4130-6027, X4-4130-6028 RESPECTIVELY. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the specifications for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract foz Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts numbers 1 and 5, and approve the attached resolution authorising the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bida". Background/Analysis The subject specif icationa have been prepared and completed by staff and approved by the Deputy City Engineer and the City Attorney. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 11, 1990 and September 17, 1990, with the bid opening on Thursday September 27, 1990 at 2:00 p.m. Re/s/per/tfupl ly Subm ikked, .7 /2041 SB:JB:j6 Attachment /~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ (~ - 3 ~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING FLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NUMBERS 1 AND 5, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Numbers 1 and 5". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 7s hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals far doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the foliowing words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY G:7E~ Liiai. iiie said icy or wancno Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk 1n the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 27th day of September, 1990, sealed bids or proposals for the "Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Numbers 1 and 5" 1n said Ctty. Bids wail be opened and publicly read immediately in Lhe office of the City Clerk, 1500 Civic CenterOrive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Numbers 1 and 5". PREVAILING NAGE: Notice 15 hereby giver. that in accordance with the provisions of Caiifornia Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Amid es 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay no4 less Lhan the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character 1n the locality in which the public work is perforvmed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtlafe work. In that regard, the Dl rector of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California 1s required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per ~f1em wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on fiie 1n the office of the City L1erk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such deterwinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-flue dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general pravailirtg rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed 7n the prosecution of the work. Attention is dfrected to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in aRy apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship camaittee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade fora certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used Tn the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen Tn such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the .toint aporentlcechln ~umni Ltee nos exceeaea an average of 15 percent in the 90~dgys Drier to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C, When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship tralnfng on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is reg4l red to make contributions to funds establlshad f@r the adminiiirasion of apprenticeship programs tf he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen 1n any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and 1f other Contractors on the pubiic works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 1n the employment of apprentices. /8 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth 1n Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or methanlc employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (105) of the amount of Bald bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter Into the proposed contract 7f the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall became the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ,1 LIIC LI L] VI I,GIIV IIV VU4 U"NII1]O OIIOIU~ G11C LVII LI OLL W LIIC IICAL IV„C]L bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the tow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful Derformance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1003) of tfle contract price thereof, and an addlttonal bond to an amount equal to fifty percent (5tl'b) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materlais or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to 6e done under contract which maly be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga far the construction of said work. No proposal w/11 De considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. l9 The work 1s to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file 1n the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f50.00, said f50.06 1s nonrefundable. Upon written request by the btdder, copies of the plans and sDeciflcatlons will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of (25.00 to cover the cost of matling charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter Into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provtstons, as set forth 1n the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The CTty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reiect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Gated this ~ day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19 yor ATTEST: tY e ADYERTiSE ON September 11. 1990 September 17, 1990 as -- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT uATE: September 5, 1990 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer ~~. .... Jeff 9a: res, Haintenaace Superi rt erdent, Pa: ks ar.3 Landscaping S[1RJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ADVERTISING THH ^NOTICE INVITING HIDS^ P'OR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRZGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THE GB)1ERAL FOND AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSSSSMHNT DISTRICTS NOMBBIiS 3a AND 36, TO R6 FONDSD BY ACCOONT NOMBERS O1-4647-6028, 42-4130-6027, 42-4130-6028, 46-4130-6027 AND 46-4130-6028 RESPECTIVELY. Recommendation: Zt is recommended that the City Council approve the specifications for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for the General Fund and Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Numbers 3a and 3b, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". Background/Analysis Tha aih iart annrifiratinna haves Kenn nrwnar>A anA rnm_nlpt eA by staff and approved by the Deputy City Engineer and the City Attorney. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 11, 1990 and September 17, 1990, with the bid opening on Thursday, September 27, 1990 at 2:00 p.m. Rpe~spec~tfu~`nll-y,,SUbmitted, SB:JB:jb Attachment '", I RESOLUTION N0. 9Q - /30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NUMBERS 3a AND 3b", IN SA[D CTTY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TD ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and speciftcatlons presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for the General Fund and Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Nos. 3a and 3b". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of P.ancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on tha 27th day of September, 1990, sealed bids or proposals for the "Landscape and Irr:yai~on Maintenance Contract for the General Fund and Landscape Malntenar^e :+ssessment Districts Numbers 3a and 3b" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately Tn the office of the City Clerk, 1500 Civic CenterDrive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a fcrm provided for Lhe purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance i.OntPdCi ii,r 4.hP GPlleral Find anri t anA gr ape Mai rlena.^.Ce Assessment Districts Numbers 3a and 3b". PREVAILING WAGE: Netice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor 1s required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character to the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overttme work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has deteralned such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of Such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. the Contractor shad forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars if25.00) for each laborer, workman: or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefcre stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by aqy subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the wok. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprentlceable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship comalttee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate sill also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used to the performance of the contrect. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. Mhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee ha; exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that 7t 1s replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on ail of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,iaurnevmen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administratlon of apprenticeship programs 1f he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen 1n ary apprentlceable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such cantrlbuttons. ~3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Secttons 1777.5 and 2777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shalt constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division ?, part ?, Chapter I, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereTnbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said taborer, workman, er mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, ar bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (lOt) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such ronrrar• ea!g a-4 css6~~,'~ ~i~ei:ic, cernnea check, or bond shall becaae the property-of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1005) of the contract price thereof, and an addttional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (508) of the contract price for said work shah be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done Dy the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contras*.or will also be reauirwi to furnish a certificate That he carries compensation insurance covertn9 his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga far the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a Droposal form has not bean issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~~ Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. specifics tonslofttheeCity ofnRanchodCucamonga onefilefinethepOfficeaof the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 550.00, said 550.00 is ncnrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and speclficatlons will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nanreimbursable payment of 525,00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth 1n the Plans and speclficatlons regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. n"~~ .wi. E;~ ~ iy PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this dyv of lg , Mayor ATTEST: ty e ADVERTISE ON September 11, 1990 September 17 1990 J l~TTV Ai.P T .. ~. ~~~. ~. .. ........ v.. v,. STAFF REPORT ~ ~`~ DATE: September 5, 1990 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Jeff Barnes, Maintenance Superfntendenk, Parks and Landscaping SUBJECT: APPROVAL OP THE ADVERTISING TBE "NOTICE INVITING RIDS" POR THE LAMDSCAPB AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NOMBHRS 2 AND 1, TO 1!6 PDNDBD BY ACCOONT NOMBERS 41-4130-6027, I1-4130-6028, 43-4130-6027 and 43-4130-6028 RESPECTIVELY. Recommendation: It is recommended that the C1ty Council approve the specifications Eor the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts numbers 2 and 4, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". Background/Analysis The subject specifications have been oreoared and cmm~teteA h" start and approved by the Deputy City Engineer and the City Attorney. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 11, 1990 and September 17, 1990, with the bid opening on Thursday September 27, 1990 at 2:00 p.m. Respectf ull~y Soubmitted, ruV~ SB:JB:jb Attachment ~b RESOLUTION N0. ~D -jJ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NUMDERS 2 AND 4", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS NHEREAS, it 7s the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain i~proveauants In the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for Lhe construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract far Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Numbers 2 and 4". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 1s hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt cf sealed olds or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially Tn the following words and figures, to w1 t: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIOS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY uivcn cnac me said City or Nancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of Lhe City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 27th day of September 1990, sealed bids or proposals for the "Landscape and irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Numbers 2 and 4" in said City. Bids will be opened and pu611c1y read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 1500 Civic CenterDrive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for Lhe purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts Numbers 2 and 4". PREVAILING WAGE: Notleg is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of Caiifiornia Labor Code, 0l vision 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor 1s required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character 1n the locality 1n which the puD11c work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, Lhe Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California fs required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per thew wages are on file in the a~ office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamwnga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25,00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Co9e as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or arty subcontractor under hi ~. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprentlceable occupation tp apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which adalnisters the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the perforwiance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen 1n such cases shad not be less then one to five except: A. Nhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship ~ua.nitiee nos exceeded an average or to percent in the 'lU days prior to the request for certificate, or D. Nhen the number of apprentices in training 1n the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Nhen the trade can show that 1t is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or 1 ocal ly, or J. Nhen the Contractor provides evidence that he mploys registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make con;ribUtfons to funds esta611shed for the ada;intstration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen 1n any apprentlceable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. ~O The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Infor+nation relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements mdy be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight 18) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for alt workmen employed Tn the execution of this contract arrd the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shalt forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-flue dollars (S2'S.00) far each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed to the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence paiy to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence pa~yrnents are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, pAyable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of Lhe amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the "Y~ ~~ nu„~iN Cu~amuuya co the airrerence oeLMeen the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if arOr, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50i) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure Lhe payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will a15o be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering h15 employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered fran a Contractor whom a proposal ferry has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) 1n accorlance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and reguiattons adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract 1s awarded. The work is to be done 1n accordance with the profiles, plans, and a~ specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10506 Ctvic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 50.00, said 50.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request 1s accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of E25.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to re,iect any and ail bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ 4ay of 19 PASSED ANp ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, this day of 19 yor ATTEST: ty e ADVERTISE ON September il, 1990 September 17, 1996 3d STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 (~ T0: City Council and City Manager v FROM: Shtntu Bose, Deputy Gtty Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Norks Engineer SUBJECT: Ret ect aii bids for the Base Line Median, Phase I, located I from Haven Avenue to Valencia Street RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council retect all bids, without pretudtce, far the Base Line Medtan, Phase I, as being non-responsive to the needs of the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Pursuant to previous Councll action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 21, 1990. Staff has reviewed the bids and found several arithmetic errors. Also, the bids received exceed the engineer's estimate by a substantial amount as follows: Engineer's Estimate 5189,616.75 Annarant lnv bid 5936.d39 .00 Apparent low bid with corrections 5274,859.60 Apparent second bid 5387,439.00 Therefore, 1t 1s recommended that all bids be retested. Staff will be requesting authorization to readvertise at a later date after reviewing the budget to determine 1f this protect can be readvertised as is. Res'p/ectf/ul l yQsu~bm~l Lted, ,~1~Yn /~ SB:W:d1w Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: Mayor, Members of City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director BY: Kathy Sorensen, CLP, Recreation Superintendent e~ , SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEES RECOMSENDATI0~7 The Park and Recreation Commission and staff recommend the approval of the following ad hoc advisory committees for the Park and Recreation Commission: • Teen Recreation Activity Committee • Senior Adult Program Committee • Bilingual Program Committee • Sports Advisory Committee BACRGRODND Recently Community Rnnii ..oq n~.._rtWC. t .. ,,.,Liiieu oy Administration that these currently existing committees were not formally recognized by City Council as specially- chartered advisory committees to the commission. staff desires to legitimize these ad hoc committees. ANALYSIS Over the past several years staff has organized ad hoc advisory committees to provide input regarding program areas which directly affect services provided by the Community Services Department. These committees can provide the Commiasiw~, with the ability to review items of concern or to weak citizen input on an as-needed basis. The Park and Recreation Commiaeion recemm¢rds that staff coordinate t..*.e cGiuiuittees, Tne following process will be used to fill the committees. 1. Advertise committees and have interested citizens of Rancho Cucamonga fill out applications. 2. Applications reviewed by Park and Recreation Commiaeion and make recommendation to City Council. 3. City Council appoints committee members. 3~ Ad Hoc Advisory Committees September 5, 1990 Pages 2 These ad hoc advisory committees are: Teen Recreation Activity Committee (T.R.A.C1: To advise staff on program ideas, iasuea regarding teenagers and to provide actual assistance in offering the activity. Committee made up of five students and one adult advisor Prom each junior/middle school and high school and recommended representatives of Rancho Cucamonga youth service organizations. Term of committee is ones year, September through August. Senior Adult Proaran Comsittee• Frovides information, input, activity ideas and brain storming regarding senior adult programs and issues. It would bs staff's suggestion to have the number limited to t e (i5). Term of committee is one year, January through December. Bilingual ProrTram Coatttee• Provides information, input and activity ideas regarding the outreach and inclusion oY non- english speaking residents. Currently, the primary focus has been on the Spanish-speaking community. Currently twenty people, a cross section of residents and business people, make up the committee. This committee has been in existence for only Pive months. If it is to continue, a committee of ten would be suggested. Term of committee is nne von r. .Tn min rv 1~hrn....f. nn..n..s...,- S~orta Advieorv Com(ttea• Currently this group is better known as the Youth Sport Advisory Council; however, there is definite need for including adults on the committee. Currently each organization has a representative on the committee appointed by their respective organization. It is staff's thought to add one representative per league offered by the City to also sit on the board. Therefore, more input coulfl ba provided by adult softball and youth basketball. City-sponsored leagues would have one representative and one alternate per league. The president or designee oP local sports organizations would be classified ae the official representative to the committee. Term of committee is one year, January through December. Respectfully submitted, ll//,1/ _ Jo9JSChultz, CLP Community Services Director KS/kls c~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DRTE: September 5, 1990 GUGMO ~''~ ~~. r 0 :J_ ~_ D 19ii --~ TO: City Council FRGM: Debra Adams, City Clerk/Records Manager BY: Tony Russell, Records Clerk SUBJECT: DBBTRDCTION OF CITY DOCOX.8t7T6 It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form. Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approved by the city attorney and city council. Also under the same Government Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/tr attachment 3 `f RESOLL'TI ON N0. 90-~*~ 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ', HE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS ANO OOCUME NTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROV IOEO UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records under the charge of the foiiowing Ciiy Oeparimenis are no lchger required for publie o. private purposes: BL'ILOING & SAFETY WHEREAS, it has been determined that destrut tion cf the above- mentioned materials is necessary to conserve storage space, and reduce staff time, expense, and confusion in handling, and informing the public; and WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California authorizes the head of a City department to destroy any City records and documents which are over two years old under his or her charge, without making a copy thereof, after the same are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy szid records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, in storage, without making a copy thereof, which are over two years old; and WHEREAS, said records have been appro veo rot des uruc Liun uy Lii~ CI.y Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, this City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION :: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2: That the City Clerk is authorized td allow examination by and donation to the Department of Special Collections of the University Research Library, University of California, or other historical society designated by the City Council, any of the records described in Exhibit "A" attar hed hereto and made a part hereof, except those deemed to be Conti de ntrai, SECTION 3; That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption pf this resolution, and t enceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect, 3S DEPAA'IaENT BUILDING & SAFETY PHEi'ARED SY/DATE TONY RUSSELLl8-6-90 AETEaxioa 2 Years SHELF ao. RECORCS CENTER TITLE oP aoxi DESCRIPTION OP CONTENTSs 1985-fl7 Sul ldlna P'-ars 10900 4TH .1601 DAYTON 1171: ARROW 9360&'9340 BASELINE 3355 JERSEY 30 •'O1 CIVIC CENTER 6331 UTICA 9974 39TE '_0727 7TH 95oe BASELINE 9116 FOOTHILL 4075 BASELINE 9460 LUCAS RANCH RD 9320 RYOSSP 9375 ARCRIHALD 8463 :iAVEN 9140 HAVEN 9421 FOOTHILL 7247 ARCHIBALD 9170 HAVEN e Feu t9'rY. :0276 FOOTHILL 7297 ARCRIHALD 10350 COMMERCE CENTER 11200 ARROW 9679 BASELINE 8960 TORONTO 84:.1 HAVEN 8651 MADRONE 10350 ,70&90 COMMERCE CENTEE 1C955 ARROW 8860 VINCENT 10404 6TH 9120 HAVEN 10670 6TH 10727 -30767 7T:: 3:266 JERSEY 9156- ARCHIBALD 10723 JERSEY '9566, 76&66 FERON 30600 4TH 6351 HAVEN 1OB07 JERSEY 8865 UTICA 9439 7ERSEY 6401 HAVEN 9121 EAVEN 7966 HAVP.N POA DE6TADCTIOS SYS EESOLDTIOa aO. 071T8 DESTROYED AaDx AACantEEl. gssfi/. C1ty Atltorney 10380 FOOTHILL 9944 HIGHLAND 2730 SPRUCE 10987 TERRA VISTA 8960 TORONTO 10535 FOOTHILL 10428 FOOTHILL 8897 VINCENT 11000 JERSEY 10470 FOOTHILL 8651 MADRONE 9292 FOOTHILL 11200 ARROW 7968 HAVEN 9140 HAVEN 6321,31&71 HAVEN 30900 4TH 10900 FOOTHILL 9713 VICTORIA 10555 LEMON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ., DATE: September 5, 1990 (~ T0: City Council and City Manager L~ FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Contract C1vi1 Engineer ~ SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 11286 and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, 600 feet north of Church Street, submitted by Lewis Development Company ~ RECONEImI1TI0N It is recommended that the City Council adopt Lhe attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 11286 and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, and 4, and authorizing the the City Clerk to cause samle to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Parcel Map 11286 was approved by the Planning Ctx~missian on April 26, 1989, for the division of 12 acres of land Tnto 3 parcels in the Terra Yista Planned GOmmUnl Ly, IOCated on Ln! east sloe or mill lxen avenue, evil Teel IlOrco Vr Church Street. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file to the City Clerk's office. Respectf//ull/pyJ submitted, ~:~,/-~ /d'~~^ SB:LEH:JM:diw Attachments 3~' RESOLUTl ON N0. C~ p _ 3(F I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP N0. 11286 (TENTATIVE PARCEL WIP N0. 11286) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 11266, submitted by Lewis Oevet opment Company, Subdivider, and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, 600 feet north of Church Street, being a division of 13.65 acres was approved by the Planning Cam~tssion on April 26, 1989, as provided 1n the State Subdivision Map Act and is Tn coagllance alth the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said Ctty; and MHEREAS, Parcel Map Na. 11286 1s the Final Map of the division of land approved as sham on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said F1na1 Map offering for dedication for public use the streets detlneated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE I7 RESOLYEO by the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers far dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk Ts authorized to execute the certifteate thereon behalf of said Ct;y; and ~ TAaf e_AA D....1 ~~_ v. _ hereby approved and rthe City~Englneervls~authorized to present same to Lhe Ceunty Recorder to be fit ed for record. ~~-~ 39 RESOLUTION N0. q ~ - 3 y ~.• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL MAP 11286 WHEREAS, the Cityy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time tfie City Council is desirous to take proceedinps to annex Lhe property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by th15 referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Ur Nnn~nu GuCi,i;iriiun HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOMS: SECTION I: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper y as shown 1n Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including~Efie-Tevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to Lhe territory annexed hereunder. ~. ~;- ~D •A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM , LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGNTMtG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO R ~M ~iaa~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA EIg1IBIT 'B' PROJECT NIU£: PARCEL MAP 11286 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: pcl 1: .368 - (City property) 0. unit pcl 2: 6.695 - (Milliken Park Site) 13.39 units pcl 3: 4.750 - (YMCA) 9.50 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. 5800E 950DC I6;OIID 'LZ,IIG77~-??;50tf 1 --- --- 6 --- --- 4 --- --- --- --- --- fANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Camountty Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Name Equest.Trail Sq. ft• Sg. ft. Ea. n JM:9/5/90 y~- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 (7 T0: City Council and City Manager ~J FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Contract Ci vii Engineer SuBJ ECT: Approval of Parcel Map 12596 and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Main*,enance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6 for Parcel Map 12596, located at the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by OAS Investors It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 12596 and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the City Clerk t0 cause save to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 1259b was approved by Lhe Planning Commission on November 29, 1989, for the division of 9.52 acres of land into 4 Darcels, located at the northeast corner of Yineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The Consent and Naiver to Mnexatlon form stgned by the Developer is on file 1n the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, SB:LEH:sd Attachments y3 RESOLUTION N0. y(~ - 3f~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 12596 (TENTATIYE PARCEL MAP N0. 12596) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 12596, submitted by OAS Investors and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, being a division of 9.52 acres, was approved by the Planning Cae~aission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 29, 1989; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map kumber 12596 is the final map of the division cf land approved as shown an said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said Ctty have now been met. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCNO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map Number 12596 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer 1s authorized to present same to the County Recorder Lo be filed for record. v !~ yy RESOLUTION N0. 90 _~(/~[ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION DF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12596 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaawnga, California, has previously fonaed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972°, Deing Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"l; and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, a17 of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". !:.°..', Tu~niivnc, TiiE bllr 6WNG1L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the Tevy of all assessments, shall bu applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~~ ys ASSESS~t1ENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAl1AONGA ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN ~M 12396 t STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: PARCEL MAP 12596 N0. OF O.U. OR ACREAGE: 9.52 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 19.04 units pcl 1; 1.26 pcl 2: 1.97 pcl 3: .98 pcl 4: 5.31 g3i acres STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1 6 No. of La s to be Annexed T~9000-~56OL 1~~-T1;If~5D0- --- --- 13 --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Coacmnity Turf District Na. Street Nave Equest.Trail Sq• ft. 3 Foothill Blvd. --- --- Vineyard Ave. --- --- San Bernardino Rd. --- --- JAA: 9/5/90 Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. Ea. --- 8 --- 10 --- 13 ~~ CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 5, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shictu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Contract Civ11 Engineer e~3 SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 12781, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 for 6, located at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted 6y Stenton Jersey Partners RECOMMEMDI1T10N It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 12781 and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, and 6, and authorizing the the City Clerk to cause same to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Parcel Map 12781 was approved by the Planning Coimnlsslon on March 28, 1990, for the division of 9.57 acres of land Into 3 parcels 1n the Minimum Impact Noavv inAncrrlal Di crrirt. lerafoA af. tha muthwoct corner nF .lercev Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. The Consent and Nalver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Cierk's office. Re~sp~ectf/ully submitted, ItTO1' SB:LEH:JM:dlw Attachments y8 RESOLUTION N0. 90 ~3 (/,j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP N0. 12781, (TENTATIVE PARCEL IMP N0. 12781) MHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 12781, submitted by Stenton Jersey Partners, Subdivider, and consisting of 3 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, being a division of 9.57 acres was approves by the Planning Commission on March 28, i990 as Drovided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and MHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 12781 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and MHEREAS, Lo meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers for dedication and Lhe Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certtflcate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Mao No. 12781 be and the same is hereby approved and Lhe City Engineer is authorized to Dresent same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ~9 RESOLUTION N0. Gj ~ , 3 (~ (p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AN6 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AY.D 6 FOR PARCEL MP- 12781 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 {hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Dtstrlct; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous t0 take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Incorporated Herein by this referenced t0 the Maintenance Dtstrlct; and WHEREAS, ail of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown 1n Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described 1n Exhlbtt "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance Dtstrlct. SECTION 3: That ali future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including die ~TeT of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~ r i , , ~~ ~-/'~~~~ 5d EXIN&T •A' ASSESSMENT DIADRAM LANDSCAPE MANTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGFITMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 O ~ n -i = O N TZ ~ ~ ~ q: .. q u o v"pn ..... r.. ~ , r nrm C .-~, _ ___- - wn '+~ ;"~ PARGEL + ~/1 .,.. D RGEL1'. --- ;I IL' i i.. I ~ ~....., ~ ~ ...y... -- L 6(0 ~ ° c r •~ an n6~d ' i ~ ~ .,,,.,,, ' 'j CITY OF RANCwlO CUCAMONaA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO +~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~ fig/ EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: N0. OF O.U. OR ACREAGE: 9.57 acres pcl 1; 2.7 2: 2.2 3: 3.0 T.9' net acres PARCEL MAP 12781 N0. OF ASSESS, UNIT: 19.14 units STREET LIGNTiNO MAINTENANCE OISTRlC? No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. b60Dr--95 '12;iSDlf --27,56 1 --- --- --' --- --- 5 --- --- --- -'- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Caaeuni ty Turf Ground Cover District No. Street Nave Equest.Tra11 Sq• ft• Sg. 9t. 3 --- --' --- --' (Work program areas annexed with DR 87-56) JAA:9/5/90 S~ Trees Ea. nrmv no o a winvn nnn . vr:..n . STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 (~ T0: City Council and City Manager v FROM: Shintu Base, Deputy City Engineer 9Y: Paul A. Rougeau, City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement for the preparation of traffic signal coordination timing plans for Foothill Boulevard to Herman Kinmel and Associates RECOMIENDATION: It is reconmended that a contract be awarded to and a Professional Services Agreement be executed with Hermmn Kimmel and Associates of Newport Beach, California for the preparation of traffic signal coordination timing plans for Foothill Boulevard in the amount of 514,905 (f 13, 550 plus lOS contingency) to be funded from Redevelopment Account No. 16-50300. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fiscal year 1990-91 includes the preparation of coordination timing plans and the purchase of related equipment for Foothill Boulevard. These timing plans will provide coordinatec; traffic signal timing for both present and future traffic signals along Foothill Boulevard (State Route 66.) The Newport Beach consulting firm, Herman Kimmel and Associates, were asked to prepare a proposal for the Liming plan portion of the work as they are a recognized and dependable traffit signal design firm with experience in Rancho Cucamonga. Their proposal was reviewed and ,lodged to adequately address the issues and requirements as presented to them. The fee estimate for each portion of the work was determined to be 1n line with fees currently being offered for similar types and quantities cf work. They have supplied the required Certificate of Insurance in or exceeding the amounts prescribed and have submitted the agreement as executed by then. Nith the above 1n mind and the fact that staff has personal confidence in their ability and desire to complete the protect in a timely and profe.;sionat manner, Herman Kimmel and Associates is hereby recommended to receive Lhe dMard Of thn nrnixf and that tha Gmfngcienal 5nryirog Bgrean,,n.^.t be °Xi'LL'~°d. Respectfully submitted, ~„~, ~u SB:PR:JTH:d1w Attachment 53 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DRTE: September 5, 1990 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Paul 4. Rpugeau, City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: gpproval to award and execute a Prnfes5innal Sew ices Agreement for the preoara Lion of traffic signal coortl ination timing plans for Foothill Boulevard to Herman Kimmel antl Associates RECOMMENDATIDN It is recommended that a contract 6e awarded to and a Professional Services Agreement 6e executed with Herman Kimmel and Associates pt Newport Beach, California for the preparation of traffic signal coordination timing plans for Foothill Boulevard in the amount of 814,905 (413,550 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Redevelop- ment Account No. 16^50300. BACKGROUND/ANRLVSIS The Capital Improvement Frogram (CIP) for fiscal year 1990-91 inclutles the preparation of coordination timing plans and the purcnase of related equipment far Foothill Boulevard. These timing plans will provide coordinated traffic Signal timing for both present and future traffic Signals along Foothill Boulevard (State The Newport Beach consulting firm, Herman Kimmel and A=_scciates, were asked to prepare a proposal for the timing plan portion of the work as they are a recognized and dependable traffic signal tlesign firm with experience in Fancho Cucamonga. Their proposal was reviewed and Judged to adequately address the issues and require- ments as presented to them. The fee estimate for each potion of the work was determined to be in line with tees currently being offered far similar types antl quantities of work. They have supplietl the required Certificate of Insurance in or exceeding the amounts prescribed and have submitted the agreement as executed by them. 4!1 t.^. the aCe•:~ ... ..~a~ ,~.. Ohre -- a~ iiii han personal confidence in their ability^and desire~to complete the pralect in a timely and professional manner, Herman Kimmel and Associates is hereby recommended to receive the award of the project and that the Professional Services Agreement be executed. Respectfully submitked, sf CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: C1 ty Council and City Manager FROM: Shtntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Millie Yalbuena, Assistant Engineer a~3 SUB.'.ECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.s and Street Lightfng Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 88-46, located at the southwest corner of Base line Road and Hellman Avenue submitted by Parkplace Cucamonga Reca~lmArioN It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving CUP 88-46, accepting the sub,{ect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign Bald agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGRWND CUP 88-46, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Rcad and Hellman Avenue, in the Neighborhood Commercial District, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 26, 1989 for the division of 3.5 acres into 1 lot. The Developer, Parkplace Cucamonga, is submitting an agreement and security Lo guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: (231,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5115,650.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Nater District. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer 1s on file in the City Clerk's office. Resp/actf/ully submitted. ~/~ SB:L+V:JAA:diw Attachments SS RESOLUTION N0. G~ ~ - J7Cr A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 88-46 NHEAEAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on September 5, 1990, by Parkplace Cucamonga as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ayacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,~ect to the terms thereof, 1s to be done Tn conJunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Comalssion, Conditional Use Permit No. 68-46; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufflctent Improvement Security, which 15 identified in said Improvement Agreement. NQI, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCHO CUCAMON6A, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby aDDroved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the f.1tY of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. s~ RESOLUTION N0. / ~ _~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUD 88-46 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Dtvisfon 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Llghttng Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance OTstrlct"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Llghttng Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Dl strict; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council Ts desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". nUw, IntNGr UNt, IHC GL IT GWNGIL W IHt G11Y OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are alt true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the prope~y as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described to Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including ~ieTevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~ ~~ v ~ I 57 EXMb1T 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE iiAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 ~~ ___ .E%'iST. _SIpEWaLx1___EXISTIHG C 10000' .~ PARCEL ~ EXIT i. a.c. ~. i i PIYI.S. Uzi iPEES ~~ x. sr era AVE. _ _ ~ __ EXIST, f!OFWaIx ~` _j v _. _.\ ~ \^~1 •.C. 11115 e :« 1 gI' PARCEL ~dli i 1 I1 I ~ I ~~ ^' W ~~: ~ Z PGS. J4 li 35 e ' SEX IST, iPFES ~ 1 ~I r ~.I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONa~A COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD~INO STATE OF CALIFORNIA caP ae-a6 EXHIBIT 'B' PRQIECT NAME: CUP-88-46 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 3.5 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 7 units STREET LIGHTING IANINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lam s to be Annexed District No. ~ i _~^ ~_ I -" 2 --- --- --- 6 1 --' --- -__ _-- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Coaanunlty Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Name Eguest.Tra11 Sg• ft. Sg. ft. Ea. 3 Base Ltne 8 ~ --- --- --- 29 Hellman Ave, --- --- --- --- JAA/9-5-90 59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy C1 ty Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Contract Civil Engineer e~3 . SIIR,lEC7: Approval of ?:nprovenx:nt Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 87-56, located on the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Stanton Jersey Partners, a California Limited Partnership RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving OR 87-56, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND DR 87-56, located on the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester ...__.._ ~~ ` ."ii unum Inrya~i heavy Indus friar UeYel epmeni U15tr7C t, Was approved~byythe Planning Commission on July 13, 1988 for the development of 7.8 acres of land. The Developer, Stanton Jersey Partners, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5904,000 labor and Material Band: 5452,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available to Lhe Ctty Clerk's Office Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Nater District The Can sent and waiver io Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfullypsubmitted, D SB:LEN:JAA:dIw ~P`-i RESOLUTION N0. ~D ' 31F / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REYIE~i N0. 87-56 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on August I5, 1990, by Stanton Jersey Partners as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-wa,y adjacent to the real property specifically described thereto, and generally located southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described Tn sa!d Improvement Agreement and subject to the ternis thereof, is to be done 1n conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Ptanning Camnisslon, Development Review No. 87-56; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified 1n said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL t!F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOi1G.A, HEREBY RESOLVES thet said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby aDProved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~I RESOLUTION N0. G~d _ 3S~ A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCSI. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 87-56 WHE REgS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting P.!:t of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Dl strict; and WHEREAS, at this time the Gity Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within Lhe territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report`. NOW, THEREFORE, 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper y as shown 1n Exhlbtt "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, Including-f~Tevy of ail assessalents, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~~F~" ~~ ~ ~ ~~ IiXINBIT •q• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 N D Z v Ir ~ 4•I~ \' `- ++ ~I 6!p i I I '... Ji aL.: '_ ~ Y 9 Y' ....: Id - /ns u ~ PAitGEL PA P RCEL I' _.._ P T ~ -..-.a~• ._ I ~ 124'I.IY - i ~'A r;u M161.i • v : .; i:v as .,..,... ~•.~.~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA O r 2 rn -I ' m ~ ~. r ~~ ~~ l A , r 4,~ ~ F'\ .I ~,~~._ 11 Gi~I !411 ~-- COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1~R 87 5~ EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: DR 87-56 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 7.8 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 15.6 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of L s to be Annexed District No. ~_ ./~ i __- 3 --- --- --- 6 --- 16 --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Camwntty Turf District No. Street Nave Eguest.Tra11 Sg. ft. 3 Boston P1. --- --- Jersey Blvd. --- --- nG~nm del' nre. ^-- --- JAA:9/5/90 Ground Cover Trees Sg. ft. Ea. --- 8 --- 32 --- 11 7 nrmv nn n w wrn rrn nr,n • e.r n...n . STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II SUBJECT: Release of Sewer and Water Bonds for Tract 13565 located on the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road It 1s recommended the City Council authorize Lhe release of two Faithful Performance Bonds 1n the amounts of 5333,000 and f491,500. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13565, located at the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road 15 being developed by Standard Pacific Development. The County of San Bernardino accepted agreements and bonds for the sewer and water systems on September 28, 1988. The protect was transfered to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on Navember• 1, 1989. construction of sewer and water systems with 6onds.~ However,~ysinee the City Council accepted the transfer of this protect as a whole, it is recommended that City Council authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amounts of §333,000 and §491,500. Cucamonga County Water District is, in fact, holding bonds in the same amount to guarantee performance. OEYELOPER: Standard Pacific of Orange County 1565 W. MacArthur Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626 SEWER WATER Release: Faithful Perfornance Bond §333,000 §491,506 Respect/rutly submitted, d~-I~ SB:SG:dlw V J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT >. DATE: September 5, 1990 n T0: City Council and City Manager v FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector jI~ SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13650 located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Street The required street improvements for Tract 13650 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond 1n the amount of 521,907 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond to the amount of 5219,079. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13650 -located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Street. DEVELOPER: Northwood 1678 Nest Arrow Route N141 Upland, CA 91786 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 521,907 Release: Faithful Perfornance Bond (Street) 5219,079 Respectfully submitted, SB:SMG:diw Attachment (~ RESOLUTION N0. CJO ~ 35/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ALCEDTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEPENTS FOR TRACT 13650 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13650 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NNEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 1s authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~-. iP ORDINANCE N0. 425 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING PUBLIC ENTRY AND OCCUPANCY OF POSTED CITY PROPERTY NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition of a new Chapter 9.20 to read, in words and figures as follows: "Chapter 9.20 "ENTRY AND OCCUPANCY OF POSTED CITY PROPERTY "Section 9.20.010 - No person other than a peace officer, City employee acting within the course and scope of employment, or other person having express permission of a duly authorized Ciiy employee, shall enter or remain upon, or fail or refuse to leave upon a City employee's request, any City-owned property not open to Lhe public, provided such property has keen posted with a sign or sings in plain sight at entrances to such property. Such signs shall be readable from nut less than Ywe my-five (2B) feat and shall ;ta te: 'CLOSED TO PUBLIC -- VIOLATORS SUBJECT TO ARREST'. "Sec tlOn 9.20.020 - It shall ho unlawful fur any r.ercnn to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the require- ments of this Chapter. Any person violating any provision of this Chapter or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One-Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, m^ by both such fine and imprisonment. Each person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of the provisions of this Cha oter is committed, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Chapter." SECTION 2: The City Council declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or words of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action is a court of competent iuricd irtinn, nr by .____„ of lCq•sla t' `he ~-oiii'- - IIV provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences ,r and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published fn the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. G ~~~ •.ta a yr nna~a.nv vva. nivavi,vrv STAFF REPORT '~ DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ET INANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-Oi - CITY OF RRNC HO CUCfUAONGA - An amendment to the Etiwa nda Specific Plan pertaining to the proposed removal of existing Eucalyptus windrows as a result of the alignment of Summit Avenue west of Et iwa nda Avenue and other street alignments. RECOMMENDATION: Based on previous Council direction, staff recommends approval of Etiwa nda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01, as mod ificd, and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. If the City Council concurs, adapt ion of the attached ordinance would be appropriate. Staff will also need direction as to the Liming of replacement plantings. BACKGROUND/COUNCIL DIRECTION: On August th, 199U, me i,i ay Cuwail ~w1 J. their first hearing on the proposed amendment to the specific plan, which consisted of two items. First, the amendment proposed removal of a eucalyptus windrow identified far preservation by the specific plan, Second, the amendment proposed modification to the text of the specific plan allowing Planning Commission approval of tree removal requests without further amendments to the specific plan. In regard to the Dro posed removal of the protected windrow, the Counr.il directed staff to re-examine available options, to determine whether the tree removal is truly necessary. The Council also requested staff to examine the feasibility of replacement plantings to 6e installed at the time of removal, in rvgar u'S to the secand part of the amendment, dealing with potential future removals of protected windrows in ttiwa nda, the Cou ncii ir~d lca ted its desire to retain final approval authority. Staff has modified the proposed amendment accordingly. This means that future requests far removal of protected windrows in Et iwa nda ias shown in Figure 5-13) will continue Lo require City Council approval. ~9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESPA 90-0'. - CITY OF RANCHO CUC,AMONGA September 5, !990 Page 2 The following sections of this report focus on the two remaining questions raised by the City Council; i.e., is the removal of this windrow necessary, and if so, what is the feasibility of immediate replacement. Street Design and Al ianment: This section of Summit Avenue is an integral component of the crty-wide circulation system. Summit Avenue o;ill eventually extend to the west to connect to Banyan Street. When cumpl ete, the Su- it/9anyar align^ent is pl a.^..^.ed t,. serpo ac a continuous east-west collector (please see Exhibit "A"1. With the fate of the County-controlled areas to the north uncertain, this may he the only continuous east-west collector street north of the Route 30 corridor. As such, the Summit/Ba nyan collector is an extremely important element of the overall circulation system. City standards for collector streets require a minimum pavement width of 44 feet. This accommodates one lane of traffic plus a parking lane 'n each direction (Exhibit "B"~. However, the Etiwanda Specific Plan calls for this segment of Summit Avenue to have a pavement width of only 36 feet. This was done on purpose to preserve as many of the existing trees as possible. In addition, the centerline of Summit Avenue was shifted slightly to the north, for the same reason (Exhibit "B"~. This special design allowed the preservation of the existing windrows on Summit Avenue east of Etiwanda Avenue. It will also allow the retention of Lhe existing windrow west of Etf wa nda, in this section of Summit Avenue. However, where Summit curves to the south to avoid existing structures on the north, there is no way Lo protect the existing trees Witnout rUrtner reduc my iiir, pa veineni, wl~ili. It is the Traffic Engineer's opinion that the already reduced 36 foot width is the minimum pavement width possible for the street to function safely and as intended. To summarize, staff concluded the following: 1. This section of Summit Avenue will eventually be a necessary part of the overall cirtulat ion system. 2. There are no viable alternatives to the proposed alignment. 3. The proposed pavement width of 36 feet is the minimum necessary to accommodate traffic volumes associated with collet for >ireeii. 4. Where the street swings to the south to avoid existing structures, there will be approximately 425 feet of windrow which will require removal in its entirety. This segment contains approximately 70 trees. 7~ CITY CCUNC IL STAFF REPORT ES PA 90-0'. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GR September 5, 1990 Page 3 5. Elsewhere in this section of Summit Avenue, 36 additional trees located within 5 feet of curb will also require removal. However, there will be approzima tely 203 trees remaining, retaining the continuous windrow as required by the Et iwanda Specific Plan. Exhibits "C-! to C-8" illustrate the specific locations. Tree Replacement and Ma iniena nce: ibe 'ctiwa nda Spx if is Plan re qo ires the planting of replacement windrows where existing windrows are removed as a result of new development. The plan contains specific provisions for planting and maintenance of new trees associated with each new project. Typically, the establishment and interim maintenance of these new windrows becomes the responsibility of the developer. Once all improvements, including trees, are accepted by the City, landscape maintenance of directly adjacent pa rkway5 becomes the responsibfl ity of the City. landscape maintenance districts are set up to fund the cost of such maintenance. However, this cast, is not typical. This section of Summit Avenue is not directly adjacent to any development; the construction of the roadway is required of the deveioper to assure two points of access to the subdivision located west of this segment. The use of an assessment district to pay for the maintenance of parkways NOT adjacent to the deve?opment he i.^.g assessed would he inconsistent with Oast policy. As an alternative to an assessment district, Lhe City has the ability to accent the maintenance of the replacement plantings through its general maintenance program, i.e. the gene tai tuna. nccuru my ~~ ~~~ maintenance staff, the cost of such maintenance would be about E6-]0 per tree per year initially. After five years, the cost of maintenance would average about b30 per Lree per year. Assuming 53 replacement trees (only that section of windrow totally removedl, Lh is would mean a general fund cost of about b500 per year initially, and about bt ,590 per year after five years. Eventually, when adjacent properties develop, these trees would be included in a landscape maintenance district. Staff has no way of knowing when this might take place. Available Oot ions: Based on the information presented, staff believes the modified amendment minimizes the length of windrow necessary for removal, approximately 425 feet. iF it _ Thn fni~nr il'S desire to re qU ire reDldCemenL trees a5 a Condition of Approval for a iree Removal "term it, t'ne fuiiur.'ing options are available: A. Defer replacement of the windrow until such time as properties adjacent to Summit Avenue develop. with maintenance through an assessment district established at the time of new development, or 7~ CtTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ENS PA 90-0] - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 5, 1990 Page 4 B. Require timely replacement of the 425-foot section in accordance with the Etiwa nda Specific Plan (approximately 53 trees, 8 feet on center). Ma in to name to be absorbed into the general mafntena nce program. The developer is to be responsible for maintenance during the establishment period, or approx ima to ly 2 years. Staff is seeking City Council direction on this issue. Res pg ly su bm'tted, Br 1e City anner BB :OK/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Summit/Ba nyan Alignment Exhibit "B" - Street Ser_tf ons Exhibit "C" - Tree Removal Plan Figure 5-13 - Street Tree Preservation Ordinance, as amended 7~- z ":~i "s~ f~ ~' i 1 ~.....1 1 i i I~ 1 ~~ F-- ~ ~ - 1 1) . 1 WNW ` 1~1 ~. ~~ 1'~ ; ~ ~ ~ y E n....~ ~ ~~..i . ~ I~ ~ _ ,,.,, r , i ~ r I ~ WI QY -~ ggQ m ~ dl 7] Q y~~ r+ T F FCF W U 73 „~ TYPICAL COLLECTOR STREET CROSS-SECTION ETIWANOA SPECFN: PLAN FNi111E 5.39 .,y. A ^q ~'""~~'~`~~="?' ITEM: ESPA 90.01 CITY OF 1~51~TCi#~:.~UCAMONGA .I,~E; STREET sECTgNS PLANNING DMSION ~ EXHIBIT: a SCALE: ~- 7~ SUMMT AVENUE CROSS-9ECTNM! m 0 ti h h M1 M ~ ~ Q Q 1~. V o- W n ti W y J W b Q A W Z h a W y W M VON6M/13 j 4 O ti .C O b [~ °s@.c ~pOE e~°e2 ~N~N b b N b y~ 9 +~h~ Q V~VM Iy C~C~ C'J W • O J W h ,g W ~ ~~ ~ I ti N W ~ 1. Q N y ` ~i i ~O TN N ~ ~ Q p Q _~MJIyY IjJ 1 I/~3i ~ ! I tiN _, 3~ -' N W m 1 ~S W 0 N ti h Q '~'.- W W~ N 2' ~°o J~ Z ~N 3~ w.~ Q wOO{ g H x W 7~ OO OprG/ S 133H5 335 3/"/7 NJl H(.t/ m 0 M w. x m 00 oo+GZ ~6 133H5 X35 3N/7 NJ1YW _~T o _ ,t.' ,w ei of 0 0 0 0 iL o ~ o i o .t r_ o ~ o o o W W °° o 'e~ °° Q m ti a ~ ~ ° ~~ ~, of 0 o N ~ Q~ W ~ `^ ~ ~ u it i o _ LJI~JLL- ~, Wp a 13.,~rta ~~6 .~Nr~ irJtrw Ory oo•os+o/ QO J i Z ^ K {.. N W 3Y 7~ ~~ O h ti ~` V l~ W Wb pN Z O ~N ti 3~ h.~. p ,L~3/+5 3~ 3r ~ N.~1 ~~ ~~ ° o I ~ I I o a ~ ~I i` ° • O 1 m. •= e a r Q e ,~ . I~ , E n W ~~ J 1('~ O WWN > lm Q 6 0 y SL ~~ warms wmw y' ~ T i n J • K . W 7/ 0 Z h Gb SZ~Lfi ~ 133h5 335 3/ 1 II M W `l I ~N/JY~Y~pJ 'iti.~A~i' y ~ a ~ ~ ~ W ~~ 0 ? • ,.~, ., ti W u c Ey ~O ~N ~O t, iti p n.~ •N i~ io V W ~~ 0 ~/7/~'.9i1 b N6N6/VI /13 t w j ~~ H N S o. N ra v is I- u' o • O MlJyv 19./l ~0 ./f O 1 n N1~1Y 'F/ 4d I ~ wo r ..~. 1f~ o \ o N Jyv 1'l.p/ O J w a ,~ o n~syr rr . s w J w w Q o ~ ~ O o y ~y~ R. Nt ~ ~° w a ~ ~ {~ ~ N W O y WW~ 5 ~ o ,Y~n r ' v. w W 0 Si of W ~ ~ o w `~ h o ~ N ~ v o 2a, o ip o ~ ~ r ium w Yi ~` ~ o I l ~ W tiN 3~ ~'f.7+Lt o 1~ 7M4 v ~ . veyn , runv 0~ m 0 m H W ,~,.. W W C ~O xa a$ J ~ 2P ~N !~ i~ ~~ ~~R i m W J 2 Qh ti tit j y a 0 w a Q ~z T W (; +I ORDINANCE ND, Gl ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ET IWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01, AMENDING FIGURE 5-13 OF THE ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN ANO MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On Nay 23, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Etiwa nda Specific Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said pu6l is hearing the Plannf ng Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-61, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Etiwa nda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01. (i i) On August I5, 1990 and September 5, 1990, the City Count it of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings and concluded said hearing Drior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. e. Ordinance. ,The City Counc ii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Section 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the f,..~ sat forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the ordinance are true and Correct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the Droject has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of t970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. Section 3: The Rancho Cucamonga Cf ty Council finds as follows (a) That the proposed amendment is necessary in order to maintain public safety when determining the alignment of the public streets; and (b) That no reasonable and viable alternative, such as street realignment, exists; and (c) inai the proposed amendment, logetnnr with the conditions thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safely, ar welfare ar materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and (d) that the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Etiwanda Specific Plan. U~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. ESPA 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 5, 1990 Page 2 Section 4: That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Cade, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby approve on the 5th day of September 1990, Etiwa nda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01 amending Figure 5-13 as fol la ws: Figure 5-13: (Attached.) Sec lion 5: The City Clerk shall certify the adapticn of this Ordinance and cause the same to be publ lshed within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~/ ]~ _ Yy,?O~Xn Y~11N u j V ~~ ~(/~/ -f/1 0 esun •vc i / raonu aro.~~/~; j/ =~~ %i is ~; i a°. 4 //% i. i,: .. 7' // EXISTING STREET ~~TREES TO BE PRESERVED M~+ Existing Windbreaks r.wn. .~,~.~ ExfatMg Trsea w o.t. REVISED STREET TREE PRESERVATION S- ~ 3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA I'lI2E PRO'T'ECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 7Ct Mayor and Members of the Cily Council FROM: L. 1?ennis Michael, Fire Chief 13Y: Lloyd B. Almand, Division Chief~rc Marshal SUEIECf: Findings of Fact for Residential Automatic Pirc Sprinkler Ordinance: 1• BFbbT~tll?A1T4L1: Staff recommends approval of the Resolution detailing the );ndings of fact in support of the Ordinance requiring the installation of automatic fire sprinklers in single family and multi-family dwellings, as recommended by the Public Safety Commission at their lone 12, 1990 meeting. II. AACKGRO~,,mm The State of California, through its Health and Safety Code, mandates that Findings of Fact be adopted whenever a city or county makes changes or modifications in the requirements Contained is the provisions published in the State Building Standards Code (i.e. Uniform Building Code) that are considered to tx reasonably necessary bcceuae of local climatic, geological or tnnnn~nnR it nl .. d:,. _.. _ Although the law states that only one of the three aforcmentioncd conditions needs to uist when !ling the Findings of Faci, we have presented evidence o0 all three of the areas in an effort to subsmotiate more clearly and definitively the probltms that exist within the City and which emergency personnel have been and can be confronted with. Also, we have added anew dimension to the findings in that we have included graphic illustrations of what we have detailed in writing in en coon to add clarity and proof to our Findings of Fact. ~R~e's~~pe~c~tf~ull~y submitted, ~~//~ L. Deanla hiichaei ~ i Fire Chief v LDM(js ~6 RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~s~ A FESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY'S BUILDING CODE, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. g.~, ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY BECAUSE OF LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS. A (i) Califomia Health and Safety Code Section 17922 requires all cities to adopt, as the City Building Standards Code, the State Building Standards Code adopted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 4 of Part 2.5 of Division 13 of the Califomia Health and Safety Code, (ii) Pursuant to Califomia Govemmem Code Section 50022.2, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted by reference, the "llniform Building Codc, 1988 Edition." (iii) Section 17958.5 of the Califomia Health and Safety Code provides, in pertinent part, fls follows: a city or county may make such changes or modifications in the requirements contained in the provisions published in the State Building Standards Code and the other regulations adopted pursuant to Section 17922 as it determines, pursuant to the provisions of Section !7958.7, are reasonably necessary• because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions." (iv) Prior to making the modifications Dermitted under Section 17958.5 of the Califomia Health and Safety Code, this Council is required to make an express Bnding that such modifications or changes ere needed in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section ]7958.7. (v) This Council desires to amend the provisions of Section 3802 of the "Unifom? Building Code, 1958 Edition". (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. D. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved as follows: !. In E!! respect= EE Eet forth i.^. the Recitals, Psa .4, of this Rescluticn. 2, This Council does hereby expressly find and determine that the amendments set forth in Ordinance No. ~ amending Section 3802 of the "Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition" are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological end topographical conditions, This ezpreas finding is supported and based upon the following more specific findings and determinations; 8~ Resolution No. Page 2 A. G 1. A unique geological condition ezisls within the City of Rancho Cucamonga in that five earthquake faults arc present, which create the potential for severe damage and fire hazards. There is potential also for damage to roadways and iropairment of access for fire equipment to respond to emergencies in the event of a severe earthquake. Since January 1, 1990, the Ranchu Cucamonga area has been jolted by a[ least 26 earthquakes and attcr shocks, ranging from 3.1 to 5.5 on the Richter Scale. (Sec Exhibit A and A-1) 2. Adverse geological conditions exist throughout a substantial part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that give rise to excessive flooding. Flood control facilities are not adequate to handle the water flow that occurs during major rains. Some of the streets in the City arc actually designed and used for Bood control purposes, thus making fire and emergency access difficult during flood conditions. According to the City's Engineering Department, using Baseline Roed as the median cast-west street, during a norms[ rein season, the following streets are designed to tarty the mnoff as indicated: (a) Carnelian Street: 1,100 cubic feet per second, or 8,299 gallons per second (b) Hellman Avenue: 1,700 cubic feet per second or 12,717 gallons per seeoad (c) Hermosa Avenue: 2,700 cubic feet per second or 20,198 gallons per second As a consequence, many of the streets within the City are impaired during such flood conditions and such flooding causes physical damage to the streets and the accumulation of debris, all of which hinder the acecss of lire equipment to respond to fire emergencies. (See Exhibit B) Access of fire equipment responding to calls is often hampered by the adverse climatic end geological ^_onditions withtn Iha City: because all of the City's fire stations are in the nonheriy portion of the City, The nonhem area of the District is often the most dmnaged and impaired by the adverse climatic and geological conditions, thereby limiting access of emergency vehicles responding to calla within their own "first-in" district. (Sec Exhibit C) Resolution No. Page 3 B. rT~$APjHLAIr, The topography of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is generally that of a gently sloping inclined plane which projects from the base of the San Bernardino Mountains, at an elevatior. in excess oC 2400 feet above acs Icvcl, in a southerly direction where the elevation is approximately 1400 feet lower. Natural slopes of eight percent or greater generally occur in the northern third of the City. la many cases, :+lopes is the foothills exceed 40 percent. There ere two locations where steeper topography occurs in the southern portion of the City. These two locations are the Redhill area and the area directly east of Redhill Park. 1'he elevation changes caused by the mountains and hills creates the geological foundation on which the City is built and will continue to build. With much of the flatlands either already built upon or dedicated for approved projects, it can be anticipated that future growth will occur on steeper slopes and greater contrasts in tercain. All of these topographical conditions have created slower response times of emergency vehicles info the high growth areas, due to the extraordinary uphill slope of the land. C l'I .IMA'IF.; 1. Extreme high winds, commonly referred to as Santa Ana winds, arc generated from the desert and reach the basin through Devote Pass and first contact highly-developed areas within City boundaries at velocities, sometimes in excess of 80 mph. Extensive damage often occurs during such winds, including dowsed electric wirce, downed poles, feelnn ,m~~ Flnmino aanA and Auee 2. In recent years, beginning in Tate 1987, the City has incurred Santa Ana winds ranging in velocity from 80 to 83 miles per hour. On December 12, 1987, approximately 30 Edison power poles along Ease Line Road were snapped in half and blown down by the high winds. Those downed poles totally prevented the use of Base Line Road for emergency vehicles. Alternate emergency routes had to be utilized for the next three days. The use of those altemarc routes ceased delays in what would have been normal and routine emergency responses. 3. On January 22, 1988, winds again caused severe response problems. High voltage electrical wires were blown down at nnmcrou; tccattons thronAhaui the Cit}'. Emcrgccy apparatus were lied up at Ihose locations pending [he arrival of Edison electrical crews, which in some: cases exceeded one hour, 89 Resolution No. Page 4 4. On Febmary 16, 1988, winds again hit the City extremely hard. This particular time the high winds generated such a severe blowing sand and dust problem that the emergency units responding to a structure fire east of Haven Avenue were stopped in their tracks, due to no visibility. That incident not only stopped the emergency response, but also resulted in significant fire vehictc damage. Thesn adverse conditions result in: (a) Fircs (See Exhibit D) (b) Impairment of fire equipment access (Sec Exhibit E) (c) Delays in responses of fire equipment; and (d) Fire personnel and equipment committed to noo- fire emargcncies 5. Weather conditions, coupled with flammable vegetation in the City results in numerous wildland fires, which draw existing fire fighting forces from their structure protection duties for extended periods of time. This results in eztended rcspoosc times to structure fires when such personnel and equipment are committed to non-structural protection. (See Exhibit F) 3. The City Clerlc shall, and hereby is directed to, forthwith upon the adoption of this Resolution, file a certified capy of this Resolution, together with certified copies of Ordinance No. ~'~ , with the California Department of Housing and Community Uevclopment as reyuired by Section 17956.7 of the Califomia Health and Safety Cnde 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS _ day of _ 1990, Mayor 9v /1TIn[) AT Tl STAFF REPORT ~,~~"'"j'"'~~ 9 CI t li GATE: September 5, 1990 r?-~I~~, ~ !; T0: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager 19'' J FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLERS I. RECOMMENOATI ON: It is recommended by the Pu hl is Safety Commission that the City Council review the accompanying ordinance and, if found to be consistent with direction given by the Council for, its' preparation, that ±he City Council Conduct a pu 6l is hearing and hold first reading of the Ordinance. II, BACKGROUND: On April 18, 1990, the City Council directed staff to prepare a residential fire sprinkler ordinance and requested the Public Safety Commission to hold hearings on the matter ana make recomnenda ti ons to the City Council in that regard. The Public Safety Commissi nn held public hearings on of June 5, and June 12, took testimony from industry and staff members, made modifications to certain staff recommendations and referred the information back to the City Council with a reccrcr,endation for adoption. III, ANALYSIS: Current building regulations require an automatic sprinkler system in multi ole residential bu ildinas exceeding two stories in heicht or incorporating more than 15 dwelling units. The proposed ordinance amends and supplements the existing building codes currently in effect, adding two new standards (based upon National Fire Protection Association Standards 13D and 13R) to the current Uniform Building Code Standards and amending the current Uniform Building Code requiring sprinklers in all other new residential buildings and certain accessory buildings in close proximity thereto. The accompanying draft adopts, by reference, the two nationally recognized standards outlined above. The locations identified by asterisks in the accompanying standards are those where changes or addf tions Nave been proposed to adapt the published documents to the codes or the Public Safety Commission's conclusions. Wording proposed for sections so identified can be found in the body of the ordinance. The significant technical changes to the published standards are: One and Two Family Dwellings a. Alarm bell(s), alerting occupants and surrounding properties are required on all systems, deleting the exception far substitution of smoke detectors in their place. q~ STAFF REPORT: RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLERS Septea6er 5, 1990 Page 2 b. The standards and building code have been modified to require fire Sprinklers in garages and carports attached to or within 30 feet of a residential building on the same property or within five feet of a property line. c. A fire department connection (a stand pipe to allow the fire. department to increase pressure in the system) is required for buildings over 5000 sq~ia re feet in area. Mul ti ole family dwellings lest than three-s£nriec ;n he~hr or rgmnr;gcd of 15 units or less a. Connection of the alarm system to a central station (constantly manned monitoring agency) is required. b. The standard 'nos been revised to require sprinklers in pent-house equipment rooms, crawl spaces, floor and ceiling spaces, elevator shafts, etc., but allowing omission of sprinklers in attics not utilized for living or storage. It is contemplated that administra tign and enforcement of the regulations will 6e the respon sf bil ity of the Building and Safety Division with cooperation and assistance from the Fire District. This is due, in part, to a recent Attorney General opinion questioning authority of fire districts to erect building regulations. Further, because the proposal is directly related Lo construction rather than maintenance of buildings, the City Attorney has recgmmend ed that the proposed ordinance became a part of the City's building regulations. f inu n~iai ouppurL iur en iurceinenL wiii ue ueriveu tram fees charyed rut plan checking and permits, with secondary supplement from the Fire District. As requested, Public Safety Commission documentation is being submitted under ;e oa ra to cover. IV. SUMMARY: The accompanying ordinance represents the combined efforts of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Building and Safety Division in conjunction with direction from the Public Safety Commission to meet the needs of the city and respond Lo the City Council's direction. The results of that effort are submitted herewith for your review and consideration. Respectfully submitted, erry G~t Build ng Official JRG/kes ~~ OPDINANCE N0.426 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGP., CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMON GA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING B'Y REFERENCE STANDARDS Nf PA 13D ANC NFPA 13R, BOTH PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES AND CERTAIN BUILDINGS ACCESSORY THERETO, WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO SAID CODES A. Recitals (i) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code authorizes adoption by reference of National Fire Protection Association Standards NFPA 13D, 1989 edition, and NFPA 13R, 1989 edition, each as pu6l fished by the National Fire Protection Association. (ii) At least one copy of each of said Standards, certified as a full, true and correct copy thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the city of Rancho cu ramonga, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 5C022.6. (iii) A duly noticed public hearing as required by the Government Code Ser. tior 50027.3. has henn cn nductrd and rnnrl udad nri nr to the ado ntinn of this Ordinance. (iv) P.11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have occun•e d. B. Crdi Hance NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: SECT IUN 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code entitled ^au;ln; ,.~ ~o str.^t; ,•f the C;".Y CCUnC iI ..c 'h2 Ci`•i Ra nC hG Cucamonga is hereby amended, provided that said amendment~shali not ~a pply Lo or excuse any violation thereof octurri ng prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, and provided further that the Uniform Codes adopted and amended by Ordinance No. 412 of this City shall continue to be applicable to construction for which permits have been issued pi for to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 3: Chapter 15.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Section 15.12.166 and 15.12.168 to read as follows: ~'3 Ordinance No. 426 Page 2 1512.166 Settf on 3802 (h) Amended - Grou R, Division 1, Occupancies. Section 3802 h of said Uniform Building Coe is amended to read as follows: Section 3802(h) Group R> Division ! Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 1 Occupancy as follows: In every apartment house three or more stories in height or containing more than 16 dwelling units, and every hotel three or more stories in height or containing 20 or mare guest rooms, the system is to be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1, "Design Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems," except that residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall 6e used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. The water flow alarm for such systems shall be monitored by an approved central station. 2. In all new Group R, Division 1 Occupancies, other than those specified in subsection (h) 1. above, the system shall be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less than Three Stories in Height." 15.12.168 Subsections 3802 (i) and (j) added - Group R, Division 3 and Oraua ~~, D~ ivi s7 on 1, ccuaa nci es. Section 3802(1) Group R, Division 3, Occupancies. An automatic fire surinklina sv5tem shall he installed in all new Grouo R. Division 3 Occupancies. System design and installation shall he conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses." (j) Group M, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic fire sprinkl- ing system shall be installed in all new Group M, pivi Sion 1 Occupancies constructed within ten feet (10') of a residential occupancy. EXCEPTION: Group M, Division 1 Orc upa nci es exempt from permit requirements by Section 301(6) 1 of the Uniform Administrative Code, as adopted. ors v~ro ga age nd.^, sports 't lac h^d t^ or acc ry to residentiah buiJldings mayybe suppli zd from the system `serving the primary use, however, piping and installation within the accessory portions shall be in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1. Ordinance No. 426 Page 3 SECTION 4: Chapter 15.14 is hereby added to Title 15 of the Cucamonga Munici pal Code, adopted by Ordinance 412, of the City Cou»ci1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to read in words and figures as follows: CHAPTER 15.14 Uniform Building Code Standards Sections: 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope 15.14.030 Section 2-1.3 Amended - Inspection and Testing 15.14.040 Section 2-4.2 Amended - Fire Department Connections 15.14.050 Section 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers 15.14.070 Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 Rdded - Adoption of NFPA 13D Standard by Reference 15.14.080 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope 15.14.090 Section 1-5.1.2 Amended - Listed and Approved 15.14.100 Section 1-5.1.4 Amended - Testing and Inspection 15.14.110 Section 3-1.1 Amended Valves and Drains 15.14.120 Section 3-6 Amended - Alarms 15.10..130 Section 3-7 Added - Fi re Department Connection 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers Section 15.14.010 Uniform Buildine Code Standard 30 3 Added Standards, adopted by Ordinance No. 412 of-the City of Rancho cucamon ga, is hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 13R Standard. 1989 Fdi tinn; n~i hllcho•i ~..• lhr iie ~iunai ri re rnotection Association, Inc. Said NFPR 13R Standard shall be referenced as Uniform Building Code Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries less Than Three Stories in Height" and shall be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems required by Section 3802(h) 2. of the Uniform 8uil ding Code as adopted by this ordinance, except as further amended by Sections 15.14.020 through 15.14.060 following. Section 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Scooe. Section 1-1 of said Uniform building Code Standard 38-3 is hereby amended to read as foll oWS: Section 1.1 Scope. This standard shall be used in design and ins tailation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in residential uCtupancies iess than three stories in height, not withstanding any conflicting story-height referenced herein. r S Ordinance No. 426 Page 4 Section 15.14.030 Section 2-1.3 Amended - Ins ecti on and Tes tin . Section 2-1.3 of said Uniform Buil tog Code Standard 38-3 is hereby amended to read as foilows: Section 2-1.3 (a) Inspection and Testing. All supply piping shall be hydros to titally tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. All systems shall be flow tested in accords r.ce with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Standards. r--~~~~~ ~~o~ ~e re yues red by the permtttee at stages of construction as outlined below; When underground piping is camel ere but prior to conceal- ment of any portion thereof and prior to coon ec tien Lo the overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for inspection. 2. When all overhead piping, fittings and riser are installed but prior to concealment of any portion thereof, Hydro- static test gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. 3. When piping has been concealed and all sprinkler heads, alarm bell(s) flaw and tamper valves and monitoring devices installed and/or connected. re<r;.^.g of associated devices, ie. alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring systems is to be conducted at this time, --" - 'S.i4. vyu Sec cion o-n.2 wnended - Fire De ar tment Connec- tion. At least one, one and one-half inch 1{2" or one, two and Dire-ha f T2 1/2") fire department connection shall be provided when the sprinkler system has twenty (20) sprinklers or more. Fire department connections shall be located in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Section 1514.050 Section 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms, Ser--lion 2-4.6 of said Uniform Bui ding Code Stan and is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 2-4,6 Alarms. All water flow alarms shall 6e monitored by an approved central station in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Section 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - Lnra Linn or S~^rn klers. ,. . - - -' s-•° °~~~~~~~~~ ~~i~~uiy rude Standard 35-3 is hereby amended as follows: Section 2-6 Location of Sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed in all areas. G J~ Ordinance No. 426 Page 5 EXCEPTIONS: Sprinklers may be omitted from bathrooms not exceeding fifty-five square feet (55 sq.ft.) in area with non- combustible plumbing fixtures. Sprinklers may be omitted from small clothes closets where the least horizontal dimension does not exceed three feet (3f t.) and the floor area does not exceed Lweniy-lour square feet (24 sq.ft.j and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with material of Class I flame- spread classification, as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. Buil Rdded - Adoption of NFPA 13DStandard b Reference. The Uniform Bui ding Lode Standards adopted by Ordinance No. 4 2 of t e City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 13D Standard, 1989 Edition published by the National Fire Protection Association, Inc. Said NFPA 13D Standard shall be referenced as Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4, "Installation of Rutomatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses," and shall be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems requ7 red by Section 3802(1) and (j) of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by this ordinance, except as further amended by Sec ti ores 15.14.080 through 15.14.140 following. Section 15.14.080 Section 1.1 Amended - Sco e. Set ti on 1.1 of said Uniform 8ui.ding~ Code Standard 38-4 s ereby amended to read as follows: Sec t9 on 1.1 Scope. This standard shall be used in the design and installation of automatic sprinkler s5's terns installed in dwellings and lodging houses and in certain accessory buildings, not withstanding any references herein to mobilhomes. Section 15.14.090 Section 1-5.1.2 Amended - Listed and A roved Devices. Section 1-5.1.2 of said Uniform Bui ding Code Stan and 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1-5.1.2. Listed and approved devices. Only listed or approved devices and materials shall ha ~~sen i.^, automatic fire >pi inkier sys iems. Ordinance No. 426 Page 6 EXCEPTION: Listing may be waived for tanks, pumps and for support devices as permitted by Section 3-4.1. Use of unlisted devices shall be approved by the Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire Chief. Section 15.14.100 Section 1-5.1.4 Amended - Testing and Inspec- tion. Section 1-5.1.4 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended tc read as follows: Section 1-b.4.(aj lns pee ti on and Testing. All systems shall be hydrostatically tested in acco rdznce with NFPA 13 Standard. All systems shalt be flow-tested in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protec ticn District standards. (b) Inspections shall be requested by the permittee at stages of construction as outlined below: 1. When underground piping is complete but prior to conceal- ment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to he in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for inspection. 2. When all overhead piping, fittings and riser are installed but prior to concealment of any portion thereof. Hydro- static test gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. 3. When of ai na has been concealed and all sorinkl er heads. alarm bell(s) flow and tamper valves and monitoring devices installed and/or connected. Testing of associated devices, ie, alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring systems is to be conducted at this time. Sec±ion 15.14.110 Section 3-1.1 Amended - Valves and Drains. Section 3-1.1 of said Uniform Building Code Sta ndar 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 3-l.i Valves and Drains. Each System shall have a single control valve arranged to shut off both the domestic and sprinkler systems, and a separate shut-off for the domestic system only. EXCEPTIONS: The sprinkler system piping may have a separate control valve where supervised by one of the following methods: / v Ordinance No. 426 Page 7 a. Central station, proprietary or remote station alarm system. b. Local alarm service that will cause the sounding of an audi 6le signal at a constantly attended point. 2. .4 separate shut-off valve is not required For the domestic water supply in multipurpose piping systems. Section 15.14.120 Section 3-6 Amended - Alarms. Section 3-6 of said Uniform Building Code Sta odor 38-4 is hereby amen a Lo read as follows: Section 3-6 Alarms. Local waterflow alarm(s) shall be provided on all systems. The waterflow alarm or ai arms shall 6e located on (an) exterior wall(s), or such other location(s) as approved by the Building Official witn the concurrence of the Fire Chief, and so located as to be audible throughout the building. Section 15,14.130 Section 3-1 Added - Fire De artmerrt Connection. Chapter 3 of said Un sorm Building Code Standard 3 -4 is hereby amende by addition of Section 3-1 to read as follows: Section 3-1 Fire Oe pa rtment Connection. All R-3 occupancies exceed- ing 5000 sq.ft. in floor area shall be provided with an approved ff re department tonnes ti on ?ns called in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Section 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amended - Inca Linn of S~r;~vt o.~ aec tton 4-6 of said Uniform Building Ccde Standard 36- is ere by amen a to read as follows: Section 4-6 Location of Sprinklers. Sprinkl er•s shall 6e installed in all areas. ERCEPTI ONS: 1. Sprinklers may be omitted from bathrooms not exceeding fifty-five square feet (55 sq.ft.) in floor area with non- combustible plumbing fixtures. ~. Sprtnklers may be omit±ed from small closets where the least horizontal dimension does not exceed three feet (3 ft.l and the floor area does net exceed twe nt v-four saua re feet (24 sq.ft.) and the walls and ceiling ~a re surfaced with materials of Class I flame spread classification as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. ~9 Ordinance No. 426 Page 8 Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. Sprinklers may be omitted from entrance foyers that are not the only means of egress. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cau se~ tie same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the iniaud Valle- ~ Ocl Latin, ^.ews pe per of oenerai circulation published in the CityU o1 Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /~ 170.1 Copyright t 19a9 NFPA, All Righn Reserved NFPA 13D Standard for the Installation oI Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two•Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes 1989 Edidoo This edition of NFPA 13D. Standard/or the Insm(lazion o/Sprinkler Systems m One• and 7wo-Fami(r Dwellings and.3fabile Homes, was preppared by the Technical Cnmmllttt on Auromatic Sprinklers, released by the Correlating Committee on Waur Extinguishing Systems, and atted on by the National Firc Protection Association. Inc. a[ its Fall Meeting held November 1417. 1988 in Nashville. Tennessee. [t was issued by the Sundvda Council on January 11, 1989, with an eBemivc date of February 6, 1989, and superudn all previous editions. the 1989 edition of this standard has been approved by the American National Standards Ins[itute. Changes ocher Shan edimrial are indicated by a vertical rule in [he margin of [he pages on which they appear. Thee lines are included u an aid [o the suer in idennPying changes from the previous edition. Orlgia aad Developauot of NFPA 13D Recoflmzing the need m reduce the annual life loss from fire is midmtial occupancies (about 30 percent of total lou of life by fire), the Committee oe Automatic Sprinklers appomtea a suocommntee m May IY7! to Drcpare a 5nndard on the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Ooe-aad Two•Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes. The Subcom• mi[tee was composed of members of the Committee oo Automatic Sprinklers and other technically competent exper[s. The suadard wan submitted and adopted at the Annual Meeting in Chicago, IL on May 11-16, 1973. The 19811 edition was a comple[e rewrite of fhe 1973 edition including SI units where appropriate The 1980 edition incocponted the route of the residential sprinkler tm program administered by the National Firc Protection Association, and funded by a reunrch great from the United Sutas Fire Administration, Factory Mutual Reuarch Corporation, aad the Los Angeles City Fire Department conducted the dwelling tau. Fanary Mutual Research Corpontion, M<Neary Insunott Consulting Servirn apd the Charlene, Non6 Carolina Fire Departmen[ conducted the mobile home tats. After gain.ng pnttln; experience with the 1980 edition, madificatiom Io the sundard, including removal of design panmmers for dry-pipe spaems, were made in the 1984 edlnon. Th< 1989 edition proviCes for the recognition of antifraze systems, an update on the fire Insses in onr• and two-family dwa!!in8s, and eBers new guidance far r». si:ioning of residential spnnalers on sloped and beamed ceilings. Requirements have also been prowdcd for :he installation o(resideatial sprinkler in high•tempenturc areas. / tMlaasr ~~ l ]3D-2 LVSTALIATION OF SPRINKLER SYETEMS 14 ONE- AND TV.4FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MOBILE HOMFS Committee pR Water Extinguishing Systems Correlating Committee Paul D. Smil4 Chairman Gage.Babcoek & Assaialn Inc. Raben E. Solomoq SKretarv National Fire Proswtien Axwciasion (Nanwsingl Hagar. .. „. -- Thames J, emwn Je, Faetoru M1lurul Reuarch Corp, Casimir J. Dgges Jr., MhM Pro!edion Consulum; R¢hvrJ Mnrtinerv. Mid Hudeoa Amomatic Sprim kl<r Cory RwMrc 11 Mm, Mmrevnwa. NI Jsmes W, Nolw, Jamn W, Nolan Co. Chmkr W. Sehi.mer, Schmma Enginm9n6 Cory. Technical Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Chaser W. Scei<meq Chairman Schirmo Engianrivg Cary, Stephen R. Hmzm, SKnlury Kempcr Group (Alservase so H. Wiv<hdl) Edward C. Becon, Depl. of Pablie gafery Rey. FMANA Cherl<s B. Bvneu, Aummaue Sparkler Corp. of n RcpCNFSA Alhen N. Comfy, Jr., Cuniv Cox K<nnerly R<P. AIA u-p.:,u,a,... e,.., ~ r wR<P Af1MA Jahn L. DeRw, Umun Carbide Corp, Rep. NFPA IFPg Lee J. Dosedle, Unden~rinrs taboramnes Inc. Lmea R. Dowling, Narl, Assn. of Hama Avildus (Vote Li.T.imd la IJD and 130.) Robert E. Duke, Frt Control In<. Roper; J. Gray, fire Sp<a, Inc. R<F AFSA W. Dvrid ailmn, Cobb County Firo Depr. Rcp, IAFC Richvd E. Ilughq, ISO Commmcial Risk Scrv¢es Rolf H. Jensen, Rnlf laser 6 Azsacna<s Inc. Kenneth W.1 ieden Industrial Rivk Insurers P. J. Lakes, Grinnell Fve Promaion Sysa<m Co. Lid. R:p. CASA WvYve M. Marliq to Avgelm CisY Fir< Dept. Joha G.OTIN14 GagbBLbrock dz Aswzie¢s Ivc. J. k Rlchardwn, Nasl. Pesearth Couvcil of Gvada P. I. &hlRhaur, F'aasman KoMk Co. J. Tom Smit4 US Firt Admipksn4on (Von Iimind to 13D and I ]R) Wilik R. Tsmpllq Am<rinn Awrnmalic gprinkler, Rep. AFSA William 4T n, Grinnell Fart Pmt, Sysmms Co.lne. Itep. NFSA John J. Wakh, UnisW Aun. of JOVmcym<n k Ap- prevtius of she Plumbing & Pipe FiNog Intl. of she US k Canada W Nliam D. Wihon, Cennr (or Fire Acwrch WIIRw ¢. Wilwq Fsmry Mutual Rcmarch Corp. Narry R. Wiv<hell, 4berly Mutual Imunnce Cv. RcF Ml R. J. WHgh4 Uoderwrimn Laboneorin o(Canada D. M. YvW,1C1 Americas Inc. Rep. NFPA IFPS Iswk H. Lmmermaao, Addphia Aunmatic Sptln- kkr Co, Rep. NFSA 19M Eahd1 lD2- COMMITTEE iEA50\\'EL IJU-J Allrmew Aaea L. NWd. Famory Nwwl Arurrch Corp. (Alumne to w. E. wilan Dov R. Dsee, pov Chmn,nl Co. ;Almm~e m 1. L. De0.vo1 Tommy E. Eylaee, IndueMN 0.nk Ivsunn (Amman to K W. Lndetl Oa.le D. Eaet Cemer for Fire Rewah Ulumnc low D. wnmv) Avrull P, Fimbe,NW Fire Spnvkla AVn. (Allmne ro W. Tnul Dauer E. LeredcY, Cadenrinn LaTOnwnn Inc. IAlmmne w L, 1. OauNOI EewW R Wlq, L'ndmnun fabonwrim of Cw~ .d. IAlamne m R. J. WIINO Camll V. In.nl, Xeroa Cory. IAlamne to D. M. Yalu) Rrymoel D. Melb+, nmmcu Fln Sprinkler Aewc. IAlamne to R. 1. Gn;l J. R. MaTleery, Nap fuwrth ~=omn! IAlmmm to 1. K 0.i<Aardwnl Macon N. MnmIL Muvell k LeBmav Anhnecu (Amman to 1. G. O'Ngll Fraede J. MIYbeNC4 Emmrn KoNk Co. Wmm~e ro E, 1. 5<bilbnul Joraeb G. NuaL 5. Faudew Firt Drill. (Aiumv< w E. C. Bacaol CwaY W.O'4Vke. Ecbilmer Entmm~ve Cory. INUmNe ro C. W. SrAirmm) Jemm Rrlcbq Tba Vikive Corp. lApenau la C Brmm) Herq $tn.Inn. Aua, of Fin Cbnn (Altmuu w w, DeHd Hi11ov1 JatY Ttakm, Nun Amomenc Sprinkler Co. (NUmau w L Zimm<mavv) Jata Vaelnv{, TLe Sbsluov Cary. Wnreme m T. 6. Deyl Jde F. vkdr. HFP Sprinkler. Inc. (Na:vue w W. Templiv7 WIIW A- ffttt, Rolf Jtrxv ! Arwnialn Inc. (Nlemau m R. H. lemevl Nwmtlel FAwuE K Wekk Nuehn Aua. WIWw E. lolaL Kolel Ana Rep. Camminee on Wery w LIR lorry M. Iw, WomNd Firc Synema Subcommittee Iw RaldtlHtl Occugmdn Jate C. O'NNII, Chavman Geslr~lebeak l Awdun la. EJwW E. ledeleeL Huebn Aswc. IAYaId E, CeegMµ Reliable Automuk Sprinkler Co, Ina. Drew L Dnuee. Nan. Aue. of Home luiWen Rkterd E. HraeMy, I50 CommertiN M1iak Semen RNN Jeekre, NHwe Imurevu Co. HNylbey [eel. Famory Mumu p......" Cory. Greer E. [AnrleL Uvdervntm tAbanunn Ie<. DnNr Lu4Mr. MaryWO Firt Eempmmt Coryo- nsiov J. K lkterlree. Firt Reuuch Couvml of Canada Nary Stn. Inn. Auo, of Fin Cbieb J. Tw Smltt l/S Fin Admlmnnbon Willa L ?aau, GAnoell Fin Pmacvov Smema Co. Inc. WIRIw TYVmee, Kempn Gmup WIWu A. WrW Rolf lsanv cod Assoc. Inc. Potent E. Sebwe, NFPA Sul Livwn TAU fur rcprrunn IAr mrmdrnbp ar IW umr.Ar Commnar +w Tolland on IAr lul o71Au edmon Sue IAvr umA aAvnJrs m rhr memensAlp maY Ao.r asvma ' .bry o « fiyii m.u, v, „m Auonruoo or aoY dosum<ol dweloped by the Commmm oo wAlch the memMr urvm. rMe lam ~a3 ]3D-4 INATALUTION nF SP0.MKLmt SYSTEMS IN ONE AND TtWPAM16Y DWEWM1GS aNO MOBIiE NOMFS Contents Preface ............................................ .. ...... ..13D- 5 Chaplcr 1 General information ...... ............ .................13D- 5 I-I Scope ........................... ....... ...................13D- 5 I-2 Purpose ........................ ........ .. .......... .......13D- 5 I-3 Definitions ........................ ...... ...... ........ ...13D- 5 I-4 Maintenznce ......................... ... ......... ........13D- 6 I.5 Desigr. and Installation .................... .................13D- 6 !-6 Units .................................. ....... ..........13D- 6 Chapter2 Water Supply ...................... ... . ...... ..........13D-7 2-1 General Provisions ............. .......... .......... . ......13D- 7 2-2 water Supply Sources ...................... .................13D- 7 2-3 Multipurpose Pipin6 System ................. ...... ..........13D- 7 2.4 Mobile Home Water Supply .............. .. .................13D- 7 Chapter3 System Components ........ ..... ...... ... .... ... .... ..13D- 7 3-1 Vzives and Drains ........................ .................13D- 7 3-2 Pressure Gages ........................... .................130. 7 3-3 Piping ........................... ...... ..... .. .. .. ......13D- 7 3-4 Piping Support ........................... .................13D- 8 3-5 Sprinklers .............................. .................13D- 8 3-ti Alarms .......................... .. .. ... ............... ..13D- 8 Chapter 4 SYStem Design ....................... .................130. 8 41 Design Criteria .......................... .................130. 8 4-2 Position of Sprinklers ...................... .................13D- 9 4-3 SYStem Types ............................ .................130. 9 4-4 Pipe Sizing .............................. .................13D-10 45 Piping Configurations ....................... ....... .. ....... ..13D-ii 4-6 Location of Sprinklers ..................... ................ .13D-1I Chapter 5 Referenced Publications .................................131?-12 Appendix A ................................................. ...13D-I2 Appendix H Referenced Publinfions .............................. . .13D-IS Index ................................ .............. .... ......13D-19 ,~ ~~~ NFPA 13D Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Sys[ems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes 1989 Edition SOTICE~. in asmnsk l-l following the numberorlesterdesignat- ing a pamgnph md:ca¢s explanatory mamnal on that paragraph :n 'x PPcndt.s A. Iniermauor. on referenced publ:canons can be found in Chap•er and >npcndix B Preface It is intended alias this standard provide a method for those indrviduals wishing to install a sprinkler system for additional life safety and property' protecLOn. It is not ih< purpose of this standard to require the installation of an automatic sprinkler system. This standard assumes that one or more smoke detectors will be installed in accordance wsh V FP4 7a, Standard far the /nstnl(afron. sfamtenance. end Cse al Household Fire Warning Egmpmem Chapter I Genenl Information ~1 '1' Scode. This standard deals with the de<ivn anA in. '/ sta!latwn of amomal:c sprinkler systems for protection against the lire hazards in one- and two-family Qwellings and mobile homes I-1' Purpose. The purpose oRhis standard is to provide a sprinkler syv<m that well aid in the detection and control of rcsidenral-Gres and ;.lint provde improved protection against Inlury. ide !ass. and property damage. A sprinkler system msulled m accordance with this standard is exptto- ed to prevent Ilashover Itosal involvement) in the room of fire origin. when spnnklered, and Ip improve the chance for occupams to euape or be evacuated. Gmdelines are established for the design and installation of sprinkler systems for one- and two-family dwellings and mobiie homes. Nothing in this standard ~is intended to restrict new technologies or alternate arrangements prond- mg the level of safety prescribed 6v the standard is not ..n 1-3• Deflnltlons. Approved. Acceptable to the "authonty havingjurisdic- tion' NOTE, The National Fire Prot<chon Assocmion does nos approve. inspect or comfy anY imullations, prxedum. equipment. or matcnals nor does n approve or evyuatt tesun8 Uboramna. In desermmmg she acceptabdity of insullartom ur procedures. egmpmenl or masenaB, the authonty having lunsdienon may ease acceptance on com- ~~~ prance with VFPA or ocher appropnam standards. In the absence of such sundards. said auihanty mac require csr drnce of propcnmtallasion, procedure or vu. The aushontr having )unsdsnon may also rt(er to the listings or labeling practices of an organmuon cancemed with protlun aralua- tions which is in a position so determine compliance wuh apyropnatc standards for the cwrent production of lased items. Authority Haring Jurisdiction. The "authority having junsdicvon" is the organization, ofice or individual re- sponsible for "approving" equipment. an installation or a procedure. NOTE• The phase^atghodty haviaglunsdir.wn''u::=etl m NFPA documcna in a broad manner once lunsdscuons and "approval" age<cics vary as do char respons:bdn¢s. Where public u(ny is primary. Ne "authonty hanng)uns- di<tion" may D< a federal. state, Iwal or other regional depanmem or mdwidual such as a fin chmf. fire manhal. chic! of a fin prevention bureau, labor department. healm department. budding official, eleetncal inspntor. ar others hating nmmory authonty. For insurance purposes. an insur- ance mspecuon depanmens. rating bureau. or other insur- ance company rcpresemasrve may be the "authonrv having jurisdiction:' In many circumstances the property owner or his designated agent assumes me role of the "authonty hating sunsdscuon'": as government installatwns. the coin- manding elgcer or d<pattmenul oficial may be the "auNOr- isy having lunsdinion." Check V~Ive. ,4 valve which allows flow in one direction only. Ccnto! V<Ire-• A salve employed to conaoi Ishuq a supply of water to a sprinkler system. Dmiga Discharge. Rate of water discharged by an auto- :.... ;p,,,.Ll.~ .eµ~„aou w gaiimu pct minute. Dry System. A system employing automatic sprinklers anach<d to a piping sysam contatmng air under atmos- pheric or higher pressures. Loss of pressure from the open- ing o(asprinkler or detection of a fire condition causes the release o(water into she piping system and out the opened sprinkler. Dwelling. Any building which contains not more than one or Iwo "Dwelling units" intended to b< uud, rented. Ieaud, let or hired om to be occup¢d. or which are occupied for habitation purpous. Dw<IIIag Uolt. One or mart rooms arranged for the uu of one or more individuals living together as in a tragic housekeeping unit, normally having cooking, living, sani• racy, and sleeping facilities. I~beIM. Equipment or materials to which Was been attacked a label, symbol or other identifying mark of an organization acceptable to the "authority having junsdic- tion' and concerned with product evaluation, that main- tains periodic inspection of production of labeled egmp- ment or matcnals and by whose labeling the manufacturer indicates compliance with appropnatc standards or perror- mance in a specified manner. Llst<d. Equipment or materials included m a list puh~ fished by an organzation ac<eptaDle m the ' authonts ~sn r n.o. fJD-b IS'tT/,LUiION OF sPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN VNE having jurssdiction" and concerned with product evalua- tion, that maintains periodic inspection of production of listed equipment or materials and ~,vhos<listing states either that the equipment or material meets appropriate standards or has been msted and found suitable for use in a specified manor:. VOTE; The means far identifying lis!ed equipment may ran'ror each organization concerned with product evalea- tich, some of which do not recognize cquipmem as listed unless it is also labeled, The "authority having jurisdiction" should utilize the sy:um employed by the listing organiza- IIOn le ide~ti rya I,a{~d pmA,~n~ Mobile Home. Afactory-assembled structure equipped with service comrections and mace su as to be readily movable as a amt on its mm~ing gear and designed to be useri as a dwd!ing unit with or without a foundation. Multipurpose Piping Systems. Piping systems within dwellings and mobile homes intended to serve both domes- tic and fire protection needs. Preenginecred System. A psckageA sprinkler system in- cluding all components connected to the water supply designed to be installed according to pretested limitations. Pump. A mechanical device that transfers and/or raises the presure of a (laid (water), Residential Sprinkler. An automatic sprinkler which has been specifically listed for use in residential occupan- ~ic>. Shall. Iodinates a mandatory requirement. iuwcams a recommenaauon or that which is advised but not required. Sprinkler-Automatic. Afire suppression device which operates automaticall) when its heat-actuated clement is heated to or above its thermal rating allowing water to discharge over a specific area, Sprinkler System. An integrated system o(piping con- nected Io a water supply, with listed Sprinklers that will automatically initiate water discharge over a 5re area. when required, the sprinkler s} stem also includes a contro! vah'e and a device for actuating an alarm when the system operates. Standard. A document containing only mandatory pro- visions using L';c 'xord "sisall" to indicate requirements. E%planalDR matcri.v may rye incuded ~-!y :- -;:,, ,,, ..uc p,iui' nines, in iootnoces. or m an AppendixlV Supply Pressure. Pressure within the supply (i.e., city or private supply water source;. System Pressure, A pressure within the system (i.e., above the control valve). WaterOow Alerm. A sounding device activated by a walertlow detector or alarm check valve and arranged to sound an alarm that will be audible in all living areas over background noise levels with all intervening doors closed. 1Wa FgeN~ AND TWPFAMILY DWELLI4C5 A8D MOBILE HOME$ Waterflow Detector. An electric signaling indicator or alarm check valve actuated by water Flow in one direction cnly. Wet System. A system employing automatic sprinklers attached to a piping system containing water and connected to a water supply so that water discharges immediately from sprinklers opened by a fire. 1-0. lfaintenance. The owner is responsible for the con- dition of a sprinkler system and shat! keep the system in :,~, a Dpantipg wudilion. I-5 Design and Installatimt. 1-5.1 Devices and Materials. 1-5.1.1' Only new residential sprinklers shall be employed in the ins[aiiation of sprinkler systems. -5.1.2 Oaly listed and approved devices and approved materials shall be used in sprinkler systems. Exception: Listing maybe waived for looks, pumps, hang- ers, waterf]aw detection devices, arsd waterflaw valves, 1-5.1.3 Preengineered systems shall be installed within the limitations which have been established by the testing Iabomtories where listed. ~-5.1.4' All systems shall be tested for leakage at normal system operating water pressure, Exception: When a frre department pamper connection is provided, h):drostatic pressure tests shall be provided m accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Inslal(ation of Sprinkler ,Cvarnmr 1-b Units, Metric 'snits D( measurement in this standard are in accordance whh the modernized metric system known as the international System o(Unili (SI). Two units (liter and bar), outside of but recognized by SI, are cam- monly used ininternational fire protection. These units are listed in Table 1-6 wiiil coaversion factors. I'eble Ifi flame a( Unil Unit Symbol Conversion Factor liter L I gal = 3.785 L pascal Pa I psi r 689a.]5] Pa bar bar 1 psi = 0.0689 bar bar bar I Ear = 105 Pa Fur adairinna, convcnm...am,.m..ma..ec::_~ ....~ ,~~~, Merck Prani<r. ~~ ,~~~~~~~~~ 1-b.l If a value for measurement as given in this standard is followed by an equivalent value in other units, the first stated is to be regarded as the r<quir<ment. A given equiva- lent value may be approximate. Ib.2 The conversion procedure for tha S[ units has been to multiply the quantify by the conversion factor and then round the result to the appropriate number of significant digits. ~v6 wniER SErrI]'t1sTEw CONRO\E\is IJD- Chapter 3 Water $UpPIY }Ll .4ddinonal drains shall be installed for each trapptd portion of a tlrp system which i> subject to freezing temper scores. 2-1 Central Provisions. Every automatic spnnksr system snail have a: lean one asrtematic water supply'. when Stored }2 Pressure Gages. waur o used as the sole source of supply, the minimum }i.l A pressure gage shall be installed to indicate au quaneny shall equal the water demand talc nines 10 min- rcysure on dry sys[emsand on wamrsu I ressure tanks. ores ISre 4-! !.1 p PP Y P .. Y RSter Supply Sources. The foi!owmg water supply wurces are acceptable: lal 4 connernon to a tellable water works s'stem. iii ., r. =a aRd taus. In A pressure tank installed in accordance with NFu,4 13. Smndard far the lnsaallauon o% Sprinkler Systems. and S FP.4 _'.', Smndard (or (Ldfer 7an{g for Private Fire Pro(ec- YJn. Idl Astored waver scarce with an automatically operated pump. 2-T 1lullipurpose Piping System. A piping system urv- ing both sprinkler and domestic needs shall be acceptable when: lal' In common water supply connections serving more than one dwelling unit. 3 gpm (19 Lrmin) is added to the spnnkler system demand to determine the size of common piping and the size of the total water supply r<quir<ments. (b) Smoke dnecmr, are provided in accordance wnh ~'FP,4 ]4, Stanc'ard for the /nuallauan..Na:ntenance, and Cu u% Household Firt Warning Equipment. ,'rl A I pipin¢ in ifre tj sitm conforms io the piping speclficallons of tNs standard. Idl Permitted by the local plumbing or health authority. t-r ,vtoone Home wamr buPPlri n water supply tot a spnnklered dw<Il.ng manufactured off-site shall nos be less than that spenfied on the manu(aaur<i s nameplate. (See J.J 3sk. Eactmmn.~ }3 Piping. }7.1 Pipe or tube used in spnnkler sysems shall b<of the materials in Table 3-3.1 or in accordance with J-3.2 through 3-3.3. The chemical properties, ph)'sicai properties. and dimensions of the matenals I¢ted m faole 3-7.1 shall be at least equivalent to the standards sled in the table and designed to withstand a working pressure of not less than US psi (12.1 bars). Lbl< }7.1 Mu<dds and Dmmensions Smdvd Specificaton far Welded and Seamless Stet! Pipe ASTM A33 Wrough451ee1 Pipe ANSI 036.1OSi Specifications for Ekctneftewtan<e Welded Steel Pipe ASTM AI33 Copper Tube (Drawn. Seamless) Specincmion for Seamless Copper Tube ASTM B]3 Spenfintian (or Seamless Copper Water Tube 45TH Bg8 Specification (or General ftequuemems for Wro~isht Seamless .: oPMr and Copper-Allay Tube ASTM gs_31 Braxmg Filler Metal IClusificauon gCuP4 or BCu P-4) AWS A5,8 ~i..., 95-5 ITin~Anumony-Grade 95TAi ASTM 83: }J.3 Other types of pipe or tube ma7 be used. but only those investigated and listed for this service by a t<sttng and Chapter 3 System Componmb inspection agency laboratory. }7 Yalves and Drains. ~}L1 Each system shall have a single control valve ar- ranged wshut off both the domntic and sprinkler systems, and a separate shutof[ valve (or the domestic sy5t<m only. Ex<•epnon ,v'o. Ir The rpnnk(er sYrrem piping may have a reparate control vat ve where tupervind by one of the jallow- mrmethods' n remml patina p _p•rrmry _. rrma...._.._.. a!a.... SPIV:P. rb/ Lora! alarm service that wdl muse the sounding of on audible signal ar a c>nrtanrly attended pom:, or /rl Lackrng the valuer open. E.rreptron .YO. Z: d separate shutoff valve a nor rrquved for the domenm water mpply m multipurpose prping syrrems, l•1.3 Each sprink'er system shall have a ~h in. 0 J mm) or larger drain and ten connection with valve on the system side o(the control valve. }).J whenever the ward pipe is used in this standard. is shall b< understood to also mean tube. }J./ Schedule l0 steel pipe may b<joined with mechani- cal groove couplings approved for xrvice with grooves rolled on she pipe by an approved groove rolling machine. 1J.5 Finings used in sprinkler systems shall be of the materials listed in Table J•J.3 or in accordance with J•J.7. '~' -~'T'Qi propcriiai. phjsicai piopeiiiii, dnd dlmcn- sions~of the materials listed in Table 3•JS shall be at least equivalent to the standards cited in the sables Finings used in sprinkler systems shall be designed so withsnnd the working pressures involved, but not less Than US psi (I J.I ban) cold water presure. 3•J.6 Joints for the connecsion of copper tube shall be brazed. E.rcepnon: Salderedyoints /p3•J solder rnrms} rnuv he rn,vl /or wet-prpe rapper ruM svaems. /U / t9a9 fa~gn 13D-8 la'srnunnon or ieble 3-3.5 htateriels and Dimensions Standard Catl iron Cos Iron T:mcadN Fitt~.ny's, Class 125 and 250 ..... ...... ..... .. . . ANSI Islti.4 Cast Iron Pipe Flanges aril Flanged Fittings .. .... ...... .... . ANSI E16.i Malleable Iron Malleable iron Threaded Fuungs, Class ! 50 and 300 .................... . ANSI E 15.3 J~Factory~made R'rougM Steel Hu«wcld Finings ..................... . ANSI B 16.9 Buttes<Itlmg Bnds for Fipo, Valves, Flanges, and Fittings ..... ... .... ... . ANSI H16?5 Spec for Piping Finings of Wrocght Grbon Stee and Alloy Steel for Moderate and Elevated Tcmpertures ...... . ASTM F 234 Prpe F'iaogu and Flanged Fitting, Steil Nickd Aliov and Other Special Alloys . . ANSI BI6.5 Forged Steel Fivings, Socket Welded and Threaded ....................... . ANSI B16.I1 Copper µ'rought Copper and Capper Alloy Solder-loin Pressure Fittings ............ ~ ANSI HI i.22 Cazt Copper Alloy Solder-Joint TKUFAAIILY DWELLINGS AYD No61LE HOMES ambi<nt Ceiling temperatures are between 101 and 150°F (39 and 6CC). 3-5.4 7hc following practices shall be observed when installing residential sprinklers, unless maximum expected ambient temperatures are otberwise determined, (a) Sprinklers under glass or plastic skylights exposed to direct rays of the sun shall he of intermediate temperature classification. (b) Sprinklers in an unventilated concealed space under unirsulated root, or in an unventilated attic, shall be of 3-55 Operated or damaged sprinklers shall be replzced with sprinklers having the same performance charact<ristiu as original equipment. 3-5.6 Painting and Ornamental Finishes. 3-5.6.1° sprinkler frames may be factory paieted or enameled as ornamental finish in accordance with 3-5.6.2; otherwise sprinklers shall not be painted and any sprinklers that have been painted, except for factory applied coatings, shall be replaced with new listed sprinklers. }5.6.2 Ornamental finishes shall not be applied to sprin- klers~by anyone other than the sprinkler manufacturer, and only sprinklers listed with such finishes shall be used. Pressure Fiuirgs ... .................. ANSI BIo.18 }5.7 When nonmetallic sprinkler Ceiling plats (esmrtch- eons) or recessed escutcheons (metallic or nonmetallic) are used they shall be lu'Cd based er. tcs:s of ;hC assembly o; a 3-3.7 Vther types of filnngs may be used, but only those residential sprinkler. investigated and listed far this service by a testing and ~~~y/q,~ inspection agency laboratory, ?~ Alarms. Local waler0ow alarms shall be provided on 3-4 Piping Support. Exception: Dwe!(ings or mahilehcmeshavingsmokederec- 3-4.1 Piping shall be supported from structural members [ors in accordance with NFP~ 74, Standard for fhe ~~sta/lo- uvngsupport methods comparable to those required t)' ripe, Mnin(enar¢e, and Use of Household Fire Warning !Deal plumbing codes Equipment Es<eptmn. Lured piping s7ra(1 be supported in ncrordam~e~ 3 7 ^~~ ne(h any Hsrme Gmun!lons, Chapter 4 System Design 3-4.2 Rpmg laid on open foists or rafters shall be secures to present lateral movement. 3-5 Sprillk~ers. 3-5.1 Listed residential sprinklers shall be used. The bass:', of such a listing shall be tests to establish the ability o(litt sprinklers to control residential fires under standardizedfice test conduions. The standardized room fires shall be hosed on a residential array of furnishings and finishes. dr' sea[ems unless s ea Iraf/y ~'Y.,"~,", °„~•„ „", V° ••°~•• ,,, Y Y D J +rsred far char pwpose. Pxceptial ,\'n. 1; Lisrcd dn' sprinklers mar he used m ac'cnrdnnn• with 43.1 3.5.3 OMinary temperature rated residential sprinklers (135 to I70°F i57 to 77°C)j shall be installed where maxi- mum ambient ceiling temperatures do not exceed 100°F (38°C). 3-5.3 Intermediate rated residential sprinklers (I'75 to 225°F (79 to 10TC)j shall be installed where maximum 4-1 Design Criteria. 4-ld Design Discharge. 7hc system shall provide a dis- charge of not less than IS gpm (68 Umin) to city single operating sprinkler and not Tess than 13 gpm (49 Umin) per sprinkler to the number of design sprinklers. 4-LP Number of Design Sprinklers. The number o(de- e,nn ~nr, -a ...:.~: -v nLI~:~~Aall :.,..I.~de a~~up::nki.'-.. n,,.,..i o~ Yaii- ...e...,-... ..... .. meet to a maximum ohwo sprinklers. 4-1.2.1 'fhe definition ofcompartment for use in 41.2 to determine the number of deign sprinklers is a space that is cnmplete!y enclosed by walls and a ceiling. The compart- ment enclosure may ha'ee openings to an adjoining space if the openings have a minimum lintel depth of 8 in. (203 mm) from the ceiling. 4-1.3 Weter Demand. The water demand for the system shall be determined by multiplying the design discharge of 4-I.I by the number of design sprinklers of 4-1.2. 1989 EO,IIm / x G 4-1.4 Sprinkler Ca'enge. 41.4.1 Residential sprinklers shall be spaced so that the maximum area protected by a single spnnklcr does nos ereeed 144 sq fs (13A m°). 41A2 The maximum divorce between sprinklers shall not exceeC C fi 13] ml on or between pipelines and the manmurn distance to a wall or partition shall not exceed b ft it 9 ml The m;mmum distance between sprinklers within a wmpanment ;hall be 8 fl 12.4 m). 4-1.5 The minimum operating pressure oC any sprinkler shall b< m accordance wnh the hsune informaticn of the spnnklcr and pronde the minimum Oow rates specified in 4.i.1. 41.6 Apolmazion rates, design areas, areas of coverage, and minimum design Dressures other than those spemfied in 1-LI. 4-L?, i-1.4, and 7-L5 may be used with special spnnklers whsh have been listed (or such specific residen- ual installation conditions. 4-2 Position of Sprinkler 42.1 Pendent and uptight sprinklers shall b< positioned so that the deflectors are within I to 4 in. (25.4 to 102 mm) from the telling. cxrepuvn' Spena( res+denrsal sprinklers sha(I be msralled m accordance wnh the listing lsmrrm+ons 42.2 Sidewall sprinklers shall be positioned so that the degeaors are within a to 6 in. (102 to 152 mm) from the caring. Escep+:vn Sprnul rer+drnrm( rp.wklers shall be imm/fed m aeordance ws+h the luting hrmanam. 1-2.3- spnnklers shall 6c positioned so that the reipon5e time and dixharge are not unduly affected by obsvuctions such as ceding slope. beams. or light fiztur<s. 43 System Typn. 47.1 W'et-Pipe Systems. A wet-pipe system shall be used when all piping Is mswllM in areas not subject ro freezing. t 43.2 Dry•Pipe Systems. where svstem piping is located in unhealed areas sub)ect to freezing, adry-pipe or ami- fre<ze system shall be uud. E.rcepuon: Loud standard dry-pendent or dry s+dewall sonnklers may be emended into unheated arras nor Intended for l+v+ng purposes. 43.3 And(reeu Syatemg. 47.7.1 DeBOitbo. An amifrttze system n one employing i a ..matte iplnkiCiaaaGifd iGa pipipg i'riiEm WpiaNillY ~ an antifreeze solution and connected so S water supply. The antl(reeze solution. followed by water, discharges immedi- ately from sprtnklen opened by a fire. 41.1.2' Where UsN, The uu of antt!rttze solutions shall D< in conformity wnh any state or local health regulations. 43.1.7 Antifreeu Solut(otu. 43.7.7.1 When sprinkler systems are supplied by public water connections the uu o(ami(reeze solutions other than /v~ nE51G\ 13D-9 ware solutions of pure glycenn< 1C. P. or O.S.P. 96S p<r<em grade) or propylene glycol shall not be permuted. Suitable glycerine-water and propylene gWcol-unto mir- tures are shown in Table 4-7.3.7.1. Lble 437.).1 Ann(rnu Solutions w D< Usad if Public Waer is ConnccrN to SOrinklers Specific Preening 5olurioe Gnriry a Point 1Lterial (by yalumcl 60•F (Ib.b'q 'F 'C C.P. or ^S.P, Grade• 40% Water 1,151 - - )0 0 30%W'ater L165 -4U -40.0 Hydrometer Scale L000 m 1100 Propylene Glycol ]0%Waur 102i + 9 -L.R 60%Wascr 1.0)4 - 6 -'_LI 50%Warer 1.041 -_'b -1-.- 40%Waser LpaS -bU -31.1 Hydrometer Sate L000 io 1.2001 Subdivisions 000'1 c P. -cn.m:nlly ram. V.S.P.-Untied Surer Pnarmuopoeu 96 5% 43.3.3.2 If public water is not connected to sprinkler. the commercially available materials indicated sit Table 43.3.3.2 are suitable for use in ao[ifrce:e solutions. 43.333' An antifreeze solution shall be prepared wnh a freezing point below the ezpect<d minimum semperature for the locality. The specific gravity of the prepared solution shall be checked by a hydrometer with suitable scale. TJk 473.3.3 Aad(resu Solatiooa m be lined i( PoEIk Water is not GOnnKled to Sprinkler Specific Freering Solalbo Cmiry at Point Mgurlgl IM VOlgeae) b0'F p3.b'Q 'F 'C Glycenee ((glycerine is used, xe Table 47,7 J I DieNylene Glycol 30%Wamr LO]8 ~-13 -75.U a5%Warer L081 -2] -)2.8 40% Water I,O86 -42 -41.1 Hydrometer Scale 1.00010 LI20 15ubdo'isions 0.00:1 Ethylene Glycol 61%Wamr LO56 -10 -J.] 36% Water 1.063 -20 -:8 Y 51%Walrr 1069 -]0 -74,4 d7% Wa¢r r07J -40 -40A Hydrometer Scale 1,000 ro 1.120 15ubdivmons 0.00:1 Propylene Glycol If propylene glycol a used. see Table 4.1 J } I Calcium Chloride Lb CaC6 per 80%"Flake" gal of Water fin Prolccnon Grndt 2.87 118 ] 0 - t - r Add corrosion iahihimr J3$ I ] I ` - I U - ] 1 s of sodium bichromue 1.89 I J )7 - _0 - `r v '/. oa per pl water 4.77 I _ Stl - JU - 4 a 4.77 :'i -40 -ao .. 0.97 ~:ri -SO a:., 'Frn fnm mynesium cnbnde and oib<r imnu,n~n :919 t Yn. /3D-10 IYSTALLAYIgN Or SPRINKLER STS TLME IN ONE. ANn TW0.EgMILY nWELLINGS A4n MOBILE HOMFS 4-3.3.4• Arrangement of Supply Piping and Valves. All permitted antifreeze solutions are heavierthan water. At the point of contact (interface) the heavier liquid will be below the lighter liquid in order [o prevent dilTusion of water into the unixated areas. In most cases, this necessitates the use ofa 5-ft (LS-m) drop pipe or U-loop as illustrated in Figure 4-3.3.4. The preferred arraugemer-t is to have the sprinklers below the interface between the water and [he amifreezc sclution. If sprinklers are above the interface, a check valve with a 'hz-in. (0.8-mm) hole in the clapper shall be provided in the U-loop. A water control valve and two small solution test valves shall be provided as illustrated in Figure 4-3.3.4. An acceptable zrrangement of a filling cup is also shown. E~moe 110tin ~ NoK CMeh NIn lMV n. t omre.e wn.n sPri~N e,. n,opaa. ApP,oretl A Art Blow 4vel OrVPwA mm. mam,;i„y ~; MEATEU rv c ~r.,~~ UNMEATEn I!uv'-!~yn APEA cbcN Nlve yr-- Ir/42'Male In ClapPerl Pitep Temm~ once voice NOTE: The 4„-in 10 A-mm) hob in the eherk salve c!^.p~ per is needed IB altos expanvcn of the solution during :. temperature rise and tlms prevem damage to sprinkles heads, :...:.. ........ . i,~. - .,, ....... ,n = a.,ore m. Figure J-3.3.J .Arrangemem of Supply Piping and Valves. 4-3?.5' Testing. Re(ore freezing weather each year, the so!utic.^, :n LEC crdi:c sys:c,T, shall be emptied inW conv:- nient containers and brought to the proper specific gravity 6y adding concentrated liquid as needed. The resulting solution may be used to refill the system. 4-0 Pipe Sizing. 4-4.1 Piping shall be sized in accordance with 4-4.3 anc 4-4.4. I( more than one design discharge is required (sec 9-!,!), the pipe sizing procedure shall 6e repeated for each design discharge Exception: When piping irsizrdhydrauiica((y, calcularions shall be made in accordance with :he methods described in NFPd !3, Standard for the Instal/anon of SprinklerSytrems. 4-4.2 Minimum Pipe Size. 4-0.2.1 Minimum pipe size, including copper piping, shall be r/. in. (19 mm). Exception: Minimum size ofstee( pipe shall be / in. (15.4 mmJ. 4J.3• To Size piping for systems wmeMed to a city water supply, the following approximate method is axepmble. This procedure cannot be used for gridded or looped type systems. Hydraulic calculation procedures in arcordance with Chapter 7 of NFPA 13 for grid-tyre or looped systems shalt be used. (a) Estahlish system flow rate in accordance with Section 4-I. (b) Detem;ine water pressure in the street. (c) Select pipe sizes. (d) Deduct meter pressure losses if any. [See Table 4-9s(d~.] (e) Deduct pressure lass (or elevation. (Building height above street in R x 0,434 = psi.) (Building height above street in meters x 0.098 =bars.) (() Deduct pressure tosses Rom the city main to the inside control valve by multiplying the factor from Table 4-4.3(a) or (b) by the total Itngth(s) of pipe in R (m). [Tots! length indcdes equivalent length of fittings es determined by applying Table 44.3(c).] (g) Deduct pressure losses for piping within building by multiplying Factor from Table 44.3(a) or (b) by the total iengm m rt Im) or eacn s;ze of pipe between the wntrol vah•e'and the farthest sprinkler, ' (h) Deduct valve sad fitting pressure losses. Count the valves and fittings from the control valve to the farthest sprinkler. Determine the equivalent length for each valve and fitting as shown in Table 4-4.3(c) and add these values to obtain the total equivalent length for each pipe size, Multiply the equivalent length Cor each size by the Factor from Table 4-4.3(a) or(b) and total these values. (i) [n multilevel buildings, steps (a) through (h) shall be repeated to size piping for each Door. Q) ]( the remaining pressure is less than the operating pressure established by the testing laboratory for the sprin- kler being used, a redesign is necessary. If this pressure is higher Than required, smaller piping may' be used when justified by calculations. Table J-1.3(a) Pressure Losses (psi/fq &hedule 40 Stee: Pipe. C = 120 Flow Pete -GPM Pipe Size I^• IU IZ 14 Ib 1E 20 25 30 35 40 4b SO i u.ua U.05 0,07 0,09 0.11 0.13 U.20 0.2E 0.37 0.47 O.SE 0.71 N 0.01 0,01 0.02 0.02 O.C3 0.03 0.05 0,07 0.10 0.12 0.15 O.I9 I'h 0.01 0,01 0.01 0.01 O.dl 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 ? - - _- - - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0,02 0.02 0.07 For 51 L101I'I I gvl ~ lla5 L; I WI ° 0.0689 bar; I fl ~ 0.]048 m. 1Ma Eahm ~/ SYSTEM DESIGN 11V-11 Tabk 4-4.J(D) Rnaure Imua (qi/fU Cvppnr Tubing-Types K. 4 rr IN. C = 150 Flow Rata • GPM TuDirg Type Sixe in. 10 IE 10 Ib I8 20 25 JO )5 W JS 50 M 0.08 0.12 QIb 0.30 0. _'S 0.J0 0.+6 064 D.dS - - - L O.IO 0.13 0.18 0.23 029 OJS 0.53 0]S L00 - - - K O,II 0,18 0.24 0.30 0.78 0.46 069 0.9] L38 - - - I M 00: O.OI 0,04 0.06 00% 0.08 O.U O.IB 0_'a OJO 0.78 0+6 L 003 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.08 D.10 0.15 0.20 02] 0.35 OA3 0.5J K 003 O.OJ 0.06 0.0) 0.09 O.II 0.1] 0.2a 0.31 0.40 O.j0 0.61 57 O.ul 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.0] 0.09 0.11 O.15 0.1] L 0.01 0,01 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.0) 0.05 0.0] 0.10 O.I2 0.;6 019 ,~ ,, ,,, _.~, _,__ nn2 On3 nns 006 QOd 0.11 0.11 0.1] U.]0 : , bt - 0.01 0.01 O.OI 0.01 O.JI 0,02 0,03 004 O.Oz 006 008 L - 001 0.01 0.01 0,01 0.01 0.02 0.03 O.C4 0.05 0,0] 0.08 K - U.01 O.OI 0.01 0.01 002 0.02 O,OJ 0.05 0.06 0.111 O.Ov _ ,ht _ _ _ _ _ _ o.Dl o,ol o.Dl o.ol 002 0.0: L - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0,02 0.0'_ K - - - - - - OAI 0.01 0,01 0.01 0,(C 0.02 Far 51 l:nns 'i qal. " ) 185 L. I i+: • 0.0699 Oac 1 n ^ 0.)049 m. Table JJ,3la) EquirJeol lsogtb of Piq in Feet fm Steel and Copper Fitfiwp awd Valor Elbows Tees 5'alm FitdngM1'abe Flow Flow Gkbe Dkmenr /S 90 Long Tbn TArv "Y^ in. Degten Degree Radiw Brawrb Run Gne Aode Gkbe Hnm Cock CAna I 2 I 4 1 1 10 21 II 3 7 1 I J 5 I 12 28 I: J 1 Vh 2 3 6 2 IS 75 18 j 5 4 7 tl 3 2 18 4J 22 6 6 - ) 5 J IO 3 2 21 Si ]8 ~ a 9aun an Crane Teehmeal Pagr Yi 410. Far sl umu, i n - g.)a9 m. , ,,,- „ __, __-,_ _ __ _ ... n . a ~..A..rMmr d :n. f Fannr avatlaM1b ro rh! vrmru.l Ikl the remaining piping shall be sized the same a5 the piping to she farthest sprit kla unless smaller sizes are Justified by calculations. Exrepnonr For tpnnkleredc wettings manufacrured oBnre. :hr mmlmgm presure needE d ro safisJy the ryrtem design aueno an the sysrem nde of r 5e meter shall be specified an a dqm plate by the manufacnn~r. (Set Srcnon 1-3,) TJM 4J-N4 Pfnwwn laaan • SYnfn Melm Pr fawn !wa (pq Miser Flew (aM) (IMbes) Ig v K 31 N SS *rr id i8 16 ' 4 8 9 13 I 3 7 J b 10 I'h '• 1 1 2 1 l 2 •• •• I 2 3 VOTE. XrWsr pressure loon tpecr13N ry the vuoufrturm mould be used In place of novae fpenaed In rM able. lower Drawn loan may ne ufld wren wlFOnrn1 d.n n pmrrded by na mutt manufrnunr. ' ADOw mwmum med Dow of morn vly muaDk mnen. ..late INO I qr. For 51 l:nru'. I Wm - ).1p5 Umm, I la - Sf.1 mm. H.4 To size piping for systems with an ekvpted tank. pump, or pumµtank combination, determine the. pressure at the water supply outlet and proceed Through stns (c). (e). (gl, (hl. (i), Q), and (k) of 4-0.3. 45 Piping Conflggntioas. Piping configuntions mat be looped, gridded, strasght run, or combinations chorea(. ~H [.ovdon of Sprigklen. Sprioklen shall be installed in all areas. Esaepuon No. l.' Sprinkler moy be omuted firm barh- roomt nor escreding SS sq fr I3.! m') wish nonrombusuble plumbingfixruret. °zccpaon Na. 1: Spit-k!ers ywy N omirted >.om smo/! I closerr where ShrlrasJ dimension does not esreea j/~lOv m/ I and the ana does nal exceed 11 sq ff !1.1 mrJ and l he walls and ceilinggr are surfoerd wish nouombusnblr or limlud combupiblr maferialt as defined by NFP,1 110, Standard un Typrt oJBuilding Corftfrucrion, wwgrr. Mt, Ezttpnon No. 1: Sprinklers may be omuted Jrom ames. "~f nn aaum I3D-12 :p'STALLATIOV OF SPRINxLER sY5?EMS IN 0\E AND Tv6FAMILT OWeI11NG2 AND MJ9LLE HOMES yawl spacer and other rorccaled spdces that are no[ used or intended for living purposes or storage. Excep(ion T: o. S: Sprinklers may be omitted from envance foyers !ha! are not c5e only means of egress. Chapter 5 Referenced Publir.Iiens 5-1 The Col!owing documents or portion;.thereofarerofer- GnCrrl N'i(h it (Ric <MnAarA anA e6n11 6. CaD mod.. . r Cd pn.. v, the requirements c(this document The edition indicated for each reference is the current edition as of the date of the NFPA issuance of this document. S1.1 NFPA Puhlications. National Firc Prcteclion Asso- ciation, Batterymxrch Park, Quincy, MA (12269. NFPA L'-i 989, Standard far :F.e lnsial!ation efSP~ink(er I Sl'sterns NFP.a 22- is87, Sandard for Water Tank: jor Private Fire Protectior: NFPA 74-1989, Sandard for the lnstai(ation, Mainte- I nonce, and L~'s¢ of Nousehofd Fire Narnirg Eguiament NFPA 220-1985, Standard on Types afBUllding Canstrua Lion. 5-1.2 Other Codes and Standards. 5-].2.1 ANSI Publications. American National Standards 1ns:i;u;a, ;nc.1,SC Bm~;w~y, New 1'a k, N's f00(d. ANSI R; 6,L1975, Cas! lrmr Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fn!(.ngs. Class 25, 115, 250 and 800 ANSI Rlfi i-I nRS Arn llee Al,. o~.. TL..... d...r c .,:.. _ Class 150 and 300 ANS[ AIGA-1985, Cast lrov Tlveaded Fillings, Classes 115 and 250 ANSI B 165-! 981, Pipe r'langes and F'(anged Fittings ANSI A169-1986, Fhctnry-.ifade lirroughi Steel Buu- me!ding Fi f;iryr ANSI B 16.. I -I 980, Forged Sle¢! Finings, Snekcb Weldig and Threaded ANSI H 16.18.198x, Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pres- sure F'i[tings ANSI 816.22-1980, Wrarg/rt Copper arld Copper Alloy Salde.~,7oirt! Pressure Fittings ANSI B: 6.25.1986, Buuwclding Ends .:N'SI 83G.ICM-193>, Welded noel Scandesa Wrought Steel Pipe 5-1.2.2 ASTM Publications. American Society ter Testing and Materials, 1915 Race Street, Philadelphia, P4 19105. ASTM A5J-1987, Stnndnrd Specifimnon for P:'lre, Steel, Bfaek, and Nar-Dipped, ZincCnated Welded and Seanrlcsr S(ee(Prpe ASTM A135.1986, Standard Spectftendnn far Elechio- Resistanre-Welded Steel Pipe ASTM A234-1987, Standard Specification far Piphlg Fia t(ngs of Wrought Carbon Sree(and Alloy Steel jor rWoderate and Elevated Tempemnrres ASTM A795-1985, Specificntian fur Back and Not- Dipped Zinc-Coated Welded and Seamless Stee(Pipe forFire Protection Use ASTM H32-1987, Standard Specy¢a:ion for Solder Meal. 95-5 (Tin-.9mimony-Grade 95TAf ASTM B7i-1981, Standard Speeifualion for Seamless Copper Tube ASTM B88-1986, Standard Specifuation for Seamleu Copper Wafer Tube ASTM B251-1987, Standard Soetification for Genera( ;Rrrl,,r;.e..,e,.y !. „w,,ough; Star-.;er, Capper ur.u Copper- Allay 746e ASTM E380-1986, Standard far ,V.eiric Practice. 5-],2.3 AWS Publication. American Welding Society, 550 NW LeJeune Road, Miami, FL 33135. AWS AS.d-1981, Spenfsation for Brazing Filler ,N¢ml. Appendix A TAI+Appr d,x is nor a par; o/the rrquirsmenu aJrNr NFPA dxumenl, but u fndud<d/or information pu ~m only. A-1-1 NFPA 13D is appropriate (or the protection against fire hazards only in one- avd two-family dwellings and mobile homes. Residential portions of any other building may be protected with residential sprinklers iv accordance with 3-1 t.^..9 of NFPA 13-1989, Standad for the /ns/alla- tian of Sprinkler Systems. Other portions of such buildings should be protected in accordance with NFPA 13. Thr rnirna :n rh{..re.,de.d ..... ,.---v -_ n.., ._. tests of rooms containing typist furnishings found in residential living rooms, kitchens, and bedrooms. The fur- nishings were arranged as typically found in dwelling units in a manner similar to that shown in Figures A-I-1(a), (b), and (c). Sixty full-scale fire tests were conducted in a two-story dwelling iv Los Angeles, California and l6 tests were conducted in a 14-ft (4.3-mm) wide mobile home in Charlotte, North Carolina. Sprinkler systems designed and insmlled accgding to this standard are expected to prevent flashover within the compartment oforigin if sprinklers are installed in the compartment. A sprinkler system designed and installed according to this standard cannot, however, be completely expected to control a fire involving unusually higher average fuel loads than typical for dwelling units [IO psl (0.7 bar)J and where the interior finish haz an unusually high flame spread rating (greater than 225). .P-Or mlrrl,'n of m„Itifamily A..rall: gt - i PA i 3, Standard jor the Insrai(ation of Sprinkler Sys(ems, or NFPA 13A, Standard fur the lnstalfation af.Sprinkler Syr- iemr in Residemiaf Occupancier up to Faur Storier in Neight. A-1-2 Levels of Protection. Various levels of firesafety are available to dwelling occupants to provide life safety and properly protection. This standard recommends, but does not require, sprin- klering ofall areas in a dwelling; it permits sprinklers to be omitted in certain areas. These areaz are the ones shown by NFPA statistics (see Table A-1-1(aJJ to be the ones where the tees rams., // n I1D-U aeapom JK Igmran C Cnav Sprnkler 0 BM CN Cwu~nr NB NuE OwlC D Drmxr N NpntSU~p CN Cneu L Lamp For 51 L'nn s: I rn. ~ 25 < mm. Fiiure Ad-1 (p BNrwm. 4mn9room Moore Nome eeeroom N i9n ES:Ke G~3 5-504 C-Cbv E - Entl Teble C1N • Connor L-lamp Q-S3bllnkle! Foe 51 Umb: I In, a 33.1 mm. dime A•1•H<3 Urlq Room. f I9nmm~ O $pllnkmf ClN Cu rmin+ D Dra+Or C GIVI 8 Bb Pos 33 Umtx I in. - 33.1 mm. FIEme A-1-1(E) Mehlk Home Bedroom. 13D-14 INS?ALIwTION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN OyP. ANO lW0.FAMILY DNEWNGS AND MOBRE NOMFS incidence of lift loss from fires in dwellings is low. Such an Guidance for installation of smoke detectors and hre approach produces a reasonable degree of firesafety. Great- detection systems may be (onnd in NFPA 74, Standard for tr protection to both life and property will be achmved by the Inttaffa[ion, Mninlenance, and Use of Household Fire sprinklering all areas. Warning Cquipment. , Tvble A-I-2(v} Causal Favors ip One- and Two-Family Dwelling Fires Wbich Caused One or More Deatbs Area of Origin Farm of H<at of Ignition Living ROCrr. 41% Smoking Mztcrials 76% Bedroom Z1% Heat from Fuci-:;rc° >s% IOrchen 15% Powe[ed Objetl Storage Area Y% Based on 6066 incidents Heas from Mssceilaneous I S% Based on 50i6 incidents Hca;ing Equipment Room i% where area of origin was Open Flame (Including where Corm of near of Structural :\rw '% mported MascF.) Ignition waz [eporsed Other Areas 8% Heat from Electrical 14% Equipment Areing er Fo^n of Sia;erial Ignited Overload Fumiturc Z7% Hal Objets Including 7% Bedding IB% Properly OFecating Combmtiblc Liquid or Gas Ii% Electrical Equipment Interior Finish 9% Based on 5080 incidents Other 3% Stnectunl Member 9% where form of maurial Total cumber of incidents Waslq Rubbish 4% ignited was reported reported Clothing, on a Persou J% 10,194 Cooking Matcria!s 3% Electrical lnsulauon 2% furtains, Drapery 3% , Other 10% -ovrca i IDD Cma Pam 19i) to ;9BZ, NFPA Kre Analysis Department. Table A-1-2(b) avow ......-.. ^a Tw,.Fvmilr Dwellings and Mob{le Homes Annual Averages Fire5~544,000 Area of Origin (901 Code) Civilian DcHhs-3,900 Percentages by Area o(Origin Cirilivn Inluries-14,100 Civilian Deaths Used for Ranking} Fires Civility Injuries Living room. den, lounge (14{ 0 1!.b 21.9 Bedroom {Z'.-Z2j 24,1 11.5 20.9 Kitchen {24) 15.0 26.6 Zi.S Strocural Area (70-?9) S.8 IS,S T,4 (Craw!spa<e {7I)J (L5) l12} (Z,9) (Unspcclfiod {79)] (LO) (LOj (0.1) (Balcony. porch {n)J fG.9) (1.1) (0.9} {CeilinglPlcor assembly (73)) (O,il (0.g) (0,6) {Cmling/ROOt assembly (74)) (Ob} ('.3) (0.7j [Wall assembly (i5)) ;O.G) (2.0) (0.8} Dining roam (23) Mcatine cuu~F~•tcs r^^m !6Z! Z.3 1.9 L 1 37 Lb 3.6 Bathro6m (26) 1.7 " 1,9 Hallway, corridor (Olj 12 " 1.1 Intenor stmrway {03) Lp 0.4 0.4 Closet (42) 0.9 1.2 1.3 Other known single area 4,1 26.6 7.5 jChimney (51 )) (0,4) (18.9) (0.7) Multiple areas (97) 0.8 0.7 0.6 Undessified, not applicable (98-99) I.J 1.0 0.6 Total. IOO,G 100.0 100.0 Does not include dwdline Haven ended u property type, which iu ler{e aumMr. ,MY Edlbn // ~{' ePPE~nIt ~ A-I-1 System control valves should be of the indicating t. p<. such as ph:g valves. ball valves. bunergy valves, or O.S. & Y" gate valves. A-IJ The :csponstbdhy (or properly maintaminga sprin- kler s)s«m is .he obligation o(rhe owner or manager who shouid understand the sprinkler system operation. A mini- mum monthly maintenance proe:am should include she ioliouing. lal visualh ~.nspect ali sprinklers ro ensure against ob- stracton of spray. Ibl inspect all valves to assure that they are open. iv Tc>i v ware; Gvw devivn>. Idl The alarm stem, Ifinstalled, should be tested. ]'OTF'. when n appears LkeW than she rev will resuh in a response or the fire department. nouficar;on m me fire departmcm shou;d be made prorro the test, (el Pumps. where employed. should be operated. (See ?'fP.~l '0. Srendard (or the lnsra//anon of Cennrfugal Fire Purnps.l If) The pressure o(air used with dry systems should be checked, Ig) Water level m tanks should be checked. (hl Care should be taken to see that sprinklers are not painted euher at the time o(installation or during subse- quem redecoration. When paining s?nnkler piping or paimmg in aras next to sprinklers, the sprinklers may be protected by covering with a bag which should be removed immediamly after painting has been finished. i i! For funhcr information see VFP.A i:>A. Hrmmmend- rd P.a<nce for rNe lntpecuon, Testing and .Namrenance aJ" Sprmk(er Srttems. -. . aymc >ruunius u .. K, temperature raring, and orifice size used m the system should be kept on the oremises. When (uud sprinklers are replaced by the owner, fire department. or others, care should be taken to assure that th<replacement sprinkler has the same operating characteristics. rv wager Main Grv Gam Va~w ro Jon'esnc ~svvem ~iam_ n,rms va~.ern onmae:~e wnv snw-art R,.noer =acee Mrer Cnttk Va~ve vreiSUre Gage Valve waver Flow Oran aria Ta; Oetecinr Connea•on F-("}a-Gressure Gage To na:omar~,c sor~nx'.e, svsrem Figure A-231x) Prc(enble .A«angtm<nr. Waver Main Cnv Care V ame Convm vane 'RubberFxetl iORtwn Water Check vane Reference ]~Lt. Memr Eneepuan Nc. 11 Pretmn, Gaee Gomesr"c snw-c!• ,'Naler Flpw Vawe ora~n aria Tear Ga;Kror Connecnon vressure Gage ~~ To nmomanc To oomesem swmxier 1 svvem svnem Figure A-13161 Accepub7e Amngemenr. A-1-$.La Testing of a system can be accomplished by filling ;hc system wnh water and checking visually for leakage a1 each /Dint or coupling. Fi re department connections are not «quired for systems covered by this standard, but ntny be installed at the drscretipn o! the owner. In then cases hvCrostatic tests m accordance with NFPA 17, Standard/or ilia /nAallauon of Sprmklrr Scnems, are reyuircd. Dry systems should also be tested by placing the system under an pressure. Any I<ak that results m a drop in system rich i ri iarir rl,an l pal In I d Fari ~~~ t.f Friars ahpti!A „~ <orrected.•Chcck far leaks using soapy water brushed on each /ornt or coupling. Leaks will be shown by the preunce e(bubbles. This «st should be made prior m concealing of p~pmg. A-T3 Connection for fire protection to city mains is often sub/act Io local regulation conc<mmg metering and back- Oow prcv<nnon regmrements. Preferred and acceptable water supply arrangements are shown in Figures A-241a) (bl. and Icl. When a meter must be used betwern the en/ //~ Water Main Cny care Valve wamr flow waur Oae<mr sonnxler Men vressure Gage Convol valve Mom COnna IOn::cn PeM1rence 'vale rrr mvnmaw4 3a t 1 Eueouon r_ ^-o^.,..- 5onnxl9rsv¢em Na n svs:em ~ t rime,,: vressure Gage swr-ors Cn~n aria Tint varve Canneaion •Rubberfxen Cnxx Vawe 'Rubber fxetl CnxF Vawes Oonons figure Ad31N AaxrylJk drtanlemenl. D19 f rro 13D-16 IySTALUTION OF wamr main and the sprinkler system supply, an acceptable arrangement is showm in Figure A-2-2(cj. Under these circumstances, the flow charaderistirs oCth< meter must be included in the hydraulic calculation of the system. [See Table 4-4.3%dJ.] When a tack is used for both domestic and fire protection purposes, a low wzter alarm actuated when the water level falls below I10 percent of the minimum quzntiry specified in Section 2-7 should be provided. A-2-3(a) In dwellings where long-term use oC lawn sprin- klers is common, provision should be made for such usage. A-}5.6.1 Decorative painting o(a residential sprinkler is not to be confused with the temperature identification colors as referenced in 3.11.6 of NPPA i 3-1989, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Sytremt. A-3.6 Alarms should be ofsufficien[ intensity to be clearly audible in al: bedrooms over background noise levels with all intervening doors closed. The tests of audibility level shonld be conducted with all household equipment that may be in operatior. at night in full operation. Example of such equipment are window air conditioners and room Te Spnnkbn To plumhinq 5pwm Common aMiMl.rRlumbiM Conmetion: AEE %umpinp Oem..rA rO Sp'rnknr D.m.M ro Cevmim Aw. 'r quill Men -~ Fi¢ure A-2-3fx1. --- Combm.E gipinq Sprinkler piping % 5pnnkler wn x Lninp Poem Gr,E Hari tsea eampn TWVFAMILT DWELLINGS AND MOBILE HOMES humidifiers. When o6 premise alarms arc provided, at leas[ water flow and control valve positlm shoed be monitored. A-41.2 It is intended that the design area is to include the two adjacent sprinklers producing the greatest water de- mand within the compartment. Il is also intended that the number ofdesign sprinklers is limited to a maximum of two sprimklers even if there are mor<Ihan two sprinklers in the compartment, except as noted in A-0-2.3. A-44.3 Fire testing has indicated the need to we[ walls in +h< ^ M-d by residca:ia: cep ak:< ; a: a - dose: to the ailing than that accomplished by standard sprinkler distribution. Where beams, light fixtures, sloped aihngs, and other obstructions pour, additional residential sprin- klers will be necessary to achieve proper response and distribution. In addition, far sloped ceilings, higher flow ra:es may be needed. Guidance.may be obtained fwm the manufacturer. A series of 33 full-scale tcsu were mcently wmducfed in a test room of 12 ft x 24 tt (3.6 m x 7.2 m) poor area to determine the efkct of cathedral (sloped) and/or beamed ceiling construction on fast response residential sprinkler Ptltl Dwnglic Dnwry Iw La rtlry to SprinY.r DmuM W Dnmmim 5eirry ~~ Tn SFrinklm YGn. Supply-~ To LFuMry fi.rvm Fi¢arc A-2-Vh1. x eeerwm i__.__._ _______x aeeroom x 7 i eanrrom e.m Dimns aw x xngn.n i J ni cwn BrtM1 -- / z La.nery C/ -~ - L.urtlry % Furn.w goom X Can. goom FI¢ure A4.3(c). ~~ b raeE~014 ~ - a m~e~ -zva..ml ~.~ ~~~-~ r,e„Ixm ma L,~m oros+ -~ L a mm Fiqure AJ-111x7 SDrinkler Design {teas far Typical Residemid Occupancy. Lble Ad.2J )Lximum Distance from Spinkler Degecmr Io Bottum of Cailivg Ubatmmian ]laximum Disnn<e from SDrinkler Denecror Dishnce from Sprinkler to Bottom of io Side of Ceiling Obsrcunion Ceiling Obsuuctian Less than 6 m Vat permated 6 m. is less than I h J In. 1 R to less than '_ h I m. '_ ft m lea than ] R 61n. _ m. _ Fs 6 m. m less }flan 7 ([ J In. l (r rn 1~.. ,A..., lf!A~.. J... 3 ft 6 in. Eo Icu than d R b m. d Rro less thandit Sin. ~m d R 6 in. ro less than 5 ft 9 In 5 ft m Icss :han S R 61n. I l u 5 fi fi In. m Ivss than 6 ft IJ In O~n~M KivAm /~M~nr~a. T~mml n~Ll~ Min 0.n l}O]mml L,nPl not e^n iiY` / Figure A-41.3(6) Sprinkler [ksign Aran for TYpial Residential 0ttupancY. performance. Th< msung was binned to one pendent-type residental sprinkler model two ceiling slopes 10 and 14 .......~ .... ~...., A.......,,.. a.....,.:.. _...., a._ .:....i_ _..,.L. _.n...-.. _.._ .-_....-....e-. _.._............,.P- ...... sure size. In order to lodge the effectiveness o(spnnklers in :umro!hng fires. two base line tests. in whwh the ceiling was smooth and horizontal. were conducted with the pendent sprinklers ms}alleo and with a total water supply o(26 gpm f98 L/mm1 as regmred 6y VFPA 13D. The results of the base I Inc rests were compared with tests In which the ceiling was beamed and/or sloped and two pendent sprinklers were Installed with the same water supply. finder the limited condmons msted, the comparison indicates that sloped and/or beamed ceilings repr<xnt a serious challenge to the fire protection afforded by faze rcsponx residential sprin- k lets. However further tests with beamed ceilings indicated real fire control equivalent to that obtained in the base line re5ls may be obtained i(one sprinkler is centered in each bay formed by the beams and a total wa¢r supply of 76 gpm i U5 Liminl is available Firc control equivalent to that obtained in the baxline tests waz obtained for the smooth .I.. .,.4.'n hie: ..- :_-.-ii-a ..,pe..::L ag lets .. ;pnrrkkr, .. wnh a trial water supply of 34 gpm IZ00 /mml.~ln a+single smoldering-started fire Iesl, the fire was suppr<sxd,' A4-J.J.3 Antifreeze solutons may be uxd for maintain- ing automatic sprinkler prolecnon in small unheated areas, ' EB:CIa o! Cathedral and Bnmed Cedln{ Construrnon on Residential Sprinkler Performance. FMRC / 8 M7NS.RAf 31. by Blii )r. R.G. Kun{. ~-C. Brown. W 0... and F1dl, E., prepared for U.3. Frte Admmuvallon IFeb. 19881. // 7 For 51 L'mu: I m. - E5.6 mm'. I h ~ O.JOa9 m Cef rig Not ro Emcee Manmum Permined Isee 6-11 antl f ~ d-221 ~_~=~ . MaK~mum Distance o<rlecml anon I eortom of Ceding Onflruman ' 01 Cmi~~g Obstruct on ' Figure A-43.J Paslllov of DeBectm. Cprigar or Penden4 \1'hen ........................ ,..... 6., ~.,.........r. Aril: (reeve solutions are recommended only for ss stems not <aceedmg 40 gallons (131 U. Becaux of the cost of refilling the system or replenishing small leaks, it is advisable to use small dry valves where more than 40 gallons (131 LI are to be supplied, Propylene glycol or other suitable material may be used as a substitute for priming water, to prmrnt evaporation of the priming Ruid, and thus reduce Inc formation within the system. A-4J.J.l.J Beyond rennin limits. increased proportmn of antifreeze does not lower the freezing point of solution. ISeE• Figure d-4-J. d.l. J.) Glycerine, diethyl<ne glycol. ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol should ne•er b< used without i mi+ing with water i!i p rortians. becau<_e these I materials lend to thicken neat 71-F 10-C'1. A~1•J.3./ To avoid leakage, the materials and workman- ship should be eacell<nt, the threads clean and sharp. and the joints tight. Ux only metaLfaced valves. AI-J.J.3 Tests should be made by drawmga sample of the solution from valve B two or three Umes during the freezing uason, esyecially if it haz been necessar> to drain the building sprinkler system for repairs, changes. etc A small hydrometer should be used so That a small sample will he IEEE Ea~¢• 13D-1 B INSrALtATION OF SPRINI(LER STSiFMS IN ONE AND TWFAMILT DWF11N(is ARD MUBIIP NOMFS V o` E 0 -lp ~ > + zo y` - .3p P hL P 1 eP ~ l .qp C °o r o -50 -6p I -00 - ~_ -- -VPercens BT VoM1:me,V VV -V ~VV Figure A-s-3.3.3.3 Freezing Poinb of N'vhr Solutions of Ethylene Glycol and Diethyleoe GlYtol. sufficient. When water appears at valve B o: when the test sample indicates that the solution has become weaktned, empty the entire system and recharge as previously de- scribed. A-0-4.3 Determination of public water supply pressure should take into account probable minimum pressure con- ditionprevailing during such periods as at night, or during summer months when heavy usage may occur', also, the possihilily of interruption by floods, or ice condiGDns in wiener 32 Indiridusl Nu Loss ToW t< a. Water Pressure in Strcet,_ b. Arbivarily $elut Pipe Siu O ' c. Deduq Meter Loss (__ Siu~_ __ d. Deduct Head Loss for Elevation 22 o System Control Valve' (-fit x 0.434) 40 ~ c. DcduM Pressure loss from City Main to Sprinkler ._ 58 n -Pipe- .ft r -Naives- __Q ]6 ~ -~Ibows- R _Tcc- rt 9a Total- rt x __ _ ___ L D<duct Pressure Loss (or Piping-Control Valve to Farthest Sprinkler' Toml Equiv, Size Quan. Drscriprion Feet 90' Gbow _ 45' EI'duw _ Tee __ - Check Valve ._ Valve(-) __ Total A x _ _ _ _ Total Equiv. Siu Quan. Description Fut 90' Elbow __ 45' Elbow -__ Tee Check V:1vu _ Valve(-) Total FI x _ _ _ _ Remeinin¢ Pressure (ar Sprinkler (r,vrntinn 'F-Onrt tram Tbin 44J(aJ, (bl, kl , uid (d). For 8i Uniu: I 0 - 0.30aa m: I psi - O.Oda9 bar. Figure A-d-0.3(1) Calculvlion Sheet. IBdlvidusl Net Lass Toml Water Pressure at Supply Outlet a. Deduct Head loss for Elevation (-ft x 0.434) -- b, peduct Pressure Loss from Piping Within-, Building' Itemeining Pressure for Sprinkler Operetion 'Futon from Tables M,3(s), (b), (c), end (d). For 8s Uniu: I fr ~ oJ04g m; 1 pd - O.O6B9 bar. Figun A-4-0,3(2) Gslvlstfov Sheet - EIen1M TYok, Boostu Pump, Pump Tsvk Supply, Illl attlon /! v Appendix B Referenttd PuDlicgtions 8-1 The following documents or portions thereof ate refzrnced wuhin this ssendarC for informational purposes only and shin are not consltlered part o(she requirements of this docu meas. The edition indicated for each «ference is she currem etlvion as of she Case of the V FPA issuance of this document. 8-1.1 \FPA Publications. National Fire protection Asso- clazion. Battery march Park. Quincy, MA 0?]69. I\DE un-Iv NF'P.4 I3 1989. Standard for the (nstallaucn ql SpnnAdrr SJ'rtrmr NFPq 17A-1987. Recommended Prartme%or the (nspec- uon, Ternng and lfpmtenanre oJ'Sprinkter S,psremr NFPA 13R-1989. Sandard for the InAa(lanon uJ Sprin- kler S,enemr to Rerrdenua(Orrupannes up to Four Stmlrr rn Height NFPA ~0-1487, Standard%r the Innallapon of Crntnl~- gal Fire Almps NFPA 71-1489. Sandard jor the Insratlation..L/ainte- naner, and L'se of Hourehold Fire Rarrtmg Egwpment. [neat U 19p9 NavOnal Firc P<01<cllu0 A+KKU110n all rq)hn r«rnd, IDe <Opr'npm m Inn :nd<s n u panm and dimna Iran IK mpvnNl In rM dacumem xnl<h n Indeaea Tln l¢elump pmr:xolu ur ronh r%Ilu decumev rr< I apphoek Io :hn m0ea in n :nd<z may n% O<¢produ«d In xhol<or m qn M+nr mnn+xnrom Ille ezpr<u xrmm~ permmmn of IM 9alm%1 fir< Pm¢rnun mao<nucn In< q. ,J, Alarm, wal<rnaw J.t, i. ).5 IruunMbn.,, ..Y.<Deslpn ind lnll]IId110n u[na:rc.-. 1.1 A111IfIe[x< .olu::om i-J.1 TabIO 0.1.]11.311. .~- AdJ.aI Sw<ms ~ oenmuon +-J.J1 Jolnu, 1Je c• M Componevu, ryvem, Chap,J ~annea.o0s. to maim, A~J~J, F:p. A~bZ la lhrv d D- De+lan and lmuWden .,. .. IJ. A~bS Deaf and mueml+. LS I. A-IJJ S.n<m ..Chap. a, b1 Cntm] aLA-41 oatlad dlacaary[ . s[e Dluhua<. dnlyl oalsoor, xareAow Dehmuon i.l . ~ munary[, dnlna . 41.1 Defiml n o rn:w i-I ory mum ai z Defimlmn IJ nxewoa tkhmuon. IJ pwell[na IrWI Definnlon IJ F• llnlnV )J 5. 1J>. Table IJS M[Inunllna .i. 1.LA Meupremml ., f«linnt Of m<asur<m<nt MOafle Yom<. :.i Defimnon. Id -P- INplna.. ., ., 1.1 ConANnuom .... ., n5 Malenalund dimennon+, Table J-) i 53nN dL. .... H.T~Aks Hila lhru dl. A-].a SnLgens.. ., ' , I r:imnupgy, arnnpemens of . i.) h A.1.J.5. Fia. A•1-) } MOIn~ nlnled MulupuryoM ...,.., .. . SJ.>4.7 Deamhop ..... ...... . h[ea M .. bl pMZ +IMSru D[Amuop...,.... I]sana l.I n wpplr [kamuop,.. ....., ., ~.: Sv+1e111 ~ RAmnon F<eaanrt ~Y[P... . . /l9 nM F]+a 13D-20 ItiSTALLCFION OF SPRINKLER SY51'F.MS IN ON& AND TW0.FAMILY DWEWNGS AND MOBILE NOMFS emualon, ICwls of ........... ........ . .. .. .. .. .... . .A-I-2, .T- Tables n-I~i (a and b) Pump Dcfinilion ....... ........... ........ . .. .... ..... .. .. .I-J TWtlnp ..,...................... ... . .. .1.5.1.4. 0.3.6. A.1.5.1.4. Purpose oESUndud .......... ... ....... .. .. .. .... ..42, Ad-2 A+2d,A+7.6 D. S (lulu o(mcamttment ......... .. .. ... . .. ...... .. ..... ....1-6 V- scope of sdndard .. .. .. .. . ....... .. .. .. .. ... I-1,A-I-I Eprlakltt systems Components .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . .... .ChaP.3 Dcfinilion ................. .... ... ... .. . .. .. .. . ...... ..IJ SprN4lers Al10 ma110 Pcfiniban ... ... ... .. ... .. ... .. .. I-0 Cownge .. ... .. .. .. ... .......... .................41.4 DraiBn and imtallalion . .. .. ... ... ... .. .. .. ...... ... J-5 lonrion of .................. .. .... .. . . .. .. .. .. .... . .. .4F Paining and omamrntel finahcs .. . .. .... . . .. ... .. .35.6, A3.5.6 Position of ................. .. .. ..... . .. ... .. . ...4.2. A.4.2 Ruid<mul Definiton ...,....._ .... . .. . .. .. . ... .. .. .. . .... ....I-i 5[andaed Definition ................. .. . .. .. ... .. . .. .. .. . .... .. ..I-3 Ysivrs ....................... ... ... .. ... .. .. ....... ... J-1 Cha:: Covaml Dcfinilion ................. ... ... .. ... .. .. ..... .1.3, A.1.3 Supply, arnn8emcnt of .... ... ........ .0.3.5, A.4J.5, Fy.Ab3.5 W R4ttc demand .. ...... .. .. ......... ....................41.3 Rtter auPPIY ................ . ... .. ... .. ....... ... ...Ch:p.2 GmW Provisions ........... .... . .... ... .. ... ...... ....2-I Mobile home ............... .... . .. .. ... ..... ..........2J Sources ...................... .. ........ ... .. ... .Z-2, A.2-2 wkt q+t® .. .. .. .._ ..... ........ ....................43.1 Definition ................. . ..... .. ... ...... ....... ... .1-7 1N1 EPYan / CopYnBht C 1999 NFPA. All Rights ¢cv:n~atl NFPA I7R Standtrd for the IRShllRtlou of Sprio~ler Systems iR Residentlad Occupancies op [o Four Stories in Height 1989 Edidoo This edition of NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems !n Residenna( Occupancies up ro Four Smiles in Heigh4 was prepared by the Technical Committtt on Automatic Sprinklers, releaxd by the Corrcleting Committee on Water Ex[ivguishi¢g Syuems, and amed on by the National Firc Protection Assoeiatioa, Inc. at its Fall Meeting held November 1417, 1988 in Nashville, Tennessee. It was issued by the Standuds Couvdl on January 13, 1989, with an effective date of Februuy 6, 1989. The 1989 edition of Wis nandard has been approved by the Ameriwo National Standudx institute. OHa4 and Desebpmeat of NFPA IlR NFPA 13R rcprexnu a milgmne in Ws development of sprinkler i¢sWlation design standards. This first edition e¢Iwmpwes a combined effort of W< 8re protection mmmuaity to develop a staada[d for the protection of low•rix, rnid<ntYai fadlities. This sundard is i¢twded to providt a higher degrtt of lite safety and propetiy protemtoo to the inhabitants of low•Hx, mulu6mily dwelli¢gs. Promulpted as a document whic4 provides for iucreaxd levels of protection m building occupants, the doNmeas uas ua., ...:.::::-_ ••- -^~•~ml• aanects oP a sprinklerad farility as compared to an unsprinklercd 4citiry. As the number of s4tn aad does that implement spH¢kler ordimnm continues to grow, it is felt Was systems for cettain rcsidsatial ocwpwcies can be elLciendy and <Bettiv<ly iasWled is aocotdana wiW this sta¢dud. This document wilt provide requircme¢ts on system deign which n¢ge from water supplies to hardware sehxtion ro positioning a¢d location of automatic spdoklen. 13R-1 ~-r +wswa, lad 13R-2 INSInLLA?ION OF gPNnKIFA SYSTEMS IN RFSIDFJtf1AL OCCDPANCIFS VP t0 FOUN SmRIF51N HEIGHT Committee on Rater Extinguishing Systems Correlating Committre Ad D. Smith, Gvirman Gagreabmek h A4wnnn inc. Robert L Sobmo4 Srcrrrary National Fire Pro~egivv Azsociaticn INwvotinp Wvyne E. Auq Rolt lem:n & Auotinn loc. Thamn J. Hrowo Jr_ Fanory Mutual Remarch Corp. Casimir J. DDBn Jr, M8M ProtMioo Consulnvts RINW Mvnvnµ Mid Hudson Aulvmalic Sprin- kler Coy. Robert H Men. Moorezlowa, Nl Jams W. Nolaq ]vmd W. Nan Co. Cbnter W. Schirmer, Schirmer Eogivarin4 Corp. Trehninl Committee oR Automafte Sprinklers Chdmr W. Srhismu, CMirman Schirmer FsNVeerin6 Core. Slepbea 0. Haanr, Serrnury Kempd Group (Alswme to H. Wivchelp Edwud C. Baw4 Dept. of Publi< Ssfdy Rep. FMANA Charm B. Bw<Ip Automatic Sprinklm Cory. of America Rep. NFSA Albert M. Camly, l., Cunia Coa Kennedy R<p nu TTomm G. DJy, Hilton Hosds Corp, Rcp, ANMA Jobo 4 Mkc4 Unicn Carbide Cosp. Rep. NFPA IFPS lee J. Doaedlo, Gnderwriten IsbonWnd Inc. Jamn R. DonlinL Nvtl. Ann. of Hnm< Ruid<d (Vote Limiud Iv UD and 13R) Robert E. Wkq Fin Control inc. Ruben J, CnY, Fire Spec., Inc. Rcp..AFSA W. Dmid Hilbv, Cobb County Firc D<pl. Rcp, IAFC mchard E. Hughry, ISO Commercial Risk Services Rolr H. Jenuq Roif lenun h Asmcbsd Inc. Knn<rh W. Lindy IndusWal Risk Insunn e. J. takes, Grinnell Firc Protediov System Co. 4d. Wayne M. Martlq loa AvgrJn GtY Fire Dept. Jobe G. OT`wl4 GagrBabmck 6 Aswdatd Ivc. J. K Ridudaoq Natl. Rmeu<h CovvcR of Gvada E. J. Sr81H4aea, Fafsmav Kodak G. J.'Ibm Smisq VS Fiu Admivimnnon fVOIC LimisW m 13D and 13R) Willie R. empRq Amen.... Amoma4c Spriakkr, Ivc. ReP. AFSA Wllliw t.'fata, Gdvvtll Firt Prob Synema Co. Inc Rep. NFSA Jobv J. Walsh, Uuud AMV. of loumaymev A Ap- przvfim o(0e Pl.w.birng R Pipe tittlvg lad, of Ne US & Gvada WIIWm D. WUbq Center for Fin IlveamJ, Wlllkm R, WBmq F~clory Muscat Rcanrch Cory. Harty R Wlachel4 lihdty Mutual losurovtt Co. Rep. MI R, J, Wright, UvdersMSen Lbontorid of Canada D. M. Yule, ICI America bc. Rcp. NFPA iFPS tents H. ]'mmdmaa4 Addphia Ausommic Sprio- kid Cc. O. !iF]A ,ggg 4JWn / za coMMITiEE Alrerum Rvpr L A14re. Fanory Mulual 0.nearth Cory. IAlmmae tv W. E Wllmal Doe E. Dom Dow CACmlml Co. j Alkmare In 1. L. DeRool TvmmY E. Ephal. Indmmal Rnk Irourcn IAlkmme to K, w Lmdal Dnie D. Enea, Cenur for Fire Rruarch nnem+u tv x' D, W<honl Rmarll P. Fkmivp p'ml. fire Spnnkkr Asan. iAlemal<ra W, Tnk) GaarEe E. fsri<k L'ndrrwncn LaWrmonm Inc. IARcmnc m L. 1. IwsNbl Edwue R. Wlay Und<rwnren Labomlonm v( Canada IAlternele m R. J WnNrl Cvroll v. Ierem Xcma Cory I Al:emnc ro D M. Yulul RaynmN D. Malb•. nmman Flre Spnnkler now. Inltemae to R. J. Gray) 1. R. Mnbinaq, Natl. 0.euarcM1 Leuncd IAB<mllr tv 1. K. Ranardwnl }loon AI, Alavell. Muwdl k L:Brelon Archnwk ',Alkmart lel G. G'N<IIII Fr<vcis J. Nltbria4 Eulman KNat Co. IAII<mal[ to E. 1. XMBhau<n Jaagb G. ?ant S Pmdev Fir< Depn UIl<mak m E. G Ba<onl Gmle w. D'Ewrk<. ScMrm<r En4nannE Cory. IAllemM<la C. W. Schlwrrl Janes Wvb1E The vikint Corp, IAI¢mnc lvC BamnO NM Sdn. lad. Asses. of Fin Chrtfs Jeck Tke[W. Klan Aummauc Spnnkler Co. (A!kmare m L. 2imm<wanvl Jail vrakeM, Tile Shenron Corp. IAltemarc to T. G. DalYl Jobe F. vblA MFP SPnnkler, fn<. IAlmmuc to W. T<mplinl WiWu A. WeIA Rolflmkn d: Assauln Inc. qll<mm<to R. H. Jevuvl Nn<or14 EInW E. BNakL Hubhn Assw W Wfm E. Ko1FL KoRel Asra. Rep. Cammm« on Safety m 4fe Bury M. Lan WomuM Fin Bynems Spbcomminet DD Re.idenliEi OccapallcieE JeM G. O'Nglt CAauman :..p-~..~.~.. s naau.nln Inc. Edeare K, W aicl HuEAm Asses. Lyd E. CuFM14 Relkbk nmomauc Bprivtler Co ln:. Jwr R. Dpwllq, Nnl, Auv, of Nome Bmlden Elrkare E. HeEMY, ISO Commerral Rlrk S<mca 141Pb Jr'tmn, Albkte lvsunva Cv. W W{A<q C4 Frnry Mmwl Reuueh Carp, C.gEr E. IAwrkY. Und<rwnten Labormonm Ivc. Elden E. SoklrraR NRA Sled Lnimn Oevalr fueerN4 Marykvd Flrc Egmpmcm Corpo- nnov J. K. RIAU1aea Fin Pvuu<A Counni o(Canrda XmrY SYu, Iml. Auv. u( Firc Chlcfs J. Tv. SmItE, US Firc Admmnwvon WIBfu L True. Grinvnl Fite Protunon Spkms Co. Inc. WllBU TWU. I(empcr Grwp WIBW A. 11kk1. Rolf lemev avd Aria. Ive. Thu !ur npnuw rAr mrmMnhm ar rAe nmr the Lammiuet wu AWlarrd on rM vxl o/rAu Mumn. Smcr IAar ::..-c, c,~xprr:x:fr memJnlA.a mar Aan m<vrlN NOTE: MembeMtp ov a Commnk< sbYi na iv avd of iu<If connilute av endoluem<m of the Asamauov or ray documms dnebped by Wes Camminer ov whiU Ikr member mrva. 13R-3 INl6m<w fa3 13R-4 INSTAIt.~i!ON OF SPRINKLER STST°MS III RFSID£NiW.p,'CUPANC'IFS UP SO FOUR SNRIPS IN NFIGYr ~~ Contenla Preface ....................... ....... .... .. ... ..... .... ... ..13R- 5 Chapterl General lnformatiov ............................... .....13R-5 1.1 Scope .............................................. ... ..13R- 5 1-2 Polpnse .............................. ........ ...... ... ..13R- 5 1-3 Defi¢itio¢s .. ...... ..... ............................ ......13R- 5 I-4 Units .............................. .. .. ... ..... .... .. ...13R- 6 I-5 Piping ............................. ....... ......... .. .. .13R- 6 I-F. System Tvoes ........................................ .....13R- 7 Chapter 2 Worltivg Plays, Design, InstaRatlo¢, Acceptance Tests, a¢d Maintemntt ................................. .....13R- 7 2-1 Working Plans and Acceptance Tests ....................... .....13R- 7 2-2 Design and Installation ................................. .....13R- 9 2-3 Water Supply ............................. ........... .....13R- 9 2-4 System Compo¢c¢ts ...................... .. ..... .. .... .....13R-10 2-5 System Design ....................................... .....13R-1 I 2-6 Location of Sprinklers ................................. .....13R-1 l 2-7 Mai¢te¢ance ........................................ .....13R-I I Chapter J Relere¢ced Publiatio¢s ............................... .13R-12 Appendix A ........................... ... .. .. ... .... .... ... .. .13R-I2 Appeodlz B Referenced Publintio¢s ................................13R-17 Index ................................ ... .. ..... ......... .. .. .13R-18 tsp eam ~~'~ i isi 7 i l GE\ERnL RRO~1510~5 NFPA 13R Standard for the Installefion of Sprinkler Systems in Residential Occupancies up to Four Stories in Height 1989 Edition SOTICE: An as:ensk 1') (ollowivg the number or letter devgnat- mg a paragrapn mmwtes ezpuvamry.natenm oo shat paragraph le gppcndu A. Ivfonns[iov on «fereeceE publ¢atioos cav lK fauvd iv Chapter 7 and .4ppendia B Preface It is intcadcd that this staodard provide a method (or these individuals wishing to instals a sprinkler system (or fife safety and property protection. It is not the purpou of this standard to require the installation of an automatic spnokler system. This standard assumes that one or more smoke detectors wsll lx installed in accordance with NFPA 74, ,Smndard /or the /nsm0arion .Nain(enance. and G'se oJ' Nonsehoid Flre Ishrnrng Equipment. Cbapter 1 G<o<nl Ioformadon ~:1• Scope. This standard deals wish the design and in- s.aliatwn of automatic sprinkler systems for prottcnon against fire hazarAs in residential occupancies up to four .,.,.,... ,~ , ..y,. !-2• Purpose. The purpou of [his standard is to provide desgn and installation requirements (or a spnokler sustain to aid m ih< detection and coolrol of fires in residential occupances nod thus provide improved protection against Injury, life loss. and property damage. A spnokler system d<ngned and installed in accordance w'ilb this standard is <xpec[ed to prevent Oashover (total iovDiv<menp in the room of fire ongin, when sprioklered, and Io improve the chance for occupants to escape or be evuuated. Nothing in this staodard is intrnded to r<stritt new mchnologies or alternate amngements, providing that the I<v<I of safety prexribM by the standard is not lowered. 1-7 Defloitiooa. Approved. Acceptable to the "authority having jurisdic- r~e NOTE. The Vabonil Firc Prot<ctlon Araauiion don not approve, impact or certify anY ivstillatmns, procsdum. egmpmma or materials nor don it approve or evaluam tnuas labontorin. In deermivma the attep40ilily of InsWauom or praedurn, egmpmevt or matenils, We auihanty haviat lurisdipiaa ouy base aeceptance an coin. pliaoce wish NFPA or older appropnam sUVdarN. In the abxece o! such ftandards, sect auNodty m+y squire evi- dence o(proper innillnion, procedure or uu. The awhonsy having lunsdittion may ilsn rt(er to the lining or Iabeima 13R-5 pram¢es of an arganinlson concemed wnh product evalua~ eons whmh v In a poatiov ro demrmiee compliance wnh appropnale standards (or the currant produmion of fisted IICrnS. Authority Haring Jurisdietiov. The "authority having junsdidton" is the organization, oRtce or individual re- sponvble for "approving" equipment, au instillation or a procedure. NOTE, The phrau"authority havlegjunsdirsiov''nuxd m NFPA documrnv m a broad mavner ante lunsdinlovs and "approval" aaenmes vary u do chart mponsibl!ihes. Whert public safey is primary, the "authorry having juns- -- say he a ledui. >lalc, locos or vmer repova department or ivdividuil such v a fire chief, fire marshal. chief of a Ere prcvevtivn bureau, labor department. heilsh dcpartmmt, baildivg o~ciil, electrical inspemot or oshen having susutory amhonty. For immace purpose, an iesur an<e ivspcttiov department, rativg bureau, or other msar av<e mmpavy rcDresevuuve may be she "amhonly baving jusisdimiov." Iv mrny <ucumsuvm me progeny owner or his dnigvated agent usumn the tole of the "authod:y havivg lunsdittiov'"~. as gavemmees imulleions, the tom. mavding o6sar or departmenhl oB~ciil may be the "author isY having judsdiniov." Check Vdre. A valve that allows gow io ooe direcuo¢ only. Control V'dr<. An i¢diceting valve employed to control (shut) a supply of water to a sprinkler system. Deaitgg Discharge. Rate of water discharged by an auto• ma[ic sprinkler, expressed in gallons per minute. Dry Sptem. A system employing automatic sprinklers That are attached to a piping system containing air under atmospheric or higher pressures. Lass of pmsure from the upcuiug of • apt iukmi ur uet4'non or a are cpnnatpn <auus the releax of water into the piping system and out sae opened sprinkler. Dwelling Uoit. One or mere twins arranged for the use o! one or more individuals living together az in a single housekeeping unit, normally having cooking: living. sani- tary, and sleeping facilities. V~Ird. Equipmeot or materials to which has been clinched a label, symbol or ocher identifying mark of an organization accepuble tv the "authority having jurisdic- tion" and cpnccmed with product evaluation. that main- tains penodie inspemion of production of labeled equip- ment or materials and by whoa labeling the manufacturer indiates compliance with appropriate standards or perfor- mance in a specified manner, listed. Equipmeot or materials included in a list pub• lished by an organization atteptable to the "authority having jurisdittion" and concemed with produn evalua- tion, chat maintains periodic inspection of production of listed equipment or materials and whoa listing states either that the equipment or material mttu appropriate standards cr has been tested and found suitable for uu in a specified manner. NOTE: ilia meam (or id<mifyiM listed egmpm<m may vary for och orpmsnion concemed with Draducs evalua. was ea~a J ~5 13R-6 INSrALUTInN nF SPRI4KLE0. SYSEMS VP TO EOUR sioRIFS IN HEIGHT uua, some of which do not recognize equipmem as listed '.miens it is also labeled. The "authority havivs jurisdiction" should milizc the system cmpbycd by she listing organiza- tin;: to idemify a bsszd prodncL Multipurpose Piping Systems. Piping systems within rsdential occupancies intended to serve bath domestic and 5re pro[emion needs. Residential Occupancies. Residential occupancies as in- cluded in the scope of this standard include the following, as defined in NFPl. IOIm, Life Safely Codea: (IJ Apartment buildings. (2) Lodging and rooming houses. (3) Board and rare facilities (slow evacuation type with Ib or less occupants and prompt evacuation typel. (4j Hotels, motels, and dormitories. Residential Sprinkler. An automatic sprinkler that has been specifically listed (or use in residevlial occupancies. Shall. Indicates a mandatory requirement. Should. Invicates a recommendation or that which is advised but not required. Sprinkler-Automatic. Afire suppression device that operates automatically when its heat-actuated element is heated to or above its thermal rating, allowing water to discharge over a specific area, Sprinkler System. An inkgrated system of piping con- vected to a water supply, with listed sprinklers that will aulomatirally initiate water discharge over a fire arcs, .... .. • ,~ywuq u,~ >p,.unn, >Yauu auo u,uuu~> a wuvwt vaP:c and a device for actuating an alarm whey the system operates. Standard. .A document containing onW mandatory pro- ':isions using the word "shall" to indicate requirements. Explanatory material may be included only in the forth of "fine print" notes, in footnotes, or in an sppendix. Waterfiow Alerm. A sounding device activated by a w alerflow detector or alarm check valve. W'aterllow Detector. An electric signaling indicator or alarm check valve actuated 6y water dow in one direction only'. R'et System. A system employing acic:natic sprinkles that are attached to a oivin¢ system containina water and wale, supuiy, w «~al water dscharges immediately from sprinklers opened by a fire. 1-0 Units. Mctnc units of measurement in this standard are in accordance with the modernized metric system known as the International System of Unit; (SI). Two units (liter and bar), outside of but recognized 6y SI, are com- monly used in international fire protection. These units arc listed, with conversion factors, in Table I.4. I-0.I If a value for measurement as given in this standard is (allowed by an equivalent value in other units, the first Table 1-0 Name of Uvit Uvi[ Symbol Covrvrsiov Factor liter L 1 gal = 3.785 L pascal Pa I psi = 6894.757 Pa bar baz f psi = 0.0689 bar bar bar I bar s 105 Pa For atldisioval covversiom avd ivformadev nee ASI'bt E380, SWndord Jar Meviz Mani« staled is to be regarded as the requirement. A given equiva- lent value may be approxrmale. }-0.2 The conversion procedure for the SI units hzs been to multiply the quantity by [he conversion factor and then round the result to the appropriate number of significant digits. 7-5 Piping. 1-5.1 Pipc or tube used in sprinkler systems shall be of the materials in Table I-3.1 or in accordanm with 1-3.2 through 1-3.3. The chemical properties, physical props: ties, and dimensions of the metcrials listed in Table 1-3.1 shall be at Icast equivalent to the smndards cited in the table and designed to withstand a working presstue oC not less than 173 psi (12.1 bars). Table 1-8.1 Materials avd Dimensions 3hndard Specification far Hlack and Hat-Dipped Zinc- Cvatcd (Galvaviudj Wddcd avd Seamless Sted Yipe (or Fire Prno-rtinn IIv aCTM sie< Specification for Welded and Seamless Stcd Pipc ASTM A33 Wrought $(<el Pipe ANSI H}fiJ OM Speeificatior, for Eltctrio-Resisuvn Wdded Steel Pipe ASTM AI33 Copper Tube (Drawn, SeamlusJ Specification for Seamless Copper Tube ASTM 888 Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Capper and Copper- Alloy Tubc ASTM B2il Brazing filler Metal (Classification HCu P-3 or BCuP-4) nW5 A3.8 Specification for Solder Metal, 93-3 (Tin-Antimony-Grade 93TA) ASTM 832 ~.:. Gth~~ ;y pa of pipe .,. wee n,ay bo a> as may those listed for this service. t-5.3 Whenever the word pipe is used in this standard, it shall be understood to also mean tubs. 1-SA Pipejvined with mechanical grooved fittings shall be joined by a listed combination of fittings, gaskets, and grooves. When grooves are cut or rolled on the pipe they shall be dimensionally compatible with We fittings. Exception: Steel pipe with wa(I thickneues less than Sched- ule JO /in sizes 8 m. (103 mmJ and larger) or Schedule 40/in taa9 Edlbn / wongiec vurvs. ofsma trier (eu than 8 m. !107 mm/J sha(1 not 5rfomed by frrttngs used wrth pipe having cur grooves. 1-h.5 Finings used iv sprinkler systems shall b< of the material listed in Table I-5.5 or m acrordan<e wrth I-5.7. The chemical properties, physical properties, and dimen- sions of the materials listed m Table 1.5.5 shall h at leazt equivalent m [h< s[andards tired in the table. Finings used In sprinkler systems shall be designed to withstand the working pressures involved, but not less Shan 175 psi (12.1 bars) cold water pressure. T:SIa t Materials ad Divuvaivm StaedW Cazr Iron Cast Irov threaded Fuungs, Class 125 and 250 .... ........ ... .4N51 816.4 Cott Iron Plpe Flanges aed Flanged Frtuvgs ....... .. ... .. ....... . ANSI Bld.l Malleable iron Malleable Iron Threaded Finivgs. Class 150 avd 700 ....... ........... . ANSI BI6J Sled Factory-made ThrcadeC Finings CIsss ISC and 300 .... ...... ........ . ANSI BId,S Bunweldieg Ends far Pipe, Vilves, Flavaea avd Fittivgt .................. . ANSI BI6.25 Spec. (ar Piping Finmas of Wrought Carbon Steel avd Allvy Steil fo: Y.oCe:ate and Etr:a:ed Temperatures .. .. ............... ASTM A234 Pepe Flavge aed Fanged Fanop. Strol Nickel Alloy avd Otter Specul Alloys . . ANSI B1a.5 rotaen erect rlnmgs, Socket weaved avd Threaded ..... ....... ..... ANSI BI6.11 Copper WrougAi Copper avd Copper Alloy Solderdmm Preuurc Fituvp ............ . ANSI 81612 Csst Copper Allay Soldervloiat Prcssurc Fituvgs .......... .......... . ANS! BI6.18 1.5.6 Joints for the connotion of copper tube shall be brazed, Ezcepnonr Soldeadjoinn (pJ•1 solder meta!) may fx aced for aver-pipe copper rube tysrerrtt. 1.5.7 Other types of finings may be used, but oely thou listed for this service. I6 Sysnm Types. l6.1 Wet-Pipe Sritems. A we4pipe system shall be used when all piping Is installed in areaz not subject to fttxxiog. 16.7 Provision shall b< made to protect piping from freezing in unheated area by use o(one of the following acceptable methods: (a) Antifreeze system. (bl Dryptpe system. lay ACCEriANCE iE5T1 ~aD MAINrES'AtiCF 13R-' Exception. Lisred sin.ndard drv-perdenC drv upright. o. dn' ridewall sprinklers may Ce exceeded into unheaed areas nut intended far living purposes. 16.2.1 Anli(rxze solutions shall b< ivsnlled m accor- dance wi[h 5-;.3 of NFPA 13. smndard for rhr fnuallmron ofSpr;nkler Syarems. Chapter 2 Working Plavs, Design, losnlhtion, Acttptavtt Ten, and Maintenantt 2-1 Workivg Flaos and Acttptaott Tan. 3-1.1 Workivg Plain. Z•l.l.t Working plans shall be submitted for approval to the authority having jurisdiction before any egwpment is installed or remodeled. Deviations from approved plans will requirt permissiao of th<authority having jurisdicuon. 2-1.1.2 Working plans shall be dawn to an indicated scale, on sheen o(uoiform size, with a plan of eaciz Boor, made m that they can be easily duplicated, and shall show the following dart: ' (a) Name of owner and occupavl. (b) Location, including street address. (c) Point of compau. (d) Ceiling coostrumion. (e) Full height crow section. (f) Location of fire walls. (g) Location of panitiom. (h) Occupanry of each area or room. (i) lucatiov soil size of concealed spaces, attics, closets. ana Da1nlDOm c. Q) Avy smal enclosure in which no sprinklers are (o b< inaallzd. (k) Size of ;i',y main in street, pressure and whether desdend or c.rculating and, if dead-end, direction and distantt to nearer ClmUlating male, Clty m81n ttsl renlts including elevation of ter hydrant. (1) Make, manufactunr, type, heabresponu element. tempenturt n[ing, and nominal orifice size of sprinkler. (m1 Tempentun tiring and location of high-temperawre spdnltlen. (o) Number of sptinklen on each duL per Boor. (o} Kind and location of alarm bells. (V) Typc of pipe and fittings. (q) Type of protection for nonmetallic pipe. (rj i:ominai pipe siu wim iengiha snown ro scale. NOTE: Wben typical bunch lino Drcvul, it will be neces- sary to siu ovly ove line. (s) Location and size of riser nipples. (t) Type offittiny and jainn aed location ofall welds and bends. (u) Type and locations of hangers, sleeves, braces and methods of souring sprinkler, where applicable. ,Hlfaro, /3R-g INatALlliION OF SPRINKLER aY1TRJA11N R61nFMIAL OCCUPANdrS UP TO FLUB Srop.IG IN HEIGHT' (v) All eon!rol valves, check valves, drain pipes, and lest 2x1.2.2 When the authority having jursdietiGn dtsirts to connections. be present dlsring the conducting of accepmnce tests, the (w) Underground pipe size, length, location, wcighp ma• installer shall give advance noti8ratson of the time aced date the testing will be performed. serial, point of connection to mty main; the typt Of valves, ` i,' meted, and valv<pits; and the depth at which the lop of Ihe,,.~.r 1 3 Acceptaptt Tests. ` pipe is laid below grade. T 2'1.3.1 Flushing of Underground Connectloas. (x) For hydraulically designed systems, the material to be indudcd on the hydraulic data nameplate. 2-13.1.1 Underground mains and teed-m connections to system risers shall be Bushed before cortna^tion is made to (y} Name and address of wntractoc. sprinkler piping, !n Otdei t0 ICmaYG fOle!ga me[Crlala thel may have entered[he underground piping doting the oourte 2-f.2 App:cmiMSprinkler Sptems. of the installation For all systems, the Bushing operation 2-I.Z.1 The installer shall perform all ttquirod a:.9eptsnre shall be watinued until water u clew. tests (see ?-1.3), complem the Contractor's Material and lest CcniBcate(s) (see Figure 2-1.2.1), and forward the 2-1.3.1.2 Undergromd mains ana iced in connections cenincate(s, to the authority having jurisdiction, prior to shad be Bushed at the hydraulically calculated water do- asking for approval of the installation. mend rate of the syriem. CONTRACTORSMAIERIALATESTCERTIFICATEFOR AnovEGflouuopmwc PRaCEdA9E F ,~,~,ny„~,n~x*e.wwa.rw r ~~x~v~nwrW^wvwyn++w •W..~~.pruwwrr,~yw~• ~~~ wiu uly~,grt~, ~ ~,TMi orq oc nrawt+r~~r~Twm ~mgpFV,~~raw uumxn[f trw,n,r ~o,u .n ti,wc,iv I-~ ~._-rS+wno-~ruumu"~tirR w-~- orcr aw i ,a^coApt, ~.c,w ~ ^ T ~ia~ rra,r.waarna m. ~I®s ~n wan Figure 2.11.1 CPnuaNOr4 MatMil and Te1t CeniBnte tot Aboreppood Pipivg. IYY CbM / /~~ w00.KhG PlN5, CE61G]hSNIIVIO~+lCEPi~~CE iE5T5 i~'n NU~TF4~CE 13R-o 2-I J.1.3 To avoid propetty damage, provision shall be j-2.1.2 Only listed or apprc~ed do ices and materials as made for the disposal of wafer issuing from rest oarless. indicated m [hls standard shall b<uzed in sprinkler satcros. '-1.3.2' All syssems shall be rested far leakage at i0 psi 13 a bars) above maximum system design pressure. E u'epuon ll'hen a/ve deparUrc¢nr eanneebun is prandrd. ht Jrnstaur pressurr rests sNal! be prewded rn acmrdunar ~~~uh ~'FP.1 !i. Standard (or (he lnsmllanon oJ' Sprinkler e~ stem r 2-: Design and Insrahe<ion Z-2.I Devices and )Iaterigls. - :' sp::.:kls s.:a:; v. .:p;o; Cd ~:• .•~. msrallarlon of sprinkler systems. :-2.1.3 Sprinkler systems shall be designetl for a mast mum working pressure of I75 psi 112.1 barsl. Esrepnan.' Higher des!gn pressure) mar be used nhen ul1 (stem components are rated far press«res hgner Nlart f %5 pv !/:.i 5ars/ j-) NLter Supply. j-3.1 Cenenl Provisions. Every automatic sprinkler srs- r<m shall have at leazt one auromztic water snppl)'. ~+'hen stored water is used as the sole sourtt of supply. she :imm-' : y~anT' - ii ty,.a~ she waicr ucmend rem limes 30 minuses. (See 1-5 ~1.d.) ~~ • 'H.'-pAli2lr8 .T6n'rST 3SiTT~~ "EEirr~.Talf4~rP'619....n ~uN w Ir ~I y 4rj wv tivy-w~~ ~w ir'n. ~i'~yi~~vf~ ~~'~~~~.n.n WMe~..r: OiWKr~~ •_ ^ .O n.~l ~ru'n Y Wp MI inOOrra~TY~~9n0~_ ~IIr/4e\~ f.a 1r,rt rR4r P~UM1PY W OM~OYW pe~'y y~ yr WOw M1~~snfm~e~ oavl~mM+uwn~ MIOU~MONmrvWY[~Tr NIbY~a<M ~_ eumlrry.y neu,~6wy a f~ ab • Iwn RiY r~c~ ~pyp ~~ngr3lp^,:.,,,>:~3.'SP.,"r'i~pC2w~~iM ~r.1 "°m"°~"~ ] tf ,y m/~+il~MiNie'~W~~~Y~ ~IU~~a ohs aY4n ulca~ ~ ~i! f V woRnw :m'S'm J _ M..w:a Mn s..w - w.a..u~~.wm.r.=.. nr as. ' • w.nr ass•~o...nwa or ...u.m,~..c~.~..,.sn Fipsre 5.1.2.1 (fwdad) Caavaalor0 Maserul and Tin Cm11Mte far AbMepoaad Piping, X415 t•' . ~~-9 j3lj-Ifl IySGLLATION OF SPRINALfR SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES UP TO FOUR S(ORIFS IN i{EIGHT -_ 2-3.2` Water Supply Sources. The followin6 water supply sources arc acceptable: (a) Aconnection to a:diable water works system with or without e booster pump, as required. (b) An elevated tank. (eJ A pressure tack installed in accordance will, NFPA 13, Standard far the Installatiwr of Sprinkler Systems, and NFPA 22, Standard for Water Tanks for Priva(e Firz Protec- tior„ (d) A stored water source with an automatica'.ly operated pump, installed in accordance with NrrA 20, S<unu'wdfur the Instahation of Centrifugal Fire PumPS. 2-3.3 Dtultipurpose Piping System. 2-3.3.1` A common supply main [o the building, serving both sprinklers and domestic uses, shall be acceptable when the domestic design demand is added to the sprinkler system demand. Exception: Domestic design demand need not be added if provision is made to prevent flow on (he domestic water system upon operation of sprinklers. 2-0.5 Sprinklers. 2-0.5.1 Listed :esideatial sprinklers shall be used inside dwelling units. The basis of such a listing shall consist of tests to establish the ability of the sprinklers to wmrol cesidential fires under standardized fire test conditions. The standardized room fires shall be baud on a residential artay of (umishings and finishes. Exception No. l: Residential sprinklers shall not be used in dry systems unless spealjma((y listed for that purpose. Exception No. 2: Other types of listed sprinklers may be installed in accordancz with their listing in dwelling units mooring the definition of a compartmem (as defined in 2.5.1.2.1) provided no more than four sprinklers me located in the dwelling unit and at least one smoke detector is provided in each sleeping room. 2-0.5.2 Ordinary temperature rated sprinklers (135 to 170'F (57 to 7TC)j shall be installed where maximum ambient Ceiling temperatures do not exceed 100'F (3R'C). 24.5.3 Intermediate temperature rated residential sprin- klers [175 to 225'F (79 to 10TC)] shall be installed where maximum ambieot ailing temperatures arc between 101 2-3.3.2 Sprinkler systems with nonfire protection connec- and I50'F (38 and 66'C). bons shall comply with Section 5-6 of NFPA 13, Smndnrd for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. 24 System Components. 2-0.1 Valve and Drains. 2-4.1.1 t~'.".er. a tor.:moo supply m<In is used :n sspplp both domestic and sprinkler systems, a single listed control valve shall be provided to smut off both the domestic and sprinkler systems, and a separate shutoff valve shall be provmea for the eunres+ic ap,uu U,dr. [~.... ::e~.-~ A-24.1/aj.j E,mep!iun: The spookier system piping may lmve a sepa- ra(e ronrro! mL~a v:hzn supervised by one of the fallowing AIC4{IOils !a; Ccrvral stollen, proprietary, or remote .Srution alarm serene, !b, La:nl alarm sarcire tha( will cause the sounding of an audible signal at a rons;antiy avanrled paint, or (cj Locking the vaL~es open. 2-4.1.2 Each sprinkler system shall have a :-in. (25.4-mm) or larger drain and lest connection with valve on the system side of the control valve. 2-0.7.3 Adddional Irv-in. (i 3-mm) draios shat' be irslallcd ..r .. n.,, . ,., that i cuhiect rn t,„ each :rapvcd -_-.:.... ,,.r. finezing temperatures. ~-i.2 At Icast one I'h in. (3R mmj or 2~h in. (64 mm) fire department connection shall be provided when the sprin- kler system has 20 sprinklers or mote. 24.3 Pressure Gages. Pressure gages shall be provided to indicate pressures on the supply and system sides of main check valves and dry-pipe valves, and to indicate pressure on water supply pressure tanks. 2-4.4 Piping $UPPOIt. Piping hanging and bracing meth- ods shall comply with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installa- (ion of Sprinkler Systems. ,sea Earn / 3~ 2-0.5.4 The following practices shall be observed when installing residential sprinklers, unless maximum expected ambient temperatures are otherwise determined. (a) $prioklers under glass or plastic Skylights exposed to direct rays of the sun shall be of intermediate temperature dassificalion. (b) Sprinklers i^ an unventilated concealed space under zn uninsulated roof, or in an unventilated attic, shall be of 3-0.5.5 When residential sprinklers are installed within a compartment, as defined in 2-5.1.2.2, all sprinklers sball6e from the same manufacturer and have the same 6eat- response element, including temperature rating. Escey(ian: Different temperaure ratings are permitted when required by 2-4.5.4, 2-0.5.6 Standard sprinklers shall be used in areas outside the dwelling unit. Exception No. 1: Residentia! sprinklers may be rued in adjoining corridors or lobbies with JIa4 smooth ceilings and a height not exceeding 10 ft (3.0 mJ. Exreption No. 1' Quick-response sprinklers may be used in accordance wi(h 1-5.2, Exception No. 1. 245. i Operxtcd w dawagcd spr nklc , s.`.d; be :cp:a~.d with sprinklers having the same performance chazameristics as original equipment. 24.5.8 When nonmetallic ceiling plates (euutcheons) aze used, they shall be listed. Escutcheon plates used to create a recessed or flush-type sprinkler shall be part of a listed Sprinkler assembly. 2-4.5.9 Painting and Ornamental Finishes. 24.5.9.1 Sprinkler Games may be factory painted or enameled as ornamental finish in accordance with 2-4.5.9.2; otherwise, sprinklers shall not be painted and any sprinklers xnaxiw =s.~s. DSslm Lsn u.no. +r rerr,.rs rrsrs ,~n .n nr[..vs IaR-I I that have been painted. except those wnh iaaorv apphetl coatings. shall be replaced with new hsmd sprinklers. Y4.5.9.3- Omamenral finishes shall nos be applied to sprinklers b~ amore other than the sprinkler manufacturer. end onl. spnnkiers hsmd xnh such finishes shall be used, -4.6 4larms. Local wa¢rllow alarms shall 6e prodded on all sprinkler 5}seems and shall be connected [o the buddme me alarm system ss hen prosided. 3.5 System Design. ?-5.1 Design Criteria-Inside Dwelling L'nil. 2-S.LI Ce,lgn Discharge. The seem snail pre.ide a durharge of not less than 18 gpm (68 L~mml to any sing!e operating sprinkler and no[ less than 17 gpm IJ9 L/mir.l per sprinkler to the number of design sprinklers. but not less than the hating of the sprinklerys7. E.roepno,i Den¢n d+rcharge jot sprinklers mFal/ed m at- :n~danre ~., uh Exrepuvn \'a l 0l''-45 / sl;all be w ua'ur- dan:'r n rrh :prmd'ler bsunq rrtrerm. ?-5.11' ]'umber a( Design Sprinklers. 2.5.1.3.1 The number of design iprinkkrs shall include all sprinklers wuh+n a compartment Io a maximum of four spr nkierv 3-5.1.3.3 The definition of compartment (or use in '~5.1. `.I to determine the number o(design sprinklers rs a space shat +s complel<ly enclosed by walls and a ceiling. The compartment endosur<may has<up<nings to an adjoining soace tithe openings has<a minimum lintel depth o(8 in. ;303 uunl from Inc cethrg. 3-5.1.3 N'ster Demand. The water Cemand for the svstem shall be derermmed by multiplying the design discharge of _ - , a ui uoign spnnkiers of _o.l. ~. 2-5. LJ Sprinkler Cmenge. 2-5.1 A.1 Resider nal sprinklers shall be spaced se thin the maximum area pro¢cmd by a sin8&e spn nkler does not tined :4a sq ft I i 7.J ml. 2-S.I A.3 The maatmum durance between spnnkiers shall ~2b l.oegtlog of Sprinkler. no! erc<ed C ft i3.' ml and the maximum distance to a all areas. wall nr na r, u,nn shall ~m .. ~..n k n , i ¢ ...~ 2-g, I,4J The m+mmum distance between sprinklers with- in a cem partment shall be A ft 13,4 ml. 2a.L5 The m+mmum operating pressure o(any sprinkler shall be in accordance with the listing mformauon of the sprinkler and shall provide the minimum 17aw rams speci- fied m '-i. I I. 2-5.1,6 4pphcatrnn rates. design areas, areas of coveage. and mmtmum design pressures olh<r than those specified m _'-il.l. _-i.l '. 'S.LJ. and ?-5.1.5 may be used wnh Spenal sprinklers shat have been hued for such speufic revdenoal installation <ondnions. 2-5,1.7 Position a( Residential Sprinkler. 2.5.1.7.1 Pendent and upnghl sprinklers shall be posi- tioned so lhar the dellectors are wuh+n I to J m,!-'S,4lo 103 mm1 hom the cnlmg. E ctrpuon Spenal rcndenua/ sprinklers si+a/i Pr unrdik,i m /<rordanrr .. uh rbr Gsuny iunucnuns 2-S.LZ'_ S+tlewai! sprinklers shall b< povtioned so tha: the dellecrors are . ohm J to fi in. 1102 to U? mini from the ceihng. Es.eprmr+, Spracl res+drmml spr+nklers shall be msrallyd ni aornrdancr „uh d+r iunn¢ wnuanons 2.5.1.7,7• Sprinklers shall be posuionetl so that the re- spense rime and discharge are not unduh' aHett<d by obstructions wch as ceiling slope, beams. or light fixtures. 3-i.3 Design Criteria-6utside Dwelling Cnil. The de- vgn discharge, number of design spnnkiers. waver demand of the system, sprinkler coverage. and posinen of spn nklers for areas Io be sprinklered e~tside the dwelling unit shall comply with specifications in VFP.4 13. Standard !i>r. A+e lnstallarian U,(Sprinkler Systems. Exception A'o. l: N'hen compartmented nits areas of SUO sq jr r46 m'% or less by J0.mmuzeJire-toted consburnon, and the area is protected bvsmndard ar gwck-response sprinklers nor e.rreedmg !JO sq ft It? mr/ per sprinkler, the srsrem demand may be (imrted ro the number oJ'tprinkl¢rs ~in (he compartmem area, bur nor less than a coral af(aur tprrnklers. Openings from the romparrmenrs nerd nos be prorerred provided such openings are prarrded with a lintel at least 3 m. /103 mini m depth and the total area of such openings doer not e.rceed 50 sq,l! 14,6 m') for each romparrmenr. Drscharye dens+ry shall 5e appropriate for the harard classifimrtan as derermmed be 5'fP.4 !3. Earrpaan Jn, ?. Lvbb+rs, m other than hotels urd rnuteis. Jgvers. oomdors. and halls oumde the do riling unrt. wish lint, smaath oedingt and not rsreeding lU !r tJ D mr m he+ghr. mac be prutened wrfh residenua! spnnAdera nuh a ,,,~..,,,,,,,, vr. ur,r,unu p(ivur spnn.r+rrs. 2.5.3 Pipe Sizing. Piping shall be sized in accordance wish by drauhc cakulatwn procedures to comply with ~ FP.4 13. Standard for the instal/anon ql Sprinkler Ss'srems. Sprinklers shall b< installed m E.rcepnon h'o. 1: Sprinklers may be omnred Irnm halh- rooms not ecreedmg 55 sq fr !A/ mr/ wrrh nunrombusnble ph+mbmg braves Exrepuan Na. 1: .Sprinklers mm' hr omrtred (trim unull rlarhes closers where the leusr d+menmun dues rim e.rreed J Ir IO 9 m/ and the aree duet tint exceed _'I sq fr !?.: mr/ and the rolls and enlwg are mrlnred wish nnnmm5usnhir ar lrant- ed romMrsnhle marenafs asdefined be .VfP.l ':0. smndard ..n Tr~ar .,i ku, u,oo r.,~o....,,,,. ' Escepnon .NO. C Sprinkler.! trim' be ummed Irom antra penthouse rqu+pmenr roorhs, amyl spares. /loori<rthn,q spuo• es elevator sha(rs. and other ronreaied spares thin ore mrt used or mtanded fm li sting purporet or snnugr LT Maintensnee. The owner is responsible for the cote dition of a sprinkler system and shall keep the ssum m normal operating condmon. / ~ / wn eanm 13R-II L~STALUTION OF SPRINRLE0.5VSFENS IN aFS10EN(IAL OCCUPAtiCIFS UP TO FOUR SIDaIF51N I1EIGIIT Chapter 3 Referenced PuDlica[ions 3.1 Thcfollowmg documents or portions thcrcofarerefer- eaced within this standard ant shall be considered part o[ the requirements of this document The edition indicated .`or each reference is the current edition as of the date of the NFPA issuance of this document. 3-1.1 NFPA Publications, National Fire Protection Asso- ciatio¢, Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. h FPA 13-i989, Standard far <hrimiuiiuiian j'Sp, i;:kfe; Systems NFPA 20-1987, Standard for the lnrtallatian ofCenbifu~ gal Fire Pumps NFPA 22-1987, Standard for Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection NFPA 74.1989, Srmldard for the lnsmllation, ,4Jainfa- nance, and Gse ofHaluehald Fire Warning Equipmem NFPA l0!a-1988, Life Safety Codes NFPA 220- 1985, Smndard on Types of Building Canstrue- (IOn. 3-1.2 Other Publications. 3-1.2.1 ANSI Publications. American National Standards Institute, Inc„ 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. ANSI Dib.l-1975, Cast !ton Pipe Flanges ana' Flanged Finings. Class 25, 125, 150 and 8i)G ANSI 876.3-: v8 i, Malleable iron Threaded FiHiags, Class 150 and 3GG ANSI B 16.4-1985, Cast Iron Threaded Fittings, Classes ANSI B 16.5-1981, Pipe Flanges and Flanged FiH:ngs ANSI BIG.9-1986. Facmry-,M11ade Wrmrght Steel Butt- welding Fi,:ings ANSI B 16.1 I-1980, Forged Sme(Fittingr, Snekeb Welding and Threaded ANSI 616.18.1984, Cast Capper Alloy Solder Joint Pres~ sure Finings ANSI 816.22-1980, Wrough: Cnpper and Copper Allay Snider Joint Pressure Fittings ANSI B16.25.198G, Buuwelding Ends ANSI B36.IOM-1985, Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe, 3-1.2.2 ASTM Publications. American Society for Testing ouu iviuiuidl5, 1 , .ace u.r~~,, ...~ ::pF.ia, 0 1¢1n3, ASTM A53-1987, Standard Speclftealion for Pipe, Steel, Black and NohDlpped, Zinc-Caamd Welded and Seamless Steel Pipe ASTM A135-1986, Smndard Specifcation for Eleelric- Resistance-Welded Slee! Pipe ASTM A234-1987, Smndard Specification for Ptping Fit- tings of Wrought-Carbon Sreef and Alloy Steel Jbr Moderate and Elevated Temperanves ASTM A795-1985, Spenficalion for Black and tfot- Dipped ZincCmted (CalvaniredJ Welded and Seamless Steel Pipe for Fire Protection Use AST1d B32-1987, Standard Specification for Snider Meml, 95.5 (Fin-Antimony-Grade 95TA) ASTM B$8-1986, Smndard Specifcation for Seamless Copper Waver Tube ASTM H251-1987, Slandmd Speclfrcatian for General Requirements far Wrough! Seamless Copper anA Copper- A!loy Tube ASTM E380-i 98h, Standard far Metric Prae(ice. 3-1.2.3 AWS Publirstion. Amerca¢ Welding Society, 2501 N \V. 7th Street, Miami, FL 33125. AWS A5.8-f 931, Speeifualion for Brazing Filler Mefal. Appeadiz A Thinnpprndix is not a part afrAe requiremmu ofr.5u NFPA davmeng dut u indudN/qr informa:ien puryp,u only. A-1-] NFPA 13R is appropriate for use only in residential occupancies, as an oytion to NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, as defined in this stm- dard, up to four stories in height. Residential portions of any other building may b< protected with residential sprin- klers in accordance with bl L2.9 of NFPA 13, Stundardfnr the!rstalla!icr. crSprinkler Sstems. Other portions of such sections should be proteMed in accordance with NFPA 13. The critmia in this standard are based on full-scale fire tests of rooms contaiai¢g typical furnishings found in resreemrv ,iviug rwms. niwucua, ouu i,wrvv,ua.: n :~.- nishings were arranged az typically found in dwelling uni-s in a mama similar to that shown in Figures A-I-I(a), (b), and (c). Sixty ful4scale fire tests were conducted in a. two-story dwelling in Ws Angeles, California, and 16 tests were conducted in a 14Ct (4.3-m) wide mobile home in C'harlolte, North Carolina. Sprinkler systems designed and installed according to this standard arc expected to prevent gashover within the compartment of origin if sprinklers are installed in the compartment. A sprinkler system designed and installed according to this staadazd may Hat, howeveq be expected to control a fire involving musually higher average fuel loads Ihaa typical for dwelling mils [ I O psi (0.7 bar)], configurations of furls other thm those with typical residential occupamies, or conditions where We interior finish has an unusually high game spread ratirrg (greater than 225). To he effective, smiuklm araiCWS i¢iraiied is accardancs with this standard must have the sprinkles closest to the fire open hefore the fire exceeds the ability of Ne sprinkler discharge to extinguish or control that fire. Conditions that allow the fire to grow beyond that point before sprinkler activation or that interfere with the quality of water distri- bution can product conditions beyond the wpabilitia of the sprinkler system Aescribed in this standard. Uausualty high ceilings or ceiling configurations that tmd to divert the rising hot gases from spri¢kler locations or change the sprinkler discharge pattern from its stmdard pattern can product fire wnditions that cannot be extinguished or controlled by the systems described i¢ this standard. ,tea Eanwn l 3 ~- c ~rv:ngroom /~ 3 Molr~:e Horne Betlroom } N tYlN Eao: * Ign:non C Cnav (~ 5pri::x~er B BeE cv c~na:m He Heu BwrO C Orermr N WqM SdOO CH Cnen L umo For SI unm: I m. - 25! mm. Fi{vu Ad-IIU Bedawm. A Igmnon O Sprinkler CW Cu rta:m D Drmur C Chan 8 Bt0 For 51 Voilx I m. • 25.t mm. FIFme A-1-1(0) MolIN Hone BNrpom. E -End Ude CV: - Cerium ~-Lamd Q-Bprvnxur For 51 Uniu: 1 m. • 2f t mm, Fipm A•I.11<I Daly 0.wn. 138-14 6YST4L'uT10H OF SPRINKLER 51'STEMS Iy RE51DENTIAL000UPA,\'CIFS OP TO FOVR STORIES r4 HEIDH'r" Table Aaa Annual Ararages of Deaths and Injuries in Apartments 1980.1984 Fires-123,000 Cirilinn Deerhs-930 Cirilivv Injuries-5,470 Percentages by Area v(Origin Area of Origin (901 Code) Civilian Deaths (Used far Aanking) Fires Civilian Injuries Living room, den, lounge (14) 38 $ - Hedroam (21x27 . 28 ] 113 23.2 Kitchen (24) 9 8 17.4 2?,I Hallway corridor (101) , q 3 35.3 27.2 Intcdor stairway (03) . 3 2 3'2 3.4 ~.__-...--..__ .,,, .... L0 I 1 V,~Bakony~porch (]2)J J.I (1.2) B'I 3.5 II1nsPemfietl (79)1 (LOj (1.3 ) (0.7) I7 eilin g~AOOf assembly (74)] (0 3) ( ( ) O ~ , U.]) 0.3 Dini groom (23) I.Y 0'6 0 8 0,7 Closet (42) 12 . L0 Balcony, Porch (72) 1 2 1.9 1.9 Other known single ara . q 1 1.3 0.7 (Bathroom ("'SJ] 06 ( 7 17'8 (2 1) 8.8 1 3 Multiple areas (9?) 1,6 . 0 0 ( . ) Undasslficd, no: . 0.9 applicable (9899) Lg 0 6 Tctai: IU0.0 . 100.0 0.5 100.0 A-I-2 Levels of Protection. Various levels of sprinkler protection are available to provide Iite safety and property protecion. The standard is designed to provide a high, but not absolute, level oflife safety' and a lesser level o(nroperty pmtcctmr,. Greater protection to both life and property could be achieved by sprinklering all areas in accordance with NFPA 13, S(anda.~d for rhr Installation of Sprinkler Systems, which hermits the use of residential snrinklrre io residential areas. ' This standard recommends, but does not require, sprin- klering of all areas in the building; it permits sprinklers to be omitted in certain areas. These areas are the ones shown by NFPA statistics to be ones where the incidence of life loss L-om fires in residential occupancies is law. Such an ap- proa:h pw~ldcs a reasonable degree of fire safety to Gfe. (Ste Table A-1-1 fOr Deaths and Injurer in Muinfamily Residenrin/Buildings) It should be recognized that the omission of sprinklers fmm certain areas could result in the development oC untenable conditions in adjacent spaces. Where evacuation times may be delayed, additional sprink:er protection and other fire protection features, such as detection and com- partmentation, may be necessary. a-T_r a i ~- - ~::0g Jf a iyikm can be. acCOmp115F.td by filling the system with water and chceking usually for leakage at each joint or coupling, Fire dryarlment connections are not required for all systems covered by this standard, but may be installed at the discretion of the owner. In these cases, hydrostatic tests in accordance with NFPA 1 J, Smndard for [he /nsml(ation of Sprinkler Srsrems, arc required. Dry systems should also be tested by placing the system under alt pressure. Any leak that results :n a drop in system pmssurc greater than 2 psi (0.14 barJ in 24 hours should be corrected. Check for leaks using soapy water brushed nn each joint Dr coupling. Leaks will be shown by the presence of bubbles. This lest should be made prior to concealing of p!ping. A-2-2.1.1 At least three spare sprinklers of each type, temperature rating and orifice size used in the system should be kent on the nremss.~ Wh.,, r.,..n ...,.:.,w.-. .._- rcplaced by the own<q fire department, or ~olhers, care should be taken to assure that the replacement sprinkler has the same operating eharaMeristics. a-2-3.2 Connection (or fire protection to city mains is often subject to (oral regulation concerning metering and 6ackfiow orevention requirements. Pr<Cerred and aceepta- hle water supply arrangements are shown in Figures ,A-2-3.2(x), (b), and (c). When a meter must be used between the city water main and the sprinkler system supply, an acceptable arrangement is shown in Figure A-2-3.2(c). Under these circumstances, the flow characteristics of the meter must be included in the hydraulic calculation of the system. When a tank is used for both domestic and fire protection purposes, a low water alarm acuated when the water level (ails below 110 percent of [he minimum quanti- ty specified in 2-3.1 should be provided, A-2-3.3a 1 ne tables on the following page can be uud to determine a domestic design demand. Using Table A-2-3.3.1 (a), determine the total number of water supply fixture units downstream of any point in the piping serving both sprinkler and domestic needs, Using Table A-2-3.3.1(6), determine the appropriate total Oow allow- ance, and add this Oow to the sprinkler demand at the to- tal pressure required for the sprinkler system at that' point. A-2-4.5.9.2 Decorative painting of a residential sprinkler is not to be confused with the temperature identification less Ear /~ YJamr Muir ~_POV Gam valve rg Domnsoc ?~svsrem v ai~eCpeno~~~ 1. F Yla;e• Domeetic 'a"ooe• c.rcele _~.r roam: snu;-on Cna.a ep. _`I~ P'essure Gage Vai.e waver eiow Yam ana reTS; ~Oelac;or % ^~ ~ Tp na;Oma[i[ $pnnb er Svsrzm Eigure A-~-J.1N) Prrfmble Amegemenr. Mum G;y Garc Vuve $pnn Fitt cam.gi varo! was 'Ranbv Fac•n Oahon Ralerlnce Cnlc¢ varoe ]q I I E+ceptwn M<mr Np. I I Presfwe Gage Dommac • snug-all -l Fle.. -~-re~ViiV! D'a~n and Teat Omertpr Connernan Prmmn Gage --- I Tn mnnmu,r r n So'~nkler ~ ~ gyllem + svs;lm Fiaure A-bJ.31b) .{cttDUble Amagemmt with KM1e Suprrvblon ISee La I I E.rcepnan.l Waver Abin Cny Gave Value Waver Flow Water De u<rar $almkl•r Memr P•euvre Gage Comma Verve Mun Connor \ IOPLan Regrence valve 'u nummanc \ J~ti E+croaon v,,..,,i~., w......, i~ N.. u i ~ r l Ta OOmnr¢ 6num -~ I Oamuuc Dremure Gape snu tall Dram and Tea Vawe Connor non 'Rue0er Fxad Cneck Varv• Rulmn facto Cneck VaWef DPnanel Figun AQ•J.3(c) Atttgabk Amnpmrnl with Ydre Superrisia. (Srr l-I.l 1 B,rrepnan.) ~3S 13R-IS -ble .{-2JJ.ga) Fixrvre Load tilues Prim kcilities Iwithin individual dwellini units) L'nit Bathroom group wrtA Outh tank Oncluding lavatory, water closet. and bathtub wrth snowed n Bathroom group wnh 0ush valve g Bathtub Dishwuhm ~ Kimhen sink - Laundry~rays J Lavatory I shower Hall Wazmng machine Water clout wul' hush ealve 6 W'mer cioxs wnn duen tan[ J Public Fatilltla aathtub J Drinking fountain 0 Kitchen sink a lavatorv $ervice sink J snower head J Urinal with I in. Oush valve 10 Urinal with .in. 0ush valve Unoal wi[n ausn tank 7 Washing machine (g Ib) 3 Wishing machine 11616) J Water clout wi[h 0ush valve 10 water clout with 0ush tank T~bk AQ-l.J.l(b) ToW Esnmaua Domntic Ikmmd total Flame Total Demand In Gdbm Per Alinne fad Uain Far SDSUms with For $NI•ms witA (ham T~bk Paadam3aud/ Pndnminantly A-3-7.J,Ip51 flnA Tanlu Flash Vdm 1 aY"' 3 5 10 I i gpm 10 IS '_5 ]0 30 s5 35 ZS JS 50 70 SO 70 J5 60 100 65 '0 150 55 g0 100 65 '+0 130 IS 100 J50 100 I_`5 500 135 150 750 !75 ,75 1000 100 _00 1300 '7S 375 1000 J25 Ji5 3300 500 i00 colors as referenced m 34 Lb of NFPA I3, Smndard /nr Jm /nsrdllanon o/Sprmk(er Systems. A•2-S.LS it is intended that the design area is to mcludr up to four adjacent spnnklers producing the greaten water demand within the compartment. A-2-3.1.7.7 Fir<testing has indicated thr n«d to wervall. in the area protected by residential spnnklers w J Icscl l tag f a 13R-16 INSgLIdiION OF sYNMKLER SYSTEMS IN 0.FSInEMIAL OCCUPGNCIES UP TO PoL'n SiDRIFS IN HEIGFR Ceil ln9 t M, o.~ Figme A-b5.1.2(v) Sprinkler Design Areas for'lypiul Residential Occupsncy. pYpn omw Ma lan„pvan,ryxe zauxa Flgurc s-hS.r.t(b) Sprinker Design Arras tvr TypiN Residential Occupavry. anal ;eJ:r~9 Not m Exceed Maximum ~v:uctwn Permlrted Isee &5.1.7.1 ar I 2-5.1.].21 ~- Maximum Durance Deflector Above aottvm of Ceiling Obstruction ' of Ceiling Ohstuction ' Figme A-2-5.1.73 PnaiGOV of DeBMOr, Uprighe or Peedenq Whee Leafed Aborc Bottom of CelGvg ObsnsxYiov. A-2-7 The responsibility'forproperlymaintainingaspin- kler system is the obligation of the owner or manager, who should uadcntand the sprinklcr systcm operation. A mini- mum montlJy maintenance program should include the following: (a) Visual inspection of all sprinklers to ensure against obstruction of spiny. (b) Inspection of all valves to auure that they are open. (c) Testing of all wateAOw devices. (d) Testing of the alarm systcm, if installed. NOTE: When is appears likely [haI the test will resull iv a :apnmv cf :hc hro dcpartmeat, vaiihCa:ioa r thz firz Oepartmeet should be made prior to the tat. (e) Operation of pumps, where employed, should be r.A TICpn 'rn ..J-.J f. •L. r Centrifugal Fire PJmps. ~ -~-~~-- - ~ ~~•- -~~~~~~c..,.~~ _~ (f) Checkiog of the pressure of air used with dry systems. (g) Checking of water level in tanks. closer to the ceiling than that accomplished by smndard sprinkler distribution. Where beams, light fixtures, sloped ceilings, and other obstructions occur, additional residen- tial sprinklers may be necessary to achieve proper response and distribution, and a greater water supply may be neces- sary. 7abie A-2-1.1.7.3 and Figure A-2->. i. i.3 provide guid- ance Cor location of sprinklers near ceiling obstructions. Table A-2-5.1.7.3 Maximum Disance tram Sprinkler D<Oeaor to Bottom of Ceiling Obstmctioo Maximum Dislmtt from Sprinkler Degeclor Distance from Sprinkler to Bottom of to Side of Ceiling Obstruction Cziling Obstruaioa Isss than 6 in Not pcrmittcd bin. to less Shan I fl Oin. 1 0 to Ices than 2 !t I in. 2Rto less than](tbin. tin. 2 f1 fi in. to Icss than 3 ft J in. 7Rto less than3 R6is 4in. J A 6 in. to less thin 4 R 6 in. 4 fs to Itu than 4 R 6 in. 7 in. 4It b in. to less shoo 5 ft 9 in. S R to Ims than S R 6 in. 11 in. 5 R 6 in. to Tess than 6 ft I4 in. Far SI llniss: I in. - 25.1 mm; 1 n ~ 03018 m 'hble A-2-7 Inspection, Tntlvg, and Mslvtevae¢ Requircmevb Compoomt pctlrlry Fregmvry Reference Control Valve Impaction MontLly Maintevava Annually NFPA IJA, za.l.a Main U:aiv Valve Flow Test Annually NFPA 13A, 2-b, l InapCClOri Test Valve Fiow Teat Annually WatfrllnW Alarm Fln_W'I?rl Ann~.vtlr ----- ~ NFVA Ild 45.3, 47.1 Sprinklers Test 50 Yn. NFPA 13A, 3-3.3 Sprinklcn; Rcs/QR Test 20 Yn. NFPA I3A, 3.3.4 Pump Flow Test Arvually NFPA 13A, 2.1.2.5 Antifreere Solutions Tnt AnvuaBy NPPA 13A, 47.3 rues sallm /~ (h) Can should be taken to see that sprinklers are not painted either at the time of instWla[ion or during subse- quent redecoration. When painting sprinkler piping ar painting in area next to sprinklers. the sprinklers may be protected by covering with a bag, which should be removed immediately after painting is finished. For Porther information stt NFPA 13A, Recommended Procure for the lmpeaion, 7ening and .Nainrenance of Spnrtkler Svrtems. Appendix B Rekrenaed Pablintlooa &1 The following dowmenss or portions thereof arc rc(erenced within this suodud Cor informational purpous only and thus are not considered pan of the requirements of /37 I7R-17 this documw[. Th< edition indicated for each mfennce is the current edition as of the date of the NFPA issuance of lhls document. &i.l NFPA PnbRUNana. National Fire Protection Asso- ciation, Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. NFPA 13-1989, Standard for the lmrdlarion ofSprinkier Syrtems NFPA I JA-1987, Recommended Praai<e far the /aspen rion, Tesring artd ,Nainsenance ofSprinkio Svrtrms NFPA 20.1967, Standard for the /rulallarion of Centrifu- gal fire Pumps. iwa eana~ i3R-18 Ip'STALLATION OF SPRINKLE0. SYSTEMS IN 0.FSIDENTUL CCCIIPANCIFS IlP TO FOUR SIDRIE4IN HEIGHT Index G 1989 National fit[ Prolcclion Assximian, all riQbls rcRrv[d. Th<copydgLa m aM1is mtl¢ is sepanlc snd duuna from Nc cvpy[igln in ahc JOCUmcn[ mM1¢p it intlan. the liccmio® prOrisiom x[ (oM (oc Ne Jocamn[ tic of aPPlloblc to T.is inda. This Indv mry nos M xprodenJ in wMlc or N Pan by any mnm wiahvuc PLC ¢prw wr1[mn pcrmlWw of the NaJVOaI Firc Prot[CUOn Amciaunn, Inc. -A- Accepuvcc s¢u .. .. . .... ............ . . . ... .. ..2-13, A-2.1.3.2 Nmnmg Pnacagrvuva wnverovns . ... .... . .. . .. ... .. .. ...1-1.).1 Aww ........... .... .. . .... . ..... . .. .. ... .... .. ... .2J.6 wasesllow Defivition ............._... .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. ..... .. ...i-3 AvNfrecac aP1ullow ........... .. .. .. .. .. . ........ ... . .Ifi3.1 Appeonl of mtcma ....... ... .. .. . ... . .. .. .. .2-1.2, Fib z-t 1.I Pmlmaoe vL ............ ... .... ..... .... ........... .I J.2 SivvevL ............... ....... ..... ..... .. .........2-S.J support ................. ................... .........2J.4 PIpW Mltma. mWSleueome. ... 2.1 t s iati T+bim A-1-3.3.1 (a ana b) Dcfiviuvv ................ ... .. . .. . ........ ..... .......I-3 Psebvrc Otg¢ ............ .... ............. ..... ......2J.3 Protecaen, I<wle of .. ... ... .A-1-2, Figs. A-1- (a Wrv c~ Table A-1-2 Pwmae of auvdud ........ ........................1-2, A-1-1 C Cmmpvv<nu, system ........ ... .. .. .. ... .. ... ... .... ... ..zJ ComeNOw, fire depanmeat ...................Ad-1.3.2, .A-ZJ.2 -D- Iblgn ana lw¢IwlPO ............... ................x-x, A-z-z Dwius and matWils .. .. . ... ... .. ... .. .. .. .. ....b1.1, A3.2.1 SYStcm .................... .. . .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ....23, A-2.5 Cri¢ria, imidc dw<IIin6 unit ......... ....... ...........2.5.1 cdmdx, enDiae awemeq emt...~ ... ......... ..........za2 Fim tmivg ............... .. . .... ... . .. . .... . ... ..A-0-IJJ Srstem mmvonvnts ~, .. .. ... +-4 Wales suppiY ................ .. .. .. ... .. . .... .... 1.3, A.b3 aNalµ d4cLarg ... .... ..... .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. ..sn Dvebatge Dcsccser. watarBOw Definition ................ ... ... .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. ... ..iq axhM. n..ie.. Definition ..... .. .. . .. .... .. .. .. .. ..... .. ... ... ...I-l Dnlw .. . .. .. ... .. . .. . .. .. ... .... .. .. .. ... ... .. .. . .2J.1 Dryayatema ............... .... ..... . .. .. . .. .1.6.1(b)~A-}1.1.2 Definition. .. ., .. . ... .. ... ... .. .. .IJ OwelUVg uob DaS m:ion .. .. .. .... .... .. . .. .. .. ... .1.3 f Fllalvpa .. .. ... .. .. .. .. ... .. ............1.5.1.1.5.] MamAals ana aimenzions .. ... .... .... _ .... _Table 65.1 .(. ImulhJav . .. .. .. ... . .. ... ..see Dnign and instillation J. Jolnu . .. .... ... ............ ... .............65.6 M- Musurcmens . . .. .. ... .. ... .... ... sec Units of meazuremens p. PlPlvg.. .., ...~ ... .. .. .. ... .... .. ... .. ... ..LS Mtlerlala and dimemivm .. .. ... ... .. . ~ .. .. ... .T~bl< L5, i R ItmlarotW ox pantl¢ Defini:icv ..................... .... ... .. .. . ... .. .... .. .1-J -5- $CPFn of suvavd ...... .. . .. ... ... ... ..... .. ..... L1, A-I-I SPrlvklerc ................. ... .... .. .. .......... .. ....2J.5 Avbmalic Defioiaov .................. .... .. ....... ... .. ..... ..1.3 Coverage .................... ... .. .. ...... .... .. ....YS.IA Im¢4oe of ................ ... .. . . . ... ..... .. .. ... ... . .2.6 Numbv of .............. .. .. ... . ... ...... ..2.5.1.2. A.2-5.1.1 Paivtin¢ and nmamrntal finisho .. .... .... .... ~~4.5.9. A-1-4...9.2 Position of .................. .. ... . .. ...~...L5.1 J. A3-5.1.] R¢idevtiJ.......~ ........... .. .. .. .. ..1J.S.I,2J.5.4, 3J,5.5 Definition .................. .. .. .. .. ........ .. .. .....IJ .In 41w ..n r... ~AFPravil of .. .. .......... .... .. . . . .. . ..... .. ........2-I.I Defivilivv ................. .. .. ... .... ..... .. .. ..... .. .1-) Suvdud D<finition.......,~ ........ ... .. . . . . .. .... .... .... ... . .IJ T Rsu .... ... .... .... ... . .. . .. .... .. .. ... s¢ AaePUnm t¢ts -U- Uolu of meaaurcmrot ......... ... .. .. ... ..... ...... .. ... .IJ .y. Valm.....,.,~ ....... .... .. ... .. . ... .. ... .. ... .... eJl lw~nt Definition ............... ... .. ... .... ... .. .. . .. .. ... .1.3 Control De6waov ................ ...... ..... ... ..... ...... ..1.) -W- w.eel aemana .................. .....................2.5.1.3 Water rvPPIY ............. ... .. . . . .... ................. R-3 Soumu .................... .. . . .... .. . .. .. . ...1.3.2. A.y3.2 WaterHaw alarm ................. ..... ...........see Alawa Wet systems ................. ... .. . ... .. ..... ...... ....I fi.l DefiniCVO ............ .. .. .... . .. . .... ... .1-3 . .. . .. ... . 1briJm{Flaw .................. .. ... .. . .... ... .. .. .. 1-1.1 ,~aemMn ~3 8 STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 - HIX ppea o e ann ng aam ss an s ec s on raga re t e undergroundtng of utilities and the construction of street and storm drainage improvements beyond the pro,~ect boundaries for a residenttal subdivision of 65 single family lots on 19.7 acres of land located south of 19th Street between Nell man Avenue and Amethyst Street in the Low Residential District - APN 202-061-12, 14, 40 and 44 E. RECOMIENOATIDN: Staff recomaends that the City Council sustain the Planning Coawlssion's action by a denial of the appeal request by approving the attached Resolution of Denial. II. BACK6RDllMD n., .u~.., o~ roan ttie ni ..,.,i.,,. r,,,.,i,.~,... un,ni,,,.n eto ,n,..,,,,od 7.s,~i on Tract 14192. As part of the approval of the Tentative Tract Mep, conditions consistent with City Standards and policies were imposed. Four of these conditions are being appealed by the applicant. These conditions Dertain to: 1. Construction of street improvements on the east side of Hellman Avenue, north and south of the pro,~ect site; 2. Undergrounding of existing overhead utilities on Hellman Avenue, north and south of the project site; 3. Reconstruction of Mignonette Street, as determined by a structural report; and a, Ca^str:.^!f^ of Portia,. of the Amethyst S!arm Drai^ south cf the project-site. H15 letter's of appeal are attached for your reference. ( a~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENT TRACT 14192 - HIx OEYELOPMENi SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 2 III. ANALYSIS: A. Engineering Condition No. 3 - Hellman Avenue widening: "Construct street improvements on the east side of Hellman Avenue from 19th Street south to meet the existing widened portion north of Monte Yista Street. Offsite parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property, with the exception for the tyro not-a-part lots fronting on Hellman Avenue which are surrounded by the project. The Developer mqy request reimbursement agreements to recover Lhe costs of constructing offsite street improvements from future development as it occurs." Hellman Avenue adjacent to the project site currently has a pavement width of 24 feet. This 1s a full 20 feet less than the 44 foot standard roadbed for a coilector and 12 feet less than the required width for even a local residential street. The required street improvements along the project frontage include a 10 foot widening to 22 feet (measm~ed from the centerline) on the east side of Hellman Avenue, which will increase the total pavement width to 34 feet. The developer is protesting the requirement to extend that same widening 250 feet south of and 300 feet north of the tract boundaries, with the potential for reimbursement from future development (refer to Exhibit "C".) The 1987 Traffic Count for Hellman Avenue in this vicinity was 4,200 average daily trips (ADT), well above the 1,500 ADT maximum preferred for local residential streets which are 36 feet wide. The addition of 65 houses will result 1n 860 additional trips, half of which, it can be assumed, wilt use Nell man Avenue. This 10 percent increase in traffic can better be accomxodated on a 34 foot street section. The developer suggests that he be allowed to transition back to the existing 24 foot width north and south of his tract boundaries. This would have the effect of leaving two short bottlenecks on a relatively busy street resulting 1n confusion and inconvenience to the general public. B. Engineering Condition No. 1 - Ut11Tt1es Undergrounding: "The existing overhead utilities (teletommunlcatlons and electrical) on the project side of Nell man Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side of 19th Street to the first pole on the south side of Monte Vista Street prior to public lye CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENT TRACT 14192 - HIX DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 3 improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The Deveioper may request reimbursement agreements to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development and/or redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street and offsite on the same side of the street. At so, all existing overhead utilities service lines to houses on both sides of Hellman Avenue shall be placed underground at the same time as the main line." The required undergrounding along Hellman Avenue is shown on Exhibit "D". The site is 990 feet in length. Current policy requires that undergrounding extend to the first pole offsite; therefore, for this p ro,lec t, the standard length of undergrounding 1s 1181 feet. As noted on uie exhibit, additionai undergrounding was required 460 feet south of and 320 north of the protect boundaries. This additional undergrounding was required, because it was felt that the expense of moving the poles for the street widening would be better spent in undergrounding, where the Developer has an opportunity to be reimbursed from future development. Secondly, it is felt that there will be a reduced unit Cost for the additional work due to econo~ of scale. Lastly, the limits were extended across Monte Vista and 19th Streets to clean up an entire block at one time. C, Engineering Condition No. 11 - Mignonette Rconstruction: "Reconstruct Mignonette Street as detenmined by structtrrat .ep..a ;~C.,„SiLed co and approved by the City Engineer prior to approvai of the Final Map or issuance of bull ding permits, whichever occurs first." The development will contribute both additional traffic and drainage to Mignonette Street. This condition requires the developer to perfona a structural analysis to determine whether the existing pavement is adequate to accommodate these Items. If it is adequate, then reconstruction will not be required, D, Engineering Condition No. 5 -Amethyst Street Storm Ora1n: "Construct portions of the City Master Plan Storm Drain line 2-J 1n Amethyst Street, Base Line Read, and dl ang the Southern Pacific railroad tracks t0 meet the City project at or west of Hellman Avenue, as determined by a final drainage report approved Dy the City Engineer. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facilities ( `j 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENT TRACT 14192 - RIX DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 4 and the Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City Policy." The required storm drain improvements for the protect are shown on Exhibit "E". The Developer has not obtetted to the line in Neuman Avenue; however, he has obtected to the one in Amethyst Street which extends from the site to near Vineyard Avenue along the Southern Paeific Railroad (SPRR). This line was required in confoneance with standard policy that when a protect contributes runoff to an area that does rrot have the capacity to accept the additional flow and a City Master Plan line Ts designated for that area, the development is conditioned to construct the master plan line. The Developer will be elTgtble for fee credit and reimbursement for the cost of the line. As noted on Exhibit "E", the City plans to construct the portion of the storm drain along the railroad up to Heilnan Avenue during the 91/92 fiscal year. If the Developer watts for the City to complete this work, it will greatiy reduce the portion he has to construct. The Developer provided a preliminary hydrology study to support his claim that the increase 1n flows to Amethyst Street due to development of this protect is 1ns1gnlfTcant. According to that study, the runoff from a 100-year stone would exceed the street right-of-way downstream of the protect (near La Grange Street) in the existing condition; therefore, any increase due to development will aggrevate an existing problem. Staff is concerned that the existing situation may be worse than what ie nnrtraywl alvao ~h.~ , ..~.n.er ~f properties along Amethyst Street tack a~ coagriece parkway for protection. The Developer contends that he 1s being treated unfairiy, because his protect will contribute only a minor additional flow (13 cfs) to Amethyst Street as compared to 18T cfs directed to the street by the City's 19th Street protect currently under construction. It is true that the City protect will interlmly direct additional flow to Amethyst Street. This of course was not the original intention when the protect was budgeted. An exptanatton of the circumstances causing tMs condition is contained 1n the attached memo from Mike Olivier to Barrye Hanson dated August 8, 1990. Mr. Olivier is currently developing Dlans La reduce the impacts of the City protect on Amethyst Street. /~ 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENT TRACT 14192 - NIX DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 5 Re/spectf/ul l y Qsub~m~i tted, SB:BAM:dIw Attachments: Appeal Letters Exhibit "A" - Yicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Nell man Street Nldening Exhibit "D" - Nellman Utilities Map Exhibit "E" - Storm Drain Requtrements Exhibit "F" - Capital Protect Scheduling Memo Planning Caawission Staff Report, Resolution and Mtnutes Resolution of Genial /~3 1""e] voN n..e RAN, ro~erN noo" ~IRVIN L. ULIFOR NIA B3)I]-1]B1 mo"o"r m+~ ]d-uu ~~i~conw nl+l eeseaee w ~~,,J/ _~[! O_ noon July 6, 1990 " 0 o aa oae .o _ . ~ . F , ~ ......n .. ws M3923-0aT 737/2BN5 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: City Clerk De o1 e. ,_ ~~~~~ ,-, „~, `jv-vim uai.au June"27, 1990 ("Resolution")Vapprovinq Tentative Tract No. 14192 (the "Tentative Map"); Hiz npvuinnmpnt Carp, Ladies and Gentlemen: On behalf of Hiz Development Corp. ("Hi:"), this letter constitutes a formal protest and appeal of certain conditions to approval of the Tentative Map set forth in the Resolution. This Notice of Protest and Appeal is being delivered for the purposes of ezhausting the administrative remedies of Hiz with respect to the protest and appeal of such conditians. Hiz hereby protests and appeals the conditions numbered (1) (3), (5) a,^.d (11) undar the eeiCtion of the Resoiution entitled "Engineering Division" (collectively, the 'Conditions"). :tt is the contention of Hiz that the improvements required to be constructed pursuant to the Conditions ("Improvements") are not appropriate, in that a subdivider is only required to construct or install such improvements "as are necessary for the general use of the lot owners in the A, i.nx, Mwxxzxs. Lace, Gwx33ta & Mnr.7.oav lUy LAW OF FICC9 ALLEN, MAT%naa. LEC%, GAMBLE Bc MALLORY 4 P/.RTN Cpg MIp IN LLO DING ppO iES gIO N1L CONPOPGTIO NS City of Rancho Cucamonga July 6, 1990 Page 2 subdivision and local neighborhood traffic and drainage needs." California Government Code ("CGC") Section 66419(a); La Canada Flintridge Dev loom n o v lifornia D n r *~ Transportation 166 Ca1.App.3d 206 (1985). It is further the contention of Hiz that the Improvements are not "reasonably related" to the public need or burden that the proposed development creates or to which it contributes. Hollan v. California ~=ct=~ r„p1„1 107 S.Ct. 3191 (1987). The least related and most ezpensive of the Improvements are those described in Condition no. (5), the requirement that Hiz construct portions of the City Master Plan Storm Drain line in Amethyst Street, Base Line Road and along the Southern Pacific railroad tracks to meet the City project at or west of Hellman Avenue ("City Project"). Interviews with residents in the vicinity of the Hiz project have indicated that there has never been a significant flooding problem on Amethyst Street. In fact, a study conducted at the request of Hiz indicates that the water flow generated by the Hiz project would De negligible. Such study, prepared by Horris-Repke, inc., will be forwarded to the City Engineering Division on or about the date of this letter. Whether or not Hiz will be eligible for reimbursement of the costs relatinn to rnnah n,rf:nn ,.F c...r. ,,,....,........_~_ Improvements themselves must still satisfy the criteriaydescribed in the preceding paragraph. Si@g CGC Sections fi6485 and 66496. Thereicre, Eor the legal reasons identified above, the conditions to approval of the Tentative Map set forth in the Resolution under the "Engineering Division' section as conditions number (1), (3), (5) and (11) are hereby protested and appealed. Respectively submitte , Richard E. Stinehart RES:Ciw cc: Mr. Hob Yoder, General Manager, Hiz Development Corp. /yS cc . 5 II~ FiIX DEVELOPMENT CORP. ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~F1f1?1'111Y~ry1~1 July 13, 1990 IIL{RI~LY City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 41730 Attention: City Clerk RE: Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-85 dated June 27, 1990 approving Tentative Tract No. 14192; Hix Development Corp. Dear City Clerk: We hereby extend the period within which our appeal (Piled July 6, 1990) must be heard by the City Council. Our understanding is that the appeal moat be heard aithin 30 days of its Piling and wa wish to extend that period by an additional 30 days. The purpose for this extension is to allow the Engineering Staff an opportunity to review a study of the Amethyst Drainage Area conduct¢d by Norris-Repke, Inc. The study shall be presented direct to them on this date, with a copy of this letter. sin//c~ el~y/ry//A7., n _ Bob Y ae~y ~ General anager cc: Betty Hiller, Engineering Department ~yb 437 south Catuad Avenue • Sulk 3 • SIn Duna, Califomie 91773 • (714) 599.8167 • FAX (714) 5925010 II~ HiX DEVELOPMENT CORP. August 14, 1990 Jack Lam, AICP City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tentative Tract 14192 Dear Mr. Lam: ~tECE1VEQ AuG t r; )99Q CIIY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION This latter is in an attempt to clarify our position with respect to our appeal filed July 6, 1990 regarding Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-85. Our contention is that certain conditions, as previously outlined in the appeal, are being imposed on our development illegally and unfairly. We have not been shown what legal basis there is for associating these additional and excessive conditions with our project. One area of disagreement is in regards to the requirement for storm drain improvements in Amethyst Avenue and continuing downstream. In this case a clear double standard is being applied. According to the Dlvieion of Engineering there is a policy that no development may take place if it negatively impacts a pre-existing downstream problem. We have been told that no matter how small our impact on the drainage situation in Amethyst, we must construct all City master planned storm drainage tacilitiea prior to any development. At the same time the City has proceeded with a street improvement proiact in Amethyst north of our 3avalopmont, the net result oL which will create an additional 198 CFS flow in Amethyst (compared to 10 CFS !or our project). This is clearly in violation of the city's own policy. In a letter dated August 6, 1990 trom the Engineering Division thi^ vas justified since it is a "temporary condition which will be eliminated upon completion oL all planned City projects ~7 Pegs 1 of 7 437 South Catarael Avenue • Sulk 3 • Son Dime, CalilomiA 91773 • (714) 5998161 • PAX (714) 5925010 upstream of the proposed tract". Our project, although shown to have inslgnif icant impact, is also a "temporary condition". In addition to the unfairness represented by the application of this double standard to our project, the study conducted by Norris-Repke clearly shows the impact of our development to be de minimus - the change in height of water flowing in the street in most cases is two hundredths of a foot and the volume of water flowing in the street exceeds right of way capacity well north of our project. The study also shows that the need for the mastor planned storm drains conditioned are not associated with flows generated by our project, but rather to handle flows generated from previously approved projects to the north. We have asked on numerous occasions, including the Planning Ccmmission hearings, on what legal basis are these requirements being made. The only answer we have been given is that these conditions are consistent with those made on other projects in the past. This is not a satisfactory answer. The cumulative effect of these extra requirements is to delay our project. Given the size of the project it cannot carry the associated coats of the improvements requested. The result of the Norris-Repko study shows that no one is benefited by delaying our project. The situation downstream of our project is virtually the same before and after our 3c.clarWa.-.t. iLa ,~~a„Li,~a ~i~e oily coots oe realizing valuable improvements including the completion of the storm drain in Hellman Avenue, and the widening of Hellman Avenue which would benefit many. Enclosed with this letter is our response to the Engineering Division's concerns regarding the hydrology studies as well as a copy of the revised Norris-Repko study. The other conditions we are appealing represent work outside of our tract bounderias. Once again when wa requested both in writing, and verbally to the Planning Commission, the legal baste for these conditions the only response given was that these type of conditions have been required of other develoPmanta. We are proceeding witR the engineering of our project without addressing the items we have appealed until wa are satisfied there is legal justification for their implementation. We will take whatever legal action i• necessary to protect our rights and insure that cur project begins in a timely manner. Page 2 of 3 7 V Please contact me ~if there are any questions or further clarification is needed. Your consideration of this matter is appreciated. Si{~cerely, i~..1. - ,/ ~- J/~ _~ Bob Yodet General Manager Enclos res cc: Betty Miller, Enqineerinq Division Jim Markman, City Attorney Mike Joyce, Allen, Matkins Page ] or 7 /7 / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIVEERING DIVISION env ®F ~~~~~~~ N ~; T T l y J 9 2 APAEAL ~~; V-CINITY MAP ~~~ ~~ Exl~rr: - /sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIQEERINCs DIVL4ION / "z//2~~00 /V ~; TT /S-/92 APD~AL T11'LE;'T~NTAT/VE MAP ERFIIBiT: " d „ /S/ u ,` .. ~;;o ~~ `_` ~~ :..'.; Y. , L_Tz. ~. ~~ ..' r~ :.-,~ ..~ Q. ~J ui -. ~: ~ 1 _ .:J ~~-'~ K' ~~~; w ;. I \\\ c --~- I `tom! ~W\ ryv,o' ~-'~~\ ~ ' "~-- Z ~ , L~ _ Q. SINK ,~~~, M a 0 ~` :.-n::....- -. P .... _ a' ~:. W -- _~`N O r-; ~' ~,' '4'\`d,~~ ~ b'1j ~a _~ ~ ~: ~,~ - ~ ; ~ ~~ N 4 4 Q > `~ T Q x ~ > i~ -¢~ .Z a~ ~V 2h d' O d' -~7 A U ~ C U ~a i ,V \L.~_~' ~-, i ' -~ . ~~~~ ^ ~. a ', ~.` .. . <`~ .n~ \~ 0 - N M ~ --~ I . r r" Ll ~ ~ -^ --_ 1 . 1 Qq ~ Q ~ ^ Q ~_ cA p ~ .2 ~ ; o ~~ 1 Z 2"'~J - . ~.,LL ~ O W _ O' Q x^ ,~ 4 L ~ Q _ {I N IJ I~ u Q 2 c f. _ ~~$ ., ~ a ~ ~ ', " ` ! ~ Q ~~ a W Q a ~ ~ Q / ~ ? F- .Q O a ` O U ~ U x z ~ ~ ~ ..~ ..~ f m-, ~~~ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVL9ION LEGEND OF STDRM DRAINS: - - - EXISTING REQUIRF~ OF PRt1.lECT W N ITEM: ~T 151192 APPFA L/51192 APPEA L ~,~; STOkM DRA/NS EXFIIBIT; E .. ls~ _ C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 8, 1990 T0: Barrye Hansen, Senior Civil Engineerh,~ sue. FROM: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer`tv`^~ SUBJECT: Capital Protect scheduling, budgeting and construction The Area II Amethyst Storm Drain Phase I from 19th Street to !iighland and the Lemon Storm Drain from Aita Loma Channel to Amethyst Avenue was included in the approved budget for the FTscal Year 89-90. The Amethyst Storm Drain was advertized far bids February 13, 1990, and award of contract was May 16, 1990. The Lemon Storm Drain was proceeding along the same time frame, except that processing through the San Bernardino County Flood Control is required for a permit to connect to Alta Loma Channel, a county facility. During the mid-year update of the 1989-90 budget in May, 1990, there were insufficient funds 1n the Drainage Funds Account to construct the Lemon Storm Drain. This shortfall to protected funds was mainly due to a downturn in development. Therefore in the mid year update of the 89-90 budget Lemon Drain was recotmtended to be re-budgeted in the Fiscal Year 1990-91 budget. Ynw _ A..nln In tpnn ..l- -J- .....F : ~y.~~3~~ i..' ,1~~ .) itYff AOi „Vl M1llly VII LIC final budget for Fiscal Year 1990-91 there were insufficient funds to re-budget the construction of Lemon Drain since most of the drainage funds were budgeted for construction of the Church Hermosa Drain during Fiscal Year 90-91. This is a very critlcai project since it relieves flooding south of Church Street. Also, the rggconstruction and improvement of Church Street from Archibald to paver. Avenues is contingent upon first constructing the Church Hermosa Storm Drain. When the 91-92 Fiscal Year budget was put together, most all of the drainage funds are being used for the construction of the Cucamonga Stornt Drains to Hellman Avenue. Construction of these drains to Hellman Avenue 1s very critical since there Ts potential for serious flooding downstream of Lhe S.P.R.R. if the Cucamonga Grains are not constructed to Hellman Avenue. This Left no drainage funds for the Lemon Drain 1n Fiscal Year ot_o~ Hopefully, enough drainage funds are genereted in the next two fears to re-budget funds for the construction of the Lemon Avenue Drain from Alta Lama Channel to Amethyst Avenue. I understand that Development Management Section has conditioned developers to construct portions of Exhi6~twF~~ /o~'e /SS MEMO TO BARRYE HANSEN CAPITAL PROJECT SCHEDULING AUGUST 8, 1990 PAGE 2 the Lemon Drain beginning at Alta Loma Channe' and proceeding westwardly. It Ts true that the Amethyst Drain and street improvenents presently under construction north of 19th Street do not collect flows tributary to the Lesion Avenue Storm Ora1n. This is 1~ conformance with our City's Master Drainage Map. When the Amethyst Drain and Street Improvements were designed the ditch on the east side ~rf Amethyst Street was eliminated so that Amethyst Street would meet the City's criteria for a safe street. As we construct portions of improvements within the Ctty based on funds available there are left certain temporary conditions at the terminus of said portions of improvements. This frequently occurs when constructing protects in phases. However, when the campiete systems are constructed according to the City's designated Master Plans these temporary conditions are eliminated. MC:Iy cc: Shlntu Rose Exh~'bif iit= ~~ 2of 2 /S6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 - HIX D Y LOPM N - A residential subdivision of 65 single family lots on 19.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located south of 19th Street between Helimnn and Amethyst Avenues - APN: 202-061-12, 14, 40, and 44. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading Plan, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. D. Pro.iect Density: 3.30 dwelling units per acre 3.40 dwelling units per acre (Alternate) C. Existin Land Use and Zon1n Na rth - ing a farm y residential; Low Residential District (2-4 dwellfng units per acre) South - Vacant, single family resi dental; Low Residential District (2-4 dwel U ng units per acre) East - Vacant, single family residential; low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and low' Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Mest - Single family residential; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Desi nations: ro,)ect ite - Low es dential RGi th - Law "neSid ent ial South - Low Residential East - Low Resfdential and Low-Medium Residential Nest - 'Low Resid entiai /5~ PLANNING COMMISSIG iTAFF REPORT TT 14192 - HIK DEVELOPMENT June 27, 1990 Page 2 Site Characteristics: The majority of the project site is vacant, however two existing single family homes are located within its boundaries. One of the structures, the lord House, is a designated Historical Landmark, the other structures is of na historical sf gnificance. Vegetation consists of eucalyptus and palm trees, various fruit and nut bearing trees, a lemon grove, and native grass and weeds. The s'.te is relatively flat, sloping approximately 3 to 3.5 percent from the northwest to the southeast II. ANALYSI~• A. General: The applicant is proposing a Tentative Tract Map consisting of a 65 lot subdivision with lots ranging fn size from 7,280 Square feet to 39,065 square feet with an average lot size of 9,208 square feet (See Exhibit "B"). The tract provides for the connection of three streets that currently dead-end into the project site: Mignonette Street, Kirkvaod Avenue, and Layton Street. Because of concerns expressed by adjacent property own er5 at a Neighborhood Meeting and through a formal petition filed against the Layton Street connection, the applicant submitted an alternate Tentative Tract Map. The petition (See Exhibit "H") was 5u bmitted by the residents of Layton Street objecting to the proposed extension of Layton Street into the tract. The alternate Tentative Tract Map proposes a 67 lot -'~ "'~-'-" '~" i~i.a ,anyiuy in nice irum i,2 oir square reel toy39,065~square feet with an average tot size of 9,161 square feet (See Exhibit "C"). The alternate map provides for the co nn ec tton of Mignonette Street and for Kirkwood Avenue and Layton Street to be retrofitted with reduced cul-de-sac bulbs south of the project site. This issue will he further discussed in Section F. B. Historic Preservation: Two residential structures are located within the boun cries of the project site (See Exhibit "0"). The Lord House, located at 6797 Hellman Avenue, is a designated Historical Landmark and will be preserved. The other structure located at 6898 Amethyst Street is of no historical significance and will be demolished. The His LJ riCai Pre se rva2100 GOmm15510n has nod LWO Separate opportunities to review the Lord House and its immediate surroundings. On May 5, 1988, the Historic Pre servatfon Commission reviewed a proposal to designate the Lord House a Historic landmark. The Historic Preservation Commission approved the designation recommending adoption by the City ~S~ PLANNING COMMISSION fAFF REPORT TT 14192 - H[% DEVELOPMENT June 27, 1990 Page 3 Council as both the structure and the site met the criteria of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. On June 15, 1988, the City Council adopted Resolution 88-405 designating the Lord House a Historic Landmark. During the Design Review Process, staff determined that the Lord House Historic Landmark designation pertained to the structure and its immediate surroundings but did net es*.ablish a buffering mechanism or determine a specific parcel size around the structure. On March 1, 1990, the Historic Preservation Commis Sion reviewed Landmark Alteration Permit 90-02 recommending to the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission adoption of a lot size and tract design around the structure that would not detract from its' historical significance. The tract has been revised to reflect design recommendations of the Historic Preservation Commission and the Design Review Committee. (See Exhibits "B" an4 "F"). C. Gra dine and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by both Committees and determined, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, to be in conformance with applicable standards and ordinances. D. Desi n Review Committee: On March 8, 1990, the Committee McNiel, Mein erger, and Coleman) reviewed the Droject and recommended approval with the faitowing comments: Ine lAmmlitee recommend ea tollOwing the alrectton of the Historic Preservation Commission to redesign the tract allowing for a greater buffer around the Lord House (See Exhibit "F"). The through street connections to Layton Street and Kirkwood Rvenue may possibly be closed, resulting in the additions of one or two additional lots, the final deletion of the through street connections will be determined by the Planning Commission. The recommendation from the Committee to the Planning Commission was to allow for the closure of Kirkwood Avenue and Layton Street. Tree Removal permit B4-5?: The applicant submitted a request for the removal of 41 trees of a total 122 trees 1n conjunction with the development of this tract. Of the total 41 trees, 16 of them cpnflict with street rights-of-way improvements for Hellman Avenue, Amethyst Street, and Street "D". The trees slated for removal Consist of Blue Gum and Red Gum Eucalyptus, California Pepper, and Avocado trees, as identtfted in Exhibits "G-1" through "6-5." X59 PLANNING COMMISSIU~ ,TAPE REPORT TT 14192 - HI% DEVELOPMENT June 21, 1990 Page 4 Extensive arborist studies were prepared to determine the health and condition of existing trees, and their suitability for preservation in place or through transplanting. Based on the arborist's report; staff is recommending preservation of all trees on the site of the Lord House. The Lord House site contains 73 trees including a variety of palm trees, Mulberry, Birch, Cedar, Elm; and Lemon *_rees. Eight trees located on the site are suitable to be transplanted ~a nd include two Canary Island Date Palm trees within the Hellman Avenue rights-of-way, one Mexican Fan Palm located within the Amethyst Street rights-of-way, one La na ry Island Date Palm located on Lot 23, three English Na lout trees located on Lots 9 and 23, and one Lemon Scented bum Eucalyptus located on Lot 41. Tyro alternatives are provided for the Lemon Scented bum Eucalyptus: either transplant within the projer:t site or preserve-in-place should the alternate tract map be approved. A total of 20 trees located within the tract are exempt from the provisions of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. These trees include Lemon> Avocado, Persi moon, Fig, and Peach trees; and staff recommends their removal. A detafled listing of each tree is shown on Exhibit "G". Eng ineer ino Division Comeents: The project proposes to extend all three of the ez isti ng streets which currently dead-end into the project boundaries. This was obviously the original in ce nc wnen Lne suoaly is ions wnere constructed, since the streets were not terminated in standard cul-de-sac bulbs. As is to be expected, residents on all three streets have indicated, that they do mat want the streets ez tend ed because they fear it will Tncrease traffic. A traffic study 6y the d evelooer shows that traffic at the east end of Mignonette Street and the south end of Layton Street would actually decrease if all three are extended, since two means of access sill be avatlaDle to existing residents. Through traffic is exDec ted to be negligible due to indirect routing. In response to the residents' concerns, the developer has provided an alternate plan with Layton Street and Kirkwood Avenue not extended. Mignonette Street currently exceeds the 600 foot maximum for a cul-de-sac, sa it will be extended under both alternat;ves. The developer prefers the aiiernative design because it will yfeld two adEitional lots, and will not require the installation of storm drains in Layton Street and Monte Vista Street. ! ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION .TAPE REPORT iT 14192 - NIX DEVELOPMENT ~. June 27, 1990 Page 5 Staff recommends the design which extends the streets because: (') the streets were originally designed to be extended, (2) dead-end streets should be terminated with a standard cul-de- sac bulb to allow proper turn around wh ieh is not possible for the exfsting streets, (3) extension of the streets will disperse traffic more evenly to several streets and not unfairly concentrate ft on one street, (4) it allows general traffic and emergency vehicles two means of access, and (S) it allows a reduction in the grade difference between the new homes and the existing homes to the south. There are exfsting storm drain defic ienc ie5 downstream of the proj a:t site, therefore, the project has been conditioned to install the necessary Master Plan Storm Drains. The aD Plic ant argues that development of this site only marginally increases the run-off and therefore the conditions are excessive. Staff feels that increasing run-off to an existing system which cannot ce nta in this flow is unacceptable, aM this requirement to construct Master Plan lines is consistent with City policy. Also, the developer will be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of the Master Plan lines. (Engineering staff will be at the meeting to answer questions of the Planning Commission.) III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp eted by the app cant. Staff has completed Part II of the Env irmnmen cai i.necxitst: anm no stgntncant impacts on the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. IV. FACTS fOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Cade. The project, with the added mitiga lion measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisance or significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed Site Plan, together with recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. 1. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Nearing in hTe Bland Valley Daily Bulletin, the property pasted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Two adjacent re std ants submitted writ*_en opposi ties to the proposed subdivision, their comments have been attached (See Exhibit "I"). l4/ PLANNING LOMMISSI Oi .TAPE REPORT TT 14192 - HIX DEVELOPMENT June 27, 1990 Page 6 YI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has included two Resolutions of pprovJl al. One is for a 65 lot subdivision and the other one for a 67 lot subdivision. Staff recommends tfoe Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 14192, for a 65 lot subdivision, through adoption of one of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Re so lly s itt¢d, Bra City ann BB:iG:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Alternate Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Alternate Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - HPC Recommendations Exhibit "6" - Tree Removal Permit 89-67 Exhibit "H" - Petit tan Opposing Street Connection Exhibit "I" - Letters of Opposition Resolution of Approval for 65 Lot Subdivision Resolution of Approval for 67 Lot Subdivision ~/ l .~~ ^~C 7j' --~. ILA c _ ~- ~1--- -~---~ _ ~ W ~' 1"-C- 1~ ~~ ~._.t_ <...~ ...__...J _,,,i. ~~~ ~:' -,i ~~' ~ ° -nom--~,~ ~~ ,,~.. ~-~ ~..~~,~.~~ ITEM: _ CI'I1' OF F}A1SiC1'~C3..~UCAMONGA TITLE: N PLANNtIYG- AYVIS[ON ~ A EXHIBIT: ~ SCALE: /G3 ,= J t I ' !, I L~ o ~ . , ;!I°; s I ' 1 ~.t -1 t I ?. it . -~ ! „ li T 1 ! i~~ ~+ ~ i i , t .. .~~~`w)... ~ 'i ~~ t ~ j ~ i'. t t. "~i ,i ..i !' tF~l i t ;~. ; l ; R ~~ ~ 1 ~. ~.~ 1, t. f'.~ 11 f' r - l ~- ~~ ~ ~~~-- ~~~ti ~z t t + t ~,!U ~.~ , ~. i .~. ~ i~ _4:: i iL'_. ~ I. 1_l. ~ I~ {.1 , ~~ 11t I 1.-1_ .~ „ F~ :1 t Vii; -'- I j L Wit' t• ~ 't'U !.. t t ~ . -:~ =-~, + ~~ ~~, ~ - r- ~: .,. ;~„•~,; , ~~ i I. p x Icy a U y ~` ~ U 1hY ~~ ~~~ ~~ .a ,~ c , ^c~ , ! ~r \~, J./~ Lr .-- n ' ~? ,~ ~~ :~. ; na'~i ~' . ,; ~;"' '~ ~ +'I ~(•r~ ~ i ~^ ~ ~9r i t, /6 ~ z U l u u u u u ~-r u.~~ I ; .~. tl 'a~~~_ ;: ;:Q ~. fl I ~.~' ~/ ..i.• I.~I~ -.~-.. - '~. 1 ~_ 5 _ ~k-gl ~ _ - _ _ ~= . . I; , ;~;r Y t ~'~ t` roj ~ 1 ', ~; }_ „~+h, Ilv. "~ 4 ~`,~4 f e ,. .~ -~ I ~:I ~..'; ~~. =~~ ,. I r--~^~. a ~ , 1 a v i ~~~ ~ w v JI ~ i ~I' I"~ 'q < ~ ~ , ~~e x ~v« ~ s e~ ! ~ N - : 4-~ ~~1 Y } 0 . ~Z ~;~ L~ !'+ LW ?J ~ ~; I r ;: ~~ ~c~ /~ I\^~ ~~///ate ~f ~`~ % -~ ~i~~~~~~a n~ U .;,. ;~, ,~ ~~~ 1 ,, ,~ . . ` .I~ lf ~ i 1 i. 4 ' I it ~ ' r'~ ~ ~I ~ ~ \. \ ~ ~ . . `~ ----ii . lad ~r ~ F l :,. i , ~; ~ .mil ,l '. ! t ~ t' '. F ~ i .l. s 1 (..~lR \ : . s ~ C~ '_ i v~`/ J n ~i, 1~ F ...} :, r'.:. ~ ~ 1, l 1 \ ' 1~ l ~ I \.~ i ~ I i I t . I Tl III"' 1 ~ --- i .~~ , a ~ _~ ~~.~ 3 ?' ,. - 1~ s ; ' ~ > ~s, p. R d ;t `~, - ~ ~. „ , . • ~ 1 ~I , ~ .: ~ I l ~y7. ~I 1 ~: _ ~IU.. i ,,.~;.;., Vi'a' -r'---- i; .r.- l .. -~ ~ .~ ~ .1 ' . ., liv F~, `-~yZ--r-.--r•H i ~\-~ ~ , r MI .~ .~_~'~~ l 3 ~ ' ~1 '1 ~.Il,J ..II i _ i. l i .'I I~ .i i ti .~1 1: • ~ 1 1f 1 ~f ~1' -i I ~t5tlll~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ x ~~ ~~ U `~ 7 x ~~ t {~ ~ s C F W 1. U .~(v P J ~~.L ~ ~, ! n ~ ~ ~~ ~i ~ ii /I = i r y ,, t 'j ~ ~± A: v ~ r ~ ~ ~~1i `f i~•~ ~~ a~, ~ ) 3; ~ s x ~~ ~ :.; '''""' ;~ ~ ,~ ~. ~~~iSJI7 I ~ ~~F ~~' n III ~' ~~b i i 1~1V~~ _~ , ~.~_ ;~~, i /~ i?'~, ~/ h _ ~ ;. ,. r AI .`1`"I x _~ U /~~ ~, ~~ , - 1:, , _ 1 :1 1 -~ ." ~j ~'~~r j~ . .., .: I - ~~; I Q , . ~ -- ~I r L~ _ ~.: 1t I r~ ~ e~~ ~ I q ~ P ~ 11 ~ I t ` r I t~ I, 1 1 ~. ;III r~~ f y \'' ~i~~ „ ~,a 1 i ~l ..1 i:Pd r•~-.~~. t.JCa ,/.e. •~. ~ la.,~\ ~ ~' t i `~ r S 4 ,..,, ~ 'r 111 ~.: C I '' .4 b _ i1, ' t ! ~ d-1 _- ~ ~ I :,I• 1 1, r~ I ~ 1 I r'.~~~ ~~' b 'd ~I ~r,'7 / .I'.~~1'~ P / (~~ ~ r~l 1' - ,'tip- r ,.n.,n.; Y: ~ ~1. ~; ~1I ~\~ i~ 4 ~/Ar lrI ~~ , Wry 1:~~I°I \ -ic*.hJ~;Ei. I .,~. ~,,, „ ~..~ .,,c .~ ,: .:. ,I ... ~„ ~, i_ ~cg~ ~ .:r ~'~r4i„~"'1~ trt `'i Il'-i` .r : {_. ~ 1~.I~IKd`tl ~ z I U N 1 rid ~I i ~• l -. ~~~; _ ~ !.,. ~ ~~., 1 ' c i i j 1 "~` r~ 1 e .~ .~-,`~~ -r -- ~'r ~ ...i 4 a~ ~:#, ~7~ ~,1. p.,~l ~'J 1 .a t M ~ ~ r~~: ~. 5i ~i i ~~::' ~~~ \\\ 1 ,.may :'~~. ..: 1 i~ A \~'~ z ~V ~c1 ~ x C F U ~: ~,-~ .i ~, ~ ~ ~-. l '. jby'. 1 _ l c 1> ICY JI`J` - " n~ 1 ~ ~ l ~ , ~`m I -J 1.~Q° 0 ~ ~-~=' T~~ j~~I y ~, ' "` ~ . ~ `f ~_1 z -~ ~~ U 17~- :, ,, ~ . 1 ~._..~ ~i!1' 4, 1 ~~ t l l l ti\ ~~I I/ -; „ 4 -t ~~ - ~, .~ _ - ~ ~ i ~t \~ 1f'1. J 1 1 ~1`}~~ ~ '~ 'I ~ ~ ~.:~ 1 ~ .4., ~; ..~~. .~ ..~ ,. ~r ~ ! .~ i, / 73 ~~ 4 _- I~ ~'t i I LI I r, I~ f i. \\ z I V ~-1~ ~~ U I - i It.~ ( ,~ U -J ~i ~i 1~ ~-1~ C O ~ I ,~ `I e ~~ v. ~ i Jp~ ~~rl i~'IIrL Tfl o ~ L 1 v ~ 1 ~~~ Q ~~ '~; ~~~i~'~ 6 7~ J ~•~~ x U V wap~p z =~~ ~ ~~ ~~y ~ ~ F W U 76 TENTATIVE TRACT 10192 HELLMAN AND AMETHYST. SOUTH OF 19TH Prepared by Barry Tree Cace NUMBER COMMON NAME RECOMMENDATIONS '1"A 1 BLUE GUM PRESERVE IN-PLACE '.~'~'" 2 BLUE GUM PRESERVE IN-PWCE -yr -yc 3 BLUE GUM PRESERVE IN-P LACE ~t-,jt 9 BLUE GUM PRESERVE IN-PWCE ~'i''~" 5 BLUE GUM PRESERVE IN-PWCE -rt 6 MEXICAN FAN PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT ~F~ 7 CALIFORNIA PEPPER REMOVE BECAUSE OP SAZARD ~--RB CAL IPORNIA PEPPER PRESERVE OR TRANSP WNT -~c ~E -y~ 9 AVOCMO REMOVE EECAUSB OP POOR BEALTH iF* 10 CALIFORNIA PEPPER PRESERVE IN-PWCB 'k'-7t 11 CALIFORNIA PEPPER PRESERVE IN-P WCE AFTER PRUNING '~"~ 12 CALIFORNIA PEPPER PRESERVE IN-PWCE jE'13 LEMON-SCENTED GUM PRESERVE IN-PWCE -It=lt-~ 1{ BLUE GUM PRESERVE IM-PWCE AFTER PRUNING ~f'F.lf' 15 SLUE GUM REMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR BEALTH -/c-]c 16 BLUE GUM REMOVE BECAUSE OF DEATR '1~~C 17 BLUE GOM PRESERVE IN-P WCE AFTER PRUNING shit 18 SYBERIAN ELN REMOVE EECAUSB OF BAZAAR ~!c-}l 19 RED CUM PRESERVB OR TRANSPLANT 20 CANARY IS. DATE PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSP WNT ~.jt 21 RED GUM inoosnvG UR TRANSPWNT 22 CANARY TS. DATE PALM PRESERVE OR TAAN3PWNT 3t- 23 CANARY I3. DATE PALM PRESERVE OR TRAN SPWNT aE- 24 CANARY IS. DATE PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT 25 CALIFORNIA PAN PALM PRBSERVE OR TRANSPWNT 26 CALIFORNIA PAN PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT 27 CALIFORNIA PAN PALM PRESERVE IN-PWCE 28 CANARY IS. DATE PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSP WNT 29 CALIFORNIA FAN PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSP WNT 30 CALIFORNIA PAN PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT 31 CANARY I3. DATE PALM PRBSERVE OR TRANSPWNT 32 CALIFORNIA PAN PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT 33 CALIFORNIA PAN PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT 31 CALIFORNIA PAN PALM PRESERVE OR TRANBP WNT 35 CALIFORNIA PAN PALM PRESERVE oR TPAN$PLANT 3d CAI.ARY I$. DATE PALM PRESERVB OR TRAN3PWNT 37 CANARY 25. DATE PALM PRESERVE OA TRANSPWNT ~4-x9t 38 PERSIMMON PRESERVE OR TiUN3PWNT 39 JAPANESE PLUM PRESERVE ONLY NO TRANSPWNT ~'c 10 CANARY IS. DATE PALM PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT -~c~1'1t I1 LEMON PRESERVE ONLY NO TRANSP WNT iF9F~E12 LEMON PRESERVE OR TAANSP WNT m~lt-YC13 LEMON PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT ~4'fE'fF/1 LEMON PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT ~-}t15 LEMON PRBSERVE OR TRANSPWNT y I~ ~~ ~y ~ ~.XN't$ rr - ^" l 7 / 7 NUMBER COHMON NAME '~',~~`, 46 LEMON 47 LEMON 4E LEMON -Yc'/o-~ 49 LEMON 'k'k~E 50 LEMON ~ j~ 51 LEMON ~i'lE if 52 LEMON -j'i~~53 LEMON .*~-~E64 LEMON 'k 55 ENGLISH WALNUT ~c'~ 56 AVOCADO 57 CANARY IS. DATE PALM ~SE LEMON 'h~'c~k 59 BLUE GUM -}f'k+k 60 AVOCADO -,~"/~'>;'61 AVOCADO -`/s-Yc iE 62 EDIBLE FIG 63 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 64 CHINESE ELM -~i 65 ENGLISH WALNUT X66 ENGLISR WALNUT ~{-Mc'~E 67 PEACH 9EjE 68 AVOCADO -7F~jE 69 AVOCADO RECOMMENDATIONS PRESBRVE ONLY, NO TRANSP WNT PRESERVE OR TRANSP WNT PRESERVE OR TIiANSP WNT REMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR pEALTp REMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR pEALTp REMOVE BECAUSE OP DBCLINING REALTH REMOVE EECAUSB OF POOR HEALTH REMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR pEALTp R ENOVB BECAUSE OP POOR SEALTH PRBSERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE ONLY, NO TRANSP WNT REMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR HEALTH RBMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR HEALTH PRESERVB ONLY, NO TRANSPLANT PRESERVE ONLY, NO TRANSP WNT PRBSBRVB ONLY. NO TRAN3P WNT R BMOVE BECAUBB OP POOR STRUCTURE PRESERVE OR TRANSP WNT PRESERVE OR TRANBPWNT PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT PAESBRVE OR TRANSPWNT PRESBRVB OR TAANSPWNT PRESBRVB OR TRANSPLANT PRESBRVB ONLY, NO TRANSPWNT ;G.::::.,~d; aces iocatea on the Lord Have site: 1 Canary Island Date Palm 7 Mexican Fan Palm 3 Mulberry 1 Birch 1 Deodar 1 Chinese Elm 1 Eucalyptus 38 Lemon n t~o4''a~lUvl - f /B~F(ll~ IN ~~ikCQ 'f. '1C - ~iMU~4. 041f. '~' '~-1~~1~'~U~-Ui~1 IrL~~dVQ,YN2Ul~7 ~ 7 8~ ~.IcH1Glt ~~12 N ~ ~ • • • 91 / ~` N ~ ~ ~ `4 ~J '~ r + ~ I G M i N I J ~ • ,,, ~ ~~ • ~ ~ ~• ` • •~ ~ ~~ : ~ ~ 1 ~ . : ? : 1 NI : ~ i ~~•= ~ 4 O 11 IH N Iv, • 1 V Y I ~11~ Ia~ •~ IY • • W• I `I r •iw i • •~• • " 7F 1 ~ • J N R L ~ N i f ~ 4 ~ N N NVW't'1311 / 7? z i U ~. N d 7 v Q z 151J113Wd ~' N ~ r m • \ ~_ ~ .. ---- ~ _U ~~~ ~ ~ m ~ I ~ • • ~ ~` ~~ T ~Yo No1-h`t'I U l ~d 4 u~ u ~'3~~1h ~ ~ s ~~ 8 ~ N U ~~ 1~ NYW'1~3F1 (O/ z U e Mgr .133dYv '•"IA gAGOS Rc BELLI~'G ER .2~Yav,~'s aC .~ ~~_ _. _ e__. ~:_~ seo ..cs- s,~.,so, o,c._. ,.~ _ oe _.. _._~ _ - _e. .~=v~. a_zm ~ . August 21, 1989 CTf, Mr. Larry McNiel Chair, Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road 'M Suite Mc P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: JayGQn_Street - Victoria street Llianment Dear Mr. McNiel: :i Attached you will find a petition on behalf of the residents of the 6900 block of Layton Street, of which I am a resident, imploring the Planning Commission and the City Engineering Department to reconsider its plan to align Layton Street with the proposed Victoria Street, a part of HIX Development. on August 7, 1989, I, along with many oL my neighbors on the 6900 block of Layton Street, attended the hearing on the HIX Development which was held at the Lions Community Center. At that time we were advised of the City~s plan to align r ao~.. a«~ .. ~. ., ~ ., -- - --=- ~~~~ ~ ~~- ~ ~~ieo ~. a„u wb WaLb bnown a map OT the proposed development ~~ In looking over the proposed map of this azea, we noted that the opening of Layton Street to victoria street was distinctly unnecessary since there were adequate alternate routes out of the development by way of Hellman and Amethyst Streets, end the development would seek to gain very little access to the surrounding neighborhoods by the proposed alignment of Layton Street with Victoria Street. As you can sae from the petition, one of our main concerns in opening this street is the fact that so many children reside in the 14 homes on the 6900 block of Layton Street and wa era tearful for their safety should the street become a through street, Additionally, ws aro also concerned with the increase of crime in our neighbozhood which might well result from making Layton Street a through street to Victoria. we would like to point out, however, that the Hicks Development would gain with an additional lot upon which to build a home for the Victoria Street residents if Layton Street was left in its present status. ~rr8,9~>. a.. ~cr~'r " t1i" /~- ~IARAGOS & HELL!\GER .~~~ ~ Mr. Larry McNiel August 21, 1989 Re: Layton Street - Victoria Street Alignment Page 2 As a resident of this block and concerned citizen in this matter, I have agreed to communicate with you and present this petition on behalf of the 14 homes on this block. Should you wish any further information from our neighborhood concerning this matter, please Leel free to contact me at my Los Angeles office listed above, or in the alternative, you may leave a message at my home office, area code (714) 944-5302. Thank you for taking the time to consider this matter and we hope that you will give it your immediate attention. Vary truly yours, M~A'Ry!AGOS i BELLINfGJE~R MARTHA E. BELLINGER x927 Layton Strait Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 MEB/kgh LaytonSt.2L Enclosure `{~ A2 P6-7z /~3 ~t~~T ,l~n -~!P : FR 8P-Pz PEi1TION i0 ~0.Ev E'v; ThE PL'ONMENt OF L!rE 69 ^.; BLDCK OF tavTON STREET wIT~ `iI~TOR L4 STREEi, A PRGPOSED STREET FOR THG HIX DE`I.~_OPMENT we the undersigned residents of the 6900 d1ncK of Layton Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga, dohereby respectfully aeriticn the ?lanning Commission of Rancho Cucamonga to rescind its cla r, align Layton Street with the proposed Victoria Street, a Dart of hiIX Development. This P°-tition i< predicated upon Lhe fact that neignbornocd safety will be severely jeopartlizea by making Layton Street a lnrougn street since approximately 25 children under the age pf 18 r=side on the 69uu black of Layton Street and would be subject to the dangers of increased traffic, wn ich would naturally occur from opening the street. Additionally, little apcears to be gained by opening Layton Street to the plan r.ed Victoria Street location since residents of Victoria Street will have access to Hellmar avenue antl Rme thyst Street by mote convenient routes out of the HIx Development. Third, most cf the current residents of the 6900 block of Layton Street have resided on this block since the inception of the Jensen Tract. Our ing that period of time, not one burglary Or serious Crime has occurred on the street and we feel this is attributable to the fact the block dead ends. 'rle are gravely concerned that opening up Layton Street will increase the crime to our black. while the City appears to have some concern that i_ is uns of=_ to have ewEiC^^~v vehicles and trash disposal trucks backing down the street due to its ucod =^d, dui ing the 12-year. existe^ce of the street not one injury has occurreo a~ - ._ ~~~t. ..f this fe attire, although nUmerOUS Children have ieeided Onethe b 10Ck. ~inaily, the HIx development would benefit by keeping the 6900 block of Layton Street closed since it would gain an additicnal building lot for its development. T V'm f.QG~ Q' ~ C fX^• signature ~og2"1 ~Pyjov~ S1'• address i /L. • Yx.o.:.~...t~ u.~z~ mac. ~..%.,~':.:,~..,,. 51 ^yndtuie, signature ( %up i ` ~c~ yr ' a~.ese ~ dress ~~ ~8~ ~x~~T ~~ ~~~ signature -- address signature ~- addres i ~ i signature address signature address s igna , e Fi?! .~i'y~~ ~~~ atldress r, signature ~.~i7 Ff-V fl,ni 3r, addr s~ cis ~' r r ' ~.%~.; `~~/-~; J : -%<'c.E~c.i ~~tE`-r<:. / 9C ~ ,Csp~72.u 5 i signature ~~ address signature ~ ad _ss tel. -r /! „- .~u ~, ~ l„~,~ />'i ~~, ~~,, T,,;. ~ signature 'T ~ ~ a~res~- v i .: `. signature atldr s ,1 ~ 'i ^ature~~ a'~'2s- oArEO: (,/t[~uaj dl,,145'9 l 6~ ~~ 11I'~n /GlSGG C;~/~;~i L~'r~it,,~i2o~,~i ~jfl~7L'~C ~rL'~`f/ylC~J~ /l'~ ~~'t . i // •~ `r/ ' f ~in97~7i/i .~ ~'C~%%i%i~,c~~/~~ 9 tyro -6ECEiVcU- cmroF ea-~ocucaMOnc a~n;nrr. or~~.~. ,5;~;:~, ,_,_, ,3,~ Ge,L:~c. .Li7`GlLY'~ !Z ~ G~~ 4s .~:'7-v ,~ c~G7~i/r~FifiC~i, hl/~.~ ~~~~~ ~/~~~~ ~~G~ "~ ~i7 ri i ~ i Sri i ii i <~ . , i rLi ~i..r .~ i .. ~ ri i i~ i ~fx=~C/ ll/CC i ~~~ciJ~~IU~.~~1~c~.x _/ ~~tJ ~~~~; i~~ ~.s lv r~~~ ~~ ~~ uG/O/~~~/f`~Gl/z/ /~~/~l r~G~ ~~~~/~%i ~ ~~ //~ -~/~~~~".~~~~~~ lv ~ r ~ l) ~:~~5 ~ ,, i / ~~~u~ ri~~evl-~ ~ Lf ~-a~F~ ~~"irJ~~n'f !zel.~/J ~CIiIJ~~ Cj~E''o~2~et %~ %p~z~s ~o ~ ~ti~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ z~ /,5. ~ ~ ~hs~ lam' CCU C~ ~-l ~ ~/u~~~~ /8 ~ F,xtti~t7 " I ~ lc~fl~i/z~ Gu~/~c~a~i G~~~~ Gr% /»G~~ t~ fir! 7i'.i,~i'~~ c~%~'c~ /ljf~~fc~l"zC7'C%, l ~~ FxN~R ^ ~ 3. ~ ' FRANK PENN'S MAGIC LAMP INN 8'99 Face ~~ a„ ; _., ., o^aa, C ~.:. 9!:30 ~3n C..^.O ~~l C3mCnP3 ?ldnnln3 ~7Tmi 99inn Y " 90% "!~~ 7ancho L a:mngs ra June 3 1990 ~~~~ 'o whom :; may concern. ~:e 'cave lived in 5liamnnga since Sept. 195d, de 3o not need any more congestion in cur nei3hbor hood, As every one we'_i Imow ve are supposed Lo be near our limit on valet, streets, and highways, e are very ouch opposed to the addition of 65 homes of this pro,l ect, They put in ne~+ lams, trees, and said in the paper several weeks ago there were 9000 new homes under constzuction. That means more schools to De built, taxes are ao high now acme people that have lived here many years are having, to sell and move else where, ae I eee St we finish the homes that are started all over Cucamonga, Ftiwanda, it is just too many people after q ?M you can not move at the si goals for the traffic hacked up. I have Been St on Rase'_ine backed up almost to carnelian. Same on Foothill from 7lneyard almost to Lhe Lamp. 'W.ewnuld be at the meeting, but my husband hae had Radiation for several monthe, and is °ti. ::- ~/ /~ ~ ~. ~ ~ , /~~ j ~~ ,, i85 <„ ~~ e~ n ;? RESC LU TI ON NC. 90-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMPASSION OF THE LITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 14192, A,R ES IDENTI AL SURDIV[SION Of 65 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 19.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 19TH STREET G ETN EEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND AMETHYST AVENUE IN THE LON RESIDENTIAL DiSTR ILT !2-4 Dw EL LING UNITS PER ACRE1 AND MAKING FI NOI NGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-061 -12, 14, 40 AND 44. A. Recitals. (i) Hiz Development has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14192 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the su b,iect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "t:he application." !ii) On the 27 to of June 1990 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and cane lu dad said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOIV, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Ra ntho Cucamonga as follows; 1. 7h ie rn mm:~ein. Fero6_„ ,,..+s+--n.. e ••~ ~+~d; thai. oil ui Liie is u[s set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. ? Based upon su bsta ntfal evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 27, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby sp ecifkaliy finds as fol to w5: (a) The application applies to property located south of l9th Street between Hellman aM Amethyst Avenues at the termination of Mignonette Street, Kirkwood Avenue and Layton Street with a street frontage of 746 feet along Hellman Avenue and 330 feet along Amethyst Avenue; and (b) The Lord House, located at 6797 Hellman Avenue is a Designated Historic Landmark and will be preserved; and !c) The property to the north contafns single family homes, to the east are single family homes and vacant property, to the south is vacant property and single family homes, and to the west are stogie family homes. / ~~ TT 11192 - HIX DEVEI 'ENT June 27, 1990 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Co mmis lion during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 7. above, this Commission hereby fin d5 and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is cons is *_ent with the General Pia n, Development Code, and specific plans; and (bl The design or i.-.,p rcve~ae r,t5 cf the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically su iia6le for the type of development p roposeA; and substantial env ronmen tad esdia magefa ndh avo idah le sin ju ry to oho man sea nd wildlife or Ch air habitat; and (e) The to nta rive tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at la rye, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby ffMS and certifies that the project has been rev ieM ed and considered •in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Rot of 1970 and, further, this Commission he rebv is coot ~ N",.,. +.,e n,,.. , , -..:., - 1, 2, 3, and 4B above~,P th fsh Commission hereby approves the aDPlica tionrsubject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attar had Standard Co nA itions attached Ae re to and incorporated herein by this reference. Pla nn ine Div is ton (1) "Pr Tor to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, ar participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with the Chaffey unified School Distrt_t Fnr the con;tructloa and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if the school district has previously established such a Community Facilities DTStrict, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the protect site into the territory of such existing district prior to the recordation of the final may or the issuance of building 19i PL' -U. ~. NU. 90-E5 TT 14192 - HIX DEVELR ENT June 27, 1990 Page 3 permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the Cha ffey Unified School District has not formed a Mello-Rdos Lommun ity Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void." f?) Tree Rempvat Permit 89-67 for the removal of 41 trees whose location conflicts with rights-of-way and other site improvements is approved as follows: a) Ail trees located on the site of the Lord House shall be preserved in place; and b) Trees No. fi, 13, P_3, 24, 40, 55, 65 anA 66 shall be preserved by transplanting elsewhere within the projn:t site; and c) Trees No. 18 and 57 shall be removed and replaced with the largest nursery grown stock available, as determined by the Cf ty Planner; and d) Trees Mo. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, and 59 shall be removed and replaced with Eucalyptus maculate (Spotted Gum), minimum 15-gallon Size; and e) The lac at ion of all trees to ore cerv en_tn_., i, •. locations of transplanted trees, and locations ^of replacement trees shall be shown on the detailed Lard sc ape Plans sub,le:t to City Planner review and aDProval prior to the issuance of any permits; and f) The applicant shall follow alt of the arborist's recomae ndat to ns regarding preservation or transplanting measures; and g) Those trees required to 6e preserved in place shall be protected in accordance with Municipal Code Section 19.08,110 (See Condition /3 ), (3) Care shall exercised by all individuals, developers and ::ontractors .erring near preserved tree; so that na damage occurs to such trees. R11 construction shall preserve and protect the health of trees to remain, relocated trees, and new trees planted to replace those removed in accordance with the following meawres: a) All trees to be saved shall be enclosed by an /9~- PL _u .,n A0. 9C b:~ TT 1d192 - HIX DEVEL 'ENT June 27, 1990 Page 4 approDria to construction harrier, such as chain link fence or other means acceptable to the City Planner, . prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit and prior to wmmencement of work. Fences are to remain in place during all phases of construction and may not be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete; and b) No substantial disruption or removal of the structural or absorptive roots of any tree shall be performed; a nd c) No fill material shall be placed within three feet from the outer trunk circumference of any tree; and d) No fill materials shall be placed within the drip lfne of any tree in excess of eighteen inches in depth. This is a guideline and is sub,lect to modification to meet the needs of iM ividual tree species as determined 6y an arborist or landscape architect; and e) No substantial compaction of the soil within the drip line of any tree shall be undertaken; and f) No construction, including structures and wails, that disrupts the root system shalt be permitted. As a guideline, no cutting of roots should occur within a distance equal to three and one-half times the trunk diameter, as mea su rod ai orop,.A lg,.gl n.~t.,. may vary to meet the needs of individual free spe.:fes as determined by an arborist or landscape architect. where some root removal is necessary, the tree crown may require th toning to prevent wf nd damage; and g) The City Planner may impose such additional measures determined necessary to preserve and protect the health of trees to remain, relocated trees, and new trees planted to replace those removed. (4) The lord House end its immediate surroundings are a designated Historical lerdmark. Any alteration, removal, relocation, or reconstruction rcqui res review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission and City Councsl, Plans for the construction of a new garage on the Lord House site shall be submitted for revfew and epproval by the Design Review Committee and Historic Preservation Commlsston prior to the issuance of any permits for the demolition of existing barns or garages or the construction of a new garage. In addition, compliance with ail / /~ TT 16192 - HIX DEVEL' ENT Juno 27, 1990 Page 5 Conditions of Approval for landmark Ai to ra Lion Permit 90-02 is required. !S) the design of all perimeter wails shall De shown on the Landscape Plan subject to City Planner review and approval p riot to the is sua me of building permits. (6) Wa'.15 plated at the rear of the not-a-Dart parcels fronting Hellman Avenue, adjacent to Street "C", shall be Const rut Led of decorative blink subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The walls shall be designed with gated access from Street "L" to the rear of the lots. Engineer ing Division: (1) the existing av erhead utilities (te letomnun is ations and electrical) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shail be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side of 19th Street to the first pole on the south side of Monte Yista Street prior to public improvement aaeptance or occupanvy, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request re imDU rsement agreements to recover one-half the City adopted cost for and erg rou nd ing from future development and/or redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street and offsite on the same side of the street. Also, all existing overhead utilities service lines to houses on both side of Hellnen Avenue shall be placed underground at the same time as the mein lino. (2) An in-lieu fee as Contribution to the future and erg rou nd ing of the existing overhead utilities (te lecommun is atio ns and electrical) on the opposite side of Amethyst Street shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be one-half the Gi ty adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontage. (3) Construct street improvements on the east side of Hellman Avenue from 19th Street south to meet the existing widened portion north of Monte Vista Street. Offsite parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property, with the exception for the two not-a- Dart lots fronting on Hallman Avenue which are surrounded by the Protaa. The DPVelOpnr may req;;est reimbursement agreements to recover Lhe costs of Constructing offsite street improvements from future development as it ocwrs. (41 Construct Master Plan Storm Drain line 2-1 fn Hellman Avenue from its existing function structure near Monte Vista Street to the line which drains the 19th Street at / 7 T PU,~_.ING ( .~ »:ON PrSO LU TI ON N0. 90-85 TT 14 t92 - HI% DEVEL ENT June 27, 1990 Page 6 Heilman Avenue intersection. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the' Developer shall he eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. !5) Construct portions of the City Master Plan Storm Ora in line 2-J in Amethyst Street, Base Line Road, and along the Southern Pacific railroad tracks to meet the City pro Sect at or west of Hellman Avenue, as de CermineA by a fi.^.al drainage report approved by the City Engineer. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facilities and the Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in acco rda nee with City policy. !5) The public street improvements on Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street shalt be construe ted prior to the issuance of building permits. (i) Streets intersectfng Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street shall not have cross gutters, as storm Ara ins are ova ila 6le. (8) If a retaining wall is proposed along Amethyst Street, it shall be located outsfde the street right-of-way. (9) Private drainage easements shall be Shown on the final Map for cross lot drainage facilities. These are expected to occur on Lots 1-7, ~a ~5 ~~ ,~ ,~, q;~ ;i, and oa, per the Conceptual Grading Dla n. (10) Landscaping within the lines-of-sight for intersections with Helliren Avenue and Amethyst Street shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. All total intersections shall have their noticeability Tmproved, usually 6y moving the two closest trees on each side behind the sidewalk. Six foot wide street tree easements shall be provided DM1nd the sfderralk for all corner lots, to the satTsfactian of the City Trafffc Engineer. (il) Reconstruct Mignonette Street as determined by a structural report submitteA to and approved by the Cfty Engineer prior to approval of the Final Map 4r is sua ^::e of build ina norm its, ah ich eVET uCCU rS firSL. (12) Construct local storm dretns in Monte Vista and Layton Streets as determined by the Final Drainage Study. 6. The Secretary to this Comafssian shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. / / J PLANNING COMMISSION P'00 LU TION N0. 90-B5 TT 14192 HI% OEV EL, :Ni June 27, 1990 Page 1 APPROVED AND ADO PTEO THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1990. PLANNING COMy['jSION OF TH F, CITY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA BY ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commis Sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Pla nnfng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LHITIEA, MCNIEL MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER l9~ sctg=- ° = ss_se - _ r tEaso5s"•~e. :ra ;s - _ ~ - ass ~_'..; •' « ., y5w 't= _e Yom. ~~° °,~~o-~ SS :_";01 ~-°•a ~5s~~ =+~f 9S 8Cy~ ;t` ~~~-rl ~l. o"ice°.a:~ g-•~' _-_ g -;o ~°^~e$ sg °as.,,~~yY°s e5"tt,B =°~sz:°;~ s_AY ~g ~~a Ygr „"S„ „a= .P = ^.x9g a tg.:d t=~+o=...'. t= 8{ Efr8a. X55 ...~~SS 3e •`3 :~B~oL ~I,' ~j ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ \~ ~~ a .: g a- _~ t a a ~ a =~ , ~ .i ~ JiJ7 a ~~ Y 'e Ie~; _ _~p E ~_ ~;,, 6°.• 3 e ens ~ i# 3~ { ~ 4 -~ :s ~ i v I ~ e~ ~ J Y s~ I ;~ ~ ~:! ~_3 $ r~ r t~$ a e I ~i ~=n~: 5~J 3a i i~~ ~~ri 2S9Y D~ S ~ a ~r .~a s~ U oa. N 1~ \O n c ti .:c C~ 1--. ~` ~.5i of ax _@.Ae= ,.p. ~~:fippp°°S lays ~»- '~f~g. ° 8 ag5k =SS~l=±$ `Su: jS ~""-~ x g ° V 3~ E1 tla '~ - k°8~ °C~ EYSY sae ~x~a b° ga ~ s 8Y_3 e ___ i~g ~: ~~9 y j. onFa ~ ~ 2 ~ "~ € ~ . b-fit =, Y{tl ° ~ E~, ~ gYE ~ Ef °~ ^~ z_yx y=~S 8 x .^ ~e ° 3~= YgVY f R e3 Y~3y B±- d •B o Y of ?~E •~8 Y ;S~ y~ ~~55 :~~ 5 o~fi° ~Y ~t g ~ ~~ - g ~ Y° 8 s~ X= 3_: safr ~ $lq5 - ~a°s ~~t a~ ~°ea e eV g! a E^b° °~ 83 -a g='~ '~e v r h: °g~ g? .g ! ~ sa ~gES= §g~ ~~i[ ae ~3 C~ Y~~i B~ <Y'~Sj ~:[ N ~ \I N 'Original Pccr 4~~~~~Y E~j. _: 2 ~ 31 .^ ~ ~ z cs ~?i ni ii x i>; ~i xs 3 °' C D '; a :-~ TY ;~- E=s ~ js !S ;? ;fit 3r ~; 21~~ s~S ~~ kY ~ ~ i~ 5_xi ~Y1 5z ,e, o __ w~ ~~ ~ ..~~_~ 'cf :~r~~ - i<z' ~ ~~ ga _~~YaF .-S k~ :L i~~ziLLLL ~e ~m=s`: =s~=~ _ ° 5-r ~~'i~~ ~x'S~ ~ .5°.. ~~~~° E%t~f~ ;~ ~ TyL 3 i~s33 ~~~~_~ 7 s ~E =: 3 r-_ ~~~ ~ ~~f~~r ~?~ .i~ l ~~ - 'S `.a s` a~ ~afr: -'Efr8 ~_t~y c gxe= ° E € ~'"~ ash `x* =8~__ Y'"`° "~a -" -~_ 8a~o C~'" E& ~ ~R ~~.vo=~^CeE xQE B_ ~~ a:x~ ° ~ i E o<:s g~ Yy Aga zr `x~Ms~hxagx a.~x=g xE ?"^=a ~VJ~ ~ ~y. EgE Xx~ywx ~fr ±~ e... _ .: !=: !~ ~"a =i ~`e~~x3sg'y$ #a"g €fi T~aec ~~ I ~ ~~ ^~ ~~ ~~ ~~ xy xgg _i ~~" ~E:~ _u9 ~~h ~~<< •,: ~~'a :~5 =.°5 s~o sib= > 8~ 3~g ~~:Y _yF' YF E~ .~. °E= i=~ „E °~> Y:~E 8h~F ~`~£ ~~E~ ~Y~F au~F - a s a:e3 ~~~ ^~ ~F x# r = X: SE' °Z as $ r 3Ygi 'S .g 8 .~~ .g 5Y ~ S i h ~ ~ ~ i Y ~ F =e gg ,- ~i a z ish~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~5 S F Yj. a=_ e e_ Y=3_ -~~ ~ ~ g x _eg C ~~ S ~ 3 ~ 3~~i ~~ F^; Y ~ Z" Fr ~ ~~ "~"r _ 5 ~Y tt 2 fr~ ~ g ~Yt: ^~ ~ ~I s ~/ . ~ it :.5 l 'ei 'F5 l~x 5: ~gD Y~ ~~ ~E . Y S- Y gg ** ~ _ g-1 :YEfeY ~~ YgtB ~gE~h'~ Est _D_ ~:1tE 9t 5~~~ Y~2'~1 7~ 5 =e ~E~~~3 1;-~ ~~ ~' ~° ~Ej~ ,E ~d~ ~ xy ~e4~ ~~~~~yy ~= x} 1E i8 ~'y~~ ~i'Sei-yyS Ps[ :iii ~i~fasa V~ ~~~ ~~ ~i ~, ~-o 0 ,o f: -~ '~ .., ~~ ~5. ._ Y5 °~ gg ~~ 9 ~___ g ~ i ~ y "_ =o ~T~ =- ~yy`Y SA ff .. S`E9 ~x~ ~~` =gyp ~ ` Y~o »DY'~ i ''3 x3j~ $a< g ~~O ":l ~~ ~ fixx ~»C y " „C `3W=1 5 c~ :s? v~ ~/ "6. .._ _ 3. ~ ,} ~'ggi •" _~{ Ef ~esx ~3ss" ~~aa \I ~I ~~ \I °gs~ F C5~ l F •~ ~ °~ ~ "o g~ ~ 3 ~» ~~ .. - =°~ a ~ "= .(!y E fiv e 5 3 g` 3 ` ` ` EY g; 5- ! ~- B ~~tgY [[ i~9,~x ~_ ppL"!~ ~ S; ,,, _ € S g _ ¢ . ~ € y~ ~~Y~ Fs £x"ix i~eEo E ~ ~Y t;,3 ~I - ~~ v ~I ~I y W ~I - t 8 xe. .*E - Alt .Z+ ^gia ~ ~, ~ xfI xosx & ~ ~'x yg; ~ ~ ~ .x_ F » q:€S :; L :~'a Y~ :. ~ I ~ x ~ ~ g . k care z i die am ts~ a V ~sx^ ~ ~ ~ ~~: ~Sj` ~~~id e = ~~~ aj~~ s _~_:_ x ~ 33 ' ~~~- 3 fF 3~ 7 ~ ~ a d ~~~} - j~9^~ ~~ ~ Es~ t ::4Tt _ ;; ~ ; its ~~~~ B 3» ~~ E L_?' ~~ x J1 - +._ ` -~_ ;~.e IIi f.•_CY =jYi 8p Y`~T 3 3_ -sx ~° A?a ~ar_ ~ -S = Y ~ - ;ter -! ~~,y;; 3~rsa3 -Aa die z- ~~~~ of ~rlE ~~~~~ ~~ t~s~ 3~'Yiq Fari f~s i+p~ i ! :-~ -e: idi~~ Fr~ ~xFs i _. \I I I \I \I ~ I ~I ~I aob a : a~: ~ ~ c ~~ ~ ;_ &eo y ~y a ~ t( Y ~ V ~ Yp ~ ~ [a _ a~~ i 8 i'. »9 x j~ ~ d$a i r ~ La Eo ;fit _,= t^Y ~te i"~~ ~F E5 x x •~ .. w ~ .,i= ` x Ci a ° ,~s ~ ~ : ~ ~i~g ~ : !I\I y u C ~_ 3 lL' iT C C F t f ti P ~fr .,e_ - _ I - € Jtk S „fr ~ E aY t E E E ~° dsa:r NE a w v zpe B~= ~ t ~ cas ~=gfrea5 E st a °x o,; •.. -a• s _ " el g ~;~~ ~' I I Y- ~5 ~~ :saga Fg ~ - r ~ \I \I ~I ~~ .I ~ I v . ~ a{ `F - t 3 w Y., E~-" k 2 i"iL 3E 3Saa ze ~ aY~ ~ €a„'~ x, e ~ Y~33 +s FS a:g5e ~~ 'g~ i =~$a g; € ~ 3?=f aSas '°aa,a is -. ~~ aiE~ ~~ 3~~°~ ~~ 3 e x= -e tie of xa '~ ay a~;= a~ S:EaP ~i t ~ ~ ! z3a~ ~iase a_ "a rY s~~ 3g ~_a3- ~= r ~ s+3~~ x~Yt aa: xs xa 3s ~r_ ~3 d t:~ s$ E ass t~ s "~str :a $3 ~~ pts~ Ss Y~,;st aZ ?~ ~ isr~$ -a3~ ~;.~: afi ~• ce ~sre 3~ =~Fj~ 'r x'a~`- 1sa~ ;'sue a$ it a= a~3i ~a ~ ~ s :; i3 ~ 3asF= sy=~~ i=ai~ FP~ r" ~,~ rgr3 =3 +sai a; is ~ c•s:~ i~a ?~~=F? s W~~ ~e s3i: :3 a~~~° ~k~ 3~ ~tjas ~:3s AtPi?~ -~ " ~~ `~ ~~ ~ a~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ti ~a/ _.. wsa s 6 - 585 _ oxX C ° ~585~ ~ ~ o ~ i 8= a _ _ mob - 9 _ _ - q ~~ a~x -fir "a"^~ ~ - a - '_ g - =~ C=$ x s ~a`.s" x g: F I s3 ~ co o° " $° E ks ~~ `x„05 ' E I -_ °~ _ !x sad a €~ €°EZ= x == x~ _- - $`° s ` - ~` ~ ~` ~' ~a2 gE E ~sEe ao5s_ ~o s_.. .~ o_ W... CCU 4~ ~a ~. Y ~b ~5 E~~g ~E to° \~ i al ~I ~I ~I I \ V I c \I NI ml ^I ~~ ~, x .~ ~5 €~ =~ €e <a~ \~ E x. =.~ ~y ~~ Wf ^I ;~ E EY ~: 7 ~o bz Fy "g6 Y s„ dx S :r~ _.~ 'b_ t_ Y Y ; Te E ~'~ ~~ ~ C.:_ Y= f P~~ ;5 P E35 SE 6 5`~ ~~ EI 82~ _~• f ~Iy ~I ~I 93 T.~ _S ~ i~~ a*ae ~~3; ~~ ` Pt "s ~~ k gr~s 93 as a , s n!! e i „Ex , s ? kSS e E.B S 'fie A ;~ S fY C Z ~5~~ ~~~ ~AL37~C' yL kCC :~€. ~ _ ~ s F `' [ ~~~ 3 .~ ~ ss~ t'~ 5 ~ a L w ti~ .~F ~ y ~I ~~ ~ ~~a d4 7 N -v 0 0 .v ~. `~ "'~ 69 x~ sk EC .; ~_~ S; S .°!f ~I g~ g~tl no ~S ~x =,Sg !=_ ~x~ :7 €es \~ - P~Y~ g ~~Qo ai ;~~~ :" 7~~a Sa :,, E ~- k R ~~"Y „ ~_~. i~ xs.~ x~ LaES 2g _'~~ SE €a~ & :- e~ Fg~° ~~ ~:~'v~ nix r Sa ~ E~? 3 say 8°~ - 9~- = g-sk e ..2~F t ~~~~ 3 ~`°: __ e°8' ~7 g9 E iSY~ 3~ iffy e -gl~ ae x_ ~ +I ~I ~I Tt !! J.E 4 = e - ~ .4. - ! YYW ~~~ ~ x Y~ i ~ Ys ~ ! ; t _ _ •_ ~~5 Ya 9 :_ G __ T „-S [~ ~ 3~ is .. Y i ec - _. s~ t~ Y t: i ~ 3~ _ t/ $ ~ j ~S ~l ~: ~ ~}' i j~ jj 11 ~'iY _x Y= $ e" ~ x ~I ~ ~ o I ~I °.3 Y~ _° ~e~ ~ gsS ~-~ ~3 ;~: ~ ~j ~~L Y~ _Y` ~~~ ~s Z• ~ Y .i8 ~~~ iD~ ~i "~ ~ - ~~ ~ :8 a ~O~ 'S- E « i i Yi S ~~ as: it $3~s Lea °}~ D ~-~ x~ ~xr k ~ -' i~~x ion ~3i ~I a ~I ~n3 L y °L~ C .-i tii G A~ K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 - HI% DEVELOPMENT - .A residential subdivision of 65 single family tots on 19.1 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling unies par acre) located south of 19th Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues - APN: 202-061-12, 14, 40, and 48. iom Gra hn, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Melch er asked if staff had reviewed a design of the subdivision with cul-de-sacs bulbs within the new tract. Ba rrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the concept was considered for Kirkwood and I.ay ton, but they would have been in ezc ess of 600 feet with the addition of the bulbs, which would violate City code and there wau ld be a substantial portion of property in the middle between the two streets that he was not sure cou id be accessed. LOmmi55 ion er Melc her stated he did not see Che relationship of the design of the tract around the Lord House. Mr. Grahn responded that the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission did not specify a specific parcel size area. He said the original proposal included a street immediately to the east of the house, with the distance between the street and the House not meeting mini mum setback requirements. He said the current proposed tract design was determined adequate. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Ernest Hix, President, Hix Development, 437 South Cataract Avenue Suite 2, Rancho Cucamon a, San Dimas, stated that durinn fw< m••ter -'---'- 6use cne 9 .~ "v P Y - ,lire dirrerent configurations and the Historical Preservation Commission finally approved the current plan. He presented a letter detailing their concerns with the proposed Resolution. He stated they had submitted grading plans for bulbed streets with drainage running directly to Amethyst without the need to drain through an existing residential area and wf thout the need to install storm drains in Layton Street and Monte Vista Street. He said they were opposed to lowering the lots on the south side as Shown on Exhibit D, as it would only lower nine tots from .4 to 2.3 feet, which he felt was negligible. He stated that their traffic study ind fca tea there would be a 11 percent increase in daily traffic for Layton and a 128 percent fnc rea se for Kirkwood if the streets were connected through. He said the traffic study showed there would be negligible impact upon the traffic in their developments whether or not the streets were connected., He stated they did not wish to connect the streets. Mr. Nix objected to the requirement to complete tho Master Plan storm drain and sa sd that th ei~ stud :es indicated ih eir tract would o~,ly add iS .S cubic feet of water per second, which would translate into .03 inch of water added to Amethyst. Me presented a chart depicting a total cost of over E3 million to complete ail the improvements requested by the City. Ne requested that transltton lanes be allowed rather than widening the street beyond their project boundaries. Ne objected to the reconstruction of Planning Commission Minutes -12- June 27, 1990 ~~ / Mignonette Street. He felt Lhat the City could not legally require them to underground the utilities north and south of their property. He objected to the requirement that all street work on Heilman and Amethyst be complete prior to the issuance of building permits and said they wish to be abie to build model homes at the same time they arc doing the street work. He said the street work would he done prior to the showing of the models. He said no one had explained why the additional requirements were needed and if it is legal to require them. Martha Bellinger, 6927 Layton Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that on August 2i, 1989, she sent a Letter on behalf of the neighbors voicing Concerns about the development and the proposal to align Layton Street xi th yic taria Street. She said that the re5 id ents were concerned about the safety of their children and the increased traffic. She said that Hix Development met with the residents and was now proposing to bulb Layton Street. She said the residents of the 6900 block were in favor of bulbing the street because they have 25 children on the street. She said that many residents bought into the street because the street was a dead-end street and the residents felt that was safer for their children. Chairman McNiel felt that people purchasing the property should have realized that a dead-end street with a barricade would eventually be built through. He thought that police and fire access should carry a higher level of concern than children not being abie to play in the street. He said that if the street had ended in a cul-de-sac, Lhen the residents Could probably safely assume the street would not be continued. Ms. Sell finger stated that the ret id ents felt that trucks have adequate access as the street has been open for 12 years and their have been no accidents with garbage trucks, etc. She was concerned about a possible increase in crime with an open street, She said they felt that the property owner who owned the property at the end of the street wnu to ~~* ~..±± S•,~ ;; ;,; Liiere was no aovanzage to Hix Development to open the street, but rather bulbing the street would give Hiz Development additional buildable area. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Mt Niel closed the public hearing. He suggested that the Commission first deal with the question of lowering E Street and the lots on the south portion of the tract. Mr. Hanson stated that several years ago on a tract to the west the residents to the south were very concerned with the elevations of the new homes. He understood the direction from the Commission at that time to be that the City should make every attempt to minimize the height dffferential. Chairman McNiel asked if it would provide for proper drainage at the reduced height. Mr, Hanson stated that it would, He said that Mr. Hix has indicated he can provide an alternative street design that would drain the water to the south and save 2-I/2 feet of grade. He suggested the Comelsston decide if the t-1/2 feet was significant. He said that on the other project the Tentative Mep was Planning Commission Minutes -13- June 21, 1990 ~~ approved and the issue was raised again on the Design phase as well as at the rough grading point. Chairman Mt Niel asked the grade differential between the existing homes and the project. Mr. Hanson stated the houses vary in height. Chairman Mc Niel reopened the Dublin hearing to allow the applicant to comment. Mr. Hix provided across section to show the differences in height. Ms. Miller stated the applicant proposed to match the ex isttng grade at the rear property line, which is higher than existing houses. She said the alternate plan would make it possible to lower the houses below the existing grade as much as 2.3 feet. Chairman McN iel closed the public hearing. He stated that because the tract to the south previously used a lot of grading to dig into the ground, it created a negative impact upon the tract being considered tonight. He felt it may not make sense to force this developer to continue to grade. Commmissioner Chitiea recalled extensive hearings wf th a lot of testimony regarding the issue when the prev iou5 tract was approved. She was hesitant to merely approve the new tract without taking into account the homeowners to the south. However, she indicated 2.3 feet did not seem [o be a significant difference. Commissioner Melchor stated he was in favor of through streets, especially given the length of the dead end streets. He felt the dead end streets may delay emergency vehicles in reaching another location if thev shnntA ro.~.~. take one of the <trnn.e ny :,,~,,, ~;,t „~u Then nave to back up. Commissioner Chitiea shared Commissioner Melcher's concerns regarding the streets going through. She felt it would make sense for the new development for the streets to continue through, but she did not feel it was essential. Chairman Mc Niel felt that Mignonette needs to go through, but he did not fuel that it was quite so critical that Kirkwood and Layton do so. He said he had seen other streets with more confusing atc ens than those streets. The Lommiss Toners reviewed the plans. Commissioner Chitiea felt that the amount of traffic generated 6y cutting through would not be that significant. She felt it would not entourage people from outside Che neighborhood to use the strne*_s as shortcuts. Ms. Miller showed graphics from the traffic study. She indicated the study indicates there would be more trips at the bulb end of the street, but fewer trips at the open end of Layton and Mignonette. She said the numbers were not substantially different in either case. Planning Commission Minutes -14- June 21, 1990 ~a~ IL was the consensus of the Planning Commission that Mignonette should he open. Commissioner Melcher felt that Kirkwocd and Layton should also go through. Commissioner Chitiea stated she sympathized with the residents, but agreed from a planning and 5a fety standpoint She felt it made more sense to go through. Chairman Mc Niel agreed. He said the City has tried to provide access throughout the community. He stated that from a safety and circulation standpoint, he felt the streets should go th rough. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the applicant had raised a question regarding the building of the models concurrently with working on the street improvements. Mr. Nanson stated that the City Council had rec ent iy passed a Resolution requiring that street improvements be completed prior to issuance of building permits on collector streets to avoid subjecting the neighbors to construction traffic prior to street improvements being fn place. Commissioner Chitiea stated that requirement was necessary for the protection of residents. Russ Maguire. City Engineer, stated that grading permits could 6e issued prior to the street improvements. Commissioner Melc her asked if there was any leeway in the Resolution because he could understand the desire to have the models ready when the street improvements are in. Mr. Maguire responded that staff and the Commissions shall consider the Resolution. He said that it is a Resolution rather than an ordinance, so the Commission would have leeway if they felt there are unique circumstances. Commissioner Melcher agreed to follow the City Council direction. Commissioner Chitiea felt 1t makes good sense to protect existing residents. Chairman NcNtel asked if the developer would be eligible for reimbursement of the off-site storm drain improvements. Mr. Hanson stated he would be eligible for reimbursement from the City. He said that some of the drains are scheduled to be installed by the City if the budget holds. He said if the drains have not yet been irs*_alle"., the dev eloper woulA be required to install them. He stated that the CT ty has not had a chance to fully review the study submitted by the developer regarding the depth of flow added to Methyst. He said that any additional drainage must be cans idered and the drainage problem should be solved. Planning Commission Minutes -15- June 27, :990 ~7 Chairman Mc Niel stated that infrastructure must go in. He said reimbursement agreements would provide partial reimbursements. Chairman Mc Niel reopened the public hearing to allow Mr. Hix to Comment. Mr. Hix stated that if the streets go through at Layton and Kirkwood as shown on the plans and E Street were to be lowered, the water would have to run down Layton Street. He stated they had prepared cross-sections going from the homes on Mignonette through their north and south lots. He felt the grading differential was insignificant and they should not be required to funnel the water to Layton and to require the construttion of storm drains on Layton. Mr. Hix stated they had studied the whole tract to the south and it car. not take any additional water. Chairman Mc Niel asked if it is possible to drain from east to west. Mr. Hanson stated that the only way to lower the street would be 40 lower it at Layton and drain to Layton. Mr. Hix stated that presently the water goes along E Street to Amethyst. He stated that the lots are 75 feet deep and the difference of a few feet would be insignificant. Mr. Maguire stated that if there is no need to lower the lots, the water could go along Amethyst whether Layton is connected or not. Commissioner Melcher stated that if the developer must complete perimeter streets before beginning construction, to then obligate a grading scheme to go into the existing tract to install drainage would be counterproductive. He preferred that the E Street water be conducted out to Amethyst. Mr. Hiv ito.a~e.: ,.:_ ..u... ~, ___ r ~" ~ c duJ iLimiai aireei wo r[ regU lred to the north and south of-thei rV projec t~ boundary and the reconstruction of Mignonette. Chairman Mctiiel again closed the public hearing. Mr. Hanson <_a id the developer has been requested to hire a soils firm to test the pavement to see if Mignonette needs additional work. He said there may not be a nee! to do any work. Ms. Miller s~:a ted that most of the concern arose because surface drainage from the tract would De routed down Mignonette. Chairman NcNiel questioned the add7tionai street work extending beyond the 6ou ndaries of the project. Hr. Hanson stated that the developer is being asked to remove two bulges on the street because it is a narrow street. He said this is consistent with previous requirements of other developers. Planning Commi:;sion Minutes -16- June 27, 1990 a~g Commissioner Chitiea felt that the conditions were fair and consistent. She agreed that allowing the water to flow to Amethyst would 6e acceptable. Commissioner Melch er concurred. Mr. Hanson stated that he felt the applicant`s objection to the and erg round ing was to extending the and ergrou nd ing to correspond to the street improvements. He said he was concerned that the poles near the curb on the off-site improvements would have to be relocated and it would 6e cost effective to complete the and ergrou nd ing for the two out-parcels at this t?me. Ne said the developer would be eligible fora reimbursement agreement from future development of those properties. Co^mis; inner Ch itrea stated that also was consistent with what has been done in the past. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing to allow Mr. Hix to comment. Nr. Hix stated that one of the requirements was that the utilities be and erground ed on the opposite side of Hillman into the houses. Chairman Mc Niel again closed the public hearing. M^. Hanson stated that the developer was not being asked to rewire the houses. He said if need be, the developer could put up poles on the opposite s~,de of the street, but the poies would then be on the same side of the street as the existing houses. Co;nmissioner Me lcher felt that if the developer completes the utility work in the right-of-way. it should not be a requirement to revise the electrical sear is es to the individual homes, but he did feel poles should be on the same side of the street as the houses thry would be Serving. ~omntsstoner Chitiea agreed. Motion: Moved by Mc Ni el, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 14192 for 65 lots. Moti m carried by the following vote: AYES, COMMISSIONERS: CHI TI EA, NCNJEL, MELLHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSEN": COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER -carried . ~ w . 10:05 - Planning Commissioe Recessed 10:14 -Planning Commission Reconvened Planning Commission Minutes -17- June 27, 1990 ~v t RESOLUTION N0. q(~- ~cJ 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST TO DELETE FOUR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 65 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 19.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 19TH STREET BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND AMETHYST STREET IH THE LON RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) Hix Development has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract 14192, as described in the title of this Resolution, hereinafter referred to as "the Tentative Tract". (11) On June 27, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subJect matter of the Tenative Tract and, following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted their Resolution Ho. 90- 85 (attached as Exhibit "1") thereby condltlanally approving the Tentative Tract. (111) The Plannlnc Coimnisslan's action was timely appealed to this Council on July 6, 1990, with a 30 day extension to the appeal period requested on July 13, 1990. (iv) On September 5, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho r„r,,,u,nna c~!nducted a duly notice Dublic hearln~ on the sub,)ect matUar of the appeal and, on Baia Date, conc!uue~i Liw public haaring. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOYI, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Counci hereby l,peclflcally finds that alt the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. ~/t) RESOLUTION N0. TT 14192 - HIX DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 2 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that Lhe project has been reviewed and considered to compliance with the California Environmental puality Act of 1970 and concurs with the tssuance of the Negative Declaration issued on June 27, 1990. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to th15 Councll during the above referenced hearing on September 5, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The Tenatlve Tract applies to property located south of 19th Street between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue within the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre); (b) The property to the north contains single family homes, to the east are single family homes and vacant property, to the south is vacant property and single family homes, and to the west are single family homes; (c) The Tentative Tract is for the development of a 65-lot subdivision on 19.7 acres of land; (d) The requirements of Planning Cammiss~lon Resolution No. 90-85 remain to be important and necessary to the subdivision of the property; and (e) The Tentative Tract as spettfled is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General P7 an and Development Cade of the City of Aencho Cucamonga; and would not promote a detrTmentai condition to the persons or properties 1n the lemw!dtate vicinity. a. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Councll hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That deletion of the conditions for construction of street improvements and undergrounding of existing overhead ut111ttes offsite along Hellman Avenue, reconstruction of Mignonette! Avenue, and construction of andtions of the Amethyst stores drain would not be consistent with City policy; (b) Thet deletion of the conditions for construction of street improvements and undergrounding of exlstiny overhead ut111t1es offsite along Hellman Avenue, reconstruction of Mignonette Avenue, and eonstruction of portions of the Amethyst stores drain wou1R net be consistent with tho objectives of the General P1 an and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; ar~d a~i RESOLUTION N0. TT 14192 - HIX DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 3 In1 TL- ,a ~ •,.t "~ wnuiiions for construction or street improvements and undergrounding of existing overhead utilities offslte along Hellman Avenue, reconstruction of Mignonette Avenue, and construction of portions of the Amethyst storm drain are not unreasonable. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal, thereby letting stand the Conditions set forth 1n Planning Ca~tsston Resolution No. 90-85. 6. The Council hereby provides notice to Nix Development that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by the Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of CTvi1 Procedure Section 1094.6. to: (a) certtfyito the adaptton~of ithls Resolutton,~ end (b) forthwith transmfit a certified copy of this Resolution, by Certified Matl, Return Receipt Requested, to Htx Development at their address as per City records. ~.I{-- ~1~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ' ~ 1 GATE: September 5, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: brad Buller. City Planner BY: Jerry Guarracino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF TIME EXTENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEM 88-03 - A.E. SMITH - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to add the standard school mitigation rood it ion to the development of 20 apartment units on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre), located at the end of Sierra Madre Avenue, west of Edwin Street - APN: 201-251-22. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~mends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision to approve the Time Extension for Des+,gn Review A8-03, subject to the standard school mitigation condition, in accordance with Urgency Ordinance No. 395. RACxG nnuwn• nee+.. P„ og B3 °" - Ji iy in"iiy oPPPV VCd UO NUgUSL l/, 1988, subject to ^the~,cond itions~~set forth in Planning Commfss ion Resolution No. 88-117 is ttached). On August 8, 1990, the Planning Commission granted the applicant, A.E. Smith, a one-year Lime er.tension which will expire on August 17, 1991. The standard school mitigation condition required as a result of Urgency Ordinance No. 395 was added to the previous conditions of approval at that time; it is Lhe addition of this condition that is now being appealed. ANALYSIS; Urgency Ordinance No. 395 was adopted on June 1, 1969, approximately 30 months after the approval of Design Review 88-03. The City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 395 to ensure that adequate school fac ll it te5 will be available to serve Dropo sed residential developments. In working with the local school districts, a policy has been developed consistent with the intent of Ordinance No. 395. In the event d aChnni dic hni_t . +~..~ «+ p.ov,..=, t:r~.~en isyui to the City that insufficient capacity is available to serve the protect, the following Condition of Approval is imposed as a mitigation: "Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall consent to, or particfpate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the protect site to provide in contunction with the applicable ~ /3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR DR 88-03 - A.E. SMITH CO. September 5, 1990 Page 2 School District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, fn the alternative, consent to the annexation of the pro,lect site into the territory of such existing District prior to the issuance of building permits. Further, if the affected School District has ret fe rmed a Mello-Rhos Community Facilities District within 12 months of the date of approval of the time extension and prior to the issuance of building permits for said pro,~ec t, this tend ition shall be deemed null and void." Discussion with the Chaffey Joint Union High School District indicates that they are beyond capacity and are in the process of forming a Mello- Roos District for this area. Resp 11y su ted, d r Cit ann BB:JG/,ifs Attachments: Exhihif ^a^ _ r""".....~ "--_-+ •rr~ Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-106 Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution of Denial ~/~ August 7, 1990 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: 20 Apartment Units Sierra Madre Avenue - Rancho Cucamonga DR kk88-03 APN /k207-251-22 Dear This letter comes to you with a request for your auppozt of our project's time extension. This project was approved by you in August 1988. At that time, we were granted approval of 20 apartment unite at the end of ciAY.A MAIIYP. Avenue in an area very much on the decline. Our project, south of 9th Street just east of ~ruva i.vo:..,c, - - conditioned upon obtaining approval for many standard planning, building, and engineering items. It is, however, one very extreme condition Chat has created a great hardship. At the time of our original approval, we ware conditioned to pay and obtain dedications on three parcels to the north of our project for street improvements, We were also conditioned to Fully improve the cul-de-sac including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk asphalt/base, street Lights, Landacnping/irrigation, sewer ana storm drains. We were also required to complete an existing street to the east, making that cul-de-sac complete as well. These unusually expansive conditions were placed on this, a very emr~ii project, requiring us to bear the improvement costa of $122,000.00, ae well ae several thousand doiiara For the actual land acquisition. After two years, we era still continuing negotiations on one remaining street dedication fartheaC to the north. ~-/~ Page Two In closing, we ask that you support this extena ion of time but retain the original conditions of approval. We are very concerned that the new additional condition referring to ordinance number 395 adding another $48,000.00 to a development inundated with unexpected higher coats due to several conditions of approval, create a negative Financial position for a previously-negotiated Loan and investor gackage in place. Thank you for your time and consideration. We look forward to your help and support as we strive towards approval and completion. Yours very truly, ~--YGG~"MITH COMPANY " V- A. E. Smith ~/6 I. TIME EXTENSION FOR OESI GN REY IEM 88-03 - A. E. SMITH -The development of 20 apartment units on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium Hf gh Residential District (14-24 dwell~i n9 units per acre), located at the end of Sierra Madre Avenue, west of Edwin Street - APN: 201-251 -22. Jerry Gua rrac ino, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report aM a letter from the apPl ica nt protesting the addition of the school condition. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Alan Smith, A. E. Smith, 8632 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that delays bare Geea encountered in acquiring the ded is atton5 on Lhe three parcels Lo the north of their project for street improvements, as they were conditioned to do by their original protect approval. He said the investor package and financing was locked in and it would be a great hardship to add on the additional (40,000+ required to satisfy the school condition. He said there is not much growth in the area. :ie ar ing no further to stimony, Lh airman McNf el closed the public hearing. Ne stated the school condition was added on as a result of a City ordinance and the Commission had no authority to ignore the ordinance. He said the Commission had the choice of denying the time extension or granting the time extension with the inclusion of the condition, which the applicant could then appeal to Cf ty Council. Motion: Moved by Neinber9er, seconded by Melc he r, to adopt the Resolution approving Time Extension for Design Review 98-03. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMM ISS [ONERS: NCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, MEI NBERGER nuts: COMMISSIVNERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LHITIEA -carried i ~ f ~ Motion: Moved by MtNiel, seconded Dy Melche r, una nisqusly carried, to extend the meeting beyond 11:00 P.M. e • • r DIRECTOR'S REPORTS J. GRADE SEPARATION AT FOOTHILL BOULEYARD~AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD Mike Oliver, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. He stated that staff felt the steel structure to be sore attractive than the concrete structure. Planning Lossslsston Minutes -17- a~~ ExNiair " a"- pIRNNI NU August 8, 1990 COMM\SSION ~`NNIAT~S RESOLUTION N0. 90-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION ANO MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DESIGN REV [EN N0. 88-03, THE OEV ELOPMENT OF 20 APARTMENT UNITS ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM H[GH RESIDENTIAL DISTR IC7 (14-24 DNELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE ENO OF SIERRA MAORE AVENUE, NEST OF EOHIN STREET, AND MAXING FIN OINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-251-22. A. Recitals (i) A.E. Smith has filed an aPDlicatton for the extension of Design Review No. 88-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Ez tension request is referred to as "the application." (i i) On June 22, 1988. this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88-111, thereby approving, subject to sped fit conditions and time limits, Oe si gn Review No. 88-03. (iii) On August 17, 1988, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 88-05, thereby aDProvfng, subject to all specific conditions and time limits set forth in Planning Commissfon Resolution No. 88-117, Design Review 88-03. (iv) On June 28, 1990, the applicant filed a request for a 12-month time extension. ;:; ~~ ..a dCL ~~ nuyuai, iiw. the rianm ng LonmmisslOn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed publfc hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (vi) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, 1t is hereby found, deterwtned, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. lased upon substantial evidence Dresented to this Comm155fon, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: ~J(NIAIT "C" -PLgNNINGm CvµH1551~N RESc~L1.lT1UN No. do-I[Xo ~-/8- PLANNING COMMISSION RF~OLUTION N0. 90-106 OR BB-03 - A.E. SMITH AUGUST 8, 1990 Page 2 (a) The previously approved Design Review is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, 6pecific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and (b) The extension of the Design Review will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes. and Policies; and (c) The extension of the Design Review is not if kely to cause public health and safety problems; and (d) The extension is within the time limits prescribed by state law and focal ordinance. (e) The previously approved Desf gn Review is not consistent with Urgency Ordinance No. 395 pertaining to the evaluation of adequate school facilities far the proposed residential development. 3. Based upon the findf ngs and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application sub3ect to each and every condition set forth below and In the planning Commission Resolution No. 88-117. ,.. •„ -.~~.,... nl v,i ~n Mai nnA in Planning Conissfon ~ Resolution No. Dg-117, shall apply except where nadified herein. (b) Approral shall expire on August 17, 1991, if bu it df ng permits have not been issued, unless extended by the Planning Commission. (c) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the appltunt shall conaent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Meilo-Roos Community Fac111ttes District pertaining to the project site to provide, in conjunction wlih the aDDllcable School 'District, for the eonstruetton and maintenance of necessary sciaoi faciiities. ebwaver, iF any School District has previausly established such e Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, to the alternative, consent to the annexation of the Dro,)ect site into the territory of sucA existing D1sVict prior to the tsswnee of butldfng permits. a~9 PLANNING COMMISSION R'-OLUTION N0. 90-106 DR 88-03 - A.E. SM ITF AUGUST 8, 1990 Page 3 Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Melto-Roos Community facilities District within 12 months of the date of approval of the time extension and prior to the recordation of the Final Map or issuance of building permits for said prof ect, this condition shall 6e deemed null and void. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AHD ADOPTED THIS.BTH DAY OF AUGUST, 1990. PLANNING COMMJSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY r- I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho !'~-},°~n~0, ~~ !;C r:.'.j C-': j ayv liry" ne iV 1YVIV 11 waa duly and regularly introduced, passed, and~adopted`oy the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August, 1990, Dy the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL. MELCNER, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA ~-ad CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 8, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Jerry Gua rracino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR AND DESIGN REVI EN 88-03 - A E SMITH - The development of 20 apartment units on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) located at the end of Sierra Madre Avenue, west of Edwin Street - APN: 207-251-22. BACKGROUND: Design Review 88-03 was originally approved on August 17, 1988, subject to all of the conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-117 (attached). Design F,eview 88-03 is due to expire on August 17, 1990. The Development Code Section 11.02.1008, states that extensions may (upon making certain findings) be granted in 12-month increments, nat to exceed a total of 4 years from the original date of approval. The applicant is currently requesting a one-year time extension which would expire on August 17, 1991. Required Find inns: Section 17.02.1008, states that the Planning Commission may extend the approval of a project if the following findings can be made: i. That there has been no significant changes in the land use element, Development Code, or character of the area within which the project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming. 2. That the granting of an extension should not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ii, dNALY`;iC• ~taif nab ..+~... + tha prop com aced the +~ ~~"~ os ed time extension and p Droposal with current physical development criteria outlined in the Development Code. Based on this review, the approved project meets the development standards of the Medium High Residential District. F~F11R1T " D" - ~IANNINI+, COMMl55f oN S7RFF REr~iRT ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION 'TAPE REPORT DR 88-03 - A.E. SM1 . AUGUST 8, 1990 Page 2 However, the project is inconsistent with Urgency Ordinance No. 395 pertaining to the evaluation of adequate school facilities far proposed residential development. Said ordinance was adooted on June 7, 1989, approx ima Lely 10 months after the approval of Cesign Review 68-03. The City Council Lh rough the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. 395 has expressed concern with the maintenance of orderly and balanced development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Accordingly, to protect the integrity of the development process; to assure continued development stability; and to protect the public health, safety and welfare, the City Council adopted said ordinance which requires the imposition of the following condition of approval to ensure that adequate school facilities will be available to serve proposed residential developments: "Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shalt consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with the applicable School District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicani shall, in the alternative, consent ±o the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the issuance of building permits. further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within 12 months of the date of approval of the time extension and prior to the issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall 6e deemed null and void." the applicant has indicated to staff his opposition to the addition of the above-mentioned condition, due to economic considerations. III. FACTS FOR FINDIN 6S: The following findings are provided for the Commissl~~onsideration: The provision of adequata school facilities is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. 2. The proposed time extension, with the addition of the school impact mitigation condition required by Ordinance No. 395, is consistent with Lhe Municipal Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Inland a 11T1 e Dai'~Bullettn newspaper as a public hearing an notices sent to al property owners within 300 feet of the project site. aaa PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88-03 - A,E. SM1 AUGUST 8, 1990 Page 3 RECOMMENDP.TION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year time extension for Design Review 88-03 through the adoption of the attached Resolution, which includes the additional condition as required by Urgency Ordinance 395. Resp ly submitted Bra u r City P anner BB:JG:mig Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "8" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Resolution No. 88-117 Resolution of Approval ~a3 June 27, 1990 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Planning Department RE; Expiration of Environmental Assessment and Development Review 88-03 (Appealed) To Whom It May Concern: This letter is a request far an extension o£ tfie above referenced project. Due to extensive civil engineering and plan checking processing. Please feei free to call if you have any questions or, require additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, A E SMITH CORPORATION ~ ~~ Alan E, Smith cc: Sun-Ray Enterprises ~~ N ~a ~/ .~-_ ,~ i c ~ ~' '~. o(L NMtt [ r 4 VINM[R IV[MY( _ t;:y ~-_---+ I ~ I~-, I- EL OORLGO <VE I r I J fl(RRI N41R[ [V[NU( {' _~ _ ~- ! ~- I_ u .. _ I GLENN 1V[ ~ ~ ~ FO~INr fTR[FT O t.iCLrir~ f r ; ~ ~ ^~~~ p WNbLUi IV[ I ll Lf rN / ~ 1 ~~ ~C ~ ~~l 1i3~ n ~[ ~~~o i II [ ~ ~ r ,~ : it ,_..., ~ r ~i ~ i ,~ ~, i ~~' 1 pp~T' .awo c i ~ ' ~~~ - ~di~ 1111$ n ' ~` ~' ~ ~~~~~~R..' iii i •' ' ~ ~ ; _ i 4j<f 4 \Tr'- . 1 .. ~ k `- ~~; l "~?E !, 'I--~' = j~ -~~~ i .~ ... \ I a .. ~xN~L'~~T .. ~ " ~ I ~a~ ~ ',I II { ~ ~ tartar u11m + _ O n I • N~MNO CYC~MM6 C~ RESOLUTION N0. 88-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING GOMM ISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 88-03, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 20 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED Ai THE TERMINUSES OF S[ERRA MADRE AVENUE AND MAIN STREET - APN: 207-251-22 A. Recitals. (i) Alan Smith has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 88-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resoi ution, the subject Development Review request i; referred to as "the application". (fi) On khe 22nd of June, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the appiication and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: -i,;;u~i 6~,~by >peciPicaiiy n nos tnaL aii of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based uDOn substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Matn Street and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north, east, and west is designated for residential uses. The property to the north end east is developed with single family residences. The property to the west is developed with a condominium project. The property to the south is designated and developed with railroad tracks operated py A.T. d S.F.; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) The development of 20 apartments on 1.08 acres of land is consistent with the Medium-Nigh Residential land use designation of the Development Code and the General Plan. ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSI RESOLUTION N0. DEVELOPMENT REV tEw 88-03 - ALRN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conci udes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the object+ves of the General plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and {c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the publ lc health, safety, or velfare, or materially injurious to properties ar improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental puality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative ue~ia, aii un. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Otvision (1) A spa/Jacuzzi shall be provided. The location, size, and design shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 121 The rggf "eyebrQw4" 4n the rear elevation of the garage shall be enlarged to be more in scale with the building or shall be eliminated. The plans shalt be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the Issuance of building permits. (3) The fallowing items shall be incorporated into the final landscape plans which are subject to review and approval by the City Planner prfor to the Issuance of building permits: ~t~ Q PLANNING COMMigSIL 1ESOLOTION N0. DEYELOPMEN7 REVIEW 88-03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 3 (a) Accent treatment shall be provided at the entry off Sierra Madre Avenue. (b) Extensive landscaping shall be provided along *.he site boundaries, particulariy the north and east boundaries. (c) A sample of the texturi zed pavement mater?al shall be submitted. (d) A decorative block wall shall be provided along the south property lines. R wrought iron fence with decorative block pilasters or a decorative block wall shall be required along the north property line. In addition, the exfsting walls on the east and west shall be upgraded to provide a decorative treatment, such as stucco with a decorative tap. (e) The limits of any easements and their restrictions on landscaping shall be clearly delineated on the plans. (a) A final acoustical analysis shall be provided to ,AA. ..•--a+-. ;x O~L> irum Lae X.I. a ].t. r.......,.. ~ y Railroad and any necessary mitigation for exterior and interior noise levels. The analysts shall 6e reviewed and accepted Dy the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Engineering Division (i) The developer shall obtain the necessary right-of- way and construct full width improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site northerly to the existing dedicated portion of Sierra Madre Avenue prior to issuance of building permits. Sidewalks shall be constructed along the west side and shall cover the entire parkway from the block wall to the curb. the deveioper is eligible for reimbursement for the cost of construttton of the off-site improvements upon development or redevelopment of the adjacent property. The amount of the reimbursement will be prorated on a net acreage basis (minus street dedicatlan) for the benefited properties. ~a 9 PLANNING LOMM ISS[0 ESOLUTION N0. DEVELOPMENT REV iEN 88-03 - gLAN SMITH June 2Z, 1988 Page 4 (2) Storm drain facilities shall be constructed and an easement provided to convey flaws from Sierra Madre Avenue through the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (3) A 15 foot easement for the future master planned storm drain shall be dedicated along the south pro ~erty iine of the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (4) The storm drain easements shall be accessible by City vehicles. Landscaping within the easements s ha it be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (6) An easement over the internal drive aisles shall be provided to the City to ensure access for City mai nl:enance vehicles to the City storm drain easements. (6) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad communication lines) within the A.T. 6 S.F. Railroad easement shall be paid to the City prior to the Issuance of building permits. The fee shalt be half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the oro iert ct to (1) Hain Street abutting the east property line shall be completed with a modified turn around (18 foot radius) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, 6. The De auty Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resclutlon. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COiMISSIDN OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCMgNCA 9Y: ATTEST: ~-3 a PLANNING LOMMISS IOI E$OLUTlON N0. DEVELOPMENT REV IEN 88-03 - ALAN SMITN June 22, 1988 Page 5 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the ."."-l an ning Commission held on the 22nd day of June. 1988. by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMM [SSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTO Y, ENERiC K, BLAKESLEY, CY.I TIER, MCIii EL NONE NONE ~-~ / M W EE`Yi9i~o`:p: ~~Aa". „- F}° ~ - iY~S'"-~S'~g" =~:.°7_S It_~x~ffS~~EY ~iL9~~ 9€S ~E t~~ES, 'cr-3 r~~r~1~iE`3as -i 5E-_~~ayE Ep='~xi~s_3 ~EC .a $ -~"-fEC~tS i~n'x~5=~~'~ F-Sg ?dz~~=,1? :g°- ~~s E. pY egg ~~185 :g3$s s".=~? :~;^ ~s` a3iy`3 sisFi, ~o~~s ,~; ~a s Eck?~ R~E~3~ ~~ gg: ~y~ Yr _'~_ a~~ ~=s Fji ~e Y6~ s~3 a_ ~~ - ~ ~~ Original Poor Quality ~~ ~~ N a a i .s 79_ii `e `~e~~ 8~~itl asp°--s `•(~~ AYE ri: a~~,ri ~~a~s s g~~~~ ~,7E~.. l,~~SYc ~Pj .! a a~ E~ ~~~ ~7 1I frFy rxa Vg5 ~ns 8~"s ;S~ i~ F~~ ~:i a~~~ r.?_ s:e 3~3= ~:~7 1I a~=aa ':[~Y -~i~~ "-€XE E~ro~9• ~~y~~ ~~'~'i ~~a;~; s 7=~~~~ - ~ ~€'Y ~D aY ~~~ji t_qrq i;ggY~ dE Y~'iu MI a '~ .I d .I ~ a~E~r~ai ~ 5 9 ~se .7-k~: " 4 L-Ea -Y ~ tY . I ~ JI it7]f~~Ea riE b ] ~i t~.t~ia;~i ~ ~~ =s ~ 3~ 'ai s ~~~ ~ .I 3~ s7Yps~z;~ . o r ~i~ s ~ '_ ~~ r~~ 3 r Q~ 1 ~ s ~5 z p : a ~~ 71~r~~~?f a~~~ _~ -s r ~ s 3E•~` i~ ?I , 8 I~'II ~ ~ ~ N ~Y . ~-3 ~ M W =E9r ~g~X .ide ^.;~' ^g.*ESE Sgu a ~.~e g- a g$i gi= e9'. ~=~ ~ e3E'°"~9 ygv ~ "g"~ al C.' a 5_YYE_ a-;p s--a $s:~ pas ~~~xr~~ acy a is_s o~ as xi ~g=~ ~ais~~ga s;a3r ~ r~o _$$F g~ gas. ~^~~ 3_ess,~~ =~s IF 7yd Y r~s., 3= "i_ =sa~~ i~o~s~~~3« ,`~=~rii sus ~ $E~' .::ga is~~3 s~Y.f,,~s it~ ~~=-a~:~ ~~s: s' 3'sg: a .a~W ~4rsi ~,,; ~'a tt~a~g s +'s+~_ d~ --~-a33• s_s e~~ ~~Y-s s a eaa ~J$=;g a3sF ~' F °c gg ~~~g( iS <is":~ ~~~~?~ a~~3Fssa ~ :~~. s~L a~~~ fs a ~a~ a 3~i ~ #~Li E~ ~t~s5 ~~~ ,~ ~~ ~ ~ ^~ ~~ ~ ~ MI gtii Y t5 x $~ 8.= .sl i.S ' ~ 3 ~ ~; 3~ ~ _~± yp~3 ~ 3 jai n i g~2~ ,~ =.C 1 i{i ~ 2= ~s Ep sr "=r s- 3~ - = ~ des j` ~ a ds.s S sa S ~;~ itt ~f ~~ ~ _ .g~ ~„ ~~ ~i Z~~ ~3 ~ e y ~'! a 97 ad = sr f~ d „ °` ~ =~' ~°~a has ~~ ~ a~,~i : `y ~~:~ a~ s ~a ~ a i~ ~~i 8 a ~ a2 ::xs ~x:a aYi ?i ~ ^~ ~ ~ el 3` ~=1sA:~ gi~'s~tl~l~„ s;~y~AE:~ 3z s `s se= -~a 4a:;~ 1a gam:. Q~=_. [ a 3 :~~:~ ~FY a at~Es y~ a~! 5_~i~a 83i~s~ ~.,8 i~a-r fit'=~ s=; a ~~~;~ d3~~~s ;~_;< a a"a.: 3 r ?I;~a asa ~~':~ `u_'se..y B=8§~6 c~~~c~ ~ rD €s ~~3~F; ~ rrag s~_.,~ ~'=a °- s3 ~~ ~ ~= S r~ ~~~~s~ ~?~ .>~ ,I ,I it N a 33 1 i 0 W k~ -:i asM ~ as '~ ~paavns~g~° °a`iai " 'eta ss~i =x gr a~aaoa?~i'~, s~-e ,- 5 ?ax'e Yx~ gg e x~i =t -Y-~"E Sa ._~' SEy ~- _~t S"" ~s?a ~je 9- has -~ r~=~~a«Fg=~ ~r$~~ ~ ~6i= Y= " 5 i -¢ g~". •nsi ea °~ er~ ~=5 ~~t$t$~?x~i g~a s {#~ rzae ~ o ~I ,I ,I ,I ^I ~IOriginai Poc,l(~,.Gy _I ~x3 xF3 ar x~x = 3^:nr r~ g5i ==~i:E ~ -`r :. - 4 C eL DLL i- - YAT^ s Y ~p : ^i y y ys ~p ry r~s ~~ `Y y~ i :i -'~ 3 ~~ ~b~s as Siy S~i~~E t Y ~~-' e - n, a„" ~»~ ij~i 3 ~~ Y~ ~ si ~~~~ a_ irx is-~~g a_ ~- ia- d ~Ye r~°a' ~ t~~. zs; _ g~ i_ns~ E= itto ysdia~3 r gts r r :~ ~i_ ~~ r»~ ~:s gtgr by ~ d e~ ~~a" ~ _» ?~a- i5~i :~a3 ~' -<e ". .O.A~ =<L ii Ga ~G~ !e~ ~ <S`i~~ ~."1Y o"Jl9i 'I _ ~I ;I ~ ~I ,I ~ _I NI :~ o ~3 ~ W ~, 0 U ~Y$ ~5> 38~~ ti~ ~ 3C'' ~~~ey ~~ + 95 S °~~ i~,j 6~"g ~Yg E Z° C3~~5 ~~ •°~.u g8a ~a: E~~~S~ =b~ F s~9i g;y5$ `:~s~ 8 °r Z 5~ i g~- y3Y 3~ pie '~g xa"aFt sa-° ~ ~Fs' ~=Y~ fi~:g ~ eF _sa iii al~§_ ;aF a 3 =3E"` ~Ti ~ + ~ s"~ sus 5~: ~~~y ~_~~ a _~-'° _~+$_~ s°#~3 _x ;r ~!!t y ~ ~^ ~sbF e~'?3 3~cdi esi ~ d~c~' Ei?"s!~ F~~~a ~ ~ ~zi I ~I ~I ^~ 9 ' I ~ I ~I ~ I =~ »I ~_ - .ezg ~ - Si: ~1f ~xR IY Si a»~~ ~ ~„y =a1 i L+x: 39 BEd; - a ~p~: IId3 a ~ii'° +i c~~s F $ '3c Ott ~ +F~r ~~ ~: i3- i_3~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ !~~_ ~ ~ as ~~ ? _ 3"~=~a ;~ r - ilk a+~~ ~N =$ s ~~y~t ~ ~ € Asa ~_'~ a ~,~~~~ ~_~ ~I » ~ I ~~ j ~# 3a i~r g~~ +~3 r ~~i: :3;~ '+r ~~s ~~Ft ~~~~ ,I ~I ~3S S s ~~ js Y ~y5 C j Y» L~ ~r: x~ a~ Z~ ~~ [~~ +S E;~ xa =aY a:s e exs c yx~ .° ,s ~8 ~!s V ~• »I~I u ao ~ , n~ ~~~o 0 0 ~~ I~ ~ ~ fi, T ~~ t~~ °o~ ~, u N ps 33 [a ~3C+ g=a= j~~,~ ~z 1}~~ 3 ~+ ~~~ ~i M u ` d Y `$"e $; sa i 3 s ease xxa f8ia_s ~ s ~ @ fa - s =a $ ~ff d: x i~~a fs i ~ i S 'S Dr :~r~~ 7ri' ig ~~ aI al al '; : 3 I g '~iY °~~_ a"Cax~~a 3 xY""~ xi = e s : $r i ! ~,x;_ !E €g js E~_b~~3 C=C Y ~~ ,'~~ 9 3 3 3 S~`` C' Y ~$~{; as ~ a;rs !_~ ~ ~aj~ <`o tso ~~ D u " _ V S « ~I ~I el rl ~ ~ ~ ~I ~: it a~ a `y! 5i~ •~ k E iaie S"~ '~`Y i3 ss° ~ ~ _ ! ~ ~",r jai ~'~ ~` x~ ai .;= a ag~~' t~ i oyi; ~ gi cs9ya T~ s a~ a~ !s~' _:~ a=J~3 ~= f j ~~! ssa~ aeig~ ~~ j iii 9 s~°~~ ~! a ? a+! D aYY! [~!: x! Y3 !~ ~~sM ~ ? h~ rd ~ 3 dpD~~ ii't ~Fzit ~'a T _3 leY~'~ ~ i- ° r~t S" 3sl~ ~g3 ~ ~. ; Fi 7 _:^. i1 E~y~~ ~~JYj ~~~ r ~ ~ Ps ~ is w ~ lard I~~ r^~g ~r a rS-i =„ ~aE'~ F" °~ jzl~! i sl~Eri W~~ W~# ~~ ~aiD: .d ~~~~' ~"i ,~ ~ ~f~ja_ ~Sis d€_a?i ~~ ~I ~I a~ ~I ~I I ~ ~I a-3.c ~o O iR ~' r ^_, s W s;;, s!s 3 x a~xx3 s`F~S ~ Ea€ y ap aa$9s _g s 9 ~ 9 ~aa xe etc°: s`^ :3~ " Ig -r r" ~ „ ~. r __. "'~! - 4 '~~Sa` ~ i 9 y~ a ~Sg ~s ~~~e ;fig ^'e~ s h~ ~ ";s = ' sa "s ~.~ i~ a9 8 ~ 8Y °P~ ?g aas ~ ~~ ~~~~ ! g~ ~ a a~- ~a .3 "s.asE s 5 g8~i ~ $eV _ '~aa3 a iY ~ ~~ a €n: ~ ' ~ ~~ ~~~a ; H= $ ~ ~~ a 5'~ as x€g~, ~a aai a r~ ~~ ~- x~ at a& ~ sr 3 ~~~ ~~ s~_ r~ -s° ~ .,asaF d• ;- s: ~ ?x a `es i:, aas""S~ ~ ~~` "y ~s - .. i is ~~ $ ~~' ~ ~ ~e ttS r a "-.s i5 W'~ a-° ;~ ,~i .e i ~i _ d~E3' :F: e ~ ~I ~I ~I ~~riginal Poor r ,.;y a~ YT is -V ~c ,; •s 's r~ Ox Ya g~~ asi it D V Ea 2 3 3? ~ ' " i :: S~ s ga 3+! a a xa ~ ; g ~ •] ~ ; ~+s ~: i y a ~s .I y': ~ Y3 i ~~ ~' f t ~ _ ~ ii n}, as ~ ~a5 ? r j V~ j Fj~ ~j " ~~ ! Wi s31 :-'.' ~ P .~ ry~ ~I as ~~ "aas. ^ ~~ ib a 33° =_.: E as is q~ A~ s ~,s- e ~~~ ~_ ~~s 3d~ ~3~~5 ~s a ~i s -€a L- s~' iY i _I~ ~ la_ ~ '[~1y ~ ica~~ ~ _a~ a~ 3iY lL r~s „L Y~ ~~~ s ~a TLi $a_ .. _~~ ° ' ~~ ~i~ i;a ~ : ~_ ~~ ~ _r 1 ~i~ _ ~~~~~ ~ twg ~~3 1 d E~~i~a g~~ a~: Fula sa?~ .`a3 ~`~ ~ ~ r ~~= ~ I I 9x= ~~ n W 6 of ~S x ~' ~y ~3 ~~ `5` ~.~ @s ssa r ge .fi ga. ~YY gsN ~3~ ~~9 ~. ~ € !3. «$~ ~Y~ 'S. i<3 Origrna~ root ~tU~ury ~I a €:aa j5~ `•? i~~p Y SY ~~S= ~ ,.. e~ ~~~j ••O ~~ O'~~ s x~ ~'!~ a= ~~~~ s~ :~~ i arZ~ Y -_y . ~~ t~~=! r: s ~ s`:i ~ °pi ~~ ~~~ s,~; ~~+~ s u~~ ; ~gc~ 3 _sc° 1 ~~g~ a. ~'~~_ ~~ s ~ ~ ~i~r !y : _ i ~'~' :~~: ~s •I yl jl e ~,~ ' ~ "' a E 11 ~~ ~ R ~' ~ ; is~ ~ r Y sys ~ is =~ ~'~ ! ~ll ~: ~~~~s E g!~ ~~ ~y s a. ~~ ~l~s ~s ; ~~ i° ~~ ~ e~ ~3 V e .~ 3 $ ~~: ~Y ?na ~^= $ SYy h~ 8 ~k s=~ ~ ~a~ ;a ~~~ ~~= 2a a.~i 2 i~~ D! =5g ~3s es ~; ~ s'a ». - Y =k S ; 5 I1~ __~ ~ ~__ :-. s}~ a° t sr ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ t~~i YeL ~~3 T~ RESOLUTION N0. ~'v -~lJ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TIME E%TENSION FOR DESIGN REVIEW N0. 88-03, AND DENYING THE APPEAL THEREOF, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 20 APARTMENT UNITS ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RES IOENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE END 6F SIERRA MAD RE AVENUE, WEST OF EDN IN STREET, AND MAKING F[NOINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals (f) Alan Smith, on behalf of the A.E. Smith Company, has filed an application fnr approval of a Time Extension for Design Review No. 86-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension of Design Review 88-03 is referred to as "the Time Extension." Cucamonga )conduct dga sdu8y nut~cedhpubl is nhearing onsthe su bjectCma tter ofnthe Time Extension, and fol lowing the conclusion of said hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 90-106 there6,7• approving the Time Extension. (iii) the applicant has filed a timely appeal of the approval represented in said Resalul:ion No. 90-106 on the basis on a condition contained in said Resolution. The condition appealed is described as follows: (a) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the a DOi Kant !'•h011 rnnennf fn ,..:._~...- . the establishment of a Mel l~o-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project sfto to Frovide, in conjunction with the aDPlicabie School District, for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any School District itas previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing Distrfct prior to the issuance of building permits. Further, if the affected School Distrfct has not formeG a Mello-Rnos Cnmanln icy Facilities District within 12 months of the date of approval of the time extension and prior to the retardation of the Final Map or issuance of building penlits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. ~-3 9 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. DR 88-03 - A. E, SMITH September 5, 1990 Page 2 (iv) On the 5th of September, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal of the Time Extension and, on said date, concluded the public hearing. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental !)ual ity Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of the mitigated negative Oecla rat ion issued on August 8, 1990. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above referenced September 5, 1990 hearing, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced August 8, 1990 Planning Commission meeting and Lhe contents of Planning Conmliss ion Resolution No. 90-106, this Council specifically finds as follows: (a) The Time Extension applies to property located at the terminuses of Main Street and Sierra MaAro aunmm /0oN ?nv-oct_vot ..z ~,.z, .~,_ Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre); (h) the property to the north, west, and south of the subject site is within the Medium-High Residential Development District and is currently developed with single family homes and apartment units to the north and west, respectively, with the A.T. 8 S. F. railroad and vacant sand to the south; (c) The Tfine Extension is for the development of a 20-unit apartment complex on 1.08 ac re5 of land; (d) The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-106, spec ificaily Condition No. 3.(c) - (The School Mitigation Condition) is necessary for compliance with Urgency Ordinance No. 395, pertaining to the evaluation of adequate school facilfties for proposed residential development; ~ y~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. DR BR-03 - A.E. SMITH September 5, 1990 Page 3 (e) The Chaffey Joint Union High School District informed the City that there is insuff icent capacity to handle this project and that a Mello-Roos District is being farmed. (f) The Time Extension, with the addition of the standard school condition, as specified, i5 ronsistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and is not iikeiy to cause public health and safety problems. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The Time Extension is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; (b) The design or improvements of .the Time Extension are consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (c) The subject site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of l:he proposed development is not likely to cause substantial environmental d;;ma ge or avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; (e) The development is not likely to cause serious health problems; and (f) The design of the development will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed development. 5: Based upon the findings and conclusions =_e*. forth ir, paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby denies the applicant's appeal and approves the Tfine Extension subject to all of the Conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-106. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to Alan Smith of A.E. Smith Company that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. ~/ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. DR 88-03 - A.E. SMITH September 5, 1990 Page 4 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho directed to: (a) certify t~ the adoption of this forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution return-receipt requested, to Alan Smith at the address records. fucamunga is hereby Resolution, and (b) by certified mail, identified in City a~~ UrrY ue' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~. DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Gra hn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANC INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 69-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the circulation element of the Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 5) for the deletion of 7th Street between Hermosa Avenue and Center Street - APN: 209-261-09 and 30. RECOMMENOAT ION: The Planning Commission recommends City Council approval of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-03 and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. [f the City Council concurs, the attached Ordinance should be ado Dted. BACKGROUND; The Planning Div is ton received an application (Development Review 89-11) for development of an industrial project located at the southeast corner of Nermosa Avenve and 7th Street. The application proposes aeveiopment witn in oeo ica teo, out not aeveiopea, itn street rights-of-way betweer, Hermosa Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel. Directly east of the proposed project is an existing industrial development, located at the southwest corner of 7th Street and Center Street between Center Street and the channel. The existing project was permitted to vacate their portion of 7th Street and develop on-site improvements in what would have been 1th Street rights-of-way. Approval of Development Review 89-11 is therefore, contingent upon approval of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-03 as the project is inconsistent with the specific plan circulation concept. ANALYSIS: The circulation concept and street patterns of the Industrial Specific Plan were designed to provide an acceptable level of service on all streets to ensure free flowing traff it and proper means of access for all Dropert ie s. To provide ade vua to ou bl is access to ad.iac ent pa rte ii, the specific plan iden is if ies ith Street between iie rmosa Avenue and Center Street as two east-west cut-de-sacs separated by the Deer Creek Channel. Bridging of the channel at 7th Street for traffic purposes was not planned as past studies indicated that its construction was not necessary for adequate circulation, evident by 1th Street terminating in cul-de-sacs at the channel. Adequate access can 6e 2 y3 CITY LOUNL IL STAFF REPORT ISPA 89-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 Page 2 accomplished through site design and driveway locations sensitive to circulation needs of this and adjacent parcels, which is provided for in the development application. The Cucamonga County Water District will be maintaining an easement along what would have been the centerline for 7th Street. Staff has rece rued correspondence from the Cucamonga County Water District stating that they are not opposed to the 7th Street vacation, provided their easement remains intact. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In reviewing the proposed amendment, the Planning Commission determined that the following findings could be made: a. That the proposed Industrial Specific Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts; and b. That the proposed Industrial Specific Plan Amendment provides fora circulation concept consistent with the General Plan; and c. That the proposed Industrial Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Inland Valle Dail Bulletin newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a 1 property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Respec ly sub tied, Brad er City P anner BB :TG:mlg Attachments: Minutes of June 21, 1990~Planning Commission Meeting Pla nninq Commission Staff Report of June 27, 1990 Piann tng Commission Resolution Ho. 90-"00, Recumne admy Approval Ordinance Adopting Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-03 * 4 * R f G. H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the circulation element of the Industrial Specific Plan ;Subarea 5) for the deletion of Seventh Street between Hermosa Avenue and Center Street - APN: 209-261-09 and 30. Associated with Chis project is Development Review 89-t1. (Continued from June 13, 1990.) ~, coo rnnR - ine suoa ivis ion of 8,38 ac rez of land into 14 parcels for .r'°strial use in the General lndustr'al Oistr is t, Subarea ^f the Indu sir iai Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Seventh Street - APN: 209-261-09 and 30. (Continued from June 13, 1990.) N, inn ueve io pmenc or ten inau5triaV buildings to tolfng 158,420 square feet on 8,38 acres of land in the General Industrial Oistric t, Subarea 5 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Hermosa Rvenue and Seventh Street - APN: 209-261-09 and 30. Associated with this project is Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-03. Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, Commissioner Melcher asked for clarification regarding the Cucamonga County Water District site. Mr. Grahn stated that the site is located just north of the northern driveway. t:ommrssioner neicner asR ed it Cucamonga Cuun iy iia ier Diai.r ici waa uppw eu iu the vacation of Seventh Street. Mr. Grahn responded that Cucamonga County Water District will maintain an easement running along the north property line and did not oppose the vacation request so long as the easements remain intact. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing; but hearing no testimony, he closed it. Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney, suggested adding a finding that the vacation of Seventh Street is consistent with the General Plan. Commissioner Chi ti ea wanted to be sure that the circulation remains open to LHo Geer crook Channel. Mr. Grahn responded that the Development Review is conditioned to require that reciprocal easement for the pedestrian connection to the Deer Creek Channel be delineated on the Parcel Map and CC6RS. Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 27, !990 ~yS 8a rrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated a similar condition is included in the Parcel Map Resolution. Motion: Moved by Chiti ea, seconded by Melcher, to adopt the Resolutions recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment R9-03, approving Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 12464 with modification to find that the vacation of Seventh Street is consistent with the Ge:ieral Plan, and approving Environmental Assessment and Development Review 89-11. Motion ca rrf ed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHI TI EA, MCNIEL, MELCHER LADES: L^uMM iSSiON ERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISStnN ERS: TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER -carried :.~.. 6PERTI S - The development of a neighborhood commerc iai shoppin acen ter c fisting of 12 retail buildings arM one day care build in otalin 119, 4 square feet on 14.1 acres of land within the Terra V a Planned Commun located at the southeast corner of Milliken A ue and Base Line Roa - APN: 221-151-13. Brett Horner, As is to Planner, presented the staff re Chairman McNiel open the public hea rf ng. Richard Mager, Western Pr roes, 1156 North untain, Upland, requested that the Resolution be changed reflect tha a name Of the applicant to 6e Lewis Development Co. HP m,act al ,.+f~...:... - Conditional Use Permits for propo fr standing buildings. .`~ ~~R ~~~ "y ui Mr. Horner responded that any us h would normally require Conditional Use Permits would require one, reas a use which would normally require a Gevelopmen t/Design Review wo be process by way of a Development/Design Review. nr, Mager questioned t noise level maximums and nested that L levels be taken into account w considering the noise levels. Mr. Horner stat L levels could be addressed if staff a to receive a complaint. Chairman iel stated that the noise levels aDDly to exterior noise ve15. Mr. M er requested that staff have discretion to approve some ou 'de shop ng cart storage, so long as the area is adequately screened. Planning Commission Mfnutes -6- dune 27, 1990 aye CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cpmmiss'^n FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Gra hn, AssiSta nt Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDM NT 89-03 - CITY OP RANCHO CUC ONGA - request to amend the circulation element of the Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 6) for the deletion of 7th Street between Hermosa Avenue and Center Street - APN: 209-261-D9 and 30 Associated with [his project is Development Review 89-11. (Continued from June 13, 1990.) ABSTRACT: This report Ore Bents an amendment to the Industrial reT1 a Specific Plan to allow for the vacation of a portion of 7th Street, II. BACKGROUND: The Planning Divisior~ received an application DR 89-I1 for the development of an industrial project located at the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 7th Street. The a ppl?cation proposes development within a dedicated, but not J eve iu yeJ, iLi, ~LreeL rigll L-Ui-way pecween Hermosa Nvenue anp cne Deer Creek Channel. III, ANALYSIS: Industrial Specific Plan Circulation Concept: The circulation concept of the Industrial Specific Plan estabiis hes a basic one mile gridiron street pattern broken down fnto one-half, one-quarter, and one-eighth mile intervals !see Exhibit "B"). The street pattern was designed to provide an acceptable level of service on all streets within the Specific Plan area to ensure free flowing circulation and to provide a proper means of access for all properties. Seventh Street was planned as a 66 foot right-of-way local industrial street. figure IY-7 of the Specific Plan shows the street pattern of Subarea 5 (see Exhibit "D"). The subarea map identifies 1th Stree4 between Hermosa Avenue and Center Street as Cwo east-west cul-de-sacs separated by the Oeer Creek Channel, Therefore, the portion proposed to be vacated was planned only as a local industrial street and is not needed to serve as a collector street. ~y7 PLANNING COMMIS5I0 .TAPE REPORT ISPA 89-03 - LI iY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 27, 1990 Page 2 6. Ex ist ing Dedication: The street dedication for 7th Street between Hermosa Avenue anA the Deer Creek Channel currently exists (see Exhibit "F"), but the street dedication for 7th Street between the Deer Creek Channel and Center Street has already been vat ated, An existing development located at the sou thwe s*. cc rn er cf Street and Center Street was permitted to vacate their portion of 1th Street and develop on-site improvements in what would have been the 1th Street right-of-way. The Cucamonga County Na ter District will be maintaining an easement along what would have been the centerline for 7th Street. Staff has received correspondence from the Luca mo nga County Na ter Cistr ict stating they are not opposed to the 7th Street vacation, provided their easement remains intact. C. Traffic Enoinee rino Considerations: The future bridging of the Deer Creek Channel at 7th Street for tra ff it purposes was not planned because past studies have indicated that the con stru~tion is not necessary for adequate circulation. This intent is indicated on the map of Subarea 5, Figure I'J-7, showing 7th Street as terminating in cut-de-sacs at the Deer Creek Channel. So°t-t` Ct, cct ie mown oetwe en Hermosa Avenue and the Ceer Creek Channel to assure adequate public access to the .joining parcels. This access tan also be accomplished by aceouatz driveway and site design, which is provided by the proposed development. Therefore, Traffic Engineering concurs with the proposed 7th Street vacation. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before approving the Specific Plan Amendment, the Piann ing Commission must determine Lhat the amendment will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. [n addition, the proposed amendment is ~onsis tent with the intent of the General Dlan and the Industrial Sp e<.i fic Plan. CiiVIRONM FHTAI giGr SO1'PO'' Gta T`f hd5 completed Parts 1 and IS of the Initial Study Ja nd has fount ne significant environmental impacts as a consequence of this amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan. VI, CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in hie Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property posted with the supplemental notification sign, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 f¢et of the pro jn:t site. `( 0 °'.ANN ING COMMISSIO ,TAPE REPORT ;SnA 89-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J'INE ?7, 1990 'ale 3 i;;. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plann ~g Commission recomae nd approval of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-03 and issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Ccu ncil through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully Submitted, Brad B er Ci nner v' BB TG• Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan DR 89-11 Exhibit "8" - ISP Figure II-3 Exhibit "C" - ISP Figure II-3, Amended Exhibit "D" - ISP Figure IV-7 Exhibit "E" - ISP Figure IV-7, Amended Exhibit "F" - Assessor Parcel Mao 209-26 Exhibit "G" - General Plan Map Resolution of Approval a y9 Original Poor Quality .. ~ .~ G'~.`,. ____ ~~ _ ,~.~.~ ~ ._._..~ -- - - - y Iii ~ ` ~ ~ 1;3 ~~1 ~ -- 8: -i ~! s: i ~; ~ ~ J ~ `-' j -- ~, I~ _ ~J 1- < ~ j - i ~! ~! E t = ~ ~ rlfi2. I _ - _F_ ~ r S ,~ _ _ C ii i 9i ' $~ ~ ~ e • , ' k = e F f F I =` ~ c~ ~ i r ~ F _ ~ _ ~, - ~ _~ - ~ CI1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM., ~' ~,' ~J~ PLANNING DIVISION T~n.E: ~ II ~ > >, ~.'' ' N II _ E~aalsrr: scnl.e: " ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ U w 1 U 3 p3 J ~ Y y ~ :~ ~ WJ n R ~ ~ ~ v < i~ k QJ I I ~ 1 ~~ ~i T ~ ~~ ~/ x ~ j _-1- U ti 1 ~,(~ _ -_P.+ 1~ J~ W ~ e-~ T. ~' H W U a ~ ~ N U ~ O J ~g Y W ~ i~ y ¢CCg~~xxuw~ d ~ W ~~¢ i u i ~ z R ~ ~ asp x ~I, '' U J _: > W U r i 9 LL ~ a i~ E _a 8 ! ~ x a ~ ~r °~ $ o ' ~ Y ~ $ ~~ i ! S ~ } # : WI R 8 S s ~ ! ~I~ • 1~ l~T~® . :b~~,,.~ 1~vv! 4,.......J ~ ~ _ F ^ i-n ~yy 9! z. ~~ ~y ~a a^ 3$i Ei~ E:~ €1=~ $~~ 7EE ~~~ U U v; X ~~ LL ~ ¢ ~ Y ~ ~ ~~ a i~ ~~~ ~~~~a iHq 8 ~' a '~" ~ ~ _^ S ' ' JC'r~ ~Illy'~~~~~ ~~ ' LL ~~_ .<° ~ i ... .. .~ ~$ V -. I~. U 'n w = c . ~ E ~ Y Y ~]~ d~ ~ $ C7 'Y ¢'~ O a .a ~ ~ .-»- ai ,~ ~9~ ~~~~ ~di ~ 0 ~W U ~sy W y V O P OQ Op j Qlfl UpQ e ` 3' L ¢ Q1~~ P G ~~ T O ,~ Uf c 0 2 0 a 0 L` Yi- ~[\ C .~ ~ O ~ L N _ h O Q ~'{ ~/ M1 f Q~ ~ ' U ~ ~ 55- u~:a~.~~, r~..r 4uG~r~y u~ ~_ ~ ~`1 _'r--~' ,.1"`~ r ~" I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG PLANNING DIVISION r ud ~~ ~ ,~ q., ~~ J 1 ~ J } ~ CL Z -~. 'tiJ '4 A 't1TLE: ~. 1~. r i N i. EXHIBTf: i:J KALE: -' ~~~ RESOLUTION N0. 90-80 A RESOLUTION OF 'THE PLANNING LOMM ISS ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMEND ING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03, AMENDING FIGURE II-3 AND FIGURE IY-?, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has initiated an application for Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-G3 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Specific Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." {ii) On June 27, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appiicat ion and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to Che adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B, Resolution. sOw, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Pis nning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: t. Ihis Commission hereby specifically finds that atl of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resd lu tion are true and correct. ~. mac^' ~!~~" substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hear ng u.. J,;ac 27, ,oon, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission nere uy specifically finds as follows: (a) The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact an the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study, Part lt; and (b) The proposed amendment is necessary to allow for the deletion cf 7th Street between Hermosa Avenue and Center Street. ?, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during thf above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and cant iudes as follows: !a} That the proposed amendment is consfstent with the objectives of the industrial Specific Dlan, and the purposes of the District in which the site is located, ~,~~ PLANNING COMMi55I0N RESOLUTION N0. 90-80 ISPA 89-03 -CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGA JUNE 27, 1990 Page 2 (b) That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (t) That the proposed amendment is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. (d) That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the o of ec Lives of the General Plan or the Industrial Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental quality Act of 1910 and, further, this Commis lion hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Dei Tara Lion. 5. Based upon Che findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-03, amending Figure II-3 and Figure IV-7 (attached). 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE. 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Conan is slon of the City of Ra n<: ho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning CommissLle of [ne City pf Rancho Cucanonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1990, by the following vote-Lo-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CCMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER asp a J ~ 7 7 W ~ R ro~ 3 ~U t ~ i~ II-18 ~~ /9 n I LL a ~ - aa y ~ 8 = t W ~ ~ ~~ N ~ a° 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 V I Q f = ~^ ~' 1T E I • ~' . ~ ~ ~~ ~ _a b~ iS~ ai jY{a ~q[[ i~d 5!Z ass ~:~ 2~~ a3 ~~! ~~s ~fy IV-38 ago ORDINANCE N0. ~ 0~~1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL DF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03, AMENDING FIGURE I1-3 AND FIGURE IV-7, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On dune 21, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public head ng with respect to the above-referenced Industrial Specific Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-80, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-03. (ii) On September 5, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Section 1: This Council herebv soeci fies and finds that ail of tha facts set fort'n in the Recitals, Part A, of the ordinance are true and correct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certf ff es that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmxntal Quality Act of 1910, and further, this Lou nc it hereby issues a Negative Declaration. Section 3: The Rancho Lucamo nga City Council finds as follows: (a) That the proposed amendment is consistent with the obi ec tfves of the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the Distrfct fn which the site is located; and (b) .That the proposed amendment will not be detrinentai to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C~ ~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. ISPA 89-03 - CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 Page 2 (c) That the proposed amendment is in compliance with each of the applicable prov isf ons of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Industrial Specific Plan. Section 4: That pursuant Lo Section 65850 to 65855 of the Cal~forn is Government Lade, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ire reby approve on the 5th day of September 1990, lndustr ial Specific Pian Amendment 89-03 amending Figure II-3 and Figure IV-7 as follows: Figure IS-3: (Attached.) Fiqu re IV-7: (Attached.) Sec lion 5: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance anld sha l~ cause the same to be published wf thin fifteen (15) days after its passage at tea st once in The Inland Yalle Dail Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. a 6 a- ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~'~~ Illl~i* ~c: 11-18 a ~ - as F~ ': }J,~ jyy~i~ gx # -§ _ :'. w ~ ~ d • 1 '~ 71 O O /~ \~ ~• Y- ~~ ~~ f$ f~ ~± s~~ 5~y~ g'~ ~;~ :~Y ~~y 7EE ~e€ \'- 3'-. OR DINP.N CE N0. ~ D AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMON GA, CALIFORNIA AODiNG NEW SECTIONS 2.12.030 AND 2.12.040 TO CHAPTER 2.i2 OF T[TLE 2 OF THE RANCHO CU CAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, THEREBY REQUIRING POSTING OF AGENDAS AND PROV ICING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PUBLIC TG RDDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL A. Recitals. (i) Whereas the State Legislature has suspended Government Cede Section 54954.? which requires that agendas be posted at least seventy-two (72) hours before a regular meeting of the legislative body and the committees and boards appointed thereby. (ii) Whereas the State Legislature has suspended Government Code Section 54954.3 which provided that every agenda for a regular meeting shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to di rectiy address the legislative bodies and items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter of jurisdiction of such legislative body. (iii) The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga believes Lhat such provisions are necessary and appropriate to insure the pu6l ic's full parti ci patron in the well-being and affairs of the City and so desires to set forth such provisions in the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (iv) That all legal nreranni <i tec to thu ,dn nr; oo „s r~,:: n..e;..]G-e have occurred. 6. Ordinanre. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: City finds in all respects as set forth fn Section A, Recitals, he rot na bove. SECTION 2: Anew Section 2.12.030 is hereby added to Chapter 2.12 of Title 2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 9.t2 non n„o„a~• os tin^. A^rior - - _, ..-_.__~ _ y, thcr Ater i. "A. At least seventy-two (72) hours before a regular meeting, the City Council, or its designee, shall post an agenda containing a brief yene ral description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. The agenda shall specify the time and location of the regular meeting and shall be posted in a location that is freely acres si ble to members of the public. No action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. a~~ Ordinance No. *** Page 2 "B. Notwithstanding Subsection A above, the City Council may take action on items of business not appearing in the posted agenda under any of the following conditions: "1. Upon a determination by a majority vote of Lhe City Council that an emergency situation exists, as such is defined in Section 54956.5 of the Government Code, as amended. "2. Upon a determination by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the City Council, or, if less than two-thirds (2/3) of the members are present, a unanimous vote of those members present, that the need to take action arose subsequent to the agenda heing posted as specified in Subsection A. "3. The item was posted pursuant to Subsection A for a prior meeting of the City Co uncii occurring not more than five (5) calendar days prior to the date action is taken on the item, and at the prior meeting the item was continued to the meeting at which action is being taken." SECTION 3: R new Section 2.12.040 is hereby added to Chapter 2.12 of Title 2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniti pal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: "2.12.040 Opportunity for Public to Address Le9l slative 9ody; RcSU', ations. "A. Every agenda for a regular meeting shall provide an opportunity for members of the ou6lic to directly address the Citv Council on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter of jurisdiction of the City fo until, provided that no acti nn shall 6e taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by Subsection B of Section 2.12.030. However, in the case of a meeting cf the City Council, the agenda need not provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on any item that has already been considered by a committee, composed exclusively of members of the City Council, at a pub? is meeting wherein all interested members of the public were afforded the opportunity to address the committee on the item, unless the iter.~ has been substantially changed since the committee heard the item, as determined by the City Council. "B. She City Council may adopt reasonable regulations to insure r har the nr enr ~f Su hse^_fi o.^. ^ is carried ^"t ^~ludi r.g, but ^^t limited to, regulations limiting the total of~ time allocated for public testimony and particular issues and for each individual speaker." O ~ Ordi name No. *** Page 3 SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason deemed unto nstituti anal, invalid or unenforceable by the detf Sion of any court of competent jurisdiction, this decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adapted this Ordinance any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or po; ti on thereof, irrespet ti ve of the fact that any one or more sertions, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or other portions might be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation pu6l fished in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~~D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG9 STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council rROM: Duane A. Raker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: ORDINANCE REIMHTATZNO POATIOAB OP TEE HAOIRI ACT IRTO TH8 RANCHO COCAMONGA MWTICIPAL CODE Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance and set it for second reading. The requirements for the posting of agendas and for opportunities for public address to the city Council or part of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code this ordinance will reinstate. Backexound During the recent budget session in Sacramento, the State Legislature suspended Government Code Section 54954.2 and 54954.3 which required agendas be posted at least 77 hrnirs MP„rc o _e-~~?~- meeting of the Legislative body and the committees and rboards appointed thereby, and also requiring an opportunity on every agenda for members of the public to directly address the Legislative body. Because of the City's firm belief in the democratic process, the City Council has asked the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance which would reinstate those particular provisions and make them part of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The new ordinance reinstates the provisions suspended by the Legislature by adding new sections 2.12.030 and 2.12.040 to Chapter 2.12 of Title 2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Respectfully sfuhmi**ad;/; DAB/tlr DAA:468 Attachment a~s° (Page 1) Marilyn Katz and Neil Katz 7684 Gainey Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (71.4) 941-0771 AugusC 25, 1990 T0: Mayor, Members of the City Council, Building & Planning Division and Engineering Division FROM: Marilyn & Neii Katz SUBJECT: Request City Council's permission for final inspection and release of utilities on Lot N24 Tract k13644 I. BRIEF HISTORY A• August 1988 Faye Stanger, Sales Rep. for Woodridge Estates LTD, told us house would be completed North 1989 on Lot N24 B. September 16. 1988 Entered escrow with Woodridge Estates LTD-Nordic Dev. Co. to purchase Lot N24 C. February 1989 Cement slab poured and Faye Stanger said the the house would be completed within 6 months D. September 1 1989 Woodridge Estates LTD wrote letter notifying us about completion date of 11/7/89 E. January 24, 1990 Woodridge Estates LTD wrote letter revising completion date to 3/2/90 F. April 1990 Mr. ]ia nk Stanger tells us that the completion date will be 5/15/90 G. Late June/Early July 1990 Carpet and Floor rile !.nstalled h. Carly Julv 1990 Faye Stanger says Ei nal Inspection will be done "Wednesday next week " I. Mid July Joe (Woodridge building foreman) says final inspection will be Thursday, July 26th a~~ .: ~. (Page 2) J. Au¢ust 13. 1990 Joe informs us chat Lot p24 cannot get a final inspection "because of the Ciey " II. BACKGROUND A. Harried with Cwo children 6. Neil Katz, Optometrist- Offices in Rancho Cucamonga and Upland un~iiyu Torigoe Katz, vpcomecrisc- Oftrce in Montclair C. Renting small house for two years. Since it was considered a short temporary residence, we still have boxes, appliances and furniture in storage D. Sold our home in Northern California in October 1988 E. We are very anxious to move into the new house on Lot#24 so that we can enjoy the future with our new neighbors and friends F. We're caught in the middle--with an unmotivated builder on one side III. REQUEST A. City Council's permission for a final inspection and the release of utilities on Lot #24 in Tract #13644 so coat we may continue with the walk-through inspection and subsenuent closing of escrow, Please put discussion of this matter on agenda for Council Meeting on SepCember 5, 1990. Thank you, Sincerely you/1/rLs(~~, ~~ Bari y 4ei1 Katz a- ~v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst IZ SUBJECT: CON8ID8RATION OF A R880LOTION IIR8IN0 ADOPTION OP CONBERVATZON N8A8IIR$e TO MITZOATE T88 8P88CT8 OP T88 1990 CALZPORNI)+ DROOOHT RBCOmmeadatiOa It is recommended that the City council adopt the attached resolution urging conservation measures to mitigate the effects of the 1990 California drought. eac~grouad Recently, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District submitted a -- _ c„ __~ .+neervatit~n measures with regards to the current drought. This City Council referred the resolution to the Environmental Management Commission for its review and recommendation. The Environmental Management Commission has reviewed the resolution and is recommending the attached resolution be considered for adoption by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, 111 .]nP fJ'hPgl Management Analyst 11 DO/tlr D0:467 Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 90-+3,"~~.5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING ADOPTION OP CONSERVATION MEASURE.4 TO MITIGATE TH6 6PF8CT3 OF TH8 1990 CALIFORNIA DROUGHT WNEREA$, California Se entering a fourth consecutive year of below normal precipit atien; antl WHBAeAS. preMpitst'_oa -. the current water year hoe been eubatantially below normal in the watersheds of the Imported water euppliee serving Southern California, and many communit iee in the State will suffer Water shortages; and WHEREAS, the Chino Groundwater Basin euppliee a eubatant ial amount o£ the water used in Weet San Bernardino County but ie dependent upon supplemental euppliee imported from the State Water Project to meet all of the water demnnde in the ^Weet End"; and WH8REA5, the proper management of the local groundwater supply, ae supplemented by imported euppliee, mandates that appropriate water conservation measures De undettakon to protect and conserve iheee eupplLee; and WH8R8A3, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Xeriscepe Ordinance January SI, 1990 with the purpose and intent of eatabliehing p water conservation plan to reduce water consumption in the landscape environment; and WHEREAS, addit ionel measures such ae waste water reclamation and reuse; development of conjunctive use programs; and protection Of the wality Of arnnndwaro. ~,.___C _..J,.... ..e e..wua nyen. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ZT RESOLVED, that the C!ty of Rancho Cucamonga urges all local county, tit Se9, and other local entities in the area to adopt a Conservation Ordinance deeL9ned to mitigate the effects of the contLnuing drought during calendar year 1990. _ .l-i-, 0 ~O ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAh10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE September 5, 1990 1U Mayor and Member of the City Council 7 1TiCLi. Clyde A. Boyd, Chairman, Public Safety Commissiar ~% BY: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manag~- -z ~~ SUBJECT: False Alarm Ordinance Ilndate On March 7, 1990, the City Council enacted Ordinance 409 and Resolution No. 90-108 (Exhibit A and B) which established a mechanism to levy service charges for false alarms. Since the ordinance was adopted, staff has been working with a subcommittee of the Public Safety Commission to oversee implementation of the ordinance and address concerns raised by citizens and alarm companies. On May 9, 1990, the subcommittee, slat(, and the police met with representatives of the alarm companies to discuss their concems regarding the new ordinance end its implementation, The subcommittee listened to the alarm companies' concerns and adopted some of their suggestions on educating the public and on what information to track. Also, at this subcommittee meeting it was derided that a great deal of emphasis was needed m me area of public education so that eaforccment of [he new ordinance would not come as a surprise and so that people would start becoming more conscientious about their alarm systems. To fulfill the obligation to educate the public on this orAinance, a number oC materials have been prepared and distributed to help inform the public about the ordinance and its provisions. First, the Orst two months of the ordinance, May and June, were used as a grace period during which the City was able to refine its administration of the new program while allowing citi zens to become accustomed to the new ordinance, Even whits the grace period was ie effect, many effons were hein¢ made to agareaetvely intor[n the public of the ordinanc^. Every time an officer responds to a false alarm, a door hangar (Exhibit C) is left at the site. The door hangar has two parts. The first pan is Ie0 at the site and a detachable card is tamed in by the officer to use for administering the program. The door hangar spells out the provisions end service charges associated with the ordinance. this is the first type of information about the ordinance a citizen receives. ~ ~3 False Alarm Update September 5. 1990 Page 2 When a paaieular location has two false alarms, a letter is sent asking for their cooperation in correcting the problem and reminding them that a service charge will be assessed on the third false alarm. A copy of this letter is attached as Exhibit D. Another letter that has been sent to help educate the public was directed to financial institutions such as banks. This letter (Exhibit E) was sent on May 24, 1990 and was directed to financial institutions in an effort to reduce 211 (armed robbery) false alarms, These false alarms arc problematic because of iha procedures which sometimes require the officers to respond with their weapons drawn. This significantly inercases the risk to officers, employees, and patrons of the institution alike and is unacceptable. A general information flier has also been used to educate the public. This Flier (Exhibit F) was distributed on June 13, 1990 at the Civic Center, Police Station, Community Centers and the Chamber of Commerce. Finally, a number of press releases were issued to help spread the word about the ordinance, A press release was issued on March 22, 1990 (Exhibit G) announcing the new ordinance and an article appeared in the Fall 1990 issue of the Grapevine (Exhibit FI). Also gross releases were distributed on June 12, 1990 to the Chamber Resource, on June 15, 1990 [o the Inland Va114y Daily B'1L I¢tin and ~e_Sya, and on June 18, 1990 to the cable television community access channels. The June 18th press release and a corresponding article are attached as Exhibits 1 and ]. The months preceding the implementation of the ordinance saw false alarms averaging aver 40U each month. since um o,JL,a.n.. ::.- -ffo:.t ^^ *!^° t 1990, false alarms have decreased in the City significantly. V Using 406 false alarms as the benchmark, based on the previous quarter prior to implementation, the trend in false alarms can be summarised in the following table. Month # of false alarms `k decrease Benchmark 406 n / a May 253 37.7% June 204 49.7% July 167 58.996 Au ust 125 69,29'0 It the above data is any indicator, the iaisc alarm nrdinarcc is hav(ng the desired effect of reducing false alarms. While the ordinance has been in effect, the alarm subcommittee end staff have established a policy to meet and confer wi th any party which has a concern with the ordinance or the way in which it is Acing implemented. Also, the alarm subcommittee and staff will continue to monitor false alarms and will contact Ihose sites t hat are having multiple alarm responses to work with them a ~Y False Alarm Uptlate September S, 19911 Page 3 to reduce their false alarms. The point is to reduce false alarms and the alarm subcommittee and staff arc willing to work with alarm owners to achieve this objective. Finally, some questions have been raised about multi-tenant commercial buildings. While applying the ordinance m these swctures has net yet posed any difficulty, the subcommittee will be looking into this matter m mere detail, The hope of this examination is that any potential problems with this type of structure can be anticipated and handled. Conel nsinn Because the goal of this ordinance is to reduce false alarms and not raise revenue, it appears as if the ordinance is successful. This success leads staff to the conclusion chat this ordinance should remain in place as it is without any changes at this time, However, it should be noted that the staff and the Public Safety Commissinn subcommittee will continue to monieor this program to insure its continued success. ~~ EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE N0. 409 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NElI CHAPTER 8.26 ENTITLED "SERVICE CHARGES FOR FALSE ALARMS" AND PROVIDING FOR SERVICE CHARGES TO DEFRAY THE COSTS OF FALSE POLICE ALARMS A. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Chapter 8.26 hereby is added to Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mumcrpa Code to read in words and figures, as follows: "Chanter 8.26 "SERVICE CHARGES FOR FALSE ALARMS "Sections: 8.26.010 Definitions. 8.26.020 Response service charge. 8.26.030 Bilitng. 8.26.040 Enforcement. "8.2~6_O10 Definitions. For the purposes of Yh1s Chapter, the iu iiuwiny uCllllltlYYi SOall applyapply: "(a) 'Alarm system' shall mean any device designed for the detection of an unauthorized entry on premises or for alerting others of the commission of an unlawful act, which device, when actuated, emits a sound beyond the business premises or residential unit or dwelling protected by such device or transmits a signal or message to another location. "(b) 'False alarm' shall mean an activated alaro or alarm signal from any alarm system wh1eA is responded to within the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, but for which no emergency situation ezitts or where there is no evidence to indicate that there was an emergency situation as determined by the responding officer. 'False alaro' shall not fnclude those alarms activated by extraordinary meteorological, atmospheric. or other conditions ar means as determined by So id wle riff 'i Oepiriaeni. "(c) 'Fiscal year' shall mean the period from and including July 1 of any year to and including June 30 of the following year. "(d) 'Person' shall mean any individual, partnership, corporation, or other entity. ~~lO Ordinance No. 409 ~ EXH INIT A -CONY- ~ ?age 2 1 "8.26.020 Res once service char es. A service charge which is established by resolution of the ity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to defray costs incurred in providing taw enforcement services in response Lo a false alarm shall be paid to the City, by each person who possesses premises, for each third and subsequent police response made to those premises generated by a false alarm during any fiscal year. "8.26.030 Dillino. The City's Finance Depar4aent shall cause Lo be issued a •monthly bill for the unpaid service charges accrued during the 6111 ing period and any prior periods. Such bill shall be due and payable within fifteen (15) days after the billing date. "8.26.040 Enforcement. The amount of any service charge shall be deemed a debt to the G t~( y. faction may be conanenced in the name of the City in any court of competent jurisdiction for the amount of any unpaid service charges. A11 service charges shall be deemed delinquent fifteen (16) days after they are due and payable." SECTION 2: The City Council declares Lhat, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of coapetent 3urisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, Sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall ream in in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shalt cause the same to be pubiished within fifteen (16) days after its passage at least once in The Dail R or , a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of tar o, rota, and circulated in the City of Aancho Cucaamnga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1990. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Wright NOES: None ABSENT; Brown eons tou eyor ATTEST: ra a ty er: ~' 7 7 EXHIB?T B RESOLUTI OiI N0. 90-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R1WCH0 C UC AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN SERVICE CHARGES AS DEFINED IN ORDINANCE M0. 409, CHAPTER 8.26 OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SERVICE CHARGES FDR FALSE ALARMS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did amend the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Ordinance No, 409 by adding Chapter 8,26 Service Charges for False Alarms; and WHEREAS, Municipal Ordinance No. 409, Chapter 8.26 Service Charges for False Alarms, Section 8.26.020 Response Service Charges requires certain types of service charges to be applied; and WHEREAS, current rates for said service charges have been established. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Lucaaonga does hereby resolve that service charges are established pertaining to service charges for false alarms for the City of Rancho Cucamonga for false alarms during any given fiscal year as follows: Third false alarm: S 25.00 Fourth false alarm: ~f 50.00 Fffth false alarm: f 75.00 Sixth and subsequent false alarms: =100.00 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1990. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Wright NOES: Np ne ~///~~~j~ ABSENT: Brown ``L enn s L. tout, Mayor nrrE ST: D bra da C ty erk ~74' EXHIBIT C r CITY OF IiANC110 CUCAMONGA ~`~~ 0537 "~ A'OTiCF OF POL~7CE R .cP6AicR Dale' Tlmr Dur Alarm 6yWm Owns. OINwn Mm IM R•ncho Cucamonpe Polity D•Parrm•nl rw•ntly n- apontled to s lahe earm el mia loudon. A dw& IouM M• pmm~n :o M nan. To umbetlM uMeu+aery ProbMmauuaedby INU Numa, IM Gry Ma sudw en ordnenu wNPA eueu•a • aMAU chaq• elYr tlw s•cmd INx elem. D•mM of Ibis ordinanu epgY In Mb flMr. PNax Lb e moment to nvier IM i•krmenon. FAGTB YOD 6NOUL0 N OW AEOUT cLLwE 1L NYN • Abpu 95%01 hlw Nerm+en uuad by human •rnr Ifnrp•t~ trop to chat oll IM ganm, mMinp Ihrou9h IM rrolq dwq uuannlry W ahinp tln peek bulrcn, •rc.) • In an mMN NM•. NY OI AOp Wren mla In HalrchO CUUmolq• wax Ielae .Inm. • FNx alums ilwene IIDDwaaaarY utely r1aM la Pollee ohb xrt, mOtOI1Na Ind o1R11 ciln•ne et OEiGn try b rlaponE auieblY m oenh burpYrie• in propose. • FWe .Irma un tl• up Pro pdW amxn until M• eNrm dmlrcn i. chedw em vslueW mam n.m,mw wn w....tl naoandinpnnMy+iN•nMm•rpMWa. Yore impomMNY.1M uMry PI PIMr citlxna rM mW a pdks nsponx caVY M jwpeNixd wMn p01w undo en mace VnwaW9Y by I•lu •lerma. WHAT CAN YOU DO t0 90LVE A PALKE ALAEY PRO9LEY9 1. RIV•W corm emlxtioNtluglVebOn proddufn N1111 YOVr tamlb or empmpn. Mon INU N•nna ero uuxtl by MmM •rtpr. Dlilgenu end Inininp will Nimin•b mpsl Yln alarms. - FALSE ALANY CNECKIWANNINO fiutM•aa Mru M+ponaide Perry Atldnx Dap Time37 Norm C•. 11 Known U Caux N Felu NMn Type OI Almm ~ AudIWLJ 9iNnlU Canm•mu1Q P•NMntlsQ IMUSWeQ Olllcer Empbyx FROA~T~ x. Inanll [n11ebIA Wren ayuOmenl Mtl mpa u0a Mnr it is Orennrly taOticW.m mAYlAioN6 ]. VIAm. Isla Norm Doan NQW 1NE F1L6E ALAF A lelu alum la aonaideted M ubvued Wren or Num agnN whicA is nspMdW n rith n tln Ciry of RYrcM CunmMpa by Polix Olflan, bul for rhkh no •m• ~pency seupen esiab as demrmimd by IM nspslld• irp aflker. A lelu alarm Map wl Include Ihox WMa wlinled by nlnorGnaW mslwdopkY, eMnapMdc, or oNer condidom or m•Ma x MYMM•dbybY Rerwho CuWwnW FWiP• MpermYnl. Alw, eMma wllhin Na Enl I9 lry+Ol InaxNe9on d e 11x1 alum syNem, upon Prwl x tlm Pde+Depetmenlol aueb gaWepM, shell wl M mnsidY•d I•lu alarms. OnNS Mird IWS aAU mwnu l0 • parpadu loutlon dudnp m• Haul pu, • xrvee nn+me ahaN M peld n ms Clry m blraY tM wsb of mpoMblp n MW Nu Norm. TM xrdu dlarpe Nall M band on m• foll9wirp acMduY lhed FNUAIUm ...............9x9.00 FaurMFNnAleml ................ W.00 F~Im FNx Norm - yD 00 Sato FNx Narm ..............t0o.00 6rba•R9M1 FNn AI•Ma...tOp.Oo Hmrlw Cuemwrga odes DspNlnMl loslo cm. c•mer Drly ILnclm CucemMpa. CA 91 )]D TlA-999-8911 Clry PI RMdw Cuamonpa city WmxrY Olfics 10309 Clvic CMnr Otlvs Random Cuumonpe, DA 91)30 ]1A-999-1951 C &A~K~ a ~~ EXHIBIT D C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- tosaa rma cma. Drava, Post omn eaa m~ me 9e9~tas1 Poncho Cunmonra, UlilorNa 91TA Fu (na) 9B1d199 August 20, 1990 Uear Alarm System Owner: As you era probably aware, officers from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department have, on two occasions this year, responded to Pniee burglar alarms At your location. False alums criaate unneceeeary safety rielu to police offlcsre, motorists and other citizens and tie up valuable police resources. Your asaiatmce is needed to help reduce Tales alaxma in the City and to ovoid paying service charges for felea alarm responses. Ta combat the serious problms caused by false alarms, the City 6se enacted an ordinance which aseeaees a service chugs on the third false alarm in a given year. Hawed on the proviaiona oP thin ordinanro, should the ponce have Co respond to a fal.aa alarm at this location again during this liacal yeu, you will be queued a service charge to help the city defray tM cost of reepoMing M th{w fwlww wl arm. Tn now month el ono. doh of l09 wlarm nwllw wrw fntao. Most false alone problems are caused Dy )Jy®gp ~'~, sad review of alarm procodutee with members of your family or amployua can help eliminate moat false alarms. It ie ~.ohly rscollmended that you make sure that your slarm equipment is properly serviced and maintained, end remapber to report problems !»mediately to your alarm company eo that they may ba corrected. !else alarms ue unneceeeary and can be prevented, and your hQp is appreciated. If you have any gl;eetions regarding the Clty'e false nlerm ordinance, please do not hesitate to contact the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department at 989-6611, or the Ciiy Manayet'n Offics nt 989-1851. Thank you for your nseistance and cooperation in making Aancho Cucemongn a safer place to live, work and play. DAB\tlt DABa301 2-~v Coeo,nn.rme,n .weae. William J. Alexander Charles I augeet II Gn.N.n•rc~ Dennis L. Sbm tkMrah V. atown Pamela J \VriPht Jack Lam. AICP "- ¢ EXHIBIT c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pas[ JILa Bor BM, 9.ncho Cucamonga, CaL(amu 9189, 0141 999-1851 May 24, 1990 Branc:4 Manager Pomona First Federal Savings and Loan 6444 Carnelian Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Branch Manager: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has recently taken action to minimize problems caused by false alarms. A recently enacted ordinance establishes service charges Por the third (and subsequent) false alarm responses during any given fiscal year (July 1 - June 30). The purpose of this latter is to solicit your cooperation and assistance. False alarms are an unnecessary drain on police resources which can be better utilized responding to bona £ide emergencies. Additionally, responding to alarm calls are inherently dangerous to officers and other motorists alike in the course of trying to respond in a timely manner. As you know, alarm systems in banks and okhar financial institutions are designed to alert police to robberies in progress. During April, 1990, there were 29 false hold-up alarms, 11 of which were from financial institutions. A minimum of two, and as often as many as six police officers respond to such bank hold-up alarms. Aside from the unnecessary waste of manpower, the attendant unnecessary risks posed to officers, your employees, your customers and the general public make this problem a serious matter when the cause of the alarm is accidental. Obviously, the City does not want to discourage your employees from using the system when they actually Head a police officer. Unfortunately, moat false alarms are caused by human error, (accidentally trinpinq the switch ar removing bait money, etc.) a...d not because a police officer was actually being summoned. we strongly urge you to contact a qualified professional burglar alarm consultant to determine if your facility is equipped with "accident proof" switches, buttons and pedals. Enclosed era some paints you might consider to help prevent false alarms. These points include new triggering devices and training for employees to minimize false hold-up alarm calla. co..rit.,memr ~~+Y^• WIIIiam I. Aleaa nder Chariea I~ Buquet II Gr wv Dennis L. Stoat Deborah N. Brown l ~ n• Pamela ). Wright Jack Lam, AICP 1~ ~/ ~ / ~ ~ EXHIBIT E -CON~- Pomona First Federal Savings and Loan May 24, 1990 Page 2 With your assistance, we can minimize the number of false robbery alarms. should you have any questions regarding the City~s alarm ordinance (a copy of which is enclosed), please do not hesitate to call me at (714) 989-1851. Thank you for helping to make Rancho Cucamonga a safer place in which to live and work. Sincerely, Duane A. Baker Senior Administrative Assistant DAB:tlr DAB\258 ...-.Gave ua ao ~~a EXHIBIT F Improving Police Services You Can Help In a typical month, false alarms in Rancho Cucamonga accounted for approximately 203 hours of police time. Tl»s is time that could be spent patrolling the streets, catching crirrrinals and preventing aime. The time spent on false alarms represents five full time officers. For this reason, the City enacted a False Alarm Ordinance. This ordinance estab- lishesservice charges to be levied on the third and subsequent false alarm responses that take place during the year. You can help reduce the number of false alarms and improve police services in the community. Some points to consider regarding your alarm system: ^ About 65% of all false alarms are caused by human error. r1 T- _ ..... ,. :.. :. .: u.: jou.- . :P:vjC v v.-. a. a n~i.roi.vui deactivation procedures. Dilligence and ,training can prevent most false alarms. ^ Install reliable alarm equipment, and make sure that it is properly seviced and maintained. ^ Test your equipment at each point of protection at least once a month. ^ Report loose or questionable connections and wires to your alarm company immediately. ^ have a complete test of your entire system performed at least once a year. To get more information about the Cit}~s alarm ordinance call the Rancho Cucamonga Police Depaztment at 989-6611 or the City Managet's Office at 989-1851. a~~ EXIiIBTT G FOR SNMEDIATE IiEI.F.ASE CONTACT: Duane A. Baker, Senior .adminietrat ive AeeietanC (714) 989-1E51r extenainn 208 nATt: March 22, 1990 SOEdECT: FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE TARES EFFECT Beginning May 1, 1990, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Rave in place a False Alarm Ordinance. What this means i.a that service charges will 6e billed to those requiring three or more false alarn rseponeee during a year. During one month in Rancho Cucamonc a, the SherltY'e Department responded to 409 burglar alarms. Of these 409 alante, 406 were false alarms. When presented with this etaggeri.ig statistic, the Public Safety Commiaeicn zegvested that a False Alarm Ordinance be dratted. The purpose of the ordinance is to rode ce t.`.a number cf false aiarme experienced in the Crty by Raving people with chronic false alarm problems d~ofray the coat of responding to those calla. The ordinance. ae it waw txrwr wd~.rod ,~ :«a so,vi _ _ _ _.._ __ ___;~_~, defines what a false alarm ie and e9tabliehee that after two false alarms in a given year, service charges will bei)in to be levied. A9 defined in the ordinance, a false• alarm ie considered an activated alarm cr alarm signal which is responded to within the City of Aancho Cucamonga by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Depac tment, but for which no emergency situation ex isle as determined by the :eapondirg of titer. A false alarm shall not include those alarms act Svatetl by extraordir ary meteorological, atmospheric, or other conditions or means ae determined by the Sheriff's Department. After Che third £a lee alarm response to a particular location during a tiecal year, a service Charge shall ba paid to the City to defray the coats of responding to Che false alarm. The service charge is bated cn the Following schedule: Thirtl False Alarm $26 e OLL rtll pwiww A13r!~ $SC Fifth False Alarm $76 Sixth and Subaequem: False Alarms $100 Ae the City preParee to initiate the Fe:.ee Alarm Ordinance, those people who have alarm systems should keep in mind that approximately 66~ of all false alarms ere caused 6y human error (forgetting to shut off the system, entering through the wrong door, accidentally pu ahing the panic button() and thaC tales alarms increase unnecessary safety riake to police offlcere, motorists and at her ~~ 1 EXHIBIT G -CONT- citizens ne officers try to respond to catch burglaries in progress. And, finally, false alnrme can tie up valuable police resources and could jeopardize the safety of other eitizena who need a police rssponna when unite era unavailable because of false alarms. False alarms can b0 prevented, and the City of Rancho rucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Statlon need your help. Review your alarm activation end deactivation procedures with your families or employees. Remember that moat false alarms are caused by human error, and diligence and training will elLOinate these problems. Install reliable alarm equipment and make aura that it ie prcperly serviced and maintained. Pinally, when a false alarm dose occur, identify and correct the cause immediately. liorking together, we can solve the unnecessary drain on resources cauaetl by false alarms and improve the overall quality of public safety in our community. Questions regarding the new False Alarm Ordinance can be directed to the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station at 969-6:.11 or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, city Manager's Gff ice, at 969-1651. DAH: ked D\133 x}85' EXHIBIT H /~°'CL"".r~"g"`~,~.~t ~~ /7 g0 PROGRAM OF SERVICE / City Council Adopts 1990-91 and 1991-92 Balanced Budgets Tmo-year budget totals $1T6.7 million At a pub& hearing on June 14, the City Council adopted Rancho Cucamonga's feral 1930.91 and fisca11991-92 budgets. This two-year budget allows for expen- ditures and reserve commitments totalling $116,746,000. The first year's budget is §64,020,000 and the 1991-92 budget is $52,726,000. The City's Program of Service strives to provide the community with the highest, mast cost- effe<tive and efficient level of public service wen the a,•auabie resources, In fiscal year 7990-91 a cooperative effort of the City and certain school disMas will fund a D.A.R.E. officer for dmg prevention training in the schools. taw enforcement services rim proposed to be enhanced even further by the addition of a new patrol unit in 1991-92. Assisting the work of the police in fighting gangs and vandals, the City wW be enhancing ds graffiti removal program to include railroad rights-vi-way in our graffiti removal efforts. While the City's budgets may seem large, they actually are a reduction from expected revenues and provide an opportunity for the City to be aeadve in stretching the available dollars. Initiation of an organized volunteer program will Ire one way to help stretch dollars. There are many people who would like to volunteer some of their time in helping their city serve [he public and improve the community, and a volunteer program will make the most of this valuable resource. Another method the City is using to stretch dollars is to self-insure (or auto insvranm. FuwBy, the City will enhance its ability to maintain its own vehicles to help reduce costs associated with "marked-up" parts and labor paid to private vendors. Animal control services, ar.: antsy provided thrcugh a contract with [he county, will be provided by the City beginning in fiscal year 7991-92. The current budget includes funds to constmm a City animal care facility that will house the City~s own animal conhol program. The City's new budges also includes funds for a continued emphasis on park development, street maintenance and constmction, new traffic signals, ^ood control, and community beautification. Included as part of the many community improvement projects during the next two years are the construchor of storm drains in Haven and Church streets, construction of a grade separation at Milliken and the AT & SF Railroad, widening of Frwthill at the SP Railroad underpass, rehabilitation and widening of Haven from 4th to Foothill, reconstruction of Church St. from Archibald to Haven, 18 new traffic signals throughout the City, and improvements to the Foothill/1-15 interchange, As always, the City Council welcomes your input on the cur: aril Program of Service, as well as suggestions for future Programs. j~MlIMCIPAL CODE UPDATE False Alarm Ordinance Preventing false alarms During a recent month in Rancho .. :Y~ .. :esponded to 4U9 burglar alarms~~'Of these 409 alarms. 406 were false alarms. To help alleviate [his problem the City of Rancho Cucamonga has Implemented a False Alarm Ordinanrn. What this means to businesses and residents of t're community is that service charges will be billed tc those residents/businesses having three or more false alarm responses during a year. When presented with this staggering statistic, the Public Safety Commission requested Inat a False Alann Ordinance be dmked. The purpose of the ordinance is to reduce the number of false alarms enJrrirnced in the Ciiv by iwvinv rxvvie with chronic false aUrm problems dehay the cost of responding to those calls. The ordinance, as it was later adapted in its final form by the City Council, defines what a false alarm is and establishes that after two false alarms in a given year, service charges wiR begin to be levied. As defined in the ordinance, a false alarm is considered to be an activated (~ alarm or alarm signal which is responded to within the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the Potirn Department, but for whim no emergency aftuation exists as determined by the responding officer. A false alarm shall not include those alarms logical, atmospheric, or other conditions or means as determined by the Police Department. On the third false alarm :espouse to a particular location during a fiscal year, a service charge shall be paid to the City to defray the costs of responding to the false alarm. The service charge is based on the following schedule: Third False Alann 5 25,Op Fourth False Alarm § SO.IXI Fifth False Alarm § 7$.00 Sixth and Subsequent False Alarms §100.00 individuaicihuanxcac wnr+bava aurm systems should keep in mind that approximately 65% of all false alarms are caused by human error (forgetting to shut off the system; entering through the wrong door, accidentally pushing the panic button, etc,) and that false alarms increase unnecessary safety risks to police officers, motorists and other citizens as officers try to respond to catch burglaries in progress. And, finally, false alarms can tie up valuable police resources and could jeopanlize the safety of other citizens who need n polite response when units are unavailable because of false alarms. False alanm can be prevented, and the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department need your help. Review your alarm activation and deactivation procedures with your families or employees. Remember that most false alarms are caused ty human error, and diligence and training will eliminate these problems. Install reliable alarm equipment and make sure that it is properly serviced and maintained. Finally, if a salsa alarm does occur, identify and correct the cause immediately. Working together, we can solve the necessary drain on resourms caused by iaica aiarmc and , o r6o_ ~ .on quality of publicf safety in lour community. Questions regarding the new False Alarm Ordinance can be directed to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department at 989-6611 or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Manager's Office at 989-1g5t. ^ In order fo prourde residents of Rancho Cucamonga with information an new ardinanarand rcsoulfions, suhsequrnt iuues of The Gmprvine will rontain annotations similar to this one on the new False Alarm Ordimnce EXHIBIT I FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT buaneA.Baker, Senior Administrative Assistant (?l1) 989•SS51. extension 2006 DATE: June lg. 1990 SUBJEf,T. FALSE ALARM ORDIHARCE FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE TO BE ENFORCED During ooe month in Rancho Cucamonga, the Police Department responded to 109 burglar alarms of which 406 were false. The average number of false alarms a month is Rancho Cucamonga was in excess of 100. Whoa presented with this staggering stazislic. the City's Public Safely Commission requested that a. False Alarm Ordinance be drafted. "The siWatian was intolerable;' staled Clyde A. Boyd. Public Safety commission Chairmaa The ordtnance, as a vas ieic~ oJ~ "' `° '~: r"^M'!^_^~~ oc'ahlishes service y,.,...~ charges which are levied on the third and subsequent false alarms during the fiscal year Beginning July 1.1990. the service chazges outlined by the ordinance will begin to be levied. While this ordinance has been in effect since May I, I99U, the service charges have not been levied during the first two months of the ardinaace in order to inform and educate and obtain the public's cooperation. Every time an officer responds to a false alarm, a door hangar is left iaforaing the alarm awaer that they have had a false alarm which required a police response and explaining the problems false alarms pose the city a9 well as the terms of the ordinance and service charges, Additional efforts to inform the public have bees made as well. press releases on the ordinances inception in May. informational fliers in all public \ ~ -more- d~ EXHIBIT f -CONT- PAGETWO -FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE TO BE ENFORCED buildings, and special letters to all banks and financial instiWtions in [he city the Chamber of Commerce is also cooperuing with the City is publicizing the false alarm problem The purpose of the ordinance is to reduce the number of false alarms and not to raise revenue For this reason the City is mating a maximum effort w inform the puh!it ~I the or diaanw before service charges begin to be levied on July 1. 1990 the service charges for false alarms are SZS for the third response. S50 for the fourth response S75 for We fifth response. and 5100 for the sixth and subsequent response .41arms caused by exvaordinary conditions such az svong winds or elecvical storms shall not be counted az false alarms Also, a grace period is being given after the installation of ae alarm rystem W allow for the bugs to be worked out of the system Approximately 65'. of all false alarms are caused by human error such as entering through the wrong door. forgetling to shut off the system. or aaidentally pushiaR Panic buttons Most false alarms can be prevented through training and the use of reliable alarm equipment ~pw. Low we uoviuus utatn on pot[ce servues. false alarms also increase sa(e[y risks to police officers. motorists and other citizens az officers try [o promptly respond to alarms in progress Hazardous situations can also be created when response limes to legitimate emergencies are increased becaux available officers are bury investigating a false alarm Questions regarding the False Alarm Ordinance can be directed to Sgt Virgil Merrell of the Rancho Cucamonga Police at 989-6611 or Iluane Baker of the Cily Manager s Uf floe at 989-1851. :.• ~~ Cryaaigqng wolf c _ullegn Staff WryteC~a~zS~9o Crying wolf Loo many times can tort Rancho Cucamonga residents money. 3erviee charges will be levied against [bird and subsequent Calee burglar Ordinance EXHIBIT J sn get expensive for folks eBlarmra~mbegtmiag JuIY i, card Duane es deputies respond to alarms is •.~ purpoaee~ ~ a~m~ ~ progress, Bskar esid 'educe the number of false al '~0' legitimate emergencies mutt not to raise roveam; he seid.~s~ a~ wait while aMeero iavertigate false Felee alarms increase sale risks to elertns, he said. police oRlttrs, motorists andd residents O~ron will not be ae quick m rn See ORDWAIVCFJB3 /from B1 ;~=s/a~ .a an alarm :W thay':re goue to e location a number of Times beauee of [else elarme, Baker ee!d. "They're only 6umro," he acid. "We're trying m ovoid the 'boy who cried wolf syndrome' and give We best service possible." The service charge after [he third faL~e alarm in S2b. Alter the fourth it's sizes sad ettbantuaat taspoaau itu 5100 each all. Although the alarm ordinance wee adopted by the City Cauacii on May 1, billing hm been delayed is order m prevt ample tlme m inform the pub Preen rokeaes, iafotautional then end epecid letters have publicized the felee s!nrm problem. 6e said. Also. every tome ea ofBeer hu tmponded m ^ [else alarm, • flier is IeR informing the alarm owner that they haw bad ^ false alarm which roauixed n polka reamer and ezplainiag [hp problems hlr alarms por. About 86 peraat of all false elarme are aueed by human error, each r entering through the wrong door, Can gaeent!t to shut oft the ayttem or so:i- dentallY Pushing psn!c 6uttont, Haker said. _ / - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT" DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: grad guile.^, Cify planner BY: Anthea Hartig, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIOE P.ATION OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 90-02 - THE RED CHIEF MOTEL AND CAFE. LOCATED AT 8270 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - A proposal to consider an application to deny a Landmark Designation for the Red Chief Motel and Cafe. Historic Preservation Commission also requests a policy direction rega rdin9 a potential Landmark Designation for the Bear Gulch area which would include the Sycamore inn, the signf ficant trees, the Oso Bear statue and potential archaeological resources (the site of the proposed Sycamore Village project) but ezclued the Red Chief Motel and Cafe - APN: 207-101-17. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Comm155i on recommends that the City Cou ncfl deny the application Far Landmark Designation 90-02 for the Red Chf of Motel and Cafe. The Commission further recommends that Cw~w .. woo ivm iniLiaciny an appi ica Lion ror a mstonc Poi rtt of Interest or Local Landmark designation for the subject portion of the Bear Gulch area, ezcepting the Red Chief Motel and Cafe structures, which comprises the area of tha proposed Sycamore Village site. BACKGROUND: The Red Chief Note~~ and Cafe, as the structures were originally known, came to the Historic Preservation Commission's attention because the owner, Arroyo de Los Osos Partnership, submitted plans for the Sycamore V711age Droject which Called for the Red Chief's demolition. The proposed project f clod es the utll ization and retention of the Statue of Oso Bear, a design. led Local Landmark, and the Sycamore Inn, a designated Point of Interest. The site as a whole, however, represents potentially the most significant continuum of Rancho Cucamonga's history; far what is known as the Bear Gulch area has been the nexus of travel and tra nsDO rta ti on throuaheut the Native American, Spani ,and A~aerican period3. As a result of this continued activity, the site is potentially rich in archaeological resources according to San Bernardino County officials. ~~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LA 90-02 - RED CHIEF MOTEL E CAFE September 5, 1990 Page 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: At the duly 5, 1990 meeting, the Commission moved to determine Landmark Designation at its next meeting after hearing staff's initial findings regarding the historic significance of the Red Chief complex. Concerted owner objection as manifested at the August 2 meeting carried into effect the Commission's policy on landmark designation over such objection (see Exhibit "A"). The Commission then voted not to confer a Landmark Designation on the Red Chief Motel and Cafe (on a 4 to 3 vote), but to request the Council's direction on broadening the scope of potential designation to include the north Bear Gulch area -- the proposed Sycamore Pillage site. Res 1.V s ed ~, ra B City anne BB :AH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Historic Preservation Commission's policy on owner consent Exhibit "B" - Staff Repor4 dated August 2, 1990 Ex hf bit "C" - Minutes from August 2, 1990 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting P~~ -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 21, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: I. II HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION POLICY iiHEN CONSIDERING A RECOMiENDATION FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION RECOMIENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review the po iry o e istoric Preservation Commission and send changes, if any, back to the Comai ssion. BACKGROUND: On October 6, 1988, the Historic Preservation omm ss on formed the fallowing policy on when to retoaaFend designation of a landmark over an owner's objection to designation. The Coswlssion approved guidelines that would be reasonable and effective on balancing the concerns of owners with the City's desire to protect historic properties. On November 3, 1988, the wording of the policy was further refined by the Historic Preservation Coawission. ui, ruu~r: ine poncy is as roiiows: It is the policy of the Historic Preservation Coawission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to override the objection of an owner in recomaending landmark designation when: A. The property Ts on the City's historical inventory, and B. The property stands out as having outstanding historical, architectural, cultural or aesthetic significance, and C. Designation could help to protect 1t. IV. ANALYSIS: The policy attempts to limit itself to outstanding propar_ as that have been previously identified and which conceivably can be protected by designation. If it is virtually a foregone conclusion that the property will be destroyed by development, then then is no point W recoammnding designation. If the property is a goad but not outstanding example of a certain style, has an ordinary historical background, and has no distinctive beauty or cultural associations, then the Commission /~- EXN~/jir f~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ONNER CONSENT Depember 21, 1988 Page 2 will not recommend it for designation if the owner objects, tt must be especially notable for its architecture, history, aesthetic qualfties, or its cultural background. In addition, the Historic Preservation Caaaission has directed staff to define "outstanding" more precisely. The Commission will continue to recommend landmark designation of both outstanding and more ordinary Dut worthy properties where the owner does not obiect, as iang as the properties meet the criteria established 1n the HTStorlc Preservation Ordinance Section 2.24.090. Res ully tte Br e City anner 88:A8:mlg Attachaents: Memorandui October 6, 1988 Memorandum Senbwb~r 1, 14PR NPC Minutes November 3, 1988 HPC Minutes October 6, 1988 NPC Minutes September 1, 1988 X93 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OATS: August 2, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation commission FROM: Larry J. Henderson, Principal Planner BY: An th ea Ha rt ig, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION 90-02 - THE RED CHIEF MOTEL AND CAFE - A proposal to consider an application to designate the Red Chief Motel and Cafe, located at 8210 Foothill Boulevard, as an Historic Landmark - APN: 207-101-17. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The Red Chief Motel and Cafe are located on the north side of foothill Boulevard, slightly west of its intersection with San Bernardino Road in an area known as Bear Gulch. A rectangular lot 2.89 acres in size, the slightly sloped area forms a portion of the base of Red Nill. For this report, the 'site' is the land on which the structures stand. B. Site Land Dse. Zonino and Foothill Specific Ptan: Site - The site of the restaurant and motel structures contain rich and aged landscapfng which includes Sycamore trees and cacti arranged around the asphalt paved parking area. Zoning/Foothill Specific Plan - The Foothill Specific Plan designated the Bear 6ulth area, Subarea 1, a Special Commercial (S.C.) Zone. This zoning strongly encourages hfgh- quality community and pedestrian orientated activfty areas and an lncorporatien of the City's cultural heritage into any future development. The areas to the southeast and west of the site are also zoned S.C. and directly to the south; a Lomnunity Commercial (C.C.) designation has been given. The acknowledgement of the historic merit of Route 66 (per City Council Resolution No. 90.195, see attached) also plays a role in the determination of this site's significance. ~~~ Ex h'. b','F HPC STAFF REPORT RED CHIEF MOTEL d ~E - ARROYO DES LOS OSOS PARTN~ ~1IP August 2, 1990 Page 2 C. Architectural Desc riotion: The structures are wooden framed and trimmed, stucco-covered, single-storied and have red ti le roofs of alternating flat and gable lines. The structures are examples of modest, yet creative, Spanish Revival (Mission) design. The cafe's site orientation parallels Foothill Boulevard and has undergone a series of remod elings, including the removal of the the roof. The two parallel rows of motel rooms and garages, each originally consisting of four duplexes and row of eiyht attache6 units, have retained most of their original ez ter for integrity. The motel's fenestration pattern facade is a repeated pair of 3 foot by 6 foot one-over-one, double-hung sashed windows. An apparently original 61ock and stucce wall approximately 6 feet in height connects the east and west motel rows. Of particular architectural merit are Lhe doorway, window, and roof treatments and the integration of the garages into the overall design. The so17d wood doors of ail sixteen structures remain: they are painted dark Drown and have a chevron pattern approximately 3/8 inch wide carved into the door with about 1 foot between pattern repeat. The doors' steel hardware -- latches, viewing boxes (peep holes), hinges -- appear, from all ova liable accounts, original and are of a highly decorative Spanish Revival type. Two styles of wooden decorative pediments alternatingly aDPear over each doorway providing further links to the Revival style of the structures. The window treatment of permanently open shutters repeats along the facades of each Ming; the shutters are composed of two long, unconnected planks 9oined by two horizontal planks laid across the two vertical members approximately 5 inches from the top and bottom of each shutter. The garages form a crlt lcal part of the motels' design and function, each unit has an ad~ac ent garage which is structurally contiguous with the motel rooms. Swingfng doors with a curved top profile which exists only on the first unit of the west row perhaps narked the original entrance to the garages. The garage entrances are now covered by a mare modern wooden, flat. spring-released doors. Other specific and existing exterior design elements include a pedimented doorway and gate along the north side of the perimeter wall, and what were most likely utility sheds, albeit decoratively housed, attached to the south wall of the west row of motel units. ~5S HPC STAFF REPORT RED CHIEF MOTEL 8 .E - ARROYO DES LOS OSOS PARTN~ dIP August 2, 1990 Page 3 Each unit has two rooms, 12 feet by 17 feet 6 inches and 10 feet by 9 feet, 6 inches; a clothes closet: and a bathroom with a built-in shower. Likewise, the interiors of the motel rooms have been greatly altered from their original appearance. It appears, however, that some of the original shower tiles and bathroom lighting fixtures may be original and that the walls were paint on stucco and the floors exposed hardwood. The Interior fabric of the cafe has undergone seemingly many alterations, as it housed both residential and restaurant uses. Any original materials have not yet been located. Painted wooden panels depicting an interpretation of Native American life datfng from the early 1950s now are housed at the Upland t~seum. II. ANALYSIS: A. Bac kvround: The Red Chief Motel and La fe, as the structures are commonly and historically known, came to our attention because the owner, Arroyo des los Osos Partnership, submitted plans to demolfsh the property in order to make way for the proposed Sycaxare Village. At the July 5, 1990 meetf ng, staff presented initial findings regarding the historic significance of the Red Chief Complex. The Comni ssion moved to determine landmark designation during the August 2, 1990 meeting. O. Sivnific ante: Historical - Throughout the Native American, Spanish, and American phases of Rancho Cucamonga's past, the Bear Gulch area has always ffgured prominently. The area is potentially rich in archaeological significance, according to San Bernardino County offtctais (see also the Owner's Archaeological Report, Exhibit "F'). The site suDDlSed the arena for the attempted lynching of Dona Merced, infcrmatfon and produce exchanges, aril the local stop for the Butterfield Stage. The citrus growing Industry fueled an economic and cultural boom in the Cucamonga area which grew in the 1930's despite the Depression. The Santa Fe Railroad and later Route 66 channeled visitors from across the continent into the Arroyo des los Osos area and the Red Chief Cafe. In 1936, John E, and Martha James built the Red Chief Motel and Cafe on land the couple purtrased from the San Antonio Mater Company the preceding year. An article the following Year that appeared in The Upland News heralded the ~ted Chief as "perhaps the best auto court in the country.' Lucy aM John's Restaurant (the Megic Lamp site) and the Sycamore Inn were also there to provide diming and accommodations for travelers and local citizens alike. ~ 9.~ HPC STAFF REPORT RED CHIEF MOTEL d FE - ARROYO DES LOS OSOS PARTN dIP August 2, 1990 Page 4 Architectural - The design of the cafe and motel provide a tangible link between the heightened automobile travel of the 1930's-1950's, the embracing of Southern California's Spanish colonial legacy, and the popularity and importance of Route 66. The carefully integrated garages, the roofs, wooden and steel decorative elements, and the native landscape combine to create an environment truly indicative of its time. issues - The Arroyo des los Osos Partnership has submitted plans for this site and the adjacent Sycamore lnn site which show the demolition of the Red Chief Motel and Cafe. Rehab Specialist Carlos Silva accompanied staff on June 29, 1990, and determined that the original framing of the motel row was not poorly built and is a full "two-by" construction. Mr. Silva also noted that there was no immediately noticeable water damage from faulty roofs; that electr is sl rewiring would be necessary if the buildings were to pass inspection; and that the site was in need of work, but in relatively good shape structurally. The Commission raised the following concerns and suggestions during the July 6, 1990 meeting. 1. Every effort should be made to preserve the site's wealth in terms of historic vegetation, in particular. the existing Sycamore trees. The need for a soec ific adaotfve reuse ma rketinq study in order to better determine the structure' Dotential for economic return. The improvement on this lot rose from 5500 to 56,400 between 1936 and 1931 ind ica ttng that the structures were constructed during this time; at no other time in the 1430s or 1940s does this quick a jump occur. See Street Survey and Tax Record, Exhibit "B". June, 1937. Research gratefully completed by Melic ent Arner. The May 1, 1936 front page of Th U 1 Ne s reported that in fact thz James sold the Red Chief to Noyt Mi ton, a local real estate investor who also owned the Sycamore inn at that time as well as the Hotel Ontario. The article detailed that Milton had plans to turn the Sycamore Inn into "an outstanding recreational center." The Assessor's records from this time indicate, however, that the James' pa fd taxes on the property, and according to the above article, managed the hotel. X97 HPC STAFF REPORT RED CHIEF MOTEL d -F. - ARROYO DES LOS OSOS PARTNE ,IP August 2, 1990 Page 5 ACTION: Staff is investigating firms which specialize in adaptive re-use studies. 3. The possibility of the Redevelopment Agency funding such an adaptive re-use study. ACTION: Staff is waiting for the Deputy City Manager to respond to this proposal. 4. The existing "village-like" scale and feel of the Red Chief complex could lend itself tc smaller, commercial venues geared toward ambulating and browsing. Such a use in historic strut tares would confo nn to the Foothill Specific Plan's call for pedestrian scaled commercial areas which embrace the City's cultural heritage. In terms of the ramifications of a Landmark Designation, the following explanation of eond iti ons drawn from City Ordinance 2.24,110-E and 2.24.120-G (attached for reference) is put forth. 1. If the historic property's owner requests any change of use or material change to a Landmark, a Special Use Permit or a Landmark Alteration Permit, respectively, must be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council. 2. Physical changes that the owner may request through a Landmark Alteration Permit include demolition, building, and grading. 3. In order to approve a Landmark Alteration Permit, the Commission must find that the proposed action meets one of the following conditions: a. It preserves the historic integrity of the Landmark; D. It Ts necessary to correct an "unsafe or dangerous" element of the Landmark; or a Especially fn the case of significant alteration or demolition, it prevents th¢ Landmark's owner from incurring "immediate or substantial hardship." I[I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: in accordance with Historic Preservation rdfnanc~ection 2.2.24.090, the following paints of significance appear to pertain to the Red Chief Motet and Cafe: U HPC STAFF REPORT RED CNIEF MOTELS .FE - ARROYO DES LOS OSOS PARTN~...,HIP August 2, 1990 Page 6 The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, or way of life. The proposed landmark is of greater age Phan most of its kind. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common, but is now rare. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, and City. IV. RECOMMENDAT iON: .The staff asserts that with the renewed interest in Route 66, the City's Foothill Specific Plan, and the scarcity of motel/cafe complexes such as the Red Chief, the structures and site be given a potential local landmark identification on the Hfsto rical Building Survey. R~especjt/-f/u'l~ly submitted, Larry-J. Henderson Principal Planner BB:LJH/,jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "0" Exhibit "E" Exhfbft "F" Resolution Resolutfon N0. 90.195 Street Survey and Property Tax Record Historical Preservation Ordinance 2.24.110-120. Photographs Historical Building Survey Archaeologtcat Report ~-9 9 RESOLUTION N0. 90-195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE MOVEMENT TO PRESERVE THE UNITED STATES ROUTE 66 HIGHWAY AS AN HI STORIL H[GNWAY WHEREAS, the United States Route 66, a 2,000 mile highway from Chicago, it lino is, Lo Santa Monica, California, has played a ma,lor role in the 20th Century history of our country; end, WHEREAS, Route 66 has become a symbol of the American peoples' heritage of travel and their legacy of seeking a better 1Sfe; and, WHEREAS, Route 66 served as a funnel for the 20th Century migration from the Dust Bowl of the central states; and, WHEREAS, during the early 1980's, structures and features along Rate 66 began to disappear, an historical loss to the nation; aM, WHEREAS, the City of Pancho Cucamnga adopted the Foothill Balevard SDecific Plan which was spaiftcally designed to acknowiedge and proeote the preservation of historic firatures of Foothill Balerard, also kndwn as Rate 66; and, WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucaapnga Historic Preservation Commission recommended by resaluiton on April 5, 1990 to the Lity Council the preservation of Rate 66 as an historic hlghwey. "..^.'~, T;[n,:rGni, ii,e Lily Cuuncii or the City of zancno Uutamonga does hereby resolve and encarages the comeirmoration of Route 66 as a nationally significant highway that was ane of the longest aM earliest transcontinental roadways 5n America and that Ww to 66 be preserved as an historic highway. PASSED, gPPR0YE0, aM ADOPTED this 16th day of NIy, 1990. AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout NOES: Noie ABSENT: Night nn s tout, iYyor ~~~ Re so lu:ion rvo. ?D-:35 Page 2 ATTEST: De ra J. A ms, City C erk 1, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Lali fa rn ia, da hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, aoproved, and adopted by *_he City au.ri] of •he 'ity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of May, 1990. Executed this 17th day of May, 1990 at Rancho Cucaa•~nga, California. bra ems, C ty er ~6/ ~sif ~liFi' ~~C~ I '1TR~cT tiffRVF_l' FDBM Al.Uf<L:;S -~> ili ~ ~.~b/f 1-GO1Fl/LL SECTI ON____~ `_. TF NO NUMBER CLOSEST NUMBERS ON EITHER SIDE` OE STREET lMOUNTAI NS AP.F. TO TBE NORTBj f/GNi~ NEAREST CROSS STREETS C'~~~ E TYPE OF STRUCTURE(S), OB.IECT(S) (GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION) zaaNfsu Fn~.FA)/Q ~N,/;7£L~('-/Fns l43•~iF` ~;~'/{A~ I+~J,EFn 7/•Lf ROCS T/E~ ?J ~YnAmQ~ /Nti~ _~c~1lLUE/J>E,O ,U J/Y/ALL ~1.f//./Es5 SairES /1CT.I ~~. ~~~. V4~113~ OI6tiEY, JF P.D.'?E:.':;_02/9 ~0• ~K-~ "."oG/[.R 7~` G"CL.T C7J"1:v LEGI~... I7SCRI PTION (IF AVAILAELE n~ ?rc ~erty Address;'_~~~_ ,~_;-l' ~ ____ -_ ___-_~__ Original Poor Quaucy_. e Jxner as 1lsted :nnro Vines Acres 3'sf?3 a ~ i tea,. .J~;, ~1~~-i -'' ,<< ~a i »_ _ ~. C/tr S .~ / / ~, p u :( 4 K CAt~( ~ U# CC ECG _ ~a 4 ,~ - ,. i r ]k.' 72 ..~ dn' ' E~ __~ ~~ Exerpted from: The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance 2.24.110 Landmark change of use procedure--Special use permit reQUirements. E. Prior to approval or modified approval, the historic preservation commission shalt find that: 1. The action proposed is consistent with the purposes of this chapter; 2. The use proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aeithetlc, cultural, architectural or engineering interest or value of an historic nature; or, 3. The applicant hat demonstrated that deniai of the application will result in immediate and substantial hardship. _2._24.120 Landmark alteratlon~rocedure--Permit repulrements. G. Prior to approval or mod/fled approval, the hl5tortc preservation casnisslon shall find tMt: 1. The action proposed is consistenT: with the purposes of this ordinance; and 2. The action proposed wilt not be M!tr/mental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic nature: or 3. The action proposed 1s necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition on the property; or, 4, fie applicant has demonstrated the dental of the applicattan will result in immediate or substantial hardship. ~D~ RISTt,..LC PRESERVATSON COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD apt 207-107-17 Date of Photo 21 JULY 1990 of Page 14 rnf1~~T n~M 3os View looking SOUTHWEST H25TOnaC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Addrecc 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD ~ App 207-]O] ©riginal Poor Quality - Date of Photo 21 JULY ]990 of 17 306 View Looking SOUTH Hi~''"ORIC PRESERVATION CONMISSI'" LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD AP! 207-10-17 Oat¢ Of PhOtO of Page LJH3 =r ` '' 'dal Poor Quality .~. ~ v ~~..., ~ .-... vs•v Looking NORTHWEST Date of Photo 3a 7 HIST(..,aC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ~AHDMAAR SURVEY Aadrecc: 5270 FOOTHILL BLVD. y~pf 207-101-17 ©riginal Poor ~,~au~y view Looking NORTHWEST ' Date of Photo 21 JULY 1990 o[ Page Sag _ HIS4 _.tIC PRESERVATION COMM2SSIOh LANDMARK SURVEY Aedr~cs: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD .App 207-101-17 f~ri~inai Poor i~ual~ty Vter Looking Date of Dhoto 21 JULY 1990 Pa9. 5 Ot 2g/ HIST !C PRESERVATION COMMISSION _ANDMARR SURVEY Addr~as: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD ~ APB 207-101-17 Original Poor Quality Date of Photo 21 JULY 1990 of Pa ~/b • view tookioq NpRTHEAST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: x270 FOOTHILL BLVD Apa 207-101-17 Or"fg~nal Poor Quality Date of Photo 21 JULY 1990 Page' of PageJ4 L.7H3 ~/~ Yfew LdOKiag RIS1..•IC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ..ANOMARR SURVEY Aadr~ss: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD AP! 207-~~~-~~ '©riginal Poor Quality W ew Looking Date of Phato 2] JULY 1990 of ~~..~.- HIS•i _.tIC PRESERVATION CONHISSION 4ANDMAAK SURVEY Address: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD App 207-101-17 ~rigina~ Poor Quality - 21 JULY 1990 Date of Photo of ~~ view Looking SOUTHEAST HIS iZC PRESERVATION COMNISSIG. LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 5270 FOOTHILL BLVD APB 207'101-17 Date of Photo 21 JULY 1990 of ~~r Wew Looking NORTHEAST -- - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LAN~HARR SURVEY Adare66: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD ~Pa 207-101-17 G~ii~inaf_Poor Quality EAST j~i~11 LVVAIII~ Date of Photo 21 JULY 1990 Pagefl of Pa0e.~{ LJHJ / tom. z ~.~ __ ..,~ , . ,,.,,+ HIST....IC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1.ANDNARK SURVEY Addr.u: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD ,App 207-101-17 ~:r ", ~ o' UC' i-~uo:~l.Y ---... -WEST VieN Looking 21 JULY 1990 Date of Photo of HISY..~tIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Aaarsas:8270 FOOTHILL BLVD 'Aw 207-10] '®Cig~r+a! Po°r Quality ` Date of Photo ZI JULY 1990 PsgaJ~ of Paq•1~ 17 i~ WEST WeM Looking HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: 8270 FOOTHILL BLVD Are 207-101-17 ~r~g~na~ ~oor_Quaiity 21 JULY 1990 Date of Photo Page of Pagel LJH3 vte~w lockt;~g Ml?RTH Ctty of Rancno Cucamovga Applscat ion for _ HISTORIC LANDYARR i1GNATIDN fl IHTORIC PDiNT OF ...TEREHT DESIGNATION Hlstonc Laedmara Rist or sc Po tnt of :niecest Otner Daat 1 v IDENTIFICATION 1. coon name: Red Chief Motel - China Allev Restaurant 2. Nietor is name, it known: Red Chief Motel s Cafe s. Street or Rural Aadreae: 8270 Foothill Blvd. city: Rancho Cucamonga zip: 91730 county: San Bernardino Aeseeeorb Parcel No. 207-101-1 woe: S C legal De script ion:C camgnga Fruit Lands FT:].E 200 Ft. Lot 4; N of State Hwy Sec 9 TP 15 R 7W EX ST 9. Present Owner, if anown: A.6.L.O.Prtnepddre•e: 2890 Inland Empire B1 Vd. City: ORtariO 21p: 91764 Dwner•Dip 1•: DuDllc~_ SUlte 102 private 5. Present use: Rest/Co]ImI: Rental ozi(ina3 u•e: Motel 6 Cafe DESCRIPTION 8. Briefly describe the Dregnt DDy .Seal aDdarapce of the alto or atru<ture and dLLarlDe Roy Y,Ior a lterat ionL~ron StL ori(leal coedit ion: Site consists of o ne- Btory cafe and two and two unattached rows of ei ght, one-storv motel units with garages A ti e-c anoed stucco wah ioins the northern ends of th e motel rows. The -nh+hunhnvl aevl~ is Mia9inA AT FnaM A)1 RPViVal. 7. Loca<Sop ~ki[cE up Zdraw 1 label (. ApDroaleute Droperty •tze: •ite and •urroundln( aLTNta, IqL 512. (in feat) rntda, and Dromin•nL 1Lnd.arta): }TOOLa(e 1 DeptD -"' ~ OT aDDTOa. aC rea(e 1• • 9. Condition: (eDSCk one) a. ELCa1 Uot D. Good e. LLSr X d. Pater iorated_ ~~ L. No loner in Lx iatence_ 10, la tDL fLLLBr•: 1. Altered?_ D. Un-ltarwdT X 11. 9urroundln(a: (check mores than o•s Sf newa•ary) i a L. open land X dl ~ - ~ ~ D. Maldaptla3 c. 9catt•rsd Duildinp X Q d. OepaLly Du Slt-up_ 1lsIC :~ L. Co®erc lal~ !. Industrial ~1 9303 ® p (. Other U llc. THi4 93(4„ * Arroyo Des Los Osos Partnership 3, 12. 'Ihrexts to Site: a. Move kvown~_ b. Private development c. Zontng_ d. Dubuc Ilo rka Project e. t'an d¢l ism_ f. Other_ 13. Dates of enclosed phgtog n ph(s) ,innP 77. 1990 NOTE: the Sg110e 1qR (Items 14-19) flee far structures only. i9. Primary exterior bu ildlnR material: •. Store _ b. Brick c. Stucco X d. Adobe_ e. Rood X_ f. Other X:tile 15. Is the Strvct ere: a. On I[e oriR iq al alt e? yes b. Yoved? c. Uvkvoen? 16. Year of Ivi<Sal Cava<ructlon: 1936 This Date le: •. Factual X b. Estimated 37. Architect (if kvoeo ): 16. Buf ides (if kvoeq): ,lnhn F .la mac 19. ftelatsd Features: a. Barq b. CarrlaRe house n. Outhouse d. Shetl(e) e. roraal Gardeo(a) f. Iligdmill `. 1latertoeer/LVkhouee h. Other 1. Nova SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state hl atorlcal avd/or arehltactural imDOrtagce (igclude dates, evert, avd penoe eaoelated Hth the •1ta sew kvovq ): _The_ site served as a ma iaz travel route £or Native Americana as well as Spanish a Angio explorers a settlers. The site __~ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ c v ~i.c Cucamonga arse's overland Butterfield Stage Stop c. 1850. *See below 21. Yaly than of see hlagrlt rewurcr. (chwk ovly ove): •. Arehitecture b. arts a Lel sure c. Ecovulc/Iaduatrl-1~_ d. Govergmeot e. ExDlOrat SOn/aettleeavt f. Military R. ftel laloa h. Social/Etlucatlon 22. Source: 61st hoot , d cunvgta, wrveya, parwoal SnterVSe•a, ed teelr sat..: e1ac~C, Rancho Cucamonga i Dona Merced, (1975) , City Directions: 1934 G 1951; Interviews with: Ada Cooper; ~ S° Cw 23. Date fon prepared 6/28/90 6y (na~a ): Anfh a Har in Aeer.aa:10500 Civic Center c12 ~ancho Y: uCaman~a 21p:91730 Phoaai (714)989-1861 Organ izat iov: Plannin0. Deot_ 3(~0 ::y vas only •The current structures exemplify roadside amenities that resulted from Che use of Route 66 in the 1930'x-1950'x. *'Gene 13111ingai Betty McKay; and Verne Hialrichsen (June 1990). Frankl.sh, "Out O'the West", San Bernardino Sun, 4/19/1961; 1937 ems.. px. ,rain., r~,jn.,. c,_rvA,.. .. Ac«_. .. geld Gcid= .n An=ri~an ~' urg,rtai_roor_ ~ua,,.~ AiJ ARCHAEG~OGiCA~ ASSESSMENT Oh THE SYCAMORE ViLLAG'e PROJECT SITE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAID 3'cRNARDINO COUNTY Mathteen C. Del Charlo Carol R. Dsmcak .~•:.a1 Inv=_st rr .rccaeo'oc;cai =..e,o~-ra ~~~rz,sran- --rp-_~r--.-n 79a5 W, Commonwealth Avenue, Sutra C Fu1le r:on, C.. ?2533 For: ?L=cnin3 tis :work 4940 Inland Emp '. re 9culavard, :vita ~w Ontario, CA 91674 May, 1990 3~/ ~~'~%.a`a~ ~ QOr O> ra r; ; INTRODUCTION This report presents the fintlings of an archaeological resources assessment contlucted on the proposed Sycamore villaoe Site in the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Cal ;'torn ia. Tha purpose of iris assessment was tp identify and evaluate any prehistoric cultural resources which rni=ht .e creser.t c.^. t.3 crocerty and which r_u'.d b_ ',mpae tad by preposad e3valepm _ __ _,_ pariei (sea __GCmpanY'.ro historical ae5°SS.^,.3nt Pc~r _. eat~~3ni e' hiS:Cf'C __ar a. 'n] a Sj 3'smai' ~.~-' eldJ^al /, i'r3r' ..aa ]e~SCf G.3] :y __ __.~>i -r. - an,t-. -al °3's C'J rCe C-]? Corporation (AnMC). Carol R. 'vemcax,-a,Scciety cf Fro-'ESSional Archeologists (SO'rA) field cartif ietl __. .,, cd.,"J_is:. =3"\?^ 35 _ . ., ],.. _ ,33.1.3 `_C r. Location -h3 pro iec: aria 13 found norm of ar4 adj3o 3rtt Lo Focchili B]'J 131'3rd 'ri t.= city Gf ~a nChp ~uCapCr?a. It .Cr3i3t3 Cf -rCxlmaL31V __ '_Cre3 any .3 ^__rrr3n ~~'e t"e a -_ _ _ _ ~~Ca^iG rE save ral small tusln35sas, pr _:e ,aslc3nce. a water tack and a r3sarvoir. -hs =ed ~i11 Ccu r,uv ~ _] era - aminiu^. r -.,.3 nc=_s are f]untl __ :.,_ ....: .".3 ~ S.,_ 7.: ivy ve Tc - _Cn1 ap, ^3 :E?7-'.e '~s~,_„nd "I^a'1 _ e_..3y°~ ]Crt Cni] iC.,.3.i-] r ._._ _. _- , M38t -'_ - 1l. B=TTiNG ?hYS1ca1 Ca~ting Tha property is found at the southern base of what is called -n etl Hitl, low hills uplifted from the bread, 5antly scuthWard slcpin3 Cucamcc;a Fan. 'his aria 31'. ial `an calends so.th from the San Gacriei Hcuntains :o '_re S_n:a :na R1Ver. Tn3 .]w nllle _r7 ma3a5 w^i_^ rlc3 a]GV3 `1dGd plain W8r9 3 fOCJ3 OT p!chtatpr•c ^„an aG :'V1Ly,c Springs, often found within theca favlte4yareas (!4artz 13:6:3), one: fed a urge marsn at th• base of Retl Hill. Cucumonga Creek, now channelized, is fount' approximately 1 kilometer east cf Lha project area, and .a en evsntual tributary of the Santa Ana River. Topographical ty, the project area consists of a portion of the flet fan and th• lower part of the southernmost toe of Red Hill, Two Steep into rmittant drainages, possibly spring-fetl, cross the property in a southerly tlirection, Elevations on site range from 1250 Lo 13E0 feet ebove sea level. L~~~ .. ~_ .. ....; .. .:~, .. .... ~ . • s ~re f. i, I .~ - ~ .. 1 Figu r. 1. ?rojeat Area. Taken From U5,5 i.$' Series Topographic Map, ',uaa ti QuaE rang le 1 IIM lM1 Y1l0 Ir00 :aa ~. ~ ~ ~ Alkmalw /Or~Fj~r~G' , ~~ /~ (iriginal Poor Quality; °andy, alluvial deposits containing metamorphic cobbles such as schists, gneisses and puartzites were found on the flatter. portions of the project area, while the characteristic red clay soil of Retl Hiii was observed cn t'ne k nolltop. 3c .n n.;tiv? ar~d i~^, troduced plant =sec i?s war? cctatl with it the project area. Among the native plant species noted were S?`:'e ral W?il-Of Oh"1 5yG3mOrE 3, cOaet liV= c=ks, b'JC<wn?3t, ~"? pr?n15~priC vJlt r3i 52 -~.?rC=S _-_~ '_~_ -a c,• =?\?'C-E.. =Or Cdastal SOULhe TuCalifOfnid naV°-~baen applied by coma ?SSarChars ` tf3 inland 3r°a3 as '.911, _„°?W In th19 area, hOWaVBr, thaL~Lhe applicaoil~; ty Of OOLStaI ~ s^,theses to interior cultural d?velcpment eti11 r?rains tc _= t=stay. _ -O _r3 O_e7 ctmolE w .vim' r31 3Yn1, ?a2a `- _ S^ - e ~a °Crn1a CG'_St3'. 3!a' r~aV_ ..?d' :hvsv " Kay'=- :y°_ = c 'darren (1533). h'allaca's`seGUanca (/355iI~as -asa^ _- 1' tad 5 J atla'raDniG eVibenC9 _rd h_' ere a-Ed wi=^p.- _ -l.. - radiOC of b7n dat39. iO~r=~i~i~i r=1 r. . - -..__Jlat3d WntGn 'w5r9 _,~T '1?~ -Gr1CCn _. Ear y-N^~~^_ .n'=!m9dlat3,=aGd :~JriZOn _\.~c L-_? r_n a__!'_, ^. _ N'311aC3~5 GhfOnOlOy-y has C?9n Lpf31d wttn L^e ;C~U mJ~a-1L- cf ^C re faCent to-3. " -ldrizon I: c'er7y N,an Arising from Lata Pleistocana anC early pest-3lacial t`m=_s, t^a early i4an Hcrizcn (Naltace i$_'S} 15 r?prey?ntae cv °-=t.e red arti{actual and !'_-an s~?'.?..1 ma-a n a15. •~ - r?cpnrtructicn o' subsistancg patt?rrs era s etcny, a ~, of ground stone sea d-grinding toola aicng wlth tna pr?sauce ~f crudely pa rcussicn>flakad sO.raaars rnd b;facas •^,dlcatas, perhaps, nn emphasis on hunting during this psriotl. Horizon II: Early Mi1lirgstone Common throughout southern California, Millingston• assemblages (Wa11ac• 1955) ar• typified by a prepontlerence of menos end metetes with few Grojectile points, indicatinc a dependanu on plant gathering rather than hunting, Asaemblages also include hammersiones, choppers and a variety of scraping end cutting tools. Faunal remains and projectile points ar• rare. 3 ~/ '©reginal Poor_Qua((ty, Horizon IZZ: Zntarnediate wallaca's Intermediate Horizon (1955) was best described for the northern counties of Santa Barbara and Ventura and is typified by large, stemmed projectile points which occur more frequently suggesting, Gerhaps, that individual hunting ndC Become inc r?asin9lY •npc rtan :, I+c mars 3"C p?<_Llas, utilized for the processing of acorns aid o*_her p•~1py Foods. aooear Curing this c?recd. Shell beads and crr=_-~a r.cs _._ ___, -_ _ -.-c_e..-,iv a ,_ -. - !aLS ?r3nistc n c ",o rizpn (<dl lac=_ 1955) saw bc'tn ~n d] rCF^iE nt 3rtifc::Le. ~rJ,7ECL1 a point S,dre 3m311ef, np lying th?ir use as 3rrcwhedcs rain?r :=,an Cdrt aoi ^~ts -- -3~a cr _on:a,c -alas. Tr3b? .E r.- -..cn =-•st?at.ta zno obsidian apoear with greater fre c:.'?ncy~and mortuary F rL.L'C?s t?Cbm2 ..^..p r? e~3pGra_?. c _. ..- _pni_3i1y. _ne e~dj?c, crc_ar.Y li=_3 an 3r?3 ,=.r=_ a,r ?r '.._t _ L._^Ser 3no - _a_. ail.. _-- .=5aarc~~?r3 how?v?r, placaV""•?l _rrarp with•~n -re _3. _= dfOt^_ =353, caa: '' Caj cn ~aa4 l=°-='t 3]d _m'I L't` .rr - i so v-.?~^mn-he sc•..Ln -^ ,'_-uce7 .n? n3_?..^ar.?d3 Gf the LCS AnC21?3, 53n`i3Or121 and 53n.d _^ ._ i I '1 =1'' d .J' l~ h 7 7% .: 5. 7) i i J 2 J l t t t 9- ._ ~ apO..t - air cui.ure 3i t.^=ucn :n a:' r?r? -^cu;r __ _.e b??n-One Cf the wealthiESt Lnd mOSt infl•JEnt'al grC.'Oe 3O'i t^ c' tns Tahachadi (Kroaber 79?5 ). The Gabri8lino were Shcshons an hunt?r-gath?r?rs racsd fcr Hair dffiii cn with _.~_ ~<+ssicn =_.~ G>_triai. -ranis:.ricall~, - ?y '..E^? - -. to o_ „ _c?s 31tV3ted in flat, erLi is valleys surrounde cy's atali~~,L camps fpr saascnal crocur?ment „- rsso:.rc?s and cY s-- jai activity areas (Bean and Smitn 7978:543-4 ). The project area i} 1gCeted in the t8rritdry pf nn,e 3J.n abriaiirio viilags Called Cucamonga which is fountl just to the northeast on high ground overlooking Cucamonga Cresk. The village Cucamonga, translated to mean "sandy place", was situaUd near a spring which provided an abundance of resources Lo the Gabrielino (Martz 197x:8). The material culture of Lhe Gabrielino wee marKed by a highly developed creftsmeneh ip, and even th• most utilitarian obj ecte were endowed with neathatic appeal. They are probably beat known for their widespread use of steatite 'cr a va~isty cf i.e~s ra^ging fro, car:=~ 3~s '~a~~~ lj) of ~®®r Quality. . effigies, pipes and ornaments Lo cooking utensils. Other items of their material culture inclutled ornaments of shall, bone and stone, basketry, cordage, shell fishhooks, flak@d Stone arrowpointa and knives, and plant processing tools such as mnnos and metates, mortars and pestles (Bean and Smith 1979). The first European to encounter the aboriginal population at Cucamonga was Francisco Gerc?s, missionary ?xolor9r and ]ia n st for *_B3 C Anta expe:;ition, in 1i7=, 3arces r?oc~ted the Iocaticn of the village to th9 IAission S_n .._- '3i (?lack ie;°i __ '.^.'~ ~n? .-ie5ien .rC"1i ~~~g _r9bt trldt in? vllld3? t° CUC amOnCg Wd5 Gniy part;al:Y . ]]rG ^3t3y ^,LO Lh@ mj$3']n S'3t ... _r~ t,,-' tf!i3 __ _] in 1i95, relatively late 1n the Mission pen od (Munoz-1992). During this period, the plain was used primarily for cattle and ' ao~ graz; ng. The growing hertls soon attracted the attention of hostile Ca3e r.: it ibes who r@aeatadly raiC@d the area for stock (Slack 1375). These forays, along with the general arrest f]lioW irg secularization in 1934, Cecimated the ar@a of both .t3 ..atL13 and iLS ratiV? pOpulatiOn who lied intD th? r=9rOy hi 11S for protection, in 194D, UOn TiDJ rCiO Tepid constructed a fortress-like house on Red Hitl just north9dst th3 prOj@Ct ar8a, Gn lLnd granted t0 h•.m ty Gov@rnor <t:arado. Tans °°_CCC -- -gp;a,,;~n ~;ne stock Kara, -.C a plant the °•.rst'VinB)'E rtl3vin the arse with CUtt1n,5 from tn? .. ~p ihar vine Yarc' ..~ Ln3 !4is31cn San Gacr;dl (RO;'e 1369). ~9f th@ M9%1Can-4m@rican e'er. th3 R anchO was 5G1~ -r,n R alms antl his wife in 1953. Rains constructed the fir3ty fired Crick house as well ss the first winery in the area which is ~ih operation today as the Thomas Bros. Winery. After Rains was murtlered in 1862, the land was subdivid@tl (91dck 1375). Cna of Rtiina' tenants, Silly Rubcttom, eracteC a tavern anc 3 stage station within the project arse near the r t9 pf tte 5 ycamor• Tnn. RubO ttom reportedly Savetl Lh• widow Rai.^.s from n lY^ch moD who @rnuaed tho ..idpw of the nw rder of her husband in 1962. His one-room inn serWd pafaen gars of Che Butte rf ie'd Stage en route between Los Ang•lea and San Be rnardinp, In 1972, after Unc 7• Billy's Tavern, es it wsa called, was razed by fire, the Sycamore Inn wee established by John Kluemen to serve es a social canter for the people of Cucamonga. The Sycamore Inn fa in operation et present as a commercial reeteurant (Stets of California Department of Parks and Recrention 1975). 3~.~ RECORDS/LITERATURE SEARCH A records search for the project site was pe rfermed by Dr, Lester Ross of Lha Archaeolo9 ical Information Center zt the San 8ernartlino Cou r.tY Museum, the official recositcry fcr San ee rna rdino County site maps and recortls antl the regional - ear ir~ghouse fcr the 5*_ate Cffic? of Historic Pro=_?^: >_ticn ~°-'C)• '!-__ ?.._rGS __=_rch ^dicdted thzt c^a o.?nisc~-~c sur=:c? scat ~Er „= ?;gnt 9rouncstGC§ art-~racts, was re cc rc?J Flv§rs li,2 nrcnaeJlJglCal =?s§arCn !'nlt^(UC'<A.RU)^l!'ar:¢- 13i5). hhils the site form indicat?d that the S1t3 drEd Wd3 _ Gr0~?]' a,- _ IJCdt?: in an arEa ] -rG3 '-_' _ _ ~GC'Ja Gf mLJn ^adGri]indl aG :iVi:y. TJ the r,o rtn and r.crt^eas: zre - co s.p lax Gf sit?s - -^. rn ih? Jrehis:c ric .. 2CiGng3 \' i i _- k'ni 13 50^° Jr5^. StG r' Cai .=5 ~_. _ ..:,dJ'JG:§dlv Jean ^et t7 ^?Oe1GpmEnt in :nis .??.' ~rCnfi?JiJO1Gd1 investigations nave bEen GCndLC:eJ Jn 5?b?^d 5':E- c.'?3, C tly 7y arena?G J. :Gal -•?I- _§ava f r:-{'>GrGJ'•? SJJ'1 xSyC31:-Grni3 3:0 :? '1 ~1•"~^e+'+--_ ,_-_ ___ -i1PJr^.... S:ata PJ1Y __ r,ni_ .rs _._,_-__. _ - '=, _'~ ~~:~ pan An:Gnid CJiI?3ed. ~:GrJ~ :_ tens?CiJyiGai Infcrm3LiGn C?ntEr, ._ pre:dJii~' f Y f „J~n^y :rchis:G r'G arGh3eOld9iJa1 raSC .f :?E wtt-.''~ _ _ =_J___„ =roper:Y was hi C~ne site, CA-Sir-901/270, was excavated in the 7370's and 1950's by studsnts untler the tlirection of _rs. Hal Eb?rhzrt, Fred Reinman antl Thomas 3lackburn (Balls 1983). This larva villa9a situ, wish a tYp ically Miilirgs :ens (Wei?dca +. __) zssambiags, had rdd•GGirbcn Cites p'acira _ wa'i ..~:h n What is considarso to oa !acs PrE,n1s:: n c 'n CGas .3i ar2d3 lEading :o the r5'JGthasis -~_ .,tar --till i~c;:- e cultures persisted until t'ne~time of contact (Solis 1343). Balls suggested, furthermore, baseC Gn artifact any f,';nal analysis. that the settlenent paLUrn of the prshisto r c populations in this area was central-based wandering. Th? investigations at CA-SBr-S9S, a satellite camp located approximately 5 km to the northeast of the project area, seem to support this hypothesis (Allen 1982). FIELD SURVEY AND RESULTS On May 18 and 23, 1990, ARMC personnel Kathleen Del Chario, Kathleen Ward and Carol Demcak systematically surveyed all undeve loped portions of the Cro'ect area. Tha su r\~?y_-s walked :he property in transacts spaces at iG-1c ,^.=_ter 3~ 7 _~~ ~;II r,^~_~ i~ ~ .,~ : Ilty ~ I 1 ,. .. i I .. !i .. i , ~ %'€ i . 1,. .... .. .. 1 .. ~.n n ...... .Ih': .. a.. ~ 111 _ .. ~IS.. ,C - 1 ,... .ely~ IJ _ ~ ~ r ~ ~. .1---- -. 1 ___ _- _. .. r.~cr: _. _ _ ~. _ r~ ~ _ _ _ 1 . ~• ~ ,,~• _ wr '' II EMI I' 1 ~ ,.. ~ tL~ 1.., ~ i 1:.... '~ se F(gure 2. Recorded Loeetlon of CA-SBr-897, Taken from USGS 7.5' Series Topogreph lc Map, Guastl Qwdrengle IIN 11N 11N INI i Nsl hRgsHu~ 3,ag _ ~~B'~glriar t~,. _ '~ir~~inrZ~ P~J~9° QUd~l1y intervals while inspecting the ground surface for any si5ns of prehistoric activity such as scatters of lithie artifacts and debitage, derkanetl midden sail, and shellflah end faunal remains. For the most part, visibility ranged from poor to good due Lo a cover of weeds antl grasses over most of the project area. The western tlrajnage was choked with impenetrable vegetation, and the area behind the =yczmora Inn was covered with a very thick mai of leaves ahC yrasa making it impossible to observe tra ground surface ExcEp: in rodent bzckdirt. Tha repcrdad location of CA-53r-8?7 was clc=_aly sc r,.ini:?d. _^ :n15 cr2a, =i^~=_erJU.^,~ 31..^F_Ca 'J 1s1]i i i:i nay arse r3~i J 900d, bUt n0 pf?hlStCrip mat9rlal5 Mara obsa rved, nor Wae _ny 1nClpdtiCn Cf a S.]a::ff=-=_ d?posit anco~n'erad. The slope in this area has been disturbed by plastic pipes, -?rhaos installed to drain the runpff from the irrigation of also evident.untler the soil surface covering a witlespread area Haar the condominiums antl was perhaps inatalled to kill vegetation at one Lima. The graffiti evident on the w'a11s cf the water Lank attest tp the recant attraction of the area. n5COM4-eM1 DkTi OIvS Aii expo sad ground surfaces within :ha project 8r?a hEr? ar a.,,i nn.l anM -~~- "_ _ ~. -._i°--te -~ a.i~ iw l~a~lUa CT 3 i':.~.iJrT 3:.9 da,7:i~t, Cr•m id.En, wai a^C C'l nter$d. ~2taL_? -, :his, n0 fJrther prehiSLpf 1C arCnaBOIOgtCdl investigations are raconimendad. However since a prehistoric spatter was previously recorded in this location, and because of the 'rGansa prehistoric activity in the lapel area, it .s racommendetl that an archaeologist be present during any earth-moving activities. If subaurfac• deposits are uncovered during grading. the archaeologist shall make recommendations as to their si5nif icanu and disposition at that time, l~ 5 REFERENCES CITED Allen, Lawrence P. 1982 The Chaffay Hiilside Site, CA-SBr-895; Report of the Cultural Resource Mitigation Program. By ARMC for the U.S. Army Carps of Er.gi rears, Les A. 86166 District, Contract MDACW09-81-C-0018. Sean, Lowell Jchn and Charles R. Smith 1978a Gabrielino. In, Handbook of the North American Indians, Vo Jume 8, Celiforn ia, edited ty R.F. Hauer. pp. 538-549. Washington, D.C., Smith- sonian Institution. 147Bb Serrano. In, Mendboak of the North American Indians, Volume 8, California, etlited by R.F. He uer. pp. 570-574. Wasningtcn, D.C., Smith- sonian Institution. Black, Esther Boulton 1975 Rancho Cucamonga end Dona Ma reed. Redlands: San Bernardino County Museum Association. Fenenga, Franklin 1953 The Woighta of Chipped Ston• Potnts: A Clue to - - -- -- - ..oi t.: r" not vi rini.iuu- DeIOOV'9(3):-309-323.~~Albuque rque. K roeber, A.L. 1925 Nendbook of the Indians of California. 2ureeu of American Ethnology 3uiJetin 7B, Washington, D.C. Martz, Patricia 1978 Description end Evaluation cf the Cultural Resources, Cueamongn, Demens, Dear, and Hill- side Creek Channels, San Bernardino and Ri wraid• Counties, California, prepared by Th• University of Celifcrnia, Riverside, Archeological Research Unit for th• Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeiu Diatrict, Technicnl psport C ',8-t. Munoz, Jeanne 1982 A Psrttel Index to the Mission San Gabriel Bsptism, Marriage and Death Registers. Prepared Dy ARMC for the U. 3. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angetee Diatrict. Contract NDACW08-81-C-0016. Ro11e, Andrew F. 1969 California: A Mfatory. Thomas Y. Crowell, N.Y. 330 9 Sells, Roy 1983 The Libsrty Grove Site: Archasa logical Zntsr- prstaLiona of a Late Millingatone Site on the Cucamonga Pia in. Coyote Press, Selinns. State of Californin Oept. oP Parka and Retraction 1975 Point of Hiatorieel Interest No. 70. Wallace, W111iam.J. 1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 11(3):214-230. A1DUquerque. Warren, Clautle N. 1985 Cultural Traditions and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. Zn, Archaic Prah/story in the Western United States, C. Irwin-Williams, editor, pp. t-14. Eastern New Mexico Univsraity Contributions fn Anthropology, 1(3). Portoles. 10 ~33/ RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 90-02 TO DESIGNATE THE RED CHIEF MOTEL ANO CAFE, 8270 f00THILL BOULEVARD, AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN: 207-101-17. HH ER EAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the orooosed Historic Landmark Designation. S ELTI ON 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Nisto ric Preservation Commission hereby makes the following findings for the Red Chief Motel and Cafe and its site. A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, or way of life. 2. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common, but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Tho nnnnna e_r_I 1fnAT, n4 1.. :._. L-..:..- --------.- .. ~..p u.nu u established and familiar visual-- feature of the neighborhood, community, and City. SECTION 2: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEl)A. (Article 19, Section 15308). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission does hereby recommend approval of Historic Landmark 90-02 to designate the Red Chief Motel and Cafe, 8270 Foothill Boulevard, and its site, to the City Council as ar. Hfstoric landmark. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF AUGUST. 1990. BY: Bob Schmidt, Chairman AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~3~- '^haiLman Schmidt recessed to the joint Historic Preservation Commissfon Park and~RGc reation Meeting - Item 8 on the agenda. r ~ ~ r (These minutes are being prep separately t mit to Lhe Commission at the next scheduled meeting in Septe .) • + x Chairman Schmidt nvened the regular Historic ~P~eservat ion Commission meet inq at M. . + ... \ D. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 90-02 - 7HE RED CHIEF MOTEL AND CAFE Anthea Ha rt ig, Assistant Planner, presented the Staff Report and passed out an additional Staff Report with an analysis on the adaptive re-use study done on the Red Chief by the applicant and a copy of the December 21, 1988 City Council Staff Report regarding Landmark designation. Mr. Henderson reminded the Commiss ton of the poi Tcy Historic Preservation Commission adopted in 1988 regarding desfgna tang a property a Landmark over a landowner's objection. The following criteria was established: A. The property is on the City's Htstor ical Inventory. B. The property stands out as ha vfng outstanding historical, architectural, cultural or aesthetic significance. C. The designation would help protect the property. Preservation Commission meeting Vand that itC1wasostaffLSr opin ions tha ttothe property had outstanding historical significance to the City. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Richard Crean, General Partner, Arroyo Oes Los Osos Partnershi 1 overview of his company's involvement in the project and introducedpmembers of his project team. a Larry Holff, Nolff, Lang and Christopher, the project architect, briefly ' explained his adaptive re-use study. He stated it was his belief that the Red Chief did not seem to fit fn with the "design vocabulary" of the Foothill Specific Plan. Ne expressed their market analysis po toted out that specialty ~e"t^1~"re~st~uran `, anA professional offices would be the best possiblo use thief would at properly. He further commented that removing the Red preserve more of the existing trees and involve 4he least amount of disturbance to the existing land at the site. Comm155toner Banks asked why they felt visibility on Foothill Boulevard was so important when at least three of the buildings would have their backs to the HDC"MINUTES - 9 - AUGUST 2, 1990 ~~ 6x1.'.b~-h (~' street and the two other buildings would have their sma l~l est face to the street. Mr. Wolff felt because the structure was a much larger, two-story structure, it would have greater visibility. He commented further that the buildings with their backs to Foothill would be professional office rather than retail. He also stated that they were trying to "build-in" a market where the businesses would create bus loess for one another. Commissioner Preston asked if Mr. Holff had contacted staff for their input as to what information would be needed for his adaptive re-use study. Mr. Wolff said he had not contacted staff because of the limited timef rame he was working with to prepare his report. Commissioner Preston questioned staff if the City had a policy or gu idetines regarding CEQA reports being prepared by outside firms. Mr. Henderson replied that there was no set policy but that it was highly unusual for the applicant to prepare their own reports; normally, requests for proposals are taken, the applicant is allowed to comment, the City Council makes the final selection and [he applicant pays for the studies. Commissioner Pres tan asked if an attempt had been made to provide financial incentives to allow for the protection or rehabilitation of the structure with a Proforma analysis. Mr. Wolff stated a Proforma analysis was done and would be passed out with one of the other speakers later in the evening. Commissioner Preston stated he had two basic concerns: 1) Is the structure e aoa ~ynn,imi, anu cl ,r is '1y wormy, then 15 there something that can be done to protect the structure on this site or another site. He further stated he did no4 feel the data presented in the applicant's adaptive re-use study was reliable as it did not touch on considerations such as a range of alternatives, financial incentives, consideration of the Mills Act, possible tax mechanisms, or grant programs and because those questions were not answered he felt could not make an Tnformed decision. Steve Van Normer, Historian, Consultant to the Protect Proponents, stated he had prepared his report on the Red Chief based on record searches from the San Bernardino County Museum, USGS maps, surveys on file at the San Bernardino County Surveyor's office and two field Inspections. He further stated that based on his field inspections and an CEQA criteria, he did not feel that the structure could be Dreserved or mitigated with documentation to aid in the public's understanding of the historical development of Rancho Cucamonga, Commissioner Haskvitz asked what was lacking that would have made this site significant. HPC~MINUTES - 10 - AUGUST 2, 1990 ~3 ~ Mr. Van Wormer felt that the structure did not have strong ~a ssoc lotions with the "thematic" developments of the area i.e., it was not significantly important to the growth and development of specific types of industry or agriculture in the area. He also felt that it did not represent the "Mission" architectural style. Commissioner Arner asked if Mr. Var. Normer felt the Red Chief had historical merit based on its association with Route 66. Mr. Van Wormer stated he did not base his evaluation on that factor because it had no ties with the development of the community. Commissioner Barks questioned then why the Sycamore Inn was considered an important element in the area's development. Mr. Van Wormer commented that the Sycamore Inn had been in existence much longer than the Red Chief making it more historically significant to the area. Commissioner Billings stated that he had a long standing concern in that he would like to see a preservation effort far Lhe entire Bear Gulch atmosphere and he felt that this pro,iett did that with the efforts to save the Sycamore trees as well as adding trees. He felt the Red Chief was more a point of interest. Tcm Snyder, Founder and President of the Route 66 Association, Ventura County, stated he was appearing as a representative of the highway and he received no fee for his comments. He~comnented that he started a movement in 1983 to preserve elements of the Route 66 Highway and that efforts have been geared toward saving the most his to rfcally significant structures or most significant continuity of activity along the route. He mentioned that he had been unable to substantiate any evidence or reference to the Red Chief as being important .~_ .~ .~~.. ..i u v~ , unc i»c-i>.i i. Commissioner Cooper asked what years the highway was considered Route 66. Or. Snyder replied that the highway was started in 1929 and completed in this area in 1932; boom periods for Lhis area were during the migration west from Oklahoma (1937-1941) and also when steel workers in Detroit were given two-week paid vacations for the first time (1946-1958). Commissioner Banks asked if he felt the New Kansan motel would merit any special significance for Route 66. Or. Snyder commented he Aad been by and looked at the New Kansan and felt it also would not be nationally significant to the highway. Cm~.~~i;;ioner Banks asked for ciarificatton on whether Or. Snyder felt the City had any hlstorf cal motor courts. Dr. Snyder answered no; the Sycamore Inn and the Magic Lamp would be the maJor points of interest here from a Route 66 perspective. HPC"MINUTES - 11 - AUGUST 2, 1990 335 Commissioner Haskvitz mentioned that the Red Chief was where the poorer people had stayed and that the richer people generally stayed at the Sycamore Int. He asked how many motor coo rt5 along Route 66 also had a res tau~ant. Dr. Snyder stated it was fairly uncommon to have both but not ne,:essari~~y significant unless the restaurant end the motel operated jointly from the begirtn ing and continued to operate together. Ms. Ha rtig reiterated what Commissioner Haskvitz had stated rega ruing the ty!te of people staying at either the Red Chief or the Sycamore Inn. In addition, she asked Dr. Snyder what field his doctorate was in. Dr. Snyder replied his doctorate was in social psychology. ~Cen Henrickson, Professor of History, emeritus; President and Superintendent, emer i~:u s, Chaffey College, stated he agreed with Commissioner Billings' view that preserving the Bear Gu ich area as a focal point should be pursued. He also asked the Commission to think about preservation with economic viability in mind; the Sycamore Inn has always been economically viable where the Red Chief was only fora short while. Matt Jordon, Project Manager and Partner, Arroyo Des Los Osos Partnership, ant CPA, passed out a financial analysis to the Commission. He commented that rehabilitating the project would De eztremely expensive and would not have th~! economic draw that their project would create for the tenants and the City, He felt the Sycamore Inn, the Sycamore trees and their ambience created a ver~r s pec ia''. effect important to the project. He further stated that building coveraue of the ReA Chief site was approximately 2.1 acres or 25-30 percent of land that could 6e built on and if it remained on the site, it would "kill' the remainder of the project, economically speaking. ~ommtsstoner rresun ~~esnones tr cne adaptthe re-use Ttsca! analysis assumed that the buildings would remain in their current configuration nr if any effort had been made to consider alternatives that would make preserving the structure economically feasible. Mr. Jordon apologized for his ignorance, but stated if the project is historically significant as a landmark, he would think you would net want to change the configuration, otherwise where is the significance. Commissioner Dreston asserted that Mr. Jordon misunderstands the nature of historic preservation in California and that there is na requirement that a structure be preserved "as is". Commissioner Banks interjected ft would also be a misunderstanding of the C tty's pal scy and other pre jetis that have beer. viable, t. e., the virgin is Dare Vinery where only a small port lan of Lhe original 5tructu re mefnta fined. Commissioner Preston commented that a series of assumptions had been built into the analysts of economic feaslbtltty that were not assumptions from the Commission. He went on to say there could be 100 ways Lo Incorporate the elements of the Red Chief Motel and make 1t work fiscally but without HPC,M1NUiE5 - 12 - AUGUST 2, 1990 ~ 3 ;~ direction on how to prepare that analysis and to look at the site in its current configuration with blinders on to econom i:: reality, would be a serious mistake for anyone in preservation to make; the assumption would then be made that the project would fail. Cononissioner Banks felt the key word in the analysis was rehabilitation: adaptive re-use was not addressed. Mr. Crean summed up his family's involvement and commitment to developing in this area with this project. He commented that a Landmark des igna Lion would not prevent the site from demolition because they could apply for a l.a ndma rk Alteration Permit for that purpose, but the ma eter of time and economic resources involved would seriously hamper the future and the success of their project. He also mentioned that their legal counsel had advised them that City staff had made a significant omission in their summary of the findings in that the City's position is not consistent with the purposes of the City's Historic Pres er•vation Ordinance which states only after finding demolition to be consistent with the ordinance can a finding be made that demolition is justified by immediate or substantial hardship to the applicant. He sta teal it was his belief that sufficient evidence had been presented to substantiate the fact that a Landmark designation would create an extreme economic hardship far his partnership. Commissioner Preston asked hypothetically if it would have made any difference if a recommendation had been made to make the Sycamore trees, the Oso Bear and the Sycamore Inn a Landmark (currently a Pofnt of Interest) rather than the Red Chief and if Arroyo Des Los Osas could have supported that decision. Mr. Crean replied he would need to think about that. Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Mr. Henderson reminded the Commission that in accordance with the Historic Preservation Ordinance, besides voting for or against the application they could choose to recommend a modified application. Commissioner Preston asked if the project would have to 6e re-advertised for public hearing next month. Mr. Henderson said that the item would need to be continual to the next Historic Preservation Cowalsslon meeting in September and it would need to be re-advertised to advertise alt the parcels in Bear Gulch and notify all the property owners involved. Commissioner Preston clarified that the Commission could choose not to designate the Red Chief as an Historic Landmark but as an alternative, recona!!e.^.d saving the other features of the Bear Gulch area if the Commission felt those features were stgniflcant enough concerns. Ne also pointed out that the Historic Preservation Coasaission could only continue to preserve structures if the Commission could show economically viable uses for them; hence, adaptive re-use studies are crttlcal. HDC MINUTES - 13 - AUGUST Z, 1990 33~ Commi55 inner Banks commented that she felt she had not 'received adequate information to base her decision on and that as a Commissioner she is obligated to explore every alterrat ive to save the City's resources. Commissioner Cooper asked if the Commission's involvement was to determine economic feasibility or historical significance. She felt the Commission's input should be historical in nature and she did not feel the Red Chief was very historical to the community. Commissioner Preston stated he felt there was validity Lo recommend local Landmark status but he also felt the same as Gommiss Toner Banks in that if there had been a conclusive study done to praSerYe portions or the who ie structure he would have been able to make a conclusive decision. Mr. Preston stated that the resolutions presently before the Commission did not document the special findings necessary to nominate over the owner's ob,lection and in the future he would want to see all the special conditions and findings documented in any resolutions. Commissioner Haskvitz felt that the site was an important site because it could be one of the last hotel/motor court/restaurant complexes left in California. He concurred that he would have wanted to see adaptive re-use data on the structure. Commissioner Cooper stated she felt it was not a significant landmark in the community. MOTION: Moved by Cooper, seconded 6y Haskvitz, carried by a split vote 4-3-0, not to approve Landmark status for the Red thief Motel and Cafe. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CODPER, BILLINGS, BANKS, SCHM[OT ';DCS: ,,,,~~~~. oS:v77C "n:,. rneiTiln, nR~6YliL, RHNtR ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried MOTION: Moved by Preston, seconded by Banks, for the purpose of setting a calendar date for a City Council public hearing to consider Landmark Designation of the entire Bear Gulch complex, minus the Red Chief Motel, incorporating the Syeamore Inn, the sign if fcant trees as determined by the Planning Department, the Oso Bear statue, and the potential arc haeoiogical resources as sign iflcant features. Ed Hobson, Attorney, Covington and Crow, oD~ected to the motion because the Bear Gulch area was not advertised in the paper and neither the property owners nor the restaurant lessee were not if led of a public hearing. He believed that the bear statue 1s already a Landmark. Commissioner Preston stated there was no need to object to this motion as it was only for the purpose of calendaring the item for City Council. HPC~MINUTES - 14 - AUGUST 2, 1990 3.~ ~ Ms. Hartig asked for tlarif ication that the Commission was concerning itself with the north side of Bear Gulch, not including the Magic Lamp. Commiss inner Preston answered that was correct. Mr. Henderson asked for clarification that the Commission recommended to the City Council denial of the application as presented tonight on a sDl it vote. He stated ancther option would be for the Commission to send a separate recommendation to the Council to initiate an application for Bear Gulch and request staff to initiate a new application next month for the Bear Gulch area as defined by the Commission. Commissioner Banks asked Commissioner Preston why he didn't ask that the Historic Preservation Commission set the matter fora public hearing. Commissioner Preston stated he did not wish to do that because Council would still have to remand it back to Historic Preservation Commission for consideration and that a report would be required. He commented that the Council could: 1) choose to take no action and then the Historic Preservation Commission could choose to initiate it; or 2) say that they did not agree and that the site plan appears to preserve the ma,lor features of the site adequately. He further stated he did not want to make the applicant return to Historic Preservation Commission for another hearing unless the Council was willing to have the Historic Preservation Commission consider Landmark status for the other features of the site. Commissioner Preston stated he wished to remove his former motion and restate it. Brad Buller, City Planner, asked if the Historic Preservation Commission's primary purpose was to alert the Council that they may 6e to king the pos Rion - icy G~~ uiyyer pic Lu re" discussion rorwa rd a5 far as Landmark Alteration was concerned. Commiss inner Preston answered yes and stated that he had heard three members of the Commission make reference to the issue that there are other building structures or features which are more significant and worthy of protection. Mr. Buller stated that on any action of this Cammtss ion the minutes along with the Commission's recommendation rrould go up to City Council. Commissioner Dreston Commented that was not strong enough, that he would prefer direc tton from the Council regarding their interests. NOTION: Moved by Preston, seconded by Banks, carried 6-1-0, to request City Council provide direction to Htstor`•c preservation Commtssion how Ccuncfl feel; regarding a poieniiai iandmarK Oesignatton for the Bear Gulch area which would include the Sycamore Inn, the significant trees, the Oso Bear statue and potential archaeological resourees, but exclude the Red Chief Motel and Restaurant Buildings. NPC MINUTES - 15 - AUGUST 2, 1990 33~ RYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, PRESTON, HAS KV ITZ, SCHM IDT A RIVER NONE BANKS, BILLINGS, --ca rrfed ...+: NEH Bi!S iNESS No new business to present. R .. + + COMMISSION BUSINESS No commission business to present. .... . ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements to present. • • R t i PUBLIC COMMENTS iia iv, Lila yvv~ .C ..,..,.~,~-._ .. _. _ ..~"_°_. 8 4 4 4 4 AOJOU RNMENT The Historic Preservation Commis5lon adjourned at 11:41 PM to an adjourned meeting at 6:00 PM on August 16, 1990 at the Thomas lifnery site located on the northeast Corner of foothill and Ytneyard in Rancho Cucamonga. Re~spectfullya~submitted. V a-~ Shelley A. Petre111 Secretary NPCRMiNUTES - 16 - /7v AUGUST 2, 1990 t, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DP.TE: September 5, 1990 70: Mayor and Members of Ciiy Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Prinr jpal Pla ^.n er SUBJECT: STATUS OF REC YCLiNG CENTERS IN SHOPPING CENTERS ABSTRACT: This report is an update to the City Ceuncil on recycling centers at shopping centers. STATUS: Since Lhe last report to the Council on February 7, there has been some change in the status of recycling centers within Rancho Cucamonga. On August 1, 1990, staff conducted a field inspection of all ten convenience Zones within the City and determined that with the exception of Alber tsons all supermarkets have some form of recycling program. Albert sons no longer has the red/green/blue igloo-shaped recycling Dins and is referring people to other locations. See Exhibit A for a summary of the current recycling activities at each center. The State has ce rti ff ed six recycling centers within the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Exhibit B), of which three are located outside convenience a„t,, c~]tCr nrc7. ,~', ;a, ,,, iia rkei, riughes, ana Luc ky's are in compliance with the City'screg ulatio ns. Alpha Beta (9640 Base Line) is operating a reverse vending machine recycling program in violation without a Recycling Facilities Permit from the City. Only one application for a recycling facility permit (Goodwill industries) was filed in the last 18 months. They have opened a recycling center behind the Stater Bros. Market at 9750 19th. Ci BB :gs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Recycling Centers Exhibit "B" - Cer ti fled Recycling Centers Exhibit "C° - Convenience Zones ~/~ ('~ U U Y 2 `Q m ~ 5 st N U '~ '° '" ~ m Y > > > ~ U c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z cm n ~~~ m N ~~~3~ d $ s~~~~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 8 j~ N N N ~ N N ~ ~ LLN € ~asasq s m~m~~~ a ¢ ~ a' '~ "'a "n °d °d Q $~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ N W N N W VVVVVV c m ~ e e != ¢~j¢5 gpg v`3 pcpc iRSSpepeF"Z"1N m m~~ a m~ w n~ g ~~~~w ~~ ~~ i t S a m ~ ~ ~ ~ LL $ y S ~~m~w~g ~8~$~.ooo~FC ~ c E 0 U g~ C L Y C m ~ j S s ~g~ a L~~U ~>~o ~~? E F BTATL CLR7'fFIED REIIYCI~IG t,L~'NTERS All State Paper & Metal 13195 Whlttram Reynolds Aluminum 991 I 6th Street Lucky's (Envtpco) 6351 Haven Alpha Beta/Aibertsons (Envlpco) 9640/9743 Base I,tne DCE [nc. 9529 8th Street Von's (Envtpco) 8775 19th Street Source: Interview with Robin Rutherford, State Department of Conxrvation, Division of Recycling on January 10, 1990. WORKS/WP: RECYCI.ING2 ~ ~/-~ ~~T ~~~ i 1V V i i~ ~v ~~-~-~z _ ~ l~` la W ~v ~~ ~' ~~ _~ ~~ Wlil -- O ~2 ~ J JJ s N ~ ._.-_. l `. C- ~ J v ~ ca tC '. i I O O ' ~ ~~ irvtt rtTi, ,.- _I L. _ ICI-~._~ _ ~~~'. ~, .~ ~ . .~ >~ -.: 1~ xs'r ~_~~ I~~_ I__ a~u~ _ o ___.~ _. .?.i~ I +,7. L _.1~~_ '=! h•ri S~ ~ •.Y~.e._.-zr . i.l ~ _~~ es a IJ alp T _i I 1 ~'-T' ~ 7~ _.- I~ _i~..> i 1 '_.' I I _ ~ ..J tt I I~ ~! I ~ ~ 1 I _ ' a IJ ~~ __._. 1 -- r ---- - ._. r ~, ~~ o P^ ~ .a I b a a 3AV N~A~N~~ C1 -l~i1 y ~~ s-I~. _ I ~ v ~ , ~"-i'h+ ~fNTn s- y A ~ ~ I(1 •I •@ ~ ~ ~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT - DAiE; September 5, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner d~i: Miki Bra tt, Associate Planner SUBdECi; COUNTY REfERRAL 88-D5 - UNIVERSITY CREST - Master Tentative racts, Final Development Plan Map, and various Tentative Tract Maps for 1,293 single family residential units, 6.3 acres of commercial site, 4.56 acres park site, and 7.11 acres school site for University Crest Planned Development Proposal on 425.16 acres of land, located north of Highland Avenue, south of utility corridor, east of Day Creek Channel, with portions west of Hanley Avenue and portions west of Etf wa nda Avenue within the City's Sphere of Influence. The proposal also includes the d ed icatien as permanent open space of 675 acres located within the National Forest. RECDMMENDATION: Support City staff recommendations and direct staff to prepare comments recommending denial of the Universityic.o,. o.c acct ;~, the Seotemhrr ~'+. ±o nn -.:~t ;,.y ui cne uounty Planning Commission. R ACFGROUND: The City Planning Commission reviewed the subject proposal at their meeting of August 22, 1990. By consensus, the Planning Commission fully supported the staff positions which were Forwarded to the County on August 6, 1990 and recommended that the information be fo rw~rd ed to the City Council far review. (See attached Staff Report and attachments.) The a~plic ant gave the Ctty Planning Commission a copy of their letter of Au lu st 21, 1990 to the County responding to the City's comments. (See it tached.) The Pla nn ing Commission reguested that the item be brought back to their meeting September 12, 1990 so that they could re spo nil to the applicant's comments. City staff has prepared comments on the aforementioned letter. (See attached,) ANALYSI i; There are many complex issues relating to this arojec t. [n this report, staff has tried to highlf ght and summarize key issues. Staff t:. recommending denial of the Un iver5f ty Crest project based on four main concerns: ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COUNTY REFERRAL 88-OS -UNIVERSITY/CREST S eptemher 5, 1990 Page 2 o A Specific Plan must be approved prior to individual project approvals. o The density is too high. o Design criteria is inadequate. o The 'environmental Review is inadequate. ~eci fic Plan Must come First. Since there is no infrastructure and no services available in the Sphere area, their provision and financing have been of critical concern to the City. A Circulation Plan, an ?nfra st ructu re Phasing Plan, an Etiwa nda North Fire Management Ptan Ordinance, and a Resource Management Plan have been identified as critical components of an Etiwa nda North Specific Plan. These components will identify the capital improvements needed, costs, phasing, and ff na nc ing alternatives. They will also identify the share contribution which each project must contribute. It 15 crucial that the entire infrastructure package be completed and approved before any additional individual prajecis are approved in the Sphere area. This concern is no less if development occurs in the County instead of through annexation to the City. Unive rsity/Crest Dens itv. for a numher of reasons density has been added onto the University Crest Tract so that the overall gross density is 3.83 dwelling units per acre and three individual tracts exceed 4 dwelling units per gross acre. In contrast, adio ininn tr.~t~ F.y_ .C:fi uy pi vreu ac ur near the County base density of 3 dwelling units per acre. For example, Tentative Tract 13835 - Blackmon/Homestead - west and adjacent to the Ca ryn Planned Community was approved by the County far 3.12 dwelling units per gross acre, and Tentative Tract 13812 - Pulsar/Watt - adjoining to the east was annexed to the City and approved for 2.08 dwelling units per gross acre. Transfer of development rights of I7 units from the 675 acre open space parcel within the National Forest is consistent with the Planning Commission recammenda Lion that re5identtal development above the National Forest boundary must be discouraged. Tyre City has never supported the County's concept of density bonus; therefore, we hive restated our opposltian to the 10% density 6a nus re qua 5t on in the County by Chic nr any appl itant. Also, transferring density from the identified school and park site is inconsistent with the City's goals and objectives, to that the park site is part of the State minimum requirement for the applicant's park contribution. 3 U~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COUNTY REFERRAL RR-05 - UNIVERSITY/CREST September 5, 1990 Page 3 Finally, we oppose the transfer of units from the Crest site to toe University site because the University site i5 too constrained to receive the additional units. Cf ty staff has requested that any proposed transfer of density from one planning area to another in the Sphere area rot only identify the public interest served 6y the transfer, but also justify the ahility of the receiving parcel Lo ab so r6 the additional density. Uesign Criteria. An impur td nt purpose of a Specific "lar is to provide cohesive design cri teriz for the Eti wa nda North area. A design plan has been developed by the Consortium of Etiwa nda North Landowners, incorporated into the draft Etf wa nda North Specific Plan, and reviewed in several Planning Commission workshops. Nhen the Specific Plan is adopted, it will provide guidelines and standards for neighborhood identification, landscape treatments, architectural design, and neighborhood amenities including park and school locations, as well as establish a backbone circulation system for the Etiwa nda North pla nniny area. These design issues which affect the entire Sphere of Influence planning area should be worked out before any more individual projects are approved. Further, the design of the University/Crest tracts has moved away from the design criteria recommended by the Planning Commission. Planning Commis Sinn recommends Lions include interior paseos, curvilinear Streets, and pa seo connections to off-site open spate. Environmental Review is Inadequate. The Planning Commission requested that envlronme ntal issues oe aqa resseu m more aecaii. Fui iuwiny ie a brief summary of major environmental concerns: The Environmental Impact Report for this project was initiated prior to the City and Lounty applications by the Consortium of Landowners for an Etiwa nda North Specific Plan. However, those applications create cumulative impacts which must be addressed by this project. County staff has indicated that traffic issues are being addressed in revisions to the draft Final Envf ronmental Impact Report. As of the writing of this staff report, the "Addendum" to the EIR is no't available for review. o The University Reserve system has identified Their property as an example of sensitive Alluvial Fan Scrub Habitat and fncluded it as a research area for the Reserve System. The loss of this habitat has not been discussed in the EIR. Also, two Alue line streams, indicated on the U.S.G.S, maps, run through the Unfversi ty/Crest sites. The effect of these stream 3y~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COUNTY REFERRAL 88-05 - UNIVERSITY/CREST September 5, 1990 Page 4 closures has not been adequately discussed in the E1R. The responsible agencies for wildlife resources, the California Oepar tment of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and iii ldli fe Service, have not yet commented on Lh is project. A resource management plan addressing the cumulative impacts of development on the wildlife and habitat resources in the Sphere area should be approved prior to certification of any individual project EIR. The appi is ant has taken the position that the application has been filed in the County and therefore, the City- identified Red Hill Fault study zone need not 6e add reseed. However, since the inferred fault runs near or through the proposed school and park site this issue must 6e addressed. SUMMARYICONCLUSION: The University/Crest project is a part of development of the entire Eti wa nda North area. This area has the potential to positively or negatively impact the entire City. To ensure that there is adequate public disclosure and participation fn the future development of the Etiwa nda North area, the City Council has passed Resolutions of Sntent to Annex and authorized preparation of a City sponsored Specific Plan and EIR far the entire area. To continue the above policies, City staff requests that the City Council direr.[ staff to prepare comments for the County Planning Commission recommending denial of the University/Crest project. ~~ n"e°p rUl sJb Bra ull City P ner BB:MB:mig Attachments: Staff Report to the Planning Commission, August 22, 1990 with Attachments "A" - "C" ADDlteant's Letter to County, August 21. 1990 City $ta ff's COaGne nf< nn d°..v..._.~- 1990 "rr"~°"~ > Letter, August 21, ~yg 1111 S yr 1SN1v l.RV ,. V Vt]lvivi\vn ,,v x; . STAFF REPORT ~ ' DATE: Rugust 22, 1990 ' n`~ T0: Chairman and Nembe rs of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COUNTY REFERRAL 68-05 - UNIVERSITY LREST - Master Tentative Tracts, Final Development Plan Map, and various Tentative Tract Maps for 1,293 single family residential units, 6.3 acres of commercial, 4.56 acre park site, and 7.17 acre school site for University Crest Planned Development Proposal on 425.16 acres of land located north of Highland Avenue, south of utility corridor, east of Day Creek Channel, with portions west of Hanley Avenue and portions west of Eti wa nda Avenue within the Cf ty's Sphere of Influence. The proposal also includes the dedica tf on as permanent open space of 675 acres located within the National Forest. BACKGROUND: The subject proposal consists of 1,293 single family residential units, a 6.3 net acre commercial site, a 4.56 acre park site, and a 7.17 acre school site on 425 .io acres of land generally located north of Hi ghta nd Avenue, south of the Los Angeles Department of Nater and Power/Southern California Edison ,~.:,;.,. :e,,. <._ s n, r. ov rt„ et .,n u,teh ,.~.rt..,,< west of Hanley Avenue and portions west of Etiwa nda Rvenue. The proposal also consists of 675 acres of privately owned land within Lhe National Forest in the Day Creek watershed Lo be dedicated as permanent open space (see attached Vicinity Map). The proposal was first submitted to the County in 1988. In 1989, it was submitted to the City as part of the Eti wa nda North Specific Plan. In reviewing the maps, the Planning Commission commented that, in general, lots should become increasingly larger in size north of Highland Avenue. The Commission also supported density transfers to achieve larger lots in the north so long as the receiving parcels within the Eti wa nda North Specific Plan area could absorb density. Dn, cayo rai nrra<inn<, i_i ry ctaff 3dYi9aa the anni it 3nf th afi a General Plan Amendment would be required for the University and Crest properties to change their Land Use Designation from open space to residential and that Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) was the highest intensity of use which would be 3 yy PLANNING COMMISSION 57AFF REPORT CR 88-OS - UNIVERSITY/CREST August 22, 1990 Page 2 consistent with the County Land Use Designation of Residential, up to three units per acre. Staff also advised that the density on the University tracts was too high and the lot sizes too small to meet Low Density development requirements. In February 1990 the applicant submitted a screen check draft Specific Plan to tYie City which reduced all lot sizes by 10 percent. The applicant said that the across the board lot size reduction was the only way they could meet the requirements of the City's 'cn9inee ring Division for 60 foot right-of-way for local streets. On February 22, 1990, City staff informed the ap pi icant that no further processing of concurrent tract map submittals in the Sphere territory could occur in the City until the conflict about lot sizes was worked out. The applicant said any other solution would require a *educ tion in density and that density was not negotiable. City staff repeated that the City's position was that City Standards must be met. with that, the City and the applicant appeared to be at an impasse. In March 1990 Joe Dilo rio met wt th County staff about reactivating the County University/Crest application. On April 23, 1990, Mr. Dilo rio, acting for the Caryn Company and the Regents of the University of Catiforn ia, submitted a revised Preliminary Plan of Development to Lhe County. Soon thereafter, ±he Tentative Maps and Final Development Plans were also submitted to the County. A copy of the most recently revised Preliminary Development Plan, dated August 3, :990, has been included in the Commis Sinn nar ketc nttacnee is the Land Use Plan. ' On May 9, July 2, and P.ugust 8, 1990, City staff provided comments to the County Development Review Committee meetings on the subject applications. Staff comments on the subject apol ica tions are intended to 6e consl5tent with the City General Plan, Development Code, policies, standards, and guidelines, as well as previous direction from the City Planning Commission and Cf ty Council. Staff comments dated August 6, 1990, are attached. During the August meeting of the County DRC, Mr. Di[orio stated that the comments received from the City reflected staff's opinion and did not appear to reflect the opinion of the City Planning Commission or the Cfty Council. Present at the August meeting were Lounty staff, Cf ry s?aff, the applicant's technical team, n representative from Supervisor Mikels office, and a member of the County Planning Commission, Mr. Raymond Ferguson. II. ANALYSIS: Staff's comments include a with a suggested list of conditions concerns. Following is a summary concerns: list of concerns coupled wh tch would mitigate the of several of the major 3So PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CR 86-OS - UNIVERSITY/CREST August 22, 1990 Page 3 * Opposition to the County density bonus of 119 units. ' Opposition to counting residential density and 6o nu5 of approximately 36 units for school and park sites. " Opposition to minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet in comparison to County and City standards of a 7,200 square-foot minimum. x Opposition to shifting lots from the Lre st site to the University site, resulting in densities of more than four dwelling units per acre on at least two University tracts. * Lack of seismic studies far school and park sites which are located within or adjacent to the City's Red Hiil Fault seismic study zone. ' Absence of formal agreements between applicant and County guaranteeing amenities and improvements proposed by the applicant to justify the density Donu s, most of which are located off-site. * Absence of formal agreements by agencies and property owners granting permission for use of property for off-site improvements and amenities. III. NOTICE REpUIREMENT: There is no noticing requirement for a County referral, however, staff did notify the applicant (Caryn Company) and invited them to attend the Planning Commission meet ina. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting that the City Planning Commission review staff comments and dS rect staff to forward the aforementioned comments M the City Council. The Planning Commission should also recommend that the City Council direct staff to forward the comments on to the County Planning Commission in a format appropriate for the County Planning Commission. Re~S t lly to , .~-~-' Br B e Citv P annnr BB :MB/jfs Attachments: Ex hi blt "R" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Land Use Plan Exhi6lt "C" - staff Comments, August 6, 1990 (~J / I,EGE:YD ~~~~~~~~~~ t __>SP NCLUDES AREASETIWANDA E RTH ®2 UNIVERSITY OFCAL~ORNIA/CARYN ~ LANDMARK DEVLPMT.CO. 4 CNENG 5 CNAN6 COMPLeICDANi~civaTlONc; s-[ARYN.R=ti41.C?IE.Q. C=AHMANSON, D=PULSAR 9. E=BLACKMANMOA~ST~D EXISTING CITY SPFff-RE OF INFLUENCE ~ .~ ~ ~.,J ['CEM: UN(VERSITYlCREST PROJECT N ~ w~~ CITY OF CArrIONGA rte, viCINTTY MAP ~. ^ PLANNiP7t~D ION EXHIDrC:..A.. SCALE: NONE ~,w, ,. i...._.~.:i,_,. ~S~ ~... ,.~ 3 CE Grp p_; 4 F ~ti;.ie "~;" - ~- ~i ~ ~ C' /` i %/~ ~ , „,~,,,~ LEGEND 300 SINGLE FAMILY 0 7200 SF =MINIMUM LOT SIZE - SINGLE FAMILY 6000 SF =MINIMUM LOT S12E 9 ! 3 3 i I; ~I „ S • ._ i I CITY SINGLE FAMILY 6000 SF =MINIMUM LOT SIZE ~`~~` PU6LIC (PARK & ELEM. SCHOOL) COMMERCIAL NOTE: REFER TO OEVELOPI.ENT REOULATgN6 FOR DESCRPTgN QF A94VE USES. ,,..... ...._.4 \j ~~~~~' "~"' o~~•~~'~ ITEM: UNIVERSITY/CREST PROJECT OF I~TCfi`P ,CI'UCAMONGA 'Iy PLAN~Ip(~~ DWI~ION TI7LE: PROPOSED LAND USE -`_-+'~i~~{~ EXHIBTT:"B" SCALE: NONE C~~ r~ /~ v r^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOtJGA August 6, 1990 Gretchen Stangl-Charlton Office of Planr ing 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, 3rd Floor San Bernardino. LA 92415-0182 I' ^m o~~r ca,~.r or~a r~,r clxr. so, wr -lay , .;: a. no Caumong, i.iiroram >r.a F:. ru, a-~.,,w SUBJECT: UNIVERSITY CREST PDP N121-49; MASTER TENTATIVE TRACT 14492 (:1NIYERS ITY); TENTATIVE TRACTS 14493 THROUGH 14498, 14522 ANO 14523 (UNIVERSITY); FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAD (UNIVERSITY); MASTER TENTATIVE TRACT 14605 (CREST); TENTATIVE TRACTS 14606 THROUGH 14612 (CREST); ANO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP (CREST). Oear Ms. Stangl-Charlton: If the above applications were being processed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, they would be recommended for denial for the following reasons: I. INADEQUATE TIME FOR REViEN: Revised plans and maps were received on Ju y 23, 1 90. 2. INCONSISTENCIES AMOM6 THE PRELtmtxARr DI aN nD ncv rl norrrr rur Pro oe rtv Limits: Property baunda rtes are unclear. The boundaries on the Pre11m1na ry Plan of Developslent are not consistent with the Tract Map boundaries. For example, arterial and collector streets are net included within Tentative Tract Map boundaries. Property ownership Doundartes are not clearly indicated on the maps. Therefore tt cannot be determined if all, part, or none of Day Creek is planned to be constructed on SCE property east of TT 14493, et al. Scho 1 and Park Site: TAe Master Tentative Tract Maps do not Inc ude the schoo and park sites. At the very least, a separate Master Tentative Tract Nap for the school and park sites should be added to the package of applications prior to approval of arty of the aooltcations. F r~met: The formatting of the subject appltutlons 1s different of r each appltution so that it is difficult or impossible to compare the tract maps to the preliminary ,lid final plans of development. The plans and maps should be consistently formatted to facilitate review and plan checking. EXHIBIT "C" ie.a,n..ww.r ,L..~ wlllum 1 Abunder Cnarks 1 Buquet II ., llenm. L Smut DrWun ~ crown ~/' Oameb I Wnaat Ixk lam {Il I' RE; University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 2 Offsite Construction: Tentative Tract Map 14496 indicates that yrading w~i 1 occur on SCE property north of the site. Tentative Tract 14612 indicates that road construction will occur on unidentified property east of the site. (As an example of inconsistency, this triangle is included es part of area H in the Preliminary plan of Development.) These inconsistencies should be corrected. 3. LACK OF INFOFMATfON. ABOUT RELATIONSHIP TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES. Southern California Edison SCE Metro Titan Water District MWD and an Bernardino Count Flood Control District 8C CD Permission to Pan for their Pro ert he University roperty is virtuaily surrounded by ou thein Californ to Edison power line corridors. Improvemant~ and amenities are proposed for the Southern California Edison corridors and surplus property. Also, grading and roads are proposed to be constructed on Southern California Edison corridors and surplus property. School fac 111ties are DroPOSed t0 be constructed on the MWD easement at the southeast corner of the University property. Written permission to plan and use these areas must first be obtained. Also, City poiity encourages regional trails to be located on existing San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance roads. Private Inholdines: Day Creek Boulevard is proposed to he constructed through privately held parcels south and east of the University site. This arterial street runs through on existing private residence. Provision to acquire right-of-way should be made. Further, the University maps wrap around adjoining parcels to the south and east of Tentative Tract 14522. The Route 30 corridor and Day Creek Boulevard will '.im1t access to Vintage Drive. Although interior street access is Indicated, a feasible plan of development should also be indicated to determine if the access would be adequate. M example of a feasibility study fs included betwen TT 14497 and the school/park site where feasible street access and tot planning are Indicated. Also, it is not clear whether Day Creek Boulevard will be constructed substantially on University owned property or on the Southern California Edison corridor. This location for Day Creek Boulevard in relation to site boundaries should De clarified. Adjacent Prooertr. The Rock Cn h r l hh lid. The subject aDPllcattons are adjacent to the a(i y Lreek Wash on the wst which 1s under a Lounty contested lease to the Fourth Street Roek Crusher. Tne development proposal should discuss its nlatlonsM p to the wasn ~~ Ms. Sta ngl-Cna rl t;n RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 3 area with and without the Rock Crusher. Particularly the fea sib ll ity and timing of ex tendfng roads across the Day Creek Wash should be addressed. Southern California Ed isan Su rolus Prooertv: A Southern California Edison surplus property of 55 acres separates the University from the Crest property. All 55 acres have been offered to the Caryn Companyl Consortium of Landowners for f40 ,000 an acre (Consortium meeting of January 10, 1990). The applfcant proDOSes to use 17 acres of this property to meet and slightly exceed the qu imby requirement of 3 acres per 1000. The land use proposed for the remaining 38 acres should be discussed and a feasible use plan indicated. The use of the remainder for park and open space amenities above Lounty requirements should be considered. Pro ert to the East of the Universtt Site: Tentative Tracts 13527 and 12659 are ocated east of the University site. The land uses for these tracts are sketchy and leave open areas which are not addressed as to use'or access. No feasibility study is provided for the site south of Tentative Tract 12659. Construction and improvement of Hanley Avenue is not addressed. Also, adequate access for the site is not addressed. FAILURE TO MEET CITY PLANNING STANOAROS: It should be noted that snh<ta nt is rot nne n the aroma 1nr rh irh fh~ <nhierf application has Deen suMttted is designated as open space under the City General Plan and is currently being proposed to remain open space under the City's version of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan until an application for a General Ptan Amendment is processed. City stafl invites a General Plan Amendment application which could be consistent with the County's General Plan designations (see item /9). Under the County's intensity of development, conditions reflacttng City Standards have been prepared by the Planning Oiv151on and forprded to you under separate cover. City standards include, but are not 11m1ied to, the Hillside OevelopMnL Ordinance. Also, the City's low density designation of 2-~ units per acre is comparable to the County resldentlal, up to 3 units per acre: an6 Ehat iha City's rery iom density desfgnatlon of toss than 2 units per acro 1s eomparaAle to the County desfgnatlon of resldentlal up to 2 units per acre. S~ Ns. Sta ngl-Cho rl icn RE: Onivers ity Crest August 6, 1990 Page 4 Therefore, it should be noted that City development standards for Low Density areas would require a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet with an average lot size of 8,000 square feet and would not permit a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. And, for the Very Low Density designation, the City standard would require a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and an average lot size of 22,500 square feet and would not permit a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet within this designation. (See attached Comparison of City and University Crest Development Standards.) 5. FAILURE TO MEET CITY ENGINEERING STANDARDS: Condtttons reflecting City standards have been prepared by the Engineering Division and forwarded to you under separate cover. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Road Standards should be required for all streets. Particular attention is directed to City standards for special design streets which require an additional 7-foot average and a 5-foot minimum be added to the ultimate 13-foot parkway for landscaping before reaching the perimeter wall of the tract, e.g., Day Creek Boulevard and Nilson Avenue. (See attached ComDa rtson of City and University Crest Development Standards, Footnote 3.) 6. FAILURE TO MEET CITY DUILOIN6 AND SAFETY STANDARDS: Comments re letting ity vi ding and afety requirements have been forwarded under separate cover. 7. CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARDS MUST BE R OU R D: ondtt ons re eat ng ity o ancho Cucaaonga Ire uifir ia,L aLanrivrua nv re ueen yrvyu vv ~~ Lirv lire viai.r iu vuJ forwarded to you under separate cover. R. WADE DATE DESIGN CRITERIA: The sub,lect applications are inc uded wlthtn the tiwanda North Specific Plan submitted to the County the reek of July 2 through July 6, 1990. Specific design criteria including neighborhood ldentiflcation and subarea design criteria are Included in the Specific Plan. However, none of the sub,lect apptiwttons reference the Specific Plan. The subject applications should be suD,iect to the Spaciftc Plan design crtterta upon aDDroval of that Speclftc Pion. 9. INCONSISTENT NITN THE CITY GENERAL PLAN: As mentioned prey Ou5 y, t a ty rter6 an des gnat On for the Unf varsity property is open space. This designation 1s consistent with correspondence received from the University of CaN fornla regarding the educational use of the Unlverslty Reserve System. it 1s also consistent with the exemption received by the Unlverslty from property tax payments on LAe property which have Deen granted every year sines the property wat acquired in v 57 Ms. Stan y-i-C*a~l :on RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 5 1977. Also, the existing City designation provides a buffer to the County approved gravel mining and cement batch plant operation. This Dotentialiy confU ding land use should 6e resolved befere Droceeding with any further land use changes. A City General Plan amendment should 6e processed prior to approval for development being granted 6y the County. It should be noted that the County General Plan Circulation Map is not consistent wi to the City General Plan Circulation Map. The Lounty's map should 4e brought into the City's map. The County's moo shoo Sd be Drought into consistency with the City's map. Further, more discussions should be held among County staff, City staff, and the applicant to determine oPt imam circa Cation for minor collection streets, including but not limited to, Hanley Avenue. (See attached Street Pattern Study, duly, 1490.} 30. DENSITY ISSUES: City standards for Low and very Low Density Residential development would not permit the density proposed for this pro,iect. 98.0 15 a ~2 the app leant has requested a density transfer of 17 base units plus a Z-unit density bonus. The property is Indicated as having 1lmited development potential under the County General Ptan, t.e., MFIPD-1140, However, this request does not appear to sect the condlttons for a density transfer under the Oevelopsent Code because the Droperty is encumbered 6y physical hatardc. tx,e to the steepness oT the terrain, and the fact Chat a flood control easement w:<rc !h' lower one-third of the property, the actual potential for development is virwa7ly nil. The Forest Service has cowmented that publ{c access should he limite4 and twat no Isprovements to the property sha+uld be permitted. Therefore, if a density transfer 1s allowed, the developiyaentWl9 to iAOUId 6! removed from tehde parcelDaceThe only use remalnlny to the Droperty should ba University sponsortd research consistent with the University Reserve System Charter. Access should be restricted to current mode of access, e.9., undeveloped use trails. The City calculation tar the base density on the 515 acre parcel is 16 units. The ratfonalTZation for granttny a density bonus on the Lranaferred unlts is unclear and should be 4lscussed in the POP. Inedeauete Justtflcatii!_n for Density Bonus: The applicant !s requesttn9 a -Cb Dercent density bonus under Section 88.0515(x)(3) of tAe County Development Code. They do not appear to meet the slnlmum requirements to quality for such e L~>~ Ms. 5la ngl-Charlton RE: university Crest August 6, 1990 Page 6 density bonus, neither in quality of design, or by amenities provided above requirements. However, since Caun ty staff has agreed in concept to the 10 percent density bonus, the City requests that, if the City's objection is not con sf dered and the bonus is granted, that the bonus prcvfded be substantially equitable to the benefit received. Regarding project design, the only thing unusual about these applicati ons is the lack of on-site amenities. This is a barely modified grid pattern of development, It lacks the curvilinear design features of the or. gi ral ccncept plan. T; act interiors have no special amenity features. For your convenience, a comparison of the original concept plan tc the present Dlan, plus a 4h!rd concept suggested by City staff is attached. Lity standards would require a redesign of these maps. Please note the internal pedestrian pa seos and pedestrian pa seos connecting to open space and to arterial and collector streets. At a minimum, the latter amenity should be added to the tract design. (Sse attached Land Use Study and Street Pattern Study prepared for the City's Planning Division Dy RJM Oesfgn Group.) The reservation of land for school and park use is presented in the prelimina ry plan of development, but 1s only minimally addressed on the Master Tentative 14492 by reference to "future school/park site.' There is no language or condition in the preliminary plan of development to ensure this basic amenity package. A 17-acre park site is also discussed, but 15 even more nebulous, because it exists on property that 1s owned 6y ~outnern California Edison and not the applicant. There are references Lo park improvements and to Improvements to easements adjacent to park site 1n order to expand the effective area of the Dark sites. However, there are no conditions to quantify the area, quantify the Level of improvements, or to ensure that park improvements are provided as a condition of granting a density bonus. Virtually all troll amenities are located off-site on easements. There 1s no Lnguage or condition to the plan or maps to ensure construction of these amenities. The first step would be for the applicant to obtain letters of permission to construct improvements from SCE, MMD, and the SBCFCD. Twenty-eight acres of recreation area are identified in the Preliminary Plan of development application, however, only 21.9 acres are proposed for dedicated park purposes. There is no anaiysls of where the six additional recreation acres will be prov 1 ded. 3 ~`7 M S. Stangl-Charlton RE: University Lrest August 6, 1990 Page 7 Also, while this would provide park levels within this planned development greater than three acres per thousand, it is unclear that the three acre per thousand standard will 6e met if the cumulative park requirement for the Et', Wanda North area is considered. To make a determine lion as to whether the gross park requirement for ELi Wanda North is met requires an analysts of the park requirements and provisions in the Eti wa nda North Specific Plan which is Just beginning the County review process. The SCE surplus property is available only as a 55-acre package. The entire 55 acres should be considered as part of the amenities package qualifying this protect for a density bonus. It Ss passible that other amenities such as donation of a school site, should also be considered. Landscape amenities which are provided are no greater than would be required of any other plan of development. There have been oral references to preservation of the 675 acre parcel within the national forest as Justification of the density bonus. However, the University is, in effect, exchanging 165 acres of developable land, which does not meet University Reserve System criteria, on wnich they are Daying no taxes, and which has su bstanttally appreciated in value since acquisition in 1977 for 675 acres of non-developable land which meets the University Reserve criteria; therefore, there is intrinsic value in the trade for the University. ..~ .- revised to reflect the more accurate acreage calculations on the Tentative Tract maps. In the POP, density appears La have been inadvertently assigned to Che park and school site. ikcording to Pat Mcfiucktan, County Development Code Section, park and school sites, as well as comaw:rcial sites, must be subtracted prior to calculating density for a Planned Development appllcatton. In the PDP the applicant is requesting a total of 119 bonus units plus 19 units for transfer for a combined total of 1,293 units. City uleulation, Dosed on the mon accurate tract map acreage lnfonaation, 1ndlcates a base density of only 1,142 units which would yield 114 bonus units plus 17 units maximum for transfer fro. the open space parcel for a combined fetal of i,273 units. (3a attache0 Density Malysis Tables.) Tne County 1s encouraged to review the density calculations. Whether or not the densities era revised, the County 1s also encouraged to glue further consideration to the equity of the value received from the proposed aalenlttes package to return for granting a density bonus. If a density bonus is granted, 1t is ~~~ Ms. $Ld ngl-.Od ~1 LJn RE: Unf ve rsity Crest August 6, 1990 Page 8 requested that the amenities package be firmly tied to the County apOroval process, and also that a stronger amenities package be required of the applicant. made uate Justificat7on for Tra nsferrin Densit from the Crest Subarea to the Univers lty ubarea: City policy desires that density decrease from south to north. That policy is not achieved by these maps. County policy requires clustering to preserve open space, such as preservation/enhancement of the two blue '. ine Streams that rcn th.^ough the 57te. Open space is nvt being preserved on site. Therefore, no benefit to the County or to the City is accurrtng by transferring units from the Crest tract to the University tracts. On the other hand, 1labilities are occu rring by concentrating densities on the University tracts beyond their capacity to receive density. Also, liabilities are occurring by concentrating density on the University tract in comparison with densities allowed on adJo fining property. The future Route 30 Freeway will provide a natural 6arrler of the Victoria Planned Community to the south and Day Creek Lhannel and the Cay Creek Wash provide natural barriers to the Caryn Planned Lomwnity to the west. There is no barrier to property in the Eti Wanda SDecific Plan to the east whtcA is designated Yery Low Density Residential Use. less than two dwelling units per acre. Thus, the concentration of 4ensity on the University tracts introduces a higher intensity land use into an area planned by the Lounty for up to three units per acre and by the City for a Low and Very Low Intensity Land Use of less than two to three dwelling units per acre. lots increase to tncensicy, in turn, creates a pressure to increase the intensity of use on adjoining parcels of land. 11. IWAOEWACY OF THE CONIERCIAI. SITE: The 51ie and location of the proposed comeercla ss tit adequate according to City guidelines for coatmercial developaent. Abetter location would be ad,lacent to the northwest corner of the intersection of the Route 30 Freewy and Day Creek Boulevard. This location would have core visible access and provide a buffer to residential developemnt to the north. (see attached Land Use Study, July, 1990.) Experience has shown that approximately 15 acres is optimal for a neighborhood coeewretai canter. Therefore: City staff would suPPdrt a larger coteeerctal site and oppose a site less than 10 net acres for coeeterctal development. Further, the Preliminary Plan of Development List of Potential Uses Includes a drive-in theater. The aforeatenLSOned use would not M appropriate and should be deleted from the list of pobntlal uses. 3~~ M5. Stangl-Cho rl COn RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 9 Design criteria for the commercial site should he included in the preliminary and/or final plan of development. Design criteria should be consistent with the design for the surrounding residential development and with the neighhorhood design theme in the Eti wards North Specific Plan. 12. ENYiRONMENTAI ISSUES: Seismic Studies Inadeg=ate: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has `dent~~ied the P.ed N1.1 Fault Seismic Study Zone. The DDP places a school and a park site within and adJacent to the fault zone, but trenching studies were limited to a tine approximating the alignment of Day Creek Boulevard. Additional trenching should be required prior to the approval of any plan. Traffic Studies Inadequate: The draft Final EIR references only Kunzm-an~ssociates traffic studies. Subsequent studies have been provided by DKS and Austin Faust Associates which should De referenced in Che EIR. The City recognizes the Austin Faust traffic mltiga Lion measures as adequate to address City traffic impacts. The Austin Faust mitigation measure should be circulated to Cattrans for comment an the adequacy of the regional mitigation measures. Resource Mana ement Plan Not Provided: Two U565 Dlue line streams wt be c used accord ng to the proposed plans of development for the subJect applications. Mitigation measures wilt be required by the California Department of Ftsh and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service but have not been addressed. Mitt anon Nonltortn Dlan Not Provided: The mitigation measures in the shoo d be reviewed for accuracy by alt responsible agencies and a mitigation monitoring plan be prepared in order to establish the adequacy of lmplementatian df the mitigation measures prior to approval of the suDJect plans and maps. Cu 1 t1v I t made wtel Addressed: The suDJect plans and maps an ne u e n an aD0 cat on to the County for a Specific Plan proposing 2,975 dwllinq units. Additionally, an appllcatlon for a 620 unit residential development and golf course Ms Dnn filed in the County which is immediately north of the 31i!e of these appiicatiors. Also, the Rock Cs+!.he..fie is immediately wst of the site of these appllutions. There will be slgnlficant cumulative impacts associated with these and other appltutlons whicA must De adequately addressed prior to approval of this protect. Ms. Sta ngl-Charlton RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 10 Environmental Imoact Report Addendum Unavailable for Review: The County has requested that an EIR addendum be prepared for the subject applications. As of this date, the addendum is not complete and nos not been circulated for review. Failure to Circulate EIR Addendum for Comment: Responsible agencies, including but not lmited to the City, Caltrans, and Cal7fornia Department of Fi sn and Game, and U.S. Department Fish and Wildlife Service should have an opportunity to comment on the adequacy of the EIR in the content of the cumulative imparts of the project. Nnen the addendum is ova tlable for review, the City requests recirculation of the final draft EIR together with the addendum to all responsible agencies for eomment prior to approval for the subject applications. 13. APPROVAL tS PREMATURE: Approval of the University/Crest plans and maps at this time is putting the cart before the horse 1n relation to the Etixa nda Nortn Spec lfic Plan. The aDDl scants for the University/Crest proposals are also applicants for the Specific Plan submitted to the County in July, 1990. The University/Crest proposal is Included 1n the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan includes design criteria, backbone infrastructure plans, and other components necessary for the orderly development of this open and undeveloped area. The EIR for the Specific Plan will address the cumulative Impacts of development xh ich otherwise must be addrmssed piecemesi. It is unlikely that development of the University/Crest property can occur until the Issues raised 1n the Specific Plan are resolved i nclud lno the roed fer a H,u„~i.t ..~.... .c .__..a~_ .~_ required backbone Infrastructure. Therefore, approval of the University/Crest tract should be postponed until the Specific Plan is approved. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on the 13 me,lor Issues discussed above, City staff xou d have recoasaended subsUnttal redesign or dental of the University/Crest proposals if these applications had Deen reviewed in the City. Because it appears as though only minor revisions are being requested by County staff, and the site is 1n the City's Sphere of Influence, Ctty staff has prepared recoaamndations and conditions. I am requesting that they be tncorporatad into the County list of conditions. The City lists include conditions prepared by Planning, Engineering, and the Fire Otstrlet which Mve bean forwarded under separate cover, as well as the attached list of additional conditions uhith .. tl • th i .. ec. a ssuas discussad inchis terser. 3~ Ms. Sta ngl-Charlton RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 11 If you have any ques Lions, please call Miki Bra tt or myself at (114) 989-1861. i re , t Bra e Li ty tanner MB:sp Attachment: Requested Conditions Density Calculations Comparison Comparison of C1ty and University Crest Development Standards Tract Design Comparisons Land Use Study, July, 1990 Street Pattern Study, July, 1990 cc: Sharon Hightower Pete Dangermond Joe Dtlorio Land Plan Design Group 3~~ RECOMMENDED CONDI Ti0N5 FOR: UNIVERSITY CREST PDP WI21-49; MASTER TENTATIVE TRACT 14492 (UNIVERSITY); TENTATIVE TRACTS 14493 THROUGH 14498, 14522 AND 14523 (UNIVERSITY); FINAL CEV ELOPMENT PLAN HAP (UNIVERSITY)> MASTER TENTATIVE TRACT 14605 (CREST); TENTATIVE TRACTS 14606 THROUGH 1461: (CREST); ANO FINAL CEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP (CREST). The P',ann ing Division requests that as a minimum the following conditions be placed on the University Crest Pions and Maps. CITY REVIEW. Applicant shall submit all revisions, plans, and maps to the City concurrently rt th submittals to the County and the County shall allow a minimum of four weeks for City's comment prior to County hearings or action. a. Property Limits: Prior to Planning Commission hearing, clearly indicate property boundaries for all property in Preliminary Pian of Development. All property so indicated to also be clearly indicated and included 1n Master Tentative, Individual Tentative and final Plan of Development. b. School and Park Site: Prior to aDDrovai or may 7~~~teti:: Ha^,:, en to tlv~e ra~T ct la Shall be su b~el tied for the school and park site south of TT 1e497. c. Format: Prior to Planning Coawisslon hearing, revise format of Pre iminary Plan of Development, Nester Tentative Tracts, Individual Tract Maps and Final Development Plan to provide consistency among all submittals. d, Offslte C ns ctton: Prior to Planning Coewlsslon hearing, etters o ntent to permit site alteration and also t0 permit proposed uses must M received from Southern Califarnta Edizon, Metropolitan Nater District, Sen Bernardino Launty Flood Control District, and any other property owner so affected. Prior to issuance of first grading permit: agreements with aforementioned agent/es must be completed and accepted by the Planning Department, and recorded with the County Clerk. 3. LACK Oi INFORMATION ABOUT AELATIONSNIP TO ADJOINING DROPERTIES: a. r rmissi xi u rr rx rnor to vumm~g commission review, a e er o n en a rea n to offslte uses and improvements must be obtained from agT affected agencies and property arners, Prior to recordation of the first TenUtlve Tract Map, signed ~~~~ RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 2 agreements with the aforementioned agencies must be obtained and recorded. These agreements must permit trail improvements, trail access, trail use, park improvement, park use, Landscaping improvement, and fire plan maintenance. The term of the agreement shall be for 50 years with provision for renewal. b. Private tnholdin s: Prior to issuance of the first grading permit, a 1 arterial and collector road right-of-ways must be acquired. c. Oevelopment feasibil itv for Ad ioin ind Prooertr: Prior to Planning Commission review, provide circulatf on access and development feasibility studies for all ad,l of ring properties, e.g. east and south of TT 14522; east of TT 14499, 14491, and school park site; north of TT 14498; north of TT 14496; SCE surpius property between Master Tentative 14492 and 14505; north of TT 14610; east of TT 14507; 14609; and 14610. d. Rock Lru Sher Leasehold: (See Planning and Engineering Division Conditions. e. Southern California Edison Sur lus Pro art Prior to Planning Commission review, provide a deve opment feasibility study and circulation access far the entire 55 acre SCE su rpius property. f. Property to the East of the Un iversity Site: Prior to Plar. ring Commissfon review,~ndicate proposed extension of Hanley Avenue and relationship to school and park site, and also to TT 14497, and TT 14498. Also provide access to park site from TT 14497. cne aroremen tinned access should 6e in the form of a pedestrian paseo. 4. City Planning Standards: (See Planning Division Conditions.) a. Cit Hillside Develo nt Ordinance: Prior to Planning Commission review, maps sha De revised to conform to City standards of development, including, but not limited to, minimum and average lot sizes and the City Hillside Development Ordinance. b. City Development Code: Prior to issuance of first grading permit, pans sha be prepared wAtch meet ar exceed City standards as indicated in the City Code of Oevelopment, City Standard Drawings; and other specific .,a.e.}sls prcv!ded by the City Planning Division. 5. City Endineerina Standards: (See Engineering 0lviston Conditions.) Ctt General Plan Circ i tton Ma rev eM, a maps sha be rev sad to Plan Circclatlon Nap. Prior to Pianning Commission ton form to the City General y Recomme^ded Can;~t~.ors RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 3 h. Citv Aiah t-of-Nov Standards: Prior to Planning Commission review, all maps shall be revised to conform to City Standards of Development, including, but not limited to, right-of-ways for all arterial and collector streets, as well as an additional seven !7) feet average and five (5) feet minimum of landscaped parkway along each Side of Day Creek Boulevard. c. City Development Code: Prior to issuance of the first grading permit, final grading plans, street plans, drainage plans, and landscape plans s•".all be prepared which shall :reet or ex^_eed City standards as indicated in the City Code of Development, Standard Drawings, and other specific material provided by the City Engineering Division. 6. Cit Buildin and Safet Standards: (See Build tng and Safety Division Comments. a. Prior to Planning Commission Approval for Master Tentative Map 14605, and Tentative tracts 14606 through 14612, plans shall be prepared which meet or exceed the requirements of the City Hillside Development Ordinance. b. Prior to Planning Commission approval for TT 14496, plans shall be prepared wnich meet or exceed the requirements of the City Hillside Development Ordinance. c. Prior to izsuance of the first building permit for each tract, plans shall be prepared which shall meet or exceed Lity standards as indicated by the City Code of Development, City Standard Drawings, ono other sped nc matertais provided by cne Ciiy Building and Safety Division. 7. Cit of Rancho Cucamon a Fir District Standards: (See Fire District Conditions. 8. Oesi n~Criter~ia: In the matter of design, including neighborhood design, landscaping materials, and product design, all final plans and maps shall be consistent with the Etlwanda North Specific Plan as approved. A11 preliminary plans and tentative maps shall be consistent with the draft Etlwanda North Specific Plan Architectural Oeslgn Criteria Section as submitted to the County far review, July, 1990. 9, Cnnfhrayn[e rich Lity General Dlan: The foilowlnq tondittons will bring the ty hero an and the County General Plan into conformance with the proposed preliminary plan of development. a. University Pro2erty: Prior to Planning Commission review, an aDP Cati~ on shaT~e submitted to the City for amendment to the General Plan for Master Tentative 14492 and TT 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523 from open space to Low Density Residential Use. 2-4 units to the acre, as well as for a commercial site of 3~7 Recommerded Co nd:ti~rs RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 4 not less than 30 acres net. It should be noted that City density is Da sed on a gross/net calculation which subtracts acreage for arterial and collector streets. Therefore, the gross/net shall not exceed 3,999 dwei ling units per acre. Prior to approval of the first Tentative Map, approval of the aforementioned Generai Plan aPPi ication shall be obtained. b. School and Park Site Summit Avenue: Prior to Planning Commission review, an application shal be submitted to the City .or Gere ral Plart A.me^.dme^.t for th.< school/park site from open space to school and park site. Prior to records Lion of the first Tentative Map, approval of the aforementioned General Plan Amendment application shall be obtained. c. Southern California Surplus Property (55 acres).: Prior to Planning Cdranission review, an app ication shall 6e submitted to the City for General Plan Amendment for the SCE surplus property from open space to park site and other use to be determined. Prior to aDDroval of the first Tentative Map, approval of the aforementioned General Plan Amendment application shall De obtained. d. Car n Pro ert Prior to Dlanning Commission review, an app ications shall be submitted to the City for General Plan Amendment for TT 14611 and 14612 from open space and low density residential use to very low density residential use, less than 2 dwelling units per acre. Prior to approval of the first Tentative Map, approval of the aforementioned General Dlan Amendment application shah be obtained. e. Circulation Plan: Prior to Planning Commission review or prior to approval of the first Tentative Map, the County Circulation MaD shall be amended to conform to the City Circulation Map. Aiso, the applicant, County staff, and City staff shall confer and determine the optimum circulation design for minor collector streets. Including but not limited to. Hanley Avenue. Tract maps shall De redesigned as necessary prior to Planning Commission review. 10. Denslt a. 675 Acre Parcel: Prior to recordation at the tfrst Tentative Mao. tAe Un~essity of California .°.escrve System shalt obtain clear title to the 675-acre parcel within the National Forest with deed restrictions ax follows: • all development rights are forgone forever; use shalt be limited to research under the provisions of the University of California Reserve System Charter; 3~g Recommeried ~ond!:~a^s RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 5 ' all access shall he limited to undeveloped use trail or trails. b. 55 Acre Southern California Edison Site: Prior to recordation of the ff rst en tative Map, the applicant shall enter into a nu rc ha se agreement wf th SCF far the entire SCE site. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall complete the purchase of the site and submit a development plan for the entire 55-acre site to the Planning Department for a ppro~a 1. Park development for the sate shall to cons intent with City standards for park improvements. Prior to issuance of the 323rd building permit, the 17-acre site shall be deeded to the County. Prior to issuance to the 646th building permit, the applicant, at the applicant's expense, shall complete improvements far 17 acres of Lhe aforementioned park site. Also, provision for park maintenance shall be provided by the applicant either by means of a Homeowner's Assoc iatf on or a Landscape Nafntena nce District. Prior to issuance of the 969th building permit, the applicant shall deed the remainder of the site east of Day Lreek Boulevard to the County. A15o, at the applicant's expense, park improvements shall be completed for the aforementioned portion of the site and provision for park maintenance shall be provided by the applicant either by means of a Homeowner's Assoc tat tan or a Landscape Maintenance Oistritt. Also, prior to the issuance of the 969th building permit, the applicant shall also complete landscape improvements for Lne area west of Day Creek Boulevard and include maintenance by means of a Homeowner's Association or a Landscape Maintenance District. c. Park Site. Summit Avenue (approximately 4.9 acres): Prior to recordation of the first enta rive Map, the app cant shall deed the site to the Counts Parks Department. Prior to issuance of the 323rd building permit, the applicant, at Me applicant's expense, must complete Improvements for the aforementioned park site plus additional improvements of approximately four (4) additional acres eztendtng the affected park atte access the SCE easement to Day Creek Boulevard, all in accordance with City standards for park lmprnvements. {, i, r3 it Aeuniti.a: prier ra rerardatinn of the fira4 T@nfative ract Map, signed agreements with the SCE, MMD, and 58CFCD must be obtained and recorded permitting trail improvement, trail access, troll use, and trail maintenance. Prior to issuance of the 323rd building permit, all trail improvements shalt be completed in actordance aith City Trail Standards. Trail maintenance shall be provided by a Homeowner's Associati^n or a Landscape Maintenance 0lstrict. The Lena of the agreemen. shall be for 50 years with provision for renewal. ~CO~ P.ec ommended Cond'tlons RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 6 Tract maps shall be redesigned to include internal pedestrian trail amenities. At a minimum, pedestrian pa seas shall be provided to connect to open space areas, community trails, and to collector and arterial streets. e. Friar to Planning Commission review, the density calculations in the POP tables shall be revised to reflect the more accurate acreage calculations on the tract maps, and no density shall be calculated for the school, park, and commercial sites. f. Ex DOrt of Units from the Crest Subarea La the University Subarea: Because the negative effects of intensifying use within the University subarea outweigh Lhe positive effects of reducing density in the Crest subarea, no export of units from the Crest subarea to the University subarea shall be allowed. Therefore, prior to Planning Commission review, all maps shall 6e revised accordingly. 11. Commercial Site: Prior to Planning Lommiss ion review, the commercial site shall either be relocated adjacent to the Route 30 Freeway and Oay Creek Boulevard and inc rea sed~to a minimum net 15 acres or shall be increased to !0 minimum net acres and TT 14494 revised accordingly. Prior to recordation of TT 14494, plans for the Commercial site shall be completed in conformance with City standards and shall be consistent with design guidelfne5 in the Eti wa nda North Specific Plan as approved. On an interim basis, the aforementioned plan zhall be consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan as submitted to the County, July, 1990. 12. Environmental Issues: a. Seismic Study: Prior to issuance of the first grading permit, seismic studies shall be completed within the Red Hill Fault Study Zone a5 identified by the Lity. The proposed school and park sites shall be specifically investigated. If evidence of active faulting will prohibit the use of the school site, then an alternative site acceptable to the Etiwanda School District must be found and acgutred Dy the applicant and maps revised prior to recordation to the first tentative map. b. TrTr ff~tton Plan: Traffic mitlgat~on measures shall confform to~-the~- us~t~n kaust Traffic Study. (See Engineering Conditions.) Also, prior to Dlanninq Commission review, Caltrans s~~all review and comaent on the iraffic Nitigatian Neasures proposed by the EiR addendum. Resource Maneaeaknt Plan: Dr1or to tssuanee of the first grading permit, a resource management plan shall he completed with consultation from the California OeDartalent of Fish and Game and the U.S. De Dartment of Ftsh and M1ldiffe; also, 1601 and 404 permits shall be obtained from the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Corps of Engineers. The aforementioned Resource Management Plan shalt be consistent with the City's Resource Management Plan as approved. /~ Recommended Ca ndi :'nns RE: University Crest August 5, 1940 Page 7 d. MitigaCion Monitor ina Plan: Prior to recordation of the first tract map, or issuance of the first grading permit, whichever comes first, a mitigation monitoring plan shah be prepared by staff and/or the enviranmen tai consultant who prepared the EI R. "he aforementioned plan shall establish the adequacy and timing of implementation of the mitigation measures as approved by the Board of Supervisors. e. Cumulative Im acts Discussion: Prior to Planning Commission review, a coma alive impacts shall be adequately reviewed i the addendum to the EIR. Cumulative impacts include, but are not limited to, all applications of development currently an file in the County within the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence, i.e., the Etiwa nda North Consortium of Landowners' application for General Plan Amendment and Prelimtnary Plan of Development for the San Sevaine Mash area; and the Etiwanda Heights Development Corporation Preliminary Plan of Development Por the area east of the Oak Summit proposal. F. Addendum Review: Prior to final Development Review Committee review, the addendum to the draft final E[R shall circulate for review and comment to County staff and to all responsible agencies, including, but not limited to Caltrans and the City. 13. Approval ii mf ne: Final review by the Development Review Committee and subsequent consideration by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors shalt be continued until the first day following approval of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan submitted to the County in July, 1990. The applicant shall agree to this provision in .. .:~ Y. MR:sp ~/ ~~MPAR=SON CSTY AND i.7N2VER3=TY CREST DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RESIDERTIAL LAND USE DESIONATZON CITY I OCPUD STANDARDS VL L Plan. Area A-D ~P1aR.Area E-I LOT AREA Avq. i 22,500 i 8,000 MSn. Net ~ 20,000 7,200 I 6,000 I 6,000 DUS./AC.S~Up to 2 IUp to 4 ~ Up to 3 I Up to 3 I MIN. DD IS000 SQ.I3000 SQ.I 1200 SQ. FT. 11200 SQ. BT. S12E I FT. I FT. ~ ~ LOT DIlm MSn. wiacn Corner Lot Loi Dept Min. Prontage MSn. Flag 8rontage S~TDACxa rant! Corner Side SSde Rear Int.Bd DU/Accry BOILDZNO BIEORS ADILDZRfl COVEAAQE OpEM SPACt (~r~r /2nd.Plr 90AVg. 10Var. 100 150 SO 30 42Avq. SOVar. 27 10/1S 30 30/S 35 23% 2000/NR 65AVq. SVar. TO 70 40 20 3TAVq. SVar. x7 S/30 20 20/S 3S 40% X3000/NR SS MSn. ~ N/R i N/R N/R N%R N/R 28.5AVq. 24.5 MSn. (SSde on Oar. 16.5) 15LOCal 23Co31. S/S 60'>LotS/10 iS N/R 3s 40% N/R 53 Min. N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R 31.5 24.5 Min. (Side on Gar. 18.3) SSLocal 25Coi:. S/S80'>LotS/30 15 N/R 35 {OX N/R e! a 20Avq.1BM1n. I N/R ~ ~" N/R GolUctor~ SBAvq. iSM1n. ~ N/R 1r ai/CI~iYYSUt) N/R Plan Area H 7,200 Up to 2 1200 SQ. PT. SS Min. N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R 31.5 21.3 MSn. (Side on Gar. 16.5) SSLOCSl 25Co11, S/S 60'>LOtS/10 15 N/R 3S 4011 N/R i I N/R ~ N/R Page 1 0! 2 ~~jMPAR2 SON C S TY AND UN= VE RS = TY C RE S T DEVELOPMENT S TAND ARD S CITY ~ DCPOD I STANDARDS i NEIGHSORBOOD COMMERCIAL i COMMERCIAL i LOT ARHA ~ 5 Acres for a Neighbor- ( N/R ~ hood Shopping Center 9,39 gross ac. proposed (with no limitation on (parcels or master plan) ~ requirement. MIN /.OT NIDTH ~ 3CCFT. NiR I MIN LOT ~ I DEPTH ~ 300FT. I N/R I BLDG. HGT. ~ 25FT. within IOOFT. of ' 35FT. ~ (Residential. Other 40FT. LACES 3 ~ Arterial 45' from face of ultimate 20' from ROW (curb. Parking 30'. Land- (Parking N/R. Land- 3~scapinq 45Avq.w/30'MSn. escaping N/R~ Collector/ i Local St. I35 from face of ultimate N/R !curb. Parking 25'. Land- N/R jscaping 35Avg.w/25Min, I N/R Ii Rear PL Adjacent to n~.+...~u..o..~:' -.uy.i:~ ce•n,uyi:w iiin iLandscaping. lnterrior i Side PL ' Adj. to Res.~20' Bldg./10' Parking/10 Landscaping. N/R PAREINO j 1/250 GFA ~ 1/200 GFA FOOT NOTES: 1. Density calculations between the City and the County are not the same. The City deducts the for major streets, parks, schools etc., while the County includes these arses for the purposa• of density calculation. .. Setbacks i- .,- City ari miiiured from the Face ei the uitimate curb location, therefore the UCPUD •eibacks were aQjusted aeeordingly. 3. Setbacks in the City are measured from the Face of the ultimate curb with result that along mayor atreet• like Day Cresk an additional 7 tees average 5 feet minimum to the ultimate 13 Soot parkway !or a 6 lane arterial per City standard ( 120' ROW, 94' curb to curb with !3' park- way) needs to be added for landscaping bstor• rsaching the Tract bound- ary wall. On collector streets like Banyon an additional 7' eve rage 4' mSn3mum needs to be added to the 11' wide parkways. ( Gft/CItV$UC2) ~ ~ Pegs 2 of LL 0 a N W 6 U F N 6 W 7 Z J n ~~ F~ d A 0 t4 q 0 Q $ a C qe S ( 9 ti qyyy 8 N C , < U A Q 1 W J= Z p > Z > b ~ ~ pp V Z e ~ n ~ S ~ W ~ ~ F ~ ~ e N W = M m N Fa ("~ b - ~ N 2 y ~j p> O > ~ 2 S Cp O H 2 ~ ~ y ~ ~ _ V ~ a ~ a ~ r <` r U . ~ _ ~ o ^ . I a o u ~ o ~= ; a ls v v J b Q ~ ~ 1~ N v ,~ Y n n Ol ~ N o b A ~ C p r ~ 0 p ~ N O N N ~ h O b a N u ~ I I f r W ~ H tll i V W I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I h N W Q V T Q W 3 ~s E6 C U a 8 g s ~ ~ N N=, a ( W N Z , ' m m W 4 ~ ~ m ~ 2 ,~ V l E W ¢ u+ m ~ m Q~ 2 c I m m ~ N r tL$ J SN . ~ 6 b N N, A A V ~ ~ p 1U } pt 6 m I F ~ ~ ~ i V ~ C q 1 I X 5 1 J m N N m n m n m ~ . . o ~ O o m m a~ ~ m m ~ n o . n . m m f ~ N m N m N ~ N ~ 2 U < ~ m ~ N N n N ~ O n f ~ ~ m U ' ^ ~ n _ m 2 O N m m m n f ' b r V m N U' 1 4 6 m V m n m V V w m r o ~ a u e N m m ~ m LL ( m 1 0 n ' V m m F N m ~ n ^ h m F LL K m ~ C 1 N m m V Q V m N H ~. 6 n N W b m N O n O O t F ~ N N O l~~! m ~ N m m ly i a m m < ¢ ' I R O m q ' m m ' ~ m ^ N 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I a k r a e ~ ~ ~ 3 '' ~ r ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ S 3 ~~ :qi E C n LAND'PLAN DESIGN GROUP - -_~_..-~- August 21, 1990 ;,.,.,,.,,.,i.,.i..~.~~~~,,,,~~,.. PUWo~~N .,, AUG ~3198D pq Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charlton t, jUj~i~~1«~%~' ~'?'s"'' Oma of Plarming ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 3RS N. Arrowhead ,4verue, 3rd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182 RE: University/Crest Job No.: UCP 726.1 Dear Ms. Stangl-Chariton: Following is an item by item response to qucstiorts mired by Brad Buller in his letter to you dated August 6, t 990. Each comment by the City is listed and followed by a rrsponsc from the applimnt. INADEQUATE TIME FOR REVIEW: Revised plans and maps were received on July 23, 1990. Initial submittal oftbe Tentative Tract Maps to the City ofReacbo Cucamonga occurred between September /989 and Mareb of /990 with the Preliminary Development Plan submitted to the Couary, and availab/e for review in April of /990. While other submittals were made to the County as June /8 and Iuly 13, 1990, these contained only minor changes from the original Cify submittals. 2. INCONSISTENCIES AMONG THF, PRELIMINARY PLAN O E DEVELOPMENT THE MASTER TENTATIVE TRACTS. THE FINAL CEVELOPMENT PLANS AND THE iNDMDUAL TRACE MAPS: Proocnv Limits: Property boundaries are unclear. The boundaries oo the Preliminary Plan of Development are not consistent with the Tract Map boundaries. For example, arterial and collector streets are not included within Tentative Tmct Map boundaries. Property ownership boundaries are na clearly indicated on the maps. Therefore, it cannot be determined if all, part, or none o(Day Creek is planned to be constmeted on SCE property east of TT 14493, et al. The Cify shoo/d « fer to the Masser Tentative Tract Map for property boundaries. These ilema Gave hers addressed as of the August S, J9J6 DRC at the County. School end Park Site: The Master Tentative Tmct Maps do not include the uhool and park sites. At the very least, a separate Master Tentative Tract Map for the school and park sites should be added to the package of applimtions prior to approval aCany of the applications. ,.,, ,3 ? 7 94 1Eteeulrve RprM. Suite 150 / Irvina. CalAe0ld 92710 / (711) 474d21N1 /FAX: (714) 471J209 Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charlton COUNTY OF SAN 6ERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 2 8/21/90 Current Master Tenlatlve Maps Inc/ude !hc school and park sites Format: The formatting of the subject applications is different for each application so that it is difficuh or impossible to compare the tract maps to the preliminary and final plans of development. The plans anc maps should be consistently formatted to facililatc review and plan checking. We agree with the Ciry'a eommeata on format chat it is sometimes difficult to compare plans. However, the Coua! v has epeeirc requiremeals that use d/fferoat formats for tentative maps and prc/imiaary/rnal deve/opmenf plans wbic6 we are firllowing. Oflsite Constroction: Tentative Tray Map 14496 indicates that grading will occur on SCE property north of the site. Tentative Trott 14612 indicates that road constroction will occur on unidentified property east o(thc site. (As an example of inconsistency, this triangle is included as part of area H in the Preliminary Plan of Development) These inconsistencies should be corrected. Please note, the Soothers California Edison sury/as property is question is planned to bt purchased by the applicant. Property issues have been addrtsaed since the August 8, 1990 DRC. 3. LACK OF INFORMATION ABOUT RELATIO(VSHIP TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES. Southern Cnlifomia Edison (SCE) Metropolitan Water District fMWD). and San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCA) Pemtission to Plan fc::`.ci:: ~,:....d.. ; nc Universiry rropery rs virtually surroundt~ by Southern California Edison power corridors. Improvement and amenitie:~, arc propoxd for the Southern California Edison corridors and surplus property. Also, grading and roads arc proposed to be copstructed on Southam California Edison corridors and surplus property. School facilities are proposed m be constructed on the MWD easement at the southeast comer of the University property. Written permission to plan and use these areas must first be obtained. Also, City policy encourages regional trails to be looted on rxisting San Bernardino County Flood Control DisttiM maintenance roads. SCE -The applicant is planning to purchase the sury/us SCE property and has received a aaJea agreemene from SClS. Within the SCE corridors, road crosaiaga end use of service roads for trai/a are proposed. Severs/ meetlaga with SCE have occurred sad forma/ approvals are aaticlpated !a the asst twc to three months. T 6e applicant is not opposed fo befog coadltlaaed for these approve/s prior to the reeordat/on of Final Msps. MWD -They have received our plans sad conceptually agree to the proposed use. i, ~ ~ ~~ Ms. Grctchcn Stangi-Chadlon COUNTY OP SAN 6ERNARDUlO ucp nh.l 1'agc 3 821/90 Regional Tralla - WI// be addressed further as parr of the Etiwanda North SpecfUc P/an. !! is latended to utilize existing service roads as regional trails. This is Idenfired is fhe Final Development Plan. Private Inholdina~; Day Creek Boulevard is proposed to be constructed through privately held paresis south and east of the University site. Thisartcrial street runs through on existing private residence. Provision to acquire right-o( way should be made. We agree with this comment end are moving forward on this cflart. Further, the University maps wrap around adjoining parcels to the south and east of Tentative Tract (4522. The Route 30 cortidor and Day Crack Boulevard will limit access to Vintage Drive. Although interior streetaaess is indicated, a feasible plan of development should also be indicated to determine if the access would be adequate. An example o(a feasibility study is included bttwern TT 14497 and the schooVpark site where feasible street access and lot planning arc indicated. Also, it is not clear whether Day Creek Boulevard will be constmcted substantially on University owned property or oa the Southern California Edison corridor. This location for Day Creek Boulevard in relation to site boundaries should be clarified. Refer to the current Meater Tentative Mapa which ladicate Chia ioformatian. n_.. _ '~"" "'" uoa:orard wiii tie constructed complately an University Property. Adiaccnt Pronrrtv, The Rnck ~ her --~~_ se oid. The subject applications are adjacent to the Day Creek Wash on the west which is under a County contested base to the Fourth Sired Rock Crusher. The development proposal should discuss its relationship to the wash area with and without the Rock Crusher. Particularly the feasibility and timing of extending roads across the Day Crcck Wash should be addressed. The effects of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher to aurrouadlag deve/opmeat are addressed by tbat Eaviroameafal lmpaet Report. Wilsaa Avenue erteasion across nay Creek Wass fs coaslstcnt with !bt ~orrni,y's Gcaerai Plaa. Haayaa Avenue exteaaioa is implied by the Couafy'a General Plsa. The Rock Crusher coaditioo allows these roads to cross tbrougb the lease bold area. Ms. Grc(chcn $tangl-Charhon COUNTY OP SAN OGRNARDINO UCP 726.1 Pagc 4 821/90 Southern California Edison Sumlus PfoocnV. A Southern California Edison surplus property of 55 acres separates the University from the Crest property. All 35 acres have been o(fcred to the Caryn Company/Consortium of Landowners for S40,000 an acre (Consortium meeting of January 10, 1990). The applicant proposes to use 17 acrca of this progeny to meet and slightly exceed the Quimby requirement of 3 acres per 1,000. The land use prnpaud for the remaining 38 acres should rx discussed and a feasible use plan indicated. The ux of the remainder for park and open space amenities about County rcquiremcnts should be considucd. Tbc applicant intends to purchase the entire SS acrca. Tbc remaining 38 acres will be designated as oatura/ open apace, un/ess Ibe Eti wands Community Hub does not materia/ize resulting in the 38 acrca to be utilized sa a community level park as part of Ibc Etiwanda Nortb Specire P/aa. The University/Great Planned Development in bnyiog the entire SS acres sad impmviag approximately !7 acrca as well as improving an additional 4-S acre part nett to the school, wiD absorb dollars per unit approximately !wo times as high as the City park fee. In addition, Ibis protect pravidea a S acre 1,000 population park standard excecdiog by near/y 70% the Clty park requirement of 3 acres per 1,000 population. Prooertv to the East of the Universirv S'te: Tentative tracts 13529 and 12659 arc located east oCthe University sits The land usa for these tracts are sketchy and leave open areas which are not addressed as to use or acceec. No feasibility study is provided for the site south of Tentative Tract 12659. Conslmction and improvement of Hanley Avenue is not addressed. Also, adequate access for the site is not addressed. The City raises questions about certain races which are oat a part of this application. Asaley Avenue is sot needed for access to the project tracts. Illlan/ey is provided, tben the street crossing !hc SCE corridor from Day Creek fa sot needed. 4, FAILURE TO MEET ITY P ANNIN T A G should be noted that substantial ponioru of the area for which the subJea applications has been submitted is designated as open space under the City Grneml Plan and is currently being proposed to remain open space under the Citys version o(the Etiwanda Nonh Specific PIaA entil an appliction for a Gensml Plaa Amcodmcnt is processed. City staff invites a General Plan Amendment application which would be consistent with the County+s Generai Plan designations (see item 119). ,:.; ~ Sb Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charhon COUNTY OP SAN DERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page S 821/90 The County Gcncra/ P/an has this area ~dcntltied as Rea-3, which is the basis of our plan. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hsa been a wart for a number of years of fhe Unl verslty'a ultimate plan to sell this area for development units ie order (o fund apcn apace acquiailioos as pan of fhe Uoivereity'a :Vafunl Reaaurce System. Aa stated, we ere prepared to submit a i7eneral Plan Amendment aPPIlcatlon as a courtesy, but believe I t more cllicieat to do so wi(h the Etiwands North Speeilic Plan. Under the Count}js intensity of development, conditions reflecting City Standards have been prepared by tfie Planning Division and forwarded to you under separate cover. City standards include, but are not limited lo, the Fiiliside Development Ordinance. Also, the Citys low d<asity designation o(2d units per acre is comparable to the County residential, up to 3 units per acre; and that the Cit}~s very low density designation of tau than 2 units per acre is comparable to the County designation of «sidemi:d up to 2 units per acre. Within a DRC meeting at the County, County staff indicated that this project conforms to the Cify Nil/side standards. Therefore, it should be noted that City developmen standards for Low Density areas would require a minimum lot sin of 7,200 srpmrc fat with an average lot size of 8,000 square feet and would not permit a minimum lot sin of 6,000 square feet. And, for the Very I.ow Density designation, the City standard would require a minimum lot size of 20,000 srryan; Cat and an average lot size of 22,500 square fret and would not permit a minimum lot size of 7,200 tequarc feet within this designation. (See attached Compaison of City and University Crest ueveiopment Standards.) City staff continues to refer to its development code as !be basis far its analysis. This rajecf is a PD and much like the City's Planned Commuditica ~PC'sj, it creates aNndards tailored to the individual sift. In the Etiwanda North treeting hosted by Jon Mikels, Mayor Deania Stout indicated large projects should be )ooFed at oa a case by case basin and sew a(andarda developed that are site specific. The Uuiveralty/Crut Prelim/Dory Development Plan reflects a clustered design generating ao addlfional units than would be achieved by using the City's standards. ;fhe clustered design rellecta the desire of the City of Radeho C'uumonga'a Planning Commlaalon to have a greater varialiaa is /rrt sizes, with lot sizes increasing from south to north. ~ ~/ Ms. Grcichcn Stang4Charlton COUNTY Op SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 6 8/l I /90 5. FAILURE TO Mori rrrv eu ~ -^•NG STANDARDS: Conditions rcBectmg Cuy standards have been prepared by the Engineering Division and (orwarded to you under separate cover. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Road Standards should be required for all streets. Panialar attention is directed to City standards for special design streets which require an additional 7-fool average and a 5-foot minimum to be added tee the ultimate 13-foot parkway for landscaping before reaching the perimeter wall of the tract, e.g„ Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue. (See attached Comparison of City and University Crest Development Standards, Foomotc 3.) A detailed comparisao o! the Cily'e afandarda were made. City standards were used except in a few cases where County staff determined that County Standards were mom appropriate. We believe we meet or exceed City parkway afandarda and would be 6aPPY m review the appropriate plena. 6. FAILURE TO MFp'r rrTV nrm nrnrr• er~.*~ w .-+-,~ „T.. Comments reflecting Gty Budding and Safety requirements have been forwarded under sepamte cover. We ba ve sot received these comments. !o addition, we believe we are meeting building and safety afandarda. 7. ~-~OF RANCHO tcAMONGA F DISTRICT STA 4R M T BF RF~O Iif RED_: Conditions reflecting the Rancho CLcamotiga Firo District standards have been prepared by the Fire District and forwarded to you under separate rover. County staff and Clty staff have been coordiaatiag over the past severe/ months. We wi!/ comp/y with these ataadards as agreed bet weep City and Couoty as we understand them. We would like to cote, this project is within the only CFD of the Raacba Cucamonga Fire Protection District that pays for both !be capita! and operations/ costa at a/eve( aaffafsetory to provide the necessary services. g • INADFQSJATE DE I N ITFOtA; '[7,e subject applications arc included wtthm the Etiwanda Nonh Specific Plan submittrd to the County the week of July 2 through 7uly 6, (990. Specific design criteria including neighborhood identification and subarea design criteria arc included in the Specific Plan. However, none of the subject applications reference the Specific Plan. The subject^appl `cations should be subject to the Spx_ i Bc plan design criteria open =rr =. W .~. u.ai upeiif lc plan. Tbc Float Development Plana Include apecllle design criteria. Such approved criteria will be included info the Etiwaada North SPecirc Plsn. 3~a- Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charhon COUNTY OF SAN OERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 7 g21/90 INCONSISTENT WITH TH CIT1' FP'FRA P AN: As mcmioncd previously, the Cny General Plan designation (or the University property is open space. This designation is consistetn with the correspondence received from the University of California regarding the educational use of the University Rexrve System. It is also consistent with the exemption received by the University from property tax payments on the property which have been granted every year since the property was acquired in 1977. Also, the exisLng City designation provides a buffer to the County approved gravel mining and cement batch plant operation. This potentially conitiaing land ux should 6e resolved before proceeding with any further land ux changes. A City General Plan amendment should be procesxd prior to approval for development being granted by the County. The County General Plan as previous/y noted, indicates Hca•3 for the site. Tbc Uni varsity o(Cali(oroia 6aa, over the years, made several pub/ic ors/ and written statements regarding their objectives (or their properties. We believe the taz ezempt states for the property is appropriate until it is c/eat that the property is allowed to be developed. It should be noted that the County General Plan Circulation Map is not consistcm with the City General Plan Circulation Map. The Countyts map should be brought into consistency with the Citys map. We would suggest tbaf the City match the County's Circu/at/oa Plan. We believe That our traffic reports sad the Cify'a conelode that the County s plan Ia more snurooriate. Funher, more discussions should be held among County staff, City staff, and the applicant to determine optimum circulation for minor collector streets, including but not limited to, Hanley Avenue. (See attached Street Pattern Study, 7uly, 1990.) We wou/d 6e happy fo participate is any (urt6cr circulation discussions. l0. DENSITY -~tpg; City standards for Low and Very Low Drnsity Residential development would not permit the density proposed for this project. We believe we can develop this property at 16e density proposed is the Pre/iminary Development Plaa and meet the City's lof size requlremeofa, although as ladicated is our nrr Plnna comment under item NS, this project is a Planned Development sad bas afaadarda tailored to the deatgn o(tbe project as a whole. /( we were to Gave one coatJnuoua lot size (or a// density areas the project could meet Clty lof size requlremeafa but t61s wou/d provide a homageaeoua and inferior plan to the one proposed. C.) ~ ~ Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charlton COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 8 8/21/90 Inadca~ate Jr cti(ic~tion for Tmnsferrina Density from the Uoocr 67<Acres to the University Subarea: Under Section 88.0515(a) (2) the applicant has requested a density transfer of 17 base units plus a 2-unh density bonus. The property is indicated as having limited development potential under the County General Plan, i.e., WF/PD- V40. However, this rcqueat does not appear to meet the conditions for a density transfer under the Development Code because the property is encumbered by physical hoards. Due to the steepness of the Certain, and the fact that a flood control easement covers the lower ono-third of the property, the acarai potential for development is virtually nil. The Forest Service has commented that public acoess should be limited and that no improvements to the property should be permitted. Therefore, if a density transfer is allowed, the property should be preserved for undeveloped open space and all development rights should be removed from the parcel. The only use remaining to the property should be University sponsored research consistent with the University Reserve System Charter. Access should be restricted to torten[ mods of access, e.g., undeveloped use [cells. The City calculation for the base density on the 675 acre parcel is ib units. The rationalization for granting a density bonus on the transferred units is unclear and should be discn~tsed in the PDP. Development caaslralata on the property are sot sigaificaot. At least 19 Io1s could certainly be developed on the 675 acres (I du/34 acrca). Regardless of the level of development, all the property would be privately owned sad publle access comblele/V illegal. The 67a ....,o wiri uc mamraroea sa permanent open apace. We do cot believe a two ar three wait bonus is return !or the if 7S acre open apace is inappropriate. Inadeauale Justifi®tion for Density Bonus: The application is requatiog a 10 percent density bonus under Section 88.05 (5(a) (3) of the County Development Code. They do not appear to meet the minimum requirements to qualify for such a density bonus, neither in quality of desigv, or by amenities provided above requirements. However, since County staff has agreed in concept to the 10 percent density bonus, the City rcquesu that, if the Cityts objection is not considered and the bonus is granted, that the bonus provided be substantially equitable to the benefit received. Regarding project design, the only thing unusual about these applications is the lack of on-site amenities. This is a barely modilieA grid psttem of development. Jt lacks the curvilinear design features of the original concept plan. Tract intcriots Nava no spcriai amenity fag'\YrGI. For your convenience, a comparison of the original concept plan to the present plan, plus s third concept auggeated by Chy atall'Is attached. City standards would require a reduign of these maps, ~g~ Ms. Gretchen Slangl-Charlton COUNTY OY SAN UERNARDINO UCY 726.1 Page 9 821/90 Please note the intcmai pedutrian paseos end pedestrian pascos wnnecting to open space and to arterial and collector streets. At a minimum, the latter amenity should be added to the tract design. (See attached land Use Study and Street Pattcm Study Prepared for the Cites Planning Division by RIM Design Group,) Tbc project does provide 67S acres of open apace and 21 acres o! parts wbich is aubetantlally in ccceas of any similar amenity in the City. Tbc City requirement (or parFa is 3 acres per /,000 popu/atioa. This project provides S acres per /, 000 popu/anon standard. The interior tract design is a balance of what we perceive to be the City Plxnniag Commission's desires in reference to lot sizes, grading standards asd street designs and bas been developed Gom the initial site design. We wou/d be happy to discuss additional open spacdpasco connections. Severs/ paseos have been added. The reservation of land for school and park use is presented in the preliminary plan of development, but is only minimally addressed on the Master Tentative 14492 by reference to "future schooVpark site". There is no language or condition in the preliminary plan of development to ensure !his basic amenity package. The applicant is willing to be conditioned by the County on the ~rcirmroary Uevetopmenl Plan for the provision o! the school/parir site. A 17-acre park site is also disatssed, but is even more nebulotu, because it exists on property that is owned by Southern ^alifomia Edison and not the applicant. There arc references to park improvements and to improvements to easements adjacent to park site in order to expand the ef&ctive area of the park sites. However, there are nat conditions to quantify the area, quantify the level of improvements, or to ensure that park improvementt are provided as a condition of granfing a density bonus, As indicated earlier, the SCE area has beta deemed surplus end is being negotiated for acquisttloa. This project wt/! acct DarF atsadards as established by the County for parF development. Virtually all trail amenities are located off-site on easements. There is no language or condition in the plan or maps to ensure construction of these amenities, The first step would be for the spplir:ent to obtain letters of permission to constma improvements from SCE, MWD, and the SBCFCD. 3 S~' Ms. Gretchen StangbChadton COUNTY Op SAN DERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 10 Brl l/YO Trails arc shown in accordance fo City Maa(er Plan of Tralle. Tde applicant has ;net with SCE and SCC and aaficipatea approvals for erai/s is the nett two to three months. SBCPCD is not part of the University/Great projectY trail propose/a. Twenty-eight acres of recreation area are identified in the Preliminary Plan of development application, however, only 21.9 acre are proposed for dedicated park purposes. There is no anaiysis of where the six additional recreation ecru will be provided. Ttre curtest proposal is to provide for 21 acres of improved park equiva/eat to S acres of park per /,OO0 popu/sties. Aa additional 6 acres of improved encumbered park land may be provided by the Etiwaoda NOlIb Specific Plaa in ttre SCE corridor adjacent to the University Area actrool/park site. Also, while this would provide park levels within this planned development greater than three acres per thousand, it is unclear that the three acre per thousand standard will be met if the cumulative park requirement for the Etiwaoda North area is considered. To make a determination as to whether the gross park requirement for Etiwaoda North is met r iru an analysis of the park requirements and provisions in the Etiwaoda North Specific Plan which is just beginning the County review process. This project 6aa park afaadards that satisfy and ezceed Clty rcqulrements. !t also wit/ be coasiatent wittr the F.tiwanda North Specific Plaa. The SCE surplus property is available only as a 55•acre package. The emirc 55 acres should be considered as part of the amenities package qualifying this project for a density bonus. It is possible that other amenities such as donation of a school site, should also be considered. This project provides parks in ezcesa of City requirements, provides a 675 acre open apace preserve, and prov/siooa for s school site, all of wtrictr qualify ttris project for a density boeua. Iandsapc amenities which are provided are no greater than would be required of any other plan of developmrnt. Landscape ameaifiea are designed to be a balance between City plaaniag sad Cify engineering. The efliry monument: sad laadscapc provisions are upgraded s/galllcandy from typical (recta. 3s~ ,~ Ms. Gretchen SWngl-Chariton COUNTY OP SAN OERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page I 19/21/90 There have been oral reCerrncea to preservation of the 675 acre pared within the national forest az justification of the density bonus. However, the University is, in effect, exchanging 165 acres of developable land, which does not meet University Reserve System criteria, on which they arc paying no taxes, and which has substantially appreciated in value since acquisition in 1977 for 675 acres of non-developable land which meets the Univemiry Reserve criteria; therefore, !here is intrinsic value in the trade for the Univrnity. It should be noted that the density calculations should be revised to repect the more accurate acreage ralculations on the Tentative Tray maps. In the PDP, dcnsiry appears to have been inadvertently assigned to the park and school site. According to Pat McGuckian, County Development Code Section, park and school sites, az well az commercial sits, must b<subtracted prior to calalating density Car a Alarmed Development application. We believe the City is incorrect- !t is our understanding from the County Sfa!l that there are alternate ways of calculating density for these areas. T6ia was confirmed by John McMaias of the August 8, /990 Comfy DRC. In the PDP the applicant is requesting a total o(I 19 bonus units plus 19 units for transfer far a combined total of 1,293 units. City calculation, based on the more accurate tract map acreage information, indicates a base density of only 1,142 units which would yield 114 bonus units plus i 7 units maximum for transfer from the open apace parcel for a combined total of 1,273 units. (Sao attached Density Analysis Tables.) The County is encouraged to review the density calculations. Alter reviewing the eur~ent engineer acreage ca/culatioaa, our dwelllag unit total is slightly under the maximum permitted. Tbc bact up information is ava/la6/e for your review. Whether or not the densities are revised, the County to also encouraged to give further consideration to the equity of the value received from the proposed amenities package in return for granting a density bontu. If a density bonus is granted, it is requested that the amenities package be firmly tied to the County aPProval process, and also that a stronger amenities package be required of the applicertt. !f sorbing else, this project is prepared to psy to the County requirements !or parts and open spacr. two sad a half times the City's rcqulretrreota For sYstcm-w; de impro ycm cn!a of approximately 6.3 million dollars. 3g~ Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charhon COUNTY OF SAN BRRNARDINO UCP 72G.1 Page 12 8/11/90 Inadcauatc lustificalion fo Tmn krrina D r t r c~barca to the .S74iYtl3.tiY ~g4P[sg: Gty policy desires that density decease from south to north. That policy is not achieved by these maps. County policy requires clustering to preserve open space, such as preservation/enhancement ofthe two blue line streams that ran through the sits Open apace is not being preserved on site. Therefore, no benefit to the County or to the City is occurring by transferring units from the Crest tract to the University tracts. We 6e/ieve we meet fhe (.'ity's po/icy of decreasing density from south fo north. There are na correctly ia'entired b/ue tine streams within the project arcs as determined 6y drainage data. The 675 acres open space being preserved is a part o! fbe site. We wau/d suggest City araf! coarrm with the City P/snoiag Commission regarding the benefifa o! out design philosophy o! decreasing density in the north and Increasing density is the south. On the other hand, liabilities an: occurring by concentrating densities on the University tracts beyond their capacity to receive density. Also, liabilities arc occunring by concentrating density on the University tract in comparison with densities allowed on adjoining property. The future Route 30 Freeway wilt provide a namral bonier of the Victoria Planned Community to the south and Day Creek Channel and dtc Day Creek Wash provide natural barriers to the Caryn Planned Community to the west. There is no bonier eo nmrxrtv in th. iu vanua Speciirc nao to me east which is designated Very Low Density Residemial Usc, Icss than Iwo dwelling units per ecre. Thus, the concentration of density on the University tracts introduces a higher intensity land use into an area planned by the County Ion up to three units per acre and by the City for a Low and Very Low intensity Land Use of less than two to thrtt dwelling units per acre. This increase in imensiq~, in cum, creates a pressure to increase the intensity of use on adjoining parcels of land. Density proposed in the south end olfbe alte reflects the County Genera/ P/aa and we 6elleve that with a Oood control chancel and similar density !o the went, fhe highway and more intense uses to the south, and less iatease uaea to the east across fhe 300' wide SCE corridor, the densitlea proposed from a /and use perspective are justified. t • JNADF~UACY "rrt" jK ('ONIMEF;CIAL SITF; Tho siu and location of the proposed commercial site is not adequate according to City guidelines for commercial development. A better location would be adjacent to the noMwest comer of the intersection of the Route 30 Freeway and Day Crak Boulevard. This laalion would have more visible access and provide a buRer to residential developmem to the north. (See attached Land Uu Study, July, 1990.) 3~~ Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charlton COUNTY OF SAN OERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Pagc 13 8/21/90 A commercial wile a/ fhe Route 30 Freeway end Dey Creck Bau/cvard does not wort because of fhe accessary gcomctry of the sire and access problems. The aife location of Banysn Avenue was chosen to impart a greater acoac o! community 6u6 with its neighborhood park sad elementary achoo/. Experience has shown that approximately IS acres is optimal (or a neighborhood ccmmerciai center Therefore, City staff' would support a larger commercial site and oppose a site less than 10 net acres for commercial development. Further, the Preliminary plan of Development List of Potential Uses includes adrive-in theater. The aforementioned use would not be appropriate and should be deleted from the list of pdential uses. We would he willing to increase floe commercial afte acreage but our market research indicates tbat we would do ao at the detriment of the proposed Efiwanda Community Center located ar Wilson aad East Avenues. The drive-in theater bas 6ecn deleted as a permitted use. Design criteria for the commercial site should be included in the preliminary and/or final plan of development. Design criteria should be consistent with the design for the surrounding tesidenlial development and with the neighbofiood design theme in the Efiwanda North Sperific Plan. The Cauaty requires this cnmmercA/ aife to process independently at a later date under a conditional use perm/t. :.~.. r.~n.m non......... Seismic Swdies Inadeanate: The City oCRancho flrcamonga has identified the Rcd Hill Fault Seismic Swdy Zone. The PDP places a school and a park site within the adjacent to the fault zone, but trenching swdies were limited to a line approximating the alignment oC Day Creek Boulevard. Additional trenching should be required prior to the approval of any plan. We Gave aad will continue to aatfafy a// seismic study requiremeara. Tm~c Studie Inad Duerr, The draft Final EIR references only Kunrman Associate traffic swdia. Subsequent studies have been provided by DKS and Austin Faust Associates which should be referenced in the EIR. The City recognizes the Austin Faust traffic miGgarinn measurts as adequate to address tlrty ta^ic u'it fiaela• The Austin Faust mitigation measure should be circulated to Caltrans for comment on the adequacy of the rcgiotml mitigation measures. 3~~ ~.~ Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charlton COUNTY OE SAN UERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 14 gt21N0 The results from the City traMc model match closely with those prcvlaualy proposed by the epplicanf aad represent a commitment two and a hat! timee greater than (hc Cify curready regni«e of eny development. tiesource Management Plan Not Provided: Two USGS blue line streams will be closed according to the propoxd plans of development Cor the subjcd applications. Mitigation measures wi116e required by the California Department of Fish and Gamc and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service but have not been addressed. A resource Management Plan la diligent/y underwa v as part of the E(iwanda North Specific Plan sod fire Cify ~,ia invited to participate. Aa previous/y stated, (bese `blue-line streams" were incorrectly identified according to current dra/nage data. Environmental /mpact Report analysis bas concluded that the 67S ac«s open space is adequate mitigation. Mitigation Monitoring Plan Not Provided: The mitigation muuvres in the EIR should be reviewed far accvmey by all responsible agencies and a mitigation monitoring plan be prepared in order to establish the adequacy of implementation of the mitigation measures prior to approval of the subject plans and maps. A mitigation monltor/ng plea bas been completed ns part o! the ElR. Since dedlcatioa o! the 675 acre open apace is accepted mitigation, enforcement of the mltigatloa will be easy. Cumulative Impacts Inadepuately Add d: The,mbject plazts and maps are included in an appliratioo to the County for a Specific Plan proposing 2,975 dwelling units. Additiomlly, an application fpr a 620 mtit residential development and golf course has been filed in the County which is immediately north of the site of these applications. Also, the RocE Crusher site is immediately weal of the site of these applications. There will be significant cumulative impacts associated with these and other applications which must 6e adequately addressed prior to approval of this project. The Items « lerenced by the Clty are part of the Etiwanda North Spectre Plan or other Coaary development plane aad are to be addressed as part o! that Speeflic Plao. Cnndttioae attached to this sppllcatioa ere believed fa be conaiateat with LSe Specific Plan and a condition may be atdacbed that requires cnmpl/aace catch artier conditloaa developed tram the review olthe Specific Plea. ~,~ ~ ~ d Ms. Gretchen Sungl-Charhon COUNTY OP SAN 13ERNARDINO UCP 72G.1 Page IS 821N0 Environmrntal Impact Renon Addendum Unavailable for Review: The County has mquested Thal an EIR addendum be prepared fix the subject applications. As of this date, the addendum is not complete end has not been circulated for review. The addendum is near completion and focuses primarily on MalYc issues which are addressed elsewhere. 'railurc to Circulate EIR Addendum for Comment Responsible agencies, including but not limited to the City, Calimns, and California Department of Fish and Game, and U.S. Depanment Fish acrd Wildlife Service should have an opportunity to comment on the adequacy of fhe EIR in the context of the cumulative impacts of the project. When the addendum is available for review, the City requests recirculation of the final drag EIR together with the addendum to ail responsible agencies for comment prior to approval for the subject applialions. This project conforms to rcquiremeats of CEQA and alt other applicable rules and regulafioos for preparafioa etas EIR. I?. APPROVAL IS PREM_~]'';ZB~: Approval of the University/Crest plans and maps at this time is putting the cart before the horx in relation to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicants (or the University/Ctest proposals arc also applicants for the Specific Pian submitted :o the County in July, 1990. The University/Crest proposal is included in the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan includes design criteria, backbone inftastmcmrc plain, and other mmponmts nrv~ecwrv fnr the nrdrriv devAnnmr•nt of this nrvn and undrvelnnrrl area. The EIR for Ihe~Specific Plan will address the cumulative impacts ofdevelopmrnt which otherwise must fie addressed piecemeal. It is unlikely that development oCthe University/Crest property ran occur until the issues raised in the Specfic Plan are resolved including the need for a financial package to provide the required backbone in&astroMUrc. Therefore, approval of the University/Crest tract should be postponed until the Specific plan is approved. As planners we would auggert that fhe Iota! plannfng aree estcods from Milliken Avenue at Hlghlaod to the eastern City limit. The City fins been approving developments in that area without any coaaectioa to a specific plan while this application is for an approval that relates to a specific plan. The City should fie iatlmafely familiar with fhe Etiwaada Nodh Specific Plan sad we remain willing to address any specific questions the Cify msy ha vc. ~~/ ~,~ Ms. Gretchen Stangl-Charhon COUNTY Of SAN DERNARDINO UCP 726.1 1'agc 16 8/11/90 Sl7MMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: Dared on the 13 major issues discussed above, City siaf7 would have recommended substantial redesign or denial of the University/Crest proposals if these applications had been reviewed by the City. 6crause it appears as though only minor revisions arc being requested by County staff, and the site is in the Citys Sphere of Influence, City soft has prepared recommendations and conditions. (am requuting that they be incorporated into the County list of conditions. The City lists include conditions prepared by Planning, Engineering, and the Fire District which have Ixcn forwarded wader separate court, as well as the attached !is! of addi!iona! conditions which reflcd the iuua discussed in this letter. The applicant would like to work closely with the City and the County to develop the finest residential community In the Inland Empire, respecting private property rights and the community good. V ry ly y/,o~urs J-rid N"//hD s Hams Pdncipal K~pr Corr 17 __ o_,a o.au. n:... _rn___~_ n.. _______ ,.... ..~ ., ...... ...,e,. Pete Dangemtond, Dangetmond & Associates Joe DDorio, The Caryn Company Sharon Hightower, County of San Bernardino lobo McMaitu, County of San Bernardino COR ChfOn ~C/ August 29, 1990 COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIVERSITY/CREST PROJECT CITY STAFF COMMENTS DN APPLICANTS LETTER OF AUGUST 21, 1990 The following are City staff comments on the applicant's letter to the County dated August 21, 1990. City concerns were sent to the County on August 6, 1990, on the occasion of the County Development Review Committee meeting an the University/Crest project. County staff said they would respond to our concerns, huc no rasparse has been received as of this date. In most instances, the applicant has commented on but not mitigated to City concerns and requests: 1. INADEQUATE TIME FOR REVIEW; As of Lhis date, the addendum to the EIR is not available for review. The applicant has until August 31, 1990 to comply with the County requests for revision of maps and pia ns. The County staff report to the Planning Commis s ion hearing on September 13, 1990 will be circulated on September 7, 1990. City staff will have approximately one day to prepare a re sDOnse for the County Planning Conmfis Sian hearing. This is not an adequate review period. 2. 2NCONSISTENLIES AMONG THE PRELIMINARY ALAN OF DEVELOPMENT, ETC.: Proaerty Limits. County staff has requested map correcciu ua ~:"`.ch ~~^ Aue Friday, August 31, 1990. School and Park Site. County staff has requested a letter from the School District accepting the site will 6e re quf red. Format. County staff has requested revisions which will provide increased consistency. Off-site Construe tfon. County staff has requested reso utfon o' these discrepancies and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to resolve. 3. LACK OF INFORMATION ABOUT RELATIONSHIP TO ADJOINING DROPERTIES: Southern Calf fornfa Edison and Metro^etitan Water District. ounty staff will require letters from Southern California Edison and Metropolitan Mater District clarifying use of off-site property and given Lhe applicant until August 31, 1990 to resolve. ~~ COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIVERSITY/CREST PROJECT Page 2 Regional Trails. County stiff will require letters from Southern California Edison agreeing in concept to use of easements for trails. Rdjoining Parcels. County staff has requested that access to adjoining parcels be shown on the maps and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to resolve. Rock Crusher Leasehold. The Austin-faust Traffic Study will provide a basis to determine the need for road ezten sions. Southern California Edf son Surplus Prooe rtv. County staff has requested Lhat the status of this purchase be clarified and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to respond. Prooe rtv to the East of the University Site. County staff has requested that Hanley Avenue be extended to provide access for property to the east and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to revise the maps. 4. FAILURE TO MEET CITY PLANNING STANDARDS: City General Plan Amendment for University Property. To achieve planning ca nsistency, the City has requested that a City General Plan Amendment 6e filed by Lhe University. This request was first made when the development application was submitted to the County in 1988. Conformity with Hillside Development Ordinance. To begin the review process, the Hillside Development Ordinance regui res a slope anal vsis map based on a maximum contour interval of 2 feet for slopes up to 205. No such maps have been referred to the City from the County. Specific Plan Development Standards. The City Development Code permits standards tc 6e tailored within a City Specific flan. Sf nce there is no approved Specific Plan for the subject application, City staff is reviewing the application as a standard Tract Map application. FAILURE TO MEET C`.TY ENGINEERING STANDARDS: County staff has taken the position that County standards apply unless the applicant volunteers to conform to City Standards. FAILURE TO MEET CIfY BU ILOING AND SAFETY STANDARDS: Copy has been forwareed Lo the applitant. C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARDS: The applicant states that they will comply with Fire District requirements. City staff will monitor County conditions for adequacy. ~~y COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIVE RStTY/CREST PROJECT Page 3 8. INADEQUATE DESIGN CRITERIA: The applicant has stated that the Specific Plan will confe rm to this applic ation.• This is cart-before-the-horse planning. The Specific Plan should be approved first. 9. INCONSISTENT WITH CITY GENERAL PLAN: City General Plan Status. See item 4 above. Un iversity Tax Status. [f the University does not seek a City General Plan amendment, the tax exempt status of the University property since acquisition in i9ii shuuid be researched further. General Plan Circulation Plan inconsistencies. County and Ci Cy staff are wnrki rg toward resolution of the differences in the two circ ulatf on plans. City staff will evaluate map revisions when they are available. 10. DENSITY ISSUES: Citv standards. See item 4 discussion. Density transfer from 675 acre site. Even though the site probably does not technically meet the County requirements for density transfer, Lity staff supports the concept of the density transfer if in fact the 675 acres are permanently preserved as open soace. Density bonus. City staff has not found a provision in the County Development Code Dermitting double counting of the 675 acre site for a density transfer, and also, as justification for a density bonus. On-site park sites. State law requires contribution of a developed park site or equivalent in-lieu fees for a minimum of three acres per thousand. In the City of Rancho Cucamonga and throughout the West Valley area, the granting of tract approvals increases the land value far beyond the ability of acquisition through funds generated by any fee schedule collected on a building permit basis. Therefore, except for in-fill projects, City policy requires contribution of developed park sites as part of the approval process. In the past, the County has approved the collection of in-lieu fees for pa rk5. Ac Lratic are apprdved in the C9vnty, the lack of parks and the inability of public agencies to acquire parks in the sphere area is increased, whether annexation occurs or not. This is an increasingly serious problem which must be resolved. Off-site Dark sites. PromSSes to provide Darks are not contractual. 35S COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIVERSITY/CREST PROJECT Page 4 Off-s5te trails. Gou my staff is reviewing City requests for conditions for trails and parks. Landscaped easements. Since Lhe landscaped easements are intlud ed on the applicant's Final Development Plan, Lhe responsibility is the applicant's and should therefore be conditioned accordingly. L~nd sc ape amenities. There is lack of a basis to review the applicant's statement. County Devzl opment Code. City staff x517 research whether any other recent County proj ect5 have bzen allowed to transfer density from school and park sites. Density bonus value. Transportation fees meet the applicant's minimum requirement for environmental impact mitigation for circulation and shall not be counted toward density bonus value. The minimum legal requirement for parks for this project is 13.56 acres of developed park. This cost shall not be counted toward a density bonus. Densit transfer from Crest to Universit site. The app ica nt has not provided adequate justification for the transfer, nor demonstrated that the receiving area is able to absorb the additional un5ts. Blue Line Streams. 8y law, State and Fed eras wildlife agencf es must make the determination about blue line stream mitigation. Compatible Land Uses. An analysis of adjoining land uses to the University property indicates that adjoining projects have been approved at a gross density of three units per acre or less. immediately to the west, the Blackmon tract was approved at 3.12 units per gross acre. Immediately to the east, the Pulsar/Watt tracts were approved for 2.0R units to the grass acre. 11. INADEpUACY OF THE COMMERCIAL SITE: City staff suggests that the County require the applicant to fund a County contract for a Market study to determine the optimum size and location for the proposed commercial site. Design Criteria for the Commerc ial_Center. Criteria should be included in file Preiimii,0i`y DeVeiv-yn8rd Plan. For example, development standards listed to not require a landscape buffer between the commercial site and the residences. 3~~ COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIY ERSITY/CREST PROJECT Page 5 12. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES. Seismic Studies. The applicant's geologist has stated that the City's Red Nill Study Zone does not need to be addressed because processing is occurring in the County. Traffic Stud County staff has given the applicant anti ugust 31, 1990 to revise the existing study and will make a determination on adequacy at that time. Resource Ma nagement Plan. This is another example of cart-before-the-iio rse pia nning. Until Lhare is an approved Resource Management Plan, it will be difficult, or impossible, for State and Federal wildlife agencies to assess mitigation requirements for this project which is located entirely on sensitive Alluvial Fan Scrub habitat. Mitiga Lion Monitoring Plan. No Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been received by City staff. when it is received, it is anticipated that the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will address all the impacts identified in the EIR as required by State law. Cumulative Impacts. This is one more example of cart-before-the-horse Dlarn ing. This plan cannot legally be conditioned to conform to a Specific Plan which has not been approved. EIR Addendum. County staff is still revising the EIR addendum and has not released a coDY for review. CEQA Gonfo rma nce. City staff will meet with the City Attg rn ey to review whether Lhis project dges conform to CEQA. 13. APPRUY AL 1S PREMATURE: City staff and City Planning Commission review of a proposed Specific Plan and preparation of an EIR have identified concerns which must be addressed before ratfonal development can occur in the Sphere area. Until all the concerns which have been raised, and all the impacts which have been identt fi ed, can be addressed, development in the Sphere area wilt be premature and no further approvals should occur. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council////qq~~~'',, FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Managert,~G~ SUBJECT: ZRF4RMATI02IAL RHPORT Oti 1990 CS118D8 //`` Rancho Cucamonga has been notified that its preliminary Census figure is 99,964. This reflects a significant difference from the 113,340 that was projected. Rancho Cucamonga has until September 17, 1990 to issue an objection. The negative financial impact could ba significant because of lost subventions. The City is in the process of taking the following action: • Meet with Census representative to discuss issues • Issue letter of objection • Poviov h~~~aiv~n r~~~h* ~i•fa Work with Southern California Edison and U.S. Postal Service for unit count and zip code determinations • Explore possibility of initiating a recount • Determine cost for a recount • Determine financial impact Staff will provide City Council with information as it becomes available. Respectfully submitted, JBF/tlr JBF:470 ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 (~ T0: City Council and City Manager L~ FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Grade Separation at Foothill Boulevard and Southern Pacific Railroad, Council Direction to Proceed with Formal Design for Grade Separation RECOMIENDATION: Pursuant to design recommendations provided by the Planning Commission at the August 8, 1990 Commission meeting, it is recommended that the Council concur with the Commissions decision for a Steel Girder bridge so that formal design of Lhe grade separation can be pursued. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 8, 1990, a presentation was made to the Planning Commission regaradtng alternative schemes for a grade separation at Foothill Boulevard and the Southern Pacific Railroad. Staff recommended the use of a new 2-Span Steel Girder Structure because of the extreme skew (61 ~e~~eo<i „s tnp rail rnaA with the roadway. With a steel structure the abutments can be constructed parallel to the roadway. I M S makes the abutments more stream-lined and abbreviated than the open abutments and concrete side slopes required of a concrete structure. N1th a concrete structure at this extreme skew there would be a big gap between the edge of road and one end of the abutment since the abutments would have to be constructed approximately perpendicular to the railroad. Landscaping around the abutments of a concrete structure would 6e difficult. The Commission concurred with Staffs declsion for the use of a steel structure, but wanted the steel structure itself to have some type of facia treatment and/or architectual enhancement ir. order to make the steel structure more estheticaly pleasfng in appearance. However, 1t should be noted, there is a possibility that the Southern Pacific Railway Company may not maintain the structure itself if any type of facia treatment i- installed on the <*_ructure, We are in the process of contacting the railroad company to discuss this issue further. It is staff's opinion that the proposed bridge should be left for the railroad to maintain due to the liability associated wfth the maintenance. 3~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GRAbE SEPARATION SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 2 Therefore, the Commission wants the project to come back before them at some furture time during the formal design of the project in order to review and approve the conceptual plan on the enhancement of the steei structure. Respectfully submitted, ^ ~ A `r i.-n•~- ~~ SB:MO:jh Attachments yr~d l/ ® ® ~- - nnnv nc~cn>,In un r~lrnnrv._.rn S'I'APP 1tLYOlt,'I' _ k DATE: August 8, 1990 T0: Chai nnan and Members of the Planning Coimni scion FROt4; Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer 6Y: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer v~ID vi uT: riru d~ Scpa r3 Lion aL FoetF~il nom. ill n,la rd and ~l11)}'t~PYI~ Paflflf Railroad 6.4CKGR0 UN D: In December of 1987, the firm of DeL euw Cather Engineers and Planners were engaged by Professional Services Agreement to prepare preliminary alternate design schemes for the subject project. Five alternative schemes were discussed and are as follows: Scheme 1: Add Dne Steel Span on Northeast - Unsymmetrical Roadway Widening Scheme 2: Construct New 2-Span Steel Girder Underpass - Synenetrlcal Roadway Widening Scheme 2A: New 2-Span Steel Girders - Unsymmetrical Roadway Lr a.,.,i.,,, Scheme 3: Construct New Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Underpass Scheme 4: Construct New Prestressed Concrete Trough-Type Girder Underpass It should be noted that a replacement project proposing a longer structure was nominated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for consideration on the California Public Utility Connnission's 1982-83 statewide priority list of grade separation or replacement, but because of the relatively high cost, and low train counts, it did not receive a sufficiently high priority position to obtain State matching funds. C ~~L{,:11 noele rd ally hac gn, Py,j ding rnddway Width of 64 fP.Pt nr greater, but at theeexisting underpass it is reduced to 44 feet due to the short span provided by the railroad structure. Foothill Boulevard is deficient in that it only provides four nonstandard lanes on a thoroughfare planned for six lanes. ~~ PLAtJNING CONh1I SSIUNeTAFF REPORT e GRADE SEPARATION -FOOTHILL BLVD. d S0. PACIFSC RAILROAD AUGUST 8, 1990 PAGE 2 The width of the existing underpass limits the capacity and creates congestion as the roadway width is reduced to 44 feet because of the short span provided by the railroad structure. The City plans to widen Foothill Boulevard to a 120 foot right-of-way, six-lane fac111ty (S4 foot curb-to-curb with a 14 foot median) within the City limits. The City has hired a private consultant who is in the process of preparing a Project Study Repor L/Project Report for approval through Cal trans for the widening of Footh111 Boulevard from Grove Avenue to Lion Street. Since the report was completed by DeLeuw Cather several street improvements have been installed, particularly in the southeast quadrant which would seem to rule out the possibility of unsymmetrical widening of Foothill Doulevard, that is, existing roadway to remain for eastbound traffic; new roadway to be constructed parallel and on the north for westbound traffic. ANALYSIS: Based on the report by DeLeuw Cather, recently completed improvements for the southeast quadrant of Foothill Boulevard and less impact with the Sycamore Inn, the alternatives were narrowed to Scheme 2 and 4; Steel versus Concrete Structure with symmetrical widening of Foothill Bouievard. The estimate cost for these structures, including the associated street work is as follows: JVIIC~IIC L - yY,VVV,VVV Scheme 4 - E5,200,000 Tire Steel structure is less costly, fias a shorter construction schedule, and is more acceptable to the railroad than the Prestressed Concrete Trough Section. in addition, due to :pie extreme skew of the railroad (fil degrees to Foothill), the steel structure is more adaptable to landscaping since the abutments can be constructed parallel to the roadway and with proper facia treatment more pleasing in appearance than a concrete structure. The abutments of a concrete structure would be perpendicular to the railroad track, which would be a skew to the roadway, leaving a big gap between the edge of the road and one end of the abutment. This gap or hole would be difficult to landscape. RL V GI'II'IG IIUI111 UII. Staff is seeking concurrence from the Conrnission on Scheme 2 (symmetrical widening and construction of a new 2-Span Steel Girder Underpass), before seeking City Council's approval to begin with final plan preparation. ~~~ A PLANNING COhth1[SSION STAFF REPOP.T GRADE SEPARATION - FOOTHILL BLYD. d S0. PACIFIC RAILROAD AUGUST 8, 1990 PAGE 3 The Oepa rtment of Transportation (Cal tra ns) has recently completed a Project Study Report for the Underpass and is 1n the process of preparing the Project Report. They also recomnend Scheme 2 as the design concept. It should be noted that the concrete structure (Scheme 4) would require temporary falsework over the existing travel lanes which would impair vertical clearance over the roadway and create hazards to vein cuiar traffic due to the temporary timber falsework bents and supports. This being a state hiyhway, Caltrans will object to any construction that will cause vertical impairment to their highway, not to mention the possible re-routir^, or detouring of vehicular traffic (trucks) that exceed the vertical clearance created by the construction. Respectfully submitted, RHM:MO:sd X03 i;~ ^ " " ,. ~ ~, ?',`, : , ~ ~ F; F; . ~i ~ y 1 5.^.^ 1~`t $ ~~ \ ~ II; ~Y i \ ID ' 1 F II , ~~ ~ li j 1 I 1 ~ j III ~~.i~~ {.. 2 ~ ~I~ ~ III. ~I. ._C .h. . f /r4I ~ ~~~I I ~I ~ Ij ll ,,l~~ .LI ~ i i ~ . `. i 'I -..._ a; ,; ii ~,~; I i ~ , l~/~ i ~~ a,, ~,r` "; '~~~ji ~: ~ 'i I ;'~ y I .,~ F~ ~ r jr: a S ,. i ;i~ ~~ J/, i `'I~dA'~ ' ~%i ~' ~f i ~~~~ ,,~% ,r %~ Ai ~~ ~ ;,~~ $~] : ;~.' ZL ,~ ~~ Y ~ ~? , ~.~>~.~~ ,; ~s~. "~ y ~~~; '~ r .. '"`~ ~ III h ss , ~ ~ 9 ~~ T ) 1 I F ] 3 ~~ ~ E~ ~ X E d ~, a .°•~~~yI~ i.~~4F ~. ~tze~ Ol x 3r3, , CITY OF RANCHO C~'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Paul A. Raugeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Discussion of Bus Stops on Haven Avenue REr NDATION: e~ . It is recommended that three bus stops on the west side of Haven Avenua be relocated to 75 feet north of their existing positions and that the striping on Haven Avenue at those places be relocated one to two feet to achieve a wider lane. BACKGRODND This subject was discussed by the City Council on August 1, and August 15, 1990. Those staff reports are attached for your reference. They contain lnfonmation concerning future tmprovements on Haven Avenue and how those improvements will enhance bus stops along the entire street. On August 15, 1990, discussion concentrated on the bus stops on the west Side of Haven Avenue between foothill Boulevard and 11i.Fl ..nA ~~~~~.u. .rN ~~ l=..l.. LA~:L L.~nAI l.. .Af ::. .. .A~ nn storm dratn.+" The council directed that staff Lalk with OmM trans regarding eliminating, or moving those bus stops from Haven Avenue to nearby streets. ST nce that time a meeting has been held with Omni trans officials to explore all poss1b111t/es for relocating, eliminating or enhancing the safety of those bus stops. A number of alternatives were explored and are discussed further to this report. ANALYSIS The bus stops in question serve a route that has been established for ten years, however traffic volumes on Haven Avenue have become much heavier to that Lime. Originally the right lane at the bus stops was 18 to 20 font wide. ('h;rgne rn thn et..ipirg Cn Hatlen AYe^.ue w e made recently to provide maximum clearance to the median so that landscape workers would have as much protection from traffic as possible. The exposure of these workers to the fast lane of traffic was the most critical factor in determining where the lane stripes should go. This resulted 1n the right lane being moved two to four feet closer to the edge of the street, y~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BUS STOPS ON HAVEN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 2 except at Church Street where it was moved about twelve feet. The City and Omni trans examined several ways to increase the separation between busses and the passing traffic, and between passengers and traffic. The following is a summary of these options and the reasons for recommending for or against their use: Option fll - Restrlpe the lane lines to their original locations. Any change in the lane lines would make clearance 4etween traffic and median landscape workers that much less. It would be possible however to avoid lessening that dtstance by a Significant amount by readfusting the transition from old to new lanes to make it less gradual. This action alone would have a minimum effect on bus stop clearances. Dption fl2 -Remove the bus stops. The stops have been estab115hed over a Lwa to ten year period. Some have low usage, but combtning some stops or making significant relocations to them would lengthen some walks, thus zaposing pedestrians to additional heavy traffic. Option fl3 - Construct sidewalks and waiting pads to serve all stops. This construction would Involve a very great expense, probably over 530,000.00 per bus stop. It would still not widen the street, so would not move busses farther away from traffic. All such lnprovemrents would have to be removed in two to four years when reconstruction of the street and storm drain takes place. Option fl4 - Modify Lhe bus route. The use of the intersecting streets for bus stops 1s physically possible, but the bus routes have 1n5Ufflrinnt Yarn armmA •Iroe ~~ .d.l •~.. ~~..- ___..__.... e. .. two miles required to go around the blocks. The available time at the end of the route now Ts only 7 minutes, the minimam needed to comply with labor contracts and allow recovery from delays. Alternatively, the use of Hermosa Avenue for the south bound leg of the route would add over one half mile to the walk for many of the users now coming from east of Haven Avenue. Option fly - Relocate the Dus stops in the same vicinity. The three busiest stops, near 19th Street, Victoria Street, and Base Line Road, could be moved 75 feet farther north and combined with minor adJustment in the lane stripe providing 19 to 20 feet of right lane. This would both shorten the walk to the bus stop and glue sufficient clearance for the bus to park completely out of traffic. A minor disadvantage 1s that pedestrians would na longer be able to cross the channel to sit down or to find shade witfwuf moving a!ray from t!~ pus slap. CONCLUSION Option fly is the recommended option and would improve conditions at the three motor bus stops over those which eztsted prior to the change 1n the ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BUS STOPS ON HAVEN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 PAGE 3 median. At the bus stops south of Highland Avenue and south of Creekbridge Street, usage is so light that no change 1s recommended. In the case of the Highland Avenue stop, no changes have occurred on Haven Avenue and 1n the case of CreekbrldgF Street, a bridge over the channel provides a large waiting area for riders. At the stop south of Church Street, a widened area to the street is available Immediately south of the bus stop sign. This 1s where busses stop, thus Lhey are completely clear of the traffic lane. Respectfully suhm?tied, SB:PAR:Iy Attachments ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOftT GATE: August 15, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Status of Haven Avenue bus stop safety review RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City staff and Omni trans officials jointly explore options far increasing safety at these bus stops and report to the City Council on September 5, 1990, with a recommended action. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council has directed that the bus stops on the west side of Haven Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Highland Avenge be examined further for the possibility of enhancing safety for bus patrons. AL its August 1, meeting, the City Council reviewed all existing and planned bus stops on Haven Avenue and requested more study into the stops adjacent to the open storm drain. 11 nLt nn M Sn ~.. L..A ut ..a ..tK b.~Ja vi u' options in further detail and to see if any City actlons~could help~in making route modifications feasible. Qnnitrans may need time to develop such alternatives, but it is expected that a firm recommendation tan be made on September 5, 1990. Respectfully submitted, ~+T~"x YOB"'` SB:PAR:Iy ~DO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFI'' ItL+'I'UItT DATE: August 1, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil EngineerY~lr/- 5UB~ECT: Bus stops on Haven Avenue RECOMiENDATION: Since considerable street improvements on Haven Avenue are pi armed to be constructed in the next 4 or 5 years, any temporary solutions to existing bus stops are not recommended. BACKGROUND: Reference is made to City Council/Commission Service contact form, dated April 23, 1990, letter to City from Omnitrans, dated May 1, 1990, and memorandum from Russell Maguire, City Engineer to Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, dated May 21, L 90, (all at*.ached}, the memorandum of May 21, 1990, suggests an interim solution to existing problems encountered by bus riders due to an existing drainage ditch along the west side of Haven Avenue from Church Street to Ni ahl and Avenna. ANALYSIS: Our ultimate goal for bus bays on Haven Avenue beginning at the City's south City limits (4th Street) and proceeding northward to future Highland Avenue is as shown on the attached map and as follows: HAVEN AVENUE - 4TH STREET TO NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD -FIRM SCHEDULE Project Haven Avenue Rehabilitation and Widening-4th Street to south of Foothill 81vd. Haven Avenue at A.T. 8 S.F. Railroad Crossing Improvement Haven Avenue; Street Signal and Storm Drain Improvements Phase 1 - south of Foothill boulevard to north of Church Street Construction Dates fAay 1991 to October 1991 (dates are subject to change since this is a Federal Aid Project and depends on Cal trans review). December 1991 to March 1992 May 1991 Lo October 1991 (Staged construction) (Measure I funding) 7 ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BUS STOPS ON HAVEN AVENUE AUGUST 1, 1990 PAGE 2 Haven Avenue; Street, Signal and August 1990 to ,I my 1992 Storm Drain Improvements (Staged construction) Phase 2 - north of Church Street (Measure I funding) to north of Base Line Road See attached map showiog what is to be constructed (temporary asphaltic concrete bus bay or permanent concrete bus bay). HAVEN AV'eNu`r. - NDRTH DF BASE LINE RDAD TU BANYAN STREET - Project Haven Avenue; Street and Storm Drain Improvements Phase 3 - N/o Base Line Road to future Highland Avenue Construction Dates 93/94 F.Y. (Funding on Lhts phase would be contingent upon awarding Phases 1 and 2, and applying to SANBAG for an advance allocation of funds from Measure [, for design and construction. Haven Avenue; Street Improvements Phase 4 -Future Highland Avenue Lo Banyan Street 94/95 F.Y. (Funding on this phase would be •contingent upon awarding Phases 1 and 2, and applying to SANBAG for an advance V..Y 41 VIi VI IVIIU~ IIUII Measure I, for design and construction. During design of the reach between Base Line Road and future Highland Avenue locations of permanent bus bays will be determined. (See attached map for tentative permanent bus bays.) For the reach north of future Highland Avenue the third lane can be utilized for bus stops since traffic 1s not heavy 1n this area. Respectfully submitted, nHM:MD:iy Attachments ~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 TO: Mayor and Hembers of the City Council FROM: Duane A. flaker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBSECT: CONTRIHOTIOH TO TH8 YNLIIND B•II+IRS DHBIOq IHBTITlITB At the City Council meeting of August 7.9, 1990, the Council was presented with a request to contribute $1,000 to the Inland Empire Design Institute. At that meeting, the four Councilnembars present voted two in favor and two against for the contribution. Request has been made to bring this item back to this City Council meeting so that a full five member Council could consider and vote on this item again. RQSpectfully submitted, - /G ~ ~~? ~ . DAB/tlr DAB:469 U~/ -- CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i i I ~i DATE: August 15, 1990 TD: Mayor and Members of the City Council I FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manage SUBJECT: COMTRZBOTI021 TO IIILAAp EMPIRE DEBIOE IMETITOTE This last year the Inland Empire Design institute (IEDI) was established as part oL the Shaping Growth in American Communitiaa Project. The Institute will serve as a clearing house to provide information to developers, business persona, civic and cultural institutions and private citizens regarding architectural design and planning assistance. The purpose for the formation of the Institute is to help facilitate quality design Lor the Inland • Empire region. The Institute is now prepared to start up and is seeking approxi- mately $50,000 in start up coats neceaeary to begin operation. These start up Lunde arw h.ia.. o,.,,..~.~ ~....., .._ .. Measure I BIA, '~~- ---- ""` `~ "I' "`ir°, prominent area developers and the architectural and planning prolesaional aaaociationa. of the $50,000 start up costa, the Institute is seeking $10,000 from the County and $10,000 collectively from arse cities. Thus, a contribution of $1,000 is being requested of Rancho Cucamonga. DAB:tlr DAB:766 s ~,~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF AEPOBT September 5, 1990 Mayer and Members of the r_i<y Council Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN WORK FOR POLICE VEIiICLES BACKGROUND: Recently the City Council has been discussing to change the graphics and colors of the current Sheriff vehicles sc that they reflect City of Rancho Cucamonga Police identification. McAllister Design has submitted a proposal for C consideration to develop preliminary and final d Council review and approval. The proposal also working with the County to insure that implement graphic design and colors are applied correctly. The total coat for the preparation of preliminary and final designs is $615.00. This would include graphics for the ..w4 4nr.l. n.. ri ~L.ln ni MAn .rn ~.~..ln ~/!3 ~~llister-' rrr_DESIGN~ +n00YJy„r~, cemr o ~ro+n+ . i P~ ... rn o+~o. 521 N. Mo~~a~~,'S~51Suite R Upland, CA 91786 project Police Car Graphics COST ESTIMATE Dote: 8/6/90 ClienC City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ 7oa Design through artwork for City POLICE cars (Sheriff j. Estimate includes 2 preliminary designs for front, back and aide of vehicle and 1 finished comp, all three views. Also includes interfacing with San Bernardino County vendor for implementation of graphics. Consultation/ Account handling 225.00 Design 300,00 Illustration/ Camera Work/ Typesetting 90.00 Total 615,00 Client kAll be rW1Kretl of any an0 all atltlttbnal cosh incurtetl aW rp progress tlue to chanpes/attemtions a adtlitions Wclient at above criteria All estirtwles are wblect to a 105 plus a minus wriance aritl are wbject to a JO tlaY commencerrenl. After 70 tlays estinwta mw ba sublact fo review tlue to fmae pica increases. Terms ~Signad authorizotion upon commencement of project. Deposit due 1/2 eeti.-nated coat upon approval of design. 8aiance clue i.vt i5 3aya £rc.^.f appmeai n£ artwork. The client agrees to pay all cost of collection, Includlne reasonable attorney fees if account Is not paid in accordance vAth agreed terms. AUTHORIZATION I nave read the esrlrnate and terms and Hereby auttwAze McPJIlsrer Design to proceed with me prolecr os outlined above. Signah,re Positbn/title / // i/ Date COST ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE SALES TAX WHERE APPLICABLE. t - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager ~l3d SU&IECT: CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN WORK FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEAL BACKGRODND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga was incorporated in 1977. Since that time the City has used a generic seal which indicates the date of incorporation. As part of the City~s efforts to create a unique identity it has been suggested that an official seal for Rancho Cucamonga be designed that is more distinctive. McAllister Design has submitted a proposal to develop a City seal which would be appropriate as a large graphic, such as on all City vehicles, or as a smaller image for legal documents. The proposed cost for preparation of preliminary and final designs, and color and black and white artwork is Si ieF nn yes ~~llis//}},,er-' ~r_DESIGN~ ' Upland. CA G17B6 521 N. Nq~~,~ua.te R Project City Seal COST ESTIMATE Date: 8{6/90 Client City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ 703 Design through Artwork for new seal to be used as City Seal or Logo. Design to be appropriate for large graphic, such as on city vehicles, and smaller applications such as business cards and stationary. Estimate includes 1 progressive comp and 1 final comp. Also includes art for 4 color process and black and white version. Art will be prodt,ced in 1 master size for each version. Estimate does not include ad slicks, color separations ar multiple copies of art. Consultation/ Acc~~Unt handling 225.00 Design 600.00 Illustration/ Paa~¢-up/ Camera Work 320.00 Total 1,145.00 client srgll be norMed a orn and all odtlMbrwl <LS}s Inc,med donna progress dae ro clwnaes/orcemibns a addlrbns bV client a above crilerlo. All estimates are wblect tp a 10.5 pws a minus wnpnce and are wblea to a Ja day commancenrent. Alt& 90 day; estimate may ne subje<i fo reWew dax to ir:sde pace Increafes. Terms Signed outhaizotbn upon commancernsnt of protect. Deposit due 1/2 estimated coat upon approval of design. ~=1=~=e '~"-a nog a.°~ da"'e iium e 7 pprovai of board art. The client agrees to goy all cost of collection, including reasonable attorney tees tf account b not pokl in accordance with agreed terrtu, AUTHORIZATION I how read the estimate and terms and hereby authorim McPJllster Design to proceed wfM the protect os Wtlined Dhow, Signature Posltion/Tltle ~/~ patg COST ESTIMATE DOES NOT IiVCLUDE SALES TAX WHERE APPLICABLE, DATE: August 30, 1990 vaa a air auaava.nv a.,aaa.avnvi,v~, MEMORANDUM T0: Members of the City FROM: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor. ~1 ~11i `+~z~ SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PDLICY EIITENDIN6 SALARY AND BENEFITS TO EMPLOYEES NHO AaF CALLED INTO ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE AS A RESULT OE THE CONFLICT IN P1E MIDDLE T As each of you are aware, the United Sta Les is involved in the conflict in the Middle East. As a result of this conflict, the possibility exists that City employees who also serve as military reserve personnel may be called into active duty. Currently, the Military and Veterans Code requires that the City continue an employee's pay for 30 'ays if they are called into active duty. Recently, the County of San Bernardino adopted a policy that goes beyond the minimum requirement pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code and ba sicalty extends up to 180 days of full salary and benefits, minus any military pay received. Essentially, with military pay and full City pay, the employee znd their family is not penalized while the employee serves in the military on active duty. I am requesting the Gity Council to cons lder adoption of the same nnli ,dnn.ve ~." •h~ r__. a~ ..s ..,.~ °C~~i~~d~~w. I asked Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director, to explore the fiscal impact of such a policy. Jim indicated that the City currently has two employees, z Publfc Works [nspector and a Maintenance Worker, Who are Reserves and subject to be called into active duty. He further indicated that the fiscal impact on the City would be minimal as current employees would be used to cover the work not done by those serving on active duty. Since the crisis in the Middle East is a national emergency, it is only fair that the City of Rancho Cucamonga ,loin in the national effort and su ppa rt the effort in our own way, i feel that by exte ndln9 salary and benefits to employees who are called to active duty in the Middle East, the City will be contributing its fair share to the national effort. DLS/dah y/ 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager~~ SUBJECT: DRD6 AND GAR6 Al1AREHBBB 4RRBSNMITIOHB POR BCHOOLB IR RANCBO CIICAMORGA Staff has been requested to consider giving awareness presentations on gangs and drugs to both teachers and parents of students in our City schools. Presentations could be done by our new D.A. R.E. officer, Jeff Hill, and our CHOICES officer, Ruben Gonzales. During the presentation, Officer Hill can explain the D.A.R.E. program, discuss drugs, give prevention information and advise parents and teachers what they can do to help. Deputy Ruben Gonzales can discuss street gangs and give advice to the audience on what they can do to prevent gang activity. Presentations can be supplemented by slides and display materials for audience view. At the end of the presentations (approximately an hour and a half), the officers can be available for an unlimited time to answer any questions posed by the audience. Should Council concur in the value of such a program, the first one can be scheduled for mid to late October. Respectfully submitted, JL/pr 90-243 ~l 8 - CITY OF RANCHG CiJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 5, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members oP the City C~/ouncil FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager // p ~~ SUBJECT: COMBIDSRATION O! ADOPTING POLICY R8611RDIN0 098 08 CITY COIINCIL CHAMBRRB, PLASA CONlSAENCB AOOIS AND HAVNN CONPRRRNCE ROOM Attached is a proposed policy for the use of the Clty Council chambers, Plaza Room and Haven Room at the new City Hall. Such a policy can serve as a guide to insure the continued availability of these meeting facilities fox' the conduct of City Council, Commission and staff aeetings, and their priority. This is especially important if the city is to unify and centralize all its myriad business meeting activities at the new City Hall site. Racommendatioa city Council consider the proposed policy and adopt or amend as appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam, AICP City Manager JL/pr 90-245 yf 9 POLICY RE0IIRDIEO DBE 07 CITY COOMCIL C811MBER8 PL71E11 ROOM. 71ED HAVSti ROOK 1. The City Council Chambers, Plaza Room and Haven Room (hereinafter referred to as facilities) shall be used exclu- sively for the conduct of official City business by the City Council, its commissions, committees and subcommittees and City staff unless otherwise authorized by City Council action. 2. City Council shall have priority use of the facilities in the event of multiple meeting requests by City~s commis- sions, committees, subcommittees or City staff. 3. On occasions, when the facilities are not used for the conduct of activities listed above. the followin0 use may be authorized: A. The facilities may be available for use for non-recurring meetings by governmental orgariza- tions specifically hosted by the City; i.e. Senate hearings, League of California Cities, joint powers agencies, other governmental committees. B. The facilities may be available for other acti- vities or events that City council may want to hoot or sponsor. Such spacial events or activities shall apecif icelly be authorized by city Council action. y~o 4. The City Manager shall have the authority to authorize and host the following activities in the facilities, pro- vided that these do not conflict with other business meeting needs of the City as described in Policy No. 1: A. Non-recurring meetings of professional organiza- tions affiliated with the City through the member- ship of City staff. B. The occasional events affiliated with public edu- cational classes dealing with education or train- ing of students in the rudiments of local govern- went such as: student government day, school tours, or events with direct participation by City Staff in their official canarif ias fnsrArinr greater understanding of local government. C. Educational or training events performed for the benefit of and training of City employees. JL/pr 90-240 7~ Pu61ic Safety Commission Minutes -4- June 5, 1990 D3. Rcl'c P i t P o t P ark' E f t Chairman Boyd stated that since Commissioner quintana had brought up this issue and she was unable to attend tonight, he would like to continue this item to the Ju 1y meeting. Chairman Beyd asked if there were any members of the public present for this item. There was no response. Chairman Boyd stated the recommendation was to conduct a study on the legality, feasibility and effectiveness of Che Police Department enforcing permit parking violations on public schcol grounds. Me stated he would like to see an additional recommendation that establishes the policy whereby the City could have the School District enforce their own parking on school grounds instead of using City Police personnel. ACTION: Item continued to the July 3, 1990 meeting. w K • • • w E. COlD1UNICATIONS PAON TSS P L C E1. Cathy Stanford statetl it was very hard to access San Bernardino Road from orangewood because of the closeness of parked care to the irtereect ion. She asked if there was a way ^_n extend the no carkine area by the intersection. Chairman eoyd asked the Engineerrng Department to investigate the situation. . . x . F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC EEARINOS F1. RF,VIEw OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINELER ORDINANCE chairman Boyd presented the background information on this item at the Council and Comniseion level. Staff report presented by Chief Michael, Fire District, with asaietance by Jerry Grant, Building Official, Division Chief Almand, Fire District, end Craig Fox, Assistant City Attorney. Chairman Rnyd asked ann~:t the proposed cha.^.g= o _ ve ____......- .,, ,.,,_cte the exception that a local water flow alarm was snot needed^if^you had ^aaemoke detector. He asked what was the purpose of the water flow alarm. Division Chief Almand, Fire District, eteted es the ordinance was developed, a committee was formed metle up of people from the Building and Safety Division, the Fire ,Safety Division, and the building industry, and stated one of the members of that committee was present to address their questions. Public Safety Commission Agenda -6- June 5, 1990 Tim Fejeran, Fize Prevention Spec ialiet, stated the purpose of the water flow alarm was to act as an evacuation device and a back-up to the smoke detector system, and to alert the neighbors if the awnera were not home. chairman Boyd asked why the alarm was to be located on the outside of the house, and if since moat homes have the master bedroom in the back, wouldn't that keep the neighbors from hearing the alarn. Tim Fejeran, Fire Prevention Specialist, stated in NFPA 13D antl i3 R, under 3-6, the appendix states the audible device shall be heard with all bedroom doors C.Je2 ^. a.'... a bedrGO.i~e Jf ue hvue2, aG i. ae placed Oia ii2 Jut 6iu6 iu66ier bedroom wall to•be heard by both ins ids and outside of the dwelling. Ne stated moat tracts are built back-to-back and would probably echo throughout the area. Fie stated the ale~rn would be on the master bedroom or other approved areas, and each tract would be looked at on a case-by-case basis when it came through the planning stages. There .`.ollowed a discussion on the location of the water flow alarm. Chairman Boyd stated on page 29, there is a proposed deletion of section 4-6, so would that mean sprinklers would be required in bathrooms. Also by deleting section 2, would :3prinkl ers be required in small closets. Tim Fejeran, Fire Prevention 5peci abet, stated that ie correct. He at ated they have found that moat bathrooms have combustible plumbing fixtures and combust iblea chemicals under the sinks where there have been incidents of fire start ins in those locations. He stated they were also recommendine that sprinklers be lost ailed in small closets because that ie moat often the place where small childr~sn hide when there ie a fire. Commissioner Yanko~~ich asked if these would just be one alarm required because some residences area very large, Tim Fejeran, Fire Pt event ion Specialist, stated it would depend on the structure, and if it meets tie requirements for audibility. He et ated there may be incidents where two alarms are required due to the size of the structure. Chairman Boyd openec the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Commis eion were: Dan Jackson, w..lliam Lyon Company, et ated they just receivetl their package on this item and felt they did not have enough time to prepare, and asked the Commission for a oont inuance of thin item. gilt Ruh, 9 felt the ^__ should As'.'C Sect a oop:y o. Lhs report to e.. builders in-~the~ City ae a-courtesy ae he did not receive hie copy until today either. He stated he would also feel more comfortable diecuseing this issue if it could be continued. Be then presented information regarding fire sprinklers from a study conducted by Johns Hopkins University and i,ow he felt the coat would impact the homebvyer. Martin Garrick, Lincoln Propsrt See, oleo asked the Commission io continue the matter due to the lack of time to review the staff report. Public Safety Commission Agenda -B- June 5, 1490 Joe Maniaco, attorney for Lewis Homes, stated he had no complaints with the contents of the staff report, but w9a concerned with the validity of the proposed ordLnance. Ne presented information regarding the State Attorney General's opinion on municipalities adopting more stringent codes than the State Fire Marshal, and submitted it for inclusion with the minute e. There being no further comment, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Boyd instructed the Comnieeion on the following points: The Council has requested the Commission review the proposed epecificat ions. xx^hey specifically did not request the Commission to give them an opinion on whether they approved of the idea cr not. Those arguments that have been made to the Commieeicn are made for the purposes of inserting them into the record. The Commies ion's jurisdiction ie to decide the issues based on the evidence as it ie heard and the direction given by the Council. That direction is to review the ozdinancee, and to make whatever changes or modifications or other recommendations ae the Commission feels ie appropriate. The public hearing will De adjourned, and if there ie further testimony as to changes nr modifications, it will be considered at that time. ACTION: The public hearing was continued to June 12, 1990 meeting, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 10500 Civic Center Drive, to allow those present more time to review the information. R R• h t fi I Chairman Boyd called a recess at 8:05 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:12 o.m. ~.. ,~~~~~~.e.e v. wn ~onunraeron present (quintana absent). ~~.. v R h h • • q. COMMISSION BUSINESS - GENERAL LNPORMATZON G1. Reoort on Feaeibilit •oHTBdmuth C urt Program for Rancho Cucamonga. !Tq He Continued ACTION: Item continued to June 12, 1990. • • • • h R G2. Consideration of ootione for Czossi nc Safety Personnel other Than Crossing Guards. !T Be Coptipundl ACTION: Stem continued to June 12, 1990. • R e h • h Public Safety Commission Minutes -3- June 12, 199C Aon 2eibarth stated that ie a real problem and did not know i£ they would 6e able to satisfy everyone's needs, Chairman Boyd asked what if the public safety aspects are different between the different types cf vehic lee, such as boats, camper shells and free moving vehicles. Ron Ze ibarth felt the Commission needed to connider what 1,200 citizens feel, and if a boat ie properly blocked and et able and not a hazard for a child, then the Commission should consider the boat owner's needs ae well as the r2 creational vehicle owner's. Chairman Boyd asked about camper shells ae a safety hazard to children. He stated it was against the law to leave refr igeratore stored outside with doors attached, so wouldn't a camper shell pose the same type of hazard. Aon Zeibarth stated camper shells are not airtight so he did not feel it was the same issue ae a ref rigsrator. He stated if a shell was unsecured from the truck, it should be the responsibility of the owner to see it is properly secured. They wanted enforcement, but also Eelt they had certa-r. right e. There being nc further comment e, the public hearing was closed Chairman Boyd asked Engineering staff to research the sight line visibility for vehicles parked in the front yard area where it can back out onto the street, and what the recommended set-backs are to ensure the vehicles are placed in a safe manner so ae to not block the sidewalks, Eire access, etc. Commissioner Class stated he would like information on what percentage of grade is considered safe for etorang venrcim ..~,. Commissioner Xankovich stated he wou Ld like information on how to properly eecura the tongue of a boat, and how beet to score camper she Lle, Commissioner Quintana Felt it would 6e useful to define the specif is subcategories and the potential hazards that are specific for each subcategory. ACTION: Staff to come back with the abode information, and present information on ordinances from other cities on the same subject, at the August 7, 199D meeting. R• 1 1 1 k Chai vadn Boyd ca L'ed a __.ess at 8:02 p.m. The Commission reconvened at Bn15 p.m with all members of the Commission present. M • k • R R C2. COt7T INUATION OF ADVERTISED PVBLIC RING ON P OPOSED RE DE TI L I E a4j'~EA ORDINANCE. Chairman Boyd re-opened the continued public hearing from June 5, 1990. Addressing the commission was: Public Safety Commission Hinutea -p- June 12, 1990 Bill Ruh from the BIA, 9227 Haven Avenue, who thanked the Commission for the opportunity io come back on behalf of the BIA. He stated he was concerned with the maintenance requirements as listed on page 45. He felt moat residents would not follow the directions because they were too involved. He also referred to an article that appeared in the Dai Bulletin on June 0, 1990 regarding planning fee shortfalls, and felt several builders would not build in the City if this was passed. He also referred to the north Etiwanda area which ie already paying into a Communities Facility District for Fire protection, which ie expensive and adding the cost of residential fire aprinklere would be very expensive for t'nem. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Amodt felt the system was for fire prevention and would help homeowners during response time by the Fire Department. He al eo felt if a parses could afford a $300,000.00 home, they would want to do something to help protect that home. Cortuni eaioner Curatalo et at ed the arguments presented only address coat. He asked if the BIA hoe ever considered if it can save lives. Sill Ruh, BIA, stated that several years ago before he waa with the BIA, ha worked on a system to provide smoke detectors to save lives. Commissioner Curatalo felt that smoke detectors would work for adults who can flee, but what about small children. Bill Ruh, BIA, stated he felt that hoe been looked at. Chairman Boyd stated he would like the Commission to consider the exceptions to the ordinance as outlined on page 41. He stated the proposal made in the at aEf report an page 69 recommends that these exceptions be deleted and substitute with "aprinklere may be omitted from attics, crawlepacee, and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes". Cemmiaeionet We9t was satisfied with the answers provided by Che Fite Diatr ict at the previous meeting. Commissioner Yenkovich stated hie only concern was with the exterior alarm on the ma stet bedroom. Chairman Boyd did not feel that aprinklere were needed in small closets and small bathrooms with nor.-flammable fixtures and would like to see Exception No. 2 left ', en: ~e alb ly leave in cxcent ion No. t ai s,. Commissioner Amodt concurred with Chairman Boyd. RRR#fR Commiee.ioner Ghee arrived at 7:20 p.m• RRR##R Public Safety Commie aioh Minutes -5- June 12, 1990 Chairman $oyd then referred to Section 3-6 on page 38, which the Fire District was recommending be deleted and replaced with "in moat building configurations, the watez flow alarm shall be located on an exterior wall of the master bedroom". Commiae Toner west felt that might work on small dwellings, but was not sure how it would work on a large house. Commissioner Curatalo felt maybe they could require more than one alarm if square footage was large. .,.`.iaf Sichael, Piro D>et-= t, at atefl Yeu c!vld ;natall ae many alarms ae was felt necessary. Me stated the master bedroom would be moat effective because it was where adults would be at night when people were Bleeping and could assist with evacuation. Me stated they would review the models of new tracts to see how beat to equip the homes with alarms, Commissioner Curatalo felt they should keep the requirement and add in something Chat over a certain square Eootage would have more than one alarm. Tim Fejeran, Fire Prevention Specialist, felt the exterior alarm would be for the parents to help in evacuating. He stated it would be herd to determine a particular square footage requirement for more than one alarm because the configuration of houses various so much. The specifications et ate the alarm mu et be audible at night throughout the entire structure with all appl iancea operating, so he felt it would 6e beet to decide at the time the models are built how many alarms would be required. Chaizman Boyd suggested that on page 69, whets it revises Section 3-6, to delete the exception and add wording that says "water flaw alarm(s) shall be located on an exterior wall in such a location that it ie audible throughout the house a9 approved by the Fire ChieT." The commies ion concurred. Chairman Boyd then referred to page 61, Section 2-8, and stated there appeared to be a consensus to leave in exceptions 1 and 2, delete exceptions 3 and 4 and put in their place the exception noted on page 70, ^8prinklere may 6e omitted from attic e, crawl spaces, and other concealed spaces that are not used or intenLed fur living purposes or storage", and to keep in exception 5 on page 42. MOTION: Moved by Amodt, seconded by West to tlirect the City Atto ruey to develop an ordinance implementing the requirements of 13D and 13R as amended by the Commieaion, and to send that ordinance to the City Council for adoption. Motion carried unanimously, 6-0-1 (Quintana absent). MOTION: Moved by Weat, seconded by Curatalo that the commission recommend to the City Council to adopt the findings of fact as shown on pages 76 through 80. Motion carried unanimously, 6-0-1 (Quintana absent), f ~ f f f f ~ui.~ iY CF RANCHO CUOANi, f' ~~n1ISTR'T!~N JUN 0~' '^r_ Y tioidy View Region '•R~A~IO~Itltt,2~3r~• 6, June 1990 T0: Jerry Fulwood FROM: 9111 P.uh eta RE: Residential fire Scrinklcrs I have enclosed some of the information that I quoted at last evenings Public Safety Commission meeting. I hope that it proves informational. Respectfully, d i i 1<<~ 9LP7 Haven FN•nu•, SWCe PBO • poncho Cucamonga, ColHornlo 91730 • (714) 945.1884 • ipS (714) 948.9631 California Building Industry C ~'~ 1107. 9th SEREE i, SUR E 105n SACRAMENTO. CA 95n 1a PROPOSED RESIOENTIAI SPRINKLER ORDINANCE (S NOT JUSTIFIED BASED UPON LIFE SAFETY, PROPERTY PROTECTION, OR COST SAYINGS. Life Safety Association • rhnnr 1915144 ;~79U Ninety percent of the fatalities from residential fires are related to smoke inhalation and causes other than direct contact with flame. Sprinkler systems are activated by heat, not smoke (which con to ins deadly carbon monoxide, etc. 1. Two-thirds of fire-related fatalities in one- and two-family dwellings are caused by cigarettes igniting upholstered furniture or bedding. A slow, smoldering fire such as a burning cigarette can easily generate fatal levels of carbon monoxide before enough heat is generated to activate the sprl nk ler system. This is why smoke detection (via smoke detectors) is of such paramount importance regarding life safety. to an analytical study conducted by Johns Nopkf ns University it was shown that the most prominent life saving feature in a residential sprinkler system fs the flow alarm, not the water spray. Property Protection The Hopkins University study asserted that choosing sprinkler systems over smoke detectors wou16 only provide an 18E increase in estimated property protection at an increase of 20 to 25 times the cost. From inspection of the existing State Fire Marshal data, the Incidents of fire starting within one of the dwelling's rooms and ultimately resulting 1n maJor property loss would be a good indicatton of where the presence of a sprinkler system might provide responsible property protection. The California data for 1980 shows this type of incident happening only 6.51 of the time. Actual data Is not available 4o indicate what positive difference the presence of a smoke detector or a remote alarm system would Nava r,aue in These cases. Even so, the fact remains that the overwhelming ma,iortty of residential fires starting 1n areas which could be reached by a sprinkler system do not presently result to maJor property loss. in a nationally conducted study of 33,000 randomly selected households, 1t was found that of the 2,643 fires reported, only 61 were actuslly extingutshad by the fire department. In over 901 of the cases the fire had been put out by a household • ' t 4 1 t• " member. This 1s not to detract from the importance of local fire departments but, ••ather, it is an indication that the interjection of residential fire sprinklers Into common use would only mar mall improve fire suppression over this record. Cost Savings data from the State Ftre Marshal for 1983 shows a total property loss of 5127 million resulting from fires in one- and two-family dwellings. ?hart was also a rural content lass of ;40 million from these same fires fora combined loss of ;161 million. Question: What would be the total cast to install fire sprinkler systems 1n all new residential dwellings for the period of one yeart Answer: 200,000 units x ;1,500 per unit ;300 million So, a very conservative estimate of ;300 million for lnstallatlon in new units each year would be required in order to diminish a property loss of ;167 million each year. the cast of installation is double that of the loss:': i., -,•~`k12,3 K ~ ~' , ....~ n„ ~%iC~.. ?1 '~~ .• !~ ~ , ~,, ~ ~ ~_- - _"t,w 'J1 ~~ a~a _ S 'nkler stu' d~y~ Pn Owners rPSist additional costs IrorrNbuyara N~ere ealnd tM wwy P1aMma hdallor Ate aPrh1' kbn - M ddnd fa "N S2.OOD-M pemala raapolMed MeJ wouy not he hlRxaatad, 9urptyypiy. thel rearbx Nvaaaad b 73 panaxa br eBacMd Padrt lypu, each ae IowMCUSaa end N1NOM1~kana. Men Oleabn, 1988 Corleurtarr Alti- tude Study mddiNr, aeld, "New wet ~p eaaprk*bre ue ail arrp• Nly and Brl mach d the rehedarca la elnthuleda b price aenaltMb ee eWdaucedWMgher reMManceMtha mare aTfordehb e8eched product rypee " Culreraly m W 11M year, ale Co11. ale ~ AaMrda 54dy wa NnPaad M daNhq Ir1drMY Research CourlcN born Iraerviewa wnh more men 1.808 IridlvldreN rN1o haw par. ahmed new homes h1 prarya. Ban tlernerdrq, RNelelda end 1k8h San ~y;,,.n.,riiea. iris survey wee aorF I98B end aovMad~ a wide rerlYa of su6bae, blakrdllq where hWara mOVe Irpn, IMh oortaradeg pal. tame, prelarted NnanurlMY ame1Y. nee, art aala.iof and hea11o1 Iealuree. Tno-IaaMnd NpM-paw d 81e 1,880 hanadryar btlarvlavra rwra NIIdIILied b Orariaa CaeaY, Tha raalAd a aw lase Cerrlarlar Nnhrda Study wale praaelaad tl a Naerygt 0~ va1M~ b errarlerael MTeha dhecbr Or- ~ ~~ CauBy &a~r9 Iridlretry AaeodMbn, slew homes ere the bmt . xkey b ha auhyct b Theo. `.RS.. ee.al has ahOwn nrt orw ao per. cerdd eA ar.eooaefn holgkg abck npn Men f0 yeen old. M addltbn, Me oadae br 11ew~1arle OOIUWCIhm ars aNlarray Nn0lelbrbNa and ra+rranlM InchrdemNellectlvs artery mequrea euo11 ae amOke dMxape, era wq esperatlorp erq Bro-reablrye roeelg metedeb," N98ien aeN. "AdAU011Yy, I11e halualry does when ePrM yeele w~~e~ny~Na~a~ reQrlred ~ t)IlaOlm ~^...,.Y ~pde! m adopted bl' IM hdawatlonel Caf greee d BWIdMp 081dad,^ BINOCN RseidefN 8011 BaleraM. cllefadlyaW abr Ioeai addae oaldad arq aWl b llesd Nrrerarrer dMrdrid YM rid Inflela ~• 1aaglMad rapAalbrn on a• ~ hr41 a~9~r1~1aiMIaR 4 Ned. nNis11 o0r1eu1eaa 0o- rtierld aplNldwa r a u1N rlNrpry I•m N1ledara dM r1Wka1 plan wIM ro- spond apprOprlyNy," For more IIMelmanon, ceN 5~7- 9012. jt...,~~- ~~ r.H~,~'a.. ..+ ,~~ ~.;F ., ~..~ I~~~~~ S ,•, ~ aw N C ~ K ~~ T 55e O ~~ ~~ v ~.~~N ~r0~"o e = ~ x 2 C c, fP O ~E ~~ y nx S a'a B~ N ~? c ~ ,; r California Building Industry Association CBf A 1107 91h STREET, SUITE 1060 • SACRnhIENTp, CA y5AI4 • PhpnP Dial •I I l i431 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER OROINANCe IS NOT PERMITTED BY STATE LAN Neaith and Safety Code sections 17958, 17958.5 and 11458.7 prohibit the a doptton and enforcement of the proposed ordinance. Specf fically: Section 17958 allows any city or county to make changes to the State Building Code only if they impose the same requtremen is as are contained in the State Code. Section 17958.5 allows a city or county to make changes to the State Bull ding Code which are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions. Generally acceptable "local conditions" are corrosion and unstable soils, high wind areas, earthquake fault zones, snow and flood zones, and flammable vegetation areas. Interior space of residential bufldings are similar throughout California and are not reasonably related to "local conditions". Section 17958.7 requires the governing body of a city or county to make an express finding that a change to the State Building Lode is reasonably necessary because of "local conditions", to make that finding a public record, and to file that finding and the proposed amendment with the State Department o/ Housing and Coaaalnity Bevelop- ment. No modifications shall Decome effective or operative until the finding and amendaent have been filed. ~« , _,,f~,a; ,,~., . ' :: ~,~{ f•, Iillli.i~iiVC: ~:vi~-1: ~• a~ ,~~ ~~~,,(;Vi, 1603 ORRINGiON AVENUE, EVANSTON, IlUN015 60201 SPRINKLER PUBLICATION "FLABBER~4STED" BY SERIES OF CONTR~~L VALVE SHUTDOWNS k 19 reassudrg IO 999 !1181 lha t1.$. FIRE SPRINKLER REPORTER has fi- nely coma b realize that there are closed sprinkler vahrea out there. In re- cent edhbns. June 1987 and July 1987, they have girrbd articles which point to this problem and stale that they ere "flabbargastatl by the raced cedes of fires in sprnkkred buildings where the main sprinker contrd valve had been shut down rendering ille aprinkbr sys- tem useksss." Thin is treated as ii k were a rrew rauerelxxl. eur, guess wnat r i ms problem has existed fa yeare. The threat posed by cbsed Sprinkler valves has been recognized by the in- surance irAusiry for a bng lima, What dher possible ezplanetion could !here be b the lad that fire in9unxs inspect sprinkler systems as a paA of the blow- up sably arW k>ss prevention programs / for their clients. This Intluatry has kxlg recognized the pdential for tlisealer that existswith the "ckrsed valve syndrome:' In 1982, Factory Mutual published in their periodkal, FACTORY MUTUAL RECORD, en alarming story in which it P` was reported That more than 13.900 im- P " ~ yruperiy ci9sad veives were discovered ~~~~~ ON during in-plant inspections between ^e `~ 1973 end 1981. During that same period ~`, there were 380 fires atFM insured ladli- ties wlkerrf~ ~a were cbeed, reaulling in losses in d f140 mlNbn. A Idlow•tp articleeadrp In a later edl- tbn d ihb gems maporlne atelee That ... apinkbro should nd be iM sob mearro d Ilmllirlp eavere flro damage. TM probbrn b ueuaNy one d human ebmem; • aplnkbr aystetn may be ehul off eM brgdten:' (aerpAroae/ ,~ ,9 5z; uc~ :~ .R ~S 3~ ei~~FZ ¢ze8 ~r € $~~55 _ ^~_ ~ ~. -- ~ °e~--~ -. a=~"'sae ~~ -~a3`_; g za' ='$gi;~ ie ~~~s, s¢ -,3~ja a~ Cg R _ <]NS-t•_ ~- -.5 -i ~Q I~~ W C 3~t~S G5 8-i r~i ~e ~~~~ `~ r~~E G p ~F3 y' _. A zi ~ .~.. Ez~i`a 9. C :aa~~ ~co ~~~'~ ~•~ ~ =n a as ~ ~~a ~ `~ !xi $k e: ¢i F? g ~..~~ i L J r ~ ~ Y i~ ~~ !~ ;~~~~ _~~' '3=~___ ~3;._I' 3. :-y _s ~_°_ v :, lso/let ATm>r.~z Ge~sAL~s a+ra;xas vol•~tc~ 7z ~ Opinion No. SS•904-September 14,1957 }tu]ucstcd by: STATE FiT'E MARS11Ai. Opinion b}': TORN K,VAN DE ICAhiF, Attorney Ccneral Ronald M. Weiskopf, Deputy Tnc HONORABLE JA NIFi F. MCMUI.LEIJ, STATE FIRE MAR- SHAL, haz requested an opinion on'thc following qucsdors: 1. Under sections ]7922, 1795B.5 and 17958.7 of d?o State housing Law, may citiex and counties adopt building standards relating [o fire and panio safety that am mote stdngcn[ than the state standards adoptcA by the State Fire Marsnal? 2. hlay a fire protection district adop[ a (im prevention code or regulations se¢ing forth building stzndards relating to fire and panic safety that arc stricter than those contained in the State Building Standards Code? CONCLUSIONS 1. Cities and counties may not adopt building standards tnlating to fire and panic safety that an: more stringent than those adopted by the Snte Fire Marsha! undttscctions 17922, 17958.5 or 17953.7 of dte State Housing Taw. 2. Afirepmtection district may not adoptafire pevemion code or othu regulations that set forth building standards mlating to fire and panic safety which are stricter than Urc standards contained in the State Building Standards ~ "Me. ANALYSIS `. - .,.,,.+ . ~,~ vi .im .i{aw nm iviegilai i$ to pNmUK ono ccvelop ways and means of protecting life and property against fire and panic. f'fealth & Saf. Code, § 13100.1 J' Toward that end several sectiors of the F.'ealth and Safety Code direct the fire Marshal to prepare anA adopt building standards rClazing to rlnain aspects of fern prevention and for the pmtection oltit;. and property against fire and panic ir, various camgotics of swctures throughout the state. (Sec e.g., §§ 13708 (state-owned buildings and ins[im- tions], 13143 (anain types of oaupancies such u jails: hospitals, nurseries, scaools, theaters. and auditoriums), 13143.6 (occupancies for umicustodial care]; 1321 I (high rise sweturet], 17920.7 (swetural fire safety and fire-resis- tart exits in multiple story swctures let for human habitation), 17921tb) (betels, motels, lodging houses, aparenent houses, dwellings, buildings. and accessory sWCNru].) 17tese building andards arc submitted m the State Hui lding Standards Commission for approval under the State Building Stand- '•^_:: t , ,. rni„ r a ~ < x l 5901 _~ t°^••~. p••°•~,a Escq.~aili~aiv-'u`iir{fmUii$lled in tilC~9:C 8 ui''ding Standads Code (T1t.24, Codc Cal. RegsJ. (§§ 18907,18930, t893B, 18740, 18942, 18943; 69 Ops.CaLAtty.Gen. 260, 261 (1986): cf, y 18902.p Two of the satimu pursuant to which the State Firc Marshal adopts but Iding sr ndards. sections 17920.7 and 17921(6), appear in the State Housing Law (HCal th ,$; $af. Code, div. 13, pt L5, § 17910 ct seq.). Sections 17922, n,Ar.,,lj (IM ryWtpry rtfr ~,.2 {p 111c 11470, .nE $~ r1Y (~Oac. + 1Tc l.eeilnu,<I,u rermUyprv.iaeAq•I Jl rtfcre,•ca,o \c SU,r auJd,nr SUnaaNf CO+e, U,c $mr nl Ulinl Cade, or 7n., L d the IiIJnm6 nm„inlmm~r CN:+t,tll mu+Nr'C+IJrm,: O~a4nU s,u,4ke Qdc" (1 HO?, dda! M Sua l0}t, V, l IoA, r, i?aN;. L) In,+much .. +r q.,dr fmn ~) e ,-~f11,f1•~~hi<A ruanolhn r.`d'.IIM".G•m amld,ny.tundna CCdc," .•~!.Anllir~irem,.o.C ,eful `„r-~- t5Z A7?OM~V GL'~'FRAL'S OPMGNS \'ol~me'R 17958.5 and 17938.7 of that Law permit lacat agencies to modify certain state building standards to accommodate certain local conditions. We are specifi• ca:Iy asked wheNer under Nose panieilar sections, cider and counties, and also fire protection disuicts, may a0opl building standads which at more stringent Nan Nose adopted by Nc Fire Marshal. We conclude Nat wrier the ' specified codesectiorls,neithercitiesan<tcoundes,norfirepmtectlondistricts. Wray adapt buuding standards more stringent than Nose of Ne St=te Fn MarshA? To be clear at Ne Outscl, Nis opinion is specifically conamed wiN Ne authoriryof local agencies to adaptmore tatingem standardsdlanNoseadopteA by Ne State Fre Marshal under Nc t1,ree particular sections of Nr, State Housing Law we a2 asked abou[. Bcp tine of Na[ specific focus we do not address other pt'ovisions of law Nat p;nni[ local agencies to adop~~ local building standards Na[ deviate fmm state building nandards adopted oy Ne Sta[e Fitc Marshal, and which may permit ttxm to adopt stricter building sandards Nan those Neneunder. (See e. f., §§ 13216, 17931(d), 17920.7; cL, 56 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 13 (1975).) 1. Cities and Counties Adoatinx Buil7ine Standards Relatinx To Frcand Panic Safetv Under Sections 17921, 17938. 17958.5 and 17958.7 of the State Housine Law That Arc More Strinecnt Than The State Fire ~ Marshal's Standards. Undersection 7otaNCle M ofNe CalifomiaCotutitution, a ciryo[tcunq "may make... wittdn its limits all local,police, sanitary, and other ordinances anA rr•miluinnc nnr im rn„n;... ,..:m ,. _ _~ I~•;;~,' `~- - ;i i J A local oNinance which is intended to protect tM public healN, safety and welfare, such az one prescribing building standards relating to fire safety, would fall wiNin that ambit. (36 Ops.Cal.Atry,Gen. 13, I4, supra; cf.. Peoplt cs rel. Deui(mejian v, Caunry ofMendocino (1984) 36 Cal.3d 476, 484; PecOle v. Mueller (1970) 8 Ca1.App.3d 949, 934 !n. 1,) The ordinance woWd be presumed valid so long as it did not corrtlict wiN general, i.e., state lax•. ((Y., Freeman v. Conrra Canto County Woro Du~nicr (1971) 18 CatApp.3d 4iM, 408: Sranislaw Co. arc. Assn. v, Sranls/aur (1937) B Ca1.1A 378, 383, 38d, i But local legislation Nat does wMia v'iN state law is void. As cut Supreme l'oun has summarized: ""'AS defined by Ne cases Ne constitutional phrase 'aMin wi W genera] laws' ... may arise in Several different ways. It may grow out o: the exact language of Ne stare and municipal laws r N't wm .Iw uktd raMa ~ fue pRUdan dinria mWd wop Mradin6 rYndudr RL1aia t. fart tnE ptnic IJaY dwt weumae,RUnaivt awn Y,aY (wd in • u7 aamry oode. 7TY ulna o14.: ucmegwn,m i, RndYedmm bywranmcia.duitaiu Me tanGn mryml tdagbuadintuendud. ICiYlnr b nR uid p.Nt YItM/ latl tR maC I VNatlll dwn Nqt tdL{ILd ~' IiM aYw fIR I.ttYav. tM ~hn f~R praeNm diluieu mrv na do.o nNa, O ©riginal Poor Quality S.plemhr Ueo A7rop.~TY GE~'CIUL'S OI'p'tOSa Itl] (cilationsj or from a local Aticm pt'to imt]ose additional mt(ui_rements in a field that is precmeted by 8cneral law' (citations) or from the scale's adoption nf' a 8enend scheme for the n:8uluion of a particular suhjecf (citationsj~Baron v. Ciry of Las Angeles (1970) 2 Ca1.3d 535, 541 (emphasis added); see aLw Pcoplc u re( Ocu!~nejiart v, - County o,FMendo<ino, supra, 36 Cal.3d at 484-485; Lancatter v, lfunicipat Caurt (19"72) ti Ca1.30 805, 806, 808; 58 Ops.CaLAtty.Ger. S 19, 521.523, 529 (1975); 58 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen 13, 14, supra,) "Conflict" with slate law can thus arise in many ways, aM as pertinent herein one of them occurs when the s:ate has ensued a comprehensive legislative scheme intended for uniform application throughout the state and a local ordinance seeks ro impost a more stringent requirement to govern a particular facet of Ne ama. in such a case, the local ordinance would be "to that ezunt void ituofar a.9 it prohibits what (thej state law authorizes. ICitations.j" (Markus v. fusrice't Courr(19531117 Ca1.App.2d 391, 397; see also, Dpnvifle Fire Prorecr(on Dist. v. Duff (Finaneial & Cnrstr. Co. (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 241, 249; In re Lane (1962) 58 Ca1,2d 99, 102-103; 61 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen 365, 372 (1975);43 Ops.Cat.Atty.Gcn.218, 219 (1964).)' The State Housing Law presently constitutes a legislative design to secure uniform building standarcl5 Ltiroughout the state and to Freempt local divergen- t' ks U)eretrom, czcept as specifieaUy authorized by it. Pnorto 1970, the State Housing Law, although detailed and comprchettsivc,hsd not preempted the field of building safety standards because it specifically empowered cities and cnunues to enact oumm~g regtttauons Imposing standaNS that were "equal ro or greater than those promlilgated by the state (former § 17951: Scats. 1961, th. 1844, p. 3922, § 8), and it made Ule state standards inapplicable in those :peal jurisdictions which did so (former §§ 19825 (Stars, 1966 ch. 1844, p. 3926, § 1).19826 (id., § 12, p, 3927)). (See, Ciry• of Bakcrsfte(Av. Mi(la(t 966) 64 CaL2", 93, 100-107; see Danvif(e Firc Protection Dist. v. Dwye(Fimntia( ~°.' Constr. Co., stylrrr.58 CaLApp.3d 241, 245; Pegn!e v. 6'hee(er (1973) 30 CN.App.3d 28Z, 289; Bmlm E(ecrrie Co, v, Ciry ofHuntingron Beach (1915) 33 CaLApp.3d 573, 577.) 1 Urdu miek xl-,<aun 3, rvbdiviuar(r)dIM O:Iremn Q~ra:uua,,<berl ordiMnu of\ cbncrrily wn !E mpmmr {cnnat trot Inv wish ncpra m^m~nicipd dfun " (FuMrv.Ciryoybr~lry (1961) P CJ id bi1,70d; 6attm v, rwlu (19x1) ]Z r~l.]d I2tl~1J3•IM.) Bw "J do rubicn m<arr or r Id or ,hr Ic{ulnipn Art tern (w1Y u<vpiW M ,hc ruu, hurt it no roam rot wpplmwwry or eornplimmu p9giJnim,rum.lNnuSjeu n ahrnir<one p,R°IY Nu¢luiuea a c'murdopl Jfw.' (~]• ':.d:e:::i~.ii<wi',("/ru,(Csi Ti eV31'I/Ynv~lr fnr YVetreLnn /laervpMN f.yry._i a cove. Co.. sups, 38 GI .op.Jd t<I, 1c9. -wAilc'lUlm aucminruon or whn annituw ~ qAa uN>puI rfPir it olnn r dia~;uh quec6on' jciuJonj, Ua roum lo& rv d+r p,oNne s d Ih<arnbrrq ton mtvunrn Jir rdam,a annul e!'wnwide cmnm'Iciulimrj zero, NC mu)w Lcmroamg ngudlurddu Mrlur prmirim. ICn:.'~:nr.j" (69 Opr.W.AUy.Gm 2(17306 (19x6).) Thenurre of hovR unJorm muwidr Auilding mnd.~r rdn;n{ w nrt t:d prnic ufny vwtd 4 e mruerof'wtewid< cm~r. a" (58 OPI Cd Au>' Gm U, rw+.v, d.. A rn 19"0, rh, I1)n, p. =186, 7J . ~,. .,ao Original Poor QuGilt~y ---~ :Ea ATrpR~'FY GEn irthl.'S OP[\'IDNS Tdume i2 In 1970, however, the Legislatum subslanti ally amepdcd the State Hous- ing taw in order [o provide a comprehensive scheme w secure a general uni Connity of building standards throughout the 5u[e in matters such as safety and structure of buildings, details of conswction, use of materials. and electrical, plumt.ng and heating specifications. (Buts. 1910, ch. 1436, § 7, p. ' 2786; Green v. Superior Cowt (1911) 10 Ca1.3d 616, 627; Damllle Fire Yrotection Dut, v. DuffrJ Firianual & CDnstr. Co., supra, 5R Ca1,App.3d at 245441, 248; Baum Ekctrie Co v. City of Hrutting(on Beach, supra, 33 CaLApp3d 513, 584; Tarchner v. Ciry Caunci! (oJLaguna Beach) (1973) 31 Ca1,App.3d 48, 60; 60 Ops.CaLA[ty.Gen. 234, 237.239 (1977); 55. Ops.CaLAtty.Gen. 157, 160 (1972); S4 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gc t 87, 88-89 (1971).)' I[ (i) dittoed the State Department of Housing and Community Development to adopt rules and regulations Imposing "the same requiremenu" that are conuined in various uniform industry building awes (Sots. 1970, ch. 1436, § 1, p. 2785, amentling § 17922, rubd. (a)), and then (ii) it removed the atommentioned authority of cities and wuntiu co adopt more atingentbu0d- in, standards than Nose imposed by the state (and the companion provision making Ne less stringent state standards inapplicable [hose localjurisdittions which did so), and inquired instead That every city and County adoptordinances or regulations imposing Nose same requirements within Neirjutisdictions within one year, orNey would M made applicable in Ncm at that time by force `, cf law (iC., § 7, p, 2756, addir)g ¢ 17955). (See, Danville Fire Protection Dist. v. Duffel Financial & Constr. Co. supra, 56 CaLApp.3d 245; People v. iVhecte., supra, 30 CaLApp.3d 262; Baum Electric Co. v. Ciry ofHuntington _ cca ... 3a re er.,, :d 579.55 gos.Cal.AUV.Gen. 157, 160, rupra; 34 Ops.CaLAtty.Gen. 87, 68-59, supra.) gut even Nen local jurisdictions we[C allowed wide latitude to deviate from sate building standards under Ne State Housing Law. (See ag., Do-um Efecrric Co. v. Ciry ofXunringron Beach, supra; Aeople v. Wheeler, supra; 55 ' W1+mnadoptW Ctic 1910 ammdmenuaNa Suu Hmeina Aa, a,e lst:'flmrtdcdaredulu'v,c vrJOm,rty e(cednUwvthom du SUU... iwuJ•mauarM auuwiae curtn a,M mn¢m dmeuwpdd nduu hvumt mot uM benun Na affcimcy-(pma+t `weina mnewaim mducuy and iu proauaior." aid S,: rod, "uNrumi:y tcmldl be arninad wi:nin . (r:mewory a Iaal ammomY. M d ,w;n/ loin ao.ammmu a adopt cMntn making n:odlnu;imt in loci mda N,N m dV(a,~,ua A ImAI rotdi- ame, , .." (Suu. t9]0, aA Id7q npm; DanrJla f,n rroanion Din r. D,AeI Fiwuul d Cww.. l'e, mpg, 58 GLAppAa N t, 315; Aaop(a v. a'heder (191))10 G7dpp3d 363, 1a9; 6awt E(eavk Ce. r. CayofHwGnrton BmaA,aapra,3a G;.App.3tl 571,577.) U fAOpa,W.Aay.0ea.3al,rvpe,w poixd w: J,n Iha wdw,an a du vni(orm mdca wu an mcmpt to tMmekmtint mot by rNodna p,muNn mm ana mcrutNt ma rtnuary of d,a hwtint irdvnry. ((d., n 337.) By aaowi,a Nc inMtvry a Ny on a tintle au a tuM.kt nuur Nan a d'dfaentem fur rvary aru, a maid dev<bpmo,s aaonamiaal and e.~FImlaWma('ml to oa,i,.dli;tr4~+n4{ii.',IS'SYt.:~J-~a^.A.nrtnalf (/•}..p ~1[)INayraC YtnA[r puryroae :mdeayml the buildut rtaulatimt wn au pram,m tl Ne ryapkc AWm a,a afery. ,6a,vn Ebunc Go. v, Coy oJf(vnmtlon Bnrh, aWva, u 531 J In me ,gNiM w Wo 9o[nW oN tMt like undoan coda,rt bud m prdutional er.petia, mmm~ and un..a dot i. nn auaw.ly avanaGe bkeal .tuc,n, the adapuon of auu.ida enifvnn nandaar would as nerve Nn ad. (6D Oq,Cat.Ary.pn.. mpg; ua ale Danrah fva r•oucnnn 04:. r, D A 1 Financial d Cmua. Co ,.upa, Si Gl.App.M 311, 3+2) t~ (~~ v?lc-a.~ .. ~ .28 ~ rya [a 3Ca 13:`;0 '©riginal Poor Quality sqx<m~er 1989 AT:ORXCI'GF.6ean C50rN0~5 185 Ops.Ca].Atty.Gen. 157, 16G, rupra; 54 Ops.Cal.Any.Gen. 67, 88 (197q.)" This isbecause whilethe 1970 amendmcnisto the Law were designed to secure a uniformity of cedes throughout the State, the Legislature showed a "sen- sitivity to, and dcfcrcncc for, local conditions and needs." (55 Ops.CaLAny.Gen. 157, 1(0, supra, quoted in Baum Electric Co. v, Ciry of Hurtrircgron Beach supra at 56M1J FOr example, the Lawazamcnded provided Iha[ a county or city mould make such changes or modifications in the state requirements "as it determines arc reasonably necessary bceause of local conditions" (§ 179555, added by Scats. 1970, eh. 1436, § 4, p, 2786). and it also provided that the State Housing law waz not meant to alterlocal building mgutadont that had peen enacted priorto its effenive date. (§ 17958,7, added by Stars. 1970, ch. 1436, § 5, p. 1436.) In 55 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 157, rupra, we concluded that the former provision demonstrated an intention to allow cities and counties to adopt regulations with additional or mere restrictive building standards than those promulgated Dy the su[e (rd., at I60•ltil), and in 54 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 87, rupra, we said that the lance provision mean that Ne Lau•'s requirement for uniformity did not apply to building activity that was already regulattd by an existing local regulation enacted en or before tiovcmbcr 23, 1970 (id., at 88.69). These hroad exemptions fmm statewide building standards no longer obtain and state preempfion of the "field" is more complete. In 1950 the ~ [sgisla[ore(i)amendedscction17958.SofLheSlateHousingtawtoseverely limn the types otloca] wndi[ioru for which local agencies could deviate from satewidc building standards (Stars. 1980, ch. 130, p. 303. § 2; Slats. 1960, ch. 1235, p. 4203, § 9), end (ii) it deleted the exception fmm the requirement of unifonnt[y previously Pound in action 17956.7 for nonconforming local buildine regulations that were enacted on or before .`JOVember 23.1970 (Brats. 1950. ch. 1295, p. 438 i, § 1). As mentioned, what we have now is a state preemp[ion of the field of huilding srandeN regulaton, except for such now morelimited deviatioru therefrom as the 4gislaturchasspecificallypem,ittrd local agencies. Our a[temion is pardcu]ady anE specifically directed to duce sections of the Law in which the Legislature his pominrA such activity: actions 17922, 17956.5, and 17958.7. Befmc we [Um to them, however, we will br.;;lly relate them to each other and eo othersectlons of the Stare Housing Law. We have mentioned how two sections of the State Housing Law impose a duty on the State Fire Marshal m prepare and adopt building standarcls relating io ceruln azpecu of fire prevention in mtiltiple story swctures ter for !roman habi;a:ion (, ;',92,^,.') and ir,batets. sa[els.lod¢in. hodsas. soartrnem houses and dwellings, and buildings in general (§ 17921, subd. (b)), Hut the major Nrust of the Law is coneemed with building standaNs (and other regulations) prepared and adopted by dlc Depanment of Housing and Com- `. Qriginal Poor Quaitty 156 p170FYEY GE\EAACS OfD10~5 Volume72 muniry Development. Subdivision (a) o! section 17921 imposes a dory upon thnt deparm7em (cL, § 17920. su W. (d)) to adopt building standards (othcrth;m those relating to fire and panic safety) for the protection of the public health, sa(ery and general welfare with rts~ea to are ennsWCdon, alteration, rtpair, etc., of all hotels,motels. ioe~ing houses, apartment houses. and dwe0ings, (§ 17921, subd. (a).) As with the Frt Marshal's building standards, those of the department etc submitted to the State Budding Standards Commission for approval and inclusiGn in rht State Building Standards Code, undtr the State Building Standards L.aw (div. 13, pt. 2.5, 4 18901 et seq.). Subdivision (a) of section 17922 requires that the building standards rhos adopted by the depanment "impose substan[ially the saint requirements as are contained in the most recent editions of [various] uniform industry codes .. . • (§ 17922, subd. (a).) (See generally, 63 Ops.Cal.Atry.Gert 566 (1980.) SectJOn 17955 then essentially makes those standads applicable in all cities znd roundest it ptrtnits cities and counties to make changes of modifications in them only if the changes would "impose the same requirements;' and it provides that iPa city or county does not amend, adopt or rexal oNinanas or regulations to impose [hose requirements, dtey will become applicable in such city or county 180days aftcrthey are published in the State fiuilding Standards Code! (Sec also, § 16941.5, subd. (a},) Hut there is one notable exception to section 17958: Under section \.. 17958.5 a ttiq or county may make changes or modifications to the building standards adopted pursuant to section 17972, subdivision (a), "ag it deter mints ... arc reasonably necessary because of tocat climatic, geological, of topographical conditions:' (§ 17958.5.) Section 1795g,7provides that for any - •~- ~-~+t a,.:cn;a;on must make an express such change to tic civ~:;c., ..... ._ "finding" that it is reasonably necessary btcausc of those particular leeat conditions, and it mus[ Cde the "finding" with the Department of Housing and Community Development ~ sacban ii938 p:v+idu ueegt upwidad inseaions 1793S.EU,d Ii939.•nyvay wcamrym•rmake diNtt+ ' we pmvuiana aaepud N~ ~'=m ro s•mion 17913 W puea+nrd N +bc Suta Buedwt SurAtkl Cods m+AC ONV ntulaumrdnaeanvtdupudpuns.new Saden Itq)Zw•maW, add,or~vl maintncn mnNt•u9M •~tud Lmpoat Ne same mqui:anena .+tumnuintd m eta pmri,ion+ adspud punuw w stmion r7931 eW p+btuhW m a,o alY9 B9Udnt Sw,danL Cadem Ns,:Nta mt94dtw adopd gnoan w SecGw 14923 ermtkem•ntu or mdJiu.iam to Nou nquiranmu ulon wpnu f:ndin4 punutm w $u,m+ I79Sa.7 t9d 17955.1. U shy city or wmuy dot om unard, ado, m rq*+1 odintnar m ret9hd9n• w impou Nwe aquimmcm+ m make ,dunt4 or mmUiuridn: h Nou regvimmmu upm eapwr fmdNt+,,hc pr. „iun+ p~bli+M1d v, Nc Sow a .Idmt Sunlardt Code m dK ahea rt(ylyim, pr(p:YlkutO pYyU.m r9 SKYm 17921 +Na <rypaode w iund+lua Ese9mc alleruva i s, day, ar.: r!:_e~,e! M N• mmmia:can. iJr,rJ,R-n,:-;a, addM1iTS, •ad de3uiMf w art Sine auadint swdaNl Code ad9p:W by. cVy a uumy gmwmr to sermon i iiS".:, w5atrt, riN as rpplicAla poruom d +be Suw auil9in{ SundaM+ Coat, tbaa baamc dfcc9w I tDdrya rturrybhution dN. Suw 0uddwt Sundsnb Coda by Ne Suw cocain{ sundardt Cwnmuion' W '®riginai Poor (1Juli~j ~- ScpmmMr 1969 AITORNEYGFI.:RAI;5GPM0AS ta7 The first question azks whether under sections 17922. 17956.5 and 17958.7 a city or county may adopt building standards which ate mort stringent than those adopted by the Slate Firc Marshal? The essence of the answer is simple: Inasmuch as section 17922, upon which the other actions are pttdieated, only deals w$h building standaMS adopted by the IXpartment otHousing and Corrtmunity pevclopmcart and not those adopted by the State Fee Matshal, none otthe sectioru abmu which we are asked provides authority for a city or county to adopt more stringent standards than those adopted by the latter. A. ~erhon l^922 As just mentioned,secfion17922dircetstheDepan- men[ofHousing and Community Devetopmcniin adopting building standaMs for approval by the Commission on Housing and Community Development under dte State Building Standatds iaw to "impose substantially the same requirements as are contained in the most recent editions of [various] uNform industry codrs ... ;' (§ 17922, subd. (e): see 63 Ops.Cal.Atry,Gen. 566 (1980).) µ'hcn speaking of building standards, alt of the subdivisions of the section refer to [hose of that Department. Thus the action commences: "(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided by law, the huildina standards adtroted and submitted by the depetunen[ far approval ... and the other runs and regulations .. , adopted .. . ~ pursuant ro this chapter ... shall impost substantially the same rtquitemenm as are containeA in Ne most recent editions of the following trniform industry codes ae adopted by the organizations specified ...." fEmohssis added.l Subdivisions (c) and (d) of the section each wmmences with the similar reference: "(c)[and (d}) Regina[ions other than building standatds width arc adopted, amended or repealed by the department and buiidin standards adopted a^d submitted by the department for aDDroyal .. . :' (Emphasis added.) Nowhere in section 17922IS any reference madew building standards adopted by Iht Stale Frc Marshal. As waz seen at the very outset of this Opinion, his adoption of buildinr standards for submission torapproval to the Commission on Housing arM Community Development and incorporation in the Stau Huilding Standards Code is directed by other provisions of law, viz., sections 13106, 13143, 13143.6, 13211, 17920.7, and 17921(bl. R is true Nal two of the sections pursuant to which the State F rc Marshall adopts building standarC~, 17920.7 and t7921(b), are found in the Star. Housing Gw and trtdeed•appear in tha very same chapter in which section 17922 is found. But when section 17922 speaks of building standards, it does \.. 'original Poor Quailiy ~- Isa nttoavEree.Eluttsop~iovs vnlmner. r.o[ infer to bull ding standards That arc adopted under [he chapter of the Stale Housing Law N which it appears, as it refers to other rcgvlaliorus that are adopted Ihercunder. Such a reference could bring the building standards adopted by the State Fire Marshal pursuant ;o sections 17920.7 and 1792I(b) u'ilhiq its ambit. instead, as we have seen, when section 17922 speaks of building ,randards, it specifically and continually rckrs to those tha[ are adopted by N+t Dzpdrunent vt flwsing and Community Development. nc- cordinglythe section would not provide auNoriry for a city orcounry to adop[ building standards which ace more Stringent than those of the State Fite Marshal.' g, cw^tinn9 T79s8 and [ 795R 5 qs mentioned, what the 1970 amend- ments [o the State RousingLaw were first enacted, seuion 17958.5 gave broad aulho~ty for cities or counties to make changes or modifications in the state building standaMS taken from the uniform building coda m adept Uxm to local conditions.' In 1980, however, me Legislature amended ttre section and grt::dy rcsuicted the types of local conditions for which a deviation front statewide standards could lx made: it limited them ro local climatic, geographical, or topographical conditions. (Stan 1980, eA. 130, p. 303.5 2; Stan 7980, ch. 1238, p. 4208, 5 9J• Section 1795SS currently provides in pan as follows: ~ r we w awsrt Nu anc wbtivulm of •euiw 179II dau P'o'dde fa. t+Sma oau,dm d bc•1 •uNOritY. Svbdivi•ion (b)'~maY etd mWn;y tu•tw ntdtdm in Ne we d bat me mm ngviranmu, but t(rt vc•, buadir,/ •eh•ck, •(de IM nn ycd n9oirtme{!. 6n0 property line ngwrarrmtrwlouljvri>dinim>: nawiN•undvygregoimmrAfaMm•ufmh NbMSna Xewint r-.- "r ,+m. •ny ragvuvm«r mwc m n+arm m lam owe Hommt ;^wp' woWd man Ne Iml rttd•dw n Nine •mav world uk• rinudena ew rnYNd,t fond N Ne S:a:c Hw•iot [rw. (Cf_!c F•Marriate aJDovo (1971)15 GLAppb 675, 67a (n.9; Srw ofCd/>nio v. S,yrwr Cnu.r (1963) 276 GI.ApP.]d 691, 695 s96J 71mt world includ. Ne Sun Fua 6LnIW'• hadint amd•rd• whitl, •rt •dapM rywwm axiom 17931 ud 17920.7. Nowever,duptd•lrm wiN •pplYint Nc nnmd jovdicdm d wbdivuim N) w as foes MwvMi'> hadina •undnd> k dw am coma. wltiN n n•uw (mloul ntd•tim Involveumint udmt Wi1Nnt nudu'd•• (SCea,7uclwr d Caut.. Ca., cvprc, 36 UI.Apr.3d 311.317) T hint i• m uu dw vdhkmay hu bdn a•ni W aY <i6m and oo•mk• (fmnMrrv, Cuy C«welL ey+a r 62 n&mnt to GI, Cenw.. •n k7, 7; d. ^920(b), 16909(•), Gw. Cede, 65t00, 63!50) •rd it nu om wiN which Jm Sam Pin M•M•1 wmdd b lnvyv,d m •doPu't buad'mi aud•dx. Grefedy, •n,ce Ne'.pufic trod d tew.ed but juddimim N rvmrvi<im (D) n • vary iwdmd me,• it'u by implication • dmid d N! tmlo[ my ttmw j•tiadkdm; fDonrak Fvr )ravcrun Dor. v. Dv~d F%m.ciol 8 Camm. Co, supra, 56 CJ.ApPad AI, 217), and a wh.wwM mtbc•Inud•uNonrym•nmoN•rua•. •ocTu •daplir.;, hdbint a.nLN•. (lfdd.) • M mIVMOY wend, aam 17956.3 •vnply pn.iam Nn'Ir,n •dWtiat as orAmlmn a ntW>rim+ ryrtunt m 6eaien 1]956, • ury a cmnry cosy m•ke mT d•ntm « modJaUmem Ne regvironmu ovvuvmn N ndul•rimr .doped wrw•nl to Smtim 1]912 •r a deumi„e..,. ~sereNy -••••.• ~ ~r_-_-::'xd:::d~du.:,' ~7.::::. 79;J. dr. iii6.PTii6. i.l • The Wnwtim wu bud m •n Upinim wn h•d i••ud m 1971 b which w< aid N•t Ne bue ph:uc'Imil wnditicm" mold not include politinl, eewamie « wrn•191'°iwem•, rrn it denmy.ny p9nibtlllY nr •UtNid[ Wli(ORIIi1Y 11, bU116 Y,t CCdGf, •nd M u mrmlydnd N•1 N( tint, nfv1RA "Mdy m mndnimr uTiN cosy b I•Nlyd Fm•AY a amtnphlul a Icpopnphi«I.' (S! Oq.W.AUy.Gn. W7, KJ (197q)) lVe luntm wl m+cnniw rhne yon btm •M (uMer 6•w••m iu nmfudwn vu~IM+ ©riginai Poor Quailiy I `/ yen mmnrr 1969 Al-rO0.CF.Y GECEe AL'SOF. ROBS 1a9 "(a) Except as provided in Section 17922.61w'hich deals with the Office of 1`oise Control establishing minimum noise insulation standards for certain multi-occupant dwellings], in adoping [he ordinance ~ulationa wRUant to Sertion 17958, a city or wanly may make such changes or modifications in the requirements contained - in theprovisions DUhlished in the State Buitdine Standanls Cods and the other re lotions adopted pursuant to Section 17922 as it deter- mines, pursuant to rite provisions a Sac:ion 17958 ~, ate reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geologicah br topographical conditions. (4i For p~trpo5es of this subdivision, a city and county may make reasonably necessary modificatons ro the requirements, aio7ted pursuant to Satidn 17922, contained in the provisions of the cMe and regulations on the basis of local conditions:' (§ 17958.5; emphases added.) While it may appear at first glance that subdivision (a) of section 17958.5 would enable a city or wanly to Impose stricter building standards than those adopted by the State Frtrc Marshal if called for by he panicularitiu of local climatic,geological,onopogrdphieconditions..'°whenone foilowsthrough to examine the sections referred to in the subdivision. one sees that it does not. Subdivision (a) of section 17958.5 authorizes cities and wundes (i) in adopting ordinances or regulations pllf°J'nnt to Secrinn. 17958, Qi) to make „-_ chances in the requirements contairxA in the provisions of the Swte 9uilding Standards Code and the other regu)ations adorn d n reTrs,~ant to s_'ron 179+2. Section 17958, we recall, provides that tides and counties must adapt Ne state building standards promyltBtSd rmraant to ceainn 17922 within their Rspec- tive jurisdictions wltmrt lSO Days, iex wcy w c tpp:iCae`r' t^ '~^m by operation of law, But it also provides that those local agencies may (i) make changes in those standards if that would impose "the same requirements" as would have been imposed by them, and (ii) that they may change or modify the state standaMs if found to be necessary becauu oflocat climatic, gcologi- cat, or topograpluwi conditions. (See fn. 5, wueJ 1Te problem with using sections I795S and 17958.5 as authority for eitie.9 or counties to adopt more stringent building sandards, albeit for limited reason;, thanthose adopted by the State Fin Marshal, isthatboth sections fifer exclunvely to buildin; standards (or other regulations) fldopted.ptitSYalll3o. section 17922, but that section, as seen, dea15 only with building standards adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development and not those of the State Firo Marshah Since section 17922 does not purport to deal with helldina standards 2depted by the State Firs Marshal, nei her could Ac poven d,l,c Comnuriao m Nwrina °M oewbpnent (Sa (A qu U1.Mry.Gm. 3N.3aa~A9, ,uy,<) 10 Fm ec°mple, under Ne abt'•iri°n. r viz or vaumy could praaid~ J,e we u m.lmidr, ggL°nm, iuwibum,, hvi<u, <mnac. emu, tt mahM, of cmmuaim. (17912 nW. fc) ) ~.. cU ' ®r+~inai Poor Quciiiy tw ATTOwverc~rcAt~s orciovs vnw,n<71 V section 17958 which refers ;, it. norsecdon !7958.5 which n;fers to the latter in mm. Accordingly, nei[her section 17958 norsecdon 17958.5 could provide authority !or cities and counties [o adopt stricter building srandards than those adopted by me State Rrc Marshal. C. S crin~cR 7. Section 17958.7 prescribes the express finding shat a city or county must make before modifying state building standartls wrier section 17958.5: "(a) Except ss provided in Section 179226, the gweming body of a city orcouury, beforemaldn¢ any modifications orchan¢es pursuant m Semen 179585, aha11 makc an express fitWing that such modificatioru or ahmyes are rrzsonably nmetsary because of local climatic,gaologi(xlortopographicaiconditions. Suchatlndingshatl 6e available az a public record. A copy of such findings, mgerher with the mtdification or change expressly markcd and IdenrifirA m which eadr svcb HrSding refers, shall be filed with the department. No such modification or change shall becomeBffective orope~ative for any purpose utm7 the findin¢ and the modification orchan¢e have been filed with [he deoamnetu, "(b) ThedepanmentmayrcjectamodificafionorchangeAed by the yoveming body of a dry or county if no finding waz sub• mined." (g 17958.7; emphases added.) ~ The problem tvidt viewipg section 17958.7 az authority for a local agency to make changes in building smndards adopted by the State Fite Marshal is that it refers [o modificuions or tdtanges a ary or rntu¢y would make purwan[ m ac:.uw. ii55e~, itur as we Haut J~ shown ma[ section apQltes omy to changingthebuildings[andards oftheDepartmentof Housinyand Commutilry Development and roe drone of the State Fite Marshal. Indeed, the cortecvtess of uur perception is confirmed by me requitement of section 17958.7 far any such changes to be approved by 'the depamnenc'^' Thus, section 17958.7 would not avUSOriu tides or counties m adopt more stringent building stand- ards than those adopted by the State Fve Marshal. It haz been sugges[ed d ~.t the section may do se indlrccdy because of a revert[ ameMment to section 18941.5 of the Srte Building' Siandards Law, That secion was amended last year (Brats. 1988, ch. 1302, p. [3314j. § 1) and now reads as follows: "(a) The building standards.comaided N [[he various UnlYonn ~ ' Codes]asm.ctenadin the State But7dingStaMards Code shall apply to au uuvnan(ec d~mq~hmrt.rjp cn~r. nnA chair y_epme efren:.~e - " ta. povdoM rtauirtnrmr tar Jr ra.kna drupN V ud to NNa vWr dre UapprwA wr; +pp.~ay drq,dcd •u . daamnr a rMYxea+ire +aopdon d cAdnaa or nwdldwtionr" (5t Om.GLAav.CRn. US. Hd. mi.n eirin. 4.r. rmn .. ilx,r n.<.,,;,r,~„Sys '._ _ .c^...,_r t,,......... 15d,177, rvpn; SS Op. GlAay.Gm. 157, I Si,+vpn) W Snxrmbc. 1484 AiTOkKEY GEVEIUL'SG~70~'S 191 1 d0 days after publication in Ne Stau Building Statdards Code by the Stale Building Standards Commission. "(b) Amrndmenu, addifions, and deletions ro Ne Stan Build- ing Standards Code adopted by a city, eounry, or city and county pursuant to subdivision (c) or pursuant to Section 17955.7, together wiN all applicable portion of the State Building Standards Code, shall become effective 180 days after publication of the Stare Buiid- ing Standads Cede by rte Stars Building Standards Commission The suggestion is thatundersubdivision (c) acity orcounty could adapt amore nnstrictive building standard Chart om adopted by the State Fire Marshal and published in Ne State Building Standard Code, if it properly make a finding under section 17958.7 that such is "masonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or ropognphieal conditions." ~ We reject Ne suggesova Subdivision (c) of section 169415, as amended, dou no[ provide en iodepertdent grant of authoriry foe dries and counties to acs Rather, Ir speaks in negative terms of not Limiting the authority of those local cooties m establish more restrictive building standads because of Ne e>;rstence onocat etimatlc, geological, or topographical conditions. The grant of such "authority'' must Netetore be fourtd elsewhere, and i[ is - in sectlons 179585 and 17958.7 of the Stau Housing Law. But once so found, Ne measure of Ne authoory of cities and counties to act under thou sections is defined by Neirtetms, and they, asjustshown, do not rcarhbuilding standanls adopted by the State Rte MarshN. Inasmuch a uc[ion 18941,5 does not independently grant audrority to cities and wunties m act, it would not pemit Nose local jerisdicoons ro adopt mote s[ringent building standazds for Neir ivisdiciions Nan Nose adopted by Ne State Fire Mazshai. To summarize our aruwer to Ne fits[ question Nen: Since section 17922 of Ne State Housing Iaw does not deal with buBding standards adopted by the State Rte Marshal, neither it, nor section ~ 17955.5 and 1.7958.7 which are predicated open it, can authorize a city or county to adopt more suingent "u".d.'rr -'- x >,atidard5 reiaon¢ tU flrc and mnjr cafaty rhnJ; tA~C ad0p:ed by tht State Rre Marshal. Again Nough, Nis answer is confined by the parameters of the op'ution request and relates solely to Nose Ntee specific sections about which we were asked. ',..• +91 ~-aa~ lYCU Ci1N I••• i Qr`rg~nal ~'oor Quau,y Ij X42 ATTONYEY GkVFXAL'S OPATO~S Foivma 7$ ~ 2. Fire Protection Distrito Adoptina A Firo Prevention Code Or Ordinances With Bui]dinB~ Standards That Are Mom Stdnacn[ Than Those Adopted By 5'hc State Fre Marshal And Con[airled In The State Bwldina Standards Code, Unlike citiu and counties, fire poiecton districts arc not pran[rA broad poGcc power authoriry bl' the state Consti[ution. (CL, Moore v. Mrurlcipa! Corer(1959)170CalApp.2d548,555;S8Ops.CaL4try.Cs 275, 229,'11.3.) They are statures of statute, which servo m define their powers azld duties. (Cf., 68 Ops,Cal.P.tty.Gen. at 228:75 Ops.CalA[ty.Gen. 234, 235 (1955); 10 Ops.CalArry.Gert 47.48 (1947).) Art pro[ecdon disWcts ere pltsendy organized undo the fire Protection District Law of 1987 (div. 12, pc 3, § 13800 et seq,).'x 731st Law glues them aud3otiry: - to adopt ordinances ($ 13861, subd. (h)); - tD adopt a fire preventlon coda by reference, in Ne ma:mcr riot counties and tides do (§ 13869): and ~- to establish nrles and rcgWations lclating to furlilshing foe protection and odor services celatlng to die protection of lives and property ($ 13861, subd. (i); § 13842, 5ubds. (a),(f))?a Would these grantsof authority, either sing]lxr!y orin wmbinadan, authorize ~ a fits protection district to adopt a ftrc protection code or rcgulation9 w(th ix to 1487 N• Le[ir6mn,ma.ia.w t~ o..:=_.: v +>v+ tiYtA 1901, a6 365. +: av, I; µ 27, I3a01 a •eqJ od'a0eraedN i •riW Na fia P+aadm IXmla Vr d 19[1. (Sou 1987. aG 101] [Se 30.3. BeRarml. 10, I I J Far iht tam put, .vy M 1+r9•au+oo ditoia o+pniad er +rartaNnd older Ne lo+ma[~v "+mumplm eaitma u if h bad bin ottmad pFmmt btllt (vaw awl... ' (13ae3. FiW. (p) M eBeABmt apl•srfvv d 9wm~ Fra Plamuloe niwla Lr is rood uA^%. + F AN ~ a113i< d,. R',e Pn+rerimD 'at•w M19a1'1 (aW liae4weer u A a1.~i Nat •rs prcpand by ur Smug Cwmmiew m lain Oovmmenl is 13aa0ar 1981, is Saalvo U861 auvly dais,2uNetmaNPrvan dNtl):miut,pwvid'na mpmtu foBoer: 'A dimia uup Eavs and mtY ,outi•e .U titAn see powm,'eapre•• w impfia4 aausary b orry W the 9alPeut and iatam d aut poi, mvbW:me, hot net 1haNed ro Na rOaowYlt Pmwuf: '[D) To tdepi mBaebu fdbWnl aw pmMOm d Areda ] (mmnmdn8 viN Swim 2313q)of(~•pur)atP.n=NDivuiov2ot TWe3dNa Govemop4 Coda IU.. lows 13869,13610, I35/1.j y)To saW[rliaod mfam eWm WdmNbuom for Na.AfalOiPnoa4 o~en~m.ad maietMaae dNSawim l(wad ie Saeim 13867.".(CS.. twins U3at6 iebL( 7", . Apmarhotw.rea amaa c,mlm 1386?4NU dCwld'~t "pr_F.uyWoa iarviaa ., wry t.)i, .a .ausetmw m.!n..~_-.+,.~-.'; ~;,r;,~trt..mfm raatmt bNe proptiooaflive•MdpiaQmy: (l4, rubd. (n.) Saerim 13869 eperifluay mle'e••3• Fis Itievvelm nimim w'adop a !zee prtvmlion voile by mlemoe" u dtiu ne eomwt de mint Na W.arirnent Cos (50@1.7 i. (13869 [fonra 135/1).) VIOm ibty m n, Ne Mmia't be•rdu ^decroad a Ntubuva body and Ns di•q~m , .. dermed t Weal •tmry." (13t69J ~.~_ f it i.:~ina. ~(~,~:r ~i i.~ ~1:~ SequmhrlG80 AT[OIUv1:Y GEYEaAL'S OPrlIOA'S tq3 ~' building standards Na[ were more s[ringcm Nan Nose of Nc State Fire MatshalT We believe not. As we saw in a[L;werirtg Ne firs: question, Ne State Housing Law presently prccmpLS all local regulation of building standvds excep[ az ttte Legislature may pcrtni[ in certair[ arcaz. As we also saw N Nat law, Nc Legislaure has specifically permitud cities and co[tmies m adopt local build- ing standards which diverge from the stau standards in certain areas because of local candid[u[s, (§§ 17958.5, 17958.7.) But as ws have shown, tha! limS~ grant of authority does not permtt those local agencies m adop[ more stringent buildingstandards [elating m file andpanicsafery Nanthoxwhichareadopred by the Scaze Fire Marshal :1te authorry for foe prouttion districts m do so is evrn more attrnuated becauu Ne Legislature has not accoNed them a ' similar limited authority m adopt building standards which diverge from the taws standards.'' Srdeed, as we said inaresa[[opinion, we imew ofnod[ing in Ne State Housing Law that would confer discrcticnary aurhoriry upon fire pro[ection d!stricLS m adopt stricter building staMards than ate found therein. pd., at 228,229 J Could such authority be fond N the Fm Protecion District Law itself? There wro have seenthat fire protection distriL'rs are granted authority to adopt ordinances (§ 13861, subd. (h)), m adop[ a fire prevrntion code by reference (§ 13869), and to utablish riles and regulatiorurelating, interalia, tD furnish- ing fiu proreetion and other urvias (§ 13861, subd. (i): § 13862, subds. ~. (a),(r)). The Leg[sLUUre tuts deelueA the local provisien of Hrc proncdon services m be "critical m the pnfilic peam, health, and sahty of the state" (§ 13801) and the Ate Protection Distritt Law to tx "necessary for the public, realm, sarery, ara weuare" (s usua), necordu[g1y, the Legislature bas said [[la[ the Law "shall be L-berally coasoued m effecn[au its purposes. (/bid) (C£, A 1Jew [.aw. op.cirsupra, at 25: 68 Ops.CaLAtty.Gen, 225, 228, supra.) However, Ne foregoing grans of aud[oriry m fire protection districts N Nc Are Protection District Law of 1'~?7 arc general and arc controlled by Ne more spedEcprovisions Of the Stan Housing Law. (Danville Fire Protection Dirt. v, Dujjel, supra, 58 CaLApp.3d 24t, 247: 68 Ops.Cal.Any.Gen. 226, 228-229, supra.) In Danvi((e Fire ProreerionDut. v: Du}jelFinancia!&Constr. Co.,supra, 58 CalApp.3d 241, i[ was held tha[ a fin prouction distriM could not adopt an ordinance under tormer section 13859 [now § 1366!, subd. (h)] to reyvire Apiet Wl'rpeeifie and mrue'wMMUm wgawtjwldiala"office woe ore ragliranmre,Ied foe rain,bWdb rrdad.eba uW ewer ynmrglleor'7aa1 a Yeti mglirm~e. and plapeny are' ~wma'w,ulemam ra;,., !'r?'2 mN!iry~ryl w..~iA.~:f wibrF _l~s--_-.~er:..x,~ uNonry n ~eP ~oitd'mi o~odee'L wattle w mon wiiaml Nln rhe'rum'a Ewn u^out{ thn l flee praenim diwfa wadd h canridaed •'tpel pnWidm" wiV.(n ten obmal o(We mhdivuion. iu 'Em'ote /ma of rtumd power .. , it M impaoiim ~ amid a( iAe seen or uiY awm i'drdxUm" (DuvYG Fvr Prarnim Dur. r.OwDil Fi,woiel L CaWr. to, repo, Sa Cq.App.Sd 7A I.I47), ad wa Arrc a¢n how the rararwd eeue cn~'er mnma nuw•^ mJ me E:i1dNa rundlkr. rya AlT7RNEYGFNQUI.'SnPINInh'S Yolume'R certain heat and smoke detector alarm sysmrns and fire sprinkler systems to be installed in specific types of new buildings because the requirements of such were more stringer[ titan what was requirW by the State Housing L++~+,, ifd., at 243, 246-247.) 7'lte basis for the nding was that 'the fire potecdon rcquiremencs of the district were void as die field was totally prcentpte0 by the State Housing Law:' (/d, at 244.) Indeed, nc~ court apenficatly said that although the authority of a Fire protection L7isrrim m'adopt and eNorec reasonable oNinartus for the prevetttioa and suppression of flras and can- iagradottsand for the potecdon avd prrawahon otlife and property against the itl7atds of hie and conHagratlon" (former ¢ 13669) war broad, i[ was also gerural acrd contmHed by the mote ,~ec[Gc provisiore of secdoas 17922, 17958, and 179583 of the State Houshtg Law. (ld., at 247.)ra In 68 Ops.CaLAny.Gen. 226, rupra. we similarly corxludrA thatthe more specific provisions of the Sire Housing Law controlled over the authority of fire potectlon districts m adopt ordinances, so chat despite Ne language of section t 3869, a Hie protection disula did trot have the authority to adopt an ordinutcE «xluiring the irutalladon ofa wate[teservoir az the time of cortswc- rion ofrtewbur7dings indredisvict,becausethazwould imposcainores'~:ngent standard than the fire suppression and wakrdelivery requirements of the State Housng Law. (ld., at 228.) Tn fact, fn drat opirdon we want further and said that the autlwdty of fiti protecdon districts to adopt ordinances "must be limited... to those ordinances trot in WntBawith any other state law." (!d. ~ at 229.)'• What rs sue of the sutitorityofHmprotecdon disbicts to adoptordinances (§ 13861, subd. (tt)), would De equally true of its authority m establish ntles and reguladom relatinH m fin DroteNon~and outer service< Ba tzsrFt(t) t 3862(a)(t)). Both grants of aurhodry would l>e subject to the mote specific provision, of the State Hotrsirtg Law. The kgislative hisroryofehe Fre Distlict Protection Law of 1987 convin- res tuthatthe Legfslatnre never ina,+rded Cue protecdon dlsnicts to be abk to adop[ ordinances sitting fo nh building smMatds stricter that[ rhos a of the star:. As the SID which CnaC[ed diet Law (SB 515) traveled tlueugh Ure legislative process, it was amended several tlmes. As originally introduced, and prior ro rr au'v+a.riMtnmaaur0sprrrmt,<abrsr rnntep101miW dWrlm loaegxadwnm" (1]tel, wDd. ro))4 cwoaoml.ra.ar•ramouaaenur.,wuur.n uwrpee.•o.ain.an.mindty' wama r.r romd m b pearpted by rwsLw b DNwa4 rr SN aW.6I Opat11.A%.ds.6r, Ndi P9711. waom we wntluGOYW ACpw.l6. ba0 botayeoftaoura::iao 13aa3,•ampowalap fimfw6dm.WrMry nrrohbarhe uMNfwrwk. m u~a amna h.aearea .awe oedau.rah mrrp~eone oamo0ina w"+Wm• dar srr. Firemh. t, r: and t o op.GtMry.~. n. <t, even, wMn r< <mdrdcd wr.ow:mqulaMt um stave r.rs<.ae d ramu..p~o• t4.6e, Wkfi prAded a~ a dls>ta mill atryt W adiavm a rerwuiw u u o.vnmu pmpr n prva. nru amnNtr.rim,• anaraeeim Gana wu pohaxW from ae<'rw.t m e,dirrnn regPirua the ioarJlnim of . yl,aan.paaa r.t<r mervairet rmu~mq vehicle capgitet, ilaq .i0.uxuied egoipmmAheduu tuuLr hea praAVpwd the fiadar.urmwhil. erd uailervny ~crwericn. •ol g_.13 _i( i I i 126 F17 I Y c ©01;Jln~r i~`~.Y ~` .~ ~:, Sq~icmM 1989 A77UIL\EY GENERAL'S UPL~IOJ.'S INS amendments made on Apri120, 1987,scction 13R61, whi: ; defines the powers of a fire protection distri<t, contained a subdivision to include among those powers.one"(tjo adopt ordinancrs pursvantm Section 17958." Atthe request of the California Building Industry Association, me audror of the legislation reeuestrA an opinion oftegislative Counsel as m wheNv that woWd incrcasc the aurhoriry of fire prevention districts. t.egislative Counsel tetrdereA an opinion on Apri13, 1487 (k 74831 an9wving in the affmnative, saying that We sutMiviSioo would increase the caisdng auMoriryof fie potution diSMe¢ by allowing them to adopt their own, mort stringent building codes. Opposition from the Califotrtia Bur7ding IMtrstry Associaion led m the deletion of the subdivision from the Bill. (See. A ta•„ <~ op. cu. nepra, at pp. 7, 26.) "The courts Itave repeatedly concluded tlut when the Legislature has rcjectcd a spedRc provision which was pan of an as when originally intro- duced, the law as enacted shoWd oo[ be wnsatred m contain tha[ provision (Citations.]" (VenWra v.CiryofSanJaee(1984) I51 t:al,App.3d 7076,1080) 1[ will be rtcalled that ucdon 17955 aDthotizes cities and counties, (i) m make changes in slate building standards in applying than m their e>pective jutisdiotions as long as they impose the same rcquiranetus as thou adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development, or (ii) m make changes or modiRUdons In chose requirements for local cl3made, geological or mpogrnphical reasons. Whaz the afongoing legislative history teaches, is that me Legislamrc rejected the suggestion that R¢ protection districts be authorized to alter state building standards adopted tinder the State Housing C,aw at all. Thaz would certainly mean that the Legislature did not invrd fire protection districts to adopt mote strinaem buildin¢ standards than rM rhncr Of ttte Smm. (See also. Scats. 1988, ctt 1302, § 1. tupro. imvuling § 18941St As we said eari3ec, "[wlhaz riltios end counties may rcgWare with regard to building conswetion standards .. , must be disrioguished from the respon- sibi]ides of fire protection districts under me Stak Housing law." (68 Ops.Ca).Atty.Cr_a 226, 228, supra.) That faw imposes upon the chief of any Hie dcparonent or district providing Grt pro[ectioD services, and their authorized representatives, the duty of enforcing in their respective aroas "all of thou provisions of [the State Housing Law]." (§ 17962; ef, § 17966; 69 Ops.Cal.Arry.Oeu 260, 263-265 (1986).) Thal woWd include an obligation m enforce the scare building standards relating m fire and panic safety promW- gated by the Seale Frc Marshal (as well az those ofthe Deparmaetu of Housing and CommuniryDeveIopment)nnd published in the State Building Standanls Code. It would also include the obligation m enforce any'eity or county code hecanct the adoption of rftC~ 1Wffi «des ' SpcC.°~a'u'y w,upeued by provisions of the State Housing law. (§ 17958.) Accordingly, we conctude mat a fire protection district may not adopt mom stringent building reguUtions than those of the State Fue bfarsltai. b 23 n+ 1~ . -RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT DATE: June 5, 1990 T0: Chairman and Membezs of the Public Safety Commission FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OP A RBCOlRII.NDATION TO TRB CITY COONCIL RHGARDING A PROPOSBD RESOLOTION AND ORDINANCE AIDINDtlSNTS RB'QOIRING TNR INSRALLATION ~~ OP AOTOMATIC PIRR SPRINRLER3 IN RBSIDSRTLAL ~ OCCDPANCIES The following staff reports, proposed resolution and ordinance amendments are submitted for your consideration in providing recommendation to the City Council regarding the installation of automatic fire sprinklers in newly constructed single and multi-family dwellings. This matter was originally referred to the Commission by the Board/Council. On April 3, 1990, the Commission submitted its recommendation back to the Board/Council regarding the use and esFe^_ti~~:.< of automatic fire ~r.iunlers. on April 18, 1990, theme Board/Council (after considering Commission input and the supporting factual information) directed staff and legal counsel to prepare the appropriate legislative documents for Commission consideration and recommendation. Additionally, a public hearing has been advertised in the Daily Report on May 18th and 25th for your June 5, 1990 Commission meeting per Board/Council direction. Tha Building Official and Fire Marshal have jointly developed the attached reports, findings of fact, resolution and proposed ordinance amendments with appropriate direction from our legal counsel. Respectf u l ly~.~~uJbm/i~tt~e~~d/, L. D~cr'a"y ~"~ Fire Chief LDM/rb Attachments ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA~10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June G, 1990 T0: Pu of is Safety Commission FROM: Jerry Grant, Buildinq Official SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE ~~c,~.HOyc ~'~' < ' ~!> ~' ~q A ~I 6 Z _ >- 19ii I I. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Public Safety Commission review the attached proposals, ronsider any testimony received at the hearing, and make recommendation to the City Council as to inclusion of additional regulations into the Municipal Code regarding residential fire sprinklers. II. BACKGROUND: AC the City Council meeting of April 18, the Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance regarding additional requirements for residential fire sprinklers and referred the matter to the Public Safety Commission for review, hearing, and recommendation. the City Attorney has recommended that any provisions in this regard be incorporated into city building regulations, in consideration of a recent - -- _., ,...+.+_. ,.,n npc.~~gp ,n Mhpr root tru[tinn rpaulati ons t, in~the Municipal Code, relating to private pro petty, are administered by the Building and Safety Division. He has further indicated that the fire code, administered by the Fire District, should be revised to eliminate conflicts between the two codes. Since the Building Code has been developed to regulate construction and the Fire Code is a maintenance code, the recommendation is valid. Rccord ingly, the accompanying documentation includes: (a) proDOSed revisions to the Uniform Building Code (Exhibit "R") that will require installation of fire sprinklers in all new residential buildings not presently designated as requiring them by the published codes; (b) copies of two standards, NFPA 13D and NFPR 13R, (Exhibit "B"), published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), ~~ -d „ct a^.t whprp than gp5 in ihn rentpnt dre pP0DO5ed: and, (t) an•outline~Vo f~ the Dropos ed modifications (Exhibit "C") incorporating a brief explanation of the effects of the proposed changes to the Standards and the reasons for same. Public Safety Commission dune 5, 1990 RES IOENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE Page 2 It is anticipated that when conclusions are reached in the Public Safety Commission deliberations, the NFPA Standards will be rewritten as necessary to incorpa ra to concluded modifications, reformatted to be consistent with already adopted Building Code Standards and presented in ordinance form to the City Council for further consideration. f Ii. ANALYSIS: The Ci ty'S current ouilding regulations include requirements for ins tailati on of fire sorinkl ers +n +^d ^'•r dual apartment ar.d condominium buildings containing more than IS dwelling units or mare than two stories in height, and to hotels and motels co r.taining 20 or more guest rooms. The accompanying pro pasals will expand the sprinkler requirements to all other residen tiai structures, attached garages and carports, and certain other detached accessory buildings. The Standard used for installation of "conventional" sprinkler systems in currently regulated residential buildings, Unifo•m Building code Standard 38-1, is based on a third Standard, (NFPA 13), and is Lhe same as is used for commercial and industrf al buildings. the proposed Standards (NFPA Standard 13D and 13R) were developed specifically for residential occupancies up to four stories in hef ght, contains exceptions for small spaces, attics, and accessory areas, has less stringent design parameters than NFPA 13 and, in general, is more specifically oriented LO life safety than to property loss reduction. The proposed modifications to Standards NFPA 13D and 13R will, in general, remove many of the exceptions found in the printed Standards, and will add additional limita r;a^e .1.g.^_~_~ rrc;id i;,y , ;,; y;ier level or protection than the original publication. Sprinkler Drovisi on5 adopted by su rrounding jurisdictions more closely follow the published Standards than those proposed for Rancho Cucamonga, however, most neighboring cities vary in their requirements to some e zten t. Staff will be reviewing differences between Rancho Cucamonga proposed regulations and those of surrounding jurisdiction, in order to develop, to the greatest extent possible, uniformity with other cities throughout the Mest End. A compilation of differences and/or further input will be provided at the Commission meeting. IV, CONCLUSION: The proposals before the Commission are the result of a number of discussions between the Building and Safety Division and Fire District staff and represents the joint efforts of both agencies to carrying our perce!ved City Council di r,!Lt; on_ Respectfull Submitted, ~~~~ Jerr Grant ' Bui ding Official JRG/kes i-~~ Exh~~j in .,A.. PROPOSED BUILOIN6 CODE MODIFICATIONS '. Amend Section 3802 (h) of UBC as follows: h) Gro vp R, Division 1 Occuoancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 1 Occupancy as follows: in every apartment house three or more stories in height or containing more than 15 dwelling units, and every hotel three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms, the system is to be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1, "Design Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems," except [hat residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. The water flow alarm for such systems shall 6e monitored by an approved central station. 2. In all new Group R, Division 1 Occupancies, other than those specified in subsection (h) I. above, the system shall be installed in accordante with UBC Standard 38-2, "Installation of Automat+c Fire Sprinkler Systems, in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less than Three Stories fn Height." 2. .Amend Section 3902 by adding Subsections (i) and (3) as follows: (i) Grou R Division 3 Occu ancies. An automatic fire sprinkling system shall be costa a in a new Grouo R. Division 3 Occuoancies. System design and installation shall be conducted in accordance with OBC Standard 38-4, "Instal tattoo of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses." 'j) Group M. Division 1 Occu Dancies. An automatic fire sprinkling system shall 6e installed in all new Group N, Division 1 Occupancies constructed within ten feet (10'j of a residentiai occupancy. EXCEPTION: Group M, Division 1 Occupancies exempt from permit requirements by Section 301(b) 1 of the Uniform Administrative Code, as adopted. Private garages and/or carports attached or accessory to residential buildings may be su DDlied from the system serving the primary use, however, piping sod installation within the accessary portions shall be in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1. 3. Amend Uniform Building Cade Standards by adoption of Standards 38-2 and 38-3 (Reformatted and revised NFPA 130 and NFPA 13R). I 1 _ E J(1~ i D I I' .~ Copynaht t 1989 ~'FP.4, wll Ritlns Reurvrd NFPA 13D Standard for tht Iasiallalion of SpfiaYler Systems in One- and Ttvo•Ft[mily DwelliDQa and Mobile Homes 1989 Editlon This edition of NFPA I JD, Srandad fer The /nsm/lotion of50rinkln Svsaems m Ono- and 7wo-Fami(y Dwrffin8r and.Nobile Homes, wu prepared by ehe Techmcn Committee on Aa[omatic Sprinklm, rcleaxd by ue Corrtadn{ Committee ao Water Extinpdshin{ Synems, and acted on by ue National Firt Protection Astociatlon, Inc. n iu Fall Meetia{ held November 1x17. 1988 io Nuhviile, Tennessee. It wu issued by me Staadardf Caunstil on January 13. 1989, with as eBective dau of February 6, 1989, sad supenedn all previow editions. The 1989 edidoa of mu sundard hat been approved by ue American National Standards Ios[iuu. Chan{n other shoo edimrial ue iadiatM by a venial ode in We tnarpa of We Pqp on which thry appar. These lines are included u sn aid u Vu user is ideotifyin{ chan{ef from the previow edition. Orl{la aM Danb{rat of NFPA 113D Re<o{nisia{ the nmd to reduce the amud life lou from Brc is raidmtial occupancies appointed i subcommittee in Mry 1977 u ~psepare a Studard oo tht Installauw of Sprinkler Systems io Oae• and 7Wo-Family Dwelliop and Mobile Homo. The Suboom• mittec wu competed of memben of the Committee on Auumatic Sprioklm and oNer technically wmpettal experu. The standard wu submitted sod adopted at the Annual Meetin{ io Chicyo, IL oa May 13.16, 1973. The 1980 edidoe wu • complete rewrite of the 1973 edition includin{ 51 uWU when approprau, The 1980 edition amsposrtted the tpWU of de midemial spponokier ten propam admiairtercd by the National Firc Prottction AuxiattoM and fimded by ^ research pant from tht United Saw Firc Admiaatntion, Factory Mutual Punrch Corporation, astd the laa Att{da City Firt Dep-rtmmt cotWuued the dweltisy testa. Fattory Mutwl ltaapsch Corportion, McNeary Imstrmce CostsWdn{ Swim sad me Charlowe, North Carolitu Fin Deputmeot condumed the m~sbile home tuLL After pinin{ ptsniwl experimm wim the 1980 editioe, mdfi8ntiou u the staadar4 ittNtsdin{ removal of desyn pnameten for dry-pipe systemr, were made in the 198! edirion. The 1989 edition provide for the rcco{oition of mdfrteu systems, >o updau oo the n.. loves !n ono- and two-family dwtlhag, sod nd'en new {t~tda~e fbr ppltttnns~ ^f rcsideotial sprinkan ae sloped and beamed ailiap. Requ:cameaa have aao been provided for the insulation af, midential tpriaklm io 6i{h•tempmturc arch. / _ ~0~,1~,;0 ~ 2Ev 1 Sl~a ~ _ AUUED ~u~~~cwE '~'":r~~cf~(E ~~ j~"~ ^0.1 ~:>,~ iJD-D 1\Si1LLwilON OF SPa1VKLCR SYSTEMS n O4E lVD 1NPnYlU' PnELWYGS 4N0 MCaILE XOMf3 Committee on Wmer ExNnRmahinR STahms CoreelmdnR Colnmitlte Pa,d D. 5mn4 CAmrman Gage-na0ro<k b. Armcnrn inc Raasr E. SoYmea. Samarv 9auoml Ftrc Pmlanon AuxuUan IHOO.onvp Nryw E. Ault Rol(lenun a Aaaxurn Ino. n-rs,!. e.-„-!r. _:-:-.::~:;,a; pewa,rn carp, Cwmir 1. Dryau Ja MAM Proumon ConwlWma pickW )Imiwu. WO Hudson Auwmatm Spnn- 4krCory. papa H. etm Mvomrown. V! 8M W. N,pm. lames W. Noian Ca. Chnfw W. Seahmrr. ScTlnnm EnRnttnnl Cory. Techninl Committee on Ayeotpalic Sprinhhn Caawm W.9eaYaw. CAavman 3aklmlm EvDemip corp. SwlNaa L Hmrr, SKrcrary Kempr croup (Allenau to H. Wuulmlll Eenua f., !wM Dept of PuEllc Sa(mY Walm M. Nmtlm Ip Avatlea Ciry Firt DaFC. pep. FMANA JeM C.OTIaYL Gam-Raaaock t AYdtiafm Ipa. CarMa L Panma Aummwia' SpnnkM Corp of J. C Rleaal4m. NW. Rnnb [waLil W Camada Amenn E J. Ssal~. FJmemae Kaoaa Co, Rep. VFSA !. Tm SWY, L'S Fin Admieimrwiu Alwn M. CeWY, Jr, Cunm CO. Kmnerly (Vme LiWUemllD and URl Rep •IA WNIM L T.mpYA AmmcAn AYmlmne SpnetW, TNmm G. DaIY• Hdten HaNa Cory, Ilse, Mo. AHMA - lWaL0.pm.VnlonCamlOeCOrp. Wimam LTaw~CmveNl Fin Prm. 3ynema CO. ive. Pep, NFPA IFPS Rap. NFSA W J, 4MM l/ndennren Ubomm~n Iw. Ji J. W91aR UniaM Aam. of )wrneYmae ! Ap Jame R Oewpa4 wall. Amn. of Nome nml0era prtenns el tM PNmoip 8 Pip Fimy Ia0. of IM Ivou Limned la lJD UId URi V38 Goal Raene f DYa, Flrc Control Ix. WIIII~ D. RYmm Cmw Im Finn Rmawen Rdern J. GraT, Fn Syn.. lac. WRllam L WIbR FrTOr1 MmnW RmaW Carp. Rep. AFSA NaarF L Wbo1aR, 4Gery Mrhal Iowan Co. W. OmM NiRaa [anb Coney Firt Dap4 Rap MI Rep. IAFC L J. Wrllyt VedmmNmn Laaaaatarlw aPCrWa Rkarve E. Hl~aa/, I30 CwnlmmY Ret SeeeKaa D. M. YWaA ICY Aawnirta lam. RNI H. haws, Iblf lam L AmaWte lau Rap. NFM IFPS Rwnwl W. Llaaaa. IsdwnY RiY lanlan [AaY N. IJnrmra. AMtphia AWaWlit Spmr R.J.bkw.Gnpnall Firt PralMloa Byrom CO, Lrd. k4e CO. Rnp, CASA Rry. NFSA +m.axm Qriginal Poor Qua~l;y <OMMITTEf IEIWNVEL Rosa L AIbN, Ftnory Mutwl Raartt Cory. IA6max w W. E. Wilmel Da L DuA. Do. Chem:csl [o. IAltemae <v 1 L. DnRnl Tevr E, Etf1oL IevatrW RiLL ivaurtn ultemtu w K W Lvverl Dnit D. E.W. [ever fm Firt Rnetrc6 IAllenne w W. D. wtryoe) Rnxll P, FNaIN. NELL Firt Spnvtar Aav. (Altum:e :o W. Tentl Onene 6. [iYalh CnEennun Wontonn Ivc. (ARerytu w L 1. DvuAbl EtntN L [ltly, Uoda.nnn Lttonanp of Ctv. aet I Alnntu w R, 1. Wnµ0 CmW V, IawtA Xeroe Con. fAlterua tv D. M. Vulul RtJrN D. NWw, Anmae Firt $pnvtter AtEa. IAl:awte w 0.1. Oral J. 0. MnWR. NW. RnetrrL Couval IN:trme w /. K rticttrAael Nara M, MuwIL Mu.NI Q 45taov Amvmm~ IARemne to 1. G. O'Nplll Frttle J. NIEMUkt. Eatmte XOWI Co. lunnta w E, J. SAisetuerl Jattp G. Ne.LL 5. Patveet Firt Drys. IAlatvu a E. C. Btmel [ww w. O'EI.a4 Smnma EoDoeetivi Coro (Alteruu w C, w. Schirmxl Jtaa RaaK The vikiy Cory. Uhmtte w [, Streenl Xrrr SM, Ivv, Aaa. of Firt CANS ~.~!:ey:e:J W. r^NYIU XIIbOi JaY Tfrb, AWo AuwmeM Spnvkln Cv. Ultentu a L Ziameemtevl Jab lWww( TM Canton Cay. IAlurvm w T. G. DN11 JaM F. Vby XFP Spnvklm. la. (Neentn w W. Ttmp4vl wRSr A. WM1, Rolf /evav ! AEteeltln lec. IAlwna w R. K faeae) NeaeeWS El.at L NYItl, Xufha AaaL WNIEa L SMI, SoCN Awe. Rep [amsiRr nWsry a Lift !nq M. Lw. WvrmW Fin SpumE Sab5ro55mit4f a Raldntl~l Oaa~nda JtY c. o'Nt56 [Min:tat Gt5'Stpaek t Awcvt/ IK. Efwn L SWak NgMt Aaet. Lgt15 L CstiksK Rtlittlt AunmYic SreiWYt Cv.fa. Jett L DtttWf. NW. ArL of Xom NilAc+ RkStd L Nepq,150 [amsrnJ Rick SuEnwa RsW JaStw, Al1atY utvunn G, NtbLCMfS EaS, ftaay MwuY Rntrei Cap. fwa5t L LwnrkL Uvdpveean lAtarMaw Ire Rttaa L 9Ww~ NFM Sr(lwwf OnlttM faMna4 MuraM Fin EQUipavt Caps nun J, L UeYNtn. M SJatttt CoufeJ d CtetN Nay SIn. ItxL Aaa a Fin CTitM1 J, Tta SRII- US M AAWaiantiot WlSlta 4 Taa, OlifYll M rnltetin Syatn Co In W1Wta I1rM. Ktmpa GrvW WSYr M wwf, IINf !afro ted Aaa. la. Thil /ta npYrna eM aeaMahlr a tM hAa MCoraurr ett MIIaN on tM un oJrhu Ninon. Sinn tAN riaa, r.fanpr a eM memfar4r ary Mw onurnl >CliE: MembeteMp m s Cvea:C.n :uuR ::: ' .ed eI itaii wea:tuta u eedaramt of t-t Aaaoatttwe a tr aroma! EnraPN M !w Cafmttat a •f:cb Ne attmAV rra 130.3 rrflnm 13D--s INSrALI-tT10N OF YnIH%LEII rYSIFW M ONL- A.W TiPFwMnY DWfI.1.ING5 nND MCa1LE NOMES Coawb Pre6ae ............ .... ......................................U0. 5 Chapr<rl General In/ornaNoa .................. ..................130. 5 I-I Scope ................................. ..................130. 3 I-E Purpose ............................... ..................130. 5 I-3 Definitions ............................. ..................U0. 5 I-i Mamtenance ........................... ...... .. .. .. ......UD- 6 1-5 Dessgn and IDSWlation ........ ........... ..... . .. .. ... .....f30. 6 I-6 Uniu . ... ........ ........,........... ..,...............130. 6 Chapter 2 RLUr SapP1Y • . „ • . . . . . . ............. ..... ...... . ....130. 7 2-I General PNVIaIOna ........................ .... . ...........130. 7 ?-2 Water Supply Sourtts ...................... ... . . . ...........130. 7 2.7 Multipurpou Pipipg SYstcm . . ............ . .. ... . ............ .130. 7 2.4 Mobile Home Wattt Supply .............. . .. .......... . ......130. 7 Chapter 3 System Compoatem ............ . . . .... . ... ............130. 7 3-I Yalves and Drains .... . ....... . ........... .... . ............130. 7 3.2 Pressure Gaga ........................... .................U0. 7 3-3 P;ping ................................. .................130. 7 34 Pipini Support ........................... .................130. 8 3-5 SpriOklen .. ............................ .................U0. B 3-6 Alarms ................................. .................130. 8 Chaptae I Syatea Daip ..................... ........... . .... . ..U0. 8 LI Deign Ctiteru ............... ......... . ........ . .........p0. g a-2 Position of Spriaklen ............. . ... . .. ..... . .............130. 9 M3 System 7ypea .......................... ...................130. 9 4.4 Pipc Sizing ............................ ....... ........... .13b-IU 4-S Pipip{ Configuntiopa .................... .................. .13b-ll 0.6 Location of SprioklM ........ . .......... ........... . .......13D-1 l Chapter S 14Gtnad Padkatlar .................... . .... . .......ISD-12 nPPePmx A ...... .............................................130.11 Appa.dl% B RHasensed ANIOiIaY ....... . ........................13D-IB Inde% ........................................................UD-l9 trae.w~ ~ 3 l NFPA 13D Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two- Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes 1989 Edition NOTICE: An asmnsk i-i following the number or lesser designa- mg a paragraph mdica[es evplanatorr material on that paragraph m Appendix A. !nformanon an referenced pubiicauons can be found in Chapter one Appendix B. Prcfan h is intended that tNs smndard provide a method for thou individuals wishing to install a sprinkler system for addinanal life safety and property protection. It is not the purpox of !hss standard to rcgwrc the installation of an automatic sprinkler system. This sundard aaump that one or more smoke detectors will M installed in xcordance with NFPA 7d, Smndord jot the Insra(lanon. 3lmnrenaale. and L'se of Household Fire Warning Equipment Chagn 1 Ceaenl InformadM ' ' • `°` "` ' r sisyis wun the onign and in- stallation of automatic spnnkler systems for protection against the fire hazards in one- and two-family dwelling and mobile homes. 1-P Purpox. The purpoxaf this nandard is toprovidea spnnkler svsttm the[ writ aid in the detection and control of residential fires and thus provide improved protection agams[ injury, fife loss, and progeny damage. A spnnkler sysum installed in accordantt with this standard is exped- <d to Drevent dashover Itotal involvement) in the room of hr<origin. when spnnklered and to improve the chance for occupants so exape or be evacwsed. Guidcbnn arc established for the deign and imtallation of spnnkler rystems for one- and two-family dwelling an0 mobile homes. Noshing in this sundard is intended ro reunsx new sechnoloyea or alternate arnngemenu provide mg she !<rel nr safety psestribed by the dandani is oot lowered. 1-J• Dcfloitiona. Approved. Acceptable to the "aushonty having junsdic• tion.' VOTE. The Nahonal fire Protenian Aarociuson don na approve, malsect ar cem(y any imUllauona, procedurea egoipmeni, or mamruls ear don ii approve or evaluate mssmg laboramnn. In deuimmm{ the x«pubdnY of imullatioro or pracedum, equipment or matenab. Ih< authority has ing lunsaicimn may Oase xcepiance on coin- , rnroamanou plrfnce with 4FPA ar othtt appropnae sandards. In the absence of such standards. said aushonty may regmre en. Bence of proper mrW lesson, procedure or uu. The aushonty having JUndicuon may oho refer to me lishnp or hbehng pruucn of an orgamauon mncemed wnh produtt nalua- hans which a in a posrtton to eesermme <on:plunce wuh appropriate standards for she currcm produRion of fisted uems. Authority Haring Jnriadicdoo. The "aurhonty haling lunsdimion" is the orpnization, olhce or mdntdual rc sponstble for "approving" equipment, an installation or a prxtdee. VOTE: The phrau "aurhonty having lunstlichon" s used in VFPA documenu m a broad manner since Jurisdictions and 'lpproval" ageeae vary u tla then r<sponsibilnies. where pubbc sa(~ty a primary. [he "aurhonty having iuru- d:cuon" mar be a (edml. stale, local or other regional depanmeni or intlividual such as a hR chief. ere marshal. chin( of a fire prcvenvon bureau, labor tlepanmrnt. health deWrtment. budding aficial, elenncal inspenor. or others having sotwory aurhonty. For imm~mx purpose, an insur- ance impeciion QepaRment. refine bureau. or other msun antt rnrapany reprexnunve inaY M the "aurhonty having junWittian." In manr mrcumitance the property owner or hss detpnN agmi assumes the role of the "aurhonty having lunsdiaion": ai govemmem installauorta the com- mending oalccr or depanmeoul othNal may be the "author- ity hating lunsdinion." Check Vane. A valve which allows Flow in one direction only. Cwmol Valrt' A valve employed to control (shut) a supply of water [o a sprinkler system. tv..ss.,, ru.^.w'_: wiwgcsi uy an aura merle sprinkler expresxd in gsdlons per minute. Dry 5ystu. A system employing awomatic sprinklers attxhed to a piping system conminmg air under atmos• phenc or higher preuum. Wss of prcMUrc from the open- ing d(aspnnkler or dnauon of a 8re condition cauus the al<asc of wxer into the pspsng system and out the opened sprinkler. , Dtaelllaig. Any building which contaim hat more than one or two "dwelling uniu" intended to be used, rented, Icaxd, let or hired out td be occupied, or which arc occupied for habiution purposes. DwNllq Delt. pee or more rooms arranged for the ux of one or more individuals living together as in a single houxkeepirtg unit, normally having cooking, living, sari- iarv, snd slapirg fuili;lea. IaMIW. Equipment or Ingxnab to which has been attxhed a Iaixh symbol or other ideasil~ing mark of an orpnization uceptable sa the "aushonty having jurisdic• Lion" and mnumtd with produn evalwtion. Chas main- taim periodic inspection of production of labeled equip~ meet ar maanala and M whoa labeling the manufacsurcr indicnn compliance with appropriate standards or perfor- mance in a specified manner. Lb1N. Equipmens or materials included in a list pub• lished by an organ¢auort ancptabie so the "authority X35 ,saaanaw E31N1 I~sTLLL410N OF SPRINKLER tTtTFNE IH OM1E t`!O TMn.F1NILY GWELII¢Gt tin NOEI'-E HOMn having jurisdiction" and concerned with product evalua- tion. that maintains penodic inspection of production of listed egwpment or matenals and whose lining smtes either that the egmpment or mammal mee[s appropnate standards or hat been tested and found sortable for use in a specsfied manner. SOTE. The means for idenufy;ng Ilsmd egmpmem may rarv for each o.gamvimn cunttmcd uah produo evalua- tion. some of wh¢h do nov rrcogn;te egmpment a !rated unless M1 s also labeled. The "authonty having lunsd¢tion" should uuI¢e the syvem empla3<d by the hsnng organlta- tmn to identify a hstrd product. Mobile Hame. A factoq'-asumbled structure equipped with see me connttnons and made so as m be readily movable as a unit on Rs running gear and designed [o be used as a dwelling unit with or without a Foundation. ~lultipurpox Piping Svatems. Piping systems wnhm dwellings and mobile homes intended Io serve both domes- tmand fire protection needs. Preengineered System. A packaged sprinkler system in- cluding all components connmetl to the want supply designed Io be Installed according to pretested limimlmns. Pump. A mechanist device that transfers and/or raises the pressure ofa gund twatep. Rnidendd Sprinkler. An automatic sprinkler which has been specifically listed for use in residemial occupm-( Gies. Shall. Indicates a mandarory requirement. Should. Indicates a recommendation or that which is auruw uw uw ;csluucu. Sprinkler-AUtomade. Afire suppmsion device which operates automatically when its heat-atluated element is heated to or above its thermal rating allowing water to ducharge over a specific area. Sprinkler Sptem. An Intcgrarcd system of piping cron- nected to a water supply, wuh listed sprinkler that will amomahcally initiate water discharge over a flrc area. When required, the spnnkler system alw includes a control valve and a device (or actuating an slams when the system operates. Snadard, A document con4inin{ only mendatory pro- visions using the word "shall" to indicate requircmenn. Explanatory material may be included only in the form of "fine onni' noms. in fmmmes. or in an Appendis. W~terllow Detector. An elenric signaling indicamr or alarm check valve actuamd by water flow m one mrecnon only. Net System. A system employing automatic sprinklers atta<hetl to a piping system containing water and connected to a water supply sa that wamr discharges Immedia[ely from spnnkl<n opened by a fire. 1-i• Maintenamt. The owner is responsible for the con- dition of a spnnkler system and shall keep the system m normal cpcmbng condition. 1-5 Deign and IRSnI!atloo. 1-S.I De.im and Nnedab. 1-S..L1' Only new «sidenual spnnklers shall be employed in rye installation of sprinkler systems. -~-~~"~,~`~~r~, . `-^ r---.rte. ~.1.] Only listed and approved devices and approved I matenals shall b< uxd m spdnkier systems. Exception: f-fisting moy be warved for ranks pump , hang- ers Tmterffaw detKrion dn'mes. and wa(er/.'ow valves. ~~~ti-~~ w 1-5.1.3 Preengineeredrystems shall be installed within the limintions which have been esnblished by the testing labomtoriea when listed. _ > ~ 1-S.I.d• All systems shall be tensed for leakage at nomal 1 systertt operating water prcuurc. ~ £xcepnon: When a fvr deportment pumper connernon rs , prorrdr4 hydrosrorre pressure tests shot! be provided m ~ pccardance with NPPA ld. Standard for the /nrm!/anon ~! Sprink'n Syrrerru. ^~ li Uain, pdetnc amts of mcasurcmtnt in this snndud an in accordance with the modernized metric system known v Nc International System of Units (Sq. Two units (liter and barl. outride of but recognized by SI, arc com- monly used in international fire protection. These units arc listed in Table Ifi with conversion Eamon TIIW 14 Noma al Ihk Uah SymYal Cwwnha FatElr liar L I gal ~ 1.783 L paanl pa I pal ~ 6g9~ 737 h 0.0689 Dar by Wr I ~ . 103 A Far addnloaY wnvemwa aaa mmrienwe r AgfM Elm, Standard fw Nemc han.n Supply Praasan, Prnsure within the mpply (i.e., city or peyote supply water wurcel. System Preasan. A pressure within the system (i.e.. above the comrol vdve). Wuerflow Alarm. A sounding devitt attiwted by a watergow detector or alarm check valve and amnged to sound an slam that will be audible m all living arcu over background noise levels with all intervening down cloud. Ifi.l if a value for meuurcmeas u given in this snndard is followed by u equivalrnt value i0 otDm unib, the Ent sated is to be reprded u Ne rcquircmmt. A {iven equivo lem value Ivy be approximate. 1i.7 The conversion procedure for the SI uniu hit been to muhiply the quantity by the conversion tutor and Nee round the molt to the appropriate number of significant diyu. IMl seam ~ ~)Y Chapter 2 Waur Sapply 2-I Csneral Provisions. Eveq automatic sprinkler system shail base az least one automatic water supply. When stored water Is used as ehe sole source of supply. the minimum gaanun shall equal the water demand rate times 10 mm- urcs. ISre 1-r J,1 L2' Water Supply Sources. The (ollowmg water supply sources are acceptable: Ial A connection to a reliable water works system. r0r 4n eiesattd :oak. ml A pressure tank installed in accordance wnh VFP.4 13. Smndard lur Ilse !nuallauon ul Sprinkler Systems, and FPA ]]. Smndard for Ilhrrr Tanks for Prrvare Eire Proses uon. Idl 4 stored slater source with an automatically operated pump. 2-3' Nuldpurpme Pipioa System. A Piping sYst<m serv- ing Doth sprinkler and domestic needs shall be atteptable when: lal' In common water supply conntttions serving more Than one dwelling unit. 3 gpm (19 L'min) is added to the sprinkler sysmm demand to determine the size of common piping and the size of the total water supply requircmenu. Ib) Smoke d<t<eton arc provided in accordance with VFPA 73. Standard !ar the lnsra/larion..Nainsrnanee. and Ge n!"Household Fire Warning Equipment. Ic1 All plpmg ~: ;h: system conforms to the piping spttsfications of this standard. Id1 Permumd by the local plumbing or health authoritf 2-d No01M M0111e Fart! JVPP11• ..::: :•Yp:j ( - spnnklereddwelling manufactured olF-site shall no[ 6e less than that specified on the manu(amurci s nameplate. ISee r-a i!ks f.euepnon.) Chapter J Sy~tea Compoaean }I Vdm and Dnlm. }L1 Each system shW Mve a single control valve ar• ranged to shut od both the domatie and sprinkler systems. and a separate shutoR valve (or the domestic system only. Exception .VO. 1: The rprink/er rysrem pspmg may have a separasr cortrml vdve whrrt supemsed 6y Drat oJrheJDllor mq merhodr: ra; Central «asinn. proprusarv. ar remote station alarm rerv¢e. Ibl Lucal alarm semrx Char will cause rhr rounding of an audible ngnal as a conrsanrly intended pomL or Ic/ Lakmg rhr valves oprn. Esapuon .VO. '~ lrepararr shuroJJvdlvnr not requnedlor the damrroc wash tupply m mulupurpasa psptng systems. }1.2 Each sprinkler system shall have a'h in. 113 mint ar lager dram and test connection wnh valve on the system ode of the control valve. COMfONENTs wATE0. }L} Additional drains shall be installed for each trooped portion of a dry sysmm whsch is sub)ect ro freenng temper- atures. }2 Pres+un Gaga. 3-i.l A pressure gage shall be installed to mdicam a:r pressure on dry systems and on water supply Pressure tanks. Y3 Plpin{. }J.1 Prpe or tube used in sprinkler systems shall be of the materials m cable J-3.1 or in accordance with 3-J.2 through J-3.3. The chemical propernes, physsal properties. sad Afmrnsinns of the materials listed in ia61e 3-J.1 shall be at I<azt equivalent to the standards sled in the table and d<vgned to withnand a working pressure of not less than 173 psi (I2.1 barsl. T~Wa 1J.1 Mattdab aN plvuaiou ShndW Specification for Welded and Seamlm Stal Pipe ASTM 453 Wrou{ho-Steel Pipe AVSI B3610M Speafrcatiom (or Electno-gesistance Welded Stal Pipe ASTM A13i Copper Trh (Dram. Snrt less) Specifiouon (ar Samlev Copper Tube ASTM Bti $pccrfscadoa for Samlm Copptt Water Tuhe 4$TM B88 Specification for General 14qusrcmenu (or Wraa{ht Sewksa Copps arM CoppervAtby Lube AST11 9131 Bruin{Filler MeW (Clmi&atinn BCuP•3 or BCuP-a) AwS AS.g Spenfimuon for Soldtt Meal. 45.5 l lrn-Annmooy-raraae vinr }3.2 O[Aer types of pipe or wbe may lx used, but only those invmigated and listed for this servttt by a testing and inspection agency laboratory. }3J Whenever the word pipe is used in this standard, it shall be uodmtood to also man tube. }3A Schedule 10 steel pipe mry b Joined wish mtthani- cal groove coupling approved for servia with groom rolled on the pipe by an approved groove rolling machine. }l.g Fitting used in sprinkler systems shall be of [he materials laced in Table J-J•3 or in accordance wish J-3.7. The chemical Rr°pen'es. ohysical Dmperties• and dimcn• stow of the materiau iisied sa T:bla }J.3 ;hxL be at !cos! equivalem to the standards cited in the ratite. Fiuinp uud worPing plressuta nvalvedl, 6utm~eu than 173spi x12.1 ban) rnld wattt Preswrc. }}.6 Joints for the connection of copper tube shall be brazed. Excrplion.~ Soldered!omn (93.3 solder metal! may hr used /or wet-plpr ropprr rube ryvems. - ~~ iMa Eawm f3D-B IuSTALUnOV Of SraIYKLE0. SYSEMS IV OVE VVp Lw}fVMILY nWELLL`IGa AuD NOa1LE NOMn -bk }J.g hratemb aad Dimemions $IaaaaN Gst Iron Can Iron Thrndcd Finings. Class CS antl ]i0 {}'SI Blg.i Cast Iron Plpe Flznges and Fiangcd Rumgs 4]'SI BIb l Slall<able Iron Malleable Imn Threaded Fnn rags. Class LO and 300. ... {ti'SI BI6 7 Sscd awry-made''»rougm betel r~ Bustweld Fn:ngs . 4tiSI 816.9 Bunw<Iding Ends fnr Plpe. Vahes. Flanges. and Flmngs {NSI BI6'.5 Spe: rot Plping FlDings of N'rougni Cabot. Steel and 4110. Sscel for Moderate and Elewted Tempenmres . 4STM A_iJ Pipe Flanges and Flanged Finngs, Steel ~akel Alloy and Other Specul Alloys . . ANSI BI6.5 Forged Sscd Finings, Socket Welded and Threaded ...., ,,. ... . AVSI 816.11 Copper Wrought Copper and Copper 411oy Solder-)OmL Presmre Finings .. AYSI 816,32 Cut Copper 411oy $olderdolnt Pressure Finings ... Av51 816.18 ,+1.3.7 Other types of fittings may be uud, but only thox ^, mvesngamd and bste0 for this urvice by a testing and .~ inspection agency laboratory. ~_~/\ 3-a Pipine Supaon. N.1 Piping shall be supported from structural member uvng support methods comparable to lhox regmred by local plumbing codes, Exreptran. Lured prprrtg shat( be supported m ac<prdanLr wrth any IrRmg Lmnauons. J3.2 Piping laid on open )nixes or rafter shall b< secured m graven[ lateral movement. }S Sprinkkn. }5.1 Listed residential sprinkler shall be uxd. The Dols o(such a bsung shall be testy to aublish the ability o(ihe spnnklers to control r<ssd<ntial fire under sundardized fire test conditions. the standardized room fire shill be baud on a residential array of fumiahinp and finishes. Exaepnan .V'n / Resrdenrial tpnnklert shall nos be tired m do n~rrams u~/«r r .,. u.. rly."d rrD; .,~- E.r<epnon ,v'a :: Lined dn• tpnnklert may 6v used rn arcordan<e uuh 4-i? }33 Ordinary rcmpenturc rated residential sprinkler (I l5 to 170'F 157 to 77•C)j shall be installed where mui- mum amgiem ceding temperatures des nos exceed 100'F (l8'C), }3.J Intermediate rated residemial sprinkler (173 m ?25'F 179 so 10TCI~ shall be msklled where maximum amb¢m ceiling temperatures are between 101 and I50'F !39 and 66'Q. }g.i The following practices shall be obxrved when Instilling residential spnnkl<n. unless maximum expected ambicm t<mperamres are otherwix determined. la) Spnnklers under glazs or plastic skylights expoxd to direct rays of the sun shall be of intermediate lempenture classification. Ib) Spnnklers in an umennlated concealed space under umnsulamd roof, or in an unventilated attic, shall be of mmrmediate t<mperssar c!us:fi:r.;Dn. }g.5 Operated ar damaged sprinkler shall be replaced wrth sprinkler having the same performanec characteristics as original equipment. 3-5.6 Paint{og and Oroamental Flpiaha. }3.6.1' Sprinkler frame may be factory painted or enameled as ornamental finish m accordance w¢h 3-5.6.:; otherwix spnnklers shall not be painted and any sprinkler that have been painted, except for factory applied mating, shall be replattd with new listed sprinkler, }5.6.2 Ornam<ntil fiaiahes shall not be applied to sprits. klen by anyone other than the sprinkler maoufaqunq and only sprinklers listed with such finishes shall be used, 13.7 When nonmeallic sprinkler ceiling platea(escutch- eons) or recessed esavtcheons (metallic or nonmetallic) are uud they shall be IiIIed baud on inn of the asumbly as a r~iA.....a ..-~~u~ I}6• Akan. Local waxr8ow alarms shall be provided on all sprinkler systems. Exnprronr Owrllingr or mabilrhomahawcgtmokedetrc- sora rn accordance with NFPA 7I, Ssandard/or the /nssalla- nan..Hamrenance. and Use of Household £!rr Warning Equipment _ - ~ _ ~ Chapter ~ Sytum Desip 41 Drip CntMa. 41.1 Dealp DheYup. The system shall provide a dis. charge of not less than 18 gpm (68 Umin) to any single operating sprinkler and not lest than I) gpm (69 UmiB) per sprinkler to the number of design sprinkler. 41.2• NamMr of Daalp Sprlakkn. The number of de sign spnnklers shall include all sprinklm within a mmisan• meet to a mutmum of two aprtoklcn. 41.2.1 The gc6oitioo of mmpanment for use in 41.2 to determine the numberof chip sprinklm is a space Nat is completely enclosed by walb and a ttiling. The mmpan- mem enclosure may have opening ro an ad)'oining space if the opining have a minimum lintel depth of 8 in. (203 mm) from the ttiliag 41.J Walar DeauM. The water demand (or the sustain shall be determined by muhiplying the design diuharge of 4•I, I by the number o(design sprinkler of 4t.2. iMeaowi ~ 3$ 4-1.0 Sprinkler Canrege. 4-1,4.1 Resitlemial sprinklers shall b< spaced so that the maximum aria promcted by a single sprinkler does not exceed NJ sq h 113.3 mr). L L4.2 The maalmum distance between spnnklen shall not nceed I' R 13 7 ml on or between pipelines and the ma.alm um distance to a wall or parnuon shall not exceed 6 ft ~ 1.3 ml. The minimum distance be-,ween sprinklers wnhln a companmen[ shall b< A (t C.3 ml. 7-1.5 Th< minimum 0pentlna nrcssure of am sprinkler shall be m accordance with the listing information of [he sprinkler and provide the mmtmum Oow tarts spec;fied m i-I.I. 4.1.6 Apphcauon rafts. desgn areas, areas of coverage. and mmtmum devgn pressures other than those spenfied .n 3-I.I, a-I '. 3-1.J. and !-L5 may be used wrth special spnnklen which have been hared for such specific rcuden- ual msnllapon conditions, Z2 PosiNan of Slsriakkn. 4-2.1 Pendent and upright sprinklers shall be positioned so that the d<Omors ar<wuhin 1 to O In, 12A4 to 102 mm) from the ceding. E.rcepnom Special resldenria( spnnk/err steal( (u intrafled m amardance xrrh the luung hmuarmu. 4-2.2 Sidewall spnnkkrs shall b< positionM so that the degmors are within 4 to 6 m. 1102 to 152 mm) fmm the ceiling. E.rcepbon. Special rendenua/ tprmk/nt shalt be inrmlfed m accordance wuh the haring limnanoru. a-aa- npnnkl<n mall to postponed so that the mponu pine antl dluharge are not unduly aRem<d by ohstrudiom such as ceiling slope, beams, ar light fiztum. 47 System Types. 43.t Wet-Pipe Systems. A wet-pipe system shall be used when all piping a installed in areas not sublet to freezing. 41.i Dry-Pipe Srit<ma. where system piping is located m unheaed area subject [o freezing, adry-pipe or anti- freeze system shall be used. Errepnon. Gmrd standard dry-pendent ar dry sidewall spnnklen maybe evended info unheated onar nor intended for hung purporrr. 4-7.3 Anrlheett Sritenn. I a•JJ I Eseflnltlon. An artifrccu system k one edinluvina amamat Ic spnnklen attached to a piping system containing an anpfreve solution and connected to a water supply. the antifreeze :uluuon, followed by water, diuharyes immedi• ately from sprinklers opened by a fire. 4JJ.P Where Usd. The uu of antifreeze salutioouhali be m conformity with any state ar local health regulation. 47.7.7 Aotlfreen Solutions. 477.7.1 When sprinkler systems are supplied by public x ater cannedlons the use of anufreae salutiona other than IJD-y water solutions of pure glycerine IC.P. or G.S.P. 96.5 percent grade) or propylene glycol shall not be permuted. Suitable glyttrine-water and propylene glycol-water ml.a- tures are shown in Table a.;, 7, 7, I, Lille F].J.l.l Aetl(reeu SalaNona to a C'aed if Po61k Wittt is Connected to Sprinkkn Speciac Fre<aing Sdapoa GnYiry St Point .NUerlu IkY J'olamel 60•F nS 6•n •r Glycerine 50%Waur LIJJ -IS -]6 1 C.P. or U S.P. Gnd<' 7076 Water 1151 - . - ]U.U 70nb Water LInS -!U -l0 0 Hydrometer Scale L0001U 1,_'00 . Propylene Glycol 70% Water 10'_' - J - I _`.3 60%Water 1,037 - 6 ?LI 50%We[er LOaI -76 -J2.) JO%Wahr LGJS ~-60 -51 1 Hydromeer Scue 1.000 to L-001SufAivmons 0 t10-7 . C.P. -Cryem:ylY Part. V.S.P.-UmUa Sutra Pbarm cpoeu %.5% 43.77.2 If public water is not con0ected m sprinklers, the commercially available materials indicated in Table 4.7.).),2 ue suitable for use i0 antifreeze solutions. 41,J.7~• ,An antifreeu solution shall be prepared with a frc<zipg point below the expemed minimum temperature (or the lonlity. the specific gravity of the prepu<d solupon shall be checked by a hydromaer with soitable scale. TaW 4•IJ.J.l MtlMtt Soklka to M CW U Paklk NLta b Uq CratsMM ro SpNrkkn Slreifie Freniog Melseial SnMlna Gmlry M Polo far Ftgasttl 6PF(IS.f•C~ •F •C Glysmne 1(glyctne< is used, to Table 4-7.7 3,1 DiMYleoe Glyrasl 50% Weer 1.078 - I J - 25.0 IS%Water LORI -27 -32.9 JO%WUer L096 -42 -4L1 Hydromeer Stair 1,000 b 1.1201Subdiruioos 0.001) ENylenr Glycol 61M Wuer 1.036 - 10 - 2JJ 56%WUer 1.067 -20 -'_q.9 51%Wnv 1.069 -30 -)44 a7%Wettt ! ^73 -40 ~ 40.0 Itydroartkr Svie i.uitl m t.1201Sumsvurons 0.0021 Propylene Glycol If propylene glycol is used, are Table 4-J. J, 7.1 Cuttium Chloride LO faGll per 90%"Flake" ill of Wrier Fin Prmanon Gmdr 2.gJ LIg7 0 -17g Add mrrorion ioDiDitor 7.78 1.212 - 10 - 21. ) of sodium bkbromat< Jg9 1,277 -20 -2q.y yr oz pu VI weer /.J7 1358 - 70 - )a a 1.77 1.271 -.IU -A)11 497 I2B] -50 -aSn •Fraa lmm m%emum Sh1onG aM ghee impunl:n 3q id»laar 73D-I O IVTFeLLAT10N OF SIRINILIFR SYSrEM31N ONE 1.YD 1W FaMILY DWELLINGS ..VD MOaItE NOMES 4.1.3A' Arnlyement of SagP17 %piY oaf Va1re1. All permrtttd antifreeze solur'ons are heavier than water At the paint of con[aa finterfacel the heavier liquid 'ill be below the lighter liquid m order to prevent dilfusian of water into the unheated areas. In most cam. this necessitates me use of a 5-ft 11.5-m1 drDP P1Pe or U-IODP as dlwtntcd in Figure 4-33.4. The prekrretl arrangement is to have she sprinkler below the mmdace between the water and the antifreex< soiuuon. If sprinklers are aMve the interface, a check valve with a ii-in. ~ 0.8-mini hole m the clapper shall be provided in the C-loop. A water control valve and two small sDlutio0 test waives shall ne provided as illustrated in Figure 4-3.3A. An acceptable arrangement of a filling cup Is also shown, wM.. NatR: CNMa vMw MSV a Om~nr4 Wlrl fenMNn 4,3 aRl> Lrwl or vx+• InaN.um .:' .,. n ~ ~ I npl :REaaTEo el»es v3i•1 - Itl]I~NaNInCI.ppNl hM~Te nl.al 40TE: Tne '1u-In. 10.8-mini hole m she chink wave chp. pe: rs needW to aHDW espammn of the solution dudlq 4 temperature nu and inns Prevent Mmage to spnnkkr heads. F0, $I i,m13 I II'. :! ~ mm' I n • n 1NC - Figure 47.7.4 4rteegeMet a SRPN7 PINY W a''EI..a. a3.3.5• Testing. Beare (reezin{ weather euh you, the soiuuon In the entire sys[em shall W emptied into convL• inert container and brought to the propu specific gravity by adding concemmted liquid u neMed. The resulting solution may be uud to refill the system. H Pipr Siring. 14.1 Piping shall be sized in accordance with 4-4.7 and 4.4.4. I( mare than one deign diuhar{e is required (see 6/ !), the pipe vnng proccdu2 shall be repeated for euh d<vgn discharge. Exception: When plying Is si=ed hydraWfzallY, Calculanoro shol(be made in amordance wuh the merhodr described m S'FP.UJ. Standard for the lnsra((onon of Sprinkler Sysemr 44.2 Minimum %pe Sitt. i-0.2.1 Minimum pipe size. including nipper piping, snail be '/. m. 119 mm7. Ex;epuon: 3ltntmun: v:e ofsleel pipe shat! be / in /351 mm/. /-a.3• 7o dze piping for s)siems connett<d to a city water supply, the Following approximate method is adoptable. This procedure cahoot be used for gridded or looped twee stems. Hydraulic calculation procedures in accordance with Chapter 7 of NFPA 13 rot grid-type or looped systems shall be used, ia) Establish system Oow rate in ucordance wiM Section 41. Ibl Determine water press Lrc iD the street, (cl Select pipe size. Idl Deduct miter presue Iosm if any. [See Table I4.J/d1.J (e) Deduct presstsrc loss fcr elevation. (Buildio{ height above street in ft x 0.434 - qi.) (Building height above street in me[en x 0.098 -ban.) IQ Dedutl pressure losses from the L;ty main to the inside control valve M multip lying the faMOr from Table 44.7(x) or (bl by the toW ten{:it(s) of pipe in ft (ml. (ToW length includes equivaent length of fitnnp u determined by applying Table 4-4.3(c).J 1{) Dedum Pressure total for piping within building by multiplyio{ fattor from Table 7-d.Ifal nr rhs L., ... ~:•,_I, l.oaw in it tint or tun six of pipe between the control valve and Ne farthest sprinkler. (h) Deduct valve and fitting ]rcsurc losses. Count the valves and fitting from the control valve m the farthest sprinkler. Determine the equivalent length for euh valve and fitting ss shown in Table 44 )(cJ and add these values to obtain tfie ttnaf equivalent bmph fm each pipe siu. Multiply the equivalent length fnr euh sift hY the factor from Table 4-4.3(6) or (b) end taal these value. (i) In mWtJevel bWldiop• sups (q through (h) shah be repeated to size piping for ach g3or. U) If the remaining pressure is leu thaP the opentln{ pressure establiutcd by use tgtio{ labonmry for the sprin- kler bein{ used, a redni{o is ntte pity. If thin preswrc is hi{her Chao required, srrulkr pipiry may be wed when justified by calculations. T~6N MJ(U PiarEln Law INlrhl StaEa.r N Sesd %pa. C .131 17aW Rtw • GPM Plp gltt la. 10 R U If 1/ ZO S! M 73 N b }1 I 0,04 0.03 0.07 0.09 0,11 0.17 0.20 0.26 0.77 0.01 0.}t 0.71 I'4 0.01 001 0.02 0,02 0.07 0.07 0.03 0,07 0.10 O.12 0.13 0.19 I'h 0,01 0.01 0.01 001 001 0.02 0.02 0.07 U.OS 0,116 0.07 0.09 s. - - - - - 0.01 001 0.01 0,01 0.02 0.02 0.07 For SI l:nnr I gEl • 1 r0 1. I pa • 0 0619 wr. I 0 - 0,)011 m. tw Ewl.en O SMTEN DESIGN )3D-I I T~bk H.Ab) Prpnn Laver (pUnl Copper Lblq-Typo K 4 t M. C . ISB Flow Pate -GPM Tubing Typr Sire in. 10 12 U Ib IB 20 ES JO JS q 43 50 N 0.08 U.12 0,16 010 015 O.JO O.ab 064 0.85 - - - L OIO 0.16 0.18 0.2J 029 0.35 OSJ 0'S 100 - - - K U 13 0.18 024 0. )0 U.)8 0.66 069 0.9] 1.28 - - - I N 0 02 0.07 0.04 O.o6 0.07 0.08 O.I3 0.18 0.:6 0 30 UJB U 16 L 0.03 0,04 0,05 0,06 0.08 O.I O O. I S 0 20 G 77 0 75 0.63 Q.51 K 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 OII 017 0,'_J O11 OAO 0.50 261 I'. N 0,01 0.01 0,02 OA2 U.OI 0,03 0.05 0.01 0.09 0.11 OIS 0.17 L 2UI G.GI 002 0.02 0.0J O.OJ 005 0.07 0,10 01'_ 016 019 K O.UI 0.01 U02 0.02 O.OI 0.04 GOb 0.08 0.11 0.17 01] 020 P: M - OOI 001 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 OOl 004 005 0,06 008 L - 0.01 001 0.01 0.01 001 O.W 0.03 0.06 005 004 008 K - O.OI 001 0.01 0.01 0,02 0.02 0,07 0.05 OA6 007 009 - \1 - - - - - - 001 O.CI 0.01 0.01 O.U2 0.0_' L - - - - - - OAI 9.01 0.01 O.OI 0.02 V,0_' K - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 001 0.01 002 0.02 For 51 Cmn: I pl. - J.'85 L I pw • O.o689 brr, I ft • O.llkl m LbM H.llt) ErdnMst LsMa of Pip it FEN fat Slrl W Coppr F{mrp W sSlyb Elapwr Tees Ytlres Fienq/Y'nlee Flow Fbw GIaM Oirwre 11 9B Sag Tan TAn "Y^ Is. Grrrrs OrCrrr IWir krrrk Rr Cab Aalpa GbM Prikrr Cack Crick I 2 I 6 i I 10 21 II J i 11• I ) 2 3 2 1 12 ZB IS 4 a 1". 1 6 2 U )5 IB I'h 2 4 7 B 7 2 IB Ol 6 6 2 i 5 3 10 7 24 57 28 ] 8 s...n ~. rna r.~mm~l v.m v~ tin For SI L'na: I a • 0 NW m. ~ IThn is bnea upon iEe rnma lou Ibroopb W ring beiq :raepeoant or Ib<C Fraor rrulrbk to me p:p:va) (kl The remaining piping shall he sized the time u the piping eo the farthest sprinkler unleu smalltt sun arc Justified by calculations. Exception: For sprink/ered dwellings manufactured oBntr, the mmrmum prruurr needed to mnsfy the rynrm dtsign oireria on Ihr.rysnm ride of rhr mesa shill bespeci/rd on a darn place by rh<manufacrum. /Set Srclion 1-d.) TrkM 4L1(q Harr Lasses r Rassr Minn Prrsrssr Lau (ell Mnr Flw 1a) 2J K 9 11 IB 36 4 8 9 IJ 1~ 2 3 1 4 I'rl •• 1 2 3 1 .. .. 1 HA To size piping for systems with ao elevated sank, pump, or pump•tink combination, determine the pressure at the wrttt supply outlet and proceed through steps (c). (el. (g), (h), (i), Q), and (k) of 4.1.3. 45 Hplq CoeBgrarbr. Piping configurations may be t-6 Lorsb. of SgrlrkNn. Sprioklen shall be instilled in all areas. ' Exnptian Na. l: Sprinklrn may 6r omitted from bath-~ rooms nol exceedl'ng 53 sq JI (J.! m') wish noncombwnble plumbing furuns. :} I Excretion No. 1: SprinWm ma br omitttd from rural! . , clorets whin the lens! dimtnrton does rtol exceed 3 Jr /0.9 m/ 6 10 and Ihr peen dory oar exceed 11 rqh (1,1 m') and rhr walls 1 7 and ceilingds art surJactd with noncombtutible or bmurd 2 7 ramburriblr mdtrria6 as defined by NPP,f 11p. Standard nn NOTE. NI nprerwr lorw TYprs of Building Comtrurtlon. in pkre ofinme r epmau by IM msrfsrnm Na14 M reed prlMd .n ur ubk. lu.rr purest bin m.r M urn Exrr non No. 3. S nnklrrr ma br omilred rom m rr. ~ Ah e6v<mN°^i.imum nW Hof amlle n~..IkENrm~elm. open Ctrarhrd paR'hrt, ra/parD. and similar rirycru~r. g "W ukn I pr. For 51 Umu' 1 Wm • 3 ]p! Vmm; I m. • 35 4 mm. ~ EKrpllpn No. 1.' SDllnklrlr may br Omlffrd Jrom arcs. /'~' ( pus torso 13D-12 nsrntunen or srurvxtsa svsrew 1n onu rrvo craw/spaces, and other conreaftd tpaert that are not tired od intended far Imrtg purpares or trorage. E.rrepnon Sb ' Sprinklers maybe omitted from entrance jocers Chet art oat the onk means of eg.ess. Chapter S Relerenced Publiatbas 5-1 Th<followmg documents or portions th<re0farcrefer- enced w'nhm tNs standard and shall be considered Dart of the regm¢ments of t0is aocument. The Wisioa ird:u:cd far each reference is the current edition u o(the date of:he SFP4 issuance of shis document. 51.1 NFPA Publkadons, National Fire Protection Asso- nation. Batten march Park. Quincy. MA 02269. SFP.4 I7-1989. Standard for the /nstalfgtwn of Sprinkler f Ss:vems V FPA ?2.1987, Standard for Water Tanks for Prlvafe Fire Protecton NFP,4 74-1989. Smndard for the 7nftalfation, .Naintn I name. artd L}e of HouseholdFire Warning Equtpmem NFPA ?]0.1985, Smndard on Tvprs of Building Conssnu- non. 51.2 Other Codes aed Sbaaar4. 51.2.1 ANSI Pablindons. American National Standards Insntutt. Inc.. 1450 0roadway, New York, NY 10018. ANSI 816.1.1975. Cast lion Pipe Flanges and flanged Fittings C/ass ??. 125. ?50 and 800 ANSI 016.3.1985..Nallmb/r fron Thrtaded Fittings, `.4N8f Bf6.4-198?. Cott Iron Threadrd Finings. Cfasus !_'? and 'S0 ANSI BI6.5.198s. P1pe Flangrt and Ffgnged Fieingt ,4NSI 816.9-1986, Factory-:Nadr Wrought Steel Bush welding Fnungs ANSI B 16.1 I -1980, Forged Steel Flntngs. Sakes-Wilding artd Threaded .4 NSI BI6.18-1984: Cast Copper Alloy SdM Joint Pnt• sore Frtnngs ANSI 016.22.1980. Wrought Copper and Cappn Allay Solder Joint Pressure Fittings ANSI 016.25-1486. Buawrfdirtg Ends ANSI BJ6.IOM-1985, WrfdN and Seamlar Wrought Steel Ptpe 51.2.2 ASTM Pabllntbes. American Socigy (qr Ttating and Mammals, 1916 Race Streit, Philadelphia, PA 19!05, ASTM ASJ-1987, Standard Spntfration for Pipe, S(n!. ela<k. and Hot-Dipprd. ZinnCaasrd Wrfded and Smm(ess Sree( Pipe ASTM AIDS-1986. Standard Sprrifrar(on for Eleclnr Rerstanre•sfelded Stee! Ptpe ASTM A23a.1987, Smndard Sprrlfu'asion for Piping fit- tings UI siYOUgM Carbon Steel and ,Alloy Snrl for .Nod~mn and Elevated Temprrgturn ASTM A793.1985, Sprcijrcarion for Bfack and Hoo- Dipped Zinc-Coated Welded and Seamless Ster! R'pr for Fire Proteruon L'se ASTM 832-1987. Standard Sprctfieation far Solder .Metal. 93-5 !Tin•Antimany-Grade 95T.A) ASTM 87 Y1981, Standard Spea%sc'gnan for Seamless Copper Tube ASTM 088-1986. Standard Spenficanon for Seamless Capper Water Tube .45TH 0251-7987, Standard Spenfirauon for Gen¢ral Regwrements for Wruughs Seamless Copper and Copper .Allen' Tube ASTM EJ80.1986, Smndgrdfor ,Nettie Procure. 51.23 AWS Pabhotioa. American Welding Society, 550 W LeJeune Road. Miami, FL 33135. AWS A5.8-1981. Speerfuadon !or Araunq Filler .Metal. Appendix A Thu Apprndu v,wt a pan oJiM mrwmnenu oJthu NFPA aorv,arm. Dw u au/adad/ar ~nlormarwn purpwu aNy. A-1-1 NFPA 13D is approprum (or me Protenion against fire hasards only io 00o- and two-family dwellistgi and mobile home. Rnidrntial ponioos of any other building mry bt protected with midrntial spriohlm in ucordance with 3-11.2.9 oP NFPA 13-1989, Standard for the /nstalla- tiort of Sprinkln Syrtemr. Other portiow of such buildings shoWd be protenM io accordance with NFPA f 3. The criteria in this suadud arc baud oo fWhraale fin snit of roams coetaioin{ typical fumish:ttp (ouod in reaiucuu.: u,.ua ...:.~.%. ~~ y.-" "a wtm..w,. TM Ftr_ niminp were artaggtd as typiplly fond in dwelling uoiu in a manntt simibr to Nat sbown iq Fi{ures A•1.1(a), (b). and (y. Sixty fWl-scale fire testy were Conducted in a two-story dwellio{ io [m Aageks, California and 16 tests were conducted io a 14•ft (4.}trim) wide mobile home io Charlotte, Norm Cuoliot Sprinkler rynema designed and imtalkd accordiu{ m cola aundud are expected to prevent Bamover wimio me compartment of oripe if sprink'sm art insW led in the computmrnt. A sprinltler syncm daigxd and installed accoMitq to cols snodarC cannot, however, bt complttely expec[ed to eoatrol a fin iovolvin{ unusually higher average fuel loads than typical for dwelling ueits ~ I O qi (0.7 brill +~ when the iotmwr BeiW his ae ueuswlly hi{h Bamc spend olio{ (greater shoo 123). For protection of multifamily dtvellinp, rcfa to NFPA 13, Standard for thr Inrtnllalon of Sprinkln Systcmt, or NFFA i 3R, SsandarJ fa !hr Jnxallmian of SnrinWn Sw- (rma in Rrtidrntia! Qmpanttn up to Four Siuries lA Height. A•1-3 Itnb d Ptbtatslba. Vuiow leveb of fircsafety an available to dwelling skcupaob to provide life safety aed progeny protection. This standard recommrnds, but does not requtrc, sprio- klerin{ of all arcu in a dwelling it pnmiy spriohkn to be omitted m certain arcn. These great arc the ones shown by NFPA statistics (set Table A• 1-1(a)j to be the onp where the ssw aason i ~a- eFrtNOtz A 130.17 Mooil. Mom. B.boom N ,_..~ cw cww~n, NB N.M Ba..a 0 CrNwr N Wgnt SlNa CN Cnnt L Lwn9 For fl UnN' I m.~ EfA mm. FIEmL A•1-$U E.499m. L~vlrpropn i 19nrtian O SNIn.IN CW GlrgirB o aNwr c a.ir B Bb For fl Vlnn; 1 i., ~ 13A mm. ilpe A-1.1(q McNN Her letror. E - EIM TeMe C1Y - CunMm l - iamo O - BprinelN FN 31 Up1\ I III. ~ $f.9 mN. ~-3 I7D-14 I\SALUi104 OF SeRINRLE# SY4ENE IN OHE- AND TM?iaa11LY DWELLINGS AND MpILE IIOML ittcidencc o! life lass from firs rn dwellings is low, Such an Guidantt for installation of smoke detemorn and fire approach produce a reaso0able degree of firnafety. Great- detection systems may be found in NFPA 74, Seandnrd for er protection to both life and properly wdl be achieved by the /nstaftmion, .t/mnrenonce. ant Cse of Household Fire spnnklenng all areas. Bbrmng Egwpmenr. Tbk A-1-'tlal Carnal Fasnon h One- avd Tro-FndlY Dwellip Fires W hxR CamN the w Moee Dnlha Area of OnVn Form or Heat of IµMVo ia.mgftwm 11% Smokivg Mnesds )64 Bedroom _'% Y.at from Fuel - Firt or 254 IG:chen 154 Powered ObJecr Aonge Area ~% Baud or. 6066 inctQcnts Hnr from Mixellaneow I S% Based o0 5016 ivddrna Heating Egwpmtm Room )% where area of urigrn was Opn Flame (Including where form of heat of Structural Area '_4 reponcd Matchl ignition wss reposed Other Areas g% Hnt from Eiettnral li% EquiDmrnt Aran{ or Fanv of Maunal Ignited Ovenoad Fumnurc 274 Hot Objects Inducting )% BNding 18% Property Opmtsng Combwtibk Liquid or Gas 174 Elected ui nit ~ ~ Ivtenor Finish 94 Bned oo SOSO:nLitlenu Olh4 74 SvumuW Member 94 wnert tong of malarial ToW vumber of inddeou Wsstc, Runtish a4 Igmled wss reported «posed t7Dthmg on a Perroo 731 10.191 Caokity Matenals )4 Elemrid Inaulniov 23i CDrwm, Drapery 2% Omer 104 Souris'. FIDO Dais Bax l9)) to 1983, BFPA Fire Andyau Depvtnnet. LW MI.2(-) 19110-M OaR- ant T`o•FUIh Dw3Wap ant MatsBe Hera •,nN Asaepn Firtf-Si1,000 Cirillu DaasM-),9N C'Irlllu {a~Ma-Ww Pawata{n y Arr MOaWa Ain u10r1{la (901 Cdal CMIW Daa1b IUn{ faa RYWaV !'h3a CbiBaa bf~W Living room, den, lounge 1141 301 11.6 21.9 Bedroom Rl-22) 23,1 11.6 20.9 14mhen 123) 13.0 20.6 27.5 SrruuuW Area pb791 S.t 13.3 7.4 (Crawl span 17111 113) (33) (2.9) IUmpenfied 17911 (1.0) (LO) 10.7) ~BalcanY. porch 02)1 10.9) ll.l) 10.9) (CedinVFloor assembly O7ry 10.1) 10.0) (0.5) ICedmV0.oof assembly (till 10,61 t2.3) (O.i) lWdl as¢mUy 173!1 (0,61 12.0) IO.t) Dtmnt room R71 2.7 IS 1.6 Means{equipment room (62) 1.9 7.7 ).6 8athrxm 12!) 1.2 1.7 1.9 Htllwrv, corndor 10i) 0.9 1.1 Gan{e'Ip) LI i.a li Innnor nurway 107) 1.0 0.1 Qi Clsun lit) 0.9 13 IJ qMr kntswn unVt area 13 26.6 7.3 (Chimney 15111 IB.3) (1g,9) (0.1) Multiple ueu 1971 O.A 0.7 0.6 UMIwi03d. eat appliu0k 198-99) L3 L0 0,6 ToW: 100.0 100.0 100.0 • pas Iw1 lalude dwdlin{ yrapa coded ss vnwnr typA wbWf n a bits na.M. f,{). LIB sMa aaaan ~ 1' 1 A-1-3 Svstetn conmpl valves should be of the indi<anng rvpe, such at plug valves, ball salves, butteAy valves, or O.S. & Y. gate valves. A-Id The responslbdity(orpmperlymaintmnmgaspnn- kler sy stern Is the obligation of the owner or manager who should untlerstand the spnnkler system operatition. .4 mini- mum monthly maintenance program should include the lollow mg: lal Visually mspe<t al! spnnklen so ensure against ob- str]cuon of spray. ibl Inspect all vah'es to assure that they are open. ICI Ttat all wditrflOw dtv i<Ga. Idl The alarm system, d installed, should be tested. NOTE: When rt appcan likely thin the tat wdl result in a response of the fire department. nobhcahon to ti:e fire depu:mem should be made poor m the test. el Pumps. where employed. should be operated. ISee ,1'FPS 70. Standard for the /nsrallarron a(Cenrn/uga/ Fire Pumps.) If) The pressure o(air used with dry systems should be checked, Ig) water level m Wnks should be checked. Ihl Car< should be taken to see that spnnklen are nor painted either at the lime of installation or during subu- quent redecoration. When painting spnnkler piping or painting m areas next tG spnnklen. the spnnklen may be prottcted by coveting wr[h a bag which should be removed Immediately alter pmnnng has been finished. Iq For funh<r mformatton see NFPA 13A, Rrrommrnd- rd Procure for the /mpearan. 7es(mg artd .Nalnfrnanre of Sprmklrr Scnems. Ad-5.1.1 At least three spare spnnklen of each type, temperature rating. and pnfice size used in the system should be kept an the premisa. When fused spnnklen art replaced by the owner. fire d<panment, or othen, care should be taken to assure that the replacement spnnkler hu the same operating charactenstica. A-I-5.1.1 Testing of a sys[em can be accomplished by filling the system with water and checkin6 visually for leakage at each joint or coupling Fire department connection arc Dot required for systems covered by this sundud, but may be insWkd at the dlscretton o(the owner. In these case hydros[alic tan in accordance with NFPA I7, Standard for the fnrsallarron of Sprinkler Svrrems, arc required. Drp systems should also be tared by plain{ the system !inder a!r prts!urc. Any hak shat raulu in a drop in system pressure greater roan Z pst td.16 burl io 24 houn should be corrected. Check for leaks using soapy water brushed on each joint or coupling. Leaks will be fhawn by the practice of bubbles. This tat should be made poor to concealin{ of PIDtn{. IJD-IS Mon Cnv Gve vam° ro GOmeanc ~ 5vnein Nam Gg~ V pi /' va~..e Ware Gnme,o[ 'RUpber FKM Me:r Sr~a:-oM CnK4 vane Prawre Gage va~ve 'Nater F~ow no ieL ~°C;F Connection Pretture Gage Ta Au;ometic ~ SOr.nt'.er As:em Firye AQ-2p1 Presmak ArnnKrnent. Cnv Water Main C.h GOa Valve ~.Grv GUe Varna Spnn4ler Control valve •RunMr FKM IGOUOn, Waur Chttk Valn Ralomta ]4 L Meur E¢epnon No 11 PrK[un GaQf 6nme4T ---Wem F~ow I ,~Snuo-on T valve Gr,~n,na r.n arecto ro AummK¢- -~ ro Domeanc ( Sonn4u. ~ 9vnem sw;em Fl{v e A-2.2sa1 AKVFteak Arnye seer. Wsnr Man City Gate Va~ve WaIK Flow Water Daltttor Epnnklar Maur Prnwu Gaga \ Control Valve Main Control IDpuon: RagrMtl ~ Valve r„ A.y!unat! ~ t Spr~n4ur aystun~ ~S II pa t t c.cm`ene Np.n RI Ta Gm 5 [um[•,,~ r ~~ ~ -v T T --- ~ Domnne A-2-t Connmion for fire protection to city maim is oRen subject to local regulation concerning metering and backs gow ev '1 1 Prawn Gaga -Snut- Drun area Tau Vuva Gonnttuon 'RUbbK FKM G4K4 VaIVa pr ention requm<mm[s. Preferred and ucepnble •RVtwo FKap chtt4 vuvn Optional. water supply urapgemenu arc shown in Fi{tiro AQ•1(p, Ibl. and (cl. When a meter must be uxd baween the city FI{re bA21e1 AecgtehM Aneegeaseet. s ~s Isneeaen I3D-16 I~xTAt1ATION OF SrRINXLFII $YeiEA15Ix nNE~ ~Rp rwur~MILY OwrLLINGS axp Mpalle NOMEt water main and the sprinkler system supply, m acttptable arrangement is shown m Figure A-2-2(c). Under These circumsanm. [hc Now ehanetenstics of the meter must be included m the hvdmulic calculation of the system. (See Table I-t3ldt.J When a tank is used for bath domesti<and fire pmtecnon purposes. a low water alarm actuated when the water level Ealls below i 10 percent of the minimum quantity sp«tfird in Sermon bl should be provided. A-2-3fq In dwellings where long-term use of lawn spnn- klen ucommon. proviron should be nape Eor such usage. A.}5.6.1 Decorative palming of a residential sprinkler is not ro be confused with the temperature idemifintion colon as referenced in 3.11.6 0(VFPA 17.1989, Srpndpn! for the lnsrpllpnon of Sprinkler Svnems. A-}6 warms should be ofsulficien[ intensity ro be dwriv audible in all bedrooms over background noise levels wiN all inmrvemng doors cloud. Tha tests of audibility level should be condumed with all houuhold equipment that may be m operation at night in full opentipp. Examples of such equpment arc window air condrtionen and room To far+nNn Ten~aNnna eMMi snvwRrnX~a nww•aa: aM rn~a4Y Owrn n YXAM IIauN N nA1n11Y aW. ruwn Mwn Figan MS-Na). rn.rr rises -. spehM rrywia % apnYY R.X X LMry aan aas NII nwa.», humidifies. When oN-premises alarms ar. provided, at least water Now and control valve position should be monitored. Al•1.2 It is intendtd that Ne design area is to include the two adjacent sprinklm producing NL grptHt water de• mend within the romWSment. It B also ip[ended tlut the number of design sprinklm is limited to a muimum of two sprioklm even if [hert arc more than two sprinkles in the compartment, except ss noted in A-0.2.3. A+2.3 Firc testing hss indicamd the nttd to wet walls in thr arcs pmtec!ed M• :aidzmiat sprinkles as a level closer to the ceiling than that attamplished by standard sprinkler distribution. Where Deams, light fixtures. sloped ceilings, and other obstruttions occur, additional raioential sprin- kler wdl be necessary ro achieve proper rnponu and distribuliop. In addition, for sloped ceilings, higher Naw rates may be needed. Guidance may be obtained from the manufatturcr. A cries pf 33 ful4scale tens Overt recently ronducned in a tat rpom of 12 ft x 2a R (3,6 m x 7,2 m) Naor area to dC.ermip< the eBect of cathedral (sloped) and/or beamed ttiling ronsimLlion on (ari rtsponae residential sprinkler aw OrnnrM oR.w Nr Lw.+rv IR tMwH. owir a www MYa nas.wuw Wr. rVUrr ~~ Ta n.wa F~ A-b3(kk x ew.... • ,___--____x are... wan awX XUMa4w a xna~w --~--~~~ XiRM arw X LYn4r '--LRwYy • X ryrrya RaT X pq Rwn Figre A•L3(ck ~~ ,vrevoa / ~~ l / x~mmi o.,v ,/ n,em : ~os~,l Mn sin. i}OSmml L~nsl y aw oammq , Figure /a-t.2(al Sprinkler DesiBo .areas fw Typiol Ryideonel Occupaory. T~64 A-42~ Medmu Dishvee nom Spdekln Denatlw to B<tnm of C<Itlva OMnmlbv Dbrxoce hom SpisYMr to Slde W Ceilleg Obusmtloe MAximam Dlsnnce (~ ~naltvm Wt~w fegiq OMtrvrdm Les than b m. y'ot pennrtmd 6 m. to less than I R 01n I ft ID less then 2 (t I m. Z h to less than : R 61n. 2 ic6io. io nu ihanJR Jm. J h ro less than 3 (1 61n. J In. 3 (t b in. to less man d fl 6 In. i fl w leu than d ft 6 1n. ' In, dRbin. to less than!tt q,n. 5 (t to Ins than ! ft 6 m. i In A S ftbm. to less lhan6R li m. >iniM1 Rndwn Poom ~ ~MMMUnaM 'M]mml Ln~~ MnM IYnNnntlnwl / / / MMI / / / °ar ~' / ' / ~% a ~' r' FIVrt A~1.2m1 Spnekkr DerIV Asw far TyeleJ RnbIn1W Ocnpanty. performance. Th< testing was limited to one pendent•type residential sprinkler model. two reilioM sinrw rn ,,,~ .n aegr<esl. and two beam configurations on the single eodo• sure stze, In order to lodge the effMiveness of sprinkler in con lolling fires. two base line tnu, in which the ceiling was smooth and honzomal, wcre condoned with the pendent sprmki<rs installed antl with a total water supply of 16 {pm 19g Umml as required by NFPA Ilp. Th< rcsulu of the base line casts were compared with tnu in which the eeii ing was txamcd and/or sipped and two pendent sprinklers were insetted wnh the same water supply. Under the isms"ed conditions msud, the comparison indicate Ihas sloped and/or beamed ceitinp rcpreuM a snious challenge to the fire protection afforded by fxt rcaponu rcsideotial t~~n- klers. However, further tress with beamed eeiliop indidtcd that fire control equivakm ro that obained In the Wee line tests may be obuitRM If one sprinkler is centered in exh bav formed by the bums and a total water supply of 36 gpm (136 Uminl is available. Fire control equivalent to that obta:n<d In rho taulinr tests was obnined (m th! smxt;: sloped ceding tests when three sprinkler were innalkd wnh a tool water supply of Ss gpm ROB Uminl. In ^ singly smoldering•ssarted fire test, the fire was suppressed.' A+J.7.2 Anufrnrc solution may W used Pot maimain• ing awomauc spnnkl<r protection m small unheated areas. ' Egeeu of Cahedral and Beamed Cniin Construnion on Residemul Sprinkler Performance. FMRC J ~ MJN S,RA111. by Bdl !r R G ,Kung. V{', grown. W R.. and Nill. E., prepared (or L' S. Fue Admlmsinban IF<D. 19881. For 51 Cmta~ t m. • 2s / mm~J fl • aJ0/a m Cml rag I Not to Eaceed Maa~mum Cen my Ppmnmd gtt6-] 1 and Dosoucn°o a 2 ZI ~~ --~ ~ r %` Maumum Dnnnce plla<wr Above gauom or ~eemq OtlftruCt"On D"aten«F+om Nmr Siee Ol Caeng DEIIm[pon isgan a~.a.d lVelllee of dMnm. UlMlgkl w Pevarq W hH fonW Abort Renate d CNllag Oaaumske. Antifreeze solution arc recommended only for systems not exceeding d0 gallons (131 Ll. Because of she coat of refilling she system or replenishing small leaks. it n advisable to uu small dry valves where mom Shan a0 gallons (131 LI arc to be supplied. Propylcnc glycol or other suitable material may be uud as a substi[ute for priming water, tp prevent evaporation o(the priming Buid, and thus reduce itt formation within the system. A+7~JJ Beyond certain limiu. inerctued proportion of mtifreeze don not Isswer the freezing point of solution. ISer Figure A-4J. J.J.J.) Glyttrine, dimhyktu glycoh ethylene glyenl, and propylene g13'rol should never &uud wirhmst mixing wen water in proper proportions, because these materials tend to thicken neu J2'F (0'C}. A+J.JA To avoid leakage the materials and workman- shipshould be excellent, the threads clean and sharp, and the joins tight. Use only meWfxed valve. A+7J.3 Tnu shouldWmade bydnwinga sample ofthe solution from valve B two or three limn dosing the freezing castor. especially d it ha been necessary to dram she bwlding sprinkler system (or repair, change, etc. A small (hJyfd7ometer should W used so that a small sample writ be i sins [aw 13D-I g IVSTAIUTION Oi SfkINkLEF SYSTEMS IN OyE. AVp TM0.fAMILY DWELLINGS AND Mdll$ NAMES U 3 •~e O Ge ~!< VO ~~' r i a •n Ill d0 in I _gD -Tfi i0 -aa n m . n an cn en m a n m I m IgIvNW `1x [.eat Tout a. Water Preuurt m Strew _.__ .__ b. Arbnnnly Selen Pipe Sire LL c. Dedun Metx Lxs (-- SiuL._- -_ -_ d. Deaun NEW Lon for Elevmon c Sysmm Comml Valve' 1_h x b.qp _ e. Deduct Pnvurc Lou from City Main - tc SpnnYlx-,_~_,~ ~_ -Pipe- h - -valves- h _Eltrowr- n Tee- __..-h _ioW- h x ~ .._ , f. Deduct Pteuuu Lon for Pipit'-Control Valve to Farthest Sptiakla• percent nv Voroml ToW Fiaerc A-41.3..1.3 FrxEiq Polsn o! Watt/ Saansn of Equn. Elkykoe GlycolaW DlxhYlane Glyad. Slz< Quae. Dncriprion Felt 90' Elbow _ sulgcient. When water appears at valve B or when she test - a5' Elbw Ta , sample indicates that [he solusion has become weakerred, ._ LTnh Wve _ empty the rntire systeo and recharge q prcvitwsly do- Vdve(-I _. scribed. ToW Ft x _ ~ _ _. A-a-1.3 Determination of public water supply pressure ounr bable mini m rasure cnp- ld t ble i o a h ToW mv. ou cc s a nt ro mu P P Siu P:aa. Derrippio4 dition prcvading during such petitxb u as ni{bq or Burin{ __ 9g' Elbow --. summer months whrn hgvy usage may occur, also, the as' FJ0.sw _ possibility of interruption by goods, or i<e conditions in -Tee __ wmrec Chao YBve __ Vave(___) _ TOW Flx_. _,_ RerrW oiq PaNtlrt fa SpriaMkr Operadon 'rason MIe lYEln ad.)(aA NA IeL aaa Ids For st u.im I n . o.>aal m: I v. - o.oaEV w. F1gLn AM./1p CaMdwlw Seat. Ia1hNW tVa IM TaW Wxx Pmaule x Soppy arkt ,. Dedun Had lau fa Elmtion ~-~_ l--h x O.aNI b. DeduLS Pauura lar from Pipia{ WisMin ~._-~~ Buildiq' Ram.iruq Prtaure fa Spriaapr Dperatwa ~~ _~- •sscsan frm iaab w Lat. nq, (.), d;d; fbr H lieiu I M • O,sbll n 1 Pal ~ QofM Iar Fipn A1-0.3(2) Caksgatlaa Swt-[4ralaa ADM, {aeslrr Pay. RqP AaY 8qM/• Iwatr APpetl0ix B Referewd Pnblk.tbn B-1 The following docummu or portions thereof are referenced within this standard for inFcrmauonal purpous cnly and thus are not considered part o(Ihe requirements of this document. The edition indicated for each reference is the current edition as of the date of the NFPA iuuaace of this document. B-1,1 \FPA Poblintioro. National Fir< Pmfection Asso- aanon. Ba[terymarch Park. Quincy, MA 02269. Iso- NFPA 13.1989. Standard far the /nrrallanon of SpnrtWn Svnrmr NFPA 13gJ 967, Recommended Practice for the /nspm- rian, Tercing and ,Nornrenance of Sprinkler Swremr NFPA 13R•1989. Standard for thr fnttal/anon of Sprim klerSVrrems in Residential Occupancies up ro Fnur Srortes Irt Height NFPA 20.; 9g7, Standard for the /nsml/anon o(Cenrrtfo- gal Fire Pumps NFPA 7L 1989. Standard (or the lrtsm(lanan. Mainte- nance. and C'se olHaurehold Firr Warmag g?u;p....,a. leave o Ivey nralul rrt rme.wl Aaocnwn. au cram. roerRd The <otrvnpl m Inn Inaes Ir.rprnr vW alalMr item Ne copnraM In Inc aMInKM Mich n IrMCr. Tile Ilcemnq alwlmm M font fM h aaculeeM yr rwl appmolle to Inn InaeA Lnu IIWC. mq ml tr laPlaaacea In vnak M In pul b rnf mew mawu ale rapes .,nKn Felar~laa M rtr nM.ollll Frt Rwc[rlm Auo[uuon. IM A 1. Alas. wM<rrow. lJ, A3J lewellerlw.... Dcfimaon ..... ~ . ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ..L) ~ ~ ................IS Drip eM mrWboon Anrarteae Solunonr. LSA. hNS al a l ai U f.nemr A+1.IJ ~~' ,, a1.1 Definmm~ .... 41. ).I Salm..., .. ... .. ...... JJ.6 .~. M- Collaarbaw to maim .... ..a33. Fier. A-bl la Inm d Il l e ennmv ... .. ~ „IJ. A-La IAOaMY ............... ......... ~ 1R Unlit of 111lYYRlllnll ,p. Mantle lose ..... ...... DMSnme ..... ........... ......... ... •J ...... .. ..... .. ..........14 aeMp eW lowWab .... ... ..... ..... 63 M13 Drr¢m ena mormW .. ... . ...... .. .,,, LS.L A-1.1.1 d- fpnem ........ ..... ... ... Caep a. AJ , ..... .. H.A+1 aeelp r4cWp .. ... .. ..... Mr: Dlncaoge, dnlp afta4 ........ .......... ...... ......... . ld nnKIW. eererb. Canfyunaom .........,, ,., ...... a3 Defimuao. .,.. SSlttlarar, rtatipr .. ........ .. ........ L3 . al I MetmWena lAlnenflom.. Ave d , .. .. ..TWk Y1.1 a r l rxnmuon . .. ., .... ... L] a . Suppnru .. .. f, T! J .a __.~,i ~ .' ::. AJJ Drelm . ~.,. .. ... .... )•I ..... .......... Weer fappf, Rrenar0eal M . . ..... ........ .. ......... N ............. ~ ..... ad 3 ~ .. DeM1ne ITMleoe . .. ..., .,. ~..,., .HS ...... . . A+1.f~FK A+if . a~ lll .,... ... .....IJ .. A qnr~ e na Deamtmq.. .. ... .., .. ..L) ~ ...... DNbPl7au .............. ... ......... ....... ........ .......1.). A.1.) ..... I-) IlwUlq aeh ~~~ ~° .. ........ ....... .. Deanmpn... arealnr r fvppf a, oMnnw. ~~ .. ..... .. .. .... IJ a1Wn nnmp .. 1.51. 1.1.7. reEk YSf amrnnitios., ..... ., . ~.,,,., bl pl1m,.., ~9 7.J „It.f.~ UD-?O I~'ST~LNTI04 Oi SMIt1KlER pY$TEMS IN ONE. nND lYO.E,MILT W EWNGE A510 MOEIIE HOMFS •tpaa[aM. kaek N., .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... Ad 3, ~P T~Mea bbz la and pl w D fimnon, ..,. Id iw1y ... .... ... .. ..... .d.l.t. N.S. A-b3,La. larpoae of vandaN I3. A-Li A+i.1, A+1.6 V• 5• Hope of aOnEanl .. .. 1 ~1. 41d sOtSauar mama Camponmv .. .. .[hap.) Definwon. .. I-J SptlORlsn , ulOmall: Decmnon IJ Co~enE[ 0.L! Doipn ,ne :nsullatmn .,. Y1 Lxy:on of ... .0.6 \umEer of. 0.13.A+1.2 PanunE and omamtntal fimshn .. .. .Y1.6, A-yf.6 Pap:on of .. . 43. A+3 Rnldmual Lxfimpon. ., .. ... ... .Id Debnn:an, .. ... .IJ IIE~ Esn L'WnWwwvesnt. .. ... .... I-6 .Y. nks ... . .. . .... .... .. . ..... ... . .. }I CM[k DeSeiuod .. ... ... .. ... I-1 Caolld D[6nOlop . .. .. . . ...... ... .I J. 419 Supply, amnESmepl d .. . . 0.J~3. M0.l, S. Fi4 A+).5 q. OaaR Je~wA . .. ... .......... ... . .... ... .... ..... MJ AA ryMf .... .... ....... ....... ... ... .. ... .Chap.3 Gnetal pmawm ..... ....... ........ ....... _ .2.1 Mopk bme .... ... ... ... .. . . .. .. ... ... .... .. .2.A Spmrn .. ... .. .. .. ....... . .. . .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .3-2, A3•z waEMk~ ............ .... .. ... .. ........ .. ..... W.1 OeEanin .... .. .... . .. ... .. ... . . .. ..... ... .. .... .. .Id iE So e><~.61t ,~, 13R-I Copynrhe 0 1999 NFPA, All Riylu RsservM NFPA 11R Studa~d for the fnsull><tlod of 5priRlckr Systems iR ResideotiRY OccRprtttcies Rp to Fatr Storlp io Heyht 1989 Edltfoo This edition of NFPA 13R. Standard (or the lmrallanon of Sprinkler Syrumr in Reridrnria/ Occupanrier up ro Four Sraricr in Height, was prepared by the Tahnilal Committee oa .Automatic Spnnhlm, mleaud by the Corteiatiag Committee on Water E9tittduishio8 Systems, attd acted on by ma NatiotW Fite Protection Anocia[ioo, loc, at its Fall MeedoB 6eM Navemher 1417, 1988 in Nashville, Teonaue. It wa issued by the Sludards CauocB oo Jmuary 13, 1989, vrith u eBective dam of February 6, 1989. The 1989 edidoa of this standard hu been approved by the American Nuiooal SmodaNS tas[imm. Orlda and Dasrbpnt M NFPA 13R NFPA 13R reptetenu a tssilatone io the devebpmeat of spnutkr tnstdlatioo desi8o smndards. Thu hrn edinoo enoompanea a mmbiud e6on of the file protection community m develop a standard (or the proteltion of tow-riu, raiden[ia1 faatitla. Thu staddard u iataadtN m vide ^ hyper depee of life safety and property protection m the iohabitann a[ iow-rise. multifasoilY dweiliup. Fromulpted u ^ dacamrnt which provides for iocrased levee of protection to htuWiaa aCeuMnr. •n. document has alas ooesidr..d •a! -c-::M:;~.u v a spnaCkmd faclliry u compaRd ro u umpnttkkrtd facility. As the number of seta ud cities that implemu[ spritdtla ordillanssx continua m Brow, it is feh that syuems for certain mideotuU occullueia can be eyciutty and edemivcly ituWled in acoordaoce tsiN Wis studard. Thies dacuroeRt wiR provide rcgsilremean oo system desipt which rube from water supplies [o hardwart selsxtion to poeitlonia8 and lagtioo of automatle spridklen ti ~ -~r = A~r,NDf 2E~~yYEf~ = ad~v E o T o 1 vti v2 S~ ~,~T~~TIVE ~+»....~ 171_2 INSTAl1ATION M SFM1IN{ID, StTTFIn IN F610lNlLrL OCNMNCIO U! TO IWR SIMn] M IVJCHI CoetNme a• RWar FatlelRJfhia Sleh~e Ceneletlet Coomittee PeY D.l~tL Char,we Dree'Mbauk • Nwcnta loc. trM L 9elr~e. $IeTOry VnioeY Flrt PrvhNOO NpciNOo (Neeeplel) New C. vb. Rel/ Jaw l.Wedam lee Ttoo J Meee Jr. paorY Mutwl pmrtt Cory. cW W J. Dryer J.. MJ N haaniw coeWUOo tleRed 1Lre.ea Mi,f xu6ae Awomeric Jpne• tler Cory. tr1oJ IL Siva Maxemre. NJ Jerre w. Nrlre. lrma w. NoW Co. c>.~ w. Jcbw, Sebmo Eepeerria cory. Techplol Cumnittee ae ARWmltlc Sprltklen Clnrn w. Stttoo. [IWnw 9ettoo EeywfeeCap !~~ L iirerw, Jreneen RY ~ (Aleaeerr o N. WlatYl) FAeoi C. Moe, DeRC d puttic SeNJ/ Mp. FMANA Cteb L Mer0. AunmMe SprieYle Coµ d AmerfO Rep. NFSA •Itwr M. Ceni/, Jr. Oner Coe teeCrrll wv. Au Tt..er c. wl, xum. Neret corv. Rep. uau JYe L Drtre, Uetn CutiM Cap. ReD. NFM IF70 U J. DreelY. Vedenmove LAtorereeirr is Jeer L DeeRrC, NW. Aa dile~ Millrn (Von LieeuE w I1D w I ]tl tetras L. DYp in CoeeW lee felon J. dq, Fin See, lee. Rep. AfSA w. DerM xI1M Cott Camry Fin DFe t•p uFc tkter+L HqM/,110 Cannnefll tot linker RW N. hw, teH)se! Arrerieur iee treen! w. iJeb.lellerulel tut lererue r, 1. L.etrp GrieW LMlrereuee S>ws co, tiA Rep. CAU me eewe we)ee M. Mrb, ler M~In CIrF Fin Dew Jr1e 0. OTIreL DrRtrte<r!l,lnedwr be J. L tldo/oi NrL twrnA Caoeil dCeRW L J. >f Alien. l~srR It W rll Co. J.ltf trn. V! Fin A4~ nun lenllrt re uo w 1111 Mi L SJq!- Ar1etR .1pve Sp1Yb, tee. ~~ wr LArAatleeaM ha. Syrrrr Ca lee. I1µ NF3R Jeb J. MW UeinO Awa d lauerJmo ! M prwris der FhoMeS! MFe FirrfeJ W. d eM UJ • CrrY R'io G ttlK Cwe fae M twrW pi L wt~. Feelrn MReeY tanrd Cap NeJe/ L MYdrll.IJRrrellMeRrl Wweele la tµ. Ml L J. aryl UeArre+inn IYawalndoveM D. N. Yob, Iq •eebr be. tq. NFM IRS Ian 161br~. AJrptie AleaoeJc SFrit kb Co Rµ, NM i' sa- Repr 4.alYnl Fanory NmuL neuncn Carp. Nhamne a w. E. W~koq Dw R Dar Dnr Chomwal Co. IAlumau m 1, L PoROOI Ta~q L EylveL IndurtrW 0.1ft Imm~n I Apemne ro K. W Lnderl OvrY D. Erna. Crnrtt for Fin Revamp I Ah<mne low D, Walmel Ruwli p. Fksiy, NN. Fin Sprtnkln Aun. Hllempe 1o W. Tnul Gett[a L lararlcL Uodervnun Lahonronu Inc. IAllemav w L. J. DaWlol EdrW R Wiq. U'ndmmtm labonlonn of Canada IAlmm~e ro R.1 WnEhD Curvll V. Inraae %ema Cory. IAh<mne m D. M. Yadul RpeaN D..Nalhe, Amen«n Flrc Spnnkltt Aowc. IAlnmau Ip R.1 GraYl J. P. NwWey, Natl. nmren Council IAlumm to l K RlcnaNaonl Nerw M. MuwaL MurHl • L<Bmon AmMlacn f Allttn.u io 1. G. O'NNII FrueH J, Mlklaaier Enmuv Kodak Co. 1 Vtmm~ w E. /. 5 tiEhwarl Jwaaa O. NanL 5. Paaadeea Flrc Dupl. IAlmm~e to E. C. Ba:oel C.aavY w, O'Reerka Smulper Enpoeann6 Cory, IAirnnan ro C. W. SchirmeYl Jw RqN( Tnc viklnl Cory. IAhomaw m [. RamnD NartY Skw, lou. Ana. of Fin Chub (Aiwmau lo'W. Dao10 Hnnel Jaok Tlaeln, Nlu AmowDe Spnnkler Ca. IMmmau to L. Zimnnrmannl Job wak.r~r. The SMnwe Cory. IAhcmau ro T O. DYY) Job F. VIoN, HF15pnbkr. Inc. IAIllrmn In W. Yemphp) WIRY A. WaN Rolf Jrnvn k Avomaua 1«. IAlltmale le R. H. lrnwl NwnMeF EIM L pWatt Nupn Aaaa. WIIY [. [v144 Ko[N Anat. Rep. Comm«« oe Sahly m LiD [arrY M. Laa. W«maM Firt SYnelm Sabcaa~lEW M Aeefafeedd Oocv/aPCM[ Jab G. O'INNL C'AmmwA of-aaasw AV«ub ix. Edwvd L pa4kl HWhn AUaa. 14aad L CaeyM0. Rtliae4 Aulema4e SpnekM fo. I«. Jaelaa l Dwrna[, NW. Avo. of Honx [Ylidue Rklwe L Nllpgr ISO CemmamJ Rink Smicrn RalFll Jecbae. NHUV i«waan Co. Naly{LaF [~ Fknory Mateal Raasnn Corp. Gvarpa L Iwa1Ur UsMnnmv Eahmurw IK. RaMa L Sayre, NFM SY! Liaiw Dada LaaaWY. Merylaed Fin Fgwpmeva Cocpo- nlloe J. L RM~w. Fin Raenpcn Cauonl of CaoWa N~aT Sbe, Ivtl. Aaae. d Fin C'hieD 1. T~ RWA US Rn Adeunimetiw WRY L lkM+, GrivaeD Fin prontlieo SYalema Co. Ir. Wlrw Tkara. Kespr Omep Nld~ A. WYM Rolf New aaG Aava. lac. Thn /w rrpnwu rM meuderrhap d rM uan rM Cgmm~m ru M4oaN w IM rw oJ1AU eewa .e.n rry nnv cAawpae rv tM numGr. pTri m.Y Aa.d n..v.ud. NOT[: MsmMMip w + fomnuma IRaR voa is aea of IOHf wewna u eadoaraaaM a1 r0e Aaa«mroe «avT davman de.ebgd n/ IM Comm~ns oe .11ioh the nnmMe rr.s V ~ qx Eaem t7R-< nsusswnoHOr nautassa ssmse a atsmorttu ottvnsxcw ur io rava sroiucs w uewxr CaHOh PrNan ......................................... ..... ........1}Ii_ S Cdaptnl G~ua~l lafarmtlw ....................... ........ .....17R- 5 I•I Scope .... ......... ............... ... ...... ... ..... ... ..13R- 5 I.1 Puryou ........ ... ............ ...... ...... ........ . ....IIR- 5 1.7 Defiainam ...................... ............ ........ ... ..UR- S La Uaits .............................. .. ....... ........ .....13R- 6 1.5 Pipio6 ........................ ............. ..... ... .....UR- 6 I-6 System Trya ..................... . .................. . . ...13A- 7 CdyW 3 Woskltq Plm, OpIP. lMPlhtloo. Ampuew Tan, ~oJ .Linntuns ................................. .....13R- 7 :-I WorkiL6 Plasu and Acttpunce Tau ....................... .....13R- 7 2Q Daigp and InsW4tim ................................. .....17R- 9 2-3 Water Supply ........................................ .....13R- 9 2-a Svstem Componmu ... ..................... ........... .....t3R-IO 2-5 System Dai ............. . ......................... .....13R-I1 2-6 Location o(Sprinklm ........................... . ..... .... .13R-I 1 2.7 Nainteoance ....................... .......... .. ..... . ....13R-I1 ChP1ur 3 Rafiteras`d ANlostlou .................. .............. .13R-12 Appall; A .......................... ..... ..... ... .. ....... .. .13t-12 APPnlI>< R Rafannnd P~6lkaslon ................. ...............13R-17 /tsMx ......................................... ... ......... ...i3R-IB trN awsn ~ ~~ GENEML PI1nVn10FS IJR-S NFPA 13R Standard for the SnstallaHon of Sprinkler Systems iR Residenfial Occupapcies up to Four Stories iR Height 1989 EdiNoo NOTICE: Av unnsk l•Ifollowmathevumberorle[mrdniavat- mg a puagnpb mdmam expbmrory matenal on thin para{raph m APRndtx A. Infurmauov oe re(ertviced publioaovs Lan be fauvd iv Chapter i ana Appeodu h. Prc(ace (t is intended that this snodud provide a me[hod for those mdmduals wuhigg to install a sprinkler rystem for life safety and property protection. It is qot the purpose of this standard to requirt the insWlatioa of w amomatsc sprinkler syncm. This standud assumes [ha[ one or more smoke detetton will be igsnlied in attrordan« with NFPA 76, Standard for the Intfa((azson, .Nairtrenann, artd Use of Household fire Warning Equipmenr. Chapter) General laforaudoa 1.1• Scope. This standard deals with the design and in• stallanon of automatic sprinkler systems for protection against fire Inzards io midemial ampaacies up to fow canes m Hinge[. IQ' purpose. The purpou of this snodard is to provtde deugn and innaliation regmremenu for a sprinkler system m aid m the detection and control of fire in rnidentlal occupancin sari thw provide improved protettion agaipst mJUrY, life fins, and property damage. A sprinkler system d<sigaed and nsUlled in aaordao« with cis suadud is expected so prevent Buhover (uW ipvolvemenp in the room of fire o igia, when spri[d[lered, and to improve the chance for ace spoors to esape or be evacuated. Nothing in this mndard is intended to rcatrin new technologies or altercate arrapgemenu, providing that the I<vcl of safety {tdcrihed by the standard is not lowered. 1-3 f><flaltkses. ADprovM. A~apnble to the "authority having junsdic NOTE: Th<Nabonal Firc Rottcliee As[ouiatiaa don rim approve, inspect or Bendy any imWlatiom, prpcMurn, egmpmevt, or sn[enW mr don it approve m cnlwu [Hung kbontonex In duermiaiq{ the aawpnbtlitY of imrWatwm or prsrsdum, equipment m matenW, the authonlY Mnei Junrdictioe may hue aaeganae oo mro- plunce with NFaA or roper appropnau spgdude. Ie the absence of such rtandardL rod aunonry may regmrt evD donee of groper n aW kuvn. procedure or nee. The authority bane{ Junsdigibs may also refer to We hemp or kbebn~ penmen e(an orpniradoq covamed wW produq evalw- uom whsch u iv • pmiuvv m dnermsne mmpliavice wsW appmpnate srwdardf (or W< egrRU1 pmds[edov v( psted lcros. AgtyoNry Ha.lp{ Jariadistiw. The "auWonty having jurisdiaioa" is the osgusimiov. om« or mdindual r<• sponsible for "approving' equipment, ap instalntion or a procedure. NOTE: The phrase "authority havinyunsdiasov^ nosed iv :VEDA dowaevn iq a broad manner nom Junstlitttnn sari "approval" a{evmn vary u do War mpovubawn. tVhert publm Wny a pnmary, the "wmonry hapoa iuns• dittiov ' mry be • federal, sLm. IoW or oW<r regional depanmev[ ar ivdrvsdual such u a firt chief. fire marshal, chef cf a drt prevention burnu, labor depanmeot, health depanmevt, husldiq{ odmal, elecviW inspettor. ar amen having stltmory aumanry. Foe imuno« puryosm, av rotor avice impenson departmevt, raiva bureau, or other ivsur- ava company reptesenuuve may be We "auNOnty bane{ )unsdimtov." Iv many cimumsnnm We DropenY owver ar hn Qesipsated a{m[ asinine m< ink of We "aumonry hmv{ iuNsdiNOV"; at {overnment iuuW[ivga. We com- mwdiv{ oPo«r or depanmevW omyal mry be rye "auWor- rty havin{JUnLdiaian:' Cheri[ VaM. A valve that allows Bow ip oq< direction only. Castro) Yala. Ap indicting valve employed to «ptroi (shut) a supply of water to ^ sprinkler system. Duip Dlaharge, Rate of wrier diuharged by an auto- matic sprinkle, expressed io yllam per mipute. Ur7 3ye4~. A system employigg wtomatic sprigklen than arc attached to a piping system conWniog air under atmospheric or higher DrH{ntes. Iris of pressure from the opeom{ of a spnpkler or dtdection of a 6rc woditiop causes the rtlrxu of weer into the piping system and out the opened sprinkler. ITrelliq Udt. Ooe or man room[ arranged for the use of one or more iodividuW living together a io a single hot[sekeepiag unit, normally having cooking, living, saoi• tary, apd slmpip{ facilities. tasNkL Fquipmmt or material to which has been attached a label, symbol or other identifying mark of an organization ac«pubk to the "auWority having juriadic- tiop" and copcerped with product cvalwtiop, that main- uios periodic impectiop of prodtctiop of labeled equip- ment or rpauriW and by whoa htbWo{ the manufacturer ipdiuta compliapce wtt6 appropriau supduds or perfor• man« io ^ specibed mapper. IJatN. Equipment or maltriW included in ^ list pub fished by ao orpniratiop aLtxpubk m ue ''authority having jurisdistioe" and mncraed with product evalw• tiop, that rtsaintaim periodic inspeetiop of production of listed equipment or makrials apd whose limieg turn either that the equipmeet or material meets appropriak standards or hu beep rated and foupd wiubk for use ip a specified manner. NOTE: Thr mein for idmtiryin{ listed ryuipment may vary fm each oraaniauon con«mM wnh Drodum evalua- S$ .wsew,m 178-6 1`rSraLUl10N OF tPRIY1(LER SVfrEW IN RWDGYTIAL CIGIIMNCIES VR N fW.'R StOIUn IN MEILM lion, same of which dD not reL'o~ue ryuipmat u listed ualeu it is aba labeled. The'luthanry havsvglunsdipiov" sboWd uhliu the ryncm employed by the listia{ otymm- uoe to ,devnly a lined produsa. Sfultipvrpme Plplvg Sysnma. Piping sYStema within rendecual oces.paneses intended ro serve both domestic and fire protection needs. Resldrvdd Occupavcin, Residential mcupancin tt tv- cluded Ir [he scope of this standard Include the following, as defined :v VFPA fora, Gfe Safety' CodA: (U Apanmevt buildings. (2? I.adpeg oast t7oelaihwsr (iy Board and use facititia Idow evacwtloa type witb 15 or ter oavpenn and p:umpt evacwum type). ,(y Hoala, monlf, sad dorminrin. Rasidentlal Sprinkler. An automatic sprinkler that hu been speci5<dly listed for use in midmtial occupancin. Shag. Indicates a mwdatory requiremm[. Shodd. fndiutd a «commendatiov or tha[ which is advlxd but not required. SpdakMr-ARWmatk. Afire suppreuion deviu that oprnta automadully whm iu hat•smuated element is hated to or above its thermal nting, dbwin{ wattt ro discharye over a spttdfic arcs Sprinkles Sysem. An ivtegnted system of pipin{ mn- netted to a water supply, with listed sprinklm tMl will aumma[iuliy iaitiam water ditchu{e over a fire ara. When required. [be sprinkler system also indudtt a coerrol valve and a device for actwtivg w a4rm whm the system ooentra Stendard, A document connieiv{Duly maadamry p tr visions using the ward "shill" to iadiute requiremeou. Explaaa[ory mannd may be included oNy is Ne farm of "fine pnvt" poles, in (oomota, of iv av appmdu. W~tar0ow Alarm. A sounding devitt activated by a wateAow detector or alarm check vdve. WmerBow Detector. An electric siapalsv{ iadiutor or alarm check valve amusted by watt dow is om directior. only. wet Syatsm. A system empbyie{ wtomatle spridtlen that are amched to a piping rynem Lrontaidn{ wattt nail connected to a water supply, so that wattt dixhasla Immediately from spneklen opened by a fire. TaIY 14 ~aaw d Uelt L'W Sfmkel Coatsnbs Famor li[er L I W ~ J.'1f3 L pasta P. I P+i - 6891.757 h 'ov bu 1 psi ~ 0.0689 tar bu bar 1 by ~ 105 Pa Fm aaYUOVY mvretvova and ,dasmauov IM ASTN Efa0, SmwdvM/o. .Nana Prasrur. surcd is to be regarded of the rcquircmen[. A given equiva- lent value may h approximate. 1.13 The convmion prottdurz fm the SI uniu has been to mWtiply the quantity by the convenion factor wd then round the mWt to the appropriate number of sigpificav[ digits. 1-s PIMw 1-l.1 Pipe or tube used in spriakltt systems sball be of dle vuteriW is Table 13.1 or in aaordaaa with t-5.2 through 1.33. Tha chemical Dropenies, pbYricsl properties, and dimeadom of the tnateriaL listed is Tsble 1-3.1 shell be at leant equivalent m the standards cited iv the table and dared ro withstand a working pleasure of not less thw I73 psi (12.1 ban). taW 4l.1 MrrrlaY W DlrRarlsaa SnMasd SpaiMtloa fm Elrk sad xa-apped zian CaatM tOdvsdud)ltelded and SrmMr Sad Pep ten Fin Pttttlslvioa Ur ASTM A797 Spaxidrnim ten Wtldq sad 9rmler ....: %~y. ASTM A37 wrou{ht3ud Pip ANSI 336.IOM SpeLidutiaa fm FSstttiuRtairtavw WsWd Sad Pips ASTM AI7! Colger'Nbe (Drum. 9astdarl Slkdludoe fm Srm4r CoPPrt Subs ASTM has Speddadoo fm Geaml RNWtemau fm Wmyel 3estvhr Copper sad Copper Alby Tub ASTM 8231 ludo{ F!M Meal (CLadMatgo BCIJ-7 m /CuPJ) AWS AS.a Specilatbe fm Sown Me W, 93.3 ITiodativrey.Otsh 93TA1 ASTM l12 1d.2 Other typo of Pipe or tube may be used, bus only nose Wtee far thin xrvt5x, 14 L'RIa. Metric uaiu of meuuremeet in this stmdard arc in accordanu with the moderoized metric system known as the Innrvatioval System of Uoiu (!q. iWO unin (lime and baq, outride of bus reeogvizM by S6 arc wm- monly used in interoatiapal fire protection. Theo units arc listed, with cmvenion faL'mn. in 7abh 14, 14.1 If a value for meuur<ment as given in this standard u followed by an equivalent value m other amts, she fine 1•!.g Whenever We word Pipe if hard in this standard. it shall be uadcruood m also man tube. 1-!A Pipejoiard with mrchanial poovrd Rttidp shall lfe joined by a lutad mmbiwUOO of httiap, yskets, and groom. When grWVa arc mt m rolled m the Pipe Ney shall be dimetlsiotldly compaubb wish the Mtistµ £anprion: Steel ppe with wall rhfrknrsm lea than Srhrd- u/r JO/In riser b in. (10J mmJ and larger/ or Srhedufr 10/in ,sr easm ~ ~~ wovamn toys. owcrv, Irvrswnorv, atterrancz Tres Arvv ataturIIaArvcE 13R 7 size lest than 8 in. /103 mmlJ rhdf nor be famed by funngr w,M wuh prpt hovirtB avr grooves. 1.3.3 Fittivp used iv spnvkler systems shill be of the materials iisted is Table 1.5.5 or iv accordance with 1-5.7. The chemical propertin, physicil propertim, aed dimev- smcs of she marndils iisted iv Table 1-5.5 shall be at lent equivalent m the standards cited iv the nble. Fittivp uud iv sprinkler systems shall be designed to withstand the working pressures invalvtd, but not Im than 175 psi (13.1 bars) told water pressure. fxceyrion~ Lrsrrdrranddrd efrf+prudent dry upright or d.v srdewdf rprinklers maY br attended mra unhmrcd Wrens War inreMrd/nr living purpotn. Id.2.1 Antifreeze solution shall be iosWied in accor- dance with 5-5.3 of NFPA 13, SrarWord for the /nsraUcaort of SpnnWp Sys(erns. Chapter 2 Workla{ Plan, Desip, IosnWdaa, Atapraaa Tags, W Mdabeoaca T~bk 1-33 Mpesiila sad Dimembp $taNeA Cut Irvv Cav Irvv 1Lreaded Fltvnp. Class 125 aed 250 . ............... . ANSI BI6,4 Cast Irve Pipe Flaoda and Flavaed Fimop ........... .............. . ANSI B 16.1 MJleabk Iron Mallmbk Iran Throded Fi¢ivgs. Class 150 and 700 ........... . ....... . ANSI 916,7 Steel Fattory-made Thrmded Finiep Class 130 and 706 .................... . ANSI BI6.0 Buttweldiv{ Evds for Pipe. Valves, Flavgn, ad Finiep ........... ....... . ANSI BI6.23 Spec. f ~t % a ibov S H avd AIIOY $leN for Modentc and Elevated ?:mpcntum .... ............. . ASTM A334 Pipe FUv{m +od Flanged Fininµ Steel Niekel Alloy and Other Spaiil Albya . . ANSI BIa.3 FordM Steel Fituep. GrM w.u.a ova I meadcd .......... . . ......... . ANSI B 16.1 l Capper Wrought Copper and Copper Allay Soiderfamt Pressure Fittiap ............ . ANSI 816.32 Cnt Cooper Alloy Solder-0oiot Prcuurc Fittivp .... . ................ . ANSI BI6.11 1.5.5 Jaivu for she woaectioo of copper mbe shall be brazed. Ezcrpnort.~ Sofskre///oiw /pJ•J sddn need) maybe wed far we-pipe roppn tulle rytrernr. 45.7 Other typo of fittiap mry be wed, but only those listed for this service. !-6 System 74pes. 1.6.1 Wtt-Plp Sptaaa. A wet-ptpe system slWl be uteri when all piping h instilled is areas vol mbjM to freezing. 1.63 Provision shall be made to protect piping from freezing iv unheated ana by use of one of the following acceptibk methods: p) Antifrau system. (b) Dry-pipe system. 2-i Working Plw and Aueptaocs Team. 2-i.l W'orklag Plana, 2-1.1.1 Working plan shag b< submitted for approval so the authority having )udsdittion before any equipment n installed or rcmodded. Deviations from approved plans will require permission of We sonority havmgjurisdictioa. 2.1.1.2 Workistg picas shall bednwvromiadiated scale, av sheets of uniform siu, with s plan of euh Boor, made so that they can De tally dupliated. sad shall snow the folivwiv{ data: (a) Name of owner sad occupant. (b) Loatioo, includip{ meet addrea• (c) Point of compau. (d) CeiBnj cotutructioa. (e) FWI height cross stxzion. (F) Lvatioa of 8u walk, (g) Loatioo of partition, (h) Occugary of tech era or room. (i) IAxatioa aM size of cOttnal..l .,...~._, _:..~, , null iauttrooms. Q) Avy small ecdrnura iv which oo spriaklen xrc to be inahlied. (k) Siu of city main iv setae, presort cad whether deadead or circWating Wad, if dead<ad, direction and diStaaCe m pquat circuktio{ male, elty main Ilsl resulfa iacludiag ekvanoa of tat hydra[. (I) Make, maoufsetumr, type, hat-mpotsu elemrnt, tempeawm ndog, sad rtominil orifice sin of spriakkr. (m) Ttmpetatun nting sad ksatioo of high-tempeature rpriakkn. (o) Number o(spriokim oa ach riot, per Boor. (o) kind and locaioo of aWID Delb. (P) type of pipe agd fittiop. (q) Type of protcctioo for aoompWlit pipe. (s) Noasiaa: pipe rim wnm leogtha shown to sale. NOTE: When typicil hnaeh Bop Dtevail. is will be eeser- rary nrim oYy oat Br. (s) I.autioo add sin of riser pipplp. (t) type offittiap andjoipu sad laatioa ofali weldsand xnda. (u) Types and laation of haogen, slmva, beam. and rdttBoM of saucing tprinkkn, when applicable. `7 ~ nw eaaee 13R-8 ~.s~Awnan of sracvatsa srstew w wmctmss omrancw us ro sous stoup w unctrr (v) All control valve, check valve, drain pips, wd tert mnnecdow (w) Underground pipe size, length, loption, weight, mr [erial, point of coonemion to city main; the type of valve, metes. and valve pill: and the depth at which We top of the pipe is lard below grade. (a? For hydraulically deigned systems, the material to be included on the hydraulic data nameplate. ly) Vame and address of rontragcr. 2-1.2 APprovsl of Sprinkler Sysnme. 2.1.2.1 the installer shall perform all required acc<ptantt tests Isee i-i.J6 compi<[< the Contracmrs Material and Test Cer[ifi<atNs? (sec Figun 1-11.1), and forward the certificatt(s) to the authority hiving jurisdimion, prior to asking for approval of the instillation. 3-1.23 When We wthoriry having 'urisdiction deice to be presrnt during We condoning of! acceptince tats, the instiller shall give advwa notification of the nine and dale ~..We mNna will be performed. ''~..~~' ~~ mMaw Tan. / - 3.1 d L'nMrpwM Coa~sctlon. 3-la.l.l UnderFound mains wd IM-in mmectiow to syucm risers shall he flushed Eeforc connemioo is made to sprinkler piping, in order to remove foreign materials War mry have eoterttd We underground piping during the coupe of We instillation, For all systems, We fiwhing opera[ion shall be mntioued until water is clear. 3•I.J.13 Underround mains and Ind•in connections shall be flushed at We hydraulically calcu4tM water de- mand nm of We system. ~ttwaowousrosaaq .r m. +.vsua ~ su.~ w ~ "' w ~..~ ~ w , :rim i sews m.irw .:w°ia i4iw r',yar vnw°vr aws.na a I ~ I~~~ 'rYrr,Y'M I,~RgA M, OlilPaYeea „~ w,rwuu u,rs Flgrs L1.3.1 CawasMs :NMrrW aN Trot Cettllsws fx AMw~wN Wglag. -~ i s8 ntoeaoi;ns nssrncatsao WOaa1NGrUtlS. nESIGY.IVSTALNrmN. nCRRABCE TFS[S. WD MMYrENANCE UR-9 5-1.3.1.3 To avoid propem damage. provision shall be 2.2.1.2 Only listed or approved device and maurials as made for the disposal of waier iuuing from test outlets. indicated in this standard shall be used in sprinkler systems. 2.43.2• All systems shall be rased for leakage as 50 poi 13A hard above maasmum system design pressure. Ecrepuon, tt'hen: fug department conneanon o provided, Isvdrosranr pressure rzsss shall be pronded in acrordance wuh SfP.i l3. Standard (or the lnsra!larion of Sprinkler 5,~ stems 2-2 Design and lns[diatioo. 2.2.1 Devices and 32aterials. 2-1.1.1' Uniy new sprinkkr s`:L' F.c cmpbyed in !hs mstallabon of ipnnkler systems. 2-2.1.3 Sprinkler systems shall be designed fora maxi- mum working Preuure of l75 psi (12.1 6anl. Exnption: .Yigher desgn pressures mny br used n~hen a!l svsrem components are rased for pressures higher shoo 175 pv (12.1 hart/. 2-} WLSn SinpplY. 2-3.1 General Proviakoa. Every automatic sprinkler sys- tem shall have at least one automatic water supply. When srored water is used az the sole source of supply, the minimum ouannsv shall equal the water demand rate nmes 30 minmei. (See 2.5.13.) ~. xae>fa ..... >a>:a~as ~ m w ~ .ma I ... ws~ _ w ' e w on.n w.s w...ewausu.•mmr _ a.~..e.~uura.. nrm our rv..w~awnsesw. ern gM~M1YrM~ WA.Y~.YMer olOia0avrM•TU6Mar~~nrtrMP r~~.euer f Y VJOaY WTL,~T VOyALL.awx w.r~Tr rrrlmwr[~u. ry VF~Y JJ I Tm ~d1~•~aM aN a.o plyr w.yppl~YyrO W~ w• paY~wo~rr~i au~0 •.y ' ~~ W1~wM~YN wePanrOilY~'~I~Y~}ILM~p\~J ph.!(u~!r~~ ]•n ]W ~i~I,Jn~~.~p~lp.uo.~r9ai~ti- ~ri~•r1un0 _ w~.nreP wNA qrV ~rrV ..W~rn .wiiw Nrr 9.I.W ~~ nn u.r.arts....mnss+wwraa ' - aT "n~.Jl~ ~~ e.en... o..a...oae Figan 2.1.2.1 ICwdawdl CwvansrY AlasarW nN liu Carllder gse MawOar/ Mgln{. ~- 59 n„e,~ t31f-10 I\SALLV ION Or SPgISRLER SYSfEMr iN RnlnEMpL Cf<GANCIES L'P in FW R 4T0R1E51V HEIGMi 3-33' W~Ier SoDply Source. The following water supply source are acccptaDl<; la) A connection to a reliable water works system with or without a twomer pump. as required. (bl 4n elesatnd tank. Icl A pressure lank Installetl in accordance with S'FPA 13. Srondard 'nr the lnxallauort of Sprrnkler S,rstemr, and `'FP.4 _i 2. Standard for nhrer Turtkr for Pnvare fire Prorec- (IJn. Ids Astored water source with an automatically operated pump.:nstalled m accordance with `1FPA 20. Standard far the /nsrui(arNn n)'Certvdugal Fve Pumpt. L3.3 Siuitipurpose Ylping System. 24.3.1' A common supply main m the budding, serving both spit nklers and domes[ic uses. shall be accepnble when the domesuc design demand Is added m the sprinkler system demand. Esrepuon Damesnc Jevgn demand need ear be added If prmuron Is made :c prerenf liuw' an the domesrte water s,vsrem upon aprranon o/'apnrtklert. 2-3J.2 Sprinkler systems with nonfire protemion connec• turns shall comply with Settion 5-6 of ~FPA 13. Srondard for the Insm!lanon olSprmkler Svsrems. 20 System Campon<nn. 20.1 silve and Dnip. 31,1.1 When a common supply main is used fo supply both domesuc and spnnkler stems, a single listed Control valve shall be provided to shut ofl'both the domptic and spnnkler systems. and a separate s; utog valve shall be provided for the domestm system only. (See Figure d.7.1 'lar.J Emepunn The spnnkler nsrem prprng may haven sepa- - ....., ......~„ ,per wsru oy site o/ rhr following merhodn 'a, Certno! srauort. propnemry. nr remote station alarm servrre. rb, Local alarm servrre rhar zees( cause the sound(ng of an audible srgnal of a consranrly a(rended point. or h, Lockmq the valuer op¢n 20.1.2 Each spnnkler system (hall haves I•in. 123.4•mm) or larger dram and test covnemion with valve op the fystem side o(lhe control valve. 20,1.3 Additional Ih-in. (I l•mm) drip shall he instilled for each napped portion of a dry system that is subjM to fr~geratures. 303 At least one I'h in. (3B coins or 21h in. f64 mm) f`_.r.~ - departmcn! ro.^..^,r.;;an shLi be provided wnm the spun• kler system hu 20 sprinkler or more. 2.1.3 fRosstua Gages. Prpsure gage shall be provided to indicate prpwre on the supply and system sidp of main chick valvef and dry-plp< valve, and to indicate pressure on water supply presure tan W. 20.4 Plplnt Support. Piping hanging and bracing meth- ods shall comply with uFPA 13. Srondard/or the /pralla- oon a/Spank/er Svrrems. ' 'l-a3 Sprivkkn. 30.5.1 Listed reidential spriaklM shall h used inside dwelling units. The basis of such a listing shall consist of tests to establim the ability of the sprinklers to cvatrvl residential fires under standardized fire test covditioas. The s[andardixed room fires shall be bautl on a midmtial array of fumishings and fiaishe. - Escepuon .vo /r Retidenrral spnnklers shall not be used m dry {rsrems unlets specrfrca(1y listed far rhar ptopax. E.rcep0on .Vp.: Ocher types o/ sicced sprinklerr may he msra!!ed rn accordance with their listing rn dwelling units meeunq the deftninon of a romparrmrm /p defined m ?-5.12.1) nrnwded tie sate :knit four ,prinkiert are lacared in rht dwelling unit and ar (east one smoke detector rt provided in each creeping room. 2.4.53 Ordinarv temperawre rated spdnkl<n (135 to 170'F (S7 Io 7TC)J shall M installed where maximum ambient ceding t<mperaturcs do not exceed IlyO'F Ue-Ch 2033 Intermediarc temperaturt ntcd reidential spdn- klen (173 to 223'F (79 to 10TC)J shall be installed where maximum ambimt ttiling tempenturn are between 101 and 130'F (38 and 66'C). 20.5,1 The followin6 Dncticm shall be observed when instilling tpidential sprinkler, unless maximum expected ambimt tempenmrp art otbmwise dpermincd. (a) Sprinklm under glaze or Dlut(c skylights exposed m dirlxt nys of the sun shall be of intermediate tempenwrc clwifiatiov. (b) Sprioklen lean unventilated consxalcd spxe under an unipuWted roof, or iv an unventilated attic, shall be of inttnmMiam tempcnturc classification 2.433 When midenriat .adekb.. - ;~~ -,,. yiu a mmpmtment, u defined in 3-3.1.2.2, all sptinklm shall be from the same manufadurm and have the same heaa rnponu element, iacludin6 kmpmmre sting. Exception: Diffennr /empemrun wrings are permlued when rrquind by 1-s.3.1. 103.6 Standard sprinkles shall be used in areas outride the dwelling unit. Exnpnon No 1: Re(drnria! sprinkler may fie aced In odjotning romdarr or lobbin withJiat, rmaoth rdlingsand a herghr nor esceeding 10/1 (J.0 ml. Exception No. 2.' Quirk-nrpope sprinWers may b<sued in accordance wuh 2.5,1, Exttprion Na. 1. 503.7 Opermed or damaged rptipklen shall be rrpticed with spnnklcn having the same performagse chtutmteristia u original cG~pmmt. 203,1 When eoamttillic atiling plate (petttcheom) art used, they stroll tx listed. EsLVtcheon ptitp tired to ctpu a recessed or dusb-type spristkler shall be put of a listed sprinkler auembly. 2-13,9 Palsdy aN OnaraW Fltbkw- 2.1.3.9.1 Sprinkler (nine wry be hoary psih[ed or onamelrxf u ornamental finirh in accordance with 2-4.3.9.2: otherwise, sprinkler shall ear be painted sad any sprinkles sow saw - ~ ~© 'wonxme runs. orswrv ivsrecwwrv wcrrrnvice rrsrs, n.voxsumrvxncr I3R-11 shat have Seen painted, except thou with farorv applied coatings, shall be «placed with new listed sprinklers. 27.5.9.2' Omamen[ai finishes shall not be applied to sprinklers by amore usher than the sp_nnkler manufactures and only sprinklers listed with such shes shall bt used. r-J.6 Alerms. Weal water0ow alarms shall be provided ^~on all sprinkler sy s[ems and shall be connected to t~ -~ bwidmg Lire alarm system. when provided. _ 2.5 System Design. s.-5.1 Design Criteria-Inside Dwelling Cnit. '-5.1.1 Design Discharge. The s7s[em shall provide a discharge of not less than 1 B gpm 168 L mini to any single operating spnnklrr and nos less than 13 gpm 149 Umin I per sprinkler to the number nl design sprinklers. but not less than the h9mg of the spnnklen sl. E.rrmren Desgn discharge for sprinklers msralied :n an ;nrdunre nirh Eree•ptmrt 50. J o/1•J 5 /shall be m acco.- danoe »uh >prirtklrr Lsung ouerm. 2-5.1.2' Vumber of Desigp Sprinkkn. 2.5,1.2.1 The number efdrngn sprinklers shall include all sprinklers wnhm a compartment tc a maximum of (our spnnklen. 2.5.1.2.2 The definition of companmens for use m ]-5.1 ?.1 to de[ermme the number of design sprnkkn is a space that is complftely enclosed by walls and a ceiling, The companmens enclosure may have openings m an adjoining space If the openings have a minimum lintel depth of 8 in. 120? mm; from :he ceiling 2-S.L3 K'uer Demand. The water demand (or the system shall be determined by multiplying the d<ssgn discharge of +s i i i... .4c -.-N• ~~ aeaigu spnnamn or L5.1.2. 2-5.1.4 Sprinkler Coverage. 2-3.1•a.i Residential sprinklers shall be spaced so Chas the maximum area prosect<d by a single sprinkler does not exceed 147 sq It (13.4 m'l. E.ecepnon: Sparal retidrnba( spanklets shall 6e msml/ed rrt accordance wuh the Irstrng fimuanans. 2.5.1.73 Sidewall sprinklers shall be posiuoacd so That the dea<cton are wnhm 4 to 6 in. I l C2 to I S? mini from the caling. E.rcepnore Speoial reridenria! rpnnk(ers shcL be installed rn accordm.ce wuh the lrarng Lmuanons 2-5.1.7.3' Sprinklers shall be posinoned so that the re- sponse rime and discharge are not unduly adected by obstructions such as ceiling slope, beams, or liens Iixnu«. 2-5.2 Deign Cri«rie-Outride Dwellin{ Cnit. The de- sign diuhargc. number of design sprinklers. water demand piths system, sprinkler coverage, and povuon of spnnklen for areas to be spnnklered outside the dwelling unit shall comply with specifications in NFPA 13. Srandard for the /nsmllatron a/Spr;nkler Svrtems. &rceptron Y'o, l: When romoarrmenred mm areas o% 300 sq jt M6 mr) ar!eu by JDm+nure fns-cored canttraruon. and the area rt prcrared by nandard or gwck-resporue tprinkkrr not erneding 130 sq ft !11 m'1 per Jprinkler. the ty+rem demand may br limierd so the number of sprinklers m the mmpanmenr area. but nor /rsr than a toml ofJour rprinklers. Openings /rom the compartments nerd net br rotated providedsurh openings an provided w(rh o Ifnrel ar Parr 8 in. (IOJ mm/ in depth and the rota! area of rush opemngt does not extend SO tq ft /I.6 cot) for enrh rompartmrM. Discharge density shall br appropriaa for the hazard dpsnfuanon as determined by NFPA /J. facepnan ,5'o. 1; Lobbier, in other than hotels and motels. lovers conidors. and hallr outside the dwelling time wuh /lat. smooth cnlings aril not esctrding /0 fi /3,0 m/ rn height, may br amr/rrrd ».ou ....w._;.•C ~~,(••d(.~,. »od u maximum rystem demand afloat sprinklers. 2-SJ Pipe Sialry. Piping shall be sired in accordance with hydraulic calculation procedures to comply with NFPA 13, Srandard for the /mm((atton of Sprinkler Syrtemr. 2-5.1.4.2 the maximum d;nantt between spnnklen shall not exceed p it I?.? ml and the muimum distance to a wall or partition shall not cxcted 6 ft (1.8 ml. 2-S.LJ.3 1hr minimum distance bclween sprinkler with- in a compar[mcm shall be e fi 13.4 ml. 2-S.LS The minimum opentin{ pressure of any sprinkler shall be in accordatstt with the listing in(ormalion of the sprinkler and shall provide the minimum Bow rates spas- fied m '-5.1.1. 1.5.1.6 Application rates. design areas. area of coverage, and mini mum design pressures ether than those specified in ]-ALI. _'-5. 1.?. ]-S.IA. and '-5.1.5 may be used with spenal sprinklers shat have been hstcd for such specific revdennal mssallauon conddtans• 2.5.1.7 Pasitlop of Raideatial Spdakkn. 2-5.1.7.1 Pendent and upright spnnklen shall be polo Ironed so shat the dellecton arc within I to J in 133.4 to 102 mini Irom the cnhng. :Z6 Lan/Iw af£igebklteg. Sgfddm shW be iisstelkd in'•. aRereu i 8.xnprbn No. C Sprink(nr may be omitted from, barh• roomy not exrrrding SS sq Jt /5.! cot) roan noncambutub(r plumbing fixsuar. [ -Exrtpion No. 1; Sprinkler may !x omited /rom small clprhn dasrrt when the lenrr dimensmn des nor acerd J fi /0.9 m/ and rhr arm dots nor extend 11 tgJr (1.2 mr) and the walls and ceding are turfpcrd wuh nonmmbatnb/e ar limn- ed rombusrtblr mnrerials m drr4nrd 5`y NPPA 110. Srandard or : Ljas al Budding Canrfntcfton. Exreprron No. 3: Sprink/rrs may br omitted from open artacAN.• parches, balronirs, ronidort. and stairs. ExrrWion No, k Sprinklers maY br omitted from attiss. pent erquspmrnr rooms, scowl spares /loon/ceding spar- . rs. elrvaror she/v, and other ronrmlyd spare: that are nay acrd or intended for living purposes ar namgr. ~J Y-T Maiatelfaoce• The owner is rnponable for the ~~~- dumn of a sprinkler system and shall leap the system m normal operating sandman. isw tmcn 138-12 1VSiA4ATIGN OF SIRPetfA SYSTEMS IY aL51OEMpL CCNr1NQF} Ue m FOUa SIaRIFa IN HEIGM Chapter 3 14fercecea Pabllndou }I Thr(ottowirg documents or pottions tnermf a¢rcftr- cnced wrhm Niz standard and snail sx considered pan of the requirements of shis document. The edition indicated for each reference a the current edition u o(the date of the NFPA issuance of th[s document. 3-1.1 ,1 PPA Publications. .ti'anonal Fire Protection Asso- ctauon. Battcn march park. Quincy, MA 02269. V FP4 15-1989. Srandard (or the Ixsmllarion afSprinkler Scslemr NFP4 20.198'. Standard for the lnsmllafron of Cennifu- gal Flee Pumps NFPA 27-1987. Smndord jnr Wafer Tanks far Fnvare fire £rorernon SFP4 '3-1982 Srandard !or [he /nsta(la+imr..Namte- nance. and C'se o(HOUSehold~Fire Warning Equlpmenl NFPA Iola-1988, Gft Sojerv Code' NFPA 220.1985. Standard on Tvpes ofBui/ding ConsJrur- flan. }1.2 Other PoElintbos. 3.1.2.1 AN'S1 Pobbntioea. American National5nodardt lauitute, loc., 1430 Broadway, Yew York. NY 10018. ANSI 016,1.1975. Case fron Pipe fianRr5 and flanged Flumgs. Class I5. 115. 250 and 800 ANSI BI6.3-1965, .tfalleable /eon Threaded Fittings. Cla-rt ISO and 300 A vSI BI6.a-1985. Cart Iron Threaded Finings, Ciaurr ;IS md'JO A.`JSI B 16.5-198;, Pepe Flanges and Flanged Firrrngr uidi-roan, raerory-.Made Wraughf Snr/ Butr- we(drrzg fa{mgS ANSI 816.11-1980. Porged Stn(Flrnngr. Sockeh lie/ding and Threaded AN91 B16.18.1984, Cart Copper ,4!/aY Saldn loin! Prrr- ture F'rRngt ANSI 816.22.1980, Wrought Copper and Coppn Allay Solder /cent PrettWe Fiumgt ANSI BI6.25-1986, Buuwe/ding Endt ANSI Bl6JOM•1983. Welded and Srdmlear wrought Steel Pi,>e }L13 ASTb1 Publintion. American Society for Tasting and Materials. 1916 Ran Street Philadelphia, PA 19107. ASTM A53-1987, Srandard Sperifration for Prpe. Sfael, Bark an.i No;~D.pr-d. Zin[-Caused Welded and Sramles: Stee/Plpe ASTM AUS-1986. Srandard Spmr/cation for Elernin Retumnce-Gelded Sierf Plpe ASTM A17S-1987, Standard SpeciJiration for Pipiry Fir- Ongr of Kiunghl-CarDOn Sree(and Alfoy Sreef for .Nrxlrnte and f(n~ared Rmpenturea ASTM A795.1983. .SperrRrauon far Black and Nat- Drpprd ZmnCoated IGalranr:edl Wel4~d and Smmleu Slerl Prpe for fv~ Probcnort Lsr ASTM 832.1987, Smndtrd Specifrcarion for Solder .Metal, 95-5?in-Mrimony-Grade 93TA) ASTM BBB-1986. SrandaM Sprciftcotion for Seam(rts Copper Water Tubr ASTM 03561987, Standard Speeifxarion far General Regwremrnrr jor Wrought Seam/eu Copper and Cappn- ,si(oy Tube ABTM E780.1986, SroMard/ar ,Metric Pracrrce. 313.J AWS Poblintbe. Amencao Welding Society, 2507 N.W. Ah Street. Miami, FL 33V25. .4W5 ,45.8-1781, Spicgicarion jor tlracmg fir/er ,NemJ. Appeedia A rhu.IPpMix u,rcn apvn olrN npwrmmu fMu NfPn dmwnenr. 8w u ~nrludnl£or.nformaturn pupve wd/. MLI NFPA I )R is appropriate for use only is rnidrntial occupuctiea, u ao option to NFPA 13. Standard jor [he ]mtallation of Sprinkln Syrterru, as defined in Chia stao- dud, up to four atones in hei{ht. RnideodW portion of any other buildio{ may be protected with residrntiai sprio- klen in accordance witb }I 1.2.9 of NFPA 13, Sfondard/or fee Imrdlarian ofSpnnkln Syttems, Other portiotu of sucb aeatiom sboWd b! protected is arWrdantt with NFPA 13. The criteria io this standard ate baled on fWl•scale fin testa of rooms contaiping typial furnisldttp found in raidegtial iiviog rooms, kitchens, and bedrooms. The fw- niahinrs a+r. .......~ :: :r ~:::::t 'wuuu iu uweiutr{ untlf in a mincer similar to that shown in Fi{ures A-1•Ip). (b), and Ic). Siaty fWl-scale file reap wen noducted io a two-smry dwe0ih{ ie Im An{elp, Catifonia, and 16 tesu were moducltd io a 14•ft (!.}m) wide mobile home in Charbtte, North Carolipa. Sprinkler syatema deaipted and inaW led aocordiy W this standard are ettsened to prevent aswrota{ m mu sraoaaro retry m noosed a dro ipvdviru uhi bull, wofi{untiom of Poek other than those withtypical mideobal otxvpaocks, or cotWitiom where the iparior finish has ao uowusdly hs{t Same spteW ntin{ ;Fearer iMe 225). To be eSeetive, sprinkler systems innallM io atsordahn wish Ibis standard mtrn Mvc the spriaklen :bast to the hr. oPep hefo(e the fire exceeds the ability d the sprinkler diuhar{e ro exbrt{uiah of cohtrd shat rte. Cottdilwm Ihat allow the tin to {row beyotW That point before tprirskkr activation or teal ielerfM wiW the VUalitY of water dinri- bution ash produce coaditi0hs bcyahd the gp.btlitia of the sprinkler system described ih thin s4pdard. Unwwlly hi{b aeilih{s or ailio{ coo6{untiohs riot tend ro divert the risin{ hot gases from sprinkler ioadom or ebao{e the sprinkler diuhar{e pattero from in sandard pattero un produce 8rc nnditiom riot canna be extin{uisbed or comrolled by tba ryssems described in ihb standard. „~r,~ i ~- D Ornpr N N~9nt5pnE CH CMft L LtmD For SI U01Y: I m. ~ 33A mm. FIpr9 A-1-1(nl Bt4aolll .ir~~yrenm Nkbiit Mom• 8•trDmrl leaeem a. n+i _,.r.,~~f He ww eD.re f 19nrtmn Q Sprinnim (W Curmnf 0 Orlfp! C Linn B BM i'w 53 Ueiu l in. • 33A mm. Flpn A-1-1(q MDNM Netm BNrotm. E -Eno Tnblt LW - Curlxm L-Lamp Q-$Dnnkllf For 51 VnIY: I m. • 31.a mm. F(~ A•Ird^(tl lJnlq tees. `t-'~ 13R-11 IN'STnLLV ION OF SPRINKLEK SYSTE.NS !V 0.nmENiIAL IX]CUPW<:n lP TO iOCa SRIKIn IN XEIGF? T~Uk A-1-3 Aoed Aransas or Deetb evil lojerka to Apaetmeeb 19aP19ar Fim-I 21,000 Ci.iliu Deetha-9l0 CIri1W leleriea-S,QO Rmatyea by Am or Od{is Arn of Origin (901 Codel Ciriliu DeetM IL'sed [a RukioQ Fim Ciriliu lajedn L1nng room. tlcn. mange I lit }8.5 1 LJ 31.2 Bedroom l'I~"1 ]B.t It.i 31.1 IClahm 1233 98 J5.3 3t2 Flallwar :orndor 110! I i.J J.2 } 3 Immcr ualruas 1011 ~ 3' I,0 i 1 i'0-191 Structural 4«a 3 I 8.: 3,5 ;Balcony porch l-:Q 11.21 ILJ) IO. t) [L'nspeuhcd l"91j IL01 10.5) 10.21 ICaimg Roof assembly I'311 10.31 10,'1 10.37 Lobby 1051 L} 0.6 0] Dlnmg room l`_71 L3 0.8 L0 Clnset lJ_t I `_ 19 1 9 Balronr, parch 1-'_I I ! Ll 0] Other mown vngle area a I 17,8 8.8 Idathroom 0511 10.6) Q.I7 11.31 Mulllple artu I9%1 1.6 O.t 0.9 L'ndasnfied. not applicable 198A91 L8 0.6 0.5 Tout: 100,0 100.0 100.0 A-42 Isrela of ProtMioa. Various levels of sprinkler protection ate available to provide life safety sail property protection. The standud is dmigned to provide a high. but not absolute. level of I ifc safety and a Icsur level of properly protection. Greater protection to both life and properly could be achieved by sprinkledng ail area in accordance wuh NFPA 13. Standard for Ihr lnsmllmmn of Spnnklrr Astrms, which permits the uu of mideotial sprinkles io residential areas. Thn standard rccomm<nds. but dos not require, sprin• klerlrag o(all areas in the building; it permits spdnklen to be omumd m certain areas. Theca area arc the ass shown b~ V FP.4 statistics to b< ors where the incidenLro of life loss from fires in r<slden[ial occupancis is low. $uch an ap• proach pronldes a reasonable degrtt of fire safety to life. I See Table ~J-1 I'or Deaths and /rt/urtrs m .Nu/slfamdy Resrdenuul Buddlhgs) It should be recognized that the omission of sprinkler from certain areas could result is the devebpment of untenable condmons m adjatmr. spats. When evacuation nines may be delayed, addisiosuJ sprinkler protection and other fire protection features, such ss ddection and com• panm<ntanon, may b< neceaaq~. A-2-LJ1 T<snng o(a system ~:an be aaomDlished by L° Gg ~• - - .. •, ..- iuv UiriL ag nu.liy m leakage at each jowl or coupling. Fire depanment connections arc sat required for all sustains covered by thb smndard, but may be installed at slit discrcuon o(the owner In these cafes, hydrostane tats 1n accordance with NFPA 13, Sandard for the Innollanon o/Spank/er Svsrems, are required. Dry systems should afro be treed by placin{the system under air pressure. Anv leak that results in a drop in system prssure grcuer Shan 2 pa 10.11 baq in 2/hour should be corrected. Check for IeaW usio{ soapy water brushed o0 each joint or coupling Leaks will be shown by the prexnce o(bubbls. This test should be made prior Io conttaling of Piping A-1-2.1.1 At ienar rhree spare sprinkien of each type, temperasurt sting, and orifitt size used in the system should be kept oa slit premiss. When fused sprinkles are replaced by the owner, fire deputmenL or oNen, care snnuid be rues ro snare rhos Lhe repsattmem spnnKbr ru the time operating chanaeristin. A-2.3.2 Connection for fire protection to city mains is often subject to local regulation rnnttming metering and backBow prevention requircmmts. Preferred and accepta- ble water supply artan{emrnb are shown in Figun:s A•2.7.2(a), Ibh and lc). Whrn a maer mwt be used between the city water main and the spripkler system supply, an acceptable arnngemmt is shown in Figure A-2-3.2(c1. Under these <irLVmsun<s, the Bow <haraeteristis of th~: meter mwt be included io the hydrwlic cakvlation of [h.: system. When a uak is usW for both domstic and fin: protettim purposes, a low water alarm acuated when me water Icvel falb below 110 pertain of [he miaimum quanti• ty specified io 2.3.1 sbolald be provided. A•2•lJ,l The nbkb on the folbwin{ pa{e can be used ^•temt:rs a ^_nmeztic dsi{a ^_etasad. L'siag Tsb!s A•2.3,7.1(al, dttermiae the LoW Dumber of water supply fizturc uniq dowmtmm of say point is the pipia{ servo{ both sprinkler and IWmstie needs Usie{ Table A•2-3.3.1(b), determine the appropruu toW Sow allow• once, and add this Uow m the sprinkler demand at the to- W preuurc required for the spriokkr system at that point. A•id.g.9.2 Deconlive painting of a roidential sprinkler is not to be confused with the tempeature Identifinuon bwtamm ~ V' 1 Mani Gtv Gam valve To Damnvc IZ~.TD Svslsm -~cn rm ~~ Ja .e Domenic Waver Snu:-oll -.'.pert 3 •J r••1!t?~ • ! i •¢ ~ p.e S3V'iB Gd9e Vdire Ya ~ erne Tes: T'om' Detecmr a - •reswre Gage I To Automata 4 Sarmeier ff 5ystem Figure A-1-J.2(al l'reknbk Arnoeeatevh Wamr Mani Gny Gate Valve Comrol VaWa Wuer 'R.eberFxN IOebon Rflarlnef Mnar Cneck Valw gA l 1 Esueobon No, 11 Pressure Gpa Dvmnbc Sbm-oft -~~~4Vnn Fow Nlvr Dram d~tl Tevt DfiKtor Connxvvn Prxrun Gpa _ yV" us I Tn a~.r,.... e..• ~ ~ Spnnaer ~ brrtem eu 5ystem Fignn A-SJ.2(b) AttegkbN ArtaaesMat wltb Vflw SupfnislM. ISer 1-g, 1. / fsrrpnon.3 Mani Malw Water Flow W/kr Det6td SnnnklM Mebr Prenwe G Control Nlw Mwn Donrlol ~ IOpbbn.Rflfrfnce Va1w Tu Awamauc J~L1 Eeeepnm To Domnts Svrmk.ar sve~.m I No.+, c.:::may y Domfsnc Pnswn Gap gnus-afl Orin an0 Taft Va1w Connacoon 'Rubber FKA Cback Vnva ' Rvbbn FMen CbKk V alvee DenONI Figure A-2-0SUI .leagtabN Amll{feHS witY VJn Su~enlf W. ISrr 14, I ! fsreprun.l k IJR-IS T~bN A-2J~.Ip1 Flalve Lane Valfn Rink ktllitb Iwit4la laaahnd ewe!Ilae avfk/ k'nis Rmhroom group wsth Owh lack linduding lasatory, wamr closes. avd baWtub wub showeq 6 nashroom group with Bush valve g Bathtub Dishwfshtt ~ Kitchen sink huvdry tnys 3 tawsory I Shower sell Washing muhiae 1 Water rlnxr Wqh Buv`. v yr b Water clout wrth Oush uvk 7 PoMk fleillnn Bathtub + Dnn7uvg fouvniv 0 Kitchev sink + hvatorv Servlm link 3 7hower head + V rid wan : io. Osuh valve IO Vriml wtb b iv. flush valve 5 U noel viN Otu6 tank 3 Washivg tnac4ioe la Ibl 3 wyhivg muhix 11614) a Water dose witb dash valve I O Waur closet wll6 Aua6 tavk 5 7abk A-2.7.7.10) Taal F.adraaM Ovraatle DepN Toni 77Ftsva ipd DrsuM If GalkaH M Mivrae I.oN Ualb For S/ataa•a wld Far 5)ateln wiN Ird,.lkw rrr++...d) Rrga.launy A4-7J.IIfN FIW Tu4 Flute Vdwa I 7 gpm 2 5 S 10 I S gpm 10 IS ''-7 20 20 75 IS 27 +5 SD 30 30 70 33 60 100 OS 10 ISO 55 80 100 65 90 250 73 100 350 100 ISS 300 I15 150 130 111 X75 11700 200 W If00 217 215 2000 317 323 3500 300 700 colon u referenced in ;.I 1.6 of NPPA 11. Smndard for the lnsm/lmion o/SprinWn SYtrema. A4-S.1.2 It if intended that the dai{n am is w include up to four adj7cem sprinkler producin{the {reatess water demand within the computmenl. A-2.5.1.7) Firc testin{ bas indicated the need to wet walls in the area protetted by midennai spnnklers err a level ""~ IM koaw IJR- I6 INTIAWTION Or SMINaIE! SYSrEA61N I{61pQNnAL OCCI;MNCIEi Vr 10 rplR SlVlllp IN NEIGHr ~T~ r'-r-r Gilin9 eial~ Owen ~~ o.r sm•I~ewww~q«aasa.s Fiawe A :-S.s.Yai SINiaWu Ddp Arta for TyPwai RailkotisJ l)MFaKy. tnslw om~l also lo..a•~~n ~.~ r... closer w she ceiling shoo shat accomplished by ssmdard <nnnklq diemhwinn WFrn Mum li•M A.r,.... .In....l ceilings, and ocher obswmiom occur, ndditiooal resitkR- sial sprinkl<n may be necessary t0 achieve proper sapoox and 0lstnbution, and a greater water supply mry be Rear nary. Table A-2-5.1.7.3 a0d Fipn A-2.5.1.7.7 provide guid• once for locauoo of spn0kl<n near ceilisy obsWCtiana TWk A-2.3.1.7) Mnlm~ DMrs ham BprYWw Mllaalm to Bolcom d CdBaO Olammllw Rlaalm~ DWm Rw• Dlstmse Rom $IMdM b to SNe d Ceillp Ohatraetlaa CdBy Ohsbwlll~ ltll 18m 6 m. Nq plrmiste0 6 m. m lea lasn l fl d ia. I f1 fa ins lbm 2 h I m. 1Rlo kas rhm2R6in. tin. 2fl6m. to lea Noe lfl Sin. J R to Ina than ] fl 6 in. 1 in. Jfl6m. to kns thanlfl 6ia. Ifltalw thmlh6in. Tin. Ifl6m. to lea than Sfl 9io. S fl to Im than S R 6 in. I I in. Sfl 6 m. to leu thin 6 fl 11 io. For 51 UmU: I in. • SSA mm; I ft • O, pM1 m. I1M eaial to EFCaa vtrsa Iwo 1721 -/ Mpimum 0nicnn Oa/lector ANOVe eauom of Gamq OMtrucuon rJnnnn From Nor $'DI o/ Culue Obarvcuo:. Flpn A•3-0.1.77 tAwhha d DoBoanr, UmyN w IRMeae 7VM ImW Abn Balsam d CNBp OMOmtba. A-2J The rapaosibility forpmpedy mainniningasprin- kler system is the obliptioo of the owuu or manager, who should uodesstmd the sprinkler system operation. A mini- mum monthly malRteOanCG propam shoud iRClud! the followioF (a) Vimul impesnioR of all spridelas to emuse agaitut obrtrumioo of spray. (b) lnspMioR of all valve m assure that they art opm. (c) Toting of all watsrBosv device. (d) Testify of the alarm system, if itutalled. NOTE: Whra it oppwn likey f8m Om tm will rmuls in a rttpoam d sh! dR OeWtmeat, a0si0ratlm m th! firt departmms 1801110 Re made pnor w IE! tnL (!) ClperatioR of pumps, where employad, slwWd 6e operated. See NFPA 20, SrandBN Jar JAe lnN011arion of Crnrn/udRl £In Pumps. (t) CTlcldog oFthe preswra of av uud wish dry systems. IB) Checking of water Icvel iR tat1W. Ttlls A-2.7 lasaaedaa. Tm1a6 W Afalaalaomm Bgdrampn Csmppnl AnhMy Pnr~y Bafwe Caatrd Valve Irmpoctioa Monthly Maiasmaam AmmDy NFTA IIA, 2-7.1.1 Main Dnia Value Flow Tms Amaally N1RA 1 JA. le etton~ 2d.1 ry Teal Vdw Flow Tml Amadly lVarergow Alum Fbw lkm Amually NFTA IJA. 47.), LI1 SpdekNn Tal 50 Yra NFPA I)A. 7.7.7 Spnnk4n. RNQR Tem 20 Yn NFTA I IA, }J,1 Pump Flow Tem Aaaudly NFM I)A, 2~S.I AOtifrtm Solmiaa Twl AmoWy NFPA IJA, //^/^ 47.7 WW FIBme A-2-5.1.210) SFS1aLMr Delp Ana14 7yFld RnlMdal OraFla7. (hl Case should he taken m see that Sprinklers arc vot painted either at the time of iwW4tioo or during subse- quent redaoratioa. Whev pain[in{ sprivkkr Piping or painting in arena vext to sprinklM, th< sprinklers may be protected Dy coveAn{ with a DaF which should 4 removed tmmediauly after paintiv{ is fivifbed. For further informatiav see NFPA 13A, Recommended Pracme for the lnspmrion. Tearing and .Maintenance of Sprmkier Svsremr. APOeadfx B RefetenoN P~bllntlms B•1 The following docum<oU or portion thereof are re(eren<ed within this standard far informational purposes only and thus arc not considered part of Ne requircmenb of skis document. The editiov ivsliated for each rcfercntt u the curnn[ editiov fa of the date of the YFPA iuuance of thif documevl. B-I.I NFPA PaDlkadoaa. Natiowl Fire Protection Also- ciatiov, Batterytssarc6 Park, Quimy, MA 02269. NFPA 13.1989, S(andard for the (msdlarion oJSprinkler Syssema NFPA 13A•1987, R¢mmmended Procrice for the (nfprc- rion. Teeing and iNainrenance ofSpnnk(er SYS(emr NFPA 20.1987, Standard for the lnsra(farion of Censn/o- ga! Firc Asmr . ~ c~~ ,_.~ IJR-18 IaSfALUTIOw Of 5<0.1\kIER SYTi E.NS IY RESIDEMAt OCCI'MNCIES UP }O FfN11151DFIE5IY HEIGHT li~dae C 19[9 Yypml fire Pmacurn Aafonygn. all nfpo nursed. Thr ropvn[na.n ~hn indea .a uPann and dnalnc[ hem the copmyM m [h<doc9mm[.mich n !Mecca The IkemM P~^^P^^a u[ Fonh M iM dacemm[ ue i applicable ~9 tnn inaea ibn ~ndta maf rw[ M repod9ced'n Mde a ~n pan by w meW V~Neua the ezpv wnnm erwmn d do Nav9nd Prc Prdeamn auMUnon Inc A. AcveP~'ar [care. !•17. 42.I J.! FIusMM und[rgm'und mnnecvom. !-IJ I zlaema. ...a »ue vow Dehm!lon IJ anrUrene adwbu I-0 3.1 Apprt..J of ayraema !d ~, Flt !.I ]. t Pmsmiev of .... ... ... Ib2 Suiv[of .... .... ... ... ... .. YJJ leppon. ,. .,... :.aa pfv/ Aw~a. perpwe. . .aMa: ~ . a +, l u aed bl ~ ~ IJMnihw .... ...... ... IJ vsefceae ps ... .. .. !.a 3 [r9f[erbe. Imtlf d .... .. .A-I.2. Fiµ A-I~I la IhN q. Tad<Mld perp9w dapedud .... ... .,,,, W.A. b! R C. Com9^oeoaa. rTa[am 'J faeembw. Sae depertmev[ AQ~I J, ], tr1J! D- Oeel~ add InaWletb9. A3. MI8 Dcam and maunab. .. SS.I. AQ-2.1 Ahem, .. .... IJ. A-3~5 ~Cnrena.'mlde dwelhM unn.. A5.1 ~ Crnma. PUhlde dw<Illnt unn.. , 1-5 2 ... Flrtinunl. ., A.YIJ.I Spam componenu .:J .. weer app1Y '• S. MEd .,.. . Oul~dkcWate. stt D:scCU[e lkie<[w. ~a[erBO+ D<hnmon. ..FS w.ae..[e. cap lkfimuon .... I-) 11ea1m 0. bb.llbl, M1-I l1 Delimuon ... W Owelllot mh Dmnlli9n IJ p. plnleP. ..,..... L5.1. bt> blmenals and dimemlam ...... Table L5.1 ImItllWan., ......, aK OaLp aPd lnaWklron ). bleu. .., ... I.+R M- 1lnldaarW xavpuale Deflnmov ... .......... ..... .. dJ t• !cope Maleelivd ... .. ... ...... ... .. .....L1. MLI ypautlaaa ......... ...... ... ..... ... ....2.a.1 Au[omaW DeEmG9e .. .. ..... ....~. .. .... .., .. ... .1.1 Corerc[a ........ . .. ...... ... ......... .......2J.lA Laecu9v d ................ ..... .................. ..lb Ndmbnd ............... ...... .~ .,..... 3.1,62. A-2-51.2 PaivuM c90 omamenW [viNn ...... ........ 2J,5,9. M2J,1.9.3 Peuu9a d ........... ..... ..... ...... ... 2.1I + a.3.5.!.+ Pm4aW :......... ... ...... .. .3J.5.1 3J SA, ibd.5 a[dlbn ............. ... .... ........ ....... .. IJ as ems..... ~.... .~. rv.a_.... ...... .. I-J MueStvevu ...... .. ..... ..... ...... ..... L9. A-34 lhbmuva ..... ............ .,... .. IJ r- Tefu .... . ~ .... .. .. ... see Aacapavo<uw -V- b'dY W iwaenrw.. .. ~ .... .. ..1J •V- Vyae .... .... ......... ........... ..... ......3.1.1 CLx[ JMnilw[,... ...................... .. ... Ll rnbw Uehvil[w ... .... ....... .. ....... .. ....IJ .V. .MewaesreL sre Unm d mnwumem . .. .. 1ar.e dent .. .. .... ... ... Sd,L) . . •acceaq/Ir .. .~.,........ ,~. ...., „ ... r ~ . , :.).1. A-373 ....... ~N wa s .fe awns 91la Rw9r.., .. I-0.I Hple[.. 1 OMmlidl. .. ....... ... 1-, 1 ' )launch +nd Jlmenuvm ,Talk 65.1 SivOJM /V W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~..deen ~r ~$ E><~~~~f „Cn Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Installation Standards for Quick Response Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems Per Rancho Cucamonga City Ordinance ??, all residential fire sprinkler installations shall comply with NFPA 13D or NFPA 13R Standards (1985 Editions) with the following revisions: NFPA 13D One- and Two-Famil Dwellin s and Mobile Homes 1. Revise 1.5.1.2, "Exception:" to read: Exception: Listing may be waived jot tarsks, pumps and for hanger as permitted by 3.4.7 only, These items however, must be approved by the Fire District. 2. Revise 1-5.1.4 to read: All systems shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standards. All systems shall be Flaw tested in accordance with RCFPD Standazds. f T6i „r .4:. "~ ~~ - ~ -~."%•y: .. :o wur,c yruper inSraiiatlon procrdalCt woe emplayrd, and to give-added assurance agairut future failure.) 3. Group R pivision 3 Revise Chapter 3 to add a section 3.7 to read: All buildings exceeding 5000 squaze feet shall have installed with an approved fire department connection (FDC) in accordance with RCFPD Standards. 4. Revise 3.1.1 to delete "Exception (c)" (The intent o! this ehangg it to astute that tF.e bu[!d[nA ueeuaaar eGnwt noc- sibiy disable Jhe syrrem with out disabling domestic water.) - 5. Revise 3.6 to delete the Exception, and add: The water flow alarm shall be located on an exterior wall of the master bedroom, such other location, as approved by the Fire Chief. i ~q (The intent of deleting the exception is ro assure that an audible evacuation device is rounded upon sprinkle acttvatian, Tht intent of the M. bedroom flaw alarm location is to backup the smoke detector as an alarm for the bed- room most likely to bt occupied. /t Js rot ehe intent of this section to require alarms for every master bedroom in a stngle building. !7 is the initm of this section to allow Jlextbtliry to fhe location requirement so that the alarm is placed in The best location to alert occupants inside and neighbors, passerby, uc. outside, of a water flaw in case the occupants are wt at hams ) 6. Revise 4-b, "Exception 2,2,3,4,5", to read: Exception: Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces, and other concealed spaces that are no[ used or intended for living purposes or storage. (AII other czceptiona are delded.) ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT DATE: Iunc 5, 1990 ( ) 7Q Chairman and Members of the Public Safety Commission '~ FROM.: L. Dennis Michael. Fire Chief BY: Lloyd B. Almand, Division Chicf/Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Findings of Fact for Residential Aummatic Fire Sprinkler Ordinance: Consideration of recommendation to the City Council for approval of a Resolution detailing the Findings of Fact relating to the Ordinance Requiring The Installation Of Automatic Fire Sprinklers in Single and Multi-Family Dwellings. IL BAl^_KGR~OI r The Stetc of California, through its Health and Satcty Code, mandates that Findings of Fact be adopted whenever a city or county makes changes or modifications in the requirements contained in the provisions published in the State Building Standards Code (i.e. Uniform Building Code) that are considered to be reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or Innnaranhiral ~.,n:w.... Although the law states that only one of the three aforementioned conditions needs to exist when filing the Findings of Fact, we have presented evidence on all three of the areas in an effort to substantiate more clearly and definitively the prohlems that exist within the City and which emergency personnel hare been and can be confronted with. Also, we have added a new dimension to the findings in that we have included graphic illustrations oP what we have detailed in writing io an effort to add clarity and proof to our findings o[ fact. Attached are copies of the correspondence scot to the Building Industry Association (BIA) and to the Chamber of Commerce advising them of the proposed Ordinance sad this public hearing. Res a tfully submilte/~ _ ' L. Dennis Michael Fire Chief LDM/ja ~I n~ y.,~ v RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT rosy D(fi<a &n g!0, f4ncFw Cucamonga. Glilornu a1: 01-0gg0, pW vgl.29i April 23, 1990 Mr. Hill Ruh Building Industry Association Baldy View Region 9227 Haven Avenue, Suite 280 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Ruh: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council, acting in their capacity as the Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, has directed staff to prepare a proposed ordinance requiring fire sprinklers in residential occupanices. The Fire Hoard/Council considered your letter of request to assist in drafting the ordinance on April 18, 1990, Staff was directed to draft the ordinance, forward a copy of the draft to the B.I.A., and advise you of the opportunity for public input during a public hearing process. On June 5, 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga Public Safety Commission will hold a public hearing regarding the proposed ordinance. The City welcomes your input as part of the hearing process. The Commission is expcted to forward its recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the ordinance after considering public input and the requirements contained in the proposed ordinance. The City has always welcomed input from developers, business and the general public regarding matters of mutual concern and benef }.t. The approach utilized Sn this process is conaistant with the City's endeavor to provide an open forum where all parties can once again take part in improving the quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga. i 7a- Mr. Bill Ruh April 73, 1990 Page Two Should you have any qustions, or would like to discuss this matter in further detail, please contact my office. S'ncerely, ~/~//.///,// L. Dennis Michae, 7.~~±f'~ Fize Chief LDM/rh cc: City Council Public Safety Commission Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development /Lloyd Almand, Fire Marshal 7z rr ~ --- ~ - -------------- 1 RAN[HO CJCAMONGA FIRE PAOTECfiON DISTRICC Pmt Ofhn gas 95g. R,nrAO CYamonga, Gplomu 91i 01 -0850. ^l,l 9g>']US May 21, 1990 Danielle Watson, Executive Director Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 8280 Utica Avenue, Suite 130 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Danielle: This letter is intended to advise the Chamber of Coamlerce that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in conjunction with the Rancha Cucamonga Fire Protection District, will soon be considering ar. ordinance requiring automatic fire sprinklers in residential occupancies. The proposed ordinance will apply to the new constzuction of single and multi-family residential occupancies, and will not affect current requirements for commercial/industrial buildings. On ,Tune 5, 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga Public Safety Commission will hold a public hearing regarding the proposed ordinance. The City welcomes your input ae part of the hearing process. The Commission is expected to forward its recommendation to the City Council (tentatively scheduled for June 20, 1990) regarding adoption of the ordinance after considering public input and the requirements contained in the proposed ordinance. The City has always welcomed input from developers, businaea and the general public regarding matters of mutual concern and benefit. The approach utilized in this process is consistent with the City's endeavor to provide as open forum whets all parties can oncw again take part in improviny^ the quality of life in Rancho Cucamooga. ~1 Danielle Watson May 21, 1990 Page 7Wo Should you have any questions, or would like to discuss this matter in further detail, please conta at my office. Sincerely, n . De Michael Fire Chief LDM/rb cc: City Council Public Safety Commission Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Develo went Lloyd Almand, Fire Marshal ~~ RESOLUTION NO. rDRAfT A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY'S B U[LDIYG CODE, AS ADOPTED BY ORDWANCE NO. ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY 6ECAU5E OF LOCAL CLLNaTIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS. 1. ~= t"s, ii! C91i G;m is Health and Sa(ey Cndr ecetion ;7n,2^ requires all ciiies to .dept, a- iLc City Bwlding Standards Code, the State Building Standards Code °.:optnd pursuant ;o the provisions of Chapter 4 of Part 2.5 0( Divisicn 13 0( the ...GCo mia Hcal th and Safety Code. !ii? Pursuant to California Govcmment Codc Section SC022.2, the Ci;v oC e Cucmnonga has adopted by reference, the "Uniform Buiiding Codc, (iii) Section 17958.5 of the Cali (ornia Health and Satety Code provides, ,- pcrtincm part, as follows: . a city or county may make such changes or modifications in [he requirements contained in the provisions published in the State Building Standards Code and the other regulations adopted pursuant to Section 17922 as it determines, pursuant to the provisions of Section 17958.?, are reasonably necessary bwause of local climatic, geolcgical or topographical conditions." (ivi Prior to making the modifications permitted under Sectior. 1795&.5 of the California Health and Saferv r`,.•a-, .h:c C;,,,,, ;; ;, rcqutred to make an ~.. ~, cae iinamg tnat such modifications or changes pare needed in accordance µ'ith California Health and Safety Cedc Section 17958.7. (v) This Council desires [o amend the provisions of Section 3802 of the "Caiu;m Building Codc, 1988 Edition". furl All Icgal prerequisites to the adoption oC this Rcsolu [ion have accurrcd. fl, RFSOr U'I'tON• NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Recnlutin.^.. ... This Council does hereby expressly find and determine that the amendments set forth in Oniinance No, amending Section 3802 of the "Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition" are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological and topographical conditions. This express finding is supponcd and based upon the following more specific fi>dings and determinations: / KI Rcsnl mion ~o. I':.g: 2 1. A unique geological condition exists within the City of Rancho Cucamonga in that five earthquake faults are present. which create the potential for scvcrc damage and fire hazards. There is potential also for damage to roadways and impairment of access for fire equipment to respond to cm ergencies in the event of a scvcrc earthquake. Since January I, 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga arcs has bee.^, 1cf:cd ty m icast 28 carthqua5cs and after shocks, ranging from 3.1 l0 5.5 on the Rich:cr Scare. (Sec Exhibit A cad A-I) 2, Advcrsc geological conditions exist throughout a substantial part oC the City of Rancho Cucamonga that give rise to excessive flooding. Flood control facilities arc not adequate to handle the water ;low that occurs during major rains. Some of the streets in the City are actually designed and used for (food control purposes, thus making fire and cmergcncy access difficult during flood Conditions, According Io the City's Engineering Department, using Baseline Road as the median east-west street, during a normal rain season, the following streets arc designed to carry the runoff as indicated: (aj Carnelian Srreet: 1,100 cubic feet per second, or 8.299 gallons per second !~,` -°-=.:!s: n.euue; t,ruU cubic feet per second or 12,717 gallons per second (c) Hormosa Avenue: 2,700 .;obit feet per second or 20,198 gallons per second As a consequence, many of the streets within the City are impaired during such Flood conditions and such flooding causes physical damage to the streets and the accumulation of dtbris, all of which hinder the access of tiro equipment to respond to fire emergencies. (See Exhibit Bj 3. Access of fire equipment responding to calls is often hampered by the adverse climatic and geological conditions within the City, because a^ ~f the Cit>'; ti re .,,a.ionv are ~hc ,-,;.;,,yeriy portion of the City. The notthern area 'of the District is often the most damaged and impaired by the adverse climatic end geological conditions, thereby limiting access of cmergcncy vehicles responding to calls within their own "Ci rst~in" district. (See Exhibit C) 77 i Fcsolution No. Fage 3 B, Tp AvNi AL: The topography of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is generally that of a gently sloping inclined plane which projects from the base of the San Bernardino Mountains, at an elevation in excess of 2400 feet above sea level, in a southerly dircctlon where the elcvalior. is approximately 1400 feet lower Natural slopes of eight percent or greater generally occur in the norh<rn third of the City. [n many cases, slopes in the foothills exceed 40 pcrcenL There are two locations where steeper top^grsphy ..:.. - k[ the southern portion of the City. These two locations areu[he Redhill area and the area directly east of Redhill Park. The elevation changes caused by the mountairs and hills creates the geological foundation on which the City is built and will continue to build. With much of the tladands either already built upon or dedicated for approved projects, it can 6e anticipated that future growth will occur on sleeper Slopes and greater contrasts in terrain. All of these topographical conditions have created slower «sponse times of emergency vehicles into the high growtF. areas, due to the extraordinary uphill slope of the land. C CLIMAX: I. Extreme high winds, commonly referred to as Santa Ana winds, are generated from the desett and reach the basin through Devore Pass and first contact highly-developed areas within City bourdaries at velocities, sometimes in excess of 80 mph. Extensive damage often occurs during such winds, including downed electric wi ros, downed poles, fallen trees, blowin¢ canA awn ru°:. 2. fn recent years, beginning in late 1987, the City has incurred Santa Ana winds ranging in velocity from 80 to 83 miles per hour. On December ]2, 1987, approximately 30 Edison power poles along base Line Road were snapped in half and blown down by the high winds. Those downed poles totally prevented the use of Base Line Road for emergency vehicles. Alternate emergency routes had to be utilized for the next three days. The use of those alternate routes caused delays in what would have been normal and routine emergency responses, 3. On January 22, 1988, winds again caused severe response problems. High vol[age electrical wires were blown down at numaraus locstions throughout the C!ty. Erne: gcrcy apparatus were tied up at those locations pending the arrival of Edison electrical crews, which in some cases exceeded one hour. ~~ P.csol ution Nn. Page 4 4, On February Iti. 1988, winds again hit the City extremely hard. This particular time the high winds generated such a severe blowing sand and dust problem that the emergency units responding to a structure fire cast of Haven Avenue were stopped in their tracks, due to no visibility. That incident not only stopped the emergency resoonsc, but also resulted in significant fire vehicle dam age, These adverse conditions result in: (a) Fircs (Ste Exhibit D) (b) Impairment of fire equipment access (See Exhibit E) (c) Delays in responses of Cire equipment; and (d) Fire personnel znd equipment committed to non- firc emergencies 5. Wtathcr conditions, coupled with flammable vege!ation in the City results in numerous wildland fires, which draw existing fire fighting Forces from their structure protection duties for extended periods of time. This results in extended response times to structure fires when such personnel and equipment are committed to non-structural protection. (See Exhibit F) 3. The City Clerk shall, and hereby is directed to, forthwith upon the adoption of this Resolution, file a certified copy of this Resolution. together with certified copies of Ordinance No. ~ with the California Department of Housing and Community Development as required by Section 17958.7 of the Califomia Heall6 and Saftty Code. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS _ day of 1990. Mayor Resolution tio, Fag: 5 i, DEHRA 1. e:eby certify that aceting of the City day of _ r.;caing of the City day nr ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held ou the 1990, and was finally passed at a regular Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 1990, by the following vote: AYES: Counci! Members: KOG;: Council Members: ,SBS2!~T: Counci: Membca: CSTAI~~C: Counci' Members ATfE1T; City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ ~ _`~ ti° ~P J~ 2 P ¢P y ti O ~ v O G ti0 P N J N a 3 J z ;Q O Q Z c7 6 ~ U 7 U U ~ U r~ a w W ~~6 ~J LL or ~'b ~ /H o ~ bs _ m ~' O Q 0 `.~ z v Y. ~ ~.. ~ J LL W m Q Z N ~ 2 I , Q ~ N ~ / ~ S ~ _ , ) LL ¢Q I ' 1 m J _ Z ~ ,V ~ a 4P D < O ~ Y Q i /~ 4 N i~, 3 EXHIBIT A-1 Origirtal_Poor (qua„~~ cARTHOUAKE ESCARPMENT IN NORTH ETIWANDA AREA IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THIS "MOVING" FAULT LINE MOVPS ( ATFQAI ~v wnnn w....~~. .. .._ ___ ___ AR TI..,, ~,~~„+nrmen ~ h1UN5 LATERALLY BELOW TIDE "BOG" IN NORTH ETIWANDA AND THROUGH THE PLATEAU THAT ONCE WAS THE SITE OF THE U. S. FORESTRY FIRE STATION ~ ~'a EXHIBIT B ,~ a ~~ 0 a m 'n ,~~ O FLOODING ON HERMOSA AVENUE AT CHURCH STREET - 1990 FLOODING ON 4TH STREET AT I.15 1990 ~j~ -~ a ~ j Qi 1 ~ ~/ 1 I w~° ~I 0~ ~~ f a o z ~ = G W V V ~ ~ ~ a Q V ,~y ~ _ I ~ D ~ I i <~ ~~ I '?AY ~Stl3 1 T "~ yl i I ':r1Y Y4N1'AIL' I >I rn < i si :~ ?AY Lnw ~~ JI 5 ~~ i I SAY lIDA1 3AY N3AY ~ ~ ~ I s S (O J N ~ i. ~ m a N N Z `z e ~. W r N ~V~ EXHIBIT D '~7riginal Poor_~uau~y 7sgS~ BRUSHLAND IN NORTH ETIWANDA AREA TEXAS FIRE AS IT CROSSED SUMMIT AVENUE AT EAST AVENUE SCHOOL Q i~ IC_ i21 `% EXHIBIT' E W Z J Q Z 0 yZ Y G Z O J m N W J n a w (7 h- J 0 2 ~_ S 2 O y W 'THICK VEGETATION GROWTH IN AREA NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE TEXAS FIRE BEFORE IT CAME OUT OF CANYON BOWL AND RAN THROUGH ETIWANDA ii 87 E'CHfBiT F The Caryn Company lkxx(OTce Box 9216. Eo. Laguna, G92677-0216 once (714) 499-5920 Fi1X (714) 499-5173 September 5, 1990 Mayor Dennis Stout City Council Members City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 907 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: University Crest PD Dear Mayor h Members of the City Council: Quoting from and responding to the latest Staff Report of September 5: ^A Specific Plan moat be approved prior to Individual project epprovele." This statement is not true. State law allows the procedures we are following. In a simllar manner, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has already annexed and/or approved tow tracts that are part of the originel•Etiwanda North planning area. Since the PD end the Etiwenda North Specific Plan (ENSP) have been under intensive study for more then two years, the County, City end landowners should all know how everything will tie together by now. The studies that Statt lists in its report a^e part7al evidence of the commitment that we, the UNversity of California, Betty McN~y, The Caryn Company (Caryn) end the rest of the land- nWnoPa n n,•Ham Fnv.. .n nA~... 6N~ ~ n _-a - ~'•"" - " ~~ iue ww~ umrougiuy swaiec, env,ron- mentally sound, fiscally resporeible residential development done to date in the County or the City. We continue to invite the City to discuss differing viewpoints. However, to pro- tact our rights, we need to have an appropriate forum in which to state our viewpoints. Under current circumstances, the County appears to be the proper forum. '7Le detnaty is too hfgh." Stet[ overstates the overall density o[ the University Crest PD by 25 to 38 percent (net or gross). Density fs not 3.83 dwelling units per acre but rather about three dwelling units per acre. We commit that no Individual tracts will exceed tour homes to the acre and ell tracts will meet the minimum 7,200 square foot lot size specified fn the City's "L" (2 - 4 dwelling units per acre) density category as requested by Staff and the Planning Commission. As pointed out by Mayor Stout in the City/County/Consortium meeting of May 22, s PD sets it's own standards. The UNversity Crest PD sets it's own standards in that it transfers densities from the north end of the propcay to the south to betier respect site specific conditions. With or without the trereter of density, the PD proposes no more homes than implied by the City's General Plan or specitlcally allowed by the County's. The Staff states that "the City has never supported the County's concept of a density bonus" and, therefore, never should. I believe this opiNon is not in the beat interests of the people of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 believe, as do others, that tt to in the best interest of the people to keep the beautituS Upper Dey Canyon preserved as open space rather than developed Into a number of large, gated, private estates, es would happen were it not for Betty McNey's Mayor Dennis Stout City Council Members University Crest PD September 5, 1990 Page Two 11 year ePPort to protect the property. The City and its residents ere elos receiving a benefit that can be measured in dollars. Betty, one of the official Founders of the City, and a resident of 38 years, is the major owner of the 875 acres. Even subtracting the value of the density traR'e"er and bonus, she is giving away perhaps three million dollars N lend value by volunteaing to keep that property one of the mast beautiful in all this valley as protected open space. It may be generally appropriale for the Staff to concentrate on planning issues end not financial issues, but in this case, the financial benefit is so great it should no" be ignored or belittled. As Larry McNeR, Chairmen of the Planning Commission acknowledp;ed, we believe that part of the benefits of this Plan ere indeed financial, as well as environrt~entaL Indeed, in addition to the open space and public improvements, our Financial Impact Report indicates Etiwanda North would generate over $1,000,000 yearly after paying for ell of its services. "Design criteria is Inadequate." Perhaps Staff means [o say [he design criteria is uncodified rather than inadequate. This PD follows design criteria which, quoting Staff, was "developed Dy the consortium of Etiwenda North landowners, incorporated into the draft ENSP, and reviewed iti severs! Planning Com- mission workshops^. Thane standards become codified for this property when the PD is approved. To insure the success of these unique standards developed with so much effort, we ask that the City respect the standards stave Highland Avenue, especially for major road and parkway designs. In turn, respecting the Planning Commission's com rents to their meeting of Augast 22, we will, when end where appropriate, add paseae andv crease street curves. When appropriate studies justify the change, we will make appitcatioa to increase the size of the neighborhood hub commercial center. As far es we know, the Tentative Maps we attempted to submit to the City in March meet the standards of the City's latest hillside grading ordinance. "&rviranmentel review is inedequate.^ Staff is correct in that the EIR Yor this project was initiated prior to the ENSP's EIR. Indeed, the PD E1R helped formulate the larger Specific Plan EIR. The ENSP EIR hea been s two year effort by the consortium and Staff, and we both should be aware oP the cumulative impacts since the ENSP E[R seemed ready for circulation this peat spring. J Mdieve the cumulative impacts are addressed consistently end comprehensively in both EIRS. if the Etiwande North EIR in its final form significantly modifies some of the mitigation metusures specified in the University Crest's PD EIR, those modifications may be incorporated. 'the traffic issues end precedent setting mitigations incorporated into the PD's EIR reRects over two years of traffic studies by both our consultants end the City's consultants. The result, i believe, can be a harmonious strategy that should set standards for the rest of the City. The PD end Specific Plan ere the only areas in the City or it's sphere that volunteer to mee~[ the standards set by the City's new traffic model, et a cost nearly tMee times greater then the City now charges other development. Simileriy, the PD end Specific Plan perk stanaard of five to seven acres of perk per 1,000 people exceeds the City's requirement of three acres end its unenforced standard of five acres. Schools end the protection services in the PD end Specific Plan also exceed the requirements generally imposed elsewhere in the City. Contrary to StetPs report implication, the PD's E[R was circulated to all appropriate State end Federal agencies as required by law. We also disagree with the impl'lcation that the Maya Dennis Stout City CouncH Members University Crest PD September 5, 1990 Page Three University property on Highland Avenue is a sensitive natwel habitat. A Resowce Manage- ment Plan fs under prepwation but it's indeed putting the cart Detore the horse to maintain that the Resowce Management Plan should be approved prior to the EIR when the Resowce Management Plan is to De sn implementation devise for the findings established by the EIR. The 645 acres is an integral pert of the Resowce Management Plan, and as a major resowce, It's management is addressed in the PD EIR. "Summery and Conchsion.^ The ENSP has been through several community and Planning Commission workshops over the last two years. The Etfwanda community seemed satisfied with the proposed quality of development. The planning effort in Etfwenda North to date has cost nearly two million dollars. 1 believe the City should reconsider startitg that planning process all over again at the tax payers expense, or moving on en annexation that can happen dNy ff the voters in Etiwenda North voluntarily elect to annex. I recommend we remember Mayor Stout's comment that standards in the County and the Clty can be "different" although not necessarily "higher" or "lower^. Then 1 recommend we work cooperatively in a manner acceptable to troth City Councll and the County to insure the highest possible level of commuNty amenities and intrestructwe in a legally and fiscally responsible manner for aH residents north or south of the CitylCounty line. I look forward to futwe meetings with Cfty Council representatives to discuss ways of thawing proper cooti dination and review, Thank you for yow time. Sincerely, !/// Joseph N. Dilorio President JND(jas cc: Mr. Jack Lam Mr. Rick Gom¢z Mr. Brad Buller Mr. Roger 3emuelsen, UNversity o[ California Mr. Gordon Schanck, University of Calitorats '.f r. Fels Dflngermond ` Sierra Club San Gorgonio Chapter may, Sewing R'nerside ar~d San Rarrurdino Counties w~ Tahquitx Group • Los Sermnos Group `•+• San &r;urdino Mtns. Group • Mojave Group i68 V. Mountain View .4ve., Suite U0 San Bernardino, CA 92401 1"14)3RI-SCIS ~saiution in Suppurl of Cwtpieti;.y the North Etiwanda Specific Plan in *7,•ncho f]swmonga VEfQ~A.S a 5, 6G0 acre area referred to as "The Dbrtlr Etiwanda Specific Plan" falls within the City of Rancho Cucamonga sphern of influence and is proposed for annexation by the CYty; and ldQ•R~_!1u^ the region is home tp an tmusval riparian habitat formed by the impounding of groucd water as well as a peat bog of unique charactor; and WF~II+AS the region is found to 4e a potentially suitable habitat for listed endangeret3 plant species; and 4diFRPAS the Specific Plan is inttn¢siete and envimcmm~tal considerations warrant further study; therefore be. it RE90LVA7 that the San Gorgonio Chapter Sierra c:tuC> urges me aan Be>_Tardim County Boacd of Supervisors to refrain fmn approving development proposed for the area prior to mnpletion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga North Etivranda Specific Plan. Signed. ~ c..~CG~L//Q%U"/C~G~ Steven Halmgnd, gala Fbnnech (for) (hair Jo Harden, Secretary August 2E, 1990 .. Ta explore, enjoy and prcxrve the action i forests, venters, wildlife. and wilderness .. . , ol.. ua TBI inr ,.. 9- , a„ 21 711 :+ GIIY HALL~p 2 Arrmv. Mea7mea, Lmoz, G.urers 8, ~i~raoax •YfOM,M Nr 4W x rr.na+:w 1NRVIW IwtYw o[wnrryul yq0 AYOt1N Orr w IMOO VON N.YIYN. IOYIRN BOON AI[10 u.x rNV[NOe HNt [C [IOUp rLOan IXJIN [. ULIIOIINN .1'IIOiN) ,w AF[n0[,CUIrOnN1n 00MIJlM T[L.INOM[ pW YIVN 'RLOxON[ Olll tW[N .{LfCe11[N NIL O0.[[I[ nLLOON[II IMt W-YM September :., 1390 yM IVIO OTw yY0 4JOL4 vIL 4O[ DII:V[, [YR[ [00 MN OI{OO. WL1r e[N:1 [[111 nu[xe xr u1a xwuu Tu[[ol:e[ uul [[[yN Nrar Lw ry[LU errrcl nul wn.N Nex1w [, .,1NITlIPO ,[ nq,e.LOenxlueel[-w1 N T[~[IX trM1 I[111 .Tg111 Tt L1C011\11 1[I)i .L1[g111 p Y11 I Lt NVU\[1MV' wireu asl-s~a4 1G6mif&[116 in~i 9n-et99 City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk 10500 Civic Center DrSve Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Item N83 - City Co,mM 1 11n.nA. September 5, 1990 Anoesl of Co ditione fe:^ Tract N1.1192 Gentleman: Thie letteY will conlirm my conversation with Jim Mariwsn, City Attorney, that the above-referenced Agenda Item has been removed from toaight'a City Council Agenda. Pleeae acknowledging the farel~oinq by ezecutinq a copy o£ this letter in the apace provided below and returning it to me by telecapy (711/553-835x) immediately Thank you for your cooperetior. very rule yours, L R. Michael Joy RMJ:jm ec: Jselea Markmsa, Baq. Received end acknowledged thla fth day o! Beptgmber, 1990. ~ ~ '~ Title: +. ~'~r~~l .N HIX DFVE~OPMENT CGPP TEL No .'14-592-5010 Rug 31.90 14:56 No.GI~.G~(2~.P .01 ~C Ga, '. H/X QNELOP/~7VT CDRR ~~~~~/~ (~ 437~719I4SG9 846177N0. 2 FAX.• /TI4J 592-,StJ/0 l24 /AOCAQS) FAX 1"RANSIYIISSIONCO f/ER Sf~.~'r' T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Debbic Adaas - City Clerks Offi c. r. J}ob Yoder 8/31/90 AnDCeJ - City Council Meeting 9/5190 COMMENTS: eleaee copy end di stri bu tc to each city council NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS SHEET): ~ ~ IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED MATERIAL, PLEASE CALL US BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE NIX DEVELOPMENT COPE -E'. fJo .714-59 ~-5010 Pug ;'1,90 14:55 Na .002 P.G2 II~~ M[X DEYELOPME , NT t.ORP, August 71, 1990 Members of the city council CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91'730 RE: Agenda Item F - 3, Meeting of September S, 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 Dear Mambere of the City Council: We would like to present to you directly our position with respect to our appeal filed July 6, 1990 regarding Planning commission Resolution No. 90-95. our contention is that certain conditions, as prwiousiy oeiiiacu is •_"e ~~»eal. era being lmpoud on our deveiopmant illegally and unfairly. We have not w.., ~ ~^ •.ti.r 7ece1 basis there is for aasocieting these additional and excessive conditions with our project. We will respond to each item ih the order presented in the staff Report dated Septaml»r 5, 1990t A. ENGINEERING CONDITION NO. 3 - Hallman Avenue Widening Our engginaara have advised us that standard treff is transition lanes inatelled north and south of our tract boundaries along Hallman Avenue aze ell that ie reguirad to meet ell adopted ^afety standerde and codes. B. ENOINSBRING CONDITION NO. 1 - Utilities Undergrounding This condition assumes that the stE:at xidening is warranted and appropriate. Given that, wa object to the oPfsite portions of the sthtad condition. The underggrounding suggested oPfsita of our project na outlined in the staff report is undsretated. Current policy (that ws have received from the Enginserinq Division) states that undargroundinq shall include the entire projaot frontage extending to either the first pole ottslta from the projaot boundaries or a new polo araoteQ et a project boundary. MIX DEVELQPMENT CORP TEL No.'14-592-5010 Pug 31.90 14:55 Nc .002 P.0? Using the letter option the additional offsite undergrounding requ ire~enta total 97l feet compared to the site requirement oP 99o feet. The costs for undergrounding versus relocating on poles is dxacticelly different. The condition as written conflicts with current policy. Any additional offsite undergrounding should be completed at our option - reimbursement options and economies of scale are cohsideratione that should be left for us to decide. ENGINEERING CGNDITION N0. 11 - Mignonette ReCOnstrUCtipn This condition was added to our Qavelopment following technical review of the tentative tract and just prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Wa discovered it upon reading the proposed Resolutions for adoption at that meeting. There was discussion throughout the project approval process as to whether Mignonette should be connected since there was significant neighborhood objection. It was constantly stated by staff and planning commission that this street was elweys intended to go through and connect to future development. Since the street was planned and intandad for future devolcppwant it seams contrary to state our development causes ~~addltional traffic end drainega^. In addition this condition i• loosely worded and the complete extent of work that we could be obligated to perform is unclear. D. ENGINEERING CONDITION N0. g - Amethyst Street Storm Drain Our position on this matter is expressed clearly in our sarlier letter to the City Manager, dated August 14, 1990 (copy included in the Staff Report), however we do WSeh to elaborate on a few points. Tha moat important finding that she study conducted by Norris-Repke, Inc. (copy of narrative anQ table enclosed) dsmonetratea is that the purpose for the storm erein lines we have been conditioned to build is to handle water generated from projects to the north, not our project. Another result of the study ie that the city project being conducted north of 19th Street virtually creates the problem In Amethyst near our project and contlnuing downstream. The staff dismisses this as a temporary condition that will be corrected when the Lemoh Storm Drain is complete. We haw added study C to the summary table (see Tabl• 1, Revised) which refleot• the situation in the street when the Lemon Storm Drain is complete and e• you can see, ell flows in Page a of 7 HIX DEVELOPMENT CORP TEL No .714-592-`010 Aug 31.90 14:56 No .002 P.04 Amethyst at and downstream of our project will be contained wall within the right of wey. our contribution to the existing problem in Amethyst is lass than 1i in all ralevnnt caws. xhe improvements condltionsd do not mast the required laga7, parawetare ee outlined in our appeal dated .TUly 5, 1940. Ai ateted previously, we era prooeadinq with the engineering of our project without addressing the items wa havs eppealed until we an eatistled there i• legal juetitication for Chair impleaentatlon. we will take ~~rlhatever legal action ie necessary to protect our rightis And inaura our project neglne in a timely manner. Pleeee feel free to contact ouc• ottioe directly should you hove any qquestions regarding ttesa ^nttars. Thank you for your coneidaretion. ainc ~y, Bo erf/ General Ma eger Enclosuraa cc: shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Jaok Lam, City Manager Page ~ O! 7 H.X DEUELDPMENT ~~ORF TEL No..14-`92-5010 Aug 31.30 14:56 Na.002 P.OS HYDROLOGY STUDY ANALYSIS OF TENTATIVB TRACT 14192 SMECl ON AM6TMYST AVRNUE July 19, 1990 Rev. AuguaC So, 1990 ~-1 ~ NK]RR18-REPKE, INC. '" ~ ~ ~ ~ HIK DE'JELOFMEMT iORP '6L No.;iJ-592-5010 Rug 3i ~'?0 14:56 No.00J P.~)6 HYDROLOGY STUDY AMETHYST AVBNUB This a±udy was conducted to determine the relative etfoct of the development Of a 22 acre 61te (Tentative Tract 14192) located on the west side o! Methyet Avenue south of 19th Street on the 100 year runoff along Amethyst Avenue. The results of the study ere not intended to precisely represent ectuai 100 yenr runoff for design Purposes but Only to represent the change in runoff due to a chengs in lend ue• and drainage patterns of the proposed Qevelopment alts, The watershed studied consisted of the Amethyst Avenue dreineqg• Brea ae outlihed on the city mestar plan map (Exhibit 1). in geneznl the drainage srea is bounded by Helimen Avenue on the west, Amathyat Avenue on the seat, Beachwood Drive on the North end Baseline Road on the south. The entire Qrainega Brea consists of epproximetely 280 acres. The entire arse ie 85-90 percent developed with single family land use. The study was performed using ail the bees data Prom the original master plan studies nrevfouety ~....~i..t-~ ~;,, ~euusa aitn the city. Theca etuQles node Certain V~~ assumptions for master planning purposeB such ae: 1. improved street sections with curb to curb to compute travel times. 2. All eingle tamily (3-4 dwelling's per acre) land uss in the watershed. 3. Drainage arse boundary assumptions in some cease. other hydrology model information carried over Prom the master plan studlea wne~ 1. Intensity Duratioh Curve slope ~ 0.60 2. 1-hour 300 year intensity •+ 1.54" 'S'j~Cidala.ii"r s Two eeparete hydrologic scenarios wore modeled. study A represents drainage conditions prior to drsinagga feoility and street improvement conmtruotion presently in progress on Amethyst Avenue north of 19th street an 19th street west of Amathyat. study B represents conditions after these improvements are in place. 1 HIX DEVELOPMENT COkP TEL No.i14-592-5010 Aug 31 90 14:56 No .002 P.07 under oonditoon A, it le our underatendinq, based on previous neater plnn studies and disouesions with city staff, that street flows on Amethyst Avenue at Node S20 were directed to the nest into an open channel end proceeded to the •outheeet end Arohibsld Avenue (sea exhibit 2). study D (see Sxhibit 4) represents conditions after completion of the nester plan systems from Node 530 to 60 which ere presently under construction end assumes the street flow on Anathyst Avenue not pinked up by this system will continue south on Arethyst Avenue. This will be the cas• until construction of the Leeson Avenue storm Qrnin, which will cut off a subetentl'al amount of street flox et Node 50. Study 9aleo asaunes the 19th 8tteet proieot west of Amethyst Avenue, which will direct nil runoff north of 19th street to the master plan system et Node S]0, le in place. For each of the two models eesoribed above, hydrology atudiec were conduotad with the proposed Tentative Tract 14192 dreinnge area land use in the undeveloped (Natural Poor Cover) condition and Qeveloped (3-4 single family unite per sore) condition. The proposed development drainage Brea wss modeled to conform in general with the flow patterns presented in a Drainage Report pprepazeQ for Tentative Tract 14192 by Loran Phillips i Associates dated 6/22/90. one could correctly argue that the assumptions and methods used alaplity the hydrology modal for the arcs with regard to actual conditions. However. wa believe Chet this nethod 1^ sutfialent to show the relative, order of magnitude, •f tact of a changed condition while ail other fsotore remain constant. Table S presents summary OL the study reeUlte. The quantify (Q) and gutter flow depth (d) et the end o1 sash atraet flow reach along Amythest is presented. The numbers presented represent quentlties and depths at the node location prior to the addition of subarea flow or oontluencinq flow at the node. Total peak runofL (p) et several point locations (Nodes) is also presented. Date is presented for the toilowinq conditianes study A s Conditions Drior to naa nectar plan storm dralnc end atraet improvements on Amethyst n/o 19th 9traet Al - Tentative Treat 14192 sroa undeveloped (exhibit 2) A2 ~ Tentative Tract 14192 arse developed (6xhiblt ]) HIa DEVELGPMENT CGRP TEL No .7i4-532-5010 Rug bL 90 14:SE No,002 P.08 Study B ~ conditions ettsr new master plan storm drains and street improvements on Amethyst n/O 19th street end 19th Street without Amethyst. B1 - Tentative Tract 14192 area undeveloped ($Xhibit 4) 62 ~ Tentative Tract 14192 eras developed ($xhlbit 5) Also shown on Table 1 are Celauleted street CDpecitise based on e 44 feel aide attest with en 8 inch curb face within a 66 lest right of way. Exhibits 2,3,4, a S give a graphical reprsaentation of the study Bran, runofR quantities celculete4 end the hydrology celculetione. Beead on the results preaentsd in Table 1 the following obsarvetions eCe medae 1. flow sxoaeds top of curb (0.67 feet) in stuAy A et Mignonette Street anA right of way (0.89 Lest) at Le grende Street. 2. Plow exceeds right of way (0.89 lent )in Study B et north boundary of existing Trset 7769. 3. The increase in flow Aue to development of Tentative Tract 14192 et the south boundary of Tentative Tract 14192 18 11 cfa (6.9t) in Study A and 10 ate (2.8t) in study B. a. Ths inarsess in flow due to development oL Tsntetive ' Tract 1A 192 et the SDRR treota is 13 cfa (4.2t) Sil study A ebd 20 ets (4.1i) Sn study B. 7. in Studyy A flow depths and quantities are lase than or vary slightly over right of way depth end cepacitisa throughout the study length. 6. upon impliwsntation of the Lemon Ave, seetsz plan store drain flows in Asathyet will be epproxiseteiy 60 cfa lees then those shown !n Study A and should ba well below atrsat cepeaity st right oP way. it le egein noted theC the results presented ese based an ossumad in!araatlor, end suitable for pienninq or relative evaluation purpose only. Nt1074NYD.9TU 9 HIX DEVELOPMENT COkP TEL No . 714-592-5910 Aug 3i .9G 14 :56 Nu. 002 P.09 P .A A P P P A p O O O O O) U O O N A A P A A P jt p } v V q N P A W W W W i O J O O O O W N O O O N N •• NN nvI TN A'y1/. N AVI NN i{ON i V-~VI On OA OIi O yn O o N OM •OM O VOn H• P ~ S '! 7 .G G Y 7 aI 1 NO'IJ N !- N ~~1-.N r1 NO -N SON N W2N • C• bpi d'II ~ ~+AN S ON AIN OPA 5 ON N A -~ .r 'O r H r1 r. A - N e d 1~ 1 N ''• m In A D 47 O JP O S IO W N N 1 W N d b M ( 7[ = O N T 0. ~ }1 N }I n •[ ~ O a' Yr N l Y Y N 1 ~ " 't ~ N .ti N G ~ +• N-•~N f ~S Oln N NO ~C m0 10 N yo S WO 0. 0 N d O O O O( O. ( N( y( p O( ~ Y f1 m o ~• ro 1 -! 7 1 N I N i d e 1 O 47 N O d HN y k- N2 n VY 1 a w O N'!1 Y NN 7 m -I . O III ... • NO t[ 0.b O -. d N A 6 K C w y IO 01 7 Y M A O 7 • t N 7 m I'1 A 1 O W N -1 1 T Ad[ O k O.s w N O S TO ~ q N N .C'. l W wn 7 A N T O,G 11 ~• S ~! W N P• N O V • N N -~• N d N O O w tt V JO NNF A Ae ti b A O1 N r• N p ++• K N N W O O N :.• n o +. < A O Y Oq 00 DO OD D OA OD OG D 00 M r M C H w a c n ..... A N YI TYM O+ O O s~ -w o 0 0 0 0 0 N N N + W w. ~ M ~ H rvcn VO IOm mW mV YI YN Ol0 D qW i yl e1 O~ ON 00 OA NVI IP wI- IOA A WW 1'^ m d ~ YIN P PAK tr [ N T fI ( O O O o O O o O ~• N O W N N r w H w rye[ bN bb mP mW v Vv VW mb m oIv an NN NW OaI Atn O q0 AV Vm b wW N "1 W 1 N ~• a w7ry 5bS w r 6 r O O O A N • A • a . A • W W • W ~ ., • W W ,dN OIO Nat ION Oat OI .ON IpO O bm H ON OV mW mIa W mN O\V V OOI d l") ~~S dN N r.' V. A A W W W • N ww 1~m bW H•V N ON OP tD0 O IOW W 0 ~ ON NU Ov OIO W OW 41-. COW W OVI N 0. NN • ro O H N w w F+ N w 1..• N 0. O~ A V w p W W A H• O W W ~ V O N N O fl -F \(•I n ~ O b w m W b q N ~ P iT O D ' W N N W N O !J b ~ V . H?X DEVELOPMEidT I.ORP ?EL No.714-59?-5010 Rug 31.90 1456 No .002 P.10 J P N i y W W N I z O O O w m H O W O J J Y P O A W W O P ~ po 0 0 pp ~ q W o m N g o aM M„ .T ^ a A ~ 'Y4 ~~~ o F S m~ N~ S g~ 0 ~~$ ~g F s2 ~ ~8w a ~j ~ V m a O~ p^~ r {{Q1~a .1 ~ I I p I ~1 I pqP as ~ '.yO! ^ < ~ • O 11 ^ H V 1/ ~ p ~ 'iH~ ~~1 y Ip~I ft 'J P R P <i ~ T e a Y ~ I~mt ~ tylnnl ~ J A !nm II O h ~ A :t b ~ ~ ~ N N tar ~ ^ ~ W a f~ ~m s ~ e m~n bb pA OD db 4 °q 00 dlo P Oq ~ w ii ~Q{, nE i ft O W O N m~m N ~ V V ~ Y ~ M O Vpp Y ~ H ~ ~ Ot°0 00 O~ N ~ b NM 1POP bP - W W t ~ ~ LLL / m ~"' O ~ O W O N O N O Y N O O O O r` H N H trl d ! N N N W O F P N O N O P N J N W Y W/ rl M C A W 1 M ~ a tq t1 O W N P ~oN ON N bN .pp bC (.~ ~ pNp ~ Y O > m N O +i m W m b W m m N V N J J O m 1 e 1 0 b m M h~ Y Y m O W M J J pM J p P eD O p ~yO m~ RI t1 G N N N O J O b W O W p r" P W W O N N A d C N N Y Y ~~pp A b O P U b u 4 G O U~ N rl ~ F rl IV N V INS Y M 1OgS~ N W T U O O J b b W fr M Y M N H p I^ fn a V I+ M 1+ y O O W W J J O N N (~ (I1~ 0 F A 4 M m • W 1p q A ~~ ~~ m N W W N C fJ SOUTHWEST ~/ DESIGN GROUP ! INUTED ~~~ F I August 31, 1990 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Attention: Jerry Guarracino, Planning Division Dear Jerry; -RECEIVED- cmroFwwctbar~wa~c. ~ AUG ~I~ ~t~i1~2rUr4,s~ RE: 20 Apartments Sierra Madre Avenue -Rancho Cucamonga, CA Design Review f~88-03 APN 207-251-22 This letter is to request our item removed from the City Council meeting o£ September 5, 1990. It is the opinion of the property owners, Sun-Rav Entern_rianu ~.. Ccwvro oils appeal for personal reasons. If you have any questions or require additional information, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, SOUTH'i/EST DESIGN GROUP LTD. [~ Alan E. Smith Aht! {RCHIBALD A%'fNUE, SUITE !O7 • RANCHO CUC,{AIONCA, CALIFORNIA 41'411 (E L. X7141 9B7J!41 • FA%~ Jt~l 944E!01 Publ is Safety Comniseion Minutes -a- ,IUne 5, 1990 D3. Police o P t Pr De t P kind Entoteement. Chairman Boyd stated that since Commieaionet Quintana had 6rcught up thin issue and she was unable to attend tonight, he would like to continue this item to the ,]uly meeting. Chairman Boytl asked it there were any mamba ra of the public present for this item. There was nc response. Chairman Boyd stated the recommendation was to conduct a study on the legality, fens ibility and effectiveness of the Police Department enforcing permit parking v iolationa on public school grounds. Be stated he would like to sea an additic nai recommendation that eat abliahee the policy whnreby the City could have the School Diairict enforce their own parking on school grounds instead of using City Police personnel. ACTION: Ltem continued to the Su ly 3, 1990 meeting. . . . . w E COMMUNI GTIONS PROM THE P IC E1. Cathy Stanford stated it was very hard to access San 9ernardino Road from orangewood because of the cloaenaes of parked Gaza to [ha intersection. She asked if there wav a way to extend the no parking area by the intersection. ."___c..C _c,_ 1]..__ ..._ C.:y 1.,--. L•y Depa. ~~~ie,u w iuvenc ayace cne eacua«on. . . t e . . p anVERTI36D PC~TTr weaazwnv F1, REYIEW OF P chairman Boyd presented the background information on ehie item at the Council and Commission level. Staff report presented by Chief Michael, Fizv District, with anaiatanee by Jerzy Grant, Building Ott is lal, ^ivi•ion Chief Almond, Fira Diairict, and Craig Fox, AaeletanC City Attorney. _••...rc,aa Do yd aa,.a - e yropoeed change on page te, sect ion 3-6, t0 delete the exception that a~local~weter floe alarm wa• not needed if you had a smoke detector. Me asked what wan the purponn of the water Elow alarm. D ivieion ch let Almond, Flrn Dlattict, aiatnd as tM ordirancw wan developed, a committee wee formed made up of people Prom ihs Building end Safety Dtvis ion, the Ftze 9a Lty Division, and the building induct ry, and rtatvd one of [he menibera o[ that committee wan present to addreu their quest ionn. Public Safety Commiae ion Agenda -5- June 5, 1990 Tim Fejeran, Pi re Prevention Specialist, Biated the purpcae of the water flow alarm was to act as an evacuation device and a back-up to tN smoke detector system, and to alert the neighbors if the owners were net home. Chairman Boyd aeketl why the alarm was to be located on the outs ids of the hoc ae, and if since moat homes have the master betlzoom in the back, wculdn't rhea keep the neighbors from hearing the alarm. TLn Fejetan, File Ptevent ion Specialist, etaCed in NFPA 13D and 13R, under 3-6, the an_nendix states the audable device ehaL be henrd wit.*. all bedrec~ da:a cbead and in all bedrooms of the Douse, so it was placed on the outside master bedroom wall to be hoard by bath inside and outs ids of the dwelling. Ha stated moot tracts are built back-to-back and would probably echo throughout the area. He eta^_ed the alarm would be on the master bedroom or other approvatl araan, and each tract would be looked aC on a case-by-case basis when it came through the planning stages. Thera followed a discussion on the Location of the water flow alarm. Chairman Boytl stated on page 29, Share is a proposed deletion of section 4-6, so would that mean eprinklara would be required in bathrooms. Also by deleting section 2, would eprinklara be required in srtiall closets. Tim Fejeran, Fite Prevention Specialist, stated that ie correct. H0 stated they have found that moat bathrocros have combust ibis plumbing tixiutae and combustibles chemicals under the sinks where theta have been incidents of fire atnriing in those locations. Na stated they ware alec rscomnending that eprinklara be installed in amn11 closets because that is moat often the place where small children hide when there is a tire. Commies Sonar Yankovich asked iE there wculd just be one alarm required because acme tee idencee are very large. Tim Fejeran, Fire Prevention Specialist, stated it would depend on the structure, and i£ it manta the nquiraments for audibility He et ated mere may he incidents where two alarms nre required due to the size of the structure. Chairman Boyd opened the meet inq for public hearing. Addressing the Commise ion were: ^on Jackson, William Lyon Company, stated they just race Sped tMLr package on this item and telt tRay did not have enough time to prepare, and asked Che Commission for a continuance of this item. e ill ?uR, BIA, felt the City should have sane a copy of the csport to all builders in Che City as a coureasy as ha did not receive hie copy until today •ither. Rs stated ha would elan feel more comfortable dtscussinq thte Sawa if it could be continwd. Ne then presanUO informer ion regarding fire aprinklen from a study conducted by Johns Hapkin• University end how he Hlt the cost could imp+ce tM homebuyer. Hart in Garrick, Lincoln Propartiu, aLO asked the Commission to continua the matter dw to the lack of time to rev ieW tM etatL report. Public Safety Commies ion Agenda -5- June 5, 1990 Jos Manisco, attosnay for LewL Home e, stated he had no complaints with the contents oL the staff report, but was concerned with the validity of the proposed ordinance. H¢ presented information regarding Che State Attorney General's opinion on municipalities adopting more etrinq¢nt code than the State Fire Narahal, and submitted Lt for inclusion with the minutes. There being no further continent, the public hearing was closed. chairman Boyd instructed the Commission on the following points: The Council hat requested the Commission review the proposed specifications, They specifically did not request the Commission to give them an opinion on whether they approved of the ides oz not. Those arguments that have bean made to the commission are made for the purposes of inserting them into the record. The Coatini salon's iuriadictlon is to decide the issues based on the evidence as it ie heard and the direction given by Che Council. That dirsetion is to review the ordinaneu, and to make uhatevsr changes or modifications or ocher recommendations as the Commies can feels i• approprLaie. The public hen ring will 6e ad~ournad, and if *_here ie further testimony ae to changes oc modifications, it will be considered at that Lima. ACTION: The publLc hearing was continued to June 32, 1990 meeting, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 10500 civic Center Dziva, to allow those present morn time to review the information. • • . . Chairman Bovd catlnd + .. _ __ _,~~ r, w, T . ,,,seeing reconvened at 8:12 p.m. with all members of the commission present (Quintana absent). ~ . : • + w e. C0101IBSj9N B0Sj]~40 - 6EN6IUL 3NMANATION Gl. Aaoort On Faaeibilit~oelBjysth COUrt Proarim to[ Aanr ho CL`Camonaa. !TO Be Contiauedl ACTION: Item continued to Stine 12, 1990. • ~ . + « e G2. Consideration of Ootion• for Crosain Safety Personnel Rthez Than CLOGGinl 4ydi de. ITo 8e (`nn~ib..gw. ACTION: Item continued to June, ,12, 1990. . • • . . s Public Safety commleaion Minutes -3- June 12, 1990 Aon Zeibarth stated that ie a real problem end did not know if they would 6e able to eatiafy evaryone~a needs. Chairman Boyd esked what if she public safety aspects era different between the different types of vehicles, such ae 6eae e, camper abet le and free moving vehicles. Aon Zeibarth felt the Commission needed to consider what 1,200 cii Irene feel, and if a boat is properly 6loeked and stable and not a hazard Eor a child; Cher. the Co, iaaivn ehouid consioer the boat owner•a needs as well ae the recreational vehicle owner's. Chairman Boyd asked about camper shells as a safety hazard to children. He stated Lt was against the law to leave refrigerators stored putside with doors attached, eo wouldn't a camper shell pose the same type of hazard. Aon Zeibarth stated camper ehell• are not Girt Lght eo h¢ dtd not teal it was the same ia¢ue as a zefriyerator. N¢ stet/d if a shell was unsecured from the truck, it should b¢ the reeponaibil ity of the owner to see it is properly secured. They wanted enforcement, but ai.,o felt they had certain right e. There being no further comments, the pudic hearing was cloe/d. chairman Boyd asked EngLnoerinq staff to research the ¢ight line visibility foe vehiele9 parked in the front yard ar¢a wh¢ra it can bnek out onto the street, antl what the recommended set-backs era to seers the vehicle era placed in a safe manner so ae to not block the sidewalks, fire access, etc. uommiaeaonar Glees Stated he would like information on whet percentage of grade ie considered safe for storing vehicles on. commies inner Yankovich stated ha would like tnEormat ion on how to properly secure the tongue of a boat, and how bast to store camper shells. Commieeioner Quintana felt Si would be useful to det ins the epee if is subcategories and the potential hszarde that are specific for eech /ubcetegocy. ACTION: Stott to come back with the above information, antl prs/ant information on ordinance from other cities on the same eubjeet, at the Augu/i 7, 1990 meeting. . . . . . chairman Boyd called a recces at 8:02 p. m. The Commisslon rwonveed at 8:15 p.m with all members o! the Commission present. • a . • . C2. CONTINVATION O£ ADyERTISEp PV BL IC HEARING ON PROPOSED eSIOENTI f £IAE ~pRINKT•ER ORDIN NC£. Chairman Boyd reopened the continued public hearing from June 5, 1990. Addre/LnB the Commleion was: Publie Safety Commiaaion Minutes -4- ,lone 12, 1990 Hill Huh from [ho HIA, 9277 Haven Avenue, who thanked the Cortmiea ion for the opportunity io come back on behalf of Ghe BIA. He atatad he waa concerned with the maintenance requitementa as listed on page 65. He felt moat raaidente would not follow rho ditectiona becauaa they ware too involved. Ho also referred to an artic to Ghat appeared in the Daily Bulletin on June e, 1990 regarding planning fee ehortfalla, and Eelt several builders would not build in the Clty if this waa pee sad. Ho also referred to Cho north Etiwanda asea which ie already paying into a Communities Facility District for fire protection, which i• exponaivo and adding the coat of ree>,dmtlal fire sprinklers woultl ba vary expensive for them. Thera being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Amodt felt the cyatem waa far tiro prevention and would help homeowners during reaponeo time by the Pire Department. He oleo felt if a person could afford a 5300,000.00 home, they woultl want to do something to help protect that home. commieaioner Curatalo orated the arguments presented only address coat. He asked if rho 8IA has ever conaidarad if it can save lives. Hill Auh, BIA, stated that asvoral yoara ago before he was with rho BIA, he worked on a ayatem to provide smoke detaciora to save lives. Commies ionar Curataio fait that amoko detectors would work !or aduite who can flea, but whet about small children. gilt Anh. qTA. at xt ed ha fall fha• ha• Mean 1nn4eA at. Chairman Boyd stated he would like the Commission to consider the exceptions to the ordinance ae outlined on page 61. He stated the proposal made in the staff report on page 69 recommonda ihaG these exceptions be deleted and auhati<ute with "aprinklera may be omitted from attic e, crawlapaeae, and other concealed epacec the[ are not used or intended for living purpoaea". commies ionar Waet was eat lafiod with the answers provided by the Firs District at the previauo meat inq. Commieaionor Yankovlch stated hl• only concern wa• with rho oztorior alarm on the maotor bedroom. chairman Boyd did not foal that aprinklera wore needed in small cloaot• and small h of Frnnma w5fn area-ili=.ebls fl rw~yraa rnA wn~11n ti ~ fn a_<_ Hm~pH nn Nn: 2 Ipfr in, end possibly leave in Exception No. 1 also. Commieaiorer Amodt concurred with Chairman Boyd. .. •~a• commie loner Olau arrival at 7:20 p.m. Public Safety Commission Minutes -6- June 12, 1990 Chairman Boyd then referred to aeet ion 3-fi on page 38, which the Fire District waa recommending be deleted and replaced with "in moat building conf iguratione, the wafer flaw alarm shall be located on an exterior wall of the master bedroom". Commissioner West felt that might work on small dwellings, but was not aura how it would work on a large house. Commissioner Curatalo felt maybe they could require mor+ than, one alar.n if square footage was large. Chief Michael, Fira Dietrici, stated you couie feet ail as many alarm: as ua: fee necessary. He stated the matte[ bedroom would br moat effective because it waa wY.ere adVlts would De nG night when people were Bleeping and could aeeiet with evacuation. Ha stated they would review the models of new tcacte to see how beet Co equip the homes with alarms. Commissioner Curatalo felt they ahou: keep the requirement and add in something that over a certain square footage would have more than one alarm. Tim Fejeran, Fire Prevention Speeialiat, felt the exterior alarm would be for the parents Co help in wacu at inq. Ns et atad it would be hard to detrrmine a particular equnre footage requirement Eor more Chan one alarm bateau the configuration of house various eo much. The epecificattone state the alarm must be audible at night throughout the entire structure with all appliances operating, eo he felt it would be beat to decide at the time the modals are hail[ how many alarms would ba required. chairman Boyd auggented that on page 69, whore it tevieae Section 3-6, to delete the exception and add wording that says "water flow alarm(s) shall bs located _: _- _.._____- ~••" •^ •••^b + innwtior. the[ it ie audible throughout the hcuae as approved by the Pire CDieE." The Comminelon contorted. Chairman Boyd than ra [erred to page 61, Section 2-6, and stated there appeared to be a conneneus t0 lasve in ezceptione 1 and 2, delete except LOne 3 and d and put in their place the exception noted on page 70, "Sprinklare may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces, and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living putposse or etaraga^, and to keep in exception 5 on page 62. MOTioN: Moved by Amodt, seconded by West to direct the City Attorney to develop an ordinance implementing the requirements of 13D and 13R as amended by the Commission, and to send that ordinance to the City Council for adoption. Motion carried unanimously, 6-0-1 (Quintana absent). NOTION: Moved by Weak, seconded by Cu ratelo that the Conmission recoamend to the City council Co sdopt t~,e findinge o[ Eact ae shown on pogo 76 through 80. Motion carried unanimously, 6-0-1 (Quintana abater). • • ~ . . . :~.,. iY CF RANCHO LUCAI}„ JUN O'' _ r f3old~ View Region ''P'A'~pl~~~'w~3r~• 6, June 1990 T0: Jerry Fulwood FROH: Bill P,uh B1A RE: Besldznttal Fire Scrinkl=rs f nave enclosed some of the Information that f punted at last zvznings Public Safety Ccmmtssion meetlna. I Aope that it Groves Informational. RR zs pe cpe a'fyuAlsl I(~~ dll l 9467 Havn Rvnw. SuKe 4E0 • Rands Cucomalgo, CdMOmio 91730 • (714) 945•1E64 • HiX (714) 94A•0631 ' California Building industry `Y1 ~ 1107 ~ 91h STREE i. SUITE 1060 UCRAhtENTO. CA 958 I4 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER ORDINANCE IS NOi JUSTIFIED DASED UPON LIFE SAFETY, PRODERTY PAO iECTION, OR CO57 SAYINGS, Life Safety Association • rhnna IC IGI 111 '711 Ninety percent of the fataiitfes from resfdential ores are related to smoke Inhalation and causes other then direct contact with flame, Sprinkler systems are activated by heat, not smoke (which ton to ins deadly carbon monoxide, etc.). Two-thtrds of fire-related fatalities 1n one- and two-family dwellings are caused by cigarettes Igniting upholstered furniture or bedding. A slow, smoldering fire such as a burning cigarette can easily generate fatal levels of carbon monoxide before enough heat Is generated to activate the sprinkler system. This is why smoke detection (via smoke detectors) is of such paramount importance regarding )f fe safety. In an analytical study conducte4 by Johns Napkins University it was shown that the most prominent life saving feature in a residential sprfnkler system Is the flow alarm, not the water spray. Property Protection The Hopkins University study asserted that choosing sprfnkler systems over smoke detectors would only provide an 18Z increase in estimated property protection at an increase of 20 to 25 times the cost. from inspection of the existing State Fire Marshal data, the Incidents of fire starting within one of the dwelling's rooms and ultimately resulting in me,lor property loss would De a good indication of where the pretence of a sprfnkler system might provide responsible property protection. The California data for 1980 shows this type of incident haDplning only 6.5Z of the time. Actual data is not avail,ble to indicate what oasltive d}fference the pre;enca of a smoke detector or a remote aiarr syttea would have made in thest cases. Even so, the fact remains that the overwhelming maJority of residential fires starting in areas which could be reached by a sprinkler system do not presently result in me,lor property loss. in a nationally conduced study of 33,000 randomly seleced households, it was found that of the 2,643 fires reported, on1Y a1 wen actually ektingulahed by the fire 1 departraent. 1n over 901 of the usas the fire had been put out by a houfehold :, f ,y'. ~ ~~ __ member. This is not to detract from the Importance of locos fire departments but, rather, it 1s an Indication that the Inter) ection of resl dents al fire sprlnk lers Into common use would only margi noisy Improve fire suppression over this record. Gott SsW ngt Data from the State FT re fkrshal for 1983 shove a total property loss of SI21 million rcsulting from fires in one- and two-family dwellings. There was also a total content lass of f~0 m1111an from theta same fires for a combined loss of fi67 million. puestton: Nhat would be the total cost to instal) fire sprinkler systems in all new residential dwellings far the period of one years Answer: 200,000 unlit z (1,500 per unit ~ f300 m1111on So, a very conserwtlve estimate of f300 m1111on for insUllatton 1n new units each year would be required /n order to diminish a property loss of fi67 m111fon each year. The cost of Installation is double that of the lost::: c ' h•.M ~~^• ~ .. , .Y:. .I i ,y* 'd ~ lr.w. Sprinkler study Owners t+esist d(~dltlOf)d~ COSTS .~aaMra ~ y 1~. woW OraCNN ImMp nn aya. hiwa - n dared 1d ~pplpyflWNlr f2,000-y1 Oarcara raappryyd pbY wand nal b WMaaad. SUpMylyly, Ihal aarDw MCraaaaA b 73 prawn br ayadiad pgdhd MCM. wldl r low+raur eat anrdurrYrYlar~. May Olaaton, 19yf; Carerwnw MI. Nda Shiny co-dlalr, aaM. "Nees wrMN9 6~ ~PrM~~~urw airi- ~n w yes mu~l, a yn raludwba b aNrbulapa b RKa awwnvyy r aY Mp~a„awwrp b dN maa ayordapa r.dwy aoaw lyp..- Garwnly b Ma t Ib year, yr. CaF W tlw BiMr9 Indwky Coach hen byarvawl with maa Than t,ppp MbIVIdMa who hare qa• cNaad new nonwa In pn!ga. San ~~ iwnm awr Uago colrrMlaa. lyw wawywr wn• "°° "'d carnd~ wa~raga d mow harril. ynlr 9 PaF IarA, praarrad o0frtrMawy arrlwl4 Iaa, and aaanw rid blwbr Isahar. iwphatlryy aghry-yip d yN 1,OOp harpllyyr MywYawy wan oardlrclad b Qwpa Caurq' nw rwanr a yes iwy Casunrw warww M Aanlwyn pyndl b N~ wrrt6w r ya,Fdly 9yaywra HpN b raamn 9aw}r, i~ Uflg'illal 1-'IJGr liUallij/ ~dMq b ,blur NMhwa, yo,,. armyMal Marta Mracbr br yu Q'- AaaOtlNbn. naW hares w• Ihs Darr Nkaly b M a1ENd b Nraa. `'fN. a~W~ ~~b lnMMq elaCk ~`~ ~ Yaan dd. b addlbn, rw•homrr ~mnayucnon amarMly ManudaMa'iid~ ooN~Cri'~ af«y maawaaa rrdr r wrgka dwadora, Maway w/pwrwly arb y,~,a,~,a ,aMrq rr~MnW," Y~Nlrara aab. AddMorrry, tln IrbrlwrY daaa whwa ayrMndwa w wrrrne a n0lnrad by UNbrm 9rYgr4 CoMf r.dop.d ey y. bam.yalr can. lAOa d BWldrq OMidaa.^ BWpcq Praaldwy fbn Stlwnl, ~ MrgwlwM fd bwl Magad oyblala and aby b hwd aniwarr Mmwy and rof blppu Cale Mio.wn~.~ a. o~M b IqM a .ir..dy hip, ah41q aab. lMwn arwariwa d- n1aM taMrwar a uN amwwy I'm ownlewy y^ mrlsl daa ww ra. MJwrd yprppyMy. Fol maa knanua0ll, caa 5~7~ 9yap. ~jaw:k.1~~ /G,~~ S^•I'I 11;..1 L ~.. ~1i, r.~l.~.; I- l~ ~. ~,~, ~~ ~ /~i'J ~~ c •~ O ~~~ ~~ ~~ <~ s ~; ~ a ~ 9 i~~ ~ .. Q4~ Q? 1p ~~ ~E g :~ '~ Via. California Building Industry Association CB~A 1107.9th STREET, SUITE 1060 • SACRAhIENTp, [A 95810 • Phpnr Inil,l.Id1'"II PROPOSED RES IUEN7IAL SPRINKLER ORDINANCE IS NOT PERMITTED BY STATE LAN Health and Safety Code sections 17958, 17958.5 and 17958.7 prohibit the adoption and enforcement of the proposed ordinance, Specifically: Section 17958 allows any city or county to make changes to the State Buildf ng Code only 1f they lnpose the same requf remen is as are contained 1n the State Code. Section 11958.4 allows a city or county to make Changes to the State Building Code which are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geoloalcal nr Lr.n..n.";M~c~'. :,.,,.,, L;~„s, Generally acceptable "local conditions" are corrosion and unstable soils, high wind areas, earthquake fault zones, snow and flood zones, and Ilanmable vegeta Uon areas. Interior space of residential bull dings are similar throughout California and are not reasonably related to "local condltlons". Section 1)958.7 requires the governing Doily of a city or county to make an express findine that a change to the State 8uflding Code is reasonably necessary because of "local condltlons", to make that finding a public record, and to file that finding and the proposed aahtndeent with the State Oepartalent o/ Housing and Coeawnlty 8erelop- aKnt. Ho elodlHutlons shall become dfecttve or operative until the Hnding and aerndeent have Deen tiled. k: 'r . .: ~"i n. ,:~. ~i Ii1111.IJ1~rICr: t::.ilJl: ~il:~'1~~I.1: i i 1:1? n «~>,»~ ~~,~, , ~ 1603 ORRINGION AVENUE, EVANSiON, IUINgS 60201 SPRINKLER PUBLICATION "FLABBERGASTED" BY SERIES OF CONTROL VALVE SHUTDOWNS It is roaaeuAng ro sae that IM U.S FIRE SPRINKLER REPORTER has fi• nefiy came b retllze that mere aro cbeed apdnkNr vehea nA there. In ra cent edkiorro. June 1987 and July 1987, they nave pfinMd enk'1s! which point ro Chia prabMm and attle thtl They are "9abhergastad M the recent 9edn of fires in s(mnklered buildirga where the mein sprinkNr carnrol vtly had mean shut down rendering the apnnkbr ays• r•,•• •r•••.• ;~a.;mi m ii n were r a new reveltlion. BUt, 9t+aas whtl9 TMs problem has sxieted AN ysan. TM Innel posed by claed sprinkbr vahea hae bean recognized W the in- lurence induahy kx a long lime. Whtl dher possihN sxplantlron could there De b Ms last thtl fire inaurora inepecl lpdnkkr systems as a pan d the fokow• W aekay end bse prevention program! for Their dlerxa. Thi! indutlry nee bn9 reaognixed the pdenfitl br dilaater that asitle wan the "abeadvalve syndrome..' to t982. Feckxy Mutual published m their perbdictl, FACTORY MUTUAL RECOR0. an alarming stay in which it ~~ wee rr~ytad that tit.^.r2 ,Ian i3,u'W im• prapapy ckMad vawa were dacovered eG during in•planl inapectbna belwan `O ~~ 1973 and 7981. ~urmg Intl lame parbd ~ IMn wan 3801ka tl FM Insured htaili• I O~ ties whero v~lvn ware cbsad, rauklrp in k)aaae in a~ d 1110 miNbn. A rdkrw-tq arlfde a'ppaarkq in a lanr adF lion d Mis earns magutne assns Intl . apkrkNn eftouw not De tM eda roans d Nmaktq srven fin damage. TM problartl b uawMy axe d human eNmaM; a apdnkNraytlsm may W snot oM and kNgdMn.•, (aerpMase) a i a~~. i~~ ~C~~~i~T'~a3~3;~ ~. '~~ ~~Iya ~' ~ ~a ~~~~~B~~y~~~33R ~~~~~~g~ ~a~~Ig~sl'Q ~~~i?~is r$ ~~;' 3'y~ 2;~~;i zfrA ~~ Z£'~~ ~:~~~_~~ __ ~~_-- ~~;~,~, a :~'`~'~ ~ _-Y~'~~ = 3 •~ =ia~s i n'_3i ~~ ~ ~;a~a1 Y~`~;r3 ~~ i 7~ ~ N.7+ ~ !i ~7'?';$ ~ ' I A C 9x'~+?z, q'flr~ S ~~ 7 z 9 Yn q~:~ _ ;4 R ~ ~_ ~~; E[o~ ~i~~n ~f 4~ ~ s ~. C ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ;+~ ~ o C~ ~~ ~ [~~~a^j ~• Aide {~Jj~ `~ ~1 ~~ ~~ - 5 ~ _ ~ 1 r - ~..~ i ~'-`3= .~:,~ '2 Iicqucs',cd by: STATE FIRE MARSHAL Opinion by: JOFIN K. VAR DE KAhff'. Anomey Genus! Ronald M. Weiskopf. Deputy T'r`t HONORABLE IA h1E.i F. MCMULLEN, STATE F.RE MAR- SHAL, hu rcquesttd an opinion on Ne fo0owino qucsdons: i. Under swuau :792: 17958.5 mC 774:8.7 tf;."~ Stare :'.^usi:.g'aw, may shies and Counties adopt building i[andaNs rdating to fire and panic satcty that arc mom strngem Than the state standards adopteA by the Slate Fire ,Ylarthal? 2. May a fire protection distritt adopt a fire prevention code or rcgulauons setting (onh building standards mlaing to fim and paniesafuy that am stricter than those comainEd in Ute Sute Building StartdaMs Code? COFCLUSIONS ~.. Original Poor Qua~rty 1"o0/1B1 P"'17n^vE£ C,T~'_'~Fi,L'S GFII;IQ;S Opinion No. 88~40k-Stpiember 14,1454 W 1. Clues and Counties may not adopt building standuds relating to fin: ^.d panic safety [has are mor_ stringent then Nose adopted by she Sntt Frt Marshal undersecvotu 17922, 11958.5 or 1795S.7 of the S[ase Housing Law. 2. Afirepro[txriondistriumaynotadoptafin:prcventioncodeorothv rcgWadons Nat set fonh btnlding sandards relating [o fire and panic tzfety which are ssriaer than Ne standards con[aincd in Ne Stare Building Standards Cede. ANALYSIS The funttion of Ne OfOce of the State Fire Marshal is ro promote and develop ways arM means o! pro:econg life and prapeny against fire and panic. (11ea1N @. Saf. Code, § 13IOO.I.)' Toward Nat end several secuoas of dq Hea1N and Safety Code dircc[ the Fire Marshal to prepare and adopt building standards relating [o finain azpCCts of fire prevention and !or the pmtttdon of li k and progeny agairta fire and panic in various ategories o! swrntrcs e!'roughout the sure. (Set ag.. §§ 13108 (sate-owned buildings and institu• tionsJ, 13143 (Certain types of occupancies such as jails; hospi W s, rturxriu, schools, Nesters, and auditonumsJ. 13 i43.d (occupances for semirvstodial care]: 1321 I (high riseswetutesl,17920.7 [swaural fire safvyandfirc-resis- tant exits in multiple sorry swuures lu for human habisarion), 17921(6) (hotels, monk, lodging houses, aparvnont boasts, dwtll6ngs, buildings, and accessory strvcotrts)J Shea building andaNS are submitted m the Sate °uiidingSrandards Camrrsisaian far anprrn.ai nnderQ!e $D!t BI!ilditgSSL^.^_- ards Law (div. 13, pL 23, § 18901 :t seq.l and arc Nen published in the Sate Building Standards Cade (Tit. 24. Code C~. RegsJ. (§¢ 18907, 18930,18938, 199x0.18942,18943; 640ps,Cal.Any.Gcn.260,261(1986): cf..~ t8902Jr Two of the sections pursuant ro which Ne State Firc Marshal adopts building s!' ndaMs, sections 17930.7 and 1792 t fb), appear in the Su1e Housing law (HCalth 1 Saf Codc, div, 13, pl. L5, 4 17910 Ct seq. ). SCttions 17922, Ilninnin«I uu,uq nh,.ra, Gn;u Ne IIu;A ma 5 •,Y Cnee ] ihGtµ,ArWna~rsr nJy pgnO<E qn Ll nlanrcren~~cbu¢a.Jdmr S:mNNdoY,uw SmG OuJMI Cetr, w 7:N. U d the GiJmm~ nam~,,,.ne,. Cot: e,d',n:n w -C.!J~~• a..Gnl u',I,N: CNC" (Ilia:. GaM4 W '..uu I]G<. U. 11]., ( I'1C.'. I 1 Inru~wn .I ~<P:o:. (,an uw••nML..Ymn,e!enoJ,xf,N•G, •.m'S.ne n,Ae. i.,aunu,:: C:ee" ems,'. A.n..r~,.e n.ro~: -~:r-----.~:~ __.- .__ -~_ -- ~ ~nriginal Poor Qualif'~ -- - ~- -- -~ I 1 r-- 162 A^OR`KGYGLI'F.R,LL'SOF.'Si0N5 vobme l2 17918.5 and 17918.7 of that Law permit local agrncics to modify certain sate building standaNS to accommouate certain local conditions. We am speeifi• catly asked whether under (hose particular uetions, cities and counties, and also fire protection dtslricts. may adopt t+uilding standards which arc more suingent than d10u adopted by Ne Fre Marsh9. We conclude that under the ' specified codeseaiotls,neithereitiesandcound:s,norfireprotectlondisMcts. may adop[ buudtng standards more stringent Nan Nou of the Stue Frc Marsh9! To be clew u Na outset, Nis opinion is speeit'ically corlcemed wiN the authoriryotlocalagencies to adoptmore ndngentAandardithan thoseadopted by Ne Stale Fre Matsl+al undo Nc throe particvlu sections of the Stue Housing law we ara asked abtw[. Because of alas spedfic focus we do not address oNer provisions of law dot permis tool agtrlclea to adopt local building sandaMs Nat dcviuc from stale building standards adoprcd by Ne State Fite Marshal. and which may permit Nero to adopt stricter building standards Nan those Hereunder. (See e.g., §§ ]3216, 17911(d), 17920.7; cf., Sg Ops.GI.A[ty.Gen, 13 (1975).) 1. Cities and Counties Adooting Building Standards Reluin¢Tn Fre and Panic Safety Undu Sectiorys 17922. 17918. 17918.1 and 17918.7 of [rte State Housing Caw Thu Arc Afore Strineent Than The Sate fir ti, Marshal's Standards. Undersection 7 ofarode XI oftheCalifomiaConstitution, adryorcoun[y "may make... wittlin itsBmits all local. police, sanitary, and odor onlinances ^" " .rrv: w• wruiia wiul general awS." (Cal. CAnf4 an. Xl, § 7J A local otdirulna whitdl is intended to protect NL public healN, safety and wclfarc. such as one prescribing building sgndaMs «ladng to fire safety, would tall within Nat amble (38 Ops.Cal.Atry.Gen, t 3, 14, supra; d.. People ea rc1. Daukme/tan v, CounryolMendotino (1984) 36 Cat.3d 476, 484; People .'. Mueller ((9717) B Cal.App.3d 949, 934 tn. t J The otdlnana would be presumed valid W long aS it did tto[ conflict wiN geneal. i.a, slue laN~. (CY., freeman v, Carus Corra Losrnry Waro Dutricr (1971) 18 Ca1.App.3d 404, 408; Sranislaua Co. em. As3n. v. Sranislaus (1937) 8 CaL2d 378, 353, 38a,) But local leglsladon Nat does wnflict N~IN sarc taw is void. Af our Supreme Court hu summarized: ""'AS defined by the cases Ne consUtudonal phnsc 'cettflin wittl general laws' ... may arse in several difFeteat ways. ]t may grow not o' Ne ezac: lankvape df Ne wale arsd mu.^.::ipy la'-s ~ W wag aw a•ka1 wMNV • rva gwwm C:nria onu11 aaeP aeea;y •unNnY Mauna v+ nrt led pole WuY a,•1+asmaw,wne•in a,an NaM (e,e,d in • oy a'aenry mac. lag a•p•a er Ne ucond gwn,4i it Mdandmoa M wrawelmh,•awriuu•M m,nuam•Yna •dnp WadinlrynynU n4una w nrt •na Mrd• •af•ry IMI •n men wu,{an Na, Nae •dgwee q uM flog Fn Mu•aal, •M A•: fin pgamm G•u¢u mq na ao w a0v. ~.r ~• .eE. CE:. ___ _ __ _~ ._ __ _~ '©riginal Poor Qu~Gt~ ~.. 5<lvcmhr l'.a9 n7T0i.\75Y GE~'CItAI'tOT70~C Is) [nwlipnsl or irem a local mumot'to imM<e additional recuircmems m a f¢la that is preempted by een:ral law' Ritation5i or Crom thethe sta!e's adpptipn nf' a ¢eneral scheme for the n.RUlaUOn of a particular r.:hlea' [ciwtions)~Bnran v. Gry vfCOS Angeles (1970) 2 Ca1.3d 535, 541 [emphasis added(; see also Pcap[e ez rN OcuL• nejlan v. ' Cvunry of nfendacino, Supra, 3G Cal.3d at 454-485; lcncaster v, Municipal Court (1972) 6 Cal.3d 805, $06. 808; S8 Ops.Cal.Any.Gen.5l9, 521"523, 529 (1973); 38 Ops.Cal.Any.Cxn 13. 14, supra.) "Conflict" with state taw can thus arise in many ways, and u peninem herein one of them ocatrs when the scare hu ensued a comprehensive legislaeivc schrme intended for untfortn applitanon throughout the state and a local ordinance seeks to impou a more stringent requirement ro govern a particular facet of the area. In such a cue, the local ordinance woWd be "to that ezten: vpid insofar u it prohibits what (the) scare law authorius. [Citatiotu.j" (,NarAlu v. fusrice's Caurr (1953) 177 Ca1.App.2d 391, 397; see also, Danvi[k Fare Prorecuon Ditr, v. Duf/eCFinancia[ & Conrrr. Co, (1976) SS Ca1.App.3d 2<l. 249, !n re font (196:) SS Cal.2d 99, 102.103: G I Ops Cil.Atty.Gen 365, 372 (1975):43 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 215, 219 (1964)Jr The State Housingl.awpresendycorutimtrs alegisladve design to secure uniform building snndards utiroughour dlc stare and to prrempt local divergem ~' cs dtereCrom, except as specifically au0orized by it. Priorw 1970, the State Housing Law, although detlitcd and comprchcnsive, had not preempted the field of bwldine safev standuds becaese it soepificaiiv emoowercd cities and cn^nties ro enact builCing regulations imposing standards Wt worn "equal to er greater" than those promWgated t+y the start (former § 17951; Smts. 1961, cn. 1844, p. 3922, § $), and it made du state standards inapplicable in thou local jurisdictions which did so (fprtner §§ 19625 [Scars. 1961, ch. 1644, p. 3926, 4 1 L 19$26 [id., § 12, p.39271). (See, G.y ojeahcrr,9cG(v. Mt(l[r (1966) 61 Ca!.2d 93, 100-101; see Danville Firc Prv:croon Uis:. v. Duffel Financial Coasre Co., tupra. 5$ Ca1.App.3d 241. 245; Pcep!e v. B'hee(er (1973) 30 CaLApp3d 26Z, 289; Baum Efecrric Co. v, Ctry of Huruingmr. Beach (1975) 33 CaLApp.3d 373.577.) ~ Unau anvSa JQ Haan S. rvEdinrim(aidOrt C".fomir C.~wwum,r bel a„linannd• cMner cryve !d rupmew /marl wu kw xidr nq<a,o"nuniapJ ufun.' (FUMrv.Cui aJ4r4hr (1916) T Gl.id Na, 7M; 0atan; v. Guu (Iat3) ]3 Gl,ld RLIlS476.) aw V J,a nlJran mawr or r b d 4n lynk4on h•r bnn rely «cup,W h Un <uu. N<rt Ir m mom /« auppl~«nury or wmplimmurykliriwm,svm.f N. wSjaw n whrr+uaona pmpalY muulviudu a'murcapYJhv.' u ... .. v...:....rr..... .. cyan. om,. ,,..-..-, ~-, e._. ._~ A Cavv G,uury,ll Gl .np.ld 2c1, 1.9. "whN<'h;R duramwon of xha rmr4ww •am mucc,pl r(trir it dim a deli„W14wrdan' kiud«I, Yu wuru Iwt w Na pronrio : d d,a c<Miam1 um anwawJiuddnna rmxuret'wuxidecmwm'tcwdmrl Vre, JruuabWOCeuoIlml rtludlen d Ys Guw pra:nm. (Gv ..m i' (60 Dal CaLAny Cm. 20]306 n916)) tTe Mot of hr•v.e unirolm wuxiM hu,ldma r+ndr.tr ra7uinlw(n c:d Wmc rainy scald ha amour d'auxide cRC :~' r51 Ck, GI Auy Gm I ]. rr+n, d. S..o 19':. cn. i :7n, p 11 h, ] ) •i:e-S4C-:i... C2:+ -.- - 4 ~ • '~ri~ina) Paor Ouali±y - -~ ;di ATTOR\'F.Y nEn'fR AI:SOPPi0\'d VdameR in t970, however, the Legislature substami ally amended the State Hous- ing Law in order to provide a compmhensive scheme m secure a general uni Connity oCbuitding standards ufrougn0ut Ne state in manors such as safety and structure of buildings, detaik n( conswction, use of materials, and e.!eariW, plumt.7g and heating specifications. ($talS. 1970, ch. 1436. § 7, p. ' 2ibb; Green v. Superior Court (1974j i0 Cai.3d bib, b2 i; Darvitk Fire Proration Dut, v. DuJJtI Finanria! & Cartttr. Co., supra, 58 GLApp.3d at 245.247, 248; Bdum Ekcrrie Co v. Ciry oJHunrington Beach, rupra, 33 Cal.App.3d 573, 564; Tatchna v. Ciry Council (oJLaguna Beach) (1973) 31 Cat.App.3d 48, 60; 60 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 234, 237-239 (1977); 55. Ops.Cal.Arty.Gen. 157,160 (1972): 54 Ops.GLAny.GC L 87.88-89 (197 p.p k (i) dircctcA the State Deparanent of Housing and Community Development [d adopt nilet and egulauons imposing "the same rcquircmew" that are ~ntained in various uniform indus[ry building codes (Sots. 1970, c17. 1436, § 1, p. 2785, amending ¢ 17922, subd. (a)), and that ;ii) it removed the aforcmmtioneA auNOrity oTcides and countiu to adoptmore tuingentbu0d• ing standards than those imposed by the stau (and the companion provision r.7 akinelhe less stringen? stave standards i;.appliable Nose laaljurisdiaions which did so), and required instead Ufatevery city aM county adoptoMinances or regulations imposing those same requirements wittun theirjurisdicdans wi W n one y'tar, or4ley wcu11 be made applioable in dlsm at that t4-ns by forte `. oflaw (td.43, p. 2786, adding§17958). (See, Danville Fire Protection D$t. v, Duffel Financial & Constr. Co, supra, 56 Cal.App.3d 245: Ptople v. Beach, supra, 33 Ca1.App.3d 573:55 Ops.Gl.Aay.Gen I57, I60, supra; 54 Ops.Cal.Atry.Gen. 87, BS-69, rupra) But even men local jurisdictions wets allowed wide laotude to deviaze from since building stnMards under the State Housing Lew. (See e.g., Daum E:ec+ric Ca. v. Ciry afHun+ingron BeacJ7, tuprc; Peaplev. Whttltr, taprq SS wLmil umpld Ee l9NYnendnua.uma4uu Xauini AgJM tgW.mn bduVdtlIM VD u,~formnY Nradm Jwutruv ur Suu... Iwul n nuuerrtmuwpa im.nn uM ammn Yna uwaWd ndYnaD,rmtmW WiAYYN Ar dnarq `rpn•'rV w/intamwuaim uldlury YkiYpDfuamn" rn! ~u /ud •unifrmky (umldl tr rchiwN •7Jnn r (rmrwaa a+lanl ruvomy, lry nG •wint Iml dDnrlnmar n bnP rhr,in mdunt modJnum/ in lurl mdn bua m diaYm,Jm w knl mdl- uonr...:' (SUU. 19r4 rA rU0./Wn; aYn.J4 fin Prurrwn OW •. D,pr(Fdwe4l~Cwurr.tS, ryn,St GlApr.N Ur, 7rs; Neprn u•Mr/n+197a)70 Gr.App.Id eat, K9: buw Efrws Ct... CnyyNnntintmnarW,ryra, 77 GI.App.7d 771, 517.) IndJOp7.WAny0m. Da, MA.w anaad w q+uJU Dulwuan N Ju vnJam radae wr N wempu,Wee aJUfnl tau y,fuudria pYWwm rmr,u,dY,a/nrua m. ,Jfim~y of Jr antiry iMunn. rld.,a 277.E a..0ewiea Aa wAYn.ewJy man w d und.N/ rY%C,nvr • duivml an iunvYr,u. u auii r.W opren rmYaisi rnD e!nDVU.pp,orhrmMJednitn,annwaim,W,niqum and m.uriHr. Ud.,Mnal orDn.r7. r9RY/ pury~me aodcrlyora ,M amlduy{ n/WYim/ nu ,k p,amua d uY puWie auhh rd rfry. W.n FJ.Dne CD Y CYY Cy NYV NtIaI arlrA, 1Y91C. Y SaI J to IIV ~ r,nYyq N VIO rOY,Vd M arl rYK. unJam cadrt mbuJm prdrumJ rpwu, march rdu/:. t wt unmmlmnely.niblkubd r1Y1Mr.Jw'dn9clnnofwuwid..nJrlm um4u/,vauld ~m urn JUl rd. (Qa Op.GLAq.dn. rvprr•, w.Iw Wn.dlr /iu /.DUawn n6:... Dy]rl fwnrul d Cwur• Ce.dpa, 71 GI,Apy.N 2d1. tYi.i ! ~.i t -• ~: yp•'. i-O.y .ems i _ _ e I ~ Y)ris~inal Poor Ou~!it'~ Sgxemtir lVM AI"rOANGY GF.XERnI'S OPPi0~3 Ii5 Ups.Cal,Any.Gen. 157, 160, rupru; 34 Ops.Cal.Any.Gen. R7, S8 (197gJ" This isbecaum while the 1970amendment5 to the Law wcredesi8ned to secure a uniformity of codes throughout me State, the Legislatu2 showed a "sen- sitivity tn, and deference for, local conditions and needs." (36 Ops.Cal.Aly.Gen. 137, 160, rupru, quoted in Baum Electric Co. v. City aJ Huntington Brach, rupru at 584,) Forexamplq the lawuantendcd prvvidul that a county or city could make such changes or madifcatidns in the state requirements "as it deWrmines art rasonabty necessary beeauu of local wnditiotts" (§ 179385, added by Salts. 1970, eh 7436, § 4, p. 2786), and it also provided d5at the State Housing Law was not moot to almrlocil building mguladons maz had been enacted pnorlo its eRettive date. (§ 17958.7, added by Stars. 1970. ch. 1436, § 3, p. 1436.) In SS Ops.Cil.Atty.Gtn. 157, supra, we concluded tha[ Ne fvrtncr provision demonsvated an intention to allow cities and counties [o adopt regulations witA additional or mart restrictive building standards than those promulgated by Ne sate (id.. at 160.167), and in Sa Ops.CaLAtty.Gen. 87, raps, we said that the latter provision meant that the Law'z requircmen[ (or unifomtity did not apply to building attivity that was allsady reguWt•.d by an existing local 2srlxuon enacted on or before Kovembcr 23.1910 (id., at 88.89). Tlust broad exemptions from statewide buildinC standards no longer ob;am and 5wte prtemption of Ne "ficttl" is mot comple[e. Tn 1950 the Legislamrc (i) amended section 17938.5 otLMe State Housing law ro severely ~"' limnthe types oflocal eonditiomtor which local agencies could devixe lmm statewide building SundaNs (Salts. 1980, ch. 730, p. 303. § 2; Salts. 1950, ch 1235, p. 4203. § 9), and (ii) it delttM tb •.r•~•~-~ r .- ~ ;,;;r,,;, uncut ui umfor:niry previously fount in section 17958.7 for nonconforming local building regulations that wercenatted an orbcfore "JOVember 23, 1970 (Stars. 1950. ch. 1293, p. 4331, 4 t). As meruioncd, wha[ we have now is a state premption of the field of building standard 2guladdr., except for such now tore limited deviations therefrom u the Legislature has speciOcaUy pemtietd ?oval agencies. Our atteruion is particWarly and specifically directeA to three sections oC the Law in which the Legislature hs permitted such activity: scuivns 17922, 17938.3, and 17938.7. &fwc we rum ro mein, however, we wilt b^~:Ily relate uum to each other and to other sections oCNe State Housing Law. We have mentioned how taro sections of the State Housing taw impose a duty on the State Fire Marshal m prepare and adopt building sandams - 2ladng to ceruin aspens of fire prevcndon in mWtiple story swaurcs let for human..".abitativn (§ i79?0 ~)+ndim nvtets•. mv:xls, lodging iwuses. apamnent houses and dwellings, arb buildings in general (4 1792!, cube. (b)). But the major Nmst of 4te Law, is cgtumed with building sundaNS (end omer r. gulations) prcparctl and adopteA by Nc Deparumcnt of Housing and Cum- -- .... ~~ '(1rigiraP Prior Ols2li~'/ lay A170R\FY GE\'ERACS Or'NO~S Velumc 73 m unity Development. Subdivision (a) of section 17921 imposes a duty upon that deparm7nm (cC,§ 17920, subd.(d))to adop: building standards (othetthln Ihox mia7ing to fire and panic satdy) for the pmmaion of the public health. 5afcty and general welfa.'e with respect :a the Consimction, aheration, repair, etc., of all betels, motels, lod;ing houses, apartment houses, and dwellings. (§ - 17921, suhd. (a).) As with the Fm Marshil's building standards, those of the department arc submitted ro [)te State Hutlding SnndaMS Commiuion for approval and irxlusion in the State Building Standards Code, underute State Hooding Standards Law (div. 13, p[.25, § 18901 et itgJ. Subdivision (a) of section 17922 inquires that the building standards thus adopted by Ute depat'mlcnt "impose Subs[anNilly the same inquirnnentt as are contained in the moo recent editions o((various) uniform indusuy codes .. . ." (g 17522, subd. (a)J (See genaraliy, 63 Gps.Cal.Atry.Gm 366 (1980.) Secuor. 1"938 then essentially makes thou standaNs applicable in all cities arrd counties: it permits cities and aounties to make changes or madifintiora in them oNy i(tM changes would "impose the same requirements;' and it provides drat if a dry or cuumy does not amend, adopt ar repeal ordinances or regu;ations to impose thou rcquimmenes, dfey wiD become applcable in such city orcounry 180days aftenhay are published int+le Sate Building Standards Code! (See ilso. § 18941.3, subd. (a)J Hut there is one nonble exception to Yecuon 179381 Under saddn \. 17938.3 a city or county may make changes oc modifications to the building starx7aras adopted pursuam to union 17922, subdivision (a), "u it demr- mmes... arc reasonably neassarv berana nt levm ~lima«! ...1...:--, -- -...e.~.... wpagraptiical conditlans:" (§ 17938.SJ Section 17938.7 provides that (or any such change to be etYective, the local jurisdiction must makes an express "finding" that it is reasonably necessary heuuse of those par&vlar local conditions. and it must file the "finding" a~th Ne Department of Housing and Community Development Sawm 17951 'n.mt•ruyRU:dad in Sev,m• r795a{and 1" 979,•nyc,ryMmwrym•r N•ka Aunty N uu pwnna. .d9p•d wu,~:N w a..vm 1793: rd pueLMm x uw SuR amda{ SunGm: CoLMUw onmR{uNUaw am..n.r •d.yudpunuuvwSeaJm 11931n•9,nW, •dd,w n-, :al ndin•rcn d n{clwau vpsa bnrwa,hc urm rtgn,~nnu u sRmnumal m cb prmvim• •d~ub wRV•N n Swim 17931 M publi•bad a Jn Sus auilam{ fvmanN rpdt W as allm R{uNYam dapd pumaN m fawn I lgriMm•aa aMnln % mW,fwriwu n lya•a Rgdmiaav wan atyrw f ndinV wRUm n fae.m• 191513 w1 17971.7. !r sl cbY or cam•y d9as 99i vnmd, •dd, a npM orfiiv:s• n npNUm• n rcwu ihtvs mina,RNU m mW .JRn{m c~ m•b'S;cv:su ., ~,dr nm,i,mu,u win caYrL: fW6in1•, Jw pn' i.iAl• P,M,N•C m Nl Swia 9 Idm/ fY,lOMdl CYM M IIM dam rtrvN:iau ponulpua ;.unun m Scum 179:] Jua x pplinbla n tt aN Wes aamrm J/swra Ib myJwrpnlu•uw MN•pmma•wn. Amndmenu, WJillm4 and dalui9al n iM Sun aua{in{ Sund•~a CAda adopul M a cny w amny prw•nt lo5actim 179f1.T, n{wMr ~,Vt •d rypumbN puwma d Jv fuw awlau{ Sundanal C9da, sb.a bNma erfeeu.e l Iadrys dm wM,nlgn duo Suv BuJdn{ Sundanl• CWa yy Na fun auddm{ Sum•n• Cmm~,•:Im - ~... W ..e -_-. EoJ _c .' .__ ~. __ _~ .. ._ __ Qrigin'a1 door Quaii: ~- aqumbn 1989 etrdRNEY CE'.°RA CS OP'elo~'S 117 The firs[ question asks whether under sections 17922. 17936.3 and 17958.7 a city ar county may adopt building standards which are more s.ringent than thnae adopted by the Swte Firc Marshal? Thc cisenu of the answer is simple; Inasmuch as section t 7922, upon which the other sections are ptedicatcd, only deals with building standards adopted by the Departmen[ of Housing and Community Dev;lopment and r.~; thou adopted by the State Ere Marshal, none of the sections about which we arc asked provides authority for a city or county to adopt more suingent standards than those adopted by the later. q. Section [7922. As just mentlorcd, section !7922 directs the Depart mmt of Housing a[td Community Development in adopting building standards for approval by the Commission on Housing and Community Development under the State Building Standarts Law m "impose substantially the same requirements as are eontainW in the most recent edidons of (various] uniform industry rades ... :' (¢ 17922, subd. (q: see 63 Ops.Gl.Atty,(iert. 366 (19g0)J when spczking of building standads, all of the subdivisiotu of the section refer to thou of Wt Ddpanmen[. 7Tus the section wmmenea: "(a) Eaaept as otherwiu specitcall)' provided by law, the Duildin: standards adtroted anA submitted Dv Ne deoarmtent for approval ... and the other rules and regulations ... adopted .. . ~ pursuant to this chapter ... shall impou sabstutdaUy Ne same requirements u are contained m the ma9t recent editions of Ne Pollowtng uniform induttry codas a, adontrd by the nMs.._..:; ~. spccrircd,...^ (Emphasis added) Subdivisions (c) and (d) of d:e section each commences with the similar referenda "(c)(and (d)] RegWuions other than building standads which aze adopted, amended or repealed Dy the department and Wilding starMalds uloaed a^.d submitted by the dcoarunem for aooroval .. , ." (Emphasis adde0.) Nowhere in sttedan 17922 is any reference made w building sandards adopted by the State Fre Marahal. ps was sun at the very outset of Nis Opinion, Dis adoption of W ildinc standards for submission forapproval to Ute Commiasion on Housing and Community Developmen[ and incorporation rn the State Buildln j Standards Codc is dieted Dy other provisions of law, viz.. seaidrs 13 iOS, i itd7~ 79tna.6, '.2l', :792v.7, and i7921ry). h is true that two of the seru;ore pursuant to which the State Ere Marshall adopu building standard'. 17920.7 and 1792t(b), are found in the Stav. Housing Gw a:d indeed appear in the very same chapter in which secGOn 17922 is found. But when section 179?: speaks of building standards, it does r ('.:~~in~1 ~OOy ~~ -- ixe nTiOA,~'EY GEVEML'S OpPIOVS VdumeR not refer m huilding standards that arc adopted under the chapter of the State Housing Law in which it appears, as it refers to oNer regulatioru that arc a: opted thereunder. Such a re(ercnee could bring the building standards adoped by the State Fire Marshal pursuant to sccdons 17920.7 and 17921(b) within its ambit instead, as we have xm, whin action 17922 speaks of building standards. it specifically and continually infers to Nox that ve adopted by the Doparunrnt of Houxing and Commurttry I?ev9Jopment Ac- wrdinglythe setxion would riot pmvide authority for a city or county to adopt 'ouilding standards which arc more svingem than thox of the State Fite Marshal.' B. ~ectierle 17998 Ann 179cg < As tlxntioned, when the 1970 ammd- menu ro the Sute Housing Law were first enacted, xcdon 17958.5 gave broad authority for cities or coundet to make r3langu or modifiaeons in the state building standards ukrn from the uniform building codes m adapt them w local conditions! In 1980, however, die Legislature amended the sectlon and grt-dy rcsWcted the types of local wndidons for which a deviadon from statewide standards could tx made: It limited them to toW Climatic, geographical, or topographiW condition:. (Buts. 1980, ttl. ] 30, p. 303, § 2; Stars. 1980, ch. 1238, p. 4208. § 9.)' Section l7458S turrmdy provides in pan as follows: `' ' Werrtawvnrnu are rve4vyrm drlabn 179rS OOx pre+idl (s1{nm rmrirdlml vmherity. SuhdiNdon N)'grinary rl^ wnrny' nurwl n/WNar N 6u uw d lod ec mre n9u'~-wnmu, but M avwr, WddLra neva, rke W rtar Y•p slailamlRr, W propmy tuu •... •. •.. - •::•y,t,.q.:~r..w i+,.:v~iw,nnlrrarb naumt t~wl.' 7M vu of rte plvrr },a.y,Aeu,dms rrY npimmnl /and ar,a loll b I,M Srro Nowiy :++I" »auia mvvn rnr bet gWnbo r rtorl rw rrvW uk. p.Wrnw e.e mytlurp /eud'm dw Sua NvurollJW. (Cr,/n Rv Muviore./Dnro(I%1)IlGI.AppId 173.671 ar. 7;Sau,~CM/r~u. v Superi.v C.u.l !1963) ]at Cv1.App.71691. 6936%.) Thu .mW ircluer as sin liw WMrI'r W 6dm{ wrrrdrrdv wAleb om raopod Nrww u raianr 17971 W 1792x7. Nowrvr.rW paakrn.rrA •aF'IYut dw rrrrmd jvrlWioim A rvediv4blr R) b qo FYO MrnAvll Wddmt ruoiAr Y dur u. r. ew Gnwoil (1971)31 GLAppa6lt, 60 (e.rvrvkd m oNertrerodr sArnerulHawr arra6rnne,. /nc v. CLYNLwrmrl(1%6)1 {CoiJd SR, 5%M.11); DIeW kinNwaiwO(n.v,O,~iff+weul d Centt•. Co., vvry, st W.ANr.ld 711.217.) Pang it N rw riot mditbuay nu alrn WreW 9Y <irir vnd ewriu (rarsNUrv. Cwy Car.'I.vyru v 62 nfrnint w Crl Cerra, rn 7[L. 1; d. 11930b). 1{9D9(v). Ga. Cod., df1(q, L5/3% W i. m nrw.i0+1rI6r dw Suu Girt MrNW rrdd lw nv.lv.d n uklarnt Wa1w{ wrndordl dmnnaY. r.oa aN'gr6'u trvr d rore.M 1rd pnWinim u rve4vkuw R) n . ruy Wyud mo,' a •u EY impsudm.dmkl d ur1 foul d In)'tr{rurPnrdia)m; (faurale FLe fMrAav Dw. v, O~ 1 fiwntrf d Crva. Q.uryrw, SI r'+tAppN 311. Y7), and u wrdr, ra,Jd M V • aromdwurwlry u ur n My rer. ro1.h vt.bprv.,; WMna amYrY. (/ddJ ~ N vNuroaY acad. ram 17951! vimply prvNded IAn'Ir,: rduFir{ h wrauoau a rvpdxknr {urwaa a a.aiva 17931.. my m Dewy mvr mlkr rva da,6n w moltfimmr k w -^•~~-na.-~Lx-;;a9•r.: t~.ud pur .r rv ki~an i79i uwdaa,rev va,uwrrdy neorury Iweur dbW mMnrmr.' Ruu. 1%e, rp. 1176, P Pf31. 1.) ~ Th. kn6nim wu bud m In Gpinim w hId irryd u 1971 o rlrkA .. uf/ rlw dv hro phnu Saul omdnirr^ aodd ra Ndue peliuul, urnanu m wavl pM1aronmr, krr it deuvy my pmribiliry d nanrido ruafmwrry H MubN1 eotu, ud a ro arwludea Nu rhr rmn nhrW •mly u mndlYmr'~IIaA Try br Irbk1 brmAY Y {K/rptrtll P a9v11 nptlLr1.' !Sl dpl.('Jt,AYy.fM. Mt. IIS !1971)) Wr iuelyd Wr xrnmm rMv Yun Irra rd fuller threw W iu ,vmrnutiam ru •'+~r ~ ~(~PlP!n~P dbOQY QU81!{'j ~ ScMnmhr 196'+ Att0R~F.T GEVEP.ACS07I?40R5 rn "(a) Except as proviAeA in $eeswn 17922.6 iwh,ieh deals with Ue Of ice o(NOisc Cnmrol establishinC minimum noise insulation sandards for certain multi-nttupant dwellings), in adodin¢ the orcinancc retu) ations nursu an: m Section 77938. a city or W unp~ may miu,c such chanCe3 or rnodificauons in the rcpuisements canuined in the provisions quhlishcd in the State BuildinC StandaMs Code anA the other teCUlations adopted purcvant!o Sec:ioc 17922 as it deur• mines, pursuant to the provision9 ofSection 17938.7, am reasonably naessary because bf iota[ climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. (9) For purposes of this subdivision, a city and [panty rosy make reasonably necessary n;odifications to tM rrquinmenrs, adopted purnran[ m Section 17922, contained in the provisions of the cMi and regulations .n the basis of local conditions' (g 17938,3; emphases added.) While it may appear at first glance dut subdivision (a) of action 17935.5 ..Quid cnablu a ei[y or county to impou strictu building sundardsthan arose adeptcd Dy uhe State flrc Marshal if called for by Ne particularitie of local • climes~is.geotogial,ortopographiccordi[ions.'°whcnonefotlowsthroughto caamint the sccdors rc2trrQ ro in the snhdivision. oru ties that a does not. Subdivision (a) of action 1'9583 authonza cities and counties (i'J in aAOpting ordinance or regulations py„renanr [n S rinn 1795g, Qi) to make L, chances inthe requ!romcna contained In the provisions ofthe Sute Building Standards Code and the oUser regulations adomed~mimians rnv,°..r~,itm 7792, Stttion 17938, we recall, provides that rides and wunties muss adopt the state buildin¢ standards nmm ~d~er. witnm melt respec- live jurisdictions wt[hin 180 days, lest Nry be made applicable in Nem by operation of law, But it also provides shat [hose Iocil agencies may (i) make Granges in thou standads if that would impose "the same sn~uirements" as would have been impasW by them, and (ii) that Ney may change or modify the stain sundartls ilfound to be necessary because oflocal climatic, geologi- cal, or topographical conditions. (See fi. 6, ante.) -fhe problem with using uc[iosu 17935 and 1)938.3 u auUrority (orCideS or counties [o adop[ mote sttjngent building standards, ilbeir for limited seasons, [tun those adop[cd Dythe State Fire Marshal, is Ura[bo[h sections refer taGlusively to buildin; atandattla (or Other regulations) ad0pted.latml7aLtQ section 17922 but Ural seaion, as uen, deals oNy widr building standaros . adopted by UseDepanmemofHousingandCommunityDevelopmcn[and-ot those of the State Fire Marshal. Since section 17922 does not purpm to dcsl w9;i, buiiAing s[anndards ^oprd by the State Flm Marshal, neitxr could p.° Fn.en d dw Csmmbnan m Hmrlna ma M`d°Pmau, Rm (A P,'a Cal.Airy.Gm. 7N.773.779, +w~ ) ,a Fa •°rnpi°. meat Y,° rvb2'Wion. ° °in' a amnrv mule rroaiAi N. w° d mwnnJr. °~lunm,,,muipumt, drvua, .nny. vmu, nr m°UKrh a! mmwnim. (17971 a67 fe, ) \.+ W ..c ~.~ .i_.. -_. .__ ._ __ __._ 'a~~gt~~1 Post Qua~n ;ye AnowvereEVEa:,~sovc~~ovs vaLmen ~..i section 27958 white refers :..t, norsection 17958.5 wNch refers to the latter m cum. Accordingly. neither section 17938 norsadon 179583 could provide authoriry for tides and counties to adopt s¢icter building standards than those adop[cd by rot Sute Fue Marshal C, ~ eeinS n t~9sg 7 Section 17958.7 pcescdDes the express finding drat a sty or county must make before modifying state btdldlag standards artier section 17958.5: "(a) Except as provided in SeWon 179226, the governing body of a dry oredumy, before making anv tnodifleations orchanees wrsnam m Section 179583, shaII make w express fulling that such modifiadons or danger are reawttably tlrsessary beaaux of loaf climatic, geological ortopogrsphicalcottditions, Suchalltsding shaLL be avai4Me u a public retmrd A copy of sudt flrdings, mgether with the modiftution or thaoge expressly marked and identiflad to which taro such finding refers, shaIl he tiled with Ne dewrmtem. No such modification or change shall become effective oroperedve forany ptupox Itnlil the flttdine and the madifcation orchan¢e have been filed with the deoaranene "(b) 7'he deoattmatt may tejettamodiLcation or change Sled by the govertdng body of a dry or cotutry if tm finding was sub- mirted" (!r 17958.7; emphases tided} L- T71e problem widt viewing section 17938.7 u wthoAry for a bcal agency m make changes in fwildidg aurldatda adopted by the State Fm Marshal is thaz n refers m momnwona or tatanges a ary or couny would mass pursuant m section 179385, but as we Dave just stmwn that section applies only to changingdtebuWotgsundardsoftheDepartmentofHoutingattdCommuniry iJevtlopmem and sot thou of Ne Sam Fte Marshal. Indeed, dx weearess of our perception is cw![rmed Dy rite tegtdtemmt of section 17958.7 for any such dungea m be approved by "the deparhnaerc'^' Thus, xenon 17958.7 would not wthoriu tide or etnattlea m adopt more strirlgem l7uildingstand- ards titan thou adopted by the State Fue Marshal It has been auggestW d. .t the axtion may do so indirectly beaux of a teramt amasldmad m section 189415 of du; State BuiWitl4 Siardards Iaw. TAat section was amended last year (Stars. 1988, ch. 1302, p. (3314),; 1) and row reads as follows: "(a) The M:ilding stardardt contained N (Ne various Unilbnn '~ ~ ~_a.ej 1! te.s~.-ed m dx Ssx e7e!ding Sr^.da.M~C~ s~~" a.•-u.-y ro all otcupancia throughwt~dte state and shall become effective n Taa poa[wal n[aua~rrar uw mraia[d PoNnle rd lw far[.ih tin Dyuwrwr mere eryuenJy mudaa 'u • Nurnel ro WalaYeirvl Wawa d eAanatl tt xIWtGOIIpIA" (S7 Oae.GLAw.CM. Na. LIS. m:1A riri.r fin,. raal .w i1u.: ....'sae ak:[O~re.G:: cr G.. .. ~ - ;7l :77, cups; l7 f)pe.GLAay.Gm. IS7, I[t, nya) ~-. r'~ ,-- ~ 'O~iginal Poor Qua(!ty Sernxtn lrtl4 AITOR'.EYGE+EML'S O'C~70>.'S I91 1d0 days nRer puhlica[ion in the Stare Building Stmcdvds Code by the Sts:e Building Standards Commission. "(b) Amcndmena, additlons, and deletions to Ute Sute Bwid- mg Swndards Code adopted by a city, Bounty, of city and county pczuan[ to subdivision (c) or putsuan[ m Sei:ion 17953.7, togeNer widt all applirabic portions of Wt Sute Building Standards Code, shall bceome eRemive 180 days aRer publication of the Smre Build- ing Sundatds Cods by the Stars Building StandaNS Commission "(c) Neither tM State BWldina SundaMs law.. , mr the applicadonofbui{dingstandardscoptainedinWlaxfaa0ns limit the authorise of a acv calmly or pry and wunry [o rstaDlisA mor_ ttstricdve building standards ttssanably nersssarv beaux of local climatic, aeob¢irat, or «roognphical conditions. The govetuine bodLhaB make the Andina teguireA by Section 17958.7 and theother ttquirranents imposed by Section 17958.7 shall cooly ro [hat flnd- i~" (ESOphuis addcdJ The suggestion is that undersubNvuian (c) a city orcoun[y coWd adop[ a matt rs[ricdve bWlding standard than one adopvA by the Sute giro Marshal and published in the Sute Building Standard Code if it properly makes a lending under section 17958.7 drat such is "Peasdnably naessary beaux of local climatic, geologicalarmpognphieai conditions." ~ We rcjectthe suggestion Subdivision (c) of sedan 189413, as arnetrded. Coca no[ pmvide an Indeperden[ grant of authority Poe titles and cdundes [o act. Rarher, it spraW in negative terms of tat limiting the aumodty of those :oval •nr:A•..n _ +brw.~ ..i- ~ ,cwi~urc oWldmg standards becatue Of the existurtx of lost climatic, geologica4 or apognphital catsdidons. The grant of such "au[horiry" must thettfott be found dsewhett. and it is - in seetiotts 17958.5 and 17958.7 or rM Sure Housing Law. But once so found, the mrasvrc of the authodty of chits and counties m act under those see'dons is defined by Weir terms, and dray, u justahown, do not teach bulld;ng standards adopted by the Stare Fite Marshal. Ittasmuch a xedon ! 8941.5 does not independendy gtarrt authority to tides and counties m aa, it woWd not penis thox local jt:risdietions [o adopt mote stringent building standards for Weir iurisdicdons than those adopted by We Suce Fite Mazshal. To suaroattxe our anawu to the fltst question Wen: Since section 17922 ofthe Sute Housing Law does not deal with building scvtdards adopted by the Bute File Marshal neiWer it. not semocs 17958.3 and 17933.7 which are preAicaxd upon it. can authorise z diry or co;:rt:y id adopt mom ~nr;,;,; tu'dding standards reiadn8 to flrc and panic eatery drat[ thou adopted by We Slate File Marshal. Again Waugh. this answer is confined by the parameters of the opinion raquesr and relates soiefy ro those duce specific sections about whirls we weft asked. `.• J u4fi ~ ~~JTlglfl2~ ~'OOf Q~ ~ ": 1S1 A1TOtL`rEY CZ1'EAAL'S 0-!'~'f015 ]'vlvmr T. '~~` :. Fre Prmectien Districts Adootine A Fim Prevendon Code Or Ordinances With Building Standards Tnat AR More Srrinaen[ Than Those Adop[ed By Tt:e State Fire Marshal And Con[ained In The State Bmtdina Standards Code. li;ililce tides and counties, fire protection districs are not granted broad polio power authoriry by the state Cotscadon (CL, Moore v, M_aictpal Caarr (1959} I7Q Ca11.pp.2d 5a8, 353: 68 Ops.CaLAtty,Gen 223, 7,29 fi. 3,) They are (xanuu of statute, which serves m define their powers geld dutiae. (Cf, 68 Ops•Ca1.Atty.Cxn. az 228: 25 Ops.Cal.Atry.Gen. 23a, 233 (t93~; 30 Ops.CaLltry.Gen a7, a8 (19a7).) Fin promedan disttlca a]e preaeotly organirsd undtr the Flte Protection Disuict Lew of 1987 (div, 12, pt 3, § 13800 et seq.),'1 Tllaz 1sw gives them authoriry; - m adaptotdinences(¢ 13861,SUbd (hp; - m adopt a fire ptevention code by refetrnce, in fie ma:uxt that counties and ciao do (¢ 13869): aM - ro estab8sh odes gad rsgtdadom relating m famishing foe protecton and other services relating to tha protection of lives and Property (§ t 3861, subd. (i); § 13862, subds. (a),(~).'a Would these grans of auW.otiry, eitbersiagulaAy orin combination sutllorize ~' a ate protection disviet m dopt a tLe protection code or regulations with 'a r^ !°^....:+iwr. rTrir dr Pw Yiaueom Diann W d l%1(trra 1%1, m tat. l: d(•. t:, R 27. Lilal a q.),M'1rYad k rag ~ Fa Radea Lro(a l~r d 19R. (Sea ;9C1, m.101t lsa SOf, egre,l. f0, i r,) Fad. t•y p.ti r7 M yrarnrivr, dioia erpdard « rzmt>vlara a,bar rrrpl)r'r~rir[rl r riNO u it'r Md lr drLrirO prwllr r Or (vew ,nl... '(11101. rL1 (~)) Nalaa4 ~dw.wsd raw.r,.. Pmraw DhrNWU(od m Ati...r»F.A4er A1:.,:., .,. A'-.tt a~`Pe,e Pnee.l n.: ~ 1T'lldrd harNAllp ~1 fV[rr(fliPlld~'Irtrr11 G10e~Mp{nfY aOYrdM!•~a11R 191T, i1 Sgiv17M1,rwrrydrmtr drlrNP`rrdN.DwNY.pw14u1 itrrrfdbrr. •A drain rMa Mr W YY aerie. W Auer « law..'Wrr w yoM1y. oranry a e.ry w 4 pmpera rd ir.w d Wr p.ra o,ebOK, bra 1®W rue raaorha peen; 'P) Tr ~M ordirelArr fdkoMl W Vmrdur d Mort 7 (m~,rnrt1 wN 3eaies 271a0)Ntayurld'pentae taWrSd'rW.]dJe Ceerlbir Cad. (u~ tr.w n1ro, nsro, un1.1 "(U ToerWid red Nonelarar aed nadetiam rwsMediab,iraerioSra+ed4.M .e.er.sdtm.wni~Wrdds.a•. 191p.'~ttl. arrY V]et:,'rYi Aeery laterwee lNd L.y:a lttg ie7s: arr»'idivl'M pnrdea elrelar ..'. ral (dl,u °dt::adererel anarpawde•i.tnYemr ervfae rlLeft rn ae PpeeoarM4ree rN paprty.' ((Q, rul+d. (fA) tsrien 111da ePeiilwDY aw°a. Fw hnrrien Dimru r hd.pr a rue pmegive eode Irv nlereivi ~ u tide eM mraee m r•drr d,. no.anmRr Cea. (Som2:;. (rttdp (tam. U11Ii.) wiwr meY dv r, roe Dirmr'e bv+N u •eee,d . leauleuve bv^7 W me arena ... e„r~aa . I,>ou •tmry • t uses.) ~^_ V s- ' ~rEg°snal_Poor Quaa'_; i SgnemM 1919 ATI'ORhEY GErEaAL'SOTf10~S lqs ~' buildin8 standards drat were more stringent than those of Ne State Fire bTazsnal? We believenoL As we saw in answering rRe fin: qucsdon, the State Housing law ptescndy preempts all local regulation of building standvdt except as the Lcsislature may permit in cenairr areas. As we also saw in that Law, the Lesislarure Ru specifically permitted does anti coutaia a adopt local build- ingstandards which diverge from tRe state standards in certain areas becatue oflocalcondlUons. (4¢ 179383.17958.7) Bu[aswehaveshown.thulimited grant of authority does notpermit those local agenda m adopt more wingmt building standards trlatlhgm Ere andparlic safety thanthosevd,irbarc adopted by the State Fite MatshaL 71te auttadry for Cue protection tlimiat m do so is even more atrrnua[ed because the Legislature hu rat accorded them a ' similar tlmited aumoriry to adopt Uuilding standards which diverge from the svice's stardaAs!' Indeed. u we said iu a ream opitrion, we Imew of Lathing in the Sets Hooting Law that would confer discteccnary audtotiry upon fue protection districts a adopt stricter building stardarttt ttlan are found therein. (ld., a[ 228,229.) Could such authority be found in dre flrc Prorct'tlon Disnia Law itaeL^ 'I]tero we have seen Nu fire protection disui[tt am granted authority to adopt ordinances (¢ 13861, subd. (h)), m adopt a fire prcvendon code by referwlrce (§ 7 3869). and a establish rules and regulations rclatutg. iusralia, m furnistr ing fir. protectitm and odor services (¢ 13861, subd. (i); ¢ 13861, subds. ~.. (a).(t)). 77u LegisLUUre t>u declared the toot provision of Ere ptotecdo~ services m be "crltlta! m the P~IIc Pace, healtb, and safety of the slate" <) 13801) and U[e FIrc Protecrion District Law to be "necessary for the public, health, safety, ar[d w!+I!a+e" if r.idir.), nvwrriutyr, i;c l.c~,;::::.~ yt: ;; :;; ghat dte Law "shall be h'berally COtltntrtd m eftceolarc i0 putpoxs. (tbrd.l (Cf.,A,t~tsYCm ap.clr.suprqu25:480ps,CaLAtry.Gen.225,228.supra; However, the foregoing grants of authority a Ere protection disnirssrr t.;e Fire Protxtlon DlsIIict Law of t' 87 are general aM ace controlled by the more spedtic provisions of the State Routing Law. (Dartvflk Flre Protection Dirr. v, Dr1(JcG supra 38 CaLApp.3d 241, 247: 48 Ops.CtlAtty.Gea. 224. 228-229, supra) InDa+rvlUe tireProrecrfortDfsr. v, DuJ)'el Financlal.4 Constr. Ca., supra, 58 Ca1.APP•3d 241, it wu held that a Prc protection disuia could rat adopt an otduran!x under former section 13849 [now ¢ 13841, subd. (h)j tc re5uire 1' AyiR M'apanne Nd a,xo.'wwwam b'lawr pddiraaa" d dw d/II b naalal'bd [daaylwtYYMf~arraal rYf 0,a. MMtdi{ b~aa' .1{a Odlb!)V'A rC~ilfaM4F ~~rtr ~' r^u~:~.s'~!ss i P!aM'e!.,.v,m ti6?2 xaGviiatb) ~a+t8 aeiora~W afuaWwtaion0isem nuG .uYlanlybadata EW6M wMwda wI,WlNCaw llrb/1M wnOwaub'a i.w ~Ywafin yrotaq,m dlMp Weald Le wendam a 1a•I ja,udiaim" wunb Vb mrwi,a d t4a wN;rtagn, iu 'limned /wm d mnw pe.a ... it h vopliaian a danW d W ow d wry {wnar Pdrdiaoea' (DaurJ4 Fve fwen,n,Dbr. r. Dy]af ii,we41 { Cr.a.. Ca, npa, 3/ Ctl.AppMN1. L>7, wM •* nova rase M. Ve ww.tiwd raw corer mnAi mwn nJ raw t.u0b{ ruMen4. V Cir`lgi~°[a1 Poor ~"`~ is~ •rtoav[YCrxsxu.~s or~wroNS ~•~iw~. r. certain heat and smoke detectoraLLrm systems and file sptinklersystems to 6e installed in specific types of new Mu7dings because the tcqu'uemencs of such werz mote suingent than what was rtspdRd by the State Housing Iaw. (!d. u 243. 2a6-247J T7x basis for the Luling wu that "the Are protection rzquirzmcnts of me dis•.rict were void as dw field was mtally pteen[Pted by the Scale Housing Law." (!d, u 2M.) Indeed, me court spemflcally said stirs aimough the atttlmriry of a Fire Pmtaaion Diurin m "adopt aM enforce Rasottabie oNiaaaw for tM prevehdon and suppression of Dm and eott- aagradotu a[b for tIx pmtxdon and ptaeervation of life aM pmpecry against the htzatds of fiR and conGegndon" (lbrmer 413869) was tuo:d, it wss also getxrai and rmnbolitd by ~ more aped8c prwisiotB of seedvas 17922. 17958, aM 179383 of the Sfax Houthq Law. <!d, u 2a7,)" In 680ps.CaLAaY.Gert.226. sr~ro. we similariY coxludedmume more specific ptovisians of me State liousioj Law eaatmLLcd over the wmority of flR ptotecdon disWas m adopt otttinanocs. w mu despite me ]mguage of seetlon 138Ifl, a Ete pto[eaion disttlC did not stave the wthodry m adopt w otdittma tequirirtg dx iststaltatlon of a watutrsetvoir uthe time of t4nstruc- tion of t[ewtut7dings incMdis[riRbacwsethuwouldimpouamoR s:.:agen[ Stan(lald thm the fiR ArppR3Am1 and watudelivery RQtdRmwta Of mC $t1x Housing Law. (!d, u 228.) L] fan, to mat opirion we wmt tltntter and said dirt the wthority of ik pmttedan dtmicts m adopt ocdinattres "mus[ fti limited ... m thou otdirtanas [mt in ootdltn wim wy Omer snx law," (/d, ~ at 2<9J" t4hac b ntre ofine authoriryof flsepraecdoadisbias m adop[ ordi[talrccs (6 13861, wbd. (N), would be equaLLy tttu of its wthotiry m esnbiish noes ."e .",.d.«.......t~~'y ~..°.;,, ~..-..:,,,uGr. iai,i vwca a<niuca lag UOOIIt)~ t 3862(a)(t)). eom gtatm at wmoriry would be subject m the more specific provision, of IbC Stag HOUS1t1$ hw. 'ILe kg{slutve hismry ofine FlR 1TsMc[ PtotectlonLaw of 1987 convin- ces us that the LeglsLmte aver Grtertded fbe pmrecdon dtsaicu m be able m adopcotdinanas seIDngfanh bttildiltg standuds snisurmmthose ofthe irate. As six H81 whi W enacted that Law (SB Sly Itavelcd mtough the kgitladve process. is wss amended savenl times. As originally iataodutxQ std prior m i1 4 u iaeti4lrw,W W y~erwtlMairt raM pgR,ea dmlon beaaptaAt,eaue- (nt{I.wOL@))Y nor,.bcy~anewtraalwesNn.ua,raariw'eAFean~hienty' .Nd.ee /o~i a:>M Pa+Nr aY eau 4. MOw.+itY. " lw eYe.6t Dye.dMay.0~.6s.61Y(I/lak~A.t~awmvlYO/'iEr Mpitibia.e t..Pydfa~rw::ie~DIM.~MpW~iwlalrlmnu.NSrpMi+~MuYdnnarkr e ~ anula 1eYre i waYaedaa.ab erepriae eed oassdyat t~~ dNe ar rin.wa, W,WIOOw.CaU.].daQ.IS.M.~•Mnwma6W mrmnt4MriWbttMHaattenr~Ca ~!!!w!~ amen ['txa: s5d ,xea}eoa Ar, ~ atGafa.ati .Ias..~ a~waa a rwNUa. u u aeenM t,pa a ~~ nN w ewWOeoes.e Mppeoo fiwlM.r ~ Inn eaepYet ~, onwnn nvauiaa Y laneanioe d ~ 7a,ttD pact .Wr aeaea'.abN rws,Y Miele eemp,ut, elont . ua eeneuW geipnat l,vir au,e W. eM pe.epel the ddldewr,agU en1 ueueranp nWWwi. ~3~l~+ifi8! ~t~l]f ~(UQlli~ \..~ .__ _~ F¢; _~ .~ ._ . sq~uroea 1989 AT70R'.'EY GEYERACSUT'IUNt ;v5 amerdmcrr_s made on.4pri] 20, 1987, section 13861. wN. , defines Ne powers ~t a fire prorecdon dicvict, wn:arned a subdivision to include among Nose powe~s,one••(tlo adoptortlinanuspursuantm8ection 17958." At Nerequest of the Califonua Building Industry Association, the author of me legislation requseed an opinion of [.egistaave Counsel at m wheNermat woWd incrcasc the authority of fire prevention dittricu Legislative Cowssel rcttdercA m opimon on Apri13:19$7 (M 7483) a^swetins a c'fe afl5rm:dve, saying thu the subdivision would incrcue the ezisrag authority of foe protection dutricts by allowing Nero ro adopt their own, mote stritrgent but7didg codes. Opposition from the Califotttia Bur7ding Irdustry Association lt4 m the deletion of the subdivision from ate Bill. (Sa. A x~ op. ctr. supra, a pp. 7.26.) '"Ihe coons Gave repeatedly concluded that when Ne Legislature h>.t rejctted a sperific provision which was part of an as whm original]y intro duced, the taw as enacred should trot be wnsaued m mnuitt drat provision (Cirauotts.)" (Ventura v. CiryofSanJote(1984)151 Ca1,App.3d 1076, tO80J It will be recalled t!u[ section 17958 authorizes citus and counties, (i) m make changes in stale building staMards N apptytng Karl m tfuu respective jurisdicions as long as they impose Ule same requvaorsrct a dose adopted by Nc Dcpanmerrt of Housing and Cotnmuniry Ikvelopmen4 or pi) m make changes or modifications in Nose rcquirearents for local cllmatle, gmlogteu or mpographical reasons. Who Ne atorcgoing legislative hismry teachu, )s Na[ Ne Legislature rejected Ne suggestion that fire protection disttias be ~- aushoriud to alter snte building standards adopted under tM Stme Housing Law u all. Thaz woWd certainty mean that tlx LegistaluR did rot inrcad fire mr.n.:n.. A: _.?:_ ~ ~cpt -iric au uracra uuuatag sasmatbt dlan tt¢ NOEL of the Stale. (SCe also, Snss. 7988, ch 1302, ¢ I, supra, unending ¢ i 89413) As we said earlier, "(wlhu cities and counties may regulate wiN regard co building cotl5trttcdon srandards ... must be distinguished from Ne respon- sibilities of fire protection dis[ticts order tM State Horrsutg Law," (68 6ps.Ca1_4vy.Oea226, 228, supra.) Tnat Law imposes upon Ne clue! of any fire deparenen[ or district providing flrc protcedon services. and rhea audmtized rtptuarmtives, Ne dory at entoroing N Neir respective args "all of those provisions of (Ne Smre Housing Law)." (¢ 17962; cf., ¢ :7966; 69 Ops.Cal.Atry.Gen 260, 253-265 (1986).) Thal would include an obligation m eNOra the stm dtilding standards relating m fire and panic safety promW- gated by Ne Staee Fire Marshal (as well at Note of the Depatmrem of Housing and CammuniryDcveiopmen[) and publlsheC in the Slue Building Statwatds ~~ Code. It would also include the obligation m earvr„e nay city armunty code because the adoption of Noss local cedes is specifically compelled by provisrons of the Static Hooting law. (§ , 7958.) Accordingly, we conclude Nat a firs protection dasUict may not adopt mors svingmt building rcgWatians Nan Nose of the State Foe btarslral. `v I~ RANCHO CUCAMONrA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT '~. I DATE: June 5. 1990 mp; Chairman and Members of the Public Safety Commission ~, '~ r~ROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief ~ SUBJECT: CONSIDSNATION OP A RECOlOBNDATION TO TNS CITY I, CODIICIL RHGARDING A PNOPOSBD RPSOLOTION AND OADINANC8 AISSImKENP3 R&QDIRING THB INSTALLATION ~ OP AOTOMATIC PIRS SPRIlUD.Eit9 IN RSSIDBN?I11L OCCDPANCISS The following staff reports, proposed resolution and ordinance amendments are submitted for your consideration in providing recommendation to the City Council regarding the installation of automatic fire sprinklers in newly constructed single and multi-family dwellings. This matter was originally referred to the Coaimiasion by the Board/Council. On April 3, 1990, the Coawiaaion submitted its Tn.`mmm~nAa~~nn !._:~ ~- - .-was Y/QVYRGll regarding the use and effectiveneaa^ oE~~automatic Eire sprinklers. On April 18, 1990, the Board/Council (after considering Commission input and the supporting factual information) directed staff and legal counsel to prepare the appropriate legislative documents for Commission consideration and recommendation. Additionally, a public hearing has been advertised in the Daily Report on May 18th and 15th for your June 5, 1990 Commission meeting per Board/Council direction. The Building Official and Fire Mazahal have jointly developed the attached reports, findings of fact, resolution and proposed ordinance amendment• with appropriate direction from our legal counsel. Respectfully aubmi {tted/~y ,/A ~~~~J~if~J~Y~ iJ L. Dennis Michael v Fire Chief LDM/rb Attachments C CITY OF RA.tiCHO CL'CaHOYGA STAFF REPORT BATE: I TD' FROM: SUBJECT: June i, 1990 Puht is Safety Commission Jerry Grant, Building Official RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE ~u sra~ i.'^. <, ~~'~ > ~- _: ='~ G n 7i Z t9rT I 4ECCMMENDATION: IC is recommended that the Public Safety Commission review the attached proposals, consider any testimony received at the hearing, and make recommendation to the City Council as to inclusion of additional regulations into the Municipal Code regarding resi den ti at fire sprinklers. I1. BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of April 18, the Louneil directed staff to prepare an ordinance regarding additional requirements for residential fire sprinklers and referred the matter to the Public Safety Commission for review, hearing, and recommends H on. The City Attorney has recommended that any provisions in this regard be incorporated into city build inq reaula rsnn" _,,, ;;,;~,aLion of a recent e!!crr.c; "a~,a,ai opim on, and because ail other construction regulations in the Municipal Code, rela ling to private Dro perty, are administered by the Building and Safety Division. He has further indtta led that the fire code, administered Dy the Fire District, should 6e revised to eliminate conflicts between the two codes. Since the Building Code nos heen developed to re 9utate construction and the 'ri re Code fs a maintenance code, the recoawendatton is valid. Accordingly, the accompanying documentation includes: (a) proposed revisions Co the Uniform Building Code (Exhibit "A") that will require installation of fire sprinkiers in all new residential buildings not Dresentiy designated as requiring them by the published codes; (b) Copies o/ two standards, NFDA 130 and NFDA 13N. fEanibit "B"), pubic:hed by the Rational Fire Protec t!on As;acietion (NfPA), annotated to re*~ect where changes in the content are proposed; and, (c) an outline of the proposed modifiwtlons (Exhibit "C") incorporating a brief ex pianatton of the effects of the proposed changes to the Standards and the reasons for Same. ?uhlic Safety Commission June >, 1990 RES IOENTI AL FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE Page 2 It is anticipated that when conclusions are reached in the Public Safety Commission deliberations, the NFP0. Standards will be rewritten as necessary io incorporate concluded modifications, reformatted to be consistent with already adopted Su it ding Code Standards and presented in or]inance form to the City Council for further consideration. R I. ANAL YS (5; the City's current Cuilding regulations include requirements for installation of fire sprinklers in individual apartment and condominrum Coil dings containing more than 15 dwelling units or more than two stories in height, and to hotels and motels containing 20 or more guest rooms. The accompanying proposals will expand the sprinkler requirements to all other residential structures, attached garages and carports, and certain other detached accessory buildings. The Standard used for installation of "conventional" sprinkler systems in c:;rrently regulated residential Du ildings, Uniform Building code Standard ?8-1, is eased on a third Standard, (NFPA 13), artd is the same as is used far commercial and industrial buildings. The pro DOSed Standards (NFPA Standard 130 and 13R) were developed s Decificaliy for resident cal occupancies up to four stories in height, contains exceptions for small spaces, attics, and accessory areas, has Less stringent design parameters than NFPA 13 and, in general, is mare specifically oriented to life safety than to property tats reduction. The proposed mbdifications to Standards NFPA t30 and 13R wtll, in general, remove many of the exce pitons found in the printed Standards, and will add additional limitations, thereby providing a higher level of protection L`,ar. :"• nri oinai pu bifcatf on. Sprinkler provisions adopted by surrounding jurisdiet~or,: -ar• closely follow the published Standards than those proposed for Rancho Cucamonga, however, most neighboring cities vary in their requirements to sane extent. Staff wilt be reviewing differences between Rancho Cucamonga proposed regulations and those of surrounding juri Miction, in order to develop, to the greatest extent possible, uniformtt) with other cities throughout the Mest End. A comDliation of differences nn4/or further input wilt be pravlded at the Commission meeting. 14. LONCLUS30M: The proposals before the Conmission are the result of a number o discussions betwecn the Buitdi ng and 5a fety Divi lion and Fire District staff end represents the joint efforts of bath agencies in carrying out perceived City Council direction. Respectful i/"y/, S~'u'fb~mi tied, ~L' l J~~ Jerr Grant Bui ding Official JRG/kes ~,~9 E-Xh,~i I PROPOSED ®UILDIN6 CODE MOD[FI CAT IONS -. .Lne nd Section 3802 (h) of UBC as follows: '+' Grouo R ~+vision ! Occu oancies. An automatic sDri nkl er system shall oe instal led throughout every Group R, Division 1 Occupancy as follows: ., ?n every apartment house three :,,~ Wore stories in height or containing more than 15 dwelling units, and every hotel three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms, the system is to be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 39-1, "Design Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems," except that residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the buflding. The water flow alarm for such Systems s ha 11 be monitored by an approved central station, 2. In all new Group R, Division 1 Occupancies, other than those specified in subsection (h) 1, above, the system shall be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-2, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems, 1n Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less than Three Stories in Height," 2. Amend Section 3862 by adding Subsections (i} and (j) as follows: (i) Group R. Division 3 Occu oa~nci es. An automatic fire sprinkling system snail oe ins wii ed in ail new i.roup n, uivisian J uccu pancteS. System design and installation shall 6e conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 38-4, "Insta11aL1on of Automatft fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses." (j) Grouo M, Division 1 Oeeuoanefes. An automatic fire sprinkling system shall be installed in all new Group M, Division 1 Occupancies constructed within ten feet (10') of a residential occupancy. EXCEPTION: Group M, Division 1 Occu pancl es exempt from permit requirements by Section 301 (D) 1 of the Uniform Administrative Code, as adopted. Pr hate garages and/or carports attached or accessory to residential Du tidings maY Oe supplied Eras the systns serving the primary use, however, piping and ins cailaiion within the accessory portions shall be in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1. 3. Amend Uniform Building Lode Standards by adoption of Standards 38-2 and 38-3 (Reformatted and revised NFPA 130 and NFPA 17R). 1'r ~ 1 ~~OYrtWt C i9e9 \FPA. All Ayea knervea NFPA 136 Standard fa tda Imnllatlon of Sprinkler 53stema fa Otte- rod Two.Famlly DenWnp aad rlabile Holnea 1919 Editka Thu edition of YFPA 13D. Standard/ar the lnttallanan aJSprmkle Svr/rrru m One and Twofamdy Owelfiyt and.Nobdr Homn, wu p by the Technical Commtnee an Automauc Spnaklen. rtlraeed lry We Cort<udy Comminr<oo Water Extinruitbio~ 5ynema, and actsd on by We NatioaL Fire ihoucnan AWeinuoo. Inc. tt iu Fall Mtttinl held Yavembp Is•17, 1911 io Nuhvtlle, Tereeaeee. It cap tench br We Sundarde Council oe Louary 11, 1919. with u <QeQive date of February 6, 1919, and sopettnda all preveow editions. TM 1969 aditioe of Wit ttaodetd ha been approved by tM Ampina rational Snadatda imtiwu. ChaoMa othp Wan editonel an indicted by a vtatipl ru:t in tht mupn of the peps on which they appear, Tbae Wus to iadudW u m ud w tlu use m idenufyinl <hangs from tdt pmiow eMuon. OAan W De<eNpmtN d NFPA I7D Reco~nixiy w aced to rednca the an.m.t t; f_ :;,~ ;,,,m tin m teudeatitl oowprncip ~•~_: y~,v<ut or total too at lift by dn), the Committp oe Aummttic Spdakkn ippointed a wbeomtnittp w dt.y 1973 to ptryare a Sttttdud oo We IuauWtioo of Sprtntlp Sytteme in Cron and TwaFamlly ITvelliop and Modde Romp. Tht Subcom- mntee wu mtnpapd of mtmbn of tb• omltdttp an Automatic Spriaklsn and oWp cechoia0y compntat exptrt~ nu nandard cape aubmttad atW adopted u the Annual Meetihl re Cbwp. IL or May 12.16, 1971. The 1910 etWiev waa r eomplne tewna of the 1977 edition ixhtdlel SI uniu white appmpeiau: The 19W edition ietOrpOnttd tlN tendu of the tpidentiet ttm Drib United State Fue A ~dminipnWa Fwoey Mu l4ttuMs Cotpmmion, and the Lae Asldn City Fin Dpmtmtnt conducted the dwe0iy uata Fawory Mmual Rtraateb Cotptartios McNeary (awtahw CaeaWtlel Service end thr CWlav. North CreWim Fin Department conducted tha atabiM bow icon. AMr Nninl prenieal aperiena wiW tM 1910 edition, modidcattone m the anadnr4 i~tehd101 removal d days patamrtm far drygipe tyattme, rete thada W tM 1911 Tbr 1919 aditlas pt4vidd for the t.ewlaiuaa of sa:ifrttp ryattw, u updau a for sR !~ in asa .nd twlrmilY dwNhop, and o1Ytr nn pddaan fa ptlnitioninl of rptdmtial eprinkNn on elo9ed and beamed cmlittq, Re(WAmrnb Gave also boa provided for tM iudbtion of tesidmtW tprinklttt in 6yGumpentun arw. ~O } ~UUEO '~/~~~c~c d.~7cz~ct~ic / ~ !!!3 ~ I3D-I .,p e.sr IJL~-~ I\SiFLL~iIOV pI 5Pt1\[L[L fY8[NS IV 0\6 f\D T'MF\YILY MvILLrvGS ~rD 4011LL NOME eDm.l[I« a w.e« eLDRRRIse1R[ sF[Le., Correluin~ Committ« PMI D. SeuL Qavnpn GyneADiIXL k arwnntn Ir, RMtn E. Spkra s«mrurv quorl Fart Proutuen A tocunon ifon' oOn11 War E LM4 4o!!!:rsc:I i[FYMm i~w. Tlaab J. Era~t Jr, Fu:op Nmwl NetnuD Cory Cwbn J. Dnq Jr..NlM Prormlan Conwlmu RKlW flenrtk Mld Nudbn Aubmtlu Spne• 41<r Cum RMM N. flea .NOOmm.n. vl Jatn W. Volt. lame w vain co, Chele W. 5<tkrr. knurM Eryrmry Corp T«Anicul CommilM on AutoakEk SpriRYNrs L'e.te w. SsYrrr. dambn ScbmMt EnpnamM Caq. Slnttw L Ntae. Jennary Rempr emnl (AlumtD b N. WlncMlll [IM C. NtK Dep. oI PnMK Wnr Pep. FMA9A CFWw L LtnLwL AulaeeK Spnntkr Coq. of Ammo Pe0 ~FSA Ubn N. [tey, !r, CunD Coe Keneriv Reo AIA Tor G. Dtle. N~Ilnn MMW r.•. Rep ANNA JaM L 0.M l'nwn Cuba Coq. 0.p vAA IFPS Lr J. DettlM Undn+nun Lkbrvmle IM. Jtew R. DtnRt~ utn. AW. of Nomt Nllem .vou Nmnm b UD W IIRI Rnbm L Dtta Fin Cancm let. RNwt J. GeE, Fln SpR, Ix. Rro AF[A W Dw4 HRea CoN CeaeT fie Oqt Rep. IAFf RkW [. Nt[b, W CpeWRW Rut SRrRa RtN N. Jttre. Rnlf ltepe L AtLaeeela lee. tnMt W. Ilteb. DtlMRewl Rut ItrM R. 1. LttEt. GntetR Me-leetnee 7rr1M Ce U6 Rep. [ASA WeE« N. MtrtlR Id Aeplb Ciry Fin 0.p. Jtet G. O'NtIL Cwr[tltvA ~ AtanLpE leo. J. L RJtbite. Md. Rttekel Car11 MCLPWe L. J. lttlllt~. [MnW Rep Co. J. Tttl StYI- US fiq WblaprlEbn IWM 4rlee b IID nN IJRI wPi L TtRpR- Almlltm Aubeew t,...•w, lne. Rp. AfSA WNWp L Atta Gneetll Fln Imo [pua• Ce. ix. M. vFSA Jtte J. RYM, Uem[ Aua of Jnentigt t Ap pM.e of ll• PhtNRet t Pyt flmtllK of NE VS ~ CeetY MIiE~ Q RYb\ Ctnte M fee RtttRe Wlmlm L WYbe. (teary IWrI Rtert. CaI. MIRt! 0. WIaYL Iattrp t111gY IetWtev C4 Rq MI L J. Wirtt UeMalat Iklt[t[wlb a/CJYa D. M. Wrlr KI Aetttka IK Rtp. YIPA IIf7 [MY II. 71rIbLK AMILIb AYtYDt ]plb• tb Ce. Rtr. VFSA IMifnn i 3~ C[R10.yCL 4Ea L Al1YL F.mry Mum.l RMeece Cary. ~,IIXCWe w W E. w~la+l DM a Oe~ Dow Cn.mnL Ce. IAlumeu m 1 1. D.ROa r e.r [. [.Wr. learrw R~r room. ~Aluma a K w 4edar onN n. E.ra Cm~n ra fin Rer.Re ,nnrt;'a w D W.Iwel RY.ad R FM~Iq y.d Fin SpneWrt 4m. •:M.a. ~o w ram Cwwr.4 Laml.l lndrt.nrM laeonbnn lec H¢mu. w 4 1 DorOlel LJnv L (.aq L'eda+ntm Ueonwna of Cr• Yd1 I,Irtnano R. 1. wnee0 canR v. tYrwR xaex com. i Allem.W w ~, N. YWrI Re1rwE D. NrM. AmMw Fln S/netlrt Aua. i,6rteW io a!. Gm, r 1. L .N.eae..h ~'.Y. R..rnE CoeoN ~AlwrYa b 1. K RwheNSl N.~r N. VIYwLL Novell t l.rmee Annnev Hneyb io L G O' Vedll imM. J. YINrM416u~nr Kolr Co. i+lumYn m E. ]. SamET.rrl la.M e. W.ea s. TuYa.o. re. D./r. IAlnmm w E. C. E.anl O.reY W. oTY.rr Smine.r [oporny com. uaraaw w C. W Senumrtl l..a EesYL rn. vinry cem. IAltmun ro C. Eua.al NeT Sees. IsLL A.ros o! FLT Cann IAhaea. m W Drvld Xilbel leek T1rYa. Al1Y WbeWnc SRnvWr Co. IAlamr.m L Lmewrmuel LY vraaaL YM Selreme Com. IAltanq w T. G. Durl lee E. VMie, XA 7pneYta. lee. IAItrtW. m w. Umpisl WREea ti W.ea EoN Imwe 3 Alba.na 7K. IAlrara m a x lryr Ywaller Sdee./ L E.IeYk Xeeea AeaC w11Wea L 4Y iaEM A.aL Rq. Cerrrar r SWq m I.IA. /w/ S4 [ee, romrtl0 M Sl.tm SEYn~r11[Ee a ANMEIW O[nreE[M JW G. dNN, Olanr. Del-Y1m.t 1 Aamrr lee 4en'E L Wd NY/w Artoc f/M a Cea/eb EairE. AE..rr/ 1eneYrr Co. ix laew a Or1Ya twrL Ar d Nae. Eulrn EkYA L N.Ee.i.lW Cwr~asY EdY 7/wrer E.lee hdi RII.Yr Iw./.s G key.O.A E.4 IePl.f ebul Eerree Car. cw a G.wab uw.waat LMrwr lr. E.ea. a SY~L MrIM SMI Li.iw OrY IYlebra MR.Ylees FN EVrlawr Lams rn.w J. L E4EArq M Evert! Co.W dceew Nall ~.1a1 As- a M Cob 1, tw Era vs M ArErturw W'EY {. O[i WiarE M rrraraias Efwr Ca. leR Wpm lri If.rMr Dfoq Wlpe~ A MH. ERy J.we sM Arp IC lEl. tla rgsro W aeMwoq/ a M over rM Caearna w+h'I.eN wW an e/n4. i1rr+ Sra+LRa one. rhayro w W ea"~RSI'rt4 Ar..uemuL VOlS: Wasrtrlr ^z x Csa.r~ reD .a n eM d mN ttewllYr r ..dararl d rM ,u«wYr a w deerear aml.ReE A W Cararm. r .e.a Na rasa rna i 33 '~"°~° UD-J IyfidLnrlOM OF SMIVRL[lt IYfi[M MOM[. 4y0 IYORIMILY nM[LLING3 HMO 40[Ill MOMO Cowab Pnr[e. ....... .......... .... .... ..... ......... .........uo- s Chapter I Gee.[1 Iofor3eRtlW ......... .. . ............. ... 13D- s I-I Scope .................... .... .. ... ... .............. 430. s I-' Purpo3e .. ........................... ................ ..UO- 3 .J Deemuom .. ...................... .. UD- 3 1-3 D<xlyn and InsulLUOO .......... ~ ...... , . ~ ........ ... ...170. 6 CMptn 2 W~ur SflMy ...... ................. .................170. Y ?-I GenenlPronuom ........................ ... ............ ..Up- 7 14 Wucr Supply Sources ...................... .................U0. Y ]-7 Nulnpurpose PiPtM SY3tem ... ........ ..... ........ ..........U0. 7 .-s NobOe Hame Weser Supply........ • ........ ........ ~ ... ~ ....110. ckspro7 sY[[a co.rr..b ................... .................uo- Y 7-I V[Ivp sod Druns ...... .................. .................Ito- 7 7-2 Preuurc Gya ....................... .... ................ .It0. 7 7.7 Pipm{ ................................. ............... ..UD- t 7.1 Pipmi Support ........................... .................110. 1 7.7 SPrinklm .............................. .................110. 8 7-6 Alums ................................. .................UD- ! n.w[ ~ sY[r. u.aa ........................................Ilu. e al Dni~n Cri[ms ..................... . .....................I7D- ! a2 Pmt[ioe of Sprioklm .......................................110. 9 al System typo .............................................110. 9 a.~ Pipe Siaxy . ............ ............................... .I)D-10 as Pipio{Coo6{unriom .. .....................................110.11 a6 Lacanon of Spriokkn ..................................... .11D-II CbNn S Rs/sse3lsN PNIkasMr . ..........................1lU-12 APMNIx A .................................................. .11D-11 :p~[Nls R Whnscsi PNRLwIus ................................13D-I! INes .................................................... ... .1JD-19 GE~fRAL IM1fORMAfiov t30.s VFPA 13U Standard for the [nstallatioo of Sprinkler Systems in One- and TwaFamily Dwe111nQs and Jlobile Homes 1989 Edltloa ~OTICE~. +n asansk;•;follow;na the numbtr pr lever deslgu• nt + W n{upn ;nd;cmet esplanalory maenal an IMt Parayaph In ippendu a I nionnauan on referenced pubhcauom can be (nand In ChaPUr `. and Appends a, Preface U u intended [Mt tins sundard provlde a method for Ihase mdtvlduals wnhsn8 to Imoll a spnnkler syfl<m far aadnwnal hfe safety and property protemton. !t Is not the puryou of mu sundard to regmrc she msWlation of an automau< spnnkler syncm. Thu sundard aaumes shat one or more smoke detectors will tx mswltd in attrordatlce wtlh VFPA %a. Smndard (or the fnsmllauon„tlamrrnanrr. and Ctt aj Houaeha/d Fvr sskrmn~ Egwpmrnl CAapw 1 General laformtlw I-I• Scope. Thn sundard deals wnh she denpn and m• stallanon of amomanc spnnkler systems (or prolemlgn agtmt Inc hre harards In one• and two-family dwelling and moDlle homes. Id• Pbrpose. The purpose o(thit sundard is to provides spnnkler syncm shat will asd in the detection and control of restdennal fire and Ihus provlde improved protection agmv mlury, hfe loss, and property damap. A spnnkler sysum mstallcd ro aLeordanee enW via standard a expect- ed to Drevem Baslsorer Itow ievWvtmenn m the room a( firt onpn, when spnnkktM and u improve the chance for occupanu to escape Ix be evaLwted. Gmdehnn aro enaMisheO for the dnipt and imwluion o(spnnklet fystema file acre- and two-f~mtly dwelling and monde homes. Nghltq in thin standard is Imended to reitnCt flew itchMkfsiee nr 3N[^2L• irranbF.T:en:a pio:rd• m8 the level of satiny prexnbM M' the sundard o not lowered. IJ• [ABaitbas. AryeovN. A<cepuble to the "awhonsy havm8lurisdic• non.' VOTE: TM venonal Flrc Protenlon Asavnuson don Irot approve Impwt or ctndy spy msWUtrom, procedures. rqutpmmt. ar muenau nor don n approve a ev4wu Innnt labanlonn. In demrmtmn{ me accepabdny Pf ;nstaluuons or prortdurn. mmpmmt oI malMga IM amhanty hay ma tun W Icbon may DaN uceptanc< on com- glance wnh VFPA or mher appmpNte sundard+. In th< abun<t of such tuoduds, faltl aumpmy may repave ev;. dente o(proper msW talon. procedure or uu. The aumon:y AanN lunWlnlon mar also refer so me Ilnmp or bbclmp graven al an orgmtvlon cvnnmed wsu produn o alw- uom whRn u m a pmumn to dmermm<compnance won appropnau vandutlf for me current pfodn<lmn of lumd Hems. Authanry Harioa Jonsllctlaa. The "aushnnty having lunsdsnlon" Is the orpmzauon, ofice or mdrvldua! re >ponssbie for'approvmlt' egwpment. m msutlanon or a procedure. vJTE: TAe phrase "awhonrv havmplunsdmupn's uud m 9FPA documenn Iv a broad manner note lunsd;alons antl °approval" agvcm vary a do Ihar respamlblhnn. Wnere pubbc u(ery a pnmarp she "amhvrny oar mp;uw d;mm~" may be a (edenl. Hate. IocU or other rq;pral department ar IvNrlduL inch v a firt cNe(. lire manual. tout o(a firt prcvmnoo wrnu. labor tlepanment. hml6'r depenmmL bwldmp o18csal, elmnW mtpeaor. or omen havlna memory audwnry. For mwrena Purposes. an Imur• antt Impemwn depanmeeL rum{ burnw or other ;nwr• ants company rtprtxnutrve mq be the "wthonly Mviy lunsdscuon:' to massy csrLVmsurlcn the propny owner or ms dnsgaud agar auumn IM mu of sM ^authonty MqM lunfdlnton'"', a pverommt maWWsoea sue com• musdsry o6ur or depanmevW omcW may betas "autMr• ny Mnnp {unidtmoa:' CUeek Valve. A valve which allows Bow in one dlrecnon onto. Catral Velw.• A valve employed to control Ishuq a wpply o(water to a 1Pnokltr syncm. Dealp Dleckar~e. Rate of wamr dlscharfed Dy an auto- matte spnnkln expressed m Ballons per minute. Dry Systw A system employin8 amomauc spnnklen attached so a Ptplnd sysum conusnme au under atmos- phenc or nigur prcuures. Lou o(pmsurc Crom the bper.• m8 of a ipnnkkt or detmton of a fire copdiuon causes me release of waur into the plpm8 rynem and out the opened spnnker. , DssaWq. Any buildiod wnich conuins noI more roan one or two "dvne11ie8 wiu" intended Io M used. rented, leased. let of hind out to be ottupu0. or whsch are occupied (or Mbiutwa purposes, Dtreltly l;atl. Ooe or more rooms amnpd for the use of one or moo indivtdESals Iiviss8 :opthcr v .o a s,n8ie hduttktepin8 unst. normuly MvtnB caokind, IivtnB, sani- tary, and skepm8 (atiliute. I~ke1M. Equipment or maunW to which has been anached a hbN. symbol or oche ideaufyin8 muk of an orpmmton uceputrM to sot "awhonty havm8lunsdtc• von" and costcensed wnh product evtlwtion. she man- ume penodic inspection of produnson of labeled egwp• ment or matenala asW by whose Iabehn8 the mar..iaaurcr mdlntp compliance wuh appropnate sundards or penar• mane[ so a specsM1N manner. Listed, Egwpmtnt or muenals Included m a hn ,puD- hshed by an ogattszauon accepubie w Inc 'uu;nont. 35 .,ntR.aa 00.6 IVTa LIU:OV Oi Snl\al[a SYSTE.NS IV 0~ F aY0 L`aVFSMILT DW[LLI VGS yYD NOaILE NOM[5 having JunSdinioe" and <un<emed hon. rho mamums periodic ms with produn evalua- Lsted egmpment yr muenals and whose hs m js amle her that th<equipmem or marcnal mews apprapnate sundards or has Deen :esmd and tbund sortable for use m a spembed manner \oTc ih< mearo 'or dentua tit I~slea rpul mens may an .or earn egmirvmn : p ven. some of Wn¢n Jo •,at ur m d '.m prndua <wlua- -nuv n ualso ubeled The ~ a,a c9mre eD,uiDment a lured mould uuhxe me stem emDloyeO Dy me In,mno ¢iton" lion to ide.^,u(v a uved ,r. 1 rganm• Muc:. Mobile Holne. A factoryasumbled srrutture egwpped with. service connections and made so u to be readdv mouble as a unit on rts running gear and denped to be vud as a dwelling unit wrth or wnhow a foundation. sa'msrlkw Uer•ator. An eleeene signatin{ indicnor ar alarm check valve anua[ed by water dow in one ]uecuon only. N'n lywem. A nnem employing amomaric sprinklers anacned to a piping system conummg water and connected io a water supply so that wamr mscharg<s immediately from spnnklen opened by a fire. H' )laimmeacs. Th< owner a responsible for :he con- dnton o(a sprinkler ostcsn and stall keep me system in normal open[m{ coMnion. 1•! Deaip aM luulkska. I-0.1 berlces aea MatMW. 1-l11• O 1 ~lutripurpose Plpiag Svsrems. Piping systems wuh ' n y new midential spnnklen shall be employed 'n the mssallauon of spnokler svstems. ~~ in dweilings and mobile homy intended to serve both domes- ~~~~ ~'~ ~ iic and fire protecoan needs. .1.7 Only fisted and aPDroved devices and approved / marcnals shall b Prern{lnrrrM System. A Wc4a{ed sprinkler sYStem im cludm{ a!I co e used in sprinkler synems. Escepnan: Leong maybe waived for ranks u h mponenu connected to the woof supply desyned m M ms[alled a tl . p mps, ang- err. warb((ow detection darcrJ. and warrrliow va/vrs ccor m{ to pretested limitations, . ~~~ ~ Poor{• A mechanical device that tnmfen and/or raises the preaure of a dmd (waterl ~~ het uomr wR~itn heidve ysntens ~llbe[p~t y~ AnetA~ 0~ . t1 labontones when listed. ~ Resihadd Spdnk4n. An mtomnu sprinkler which ~Id.1.P All sriums dull be resod for leaka{e a has Deen spenhcally listed (or use In midemial occupan• ems rystem opemmg warm ptnsurc Shell. Indla[es a mandatary regmrcmenL Enrpnon: When a far drPanmrnr pump[r conrtxuon is ProvsdM, hvdrosranc prrnurr trio sha(! br rav d d p r r m va5'roMancr wish .vPPA H. Standard for the /nrrallaucn ur advised but not required `~V ~~~°cumnon or that whicA a ~ ~~_^~~~t~ ) li Ualb, Metric emu of meawrcmeot in shi Sprinkkr-{urometk. A fire wpprcuion devitt which operun automatically when n h t standard fit! in ucordance with slit moderoized metric system nown of ~ Inrcmatiossal l f s eao-apwted element a hated to or above lu thermal n ysnm o Uom (SI1. Two emu hi and liar), outside of but reco nn{ albwtn{ water to ducnarge over a specific area. ~ ptatd by !I, are rnm• Y used m mmroauonal Erc protretron Theo otitis . arc listtd is Tabk I-6 wttk roevrnr..• r....._ Sprie4kr System. An mte{ntetl system of Dieing mn- netted to a water supply. wnh listed spnokkan that wdl automatically imtime water dis<harp over a M1n eRi w'her. raquaed, the spnnklenyuem also inL•ludn a comrol salve and a device for actuating ao akrm when set sygem apentes. SuMard. ~ document conteitipg only maademry Drip, vision mmg sae word '•sha11^ m iedigts ngwnmsnu. Eaplanatory marcnal maY be ltscduded aNy in the ftsrm of "fine nrinr" „_.••, ,n fe.'taasai, sn io an A pprndia ~rNy Preeten. Prcssurc wishin the mDNY (i.e., city or private supply water sourcel. Syttam Pnenre. A pretture within Ue syrtam (i.e., above xhe comrol velvet. Wtarllow hksrm. A sounding devise activntd by a warcrdow eesenor or alarm cheat valve and amngsd to sound an alarm that wdl be mdible m all living arw over bukground nolu leveh wnh ail intervenor{ daon ckssed. Taale Ii Ytma of I.'e4 L'•k 9ywael Camwwae haw film purl ~ I W - s re! c e bar ~ I Da . b w.rsy h ~ ~ I pY • 0.n6g9 bar 1bw•IESh For arwfwael xa ~ ~= aria ~.s:, s .Vmir Asatan. ..i sw nsrist la10. Ar•wn//•• 1{.1 If a value for meuurammt u givto in Chit standard it folbsmd by u equivakns value is other uain, W Ent silted is to be regatdad at We rcquisemms. A ergo equiva• lees value may be approaimete. 1i.7 The mnvmioe procedure for she SI units his been ro multiply the quantity by the mevenwo favor and then round the molt ro the appropnare numMr of sipiflcant digiu nw.mm ~ 3Ca w,tta urrtr svsrsw cowrovevn 1J0.r Chapter 2 W~tn SaPPIy '-r Genoel Prorisiom. Eery ausomauc spnnkler scssem snub ha.< ao :eau one aummabc water supply. When stored water s used as the sole source of supply, the mmtmum quanun snarl equal the water demand rase rimes IO mm• vUS iSre +.l 11 2-2• salver Supply Sources. The follpwmg warm supply sources are xccepwbie: gal a connection so a reluble waver works system. ibl an elesamd tank. in a pressure Dank msulled in accordance wuh YFPA I }. Standard 'br me /nstallauan of Sprmk/n S,vsrrms, and ~FPa ]J. Standard rot uhrer Tankr J'or Pnvare frre Prarn- ncn. idl a stored water source wnh an automanglly operated pump. 2-l• )talNpsupoat Plplsq Sytteaa A piping system urv• mg both spnnkler and dampnc needs dull be acceptable when: lal• In common water supply connemiom urvm{ more thsn one dwelhn{ unn. S gem (19 Umml a added to she spnnkler system demand w dctenntns the size ofrnmmon ptpm{ and the ftze of the total carer supply rtgmrtments. Ibl Smoke detmon art provsded to accordancz with YFPA 7a, Sandard !ar the Insra(tanon, .1larnrenanrr and L1 r of NouJehold Ftre sparnme fqurpmtnr. KI all pipet{ m tAe system con(onm to the piping specificauom of thu sandard. '"' °=•-.~~. ' ~. rim iacat plumDm{ or hea1N authontf 2• NoNh How Wear SapRly. A water suPPly (or a spnnklered dwelling manu(amurtd od-site shall not De less than shat specified on she manutatturtr's nameplate. ISrr tl Jrdy E.rreprmn. ~ Chaprn l 5yew co.pw..n 11 Vehef W DraiM. 11.1 Each synem shall have a siryle rnntrol valve ar• ranged to snot oRhot6 the dotnenie arsd spnnkler systems. and a separate shutoR valve (a the domenic system only. £.crrpuon .Va. 1; 7N spnnMrr syrrtm prprne may hour a Jepororr conrrd sssfw where xnpmrxrd by osy of rhr fa(law. trap ma;htric tar Cenval narmn. proprlnary, a mnorr uarlon alarm senrrr. rb/ Loral alarm srrvrcr rho( wdl catur rhr taunding of an audrblr ngnal ar a ronsranlly arrrndrd pant. or '<! Cmksng sAr valve oprn. frcrpnon .YO. 1' dsrparorr rhurodvdlwunor rrgtstrrdfor rhr damnnr Warn Jupply rn mulrrpurpotl piping rysrems. 11.2 Each spnnkler system shall have a'h in. I I J mm) or later dram and snt connMmn wnh valve on the system side of tAe comroi valve. }IJ 4ddnionN dmm shall be tm[Nled for each trapped panron o(a dry synem which a suDlett ro (rttxtng temp<r- amrn, }S Prr+aure Ceara. }2.1 A pressure gage sMll be metalled to mdmaU air prcuure on dry systems and on water supply preuure tanks. }J Piping. }J.t Papem moe used in spnnkln svstemsshall be of the matenals m Table 3-). I or in accordance wnh )-) 'through 3•).5. She chemical propenms. physmal propenms. and dsmrnstom of the matenals lured m Table 3.3.1 shall be u Iran eGWValent to the sundards cued m the sable and datgncd ro wtmstlnd a workuq oreasure of not less than 175 Ms (12.1 Dar; 1. TeW }J.1 _,Netxiey W gwrwn Srrr..a ' spenhcatoe (ar WeWed aW ` Seamlw SUN Ptpe aSTN aS) Wmugpt•Aaet Pipe A`!iI B36 ioM Spmhcauone (m Ekctrtc-Resistance Welded Suel Rq ASTN A l is kYl m T o Sp Bca Uan t Seam4r upper Tube ASTN B7S ~ ~W ~ C t asn T aSTN Bae SpersAeauon fm General enu (m Wtwgt Seem4Y Cow ~ Cooper-Allen ma.. aSTN BSS: BUaiis{ Filler MeW ICWUaeanon BCUP•7 m BCuP•1) aW5 AS 9 Spaiifotton fm Soldn Me W. i 93-J rtimApumopyGrade 9)TAI 15TH 8J2 17.2 Other type of pipe or tube may be used, but only shoo mvpuptM dad IinM (or thu servtsx by a radon{and insptxtsoo agexy laboratory, 1J.J Whenever the word pipe a used ie tMs standard. it sM11 be underftood to aW mean tube. 17A SehaduN 10 Waal pipe may tie joirstd with mahano- cal groove coupliep approvM for service wnh grooves rolled on tM pipe q' as approved groove rpllin{ mtthinc. 1J.g Fninp tstad in sprinkler sywms shall be of Me mstenala littad in T~bM }),! or in atxrordsisce wnh ]4.7. The cAsmigl properliu, pkyual propenla, and dimen- aiom of the maOnaU lured ie iabk 1J.2 shall be at lent equivalent to the sunduds stittd in the able. Fitnnp used in spnnkler systems shall bt dni{ned to wimsund the working Dresaurp involved, but Dos lass Nun 175 psi 112, I bang cold water pmwn. 1).t )Dino for tAe rnnneetion of capper tube shall 6e broad. E.«rpuon~ Soldmd/oma rpt•J solder maall mas~ hr tnrd far we•plp roppn rube ;careens. Z IJ0.6 M1SAItn(104 Of SII11"alfR SYntNS ~~ OBE. ND ra[1h411Y W ILIIYGa aND 4plt! NOMU T~Nr ]J.! ~InMaL aN nimenEwm Snxaara can Iron pu Iron ihreotled Fe:mn. Clan Cana ];0 +d5l nibs Ga Iran P~.tx F~anen and Flanged F::.nga AVSI BI6 1 Nalleaple Iron Nailelble Iron threaded F~tnnp. Class I!0 one ?Od +h51 BIb ) $leel --,rude wrouam 51n1 c~ Bwtweld f~~tilnp +V6I BI6.9 lunue!ding Enef for Plpe. Rahn. Flange. and Fnbnp +N51 BI6'J Spec for P:pmg Potunry of W4ought Cutwn Steel and olio! !real for 1lodenm antl Elevaed Tempenmrn +STN +?la P:pe Flanges and Flanged Flmnp, betel v'ICkel alloy and ONer lpKW Alloys . . 6uSi BI5.3 Foged $rnl nntnp. Socket We1dA one Threaded +VSI Blt.l l amblcnt cnhng mmpenmm an betweep 101 antl 130'F 179 and 68'Cl. 1S.a The following pn<ncn shall be obarved when msnllmg remdenual spnnklen, unlns mazsmum expected amblcnt IemprnNlH in OLnCM'rfr dtterrrllOrd. lal spnnklen under glass or plane skysi{hts exposed tD direct rays of the sun shall be of mlennedute temperature cluslficanon. Ibl spnnklen In an unventilated concealed space under umrtsuUttd roof, or :rt sn us:YCSdated acne, shall be of I mtermednte umpensure ctassifi<anon. 13.5 Operated or dame{ed spnnklen shall be rrplurd wnh spnnklen havsng the time per5onnantt chuanensucs u onynal egwpment. }3.6 Ptilmag W OraaPteW FIsIsM. 15.6.7' Sprinkler fmm~ mry be factory painted or enameled u omamenul finch m attordanpe wstb }3.6.2: osheEwlse sPnnkim shall not M painted and any spnnklen that Mve been punted. exttPt @r factory applied coassnp, shall be replaced wnh ntw bsted spnnklen. topper }5.6.3 OmamenW finishP shay) nos M appied to sprio- W rougnt copper ana Copper +noy $old<r)blm Pmsun flnmp ~ +v51 B76 2: ki<n by anyone oshp than she s nkler maaufactunr, and fi only spnnklen listed wnh such lobes shall M uxd. Case CoPPn +Iim SoldenJomt Pmsun Flnlnp au51 BI6 ! }S.t When naameWGC sptiakk:r criliag plate ftavaM ~~r~~ „} ^ `~~~w~ I eans)or:ecessM esclncheom fineWlie or nonmeWiic)arc used Ney snail ise listed Eased oo tegta oflM »sembly a a ~),7 Other npn of fimnp mar be used. but only inns! ^, ~ reudenual spnnkip. nresngaled and tined for Ihn xrvue EY a calla{ ands ,~ Inspection agency Uborasory. Alums. IACal wattrgow alums mass s..~~':'~,,.,;,r,l ~ ~`,~•\~~ .n-`_-'. z gems. J-a Pipint Saaoon. r-~•~~ ~~ 7 Exnpuon.~ Owd/lags or mobifr pomp haemasmokrdrrrc- ~ )•1.1 Plpmg shall be supported from uruaunl members von m a[rordanr~ w«h ,VFPA N. SfaMOrt1 Joe rhr 1mfNlo- unng support methods comparable so those regmnd by con, .Naarmaue, and L'x of Nourrhdd Ffrt Warning Ideal plumbing coda. ~ EqulpmMr. Escepuon Llsred prprnq shell be suppanrd In acrordarlre ~, N «h aril' Ls«nq nm«auons. Cbatgr a Syaelsa Du1P N.2 Plplne laid on open Jmsu or n(ten shall be accred to prevent laurel movemens. 1! Siginklan. 13.1 Usted resldcntlal sprinkNn shall M ulgd. The basin of such a listing shalt M trW to agabliah the ability of tM spnnklen to conceal msdemial gtea under atandardiged het uv condmoro. the sundardiasd room Meg >h41 M hued on a roldcnual array of (umiebirtp and gniaML Errepeon l'o( Resrdrnrrd rpnnk/pyskalt nor ba niFdm ,~.r~ si iirmr tin%SSS .•~. r iiJlld/Ol loaf pM/paJf. Eaepnon So 1 'LUled~dn~ spnnklen mop M sued m aaordaur 4«k r•J J }5.3 Ordinary mmgnmm rated midmtid spdnkkn (173 to 1'0•F 137 to 77•CI( shall be snaWltd when moo- mum ambmm ceding lempenmres do nos exceed 100'F Og'Q. }!.J Inumudnte rated msdemlal spnnklen (17S m TS'F 1'9 w 107•Cq shall M instilled when maRSmum 41 Oaalga Cdtasfa. 41.1 Delp Dhcknrgl. The ayaum shW provide a dis <hage of nos less thin Ig gpm Ibg Umin) to Iny style opentmg spnnkkr arsd tins less thae I) gpm µ9 Umin1 Pn spnnklar to the numbp of sldtgh spnakktn. IFf.S• `(slmM d Owlp SplakMn. TM numhu 9f dr ssgn spnnklen shall snelssdt x11 sprrk'~cz WalA:n awtnpan• msns ro a mwmum o(two spriokktn. bl.l.l TM rkheitioh of wmpanmeas to ssr is 41.2 to determine she number d(dnspt aprshkkn it g apace ihu U ~omplttely eneloaN ray walla and a ailitq. TM compart- rnent enclown may have opmilga so ap W' ain~ apace It t x openinp Mve a minimum IintN dapch of I io.130) mini ham tM rnliop 41.J Warr DaasaM. Tht water demand for the systsm sMll be deunnlned by muluplytlsg IBC dnl{tt dlseMrp of a .I D,v the number of dmgn spnnklen of 413. SYSTCw 41.1 S~riakkr Cmenlw 41.1.1 Resldenual spnnklen mall be spaced so shat the mavmum area protected by a single spnnkler Dots not er;eee Ui sa (I 1171 m'1. i-rii the maaimum instance between spnnkiers shall nos ee: ecn ! ] R ~J ' m! on ur txsween ptpehna and the mason win isunce ;o a LLall or parnu0n shall nos exceed 6 ft •1 d m; The minimum tlissance between spnnklen wnNn a compartment shall be d It ~_`.i ml. 1.1.3 Thr m!e:mp^ opennng pressure of any spnnkltt shall be in accordance wOh the fisting mforma4on of the spnnkler and provide the minimum dow rata spanfied m i.l I i-1.6 ~pphcauon rams. design areas. areas of <OVerage. and .mm1 mum dingo c rcnures Other than show spenfied m 1-; I, 1-I :. a-I i, and yl,< may be uud with spenal spnnklen which nave loco fisted for such spttlfic rnld<n• ual mssallau0n condmons. Y2 Positba o/Sgnekkn. 1.2.1 Pendent and upright spnnklen sMll be posmoned so That the d<Oenon arc wnhm : w 1 m.123.i so 102 mini from the ceding. E.mrpnonr Sprcsal rencenndl tprrnk/ra shill br sntrdlyd m dccordan[r wuh Ihr LJtmd ltmuanOm. 1.2.2 Sidewall spnnklen shall be posstionssd so chat the de0ecton are wnhm 4 m 6 m. (102 to 132 mm7 (ram me «1nng. Ettrpuprt Spm+a! rrndnrtd spnnklen shill br rrurWiad m daaordanrt wnh thr tuts sq Nmuauossi 1.2.J• dpnnklen shall be possuoned w that the rrsponu nine and dluharge are not mduly aBected by oMwcuom such as ceding slope. beams, or tight fixwrn. 1.3 sy,trm types. 1•l.s Wrt•Plp Systrp. A wet•pipt rysum shall De used when all piping a entailed in areL not subleet w freetsag. 1.1.2 Dry~Pipe Syano. W1un rysum plDmg is lasted m unheated area sublen w ftemty, a dry•pipe or mu- I Freese system shall br used. Escrpuon' GRd rfandaA ,lryaprndenr or dry adrwd! sprmklrrr myv bi amrndtd tort unheard actin nor mrrndrd /Or 1+vlnJ purpnarg 1•lJ Aatlfrww Syaaua. ~ iJ.3.i De6nlts'iS An amdeakis spurn n one employing automatic spnnklen attuhed to a ptpmg System con W mng an antlfreve sOluuon and conlMned to a watt supply. TAe annfreese .pluuon. followed by ~rattt, difchargea ImrtlMi• uely (coin spnnklen opened by a fin. 1•J.3.2' WMn U6N. The uu ol'antiffeen wlutioas shall be m con(ormuy wnh any state of local health rqulauom. ~7.J,J .{otlhnn SolWlotss. a.J.J.J.i when spnnkler synems arc mpphed by public water connauons the uu of anufnete foluhons other IMn i wrier solWSOm of pure pvicenne IC. P. or h' S P 96 S percem grade) ar propylene glycol mall not be permnrcd. Swrable glyemne.warcr and Propylene gl)<Ohwakr ma- tures are mown m Table 14.3.3.1. TrhN a. J.l.J.t aan6rrn Sosndan to M L aN i/ Po61k N'~kr a ConnwsN m Srrinkkes Saarile Freeus6 Solodoa Grmry rt Poet MeteAd Iby Sblrrl 60'F 113.6'q •f 'f GOnnne SOw Water I Ill -.5 -7E I C.P. or U3. P. Gnde' a0w Wyur l t!1 - ->fi0 70l water :,65 -W -a00 Hydwmeta Scale 104010 I :00 Propylene Glycol 'Ow water 10^ - ~ _ ] s 6Dw Water 1 OJa - 5 -_; 1 SOw Wattt ; Jal -]b -3L` +4w water I a5 -64 -Si t HYdmtNUr Seale I.0p0 w 120p I SubdsvulOro 000-I 'C r --CMneullY Fun. l: S.F -Ua1ud Soya Mumaopveu as 1R .F3.33.2 tf public wattt is nos connectsN to spnnklen. the commemally avuuble maenals indipted m Table a.7J.1.2 are swubk for use m a6u(reae solutions. ~ls.7d' An aotifteeae solution shill be prepared wnh a freezing poin[ bebw the expected mmtmum tempenwrc for the locality.'fhe specite tnvitY of the prepared anhn~nw d.u w cks:l::d Ly w isydrpmgrr with tunable scale. TrW 4)>-7,1 AssdOrrr Srktkn to M L'eN d IMIk War Ir M Caaaaena to SMrkkn s9rdee c,«na6 9eMlw Cravlry M Pries Mamas IN y'ekrl fI'p f1lA'Cl 'P 'C Glyttna 1(glycener a Wed. r Tabk 4J.J.), I Dleuyknr Glycll SOw war 1011 - I J - 23 0 a3w war L011 -2y -):8 a0w war 4066 -12 -il L HYdrcmnw Srak 1.000 m f 120 13ubdivlatom 0.00)1 Emykee Glysal blw Was 1076 -10 -:J.1 36w War 1.06) -20 -:6 0 Siw Warm I.OW 'C -i13 aw was Lo» -+o -wo HYtlrower Swk 1.000 w 1.120 1Juedirowne 00021 Psvpykn GISCW If popykw dyeol a uud. see Table .LJ J 7 I CaMUm Chknde Lb CaCls pe bOw "Flake" gal of Wane Fiat Prorecnon Gnadr' 2.17 1 167 0 - I - d AdO mrnusla laashiwr J.ll Lilz -IO -DI of spdrum bschnmau 7.19 IDI -JO -Jau '4 oe per gal whet 4J7 12!6 -!0 -7ia all !'a -aq -L1q a% 1387 -41 -a<~ 'Prat Iron massaauus <rbnM ae0 aka ~mwmwa 3G 9w.nro, IJD-Id LVSrALL+Tip< Cr SIFINYL[a STSTL4f IN ONF <Yn iWFAMILY [F'aLLl`IGS <NO Ng1(L NOMCS a.],J.e' ARYa{eayat er SYll3Y %qeg W Vahes. All E.rcepttan: When prpm;canard hvdmWicallY. ea/Nldrlon+ permitted amdreexe solutions am heavier than poet. M Ne shall be made m daa•dancr w~rh ihr methods drunbrd m point of contact lmteduel [tie heavier hgsad ~dl be below ~'fP.alJ. Smndmdfo•the fnsrallmran of5pnnkfnSY+nrr«, Inc Lghler hgwd In order to prevent d:duAOn of water Into the unhealed areas. In most cash. thu necnrurca the uu a-a.2 MIYImYe Pip Sib. i ofa ?dill )~ml drop p: pe or U-loop as illm[ra[edm Figure y7.7 a The preferred arnngemen[ a to nave [tie spnnkl<n ~ 2.1 Minimum D:pe uxe. Ineludint coPDer ptpmp shall below :he :ntedacc be~ween Ih< water and the anu(reete ~ '< m. (s9 mini. solution. E.Ynpnon: 1Lmmum stet of rrerl pipe rho!! be I m. RJ I If spnnklers are above the inlet race, a check valve with a mm/, 10 d~mml hole m the des r mall be orovidad m the v~ln. PDe i; •iooP. 'v water conrol valve and two small solution test valve shat! b< proaded as Alustn[ed In Fi{urc a},;,y, An aacpsable arrangement of a filling cup Is also shown. FwM w.m wer_ ~ w.v, ~_ ~ I IMw: C11.Y VMw WY M I I ri om:.Yw raw.. w.•len M M•w Lww nl V.Iw a 0•wf h, aww.r a ~~ Mn. I^Mw:M d i V.IM VMnalTfn ono (g"~ I aYaA .eu CTwa Y4w r=•7 I•:sa~n.w:. cl.r+.~ n.a r•p•w o.•n vrw COTE. the°n-:n. IU.B•mml hak :d tb<cnlN:k valve Nap per a needed io allow apanaon of the wlutWa dunrq a semperamrc nr and muf prtvrnt dame/ m spnnklr M•df. Fo. 3l Lava I:n •:!tmm in •a)Mam FifYn 4J.J.a vmeg•Nar of SYyp %glag are tlabew e-J.J.3• Tadag. B<forc frmzsn{ weather anh year. the solution In the entire System shall be emgied into coeva. none conumen and Drought to the proper spaciBe pavity by addm{ concenm«d hgwd u needed The mbhing solution may De used to refill the system. Yes Pipe Siting, a•1.1 Piplnl mall be s[ztd in asmel+ea with a.a.7 and +•++ I( mare Than one detip difdur{e if tequimd Isav +~/ /), IAe pipe vzm{ Proadwn !hall be tepnted far each design d~rharge. a~.J' To raze pipet{ for systems connected to a ary water supply. the (ollowtn{ approaSma[e method a ucepuble. This prtrttdum cannot be uxd for gndded or IoopN type systems. Hydraulic cal<ulatsoo praedura m accordance with Chapter 7 of NFPA I3 for {nd•type or looped Systems shall be used. la) ESnblish xystem Bow rate in accordatce with Settlon 0.I. Ibl Ckterminc water pressure in she nrcet. (cl A!IM pipe files. !d) Deduct miter preuum losses d any. (Ste Table 41 J/d/, ) fel DduLn y,euum lass for e:evatian. fBuildie{ height above street [e ft x O,aN • psi.l IBtuldie{ height abtnt tercet is rtleleff x 0.098 • bus.) If) De duet ptmure losses from the csty main to tM inside control valve by mWtiplyio{ the faL•tar from Table H, yy cr Ibl by the IoW len{tlgf) of pspe in fl Iml. (Toro Irnph iM lodes equivalent Irnph of B«iop b determined by applying Tebk a.e.](d•1 ({) Deduct preaum lobs for eioia w;d:n w_nu._ . :< uyipo{ rector from Tabk H:7(ej or Ihl by the mW ImgN in II Iml of each Size of pspe hetweea the control valve and he farther spnnkhn•. (h) Dedswe valve and 6nio{ pressure loop. Count the valves ahd Buinp from tM control valve m the faRhen sprigkler. Iktermine the equivalent knlth fa each valve atM 6«ing:s Shawn in Table a.~.3fc1 a0d add theb values 10 obtaie Ulf total CgYlVakat IeSSgth fa each pipe size. MWtiply N[• rymvaleat Irnph for each Size by the Onor from Table <ta,)ta) a ih) and total than valtrt (i) le mW'.ikvN buildioµ pep (a) through (h) thW bs repeated to nu pipiq for each Boa. U) If the remaSeieg preaan is Itb dtaa tM opeatitl{ pteswm autdifhM by dr terse{ 4WraterY fa the tpnn• klcr hero{ ord. a tethesipt h nfeebary. If this pmrsm u hSghsr [haa ryutre4 sSnalMr ptpe{ tnay br wee whee luft[htd by sacsdatroas TAW MJ(q lreff~e I.eaa~ f~aVhl BeaseaM N BerN lye. C w 178 Floe Rw . GSM mM ~ ie. IB IS le I{ IB b 28 7a H N tl N 1 oa o.o] 0,03 o.a9 0.11 0.l] 0.20 7:g o.n o.a o.3i d,31 I°< 001 001 003 0.02 0.0] 003 0.03 np3 0,10 0.12 0.13 0.19 I°: OOI OOI 001 0.01 0,01 o0S 0.02 f,07 0.03 O.Oa 6.0T 0.09 2 - - - .• _ 001 001 LOI 001 002 0.01 0.07 i•r Sl Lnm 1µ.l'11 L.I pu •n0eH Neie•o1011 m. i ~o :rrewlr, TJM uJIN Pwnaw Iswa IM/n1 foap•r Ta61aa••-Tyen L L i N. C • IA Fbw Raw - GPM reemt rrw Sia m. to I3 t1 Ib 11 30 23 b 73 M aS 31 N JOB 012 016 0.]0 0:5 0.50 016 06• OB1 - - _ l J!0 01a 01] 0.25 029 OJS 0!3 0~5 IJO - _ _ K 0:) J18 O.L Ol0 Ole Jab 069 09] I]S - - _ ]? JU: obJ o01 ocb 0.07 ece o:7 6.a o2a oJO 6)s o16 L ooJ ooa oos o06 069 0l0 o.u 62a or o)s ;:) ;5; K 607 ON OM .,,... 009 011 UI7 ON 0.J1 010 0!0 061 I N 001 0.01 0.02 0.02 00J 0.03 0.03 007 009 C.11 015 011 L 001 001 002 0.02 O.OJ 6.6J 003 00] 010 01: 016 019 K 001 COI 0.02 0.02 0.0) 0.01 006 008 OII OIJ ');' 0]0 I ci - 001 0,01 0.01 001 001 002 007 00a 005 006 009 L - 001 ODI O61 001 001 002 003 OOa 005 JU' OJ9 K - 0,01 001 0.01 0.01 OU2 062 003 005 006 OJ' OU9 _ M _ _ _ - _ 001 0.01 0,01 0.01 062 OJ2 L - - - - - - 001 001 0.01 0.01 002 OU2 K _ _ _ _ _ - 001 001 001 00l 002 OJ2 For 51 Emu l yl. •) 'IJ L 1µr • O OSa9 Ean l R • O )Oaa m TaYM M.JIeI Ee•Iralaa? Iwrar of MM I. PaN far ifM nN Capaw Pledy nN vNr Eltaw AM Vahw Fimaa/vaM Fbw Flaw GMM Mawaer IS >• Iwaa Ttrc TN -Y• le. D•oana nsOwa aaal~ Mark a~ :iw Aaals G4ta Patssn fact ftaet Y' t • I 1 10 2i II 7 ) l i i 2 s 2 I 1: 2e u a + I'4 7 3 6 2 2 IS JS le 5 5 1'h 2 • J 9 J 2 19 q 22 b _ ) S 1 in .. v 2e 9 euna on Cram ieaneual hpw ro, ilo. For rl Vm¢IR•OJON w. I ITA1r n bnW upon Wn fnawa br Mrpy1 W Mq coca ra0lweMl or IM C Fn:wr n' alaea m rM prgy) Ik) The remain?na p?pia~ shall Et sited t!u same >t the plpme ro the (anhest spnek!n urdeaa smaller SiaH arc rmnficd by calculuiom. Escrprron: for rprtnklrrMdNSllinya rnonu/arrw~M o~frre. the mrnrmum prruurc nerdW to rau%y rht rYrtrm rkat(rl cnrma on 3hr ryrtrm ode oJ2Ar loon rhal! 6r rprrrJird an a darn plan by thr manuJartsarr. (Sre Srrnon bJJ rw. wln rr~. ta.p. r M111ee Mrsara Ptwp~a [!!e !T-1: .MNw alw IO~1 a.rawl u u u JJ » 32 +n 9 ti la 36 ' ' e, a 6 9 U I J 7 1 6 IO 1'h •• l 2 2 1 1 2 •• •• •• I 2 7 VOTI. NrpMr prawn l9•n•A IppaM er tM wpaaheMar Meta Aa rllAd in pnLn Of IRoY 1pSraAa'a W raaM. {q•a1 p1a1WIa Inr• R•y Irt YYIa •Mn wganrN oW n pprww q rM MNr laaalrtanum. • 36nra murwaw nxa Ip• diwwwts aw41M elarara •'U•1 IaN 1 pw. fm SI Vmu' I qm • ? •A1 4mm; I m • 211 ww a-IA 'fo siu p?pia/ for systems wuh ao elevued unk, pump, ur pump•nek comhiruaoo, determire the preuure as the w,tttt wpply oYllet ahd Grossed lhro0lh sups lol. lel. IU• Ihl• ~ i), Ij), aed Iq of I-LJ. 43 Makr CaNaerWr. PiDiea rnnfiNrations may he I-f laelfra of S/sWlar- Spriakkn shalt he imulled In all wren. Estrprion No. f: SpNrutlm racy br ornurrd Jrom 6tuh- rmms no: z::wdlnt JS ,y Jt lJ.i rrr/ wrm nom'ombwnble plumbrnrliarurcr. EFrcprron No. 1; Sprlnklen may M omirrrd Jrom rmall cloFm wMr tM (rNr dlmsssston don rrW racrrd ] Jr r0 9 mi and rhr ams don nor rFrr/d 11 k/r 12.1 rnrJ and the wWU and ceJin~::' arc rwJarN wrth norttombwnbir or hmurd combwnM/ maena4 a dr;/tru'd by NFPA STO. Standard ort 7ypn o/Butldin( Conrrrurrurn. Esnpnan Nn. ): SpNnWnr mat br omurrd Jrom {onto. opn arta[hnl poahrr, carpp'nJ. arrd rtmrlar rrructurcr. £xaprron .YO a' Srrnnk(rvr may be amntrd !mm urns pMeswr crawl rpacrt. and arhn roncralyd rpacn rMi an not wed a1 :mmdrd far lrvrng purporn ar rromgr. f.rrepaon AH J Spnnk/rrt may be amerced from emrancr rov¢rz :hat art nor rh< on(v mram afegnu r _~ f~ Cheerer 3 ReRrenrN Punliatlwa 3-i Thefollowmg documentsarpomomthereofarereter- enced wah:n this standud and shall be coosrdered pan of -cremcnts of 1h1s aocument. Tbc edition :adicated for each relercncc 1s the current <dmoa at of the d]te of the SFPA issuance of the document. 5-LI vFPA Pobliatkns. ]anonai Fire Protemion Asso- nation. Banrrv march Park, Qwncy, NA 02269. ~FP4 13.1989. Standard far the fnrmllaLOn ojSpr+nk/n I Suum+ ,V FPA ]2.1987. Srandard,lor Warn Tankr/a Aivan fire Prarnr+on VFPA 'x•1989. Standard !ar rhr /mrallarion..Narnrw 1 name, and Ge of Howrhald Fire Warrtmg Equrpmenf ~'FPA 2261987. SrandaM un Tvpe+o/Bw(dind Contrrur• non. ii.2 Otbn Loan aN SbNarla. Si.l.l ANSI Pabllgrlou. American National Standards Institute. Inc.. I x50 Broadway `few York NY 10018. A ~'SI B I B. 1.1975, Carr /rot Po'pr F/anpt and ffangad f~u:ngr. C!atJ 2J. l'J 270 aria 800 ANSI 816.7-1983, .Ila(lrabtr Iron Th/Ndrd Firrinp, .°larr lfn nwA +rvi ANSI Blb.~s-1987, Catt lron Threaded Fiuin;t. C/atrn .! and 270 .+.ti'SI B 16.5.1981. Pepe f(angeY and FlanBW Firrinp ANSI BI6 A1986, factory-.Nadi fYrwBhr Steal Burh w ldmg Rr(rngr A ~Si B i 6.11.1980. forged Srre' Firrinp, Socket. flQeldirrg on: Thrmatd A N51 B 16.18.1984, Cart Copper' Alloy SoWe Igru Prra tune Funngr A v'sl B 16, 2 n_• 1980, WroygAr rapper and Copps Allay Solder lame Pgrrwr Fiume > a5t BI6.:'.-1986. Bwlwfldb~ 3rrdt 4NSi 836.IOM•1988. N4/Id rid Sromleas Wrought Srrel Prpr '.-. 2,2 ASTti Paiir+nou. American Sonm7 fa TeninB and Maenals. 1916 0.xe Strees. Phiudalphq. PA 19103. ASTM AJJ•1987. StandardSpmtfa'mran/aPipe, Seed. Bark. and Hor-Olpprd. ZinnCoarrd 1pddM and Smmlav SuN P pr ASi3d AIJJ-1986. Sandard Spergiranon for flerrnc• Rnmarre- Ri/drd Sad Ptpr ASitvl A2J0.1987, Aondard Spmrfirntwn /or Rpnr fir. ungr o/ '4'.ou8hr Carbon Srn! and Alloy Srtrl (ar ,NOdrrare artd flrvarrd Timprmlum ASTM A793.198J, Sperfranon Jor Bark and Hor- Dipptd Zrrtt~roartd We/dtd and Smm/pt Stnl Ap lest Fart P•arnrton LTe ASTM 832.1987. Standard Sprnficarton for Soldo .Nrm(. 9J-f rTi n-Annmany-Grady 9JZ1/ 45TH 8734981. Sranda•d Spenfuanan Jor Seam/at Copper Tubr 45TH 888-1986. Standard Speu/rcanon for Seaml<tr copper warn rube ASTM BI3LI987. Standard Spm(htmton far Qrnr•a! Rrqurrcmrnrr for sf4oughr xam/ru Capper and roPper• Alloy Tube ASTM EJ80.I986. Smrtdard for.Nentc Pmrtttr. S•1.2~AW5 Peblkatlw. Amencaa Welding SOCmy. 530 YW' Leleua<ROad. Miemi, FL 3J 137. AW 5 AJ.B• 1981, SprctfRanon /or Bm:mg filler ,Neral. AMaalix A Tb+ 1ppMt+ +nw a pert of gar gwrrnvw o/+hu.vfpA Ionunrm. lw u.w, . ,for alwrwuw peers oNr A•1.1 NFPA 1 JD is appropnak for ttse protection epiap 6rc hanrds oily is now arsd two-family dwNtiap and mobik homes. Itmideosial poniov of soy otber buildia8 may be protened wiN rnrdential spAokkn ie accordanca with 3• I i 29 of NFPA 13.1989, Srdnderd fa (hr /wd/a• uan oJSprrnWn SyJrmu. Other portitms of such budding shoWd be protettad in axrotdand wiN NFPA I ). lire criteria io Nis aaMrwS _.. !~ ,;,, ;uii•YCare ore reau o1 rooms toaworo8 typid Pomisbietp touod io rnsdeatw livia8 rooms, titcbsnf, and bedtmms. T W fiu- nishinp were enaaBW n typically touatd a dwetlin8 uniu is a manner srmrlu to Nat shots in FBurea MI •IIa). Ibl~ sad (c). Sisry fail-apse err tms wen conducted in a two-story dwNliaB in lox Aapla, falifanu and 18 eau wen conducted in a le•11 (l mm) wide mobile holm is C'haAoste. Nonh Carolina. Speinkkr sypema desipad and iNWkd atcordin8 b ilk nandasd art eapamN b peevtat 9uhovn wimio the oomtsanmeat ofoeiOa if spriokkn arc inwlled m the compartment. A spnekkr system dmplcd and imwkd aaoediey m Ihle standard pram. boawvsr, be completely expected to pauW ^ 8n iovolvia8 unusually hi8hsr averap fuel IarIN lhan typical for dwelho8 uosu 1 f0 pi 10. T w!I sad when the in4fior Said hn ao unusuyly hyls Baeat ryseed min818tates Wes 323). For prmectron of mnltihm0y de211irtp. seler to NFFA i 7. Gand2M fx :lee :Nwfotton aj J'pnnWer Synrmt, m NFPA 1 JR. Srandetd fa rM lneWlmiw of Spnnkfn Syr• krN m Rntdrmrd QtripartH uP re F0w Spann m Hrrghf. A•I.2 laeele of PMettlw, vuiow kwle of brceafeey an avukbk to dwellin8 orzupou m provide sits ufety and ProWRY protecuoa This staodaro rocommend4 but don rep rspuirc, spnn• klme8 of all areas 1n a dwelliaF is pesmsu spnnkkn to be omrttm m renarn area. These arw art tM anti shown by NFPA natuun (tea Table A•L1/all to be Ne ones whore the ~M lei s ~~' a•a.e~ MoMr• I:om• e•aarn t N ~M /w~• 4 Ser nrrn a e•a cw c„ru~~. Ne N••e care 0 Ornrr N N~wrliwM cN a•v terra Fm SI Vnro~ i m ~ :! • mm. FI~A•I.4t) M11ua lr.+nyresn S Iputpn Q lpr~ntl•I cw arum. 0 Or.s. C ain. e ue far el Vms I rd . 31.• un Fyen MI-t1Y1 NMIM !Iw• Mrww /-!M T•p• pY-Cur!wn• l • lMM Q . SelrnMlH T•I fl UeNK I n.. Se.• n!el. II/w A•Id(q U•Ip Ma ~3 IlD-I/ I\A6U110V 7P flnltiRLq fYST+Mf IM ONF AVn Tw?FAYRY nw1LLlyGf nnn VOrL! NOar innde0tt of life lou from fires in dwnllinp is law. Su<n an Gwdantt (or iasnllasion of smoke daee[on a0d flrc aPP+oegh produen a nasonabk decree of firefak[y. Grcao- de[mlon sys[ema maY be found in NFPA 71, Srandord (or er pro[ettton ro both life .±d Property wdl be achmved by rhr fn+ra//anon, b7amrnance. and L'+e e( Howeho/d fm spnnkl<nn/ all areal. Nbrrtmq Epulpmenr. Lk4 b[-Tlal Cowl Felton is Or. W T.o-F..us DwIOq Fire Nnkh Ceae1 Or a Non Drfa {rn of Onpn Form of Hnf o! Itewoo ! n,ea R„,n +Ir Smo4q MaknW 764 Bedroom .'r Ha[ from Fwl -Fin or 27Y IGtthen I <r Pawefed Ohleas irarale {m ar Bsud on 8066 mndenu Has from Mis[elWeoua I it Baled on 7016 ienoenu Mnl'nt Egmpmem Raom 7r wnerc am of onpn wr Onan Flame Ilndudinl wnarc form of hn[ a( 7rrununl Area .4 reportM Manhl ~wnma wr reported Omar Arcr Br Nas from Elannnl ~ l ar Egwpmeas Aam1 or Form of Mamrfal IWred OvedoW FumiNn 2"r Hw OgaLV lodudiq 7r Beadrq I/r Properly Opmuq Comoumhk Lt9wd er Gr ur lanneU Egwpoaae la[mar Finish 9r Maed on 7010 londear O EjM lr Arununl Memher 9r wnsn (one of gunnel ioW aumha of i0cidaoa Waw. RYh61M er Iprr[N wr rcpona ~~ Clwhret, oa a Perwa Ir 10.191 Cookfq Ml[enW 7r Ekattittl lowlsuq tr Curufw. Dnpery :% Omer 104 SWriY PIDO DaY IW I Vl] l0 19aS. VPFA fie AOYynr DLgnMOL TaM A•I-I/U i:ww +rt W Fes-rYT DueWap rM M111L Nerq A<aW Aseegr Fires-741001 Clv11W QY-a-.A9N CTIIW Ie}rM-14101 Alenla0r N Afw e/ Of1r1 Ara al Odds 1101 0.1e1 CIv111r Deafly IL'W 4 IoW W FYa Clrltlal la)arlr L;vln1 room, da, lounp Uol e0.2 I Lb 21.9 Bedroom 121.1]1 21.1 I Ld 209 Wrenn WI 110 20.d ]).i b[rvaunlAna 170.)9) 7.1 11,3 71 Ifrawl (pace l7lH 11.!) (7,2) (].9) f L'mperl6N 179)1 I L0) 11.01 10.71 ;0a1<onY. ponn 17]11 10.91 ILU 10.91 IfnhnVFlaar rumWY 11111 10.71 f0.11 10.71 ICnhnVRaol aafemNy (7111 (0.61 IS.)) (0.7) Iwa11 aerm6lY 17711 10.6) 1].01 10.1) DImn1 room 1271 2.7 LI 16 Hmlq pmpeam[ mom (b]I I9 7.7 i.b Bammom.2A 1.7 1.9 Hulray. corndor 1011 L2 0.9 1.1 Gasp-N71 LI IA ].7 :nfenor twnvay 107) I 0 0.1 0.1 CIoW N21 0.9 L2 L) Omte knprn atgk afa I.I 26.6 ) 7 (CMmIrY 17111 10.1) IIt.91 (0.7) MWUpM any 1971 O.t 0.7 0.6 Unclrafdl0. nm apgfwhk 194991 I 1 L0 0.6 To W. 100,0 100.0 100,0 'Dace nr iWvh ewlhM la+qr+coladr0roPep lY/e. aama as urM OaWr. [7{/ ~flFlww ~ ~ 1 ~~-tJ Svnem control valves should be of the Indlcaung type, such as Plug vah'es, ball vahn. but•.ertly valves. or O 5 ~ Y gate valves. k-I-J The responnbllnv for Properly mamtamng a spnn- kbr scum ~,s ;tie obllganon of the owner ar :nanager who snoultl undensand the spnnkler sv s[em Pperaban, { mmt- mum mon!n i. mamtmv.ce pmgran. shauid mcludt one i ollow mg. gal V IsUdll~ :..^.Sp<Ct dll spnnklen to ensure against ob• ........,,.r„ sp;a, Ihl In Spt<t dll silsti to dSSUft lh]t IheV drc Open. ::1 RSt dll wdltffiDW de{'lees. IJI The alarm system. :f msolled, should be tilted. ~d'E. M'hen n avpean likely the[ the ten well muh :n a respanu of !ae lire depuSmenL notld<auon ro the hrt uepanmem should be mane Pnar to the tin. lel Pumps. where emplDyed. should be opepted. ISee ~FPi J0. Smnaard for rhr /nsrallanon d/"CmmJuga/ Fire Pumpr 1 I (1 The pressure of rr uscd with dry Systems should be checked. Igl water level m Woks should be checked. Ihl Care should be uken m see that spnnklen arc not painted other at the lime of msWlauon or duns{ subse• quest redecoration. when pamun{ spnnkler ptpmg or panting m area not to spnnklen. the spnnklen may be protcctea Dy coveting with a bag wht<h should be removed Immcdlmely after punting hu been finished. o For (usher m(ormanort see NFPA I lA. Rrcomn5end- rC Pmmre rhr rb 1..rwr•n. ..r..e .._ ..•_..:,.6..... j Spa nkler Surems. Qrv WUP Morn C.4 Gau vu.a , c r. ve~• m [[n nw ~~ .a.a na.r, ^,euc ,r Con+vav F'uw•euga ea.a va•n c nw ^- ~~ ana toss br'a`--'~' Gone; on weume Gaya I o amor'as c ~ sot ~ r t Sr Ken Flash A3-a(al PnfanaM {rraapaaeet. Main cav Gur va.a Gnnol vnva 'Ryppar Fsaa IOPnOn Wrtn C11FCa Valrt RalManCF ].11 WM fccron°n NO t'. Prawn Gila c.^ntc nna..row -i-r~~va.r Drrm ana Tan Drs«mr coon«oon P•nwn Gpr {.I-S.L1 v lent three spare spnnklen a3 euh type, To Wutamnm o Gomnnc temperature rating, and onfice uze uud m the system ~ Spr,nan. 1 5rnem should be kept on me premtsa. When (used spnnklen art svrnm «placed by me owner. fire department. or others, care shoud be taken m assure mat she replacement spnnWer ha Ine same operating charutenftia. {-I•S.Le T<shng of a sysum cm be accomplished by filling the system wnh water and chaktog visually for Iakage at each !Dior or coupling, Fre department rnnrstOiom art 001 mquirM for syvems covered by this Staedard, but may De msWled at the dlscrenan of the oaa•Mr. In these Caaea hydrosuhe tau to accordance wnh NFPA 17. SrarrdaM Jot rhr lrurdlanon dJ Spnnk/rr Syrrrmr, eve required urv svnems shoWd also De tepid r•nwra c Dy psagag tM sysum ilgsn A-3•Ztal AataataW Aso^grrmtat. Gsv Wanr Mon ~c.n an Wroa WnY FiOw DII«Id Sdmnar gr COnIr01 VIIH IOOnan Rrta Wow •MnM Mnn Connal Varoa To ~amm< under ar prcnure. Any leak Cher rcwlu m a drop m svpem .,, a,,,r,m,,,F\\ 7+ s t a.eaa pmsurc greater than 2 psi IO.Ie bill in N Noun Should Da spr~nnar srv.m f~ Ne n \ corrected. Check for IeaW using toaPY weer. brushed on TT each lmm or coupling. LeaW wdl De !Down by rhr presence Domor c o(bubDla. TAis tat should De made poor [o mnctaling of v.nl ra caea~ IDurms PtPtn4 Orun ana tot Vaaa A44 Conneawn for fire protectson to airy maim tf olteo coon«uan 'Rvtsow Fxaa subject ro teal regulation concerning memo{ and buk• en«k via. fiow prcrenaon requtremenu, Preferred and accepuble •R,boar rxaa cn«kvann OFronn water apply arnpgemenu art Shown in Figum A•2.21a1. Ibl. and Icl. When a meter must De used betwetn the my L flgan a•a•Z,t1 AeeaN]W amaeawat. 1 ~ ~ws sa•aar ,. >. IJQ 16 IxiT~etarmN M SMIxRW fYSr[M I~ ONr- •xD ixPrr 111tY txtt{llb4t anD vAN4 NDMO water muo and the sprinkler synem supply. ae acceptable arnn{emmt a shown In piNn A-2.1(c). Under thex arcumsnnca. Me Bow chancttnma o(the matt must be meluded m the hvdnulie calculation o! tnC system. [Sa Tablr ar lld.[ When a tank a used for born domessm and fire prolechon purpose. a low water alarm ssYwsep when Ih< water level falls below Ito percent of she mmlmum gwnuty spenfied m Sernan J-I should be Provded. ,A-AJIU In dw<Ihn{s where lonpmnn uu o(lawn spnn• kl<n Is common. provlslon should be made for such usa`e. A.}5.6.1 Dccontive pamun~ of a mldentW spnnkler is nor m bs confused wrth she tempmmm Idennficatwn colors as re(crenced m 7•I 1.6 of VFPA 13-1989, Srdrtdard tar rhr lmmlldtton aj Sprinkle Svrremt. .a-Jd +~armsshoWd 6e of sulficiem intensity tohcleuty audlbl< in all bedrooms over 6sek{rouotl noise levels wnh all mtervemn{ anon <lottd. The tan of audiblliry level should be conduned wiN all holuehoW caulprneet mu maY be m opennon at ma6t m full operation. Examples of such egwpmem are window an conditmnen and room humidifittf. Whet oR•premisu alarms are Provided. at lent water Sow and control valve Ixetuon shoud De manllored. A-a-I.i 11 is Intended that the desiN and is m indltde tM two Wpam spnnklen prsduna~ tM atdtsst ester de- mand wtmin the compartment. It is alsu mmnded Ihas [he number DiddlN fprtnkkns a Itmttetl m a muimum of two spnnklen even d then arc more Shan two spnnklm m the rompanmrnt. ntcept ss noted m A-~-T.3. A1T.3 Fire Irsems F.a: Indicued the nted to wet wilb m the and protened 6y resldenual spnnklm at a level dour to the ctthn~ than that accomplished by staudaM spnekler dinnbunoe. Where beams, lift fixtures. sloped cedings. and mhtt obstruniow occur. additional fdidentiL spnn- klen wdl be ncceaury so achieve proper nspome and distnbuuon. in addition. For coped cnlin0. hy11tt flow rata may be eeedM. Guidaece may be obwnM from she mann(amnttt. A send of 33 fWl-sWa teas watt ncendy rnodutud io a test room of IT ft x Ta ft (3.6 m x 7.T ml Eoor and m detemtilu the e~tm of Cathedral IWpd) and/or bdmed cnlin{ connrunioo on fart rdponse rdideptial spnnkkr r. aw+lw re nwswasewrw ~~""~.~ e.w.r awrl+nxwww c..~w.: r ra.w.e nw~a a MiwN~ Dwe nnssw.~M r IIYw 141 f F7pe A•I.31x7. rpn A•b3f~k twlrr Inawe --___.__. rwwrnsw x sw.u x rat.. w a- __.____x tws~ w~ / -_ ales l~tirV~ R 011xeM MI IM M RiN1 a.w M tatlae< -lMee x rwxr ores < Ow aewa Itw aer ~ I `s' w eaw~w owwwl lar llvnhr wtsw.rwewrr w Ostww.w w- Yr Yawleu ww _~I aw. ra sasawv FAN ..... ..., a. - ma,... ~_+ .. o.• roa«.. ..r -Ti rw Fiyun \+I.:lal Spnekhr Drip Aretl for iygiwl goaiMatial Ontyeoq. ~..Mr um.~ Mwn LVwww~/aw~pam~; lnr~ Mw aw iAlw•nl ln~ / ~ ;~ ~ i //~_ Entme A+I.Z1a) SMekM Daalp ArW tr Tyalol Roaiaatdel Omleaey. ~ ... ............... .......t -.. ,..~.~... w..u. yauucur.yyv readenual spnnkler model. two ttdin{ slope ID and 14 degrm 1. and swo beam confipnuons on the single eecla- sure size. In order so ludp the elfenweneu of spnnklrr m comro111ng bees, swo box hoc tnu, m whsch she siding wo smooih and honzontal, wen condoned wuh she pendent spnnklen msnllcd and wath a nW water wpply of 26 gpm 198 Ummr a required by YFPA 12D. The nwlu of she box 11ne teas w<n compared with tan ie whicA the nilin{ was beamed anNOr sloped and two pendent spnnkler were lnnalled wain she ume water supply, Unda the limited conenions sand, she wmpitnaou indsnta tMt sloped and/or beamed cnliap repreaset • scrawl chdlenp to the fire protenson aQaMed by feet mpoax rtssdentW spnn• k lee. However, funhar rata witA bealpM cmliep Indinted shas fire control equivalent m thu obweed io else boa lint tesss may he obWeed if oee tpnnkkr is cciltertd in euh bay formed by the beams end a told waur wppty of 76 gpm '!?5 Li.^..:n; is avutaElt. P; ~ coD•.r.,i tqurvaieni to rho obumed m slit bauline tau wu obWaed for tM smooth sloped ceding sets when three sprinkkn wen rosWkd wnh a tool waur supply of 14 gOm 1300 Uminl. le a ssngk smobenng•surmd fire tat. the M1n way wppreaxd.' A1J.J.2 Anufreeac xluuons may be uxd for mainlan- 1n{ aummanc spnnkler protection m small unheated area. Efreaa of CaANnI and BeamM Cahn Connnsmm~ on 0.eudemul Spnnkkr PrNdrmance. FMRC 1 ~ MJNS MAUI. by Bdi L .0.G .Kung. v{, brown. W R.. and Ndl. E, InePared for L S F1n \dmimaaranon lFee. IVaal T~Ma Alit Maal~r Dbuw from SyNetM 0.nacw n aorre~ d fNliq OtAa~W ISD-Ir nlealw~ Dlenaee DNUa« Re. S«Itt1« nw Serl•kt« W naRa to SIM d [«II Otarncdgt q m aorla~ d CNUea Wavenieo laa man 6 in. 6 m. to less loan I R voi permitted 1 h ro less loin 2 h 7 m. h to Ina loan : R b m. : ~~' J fr n less loan 7 fl 6 m. y ,n 3hdm. to less man aR 5. n. a Rio less man lRbin. -,n ahbin. to lex manse y,,n !..^,wlns man 7ft 61n. ~1,n 7ft6m. mle«than6n Iy.n For 51 L'mn,Im.•17amm:lfl•uJOll m. Cui nq Not to E.ca« Ma. mum Oattmcnon I nwmgnd b«a4 t end I a_3.31 _~~ ~f } Maximum O~rnnca 0.nrnp Aeovr eoawn or Crnmq Dtnruaron rnr•.~,.. nw....._..__ ~, Flaw A+S.J Faollloa d 1),Ilrrner, L'aryas x Paaae•r. WMe laoxa AMn M1M d CNllta Okratrss•e. Anofrca< wlu[ions an mrommended only for systems nor esceedio{ a0 {albm (131 L). Beaux of the coo of rcfillidg the fystem or nplemshmg small lealu, st is adnxbk to ux small dry valves when maro than 10 galba 1171 LI are to be suppliM. Propylene glycN or other witabk material may be uxd u a substimx for pnmiry water, m prevent evaponnon of the pnmm{ 0m4 and nw reducs itt formaaoo wuhm the sysum. AiJ~J.J BeyoiM «rwe limiu, inctened proportion of antrfreeu daa not lower the freenog pmnt of solution. ISer 1 Figvn A-6•i.i.i.J.i Gfya'enae. disWylene Ip'y<W. etkylrnt DY~• and propykee glycol should never be used washout miem{ wuh water in proper propomm~s, because then ~ matenan tend to thkken nttt J2'F 10•CI. A~JJA To avoid Itakap, tha mauriak and workman- shlp shoub bt eattllmt. she threads clean and sh4ry. and the lomu u{ht. Ux only meWhced yalva. Ai•JJ3 Tan shwld be made bydrnvingaxmplc of the wluuon from valve B Iwo or three lima dune{ she fre<ang uason, apalally d it hu ban necaxry to drain the buddm{spnnkler rystcm for npan, changes. em. A small hydromner should be uud x that a small sample wul be 7 F' lJD-18 IVtTaIUIION M Se,IVRW fYe1[Ne IY 0•e •vD 1rq.(\MIeV O'a[LUVge vMD uouU i1pMn p -~~ J _~ .:o ~ .I .ro i ~~i ~' •yC }n~ ~ a y _ '~ -SS <o -y .t~H-~-H.. -y, ~ u [~ w >V W !V W W Iro Eem•r 9r vmam, fiaue A1J.JJ.J Finaly Prnw of MYr,r Srilaq,a(,f Etnrkae GhM ,aa DI(t-rlr Grynl = tuMr4w1 Vu Y a. Watn Prnwrt in ArM lot, Tu,! b. •rpnranlr Selen Plpe Sin -- r~ Dedun Mn(r Lou 1_~ Sin~_ ~_ 0~ O,pun X(M Lau for Elevuwp -~- Yt ~ Sy(um Control Valw• 1-n M OA),1 p ~ e. DtAUn PruuR lpa fnm City Y/un m Spnpkl(r 3 _Rpb R _'-- --_._ _valvn- R q : -~Eltww-._. ry Tn- e ~Yaul- ft+---__ -_._~_ I sufic¢nt. when water appnn as valve B or when the tex sample mdsatn tha[ iAC solution hu bemssk wealuged. empty the enprc system and rechu{e u previously de- unbed. A•,-1.J Determination of public water wpplY Prcxun should tale mto ucougt pmbabw mmssqusq p[eaure cost dinon prevxlin/ dung such pmpda u u ni~61. or dunry summer montAs wpm heavy wage may oteuf. alw. the poxibibty of imcrrvpuon by OoodL or stt rondinom m winter. f. Deduct Preswrt L.oas for Pipit'-Coetml YaiV!!O Fanpgl $pnpklCY TaW Sire Eqnw. Qean. Dncngwa Fen -- 90'Flbow ~- ~~. ,S' Elbow ~_ __ Tw _~ -_ Ctsrzk YYw TaYiaMl --1 _~ Ftn _-•_~ ToW Sin Qwa. pq E ~ ~' ,9 FJbow ~~ ~_ Tp ~~ G3,[1 VYw _._ Valvy__I ,_ - 1bW Fta _.__ R,pwiOiy P[wwge /ar ar.i.vr.. ~_.. •FUw[ how Talb u aaL w1. leA w Ie1. Fur SIUNaIh•0.1011 art pa •O.pN W. Fywa AEI-71U Ca4awgw 9awt. IaY(MaY taw Wawf Pr,wan w wPPIF OaUel 4 7kW L D,dq[t M(ad Lpw fa( ONMIOa I~h n OnNI ~•--- b. D,dusn Isu[an Lqw hpw Mpiga WiYU___ Ywwasy Inawne for lPtlrtlw UParwio. •r+n.r> has TYIw,A,sNL nr.le~,,ae In ror>t t>wa i h . o.tow s I er • otwao r. F~ Mbe~In CW W/aq ~w - LM~M Taa- Yawn hwp ptt+laaL Ypy. iwaa.~ i ~ Appaallx ! Raran~al PaNkaNom iv0ex 13D-19 V FP1 17.1989. Standard/or rhr In+m!la+mn oj5prmkln Svrrrma VFPA 17,14987. R6ommendrd Aarnre far rhr lnrpec- uon. Tdnng and llartrcrtante oj5prmkln Sv+rrmr NFPA I JR-1989. Standard (or rhr fn+Wf!a<tan of Spnn- klee S.vPrm+m Rendrnnal (XCUpnnaer up ra Pour Sroner m Haghr ~FPA ]41987. Standard jot rhr Innallmmn ai Crnmfu- qa! fve Pumpr YFPA ra•1989. Standard for the fnrra!Wtroa, )fmntr- nann, and L'rr o! Hourrhe!6 f.:¢ Surnln8 £9ulpmenr. B-I The lollor•m{ documen[a or pottmna Ihereo! are rcierenced wrthln thu standard !or mlormauonu purposes enly and Ihus are naa comid<red part of she regwttm<nts of ehu do<vmens. The edmen mO¢a[e0 for each reference u IHe current ednion as o! me due of the VFPA Issuance cf INs document. B-1.1 VFP.d Publintiona. Vanonal Fife Protettwn Asso- :anon. BaJ3erymalch Puk. Quincy. NA 01:69, Ir/ra 0 19aV Ynqul fire hMe[non MrorrloM. al rrrlrb mrrwtl, me <opvrrynr in tort loan u artrme rM a1/rM Iram tae rrprryla m IM aaun.n MraF n orate. M IkHara/ arv^arrra rrr blgr M Je aoeuraem+rt rol rpgrc»K w tort rrgn mu nrdea M rbr he rtgowrrN rn alpK d in pal h rm toner •nlrarrr Ne saPe armen a.awn• dV Varrar•I nR hae[I4r nLnrraOm IM .A, 1. nrrree. awer{aa Jb. A-!•6 larralleaara, rra Dnipl aM imtalUrwa Defimuan 1.1 n rlrrRY a.J n. TaMw t) a I. H11. SolWiam '~' brnrmr ~ ~ndJ J..~unwn a.)JI )oW,., JJb ~. M Cogmean. rrwro I A.1.1 is rhrv rl nod Fi AYMa~arer: i.a A.I •a . Conaerrbae. la mrru . b M~~ . ... ire UnN Ol rnntaremmt „ Mw4 r.. :.a -o- ... oe{.rw.... ~ e na+IV .rra ra.ullrr,.. ~.. _. IJ n•i,f P, DrrKH YM TrIQtrY.. .. '•f I :..i.a i buem ...... ............ Chap L AI Cn1eM ..... . aJ ar a .... ......... a•i.All .... ..... elhMar~. alwP i1j1~ . ~. J'1 LJ ..... . a g OaHV ltnecta, wrarM .. . ~,1 C Men~MW W arlaaatreaa .. .. .. Tsbk Y3 pMmnan . • ~ ~ ~I I 5nef aL ~ ..... L +sYw u.1la Ihrv al. n+a pSnman ,.~ .... tnaa{maas ot. 'uwa[aolaf a.35. ,...., ... ~ . . ~P r A ).f, FI n+J s Fr sere a.J 2 r lr aw r ',q JHhnIIIM I 1 a O ~ .... .. W ala`A .. Oarlna{ Wr I 1 .... ~ :.l , ... ... Cramunn PlaaaYr Sua/If „J ,~. DeAnrwa. Snln i ONnrllaa r, ainirr~ J4 f. YJ 1 7aMe 1./ f R +~rn M~ ~ I , iaa{law 1 1 im r 1~U-~~ I. nll)AnO~ or )MIVALLR !YJ)LN! rv WIG •nn nIPIAMI)Y pA'[WVG! AND MONII IIONtl M1wafla~ 1~wY M A.1 .:. .l. rew A.l:uwer ~nTOn 14 T+w1y ... b)J 4 a) 6. A-IJ I .. ryrypr p/ ayo~yd LI, 4 L3 Ail.l. A+) 6 ~V• scaan ^+ lrlul+la+d syAaun lour Cumpanrnn Denmuan slwfewn wlomnm Detlmncn Cu.mp DesM +nA :nIIallauon Lxnlon o! ~~men of Pi~ell0e an0 a1MIMmp ennetl Pounan o! RmMnuM ~Ienlllnn bMnlon I~~ l'YO of YaAIAIM. I-0 W e. vJwe.... In I.I. 1.1.1 tjµ} DMemae IJ CbW.J toenel laPFb. nmsf7.su) M a) !. A+) !. Fib A+1) b1 al ~ '~' 3~) ab aL3. A.a1.3 ~IIY'MY/ .... .... .. ....... .. ...... 41I })e. A.}le wllr wplF .... ........ .... .. ....... ... tMF.l a). A+1 CwrrY Ofl"Innee... ...... .. «I Id lab ..... ........ ....... 2.3. A-1d 1N AMf~ . ........ .. . .... ........ NI to owuun. ...... .... ...........1•s i~ so ~. I ~ ~ ... IJR-1 CapYryht O 19W YF4A. All 0.gba RoervM NFpA IJR Stnoderd fa tW IR/W4doR of SpdRlcler Syseems iR tte/16eRdR1 OccupflRda np t0 FaRr Stdrl/n u Heifiht 19/p eUno. Thin edi[iao of NFPA 13R, Srandmd for rhr lmraffanon of Spnnk/n Svtrrrru m Rrfldrnual OI•apancra up ro Four Stoner rn Hnflu, wa preperod by 4e Tr:Malal CommutK oe Anrometie SPIiak4n. rckAled by 4t CertNauq Comminee oe Wr4c Exua/uiWie/ Syeteme, and ectcd oe by tW Nstiooel Foe Prorelvoa Arociadoa lnc. u i4 PoI Matiq W W NavemEn 1417, 19/! in NaWvilk, Tioeeaaw. It w iuuM Ry dw SlendaNa Council oo lapuery 11, 1919, with en eSective dw of February /, 1914. The 19D9 editioe of thie Naadard has bees approved by tM Americap Nauoeal 54edude lanitu4. akin w tJawM/mwf ar NFM tJR NFTA I JR repreren4 a nu4aoee ie tb devtlepment of ~p~akkr IORa14ti0e daipl staedWe. Thu /Ht Mltlae emompaae a oombleM aCon of th/ /m pro4ctio~ rommueiry ro drwbp • naedeld for the DlntMion of bw-riee, ralMs[iel 4cilidn. Thu ataeder0 6 ietatlded to provMe e pro[eniae m the iohehime4 0! 4.•nr, m~ulotnmily dMnllinp. promo fir doaemfel which plnYldaa fur ieueeaad uveU d Oro4nme m 6ulldlw. «.....__ document hen Wo eneriduul r~..___:_.::..pw.v w a lpnetleled fileiYily u ~peeq ~„ vu eoapneel.red holiry. N tht dumber of mw w cilia the[ impMmee[ apeiekMr oMiereon edndelrce ro grow, II u fdt then rye4me tar cerieie reridential oavpeser as M emlieeny eed eRemiwlY iertYled is aanrducn lel(h ttlY flaedelQ Thu d0.vwet will provide rpuimmeeu oe eYf4m dpy~ which nop Rum we4r mDplia m herdwen aArctiee to prleilidaiq aed Icu4oa ofautometit fpriekNw. , ~ ~ • ~.-. gvtnrfvD/2Edlyrco puuEo To /IM02~ ~Lli`~Tf~G i ivc S ~ .Il...a. Ut-2 nnnuwrron a fnuv Wx fY!lL4J Iv valucm.u acc~...•cD ur ro ra:a Jiolllp m xLwxr CauiDaa a W~qr ExtlywiJ6lq Spar Camlxtlx~ CamlDaa ar D. J.w. cM,..w G.r4ewsx r ~noeaw lae. ~ x. s.rr sn.w.. `+woau Fin Pm/ww Mra+auoe IvovreuaD W'aaa F..UM. Ilol! laewa ! Nleaua iav 71rr J. Ywa Jr. Fwary MuaY IlwralR Cory, CaWY J. DrJ'r Jr. M~AI PN1aNaa Caawluaw altW Mrpawa, MW Hudme MIOWYa Jpa- klrt Cory. Ywr K NaR Maonwan. Ml Jaw W. YaYa. Lww W Yqy Co. OwJw w.lrMaw, kWrmw LviamW Corp, rapYNnl Coaalma a Apo.ule S~rutla'p Cvr w. LxYY. CJrraw Jabrr Lyaalny Cary. fAr L Mawr..Lewq Kaaar Omp (Marv a 14 KyrxJxl Gaaa C. Oww Daq. df Wbr f~My 11rF 1AIAVa CxDlr a ~waw AaaarY »k Cap, d •eaMn M `~ Agrw M. CrwIJ. Jr. Caa Cw Kaawy x.w ~u ~..~ ~. awJ. roae. HraY cwr. x.p MDJA lala L 0.V L'aaa Carr Cap. tit. NIA1 IAJ LN J. DAY UaMwrwD LaxwawYl W Jawr a Dawlaa, vwt ~.. d Drat wlw. IVOa IJwIW a IID W IAI Yw1 L DYw, JLa CaswY Ia. 41wr 1. Gr•. Pin Jae. Ir IIaF ANA w. DwM apaw CaN Cwp M DJpL Ilrp. uPc urw L emery, DO CwavwaY JIYlnaw 41f H. J+a~ IWf lra ~ Mawr Ir xra w. LIMB araM IIYL 4wawv • J. Lay GnaMMMnaw Jfuw Cw LLL xa. C.W ww. M Mr-[w ~Mlw pry M 0~. JvY 4OlYrL 0~-Was ~ MrMr ar. J. [ /YwOrw FW tnar Caaawi dCaaaY L!.laY~J~ Una~RMrIG J.7r /Y~ Nf M.arlaYJlaxap Mr t:Mr r Iro w IAI vla. w_ wT. .~ _.. ,rte +wav. 4x ~~ wr L h1~DA~M M hq.3Jrr Ce• ac M. NfJa Jra J. DYYI Uai1M Ma d laaJarr t y pawMa dlJa PIrwM~ L pip Pieap W d IY L7~C~Y w~1a D. wtlaw CaJw a M MwIY w~. i 11La Mal Mar RaJrd Cary, Nnw L wY1rL LJnr Ilwal iawxr Ca. MGM L J. wwrl~ VaYwllaa Lalwrlw dCarr D. M. YaK K7 err y pJ- NPM PR laaw K Lrwr. AMPW Mumxe 1PJa YHr 4. Rq N9A rJauaw i 5~ r': CDIyMITT![(![lDMN[L IBS ~ Atr[ra RPLrI L Abtl Fannry Nunar [narcY Cery. HIIpMV w W E. Wikau DN L dr po. CYrntrcal Ca. NIVfNV lol L. plle0l Trq 4 [yla.L InAwrW RILL InwrM r NenYe to K w LrnMr1 DuN D. LraaN Cewm far ftn trrW i:VmaK b'A' D WYbp LurWl p ikyK Vaa. Fm LpnnYln A>m. iAaVnre toW Tnru Grarp [. LwwyL L'a[nNrnura Lrwnwnn Ix I AlnnlN b L, 1, Dom[bl G.w L LJr[L L'nhnnun IAYOnenn d CanaN IAYmun w R. 1, Wn[YD Cunt V. l~nr! Xroa Cary. IApsnau to D. M. YuWaI RgrM D~ Nntlw, Amengn itn SpnnYMr Aux. r AlKrunwL.l Grgt J. L MsWeJ. WLL RamKY Couoc4 IAlluuulel LRKYUJUnI Nmwa M. NrnaL MuuNI t It[mae Artr V[V I nI1RnNao1 G. O'VaW) Frrr J..NI Wmk\ Lulmaa ItaCY Ca. i UImVW to E.1 Scx[Ymtd JaarpY G Vag6 S, hntrU Fin DrOL Harmm le e. C. tacrl GeW W. O'tamYN klmm~ Emm~wnn[COrp, 1/.IIrI1VV loC W !NI(1Nr1 Jame LavYL Tee Vtkty Cap. IAnemau to C. Lrnml HrrJ Sir. mu. Auoe, a/Fin CTtda IAlrmanwW Doq Htlwel JmY ilrYn. AI4t ArOmrK SonnYlrr Co, IAlreeara b L Tmmrmunl JW VaNwaL Tb lMrmea Cary. IAInmNa w T. 6. Dal1I Jab F. VYi. NA lMYb. Ix. IAhmna w w TrwMO WIIIIr A. WaYL tarlnmm • Auxna Ine. IAltmuu m R. H. lnwl Lbw L 41[ti. Hy[aa AYOa. WIY L LaIM Kopf Aaaz. bp. Canemw w Wry la LAa arq M. Iw WomIW Fin Lyrsa StMM~IM~[ a RMIr[mtltl Ogq.d[/ .ta. M vnMl CAaanlq GyLnMat L AmrWl ItL [IurL L R[talrl NIy1n AroF Lew L Cam[YL RaglW AmnYa 1prltkY Co. Ix. Jra L Dams NaL Ama d Nar LnWM! Rktll[ L Hrth qD CaYIILaY RW SFts RY[t J+Ya NY[Y 1[mrroa G HryLYa[L L~ FaawF MaY RI1a[! Cap. fear' L ItImYY. Vt[mwrra l[Irrorr Ir. Lrtma [ 71YraL NF1A Lr[f Lire[ Dart W[Y JIarYWd Fln Clatpmrr Cargo nuop Jr L Rrtlrbam Fn Rnmaf trlmL d Cauca HraF Ltr. IN. Ai d pIn LLY6 J. Am L.I- UL M Atwrrrr Wl~a L 7ti~ OrgW M pmmnen lYrma CL 4L Wlllllm TLam!- KJm[m DrRp !rY L MIIl. Rdt /ww [a Amm. Itc JLG 11L ApISrW M1kr InI1MWS lI /.Al rfY:.lf [a.'i .'t{ ~ J`gla~ m11N fLr IL ILY agr/4.plw IYm mna. atym m aM IrnMfdy aeF A[n aamna[ ~OTI: Mambaly r . Crrrpr aYr [r In W d tar e[rp.a . aNtlra[a d a. numWw x M doaperm snrllr ~ mp canals r+Rr! W nael[r rr.a 5.~ .q[ [ar.en 131- rvst~wnox or enrvuusmwmaamartu~om~r.xcm ur tp rottl ftquu ix xvclrt Ceaews Rehe~ ................................................ ......131- 7 Cluabrl Gaural in(poadoo .............................. ......134 S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ........~ ....~. . .. ..... .. .. . . ... .,. M . ,. .,.. -i 7A~ .. ....U4 3 I.7 DeLmuom ........ .......... ....................... ......131- S i-~ Cmu ............................................. ......134 6 t•S Pip~oa .......................... ............. ...~. ......ll4 6 -6 Synem Typq .............................. ........ ......131- 7 Clupr Z lVartly Place. DrIP [aaWLUea. Aaapaaa Tpu, aced 3111a~aaaa ........................... .. ... ......tJ!- 7 :4 `HOtltity Plain and ACGrylaact Tat) ...................... ......131+ 7 Y2 Dpi1a ud ImWlatioo ................................ . ....139. 9 2J watac Supp1Y ....................................... ..... .t34 9 2a Syasm Componaau .................................. ......13410 :.5 SYs<a4 Oaipp ........ .............................. ......171-1] .......... b6 locatiaa of S jriatlas ..... . ...... . ... . .... . ......131-I1 1.7 Maiataaaxa .... ................................... ......139-YI Caapr 3 9a/eaan0 Paallotlan ................................ .Ul-l3 Ahadta A ........................................... ....... .(34 t2 A1NM6t / la/aruea~ TYIlotlaaa ................................13A-! l IaMa ........... ................. ............................131-11 ~M aar~ ~ S ccvau rwnsanf !]R-5 YFPA UR Standard for the InsnlLtloo of Spripkler Systems to Rnsidantial Occupaaclea op to Four Stories in Hdeht 1989 fditlw NOTICE: an atemk!'1 (O::Jwiaj i}f 0ambfr ar lnttl dalga4 tog a parWaGh iomam aP!aaaary matm+l oa Wu paragTapn is apptddu A. loformamp on rcftmdced punlipuom m br (awl io Chapttt and ,appeadu B. P+Haca [t is emended chat this fundard Drovide a method for those mdmduals wtshm{ to imull a sPnnkla system for hfe safety sad property proteenoa. It is na the purpose of thu naodad ro rtquim 0e inatalluioa of ao automatic sprinkler sysem. This Randal auuma Chas oae or mom smoke dnecton rill be iprdled is aaordattm wish VFPA 7a. Standard /or rhr Imrallatton..Ndinrrnancr. and L'sr of Horurho(d Flrr Warnmd E9utpmenr. pnemon a!m orpaianon macered na product evalua- uvm which u ie • panoaa a oeutmtae compkaam wtm apprvprl W suedardt far 1M .vmnt produNOw a(!n[ed hems. AathrM7 Havly Ja1NWSea. The "wNonty havma Junsdwnoo"acne oraansp4oa. opts or mdtvtdstal rt- spomtble for "approvivj' egwpmeoe, an astLLluwa or i proeedurc. VOTE: Tne phrty "wNonty hewal lunsdimca" ousel io VFYa daummn id a btod nuoott sma rynsdictaa wd "approval" yerrcstt vary ss du uw rnponnnihnn. when pubne u(ery n pnmuy, ae "wtnonry caving Juns dtmoa" mry D. a ktleru, stau, knl or omtt upooal depNmat or iadividud seen a • M chat. 8re ~wm. chmt of a tus pmeouoa hurata uhol depanmenf hdlth depanmm4 brdGy omnal, eleemul iospenor. ar omen hanng wmwry aumonry. For ipsuraom purposn. w msur. sari impesnsoo deparsmeca nuty humu, or Omer iosur- aaa mmpaeY mpmramure mry W the ^wtnonn baring JurtsdiNOe." la maay nmamnanea ma proptrtY owner ar hu darpWtd +aear aawma ma rdk o! tG "au0onry harry Judedimaa"; at p`wmmees imulWroa, ae com- wodiy ammf a depnmmW oedd mry be We "wthorv iry harag)unWintw." Cheek Vsdra. A valve Chas anon Eor is one direcnao aWy. Coabol Valve. AO iadiadaE valve empbysd m cdotrol (shop a supply of rata a a spnokkr sysum. Chapar 1 Geaaral ta!twrdaa t-1' 4arM• This standard dea4 with Ue dnip and io• nallanoo of wromam spnokkr rystema for protatmn agatmt Ere hanrds m rnidr•«a •.--_~~;~ ur w ivw scone m height. 1-2' Pvpoaa. TAe purpme of thu wndard h m provide dntp and msmllaioo mgwrrmeou (or a tpriokler rynem w std in the d<teaioa and eonsM of Ems is reaidrotial occupassme and thw pronde improved ptpee[iaa agpdaR inJury, life loo, and progny damye. A spnokkr ryssem designed and ~nsullM in aanNaaoa rich this rnndaM is expected to prevent 8ashova finial involvemeall in the room of fire onpa, when spriultksed. and w improve ma caaaa (or occupaou ro eaap or M evacuated vothmg m thu Randal u iauadsd to rauis% eew rcchnolope or altamate arnapmenu Isrovidiy that tJk level of u(ery preaihad by tM RaaidaM u ass lowemd. IJ Deeaklor. APProted. Acagtebk m Ne "authariry b.nnt:= •=~- VOTES: the Vauonal Firt Froteenoa Asbeladoe daa tat approve, inspttt or Gentry say uaWktsasu, ptoadars rympmas, a maunW asK Oaa n apgaove or rv11uW tesuy kholatdesa. le dturswy t-e atupuhtlity of sutnsmwunaavm tstoaduree, agapeaet a tttatanW, tM pluace rnh VaPA a Omer appropnw sin le ma abrrem of such staedarda, use wthonry may rpurm evt• drnoe MVrdper maWkuae. preerdun or uu, The wthortry henna JunWrcudn mar alw rcM to sot bump a 4Mb~ Delp Dkchap. Wts of rater dia:narptl try u auto- manc sprinkles. apmsaed is galloea per mmuu. Dry Sysssr A syRem empbyiaE wtomatic spnnklm Chas ae atuched ro e rriNw. « -~ i..woa W aawf rtmospherte or hi(htt pRawra. Ida of pressure from the opedry of a fVriokkr or deteanioa ota 6m caoditioa cause toe mlgae of rater mm the pipio{ rYrlam aoo out the opened spnokkr. DtrNMy Usk. One or mom rootm armnaed for the ux of oae a more itsdiridtuls tivin~ tagaher u to a single houxkapiy oxen normally havio~ coakiry, living, uao- cart, and slapiy fatilitia. INeW. Equipmeas ar metenak a which ha been attached a IabaL fymhoi m other idenulyiy mark of an orgaeuation amepsahM w tM "aushonry havistt iurisdic- noe" sad tmnntoed rith produn evaluWOa. tha ma[o- wm periodic inapsetiao of psadtsnion of labtkd egmp- meat of mauriak sad by srhoaf kbeliy tM mpu(aqumr iadia4l odmplupde r1lh apptopriae Raadards m perfor- matta ca a wsv-tEad m.naer. IJasad. Equipment a eusaiW ixludsd in a list pub• listed by Y Olpaiatioa aaaptahM b tN "wthonry IuvinE jurisdiction" sad tataaehd with product evalua- tiaa tha mniatal0/ prtiadie iaspacria a( praduetioa of listed equipstssas a teauriW aed trhoas IiRieE seta other thai the equrpakss Of maarial mae4 appropnau sandards or has Pees Laud and (atmd swtabie fa we m a spalhcd manna. VOTE: TM mom for idmtthiry lisud egwpmem may my for earn orpetmaa caaemM rnh Produm <valua• 5.5 ~M lano+ IfR-6 :vsr.trwnou or srarvuaa svnew w eEY«.vnu acn,~nnan t r ro r«;a sroam ;x nncM noo. mma or whtth Do Dot rR~lu rympmet u tined ualHa rt u aln khekd. The "wmonry hurry IunrdNOV~• seovld uNra N< svaem emPbyN M i¢< Hama nraaasn• uov to idevufy a bead product ~luldpupm< Piping Spnaw. Pipma sYnema wupip esideenal occupanc:ea mmpded m serve both domnnc antl fire protecnov needs. RHIdkOd<1 OfNp«tlH. Rtlldevnal OCNpappH a In- cluded ;r the scope o! :ms uandard ;oclude the (pllow¢a, as defied :o NFPA i01<, Lae Scjrty Cadee; (U .apartment bwldittp. 131 i.odeiq tttiL rpasuee hanaa l6 oi~ ISoard gad ute 6nlisiea Irbw evantatipa type riN occupaan a¢d p,umpt evacwtlon type). (y Hou4 mote4 and dortnimrie. Task 14 V<r o/ f.1N l'W S)~IN [aewHy Fatr« firer paaral L Pa i W • 7,'I7 L Cv bar I pu ~ be9<r1] h au I Pss ~ 0.06e9 bat bar 1 bee ~ I07 h Poe ragnoW mararpp<a uW ,srwwiva M +7tTa EfaO, fu.Jar<!w .4xnr rn«ve sued is to he rryarded a the «quveme¢t. A even equtva. lent value mty he approatsstau. f 4.1 Tha ro¢venioe ptoudun !m Ne SI u¢iu has been to mWdply Ne quantity by the ro¢vmto¢ furor and Ne¢ rou¢d Ne rcsWt to the appropnau Dumber of sia¢ifica¢t dipu. Rnld<pdd SpAekkr. Ao wtomui< spri¢1dH that hu Seen speclfinllY fisted for use 1¢ rntdeotsal atxvpa¢ne. SWI. Indium a mapdatory re~Wrcmmt. lheeld. Indicate a reeommmdatlo¢ or Nat which is advtud hYt pot (equlftd. Sarlekkr-Aarcoseark. A Bra suppreeiop devia Uut operate wtomauuily whN iu huo-arnuud element is heated ro or ahova iu Ntrmai ntsa4 a.UOrwe tvatet m dischaeee over • specne< ern. Slalekle Syena A¢ i¢teQatN synem of pipin{ o0o- netted to t water fuppty, wiN listtd sprinkler that will aummauWly imsiau wrier dir<harp over a ere area Whe¢ regwrtA Ne spndtler rysnm elro inUude a roared valve and a dmtx for amuui¢a ro alum wGa the svaum operate. StwdaN, A dovvmept co¢tal¢i¢e ody ma¢desory pto• vmops wma tA< word "shat!" to mdiu4 «quitemmu. Espuouory maunal may be loduded ody ip the form of "fine pn¢i' note, m loomota, or is a¢ aPProdw wmreow Alarms. A rou¢di¢e devip activand by a wueAow detector or akrm check valve. H'uareow p<reetpr. An ekaaio ~~~nWp~ taditator « alarm check verve aettuted by rater Qow isi onp dupRipp only. war Sysur•. A systtm empbyiy wtomario Wrinkkn Nat arc atta<hcd to a ptpme ryaem eoatrtisiy nler aed connected [0 a ware suPPN' >a (her rant diwharln ~mmtdiately lrnm spr.¢klrs opened by i Ore. IJ Cdr. Mmric u¢ro of meawremeat i0 thia suadud arc le accordance wtt6 the InoMmi«d tttetrie sywm known u Ne 1¢urnauo¢al System of Uoiu (SI} TWO uaiu Iltttr and heel. ouwG of bYl reeoeatud by !1, an rnm. monly used Ip imcmatiolW erc protenioe. T'Mn uniu an lured, wud co¢venioa (anon, 1¢ Table I4. 14.1 I(a value for meeurcmem a eivcn m this sundard s followed by ao egwvalent value m oNer umu, the Ent 1•! Plplap t•!.t Hpe or mbe uwd is rpri¢Ide synems shah be ¢f Ne material m Tank t•3.1 or N accordaau wtN 1•f.3 through I-f.3. The thamial psupede, PhYacal DroPa'rhes, and 6ime¢siatu of the mauriW het¢d N Tabk I •S.l shall M at lpa egwvalept m the suadarde sled la Iha uhk and Qelpatd m wlehalaad t sa¢rk16e preuure Of ¢ol lee Nap 177 psi (13.1 bN). TYkldl NasrkY W DlrWar 5yye Sp<etaaenpa !« !lack gad Ilougppad Leo- Coved (Oairaaind) Nylde cad Saamla~ Statl Hp far M Ptoresnas UM ASTM w79f 3tleaetadoa for OMdad uN S..I.. SYM ~ ASTM A97 wrquahtStad HP ANSI eJe.IOM Stwstentma f« FJanno-Radrtaeae w<tdee S4N Hpa ASTM AI)f Copper lbb IDtera Srmlrl 3pKSWnae r« s.amk. cgpar ikha AlTM ua Spenandoa !« t7eaael Uiairsaeau ~~ Cappr ~ Ueppe. rN ~' lhha ASTM e191 Meg Hile MetY (C7aaaientloe ~~~ ~4 « 1 AWS A7.1 S9etiWdea f« Sradw M<YL 99.7 ITiaAeumoeytrteda 97TA1 ASTM a73 1•S.1 Other type of pipe w mha mry M uas4 bus ody NOif !laird (6P Wsa sevira 1•!~ whmevet the cord piq u twd i¢ Nis sundar4 It shall ba uttdentood m also mm tuM. 1•!.1 Piq loiaad wdW tlsaeeaaial ~oovad emaea shall Ge jotped by a !lend rotehiaa4oa of etnap, pakau, apd poove, Whro yoova ase at or t¢Iktd oa the pipe Ney shall a dimetteioWly rompauMe wiN rM eruaq. E.TCrpoon: Setrl ptpr wttA wolf tAkkrsere Itrs than Srhrd• Wt !0/~n rtui! m, 1103 mml and legrr/ a SchedWe c0 /m ,w s«w ~ ~~ ~- 'MIIFING MANS n[nyN INSMIy[nON aCRR1 NR iefTa. aND W sr+n ltu thon d in. 1101 mmll shall nor br/oinrd by/knnds urtd with ptpt hmmd nu 8r6ovrs. 133 Fimep ntKl is spnakler synCms shall h of the matenals heed iv 7~ble I-7.7 or m accOrdao<e wnh I-77. The chemical propemn, phYncal propertma, avd dimev smut or the mu<nak listed m Table 14.7 soap lx at Ieus egwvalevt ro me standaNf rated to the ubk. Fin1oP used la spnokler syfmms sbal be dmtaed to wttostwd toe workme pressures Involved, but vo[ lep toad 177 qt 112 1 ban) cold water pressure LW 1•!3 .NaanW W DlsseuMu StaaeaA Cal iron Cat Iron Tkrnded Finmp, Clan 127 na 21c . ....... ..... . ANSI BIbA Cuc hov Pipe Flavpa avd Flaopd Fnuvp ... ...... Mutable Iron .,. AN31 DIb.l .Nallabk Irov ThnWa Finop, Qaas I s0 sad J00 .............. .. .. ANSI dlb l StM . Fanory-maM Toseaded Fituvp Ckn I Jd sad J00 .............. .... . . ANSI DI6.9 Suttwebiee Evds rar Pips Wlrn, Flaap, am Fimep ................. . . ANSI !16 27 Spec. rm Pipy fimep of Wrpybs . Carew Stal avd Alloy SuM for Modena avd I]tvaud Tempenrures .. ................ . . ASTAt AIJa Pipe Flaeea avd Flaapd RninP Stag Nickel Ahoy sed OWr SPactal Adoys . . ANSP 116.7 Fond erw e:...... e_ and Thrcadad , . ...... ..... .. . ANSI 816.1 I Capps Iv'roueot Cotgn avd Coppu SoWn•lolas Prcuun pym ~ a , ......... Cw Coppr Albs Solder•1WSa . AN31 DI6.32 Pmsun Fimop ......... , . ANSI D16.1 a 1•S.i Jotou for me wnnsclidn of ppppey mbe shad be based. orcwsrtoA~ Soldm//Jpny /P7•i ae/dV nsey/nsyy ha µfp I Drpt roppaP nM ryrtenaa. Id.7 Oche types of Itliep mq, M me4 hm nM for thk ferviaa, ody thow 1i Sslem 9ypex 1j.1 NWPlp gyznr. A sM•pfOd tYpem (hall he toed whm all pcpma n InsWkd is asstq eol subjapyn flneai0~. t~,2 Provision 1ha11 be made to ptsneel %psy from frpzloa in uahpted sass by ate of ow of the fNb.ny accepubk mphoda; Izl Apnfreeae fyftem. (bl Dry.plpe fyfcem. ~"N`~ sJR-~ duels nklm ~~`a'W^t. dry upndhr. or dry mrendtd a (mnd pu y~n~m~ tnto unhmttd areas naa IE.LI Avttfteeu wlutiosu shall 4 inrtalled In umn davtt wuh 7.7.J or NFPA 13, Srwsdmd/or rht lmtWlmlon al Spnnk/n SYtttmr. Ckaps A 2 WptlH Plan. DMp, (astallasloo, coPtaan Twn, W Malamuacw 2 1 Workly pyes W Att9mam Tam, 2.1,1 1Ypkly p~ 2.1.1.1 Workity pknt shall be mbmsntd for approval to the wNonry haviy jluiadirnoo befdrc soy egwpmem Is imWled or remodeled Devtanoos from approved plans wll tryuite permsaMOa of she wthonry havloe funsdsason. 2.1.1.3 Worksna pkP /but ke drasrnmaa mdipsedsWe. 0o sheets of Imiform sins. wiN a p4n of each door. made so f Ilossi~nt date ~ ~Y dupliaced and mLl shor N< (a) Name of oamer and ocwpwt fb) l.outian. inclndiy fvec[ addreP, (cl Pout ofcompaa (d) CeiliaDwmnspyW, (e) fish hMaht Cray seanion. It) l.ontion of do waDa. (u I.oCPlpn o<pvdliona, (h) t)ocupenCy o/ reCh area or room. Ii1 LOCaalnw awA .:.. ~. ~_.. . ~ ~~~ .__ _..~~...wu apcea, attiea, clOSett iosWl d small enclotutes io which oo spnoklen arc eo be (k) Siu of city maie in naves, pteuure and whRher dutanm to u w~ aOd' if dad<nd, direction and iaCltsdsnD fbePjpn of t~qf ~kfdnp~ mry ~ ~ rlsW4 (l) Make. manntrduser, type, hnt cemPPamn ra[iay avd eomitW oriDaNSpnekment ImlhmpanpfmmygaWlantbnothyh•km etas: apfissklett. Pete io) Numhar of NrinllNas on essN reap, per door. (ol Kiad and botiod at alela htlb, fPl lype of qM and dttinµ (9) 7Ype of Pin for noomafaltic nipt. (r2 Nomwl pp Mat .ilk knDthe Kowa b tale. NmL Why discs! breath Asia AeeatL it wid le oattl- ~ b Mae ashy 0ea kaa. GI l.oadow eW tit a(Mtp nippla beltodt~ of Dttityt andjaau and lantioe of all veldt and mf uattiadlypewcu~aafidaa of hatl{ert fkavn. Dues, and M apnakkn, whpe +ppliabk. 57 Isa. rwasn l EA-9 ivnaw,non or srawasaa svmus m atsmarmu acci.~r.ncva car ro rcoa stsrus m xclcnr (vl NI cooed valves, check valves, drain pips, aad ten CpdOMIOm. (wl Coderpouod pipe rase, leeph. lontioo. WrtNa• ma- tenal. point of connecuoc to my mae: the type of valve, meten, and calve pits; and the depN at which Ne toD of ohe pipe a lard below pale. iU For h)draW,call+dni~ed systems, the maunU to be included oe the hydraulic data mmapbtt. f}l .\ame and address of conlractot. 2.1.2 Ap{rosal of SprtakNr Syrtaan. 2.1.2.1 The ;ostaller shall perform all required acceptance tests Urr 1d J), wmplme Ne Coevaetor's Material add Ten CemficatNS1 (err figure 1.1,1.1), and forvud Ne cettl5catelsl to the mthonty havin{jtuisdictioa, poor to askrn{ (or approval of tht imtallatmo. 3.1.3.3 When Ne authority Wvio/ )udtlicuoo desire to 5s: preuDt dune{ the cooduetitq of aaepsaow tau Ne tmW IR shall pvc advaeut aodhcauon of Na came and date ~We tnstoa sn11 he pertomsed ~~E•I.J Asq[aao Aap.~ 3:1'S~W l'Wepaaa{ Cwrenan. 3-s~.t.l l;pdttpound mesa and lead•iu eouoeaions to sysem risen sha115e dmhed betort meoeeuco is toads to spookier Dipttr{, in order to remove fineip matenaL Nat mry hart entered Ne uoderytotmd pipia{ duno{ Ne mune ^f Ne :Wraltacon. trot aU sys[cros, the dusmn{ ppennoo 1ha11 6e Cddnnntd Yn4I Water U Clea3. A1.7.13 Underpoudd trsaim and Ind•in coootatom shall be hushed at Nr hydtaulicaUy calculated water de• mend nu of N< system. cwrwaerdwatutuaaarmwtrtrteanra ~, wvad~oawrpntD netaaar _ ~~ ~i~w I~YwS~r~~~~u~~~~~~~~A~~~,~ ~~i o~~~~~~ ~~i~iri~a~~1M ~~S ~~ ,r rwrreww ~!0{Y,M aN sr .,~.r I ~~+a~+~wr.riw.~~+~raar,s ~ . ~asr wn.an.~r+•n.iw~. saw.a.~wr.vnr s ws•. a~ a~ aw a a~ as ~..s~ra~ I ~ I .wnse ~ seen . F sw_ ~~ •rs~ '~a+' .tw w i vn.r •+nw .~~ rws~w sn ear wa. a~~ rase Ma ~,Y Slime Wi Mn iyan 7.1.3.1 Cawaar'a MtWSW eN Yaw c.rdr.. N Aw.gcw M{la{. -~ i ss j 7. ?. 'wMRmG r4~s nLSIGV:WT~UAitON ~CttRr.~tr 1Lf11. HMO WIVKNAtKt 1311-9 2•IJ.IJ To avoid Propem, damap. Provision shall be made (or the dispoW of water ssmn{ tram tex ouneu. LLJ.P .sll svstems snail be tested for Igkage rt 50 pst t 3 + bam strove mwmum stem desgn Pressure. Et~eauan ;rhrn a,ker depor<mrrtr mnnrrnon is prowled. mdrofraua p.erturr veers shall br progdrd m ucaedancr +uh ~FP+ ll Srartdard for rhr !N!allarlort o/Sprrtk(n S. stemf 2d Desf{n aed [nstdhtiaa. 2.3.1 anlM and )Lnr1aM. E•3.1.1' Only new spnnklen shall be employed m the ms[allnion of spnnkler systems. i•3.1.3 Only limd or approved device and maunals v inWsated io this atandsvd fha11 bs ttsM sn spnokln systems. 3-3.LJ Sprinkler systems slWl M daiptM for a moo- mum workma pressure of 175 Psi (13.1 nMl. Eserprvan.~ Nrghn drtrgn pnuern may M mN +hrn atf srtum componrnuarc mrrd jorprrssum htghn rhan 1)S pn 113.1 eNt/. SJ thatrr Su„If~ 2•J.1 Cnarral plarlglMa. Evm au[omatic spnnkler svs- ttm snail nave at Itut ane aurprnanc water ;cpply. 8'hen cored water a used u the sole source Pf supply, ehe mtptmum gwnnty shall cgwl the water demand raft limes 30 mmutea 1•srr?-J.l d.l ors •.rs .. ,s =T s °~~ a~...~n..nou~a....wu~•w w~ . r~.r.u. rts~ wwwr ~ w > v'v ~ s rn.R~ Tw ~t ts ~ . i w (•wwMl Ya1~alrrR ~laeM~~~aerr~aR.F~~~ nn~wnra no•VJ! f1t s ~nr arrw t~taY +uws. ~aarwr I a...r~..n~.-.s ~+ t ~~~ s~~fmst .-.-.... ~~ i~ Y~IR •M a. r ' ' sm as ~"S'.^~.'7C'ilaORi'bxRis?P.s,tY,~' s+. s. r ~y y~.r I1 ~4LM~CW ti•~L ~eylrMf• IM ~ w rn r. • w .+u asses ~wwr ew .a.~.n r~wma.a•~sw~ rw i ws.r glpn LLLI ICaadwdk CrtnrrY NasrrW asd Tw Cwtldar ar Mwrpr~l N/1a1. ~~ ~M raw source art ac< he followtog water suPPIY epuble: lal A connection to a reluble water works system u'nh or without a booster pump. as regmred. ibl 4n elm aced tank. to 4 pressure :znk .rssal led :n accordance wnh NFP4 17. Standard ~.r. '~ne /~rralar:on or Spnnklo Svrremr, and \FP4 ]?. SmnJara b. uerer Tankr rbr Privarr Rrc Pralm- llJn. %dl 4 scored eater source +:th an aatomaaeally operated pump, mstall<d .n scordance with .VFPA ]0. Smnaard for ae lrtm:lauan ul CPnfrriuga! Fve Pumps 3-J.l Vlultipurpou Pipint sYnm. v.-l.J.l• 4 common suDplY mom so the budding. serving both spnnklen and domestic uses. shall be acceptable when the domestic design demand is added to the spnnkler system demand. Escepuon Damerne dertgn demand nrM. nor br added rf proanon :r mcae m prn'enr rlaw on the domrsar warn n rem upon aperaacn o/ rpnrtklerr 2.7.7.2 SDnnkler systems wuh nonhrc protection connec• nuns shall comply with Section 3-6 of VFPA 11, Standard ior;hr lnttallatton of Sprmk(n Svtrcm.r. 2J Sysne Coepostmu. 2J.1 V<M end helm. 24.1.1 When a common mpply main a used to supply both domestic and spnnkler svsiemL a angle IistM mnual valve shall be provided to shut alf Mth she domestic and spnnkler systems. and a seponse shutotl valve shall be provided for the domnuc synem oNY. (See figure z-IJ "a,.~ Ernnunn TF.. .,_b,-- .; -...., yyog rn y part o rrpo- ratr mnvol tabu » hen ;upervisrd by one of rbr follawmg mrrhodt ar Cenna! rrauon. proprumry. or remote rraaort alarm fPM(( ~br Laal alarm serv¢r that wd( coast the sounding of on sndrble vgnal ar a rommnrly aurnded point, or 'il Locking the valuer open a.1.2 Each spnnkler system snail havt^1•in. 123,4mm1 cr laryer drae and test caooeasoe with valwoe the syttem s,de of she control valve. '-1.1.7 Addmonal ~h•ia. (17-mml dnim shYl bt ioaWlM fa r each trapped ponmo of a dry syeem thal is subjen to „} fn<zmg a return. i '~2i.2 nl :cot one t ~n m. (u mm: d: s h its. (f~ mml krc ~ d<p anmeot connectson snail bt provided when the sprio- kler system hu 20 spnnklen or man. 2J.,1 Ptwsstn Gages. Pressure gages shall be provldN to mdotate preteen on the supply and systtm sides of men checc vidvn and dry•pipe valve, and to mdiau prcnurc on water supply preeurc cash. Sys sM.kkn. 2O.S,I listed :endeoual sprinklm shall be used imsd! dwelling emu. The base of such a linen{ shall coeast of tests m rnabhsh she abtLts of the spnokkn to coeval resdenual fires under sraodud¢ed fire tn[ cooditsoas. The standardszed room fim shall be baud an a tessdmtsal urav of fumssmnp and fiouhn. Ercepnon .VO 1. Rrvdmnal spnnklnx rhdl nos M turd m drv twrrmx tinlees rpnrfrraily brad for rhar purpose. Esrrpuan A'o ~ Oshn rvprt of brad spnrtkint may be rrttra(fed rn arrardance wuh thee Lsnng sn dwrlfmg umn meting the de%tmuon o! a componmrrt: 'as defaced m s7, / 1.1i Prowdrd no coon than %ow rprtrtk/m art located m rbr dwelling umr and ar /tare orte tmob dernror u prondrd m rarh s/repmg room. 2J.3.2 Ordinary tempenturc tired spnnklen r173 so I'0•F 137 to n'Cll shall be msWled where mumum ambient ceding tempenturcs do not exceed 100'F UH'q. ZId.J Intermediate tempemurc tires rcsldeetial spne• klen (I7! to 223'F (79 to 107•(71 shall be imWled where muimum ambient ceiling tempenturn arc bnwten 101 and I30'F p8 and 66'C7. 2~3.i The folb+sng prantcn shall be oburved when iesWling rcsideotW spnnklen. udeu mutmum expem<d ambient tempensuree art othetwyg determined. (a) SMnkkn under glass or pWuc skylighu exposM m direct rays of the wo shall o! of inkimedute tempmsurc claeidquoe. (bl Spnnklm to m uaventikted concealed space under ao uaimukttd roof, or in ao uovepuhttd attic, snail be of iotermtduu ttmpmturc claei8cauoa. :+~.a wnen reudeetial spnnkenn tie iwWlsd within a compartment, a deteed ie 2.3.1.2.2, all spnoklm snail be from the same manufacturer and have the same hpt• rmponse ekmto4 iocludiog tempenturc hung, Esrrprion.• DiJfertnl rrmprrarurr rarngr are prrmsrrrd when rrqurrM by I-t.3.I. 71lJ StaisdW spritskkn shall be wed io areas ouuide the dwelling unit. Euepuan No. !: Rnidenrfd tpnnkfm may 6e lased in adjoining comdon orloAbia wuh floc, tsnoorh cn/ingt ands hnghr nor tanrding !0/! p.0 m). Esnpnon No. 2 Quirk•mpnrur tpnnk/m may M sssM m acroMonrr wuh 1.3,1, E.txepion Na. 1. unW spn ~krnahava ~ spriokkn shag bt repl.y~ of oriynal epuipment.~eaG<ps:.m,.,:a:,a G°a`amerutsO i~.3J When oodmeWik ailing pieta (azvteheoeslerc wed. they shall be liaud. Escutrhton plate wed to creau a rttned or Eush•type spnoken shall M pan of a listed spnnkler aaaembly. 2J,g Plpy Supper. Piping hanging and bmm~ mah• ara.f tautly W OrRameaW FlRhhaa. ads d:all comply wuh VFPA I7, Srandad fa the /ntralla 21,!.9.1 Spnnklet fmm~ may M factory paiotN or iron o,`Sprmk/n Svtrrma ~therwne, pnnkalen snallem Mpal^1rM aed aey spn kkn tee new O I7R-10 ,axnuno~or srsnxsze srmwsw srstoesnu xannc:asuro ra xsroxiu iv nticsn 2-7.2• Wen Sappy sauces T woaalve rtn.s. oeslen:rsurunan .ccert.rce ttsn. svo ra:Nnv~xrKr IJR-II Ihu have been punted. eaceDt those wnh factory aDPiied coa[mp. shall be replued wnh new hsud spnnklen. Escrpnortr Speerd rrsrdrnnd tprmkln+ shall br mtrallyd m amordarter wrrh the /using Omuartant. 2>.5.q.2• Omamrnnl fimsnes shat! nos be aDptied io spr: rile lees D. mvone ocher than the sprinkler manuiacturrr. and anl+ spnnklen Lsted with sue lies shall be used. 2/- -1.6 it ms. Weal uaerAow ala.•ms shall qe prosided ~ ^~on all sprinkler systems and shLl be connecmd so the ^wid:ng ve aurm it siren +nen Ofos itled. SS 5)srem Design. 3.5.1 Desip Criteria-Imide Dwellia/ L'nit. }5.11 Desigv Disrhar{e. T4 ns;cm chess provide a Js<harge of not Irss than I8 gpm Ic8 L mini to any angle openung sprinkler and not secs than 13 gpm Is9 L~mml per spr.nk;er ;o the number of deign spnnklen. bu[ nor Itss rhan :he hscrg of the spnnkknsl. E.•.,r+ron Design duchargr 'or spnnk!ea rnsralled m ao .prdartre n rn Errepuert 1'o Jai ;.i 5 i ;hall be m a¢or- Jame arth spnna(rr hsrirg rnrerm. 2-5.1.2' Number of Desip S{riakWa. Ll.1.2.1 Th<number ofdni{n spnnklen shall include all spnnklen within a companment to a maximum of four spnnklen. 2-5.1,2.2 The definition of campartmenr for use in `6. I ]. I to dmermme the number of dmp spnnklen u a space that a complemly enclosed by walls and a cedin/. The companmrm <n<losurc may have openmp to an adloinm{ space rf the optmnp nave a minimum lintel OrpN of 8 in. (20J q.m 7 frcm :ht cnhng. 2•l.I.J water Demeea. The water demand for the svnem shall be determined by muluplytn{ the deny dischai{e of t<:: w,.'.-n_m.... ... .. byryn siren u-- - ~ L•l.l.a. 2-l.I.a SprinkNr Corerga` 2-l.IA.1 Rmdrnual spnnklen shall be spaced w chat Me maximum area protecud 6r a sln{k sprinkler clan nos excttd 133 sq 1t 113.3 m°). 2-l.La.2 Thr maximum durance baweee spnnklen Mall riot exceed I' II 13.7 ml and tM mutmum durance ro a wall ar par:man Mall nor carted 6 ft 11.8 m). 2•l.l.a.3 The mrnimum distance batxseetr spnnklen wtth- :n a campanment shall be 8 ft i2.a m). 2-!. L! The minimum operatin/ pteswrc of any sprinkler shall be In accordusoe wnh tht listiry mfonruuon of the sprinkler and fhdl provide the mrnimum Ilow rata spao- fled In :-5.1.1 2-l.L6 3pphcauon rate, deip arcn. arcp of covetap, and mrnimum design pmsum other tMn {!rose spccrfied m '-5.1.1.:4.1 2. ]-S Li. and 2.5.1.3 may be uud wnh spnul spnnklen IMt have been lured for such sptcsfic udennal msullanon condlnonL 2-5.1.1 Pdalda of IlnNntial Si{NakMn. 3•!.1.7.1 Pendent and upn/hr spnnklen shall be pose sinned so ilia she Jalccron are wuhro I to i m. I-s3.a m 102 mini !rom the rUbn/ 2-!.1.7.2 Ldewall spnnklen shall be posnwoed so that the de8man are wrthm 3 to 6 m. (102 to 152 mm; f rom the ceding. Esttpuan Sprna! .esidenud tpnnklrrt shall be installed m anprdanre »uh rhr 6snng Imuanons 2•l.1.7J' Spnrklen shall be poswoned sa that rhr re- sponse ume and discharge ate nor unduly at@cted by obamcnans such as cnhng slope, beams. or light dxwre. 2-l.2 Dnlp Criteria-ouuia. Dwe11L/ 6'git. The de- sip d;schar/e. number of eeugn spnnklen. weer demand of she system. sDnnkler coverage. and posnian of spnnklen for a«as to be spnnklered ouude the dwelling unit shall comply wnh spnrhnnom iq vFPA 11. Srandard for the /mrallauon oj5pnnk/n Svntmr. E.ccepnon y~o. I; When companmrnrtd mra arras of 500 sq/i M6 rn'I or Ins by 36minurr firtrotad rantrrurnon. and rhr arm rs protected by rrandard ar quick-rnpontr spnnk/err nor exceeding 130 +q fi /11 reel per sprinkler. rhr system demand maY br hmurd ra rhr number of sprmk/rn m rhr rompanmmr am. bur nor /eu rhan a raid offour spnnklen. Optnrngr jrom rhr rompanmmu nrN not rk prorrrnd provrdM such openings anpronMl with a !snit! m Itsur 8 m. (103 mm/ rn depth and rhr rand arp o/ruch oprnrnn does the hasard clarrrhranon at £xcrpnan Yo. 1: Labbrn, In orhn than hotels and mottle. fpverr. comdon. and hdlg ouuidr the dwell+ng ume. wnh /]at. smooth rvdin{r and not rxrrrding /O fr /10 ml in hnght. may bt Prorertrd wuh mrdennd stmnk/~n, wrrh a ..~.,~n~.r.r ayasrm drmas+a al/our rpmklM. ' 2•!.3 Plpa Slate/. Piping shall be surd in u<ordarue wnh hydrwlic cakuUnan procedure to comply wnh NPPA 13. Slandard(or rhr Imsdlorton ofSprink/er SYSrrms. at9/elakllra. SPlmtkn skalt h iaualkd in ~ E+crpdars Na !: Spnddm trine br omirrtd from barh• roomy wt exrrding JS sq ft /J.I ~m'/ wrrh noncomburublr. plumbing futures, -£ktrpron Na A Sprinklm moy br omr(rrd /rom small i cforhn rloxn where rhr /tall dimtrvmn clan not exceed J/t ` /0.9 ml and tM erne clan tint rareN 21 sq ft fI.1 m'1 artd rhr walk and ruling an currarN wuh nonrom(wnblr or Gmu- rd rombu+nMr mcumab ar drfmN by NfPA 110. Srandard nn 7•vpn ni 8tn/Qlr*s !bt:Krrasr.. f-ri~rpwn No. 3: Sprrnk7ers may br omrued from open artssehld~ prrrche2 ddmntn. corridors, and rrmn. f/ertppton Na I: Sprrnklrn may br omtnrd from arnc+. ptnrhmw tgsrrpmrnr rooms. trawl tpu'n. Jlaor/rrding spot. . n. rlrvarar shahs. and ether tontnlN +pan that a« nut sited or mnndM/or hwa8 purpostr or uaagt. ,-r '=rl• Nalneuaea. The ownn is rnpomsble for Me con- dmon of a sprinkler system and shall keep me scum m normal opeeun{ condemn. W I sea aew IJR-12 I\$TaLLAr10N Oi yMI`rRttR SriT[M I V R[SIDF.+r'IAL OCCL'MNC1p Ur to MVR Tip11111 IN Xf1aM C3aytes J Refereued Psbllodon }I The follow: rig documenn or poniom th<rrofare refer• enced wahin :his sundard and snail oe convderca part of the regwrrm<my of :his Jwumeny. The edmon indicated for each reference is the current rdnwn as of the dart of the }FPA issuance of Nu document. J-1.1 ?FPA Publicaliom. ~'ational Fur Protecuoa Asso- nation. Bancrvmarch Park. Qwncy. >1A 02269. SFP4 I } i 989. Standard (or the lnara(lanon of,Sprrnk!!r isremJ ~~FP4 '0-1987, Standard for the /rtrrdlanon ofCenrrifu- ga: fire Pump) FPA .]-1987. Standard/or t4enr Tankr for Prrvan fire Prorearan SFPe '1.1989, SmrtdaM for the lura((arion..Natnrs name and C'se u,/ Houtehold ~frn Warning Egmpmenr \'FPA !OP-1988. LIlr Safay Coder V FPA 220.1983, Srarldard on Tvpra ofBw/dingCorurruc- uon. }1.2 Oshes PoNitttloes. }1,2,1 ANSI PaNkatbaa. American Nuioml Suaduda Iastllutc, Inc., 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. ANSI Blb.l-1975. Cmf Iron Pr'pr flanges and flonged funngy. Clans IS. 125. JO and 800 ANSf 916.}1983, Nollrobf< Iron Thnaded Finings, C'ays 150 and 1C0 ANSI 816 4-1983. Cate !ron Thrradsd fi0rnga. C(atni 1:5 and :50 A::oi `v r u.i-i >n 1. ripe rrangn and Flangsd firnngs ANSI 816.9.1986, Fanory.Nadr Wrought Srrel Burn ', rrdmg Furrngy ANSI B16.I i-1980, Forged Srn/ Funnga. Saks-IVilding and Threaded A NSI B 16. I B-1981, Car Capps Alloy Sddn Jbim hn- :urr frrungl ANSI 816.22.1980, Wrought Copps and Coppr AI/oy So(dn lame Pnuurr frtungi q NSI 816.23.1986. Bwrwrfdirq Ends 4NSi BIb.IOM-1983, 14'ddsd and Srmnfsm llNaughr Srrel Pipr }1.2.2 ASTM Peblkatlaa American SOdety (or Testiry and Muenals. 1916 Race Stttte4 l'+hiladsiphia M 19103. aSTM ASY!ok9, c;a;,yy Spacf¢arroa ar Fipr, Sari, Black and Hor-Otpprd Zrnr•Crsarrd 1141dN yid Srons(eas SreN Prpr ASTM AUS•1986. Standard Sprrr/rrmion fw Elsrvk• Renuanre-Ilildrd Sr<rl Plpr ASTM A214.1987, Standard Sptcrfraaon fw Nping fir• nngt of µ:oughr•Corbon Snrl and Alfoy SrM/a .Naderorr and E!oared Trmprrorum ASTM 4793.1983. Spn(!n'anon for 81ack and Ha• Drpprd Zrnc-Coorrd /Galvamzrd/ Bildrd and SraminJ Srnl Prpr roe fur Prorrrngn C}e ASTM BJ2-1987, SmMOrd Sparrfranon for So(dn .Nerd, 91-1 /Tirt•MnmgnyGradt 93TA1 ASTM 888.1986, Standard Spalfiranon fw Sramieu Copper Wgrn Tube ASTM 8231.1987. SNndard Spmificanan for Grnrml Rt oy T~rtu for Wrouyhr Smmlru Copps and Copprr- ASTM E780.1986. Smndard/or .Nnnc Pnunre. }1.2J AWS Pablhatlw. Amcriga Weldioe Soc,ety, :301 V. W 7th Street. Miaay, FL 3Ji23. AWS A3.8.1981, SptriJ"rarron/w 8mzmg fit/n ,Nnd. AppaWg A u ~IRad~ U roe aOM r1 u11 r~wOfiM1 Neya dzwwM, EV ^kn^winr awPSt. orlr. A•1-1 NFPA I SR u appsopriau for use only io reaid<otial acupaoeita as u optioe to NFPA 11, Standard fw eke /nrrd(a(ron of Spnnkfer Sytrerrn, a deeord in thin dY• dartl, up m four smrim in heght. Ratddeotul portion of nay oshsr bwldio{ may M prmanM with raideatial spria- kkn io alnmmaece with }I 1.2.9 of NFPA 13, Standard/w the /nerd/anion olSynnkGrSyaumr.Olher Irortrom of sots seRrom shoWd be pronned in arxomaeoe witb NFPA 11. The Muria b this stanlMm an based oo fWl-ink Ilse ttna of ro0ma wnwma8 typical Atroishiap touts m _.:.-_. . ~,'w naome, usamm, sad brdsooma The tVu• oishiys were ariaaFd Y lypiully found b dwtlBsy umu is a Donor simllu to 18at shosre in Fyuus A•1•I(al. (hl. sad Ic). Si.Rry fWl•sttla 6m tern wen condoned in a two-story dwslBsy in l.m Anplm, Glifostia and 16 tdu wen rnedtaned in a IM 14.3•m) wide mobile home la Cberlota. Nash Carolina SpeiNMt ryrtems desiped and imtallltd acoordiaa m thu stassdasd an eanwnd m sesewr iMaliad in to mmpnrtmant A spnekYr aypem damped sad imWMd aomrdiar m tNa ataadard may ttm, hoswter, be eApacred m aoatsal ^ 8n iavalvin{ uamua9r hi{hes agrap fud bWathae sypiml far dw9ieb wiu i l0 mi ro.7 kaY aches thu those with dpieel m tassditiou wMn the iourior 8nkh ha an unuwalry hiep earn aged ntiy (Fester thu 2211• 70 6e elrxtir., syriakks syaubu ituuslled ie eroardeme with 1h1e naodard mess hoer the spriatlna r10aaY m the 6se open bNOrt the en tacaade the ahiliry M the tpristkkr dischatp m sadslpiW ar coatsol thes fn- Caoditiom Chas nib. the en m pvw beyond thu ptrin bdme spriakkr aclivetion M that iotesfete wiN the gsWiry Of tMes diasi• bution tan produce cooditioaa beytsod the tW of the spnekkr system deseribsd in thin , VnunWly blip ttlliap w ttdiy wslepsatiosa that tests m divert the risiry ha pfes from sprinkles batioae w chosen the spnnkkr duchasie pettase ham ru smadard pattern ua psoducr en cotWitiom that wneot bt eatinplshrA or coalrolkd hY the systems deambed in thin standard .~rtr..i i ~- . ,y ~-~ ,rrc~ws w UR-U ewaam L~vngroorn Meailr Hom. eM.oam n ,„,~.~ 4 so. ~.~.. a a.a cv c~,m~r ~~ w.a ~eue D o.„,.. N wSnrswa CN C11Mr L Lvrq Fa 31 Vuac i ia. - 3fA au. iI3SS~A-1.1131 Miw 2 Igflinen Q 3pinMIM LW drtum D Ormu C qrr a era PX It VYe I is . if.~ q 3M~ MI•IPI ASMIY XStr MBM. f-tM TStls M•Cwlum L . lJnlO O • 3GnnMI1r Far SI UYW I u. • 33A AL ilpn A•1-11</ l1Ny R33~. =r ~3 IJR_a nSTnlLnilOV Or SrRIVkLER 5YRF451V REEIDEtt4l CCC'I+VCI[S LRro[p,'R frORILSM MfIGNi LNa A-I-3 Asatd AMry1a d Dnrna aM IelviRf is A{wngnab 19a0.1la1 Frn-I2J.IMp ~ 4nhu Ontb-a)0 CI•iIW biarwa-!A`0 Rmarayaa h Am of Orlde am o1 Onaia 1901 Cade Ci.itW dafb IL'W fa RuLlax FIm CI•i1W bkan•a Li.inB room .ten..cungc +i )d.] IIJ :J2 Bedroom ~: LJJ ]8'/ i.a _-I lulcnen ~_s1 ad )]) _ Hallo»comdon lull al ). Imenor ¢mrwa),n)i ), I 0 )a I 1 glructural +,rea 1'0.`VI - ) I 8 1 )1 Balcony porcA ~ ]Q - ' ' I I J) I I J1 1) i0 911 nslxafied 1 i , L 'I 0 i 5j . 0:1 ' ;Cn:mbltoo(asxmelvl•ap IO I 0. 1 . 0 71 Lubb•~0!I I! 06 . 0• Dmmg rmm CJl I: OB Ip C'cul ia:; I ' 19 19 Bakanv, porcfl l-_I I! I7 p+ Utber Rnawn smalr area a I 11 B B.8 (BalAropm 12]11 ' 1061 12.q (LJl Nuluple mat A 7 16 0.7 09 Cnclau~ned. nor appl¢ame198-Val I B 0.6 p.! TuW: _ _ 100.0 1000 100.0 A•I.2 Iw.•la o! 17atwtlot. Vanow levex of fpnnkler pratenlan are avanable to Dravlde hfe safety aed property protecnon. the ftandud a dexpstd to pronde a high. but not abwlutt level c(hk safey and a iesxr level of property protecnon. Grtater protedwn ro both life and property could be ach¢ved by spnnklenn{ all ores to xcordana won ~FPA 13. Srandard (pr the fnsrrJlaaon of Sprtnkln Swrrmr v,n..• ;•r-r..:::.f of rc,toeosw spnnklen m refldenl Nl area. Thls standartl recommends. btu dos nor rrywre. spno- klenng DI all areas In the bmldmF n permin spnnklen to he omlued m cernm areas. These arcs an the omx shown b. V FP4 snnsucs to be ono when the Iaddentt of life lox from fires m rendennal xNpanno a low, SucA u ap proach provides a reasonable de{tee of Art safety to hfe. I See Toblr ~-l~1 for Drdrhs and In/cure sit .Hulr/Jaanrly Rtndenual Baldrngr.l h should be recognized That the omitsioe Of fprinklen from arum areas could reaWt in the davebpmeet of untenable condmonf m adjaaas fpaem. When evaew[ioq Mmes may be delayed, additfoyl spnnklaT protanton and other ore proxcuon features, NM u detection atfd com• partmennuon, may be necefvy. '-2-1.J.1 Tmon{ of a sysem can be accomplished Dy fillmg'IAC fyxcm with weer sad checktn{ asually (or leakage n each lams or coupling. Ftre department connecnoro arc nos required for all svxems covered by the funded. but may be inaWlM x Ire dlscreuon aRhe owner. In chest ones. Aydrosutse tau In accordance with ~FPA I J, Srandard fa Me fnsrdlartdn ofSpnnkle Srrlrms, an regmred• Dry fysmms should abo be rested by plum{ tie sysum under xr prcxure. Any leak tM[ rnulu m a drop m sYfum pnssurc purr tAan : pst 10. I a Aar) m 1a hour sAtwM be corrected. Check for leaks usio{ soapy wattt bnnhed oq each lotnt or couplin{. leaks well be shown by the presence of bubble. This rest should be mWe poor to cos<ealin{ of ptptn4 A-3.3.1.1 At Ie4t tutee span sprinkler of each rype. lemptrcmn nIIR1 a,41 ,..:ar .:_• iq me s•flem fnouW 6e kept oo the prcmaxa When food spnnklen are repucetl by the owner, An depannent. or orhen, care should rte taken to soon that Ne repluemcm fpnnkler has the same openun{ chane[enxtca. A4.7.3 Cognettion Car fin protemioa to my mans is ofteq mD)eut t0 local re{wat:oa wnarnmg metenn{ and backdow prevention re'gmntnea4. Preferred and accepu- bk water supply arran{emtou an fAowe in Fi{uttf A•2-3.2(al, (DI. and (e), When a meur max be used between the ctty water mLe aqd tbtr sprinkler system supply. aq acceptable arne{erntnt u fhpwp id Fiptn A-1-7,2(cl• Under there nrtvmfunns. fAe Eow ebaraetehstia of the miter mutt be included io dK hytlnulic pkttlatioq of the tyxem. When a unk if ttsed ra Ootb domertic and An prottctioe purpolea, a kw ester alum acuatsd whoa tAe waur le•el fxb beksw 110 peM17at of IAt mfumum atlauu• ty sperthM In 2•J.I should & amvtdN. A-3.7.7.1 Ths tables oa tht folkswie{ aye <ao be ufe0 to detennme a domaftic chip demand. Dairy table A•2.7,J.1(U, determltr tM tool numbs of water supply datum unlu dowmttram afanY point m the pipin{ servln{ both fpnnkler and drfmm[ic nesda Unity 7aDle A3•l.l.llb), dnetmina Ufa apptbgniau tthal Saw allow• arxc, and add the !ow m the tpnfdtkr demand a the to- tai pressure ngaircd {or tM spsinkMr system at that point. A-I~l.f.3 Decorcnve puatiry of a mtdenuU fpnnkler is trot to be confuxd wtN the ramptnwn tdemlM1nuon .raw.. i 4~ nmhdk A ISN-I s ,-, -Cq W,n. Mom TeW A-3•)J.Ila7 Flzara Ilea valuaa ~~C~tv Gat. Fn•Inwfar)Iltlw lfntW laalrlaeN awlllaN ~lal loll Vr+e 'e Dom+rt.e s Batnroon youp wuA alxk uOk IlodWina vr~ larxory, water clout, aoE'vem[u! wltk clgrml h _ ^ ,e~ ~~. 1 BrtArobm poop wuA OuM vLVe 1 ' BaWtub .a ,. ~ oe-.xr,c DlWwaIAK i \ rv,•x Sn~:-orl KianeO Unk ~r _ .. .Il. •e'~y • Ne!P 1 c~evun Gpe va~.f .• hubCfy lO f - Lyva[ory Y i Nam ncx 7lowx troll 1 ~~a^ m0 Tert ~"~ Woxm, WaAle7 mKn:ve =o^^x:on n• nlure Gpa Water dOU[wnA 0lfM valve Wear cloarl witA OuIA oak 6 e auramauc PabNc FatiBfla 7brmbx Ivnem Buhtu! y Fiore A•3J.SIa1 Pn4raNrAma/IMat DnOkloa foub[at0 ~ lCitcAta nbk y hvatory G~IV WUx Wm $ervln Nnk 7 sno.rreue y UnOal nta I id Ouy ralw Grv Gara C.rv care IO L•noal wi0 w u. OuaA YLw a vow. v,wa UnIW nik EuY tact j Waapuq machmt l/ IYl 3 Waabiq mKWM 116101 a fbrinklx Waur dblal Wtk OYIb ralw l0 COnrrbl Vahe ' ' Wnn dlsn enN OuaY lack 3 A„bwr cxw ~OObon NNMMH rY '•te' CnKr wwe N r [ B,clruon wtw No. 11 Damma TaW A•2•)J.IIYI TiW ~ Dalalf0e W~aaa I vrxw•a Gaaa snuo-on ~` watx cbw {~~~I----ppp`^--~~~~~•--- Vawa Wtaero' G•an one rex T'0d ~+~ Twal Daara 47 Galkaen M.Nlsaq Ga1UW Iha~ TaYY Ivr~~h Fupr.d.wlu tM Connx[~an .rnwn Gaq l . A3•.U.IIW Flask Valwa -` I awu[omNn I TO Oo~nnrm I s ~ I I sonnhlx I 1 f fnrwn z y fnmm 7 10 ~7 {pm Firya A•z-).S/Y) AtYaFdkY ArlwIMf.Nk valve 10 If _3 Saaanhbs. ISrr 1-J I / Ercrplan.l 3U 30 )1 fi 21 u7 fo >o so c~lvw.[xAfaq oo ;i 0 l ~ c uo f7 so Dtv We 300 6f q0 vNw 210 7f IW 710 100 133 Warx sla. Wlm s00 121 170 770 Ili 7 wraels ]onnrgr Me[n i ) 1006 z00 OD e•etlurr Gape Contra VNw MIq contra 1300 z71 j73 IOp[gn:nllMan( VNw 2D6O )$J 1'l 1'e AUromx~e 7.1.1 (?KOllrn u Cbmwtrt >,a0p 11111 iw $Fvuyr iv(rxn n^. }I + 1 Irx1T ~~ 1 DernaaM <oWn u rcfereocN io } 11.6 of NFFA 17, Smndord (01 the F•Maure Oqe Au[roll InJ3Wlotmn 0/Spnnkltr SFJJaII1J. Olun arq 7Mt Vawe eonrneuon 'l/uWx Fart' A•S•S.t.] It i1 intmdad tMl tM daipl am is la mdude Cneer vNYe up to four adlattnl Jpnoklm pIVdYCIn~ the yralesl v.altr ' demand wilh[o IM rnmpu3menl. nuebP .xIC ChKh VavF DOnOnx Flpra A•7J.21e1 kMYJakla AnMpwlll .ilk Vt1Aa A•24.1.7.J Firc IplinS hY indiGlad tM and to wm wJlls SaNaalaM.ISn LJJ I fACrprurt.l m the area prolMed Dy Raldenllal fpnnkltn at a le.el (~5 allhuta~ IJR-16 IYSMLATtOM OI SMIVFy ja ymrb ~N atlle(MnnL OCR'hNCltl L'. 101d/n }Iglb IN Np(ry{ T e arm I r ... ~~ / / / YY Aw nP•wY / / nra i-~ •711' a:e -~~~~ ice/ ~~ NalawwwawYw r•atlll n FiPen A-i-l.I.IIU SFaleYlar Da1P Aran. fa >Yllal RaiMarW pMpq~•f. I n Rrw qua J a!Yw. a. nu w o.eer I / / ~ / /~_ Il~lawlewwwrlao aasa.r - Fleaa A•1•}.I.)(il Saeleklw pulp Aran ft >}F~ RaaWwYl ~. Gn~rN pu,~ Not ro E.cwe Mbimum oetwcvlen o«mnew I.x ]i.1 1 Lne Z-En > 11 lwM ~~ Muimum p,aumRa •~elleelb Anp. 9onem cr c.~l~n! onanueoon I '~nuvcq From New Aaq of C«I~rKI Dbe«ucnan FbaaW~•1•lfelofw AhY1M 1(DERaetw, L'Rhh or NeeaK illwua rV CNdaP Dlan'aaoae. A•1.7 The rnpowibility (or propeoy maiotaieioR a spno• kla rypem it tM oDliptioe a(the owner or matupr, who should uedenten0 the apripkltr rysum operation. A mim• mum mootWy maintennocn Inopam should include the folbwio~ (al ViuW impettioo of W Wriinkksa to enatm aping abppKtrnp o(Wrap. (bl Impeetion o/ W vulva 41 awm that they ara opna, (q Teaitq of a4 wltterROw dniea (dl ration M sh. alum rynum. it imnikd. NO'(E: sYRa it appaaa lihaly itW td tq Mll rends io a +apgr of IIK M ~L RanRralrnn b tM Rn oaPetsaa tROeW 4 sneRa Poo' b tka oa lel Opratioe of pampa, avRtn emobsad. eknrin .. .' ~n iu, erwderd fa rAa hvsdlonon of Gnsrifu)Ja%fifin PusnPU. (f) CTackinR o(the preayte of rlir uteri wild dry fyttems. (f) CheekioR of water kvN io ulelu cl^••• '^ ,•• ••:!ir.; :: as ".. wwmprraeen y' atrmdad spnnkler dutnbu4ee. Whera benma, IiRht Rxttua, mliop, and other obstrumioet occur, additiotul rates I:al spnnklen may be oaeauy [o achieve props tenD'oolt and dumbunon. aed a pester water supply mry he canes nary. Table A•1-S.L7J and Fipra A•1-S.I,7.J provide Ruid- aoce for locanoe of fpnoklen tsar otdliolj obeptrettoea. Ta-M A•1•l.1.7J HId~pYtas Rem RPaWla OallaaM b Rgaar a/ CMYeR p4atnla R~ RISMI~~a Dbtaan Ras SMaklw GWR ~ ro slea w cru.a olaeweaa Lna tMv a :o. n ~ ~~ - In. m lau uue I n i n le lea In,e : n 0 is n to leY rhan 1 R 6 m' f is 1 iR )na~e.mlmtw)n )ice 7 R to lea Ilan) R 6 re. 11e 1 R 6 la, to Ier tNn I R . 6 in e n to lea Ihne t n 6 is I R6 m. to lea daefn . 7 1i S R to lea tMe S fl a le. yLL I I u S R a m. la lea tMn a n . 11 le. Fw SI L'Mw I M.. 31 a we I A ~ e.Ipe a Ti11a A•Y1 hsapayta Tati4 W MYaReuaa llet4arw CaetFaar AetlaRp Ftagnaep Rafaea Caaaal YYw IaPaarae ~ ~ MrRlananae AnarWly NFM t)A. Mau Arnie Yaw Flow Tal AJaleRy 1.7.1.1 NFFA 1)A, I 14.1 T~w Flow Tep WalnRew A4ra F.~e Taq T Ntaeq NFFA I )A. 1.la. SprieYlaaa rat fR Yn NFM I)A, lPrintYa, y)') RauQR Tall 30'16 NFM 1)A. NM Flow lYM 'AanaOY s•3./ NFM 1)A, As4nwa 1'41.! loluuoa Tm Augelly NFTA ISA, ~7) laaaw.al ~ W W v "^"01k' IJR-17 (h) Cut ahouW be ukaa m xe that eprinkkre arc not paieted ether u cht lime of ivW Winn or duno{ whu- 4urrct ndKOration, tt'htn paiatie{ rpritkkr prpiW or parnnn{ io arw Dear [o tpnnakne, the tlrnoklen may be protec[ed hF cov<not":rh a ba{, vbich should be removed immedu[ely after puann{ it eouhed. For further infor.oerioo fes NFPA UA. RKOmmended Praouor !or the /nrprcnan. :nnn/ and .Nanrenor[re a/ SPrrnklrr Svneme. ArytN{a 8 Re4rtara{ PYIIadoN chit dornmeet. 7'M edition iodiwted for etch referenee u Ne current edition u of tha dam of itle NFPA rsauance of Nia document. LI•t NiPA lhtykadau, Nuioul Fin pmtmtioo Ast4 cation, lMtmr9muc6 Park Quixy, MA 03269. NFPA 17.19!9. SrandoM (w the (nnN(afon o/Spnnkln Syrremr NFPA 1 JA• 1987, Recommended Pracnee for rhr lnrpai+ nan. T'nun~ and.Nanrrnonet of Spnnkkr Sytrama NFP.A ZQ 14{7, Srarrdordlw me (Atroydnon of Crnrn/u gal Fin Ptrmpr. &t The fallorvie{ documepn or portioaa thereof an referenced vithio thin standard Por iofotmatioeal Wr9wn on1Y and thm are not maudered part of the « quiremmn of ~~ rwaw UN-19 IYSAIIwiION Ol SIRI\kLEII fYTlF.4f I V 11[]IO[.MnI CCCCM VCI61.t r0 [qlR SifM141 V NIIGM IfMa C 19[Y VsMrl [In hwnwn cNZUUpI, LI n[Im nYrnJ, Tnr ropnnm in Inif ~nnn if NpLpf LM EINYK: M1nq IM fOp^:[Y ~n :M 0n[YgCm.nNn n iMfq 1Tr IKrpYI[ ppnNpy YI (poll M1lr JY CYryrfll Nf 1 ~Cpllcaplf ro InN r Thn illYa ryy ml Y rtpMU[N In r/IgY n ~n .urt T a) Ixw ~nlYY1 N ry Nnwe Y~ ~ Pf~Y:w nt ~ NOeW Mn Itwr .w nuuianwr nc A • Pnlvmlvv of I d Slnvl M :~f J fC[lpYerf IM fupport. .. J. ~.:.: i : PYpte[ ffAf• eNtl tiPf~ !.a 1 ~~11. A-2•JI flulnln[nneenlounJ COnnecnam. !~I1 ' bbb A1d 111, veJ el Afa4m :.ab 0f6olew. la NueQJr hafete wY 1.a1 DennlJlon IJ PfeYmbL lefeb N... .. A•L3. Fip A-I•I la wn n. iaMf al4 AmlfretY wlYbvf Idl.l PaYp~Nwee[ffM1. _, l.!. A•I3 ApprwY Ol silYeM !~I :. FIp. !~I!I ~. G CYapmeeY, fnnY IIYIMaW ef[ePee[lef '-1 0![nmw ~ Iq CwseYeeY. [n efY...r.f 4b1 J _. MLJ! 3• D- YepeNlta•YIN.,.. ... .. LL MI.1 ofeY WlwWWb !.!. A.1.3 lefWYY .. ..Sd.f Drrlm anJ mnmW. !~$.I. b23,1 1YYemc S:41fm !.f. bJ.f Uf[elOOe.. ... .,.... ....13 CnlmllnlY OYmlln[wn '~11 Carfn~l.. ... .. .. ... .... .. 2-].I.n Cntfnl. WI/YI JWIIIII[ Yllll. S.f $ I.pOllpe pF... .. ~ ~ ~ . ...... 2j Fart mlm[ A•1.1]I `JYnMV N.... ...... . ... J-f li. 1•!d l! 1.efm complMMO !J PLVCy atl otluufeW 4rp,.. ., !~nf9 A.EJfi2 knot Ypp1Y !.). A.3.J lveeve N ... .. ... .... .. .. ..f 1 1. A.L7 I ) 'IK ~ °^" . .. . ...... .. e[ ol.alw ~ .. !..].I. z~ 1.. 3.11 N o. Yve. WIw. ::: D . .... ....... ... IJ Dfflmnon. IJ q M1frp. Qfeyf _ • - • ~ Y pppcy .. N. I. 7 A . ~.I S only Dfb !dl mY.. ., I•l orf MIfYn Id IIbA A•3•I 1 2 Muuvuo :4. 4LI Dennlllon IJ fueyll[ Dwllle[Yll Cf[WYN.., IJ Denmuon IJ -i• f- T!Y . .. Iw Alnp[[w IYY Ilnlep ..,,. L].I. L1J ]pnnW vM Jlmmeem . ~ ...... bbY I.1.1 •U- .1. VeIYNeJfre~~l.. ... .. .. Id InwalWlw ...... N[0[Y[e [M ln[WWlell •Y• .~. Nfge.., ~ ~ iJ I ~ O[blua[ .. ........ . .. .. ... I.1 loleY LfE Ce[Y01 DAp4o[., .... .,, ..1.) N• ~. Nwfe[eNef Ife UeelNmfwtnlYM Ofef~sf// .. .. 3-011 M ... p .., .. ~P ][el[e[~ ... !43, A•3.f3 ., wl[n...l[r~. w AYllllf wf .pfnr. Idl NrIM n[IJ aN J4mmuenf AbY I J 1 wlHq p[~, : I I t_.~ i ~ /1 ~, P E><~~b~t Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Installation Standards for Quick Response Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems Per Rancho Cucamonga City Ordinance ??, all residential fire sprinkler installations shall comply with NFPA 13D or NFPA 13R Standards (1989 Editions) with the .roflowing revisions: NFPA 13D (One• and Two-Family Dwellings and Mobile Homes) 1. Revise 1.5.1.2, "Exception:" to read: Exception: Listing may be waived jor tanks, primps and jor hanger as permitted 6y 3-4.1 only. Thrsr items however, mast br approved by the Fire District. 2. Revise 1-5.1.4 to read: All systems shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standards. All systems shall be Flow tested in accordance with RCFPD Standards. (Tne mrenr o/ tnu cnanrs is to attars proper inttallattan procrduru weer employed and ra give added atturancs aaalnrt futwe failure.) 3. Group R Division 3 Revise Chapter 3 to add a section 3.7 to read: Ail buildings exceeding 5000 square feet shall have installed with an approved fire department connection (FDC) in accordance with RCFPD Standards. 4, Revise 3.1.1 to delete "Exception (c)" ;The lntsat of rAlt cAaxge 4 ro arrarr !!xt der butklL:r occayoa: caaarr po,- ribty tillable Uu ryttrm wlrA out Eltabllna domsttk worse.) S, Revise 3.6 to delete the Exception, and add: The water flow alarm shall be located on an exterior wall of the master bedroom, such other location, as approved by tha Fire Chief. i (~9 (The inteu of defeeind the ezeepNon is to assure tlwt an audible evacuation device is sounded upon sprinkler ocrivation. Tht intent of the M. bedroom j(ow alarm (acaNon is to bockup the smoke detecmr as an alam for the bed- room most (ikcly to bt occupied. It is not the inru,t of this tecliow to require a(ormr jar every master bedroom /n a tingle buf(dlnq, It is the intent of tA4 section to allow JJexibi(Iry in the foeatton requirement so that the alarm Is „laced in the best location ro alert occupants inside and neighbors, passoby, etc. outside, of a water flow in cast the occupants ae nor at home ) 6. Revise 4.6, "Exception 1,2,3,4,5", to read: Exception: Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces, and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. (All order exceptions sse deletW.) RANCHO CUCAMONGA F[RE PROTECTION D[STRICP STAFF REPORT _ t DATE: June S, 1990 i 7Q Chairman and Member of the Public 5afcty Commission ~~I FRGM: L. Dennis Michael, Firc Chief BY: Lloyd B. Almond. Division ChicG'Firc Marshal SUBIECC: Findings of Fact for Residential Automatic Firc Sprinkler Ordinance: Consideration of recommends[ion to the City Council for ap;. royal of a Resolution detailing the Findings of Fact relating to the Ordinence Requiring The Installation Of Automatic Fire Sprinklers in Single sad Multi•Family Dwellings. n. BAQCLiBQS1~ The State of California, through its Halth and Safety Code, mendates that Findings of Fact be adopted whenever a city or county makes changes or modifications in the rcquircmenu contained in the provisions puDlishcd in the State Building Standards Code (i.e. Uniform Building Code) that ue considered to be rcuooabiv necesury t..~.._.- cr :c ; .;;w.uc, geotogmu or topographical conditions. Although the law sta[ta that only one of the three aforementioned conditions needs to exist when filing the Findings of Fut, we have prtsented evidence oa all three oP the arcu in en effort to aubatantiate more clearly and definitively the problems that exist within the City and which emergency pentnnel have been and can be confronted with. Also, we have added anew dimension to the findings is thu we have included graphic iiluatratioos of what we have detailed is writing io as effort to add clarity and proof m our Bodlap of fact. Attached an copies of the correspondence cant to the Building Industry Aasociatioo (BIA) sad to the Chamber of Commerce advising them of the propoud Ordiamce aa4 thin public hcaring. Res a tfully submitte~~ ~ i f y/R~/yli,///~ L. DennU Michael Fire Chief LDM/js ~~ ~..; ~~`-n~- - - - - _ .,.- ti-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION ~I5TRICT `~ ~~-' ~ m~ owr. w. ew, a.~ma c~c.mane.. c.~~mmu vcai.xw. :u~ sen:e>s Anril 23, 1990 Mr. Bi11 Ruh Building Industry Association Baldy View Region 9227 Haven Avenue, Suite 280 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Ruh: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council, acting in their capacity as the Board of Directors fur the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, has directed staff to prepare a proposed ordinance requiring fire sprinklers in residential occupanices. The Fire Board/Council considered your letter of request to assist in drafting the ordinance on April 18, 1990. Staff was directed to draft the ordinance, forward a copy of the draft to the B.I.A., and advise you of the opportunity for public input during a public hearf nv n.n..... On June 5, 1490, the Rancho Cucamonga Public Safety Commission will F.o ld a public hearing regarding the proposed ordinance. The City welcomes your input as pant oP the hearing process. The Commission is expcted to forward its recommendation to the city Council regarding adoption of the ordinance after considering public input and the requirements contained in the proposed ordinance. The City has always welcomed input from developers, business and the general public regarding matter o: actual concern and benefit. The approach utilised in this procaa^ is consistent with the City's abdaavor to provide an open locum whore all parties can once again take part in improving the quality of Lifer iR Rancho Cucamonga. i 7~- Mr. Bi11 Ruh April 27, i3?0 Page two Should you have any 9ustions, or would like to discuss this matter in Further detail, plerse contact my office. S'ncerely, ~~,,,~,, L. Dennis Mi~ el Fire Chief LDM/rb cc: City Council Public Safety Commission Jack Lam, AIC P, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development i/f.loyd Almond, Fire Marshal i ~3 j r:L... ~1~ _. __ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DIS7AICT ~-~ ro.i oa.. ea. eso. x...na c~s.mone.. c.eiom. c~,oirosa :-t.~ oe~.xvs May 21, 1990 Danielle Watson, Executive Director Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 8280 Utica Avenue, Suite 130 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Danielle: This letter is intended to advise the Chamber of Commerce that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in conivnction with the Rsncho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, will soon be considering an ordinance requiring automatic fire sprinklers in residential occupancies. The proposed ordinance will apply to the new construction of single and multi-family residential occupancies, and will not affect current requirements for commercial/+~a.~:tzi.:l bui 1 A T n.~. _ on June 5, 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga Public Safety commission will hold a public hearing regarding the proposed ordinance. The City welcomes your input a• part of the hearing procus. The Commission is expeoted to forward its recommendation to the City Council (tentatively scheduled for June 20, 1990) regarding adoption o! the ordinance after considering public input and the requirements contained in the proposed ordinance. TF~ Citi ;,.. always welcomed input From developers, businus and the general public regarding matters oL mutual concern and benefit. The approach utilized in thin procee• is consistent 'with the City's endeavor to provide an open forum where ell parties can once again take past in improving the quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga. ~! Danielle Watson May 21, 1990 Page 'lwo Should you Nava any questions, oz would like to discuss ` this matter in further detail, please contact my office. ._ Sincerely, ^ De Michael/5~A`,~~ V Fire Chief :% LDM/rb '~' cc: City Council Public Safety Commission Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Develo,P~ant Lloyd Almond, Fire Marshel ~/ i ~s RESOLUTION N'G, rDflAfT A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONCA MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS AND D ETERyf1NATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY'S 0 L'lLDI]'G CODE, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO, ARE REASONA6LY NECESSARY BECwUSE OF LOC.iL CLUtATIC. GEOLOGICAL OR TOP OCRAPHICAL CONDITIONS. .."~S. ,.1 Caiiiomta Healdt and SoCe;y Code Section 1793; rcquvcs all clues to .'_apt, as the C::y Building Standards Code, the Slate 6uiidirg Standards Codc ~oo.cd ^~u rsse,^,t :o ;he provisions o: Chapter a of Pan Z= of Divlsicn 1? of the .,.:: fo rnu Health and Safety Code. (i; Pursuar,[ to California Government Codc Suton SG032.2, the Ci;v cf o Cucamonga has adopted by rclrenec, the `Unife:m Duiiding Code. 3~o Edition." Fii) Scclion 17959.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provides, r ,_cr;incn[ part, as (ollcws: ' a city or county may make such changes or modifications in the requirements contained in the provisions published in the State Building Standards Code and the other regulations adopted p::;sumt to Sec[ioa 17922 as it determines, pursuant to the provisions eF Scc:inn 17958.7, are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions." (iv) Fr,or to makira rh. m,.n; a,.,..c_: F-T~;t:.d viwcr 5ecnon vY58.5 or me CaliPornia Health an! SaPoty Code, this Council is required to make an ecaress finding that such modifications or changes are needed in aaordanec •a~ith Ca!iforma Health and Safety Cedc Section 17958.7. rv) This Council desires to amend the provisions of Section 3802 of the 'L7,if~:m Building Code, t983 Edhien". full All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have c ccurrc d, D. RESOL37RON• NOW, THEREFORE, be it found, determined and resolved as follows: 1. Ie a!! n_spas as sa: Curb in the Rccaa!s. P:,^^. A, of ibis Resolution. 2. This Council does hereby expressly find and determine that the amendments set forth in Ordinance No. amending Section 3802 of the "Uniform Building Code. 1988 Edition" Ara reasonably necessary because oC local climatic, geological and topographical conditions. This express finding is support ed and bated upon the following more specific C:^dings and demrm inadons: Su;n; utior, ~.n, Y :.~' ~ A unique geological condition exists within the City of Rancho Cucamonga in that five earthquake faults are ;resent, which create the pommial (or severe damage and fi:e hazards. There is po«ntial also for damage to roadways and impairment of access (or fire equipment to «spe r.d to emergencies in :he event of a scvuc earthquake. S:acc laauary 1, tvv0, :hc Rancho Gcamongg area has been jolted by at Icas~ 2S earthquakes and after shocks. ranging from 3.1 to 5.5 on dm Rich:cr Scalo. (Sec Fzhibit .4 :ad A-q ? ~,d ve rse ceobginl conditions exist throughout a scbstantial part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that give rise to excessive !boding. Flood control facilities arc not adequate to handle the wamr flow that occurs during major rains. Some of the streets in the City are actually designed and used for flood control Purposes, thus making fire and ert~ergency access difficult during Flood conditions. According to the City's Engineering Department. using Baseline Road as the median east-west street. during a normal rain season, the (ollowirg streets are designed to carry the runoff as indicated: (a) Carnelian Street: LI00 Cubic feet par second, or 8,299 gallons per second (b) Hellman Avenue: 1.700 cubic fear per second or 12.717 gallons per second (c) Hermosa Avenue: 2.700 cubic feet per second or 20,!98 gallons oer second As a consequence, many of the streets within the City are impaired during such Flood conditions and such flooding causes physical damage to the streets and the accumulation of debris, all of which hinder the access of fire equipment to respond to fire emergencies. (See Exhibit B) 3. Access of fire equipment responding to cells is often hamperad by the adverse climatic and geoingica! snndislo.^s hin the City, because all of the City's fire stations are yin the northerly portion of the City. The northern area o[ the District is often the moat damaged and impaired by the adverse climatic and geological conditions, thereby limiting accent of emergency vehicles responding to rails within their own "first-in" district. (See Exhibit C) 77 i=eve i B. 2OPmRAS+HirAL. The topography of th< City of Rancho Cucamonga is generally that of a gen Uy sloping inclined plane which projec[s from the Nose of the San Bernardino Moumains. at an c!cvation in excess of 2600 fee[ shove sea level. in a southerly dirccion where the clevauon is approximately 1600 feet lowor. \atural slopes of nght percem or gceaeer generally occur in tha northern third of the City. In many cases. slopes in the foothills exceed :0 percent. There are twe !ccaticns where steeper topography occurs in the southern portion of the City. These two localier.s are the Redhill arcs and the area directly oast of Redhill Purk. The elevation changes caused by the moumains and hills crcaros the geological (oundation on which the City is built and will continua to build With much of the Oatlantls either al¢adY buiic upon or dedicated for approved projects, it can be anticipated ihu future growth will occur on weeper slopes and greater contrasts in terrain. All of these topographical conditions have created slower response times of emergency vehicles into the high growth areas, due to the oztraordinary uphill slope of the land. C CLLR: Extreme high winds, commonly referred to as Santa Ana winds, are generated from the desert and reach the basin through Devore Pass and (first contact highly-developed areas within City boundaries at velocities, sometimes in excess of g0 mph. Extensive damage often occurs during such winds, including downed electric wires. e~w.... pc;_,;, r°~k^ :.-... G;v..B~g sans and dust. 2. In recent years, beginning in late 1987, the City has incurred Santa Ana winds ranging in velocity from 80 to 83 miles per hour. On December 12. 1987, approximately 30 Edison power poles along Base Line Road were snapped in half and blown down by the high winds. Those downed poles totally prevented the use of Base Line Road for emergency vehicles. Alternate emargency routes had to be utilised for the next three days, The use of those alternate routes caused delays in what would have been normal and routine emergency responses. 3. On 7anuary 22, 1988, winds again caused severs response problems, High voltage electrical wires were Mown dawn at numernUa !oaativ,-,; throughout the Ciry. Emergency apparatus were tied up at those location pending the arrival of Edison electrical crews, which in soma cases exceeded one hour. ~~J P.CSOI u;;on .`:n. Fade 1 Y. On February ib, 1988, winds again hit the City extremely hard. this particular time the high winds generated such a severe blo•~•ing sand and dust problem that the emergency units responding tp a structure ^re east of Haven Avenue were stopped in their tracks, due to no visibility. That incident not only stopped the emergency response, tut also resulted in significant fire vehicle damage. Th<se adverse conditions resv!: i,-,. (a) Fircs (See Exhibit D) (b) rmpairment of fire equipment access (See Exhibit E) (c) Delays in responses of fire equipment, and (d) Fire personnel and equipmen[ committed to non fire emergencies 5. Weather conditions, coupled with flammable vegetation in the City «sults in numerous wildland fires, which draw existing Cire fighting forces Cram their structure protection duties for extended periods of time. this results in extended response times to structure fires when such personnel and equipment are committed to non•structurai protection. (See Exhibit F) The City Clerk shall. and hereby is dirceted to, forthwith upon :he adoption of this Resolution, file a certified copy of this Resolution, together with certified copies of Ordinance No. ~, with the California Deparment of Housing and Community Development a< required 6v Secrinn t~o~s,7 :e ..~ Q::ivwia iieaoo and Safety Code. ». The City Clerk shall certify to the adop[ion of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED THig T day of 1990. Mayor ~csolution \'o. Fas• f. DEBRA 1. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do '~:ereby ccrti Cy chat the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular a.euiog of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day oC 1990, and was finally passed at a regular ,.,._. of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the Cay of 1990, by the following votc: AYE,i: Counci! Members: ':OFS: Council Mcmbars: :;3ScS ~: Counci, Membus: A°STAI :~7: Counci' Members A7'IFSi': City Clcrk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~ ~~ do 0 a a z a z O LL ~. (_~ Q g U << U j U ~ 4 a 1; u' ~0 w F'Q j O~ Or ti `a ~~~. b tib s ~ S ~ ~'~._ ~ ~~. zp ~ 7 J 7t LL v s N J ~1ai` ~~ O •~- O tl °~ ~~ _. '~. ~ •~ ' Pv 0 4 WQ ~~ EX~1B1T A' ~ ., ~ .~. EA MOVES LATERALLY gPPROXIMATELY THIS ESCARPMENT RUNS LATERALLY 8_ E'Ow E °@OG" IN NORTH ETIWANDA AND THROU ORES'tRVLFIREASTATION ONCE WAS THE SITE OF THE U.S•, F gARTHOUAKE ESCARPMEry ~ "` ""'~ ~ FAULT LINE !T !S ESTIMATED THAT THIS "MOVING"„ PM PER Y EXHIB -n~~~v-n_:.. ~T,~yB FLOODING ON HERMOSA AVENUE AT CHURCH STREET 1990 w FLOODING ON 4TH STREET AT I.15 1990 ©riginal .Poor Quai.. a _ ~ O ~ _ I \ = N ~, ~ o W ~ ~ ~ Z a M ~ I Q ~ W . I ~ W ~ sY x5Y3 • cf1~ = ~ ~ = K v+l I '1~Y YCNY/Jl_° 0 a ;nr al m _I ~ 3nv xs.urla.n y~~ :,a'~'~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ I~~~~~ ~ s- ~~~ EXHIBIT D ~'~$S BRUSHLAND IN NORTH ETIWANDA AREA TEXAS FIRE AS IT CROSSED SUMMIT AVENUE AT EAST AVENUE SCHOOL EXHlBIi' E W _Z J W a m z Q Z 3 0 0 2 3 0 J CG N W J a W (7 Q F J 2 _~ S D _A L n THICK VEGETATION GROWTH IN AREA NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE t i s TEXAS FIRE BEFORE IT CAME OUT OF CANYON BOWL. AND RAN THROUGH ETIWANDA 9 / EXHIBIT F ,, loll I Vr ILH1VGriV UUUAMVIV IiA A~CUCAMp,~9 MEMORANDUM ~, , .. t~ ~~. _~ i, 19'ii OAT^a; August 27, 1990 TO: Dennis L. Stout, Nayoz I FAOM: Deh ra J. AdamOr CMC, City Clerk SNBJ$CT: ATTRB3A1(C6 AT MOM R At your request, I have listed below all non-regular Council meet inge beginning with July, 3988 through the present date, list iqg the date of the meeting, the purpose of the meeting and the attendance of Councilmembers at that meeting. Wyly, 1988 No non-regular meetings that month. Auauet 33. 1988 Workshop with Chamber of Commerce to discuss a-nsndmerte to Sign ozdinarce regarding neon and Window signs. ^^••^^~+...w.r• nr.unte grown. Rnmwt. Rion. Wpicht. Stout Councilee~bers absent: None Seotemher, +988 No non-regular meetings that month. 0 t b r +988 No non-regular meetings that month. November 1988 No non-regular meetinge ehet month. December 6 1988 Certifying November, 1988 elect iori results end awearing in of new Councilmeabere. Couacil~anbasa psaaapt: Brown, Ring, Wright, stout Councllwaber abusl: BuquK Attentlanw at Non-Regular Council Meetings August 27, 1990 Page 2 December 9, 1988 Oiscuee ion of pereohnel matters regarding Lauren Wasserman. Councileaebera preaeat: Alexander, Brown, Baguet, Wright, Stout Counc ilNebe rs abseat: None December 15. 1908 D iacuesion of personnel matters regarding Lauren Naaeermnn. Covaeileeebers preaeat: Alexander, Brown, Baguet, Wright, Stout Couacileeebere absent: Nana January, 1989 No non-regular meetings the[ month. February. 1989 No non-regular meetings that mcath. March 4, 1989 Discussion of growth mena98ment in Aancho Cucamonga. Councileaebe rs preaeat: Alexander, Brown, Baguet, Wr Sght, Stout Couacilaeebers abwat: None April 5. 1909 D iscueeion of propoeed Community Facilit tee District for Biiwenda Highlands 'fract9 (Ceryn Company). Comcileubers preaeat: Alexander, Drown, Buquet, SCOUC Councilaeebera absent: Wright Aoril 27. 1989 Diacuaeion regarding the setting up of n subsidiary fire dist rict within the City of nencho Cucamonga. Couacileeebere preaeat: Alexander, Buquet, Nright, Stout Coanciluebera abgot: Brown 1 Attendance at Non-Regular Council Meetings August 27, 1990 Pages 3 Mflv. 1989 No non-regular meetings that month. June 15. 1989 Budget workshop. Councilsssbsrs prssea[: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout Coune ilswaabers absent: Wright June 29. 1989 Budget adoption process. Councilssebers present: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Wright, Stout Councilsssbers absent: None July 11, 1989 Joint meeting wit Y. school dintricte. COUncilss~bers prswat: Alexander, Brown, Wright, Stout CouaciLssbsrs abwnt: Buquet Auauet 8. 1989 Joint meet Sng with Chaifey College. Couneilwhsrs present: Alexnnder, Wright, Stout Comcilss~bsrs abssa[: Brown, Buquet 9eatember 12. 1989 Joint meeting with Chamber of Commerce. CouncileaNxre preneat: Alexande:, Bras., WagYa, Stwt COUacilsssbsrs abuat: sagas! September 26, 1989 Joint mating with Planning Commission. Due to lack of quorums, tbs ~atiaq wu eaacslisd. Attendance at Non-Regular Council Meet inye August 27, 1990 Page 4 S ant ember 28. 1989 Executive Beeeion to diecvae poeaible litigation regarding Rock Crusher plant. Counc ilvembers present: Alexander, Brown, Btaut CouuciLembers absent: Buquet, Wright October 10. 1989 Joint meeting with Chino Baain Municipal Water District. Couvcilmembere present: Alexander, Brown, euquet, Stout Councilmembers absents Wright November 14. 1989 Joint meeting with Park & Recreation Commission. councilmesbers present: Alexander, Stout Co uuci Lembers ebsavt: Brown, Buquet, Wright Due to lack of quorum, the City Council adjourned. November 28. 1989 Joint meet my with Planning Commies ion. Councilmembere present: Alexander, Bzown, euquet, Wright, stout Couucilmeabers absent: None November 29. 1989 Di scuee ion of organizer ion and operation of Sheriff's Department. Councilsembers present: Alexander, euquet, Wright, Stout CGLIICilmemberG ibG6a1: Brown December 12. 1989 Joint meet ing with the Cucamonga County Water DLetrlct. Councllmambara present: Alexander, Brown, euquet, Stout Councilmsmbsrs abssnt: WrLght Thm regular maatiaq was eascallmd due to lack of quorum. 1 Attendance at Non-Regular Council Meet Inge August 27, 1990 Page 5 January 9. 1990 ' Joint meeting with the Hietocic Preservation Commission. Councilrrabrra prarrat: Alexander, Brown, Wright, Stout CounciLrrbar abarnt: Buquet Ja ua 24 1990 Nest in9 with Sheriff's Department to discuss law enforcement iesuee. Couacilcerbrrr prrragt: Aiexander, Brown, Baguet, Wright, Stout CouaciLrrarrr rbunt: None February 14. 1990 Joint meeting with the Rancho Cucamonga Comounity Poundation. qur to lack of quorur, thr Natlag war caae611W. Hatch 14. 1990 Joint meeting with the Rancho Cucamonga Community Poundation. Cauncilrrrbrrr prrraat: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Wright, scout CouaC ilrerbrrr abwnt: None Match 28. 199G ' Joint meeting with the Public Safety Commission. Couacilrarbrr• praragt: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Wrighir Stout Couneilrrwbrrr rboat: None Anrll. 1990 Nc nnn-reauiar inaetinga that .^V`nt h. Nav 8. 1990 Joint mratLnq with the planning Commies ion. Cauacihanbrrs praugt: Alexmdar, Brown, august, Wright, stone COVaCllarrbrir rbrmt: Nona Rttandance at Non-Angular Council Heetinga August 27, 1990 Page 6 Mav 29. 1990 Budget workshop. Couacilrerbara prasavt: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Wright, Stout Conncilrarbara abuat: None Junes 7. 1990 budget workshop (capital improvemente~. Couneilaerbara pra cant: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Wright, Stout Councilrarbara aba wt: None J ~ 14 1990 Budget adoption. CouvciLarbara pnaavts Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Wright, Stout Councilrartrrra absent: Nerve June 29, 1990 Salary resolution adoption. Couvrilrarbara prasevt: Alexander, Brown, evquet, Wright, Stout CounciLaabara abaapt: Nana July 4. 1990 civic Center Dedlention. Councilraabara praaaat: Alexander, Brown, Bugvet, Wright, Stout Comcilraaban abwvt: None AA y~19~0 Multi-family development wockehap. COYOCi1NaDaTa prauvt: Alexander, Brown, Buquat, Wright, Stout CouveLirubara abaavt: Nona If you have any questions rsgardinq tha above Lnforme[lon, plop Poi fray to contnci aa. /da urlr ur xarvurluuuunmurvun MEMOT~ANDUM DATE: August 22, 1990 TO: Debra J- Adams. City Cler FROM: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor SUBJECT: ATTSSDASCB AT SOS-SSOlILAR CODSCIL 1I88TISO8 Please provide me with all attendance records of City Coun- cil members for non-regular Covncil meetings for the past two years by meeting type and date. DLS/pr 90-239