HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/05/20 - Agenda Packet
•
CI
CITY
COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
ls[ and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m.
MAY 20, 1987
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga
City Councilmemben
Dennis L. Stout, ,Novo.
Pamela J. Wright, ~uaw,p,rrnm
Deborah N. Brown, eovnn;mem0er
Charles J. Buquet, cnvno;rm.ma~.
Jeffrey King, cav„~dm.mrx.
rrr
Lauren M. Wasserman, rw ,Na~aa~.
lames Markman. co-v aromrv
Beverly A. Authelet, rry a..t<
City ice: 989-1851 Lions Puk: 980-31~
LJ
•
~a. f~ City Council Agenda
May 20, 1981 PAGE
1
All items submitted for the City Council AgeMa must be in
writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00
p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City
Clerk's Office receives all such items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Dledge of Allegiance t0 Flag.
2. Ra11 Call: Brown _, Buquet _, Stout _,
King _, and Nri ght _.
8. ANNDIINCEMEMTS/PRESENTATIONS
NO ITEMS SUBMITTED
C. COMSENT CALENDAR
fie following Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by
the Cou~il at one time wltlqut discussion. My item may
6e removed by a Counc it member or member of the audience far
A ft[ut ti nn
1. Approval of Narrants, Register No's. 4/29/87 and 5/6/87 1
and Payroll ending 4/30/87 for the total amount of
;1,772,905.15.
2. Alcoholic Beverage Applicati an far On Sele Beer b Nine 9
Eating Plate, Mama Leone's Italian Restaurant, Donald
Gaglione, 9155 Archbald Avenue, Unit C.
3. Approval to execute agreement for installation oP 11
public improvement and dedication between The Geller
Family Trust and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
i
~
~ Street Frontage Improvements at 8151 Arrow Route.
~~
•
Lity Council Agenda
May 20, 1987
PAGE
RESOLUTION N0. 87-243 12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY
OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATIOI FROM THE 60.LER
FAMILY TRUST AND AUTlIDRIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
4. Approval to execuk agreement for installation of 13
public improvement and dedieatton between Kenneth J.
More 8 Nilliam H. Steele and the Lity of Rancho
Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 8670
Arrow Rouk.
RESOLUTIOI N0. 87-244 14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO LUCAMON611, CALIPoRNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGREEMENT FOR INSTRLL"TIQI OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM KENNETH J.
MDRE 8 NILLIAN H. STE0.E AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND LITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE
5. Approval of Resolution amending the unit amount for 15
fees in lteu of undergrounding exists ng overhead
electrical lfnes.
~...,,.,,TIO" "O.."., -ASS on
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONfiA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
RESOLUTIpI N0. 86-143 ESTABLISHING FEES
IN-LIEU OF UNDER6ROUNOIN6 OVERHEAD UTILITY
LINES WHEN REQUIRED BY PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVAL
6. Approval to award the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route 21
Storm Ora in and Roadway Improvement Project to Vance
Corporation Por the amount of SS1,628,411,85.
1. Approval of map, ezecu ti on of improvement agreement and 22
improvement security (letter of credit) for Tract
' 10246, locakd on the southwest corner cf Hillside Road
and Haven Avenue, suhmitted by Luther Alkhaseh.
C~
PAGE
City Council Agenda
May 20, 1987
•
RESOLUTION N0. 87-246 23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
AND FIIWL MAP OF TRACT N0. 10246
8. Approval to execute improvement agreement and 'L4
improvement security for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7646,
located on the south side of Hillside Road, west of
Beryl Street submitted by Dominic Brucato.
RESOLUTION N0. 81-247 26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR PARCEL 1 Of PARCEL MAP 7646
9. Approval to execute agreement for insUllatton of 'L7
public improvement and dedication between Paut Aparicio
and Ida Aparlcio and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
Street Frontage Improvements at 8512 Arrow Route.
RESOLUTION N0. 87-248 29
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCANON6A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
Af.RFFMFNY FOR twcTei i ~trnx nc a~eLC
IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM PAUL APARICIO
AND (OA APARICIO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
ANO CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
10. Approval to award and execute professional services 30
agreement (CO 87-053) with the fine of Hackett 6
Kramer, Inc. to prepare construction plans,
specifications, and estimates For the rehabilitation of
Vineyard Avenue from Arrow Route to Foothill
Boulevard. The fee amount of (14,500 plus 10f
contingency will be funded from the Systems Development
Fund.
RESOLUTION N0. 81-249 32
i i i
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO ANARO NHD
E%ECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH HACKETT AND KRANZER, INC. TO PREPARE
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES FOR 'ME
REHABILITATION OF VINEYARD AVENUE FROM ARROM '
ROUTE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
•
•
City Council Agenda
Nay 20, 1987
PAGE
11, Approval to authorize the recefpt of proposals for 33
Maintenance of Traffic Signals under the provisions
established by the Streets and Highways Code for Public
Nooks Maintenance.
t2. Approval to authorize the receipt of proposals for 34
Maintenance of Street Striping and Stencil Marking
under provisions established by the Streets and
Ni ghways Code far Publie Norks Maintenance.
13. Approval and execution of professional services 35
agreement (CO 87-054) between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and Psa~aas 6 Associates for the Drcparation
of BencMmerk aM Horizontal Control Networks Survey and
Aortal and 6eobase Mapping for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and surrounding areas in an amount not Lo
exceed 5510,000.00 to be funded frw Systemn
Developmxfnt Funds.
RESOLUTION N0. 87-250 37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITT
OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, TO ANARD AND
EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A6REElIENT N[TH
PSOMAS 6 ASSOCIATES TO PREPARE BENCWUIRK AND
HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORKS AND AERIAL AND
GE08ASE MAPP[N6 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AI10 SURROUNDING AREAS
14. Approval to execute egreemient for the Installation of 38
public Improvement and dad is etion between Brad Downey
and the CSty of Rancho Cucaaon ge far Street Frontage
Improvements at 8530 Arrow Route.
RESOLUTION N0. 87-251 40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY
OF RANCHO CUCP.MONGA, LALIFORN[p, ACCEPTING AN
AGREFJlENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM BRAG OONHEY
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN SAME
I?. Approval to execute agreement far the installation of 41
public improveeent and dedication between Jennie
Chioint, Riccardo Chiotni and John CMoin1 and the City
of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvemxnts at
8598 and 8600 Arrow Route.
City Council Agenda
Mar zo, 1987
PAGE
RESOLUTION N0. 87-252 43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC
IMPROYEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM JENNIE
CHIOINI, RICCARDO CHIOINI AND JOHN CHIOINI
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN SAME
16. Approval to grant staff permission to obtain quotes for 44
two appraisals for each property owner along Arrow
Route rithin the limits of the Baker-Arrow Project who
have rot yet dedicated, authorize aril direct the Ctty
Attorney to proceed witA Ominent Dmmain proceedings and
direct staff to proceed with short forty action of
Chspter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 for the
assessment of the cost for frontage improvements.
17. Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds and
notice of completion for:
Tract 12739, located on the southwest corner of Arrow 46
Route and Center Avenue
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) (209,000
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 20,900
RESOLUTION N0. 87.253 41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CULAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12739 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING GF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
Tract 9619, located on the northwest corner of 48
~ ~ ~ Carnelian Street and Jasper Street
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f813,500
PAGE
City Council Agenda
May 20, 1987
C
•
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bdnd (Street) f 81,350
RESOLUTION N0. 87-254 49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 9619 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
Tracts 9589 and 9269 (The Deer Creek Company), 50
Release:
Cash deposit (subdivision signs) S 4,500
18. Approval of a 3 year Preferred Service Agreement (CO 51
87-055) between the CTty of Rancho Cucamonga and Prime
Computer, Inc., for monthly service maintenance
totaiTfng approximately 530,960.00 over the life of the
agreement.
19. Approval of Resolution authorizing the destruction of
records Tn the Transportation Section of Engineering
Division and Community Services Department.
RESOLUTION N0. 87-255 52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE DESTRUCTtON OF CITY RECORDS ANO DOCUMENTS
NHICH ARE NO LONGER REWIRED AS PROVIDED
UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090
(Transportation Section)
RESOLUTION N0. 87-256 55
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS ANO DOCUMENTS
~ , NHICH pRE HO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED
UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090
(Community Services)
r~
C
C~
~J
City Council Agenda
May 20, 1981
PAGE
2C. Set public hearing - June 3, 1987 -Environmental 58
Assessmen4 and Variance 86-08 - (Mended) - Spetnagel -
Appeal of Planning Camaission denial of the request to
waive the maximum height rcqulrcment of 50 feet for an
extendable radio antenna to allow an existing antenna
to be extended to 72 feet on a .47 acre parcel in the
Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling
units per acre) located at 5327 Carol Avenue - APN
1061-111-19.
21. Set ,joint public hearingg with the Redevelopment Agency 59
for 7:00 p.m. on June 17, 1987 with respect to the
Redevelopment Pian for the Rancho Redevelopment Proiett
Area Amendment No. 1 and the Supplement to the
Environmental Impact Report prcpare6 in connection
therewith.
D. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had pubiic hearings at the
time of tint rcading. Second readings are expected to 6e
routine and non-controvvstal. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk
will read the title. My item can De removed for
discussion.
1 rnMC/n rwaT T_n_w ne annixr • errs mu •n ~
. w .iii y,~ u~"2C I"AL bVVL
~
y
-
NH H N L R NIB
N IlMING
N
IN D N N 0 NY
i~ NAItR ELEN N~TNT~1 I~ I K ~IEA~}{~'R
i F CILI Y.
ORDINANCE N0. 313 (second reading) 60
~, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING
i, SECTION 12.04 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOHGII
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE PROHIBITION
OF SN[MNIN6 AND DIVING NITHIN ANY POND,
REFLECTING POOL, ETC., OF A C[TY PARK OR OTHER
i~
i
i
i RECREATION FACILITY
]wa',~.
~,
'=~;r,~
•
•
City Council Agenda
w,,, ~n tmv
PAGE
E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following iteas have been advertised and/or posted as
public hearings at required by law. The Chair will open
the meeting to receive public testiapny.
1. ADOPTION BY REFERENCE MODEL CODES - CITY OF RANCHO 62
CUC IAA - nsiderati ono various codes as pub s
by the rternatianal Conferonee of Building Officials
and/or the International Association of Plunbing and
Mechanical Officials or the Nationsl Firc Protection
Association.
ORDINANCE N0. 311 (first reading) 65
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCIRI CUCAMOIIBA, LALIFORAIA, REPEALING
CHAPTERS 15.0, 15.08, 15.12, 15.18, 15.20,
15.2 AND 15.28 OF TITLE 15, BUILDIN85 AND
CONSTRUCTI011, OF THE RANCHO CUCANOIIG
MUNICIPAL CODE IN THEIR ENTIRETY. AND
SECTIONS 2, 3, 4, ~, 9, AND 10 Of THE SAN
BEPIIARDINO COIINTT CODE ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE
1T; AND ADOPTIO6 BY REFERENCE THE 'UNIFORM
ADMIMISTRATIYE LOOE•, 1985 EDtT[ON: THE
"UN1fORN BUILDING CODE", 1985 EDITION
INCLUDING ALL APPENDTLES THEREi0: THE
"UNIFORM BUILDIN6 LODE STANDARDS', 1985
_
EuiTi r•:, T~iL "YIUIVM 'KVYN,{1/LL WYL , lYOJ
EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THEREf0; THE
"UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE', 1985 EDITION
INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES; THE "NITIONAL
ELECTRICAL CODE', 1987 EDITION; THE 'UNIFORM
CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS', 1985 EDITION; THE •UNIPoRM
HWSING CODE', 1985 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM
BUILDIN6 SECURITY CODE', 1985 EDITION; NITN
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, AODITIONS, D0.ET[pIS AND
{
~
~
~ EXCEPTIONS TO SA10 CODES, INCLUDING PENALTIES
~
r\
L.. J
u
City Council Agenda
~... ,,.
PAGE
e'' S~ .., . ...... ,
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Alm NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR 121
THE ROP SED AR RIBALD YENU REALI I1EN
-
MPROVIMPROVI
~RO~ LI Y OF RANCHO CUC ONG . A
L N Y MIE N 9 H R ~H H
I H N6 N 6H ND R1
i
1
O
ME
HIGH a rea gnar!nt, r Bening a iaproveaaent of
road Avenue frw 19th Street to Highland Avenue.
and i~provear!nt along the south side of Highland
Avenue, fron 220' rest to 630' east of the interse.:tion
of Archibald and HighiaM. Said improve~aenis rill
consist of asphalt concrete pavasent rcplaeeaent and
overlay, installation of toncrete curbs, gutters,
sideralks and rasps, street lfghts, striping and
signing.
RESOLUTION N0. 87-257 138
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCANON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROYLN6
THE ENYIROIIMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY,
AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATIOI FOR
THE PROPOSED ARCHIDALO AVENUE REALI6NIOENT AND
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
3. ENYIRONNENTA ASSESSMENT AHD NEGATIVE 0 CLARATION FOR
EO
~
3T 139
~'f' tt TIGi `T 1 RB~Ei.`~
Z`tT
Y
3F'~t' U
'
-
a_ Ru1_4vTr7'rr ~i-r~r~-r~l~~rr
i r TC
-
prove o nvironaenta
ssessar!nt n L a to y and
issuance of Negative Declaration to pewit the
construction of stone dram and street improvnaents for
Hillside Road betreen Malachite and Archibald Avenues
pursuant to the Environaental Quality Act.
RESOLUTION N0. 87-258 155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY
AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
THE PROPOSED HILLSIDE ROAD STORM GRAIN AND
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
~ ~ ~ 4. RECOMMEND CONTINUANCE OF AMENDED ASSESSMENTS FOR PARCEL 156
M M N U M
bT~fiik3 TZ~fTRi"Td-,fuii~i .
PAGE
City Council AgerMa
May 20, 1987 10
u
•
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have ro legal publication or posting
requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive
public testimony.
1. APPEAL OF NOTICE AND DROER OF BUILDING OFFICIAL - 157
AB 0 DANGEROUS BUILDING - 10155 24 H S E -
This is an appeal rom the Notice an rder of the
Building Official for abatexrent of a dangerous Duiiding
at 10155 24th Street. After consideration of the
evidence, the City Counttl acting as the Board of
Appeals may wncur with or reject the notice and order
or may modify it as they see fit.
G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following ite~as do rat Legally require any public
testimony, although the Chair may open the fleeting for
publtc input.
1. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS -SUBAREA 8 - 116
Rev ew of existing Subarea land use and deve opmw!nt
standards as requested Oy the Lity Councii.
2. CONSIDERATION OF CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR 186
H .°.. KLL' r ° L~C.aw ni 9ii5 twin LLL
SOUL Y RD.
RESOLUTION N0. 87-259 193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING
THE GEORGE KLUSMAN HOUSE AS A SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE OESIGNATIN6 IT AS A
CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK
3. CONSIDERATION OF GATES FOR BUDGET MORKSHOP FOR JUNE 2 19S
JUN 9 UN .1 ND L1 N INGS JUN ND
JUN 4.
4. CONSIDERATION OF A RES LUTION MAKING A CONTRIB 1 N~TO~
~ 195
TH~NCH~ UC~ONCT~ R
LOPMNCY N H MINT
-
~
N~
TGTcEE~iI3D.o6b.0G
T~A~3`TS N H C ~fII€
~INTZrtxs N ~E~infniT"RFd~PFC3pnEi1T
PR J I-NCR VbNSE~ C~TINU~~~ ION
H A
~~
•
PAGE
City Council Agenda
May 20, 1987 II
RESOLUTION N0, 87-260 193
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL.'FORNIA, MAKING A
CONTRIBUTION TO THE RANCHO CUCANONGA
REDEY0.0PMEHT AGENCY IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED 1100,000.00 TO ASSIST IN THE
REFINANCING OF A PORTION OF THE RANCHO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
H. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council
for discussion. They are not public hearing items
,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Courrctl to identify the items
they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will
not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the
next meeting.
J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to
address the City Council. State law prohibits the City
Council from addressing any issue not previously included
on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and
set the matter fora subsequent meeting, Comments are to
be limited to Pive minutes per individual.
K, AO JOURNMENT
Adjournment to closed session for the purpose of discussing
certain matters related to Employer-E~F!oyee relations; not
i to reconvene.
t, 8eve riy A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted an May 15, 1987, sev my-two
(72) hours prior to the meeting per R. B, 2674 at 9320-C
Base Line Road.
~~
L
r°OyMNNNWNNNPr W/ O
NONPIOpMWP•VWiPiNrP
O• ~ O+ SOp°y1rr001'OT
iasa :<N ~yi~zn ~'
'" N^ ~~`4
y S f Tr1
NOT i
n r• z ema N
n a ~ ~ir <
2 S N °I'IN
~ a rE+~1N
°T
i ~'"
</PUPi J.iJOi~NwJJi ~/+
NiP J.l lyrPpNO°y} O O
zi=lips°a~wap4~~°s ~° 1r~'
~NS!'~~ OT~CIai~N n w
Nat =MyS10S NPO p2 T
I a~ Nf~Sa~f+;('1~ C S
rsz + eNZS a fl n
TN A~ EPNe
sg sa pa. C8 ~
T NZ ^ZT
S SNi ^ f,
n T° y ~
O N P °T <
• ~pp r C
i ° ~ a
CS E
RZ i N
p
~ o
a ..
p p
n £
p T
N i
p
~~F6 ~~ cis±llni.: T ~a N
3~^~, ~9 "' ~ Sm T ..
~"
TyN ~+ s : `48z a z
Mr T N) i N
AA yl'In O !1 O 1'1 ~ ~
00 L yy Pf O R O i
< :~ 'e 3
as m ~; ii i n a
N n '~ i
~~ y~ y r
T
M NT' t O I.
NN N N w
1
JJJI.-JJIIIP}}lll}lJ}}}Pl}lPlPl}}lll}lllW
JJq((~~MMPpP'IIJJI~JJ~iJPLYJWWYYYYYJ JN N+YMN
OiPyF T}WNrSS.'y~NPWN/OY~.P:=:'::Im:~: :P:
aW v
N}l NO
es~e Wlu°wia~}P Ol^o ~a
°J"iOSgaoaaSePP Op n°o n°.ue
oleo
0
_ W a
/NO / }NO N N
y°~~giou~s ~iu °o$8°il
PPOPNSOSSSrSSS/ S S
1
e o
m b
0
D
p
a
1 O
1 C^
1 ~ f1
ID !
la o
r!
is
~~ o
.a !
~a T
y ~
E ~ I'T1 1 ° -N
JNMrr .nN.NOMnrVNrdrJNpNN r rr j },
OOYOprNO,~ppyy++^JVJrrWN ~VI1}rPrYSWJm..fOJ~rVOryy ly
M.1 .10YJP00p1~ WrNJPrJ~ONdO..Jdny VINNWVJ W000N0 ;~
2 S S>t_y mwTTTTwT O 000 nn z ping n n IT ti•
3So~Iq~-~:N_>3~)'"°~~'siRSz~~'T4':1-.n~`nR~i.~3 :,~e~~ ~
OYfr N i >).1
)T rrrl'• NT iTMr•~NnZi MyxN <s) ~{S^D .(~ 1 r
OrrmlT lll< ZQT wr)nY }~ITTTrO <f1 iiin C C > w
^Ot< S Z, ^ xZ >rT nN NOppOrYf NT)SO 1
NOC>ti yTS ~ ST1TnOYNOffyO )it<rNT ynr.r I N
nTr< TarsmNt s i < 111 Z Cf >O wT:yyzsw ~ r
snW i./< NC yT r~ awa~N NhTTT ~- s- TI~rO M'w m
a°n TRwcCT R~--N~gi~bTRaes~f°€a~p-z $~7F'3QY~~w'r~'~ i s
neT - CC ss
020ni ~ NNR T TYS:T~O i.OYr ~lr• MN i ~
m>co
co n•
N o.-1 ~ i n ~iL ., Pi <'~isa rmz 1 N
_ o w~ ~rll~ n N o~ i
i r~ n r c N i ~' s y: Np i
Ar T < 1
n ai Tz
n ~ ~n m i
i
T 1
i
i
N~mw2.i.--,i.,°I ~ -nc,~~"=~.'I,ya fs:rnro <.NNSN
iN ,a~Npp $aZ nc~ zwT ~ wCpaT>r coT i
a iSrNiO~JZT~S>rTrN N1 ySziwynxN_w.piy
Otir Tnr n mTl_n0 ~ RnIZ•10)TarnT NN ;q
1-O ) iylmaT IOm . O S
)~I`wT OPyti N~ ~~) s Os n}f .T ) rr YS _
N r, YT w~IN TTOIMTPN r 2) III ~ly,lln n2Tm ~ } 1
n rsl afN N ONTrl O .O'- QQr iy~C> 1
i)~In> p) TT. TiCTNN ) ONOSf TIV ,r m
O r. TYr.l.li OaTTafaCr~ O))rOTr 1
) N s yifrs nONM CO !! ) D n+()~f rn,w O_ ;
T ~rirSSiTi <Ti mr~Nr 1 riN'r -w IA
fff~ff y N IIOI uric •T+
<^N 5T ~3 as'
! • ~ O"1 ~1 r 111 I
npn S nnN ~nf Nn n nfl n j •
OS q O O O p0 O Oy sys SO
aT ~ ~ d N~ N~ ~~iT T I
YS < n f , ) „ A I ~
1 t
S I n
TT T _ T TT T
s - - -~ e
yr N N N N MM N I
1 ~n~••
rVrrrn nMrrrrnnrrrrVrrrrnrr II n
p•pp!p±}33J IJIJ~JSSJ3lljll}.JlJJiIOJIJMJJI~J/•J JJJJJf PJ}~.P!+J+. JpPIJ.i.J IJ 1> 1
iOyO~Ip ~~sN~OdOMPMI: NoOr)rPNJWNVOOOr~P/.~N~ ;~
-
IL
N T
NNn IA f
N NNQnNNN OpJpJ S 8s P01~J.r Iqy~ iA m
dOOPONS40p000N~SP IP J.OPNGI VIM }rYrrNOO VI-l~d 7p ly N
ppOpp w~lpNppNpOpV UO.ONP NIpppFNMdYi O1Va yyNrOdp
TOOdO VIOPONO00ddO.IN<JSODOO Or).rddOOPOVOyO 1
a
•
- ---i -
.NN~ NP
I JwPN ~INr~
NitSsN ~ON~10SNrNlN+r
wwNOLYPJf s-I~SwSNi
oal~ni ic3 ii w~ ice'
ar<..~ sN nn Mn~'jl ~.
:scT= ~~
IIN UT~ Nw OIII
p S w
iN~p~ ~~~uai~ 1~1~ NN
y1 = O a TS
Ssa ~C-TO NM ;r
nCT .w aTl
Mr> N. 1 1
~YON~Nri 1> 1y
hr-^.~.. ~ ~ y
i.na.. ~
a.~.a ;
inrrilN° j ~. N
pe ppppe 1
~M~rTi O
yM N 1
NNi 1 L
raC1l ~ Myp ~ -r=i yal n , nT 1
M4l n w~~ 1I NCjr 1 Or I
•) E y N O_r ~~ i~ nJ$~ 1 y
N-SIZ ~~ w r S ~' Z' ~Da 1 N
•
~.~. ^ 1,1 n ~ S
~z nn ,: :I a >n
t° ~ m l ~; ~ °"~
~ I ~ ~
T i ^~ S N
p ~p[p`C 1
frCN 'J .III T~II _~~YM~ ~~LT~ ~' „T w~~ T~Hr)I'TI
4 } s sII C 8 ~-If>C
i r~~ ~N~;r ~•h aN CR~~ Ow~~ f. Mr.M
>r> £~ AIM *rj('T`NOT
.~ f ~Nnny M~~M> wwEi>wl aw~ni~TAS' .
=~s T~~ s~~;~ .a
rOT ~ T
w
L r T I
il N lo
s
ttt ~~.
» N s
~ „ I p y ~tC~
S .. F w
°
m
w i11 s i
nn
~~ now
~~~ n ~ ~.
s ~
n
a. .~z
I~Mw
~ ~
~
~
l
~ y
'>Z' ~~
N N~
CGii ~
ii
ii ~ RSS l
ur ~a ~
i
+r'r ww wlEl sr
r S$~
~
J i
:~~ z a» -
Pa
~,~ s
}
~~
+y~3i ~
I
y
-
I~1 /
~ C
~~^Tp
~
N
~ '
' I ~
~~ ~ '
~
I '
s
n
y ~
y
~
1
i N
'~.
a ~
1
~
1 4 N N 1
~ 1
T
S
~ 1 a
~ 1 >
~ '~ w i i
I Y OI 1 ~
N 1 CO
Mrn hrr r ' I f1
~ii~iiti~ irtl~o3 i v i
,•ww~YN G -~I JY~ 1 ~ 2
II 1 N
;~ >
1
I r }NNi J, w I a ~
y` pwQ + „ 1a m°
~IINyti pya.OpoV lpLwRM Iw u
rB.x SH~Op SOLPE ~~
1,
J
NIMNNN NpN~ yM NNI wwVNNMyyWWW~NNYPrr 1
ppyy OVypPw~}NysSwwwN~VNrWry VV~ fs yYY ~
~iywy+i rOWrrl~+O ~I~VMrrw J~NrrM rr rPyyON IK i
i~MMI tZ=~. sA (1C ~rL ~IONNMM pM NpM pN Nv ~M1NN `II I T y •
j w rri IF 1Illrfl ~i ln0~ tiiGT >III C'aTl'C QGOy G~T TSIC~ i
~~rr rl~i yr^r,> 7Nw1< ~r~ i yy`3y ~ •1 Ss .r.
irrwM T T 'L~ CC DTr~TiN~r~y'SsSSsS ZyM Myi
~y`O i+N ~w ~:aai Cfl~*~C^TiiNMAN~et3l~33i 2_T~j ~ ~ ~
~}~~jTw ~OT w ~I~SN ~~i0ir>Y>-i i nN~`~ n
i -Ir~ z z fi> - ~ CN~Irrrr ~T ~c{i 1
w Tei.. nlr>tl Oy ~ TGTG ~~ n~~-w`a `w w~w vw..l 1 s
.Neppo n >~i 1 a
rilfzil °=m a ~ea zg ~S'~~~ ggr ~ zr 1 z
~ ~ n~ ~3 te'. i-i>-ia ~ n6 i N
3 MiTTT111f i O
y 01 Y.f (C'~ OOOps Q
Q O I y ^NNO N^ s 1
' N ~'" ~~~zRn
1
~ sso ;
a , .. ..
q a'
~1~>TT S~T O~ VO~~O~~~H~ii~YY YIiJ T~~1pCr~ 1
M (~i >QS NC //~~'i a T11M Y~~rr++y !O jOlr 1
~~~yS~~l[~ 1O' i~]si~~igi~C1~V'y1000 T~:IN ~
O(~FE nO ~ E •ii• ~NTp F ; ~n
F~rj ~ T nC gT T~'ITn nCNi(li~f-„ i Ni ` i
iOfO N P ti 1 N jNy1 Nnn 1
rw ~ w3 w!r ;N~ n TIIIT n Im
• r pTrN Mr if Mrrr w rii 1
1, M~Q~ I T ~er i NT T~1 1 Fr ni Y p I N
MyM'M i iA T~T ~> T~TwTTT~ G C 1~
N Y11Y I +T r r 1 - ( T2L 1
n ~ 1 ~'. T TM Ni ON11i1 -<V T
I ~ff 00 f OM p ~ N` ~rrrlT i
~ro i N O- ~ \ NM p 1
A t1 O ~ 1
N ieqq~l pnpnn w' ; N nnnlln n 1 •
p ~ wY Tzq~ i~y ~ ! ~ ~ ~MN~~ ~ 1
T ~T~ T C r ~~~~~ T
iii pi I pipes a 1 ~
m ~ wTI TI~111n ~ rTm Tlw iw ~ _
I
N NNN ~'~ '~ NNNM~ N 1 O
1 (C~
VV/~ M~4~~+r V/~~1~M~M~+VV~VrVMN~Vn/V 1 f1
r S a ~r as +::t r r S>.r r~.
~'IS~tw'w SI S C S~wwflwwl www NlCii~ISw iw31 wp 1 p
II~h! ,r rr ra.+f s`+!!r>a pS wyl~yl ww w11~~ •++JSJ 1 0
wrlw• NVO.Iy lw.nWN Oii 51~1lyNVO~~rpNJM 1~ Z
1 j 1 i
1
r 1 ~ V
' r 8 s : N M V I.N II NSp ~' ~+NI NN iyy. 1 p
y `LGNO.f PS PwJWO V~Of~OPPNiOOYN~P~~Y~ ~.+iq pYN 1'1 !
P Nw O~IwO~VwTOp~ Op 00l~O p~O•M..INnP~nnYOWfI 1+
+ MMM C OIaOJOhhhhhh111111N aA CO CC w00 000E GO Cw VV Dii.o+aCCCCCC OwrCC OO CC
I 1
I
i I
1 I i
i I
i ~i I i i i i li •
I ~ ~
~ ~ ,~,
•
W
-ai'o n-mu.nmNNrm err r2r°~ mn ~Ir..m vPaa i ~
JWNWrrO-'•NrgNPaP W.Or++O+N JPOrrmpyN J J
c
^~n nrnm>mm LP.»>ss»Yr» Tmrrrnm~n N i
rni sY>cvccrmNAS.-r. r~-..n .. zz z z -. 1 r
a~~asZazrNmmrrrigrzmi ai-rimrNc
f y.r //~~ Fn OGL»> O > ylrrT>Rrn Z 1
SNN>T~TC Z+~ npnrrTCr>r6 m 09~
C NT PNI>nTm T)p r. s>~m _ nnTrN1 r C_ 1 r
S39 yr 2rr Cr{ fZ12AYrFR 2YiZrT Nj n _ j
rtimT»YNbNO rA >1m pp r TTTTPjrmP • 1 n
rOi°n Ca>Om °Nm ~mTnn rni C
Nnmr9 n NTm• n T<m a 1
A nZyC NZ T Zw°r>C N9 mF ZOr Ffmr.t 1
Nir Yz _ n non.. m In ion r i >a
mz rar-9>n mim a
<n T~ ~zocrosr m o NT >
• mnN2Am r(n Z
• O O 2y < b Nn)
3p0 A• 3 N02 V~
SO O N ~Zn Z nn i• T
:N mmu s° n
:i >.~
i ...
i N ~ z
n c r
z no
N oa
• r
F
Y 1
<<9NNNrArrrl mTTCnTmOri3 irNmN3ZO9 < <
(+n ~~Tr m_rmmmiZZrrrrTOr« Zmm Y~mCm»9m O ^ 1
n > O VTNNN >PTrAFmNiI i°1Ytr- 1
n~~w,4Zr1 iaasa i-z. N.n i"•iisNN rzziz9vr: ° °
srsne c1zN c rvsr>rms r n Im
ommmxma f. ~fn n smry.ln T arTmz r N x 1+
M INnrrrT> m11 m: 1rr> m
nA~r~nsr COOT 00 O rFf >TN r ~ Im
OmiaaArN CmZ Z7P S Crp1 n IN
>OrinrZmN it
AszNN~~.<Niai a °or„`r a Mmai 9 m m r
p~ CO> KNr m3 T ~A
FM-Or3i 1_r_K_ 1 P mNTTY_ m > n
„PrC yPm m n P it >. V i
r yjy A nCCZ 2~S ° O v• 1
~'^ O- 1 1
_O ' >_ rr 01m rn
NTmr ~ r 1 1
n rQi ~ 1
nnn n NN nn can n ni
m i 19
~.T N m nn TT pA i r i<
AaA A 21 At R n as T
_ r
mm _ F ~".• 1 L
O
NNN N NN 1 ;
1 C
a r
PRP P r J!!J U rNlJJ1JJJ MIJJJW L
$ Zr ZZosooc~o~eoaaaoaoi,cmamagm mo~ma~W~l.~S iA >
N+WNroRo-~~gJWV amrPNIWN.•oN~i:iiniii~O:~'i ~
i >
,o
1 1 e
N ••N NMN 1 ~ ~~
pmrWnP -e v N NrnN~J m
p+J JPONMVNNPPNY WyPVm J.G Pr!•+W rU S I 1
OlmTOPmP OrNgNrmOpWPr00r NLOO+r OP ° i .'•
J 1
rrNlOV°iONO~pN00~lOOPNnONP NOOOO+OOP O w
S
qP+PrN..-P~gP.m:.e nu... m+r~m :nn vimo~~.e:ueW`mmw i~
rmralVNgwr~ON?mNPrw.l u~+PrN.pNWWPrrgrq+-.nnwrN ~
)C[m iywr>WNi pmnjl >n('IPSwppT f. +iT TTm zp rp>n CnC nnnnl~
_ z 1 + T•
~NTZ CZf~O•Ci OlA<2~~~tTnCZ>nOTNV>iCI~2rl~IrnCpr y0i93fpt
rT>~Dpmn~j>nm pmn IZr=minrry n»s•Zrp.[yj ;m
myT)OnZrr nrZjmTTpD)O> arZ1>pp 32 pZ CD
F zmr )>vm >XZ n>m>zT:ra » :r Opprnz>r~>
r. z z zyc Pmrrr>rr szz-m mz~zr z
i„a, °i ~jo~n~~r. nt DSTm aacii~T.. v ii>:~mm~11Ei .).n 1 r
z eT~-imx ~..m nrm <o~-r iz<r Tn ar.-z ~
me nm nNnoNi pnrlNi~c)aTi ey nnT £~o m°=ev'i ~ a
„s r^
m ~e r vN c~zi.N Or a~ rzm m ° i >
na innsn °'1 nni ~N i
rcrc• N c mr
r >z u`z
N n. cn
n n . ~ ~.
o N r n ,,, N
z
C z
i n i
i n
r „rarr~ S r nnra<51 Gy p~ a oinpyso n i
M) f Z Pmp2DP ZN1<CCT SSria>Opnrm2T ~
SNNT=MP.MN <'ni yTriTaNTmTTZNN>~T<ZjpmTra 1
rS3rm rrC T+rr•Cy 1Vp:rDr.+Tr rr`<~ TT pr
D naD2n nn ZCnTrCi DVr1rnD Tn~iCNMrrT> 1~
GG C CY(y~CC~OrCNPrZrC>r>nrC$ C CZn
nC 1'1 ('pfl )(~nnT nMrT1 r(~f)yTT'~IN ftp T N79 I l
jl nrrrrr r;yrPDr Erm 1 LTDrrrmZ
p pprOrppOTr pp pTr SpO pN > XD O Im
rs ni as>agaDD °aMin- w~ D-~ii v.'.Da rm~~.r. ~. gi
sy T aaNe SSS •ar a TyTV YF N ~ ~r
!r i ii sTY~i.n+ Y~T in r+Tw ii TK ~nm ~N i
~m ~ ~~ ~"I~~TZ.' _~ Ta jg° N ~~ zn ~>T V~ N
~ r:
i o r~ mn ~ m~ n m 1 i
P w > o
n cn M~ nn n nn aN ~n •
n a oc pe c po N o
z m n 1.{T T z~ n i i
D y r T1• D ry P 11 1 P
N _ _ Z )
N T 1 S
n n
1 u1i NJ N
N N NY r 1 U
r
i -iV.r V. }V~ ++ ++..<. +V~ iS n
PmaPPPPP?~P^•PPRP~PPPP?~~pPPIM1P ~PSPT~PP~~PnP ly 1
Pq+NNNNW NrOCgMpP+WN~+VWWµWUWVWVyMNNNNNNNNrrrr ~: C
O+Orrq+VNrnYOrPN+MN-OOgNP 1 E
ii
N > a
P • iT )
W+yyy11 fj N ..pp N+NrPN N+PW Jr +q+r ONONrP1N PW j.A T
PgrWO~ONij ggOWpJN~OPqN~ rPrgONyrPN+NOrw.pNr r N
qrV+qq++PNn+gVICNW+ 1Z
Wrpr U'Tie°gO°oo°$POO°o°o°on~Pngl°nv°e °P $e$M°.e °so PO mmjo°n°o °oonn'.a i~
M
NWy.rpjWar•~Nr r~`r rN n,Nr.. .:+pwN-:N-r: .'-+
O>b~r uPm nay sNOa_..-u+rOrbmrro~~f
+Na••O NPwWe••P~N>OWprawOraONNYONwmWUOr.dNN Y•
• N y.iNNN rrar~PTaggTp Op222 m^Zp 'SZSNr>
90p>m -_>~_-Nn yy>A>sS! (IC C>~G 1S » >r2
__-Cr Tq f aNT>NpY~O r•n-.SripT~O~rmxaOCnOnnr~m
pi SrsA~~aAA > pmOm 6q it>R>O>pYrIN Kw
czm E. .o oNrnaR zz~mrr~i-~«rm born
2p . r av <» or vnga ~ rtair >mnarhlril
~~°.«• z~i zp~re> yr« m i.•> N r sszNOn1I~
Ss »RCAm ~2~ > gnwN Mmq iisx s fl
c. i`ca No ~ar-sr~arrrQi Tr~ prrn a~ir~l a
a ~~ pp ~.. a sn z. caa a mm 's przzrN smmhr
i<rrza z pTprw rds rarpssx>+ tz
mi~wil ccz cE c4m i~«~`~ o~ n m««~~ sNSy im
Op n ant nA r ~Nr -r~
« zi na~a. ~ >c= ~ •e nnni r<o rF'~i ~A
. C 2 ra Ln1•~. • C..• Or2 ~ p O
s> •r 2 r N «qi Cllr N nm em
z Pm wrc c n z TN n<
n >p .>•• q n nm .n
za t i a
«v so N
na 2 .i i «a aq
v z « r .. s
s n
isi z e Ny
z•
ondy..r«sx asgmrrsnszrprNr«raTr argo a•-ar
raW>Fum>m$mmarzzeer.>azearzw r: E;wNwza<mz>:
s q~w..apr«wNNerPrt«e->NerNr wNewT«NN
z c cx-••rr:~o a„xrrmr zr Taermr
F•S•a qr :Rn Aam an pa> ar!':a~ e:
•ooa rcFaz p TC !r px- TaC cery~v>e~y Cy
C+ar oar NA~l 11NWw« ~i (lp ~(1 q(ln in !l 1>f`~(f
nZ fl ••I SOnnTMOr•n NP>C !'HS> ti ff }Or
i Ot+mrri nCQ Viq 00~ O OtnOrpOplrO O
Ty\SaO« >M glmnM }.j nr ~ fla Na a.' A^a2a mArA
1Cm f ~N T! > Tq ~ 2~ >r i
>IPgn Ni••=q A rq qP gwTew qr Og1e
__w T12y1( N t nTr r _{_ _MT Of .(
iCx yC:i P`~~ i i! O me OS i
NiS m yry> »~~T~pr ~^rH ~
nm.•1«.. rT r
p 1 T .. p n i
~ a> •• Nm
• n n r± n nn ni ' n
s
r a p pe pr
_ z T i xz Fi n ~
r o a n up i! z a
a
•• a m
__ Tm
2
N w N N «~. a> N
r l~~ }r. +r > r•((''r~r.>}P fA/P~~ +•lrr>~a r•rr..lp`
y PPRpPR'R~SP~PPiPP>PP~PPpSPSOPPPP~VPPP PR
MpUEW°•=o< ••T P~VNrOaP+ppJ.. Nr•QaOMTV PNn??OdVV, •1
I
P N W
WOpMW.•O WN.NI~PWiVrJdgr rn npryy^Npr~-WNI+.N Nr r•`~y
}~ P~ Nf-rP PaNgWVppLOpp ~r+QpQ .}
aOdTpOOWCaOWarOaPwFOirOWfNdJ®MOPO~OarOP mR
CJ
r ~
r P
i
z
n
C
C
L n
>
i Z
>
7
-r ' -
it I O' yrsO~ ~ iPerO ~ rO.~pN jyy
<~Orrre~P~~nN .OOOPy~P
• Z Z< ~c ~rrrN
' ~ x tiF10m~ 2 iTYrlfy
x .. N ~ ITT r~~mm
' .. iKT~~i ~ ~ YO I~i 'I ~M
i~
~I °~.rt ^rrti .r.~ Y mrt.~~ic
i
r ~ e X~slw sYC°
°~~tNrN, ~ iia ~~:m~~
Tm
I ~ ~O O r rAO~a
i°~' ~ °
• ~n9 ii c ~2
N NI N N
l1
n
T ¢M T'y]I1' J TT OTSN~pO
i~a ~TE~ +~w~ ~~zmz~r'GY
iC iO lne cm nn
I N
1= 1
P .
m j
it r
n
N
v
N ! i ~ si s} Y:~Nti '~ is
~ p N ~ 1 s CIS re e
.C T Y ~I a z
1
z Mi s = i
n ~1 m n Y y 1
1 ~ •
c m O i a w m 1
i T ~ ~ i ~ ~ i
a'. A a a i a
n -I ° T~ ~ Y
~ * ~~ ! 1 x
m z l d N~ i m i °
N' N I n
jj rJrr 1
~~yyJ~~ yJIIJ •rr J-e~S 1A i
~wrl+~r qo~ Oe6oe a la °
m~l e' lWN OSO P •YIN i+O~a ~a 2
1 Y
n i+ i O W 1) V
1~ m
i u~a Ni¢~','."Sg:~Ns" ~urou r ;.
IZ
r•
.. °n'~a~~-°.a~S Frei °u c°+• g~°su °o'~' a 1
w
I
I
i i I
i i i
I I
i I
Q ~~I ~~ I it
C~I~i ~ ,.... aw.~,«... w.aw w rw~ w.,.. ra... r,: r...-r.. n..ti..nn.
•aM11C~/10N /A 4Cdque waaav [ • ati. o.r
•
~m
c~o r
ly ~N ~ r7
l
•
~U~ L
:]
O ~ •r
V ui
Uzi O ~1
u~z _ ~!
s
C _ _
~
o -- O]
U 'N
-_ ---___ -ele No -
T« oy.,..a N ,u[dNa !en<rele unnN
1191 •eelw! MQnI no.
Se~,M,. (:~. 9]!U Sr0 B,[^,[01 :O i.i LS .i]En nC:: ..q....
aon«us...e GlOG41lIMCAI
.~
~'rwA'~wdl'rrAl
i«h. AL1CE Coo! .
T
!<e:~el,erYd ~Ia1,.n Dal,
z nafulA d arRKNrtlq re.1. r«eN ._..._
iViL10NC. Dona In aMN'ewr Sec fa]u
!lN9w ]ialw ISSUAYCE !!,/i., ~;
]. T]IlISI p A,NiK]IpNI]) R! tK
rY1!
TEA. l'ST. ! 1~ ... _
CT al
a IIw N MNe~
.S,r,'• 40M'a Iul[Y Awuu[,nc
S l,slle, N ^YeflNiw eN ]wr
9155 A[eplbalO Aw.< Vnlt K
awnr c.r
!aletN o
]
~
l
uerenga 91
]0 San Mrr
u[a1ro
• Nq
i IOTN 15G. ~]
,a
~
lln. iYfeai llw al-1N]99 F.M~~Iro M<iti Y_;
• al.wq a+a.. M •Ilre,l lr,~ fl-M+ir w/ Yrwr G' I:nx[7
iW raY~ iM
1. nw Yee w Y<,a aufeN N • Mwlf 1U. Ilar, Y,a ewr NRW ap N N ~www~ N 111, Al<Ma!
M«'T CwrN b « re1NMw N h D<ryr,nwr y«
11. la11Nn • "Illn enea« w awa 1 w l0 w w nw<l.wr dAJ NW M IrN Ienr M fYe al1!<nle'r.
• If. A/1l'sn a!'eo IN rn,r a"! "+•~!« awNa1M w aa~NN !<eere/ anr+rer N1 IYw w !w 9eel9[w«a N • 1.<en<w, a=
AI MM M .RI nN nNare « 1«M1 V aMMN N h d M a4NV9s lnerafe Cannel an
10. STM! Q CAIMOM~ Cwexl N ..___'an aernarElu ~ ~:
u.r rr~~ . r ..~ r ~..:.<..r . r r..
...«c. n. w ~-+r ,...rte r..+.. w w ~~Y ~. '""=~ n
w..~ ~ ~,.......... v ...„ .
Ir. a11lICaM F
AMlK1TON 1t T~~tltig0~
I!. SLi! p CaIIgANn CwnF N..-ian_3ecuctllon_.. ._______p.y _,____ •1 -.i
r IIMnF P1,rr.
.................................................._oOnfS NARlO ._.___............'...:.
~1,nwN.MN.._.......JW w ......... ..........._.. Oli<e an................_!«NarW ..
!]o .Val WrYr Drl«a FA4 Lbr: F« Drlminwr G'w Qr[1
MAfINf1 LEoNa's
L~ocATlO: 9I SS'C" I~2cHf/lAtD Qo>;
r~Paaty ~OSW~eY 7~oN4: `7fNE~¢At tfJAt-
{pNINq O'F ~S~ClAIj ''~tt't''L~:
/VORYN : 6EaiR~a -/~.lw''~RfA(.
,]OttTt/: GthNR11f. ~q'`}.IAL
EA~7 ~ GGMtRAf.. RINI.
~u_ Scw+-a
lJlST : Qt3tOtArjt~t. SCOW
~I
~A~~~N
-0 ~ MAMhA~
~ = teWE'S~
a c~
a 7iN~s
~ Aflci
"
% 7fa~w•s
s
Eugfe.n~c
r
s S+ tRnvtt_
~" ~ V~cANj
•
N
r~
U
!o dt S~ 8~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1981
T0: City Cou~rc11 and Ctty Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Ctv11 Engineer
~ ~~ ~~o~
a~~
~~~
;:
~~ 6 z
~~~>
Isr7 I
SUBJECT: Approval of Agree~mt for Installatlm of Public Ilaprovewent
and Dedlatton between TM Geller Fasdly Trust and tM City
of Rancho Cucaagnga for Street Frontage taiproveaents at 8757
Arrow Route
RECgIE~ATI~:
tt is racosstanded that City Council adapt tM attached Resolution
approving tM Agreeaent for Instellatim of PuDltc i~proveaent and
Dedteatlm between TM Geller Faalily Trust and tM C1ty of Rancho
Cucaamga.
eAaaDUOiAIBB.TSis:
TM attached subject Agreement Mtreen tM City and TM Geller Featly
Trust provides for street tmorovwents which tnrlu,r ~~~rn. ~~~~~.r.
sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and street pavements along
teller's Arrow Route Frontage. The tellers have agreed to grant to the
City a RoadwAy Easement t0 allow for LM wldenlnyy and felproveamt of
Arrow Route in return for tM constructlm of said improvements.
Sa1d street taproveaents will be constructed in conJunctlon with LM
City's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storal Drs1n and Strtet Improvement
Protect.
Res ly subNtted,
R o
Attachments
RESOLUTION M0. 87"~y3
• A RESOLUTION ff THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE LITY OF RANCHO
CUCAIDNGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AtltEEMEMi FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEIEMT AND DEDICATION FROM
THE 6ELLER FAMILY TRUST AID AUTIIORIZIN6 THE M11YOR AND
CIT! CLERK TO SIGN SAME
MHEREAS, the C11;y Clerk of the C1ty of RanGw Cutanonga to establish
requtrewents far canstruCtton of frontage iwproveawnts to conlunctton wlth Lhe
Baker Avenw and Arrow Route Stop Dra1n and Street Iegrovewent Pro~eet; and
IAEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drfw approach, sidewalk,
street lights and street paveeents located at 8757 Arrow Route, to be wade
part of the Baker Avenue ant Arrow Route Stofs. Dra1n and. Street Iq~rovwaent
PrWect; and
MEREAS, The &ller Fa•11y Trust Ms agreed to dedtate R1ghL-of-Nagy
as reteDurseweM to the C1ty for said laproveaamts.
MOH, TIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tMt the City CounC11 of the CiQr of
Rancho Cucawonge, Callfornta, dos accept sold Ieyrovaewnt Agreewent,
authorizes the Mayor and the C1ty Clerk to sign save, nM directs the City
Clerk to record saws 1n tM Off1a of tM County Recorder of San Bernardino
• County, California.
~1/ /~
~ ~ -~
~a
- .. ......... vcunvawn
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, C1ty Engineer
BT: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer
~i~Mp
~~ '1F~
< '
s
~'~ ~ II.
I9.'
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreeeent for Installation of Pub11c Iaprovenent
and Dedication Mtween Kenneth J. Moro and Nillian N. Steele
and the C1ty of Rancho Cucaawnga for Street Frontage
Islproveawnts at 8670 Arrow Route
tt is recaaswnded that City Council adopt the attached Resolution
approving tM Agraaarnt for Installation of Public taryroveawmt and
Dedlutlon between Kenneth J. More and N1111es N. Steele and the.Clty of
Rancho Cucwonga.
•
BACRalouo~Aluarsu:
The attached subject Agreeaent between the City and Kenneth J. More and
wi 111sa N. Steele nmWMs fnr efreet 1~nmvrrnfe rhl{h 1,u~LiA. ~~~.h.
gutters, sidewalks, drive appraehes, street tights and street paveeants
along More-Steete's Arrow Route Frontage. Mr. Moro and Mr. Steele
have agreed to grant to the C1ty a Roadway Eassant to allow for the
widening and t~provsent of Arrow Route 1n return for the construction
of said 1laprove~ents.
Sa1d street lsryrovseents will be constructed in con,~unctian with the
City's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Stons Drain and Street hproveaent
Project.
Res y suh~itted,
f
R M:
Attachalents
/3
RESOLUTION N0. S-J " ~y T
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DF THE CITY DF RANCHO
CUCAMDN611, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT TOR
INSTALLATION ff PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDIGTION FROM
KENNETH J. MDRE AID NILLIAM H. STEELE AID AUiNORIZIN6 TiE
M11YOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SATE
MEREAS, the Ctq Clerk of the C1q of Rancho Cucaawaga to establish
re~trements far construction of frontage teprovaoents 1n con,1uncttan with the
Baker Avenue aM Arrow Route Stone Dra1n and Street tegrorsent PrWeet; and
MNEREAS, 1nsUllatlon of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk,
street 11yhis and street paveawmtx touted at 8670 Arrow Route, to De erde
part of tM Baker Avenw and Arrow Route Storms Drrin and Street Iagroveeent
Pro~act; and
IBEREAS, Kenneth J. More snd Nillia• N. Steele haw agreed m
dedicate Right-of-Yyr as relettursennt to tM C1q for said legrovaents.
NON, TIEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLYEO tMt the Ctq Connell of the C1q of
Rancho Cuca•onga. California, does accept said iproraeent Agraeeamt,
authorltes the Matyor awl tM Ctq Clerk to sign snee, and directs the City
Clerk to record saw in the Offtee of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
• Counq, California.
~ti% / _.
/ ll/ l~-J
/`~
CI`fY OF RANCHO CC'CAil10NGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
May 20,1987
Mayor and Members of City Council
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
~,, until
LLI
~ x
~'~ ~ ~
~~, >
l9'7
Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
Modiftcatton of Unit Amount for Electrical Lines for FEES
In-Lieu of Undergrounding
RECORBIOiTIOM
Staff recommends approval of the resolution anending the unit gaunt used
to caiculate fees in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead electrical
lines.
811CKBROUNO/AMLYSIS
On Mey 21, 1986, the Councii adopted Resolution Mo. 86-143 (copy
attached) estabitshing unit aaounts to be used in calculating fees tn-
lieu of undergrowMing existing overhead utilfties. Those fees were
based upon iMormation provided by the varfous utility companies.
On December 17, 1986, the Council approved Reselution No. 86-143 A (copy
attached) which raised the amount for telephone lines based upon
information provided by the Telrnlmn' rnanany,
Staff has since received a letter from Southern California Edison (copy
attached) stating that the 1986 Tax Reform Act has required them to
charge Developers an additional 67% for taxes. In order to collect
sufficient fees to farely compensate Developers for undergroundfng, staff
recommends increasing the in-lieu fee for electrical lines from f100 to
f167 per linear foot. The amount for telephone and cable TV will remain
as is, f75.00 and (10.00 per if near foot respectively.
Res ec ully Submitted,
~u 1 u re
city En9lneer
RHM:BH:jh
Attachments
G
~aaatta fo. as-w
• tnaYttu ar rR ntt CWtcIL tr 2f[ Cirt a WCfO
WggfA. CLLIICYia, YtAnifflfG ftm O Lim Cf
NafCfAfY7fY gffffAf ar6I7t L>>O YfO tfpfIlm IT
fl.tffLG C{Ipq{IO YpAY.
YfnW, eN Rw/y Cap/pip •at Ciq Cavveil of cte Cery vE
f•tc\e Cspsye r/tlp to dtpt Nt rwsLL N uaeiptll pinta{ or•rfrN
ueilLq 1We 1• eNp N wewN • r<e •ptbttc •N dsirtll• vortiy +vd
limy etrleert rltl/e tle Ciq; W
NQfY, tN nq CwN/1 eNytiso ebe to it aspnq ev
ntellitl rtNdt H gLLttll) tpp awt ttl ee Neapl L\ rN•r{r•vediy it
tN p•e epc NlMtlrr wrN; eM
Y/tfp, H. nq Cwrll eN R•neiq CarLee/N !•rttK rKyeit•
the G etrpb step, to p ieYrre/etl p rprin dwU-twt to rN•yewN
Nllit/p tN [Me p ettl tetw, !w A Ilw N apegrwNly Hanle
•Wet1pN ep wC•N rertrptlM.
fi, rf{vat. N it trbr<•. y tM CLq Cewdl at r\e C+.q oe
WN CWeYtyt. CNGlardt sNt r\Nr t\e RwIM Cettdtetp retner•e
pgpee N teN N liw N rYbgre••Ilq, eN IN WR N e\t pfra)rieu
cttlirtlN d tle t•tlerleY.
1. nrerl.n tM1ttt - llas w uNp ewt.
:. reltNtN Lltp - Rf Ier tiaw lNe.
). Ctlb S.I. - !lC M tips [we.
7\e tp Wtt getl pt t{{tepp ped •rrt fer lLesr tone N pe\ utLliq
aeerglM Ne •tiliq NNe.
141m. Alflpm, w A80RO tlt. net dq at w7, 1911.
Artlt Ntpq Lly, ftll, Yrl{\t
fCOt IeN
dff~r+ Whit
q 4.
Ar[Iir:
lwry A Ntlel•t,
L, IgnLT A. Aftf6K, na nts'tl He Clq et 4ae\e tuupnp,
QllteNlt, 4 NrtM esM4 tltt tb lsyly 4p/utle• vu dui? p•nN,
wR^eN, eN NptN y t\• Clq Cpwll N tt• Clty e! Wete tucewap.
GliteeN{, it • rgder p•t/y N sit C/q Cowll Ida et cN 2let d•7 of
Mq, Ifs.
I, 1
/6
taavr[a n. ot-tu t
~ atanorta or na cirt caes¢ a m tttr of aatuo
CCGIOtC1. C/Ll/eYfa. trafaa aateL0it01 N. M-1V,
awutma no n-etat o. oaapcmawoo waaauo
ortttrr cne rae upcnu n -erataa caleutatN ataoeac
eWY, eM Cty U V tw•lK K t•lw~wlw /rw W C•etrLL
AItKw Cwpry Wluetq tMC ta• •ewgt twt N •etwwewt/et t•IMew
/lw• 1• elpw raN Kwtw•11 1NlusN.
a0a. Z•OOMt, M tt r•t•leN, y tat el4 0.wet1 k eM Cty N
a••tt• GttteM, 0.IlleM• taw ta• tNt wets N M rtwtW !w l...
/t-Itw a! atttarewtty w1wlY teteMN wl•tar llew ta•11 M gt.e0 )u'
ttwt t••t.
moos, tenors[ .N Yel'rq tu. vw eq rt a.w.t+t, [tae.
nYt Nett. newt. wwe. at•a
oao•, ow•
taol/x, Mpe
~ el
et.t• {. aw.e, igtt
[trot,
wy ~. rw.tw. ctct etwa ~
:. await a. rsan. cat as w w o{a N a.•r• e.u•t•at.
Gtltwtly M awty wetllt Wt tM ltrewlta t•w/wltt eM rls rtt••t,
•rKwN, wa •atatN y ta• etq t•~ell r ew Cty N swat 0.•ttr•tt,
4Itlttel•. N • ew•tw rxew J ..{• n.y .~~...,w r w. iiaY M) w
wat•etr. Irf.
Or•wtN to/t late Yf N attwMt. Uw et atetM 0.etetryy
0.1l[wet•.
L7a' L/dtrf. K.i(/IUa,Af.41a"'^4/
Tht tcr;^
crop v: .,~_ _ ~ .. r..~ .a ~...
cn.:e.
.>~_
ATTEST: _,f•j1GC~-~-
Cdr Cle BarKta Carr,+onEd~Xarl
ev: ~lL~'~r11 AIL.a-
~7
.J'~=
. 3ourMm G//la»ii Ed~wn Company
fT0 tl[T iOOTMILL MYL[VgO. fYIT[ !
V~LANfI. CALIipINl1 !I Tff
CN[11YL A kY1Nf
'"'[•~"~' Pebruary 11, 1987
Lauren Wasserman
City Manager
Rancho Cucamonga City Rall
P. 0. Box 807
Rwcho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Each year, regulated utilities such as 6diwn receive sub-
stantial amounts of •Contr t ons in Aid of Cons ct~ion" (CIACI
from parties request nq • ectr ea nsta a ons suc ii line
extensions, streee lights, facility relocations, and cogeneration
facilities. These contribstions can be in the form o! cash,
services or property.
• Edisoneforstheflnstellationxole~lectric~tacilitieaoneeded t y
serve their projects will see the charge for those contributions
increeee .~~~i ric.til.. T ,_ .
6Tt. Prior to the new~taxulaw,•~COntzibulSon~intAid of onstruc-
tion received by regulated public utilitlu were excluded from
the utility's taxable income. Rowever, the new tax lava, effec-
tive .7anuary 1, 1987 require utilities to tract these contribu-
tions as taxebli a 1_ n~ome~
The California Public Utilities Coavfisaion has recognized
that the effects of the new tax laws era wbatantial and has
opened an investigation into the matter (OII 86-i1-0191. This
investigation will include the effect of the Tax Reform Act of
1986 on CIAC. The Commission Se expeclad to decide who should
benr cM incidence of the taxs ratapayeraj the party requesting
the project= or some aherinq among retapayera and the coneribu-
tors. The Co~iasion has scheduled several activitis^ to
thoroughly review this issue:
February 9, 1987, a workshop on CIAC issues is set in
Sen Francisco.
o February 11, 1987, the Commission will review tau utility's
advice letters on how the tax is eo be treated until the
'~ Commission's investigation is completed end a decision has
been made.
~~
-z-
•
o March 23 through March 27, 1987, hearings on CIAC issues. A
Commission decision is not expected until mid-1987.
The company ha• established a separate account for the
monies collected in association with the tax. In the avant that
any refunds era warrasted a• a result of the CPQC's decision,
Edison will return the excess contributions.
Until the company receives further guidance Tram the CYOC
and further clarification from the Internal nevanne Searoice, the
income tax component will be added to tW costs of your protects
which are affected by thi^ tax.
If you have any questions on this matter, please call a at
711-917-8223.
C.."/M7~I
CMryl Rams
Area Manager
CAR:cd
•
•
/9
RESOLUTION N0. ~~ -~ys
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COIMCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO
CUCAMOIISf1, AMENDING RESOLUTION N0. 86-143 ESTABLISHING
FEES IN-LIEU OF UNOERGROUIDING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
NHEN REWIRED BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL
NHEREAS, the City is in receipt of iMormatton from the
Southern California Edison Company indicating that the average cast of
underground/ng electrical lines has increased due to provisions of the
1986 Income Tax Reform Act.
NON, THEREFORE, be it resoived, by the C1ty Council 0/ the C1Ly
of Rancho Cucaaonga, California that the unit amount to be charged for
fees in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead electrical Hnes shall
be f167.00 per 1lnear foot. The amounts for the other ut111ties shall
remain at the curcent rate of 575,00 for telephone and f10.00 for Cable
Tv.
'~ / ~
r~
~~
J
~•~ .. vwmavnvn GL
STAFF REPORT ~,. ~ ,
oy
GATE: May 20, 1987 ~
T0: City Council and City Manager I '~
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Award the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and
Roadway Improvement Protect to Vance Corporation, for the
mount of f1, 628,411.85.
REaaBOia-Tla:
[t is recommended that the City Louncil accept all bids as submitted and
award the contract for the Baker Avenue and Arcow Route Stona Dra1n and
Roadway ImproveaMt Prolect to the lowest responsible Didder, Yance
Corporation for the aamunt of (1,628,411.85, (sumaatlon of schedules 1,
2A and 28).
Background/Analysts
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on
May 15, 1987, for the sub,)ect protect. Vance Corporation is the aDParent
lowest responsible bidder with a bid aaount of f1, 628,411.85 (see
attached bid suawary). The Engineer's estimate was f1, 739,833 for
Alternate A and f1,779,133.00 for Alternate B. Staff has reviewed ail
bids received and found thew to M rnwnlor. ,rn i.. ^~."trte .., t.". t.`,c
bid requirements. Staff has campleteA the required background
investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid
documents.
Respe y ted, ~
RHM: A:~A
Attachment
1
r1
U
•
N O ~ m ~'
O
Q ` F ~ A IG
N (~ }! r \ 8 qW r r
S T~ Ti O ~ O S$ O N N
~1 ~ r A N N +1 •1 '1 1 ~^Tjl
T i1 ~1 N tit
T VI G
N ~ ° Wvt \ y~ r r r
N H O N q N H O P O~ tNy O
N V q H ~ W Y O N q
14 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '^
8 8 8 ~ H S 8 8 8 8 8 8
u w v N \ \ .. r r Y
T W ~ ~ N ~ F^
?3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ R
8 $ 8 g S 2t 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 0
°
o O N N N N N Y1 r r
S S H H S H H S O H N N
SN SJ 8 N yeN~ yO\ 8\ ~t 88b 1 8O 8O
O O O U O G O 0 0 ~ H H
H S H 8 8 8 8 8 8 H H H
O ~ Q y
y
a ~
off/ /~
O V i T aaq~ r O q 0 w N
` M
~I
~ ~ ~ y
W 1 i
s
y y y w w w w i • ~
'a Li 0{ 8f r N r~ s .. ~ w ~ ,~~' "~ r C
e 's a 's s~~ a~ a a a z~ s s 'a 's
u N • a • w .•i a r. ~ a r f r w
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 8'
i = a a u N .yam y~ Q yWy~~ `0 11vy' a~a w V a .W.
H S S H day Y ~ W p a~ N a VI w~ r a H
s yWp wVy • yw y~y N N YY EO ww ysV~ 8 N ~yy
i ~ O N V ~ F N ~ N O N N` N~ O
a s s s a a a a s R 70 R n g~ Q g$
H a G V w W O Y a O O O N O S C
H H H H H a a H H H$ 8 H a H H H H
$ N v wYY ZE ~ $N • jai w Q• ~i N•(
a ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ O ~ ~ O ~ a ~ a ~ ~ a
.Cp G .p .pp p .pp .pp
8 E O O a S O O A O O a B O O O O O
•
/ /~'
n
U
•
c' ~
~ .°i ~- S e 0 q Y' N
~~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~~ ~a ~ ~ r ~ a ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ g~' ~ ~ -
4 1~ `r!~ ~ d ~ N
~Y~ °r ~ 1 q rG i .] r i
l Ir .{j i
r H N N r VW qp V r pn H r -
N O O IA ~1 ~ T N G O O X X X r ~ _
r r X X X r N N -
+1 ~1 ! ! ~ ! T T T ! ! ! !~ _
y yw~ q y 1y ~y yNy1
r yW~ V p q N r Y yN~ ~ ~ q N v N
~ 8 O 8 8 8 H N N 8 pO S S 8 8 S
N N W Y N W N N V O q N q
M e ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ffi 8 8 8 B 8 B 8 s
y ~y 8N w S wq SN y
r Y i V N ~ N r q Y w ~ N O ~ V G
8 '8 8 8 8 8 '.^ 8 y8 M 8 8 8 8 8 8
q ~ 1 M N W N p N W N N
~ ~ o ~ ~
. . . . . . .
8 8 8 R R R R R Q G '~ g o 0 0
Q y y; y~ p ~Wi
r $ $' Y 8 3 a r ~ o q ~ a Q $ 6
. . . . . . .
:^ 8 8 8 S 8 8 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
N b N N J O q q ~ ~ Y N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. . . . . . .
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
aim
p N r O N S P N ~ 4N1 N i O V
~~ s~ ~~~ $~~ ~ ~ r~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 3r~ ~ _
~w vn ~w 3w w w n n n w w w w n ~s
_~ i3
s
N r Tw ~w1 N w w w .- ., 1. y1 r. ~ r r
T ) ~~ T r ~ S T P e r N N
' +I r +~ ' +~ r •'~
~ ~
y~ Y y~ yy~ O441 P
8 S a S a S ~i ~ ~ ~ H ~ =i ~ r r
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S N N L
} W M ~ W O w N ~ O S W
' ' " '
a s a s S s a s S s s s S s a s=
1 u w w w
y
O
8
8 4
a g
~
8
R y
R
~
=
n
~
S
~
r
r
S S S 5 S S S S S S S S' S S ~ i~
O W N 1.
~
O W y
O N
N ~ V O H • P
S
O S ~ 8
O yp
yp
V 8
O ~ R
O Q
N ~ ~ ~ r•
~
O ~ 1p~
G N •:
g •
p
A
4
w
o
o
0
~
o
g .
g
e
e
a
b ~-
~ W ~ N
8
O 8
O pp
O
~ S
O Q
a
H yp
O ~yy~
O spy
G spy
V
M y
O
N
-
S S S H S S S S S S S S S S N N N
O W N I
I O y
O e
4 ~ y
~
SN y
G N N
-J
8
O 8
O S
G S
O 8
S
S
8
•
~ 8
V yp
O
•
O
• sp
O
• p{
V
• y
p
O
~
• 8
O 8
O
. .
S
S
S •p
O •
S
S •
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S _
S
•
~/ D
8 8 ~ m
V
m
4 _
~ & i
R ~
t '•~
t =
a ~S
sa ~ y
~~
w t
~
,7
i
4 nn
~~ n
~ n
~ ~Qn
lR $Q Qn
3R nyn
~~j -n
•'~ den
r
nw
Y
~~
w
i
~w
~
~
~
w
~
~
r
~~
e T
w
~
7
ii
~
Z~ 6
w~
~~
~~
W~
W
+
~
~_
~
y f y
~
f j M
i±
'JQQ~
~
1
O
ti Ca
OO
~o
N
~ fNw
in ti.
n
Y y
q
•
1 ~ ~ • r
A
~
p_
n ~ w
7 a a
TV /W1~ r
N W
~ Y
~ W
~ N
~ V
CN /
~ O
~ N
~ ~pNy
r Y
~ uqn
8 TW
) ~
~ p
~
f
W
r T T N
w T
N
N N r q
N H V N p
O Vp
O V yq~
O O ~ ~ N 8
H C
O N P V 8 8 ~ 8 8 H q
O 8 H 8 H 8 8
W I
Y W ry
Y
l V N y
a 1R
M ~sy
q pp
G 1r
~
O Y
V q
N V
p qy
V N E
O pq
V yp
O yy~1
O ~ q
M qm
G pq
O H
8 H p
O p
O p
O p
O H p
O p
O p
O p
O p
O 8 p
O O H p
V p
O
N M YI
~. ~ r .. CC Y s ~ '~d ~ ~'
S ~'
8 8 N O v O S S 8 ,
8 8 s
M ,
S YVI 8 8 8 H
•
O O N ~ V N Y VI
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 H 8 8 8 8 8 8 $
y~
b
~
r
8
~
N Np
4 ~Q
1Q ~i
a
o y
f
.n
~ QNQ
S pN
O Q
3
H 8 ~ 8 N H p
p S H 8 8 8 H H H H H p
O
W W W N N ~ N N O y
W p
~
(
S ~(
a i
l~ 8
O !
Q
Y
~ QQ
as S Q
a 4
a ~ ~ Q
Q
as ~ ~ ~
$
8 p
O p
O p
O p
O C
O O p
O C
O C
O C
O p
O G
O O G
O G
O p
O
l /~
~~ ~ W a~ - a d s x
=
A q
a A
w ~
O
Y 2w
~~ ~
O w
~Y n 8
i
O ~7f
7 ..
wi '~
8 ~ 38
~
r
d ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'J ~
33 M
n s
~ ! ~ ! a
e
n ~
S p
N ~
~
N
~
~ n
~
~
N
N
N
N
w w :~
$J
O
r ~y
a
'W" q
~
Tw
r
r
r
r
8 :A 8 8 $ 8 N N N N
n
~
N
~
~
a
n
~
~
~
q
~
~1
~
~
w
i
N
~ M
~
e
.
i MM
N
~
a p
p
~
: i : X 8 8 $ 8 . e . e 8 s 8 g
~yV
a
r r~
^
~ YN
Y
~i
r
r
r
r
8 M 8 8 8 8 N N N N
n H
g
~ ^ p
N
n p
NpNV
O `p
`pN
V
.
a
~
~ N
~ y
ppyN
O
~ W
qq
O S
8
a V
yp
V
q
N S
S
O
B a s • 8 8 8 ft ! Q i a o 0 0
t
2 h{
p
a r y~
a y
a Q ~$ r r r r
8 N 8 $ 8 $ N N N N
8 M ~ 8 21 M o a yMM
i bl ~ o 15 'd
A s a e a 8 s s e 's s 8 8 s s s
~,
~/ ~
J
o ti o
F ~ F
i "
8 $ 8
s ~ a
a v 'o
~ ~ ~
~ ~
yV 8N
O Op
O
8V ypM e~
O O V
S S S
g ~
8 8 8
f
H A
t
Q
s
9
v
E
1
.. 8
s
Ct q A
r N
S °
8
~/
nrmv nc n ~ yin yin n
STAFF REPORT ~ ",,..NO,~
~,
DATE: MaY 20, 1987 fl rp
T0: City Council and City Manager 19
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security (Letter of Credit) for Tract 10246, located on the
southwest corner of Hillside Road, submitted by Luther
A ikhaseh
RECOMMF1101TIg1
•
It is recometended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
aDDroving Tract 10246, accepting the subject agreement and security and
authorizing the Mayor and City Cierk to sign said agreement and to cause
said map to record.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Tract 10246 located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven
Avenue, in the very low Development District, was approved by the Planning
Commission on June 9, 1982, for the division of 10 acres into 16 lots.
The Developer, Luther Alkhaseh, is submitting an agreement and security
(Letter of Credit) to guarantee the construction of the off-site
improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: f118,000
Labor and Material Bond: f69,000
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's
Office.
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary
school districts and Cucmnonga Lounty Mater District. C.C.6R.'s have also
been approved by the City Attorney.
Respe t y submitted,
R ,
Attachments
as
• RESOLUTION M0. p 7 " d f"/So
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO
CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL AMP Of TRACT N0. 10246
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract Mo. 10246, consisting of 16 lots,
suhaitted by Luther Alkhaseh, Subdivider, located on the southwest corner of
Hillside Road and Haven Avenue has been subaitted to the City of Rancho
Cucanonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the
Subdivision Map Act of the State of Ca1HorMa, and in caagllance with the
requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to aawK the requtrewents established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the
Improvea~ent Agraamant submitted herewith for approval and esewtian by said
City, together wftA good and sufficient Improveamnt Security, and submits for
approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets
delineated thereon.
NOiI, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYEO by the City Council of Lhe City of
Rancho Cucaaonga, California, as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreawent be and the sage 1s
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute sane
on behalf of said City and the Ctty Clerk is
authorized to attest thereto; and
2. That said Ingravement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to approval as to Iorm and
content thereof by the City Attorney; and
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating sane b! approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on
behalf of said Cfty.
a3
nrmv nc. n ~ wrn vn n,.n ~ vnwrn .
•
STAFF REPORT ~~ `~M ~+.
~ ;~:
GATE: May 20, 1987 ,`~-,~ iii
T0; City Council and City Manager ivn
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ADProval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for
Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7646, located on the south side of
Hillside Road, Nest of Beryl Street, submitted by Dominic
Brucato
RecaMMelana
It is recommended that the City Connell adopt the attached resolution
accepting the subJect agreamant and security and authorizing the Mayor and
City Clerk to sign said agreement.
A1111LYS I S/B1ICKDROUN D
•
The Developer, Dominic Brucato, is suhnttting an agreement and security to
guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements far parcel 1 of
Parcel Map 7646, in the folloNing amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: 52,800
Labor and Material Bond: (1,400
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's
Office.
Respectf submitted,
RHM. :dl
Rttachments
r' ~
a~
1
~..~..
_. I i ~ i ~ i
r ; i I I c., I I ,
a) : 1 ~
I
• ~ I
•~r~o
CITY OF
BANCHO CUCAMONGA
8NOB4EERIIVO DMBtON
.o.. .
--,.m:
~`~
.rws.~
•rNO
1
___. . ~~u _
~ Y .u r
G
r-
rrs~c
~~ PARCEL MAP 7646. Parcel I
E7®811~
~S
• RESOLUTION N0. S7'~I/7
A RESOLUTIQi OF THE CITV CODICIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMOIIOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT A6REEMEN7
ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY fOR PARCEL I OF PARCEL M4P 7646
WHEREAS, the Lity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on May
4, 1987, by Dominic Brucato as developer, for the improvemient of pubiic right-
of-way adJacent to tM1e real property specifically described therein, and
generally located on the south side of Hillside Road, west of Beryl Street;
and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
improvement Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said real Droperty; and
WHERE115, said Improvement Agreement is secured and aecomganied by
good and sufficlant Improvement Security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Dy the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
• Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on Dehalt of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and tM1e City Clerk to attest thereto.
aro
rrmv nc. n w wrnvn nr rn ~ ,rnwrn ,
n
U
STAFF REPORT
a
< 1'
Ile
DATE: May ZD, 1987
TD: C1ty Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer
8T: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civ11 Engineer
Uli ~
19%i ~
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreoent for Installation of Public Issproveeent
and Dedication between Paul Aparlclo and Ida ApaMC1o and the
C1ty of Rancho Cucaanga for Skeet Frontage Iaproreeents at
8512 Arrow Route
It is raeaa~anded tMt Cfty Council adopt the attaehed Resolution
approving tM Agreaaunt for InsUllatlon of Pubtte Ieprovaeent and
Dedlcatlan DetweM Paul Apariclo and Ids Aparlcto and the C1ty of Rancho
Cucawonga.
The attached suDJect Agraaawatt between the C1ty end Paul Apartcto and
TAi a~a./r/n nrny/Me Inr ef,wf I~nmv~rntc rh1rA lnriuM runha;
gutter's, sidewalks, drive appraches, street lights and street paveawmts
along Apariclo's Arrow Roue Frontage. The Apsricios have agreed t0
grant to the City a Roadway Easeaent to allow for tM widening and
i~proveswmt of Arrow Route to roturn for the construction of said
lwproveswmts.
Said street loprovsents w111 be constructed 1n conJunctlon wttt: the
City's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Store Ora1n and Street Isryroveeent
Protect.
Respectfutl suMaltted,
:ko
Attacheents
a~
J
I~
I i
I Y
~ i I ~ .\
/O/'
~ , \V~ i ~ ' i ~.
Z
~cmc ~~
I
~ ~ D
.,.
` j ~ '~ 00>BL
i
'~ ,
, I i
~
~ ~ ~ N CN Cd
~ ~ ~
'I :1 vL fL~. W
-- - ,I ~
~ ~
~~_
-
;
~~ I a
~
1 '
:
~ /
~ W
N i 'I~
I NJ
I
~ ~ ~
I 6
=/A dO>f ~j ~ I
91[ r9t I .
i A
I i ' 1
~.
m
Il ly
C
u
u
0
~~ ~ _ 4 NON dd
I
/iPECr;n ^~~~~' :•8/ I u ~ ,cd~a3.roJdnr~aa /
h ~ ~ 1_ W y ~ 7olGN'3d J d OiY3
G .tip ~ p t~ N n CO ~ °lZ
ZZ ~~ h I ~S~NQN J ;~
i J y 1 q y '\ ~
~~ /~T~"M ~~ i~.~~ I' / dJ'3 6/ds ~SZ ~~,
w > ~".~ I~In ~ ~ .400
i
_._r ~.._. i--
~ ,
1 ~
~~., ICJ" /~
_ ~_~
I ~- ~ r?(~l~~ ,-vim..: '~'"~~~~ ~. I °~ 0
RESOLUTION N0. S ~ '~~/ ~
• A RESOLUTION ff THE CITY COUNCIL ff THE CITY ff RANCHO
CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIM6 AN AGREEMENT FOR
IIKTALLIITION ff PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT Alp DEDICATION FROM
PAUL APARICIO AND IDA APARICIO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERR TO SIGN SINE
NHEREAS, the C1q Clerk of the Ciq of Rancho Cucaawnga to establish
rcquirpaents for construcLlon of frontage iag7rorwents in coniunction with the
Baker Avenw and Arrow Route Stone Dra1n and Street Ieproreawnt Pro~ett; and
NHEREAS, insUllatlan of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk,
street 1lghes and stmt paveswMts located at 8512 Arrow Route, to be wade
part of tM Raker Avenw and Arrow Route Stone Drain and Street Inproreaxrot
Protect; and
NNEREAS, Paul Apariclo and IG Apariclo have agreed to dedicate
Right-of-NRy as nl~ursawent to the C1q far said laproraRants.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tM Ciq Council of LIN Ciq of
Rancho Cutaonga, Callfornla, dws accept sald Iagroraant Agraaaamt,
authorizes tM NRyor and the Ciq Clerk to sign sae, and directs the C1q
Clerk to record sae 1n tM Offlee of the Coungr Recorder of San Bernardlm
Counq, Callforota.
•
~\/ f ~
' /T
a9
n,mv nc n w morn vn rn m~ ~enwrn w
U
STAFF REPORT
GATE May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Beane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer
y~ L~.v... VA.
< ~l ~'
:~
~~ x
~; ~
19." ~
SUBJECT: Award and execution of a Professional Services Agreesknt with
the fins of Hackett 6 Kramer, Inc. to prepare construction
of VineyardiAvenueonfrdm ArrowiROUte torFoo hirllaBoulevard.
The fee asxlunL of f14,50o plus lOZ contingency will be funded
free Lhe Systsas Development Fund.
RECOMEIOATI011:
•
It is recasssended that C1ty Council award and execute a Professional
Services Agreesxnt with Hackett 8 Kramer, Inc. to prepare construction
Avenue fro~miAirrowiRoutentoeFooth111 Boulevard~haThe feetesauntVforythe
required services 1s proposed at (14,500 plus a lOf contingency.
Funding for the project will be provided from the Systeas Development
!~~-A
BACI(9101/D/Al11lYSIS:
It is necessary to engage the services of a qualified design engineering
fins to prepare construction plans, specifications and estimates for the
RehaDilitatton of Vineyard Avenue from Arrow Route to Footh111
Boulevard.
A Request for Proposal was prepared and sent to four (4) engineering
fleas with the yyualificattons and experience to provide the required
services. The fines were N115on, Inc. - Sheehan 8 Associates, L.A.
Matnscott 8 Associates, Ludwig Engineering and Hackett 8 Kramer, Inc.
Letters were received Eras L.A. Mainscott d Associates and Ludwig
Engineering expressing regrets that their present work load mould not
permit completion of the protect to a timely manner. Proposals were
received from Wilson, Inc. - Sheehan, 8 Associates and Hackett 8
Kramer, Inc.
After review and evaluation of the proposals, the recossrAnded fires was
selected based primarily on the proposed scope of work, design approach
and time schedule. The recasasended fins also proposed the tower fee of
f14,500.00 compared t0 (18,755.00 for Mtison-Inc. - Sheehan 8
ASSOC1ailS.
30
ctrr wuRCa STAFF aEPOar
ae: vtk'ErARD AVENUE
Mar 20, t9e~
Page 2
Based on the proposed protect schedule, iL 1s antlctpated that the
protect r111 be ready for authorization to advertise far constructfon
bids on August 5, 1987. Prlor to this contract, tarter 6 Associatrs of
San Diego vas engaged by a einor purchase order to perforei eoeprehensire
pavaa~nt eraluat on.
Res 1 sub~ltted,
RIM: :ko
Attaeheents
-~ J
u
~/
RESOLUTION N0. 8 7 ~yy9
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY ff RANCHO
CUCAMON611 TO ANARD AND EXECUTE A PROFESS[ONK SERVICES
AtlIEEMENT XITH NACKETT AND KRANZER, INC. TO PREPARE
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND EST1M11TE5 FOR THE
REHABILITATION OF VINEYARD AVENUE FROM AKRON ROUTE TO
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
NHEREAS, the C1ty Council of the Ct;y of Rancho Cucaawnga desires to
have prepared construction plans, specifications and estlaates for the
Rehabilitation of Vineyard Avenue fray Arrow Route m Foothill Boulevard; and
NiRiREAS, Nackatt i Kranzar, Inc., by subdtting a proposal letter to
response to a request for Droposals frog the C1ty, has wba~tttad evidence of
qualification and is willing to psrfons such services for a fee.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT gE50LYE0 by tM City Gouncfl of tM C1ty of
Random Cucaronga to accept, award and otherwise exacuU a Professional
Services Agrea~ant with Hacbtt i Kramer, Inc. for the preparation of
constructian plans, speelfltatlons and estleatas for tM Rahab111tat/an of
Vineyard Avenue free Arrow Roue to Faoth111 Boulevard 1n the aaouM of
f14,500 to be paid free Systw Derelopeent Funds.
1N ADDITION, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Cauncll of tM C1>;y of Rancho
• Cucaaonga t0 establish a contingency fund of 10f of the aaxwnt of said
agreewlant or 51,450.00 to be used 1n tM avant of extra work or change order,
to 6e adrinistered by staff.
3a
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhiONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1981
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer
By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
.dP c~
~ i ~'..
~;>
~i t
T Q A
F.I U Z
Iv- 1
SUBJECT: Ruthorizing the receipt of proposals for Maintenance of Traffic
Signals under the provisions established by the Streets and
Mighwa,ys Code for Public Morks Maintenance
It is recoaanended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to receive
proposals for Maintenance of Traffic Signals. A qualified company will be
selected on the basis of denronstratfng the capability to perfona said
maintenance efficiently, quickly and safely in accordance with guidelines and
standards established by the State.
B11CK6ROIMD/A1NL1/SIS:
Tl.g r~~~ h.: ~,.~y e~_en . ~.~,.~ ,...lifer s ...i.,.e..,.._e ,... ~.. ,...n1iC fa l':'..C
._
such as traffic signals. ~Ln~order to maintain the standard, selection of
responsible firms is of utmost importance. The present trends of liability
claims demand effective and continual maintenance to insure that existing
traffic signals are to good condition.
The City Attorney has instructed staff that the provision of "advertising" to
seek bids does not apply to the selection process for maintenance of existing
public works facilities. Therefore, staff will be contacting selected
companies that are Doth responsible and competitive.
Res c subnitted,
r ,
a ~c
33
•
CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONi;A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1981
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
<~-~`~
F Z
,, >
19"
SUBJECT: Authorizing the receipt of proposals for Maintenance of Street
Striping and Stencil Marking under provisions esta611shed by the
Streets and Highways Cade for Public Morks Maintenance
RECOMIBICY1TI011:
It is recoanxnded that the City Council authorize the City Cterk to receive
proposals for Maintenance of Street Striping and Stencil Marking. A qualified
company will be selected on the basis of denronstrating the capability to
perform said maintenance efficiently, quickly and safely in accordance with
guidelines and standards established 6y the State.
BAti(9lUINIt/Ae111LTSIS:
The City has continued a high quality of maintenance on existing public
facilities. Such as street stri Dina anA ctanetl marktnn In ore"r ~,. m.tn~.~"
this standard, selection of the maintenance firms that have demonstrated a
high standard of prompt, safe and thorough performance is of utmost
importance. The present trends of liability claims demand effectfve and
constant maintenance to insure that existing traffic controls are in good
condition and prominently visible.
The City Attorney has instructed staff that the provision of "advertising" to
seek Dids does not apply to the seiection process for maintenance of existing
public works facilities. Therefore, staff will be contacting selected
companies for consideratf on of contract execution that are responsible and
competitive.
Res submitted,
3y
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Gideon V. Agra, Junior CTvtl Engineer
LL C.1JipY^
t~' ~
~- ~ ~°
5~~~
~i ~~~~>
ie-c
SBBJECT: Approval and execution of Professional Services Agreement between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Psamas 8 Associates for the
Preparation of Bench Mark and Horizontal Control Aetworks Survey
and Aerial and Geobase Mapping for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
surrounding areas in an aeount not to exceed (510,000.00 to be
funded Tram Systems Development Funds.
IL is recommended that City Council approve the attached Professional Services
Agroement for the Preparation of Bench Mark and Horizontal Control Networks
Survey and Aerial and 6eobase Mapping of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to an
amount not t0 exceed f510,000.00 to be funded from Systems Development Funds.
• e/ll]IHllll~l/111YLT515:
On March 23, 1987, the top five (5) firma amwig the twelve (12) engineering
f',rms who submitted Letters of Interest and Qualifications for the C1ty-wide
•`-, .l ..d T- - Lt. Yu it i'~u~~.-.t ~I~i t~.d ~~iir ~J~
°y~g• ~Y YY ~x J w p, iwt
proposal containtng both the scope of workings and rotect schedule before~a
5-member selection panel formed by three City staffP and two representatives
from the County of San Bernardino and Riverside County Ftood Control
District. The proposals received were reviewed and ranked by qualifications
by means of established scope of work sheet to ensure meeting the desirable
protect requirements. As a result of the evaluation process, it was the
cameittee's consensus to recommend Psamas 6 Associates, as the most qualified
to be engaged by the City for such a protect. The fees received from the
firms are listed. Due to the size of the protect, the fee was negotiated with
P somas 6 Associates to a minimum.
FJ
The planned approach by Psomas 6 Associates to this protect consists of
conducting horizontal and vertical ground control surveys, setting up a Dench
mark network for the C1ty, obtaining aerial photography suitable for stereo
mapping, preparing topographic base map sheets, photo mosaic maps and
furnishing digital electronic data for the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga's
Geographic Infornwtlon System.
Respect submitted,
~^~
:ko
Attachments
J J
CITY 0% RANCHO COCANON5A
AERIAL iDPOSRAPNIC AND WNTOOB NAPFIN6
1 NMICN ZS, 1981 1
SCORE SNEEi SDXNARY
•
CONSOL1ANf YAILY SiIL SCANS YALT iN6Ni0
PSOMS E ASS~IATES 4S 4Z 8 47 1431
S51 CONSOLTAMTS 29 47 11 34 1311
Y.E. SLAYELY E ASAOCIA7E4 ZB 33 S9 3i 1711
MILLOM ASSCCIATE9 27 A 31 31
ASl COMSOLTIMI ERINEEA7 n Sf 37 SS 1341
i6TRt AVFRp6E FFF PR3P05A1
I78 N.7 1530000.00
I71 37.77 f7I9390, 00
137 33.77 1495970.00
137 3J fA74010.00
I37 37 1717000.00
1 CONSUITAMT4 YEAS RAMfEO ACCOAO1NSlY FRgI TIE N16NFST AUIIFA Oi ACCDNDLRTEO SCORES
3~
RESOLUTION N0. S ~ -a'S~
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDN611 TO ANARD AND EKECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AfAEElENT NITH PSOMAS d ASSOCIATES TO PREPAIIE BENCH MARK
AND HORI2~ITAL CONTRd. NETiAIRKS AND AERIAL AND GEOBASE
MAPPING OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlKIIN1A AMD SURROUNDING
AREAS
NHEREAS, the Ctty of Rancho Cucasonga desires to obtain accurate
bench larks and aerial photography suitable for preparing photo axlsalc saps,
infogieation forethe C1ty'ss6eographicaInfogrsationaSystse andwveral layers of
IAIEREAS, an enginaeri~, wrveying and planningy f1r•, Psosus 8
Associates, specializing in the fields of surveyl~, sapping aM 6ggraphlc
lnforwaeton Systss have, in rosponse to a Repuest for Proposal, lndlcatM
desire to perfona such services and dagrwtnad to suet tM iusds of the
suWect probed in prodding a high lwel of technical service, experienced
prWect sunagasunt and gwltfted and experienced staff for a fee.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the C1ty Council of the C1ty of
Rancho Cucaaanga does resolve td arard and execute the Professional Smrices
Agreeax!nt be4+een the City of Rancho Cutaaxmga and Psaa>.s J• Assatates for the
• Preparation of Bench Marks snd Horizontal Control Networks Survey, and Aer1a1
and Geobase Mapping of the Ctty of Rancho Cucaaonga including its wrrounding
areas for a fee not to exceed f530,000.00.
37
•
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA.MONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Mannger
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, L1ty Engineer
BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, AssisUnt C1vi1 Engineer
~,~u.~jih
~ ~
`~~.
~i
cr,
f ~
19.'
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreeaxnt for Installation of Public Iaproveaient
and Dedication between Brad Downey and the C1ty of Rancho
Cucaeonga for Street Frontage Ia~prove~ents at 8530 AROw
Route
MECODEIaATI01•
tt 1s racoaaaNided that City Council adopt the attached Resolution
approving Lhe Agresent for Installation of Public Iproveeent and
Dedication between Brad Downey and the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga.
The attached subiKt Agreeaxnt between tM City and Brad Rowney provides
for street improvements whicA include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive
annrvu~h~~ ~f,wi linAle ynA Nrrt ~_ .nee •l nwn Y.. ~...~,._..~~ ~.w
Route Frontage. Mr. Downey has agreed to grant to the C1ty a Roadway
Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of Arrow Route in
return for the construction of sold improvements.
Sa1d street improvemMts will be constructed 1n con~uncttan with the
City's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Stone Drain and Street Improvement
P ro~ett.
Res ec lly submitted,
r
!L H•
Attachakn is
_~ ~
~ ?fix
• ~ ~ `~
II 12 13
207- P LAN SCAT
.
2a/- ,QO,
~ /,
P2 2
CURB 2E7URN ~ 207-20/-2/ 207-cb/-03 A 2o7-2C'
d • 90• QQ x COWNEY '~
L~ 42.6/' V ~' n
A
r- 27 00'
3 i
.
~,
207-20/-/ ~ h
Jo/N l~
Q
n
JO/N
~ .
Q.. ~
. I ~ - _ _-
n /Q h
it 'lJ V ,r ii
l~~. N ~L
-~.
y K jai
t'. ~J
207-2G/-a6 oli a
cues zErueu ~' V
d- SO° y~ I.
~. a2 a/' `~ ~ W W
7-2Z 00' 0 ~ ~
NOS
k ARROW
y.
n,
T~
x
0
~° 39
~v~
RESOLUTION N0. S7"aSi
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMCNO
CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOIL
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROYEIENT AND OEOIGITION FROM
BRAD DOIREY AID AUfiIORIZiN6 THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGH SAME
NHEREAS, the Ctty Clerk of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaaonga to estaDllsh
requlresents for construction of fronUge iproresents fn cae~mxtlon xith the
Baker Avenue and Arror RouU SUra Drain and Street Iprovenant Project; and
MHEREAS, instillation of curb, gutUr, drive approach, sldnralk,
street itghts and street paveswmts located at 8530 Arrow RouU, to be code
part of the Baker Avenue and Arror RouU SUra Drain and Street Iproresent
Pro,~ect; and
NHEREAS, Brad Downey Ms agreed U dad/uU Right-of-NAy as
relebursanent to the C1ty for said lproveeents.
NOw, TIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED LMt the city Caw~e11 of ae City of
Caltfornla, dos attept said Iproveaxnt Agresnant,
Rancho Cuc~ang~,
authorlus tM Maryor and the City Clerk U sign sao, and dlraets Lhe C1ty
Clerk U record saes to the Offiu of the County Reeordsr of San &rMrdlm
County, California.
•
/n
n
U
C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
To: City Council and Ctty Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, C1ty Engineer
BY: Lud nda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer
~p ~CCw.NO
~C 7
~, :~
>f A
fi ~ z
.. >
19. C
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreeeent for Installation of Dub11c Iaproveaw:nt
and Dedication between Jennie Chloinl, Riccardo CA1o1n1 and
John Chloini and the City of Rancho Cucaleonga for Street
Frontage Ieprovsents at 8598 and 8600 Arrow Route
[t is reconalnded that City Connell adapt the attached Resolution
approving the AgreaawMt for tnstallation of Pub11c tiaproveawmt and
Dedicatian between Jennie CAtotnt, Riccardo CMoin1 and John Chloinl and
the C1ty of Rancho Cucasonga.
BACII®10UR0/AINLYSIS:
The attached subject Agreesent between the City and Jennie Chloinl,
niccaruu Cnioini and Jonn Cnioini provides for scrcec ia~proveaknu wmcn
Snclude curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and
street pavements along Chtoinl's Arrow Route Fron~age. The Chtolnis
have agreed to grant to the City a Rusawgy Easement ta eiiow (or the
widening and improvtwent of Arrow Route in return for the construction
of said improvements.
Said street improvements will b! constructed in con~unctlen with the
City's Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Stone Drain and Street Improvement
P ro,~ect.
Res f y submitted,
R .~EH:I
Attachments
T/
,.
~`
3C!!LE
15 ~ 16 I7
2 ~ o
v-2~ r 2o~-2oro7r 2 ~,
rm 20F7-?0/-oG CHIOINI mm 207-20/-3 a 207-20/-
4 207-20/-Pg Ik Ik ~S i 17 Im
W' ~ ~ .. i
.N M ~ l~ ~t
3 ;C ~
a ~~3 oa N~ ~ ,~ 3 ro
~~ n,Q, . 3 ~ e~ ~ g+3
' y-G _ ~- j
_~ - - ~ ~ ~~
„ h'~
a°
\~. I
~ ROUTE
~'_- ~_ -
r T--~ ~, ~~ R_!ua
I ~ "~
i
~'~ ~~ 207-2=
• ~.>
I ~'"
I ~' ~~1
~a
MA020NE AVENUE
ResaurlDN No. 8 7~ a 5 a
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO
CUCAMDMGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN A6IIEENENT FOR
INSTALLATIpI OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM
JENN[E CNIOINI, RICCARDO CHIOINI, AND JOHN CNIOINI AND
AUTHORIZING THE lY1YOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
NHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Raneho Cucaaanga m estaDltsh
rer•ulraents for construction of frontage teproveaents in conluncttan with the
Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Smra Drain and Street Ieprovsent Protect; and
NINiREAS, tnstallatlon of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk,
street lights and street pavenents Located at 8598 and 8600 Arrow Route, m ee
aside part of the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Sinew Drain and Street
IaproveaenL Project; and
NNEREAS, Jarnle Chtolnl, Riccardo Ch1o1n1 aM John Ch1o1M have
agreed m dedicate Right-of-Wy as reiabursaeent m tM Ctty for said
laproveaants.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tMt tM City Connell of the City of
Raneho Cucaaanga, California, does accept said Iepmveeent AgreMMt,
autharizes the M;yor and the City Clerk m sign sae, and dlrecu the Ctq~
• Gle.^!! m rocord sae to tM Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
~T
i
~3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Request that City Council grant staff permission to obtain
quotes for two appraisals for each property owner along Arrow
Route within the limits of the Baker-Arrow Project who have
not yet dedicated, authorize and direct the City Attorney to
proceed with Eminent Domain proceedings and direct staff to
proceed with short fana action of Chapter 21 of the
Improvement Act of 1911 for the assessment of the cost for
frontage improvements
• It is recommended that City Council grant staff permission to obtain
quotes from two (2) consulting appraisers for appraisals of the five {5)
parcels along Arrow Route, authorize and direct the City Attorney. to
proceed with Eminent Domain proceedings and direct staff to proceed with
short form action of Chapter 27 to assess the five (5) property owners
who have not voluntarily dedicated for the cost of their frontage
improvements.
At the present time, 82% of the property owners on Arrow Route within
the proiect limits have signed Agreements for Installation of Public
Improvements and Dedication and Easement Oeed documents. The frontage
improvements to be provided are curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive
approaches, street trees, street lights and parking lane pavements
For those property owners who have not yet dedicated, of which there are
five (5) out of twenty-eight, an Eminent Canain action is to be taken to
acquire the property needed to widen grrow Route [o its ultimate width
within tha proiect limits. At this time, staff requests permission to
ohtain quotes from two consulting appraisers for the appraisal of each
of the five following properties:
19~"
1) APN 207-201-20 (8618 Arrow Route)
2) APN 207-262-39 ((8563 Arrow Route
)
)
4; APN 207-261-91 (8529 Rrrow Route)
5) APN 207-591-29 (8488 Arrow Route)
.~ ~~ICwa+o'~
F~ `~
~y
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
i~rai~lEila-Tloll:
L~Uxip
~,
i ~
F 2
:J., >
ro-,-
The required street ingrovements for Tract 12739 have been completed in
an acceptable manner and it is rcconaaended that City Councii accept said
improvtaxnts, accept the Maintenanu Guarantee Bond fn the mount of
f20,900.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in
the amount of 2209,000.00.
Background/gnalysis
Tract 12739 - Located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Center
Avenue.
uIiVLD1, L1.~ DCtI 41 GC1~ 101411 C,i
145 West Main Street
Tustin, CA 92680
gccept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 220,900.00
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 2209,000.00
Respectf y submitted,
l
G
R w
v~
0
c~
X.
G
ti
s
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~~ra•'NO,+h
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1981 19
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant C1vii Engineer ~
SUBJECT: Request that City Council grant staff permission to obtain
Routes ithinwtheplimitssofothea8aker Arrw ProlectowhoAha e
not yet dedicated, authorize and direct the City Attorney to
proceed with Eminent Damafn proceedings and direct staff to
proceed with short form action of Chapter 27 of the
Improvement Act of 1911 for the assessment of the cost for
frontage improvements
IL is recommended that Ctty Council grant staff permission to qh?~:n
quotas from two (2) consulting appraisers for aDOra+se'a cs the flue (5)
parcels along Arrow Route, authorize sad direct the City Attorney to
proceed with Eminent Domrl.^. :aceedings and direct staff to proceed with
short forte ?=tisr~ or Chapter 27 to assess the five (5) property owners
_..,; have not voluntarily dedicated for the cost of their frontage
improvements.
B11CK910UN0/ANALYSIS:
AC the present time, 82% of the property owners on Arrow Route within
the protect limits have signed 0.greements for Installation of Public
improvements and Dedication and Easement Deed documents. The frontage
improvements to be provided are curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drivn_
approaches, street trees, street lights and parking cane pavements
For those property owners who have not yet dedicated, of which there are
five (5) out of twenty-eight, an Eminent Oamatn action is to be taken to
acquire the property needed to widen Arrow Route to its ultimate width
within the pro,iect limits. At this time, staff requests Dermission to
obtain cuotes from two consulting aporaisers for the appraisal of each
of the five following properties:
~ 1) APN 207_201-20 (6618 Arrow Route)
2) APN 207-262-39 (8563 Arrow Route)
3) APN 207-201-03 (8548 Arrow Route}
4) APN 207-261-91 (8529 Arrow Route)
r~ 5) APN 207-591-29 (8488 Arrow Route)
~y
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: ARROM ROUTE APPMISALS
May 20, 1987
Page 2
•
The first four properLtes arc along Arr011 Route b.:: the Cucaeonga
Greek CMnnel and Baker Avenue. IL is lnten!~4 acquire the roadway
eassent frog these parcels through Esftwx ~..irain, construct the street
and parkray tproveaamts aM ass~~a ~'R affected properties for these
iprovsents Dy use of the ttm;Y•r 27 Provlslon of tIM Iprovsent Act
of 1911. For the f#».r. property (APR 207-591-29), lotattd at the
northwest corner ~:! krror Route and Baker Avenue, it is intended to take
a epdifis? .iorner cut-off by conduanatton W construct a rub return
oni, which wlll allow for the eopletlon of the intersection
iprov~ants.
It 1s also requested that C1p~ Council authorise and direct the City
Attorney W proceed with Erinant pegin proceedings tar the f1w before
eentlaned properties. It is furtMr requested that Cigr Council direct
staff to proceed with the assessnnt of the cost of the frontage
iprorsents to be constructed wAtch shell not exceed the appraised
value of the land. A short fore action of Chapter 27 'Construetian of
Sidewalks and Curb Provisions' of the Iproweent Act of 1911 w111 he
used to assess the affected properties for tM proposed frontage
iproveaents.
Resp~e~cf~yily suhedtted, •
RIM~EU:ko.~
ys
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
RECa~E11aATta:
..lp ~~ "~'k:
~'
V t
Flt U Z
-„ >
19"~
The required street Tnprovements for tract 12739 have been completed in
an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said
520,~900.OOtsauthorlpze the City Engineerutoanile aoNOtlce of Compt ti on
and authorize the Cttyy Clerk to release the Faithful Perfonmance Bond in
the amount of (209,000.00.
Background/Analysis
Tract 12739 - located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Center
Avenue.
DEVEL~ER: Deer Creek Partners
tab west Main Street
Tustin, CA 92680
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 520,900.00
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5209,000.00
Respe~tf y submitted,
(//'/ ~
R w
y6
• RESaurIDN no. S ~ ~~53
A RESaUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUGMONGA, GLIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 12739 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING Of A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE IgRK
NHEREAS, the construction of public improvesients for Tract 12749 have
been crnryleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Notice of Ccwlpletion is required to be filed, certifying
the work cooplete.
N011, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the Cfty Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Cahpletion with
the County Recorder a/ San Bernardino County.
•
y~
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
RECOMIEN01TI011:
~,,~c,~,uo,~
u
p
;~
F Z
r. >
19"
The required street improvements for Tract 9619 have been completed in an
acceptable manner and St is recommended that City Council accept said
improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of
581,350.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in
the amount of f813,500.00.
Background/Analysis
Track 9619 - located on the northwest corner of Carnelian Street and
Jasper Street
DEVELOPER: Plasa MN tAnne
3187A Airway
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) (81,350
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) =813,500
Respec ily submitted,
f
L
RHM:CB:~h
Attachments
y~
RESOLUTION N0. $ 7 " a'S7
•
A RESOLUTIQI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IIpROYEMENTS
FOR TRACT %19 AHD AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION fOR THE IA)RK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract %19 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Campletlon is required to 6e filed, certifying
the work complete.
NUM, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Compietion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
•
~9
•
GATE: May Z0, 1987
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
T0: ayor and Mesbers of the City Council
FROM• Brad Buller, City Planner
8Y: Richard Alcorn, Conwunity Code Representative
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CASN DEPOSIT
RECOIMENOATiON: Mork for the folloring tracts has been caaryleted and
t e tas epos is in the total aapunt of (4,500 aro hereby recoaaunded
by the Planning Division to De released to the Oeer Creek Caapany:
(SUbdivlsion)
9269 1 (2,600 22364 Sates Office
(Model Noses)
9269 N/A 51.000 917a5 ? c~~..
(Subd7viston)
BB:RA:,)r
SD
- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA ~~;~
STAFF REPORT ~~'
U
1977
DATE: May 20, 1987
TO: City Council and City Manager
PROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager
BY: Jerry B. Pulwood, Aaaeeement Revenue CoordSnator
SUBJECT: Approval of a 3 Year Preferred Service Apreeunt
HatwNm The City o! Rancho Cucamonma and PriN
Computer Inc Par Monthly Service Maimtm
Tota111np Apnroximataly 830 960 00 Over th! LSle
of Lhe llareement.
RECO!@tEDATION:
. It 1• recommended that City Council approve the attached
Service Agreement, giving approval !or this addandua to the
Service Agreement already Sn existence.
BACKGROUND/ANALYS IS•
The current agreement between the City o! Rancho Cucamonga
and Prime Computer, Inc. Se scheduled to terminate on June
30, 1987. This new agreement would be a cantinuation until
December 31, 1989, thereby locking the City into the current
rate that Se being paid now and Snsuring no Sncrease in
coats for !ha current system. Should the City upgrade and
add on to the eyatem the monthly maintenance charge would De
added on to this addendum and the Preferred service pricea
would be given to the City, The savSngs to the City would
be eonalderable as Prise Computer, Inc. increases its pricea
annually. The City Attorney hse reviewed this contract and
has apprcved it ae to Corm.
Res ctiul ley//SQubmitted,
~!
RAR:JBB:kmm
5/
kgSOLUTION N0. 87-r~'v
A SESOLOTION OP THB CzTY COUNCIL OP 1NE CITL OP RANCHO
WCAMDNu-, CALIFORWLt, AUTNORZZING T36 DHSTRUCTION OP CIT!
RECORDS ANO DOiUNSftt3 WHI(8 Agg ND LONGER RHQUIRHD AS PPO-
VID® UNDE0. GOVERIDOII7T CODB SHCTION 34090
WNBItBAS, it 6u bean determined that certain City swords under tba
charge of the tolloring City Dapartaent are no longer required for public or
pcivare purpour.
Eogineariag Departawt/Transportation Division; ud
Cesaunity Services Dapartant
WHBRBAS, it hu bean dateaiaad that dutmetios of the
above-aaationed satarials is oaeuury to consasva storage apace, u rWaca
staff rise. apaasa, sad eoetuioe in handling, sod infotfiag the pnblic; Bred
WEEREAS, Section 34090 of the Ceretsaat Code of the Stare of Califor-
nia wthorisu the bead of a City departawt to dutmy soy City records sad
doeveau rhich era over tro yore old under bis or her eharp, rithout Baking
a copy therwf, attar the Belo era u lossges required, npon the approval of the
City Council by ruolntios and the rrietu coaaeut of the City Attorney; and
• IiNBREA3, it is therefore duireble to dntroy uid swords a lisred
in 8s6ibit "A" attached hereto and ode a part herwf, in storage, riehout eak-
ing • copy therwf, rhich are over tro yore olds ud
WIIERBAS, uid swards Nava Deere worovad for denmetien h. .;.. rt •.
Attorney. '
NON. TNHREPORE, TNB CIT! COUNCIL OP TSE CITP OP RANCgO CUCAMDNGA D06S
RHSOLVE A6 FOLLOWS:
S>ION-1: That approval sad authoriaatiou is hereby giro to duttoq
thou records dneribed a ~:hibic "A" attached hereto sad ode • part 6erwf.
SHLTIO&~2s That tG City Clerk is authorized to a11or ustinatioo bq
end doution to the Daparteent of Special Collections of the University Re-
search Libraq, University of Cslifomia, or other historical society designat-
ed bq the City Council, soy of the records ducribed iu B,chibit "A" attached
hereto and Bade a part herwf, except thou dared to 6e coofidwtial.
5eLTiOW 3; Thet the City Clerk ehn11 certify to the adoption of thin
cool utioa. ud ehwcefort6 ud thereaftn the sae shall be in full force sad
effect.
1
S~
Resolution No. 87-+++
Page 3
HalIBIT eA" •
COilONIT4 SER9ICES DSPAATMBMT
1967-1978 PrrBudget Working P~psn
1968-1977 Comry Andit Rapozta
1974-1977 Bank 9taceaeata
1976-1978 Miecdlaneoua Cotrupoedance
1976 CBA 50 Pnopoaala for Pask Devalop~nt
1977 Coonty Porckuieg Regsiiaitiow
1978 Rdflic Votb Grant Corraapondence
1977-1979 Pgioll, caaeallad checks and rarrwu
1972-1983 Racseetion Pmgr~ geceipu
1976-1900 Chromlogical Corrupoadaxe lilac •
1978-1982 Msoa and Cosrupoadanca
1982-1984 PrrOudget Working Papers
1982-1983 Recreation Mail-in Registration Pore
1982-1983 Waivers for:
Nen'• o-Laague, Aaerican Leagw, National Laagua, Msn'a C-League. Men's
8-League, Co-Bd Pridq. Co-ed National, !Mn'e A-B League. CrBd Aaarican,
Buketbail Leagw
1982-1983 Recrutioo Progr~a and Events
1983 Medical Ralaua Pore
1983-1984 Grapevine tiles
ENGINEERING DBPAATMENT/1TAN8PORTATION DI91SION
1980 9aa Bernardino County Traltic Cootsol Dericee Inventory
r1
U
53
RECORDS INVENTORY WORRSHEET
• DEPARTNENT ENGINEERING FILE CAB. N0.
LOCATION TRANSPORTATION DIVISION S}IELF CASE NO.
PACe No. oTRER
PREPARED BY/DATE VOLUNE (CU.FT.)
INCLUSIVE DATES
DRAWER N0.
SAELF N0.
SERIES TITLE(S) 6 DESCRIPTIOI/ OP COiRERT3
1980 San Bernardino County Traffic Control
Devices Inventory
FOR DESTRUCTION BT
x~
O~~ /J ~v~
DISPOSITION OP AHCOROS:
S~
RHSOLUTION N0. 87-M~
C~
A RBSOLUTION OB THH CITY ODONCIL OP Tf1S CITY OP RANWO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING 1tiH DBSTRUCTION OP CZTY
RHCORDS AND DOCOiBNT3 WIlICN ARH NO LONGHR RHQUIRHD AS PRo-
VIDHD UNDHH GOVERNMRiT CODS SHCTZON 34090
WHHRY6S, it hu been detaainad that certain City records order the
charge of the folloriag City Dapazt•aat era no lovgar rsquirad fos public or
private purposes:
Hnginaezing Depertaent/Transportation Divitiov; and
Coouniry Services Dapartaant
WNBRHAS, it 6u bean daiarfinad that dutruction of the
above-untiowd ytarials is wcuury to coosarra storage spaN, w reduce
staff Lisa, arpaau. ud confwion is handling, and intoning the public; and
WNHRHAB, Section 34090 of the Governpnt CoM o! the Sete of Califon
nia authorises the 6aad o! a City departaent eo destmy say City records and
docu•uta rhic6 era aver vo yen old usdes hie or her eharge. rithout eking
^ copy thereof, after the ssN are no Loagar ragaisad, upon eha approval of the
City Comcil by rroluiion and the rrittu cowant of eha City Attoraq; and
• WNERHAS. it is Lhanfora duirabL to dntroy uid records as Listed
in B:hibit ^A^ attached haraeo and wade a part hereof. is storage, vithaui mak-
ing a copq thereof, rhich era over tro ynn old; ud
WNHRF.LS, uid rwords have bau approved for dntruction by the Citv
Attorneq.
NOW, TNHRHFORH, THH CITY CWNCIL OP TNB CITY OB RANCNO CUGlpNGA DOHS
RESOLVH AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That approval sad authorization is hereby given to destroy
these records ducribed a Bshibit ^A" attached hereto ud uda • part hereoF.
SHCTION 2: That [he Citq Glerk is auCharized to alloy ezuiwtion by
end donation to the Dapartaent of Spacial Cgllactions of the University Re-
search Library, University of California, or other historical society designat-
ed by the City Cowcil. anp of the records ducribed in ®:hibit "A" attached
hereto and wda • part hereof, szcapt those deaed to be coafidaaeial.
SSCf20N 3: That eha City Clerk shell certify to the adoption of this
resolution, and theacaforth snd thanaf ur the sue shall be in full forty end
effect. r\~' I~
I I
55
Resolution No. 87-oaf
Page 3
BSBIBIT "A"
COMMBnITY sBA9ICBS ngpAATMBlrr
1967-1978 PrrBudget Working Ptpaze
1968-1977 County Audit Aeporta
1974-1977 Bank Stat~wp
197(x1978 Miacallanaow Corrupondanca
1976 CSA 50 Proposals for park Da"elop~ant
1977 CountF Pnrebuing Regniaitione
1978 Public Works Groat Corraapoadenca
1977-1979 Pgroil, caacalled chocks and rarraata
1972-1985 Aacraatioa Prngr~ Wacaipu
1976-1980 Chzonological CorrNpondence Pilo •
1978-1932 lima and Cosrnpoadaxe
1982-1984 PrrBudgat Working Papaya
1982-1985 Racraatioa Mail-is Ragiatration Fozaa
1982-1985 Weivara for:
Maa'• C-Leagw, Narican Lugw, Matioo.l Laagua. Maa'^ C-Leagw, lLa's
B-Laagua, Co-Hd Prida9. Crad National, Men'• A-B Laagw, Co-8d Marican,
Baakatbell Lugw
1932-3985 Aacrution Pmgrau and Bunts
1983 Medical Ralaua Pone
1933-1934 Gnpeviae Pilo
BNGIN~IING DHPAATMB'NT/TRANSPORTATION D14ISI03
1980 Sao Baraardino Cowt7 Traffic Control Davicaa 2nvaneory
•
56
RECORDS INVENtORY WORKSHEET
• DEPAATI¢NT FILE CAB. N0.
LOCATION SHELF CASE NO.
PAGE N0. OTgEg
PREPARED BY/DATE VOL(D¢ (CD, gT 1
INCLUSIVE DATES
SERIES TITLE(S) 6 DESCRIPTION OT CIR7TEN'TS REMAKES;
CCMNNITY SERViCFS DEPARTMENT
DRAIR?II N0.
SHELF N0.
1967-1978 Pre-Budget ibrki~ papers 1982-1985 Naivers far: Men's C-League,
7968-1977 Gaunt Audit Mierican League, Nsttonal League, Men's
Y Reports C League, Men s B-League, Co-Ed Friday,
Co-ed National, Men's A-8 League, Co-Ed
7974-7977 Bank statements American, Basketball League
1976-1978 Miscellaneous Correspondence 1982-1985 Recreation Programs A Events
7976 CSA 50 Proposals for Park Develapma~t 1YOJ ''1eu icai Release horns
1983-1984 Grapevine F11es
1977 County Purchasing ReQuisitions
1978 Public Norks Crest Correspondence
1977-1979 Payroll, cancelled checks and Warrants
1972-7985 Recreation Program Receipts
1976-7980 Chronological Correspondence Files
1978-7982 Memos and Correspondence
1982-1484 Pre-Budget Norking Papers
1982-1985 Recreation Mail-in Registration Fotms
APPROV D FOR DESTRIN;TIDN BY
lip / CIIY ATTO d
DISPOSITION OP RECORDS:
vim'.
r~ ~-~y~
M/ _ i
57
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: May 20, 1987
T0: yor and Mea~bers of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
8Y: Greg Gage, Assistant Planner
GlG.NO
.~' -r
t
f i
1917
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSiENT AND VARIANCE 86-OB (MENDED)
~rclnnncc - n regwsc to wive tie aax caw g
req~re~e~ of 35 feet for an exkndable radio anknna to
allow an existing antenna to be exknded to 72 feet on a
.47 acre parcel in the Very Low Residential District (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre) located at 5327 Carol
Avenue - APN 1061-111-19.
I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the hearing on the appeal
e se or une 3, 1987.
[I. BACKGROUND: AS a result of Code Enforcement, the applicant had
or g na y sought approval of a Variance to allow the continwd use
of an exlsN ng fazed radio antenna tower, and Lo perNt exknsi on
of the support structure from 50 to 70 feet in height. At Its
meeting on Janwry 28, 1987, the Planning Commission denied the
proposal on the grounds that there ws insufficient justification
for the request. The applicant subsequently appealed. [n filing
the appeal, the applicant proposed to amend the in1 t1a1 rcquesL
bY: (I) Drdvt diva a retraatahlo Awct nn fnr rh. ,n...,.. , ,_...
structure; (2) increasing the maximum overall height (exknded) to
72 feet; and (3) keeping the antenna and support structure
retracted to less than 35 feet when not in use. The anknna would
be extended for use on weeknights and weekends.
Since the Planning Coa~lssion had not reviewed the amended request,
the City Council lacked jurisdiction prerequisites to act on the
request as amended. Accordingly, the amended request ws referred
by the Council back to the Planniny CoAaisston for their review and
consideration.
At its meeting on March 25, 1987, the Planning Cowsisston continued
the item to its April 8, 1981 meeting ai the request of the City
Attorney. The continuance was requested to allow the City Attorney
to review a new case law relakd to the application. At its
meeting on April 8, 1987, the Planning Cowission denied the
amended request on the basis that: (11 the facts relatiny to the
subject property had not changed since the Ccanlsslon's initial
review in January; and (2) mere ws no hardship applicable to the
subject property which ws not equally applicrtile to other
properties in the same zoning district. The applicant is appealing
the dental of the amended request.
S 0
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: May 20, 1987
T0: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director
BY: Olen Jones, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: SET JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCRMONGA FOR 7:00 P.M. ON JUNE 17, 1987, WITH RESPECT TO
THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AMENDMENT N0. 1 ANO THE SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT PREPARED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the setting of a Joint Public Nearing with the City
ounc o t e City of Rancho Cucamonga for 7:00 p.m. on June 17, 1987, with
respect to the RedevelopmH•nt Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project
Amendment No. 1 and the Supplement to the Environmental Impact Report prepared
in connection therewith.
BACKGROUND: At the Redevelopment Agency meeting on March 4, 1987, the
amendment process began by the adoption of the Preliminary Report. Since
then, the Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Reprot have been
prepared and circulated as required.
ANALYSIS: Community Redevelopment Law requires that public hearings of the
Ro~ovnin omen! On nA ne Me r!~ • r^ ^il .~,• !;^ld •~_ _ _d.
Redevelopment Planna nd the Supplement to~they Environmental Impact Report prior
to the adoption of the amended Redevelopment Plan. As an alternative
procedure, the Agency and the Council may hold a joint public hearing where
both entities are Convened at the same time with the Mayor presiding.
Following approval of setting the joint public hearing for June 17, 1987,
notices of the hearing will be prepared and published in a local newspaper for
three successive weeks prior to the hearing. Additionally, Agency staff will
begin preparing notices which are to be mailed on June 1, 1987 to all property
owners and affected taxing agencies within the Project Area.
R~ectfull subm
Jack 1(L/M1/a'.m0~~,1C~n/AI.I CP
Community Development Director
JL :OJ :kap
s~
ORDINANCE N0. 313
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADD[N6 SECTION 12.04.010 (P) TO CHAP-
TER 12.04 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINtN6
TO THE PROHIBITION OF SWIMMING AND DIVING WITHIN ANY POND,
R EFLECTIHO POOL, ETC., OF A CITY PARK OR OTHER RECREATION
FACILITY
A. Recitals.
(i) Section 12.04.010 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code contains
those regulations concerning prohibited activities within any park or other
recreation facility owned or operated by the City.
(11) At present, certain City parks and recreational fac 111 ties have
been developed including water features such as ponds, reflecting pools, etc.
More specifically, Red Hill Park is presently developed with a shallow pond.
This, and other similar water features, have been designed and developed to
provide a pleasing aesthetic environment in such City parks and recreational
facilities and have not been designed to accommodate swimming and diving.
(iii) At Dresent, said Section, 12.04.010 does not prohibit the use
• of such water features for rec reatlonal activities such as swimmf ng and
diving. Due to the fart that many children are presently on vacation, and in
view of the current warm weather, a number of children may 6e induced to uti-
lize the existing pond within Red Hill Park, and other similar water features,
for swimming and diving. Accordingly, this Council feels that it is immediate-
iV nov o<ca rY h_n_ aA_n_nf_ nunnl,lln n._ nwnF:F: N.... >1. u , ., a _. ..
- ~ ~.~y ~.i~.. i ~..~ •.u vlV11Y Yac V I (IV IIU> p11Y
water features within City parks and recreational facilities.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adopii on of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B, Ordinance.
NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordained 6y the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Park A, of
this Ordinance.
Section 2. The Gity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
firds as follows:
a. Certain parks and recreational facilities within the Cfty of
Rancho Cucamonga have Deen developed with the aesthetic features of ponds, re-
flecting pools and waterscape features. Such ponds, etc., have not been de-
signed ar developed to accommodate recreational ac tf viti es s••ch as swtnming,
diving, wading, etc.;
Nc
Page 2
b. At present, various schools are on vacation and the region is •
experiencing unusually worn weather. Due to these facts, a number of children
are likely to be in City parks and induced to utilize such ponds and water
features in a Wanner for which they have not been designed; and,
c. The unregulated utilization of such ponds and water features
without appropriate regulation to insure the safe use thereof would result in
an immediate threat to the public health, safety or welfare of those persons
utilizing such Lity parks and recreational facilities.
Section 3. Section 12.04.010 (P] is hereby added to Chapter 12.04 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cdde, to be read, in words and figures, as fol-
lows:
"P. Swim, dire, wade or in any way enter into any pond, lake,
water feature, reflecting pool or any similar body of water.'
Section 4. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once~in The Oail Re rt, a newspaper of general circulaLlon published
in the City of Ontar o, ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, Glifornia.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this • day of •, I9•.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, Lity Clerk
•
•
•
May 28, 1987
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official ~y~j
SUBJECT: UPDATE OP BUILDING REGULATIONS C
~~u.eloyc
f~ ~ ~~
~'-
,r
o
F U PZ
U >
1971
I. REOpl11ffiiDATION: It to recommended that the City Council
con ucd t a publTa hearing and, at its conclus[on, hold final
first reading for ndoption of the accompsnying or dinsnce.
II. BNCKGROUND: State taw provides for adoption of building
regul~ona by local agencies and sets specific procedures
for adoption of codes by reference ea is proposed in this
case.
Furthermore, the Health and Safety Code specifies that
certain nationally recognlaed codes be ndopted for
..........: ..r .:.t....:.t t...:tnt..... .. r.t: r,....t. nn
limits ~modificetion of their technicel•provisions. TAe law,
however does not limit modification of adtntnistrative
provisions nor restrict eddi Lionel regulations not included
in those standards.
The latest city adoption of building regulations took place
in 1981 which have been in effect since then.
In the meantime, state statutory requirements have changed so
that Local modifications are now restricted to those that can
be related to the topography, geology or climate of the local
area. This latest revision dictates that certain prior
inclusions in our reguletiona be dropped because they cannot
be logically related to either of the governing [actors. :1s
a result, we have lass several features (particularly in the
electrical code) which served to provide greater convenience
end flexibility for Rancho Cucamonga homeowners at little
additional cost.
lP
Staff Report: UPDATE OP BUILDING REGULATIONS
May 20, 1987
Page 2
We sre proposing to continue those prior code modifications •
that can in some way be related to geology, topography or
climate. It is staff opinion that our climatic cond[tiona
ere highly conduelve to the use of outdoor and eceeasorq
areas for recreational and/or hobby uses. Therefore, several
emendmenta regarding wiring in garages and minimua cspaeitiea
of electrical panels and conduit sizes end n requirement for
spare electrical raceways have been included to allow for
future expansion and/or use o[ outdoor/accessory areas
without wholesale destruction of building components.
We are also continuing our current fire retardant rooting
requirements, Oased upon climatic cireumatances, and likewise
our local revia-ons relating to grading whi cn we consider to
De either topographically or geolog[eslly related.
A reaolutlon of ezpress finding of neeesaity for theca local
modifications will ba brought before the City Counall et the
time of second reading of tna otdinanee es is raqulred Dy
state law.
In addition to llama continued or genersted tram previous
adoptions, we ar• introducing several changes, not previously
included, as follows: .
s). We have proposed adoption of the Uniform
Administrative Code in lieu of separate
administrative provisions [n each of the model
codes. This will remove subtle eontlicte in
y,~3euii:v- "-.. C~.Y:~.:' •A. inAl viAn.l
documents and will provide un[formity in spplicetion.
:). TRc !ie!g^.t et r!hich buildi:!e permits ere1~ be
required for masonry wails and fences has been
chsnged from 8 ft. to 3 ft. We have not included
other fences in this some permit category because
masonry fences generally represent a greater
investment by the property owner and because of their
relatively greater weight, represent a higher degree
of hazard In the event they were to tall.
c). Rooting design criteria has been modified to allow
the development of policy for supplementary fastening
of roofing materials in our unusual wind areas.
{Current code provisions do not provide
administrative authority in this regard)
•
(3
Statt Report: UPDATE OP SIJI I1D [NG REGULAT[ON9
May 29, 1987
Page 3
•
Aalde from a number of minor technical changes in the
parent documents and the above outlined Sasuea, the
ordinance before the City Council represent subatentially
e continuation of regulations currently in effect.
Adoption of this ordnance will provide Rancho Cucamonga
with the latest avaflaDle Dullding regulations in all
construction disciplines.
JG:11
•
u
G~
• GiiDINANve rD.. ~ ~ r
AN ORDINANCE OF TH6 CITY GUilCIL OP THE CITY OP RANaD
ClICMIIt"A, RFFFN.ItG CiHPI$i8 13.04, 13.08, 15. t2,
13.18, 15.20, 15.24 AND 13.28 OP TITLE 15, BJIIDIN®
Aro COVS1ALTiQi, OP Tlti RAt>~D MNICIPAI,
GO1E IN THEIR FNfIREIY, AND 3lLR'IQB 2, 3, 4, 7, 9,
AND 10 OP T1E SAN BHl4Al0)I14) ~Iy ~E AII1PIfD BY
ORUIINtILE 17; AND AOtAPtNG BY itEFEH@[B THE "127IPf1iH
ADl'-NISIRKI'fVE CiIE", 1985 ®17[0:1; 1t$ UNIPIA4
BU(IDINfi OI6, 1985 Sl[TIQ4 R'R.11DDR1 ALL APPENDICBB
THUD: TH6 "QiIPiAt H7IIDItO OZE ", 1985
®ITIO9; T1E "II4IPO8M 583191t1(CAL OBE", 1983 EDITIQi,
INadDDC ALL APPEBDN~ THEIBIO; THE "IDHPOBH
PLibBllp d~", 1985 BDITIQ)i tlp,IDI1C ALL APP@8)ICE89;
THB NATIONAL EL~IRICAL Off, 1987 EDITIOY; THB
"iMPOEM O~ RR TA6 AE809i@iC Op >
BUIIDD[[~", 1983 ®ITION; TH6 "RIIPOBM HQHDp Off",
1983 ®ITIQi; TH6 "1I71tW1 BUItDR07 9B7RITY C{Z6",
1885 DITtON; iv[TH CEATADI Al@lts$iIB, ADDITIO)B,
DHEYIOHS AND E8[ST'1'1'IONB W BAJD O]l~, INQ,iDIN3
PENALTiD
A. RBCITALB
• (i) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 0[ Title S of
the California Govermient Code authorf aas tAe adoption, by reference of the
Uniform Adninlstrstiva Code, 1885 Edition; the Uniform Building Code, 1985
Edition; the Unffo~m Building Coda Standards, 1885 P4ition; tAe Vntfortn
MecAani eel nnA. ions nwttie :. .
Edition ineiudin all a ~ ~ V11 °`O1 r+umo~ng uoae, 1985
6 ppendlcea; tAe National Eleatr[cel Code,
1987 Edition; the Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings, 1985 Edition; the Uniform Housing Code, 1985 Edition;
the Uniform Building 9eoueity Coda, 1985 Edition; and tAe Uniform
Sign Code, 1985 Edition, eaoh as published by fAe internatTOnal
Conference of Building Officials end (or) the Internetionel
Association of Plumbing end Mechsnicnl Officials or the National
Fire Protection Association.
(ii) At least one copy of eacA at said Codes end
Standards certified es full, true and correct copies tAereo[ by
the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga have been flied in
the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in
accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section
50022.6.
(iii) A duly noticed public hearing, as required by
California Government Cod• Section 50022.3, hss been conducted
and concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
(Iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this
ordinance hove occurred.
W
B• ORDINANCE.
CucamongaNdoes 6e~r eby R(i nd ,h d termineuandlorda nh es LollowsRencho
SECTION 1. In all respects as set forth in the
Recitals, part A, of thin Ordinance.
SECTION 2. Title 13 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal odd e, entitled Buildtnaa •nd Construction, and CAepters
2, 3, 4, 7, 0, and 10 of the Ban arnar :no County Code adopted
by Ordinance No. 17 of the City Council of the Clty of Rancho
Cucamonga sre hereby repealed, provided that said repeal shall
not apply to or exauae any violation thereof occurring prior to
the effective date of this Ordinance and provide further that the
Uniform Codes as adopted by reference end amended by Ordinenaea
Nos. 17, S9, and 122 of thta Citq shalt continua to be appltaaDle
to conatructlon for which plans Aava Deea submitted for plan
check end the plan cheek tees paid as of the stteetiv date of
this ordinance, proridad that the permit/s therefor are lasued no
longer than ninety (80) days after the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Section 3. A new Title 15 is AereDy added to the
Mneho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words end figures, as •
follows:
"Title 13
nUILDINC9 AND CONSTRUCTION
Chanters:
13.04 Codes Adoption
13.08 AAniniatrative Code
13.12 Building Code
13.38 Mechanical Coda
13.20 Plumbing Code
13.24 6leatricnl Code
13.28 Code for Abatement of
Dangerous Buildings
13.32 Housing Coda
13.38 Sign Code
15.40 Building Security Code
SECTION 4. A new Chapter 15.04 is hereby ndded to
the Rancho l,u~aamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and
figures, es follows:
'P Y°
r1
LJ
•
Chapter 15.04
Codes Adoption
Secttons•
15.04.010 Codes Adoption
15.04.010 Codes Ado lion. The "Uniform Administrative
Code^, 198 Edition; t e "Uni orm Building Code", 1985 Edition,
including" ell appendices thereto; the "Uniform Building Codes
Standards , 1985 Edition; the "Uniform Mechanical Code", 1985
Edition including all appendicea thereto; the "Uniform Plumbing
Code^, 1985 Bdition, including nil appendices thereto; the
"National Electrical Code^, 1984 Edition; the "Uniform Code for
the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings^, 1985 Edition; the "Uniform
Housing Code", 1885 Edition; the "Uniform Building Security
Code:, 1985 Edition; and the "Uniform Sign Code", 1985 Edition;
are hereby adopted in their entirety as the Building end
Construction Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
together with the amendments, sdditiona, deletions end exceptions
set forth in Chsptera 15.08 thru 15.40 below.
SECfICN 5: A new Chapter 15.08 is Aerebq added to
the Rancho ucsmonga Municipal Code, to reed in words and
figures, as follows:
Chapter 15.08
Administrative Code
Sections:
15.08.010 Section 202(e) Amended--General
15.08.020 Section 202(c) Amended--Right
of Entry
(5.08.030 Section 204 Amended--Appeals
15.08.040 Section 205 Amended--Violations and
Penalties
15.08.050 Section 301(b) Amended--Exempted Work
15.08.080 Section 392(e) Information on Plans
and Specificati ons
15.08.070 Section 303(a) Amended--Issuance
15.08.080 Section 303(d) Amended--Expiration
15.09.040 Section 363(1) Added--Unfinished
Buildings
15.08.100 Section 304(a) Amended--Pees
15.08.110 Section 305(h) Amended--Reinapections
15.08.120 9eatlon 307(n) Nnended--Energy
Connecti ons
15.08.010 Amended--General. Section 202(a) of said •
Uniform A intstret:ve Code s emended to reed es follows:
Section 202(a). General. The Building Official shall
enforce the provisions of this Title, the Uniform
Administrative Code, 1985 Edition and the technical
codes referenced therein and shell have the
responsibility for making interpretations thereof, for
deciding upon the approval of equipmkent end materials
end for granting special permission provided for in a
number of code seeti one therein.
15.080.020 Section 202(a) Amended--Ri ht of Entr .
9eation 2 c o an:d Vn orm Admtntstret ve Coe Is hereby
amended to reed es tollowe:
9eation 202(c) Right of Entry. The Building Official,
or his duly euthoeiaed representative, shall hsve the
authority to enter any building or pr anises for the
purpose of inveat[gsting the existence of suspected or
reported damage or detects which constitute an immediate
danger to human life or an immediate hazard to public
aatety or health. Except in emergency situations, the
Building Ottic[el, or his suthoeizad representative,
shall not enter any occupied Duitdfng or premises
without the consent of the owner of occupant thereof, .
unless he possesses s warrant authorizing entry end
search of the premises. No person shall hinder of
prevent the Building Ofticinl, or his authorized
representative, while in the pertormsnae of the duties
herein descri Ded as emeraenav sitnatinn. _ •-;;;• -
possess:on o[ a warrant, tram ~enteri ng upon end into any
and all premises under his jurisdiction, st ell
reasonable hours, for the purpose of inspecting the same
to determine whether or not the provisions of this code,
the referenced technical codes end all other applicable
laws or ordinances pertaining to the protection of
persons or property are observed therein.
15.08.030 Seatlon 204 Amended--A eels. Section 204
of said Unt orm Administrative Code, is hereby emended to reed es
follows:
Seaton 204(e) Appeals. A decision of the Building
Official regarding interpretstion or implementation o[
any provision of this Title, the Uniform Administrative
Code, 1985 Edition, or the technical codes referenced
therein shell be final and shell become etteative
forthwith upon the service of the decision of the
Building Official, in writing, upon the permittee,
applicant oe other person effected by the decision,
hereafter celled permittee. Por purposes of this
section, service upon the permittee shell mean either
personal delivery or placement in the United States
Msii, postage prepaid, and addressed to the permittee et
his lest known business pddpreasl provided, however, that
t/O O
the permittee may, within tan (t0) days after the
• effective date of service of the decision of the
Building Official, file en appeal with the City Clerk,
in writing, specifying the reason or reasons for [he
appeal end requesting that the Board o[ Appeals review
the decision o[ the Building Official.
(b) Board of Appeals. The City Council or such Other
five (S) persons, other than employees of the City, that
the City Council may appoint, shall act as a Board of
Appeals in making n final determination of any appeal
filed in accordance with the provisions of Subsection
(a) of this Section. The City Clerk shall schedule a
hearing on the appeal nt ressoneDle times and et the
convenience of the Board of Appeals, Dut not later then
thirty (JO) days after receipt of the written appeal.
The permittee may appear in person before the Board or
be represented by an nttor nay and may Introduce evidence
!o support his claim. The Building Otf icisl shall
transmit to the Board all records, papers, documents and
other materials in support of his deeiaion end shell
provide n copy thereof to the permittee appealing the
decision of the Building Official. The permittee
appealing the decision of the Building Ottietel shall
cause, at his own expense, any testa or research
required by the Board to subatentiete Ais claim to be
performed or otherwise carried out. The Board may
continue such appeal hawing from time to time as defined
necessary by the Board. The Board may, by resolut[on,
affirm, reverse, or modify in whole or in pert, any
appealed decision, determination or interpretation of
the Buildin¢ Otti alai. s onny ~! !!;: ,.. m-, evupiau
i
by the Board shall be mailed to the parmi t
t ee end the
Board's decision shall be final upon the mailing, by
United States Mnil, postage prepaid, to the permittee's
teat known address of record.
Notw[thetanding the foregoing, appeals tiled in relation
to substandard rest dentinl buildings shell be processed
in accordance with Section 203 of the Uniform Housing
Code.
iv. uo.v+u oacc,on cvu mrcnueu--~ w:ai:una nua
Penalties. act on o se: Un: orm Administrative ode is
hereby emended to read as follows:
Section 205 yfolations and Penalties. /t shall ba
unlawful [or any person, firm, or corporation to erect,
construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve,
eonveet or demol[sh, equip, use, occupy, or maintain any
building or strueture in the Ci4y, or install or alter
any electrieel, plumbing, mechanical work d ne,or cause
x~ the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any
of the provis[ona of this Title.
G~
My person, firm, or corporation violating any of the
provistona of tAis Title shall be demted guilty of e •
sepsrate offense for each and every day or portion
thereof during which any violation of any of the
provisions of this Code is committed, continued, or
permitted, and upon conviction of any such violation
such person shall be punishable 6y a fine of not more
then One Thousand Dollars (51,000), or by Imprisonment
for not more than six months, or by both such fine and
imprisonment.
$eCtiOn J 1 ~~`° rn,enua a--6x Led
1 o ae Un orm A nIstrat ve Coe is
amended to rend as follows:
Section RO1(b) 1. Building Peemits. A building permit
shell not be required for the following:
A. One story detached accessory Duildinga used as tool
sad storage sheds, playhouses, and similar ones,
provided the projeoted root Brea does not exeead
iR0 aquas feet.
B. Wood, chainlink, plastic metal or similar 1[ght
weight feneea not over 8 feet in height above the
lowest sdJacent grade.
C. Oil derricks. •
D. Movable cases, counters and partitions not over 5
feet high.
E. Retaining wells end masonry fences which are not
over 3 feet in height above the lowest adjacent
grade, unless supporting a surcharge loud or
intended for impounding flammable liquids.
P. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the
capaoity does not exceed 5000 gallons and the ratio
of height to diameter or width does not exceed two
to one.
G. Platforms, walks end driveways not more than 90
inches above grade and not over any basement or
story Detow.
H. Painting, papering end aimiler finish work.
i. Temporary motion picture, television end theater
stage seta end scenery.
J. Window awnings supported by an ea erior well of •
Croup R, D[viaton 9, end Oroup M Ooeupanciea when
pro)ecting not more than 54 inches from the
supporting wall.
70
K. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group
• R, Division 3 Occupancy in which the pool wells ere
entirely above the adjacent grade and it the
capacity does not exceed 5000 gallons.
L. The changing or the advertising copy or message on
a painted or printed sign.
N. Painting, repainting or cleaning of an advertising
structure provided no structural changes ere made.
N. Signs less than 8 feet above grade that are not
electrically lighted.
O. Changing of theater marquees and similar signs
specifically designed for the use of changeable
copy.
Unless otherwise exempted by this ends, separate plumbing,
electrical end mechan[cal parmita will De required for the
above exempted items.
~e~ivna. oeci[on nu't tcl o[ the Uniform Admin[strative
ode is hereby emended to read ea follows:
Section 302 (ej. Information on plans and specifications.
Plans and specifications shell be drawn to scale upon
substnntiel paper or cloth snd shall be of sufficient clarity
to indicate the locution, nature and extent of the work
proposed end show in detail that it will conform to rho
provisions o[ ins technical codes end ell relevant laws,
ordinances, rules end regulations.
Plans for buildings more then two stores in height of other
than Groups R, Division 3 end M occupancies shall indicate
how required structural end [ire-resistive integrity will be
maintained where a penetration will be made for electrical,
mechanical, plumbing and communication conduits, pipes end
similar systems.
Plans for grading work shall contain the information
specified in Section 7008 0[ the Uniform Building Code as
adopted and emended in Section 15.12.200 of this code.
15.08.070 Section 3a3(e) Amended--issuance. Section 303(al
of the Uni arm A tnistrative Code is hereby emended to read as
follows:
Section 303(x) Issuance. The application, plans end
specifications, end other date, filed by an applicant for
;~ permit shall be reviewed 6y the Building Official and may be
reviewed by other departments of this jurisdiction [o verity
compliance with any applicable laws under their
jurisdiction. It the Building Official finds that the work
described in the application for a permit and the plans,
7~
specifications and other data tiled therewith conform to the
requirements of this code and the technical codes end other •
pertinent laws and ordinances, and that the tees specified in
Section 304 have been paid, he shall issue a permit therefor
to the applicant.
Exceptions:
Electrical permits shall only be issued to u person
or persons qualifying under one or more of the
following categories:
a• A state licensed contrsctor or
authorized representative of a state
licensed contrnetor but only to the
extent and for the work the person is
licensed by the State of California to
do.
b• A bonaf ids owner of a single family
dwelling for electrical work within thst
dwelling, including buildings and
quarters accessory thereto.
c• A person, firm or corporation reguisrly
employing one or more quslifled
maintenance electricians. •
d• A representative of a charitable, non-
profit organization [or temporary work
in connection wtLh Christmsa tree lost,
- r. :a%„ i:rewurka stenca end similar
non-permanent instellationa, provided
that work covered by the permit is to be
performed by members of the organization
and furthermore thst there are to be no
persons employed at the lcoetion where
such temporary wiring is installed.
Such permit shall expire within a time
specified by the Building Official, not
exceeding six {g) months t1me, and shall
not be renewed.
A representative o[ another city,
county, stele district or other
political subdivision [or electrical
work to be performed on the premises of
said political subdivision.
When the Bu[Iding Official issues the permit where plena are
required, he shell endorse in writing or stamp the plena and
specifications ^APPROYED^. Such approved plane end
specifications shall not be changed, modified or altered •
without euthorizntiona [ram the Building Official, end all
work shalt be done In eeeordance with the approved plans.
~a
The Building Official may issue a permit for the construction
• of part of a building, structure or building service
equipment before the entire plans and specificat[ons for the
whole building, structure or building service equipment have
been submitted or approved, provided adequate information and
detailed statements have been filed complying with all
pertinent requirements of the technical codes. The holder of
such permit shall proceed at his own risk without assurance
that [he permit for the entire building, structure or
building service will be granted.
15.08.080 Section 303(d) Amended--Ez iretion. Section
303(d o said Uni orm Administrative Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Section 303(d) Expiration. Every permit issued by the
Building Official under the provisions of the technical codes
shall expire by limitation end become null end void, i[ the
building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced
within 180 days from the date of such permit, or it the
building or work authorized Dy such permit is suspended or
abandoned at any time after the work is eomnenced for a
period of 180 days. Before such woek can be recommenced, a
new permit shall be first obtained so to do, end the fee
therefore shell be one-half the amount required for a new
permit for such work, provided no changes have Deen made or
• will be mode to the original plans and specifications for
such work; and provided further that such suspension or
abandonment has not exceeded one year.
Any permittee holding an unexpired permit may apply, for an
extension of thP. times. wifAin mA:wA . .. ...........___ ...__.. .._ ..
permit, when he is unable to commence work within the time
required Dy this seotion for good and satisfactory reasons. The
Building Official may extend the time for action by the permittee
for s period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the
permittee showing that eireumstences beycnd the control of the
permittee have prevented action from being taken. No permit
shell be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an
extended permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new
ul~ permit tee.
Section 3 o said Unl orm Administrative ode is~hereby~eme
by adding subsection (f) to rend as follows:
Section 303(f) Unfinished Buildings and Structures. whenever
the Building Official determinea by inspection that work in
or on any building or structure for which a permit has been
issued end the work started thereon has been suspended for e
period of 180 days or more, the owner of the property upon
which such building or structure is located or at4er person
or agent in control of said property, upon receipt of notice
in writing from the Building Official to do ao, shall, within
90 days from the date of such written notice, obtain a new
permit to complete the requtred work and diligently pursue
73
the work to completion or shall remove or demolish the
building or structure within 180 days from date o[ the •
written notice.
15.08.100 Section 304 Amended--Fees. Section 304 of said
Uniform A6nlnistrntive Code is hereby amended to read as tollowst
Section 304(a) Pees. The fee [or each permit shall be as
established by Resolution of the City Council. The
determination of value or valuation under any of the
provisions of this code shell 6e made Dy the Building
Official. The value to be used in computing the building
permit end building plea review teen shall be the total value
of ell construction work for which the permit is issued as
well na all finish work, painting, roofing, eleetricel,
plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, elevators, fire
ext(ngutshing systama end any other permanent equipment.
Whenever any work, for which a permit is required Dy this
Code, hen been catmeneed without first obtaining ssid permit,
end when such work is discovered es n result of an
investigation Dy the Building Otficiel or his duly authorised
representstive, the permit teas specified Dy the Ctty Council
shall be doubled. The payment of such double tee shall not
eaempt any person from compliance with all other provisions
of this Code nor tram any penslty preseriDed Dy law.
Section 304(b) Plen Review Faea. When a plan or other date •
is required to De submitted by Subsection (b) of Section 302,
a plan review tee shell be paid et the time of submitting
plans and specifications for review. Payment of a plan
review fee shall h. nnn.lA...n _...:. -
the work described on the epplicetion form rend ntor ~~whieh the
plan review tee is paid.
Where plans ere incomplete or changed so ea to require
additional plan review, en additional plan review tee shall
be charged.
Fees for plan review shell be as set forth by City Council
Resolution.
Section 304(c) Expiration of Plen Review. Applications [or
which no permit la issued within 180 days followl ng the date
of application shall expire by limitation, and plena end
other date submitted for review may thereafter be returned to
the applicant or destroyed by the Building Official.
The Building Otticial may extend the time for action by the
applicant, for a period not exceeding 180 days, upon written
request, showing that c(rcumatancea beyond the control of the
epplicent have prevented action from being ,aken. No
epplicetion shall be extended more then once. in ,order to
renew action on en application after expiration, the
epplicent shall resubmit plans end psy a new plan review tee.
7Y
(d) Exemption Prom Fees. Neither the State nor this nor any
other county, city, district, or other political subdivision,
nor any public officer or Dody acting in Ais official
capacity on hehalt of the State or of this or any county,
city, district, or other political subdivision shall pny or
deposit any fee required 6y this code. This Section does not
apply to the State Canpensetion Insurance Pund or Public
Housing Authority or where a public officer is acting with
reference to private assets which have come under his
jurisdiction by virtue of his otfice.
(e) Refunds. In the event that any person shell have
obtained s permit end no portion of the work or conatructi on
covered by such permit shell have been cartmenced and such
permit shall hsve expired as provided for in Subsection (d)
of Section 302, the permlttee, upon presentation to the
Building Ofticinl of n written request, shnll be entitled to
e refund in nn amount equal to eighty percent (SO%) of the
permit fee sdtually paid for sucA permit; however, the
portion of the tee retained by the City shell never be less
than twenty dollars (120.00) or the tot el amount paid,
whichever is less. In toe event a permit is issued in error
by the Building Of ticial, ell tees shall be returned to
applicant upon written request.
No refund shall be granted when receipt of the request occurs
• more then 180 dsys [oilowing payment of the permit or pian
check tee. No portion of a plsn checking fee shell be
refunded, unless no checking has been performed on a set of
plans, in which dose eighYq percent (SO%) of the plan
checking fee shell be refunded; however, the oortinn ~t !hc
fee rern:n.^ ^.`.cll „e rur oe less than twenty dollars,
(520.00), or the total amount paid, whichever is less.
The Building Of ticial shall satisfy himsalt as to the right
of such applicant to such refund end each such refund shall
be paid es provided by law for the payment o[ claims ngainst
the City.
15.08.110 9ectton 305(h) Amended--Reins rations. Section
3nS(h o se;d Un; orm Administrative Code is hereby emended to
read es follows:
Section 305(h) Reinspections. A reinspection tee, as set
forth in City Council Resolution, may be assessed for each
i nspeetion made necessary due to work not being reedy et the
time inspection is requested or for work not corrected after
prior written notice. In instances where reinepections tees
have been assessed, no additional inspection of the work
shell be performed until the required fees have barn paid.
15.08. t20 9ectton 307(x) Amended--Fort Connection.
Section 0 e o sa d nl orm Adman strat;ve o e is hereby
emended to read es follows;
7S
9eetion 307(s) Energy Connection. No person shell make •
connections from a source of energy, fuel ar power to any
building service equipment which is regulated by the
technics] codes and for which a permit is required by this
code, unless ouch required permits ere obtained end
npplicable final building, electrical, plumbing and/or
mechanical inapactions have been made end ell conditions of
development approval have been completed or gusranteed,
eacept sa provided for in Subsectlon(d).
SHCTION 8. Anew Chapter 15.12 is hereby added to the Rnneho
Cucemongn Municipsl Code to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
Chapter 15.12
Building Code
Sections
15.12.010 Chapters 1,2,a Dslated
15.12.020 9ect[on 420 Added datinition--
9wimming Pool
15.12.030 Seation 1101 Amended--Droop "M"
Occupancies
15.12.040 •
Section 1103 Amended--Fire-Raaistive
Protection
13.12.050 Section 1105 Amended--Garage Floor
Surfsaea
15.12.afla a.we,..r .Ins ~-La3:... °uw i.8.:iue 8uvi
Fencing
15.12.070 Section 1210 (n) Amended--Fire
Warning System
15.12.080 Seation 1704 (a) Amended--Roof Coverings
15.12.090 Seation 1717 Added--Underfloor Areas
15.12.100 Table 23-D Amended--Allowable Deflection
15.12.L10 9eetion 2907(b) Amended--Beaeing Wails
15.12.120 Figure 20-1 Amended--Building Setbacks
tram DaecendinQ Slopes
15.12.130 Seation 320T(e) Nnandad--Root
Construction and Materials
15.12.140 Section 3203 (f) Amended--Ordinary
Roof Covering
15.12.150 Section 3203 (g) Deleted
15.12.100 9eetion 3709 Added--Spark Arrestor
15.12.170 Append[x Chapter 12 Deleted
15.12.180 Appendix Saetlon 3210 Amended--Reroofing
13.12.190 Appendix 9action 7003--Exempt Grading
15.12.200 Appendix 9action 7004--Haaardoua Grading
15.12.210 Appendix 9action 7005 Added
•
De[initions--Final, Preliminary
Grading Ptans
13.12.220 Appendix Section 7008 Amended--Permits
Required
7~j
• 15,12.230 Appendix Section 7007 Amended--Plan
Review Pees
15.12.240
15
12
250 Appendix Section 7008 Amended--Bonds
.
.
15.12
260 .4p~endix Section 7010 Amended--Fills
. Appendix Section 7013 Amended--Erosion
Controls
15.12.010 Cha
3 o
id taro 1 2 and 3--Deleted. Chapters 1
2
and
sa
Uni orm
entirety. Building Code are hereby ,
,
deleted in tAeir
Section 4 0 o said Uni orm wilding Code pis Vhe
addition of the following definition:
Section 420. Swimming Pool is any body of water cree fed by
artificial means designed or used for swimming, immersion or
therapeutic purposes.
Section 11 1 0
read as follows:
a
Section 1101. Group M Occupeneies shall De:
• Division 1. Private Garages, carports, sheds end similar
structures accessory to residential structures, and
agricultural buildings.
Division 2. Fences over 6 feet high, tanks, towers and
swl mmino nnni.
For occupancy separations, see Table 5-B.
aec[[on 1103 of said Uni orm Building ode is
reed as follows:
Section 1103. Por fire-resistive protection of exterior
walls end openings es determined by location on property, see
Section 504, Part IV, end Appendix Chapter I1.
Sectionl 11 SOo sacs dio ni to ~m ui de ng Co erase ereo yr amen fed eto
read as fuliowq:
Section 1105. Garage floor surfaces in building areas where
motor vehicles ere operated or stored shall be of
noncombustible, nonabsorbent construction.
~~ 15.12.080 Section 110T(a) Amended--Swimmin Pool Pencin .
Section I10 o said Uni orm Building Code is hereby emended to
read as follows:
7~
Section 1107(a). Swimming Pool Fencing. Every person in
possession of land under a confect t, or as owner, lessee, •
tenant, licensee, or otherwise, upon which is situated e
swimming pool, having a water depth exceeding I$ inches,
shalt, at ell times, maintain a fence or other structure
completely surrounding such pool and extending not less then
five feet (S'0"), measured vertically, above any walking
surface, wall or other c1lmaDle structure, within two feet
(2'0") of the exterior of the enclosure. Openings in such
fence or structure, other then those created Dy gates or
doors, shall be of such size so that n sphere exceeding 4" (4
inches) in diameter will not pass between ed~acent members.
Members of such pool enclosure shall not De arranged so as to
materially facilitate climbing or scaling by small children.
Gales or door openings through such enclosure shall be
equipped with Belt closing end self-latching devices designed
to keep, end capable of keeping, such door or gate securely
closed nt all times when not in actual use; however, the door
of any dwelling occupied Dy human Doings whteh forms any pert
of the enclosure hereto required need not be eo equipped.
Required latching devices shall be located not less than tour
feet, six inches (4'-a^) above the ground. The pool
enclosure shall De In place end approved by the Building
Official before wstee is placed in the pool.
EXCEPTIONS:
The provisions of this section shall not apply to
public swimming pools regulated Dy 9tete Building
9tendards approved by the Slate Buildi nv 4tsnn..,t^
Gomnrssron.
2. Any fencing serving ea an enclosure for a swimming
pool, lawfully in existence on the date of adoption
of this ordinance, end meeting the requirements [or
fencing In effect at the time of eonstructlon of
the swimming pool, may be continued, however, any
replacement of fencing in whole or in part, shalt
comply with the requirements set torah above.
b) Where applicable (see Section t03) for egriculturet
buildings, see Appendix Chapter.
15.12.070 9ectfon 1210 e) emended--fire Warnin S stems.
Section 1 1 a o said ni orm Bu ding Code is ereby amen ed
to read as follows:
•
Section 1210(e). Pi re-Warning Systems. Every dwelling unit
end every guest roam In a Dotal or lodging house used for
sleeping purposes shall be provided with smo4e detectors
conforming to U.B.C. 9tandsrd No. 43-8. In dwelling units, •
detectors shell be mounted on the calling or well at a point
centrally located in the corridor or Brea giving access to
rooms used for sleeping purposes. In an efficiency dwelling
7~
• unit, hotel sleeping room and in hotel suites, the detector
shall be centrally located on the ceiling o[ the mein roam or
hotel steeping room. Where sleeping rooms are on nn upper
level, the detector shall be placed at the center of the
ceiling directly above the stairway. All detectors ahll be
Located in accordance witA approved manufacturer's
instructions. When actuated, the detector shall provide an
alarm in the dwelling unit or guest room.
When habitable space having a valuation exceeding 51,000.00
or when one or more sleeping rooms are added or ereeted in
e:fisting Group R, Division 3 Occupancies, the entire
building shall be provided with smoke detectors located as
required for new Group R, Division 3 Occupanicea.
In new construction, required smoke detectors shell receive
their primary power from the building wiring when such wiring
to served Iran s commercial source. Wiring shall be
permanent and without a disconnecting switch other than those
required for overeurrent protection. Smoke detectors may be
battery operated when Installed in existing buildings, or in
buildings which undergo altersttons, repairs or additions
regulated by the second peragrsph of this section.
A smoke deleetor shall be installed in the basement of
• dwelling unite having n stairway which opens from the
basement into the dwelling. Such detector shall De connected
to n sounding device or other detector to provide en alarm
which will De sudible in the sleeping seen.
15.12.080 Section 1704 Amend•n__w....r r...... ~.. __
r:ua o[ Snid Uniform wilding Co a :s hereby emende~ to rend~as
follows:
Section 1704(x) Root Coverings. Root coverings shell be fire
retardant except in Types III,IV and V buildings, where it
may be es follows:
Ordinary root coverings may be used on buildings of
Group R, Division 3 or Group N Occupancies.
2• Clesa C roof coverings which comply with U.B.C.
Standard No. 32-T may be used on Group R, Division 1
Occupancies which ere not more then two stories in
height and Rave not more then 5000 square feet of
projected root area end there is a minimum of 10 feet
from the extremity of the root to the property lines on
alt sides except for street fronts. Root mounted
skylights shell be constructed es required in Chapter
34. Penthouses shell be constructed es squired in
d,~ Chapter 33. Por use of plastics in roofs, see Chapter
52. Por Attic access end area, gee Section 3203. For
Roo[ Drainage, see Section 3207.
7/
(b) Fire Stopping. Roo[ coverings having openings s[ eaves
which would sllow the entrance of embers or flames shall De •
tire-stopped et cave ends to preclude entry of embers or
flames under the root covering.
15.12.090 Section 1717 Added--Underfloor Aress. Chapter 17
of said nl orm ull ng Code is hereby amen a Dy addition of
Section 1717 t0 read as follows:
Section 1717. Underfloor Aresa. Ruiidinga or structures
shall have all underfloor erase enclosed to the ground with
conatruotien ss required for exterior wells.
ERCHFTIONS:
Enclosure is not required when the underside of all
ezposed floors end ell exposed structural columns,
beams and supporting walls are of non-conbustible
construction or protected with one-hour ttre
resistive materials.
The underside of cantilevered wood balaonles and
unroofed walking "decks", constructed entirel of
2^ or greater nominal thickness wood y
joists and
decking, need not De enalosad.
Woad structural members having • minimum dimension •
of 8^ nominal, tongue end groove flooring of 1 t/2"
net thickness or plywood flooring o[ 1 1/8" net
thickness need not be enclosed or fire-protected.
!~ '_2 ~~~ TG.:G :-u ~uvuuvu--AllowaDlO ueilee a on. Table
27-D o sn: Un orm ~u ng o e la ere y amen a to read, in
words and figures, es follows:
TAlId !i-D Itli[IW ALLOIYlL[ DRL[LTIQI
!Q glaQylD[aL 1~0[a
am IQaD® IIITN
I~R IdlOm LIYg IGaD PI.IIe
TTr6 l3P Llv[ LDaD /111.7
L.L. Dgap LOAD
L.L. • [ D.L.
Ploor lembu a, Root Memeeea
Supporting Plu ter, Root
Nemberv Supporting Deed Loads
Esceeding SO Pe reont of Ll va L/Oe0 L/t{0
Lo da
•auftlcient al ope or cameer mall ee provl dad for flat roofr in
accordance vieh Section 2305(!1.
L.L. • Llve Loa0
D,L. s peed Load •
k = Pastor de grmi Md ey raele No. 20-g
L = Le ogre of mamear in same uni b as datlaetion
£s0
• 15.12.110 Section 290T(D) Amended--Beartn Walls. Section
2807 b o said Uni orm Building Code a hereby emended to reed
as follows:
Section 2907(b). Bearing Walls. Bearing walls shell be
supported nn masonry or concrete toundatt one or piles or
of N: epprovad foundation system which shell be of sufficient
size to support all loads. Whore a design is not provtded,
the minimum foundation requl cements for stud besting wells
shall be ea set forth in Table No. 29-A.
ERCEPTIONSi
A One story wood or metal Ireme building not used
for h~anan occupancy and not over 200 square feet In
floor areas may be conateucted wTt F~out masonry or
concrete toundetIona it walla are supported Dy e
Portland cement cone rote slab not less than 9 1/2^
in thickness.
2. TM support of Dullding^ by posts embedded in earth
shalt ba designed a speoi[ied in 9eetion
2907(f). Wood posts or poles embedded in earth
shall ha pressure treated with an approved
preasrvative. Steel poets or poles shall De
protected as specified in Bactton 290t(h).
• 15.12.120 Plrure 29-1 Amended--BUildinr 9atbacKs from
PACE OF
H/2 BUT NEED
NOT EXCEED 15'
H/3 OR 5' MIN,
BUT NEED NOT
EXCEED 40'
OF STRUCTURE
~ FIGURE N0. 29-1
~/
15.12.190 Section 3202 )a) Amended--Root Construction and •
Materials. act on a s Hereby amended to rea as ollows:
Section 3202(e). Roof Construction and Materials. Roo[
covering shall be securely fastened to the supporting root
construction and shell provide weather protection for the
building et the root. In locations designated as Special Wind
Regions on Pigure No. 4, Chapter 23, the Building Ofttelal may
require aupplamentary fastening or attachment methods to those
specified in Table No. 32-8.
Spaced sheathing for wood roots shall be spaced not to exceed
8^ clear nor more than the nem[nal width of the sheathing
board. Sheathing boards shall be not leas than 1 Inch by 4
inches nanlnal dimension.
Diagonal end sway bracing shell be used to brace all roof
trusses.
10.12.140 Section 3203 t Amandad--Ordinae Boot Coveria
Sect[on o s• n orm u ng o a a era y amen ad
to read as follows:
Section 3203([). Ordinary Root Covering. M ordinary root
covering shalt be any one of the following roofings:
1. Any root covering listed in Section 3203(a). •
2. My built-up roofing assembly not lase than Class C
roofing.
s. any mineral aggregate surface built-up root [or
application to roots hsving a slope of not more
then 3 inches to 12 Inches applied as specified in
Section 3203(d) 2, consisting of not leas than the
following:
Base Sheet and Pllas
Three layers of Type 13 organic or inorganic fiber
felt, and
Surtsctna Material
300 pounds per roofing aqusre of grovel or other
approved surfacing material, or 200 paunde per
roofing aquas of orushed sing in 50 pounds of
asphalt, or 80 pounds o[ pitch.
4. Any prepared rooting not teas than
Ctaas C roofing.
•
~~
. E7CCEPT[ON: Unless otherwise required because of
location as specified in Parts IV end V of this
code, Group M, Division 1 root coverings may
consist of not less than one layer of 55-pound
smooth-surfaced organic cep sheet, or built-up
rooting consisting of two layers of Type IS organic
fiber felt and one layer of surfacing material as
specified on Section 3203(f)3.
15.12.150 Section 3203(¢) Deleted. Section 3203(8) of said
Uniform Building Coda is hereby deleted.
15.12.160 Section 3703 Added--S ark Arrestor. Section 3703
of sa:d Uni orm Buil ng Coe to hereby amended by adding n new
subsection (h) to reed as follows:
Seation 3703 (h) Spark Arrestor. My chimney, flue, vent,
oe stovepipe attached to any solid or liquid fuel burning
fireplace, stove, barbeque, or other similar dev[ce hereafter
installed within or attaahed to any building or atruature,
shall be equipped with en spproved spark arrestor. A spark
arrestor is defined as a device constructed of non-
combustible materiel equivalent to 12 gauge steel welded or
woven wire mesh or 3!18^ thlak cast iron plate. Perforations
or openings in spark arrestors shall be not leas then one-
• hell inch (1/2") and not larger than five-eights inches,
(5/S") and shall be of suttlcient number so na not to reduce
the required flue ores. Spark arrestors shall be Inatelled
in such a manner ea to be visible for inspection end
accessible for maintenance.
15.12.170 endix Che ter 12 Deleted. Appendix Chapter 12
of the Uni orm u:l ng Coe is hereby elated.
15.12.160 A endix Section 3210 Amended--Rerootin Seation
3210 o the Append x o the Unl orm Bu 1 Ing ode is hereby
emended to reed es follows:
Section 3210. Reroofing. New roof coverings for existing
buildings shell not be applied without first obtaining s
permit therefor tr om the Building Official. An inspection
may be required to determine the ecceptabll{ty o[ an existing
structure for reroofing. A final inspection and approval
shall De obtained from the Building Official when reroofing
is completed.
15.12.190 A endix Section 7003 Nnended--Exam t Gredin .
Section 7003 o the Appendix o the Un orm Build ng Code is
hereby emended to read ea follows:
Section 7003. Exempt Grading. No person ;hall do any
grading without first having obtained a grading permit from
the Buitding Official except for the following:
83
1. Removal of surface deposits of improperly pieced •
materiel or refuse.
2. M excavation below finished grade for basements
and footings of a building, retaining well or other
structure authorized by a valid building permit.
This shall not exempt any till made with the
material from such excavation nor ezempt any
excavation having an unsupported height greater
than S feet otter the completion of such structure.
3. Cemetery graves.
4. Refuse disposal sites controlled by other
regulations.
S. Rxeavetione for wells or tunnels or ut[lf ties.
8. Mining, quarrying, excavating, processing,
stockpiling of rock, nand, gravel, aggregate or
clay where estaDllshad and provided for by law,
provided such operations do not affect the lateral
support or Increase the strauu In or pressure
upon any adjacent or contiguous property.
7. 6:ploratory exasvations under the direetton of soil •
engineers or eng(neering geologists.
8. M excavation which (a) to loss than 2 feet in
depth, or (b) which does not crests a cut alone
yPadicr :i,an o ieec ~n neignt end steeper then two
horizontal to one vertical (2:1) and that [s of
teas then 100 sable yards.
9. A till leas then L toot [n depth; placed on natural
terrain with slope not ezeeeding S hor[zontal to 1
vertical (S:1), provided that the grading is in an
isolated, salt-contained aces end does not endanger
private or puDlie property.
L0. Pill less then 3 teat in depth and not exceeding
100 cubic yards, placed on a single pe: ¢el,
provided that the till does net obstruct a drainage
course.
11. An excavation for pipeline or other underground
utility lines installed under a separate permit,
provided that any necessary eroaton control
measures ere made pert of that permit.
t2. PuDiic Works projects not requiring s building •
permit Including sewer and storm drain
construction, ut[l[ty trenohes, power transmission
lines end appurtenant access roads and retaining
walls or grading ac¢omplisAed ns part of street
maintenance aativitiaa. O~/
• 13. Recurr[ng, regularly scheduled maintenance of
existing facilities where no new construction is
involved.
14. Emergency repairs to existing facilities resulting
from natural or civil disaster including, but not
limited to, rainstorm, flooding, earthalide, heat
storm, earthquake, riot, sabotage, and the like.
15.12.200 A endix Section 7004 Amended--Haaerdous
din¢. Section 0 4 o t o Appendix o the Uni orm uilding
e is hereby emended to read as follows:
Section T006. Hszardous Grading. lyhenever the Building
Officlel determines that any existing natural atope, or any
excavation, embankment, till or other condition created by e
grading project hea become n hazard to life or limb, or
endangers property, or adversely affects the safety, use or
stability of n public way or drainage chennet, the Build[ng
Official may give the owner of the property upon which the
condition is located, or other person or agent in control of
said property, a written notice to abate the condition. Upon
receipt of such written notice from the Building Official,
the owner or other person or agent in control of said
property shall within the period apecltied in the notice
. repair or eliminate such natural slope, excavation,
embankment, till or other condition so es to eliminate the
hazard and be in conformance with the requirements of this
Code.
is i~ non ;....~;dl~ °attim, Su"ue nudeu--Deitn:t:ons. section
7005 o the Appen :x o the Uni orm uilding Coe is hereby
emended by adding the following definitions:
Pinal Gradin Plan is s plan shooing all detailed
drainage (n ormation, grade elevations, locations end
floor elevations of any buildings.
Preliminary Gradlna Plen is a plan showing bu[lding pad
elevat:ons, typical drainage methods to be utilized,
end similar generalized information, usually excluding
finish floor elevations, building locations, end
specific drainage details.
--• ~ enu,n aecc:on ~ruus Amended--Permits Re wired.
Section 7006 o the Appendix o the Uni orm utl ng Code is
hereby emended to reed es follows:
Section 7006(x). Permits Required. Except es exempted in
Section 7003 of this Code, no person shall do any grading
without first obtelning a grading permit from :tie Building
e~ Official. A separate permit shall be required [or each site,
end may cover both excevationa and tills. Grading permits
may De issued based upon sutxnittai of either n preliminary or
O~
final grading plan. The preliminary grading plan .
requirements shall apply where insufficient precise detail of
site improvement exists et the time of grading permit
issuance. Where grading is accomplished based upon e
preliminary gradtng plan the submittal end approvsl of a
tinsl grading plan shall be required prior to the issuance of
any building permit for the site. Preliminary grading plans
shall include sutfieient detail to assure that at the time of
final grading plan submit! el, all standards end
specifications of this code and other City grading
regulations will be met.
(b) Appliention. The provis[ons of Section 302(b) ere
applicable to gradtng and in addition the spplieatlon shall
state the estimated quantities of work involved.
(c) Plans end Spectf lcationa. WAan required Dq the Building
Official, esch application [or a grading permit shall be
aoeampanied bq three seta of plans •nd specifications, and
supporting dat• aonsiating of a soils engineering report and
engineering geology report. Tha plena •nd spacitlcatlons
shall be prepared and s[gned by a civil engineer when
required Dy the Building Ottieiat.
(d) lnf ormation on Plans and [n Spealtications. Plan shall
be drawn to scale upon substantial paper or clotA and shell •
be of auttieient clarity to indicate the nature end extent of
the work proposed •nd show in detail that it will conform to
the provisions of this Code end ell relevant laws,
ordinances, rules and regulations. TAe lira! sheet of esch
cf p:euo ai:.ii give ine iocarion of the work and name end
address of the owners end the person Dy wAom they were
prepared. The plans shall ineiude the following information:
General vicinity of the proposed site.
2. Property limits and accurste contours of existing
ground and details of terrain and area drainage.
3. Elevations end tins sh contours to De achieved by
the grading.
4. Detei:ed plans of ell surteee end subsurface
drai nege device a, walls, cribbing, dens and other
protective devices to be conatrueted with, or es e
pert ot, the proposed work toge[her wl[n a map
showing the dreinsge area end the estimated runoff
of the Brea served Dy any drsina.
5. Location of any buildings or structures on the
property where the work Is to be performed and the .
location of any buildings or structures on land o[
nd)saent owners which •r• witAin IS feet of the
protect ails or which may De •ttected by the
proposed gradtng operations.
Sd
• 6. Siae, type and condition o[ vegetation that is to
remain.
7. Legal restrictions such as property lines,
easements, setb neks, etc.
8. Utility structures, catch Daslns, manholes,
culverts, etc.
9. Dr ninege, aewe r, water, gas, electric or other
util[ty lines.
10. Any unusual site conditions.
Contours, both existing and proposed, shall De shown in
accordance with the following schedule:
Natural Slopes Maximum interval
295 or less 2 feet
Over R46 to end including 9% S feet
Over 8% 10 feet
Specificatlona shell contain information oovar[ng
construction end material requirements.
• (e ). Soil Engineering Eeport. The soils engineering report
required by subsection (c) shell include dsts regarding the
nature, distribution and strength of existing soils,
conclusions end recommendations for gredtng procedures and
Am in wi~w.i. L. •~.
_ __ n n _ ~ -.____ _ __. _..~2b i7ue7. uaua eaary, anu
opinions and recommendations covering adequacy of sites to
be developed by the proposed gredtng, including the atsbility
of slopes.
(g). Issuance. The provisions of Section 303 are applicable
to grading permits. The Building Official may slso require
submittal o[ the following adds tionsl information with the
permit applicstion.
1, Extent end manner of cutting of trees and clearing
of vegetation, disposal of same, end measures for
protection of undisturbed trees end/or vegetation.
2. Schedule defining staging end timing of
constructicn end estimated extent of disturbance at
strstegic points during construction.
3. Equipment, methods, and location of spoils
diapossl.
~~ 4. A plan defining the schedule, equ[pment, materials,
end personnel that witl be used to maintain all
protective devices and drainage tacliltles shown on
the approved grading plan.
8` 7
Designation of routes upon which materials may De •
transported and means of acce sa to the site.
The location and manner to be used for disposal of
excavated materiels and control of erosion from
such materiels.
7. Requirements ns to the mitigation of fugitive dust
and dirt wAicA msy be offensive or injuro us to the
neighborhood, the general public or any portion
thereof, including due consideration, care, and
reepeat toe the property rights, convenience, and
reasonable desires end the needs of said
neighborhood or any portion thereof.
8. Limitations on the area, extent and duration of
time of exposure of unprotected soil surfaces.
9. My grading or drainsge mitigating measures
specified in nn Environmental Impact Itep.,rt
preperad toe the site pursusnt to the Celifurnia
Envlronmentel Quality Act.
10. My grading or drsInege requirements included ns
condttions of approvsl of a project on the site by
tha Planning Commission or the City Council. •
11. Phasing of operations to minimize water run oft or
other enviroronentel concerns.
... owt, auui iivuei eppiiceote rat ormatton es the
Building Official rosy require to carry out the
purposes of this ordinance.
(h). Compliance with Plana and Code. The permittee or his
agent, shall carry out the proposed work in accordance with
the approved plans and specitiastions and in compliance with
ell the requirements of this Code.
(i). Inspections. [n performing regular grading, it shall
be the reaponaibility of the permittee to notify the Building
Official nt least one working dsy in advance so that required
inspections msy be made.
(11• Protection of Adjacent Property. During grading
operations, the permittee shnti 6e responsible for the
prevention of damage to adjacent property and no person shell
excavate on land auflletentty close to the property line to
endanger any edjotning public street, sidewalk, alley, or
other public or private property without supporting and
protecting such property from settling, cracking, or other •
damage which might result.
88
• (k). Temporary Erosion Control. The permi ilea shell put
Into effect and maintain all precautionary meeaures necessary
to protect adjacent water courses and public or private
property tram damage by erosion, flooding, and deposition of
mud or deDria originating from the site.
•
15.12.230 A endi: Cha ter 7007 Amended--Plan Review Pees.
Section 700 o t e Appendia o the Uni orm Building Code s
hereby amended to reed as tollowa:
Section 7007(x). Plan Review Fees. NTen a plan and/or other
data ere required to De aumitted, a plan review fee shall be
paid et the time of submitting plane and speci[icetiona for
review. Said plan review fee aheli De as set forth in City
Council resolution. Separate plan review fees shell apply to
retaining walls and major drainage structures.
(b). Grading Permit Fees. A fee for each grading permit
shall be paid to the Build[ng Otf iciel na eat forth in City
Council Resolution. 9eparste permits and permit fees shell
apply to retaining wails and major drainage ate ucturea as eat
forth in the Unltorm Administrative Code for building
permits. Construet[on valuet[on toe major drainage
structures shall be determined based upon en estimste of the
coat of their construction provided by the designer and
approved by the Building Official.
Where preliminary and tinnl grading plans are submitted
separately for plan checking and/or permit, tees shall 6e
enlculnted from the work to be eccompltahed under each
submltest.
The fee for a grading permit authorizing additional work to
that under a valid permit shalt be the difference between the
tee paid for the original permit and the fee shown for the
entire project.
15.12.240 A endix Section 7008 Amended--Bonds. Section
7008 o the Appen : o the ni orm Buil ing Coe is hereby
emended to read ns follows:
Section T008(a). Bonds. Prior to the issuance o[ a grading
permit involv[ng 5000 cubic yards or more of cut and till,
the applicant shell first post with the Building Official, a
bond executed Dy the owner es principal and a corporate
surety authorized to do business in this State. (n lieu of e
surety bond, the applicant may file a cosh bond, or deposit
and assign to the Ctty, savings end loan certificates or
other instruments of credit.
Where unusual condl Ilona or special hazard axial, the
Building Official may require a bond for grading involving
less then 5000 cubic yerda.
8~
The bond required by this Section may include tncidentel off- •
alto grading on property contiguous with the site to be
developed provided written consent of the owner of such
contiguous property is tiled with the Building Official. The
Bultdtng Official may waive the requirements for grading
necessary to remove a geological hazard, where such work is
covered by an agreement and bond posted pursusnt to
provisions of other Ordinances.
(b). Amount of Bonds. The amount of the bond shall be based
upon the number of cuDto yards of rtuteriei in both exoavation
and tilt, plus the coat of all drainage or other protective
devices, work necessary to eliminate geological haznrde,
erosion control planting and required retei ning walls, end
masonry fenoes. That portion of the bond val ustion based on
the volume of material ehnll be computed as set forth in the
following schedule:
100,000 cubio yards or feas.......50% of the coat et
the grading work
Over 100,000 cuDie yards..........50% of the coat of
the first 100,000 cubic
yards plan 43% of tM
estimated coat of that
portion in excess of •
100,000 ouDie yards.
(c). Reduction in Bond. When rough grading has been
completed In conformance with the requirements of this CnA..
tLe nuiiuing t)ii:c ai may et his discretion consent to e
proportionate reduction of the bond to en amount estimated to
be adequate to insure completion of the grading work, site
development or planting remaining to be performed. The coats
referred to in thin 9eetion shall be as estimated Dy~ the
Building Official.
(d). Conditions. Every bond shall include the cond[tions
thst the principal shell:
Comply with ell of the provisions of City
ord[nnnaea, applicable :aws, end standards.
Comply with ell of the terms end conditions o[ the
grading permit.
Complete all of the work authorized Dy the permit
within the time limit specified in the permit or
within any extension thereof granted. No such
extension of time shalt release the su^ety upon the
bond. •
90
• (e). Term of Bond. The term of each Dond shall begin upon
the tiling thereof with the Building Official end the bond
shall remain in effect until the work authorized by the
grading permit is completed and approved Dy the Building
Official.
(t). Default procedures. In the event the owner or his
agent obeli toil to complete the work or tail to comply with
all terms and conditions of the grading permit, it shall be
deemed a default has occurred. The eullding Official shall
give notice thereof to the principal and surety on the
grading permit Dond, or to the owner in the case of s cash
deposit or nssl gtanent, and may order the work required to
ednplete the grading in contormanee with the requirements of
this Code be performed. The surety executing the bond shell
continue to ba firmly bound under an obligation up to the
full amount of the Dond, for the payment of ell necessary
costs and e:pensas that may De incurred by the Building
Official in causing say and all auah required work to be
done. In the eas• ct a sash deposit or •saigmtent, the
unused portion of suoh deposit or funds assigned shall ba
returned or reassigned to the parson tusking said deposit or
ssaignnent.
(g). Right of Entry. The Building Official or the
• suthorlaed representattvs of the surety company shall have
cacaos to the premiaea described in the permit for the
purpose of inspecting the work. In the avant of default in
the performance of any farm or condition of the permit the
surety or the Building Offieisl, or any pare on employed or
enaeveA in th. n.n.lr ..f .;S•e:, ...:1/ us.e tine rigid co go
upon the premises to perform the required work.
The owner or any other person who interferes with or
obatruets the ingreaa to or agrees tram any such premises, of
any authorized raprsaentetive of the surety or of the City of
Reecho Cucamonga engaged in the correction or completion of
the work for which a grading permit has been issued, after a
default hea occurred in the performance of the terms or
conditions thereof, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
15.12.250 A endix Section 7010 Amended--Fills. Section
7010 o t e Append x o the ni orm u~l ng ode is hereby
emended to read na tollowas
l`J
~~
Section 7030(a). Fills, Unless otherwise recommended in the
approved soils engineering report and approved by the •
Building Official, fills shell conform to the provisions of
this Sectian end to Pigure A, Typical Lat Cross-Section for
Fills.
~~~
L
,ra i ~ ~'
e•...~..w ~.. r w .......n
.,wn rrn, a, •M r• .w •,M..i•.
NY r .,tl•Y,r M. YM.
- %r,rT,r~ `aaNew saNlaa Ir ^•+,a.~
i~ ( aLara cNaoa awm .aane•~
tar ar our Nora n rwa Ix, eaa,xaarN .
-IaYN! ~a~
T--ICaI LOT CNOta dtCTgN 1011 /ILL!
[n the eDaanaa of an approved soil engineering report these
provisions may ba waived for minor tills not intended to
support structures. •
(b). Ptll Location. Pill slopes shall not be constructed on
natursl slopes steeper then two to one (2:1) or where the
tilt slope toes out within I2 Me• n... •_~,...•.,,.. -_. .
lower existing or planned cut slopes except•in~tha~~cese of
slopes of minor height when approved by the Building
Official.
(c). Preparation of Ground. The ground surface shall be
prepared to receive fill Dy removing vegetation, noncomplying
fill, top-soil end other unsuitable materials, scarifying to
provide a bond with the new till, end, where slopes ere
steeper than five to one, end the height greater then 5 feet,
Dy benching into sound bedrock or other competent material as
determined by the soils engineer. The bench under the toe of
a till on s slope steeper then five to one shalt be et lees[
10 feet wide. The area beyond the toe of till shall be
sloped for sheet overflow or a paved drain shell be
provided. NTero till is to be pieced over a cut, the bench
under the toe of till shall be at least 10 feet wide but the
cut must be made before piecing fill end npproved Dy the
soils engineer end engineering geologist as a suitable
foundation for tilt.
(d). Fill Materiel. Detrimental amount of or genic material
shell not De permitted in [ilia. Except as permitted Dy the
Building Official, no rock or similar Irreducible material
with a maximum dimension greater then 12 inches shall De
buried or placed In tills. p
• In the absence of an approved soil engineering report these
provisions may be waived for minor tills not intended to
support structures.
(b). Fill Location. Fill
natural slopes steeper th
till slope toes oat within
lower existing or planned
slopes of minor height
Official.
slopes shell not be constructed on
sn two to one (2:1) or where the
12 feet horizontally of the top of
cut slopes except in the ease of
when spproved by the But !ding
(c1. Preparation of Ground. The ground surface shall be
prepared to receive fill Dy removing vegetation, noncampl ying
fill, top-soil and other unsui labia materials, scarifying to
provide a Dond with the new till, and, where slopes are
at ea per than five to one, and the height greater than 0 feet,
by benching into sound bedrock or other cd~etent material as
determined Dy the soils engineer. Tha bench under the toe of
• till on • slaps steeper than f[ve to one shall Da at Laaat
10 teat wide. Tha area beyond the toe of fill shall 6e
eloped for shpt overflow or a paved drain shall ba
provided. tyhera f[ll is to Da p1aNd over ^ dui, tM banah
under the toe of fill shall be at least 10 [eat wide but the
cut must Da made before piecing till and approved Dy the
soils engineer and engineering geologist as s suitable
• foundation for till.
(d). Fill Na!erial. Detrimental amount of or genie materiel
she R not De permitted in fills. Except as permitted by the
Building Official, no rock or similar irreducible material
with • m••:m.... nt.......:
buried or Gr°a:a. 1"•" ii inches snail De
placed in tills.
EXCEPTION: The Building Official may permit placement
of larger rock when the soils engineer properly devises
n method of placement, continuo ualy Inspects its
placement end approves the fill stability. The
following cond[tfons shall also applye
a) Prior to issuance of the Grading Permit, potential
rock disposal areas shall be delineated on the
grsdtng plan.
b) Roek siaas greater then 24^ in nuximum dimension
shell De 10 feet or more below grade measured
vertically.
c) Rocks shall be pieced so as to assure tilling of
ell voids with tines.
,~ (e). Compaction. All fills shall ba compacted ~o a minimum
of 90% of maximum density es determinsd Dy U.B.C. 9tsndard
No. 70-1. Piald density shall Da determined in accordance
with U.B.C. Standard No. 70-2 or equivalent ns approved Dy
the Building Official.
93
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Fills exempted elsewhere in this ordinance and •
where the Building Official determines that
campsotion is not a neeesssry snfety measure to aid
in preventing saturation, settlement, slipping, or
erosion o[ the till.
2. Where lower density end expensive types of soil
exist, permission for leaser campacti on may be
granted Dy the Building Official upon showing of
good cause under the oonditions provided herein.
3. All becktill in utility line trenches shall be
compacted and tested. The soils engineer shall
verity that th[s backfilling has been
satisfactorily accomplished. Alternate methods of
tilling end compaction may be utilized on speoitic
projeets when spacit[ed by the soil •nginur and/or
approved by the Building Official.
([). Slope. TM elope of fill surfaces shall b• no steeper
than is sate for the Intended use. Pill slopes shall Da no
steeper than two horizontal to one vertleal.
(g?. Drainage and Terracing. Dratnage and brracing shall
be provided end the area above till slopes •nd the surfaces •
of terraces shall De graded end paved as required by Section
T012.
15.12.280 Section 7013 Amended--Erosion Controls. Section
?013 o t e Appen x o t • n orm a ne ~,e .e !: ^; .e;
muu uueu w rasa as [ollowa:
Section 7013(a) Erosion Controls. The feces of cut and till
slopes shall be prepared and rttaintainsd to control against
erosion. The protection [or the slopes shall be installed as
soon ea practical and prioe to calling for final ^pproval.
(b) Other Devioes. Where necessary, check dams, cribbing,
riprap or other devisee or methods shalt be employed to
control erosion and provide snfety.
(c) Planting. TAe surface of nil cut end tilt slopes more
than fiv (S) feet in height shall De protected against
damage by erosion by planting with approved grass or ground
cover plants. Slopes a:ceeding fifteen (IS) feet in vertical
height shalt also be plnnted with shrubs end trees at
eyuivalent spacings, in eddi Lion to the grass or ground cover
plants. The plants and planting methods used shell be
suitable for the soil end climatic conditions of the site.
F.XCEPTION9: ~ •
1. Planting need not De provided toe cut slopes rooky
in character •nd not subject to damage by erosion,
when approved Dy thenBUilding Otfleial.
'7
• R. Slopes may be protected against erosion damage Dy
other methods when such methods have been
specifically recommended by a soils engineer,
enginaertng geologist, or equivalent, end found to
otter erosion protection equal to that provided by
the planting specified in this Section.
(d). Irrigation. Slopes required to be pleated shell be
provided with an approved system at irrigation designed to
cover all portion^ of the slope, and plans therefore shalt be
submitted and approved prior to instnllntion. A tunetional
teat of the system may De required. The requirements for
permanent Irrigation systems may be modified upon spaei[ia
recommendation of a landscape erchitaet or equivalent
authority that Deeaus• of the type of plants aeleated, the
planting methods used and the soil •nd climatic eonditiona et
the site, sash irrtgat[on ayatwo will not bs neeessary for
the maintenance of tM slops plant[ng.
(a) galeas• of good. TAa planting sad irr[gation systems
required by this 9setion shall be installed as soon as
practical after rough grading. Prior to final approval of
grading and before the relaas• of the grading Dond, the
pleating shall De well established end growing on the slopes.
• 9F.CI'[DN 7 A new Chapter 15.18 is hereby added to the
gancho~ueaisong• Municipal Cods to read in words and figures ss
follows:
. Chaoter 15.18
Mechanical Code
Sections:
15.18.010 Chapters 1, 2, 3, Deleted.
15.16.010 Cha tees 1 2 and 3 Deleted. Chapters 1, 2, and 0
at sa: Uni orm Mec an c• o e, 1 Lion ate Hereby deleted.
9s
SECTION 8 A new Chapter 15.20 is hereby added to the
Rancho~nga Municipal Code to reed in words and figures as
follows:
Chapter IS.20
Plumbin¢ Code
9eetionas
15.20.010 Part i Deleted--AAniniatration
15.20.020 9action 1004(x) Amandad--Mtteriats
15.20.030 Appendix 9action D1(b)--Deleted
15.20.040 Appendix Section D3.4--Deleted
15.20.010 Part I Dalated. Part I of said Uniform Plumbing
Code, 19 Ed t on, en tla Amlotatrati on" is hereby deleted in
tie entirety.
15.20.020 Section 1004(x) Miendad--OYter(als. 8•ction
1004 • o sa n orm ng o • ss eTT>y~im•ndad to read
as follows:
9action 1004(x) Meterlals. water pipe and fittings shall be
of bras, copper, east iron, galvanised steal, land or other
approved materials.
Asbestos-cement, PE, or PVC water pipe manufactured to •
recognised standards may ba used for cold avatar distribution
systems outside • building. All materials us ad in the water
supply system, except valves and similar devices, shall ba of
~, -j.t r.. -. ...w -. Gt.~r.,.- rj
Administrative Authority.
15.20.030 Appendix 9action DI b Deleted. Section D1(D) of
Appe~i~t-sa: n orm ng oC~~ is Tiereby deleted.
15.20.040 endix Section DS.4 Deleted. Section D3.4 of
Appendix D o said n orm umD ng o • a hereby deleted.
9G
SECTION 9. Anew Chapter 15.24 is hereby added to the Rancho
• Cucamonga Mun
[oilowa: icipal Code to read, in words and figures, es
Chapter 15.24
Electrical Code
Sections:
15.24.010 Chapter 2 Amended - Deletions
15.24.020 Chapter 3 Amended - Deletions
15.24.030 Article 90 Amended - Introduction
15.24.040 Section 210-52 Amended - Basement
Receptacle Outlets
15.24.050 9eation 210-54 Added - Buildings
Accessory to Dwelling Units.
15.24.080 Section 210-SB Added - Equipment Room Receptacles
15.24.070 Section 210-58 Added - Built-in Gsa Ovena.
15.24.080 Section 210-70 Amended - Lighting outlets
required.
15.24.090 Section 210-70(c) Added -
Buildings Accessory to Dwelling Units.
15.24.100 Section 220-10(a) Amended - Ampacity and
Computed Loads.
15.24.110 Section 290-43 Amended - Wiring Methods for 800
Volts or Less.
• 15.24.120 Section 230-70(e) Amended - Service Equppment--
Disconnecting Means Location.
15.24.130 Section 230-212 Added - Service Equipment
Capacity.
15.24.140 Section 300-15(a) Added - Spare Raceways.
15.'14.150 Section 310-14 Amended - Aluminum Conductor
Use Restricted
15.24.160 Section 320-3 Amended - Open Wiring on Insulators
--Uses Permitted.
15.24.170 Section 320-15 Deleted
15.24.180 Section 338-3(D) Amended -- Type NMC Cable
15.24.190 Section 338-4(c) Amended - Uaes Not Permitted
15.24.200 Section 338-2 Deleted.
15.24.210 Section 350-5 Amended - Plexible Metal Conduit
Use for Grounding.
15.24.220 Section 370-8(d) Added - Box Construction
Non combuatibie Materials Required
15.24.230 Articles 550 and 551 Deleted.
15,24.010 Chapter 2 Amended -- Deletions. Chapter 2 of said
National Elect rical Code is hereby emended Dy deletion of
sections 201(a) , 201(c), 203 and 204.
15.24.020 Chapter 3 Amended -- Deletions. Chapter 3 of said
National Elect rical Code is hereby emended by deletion of
sections 302(al , 302(b ), 302(c), 303(x), 303(d), 304(x), 304(b),
304(c), 304(d), 304(e), Table No. 3-A, 305(e) and 308(x).
9~
13.24.030 Article 90 Amended -- Introduction. Article 90 of •
the National ectrical Code ,s hereby amended to rend as
follows:
90-1 Title. This code shall 6e known as the Electrical
Code. Whenever the work "code" is used in this chnpter is
shall mean the Electrical Code of the City of Rancho
Cucemong s.
90-2 Scope. The provisions of thin code and the Duilding
atnndards contained herein, shall apply to the construction,
alteration, moving, demolition, repair and use of all
electrical equipment, wiring end systems in or on anp
building or structure or outdoors on any premises or
property; except for such eleeiricai equipment, wiring and
systems which are ezprasaly exempted by Section 90-3.
80-3 Examptiona. This coda does not cover:
a) installations in ships, water erafL other than
floating dwalt[ng units, railway rolling stook,
aircraft, automotive vehicles, cammarclet coaches,
mobIlahomaa •nd recreational vahlalas.
b) Installations underground in mines, mine shafts end
connate. •
e) Installations of railways for generation,
transformation, transmission, or diatriDution of
power used exctusively for operation of rolling
atoek or inatsllationa used exaluaivaly for
.,-
d) Instsllation of communication equ[pmant under the
exclusive control of communication utilities,
located outdoors or In building spaces used
exclusively for such instaliatlona.
e) Installations under the a:elusive control of
eleetrleal u4ilitiea [or the purpose of
communication, or metering; or for the generation,
control transformation, transmission, enA
distriDutlon of electrical energy located in
buildings used exclusively by utilities for such
purposes or located outdoors on property owned or
leered by the utility or on public highways,
streets roads, etc, or outdoors by established
rights on private property.
C1
9g
EXCEPTION to (d) and (e): [n places of employment,
• the following shall apply: Installations of
conductors, equipment and associated enclosures
subject to the jurisdiction of the California
Publfc Utilities Commission, that are owned,
operated and maintained by an electric,
communications or electric railway utility, Dut not
including conduit, vaults, and similar enclosures
containing conductors end equipment of such a
utility wAen located indoors or on premises not
used exclusively for utility purposes, except for
the utility's conductors and equipment therein.
t) installations on nighwnys or bridges.
90-4 Enforcement. This code shell be enforced by the
Building Otfiolel as provided for in Section 15.08.020 of
tnis lion.
90-5 Interpretations. Interpretations of this code shall be
made by the Building Official as provided for In Section
18.08.020 of this title.
90-8 Annual ma[ntenance permit. Any person, firm or
corporation regularly employing one or more qualified
electrlcsl maintenance electricians may make epplicstion for
. and obtain an annual electrical maintenance permit. Pees [or
such permit shell be as set fortA by City Council
resolution. Each annual elactr(cai maintenance permit shall
be valid tot the year during which Issued. Prior to Jenuery
18tH of eacA year, annual malntenance permits shall be
renewed.
Work authorized by an annual maintenance permit shell be
limited to installations, alterations, extensions end
maintenance of electrical wiring end equipment in or on
existing buildings.
90-7 Monthly maintenance records. Any person, firm or
corporation having obtained an annual maintenance permit
shall keep a record of all electrical equipment installed
under such permit and the Building Official shall have access
to such records.
Within fifteen (15) days following the end of each quarter-
year, the person, firm or corporation to which such annual
maintenance permit was issued shall transmit to the Building
Official a quarterly report o[ all electrical work done
during the preceding quarter end shall obtain a permit for
such work.. Fees for quarterly permits for such work shell De
those set forth for otAer electrlcsl permits except there
shell be no Issuance tee charged.
~~
90-8 Qualification o[ Maintenance Electricians. Every person
applying for qualification as maintenance electrician shell •
pay a tee, as set by resolution of the City Council, for
examination and qualification, and by successfully passing an
examination given Dy the Building Official, relative to
electrical woe k. Any person tailing to pass the examination
may re-apply toe qualification after a period of 90 days has
lapsed end upon payment of a new examination tee.
In lieu of examination, pose ession of a State Eleatricnl
Contractors license or proof of qualification by another
goverronental agency neceptable to the Building Official may
be considered ea meeting the requirements of this eeation.
Waiver of examination shall not be considered •s waiver of
any tee required by this seati on. Each annual maintenance
electrician qusl[tlcation shall expire on DscemDer Slat of
each year and shall bs renewed within thirty (SO) days
thereafter upon payment of an annual re newel tee as sat by
resolution of the City Counail.
90-9 Approved Materials. All electrical materials, equipment
end •pplianeas shall De approved by the Building Official for
use or method of Installation prior to utillsatlon within the
scope of this Coda. Listing or labeling as oon[oeming to the
standards of Underwriters Laboratorlss, Inc., the United
States Bureau of Mines, the American Standards Awoalatlon,
the United Stated Bureau of Standards, or other similar •
institution of recognised standing, shall De prima facie
evidence of aonformi ty with approved standards of safety to
life end property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nny
material, method of installation, or equipment, the use of
which, in the written opinion of the Bu1lAina Clffin:.l .,....~iw
conat,tute en unreasonable hasard to fife or safety may be
disappproved by the 8ullding Official.
eeC[tOn 'L1U-S'Ll[1 0[ t
emended to read as tollowsi
Section 210-52(t). Basements. Foe a one-family dwelling at
leant one receptacle outlet In addition to any provided for
laundry equipment shell be installed In each basement. See
Sections 210-8(a)(2).
.cs.uou sec n on aiu-a• oases nu,:a,n s
noses. he at(ona lectr as o e ,s m
on of s new Seetlon 210-54 to read as toltows:
U
/~
• Section 210-54(e) Buildings accessory to multiple dwelling
uses. Garages and carports accessory to multiple dwelling
us¢s shell be provided with at least one receptacle. Garages
or carports designed for use by more than one dwelling unit
shall be provided with at least one receptacle [or each four
(4) parking spaces or traction thereof.
Where such garages ar carports are separated by walls or
partitions so as to form individual areas serving individual
dwelling units, at least one receptacle shall be provided in
each Individual area.
Separated areas shall De wired either on individual dwelling
unit meters or on fl house meter or meters.
Receptacles provided in common-use gereges or carports shall
be energized from n house meter or meters. When energized
tram a house meter or meters, the number o[ receptacles per
circuit shell not a:ceed six and no such c(rcult shall supply
any other outlets.
Wiring to all new or reconstructed, detached accessory
buildings shall De installed underground in conduit approved
for the purpose. gee also Section 210-8(2).
• (b) Buildings accessory to single femi ly dwelling uses.
Carports end gereges, accessory to single femity dwellings or
duplexes, shell De wired with a minimum of one grounding type
receptacle on n separate 20 amp circuit. Additional
receptacle outlets, not exceedinv s, ^~l' bt ;,,, ieiiea on [he
(c) Detached garages or carports. Wiring to all new or
reconstructed detached garages or carports serving
residential uses shall be installed underground in minimum
3/4" raceway [rem the distribution panel.
laundry receptacles as required by Section 210-521f) shall
not be construed as meeting the minimum garage or carport
receptacles required Dy this section.
15.24,080 Section 210-58 Added E ui meat Room
Receptacles. T e National Electrical Coe is emended by adding
Section 210-58 to read as follows:
Section 2i0-58. Equipment room receptacles. A receptacle
outlet shaLL be provided in ell equipment rooms, attics and
underfloor areas where equipnent is installed to provide a
power source for repairs.
,'~ 15.24.010 Section 210-88 Added -- Built-in Ces Ovens. The
Yationel tectrieel Code is hereby amends adding Section 210-58
to reed es follows: /
/~/
Section 210-58. Built-In gas ovens. A receptacle outlet •
shall be installed to serve each built-in gas oven. The
outlet shall be located so that it is accessible without
removing the oven. Thta outlet may be installed on the
lighting circuit.
------ ----•-•• --~-... n11R 1:YCY -- LI nun outlets
ure eat wn 1 - o the at one lectr ea o e is
tby emended to read sa follows:
Section 210-70(a). Dwelling units. At lens[ one well
switch-controlled lighting outlet shall De installed in every
habitable room= in bathrooms, utility rooms, basement,
hallways, stairways, garages end at outdoor entrances.
At least one lighting outlet shall be installed in each
stile, or undartloor space used for storage or containing
equipment requiring serv[e[ng.
Saeeptlon No 1: In habitable rooms, other than
kitchens, one or more reoeptaelsa controlled Dy • wall
switch shall be permitted in lieu of lighting outlets.
6aeption No. 2s In Aallwaya, stairways •nd at outdoor
entrsneaa remote, central or automatic control of •
lighting is permitted.
- - - c, nuuau Dull
is. s •t onal leetrleal o e
c::o,i ::Y""-iu(Yi io re as es follows:
Section 210-TO(c). Buildings secess Dry to dwelling units.
Garages or csrpor is accessory to dwelling units shell be
wired with a minimlo:: of one switched light outlet.
Garages or carports designed for use by more then one
dwelling unit shall have et least one light outlet for each
tour (~) perking spaces or traction thereof.
Where garages or carports are separated by walls or
partitions so as to form individual areas serv(ng individual
dwelling unl ts, at lcnst one switched lighting outlet shall
De provided In each individual area.
Separated areas shall be wired on individual dwelling unit
meters or on a house meter or meters.
Lighting outlets provided in common-use cress shall be
energised from a Douse meter or meters.
Wiring to ell new or re-o onatruoted detsched accessory •
buildings shell be installed underground in conduit spproved
for the purpose.
~D~
• 15.24.100 Section 220-10(a) Amended -- Ampecity and Computed
Loads. ect:on ~ a o [De at:ona ectr:cal o e :s
hereby emended to rend as follows:
x20-10 (a) Ampacity end computed loads. Peeder conductors
shall have sufficient ampecity to supply the load served. In
no case shell the computed load of a feeder be less then the
sum of the loads on the Drench circu[ts supplied as
determined by Pert A of this Article otter any eppliceble
demand [actors permitted by Pnrta B, C or D have been applied
nor less then 50 amperes empaaity, whichever is greeter.
.~.:+.aiv sec n en asv-+s nmenpep -- w:n n metnops :or euu
Volts or less, action - o t e at:ona ectr cal Co a is
Dereby amended to read es follows:
Section 290-49. Wiring methods for 600 volts or less.
Service entrance conductors shall be installed In accordance
wtth the eppliceble requirements of this code eovaring the
type of wiring method used end llmitad to the following
methods:
1. Rigid Metal Conduit
Exception No. 1 Aluminum conduit shell not be
used for overhead service entrance raceway.
Exeption No. 2 Aluminum conduit shall not be
used for underground service raceway.
2. Electrical Metallic Tubing
Exception No. 1 Electrical metallic tubing shall
not De used where supporting or Intended to
support service drop attechmenta.
Except(on No. 2 Electrical metallic tubing
shall not be used ns underground service
entrance raceway.
3. Wirexeys.
4. Busweys.
S. Auxi 1!ary gutters.
0. Rigid Non-Metallic Conduit.
Exception No. 3 Rtgid non-metnilia conduit shell
not be used for overhead service entrsnc; faceway.
7. Cablebus.
/03
8. Mineral Insulated Metal-Sheathed CeDle.
(a) Amended -- Service Euu(plment •
Sec~'~$S 2 o as d atsonel
ed to rend as follows:
Section 230-70(d) Location. The service disconnecting means
shall be located on the exterior of the 6ullding st the
nesreat safe end readily accessible point to where the
service connectors enter the building.
Exception No. 1: fM buildings of a commercial or
industrial tppa that are ner:nalty upon during en
average business day the service switch, feeder and/er
ouster may Da installed within the Duilding It meeting
the requlramants of the service util[ty. Service
diseonnecta, where permitted inside a Duilding, shall
be located In a space, readily aceesalble, sad nearest
the point of entry of the service conductors into the
Duilding as possible.
lion Y30-214 to read as follows:
Section 230-212 Service equipment capacity. Servlce
equipment capacity shall Da a^ tollowas
1) Servlce equipment installed to serve single family
dwellings shall hav a eapaof tp of not less than 20
single pole overcurrant protective devices in
addition to a main aw[teh or circuit breaker.
J OI~IV< VVIIVYI•
~1~ islo tail i~ u~.tu~~~.Ai
dwelling units shall •be not~leas then 1 1/2^ sire
conduit.
2) Servlce equipment installed to serve aammerciel or
industrial buildings shall have an ampaof ty rating
to aeeva the Intended load Dut not less then 80
amperes. Service conduit or feeder raceways shell
not De less than 1" size except that where aerviee
conduit or feeder raceway is concealed, the min[mum
size raceway shall be 1-1/4".
3) Peedern nerving individual unite of multi-family
dwellings shell be installed in not leas then 1"
size conduit and run from the meter location to a
distribution panel within each unit.
15.24,140 Section 300-t5(c) Added -- 9 era Aaeewn a, TAe
National lectrical o e s here y amen a Dy s ng act on 300-
13(c) to reed as follows:
•
/~
• Section 300-15(c) Spare raceways. For attached or detached
stngle family dwellings, two (2) three-quarter inch (3/4")
spare raceways for future use shall be provided for each
dwelling unit, one running from the penelboerd to an
accessible location in the attic and one to en accessible
location under the floor. Where either space is not
available because of method of construction, such termination
of spare raceways shall be as approved by the Building
Official.
uueu
e at:onel lectr:cal Coy
ton 310-19 to read as follows:
310-14 Aluminum conductors. (e) Material. Solid aluminum
conductors, No. 8, 10 end 12 AWG, shall De made of an M-800
series etectricnl grade aluminum alloy conductor materiel.
Stranded eluminuo conductors, No. 8 ANtG through 1000 MCM,
marked es type XflfiW, TF3W, THWN, THFITI, service entrsnce type
SE, Style V, and SE, Style R, shall be msde of en M-800
aeries etectricnl grade etuminum alloy conductor mater[al.
(b) Use restricted. Aluminum conductors smeller than No. 8
shall not De used for circuit conductors, feeders or
sub[eeders, unless installed under full-t[me inspection by a
• Special Inspector as a "special case" outlined in Section
308(a)12 of the Uniform Adminisirntive Code as adopted in
Chapter 15.08 0[ this Title.
1.5.24.180 Section 320-3 amended -- Ooen Wiring on Insulators
ro:uu <<eu. aecr:on szu-3 0[ the National Electrical Code
is whereby amended to read as follows:
Section 320-3 Uses permitted. Open wiring on insulators
shall be permitted on systems of 600 volts, nominal, or less
for industrial or agrfculturel establishments in outdoor
locations only.
15.24.170 Section 320-15 Deleted. Section 320-15 of the
National Electrical Code s hereby deleted.
I5.24.1g0 Section 338-3(6) Amended T'~ a NMC Cable.
Section 338- b is hereby amended to read ea of ows:
Section 336-3(b). Type NMC. Type NMC cable shall be
pe r~~~i LteG: (1} for concealed work in dry, moist, damp or
corrosive locations; (2) in outside and inside wells of
masonry block or tile; (3) in a shallow chose in masonry,
concrete or adobe and covered with plaster, adobe, or similar
finish, where embedded in plaster or runs in a shallow chase
.~ in masonry wells and covered, NMC cable shall b¢ protected
against damage from nails by a cover of corrosion-resistant
steel at least t/1B" in thlekness.
/ ~~
15.24.190 Section 338-4 Amended -- Usea Not Permitted. •
Subsection (c) o Section 3 8 o the National Electrical Code
is hereby emended to reed as follows:
Section 336-4. Uses not permitted. (a) Type NM or NMC.
Types NM and NMC cables shall not be used: (1) in any
dwelling structure exceeding three stories above grade; (2)
as service-entrance cable; in any commercial or induatr(al
building; (3) in any haaardo us location; (4) in hoistweys;
(5) (n unencloaed locations of private garages or carports;
(8) in aoeessiDle locations of dwelling units other then
circuits or portions of circuits locsted within and serving
en ind[vidual dwelling unit; (T) in say area where exposed to
mechanical damage or the elements; (8) in underfloor crawl
spaces; (9) embedded in poured cement, concrete or eggregste.
(b) Type NM. Type NM cable shall not ba installed: (1)
where a:posed to corrosive fumes or vapors; (2) where
embedded in masonry, concrete, adobe, till, or plaster; (3)
in ^ shallow chase In masonry, concrete, or adobe and covered
with plaster, adobe, or slmilsr ti n[sh.
15.24.200 Section 330-2 Deleted. Section 338-2 of the
Nstiona ectr ca o e s ereDy a sled.
15.24.210 Section 3S0-S Amended -- Ple:ible Metal Conduit •
Used ns roan in ~ sans. ectton - o the National
Electrtesl Coe s ere y emended to read ss follows:
SeC[IOn 350-5 QrnunAina vt..__t wt.. ...-_~..,
e irdii i,a
permitted as a grounding means where both they conduit end
[i ttinga are approved [or grounding. Where an equipment
bonding jumper is required around flexible metal conduit, it
shall be installed in accordance with Section 250-79.
Exception No. 1 Plexlble instal conduit shall De permitted es n
grounding mesas tf tiro total length in any ground
return path is 8 feet (1.@3 m) or less, the
conduit is terminated In fittings spproved for
grounding, end the circuit conductors contained
therein ere protected by overcurrent devices
rated at 20 amperes or less.
Exception No. 2 [n dwelling units and in buf ldings accessory to
dwellings, flexible metal conduit may be used for
grounding means by the use of fltt[nga which
thread into the convolutions of square-cut
flexible conduit.
15.24.220 Section 3T0-8 d) Added -- Box Co struction
-Noncombust ble ter als e u re act on - o the •
etionel ectr cal o e s ere y amended by adding subsection
(d) as follows:
/O~
Section 370-8(d). Box construction. Boxes used in walls
• required to be of fire-resistive construction shall be of
metal or other approved inconibustlble meterlals.
15.24.230 Articles SSO and 551 Deleted. Articles SSO end
551 o the National ectr~cal Co a are hereby deleted.
•
~J
f
SECTION 10.
Rancho A new Chapter 15.28 is hereby sdded to the
ucamong
follows: a Municipal Code, to reed in words and figures, es •
Chanter 15.28
CODE POB ABATEMBNf OP OMNf)ERO1J3 BUILDINGS
3ectlons•
13.28.010 Section 103 deleted
15.28.020 Section 201(e) deleted
15.28.030 Section 203 deleted--Vt olntions end penalties.
15.28.040 Section 203 emended--Board of appeals.
15.28.050 Section^ R08 ndded-Sum:ary abatement.
15.28.080 Seotion 801 amended--Demolition procedure.
15.28.070 9eetion 802 deleted.
15.28.080 Seotion 901 amended--Expanses inourred by city in
repair or demol Rion.
15.28.090 9eetion 802 uaandad--Council ruling.
15.28.100 Section 903 amended--OD)ections.
15.28.110 Section 804 amended--Passage.
15.28.010 Section 103 Deleted. Seetlon 103 of sa[d Uniform
Code or atema nt o angerou• u Idinga is hereby deleted.
15.28.020 Section 201(0) Deleted. Subsect[on (o) of Seotion
201 of ea Un: •
orm ode or Abatement of Dangerous Buildings to
hereby deleted.
Buildings is hereby emended by deleting Section 205 in its
entirety.
15.28.040 Section 205 Amended--Boned of role. 9eetion
205 o the Un orm o e oe ADetement o Dangaroua uildinga to
amended to reed as follows.
9eetion 205. "Board of Appeals" ea used herein shell mean
the Board of Appeala es set forth in Seotion 204 of the
Uniform Administrative Code heeeDy ndopted.
Appeala to the board shall De peoeessed in accordance with
the provisions contained in 9eetion 501 of thfa code.
13.28.050 Seetiona 208 Added--Sumnnr Abatement. The
Uniform Code or A atement o engeroue u 1 nga a emended by
adding Sections 208 end 207 to read as follows:
•
~D 0
Section 206(e ). Summery abatement. [n addition to the
procedures provided for abatement o[ dangerous buildings es
set forth in Chapter 4 of this Code, the Building Official is
• hereby given summary power to secure from entry any structure
or premises which in his discretion he determines to be
immediately dangerous, or immediately hazardous or in other
manner injurious to public health or safety. Such structures
may be secured by the Building Official by nailing of Doards
over the doors and windows o[ such structure, however, he
shalt not be limited to only this method end may use other
methods at his discretion to accomplish the same purpose
which may be more appropriate under the circumstances. The
Building Official sbnli also post a sign stating in effect
"DANGEROUS BUI LDINO, DO NOT ENTER": ar other appropriate
sign upon the structure or premises in nt lesst one
conspicuous place. The Building Official shall immediately
upon such action send notice to the owners of the real
property upon whicb the structure or condition is located, as
shown on the last equalised assessment rolls. Such notice
shall contain the following information:
1. That he bas secured the structure or corrected the
hazardous conditions.
2. The cost incurred by the City thereby.
9. Thst he has posted signs ss provided by this section.
. 4. The reasons why he has taken the action.
5. That en appeal may De made within ten (10) days to the
City Council, es provided to this Section.
•• '";at if uie auiiun is no[ annulled by the City Coundil,
the coat of securing the property shell became a lien
upon the reel property, unless [he coat is paid to the
City within thirty (30) days o[ the mailing of the
notice. [f any owner of property, or say person having
any interest in property effected by the notion of the
Building Official in securing a structure or abating a
hazardous condition as permitted by this section, is
aggrieved by the action of the Building Official in
securing the structure, such person or persons may
appeal the action of the Building Official by tiling a
written notice of appeal with the Ctty Clerk within ten
(10) days after receipt of notice o[ tAe action by the
Building Official. The notice of appeal must be
verified under oath or under penalty of perjury and
must ;Cate the grounds upon which the eotlon of the
Building Official is appealed. The City Council Shall,
upon receiving such notice of appeal, hear anq evidence
or other relevant matters presented by the appellant or
the Building Official et its next regular meeting after
•~ the filing of the notice of eppeat, provided however,
/D ~1
if the notice of appeal is filed less than ten de ys •
prior to the day of a regular meeting of the City
Council, the hearing shell not ba held et the first
regular meeting, but et the foliowing regular
meeting. After hearing all evidence and other relevant
matters presented at said hearing or without hearing if
no appeal 'rs made upon the report of the Building
Official, the C[ty Council may then confirm, amend, or
annul the action of the Building Official. It the
ect[on of the Buildtng Official is annulled, the City,
at its own expense, shell remove any and all
instruments used to secure said structure, and shall
remove any and alt signs stating that the building is
unsafe to enter. It, however, the City Council
confirms the action of the Building Official in
securing the structure nt the hearing on appeal, or, if
no appeal is taken, st any other regular meeting, or
adjourned meeting, then the cost incurred by the City
in securing the structure shall became a lien against
the property, end n resolution of the City Council
confirming the cation of the Building Official,
including the impoaf lion of a lien upon the property
upon which the structure Is located to pay for the cost
of securing it, may De adopted upon receipt of s report
from the Building Ottia[al. Such resolution may ba
filed with the San Bernardino County Taz Assessor, end •
the 1[sn imposed thereby may be aolleated for the City
by him, along with the next annual taz levy and
assessment on said property.
(s) The same procedure, es provided in subsection (el
for abating through aecur[ng from entry any structure
which is determined by the Building Ot[iotet to be
immediately dangerous or immediately hazardous may also
be used Dy the Building Official in connection with the
summery abatement of all other dangerous or hazardous
conditions upon private property which the Building
Official determines, nt hie discretion, es constituting
en immediately dangerous or ha aerdous condition. The
Building Official may then summarily abate such
nuisance, et his discretion, in the most appropriate
manner under the circumstances, whi eh may [nclude, but
shall not be limited to the following methods:
fencing, draining water from swimming pools end filling
with appropriate ballast, removing fire hazards,
tilling or covering open holes and grading or
strengthening land tills or a:cevations. Although the
manner and method used by the Building Official shall
be at his discretion, he shell, in making his
determinations, seek the most eaonomicat method end
endeavor not to place en undue economical hardship upon
the owner of the property, and only use those measures •
which will eliminate the dangerous end hazardous
features.
/~~
15.28.060 Section 801 amended Demolition Procedure.
. Section 801 o the Un orm Code or Abatement o Dangerous
Buildings is hereby emended to reed es follows:
Section 801. Procedure. When any work of repair or
demolition is to be done pursuant to Section 701 (ej 3 of [his
Code, tAe Building O'f iciel shall issue the order therefore
and the work shall be accomplished by Ci[y personnel or by
private contract under the direction of the Building
Official, or he may employ such architectural end engineering
assistance on a contract basis as he may deem reasonably
necessary. If any part of the work is to be accomplished by
private contract, stendsrd public works contractual
procedures shall be followed.
15.28.070 Section 802 Deleted. The Uniform Code [or
Abatement o Dangerousa uild~hereby amended Dy deleting
Section 802 in its entirety.
Abatement o pengeroua Buildings is hereby emended to reed ea
follows:
Section 901. The Building Official shall keep an Itemized
account of the expense incurred by the City in the repair or
demolition of any building done pursuant to the provisions of
• Section 701 (c) 3 of tA1s Code. Upon the completion o[ the
work of repair or demolition, the Building Official shell
prepare and file with the City CIerK a report specifying the
work done, the itemized end total coat of the work, a
description of the real property noon wni~n t^.^ ~;:ild;,-,g ~,
t. u~iure is or was located, and the names end addresses of
[he persons entitled to notice pursuant to 9ubsecti on (c) of
Section 401.
15.28.090 Section 902 Amended--Council Rulin Section 902
o[ the Uni orm Code or the Abatement o Dangerous Buildings is
herebv amended to read as follows:
Section 902. Upon receipt of said report, the C[ty Clerk
shell present it to the City Council for cons ideretion. The
City Council shall fix a time, date and place for hearing
such report, and any protests or objections thereto. The
City Clerk shell cause notice o[ said hearing to be posted
upon the property involved, posted ea directed Dy tAe City
Council so as to give proper publie notice„ and served Dy
certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the owner o[
the property es his name end address appears on the lest
equalized assessment roll of the county, I[ such se appears,
or es known [o the Clerk. Such notice shell be given et
least ten (10) days prior to the date set for hearing end
shell specify the day, hour, and place when the Council will
hear and pass upon the Building Official's report,together
/~ /
with any objections or protest which may be filed as •
hereinafter provided by any person interested in oe effected
by the proposed charges.
15.28.100 Section 903 Amended--Obleetions. Section 903 of
the Uniform Code or the at anent o angarous Buildings is
hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 903. My person interested in or etteoted by the
proposed charges may file written protests or objeetiona with
the City Clerk •t nny time prior to the time set for the
hearing on the report of the Building Official. Bach such
protest or objection must contain a de eerlption of the
property in which the signer thereof is interested end the
grounds of such protest or objection the date it was received
Dy Aim. Ha shall present such protests or objections to the
City Counailet the time set for the hearing, end no other
protests or objaations shall Da considered.
15.49.110 9eotion 904 Amended--Pease •. Station 904 of the
Uniform o • or t • atement o angarous Buildings is hereby
emended to read a follows:
9eation 904. Upon the day and hour fixed for the hearing the
City Council shall hear and past upon 4ha report of the
Building Official together with any such objections or •
protests. The Council msq make such revision, eorraetfon or
modtfiaatlon to the report or the aheega as iL may loam just;
end when the Council [s satisfied with the aorreetnau of the
charge, the report (ss submitted or •a revised, corrected or
modified) together with the cheeses shell be confirmed or
rejected. The decision of the City Council on the report end
the charge, and on all protests or objeetiona, shall be final
and conclusive.
r1
U
//~
SECCIOH 11. A new ChepCer 15.32 is hereby added to
• the Ranoho Cucamonga Municipal Code, to read in words and
figures, ea follows:
CHAPTER 15.92
FpUS I I4G CODE
Sections:
15.32.010 Section 104 deleted
15.32.020 Section 201 suDSeotion (a) and (b) deleted.
15.32.030 Section 203 emended -- Housing advisory and
appeals Board
15.32.040 Section 204 deleted -- Violations and penalties
15.92.010 Seetion 104 deleted. Section 104 of said Unttorm
Houetng ode s •raDy a ate .
15.32.020 Seaton 201 9uDs action a1 and b) deleted.
Subseot ons s an~'f'6~' oZJ~eeiion ~seP3~t orm ous~g
Code nre hereby deleted.
• board. Section 203- of said Uniform Housing Code is
emceed to read ns follows:
Section 203. "Houetng Advisory end Appeals Board" sa used
Derain shall mean the Board of Aooesls .• ..+ !or!.".
3eu lion sue or the Unttorm Administrative Code hereby
adopted. Appeals to the Donrd shell be processed In
accordance with the provisions eonteined in Section 1201 of
this code.
Seetion 15.32.040 deleted. Seetion 204 of the Uniform
Houstng Code is ereby a ate .
/~~
SECT [ON 12. A new Chapter 15.36 is hereby added to the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, to read in words and figures, as
tollowa: •
Chapter 13.38
Sixn Code
9ections•
15.38.010 Section 103(d) deleted
15.38.020 Section 303 emended--Sign permits: Exemptions
15.38.030 Chapters S through 12 and Chapter 14 deleted
15.38.010 Section 103 Deleted. Said Uniform Sign Code is
amen ed by cl ef ng •et on 1 n its entirety.
15.38.020 9eation 303 Amended--Sl n Permits Hz lions.
Sect on o as n orm gn o • s amen a to raa as
tollowa:
Section 303. The following work shall not requlr• • sign
permit, however, thss• e:amption• shall not Da construed a^
relieving the owner of tM sign tram tM responsibility foe
its •rection end maintenanaa, canpliance with the prov[siona
of this Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, or any
other law or ord[nanee regulating the aamei
1. Tha changing of the advertising copy or message on a •
painted or printed sign or replacement of plastic sign
[aces.
.. ,.. ... ::. ae:~:::~:~~k
structure provided no structural chsnge is made.
3. Signs less than S feet sDove grade that ate not
electrically lighted.
4. Changing of theater marquees and similne signs
specifically designed for the use of replaceable copy.
Any permit Issued for erection of a sign in violstion of this
Code or other ordinance is automatically void end shall be
cancelled Dy the Building Official.
15.38.030 Cha tern 5 throw h 12 and Cha ter 14 Deleted. Ssid
Uniform Sign Code a hereby emended Dy deleting apters , 8, 7,
8, 9, to, il, i2, and 14 in their entireties.
•
r~~
SECTION 13. A new Chapter 15.40 is hereby added to the
• Rencho~a Municipal Code, to read in words and figures, as
follows:
CHAPTER 15.40
BUILDING SECURITY CODE
Sections:
Section 15.40.010 9eation 4101 emended -- Purpose.
Section 15.40.020 Section 4302 -- Application.
Section 15.40.030 Section 4105 amended -- Door viewers.
Section 15.40.040 Section 4108 emended -- Doors and
hsrdware.
Section 15.40.050 Section 4107 emended -- Sliding doors.
Section 15.40.080 Section 4108 emended -- Windows
Section 15.40.070 Section 4108 amended -- Garage vehicular
aaceea soots.
Section 15.40.080 9eation 4110 through 4115 sdded --
Mult[ple-family developments.
Section 15.40.010 Seatlon 4101 Amended -- Pur oae. Section
4101 o se: n orm u I ng eeur:ty o e :a smen a to reed ea
follows:
• Section 4101. Purpose. Tha purpose of this code is to
establish minimum atendsrds to make nexly eonatruc red
dwelling units and additions to dwelling units, end private
gsreges resistant to urtlnwful entry and to fecilitnte
protection of property.
Section 15.40.020 Sectfon 4102 -- A lication. Section 4102
o[ sai Uni orm Build ng ecurity ode is emended to rend as
follows:
Section 4102. Application. The provisions oP this chapter
shall apply to openings into dwelling units of Group A,
Division 1 Occupancies, Group R, Division 3 Occupancies and
into garages of Group M-1 Occupancies, as defined in the
Uniform Building Coda, including openings between attached
garages and dwelling units.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. An opening in an exterior wall when all portions oY
such openings ere more then 12 feet vertleelly or 8
feet horizontally from en eacessiDie surface of any
adjoining yard, court, passageway, public way,
breezeaay, patio, planter, porch or slmilsr area.
/~S
2. An opening in en exterior well when ell portions of
such openinga are more then 12 feet vertically or B •
feet horizontally from the surface of any adjoining
root, balcony, lending, stair tread, platform or
similar structure or when any portion of such
surface is itself more then 12 feet above en
accessible surface.
3. Openings where the smaller dimension is 8 inches or
less, pr~ivided that the closest edge of such
openinga is nt least 40 inches from the locking
device of the door or window assembly.
4. Openings protected by acquired fire door assemblies
having ^ fire endurance rating of not lass than 45
minutes.
15.40.030 Section 4103 amended -- Door Vlew~rs. Section
4105 o sal ni orm u ng ecur ty o a s emeo a to read as
follows:
Section 4103. A11 main or front entry doors to dwelling
units shall be arranged so that the occupant hu • claw of
the area immediately outside the door without opening the
door. E:cept as provided in Section SSOS (h) of th• Dnitorm
Building Code, such view may be provided Dy • door viewer
having a field of view of not less than 180 degrees, through •
windows or through view ports.
15.40.040 Section 4106 emended -- Doors end Hardware.
Section 1 o t e n orm uil ng ecur ty o e s omen a to
~cau nn lullOwe:
Section 4108 (a). Doors end Hardware. Swinging pedestr[en
doors and their hardware regulated by this chapter shall
comply with [JBC 9Tendard No. 41-1, Part I or equivalent
standard. Doors and hnrdwere shall be installed as tested.
EXCEPTIONS:
Doors end hardware febrionted end installed es set
forth in Subsections (b) through (i) Delow.
(b ). poor construction. Such doors shell be of solid
construction witA a minimum thickness of one end three-
quyerters inches (1-3/4") except !or recessed panels whseh
may De not Tess thin nine-sixteenths inched (0/IB")
thickness.
/~ /
(c). Locking devices. Such doors shall be equipped with a
• double or single cyclinder deedbol[ lock. The bolt she p
have a minimum projection of one inch (1^) and be conatructed
so es to repel cutting tool attack. TAe deadbolt shall have
an embedment of et least three-fourths inch (3/4") into the
strike receiving the projected bolt. The cyclinder shall
have a cylinder guard, a minimum of five (5) pin tumblers,
and shall De connected to the inner portion of the back by
connecting screws of at least one-fourth inch (1/4") in
diameter. A duel locking mechanism constructed so that both
deadbolt end latch can be retracted by a single action of the
inside door knob, or lever, rttay be suDSiituted provided it
meets ell other specifications for Locking devices.
(d). Inactive leaves. Inactive leaves of double doors shit
be equipped with metal tl uah Dolts nt top end bottom having a
minimum cross-sectional dimension of one-Halt inch (1/2") and
a minimum embedment of five-eighths inches (5/6") into the
Aend and tAreahold of the frame.
(e). Blocking. In wood framing, horizontal blocking shall
be placed between studs nt door lock height for three (0)
stud spaces each aide of the door openings. Any spaces
between jambs and trimmers end adjoining studs shall be
shimmed solid.
(t). Stops. Door stops or wooden jambs for tn-swinging
• doors shall be of one piece construction with the jamb.
lambs for ell doors shell be conatructed or protected so as
to prevent violation of the strike.
(g). Glazing. Glazing in exterior doors within CortY (40")
`--`"" "' e~~y iucwing mecbnn~sm snail De of fully tempered
glass or burglary resistant glszing, except when double
cyclinder deadbolt loc ka are installed.
(h). Btrike plate installation. [n wood frame construction
any open space between trimmers end wood door jambs shall be
solid shimmed by a single piece extending not less than B
inches above and bolow the strike plate. Btrike plates shall
be attacAed to wood with not less than two No. 8 x 2" screws.
All strike plates of doors in pairs shall be installed as
tested.
(i). Hinges. Hinges which are exposed to the exterior shall
be equipped with non-removable hinge pins or a mechanical
'r.tcrlock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior
by removing the hinge pins.
15.40.050 Section 4107 Amended -- Blidin doors. Section
4107 o the ni orm Building ten and ode s amen a to read as
follows:
~~
Section 410?. Sliding doors. Sliding Door ass embties
regulated by this chapter shall comply with UBC Standard 41- •
1, Part II or equivalent standard.
15.24.080 Section 4188 Amended -- Windows. Section 4108 of
the Uni orm uild:ng ecurtty Code is emended to read as follows:
Section 4108. Windows. Window assemblies which are designed
to be openable end which ere regulated by this Chapter shall
comply with UBC Standard 41-2 unless such windows are
protected Dy approved matnl bare, screens or grilles.
Section 410-o~t~e Un: worm Bu lding vecurtty rCOde e:s
to reed as follows:
Section 4109(a). Garage vehicular access doors. Rolling
overhead, solid overhead, swinging/sliding or eccord[on doers
provided tot vehicular access to private garages shall be
constructed end installed •a sat forth in this section.
(b). Such doors shall be provided with an exterior covering
of one of the following:
1
Exterior grade plywood not less then five-
si:teenths inches (S/IB^) in thickness.
2. Aluminum not le as then four-hundredths
(.04") in thickness.
Inches •
3. Steel not less then three-hundredths inches (.Od"1
iu ii:ickness.
4. Fiberglass having a density of not less than five
ounces (5 oz.) per square toot.
5. Wood siding not less than nine-sixteenths inches
(9/18") in thickness.
Section 4109 (c). Locking devices. All locking devices
utilizing a cylinder lock shell have a minimum five (5) pin
tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into
the receiving guide s minimum of one inch (1"). Slide bolt
type locking assemblies shell have a bolt diameter of not
less then three-eighths inch (3/8"). Slide Dolts ahatl
penetrate the receiving guide not less than one and one-half
inches (i-Ii2") and shell be attached with three (3) bolts
that ere not removable from the outside. Rivets shall not be
used to aftech slide bolt assemblies.
Doors exceeding sixteen feet (18') in width shel' be provided
with opposite, centrally locsted locking points, either et •
each side or at top and bottom of the door.
~/ 0
EXCEPTIONS:
• 1. For doors nineteen feet (19') or leas in width, a
single locking point may be used if centrally
located at the floor or top of the door.
2. Doors provided with torsion spring counter-balance
type hardware.
(d). Frames. Prames for garage vehicle access doors shell
be constructed of one o[ the following:
1. Aluminum not less then twelve-hundredths inches
(.12") in thickness.
2. Steel not less then s[x-hundredths inches (.OS^) in
thickness.
3. Wood not leas than one and one-halt inches (1-1/2^)
in thicknaaa.
u naves -- mull: le ramp
Dave o nts. a n orm u ng ecurlty o e a amen e y
ed ng actions 4110 through 4115 to read ns follows:
Section 4110. Complex diagram. There shell De positioned nt
each entrance of a multiple-family development, en
• illuminated diagrammatic representntion of the complex which
shows the location of the viewer and the unit dea[gnations
end locations within the complex.
Section 4111. Lighting Li¢hN n¢_ In mn;rioln_r.m;t..
ewell:nga shell be es [ol lows: ~ ~ ~ ~~ '
Aisles, passageways and recesses related to and within the
building complex shell be illuminated with an intensity o[ at
least twenty-five one-hundredths (,25) footcandles at the
ground level during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices
shall be protected Dy vnndal-resistant covers.
Open perking lots and carports sha 11 De provided with a
minimum of one (1) footenndle o[ light on the parking surface
during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be
protected by vandal resistant covers.
Section 4112. Keying. Upon occupancy, each dwelling unit in
a subdivision or multiple-family development shall have locks
using keys that ere not int enc~angeable with any other
dwelling unit in the suDdivi lion or multiple-family
development.
Section 4119. Definitions.
///
1. "Burglary Resistant Glazing" means those materiels •
as defined in Underwriters Laboratory Bulletin 972.
2. "Double Cylinder Deadbolt" means a dendbolt lock
which can be activated only by key on both the
interior and the exterior sides.
3. "Door Stop" means the projection along the top and
sides of a door jamb which checks the door's
swinging action.
4. "Dwelling" means a buii~ing or port[on thereof
designed exclusively for reaidentisl occupancy,
including single-tamliy dwel Cl nga.
5. "Flushbolt^ is a man uel, key or turn operated metal
bolt normally used on inactive door(s) and is
sttaehed to the top and bottom of the door end
engages in the head and threshold o[ the [rams.
8. "9ing1• Cylinder Dsadboit" means a deadbolt lock
which {a activated from the outside by a key and
lean She inside by a knob, thumb-turn, lever, or
similar maehsnism.
SECTION 14: •
The Mayor shall sign this Ordi nenee and the City Clerk shall
eauae the same to be published within fifteen (IS) days attar its
passage at least once in The Dail Re ort, n newspaper of general
circulation published In the :ty o ntario. Coiffnrni., end
... CL'/St~.i iu ii,a iii [y of lLflnChO CUC ainOngfl, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, end ADOPTED this day of ,
1997.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Dann s Stout, yor
ATTEST:
C~
Beverly A. Authelet, C ty Clerk
Sao
•
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Magulrc, City Engineer
BY: Btane N. Frandsen, Senior Ctvil Engineer
y.~ c`UMO'~C
< Y
4I T
~~, 6
19TC
SUBJECT: Environ•enUl Assesssmt and Negative Declaration for the proposed
Archibald Avenue Realtgnsent and Isproveaent Project, Lity of
Rancho Cucaax>nga, located almg ArohlDaid Avenue between 19th
Street and Highland Avenue and south side almg Highland Avenue
between 220' west and 630' east of the intersectim of Archibald
and H1gAland
gEC01~ElOATI011•
It is recosalended that City Coundl approve the Environsmtal Assesssmt and
issuance of Negative Declaration for the proposed Archbald Avenue Reallgnsent
and IsprovesmL Protect.
BACRQIOUD/AWtY5I5:
In caspliance with the California Envtronsmtal Quality Aet and State
Guidelines/ the attached docusmt5 have been prepared to penHt construction
-f tYa saCJxt vroJact. TIK yruJr<c viii inciuae cne mdemny and isprovesent
of Archibald Avenue fras 19th Street to Highland Avenue, and isProvesent along
the south side of Highland Avenue frds 220' west to 630 east of the
intersection of Archibald and Highland. Said isprovesents will consist of
asphalt cmcrete pavesmt rcplacesent and overlay, installation of concrete
curbs, gutters, sidewalks aM reaps, street lights, and striping and
signing. All properties al mg the east side of the existing right-of-way for
new right-fo-way alignsent belmg to the State of California. In discussion
to date with the Right-of-Nay Agents nor CaiTrans, the City will be allowed to
construct isprovesents under "persit elisinattng the need for right-of-way
acquisition.
Title of the existing house located east of Archibald and north of the
cossercial areas affected by the proposed street has been transferred to the
City of Rancho Cucasonga Dy vl rtue of a purchase order asounting to f500. DO,
and the City is now free under Its discretion to reaove the house.
Excess right-of-way will resin along the west side of the street and will be
retained for a utility corridor to allow Installation and saintenance of
overhea4 and underground utilities.
~~'~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: ARCHIBALD AVENUE ENYIRONNNTAL
ASSE59~ENT
May 20, 1987
Page 2
It will be required to rolcate or athen+iu reconstruct the ezisting
utilities at the tier LIM proposed Foothill Freewy 1s to be constructed whicA
will require speetal dtslgn of such fac111t1es under, around, or through the
depressed freeway section. Theretoro, such is not being considered with the
pro3ect.
The centerline a11ynant and vertiul profile of Archibald Aranw have been
coordinated wlLh tM future freawAy designs, such having bean reviewed and
found atteptable by tIM WlTrans Design staff.
It is the staff's finding that the proposed pr%leet is in conforwance with the
proposed derelopwnt of Archibald Awnw as a srior arterial street and will
not create a s/gnificaM adverse /epacL an the enriroasanL a~M, therefore,
recaoend that tlase iagrorwants be gluon a Negative Declaration as to
enviro~wantai i~patt.
Respac ]y~ subNtted,
:BI :ko
Attacheents
•
r~
n
U
~~a
i j
i
• JJ '~ L croon
x'
v'. i,
~!
^~ Hiyh/ai
•
h
~ ~ /9
rRmtyi
SlKff
V
% ~ /T
na .5ca e .
=~.,'?'~~,a~~9Lp EVE ~'f~af~iY/~~~lT
~,I
:i
.,
~ ,~
Q ~
~1
Avenue _-~
RC Sn?s m M.ru J
Acnvrwy avwv • .rs~.~'is
Q~ '
µ(yY fRirN /+rII~Y K .My~/t.LLtl Ati
9
Avenue
/~ ~ P /.Ytfygf Ytf//yf)f Ay/RLyfMIW /3
I (A~M~N 6.~. ,4wwyJ bue. Cvy t
sM.xr! a 6'*I t4M V' Nt ~ a,r~
~/ prFWey hNyryiw.J.
.. f
.Np y/iRUy
.Sfreef
6r~
I ~
I
i
a i,~,~ov~M~~r
ENVIltONMENTAL REVIEW
APPLICATION
6ERERAL
INITIAL ST[JDY -PART I
For all projects requiring envirorm{erital review, tAts fotn must be rnagleted
and submitted W the Development Review Camittee througA the department where
the protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the
Planning Division staff w111 prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make
recoasaendations to Planning Camatssim. The Planning Comaissim will make one
of three deterwlnations: (1) TM protect wilt haw no styynificant
mviromae{ital impact and a Regatiw Deciaration will be filed, (2) The
project will haw a significant enviromaentai tapact and an Enviraraaental
Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) M additional it~ormation report
should be suppllad by the applicant ylving further lnformaLton concerniig the
Proposed Dro~ect.
Date Fi
Project T1t1
• Applicant's Rama. Address• TllaphoM: C{LV of Ranrhn fnrar,nga
g31n Aa s.. 11no Rnad_ ReneM Gran+nQa_ fr Oi77p
Rama, Address, Telephone of Persoa ?o B~-.^.antacted
Coneernine this Proiaet: o,._.. ~ ~___.___
Sams ac ahnvw. (716) aAa_1RL2 ort iDn
Location Of Pr0~eet: Archibald Avenge from .9th Street to Highland and
Highland Avenue from 220' we<t of Archi held to fi70' ~<t of 1r hibald
Assessor's Parcel Ro.: D~hl1c strnet<
List other permits necessary from local, regionai, state and federal agencies
and the agency issuing such permits: T mnm•arv Str an<,r _ •on< ru iQ~
Permit from the fity of Rnnrho _n :~vtn~a Enrmarl roof D ~ it f tali
1ltstrict A
/ ~~
_i
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Proposed use or proposed protect: kealign centerlines at intersection of •
nr M bald and Highland 'and widen the remaininn unimproved portion of ,lrchiualg
Avenue from 19th Street to Highland, and provide improvement of the southern
street ggrtigns of Highland Avenue G30' east and 220' west of the Archibald inter-
secti
Acreage of protect area and se,uare footage of existing and proposed buildings,
if any: ri/A Alignment and improvement of public street. __
Oescrlbe the envtronmenta_ 1 settles of the pro~ecL site including information
on topography, soil-s a y, plants (trees land animals, any cultural,
historical or scenic aspens, land use of surrounding prapertles, and the
description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary
sheets): rnw arcnibald Avenue Proiect lies in a mix of commercial ang residential
_+„wing „„n«fn0_h.~~~~n<wa Fngtnitt Freeway alignment. The existing street of
e„„ht ha in wwmu i< na„rew between 19th an Highland e1lOH1n0 Oply 1 north and
f~yy~h 1 „„d t„~ ws t„assic. At tn. intersection. traffic !s controlled by a
the
<.„..wr „..nrw„unw< wgrrh and <nnth gf u,e intersection. Tne two southerly
..„5 gf ~ anrhi/u id~w^n bland tntw„<eciinn remains un improved wf to
fy~H]vgtn< trees and heddrs within the ultimat right-of-waY. .
is the protect part of a larger protect, one of a series of cumulative
actions, which although individually small, may as a rrhnle have significant
envtrommentat impact ;,rrnihaln dvenuu is listed as an arterial street in the
!-~'. .., .ai Plwn fnr dwvelg~rnt and Highland %, venue is _ShgwO a5 u
~nl L+~tnr <'rwa t.
•
/~~
t-2
YIIL TNIS PRO.IECT:
• YES HO
1. Create a substantial change in ground contours?
_ ~
2. Create a substantfal change in existing noise el'produce
vibration or glare?
_ ~
3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal
services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. )t _ ~
4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or Generai
Plan desfgnations? x
5. Reapve any existing trees2 How many? Y1 ~
6. Create the need far use or disposal of potentially
hazardous materials such as toxic substances,
flameables or explosives? _ ~
Exptanetton of any YES answers above (attaefi additional sheets if necessary):
-_Existina trees within the street right-of-wav are to be reapv ~ * rovi de
installation of curb b nutter side•~•lks drive aaoroaches and street
lights.
• 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this protect
will generate dally:. _ t1~q
8. Estfmate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this
V .~J ~~.~• II/M
9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this
pro,lect, in cubic yards: _.75u cut/2.000 c.v fill
10. tf the project involves the construction of residential units, complete
the form on the next page.
CERTIFIGTI011: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this
initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements,
and information presente4 are frog and correct to the hest of my knowledge and
belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to
be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning
Oivi<i on.
Oate: ~.,,y ~n,~ur 5lgnaturel ~l~,~ _
Blanc N.. Frond
Title c, r7vn rigs
~a~
i-3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION •
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid the school district 1n assessing their
ability to accomsodate the proposed residentiai development. Developers are
required to Secure letters from the school distrlet far aecamamdattng the
increased number of students prior to issuance of Dullding permits.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract Ho.:
Specific Location of Proiect:
1. Number of single
family units:
2. NumDar of multiple
fwily units:
3. Date proposed to
begin rnnstruction:
4. Earnest date of
occupancy:
Model#
and # of Tentative
5. Bedrooms Price Ranee
PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE • TDTAL
~. •
•
/ ~/
1-4
cITY of RARCHO cucAMOrlca
• PART ZI -INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CRECRZIST
DATE: ~~~~ l ~ S 7
APPLICAMI: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga
FILI`IG DATE: LOC NUMBER:
PROJECT: Archibald Avenue Realianawp~
PROJECT LOGIION: Between 79th street LR Nj~ylan_a euom.y
1. ERVIROMfO?N'fAI IMPACIS
(Explsaation oP all "yea" gad "aayba" anavara an raquicad on atuchsd
aheacs).
YES MAYBE NO
1. Soils and Caoloay, Nill the proposal Nava
. sigeificaat raaulta fa:
a. Unstable ground coadicioas or in changaa Sn
geologic ralacionehipnT K
.r. ~~ by iiuuo t' uu~1/O..~W1NlLb• WWY~~HYU Vir
X
burial of the soil? ~.
c. Chaaga in eopography or ground surface
coneour intervals? _. ~ X
d. The destrucClon, covering or modlficatioa
of any unique geologic or physical Saaruru? _, g
e. Any potential increase in wind or avatar
eroalon of soils, affecCing sither on or oEE
alto condleona? ~_
f. Changaa !n eroalon sil taCion, or deposition? _,,, ~ ](~
g. Exnoaure of p!rople cr property Cc geologic
~hazarda such as earthquakaa, landslides. mud-
alidea, ground Pailure, or similar hasards? ~ %-
h. An inereasa in eha rata of axeracCion snd/or X
. use of any minaral resourcaT .~ --
2. Hvdroloxy. N111 the proposal have algnitlcanc
results in:
~ag
i
4
a. Changes i^_ entreats, or the coarse of direcclon
of Slaving streams, rivers, or ephemeral scream
channels?
b. Changes in absorption races, drainage patterns,
or [ha rata avd amount of surface vster
runoff?
c. Aleerationa to the course or flaw of Elood
vacera?
d. Change in the amount of surface vacer in any
body of vacer?
e. Dlscharge Sato outface vacer, oc any
alteration of surface water quellty?
f. Alearacion of groundwater charac eerie sits?
g. Change in the quanClty of groundwatara,
either through dlrecc additions or with-
dravale, or through interference vieh an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
h. 'Ihe reduction in eha amount aF water other-
wise available for public vacer auppliest
1. Eapoaun of people oz property to water
related hazards such as flooding or eeiches7
sic Quaii ry. wtll ere proposal have aigaifieanc
resoles 1n:
a. Cons [arc or periodic air emisaiona from mobile
or indirect sources?
Stationary sources?
b. Deterio rat Son of ambient air quality and/or
interference with the aetainmenc of app Licable
air quality standards?
c. Al [oration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affac ting air movement, mois cure
or tempera tore?
o~~.a
Flora. 11111 Cha proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characceriacica oP species,
including diversieq, distribution, or number
of any species o[ plants?
b. Reduc clon of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered speeiu o~piaq,ps?
yE5 MdY3E \D
_~ X •
~~ .K._
. x
_ ~
- __ JL
1'.
_ ~ •
Y
e Y
- x
X
x
_ ~- L
't ES `fAY9E ::0
c. Introduction of neu or disruptive species of
• Dlanes into an area? Y
d. Reduction in eha po cential for agricultural
production? ~
Fauna. Will eha proposal have significant zeaulcs
in:
a. Change In the characeeris tics of apeciea,
including diversity, dis[ri6'u[fon, or numbers
of any species of animals? ~
b. Reduction o£ eha numbers of any unique, yarn
or endangered apeciea of animals? ~
c. Introduction of aav oz disruptive apaciaa of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to cha migration or mvaman[ of animals? ~
d. Deeatioracion or r®oval of existing fish or
vildllfe habitat? g
5. Population. Will the proposal have sigalElcaat
resoles in:
a. Will the proposal altar eha location, dlseri-
• bution, dens icy, diversity, or grouch race of
-
[he human population of an area?
Y
b. Will the proposal affect existing howing, or
create a demaad for additional howing? X
6. Soc1o-Economic Factors. WS11 eha proposal have
aignificanr results in:
a. Change in Local or regional aocio-economic
characteristics, including acoeomlc or
coomerclal diversity, tax race, aad property
values? ~ _ _
b. W111 pro~ecc coo to be equitably distributed
among prol act beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or pro~ac[ users? X _
7. Land Use and Planning Conalderationa. Will the
proposal have significant resul cs in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an gran? ~ _
6. A contllct with any daaignationatob~ectives,
policies, ar adopted plans of arty govarnmancal
-
anti Gies? _
K
c. An impact upon the qulaiey or quantity of
axis clog conaumpcive or non-conaumptiw
cecreacional opporcunit~a~ O ~ ~ _ ~-
'=_= -
ees :uyse ~o
8. Transportation. W111 the proposal have signit is ant
rnsul to ia: •
a. Cennration of substantial additional vehicular
movamen c? _ ~_
b. Effects on exiacing s[ree cs, or demand for
new street construction? ~
c. Effects on existing parking fac111tiea, or
demand for nev parking? ~
d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems? ~
e. AltezaCions Co present patterns of circula-
tion or movmant of people and/or goods?
f, Alears[Sons to or affects on present and
poeaatlal eater-borne, rail, mesa traasie or
air traffic? _ ~
g. Incrwas in traffic hazards co motor vehicles,
61cyc11sts or pades Ctiam? _ ~
9. Cultural gaaoureae. W111 eha proposal have
significant resulea in: •
a. A diaxurbanca to the integrity of archawlogical,
paleontological, and/ar his torlcal resources?
- proposal-haw•algnificanc 'resultsv in: ..~.. •'
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? X
b, Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X
c. A rlak of azploslon or release of hazardous
subataacas So the event aE an accident? X
d. M Sncreas• in the nunber of individuals
or spaeiaa of vector or pachanogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms? X
e. Inereasa in exiacing noiaa levels? _ %
f. Exposure of people to pc Centially dangerous
noise levels? _ ~
g. The creation of o6~ectiona6la odors? _ ~ •
h. An increaa• in light or glare? ,_ ~
~/
xes NAY9° »o
11. Aesthetics. Still the proposal have signif Scan[
• results in:
a. the oheetuetion or degradation of any scenic
vista of viw? X
b. the treatlon of an aesthetically offena ive
site? X
c. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors? X
12. Ct111t'.ea and Public Services. Will the proposal
have a significant nand for nw systems, or
alinraeiona to eha follwing:
a. Electric pavar2 X
b. Natural or packaged gas?
c. Commun£catiana systems? ~
d. Water supply? __ ~
e. pastwater £acil£ties? ^_ ~
E. Flood control atructuraa? ~
•
Salad
t
f
ill
i
? _
g.
ae
ea
was
e
e _ ~
h. Flre protection? ~
i. 7v Sias y. .a..-ca^, X
~. Schools? ~
k. Parks or other recreational facilities? ~ _- ~
1. Maintenance of public fat £Litfea, Secluding
roads and flood control £acilitiee? ~
m. Other govarnmeneal services? ~
17. EneraY and Scarce Resources. Gill [ha proposal
have significant results in:
a. L'se of substantial or exceaa ive fuel or energy? ,~ )(_,
b. Subscancial Sncreaaa in demand upon existing
sources of energy,
e X
_
c. An increase in the demand Eor devalopmane of
nav aourcaa of anatgy? ~ __ X
d. An incraaae or perpacuacion of the consumption
of non-ranwaSls forms of enargq, when feasible
renwabl• aourcea of energy era availa6la? ~, ~_. K
/3a
2:ye O
YES ilAY9E `10
e. Subs tantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce wcural resourta?
_ 1
14. Nandatory Findiaaa of Sitnificance.
a. Does the proleet have the potential to degrade
the gwlity of the environment, aubaeaneially
reduce the habitat of fish or vlldlifs species,
cave a flab or wildlife population eo drop '
below salt swtaining levels, threaten eo
eliminate a plant or animal eommm~ity, rnduce
eha nusbar or restrict [he range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important exoplu of the color periods of
California hiatorq or prehfatort'? ~
b. Doan the protect have the potawtlal Co achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
mviro~antal goaleT (A short-tern impact on the
am/irooawnt L one which occurs fo a ralativaly
brut, dafinltiva period of tine while loog-
tarm Lpaeu vlll aadurm well into the future). _ ~
c. Dou eha prof act have fapuee vhieh era
individually llaitad, but euaulatively
cooaidacabla? (Cuaulativaly cowlderabla
means that the ioererntal effects of ao
individwl protect are conaidarable whsa viwW •
in comucion with the effects oP pact Drol tees,
and probable future prof aces). _ ~,
d. Dona eha protect Fuve envirowental effects
vhieh will cause aubatantial adverse effects
on human bainga, aliher directly or Indirectly? ~
II. DISCUSSION OF ENOZEONI4NTAL EVALUATION <1. e., of affirmative amwara eo
the above quea tiona plus a discussion of proposed mitigation meaaucas).
See Attached Sheets
•
X33
Page 7
LII. DETERNINATION
On the beia of Chia initial evaluation:
• ~ I find the proposed prof tee CODLD NOT have a significant effect
on the arvirowent, and a NEGATIVE DECLIRATION viii be prepared.
_ I find that although the proposed project could have a aigniEican[
%%% effect on eha environment, there vlll not be a aigniflcanc effect
in Chia ease becawe the mitigaelon measure described on an
attached shut have bean added to the prof set. A NEGATIVE
DECLIRATION DILL BE PREPARED.
L find the propoaad project MAY have a signifLcant effect on the
enviramear. and an ENVI$ON.ffNT L~ACT REPORT is required.
t
Data Mav 20. 1987
g e
gut rc
Cjty Enajneer
Title
•
~3~
ENYIRDNMENTAI IMPACTS
Soils and &oloa~•.
lb. The reallgnaarrt of Archibald Uwards the east of the existing roadway
section shall require ewbankaant U fill a dip at the southeast corner of
the Archibald 8 Highland lntersectton. The proposed widening of tho south
side of Highland avenue will require an e~banknent fill Fran 1 or 4 feet
Tn height. Anew retaining wall will be used west of Archibald along the
fronUge of an existing residence.
le. An existing Eucalyptus windbreak along the south side of Highland, east of
Archibald will ba reeved. TAe field provlously protected has now been
secured by the SUte of California for right-of-way for the Foothill
Freenwly eliNnatlrng the need for an agricultural windbreak. A natural
ground cover exists now an the prortously eultlrated field.
4a. As noted, an old Eucalyptw windbreak of approxinaUly 17 trees will De
ranorad. TAe tress are rat natural, befog originally planted for
agriculUral purposes. The vineyard which tM trees originally protected
has recently bean cleared by the SUU of California to provide right-of-
way for the future Foothill Froaway.
Sec1o-Eeonoslc Factors•
• 6a. One boo, located within the realigned portion of Archibald, has been
purcMsed iron the $UU of G11forn1a for raaoval and deao11t1on and will
be ranoved or deaalished as part of the prolecL. TAfs house has been
vacant now for several months.
The evi c}/„n ti~1Awr~L .. w~-
o SGati,wva~ crrrrer of Highland and ArcAlbald
1s that residence irAlch is the Host greatly affected. Archibald Avenue
will save away iron the house precluding or r'enovtng access onU Archibald
Avenue. The Nlyyhland widening will reduce the alrcagy substandard
setback. The rcsldenU Mve or canpleted street dedlatlons previous U
the proiect by virtue of a parcel nap property division. Anew driveway
1s pproposed U provide access U the property franc Highland Avenue. Anew
canabinatlon rotalning and garden wall 1s also proposed along Highland
Avenue to rcsUrc privacy due U tM adntnal setback iron the street. The
residents arc agreeable and have signed aright-of-entry fona for the work
to proceed.
It is ntted Lhat a vacation of the old Archibald Avenue right-of-way would
return property to this haeowner. The vacation is currently restricted
by ut111ties within the right-of-way. Representatives of CalTrcns,
District 8, also recaeseend retaining the excess right-of-way until freeway
rasp configurations aro finalized.
~3S
6b. The project is currently proposed Mth funding froe the Systeas
Developeent Fund, no lien or retiabursee~ent funding is presentl
eonsiderod. One pending derelopannt along the real side of Archibaid~
north of 19th, can be targeted b refatiurse the cost of their frontage
toprovenents. The reenining ArchlDald frontage and the frontage along
Highland, east of Archibald all belong b etcher the City of Rancho
Cucaex~nga or the State of California. I~proveeents along Highland, rest
of Highland rill be publicly funded in exchange for driraray rolocatlon
free access on Archibald b access on Night and Avenue.
7a. The pro~ant street a1lgrMnt rill shift easterly vacating a long wedge of
land 73 rldt at the mrth, tapering b zero nid-xay through tM real{fined
portions of Arch/0ald Avemn. A debtled title search as b Orenrship of
the underlying foe title mould indtcab that to vacating the lands back b
the orrmrs that only the two northerly parcels aro eligible for vacation
Mth ana parcel vacatable b private party with tin steond parch going to
the State. Cal Trans represenbtires haw requested the C1ty not vacate
aqy right-of-ray at this t1ae, stating tint both pteps 4Y be rneded for
freeway access at a later dab. Those excess properties son<A of the
State-ornd property an of sltwr proportions no rider than 3 fpt aM tf
vacated would return b property across tin street and would separab tM
street fronting parcels free access b ArehlWld Avenue. vacation of
Lhese parcels are tenrofor not neo>•ended.
TM easterly reallgg~~wwsannL rill traverse or eneraeA across laM belonging
to tM Stab of California. Right-of-MAy Agents for tM State nea~end
tM issuance of an Enerwehaxnt Persft rMnby tin Sbb arinbins
ownership dw b the proposed Foothill Fnwny eonstructlon. Sueh•
property is currontlY vacant except for a single faHly residence, rhiM
vas recently sold by the Stab b tM C1ty of Rancho Cutaeonga b
'tci~'U~ur-the~D~r0.lect.-,.The encrwclaent pereft hes Dean applied for and
.. - ,-......y ....r.w..
Transportation
8a. The teproveaent of tM street will factlibb additional eavaaxmt of
through traffic in all directions at the lnbrsection. The teproreetents
rill not generate traffic to and of itself, yet W' attract additional
usage due b comenlenee.
Ut111t1es and Pub11e Servtas
12a. Due b the slgnlflant centerline roallgn•ent of Archibald Avenue 80'
east, existing purer poles 1n tM old street stetlon r111 ultleately
need b De rolocated b the new configuration of the street. TM street
aoving gray free the utilities required only one or two poles to De
reeoved with no new facilities except street lights to be added. The
poles to be raabvad served the existing strucbros which is sited for
rearoval.
/3k
12f. At present story waters frog Jadeite, north
• across Highland by their downhill ieoeenta.
1nsUlled at tha Jadeite, Highland Intersection
will be extended to Archibald along Highland to
voluae stone flaws W the Archibald stores drain.
•
~J
of Highland, are carried
New catch basins will 6e
and a new connector p1 pe
transrlt nuisance and low
/3 ~
RESOLUTION N0. ~ 7 ~ a'S 7
• A RESOLUTION FO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIMT THE ENVIRONEIITNAL
ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY, AND ISSUANCE dF A NE6ATIYE
DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED ARCHIBALD AVENUE REALIGNMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT PRQIECT
NIEREAS, the California Envlrorrental Quality Act requiros
governaental agencies LD develop standards and procedures, and to consider
alternattres of all proposed acLtons affecting the environ.ent an all public
agency pro,~eets, such as this Archibald Reallgnaent and Iproveaent Protect;
and
NHEREAS, an EnviraneenLal Assessaent Initial StuQy has been prepared
for the said project pursuant W the CaliforMa Environsrntal Quality Act, as
aended; aM
NNEREAS, t11e C1;y Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucasonga has for its
conslderaLton all Lhe avallabia input and has rwiewed ease concerning the
proposed Archibald Avenw RN1lgnsent and taprovaaent Project.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, tMt the C/ty Council of the Ct;y of
Rancho Cucaeonga does herby resolve as follows:
• SECTION 1
The City Council of the ttty of Rancho Cucaeonga hereby a roves the
Envlronantal Assessaent Initial Study and issuance of a Negative ~eelaratfon
fnr fh~ nrnnn<M arrh/halA av~n~~~ null~nrnf anA Twnrnyr~n/ Dmlwf
SECTION 2
The City Clerk 1s directed to f11e a Notice of OeteralnaLlon pursuant
Lo the California Envtron•ental Quality Act.
~.J
/38
~'J
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: May 20, 1987
T0: City Councii and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Blane k. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer
L~U N~Nn
t '
<~
~! r
} ^ A
t- i ^ Z
v v >
197;
SUBJECT: Approval of Envlrormrmtal Assessment Initial Study and issuance
of Negative Declaration to perwlt the construttion of store
drain and street improvements for Hillside Road beMeen
MalacMte and Archibald Avenues pursuant to the Enviroraaental
Quality Act.
RECDI~EIOATIOM•
It is rKOmmmded that the City Council approve the attached Resolution
approving the Envlronraental Assessment initial Study and issuance of a
kegative Declaration for the proposed Hillside Road Storms Drain and
Reconstructtm between Malachite and Archibald Avenue protect. tt is
also recommended that staff be directed to pursue an Emlcent Domain
actlce to acquire the missing right-of-way followed by a Chapter 27
implementation of the 1911 Act.
Gwi.wawiwir7i%niiiri i5i5:
In compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act and State Guidelines, the Environmental Assessment initial
Study has Deen prepared to perwlt construction of the above protect.
These improvements generally entail the widening of the street,
installation of stores drain, removal and replacement of the existing
:treat pavement, construction of curb and gutters, sidewalks and
driveway approaches, as well as installation of street lights.
Right-of-way for these proposed improvements exist at Lhe north side of
the street being voluntarily dedicated in exchange for frontage
improvements, of the southerly right-of-way, 840 linear feet of the
street frontage has been dedicated. One property remains to dedicate
along the south side of about 330 feet in length. An easement for the
storm drain installation does exist.
Negotiations with the property owners have been unsuccessful to date.
The City has proposed an exchange of improvements for the desired rlght-
of-way, and has added to the normal exchange the install a*1on of a new
steel water tank and regrading and relandscaping for the frontage of the
property.
~~
CITY CODIICII STAFF REPORT
RE: HILLSIDE ROAD EMy. ASSESS.
May 20, 1987
Page 2
Two ma,or alternatives ezlst with regards to tM project; 1) leave out
tM 330' portion, leaving a half street pavaent fronting the north half
of tM street only, and 2) proceed MLA an Eminent Dwain xtion. The
later mould eerlt a follw up 1911 action to make equltaDle tM
distribution of right-of-why costs to all properties along this section
of Hillside Rad.
A third action to watt or do notht~ mould not sea appropriate due to
tM recent execution of agrasent with north side properties exchanging
right-of-way improveaaents.
It is tM Engineering's staff finding tMt although tM proposed pro~eet
could Mw a sign/titan! effect on tM envlronesnt, 1t is concureant
with the Central Plan that H111side Rad be developed to Lhe proposed
widths and that, except as noted, a malorlty of tM fronting rostdents
Mw exttnded rlgM-of-why dedications, sasie in exMnge for
improveaants, and tMt mitigating measurts W off-set tM anviron•antal
impacts Mw been consldend.
Staff thenfon requests that a Regattw Dtelaratlon M granted to the
project. Staff ales rtqutsts auLhorizatlon W purses right-of-wey •
acquisition in tM forte of an EminenL Deeain xttan to obtain the
elssing right-of-way required by tM pro,1ect.
Reulhy submitted,
~~ 3%-•.
RH :8 o
Attxhmats
C,
J
~~
ENVIltONMENTAL REVIEW
APPLICATION
GENERAL
INITIAL STUDY -PART I
For all protects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed
and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where
the protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the
Planning Division staff will prepare Part 11 of the Initial Study and make
recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make ono
of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no siggnificant
environmental Impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The
protect will have a significant enviromiental impact and an Environmental
Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) M additional 1/~orwatlon report
should De supplied by the applicant gluing further information concerning the
proposed protect.
Oate Filed: M u /3 ~ /y87
Protect Title: Hil is ide Road Storm Urain and Reconstruction Protect
. Applicant's Ness, Address, Telephone: L'i tv of Rancho Cucamonca. Encineecinc
43ZU base Line Road. Rancho Cucaennua. CA 91730
Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted
Concerning this Pro feet: Rlane w Cr.ndea,.. c+ rt..+a r_-a-._.. ve
(7.41 9UJ-ldo2. ext. 32U
Location of Protect: Mil lside Road_Storm Urain end Street Reconstruction.
be tueen Malachite and Arc ibal Avenues.
Assessor's Parcel No.: Public street
List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federai agencies
and the agency issuing such permits: r mn .ra rv ct r., t cl .corn- nnc trnr inQ_
Pernit from the Cttv of Rancho Cucxmnnn,..
,7
~J
PROJECT DESCRIPTIdI
Proposed use er proposed project: The installation of storm drain anu ultirwt~
of denin0. of the existine street section _al lowine the construction of asphalt
nn r t pyyement_ curbs and Butte rs._ and street liohts.
Acreage of protect area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings,
if any: NIA Reconstruction of existinD street.
Describe the environmental se_ ttinq of the proiect site inctudtng information
an topography, so7T sEa-6iT1ty, plants (trees 1, land anisfals, any cultural,
historical or scenic sspeets, land use of surrounding properties, and the
description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary
sheets): The Hillside Road Pro.iect which fronts on oroaused Low-Medium Residential
zone is a narrow heretofore private rcadwav serving nLmari iv agrirulLrral
land at orssent. The northern side_of the sSr_eeL.is_nlauied._ullhsraaevlnes
~urooses exlsu narsrv ulcmn zne grnonsen rtpns-nr-dav_
[s the protect part of a larger proleet, one of a series of cumula!IVe
actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have stgnlficant
environmental impact rlis 's f rh r pit 1 rays t Dr~ ty ~,€,~
1'~t~r nnA in cnn in rmg nru Wtih Ma ctar Olan fin rm nr~in and thu Gf roes
f+rrulatinn Flamont of the fene r.l Dlan
/~ a
I-T
MILL TRIS PROJECT: YES NO
• 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ~
2. Create a substantial change in existing noise i? produce
vibration or glare? )L
3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal
services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ R
4. Create changes in the existing Zontng or General
Pion designattons2 _ g
5. Remove any existing trees? How manyT~_ ,y_,
6. Create the need for use or dlsDosal of potentially
hazardous materials such as toxic substances,
flammaDles or explosives? _ ~
Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary):
Tiw.~.~vi`ci^g rna will hw rwmovwd and ihw nwu rnnmuav u111 hr raicwA
nn a rneauay w.mhankmwn from .l' m 6' ma xf .m uhu rw wxi<ti ng cu..lwe rnrrwntly
_ua cli ov r hw < r f. is rnu of Fur lyptuc trww< fall ui thin thw rieht.nf_uay
• facilities.
7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this pro,lect
will generate daily: uia
8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this
nrnlw!• _...
9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this
prq)ect, in cubic yards: Son y y~~~ri ~~+~nn ~ y sill
10. If the Dro,)eet lnvoives the construction of residential units, complete
the form on the next page.
CERTIFIGTION: [hereby certify that the statenrcnts furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this
initial evaluation to the DesL of my ability, and that the facts, statements,
and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I further understand that additional information may De required to
be submitted before an adequate evaluatton can be made bx the Punning
Division.
Oate: Idav E0. 1931 Signatu
B one W. Fr~nosan
Title Cr_ Civil Fns{{+..
/ U3
i-3
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION .
The folloMing information should be provided to the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their
ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are
required to secure letters frw the school district Ior aecaaaaodattng the
increased nusber of students prior to issuance of building permits.
Naaa• of Developer and Tentative Trott No.
Specific Location of
PHASE I PNASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE { TOTAL
1. Number of single
(wily units: ~ _
2. Number of multiple '
fw11y units: _
3. Date proposed to •
begin construction: _
4. Earnest date of
occupancy: _
Modelir
and i of Tentative
5. Bedrooms Pr1ta Range
~~~
I-4
• CITY OF RA.YCHO CUCAMONGA
FART II - INITIAL S'PJOY
E.WIRONMENTAL CHECR'LIST
DATE: H3N I;z~ (Qg 7
APPLTCANT: City of Rancho Cucamonm~
FILI:IC DAT':_ LOG NDMBER:
PROJECT: Hillside Road Storm Dr~in ~nd a r r1 0
daft
PROJECT LCCATION:Bettr¢en Malaehlra ,.,~ n_..u._.. ..
I. ENVIRO:`tEN'TAL IMPACTS
(Explaaae!on of all "yea" and "maybe" aaavara era required oo ac tachad
sheets).
YES MAYBE NO
1. Sol la and Gaoloav. pill the proposal have
• significant raaulra in:
a. Unstable ground eondiclona or in change in
geologic relarionahipsl X
-• "• .oy ~iuaa, aiaplacementa, compaction or
burial of eha ao11T x
c. Change !n topography or ground suzface
contour intervals? X
d. The des cructio¢, covering or modification
at any unique geologic or physical features? X
e. Anq potential Snereaae 1n vind or vaear
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
nice condicons? ~
E. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? _
~
g~ a<posure of peep la ur property [o geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
_ ~
h. An increase in the rata of extraction and/or
-, use of any mineral resouzuT
_ ~
2. H~•d zoloay, Will the proposal have significant
results in:
~Y7
~= -
a
xes >ur3= sa
a. Changes in currents, or [he cou: se of direc cion
o£ flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream
channels? __ ~ •
6. Changes Sn absarp cion rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runoff? ~ _~
c. Alterations to [he course or flow of flood
waters? ~.
d. Change Sn the amount of surface eater in any
body of water? ~
e. Discharge into surface waters, ar any
al ceration of surface water quality? X
f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? X
g. Change !n ehs quantity of groundwtcara,
either through direct additions or with-
dzawals, or through interference with as
aquifer?
Quali[q?
Quantity? _ X
h. 'fhe reduction 1n the amount of water othar-
wiaa available for public water aupplieal %
_
•
1. Exposure of people or property to eater
ralacnd hazards such as flooding or seichee? _ ~*
n..
__ n..n .. .a.n .h- _w __. a. .._.
_____ _ r__~ _ .._.. tea....--...
t
CeaUl C9 1n
a. Constant or periodic air emiasiom from mobile
or indirect sources? ~
Stationary sources? ~
~
b. ne terioratlon of ambient air quality and/or
in certerance with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards? X
c. Alteration of local or regional climatic
condltiona, affec sing air movement, moss cure
ar temperature? _ y_
SLo ca
Flora. {Jill [he proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change En the characteristics of apecln,
including diversity, die cribu cion, or number - .
of any species of planes? ~, ~.._
b. Reduction of the numbara of any unique, rare
or endangeud apatite of planca? ~ X
/ ~1~
c. inc roductioa of new or disruptive species of
• planes into an area? ~
d. seduction Sn the oo tantial far agricultural
production'. ~
Fauna. Will the proposal have sign if icanc results
in:
a. Change is the characteristics of species,
including diversity, disc r'_Sucon, or numbers
of any species cE animals'. v
b. Reduction of the numbers oi~ anv unique, rare
or endangered species of animals? ~
c. introduction of nev ar disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result Sn a battler
to cha migration or movement of animals? ~
d. Deterioration or removal of existing Eish or
wildlife habitat? X
5. Fonulat ion. tJill the proposal have significant
resul [s in:
• a. W111 the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, dens sty, diversity, or grow ch rate of
tha human popuiatlan of an area? X
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
rred re a demand fnr adds ri neat finnvino~ X
6. Socio-Hc onomic Factors. rill the proposal have
s ign is icanc results in:
a. Change in local or regional sot io-economic
characteristics, including economic or
comment sal diversity, [ax rate, and property
values? X
S. Will project costs be equitably dis tt ibu ted
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers ar proj etc users? Y»
~. snd L'sa and piannin¢ Considerations. Will the
~e~ •.e.e aigr. ..Can. tea... wa ln.
d. A i'1b5C1n[ldl d1CeLdC10n Of Che pte9 enC OL
planned land use of an area? _, y
.,. A co nilicc with any des igna dons, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any governmental
enc it tes'. -_
_~
c. 2.n impact upon the qulaicy or quantity of
existing consumptive or non-consume [ive
re<reat Sonal oppor[unicies ___ ~
~ ~ ~
_5 ~.iq-_3E _C
8. ?ranscortat ion. Will the proposal have signif is ant
results in: •
a. Generation of subs tancial additional vehicular
movement?
b. Ef feces on existing scree ts, or demand for
new street canscruccion? g
c. Effects on existing parking fat Sli ties, or
demand for new parking? %
d. Subs tancial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems? ~
e. Al test lone to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and/or goods? ~
f. Al cerations to or effects on present and
potential water-borne, rail, mass cranaic or
air traffic?
b
g. Increases Sn traffic hazards to mo cor vehicles,
b SCycllats or pedes crlana?
9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
•
a. a disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
paleontological, and/or hisco rical resources? ~
l(1 Vn~.l •L
f~C.~.. .-J ~,..• ....~ neat ~.~s
V
proposal have significant resin ts
in:
a. Creac ion of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? X
h. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? %
c. ,1 risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an act idenc? X
d, An increase Ln the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenc genic
organisms or the exposure of people Co Such
organisms?
e. increase in existing noise levels? ~ X
f. Exposure of people co po ten trolly dangerous
noise levels? );
g. The creation of ab~ecclonable odors? _ % .
h. do increase in Light or gl
ar
e? _
/
/
/`1'~
Ll. Aeschecics. (Jill the proposal have sign if icanc
• resulcs in:
a. The obs [ruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view? y_
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site? ~
c. A conflict with the objective of designated
or pocen tial scenic corridors? K
1'_. L't ilities and Public Services. Wi11 the proposal
have a significant aced for new systems, or
alterations to the Eo Moving:
a. Electric power? ~, __ _
b. :Ia[ural at packaged gaa? ~
c. Co®unicatioua syatems? ,~ _
d. Watez supply? ~ _
e. Wastewater facilltiaa? _
f. Flood control structures? x
• _
X
g. So11d waste facilities?
h. Fire prate<cioa? Y,
i. Police pro tectlon? _, ^ _
j. Schools? _ _
k. Parks or other recreational facilities? %
1. waintenance of puh lic facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities'. X _
m. Ocher governmental services? a.
13. Ene rqy and Sca ree Resources. W111 the prooosal
have sign if i<anc resulcs in:
a. Cse of sub s[an[la1 or excessive fuel or energy? ~'
h. Subscancial Socrease in demand upon existing
sources of energy? _ __ 1L.
c. M increase in the demand for development of
new sources of energy? ~, __ 7L
d. An increase oc perpetuaC ion of the conaump Lion
of non-renewable forma of energy, when Eeas ib le
renewable sources of energy are available? ~ ~_ ~
/~~
~ "c o
e. Subscan[Sal depletion of any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
14. Nandatorv Findlnzs cE SSZn if Stance.
a. Does the project have Che potential to degrade
the quality of ehn environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or vildl ifs population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten [o
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict [he range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
Y°S :*AY3°_ ::0
a` •
X-
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, co [ha disadvantage of Sang-tem.
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on thn
environment is sae which occurs is a relatively
brief, dafinttiva pariad of time while long-
term Smpacea will endure yell Snto the future). ~
c. Dote the project have impaeta which era
indlvldually limited, but cumulatively
comidarable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effecea of an
individual project are conslderab le when viewed •
is connec tlen with the effects of pant pro}ecta,
and probable future prof nc cs). K
d. Doea [he project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or Sndirec cly? Y
II. DLSC:'SS ION OF ENVIRCNPffNTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of aFfirmative answers co
the shove ques [ions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
(See attached Sheets)
/~
2a 3e 7
III. DETERMINATION
On the basis of [his initial evaluation:
• I~-~ L find the proposed project COCLD `tOT have a signif icanc effect
ILJI on the environment, and a .NEGATIVE DECL,IR.ITZON will be prepared.
_ I find that although the proposed project could have a signif icanc
ggI of fecc on cha ewlronmenc, there will noe be a signif icanc effete
!n ehis case because the micigaeion measures described an an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION GILL BE PREPARED.
~I I fled the proposed projece MAY have a signif icanc effect on [he
t ~. envirnment, and an ENVIROYaE`iT IaPACT REPORT is required,
Date~n:.~ vn :qA7
Russell H. Maguire
_ tY tv Engi near
Title
•
~~/
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
l.b.c. The reconstruction of the street requires the catching of grades for
the ad,tointng isprovaients at east and west end of the protect. An
~banksmt varying fros 0' to 6' is needed to fill the existing dip
1n the street. The street regarding and street esbanksent
construction will require driveway rasps into the southerly
properties.
l.e. Much of an existing Eucalyptus tree windbreak falls within the
roadway and right-of-way W11 Aave W be resoved. The groves which
the wind break protects still exists and therofore, a replanting of a
Eucalyptus windrow almg the new roadway albanksent Ts proposed.
2.b.c. Properties issedlatlly north of Hillside Road are relatively
unbproved, either being vacant or used as a large agricultural
estate with dirt driveways, ditching and street drainage to N111side
Road. Such runoff drains over the street and onto tM south side
properties. Sale of the flows are Intercepted in a ditch or Swale at
the easterly end of the protect area and carried easterly to Alta
Lau Creek.
A new storms drain will be installed 1n tM street W pick up
concentrated flows fras the westerly end of the protect and will
transdt such through the new stone drain connecting to m existing
• drain 1n Hillside. The existing drain spttes into the Aita Lana
Channel. Nater which has heretofore crossed Hillside will De
Intercepted by the new stores drain and street isprovesents and
transsitted directly to the Alta Lana Channel.
7.1 The nw e~n.~ A._L. ^ra. ~-~ll 1i.tci ti- _ ._.
•~-^ "Y 'yt Yi fa4e IYIIVII 1111!lO IIaS
traditionally crossed over Hillside Road with senor street flooding
running througA the south side properties 1n dirt ditch eventually
reaching /sproved streets earth of Nilson where such was intercepted
and taken to the Alta Lou Channel. The new store drain should
relieve the localized street flooding and flowage through the
properties south of Hillside.
6.b. The protect to open and wt den the street has requtrod the acqulsitlon
of a public right-ot-way. There are three fronting parcels involved
in the right-af-way workings. One owner was required to dedicate as
a condition of an earlier parcel sap, yet such land division predated
the City's current roqulresents to isprove the street. The second
parcel covering the entire north half of the street has DeM acquired
in a right-af-way for Isprovesent exchange which was accepted by
Council earli?r this year.
a~
~Sa
The third or renaming parcel on the south side of the street has
re,~ected an offer to exchange iHprovements for a right-of-wa~
dedication. An ainant daHain action to acquire the Hissing right-
of-way 1s anticipated to complete the improveHents as originally
considered for the project. The equity of an enlnant daewin action
with rcgvds to the two other parcels would sees in question where
such have received as caHpensatlon far dedication the value of the
proposed lnproveHents. It is therefore proposed etthv to leave off
finished 1Hprovements at this last property or to 1Hpose a Chapter 27
action of the 1911 Act to assess for the f1na1 inprovenents.
An additional caHpltcatian with regards to this property is Lhe
disposition of an old, but active irMgatton reservoir or concrete
tank. The reservoir collects water froth springs in caves north of
the City 11H1ts.
A steel water tank has been proposed similar 1n sMpe to the existing
water tanks used throughout tM C1Ry. A closed tank is rccaswended
for safety purposes W e1lNnste Hosqutto control and unauthorized
and unhea thful swtmeing, both which are noted with wgards to the
existing reserwir. A rcpleceepnt fac111ty or tM abandariHent of the
existing reservoir will have to De provided to allow the full street
widening to proceed. TM existing reservoir encroaches not quite
half-way into the ultfnete street Mght-of-wy.
e.a. The opening of tM street as a puDlie street M11 legalize Hoch of
the ezlsting usage of this section of tM street. •
The current width of tM street 1s insufflclent for two-way traffic
wlthouL one car pu111ng off Lhe paveHents to ailow the other to
pass. The ravelled and a111gatored pavements are also in an advanced
sage of deurioracion, neeerng replacement.
N1dening of the street aM opening such to formal public usage and
improving the riding surface and rsoval of flood nuisance will
Invariably make the street more attractive for usage. Th1s being the
only collector street connection north of Milson, 1t is anticipated
that traffic w111 De conslderaDly Mgher then a local street traffic
volume on the order of a resldenLlel collector street.
8.b. The rgrtherly 1/3 of Hillside Road between MafacMte and Amethyst
will resin unimproved at the end of this project. It is estlHated
Lhat such an remain a wh11e longer unt11 the property develops or
until traffic daeand increases to warrant further widening. Other
portions of H111s1de Road have ;ust been widened at the Alta Lama
Creek. A stretch of Hillside between Hermosa and Mayberry also
remains narrow. Each individua~ widening of portions of Mills/de
pushes this street towards being a througA street from west of
Carnelian to east of Haven.
/,5-3
8.e. The opening and widening of this reach of Hillside is anticipated to
• attract north side traffic presently detouring around Hillside using
Nilsen Avenue.
8.g. A traffic fatality has been recorded within the project reach just
west of the Archibald intersection. The opening and widening of the
street to current street width standards will better provide for the
public safety. The additional use of the street by traffic attracted
to the improved street will increase the potential for traffic
accidents. Offsetting benefits and hazards arc seen. The improving
of the street and widening of the street and removal of current flood
and pothole hazard is viewed as a net benefit.
30.6. An old irrigation reservoir exists along the project route which
encroaches into the street right-of-way. Negotiations to acquire the
right-of-way to widen the street would provide for the removal of
this open tank or reservoir.
Mosquito abatement is evident with small fish having been pi anted in
the reservoir. Also, unsanitary human usage of the tank for swiawing
is also to evidence. Aright-of-way exchange offered a new steel
tank to replace the old reservoir. Shouid an ainant domain action
be considered t0 acquire the street right-of-w;y, the tank will have
to be purchased for removal and/or roptaced with a new tank. A
closed tank to avoid the current hazard and nuisance should be
considered.
• 12.a.c. Electric power and telecommunication pot es and overhead lines occupy
a location about dead center in the street right-of-way.
It is currently proposed to relocate such facilities to the north
yai wwaj i,idi lily LinE iii.cS ii, dii u~,ii n,cnu wiiui Lion.
12. d. h. The water meters and hydrants along the street will have to be
relocated by virtue of the reconstruction. Utility notices have
already been circulated.
12.f. The installation of drainage facilities for the Master Plan Storm
Drain shall be coordinated with the street construction. Catch
basins and the proposed 36" diameter RCP shall be installed prior to
paving. The flood control structure shalt serve to re-direct storm
water flow underground from its surface flow.
12.h.i.j. The usage of this reach of Hillside Road by police, f1 re, and
school buses are all in evidence. The format opening and improving
of the street will add t0 the convenience of alt three agencies.
12.1, The existing, although private, roadway hss been maintained by the
City in the past with Ctty crews filling potholes and paving portions
of the south side Swale and dike.
The parements viii De completely replaced, rel' wing the need for
pavement repairs for several years. New curbs and gutters and
additional street pavement are added to the street system for
additional maintenance to the future.
~~7
RESOLUTION N0. &'~~ ~s~
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FDR THE PROPOSED HILLSIDE ROAD STORM GRAIN
ANO RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
NHEREAS, Lhe Hillside Road Stow. Drain and Reconstruction as a Public
Agency Protect shall be subteet to comply with the Cattfornia Environmental
Quality Act necessary to protect, rehabilitate and enhance the enviromaental
quality of the State; and
NHEREAS, an EnviroraaenWl Assessment IMt1a1 SWQy has been prepared
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as maended; and
IAIEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Aas for its
cwsideratlon all available inputs and has reviewed same concerning the
proposed Hitlstde Rwd Protect.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the C1ty of
Rancho Cucamonga dws hereby rcsoived as follows:
Section 1.
• The City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Lucaaanga hereby approved the
Environmental Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Negative Declaration
for the proposed Hillside Rwd Stores Drain and Reconstruction Protect.
The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Determination pursuant
to the California Environaental Quality Act.
~SJ`
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI4IONGA
STAFF REPOftT
GATE: May 70, 19ST
TO: City Council and City Manager
PROM: Robert A. Rizzo, AselatanC City Manager
HY: Jerry H. Pulwood, Aaeeeament Revenue Coordinator
SUBJECT: Rawest Hor Continuance o! Pu611c Bsarina for
Reanoortionaeni o! Parcel MeD 9670 Within The
Sixth Street Industrial Park Retundino District
(B2-1R) Dv Resolution No. 87-188 Passim On
Reavoortionaent Reoort on Aoril 15, 1987.
• I Staft Se requesting that City Council approve the
continuance of Public Hearing, thereby granting Statt
additional time to research a 9lscrepancy in a previoua
reapportionment of eubiect parce la.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In fiscal year 1984/85 prior to the formation of Aaeeeament
District Adminiatratlon a reapportionment was incorrectly
done by our Consultants. In the allocation of unpaid
assessments against certain properties. The Revenue
Assessment Section Sn reviewing previoua apportionments came
across this discrepancy. Because of this Stsff Se
requesting that the Public Hearing for the reapportionment
of Parcel Map 9670 be continued until June 17, 1997 this
should allow staff sufficient time to resolve [his
situation.
asap rrspt ly Submitted,
~~~~y'
RAR : JHF : KMM/!/
/s~
•
•
May 20, 1987
FROM; Jerry Grant, Building Official~~,FO .
SUBJECT: APPEAL OP NOTICE AND ORDER OF BUILDING OPP[CIAL -
DANGERDUS BUILDING - 10155 24TH STREET
CITY OF RA.~CAO CtiCA~fONGA
STAFF REPORT
~~~ .trOy^
~~9,
/ ~
~.>
it
F'I ~ Z
19ii
TO: Mayor end Members o[ the City Council acting es Board
of Appeals
[. RECOMttENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council,
acting es the Board o[ Appeals, sustain the Notice and Order
o[ the Building Official and make a finding that the
building located et 10155 24th Street is a dangerous
building based upon the information submitted.
II. BACKGROUND: The building which is the subject o[ this
report was first brought to the attention of the Building
and Safety Division in early 1984. Operating under the
policy in e[feet et Chet time the owner(s) were advised that
it Ihn hn:lA: ..,. ....... .. •__-~_• ..- .
°- - w ~~~.+ aecureu arum entry, [net
the building might remain unless additional complaints
surfaced. The owners complied with that direction end,
until recently, the property was complaint tree.
In January of this year the property again came to our
attention, in conjunction with adjacent property, as
premises which were contributing to drug end public nuisance
problems o[ the neighborhood. Upon investigation, the
building was found to be no longer completely secured end
the roofing had deteriorated to a greeter extent than in
1984.
[n response to our request, the Foothill Fire Protection
District end the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station have
vrJVided ,Sefgil5 Of fnoi" COnCe.^65 :v:th the Subject
properties. Copies o[ that correspondence is attached.
The property owner in his appeal letters makes re[erenee to
e "Conditional Use Permit", He has verbally advised me that
his use of the terminology resulted from discuss ons with
Building Inspection Supervisor, James Schroeder in 1984.
The Planning Division has researched the record end found no
evidence of a Conditional Use Permit ever having been
issued,
/s7
Staff Report: 10155 2~th STREET
May 20, 1987
Page 2
S
The County used the building as a Dependency Prevention
Center for some time after city incorporation but the
building has been essentially vacant since that time. The
attached Planning Division memorandum outlines the issues of
the Development Cade that might impact future use of the
property.
In late March of [his year the Building and Safety Di visien
received a letter Prnrt! Mr. Rushes Wsrd, appaalir:g the NY. izz
and Order o[ the Building Official.
On April 15, the City Council determined that they
themselves would serve as a Board oP Appeals end set the
appeal date for this meeting. The owner has been notified
of the time and date in fae t, through staff error the owner
was incorrectly notified 4hat the hearing was to be held May
6 and subsequently was personally delivered notice of this
meeting.
It is the opinion of this office that the building in its
current state is a dangerous building in that:
s). The root of the building has less than 50 per cent of
the tire-retardant and weather resistive qualities of a
newly constructed building. •
b). The Duitdiag is dilapidated end lacks access to an
extent that it is a fire hazard.
c). The nuilding has been abandoned in excess oP six months
so as to constitute an attractive nuisance.
d). The property enables persons to resort thereto for the
purpose of committing unlawful acts.
he request that the City Council sustain the Notice end
Order of the Building Official and allow abatement action to
proceed.
JG:II
~J~
i. G+.~
• ~~~~.L..~~/~~O~NAN~H~/~~.1 9i~ 1 ~.f/ ~ !_: i~;i il/,'~
171619E7-4575
MP,MORANDQM
TO: Jerry Grant, Building Official - City of
Rancho Cucamonga
FROM: Lloyd H. A1~, Fire Marshal, Foothill Fire
District
r ~
SUBJECT: Abatement of Abandoned Buildings
DATE: January 16, 1987
On January lfi, 1987, inspector Mark Grisamore and myself,
conducted an on-site inspection of some abandoned
buildings located on the south side o£ 26th Street,
. east of Turner Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
In my opinion, the westerly buildings contain so much
combustible. rubbish tune waare anA ~ _~. ~~+
disrepair, that they are con s.idered a afire hazard.
It should be noted that we did have an intentionally
set fire this past summer in the building immediately
adjacent to, (west of ), the boarded up bui ldinq.
:Pith regards to the most easterly building, the present
condition of the building presents "obstructions that
reasonably tend to interfere with the operations of
the Fire Department" in the case of an emergency.
neither our personnel, nor the local residents should
have to continue to be exposed to the hazardous
ccndi *_ions presented by these dilapidated structures.
~ccordinq to the uniform Fire Code, Section 2.204,
w -'c a id i.lQS `ue ilia iu vio iacion of the lira
code andL recommend that they be demolished "for the
safeguarding of life and property from fire".
~J /
•- -
V~w~
Llvu L Sewe
Cwafb,..r~
cT.rl~ i. ens., n
D~bwW N. evn
P~h 1. Wridx
»7 xms
CbJ Yw,~~
Iw w.~v
I ~ ~ ~ _.
C77'Y O! RANCHO CUCAMONGw
row oww as IT, a.s. ~ 6ww.i. 91110. Ill ~~ 9l9.I el
January 30, 1987
Ruben Ward, etal
c/o Chsrles Ward
14775 Tacuba Dr.
Ls Mirada, CA 90038
9UBJECI': DAt4OHB(x18 BO1 LD [Nfl - WgBTBBLY 4 P8R1' OP LOT 9 AND LOT
LL BI.OCR S1 NO61'H CIICMt)11OA 1'01111 - ABRSS9OB PABCBL NO.
509-111-OS, IO13S 14TH 9T., RAIR;FD COCAI[MX7A
On January iS, 1967, this office conducted w lnrutigatl on of
the sDove retsranaed property to datermin• its complienc• with
the IInlform Coda for ADstemant of Danp rou^ Bblldtngs, adopted Dy
the Clty of Banoho Cucutrongs through Ordinance No. IRR.
At the completion at the tnvaatigntl as the property wsa found to
be dangerous for the following reasons:
e) The bullding roof has leas then 90% of the tire-resistive
and weather reaiating quell flea of n newly constructed
building.
D) The bullding fa dllspldated and lacks access to en extent
that has Daan datarnined to be a firs heserd Dy the fire
marshal.
e) Th• b~lding has Deen abandoned In ezcesa of siz months so
as t nsittute an attractive nuisance.
In edditioothe above, the property is located in the Lnw
Density Resl dentlel Zone. Therefore, reuse of the property for
any purpose, other than far realdentlnt development conforming to
the development codes; ie net pe r^~itt<d.
Considering the condition of the bullding there appears no
alternative Dut to require abatement Dy demolltlen na a dangerous
nuilding. Accordingly es en owner of interest in the property
described above, you nrs hereby notified to obtsin n^^easary
demolition permits and commence demolition within 4S days from
de to of this order and complete the work within en additional 10
days. In the event that the above directive la not domplied with
within the tlrlea specified, this offl ae will proceed to cease the
work to be done end charge the costa thereof against the property
or its owner. /(n O
Ruben Ward, slat
January 30, 1997
Pap 3
My parson harin~ record titi• or interest in the property may •
sppaal thin dotlaa and order proridad tM sppaal i9 made In
writing as proridad in tM DniCorm Coda for Abatement of
DanHeroua Hulldinp, 1979 Hdltlon, within 30 days of receipt of
this notlaa and order. Pailur• to sppaal will oonatltut• a
wairer of ali rights to M admlaiatratlra hurin~ and
determination of the matter.
it you hne any gasatlom or It tort her information Ia naaaesary,
pUas• Uai tru to eontaat thla otfiee.
9lncerely,
CpH9DN11'! DBVELOPIQIft DE9AE71tffirP
8elldta~ and eatety Dirialon
Jeer E. O~ie/~SI
Hut dio~ Oftlelal
.1HI1• i i
•
•
/ 6/
WARD'S INSURANCE
• AR i«...r u~.
St H~ Earaol
13303 SAN ANiO/il0 DR., SURE C
NORWALK, CAlli, 90630
PHONE (717) 863.3763
Mar. ch 2, 1987
Jerr7 R. Grant
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P .O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. ?1730
Subject: Building-Assessor Parcel No. 209-111-05, 10155 24TH
S*_., Rancho Cucamonga
Dear Mr. Grant,
We were in the process of obtaining bids to repair the roof
of the building at 10155 24TH St, after the unusually high winds
blew part of the roof away. We were also considering restoring
the building to its original use before we received your letter
2-5-87
In May of 1984, we complied with your request to board uo
the building at considerable expense.(Enclosed copy of letter of
5-10-84) We were assured by James E. Schroeder that by comolp-
• ing with your request, we would not have to demolish the build-
ing. We were also assured, that as Lono as lo~q as the family
owned the property, the building could exist under the condition-
al ^se permit. Now, in 1987 you tell u=_ that we pace to remove
the building and the building can't exist under the zoning re-
,c _
--._ _.._ _ _-. .....nq - cwvveii, .:mu we f~ei rnac
the City of. Rancno Cucamonga s:nouldvreimburse *_ne family for some
of tae expense. The building is no more a fire hazard todav(on 1•.•
an arsonist is a f'_re danger to tie building) cr has the zoning •
beer. changed since 1984. We are still calling for estimates to
refurb>_sh the building, and we plan to no Ld tie City to the dec-
larations ~~nade by mr. Schroeder.
We would, also, like to know the status of ihne adja ce r.t
Rodriguez grope rty, We boarded up our uuriuiny, eu is ~cu15..''
_ used without authorization, pr=venting ±ne pr=miles from
being used as a s'nooti nc galLe ry or a center f.or unlawful ac<-
wity. A contmpla*_ed park use for our p moerty would be a c=et-+r
for dr~~g traffic.
'' ~.... ~~ .. ... - spandance - ur Attornay uC Recocd,
Gilbert Gutierrez, Esq, atY3890 11Th St., Riverside, Ca. 92101
sfter :-3-H7,
Sincerely,
R+..4cro w.~C.
Ruben Ward.
/~, a
_ ~ ... r
.' ~- -r r~/_ ~~,MCI1'Y 0F~it~1~~CH0 CIICAl.~O1VGA
<.' i nl •. . 7c•I! nlr r.. •.:a i:i ~, e,q c iNc
~~'~':~'it:~- _ ~ ., rmY.~ inn u. )likd.v'-n. • w• , .. :nA r-
i~• ~ :c.l ,fl! .A1: K. .•YUn'. ,.,~6:HF.ta,..h•on .: ~.
., I'harlrx I. Ruyurl I I .lame. I'. 1'ni.t , ~ ~ • , •
_ ._ <ni .rc r.Awty(;t.hnrd \I. Irahl 1•hillip lr. Frhlu..o
May i0, 1984' n.;/' ~..a <,. ;,c... ry..tn .,/s .•i.4"4 i.n.S Yl,.., or s,q•;
,/ 1 r'!SS;y<Na/' Ssrn .~ 'it .~ uN•vl : ,y/</ :< b<a n•y ~G r'n<t
)i l)rC<{n tl. .('N/LC J16 InJ /~'.' 1 99.} eNd9 /~ .•YI(A
CERT~FIED N0, P-399-163-520
Mrs. Lupe Flin
10142 24th Street
Rancho Cucamonga, Cal iforr,ia 91730
"Letter of Dlotice"
Dear Mrs. Flin:
it has recently come to the attention of this Division that
the bui l.ding located at 1O15i 24th Street, which is apparently
owned by you, exists in a su s and ariil dange roue condition
due to general dilapidation, broken windows, abandonment,
structural damage to exterior and interior. This condition
constitutes the building being declared a public nuisance
under the provisions of the Uniform Code for the Abatement
of Dangerous Buildings. Please be advised that the current
and master planned zoning uses of the property permit only
single Family residences and that covmercial uses would not
be permitted. The structure in its present state constitutes •
a non-conforming use.
The current Codes and Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
require that we take certain steos to share rheas ,.....a:_:___
iuerefore, we urge you to contact our office prior to June 15,
1984 in order to avoid further actions,
Respectfully submitted,
CODPIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDP+G AND SAFETY DIMSIGN
.ferry R. Grant, Building Official y//y/6 j.
~.~ ~~~~ -
s James E. Schroeder I. u•>tr9orz hdN ;•>%r nys(n 'c
'-Building Inspeelion Supervisor r5,~,.e /1L ~.• Ir,v ;+. <. ,- i
..~
JES/kap lira a. ,' sTn;t 'NnT ~,n<' _~.\.1/A~
r l'JJ ~,~ ^/n'I Tu 6t .k'/~/utl/(,1 A• - 7 .. ~ r
(~'/r//~~ L:n'? KJSS,•X Y•.i 11 rl'r %r1~1 lv Na~~~~` Aac ';L n< i~..nr U:i) L/. in,.
5 (Nr7ur rl'!.I rncr H[. at"%w,:ch Y'.l •' {', ,v .« ~"'+~~~~~ive aawro (
rV .S~ I, /'anj 1; S(/!/i i~N!.~ wr:,' ~.:s /N. / I~pJ`li.rl ~Cp41Tv P•d.'If.• 1 ~N•c
VtY011A9RL1]R RUAD. tl1:ITEC • WNt OCYII'E NO%807 • RAtiI'NU('UCAMIL\, A, f;\1.1PII~~~IL,(91,7. Oy ~N19•x•I• i I •" ^
L4V "(Y •.~ I//tD/N/)JN4Llll[/1 J,Ja 4~NJ ytin+/ /V.~ q.'A ..•Y.r),, .'.,ew•
.~.-r~
~~-,:
• ` ~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pm, 0111a ev, e0l pq<M Cucfinenµ C~.kmu ii'.0 '
~ `~
.hr
thnnu 1. Scvv
""'"'"°'" March 9, 1987
~~Chffk, 1 duquer I:
DeEwN rl, drown
P,mfl~ 1. Warn,
JfnRr 14nr
Cm Na..f.~
IJIRII WWfIf11N
Mr. Ruben Wsed
19505 Snn Antonio Dr. Suite C
Norwalk, CA 90850
SUBJECT: DANGEROU$ BLDG. - 10155 24TH 9T., RANCttO CUCMDN(IA
Deer Mr. Ward,
We ere in reealpt of your letter of March 2, 1997. The letter
indicates that a number of clarificstlons are in order.
In the ti rat paragraph, you make reference to eonsiderationa of
restoring the building to [ts original use. However, in Mr.
• Sehroeder'a letter to Mra. Plin, it was clearly stated that
"commereinl uses would not be permitted" and that the "structure
constitutes a nonconforming use". Therefore my statement
regarding reuse of the property to not inconsistent with the
prior letter as intirtu fed in your letter.
In regard to assurance that the building would not have to be
demolished, it is true, (considering the condition of the
bui ;ding et the ttmaj, that demolitl on was not required provided
the building were properly secured end mai ntn[ned, and provided
no additional haxsrds or deterioration occurred.
At this time, the building is not completely secured, the rooting
has further deteriorated and the building has been determined Yo
be a fire Hazard because of the difficulty of gaining access for
[ire fighting.
We further acknowledge that the basic zoning has not changed
since 1984, however my statement regarding re uae of the building
bears upon discontinuation of a non-conforming use for a period
excess o! 180 days, as outlined in the attached excerpt from
the Development Code. Por the city to issue • permit for
refurbishing or reroofing would, In our view imply approval for
continuation which obviously is prohibited by ordinance.
Additionally, utilization of city funds in reimburaemant for
removal would be a gift of public funds for Denetit Jf. private
interests, and therefore Illegal.
In regered to your question concerning the adjacent property, we
are pursuing similar action with/ those pareela.
/t0
Nr. RuDen Ward
Nareh 9, 1987
peQe 2
Your letter was not clear it it wee intended to serve es an •
appeal to the notice and order. [t intended as sucA it should
have included the information outlined in Section Sal (s) of the
Uniform Coda for ADatemant of Danaeroua 8uildinaa (attached).
Accordingly, we will defer further action on this isaus until
April 70 to allow for filing of tae appropriate tntormat[on. [f
ws do not receive the naeeasarq information by that date, we will
presume your latter wa• not intended as sn appeal.
[ trust thla clarifies the clty'a position in the matter. If you
have need of furthae information please feel free to contact this
office,
Slncaref y,
CO]llaNl7'Y DSVBLOPAi~t't DBpAB'111Bttf
Buildinit and Safety Division
i ~~
Jar H. Grant
Bui dfn~ Official
JBCi: ! !
cc: Otlbert (lutierraz, 6aq.
•
/bS
EXCERPT FROM DEVELOPMENT CODE
D. Discontinwtidn of Nm-Cotttorm' Use. Whenever a ran-eontoeming lue hm
bean to a oemmg use a been discontinued to s .~tinucua period
of 180 days ar more. the famconformtrg uN shall rot ba rxasUDlished, end the
use of tM auuctlae a site tharaaftar slyll Oe in conformity with the regulations
for tta district in which it b located, provided that fhb aeetlan stall not apply to
non~otttorming dwellhtg unib. Discofltinwtion shell include termination of a use
regardlw of intent to resume the use.
EXCERPT FROM UNIFORM CODE
FOR
ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
11yplpT10a1 dp/
ChapMr 6
AMlAL
Oarlmal
aw. !1. (al pew el AppmL MY Parton wglad to IwvKe apdw
Staioa a0t Icl alaY eppMl fray aq ndKe apd arM w ap apgn of IM
offlelal an01e teh mda ~' fiery Y IM onb of IM aaildipp Of•
• atial•.ritaaappalpoptmwp:
I. A hadiy is IM ww6: "&fwe IM Bard of Appan of IM .....
d .............•
t. A eaplioe rladiry: "Appal o/ ............." pivinp IM names of ql
appe0aild parpcipmulp iA IMappeY.
1. A 6rlet tWemw twpN fanh IM I...1 c,,...... ~r ~.... ~ ;~„
Islamt m IM awwinpw IM lad ipvolvad a IM painand OrMr.:,
1, A Brief ttaleaw ip ordlMry sad <onaet INquaae of IM tittcific
ardor a anus prdwld, lopaher Mth anY ntmerml fun claimW to
tapport IM cowemgpt of IMappWm.
f. A brief ttmemw iu aMfaarY Bpd caecia Wlpuaae o! IM rrief
twyM std tlls realm wlry it d alaimpt IM lroleptd order d wisp
tlloaN M tavwead, momfiW d wherrustel aada.
6. lk daaataru of all panic IIa1Md u eppgWita end IMir official
rrmiliap addraaa.
7. 7M venfkmioe (by d0.1walYell ands pagly of l%rjury) of al IdN
aneapptWm w a IM Irwh of IM molten tlmea in IM appal.
7'M appal 111W M filed within a door (ran IM dolt of the ttrrin Of
taM orM w action of IM beudilM official: gwide0 a Thal if IM
lalildioa d ttaaywa u is taM coadlliall a to nmM II Im
dapsih
whaia 10 dew Erma IM e a 1 tgvia
~1 police and order ell 6"ml~its pi!&'hl.
Ib) h'atawlry of Appeal. Upa recgpl of any appal tiled panaull to
This udioa. IM Mildiry ollkial thW prow it m tM net rga4r or
tpeaiq IMgiry of IM Bwd o! Appeal.
Icl ltMeeaap aN MalMala AppM tw tterly M toe w pranicabN
anw reamry IM rripm appeal IM Beard of Appab tlWl fie a dolt.
ume, and phta Iw IM htagry of IM appd by IM pond. Sash date tMll
M nor Nta Ibaa 10 saw ear mon than d0 d.w trap IM due IM appal
wet filed with IM awWiry offlcW. Wgtua ndiaof IM lily and plan of
/~~ iM herirythW hpvMmMwt l0 daYt paw alMGaoflM heariry to
ors appaeaa eY IM ttteelary of IM Gard mho A angry a copy of
atcA ndiw to M dgirend m IM appghml pwtopalry w by mglint a copy
dltraof, lYanrye pfepaid, adMwted to IM appgWll n his aodreu rMwn
a IMappaal.
:VTEROFFICE ME 10 ;/~t~~/~.a»~[~~ ~
DATE March 11, 198'1 PHONE
FROM
• Hector
Rancho Guecra, Deputy Sheriff
Cucamonga Sheriff's Station ~
~j/v[bu~~
/'
'~'
TO Bohn A . Futsche[, Captain L~a
lwrNieo
Cwery of
Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station
SUBJECT NO RTX TOWN DPC CENTER
The purpose of Chia memorandum is to identify past, present,
and potential dangers and problems presented by the DPC
Cencec/old Theater located on 24th Street, east of Turner
Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga.
I have been assigned to ehe Rancho cucemonga Sheriff's
Station Ear the past four years and I am torten! ly assigned
as the Cang O[Elcer.
During my asalgnment at the Rancho Cucamonga Station L
have personally experienced numerous haze rds end problems
when conducting general law enforcement dudes and investiga-
• [ions in the area of Che bPC Center, i.e.:
1. Loss of suspe ets whsch fled into and/or concealed
themselves in the DPC Center.
2. vlac.d d..,,,t;..
incidents due to numerous 'aceas'of cover and concealment
for suspects.
J. The number of buildings and individual rooms that
are not visible to a passing patrolman presents an ideal
location for nereotle9 transactions and usage.
Personal inspection of the building and roams showed large
quantities of used/empty heroin balloons, hype needles,
and other narcotics paraphernalia.
d. The grafEitl on virtually every wall, primarily the
front of the main building facing 24th Street, indicates
that area has been deemed as the "Cucamonga Kings Gang"
turf end my _._an3! ezpe:icnce .... -yang member Contacts
there indicates . [hat those buildings ace their meeting
areas.
In addition co the previously mentioned officer safety
problems, personal inspection of rhos. bu:ldin s indicated
numerous health and public saEeey hazards, t.e.:
/W
Memo To John P. Futs<her, Captain
Dege Two •
1. The quantity and type of narcotics paraphernalia located
within ehe buildings could present any number of serious
health he zarda [or a child playing in the buildings.
2. The atrueturee ace in such poor and unstable Bond itions
that anyone walking through the buildings could be injured
by falling malarial and/or could fall through the deter-
iorated wooden floor, which in some areas has already
Eellen through.
7. Several of the buildings have been pat sally torn down,
leaving Dehind rebarb spikes, ^oards with rusted nails,
sharp edged cheat metal pieces, and broken glass.
0. The buildings have also become the local dump site
Eot all types of rafus• material.
In conclusion, my opinion ie Chet if the building ware
eo be removed, also removed with the buildings would ba •
the public health problems, oE[icer safety problems, criminal
and 9anq activily~ therefore, a)lowinq the property to
be put to a batter use for the community.
HG:amp
•
/~
WARD'S INSURANCE
AR Pww~ of i~..a.w.
• St Hail &)suf
17505 SAN ANTONIO DR., SURR C
NORWAIK, GIK. 90670
PHONE (Y17) 963.5765
March 27, 1987
Jerry R. Grant
Building and Safety Division
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Subject: Demolition order of building located at 10155 24th
Street, Rancho Cucamonga
Dear Mr Grant,
We wish to appeal the order for demolition of the subject
building. We disagree about the condition of the building We
feel that the building can be refurbished. We could put the
building to use for the "Public Gond" such as a youth club which
would include a gym, provide for youth boxing and for other
• youth activities Eor the minority kids of "North Town" who seem
to be always neglected.
We feel that we had an agreement that the conditional use
permit was good as long as the family retained ownership. The
o..~cacu La liuuo waue uy i•ic. aci~r order roar ine Dullolnq aid not
have to be demolished and the family would not be affected by
[he zoning was and interpretation of the 1984 order.
Please let us know when our appeal can be formally heard.
S(~in~cerely,
FuL~GN A h ~
RUBEN WARD
c.c. Gilbert Gutierrez
J
~/ /
~_. _
~'i i 1 ~ _ i '~-
CYIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i LL r,. ae. r w~, a.r. ctiw c.rrr.+nsq sn~,as
May 8, 1987
Ruben Nard
19505 San Mtonlo Dr., 8uita C
Norwalk, CA 90050
SDBJHCTs DA207HR008 BDILDIND - i.OT 11 AND NB947{RLY ~ PHBT OP I.OT
8, BI.OCH 61, 1R>81'R COC.11OtICiA 7t)11N - ABSHSBOR PABCHL N0. 400-111-
OS, 1O15S SeTB 97'RHSI', BANGS) GUCAI~H6A.
Dear OIr. Need,
You •re Aereby aotitled that a Rearing will be held Detor• the
City Gunoll acting u a Board of Appeal at Lloas Park Coasaun-ty
Geter, 4101 Beeline Road, Ranabo Cucamonga, Glltornfa, on the
40th day of OYy, 1104 at the bout of 4s40 P.01., upon the notine •
and order served upon you concerning the above propeety. You may
Ds present at the hearing. You may Da, but need not be,
represented Dy oounsel. You may preunt any relevant evldena•
end will De given full opportunity to cross-e=amine ail witnesses
testifying against you. Yms nrv .e;~~ee! :o... --- of Luupuenae to
compel the sttendanee o[ witnesses and the produetlon of books,
documents or other things by filing an affidavit therefore with
the Board of Appeals.
This notice is consistent with Section 004 of the "IIniform Cods
for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings a• adopted Dy the City of
Haneho Cucamonga and In aeaord with your ^ppsal of the notice and
order of the Building Otfielal.
Sincerely,
CChtig)c11 TY DHYHLOPL~T1' DHPAA4TROif
Bing end Safety W artment
v/
Jerry Grant
~Buil ng Official
JH6:I1 •
cc:611bert 6utierrea, 6aq.
176
~......
uo~ DMa"1 N. now /Yaq awl ca ~.w
D~o,L Sloe L1ule /. ie,/g r~Wl. w,yq trwK wr,rar
CITY OF RA.tiCHO CtiCA~iO\G~1
MEMORANDUM
GATE: April 20. 1987
T0: Jerry Grant, Building Official
FROM: Dan Coleman, Senior Piannerw
SUBJECT: 10155 24TH STREET - DANGEROUS BUIIPSNG
~?. [,.{ tln~r
~~ s ~'1
~ ~ ~, -
e' ~.
x ,y,~.
>' '~ x
~~ Z
~a--
Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the attached correspondence
regarding appeal of the demolition order of the building located at
10155 24th Street. Both letters from Rubin Nard of March 2 and March
27, 1987 refer to a "COnditional Use Peres/Y for the subject property.
I believe Mr. Nard mistakenly rcfermces a Cmditlonal Use Pen1t in
regards to a letter from Jim Schroeder dated May 10, 1984 which
correctly identifies the use of the building as a 'non-conforming
use". Mr. Nard seen to have construed this as approvai of a
Conditional Use Permit by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This 15 singly
not the case, as evidenced by careful reading of the May 30, 1984
letter.
• I Non-conforming uses are subject to the provisions of Development Code
Section 17,02.130. Whenever a non-conforming use has been discontinued
for a continuous period of 180 days or wore, the non-conforming use
shall not be reestablished. It is our understanding from your office
that the building has not bwn nrru~rnA .T.^.tc 1"77 Oi;cunLinuaiion rs
aen ned by the Development Code as Including terminatton of a use
regardless of intent to resume the use. In addition to non-conforming
use, it should be noted that the structure and site are also non-
conforming under the current regulations of the Development Code with
respect to development standards.
Section 17,02.130F, Rettoratlon of a Damaged Structure, further states
that "when the destruction exceeds SOS or the structure is voluntarily
razed or is required by law t0 be razed, the structure shall not 6e
restored except in full conformity with the regulations for the district
in which it is located and the nan-conforming use shall not be resumed".
I The property is presently zoned Low Residential which is intended as a,i
area for single family residential use with a minimum lot site of 7,210
j square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units par gross
acre. Attacned for your infornmtlon 1s a copy of Table 17.08.030, Use
Regulations for Residential O15tricts. In his letter of March 27, 1947,
Mr. Ward states his desire to provide a youth club within ':he
i building. A youth club would be defined as a Public Facility by Section
~ 17.02.140 which requires a Condltlmal Use Permit in the L~v Residential
015trict. A Conditional Use Permit requlrcs review and approval by the
Planning Camm!sslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
7~
Neiao to Jerry Grant
April Z0, 1987
Psge 2
•
In conclusion, it would appear that Mr. Hard erroneously lnterprcted
that the City had granted approval of a Conditfonal Use Penait by letter
of Mley 10, 1984. Refurbl5hnent of the building for a youth club would
require Planning Coawlsston approval of a Conditional Use Penatt.
OC:ns
cc: Brad Buller
•
~~
. :~
r-- .-.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ra., oma m. e"x, a.oan c~..~. c.Hwm. vnx.:l,n seva:l,
April 16, 1987
~--
Ruben Wg~d ~ ~~~~/
13505 8"an Antonio Dr., Suite C
Norwalk, CA 90880
51YBdECT: DANGERDOS BUILDING - LOT 11 AND WESTERLY 4 PEST OF I.OT
r 9, BI.OCR 81, NORTH CDCANIONOA TOWN - ASSH9SOR PARCEL N0.
209-111-08, 10158 24TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAh1ONGA
Deer Mr. Ward,
I
You are hereby notified that a Ae wring will be held before the
ity Council acting as a Board of Appenls at Lions Perk Comdtnity
~~~er, 9181 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the
/i8t ytlay of Msy, 1987 at the hour of 7:30 P.M., upon the notice
d order served upon you concerning the above property. You may
• be present nt the hearing. You mny be, but need not be,
represented by counsel. You may present any relevant evidence
end will be given full opportunity to Grose-examine all witnesses
testifying against you. You mny request issuance of subpoenas to
compel the attendance of witnesses end the production of honk.
- - ,,, uii:er :rings oy sling an affidavit therefore with
the WBoard of Appeals.
This notice is consistent with Section 802 of the "Uniform Code
[or Abatement o[ Dangerous Buildings as adopted by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga end in accord with your appeal of the notice and
order of the Building Official.
Sincerely,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Building and Safety Department
/ujj~
erry{'R,Grant
Building Official
JRG:II
ec :Gilbert Gutierrez, Esq. / ~~
c~.r.r.
rw LMEo.W N. ai•we leaTo/ Kiq cy r....
nm"u L Sbu: mrfe 1. aiquM O P~m.~ 1, WAS: [qua" AL Wun,m~o
CITY OF RA.\CHO CCC~1~fOtiGA
STAFF REPORT
~~~itr
t~ --,
~.
Y, A. >
i.
ti r _
i i
~ ~ Z
19't
DATE: April 15, 1987
TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager
PROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official
SUBJECT: APPEAL HEARING - DANGEROUS BUILDING, 10155 24TH ST.,
RAN(,'HO CUCAMJNGA
1. REOO81offd4DATION: Thst the City Council consider
des gnation o an appeals bosrd or hearing a:eminer(s)
in appeal of the Notice and Order of the Building
Otticinl in the matter of abatement of a dangerous
building at IOISS 24th Bt.
li. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Building end Ssfety Division
has Deen involved n abatement proceedings against two
owners of properties located between 24th Street and
Humbolt Avenue east of Turner Avenue. The owner of
property designated as 10155 24th has appealed the
Yotice and Order of the Buildin¢ Official. ao,. aiian
th:s :s the first time an action o[ this type has come
before the City Council, a policy decision is needed.
Under the Uniform Code [or Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings, es adopted by the City, the Council has
several options as to how such appeals may be heard:
a) The city council, as a body, may serve as the Board
of Appesis;
b) The City Council may appoint 5 other persons other
than employees of the city to serve as a Board;
e) The Council may appoint one or more hearing
examiners to hear the case; o:
d) The Council may appoint one or more of its own
members to serve es hearing examiner(s).
Staff Report - 18155 24th St.
Page 2 •
([n the case o[ hearing examiner(s) the process is
somewhat delayed because of reports to De returned to
the city council for ratification before a decision
becomes final.)
This matter will be brought before the city council at
the nf.y 8th meeting for designation oP a Rearing body
or afPicer and [or setting of a hearing date.
Respectfully suteni tted,
Jer ~ an
Building Offieial
JRG:II
•
7s
r
lJ
CITY OF RANCHO CCCA~IONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 1987
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FRAM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Alan Marren, Associate Planner
,~`>=,j~~` y
~~~
x \_
z
F ~ Z
19T
SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS - SUBAREA 8 - Review
o ex s ng area an use an eve opmen standards
requested by Lhe City Council
I. RECOMiENDATION
Tne Planning Comzdssion recomwends that the existing regulations
for the development of Subarea 8, adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway,
remain as recently adopted and that staff be authorized to require
"line of sight" studies of all developments in this area.
II. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: In September of 1986, the City Council
a p e ex ns ve amen n s to the Industrial Specific Plan It SP ),
as recommended by the Planning Commission. During Council review,
^i --d - Ina ~i,miyt ui land use rrem Heavy
lndustrlal~to General industrial adjacent Lo the 1-15 Freeway. The
concerns related to a perceived loss of employment potential due Lo
the change and also to limitations on heavy industrial use.
The City Council did not wish to hold up the process and approved
the ISP mmendments as recommended by the Planning Coamission.
However, it was requested that Subarea B adjacent to the I-15
Freeway be reviewed with these concerns in mind. The pity Council
also desired that the issue be brought before the Chamber of
Commerce for their analysis and input.
The Chamber of Commerce reviewed the adopted land use amendments
for Subarea 8 and found Chem to be appropriate and suggested that
a "Line of sight analysis should be required for each use lace te4
adjacent to this freeway". This pal icy would ensure shat any
storage/warehousing operation is appropriately screened from the
public view.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
15P lYoendments - Subarea 8
May 20, 1987
Page 2
•
The Planning Coonission
staff's recaawendations
Chamber of CoaaN!rce,
auuapany this report.
Commission and Chamber
action is necessary.
Res tfully submitted,
Brad 8111
Ctty Planner
reviewed and agreed with the Chamber's and
on April 22, 1987. The existing standards,
and Planning CoAission recosnendations
If the Council concurs with the Planning
of Coweerce recoaaKndations, no further
BB:AM: ns
Attachments: Subarea 8 Map
Exlsttng Subarea B Standards
Chamber of Coaawerce Recom~endaLiuns
Planning Cawtssion Minutes, April 22, 1987
•
•
~77
0
i
LL
~ ti~
~$
~ ~
~~~f
~ ,~,..~
i -~
9
E 3a
a ~8~
,~
~ t
~3~a I'~$
~ks= '-~
7~1~ i i ~It
Ri•
.$
_j
~2
~t~
i
~ ~1
~ $r
~ ~?
F
~ 5X
E
g.
i~
a
e =i
l
/ J
;V-57
Exbtln0 ~tnMnd~ a~ nc~nty am~ndud by Cky CouncN
SUBAREA 8
Land Use Designation General Industrial
Primary Function This area functions Co provide for General Industrial
activities and to assure for a tra nsi ti an area from the
Neavy Industrial category located north of this
subarea. North of Arrow and west of Milliken, the
industrial uses should be allowed to continue and
expand with all service according to the development
standards of the plan. Suoarea 8 extends north of
Arrow approximately 1000' east of Cleveland to the east
Plan boundary including a portion south of Arrow along
the eastern plan boundary.
Permitted Uses Custom Manufacturing
. -
Light Manufacturing
Research Services
Public Storage
Light Nholesale, Storage, and 0lsiribution
Medium Nholesale, Storage and Distribution
Agricultural/Nursery Supplies and Services
Autusotlve/Light Truck Repair-Minor
Autonotive/Truck Repair-Me~ar
Building Contractor's Offices and Yards
• Building Maintenance Services
Building Supplies and Light Equipment Sales
Business Supply Retail Sales and Services ~
Business Support Services
Communication Services
-ca ii ny end urinzing tsta olistmencs
Laundry Services
Recreation Facilities
Repair Services
Administrative civic Services
flood Control/Utility Corridor
Conditional Uses Medium Manufacturing
Administrative and Office
Professional/Design Services
Animal Care
Automotive Fleet Storage
Automotive Rental/Leasing
Automotive Service Station
Convenience Sales and $ervlceS
Entertainment
Fast Food Sales
Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Services
Fcod and Beverage Sales
Heavy Equipment Sates and Rentals
Medical/Health Care Services
Personal Services
/~9
IV-54
SUBAREA 8 (Continued)
Petroleum Products Storage
Public Assembly
Public Safety and Utility Services
Religious Assembly
120' Right-Of-Nay - Day Creek Boulevard
Milliken
100' Right-Of-Way -Arrow (No median on Arrow)
Ettwanda
Rochester
88' Right-Of-Nay - Jersey
9 I i
u' ~.~ u• rr v u• ~.
a~ u.
to fl. RON
gccess and Circulation
/o vIV-55
SUBAREA 8 (Continued)
66' Right-Of-Way - All other local Streets
n• . n•
~~ n.
pn.w
M1n1s+u~ Parcel Size
Setback Requtreaatnts
(Measured free ultt-
awte face of eurD)
Landxcaping RequlreaN•nts
One-Half (1/2) acre
Average
landscaping
Day Creek Blvd. 45'
Milliken 45'
Arran 45
Rochester 45'
Etlwanda 45'
Jersey 35'
All Other Local 25'
Streets
12S of net lot area
Parking Bu11d1ny
25' 45'
25' 45'
25' 45'
25' 45'
ZO' 35'
15' 25'
~_
•~
Performance Standards No1se: The amxlauar allowable noise level of any use
sTiaTl-not exceed 75 Ldn as awwsured et the lot line of
the lot containing the use. Mhero a use occupies a lot
abutting rosidenttally zoned land, the noise level
sMll not exceed 65 ldn as neasurod at the caaean Sot
line. Mo1se caused by arotor vehicles and trains aro
exeagted fray this standard.
Yibratlon: All uses shall be operated so as not to
9ene~ vibretlon discernible without lnstrueents by
the averao_e persons beyond the lot upon which the
source is located. Ytbrotian caused arotor vaAtcles,
trains, and teagarary canstruetlon or deaplltlon is
ezeapted fra~a thla stanGrd.
/ ~ 56
r1
U
SUBAREA 8 (Continued)
Petroleum Products Storage
Pu611c Assembly
Public Safety and Utility Services
Religious Assembly
120' 0.ight-Of-Way - Day Creek Boulevard
Milliken
100' Right-Of-Way - Arrow (No median on Arrow)
Etfwanda
Rochester
88' Right-Of-Way - Jersey
r
3
u• u• u' u• ~ ' u rs
•~ 11.
u n, wow
[:J
Access and Circulation
/~~55
SUBAREA 8 (Continued) •
Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addition
comp once w s an r s, all uses shall
be operated so as not to emit particulate matter or air
contaminants which an readily detectable without
instruments Dy the average person beyond aqy lot line
of the lot containing such uses.
Odor: All uses shall De operated so as not to emit
~Eer causing unpleasant odors which arc perceptible
to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot
containing such uses.
Numi di ty, Heat and 61are: All uses shall be operated
so as no ot~pro ud-ce uF~iidlty, Deat, glare or high-
intenslty illumination which is perceptible without
instruments by the average person beyond the lot line
of any lot eontalning such uses.
Special Consideration Due to the potential conflicts between uses within this
subarea and the uses d thin the Industrial Park
Category o1 ad,~aeent Subarea 6 8 7, building setback
tram abutting property for Medium Manufacturing and.
greater intensity shall De no less than 45'. Class C
Perforwsnce Standards of the adiolning Minimum
Impact/Heavy Industrial area (Subarea 91. allow
existing businesses and future Industrial uses which
produce noise, particulate matter and air contaminants,
vibration, odor, humidity, heat, giare or high
intensity. Uses sensitive to Lhese conditions, such as
precision manufacwrtng or office projects, should
consider these factors prior to location in the
vicinity of Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial property.
Both the potential park site location and fin station
location arc shown to indicate approximate location.
Development within 600' of the I-15 Freeway shall have
outdoor storage areas completely screened from view
along the freeway. Because of the existing rail
service, users with rail service needs are permitted
S~~fiL ~AEFIJW within tree area west of Milliken Avenue.
~aQl11RL~M~ARLj To preserve and enhance the linage of the community
special conslderetlons shall be iven Lo the quality of
site design, archltecturc, and landxcaping of all
properties ayacant to the I-15 Freeway. Attractive
screening of outdoor work, loading, storage areas, roof.
and ground mounted equipment fro significant freeway
points o/ view shall De required.
/~3 Iv-5T
(rancho (acamon~a
i CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
7365 CARNELIAN STREET, SUITE 130
eebruary 23, 1987 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
TELEPHONE: 714/987.1012
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: erad Buller, City Planner
9320 Baseline Road
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject: iSP Amendments - Sub-area p8
Dear Brad:
The Economic Development Committee has now reviewed the
draft amendments furnished by your office several times, and
finds concurrence with the amendments as currently proposed.
At the January meeting of the EDC, discussion centered
around what types of screening techniques should be required
for new uses located adjacent to the Devore Freeway. The EDC
• feels that these future uses should be adequately screened
from view, inasmuch as this corridor is an important visual
entryway to Rancho Cucamonga. The EDC feels that a visual
line-of-sight analysis should be required for each use
____ __ __ ___.._ ~„ ,.r, ,,,, ..c ........v~wu iivw Lirc
~restern-most^travel lane of~the freeway.
Pertaining to permitted uses, the EDC feels that, white
storage uses along with warehousing may not be the ultimate
employee-intensive kind of land use to be realized, this area
may see interim development of uses li::e these, at least
until such time as the regional shopping center and other
developments o£ that character become reality.
^:~c EDC supports the amendments as presented, and will be
available at future public hearings before the Planning Commission
a.-.d Ciry Council to so recommend.
'Phank you and your staff for your assistance in our review
Truly yours,
RA HO CVCAMONGA CNAMHER
CO[+IME E ~
ary tchell, Chairman
p,E/co is Development Committee
cc: Bob Dutton /0 7
GRAFT EitERPT PLAININ6 CpNISSIDN NIMUTES - APRIL 22, 1987
N. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS - SUBAREA 8 - Review of existing •
Subarea an use an deve opment Stan ar s requested by the City
Council.
Brad Buller, City Planner, presented the staff report.
It was the consensus of the Comission that the existing Industrial Specific
Plan provisions for Subarea 8 are appropriate. Additionally, the Conwission
concurred with staff's recoetxendation relative to line of sight studies for
developments adjacent to the I-15 Freeway.
/gS
U
•
Date:
To:
From:
By:
May 11, 1987
CITF OF R~1SCH0 l'CC ~3f0~G1.
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and City Council Members
~Cu.tto it
~~ ~ .~ ~,
z
z 1`.. `:
,~
= ~ s
Z
19'C ~
Historic Preservation Commission
f'~l
Paula Pachon, Community Services Coordinator
Subject: The recognition and designation of the George
Klusman House as a Historic Landmark within Rancho
Cucamonga.
(City Council Agenda - May 20, 1987)
RECOMMENDATION•
It is the recommendation of the Historic Preservation
Commission that the George Kluaman Houses located at 9113
Foothill Boulevard, ba designated by the City Council as a
Historic Landmark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACKGROUND:
During January, 1987, an application was Piled with the r;f..
p roposinq Historic landmark designation Por the house located
at 9113 Foothill Boulevard, known as the George Klusman
House. At the January, 1987 Historic Preservation Commission
(HPC) meeting Staff and Commission members discussed the
feasibility of designating the House as a Historic Landmark.
At this meeti.nq, Chris Westaan, Assistant Planner from the
City's Planning Division, informed the Commission that a
com.-nercial office building was being proposed at that
location. Mr. Westman indicated that the developer, the
Deckk Development Company, was aware of the Commission's
interest in the House, and might consider donating the House
to an individual who would then be responsible for relocating
the structure.
A public hearing was scheduled for the February ;:PC meatinc
tc writinue the discussion of historic landmark designation
and possible relocation of the George Klusman House. At this
meeting the developer, Mr. Daniel Richards, was present and
informed the Commission of his intention to build a
commercial office building at the current Location of the
Flusman House. Mr. Richards indicated that ha would be
~dillinq to donate the House to an individual who would be
able tc pay relocation costs to their own property site,
/&G
George Rluaman House
May 11, 1987
page 2
The Commission decided at this meeting to continue the public
hearing at the March 5th HPC meeting and to investigate the
possibility of working with the developer to advertise the
availability of the House to anyone that would be able to
move and restore it.
To this end, the Commission worked with the peckk Development
Company in publishing an article in The Daily Raoort which
appeared in the February 14, 1987 edition. As a result of
this promotion, the Deckle Company received over twenty
responses. After screening the respondents, two qualifying
parties were identified, Chatfey Community College, and Mr.
and Mrs. James delay, the current owners of the Cousins
House, also known as the Christmas House, a previously
designated local landmark.
The Ileley'e having formulated a specific plan of action for
the moving, restoring, and use of Lhe House were determined
by the Dsckk Company as being the moat appropriate recipient.
During the months of March and early April the Ilsley'e
worked with their contractors , and the Deckle Company to
determine the apecifica concerning the relocation of the
Rlusman House. .
At the end of April a meeting was held at the Deckle
DevalopmanL Company which was attended by the developer, Mr.
and Mre. Ilsley and their general contractorw. rrnnn.+sal........
conics ana city Staff, to discuBe iaeuee pertaining to the
relocation of the George Rluaman House.
At this meeting the Ilsely'e expressed their concern over
cost estimates (see Attachment 1) they received for
relocating and renovetinq the Rluaman House. In addition,
since the Ilaely's hed planned to live in the House while
they renovated it they were concerned about the requirement
oP a certificate of occupancy. The Ilsely's indicated that
it was financially infeeeible for them to bring the House up-
to-code by making all the required renovations to the House
prior to their occupancy since this would necesa itate using
outside labor sources.
It was decided that the group would meet agnin on the
'"--•:nq Tuaeday, April 28th, to allow the Ileely'e to
determine whether, given the cost est imatea, the project
would be feasible for them.
•
/ ~~
•
•
George Klusman House
May 11, 1987
page 3
At the April 28th meeting Mrs. Ilsely indicated that given
the cost estimate for relocating and renovating the Klusman
House that they would have to withdraw from their proposal
for the project. (See Attachment 2).
The group then discussed what should be done from this point.
Dan Richards, of the Deckk Company, indicated that their
deadline in which the House would have to be moved was still
three months. Zt was decided, as an initial step, that City
StaPP would recontact the list of individuals who originally
called the Deckk Company in February and expressed an
interest in relocating the Klusman House. _
During the week of May 4th City Staff contacted all
individuals on the original list of interested parties (see
Attachment 3). Staff indicated that the Klusman House was
again available and reviewed the time frame in which the
House would have to be moved, the estimate of coats
associated with the move and renovation, and the restrictions
placed on the transfer of the House. To date, four
individuals have expressed an interest in relocating the
George Klusman House and have been re tared to Lhe Deckk
Company for further information. Those interested include:
Sohn Valentovia
Chuck ?".organ
Don Tackett
iim magi
At the May 7th HPC Meeting Commission members met and
discussed the developments concerning the relocation and
3esignation of the George Xlusman House as a City Historic
Landmark. At this meeting Dan Richards indicated that
although the original proposal for the relocation of the
Klusman House did not work out, the Deckk Company was
agreeable to continue working with the HPC to identify an
individual who could and would relocate the George Klusman
House within the given time frame.
it was stressed, however, that their
House moved was still three months.
that given this time deadlinn and the
_ •2d `or relocation of the house,
not~be realistically feasible.
deadline for having the
Mr. Richards indicated
ooet estimates they Y.ad
this project may just
/~ 0
George Alusman House
May 11, 1987
page 4 •
The Commission acknowledges the efforts, support, and
community spirit that the Deckk Company has demonstrated over
the pant several months. The Commission however, feels that
the George Rluaman House is historically significant to the
community. It ie one of the few remaining craftsman style
homes remaining within Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, the
Houas was built by George Rlusman a prominent local resident.
Most importantly, due tc the historic aignilicanca of the
Houas, and given their charge frog City Council the
Commission feels it is their responsibility to recommend to
the City Council that the Gaorga Rlusman House be designated
a City Historic Landmark.
Therefore, this recommendation comes belors City Council
acknowledging both the historic aigniiicanca o! the George
Rlusman Houas and the •lforts and support that the developer,
the Deckk Development Company, has ahoan in working with the
Historic Preservation Commission to attempt to save thin
important community structure.
HPC:PP:ba
cc: File
r~
LJ
•
" /
• ATTACHMENT 1
ICLIISMAN PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
I. Pre-Move and Move
Architectural Design S Development $ 5,000
Grading and Excavation 4,500
Underground Trenching (Utilities) 5n0
Diy up street (Utilities) 2,500
New Parking Lot (paving/2 Approaches) 3,000
House Moving & L't it iti.es Move 20,000
Foundation 12,000
Rough Carpentry 3.000
Subtotal $45,500
II. After Move
Paving b Walks 000
$ 3
Stone Chimney and Porches ,
3
000
Plumbing ,
Electrical 3,000
Finish Carpentry 4,500
Subtotal $1-g Opp
• I. T_. Renovation
Stone Facing--Foundation
000
$ 3
Landscaping ,
5.nnn
Strip Wa11s/Paint 1,500
Framing (closets, walls) 4~ 00
Doors (including new front door) 7
000
Flcars ,
000
2
Kitchen (new floor, cupboards, misc.) ,
2,500
9athroom (new floor, fixtures) 1,500
Side Porch 3,000
Paint Exterior S,o00
Furniture 5,000
Labor
15.000
Subtotal $53,000
Total $316,50C
NCTE: :lone of the above includes general contractor Lees at
approximately 20$+, and does not include any Paes imposed
by the city and utilities.
//~
Al'fACHMEYT 2
April 29. 7987
M:. Dougai_ Agar.
Stephen Deaiels
8331 IItica Avenue, Suite 200
Rancho Cucaaongs, CA 97730
S object: 3lusman House Relocation
Dear Mr. A:sa:
Enclosed are our cost estiaates for relccatlag and
renovating the filuaaan House. Nona oP tae cost
estiaates =aclude general contractor fees at approx±-
matel7 20:-; nor do the;j ±rc iude and cit7 or •
utility co.?and fees. The bottom liar indicates tca `.
the proJec: 1s not ecoaomicaiiy feasible for us.
We gave toe vrafect cur best ePPort and are very
scr:y tha: the results cculA ~~t *~ p ,;~„_,e,
/Very t~uly ycurs,
Jay and J~ce~ y
•
C4R1STtAS HOUSE Bed b Brealdaat Im ~9240/Ar Avenue, Rancho Cuamon8a. California 9I7J0 'y i1J/980.8J50
i ATTACHMENT 3
NAME PHONE
MELONI JURAN (714) 949-6614
KELLY HURT (714) 868-5259
LAURA ZINGG (714) 946-2760
DEBBIE (714) 627-7670
JOHN VALENTOVIS (714) 980-6436
JIM ROY (714) 988-6891
ivRY ZING (714) 946-2760
CHUCK MORGAN (714) 987-1311
SANDY FRIEND (714) 624-5095
DON TACKETT (714) 629-1547
BARBARA DAY (714) 985-0966
MARY LANE (714) 957-1777
JERRY YOUNG (Chaffey) (714) 987-1737
BECKY SCHMIT (714) 987-6422
MARY TRALRILL (714) 596-6760
MRS. WEED (Chaftey) (714) 984-0102
SHARON BUTS (714) 981-1675
RANDY RIDER (714) 947-1006
DORSS BREWHAKER (714) 985-2299
TIM OLAGI (714) 955-2135
PAUL LOGAIE (71d) 874-1888
CLAUDE MCGUY (714) 950-2557
.
ED MERRIGAN (714) 945-3663
MARSHA HANKS (714) 966-7621
JAY ISLEY (714) 833-9661
~ / g~
RESOLUTION NO. 87-7efti-1 q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CZTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING
THE GEORGE RLVSMAN HOUSE LOCATED AT 9113
FOOTHILL BOVLEVARD AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC
FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC
LANDHARK
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City oP Rancho
Cucamonga, hae adopted Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code relating to historic preservation; and
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation
Commission has investigated the historic significance of the
George Rlusmen Mouse and hae held public hearings concerning this
site in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code relating to historic preservation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows:
The City Council Linda and determines that the Gsorge
. Klusman House located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard, has met the
criteria established for designation as a City Historic Landmark,
and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic
Preservation Commission, designates this site as a city Historic
Landmark.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May,
1987.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk _
/93
~~
•
CITY OF RANCHO C[;CAYIONGA
STAFF REPORT
p`U Np~,
Q ~ \y
>? A
H~i ~ Z
.. >
DATE: May 20, 1987
TD: Mayor a:d Members of the City Council
FRCM: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
SCHJECI': FIBCAL YEAR 1987-88 8[8X'ET hORRSEIOP APD BEARING DATES
1971
R'L[RIs Council set butlget workshop dates of June 2, June 9, erd
June 117 erd Public Bearings for June 17, and June 24.
The Fiscal year 1987-88 8atlget will be forwarded for your redid on
Friday, May 22, 1987. The Following schedule is reocmme7ded Eoc workshops
and hearings to allay for dieasesion and adoption of the Rsdyet prior to
July 1, 1987:
June 2, 1987 - 1st hbrkshop - ovecvid of the total budget
ae submitted.
June 9, 1987 - 2nd hbrkshop -Detailed diea:seion regarding
budget requests end futile.
-'^.^.'- '-'-.-:°'• - ::o.~oinn, - Leuriiw aiscueeion regarding
budget requests and funds and finalization of
budget for adoption.
June 17, 1987 - 1st Public searing regarding proposed butlget.
June 24, 1481 - 2nd Public Bearing aril adoption of budget.
All workshops would begin aC 6:00 p. m., and conclutle by 9:00 p. m., when
possible.
Respectfully submitted,
~ ~
Lauren Wasserman ~~~
City Manager
LW:JB: cv
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOP
REDEVELOPMENT AGENC'
STAFF REPORT
GATE: May 20, 1987
TD: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Jack lam, AILP, Deputy Executive Director
BY: Olen Jnnes, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRIBUTION TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN CONNECTION WITH THE REFINANCING OF A
PORTION OF THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT gREA IN RESPONSE TO
CONTINUING INTERPRETATION OF THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 1986.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution making a contribution to the Rancho
ucamonga a evelopment Agency in an amount not to exceed E100,000.
BACKGROUND: On May 6, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
approved the refunding of its outstanding 1984 Tax Allocation Bonds. On that
same date the City Council, as the appropriate legislative body, approved the
refinancing.
ANALYSIS: Because of technical restrirtions in the Tax Reform Act of 1986, no
mere than 2% of bond proceeds can be used to pay for issuance costs. In order
to comply with this requirement, the Agency had planned to use the baiance of
the reserve fund from the previous issue to pay any amount over the 2%
limitation, a common solution to this problem.
'di t`ie tL< loot neck, Lire in~erprecive report on the lax He to rm Rct was
pu bt fished, which eliminates this method of paying for issuance casts, In
order to overcome this obstacle, the Agency's Bond Counsel has proposed the
following solution.
The Reserve fund balance from the 1984 issue which would have been used to pay
costs of issuance, will instead be used to repay the City a portion of the
amount of the obligation the Agency owes the City. The City will then
contribute that same amount to the. Agency for the purpose of assisting the
Agency in the refunding. This method allows the Agency to achieve the same
results while complying with the technical interpretation of the Tax Reform
4c t.
There is no additional cost to the City under this method.
nos pec tfui iy s bm~~i ij~aed~, i ~~~~ii
Jack Lam, ~~"~'A• .-- '
Deputy Executive Director
JL:OJ:kap
Attachments: Re solut
~ 9s
lAW oFFIC E4 CE
BEST,BEST 4 KRIEGER
May 15, 1987
MEMORANDUM
T0: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY
FROM; BOND COUNSEL
RE: CONTRIBVTION OF THE CITY COUNCiL TO THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO PAY A PORTION OF
THE COSTS OF ISSUANCE OF THE AGENCY'S REFUNDING TAX
ALLOCATION BONDS
The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency is
proceeding with the issuance of its $9,300,000 Rancho
Redevelopment Project Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds, 1987
Series A for the purpose of refunding its 1984 tax
allocation bonds and Eor the purpose of repaying a portion
of an obligation of the Agency to the City. Because of
technical restrictions in the Tax Reform Act of 1986, no
more than two percent of the cost of issuing the bonds may
• be paid Erom their proceeds. In order to comply with this
requirement, it had been planned to pay excess costs of
issuance from moneys in the reserve fund for the 1984
bonds. This is a technique that has been used in many
financings of this nature in response to this reatr;ntinn
ii,i~ week, However, an interpretive report on the Tax Reform
Act was released by the staff that drafted the Act. Among
many other items, the report includes a footnote that makes
it clear that moneys from a prior bond issue that is
refunded may not be used to pay excess costs of issuance.
Accordingly, in order to comply with this
restriction, we are now proposing thaC the moneys that would
have been used from the 1984 bond issue to pay costs of
issuance be applied instead to reduce an additional amount
of the obligation of the Agency to the City. We would then
propose that this money 6e applied as a contribution by the
City to the Agency Eor the purpose of assisting the Agency
in paying costs relating to the issuance of the bonds.
while the same economic result is achieved as was
originally intended, and thus neither the City no: the
Agency will be required to use separate cash reserves to pay
these costs, as a legal matter, the money that will be used
for these costs is money of the City and 'hus the
transaction will not run afoul of the interpretive
/9l~
3t -
RESOLUTION NO. 87- ~q Q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAKING A
CONTRIBUTION TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $100,000
WHEREAS, this City Council has heretofore approved
the refinancing by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
(the "Agency") of a portion of the Rancho Redevelopment
Project through the issuance 6y the Agency of its Rancho
Redevelopment Project Refunding Tax Allocation Bonds, 1987
Series A, in an aggregate principal amount of $9,300,000
(the "Bonds);
WHEREAS, this City Council wishes to assist the
Agency in paying certain costs in connection with the
issuance of the Bonds in excess of those permitted to be
paid from the proceeds of the Bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND
ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Cont[ibution to A enc This City
Council hereby agrees to a vance as a contribution to or on
behalf of the Agency to assist in financing costs of issuing
~::c ^-- - r omo„.~L uu~ Lu exceeu piJu,uuU, cne trnal amount
to be determined by the City Manager in consultation with
the Underwriter Eor the Bonds and Bond Counsel to the
Agency.
Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution Shall
take effectimme3Tately upon option.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of May,
1987.
AYES:
NOES:
ABj LIY L :
ATTEST:
y~ City Clerk
F,IB i90
Mayor
-1- ~~U