Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990/10/17 - Agenda Packet
CTfY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st aad 3rd wedaeui,ya - 7AD µm October 17, 1990 CIVIC CCIIfer Council Chambers 10500 CIVIC Centel Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 •~• City Coaocllmemben DGMia L $tuat, Moyw Panel, J. Wright, covrcir~nlM. Deborah N. Brown, nrayd. nPr.~„ Charlsa J. Begeet, e,.MtrT„„e.r William J. Alexander, c~Kn~e.r Jack Lem, ary Manaeer Jnn:rs L. Markman, c,rv .nn..rr Debra J. Adams, ary cr...r City 089a: 989.1831 [ioN Pvk 980-31 ~3 City Council Agenda PAGE October 17, 1990 1 j All Stpa auWittW for tba City Council Agenda must ba in I writing. Tea deadlinm fos aubaiittiag thew itpa is Ss 00 p.m. '~ '~~ on tba Nedaeadmp prior Lo thm meatiag. The Citp CUrk' a ~ ~II II i~ I Office racmiwe• sll each itpa. i i i ~' II A CAI.i, To OR96R i it 1. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexander __, Stout , I~ i II ~I I ~ crown _, and Wright - ' ~ I I B. ANNOONC~1'PB 8 OBB I LP% QylATI I li 1• Pre eentation of Proclamation Obeerv ing Red Ribbon Week, ' ~ UctoDer 21-27, 1990. ~~I C. Co1010BICATIONB PRnw 's'ma Pt IC I '' Tbia i• iba time and plasm for the peral it I 9 public to addrps the City Guncil. stab law prohibits tba City Council frw addrmuin9 aay isaw not pravioualy Lncludad oa ibe Ageada. '~ '~ I The city Council may rmceivm tutimoay and eat the utter for I I I ''~, • subaaquent maatiaq. Caameata •re to 6e liaitsd to five ~ I ~. i miautsa per individual. I D CoNBp~T •~r~~ i The following Gnwnt GLndar itpa •re expected to be I, routine and eon-coatrovaraial. Thq rill ba acted upon by the Council at oae tip without diacuasion. Anp itp may be i, removed by a Councilamber oe mpber of the audience for ~'~ diacusaion. I I. Approval of Ninutee: 5eptamber 19, 1990 (Brown absent) 2. Approval of Nerrarte, Register Noe. 9/5/90 and 10/3/90, end Payroll ending 9/27/90 for the total amount of 1,898,521.62. ~. Approval to receive end tLU current Investment Schedule ~ ae of September 30, 1990. 4. Alcoholic Bevazage Application for On Sale Baer 8 Ninm bating place for Rancho Thai B.B.Q., Nipe Tongchantra, Vetchern 8ankoaik, Damrong Terukechon, Roritaane Tarukachon, 9581 Foothill Boulevard. 1 11 17 / I PAGE ~ S $ Ciiy Council Agende October 17, 1990 2 ~ ' ' ` ? 0 e y` 3 ~ ~'I 5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sele Beer S Wine 19 I Hating Place for Above Board Deli, Jan and Robert ~I ~II ~ ! Sotlroe, 6614 Cnrnellan. I, 'i 6. I Alcoholic Beverage Application for off-Sala Beer fi Wina i 21 Type 20 for Smart 6 Pinal, 9FA Corporation, 8675 Baae ' i Line Road. ' ~ ~ 7. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer a Wine 23 Batlnq Place for Cherony •a Deli, Gregory Dale Giannaawre I ' I I i, '~,, ~ and Robert Joaeph Martin JY., 9170 Haven Avenue, 1102. I' B. t Approval to authorize the ndvertieing of he "Notice 2 5 ' ' ' I ~ Inviting Bide" for the Milliken Avenue Underpass ~ I '~ Improvement Project, located between Sixth Street antl Jereey Boulevard, to be funded from 58140 Ancount No. 35-4fi37-9030 and RDA ACCODnt No. 15-51000. ~ i i RESOLUTION NO. 90-397 26 I A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNH CITY I OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALI PORNIA, APPROVING i i PLANS AND 9PECZPZCATIONS FOR THE "MILLIREN AVBNUE UNDERPASS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT", IN I ~ SAID CITY AN- AUTHORI EINO ANO DIRECTING THB I i i I I CITY CLEAE TO ADVERTISE TO ASCB SVE BIDS ~ I I i 9. ADDroval of ArtlrL A rLt.. m __--_____; r,,,,,,- "„~ '""- ev "^ !i ', ' ~ ~~ Placel Year 1990/91. '~i ~ ~' 30. ~ Approval to 8xpend Aeaet Seizure Punde. i 33 ~ '' 11. ~ Approval of Landmark Designation 90-04 - Aoth•e Store 36 ~ ~ - ~ antl Poet Office, located ni 7157 Amethyst, as an ~ '~ '~, '. ' Historic Landmark - APN 203-151-01. ' ~ RESOLVTZON NO. 90-398 I 57 ; ` I A RESOLOTION OP THR CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY I i OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~ HISTORIC iJ1NDMAAA NO. 90-04, THEREBY ~~ OESZGNATING RO'TN •S STORE AND POST OPPICE '~ i . ~E.gOWN AS 8IL'iZE'a PLACai, LOCATkn AT 7157 i ~ ~ ~ A!ffiTHYST AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A9 AN ~ HISTORIC LANDMARE City Council Agenda October 17, 1990 race 12. Approval for Vacation of a Temporary 8esement for 69 . 'i Retention BasLn and Drainage Facil it See - Tract 13425 - ' ~' A request to aummazily vacate a temporary easement for ~ li ~ grading and conatrvctlon of Retention Basin, Earthen I ~ ~ Berms and Drainage Facillt Ses, located on the eouthweat ~' corner of Highland Avenue and d9th Street. i II ~I ~' RESOLUTION NO. op_3og I fi0 I I ' A AESOLUTIO OF N THE CITY MUNCIE eF THE CZTY 'i~ I I OF RANCHO CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY j i ' I I ORDERING THE VACATION OF TFffi TEMPORARY ~~ ~ I I ~ ~ EASEMENT FOR RETENTION BABIN AND DRAINAGE it I ! FACILITIES ON TMCt 13425 i I ~' ~' 13. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract 63 ~ I (CO 90-143) for tM Landscape and Irrigation contract ~ I !or Landscape MaLntenance Distticta NOB. 1 and 5 to Lnndecnpe Nast of Maheim, California, in the amount of $97,752.00 to ae funded by Landscape Maintenance Districts 1 and 5 - Account Noe. 40-4130-6028 and 44- i '. 4130-6028, respectively. ii ~ I ~ 14. Approval to nwnrd end suthorizntion io execute contract 65 '~ i (CO 90-144) for the Landscape and Irrigation Contract for Landscape NeinNnenw Distrlete Nos. 2 and 4 to I I i I Landecaps Nut of Mehsim, California, in the amount of <o a< vai Dlatrlcte 2 and 4 - Account Noe. 41-4130-6028 end 43- 1 i 4130-6028, renpestiwly. I I 15. Approval to award and suthorizat ion Lo execute contract ~ I 67 I (CO 90-165) for the Lendecepe and Irrigation contract I I I ~ I ~I ~ for Landscape Maintenance Districts Noe. 3A and 38 to I, ~ Mariposa Horticultural 6ntarprieee, Incorporated of ' i ! ~ South E1 Monts, California, in the amount of $95,731.00 !' to be funded by Landecspe MeinUnanca Districts 3A and I i 3B - Account Nos. 01-4647-6028 and 42-4130-6020, ~ rnpectively. ~ 16. Approval to execute egressient (CO 90-146) with San I 69 ~ I i eeenardlno County Flood control Dietrlet for i i i nutho[izet ion of exwnd in,r~ of Day ~'r?ek om~o~e sand. I I and Approval to execute agreement (CO 90-147) with the Metropolitan Mater District of Southern California (MND) for Planning, Constructing, Meinteining and Vsing Drain i Line Facilities extending [rom MWD ^Lte, which Ss City Council Agenda October 17, 1990 located et the northwest corns[ of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, waatarly, approximately one mile, Lo the Day Creek Channel. City share will tw $545,000.00 of the Loral estimated project coat of $&,545,000.00 using funds already allocated for the work in this Brea fzom the Day creak Project. 17. Annreval to execute a Profcoaional Sen-icea Agreement (CO 90-148) with Enuar Environmental Services for the preparation of a eubeequsnt Bnvironmenta3 Impact Report for Vesting Tentat iva Tract 14475 located north of Almond Street, west of Sapphire Sheet, not to exceed $39,905.OOr with eat aawunt to De reimbursed by the applicant. IS. Approval to Aalsaee Llm Aighta related to reim6uraa+ewnt Agreement for Pcontage Imprcvamente Eor Aaee eaor Parcel Hos. 209-142-16, 209-142-35, 209-14-17 and 209-142-34 located south of Arrow Highwny, east of Vticn Avenue submitted by Barton Development company and Vtioe-Haven Aeaociates. RESOLOTION p0. 90-400 A RESOLUTION OP TNS CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP AANCRO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING LIBN ASONTB AELAT60 TO R62MBURSEMSNT ..___-.-... . .... ...........: __ mwnia ern A336950R PARCEL NUMBERS 209-192-14,209-142- 15 AND 209-i62-94 PAON BARYON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND POR ASSESSOR PARCEL NVMEEA 209- 142-17 FROM DTICA-HAVEN ASSOCSATSS 19. Approval to accept Real Property Improvement Contrnct and Lien Agreement from Lnwronce 6. and Cheryl Pardew for a single family reeidsnes, loceT.ed on the west aide of Seet Avenue, north of Highland Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 90-401 A RESOLUTION OP TF16 CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALSFORNIA, ACCEPTING A x_@.Ai. PF.OPPRTY rHne~ rE ...... ....... Mu LIEN AGREEMBNT PROM LANPENCB 6. ANO CHERYL PERD&W ANO AUTHOASEINC TN6 MAYOR ANU CITY CLEAR TO SIGN THE 9At4S PAGE ii 74 75 77 78 PAGE CSiy Council Agenda October 19, 1990 5 A ~ 20. Approvel to execute Smprovement Agreement Extension for _ Farcel Map 5996, locatetl on Cabroea Place south of Nilson Avenue, eubmiitad by Randolph and sands Oavie. RESOLUTION NO. 9C-402 82 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROV&fENT AGAHEMBNT %%TSNS ION AND IMPROVH!(RNT SBCORTTY POA PARCEL HAP 5996 21. Approvel to execub Improvaewnt Agreement Extension for I 83 Parcel Mep 10295, locaird on Elm Avenue between Spruce i Avenue and Church Street, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 90-403 85 A ABSOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY O! RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVI NC SMPROVEHENT AGReEt01NT %XT%NSION AND IMPROVeMBNT SECURITY /OR PARCEL MAP 10295 22. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Gonda and 66 Notice of Complatlon for Tract 12969 located on the south aide of Arrw Route at Edwin Cou Kt, Aelaaee~ Pnlthful Performance Bond (Streetl c1, a,^^.^_.^_. Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Bond (street) S 11,300.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-404 $~ A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTINC T!R PUBLIC INPROVEMBNTS POR TMCT 12969 AND AUTHORIZING TH6 PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPL%TION POR TTUt NOAK 23. Approvel to accept Improvamenta, Release of Honda and 88 Notiw of Camplatlon for TrecL 13270 eeain f2 located on the nett hweat corner of thatch St:6at and Hiillken .a.•.•enus. Raleeea~ Pnlthful Performsnw Bond (Street) $486,000.00 Accepts Maintananco CuerentN Bond (Street) S 48,600.00 PACE city Council Agenda October 17, 3990 fi RESOLUTION NO. 90-d05 $9 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ~ THE PUBLIC IMPROVEHENT9 POR TRACT 13270 ~ BASIN /2 AHD AOTHORILING TNS PILING OP A NOTICE OP COlIPLSTION POR THB WORE 24. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and i 9p Notice of Completion for Tract 13323 located on the south aide of Lemon Avenue between Baze ac Place and ~ Bemil lon Place. Releaea: ~ Faithful PerformanCa Bond (street) 563,000.00 Accept: Haintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 6,300.00 i 91 RESOLUTION NO. 90-406 A RESOLUTION OP TBE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IlIPROVBMENT3 POA TRACT 13323 AND ~~ AJTHOBIZINC THE PZLING CP A NOTICE CF COMPLETION BOR THE WORK 25. Approval of Improvements, Aalasaa of Bonds and Notice 92 of Completion for Tract 13425, located an the north aide of 19th Street between Naven Avenue and Highland Avenue. Releaea: ~ Faithful Pertormanca Bond (Street) $623,000.00 I Accept: Maintenance cuazantee Bond (Street) $ 62,300.07 93 RESOCgTlox Mo. 90-407 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY 0! AANCNO CUCAMOMOA, CALIPORN IA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC IHPROVElBSNTS POR TRACT 13425 AND AUTHORLE7NG THE PILINn nF p NOTICE OF i COMPLETION FOR THB WORE 26. Approval to release Maintsnance Bond for Tract 13058 I 94 located on the weer aide of Fairmont Nay south of Highland Avenue. Haintenance CuerenCN Bond (Street) ;75,000.00 ~. City council Agenda October 17, 1990 PACE 'I '' 27. Approval to accept Mlghland Avenue Improvement, from 9$ I 'I Haranaa Avernus to Haybarry Avenue, Contract No. 90-073, as egopleta, release the bonds and authorize the City i ' i i Engineer to file a ^NOtioe of Completion". I ~' ~'~ ! I REBOLUTION NO. 90-408 I I 96 I , ~~ I ~ A RESOLUTION OP TFR CITY COUNCIL OF TNS CITY i I ~ I OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING I ~ CI THE PUBLIC IMPROVBMENTS POR THE HIGHLAND I - ', I AVENUE IMPRUVBMBN2 PRQTECT, PROM HEAMOSA I ', I i, AVSNUB TO MAYBPARY AVBNUB, CONTRACT NO. 90- '', ''' !! ~I 073, AND AUTHORIZING TFO! PILING OF A NOTICE ' OP COMPLETION POR THE HOAR i E• CONSENT ORDINl1NC68 I Tba following Ordiaaacaa have had public Daazivga at Lha ti¢a I of first raading. 6acoad nadlvga era axpactad !o Da routiaa i and aoa-coatrovazalal. TDq rill G aoiad upon by the Couvvil at ooa !!u ritbvut diacuatio¢. 7Ta City Clark rill rand tba j title. Avy itq eaa G ra.mad for discuuiov. +• CONSIDERATION OP ENVIRONNENTAi•ASSE9SNENT AND IND STRI i j OJ AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AlRNOMENT NO. 90-03 - CITY OP aNCHO CUCAMONOA - A propoaad amandmant to adjust Lhe noriharn I ~ i ~ boundary of 9ubwraw R nn the wawa .i n. s n...•h..._...- Avenue northerly 330 fast, weaiarly 1,065 fee G, and !! southerly 330 feet to its present boundary with Suberen ' 7, delete the planned ertenelon of Day Creek Boulevard I i I I between Rochester and Hilliken Avenues; and realign a ! ~. portion of Day Creek Boulevard Beet of Rochester Avenue. The purpose of ihie emandment ie to acconeoodate Lhe ~ I development of n City sports park at the northwest I ~ corner of Rochwtar Avenue and Arrow Highwey - APN 229- 1 011-C5r 06, 24, 229-021-15, 20, 28, 34, 41, 42, 64, 45, ~~ 53, 54, and 5B. Tha Planning Cortvnieelon recomoende Laauancs of a Nagat iva Dacleration. ! I I I i ORDINANCE NO. 431 (eecontl reading) 9J ~ ~ i Aq ORDINANCE OP TNS CITY COUNCii OP THB CITI 'i ' OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIPOAN IA, APPROVING I i INDVSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-03 TO ADJUST THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OP SUBAREA 8 ON T!R NEST SIDB OP ROCIfE9TER AVENUE NORTHERLY 330 PEETr WESTERLY 1,065 FEET, AND 9OUTNERLY 330 F68T TO ITS PRESENT BOUNDARY NITN HUNAREA 7) DELETION OP THE 45 City Council Agenda October 17, 1790 PAGE PLANNBD EXTENSION OP DAY CRSSA BOVLBVAAD I BBTNSBN R0CHE3TSA AND MILL IEEN AVENUBSi AND Tlfli REALIGNMENT OP A PORTION OP DAY CRBAE SOULBVARD BAST OP ROCFD:STER AVENGE, AND HARING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT TNEABOP i P. ADVERTIE® POBI.IC HEARIMGB TDe following ite.e, hePe Deen adwrtieed cad/or posted ee public hwringe as required bP law. The chair will open the acting to reaelFe public NRtlaony. 1. CONSIDERATION OP EZPAE89 PINDINGS OP PACT FOR Ina RESIDENT IAL AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS eBCAUSE OP LOCAL CONDITIONS - A resolution, when adopted, which will comply with tN provLion of the Sieie of California Health and Safety Code Section 17953.7. (Continued tram 8eplenber S, 3990) RESOLUTION NO. 90-351 lab A RESOLUTION o! TFDS CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIPOANIA, MAXING EZPRESS PZNDINGS AND DETEAM INATYONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THY CITY'S BUZLDING CODEr A9 ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE PO. 616 ARE REASONABLY NECE88ARY RRf:AnSR OR rlN.A*~ CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITION8 UI AU 112 I ~ SPRINKLBR9 IN ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS AND CERTAIN ' ~ ~ i RELATED ACCESSORY BUILD IN08 ' I ORDINANCE No. 416 (first reading) 116 i AN OM INANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY I of RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORN2A, AMBND ING TITLE 15, BUILDIlIG9 ARD CONSTRUCTION, OP THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING ~, ~ BY ABFEAERCB STANDARDS NSPA 330 AND NPPA i ~i. Ii I I S1P., 90TY. PUBL29fRD BY THE RATIONAL FSRE PROTECTION ASSOCSATION, REQUIRSNC THE i INSTALLATION O! AUTOMATIC PIRB SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IM 71ESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCIES AND CERTAIN BOILDIN(i8 ACCE93oRY THBRBTO, KITH CERTAIN AMENOMENTe, DELETIONS AND 8%CEPTION TO 9AID CODEe ~j PAGE City Council Agenda October 17, 1990 CONSTOEAATION TO DBSICNATB MAI STRHET AS A PRIVATE I 124 STAERT AND 61CEMPTING TlDS AAVTTINC PAOPBATIES PRON REOOIRYMENT3 SET FORTH IN CNAPmBR 12 OS OP TFB NON IC IPA_ i ~d (Continued !rw October 3, 1990) 3. CONSIDERATION TO OBSIGNAT6 LA SENDA ROAD A_NO CAROL SZR AVENUE AS PRIVATB STREETS AND H%ENPTIN6 THE AHUTTING PROPERTIES PROM AEOOIREIgNT3 NHT PORTFI IN CHAPTRR 12 ON OF 'TRB NUNICI PAL CODE (COalinaed fr9e Octobe! 3, 1990) a. 132 A680LUTION NO. 90-409 j 133 A R830LUTION OP TH6 CITY COONC IL OP TF~ CITY OF RANCHO COCAMOI/6A, CALIFOPNZA, ORDERING THE 1/0RE IN CONNECTION NITN FORMATION OP STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. E AND ACCBPTINC T!R FINAL 6NGINHER'3 REPORT POR PARCEL l01P 12354 5, CONSIDBMTION O} 6tNSAONlHSNTAL A93845NE`7T AND VICTORIA i 139 COMMONITY PLAN AN%NDMENT 90-02 - CITY O} RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to aNend the denalty Provision o[ tha Victorle Conunity Plan to reau irw rh.nn.w (- •anG uw designat ions to be approved by City Council. OADINANC6 NO. 432 (flrat rending) ~ 151 AN ORDINANCB OP TN6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNTA, APPROVItiO VICTORIA COMNOHITY PLAN ANEND1fENT 90-02, ANBNDING TN6 DENSITY PROVISIONS OP THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN TO A64UTA6 CHANCES IN LANG US6 DESIGNATIONS TO E8 APPROVED EY CITY COUNCIL, AND HARING BINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 139 VISTA COlHfUNITY pLAN AMRNDNEHT 90-01 - CITY Op AANCRO y^yCAMOMOA - A request to amend the dandty provisions of the Terra Viete Community plan to require changes In lend uee dealgnat ions to be approved by City Council. PACE City Council Agsnda l October 17, 1990 ~ l0 ORDINANCE NO. 433 ~tirat reaalnrp) 154 AN ORDINANCE O) THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ~ OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TEAM VISTA CO)41UNITY PLAN AMENONBNT 90-01, ARENDING THE DHNSZTY PROVISIONS OP THE TERRA VISTA COKKUNITY PLAN TO REQUIRE CRANGHS IN LAND USH DHSIGNATIONS T8 BE APPROVED AY CITY COUNCIL, AND HARING FINDINGS IN 9UPPOAT THHAEOP O. PUBLIC 8611RING8 Tha folloNinq itsa We ao legal publication or poatieg requireANmb. Tba Chair Nill epee tba Netiag to recei•e public batlaaa). No Itema Submitted. p. CITT MA1U10ER'a STAPP REPOATE i The folloriag itaa do not lagall) require ae) public tastiaoa), although the Chair w) open the eating [or public SapuL, 1. REPORT ON ACTIVITIBS NEAR 7'NR vrrrurmv n - ~F~ 2. CONSIDERATION TO H040 PVBLIC HEARING TO RRPROGRAN CDBG 159 1~fl I. CAIDICIL eoaLNeae I Tha follwiaq itue ha•a bane requealad b) the Cit) Comcil j foe dlteuuioa. The) era cot public hearing ilea, although the Chair u) opee the eating for pu611e input. i. CDIIBIDEAATIO OP RE)ERAIN6 THE T Rg pRESERVATION ORDTNANC6 TO TNH 6NVIRONMENTlL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION POR R6VIHN (Oral Report) 2. 1.'ON IDBR TION TD ADOPT A COST N rYSI PO ICY O R IMC ](Q PVBLIC PACILSTI89 ~ 3. CONSIDERATION OP A AEOV68T BY TNR CITY OP FONT NA )OR 151 THE CITY O! RANCHO COCAMONOA TO TAEH ~ PO¢TTION AHOARpINO THE RENOVIL O) HUCar.v_om_rr¢ EEp r~faG INTERSTATE 10 PAGE City Council Agenda October 17, 3940 11 i Thi• i• the Lir for Cit7 Comeil Lo id•atifl the iteu tb•I ~ i ,rich to di•rnss e! tb• east rating. These iteu •111 wt D• i i ~ i diseua•W at tbi• r•Lieg, only idaotitied for the wrt e•etin9. ii it I A. COINNNICATIOItE iRg1 TBe POELIC This to the t1Ne •ed place for the gen•r•1 public 40 •ddpu i the Citl Comcil. Bt•N Lrr pmbibit• the City Cowcil froe addnuiug ••y iuw •ot prniouely i•clwed oe the /vends. i ~ The City Comeil u7 r•Ceiq te•tiroy and wL the rtGr for • •ub•equwt reLi•g. Caernte •ee W Da 3Lited to fire Ninule• per lodiddwl. j ADJOOWII®IT MEfTINO TO 11DJW1N1 TO A JOIRl MEiTIMO KITE TEE PARR 11ND I RECREATIOII COMNIEEIOE CN OLTOEE! 74, 1990 AT 700 P.M. IE TE6 i TEI-CpMOMITIEe CONPmtENCN E0011 AT Tm CIVIC CEETER ' ~ I, Debra J. Ademe, City Olerk of the Clty of dancho Cuceeonge, hereby certify that • true, accurate copy of the forpoinq agenda wu po•t•d on OcLOber 1Z, 1990, wventy-pro (72) boon i ~ prior to th,. m..v ~..q ~. .. __.__.._ __..- -.__.~ .. .ww ~.ivic ~ ' ~ ~ ~' Center OrLv. ~ ~ f l ~ i September 19, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council met on Wednesday, September 19, 1990, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meat ing was called to order at '1:09 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Pre ee nt were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet IT, Pamela J. Wright (arrived e:}2 p, m.~, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: .Tack Lam, city Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry Fu lwood, Deputy city Manager? Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Ana lyet; eratl Huller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Bti ki Scat t, Aseociaf.e Pianner; Tom Grahn, Resistant Planner; Anna Li9a Hernandez, Assistant Planner? Ant hen Nartig, Aes istant Planner; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Bob zetterberg, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Walt Sticknev. Associate F.nninacre aim wag aa..,:..: e«. __ _ ___,_n__ __. _~_~~ „~~.~~ ¢aker, Resistant to the City Manager; chief Rennie Michael, Rancho ,Cucamonga Fire Proter_t ion District) Capt. exu ca 2eicer, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Dehra d. Ad ama, City Clerk. Abasnt was Councilmember: Deborah N. Brown . r ., . s . B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS E1. Xick-Off for the City of Rancho Cucamonga/We Tip Anti-Graffiti Campaign. Mayor Stout stated that at 6:05 p.m., the City held a press conference to kick off the We Tip Art i-Graffiti Campaign in the Council Chambers. . . . 82. Presentation of Proclamat Lon Commending Bill Brownell £or his contribution to public safety ae founder of We Tip. Mayor Stout presented a Proclamation to Bill Brownell, and also recognized hie wife Miriam ae founders of We Tip. City Council Minutse September 19, 3990 Page 2 B3. Presentation of Proclamation to Reserve Deputy chuck Buquei for hie work in apprehending a murder suspect. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Cou nc ilmember Buquet. ~ x Bd. Presentation to Eugene Gilmore for hie service ae Station Commander in Rancho Cucamongfl. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Eugene Gilmore. R • 1 1 P C. COIUIUNICATIONS FROM TBE PUBLIC C1. Jack Nall, 12049 PenPord, Le Mirada, also owner of residence located dt 5128 911ver Mountain in the Woods Development, stated he wne just recently made aware of the problems in the Nordic tract, and asked Lf a structural engineer could also inspect hie home ae of here have been done. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Jerry Grant, 8ullding OlPlclal, and Alek Gomez, Community Development Director, would disease this issue wish him. Mr. Hall introduced Mr. Hi111ame who is in thw nmcaaa of ralrchwwinn hfa home in the Nordic tract. Mr. Hall was given Rick Gomez's business card Lo call him regarding this matter. ~ ~ • • • « D. COBBBNT CALBNDAR D1. Approval cf Minutse: 08-09-90 08-16-90 (Baguet absent) D2. Approval of Warrente, Register Nos. 8/29/90 and 9/12/90) end Payroll ending B/30 /90 for the total amount of $2,046,113.79. D3. Apprcval Lo receive and file carrent Iavaaissat Schedule ae of Au~uat 31, 1990. D4. Approval io authorize the advertising of the "NOtlce Inviting Bida" for tRe Banyan Btreat Improvement Project", located between 8aetwood and Hel linen Avenues, to be funded from Account No. 12-4637-8909. City Council Minutes September 19, 1990 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 90-356 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TH8 "BANYAN STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERE TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to destroy records which are no longer required ae provided under Government Code Section 34090. RHSOLUTION NO. 90-357 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP 'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALZ FORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTAllCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WN ICN ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 D6. Approval of Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Lemon Avenue Storm Dre in end the I6audnCB of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLUTION No. 90-358 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFOANIk, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR TNS PROPOSED LEMON AVENVE STORM DRAIN D7. Approval to award Ptoposal Number PA09091-1 for the purchase of various vehicles under vac ioua account numbers Eoz the City of Rancho Cucamonga. DB. Approval of AgreemenC for installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Edward H. Bailey, Jr. and Patricia W. Bailey and the City of Rancho Cucamonga £or road improvements along the east elde of Archibald Avenue along the Bailey parcel for the Archibald Avenue - south of Banyan Street to Hillside Rcad PYOject. RESOLUTION NO. 90-359 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOA INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM EDWARD N. BAILEY, .,n. n..U PATRTCiA N. BniL-cY AHD AUTHORIZING 'I'Ha MA'ri~R ANi~ otmv CLERA TO SIGN SAME 09. Approval Of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Improvements to Church Street from Sptuce Avenue to Elm Avenue in the Terra Vista Planned Community submitted by Lewis Development Company. City Council Minutes September 19, 1990 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90-3fi0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND S%CURITY FOA THE IMPROVEMENT OF CHURCH STREET FROM SPRUCE AVENUE TO ELM AVENUE AND THE MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN LINE 2- 1 D10. Approval of Final Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Improvement and Maintenance Agreement for the Temporary Private Detention eaein, Development Agreement for Lote 1 throvyh 5 Restricting eu ildirg Permits and Ordering tha Ann®xation to Landscape Maintenance Dietr ict No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 3 antl 7 for Tract Map 13812 located weal of. Et iwanda Avenue between Summit and Highland Avenues, submitted by watt Southern California, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 90-361 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 13812 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13812), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT EECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 90-362 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AND MASNTRNANCF. AGPPPMPNm sno mss mcaononov - ----.. ~~~ BASIN FOR TRACT 13812 BETWEEN WATT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA RESOLUTION NO. 90-363 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR LOTS 1 THROUGH 5 RESTRICTING BUILDING PERMITS OF TRACT MAP 13812 BETWEEN WATT SOUTHERN CALIPOANIA, INC. AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 90-364 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA°.ONGn CAi is ORNiA. vADEAING Trie: ANN F:%AT1nN n^ CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI3TRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 13812 D11. Approval of Drainage Acceptance Agreements, Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securltiee, Maintenance Security Depoe It end Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for DR 89-14, located ai 12167 Arrow Routs, submitted Dy American Pacific Concrete Pipe Company, Inc. (AMPAC). City Council Minutes September 19, 1990 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 90-365 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRAINAGE ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT, IHPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND SECURITY DEPOSIT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 69-14 RESOLUTION NO. 90-366 A RHSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAr ORDERING THE ANNHXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCF• DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STASET LIGHTING NAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DA 89-14 D 12. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for CUP 64-34 located on the ncrtheaat corner of Baee Line Road and Carnelian street, eubmitted by MBWJ Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 90-367 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNC IL Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENS ION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CVP 84-34 D13. Approval of :mpravement Agreement Extension Eor Parcel Map 12218, locateo on the east aide of Hollman Avenue south of 19th Street, eubmitked Dy Hix Development. RESOLUTION NO. 90-3fi8 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND 2MPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 12218 D14. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Banda and Notice of Completion for: Tract 13541 located on Sierra Vista Street south of Cam' o Sur Release: Faithful Performance Band (Street) $ 81,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (5t rest) $ A,300.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-369 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPAOVEMENT3 POR TRACT 13541 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE WORE City Council Hinutee September 19, 1990 Page 6 Per l HF 9192 L d a e 1 t d th= th t Corner of Hiahland Avenue and Rochester Avenue Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $1,443,607.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 144,363.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-370 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA PARCEL MAP 9192 LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION D16. Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 10035 located on the north aide of Camino Predera Street at Ptedera Court. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Hond (Street) $ 24,400.00 D16. Approval to accept Improvement e, Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bontl foz Tract 12642, 12936-94 Storm Drain, located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue hetween Banyan Street and Highland Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 93,000.00 D17. Approval to accept the Intersection of Amethyst Street and 19th St. Street Improvements, Traffic Stgnal and Storm Drain, Contract 99-012, ae complete, releaee the bonds end authorize the City P~q+~e~w tv -__;. ,. .........e ~i Completion". RESOLVTION NO. 90-371 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI,I FORK IA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA INTERSECTION OF AMETHYST ST. ANO 19TH ST. STREET IMPROVEMENTS, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND STORM DRAIN, CONTRACT NO. 89-012, ANO AUTHOAI2ING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOP. THE WOAI( D18. Approval to accept Artow Route Phase II, from Archibald Avenue to Hermoae Avenue, Contract No. 90-009, as Complete, releaee the bonds and authorize Ghe City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion". pcenLVTIO:: nv. 9G-37i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA ARROW ROUTE FHASE II, FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HEAMOSA AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 90-009, AND AUTNORI2ING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOAR City Council Minutes September 19, 1990 Page 7 D19. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ocdering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Diet rict No. 8 and St r¢et Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and setting the public hearing for October 17, 1990, for the Formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. S For Parcel Map 12854, located on the west aide of bast Avenue, between Catalpa and Victoria Street e, aubmittad by Style Homes Company. RESOLUTION NO. 00-373 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 12854, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12854), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 90-374 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR PARCEL MAP 12854 RESOLUTION N0. 90-375 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN IT SAT IISG PROCEED LiiGS FOA THE FORMATION OP STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 RESOLUTION NO. 90-376 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPOP.T FUR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. a RESOLUTION NO. 90-377 A AESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TC FORM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACB FOR HEARING OEJECTIONS THERETO HDTID K. Mvi'6d D'y Aloxdr~deZ, ----iu'dd `iy Euyuei. tG dpMFVVd iid CUnddnt "-.eadaF. Motion carried unanimously, 3~-0~-2 (Brown, Wright absent); with coquet abstaining from voting on the August 15, 1990 minutes. x x e e ~ e City Council Hinutea September 19, 1990 Page 8 H. CONSHNT ORDINANCES E1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONIffiNTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA - An amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan pertaining to the proposed removal of existing Eucalyptus windrows as a result of the alignment of Summit Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue and other street alignment e. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 424. ORDINANCE NO. 424 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THF. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGP., CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01, AMENDING PIGURE 5-13 OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buguet to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 424. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Brown, Wright absent). # # x # + # E2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIPIC PLAN AMENDMEN 59-03 - C TY O N U O - A reque et to amend the circulation clamant of the industrial Specific Pi an (Subarea 5j for the de ietion of Seventh Street between Hermosa Avenue and Center Street - APN 209-261-09 and 30. nnhrq d. Adamu. (`i TV !'lanY nnnq !Fn !ills nF nMln~nna 4n M19'f ORDINANCE No. 427 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03, AMENDING FIGURE II-3 AND FIGURE IV-7, AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to waLve Full reading and approve Ordinance No. 427. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Brown, Wright absent). • # # # M # .... CONSIDERATION ~F AIi O DiiinriC'c _Rc-iNSIAiiNG PROViSiONS OF 'rriE BROw7i AG7 RESCINDED EY TNF STATE r.rGISLAT RV~ Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 428. City Council Hinutee September 19, 1990 Page 9 ORDINANCE N0. 428 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCfi0 CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING NEW SECTIONS 2.12.030 AND 2.12.040 TO CHAPTfiA 2.12 OF TITLE 2 OF THH RANCHO CUCAMONCA MUNICIPAL CODE, THEREBY AEQU IA ING POSTING OF AGENDAS AND PROVIDING OPPORTUNITIES FOA THE PUBLIC TO AD-REHS THE CITY COUNCIL MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by baguet to waive full reading and appro.•e OrdLnance No. 418. Motion carristl unanimously, 3-D-2 (brown, Wright absent). P. ADVERTISED PVBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90- O18 - PITHS SI /DALMAV ARCHITECTS - A requeaC to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from office to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 3.56 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church street. The City will also cone ider. Neighborhood Commercial and Low-Medium Ree ident ia7 ae alternat i.ve designations. (ITEM TO EE CONTINUED) A.M°NO: D:NT '0- 2 P A HI TS - A request to amend the Dev¢lopment DieCrict'e Nap from "OP" (Office/Professional) to "H" (Medium Resident is 1, 8-14 dwelling unite per acre) for 3.Sfi acres of land located ar the "___„o ...,r uer of Arohi bard a..,.^t[ q, .;,,u~cn street. The City will also^coneide!r "NC" (Neighborhood Commercial) and "LM" (Low-Medium Residential) as alt e:^native designations. (ITEM TO HE CONTINUED) Mayer Stout stated there is a request for th i.e to be continued indefinitely. Brad Boiler, City Planner, suggested this be continued to November 21, 1990. Pete Pit asei stated he is representing the applicant and ie asking fcr th¢ continuance at their request. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Baguet to Continue the item to November 21, 1990. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Brown, Wright absent). ! k fi • t 1 F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDVSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 - EAAMAEIAN - A request to change the designation from Suba.cea 4 to Subarea 5 for flue scree of land located an the south aide of 6th Strec!t, approximately 470 feet sae[ of Archibald Avenue. Staff report presented by Anna Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner. City Council Minutae September 19, 1990 Page i0 Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public heariny. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 429. ORDINANCE NO. 429 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECI P]:C PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION FROM SUBAA::A 4 TO SUBAREA S FOR FIVE ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 6TH STREET, APPRO%IMATELY 4i0 FEET EAST OF AACHIBALD dVENUE MOT It,..: Moved by Huquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reeding and set second reading for October 3, 1990. Motion carried unanimously, J-0-2 (Brown, Wright ab senC). • • • • • ~ O. PVBLIC HBARIN09 G1. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOIi COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IHPRO NTS } AE ULATIONS FOR FANCY Staff report presented py Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer, who commented the Ordinance the Council would be consider Llg Tae been revised, and that they had a new copy which was dietributetl to thorn. Ma Vnr St.da nnenwfl tha mnaf inn_ fnr nnhllr heal nn_ Thnro hninn_ nn . •eo public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerkr read the title of Ordinance No. 430. ORDINANCE NO. 430 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RAIVCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 15.45 TO THE RANCHO CVCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDS FOR COMPLETION OF PUE LIC IMPROVBMENT3 AND REGULATIONS FOR OCCUPANCY OF HUZLD ItiGS AND STRUCTURES MOTION: Moved by euquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and set aaro^d raadiGy for Gctoter 3, 1910. MOLi0ii Curt led unanimouni_v. 3-G-2 i6rown, Wright absent). 1 • A • t F city council Minutae September 19, 1990 Page 11 B. CITY IOINAOEA'8 BTAFF REPORTS H1. CON D O A I C V G N G - A request for pOllcy direction regarding a potential Landmark Designation for the Bear Gulch area which would include the Sycamore Inn, the significant trees, the Oeo Bear statue and potential archaeological resources (the site of the proposed Sycemnre Village project) but exclude the Red Chief Motel and Cnfe. (COSLinuW ftc~ eayte~Der S, 1990) Staff report presented by Anthea Hartig, Assistant Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the Council was: Richard Crane, stated ha appreciated the opportunity to work with staff and that he agrees with the campramiee that was made. Mayor Stout asked for the other Councilmembere to inform hlm on whet was tliecueeed at the last meeting. Councilmember Buquet gave a brief overview of the discussion that took place. Mayor Stout stated he ie in agreement with the compromise proposed. Councilmember Buquet stated hs appreciated the cooperation between the property owners and staff. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to accept staff's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Brown, Wright absent). • ~ • • ~ H2. CONSIDERATION OP IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION POR TRACT 12462 DETENTION BASIN. I.OCATBD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OP SUMMIT AVENUE BBTWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND S UB Staff report presented Dy Pnul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer. Councllmember Buquet naked if this was for the completion of the detention basin. Paul Rougeau, Traff lc Bngineez, stated yea. Mayor Stout asked if the City's legal rights were protected. V WfWa MatRnlan. L1tJ ALtOCne V. OLflted Vea. RESOLUTION NO. 90-378 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUHCIL OP THS CITY OP IUNCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVTNO IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ERTENSION AND IMPROVEMERT SECURITY POR TRACT 32462 DETENTION BASIN City Counc ll Nlnutes September 19, 1990 Page 12 NOTIONt Noved by august, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 90- 378. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-7 (Brown, Wright absent). N3. NS IDE ION TO A PROVE NI 9 SASTEA P XES U ISS THE STATE Staff report presented Dy Jeck Lam, City MflnageY. Nayor. Stout naked if once these are submitted to the State, can the City make changes later if they desire. Jack Lam, city Managsz, stated yea. MOTION: Noved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve the nine disaster plan annexes for submission to the State. Notion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Brown, Wright absent). x ~ • w • + H4. CONSI EAA ION TO AP %A ON G 0 - Reque et to approve the Tax Revenue Rxchange for annexation proceedings (LAFCO 2626) between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately 2,556 acres of urbanixiny territory in the area generally located north o: the exist ing City limit, east of Etiwanda Avenue and west of the existing boundary of the City of Pontane. Staff report presented by Niki eratt, Aeaoc fete Pianner. Nayor stout questioned what the County ie offering compared to whet the hi wtnri cal amount iw. Miki Brett, Associate Planner, eiatad that the historic formula ie now 6.38, Dut used to be 4.9t, that ie has gone up. Jerry Pulwood, Deputy City Manayer, stated that the County has their formula based on historical rotes, which was praviousiy 4.369, end that based on negotietione that the City had entered Ln before, they offered 6.36t initially) however, they have modified their posit loo and offered 3.3t. He stated the problem with this Se they have net clearly looked at the level of service or the potential coat to the Ctty for providing service to that area, nor the fact that the City Dad 1n the past received the basic tax rata formula. He stated this pate the Clty in an awkward position. Mayor Stout stated that lagislet ion wee passed approximately two years ago that net up a fcrmula, which c.ar tiara would iDCxeasa EDe Citv'n property tax rote. It incrementally, up to a maximum of 7t. He asked if Sn a few years, would the city~a increment kick in eo that Lha City~e Lncrement would start. Jerry Pulwood, Deputy Clty Henager, stated that was correct. Mayor Stout naked if newly annexed arena elide up that scale to 7t Jerry Pulwood, Deputy City Nanagar, stated they would. City Council Minutes September 19, 1990 Page 13 Jack Lam, City Hanaqer, stated that just recently et the State level there was an action to reduce the amount to the no- and low-property tax cities, cutting them back to 90\ of what they received the year before. He stated that was with the understanding it would be a one year only cut in order for the State to balance its budget, however, he stated in the fall there should be another assault on this bill that would make this cut permanent. He stated in rheory the City would get up Lo the 78, but stated that because the City ie alteady up to the 6.5\, it would have been the fifth year before the City realized any additional taxes. He eteted in that five year period, it can eaaily disappear. Mayor Stout etaind if the City authorizes the negotiations tonightr something final would have to come back to the Council at a later date, and asked how much time does the City have for the negotiations. Hiki Sratt, Associate Planner, et ated this can go on until the City has considered and approved an EIR Decauee the City cannot go fozward with the annexation until that happens anyway. She stated it would ba three to four weeks before an EIR can be circulated, and then another 45 days after that. councilmember Buqust stated that it appears to him in hie review of this and what the County is doing as far ae the differential, that the County Couneal has set up a growth management task force, entl one of the things they have been looking et ie increasing developer fees and increasing shares of revenue to cover library services, flood control, fire protection, and a lot of other things they have in their affected jurisdict lone. Hs asked if ii appeared Chia is part of that effort. r ...., wondn.a~.n. sr: nom: nal Dlanner. at atwd the county ie nl avlnc a new Dame, and ae it was explained to him and Jim Hartr Adminietrat Lve Services Director, by the Countyr they ate Daeically saying Chia ie what the figure of basic taxes to the City is after you take Ln the services currently being provided in the area. This woultl take care of the current esrvice levels with no new development at 3.38, which means there Se a difference of 48 that they indicate they would split with the City, which ie what the new service level becomes. He stated this is different than anything Lhe city has ever heard before. He wanted to make clear this tax formula dcee not include special taxes, i.e.r flood control of any special improvement district tax. He stated it does not take any money away from those. Jim Hart, Adminletrative Services Director, et ated after he, Larry Henderson and Miki Brett met representatlvee from the County eo they could explain the 3.3\, he stated whet they have done is taken the 6.368, which Le the City's general tax rata that ie received and 1- the tax rats for that area, and they ors saying they will spilt that with the City under an agreement that wee made in 1985. He eteted that Le where 3.38 Le coming Pron. He stated the problmn Se they ere taking the city's share end dividing that in hal P, and keeping half of Rancho cueamonge'e, plus whatever they are getting above whet Rancho Cucamonga is getting. He felt they were trying to slow the City down on the annexation or something along Lhat line. He eiaied he knows there to something wrong, but Lhat staff Se trying to figure out what, and will be communlcetinq this to the Adminletrative Offices of the County With a proposal. CSly Council Hlnutee September 19, 1990 Page 16 RS SOLUTION NO. 90-379 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY 04 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, DETSAMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX ASVENUES TO BE E%CHANGBD 9ETWEHN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OP BAN BERNARD INO AND THE CITY OP PANCHO CVCAMONGA ASSULTING FRON TH8 JURISDICTIONAL CHANGE DESCRIBED BY LAFCO NO. 2626 NOTION: Moved by Alexanderr seconded by Buquet foz staff to negotiate with the County for a different formula. Notion carrietl unanimously, 3-0-2 (Brown, Wright absent). R R R R f R X6. CONSIDERATION OF AN INCREASE IN HO IMPROVE NT PROGA MINIST ATIVH S RVIC- NTAeC* - The approval of en amendment to the Professional Services contract (CO 90-013) with Willden Associates to authorize an increase in the Home Improvement Program administrative services portion of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Hnyor Stout inquired ae to how the program works and what the Clty is doing to help out. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, went into detail on the things this program Se involved with. Counc {,imemt+er At ore^do. aavoa is .n...... . . _.. .,__ _ ~ _.. _o ..o-~.e~ ... y...y. ,~. Lorry Henderson, Principal Planner, etnted Ln next year's Hlock Grant Appllention there will probably be a recommendation to the Cou nail to possibly up the $80,000.00 an~i do lees curb and gutter work in some of the areas, to try to get the backlog of housing problems taken enre of and out of the way. Mayor Stout euggestecl when the CDBG item comae around next year, he would like to see altaznatlvee expressed eo the Ceuncii can choose what the money le to go for. MOTIUN: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve etnff's recommendation. Not icn curried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Brown, Wright absent). R R f R R R I. COUNCIL BUSIN888 I1. DISCUSSION OF DATES AN^ •TTaw^ COUNCI TINC WITH COMMISSIONS AND OTHER AGHNCIE9 (COellaued frw eepteWer 5, 1990) staff report presented by Meyer Stout, who eteted It ie difficult for everyone to be at all the spacial meet lugs, and would like for the Council to consider that if only two Councl lnremhere ere present, and theca le not a quorum, to not city Council Minuses September 19, 1990 Page 15 have an official meetingr but continue with the diecuaelon eo the meeting does not have to be postponed. He felt this was important because there are eo many meetings it ie difficult to rearrange the schedule. He felt the Counellmembare that are present at the meeting can report back to the not Lre Council aDOUt what took place. 6e added he would like for the Council to think about hie suggest Lon. counellmsmber Alexander euggaeted that possibly Home of the special meetings De combined so that there would not have to De eo many meetings. Mayor Stout euggaeted that regular Council items not be carried over to the special meetings. Councilmember Huguet euggaeted that the time frame be expanded to one meting every two months so that the entire schedule would take two years instead of one. He also euggaeted that possibly a Council subcommittee gc to the meetings instead of the entire Council, end then report Dack. ACTIONS Neport received and Elled. J. ZbLNTI RCATIOII o- ITO19 fOa MELT MELTING Jl. Mayoc Stout asked that lnformatlon coma back to the Council on the Clty having Lt• own Housing Authority. He added this could cane beck in a meinorendum to the Council instead of being on the agenda. Jack Lan, City Manager, stated staff would prepare en informal report on Houeinq Authorities and how they are set up, etc. Ha added once the report ie given to the Council, they could decide how they want to proceed with this. u • a J2. Councilmembex Buquet wanted an announcement made that an October 25th there will be a Gang and Drug Education Progr. am at Alta Loma Niqh School to be sponsored by the City. He felt coordination should be done with the School Diekricte. Jack Lem, City Manager, stated the City will be doing a publicity campaign on this. J3. Councilrsr..et A16xaader aak6d for a rEyOZt Gf What 11 wuu Ld Ldke, and tfle coat to utilize recycled pep¢r. Jnek Lam, City Manager, stated that about one year ego a report came to the CouneLl alai inq that because of the facility the Clty wee in end the inadequacy of apace, Lt wee eacidad to wait until we moved io the new Clcy Hall. Ha etsced the City Le Ln the process of tees lay Lhe paper to see whl ch brand ie compatible with our n~echinee. City council Minutes September 19, 1990 Page 16 Councllmember 711exander suggested that somewhere on the front of the paper Lt should note that it is recycled paper. Jack Lam, C?.ty Manager, stated when the next budget is reviewed, staff intends to point out the cost factors and what they would prnpoee to purchase or not purchase along with coat factors for the Council's consideration. Mayor Stout stated he has a copy of n model ordinance from tae National Recycling Subcommittee of tae National League of Cities which proposes an alternate modification that would require recycling centers or facilities in each multi-family housing type of unit, venally newer buildings, and also commercial buildings. He stated he would Like eteff to see if it would be worth doing this in Rancho Cucamonga. He eeked if this would go tc the Nnvironmental Management Commission or the Plsnning Commission. Sack Lam, City Manager, et ated this particular ie sue would go to the Planning commission. Mayor Stout euggeated this be coordinated with the Bnvironmsntal Management Commission since they were working on recycling Saeuee. Jack Lam, City Manager, eteted this would De done. ... •w• Councilmember Wright arrived et 8:12 p.m. •~~„~• R. COMMUNICIITIONB FROM Tffi PUBLIC Rl. Sack Lam, City Manager, announced an Executive Seeaion ie requested to discuss pending litigation. R2. Jim Proet eteted he just came from a meeting at Alta Loma High School on the Vietnam Memorial Dedication to be held on November 12, and advised that they hove just located the 6th and 7th families of the gentlemen killed ae a result of the war. He etlded Je6ae Lobock's name has been found on the list. Ne further eteted they thanked the City for their contribution, but stated they were fruetratad et what happened et lest night's Foundation meeting. 'n3. 'vu ens Glaee, iGii9 Stratton Cou rr ,. at sled no tivca In a Herdic hoa!e and has requested in tae peat en inspection of hie home eo ha will know if it le safe or not, but has not received the inspection. He asked when the inspection will be done. Jack Lem, city Henagar, stated he should wprk with Rick Gomea, Community oevelolxnsnt Director, who could meet Aim right after this meeting. City Council Minutes September 19, 1990 Page 17 Jamee Msrkman, City Attorney, pointed out that he has more than one home in Nordic, and thought those hweae had been inspected already. Mr. Ghee elated that wan correct. « . ~ . + . L. ADJODRM03NT MOTION: Roved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to adjourn to Bxecutive Seeeion to diecuee pending litigation. Executive Seeeion to ndjourn to a joint meeting with the Environmental Management Coamiseion on September 26, 7:00 p.m. at City Mall. Motion enrried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Brown absent). The meeting adjourned at 5:18 p. m. Reepectfully eudeitted, Debra J. Adams, CNC City Clerk Apptcveds ,' : : .I . P P P oN .PNNPnPPpn.eNPPOmPN~~oPPePWNPepPOWNPmJ PNmC a PnNO1 oJN.. a•N ew~w n ° z ° ° N N I..N Na a...P . .i -mow mN J a e NTr NN N N y .I nNn N w n V ~I ~NMN NnJ nY• Ow n ftl~ ~ n L! •DI "i" JJnmph Nti OmP NmP mmS POwNV•N<FmPOn nJFOPOHNm• 'B.ea nnnnnFnFnnhnnnFl~ nnnNn ~ OJ•aVJV V•J 1••IVVV••'IJ••V11•ViV~aI••JafJaJ•1• a1JJ••a IVIl1 i I ff • •a _ Of.•• V. w O N • u O i ND \ Wi O J <LV 60 V VJU M tl J J wf ) OS 6pf u n1-w ) Z w N OL 0 n NV uP Z O 2 V z VV P v nVOV v 2PJ V O V _ 7 2 J u N rv i _ Yi m z S mew mow.). u!o N LL 2 _ V O .u ui mJ iW m ~ i U l 12~ u0 NP a2F 1t >2 w ~ _ \ n J LL30av n J~ x J n{ mF zOSSVNar2iG1 io: ~ ~+ zap xo .zz .. iom JiW :~.'. ¢ n N y ~i 2 J i _ tla u F i JV ma O C~n Jr i N y z N w i u SV Lr ¢PS w pV LL F i Jvv •~NL ml L 2 = O W J «~ `I F9Vf 9 i . 101 ti P29:iz1 INNLwLi ' ¢jJ ~ t LL\ f Y'LZ fM .n < N„ i2YVn¢arf »mVnVUJ¢FOJaayuPmTnw[i N.wn VPLIVaWtt 2 ~ Z S u f Z N l Z l P ~+ J V J . 2 '~ rV NUNn 3 ~.JN - 2~N v ~` z snnoooln r a o Z• L4uuJ a[ NV 2 f 1 J f uJwVV6'YW JAY Jy f. 1Wu ~! {pl0¢)N F'u fOf¢^ vin l~ ~N OS•f N p JVf ¢f iifOYV U nZ u ~y y n p wi sL6 NFN CY }yy~Jy YWN¢WiJ~ ¢O~ V/ 7~VUVJVXO yfN VLLLaa 2RJW V NVf O uULOf w J n z O UO i -~W ¢n_ LLOWON• YSf 00 yf•ffviMN WOIWF ::O ~. JzUN •2VJiJMVVVUJywFOs V • f11~ eLU 7wNJ YJ{WO{t22Y J O Y OZizu yOM1Ni •J lw ~pJ OVrlOOON YNN nW j O Ze JiOW SoOnyy[n 19'.Lii L11[OWP wnJw~ZwNONV yf S ~t~ O SO V¢¢LNOn^12 jVr•N iO M Mf LJf•JM1 VI FIN JVJWFJ FIW WJYNNii fJL2FJNJpN jWpyiUVVUNJJL>Y •S• N L ) tG : fff(\ffffLflfOCONOee00lUVVUVVVYyUUy0000000 I ~ ~ ~ O• • O P tiON„: ^PN000+IO nwTnONPONPNI•OPIIM1JVNNNYPIIINyF ~O~ N J NF n •POOryO•O•NPY•00•w100 p~JIMIM000P•TNOR• •O• •L• • T w w N O O•NN NO.~IO•OOOPJJOOON O w10 ~ PNVI••O MNV N •w• HN• NN iI11J • • NN • WI I>/ 11 / aNa °ma °o ec°p ° riorrv~rov _ _"ii_ _ _ _ ~: N .. NN fN _ - ~ _- N ~... N a N . T .. N » f .. f ~i: NanpPeNNT+TanaPeNNm+NandPe..NTaNanPPO.. ~a~~;ssas;nPTaPaaaaaaaaa;aaaaaa;;aTaaaa~~ e•a+.•aa•a+:i...e+.+aaiaiiiiiiaiii•ii••aiiiiiiwiia.• V d ~ IP ~ vp n O a_ a. Z uZf O OI j ~ Jj Z in ~ i W y w m rl - V N u iF v F uu puS3= JZ NSJfP d cur d ~ u Z ~~ ti Si ti~7 ~U r~ JAY _ w u a aJ0 J ~~ J[~f• _ >ZU HfY00 felts NV7 EZ >ZT nrZ O ~ ___ w u2i pjn [Ou d7EJ rt2~ ~SLL Nn ~ZJ ti~Otif N > fL ) eVti J ~ aeu JJtir pIF ~ ~ LLN a of nP uNLLjNNJSn rt 22 OujnJJyV nNOa>raOr rcfidfLLNJ>afawnun>[~w~~6tlNOOf a'DJJZJf Li/i>N I O YrEi2 ~ =0 wwwa J n ~w 9J00 j SN N Y JNON oJ• {fi /~]90PSJ Spn O rtN yJ df~SN d i f~ tlNZ~ wu>J J fN+ a i4 y n~»0 rtNy u>'IQ ~dJi w~~JJJSifJJ NL • ~ nNwwN2H ud ONfr=+ 6 OJf G JJJ'JdGM dJNJ+. OLLi ~n ZN)NZ w Kw '=f.J \~w LL O_uOJ>ssNWNf= w d OiV+• 001Nt Of:SMN:J~NUwLLitw~1Z.J• N \LL7> fV~nOSHN ,O JZ1 Z• OO_ :JAN<tiZfl •O OOO ZdWWwN fu NH Vllp ~VdVN Nf1Z-w ZWZ Nn O> + VWOZOVi=ti i OVMMJ f H1N. N WiNNNWFN Z1LLl Owtl f+W y ppff ~t~ JJYyWJ6N)uNOtl J06JJ3Z+NWJON:WJJJJNNdN~OV:)M)NNYVpYdi ~i• OOOOOOWWwWLLLLWLLLLLLrWLLJpJOEZES.IN Uww.Zl std ZlZ[12L Ip[JJJJJJJJJtZZ 'd• P1n TN Pm an nmNaOmOnOm+NN+NNNPPO0y01nTOPnaMOaONO ~O~ aFhn OlN+fNN+NP~mPNN+IOmNOTPIPPMNNn~InNNnITnTN1001nN •O• aNryONOnNwO +TOTNNNONjMNTN•m m NTMNH.IN NPN~%IOmlil N ~S• • • +NNrI ~~ a wIN = nX m J rv rv r!N •• rwNNJdN n \~ N N r N N nm nrN nIN N~pnlP P~P TT1S mPmn hn w nFn hhY iiaiiiii iiia iii i ° .rr.+a.....e.r+.. f+al.l o.r.+.]. ..i i ai+.. ... .. .. ....• F. r " . ~ s m ~ u x o u z ~ w + o N L ~v i c i L r ~ J T .• u h L u a. Y.ma ~ z°o Nz. mz. o _ _ V[ wil[ V :JU \l LL r2 u 2 V _ OJ > _ - L7n uL ~Yp 7 ~N ~~ p V 1 •~ u n vE Z _ U EC n..l \V'w nJr N ?~~ YJ [ZU u~ u V J ~ ~n u ~ VLL v ] + Nloy i ++ M .. ']J\ CTLL .u+~JU uJ•[Z ZSJ u JTU nNJ YL J.] mIN ~YY J rYY.Ji tZr N u]JyVhZ r r iJJ >hw}Z+VU~[rV NLLfym(4J~rYm~]PODU.nnJUUJih~N'-nJmrZVpu.NVZL Sy S2 pJJp7 JJJJJ J i JJJ r n a tl E n .2. ~ a ~ N n ,.. ,.. ,.~ ~ .. z zN _ r A f ~ ~ 25 U 1 rr nrr V fONi~ X nr N Y u u' 9 O i rc .O ONOn Z f . 7J2 _ o~J Vz w ~ N 7f N~ • N, ~ tl ~v7 U w YJ 20?o Z W YJF 'm O m r 9 ••=NUVJ wn• V 0Nr` YNn•n r4Www V6 •Fwrvwz3 un y V~ OU r LVr;wzrfL • r9fwLL [O p rVNJwL JUZVVwuwLL tiyu OVF OVV aJ n u uLL N w v w91v J •rz w •V 1V• •zOtlrM•a y .wi NJ •w• Ul 4lO N a 4 V ' O •'uw p ONi ZffN wi iW^J vv_ uOl J±JJJ •n~2vOpZ •} Or rmJ Z Oz~ORJNVWmV.pt F fff O.Iw JWW(OW•~ ~ L ~(• Yf• ¢ W F LLO p J J NWZ vUVVUVyLL~]f rZhf w•]p ~[ uyjGVVfwVJ6 O>(Wp IJ Yi uV::S fOy Oa[WV]IJNMJU rOOf vlfff2rOVa r~ • dUwZr OOOp 01•PfON (LLYfWn Ili] t(z[zOVp66GC(OLL>vv6avvR NNNNNin N~~NNNNNNNNNrrFFppy(zZ A •(] 0/1ry ONPlNImmPryPMNmmONdddNry. •1P NP.LNhryNryryNdN pPI'1NlP PI]~N ]O] .O..n9lmnNgl•.dOOmnrONOA ONNdOVNnNnmwl d.]TnoONePrNn ]ii •10NhmwN nvwNid rpiNrdfdNYnd4mNnNdarr~.li NwdN +•Pld dwltNnm ' ^; ' 3 • naNre ~: m v ~: a"riii~+ ~:o o) • z~+ ~ r~ i foes a s v i z :i °z si zo~siu w w ~uouoro ~)) Wu :W a:sa)W .)3 ea)aW: ~j• )))yNN +e• asN~ o+ eeee~ ~~~ °aoneT."+i I + W • /, r, +f1 iNP ~fe yYn O f •• iZ ~LLO hp~wa Jr rY L ;; •. e ° weee.oe o onweATeeoesoewneraaeoNOewheeeea i«i m o ° oNeeNeo ..+hnwenwoNOewlnl+weeeesrwonreh 1(1 .f1 a«I~er~<« o io.+awu«Iie «i~lni «e.e«-~i«naa a v~«e.'i+i« o z - w .. ennn nN wnN+nw+Nw wlw .i a .. .. .°n•`n's«`' T n w«w11w o + wee ww \i w y < N N nf« Wi p• A A n A r\ A ~~ A T A {M~{wll •~++w•+Lww r10~ J•NAN+<hOw04NA1NA10wNA1A+hOnOwNT•N+1.OwO+NTIMVPOP°••NA ~Z~ ZOe•r0lwwe OOVO hr N A wiwiii~iei~Z•+oraEFrnrwwrrrrrwiiiiirrr{rrwiwrrw a rsr• /(• O••111•1111•••e••flfl•111.11•y11.1111•+••111111111•1 1fY '/ r / el 1 I I • 1+101 O 000 • O ~ ~ S 1 = ti .N•f aan O Oi 1.~ +WN 1 V: w w Jf O>IOr W ~NN N O / / h Ww NY<wr O ~nR 0W I v V VIVY(t' O{VMViV~ O (riNWO YJ \ YO.O N\ N / V VpVJrYf _hyWVYVaW Vr i (f YAP_Y L`nl N NhOJ a L~i~ p'• 6 4 YV N~VLO M~J'JJ• WYWw • j i VO<W• W W OW •j JhLi JN rW~ > wY\ I V JyY.U WO'I ~ \ r1WN fr WO .((N •OY~Sir.W[W{YF~\ r N [f M`° J f `hy4 y0 V NI• • trwYY O~JYVP w~ 1~I~A W „ •N MN u11P1~4Y _90 NW WO{On9W I^1 C J Y O Z •w ~N J + J N ~ ~ MVw P e : nnW< Zyw WIL °~` W L Of LOL\ ~YZ iri P L N L i~ ffOL J 'Ji>'J <`yP(WOON OZLr:i ZL 1y/ O ° O O O> i • • OWiN f O(V:J O NWLN7(h' .L fp = r h•• p:Y. IY :>L . FLNaW1.3Nh~JN y 1 L •. ••W{26Y HI•<YNWWrWWZWJMUL W W pWfNZfZOiN •U/ y 1. NVZi w t WiMNZO VUWrfUJ 9r ZJJUJ°(n A W V » Z° ZJWi lift iWNN Z~O~p V VLWJh O i N O• Ww ~ ~ C JWOfO »OLN h ~V OSY ° ww°YUY° rZJrNOihO fNwY~WNf 7JZrM° (~O Vf • 1 J r LLN.~O6 O N O~Y>ZMf ZNLNM U>LwfViMii i/pr Iii Y Uu pYJLL > ~ YW>JMW9rOMiMMiZi7iY0'J<O77Nf •. • iWWi{OFOWL06NLL{W.+(+hLLOOWLyJiO H i OS~OW(W N a wjuJ ONyhJ}W°JpLJYWiJMWWfOWWY 1r • N£ P y/~LwP W i IYfWOYf Of •p0{Ln°LOltLy6r{NZrNNy O 1 i V • n 1 ZN W ~ .Zi N N N { f t ° W ~ ii W7 (W r ~1 V N h ~ ~ p u 2F JJ S~ ~ 1°IJWr •i_r 3£ •JV LUL Yi O • >iu wJiY NNL wNr y N fNW ~ M• U~iO L ~~wvP1WJ '/NV \ i ~r s er f f:~ pry yf u h ~j Wy WiJh=WV ~ Y NOY ~ ii~_C_ WW f ~ # "~~3ySou~a5g34 rN 'I •.rdrw wrs°r O > FN ehr W LWUVif w(Zf OeL Jh W7NFNi •((f I a f WWZN lJ.. pZMWNyN LVJ_f OiNJ>•.f 0°• F y r L ZiZ ~± N t `ONWOZiNiVJMVYUZS[ M~V~~{M°OfF I FL•' r LW MJOM f MMeeN • 1 fyyy LIy ~W~ i > > NM •K< OW a0.'b.~~irriNSwy ~1- fpy~JiOi /i/ N Z M N yYWWV > U NVYJWMh VP JWWWYtriO VYYeKJii• 11 i JK• •OrVYyJJJJJ((iZOiNNN•l f\O<ff{{ /i•• > O N O 35~91f YY W £ yffff<fffffyf 4f <ffOflf rrrOww000 / /r/ M A N T °°°OMIA ' O Nh•n1•nOOn°°OONN•hAAMTIP•Pw+h /01 O N NnAAn1A E{N Nhw:w•OOwTnwwMrOOrwMlawMlwO /01 O O O O ATOO•hM N O J 1 'Iw Owww1•n1Mw•.wTwnTOwwrMN 1W~ • O • +O n e T N N NTA11•ww NIwIw ••w •• ••.1 1>/ 1 1 a iNP Y2nif Vi0 Sfr QOM YNw Orb JJLL :s: \. wt O• Z. •A• C. t ~Wt •i• ~ ~ t0• ~ f t ~>• re„elpepNrppwpeNNp neeNeeNneNyeaeaoaoooaeyeeowYY.. ry{eerylleweewloloYpwYpyenrewe0en•ooro~aawerea EN NPOOM^..>w^OnNwNNnNeNyyNwNMNONwYNO~.w NJ•~w n.ewa Pnw'»wNaaNN n ry+.. wNaajNN IN•N Nf N~•aArN NIy a-Jaa NI OY an M N =n Nn N r nN N ry ryN Na>iIO..NnaNaNYIOyNna00N ilOM NIIIa NaM1Y>eNNTaMaM1OIOMNTa Ja ~:7RRiiiiiiiiXiFS:tRiCFTFiiiXRkiiiiCCCCCCCCCCSSS.: ieiY Ufe•••fef•e~••Y••!Y•••••ff•eY•YYf •fY•Y•Y•u •eY• oaalaaaaalaaaaaa a11a1a1raaa1aaa1a1a1111aaa11aaaaaaa V s • o Je • • • •• • • •• ••f Z WW NW Y V O O ~ lJ M NN i Z N { O ~ NM a MS ~i f a` ~ w aNi.ii O ~V y i Y~ MVY N a J Y ~ WNJJP OaNfNNT J~ • N ~ Vt~ Y i W Wa re:ip:y iN S.ei: N i•i N ~N w° U W PJiNN N_y W\iWN VY >J O \M ZNY NF f NIV.IWw .Vi _O M:UMe N ~OJwV Jw~M• J OJ• ,N NWN • MAO{•~ N WWUm•y i M1 eWYt ^i'J a~ Y ~C YW Y l~O~• OV JJJw NejV iN1O ..: wnYNf iM UNO WYYZi WiMV•••\ 90 ~A pJW\90 WM1 NNN> >f ^O~ SO=YiJOiMWM N WYP\VnJNa OiVpn VVJFWFra V Y r .n N N> > a i= M1YJ NOYfi VJi JW~Nf~MO= l• Y >YMY NjON9i U OVWWYW•tW nOOY YO~;W U6 WO iif M{J iWV YV YNMMM1UYV_9N .[ M1 VNry i .fi iOWL OUw Y. i O yWi yiLl M1_V NM1_iw NW>Vt>N>piY p ii fJ0» a V W OS ..z y N yO.i. ifVifOZf NNi Y iiu•JN .Jf iiaNiO • J6 Ji=NNWJ{AOwOY~f Of VNtpOOF ~pJ J~YWZU~{V iY \VZFpW UOf..OM» iN~Ne `f YZ ON O V>N..> Jry WUIL;N OaNlNfYW wNNMMWj •fiupwVYiNpO :Ow{NPfO0YNi0 2000.. Z Ito W YJi9OY> V > o'er iOpW•>if V2\f OM10i0000ryiiNiAaryZyU00OUOJ N M170pJ O>aeMN~iM1~J Ili OOJJW W•MyM ..M Ja NNw~JjOfw~wWpNWV>rw>W~OO~iW~OWT~~WN~WMWJNWfWW~~f7iV OiNJ..06Zi6YMpO0aNppVNO YNY\NRMaO Y..IV JiY V..O iY » »NWr N > _ V_w a N JFI .i O a NNM ~ r ~ NO 00 OMi O .!i ~ si s~F ai oco ItW .i~li .i. i JVJ w„„ w Y rN Y IW.~F Va~V iV N >Y= SY1. 1MV •i NJwON~ i { V> ~~ N O.. LN W?: i Jiii NreWifa Ni N w SUWY wlJ i Y UJ Y i{rY Z.. °o~ aaJ>. 3.se :.Wf"s.es= eO wiwW .~s~stre ~`>iWWW>{JM{ f MtlNiW WN .Ji V _.ry{if. { iuwaV ItO JWrNrN NwYii~Yr .YOai yN V JOiNGWw_JVObff Oi YWb OJi NO aY` JNp IL W O .NiOi>~i iYM : ryVL iN0\.JiaO ~i0 W fWryNaOiif wf 00 OON N~JUN ON OiWa `WW V OiVNWILiW J iJy~ Vi0 :iiW{NMWry OY NiiiyiN OYiOi 4..F>WF >Y• >n>~J W•~~ {{J JNY~V JI.FFFf Y YIe00YOp~JOeJJJlNnZY{>ryMwO JiY{UVVJ{N> Wi1.{{WMNNOLW OOOOOOOOOVVVYVUVVVVVUYVVYUVUVVVVUVVOOOOpO0000YVWYWW M OI.1>OOr.NnaNNa>Y000.1>.TOOIN ONOMNNNVa1NpryO Mf. 111M a11N I.I PIOa N rl.waNryryryNryOryNONwa1NI.A4>NOa ni.l000MOiN>_nPOONaNNNNANa •naNlNalaala •IIIN Va aN NNONI yNN1 a~MJM~Nwww+MN W yweeno eeeopeNenowpfereNwoooeNSeweoNw«e«ree+pel+oeJo weepwe eonpwNwopN eHaeNeewrewnswoneoeoeweonneoON nwNOnONNNONVwO+NNnwONOnNNwNnOONnnnwa w!{Y~f ~GPPOOeN ynnJnVnlNewONa~~1y~~ly rlhN Ohnn1000y+NrOONw+O.ON y N NnyOny ww rN hOnlM wwn r N N N n N N N N N w iNP ~~m Vw0 €~ iW0 Z WSW Or0. O~ Z• Z• ~O• •Y~ •V~ •O• •W• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i• :_• i X01 10~ •i/ WWII 1>/ e :,NawNwewNnfnrwlwernn+nrwwwowNnsnrwwwewNnlNrwYPer~Nn+N sa:as.asatssattsasssasaaasssssssssesasasesssoss ssas pVffVlVftff111fVV11ifIV111111Mt1+Ilff~f111r+1ff~1111 Z _ _ _ __ _ _ U h e ! O O W UN OP ^ • n OJ V NM a N N O J _ N n W < 'Ji 1•j t0 ItiON ~ ~ O r ! iV IN~~ /~ 1 ! O:P iNj•Iw .ii • ~ ~ wn W p y e w N< 00 OW O 1 y O n Y )fN w>WJWw~ N nZF O W P N M:N w N•N O OOZ ry Y• •! w~ J O SN. ONMVi00 nZN Di _ MO ~ Z N • Pif VW OOW W F NO W Z 1 Z w0 yNA •ZV y O y FO h OjW7M6f V O W@ Z VWZZN WS ~V fW V N OMZ JN! NYYiO Z1(OON WO V J J i ii :Z NJ i INI I NWMMMZ ZnW wMPJN 4WN>WZI OnM1JZNT Wyk ~WOJrWyu WM1`fWIt<OW W4~Af V yWVI =nw WW• •NMf ZW+ JVSJ W_Oin tF rOnsO~OJYIw~I fOIi~JJHVJN~~p JJWW• z NUM wJPWf O/N•wrO~V•O n lGrNiw i __.. V ZWwiir_•Zth~iY• ~~\\fIN YN JO OVONWJ •• W T•NrNNi000 OOf NNOONWZNOiZNN Uie ~f NpfN ~NfNVPW>YIf NMNHOWOiZNi MNUMNWWOWWOYW\YIpIWW~<IALN O M1JV•wWJJNi~.eiw V_JJJiJtVZJNi`NZ fJ~f JtZf wt •>SWYSiZNOYJ NUS PZNV JAI VVV VWO2VVYf<OWV ViZJMiMMi~OhiiO YNIFy ~J=OVf•< pV JS+ZOiUZYWw O•<JZOVZNhiiYJ2>OJNFNNNrO •Ji7NWl40N0 02~OJwpNtZ~OfilWNLLONpZZZOZ •Vif+piiJi00 MIW VYa}WwUwwyWiWMWUUUiiONW<YN>~WWYwWf~Of rOt•>VWN~JVOWw lM1OZ>NOwZ O>6wY•wZY)Y)Y~OVwyOf>fO>fiZ if ~eJjpJOtiiVOY iY O w° \z N u J : y<yi `I w o f2 ~ ~ f> J Y N i N N' 1W O NZ ~ N < J M ~iJ O W W i or c 5 ipp s ~ ~$ ri i J i Z NV 1N V WN O U PO J •iY_ >UO• ~M •>S O V YZN NW O~NM N J NV \ wNw <_JWV__ Oi+ • tWN 1. Y iOYV • Va~yW J 1J. MN rF Fi VVWV v1 JJSZZWWZ yyN •N pyyJ~JppN pt O~w~v Z AMY •Nf <wV LLYpO S <~iMiiZV YOOOVN~~~~Oi • OV Oaf YY00Ni2 •'W W 1 JNWW>O`>OVNO O OiNWM•nO WMO O>CM •W p0 F• J Y00 'W O MMZY yN~ N•:PwipOiJ\p>N WIY Z WSiN Y O J f`W SWj=w>YO~wV OW NWSY>FWiYO• •Y• N~~ F ~ O<zWWi03 O n\ZiNtOWJN •O <N ii'J ii• J OWS OON .WZO iOjO_ >\W N •JWOWW NLLWUONJILLMOiJ NO i2yNM WAY O •vpW NeYiJ YI YYWOJwF~ IL Mf JNJJJw WnO tfNNWZNJJiNU\4 N MNWWyfO{ fOOWNOOiiOS•N « WWWYOOPOOVYiYf MOffWWWNii00fWWWM-NOOj VO ZY\PaWWWWUVYY2LZiZiiiZSiMNNN 1~17WYifwwl/V IfJJJJJJJJJJJ TNT/ri~T nllwljlplnwnhOwwwn•<IOJP~ljwhe~~NwONFO10wAwMYrlnl~ 'I NjjwjijjHHjnAwnNnNTwnwynM1l lrl nOfnN nwwwNrOn OTNwNNN+nn 7 wi +N>ooPOaegnmfheeeeee+\Neee+oewneownaeeawnoeNNreaNln ir: remeooNpemnNeNeenee+.~eNeoo+eewwovNwv+oerneenN•.moanw •i• »„»i.iunr»iil:ceei»Ni~.:w eni»»»rea a~oul-o o.•. i.n oni~ie ii m 1Nrmno+NmrOmm olappyNF NwNNa++eeNNrmfnNe ~.°.: 1• • N ••N NJY nNe.• m NNOO nwPN °\•/~ n rmm NN nm N w•i• N :Nw i AI u\se °f•. SZ V •• pjG u LL D• x• i1 r• fsi i i • •i 1• •O JOFYPpMMq+N+FYP°wNm1N•pNfwONMn+N+FYweNNn+gYMawOMNnINa ~sasaaasssasaaasssssssssssaassssssassssssssssaaasasa e::::::::.:::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: \r u / • \ • < W i ei u is a Jr ufn e ° • N wn~ F W N Oi•I °m N i i s :i N • J+ Pf Ni +Nh N^ N iiN ~ heA ON W N =•O i w FO Oew N~ J >' hi 1r h!~ ~Y~ •O O NO+ • ~•1 q i f_ +: O Y h•M1i _1• N_ _ Y. • F F •Y •W N N • IIY ~ V•O •Y i V h h> M • •OIL N Y i i Y i • O A •i w uU Oi • iOWh NhU Y . Ji VWhW FJp VF MVWFN ej fVM <V • Y V y Nh IWf•i JJV 1WJ_V JWJY! M WWi °[J Z •w.•[p •Mn r Oe W Wh. eN l•O rO NON NtWV• W\YO~~Vi\NWVyWLSV DYN + tYN ^Nlu• ~O=WW ^'.1~7 i° NI1iNN ii pVMiOV W mJ• m W1~ •O•f\ ILM \ff ••ill\VN°•MOWWO°YN°N<\WWJ• JrfO° Y •FW J °W NZ OMO+•Wi W[hN iY ieWfmx • ° WY MMWp N Ni r [yVVN \ \NWye S9Nii » MYi• V •pi aw[ e WNn>~W WU r : [re\WWauNNaNW~wWr. oNOz Y_ V W Y<i iwlh iW _\ SU•J_Y••OV D V NOiVUUiiFi'ZYiwY` OZiOJiG iU[iPiiwh J~>1WN •O= r Y+i iNW \OtY WrOON~~ W N hWNY`F WJ ei WMSW YFJy O_w°_D_OUW i\p(OF pf if J hWJJ60NJ JJ Jf J{JNWJVQ fpVO = ~ WFNNGS S•••LLZ NVS<VWSNVZN•yfVVy e¢•N OV uri~~ iNJWLLiWYitMY OteWN7NPD°NODfNNN NI N J: rLLWi J•+<O `XZL~yWVyW••YiSNW•SZ•WirSJ SV+•nYY>J W\WWWM<6W DfW+•WYSi Wf WWWWW>OWW>OfW<JDYyus [V>tii666iiee0YVnZYOWOO Jfp°W<>i0°>J°pVf>NNV•G60S0 U 'I N Z y \ i Y N S + i M v s o•Wi N s e» x i ZD V O JN U VY > N s o J r a i ~ +'er r e:iW iF N wo i m p rV\ ix y i y O V K i fu LIV JfNwN~ D C :iv. N E O N ae0 Nx WJ>MiWO WW •OWOY i O •N ~ is iu - yr iD ><s \r~urz ez<i~\r N o • s `~uN LL[f fN NNS w O J ~W }u W@.>DNe rN W [NNNYru r s ~~ N 2 N•{ i•vl JV VV r>N y i f Q J YO t::f •{N :NyVSMi VWWOZ>. ryJNV .OVp~pNOV fJJV Wyi/WN • % ~iM)ZZ~WZVU9J NSZ+ wO~ZNCfY \Yi~r•WeVyS~a~ RJR MNi°J • • OZ + W t'IrWN9NP10;>MOb+J jf LLF MLLNO fh fs :y Jp I [rNJ• .. i hNNxf y i ON .'fJWOi iru\•14 =xJf• • ~ Y~~N6JWW lyW WO xiNJJa [O V LLO Dr> N rVNJ .N<MiNN• \• :NW .W10 Y>J[~Yrx WJ • I JV _•Yfii •f/MJW N OOf t•~EE> M [NINZWi_•N•\W ppi lyWppNp pJp Wfs}W • % yWfui NIrF OLYitW ~4f~rMii•~iWNWW\JN)~t~M i°ii2MYf •IY ~CW t[I PrOi6f VrNF ~>VY7iNyyNirW002•>NWMiW•WrWW\YYYYFrM•••••• •i~ JJJJJii<i[<i6i![[[t[lfiii[ i Oe000•L~~~i•~~~ i i • NOI•°OOnfNmNNO00NrPWNNPPOnrNN+YNNgnN++NOeNNINnrn+Nwn •O• nr+000PPPNNNNPNrVlwel wn0\Of101000NNOOfNmmnwNNmnww+n •O• +n+On+>n>NN~.IN M1FN+hMrO^TOnrNmMM„rr+NtlrO+NN ^YNrY01wA0 ;W' NNN mm nnN nm mNmwn mn mmNMN NN <N :>. g E V• O•i• ~ P • OOO mOONOwfOwOnenfwwm•Oa00MNNf0000•Mnf yf OwNnOObNOVNNm ••`• O N^INN NC M1IOIOTy a•1N 1•i0>MpNA00y p,NafO OOOwOa000aOwO0a YNiOM1F hnOOPYwmNPOPNp e:M w OnNMO P wvNyiw~N•11nwM1NPGO•NPnn iii • v w a M mNw maaSf yNa w w P m n m w afi si ~~; uhfwewnm•n ahfls we mlNahf wowNmawanfweyNm•NahfwewNnf Na> • iswab'E'E$S~^DelS$S''iwwwio~wwwwwwwy:www wwwwwwiwwwwwwwwwwi.ww iii ~t1•••1••i•1•11•1•• '.1'w.'Y.ml.^1^w ^w .^. ^,^.^ • • y • •V11•IIIVIVaVww•a•VVV•w1YV•••w•V• • • = S f y efa • V 4\ yi O_ a M1f • yy Y Z • NS ~1 D a lW • V i V7 lZ • \f O f • 00 _f W ~ yJ \f 1• •O w V • Oy N Z t Y VM S N ~ l ! V ZNP • a1•iehi D ^ F FN ZJ lpD~ 1 h Nw M1 V VS ~ fmO ply mfw • yl O Vf i0 a e D i• h ~ w o W yy I J VSI • • >u>O mNp\ N PO h Sf X~T ay w IOJP O O SSw • YWl V'Y w iir• f W V• hwM~ r•NWNOM MNZ O '1 • Va V Ny~r•Jmf __ I _ _ pl YyYYwF iN Vw Sy> J _f I.JZ S JN NvW lee •Y• O WZh fZ.Pri w111}IM SVfMh Ont N fIF NfO •h1 Nl fwZMJ F Wil ~f ywZ• fl?\MN •~OV O =Vfl hfZZJyI^.^ _ ! ^~ ONl FSZO__lF DNO\ hol~ WMNfY J V» >WNQOJOIJ l• yJh~ZNh N•W NZaOAmOZ t2VaSJ O •I• iF Fr• p NZV N>OfpfNaO• JJ=pWby JO OfNfJ9VVfV wV>_L •J ZpajMy •M .yJO~ •~NfhNDW>O ~PfWI WNNwWfi 6VOpYWNryf ^OiV• fYJ •6Mi0agOJwIN FfW• V • O O„Oif• JyJNi JNILC„ O!1 1 VINO~py^IW V p>Vf Y•[VVi`fWD~oVS pJpM^V iW: SOif VM1J S •J ly fO1JO JiNNFSJf phFy. _pJ _ • Sl4NNNJN>NUNI~fN=HNi4NidjNLLNMlaWW f OwOOW M1linwF e\fW~lpf Nf eWiueHa iDSY2e ~NUamnN~^~ ~°' v; IOOSY2NOf0 p ryOWOf JWNNfNLLIII Z ZfOff YlryOytOfWWDWWWWy•mW0 f•>N VVSWaf>SZaO •f N9VYNO0IS • M L! f • w Fy j I W W V M • ~ F Jty • ~ ~ ~ fiD M1 W • • •~ M 1p ZWV p i p H N g~ f Dh2 N Y Ne J h.~ NZZ _ iF a Qa¢ N _ ~ p NUg O • ~ VFpw yMhO • n F v w •D yWW n Niylyy~Wh ~>a~ti~ •fuWl°u oo~kat > Wsh p i ~~ W iuf. fi Wu~efDl iiW }"WZi:f ah • •iF. gcNSOiJMf :D b'u':feivWephha DF fWNN aN•l~'a:fM1 iW M1 ~J.f.a $$N No N ofW ~ OtNYNFZWZW •hl faf 6NWVV jV yVJOFNWfV~tif • lfbOF•~f VZ~WOWNeDI:N bZtYW •U9DY~ INSF>tW Y• yf ~OV y IW• YDF S„ZOWySJBa J2• 00 N•O• ^Of ~ f> fIW 90W •f• NMpNfVwY22S2CUpVyIIY>Olf SSO yI •>jY2tj2~,uyM~H~iJf NY1• •i• llll~Vffl.Sf if of tf tZfVZN P L :.....N..Deed:~:~e": :f• NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN O: mNaAOMypyMM1lmN a•1M1 mNawONNI NI•.OP NNNNNNhh • NONOawNNO400f NITOOeON NYNI~l hIVHOaN •W• awNwfNNwNmNwMwOaNmaMma NOwaaw aOYN aNM1a1N^aaNmPhmwwa'•wJwMfm i>: 9a aaws~r•iN°aS °awaf•mm ay E a«S.N. a.wi° l iN ~:0 V!G pew V •• ~O LL •~ ft l• f. i0_ :f :i i i i •l •h ~M •V •i OOOPO~ONphOPONNnahONwOw1 Y1P0 N O o+00pw+MnPNNONwNwnMi PNONNNNw~^Ntl wpeNONN+000 y <O+~ ~ 1N.JNn wn wwwNwn N wn JOPOwNnaN+hOIO NaNONE}OwN fnnaaaaaaaaaaNwhNNNNNNNOap wwmwwewsawawwaiwwwnwwww >o ~iaaarrwa+a+ra++aaaa++eaa •.`n ` a fef + ~i . N N W N wi z Wi i eu uu ii iii ` ~i ` ~ ~ wl i Wh i fN Nco `e ~ h 9£ =R~ mOt wo pwOhhw >w• FN = wPp `u°N toaa zF~uJ siw~~ W hhF• ~W O liNhwJ •iii_ VNiZfi i JOO ~~ •O Ira •MJNO VOJff ~f >wwJOWfWN~f>9Z<OW)O NVi+ OIV OMZ WJII •pNW~ JO hOVVh~+ 4>%OhlfOV •OwY YOJw fWNZOpOJWhM~`h =Ja JVpOw2 Of •VJhOf >~26iWhh~ Wiww00>FZ> ~~whOiP »~wf R41M Wf W0>MWN ppVVhf U>NSOi60l ZIwYSVYOLL Nf N S O N V >V FZ N i< ONr Ouy y V_ S NVf >S Vir J yN{wil JYh>IRRSs xi NSW~Ww VON tOwp~YUiOnJY> NJOO• •N++N )1N iJ •VVJMif OV i>US> 'i •FN »VS %VT ~rt ~OSOiw fON %NN iiYO>S~l N iJ Oif %tl WWOWhWiWWWNWN• J>iO+iWV)NJ ifhOMJOjOii )iOWitfMiNJiOf%JYIJOf) f WiMOOiY9iR++f+WLYOOwOWw` Fhhhh>F>Y» ))iliilli i>NN+ ~YII 10• •O• •W• •>• I 11 FrnwwN~hiYN1NrNNwNPO>00NMrw 0l w0nNNaNN+NNrNN000NNryI1N /~ ...~ _ m... .... a..,m_ .. Y, ~~° ~ t RC' 3 I _ F Yc§e ~_ m gs~` i ~ _ ., .. __ F _ E. f S:. o[ - _ - zo: :. Y ., .: €:. x 4 - ~ Y eg:3 _.1 a :z Y . .x 1 ~ f J E e Y ° : P - i _ . . . . ° s e .. .. ~i ~ ... .. .... . .. .. i ° y' _ ~ . s k ~. _ ~ r \ i9 - P ~~. y__ ~~~ Y =g ., _ _ 6Y88^e _ _ ~_~°FS ^^R ,..maJ:s~zo"mss=~S~°a $szosscu e. °s S~~'c e.ma.. ,._. „n F;<:~-,r ~.n seas€aa$~s-fir: ,,,,.,..~._a,,. .. mmmo s~x vRRSrc z.a mese _ ~.F. eRRR R" ~t:E ~~ ¢:b"6e=.j-'~G:,°. ~k :49k` pR~RR~"r, .. _ ~F.'a5~'aF,::&R3RA38,2 ~'"',&~O1~RT..84RR~ e 4eC'~ s.. - ~' ~~ y~ psi 'e r.n sx.a~~xxce~a•~mz r> r ~. -P--rs~r.___es: ee ~~a.•~asasu°us~- ... ~ ~ Wfiz`~$S€R,Sf+m'_R $'a P'<.%z'a Ra~~Fo$s° ns ....-.mmma m mmmmA-^s~.° £'r €. ~s%F e' ~, j'~.~b a^] eC SR R'e&~~^~& Fv v`.R$3~RDR RPR R S P'B'S&l:^S&& sss ~ - ,' 's N ~,~ _., u z ~:-n~~{~nvsw _e .~'s :::.n~ Y Y s - ~.°SP F'er~£.'P a /P ..~f_ g _ m f ~. .... ~ _ .. ___ F _ R' S,' Gff'.'. S :3 :: e .. ., ,., ... $ m a :~£ k. ... .. ~ 'm4 _ _ yk '. _ Sty&~ _ £ €, ~ ° - m 5 _ ". _... _ .. _ ..~ ., ._ Y o~ • a o v ~°~ - _ ~FS ir ° .. _. F. ii ~ , G ., ';~ 'g"~ ~~V SN M Wn ~a4 F 5e ~LY:~`'y ~d :Y, ~Sx. ezs as ~'~ ~F. ' ~ Y ~ S ' a ~' ~ ~ a ^ a ~ a ~ a 9 ~ Y4 yn 7.z ... .t°.~ ~a^.e 9F ~,F .~i$ ~R i /~ x ,~ > ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~, ~ S i S_ v. E .~ w IIs . ~. .Y _ y m vg .. a: .. ..; m.. .. ,., Yeo:.::R e .so ',fa S.: ' Y .Y' i _ £': Gb 3 Y: .,. R .8 ... .. M .. k - ~F' _ F& z a ••6 &gS `. SC' ii€ a . .. ..... ..... o.a w.. e. e, .... m :.Ta nk _ - .. .., ~... :.fie:: Y.vY Y'Y „'.~.4 SN R a ~ Y Y: 4 l z ~- 15 an ~F ', ao'.. :. f'., q.~::, n Yt Y ~1 e, ' S_I: ~ Fy Sy#' s Y YC; ~~ ,_. ~y- Lu ~° ~, °.n* q ~~r~ ~ ~~ ~; i v. A...% .-i. # £ y r _ r, s nr-~e ~ ~ ~ „d.. y :R Y F ' # w R 7 a >_ 0 0 a .~ '!i . `4 rmras rrrw ~ 1. RruA d ru No Iw o.F.... / p.It' ~.I..~. CMd I[Qn NR ~~r.ra.wr... r....Mr unw: n~cs cone /b Iw4'iEUII AwobE wwa Ow ls.Irlvlbl w YioY IwJ x. wAAIEIA d AMIIUJIfryI ibq. I.r Ag1A ord. sw. awu ^ .AM.'ao sliAl .... wl.elb ows l..a.pe. Vhaliw ow.: Oip. TmOebAOflA, F z TRryll d rpANSACiwN151 EEE llf. vAECe.r. sAYAwik n ,Tle ~v T.s...eW.. . ! [a1GOOA TAeYACbv. DO pw , _,__ ~ ~_ ~: ~, l N.dEAn~ ..~. ~, ....Q. !. lapEw d fYMwrNwiw arr!lMw1 95Y1 Ewf1113 )lb. G ud T7 Ceb carn+Y ! Y~DD 1)]0 TOTAI P n AwNb IYwI. ). An Erlmixr MIiM i~ lbw Tyw d Vur. -- Cih IirMrl E. A1vL1 Adbow (II dlllrwl hM !)~1wE4w and SAM n..Il fMl v. Ilm yaa «.. bbn aonwrwd a a I.b,I) la. na.. raa ~.o..ppr.e aar a Xv Pro•MwII a Xro AiMeOr N U e....w. comma M w nadaYae a M. rwpwp.m pw. p~aM'pp Nn AaR r(rJ. 11. Ewlurr • "YFl` mww p ihTr 9 w 10 arl an cwxlwmr'rd~aA Jrdl b dllrwd port a Mir appEaoXan. It. AITRmrr .r... Isl Ilu e.T ^vnplr w+IAoYOd w ernrdo EaInW pnmivr •nll hm all :tn awSfKaronr a(o kawx, and Ibl Mw b .iE IrII rialoio w rarrl w pwbM b M rNlep, pry d Np pprilpw d !p Alaabla M.wvw fobla M. 11. liAR p CAVO~M CwME d.__ Al~W10 '~' ~ •i. ' -: ~'J ............................Oeb.______ _.____ .______. ... rr J ..1... r . w~ +~+ ~. __.. wr ~ wMr +u r~r ~w~ Yr ..Mr Ir..r. ~w+snnr ~ u.x r: M ~ ' r~ ' ~~ A..+ Orr J xn .wr. nwr.. ~ w ... ~ rtY ~~ Y rY wiM_Y, ~'r Mw.~ ~~M ..w. Mr M .M M. n.J. rV ~~I~ ~~ r~ti Y r~ir.r..r.. wp ~+rr+u+Y M w.M.'~ ~....-...,.r ... -.n w r ~ r.un.n . wJw u . r err J rvn.r.~ ~ , ~ :rF. ~ ~ ~rM b YI ~I~ 4.ww r .. rr mr« .:i. w.r n .r. nw~ ~w r mwr.y r..wNr w ~~. r.. , SCAI 19E~.L._________ .__...._..._..v ____________________________._.....__ ._......-___.__.._.~ __. ..________._.llcJEtl0.~1J1p________... ______________________________________________________________ uruc~teoa ~r FR~avato~ i!. STAR d CAIM)M.A fwbl! d_____________________________ ________ Wb__......_________......_____ ~r Y A. tirlrwl •Y.r.. wII~+~ M _ w M .ti. w~rr .r w r..w. r...nln..r•.s~w Y V rwv I+~14 Y~Y W ~ Y +M+ ~ 4 wY+l N. myYn~ .rMN wr :4 .rw/ Mrs J Y~ rY ~ ~~~ F ~M rr Y Itir~, rY M M ~~ti 11Ywr . new ~~Mr u r rY r, nyh rl+ ~u J , hr n~ 9w•~ ~r1 ih ~ ~ +4r ~ ICY W M ~ ~W ti +.I~ nYtixn Y M Arwr~n~ ~ w Mw~ w ~ ti y "~r+ I ~~~ ~ w MM ~ +In. ~ ~M.~ J ~xrn~, :rl M M xwrM wMVwh ~r M ~rM~~. F r'.M p ~.M ~ Y r..~~ .M ~ rM'H Yalr rr t arMrl A Nw 1-r!M Mlwo FYI EMI Fw MAwMw Vw OYp AOwbM ^ EwwW IrNrr, / O M`!'E ~rA B/T/sY ^ .____..___...___._________________...__._cones Aunro....._._._._.__._______.._...__.__...__ :~, rl wlr.d:Md.__......lMdw ...................__._.__..OF~w an.___._..__._.._ IIw.Ip W. RANCHO Ti1AI B.B.Q. 9581 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N APN,4. 206-261-52 Presently located in the Foothill Specific Plan, P}arming Sub-area s, Commercial/Utfire Zoning of adjacent properties I: w a :~ T u S FOCTII IyL, BLVD' ~ North: Foothill Sub-area Specific planning 3- Soecial Commercial South: Low residential 'zone East: Foothill Specific planning ___ Sub-area 3-Soecial Commercial 41est: Foothill Specific planning Sub-area 3- Commercial Gff ice 958@. 9586 9Cil}7 9589 960.1 9fillS 911119 '1611 9615 9615 961'1 7621 9625 IlAIICIIU 'II ItItACI' II IIIIR /8 10-B-90 S, Ram'rez Id a 0 ~I l6 C .~ ~y aElrrErrr.Ipdr • __.___ _..-..____ _. _. _..z a.r a5a. dw ErErwr.rrprar. a.` aMaKAMI ~~ ~NM aO~A 1. iNM) w V~YIN ti M0. it Cgr~r d AlwlaaE YE{wr faNd trot ap.wpl. n.Npsr sra.r. VI. vSata ie..........1 ar aara aaa a ~ aae5au n+as ^tfyl Nq, x caa 5a~~~~haE.E~~ ors I.E.a ]. anaaNA a NIUGMpI Twt ISnul aOfi1NON, .lam / aNECt MaNYa p~aEE S.c SavM ~ drew Orp t~~Yat VIMIn OMn 1, T1vNla) EM 15( ~ lC ITR Ac.Y. N 15i.:a i _~ 4 Eplw M L:Elnp x kaWr d Fplr~Nupar eva Lr tsu 4saallaa cry rM q t.l.woc» Qa~t~1w Cww1aT01 W M[ur~lEp TOT~I N iSV.N 3ae4 TTw Yf liarlw as-115/13 r. lw nrnw. m.a. CiN l:nalET 1M N. MoW9 Adds fa fllpwl Ovp $14wbw a.i 14w1 rr.~l n..l bMat v, t1v.Y tTM ~... bwn wnEiCEa d a IwwY1 to. Ilan 1a Y.w Neblwl wry d M pw'dep d 1M :lkahaYE Nwwaw CarrM M r nVEiEar~ d ap DEperNwnE rEr 11, Eyls1 O "T8" rlpr p -Ip 9 M 10 s a a11~MN .FIEF EFaN a awpEa psl w ap ^vvNEaNan, tI. Apdkpv apwl (el apt rq rwpE wvlwYO n wEE4 Nrr.d rEpEw .ill Am. oN aN aYUvNErrE w a NEEnEEE, pN ro) Nv M wla r ElEler r r:EE a w.pk b M NdrE1 unY YI ap wYNYE.E d ap .Slpl~wk NE.rew Capai An u. sT:ETS a wNOldaa _ crpp d ____111a1t4a.___________ o.p a/tU9o N V ^:R.~ 1~r. ~ti. M ~..Y~w ..E. ~...Er~~ 'n Y41. Ma.w~ n/ w., M ,wE.N~ ~ .wl ~ p/ .I. W M E. xrAwA A ~ p ~ ~ w.. ,4 u r.p;~ r pr . r pw~... _ ~w. w w :'„~`,,; h~ ~.re:.... r. wr..W.4.. ..+w ..~~.~~.I~...Iw~:...-.~- Y~.nE.~i. v ~ r ~~ Y.Yr ~Eaplp n Y,1 M :In M1M,~w .. ~ . nW4. r4~ w . M wr ,NY N ~w:lnr . +Yn. n .Er I wrw: IA p •sN. wlls~ .r F ~M/". F wFr M w4/ r A. I:,r .M w :...F.. iJ.Y:r . 1 prr... r 11, .51111CAEIT N~ •Fruunoa ~r nuua(ew Ix sun a C.Sd/WHP caYnEp d--u_...ae. ..a...--~~-'-0-n0--------"-'-- UW A.11 N rY~. W E.~ Nom. YY ~y~... Y.. µs:Nw ~ .n III :4 M,w~.... ...Mn NM N Or .....4 "~ '~E~yp tiYME wNV .r..~ M ..... wrEw w"n 4YI::11 :Iw 4 ~ ~ :Mw -.N...:. w .n.w X. 4~r E~IY ~i• Yp. V 4 EN. ~ w 4 w.M.n ti. I~En W:N +w, :.M N 4n wM.W, Na E ~ w1. Y 9E:~wE F :p Ey~~ r Y.. p ~.np 4N4+t .~. ~ ~~. n :w :./. a .+W h ~r'M N ~ Y~..r s up Yw~E ~nE :w ~~ V ~ rn .~E v E4 ..IUP ~` W .M M Eww4p+ r n-~-•, 1~p .N.~u. Mr.~A N::w..4 pE~E. y:n ~mr.Nw.A.. :.rb yWw.. ~. T~.Y wwM1 WEw YEp.p~~ aw awp.r~l.n a NN WEfq Mb TA4 LGwl Fw MFwIwnY Vw Vd1 :NssM1, ~ Mewlvl EEaEV. ^ 11aEElv1 ws*E. .__..____~_________L__ ___________.._______Cdllf AUtt[D .__. _.__.____..__J_ ~_.___.\_.__.__.__ Above Board Deli Romona Ist Federal :[ J W KK U Bigts Boy J, L9 th I~ ,) ABOVE BOARD DELS AVNA 202-54I-56 E614 Carnelian Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 n roVerty air renLly zoned: Ne iyhSo rhood Conaterc ial [miimf i ~ "dja Lf^! v."C:~nriy• North: Frwy, 8 Low I2esiJenlial South: Neiyhbo rhood Conmerc ial East: fleiyhborhood Countercial Wes L: Low Residential 10-8-90 S. Ramirez d~ P ~~ T .t R a >r 0 0 d m ~~ .~ 'i 0 I - 1 1 ~ :_:::.:..:" ~F:. I _~ ~.-• •rrrAr~. were. fw ~CCIO! ~eA ii~pWl ). n'tE'lsl q rKBaftPl Iltf Iq. _. ` 7r u'vwr.a J Atoilk ewwlr CMa1 It01 Ire•Arr•1' S v' RCENt !O. mwti. CdE. pSSIE ••~•Y A~ TM M e1•'••'w•'r•, ptf-Sal. E••r f VSw T7Pe 20 COQ - u rpny AwMr eP•e4 Ew fw.ruvd•eriWsbb.n ~ w bW :. HAwEfs) a AERICAnIfS) 7.wP. twwM sr1 c.r ~r•rlov A..E•d wdw Sw. 1•p4 ^ les•w Dule. n. tnKrin pen; ]. 7Ytry5) Ot TMNSACIIOfyS) ~ EK. tttE Ortgiv•1 S -- .. Newr d Miiwr s. lwelien d Enhmw~luwMr wM srw BFIS E• li d - •• v Ro• Gry wd nP cad. ~•nn role s _ she.. irP• d t w r •. ~v. nrm~wr lows e/~ 2p-22>pst Sna a City l~wini s. Mduno Aear.w rr sn.wnt he.r »~rwb.. wd sw.w • rr..r. r...l 9. Ilor• yw •wr b•.n renKtnl 9] i pi- n f'I'^Yf Ip. How you rrw riebM arty d Mr wvririwn d rM Ak~ehNw Sw•roE• CaMW M w rMletlarn d •w p'G•rrnr'nt Mn va roinnE ro M. Anti ~ 11. E~Idn a "YES" wear ro irwx 9 w Ip an an wtwhewn •hwh M•11 r drrnrN twr d MI. opPlk••m. tf. APeIv-wn epr•w (e1 Mw wry rwrwp•r weplyM ~• m+olr n~M w-n:w+ will harr aM M• prrolfiwria• of a Lu~w, aM (bf rhet M wAl mr .lobo w [eun w P'r•M b r wdar•e mr el Nw tmm d Mr Almhdn r..ropr Cwmd AN. ^. SrAIF Oi WnOEHIA Caemy d.__3a~n.Bar:Lasn ............. fww_____9l15.(96. ______., u.•r "nwr • r.n ~'r~• •n•. "_n nw'••+~ ~ ~.w" s~ 4M r~+w~r wr~w.... w+~ «~wrnw •u .a.yn.~ .nx.en r w~ r. ~ •n +" 4..~.~ ti. M~ ~ yew Ir ar .nr ~ ti wr"siy.~ ~ w'rv ~~ ^Mn r~ .".er h ~.li ~~ ~•w~ wY'•w a/4rw www ~ w x.Jr h r • I.N4 r A M Mnrw "w'n+.n ~ .N.M w 11. ~, ~.` AMIICATION ~r TfUNf~IRO! Is. s7s7c.a aut4/Q~ cowry d___'__."-____--.- pnn...___.....°-------"--- :" M Iw"rvnl MYnM xa.~ u.n Xn +rlk"nr W ny.,M ~n e .r/nsr~ n :w ww. ~. r w..r., ~v~r..`.. r~ w..., ., .~...w .. Mena y ~ M aen .I nvnlw~ "r w •MaI ~ i~ r ~r.Mn "r ~rMn. M •v..M ~wYwM .elan w •~ ixwxn .w..~ ~+'~w'%ewr s w wr~~~ a / M M"n ~r nir. M1 ~~ ..~ f~ bn•.alr hrd__.._..._.Mdal._..._____ ................. Ollla m.__..___.....____ArwiN Na Uo Nd WrW 9•bw TW tbrl Fw 77'fwHmmH (Iw OrdY AwwMd~ ^ EwerdM iwllu. ^ HdrWrY n•nw. 9132 9p ^ .__._.._._.~__________ _ __________________COtI[3 MAelD ._~.!~T~~4'Z~~-~cCx__.._.. --~ I--i ~ } ~/ SMART & FINAL APN NZ07-Q22-24 8675 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Property currently zoned: Neighborhood Conmrercial coning of adjacent properties: North: Medium Residential, 8-14 DU'S RC South: Medium-Nigh Residential, 14-2A DU'S RC East: Dffice West: Vacant Flood Control District I ~~ i, N 10-8-9D ~a S. Ramirez .:~. --, ~rrrlr.r ~er.eRr wsrr.lRwrrrw„le~e..wrM y (6 a 0 O W m .~ ~s IM It~R ~M utaMnl 1. TIIR{q w IrsAl1Y wt NO. h oq.r I Ali#L.Mr.O C.I+rd Ittl ~~A .. Rhll[t1dR d ~ L B~ L Ml~ ~ Sme•.o. CaN./!It ...~rrar.w~w.~ F]1TBLJ PIJQ OM IYU1l CAtt 3t1S - IMe ewlw+tW MereMR enwRph Aarer AeDelr LLea Ow ~- 4Med 3. NLMNA Ot N11K.VITQ1 Try' hW pyteM adr Rs fLyR ^ RxrteM UJ1 1LMNIW ERedlw OLIR - i x il'RRILI d TRLTxtMG1I01R3) ~ ~ TTIt - [wr. bf. 3 L9. PJ R! IYtD. hutf a~.re..Tr- _ QI 11 • Nor d twer 't Otlf _ s. leaeMn d 4W~sJA~.b+aw13~w1 9170 mAa tw. 8103 CRy eni ZIR Cde cawe!' TOILI t 1'A.00 IR •pplkaer epees ;a1 Na eel' rwY~ ..dqe+ xe an~W Naased pwl+n ei Mew r'Iw. ReeMt~r^r d s Rrare, ea _(MI MM N .91 M .blew r nwe r Re1dI p My NalaM e^I d M peeiaw d IMe nkeFete nrrep Caved M. Ix sTLre a ulrotr~ cealr w ._._~,~yt._--_--__-_____o.r-.--.10LU90.._____-._ ./~ M e. Tir ~~ •. r wTh ae~tw:r. Yr ..wM a 1~. W yrn r e. Wii iT .Y 4 ti~ F 4.. .w'u~ ~/ ~~ ~ M M ti~I e.. ww~0 h.~. ~a ...~. IT t .~ awn w~ Ye+l~ Tee'. ~ Y~ti~Y ~_ .. ~ eY Ir.lx In .W ~a/Lrin ~. IN ~ ~ .T1~ aw.~l ~~ ~ wNi Y ~r el~~ rn~ 'M .~ i1F ~n nJ.e V A . r -. .eeea~ln w a.I . M1r~~ ~ ~ ~. ~ iti1M . n.M+ w i ...eti .i Mti ~'+i/~ 1 ~w O.. w. n~~ +YV4• ~r r .Yliw. A .:~ wr +/~+ i 4. ti. ~.~ ~ my WyYr Y eae~~a. ~_ 1 iL •MIIICANf SIGN 110E .-..~_....,y-__ -__.~__ -__.~ __-_ .__._--_ -._-__.___.__-_. _._____.-._.-__~. ~wuc~noRR ~Y 1!. tTAR O! UItOMM CaeRR d___.-yLyrtLy._---.__-__ __-__Mb_-_--_iOfl.~yg___--__- V.in IMF / I~F~..~ I~ Wes .Ines. Tom. W. ~~ ~~ III IY n ~ Nr.. ~ ~.~Nn M~ M M.Tr IM.... +~I L Y ~+Y+ w'~L 9e16p1~, M .in.a a ~. ~ Tewln ~ w Y.e: IA ae le rW ~.. nY~M~ V ~...~. w ~4 wW y.M4 MVI Ina. rI w M.Mr . n 4 rM wl.. ~M +.Nwl . •wn ~Mn I M ~#~f~ Ian. M ~ ear 4 +/..~ ti Y Mw~ 1A r ~_ ...e/wA~ .r nw~~ ~~Iw 4 w .ei a wM w IAA M . ~ w w ~ . w.r a.r w ... n.. +n r.. ~.+e r r....w ...~. wwae.. w -,. w ti.`.+ . • .... wr,M . e.lwn~ .. ~ I~ T aM. I w..b~ r ~ W ~ ^i. T ...lam I ~~r ICI we w wwr •eee4. ~ ~ ~rw.• b .w r aJl..~ ~ w I~w w .~..nati eYl~ F Y qA~a AnsheA 4 Rudd mhe, U NeYwI pyen. . d ------------------°--'~'~°----------_ GGfNI NARw .---- ---._iA :~1_til_---..--_ ....r. n Rllwel: r« d-........_.Md a... _-.., ..-....----_..... oMiw an,.-. _..~._..--. 6aws1 Ne .-1' _!::ia-cZ-.... 7~ Qe Na1 Md1e le4r iRM LMey Pr DryemlrlY Ur ft14 m_ -- t r CHERONY'S u aveo A:e. "lm rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 APNH 209-252-17 - Cu:^rent Zoning: Within an Industrial Park y~ in sub area 6 of the indust- rial Area Specific Plan and C) ~ with in the Haven Ave Overlay ~''------~~~~ ~ District. ~ ~71~ Zoning of adjacent property: ~I I North: Industrial Specific Plan/Haven Overlay District-Subarea 6. South: Industrial Specific Plan/Haven Overlay Uistrict-Subarea 6. East: Industrial Specific Plan/Haven Overlay U15Lr1C L-~UUarEa u. West: Industrial Specific Plan/Haven Overlay Oistrict-Subarea 6. Oct. I1, 1990 M. Burgan ~~ x m ,i,/~ 7C/, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ., DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Junior Civii Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Milliken Avenue Underpass Improvement Project, located between Sixth Street and Jersey Boulevard, to be funded from SB140 Account Number 35-4637-9030 and RDA Account No. 15-51000 RECOMMENDATION: It is recm..mended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Milliken Avenue Underpass Improvement Project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject pro,~ect plans and specifications have been completed by L.D. Vii; - :-c ...,inn by "~,vF anA an~rnvoA by the Deputy City Enolneer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is =5,500,000.00. Legal advertising 1s scheduled for November 20 and November 27, 1990, with the bid opening at 2:00 P.M. on Thursday, January 21, 1990. Respectfully submitted, ~'.l~.aePl~P SB:LRB:sd Attachment 25 RESOLUTION N0. 90 -3 g ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "MILLIKEN AVENUE UNDERPASS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Milliken Avenue Underpass Improvement Protect". BE [T FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 1s hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to w1 t: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the Ctty of Ranrhn furamnnna r., „~ ~.ev,.. cite hour or z:uu o'clock P.M. on the 17th day of January 1991,ysealed bids or proposals for the "Milliken Avenue Underpass Improvement Pro,{ect" in said City. Bids will 6e opened and publicly read imnedlately in the office of the City Clerk, 1500 Ctv1c Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal lfornta, marked, "Btd for Construction of Milliken Avenue Underpass Improvement Pro,{ect". PREVAILING MAGE: Notice 1s hereby given that 1n accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor 1s required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality ;n which the public work is performed, and not Less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. in that regard, the Director of the Depar4ment of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such yeneral prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates oP per diem wages are on file 1n the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,lob site. (p CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. MILLIKEN AVENUE UNDERPASS IMPROVEhENT PROJECT OCTOBER 17, 1990 PAGE 2 The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 471, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly tndentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under h1 m. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint agprentlceshlp committee nearest the site of the public works protect and which administers the apprenticeship program Tn that trade fora certificate of approval. The certificate will aiso fix the ratio of apprentices to ,journeymen that will be used 1n the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to flue except: A. When unemployment 1n the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee nos exceeced an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or D. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least i/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor prov!des evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds ostabllsheE for tYw; ddininisiretion of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen to any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors ort the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall campiy with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1717.6 in the employment of apprentices. C7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. MiLLIKEN AVENUE UNDERPASS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OCTOBER 17, 1990 PAGE 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of ApprenticesM p, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed to the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workmen, or mechanic 15 required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours 1n violation of said Labor Code. Contractor ayrees Lo pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount eoual to at least tan mrrnnt f1fYC1 ni •Ao , ,o,~ ni ~.u ~u . guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposedpcontract if the sameyis awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter Into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, 1f any, shall be returned to the Lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1001) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent !508) of tho contract price for said work ahaii be giver. to <_ecure t!;e payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or tabor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will aiso be required to furnish a certificate that be carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. .a CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. MILLI KEN AVENUE UNDERPASS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT OCTOBER 17, 1990 PAGE 4 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of Lhe Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of E35.00, said 535.00 1s nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request 1s accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additionai nonreimbursable payment of f15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Secttor. 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth 1n the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and excense, substitute authorized securities 1n lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla, reserves the right to reiect any and all bids. B,v order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla, th15 day of 19 yor RTTEST: y er ADYERTISE OH NOVEMDER 20, 1990 NOVEMBER 27, 1990 a9 - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 17, 1990 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Mana 9er FRDM~ Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Susan Neely, Finance Officer SUBJECT: ARTICLE 8 CLAIM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 RECDlMENDATION 1. The City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the attached Article 8 Claim. 2. The City Council authorize by minute action the distribution of Transportation Development Act Fur.ds (TDS) for fiscal year 1990(91 in the amount of x,617 ,657. RACK6ROIIND Each year it is necessary that the City Council authorize the City Manager to .:._ ... ~..,a n...:_i_ o ..i .:., c...... ~.. ,..~,....: ,.. :..• ,.c •~.., rte..,. Transportation Development Act Rinds for street and road purposes. For fiscal year 1990/91, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive a total of E817 ,657 in the Transportation Development Act Funds. Respectfully su~bm intted, Ji~ Administrative Services Director JH/SN/dah attachments ~edsle A-8 I I A Article 8a (YIIC 99dOHa) and STAF ~P"a A& 2ss1) I al SYae,t/s and Rwds Claim i tANQAL RLrYORTING FORM I City of Rancho CLCalmnga Article 8a c?nc -1 (PUC 49400a) (PUC 99313.3) I~ I I cy loan I Fsr 1441 I cy lean ~ :Y 1491 I ~.d EaL+vre 0 I i ~ ~~I j Begivvivg ci Ywr iJj 1,921.586 11.752.621 ~ I ~ ~eaues IO{PrgOVPr00PLleI ?.ilOCdl1G9S • i ,.)i I 1,:;07,105 i 817,657 ~ I i ) 1GIEfEA .)i I ~~ Refuvds!P.eimbursEmem! Audie qdj, I ajl 43 326 I I I al P.evevucs i )(Sum lives t-41 i)~ 3,321,383 2,691 076 I I ~ecanures i )local Sheets avd Fteads ci i ~ 1 368 762 12 6 i I I --T Eicycle aatl PedeAn+_n I ;.I I I I I Facilities Wot An. s) i I I al Exoevdnares I II ' I ) (Sum lives a-ii 3'r~ 1,568,762 ,2,691,078 , i d Halavice i Evd of Year I 1.752.621 I verify that the iv(nrmaUOn on this Financial P.eoartin¢ Ford is true avd accurate to a:e :er^, ci ~y kvcu9edbe. SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS TDA ARTICLE 8a CLAIM FORM CLAIMANT: PAYMENT RECIPIENT: City of RaRChO Q1Ca111DRga City of Ran~M (l lnarmno~ COUNTY LTF: (Claimant) San Bernardino P.O Fhx R07 PURPOSE: (Check one box only) (Mailing Address) (~ Article 8, PUC Section 99400a (City and Zip ode) Local Streets and Roads Susan M. Neel Y, Fi nanrn Officer ( 1 Article 8, PUC Section 99400a (Attention-Name and Title) Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Susan M. Neely ,_(714) ARQ-1 ASt (Contact Person-Phone No.) DETAIL OF REQUESTED ALLOCATION: AMOUNT i. Payment from Unallocated Funds 817,657 2. 'Payment 'from Reserves (Drawdown of funds reserved in a previous year) 3. Total Payment Requested (SUa cf I,i nes i ar~d 2) 517,657 CON DTTTON OF APPROVAi.• Anhrnval of AIITHORTZTNC CTGNATi1PF this claim and payment by the County (CLAIMANT'S CFIIF.F Auditor to this claimant are subject ADMINISTRATOR OR to monies being available, and to the FINANCIAL OFFICER) provision that such monies will be used only in accordance with the allocation instructions. (Signature) (Print dame and Title CTC USE ONLY FAYMELIT SCheduie Requested: isle pavmen4. Month iy_Otriy other -- indicate monthly payments on the following schedule 7 10 1 4 8 11 2 5 9 12 3 6 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~~~~•~~ Jerry rulwood, Deputy City Manager By: Bruce Zeiner, Chief of Police ~~' -nor<.,.,~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO BEPBND A88BT 88ZZD'R8 PONDB Recommendation The staff and the Public Safety Commission recommend the acquisition of the equipment included in this report. Such equipment will enable more effective law enforcement activities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, as of this date, has approximately $71,493 in its law enforcement asset seizure account. These funds are a result of legal proceedings against assets of narcotics offenders in our City. Health and Safety Code 11489 describes use of these funds and places only two limits on how they can be cnnnr• 1. They must be used "exclusively to support the law enforcement...efforts of those agencies." 2. The money "shall not supplant any state or local funds that would [otherwise] be made available" to the agency. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department would like to purchase the following items utilizing funds from the Asset Seizure Account. These expenditures are not supplanting any City funds that would otherwise be made available. COMlfONICATIONB 0^a (1) Oi(i, Modei isD, hand held cellular telephone. Two (2) OKI, Model 23 cellular car phones, includes car antenna mounts and installation. The total cost will not exceed $2,500. .33 Asset Seizure Expenditures October 17, 1990 Page 2 The hand held cellular telephone will be issued to the stat.ton commander. There have been many occasions where City staff or Police Department personnel have needed to speak with the station commander and Z have not had a telephone available. I have also been at crime scenes, away from my vehicle and needed to speak with my staff or the City Manager's office and have been unable to de so. This telephone will assure my being available to my staff and other City officials at all times. The two cellular car phones will be installed in the administrative lieutenant's and traffic lieutenant's vehicles for use when they are in the field and have a need to have telephone contact with City/Station staff. There are many instances where telephone communications have been needed, but these officers were not near a telephone. These instruments will allow for effective communications for personnel while in the field. COMFOTSR BOQIPMBNT Two (2) Compaq computers Two (2) Printers Two (2} Coior v.G.A. Monitors The total cost will not exceed $9,500. BOFTIIARS Two (2) WordPerfect Programs Two (2) Lotus 1-2-3 Programs Two (2} Harvard Graphics The total cost will not exceed $2,200. One Computer will be utilized by the Traffic Division. We have a commitment from the Sheriff's Board of Deputy Chief's to provide us with computerized accident reconstruction software that would allow the Traffic Division to generate computer drawn factual drawings of accident scenes. One of the benefits of this system wculd be LhE 6ignif Kant savings iil D££Ic:er man hours Vtili??d to generate these factual diagrams. In addition, the computer will be utilized to generate administrative reports and also to run our computerized vehicle towing program. The second computer will be utilized by the station commander and administrative lieutenant to generate administrative reports and projects requested by City Council, Commissions, and City staff. 3 Asset Seizure Expenditures October 17, 1990 Page 3 AUDIO ItiTBLLIG6lICS DEVIC& One (1) Unitel 145 Intel System with attachments The total cost will not exceed $5,719. The station is working more and more cases where conversation among participants in criminal activity is crucial evidence, especially in sex crime cases. At the present time, the station has to contact other law enforcement agencies to borrow their device. Often times a device is not available, and investigations lack the additional evidence which is needed. With the acquisition of. the above listed device or "Fargo Unit," as they are commonly referred to, the Detective Bureau would enhance their investigations by having the additional evidence. }IOBILB RADAR DIBpLAY one (1) Mobile Radar The total cost will not exceed $7,920. The station has been exploring Various methods to address concerns about vehicles speeding in certain residential areas and on streets ...Hero ..m ha..e l:mitnA nanahil itv fnr anfnrrtemcM with marked _n071CP_ units. The majority of speeding violations occur due to inattention on the part of the driver. When reminded of their speed, many drivers obey the speed limit. We have evaluated visual display monitoring devices and found that the jurisdictions who have used radar activated visual displays have been quite successful in reducing speeds in targeted areas. We propose purchasing a solar powered radar trailer which will give a visual display of vehicle speed and at the same time show the driver the speed zone in which they are traveling. It is our belief that this tool will enable us to reduce speeds in diea9 pf concern without the expense an3 lcn4-teen commitment requires if wa were to assign a police officer to an area for the purpose of spend reduction. All of the proposed items will be purchased through the City and will remain the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. JBF/tlr JBF:548 3~1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: An thea Ha rtig, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION 50-04 - ROTH'S STOP.E AND PDST OFFICE - Consideration of a recommendation to designate Roth's Stare and Post Office, located at 7157 Amethyst, as an Historic Landmark - APN: 202-151 -01. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Cormni~sion rP.commends to the City Council a Landmark Designation for Rath 's Store and Past Office (also known as Ernie's Placel. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Mr. Edward Ca ppa relli, the owner of the historic structure, approached staff regarding a Landmark Designation as he wished to rehabilitate the poured concrete building and restore it close to its original appearance. At the October 4, 1990 Historic Preservation Commf ssion meeting, both the Landmark Designation a nnl iratinn and a landma r4 A11P rafinn PP rmif WP ro rovievod end a n..od The Franklin Roth family moved the operation of their germ ral store from the corner of Hellman and 19th Street to its present location following the completion of the Pacific Electric Railroad in 1913. The family was the first business owner to relocate above the new tracks. For his new store, Mr. Roth had built a large, square, concrete structure with expansive street-facing windows and a Mission Revival-styled parapet. In the rear, corrugated tin was wrapped around a wooden frame to form a shed which served as storage space for the store and also as Alta Loma 's Post Office. Not surprisingly, Mr. Roth served as the town's Postmaster from 1909-1918. After Prohibi Lion ended, the Ernie beer hall business in the old store ~V el tilai YIV ad sid I11U well (I IrI f:Pd Ca ppa relll, however rediscovered drywall from the interior. Ha 11 family began a restaurant and Sometime in the 1950's or 1960's, VPr LfIP <terP fr(1n} wlndewCi Mr_ these windows after removing the Whether as a store and post office or restaurant and beer halt, the structure located at 7151 Pmethyst Avenue served as a nexus of community activity far the young citrus-growing area. Although modest by today's standards, the building represented a firm commitment both in time and resources to the emerging town. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LO 90-04 - ROTH'S STORE AND POST OFFICE October 11, 1990 Page 2 Resp lly su ted r:ra r City P nner RB:AH:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - October 4, 1990 HPC Staff Report Resolution of Approval 37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT LATE: October 4, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FR"uM: Larry J, rie nderson, A1CP, Principal Planner BY: An ihea M. Ha rti9, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: LANDMARK DESIGNATION 90-04 - ROTH'S STORE AN6 POST OFFICE - Consideration of an application to designate Roth 's Store and Post Office as an Historic Landmark, located at 7157 Amethyst Avenue .- APN: 202-I51-O1 SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The building known historically as Roth's Store and Post Office is located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, due north of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks in the old downtown of Alta Loma. The site is ]ev el and 0,7 acres in size. For this report, the "site" is the land upon which the structure stands. B. Site Land Use. Zon inp, and the General Plan Site - Little vegetation grows presently on the site. Other than the structure itself, the most distinguishing r. ha rac teris tic of the site is the remains of a finished stone retaining wall, approximately three feet high, running the length of the southern property line. Zoning - Due in part to the historic growth of the citrus growing area, the site and its surrounds exhibited and exhibit a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The General Plan designates the site and the land to the immediate north and west a5 General Commercial. To the south, a Medium-High designation applies. Within blocks of the site, however, the Surround!.^.g zoning turns purely residential with Low. Med iu_m. and High designations. ~ ~ ~ ' General Plan - The General Plan also specifies the development of a Neighborhood Center Plan (Overlay District) for the Old Alta Loma area. Consideration cf the following measures is mandated: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LANDMARK OESI GN ATION 90-04 - ROTH'S STORE b POST OFFICE October 4, 1990 Page 2 Re tpnt ion of the "old town" character by use of period architecture and adaptive reuse of older buildings. Establishment of a special st reetscape design for the commercial area along Pmethyst Avenue north of Base Line Road. Establish standards for pedestrian oriented commercial developments in the "old Lawn" area. III[-91) Architectural Description: The main portion of the structure is a rectangular, single-storied, flat roof, poured concrete form with a parapet wrapping around the south, west istreetl, and north elevations. Traces of the wall molds are still visible on the poured concrete walls. Under the facade's existing vertical wood siding remains most of the original storefront. Originally divided into two equal bays, the north fenestration bay consists of four rows each of an outwardly opening, single-paned window atop a large, rectangular, single-light window, The south bay of the facade imitates the north but here the shoD's entrance door was found. Attached to and flush with the north-east corner of the concrete structure remains a roughly framed room with corrugated metal covering the exterior walls and low-pitched gable root. N Vertical board door alongside a nohow metal door is found on the east elevation's north end. Also, connected to and flush with the concrete structure's south- east corner is a small rec to ngu lar lean-to sheathed in plywood siding and rolled roofing material, respectively. Roof- mounted stave pipe and exhaust fan equipment extend from the roof of this shed and the fenestration patterns consists of a single, plywood covered door on the south elev aiion and a similar door and a multi-light window on the east side. Structural clues indicate that this lean-to served as the kitchen for the bar which operated in the structure. This building's only clue to any stylist characteristics lies in Lhe stepped parapet which is, in a vernacular expression, remini sc ant of the Mi55 ion Ray iyal $fyla (gaa Fxhihit "HPLf- t "~I. A small, rectangular, wooden framed and slatted vent is centered along the top of the parapet. In terms of other detailing, the southern property line is marked by a finished stone retaining wall approximately three feet in height and one-hundred feet in length. 39 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LANDMARK DESIGN ATiON 90-04 - ROTH'S STORE b POST OFFICE October 4, 1990 Page 3 II, ANALYSIS: Backg rou nd: The owner of the property, Mr. Edward Ca ppa rell i, contacted staff in July regarding the landmark designation and alteration processes for the struc~:u re. Keeping preservation in the family, Mr. Cappa relli follows the rehabilitation work his daughter and son-in-law have ~i ccomplished in their home and scud ios, the Alta Lama Fire Hall ~a local Landmark). Under separate cover, Mr. Cappa relli has also submitted a Landmark Alteration Permit package 190-Ofi). B. Sig nificance: Historical - As the town known as ]oa mosa adopted the name Alta Loma in 1913, the center of activity shifted from Hellman Avenue and 19th Street to Amethyst Street. For this was the area of two significant changes -- the completion of the Pacific Electric Railway and the subsequent construction of the Alta Loma Heights Citrus Packing House. In 1915, down from Hellman moved the businesses ~f the Ioamosa store and post office which the Franklin Rq~:h family purchased from Charles N. Frost of Etiwanda six years earlier. Mr. Roth was the sixth Ioamosa postmaster, acca rd ing to Martha Gaines Stoebe, as he followed Maurice A. Alexander, 1895-1994; William Jones, 1899-1901; Melville J. Casey, 1901-1903; J.M. Case, 1903-1907; and Mr. frost, 1.901.1909, He was the first grocer/postmaster to imDOrt a useful delivery truck in 1912 !see photograph Exhibit "HPC-2"1. 8y 1917, the Roth flamily's goods were neatly stacked in the new concrete store. This material of permanency surpassed the wood and corrugated tin of the earlier Ioa mosa store which agz in, according to Ms. Stoebe, the Ro th 's moved to a location ,just north of his new truiiding. The store/post office changed hand> in quick succession throughout Lhe 19205. Ourirg those years Gordon Billings opened his own store two lots north of the Roth store after having first worked for the Roth family. In 1929, owner J.J. Peters sold the entire structur~ to Ernie Hall who ran a pool hall and a bar until his death. The Histor of Alta Loma California 1880-'980, (Alta Loma: Bb5 Publishing Company, 1981 93, 97-98. Ibid., 104. (Q HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LANDMARK DESIGNATION 90-04 - ROTH'S S70RE 6 POST OFFICE October 4, 1990 Page 4 The histo rical context of this building relays the speedy and sure growth of the new citrus town of Alto Loma in the teens and twenties. The ownership and use patte rn5 also mirror significant local and national events such as the importance to this rural area of maintaining communication by rail and by post; the creation of a citrus-consuming public; and the effects of prohibition, to name just a few. Both as a general store and as a heer hall, the structure served as an arena for community interaction. Architectural - The history and shape of this structure serves to deepen our contextual understanding of the nature of life in early Alta Loma. ',he modest interpretation of the then trendy Mission Revival style when coupled with the expansive storefront windows and concrete construction reveal the time, dedication, and money the Rath family and athe rs tike them invested in keeping the newly dubbed Alta Loma up-to-date and well-supplied. Issues - There are no particularly controversial matters in this case. In terms of loss of historic fabric, the structure's exterior has been relatively unaltered. Staff does request that the Commission consider whether or not referring to the huild ing as the Roth Store and Post Office is acceptable or appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: in accordance with Historic Preservation ureinance Sec Lion 't.'14,U90, the following points of sfgnifican~e appear to pertain to the Roth Store and Post Office: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, type, style, or way of life. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. And, the proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the nefahhorhp4d rnmml pity; and f.f fy, IV, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission designate one of the few remaining examples of early twentieth-century local, commercial structures, the Roth Store and Post Office, as Landmark 90-04. /~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LANDMARK DESIGNATION 90-04 - ROTH'S STORE E POST OFFICE October 4, 1990 Page 5 Respectfully submitted, Lar~~erson, AICP Pr ;c ;pal Planner BB:LJ H/j fs Attachments: Exhibit "HPC-1" - Mission Revival Style Rooflines Exhibit "HPC-2" - Photographs Exhibit "HPC-B" - Topo & Site Map Exhibit "HPC-4" - Landmark Application Resolution ~d ~'~ ~'q ~~: ~~ ~~~ , c ~~ I IIII I ~~~~~ ~.__ ~r .N_~ _ .,~ ,... ,,,.~, _ `~ ~~w~~~.~ Ms S::s ~ ..m- ~~lfiC~S.: VIRbrIN1A d.ND ~ M~A6t8'(GR~ GELD wuioe ?D w*+~~uu +buSCtiS~ p.1il Item: QDNA6FDl2S Tltie: Minion Rno~IlY1As `~3 ~t• Pc- 6oHe• .... ~c~MOSk s FIRST t~1,tvER-( "TRUC-K W IT~-F ~~1`R RA'iN r 1iLWPRD CL~/I^(~-r fR,I411CUfJ (26[I-F r ~ h41 LSD RCfi+' CLOT Td ~~,~-~, c..1912 Original F'ccr_ t~,~41~y ar~7i ST,,n.ID~uc~ ~clF {MS Sjt~RE~ c.19~ ~N ~r -ra r~~+-T: atLpks e,aa~acc, Bu.untt~fsn~naac~, >31,~crb t~a(~ , ~7F+i~CRNtE~ bE k?:LL ~+++erl- u~~- ~ +ttstnw~. ~tcx~s+s Sou.vCa SMartG~a Esines Sty-Iaar 'ihe ~1i HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONMZSSION LANDMARK SURVEY Addzese: ~~S~ AME`(]}~u~~"~' 9~ APt ~Z,•Irj1~0~ . ~~ (D y\Vb.l d a[iB"MI\[ i iu\~.\A1ii ~ rni~p r'~At[! t7 ~' d VSsx Looking Date of Photo , ~~: ~'k ~` .. View Looking $ Date of Photo ~~T ~, LJH3 ~~ ~,X4r4t~1~' NPC - 2b HISTORIC~IPRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address:~llJ~ ~~~• AP~~J.SI-~ c6 7 d i la I~ Viaw Lookinq Date of Photoi LJH3 ~P HPC-2C Date of Photo n aBPT 90 , HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: '}~C~~ ~{.~,.(Lc~J.VCT ~ AP1 ~02~-1~ -O'Z ®riginal Poor i~uta:.~y Date of Photo t7 36p1' qp LJH3 View Looking i4D~[~j HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address:'~I~i~ aMETl1~'r $'~ AP~2t>2-15"I~tYL ,:. _Y~ ~~ ';, ~ _r_., . k ' ~y'"~'F].~~` 2 r 1t~/ ~. View Lookinq 0~1} Date of Photo I'1 S`6PT~~ \\ View Date of Photo ~"~." 2Pi HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address:~J~ ~tM~~ ~. AP~'ZO'Z•1~•PZ --~- ~ri~irta(_Poor Qua;~iy Date of Photo 115FPT a1D View LookinV . c~i ieem:'1ovo~_ ~n~• Rwfn'a SFort N -, ~ ~wnlt' ecHe• - Crty nt flancho Cucamonga Appl rent von for HISTORIC LANDgARR DESIGNdTI01' HISTORIC PORT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION X Historic Lttndmark Hvstorvc Po in: pf Interest IUE::TIFICATION ,. Common Name: Frnie's Place 2. Nrsto ric Name, ii known: Id~t`l's Store & Post Cf flee 3. Street or Rural Address: 7157 Am'.th}•st City: Alta iara Z:o: 91701 countq: San Pemardino assessor's Parcel No. 202-151-O1 Zone: G.C. :.::gal Description: Int 1G of Alta Iomd Tract Site M1. Present Owner, tf kpown:L'dward (zrxaarelli Atldress:7;`CSESTii City: NcaIRO.ga_ ZiP: 91730 OwnersE Sp is: Public_ - priv¢te~` 5. Present L'se: Vacant Original Ese: SP'lerdl StOYe Other past uses: Bef.'.T' Hai ]. DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly' lase: ibe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and tle sc ribe any maJ or alteratians Srom its original condixion: A sirwle etGJrv. : i'ita ri an ttmctnra of Mth MIL Eij COrv~rat aeN ,ryyi Fr .~/:mt.il ei?irn. - -tr~.t facade's steGned parapet gives .it a vernacular Mission Sb,•le. Tne structure's original store-r_mnt windows re~re in nrclrr T. Loc as r~onBs~eui ~h mn (draw h label d. A p ppraximate property size: s vte antl surrounding streets, Lot Size (in feed roatls, and Prominent landmarks): Frontage Depth or approx. acreage 0-j - 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent b. Good c. Fair X d. Deter isratetl e. No longer in existence_ 0. Is the feature: a. Altered h. Unaltered?_~_ 1. Surroundings: (check mare than one if necessary) ¢. np.,p ls.,n_ b. Residenti¢1 X c. Scattered buildings X d. Densel l' built-up e. Commercial X f. Intlu strial g. Other RailLroad * vertical woodent siding which covers the facade frgn growl to approximately I the roof line. I+PC - 4a 12. Threats to Site: a. None known_~ b. Private de velopment_ c. Zoning_ d. Public gcrks Pro,j ect_ e. Vantlalism_ f. Other__ 13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s) Septenber 17, 1990; 1987 SOTE: The follow!nR (Items 14-19) are for structures only. 14. Primary erterlor building material: a. St one_ b. Brlck_ c. Stucco d. Adobe e. Nood X 1. Other Concrete 15. Is the Structure: a. On its original site? X h, Yoved? c. 16, Year of In Stial Construction: 1915 TA1S Date is: a. Factual b. Estimatetl X _ 1S. Architect (ii known): Vtw v^a' 18. guilder (if known) 19. Related Peatures: a. Barn b, Carriage house c. Outhouse d. Shed(s)_ e. Formal Gartlev(s) f. Ain dm ill g. 11¢tertower/tan kbouse b. Other Retwinirvr call 1. None SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state Historical and/or architectural importance (Snclude dates, events, end persona asaoc iated with the site when known): •Tne 13th tamiiy xas ills first provider of food atxi lreii to _ the newly foin~3 downtown of Alta Irn)a. The concrete store ~ .r..ln n4 ..~...r~nlalinn of •fir f1.rn. f+nvi.. \,i nn~.+.. Cww.:..~1 style but it representai a solid investmnt >n the growing citrGS-pmdvcitg area. 21. Ya in theme of tAO Historic resource: (check only one): a. AreH3tecture b. Arts h Leisure c. Economic/In dustrlal K d. Government e. Exploration/Set[lement 1. Military g. Raliglon h. Social /Educat lan 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal Sntervlews, antl their dates: Cow gill ~,~a. ~r»bra_a_tnp on Seok. 17. 1990; Martha Gaines Stoebe, The History of Alta .trngi, California ><:~Pn:rxv: __ 23. Date form prepared 9/21/90 By (name ): Atlthea Hart14 Andreas: 10500 Civic Center city: Far)eM Cucalm,~gtl a Zip: 91730 Pbooe: (7141 898-1861 Organlzntion: City of Fanctlo Cucannma City Uae Only w1880-1980 (Alta Iona: BSS Publishing Col~any, 1981), bald Lee PYAllester, A Field C11i.de to l4npsican Nouses (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1988). RESOLUTION N0. 90_08 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 90-04 TO DESIGNATE ROTH'S STORE AND POST OFFICE LOCATED AT 1151 AMETHYST AVENUE AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK - APN: 202-151-01. A. Recitals. (i) Edward Cappa relli has filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." (ii) On October 4, 1990, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. n n., .,.,,,...:.... __,:_. ,_,.. n , _. basically a triangular configuration, located at 7157-Amethyst Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 4, 1990, including written and ora', staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Hfstorical and Cultural Significance: Finding: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of Life. ~,n 1e• AfVer the COmp1 Ct'.On ni the Pacific Elec trit may and the Alta Loma Netghts Citrus Packing House in 1914, the Roth family's store and post office served the new downtown area of Alta Loma. A modest and utilitarian structure, it serves as a reminder of the commitment and hardwork which individuals invested fn the growing but small citrus-producing area. .~3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 90-08 LD 90-04 - ROTH'S STORE b POST OFFICE October 4, 1990 Page 2 Fi nd ina: 2. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. Facts: The Roth Stare and Post Office is one of the oldest existing structures of its type and original use. b. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. Fi nd ina: i, The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Facts: Although a few sf gnificant structures have been lost, the core of Old Alta Loma remains and this building is critical to the historic nature of the n2 ighborhood. Finding: 2. The proposed landmark in its location rep reseris an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community or city. Facts: Existing for 15 years, the Roth Store and Post Uffice, later the beer hall Ern ie's Place, has been a prominent feature of the Old Alta Loma downtown. Its proxfmity to the railroad tracts and to the c.1913 packing house, due south and east respectively, make the structure an important visual landmark. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the protect has been reviewed and considered far compliance with Lhe California Fnv;rnrmn~~al ~.._+,~y "ct ~, iii u. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, Lhis Lommission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 4th day of October 1990 of Landmark Application. 6. The Chairman of this Cammissi on sha 17 certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APP ED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1990. Bob Schmidt, Chairman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: gRNER, BANKS, BILLINGS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON SCHMIDT NOES; COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE .J RESOLUTION N0. 90-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 90-06 FOR ROTH'S STORE AND POST OFFICE, 1157 AMETHYST AV F.NUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA - APN: 202-151-01 WHEREAS, the Histe ric PrEServa tion Conenission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all continents nn the proposed !a.^.c,"•a rk Oesigna lien. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed all input regarding said landmark Alteration Permit. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have accu rred. NOW, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as fellows: SECTION I: The application applies to the building located at Assessor's Parcel Number 202-151-0t. SECTION II: The proposed landmark alteration meets the following criteria es to Dlished in Chapter 2.24.120 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade: FACT: The action proposed is consistent with the ou rnntec of this Ao<n hrt:n.. FI NOING: The proposed alterations pose no threat to the historical integrity of the structure. Rather, the desired changes will restore the building close to its original look. The building needs attention and rehabilitation which the proposed alterations will provide. FACT: The action proposed will not be detrimental to a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic nature. FINDING: The outstanding structural, aesthetic, and historical elernen tc will hn_ pregeryed _r.^ ..^ha nc ed by the proposed changes. SECTION III; This Landmark Alteration Permit is exempt from CEQA (Article 10, Section 15301). 55 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 90-05 LAP 90-06 - ROTH'S STORE AND POST OFFICE October 4, 1990 Page 2 SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence reviewed by this Commission and based on the findings set forth above, NOw, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ra oche Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission does hereby approve Landmark Alteration Permit 90-06 for alterations to the Rath's Store and Post Office as described in the October 4, 1990 Staff Report, with the following conditions: 1. Alterations and rehabilitation shall comply with the Project Desc riptiun included in this naport. Historic preservation staff shall review and approve final huild ing plans prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Historic Preservation Commission, if building permits are not issued within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval. 3. The Historic Building Code shall apply to this project. 4. Any material samples (pa in colors, awning type and color, etc.) shall be submitted to the Historic Preservation staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. If the existing bathroom and its effect on the most southern storefront windows remains an issue, staff will review and a pp rave the final treatment, prior to the issuance of tenant improvement permits. fi. Fvorv offnrt chnn lA ha maAa to ractnra tha ctnrcfrnnt windnwc ac carefully as possible and by following the guidelines forwarded in the Secretary of Irate riot's Preservation Brief 9: The Repair of Historic Nooden Nindows (Exhl6it "3"). 7. Staff will approve the final exterior paint color prior to the issuance of building permits. APPROVE OPTED THIS H D Y OF OCTO E 1990 BY: Bob Schmidt, Chairman AYES; COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BANKS, BI!LINGS, COOPER, HASKVCTZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 5 Co RESOLUTION N0. 90 ~~ Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK N0. 90-04, THEREBY DESIGNATING ROTH'S STORE AND POST OFFICE (KNOWN AS ERNI E'S PLACE), LOCATED AT 7157 AMETHYST AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK. WHEREAS, the City Louncil has held a duly advertised public hearing to co"sides all ^^nnen is an the proposed Landmark Designs lion and issued Resolution No. 90-OB approving the said as a Landmark. WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. . NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby specifically find, determine, and resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The application applies to property located at Assessor Pa reel Number 202-I51-O1. SECTION 2: Mr. Franklin Roth and his family moved the operation of the I oamo sa general store and post office to a site due north of the newly- completed Pacific Electric railway tracks in 1915. Ioamosa became Alta Loma and the store/post office became a restaurant and beer hall and continued to serve as a nexus of community actfv ity for the growf na citrus-nrnHi~r;"" ,tee, The proposed landmark meets the following criteria established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Min is ipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural significance. 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period and way of life; the early development of Alta Loma. 2. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of of its kind; it is one of the oldest commercial/civic buildings in the area. B. Neighborhood and Gang ra phic Setting 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Z. The proposed landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and City (Ord. 70 S9, 1979). ~7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. LD 90-04 - ROTH'S STORE S POST OFFICE October 17, 1990 Page 2 SECTION 3: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Section 15300 . SECTION 4: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this Ccu nc it and based on the findings set forth above. NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga approves designation of Roth's Store and Post Office (kr~~ as Ernie'; Place) as an Historic Landmark. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CL`CANONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October i1, 1990 i0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Nillie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION OF A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR RETENTION BASIN AND unni rox"e rva, aiuea - ixnci mwr iawzo a request to vacate a emporary Basemen or gra ng an construction of Retention Basin, Earthen Berms and Drainage Facilities located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and 19th Street. RECO!lEIDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the summary vacation of a temporary easement for retention basin and drainage facilities on Tract 13525 located on the southwest corner oP Highland Avenue and 19th Street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Final Map for Tract 12952 was approved by the City Council on October 15, 1986, and as part of the conditions of approval for said nap, a temporary easement for eradi na anA rnncirurti nn of rotantinn haein narf ham h"rme anA drainage facilities located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and 19th Stret was dedicated to the City. On August 19, 1990, the developer, Glenfed Development Corporation, has filed a request to vacate said temporary easement since flood measures were completed and the temporary easement is no longer needed. The Streets and Highways code states that the City can summarily vacate the easement. The subiect temporary easement is described per attached exhibits "A" and "B". On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission determined that said easement vacation wou)d conform to the General Plan and recommended approval of the vacation. Respectfully submitted, 5~=+~?' Q ~G rxin ~~~~ Shintu Bose Deputy City Engineer SB:NV:,ih Attachment 7 RESOLUTION N0. 90 '3 7 ! A RESOLUTION~OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR RETENT70N BASIN AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES ON TRACT 13425 NHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8333, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a temporary easement for retention basin and drainage facilitt es hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said temporary easement for retention basin and drainage facilities is no longer required since recent flood measures were completed. NON, THEREFORE, BE !T RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ma ecl's it;s order vacating that said temporary easement on Nap V-099 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said temporary easement no longer const/Lutes a public service easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution~To a recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Sa» Bernardino County, California. lD EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Temporary Easement for Grading and Construction of RetentlOn dd51n~_ ELYLnBn aerI115 dnC _ Urat n_aga FaciTffles Being a portion of Section 36. Township 1 North, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Tract No. 9587 as recorded 1n Map Book 137, Pages 90-92, Records of San Bernardino County, California; thence along the Easterly line of said tract South 0' 24' 55" East 892.40 feet; thence South 31' 40' 17" East 60.00 feet to a point an a curve concave to the East and havin4 a radius of 20.00 feet with a radial line through said point bearing South 31' 40' 17" East; thence a]ong said curve through a central angle of 87~ 46' 06" an arc distance 38.88 feet to a paint on a tangent curve concave to the Northeast and having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence along sold curve through a central angle of 92' 06' 54" an arc distance of 32.15 feet to a point of compound curve concave to the Northwest and havingg a radius of 1,456.00 feet with a radial line through said point bearing NortA x.11' 33' 17" Nest; thence along said curve through a central angle of I6 55' 52" an arc distance of 430.25 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence North 41' 30' S1" EasL 544.46 feet t0 a point on a tangent curve concave to the Southwest and having a radius of 1,344.00 feet; thence along said curve through a centrai angle of 28' 27' 42' an arc distance of 667.63 feet Lo a point on a nnn.rsnn.n! !!... ~'!t." - rdGTa I;ne i.nrvugb sale point bearing South 20' 0' 27' East, ss1d~ point aiso being on the Southerly line of Highland Avenue f66 feet wide); thence along said line South 89' 27' S2" Nest 1,331.21 feet to the point of beginning. I~xw 9r ~` _''- ~` ~,4 ~I ~~~° ~I 8 k'= ~ ~ S :Z m ~ I ~t~0111'( OF O~fanINNING" u.¢. wz.se.NO gya1 i ~ ui~u~tr~ cv~~. rs~~lsr roe GP.~J I tJGi f ~1% ~ ILwI~lT, OF R2Q2nIT~I Z'061F1~ ~ •"+ ro^,NOk~ FC[•IUTtrc9. `~ r YG'11 ~_ tl' O ~4 i l_IV 1. ~. wl. / / ~S ~~ r .- 2 ~v ~' y v ~_ \~; -- ~~' ~6~ ~~ ~~ s U,12Ni gcTC, a ~ ~ ~ 6~'Qfo'GYo' 2o.A7 ~i0•~o4' 1~ ?2'an' Sh" , 24.oa' ~2.~9' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIVEIItIIdG DIVISION :i 1~:: h /7p~ lJ //~ 1TEY: ~~: E7~IIBPk "B „ - CITI' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DRTE: October S, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Depu by City Engineer BY: SUBJECT: Jeff Barnes, Maintenance Superintendent, Parks and Landscaping APPROVAL TO AMFIRD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NUMBERS 1 AND 5, TO LANDSCAPE NEST OF ANAHEIM, CA. IN TFIE MIOIXrT OF f97,752.00, 70 ~ FUNDED BY LANDSCM'E MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 1 AND 9, ACCOIMT NUMBERS 40-4130-6028 AND 44-4130-6028 RESPECTIVELY. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the award and authorize the execution of the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Lanoscape Maintenance Districts numbers 1 and 5, fOr the balance of fiscal year 1940-1991 to the lowest responsible bidder, Landscape West of Anaheim Ca. in the amount of ;97,752.00 «.. tie s••.,.,...a ,... - - --- -, ---~~••~ •••~•~•~~• ~ w puce ally Yti-YtJV-euGb respectively. The contract is renews blv for an additional 3 years on a year io year basis starting July 1, 1991. Background/Analysis Per previous Council action, bitls were solicited, received and opened on Thursday, September 27, 1990. Landscape West was the lowest responsible bidder able to provide the highest service level at the lowest cost (bid summary attached). Staft has reviewed all bitls and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Respectfully Submittepd~p SB:JB:jb Attachment cc: Jerry Fulwaod, Deputy Gity Manager Bob 2etterberg, Public Works Maintenance Manage Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor Dan Gentry, Maintenance Supervisor 0 w m ^ i 0 0 z u o ~ u `a h ~ z < o o u O N ~ O q q W O ) ~ u H ~ W ~ o ~ ~ i ~ q E 2 O N • ~ gW° O i °n 0 e 1°V Yql M N M1 u m c ~ q a c 2 i q w ~ n o h • u y a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n j J C ~ ~ t V ~ O 0 U V Q O q O 9 W < [ i ce : " o O V r ~ ~. p O f. ~) O N> C a > q j ~ q~ j V O 6 W • ~ ~ ] .h. -'' iin= C• l C) a e i ~ • V h) N ~ O l N q q q N W~ q N a m _ E e C ) ~ ^ L G N ~ q [ O f v 9 u i ° i i o i ~ J i --CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October e, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shinto Bose, Deputy Citv Engineer BV: Jeff Barnes, Maintenance Superintendent, Parks and Landscaping SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ANARD FIND AUTHORIZATION FOR E%ECUTION FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NUMDERS 2 AND 4, TO LANDSCAPE NEST OF ANAHEIM, CA. IN THE FV70l1NT OF 1236,331.00, TO BE FUNDED BV LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 2 AND 4. ACCOLIN7 NUMBERS 41-4130-6028 AND 43-4130-602'8 RESPECTIVELY. Recammentlation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the award and authorize the execution of the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Can tract for Landscape Maintenance Distrscts numbers 2 and 4, fpr the balance of fiscal year 1990-1991 to the lowest responsible bidder, Landscape West of Anaheim Ca. in the amount of !236,331.00 to ha funded by a.-~nnnt ~~~Tti~ n~_n._ ___.. ...1.. .. ..v~u respectively. The contract is renewable for`anmadditional 3Vyears on a year to year basis starting July 1, 1991. Background/Analysis Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on Thursday, September 27, 1990. Landsca pr West was the lowest responsible bidder able to provide the highest service level at the lowest cost (bid summary attached). Staff has reviewed all bids and tound them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Respectfully Submitted, ~,~ic..,ti~ ~ ..,r, SB:JB;jb Attcchment cc: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Bob Zetterberg, Public Works Main bnanc• Manage ~' Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor Don Gentry, Main tenanc^ Supervisor S u 0 i x C O F W o° 0 0 O N D 1 0 0 •. O b ~ l ~ O ` F ~ Z n O F 0 w 'o G N ~ n • E m i Y q O m O J ~ ~ p b P N N V N M C a ~ w • b i ~ z ~ m n ~ • i m rv - i F w 0 r > p f rv ~ b N O ~ M 2 V b b 3 [ e 0 ; E m Q ~ b V u O ± O : ~ 6 _ J b N 1 r G M p ~ ~ • E Y _ 6 j U n O " N ~ ~ ~ u o n _ ~ _ - o n o - n a i ~ ~~ i o _ ~ _ o ~ o b J L ~ V~ b V C C 1 Y o V E ~ l y~ o • • w p 4 ~ u s y V u u E •v ~ w C ~ T a Y a M ^ M1 b ~ i u' c c i a ° C L O ~ L i O 6 : N s o u ~ „ N s° s s r e ~ ~ - CITY OF RANC[i0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ORTE: October ~@, 1990 i~+ T0: City Council and City Manager '^~ FRAM: Shinto Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Jetf Barnes, Main tenancy Superintendent, Par Y.s and Landscaping SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ANARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR GENERRL FUND AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTR/CTS NUMBERS 3A AND 3B TO MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES INC. OF SO. EL MONTE CA. IN THE AMOl1NT OF (98,731.00 TO BE FUNDED 8Y GENERAL FUND AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 3A AND 3H, ACCOUNT NUMBERS 01-4647-6028, 42-4130-6028 AND 46-4130-6028 RESPECTICELV. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the award antl authorize thy execution of the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for General Fund and Landscape Maintenance Districts nu.-tiers 3A and 38, 4or the balance of fiscal year 1990-1991 to the iowvst responsible bidder, Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises Inc. of So. E1 Monte Ca. in the amount o1 f98,731.00 to be funtled by aCCOUn! numhyrs 07-4/.67-4nOO n~-nl~n_~Q~~ _„-~~ ~100_c~~c respectively. The contract is renewably for an additional 3 yyars on a year to year basis starting July 3, 1991. Background{gnalysis Per previous Council action, bids were splici ted, received and open ed on Thursday, September 27, 1990. Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder able to provide the highest service Isvel •t the lowest cost (bid summary attached). Staff has reviewed all bids and found them to be complyte and in accordance with the bid requirements. Respyclfully Subm~fi tted, 58:JB:lb Attachmynt cc: Jerry Fulwood, Oyputy City Manager Bob Zetterberq, Public Works Main [enancy Manager Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor ~ Don Gm try, Maintenance Supervisor 7 V i a J V p _O U Y a O F J U N °m i i i a h u 0 `s h 0 `o u m i o E 10 < ~ N G y O ~ 9 C j H Y 9 A W y ~ C j V n E O + ~ O G ~ - C + T [ Y • : W ~ C ~ C i ~ D ~ ~ U n _ • c u J O h O W h O a G J W w m 0 m m W ~ _ P O O M l n _ o V J [ Y ~ ~ C + [ ~ N > l ] [ N C C ~ 0 ~ C ~ V~ [ Y Y O V i i O V ~~ ~ V E T T C O~ U• h Y l Y V ~ O~~ O N C O Y p y I G • ~. 14 u. h W V -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: ~ Shtntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement with San Bernardino County Flood Control Distric*_ for authorization of expenditure of Day ~ Creek Protect funds and Approval of Agreement with The Metropolitan Nater District of Southern California (MID) for Planning, Constructing, Maintaining and Usfng Drain Line Facilities extending from MID site, which is located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, westerly, approximately one mite, to the Day Creek Channel. Cit, share will be (545,000 of the total estimated project cost of (5,545,000 using funds already allocated for work in this area from the Day Creek Project. RECq/EIDIITIOM: It is recaamenced that the City Councii approve the sub,)ect agreements with the San Bernardino County Flood Control Oistrict (S.B.C.F.C,D.) and Metropolitan Nater District of Southern California (MiD) and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. BACKGROUND/ANIVL!'S IS The City bad, as part of the Day Creek Protect, anticipated installation of a storm drain facility within Arrow Route connecting to the Day Creek Channel. MIO also has a need fora dratnage facility within Arrow Route to accoaeaodate i:helr on site dratnage as well as an emergency discharge line. Processing of the agreement with MID will result in them being responsible for processing of the design and construction of a signal ,lotnt use drain line facility. The Clty is obligated, per the agreement, to pay MID (545,000.00 of the total anticipated cost of f5,545,000.00. Payment to MID will not commence until a~'ter construction starts and x111 be paid as outlined in the agreement. The City's share will be from funds already allocated for Day Creek fIV411121es gtiM1 agreement with S.D.C.€.C.0, authorizes use of Day Creek Pro,lect Funds for payment to MID. Thus these agreements do not: result in any increase expenditure from the Day Creek Project but will provide for a storm drain facility of mutual benefit. CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT SBCFCD qND NMD AGREEMENTS OCTOBER 17, 1990 PAGE 2 San Bernardino County Flood Control is aware of this agreeiaent and is processing their own agreearent with MNG to provide for the connection to Day Creek Channel . Respectfully submitted, ~~~ ~~~ SB:OJ:Iv 70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BAUER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - For the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Vesting Tentative Tract 14475 located north of Almond Street, west of Sapphire Street, not to exceed E39,905, with set amount to be reimbursed by the applicant. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council award the contract and execute the Professional Services Agreement. BACKGROUND: Saha ma Investments, lnc. has submitteG an application for the develapment of 70 single family lots on ll3 acre; of land lava ted north of Almond Street, east of Cucamonga Wash, and west of Sapphire Street. This area was the subject of a prev tous Envf ronmental Impact Rannrt fnr r lfi lnt cnhd ivic inn and a rala tad 96 arro mactar nlan that was reviewed by the City .n 1985. Based on staff's review of the current proposal, significant changes over that which was previously reviewed exist that warrant preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report. Under the present guidelines, `he preparation of an Environmental impact Report (EIR) will be conducted by a consultant selected by the City with the cost of the report, plus administration casts, to be reimbursed 6y the applicant. After discussing the proposal with various firms, 1t was agreed to by the City and Sahama Investments, Inc. that Bauer Environmental Services would be used to prepare the subsequent E[R, Sandra Bauer of Bauer Environmental Services was the project manager for the preparation of the previous EIR. Because of her experience with the City and familiarity with the project, it was felt that. Bauer Env ii ariaieii tai Gr. rv icri wns Eh++ mn<P. nunll Fi ad to rnnducf the cnhcenuont EIR. -- ~ - --- ~- Attached for your review is the Professiona', Services Agreement with Bauer Environmental Services, including the scope of services, timeline, and fee schedule. The total amount of the contract for the project is E39,905 (an additional amount of b7 ,981 will be collected to cover administrative costs). CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VTT 14475 OCTOBER 11, 1990 Page 2 Res pe y suU ted, 6 Brad r City P anner BB :S M:mlg Attachments: Location Map Professional Services Agreement 7~- HILL CTIY OF ~ UCAMpNGA ~M' /~ i~szs PLAN _„~, ION TTY' ~'~/lON MAa ~y • .. e~, !._,i ~~ EJQ~Tf; SCALE: - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: City Council and Ctty Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Nil lie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Lien Rights related to Reimbursement Agreement for Frontage Improvements for Assessor Parcel Nos. 209-142-14, 209-142-15, 209-142-17 and 209-142-34 located south of Arrow Highway, east of Haven Avenue submitted by Barton Development Company and Utica-Haven Associates RECOMMEMDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing lien rights related to Reimbursement Agreement for Frontage Improvements for Assessor Parcel Nos. 209-142-14, 209-142-15, 209-142-17 and 209-142-34 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to record same. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A Reimbursement Agreement for Frontage tmprovements was aoornveA by tho City Council on December 4, 1985 and recorded on December 18, 1985 as Document No. 85-322765 in the Office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California. The Reimbursement Agreement was for the construction of Improvements on Arrow Highway and owners of the adio~ining properties were su6~ected to reimbursement under the provisions of Section 12.08.075 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Barton Development Company, has paid the sum of ;30,202.85 for Assessor Parcel Nos. 209-142-14, 209-142-15, and 209-142-34 and Utica-Haven Associates has likewise paid the sum of ;8,499,86 for their share respectively of the reimbursement fees per City Council Resolution No. 85-328, thus obligating the City to release the lien related to said reimbursement agreement. Respectfully submitted, SG,~.~trL'Soae.PffR SB:NV:dlw Attachment 7~ RESOLUTION N0. gp.~Ov A RESOLUTION DF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING LIEN RIGHTS RELATED TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 209-142-14, 209-142-15 AND 209-142-34 FROM BARTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND FOR ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 209-142-17 FROM UTICA-HAYEN ASSOCIATES NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 85-328 accepting a Reimbursement Agreement for Frontage Improvements from Daon Corporation; and NHEREAS, said Reimbursement Agreement for Frontage Improvements was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on December 18, 1985, as Document No. 85-322765; and NHEREAS, portion of said Reimbursement Agreement for Frontage Improvements for Assessor Parcel Numbers 209-142-14, 209-142-15, 209-142-17 and 209-142-34 are no longer required. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release Tien rights related to said Reimbursement Agreement for Frontage Improvements from mentioned parcel numbers (see attached exhibits "A "B', "C` and "D') that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino Gounty, California. ~S APN 209-/¢?-/4 •/yr2-/7 (-APN 209-/¢~L5 IPO TE ------~====°~' APN209 /_¢?~ n) h~ F 2 i ~ . a.n•c, on.c xa ro.c Qtl.. ^ I4 YY - •~. ~ IYLIa 1 . i ... .... ii ... RM. /6163, t • .. c 14.! Wr2 Pv11 n.It ~i~' ~ n ® ,1 ~ C `••". r ~:` t "~` • '""' t.ac uv nn d ~ err •mr Yn e~lic = F-- ~,... I •; CU G h na ` v _..,, i ~~, 6 n ~. ~ 3 i. ~~ ~ ~ f ~0' . uc o.>.e me d ~~, I [[~~...~~ ~i- Ms 'Y ~ W/ [A}AC ~' ~ ; ,. ~ 9~.o..s.ro • i ® i , v ~ N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T1T1.F.: ~LF.4SE aP L/ENS ENGINEERIIV(} DMSION .A " ~~ 7~ - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: City :.ouncil and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: wi111e Yalbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Lawrence E. and Cheryi Perdew, for a single family residence, located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Highland Avenue, It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subJect Reat Proparty Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The developers, Lawrence E. and Cheryt Perdew, requested a building permit for a single family residence located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Highland Avenue (6376 East Arenuei. Street improvements are a condition of issuing the buitding permit. The City does not require said improve.~,~G tc ha ~!?i• at this time. Therefore, the developers have submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract anu L~~~~ Agreement for the construction of the improvements on East Avenue adiacent to their property. A copy of the Agreement is available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, s~~ ~~ Shlntu Bose Deputy City Engineer 58:NV:Jh Attachment 77 RESOLUTION N0. 90 - 7 ~~ A RESOLUTION QF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM LANRENCE E. AND CHERYL PERDEN AND AUTHORIZING THE M11Y08 AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance Ho. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements 1n conjunction with budding perwHt Issuance; and NHEREAS, installation of missing off-site street improvements ad,~acent to the property to be developed established as prerequisites to Issuance of building penmit for 6376 East Avenue has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and L1en Agreement by Lawrence E. and Cheryl Perdew. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAIN:NO CUCAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept said Real Properq~ Improvement Contract and Lt en Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record sane in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. !O /oacc~ ~ ~ ~,. ~ 8 .5 A0. i 25AL. 10 AC -- ~ 19 69 4 29AC. \I} NdP 201-J6-520 vAR 1 10 , ..... to do ~~0 ,' ..., ao ~^. ..., ~ 29 ~ ;r 2 ~ z ~' 5 i~ 2.11 AC. 41 is ~9 X31 ,$ ~~ ~..I .___ i ._ I.. 'J ', ) 60'!d0 V/I t i S6 ~'' IS pJ 1 i 10 AL. l10 40.1 F I - Q W ~,', J H/GHLANO avE,vuE r sirc- ~~ w CITY OF ~; N RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:_6376 EASrAG'E ENGINEERING DIVL9ION 7 Q EXH~gIT; _ 'A ~/ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: October 17, 1990 T0: ~ City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector I SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension four Parcvel Map 5996, located on Cabrosa Place south of Nilson Avenue, submitted by Randolph and Sandra Davis. RfCOMEMDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subiect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcei Map 5946 were approved by the City Council on August 17, 1989, in the folloming amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 574.000.00 Labor and Material Bond: f37,000.00 The developer, Randolph and Sandra Davis, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are avallab]e in the City Clerk's Dfftce. Respectfully submitted, .SGT Boaa.~ SB:SMG:Iy Attachments Steve M. Gilliland September 18, 190 Public Works Iris Rector C:OMM~!N ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. E Ni•I NEE P.I NG DIVISION CITY 6F RANCHO CUCAMONOA Suject: Expiration of Improvement Agreement for Parcei Map 559E Dear sir: Please find enclosed the Improvement Agreement Er.t erasion, the riew se ctu^ctiv extension and fee in the am a.int of $.".51.06 of for the above noted Project 59gF_~. We hereby request a si>: month extension of said agreement for the tallown ray reasons. A: Changes in the scope of the development to enh arice the total project required additional engineeriny~ plan checks, drawing c har~yes ari4 approval time before certain aspects of the project could be contracted an4 work completed. E~ C:onztruction delay=_ were encountered on certain parts of the prw ect due to extensive grading and impart of materials. Ine r'e maing wort: eo Le Map ie beu is ab iviiowb• 1• C'~ommunity trail improvements per City Std. I002.(requires dwg• revision) . Step Thru per City St4. 1067• . Local trail improvements per City Std. 1001 d. Installation of three ?ype 5800E st r~eet lights. 5. Planting of 19 trees on C:abrosa Place. n. Planting of 5 trees on Wilson Avenue. 7• Retair~iny walls per City Std. 812. 8• Installation of 4 water meters. 9• Final inspection and approval at improvements. Cordially E.o , ~ .~ P.ando ~ph S.Davis 1 ~~G7G ~~ ~QUY.d ands P.Davis RSD/sw g I RESOLUTION N0. 90-~ A RESOLUTION ~OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL M11P 5996 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 17, 1990, by Randolph and Sandra Davis as developer, for the Improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Cabrosa Place south of Wilson Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described to said Improvement Agreement and subject W the tenas thereof, 1s to be done in conjunction with the deveiopment of said Parcel Map 5996; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Secur/ty, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement. Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. C~ CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 11> 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve N. &11111and, Public Morks Inspector Iy_ SUBJECT: Approvai of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 10295, located on Elm Avenue between Spruce Avenue and Church Street, submitted by Lewis Homes. RECOMIEIQIITIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt Lhe attached resolution, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and Ctty Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 10295 were approved by the City Council on February 16, 1989, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5143,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: S 71,500.00 The developer, Lewis Haines, 1s requesting approval of a 30-day extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Cierk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~~.t Br~QZ//~/r SB:SN6;ly Attaciments Lewis Homes Management Corp. 115fi Norm Mowbm Avenue/P.Q, Soz 670/Ilplazd, Cdi[omiz 91785 734N85-0971 FAX: 714ry49-6700 September 26, 1990 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730-0807 Attn: Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector REr~!^~~r OCT 01 1990 CITY OF FPVC:'~fi I;' Ref.: Request for Extension -- Improvement Agreement PM 10295 Oear Mr. Gilliland: we were in error in our earlier letter requesting a 2a month extension to complete the terms of the referenced improvement agreement. We apologize for our error and any resulting inconvenience. We hereby request a 30 day extension in order to complete the .. ..-..-_.. -..z.~,.. ,........_ ..y ~...........-. Thank you for your consideration. Please call if you need additional information. Very truly yours, LEWIS HOM~EjS_ MANAGEMENT CORP. 1% ~ tr~w/ /K eph M. Oleson Vice President/ Senior Project Manager ,7Mi~: ksk 8~1 RESOLUTION N0. 90•~ A RESOLUTION~OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENI AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPRDYEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 10295 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an improvement Agreement Extension executed on October 17, 1990, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the Improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Elm Avenue between Spruce Avenue and Church Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n said Improvanent Agreement and sub~ecL to the terns thereof, 1s to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcel Map 10295; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and sold Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized Lo sign Bald Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 8s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 17, 1990 v City Council and City Manager v Shtntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Steve M. 611111and, Public Norks Inspector ~-1~~~ Rcceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds amend No~ttc~e of Completion for Tract 12969 located on south side of Arrow Route at Edwin Court. RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 12969 have been completed Tn an acceptable manner, and it 15 recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in Lhe amount of ;11,300.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of ;113,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 12969 -located on the south side of Arrow Route at Edwin Court DEYELOPER: Hagop and Yeg1a Yazed~lan P.0. Box 963 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) ; 11,300.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5113,000.00 Respectfully submitted, ~51~:~-Qoa~~ SB:SMG:1y Attachment 4 ~p RESOLUTION N0. 90-~ A RESOLUTION -OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMDNGq, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEIENTS FCk 1`RACT 12969 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12969 have been completed to the satisfaction a` the C1Ly Engtreer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Campletion is required to be filed, certifying tha work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the cork is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 87 /~TTV 11L. D A Till ii/1 !.T i(. A 11l/1\fl~ A STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspeetor.2T-~~_ SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Caapletlon for Tract 13270 Basin A2 iocated on the northwest corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue. RECOMMEIUATION: The required improvements for Tract 13270 Basin !2 have been completed to an acceptable manner, and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in thR amount of (48,600.00 authorize the Ctty Engineer to file a Natlce of Caapletion and authorize the Ctty Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond 1n the amount of f486,000.00. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS Tract 13270 Basin 82 - located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue DE4ELOPER: Nestern Praperttes P.0. Box 670 Upiand, CA 91786 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) = 48,600.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) ;486,000.00 Respectfully submitted, SIItNA~ ~oiQ. l~ SB:SMG:Iy Attachment 88 RESOLUTION N0. aQ -~~ A RESOLUTION~OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13270 BASIN A2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEkEAS, the construction of public Improvements for Tract 13210 Basin M2 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NIlEREAS, a Notice of Completion Ts required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Ctty Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 89 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: @Y: SUBJECT: October 17, 1990 City Council and City Manager Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector I~~ Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13823 located on the south side of Lemon Avenue between Bars ac Place and Sem111on Place , RECOMMEIMTIOM: The required street improvements for Tract 13823 have been caspleted in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept Lhe Maintenance Guarantee Bond 1n the amount of 56,300.00, authorize the City Engineer to fife a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Band in Lhe amount of 563,000.00. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS 'tract 13823 - located on the south side of Lemon Avenue between 6arsac Place and Sem111on Place. DEVELOPER: Alta Lama/D.K. Jc1nt Venture 3800 W. Alameda Avenue #800 Burbank, CA 91505 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 6,300.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 563,000.00 Respectfully submitted. SG:~~ B~aa,o~. SB:SMGay Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. GJO ~~ A RESOLUTION .OF THE CITY COUNCIL QF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEF£MTS FOR TRACT 13823 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COFPLETION FOR THE WDRK WNEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13823 have been completed to the sattsfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County F;ecorder of San Bernardino County. 9i nrmv nc n , wrn nn n STAFF REPORT GATE: October 17, 1990 Q, T0: City Council and City Manager vv FROM: Shi ntu Bose, Deputy Cl ty Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector LI~ SUBJECT: acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion far Tract 13425, located on the north side of 19th Street between Haven avenue and Highland Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13425 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 562,300.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the anpunt of 5623,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13425 - located on the north side of 19th Street between Haven Avenue and H1ahlanA Avanoe. DEVELOPER: Glenfed Development 16601 Ventura Bivd. A200 Encfno, CA 91436 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 62,300.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5623,000.00 Respectfu'.ly sutmltted, ~5/,~.t,~ Q~~~ SB:SMG:Iy Attachment 9a- RESOLUTION NO• LJD-~~ A RESOLUTION ~OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONfiA, CIILIFgiNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13425 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of pu611c improverients for Tract 13425 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongga hereby resolves, that the vrork is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 93 ~rmv nc o w unvn n.rn . vnvn . STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 ~'~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shlntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve M. G11111and, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 13058 located on the west side of Fairmont May south of Hlghlan6 Avenue RECOMMEIOATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council author'ze the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance period bas ended and the street improvements remain free fro defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: M1111am Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue SutU! B Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f75,000.p) Respectfully submitted, .Sd:M.tu .6~¢~ SB:SMG:Iy 9~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA STAFF REPORT OAiE: October 17, 1990 (Z T0: City Council and City Manager LJ FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy C1ty Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Supv. Public Norks Inspector~lCEQ SUBJECT: Accept the Highland Avenue Improvement Protect, from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue, Contract No. 90-073, as complete, release bonds and authorize the Deputy City Engineer to f11e a "Notice of Completion". RECOMMEMDATION: It 1s recomaended that the C1ty Council accept the Highland Avenue Improvement Protect, Prom Nervosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue, Contract No. 90-073, as complete, authorize the Deputy C1ty Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion , retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f119,226.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond and authorize the Maters alsf Bo d rl nen then amount ~f uf119f226.W 1.135a days eafterr the recordation of said notice if no cialms have been received. Also, approve the f1na1 contract amount of 629,223.60. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subtect protect has been completed 1n accordance with the approved plans and specifications and t0 the satisfaction of the Deputy City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on protect documentation, 1s 5129,223.60 which Includes 1 contract change order for special street closure signs. RespectfulJJly submitted, SB:PDLad ~/~~ cc: Purchasing 9s /~ l~DO4 RESOLUTION N0. "70~~ A RESOLUTION .OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE HIGHLAND AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO MAYBERRY AVENUE, CONTRACT N0. 90-073, AND AUTHORIZ?NG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the ccnstruction of public Improvements for the Highland Avenue Improvement Protect, from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue, Contract No. 90-073, have been completed to the satisfaction of the Oeputy City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion 1s required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the Deputy City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 9~ ORDINANCE N0. 431 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORN iA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENUME NT N0. 90-03 TO AOJ UST THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF SUBAREA 8 ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE NOP,THE RLY 330 FEET, WESTERLY 1,065 FEET, AND SOUTHERLY 330 FEET TO ITS PRESENT BOUNDARY WITH SUBAREA 7; DELETION OF THE PLANNED EX TENS [ON OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN ROCHESTER ANU INILLIKEN RVENUES; AND THE REALIGNMENT OF A PORTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD EAST Of ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga ilas filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-03 (ISPA 90-03) as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On September 12, 1990, the Planning Commission of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment. Fallowing the conclusion of said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-116, thereby recommendi r.g that the City Council adopt Ind usiria', Area Specific Plan Amendment Nn. 90-03. (iii) On October 3, 1990, Lhe Citv Co unr.il of the Citv of Ranc hn Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior Lo its adoption of this Ordinance. (iv) All lenzi prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: SECTION 1: This :n unc it hereby sped fies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Thic fpiin ril hereby fjndg and C_rt' H es that the praj oct has been re vl ewed and ~;onsidered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council ur ng t e above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in sections 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows; 97 Ordinance No. 431 Page 2 (a) The application relating to the Subarea 8 boundary adjustment applies to approximately 8 acres of land, oa si caliy a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet north of Arrow Highway and is presently undeveloped with existing vi ney 3rds. Said property is currently designated as Subarea 7; and (b) The property to the north, east, and west of the subarea adjus~:ment is designated Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 7 and is undeveloped with existing vineyards. The property to the south is desiona tad indusi.riai Area Specific Plan Subarea 8 and is undeveloped with existing vineyz rds. (c) The application relating to the deletion of the Day Creek Boulevard extension applies to approximately .13 miles of planned roadway betweei Rochester and Milliken Avenues; and the realignment of Day Creek Bo ulev3rd applies to approximately .25 miles on the east side of Rochester Avenue, (d) This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within r,he district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (e) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitt'd in the proposed district in terms of access and size, as evidenced by the `findings and conclusions of the Initial Study traffic analysis; and (f) That the proposed Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions, findings, and miti a_ati nn moa<nroc ~r +tio ~~+li ~l rr :•i rc ra--a, Study; aid (g) That the proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General lion and Industrial Area Specific Plan due to the site's capacity to promote :he goals and objectives for development of a park in the location proposed in each document. iECTIDN 4: Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in sections ~1, 2, and 3 above, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Rmendment No. 90-03 to change the su6a rea be and ari es and circulation system as follows: (a) Adjust the northern boundary of Subarea 8 on the west aide of Rochester Avenue northerly 330 feet, westerly 1,065 feet and southerly 330 feet to itc pra<cnr hnundary with Subarea "; gad (6) Delete the planned extension of Day Creek Boulevard between Rochester and Milliken Avenues; and 98 Ordinance No. 431 Page 3 (c) Realign the portion of Day Creek Boulevard, east of Rochester Avenue, mid-way between its planned location and Arrow Highway. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City C1 erk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the :'nland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 99 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT _ MEMORANDUM - 1 DATE: October 16, 1990 y ;sa 7U Mayor and Members of the City Council s FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief BY: Lloyd B, Almand, Division Chief/Fire Marshal I SUBJECT: Findings of Fact (or Residential Automatic Fire Sprinkler ~~ Ordinance: , 1. BF9N: Staff recommends approval of the Resolution detailing the findings of tact it support of the Ordinancn requiring the installation of automatic fit: sprinklers in single family and multi-family dwellings, as recommended b; the Poblic Safety Commission at their June 12, 1990 meding, li. BACKGROUND: The Slate of California, through its Health and Safely Code, mandates that Findings of Fact be adopted whenever a city or cot my makes changes or modifications in the requirements contained in the provisions published in the State Building S!andards Codc (i.c. Uniform Building Code) that are cunstaerea to ce reasonaoty necessary Dccause of local cltmauc, geologmal or topographical conditions. Although the law states that only one of the three aferementioncd conditions needs to exist when filing the Findings of Fact, we have presented evidence on all three of the areas in an effort to substantiate more clearly and definitively the problems that czist within the City and which eme•gency personnel have been and can he ennfronted with. Also, we have added a new dimension to the findings in that we have included graphic illustrations of what we have detailed in writing in an effort to add clarity and proof to our Findings of Fact. R spcctfully submit~tled, n~.a(~-i d'i~i ~r r~~ti n Dennis Michael Fire Chic( LDhi/js ~~ 0 r J Q C G Z Q H 2 0 LL J a , LL ul Q 'j LL ' oy o,~ ~'b ~ ~ ~bS c ~ ~ . ~- a LL 2 N _~ U U CA a N O H z c Z ~ . :~ ' ~' ' ~ u PJ~, PJv ~. F q~ J ~ • qPP \C1 ] 'd Fed G~ LL r F U N O ~ a ~ 2 ^~! N ~ 1 1 J 1 ., Q ,. 1 LL ~' 1 J ~ h Jv 4 5 4P 'c o Q _ ~~ d/ ~ EXF~IIi81T A-1 Original Pcor Quality EARTHQUAKE ESCARPMENT IN NORTH ETIWANDA AREA IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THIS "MOVING" FAULT LINE MC AR r rIIS ESCARPMENT RUNS LATERALLY BELOW THE "BOG" IN NORTH ETIWANDA ANU THROUGH THE PLATEAU THAT ONCE WAS THE SITE OF THE U.S. FORESTRY FIRE STATIOtJ /f~- EXHIBIT B 0 ~: ~o 0 t^ .O C ~, r- FLOODING ON HERMOSA AVENUE AT CHURCH STREET - 1990 la3 FLOODING ON 4TH STREET AT I-15 - 1990 W a ~ _ ~ z f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z LL H ii a ~ H W ~ a I ~ ~ ~ U ~ i , ~ ! '3nr 15r3 vii = ~; ° ='I - , n m I ~ '~nr VaM'RI L~ I i i j QI WI 4 M 1 ~ _ i ', ?nr a~!s3coa ~~~ o; s j I I i ~' 3 I . ~ ' nr NSA ilW ' ~ i I i i_.... ......_... _ ..... ' ...._ . ...._ ..._........ - .... .... .......... ...... I ~ /~ ~./ J j II 1 ~ i~ I 1 ~~I I °c ~ '3nV N3nrH ~ ' i, ~~ r - F ~ ~I W W ~ ''1' I ~ W I I ~I ~_' ~I ~ 5 m ~, mi p Ni _1 W m ~ ]. Jl N pj w ~I .I ~ ~ I I ,n ~ r mrmN~ar i I ~ ~nr 15~~1'+WV I I Nr W'1'i_N S '. I I ~ 1 i ~0~ EXHIBIT D ~ariginal_ Poor, Quality ~O$ BRUSHLAND IN NORTH ETIWANDA AREA TEXAS FIRE AS IT CROSSED SUMMIT AVENUE AT EAST AVENUE SCHOOL EXHIBIT ~ ~I^, ~' Q ~'.Ii' IF~'~, ,~~~ ;~, ~ ~ ,~ ,, , ~o ~'~I ~~R`i ~1 L, t. ~a W z J W <n m z O z 0 0 z O a m vz W J a w C7 a 0 x z 0 ,~ 0 w ~~.. ~~ C ~ OHO THICK VEGETATION GROWTH IN AREA NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE TEXAS FIRE BEFORE IT CAME OUT OF CANYON BOWL AND RAN THROUGH ETIWANDA ~~ 7 EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION N0. 90-352 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANf,H0 CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS ANp DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY'S BUILDING CODE, AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE ND. 426 ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY BECAUSE Of LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS A. Recitals. (i) California Health and Safety Code Section 17922 requires all cities to adopt, as the City Building Standards Code, the State Building Standards Code adopted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 4 of Part 2.5 of Di vi Sion 13 of the California Health and Safety Code. (ii) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 50022.2, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted by reference, the "Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition". (iii) Section 17958.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provides, in pertinent part, as follows: ...a city or county may make such changes or modifica- tions in the requirements contained in the pr visions published in the State Building Standards Code and the other regulations adopted pursuant to Section 11922 as it determines, pursuant to the orovi si ons of Sec ti nn 1/958.7, are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or tcpo gra phical conditions." (iv) Prior to making the modifications permitted under Section 17958.5 of the California Health and Safety Gode, this Council is required to make an express finding that such modifications or changes are needed in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7. (v) This Council de sf res to amend the provisions of Section 3802 of the "Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition". (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows; 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution, ~~O Resolution No. 90-352 Page 2 2. This council does hereby expressly find and determine that the amendments set forth in Ordinance No. 426, amending Section 3802 of the "Uniform Building Cade, 1988 'edition" are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological and topographical conditions. This express finding is supported and based upon the following more specific findings and determf nations: A. Geological: A unique geological condition exists within the City of Ra rrc ho Cucamonga in that five earthquake faults are present, which create the potential for severe damage and fire hazards. There is potential also for damage to road- ways and impairment of access for fire equipment to respond to emergencies in the event of a severe earthquake. Since January 1, 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga area has been jolted by at least 28 earthquakes and after shocks, ranging from 3.1 to 5.5 on the Richter Scale. (See Exhibit "A" and "A-1") 2. Adverse geological conditions exist throughout a substan- tial part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that give rise to excessive flooding. Flood control facilities are not adequate to handle the water flow that occurs during major rains. Some of the streets in the City are actually designed and used for flood ca ntrol purposes, thus making fire and emergency access difficult during flood condi- tions. Recording to the City's Engineering Department, using Base Line Road as the median east-west street, during a normal rain season, the following streets are designed to carry the runoff as indicated: (a) Carnelian Street: 1,100 cubic fee per second, or 8,299 gallons per second, and (b) Hellman Avenue: 1,700 cubic feet per second or 12,717 gallons per second, and (c) Hermosa Avenue: 2,700 cubic feet per second or 20,198 gallons per second. as a tonseguence, merry ^f the ~traets within the Citv aFe impaired during such flood conditions and such flooding causes physical damage to the streets and the accumulation of debris, all of which hinder the access of ffre equipment to respond to fire emergencies. (See Exhibit "B") !~9 Resolution No. 90-352 Page 3 Access of fire equipment responding to calls is often hampered by the adverse climatic and geological conditions within the City, because all of the City's fire stations are in the northerly portion of the City. The northern area of the District is often the most damaged and impaired by the adverse climatic and geological conditions, thereby limiting access of emergency vehicles responding to calls within their own "first-in" district. (See Exhibit "C") n. Topographical: The topography of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is generally that of a gently sloping inclined plane which projects from the base of the San Bernardino Mountains, at an eleva Lion in excess of 2,400 feet above sea level, in a southerly direction where the el ova ti an is approximately 1,400 feet lower. Natural slopes of 8 percent or greater generally occur in the northern third of the City. In many cases, slopes in the foothills exceed 40 percent. There are two locations where steeper topography occurs in the souther portion of the City. These two locations are the Red hill area and the area directly east of Red hill Park. The elevation changes caused by the mountains and hills creates the geological foundation on which the CTty is built and will continue to 6utid. Nith much of the flatlands either already built upon or dedicated for approved projects, it can be anticipated that upon future growth will occur on steeper stapes and greater contrasts in terrain. All of these topographical conditions have created slower response Limes of emergency vehicles into the high growth areas. due to the ext raordinarv uphill slope of the land. C. Climate: 1. Extreme high winds, commonly referred to as Santa Ana winds, are generated from the desert and reach the basin through Devore Pass and first contact highly-developed areas within City boundaries at velocities, sometimes in excess of 80 mph. Extensive damage often occurs during such winds, including dawned electric wires, downed poles, fallen trees, blowing sand and dust. In recent years, beginning in late 1987, the City has incurred Santa Rna winds ranging in velocity from 80 to 83 mnh, Qn Dnrwmb>p 72 tOB]~ app.•o xi.T.d te1„ an cdi .On power poles along Rase Line Road gore snapped in half and blown down by the high winds. Those downed poles totally pre- vented the use of Base line Road for emergency vehicles. Alternate emergency routes had to be utilized for the next three days. The use of those alternate routes caused decays in what would have been normal and routine emergency responses. // o Resolution No. 90-352 Page 4 On January 22, 1988, winds again caused severe response problems. Nigh voltage electrical wires were blown down at numerous locations throughout the City. Emergency apparatus were tied up at those locations pending the arrival of Edison electrical crews, which in some cases exceeded one hour. 4. On February 16, 1988, winds again hit the City extremely hard. This particular time the high winds generated such a aeve re bi owing sand and dust problem that the emergency units responding to a structure fire east of Haven Avenue were stopped in their tracks, due to no visibility. That incident not only stopped the emergency response, but also resulted in significant fire vehicle damage. These adverse conditions result in: (a) Fires (See Exhibit "D") (b) Impairment of fire equipment access (See Exhibit "E") (c) Delays in responses of fire equipment; and (d) Fire personnel and equipment committed to non-fire emergencies. Heather conditions, coupled with flammable vegetation in the City results in numerous wil Bland fires, which draw e xi sti n9 fire fi gh *_ing forces from their structure protection duties for extended periods of time. This results in extended response times to structure fires when such personnel and equipment are committed to non- structural protection. (See Exhibit "F") 3. The City Clerk shall, and hereby is directed to, forthwith upon the adoption of this Resolution, file a certified copy of this Resolution, together with certified copies of Ordinance No. 426, with the California Department of Housing and Community Development as required by Section 11958.7 of the California Health and Safety Code. 4. The Cfty Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ~I~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCnMONGA ~~icnnto lc STAFF REPORT `~ '' e ~ n ri r O',; > L O I $ 2 DATE: October 10, 1990 -~ ~i' > 19n T0: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJE CT: RESIDENT 111E FIRE SPRINKLERS I. RECOMMENDATION: it is recoumlended by the Public Safety Commission that the City Council review the accompanying ordinance and, if found to be consistent with direction given by the Council for, its' preparation, that the City Council conduct a Du blic hearing and hold first reading of the Ordinance. II. BACKGROUND: On Rpril 18, 1990, the City Council directed staff to prepare a residential fire sprinkler ordinance and requested the Public Safety Commission to hold hearings on the matter and make rerommendations to the City Council in Lhat regard. The Public Safety Commission held public hearings on of June 5, and June 12, took testimony from industry and staff members, made modifications to certain staff recorcnendations and referred the in farinaLiar, back to the City Council with a recommendation for adoption. IiI. ANRL YS I S : Current building reaula tions re aui re an au tnmatic sprinkler _ _ system in multiple residential buildings exceeding two stories in height or incorporating more Lhan 15 dwelling units. The proposed ordinance amends and supplements the existing building codes currently in effect, adding two new standards (based upon National Fire Protection Association Standards 13D and 13R) to the current Uniform Building Code Standards and amending the current Uniform Building Code requiring sprinklers in all other new residential buildings and certain accessory buildings in close proximity thereto. The accompanying draft adopts, by reference, the Lwo nationally recognized standards outlined above. The locations identified by asterisks in Lhe accompanying standards are those where changes or additions have been proposed to adapt the published documents to the codes or the Public Safety Commission's conclusions. Wording proposed for eor Yinne en iderfiFi nA ter ho f~~rd :n thn F.~Ay ~r the erA'^enC^. The significant technical changes to the published standards are: One and Two Family Dwellings a. Alarm bell(s), alerting occupants and surrounding properties arc required on all systems, deleting the exception for substitution of smoke detectors fn their place. STAFF REPORT: RESIBENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLERS Septerber 5, 1990 Page 2 b. The standards and huilding code have been modified to require fire sprinklers in garages and carports attached to or within 10 feet of a residential building cn the same property or within five feet of a property line. c. A fire department connection (a stand pipe to allow the fire department to increase pressure in the system) is required for buildings over 5000 square feet in area. Multiple family dwellings less than three-stories in height or comprised of 15 units or less a. Connection of the alarm system to a central station (constantly manned monitoring agency) is required. b. The standard has been revised to require sprinkiers in pent-house equipment rooms, crawl spaces, floor and ceiling spaces, elevator shafts, etc., but allowing omission of sprinklers in attics not utilized for living or storage. It is contemplated that administration and enforcement of the regulations will be the responsibility of the Building and Safety Division with cooperation and assistance from the Fire District. This is due, in part, Lo a recent Attorney General opinion questioning authority of fire districts to enact building reguia tions. Further, because the proposal is directly related to construction rather than maintenance of 6u Sl di ngs, the City Attorney has recommended that the proposed ordinance become a part of the Cf ty's building regulations. Financial support for enforcement will be derived from fees charged for plan checking and permits, with secondary supplement from the Fire District. As requested, Public Safety Commission documentation is being suhmitted under separate cover. IV. SUMMARY: The accompanying ordinance represents the combined efforts of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Building and Safety Division in conjunction with direction from the Public Safety Commission to meet the needs of the city and respond Lo the City Council's direction. The results of that effort are submitted herewith for your review and consideration. Res oectfully Sublllltted. //~ _ y~ J ry R. Grant of ~v~ ~~ / 6~~~ Building Official JRG/kes /13 Rancho Cucamonga ~-=~ _~ CHAMBER OF GOMMERCE odober u,1990 The Rancho Cucaunnga Chamlxr of Commerce thanW the City d RarrcM Cucamonga for Contlnumg this item and providing the Chamber' of Commerce with the time to review the proposed residentiil sprinkler onlinance. During the past several weeks, the Roonomic Development Committee of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Conmterce has concluded a series of work sessions ro review tlrc proposed residential fire sprinkler' oMinanre. The partldpant ~ those work seseiau included aftldals of the RNrclro Cumrtronga Fire District, Gty of Random Cucmnnga Building and $atety Department offldala, Chamber of Commerce members including: resdenilel builders, developer, broken, building aseodatbn representtlvea, fire sprinkler tedmidans and reprexnttlves of detection and akrtlng syseems manufachrrers. A greet deal of dare including facts, ntporb and d®toratra- Aon was shared and dixuwed by all partlcipsnb. We applaud the effort, partldptbn and coopaatlon of the Fire DLstrid and the City in these work seadau. As a result of these work sessiara, fhe Chamber d Comereae would tlke b share the fotlowing thought an the 'letter' and the "spirit' of the proposed ordlmrae. It is the opin{on of the Ranch Cucanwnga Chamber of Cmrmerce tlut tM getter' of the proposed ardirunm stxndd apeciAcaAy and directly irrdude aft of the text of the ordhurce. Ae propeeed, the ordh~ance includes ne(erentt to other document and stardaNa such as NFPA 13D and NFPA 13R Direct irtduston. rsMrc tlwn ..,.w.o~.a. "Y .n~vaae, of uux smnaaros anouM serve kr reduce mnfusian and cordlict that could arlx during implemavaflon of any ordinerrae. Ir considering the "spirit" of the proposed ordinance, the isnres of effedlve life safely and the soctl and em nomic impact were mnaidered, While sprinkler are an imporbnt omtponent of fire amtrd, the lame of life safety goa+heyond Area ilore. In- fomatlonreviewed during the Chambers work sedan would appear W indlcak that hk wkly should also include smoke and heat detectlon, security end medkal heilth issues. For fht reason it b urged that the Gty Coundl broaden ire public wfdY perspective b irrlude ilterntlve forva of dekctlon, alermtg.rd cnmWtlng items and systems in an overall public safety policy whkh can be implemented on a CYty•wde basis. Afkr all, an onlirwue (err new mrutrudbn only wW result in kss than orr~hilf of the dty'a resWenb bring proeected through fire aprinkias wNh tla edstlng home left urufkctsd by this ordirana. The queetlon moat be naked, b tide type of public safely posture egdtbk for all the nsddetb of Randq Cuomiwrgp, both dment and (utureJ Additionsy, _~ ~~x of apprc^t,. iaS i.-ipler.:ni:ika. weed on geogapbic and envimnutarW canditkxb must be fully considered with regards to higher rink crew (ie: above wgtdend Avenue) versus krwa rick arse. When oonedered t the r~lm of the lost emnotrry coupled with the City~a desire fo progress with a jobs/ ldudng ba4na, the Rancho Cucavwnga Chamber of Covunerce reels that - rn Ira current Bxm - the propoxd ondirance should not be approved. ~~~ 8260 UTICA AVENUE, SUITE 160 • RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA 91730 • 714 / 987-1012 Rancho Cucamonga ~=' -~~ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AS the process of growth continues iar fhb City, the importance of emromic growth and development of flat community will contWre m irr¢eeae..4s sudr, the actlvitlta of tlds dtyatd the reputetlorr d this City based upon theses actiau-will have a direct acrd long taro impact ar Ranch Cuosmonga's ecatomic growtlr. An ordinance flat is not sensitlve to it's own ecartontic Wpct w15 tend b have a ra!gatlve Wpad on the City~s efforts to develop and promote it's reputatlan and Wage. It can M said flat one of the mutual goals of the Chambe of Camnrece aM the dry is the po®tlve growth of the emnomy and the busirrea community w{thin thin city Catxquenyy, a podticm of wrtdaEOry aM single.. hcekd pudic safety oramarcm are potentia5y damaging to the emrrovric growth of the city. Yet, a respawble, multl-faceted, comprchansive and dry-wide pubtlc safety Program will further iDtntrate a comnro[r sense approach by "the City with t Vleion'. In aumnary, Ste Rancho Cucsermga Chamber of Conrnrece is opposed to the canrept of a vardatory redder- tialfiresprinkle orditratrce as currentty proposed. Haweve, the (7ramber world Ske to support the (ylys effort N developing its pudic safety program in a mndt vwre complete farvataf a baWrce betweet pubik/li(e safely and emrtomic feasrbillty, and there(ore, the Chamber rtqu~b the dental and further research by the Ciry in the area of dry-w+de publk mfety. On behal(of the memberaldp of the Rancho curanrmtp Chambv of Commerce we offer ra,r mrwr..rr... a.,.r parriapanon m nnry aeveopmg tw public safety mncePt,any necessary onatnarraea, tlrelr ^ktlc^+rra "wtrl!^. Reapectfullr, Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 8280 UTICA AVENUE SUITE 180 • RANCHO CUCAMONGq CALIFORNIA 91730 • 71~ / 957-1012 ORDINANCE N0. 426 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF TITLE 15, BUIL OIN GS AND CON STRUf.T[ON, OF THE RANCHO CU CAMON GA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE STANDARDS NFPA 13D AND NFPA 13R, BOTH PU8I.ISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPAN- CIES AND CERTAIN BUILDINGS Ar,C ESSORY THERETO, WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS AND ERCEPTIONS TO SAID CODES A. Recitals. (i) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code authorizes adoption by reference of National Fire Protection As sociatian Standards NFPq 13D, 1989 edition, and NFPA 13 R, 1989 edition, each as published by the National Fire Protection Association. (ii) At least one copy of each of said Standards, certified as a full, true and correct copy thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50022.5. (iii) A duly noticed public hearing as required by the Government Code Section 50022.3. has heen rnndnr tad and rnnrl ndod ~ ,,,. .~ •~.e .d,.~.: ,_.., of this Ordinance. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ (iv) All legal ore requisi tes to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: In ail respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code entitled "fl nil dinn5 and rn net raa l: ar^ ~f the DitY Da CiiCii of the Dlttl of Rd iii. iii, Cucamonga is hereby amended, provided that said amendment shall not apply to or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, and pr•o vided further that the Uniform Codes adopted and amended by Ordinance No. 412 of this City shall continue to he applicable to construction far which permits have been issued prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 3: Chapter 15.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Section 15.12.166 and 15.12.168 to read as follows: ~~ Ordinance No. 426 Page 2 1512.166 Section 3802 (h) Amended - Group R, Division 1 Occu ancies. Section 3802 h of said Uniform Building Code is amen ed to read as follows: Section 3802{h) Group R, Civision 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 1 Occupancy as follows: In every apartment house three or more stories in height or containing more than IS dwelling units, and every hotel three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms, the system is to he installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1, "Design Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems," exte pt that residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall he used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. The water flow alarm for such systems shall be monitored by an approved central station. 2. in ail new Group R, Division 1 Occupancies, other than those specified in subsection (h) 1. above, the system shall be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less than Three Stories in Height." 15.12.168 Subsections 3802 (i) and (j) added - Group R Di ViSi en 3 and Gronp M, D1Vi:19.^. 1. DCCepanCl eS. Section 3802(1) Group R, Division 3, Occupancies. An automatic fire sprinklino svstem shall 6e installed in all new Group R, Division 3 Occupancies. System design and installation shall be conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses." (j) Group M, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic fire sprinkl- ing system shall be installed in all new Group M, Division 1 Occupancies constructed within ten feet (10') of a residential occupancy. E %CEPTION: Group M, Division 1 Occupancies exempt from permit requirements by Section 301(b) 1 of Lhe Uniform Administrative Code, as adopted. priya to gars gc5 and/nr rarpnrtc attar haA to nr arraSSnry to residential buildings may be supplied from the system ser vi n9 the primary use, however, piping and installation within the accessory portions shall be in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1. r/~ Ordinance No. 426 Page 3 SECTION 4: Chapter 15.14 is hereby added to Title 15 of the Cucamonga Municipal Code, adopted by Ordinance 412, of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to read in words and figures as follows: CHAPTER 15.14 Uniform Building Code Standards Sections: 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope 15.14.030 Section 2-1.3 Amended - Inspec tidn :nd Testing 15.14.040 Section 2-4.2 Amended - Fir^- Department Connections 15.14.050 Section 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers 15.14.070 Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 Added - Adoption of NFPA 130 Standard by Reference 15.14.060 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope 15.14.090 Section i-5.1.2 Amended - Listed and Approved 15,14.100 Section 1-5.1.4 Amended - Testing and Inspection 15.14.110 Section 3-1.1 Amended Valves and Drains 15.14.120 Section 3-6 Amended - Alarms 15.14.130 Section 3-7 Added - Fi re Department Connection 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers SBCL{pn 15.14.010 Drti firm Ruildi nc reHa SSa ndarA 2n_z lAdeA nno non or of rn IsM Standard o Neference. The Uniform Building Code Stan ards, ado pte by r nance No. 4 o t e City pf Rancho cucamon ga, is hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 13R Standard. 1989 Editinr.. nu hlichod nv the National Fire Protection Association, Inc. Said NFPA 13R Standard shall be referenced as Uniform Building Code Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less Than Three Stories in Height" and shall be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems required by Section 3802(h) 2. of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by this ordinance, except as further amended by Sections 15.14.020 through 15.14.060 following. Section 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope. Section 1-1 of said Uniform huilding- Cie Standard 38-3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1.1 Scope. This standard shall oe used in design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in residential occupancies less than Lhree stories in height, not withstanding any conflicting story-height referenced herein. ~~Q Ordinance No. 426 Page 4 Section 15.14.030 Sec tior, 2-1.3 Amended - Ins ec tion and Testin . Section 2 3 of said Uniform Bui ing ~o a Sta odor 38-3 is hereby amen a to read as follows: Section 2-1.3 (a) Ins pec tf on and Testing. All supply piping shall he hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. All systems shall be flow tested in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Standards. (oj lns pection shall be requested by the permi ttee at stages of construction as outlined below: 1. When underground piping is complete but prior to conceal- ment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to Lhe overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for inspection. 2. When all overhead piping, fittings and riser are installed but prior to concealment of any portion thereof. Hydro- static test gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. 3. When pT pi ng has been concealed and all sprinkler heads, alarm bell(s) flow and tamper valves and monitoring devices installed and; or connected. Testing of associated devices, ie. alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring systems Ts to be conducted at this time. ~-Y.c rvnc nu=u n r= ue ar une nc wnnec- tTon. At least one, one and one-ha f inc /2' or one, two and one-ha f ~1 /2") fire department connec tien shall be provided when the sprinkler system has twenty (20) sprinklers or more. Fire de par tmert connections shall be located in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga fire Protection District standards. Section 1514.050 Section 2-4.6 Rmended - Alarms. Section 2-4.6 of said Uniform Bu ng Code Standard is ereby amende to read as follows: Section 2-4.6 Alarms. All water flow alarms shall be monitored by an approved central station in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Srr.H nn 15:14.060 Sec ti oe 2_B eTenned _ Loca ticn cf Sprinklers. Section z-b of said Uniform Buil df ng Code Stands 3 38-3 is hereby amen a as follows: Section 2-6 Loca tT on of Sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed in all areas. ll9 Ordinance No. 426 Page 5 EXCEPTIONS: Sprinklers may be omitted from fifty-five square feet (55 sq combustible plumbing fixt ores. bathrooms not exceeding ft.) in area with non- Sprinklers may be omitted from small clothes closets where the least horizontal dimension does not exceed three feet (3ft.) and the floor area does not exceed twenty-four square feet (24 sq.ft.) and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with material of Class I flame- spread classification, as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. 3. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. on o ca na eras aeo ptea ny urdina nce No. 412 of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 130 Standard, 2989 Edition pu 6lished 6y the National Fire Protection Association, Inc. Said NFPA 13D Standard shall be referenced as Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4, "Installation of automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses," and shall be utilized in design and ins talla±io^. of automztic ,'ire sprinkler systems required by Section 3802 (i) and (j) of the Uniform Building Code as adopted 6y this urdi nance, except as further amended by Sections 15.14.080 through 15.14.140 following. Section 15.14.080 Section 1.1 Amended - Sco oe. Section 1.1 of said Uniform Bu it ing~ Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1.1 Scope. This standard shall be used in the design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in dwellings and lodging houses and in certain accessory buildings, not withstanding any references herein to mo bil homes. Section 15.14.090 Section 1-5.1.2 Amended - Listed and A roved Devices. Section 1-5.1.2 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 38- is hereby amended to read as fnl lows: Section 1-5.1.2. Listed and approved devices. Only listed or aooro ved Aevi roc and mg}cri ale shall be ,,, cd ir. ""fora tic fire sprinki er systems. /~U Ordinance No. 426 Page 6 EXCEPTION: Listing may be waived for tanks, pumps and for support devices as permitted by Section 3-4.1. Use of unlisted devices shall be approved by the Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire Chief. Section 15.14.100 Section 1-5.1.4 Amended - Testin and Ins ac- tion. Section 1-5. ,4 of said Uniform Buildi ny Code Standard 38- is he rehy amended to read as follows: Section i-5.4.(a) lns pee ti on and Testing. All systems shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard, All systems shall be flow-tested in accordance with Rancho f.ucamon ga Fire Protection District standards. (b) Inspections shall be requested by the permi ttee at stages of construction as outlined below: 1. When underground piping is complete but prior to conceal- ment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for inspection. 2. When all overhead piping, fittings and riser are ins tailed but prior to concealment of any portion thereof. Hydro- static test gauge{s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. 3. When pi pi nq has been concealed a~w an ~.+,.~~... ..,, ~. alarm bell(s), flow and tamper valves sand monitoring devices installed and/or connected. Testing of associated devices, ie. alarms, flow and `amper valves and monitoring systems is to be conducted at this time. Section 15.14.110 Section 3-1.1 Amended - Valves and Orains. Section 3- 1T of said Uniform Building ode Sta ndar 3 - is hereby amen a to read as follows: Section 3-1.1 Valves and Drains. Each System sha 11 have a single control valve arranged to shut off both the domestic and sprinkler systems, and a separate shut-off for the domestic system only. EXCEPTIONS: The sprinkler system piping may have a separate control valve where supervised by one of the following methods: ~`~ Ordinance No. 426 Page 7 a. Cent rai station, proprietary or remote station alarm system. b. Local alarm service that will cause the sounding of an audible signal at a constantly attended point. 2. A separate shut-off valve is not required for the domestic water supply in multipurpose piping systems. Section 15.14.120 Section 3-6 Amended - Alarms. Section 3-6 of said Uniform Buil ing Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 3-6 Alarms. Local water fl ow alarm(s) shall be provided on all systems. The wa terfl ow alarm or alarms shall be located on (an) exterior wall(s), or such other location(s) as approved by the Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire Chief, and so located as to be audible throughout the building. Section 15.14.130 Section 3-7 Added - Fire De ar tment Cennec ticn. Chapter 3 of said Uniform Bui ing Code Standard 38- is hereby amended by addition of Sections-7 to read as follows: Section 3-7 Fire Department Connection. A71 R-3 occupancies exceed- ing 5000 sq.ft. in floor area shall be provided with an approved fire department connection installed i.^. accordance with Ranc ha Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Section 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amended - Laca tinn w c~.+w~~_.- Sectier -f ,~ oi~ un~ru rm uuiiaing Code Standard 38- s ere y amen a to read as follows: Section 4-6 Location of Sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed in all areas. E%v EP TI ON S: Sprinklers may be omitted from bathrooms not exceeding fifty-five square feet (55 sq.ft.) in floor area with non- combustible plumbing fixtures. 2. Sprinklers may be omitted from small closets where the least horizontal dimension does not exceed three feet (3 ft.) and the floor area does not exceed twenty-four io ua re feet (24 sy.fi.) and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with materials of Class I flame spread classification as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. /~~ Ordinance No. 426 Page 8 Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. SGri nklers may be omitted from entrance foyers that are not the only means of egress, SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause tFie same to be published within fifteen (15) dais after its passage at least once in the Inland Yalle Oail Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in t e City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF R.EPOItT GATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 17, 1990 City Councll and City Manager Shintu Bose, Oeputy City Engtneer Naiter C. Stickney, Associate Civic Engtneer Designation of Mat Street as a private street and ezempt'.ng the abutting Druperties fray requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code RECBMIEMDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Councll forward this application to the Public Safety Coamisston for review and directives to Drotect the health, safety or welfare of those persons and properties adJacent to, and in the vicinity of, such street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Protects which are adjacent to streets that have not previously been determined by the City as private are required to dedicate any needed right-of-way for the construction of public improvements and, uniess exempt due to Dro~ect size or type, are required to construct needed ~„ .~~«~~_„q_wav. These requlresents have improvements rnchin iiicna v~-. •: , become the focal point of obiections by owners of property on ~mCa. residential streets, Darticularly in the Alta Coma section of the City, as they developed their property. Their contention was that, because these streets were unique in nature and are of substandard design and construction, that the improvement of the street would have a negative effect on the abutting Droperty and the streets should remain private. Because of these concerns, on Juty 5, 1989, the City Councll adopted an Ordinance which established a mechanism for the review and determination of whether a street could be designated as a Private Resident/ai Street. This would thereby exempt the abutting properties to these streets from the requirements set forth in the Municipal Lade for the dedication of public right-of-way and the construction of public improvements. TMs action regarding Mai Street was triggered by a property owner «Ke, when applying for a 6ui1d1ng permit, was informed that an irrevocable offer to dedicate was required prior to the issuance of a building permit. The owner contended that Mai Street which his property abuts, was private and that the offer to dedicate requirement would not CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MAI STREET OCTOBER 3, 1990 PAGE 2 pertain. The Droperty owner was given an option of filing an application to the City Clerk's office per Ordinance No. 56-C for the review and determination if the street is private and eventually setting up a public hearing date for the City Council review. The owner subsequently submitted a petition of 4 owners of property abutting Mai Street (100f of the total parcels affected.) The petition requests that the City Ccuncil stake a determination. The referenced sub3ect has been sent to the Fire District for review and comsert. The main concerns of the Fire District are 26 feet wt de emergency fire access, street capability to handle 70,000 lbs, of emergency equipment and barrier protection for existing fire hydrants. Based upon our review and analysis of comments obtained from the Fire 0l strict and the Public Works Subcomaittee, public safety has been the main concern. It is therefore our recaw~endation W forward this application to the Public Safety Cowaisston for review and directives to protect the health, safety or welfare of those Dersons and properties adiacerit to, and in the vicinity of such street. Respectfully submitted, Sly ,~~ SB:NCS:dIw Attachment ~d C 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIQEERBdG DIVI9IOid N ~; MA/ 5T. ~~: ~~ ~, Smarr: A /.~ co ~~ ~i ~ p 8 Y i i // 9/i 1°j ~ ~ f erg /~ ~ ~ ° Y / ~ / d ~ ~ / n ~ K ~ ~ i ~ i i ' , i ~' ~ ~ ..,~ I ~ ~• i N ., _ . a . f. H.~~ ' 1 } • y y 1 /~~ ~~ . ~~__ ~ '~ ~ I . ~ _- S= 'd C> z O U O x ~z ~a 0 n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT k DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: ~ City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Natter C. Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Designations of La Senda Road and Carol Avenue as Drivate streets and exempting the abutting properties from requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code It is recommended that the City Council forward this application to the Public Safety Commission for review and directives to protect the health, safety or welfare of those persons and properties adtacent to, and in the vicinity of, such street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Protects which are adtacent to streets that have not previously been determined by the City as private are required to dedicate any needed right-of-way for the constructien of public improvements and, unless exempt due to protect site or type, are reyuire~i w ~u„au~~t r~~d~: improvements within these public rights-of-way. These requirements have become the focal point of obtectlons by owners of property on certain residential streets, particularly in the Alta Loma section of the City, as they developed their property. Their contention was that, because these streets were unique in nature and are of substandard design and construction, that the improvement of the street would have a negative effect on the abutting property and the streets should remain private. Because of these concerns, on July 5, 1989, the City Council adopted an Ordinance which established a mechanism for the rcvlew and determination of whether a street could be designated as a Private Residential Street. This would thereby exempt the abutting properties to these streets from the requirements set forth 1n the Municipal Code for the dedication of public right-of-way and the construction of public improvements. This action regarding La Senda Roggad and Carol Avenue was triggered by Info A thatroffer~ ofh streeti dedlcatlonenofft site streets improvements and other engineering requirements will be required prior to map CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LA SENDA ROAD/CAROL AVENUE OCTOBER 3, 1990 PA6E 2 recardatian or building permit issuance whichever occurs first. The owner contended that La Senda Road, which their property abuts, was private and that the above mentioned requirements should not Dertaln. The property owner was given an option of filing an application to the City Clerks office per Ordinance No. 58-C for the review and determination if the street is private and eventually setting up a public hearing date far the City Council review. The owner subsequently submitted a petition of owners of properly abutting La Senda Road and Carol Avenue (63.38 of Lhe total parcels affected J The petition regaests that the Ctly Council make a determination. Several offers of street dedication exist and are recorded but were rwt accepted by the City. However, there are two properties that were inadvertently accepted by the City to 1979 without full public improvements. Vacation Droteedings would have to occur to order for any declaration of private street to be ftnaltzed. The referenced subject has been sent to the Firc 01str1ct for rev1M and comment. The mein concerns of the Firo D1strlcL arc 26 feet wide emergency fire access, street caDsbtitly to handle 70,000 lbs of emergency equipment and barrier protection for existing fire hydrants. Based upon our review arM analyysis of coraents obtained from the F1rc District and the Public Norks Subcoewlttee, public safely has been the main concern. It 1s thereforo our reeommendation to forward this apol icatinn rn rti. oyni ~~ e_!_y .-,~,±;;; ~;, ;a, ,caeca and dr recEtves LO protect the Health, safely or welfare of those persons and properties adjacent to, and Tn the vicinity of, such street. ResDeatfui)ly sub~~mitnted, SB:NCS:dIw ~~~ Attaclmrent /e)9 ~y v~, ~ kl I I ~ CITY OF t A SENDA iPOAO N ~$~; di CAROt AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA TPrLE: ENGIIPEERIId(} DIVISION E7Q~1'r .q ~~ /3~ ~_„ ,p-133x15-:-'---'--- °° Ta ! ; ~ 'I c ~ li ~ n I M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" i ~i H i J 1 ~^) ! I I ~ ~ i. .. _.._ . _- ~I-~,__. ._. ~~ y __ _ ~ - .-_ __._ _ .. _. _ _.__ Q l~~ '~, V/ ~ ~~ C'^ ~ ~ ~~ ~ _... ~ ~ I ~~~ ` _ ~ n iii o a~ v \ ~ rv , .___.__ .. ... - - p 4 ~~ a J N m .._ _an inr-~-.~ K. ~ J J a~: r a~ o ,.,.. _ .. ... O J T ~ ~ L v ~ ~d ~'~ V*' 0~ „M .,^. , .... _.~ -~3rV-.,....-u ___..-.__..~- v I y ~. .. / Vii ~ 0 ^ ry ~~ ~ 8 -C.i '~~ a r g. ~xj /31 C= ~j~ E~ €t~ ~a vy Q InM U - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA STAFF REPOftT DATE: October 17, 1590 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ORDERING THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 FOR PARCEL MAP 12854, LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE DF EAST AVENUE, BETNEEN CATALPA AND VICTORIA STREETS RECOMEMDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with the Formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGRWND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council's approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with the Formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District Na. 8 for Parcel Map 12854, located on the west side of East Avenue between Catalpa and Victoria Streets. The developer of the sub,~ect parcel map has been notified of the public hearing by mail and notices wn~n ~!:c posted at the cirn. ?!;~ - tsck~d resoiucron also approves the final tngineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 90-376. Respectf//idly submi~tt7ed, c7 Y]o~vQU~lp SB:JAA:dIw Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~Q- ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION N1TH FDRMATTON OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 AND .ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 12854 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca7iforni a, did on the 19th day of September, 1990, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 90-377 to order the therein described work in connection with the Formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. $, which Resolution of Intention No. 90-777 was duly and legally published in the time, form and Wanner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Hearing', was duly and legally posted in the time, form manner, location, and number as required 6y taw, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting of said notices on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to ail persons oxntn9 real property prapos ed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intent+on No. 90-377, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the iast mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, farm and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the off+ce of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, tfie City Council having Anew -^L.";reu considered evidence, oral and documen*a•y, ~~r~.:o,ning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and wncerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to br. derived ~:herefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA fiEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: .iECTION 1: That the interest and convenience requires the Formation of said D sf-tric~and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 90-377, be done and made; and SECTION 2; Be 1t further resolved that the report H'. ad by th°_ Engineer 7s erFi-e-finally approved; and SEl~TION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessme'~-~n~fi~e Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unti a er percent of said tracts have been occupfed. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MA NTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 PARCEL MAP 12854 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, DT vision 15, of the Streets and Highways Code of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTIGN 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report proposes the establishment of a Street Lighting Maintenance District for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 12854 only. This pros ect comprises the area immediately west of East Avenue between Victoria Avenue and Catalpa Street. Areas to be included 1n the work. program are the street lights within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City and are limited to local stnaets only as shown hereon. SECTION 3. SCOFE OF WORK The specific areas to be maintained by the District as defined in the preceding section, will became part of the active work program at such time as the specific areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, construction of the street lighting system, and upon demonstration of satisfactory operation, the acceptance by the District no later than the following July. The Develnnor Wni ..~._. . California Edison ~Com an W ~~ ~""" uay,uii wicn me Southern ordinary and usual n~aintenance,ooperation uand oservicing(icostsonofsthe street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. Upon establishment of assessment effective July 1 of each year, any remaining deposit shall be refunded to the developer. Nork to be provided for, with the assessments established by the District, consists of maintenance, operation and servicing of street lights. Annual Engineer's Reports will be prepared and approw~d by the estimatedccostefin~ne Dlhe ss a difSDecificattonsa foro al la streetr lighting will be prepared by the developers for the subdivision improvements and will be approved by the City Engineering Division. Detailed maintenance activities on the Street Li htln Maintenance Districi include: the furnish:"r,^ ^f ~ g g ordinary and usual maintenance, operatlon~~and~servicing of ianyf street light improvement and the repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the 111um1nation of the subJect area. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS Based on historical data adfusted for inflation, it is estimated that the quantity of street lights and the :aaintenance and energy costs for assessment purposes will be as follows: PARCEL MAP N0. 12854 The estimated cost (at current dollars) for the District as initially formed comprising the one (1) dwelling unit of Parcel 1 of Parcel ?Wp Ha. 22854. Lamp Quanttty~ bate" ' '"'"'~'~"_ ^^s` 1 ea. 9500 Lunen x f10.16 % 12 5121.92 TOTAL (121.92 MDTE: Arterial lighting shall be annexed into a separate district. • Assumed to be high pressure sodium vapor, 9500 lumen, actual type and size may vary. ** All night energy service per lamp per month Including maintenance costs. All the costs are based on Southern California Edison Company monthly rates including maintenance, All costs and areas are based on current CSG ma LCp a11U may Vr xqy INS ve ~=l lu iVl idi.uld jcui>. and unit cost may vary as the mouthy rate varies and as additional areas for maintenance are annexed to the District. The monthly rate is established by the Southern California Edison Company and is not currently controlled by the size of an area or any operation of the developer. The size of the areas being annexed to the District only has an influence on the total cost. The costs shown are estimates only, and the final assessment will be based on actual cost data. SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed Assessment Diagram for the projects that will comprise the original Maintenance Dl strict is attached to this report and labeled Exhibit 'A' - "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8". Exhibit "B" is a map 1of the District boundary. These exhibits are hereby IIIIY!'~IYI'=4Cd I,I llll rl t11C le xt VI thli IepVrt• SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to ail developed residential, institutional and commercial property within the District in accordance with the following relationship: LAND USE ASSESSMENT UNITS Single Farily Detached 1.0 Assessment Unit Multi-Family/Attached Residential .5 Assessment Unit Institutional/Commercial 1 Acre = 2.0 Assessment Units ESTIMJ.TE~ nilnVnL ASSESSMEi1T5 Estimated Parcel 1 r.° parcel Map No. 12854 Total Annual Cost (Section 4) E121.92 Assessment Units Single Family 1 d/u x 1 unit 1 assessment unit Estimated Assessment Rate = 621.92 = ;121.92 T Thus, estimated assessments of ;121.92 per assessau!nt unit will initially be required far the original District. Estimated assessments are far comparison only. Actual assessments will be set by public hearing each year in June and will De teased on actual energy and maintenance expenses and developed Land use suaawaries. .LCT1"vii i. UNOER OF EYENTS 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District and sets public hearing. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to fora District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Coy!.^.cil conducts a public hearing and approves or modifies and approves the individual assessments. EXHIBIT `A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.8 FORMATION -F NRiN(ANO AVENUE ~E CATALPA STREET, ,,,_ ~.. .~n.ra..r A<~T NpB FIIJ '1 v••••••• Y Y'( a .a n ; II•Nq'. ~ ~j ~.. a .i liY.n~ .!t! p : I v .. . V/Sl4 gT. ;a ~ ~ Y i .~ z `~ ff~~rv0£.~ M.ICCL ~ T ~ F ~ ~ ~ $:S-'cc-a "`---- B - ; z ~ $ te ;. ~ o ~~ < V ..~ i ~ ~ O C7 •E _ ~ ~. ~ ' w F m W ' ; .i F vl _+ l v U W _ y I W ~Ca F 8i W F g! m L1 n sna . wn !~. v.i .arn~..o'i ......,. .. ~ `~ .. r ~ ' .-. _ _.J _ ~. .. VKTOR/A STREET ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIONGA i . COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXH6R "S' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ULTIMATE DISTRICT BOUNDARY STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 I LIGHTNG _ .~ ' ,,,~ V - I f°°~'"" s"a _ FORMATION TI~7 ire °~' •~ ~ W s ~ j ~ I r *~ ..~ . i CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMON~A COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1 ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ''~ ` + ~, - DATE: October 17, 1990 TC: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Sul ',er, ty Tan ncr BY; Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN MENOME NT 90-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUC MONGA - A request to amend the density provisions of the Victoria Community Plan to require changes in land use designations to be approved by City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 - CITY OF R NCNO CUCAMONGA - request to amend the density provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan to require changes in land use designations to be approved by City Council. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Victoria Community Plan lmendment 9C-D2 and Terra Vista Ccc-°-it~ "1,~~ nweuumenc 9u-w and that Negative Declarations be issued for1each Amendment. ANALYSIS: Under the current provisions of the Victoria and Terra b'ista Planned Communities, flexibility has been provided in the designation of residential land uses to allow the development of the pl armed communities to respond to political, economic, and marketing conditions that may arise during boil do ut of the project. The Community Plans allow the trading of residential land use densities in one planning area for densities in another planning area, as approved through the Oevelo pne n t/Design Review process. On September 25, 1990, the Planning Commission considered amendments to the Victoria and Terra Vista Community plans that would require any redesi gnation of land uses to no .> ;_ n Council v wve_ and approved b_r City .he Piarrn ing Commission determined that it was appropriate for City Council to have the final action over such land use decisions, similar to a Development District Amendment. In addition, the Planning Commission determined that all projects should be subject to the new provisions. The issue of gra ndfathering in those projects that have been sutmitted and deemed complete by the date of the ordinance was not aDProved. See attached staff report and minutes for additional detail, C[TY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT V CPA 90-02 6 NCPA 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA OCTOBER 17, 1990 Page 2 E NU IRONME NTAL ASSESSMENT: After having completed the Environmental Checklist, staff has determined that the proposed Amendments will not have a si gnifiicant impact on the environment. Therefore, 'staff recommends Lhat the City Council issue a Negative Oeclara ti on for each Amendment. CORRESPON OE NCE: These items has been advertised in the inland Valley Dailv Bulletin newspaper as public hearings. Res pe ~lly su 'tied, Brad ler City Planner BB :SM:mlg Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of September 26, 1990 Planning Minutes of September 26, 1990 Ordinance Approving Victoria Coimnuni ty Plan Amendment 90-02 uouw nypi vriiry im,n ~i io La ~ulmnuni iy rian V Amendment 90-O1 / `i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 26, 1990 T0: Choi!nlan and Members of the Planning Commis Sian FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY; Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUB JEC7: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN MENDMENT 90-02 - ITY OF R NCHO CUCAMONGA - request to amend the density provisions of the Victoria Community Plan to require changes in land use designations to be approved by City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the density provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan to require changes in land use designations to be approved by City Council. ANALYSIS: Bac ka round; One of the unique elements of both the Victoria and Terra Yista Community Plans is the fl exibil ity built Soto the overall development of the nt~~~ed Cc,-;;,;;Ly meas. .~ t~~ai, economic, or marketing conditions may arise that suggest rearrangement of the land use designations. The community plans allow a trading of residential densities in one planning area for densities in another planning area provided the flexibility of the densities is found to he consistent with the goats and intent of the Community Plan. Currently, any proposal to change the land use designation of a planning area requires review and approval through the Development/Design Review process rather than the usual District Amendment (Zone Change) public hearing procedure. General: Over the last several months, much concern has centered around the mix of single family and multi-family residential uses that currently exist and the mix that can be anticipated dt h~ildout of the City: As a cult, iLaff has been di retied ro prepare an amendment to the community pions to require any redesignati on of land use densities to be reviewed and approved by the City Council. This does not preclude any developer from requesting a change in the land use designation. It simply provides an additional level of review, and public input for any proposal requesting such an increase in density, PLANNING COMMISSi' STAFF REPORT V CPA 90-02 a TV CP. e0-OS - CITY OF RANCHO LU CAMONGA SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 It is staff's recommendation that any current proposals being reviewed by staff or the Planning Commission be considered under the current planned community requirements. Any requests to redesignate a land use density submitted after the effective date of the Ordinance would be sub,l ect to the new provisions. C. Environmental Assessment: After having completed the Environmental Checklist, staff has determined that the proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a Negative Declaration for each amendment. II. FACTS FOR FiN DIN GS: The amendments will provide for the development of compre hensi ve'ly planned urban communities that are superior to the development otherwise allowable under alternative regulations. The amendments will provide for development of the planned communities in a manner consistent with the General Plan and which relates to element and growth management policies of the City. The amendments will provide for the construction, improvement, and eztensi on of tra ns DOrtation facilities, public utilities, and public services required within the planned communities. In addition, the amendments will not be detrimental Lo the public health or safety or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. •~•• itcnu 6a rc ueen aureri.iaeu in she iniana Valley Da ily~Bulleti n~news pa per as pu bitc hearings. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 90-02 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 90-01 and recommend issuance of Negative Declarations by the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolutions. Re y sub ed, Brad ~~ City P~ ner BB:SM;mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Excerpt from Victoria Community Plan Exhibit "B" -Excerpt from Terra Vista Community Plan Resolution Recommendfng Approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 90-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 90-01 /I~ =! =XI BILITY IN !AANAGING THE ?~~4N©Cigl/1'dI_POOf QU2iiCy _.. the :_ture, co rditions aay arise that suggest -eau angemerts !n the Land use ?lan desi;nat!o rs fcr .-di•r_duai sub-olaaniag areas as shown on _ae Land Cse ?ion and ..`.e Density Distribution ?lar.. ^`.e Ccmmur.iry ?ion !s Cesi;^.ed to ~ravid• a~xibility in trading tie !sidenti al _ensities .. cre sub-?1arainq area 'or densities in other sub-?-analog areas to Se developed in the lature. '. he Ccraaunity ?lar, oust also accommodate change caused Sy to.' _:a1, economic, or aa:kat corditiors, •+ithaut zet: aental'-y aldeetiag the ability to construct :he total '7!ctoria cortaiunity. 3y utilir!ng the Op tiaum ':field inproae _.. de ts:miaiag ~¢s:d¢.^.t:al de.^.a=tz _s, such `1ex!bi!it;, :an occur within toe design intone a! this Community ?1 an vitnout changiaq either the character and quality of each '7illage, or the total number aE units designated !or the Community Zinn area. 3ach V111age can accommodate some :hangs by inereasinq cr decreasing the number of residential dweL`ing waits in that Village without al toting toe intent of this t' an. according iy,- the Optimum Y!eld Aporoac:f allows a landowner, vi th in certain 1ia!ta tions, to redesignate the Land Cse ?i an desigr.atiors `. or sub-planning arsaa he owns. In other words, a landowner may increase the number o! dwelling units a one sub-olanninq ar a i! he doe: uses the number of dwe l'_inq unite in another sub-planning area he owns as '_ong as he maintains she total number off dwelling unite assigned by the Density Distribution Plan eo his property. additionally, density can be transferred !tom one Landawr.s: to another by mutual agreement, provided that other requirements see locth in Chia section are mat. ro ?rovide llezibility which maintains the integrity o! the Community P1 an and which oramotu the goals and desires o! the City of rancho Cucamonga, the loilowinq guidelines sF.all apply to the transler a! density within the Community ?lan area. 1. The ^umber o! dwelling unite proposed an the Density Distribution ?1 an aay be increased !or any sub-olanning area. Sowever, such increases should not alter the intone a! this plan to ?eevide a variety at rasider.tial Sousing ripen and denaitiea throughout each 7!llage and the eneire Community Plan area. additionally, t::e number o! un!ta proposed :or any subplannigg area aay :a dae:easad without a ar:aspendinq .....:¢as¢ i.^. aro ther aubplanninq area. C11Y OF •~ UCAMONGA ITEM: vcvl 58-oe PI.AIVI-!I ^,. ~-, ION TITLE: /~raoe~~ ,agv EXC~a~s " ` lil ]~ EXf~fC: A-/ SCALE: ~......:+,, .i.,..,z T 2. The Land Ose Plan dexig~ation for any sub-planning area may be redesignated as .oilows: a. "L" Land Cse designatiors can be redesignated to "Lt•!" land use designations for any sub-planning area. S. "LM" land use designations can be redesignated to either a "M" or "MPi" land use designation for any sub-planning area. c. "M• land use designations can be redesignated to "MA" land use designations for any sub-planning area. d. ^MH" land use designations ean.be redesignated to "Ef" land use designations .for any sub-planning area. 3. In order to provide flexibility in the development of the victoria planned Commuri ty over the 10-15 yeas life of the Plan, a maximum of 20a variation in the optimum yield nay be allowable. ( Any and all variations shall be reviewed and apeov~~ the Cosign Aeoiew Committee. ,n. "ar~acion in the num ~r o! dwelling units within one village msy require corresponding decreases in one or more o! the other villages to insure that the total number of units do not e:n..A aoec ...,..,_ . community ____ ___..... .w~ ii nnnea boundary. CITY OF •~ UCAMONGA ~M' vcoA mob'°t- PLANi~ , .. ION Trn.E: /ryn~..o g~, E,ri~„ s :.i.,' "......> It~~ EX}®IT:.4~P SCALE: ~~ me u a ~:. E C E E m ~ C m o y C L J N ~ 3 ~ ~' o fi c O O N ~ ~ A a A La v ']' ~. x C •~ W N E E v ~ U 7 O a jNL O C" ~ O O o.'.: V 4 Z' a ~~ E '~ U~ -a ~~ m ~~ o~ o o$ u t a c 'm .% o E A ~~ y C LL,. F~ O O U._ 3~N~~;,..- vnjNN,g~v L~ m C~ N o 3 T A m N c m m E~ p C -O1 a '•'~ a~ O L U A L 1 m L A n L o"Edu ~'L1;a'u^d n~~a °6 ,~ L OIL U . C C ~ > C a O L~ a L L" A A a a mvay-°o«q.m .T o ]um 3 ~m Ofa`o A yea n`$'c°]a°~y A~+'c o,oe C O L N A j N N S C y N L ~. C m ~. u C cu°1a v..m a._urc~^ as ._LaL N.N o ayO L Na'-L yygm°'N a~W°« ~y ~LF u, ~ O.m ~'inw LAP C C C a p U u~ O ] m > aN >,v cc= « _c i ~ ~ dE a a.c ~~ E ~ y~y C ~ ~ i vgg ~' >: ~ O. A O. N or vi V V L G u e :: O E a a a m a s >, a ~' I N yC a ~ ~a.•a ~ C C ~ .. ' q OL ; y" a y] L W '~ A C •' ° l ~ a' L N C ~ « U ~~«lY.y N~C._L ]Lorna°Na~~~10«N ~ y a E_ U a u C O L O C g e~~cE iv;~;aNc « ag ~ o.= v~La m m c u ~ N G N rn W L >. N~~ L N; C L •'o ,'o BaN EAO '9 >` tl Q' n ~ _ j h di.m a«a C° La t= era>~ ; ~ ~ . , . 'N y_~~E do F~ ~D E.N. y . V L ~ C d a C y N d N C. O' " ~ 3 O1 N N~~ .p L Y q V~ y m a ~ yg~ = ~ « $ ~ a ~ c d e ~ ary ~ ~ca q' ~ ai 2.ty ~J rn~ ~ •• ~ a o m • c c •• v, Ca a] a-.. a N._._ry c ~ o_ a v E a] La ~C O A~~>.L~ W•'uU O 'a C~ ~''y~ N~ F'~ N a x L a m~ C~ N~ ~ L j a y y~ N j C? ., u C~ g C C y.c ~ c ~ _ E ; L o _ A E ~ ] N ~ a 8;C ~~N~U~ryLN« L u ~~L C O O a a° ^ m ~ C A", va ao.v^ac~w..a °ty« _ N L U O. O J >, O~ ] C OL C ry ~ ~c~3'^a v ~ Ero v a l°]; O N> y C g a J 3 m r N C L N.N p E` C a ~ N N a N a o a> a~ e ~ m a H C <..7 l a r L n A A 0 0 u ~ E C L ~f N« q C E ~ a "' ~ c ~3 a~ y N v. V ~ 6 ~ N O~ L N y~ E N '- C > ~..cE°1Oyr~~~ ° a d A a o o W m E Y w O V ~r ~ J u L_o.E y m ~~y~o.gy~y m aO ]aai .. aEi;L~ O > N C N ] ~°~g3~o>'>~ _ 'an a ~ a ;m eLi „ ~i ~ _ O. a- C a C >. ~ V N •.AU ER«~.V. Nw]. u m a C ENS C73 ~'u«p gig ~ L~ ~ Q • Np a as v C ') OI U] L ~ C y H L a.~C O O~ ~uv n~gmq'c '«~'~m ~C~ ~X.V/~ ~ L ~ u = a L D °° >.CL O A Ec-E33 v o'L a E a x o rn n y _ y U c ~Aw. ,OL m ] ~' j N a V v x t F m c~ c ~; •a';u 3 Na ~aO`O ~a]o ., ,, a> ~ c._ C C O V W ~ N N O.~~~UN _NL ° NvL > y Q ° r N ~- a a -• L °~« m.. a`r«o ~~a U~ Y ~ c o $ u q a E N u n o 1L-aaiDa ~ •LSF ~~/ f" Q-/ ~O E.c a~ y t a c Pi o~ c~ Lo g g q~~ u t «'~ `« i d« c i- «_ d d d~^ .-. ° C d j C D 'O" p L c6p _d d L g m D L" O N y U° C j] CT L C d; N •• r '/• O y ` d~ N a d L> °~ N ~'" L Z O O qE ~ O N U~ 0 3 9" w L d C ~°o-na °cj~E °cqc.. ~F' 7Lmrir ga"«ogodLUludiED01N~C- ~ a La c d rn9 L v7i _y w a m 3 ~~ 0 3- q `o L r 'c° ~~ N 7 e L c a c _o° 'Cy 8 .Q q OYE Cyy L G_ P g C q W s V; d ~;[ L i/i •+ N a~ L~ ~` ~D ~ C A y[ y d 3 d do d ,3 c~D ~D~.-a g~ j7~] Lm3>°~tyl m~ D d G C~l~'O >.~7~q ~..JGC ~CNdyid N.r1L«7rLN ice; Cq~7L~ • «v ~c_.rn ° 0 9u°d«t cQaLrnv «.+o' rn«eqi x-"d ~~. ~= d oL G 7 C y 0 ~ Y~ o r D A •VI Cp r d E N ~LL N d~ A« g T d L p.N C [; m'T a3 dc5 «a°nCOiodE-`~L 1C •q 6mLGV G.t.wdOL Qy~~c~QQ Va~v~~~ E~tYW.o 'L"~1°r .°°L ~rdAL>d°o. E>.«"~° d b N E c g N G G- C d q '~ q. A C R" U :1 ~' ~ N° d F- O« V u d Y > d d VI yl L p L g ul « L C V. ~ L O. ~ L d t C A 3 r L D at. 7 a C= Y l N~ d q CO .NC B E N ~+ a r 0 °~ D C qp O E r" N~1 W r- N J G Y .>..0. N ~."'in COJQC G«r C; dy Odq Od NLOO-OEr 00>. Ld ~D.N, v oCC 0c E~~'EQ •. Brea "1" ~m~ >v._o-«~ °u a~ aDdEE.O •+7 Np ~O~7N°L_ -J 41 MNy Q~NppO"•°OC LC. L'u7y NCJ L LO C L L d N b G L V L r. ~ C m C U Y U r S q OUyC VdI L L O L N 01 q V Y L$ VP~ ~O1v yP..V O°aU.. Fq~. OC106CdLq~q-a N°~. O.a~i-C OO.C q4 T >. d C d 1 'Q • q I D N N >. I L d d v v v aui p~c..L atd x"ECN cd-d«oo~_ q q A Fd 8~~u r'~CS~NONNm i~H iNn '~ ''^ ''^ '~ '~ a` cm~u cw<~m«ydE~ua j ~Lm~ Y N d d NdCN LAd NC OCQL°U d.Nq 7 d d d d d N W ~~ « w N U Y V y CO ~ g O L L L ,= y t d N~~ C ' ~ a E~ N~m~ ~Y~>='~«.O.D C.. ..D d~a>i «~ry C C d 7 L U d rlJ _N d D'- V U U V y to v gLCU ~7•Nd gr1-tN U°V ~ oai ~ry o ~~ dqc~~ Psi. gy~+oq LV.°m~£~~nm~1 PS gL~q~ C7 CM NO DEC .d.0 `~u•.r~COIV TCr`°.Olw. .,O m rnD rn7 rn «i w~N ~ - YdAt ',L,~«~ d~Ec a .~9 a~ vd ..~ mV ex .o ~Pi3ti=,V ~qycyv°uUeo~~~~ a; a T m D N o o~ L d a~ v a o> E X ~ m v ~ c -- 7° D N 7 d N a d 7 d C` _d N ~~ .V ~ E.l a G L N« .'~. N li L d n« 7D j~ 7t 7 C C ~ N Oary q w do0 6yCyEH d NV ~~.. N n'[. ~ V LC O LL iS Ot y 7 OC Ly0 wL OC y ~~ N~ ~O ~= VO1 yO q~N ~ppJ4C.Cdy°GD> ~7CCi+iLCC7L - S J e~ I k 7 a w. q L ~ C Y N L «P •N NpO,:u : C r l C .. J_ __ S° s T` dCN` NN«33 NvG 6•C jdg'7W TrCL.~ - E ~•°• ~« ~ ° !t H3`o5 <mJSs~m=XEv~nm~v~on~v • ~,/~• ~VcpA 9o-oi T ~x~t-ert a-z n C a C O D L _N 'm C D Y > , L ~ Y W « r N Y N 0. t ~ .. C o '~ U ~ Y m~ C C ;~ a~ 8= T 3i d C ~~ "y T ~~ Y R fJ .c .a T w Z L~ N~ C~ O l~ N MM L Y:i~~ q R E « >.,, « Y N W !. C Y O) N L y ~C ccc~ ~ N 9944 ~ N'N N C 0~ 4 y N C ~ W Y'r U ~ y .Ny~UN«d «q am~c°««'~~a. ~ N my Y=° o+n c° Y `oU ~ c~La~y a « 930fL;a.~NyO1 C~'~ CY'~u. ~` CN V ~u Y~JON E.. N~Op ««a.T.^F7 u>Gi N y~ y N W 8 8 L Y a Y~ rENCyV ~L L Yag9• YY«~«i LN]YNH~C'N L cv a~~p~"o~; v 01L Y«««O Y .d+ .~ L d y~y EyE x Y VECa'm y~ q~ ~ E O Y~ O V j9 GCi9ac W~~y'j Of~~m9 yE V•~O~O LL ~ w G E N a~ m 9 Y N Y i d LL Y ~ .~. c C V 444 0 ~ v ~ ~ vY Omj N Y V E~ Qa ~r -« A ` L L u U~ La r A Y Y N C Q T ~_ « ~ N d N Y C 'voc .Y~sc a Y i{+~'- rv ,r ~ O W YNLC~ Oaay 7 N Y~ Y D a ~ Y E TL YE ~';Y~c`ovN~ E~~3 a~i ii 'O ~,.N~ ~ ~ m~ L" a C ~' R O C Y Y yyE y~~; qq L~ A 3 GTGIC~ C 4~ O.~ 9 C_Y Y !0 C 9~Eav«~~c•C~ ??~~ N c EL&m ~R'~N ).mL n.E ~«~wa mE;Y~~: a3`~.~~CC C L Y« Y T 7 N«~ R « O~ 9 gC4~pgC«j0 Ttlw aE~~`Yd T~d~ugY.°c 'Y E•«-~ 7~ E Lm 2~$ F E ~ E99H 10 > C0~.~9 ~7 pY Y Y p N9= L > > E Y L 2 Y C G Y L O L Y « «r., r « $Y,cvm g~ C m « E ~ a Y ~r N a O'_v O ~ Y' ~ Y N ; L Y ~? Y T N N L N 0 «C~~Y Y A y Nw w ~1~ w - «a c E ~ /~~+ A N Y Y Ya g~ a N ~ O L ~•"e ~ m a TC' C O•~ ! N a`~.u~ C C 7 O m Y a Y .°. T m C« 0.,~ ~~ N Y c ~ O y M C ~ 4~ E O1L C QI oCa $ c d~ F TY~~ 1b-CY txvtiv,- a-,~ NA sm {' m 9 w N O: ..,,, ciir ur annum cu unnvnun - n request w amens cne aensicy provrsi ons or the Victoria Community Pan to require changes in land use designations to be approved by City Council. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COIMAUN ITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 - Ci Y OF NCHO CUCAMONOA - request to amend the density provisions o the terra Vista Community Plan to require changes in land use designations to he approved Dy City Council. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and a requested revision clarifying Exhibit A to Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 90-01. Commissioner Mel cher asked how many projects were currently in process which could be affected by the Change. Mr. Murphy responded that two projects are currently fn process. Commissioner Melchor asked if the projects were consistent with ii~e area development plan. Mr. Murphy replied affirmatively. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Oary Lu quo, Project Mara ger for 1Jiil tam Lyon Co., 8540 Archibald, Suite B, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they did not oDPCSe the amendment. He stated he did not see any language in the Resolution to support staff's recommendation that projects already in Drocess wnnid no o.a~.cd`.,,,„ .~,~ „~w provision. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that any projects wi to entitlements would not be aff¢c ted. He suggested that if the Commission agreed with staff, they may wish to add a Statement that the Ordinance could affect all projects submitted after the date of the Ordinance. Donna Durham, 7682 M1mbl eton Court, Rancho Cucamonga, asked how the change would impact the community. Chairman McMiel replied that in the original creation of the planned communities, provisions were included to allow developers to increase densities by one category on the density scale with approval of the Planning Commission. He state4 the new regulations would require that such requests be approved Dy the City Council as well as the Planning Commission, Ms. Durham asked if ft w0uid affect protects already in process. Mr. Murphy stated that the two projects referenced have not been approved as yet; they were still in the process of going through the various review stages. Planning Commfssion Minutes -10- September 26, 1990 r~ Hearing no further testimony, Chai moan McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chi tiea stated that she understood the reason for Mr. Lu que's request that projects in process not be affected, but she was not inclined to agree. She felt that'if City Council wished to review such requests, they should have the opportunity to review them. Comm ssioner Melcher stated that he felt it was a giant step from the planning process into the political process and he had no objection to such decisions being made by the City Council but he regarded it as unfair to make the rule applicable to projects which have already advanced far along rf,e processing t roc K. Commissioner Chi ti ea stated that even though the projects may be far along in the processing track there are no guarantees until a project has been approved. She felt such projects were open to change and should meet all of the requirements. Commissi ~~er Tol stoy agreed. C hai moan McNiel stated that the item was brought before the Planning Commission as the result of a City Council review of zoning, particularly zoning applying to multiple-family housing. He agreed that it was unfortunate for projects to be caught in mid-processing but if other rules such as garages versus carports changed, those new requirements would have to be met. He was inclined to agree that it was in the best interest of the community to apply the change to virtually every project possible. Commissioner Melcher stated he was tampelled to point out that no changes in development standards or physical development requirements were proposed. Mr. Buller outlined the history of the Victoria project currently in process. He said it had been through the Planning Commission, gone up to City Council on appeal, was deferred bark to the Commission, and is cur re n4ly in neighborhood workshops trying to reach a resolution to the design of the project. He said under current rules the Planning Commission could take final action on the project unless it were appealed to the City Council. He said that if the amendment were adopted and applied to that project, the final action would rest with the City Council, not the Planning Commission. Chairman McMiel stated that both the Milliam Lyon Co. and Lewis. Development Co, would have the opportunity to request that City Council not make this amendment applicable to the their projects in process. Commissioner Melcher asked if the Resolution as currently written meant the rn dre n6 ezrn ntinne_ Mr. Buller replied that as the Resolution was Currently drafted there are na exceptions. He suggested that if they wished to exempt the projects currently in process they may wish to add language that all projects sudnltted and deemed complete prior to a specific date would be exempted from the Planning Commission Minutes -I1- September 26, 1990 i~9 provision. He said that adoption of the Resolution a5 written would not allow for exemptions, unless the City Council adds exemptions, which they may do when they review it. Motion: Moved by Chi ti ea, seconded by Tol stoy, to adopt the Resolutions recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 90-02 and Environmental Assessment and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 90-01, as written, with the revision to Exhibit A on the Terra Vista Community Amendment 90-01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CN ITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER, WE INB ERGER ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Commissioner Mel Cher stated he did not recall the project in Terra Vista but the project in Victoria had been brought to the Planning Commission for approval; and because of objections raised, the developer had been making a good faith effort to redesign the project to make it ac ce pta 6le to the immediate community, Ne felt it was unfair to subject that project to political pressure at this time. Commissioner Weinberger agreed that a grandfather clause should be included. . • + . . L. VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 90-08 - BROCK - A request to redu t inimum net average lot sire from 22,500 to 22,162 square feet an reduc he minimum loi depth of Lat 1 from 150 to 120 feet for a of air l,.li vic 9S a _ .s ,._~ " ° `- °cf~ Lvn neaiden Li ai - OLricC (less than "dwelling ~uni is per acre) ~l oca tad east of Haven enue and north of Rfng m Orive - APN: 0201-121-24. Related fil Tentative Tract 14771. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSME N6 TENTATIVE TRACT 1477 - BROCK - A residential subdivision of 40 single ly lots on 25. es of land in the Very Low Residential Otstrict (less tfla, dwell in its per acre) located east of Haven Avenue and north of Ring D m - APN: 0201-121-24. Related file: Variance 90-08. Beverly Nissen, Associate Dlanner presented` staff report, Chairman MtNiel opened the~pdblic hearing. Steve She""" Bro^ H 80 Shelby Street, Ran Cucamonga, thanked staff for their k on the project. He said ha had iota tad comments from staff and sur unding residents and he felt the developmen was compatible with the ne boyhood. He stated thefr traffic engineer had su tad reports substant ing that the project was well within the parameters, egardinq stree raffic, He said alternatives had been submitted for Lats'~ the Planning Commission Minutes -12- September 26, ~~~ ORDINANCE N0. ~~~ AN ORDINANCE OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRD'VING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90~-02, AMENDING THE DENSITY PROVISIONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN i0 REQUIRE CHANGES IN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS i0 BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, ANO MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (ij On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Victoria Community Plan Amendment. Fallowing the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90-124, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 90-D2. (ii) On October 17, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. (iii) A11 legal pre requisities prtor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The Li ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Ser r;~~ ~.~ T': ;; ^o,,,,,,;; iiereoy specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Drdinance are true and correct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance With the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. Section 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: (a) That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is Superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulatfons; and ^; *hat the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and /~' CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. V CPA 90-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA OCTOBER 11, 1990 Page 2 (c) That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development with the District. Section 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment 90-02 changing the Victoria Commnity Plan text: a5 at*. ached ;,, rYhibit "e " Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be pu 6lished within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once to the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, falifornia and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~sa- EXHIBIT "A" The Victoria Community Plan, page 197, item number 3, shall be modified to read as follows: - 3. In order to provide flexibility in the development of the Victoria Planned Community over the 10-15 year life of the Plan, a maximum of 20 percent variation in the optimum yield may be allowed, Any and ali variations shall be reviewed and app;•oved by the Design Review Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. The variation in the number of dwelling units within one village . /S3 ORO[NANCE N0. ~? AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01, AMENDING THE pENS[TY PROVISIONS OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN TO REQUIRE CHANGES [N LANp USE DESIGNATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Rec ita is. (i) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Terra Vf sta Community Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90-125, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Pmendment No. 90-01. (ii) On October 17, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. (i ti) All legal prerequisities prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: section 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has heen reviewed and cens idered in camel is nce with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative peclara ti on. Secticn J: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: (a) That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and (b) That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and /S ! CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. ?VCPA 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUL0.MONOA OC?OBER 11, 1990 Page 2 improvement, or ex tens ionT of transport tion wfaci /i ties pu6l is eu tilities,~a nd public services required by development with the District. Section 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 90-01 changing Lhe Victoria Community Plan text, as attached in Exhibit "A." Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be publf shed within fifteen (IS) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Vatlev Da ilv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~J~ EXHIBIT "A" The Terra Vista Community Plan, page VI-7, left column, shall be modified to read as ~fol lows: "LM" land use designations can be redesignated to "M" land use. "M" land use desi9na Lions can be redesignated to "LM" or "MH" land use. "MH" land use designations can be redesignated to "M" or "H" land use. "H" land use designations can be redesignated to "MH" land use. Modifications of this nature shall be reviewed and approved 6y the Design Review Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council. The provision of affordable housing is an important goal of . 1510 ------- CITY OF EtANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE October l7, :990 7Q Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker. Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Update nn Labor Camn and Arrow Rom This report will serve to update the Council on activity and actions reg. the labor camp and Arrow Route, Staff last reported on this issue to the Council in November 1989. Below listing of actions and activiLCS occurring in this area since that last repot General Activity i. In November, responding to requests by the City, the owner of the labor camp property completed a major site clearance. This clearance involved removal of most of the underbrush and piles of debris on the property. This has resulted in making the site less attractive to transient camp sites and lesx of potential fire risk. Since that time, the weeds on the property have grown back and staff con acted the owner in early September to clear the site again, 'I'hc property owners have commi«cd [o clearing the site before the end of October. A• ,4.. .. .,f ,1.n ('i, ,Fs ~( IF. F+a. neIPA more trespassing signs Flo help ,^police enforcement and ^have repaired gates and fences around the property. Pnlice Dcpartment 1. At least once a month, the Police and the INS make limited sweeps through the arcs to make their presence felt. These monthly sweeps by the INS are limited due to the limited resources available to them. In addition to the limited sweeps, a larger coordinated raid occurred in May 1990 and another is planned within the next two months based on availability of the INS personnel. 2. The Police Dcpartment has and willLL continue to make extfensive pattnle olnnpn p~~n,V to ,IIP MCTI[Ig nQ~rY In Inf11IP that al! IaWC are being enforced including the stopping restrictions along the street. The Police will also continue to hand out EDD Biers in English and Spanish. 3. The Police Department is continuing to track citations for Drunk and Disorderly Conduct in the vicinity of the BI Chico Market to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Baard, S7 Responded to two grass fires in the vicinity of the labor camp. These fires took plact on May Jg, 1990 and July 1, 19W. These fires were in tha fields adjacent to the labor camp and not in the labor camp itself. These properties are included in the annual weed abatement program and the property owners havt been notified to clear these fields. E=flZ'L'1L`S Currently the owner of the property has a development application in the Planning Division. This current application is incomplete, although the developer has stated that he wiii have a complete apolication to submit to Planning before the end of the year, When a complete application is tinaliy received the project will begin the normal prxess through the City, The proposed development is fora 344 unit apartment or townhome complcs. During the month of January, Code Enforcement removed three inoperative vthicles from the premises of the apartment complca adjacent to the labor camp. in addition to removing these vehicle, Code Enfomtment continue to monitor the area for any additional code violations. 2. In early February, staff was made aware of three houses on Arrow which were vacant and open to transients to occupy, YICVIUaniy, liwaO , ~-~~,~::; ti~~•A^a hot had hMa broken into and occupied. ~Codc Enforcement contacted the new owners who had Code Enforcement then worked with the owners to have the buildings demolished and their lots cleared, This action was accomplished on June 20, 1990. Above are the actions that have taken place since the last report. The staff end the agencies with which we have been working will continue to meet in an effort to mselve the problems that xcur in this area of the City. Respectfully Submitted, !58 ------- CITY OF RANC4I0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATF• October 17, 1990 [C? Ff20M Mayor and Members of the City Council Duane A. Baker, As:,istant to the City Manager S[B37E(T: Reorncramminy CDBG Funds Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council set a public hearing date to consider reprogramming Community Devetopmen[ Block Grant funds to Sierra Madre, Vinmar and Calaveras Streets south of Ninth Street. This reprogramming would be in the amount of 520,000 and would allow design of these pmjccts to take place this year. Aackground: As part of its deliberations on southwest Cucamonga, the Commission considered the reprogramming of CDBG funds to the City to assist with other efforts to improve the o Ccmmission unanimously supported the concept of rcprogram~~ and asked that the City Council consider the reprogramming meeting. - - - -..:. ~w;s „gig.,: ,.Jopwu i,y rirc Ciry wuncii and in tnc CDBG plan approved Eby the •~City~Council, 5240,000 were allocated for capital improvements. Or. the schedule for this year ere Sierra Madre, Vinmar and Salina north of Ninth Street. The designs for all three of these projects is already complete and they arc ready Cor construction. However, there is only enough money m construct the Sierra Madre project at this time. The Sierra Madre project north of Ninth Street is estimated to cost approximately 5200,000 including all contingencies and protect administration. The remaining 540,000 is not sufficient to begin construction on the other streets north of Ninth. It is being recommended that 520,000 be programmed to design the capital improvements for the streets south of Ninth Stree!. Once the designs are complete, these projects will be ready for construction and allocation of construction funds can 6e considered when the City Council holds its regular CDBG hearings as part of the budge[ process in 1991. Ries ectfully Submitted, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Charles Huquet, Councilmember SUBJECT: ADOPTION OY A C08T ANALYBI9 POLICY RNOARDINO POBLIC PACILITI88 Recommendntio it is recommended that city council adopt a policy requiring an operational analysis containing costs of operations and maintenance prior to the approval of any new public building, park or similar facility to be built. Since the incorporation of the City, Rancho Cucamonga has established itself as a City of vision and excellence in virtually all aspects of Municipal Government. Through creative endeavors the City has bean able to fund major infrastructure projects and City programs to enhance the quality of life within the community. However, once these infrastructures and oroarama haves h.+on n„t into place, other operational and maintenance impacts takes over. In order to address these impacts, Council should require that an operational analysis containing costs of operations and main- tenance be prepared and canaidered prior to the approval of any new public facility to be built. The operational analysis should identify associated budgetary implications while at the same time contain an examination of ways to minimize costa of operations and maintenance, without losing sight of achieving the criginal goals of the public facility to be built. This approach would help insure the most cost effective public Paci'_itiea policy. JBF/tlr JBF:389 cc: Jac;; Lam, City Maragsr Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the Cit Council FROM: Tack Lam, AICP, Cit Mana er SCIBJECT: RBQiJBBT BY CITY OF FORTARA TO TA88 A P08ITZON R86ARDINO REMOVAL OF $OCALYPT08 TR888 ALONG T8E I-SO FRBERAY The City has received a letter Prom the City of Fontana requesting Rancho Cucamonga to join them in taking a strong position against the removal of healthy eucalyptus trees along I-10 for the sole purpose of billboard visibility. The City Council is being asked to consider this item. Respectfully submitted, .Tank T.am aYnn City Manager JL/pr 90-271 City of Fontana C A L I T O R N I A OF RAi~~~ i-t ~~. „~~ , Septewber 23, 1990 ^CT -. rcl,n,l2trt2,3~~~ Mayor Dennis L. Stout City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Dear Mayor Stout: As you are aware, we have been discussing the issue of preserving the healthy Aucalyptus trees along the I-10 corridor for some time now. The preservation of those trees as windrows, for aesthetic beautification of our corridor and i~c Li.n is irini,uriu siynii icance is essencia t. aunougn our discussions have included input from arborists, landscape architects, the billboard companies, the City staffs, elected officials, and most importantly, the citizens (who have urged against tree removal); we have come to a point where the clear cut issue is whether the trees should be removed solely for the purpose of billboard visibility. The Federal H±.ghaay Adm inistraticn (FHWA) has issued a memo stating that their policy is that vegetation must not be removed from interstates and highways in order to provide visibility to billboards. A copy of the FHWA memo stating this policy is attached for your review. State Senator Ayala has indicated that he has not yet ^ken position -- `ie matte[ aiiu i~ waii.iny Lu hear from those who have concerns regarding the preservation of the trees along the T-10 corridor. // 835991ERRA AVENUE IP.O. BOX 61 B1 ~ FONTANA CA4FORNI~YR3J~-0318 ~ pt~)a6o-1800 818TER CITY - KAMLOOPB, &C. CANADA ., Mayor Dennis L. Stout September 24, 1990 Page Two Please join me and our City Council in taking a straig position against the removal of the healthy eucalyptus trees and support the continued preservation of these majestic landmarks. On October 2, 1990 the Fontana City Council will again, voice its opposition to this very disturbing action affecting our envircr.^!ert. ' cerely your Q. ~ than A. Simon yor NAS/11 Attachments cc: Senator R. Ayala Assemblyman J. Eaves Fontana Council Members Elected Representatives and City Managers J. O~SUllivan Y. Ferrdro A. Calvert /63 ~cB: ~~B'0] 90 :S: L ® ~ USDparmvt a vwaonc+An . q~onrt~wtwa ~> !_. - .„ o.:. MAY 18~ qgp s~m:w~ Scenic Enhancement Initiatives Associate Administrator for Engineering ar,Mm HRW ~12 vram aad Prcqram Dsvelopmaat ^°" " Washington, D.C. 20590 ro~ Regional Federal Highway Administrators The preservation of the eavironmental and scenic goal' of our Nation's highways concerns u9 all. Tha President's po icy goal of. improving *ko environment reouires that we raevalua~e our role in protecting and enhanein4 the highway environment. We are exploring several options to mast the president's olicy goal, including a study of the feasibility of a scenic byways system. However, w believe certain actions should be taken now. First, we are rescinding our March 15, 1977, mamorandm¢ permitting vegetation clearance to improve the visibility of outdoor advertising signs. We recognize that maintenance of highway rights-of-way for safety and other highway opeaations . e«o«a ~csnnnf.ibil itv. However, to clear vegetation solely to improve the visibility of signs subject to removal uneer cu^ Highway Boautitieation Program is not environmentally respo:lslve. It is Federal Highway ]ldministration poll to be sensitive to anvirormental concerns, therefore such vegetation clearance can no lohgar be endorsed. Direction should Abe provided the Division offices to assist the States in I rescinding their existing vegetation clearance agrsomanp and/or permit program. II our second initiative is to eneo•.u-ags States to retain,lrather than dispose of, axcua property that canld bo used to store preserve, or enhance rho scenic beauty and quality of e highway environment i.n accordance With 23 CFR 713.30~(d In this context, ratentian has a project related bentfit. such bene_"its co*,~d teat u<}a scenic vistas, wetlands {both presser and potential) and preservation eP wildlife habitat. Slates shculd thoroughly evaluate their exeeas property inventir-es and classify such property accordingly. Please ensure that all States are preaptly advisee oP Loragoinq. .~ - - Anthony R. Kano /6`~ City Council Agendn ~~ p = October 17, 1990 e eP aYy 3` pAGE 1 i I ADDENDUN NO. 1 H. CITY MANAGER'S BTAPP REPORTS Tha following iteaa da naE lagallp ragnira any public I ~ tastiaanp, although the Chair u7 open tha orating for public I input 3. NSIDERAT20N OF RESOLUTION S P A ING OP SB ~ I , RESOLUTION NO. 90-410 i A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF nPNCHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE REPEAL OF SB 2557 AND 9UPPORTING THE DEVBLOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES THAT PROVIDE ADEQUATE LONG TEAM FUNDING POR CITIES AND I i i i t i ~ i COUNTIES I I ~ j ICI i I I I RHSOLVTION NO. 90-410 A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING TH8 REPEAL OF SB 2557 AND SVPPORTING TEU:• DEVELOPMENT OF ALTEANATI VBS THAT PROVIDE ADEQUATE LONG TERM PUNOING POR CITIES AND COUNTIES WHEREAS, attar the longest budget stalemate in Cal ifornia'e history, the Governor and California Legislature finally enacted a 1990/91 budget package that shifts state and county costa to cities, and diverts city revenues Lc tinxnce state/county reeponeibilit iee; and WHEREAS, counties are an administrative arm of the state with responsibilities for carrying out state programs, while cities are In a different business of providing local municipal services which are determined locally and have no reeponeibility or authority for administering et ate oz county programs; and WHEREAS, the Governor and California Legiel afore have eh ifted state and county financial reeponeibilit iee to cities; and WHEREAS, all 457 cities Ln California balanced their budgets only to find their budgets were subsequently thrown out of balance by toot ehifte and revenue losses designed to balance the budges of the state;a nd WHEREAS, the actions in the State budget package were enacted by passage of SE 2557, which (1) directsd counties to charge cities, school dietrleta and special district for the county function of adminietering the property tax; (2) authorized counties to charge cities for booking prisoners arrested Ay city employees; and (31 allowed mnnH en ~.. .e~.,.. _ __ revenues that shoo ld otherwise go to 90 "NO and Low Tax Cities"; and c "~- WHEREAS, these ehifte of city revenues to count Les were specifically enacted to replace cute in state revenue for counties that should have funded state reeponeibilltiee carried out Dy count iee; and WHEREAS, the Governor sad California Legislature have avoided Chair financial reeponei6111tiee by enacting measures that are poor public policy, which rob from one local government to Elnance another, end result In no reel solution to the continuing financial problems facing all levels of government in California; now THEREFORE EE IT RESOLVED, that the City Of Rancho Cucamonga supports the repeal of Se 2557 and the protection of clt iee from the state budget process; and support alterOa*_ive that :... provide adnaunte inns-rerm ,.w,.g ror cif iee ane count lee. f""-" 'Originai,Poor Quality --/a/sE.~j -- /s=/,~-/6g s~~s Zs~ .. ..L,... .. . ... ORDINANCE N0. 426 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF TITLE l5, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO LUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE STANDARDS NFPA 13D q.ND NFPA 13R, BOTH PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS iN RESIDE NTiAL OCCUPAN- CIES AND CERTAIN BUILDINGS ACCESSORY THERETO, WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS AND EACEPTIONS TO SAID CODES A. Recitals. (i) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division I of Title 5 of the California Government Code authorizes adoption by reference of National Fire Protection Association Standards NFPA 130, 1989 edition, and NFPA 13R, 1989 edition, each as published by the National Fire Protection Assocf ati on. (ii) At least one copy of each of said Standards, certified as a full, true and correct coDY thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the city of • Rancho cucamon ga, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50022.6. (iii) A duly noticed public hearing as required by the Government .. L. [nnno 0 6.. 6.. n.. .. A..n 1nA nA nnlnd"d h,. Thu aAnntinn r c....,. ... a nn•nn of this Ordinance. (ivl All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code entitled "Bail di nas and Construe ti on" cf the tv Ccunc it of the City cf Ra nc he Cucamonga is hereby amended, provided that said amendment shall not apply to or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, and provided further that the Uniform Lodes adopted and amended by Ordinance No. 412 of this City shall continue to be applicable to construction for which permits have been issued prior to the effec tt ve date of this Ordinance. SECTION 3: Chapter 15.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is /~ hereby amended by adding Sections 15.1/2_.166 ard~15.12.168~to read as follows: V ~~llJ ar"//~~•/~ /6'9 7v Ordinance No. 426 Page 2 1512.166 Section 3802 (h) Amended - Group R, Di vi si an 1 Ottu ancies. Section 3802(h} of said Uniform Buil .ing Code is amen a to read as follows: Section 3802(h) Group R, Df vision 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 1 Occupancy as follows: to every apartment house three or more stories in height or containing more than 15 dwelling units, and every hotel three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms, the system is to be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1, "Design Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems," except that residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. The water flow alarm for such systems shall be monitored by an approved central station. 2. In all new Group R, Di vi Sion 1 Occupancies, other than those specified in subsection (h) 1. above, the system shalt be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less than Three Stories in Height." 15.12.168 Subsections 3802 (i) and (;) added - Group R. . Di vistan 3 and Group H, Divtston tcu pa ncies. Section 3802(1) Group R, Oi vi si on 3, Occupancies. An automatic t;"n .n.i nbliee coclem .6,n he ;nc tail ed in all new Group R, Division 3 Occupancies. System design and ins taliation shall be conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses." (jj Group M, Division 1 Occupancies. An au~:omatic fire sprinkl- ing system shall be installed in all new Group M, Division I Occupancies constructed within ten feet (1 )') of a residential occupancy. EXCEPTION: Group M, Division 1 Occupancies exempt from permit requirements by Section 301(b) 1 of the Uniform Administrative Code, as adopted. PFIYa tE gara GES and; cr carports attache" to or accessory to residential buildings may be supplied from the system serving the primary use, however, piping and installation within the accessory portions shall be in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1. ~. -I,UStR~~ ~-. ~~ ~~ 7 xVlcdical Y. out of 6. people over the age of 30 will die of a heart attack this year. 4 of 6 deaths will be due to slow response. In any emergency the amount of time it takes for help to arrive is the moat important factor. In a medical "^=ergs=.~y tune is tae only thing that matters. Time is one thing you can't buy- more ~: of, Old CAN YO~T ? ~]~ire Some one Dies in a I~'ire every 55 seconds ,, 68% of all home fires result in a COffipl@te 1095 of the home. iii I~ nmerican's will have some form of deatructive• fire this year. 4 Gcfober 8, 1990 i~iatiunai siaiisiics from the FBI show that: 1 in 3 Californians will experience a burglary or violent crime in their home this year! That is up from I in 4 in 1988. 13~ of all break-ins occur while someone is home or they walk in during the burglary! 50~ of all borne break-ins occur during the daylight hours while people are at work or shopping. 54$ of all burglars ere 17 years old or younger. 3~ are younger than 10 years old! Less than 6~ of all the property is ever recovered. Ta help bring these numbers into focus, quoting from the recently published 6eok, by Tom Heyman, ~NANr1 YERA6EDAY lhe~e 8~e.• 240 cases of arson (or 87,000 per year) 1 1,800 ,4merican homes are burglarized--- (4,307,000 each year) 99 Americans arc murdered (17,885 each year} In the last 5 years more Americans have died in the course of a burglary then were killed 1n the WHOLE 19 years of the Viet-Mom war! Whet can we do to stop this staggering los^,? You Should l~now... Your Chances of Fire Are 1 in 250 Your Chances of Auto Accident Are 1 in 10 `t'our Chances of Burglary Are 1 in 3 • A burglary takes place every 5 seconds • A robbery occurs every 91 seconds e A forcible rape occurs ever: 14 minutes ~ A murder occurs every 33 minutes • A home burns every 55 seconds • A parson is burned every 21 seconds • Afire occurs every 2 seconds Sue Cromwell 8539 Calaveras Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 To {tihom It May Concern: In November of 1989 I had an EMNET ,security system installed after being burglarized three times in less than a year. I was feeling terrorized and fearful for the lives of our five children and ourselves. In February of 1990 we found out that there was an added feature to our basic system that more than pays for itself with just one use. On February 27th at lla.m. I received an emergency phone call from my 6abysitter that my youngest daughter had ialle:i out of the front door and split her head open and that there was blood everywhere. I instructed her to go over to our keypad and press the "A" (ambulance) button and that I would be home in 5-10 minutes since I only worked five miles from my home. By the time I got home not only were the parimedics there but also the police and fire department too. Imagine my panic when I saw six men surrounding my little girl. As they let me t.h rough I saw her. head already bandaged sitting on a paramedics lap smiling, We took her to the hospital where she, got ei.y ht stitches in her forehead. Thank you E61NET, because in these times of latchkey children it's a great comfort to know that help is only a press of a button away. Your Loyal Customer Always, /JC~a )>><c r~ Sue Cromwell Suzie Morris 5618 Carol Ave, Ales Loma, CA 91701 September 10, 1990 Emne[, Iuc. 10532 Acacia S[., Suite 8 Rancbw Cucamonga, CA Y1730 ' To Whom 1[ May Concern: I wanted to take this opportunity to [hank Emne[ from preventing what could have been a total disaster for us and our ne ighbnrhood. In January of this year we had an Emnet security system, including a moni foxed smoke detector installed. On June 18th, we left for work, leaving our two daughters a[ home. AF[er arriving at work, I received a frantic call from ouc daughters, who told me that the kitchen was on Fire, but that they had he a.-d the alarm, saw [I~e flames, and were safe e[ a neighbor's house. 1 immediately left work and returned home. Upon arriving home, I meC with [he members of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, who were finalizing their report. Appareutiy they had never been on a call before f[om a monitored system, because [hey were impressed with the promptness, es compared to a "911" call. They noticed that our next door neichbn r. Rni. r,..,.,..,., uepucy ~n ief of the Foothill Fire Protection Uis trio has an Emne[ system installed in his home, also. As the fire was on an outside wail, iC it had not been contained so quickly, it would have spread to [he shake roof! There would have been extensive damage, plus the possibility of Clie Fire spreading to the other shake roofs Sn the ne lghbo rliood. Again, thank you. Si yely, ~" ~~,.. Suzie Morris Pieter VanderMeijden 2990 Donner Way Riverside, CA 92509 360-0914 Dear Neighbor, We put a monitored security'system in our home back in June because we were concerned about two break-ins that had oc.:urred in our neighborhood. We are very glad that we did because the system has already stopped two attempted break-ins of our own home. The EMNET system was recommended to us by our son Harold, who also has one in his home. We were very pleased that we could have such a good system without spending too much money, and that all the parts have a lifetime guarantee. The installation was beautiful and the crew was very helpful in showing us how to use it. They even vacuumed up after they were finished. EMNET has taken very good care of us and has allowed us to feel safer and more secure in our home. We strongly urge you to talk to them before you are a victim. ~/ Sincerely, 6 00/2I~00 15:11 $1 708 851 9J7J ' other rooms and major areas of rho house. ThLS brought e ti FiNro 1. Detaator s mates of the total cost of protecting a typical' mvuaye pew rl¢- nffiaetly ~MSan, three-bedroom home with ba 197p a°d lBes. semcpt to a range of 5700 to $ j,200, not too much cheaper than today's extimated' costs for home sprinkler protection. ' A scr(es of tests later showed that the power of smoke detecto rs was such that heat detectors were un- necessary far primary protection . The 1974 editloa of NFPA 74 re- fleMed these resulh and epect8xt a more afl'ordable aystem. At about th e same time, Undetwriters laborato- ries Issued th eU UL 217, providing kYen=e s, ramgiea a Consensus approval proroas far the detecors that would fit faro this sim- ~ do sot faehg ' '~ d°~traa "~ mory r pier system,a Bk.N ro aovy 6om, Even though the tecbsaltsgirai the ndn of t6oaat t6 . td¢6 rmc of , ' ^ >aad engineering de- ~~y yy dd bm ~d ~ s fmidiea .t a req ntsforeWghly.atfpsd- eble borne detector aystem wero to peace by the mid-1970x, !here was stl11 a problem of tdsi6!(tty. Public ssrvtoe annotmoemenb promcang detectors were generslly scheduled to run on televtsioo et 1:00 am..1!• most no one was awake to cee these announcements, and to those years almost nc ere had detertnra wM,.. ever, the pmblem v¢nished when Amerlrsn manufacturers saw that the new technologies and standards had created a major new market and 6egen aggressively adverGsing de. rectors. Prime-tiaae pitches by sash remgnfzable talenh as WtWam Con- rad end Danny Thomas, combined w(fh attractive pricing, packnging, and afore display, made the dlffer- enro. Detector sales for 1975 were more than double those for 1974, and the 19751evela were tripled in 1976. Py 1977, orly u^ oerrpnr nF.~r~nd- enb to • oetimu! survey did w! imow that Rre deteelon were avail- eblefor home Rre protection. Nwly !wise that number had already equipped their 6omea? ~.s BkMrd C• Brsgh4 'aeceet Advanest to aa4dentW Smoke Drtatfon,' nee rove. tins., Val. 67, No, a (NOVemkr 197q. PP• e0-T7. r Ae,nPaae Carpontbn, Survey and Arulyrfr o/ OxupanhfnaW!/a64 Smoke De• fambn, Wutd„Oon, D.C„ 1071, SS'S'fGl7 SENSOR '-~~,_~ fdl 00J u~ ae w b n,... re / '• is e T._ Up 40 MMi-4 ;rrr r> ~ Nnl y, Figure 1 shows the remarkable growth !a detector coverage during the peat dec0da sad a half: The year: 1977, I980, and 1984 are those in whirls the US F1re Admtn!stration (USFA) conducted national surveys. The growth fn coverage before 1977 was eatlmeied using mantd'acturen' vey RA 1985 Louie HanL poll pro- vides the Lnmt benchmark; 74 per.• cent of US housebolds now have .detecton.s Clearly, the detector er• ~r,i^'Ip,: ,y uirviiaiian °""' Yed at the tiro ProteMion improvement ofour time. ~ IMd,i @Irkk and [~vaip, Inc., A Defeo- for M gory OfMrHonw Aaavtu afa Surtey of Smakr and Fin Daheror Owen; ran At. tort, DrePand far r„d.,.l e.,...,-__. ,.-_ Ire., I980)it4NdanlWSmokraMFln Da~#e sor Coarser to rM Uefsrd Stapr; Flndtngi Pram a tPSS Sarory, PB &1.IIASaS, N.tlonJ Taa6aW1 Wnmauon 6rrvIM WuMsuton. D,C., 19aJ. a Dm agmy,'Mort of Ur Wor4 Nardn ro 0e Haald,y,' USA Today, Maya, IOaS, p, u. The S-shaped curve found In Fig- ure 1 [s the pattern that is usually sees when a sew product enters the popvlatlon. ARer ao INtlal spurt, Ilse pmwth rate of ruck a product usually levels out as all the households that have been acid on the product so- quire it. Note that thb b whe!!a hap ~SnNng with detector. From 1977 fti 1984 ooverage went itom 89 to 07 t percent, tmd to as addltlotul e(ae percent rd'Asnericap households wet ' Pmteckd each year. Fmm t98f to 1954, however, the annual increase ' fn protection was only 3,5 percent of AmeMcan households. The rate of growth In defector oovetage bbegln- Nog~ to slow, even though we have not sun out of homes to protect, If ehis trend eootlauea, the tnarkat r could. became saturated, from the manufacturon potnt of view, end at1U leave one family In flue unpro• f !acted. lcdaed, maaufacturon may think Ilsae rho market Is eetureted al- ready. How long hat It i - that both dwellings and apartmedts hu retrofitted in at least some situe- tinns.' ~• struction was the first category of housing covered by mandatory de- tector law; in a high porcentage of states and localltles.a Similarly, Figure v shows that apartment occupants, who used to have a much lower rate of detector ownership than dwelling occupenla, now have a nearly equal rate. This is because the sector of res(dential properties most heavily covered by mandatory detector laws after new mnstrvetion was existing multi-fam- Ily housmg.10 The various detector laws are sum- maraed In Ftgurea 6 and 7. OC muse, no simple figure can ade• quntely capture the pattern ofdetec- tor legtslntion. Stow Taws are mod- ified by local laws, and them Is considerable variation ro require- ments from ono place to another at Loth levels. Whate more, new laws are still nnioo n .mod ....i,... Inenih. With that said, we con ecc striking diR'erences in the breadth and depth ° Aerorpiv.E Corporation, Survey and Analyr4 of Ccevpnnalmtallabk Snnka Da• IaRbn; Elrank xnd L.fdge, Ire., A Orleasor en Ewry Other Iyomu Mruln of a Survey of Smokr and Flrs Drsrcbr Owncn; PuR Re. part; Ru(dentinr Smoke and Fin D<brtw Caaerogr In she Unnrd Sfater: Flndingl from a sP49 Sunxv, Pa Al-I lagyS, 1O Ihld. of ~requirmente beM•een 1877 d~tectosf~ a~`OOiI°f0 r. . mentrhttd%titoppsd to 19! S&tan 1 atatee made the fnatallatlon of smoke detector to new re4dentlal wn1 strvcUon mandstory and required Detector Etfec6vcness the USFA's National Fire Inci• t dent RepurNng System (NF1RS) hm a hero usr.J to estimate the risk of ~, dying in homer that have detector,. as well as those that do uot. ~ylpsE asuch~analysnsestlmatedhat 1 .cut the risk of deadt'fn 1u1fj Tlut fa, • a person who has a home fire and does nvt iiovc a datCCt°r I$ twsce B9 likely to die !n that fire es another person who suAers the same fire but is protected by detectors. This twos to-one trio has stood up with littler or nu Variation a1ncC it W 05 firt C:dCU- r toted Fnrm 1979 NE1RS data.1II The reason for the large impact of f detectors ctn fie seen lu Figure 8,t which shows the relationship be- I tween delayed discovery and the riskf Iof dying In dwe111nQ flrra that occur I a °Aulhnr't wmmarlmion afsNt=rtquln mrnte listed In "gta;e Smoke Detoetor Ru- t gnlremenh,"7hr 1.454 FInAlmoroc(Quincy, Mvec: tJFPn, 1993); nod unpublhhxd IfM1 Ieglvlalive update Ly BAl( ElatmNn. Report fo Canq.erl on Firs Pmbcsbn $yrfems; Ddecton, flemoll Alorm aydema, and apnnalerr, p. u; )oho R. Halh Jc,'Flre Polk Aneumrnt Modelling at KB$-; unpub• Ilsh=d NFPA anilyru of Iptl2 data Gam the Nannnal k ire fncidem Reporting $ynem, prc• t peed far tLu Feder) Emergency Manago- meat Agenry~. dO s FlftE JOVRNAL~$EFTEMBER 19$S bee nearly <yualled that o(dwzllings. r ~~ October- S, 1990 During an interview on 20/20 tvro burglars who claimed responsibility for breaking into over 900 homes, stated that when they saw a home with a monitored security system 'THEYPAS5ED /TBY~' 4v'hen asked, the crooks, rated security measures in order of effectiveness: LEAST EFFECTIVE 6. PERMANENTLY MAP,KIFdG VALUABLES WITH OWNERS ID 5. LIGHTS OPd AN AUTOMATIC TIMER -. DEADBOLTS ~..,,.r . „~ ..r~C..~7':E 3. DOGS IFd THE HOME 2. PRIVATE SECIJP.ITY PATROLS I- MONITORED SECURITY SYSTEMS WITH POLICE DISPATCH Haw do criminals react when they encounter a monitored home security system? 32.4$ ...................GO TO ANOTHER NEIGHBORHOOD 41. 1~ ...................FIND ANOTHER TARGET IN 7HE SAME AREA 7.3~ ...................FIND A WAY TO SCORE ANYWAY i9-2R..... _F1?~D A WaY TO SCORE AT 1Y.E SAME I.DUSE AT A DIFFERENT TIME ( Source USA TODAY) A Consumer Education Feature by Securilg Distributing & Marketing Magazine Police, Insurance Firms, Alarm Users Believe in Home Security Systems A professionally installed alarm does more Lhan help discourage bur- glars. It can detect an intruder's break-in attempt, somrding an ear- splitting alarm. And it even can sig- nal the break-in to a 24-hour moni- iuring sucion, whose operators wfii call policy immediately. Between 1979 and 1981, the police department in Scarsdale, N.Y. tracked home burglaries. Out of 5,000 houses, 860 were burglarized. Ot Lhe homes that CeII victim, 90 percent did not have alarm systems. Of the remaining 10 percent, the alarm systems at the time of the crime either were not turned on or they were incomplete systems. The Scarsdale homes without security were approximately four times more likely to he burglarized. Ina 19&3 nationwide survey, Se- curity Uistributiry; & Marketing magazine found that 99 percent of home-alarm owners believe the alarms that ;tai:d g,:ari over their homes and families are effective, and 98 percent would recommend a home alarm Lo others. :m wouiu puii~e. In q 1984 survey of U.S. police chiefs, by Security Distributing & Marketing 89 percent said they would recommend a burglar alarm to someone concerned about thwarting a home burglary. Belief in the reliability of Mane alarms doesn't stop with steno own- ers and police officials. gave m loeuraoce blsurance com )enies long have of- fered premium miscounts on hane• owners insurance for residences pro- tected by burglar alarms. They know that a home with eu alarm Is less Irkely tab? L+urg!sxi>_ed. The formula is simple: fewer bmak-fns means fewer costly claims. They offer the biggest discount fur alarm systems hooked up to a round-the-clock mOnltoting atatlop. Burglary slstistics are high, too high. But you don't have to be n victim. You con remin your peace of mind by protecting your family and your home from burglary with a pro- fessionally installed alarm system. Home Security Systems Do Their Job Well ' ,4E~ 3'rr.'~''iry y' ': i t ~tCJ,e~ f~ :'t+ 99% not : elledwe ' AUrm owners were asked: How elleclrve do you Ihink homo DurBler alarms ere' aou¢a; Becunly aislr,pulin86 Merhelinp ~, j maperlne, I9B8 ~. Home burglar alarms work eo well that 99 percent of alarm owners bay that 6ecuriLy syetema me effective. Police Recommeod Home Alarms OID88, Secunty Uisnibuthlg & Marketing, Cahnera Publishing Co. s ) I Arrr J a9% yeS 17` ~ Prlice were asketl: I Woum you recommend a burglar I alarm system to someone concerned alwul Dmglary9 ~ Source: Secmrly OislnOvllnq 6Ale•FeOrp I I me0arine, 1981 Police know that alarms help atop burgtore from tweaking into homes, w the vest majority recommend their lue. Insuran<:e Companies Hnow that Alarms Work Compare Premium Dlacouots OfTered + 2 $ ~ = o~ _ a S ~ ~~I = I company %e Xe M@ Se ' 8e - ~e Ee E~' ~R+. l name ~ - S o- o S_ uo Ia8 0 ' ncL-a Lao s ca;ualry' S 6 10 lG is l0 to ?0 All$IOIB insurance' S 5 10 10 15 10 10 15 ' GNA Inswance' ? 2 ? 3 ~ 6 5 10 Commercial llnion ? ? ? 3 B 10 5 5 la ' Gontinenlal lnsvrance 2 2 2 3 0 fi 5 5 10 i ' Grvm BFOrsmr 2 ? Z 5 5 to 10 10 ; j Fnrmsm Firo Insurance 2 ? ? J 3 6 5 5 10 ; '. Flremon's Fund Insurance t 2 1 a 6 12 ) r 15 Government Employees In; •t ~ ) 10 10 10 ?0 10 10 YO ~ '~ Tne Nanlnrtl Casually' ? ? / ) ] td 10 10 A I ' Kemper Corp • 2 ? ? 5 5 l0 10 10 A Pmtlenliel Properly a -- - ~ ~ _ _ _ i - r 13 10 r0 13 aeleco Inrvrence ~ 2 ~ v a 5 . Sla:e farm' 2 Z ~ 1D 1n 10 10 m 15 Tronsamenca' 2 5 ] 10 10 IS f0 m 15 i 4evelers Insurance' 2 Z 2 5 5 5 10 10 10 ' Utica National 2 ? ? 3 0 6 5 5 10 Zuncn Am¢rkan ? ? ? 0 0 6 5 5 10 I Sourm: Srcunry PsurAUrinR 6 MarkeenR mare ~! me I •xn vr<mwm numuin oner,n „u ,,, ~, ma,rr. •e~m .nn ee.ad,lu. ore e.~,,,r ~une r, .nn:a r.mero,ec •nrx,u er •raom , Hismle mr.anui,md veJll,. IHom .ek Ixel hmFler elan w ~~ nF al l emnr , en am ,: Omr pr o wl i m e .. reds . ' e,na ,:imirrdreme. po6ea.ns la.l 6vrel,r .arm o~. u tiro md anor e mrPm reai els %credi l. You may be able to save money on your homeowner's insurance policy when you imlall a burglm end/or fire alenn syaLem. Batteries Kili Smoke Sensor Use The National Fire Protection As- news about smoke detectors nd bad The good news is that smoke de- tector use in the United States rose in 1987 to four-fi (ths of all homes, according to an NFPA rel,ort, "11.S. E:gserience with Smoke lletectnrs:' The bad news is !hat in roughly one-thi«i of these homes, the detec- tors don't work. 'T'his means that more than one-fourth oC rll Ameri- con homes have non-operational smoke detectors, Power-source problems, espe- cially dead and missing batteries, ore the main reason Cor nonwork- ing smoke retectors, according to the study. "Ueod batteries probably reflect site IaCk Of fCj,^aiai tesl,l llg Nr!d Itlaln- tenance, while missing batteries may rcllect a wirJer range of prob- lems, including frustratinr, over nui- -^ ,, ore report says. ~Someuhomes with smoke d6tec- tors still are at risk because of im- proper installation. 1997: Alarms in 2Q% of Nomes One In five U,S, hones will have -Leper n[( bocause the Inrgnr pcrcenL- a security system by 1997, predicts age of penelrntion will mobs it more a study Crom Find/SVP of New difficult to find new buyers, the re- York, "ThC Mnrkefs for Nome Se- port says. entity and Energy Management 4l rncever. Ure larger number of Systems." Roughly 7 percent now protected homes will create a "solid have an alum'. replacement tnnrket....to sustain As the nruket begins to mnlure ^nit sales growt.h;' according to the in Lhe 1'JOOs, new installations will study. %d;:; -~ Prediction: Nome Alarm Inroads foY 1990s' ' 19aP '` 790] 1992 '1997 IU 5 PoPUlalmn (in m Ikons) '" ' 1 ~ 203 ~ ~:',~ 25J : .• '. (.'' 1232 r.,l'i 9' ",,6263 ~U;$,~housoholds (In millions) ~' ~; ?~~i•1•,, 04 r ~'~'t 9U ~- ',y~l','%~gT';';~ tOq 'ily syslems,in use tin Ihousands)~ 2 OTO ' '~', 6 240 r. ? 13,50n 21,000 1ty~syammsper'10U houesholtls ~~~k'k '3.4 ~~ ~Uq `^ 13,9. ~fMF4Meb MIN rH Bfxurlry NOE Mane .20.2, nf`VY Oe,mM Srflom; p.4D/S VP, IPBB ' Penelralion of the U. S, home alarm market wit! approach 14 percent by 1992 and 2U percent by 1997, says a new study. Dealers Move in r On CCTV Market„ ,' ' ~ ~7a%• CCN gametes 73% CCTV monitors , ~ • 70% syslem ' t ex% Card access systems' "" ` ~ , aZ% ImBICOm Sy9IBm9 ^ .1, , ® r', ~nr'sw.~l lel 57% i:.. Nnypatl entry By6tems ~ , . ~ 5T51 !t Card readors as% . ~a,~,~eyyee avicess aevrcas ®JS% ' Telephone entry comrols ~ ~ ' ® 24% Mechanical high-security lacks ® 16% °ilm end tape camores t3% 'arking control equipment ~T% .I rumsliles ~ t^~ n,nsiiences i, 'Percent of tloalars seIlln9hnetelllnB• .I Total excce45 100 pamenl due la ' mull pis losponsas. Saur[a 19B9.1[roef CMlm'Mnbl nµgl dp ~ gnomon F„a a More alarm dealers soil and Install CCTV equipment today then any other type or access control equipment, ec• cording to a 1909 study by J.P. free man and Cp., Newtown, Conn., of 110 security dealers. Intercoms ere ae popular as card syslents. 1) My cb 01i azi air O/i os r oe r an os 1 Autuel lBBY ___ .......... ..... Far,.. uonn¢rons and trends A check on business ac(lvity o/ 50 dealers Indicates w .... ..........._~ with highest revenues average 30 jobs monthly. q$'1 iUe 851 9518 SI'STE9 SESSnR ~uUS ~+Ulti One of the Most Remarkable Fire Protection Success Stories of Modern Times is the Widespread Adoption of 17etectors ~. by American Households, A Decade of Detectors: Measuring the Effect Joffiv s. r1Alt, JA, The scary of Are detectors in the Vnited Smtea govt beak a long way. In fact, fire detectan for residential use have been around since 1921, when heat detectors were Arse intro dewed. This type of detector wa< the only Lend available untll the aaid- Jobe R }(aU. Ph.D„ 4 DbaGOr of the NFpA'a Pen AoJyus Dlvitko. 1960s. when Vt« ~ahn~. !cries approved and Bated a aiagle• statlon resideat4l amaka deteMar. Nezt came the btt6Ety-powered single-atation amolm detsctor, iatro- duceri in 1970. t Thts tnnawtion set the sage lot widespread deterror s lbae a~stoeas w acted Tv RkLa.d W. Bulnwdd aad l,. - .. G Zuum/rw+a, Kovaeboid WeaOe{ Fen Probe elan 6andboeF, iJeb tbo (Qaiuy, Mm: NPPA, meU, Pa 1g-10. use, but there were dill a number of noo•technologigl barriers to ovcr• come. The Srrt such barrier waf the high core of complete detector pntection for the typical home. As late to 1972, NFPA 74, Standard for tl.a Irutalla- tion, Maintenance, and Use of Horuehold Ffre Warning Equip- ment, not only dictated smoke dete~- ton outside of all sleeping azeas but also eaAed for beat deeectars to all pa~20%A ~~ ~a:~l 'B'1 708 fi51d 91~- STSTEll SESS_OA X099 ~+018 ,v.w.v..,~ ~ _ - ~~~ • other rooms and major areas of the housa'[his brought estimates of the mGl mst of protecting a typical three-bedroom homewith basement m a range of 5700 to SI,200, not tin much cheaper than today's estimated costs for home sprinkler protection. A series of testa Liter showed that the power of smoke deletion was sorb that heat detecmrs were on- neurssary far primary protection. The I974 edition of NFPA 74 re- fieciea then resul6 and specified a mdse affordable syatem. At about the same h'me, Underwriters Iaboran-,- rfes issued their UL 2IT, providing a mnsencus approval pmceas for the detectofs that would St Into this sim- pler ays•~m.e Even tbaugh khe technokfgical brakthrougha and engineering de- sign requirements foe a highly afford- able home detector system were in place by the mid-1970s, there was sti)< a problem of visibility, Arb4e service announa~menis promoting detector were generally scheduled to stsn on televisum at 1:00 am. Al- mWt n0 one was awake to see these annotmaments, and fn those years .t_ _ . ~., - -- ~ ~ ueie.:iura. l:loW- ever,~tbe problem vanished when American tnanufsaiirers saw that the oew technolog[es and standards had created a major acw market and begin aggressively advet+,stag de• lectors. Prime-time pitches by such remgtfzable talents se William C:en- rad end Darcy 'lhoiuaz, mmbfned with alhactive priciog, paclGgirig, and store display. made the diEer• acre, DeMctar sales for 1975 Were mom lion rtoubk those for 1874, and the IB75 [erveis were eipled in 1976. ny i47i, m!ty ~ ~ e~..~a a.°r' opund- ents to a national sttvey did not koow that (ixe detectoti were avail- able forhome fire protection. Nearly lwia that number lud already WutPPcd their homes.a s~-- ~. Bt1(L~4 "Ramie Mva~t fe ~ ~~ ~ N~ a~rMOo.' aur: foot trfQVtWkYf 1974), [R- ~ aaraJaM/e~u~.,,~~~~ ~r~ry ~ anatad' ~I ~--`-Y~^.-fasfapu6G aTNy AM area... w. ~.c,1ar~. laare 1.~~Devb'ryryet((ar atfimtky beMrpn- l970 avd 1961 t~ ties m?~ ~a ••---- .. ---_-- .: deloeNn an mesa w11 ~~ro o~afivm roJ nysaltga rsskof ~ x ~~iGSnmthatm~ ~ s0 i ,t b b ~ so ~ ,... s. .: Figare 1 shown the retnerka}7te gmwdt la detector mvetage dstring the pest decade aad a 6elE The yea.~s 1977, 2980. aad 1982 are those iA whla4 the US Fire Admitilsaation (USFA) cdnducted mtloml surveys, The growth is coverage 6efare 1877 was esthnLLed tLhtB manufectssref% sales figures fac[nded in the first sar- vey.E A 198.5 F.nsiia Karlin po11 pro- vides the laoeat benchmark: 76 per- cent of US househoIda now have de~~te"~c'tors,e Clearly, the detectr ps. p.va,pn U uAG~lallOagEd u the lim protection fmprovemeatofoar time. W to & Hadt6y,~llS,1~'tUe Worlr NLdsr u °dwr,'"'r9,tans,w ~r^ ,w uu .... _. _ . u ..~., The S-shaped curve found in Fib= ore 1 is the pattern that is usuall+ seen when a new product eaten the population. after an fnftiel spurt, th< growth rate of such a ptudnct usuaAy levels out az all the households that have been sold on the product ac. quire ft. Note that this s what Is hap. penirgwzth deteetora, From 1977 to ~, eovenge went from 22 m E7 percent, and so as add(tiotsal nine percea! oFA.aenrtin houuholds was pmtec'.yd L«:b year. Ftvm liASg rn 1984, however, the annual iacreaze is pmtectioa was only 3,5 percent of Amedwn households. The cote of gmwds to detectorooveraga le begin- ning mstow, even though we have not run out of homes to protect, Htlsia trend continues, the market mold become saturated, from the a+wutxturees point of view. and still leave one Emily is five unpin Ceded. indeed, maaafW3uten may think that dre market is saurated al- ready. How long bar it beta since pB.:V~9o 15:1: $1 iG5 951 8915 SI'STG)t SEX50R iiiV'~~lu ,w ~.. ~__, _._.~_- .a -, ~ I as ra i w~ ~I ~ ~:, I ",~ i sa ~ i rv'~ i w~ I L nw nu a.... n.w.r rte! www,.r '~ re y w-; I to ti {~ w iJ ~ w-k f >e~ sn l ~,r.w~" °'1'- r-- ---r------.---~ tln +rri nb uw fB, ,NS .e.,w n,.. r.•. ,wasa. yw saw a telcvisien ad for smoke de• teetort7 Who Aas Detectors? The funnies that do not install de- tectors are much m¢m likely to be drawn from the ranks of those drat have a high risk of dying in fire, as Figure 2 shows. In fact Heady every ldentl6abla high•riak gaup has lagged behind 1n obtakning detector coverage 2bese groups include the poor. people who d;d xt EuisL }S_eTl :cowl, end the eidedy. Interestingly eawgh, the gap in coverage Lot not gown. From 1977 m 1982, for example, detecwrs were installed in roughly the same per- xntag~ of poor households ru more d9uamt Louscholds, although the stating point seas lower' for poor Lousebolds. 6lderfy households x- Nally Closed their gap witL the gea- Ctal pt7pu1ati0n. t7n ChE ¢ShEC head, n, iI ~ ~ nC Figwr 3. i6e per. aatatt of rryo:ted ere. m uouseholds luving deacon bas Ugged 1>oL;„d ;Le percev+ge o: all iwwehvldrlhetFav< d=4~vrs. F1gwe 1, New Lower Save Sad a hlgLerlavelofmver ores thin 1wc,es in Smrr°t artte 1a71, Nut have faDen behtad Intely.° The mdse wLrerabie and most poorly covered group fn dre popula- tion is simply the group of people wLa have fires. Figuro 3 shows that the pemeabge of reported fires in households egWpped with detectors Ls, legged PardxrandbztLerbshind Use percentage of oll households equipped with detectorrs. In 1988, less than oce reported home fire in four occurred in a home that had de- tCtorS~r Pa:'. of Ch;: paitera cosy bf. mis- leading beauee households with de- lectors aro more likely to defect fires early and m eztln$vish more of their fires without fue deparhnent help, This mean that more of rhea fires CArvaraean, sorcery and f~rrXaywE f[ fan o r. mrr fn Eery Orhm flans' RaoW of a Sarwy of Swab aKi Pks Daraor Own; Full Ra- purr; RrddmHal Snnls end Pus Deraaor Coaraga m t1r,VNUd Stela: FhdNp from may gu unreported. The Size of thts effent it cnknnwn, but the 3935 Coa. Sumer Yroduc: Safety Commiss;c,-, (CPSC) study of unreported nnres sbonld tell :n more when it is com- plete. Pending Ulnae results, Fig::rc 3 reveals in the most powerF~l possi- ble terms the `act :hat many of the people wLn teed deteCna most still do not have theta. TurWng to groups not show-a rn Fsaure 3, the Sout7y has Ghc lowest level of detector coverage o}' any re- giion in the country. In 1962, it lagged seven percentage points be- hind the Vaitcd SFates u a whore With jnst 69 percent Wverage. TLis is psrtlculat'ly troubiesoae becatuc tLe South also Las tk:e highest fire death rate per capita of all regieas cf the GOnntry. thher groups pot shown in ESew:e' 3 include married people, mobile home owners, aad smokers. Being married made a perso¢ more likely !n have a detector, bur having cLil• Urea m:dE nn real a;Scrence. ?vioblle home houaeholds Lad roughly 8C percent coverage in 196g, a very high Irvrl tt.,. r_~°,,,;.`.r reuecII tde im- pact of she Deparh¢ent of Sousing and Vrban Development's 3976 eoc- struction staadnrd tLat requires de• lectors in newly NuQt moL4c homes. And, Lorseholds w;th s;nekers were no more or less likely m have deter tors Ulan were nonsmoking house- Nofds.a As Figure 4 mveals, Louseholds in relaively new homes have had higher ievefs ofonvenge than house- holds In genetwl sirme the defector boom began, This probably re6ects 'wc fact i=3t n-.~' rEniuential con- r Atyort ro Cnnere+< on Fire Proraetlon Surtemr: Deteclare. ennota Nam: Surtem+, amlyru o<1982 daM from the b'adonol Flu 7nrui¢! [bp+rting Snm,a. Paaa.'Cd 5r kc Federal Emarrirncy Maaagertwat Aaen.Y~ a Aaidn:a'al Smo4a and Fu* Ikswtcr Comeau fn the Ur~ire6 Stour: Findings figm o - Pa ~nl: u1ti O9: ^.C: 9^ 15:19 „-'6_'1 70A S51 P973 51'STE)1 SE~SGR 9e .~ ac ~. v a^' 'v 6c 50 a 'c ~a a~°, Se ze to a eae 5. Datecmr <mertga d apaRments nudY equalled rErt oFdwelling,. sWctfoa was tl+e Ent sateyory of housing coveted i9y mandatary de- tedor laws in a high percen;age of states and loznlitic~,a Sfmllarly, Figure 5 show; that apactmeat Oecupen L-, ~o used Co have a much Iowa+ rate of detector ownership than dwr]ling oCCVpsa6. uuw iuve a nearly edua! rate. Ttis is bemuse the sector of residential properties most heavily Covered by mandatory detector laws aQer new const+vction was existing multifam- ily houstng.10 TLe various detector laws stn scm- marized in Figures 6 and 7. Of course, na simple figure Csn ade- quately capturo the pat3ern bfdat<c- tor Iegisiation. State laws are mo 1- i&ed by local laws. emd there is considerable variation in regvirr- maats 5om oue place to another =_t nth lovels. Wnati mote, new laws are still being payed nexly everl• month. With that said, we can tae striking di8'erences k the breadth end depth a Carpa,Woo, Saray and AmWN+ al0uuvunbGuWIe54~ Smab Da. taatzoa: EIAdt and [avldae, [ae.,, A MM.ie. 4 Sorry Odwr Hone: Aarvar of a Surrey of 3mpY and Fur Der~dor Otune+: fuQ Re. wra; Ratdanas 5mmH sled Fun Daew+et Cawrytr N rat unwd srdw: Pt.dugs/roc. . rgpa~sa,ra, rn aslteeas. Ywf t`~ of regturemeata between 1877 aid 1983, la 1977, 31 states had no smoke detector requirements at aII For dwellings and apargneats. Only three sates requhcd detectort in both new construtnfea and some existing homes. both dwe7lfags and aaartmenk. 1}y 1983, the ntunber ofstates with uo home smoke defector requ'ue- mentr had dtnpped to 13. Sixteen states made thn iastallatlon of smoke detectors is new residential mn- stsuctioe mandatory and required .~ , '1- ;F.zt bo::t rwe!!ings and xpartr;erts be re:rofi;tcd !n at !ei,t sor.•r. situn- tinnS.~' Au~h~r's>ur~n,uwa .a cCstue reGc'~c ,r.¢an 11td ,'^. -Sh;e 3':. Ke DcteGO: ac~ cuircmentt,"7he 1950 fb.. A«auru:c(Quincr, seen.: NFPA, 198a;; sad ecoubuchrd tai iegpiacve update by 3AK ~le<froda. s R~yort :a Cor~grcre on Fire 2rota'non Syeens: DeteCan, P.enotr AL-rm Sya.e>ra, and SprLi.FLra, P. 8; fov, :L HaL'. Ic., -FLt R!sk Asaeea;nrut ,V,odei;io6 at \35-; uFlth• ;tihec NfPA s~aSYSS ot!~ dnta :'Gm ;he tiauona Ftrc Inddeat tiepm9egSyHem, pfb pvxd for the Fed-:J Eneigexy .V,anaae. Went Agenry. eta d._ In lYfle ttaaorywx enitar had ra petmtor E2ectivenezs 09-'.Il. po 15'.1 $1 SU eon ¢iidnisda azsd 6~OG sm ~ 5 551 U378 I---~~ n. Fhc number of deaths per I ' yes wa; more than twee c. Krea; _ _discocerv !Doti ^rc- 'h 3U 1 ' :es u it was whey, discovcrv x- 3 iv less than .i0 mi~utes.10 A r NFPA study estimated ;het ~ 3 rceat of dwelling fire fatali:ice - en 8:00 m and b.00 stn occur a s t}laf to more that 20 rain- ~ d tdiscoverandthatfull 3& er- s I kcur jn fires that t ce mare 0 minL•teY to7c iSCOVe:. eta ~ n z tvm a study by the [nteaationa[ As- sadatla¢ ofFire Chiefs (IAFC; Foun- datina indicate that defecwrs gave the Erst notice of Ere is 61 percent of fires whet, everyone was ssleep but in only 34 percent o£Rres when at lout ane per50n aa-as awake.l5 pelayed discovery, typically as- soviatedwith £rtL; t}at occur at night when everyone is asleep, also ;ends to be ch,,,^teris5a of the smoldering 6tes caused by discarded smokdng materials. These smoldering Ryes are the leading causes of L'S fire fatalities and detectors are ideally desigved to deal with them. Detectors have had muth!ess im- 1p'La+A Civan w M1utomohc F4c Dceu- tbn (or Fiousehckls,' Fi rr, ~'ol. i9, \'o. 9SE u [.acs tk ~ Fatal Fim .a Ameriai," rus locavn4 Vcl, i3, So. 5 !$epte: •ber 191, pp. G.r-Ge. Rvgr[ fc Caageu r.. Ftrc i rotr~:fo,r SYIIFna.~ DNectora, (fmpla Aieml $VS:CRH, aaw Sprinklm, p. 5. S1'S'IEA 5[S5;'~!i 0 pact on injuries and property damage than they have bed tm fire deaths. aaalysls ust¢g 19Et 1VFII15 data iatliraMS that ftfftCrS Wt wre ex- vi3e. t! fohu R. Kn14 fr.,'lire 1~itF A.[sen-,tae Nodellirs at h~5.' Fipare B. ':he mvmk; otdaths pet 1CC ~-e. oavrrin8':<Meeo aildaipht aed y.yp am ~.:1 pok moro : ha,: thin}' minute :o diswver ups more clean tw,c that cf these teat took ius thaw thirty niauMa IP dixmer- ~s•C53p¢tentjal vicFm eztr-a time to escape injury. On the other hand defCC!Ori rt13y [lVf;`i ~hf ErP u[ ~~Ch- an carry :cane dut the orcunavt is enwuraeed to tn• tc R~ t it. Tnis may, in h m, lead to ar, injury that crowd no` have oceu.:d with s Luger, mete obvrous:y unmWna~e- able fi-e. Despite ~he Iarge ..^•.:.a<ued s.`act of dMec;or, on home fte S'suties, ;he aoh:al 1 erne fro teach rte de• cliae3 fairly slowjy during she depde of rapid growth uc detector owrc:- stip. The mist likely reason Rr. ~Yi discrepancy was noted ea.-lien- 1. relatively slow ,s`~uwth in :epar;ed fires octi^urric; in hones p: otected by detectars._Ir, order to xa!iu thy. large savinCS of life of w?rich detrc- in:_s ue ceyai:iu~we must lend a ~+a~ to phlce deteMnn in thy. hs; Dye fourth o4'Amer(can hnu.sr!bnlds teat ~nnt have th r:m. ----" Detrtors .n ovary bonschold would also have a la.~e jmpatt on the other method chosec to protect these househoks. If the entire mua- try were arotec'.ed by e~ lectors, the aced foe othe• more eapemive borne Rye arotetion o lions wo d .b~rttduaed becwse the atua r of people at risk smuld be lower, If -de >Se NlrtWaa Unt¢ IXacevary - 6asb Jraa • U9~2G~an 15:15 $1 i05 551 0.ii3 SI'STEA SESSUR • - .'E'~e13+Ulti Cewer people were killed, d7ea fewer comprehensive iartn7ati would remain to be saved. onzir.aform I4 is encou:na ng to seta that n:i- fLat w as easier to undetstand.1 .4n analysis done at the tiational TLexe changes Lave been uite s B ' ° s..ace nlarms are. cted Lv only two q ureau o tan ac- percent of those v~;huct dr.:ectors as BS) s eer:Ssl, beca,ue every rarvev since area>un fo: net bu~i::c them. Iluw. that detectcrs ~ e c+aablc oC saving lien Las found f i l a a r y smail e-a 3Y perc~ant oCthose who die in ho e rate m the mounting and placemen Hres, wLreaLome snl noisier rv t r evur, detector nnnov ;ors uo lend to t sro:ry more abou uisu cc al s e of detectors ,1,he IAF'C Foundatlon uit to meet the requirements of for instance found that of th d _ : arms , ~th.n u~n,crs do. Si, sp'percen: nfron• NFPA I3D, SS¢ndardfor rha Instal- J ri , , e eter tors it checked, 92 percent were m: - owns,-s sae that de:ecm;s rc o7 too - c ° ` a on of Sprinkeer Syseems in One- and Tvu•F¢mi( D (1 :: .en or when you dolt went tic;:; reedy located and 94 percent were tc." my 27 e ^; enr ~ y iae ings ¢nd Montle Homes, mold save anotlrer30 . o tec'tnr mrreetly LasWled, 13e same study cwn .rare, f d l ffi percent, In other words, detectors oun f at improper location r Mere se: io prob:ems rose !>r mocntiag -sere the pmbl~ ' and rinkle:s t sp oged7er mold reduce ms a roughly ooe•thhd of the ras ti mmtng in the areas of testing and the home firo deakh rate to less than a fifda its eu;reat sire but mo t f es whsrlr detectors did not function maintenance. .Ls detectar nwnersL:p Lss spread, the percearage oEowne:s , s o that reduction cavtd Le achieved 7 erl when tes wading to nn- wanted fires One repo-,a:,g tLat tt ev test t.4cir dear ~ wit 'ust a electors, Sprinklers would have a mu ter ff t , o an - teed s -Y ~0°Q error rate tspretry8~!- . tors month.} Fns dropped, from 4S percent ir, 19r^, mkt xrcent in 1950 e ec than detectors on In j and prop- Another problem tlast can be con. signed tc the past is t17e short li d b 40 percent in 1982,v LrndouLt- d arty damage, so that the reduction m the tote[ nu b £d - ve scare regarding the radiation heard e ly, tLis underestimates the orb_ lam, Lerausc roan} of those who er a m eaths, ia• juries, and damage achieved by add- fram tonfmtion-type detectors. Ma• joc analyses including a C re- port fregurrt resting arc or.]ytesting h l iag sprinklers to detectors would , orium- ers L'aioa study is I871 and a CPSC t e a arm buzzer througL ;hc ter bnCO t L probably be greater than the reduo report is 1980, have shown that tLc n, no G e detection ~: i bans that detectors a]oae mold achieve in those three areas mm- radiation from toniaatioa detectors adds tittl t a sm. Regulsr mafatenance orour. ~~~~ biped, e o normal bau)sgt'ovnd radiation and dues net est ms` a iL less Geouend ;San m Y -sEU:e. i`ro IAFC Of course, any assessment of the : ao e to public Ledth Foundatlca sYudv found attractiveness of a home fire pmtec- tlnaoption like residential inkl s , Ntdunee alarms ore a more n ag- i b percent ofdetectnrs had working bat- tcries or other woridrrg power, bet ers pr .. lem. F.N:...,~d. ,.r_..:...._.. s ns t7m ,r.. ... , . ss uxery m ne mkteadingly favorable ff it fails to tape aemunt of drn e t r e7arm rates v wide] .- _-,~w ~rY Y. but have d ...`: '•''" .wnu anal power mterryp. lions, prfrna_tily due to dead bat• a 8 reduc;ioa In deaths that might be range as IligL az 1.6 alarms net household per year Ev th b antics, were at fault :n nearly twc- l acLicved a[ aurli Iawer oust through , ea e est estimates show more than 10 nut- c ues of the Cates in wh~ci deter:cot fr l d ; an iatenative program aimed at un[- antral detector rotection i1 \BS sans alara7s for every signal of a real u e o operate prooe~ during a fire, ,~/any Ere serW.o; experts a.c p . 7e analysis shows, for sample., that a fir„ TLe good news is that d7n same studies show autsaace alarms :~~ b roncerned that maintenance levels t] d Lome sFriakler rystem would oust more an times as mu m~ , e sharply roduced, somotimes 'ust J by wi rop even loweras deteatoz~ are f , placed is thelast oar-.o.uth of.4mer• in an maiotaia u a eteclror a~ttem, even wltlt Y• nom us asaw moving tLe detegnr from one Iona- L'ca to another, A small adj>utmeat iron Lor,.es. Io some of tLe higher fire risk . __ a~ boas of cost uvia on iasWlaHOn. ~io aaa r>Rea yttoke a)aBe difrereace, Nuisance alarms eaa also be reduced ne(gLborhoodt, lye problem may go beyond poor mai me sprinklers are not a i ea, but home detectors ere aterrlJ?e b by switdliag from oaa type aCdeteo- r4 ntenance to vaa- ,-".m. IF detectors faze as badly as az- .~ let tc anctLo;, a'WtCGIMiTf•.tVpG detection seem to muse fewer pmb- ,; - F-..` .... _ .: •hci , "^ 6"<+ a nave Lr SnmC ' lti C l h Side Issuer Affecting Iletettorr lens than ionuatlon.type dey!nlors, mu - ami y ousiaa cam le've s: Per,deneto( smoky and titr r D f One ear! y problem with detectors for [astansr., And some breads seem to have fewer false Alplmr than e e er ec vaaeroae m the anwd sww; Flnduy;.fro-+ ° r~2 Sumry, pe &7.116885. was not the detectors themselves but (lie inattLCtion manuals that came otheR.91 ° ~'°^~ CaraenHOq sa,acy sod AnalY+G ol0avpom;nrtc(y6G Sawke De t, }dl them. The $rat 17ational survey of detector ownership gagged this as T7~reY. rtdro~ r' ~0b1^b Wth Tam HrPoAOnRoauSnwjapprrtarEf• 1e~10w EIr7ok and 4vuige, Inc., A De4ctor M Eoery Oflur•ROme; Ren,lp ofo Surwry of Smoke end Fo-e De7ecspr Duiurs Full R a sore point in 1977, As a recoil, [1L EI7 sou reworked to ' meiotic ma °L BrPOrt( l.onp'Ip an FkE Prorxrion Sysgnw Drbvor. ,u rt ~r ~re+ B ; <- C rt, Ro+rdantld Smob end Fere Detector 01o'uer fn thr U,dted S:wer; Finding frcm ;98 , n le Y n laLaR lla4lr..-FfRdisk ASSnsmeot ~~ F•& a 7 SYn:fY, PB Ba-118955. uAePOrr to Cprgrtu on Fire Proraaion Medepiatu NBS. ut~ D MCtan Amwa Afarm Syrtmu, P B (Conhvud on "76J C9: .U: Un 15:18 '61 7U5 551 95i9 SI'STEH ScS.Sr:i ',E ~%1 :'t~iu N \/t--4a4G VI VO\GYIVI,I 1M11inIYraJrOR yOjC ~h1i teebnologiral or englncering ideas may be needed to move the detectors out of the reach of temptation with- out impa9r;ng their effectiveness. Anothu future problem may ba penuedhtg people wbo already own a dcteotnr ro buy enough dctecmrs m fully pmtoct their homes. Figure 9 shows that a household needing 1 _ __ 1:1.-1.. M L-..n ~w ..y a detector than a household needing osdy ane detector, but that it is teas likely to lava the two detectors it ucedo fu. Cull psvtecGOa. In fuck Hfe bigger the home, the more likely it is ro have one detector, but the less lOtely it is to have all the detectors required 6sx its s{ze.~ ° MaidentW Snwka and FYcr D ta+or Looerega 4s the UnWd Stmet Ffndieg. from a laB2 auvwy, P$ 83.1IBBaa. Another problem may bo dse mis- use of ausgle-station smoke deteemn designed for the home is areas of multi-faras~y housing, sudr as cor- ridnra, where iategsated systems should be used, Such mitrrse has been observed aL•eady, and zuld grow unless iaspeemrs are careful to ;acts! oa the necetaary level of pro• •n.M~rv. Another future problem willbe re- placement of agWg deteemra. A rr teat IQPPA study of the failure rate oC lyQ(m1 detoetues v~aata tlsat 16 m 30 percent ofthe detecmts bought in 1974 have probably stoppedwork- iog.4° Since 1974 was the la+t year before detoLtor sales took off, it is not bw soon m begin worcyirtB abant Oms:asb sod ltmooey Fsaerds $s• volt oe dome aanFa DnrcWr 1:Q•ecflmneas~ FU',e:e a. Atw~lrhddrhxt needs tvv or:no:e delecro~ u pyre li4.ll m 6nvc ndeteclo: th;n e houmhoid th;: oeedsjvrt ore, boa Icss $Me1y w lout ohe number ,£d~ta:ors i~ needy ( r ;ull pm:Mlm. service life. Aod because testng is . p...- mal detecror failures may go un- noticed fur a very long time, ieavia3 tl:e househoids tz question crprw tatted, Lastly, there is the problem of teaching peop'.e how to make use oC WS c c:ha escape time their detectors provide. Roughly ane tlucd o{ deteo for owners sad half of all those who do not own detectors have never worked out an escape pL;a to use is case of Ore, let alone rehearsed that plea Housebaids that purchased their own detectors a-e mare likely' co have followed uP with escape plan- ning. HotLCeholds tflat inherited the[r detectors or had them supPUed by the builder or landlord were not much hello prepared foe escape than households that did not have de- tectors.ar'14ie reason seems dear: A drt+rrtnv wn.l~ brat when it is :he centerpiece of a heightened awarr.- aess of the requirements of"hcme iiresa£ety, not when it is just installed and forgotten. C nr Rttidmdd Smoke an6 Flrc Dexc'or Courage in tin Urwed Stetnu Pind/ngr Jrom o f~3r Surory, P$ B111aSS5. FEMA Announces New $tat9S fOr IVatl0flal Flre Prevtmtion Program The Federal Emergency Maaago- mcnt Agency (FEMA) 6u selected 10 addition] sutras m participate in a aatlonal community volunteer 9re prsventlon Drogram which seeks m redone the loss of life and Property in the Urdted States due m Sn. The 30 new states, chosen bat~use of their high fire deallt risk are Dela. woe, Georgia, Keaimdty, Maryland, Cerolinn, Vermont. Virginia, and West Vlrgiak. Its ouch of these smtea, fhnee oommunitiet [epresent• ing ao ut~aor suhtuban, and noel area will receive federal finding up m 325,000. The DLshict of Columbia will receive a similar g[ant to estab- W6 m tssdsan program. This program, initiated in 1984 by FEMAS OS Firo Adasinislratioa, is the Brat caneentreted federal effort m oombtne the resources oEgovcm• went at all levels with those of the Fro rrni«. the nrivxre sector, si.d community volunteers to build ,d support stsrsessful fire preventia:t prrogn.ms at the ante and community level. !n the pilot phase of the p:o- gram, 30 mmmunity•bued projects were established in 10 states. Those projects are being continued this year, end new ones will be set up to the new staves. In the current flseal year, the program is funded at S2 million, m increese of 3l million over the Initial funding. Limn Fa + fi3 11111 uP pni\V aav ~~ c aaa „~~i MEMORANDUM DATE: October 11, 1990 T0; Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Public Works Sub-Committee Niliiam J. Alexander, Counciimen16er1'~ Charles J. Buquet II, Counciimember SUBJECT: PRIVATE STREET DESSONATIONS ~~~ ~ ' I'mo`/ > C 111 ~~^- r 'I ~ Fp, ~ ~~~ r~== mii -~~ Since the City Council amended the Municipal Code to exempt abutting properties on private streets from right-of-way dedications, we have received numerous petitions by homeowners for private street designations. In reviewing these requests, the Engineering Division and Fire District have identified several key issues: (a) Emergency fire access. (b) Structural street requirements for emergency equipment. (c) Ongoing street maintenance. (d) Barrier protection for fire hydrants, Our sub-committee has met with Engineering an two separate occasions (October 5 and October 9). We agree with both Engineering and the Fire District that performance standards for private streets to protect the health, safety and welfare or pel'wua rr~~_rt~OS aM scent to such Drivate streets is needed. Prior to approving any further private street applications pu rsuan~ to the Municipal Code, it is our opinion that the City Council refer this matter to the Public Safety Commission for review and recommendations for private street performance standards. NJA:CJO:diw