The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987/08/19 - Agenda Packet ~. n / / [/\ 4 (~ i ~~ . I / ~.. i ~ ~1 `---1 (~~-' ( , 4 ~ ~~l,Y %i ~° ~1 j'./i i~ ~1 i~, /' i .~` Ul_... 1, . ,_, j p ~.~-~' ` ~ June 3, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA REOEV ELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Nednesday, June 3, 1981, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Present were Agencymembe rs: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Bu quet II (arrived at 1:05 p,m.), Jeffrey King, and Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Executive Director, Lauren M. Wasserman; Deputy Director, Jack Lam; legal Counsel, John Brown; Assistant Secretary, Beverly Au thelet; RDA Analyst, Olen Jones. Absent was Agencymeinber: Pamela J. Wright. . t e ~ : R B_ CONSENT CALENDAR B1. Approval to receive and file current Redevelo omens. Anenrv lnvnc rmonr nc nn rr as of May 21, 1987. - ' MOTION: Moved by King, seconded 6y Stout to approve the consent calendar. Motion carried 3-0-2. + .. « . . C. PUBLIC HEARINGS Ii0 ITEMS SUBMITTED • • r • • x D. STAFF REPORTS Di ar. I4UTI DPI: Moved by King, seconded by Brown to approve Lhe loan, otion carried 3-0-2. (Buquet, Wright absent.) RDA Minutes June 3, 1987 Page 2 « « « « x x (Bu quet arrived at 7:05 p.m.) * * x x k x Dz report presented by Olen Jones, MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve execution of said Agreement. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Wright absent.) x x« x x x 03. APPROVAL Of THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987/88. Lauren Nasserman requested that the Redevelopment Agency adjourn their meeting to a joint meeting with the City Council to review the RDA budget on June 9, 1987 at 6;00 p.m. ACTION: Consce nus of the Agency to do sa. x x « x x « x « x + x x E. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Wasse nnan requested that the RDA adjourn to a closed session following the City Council meeting to reconvene on June 9, at 6:00 p.m. at the Neighborhood Center fora joint meeting with the City Council. MGTION: Moved by 3rown, seconded by King to adjourn to a closed session to reconvene on June 9, at 6:00 p.m. at the Neighborhood Center for a joint meetinn with the City Council. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Wright ahsent.l Meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authele! Assistant Secretary MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Brown to approve preparation of a feasibility study. Motion carried 4-0-I. (Wright absent.) June 9, 1981 CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA JOINT RDA AND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meet;n9 A. CALL TO ORDER The adjourned meeting met at the Neighborlrood Center, 9791 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called tp order a= 6:10 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Courc it members and Agencymembers: Deborah N. Brown, Jeffrey King, Charles J. Buquett tt, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Absent were Counc it member and Agencymember: Pamela J. Nright. Arriving late at 6:25 p.m. was Councilman and Agencymember Charles J. Buquet I1. * R * * w i B. STAFF REPORTS B1. STAFF OV ERV IEN OF 1981-88 BUDGET Engineering Budget - Presentation made by Russell Maguire, City Engineer. Mr. Maguire went over the list of capital improvements for Lhe 1987-88 Budget- Blane Frandsen, Sr. Civil Engineer, presented an overview of the streets, railroads, and traffic improvements. ****** (Councilman Buquet arrived at 6:25 p.m.) ****** Paul °ni, ,,, cr. Civil E.^.gineer, presented a traffic report. Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer, presented a report on the beautification projects. Russell Maguire Went over the master drainage plan. Joint RDA and City Council Minutes June 9, 1987 Page 2 •f~Rff Mayor Stout called a recess at 7:35 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 7:50 p.m. with all members of the Council present except for Cau ~ilwoman Nri ght. •++.a• Mayor Stmut asked Mr. Magulre to address the issue regarding new staff versus the projects and what would happen if development should stop. Mr. Maguire responded to the request, After all the presentations by members of the Engineering Department were made, Council expressed its appreciation for the magnificent job in the capital improvement budget. There being na further questions or discussions, the meeting was continued to Monday night, June 15 at 8:00 p.m. RDA NU06ET SECTION The RDA budget section was presented by Jatk Lam, Deputy Director. After the presentation the Agency asked staff when they thought the executive management for the redevelopment would become full time, Mr. wasse rman stated that a report would come back to the Redevelopment Agency sometime in September. • . D. ADJOURNMENT There being no further questions by the Age ntymembers the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. to a closed RDA and City Council session nat to reconvene this evening but for both the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to continue this meeting Monday evening, June 15 at B:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet As sis*.a nt Sec rotary June 17, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Joint Redevelopment Agency/City Council Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A joint meeting of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, June 17, 1987, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Choirman and Mayor Dennis L. Stout called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Deborah N. Brown, Pamela J. Wright, Charles J. 8u quet II (arrived at 7:20 p.m.) and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were AgencymemLa rs: Deborah N. Brown, Pamela J. Wright, Charles J. Bu quet it (arrived at 7:20 p.m.) and Chairman Oenn is L. Stout. Absent was Councilmember: Jeffrey King. AbS ent Was NgencymemDer: Jeffrey King. Also present were: Executive Director/City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Legal Counsels, John Brown and Ronald Van Blarcom of Best, Best and Krieger and James Markman, City Attorney; Deputy Director/Community Development Director, Jack. Lam; Assistant Secretary/City Clerk, Beverly Authelet; Senior RDA Analyst, Linda Daniels; RDA Analyst, Olen Jones. • + . x • + B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Chamber of Conmerce to make presentation to Captain John Futscher of the Sheriff's Department. 62. "rre se ni anon of commemorative p'ns to Lity Councii and City Manager by Mike 0irksen of Cha ffey Joint Union High School District. Redevelopment Agency Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 2 * * * * * k C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Approval of Minutes: March I6, 1987 March 24, 1987 April 7, 1987 April 15, 1987 C2. Authorization for Agency staff to execute Certificate of Conformance to 1) Dr. Eb be, located at 9765 Louise Way, Rancho Cucamonga and 2) Brian Bolda located at 9776 E1 Pa seo Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. idOT[ON: Moved by Brown, seconded by Buquet to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). .. + • ~ e D. STAFF REPORTS D1. AGENCY ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING REPORT TO COUNCIL PREPARED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AM ENOMENT N0. 1. RESOLUTION N0. RA 87-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT RGENCY iici+irJi•iiTiiiiG inE it ErO nT iU In[ 6111 6UUN6lL hUH REO EV EL OPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 1 FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO THE CITY COUNCIL MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to accept the report and approve Resolution No. RA 87-007. Motion carried 4-0-1 !King absent). ~ . + + . + 02. AUTHORIZATION FGR AGENCY TO EXECUTE MEFIDRANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH CHA FFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by 'Wright to approve the Memorandum of Understanding with Cho ffey Joint Iln ion High School. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King ahsanC). a • + ~ x r 03. AUTHORIZATION FOR AGENCY TO EXECUTE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH ALTA COMA FL EMENTARY SCIIOOL DISTRICT. MOTION: 'loved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve the Memorandum of Understanding with Alta Loma Elementary School Dist riot. Motion carried 4-0-i (King ahsent). • x e e x Redevelopment Agency Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 3 E. ADY ERTISED PUBLiC NEARINDS E1 Mayor and Chairman Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Mayor Stout announced that the record con to inzJ the following documents: 1. An affidavit of publication from the Daily Report, a newspaper of general cirtul at ion of a notice of the public hearing published on May 23, ,tune 3, and June 10. 2. A true and correct copy of Notice of Public Nearing which Was mailed by certified mail to the last known as sessee of each parcel of land in the project area. 3. An affidavit of mailing to property owners in the Rancho Redevelopment Project and a list of those property owners to whom a notice was mailed by certified mail. 4. An affidavit of mailing to affecting taxing aqe nc.es and a list of taxing agencies to whom the notice was mailed by ~e~ti `ied mail. 5. Minutes c `he meeting ofl the Agency and Counc ;~~ on May 20, including item 2 and 21 ~.: ~cti vely consenting to Lhe public hea ri. and setting the Lime and place of the public hearing. 6. A copy of the -eport prepared pursuant to Section 33352 The California Health an, Gafet~ Code which contains as attachments the Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 for the Rancho Redevelopment Project, the environmental impact report on the Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1, and the relocation plzn adopted by the Agency for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. 7. The preliminary plan prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the Rancho Redevelopment Project and adopted by the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission on April 8, 1987, 8. A copy of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. 9. A copy of the preliminary report and Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1. I0. A copy or the report to Ciiy Council prepared by t'r,z Aga~;cy ar~d ti uii miii.t2d to the City Counc it on November '.8, 1981. 1'. A copy of all correspondence received during the fiscal review process or. tha Redevelopment Plan Amendment Na. I. 12. R copy of the Agency's response to the correspondence received during the fiscal review process prepared on Redevelopment plan Amendment No. 1. 13. Cor'1 i~t of lnte rest statement from all Agency Counc it membe rs. Redevelopment Agency Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 4 Executive Director, Lauren Wasserman, in roduced Bryce Russell of Gunn, Russell, Co penhaver and Company, Inc., who made a presentation regarding the Redevelopment Plan and the Environmental Impact report. Mayor Stout asked the City Clerk to read any written communications received in favor of the proposed Redevelopment Plan. City Clerk Au Chelet stated that several had been received. The first one from the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation, Who had requested that the letter be read into the record as follows: "Dear Dennis I understand that the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency will be considering various amendments to the City's Redevelopment Plan at a special meeting on June 17, 1987. The Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Conmun ity Foundation discussed the general concept of the ROA plan and unanimously voted to suaport the amendments recommended by the City. The entire Boar? wish ~~s to emphasize its strong support for the use of RDA funds for facilities which are to be "shared" among the entire community and which ul Lima tely benefit all residents of Rancho Cucamonga. On behalf of the entire Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board, I would like to extend to you and the City Counci lmembe rs our support of the Redevelopment Plan and our hope Lhat all future RDA funds will be allocated toward those projects which benefit the entire community. Sincerely, Jeanne S. Barton, Cnair, Rancho Cucamonga Lommum ty rounaatlon. Other letters received: Rick Gomez, 6656 Dakota Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701; A. H. Reiter Development, Newport Beach California; Foo :hill Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga; Department of Transportation, Flood Control, the Planning Division; Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce; Or. Raweevan Ka no kveeha ya nt (known as Dr. K) Mayor Stout then asked that all persons wishing to speak in favor of the Redevelopment Plan come forward. Addressi nn Council were: Tennis Michael, Chief of the Foothill Fire Protection District and on behalf of the Board of Directors, spoke in favor of the plan amendment. Andy Swanson, Ontario Librarian, spoke in favor of the projr^t. Mayor Stout asked the City Clerk to read any written communications received in opposition to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. Redevelopment Agency Minutes June 17, :987 Page 5 City C1 erk responded that two letters were received. The first one, a letter of protest from Parker b Covert, Attorneys for Central School District and Etiwanda School District. The suhj ect was impacts on the school districts, the absence of conditions of blight within the project area and certain other objections. The second letter of opposition was from 'Western Center on Law and poverty, Inc. The subject was certain objections to the amendment based upon impacts on families and persons of low and moderate income. Mayor Stout asked for those Wishing to speak in opposition to the proposed Redevelopment Plan o~ those having questions regarding the Redevelopment Plan, Lo come forward to address the Council. Addressing Council were: Clayton Parker, Attorney for Central School and Etiwanda School Districts requested staff to prepare an agreement that 50% of the funds that no rmaily flow to the school district boundaries be paid to each school district. He also felt that the E.I.R. did not address the impact on the schools and how it would be solved. Frank Costello, Superintendent of Cucamonga School District, also voiced opposition to the plan. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor and Chairman Stout closed ao to the pity uou nc it and nedeveiuNnenL Fuuii~ iie,i any,. Discussion followed 6y Agency and Gounc it members. R F.S OLUTI ON N0. RA 87-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE kANCHO CU CAMON GA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CERTi FYING THE FINAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT R EPOP.T FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 1 FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA MOT10N: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to apprn ve Resolution No. RA 87-008 certifying the find 5u pplemenL to the Environmental Impact Report. Notion carried 4-0-1 !King absent). RL.I VL~l111DN ND. RA tj, -DDJ A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CU CP.MON GA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING TIIE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 1 FOR THE RANCHO REO EV EL OPME NT PROJECT AND RECOMMrND1NG ADOP PI ON BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE GITY OF RANCHO CU CnMON GA MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Wright to ap prow Resolution No. RA 81-009 approving the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1. Motion carried A-0-1 ("inn absent). Redevelopment Agency Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 6 .«**** Mayor Stout announced that all business before Lhe Agency had been concluded, he would entertain a motion for adjournment. *.**+* MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to adjourn the Redevelopment Rgency Meeting. Ma tion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). The meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. .. * * * * Mayor Stout announced that the Council was still in session although the Agency meeting was adjourned. The next item of hu siness for the City Council to adopt a Resolution certifying the final E.I.R. RESOLUTION N0. 87-289 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 1 FOR THE RANCHO REOEV ELOPMENT PROJECT MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to adopt Resolution No. 87-289 certifying the final E.I.R. with respect to the Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 for the Rancho Redevelopment Project and making certain findings. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). Councilwoman Wright stated that it appears the Council was rubberstamping something, she explained that they had extensive negotiations and consideration of this item in the past. * * * * * . D2. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING TI1E RANCHO REDEVELOP MENT PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 1. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 316. ORDINANCE N0. 316 (First Reading) AN DRDiNAN f.F OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO Ci1CAMUN GA, CALlFURrv IA, AR PROV iNG AND AOOPIING REOEV ELuPM'eNi PLAN AMENOME NT N0. 1 FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT MUT10N: Moved by Stout, srco nded by Brown to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 316 and set second reading for July 1. Motion carried 4-0-' (King absent). k * * * * * Redevelopment Agency Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 7 E. ADJUURNN ENT xxxxxx Mayor Stout called a recess at 8:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. ..+... Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Assistant Secretary 6 City Clerk June 23, 1987 CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEY ELOPMENT AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Ad Sou rned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the Redevelopment Agency/City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, in the Lions Park Lommun ity Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Agency/Count ilmembers: Deborah N. Brown, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, and Chairman/Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Executive Director and City Manager, Lauren M. Nasserman; Deputy Director and Community Development Director, Jack Lam; Sr. RDA Analyst, Linda Daniels; ROA Analyst, Olen Jones; and Assistant Secretary and Oe pu ty City Clerk, Debra Adams. Absent was Agency/Count ilmember Charles J. Buquet II. 1 1 R R 1 f 6, CONSENT CALENDAR nl n....-....-, a .a....a ,nog oo n_~:1^-t......._, n.-_.... o.. d..-f .. ..,.,,. . .... ... .. .. ... ~ .,.~~~. ~~...y.~...~ ..~... 82. Approval of Resolution relating to salary ranges and benefits for all full time and part time employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for fiscal year 1981-88. RESOLUTION N0. 87-327 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCI NOING RESOLUTION N0. 86-188 RELATING TO SALARY RANGES AND 6ENEFITS FOR ALL FULL TIME AND PART TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 33. Approval of adoption of fiscal year 1987/88 budget; Article %I IB nunru urint.innt iimi t; 1987l8R xnldry SC hedui e, RESOLUTION N0. 87-328 A RESOL UTIGN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S BUDGET (& .. TA%, ANC OTHER S^EC IAL PURPOSE FUNDS, RND ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1981-88 City Council Minutes June 23, 1987 Page 2 RESOLUTION N0. 87-329 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, LAL[FO RN [A, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT PURSUANT TD ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIS STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). • • t C. CONSENT ORDINANCES C1. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL APPROYING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 1. Assistant Secretary/Deputy City Clerk, Oebra Adams, read the title of Ordinance Na. 316. ORDINANCE N0. 316 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 1 FOR THE RANCHO REDEV ELOFMENT PROJECT MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to adopt Consent Ordinances. Motion rar riad 4-0-1 lRumiet. ahcentl. • x ~ t • x D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC NO iTEMS SUBMITTED i w ~ x ~ E, IO ENTIFICATIONS OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Ccu ncilmember Brown requested that discussion of workshop regarding Victoria Lakes be placed on the July i, 1987 City Council agenda. .: • .. x City Council Minutes June 23, 1967 Page 3 F. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Wright to adJourn to executive session to discuss potential lawsuits with school districts, not to reconvene tonight, but to reconvene to regularly scheduled meeting on July 1, 1981. ResDec tfui ly submitted, Debra Adams Assistant Secretary/Deputy City Clerk Approved: July 1, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Regular Meetin A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, July 1, 7987, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was Called to order at 1:02 p.m. by Chairman Bennis L. Stout. Present were Agency Members: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Bu quet I[, Jeffrey King (arrived at 7:08 p.m.), Pamela J. Wright, and Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Assistant City Manager, Robert Rizzo; Deputy Director, Jack Lam; Sr. RDA Analyst, Linda Daniels; Legal Counsel, John Brown; and Assistant Secretary, Debra Adams. Rhsent: Executive Director, Lauren M. Wasserman • e ~ x • « B. CONSENT CALENDRR e u:.,..a... M. C tOA~ Inn nh aFC nr1 MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Stout to approve item Bl. Motion carried 4-0-1-1 (King absent, Buquet abstained). 02. Approval to receive and file current Redevelopment Agency Investment Report as of 'une 24, 1987. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Stout to approve item 62. Motion carried M1-0-1 (King absent). 63. Approval for staff to pursue land acquisition for offramp at I-15 and Foothill Go uleva ri. ML'i ION: Mn ved by Grown, seconded by Stout to approve item 63. Motion carried n _ii _.__n+) 94, Approval to execute amendment with Redevelopment Agency Plan Amendment n nsul tant Gunn Russel Co penha ver, Inc. to increase contract amount by $10,000 due to extended ne9o tiations with taxing entities. Co oncilwoman Wright quns tinned why another $10,000 was needed. Redevelopment Agency Minutes JuIY 1, 1987 Page 2 Mr. Lam stated that this 510,000 had to do with protracted negotiations, where the other 510,000 had to do with supplemental EIR and the plan amendment. He also indicated that it could go toward litigation purposes if necessary. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve item B4. Motion carried 4-1 (Wright). 85. Approval to prepare and following properties: Address: 9791 Louise Way 8641 Andover Place 1954 Etiwa nda Avenue 10722 Rrrow Route 9166 E1 Pa seo Drive 8685 Base Line Road 11079 Canterbury Court 9830 Al lesandro Court 7268 Parkside Place execute Certificates of Conformance for the Owner Ms. JJoseph ine Ashburn Mr. Carl Grillo Mr. Donald J. Glover Mr. Gregory Oe bin Mr. Wilco ii. ioung Dr. Ra veewana Kanokvechayant Mr. Mark C. Ste ppan Mr. Mark C. Steppan Mr. Dennis C. White MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Buquet to approve item B5. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). * * * * . * NO ITEMS SUBMITTED NO ITEMS SIIBMITTEC C. PUBLIC HEARINGS D. STRFF REPORTS E. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to adjourn to closed session to discuss lawsuits on the Redevelopment Plan Amendment. Meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. P.es pettfully submitted, Debra Adams Assistant Secretary Approved: July 16, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ;net on Wednesday, July 15, 1987, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base line road, Rancho cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Present were Agencymembe rs: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Bu quet lI, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, and Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Rohert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager; John Brown, Legal Counsel; Beverly Au thel et, Assistant Secretary; Brad Buller, City Planner. .4bse^.t were: Executive Director, Lauren M. Wasserman; and Deputy Director, Jack Lam. B, CONSENT CALENDAR B1. Approval of Minutes - May 20, 1987 (Bu qu et ahsent). 62. Approval to adopt the annual Statement of Investment Policy for the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. 88. Set joint public hearing With the City Council for August 6, 1987, 7:OJ p.m., at the Alta Loma High School Auditorium for purposes of receiving public testimony in connection with the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Rancho RedeVelnmm~nt Plan. MOTION: Moved by Kiny, seconded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar. Mo Ciao carried unanimously 5-0. « • « :. . Redevelopment Agency Minutes July 15, 1987 Page 2 C. PUBLIC MEARIN6S NO ITEMS SUBM ITTEB D. STAFF REPORTS .:.. • + E. AOJOURNNENT Legal Counsel, John Brown, announced that it was necessary for the Agency to meet in closed session pursuant to government code Section 54956.9 Subsection (b)(1) because the Agency bares a significant exposure to litigation by the affected taxing agencies including the Central Cucamonga and Etiwa nda School urscrrcts wno nave cnreacened lawsuit yr sec elide ivuendmenc iiu. i iu iiie Rancho Redevelopment Project. Also regard irg litigation by Western Center On Law and Poverty vs. the City of Rancho Cucamor ga. The Agency recessed to closed session at 7:10 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:29 p.m. with all Agencymembe rs present. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to adjourn to Thursday, August o at 1:00 p.m. at the Alta Loma High School Auditorium for a joint City Council and Redevelopment Agency meeting regarding the Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authel et Assistant Secretary MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to accept Vineyard National Bank as the servicing agent for the business property improvement loan program and authorize staff to begin preparing the necessary loan applications and advertising of the program. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. CITY OF RANCFIO CUCAMONi REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: AUGUST 19, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jim Hart, Treasurer BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Di recto SUBJECT: Receive and Fite Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Investment Schedule Status Report as of AUGUST 22, 1987 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY INV STM N SCHEDULE STATUS REPORT PURCHASE MATURITY INTER E3T INSTITUTION ORTE DATE AMOUNT RATE LAIF 02/28/86 as needed 5.000.000.00 07 Boa GREAT WESTERN 02/21/87 11/27/87 1,188,291.25 06.200 Great Hestern 07/07/87 06/30/88 500,000.00 06. ~0 First Trust Bank 04/07/81 10/05/81 500,000.00 05.500 Royal Oaks 5 d L 11/19/86 11/19!87 100,000.00 06.750 Nestport Savings 1D/20 /86 10/20/81 100,000.00 06.900 Security Federal 10/20/86 10/20/87 100,000.00 06.600 Eastern SBL 10/20/86 10/20/87 99,000.00 01.000 Mercury SdL 04/24/81 10/21/d1 100,000.00 06.450 Mutual S6L 01/23/81 01/25/88 99,000.00 O6.SD0 Secure SSL 04/24/87 10/21/81 100,000.00 06.600 County Savings Bank 04/24/87 04/25/88 100,000.00 07.000 Lincoln 5 8 L 12/19/86 12{21/87 99,000.00 06.400 Glendale Federal 12/12/86 1?/11/87 100,000.00 06.500 First Federal Sav Bank 04/30/87 04/29/88 100,000.00 06.950 Centnripn Savings SO/?1/85 10/27/81 99,OOO.C0 06.600 Bel Air 58L 09/05/86 09/08/87 100,000.00 06.750 Cal America 58L 05/20/87 05/19/88 99,000.00 08.375 Encino S8L 05/20/87 11/16/87 100,000.00 07.375 Great Meste rn S8L 01/12/87 01/07/88 500,000.00 06.000 Great Mestern 58L 03/13/87 12/08/87 500,000.00 06.200 Pacific Savings Bank 06/15/87 06/13/88 100,000.00 08.600 Community Bank 12/29/86 12/29/81 500,000.00 06.150 Nat Bank of Catalina 07/07/87 07/06/88 100,000.00 06.650 Southwest Bank 07/13/87 07/13/88 200,000.00 07.750 Pacific Coast 58L 10/02/86 10/23/87 99,000.00 07.250 Bank of America 07/20/87 10/19/87 500,000.00 06.100 Bank of America 07/20/81 10/19/87 500,000.00 06.100 Irvine City 58L 05/22/81 05/23/88 99,000.00 07.250 LAIF 08/28/86 as needed 27,984,000.00 07.294 Downey S 8 L 04/29(87 10/26/87 100,000.00 06.500 FIRST CA SA BANK 10/31/86 12/03/87 100,000.00 06.875 Commerce Savings 11/06/86 11/09/87 99,000.00 06.625 Calif Fed S8L 11/07/86 11/09/87 100,000.00 05.950 Bank of pne rica 12/03/86 12/03/87 500,000.00 05.750 New America Savings 12/03/86 12/03/87 99,000.00 06.625 Trans Pacific 12(12/86 12/19/87 100,000.00 07.125 Bank of America 07/21/87 10/19/87 100,000.00 06.100 G ib ratter Savings 02/06/87 01/29/88 998,176.80 06.300 T Note "1 Far Nest 5EL 02/19/87 08/19/88 100,000.00 07.100 BANK OF AMERICA 05/21/87 08/25/81 1,740,903.00 06.300 FEDERAL FARM CREDITS OB/03/81 02/01/88 500,000.00 01.100 FEO ERAL FARM CREDITS 08/03/87 111/02/87 500,000.00 06.950 As of 08/12/87 Grand Total 44,802,371.05 •t T Nn eoe r_haen_d a• a holm fha .~~~.i ~_., , ~ eL~,. They are quo ted and traded on the bas is of yield to maturity. Note 2: All investments are Certificates of Deposit unless otherwise noted above. a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Ldm, AICP Deputy Executive Director BY: Olen Jones, Redevelopment Analyst SOBJECT: Approval of an Agreement for Cooperation Between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Chaf Eey Joint Union High School District. RECOMM@IDATION: Authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreeme~ Cooperation with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. BACRGRODND: At [he Redevelopment Agency meeting on June 17, 1987, the Agency approved a Memorandum of Understanding with the Chaffey Joint Union High School District which outlined the terms of the mitigation of financial impact of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment on the District. Based on the terms of that Memorandum of Understanding, the attached Agreement was developed. ANALYSIS; The attached Agreement for Cooperation details the terms of the mitigation of financial impact of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment on the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. These terms are consistent with [he Agency approved Memorandum of Understanding. Ali pledged payments are explicitly subordinated to any existing or future Agency bonded indebtedness, and thus will not affect the Agency's ability to sell bonds. The agreemenC also stipulates [hat [he terms of this settlement fully mitigate any impact of the Redevelopment Plan upon the District. Rcopectf ally -su bmi,ted, Jack Lam, AICP Deputy Executive Director COPY AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION BETWEEN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. PARTIES AND DATE. 1.1 This Agreement entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this day of August, 1987, between the CRAFPEY JOINT UNION RIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public school district ("District"), the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body ("Agency") and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City"). 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Agency is presently undertaking a program under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seS.)• for the redevelopment, ieFiauuiuy and redesign of cercaan noncontiguous and blight- ed areas within the City with stagnant, improperly utilized and unproductive land known as the Rancho Redevelopment Project (the "Project") and requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the City of Ranche Cucamonga pursuant to Ordinance No. 166 adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on December 23, 1981, which author- ~ All subsequent references, unless otherwise no'ed, are to the California Sealth i Safety Code. izes the redevelopment of an area within the territorial limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. 2.2 Agency has proposed the adoption of Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan for the Project. 2.3 District is an affected taxing entity which provides public education services and opera tea and maintains public school facilities which are of primary benefit to Agency's Project Area or the immediate neighbor- hood in which such project area is located. District had general purpose property taxes levied on its behalf by the , County of San Bernardino on all or any portion of the pro- perty located in the Project in fiscal year 1986-H7. 2.4 The California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000, et se~C.) autho- rizes redevelopment agencies to pay to any taxing agency with territory located within a project area other than the community which has adopted the project, any amounts of money which in the agency's determination is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment eaused to any taxing agency by a redevelopment project. 2.5 District has previously submitted to Agency and City its data and findings regarding Project's possible future financial impacts and City and Agency have -2- S determined that the Project may cause financial burden or detriment as defined by Section 33012 to District. 2.6 District and Agency wish to enter into an Agreement between themselves to provide mutual aid and assistance in the redevelopment of certain areas of City through the construc[ion, reconstruction and rehabilitation of public school facilities in order to Facilitate rede- velopment within City and to further provide for the cooper- ation of District and Agency in carrying out redevelopment activities and otherwise alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to District by the Project. 2.7 District and Agency recognize the need to provide adequate public school facilities to serve the Project and have determined that such facilities are of primary benefit to the Project and the immediate neighbor- hood in which the Project is located and that there are no other reasonable means of financing such public school facilities. 2.0 Agency has found and determined that it would be appropriate to alleviate financial burden or detri- ment caused to District by the Project, if any, by assisting District with money to construct, reconstruct and rehabili- tate public school facilities which are of primary benefit to the Project and by otherwise assisting in the financing of District's facilities which may be of primary benefit to Agency's Project. -3- NOW, THEREFDRE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 3. TERMS. 3.1 Definitions. "Agency" shall mean the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. "City" shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation. "County" shall mean the County of San Bernardino, a political subdivision of the State of California. "District" shall mean the Chaffey Joint Union High School District, a body corporate and agency of the State of California. "Project" and "PCOject Area" shall mean the specific redevelopment project area and redevelopment acti- vities described in the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, as amended. 3.2 Funding of Proiects for District's Benefit. On or before June 30, 1990, Agency shall pay to District not less than One Million Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,050,000). Such funds shall be deposited by Agency in its Special Fund, shall be designated "Chaffey Joint Union High School Fund" (the "Chaffey School Fund") and shall be -4- used by Agency upon District's request to pay the principal of and interest on loans, money advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by Agency or District, with Agency's consent, to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the folloaing District projects: (a) The construction of a tennis court at Etiwanda Higb School; and (b) The construction of a swimming pool at Etiwanda High School. On or before June 30, 1994, Agency shall pay to District not less than one Million Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,050,000). Such funds shall be deposited by Agency in its Special Furd, shall be designated "Chaffey Joint Union High School Fund" (the "Chaffey School Fund") and shall be used by Agency upon District's request to pay the principal of and interest on loans, money advanced to, oc indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by Agency or District, with Agency's consent, to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the following District projects: (a) The construction of a tennis court at Rancho Cucamonga High School; and (b) The construction of a swimming pool at Rancho Cucamonga Hlgh School. -5- On or before June 30, 1996, Agency shall pay to District not less than One Million Three Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($1,375,000). Such funds shall be deposited by Agency in its Special Fund, shall be designated "ChafEey Joint Onion High School Fund" (the "ChoEEey School Fund") and shall be used by Agency upon District's request to pay the principal of and Interest on loans, money advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by Agency or District, with Agency's consent, to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the following District projects: (a) The construction of bleachers at Rancho Cucamonga Righ School. Such funds may be commingled with such other Funds as may be deposited by Agency in its Special Fund. In each fiscal year thereafter, such funds as may remain on deposit shall continue to be used Eor the purposes set forth herein so long as any such funds remain on deposit in the Fund. 3.3 Allocation of Special Taxes. District shall be allocated, in addition to the portion of taxes allocated pursuant to Subdivision (a) of Section 33670 and Section 3.2 of this Agreement, all oe any portion of the tax revenues allocated to Agency pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 33670 attributable to increases in the rate of tax imposed for the benefit of District, which levy occurs after -6- 9 the tax year in which the ordinance adopting the redevelop- ment plan becomes effective. 3.4 Alternative Uses Of Funds. District's facilities and projects otherwise required to be funded 6y this Agreement may be modified in whole or part by the Agency upon request of the District, if oticerwiae permitted by law. 3.5 Subordination of Agency Obligations. The indebtedness of the Agency under this Agreement shall be deemed not to be a first pledge of Tax Increment received by the Agency pursuant to Section 33670~b). The indebtedness of the Agency under this Agreement shall be subordinate to any existing or future pledge of Tax Increment to bond- holders or the holders of other instruments of indebtedness; provided, however, the Agency agrees not to incur indebted- ness when it is reasonably foreseeable that such indebted- ness will impair ite obligations to district hereunder. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give the District the right to approve Agency indebtedness. 3.6 Taxes to Be Used for Purposes of Health i Safety Code Section 33334.2. Tax Increment collected for and allocated to District under the terms of this Agreement shall be set of those funds deducted for purposes of comply- ing with Section 33334.2. District's portion of the tax increment allocated to Agency shall constitute a receipt of Tax Increment by Agency for the purposes of California -7T- T Health b Safety Code Section 33334.2 and appropriate por- tions of such funds shall be deposited in Agency's Low - and Moderate-Income Housing Fund for purposes of complying with California Health 6 Safety Code Section 33334.2. 3.7 Term. This Agreement shall become effec- tive upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting Amendment No. 1 to the Project. In the event the Amendment joss not become effective Eor any ~-reason whatsoever, this Agreement shall not become effective unless and until such Amendment becomes effective. All rights and obligations under the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall terminate ahen the Agency's right to claim and receive tax increment pursuant to Section 33670(b) ceases. 3.8 Modification and Termination. If after this Agreement is executed, State enacts laws or policies in conflict with all 9r any portion of this Agreement, Agency and District may mutually agree to excuse performance of all or any portion of this Agreement by Agency or District. In the event any section or portion of this Agreement shall be held, found oc determined to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason whatsoever, the remaining provisions shall remain in effect, and the parties hereto shall take further actions as may be reasonably necessary and available to them to effectuate the intent of the parties as to all provisions set forth in this Agreement. In the event the Amendment does not become effective Eor any reason whatsoever, or in -8/- ~/ the event the Amendment is held, found or determined to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason whatsoever, this Agreement shall terminate automatically. 3.9 Mutual Assistance and Community Uae of Facilities. District will support the Amendment and will assist the Agency in the planning, financing, acquisition, construction and maintenance or operation of redevelopment activities undertaken by Agency under this Agreement within District in accordance with applicable state and federal law. District and Agency shall supply to one another such information and reports as from time to time either may . require to undertake their respective obligations. District . and Agency shall cooperate fully, wherever possible, in making the facilities financed under the terms and condi- tions of thus Agreement community facilities fully available for use by all residents of the City. The City will provide agreed-upon high priority use of the City auditorium to be built at Central Park by the end of fiscal year 1997-98 for both Hancho Cucamonga High School and Etiwanda High School use, and District shall cooperake fully with City's Community Services Department to prepare an annual schedule of events for use of the auditorium at the beginning of each school year following the construction of the auditorium. -9- /~ 3.10 Settlement and Release. Ry this Agree- ment, the parties intend to resolve all differences with respect to the Redevelopment Plan, the Amendment and the Project. Therefore, upon execution of this Agreement, District shall forthwith withdraw any and all objections to and any and all legal proceedings relating to the validity of the Amendment and/or proceedings incident thereto and shall continue so long as this Agreement is effective to refrain from objecting to and commencing any and all legal proceedings relative to the validity of the Amendment and/or proceedings incident thereto. District, and each and all of its individual and collective agents, representatives, attorneys, princi- pals, predecessors, successors, assigns, administrators, executors, heirs, and beneficiaries, hereby release and aiacnarge Agency and City, and each and all of Agency's and City's agents, representatives, attorneys, principals, pre- decessors, successors, and assigns, and each of them, from any and all obligations, liabilities, claims, coats, expen- ses, demands, debts, controversies, damages, causes of action, which any of them now have, or might hereafter have, by reason of any matter or thing arising out of or in any way relating to khe Redevelopment Plan, the Amendment and the Project. -10- /~ District recognizes that it is the intent of Agency and City in entering into this Agreement, to resolve all claims, litigation, disputes and controversies that Dis- trict, and each and all of its individual and collective agents, representatives, attorneys, principals, predeces- sors, successors, assigns, administrators, executors, heirs, and beneficiaries, may have relating to or arising out of the Redevelopment Plan, the Amendment and the Project and District on behalf of itself and the aforementioned persons and entities, warrant and represent as follows: 1. Neither District, and each and all of its individual and collective agents, representatives, attorneys, principals, predecessors, successors, assigns, administrators, executors, heirs, and beneficiaries, have any intention of asserting any claims or filing any lawsuits against Agency and City in connection with the Redevelopment Plan, the Amendment and the Project; and 2. District and each and all of its individual and collective agents, representatives, attor- neys, principals, predecessors, successors, asaigna, admi- nistrators, executors, heirs and beneficiaries, have not assigned any right, title, or interest in or to any claim or cause of action which may presently exise or may have exis- ted in the past, or may exist in the future against Agency or City or its asaigna and related and affiliated persons and entities. -11- /~ District represents and warrants that in agreeing to the terms of this Agreement it has read the Agreement, i[ has had the Agreement explained to it by Dis- trict's counsel, it is aware of the content and legal effect of this Agreement, it is acting on the advice of District's counsel and it is not relying on any representation made by Agency or City, or any of the employees, agents, represen- tatives or attorneys of Agency or City, or any of them, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. District, on behalf of itself and each and all of their individual and collective agents, representatives, attorneys, principals, predecessors, successors, assigns, administrators, executors, heirs, and beneficiaries, agree and covenant not to enter into any lawsuit which is based on any claims released or resolved by this Agreement, or is in derogation of this Agreement. District hereby agrees to indemnify Agency and City and save and hold Agency and City harmless from and against damages (which term shall mean actual cash expendi- tures arising out of, resulting from or related to any damage, liability, loss, coat or deficiency, including but not limited to, reasonable attorney's Eeea and other costs and expenses incident to proceedings oe investigations or the defense of any claim) incurced by Agency or City arising out of, resulting from or relating to: -12- ~j (i) Any inaccuracy in the representation or the breach of any warranty of District under this Agree- ment; and (ii) Any failure of District to duly perform and observe any term, provision, covenant or agree- ment to be performed or observed 6y District pursuant to this Agreement. Agency and City hereby agree to indemnify Dis- trict and save and hold District harmless from and against damages (which term shall mean actual cash expenditures arising out of, resulting from or related to any damage, liability, loss, coat or deficiency, including but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees and other coats and expenses incident to proceedings or investigations or the defense of any claim) incurred by District arising out oE, resulting from or relah;~~ r~: (i) Any inaccuracy in the representation or the breach of any warranty of Agency or City under this Agreement; and (ii) Any failure of Agency or City to duly perform and observe any term, provision, covenant or agreement to be performed or observed by Agency or City pur- suant to this Agreement. District, City or Agency acknowledge that they have been advised by their attorneys concerning, and are -13- /~ familiar with, the provisions of California Civil Code Sec- tion 1542, which provides as follows: "A General release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affec- ted his settlement with the debtor." DATED: August _, 1987 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT ATTEST: Secretary GATED: August _, 1987 Pres ent RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Secretary DATED: August , 1987 ATTEST: City Clerk Chairman CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor -14- J500463 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIW REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE; August 19, 1987 FROM: Jack Lam, AICP Deputy Executive Director HY: Olen Jones, Redevelopment Analyst SOBJSCT: REVIEW OF FORMS AND PROCEDURES FOR BUSINESS PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to proceed in advertising the program, or implementation concurrent with the adoption of the Foothill Corridor Specific Plan. BACHGROQND; In Fiscal Year 1986/87, the Redevelopment Agency approve the creation of a Business Property Improvement Loan Program, for the purpose of assisting commercial property owners fronting Foothill Boulevard in the improvement of the physical appearance of their property. In July, 1987, the Agency approved Vineyard National Hank as the administrator of certain financial services for the program, including processing of loan applications, preparation of necessary loan documents, and administration of loan account transactions. ANAr.VCTC_• c:...... program adminiatrator,~P Agency rs taff yhas been nworking wgth the Bank to develop the necessary Eorms and procedures to implement the program. The attached forms provide all the necessary information to ensure that the applicant and the proposed work qualify for the program, and that the Agency's funds are adequately secured. The forms are arranged in roughly the order in which the property owner would receive them. All forms are consistent with accepted banking practice. In order to minimize the expense to the owner, a Pre- Application form has been developed. This form provides the minimum amount of information necessary for the Agency to make a determination of eligibility. Thus, the owner need no[ i..^.ve~t a substantial amount of time in appi.ying, only to find that his proposed project will not qualify for the program. / b Once a preliminary determination of eligibility has been made, a more substantive application will provide Vineyard National Bank with the standard financial information needed to determine the financial ability of the owner as well as the feasibility of the project. This form has been provided by Vineyard National Bank. Agency staff will be available to assist the less-experienced property owners in the preparation of the Final Application form. R spectfull submitted, aC Lam, AICP Deputy Executive Director /9 RAMCNO COCAMOMGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOS NESS PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM PROCESSING PROCEDORES 1. Marketing 1.1 Preparation of marketing materials a. A Program brochure will be prepared, explaining Program benefits, eligibility requirements, application procedures, and identifying target area. b. An information package for Owners and Contractors will be prepared and will include: (1) Program guidelines and procedures (2) Pre-application materials (3) Instructions on preparing simple work write-ups 1.2 Brochures will be mailed directly to owners of property within the target area, and will be distributed through the Community Development Department, and the Chamber of Commerce. 2. Application Intake 2.1 Screen Potential Applicant Upon receipt of an inquiry, Agency staff will: a. Determine whether the property is in [he target area 6. Give the applicant a brief overview of the Program c. Obtain property owner's name and address d. Obtain the property address e. Determine square footage of the property and whether the owner is an occupant. f. Provide applicant with pre-application material. 2.2 Pre-application a. Enter application into Program 2zacking Log b. Establish individual case file C~ c. Review application for: (1) completeness (2) tenant information (3) existing indebtedness (4) proposed work items (5) estimated rehabilitation cost 2.3 Evaluate Project selection criteria Complete Scoring Analysis on the Pre-application Rating Sheet to rank proposed project taking into account the following criteria: a. Frontage b. Required City approvals c. Number of occupied and vacant units d. Owner's source of matching Eunds e. Whether General Property Improvements (GPI - improvements beyond the scope of the Program) are to be included f. Percentage of owner's equity g. Property's location 2.4 Preliminary Approval determination a. Advise owner in writing of preliminary determination b. If pre-application is approved for further processing, schedule property inspection, to determine eligibility of work. c, If not approved, notify owner, explaining reasons for rejection and that application will be retained and reconsidered with any future applications. 3. Property Inspection A property inspection should only be scheduled after a preliminary determination of eligibility has been made. There are two 12) purposes for the property inspection: (1) To identify work items required (2) To identify ineligible general property improvements 3.1 Schedule Inspection Contact property owner to arrange a mutually agreeable time for inspection. Inspection should be completed within fifteen (15) days of preliminary approval. 3.2 Inspect Property a. Interview property owner to identify known problems b. Walk through property with owner c. Sign and date Eligibility Determination Form 3.3 Brief Owner on obtaining a Contractor Agency will advise Owner that he must: a. Decide on the scope of work, including all Qualified Program Improvements and any General Property Improvements. b. Select a qualified contractor with whom the owner feels he can work. c. Work with the contractor to complete a work write-up acceptable to Agency. d. Ensure that the contractcr meets all City/Agency requirements. e. Obtain and submit a bid proposal w~tryi^ tti.-ty (3u~ ~cya ~. ii:e eirgrbriity inspection. 3.4 Brief Owner on owner/builder requirements The owner may indicate that he would like to complete the work as the owner/builder by subcontracting out the work and/or doing it himself. Agency must explain to owner that he must: a. Demonstrate that he has the technical experience or capahility to do the work b. Accept responsibility to obtain, oc have subcontractors obtain, all permits required by the Community Development Department. c. Obtain and retain separate paid receipts and/o[ invoices for all materials used for Qualified Program Improvements. d. Retain invoices or canceled checks for all work performed by, and paid to contractors/subcontractors e. Provide all of the above documentation to substantiate materials purchased and work (labor) performed before each progress payment is requested. g. Understand that no compensation will be paid for owner's own labor 3.5 Provide owner with Final Application and Information package, and request that the completed documents be submitted directly to Vineyard National Bank. 4. Contact Vineyard National Bank 4.1 Start loan packaging 9.2 Vineyard National Bank will order a Title Report and appraisal of the property and provide this information to Agency 5. Project Review 5.1 Review of Contractor's proposal a. Review total cost to verify it does not exceed the Program limit. If limit is exceeded, determine if owner can pay additional cost. b. Review the proposal for adequacy and verify that all eligible items are included in proposal. c. Review the proposal fnr r~=. - -~;o ~leuess. urscuss any drscrepancies with owner ands contractor. d. Verify that the Contractor meets all City requirements e. Review the Title Report and appraisal to determine property value and ownership. 5.2 Follow-up action Following review, if there are any problems, Agency will send the property owner a ].e tter outlining problems or discrepancies and suggesting corrective action. Recommendation may include: a. Provide missing documents b. Finding another contractor c. Renegotiating coats or removing General Property Improvements ~3 d. Clear title problems Owner must take corrective action and submit the required information within cif teen (15) days of the date of the notification letter. 5.3 Review by Vineyard National Bank a. Vineyard National Bank will review the proforma for the property and will evaluate the financial feasi 6ility of the project. Vineyard National Bank will determine if the total project cash flow will be adequate to carry all projected operating expenses, debt service on new loan(s) and existing debt service. Loan to value ratio shall not exceed those of prudent banking standards. b. Vineyard National Bank will review the owner's return on equity to ensure its adequacy based on the owner's current and/or requested return. c. Vineyard National Bank will make the final. determination on the quality of the application. d. Vineyard National Bank may, upon approval of the Agency, approve a loan "conditional" upon the owner providing any missing information or resolving problems still outstanding at the time of its review. 5.4 Application rejection An application may be rejected by Vineyard National Bank Eor the Following reasons: a. The documents required under Section 5.2 have not been received within 15 days. b. The project cost exceeds the total of available funding (Program and private). 6. Private financing 6.1 Any private Financing required for general property improvements and/or improvement costs aver the Program limitation must be verified by a commitment letter or proof of funds qn deposit. 6.2 Approval of a loan may be granted conditional upon the owner obtaining such verification no later than 30 days from date of notification of final approval. 7 7. Loan Closing All loans will be closed in accordance with standard banking procedures. 7.1 The Note and Deed of Trust will be executed 6y the Owner and recorded by the designated title company. 7.2 The private financing funds must be deposited with Vineyard National Bank in the Program account. 7.3 The owner will be provided with copies of all documents. 7.A The owner is responsible for the all Program costs, including appraisals, credit reports, title fees, escrow fees. These may be paid out of the 208 matching funds, or financed as a part of the Program loan. 6. Supervision of Rehabilitation 8.1 Pre-construction work conference a. Review all facets of work to be completed with owner and contractor to ensure that both parties understand the scope of the work and work schedule. b. Review the payment schedule and request foz payment procedures. c. Provide the owner with copies of the Payment Request Form. Owner and Contractor will complete the form prior to each recuPSred ,nspecticn, d. The construction contract and order to proceed should be executed by the owner. 8.2 Responsi bi~ities a. Owner will be responsible for: (1) monitoring contractor's work (z) Approval of contractor's request for payment. b. Agency will: (1) conduct progress payment inspections to ensure that the quality of work is acceptable. (2) verify that all necessary City inspections have been performed. (3) recommend release of progress payment Co Vineyard National Bank. ~ s (4) If no request for progress inspection is received within thirty (30) days of the agreed upon date of the start of construction, Agency staff inquire with owner as to progress of project. (5) If project fails to begin construction within forty- five (45) days of agreed upon date of start of construction, the loan agreement may be canceled and property owner notified. 8.s Change Orders a. Changes to the scope of work will only be accepted for the following reasons: (1) additional necessary work is discovered durine the construction. (2) the cost of the additional work does not exceed the Program limitations, or the Agency makes a determination that additional funding is warranted. (3) Changes comply with the Program requirements of the Business Property Improvement Loan Program. b. Changes to the scope of work in general property improvements will be allowed with the approval of the owner. Bowever, no increase in Program funding will be allowed Eor such a change. 8.4 Owner/Contractor disputes a. The resolution of any dispute over quality of materials and/or workmanship between the property owner and contractor/subcontractor shall be the responsibility of the property owner. b. The property owner and contractor/subcontractor are urged to resolve any dispute as quickly as possible. Failure to resolve such a dispute within the period allowed for construction of improvements shall be grounds for the Agency to cancel its loan agreement with the property owner. Should such a cancellation occue, the total amount of Program funds expended on the project may become immediately due and payable. A.5 Final inspection a. The owner will notify the Agency when: (1) All work on the property has been completed (2) The owner has inspected and accepted the completed work (3) The contractor has requested final payment b. When the owner calla for final inspection, the Agency will: (1) Ascertain the satisfaction of the owner with the completed work (2) Arrange for a final walk-through with the owner and contractor. Ownec will sign the final Payment Request form at the walk-through. c. During final inspection, Agency will: (1) Inspect the property with the owner and contractor (2) Complete the Payment Inspection Report (3) If the work has been completed satisfactorily, complete and sign the Payment Request, and give copies to the owner and contractor. (4) prepare the Payment Voucher and transmit to Vineyard National Bank In case of either a progress or final inspection, Agency will approve the contractor's payment request, minus ten percent (l0i). This amount will be held by Vineyard National Bank until the final payment to allow the contractor to submit final ::a=':c:~ aL ail liens trom suppliers and subcontractors. When all waivers have been received by Agency, it will approve the release of the final ten percent (108), and will request and disburse the final payment in accordance with the steps outlined above. RANCHO CHCAMONGl1 REDEVELOPMEefl' AGENCY HOSINES3 PROPERTY IMPROVBlIffiTf LOAN PROGRAM Dear Commercial Property Owner: Thank you for your inquiry regarding the Aancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency's easiness Pro rt I covenent Loan ProOra~. Following is a rie explanation o the program. PORPOSE: To assist owners of commercial property fronting Foo[hiI'I Boulevard within the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area in upgrading the facades of existing improvements. ELIGIBILITY: The program will be open only to owners of commercial property, not lessees or tenants, in order to~ ensure adequate security for the loans. Additionally, the loan applicant must have been the owner of the property for at lease two years prior to any loan being approved. Standard banking criteria and practices shall be used in evaluating applications. All necessary City approvals must be obtained prior to loan approval. All proposed improvements must conform to City design and construction requirements. TERMS: Loans will be available for up to 804 of the cost of acs a improvements and/or on-site improvements, not to exceed 550,000.00 per property, subject to standard ha nkinq industry loan standards. Interest rate on the loans shall be at the prime interest rate. Term 9ha11 not exceed 10 years. Loans will be secured by a first or second deed of trust on the property to he improved, Proceeds of the loan will be held by the Agency/Lender and disbursed to the owner upon submittal of invoices for work completed. The lean will become due and payable upon sale or transfer of the property. Special consideration will be given to owners of peoperry larger tnan .75 acre, or to applications of more than two owners of contiguous properties which are part of a single shopping center. Such applications may receive additional funds Eor common improvements due to the size and nature of the improvements. RLICIBLS II~ROVB116171'S: Loans will be available only for ua i ie Property Improvements (QPI). QPI consist of facade improvements to existing structures, and related on-site improvements. This may include the costs to repaint, reatucco, reroof, upgrade landscaping, resurface parking facilities, upgrade signing programs, or other minor on-site improvements. It does not include weed abatement, construction of new facilities, or demolition of existing structures. General Property Improvements (GPI): improvements to the property not eligible Eor BPILP funding may be included in the contract for rehabilitation, provided the property owner supplies the funding for these costs. Sources of this funding may include loans from a recognised lending institution or the owner's own assets or cash-on-hand. Enclosed you will find a Pre-Application form and a Service Agreement for the program. If you are interested in applying for a loan from the Agency's easiness Property Improvement Loan Program, please fill out the form . completely, sign the Service Agreement, and return both to: Olen Jones Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Thank you for your interest in the program. If you have any questions or need additional information. n7na sn ~a:i she Redevelopment Agency at 1714) 989-1851. Sincerely, O;en Jones Redevelopment Analyst 29 RANCRO COCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOSINffiS PROPERTY I!@AOVFdI@Tf LOAN PROGRAM 1. Property Owner's Name(s) 2. Address of Property Owner{s) 3 Property to be rehabilitated: Address APN Purchase Data: Purchase Date Purchase Price _ Owner's Cash at Purchase List all liens on property: 4 5 2nd 3rd Mortgagor (address) Original Amount Term Maturity Monthly Payment 6 7 Are taxes and insurance included in the payment? Current annual property taxes: $ 30 8. Total outstanding indebtedness on property: $ 9. What is the estimated value of the property? 10. How large is the property? Land Building Parking Frontage 11. What types of uses are occupying the property? Commercial/Retail Office Industrial Medical Government 12. How many square feet are vacant? 13. What is the likelihood of tenant relocation as a result of property rehabilitation? Likely Unlikely 14. What are current rents for the property? 15. What is the estimated cost of Qualified Program Improvements to be constructed on the property? 16. Do you intend to perform other work on the property which is not eligible for Program funding (GPI)? Yes No if so, what will be [he source of funding Eor these improvements? Owner assets, cash-on-hand Loan LbmbinatlOn 17. Has the proposed work been approved by the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department? If sue, please attach copies of approvals and conditions (if any). IE not, when do you anticipate approval? ~/ R11NCH0 CBCAlgNGA REDEYEI.OPMEN'E AGENCY BOSINBSS PROP I!O'ROVBMBNT LOAN P PRBT,ININARY APPLIGTIOl9 RATING PORM Applicant Name: Property Add ress• Number of Units: ~ Estimated Loan Amount: $ SCORING ANALYSIS 1. Number of square feet to be rehabilitated: (1000 = 1 pt; 1001-4000 = 2 pts; 4001-7000 = 3 pts; 7001+ = 4 pta) 2. Rating for vacant units: (1000 1 pt; 1001-4000 = 2 pt9; 4001-7000 = 3 pts; 8+ 4 pta) 3. Rating for frontage: (0-500 ft = 1 pt; 501-1500 ft = 2 pts; 1501-5000 ft 3 pte; 5000+ ft = 4 pts) 4. Likelihood of permanent relocations: (unlikely = 10 pts; subtract 5 points for each business likely to relocate as a result of the rehabilitation) 5. Percentage [hat cents are below market: (+ 356 = 4 pta; 25-35t = 3 pts; 10-24 = 2 pts; 0-10t = 1 pt) 6. Are GPI included in project? (yes 2 pts; no = 0 pts) 7. Owner's source of funding for GPi: (owner's assets = 3 pts; some owner's assets, some loan = 2 pts; all loan = lpt) 8. Percent of Owner equity: (-20t = 0 pts; 20-30t = 2 ptsi +u SOtt= 53 pg;' 40-501 = Opts; P TOTAL SCOAE• 3 a-- AANCBO CDCAMONGA REDEVSLOPMBNT AGENCY ROSINESS PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM RE: LOAN REQUEST FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT Dear Commercial Property Owner: Congratulations! Your pre-application Eor a Business Property Improvement Loan on the above referenced address has passed initial review. We would now like you to complete a full application. The full application will provide the necessary information and documentation to make a final determination as to the eligibility of your property for the program. Enclosed you will find information sheets and application material which we hope you will review, complete and return to us as soon as possible.- These materials include: A copy of your Pre-application Form Full application form from Vineyard National Bank Eligibility Determination Form as prepared by Agency staff Bid instructions and form Service Agreement nuuiiivuaiiy, ~icasc ~avviuc i,c nycu~yj viucyuau dliJi,oi ,~ letter or other formal documentation which verifies [hat (1) personal ~f ands are on deposit with a recognized financial institution in an amount equal to or exceeding the total of the 208 Owner contribution and any General Property Improvement costs; or (2) a recognized financial institution has approved a loan to the owner of the property in an amount equal to or exceeding [he total of the 208 Owner contribution and any General Property Improvement costs, conditional only on approval of a loan from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Business Property Improvement Loan Program. Please note that the Final Application must be accompanied by a check in [he amount of $475.00, payable to "VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK". Opon receipt of the completed Final Application, Agency staff will forward your application [o Vineyard National Bank for final review and approval. Snouid additional inf ozmation be required by the Bank, they will contact you directly. iE you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Olen Jones Redevelopment Analyst 3 3 RANCHO COCAIM)NGl1 RBDBVELOPNEIif ACSNCY 8081NBSS PROPHRTY IMPROVSIIBNT LOAN PROGRAM FINAL APPLICATION Property Owner's Name(s) 2. Address of Property Owner(s) 3. Property to be rehabilitated: Address APN SECTION A: VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK LOAN APPLIGTION PORM Enclosed you will find a Vineyard National Bank Real Estate Luan nppiiuaiiuu. Please complete cols form as a part of the final application. ~T SSCTIOH H: Il~ROVHIBt7T COST AND PIHAI9CING After receiving an acceptable bid from a building contractor for the items listed on the Eligibility Determination Form for your property, as weir as a [ermite inspection report, please complete this section. Please no[ that the estimates below should not include any loan origination, escrow, bid cost, reasonable review, appraisal, title search and other fees. These additional costs and Fees will be discussed with you by Agency staff should your Final Application be accepted, and may ultimately be included as a part of your loan 1. TOTAL COST OF CONTRACTOR'S HI6 TO PROVIDE QUALIFIED PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS $ (Part "A" of Hid Write-Up Form) 2. COST OF GENERAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS (Part "e" of Hid Write-Up Form) $ 3. COMBINED COST OF ALL PROPOSED PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS $ 4. AMOUNT OF LINE 3 OWNER WILL FINANCE WITN PERSONAL FUNDS (if any) $ 5. AMOUNT OF LINE 3 OWNER WILL FINANCE WITR FUNDS FROM PRIVATE LENDER (if any) $ 6. TOTAL OF OWNER-PROVIDED FINANCING (Should equal Line 2) $ 7. NAME OF PRIVATE LENDING INSTITUTION FROM WHICH OWNER WILL RECEIVE FUNDING (if any): Name Address: Telephone: - Contact Person: 8. Please attach a separate sheet if additional information is needed. ~~ SECTION C• ENCI.OSORES C~CRLIST This Full Application must be accompanied by the following items: A properly completed Vineyard National Bank Real Estate Loan Application. A properly completed Contractor Bid Write-Up Form. This is the Contractor which I/we have se_ected to perform the work. A fully executed Service Agreement A properly completed Termite Inspection Report (must have been prepared within the last six months). A check in the amount of $475.00, payable to "VINEYARD NATIONAL BANK". SECTION D: PERMISSION TO INSPECT AND VERIFY INFORMATION - By my/our signature(s) below, I/we hereby authorize the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, its employees and/or ` agents, to enter and/or inspect my/ouc property as needed in support of my/our request for a Business Property Improvement Loan. i/we authorize the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, its employees and/ar agents to verify any information I/we have provided in support of my/ouc .dyucaL wi o ~,ueaG2o5 .:J~,~rtj uj.r G.o .inn. ..J..L. Srgnatuce o Property Owner Date Signature o Property Owner Date Signature o Property Qwner Signature of Property Owner Date 3~ RANCHO CBCAMONGA REDEVELOPMBNf AGENCY BOSINESS PROPffi2TY IMPROVF.NENT LOAN PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION PORN This form is to be completed for all Business Property Improvement Loan Program (Program) applications. Below please note all improvements proposed by property owner, and the determination of eligibility for funding under the Program Date 37 inspected by RANCHO COC~IMDNGA REDEVE[.OPMEN'1' AGENCY B081NESS PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT LIMN PROGRAM SERVICE AGRE®IBH1' I/We have applied for a Business Property Improvement Loan through the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. In connection with this loan, if approved, I/we understand that the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency sta Ef will he inspecting my/our property and, to some extent, act as a technical assistant and consultant in determining the extent of repairs and/or rehabilitation (in accordance with the regulations established under the Business Property Improvement Loan Program) of the property located at I/we further understand that notwithstanding the services the Agency provides, it is my/our responsibility to approve work write-ups and/or specifications; solicit contractor and/or subcontractor bids; review the bids and select a contractor; sign the contracts and change orders, if requited; and approve all disbursements of funds. 1/we further understand that all loan funds will be held in escrow by Vineyard National Bank. Disbursement will be subject to my/or authorization and the authorization of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. I/we acknowledge that I/we have been advised that I/we should inspect the work as frequently as possible, and discuss with the contractor any difficulties or poor workmanship obsnronri. I/::c UGuc.aLa ud coat once materials are in place, the costs of repair or replacement is substantial. i/we understand that in ordinary repair/rehabilitation loans, lenders do not necessarily make thorough work -in-progress inspections, and that the Redevelopment Agency provides these services to me/us for the protection of its interests. However, these services ace not a guarantee of the work, nor is the Agency in any way responsible for any worker's performance. I/we further understand that the staff of the Redevelopment Agency cannot be personally available for all inspections of each segment of work performed on the construction site and that the Redevelopment Agency, its employees, members, ufficers and directors, will reasonably rely on the competency of each individual contractor as is normal in the course of such business negotiations, transactions, and executions of contracts. 3g I/we further understand that should any dispute arise with any contractor/subcontractor over any materials, workmanship and/or scheduling, that it is my/our responsibility to resolve such a dispute directly with the contractor/subcontractor. I/we understand that the Redevelopment Agency will not mediate, nor accept the responsibility for any such dispute. I/we further understand that should such a dispute remain unresolved at the close of the agreed upon period for completion of the improvements, the Agency may elect to cancel its loan agreement with me/us, and declare any and all amounts of Program funds previously disbursed as immediately due and payable. I/we further agree to hold harmless and indemnify the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and employees, members, officers, and directors in connection with acts performed 6y them which would reasonably be associated with Consultation, technical advice, financial counselling, loan processing, inspection, and other related activities. I/we authorize the staff of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency to obtain or provide specific reports, such as personal credit reports, property title and tax searches, building code inspection reports, termite reports, property appraisal, repair work write-ups and/or specifications, cost estimates, contractor bids, and other such reports as are necessary to perform their function under the terms of the Business Property Improvement Loan Program. Date Owner Date Rancho Cucamonga Re evelopment Agency ~/ R11NCH0 CDUIMON(,A REDEVELOPMENT AG@7CY BOSINBSS PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM CONTRACROR BID INSTROCTION LETTER Please read Che following before completing the attached "CONTRACTOR BID WRITE-UP" form. 1. The owner(s) of the property on which you are bidding for qualified loan improvement work has applied to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (Agency) fo[ a Business Property Improvement Loan Program (BPILP) loan. This loan will cover eighty percent (808) of eligible qualified loan improvement costs, up to a maximum of $50,000.00. The remainder of the qualified loan improvement costs will come from the owner's own financial resources and/or a private lender. 2. The selection of a Contractor to perform the work is entirely up to the owner of the property, who are free to accept any reasonable bid. A bid need not be the lowest, highest, nor median bid to be accepted, BOT must be complete, accurate and acceptable to the owner. 3. All Contractors must he properly insured for both bodily injury and property damage. Adequate proof of acceptable insurance coverage is required, and must be submitted with a completed "Contractor Bid Write-up Form". 4. All bids submitted by property owners shall be reviewed by AGenCV staff. who will make a Rite r~viaw of oarh hiA fnr ;to "reasonableness". The "reasonableness" review will involve all three (3) parts of the bid. 5. Contractors must thoroughly complete parts "A", "B", and "C" of the the "Contractor Bid Write-up Form" and agree to the stipulations and three month firm bid policy contained in part "C". 6. Part "A" Should include only those items identified by Agency staff as eligible for BPILP program funding on an "ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION FORM", a copy of which the property owner must supply to ehe Contractor. NO OTSBR ITEMS MAY BE INCLUDED IN PART "A". Be specific in activities to beto be un erta~ ken. 7. Fees for preparing and completing the "Contractor Bid Write- up Form" may be included in both pmts "A" and "B" and should be the last item for the respective pats and labeled as "bid write-up fee". Should the property owner obtain a BPILP loan, the portion relating to Part "A" will be considered an eligible cost. Otherwise, the fee is the sole responsibility of the owner. 'Y"O All materials and work methods must meet the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Additionally, property owners must approve all colors patterns, and materials listed by the Contractor in the "Contractor Bid Write-up Form". All loan proceeds to fund the qualified loan improvement work, both the BPILP program funds and the private funds, will be deposited into a construction escrow account with Vineyard National Bank in Rancho Cucamonga. Should the property owner's loan be funded, the Contractor will be paid in drawdowns executed at the option of the owner. These arrangements should be specified in the agreement between the Contractor and property owner. Every effort should be made to minimize the number of drawdowns. The Agency will require a ten percent (l0i) retention Eor each draw, which will be paid in a final draw, following the Notice of Completion period. The property owner and Agency must certify each drawdown request in order for the payment to be made to the Contractor. Payment will be made in the form of a two-party check, payable to the owner and the Contractor, unless the owner specifically requests a direct payment to the Contractor. 10. Upon approval of [he loan application, a written agreement will be executed between the property owner and the Contractor to cover all approved items in the "Contractor Bid Write-up Form", 11. Qualified loan improvement wo r'. should not exceed three (3) months from the time the "Notice to Proceed" is issued, unless otr~rwise a w.rifieA in rho anronma n• 12. The intent of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency is to ririmize Agency staff involvement in the qual .Eied loan ~•'ementprocess. Therefore, it is khe responsibility of .~e ;.it rector and property owner to adequate l^• determine .._ qualified loan improvement elated activities, !n0 i~r1d13, and C09t9, d8 Well a9 C•..9 UIVE any d19pUCeS WhlCh may arise. Failure of these two parties to c,eaolve any dispute may be cause for the Agency to cancel its loan agreement at the end of the period provided Eor qualified loan improvement activities to 6e completed. Should such a cancellation occur, any BPLLP program funds which have been disbursed to the property owner and/or contractor will become due and payable, 7 / RANCBO COCAMON(,A RSDEVBLOPMBNT AcBNCY BOSIHBSS PROPBRTY INPROV®Iffi7T LOAN PROG[UM CONTRACTOR'S BID WRITE-OP FORM PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACTOR ADDRESS PHONE: (_) CONTRACTOR LICENSE NOMBER: CLASSIFICATYON: This form is organized into three (3) parts as Follows: PART A: Qualified program improvements (QPI) descriptions and cost estimates PART B: General property improvements (GPI) description and cost estimate PART C: Stipulations, Cost estimate totals, and signatures. NOTE: CONTRACTOR SBOOLD RBAD "CONTRACTOR BID INSTROCTION L61T812 PROVIDB BY TB8 P PERTY OWNER BBPORE COMP ING TBIS POIIM. RANCHO COCAIgNG11 RRDEVELOPM6NT AGffi7CY ROSINR38 PROP®tTY INPROtiWAENT LOAN PROGRAM PART A: QOALIFIRD PROGRAM IMPROVHIffi7T3 ~f3 1. Part "A" work description should follow without exception the exact numbering system as found on the "ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION FORM" provided to the Contractor by the property owner. RANCRO COCAMORGA Rffi1SVELOPMERT AGENCY BOSI PROP I I.QAN PART "B"• G®10UL PROPERTY IMPROVEMERTS ~~ 1. Part "B" work descriptions and estimates are only for improvements not eligible Eor Program Funding. No Part "A" items should be included here. 2. Property owner will pay for all items included in this section. Part "B" work will not be covered under RANCBO COCAMONGA REUEVEI.OPNEErr AGENCY BOSINBSS PROPHRTY INP LOAN PROGRAM PART C: STIPOLATIONS, COST BSTIMATE TOTALS AND SIGNATORES Stipulations a teed to by Property Owner and Contracto[ 1. Owner will select all CO10[S do patterns. 2. All measurements provided by Contractor are true and accurate. 3. All work contemplated herein shall be completed within three (3) months from the date of the execution of this contract, and in a workmanlike manner, according to common standards and practices, and in compliance with all City of Rancho Cucamonga codes and ordinances. 4. All items to be "installed" or "replaced" shall be provided by the Contractor, and shall be new and of builder's line (average) quality. All items to be removed shall become the property of the Contractor unless otherwise epecif ied. 5. Contractor shall remove all construction and/or rehabilitation debris. 6. Only those changes which have resulted from unforeseen conditions relating to work indicated on Parts "A" and "B"oE this "Contractor Bid Write-up Form" will be considered for a change order. Changes will be accepted only if approved by the property owner, Agency, and any other lender financing the rehabilitation work, prior to installation. 7. The use of lead based paint is prohibited. Cost Estimates and Contractor Signature Total estimated cost of QPI Total estimated cost of GPI $ GRAND TGTAL $ The above cost estimates are my firm bid Eor the work to be undertaken, as identified in Parts "A" and "B". All cost estimates are firm for a period of three (3) months following the date of execution of this form, below. I agree to the stipulations above. Date Signature of Contractor or Authorized Representative / "' Acceptance by Property Owner9 To be signed by property owner(s) only ~COntract0[ and write-up form are accepted and approved. Owner acceptance a Contractor Bi Write-up Date Owner acceptance o Contractor Bi Write-up Date Owner acceptance o Contractor Bi Write-up Date APPROVED• Rancho Cucamonga Date Redevelopment Agency Vineyar National Bank Date ~~ RANCHO COCANONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOSIRESS PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM CONTRACT POR REHABILITATION Loan No APN THIS AGREEMENT, is made this day of 19 by and between hereinafter called "Owner", and hereinafter called "Contractor". WITNESSETH, that the Contractor and the Owner, for the considerations stated herein, mutually agree as follows: The Owner has applied to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency for a loan under its Business Property Improvement Loan Program (hereinafter referred to as "Program"). The undersigned Contractor proposes to furnish labor and materials, complete in accordance with the attached Specifications, for the sum of $ with payments to be made in a lump sum after approve~tinal inspection of work and loan closing, unless a progress payment is authorized by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter referred to as "Agency"). wll materials are guaranteed to be as specified. All work is to be completed in a workmanlike manner, according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from the attached Specifications will be executed only upon written consent of Owner, Contractor and the Agency. No extra costs will be paid when the Contractor has neglected to properly evaluate the extent of the rehabilitation work. The Contractor, in all cases, shall leave the work in a finished condition, as determined by acceptable building standards and the Agency, All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents, or Acts of God. The Owner shall carry fire, extended coverage and all other necessary insurance. The Contractor's workers shall be covered fully by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. The Contractor shall procure and maintain Contractor's Bodily I r,ju:y and Property Damaye insurance, including operations, completed operations and products, in the following limits: eodily Injury insurance in an amount not less than 5100,000.00 for injuries, including accidental death to any one person, and not less than $300,000.00 on account for one occurrence; Property Damage Insurance in an amount not less than $50,000.00 for each occurrence and $100,000.00 aggregate. The Contractor shall y7 furnish evidence of this comprehensive liability coverage protecting the Owner. The bid and proposal shall be accepted by the owner and Agency within sixty (60) days Erom the date established by the Agency for its receipt, provided that no work shall 6e commenced by the Contractor until he has received a written Notice to Proceed Erom the Owner and Agency. Nork will begin no later than seven (7) calendar days after the Notice to Proceed is issued. All work shall be satisfactorily completed within ninety (90) calendar days from the starting date. Contractor will keep the premises clean and orderly during the course of work, and remove all debris at the completion of work. Materials and equipment removed and replaced as a part of the work shall belong to the Contractor and be removed from the premises. The Contractor shall not assign the Contract without written consent of the Owner and Agency. The request Eor assignment shall be addressed in writing to the Agency. Work performed under the contract shall be guaranteed fo[ a period of one (1) year from the date of final acceptance of ali work required by the Contract. Contractor shall permit the Agency to examine and inspect all work performed under the contract. The Owner shall permit the Contractor to use, at no cost, existing utilities, such as light, heat, cower and water necessary to carry out the completion of the work. Owner will cooperate with rho Contractor to facilitate the performance of the work. After the contract has been executed, changes in the scope of work desired by the Owner shall be submitted in writing to the Agency. Contractor is not authorized to deviate from the work write-up or specifications unless so directed in writing by the Agency. The Contractor will furnish Owner, in Dare of Agency, affidavit and satisfactory release of liens or claims for liens by the subcontractors, laborers, and materials suppliers for completed work oc installed material. This contract consists of the bid and proposal, and the specifications and/or drawings for work to be done Eor the specific property involved. 7 V For the considerations named herein, the Contractor proposes to furnish all the material, and do all of the work described herein, and in accordance with the Contract identified above for a lump sum price of THE CONTRACT PRICE. The Owner will pay the Contractor for per ormance o the Contract $ subject to additions and deductions as prove a or n the Contract. Contractor Firm Name Owner Acceptance Contractor Signature Owner Acceptance COnCraCCO[ A re99 OWner A re99 City 6 State C ty s State Contractor's License Num er Rancho Cucamonga Business License NUmbe[ Date ~~ RANCHO COCAtgNGA RWEVBLOPMHtl' AGBIICY BOSI S PROPHRTY I!Q'R0VH16N1 LOAN CONTROL INSTR IONS Vineyard Bank is hereby appointed by the undersigned as fund controller Eor the sum of $ ($ from priva te funds and $ from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agencycy Business PropProperty Improvement Loan Program) in connection with a construction contract dated between (hereina te r re erred to as OWNERI an (hereinafter referred to as CONTRACTOR) o[ constructron of improvements located at Vineyard Bank is hereby rnatructe to ho a oresa sum and disburse said sum in the following manner: $ Impound Account (Payment of taxes and Insurance. $ Payment of demands (Escrow fees, title fees, etc) $ Contingency amount Eor contract ($ from BPIPL program funds and $ from private funds) $ To a paw two Contractor and/or his subcontractors and/or material suppliers oc other payees in progress payments approved by authorl2ed representatives of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. r TOT:,i, ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS: Each party acknowledges receipt of a copy of these instructions. Dated 19 Control Number Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Ownec Owner's Telephone Number Res Bus S RANCSO COCAMONGA RSDEVEIgPMF.NT AGENCY NOSINESS PROPERTY I!@AOVSMENR LOAN PROGRAM PAYMENT RHOORST PORN TO: Vineyard National Hank RE: ESCROW NUMBER P.0. Box 727 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 DATE: Gentlemen: Pursuant co the Control Instructions relating to the Loan captioned above, you are hereby requested to make the payment listed below to the payee shown herein, in the amount shown herein, as payment done oc services performed in regards to Owner's property. Hy signing the Request for Payment, the Owner certifies that none of the amount hereby requested to be paid has been previously paid from the funds on deposit in the above captioned escrow. The Owner hereby further certifies that he has no notice of any vendors', mechanics' or other liens, ahatf Pl mnrtnanea. nr nnnAitinnal aai.a nnt.~,.~. ..~w..~ obligations, which should 6e satisfied or discharged before such payment is made, or with respect to lien waivers have not been provided or surety bonds posted to you. With respect to obligations incurred Eor work, materials, supplies or equipment in connection with Owner's property, the Contractor, by signing the approval for a payment, hereby certifies tha[ with respect to that payment, ;1) the Contractor has no notice of any vendors', mechanics' or other liens, chattel mortgages, or conditional sales contracts, or other contracts or obligations, which should be satisfied or discharged before such payment is made, or with respect to lien waivers have not been provided or surety bonds posted to you, and )2) insofar as such obligation was incurred for work, materials, supplies, or equipment in connection with such rehabilitation, such materials, supplies or equipment were actually used in cr about such rehabilitation, or were dctvally delivered to the site of such rehabilitation, for that purpose. This certification is given without prejudice to any rights against third parties which exist on the date of such certification, or which may subsequently come into being. ~~ OM6 PABTY CH6Cb ADT8082SATION: Must be signed by Owner(s) to be valid. I we request that Vlneyar National Bank issue a one party check from this disbursement in favor of the Contractor or to the Payee named below. Owner: Owner: PAY TO• Owner: Contractor: THS BOM OF: FOR THB COIO'LLRION OP: Dollars 5 The undersigned approve and authorize the above transaction: Owner r ractor Date Date Date Date Rancho Cucamonga Re eve opment Agency sa RANCHO COCAIgNGA R®6VQ,OPN6NT AGffiiCY BO I PROPSItSY Ii4'ROVSII6NT LOAN PROGRAM PRO,ISCT TAACRIRG LOG Name: Address: Property Addresa: APN: Phone No: (Bus) Rome Pre- Applioation 1. Date Requested: Date Received: 2. Scoring Analysis: Dete Scored: Score• R eviewer• 3. ADDlicatinn: F.nrnu~annA ..~3COuragE.: 4. Eligibility Inspection Assignment Name: Date: Dale Due: Date RCCeived: 5. Full Application Sent Date Requested: Date Received: POLL APPLIG?ION 1. Date Requested: Date Received: 2. Approval by Bank Ddte Requested: Date Received: 3. Approval by Agency: Date Requested: _ Date Received: Sri CASR DRAWS First Draw: Date Requested: Date Received: Second Draws Date Requested: Date Received: TAird Draw: S Date Requested: Date Received: Final Draw: S Date Requested: Date Received: 10E Retention: Date Requested: Date Received: 6~ CITY OP RANCHO C:UCAMOI REDEVELOPMENT AGENC STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP Deputy Executive Director BY: Olen Jones, Redevelopment Analyst SOBJECT: Authorization for Agency staff to execute a Certificate of Conformance with Victor G. Ruiz, 9860 Adolfo Ct. RECDlDI@IDATIOM: Authorize staff to execute a Certificate of Con or-~ manse with Victor G. Ruiz, 9860 Adolfo Ct. HACRGROOND: As a part of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment, the Agency approved offering Certificates of Conformance to property owners within the Project Area whose property is developed in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. These Certificates exclude the property from the provisions of eminent domain authority. ANALYSIS: Staff has received a request from Victor G. Ruiz, B~A~olfo Ct, for the issuance of a Certificate of Conformance for his property. Research indicates that [he property was developed in conformance with the City's General Plan, the Redevelopment Plan, and all applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time the structures were constructed. fully Deputy Executive Director SS Recording Requested By And When Recorded Nail To: CERTIFICATE OP CONPORNANCE Whereas, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council ("Council", hereinafter) on August 6, 1987 adop[ed Ordinance No. 316A approving the Rancho Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1, Eor the Rancho Redevelopment Project ("Plan", hereinafter),; end Whereas, the Co~oaunity Redevelopment Law provides that the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ("Agency", hereinafter) may, upon request of a conforming property owner, provide a certificate of conformance to such owner provided that at the time of issuance, the property owned by such owner and located in the Rancho Redevelopment Project is in conformance with the provisions of the Plan; and Whereas, property owned by Victor G. Ruiz and more particularly known as San Bernardino County Assessor Parcel No. 1077-331-41, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is in conformance with the provisions of the Plan. NOW THEREFORE, Section 1: Aa provided in the Plan, the Agency hereby certifies and declares that the property owned by Victor G. Ruiz and described above is in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. Section 2: This Certificate shall remain in force while the above-described property remains in any use permitted under the Redevelopment Plan. S~ Section 3: The Agency hereby covenants that it will not acquire the above described property by use of eminent domain during the period this Certificate of Conformance remains in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Certificate this _day of , 198_ Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ATTEST: Property Owner By ATTEST: ~/ June 15, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Ad.iourned Meeting An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Monday, June 15, 1987, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Meeting was called to order at 8:02 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Counc ilmembers: Deborah N. Brown, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, Charles J. Buquet I[ (arrived at 8:15 p.m.), and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. 1. CONSIDERATION OF DEPARTMENTAL BUDGETS Councilman King stated he had some concerns regarding the risk management under Administrative Services. He stated he would like to see a comprehensive list made at least once a year of the things in the community which are considered dangerous property. This should be done by someone outside the City. Mr. Wasserman stated we could have someone give us some estimates if Council wished to do this, then we could make the appropriate budget transfers at a later time. ACIIUN: l:ouncil concurred Lo look into the cost of itemizing dangerous properties in the City. Mayor Stdut stated he was in favor of extending Beryl Park West. There would be 3/4 of a million dollars available to begin. ACTION: :ounc it concurred. Councilwoman Brown stated she had concerns about the personnel recommendations before Council for consideration. Since there are Some positions which were very low, she asked if there were other positions which were very high. Staff responded they did not know. (Bunuet arrived at 8:15 o.m.l . .City Council Minutes June 15, 1987 Page 2 Counc ilmember Brown felt that we should do another survey similar to the one done in 1984. Mayor Stout stated he had difficulty dealing with the equity adjustments during the budget process. Me felt this should be done about Octoher. Councilman King felt we should look at this but did not feel we needed to do a full blown classification study. Mayor Stout stated we should look at this sometime in July or August to see what should be done. ACTION: Council concurred with the Mayor's suggestion Councilman King stated that the E150,000 for the design and eng~i nee ring work for Central Park was premature since the park would not be built for another 10 years. Mayor Stout df sagreed feeling it was not premature and it was important to have a design; then certain parts of the project could proceed ahead. Mayor Stout wanted to leave the E150,000 as it was and start the design. ACTION: Council concurred. Councilwoman Wright expressed concern about: 1. The Administrative Intern positions. 2. Animal Control Services. 3. Nnd money which was spend for the City Yard. Since it wasn't done in a priority order. 2. ADOPTION OF BUDGETS A meeting was set on June 24, fo the adoption of the budgets. 3. AOJOU RNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet City Clerk June 17, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Nednesday, June 17, 1987, following a joint Redevelopment Agency/City Council meeting, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. After a recess, the meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. B. ANNOUNCENENTS/PRESENTATIONS Announcements/presentations were held prior to the joint meeting - see Redevelopment Agency Minutes. NO ITEMS SUBMITTED . • ~ .. . C_ CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 5/27/87 and Payroll ending 6/3/87 for the total amount of (1,417,618.38. C2. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Winegrowers and Stilis (2), J. FiI iDD~ Vintage Co., Joseph A., Joseph P. and Mary E. Filippi, 8916 Foothill Boulevard. C3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer, Star's Fitness Center, Lynda L. & Steve Unger, 8618 Archibald Avenue. C4. Approval of Minutes: March 18, 1987 April 1, 1987 April 15, 1987 C5. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement extensions for Tracts 13027 and 12832, located in Victoria Planned Community, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION N0. 87-290 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPWOV EMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACTS 13021 AND 12832 City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 2 C6. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement extensions for Tracts 10827, 10827-2 and 10827-3, located south of Nilson Avenue, between Hermosa and Haven Avenues, submitted by First National Network Mortgage Company. RESOLUTION N0. 97-291 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACTS 10827, 10827-2 AND 10827-3 C7. Rpprovai of Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 85-704) to the Contract for Base Line Road/19th Street Beautification far design services, final plans, specifications and estimates to be added to the Professional Services Agreement with Terrasc apes, Incorporated. The additional funding will accommodate an expanded scope of work to be incorporated with the pending Base Line Road widening. The fee increase of E1 ,600.00 brings the contract total to E8 ,700.00, and will be funded with Beautification Funds. C8. Approval of map, execution of Improvement Rgreement and Improvemen~ Security for Tract 13342, located at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street, submitted by Pannon Design and Development and First Nationwide Mortgage Company. (]tem removed from agenda.) RESOLUTION N0. 87-292 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LULHMUNGH, LN L1 hU Kn IA, AIY YK VYlnh 11'IYI(VVEm EIII HG RC EI~1[11T, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ANO FINAL MAP OF TRRCT N0. 13342 C9. Rpproval to execute improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 86-22 located on the east side of Sixth Street, north of Buffalo Avenue, submitted by Donald and Linda Kaplan and a Resolution accepting an offer of Dedication for street purposes on 6th Street. RESOLUTION N0. 87-293 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A 6D' DEDICATION ON 6TH STREET AS OFFERED FOR STREET AND RELATED PURPOSES RESOLUTION N0. 87-294 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-22 City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 3 C10. Approval to ezecu to Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 5810 Hellman Rvenue, located north of Monza ni to Avenue, submitted by James Ngiam. RESOLUTION N0. 87-295 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRCV ING INFRO'J EMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RES IOENCE RT 5810 HELLMAN AVENUE C11. Approval of Relinquishment of Restrictive Covenants for property located on the northeast corner of Hellman Rvenue and Seventh Street, submitted by Golden Hest Equity Properties. C12. Approval of map, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12571 located on the south side of 19th Street, between Beryl and Hellman Avenues, submitted by Nordic Development Company. RESOLUTION N0. 81-296 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINRL MAP DF TRACT N0, 12571 C13. Approval to award and execute contract (CO 87-059) for the Professional Services Agreement for the construction Staking and Surveying far the ua xer Rvenue and Arrow Noute Storm Urain and Street Improvement Project awarded to L. D. King, Incorporated for the amount not to exceed b18,000 to be funded from Systems Development and Drainage Funds and reimbursed by Housing Set-A-Side Funds. C14. Approval to award and ezec ute contract (CO 87-060) for the Professional Services Agreement for the soils and materials testing for the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project awarded to Richard Mills Associates for the amount not to exceed 53,900 to be funded from Systems Development and Drainage Funds and reimbursed by Housing Set-A-Side Funds. C15. Approval to award and execute contract (CO 87-061) for the Professional Services Agreement for the contract inspection services for the Da ker pve nue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project awarded to C. i. A. Engineering Consui toots for an amount not to exceed $36,960 to be funded from Systems Development and Oraina ge Funds and reimhu rsed by Housing Set-A-Side Funds. City Council Minutes June 17, 1981 Page 4 C16. Approval to accept the Residential Street Rehabilitation, Phase II Improvement Project as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of E143,419.23. RESOLUTION N0. 87-297 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI1E CITY OF Rf4NCH0 CUCMIONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC [MPROV EMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION, PHASE II AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE pF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK CI1. Approval to accept the Archibald Avenue at A.T. d S. F. Railroad Crossing Irprovement Project as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of 578,873.50. RESOLUTION N0. 81-298 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE ARCH IBALD AVENUE AT A.T. d S. F. RAILROAD CROSSING ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C18. Approval to accept the Traffic Signals at Five Locations Improvement Project as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a `nocice or compi ecion~' and approve the rinai cunt race amounc or D~/u,3l,i. u. The locations are at Ninth Street and Vineyard Avenue, Hellman Avenue and Arrow Route, Church Street and Haven Avenue, Base Line Road and Beryl Avenue, and Lemon Street and Haven Avenue. RES GLUT ICN N0. 87-299 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT FIVE LOCATIONS ANU AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C19. Approval to award the Turner Avenue Roadway and Storm Drain Improvement Project to Stanley F, Yelich for the amount of E885,165. 90. v2 D. Appi GYdi tJ dwdid the Bdie Line Redd Ge da ti flCd t'iun Proj e~L (rUal "nanlu nd Avenue to Teak Way and the Entry Monument at West City Limits to Bo park Enterprises, Incorporated for the amount of $47,330. City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 5 C21. Approval to accept the Residential Street Rehabilitation Phase I Improvement Project mute specifically described as: Malachite Avenue, Leucite Avenue, Klusman Avenue, Jadeite Avenue, Devon Street, Hampshire Street and the alley south of Foothill Boulevard (between Archibald Avenuo and Malachite Avenue) as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Nati ce of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of E301 ,877.20. RES CLUT ION N0. 87-300 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET REHABILITATION PHASE I, MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS: MALACHITE AVENUE, LEUCiTE AVENUE, KLUSMAN AVENUE, JADEITE AVENUE, DEVON STREET, HAMPSHIRE STREET AND THE ALLEY SOUTH OF FOOTHIL BOULEVARD (BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND MALACHITE AVENUE) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C22. Approval and execution of Contract Change Order Nv. 1 to Professional Services Agreement (CO 87-020) for Oon Greek d Associates for design administration for a minimum of 2 projects. The Change Order allows for the addition of the additional project studies and the completion of work started for the first two projects. C23. Approval of agreement (CO 87-062) for replacement of overhead with underground distribution facilities between Southern California Edison Company and the City of Ranc by Cucamonga far the un dergrounding of electrical utilities on HrroX Route within the Ilmlts of the tlaKer HVenue ana Nrrow Koute ~tarm Drain and Street Improvement Project for an amount of E118 ,274.00 to be paid for by the Systems Development funds Lo be reimbursed by Housing Set-A-Side Funds. RESOLUTION N0. B1-301 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGP.EEMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR ANO CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 6 C24. Approval to accept improvements, release bonds and notice of completion for: Tract 12672 located south of Terra Vista Parkway, west of Spruce Street Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) E47,594 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4,159 RESOLUTION N0. 87-302 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, P.C CEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12672 P.ND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C25. Approval to release Maintenance Bonds for: Vittoria Planned Community Tract 11934 8 33,800 Tract 12044 bi40,000 Tract 12045 $ 50,000 Tract 12046 $ 53,600 Terra Vista Planned Community Tract 12316 $10,100 ira cc i2.ii o-i (moaei sj > 5,61u Tract 12316-1 (Base Line Bridge) $ 6,300 Tract 12317 $14,800 Tract 12317-1 $10,100 Tract 12364 $14,290 Tract 12364-1 $17,470 Tract 12365 $25,272 Tract 12402 (Storm Drain) $38,964 Tract 12402 $13,518 Tract 12316-1 (Base Line Road) $45,830 C26. Approval to declare one Wang PC, model PC-%C2, StN NN 6710, surplus in order for it to be used as a trade in for additional equipment. C27. Approval to accept the Hermosa Avenue and Hamilton Street project as ~unipietr., mi,i au tiiurite tiro Ci'vy uig iiiecr to fiie ~ iiJ Live of Cumyieti un fur the work. RESOLUTION N0. 07-303 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAn CHO CU CRMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND HAMILTON STREET, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 7 C26. Approval to accept the He nnosa Park project as complete and authorize the Director of Community Services to file a Notice of Completion for the work. RESOLUTION N0. 87-304 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OF THE HEP,MOSA PAP,K PROJE C? ANO AUTHO P.IZING ?HE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C29. Approval of a Resolution declaring Lhe City's recommendation to retain KCET, public television, at its present lower numbered table tier (VHF band) and oppose a proposal to realign the public station to a higher numbered cable tier. RESOLUTION N0. 87-305 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING ITS STRONG RECOMMENDATION TO THE CABLE ONNERS AND OPERATORS IN LOS ANGELES AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TO RETAIN KCET IN THE AREA OF MOST FAVORABLE ACCESS TO .HE PUBLIC C30. Approval of authorization to conduct team development program. C31. Approval of authorization for City Attorney to prepare and City Manager to execute Hold Harmless Letter with Nicholas J. Coussoulis Development Company iur pur pueea ui iw iG my uay ~i ceit yi uuuu ui en piny ~r., emm~ieo mi p, iva Leiy uwneG land. C32. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, authorizing the levy of an assessment. management fee for the expenses incurred in the collection of assessments in the Alta Loma Channel (fl4-2), and The Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund Uist rict (82 -1 R). RESOLUTION N0. 87-306 A NESOI.UTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FURN IA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHAP,GE FOfi THE EXPENSES INCURREC [N THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS Nc ioi" '1 'i the Appr ~~^y an spcc~ tax ,.om^u ty Fac ilities•~0istrict No~~ 84 ~1 ~~(Day Cree k~Drainage System) for the amount^lof yJ50.00 per acre. There is no increase from last year and $200 below the maximum. RESOWTION N0, 87-307 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPELI AL TA% FOR A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 8 C34. Approval to redeem bonds, publish and mail Notice of Redemption for prepaid assessments within the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82-1 R) for approximately 5128,815. C35. Approval of Resolution ordering preparation of Reapportionment Report and approval of Resolution passing on Reapportionment Report for Parcel Map 9301 within the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refunding District (82-1R), giving preliminary approval, and setting a Lime and place for public hearing. RESOLUTION N0. 87-308 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, OROE R[NG THE PREPARATION OF A REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND AMENDED ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSESSMENT OISTRI CT AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMENT FEES FDR PARCEL MAP 9301 WITHIN THE SIXTH STREET INDUSTRIAL PARK REFUND DISTRICT (82-1R) RESOLUTION N0. 87-309 A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON REAP PORT[ONMENT REPORT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, ANO SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING C36. Approval to annex Tract Nos. 13342 and 12577, and the westerly Base Line entry monument wall parkway (various locations within the City, see attached maps) Co Landscape Maintenance Utstn ct no. I as none xation no. sS and set the date of public hearing for July 15, 1987. RESOLUTION N0. 87-310 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN CHU CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 35 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RES OlUT10N N0. 87-311 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF RANCHO C1ICRMONGA, CRL[FORN IA, DECLARING ITS (NT ENT ION TO ORDER THE ANNE%ATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 0[STRI CT N0. A, AN ASSESSMENT UiSTRiCT: D'eSi6HAiiNG SAi"u AiiiiEX.Aii"uii AS ANNEXATION N0. 35 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDS CAPiNG AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OF FIRING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING 08 JECTI ONS THERETO City Council Minutes June 11, 1987 Page 9 C37. Approval to initiate proceedings for the formation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Industrial and Conmerc ial Areas) and preliminary approval of the City Engineer's Report and setting the date for public hearing as July 15, 1987. Projects in the initial formation are DR 85-37 (PM 9409) and CUP 84-37 (PM 8981) RESOLUTION N0. 87-312 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORN IR, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 (INOUSTR/AL AND COMMERCIAL AREAS), PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LIGHTING ACT OF 1912 RESOLUTION N0. 87-313 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING ITS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 (IND USTR IRL, COMME RC IRL AREAS) RESOLUTION N0. 81-314 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 (INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL AREAS), PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 19I'2 ANU SEIIINP .HE UAIE hUK YUU LIC MLNH1Nh A~ JULi 15, 1987 C38. Ap pre•~al to annex DR 86-22 located on tha east sides ^f :i ~t'~ «-eet, north of P:,`fai. `.e nU° *^ Landscape Maintenance Cidt riot No. as Annaxac~~.~ sic, 3 ano set thn date of public hearing fUr Jaly 1E, 1981. RESOLUTION N0. U7-315 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CRLIFORNI A, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE%AT10H N0. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE UISTRI CT N0. 3 RESOLUTION N0. 87-316 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, OECLARI NG ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNE%ATI ON TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNE%ATION AS ANNE%AT[ON N0. 3 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LRNDS CA PE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 10 C39. Approval for intent to vacate a portion of the non-vehicular access rights as dedicated on Parcel Map 4029 located on the east side of Eti Wanda Avenue, south of Shasta Drive and set public hearing for July 15, 1981. RESOLUTION N0. 87-317 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN 6ER,NARDINO, STATE CF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE NON-VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS OF ETINANOR AVENUE SOUTH OF SHASTA DRIVE C40. Approval to annex Tracts 12577 and 13342 (various locations within the City, see attached maps) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 25 and set the date of public hearing for July 15, 1987. RESOLUTION N0. 87-318 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 25 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 R ESOLUT IDN N0. 87-319 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNE%AT(ON lU Sl Nttl uGHItnG MAiniEHiur CE DiSi ni vT ii G. i ASSESSME;iT DISTRICT; DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATI~~N N0. 25 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. _: rU~~SUAST TO '. HE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 ANO OFFERING A TIME 1'w D PLACE FOR HEARING 08 JECTIONS THERETO C41. Approval to annex Tract No. 12517 (located on the south side of i9th Street between Beryl and Hellman) to Street Li gh ttng Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation No. 19 and set the date of public hearing for July 15, 1987. RESOLUTION N0. 87-320 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT'i OF RANCHO f,U CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPOkT FOB ANNEXATION N0. 19 TO STREET LIGHTING MAI NI ENAN CE GiSiRiCi N"u. "c City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 11 RESOLUTION N0. 87-321 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MA [NTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 19 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. Z; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OO JE CTIONS THERETO C42. Approval to annex Tracts 1829, 3221 and 4224 and Assessor's Parcel Nos. 207-235-1, 2, 19, 20, 21, and 207-234-9, 10 and 11 (southwest Rancho Cucamonga) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 1 as Annexation No. 24 and to Street Lighting Maintenance Oist rict No. 2 as Annexation No. 18 and set the date of public hearing for July 15, 7987. RESOLUTION N0. B7-322 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALiFORN IA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF C[TY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE%ATION N0. 24 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RESOLUTION N0. 67-323 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION IU SI Htt1 ubniinti riAiiiTEiirviCE "v iGT: "'; ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNE %ATi ON N0, 24 TO STREET I,i GHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOL l1T ION N0. 87-324 A NESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PREL iMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE%ATION N0. 13 (0 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 RESOLUTION N0. B7-325 O THE CIrY Dc rNn A Ht Silt uTlON OF THE CiT'i CwiiC IL F .AN _.._ CU CAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING iTS INTENTION TO GRDER THE ANNE%ATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNE%ATION NO. 16 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LI GHTiNG ACT C. 1972 ANU OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes June 11, 1987 Page 12 C43. Approval to set public hearing - July 1, 1987 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 81-028 - CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA - An application to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from: A. Heavy Industrial to General Industrial for approximately 106 acres at the future southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Utica Rvenue to the future intersection of Arrow Highway and Milliken Avenue; and for approximately 52 acres at the southeast corner of Arrow Hi 9hway and Rochester Avenue; and for approximately 7.5 acres on the southeast corner of Etiwa nda and Whittram Avenue; and B. General Industrial to Industrial Park for approximately 35 acres on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and White Oak Avenue; and C. General Industrial/Rail Served to General Industrial for all areas currently designated as General Industrial/Rail Served. MOTION: Moved by 8uquet, seconded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar minus Item 6. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). + * + x • ~ D. CONSENT ORDINANCES City Clerk Au thel et read the titles of Ordinance No. 314 and 315. U1. RMtNUM tNI IU DLLILUN 1U Un InE mUn lE itNi LUUE -c.iiAGLi~ii iirG n a Ew Lii6ii OF 35 MPH ON BANYAN STREET FROM BERYL STREET TO LONDON AVENUE. ORDINANCE N0. 314 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMON CA MUNICi PAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS D2. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGING THE PUO LIC SAFETY COMMITTEE STATUS TO THAT OF A PERMANENT COMMISSION. City Attorney stated that staff co uid not be on a Commisssion. Co unciiman 5uquet stated UIaL membeis of other Coneais sic ns should not be included either. Mayor Stout appointed Councilwomen Brown and Wright to a subcommittee to discuss a selection process for Public Safety Commissioners and to report back at the July 1st meeting. City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 13 ORDINANCE N0. 315 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 2.56 TO TITLE 2 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPRL CODE RELATING TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION MO?ION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Nright to approve Consent Ordinances and waive full reading. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). ::... . E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS E1 The joint meeting was held earlier in the evening. See Redevelopment ggency minutes far consideration of Resolution 87-269 and Ordinance 316. • •.. i<• E2. PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88. Staff report by Lauren M. Nassenna n, City Manager. nayUr JIUUL Upellell i.lle IIICCLIIIy IUI' pUUI it iltlaf illy. TIIe1e ,la] iN IlIIU11~ response. The hearing remained opened with Mayor Stout continuing the meeting to Tuesday, June 23, at 7:00 p.m, at the Neighborhood Center. ~ . • + + x E3. AOOF?ION BY REFERENCE MODEL CODES - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of various codes as published by the International Conference of Building Officials and/or the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials or the National Fire Protection Association. (CONTINUED FROM MAY 20, 1981 MEETING. ITEM TO BE CONTIN UEO TO JULY 1, 1987.) City Council Minutes June 11, 1981 Page 14 ORDINANCE NO. 311 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.08, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24 AND 15.28 OF TITLE 15, BUILDINGS ANO CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CU CAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE IN THEIR ENTIRETY, AND SECTIONS 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, AND 10 OF THE SRN OERNARD INO COUNTY CODE ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 11; AND AGOPTiiaG BY REFERENCE THE "UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE", 1985 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE", 1985 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO; THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS", 1985 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM MECHANICAL LODE", 1985 EOITI OPI INCLUDING ALL APPENOI CES THERETO; THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE", 1985 EDITION INCLUDING ALL AP PENOICES; THE "NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE", 1981 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BU ILOINGS", 1985 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE", 1985 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE", 1985 EDITION; WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND E%CEPTIONS TO SAID CODES, INCLUDING PENALTIES MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Brown to continue this item to July 1, 1987. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). ... + . « E4 iyni - Starr requesn ng the ctty ~ounc a approve the secona coon nuance or tots public hearing thereby granting Willdan Associates additional time to research a discrepancy in a previous reapportionment of subject parcels. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to continue item to July 1, 1987. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). R # M M + r E5. AMBULANCE SERVICE PERMIT REN ENAL - MERCY AMBULANCE - Approval of request to renew am balance service permit for Mercy Ambu~ance. Staff report by Mark Lorimer, Administrative Analyst. Mayor Stoui opened Lire meeting PGf pu bl iC heatin9• Addressing Council a'a s: Homer Aerts, Mercy Ambulance, requested Council's approval of Lhe permit renewal. Councilwoman Wright requested a report back in three months as ~o whether there were any violations of the response times. City Council Minutes June l7, 1987 Page 15 Council felt that the Public Safety Commission should look into getting Mercy Ambulance on the computer response with the Ontario Fire District. There being no further public reS Po nse, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright to approve Mercy Ambulance's request for renewal of its ambulance service permit to provide ambulance service within L'ne City. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). * ! # # # F. PUBLIC HEARINGS RESOWTION N0. 87-326 q RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALI FORNIR, ORDERING THE INSTALLATION OF FROtITAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR APN 207-201-03 AND APN 207-262-39, IN gLCUNUANCt W11N LMAYItN Z/ Uh tHt 1MYHUV tMtNI H61 OF lYLI, SAID PARCELS ARE LOCATED ON ARROW ROUTE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE BAKER AV ENIIE AND ARROW ROUTE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MOTION: Moved by Bu quet, seconded by Brown to continue the item to July 1, 1987. htu tion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). ! k R • F /( 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS G1. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SAFETY MEASO RES IN THE VICINITIES OF COYOTE CANYON SCHOOL AND WINDROWS SCHOOL - Recommendation to approve placement of a crossing guard at Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway and to establish a four-way stop ac Vic ioria Park Lane and 'V is ioria windrows LOOP. Stafr repo ri by Russell Maguire, City Engineer. Mr. Maguire recommended to continue the item relating to Windrows School to duly 1, 1987, MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to approve the crossing guard at Coyote Canyon Sc hcol. Mo tien carried 4-0-1 (King absent). ~! 4 f # R # City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman, stated Lhat we needed a little more time to work with some of the property owners. City Council Minutes June 17, 1987 Page 16 G2. REOU EST FOR WORKSHOP ON WASTE TO ENERUY PROJECT. Councilwoman Wright stated she had sat in on a presentation at the League of Cities Meeting and did not feel she needed further information. Mayor Stout stated he has talked with representatives from Ogden Martin and that he also did not need further information. Councilman Bu quet felt we should make this information ova ila6le to the citizens and anyone who will take the time. Councilwoman Wright responded that this would be a good idea. She did not have any problems with that suggestion. ACTION: After further discussion, Council concurred to schedule a workshop between July 13 and 27 at 6:00 p.m. Council directed that the meeting be well publicized and to set August 5 fora public hearing. # i • • R ! G3. PARTICIPATION IN JOINT EKERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT WITH CITIES OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. Staff report by Lauren M. Nasserman, City Manager. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). ~ + + a x + H. COUNCIL BUSINESS H1. ISSUE OF STATE RUN REHABILITATION PROGRAMS (BUpUET). Councilman Bu quet stated the reason he 6rou ght the item before Council was the public concern of an activity going on in a residential home. Such as a large number of vehicles parking and a large number of unrelated pe r5o ns going to and from a home causing the neighbors to feel that an illicit activity was going on. We get code enforcement involved. They check into it and find out it is a State half-way house or some type of rehab program which has came into an established neighborhood. Often the times the owner has not been on site for years. The State is reluctant to cooperate with the City. Mr. Buquet further stated Lhat he would like us to explore what alternatives or options we can take to head off some of these conflicts. There needs to be a way to get State peo pie to be ou niiJera le of local znniny laws. City Council Minutes June 11, 1987 Page 17 Mr. Buller, City Planner, stated that this is controlled by the State. They can occupy up to six individuals in a home, and we cannot require a co nditionzl use permit. This has been a problem for some cities. There are na provisions which we can implement into our codes that would give us control. Ne can enforce parking violations, but we cannot tell them they cannot have six unrelated individuals inside a house. Mr. Markman, City Atty rney stated that the State has preempted cities from stopping certain uses such as rehab homes and childcare homes with up to twelve children during the day within residential areas. Mr. Markman further stated that we can look into a notice requirement, but anything different will have to be addressed by the legislature. The State is hard and fast on Lhis. Usually the County administers these programs far the State. Councilman Buquet requested that the matter be taken to SANBAG which has representatives from all cities and ask for an inquiry of their cities and how they resolve this. ACTION: Mayor Stout asked Mr. Buquet to represent the City on this issue at SANBAG. . , . « . . H2. CONSIDERATION OE A STOP SIGN AT HILLSIDE AND SAPPHIRE (WRIGHT). Councilwoman Wright requested to con ti r.ue this item since Mr. King wasn't present and he was interested in Lhis. Mayor Stvut stated that it was going to the Public Safety Commission next week. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright to continue the item to July 1, 1987, Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent). x ~ • + s I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Councilwoman Wright wanted the Council to confront the issue of recycling. She would like staff to look at what kind of thing we would actually be tackling. She would like to know issues such as: What are the issues? Pro and Con .., r. , ry up 3. How do ~we~doJit? and what do~we'do tongetnitns to rted? How do we phase it in? 4. Rdo pting a resolution Lo the State politicians in regards to recyclable packaging. 5. Feasi Gil ity to incorporate this into the franchise wit.. our refuse companies. 6. She would like a preliminary report at Lhe next meeting Lo at least consider the number of hours wv uld be required by staff to do snmet hi ng like this. City Council Minutes June 17, 1981 Page 18 Mayor Stout stated we also needed some method to determine if there would be community support for this type of program. Perhaps some kind of survey to be included with the trash hill etc. Councilwoman Brown stated that this could be included in the survey under public services. x : • . . . J. COMNUNI CATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ND ITEMS SUBMITTED. ++.+.. K. ADJOURNMENT Meeting to adjourn to June 23, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, for the purpose of taking action in regard to the second reading of Ordinance No. 316 approving the Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 for the Rancho Redevelopment Project. MOTION: Moved by Hright, seconded by Brown to adjourn. Motion carried 4-G-1 (King absent). The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p. m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authel et City Clerk 00 0 0 ~ r mmnoornaroooomJOn wm mo¢a 0 onnomompoomam ±a+°o r...o Op -. o m ~~-o.~. z~+.-a m.e mu. n.~n.:m oo o.o ~.. .~.. omn..n~+,n rv~n ~. r-u~mam a ~ i ~ ~ m _ m°O ..r ry u m nm~ ry m a .. .. m i. fu i L 6i npOnmNawaJmmanmPOnrvmru~JrvmpOtirymrmanmp0.~" O PJJY~J~anl-I-rnnrnnnn~ rynm'mmm V 21 maa.o.a..anal.ai~a.ai.aiai.aiaaiaiai.ai.wi~n.a+aa.ai n.an n.a+a.paaaan.ai n.an 7 1 .r n .~ n .~ .~ V ~ R n O u1 Z 2 nrn~P f jfLL'1 ~n ama Wr~2 .=+iw6 ~-%w ~ a,J ry¢wrow aa~a wa<a-.~~u.-siWizaif .. .. .. ¢ ;°n ~` ~ „ WzQiurcotioti i.L.` ¢ i .°soi u i oaN.m'i .. z ~ zx o ~ z roam n..,+ououLLu Sy J T 'S ¢¢¢¢'YKaCa'¢¢Y¢r2 (?' o c~'ocaooooaz a Vm m u u ~~ w uu u u uwuu oY Y~ ~ Owr 1 m V ~Lf f0 N M1 S VOO-~~~VO~.~^ V2o ~+V¢ `a o ~i~' n i =i V U ~) V V JJVVJVYVJ JVJJ LiIO c YY¢~¢mV [Y ~ ~ Y L s'w y ,. ~ r,x z ¢ z °zx J ° c Y (eau ~>.. aizN w~ L o ~ ax :. ,LL ~m i~` uwi~ ~ :. a ^w ¢.. ~~~~cWiozs z` i :i win ~=~i iw~~no f Jf ..wi _ i zm' ~ i. 9 J rn Q¢ww4'-i-O O ' ~~VO rVwW wLZ ni wp... .~ n l V Y C¢ U1 O'~1f~a~7yn60~6V a¢Y tt~ f(dm LL m..UT'+~N ..m?Sy..J V•~rv a~~m amY O .^ V aO ry^nymFp .~n V-.P .nn mYm rym a 'r ~ ~ //. o~.~un, o np 7 oa uooo aa~u..mooooomnU OOOO O~n ooo..+moi-mr l-o uoor oaooonraomoomonrnvmnoomonPOO ..nornaromooP n .:or"'C,nY~-~,mm~.w.mc.omcmoo°a m`~m°i,an rnNm~~moo~n,~. i-o,n ~. n -. rm rma n ra .. ..nr,rn o°i',~ ¢ i ~ -n .. .. ~- m n n n .. a< i m.eimiu..nmvmatim>u..rvmrm ar mR.u rnmraa my wFn m,~.ra,nam~raFr,a-ia.nr_°r'_r~-rn-Nr~-tir~rm~~mm u~omausaaoaaa a,oaaaaaaaaaamaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ii ..~ ................r...,.................,.......+...... ...... .................. u ~ i==i r o is ° ~LL o V S u N n J z .. ~,~ .... ........ a .... .... .. z rc a`m ~¢.. ¢ ¢¢ ms o a¢ ¢¢ ~ ao xx LS xF i Ws FS xi :n x ~~ oouo n`u : oo ~a~ p i <nN iz ~. ~~ ..1 uU W,.~ uW <ww, h Wu ,.1 wN W woW < >W ~u< iW wl,i J oo .. o J :. mJ6~ r .uLY tiU KOUp - ¢~ 01'¢ JV~VW ¢ ~¢wyYwTw¢ •VII ~- L a 2 www w UYMNrLL N¢F 7~ aL~n Wti ¢ZJU¢ pVbYj¢fVV+~YpJiw=jr i-JYU< Yr ,2 Sw~L¢ w2J wU~7p U¢ZL )V 6pJW NF SV J.Jp< ¢ Oi~+wL¢ .nm aU,v r+ r ~~w"~.'.wi ~<m p~oWOwrm„o"oi~ '~"Y N'i i'mn~if .xyoN moi~~p Y~z zl-L P 2m ` .. °a~WaJ.~ ¢^..¢o. w,. ., m '.'.''.<o,. isYi w'.`J ,.. ,..°.z .. ,. x.. _z. ,'~,J.. u, 0'-`„6.. ¢i~w~~H ~u <•..6 ¢a z zo~u'i¢wuYp iacw i 2.n ua w¢ ,- ~.n+~L6 w.n p'n o¢upw ie ¢u. ~N.. J li m' ~~. ~2 o _ n o.> p~j YILV f ,-Lip .+Z Vp U i pRle ^l n~.,i Y uJJ UN M V i ¢4 <-~ ,= S ~nJY¢<V 9Jw rjw.n V9~ w ¢¢ py ¢ wp 26U~ T ~ U¢ryz ~ ¢'u< Opp¢r~u¢ ~pa¢VUwri w=Fwaw n2~U~-LNw T.UU62lw 6LrL2 4~LS ,~ <2u< rVON •¢N< «6rV LNr n'0. JL i ~yWVVVw rw¢pw ~ wF wu< m y~'uiw a~J .. ,,, zzL x p,..opzzz~~.~J ii ~ {pm ~JV u KJWmUra=Up„p,n rVflLipwar. < ~1 r U r,¢rYFF>6R<l<J<mVYY wry ti YJ J~YWw>W ~ yl¢r Jww r70Jp~~i¢r. V'J¢¢pt ,nN¢Jp~mJ wfw m rt¢IVVVV~VyUUVUt~VUVUUp<ppmppLUwWmmuuLL~nu uLV w l JamNn mi-JPYrY wnYP~`ar 6~ mmPrVULi`-rUnn m .p4 a ~? opWOOO r~-oooorooProoooorooomrorrmomooao •i oorvPOUa oooaoo a-•oommm..o mm.-••maaotJmrmPm m ..u .: imuoomcimu r,ni rim,irvil.. rlvi yr.~F~.: oomrv m ~..rn m.w. ry.m.i romm~P,nmrry 'ntinNnnrou'~n.°.N ~ ¢i 6 _ N < 1 S 4 Ui-mPV•nNm Tina mPV.+NmrWarmPO•'~nmrNarmPNryNmrm mmmmFn FPPPFnFFP0000000000-~•~•~^^^^^ M11n NN i ai r mmmmmmm~m~ammWmmmmmmmmmmmm 1 .°..a. a„ a ti a ° :°. aNO .a..a. •°..a.. ~ a .a..a+.a. .a..°. •a. ~ a.°. a .a..a..a..a..a. .a..a..a..a..aia. J i i .. .. .... .. .. ...... .. .. V °° ' o w ww ~,i iWwww J n L •~i `L •~ %m~ •n rru~v rn °s u ware +oau m areas .at,i xnn L wiz r:wi Lazii LimC)O W 4R ~V u00-~O ml mY Z ay Ww ~ u lIY Pmu.lUu Su tY nJaa O air O ~nV ¢R OOn ~<O rU4 6U¢ 2 J 3u Ja SUP imUU <riw U ¢ Ow JwRrv wai72 mLY YNmm K aO~+tYwr ao No .°. i.~a~o we inn ~.. i ~-» axw~~m K Ui¢O~ <w <O.wn 'J Law Urn t<JL~aU .~JU rS N~=u JE -~~ZJ ~OxJ .yLLU tJtt6.i ¢rn w¢2u ¢Vrn tJ Ja102wadJ¢7r+<~Ym wPOOL•'I aJU.) 72KNL< ij mua9U ~u 2 1¢ r?rn a6 m~aw¢j r JS Y~ •LUrL29rJY±wJ7JOKw6 rrn Uaw I ~~~~~.o„WwoozQ~z °a .~.~w~wai ,m.,s ow r .KJa~:i.na~a ~n~~u°:moar=a3.in~aa~N.<~:d~a n i n w ~~ I Vu ~ LZ ~J r- •~ ¢t i< r f i w 2 i t- >w<U•^nY a rn I ie )J¢vNS _ Jz A6¢rZwO?J YUw7w >rmn x vYw Nw U _ Vy ~~SOnUtw ~2 L6~LL 2rn O< SK2 Y1J[> ~U UUyi¢ ~? wi ~ OwK ¢6J t)~SUw nUa• <2 2¢ ~>IWULY v~OwwaW'v< VZ2w V~9nr< [ ¢2 U'Iww NrP-prw L-~>L iUWL >ti 2 ~-WwUY LN U6w 6ha2u 7w wti Lm~~LY~JO ZY PV w JJ2~ aJ ~RUUU>Iyw.~izYx ir+ZSOi, < rwnV`ai JW Z< wy YlL¢7 wJ z< urZFwpU Nii ¢f_r+VO • (w 1¢ JwYO •ti iU (f<O. x aOMa a~n .t< •tZ p ~+LJYYJ~LJ-~CZZi¢LinL 1i Pa< 61a6~YRl •~ Ymt-Nmmro NPNmryGWarna NWtirv rlnmWrn Ura~P WYU I r •~Or aN-JO wOmNr•tV UPrOa~+-• tl m ^Yr' 3 m~a om+oam.aurvoooorom mmso~-oorvm ..°uomaomrnmoaovaorv n~-or-r omoo~o-. r Y~ ,-r ryPmnaaU0P000~"+ONOam00UP„mOYr { 1 rymmLmnUa 00ry~n .~a mON nr0 N ON _ PN NI-r1ry00 Pao rym u K 1 .~ d a i n .~ P.~a rv.~ r 0 1 !t 1 ai-NPm~ ~-OPOn mlOantOPO.+NmrOarv a ry rvmammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm s• a y .mo a .a....a. ~° .°. ~.a. ,a..a..a..a..a. N .a..a..a. a ~ ti'~°.a..a..a. a a ti a a i u m rc i sa uoo o KO ~ ~.1 ~. r,l r.~ i.l ~.1 ~'~ ' Z V N V U N wi< J Vl Vr¢ F. p l <r~JU ,,~~~ < V w VUW mN ~ 6w Y 1 t]J 4~~-LZ w7w~i w < Owl w KO~C06nV<Y w .J FraUR ao WVmJ _ ~w.wi~wi CZ1 f-W¢~Y ~ rOZ¢J Ur-W=rp w.Zi V V rw J ZYU wJ>w~~woV<w Ouw.~ZLw * 2~7w26i RSZr mw rn ~ i.ur-~9~Za Yin 'IY U~'ImaVJ VJ ~t6 ajSUKSOruU K6r,~ ~ ~i iV ~ V VV ODw U O 6 .+F ~uw i m w O d wJ ti6 C Z J n _ _ `n ?Z a r-i J--Zr26.~ u wY J .~ .~ ~r wR Jfl ~ uu Vin .9 Y~-r-~W KOK rmwow¢a~ur•.i uwi:i ~m 'ia p'os ~ ~ fop azo zo~Y.~cio '"zrs LJ zwiz ~uiiJ.riso io"uM~. ..9 zLZ .. wtpHwNw L'tx N Y~il ~-r ~pU¢ V6 FjJjwXY1 O r„mY!<Lw ZVJJ Vw pr 6~n 0¢ u(a[.kK¢pr~v~~~nN~~v~~~iNOVrN~VrLJ ~'~i~n 3% Ai - mmnnmtiaamW O.~a PN~+O nn aPV .,u.. .oo mw PrvnNP '~~°v ,.P,° .. ..n .. .. .. ,.".'.N... .~ "' .. .. ~N~» .9 x 0 o r o oPOaonmomo rv..o°aomooaoomorUO..o •~ 0 0 0 oao+nrooro an,o°opaomnorn~.aooNrv •• i i r p r •omonr at o,no a~ou~oaoorm+r n,.:arymm .; a m rmNmmrPa..o miP:omoamoo+ ~ ¢ ~ a i mo ~.. oam°r..mPn :.. s i i i m .. +.a n ^m .. ,.~ .~ t~ 2 Z1 NPN+~FSiPrmPO^n~rl r is ,>O~mPp^Nm+marmP O,n n r,l+m 8r ~ n .. +mmmaaaaaaaaaa^^rr^rrr^rmmmmmmmm oirrrrrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm z ~ .°..a..a..a..a..a..a..a..a..a..a..a. a.°..a..a..°. .a. ti .a..a..a. ° .a..a..a..°..a..a..a..°. n .°..a.~ .a. -°~.a..ai .°..a. v i i i ~ ~ .. .. ~¢ x i ~ m u mic^o ¢ rc,n N o ¢~ mo ¢iw x ww~i W .. o i Y 0o r z "' ao iwx s ii~x..ww i i' W a mmo °v s.. °. ¢w.. ¢¢°~z~. ' < ~ <uo^ ziWUimiupW sz o w a n.ni pi.,u ow°.. s^nWfJ° ° 1 ~¢ ZL^f 6:J ,nom .~ <~n •1 u Uv, wm0 ~<.~n¢2w¢OM ±~n:0{V C ~ <o °a 6.n ¢wm 6.n~¢Wr¢wr rv,wnn >s~ ~ Wo¢z i<WmwW~W6 W ~w Z¢ry ~.v uV¢V w ^ K~nZww UV~'• ^¢L w Mr.n Y6wZww`Ur r r < rcaw3., .¢. `x Nwaz+ cf¢o o z ^ L w ¢ w ran MVmw;o62`^Y<t{ • ,n JUpOOm 6¢ Yp ¢OJ~Ow O j p 6 JZwwJ2< °~UUY¢wC¢]^O ,7Vmr<O Z < ~ °Z r r~-,2°OwwSSpw °'¢uu°i,niu `6V2~n pty ~.NY6H J V u „l u ~.°n~ppr V¢ >mHU°Um¢¢yZSyw¢VJ,nm ¢ G Vj < J2 U i O HJ u U n V ~ ¢ ^~ O N Y ¢ ° V Sin °Uf' V2 w ¢ 6 e l OU N w r ar .e i ~ w z w mw ; i w °z ° i i .~ w ~ °.z, Niu~ina~2.l aJ~~°`z¢ _ u z °> j wxwWU< zoz ,-~ O N V¢ tU6 ~V°<OVZ,^~•2n im°6J~+V6 ~ w w°wm J i ern i W•+zzwz m,,.Ww W<z¢a J. ¢°~°n u,'~:~~„~~.r~" z u r °¢.n ..p zW¢u_~ <a<«< mmmmnmmmWUW ~~ poNr:Wwmna o.. ,~nmrN N,.. ,.ir ro.. ~oarm ¢ i + mmPmr. m..rr - m i .. a .. '" .. „ a. m r tir.::larr. .. _. r. m ~ m .. m .. .. V 1 oa..oaNN000ONnmompaPmo or-Nor-mm:POroo•.oooaN r~ OmpNOmPmOPmONNmOnmrmpOOnryYYmNryNONOUN000wr N namtiV P.+NOanNmmpONmOrymmON.~m Y.n •O mOPN0000Jnry ymNOmnmOPm Nrrlm NaN^~PmJ~mrN~NNYOnryryry yt OC 1 N Y r.y .~ .n ^ ry m .+ i1 mr 0 OL !i mPOmNmYNanmP O..NmrNWnmPOtiNmrNan mP O.~rymrNanm 21 mmm00m~mOmmmPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPpPPPPPpPpPPPP 21 nai.ai.aiaiaiaain.Ninti.~.~.aia.ai.~.~tiai.aim n.anti ti.~.~.ai n.ai .nai n.m-,ntiwarn J 1 ti m V I _N >InNN Z wL N W ww Pw ww m wN ^ V x INI 7 ~ ,nr V~.ri<~N N~ n .n ~-. rn .-. ~r-.-.;ON ¢ ~ V m C6 R¢O¢¢K<N ¢¢V !¢ ¢¢6 ¢m\b o wi`F=W W wt N,>n z< Fs^FFUr xs¢ .rF zzxNN mW ~u a`ou¢r~ooooomr o uo o`o oil orY .~. 0o r.. r~wms ¢ ry ~ WWawWWwWWWN~ WWNpwW ,.IW WZO niW~7 J9N u .~., w UO nU zo wzaNw orris ~~., zm . °=,°r~a~ ms z"g~ a.. w N n 1 OJ O%FO~ mKSti OU<JL UPYZ' w Om< 06 1 x<Y w^UwOIw- Nwr¢ UL N~-O X„u0101LLw u.~.i O O~.Ui V ~ ¢OwOn~YWN20 Nw L N.urO Zen _ ~°° Ir O 1• .y J~-V wry 2042F.^w 26 AOON r6< 1-O~-.FO N~OO y¢N_wV <„2.~<w =LOLLUwW YDw rv. W mV:I- wNr wV<„w<R Nw¢Sfwm: rVp~¢w¢ U1..~<~YV VY RJO}NU6w0¢umw2 rww0~¢}>2 <~ .¢< <wZ~V'Om mY2 Zn w¢Jn¢Z< y¢J~ ~NLLwN6 2LLL2J¢ZZ ~W¢mdJ 6F•nOiw m< fx <i.+u06~vWrw ¢iu Z u0~ yuM1.n wm r w2Kwww2%ZO<u. rv. ° w tZwN ¢wWwYU uu~w°s°,<,..<,rcNr,nl-°r¢¢w wl-mxsr °°}aum~zLL<~N~¢< ¢¢ a 000 % ,, ~ amo wuw z,w zo ," i.u. .. :Ni m ,.,~ ,~ _w iu', z~NSi ziio ~VrN_ ~ Y 4 .)1. Vm i U ¢Vr. a¢ >.12~ u ~s.m rrvN ti V ['Irmo n~lr.n ~ .~ ~~ C'J rt. '.2Z , <w'^ ^ZIMwY Vi N NS1¢ ~w ooo~r u,U< O r •~w S'+a< ZU6w RL6Ny Z ZnHLUi¢ p OO¢Sw¢ _ 20N ¢r. i'n J > w6wL000V U LLi~~o¢`uoi~¢„1ZUUn wo..o n>L zaa rw.`-.a wwwJ~ n ° iua o.<-u z`~~o<«ou ..~oii~ws<uu, : r w¢¢ uw awa ¢ uw¢~.iizi~ - wJ z2 saw 2L~Vpm.I<V~O~ z.r a.-i %w aio~~".ziaz w <a w z <o wwwsy ~•'io uuriun~ wu66mtx ooixwww wFZW ~ x wY¢aw «<o u.-r-z rr-~ zz~w W~~~ . woz r zix.~ WuzwrNNw....~wzsz<<w~i ¢.. ~.-.~~zm Fwwrx<z.-~•.~<ooN»oJZOWWW.. ooww¢nrc<w..o ao° VVVVOVVUUUV r u,w mu uVYUU<SLLZLZZ.ni f.NWw YYOmyrmNmryNrmmP~+'DmmWrvnn ,-aNrvYmOP w.r~ am nr urvnwN um.. i.n+~r m oomooOOhoooom mrvomomrvoooDOOOaooo N., ..o morvop .~ PPNNOOmm00000m1mO0aPlmONOp00.•O IN.OryNamYTmO m S m~ampry!lOOPOm mm.-~ONdhmOamOOPOmOarvhhmPMOrvY `1 N m~N~hl~rvnmmrv P•'~m aNN.•Prymmm OO aPTNmN a'fNNnm NiNO ¢ 1 .~ .• w N ~• w .+ m m N 6 < I .• 31 I Z 61 POmmmlNmhmmO~rv m+NtMlPO.~INmlN ahmPO.•NmlNahmP PI N m ! !+ ! !N N NNNNaaaaaaaaad 1 pPPPP PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP i 1 .a•.a. » .ai .a..a..a. an .°. na n .a.• .°..a. N .a. ti .a..a..a..°..a..a. a :°.d..°. .a..d..a. ,a..a. aa..d. d:°..d..a..a..d. ~ 1 w ti ~• u s i wr~i. wWW wWw a s N '• ~x w 0 0 » wi °r ¢.. u .~.'.. a .. .. .. .. s .. .~ z zo ¢ i ¢i¢ .¢¢r.¢z N ¢WO ¢ u a ¢r¢ ~ J¢ ¢ i ¢ x J.¢x Luigi z o Smxxiw ~x ¢ w : .m `D uao¢o°ON •~ °i.~-. D ° I a°xlo w.. ID¢o ; o 1-ulU 0u41 u,V 0< Wwh W ¢ WVW W~2 W ~ 6u N uw M1•~ti N O w JF02WN¢ n¢R rv¢ J ww . >N 2D MWO vl a••w•nN 01 « h N xJ ~ IwN:R S %V LO°rv2> NAG ~Dwp ~ SiW i iM1N w~wi•r •r 06¢~°miN ~wVwW07 lror m1oDx ~ra JJ>Ow0<DSWLLNVai%uw•~+Z O<O V ~J.• 3 Ow i<L¢ 6wOmnwwV N•"~O¢ S6 FL u 26 Jm h u>pJww Ow ~o J¢O w2wwJwWO6tu ZYR2J pJ < V ¢ J Nw0?w uJw02Yi0u~ >w•~LL wN V.~nO>~DU¢ JWw`NnY>OVJOl30wNJU¢K¢O.uiwNVN H2m tii6 Nywxa w>UO¢JN'~° JNN 616'Y¢<.~OVS¢O°j V~WNLxrv.2iN6o0¢pOwN~VdSYriirvN I S O~ J N r_t w VV¢¢ p N J~ F n< J. OS 6V \u •6 rw a i n ~ aZ~n 9yyy '"~ 2V ~i 'N]V J r~ .Y -U~ LSO .nr L¢r.•a 1 ~J ~ S 222 JwN¢S Z LLOwKOW9V w_~] O ~OZ6Y¢x L7 wF w'N •nr pOI=O 6¢2LL Lp¢ ^aZja'`Vrtn ON J h w.r• '~ 6 = Val OL 4O Y6¢1Z ~ZNO 6 anw `o aY x ° LLWV "aawD Jwwwa.+ z :tl~,.J i., ~., .iazWN 'u °.z. `i '¢e".z.°aL n..J i.~.N+°N° n ~ jw ~'..+~„ .. JJO¢NZ ~°n i....xia..u a=wN ., o°ouWU Jn~DW iJN uaa:ii°¢~-<..L n°ars°..W~a. iliii izzzwowY irc ° .a.Vi..o ¢NwwDDpi as<a°66~ Lrrr. •+l ly YJJJJLixxi2 LZ<I22ZZZOLLp66 ~+ NJwONM1 N.•OhaOVNNaPNPhn NPhYaP WI-lNVa 'Y1 .v •IPNNhNN Upi~trvN~~ldv+hrv~h~d SryOYPOJ 7 o....moroaN a..onoamoooo+romar+oompPnmoomvomo aaPPO a....Paooooarompvvm..amraoo .~omnoom+aoPo Y `I ~~I~.rmFmFNPmFPmNrNNUnJrP+YPY0000nO+OmNaNaO 1 amrym.+amrv„NOm m mNlmmryarv+PmwnraOYamOm n n D.' 1 m H m N .~ m m .~ .+ 6 =; N 1 Z ;I OFNmJ'^FaPmti~mYmammPO.yNm YmarmPOnNm+w.p l-mP0 mmPPPPPPPPPP000000000pN i ¢I aaaPa aooaeaoa a.oouaooaoaoaoaa:va PV OOOOOOOOOOo W s i .....~ .......................~..........tin..n.... n...... ~.. n................ ou i = I w L wL x ZLLW mN YI~W u L ~Ur 2 r w ti NYrrNnOJ ¢ H K ¢p6¢ O¢Q IX2m¢¢¢¢^WV W`¢ " ¢ I wOw _w _ __ _ ___ ~Ow O Ow 61-w2 J N `YI O¢NO VX~.Zr o ti<HOpoo ~ Noo Om o00^HFr WHOOrm~ O ;wY i +60 O<N N¢ W w¢aW JL~Oi~ WW WuwWWWWPi ¢uW";O ~; OLU lS0 QxNM '~O V2Fw W_9 u1w _ OU< ~ r~Oryr ~¢1r+ JN T<> •Zw OM1 uwUK NopW ~¢N a .-i xo ~i~- uw N¢ a..a~inw~ .z.J No .o~~zo~~.,m" wTlu rzow i'z rs~wmiw i.w-~p r~ 'u ~v~m iri zi .w,,;¢.J. ~`~rii~s ooz> I>r W..W `x.`. 70< ¢+~~~U JO¢ <_~-ZQx6N NZ NxwN rK OJJZN O ¢ ZO JG~OZH wW622 w¢6YH~~ 6UV'O¢ M1 ~+~w ~+22JN wU<YNQ <ZOw¢w wU<fJ a~ n'pwi6 UOJ ~ZO <¢YU wKL2 S OZZ 6¢O wl ON O.O~ r2'~ r¢JOr+KUNO<¢<OJOUSrfr~¢nw6K00 mZjOjJ`nmOw6j¢ Fyw gx j¢2QZ ti2¢N~Vr2 o»oi~. iiHZ zuNLLi~is~n`uNV¢o=~'. -~~ix Apo « ozofww~ ~'u.wxi`QiJ<JO.a~'af¢~~`L ism me.mu °.2+~u <.~oaz¢..vs~°ia x J nOO VUUV V 22ZL Z N t/V Vti ONOO V VV < 12 a 77 OOpp 6 Lo www N¢ .L m ¢QO LU Uo V Z fL U L ¢ wOOm V`^NH~M~W ~+M1 7J 6' ST J 21<~O¢ ~"YLJOG J.Yi2 <~- WZO~~~w< UZU VZ O~ »' rVJL[tr ¢ZUOi+ru+rwr r.<2< JO O i OJ ~~ r0 U)w7 ¢~nQ:JahONV LV u O KZyJ ~x m77¢¢LrUO Q <V 2¢ rVNY r¢ 6¢ V~ 9 •V VUVO Ow~ wNN O QM1 ODYN ~T ~+O`OOM1U<.~<~SZ wWwH~U¢¢ 22N~N~ i fLf p' << ~ rGF <i-S OJ ¢t ¢¢Ry~O Z)'NNO~¢; r6 JG r~VNww<~rVUJJ wJ20iJ ..¢Nmxpx ¢mmNO iiiixsu~ <aw°N J wiJ ..z pr iv L~~uJI-F.-.1-.-z<".N WQ¢ m z~rcv`Fz iHU <w .. FaNNNN..o oppopowpi~<w x.. c~`¢a N..o ¢z`<¢`¢¢`¢¢al¢NN N SNNNNNNNVNtiNrh'..-~I-r»~ i~ ..o+NOmw mN.rr r~-mNmmP+armom.. Gi I"ONmnmYn .4PYmmrrymOYmN+ W mvJ~rva mad mmmmr nam nNm+ 8 mpmp00 LL~ iI JOB t10 (v TN~ QI 2 OOJCO i I .~.~.~n H.~ J U iL ~i V J t ~+~+ J 2¢ 6 SS 7Z JW tiW ^ Y wt 26 ` rV d: ~'S ~ V R7~ JJn rn . 7~, J~iO shwa Y n T '~ ]2u~ ifza ~ ..u~ ~i~i iiiiii rvo~ M.w'rw. WVy.ww~~wr. aay H911~A11011 Ip •l[OIIOSIC ~19~AM SlDMrlq I. rYlNSI d IKIM[ISI M I M O. Tr Do9~wr AI Abolw9e SworaoM Cwwd IN01 •nd'nt! alno c.. wrw A WJ GC~rA4 u T c E S ~e t ~"/Ol~ Ar ~,~,vdEU ,ww...ow.w. ~.....~ r C Pu c ~~ w s a~~..~ ~i.E.':~w I...l ]. NAAYIQ d AINCANTry) TwNr. Iorail NLN9YL~, wrrlHeo s. Aw~Nro OPr ~~A/OS ~ lNodin Dorn ]. 11'/yS) d TSAIgeCDGM ISI fR UC. T9PF re9., ne. ~ iw.oD AT ~+ u l Nwr M Wrlnr PinD ie0t9L'A NlotorAnto 1 larAYtn N FNnwr-Nttiw wa Sllwr 1001) 2. eN ot. 9to 'D• CYf wM DI C~io CwM9 MrNNe Cue 91T 0 w ifJ<Al fIDu.iD d N hondr lionwd, ___ ). M hrwwr Mrli roA 9. Nen Loa nar bow aMialod M o 1o4ry1 10. Non A. wer dolebd wry M drr Irdorn M Nw AkMe9t Sa.woEe Cwwd M w N9olor^r of M OoPwnaew fon rrliq n Nb Atli I1. [Yldn .'YR" wuw. b Nne v w Ib aw w onwbbow .Men rnell r Mowd Pwr d Mr oPPEteNOn. I1. Applkaw gron lol Nbr am wwwEV ornlorM h .nnolo II<«wd pww.w .Nr n....n M.. Iry,.INr.wpV M n Fn-.ea. aid Ibl rM M .ill r rwleb w awnM .iII w aww w~b w MMwN~N Nb~d Nb AkMWa~Conw1 Anw MMwN~N IM~d Ma AkMWa~Connl An. /]A/Bi I]. SLATE d CAINOENIA [wary M ...__ilD_YfA9Eptm______________Dr_...._._..._.____.._....__.. u-A. r..in + .... -rw nr• .rr~. ~r r ... ~~ a... w wb.... ... w.,~.. • r ..o... ~.....~~ _w r..w.a r`w . ww .~aa•r . _ .. vw ,a. a ... n nM+.w w. w4 ~. w. Ji M M1 •. M ~tinwa rew N.q wn ~/..n•.~ •wnM nti•~ ~ Hwr +Y~ n Mnlr h iM ~ -.n y M rr n .r +M. w~~w ~Nw M1 Pn•n~n~ • n+YL • wMww~. x w I rm Mi•A ~ • u<!r• ~ w.ntiw. iIr ~Iw h nw.M~ M.r+.w ~. 4 •~w4•« rr n4 M wMn•+ • w 4n~n _.w ... n.M~ry,iwAM1 It AMLIUNT SIGN H(E! ___..... ........ ..... .... ................................... .................,. { AMIICATlON t1 iI1~Nff~ll0l I] ]TATf O( CAUgRNA Cwnry of-... 9An wrn.rdtlw )/tn~~' ... . .............._0.b......__._______._.._...... r M rr ~Nn .~ M.o ~ wr ~w .~ Yn.aN Mw h w/+w wa N yyn•i.w ~w.n+<n w.n •+. Yr..M~a M'4r ~ +~.^.N~ ~W1 ~M ~O.nrrv.n .I nwMw . w YM1wt ~ r~.w~ w wn~ M ti ~ N awn ~r ~ _,n4<• \r nrr ~w 4a~ •'r wn~ _A ~n m./r+< iwxrr v M1 O+rwn~ ANe<badr ^ LwwdN rko, ^_ /NwlarT ooPwr. _, bn.al: nn d....... _...h11 OSko w......_..____.., Rw«p No, /J1 ..~. W .Ya Wntr MIaP TAr Linn for DrfeNnml L'w fhdy h a~~ ~u ~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ N f/7 ~ J N c`! Q s ~ ~~~ ~~ ~I w' ~I ~~ ~'`~ ~I s ~~ 4 }` a ~ i ~~~'s w~ ~ ~ M ~ y v~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~1~4 u N r G u „ . , ° ~~; r-~-~ ~• _~ ~ J o N 0 ~ C C ~ i u ~ o° ~e ~ f O1 C3 ~~ 3 -.:_ :.._-_._ ~, ~7 ,~ ;~i a _ 1 _ ~ ~ e ~ j e _...r - ... .._ .._... _._ i i o ~ i. I: z c.. a . `'~ e ^ I!I o Q 2 ~ ' ~ Z u~ ail o 0 fii i~~j •i ~. ,E 1 ~~ ~ ~,' 1• i ~ _= ( I ~' 1~~ i $S ~~`,:~ i(~ i ..~-s {rt ;'.1.~"-~ 1, ~ N 'i v yell: ~ ~ ~ ANe1CAlIRN NM NCpg51t feyfYM Srcwlwlf) I lYK(sl Of IICEN3N31 NlF NO. -- w D+rnRR+r+ w ArgA+q< e.rww. cea.d RECFVf ND. Ivor rwa.y - >•n•...:.:.~ '°' ...... _Awlft. : • •._, se~.rw, car. s5eu . eFOeeARrecu _ : . n..:.. w...., l~,.u - .:tclx,.,;• GOOF ~~aF ~.vbr~ rr t.n :I; E:- DsN Eer~ lal lewd ]. NAA(fAfl a Af111FANfle) Trp. Irrrril Ayy/M rmdw Sw. ]pU ~ ..t... ... awc: Jw Ja M+elw DMw Is..,,:i,w2• ERw<an Deer: 5. TrfF131 Of TRANSACIN)NI31 ~ tK. T11F K~ 3 ..wl Si A Nrv d R:rAiw x la<aRen d Fdrrc+r-Nwrbw aM Slr<w )l.i :..o<..ill al ~.. City aM W Ceb Cgrar f :.i~mrny yt r3,. -:. eT..l ~.. tOTAI ). MrrwMx<In<Y< Sse. Tyq d li<wnr a -LAY aJ r :: I .. Ciry Lmint e. Alders Ada.. nr aiRwrnr Erwa xl-N.rw.. wr SM« ~ ..rr:r...r 9. Nan Yer.... e..n <ami<wd a a IrbnyE 10. Nan fee r.rr rlelaird arty d NN Warium<.a ~M< AkaeL< Mnraer Cemrol M w rraalasam d Mr D.psnm.nr q.- ainirp ro Mr A<YI I I. E.plain a "Y!s" anrw b ibmr V w 10 en en aM<emrm ~er<e Mall a drrmN pare d Mil oppli<olion. 12. ApplNeni eQrw lel feel aa1 meroyv rnrplrrM n arvw4 liwnud wrmrrrr wel Mrr oll Mr ywliR<armn+ el a Ikmrn, aed fel rner M will mr meleb w <ww w pMmN b M NelaM any of Me prorluen< el Ma AI<daie Mrarear Cenral Arr U. STA1F Of CAIIfORN1A Cwnry d ..... .... ....... .'.....--.-......Dab...---._.----..._...-...- .rn mar I .n r~..an w w+.. .Mw M .u wMUn .. i , v xMrwr M _ nn.r.ry ti .r n.w~ / :....,4. wl~ N..n. ..enna x.:i: n....n, e. ~ ~.e..~. e, nM. M wi~r.. .. .r rrr.w .nn -e •.,. • .w:... ~ I+ ARRICANi SIGN NERE ~ .--..... •• " •' '' AMIICATION R~r TRANfRROR Is, STATE OF CAIIfORNIA County el._.._._.-_._._.. _.-_.-..-..... Darr ......... _ ................. ..r,.......y .mm -.n m ..w y wu•. .. n.os:..n~ .. nre.r . ,..,,... n. n. n..n« wi..... ~.. w ...e._. e........ Id Npmepi pl L<enuNtl lI s:anab.NO el llunw6l le. L<env NomEn41 I 19 1«eew Numbw aM SMrr Ciry and Iip Code Covry Do Nat WNIe Rrlom ih4 Line; Fw Drperrmrnr l'rc Only ANaard: "Rwwdrd .ea<e, ._ IH«ian qqn. n ........................._-....__.......-......_COhES NulFO .....-......................__._ __.. _ R.MwL. in d--~-~ ~---".fak d.-~""-~ ~a ............... ORq m..... .......... beNpi Na sTcc ~ MIRkE7~~IBYai2 ~~ rcv: 91~y Fmrvii< CMS. -~ Dl~.~,~) i PROt3,¢Ty ~ ~ • zvTLY i wL I7WLR~L ~--DWr~a KtCpt , !(~~~ ~NG OC ~EQSQC£NT I~?GiYP7: w o l~eeru. fotu Q49[~Fiv7f.tc m~~ ,~,; '/ /~ •Sl~W7N = ~tdLla.-tlF(fCF/ RZS.IU (.N T/~IL •n m -oo i 9 F EAST M {{~~ ME(j~W'~. t~t5/OfUi~AL CAA: gAr'T, ~ ~ rv 9 n c ~~ lD T S fv p .~ ~ ._ N N l0 p m n i m ~8~' .o ~~ ~' :; z =n x ~ :n r x n ~ S u J g I~ /3 i COPY._.,.~._..,..~.. ____. ANIIEAIIOM IOf tt[YIEpIC YVWYE EEEt]Ittlf) I. IYfN51 W OCENSry51 RlF ND. Tv, lletnrr_ J AAaMd4 En+rett Cad,d IWI ieawy bl SiFL6 GAW1L IIECfVt NO. ]}0246 SmvMdt, Cll. Eltlt ---tl ~ ~w. w.,.. runr~ PUBLIC PF1ax56 G[OGRAfItGEI ]615 c ~ M m,4rtrrlM Mr.61 ^/fAr Ei lrY«~tCitE/ME./I06 {'llE ll ~lI1Gr! 0el i }. ESA51f13) a A/IIECXdE17) . EIap. Ilrw1 AfyWd undv Srt i40Y p [IleaMr oeln xtfu.nc. Ell..... Delp xe.aaeu. xdlcD, vm. ]. r]Eg5) a ObW]ACIIOEy]) ~ lK. }yam C1A[t LteD, 64e./]'tett. P4[. IYf. i:50.UD '! pIPLICATE 4TB,U0 .. E/vnu d tviibb x l«eEen d trru Stew City wld Lv Cadt Cwmh roru 5 v. e. IsernEe. }. An mmiE.. mEiN SMw }Ype d 1iEenr a}~D6]e5E Ciry limits Et, t Aldliry Addreh lil di6«enl barn 51-NUnb.. «Id sn..l .-.r ..._r ~. 9 Har you .r« b.r acmiolsd d a IebnYi 10. FFm yeu «« Kebbd om d Mh paridem kdwlk / ~_ Eersrets Cemrd ul w ryvkxern el dh DEpvrhrrr p«~ I I. Eylain a "}ES"Mrw, b ibmr v w 10 w on onzhmm .M1isF EFall b dwmM pwt W IFis applitonan. 1}, Applkom ot,_ lel ba arh merwp, empleyM in on~wM liotn«d pnmih, .ill Far. nll dh gwliR.mwm d a FrnrE end fbl rMr M will _ rielah w tour w p«mil h a wdeM any el do pawvom al rFE Akobolis Mvsrvtt Cmmol Am. I1 S1Aif Of <AIIfOI1NIA Cwnh d _Btn Yt.ru•d1w+ .................Oab __.J1MLB7...____.___ ~mr n.w n4 ~t «•.w,. .«www ~ nMr~M n«nM. f nn ~... u.... a ~~ne.~• b r.mr ~m eMnor .. ~~ n.. M .,n .. n~. • .4r..r r e.. i ~,~sER-ou.m' ' ~ ~ nrrn n. ,.w.. .nrrvr ~ . Id ~AfhICANE~-~~ . / ~~'~ -... ..... ... .. SIGN XEEE . ..... ........._IA[. 1._[xC... ... _.. ._... __ __ ............... r3 AMIICATION ~1' T~ANSiEROR I] $iA}E Of CAIIEOPNIA Cavnh of ... jAD.t~tMShcpO ~---. Dah .__.3(]0/81.. ..... w +M'~. ._~.~ .m.......w ~...... ...w -..n. • .w.u .. n. ~en......~ '. ~i.ar...r ....n... .. n. ....d..rr..e.. ~a r ..u..~. a ..... 16 Nomngl 0140 ,ado Ix. S~anvmnlrr of U<emMrl IE. Lu • NvmbaNl ~_ SAY91. iW. IPY. S ~ Il~n[le[f Iv t«oben NumEVr eM Shr« Gry one x:p code Ceunry Dn .VOI Wnle Prlar FAu Linr: Fa Drpntlmrnl V« Odq Ane.Me~ E«wene nets., '~ /iduNery pawn, ^ ...................................`/.y.//,.........._COErES mARED ,...7L11/.97...... _.... _..... _._ ^ fenewal sw d Ieid a nwE., / / ORn en .. .. t«eiq Ne MOTEL bb Q io i ao' CIRCLE K I 10134 ~ I Ram' ~ouo ~___.1 ~ r~u6 HIGH BROW lous~o. 1013'•/ FaOTHILt . n ci_ f ll PzorCRrY PeLStN'7~/~oNS: GENE.2AL COMIN£O~wFI-- ~ON(N9 O1~ A~AGt.~7 T{r:o~JtIP.TY ~ ~' ~C_' f~ESll7/vT.9L No~rH . ,_ . So~rK: OF~i~t j~rRvFES~(cr!;,~,, Lq s j 6eNCRAL COMM£RlCAL I~ ~~ ~. S j Cj EN £ R A L. C o MMf.f (.C61 L ~S COPY__--- - ..~ ___ A/MIICAIIRN NIR iRIORIM119C .9.A« SICMMN 1. rs'RESI p IKENEry31 RlE h1O. r« o.yw.w+.E AlwhalE 9Rw<49R rwiM,d INI •444ny ayr 9w Sm1 i r3R NcEMr Nq. 310319 SaaaNw. faY. 9!919 N. u....w <.... ,werwrewrnw.e..nE.~ OIO~Cu C099 ~ ~<191bd ~I YLSu ~ T+Lrlbniid~Ai9we 4b iii9 3. iRAMNA a A9NKAM(R rwyi E..o SLE.t3199[ 9Neli L. i CNr1N [. A~w6.d. s.A. ]u6d ^ 994dw ab Ble<in OW: ]. IT9R5) p iRANSACrI0N1S) N9 tK. TER 3 l h!aw d win.. s. li<aiin a win..-N.rw ela si.. 0661 9A9911N Giy W T'V Cadi CwMy PLneM • 917]0 Sul 94[niidlN TOTAI j T. An rr.mneE mw Shims Iyp d Lignr 30-19935] Ciry libiii 6. Mawr Aedni rr awnnE 64. n-flw. iea Sy.w ~ ....I„ ~...., 9. Mew yw e... bim <gniabd d w r.p.bliam eE IM O.parMnnl Vw. !1- I I, Eylan a "RL" emwl b iMm 9 w 10 en w ells<MneM whi<Ir iwll M dawned q.l a Mil appli[elian. 13. AAgNb gMEiE (41 Mq Ln1 bslbp< em0141'id M LM<ile !aimed qunb< .All here all Me qusF6<alom a e Ileem«, oM ibl Iha M .ill mR riolob w <wei w Moil b 4 mlaM wIY of Nn Rri+iwm a IM A4Md'u w.wi94 Cemrol All. _ ^. STATE Of C41f0IIN1A [wMry'el ._-SEiP-.Mm9]Alm ........... ....Dm....____94W1_..__..... Nn mn. N .v ww+/ ~ x.n ~)~ <. ~Yn~n ~ ~rNr. w.e~w n~L . wnn~ne ,~ v-^en+ h ,.enlw .wM.n ~eM - • vM.w M ..w.1vv, iL en .4 ..wlv Mnw~n w.r r .ne+.... +~ .irv ,,...Mn+m n n. irvr+ -.n. y r.w Y µl.rr rw , , Y M+v.~n I< AVyLIGANf //~ // ~~ ~/ ~ p~ [~ /~ SIGN NEEE .r,°,yyyjtE~ Pi_.j~hCLApEM/~ --R~1.+n.v~a.Z-.mil-.--.~1~1./ron~-~ A~iIKATEON Rt TRANiRROR a~ IS SiA4 Oi ULIfORNIA Cwnry d_94n EdtauAW _... bb ._7/Jl/.Y7 Vv a..b< w. ..w.. r rw i~we+.lvw r w w1.wA r s n.w~w .1 ..n.l.rv . M n.. rr.n.,v .<.,v..n. +.r w -.ns..-. s~ ..n.. n.+ ~ie61 iii l.ti nnM r -.yyl` n 'im Do Noe W nrn Brleb TAw Lint; Fq DtpyElrnenl Vee (hAy Mro<hid~ ^ RwwdM nodti ~ FidveorY nOpn. r' ...._ ...................e .,".. ~ COflES MulFO xW/99-. a.Mai-........ _. _. - ean...nl <...r EnIA m /lAn nn Re<Nd Ne C' ~ B xTR4AN ~Cj.( PCreiu. Qe3s sa~si er.v Loc~-F~n: 8659 /3asacrN~ CSuNR~ZE SNO PP/NCr CEN~E2~ ~s~rY PRss£uTCy Z~ouE; Nc(crlBoRNcbp Corr£~«~c. ~ONrN~ v~MJ4cz~ I~Rc®u /WRT/{.' ~OW 2~s(v CIdL ~ `----~j i ~~ ~i ~tK: Mioiwhl~srov-Ta.~~ ~~ ` ~ .~ ra9r; OFd"ie~ ~'ESS~w.cg1 /~ `1 ~- T guy ~r~e ~z~a e ~ E ,~~., - $~ ~~ -- ._ '~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Counc it members, And City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Request to Use the City Logo on a Brochure RECOMMENDATION: The Lity Council approve the Rancho Cucamonga Ten Year Anni- versary Committee and the Friends of the Library Group in conjunction to uti- lize the City logo on an informational brochure. BACKGROUND: The Ten Year Anniversary Committee and the Friends of the L16rary Group are requesting the City to authorize their utilization of the Cf ty logo on an information brochure regarding the Nappy Tenth Birthday Rancho Cucamonga Celebration which is sc hedulen for November a, /yu/. Actac nem is a copy or a rough draft including the information that will be in the brochure. There will 6e no cost to the City for the utilization of the logo in this informational broc hurt. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, feel free to con- tact me. RAR:baa attach. ~~~ r y~~<nsa~ xTS~~^iaq ~ ~0°_3 _7 _ S~g1Z ~~g 3 03~ ~~ 4s~,p ir_ i S 3=sw~~~ it ~'s '~ 66d ~ g~ g~ g~8@m ~ ~~~F as°~~~g2~ Q~ a~~ ~~ sn?~~k~~ ~Sd i~'S~~ri~s~i god ~~s gs:i p~~ ~~~~ ~' a ~~8 ~~~~ \; ~~ ~g~~ c~9~ 3°ms =s9~}a~~38 ~R~s ~S~~vp~ ~~~ ~d's 3 ~ &~m$. '~ ~m3.s ~A m omy ~~~a '~+ ~ -Dim ~>umim Cf~ ti D m i ~ d°8 3 ~~ a g ~~~5 2a~~s~: n° e ~~=-~°s ~p~° ~msas_ g s s c 7 s ~~p F3od6°"g 3 m ° o m~ y K ~ m~~~~~~~ma~ff s~d~~~3m~~ ~~ m~~~~s~~g~~m om~~~~~~m~~~ ~~ ~~~~z~~-~ ~~E~~~~~~.~g~ 7 ~-.. Sf .. .. Q~°~' o:~~~a _~~~~~~ $~~ m~ ~"gZ°- ~° ~~ ~' Nm E~poo tio8~ °°pa~~°~38~ Sm~$a,°_oa~$ 3mo_o=oo m77 zoo 8'E g3ob p• ~s _ s~ o°-4m O m N ri m~ m_m~~°aa~= M m m= m ~ p 0 p ~oD~°m~a °-'m @ ,~ ° ° <2Z~ <~~~dgm p~O TV~pZ~ol mm~~m3o~mn ~~ p c c ~ n ~ ~ O <s~S Q 9° ~ m m `c r m_ S ~m~m~~ ~~@$@~~~s $d ~d$ a ~'~~ ~ ~ 4 m'~ m~~g ~~~$~o~ <~~ ~~~~Z 1. ~% ~¢ O 9' ~ " ~ ~ ~ m ~~ O'9m O-1 ~D~f]~m ~V+('f~m9 ~o~~ o~~ ~p ~~jc3"~Eii3m°p~ '~=~~~ 4~ipO ~~ Rm~°-°eni~~wg= m?~m °'~~ ma ?~~aNmo~mxm' ° ~5 ~ ~ dm r2' orZ pt d b~ m G a.&° ^p nm ~c - ~~2~ ~F n q~ ~' m ~ ~ 3 >; O ~°c o ~ ~ ~ p ~ m a @@m~ kic°Z ~m3 m` ~m ~~ m _~~ ~ ° ° m s p ~md ~°oE nom ~0~3 ~3~_ 0 m °~ o ~~~~~a ~o~~~~~ m~ _~ ~~~~8~ 3 ~g~m ~ ~Q~~~ R 3~~~$~ ~~~~~~ E~~~B°~ ~mdm g N ~ ~~a~ 3 m ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~$3~a~ ~~~ ag,~.~~ ~m tt~~a~$ s~~~~g~ ~~=~~ ~m~~g ~~ n m r m s ma zi <Z m~ ai :0 = Nm T a 1 r s~ ~~v ~~~ ~~~ <_~ 'p'0 m c t ~ ~a° 4 g a ; ~m~~ppppA~~ ~~.. c ~ ~~~ ~ ~' ~ o = Cfp ~~~ m 3 _ g _°~ 5 pa ~ ~.~ OA~ Gm r a ~ zy ~ ga ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ,~ ~ z~a ~ ~ r O ~ ° O ~ ~ 8 m ~~~ m m ~ d o 5~ 3$ ~ s m o Zi ~ J~ ~~ = ~~ ~ d m s ~ ~ F- cnSm< ~p~~my ~~~~~m ~o ~oop m 8as~a~ °aa~;°3 ~mcffFa' m°° s ~'~$ °m a°° ~m m °y^ya go S 0 ^ N w ~ m ~ m ° a¢ v m ~ ~c m~~m~ m ~~ ~ ~b~m o.a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOBT cx^^+oy~ ~~ v ~ 'n a 4 T of ~ z 1977 BATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Mark R. Lorf mer, Sr. Administrative Assistant ~`'~ SUBJECT: CATV Franchise Transfer Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the change of ownership and control over a City franchise agreement with Scott Cable Communications. Background The City of Rancho Cucamonga granted a 15-year table television franchise agreement to Scott Cable Communications, Inc. on April 18, 1985. The initial service area for the franchise includes all residences in the City north of 19th street. Recently, Simmons Communications, Inc. announced that it is merging with Scott i.auie i.unmuniceciuns, inc. As a consequence or cue merger, Simmons ~aoie nos requested that the City change ownership and control over the franchise from the present stockholders of Scott Cable Communications to the new controlling entities under Scott Cable Communications, Inc. [n order to properly evaluate Simmons Ca b1e's capability to operate a system in Rancho Cucamonga, the City Council contracted with Telecommunications Management Corporation (TMC) and requested an evaluation of Simmons Cable. The attached report from TMC indicates the financial and technical capacities apparent Lo Simmons Cable. Although the system will remain under the name of Scott Cable CommunicatSons, inc. the entities which are to control the Rancho Cucamonga system will include the following: ., coven Siaons, Simmons Ca b1e Communications 3CE ownership 100E voting control Allstate Insurance Company 23.33E ownership no voting control Media Communications/TA Associates 46.67E ownership no voting control ai CATV Franchise Transfer August 19, 1987 In the attached report, Carl Pil nick of TMC concludes that the proposed voting and non-voting stockholders under the name of Scott Cable Communications, Inc. are financially capable of merging with Scott Ca b1e and acquiring control and operating the Rancho Cucamonga system, although a high debt-to-equity ratio makes it likely that there will be strong future pressure to reduce operating costs and increase revenues for the company. In addition, TMC indicates that Simmons appears to 6e doing a good job operating its current cable systems (Long Beach, California especially notable) and therefore has the technical capahility to operate the Rancho Cucamonga system. Items of Concern TMC refers to two items pertaining to the change of ownership and control over the franchise which warrant consideration -- 1) the exact designation of the transferee and 2) a request made 6y Simmons to delete or modify Section 7.080.010 of the City's cable television ordinance (please refer to page 5 of the TMC report). In re ponse to Lhe Si moons transferee designation being too general and allowing for inappropriate future transfers among Lhe limited partnerships or other entities associated with those partnerships, staff was successful in modifying the designation to refer to the specific entities involved in the operation of the Rant ho Cucamonga system and the indication of the percentage ownership and voting control over the partnership. The concern identified in the TMC report has been addressed and resolved. 'n itii ,eope~C Cu Siuunmu' reyues~ vu modify cne ~,r.y~s ba oie ura finance, ~rnmons' representatives have consented to defer the issue to a future date when they may approach the City Council se pe ra to from the change of ownership request. It is anticipated that Simmons will come back to the City with this request sometime within the next 12 months. Therefore, this issue should not be of concern at this time. On a final note, TMC also recommends in its report that Simmons Cable be invited to comment on the possible impact that the cable system's high debt-to-equity ratio may have upon future revenues and operating costs. It would be apPro prite to have Simmons respond to this request after the change of ownership and control is completed. The attached resolution allows the City Council to approve the rh ange of ownership and control over the franchise with Scott Communications, Inc. to `hC Sf "^" "" '^" `- -' dbJVe which viii wnt rui tiie vuti ng and non-vo it ng stock and a r~rheyname ofLScott Cable Communications, Inc. effective at the close of escrow (anticipated for the first week of September). Sho u'id you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at your canven ienc e. a~ 1UNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CORP. 5757 Wilshire Boulevard Suile 359 Los Angeles, Calibrnia 90036 (213) 931 Q600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRANSFER OF SCOTT CAHLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE TO SIMMONS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. August 7, 1987 a3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pa e I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. QUALIFICATIONS OF SYSTEM PURCHASER 2 III. OTHER ITEMS. 5 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS. 7 APPENDIX: ENCLOSURE 1 - - TRADE PRESS REPORTS OF PURCHASE ENCLOSURE 2 - - BACKGROUND INFORMATION SIMMONS COMMUNICATIONS ENCLOSURE 3 - - BACKGROUND INFORMATION SIMMONS' PARTNERS ENCLOSURE 4 - - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ° SCOTT CABLE COMMDNICATIONS, INC. ° SIMMONS COMMUNICATIONS OF DELAWARE- MARYLAND, NEW YORK AND VERMONT ° SIMMONS COMMUNICATIONS OF LONG BEACH, INC. ENCLOSURE i - - SAMPLt: FRANCHISE RESOLUTION SUBMITTED BY SIMMONS _~nva i_pyi_~pp, ti - - u~. ~~~m?m vyi,Lp S'R4NSP_P A. GFt SiiLiiTTilN O - 1 - I. INTRODDCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga granted a 15-year cable television franchise to Scott Cable Communications, Inc., effective April 18, 1985. The initial service area for the franchise includes all residences in the City north of 19th Street. Recently, Simmons Communications, Inc. (Simmons) announced that it was purchasing all of the assets of Scott Cable Communica- tions, including the Rancho Cucamonga cable system (see Enclosure 1 of Appendix). As a consequence of the purchase, Simmons has requested that the City transfer the franchise from Scott to Simmons. This report reviews the transfer request. ~~ _ 2 _ II. QUALIFICATIONS OF SYSTEM PURCHASER As indicated in Enclosure 2 of the Appendix, the entity that is requesting transfer of the cable franchise has the following ownership: ° Steven J. Simmons 308 ownership Stamford, Connecticut (1008 of voting interest) ° Allstate Insurance Company 23.338 ownership Venture Capital Division Northbrook, Illinois ° Media Communications 46.678 ownership Limited Partnership (General Partner - TA Associates) Boston, Massachusetts Steven J. Simmons is the controlling owner of Simmons Communications, Inc., which presently has two operating entities, a corporation, Simmons Communications of Long Beach, Inc., and a limited partnership, Simmons Communications Company, L.P. The former operates the cable system in Long Beach, California, while the latter operates cable systems in 5 eastern states, Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, Maryland and Delaware (refer to Enclosure 2 for further details). For the acquisition of the Scott properties, Which carry an announced purchase cost of 5186,000,000, two major investors, in addition to Simmons are involved. Allstate Venture Capital is a division of Allstate Insurance Company, which itself is a subsidiary of St'.d rs, Roebuck. Media Communications is a partner- ship organized by TA Associates, a major venture capital firm which currently manages over $SOO,000,OOC in investment funds (see Enclosure .3). According to press reports, TA Associates has committed to raise beCween 520,000,000 and $25,000,000 in equity capital for the Scott purchase. With two associate investors whose access to invest^ent capital is very substantial, and the ability to commit $'i f.6 ,000,000 to the Scott acquisition, there is no doubt that Simmons has the initial capital resources to operate the Rancho Cucamonga sy•..em, It is useful, hnwevPr, to cnnsrder fhe question of ongoing Lun: that mdy Ue nee tled 1^ the fUCUYe, and Wnether $lmmen5 mdy he financially le ve rayed to tl:e extent that cash `low or:d orc~r^.~.biiity are marginal. In examin iuq Che financral data submitted by Sinu~~nc (Enclosure 4j, the following items are noted: The pre, forma balan cc sheet for the Scott properties, as of an assumed merger date of 3/31/87, indicates S4,SOU,000 in equity and a~ - 3 - about $4,900,000 iii cash and accounts receivable. Against these assets is a debt structure totaling over $190,000,000. Although much of this debt is long-term, the debt-to-equity ratio is very high. This indicates possible pressure in the future to either sell some properties or to keep operating costs at a minimum, or both. ° Tice operating statements for the i eastern cable systems indicate net losses for 1969, 1985 and 1966, with the loss being reduced each year. The cash flow, however, which is the net plus depreciation and amortization charges, was positive in both 1965 and 1986. This indicates that the systems are currently cash generators, although still unprofitable. ° The debt-to-equity ratio for the 5 eastern systems also is very high, with over $26,000,000 of notes payable at the end of 1986, and less than $500,000 in partners' capital. These systems, therefore, are highly leveraged too. ° The balance sheet for the Long Beach system indicates, as of the end of 1986, over $45,000,000 in notes and loans payable, with a negative equity of more than $4,000,000. This system also is extremely highly Leveraged. ° As in the case of the eastern systems, the Long Beach system was unprofitable for 1986, showing a net loss of over $6,000,000. After subtracting depreciation and amort.i zation, the cash flow was a negative $1,500,000. This means that the Long Beach system currently requires an infusion of external cash to keep operating. All of the above indicates that the rapid expansion of Simmons Communications, as in the case of many other operators who expand primarily by acquisition, has been accompanied by heavy debt service requirements and initial map ro Ei Cab L. operations. MCet opera ter5 ..: th15 pos±*_ion look *o rwar~ __ "Turn-arni.m d" in the operating results of the acquired systems, rncludinn subscriber growth, possible rate increases and cost reductions. None of these conditions provide any basrs for assuming that S irtunons will be unable to operate the Rancho Cucamom ~ system sa ti,sfacto rily. They do indicate, however, that the system may be under some cost and revenue pressure in the future. a7 - 4 - With regard to the technical capability to operate the Rancho Cucamonga cable system, TMC contacted the Long Beach City representative (MS. Sherry Blum) responsible for cable franchise administration to ascertain how the Simmons system is regarded by the city. Ms. Hlum indicated that the system is being managed very satisfactorily, and that customer service has improved greatly and subscriber complaints have dropped, in comparison with the previous ownership. Ms. Blum also indicated that prior to Simmons' acquisition of the Long Beach system in October 1985, she inspected their eastern operations and was satisfied that these were well operated. The conclusions as to Simmons' capability are as follows, therefore: ° Simmons obviously has the financial capability to acquire and operate the Rancho Cucamonga cable system. Its extremely high debt-to-equity ratio, however, makes it likely that there will be strong future pressure to reduce costs and increase revenues. Sirymons appears to be doing a good job in operating its current cable systems, and therefore has the technical capability to operate the Rancho Cucamonga system as well. ag - 5 - III. OTHER ITEMS Two items are relevant to the transfer, the exact designation of the transferee, and a request made by Simmons to delete or modify Section 7.08.010 of the City's cable television regulatory ordinance (Title 7). Simmons has submitted a sample transfer resolution for the City's consideration (Enclosure 5). In this sample, the trans- feree is designated as: "(i) one or more entities controlled by Steven J. Simmons, (ii) Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance cooperation (or one or more entities controlled by it or under common control with it) and/or (iii) Media Communications Partners Limited Partner- ship, a Delaware Limited Partnership (or one or more entities controlled by it or under common control with it)." This designation appears to grant extraordinary flexibility to the owners to transfer the franchise among themselves, or to other entities, such as limited partnerships that they might form in the future. For this reason, it is believed that the City Attorney should be requested to advise the City of the extent of this flexibility, ar~d whether a more specific identification of the transferee would be appropriate. Secondly, Simmons has verbally requested the City to delete or modify Section 7.08.010 of Title 7, which gives the City the right to purchase the cable system. Simmons objects to the sentence which states: "if such purchase or taking over be upon revocation of the franchise or at the expira- tion of the term of the franchise such valuation shall not include any sum for the value of the franchise or grant under which such plant and property is being operate d." Since the enactment of Title 7, the federal Cable Communica- tions Policy Act of 1984 has become law. One section states Char whenever a iocai government acquires a cable system, the acyulsitron must be at fair market value. This provision very likely preempts the above sentence in Section 7.08.010. The Simmons representatives are aware of the Cabe Act provision. They indicate, however, that if the Cable Act is modified in the future and this provision is deleted, they would be concerned with the City's purchase rights under Section 7.08.01.0. ~-9 - 6 - Thus, Simmons is requesting the City to give up a right which is presently preempted, but which becomes operative in the future in the unlikely event the Cable Act is modified to favor the cities. This request appears unwarranted. Furthermore, since Section 7.08.010 is part of the City's regulatory ordinance, not the Scott franchise agreement, any change would affect the City's other cable franchises as well. For these reasons, it does not appear to be in the City's interest to modify Section 7.08.010 at this time. 3a - 7 - ZV. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the previous evaluations the following recommendations are made: ° It is recommended that the City approve the transfer request. A sample transfer resolution is provided in Enclosure 6. ° It is recommended that the City Attorney review the designation of the transferee, to assure that the City will have adequate control over possible internal franchise transfers in the future. ° It is recommended that Simmons Communications be invited to comment on the possible impact that the cable system's high debt-to-equity ratio may have upon cable system revenues and costs. ° It,is recommended that the City take no action at this time to modify Section 7.06.010 of Title 7. nrrsNCix 3a ERCrosuRE i TRA-E PR.SS REPORTS OF PURCHASE 33 MultKhannel tlew5 _ lurx ~, 1~7 Simmons, Cooke Set the Pace Cable Industry Greets the Summer With Some Scorching System Sales Purdwse of Scott Doubles Simmons' Size I BY 4rry JaRee STAMFORD, CT-Simmons Communications Inc almost rkwbled in aiu teat week after aoyukireg Scott Cable Communi- ationa Ins, which opentea 26 able systems wuh 106,000 sub avibraa, fortl8.imillion, includ- ing liabilities, IAho in the buyers' autumn last wale was Continental GbIN vision Inc. which increaacd its stake in Adams-Russell (.n. Inr, by purchasing the shares held 6y Tekable Corp. See story. page 9L.1 The acquisition makes 4yrar- oldSimmons, now with s tool of 217,Oglsubacribers, the natiml's 40th-largest muhiple systems openbr. Previously it was thr 61 at-largrsl MSO. with 19 ss. 4ms and I II,IXX) suhxribrrs Among the Stull syalrms pur '~ chased by Simmons em: Fnn I Angelo. TX, 27,gq subs; ttlnr mnnectrd syeVnu in Hnosmn. IU,00(1 .rur: end Ihrrc ~rtlirr Tessa eyamma for x nvn hlnivl 8.000 subs: ~71n /ilm~. t L`Tu s i euba• Meyrra/~'•1-i1R CiL.~C:\ YYl e::b:: ~ mngnnin. Niel, IO,IXq aubx, xnd lircih ~nl \~\ fl,(Xq sobs. ';11'rtn of Ilu~ >,+nl pwpw li. are similar m ibxrarlr•n.l u• L, our rlemii rxbL• na eb~nn m Ihr E:anem laln nl Ihr I hnlrrl luu,. said Strv~ inn nx ~u•, ~inunrni. pmddrnl .cod ~ Im•f ~~s,., I nr~.,l ~ fimr. Hr added theta number of the aysremsarehighgtoevtL ro , audrorityapproval The prrajened b i p p ertiea that will npidly add sub- I c e ng datehSept. I. Mr. Roseman said $i xdben. • , mmoro is not sun hmv b ..:u ....._ . ~y{ w 8ohen Ituaeman, Simmnm vim president o! 'r """- dd m e f mar- keting and vales, the pumha e e d that the comp ny4 stillHn " ' x primwesbL65Uil,7W lxralso • grasth made and is looking x'ribrc Aa pan of th<deel, $im- ~' l b acquire a couple o! other MSOe. "R/e'u xrious eb m~~sa n willeswmef69mO8on In drbr. ow acquisitions. Stew ISimmonal ' Amn Cable, which ma folmd- '' l f gebonhudaktlrreeorfowlpm- Poealel a week;' he add d n n Jhn Soon in the earl 197 Y Os, re id its sherehnlden would re- e . Simmone hea doubled in eiu eser rcrwF2:.2$eshaminceahunder h )yeernnceits inception, ar- mrdinq to Mr Ruu I r s gr+ament' . man. Thr ' wnlirr Janemvsk i, Sm4 vice company s last tswa acquisitions were the 38,gp-sub prcsnlrm nl stntrgio planning, ~xiJ 51on'e hoard nl di Inng Beech, CA, in Nnsember mrlnn mxdrlhrdrciiionmxll th<mm- 19A.i and 6,OPJalrb Tried, MD, e onus "'+i'riroirhsl ]Immune has ve tam in Mareh l9Ai. door .. tier job bnildinq thev ~nni d h Meanwhile Moody'a lnwemr Service lent week wid it h p:un, xn t ink dwy ran coo- II'I~~" ~~~ ~am~ nn whet u the single-62 ntin of Pm g Smq'e preum nlx~,ac~~nv~nr hxe donr:'hr mid auboldineted de6enuure undrr , .u lAun' Ibm 1ro11 mnnegrnlenl .. dl n.x +Inv nn with 5i ' uview for poxible .1 svngmdr. Moody'e said the review svaetri mmonn. Ilr lsnnlrvl out that the arqui- •Il q. gemd $coll'e pmpoeed acquiai- hY Simmon f um i. .u sab)rv1 In legmaitr e. ., T S(mmons takes big leap 3immona Coaemumatldoa will dwble in .;". m e result d ib remnHy amounted iRiB-milliao acquieitiw of 9aott Gble Commmintiow. The mmpenY u R YinR Swtt i2Z26 • dun and assuming iG8 mlllio I in debt. 7'he deal wu wrwnoed dme lb after • bideiog wnteat managed by PaineWebber. 900![ setvn apPmrimately 106,800 beck grbmben in 28 able syetema, which trarulalp mW • prig pet abamberdi1.75!• Aaordiug to Steve Simmopa, president and CEO d 9immow Gmmuniatiws, rho company wu attnctd W 9mtt baauea the prapertiea e0mpdsed primarily dsosie ubb aYatems, wiW which 9immoru hu eate0aiw erpwt- ana. "We've had very good rsWq maoagiog wr Eadan nbk properties," he noted, RCetrieg to the 82.000 auMci- 6an held in 9immoor Copuauniutiwa G. LP, . limitd paRaetehiP• is addithn4 20 perpnt d8aote'a aubaeribm an ie hyh gnwLh aurae end mon than %perant dtha plaoL it soon than 98 cbuoneb. Broken have dmra0terired the 9mtt properties u "small; "spreedaut" aM "dimwit to manage." Hoverer, aamrtling m Bob Rueemen, vim preddenL mu'kotirrg vim far Bim• mono, Ne o0mpury'a west p~tabla ayatwr u • .mall property one and • hdfheun p~~hdBuRalo. "Our rogiwal manager vidte tbw property only • fen tlmes • yaay" be nnfwl "all v. ..J :" ~W,~„H"..wuiiwiiY~ The Scott acquLiGion will mdse Bimmom Conrmuuim~ bone th< <Oth largest cable opentor. The new pmgrties will be put into a eepera4 aubeidiery fnm the mm(wnyY limited parmerehiP and iV mrperata mhddiary 9immom Communicatiana of Long Beach, which hold. that able property. TA Assodetes will provide betwaan iZ0 million end f25 million in equity for the deal. Cw81f.VIAIUNUOLY l ,b1 ~5 ENCIQSURE 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION SIMMONS COMMUNICATIONS 3~ Officers sad Directors Steveq J. 6lamms - Presidmt and DSnetor Slamons Caamonicatims 203-359-0455 1600 Bummer Street Stamford, Comecticut 06905 Bnrry A. Fromberg - Yitt President o7 FSmnce and Secntnry Sums Commmicatims Robert E. Aussmaa - Yitt President of Marketing SSaons Coa®anicatlms Martin Walker - Yitt President of 8ngiaeering 6lmmoas Communicatlme Aoger D. Norboys -Vice Presidmt of Operations Simmons Commm3cetlms dMo of the above officers in additlm to Steve Simmons will be Directors of the Campegy. Bevenl outside Dlnctore will be nerved Sn Lhe future, their names will be provided apm their appointment. Ovnershlp Steven J. Simmons - 30f of Company, 100$ of the voting interest Allstate Insurance Campeny - 23.33f Allstate P]nza Northbrook, Illinois 60062 Media Communications - 46.67E 111 Devonshire Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 37 ABLE SYSTEMS Simmons Commamicationa Comparry, L.P. VermontMew Hampshire REGIONAL OFFICE: ST. JOHNSBURY, VERMONT Sf. Iakurdwy GrwD ruoing. CarmN, Lyndon Center, LyMon Corner, Lyrdarvilk, t5vumpeic and ` St. lahmbury, VT UDD++ HdYq GrvDaa+iq: Bath, NarerhiB, North Naverhiq Woodsvilk, NH; oho Newbury. Wells River. VT Barn GwDsaroing.• City of Barra, 7bwn o(Barre, WilEamamxm, r[bwn d Berlin New York REGIONAL OFFICE:OWEGO, NEW YORK CAitfew:.go Growpawvirrg.•'Ihwn dSullivan, Ylkge o(Chi[temngo enenxru l.muD mwne VrIL'Ige Ot tllenvtlle, loml of Ellenvilk, lbwn o(Fallshurg,'Ibwn of Mamakating, lhwn a/ Nahrster, 7bwn of Wawarsing, Village of Woodridge Gurgo Group sming: 7bwn of Gndor, Village and Town of Owegq lbwn o(Tioga F,~n Ya74v GmwD seruinq.• Town and Village of Lisle, 7bwn and Village of Mamlhon, Village of Whitney Poinl .Salamarva fmuD muing: 7bwn of Great Valley, Town and V,IIaRe n( Lntle Valley 7bwn and City n( Salamanm Wal(nn Group snoinR: '[bwn and Village rat WaIMn DelawareJMaryland Grn6.r'dge Cm.D moue: Cambridge, areas ~ Drscnter County, MD CAerurtown GmaO reroine: Chntmmwn, areas of Kent Cowry, MD laww/kkumr CrwDavoia6 ClarbeNe, Dagehorq Fmnldad, MBbbotq MBIviBq Ooeo Yrew Omar, Sel6yviBe, and Soudr Bethany DE; also BbhgniBe, MD Midrhoee Gawpmoirrg; Bwren Beuh, Brklgewlk, EBendak, Farmingtoq Felton, Wederiq Greenwood, Harrington, Housbrt Magnolia, Mrltaq Vrda, DE; ahro Dentoq Federalsburg, Grtembmq HurlorY, Presfmt, and Ridgely MD Sl. Maryi Coarrfj CrwDsrroiwe; I.eanaNtown, St. Mary'e Cowry, MD Sea Colony Group roving: Bethany Beach. DE SoulFern Maryland Group serving.•Pittaville, Willards, Wlukyavillq Oeran Pirwa, areas of Wormt<r County aM Wioomim Cowry, MD UDDwEarkrn SFort Group +arving: Centrevilk, Gmsanville, Kem Is6rd, pueemtown, Rock Hall, Steansville, St. Michaels; auras of Kent Cowry, 7-IDot County, and Queene AnMh Cowry MD Wertmr SAm Group serving: Chosapealra Beach. North Beach, 7lacyi finding, MD Simmons Communications of I.onR [leach, Inc. ,nnl.~lmrtrh GmuD serwne.~ Long Bearh. S,Nnal Ilill, areas nl Ien AnRrlet County. CA 3 I+N d Nw1 ~a re, Maa'im NammN N Arx~ xaaaaealr bN awar b raY 1+InYw b'a16~ aNl rawm ws b +ery N+r Axalab hw ~ ~abaraA xm aloe Y aa+N Aaaadn xlMaa+! dr car rmY arreN~YlrWa. tNY r~ kaaa+ar. h eala+l+lm N rLln r e+wt Aaaea Y a W as b NamM l~ w Nm.. M wrlrP wrtl+~tNWa. dMNlesawW mhtrNNltld Inerre. x w Nmw xrpm r aParb eamatWaK balx Ys+earb ae~M1 M aan h a+w bemba4 ru.,.a h +aara anw e. awa Fr w 1~ r5 ekarwa s W a ~k-~ISlear b xr Aal tl~s b ~dl, a+tl +san M+W My N ss+swll N Awrb b r Nall ag r oar A+hawm wx.rrN+a xNba r.rw., tw aleem INnxa ar.u+r b. the h re n amwN N B.rlb r r a~weN r eNr lMwhla lsnly. x MrMgalafalla I+IaNN+a. ym Neb drY{~N w awlY~wlrl wiaMwMy. 1M aaarp em Y •w r w anMha N w tabsi ara rlNt r w aarq tex., w lr war.IPb. ~w YrNeN-Ne~daaNa MiNNIiNaY wklh rrarwtam, a+mAr W ArN ml.kxa ANa+lYsa Y leN+ Ni w d+~l N'brr AarNarR• w INee NxM wrm+eaMw r aNa AlIIl1Y ularrbM aa« rNN e~arbV a aNw YbaMaa rb. saK ab IWm rYwrllYrNaeW rwYNiw. $rKIn1Y Cnm11XYXC+nnY n! NLMiI Oae ICINr am amwtl. hudglramertd m SlvdaN. Cwmer~ tine. The mmpvry was blmdN r 682 M Stmen 7 The mommy agvu0y dewXN n i uRwmn w purClmsK and aperabl¢ sable rv spRms m the eamem hau d the United Smtes A camber d mtely w:rt uxd'm the purcN.ae xinuan ma[ess. nKlud W U+e rOmmV: DolemW rr mcrtuulg WsK. Pm and tier wbacriber laer+ehalians; colldnwn d the cable prm and eRUWmN: nDWrtWd1Y w reduce eawnxs. pawmiY br gIUMh wxlN all surtwmdrg VK ryNem: We oral ccwwnry: kuKhue rtRlluments, and We wbxrcy d OouprB rysRms Imo cau nl mxnxemeM+rN ¢wwlmcs d arak. In Mry. 683, the wmpaly Pu%hased n i f I pwp d aptems m mrtheutem Vermom ark New NampaAbe. Trs moo r8aned Ruekty m lone and 1WI d 683 wiN purcluwa r New York. Dehwue. ark MaryWa TY,m sYatmu weR added durmp Ihr oral elgM mmlNS, bmgvlg Ilse wW number of fubermben w mer aB.opo M the ell d 13M The ronlpam~ uMerwenl • sgmtnmt ch+lme In fMnenJVr M IVX!+ %eplnmg IM:iXIM ulnvnlrr raEle Mum m lory Beuh all SxXW Ndl. Cadomu fran the Tmxa MhwrlKny{M RNder Cwnpames Thu was Symms finl semuR cola a Prmmdy urban mwllA Lld Ma RRYded q' w11K NdYSIfY Ln)'Fla as a wnKwlul mkY mwNrllenl 1911p BeuA, hm ewe, had cooly d the poslhse rhalamenslrs Ihm Symms had kwked for m the puRNU nl nx nslrm pmperl+ea Thert was ayndKanl nnfnrturvly w In CR+M fYL%nb3'r P[MInWn Lk In Rdwe IMdI ill openus. The ohk Phm a so8d and Imq Bexh Wa3 N KOrg1111tlIIY mbfLi NIm111nnIY. Srmms dwell r s nn marugemelX 4m, hm aH a wry mmerienced dfiR and Idtld at+8. Cunomer unxe and 6eM opcra4om weR uperNN, new markerle and idea Pnyama were hne6lrN, tachniral maidenxKe .u mpowd, aaN w aabm abnN w pmdme wry pmxiw>rrvka. By We end d 688, w 38,000 mlbraaw eystevl had coin E per cCM w (!$Od Wbac(Rltf. $LYYbY plpaLma Ipd been drurlaar>th' Rduccd alN aN Box hW nvve thm doubled. N d Apr81%!. SiRrlom pmpertica aerwd user lIOA00 subambna who plliLhaaed apprmlulep. NA3,000 Pay udb. The rolapxy camiuea b emm fhrm~ %gwWls. egMlell[IIOn.4tl mV kClulg. MMetrawen! SIbNeWe~ Smmma [anma scam prtudly corns all aperNea ih uhk aynenu Iraleh no ellllllea. Fw the file onem srtes. Nwe is a rdted Wnrcnhp need Slnulwa Conumvxaxans Conwvq. L.P. Sim• mwu Cade Comnlwcatims, Inc., w openblgemnr, u tlx teneN parwen The Inng Be%h compwy rs owned w a rorpomlmn. Smunans Commul%almx nl lury B<%h. Inc. Eguny bxkmg (or Somm~s' opentwns has been convlbuted by T.A. Nsocutes. the hlptsl wmurc raMW compam' m the L ~., U,5. 1MIUrt Fwlers dlXl.•Oslale nsalvKe Tht tV11h51h+1 hale P%' tKTyNed m acmumuons art Ixe BanAoJ NrX~ RnRbM. Ammtwl, ilYe Rawl Rang aJ falwm, all ConnamrW Nanowl Ran4 Mxrkxt/nom ApPxoawA Tne kty to alnmmp dK pmletted tales nbxmnes umrlws a mWmdlmenswsW mmkewg appmxh UrprMm nn drmngraphKS vb the plmimly d <nn~ sumrrs t~ ary mmm~. Sammons uxs obk slort5 !o rxl rusmmen m "bm ewms:' dvett mW w m..,..,. n.Py. LhmLnerNB. +RwS W Cfr moll ndNl^Yk +ggRSalx pYbIK RIi11nn5 Mnsl unqutandpt Slmmnns uxs door w dn+r sales In msn euh and even home m a trwKhne arts to ~w~rlrnn.h~ ..wA lm sAe mde.° Toe nbperwe d mr saMs Inrtr Is Iwn~IMd -to sodll oNers hom N mn~ subunbe- all aNwy uPlPadr all esuun8 suma+brl., m new levels nl xnxe Trs n a veq' +Rxrtawve pmgnm, all Ilav rtsulled m subunber wml+h am) raaA ha mrrcasrs a.ar 39 Steven J. Simmons is President and Chief Executive Officer of Simmons Communicntiona, Inc. Sl1?VF.N t S~OtOIV3 ya Stew Svmnons b a gtaMute d Candl Unitenily p968) and Hatvatd law Sclwd p912). For five)ean after law school, he was a ptokssor at the University d Caerorttia, where he taught mmtnmications and Fust Amend.nem law as wells other topics, and wmle a nimtber d articles about btoadasting and able fekvdsbn polity which appeared in such places a the Colun6ia law Reuievs. Ha book. emitted T7u Fairness Dadrinc and the Media, p widely ckM. From ]97J m 198(1 he served as Asmtatd and then Avaodne Dicec- for dthe Domestic 1'tvfx7 SIaH at the White House, whtxe Iris teapomf60ities vrluded fdeoomrtpwotiwta policy. hnpwb~ govettutetd nunagenlerx, acd other molten. Simtmns represented the N9dk HavuK at mmy tekmrmnmiatiom car/ererrces and de8vered a nmrher d prevemationa on able teleyisiorr. Ne ad- dresaed the Natiaul Gbk'Rkvisbn Aasodation an seveal arasimia. N 1980, Stele joined Douglas Comrtmrucafiwu Cor- poration as Senior Yrce IReaidem and helped that cars- parry glow from 30,000 to over 100,000 wtrembvs .y,~u ,u uc,ac. w :is :iiwu,c wu4++~U'. lip responsrbditks angel from Gatrchising to general marugement. He founded and 6erane President and CEO of Simrmns Communiations m mid 1982. Over a fifteen year perbd, Steve has been urvolved in able kkvisbn tmm the academic, the regulatory, and the operational peapeciive, 71 C, a leading able indus- trymagazine, staled about him, "His rtunagemenl, legal, poetical, and analytical ski0s combined with wide kmiwledgc of cable TV and communications and sheer dekrmination. are a rarely found combination. Sunnwns is a continuing able television success story." Simmcns' ~1ong beach gamble paying off ~.~.,,. gyp J .a.rn. nay. r. ~ r ~. t ~ Ne. _. .. it .. . ,° s 1 9 ~... p with Senior Vice President 76m Mc- Crory, hurdled the treneaction, noted that Long Beech held greet intereeL for other operefore in southern Califomie intent on expanding their operations there and that for mmpeniee each ae Simamro outside the market, it pro vided "e good building block" for other eouNem California properLiee. "Long Beech itself was chengivg," wted Rich Churehill, a partner et TA Assocu4a, which helped Simmons buy the system. "It brad slid dawn in the 1970e, but it had • maple billion dollus in new mmtruction mmmifinenG" et the time Simmons end oLhere wen Inking at iL, he said. Moreaveq while the system was poorly penetrated et 27 percent, it peexd 145,000 homes. That potenLini for imprmement wee one of Lang Beach's moat importevt ettreQione, "We went through a 30-item check- list of fectore in deciding whether or not fv purchase the system," said Simmons in a rceen! interview. "IL came dam to three crucial faemre- basic penetration was extaemely low, operating resrgine were very low (14 perrevtl, and I,osrg Beech.m a mm- mwity wee gnwaing and dy'rtemic. The bottom line for ue was Chet we (alt rte mold dramatically increase cash Bowe . war five yeere.•' Simmana convinced venture mpital lino TA Associates m go in on the deal with him, end, despite the high level urvugin bra mutton m equity to the deal. Simmons borrowed the remaining two-thirds of the cost of the acquisition Crom a consortium of banks that included the Bank of New England, Ameritrust and the Royal Bank of Canada. Simmons ended a paying top price for Lonq Bench rand committing to a EB million rebuild of the one-thud of the system that had been built by '(Imes Mirror, thn onglnal franchise holder, more than ]0 )curs before The 'I remaining two-thirds of the plant had boon hunt m the ~•arly IOCOs whrn lhn frnnchse was hold )omth~ Lp 'l'anes M;rrnr and Kmpht~Rlddrr The rebuild was naomph shod in the time belvn•en I ihn s:n ::.n cra...n _. ~ nk,acnlcnt n..d 4w Novrmbcr l4riG"rlosln¢ date i far [he transaction As nor industry, i source noted, the sellers werr "morn than Plcaseri" wttb the grace. Even !re(orn tnkmg full control a(the ~ xy N4~m, now rnll~~d Amm~nns (:nb!e TP ~~f Long Bench, the company knew that Its first order n(busmene was to put in plvcc nn rxpcnmced, tnp.BtRht men ngamrnt temp In thr ycnr that the ~YStrm r ± 4~'en ne '1 „ ..;Irkrt vtalT I George rerpuson, Vk:e Resklerr} - Sole "Because we build, rebuild, and upgrade caore syssems, we nave pienry of everytnlnp you nand - In stock. Being a lull seMCe conshuctlon hrm glues us the technical expertise to help you evaluate oqulpmenL "Call me about any of our services " Comhucfbn • Equlpmant fuppry • DraMrq EnRinraring • Ratlvlr GGibIQ S¢fVIC¢S C"AtTlprny/a1C 21If MorydaU Avaara, Wiinamaporl, M 17101 TOIIJfl1: EOO.171•f461 lira aA:) aO0.111•fLf -_ - WIYr h!'~~Ie11N11AHY IS,:M'I q •.ilab' m„~r Unr Indus ,cI uianuei :he si[v;rtmn on the Llat chat 'I1 nu•. AL rror and Knight. ILAder "dId nut hive [heir heart" m :I~.e a.trr:~ \'erther cumpnny' was in ' unJ both ,oars preaccup+ed wnh ~~I; her ca Ste cvntures-Times >L n'~n ~n nh rte dI P¢ul[ uverbulld sttu. ai tun In Ph oentx and Kntght•Rtdder w¢h IL. nuw feint vvnturo u'tth 'CCI. 'I'lls t,o amgmnles (molly deeded to pn Chao sepn rote ways m 1984. New manager h: ~cptumher l:)N:i, Simmons hared F'rmik )k Svlhs, the general manager ,u 1;,livv x`n air, nonii of Los Angeles, to run the Lung Beach system, Vallev Cable (rod also gone through the grow- ing pains of nn urban newbulld, nntl 11cScl hs had hero reyonsible far puo tmg the Inrge system back on LLe feet StcNcllls, m .urn, brought m his own handp¢ked ntnnagement team. Ae di- rectnrof ndmtmstretinn, hehired Lt nda Edwards. u`nI had more than a down years experience m ncemmting end admtmstratinn. Rny Pearson was made vice presdent for marketing end salsa, and Pat Murphy, a.k a. Dr. Alegehertz, uas named director of technical npera~ Lions. "Through their eBnrts, we have brought pro(¢ssmnnlism to the staff," smd McNelhs. 'R+gether with Bob Ruesmsn, cor porale ace prevdrnt (or mnrketng. anJ Mnrtm Walker, vine president for engmrrn rig at Simmons Cnmmum;u bons, the company instituted a easen- pnnt plan (or Imprm'In¢ cable servce to IsmK Beach nubsenbers end :ncrcaa~ mK the operating efBaenry of the system Chet( The Brst step was put bnK m place Iho new managenn~cl Caron. Than, according to Simmons, ter onmpnny' bupan a campmgn to popes[ e new image Under the rubnc "l4'¢'re ''~, changing more Cher. the name;' Sam- mons Cable TV launched n major newspaper edverliaing campaign end a direct mail effort, bought placards on city buses, initiated a program to I present speeches to key community I groups and, "Really end most tmpor tent," according to Steve Simmons, ii "we elrengthened our ties xo[h local politicises." satd Sunmons. Sales clTorts were redi- ne[ed from multiple pay packages of three or lour services to dual end ningle pay packages. Salen efalf wan added both for door-to-door eRorte, which went from three people to 20, and telemarketing elforta, which added eight people to itn previous staff of 12. Fbr the Rrot time, marketing materiels were pooled in Spanish end edvertie- ing use placed in the city's leading .4sien pnpera, which serve Long Beach's The company changed its progrnm~ ~ large Cambodian population. mmg lineup by adding new services In what both McNellie and Simmons end m some eases dropping the paces see es particularly crucial, Simmons a(its programming packages. Accord '.i Cable TV wns able to reach an agree- f mgto AlcNelhs, whde pay services hod I meet with the local newspaper. Knight- ~~, been discounted to n certain extent Rtdder's Preaa Telegram, to craete e under the former owners, there hod i TV guide that includes both raMe and been little "rhyme or reason" to [hr broadcast listings. "That uas Bob program olfenngs on the system. "Su h~ Baseman's coup,' said McNellis. "It stnh¢rs did not know what they were i " works for us and for the Press. 1 got rid huy+ng, he smd of a xery tough met renter end it helps I sell more newspapere "Simmons pays $15 far 3 pays 'i~ the newspaper far helping publish the ~, guide, but the cable company gets beck Slmmona Coble now oRero subscri~ the value of that check in display bars a bash package x'ith twu pay's. ndsertising. The agreement was na[ i plus an additional mini-pay, far E29,95 pert o(the acquisition. r per month Bosic enble costs E34,95, Sammons also reargnnired its tus- t which means Chet the three pays ore Comer service operations ea they would ~ made available for just ElE. The moat run more elfiaently 6y croeedraining popular pay mmbinetions on the system ell its representatives to handle bill- are ShowttmeThe Disney Channel and ~ ing, repair or salsa questions. A new Shox4tme/fhe Movie Channel, said Cable Data billing system wns also put A1cNellis. Pny services ore made avail- in place. Aggressive quality rnntrol able nn n stnnd~nlnne bast., but that ~ and preventive meirt¢narce programs olfenng. which HBU dominates, costs ! were munched in its techniml rervicea EI1 per month. Added to the basin i division, end 18 new installere wore programming pncknge, which has re~ ', hued in en eRort to reduce the amount nwinod rm+cinnl i n hmn Mme,. ,.r ...,.L rAn. . .. ., d...._... -.,..+ __ tbC DIFfTY`ry ('elflnnClr I'rlm!' TiCkrt, °Thnt N95 the fMU9 Of a ¢I~ Of Homy?hopping ('hnr.nel and R\"h:,4 <umpini nts;'noted Smmons 'R', a LKaI fL,pannt etnm~n hospi to the eddttion of Steffen the ~fhr f.ll rt:'1 n1:tl~" Inltl alt\'1' N'il, IV In[In life ICVCI and tIt Iho YnICa depflrt~ ol•,angr tm~ r.~.nrk l„~,,: nn I -nlar rffurt. n.,~nt, tL•e company reduced stag mor- nil (rem 150 ful4h me employees to Il0 u>,Lry. thereby mareus+ng Productivity .\h~enleeism has been reduced (mm JO percent nn anv one dnv m Ines then C t„sent, according w McNellis, "In mu~ n( my early 4d ke to our people, 1 ,,.Operating o d Cncm I felt it xoe my miasma to margins hQVe gone r.iake them wont to !ome into unrk m tl:e morning when their nlnrm chxk fro m 12 ercent to ' went oR," he seed. '°Phey laughed." p hot airnrly the im{rrned senx of n ~hr(^e nt ~nl_~ 1 i'r'•fCn9tonNham 9nd In CrCd H`d Lral ning cash flow has v l~tlld VII. h xxlO. 1'he rrsultst of the intense c(!nrt In t doubled, the port n(the wmpnny to impnrve rtx image trod xcrvlr¢ are i",dent In the rnmmmlts mole by lixnl poliUann~ S'i1mOn5 xnd rubvnlwrv. IgPg Iw:r ('llv lbw ihnnn Ur Tltn to Clerk ntinhmex ihr coin pn ny'x tin pnn'rr1 pi fenn:nvr v mmr rxprnnnard sbrti '"I'hev ~ ' Ipht .~ Iv.,Ildr uulh n i••I; .• Irn•', 1 ~`\I•rl'I I~r :I n'I I'YI~~"li`nl'1', IIr ~.In '~ 3 'There is a highs e higher level of who wee feetur end wuseng sne new system and its oRerv Inge, aid he is now stopped on the street 6y local residents telling him, "Nay, you're doing okay." 21 IsMeMt IneraON Thox comments hose translated into concrete geim in subeeriben and penetration rates in the 15 montAe since Simmons took over Ne system. The subscriber moot has risen from 38,9011 in Noaember 1985 to 68,200 fodsY. a 2• percent increase. While the system hen been adding homes passed as a result of a surge in economic activity and development in Long Reach, penetration rates have rixn from 27 percent to 32 percent Average revenue per aubxriber hsa mend from E26 per month to E29.69, pertly ae e function of growth, but aim bemux the company has been more suaeeeful in aping xrvices. Pay unify have grown from 59,000 to 69,000, • 17 percent increex. In 1987, the company is projecting its revenue per subscriber will rix to E31.39, without • refs increax. Adding aubxriben alone, howeser, is of little benefit if chum rein remain high. Aa is often the ease in urMn areas, Long Beech is <herecterized by e high percentage of trenaients. While basic chum has declined from 5.5 percent to ~ percent on a monthly haxla. $immnn• void IAe ..ne............aa hke [e see e 3 percent rax. 'The question always is can you get subetti~ hers and operating margins up, with- out mereasing churn, which is very rx nc real vc," noted CEA's Sweeney. \vhele the company has made headway nn this front, 4 p.rcenl is still mnsid~ ,•rrd hl:;h n.+,rall, hnwrver, the company has wkrn tm•PI stndes in Improve ng eR~ "Irmo :Ind productivity 'Thy bottom I:m~ I. that our nprraU ng margms have I:^nr linen 12 prrrrnt to 27 percent end ',nil !low hus dnuhird." ;aid Simmons. \5'h u~~ h~~ drrhnrd to dneuss cash How ~,~~~.dh', ;rt thr umr of its purchase , In. cox ilrauh system was reportedly ~~ ~~~ wu~ gi J nlllliOn In [AAn ", • n .•IAI Inn unl I,a"is Ultimately, lhr rungl.e ley brh even a can roar.h the mhrl n .!andani of 40 percent operet- i,lp'm red Ihnl Issh How wdl Iramn w~ court thnn six times over ile Irrri „! the Woe of purehese. A. i ,9bwr Slmmans ie mn- m.l, Ihl• nluneutr Ilucaaon of whe~ ~n nn; le~. inrr.tmmrt in Long ..,!I '. n,. p.ud nH comes down Hurry Wahl, Turnkey Adminhhobr "I show our custonrers the business ImpIICO6ons of Melr Oeclsbns - strort term and bnQ lean. "I con sot up O 100 mile turnkey to be Nmed on In 20 mile sections. Vour marketlrp people can Oo to work while we're still w4rln{) the rest. Vour ppybock starts sooner. "I con also help you decide which would be mIXe Coat aflectlVe: an UpQrprl9 OI O rBUUlld, "Whotever your cable need, call me, I'll help you see how It aBech the blp picture." Conslluclbn • EQUlpmanl fupply • IJIettllp FnRksaaOnp . Rwlgtr CC]bl¢ S¢NiC¢S Comf~anY/Inc tll7 MarydaN As•nw, tYBfemaporl, IA 11/01 TOIL IEfl: f06lff•faff 0n -A:) a00•f7f•fMf I'a PL1:V1110N 1'LIIRI'.1H1' IS 19n1 al SYSTEM PROFILE to two tests: can he provide an mkrnel rate of return k the equity inveskrw that will meet their ezpecktiona end can he comfortably pay down hie debt? With revenue per subscriber end cash flaws increasing, the signs are excel- lent that he will continue k meet hie mmmitmenk k the benke. Simmons admik that those inkiest charges mean the syekm will not be profitable until the end of the third year of ownership. By that time penetration rake ehauld 6e in [he mid-30 percent range, Ultimakly, penetraifon rates should be in the high 30 percent bracket or law 40 percent range end the eyetem should serve 60,000 eubecribere, said Simmor;a acrd othere close k the mm- peny. II mble eyekme ere Belling (or f1,g00 k (2,000 per subscriber in five or seven yearn, the Long Reach syekm will easily be worth more then f100 million. SSimlllfon payback Comidering the increeeea in eubecri- bera end revenues eo far, TA Aeeoci- afea is extremely confident that ik investment in Long Beach will pane financially rewarding, Nornully, ven- ture capital firma expect a return on their investment of 25 k 36 percent. If TA put E16 million ink [he deal, it ezpecte about f66 million beck when the syekm ie cold, spun oR k the public, or atherwiee restructured fimn- ciaiiY in itve m ecven years. we me compeny'e Rich Churchill put it, "We viewed [hie m one of our greatest rieke. Rut, considering likely values, we think this will be one of our beat invest- ments." Obaerrere point k two feckra ea critical k the auecem of that invest- ment. Nat only has Simmons succeeded in adding eubecrihera end moving pen- etration end operating margins up, but also he end others, such ae Steven Uodge of American Cebleeyakma, ere demonstrating that southern Cel ifornie is not necessarily a hostile environ- ment for cable kimieron Snnmone'g success in Inng Reach "rs en mtroduo kry chnpkr k the success of the whole 'them C lifom,a regmq" CEA'a Sweeney predicted. Srmmons hee suc- ceeded in really effecting the deyto- day operetione o(the syekm. It's n combination of tSe market and the system," Sweeney said. "You can't aeperek [he two. If you look et the market two yeere ego, 1 was not sure this would ^y. IL would take a lot of work. It ie clear now, though, that the nuke that were kken were well kkon and that ~trw end TA will be cr rv hippy" "No minimum order." "Whether you're O'MOrn & Pop' or nn pq C:; I'~' Occapt your order ono ship promprh '. SIOfH1Ord pOCka0e -- oo mimm~,rn ,].o-.r amount ~-- - "II you narsd cable uquipmem ~" ...,, wll me." Conafruutlon • Equlpmenl fupply DranrnR Enylasednp • Repalr Cabl¢ Services Company Inc. flq Marydale ,tvmuq Wrllramrport, Pa rl]o: TOII IRFE: FOO.71)~Iae] (In PA:) e00J]]~eeze , ~i JCB ROkOSMi ACCnJn~ I wfi:4.n fl. Service-Re le Ced Comple into end Syet em Downtime Por purpoe ee of cleri Eica[ion. routine ee twice cells or billing inquiry ere no[ treated ee complaints. Service ce lle end customer inquiry ere treated separate ly and diet us eed Lter in [hie eettion however. Comple {n[ logs are mein rained in the General Mensger~• office. Service ull loge sre maintained in [he diep etch of uce of our technical operations center end reported on a deify baeia. Nr. .Iase• C. HenkL March 31. 1987 Page 5 C. Tn [he the lve month period Boded Detembet 71r 1986 the compeay received 4l7 complaiate: TO tht NenegemenC 251 To City Staff 148 To City Couatil 16 Better Buaimen Bureau 2 Pe decal Co~uoiemt ioma Co®iss ion 0 Totd 4l7 By type and nature the 417 complaints are cLa•ified: Hil ling b Phone• l61 Picture Qua li [y 6 Converter Pai lure 7l Niued Appointmem[• 44 Converting Homes to Rebuilt System 7] Apsr [meot {Tiring i Nl1aClnaaC! 26 Cu ida• 4 Nisce llaneoos 25 Customer PAuc •[ion 21 System Ouuge• (eiming) 12 Conet ruction 11 Pnployee PerEOrmsnce 7 Property Dsuge 5 Poor Dr iv iag 1 Ae a point of reference. the following ix a list of compls iota by type and their re letionahip wfth tot •1 yearly bueineer. Billing (161) Nailed 577.564 bi lla Pier ure Quality (71) Provided approximate ly SOB~OBO hour of programming M ie Bed Appoin tment• (44). Camp leted 62,400 appointmeab Convere ion of Romee [o nebui ii CoL le System (73) . . Approz imate ly 18.000 hones converted to new cable ryst em y~ llr. ]ames C. Hank la Marsh )1, 1987 page 6 Apartment hiring (14) . ffiere are an estimated 65.000 apartment of eondominiuma wed for uhls service. Guide^ 6 Miscellaneous (25) Previous owerahip provided anachly gnide coauining mly 6DZ of the progra®ing at no charge to customers only vich premium channel services. Re changed the guide co • meekly • fonat rontainiag 1002 of the programing vich dis[ribu[iom through [he local oemapaper. {chile the preceding discuss ion piacea cmpiaint activity in proper penpactive, ve hasten to say that in no iastan<e do ve rest on our Lure la of wstwer servfce. My complaint is a blaish on our aerviee and our bus {seas i^ aerviee. Out policy. and rith rare exception out performance, is to respond to the complaint mifhin 24-hours or on the dry received if the custmer remains availaD le, co make all rtasoaable of Eort to resolve [he comp taint prmpt ly to the twtomer'a sa[isfaetion. In support of [hat Policy and u -n eapte of di lignnce, four employees were terminated fcom the company in 1986 Eor cudeneu with cwtomen a mu ate lephooe animering aervica. Un the .aLj:_ rf o..t saes, there mu owly one inatsnca that the entire ca61e distribution rystem vu ~'au~." '^.:ie n.nurced in Lnuary 19X6 and it endured three hours early in the bm iuen day. She outage vu planned maintenance and performed to bring out headend to technical spec if ica[ion. On mean sverage~ in the 8.760 hours of operation, the company had l63 partial outages affecting 474 homes for • pe[iod of I.43 hours. In reviewing the 12 moeths prior to our ecquisitioa, the company hu had an eat imafed 30X seduc[ion in the quantity of outages sad quantity of homes affected. Cable customers mare awarded approximately $52,465 in service intertup tioo credits iu 19X6. The company performed 25,041 roueine aerviee ea1L uith an average re eponse time of 20.0 hours. The nature of the aerviee eQL reflect a Eull range of sansei from equipment fal lure to unD tugged television seta. On the average, our cable eustomen require m aerv ice call once every tro yearn. yg Nr. Jamea C. 8aokla greh ]1, 1987 Page 7 Further on cm[oser ae ryice ve were reminded by our cm tomes [Aat reaching ua by phone (at ti.e a) can be diffic ul[. In addi[ion Co record grovtb amd changing dat• proceu ing billing ay •tema in 1986 ve ofteatimea fond ouraelwea just abed of telephone obao leaeence. Twice during the year ve iacreued trunk capacity a ve 11 u penonne 1. N we eloaed 1986 we attained • highwater mark in efficiency and thi• to beet ete.plif ied 6y reviewing January and February 1987 resalq: Telepbone Ca1L =All Diyia ions January February 8eceiwed 31.667 29.639 Mavered 29,445 28,508 Abandoned 2.222 1.131 Mavered 931 96S 4~9 Mr. Juea C. flank le March 31, 1987 Paga 11 The following i• • review of the 36 items lie Ced in our Mnwl Report dated March 31, 1986 covering the ero month period ended December 31, 1985, which [he eompsny planned to complete durimg esleodsr year 1986: ACTIONS PLANNDD POR 1986 1) Pill the position of Director, Technical Operations ACTIONS TARDN Patrick Murphy, Director of Technical Operations vas hired January 6, 1986. 2) Fill the position of Pice Preeideo[, Marketing S Sa le• 3) Drs Et a Preventive Naiotenanee Program by January 71, 1986 4) Implement by March 31, 1986 5) Send top ttthnical personnel te' training aesinan on Lmu rv IS-1] wnA ]n-]9. IYNR 6) Revamp and upgrade system he edend by mid-February Ray Pearson, Pice Pru ident of Marketing i Salsa ru hired March 7, 1986. Completed on •ehedule. Lplmeated Nsrch 14, 1986. Completed on schedule. Completed in January 1986. 7) Recruit, hire and train Completed March D, 1986. eighteen installers living in the Ci cy of Long Desch along rich Chree inaes llat ion •upeo- visors end a ner instal Lion manager R) Replace the construction manager end comp le [e rebuild of Long 8e ech end Signal Hill Cuple[ed ILrch 7, 1987. 9) Bring e11 subc onctected inste lletion rock in-house by October 1, 1986 Wu completed in part but not in fo[o due to extremely high volume of bus inese and ner housing aura. J V Mr. Jamrr C. tin nh In March 31, 1987 Pmge 12 AC710NS PI.ANNBD POS 1986 10) Implement • uoagnent coons Chet rill develop and polish supervisory and unageven[ ski1L 11) Develop and implement an amnesty progrm for those receiving cable service while na[ paying for ihm IZ) Dy field audit, sweep the cyst em of illegal vieven 13) seduce cable rates and coke package of services adore attractive 14) Market to senior cit isen population by replacing Bome Theatre Ne[vork rich American Movie CLuics 15) Satisfy the sports apps[ its by lauoehiog Prime Ticket Network as a buic service rhi le positioning Dodgenision as en -....ou wn~ upaion 16) Bring Adver[is ing Sales in- houee on the expiration of agreement rich the contracted company 17) Develop ^ new Advertising Sales Division of the company 18) Change the name of the company 19) Notify Times-Mirror Gble of our intent to change Di Ming se rvicee 20) Meke management of the company more acceaaib le to subs cribs rs ACTIONS TAEEN Wae implement td in April. Tve lve supervisors completed the three unth program. Tvo thousand illegal men were found. None prosecuted. Two thouund illegal users were found. pone prosecuted. Implement ed Februery 21, 1986. Implement ed Pebruary 21, 1986. BTN went out of bus ineee in Apri 1, 1986. Implemented Februery 21. 1986. Completed in lls rch 1986. Began in March 1986. Completed Februery 21, 1986. No[if ied in Pebruery 1986. Began Gble Feedback program Ma rth 4. 1986. 5l Mr. Jamu C. Nank l• March 31. 1987 Page 13 ACTIONS PLANNED PDN 1986 21) Beplsce~ upgrade and add to our flcet of service veh is lee vbi le properly identifying them 22) Cive balance to EEO program at •11 lave le of nployment 23) Necruitl train and Aire a Direct Sales Department 24) lle[n in and supervise our Telemarketing Department 23) Introducc • more effective Program Cuide while making it available to .11 aubecribeis 26) Upgrade Public Atceu studio 27) Implement • billing system that can be [coded at this location while hewing payment rude locally 28) Dee ign end diatrib u[e all mew Marketing meterie is 29) lq[roduce •ame in Sp en ieh ee ve 11 as Englirh 30) Ertend the ry rCem to unbui It •reu of the city 31) Have incumbent inrtQler• end to chnici aq• take the •eme tra ioing program ee our new pare onnel 32) improve the hrretofgre poor image by dewing attention to the caeca lt• of those chsnge• ACTIONS TAKEN New service fleet delivered in April 1986. Program contioue• to exceed the federal guidelines. Began in April 1986. llp to full •tff in Hay 1986. Completed in Nay 1986. Completed March 21, 1986. Completed in two etageel in Jaqusry 1986 and by midyear 1986. Completed in May 1986. All Customer Service Depaztment• were crow-[reined and centrally loc aced. Completed in February 1986. Completed in February 1986. Comple cad 1956 target ere ee iq November 1906. Completed in Nay 1986. Large iy an an-going program vie Ceb le Feedb eck program end cue[omer su rvey e. Mr. Jame• C. Aank It March 31r 1987 page 1M ACTIONS PLANNED POR 1986 33) 8u ild eubaeriber bus ACTIONS TAKEN Achieved • oat pin of Aeerly Br500 subscribing houeeho ld• in 1986r • 22x increue for the year. 34) Aeduce churn 35) Add vholuome progumming when it fil It • void 36) Aave officerr end directors join end part ie ipefe in local •erviee club organic e[ions Reduced churn from b.OS to A.71< On-going program - began February 21. 1986. Company off is ere end di rec[ore hwe joined end ere •etive in The League of Nomen 9'oterer Koury Clubr Dovnt ovn Lions At eoeiet ionr Long Beech M{storiul Society end Chamber of Commerce. Ne believe the[ 1986 hu been • banner leer for Gble Telerieion in Loog Beech end for oui compeny'• efEocur no[ri[hsunding • •igmificent fiscal foes. Technical performeoce end customer service dame[ ice lly improved over prior year's. and 8,500 addtt tonal homes vtth over YUrUUU more peop to rare vaccning Cable TV. More progra®ing options ve re offered, and consumer utiefse [ion imcreaeed. Although we still have improvements to meke~ 1986 vna a-very good foundation on vh icfi [o can [roue building. ~u lly submic cede Prank G. Mc el lie pre•ide~[ 6 General Men agar PCM!vgf Enc losuree (2) - Fi nanciel S[aC emen[e - Advertising Rnte Card ,5 3 ENCLOSURE 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION SIMMONS' PARTNERS ~5 11"I'ROUCC'I[Oti :V hmtc A'uvorc Capital seas one u(thc first senn:re :api oil orFani:ationt in the L'nimJ $t:rtcs, ,md eontinucs m he a mafor partic:panr in thu truhnvv. Por os~cr'i wars. Allaam has pnni.ie.i eVU:p' iman[tpg for a wide sanerv of huvncsscs and tcchnologms. Allstatc's (i nt cnn:rr invcamatt was in lontrol Data Cop+nration. anJ •m¢ that time:\IAUre has .nJeJ rnpi ntl m o+rr 1JC business rntcrp nscs l'urn•ntly, more than ICJ .~ npanies arc renresen[<d in the•:1Ilma:c pmdulio..^.'.a k:ng it um• r(thc largcv :n the s'<nmrc capital huvncss Allsr;¢r i<in¢rested in smiVUC inrestm<nt ^nPnrmnhics in cccnomic cnvlronments o((rrlnC high growth potential. R'hilc sclatirc :n the t nmmit moot of funJs. Allstarr .:pProachcs vac h in. ostment Jiligatt h' anJ works inclose parm rr<hip with rha manaCcusnt of the rntr q~rnv )v INVESTMENT OVERVIEW INVESTMENT SUPPORT Aihnt< Venture Capital is funded by the capital rewuren of the Ailnate Imunrme Company. These funds, wmbined with the expttienee of our pemnnel, give Allstate a broad capability for making inm[menn, and for helping those investmenp to succeed. Allstate does not limit invutmenp to particular indwtrin or geognphinl locations. The Albnte portfo8o currently include companin located throughout the United Snm, with producu and rcrvicn In both uchnology and noroteehnolo[y indmtrin. A Wnte also comidrn invn[ittg in buainerrn at variow stager o!development - from enercprcneun seeking "reed opital" to unblphed comWnies needingmtwnine flrtasseing or being considered for leveraged buy.oup, Albnte is panicularlY in<erea[ed in unimte produce or rcnicn that addreu large potential marker and offn compelling ttotwmic 6enefin. An epuiry invnmr, A16pte'• objective is to commit rtxourcea to high growth enterpriser which will eventually return significant capiml gpim. Alhpte Venmre Capinl works closely cash the com Wnin in which it invub, winin[ the matugemcnp to attain their maximum wrnin[ potental. This auisnnce take many different forms, but the objective is always the long tem aucetxa of the busineu. '!o this end, Albnte perwnnel brings grnt del o(bmineu experience to each venmre, enabling them to Wrticipate in the planning and impltmenntion of company strate[i<s. Allstate can alw help by idm[ifyin6 assd rttmifing mamgemem and technical perwnnel. Backed by the rcwmcp of the Alhtate Imunnce Company, Albnte Venture GDital h caWble of caking ehe Ian[ term flwseial commitmenn that can be cmcial to the sueeeu o(emergin6 companies. In addipon, rttognitian of the Allspt<tume imparts crcdibiliry to any company that lisp Allmte Venmre GDinl amon6 ip principal invnron. consideration in the invutment decision is the management team behind the business plan. Allante has found that the people behind an cntcrpriae arc the beat indicators o([hc investment's chances for suecus. Therefore, Allstate Inoka For dedicated, capable individwls with strong backRrounda who have Jemonatramd the high degree of motivation neeeasarv (or creating a su<eesaful husinns. Alletate'a invenmcnts ranRC (rem 5500,000 to 55,000,000, Wh<n capital needs and risks rcnuirr more than on<invutoq Albtatr will art as Icad inv<swr in capital xrndication.a A well cuahlinhcd member o(tlm venture capital ~~~ muh. aiiatau ran provide .Hong supp^n for management Icama wcking.wbatantial financial hacking. S~ INVESTMENT PROPOSALS Allstate Venmre Capihl en<oungn emerging and ota6lbhed busineawa requiring financing to wbmit invotment propoula for consideration. Although Albtate will diuuu propouls informally, uriama evaluation cannot begin until a complete businw plan has been wbmitted. A well.prepared buainw Plan will include the following material: Executive Summary. a brief overview of the buainw plan, including key elemenn ne<eaury for a prelimitury urcening Deuription of the products and urvicn Uewrip[ion of cotnpany opendona, technology and hciliNn Company hirtory and firunclal background Outline of the wrkcting strategy Amlysis of the vJarket and the competitive factors to be comidered Profiler of th<managemrnt team, including raumea of the key members Intended uw of funds Financial projections, including cash Bows, Profit and loss statemems, and balance ahte[6 If a preliminary review of the business plan indicate a possible interest, Allstate Venwre Capital will conduct a ehorough evaluation of the compans, its personnel, and the proposed business plan. All information received by Allstate is held in arictnt confidence. URBAN INVESTMENT PROGRAM Alhtarc also makes (ands available m minori ty owned and oriented huninesata. Its Urban Invratmrnf PmGnm npetatcs with the same goab and procedures as thr rot of Albtate Venters Gpital, bm with an added focus on "joh creation" - bringing bualnesa capital and employment opportunities m ewnumically depressed areas. PERSONNEL Leomrd A. Batterwn -Director Mr. Batteewn is a gnduate of Washington University (A.Bd, Washington University Law School D•D.1, and [he Harvard Buainoa School (M.B.A.). He has been an operating executive and entrepreneur. Oliver M. Darden -Senior Inveatmem Analyst Mc Darden 6epn his career with Allstate in 1971. Rejoined the Venwre Capital Divialon in 1952 to Adminhrcr the Urban Invcatment Proyam. Me Darden received hit B.A. from the UnNenity of Mlchipn, and his M.B.A. from Nonhwdtern Univeniry. Dmuld R. Johnon • Investment Manager Mr. Johnwn Joined Al6nm Venwre Capital in 1961, followini several years in induury and consulting. Me Johnson received a B.S. in Industrial F.ngine<ring from Iowa State Univeniry and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. Hie primary interests include telecommunications. factory automation and nrhrr r<rhnnlnw. Robert L. Lnstina, Jr. • Investment Manager Mc Lestina received a B.A. from Valparaiso University and an M.B.A. from De Paul University. He started his career with Alhuu• in 1967, and joineJ the 6cnture Capita! Uivisinn in 1970, Mr. Lestina is primarily intcrotcd in Imcr stage, nonrtechnical ventures anJ IcvcragcJ buyouts. Sherri E. Marcie • Senior Investment .Anaiva Ms. Marcie is a graduate of the Univc rsuv u( Illinola, Northweurrn University IM.I4.A I an.l also holds a C.F.A. Jegrce. Shc mined .1llauu r , n 1978, following several years with the heJc r,d Reserve Bank of Chinpo whrrr du• gvnai ~ ~~,.i in merger and acquisitions. Hcr primers interuta are international venture capital, nfficelfactory automation end hcah h con Raymond A. Obrochta ~ Financial Anal Yre Mc Obrochu rcccivcJ a B.A, from LuYnla Univerroity. He is a C.CA., anJ he has workeJ with Alheate since 1957. He is the Departmental Controller for Allsate Venwr< Capital. PauIJ. Renze • Investment AnaIYH Mr. Renee joined Alluate in April. 1985. after six years with Firsl Chicago Corporation working with entrcprencurial companies domestically and in Swirrerland. He holds a B.S. from lows Smte University and a M.B.A. from the Univeniry of lows. His primary interests arc in life sciences, communications and leveraged buyouts. Marc 5. Sandroff • Investment Analyst Mr. Bandroff joined Allstate in March, 1985. He mmten degree at Univeniry o(Chicago in health policy and management. previously, he succevfullY founded and operated a health care cnmpanv and later, pursued venture capinl and leveraged buyouts at a private merchant banking firm. His primary internts am in health services, medical te<hnoloRirs, enmmunicatiom Marcy H, Shockry ~ Senior Invnemcne Analyse Ms Bho<kcy is a graduate u( Dencwn University and the Univrrsity o(ChicaRU fM.R.A.). Prior 1u joining Allstate in INK 1, shr wu cmploycJ in the managemrnt trainmRProgram nl Pirsl Chicago Corporation wilt rapericncr in leasing and cammrrcial Irnding, Ms, Shoc krv's currem intercau include in/ormauun a•rvicrs anJ medical proJucts, as well as imnl menu in the urlicr naRra Snna Wang InvcnUnem Anahsi \I n. Wane is a RraJualc rat CUnLrtd 1, ni. rnnrl Schnoi n(F;nRina•crinR and tine hw vaern Univcrsilv'x Gmaiuan• tieimni ,~I M.uiayrne~m Pr a lu joining Allstate in I VNn, she ax. employe) wirft Inu9 l'ornorannn where <hc manaRRJ various manufaclnn ml and ntarketinR lone nom. 69 ~ -. --- I N'I'RUUUC'I' IUN • TAAmivlu uafrwtrurdars ~(P~bm1r/.g i. Ha.mn and Pob AW. Orevnisd in 19KB, memoa.uofWoNat and nve npovnadfirnuin W unmrempiw:aevq. WrMu imM.d~m..saorm maiam6rwgAa4goand in nmMaa a W lhia. 7Ao,Jirin hm d.wen+abtmnio//'awdu mm 4a rmae.e mnear.mp'wpMmr- +b0 in OraamlryaiN eur t500,WJ, OPDofmm.ifrdmp- blundnmamyemml. Qno6j~- liu u m idml~inualmml apporlaniew in mdl mvm pd romfanw in,{rwolF indmhiu ^.llr^'nd tlaPwsntialforliSnl' ant My-eom myimla/ipala~ (ion, Inaddi~ mquirymyild, 1M Off In.. ~.nq mTFIYnIO fllf [)pf rat[ Olld [~P[lif 11[[ aJO IO~f profrsrondsmg'arda Munrk of unfalamlrcu. Tw nmrlj tm dmrdri, TA hm uwknl rlmrly uith Wmlud mamFemmtfmrm m bn'NrompaniooJlynifimnl wlue. TMu luavoul M(fd w mak. urfirm IM indwhy Godn Ihal I ,... c I ituaMay. ~~ g BtiUU gC1(ti nF I:\ \HStll l\I P> 'I)\ A,vx I,IIr. x'.'4n e, le n pmnrt wish she mnnagemem maim of iu Ivnlb•hn„I,ntaluer, adJing Jlnru<nt and value thnwgh a dox working rtlo Ilundnp wnb n,.lnatomrm 'I'hr drgrtt ofswr inwdwmcm depends on a num~ Ircl vl la, lur.. ml hn Lllg Ihr err nl the Investment, she stage of the company i development and the nerds and dmirts o(the management. The firm is goner :Jive Innmyln.~~.mr.mA dxs not inwlw itulfwiththcdayto~dsyopera- .. TaMws Cmpomriun uw a.mrr. oom o(a hu5ines.. Ih15 mepsmtbiGly scm wish management. y twwJarwr<. oJmagr,rrir ,ado in 1977 rdsrn TA Asauiaw (hv pnunmener In the semm~ capital indmtry it a xflmion of the _ aa(dalamran fsswtorard a unique rcuun e. avallahk wnhln TA Avmiato. Ponfolio companies have IaendarofUSr Bmdoffh'mrbn. asceu to Ihex di.cra• mwurco Ihtoughws their avociasion with the fiml [ogee Ad ofCapibl TA Asxntatevsthr larga.enmse capital pannetshiP in the coumry wish waNitimn/fi.tmairsga lad A!' 1 /aruitrad si Jand !q! Tendon naer {$hb,llpp,Ipt1 of committM npital under management. lirmadhdara) m rsfwt'lion rti< The large pmt of capital rnablcs us w prwide a wide variety o(financing aternatiws to cnmpanxa In variws sages o(developmens, from clan-Ups to ala~In}era ntanY~11(fu1[I Of ' u - d.aerr-siJM duk d.:aaa. 7n cnahlishcd husincvcs, in a number ofdiflctem indwtrin. Is is <omtrton far m ro provide the Inuial capital (or a company atM m continue to ptwid<finartcial ostey798I, 0x xvmpvny rvwd suppon thtvughnst the venom stages of tU growth, 'ITr nze o(the lusldr lS,OW,000 in on inirialpuNir I Sn'y. Tardon u stoso 1M /md- under managcmcm enablo TA to hose a truly longterm inavtmem philssu~ y pndtaer oJ,/iopq duk dnso µry, wvann unuucyrcssurt m Ilqumam Inacnmcnts. Inwnmcnn byTA Avociatcs mngc in siz< fmm f1,000,IXq to namdlampurm, sroM pmrr.. T20.fp0.IM10. TA has been making new inaamrzms o(appmxtmatch .. and in411igenr re.mim4, f Itq,0IX1 O(p a scar m rcr<m v<ars ~sA nr1 ra4s u<mdirt_q f_apnsma Orgamsdln l!HAI.i'Annnr of lhcnldcst and moss cxprrvnmlfirms in :00,000,000. the Indusu) 'lire pnJee.ann:d aaRoflhe Gnn mllatiwly has Imr I"+n scan n! • rxpcriamc In pmvidmg linannng to gmwmg mmpantn, mom than hMl of those )can at TA Acaocrmca. 1'h< mdmdval bsckgmuMr of she stag rnnspnx Y a range of rtkvam <xpcrinmr, umluding (man<ial expenlx, managonrm mu! olxraung rxprranrc anA tcchnuloglW undcrslanJlnq I ,, I T ~GarM . ... .. . . ... . . TA Asmciatn u an arrive invenor and will work clmely with mnnage~ mmt m ansaurt the appropriate fisundng fora company. We have been Ihr krod inveaa in appmaimuely 85 perms o(wr invmtrxru since 1980.7'A has wlficirnt upiW rnourtn to be the ade provider Ma company i equity finvscing, At the urta time we welmnse the opportunity to invrx with aher 4arieneM vmtua firma. Siva 1900 mm hal(o(wr initial imeaments in ampanin have klduded co-vsveaon. aimy Fmr • The firm imvra maidy in sxlmobgymmpanin, mcd'u commumu~ riau smnpaniu and kenged buyvun. Ourlarge pm(eabnal na8dluws individuals within the fine to be speciality, fxvsing on spnific indumnes anJ making invvtmrnu in relamd area. 8urh spaialiration cnadn unto xan quickly W gipwmnnia and make a pautiKmntrihutpn Inver portfolio mmpania. raarliaaaf C,wfafr . TA ASSOdxo'tsetwpk anodsvmrNwide. (brt(dioampanm wchx AST RneasN, Carsmld Ilan Hyaems and XHL f:ommunkalions have Iakrn f advantage dthu atworis whm suing upogshort manufx:uring. In addi~ tion, thu ratwvrk can be useful far onpvding intemalional product Jimilw~ Lion, inituting txhndogy tramfm a nnbliahing Joim .cnlurts arlJa6'a Neuurk•.. .. TA Auaum hn an hiaeriral Nasionshipwith over YW pnnkrhn mm pm,io uu vuncryu n,uwu,.. wg ...................:..::..::.. ....:.......:.....: passes, mmprixd of leading univenilia, coryoations and finanud :nsmu Iimm. Thcx contxu W by cxtmmely uxful in a variny of <IGIn. rsubLduu¢ OEM xlalionships or markning agrecmenU, gnling highdael n., n.:~: polenlial customers, rtcomumnding outside dirnlors and pr:widinR , .qm,J in Ialer private or publ'm financings. lpnimrd Umar Aneprmnlaliae from TA Aswcialo onacompanYilawd of dncn~n. mmms scats M ill of the rvwr<a ofour Grm The firm i rxie~r:ru, ......1 rnniaas can he uaful in munxling managemem m such x. n. in:~. .. d. r ~I: •i :nq bumsns and financial nmmgin, WcmifyinR anA R: numrc A:..::.,~ . . ,.,.,;h.,rm.L;;r aurrgan;f ;cad;ng fu:::m p:;rar. ::....... .. ~..~... .. , wuh looks, (:pA'n anJ insemmau bank. Jwww//mrmm~Ltiop• Wilh alarRCpmfnonnd:Iagand nlhrcs nn lroih: o,e.... ,.. ~:~ „~. prnmuwg aompaninmdl mgroro of the Unnni ti,ao. ECADun nweMm rompa^/ uatid ado aaJfmrt prwdarb r/raf allae insgmn/ nnvit m;iram b rerify fhrirda- syru• ]'amlap~mrj Ave araerkaaina aS^^asarr uilA 11°baS CAE Iambtatian arnnaw/^ty^^a anals v Dniry Sy+b.na. Mmbr Cmphira and CECafaa fk7rm Tk nyprunrM/ ECAD, tA:. r uLl/,f£.Lsp:n<grmafnfis- abL AlehoudA ECADdid rot M.. a rnpird rand, elaumpaq :mnlM twfrmgfMn ib 6nbm rh.rr ua,l hr nr.o.asrd uoth an r....,., r.,pr„rnrrdnmm,. rap'sai nu.nnr 9A u r.pnsmted on sM &.,ol ,~f lh.Rlnn N INV FS'EM h: N'I' h:VALUATION CRITBRIA TA Avociarn ha nkrn a delibenu appnenh is leaanong ns Ixurlidio by !nutting in vaiwa irdmrry s«mn within nc~ r«hnohsgy nn~na along wnh ~ spttific non-rKlrra{ngy actton mch az mrdia <ommumcarmns and h<ilthcan ' urvicn, Funhcrdis,:nificarion a provid<d by Inucstrn¢ m sompnncn Ihnwghwl ap wgeafgrmHh. Thcx range fwm aramuq, where TA may n.n a+.in in the organnarion o(dx mr„p,ny az w-a the cax rn Bingen, Equinox Synems Horn Diagrwnin, Spinnaker Sofiwart, and Sigmawn Now, en pmfitabk, wxBYaublishd campanin wch a Adams Rusxll, Comincmal Cabkvuion, Information Buikkn, and New England 8usinnt Semen, sanpwomtiwrtgadurH, its ini~ tiah of jm'rrs bmsd a loco con dau PL[. fgaorsamr wgnnimdma saeY-sp is /983 Aj TA Asraivln wlWraesnginarn, Kwin lAmn. I{SOiam Armb .hasardMark G4(fictmsdodmrf. follaw'nS Ur initial inrutmmt, 7A ua jsirrapb~otM unMrgwfs+in saad cord du'N routs fi m rui rMs in 198f aM 19AS. Equt'.rox G~ may pmfNA4 dun.y 19A9 nM rworJd inJirtt i/,000,OAA+a4s nrorrtA in miQ-I985r jwr ou+wn tvr.Jmm ittfourdirrq. TA it m/,- mmtdon theommjanri lkard ajU'rmmn. lhnwrc lnw+.'mmt Cougros.. .. We clavify wr wnturc inrntmrnuin fwrcnmgoria da<rmincd by the companyl wge of groMh at the time ofwr fire msenmrnt These aregorin art az fdlan: Stag kStmt-np. No produn rexenun and lick or no cxpcnx hutory. Swg ll; -kalofmmt. No pwdun resrnua and ahixorya(development expewn. Smg ///: Rsamr. Pledua rtwnua but rra profiuble Stag IV.• Prafifab4. Ptodun reserao, pmfiublc on a trmnthno•rnomh bait and upectM w rtmain pmfitabk. Appwximaely halfolrhe companies in whichTA !ovens art in the nan~ up page through. Nc rcwnue Gage and half am profiuble rompanio ar the time o(imepmenl. Pn.rAmoJmm.Uo.rhalMt Wilhin the pmfiuNc company cakgory, all nra pinion o(ounmear m<m ohen is in nc~ (ono o(a sttnndary purchax in which we buy xmnuo directly from existing sharcholdm other than from the company. Shares Isoughl on a raondary Iwo may com<(rom any rnanagemem member or wude shareholder who daim ro xll all nr same portion ofhir holdings (or puryour o(Iiquidilp i lour! Egarrm SJna^c Cnpwation of AfiprrR F7srida has smngd top' iQ) m a Yr&na s+Pplin oJdaW laawa[d0'0a'd' .. .. TA Amcura alsoattWleaeragal Layout opponunitiu. In lc.cmgal wym,t aituatiau w<Pmvdc rapifil Inanity quilifi~ managrm,w grwps in the purd~ae ofexiging profitabk canpanie. The term "leverage" applin whrn the putdfaae dthc 6usirsm n aaonfplbhcd with the grn<rava ux of debt fiwtcng m auppkmrnf fhc ryuity pmvidrd try TA Aa+ocutes and the managnnmt group. svera8cd buyout opportunities ohrn aria from the spimogofdivisiau or suMidrsrio of hrgedivenified corpor bona. They il+n arise when awnen ofdmdy heW b,uinmea woof to x11 ter erase or orha pcrond liquidity reasons. The marfagement gmupTA backs in a I aqd 6uyouf may be already in place at fhc comprny, rn wuide group m• cmnbinatbn a(both. Exampka d'kwaged 6uywu in which TA hu pankipaxd include numerous radio std television brmdrasting companin and oble tdrrviaion eampania, u well v a manufacturer of xmapace camporferfu,lwo large e tufile companies, a wirt and rabk manufanum, aapccialty rrwaf proaason a computer terminal manufacmrcr, an inurumrnution company, • semi cwd«mr equipr«nt manulanurcr vW a rnanufacmrcr of fanory autos muion machinery, L.,.r.a.,r c.., Ina~ammnhvTA Aswuaus nne<in siu frvm 31.000.000m 120,000,000. Thc rypval vcc of our aenmm capuil insenmenta is {1,500,000 fo f1,fIf10,0(NI Imrzf menu for more nfahhshad snuauons, mdudinq xcond~ ary puuhaxr avA Irwmgal buwws. ur nfmn suhefanualiy Iaryrr As a pmc ficil mumr, invamcnu of ioa than fLfNN).b10 us~dll wdl not be mnsdercd. A company in need of a small amuum of finanunq which d«s nor mttf the minimum siu crifenon may find an mveafinem ran Iz far~Lfmrd W nu-0udmq the anordary sale of come rhams held hr cmaunq aockholden (slrapAV Prlomu TA Anociata has no 4rnMaPhu nepuunvni for hzminn of an coves mov and invansfhnmghom fhc Vnnrd tiiam•.inA l:annda Wr will ufrr invnnlmm~f oVwnana~r:.,.a:. ;; ..:h; .~.~v;:;;;r: ;...:::: ~n:rrnt~~raa: a0ihafa II rl GnnrranW Cdlcoiairn ramfun Jimrrsad el Td dawsiaMa Ml970 rcAen Nrmmpmgkd15,000 aoksraGnuadrsvnw of JY, 800, 000. 77w BamnLv.d firfa Y IrarO rke f~Plamlf arMa srfwaiaw twtpwaj w Nr mrnq,rw4r ma.ae .,.. .sdani6cra of d rmmtwl aJ L4W,000,000 TA javtitipaad in • cord resod firrmrmrg in l97Y, mdmtta l97E MaPsm~ cAud a m !/1,000, 000 of scsk al usriwn dfaafiofn armfakaarmr ord acM aentun mp'W fi mu. TA u uyrvmcdon rh 0amd T ofA'rxren. I N V E 5'I' M E N T F, V A L U A T I O N CHI '1' F. N I ,\ frr~mmrud) Tjpes o//rdu+ei,rSwyM... .. . ... TA Avoeimn ha. inwmMmavarmgn(indmuio m+hown in rh<lin o(rcprexnurim invntmcnumnc~ coil o(rhis bmchurc Howxver, rh<firtni inv¢¢rmcm zriviry conammrn nn rnhnokrgy~bazd manufacturing romps- ninwhkhogenmiyucpmduors. rapid ¢mwrh aril high pmfir margin. In ~~i Emulsxf rfrrmrinn i. eh<Imdrnq the nommanufacmnn¢samr. areas of nxprrnz rndudr snfrwarc, h<alrhran mfrcm.n oJDEGmmpmib4 zrvim,a,d media commun¢auons Indusrno of intcrca indud<, btu art ~~ mm, ,mmse and mmmnn:rnKom nix limbed ro, rh< (dbwing. rmlrotl<r,. 7h romp.rnr uw C¢mputn Mrdwn Hadu CI TVbrmd<a,finq fw+rdd Dy fmi Cox O~rrtuml P p.MnL Cabo ufsrw+ion delwaJ and Wiffiam HMxru in SoJluart Orodr+rb C<f(ufor sadb Cdpogiry 1979. TA Aa,¢ri¢u, (d ,M eery /.lion maim Smrirvndrrmm prsrvtrfimnnryfor E,mu4x in Dam rmnmunimfiov(nad+ru &mirordrrtor ep¢ipmsnt 1990. Thufimnn+yfurd dthr Tilaommunimtiov prodrra Osfsvs s/mnoninpmducu wp mpidSmartAoflMromfnny Tut fr mm,ummmtiruhummm(i¢n Hmlrlsmrx pradun+Ums6¢, wit Ur initialprrer ^(k^^S CAD/CAM/f.AE Biomedvsl y.oductr rim romb4ed in l981. 7k /Mwuml aummarmn y.aeu<t, .+ramml, ti,prx,afry xhnr,iroH Adrent/fl Aabiinq, wn duMDuW + moor limitd yarbr<n in )983. Faur Eq ltequimrrme• In analyaingassnmrc eapnal mrtsrnmm oppnnunny,w<(orus primarily Emu/u rv.,.,rt y ha, sa6a oJan on lour areas. managrmrm, markn, pnxlnu and Irywdny Cenemlly rh< J/00,000,000, TA M1m plny<d an following crimria nttA m tx mcr rco.. mk in mpporr oJEmufu, MarmganvnL'Phc wrrn¢rh of rhr mmragnnrur ream n rhr ormr rmportam yortisr,lody in monagrmmt consdcmrwn in rhr unvsunrm drnann I'Iv o-anr must hav<gnalny. Arprh .muitmm4 and u rcpmmrrA and mawnry Ir nmv Ix rxl,rnrnr rd m rhr rnduarv m whrrh dv company on Uu Boardof /hmrmn. comprus 'I Iv mp m.mnr{rr shmdn heir had pen. prnlrr r vvrr nspnnsdWrrp -- - In the raa nfa srurnya ins po-lrmblr char e.rur menlxn nlrbr trnm has< wnrkM m¢ehc pnvunnly \Lmagrmrnr nm.r Ixr.xss rnwnarr knowlydgr of rhr markn for ns pnxiuus and haver sill rlnnivhr urn marry lur rhr le~nnrn uon nl ibis markn z' - ~/~ Mar.41."I'hc markn nosy havr Xr..l lrnr¢n.rn vr.rwrh prrtgrr rs and.hmlrl Im aulLarntly lar¢c sn rho rhr nnnl.m. ~ rn .r. a v nrgrnhr .uu hrw~ ul s,Ja In rh<s.nr u! nn nulv,aegr , rnu Pn,, rhr• ... ralh mgdrr. rhnr .r :nnnnurm ~ nil n({LI IXMI INMI rn aalr.r do h~ a vd~. venra L.,r near +. rl.nol ~,, ~• I T ~Rrgnonnoul . Haduat. The produn or zrvkc mml br Pmnrieary nnulhrvnlly umqur to mjoy maainahie eanpailiw: adwnuges which enable Ihr company to achicxc a meaningful marYe short and ahoux.averzgv Profitability Lgrlidily. The invdmrnt pcrzpeniac ofTA Aanoclmcs n Inng~lcrm. Nonahr~ Faz, the ullirrwe au¢m ofanyof in invcsuncnu h determined by the zaliv~ lion o(a rapiml gain. Therefore, then maze he agreement on aarnues for nenhtal liqu'rJity. The rrwat common vehidu arc a public ogenng a a rtzrge< with arwdzroaryovtion. W hge inveatmenu arc ohcn hcM (or bnger periods of time, TA Axaocuta typkaly atriez to a<hie\e iquuiily for its m\2xlmenls within a period of fiK to eight years fn applying the abew criteria to levengcd buyout snuatinns, manag<- mrnl urrngth temairu o(utmml imporonce, but marks growth and product uniquemya art kn important than the need for rnablizhcd hhtorid pmfita~ bgity atd prtdieubgity of future earnings and cash flm. (gilj/MidOalia,l.. .. .. All inwtrnmu made byTA Aaa«iatn inwhe some (orm o(equity par f &igtirn W art Iwg-zrm In nalum We do nm slzk mmml and gcncrdly art a minorhy imvton The pementagc ofTA1 cquiry ownerahtp n cfammincd un a cax~by~cau ' haaiz by a cnmbitntion of fume inrludmg the nu of Ihr Inw:almem zlatiw: to me acreu raplw umi. o, JI. vuan K». ,~~, q.,, „~ ..y, , ~ ,,,.. ,.,p..... ... dlc partiNlar iINCIUrt Of 111r hllan~llla rlr frlllrll r•\N'11rc111n lht In\Cal~ meet wJl be <ommrnsurau wuh Ihr •01Mnlunll. ,n~n bn Ihr buvmrsz.mA the pemei\ed Ic\xl of nsk In Ihr I umpem ~ ~qn^ n In¢ IILIn F of lnarNlM• &c\rml forms allmrslmrnl srl unr. .l~nr lxul..v~.l IIIr l,mnl, Inl hldr common stwk, prtfrrrcd mxk. vd.~~dm nrll d.Ln ~.n... nlLlr. ~mA warnnls In rash msr, :hrn n.I,I • yiin, pa u. Iwn„~I, ~, el~ll• theumoum thous all lekr llrv ~,,~,.....II i ~di~ ~n,lo«~~low.~n Ihr anlaonn and lhr llr,lrrn of llo"~~In..l.i, I ~ .I •I~~, ..I~h.I. varmgwl inwuup, u.n .L. ~ ~, I. , . . , , il ~ . ~ ~ ~~ ..~ ln ap„~~~~~~ ~~w t. .nn bar,\fmm,nt lnmrra.lr.vme.I~L"~,~. i ~61..~„n:. ~I~. ~~„~Ihn irlv.l :n rnrly aegr rnm.nnrnl nal.lll.,,d, i,~ mnn~n ~~; ^n~~~~i, .~~.t i ~^Se u~0.MeFeIaO~J fared in 197Euitlfirzosriq five TA axd 44 nwltna ogwml s'~rdl~a cr. nror..a.a mvtdlastlilgnrrlrczllobiafa- air4in4rA'n~Dr. Wallzr45Rart, • IDDO No4f /anent. TA mua re0remfdwr W Rate/af Dira9ara erd Ar/pad rrgNrM Biosen f,~m1 mrpaate rt/azian- rtip, ineltdiyon inrvMSZnaof 7l D, 000,000. In cord c5rmmt~ Pn^l andirr ineufon Faor nird our LB0,000, 000 in gairy erd &enrin,{Jsr. 0yrn tm lhfint mmpoq topatmra ~rsonr- hmnr ONA produn andha. Mer 7/ Amrae and dnebpnvrt r o~rR,en4. S'TR UCTUtiH OF TNF pUNDS FdrrN E'Hr+r w a mmpaq uA.armmrAa+AKamr,7nany- mwr ruilA mamy(M drlirvryof pnenryparka~n TA AUaia4+ parrisipaad in ek+mnM Jhsossiry in /u73aMindl+uA- rywnr pnw4jmonnrsg+. Wr +typaaai tkmmpany:n ow o/ Ahe mmt dam/ prnade in tk Aulory of tk r.n tua mpird in- dwsry. ])v pvr/erur and cork of ek imarro.r and tk marv~emmr mm acre m.arided in April u/ /9791wun !k company raid appronmuu/v !10.000, 0110 in nn imm/publu a~ n(. The mm~ pony nmrnNV M1ru hvM mvnw. ord n ~mr4ir wlw gfnm fY.(NXI, (HXI, (/09, Ynnm FaMr TA Auocutauthe grneW pananasd inve+tmem managerda Emily o(n<nwm capita hud+whi~h inven pdtnardy in trchnabgybued mmpanin in the United Staa. The nurdcus ofthd lutd+u Adrnt V, a limited partner ship with cwnmittrd capita dfl6B,171J0,000.71sh ford wuotganixal in 1987 ardu drc wauwr to Isar adicr Adwst lutd+whieh arc crow fully inwtW. Joining AJwm V in odr inw~rtrmit K sneW companion (und+managad u wA IryTA Aaociaw. The rota mnmiuM capita ofthe Advent pvtnenhip and related renwrtlusds eaaeds 1500,BOB,BJO. SB/Ci TA Awnata alw marugnanumbcr olSmallBwinnelmatmm Compsnia (SBICL) whose ripiWu ptwidcd by the pwnenhip Nnd+mem honed above. Invvttmma o(the SBIC's am principally in dm medu canmu- niratiom bdmryand genaagy ukc tM form dwbwdi.med deb with wamanu m equity amcaian fomrn. /wrmmom/Am'rYra •' Cur internatiarW invntment xtivitia are anndutted ihraugh various aH~liata dTA Asweiatn includin8 Adroit ImmwiaW Corpontian. Thee afiluta are dncribed mmc fidlyan page ten. IITW{Ibtmr GpiW roc Ad+rnt VsM maampanian furdsuprwided 6ydmnatic std foreign limited parmen whottxSaiR dkading fiwioal irutitutiau, major comnmtirm. •.n.:r.~a..a.~.~~}~-;:~,_,, ;,,•,•„~,,,;wni+uw mawpuL+. Ourlimited pwmmirrcludc: , FimvW /nnrtwwnr Bank oJN Rryfard, NA. Ymnur Cap'ed Comrnon7iwf Furd ekrkrraw Mawsemmt Corpaulion CBFlnraemmn, A Hi9man Compwy ClCNAYmua Capn'W, /nwpomtd E/arm Haws, Erylard F.mp/orm lruumrus of Wmuau, AMutud Comporq Tk Fiat Natiomf Sant ofCh4ngo John Narmk Mufwl Ly4lnmvm Comparq Man:farluma Nanoav lrwnnnm/Corp., /run+lrnene Marwgr Mrllon Bmtk, N.A. Mnmpolimn L~fr Ir.rnmreR Canepany Nrm Ere`kM Mumd Life lruurvnn Canpanj Omar Fimrra, NY., N tMknd+Annlfrs ! Aoudenl Mumd L(fs /wurvroe Company of PldfadelpAw Tk Prudmlid /wumna Company nfAmmia I righ~l Finvaid /vAtatwu SOFlNA SA, (uanaad) Smtnd Aaoiva laolaenf C^^rP^nJ I.'aikd Smtavfr lnonlamt 7lwe CerwpsryLiaild Sigm/hsuars, ATaknAdMry Crag, SinAsmn lavfwtM P/imk larnily! TY-I YmmaCap:W Parl+.+bp Uemvi9r Fwdowmlt Fu,rG ... .. Aenav Vmmv CapomNar (flaad Unu+'^4) Babsn Cd48e Bake Uan.,:ry Braun Unimnry Cloak Vnimnry Nokv Gann Unu+rd) Pmu /rvGfak RAedr ldm.d 91rw1 of Duyn rsi d Ud S 6 r w tay y SwrfMsra GBvp {YJlioav OAlga Ya4 Udavny hniw Fudr• •! A.... Bvt~ganrY~pf B.Y..aMed'mldSAd(Puuen Mao A nm Cwpvra/ivn Mmm TrvrBJar P.nrplr¢ Mnwerr P4v Aaa PiGn Inc. lAwvin Play earrk aj Bavw Aairarml Tw1 eayBmvkv, lnv. Mnrivrr 7M NorhraB, Inv. Alub TM IMmrkurenmmurivrvn~.nr rw. .SrAm'na.PbuSA Brtuvrnent Twl Smrs Pnuion Twl Cwpowlav Cd (11M TAv BemdsrSCrwp fnnugie !urJm W ivn v,(Nau Yak Enhrprivu Qw'!ma SA 8.~(k//-0P.orporvfim lNf,O, l.d. B.maT Anol.,q Dal^Pna^l Cwfa°li°^ /irlik (.'erfomvian Ynlvmol InkrgrWp. In[. '/h. P4nry fanpa~, Pk HIa.4 /.land /forpiul Tnuv Nvisrti riinl Mdlm Faarda/im /Ar.6ndridke Cerpwa+n YAnaan FmnAild Fwnrdav:n 1'umev AG f1u.Pbrdmd(Nf mpaj afOM'o 1)a Waryr Fumiy Tool ~g Amv.ivwrMdia, lru. umf in f9M b~TA A.aivln and o amvalmmv ma tdgAla Bd (psMVdhWs)blewY~. Im6ad.aP baalwveiy arn• pay. AanivmrMdnarydrd rdiepoprtiu a Iwy rrlmd in 1981. !n l981, Bnaarpsg agnrda Bdninerv PMrY4w ruins opmBry mrh flora and Irwnay/rva vn. in.sa.i~ eir mapanjapiorda Smr Anal FM..mivn,. fi mmd rr~nrelY/^ irum.ad dank 6a,adryl.. 71a compaq'a aval Idrr Aar inns kmfaNvirns l9B/. ~~ i ]' I I I< \\ I l i~\ \ I 4 f P 1 I„ I \'I' N..ti 'I'A Asnnimn has plryM an xtim rdc in rnabliahinq an inremational n<tmvk of acnmm capital funds. Contacts dnsxrgh thcx (uMs art uxfW w pmfoho companin baking m cnpand inmmationil dis4ibutbn or ro sr.1 up nlGhom manufxmring fxilitio.77x oscrxas agiliaca nfTA art at (Mbn: hod. twmen. •puy Pr^6ra"r •CaneilW lniroW Gp(4I Adwnr Mamgrmmll.rd. ldrdan. l:'n,~land IA91 J90,1g7, 000 Ad.mr Nc¢um N.V AwseL, Oe!¢rum 1787 /0,000,00(1 h'nur,sm.ovV v.. ,Grcf9olm, .Garden /9B? IS,OIXI,WO faMµl A, fl. seis'iC 15ngaporc Cd Ma6ysn /98J 39,000,000 TVMT naa Vmmm ifan4h,Cmmvny - /983_-- 57, 000,W0 Mana,~rmrnr AdunlT hv~Vmmn ToAin,./ayan - /98/ 71, 0OO, OLO AIpAa Ararier _.-.- .~fbru, F'mw 1935 73, 000,OG\0 Horimn4 VmWns Vrmm. Amnn_ -_ IR95 _--_-- /3,000.000 Thcx mTrum (amts invet pnmarily in their Iwl regirms with nrca- sionsl mrgacd in.<.atmmts within dl< llnitM Sdxa. Additional seas +rnmm rapnil alfiliatn in Hong Kmtg, Auxrelu and clxwhcx am mm~ in the pnnxss of fnrmaaon An mdcpcndov organivrtinn dIM Adscnt Intcmaoonil Coryomtian was (mmnl in 17A4 by Vnrt A. tlrrrokc, th<! nding pann<r ofI'A Aawci• _ airs Adsem lnrarnadnnal helps torrorrlinam th<int<mrlinnalrRnnn ofmr. rrvenem alAhaio. h pnrvWo dc.clnpment urvirn mrh v unmgk planning and lahnnlrrgy tmndrr for mrpmm~ons and gmcrnmcnu, u well v (ocuaN imm~mmt pmgm ns Adam lmarotionalcmals~ xvw pnrdMio cnm~ - Ivn4e in uvonaurnt.J bmm<sa dev<Ioprrmnt, srwrting and manufacturing, I~e..I (:UN'I'A O'I'INU "PA ASSOCIA'f 8$ We wdcmM inwnrrxnt pnryswils (.wn a nxnpany'.s principals M fmm imcmudiuin for the company. Whik the adaal inwtmrnt dauian ran be mark ~Y qukkly when Mcesaary, early wntan in advux. Man anticipatd financing nccdu <rwwwgN. Ispuirv may bedimcgcd by tdcplwrK or in writing to anY mrmbuM dx TA Asmciates stag'. i(thc invvrnrnt opportunity prnmmd'u Mintcrm, mcctinp wish managemrnt will be rvvng<d to begin a thorough evaluation M drc buaimr. Recognidng thu arsangissg financing ran be a time-cwuuming agivity for dx managesnvst Ma buair~m, TA makn every <gan to ropord prmnPdY m imvtmrnt pmpmdu Badw p°x In cvabnting a pgrntial inv<ummt TA Amcian normally requcau the mbmission Ma budrim plan. Thu Md nd be a formal docvmrnt. but dieuW be a wrinrn prvmwion nhkh irclude the kgomng: A brvrfln'rlepoJUr<°'aP°7 Mx^pfrnefAr^Lrrb, infrarinayr.priram)arp~y (Vowrpasffiraal4anf°Sa f Amyair aJW arm,M aiv, 6rwr1A frasfcb mdaompafitirn lkampion <JEunxna sad wm6tins tlmaesia b b e,rtply W lfunl.iml mJpnjsedfinanria(aWnnmb Oufh'n<oJmp'W rgtl:nsank ou~mu `Y "'J \mmaenrr,nparamrm Firabluh~np ha.lr (boon As nmcd cadke, Ihmugh iu many ycan M<aperiena and Iarge nag. 'I'A Asvriata hu de\eioped apFiiliud knowledge abmn industry srctnn and ficexs individuals' egoro nn Wcntifying well managM companies within dmx x<tors. We srtk oul the induary kndcrs and iniiiatc contau wish Ihar n\al~agflMllU in many rimauum a rapiW nrtd may rat yn niat. lilmc.cn'I'A Ixlicw early I onlact inneful in bugling a relationthip whkh wdl pm m+r firm m a Irosmm~ m mm any proemW fvmrt raquirtmeu for rapiW.'flus undA Ir ~...rr for gnmah or to pm.ide ipuidity for eaming nu~khnkiers, mdudnig ~.. g;n:u-d,l.y tirc Jnnl yur.ha><M.ham fmm lhcm.'Wnh ouoinnirl ~nm{wn ,when TA iniliatn[he carllad, sobminion nfa lnnnal bunnes. pbn n Mmm~sly nut a prtrcyuuim !or inmtmcnt Iir.rnl I'RO Ph;titilONAI. ti'I'A i'h' "Ibc pnrhnavm:J xcJl a~ IAA..vx vnrxsh:RlJy qu:Jifxd .nul cxpcrinrcd in acnmm,upn:J uman,g 'ILr unll'hrmgx many P'an of ozpcrkrmc in nc~ bwi- rman and IinanroJ mm~a nuvlrvl m pnrvek mprym anJ cnvrrucrivc coumd+o the manaGrmem of pmfMim nmrymlaa. (hcr.Jl, n is one o(the largm vrnwrt eapiul manaRa'mrm Ruxgn m ihr onamry,'ITc WWII is IarGc rnough ro emble IM: firm m mkn xlvannp~ u(ihe Ixnuliu of xpcci.Jiniion.llu pmforbnal xuRai'1'A A.wxwra u unnprixad of Jm (Mp:winR indrviJuala: pMVe Cap,xl Crwp C. Keuin Inrdry Afa,m,R,ne l7nfnn Bain P. Ardrerm hic/nn (:mnvl Porcn~ - _ .. _- ~'~ Ja qurfins C. Mwby /:rmo/fL.ar. ._ .___ ~aAfm A J•L'JT ChanMa (:emd Po.avr .. .. fb6Ab Reden W. Anl~ _%brta... -_ - Baaan DwraWJ. Kmnrer Pony Bwlw MiablC. Ck'h/ .. Viv lloidxar fWA/b JaM L. fhocSJr. Auaiav ____ Bagr Br:mrJ. C^nu^l' Auawa --..- -- Baar Nabil El-Hoav Aracuv ---- Halon Hay Kwrrrr Auauv Bahr Ludo C. Wimw6 A»aav Ba4n fob B.KNj T..... M PAPA. ArWjrr I...I... Polo Aln ra%SMn B. wall, - A:agn ~-._-_ - -- Bawa r ulA. whr'k A.d/n ---- -- lwnAm Marla C vwwu (:mop .. Divwd D. Crd! Afaaeryy PoMn Barton 12iPhurd //. Chme7ul(,,Jr. (:mnvl fb.inn ._-_ _~~ _- WiBium P. Cdfaw /brr,~ . -_._ _ _. _ _ . _ ~~ _ _ SlapMn R fwrm4y lMrvr ..._ _ - .._ IIaYn Jana F. Wadr Ar,awa ~ ~ Baron Adwa %nvrnvwW. .. . . Paler AA. Brooks l:lnrrmnn and GuJfmwiw~ Roman _~- (apmxn .Mna /nvr:www' f Iw,men Ld Fimre andAbammmvan MrArcl A. Ruan l;m.m/Poma~, ::I A+wxWu C9 f7wYn (3 %A AruPiou Hdry /hrcm, lA Arra4rm Bm/ry Arthur!„Sena! /bnaa /'A Aa«wa Nary Nabn -- Korhrn'rrS.Cmmn.Pll (bnnAV.,~IAAL«nm Hmvn - I,~i ~l 7/ Pm A. Brasb Mmyo g Psnar (Bonn) Me Bw4 ArW •B.A. dgreJiwn Howl Uwalq(l937)wdw MB.A. Jrw c4r Na~IBnenu Sokl(l9.H) Hem.4rndrra .. eJimr TM Pw Naarnl8wkf $fYn {rJealwwj A/AV b ~ hdeJeS. Y.rHr,n GpiW Drfaawrl efBawnSavim. Hrpu1 Tur6n, AMkn}d'R. L. lAry, /rrt. u ISK3, daadry lbear u T9d6 wdlata Y CAoimmr oJTaker, A,rThm} Hdlny CapmWm, Mr Rrm4Jvrnd7il Arvn.nla in /ASH adua Mmragny Poem oJlhrJrnn. Hr nnw an Nr BaaL eJDirtlar UaMrdb•; Cd~MrI4, l,a,; !/nnra4 (:aMwnn, ad Hmr,~ ldamlavr. Ira. Mr Brink u a6o G'A'nrman ad GieJEmutw UQurr oJAdarrt Iw.rwavl (:orpmm~nn C. Bm'nlad7 M.w,{iy Parrrnn Y.neo.Gp'1af frwp (Bwbn) Mr. (add rmidn B.A. d,dnn w fi'wilvfiw Harwd Uniwriq (IA56)nrda M.B.A./ran Jn IVhagn SM/ e/ Fowur (TASH) A/ln jrsAaron, Mjaind TAAaw~ nb, 6wnerr nlmnd /b.uur m 197?. Mr ladgda aMana~ ur,{ Rvlmat TA rn /JHI ardbmL mrfirm. /mbm (aprld fmup llr anra m,W Ifmw / urabr, nJ Bl'll fnervngp l:orpmwmn. l:,,n livnld lbhbvurm. /,a. lmmum, f;m, lH ..tin/wl (:anpw.. I1Mml,. !ru ard.tiarda /narnuu~ml f..,pn~ wu,n Mr lavfry a4o Ave mrrv/n, e lhrarm of ;!rv5+n, .V I' nml lnv/,.n (bpnrmmn llrcn lhrn m...I il~ ,WVwml /mbrr (:mu W .I ..., au~n 7~ 0lnoid D. CmB MamSiry fbtrrr Malls Cswwuuemiaru Crwp (Bw4n) Me CM/wamdn B.S, drarrmid Haver w R"6inar^d/r^^ (.wrdl Umamu}(/970)mdarM BA. arW Qr4MM iw FeNalJwn 44 Ha.wd 9rui~ar.Fhd(1977). Ne uw mrp/ged b}T he Fon Nalar/ Had JHaron aracaJmMrlm UBrrn m w arw o/<arununrwanr Imd~n~ and UnnatM bunulhwa- mil .5fr CMNHm pane 'lA .Sum nv, ,~ M. N bw(r IH Mdn [~,rrn,,,m,.mmn, cm,.p l!r rv Iti VnmMmQ lbnr. n/W n(Irl,\'HlC1 drmwlby lM hrm M1I• r:mll M1a h.n .r.br.. mr u/a nr,mM n/r~m~nmr m,m „nn(,rn,n rmtmL,u Armrmn ,dd., p,m,u r;,,l.,mnnn nnA 1(rm, n„~~,. n„rununnnm lL ,nlv. ,m rb , .., .,.,, „lld. 4nfnwrl 4.,., vHUm~ \.,~,,.~ N...,o... h,r.,unml Ymry,rwrr PROFF:SBIUN A I. STA F P RsAmd//. Chwdifl, fr Mdia Conununimliov Gmuy (Bobo) Mr ChwrhiHgndumfJmm fbrn mwW CW(rhr (197f), +wnmarum Lodr, uwhl aw A. B. dgm in Fio- nemrr mdfmnW N..m+d 8w.w+ .ohm/(/978)w/ha MawrofBwr~ w.AAdnuevbn Artrx. Aiorb joimy TA AlxiNU, Mr. chwredl uw uwwld un~A Cwp.r. t>! L76,md in nuuw auAl r°P°nrm wU J,nr Boron oJfrc. Nr u n Crr6~ jd Publr AUwn~r. M+ Church J( rmr+on Ju Bmrdef Arsbn o/ .Mawdu L'anmwudwu, /,u I'. Audmu+Mclo.u r lrarr,w. mlum Copm! (:.my (Herron) M. MdurcgudwW Jwm /Mn~ mount Cdh/e (/(M9) m~0 an A H h,/rnm Y)rhdap Nr ~a,Nrur~ ~.wn m Ju ltrcr (:wp., and Jun m.mian M H A MgeeJrmm Ju Amo+%irk 5'.hoM(197.1) Rwra N+^+nS 7A Munwu w /919, M. Mr/du um u /mdm.! Vu` Rnderu W Jr SYatr Sher Namk Cd Twt Gem pool in Bmmn Mr M~lav u Ru.~ MMO/rkN En(laM Vmmr L'ayud Araniawn mdua lh'mar of , Ax+,lrc,.cm~n,d/xbs7,rcm., . /rc , Emub CorpurNwn; Egmrox .ljmm+, Irc ; Fihnfom, l.u., Sienwmn Now, !,u , n,d'lik Vdm 5jumu, /rc ~~ ~3 frcqudirr C. Merby Vmwrn Cajn'td CmuP (Pdo Alro) Mrr. Mn.ggnma~(/ n.s~n/ad Uniunnry(1959)wiM a BarMbr ojAro M/m in P+XAn(^9.I md/ n Jr Sinmm Credwe Marpmiv 3hml(197A) unN r Mwm in Mo~ aFmnu .u+a+oawn k(dadninu. rmtw udmvkwypeiyuum . Nusbn AimaJl and Alum S+i,vrju. Mn. Mabl+omwrArBmrd+uf A'maneJa,wd, /rc.; DiSUd Rumd, Irc.; /n/ormation RYildm, ln.; Nw-RouGee(SpNV, lk.; Spinn.k. Sofrunm Corpowbn; wd Sp4m SoJluwrAusiva, Brc. J~7~ Qa~4w MraslA. Rumn WiG:mr. P. Galan r t'aam rp.rdG..A (Rle A4n) Mc fLende,6ndrrdJram Ha- mAUniome~(1976), rwr/mrde, wun a urnnor ojnru a6+^ in::w- rnrnrumdJ rh Credunk.khool~ Rwrw+al SanJonY Umm,N7 (/9.4R) mW n Mmb. of Aarwr Adminutw~ rwn dr6rrn, Aer bjmmrr6 TA A+om~ alu, kuar rmyio~Aj MmdiN Auawu, lrc., n riwn~mmrwn. ru4rrie/Srm, Mr. Cknndm u a /hnrnan L'uud+, !rc , :uuru~ Sfurn:q.inm„ ~ ....m TC'ln... Fru, nrd.YF.L!.mmmunuwbru, Irc Fwm mrAAdrninirrmeinn (~~) Mr. Rmrc~rodwkdJmm Ror•idrnrt (plG;e(19l/), mvfrnrumauG. wN gyn.,.,, 1n,.. ~.....,.,,.~... W.. J'o^' dr WAarbn.V'rhool aJ Fnerur (/9J.1), wrh Duurcamr, wMr b wv du Alkd (;kmuW !'OVVa(Inn Fdkw A/ur gmduauonkprru+l AMu. Y un` Cd Uomprnv inr~me m 0 3'mw Marn,{rrrunr (:mm~lurnt nrvl an Audit Marwer. m m Hmmn Mr Rwvtkn rnm. rr~ I I A++arau+b kad ck mr...o prc~m. ,.r..;.:rr nu:.abn ..... ~....,,, Porrrcr nJ IA A«nln4i lfalrr /{r a nl;nh/rM lfi4li.. L,•nmone i r r M.tio Gnrnwiraaon. Grwp (Ronan) Afr CaRob.,erndwdfrurn Hn.r,nd (lnrrn.nrv, rwn a+dr, wN a /krM /bor ro prune /'{Auaem, ,Nr Cnlbrn+ua nn.{rniam I1r. lhu Mr m rk Cogvimb /~nAmp Ihrmm~ n(rAr lnAmm~l VnunrW lMnl nr PnuaAnu. bum MPumr/nl MnA ,./M1,....r, m,e.,J io,nmr,m,ne,,,i, ImAinr. nn,l na ngnn,ilAr Im.Lerl ,Pn r n.. ~n•n .. P^ n. ~ rb ~ vA•, 7 5` Il nnm,m r urdr ln,~,en, I' ROFE tiSlO NA L 1'1'A Ff' Sleyhen F Can„4} Mdw CommeuimMnr Crvup (Bmlw) Me r mb}raienla Rodrbro/ Anr u lbfitid Sn'avfnm Beudeer Co~(1977)udo Munr JRwi. our AGninemwim Jnw Uu Cdumb'a Cmduw.4MW oJBwam (1978). /fur b pmiy TA Anawn, kurw rm pbr.d b} 71u Fvq N.tiorW !tent o/Bubo u o Ca/omre Lew pBirn. Mr Ca^n4}unu wa OimbeeJo name, /raapwe, ~rruiiryFd- nd Commwwlum Ca.Omumn, Mwr [ummunuuwn (:,,,pomaan; ur(NlamnW Coyomlwn Ra4.. w Rw} Vmlunr f p'uJ (%rouP (~~) M. 71Jjg.odaual,Fun Rra:cn L'ni- mriry(1973), n'°dna <wn faudr, and the HmmdBui~r.RFw((/97B) utih Dunrnw. Hruw wplgNu ar°'dinR~ ulbrCkurMmiMl- a Bmat wdndugwu/ju o Mw- ase.uBmiudCampn}, aRmbn 'LaleAr°^"'ll'nSfi^n. Fw lmp..r, Mr. Ral uar o Meer in Qs/}, //mrLaan and C,mepanj, afamu!- nuMlarwdmw;weenl aJouua. r OiWJrnuucl ra„~p,,,4,. mJ romiiyw TA Auaiun,kuwa (/aural l6.4ur o/ANn wd lam. pw} M.. LbrjuaQmbr JLa,n- Oua /tlmrrun Corfroronan; /fomr Diearurlbr, /ru., ~rodS}rune Corpawron; ad3irN!/ C°'^Oun s}nau tay,,,,lb,,. 7~ Gbmldf. Kmmn Yanev. imlae~ Cap W 1;nup (Ronan) M, e'ramn~„anaw,l,'mm,vm~n,w,~ nn Ilmw.wp(lYS'-0. uvN lhgkn Hover ro,N a lbrkbr o/,Lamr in Rwwu Admmunolran aM/rvm Aubn Umw+yr (19h5), unrh a Mule of Rwmere Admenuemlion dKm' /iw. b pinny TA Auoruur, k uu L'hu/6'mmrw ()ffun oJbm TApa.goln lwnyanu~, HmaA, .NYC' and Mrdwm, aW Cmup Vw lludmi aJ (:mJd, r.u Hr u o /Am -. r ._.,.... W~u~, 3rum, Carpnuw, flmrmh, /ru . l /' .5'harp.9umo ,, l,N, Mwermn (;m/mumn. ,ti~Mro, lra . ,1'y~nr~oM .bPoan.r r;mpowen oml t6ntmaa ,5yrmn~, /m MirAar/C. CA:b 1^as P4riMrl V.rw~r p:W C.wp (PobAlb) Mr. O4Jddwf~ldj""IdrUnin.- Nj of Cidfania r Qmir (/976) aibl a B.S. algra mdA H¢ke Haan m I EJnvim/Fnseaney. He r}na mue }aml u+lA lk Hmrlm-I4kd Cmm~ PonJv a Rodafan tylmrmN rkn rated Sa,y4nd Unianu} , .. -_ r..uu~ Ifior mjwvq~ TA, Mr CAlbw>, rmpbpib} rk Haan (:muWnK r;~~v, /a v n mwror /lonnlne rovuGma and y Hnly (inpmmmn m a /laded MnvKn Mr CklAu a /aramra/A.S/'krwnA, /v , OlI Crrjnrmon, IRImN lv , oral I blrnA lvm/nmmA 7~ ArNno /. Sgnl TA Arcnum Rmlt} (~~) Mr. Sgd lmomla BrMwrfAra Arsra, mn 4ud5 in Cemmanljrwn Hamd Co/Ige(/973A mdn Maw eJBvirarl AAminigMian adRhan Sari dUnimlu}(1915)uAnek wva Mdbn FAbu Rmr mjoiWq{ lA Auaiam, Mr, Sgd uva Vin lL...A~r:. 4......r R.rm.. Rwc.r. Iv., 0 6.Rrrammnridmdmmm nnnmym.ab,m mom Innmwl krAlner,n Ik.6n t'wmnmo, ra nne<m, w nlnpnn, u c' wAw HnranrMVrybmn vorkm Hrua v.mA+oJ ///./, NA /OPmdhv a rvl cram hm4r i hrmv apmrlw rn lfnuvbn.m jdm L. Bnoaa.Jr. Auava YmmeCupiru/Cmap (~~1 M~ Bannwiwl~BmkMnJArm Arpa4lWnAtialdRdN' nlJ~wn SlanJa d Uv'mti} (198JA w! s Mnm~enwv.A' ' de6nrfan bk Hmmd Bwra .Anal (IA4I). Riwajeini~ TA Acrnirn, kuw'n'Pl°}Mhl/ M...r.. n.A A.mri.nma /Ymmm~r of/drrwl RrrMr XWa Lab. M.. Rwnua fh'mmr aJCEMC pmn. Lion aM PTM /MwAin. 1' N (1 F F. ti ti l U N 4 1, S'I :\ P F HrianJ. fun } Ameivk Ym4ere Capita Crwp (Bmfon) h1r coneay renalaAarMar of Ar4 dr,Sre, mym ewn Rude, in F remvrand Ey(4h{mm Amknl Cdhg (/990), arch Marlno/Hun- nar Admmwm4m drsm/mm du Cmduak Shod al B1uinw of S/am /ord Uni,miry (1990. Rion bjaw~ ek TA Auaieo, Meeurhadm eAr Carpere fmaor and Mer`m aM Arquutiiov Depmlmmlr rJMmifl !}mh Capbl ManNr Croup, Mr. Cams )ua U'rebafAN~ln~ u0,gnu C.rJumebri Dubmdb Corpamlbn of Dderam; ardD f Imnu lmmmm 9pemu Corpumlba KaNenn S. CrvmeuQ Conko(kr (awbn) Mr Cranisdl meirda Harlulor eJ Ar4 wiN Ayhot duhMmn, Phi Hm Kappa, m f5f.hob0/mn' a4 Unr mrsiry f Vir6inb (19]7), arch Mar 4.o/Bru,mr AArn'ni.winJmm Jr Nmrmd Burimr Srhwl(1991), Rion bjoini,et TA A.radmn, u4 oar m- pbld bl Fgw'kmA, N. A. A the caaarnrr c~r~t nr p~aa~ aye h Coopers tlL}hrmdadaT A~ pmanm. SMua Grt~MWb / AtmmbN. Nabe'I EFNeyu Aaweiak Vmtun Copifd Crwp (Horton) Mc El~f/a{eamddwW/iwn Ya4 un;meti~ p99o), a.n hde, dh. Barhdwof$iekrdgmrw E4mww Eryimniwb md,mioedn Meem & Bwinar Admwirerfba fnw lM No ad $uuror Sdor! (1991) edm Ar mu• Bale Salrlu, Rw YJ'wimr( TA Auebb, Moro arrpbplbJ MrKwy C9Canrpaj, br. u. . munWNWueur £urra fuaxbrYW Hard Hurhoa Sdwl. fli4r OiroMrJ /nnrsvSPlaru, l,ee, ! ~a l,i„I NagRwrbs /AaadW ViaMCyiW Crw f (firma) Mr. ~er+~+1~~)G'~ UnimYf ada BaAdw r/Sea ~ mN5 DiMirlw w F..... fiyiaarvY (f975) ad ~ Malkr o/ 3C+rr k~rm El bird F~yi~ruy (/976). Ne weird.L1 MraeJ 8w~r AAv'niMn'ira d;~r fmm 0r Haremd Huriwr Srhd (/A9f). Asr bjniniK TA Anriam, kuw ~DMd h v4lfada~P~rhad Cwm P.m1 a+a Pvgn 6M~,wJw aom pm. Nrvn A'mmrojManenn (bpaWien. ,/tee wJr Aasiob Mda Gn+waaiweau ('rwp (drrn) Me WadradwWfmm+Ae Uvna- n9r~JNwrt LMr(197e~ +vmb aan Ludr, uAA ~ ., .. ~Bruiva Adninireelien in Fiwra, mdfrorn Ihr Hmord Bun'nw Sr6W (!9B?~ udS a Mumofflwi.nr AAnuima~ Finn dr;ra. Rbr bjainiiy TA A++m~ ala, Mue+anpbrdb7 eu Hmli+ Twtad SaarnA Ba'k In Grajn p m Ina+mnonal Mav7 Make A'ni~ .an aMdy CoLbnmi Sark. Ca (:om PA7 m .Nna~ Y h i~ ~a FircA/nm•v uni,bn I ,,,nrirrnl 7$ Liwea C. Wurrwti Yu M' CapiYf C+w y (errs) M+. WirvrH6rAddJ,wr lk Waomv Lti y Nar~irf Sdoo! v/ Nrany btiA Ham (!eN) odJran /r Smranu Grnduah Mmra`aimY .4Aoo(udA Ham(f98fA nAm+k nuiwto Manor M Mar6a++I Rinr b almdx'x; Svrarav, +k Mld ymiliav m bgr Idlu'ry MrpW+md a marlelry pmilion u /v Mdud Sprmu Aoi.wn n/Ur Ba+on ArMn~ ron Caryw~an Mr Wur,ew+M ram b 7A ham W vnlwemn~m/rvA+d~ mf oJtM NwA nJ Nrw En,~brd .SM1r a.a, a a lhrrar /AfMI Mdwl, fa P R O F E S S I O N n I. S T A F F ASR Rdj Lw4wIAr1~.t ~~ (FWAW) '~ KdfJfMwWJrsm Swrfay ANAgR USaW TAmpmds M.tlneJSwmr a hdurAiof Eng. nviy. /Ywr mwnyNins hu M.,S. Ar varMfw77v CAau MaManun BwA u Cu,p,mn Opwim. and SJrNV mdfm (:nnrvgnl 7kAmb~ go v an /MwireJ Fngr,er Twa9Wj • Fn~tArrfpl K.nv.gy/W Qwp (Qaar) Mt BB~jgsAuldfiw Y.Ir ui~ip9en)„:a ~ sed er y Ar4 drg~a Hinrp. Befm/rmAry. TA Arwrirc, Mr..AMj u..rMlJer .S4m Oma.Snovrsva Mmfern{ ErpmmWia mdJn Fmt Gmmad~ u) fmpnmion yBaaru a Smior A«owt Emww, e. xra,a truvannrf AnY~l YerM. GPiy((nwp (Byrgw) / Me NYd iviM. BrAiryAro ~, mn /eudr, w Emr.in j..r NmeadrW4l'r(1989), PYiw Yjow. ~y TA Ajnriefr; Mwy Fwrid Amlja of NeMegnmdAa/dd. Aau Dehmpmrf ywl,n, Rrd d Cw~µmq, /H, lirni yl AWA. IYdlle Frebrwtdw~ VwMGJud Crw~ (FLYdb) Mr. WAor9rW 7M Auwwaf~. n.u. G/y.(I9y7~ ao.r gedrdu /In~nr CNIar.EYd. rwA. RrAdw yeroA,gr.: Erwowiv NQwvwwt 79 REPR ESENTATIVE INV ESTMENTS ................. Carpaj ................ ... . . .. .......... QYr 6~ nJP6# TA /mataatl LLv Cmawvomu ... .... Adwm•AUrrH Co, Miaomor,gwprwwdCATVyru 197E HyfY6lt IETAarmmunrwimr Roiu,tr Wiltlw,, MA Coaad S~Mw,lne.' Mefwv lde. elerAr f% SLr1~ Mwl1w., AL1 DYa4am Cgmeuavlior, lor.' arYn 39E0 Ael~dwl Is.' -Iw~YjMmi wtJ.Y aw~warimr 19Nf /fyfYNe ~J HIM H/ q~ywre .Iae.' Arr4wr4'KpWa~ 1973 .Aw7w! M~.~ ,Ivu• F.be,p4rmarlmMVpo~6~ 197/ Riwne ~. YA NAw~,kwelw'gAer q77 q~{yly A~i~g MA , Mivaa~e Miauwwerweb, ~Pl°". IA7T A,w.r ~/a,• RoMnfwwlvs 1979 M)irNe WededN . lvc.• Almw/wereraea. gv(Arw! /%1 Agir64 Sdiw, CA Trkom'Il~mb~ka' AWrWit uRdigridYbn /9E7 Rear Sa DurS CA Td~nmd,la' Tdonwuwr~ea Pw,mwmnpdr4 19E5 /*1{yy s cnw e , n C. m p a~tn a AL1tl"00~ /~'M~`dwm /9G9 Pl~fiy4 %IIi~K Elrt ~ UnYlbammna gw~nat 19E5 RgfYNr .Swn7m4, %ELCommuniolwa',la.' Carol ~mdnuwnvprnia )9M AeEde4 .Iu~, fn NnwlRlYn4riev glvOncY •lMar,mmiw/amv711 A+riafe BmNo/A',aan'r, ~~ ................................................. ~u d Cwgrm ... ... HWNr, loc.' Tmpammy and OCR 1978 Rmar NOfiwAoarrtion Mmdaq NN Iwmooe Sywmr, loc.• fwV~^~l^ 3A93 RyfuNr lLmAws, !.A woe~neµa~io ~~~['~°37~f°P°~°° ' 'x°1oP'^o' 1995 6w/e/nM WJm.dl4, OR ~J~ S~xemy /ne.• CswpvN NmiiWradmerarwnpYmgnmu 198/ RyfWL tFid Bnt~CapMatm Miar~p~Mr quiver /979 Pb~fYly Varitmnie89n~.lne.• Rdrn Flmv, N EkOwirNYrblurrhiwmdmyp3rr /989 Deabpmrt VayaeCnip6s Irc. Mavau~rOm 1979 PIO~3e6/r Thwnod0.6, G Gpr.Safmm. ........ NYOdlw~9r dded.e3"q ~ 1980 DYn4prN M A 1/.I(~4w 5 ~ ,u p ~y~ AZ 81~/'+'Y~ 1988 PIryfYMr MsrrpnrmmJlmw 1981 MgfY94 1-:Jr(e..., G 8~31~°"C'^T~ Finruil0~l~ 1997 HyfYµ Auk TX o( A4 n6cnl4lv.rmrpmen 1987 Ayi1c14 ~ m ~ k M~ol(~nnlGmriJ r /99p Ao/YF6 NNMk MA Preormo Inc.• Cnp6'o wfrmme 1987 Rgb.Mr . &uNn, CO Swvu Mirn:onpromvdpwuiy ~ 1997 SIw3-uy Aeam, G So1MUe Aoraio, toc.• MaJ,mv ualiav mJnrmr 198.5 Avjlab4 Ner~n, YA Sorcim ion' MkrorornpWnrpmdJM mJlwor /931 Rofi6dG Smifmr, G gmm~vkerSMwue Corpantioo' MinvwM1aure ~8raeiuW mR~ 1.99? SYn-rV G mSoflwus Awoortn~Inc.' MmwJar4ooy 0/dimidulio9 roJ(uorr lA97 F1o/f1a64 _ ~6° ~M Snflru,IrK. Mam~gNOn w}.lia Guam i9BI _AeFCeb/r v m, 4A •Lbun~ rmonl mJormrTA Amxirm BaodelU'nda+'opmmratien. 8 / cnmpn y . ........... . ..pron .. ............ .. tip c>rseny..... . gffint TA /nwlrryryp Smim;darwr .. Adar Auociam,Inc! .._ __ __. . _- .GmvoMura. tr+t :q,npmev __. __.. _._ 1969 OtmlopnuM Ca.Soniwrbrfo. Fgvipnmt Hurtinglon, MA Acgia,Ix.• lno-ga4d mrrralcnonv nnwlpykagn 1981 Smbvp Nnu BefJe,d, MA BFU Engivmio8f tpontion• -~ -- .timvmdurbr/moY ryrmru 1981 LBO North BiBevq MA Datcl 57+r^., Inc.• -- Mi..r n...m ~r Mx w.ran:m 1.^71 flvJvadle Gmmn, MA ~Fmvfiuidio Gtpantion• AfoRratvJfwd dmva /979 Rmnae Nuhua, NN Micro Componert Tcdmology f<r~po~nv hvd(crJm renvaduM rnny 1988 AofvaA4 G. MW, MN Alive NcttvorYr Corporaion• Mum nnw4/n dory romvrvn /978 Smt-up Womom, MA yx~rc tynae:,n'- Q ~a ~- nvnmtrrw•wnwhr,~. 19ef B~r.~ p ~ sai~nsy.tt,n.,IM.. Aypr~a.p~w.swd.;n.m 19es B.oetr T tin, G pdpMuh .. .. .. .. Advmmd EleRronio Deign. Inc.• Dukm.wlb+a:tdwbc`mp5v.lmmire4 1980 Rofvab4 Sw ~,G AST Rsacech, Inc.• Mumwnp;WrmleravnrpoGs4 1983 nojra:tle /rorK„ G ihu 100 (,or~wrattan Mmvw~ka, AfN imnpwn u.miml ryrrnv 1977 Avfvadlr Dau Tadn;ology Corporation .. ~ U'tkomrm:br 198J Ro,/vakL _ c,.n., r~,m G Data 7ruulnion,IM, ~~- ~ -- -~-- l.~--uquuvron kmdr a.d rynmu 199/ Flefirebk ,lfnrlEmo, MA DaumNiaf ryonGon of D<l a.v.rt' Cmmpwn u.rmoo4 1977 LBO ltnvaukm, Nf Uclia Uau Snkm. G.riwetinn' r,ompwn iermiwL ... _-_-~-.,~ 1981 Ao/voD4 %man, I'A (lii Tecl;noLrgY' l:,l moerup:mv.; .~.. _ ..-_-- 1991 fhfibbe 5'un y:a4, QA t:muleZ ('nrPomir~o• 11a:~:a.ogrnMrommwvawm m+rmBm 1980 fWJvad4 fwm Mrm, (_1 QMR, InaI Ihn:r mmniL.: erNLUO pnnin rri~ 1981 ~IbkfaBG Afnb:4, A/. kiro;i5c Jf iam Sonnn.. Lu ' :. a.~~. ~:Pn-gym _ _ 1997 -_..'1oJ~rob4 tlnunmm 1':nr, t.1 .Sigmumn Nwa, to-.' ll.,In:lo.n::vmml /lol pooc(dupkrr 1985 Smhuf i hawaM 0..; (:! '6ndon Gnpo:ation• rn,A ,n::.: .. ._- 1Y77 - - flnrfopr~n r'r„rnrmm, rq 'lMmu: n:..mn.r P+~~~~ll I..,e, ro.:., •r lr~.d,~. ,ry,n:mmnnn 8 ~_ campaq .... ...d.~,:p~,n -a;,trsroa: ofFinf TA lmtfnunl~ fbmymr.nrrzn CMI Ga9oranon f OWn annbvM dml adbdn rnan n.a.u. C um~~Naha4vm Cupokiav' C°npw^vdd°I°A°"/mM'ol^°^ed~'N 1981 -mdopmat S f ~ CorponNon' Car~pWrr limvhmi^d /97Y AofiWb4 I.P. ShupA~iatt•LW.• Tmaw, ~a~od. Comywn remm md,r~wmrymdurb 1981 AvIfm84 STSCr Inc.' Cmnpwa I^nnd^N 19N P WN. Aekda, M- r SoRad Comport Pmdum~Inc.• SoJfumrdilbibJm 1987 Ro/ilob4 /nglmoed, G1 lvrmmmmeoa. lhxnl Cavml BBFCrwrp la.' ' E/afmvu pmlwn 19]7 L80 1 armrv Awmmnon ,a (,.4E WaBAmM MA ~~ ~m'oll+m 19N Ro~4ablr C6M Mewwmdnu warenanl ~ Jr~ M~xble !~'mrT ' NC Dayuooc latrnmeat SYw~CorP• LWa rcgouYim eulwmrfr .-__ 1980 LBO Mimwdng ON F AD, Ioc.' C 1n4TWdavaw doYn.aJluma 198} PmrfxNe I- C~ ~ C ~V~ fRmal SYar®aComp•nY• SMmon4°'°roY°89uoWlaumwa 1959 lk;6ra84 PJ4fuld, M A aorc C a.po~m Cor4Mdm•CA {1od'moneb4.o^adb+ 1AA3 Smo-"P C°rP°^do°• -a6'm1O"°a'an0ollm 1969 Smf-'W Prrxuiov Bnbou~[vc.• Smell mla grwv 1981 Bannn WaDum• MA Rclrorin~Ioc~ hdwnwl v:wmun mar8nv7 1981 I.BO Ndlq NY Snbtm,Inc.' Flulmarr molun wnne( /985 ,Smaup Ammno-, MA SHn`Dt'6o.loc' (:orMwn melddnK^ 1987 Rmmue ^R1^"o8 CO Spabvmbin, loc. !'lama rniuba rGm^°'^•n'I 1977 MJ/aLJr Arxbwc MA Wa t:r Conv>bC .punrian :'aluu wAWmaw:wars 1973 AvfiioGe- BuIIkILwn.Id1 ~•.n.ln~ ( n... (anbn8~ ~ i ~n~rwY.uFrw a.v~.a ..... rrin .~mf'up ~dllWyoc, Im.• .... - McGul mmumMUie~_~~.. -._ - 1.98/ - ___~~(~_ _ mNfq Hums DiaaneNin, Inc.' _ ..... .^Abd plwaer monwngl rywpmenl..--_ .-/9R1 ~ -- 'I?mav ,vmnl mJmmn7:1 Aurcwm ik.,,doJU vnn-;'rprzuniatron ~3 .................................................. cmnpmy O..nMbn tb~ wston H ,.• .. H r'W Grove olAmetiu,Im' hwm hn ,W mo - .- 0 Pint TA /me+:m.nrJ od~p ~ 0 ^°M^r^f ~~-'~-~- J9flJ IAO Cd 9iomaivd (rvnNruel) WWr'iylen, fJL Immurwfeu, Ine.' Mmu/nm(unbed3 drug k7~u+)rnfmu .._____.. _19fl1 9are~up Boron, MA M~6'a Ccamm,iroeiom .. ... . McdM,Irc. Mdiddm;m _. !9tl0 Rab:ob4 FlhrdugM1, PA MMI Mrdiel,Irc.' MadJ'e dvgar(ir inngry mvva -_-_ ....-- 1983 .",ah/oblr ltrno^o, CA No-Md.Im' NvpW._T .r..: ~-._. __ ._ lvrc.t Av6/aN` Emrro, CA Qualiote, La.• NwpBdnmvgmmt ___ __ I9B/ LBO N G.Wm, U -- - Simriae Madiol, lne.' IAvn61e mdvdpurPmmt mw I ium . l9BJ LBO Tnrmrr, CA --- -- Uvivend Hadth Savice,Irc. Norp'm/nmuRemenr - 19]9 LBO Bald Cfvuf{ PA Viuamn, N.V.' Matim/qupmnl 1973 Aofmbtr >l7not, 73tNdMlmrdr ~CJbyrtevu Cwporatlw• Cadlr [Am'mnopnmm 1983 LBO ~ Amnion Md'u Radiaaaenr gxmw /981 LBO ~WrAopu, NY CoouomW Cabkviabn, lvc.• Oab4 ulmimi°P'1°'w 1970 Rmnu Boron, MA Federd Uao.mw:ratloo Co.pn.tinn• Red~oamen epervlm 1981 LBO /looidrnor, Rl . ISeyrn.rtet Commuoiorboa lrc. Radionotion °PnnrO1 1981 LBO Jarkun, MS --- - Maude Commnniolww, loc. ^ „ k/muunopr,WOr 1981 LBO Bumvyhmn, Al -~~- '- Mau Cnmmmiotiom,frc.• OwdmrndmlLUS 1985 f.B0 !.oriNh, MS --____. _ _ _,- - Omni 7a~Aoologiu,Irc. - ~'K~yor _ roe; -B0 - LPm, MA Put City Commuoioriom,lw BnGorw;en opmwr ___.. ____.. ._ __ I9IA . _._.LBO Brd,{jw1 LT Smneix Gmv Btoadurtiv,lrc. P F Radom rm:~on -"__._..__-...-. oM^ro' ...._-____- 198] .__... ..._ I.Ib~ tamnu NN Simrrwru Communicatiom,lnc. ~~ - tALJ(kkonian °D'"vo' ~- 1985 LHO ~-- tamF Hm A, CA b/dunukn, W' •IMNr, rurm,i nr (,m,v, 1A Ara,.w, Ikn,do/lh,r+en' •ym,mra:ron SJL. Jnc. 7i(muran C,oadrom /98l l.lf(J HiU,nRr, MT .Sunru~-UW,Inc. .--Hadn bwdr m. _..__. ._- 1A91 I.AO .iat lato CW, I/T Wiemvin CaWelnmiun, l.irl.' (,~~~____. _.__ _..__ _.__ _ op~ 19NS /,p0 ~~ ................................................. CornQa r Dramption Ova (J Slade Mirrellmww Manufafwind . ... . f{OBrr 1970 BOptin Cmto Coryontion' Meb/oplm I97I .Vwf-qe Dei6upall,lx.' •SMraUJP~annd 1959 Ao/neb4 Marlboro, MA Eaatav MwnYia Spow,lrc• Mobvainanrymdrermana(ryvipmv 1970 AgVaBI< .w.nl+bad; nN ~Exprvo Corpma[ioo TT NN Smoupvkyrpnarrry an°Pml 1977 Sbdp iW.Iu.• Gw7ferd M 7aA4 mnN/O'rl'n• JA59 Ro)fbb/e Cmrubom, NC Hue,Ey Cnryorr[ioa OJ arll uraim 1979 AeJuab4 ii N tiaWm Laivg Scebm,Irc. Conloimrlou^ry I97B Efe/FoEL San Frm~iao, CA Ner EoAl.vd Bu®a8wim,Inc.' Sp¢iol4~lw^" 1970 Ae)irW ~~ T MA PI'M lvdrWim Corporatioo• Acirion rrw8ur /ioP I9B0 LAO WealJreW, MA r ° Pipe r~Lm~y Mndm City, L~ OJpprrimpnion rauvn 1981 Swl-vp home Gawp,Irc. Wirtmdrab4mmw/amrn :979 LAO Rums NY TaybrAmW Cmpm+tion• NarrLraedueibuebn and laol mua/unml I97/ PIOPbEG SpnnQield, MA Wataa T<rLmbgy,Irc.• SuMv.nbG ailail ar<BAw^P' 1980 Reanv .SMa+na, OK 'Oawlu lurnm mJormn TA Auawc Am.Ao/Iamwl'~rpumbtlan ^) F F I N I'1' I O N S rdSugo o(Cnmp+nvu Dar<o(Fim 9)\Inwnmcm Smrup (Slagr/~. . . . . . .. . A'u Amfwt rernw, and Lyle o.roopmre hubry .. _.__ Lkurtopmmt(Skyx//r. ~n Amewt rrc.nwl aMaAubry a(Anr(oprranl rijrnvr Ane-•_°="v: //'1 ' rmim mmwl bw mi erumm~o ..- ---_. RnJibb4 (.)LV./i) (kdwl Menw),Ara/~bGeann mnnN~b~m.nN Aaru uml rx/.r Mto mmrn Am/,bA4 LflO Nnrm.+.1 .wwr• AvrwblaM/Aunmu AurtMrN mlN drd al nrll ar nlnrlrFmmin~ V ENCLOSURE 4 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ° SCOTT CABLE COMMUNICAT IONS INC. ° SIMMONS COMMUNICATIONS OF DELAWARE- MARYLAND~ NEW YORK AND VERMONT ° SIMMONS COMMUNZCAT IONS OF LONG BEACH, INC. ~~ SCOTT' GAELS COMMDNIGTIONS, INC. PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET (In thousands) Scott Cable Communications, Inc. As Reported at March 31. 1987 Adiustments Assets Cash end Short Term Investments Accounts Receivable-Net Other Assets Property, Plant and Equipment-At Cost Accumulated Depreciation Excess Cost Over Tangible Assets-Net Debt Issuance Costs Total Assets 5 4,447 477 3,287 61,569 (11,584) 42,138 $100,334 $ -- (151)(d) 40,015 (b) 11,584 (b) 39,192 (b) 1,75 (e) $ 92,365 Liabilities and Capital Subordinated Debentures Revolving Bank Credit Construction Term Loan Installment Obligations Obligations Under Capi tall Leaaea Reducing Revolving Credit Facility Zero Coupon Senior Secured Notes Zero Coupon Senior Subordinated Notes Junior Subordinated Debentures Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Expenses Subscriber Prepayments and Deposits Deferred Federal Income Ta%PG Capital: Preferred Stock Common Stock Retained Earnings New Equity $ 50,000 14,804 2,394 772 611 5,137 Ssl a, "+98 3,011 9,503 4,123 5100,334 Pro Forma Combined 5 4,447 477 3,136 101,584 81,330 1,725 5192,699 $ -- $ 50,000 (14,884)(d) -- -- 2,394 (416)(c) 356 -- 611 eo,zso (a) Bo,2sa 22,900 (a) 22,900 8,000 (e) 9,000 18,000 (a) 18,000 -- 5,137 -- 551 (3,01])Ic) (9,503)(c) (4,1231.') 4,500 (a) $ 92,365 4,500 $192,699 See notes to pro forma balance sheet. 8 6COTT CAELE COMMONICATIONS, INC. NOTES TO PRO PORMA BALANCE SEEHT The Pro Forma Salence Sheet gives effect to the acquisition of Scott by Merger Corp. as if the acgvisi lion occurred on March 31, 198). The Pro Forma adjustments give effect to the following: (a) Issuance of new debt to finance the acquisition of Scott end contributions to capital by shareholders of Merger Corp. (b) Acquisition of Scott and preliminary allocation of the fair value of the net assets acquired based upon the purchase price. Assessments of fair value are subject to final determination based upon final appraisal of the fair market value of the net assets acquired at the closing date. (c) Elimination of assets not acquired, liabilities not assumed, and original capital of Scott. (d) Prepayment of existing debt and elimination of related unamortized deferred issuance costs. (e) Copt associated with the issuance of new debt. ~g OPINION OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the General Partners of Simmons Communications of Delaware-Maryland, New Yock and Vermont: We have examined the combined balance sheets of Simmons Communications of Delaware-Marylnnd, Simmons Communications of New York and Simmons Communications of Vermont (the •Partnershipa•) as of December 31, 1986 and 1985 and the related combined statements of operations, changes in capital and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1986. Our examinations were made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and, eccocdingly, included such testa of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, such combined financial statements present [airly the iinanciai puui~iuu ui iiie i•actnecanipa ac December 31, 1986 and 1985 and the results of their combined operations, changes in combined capi[al and the changes in their combined financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1986, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. DELOITTE BASRINS i SELLS Stamford, Connecticut March 6, 1987 g9 _z SIPHONS COFRNIi1CATI0N5 OF DELAWARE-MARYLAND, NEW YORK AND VERMONT N07ES ASSETS Investment in cable television systems: Reception and dictribution facilities and equipment Lacs accumulated depreciation Reception and dictribution facilities and equipment - net Franchise costs - net Covenant not to compete - net Investment in cable television cystems -net Goodwill - net Note receivable Due from affiliates Accounts receivable - subscribers Deferred charges = net Cash Prepaid and other assets 1,2 =20,804,010 ;23,207, 4.257.786 6.542, 16,546,224 16,684,77 1 9,743,71 8,737,05 1 1,013,878 9D0 S 27,303,693 26,302,37 1 1.279,519 1,231,9 i1 306,707 291,89 132,97 219.270 156,0E 1 216,305 152,5.: 597.027 339,Of 281,829 455.35 TOTAL =30,204.550 624,064,2E LUHILITIES AND CAPITAL Linbilitles• Notes payable Accounts payable and accrued expenses Prepaid service income Converter deposits Due to affiliates Other liabilities 2 625,167,868 626,598,81 1,315,521 1,206,3( 293,429 283,2: 411,969 440,Bi 3 609,834 53.089 39.21 Total liabilities Capital TOTAL See Notes to Combined Financial Siatementc. 27,851,710 28,568,4'. 1 2.352.840 495 J; 630,204,550 629,064,21 9d Y T 7 O Qy Z O .t N P ~'1 C m~ N ~t ~o N m O O .O P N P P 1~ N N T ~ m m O . i J P O i'f T M N N m N N N H J P N m ~"~ N A N P ~} M1 N ~O ~C J N q O N P ~ T ~1 ~ O I~ J O N m T P 17 /9 1'1 N N M ~ J' m ~ N d N d N P ~O > ~C J fC `O ¢ O N N O T ~O ~ ~ N 7 ^ ^ N I N N J P !~ .y I1 Mf 2 N m N T NI NI T N X11 a1 .+ ~} N d 7 y Y C ~ N ^ g W M ~ 0 0 L ~ ~ y ~~N a a ~ a aee :rr h V ~ S d y y Y ~~b~aaa~as ~ ~~ Q Y Y N M Y Y COlISINED STATEHENTS OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL Capltal, January I, 1984 X5,983,491 Capltal contrlbutlons 1,800 OOD Net 1066 for the year ended December 31, 1984 _ (3,176.202) Capital, December 31, 1984 4 007 289 , , Capltal contriD~tlons 725 000 Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1985 (2.379.449) Capital, December 31, 1985 2,352,840 i Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1986 (1,657.066)I,, Capital, December 31, 1986 = 495.772 See Notes to Combined Finenclel Statements. F- ~~ m m m ono o m FP d N P n n d m d On N N I N d OP d N J m O N rvm•Y V Ny .~N P Nn d P O O I ~ ~ I n I ~ ~ ~ n n P N m n ~dn n I O P.p n Or P N P n P I n d d d n N l N n N n H ~~ I l H ~I N N P .Wn O OPn .O V) N O N nP~GOn O n d o do J P O P nN.p OHO 4 m m d N d ~G dJ m nNN dJ 1 P O1 P1 NY)NOd O nJ d N O P y„1 P on ~ el Pl m n n1 mnnoN n I l O m~ n n Y, nnN I I m N~ OmNnd O PI rv n y M n I I I I I .w I N~ w ti I N ~ m I, nI ~O .O n~ b~ ~~ m ~~ d~ Pmd S N I n~ N ~~ ~~I M N• I I I I I N W) O) NN '+ N I m C O v~ O • • O M M • ~ Y YY YY Y W Y M M C • O M Y a ~c 9 T p i w ~ O .+ Y • M Y OC 6 O u N O u Y uc M i9 V1 m y i y y Y y ~ Y C • / 9 u {' ~ Y (O .( /~ WC uYY (i Y r Y Y ] Y T CY Y O \ T yyj y fY • YH N p~ Y W ~ J 9Y Y ~ CyC O ~ Y Y^ ~ y y V M M Y Y u O] YY: y Y V JT cW <a •O ~^ Y m L• 9 YOB Y.Y Y W C i• GY My Y~ Rt 9 L U 0 {9~t~L M LY~Y 6 a 9 V ~ 9 ~ • Y M m M Y p9 ) C • T•u p^M .-.a n 9•.1 V T W ••~ V6• 9uR Y]WY p q i ~ VY Y/ YY •Y Yy mu ~ yO~ Y. y`y W~ U 2]{ 41p UO y ~ ~ y T Y O FY6M ft 6 dYYC {~~uM 2 OY C G Y C C V O COY .w SYL• Y~C < Z ~ ~ S ~ yJ LI ~ •. Y Y W O M yY O.Oy9 Yl ti ^ P F~ 4~~Y MY •V9 ~ • ~Y YC W Y Y• f.0• ^ U O O O Y <CY OYYY O GW M Y~.4YY Cif E IMY~~ Y YY{~ T Z M S Y O N y ? y C ~ tl VV~~ ~ {J YI v Yl Y • Y T W O m C w C +1 E Y Y T W O Y y y yYY CCC~ GS C22 U r+ Y F •MY ]YG CY pO U A YY H JM ~~ M ~ V 6Y ~iY:M1 .1 ~ y Fy Py~~iO~W pY i`~OO~~ O ZM U ~ ~ M ~' 2 ~~ SIMMONS C0f01UNICATIONS OF DELAWARE-1fARYLAND, NEW YORE AND VERM017T NOTES 70 COl18INED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SWlMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES OiRenlzetlon 7'he accompanying combined financial ctatemenis include the accounts of the following (the "Partnerships"): Simmons Communications of Delaware-Maryland Simmons Communications of New York Simmons Communications of Vermont All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Partnerships were formed to acquire, own, maintain end operate cable televlslon ("CATV") systems. The General Partners of Simmons Communications of Delaware-Maryland are 5lmmons Communications of Delaware-Maryland Inc. and All-Venture Communications of Delaware-Haryiand, Inc. The General Partners of Simmons Communications of New York are Simmons Communications of New York, Inc. and All-Venture Communications of New York, Inc. The General Partners of Simmons Communications of Vermont ere Simmons Communications of Vermont, Inc. end All-Venture Communications of Vermont, Inc. With the excepption of All-Venture Communlceiions of Delnware-Harylend, Inc., each of the Genetal Partners have common ownership. A minority owner of All-Venture Communications of Delaware-Harylend, Inc. has a 9 percent interest 1n Simmons Communications of Delaware-Harylend. Its share of the loss of the Fartnership for the years ended December 31, 1964, 1985 end 1966 was :171,066, 5147,257 and 5130,067, respeetively, and of capital for years ended December 31, 1984, 1985 and 1986 was 5171,095, 523,838 and 5(106,229), respectively. On November 3, 1986, Simmons Communications Company, L.P., entered into a purchase agreement to acquire all the issued and outstanding stock of the Genernl Partners of the Fart.^.zrs*.ips. tcllouing the ccnsumWatfar. of the purchase an December 31, 1986, the encicies acquired will be dissolved, resulting Sn the direct ownership of the cable systems by Simmons Communications Company, L.P. The 1986 finenciel statements present finenciel position and results immediately prior to the purchase. Acaufcltlons The Fartnezehipc •equired •dditiona] c Items on February 8, 1964, Narch 23, 1984 end October 16 1985. 7'he purchece price of theca eyctems totalled SB,296,b00, The ecquleitionc were •ecounted for acing the purchece method of accounting and, •ccozdingly, the operating reeultc of theca cyctems •re included !n the combined etatementc of operations eubsequenc to the date of their •cqufsltion. Following are unaudited pro forme combined results of operations on the purchase method of accounting basis for the yeerc ended December 31, 1984 and 1985, assuming that the ecquicitlons had occurred on January 1, 1984. The December 31, 1485 results of operations ere alto prepared on a pro forma beats to reflect the October 16, 1985 acquisition as !f it had occurred on January 1, 1985. The results ate not nececcerily indicative of whet would have occurred had the eequieitfon Deen conaummeted es of Jenuery 1, 1984 or January 1, 1965, or of [he future operations of the combined systems. Year Ended December 31 Revenues ;6,890,088 =10,064,630 Operating Income (Loss) {383,351) 349,015 Net Loss 3,297,987 2,314,597 Investment In Cable Television Systems The purchase price of system ecquicitlons has been allocated to reception end distribution facilities and equipment, s....~~f~e ....~._ ....,.a...,, --d - . e--"'~~~ .... .. Circuau~ uuL CO COmpeLe Dased 00 their respective fair values at date of acquisition. Reception and distribution facilities and equipment additions are stated e[ cost. Depreciation Ss provided using the straight-line method over Che estimated useful lives of the assets (three to thirty years). Franchise costs for franchises with fixed terms ere amortized over the remaining terms of the franchises. Accumulated amortisation of franchise costs aggregated ¢1,344,693, ¢2,290,612 and ¢3,297,339 et December 31, 1984, 1985 and 1986 i respectively. ~, Goodwill is amortized over 40 years. Accumulated amortization i of goeds~ill aggregated ¢32.308, ¢58,675 end 593,333 et i December 31, 1964, 1965 end 1986, respectively. Covenants not to compete ere amortized over the life of the I agreements (ten end fifteen years). Accumulated amortization of such covenants aggregated 563,333, 5186,122 end 5299,451 et December 31, 1984, 1985 and 1966, respectively. lncome Taxes No providion fiat been msde for Federal of state income taxes as taxable income or loccec •c well •s invectment tax credits of the Partnerchipc are allocated to the General Pertnerc to be included in their lncome tax returns. Deferred Cherxes Deferred charges consist of organisational costs and loan •cquisltion costs. Organitetionel costs are amortized over five years and loan acquisition costs are amortized over [he life of the related debt. 2. NOTES PAYABLE At Deceaber 31, 1965 and 1966 outstanding long-term debt consisted of the following: December 31 Bank loans - Revolving =14,110,827 x13,884,000 Bank loans - Term 6,675,000 8,566,667 Seller's notes 4,182,041 4,148,145 Total x25,]67,866 x26,599,812 Bank Loans Simmons Communications of Vermont hod an revolvinx and term luau a icc,uc At wit.`. .`.o ri: i.. -~` 'IDGu rat vi ~• g 3 . ra,7 °u,vvv. iue agreement provides for interest at the rate of .75 percentage point over the bank's prime rate which may be reduced under certain circumstances. The effective rate at December 31, 1966 vas 8.252. Simmons Communications of Delaware-Haryland had an agreement with a bank providing for total borrowings of x14,500,000 under a revolving credit facllity through December 31, 1966, convertible et that time to a term loan requiring increasing quarterly payments of principal through Herch 31, 1993. The agreement provides for interest •t the rate of .75 percentage point over [he bank's prime rate which may be reduced under certain circumstances. The effective rate at December 31, 1986 was 6.251. Also, the Partnership had entered irate an agreement on January 19, 1965, whereby the Interest on x10,000,000 of debt was fixed at 12.751 until December 31, 1986. A fee of .51 was payable to the bank on the unused portion of the facllity. ~~ with a Denh pT OVio inb au~ wina vuu yn u~po v. ~~,>,~,~~~,~, ~u a reement provides for interact •t 1.25 percentage point over the bank's prime rate which may be reduced under certain eircumctencec. The effective rate •t December !l, 1986 and vac 8.251. Quarterly prlneipe] psyments commenced on June 3C 1986. The revolving end term loans •re collatcraliced by cubstanifally •lI the •csets of the zecpectlve Partnerships. 7'he agreements contain covenants requiring maintenance of minimum subscriber levels end cash floe and contain rectrictfonc on the use of working capital •nd future indebtednecc. Sellers' Notes In connection with the ecquisltions of certain CATV systems, the Partnerships issued notes io former owners. Notes ^ggregeting 62,646,145 and =1,502,000 beer intezest'at 91 any 127., respectively, and are due in various lnctelments througl 1994. The notes are subordinated to the bank loans and •re secured by letters of credit totalling 53,752,000 at December 31, 1986. In connection with the acquisition of the Partnership by Simmons Communications Company, L.P., the Dank loans end seller's notes were retired on December 31, 1986 with procee from the sale. 3.' TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES Cimmnns Communications, Inc. ("SCI") has agreements with the Partnerships, with which it is atf llinteo, to act as manager of [heir operations end is reimbursed for •11 expenses incurred •s such. Reimbursed expenses under these agreement for the years ended December 31, 1984, 1985 end 1986 were approximately 6400,000, 6498,000 and 6502,000. SCI is paid menegemenC fees equal to 31 of gross operating revenues of the individual Partnerships. These fees ere increased to S1 of gross operating revenues of the individue Partnerships in each year the cash floe of such Par[nerchlpe es defined in the partnership agreements, exceeds the operating cash fiow of the systems for the fieesl year immediately preceeding the acquisition of the systems. Hanegement fees for the years ended December 31 1984, 1985 end 1956 aggregated approximstfly, 6401,000, 643,000 and 6546,000 respectively. 9~ In Auguct 7985, SSmmons Communlcntlons of Ucle~~nre-yury)and sold one of !tc cable televlclon systemc foz =402 463. The cyctem had served •yproximately 375 out of • tot•i of 27,000 cubscribezc served by the 1'•rtnerchip. 7'he gain on the tale vac j150,4]7. RENTAL COHNITNENTS The partnerchips rent pole cpace, office space and equipment under operating leases. Rent expense for the yeerc ended December 31 1984, 1985 ^nd 1986 vas •pproximetely ;153,ODD, j218,00D an~ j251,000 respectively. ! `" UL'IU-11U ' Haskins+Seils 1600 Summer Street Slsmlord. Connenicu1080055121 (20313511800 ITT Talex: 1005633 AUDITORS' OPINION Simmons Communications of Long Heach, Inc.: we have examined the consolidated balance sheets of Simmons Communications of Long Beech, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31. 1986 end 1985 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficiency) and changes !n financial position for the year ended December 31, 1986 and the period from April 26, 1985 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 1965. Our examinations were made !n accordance with generally accepted auditing standards end, accordingly, included such testa of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered n pcnw in h6a nl~rumeronnov In our opinion, each consolidated financial statements present fairly the financial position of Simmons Communications of Long Beach, Inc. and subsidiaries et December 31, 1986 and 1985 and the results of their operations and the changes in their financial position for the periods then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. March 6, 1987 95' SIMMONS COMDRINICATIONS OF LONG REACH, TNC.AND SUBSIDIARIES ASSETS INVESTMENT IN CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS: Reception and distribution facilities and equipment ......................... Less accumulated depreciation........... Reception and distribution facilities and equipment - net ................... Franchise costs - net ................... Covenant not to compete - net........... Investment in cable television systems - net . ............................... GOODWILL ................................ DEFERRED CHARGES ........................ CASH .................................... ACCOUIJTS RECEIVABLE - Subscribers....... PREPAID AND OTHER ....................... TOTAL ........ ........................... LIABILITIES AND S EHOLDERS EQDITY (DEFICIENCY) NOTES 1986 1985 1 633,337,756 626,956,261 (3,514,376) (424,747 29,823,380 26,531,514' 1 11,415,713 12,574,248 920,000 1,000.000 42,159,093 1 2,359,950 1 690,672 190,909 1,156,534 40,105,762 2,738,1151 544,487] 922,0771 902,020 493,510 652,480 647,050,666 45 864,941 LIABILITIES: Notes and loans payable ................. Accounts payables and accrued expenses.. Deferred revenue ........................ Due to offillate ........................ Total liabilities ....................... SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY): Class A Common Stock, 400 shares issued end outstending ..................... Class B Common Stock, 600 shares issued and ouCstsndingg. .... Additional paid-ir. capital .............. Deficit ................................. Total shareholders equity (deficiency) TOTAL ................................... 3 45,250,000 641,000,000 4,413,401 2,418,975 1 1,426,329 499,756 206.994 86.941 51,296,724 44,005,672 40 40 60 60 3,000,000 3,000,000 (7,246,156) (1,140,631, 14,246,056) 1,859,269 647,05(,668 645,864,941 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. / -_- SIHM01iS COlDR1NICATIONS OF LONC BEACH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOP, THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1986 AND THE PER10D FROM APRIL 26, 1985 (DATE OF INCORPORATION) TO DECEMBER 31, 1985 NOTES 1986 1985 I SUBSCRIPTION REVENUE......... ~.~ :?~~.... 1 513,113,932 (2,077,201 INTEREST REVENUE ......................... 3,472 4,200' OTHER REVENUE ............................ 966,412 16,278 TOTAL REVENIIE ..................~.~:~ ~V.. 14,083,816 2,047,679 COSTS AND EXPENSES - Direct Operating, General and Administrative, ands S~Q Marketing ....................,-.-.t....... OPERATING INCOME BEFORE MANAGEMEN'F~FEES, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION ..................... Si~~y MANAGEMENT FESS .....................~ ~~ S dGu INTEREST EXPENSE .......... .........:..... 3 DU U DEPRECIATION AND pMOP,TIZATIOti. .... ./. ..... NET LOSS ......................... ~~'./.~ :~. 7 10,314,162 1,654.596 3,769,654 443,083 4 562,568 83,863 4,794,858 860,717 1 4,517.553 639.334 5 6,105,325 51,140,831 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. ! ~/ - 3 - SIMMONS COMMUNICATIONS OF LONC REACH. INC. AND SUBBIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1986 AND THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 26, 1985 (DATE nr iwirnrrnnemi nU\ mn Tr(`rNArr 91 lORS COMlfON STOCK * TOTAL ADDITIONAL SHAREHOLDERS' OF SHARES PAID-IN EQUITY AUTHORIZED PAR VALUE CAPITAL DEFICIT (DEFICIENCY) STOCK ISSUED 1,000 6100 $3,000,000 ~ 3,000,100 NET LOSS.... 5(1,140,831) (1,140,531) BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1985...... 1,000 100 3,000,000 (1,140,831) 1,859,269 NET LOSS.... (6,105,325) (6,105,325) BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1986...... .1,000 X100 ___x,000,000 * Consists of 400 Class A shares et 5.10 par shares et 5.10 par value. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (v~ -4" SIHMONS COMMUNICATIONS OF LONG BEACH INC, AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANCES IN FINANCIAL POSITION FOP. THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1986 AND THE PERIOD FROM APAIL 26, 1985 LATE OF INCORPORATION) TO DECEMBER 31 1985 NOTES EXTERNAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from issuance of common stock... Issuance of notes and loans payable...... Total funds from external sources........ FUNDS USED FOR ItiVESTML'NT IN: Acquisition of cable television systems (excluding acquired corking capital of $27,954): 1 Reception and distribution facilities and equipment ........................ Franchise costs ........................ Covenant not to compete ................ Goodwill ............................... 1 Additions to reception and distribution facilities er4d equipment ............... Total funds invested ..................... FUNDS FROM INTERNAL SOURCES: Realized from (used for) current oDere[ione: Net loss ............................... Depreciation .................. Amortization........ ~~~~~~~~~ Total funds used for current operations.. Realized from (used for) corking capital items: Accounts payable end accrued expenses.. Deferred charges ............... ........ Accounts receivable .................... Prepaid and other ............. Deferred revenue ....................... Due to affiliate ....................... 1986 54,250,000 4,250,000 (316,928) 6,381,495 6,064,567 (6,105,325) 3,089,629 11, 4~1''387;7Tf) 1,994,426 (274,337) (214,514) 158,970 926,573 _ 120,053 Total funds from ante rnel sources.,, ,___, 1,083,399 Increase (Decrease) in Cesh .............. (731,168) CASH, beginning of period ................ 97.2,077 CASH, end of year........ S 190.909 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. ( ~ j 1985 $ 3,000,OOq 41,000,00(' 44,000,00( 26,413,48° 12,740,00[ 1,000,00( 2,767,44' 542,777 43,463,70( (1,140,837 424,74; 214 58; ~~~ 2,419,07: (563,99: (902,021 (652,48 499,75 86,94 385 78 922,07' 2 0 5 SIMHONS CONMl7NICATIONS OF LONG BEACH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUHMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Simmons Communications of Long Beech, Inc. (the "Company"), Long Beach/Signal Hill Cable Communications Company (a wholly owned subsidiary), Long Beach Cable, Inc. (e wholly owned subsidiary) and Long Beach Cablevision, Co. (a partnership in which Long Beech/Signal Hill Cable Communications Compan and Long Beach Cable, Inc. ("Long Beach/Signal Hill systems"~ are the sole general partners). The only operations of the Company end its subsidiaries are the Long Beach/Signal Hill systems. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company was formed on April 26, 1965 to acquire, own. maintain and operate cable television systems and on October 31, 1985 acquired Long Beach/Signal Hill Cable Communications Company and Long Beech Cable, Inc. in a transaction accounted for as 4 purchese. The results of operations have been included in the financial statements from November 1, 1985. Investment In Cable Televis ion Svetems The fair value of the acquired reception and distribution facilities end eeuipment was less than the m,rrhase ~rt~a $42,948,862 (which consisted of 539,707,836~Ln cash 5269,000 in deposits, 53,000,000 in notes payable and 5241,046 of liabilities assumed) by approximete7.y (16,776,445 which was attributable to franchise costs, covenant not to compete and goodwill. During 1986, the Company finalized [he purchase price end related costs resulting in a reduction of goodwill of 531fi,928. Reception and distribution facilities and equipment add itione are stated et cost. Depreciation is provided using the straiEht-line method over the estimated useful lives of the essecs (three to thirty years). Franchise costs are amortized over the reme7.n ing terms of the franchises. The covenant not to compete is amortized over twelve and one half years. Good~~all is amortized over forty years. Accumulated amortization of franchise costs, covenant not to compete and goodwill aggregated 51,323,899, 580,000 end 590,567, respectively, at December 31, 1986 and 5165,752 and 529,330, respectively, for franchise costs and goodwill et December 31, 1985. ~~~ _6_ Income Taxes Certain items of revenue or expense are recognized for income tax purposes and for financial repotting purposes in different time periods, end tax allocation accounting as prescribed by Accounting Principles Soerd Opinion No. 11 is the policy followed for such differences. The Company records investment tax credits by the flow-through method of accounting whereby, in [he year available for utilisation, the credits are applied as a reduction of income tax expense. Deferred Charges Deferred charges consist of $303,996 of loan acquisition costa, $322,635 of interest rate protection charges and $212,091 of organization costs. The loan acquisition costs are amortized over the life of the related debt, interest rate protection charges ere amortized over the period of the agreement and organization costs are amortized over three years. Subscription Revenues Subscription revenues billed in advance for services ere deferred and recorded in income in the period in which the related services ere rendered. Reclassification Certain amounts in the prior year finanical statements have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. AVAILABLE FUNDING COAUiITlOiNT The Company has the following additional funds available, if required: 1986 1985 Under revolving loan agreement with banks (see Note 3).......... $1,750,000 $6,000 000 Under shareholders' agreemen[ ' to provide additional equity..... 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total .............................. 4 750 000 $9,000,000 /w - 7 - NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE Notes and loans payable et December 31, 1986 end 1985 ere comprised of the following: ' 1986 1985 Revolvin end Term Loans e ompany es a revo.ving loan and term loan agreement with three banks pprovidingg for total borrowings of y32,000,000. The agreement provides for interest et 2.5 percentage points over the LIBOR rate which may be reduced under certain circumstances (effective rate of 9.Ox at December 31, 1986). A fee of .SZ is payable to each bank on such bank's percentage of the average daily unused portion of the revolving loan. Interest only is payable on a quarterly basis through September 30, 1988 at which time the revolving loan will be converted to a term loan and will be payable in increasing quarterly instalments through'1995 ........................ (30,250,000 626,000,000 Shareholders' Notes n connect on w [ the acgvisit ion of [he Long Beach/Signal Hill systems, the Company issued notes ~~ ce«niu si~arehoieers peering interest at 12.5. Interest is due quarterly commencing November 15, 19$8 if certain excess cash flow requirements are met, with Final interest payment end principal balance due October 31, 1993........ 12,000,000 12,000,000 Sellers' Notes n cT~ onnec[ion with the acquisition of the Long Beech/Signal Hill systems, the Company issued notes [o former owners bearing interest a[ 13.5T~. Interest is due each April 30 snd Octcber 31, commencing April 30, 1966 with final interest payment due October 30, 1990. Principal balance is due October 30, 1990, with prepayment under certain circumstances ....................... 3,000,OOG 3.000.000 Total ............................... l~~ -$- The Company has entered Snto agreements [o fix the interest rate on (19,000,000 of the revolving end term loans es follows: 5,000,000 at 10.442 through August 13, 1990 9,000,000 et 10.58x through June 17, 1991 5,000,000 et 10.682 through June 25, 1991 The above agreements tepresen[ an exchange of interest payments end the principal balance is not effected. The revolving and term loans are collateralized by substantially ell the assets of the Company. The agreement contains certain restrictive covenants. The following summarizes the maturities of amounts outstanding et December 31, 1986: 1987 ............................... S - 1988 .......................... 400 000 ..... 1989 .......................... , 2 000 000 ..... 1990 ............................... , , b 400 000 1991 - 1995 ........................ , , 38 2 0 0 0 0 0 Total ~ e. ~ . ..~, ~. .. _ .. .... ... ... ..... ~ a/ uUU U00 Less undrewn funds ................. 1,750,000 Total .............................. X45.250.000 4. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES Simmons Communications, Inc. ("SCI"}, as agent for the Company, acts es manager of the Long Beach/Signal Mill systems. SCI is paid a management fee equal to 2.SZ of rose operating revenues of the systrms and nqn od.tt ti....cl i,c^ ..~i`~ La ueie~aed until 1986aendc1985fwas ~562i568eand ¢83,863, respectivelyentEffective January 1, 1987, the management agreement was assigned by SCI to Simmons Communication Management Company, Inc. TNCODiE TAkES The Company has net operating loss end investment tax credit carryforwerds of approximately $6.1 million and =.5 million, respectively, expiring in the ear 1.000 and a net operating loss carryforwerd of approximately ~6.1 million expiring in the year 2001. Anpor~t ioniok~these^'arryforwards ($4 .5 million of net operatinx per iod^JanuaryVl, 19g5~tos Octobera31c, r1985, pzior to the date of acquisition. To the extent the pre-acquisition carryforwards ere utilized, the tax reduction will be accounted for es an ed~ustment to the purchase price (goodwill or educe other assets acquired). Benefits from utilizing carryforwards arising after the acquisition will be reflected in the consolidated statement of operations as extraordinary credits. ~D~ - 9 - 6 COMMITMENTS The Company tents pole space, office space end equipment under operating leases. Future minimum payments, by year and !n Lhe aggregate, under noncencelable operating leases with terms of one year or more are es follows: Thereafter .......................... 40.659 Total minimtm lease payments........ 7 1987 ................................ 6141,808 1988 ................................ 118 496 1989 ................................ , 118,496 1990 ................................ 89,742 Rent expense in 1966 and 1965 was approximately 6305,000 and 651,000, respectively, COSTS AND EXPENSES The following is a breakdown of costs end expenses: 1986 1985 Direct Operatingg . ..... ............ 6 5,449,636 6 934,827 Generelrand Adminietretive.......... 3,360,526 616,931 Marketing ........................... 1.503,998 102.838 Total ............................... 510.314.1b2 X1.654.596 /DO - 10 - ENCLOSURE 5 SAMPLE FRANCHISE RESOLUTION SUBMITTED BY SIMMONS /~9 CONBBNT The (insert City Council or Town Board or other appropriate entity] of the of (the "Grantor") hereby contents to and approves the eranefe~ control over Bcott Cable Communica- tions, inc. (the "Franchisee") and the cable television franchise issued 6y the Grantor, dated , ae amended on (the "Franchise") presently -hal~by ~rnnchisae to (S one or more entities controlled by eleven S. elmmone, (li) Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance corporation (or one or more eneitiee controlled by it or under common control with it) and/or (i!i) Media/Communications Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware Limited Partnership (or one or more entities con- trolled by it or under common control with it). The Grantor further consents to and approves the transler of the Franchise in trust, the mortgage, pledge or hypothecntion of the Franchise, and the grant of a security interest in the tangible assets of the cable system located in the to secure any indebtedness or obligations owed by the FranehTii or which hereinafter may be inourred by the Franchisee with respect to which indebtedness or obligations a security interest i^ grunted in all or substantially all of the assets of the Fran- ohiseer whether such security interest 1a a first or subordinateQ security interest and whether or not n •acurlty interest pursu- ant to this provision has already been granted by the Franchisee. The Grantor Further consent• to the •asrciss by any •ecurad na rhv of ir. r/~Nf. .. . .A .«~ ,. two ar~~~wi•• iA the event of n defaule by the-Franchisee in the payment o! its indebtedness or performance of !ts abiigation^ •ecurad thereby. The Grnnt or agrees to accept performance of Bcott'^ ohligation^ under the Franchise by such a secured party. Nothing contained herein ehnll constitute a waiver of nny right^ the Grantor may have to appcove any further trenef er or assignment cf the Franchise by the Franchisee or nny such secured party. (( O ~i RESOLUTION N0. 87-~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIfORN IA, APPROVING THE CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OVER THE CITY FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH SCOTT CABLE COMFIU NICATIONS, INC. WHEREAS, Scott Cable Conmun ications has anon-exclusive franchise granted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to authorize the cable television system in the City pursuant to Ordinance No. 210 and a Franchise Agreement effective April 18, 1985; and WHEREAS, Simmons Coa~munications, Inc. has entered into a purchase agreement to acquire owernship and control over the Scott Cable Communications system in Rancho Cucamonga, and has requested a change of owernship and control over the franchise; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the request for and hereby desires to consent to the change of own erhsip and control, with all terms and provisions of the agreement with Scott Cable Communications, to be assumed by 1) Simmons Cable Communications, Inc., 2) Allstate Insurance Company, and/or 3) Media/Communications Partners Limited Partnership, under the name of Scott Cable Communications, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does IIC~ Vy ICiV IVC LIIQ L. The request for change of owernship and control is hereby granted pursuant to all of the terms and conditions set forth in that certain agreement dated April I8, 1985. PASSED, APPRCV ED, and ADOPTED this th day of 1987. AYES: NOES; AOS ENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 19, 1981 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician c~c"^+o ~9 ~~1~~ > ~IA ~. i..2 19T ~ Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for CUP 85-12 located on the north side of Church Street, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by The English Cucamonga Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses RECOMlEND11TICN It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANRLYS[S/BACKGROUND CUP 85-12 located on the north side of Church Street, east of Archibald Avenue, in the Low Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 21, 1986. The Developer, The English Cucamonga Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, is submittl ng an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts; Certificate of Deposit Faithful Performance: E27,000 Labor and Material: E13, 500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. Respectfully submitted, ~.a.U 'NJ~~scy! 4HM:LB: dlw Attachments i~a RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~~~ (~., A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN [A, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 85-12 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on July 28, 1487, 6y The English Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Church Street, east of Archibald Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to 6e done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP 85-12; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvenent Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. d __ _~ ~,.,,R,-e .~ . ~~ r.. 's,..~ . • a a s a ~~ d` n d ~,' n ~ ~ se : ss . ~ s~ i ' ±i ss ~ sr ~~ s~ b $ wr. ~.m ~ V 9 ~ a C ~ ::, o a2.i p _~ o ~ ~ (- ~,,.~., 40_~. 1 a \c ~S~iS ~ R ~ o C 7~S / i'i ~ \ ~..~ O •n I~. ~; c o .,.. .~oa do vm 4~ __ SMEEf , t t ~~„_, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIJEERING OIVI$ION ~'R.o~'EeT' ~SI'-E ~` /~~] 1'1'P'~: TP17.E: cuP ez-~z err: -- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ~~pp c~~'^+o,~ ~i~9^ i ~. ~{i~i ~I r ~~ z 19i SUBJECT: Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security far Tracts 12671-1, -2, -3 and -4 located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Urive, submitted by Lewis Homes of California RECOMENBATION It fs recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tracts 12671-1, -2, -3, and -4, accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 12671-1, -2, -3, and -4, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain Ytew Drive, in the Terra Vista Planned Community, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 13, 1986 for the division of 21 acres into 122 lots. The Developer, Lewis Homes of California, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 51,034,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 511,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from Lhe high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.&k.'s have also been approved by the r.i ty Attorney. i, Respectfully submitted, ~w//o.,,a.U nJ •,yc..~t RHM:LB:dlw Attachments ~/S RESOLUTION N0. $• i~~•1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 12671-1, -2, -3, and -4 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12671-1, -2, -3, and -4, consisting of 122 lots, submitted by Lewis Homes of California, Subdivider, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive in the Terra Vista Planned Co~mnunity has Deen submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and MHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the F1na1 Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good anu sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOM, THEREFORE, RE tT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of safd City. ~S~ o ~ U R U t7 O x U - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 F~.~ ~~ TD: City Council and City Manager ie-% FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12850-3 located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Wilson Avenue, submitted by The Deer Creek Company MECOMMEIfflATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 12ti50-3, accepting the sub,iect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 12650-3 located on the East side of Haven 4venue, north of Wilson Avenue, in the Very Low Development District, Was approved by the Planning Commission on May 23, 1984 for the divfsion of 24.9 acres into 25 lots. ine ~. ~eioper, the veer Creek Company, is submitting an agreement and secu rf ty to guarantee the constriction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f248,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5124,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval 'nave been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. I Respec tfuily si~hmitted, (.(~~~U+/+./ce// 1/1.x.1+.-y! ~ , .-Y ~J'M1 M fir. ~/ ' RHM:LB:d1W ~ Attachments ~~g RESOLUTION N0. ~ / 'w 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 12650-3 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12650-3, consisting of 25 lots, submitted by The Deer Creek Company, Subdivider, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Nilson Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said Cfty as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication far public use the streets delineated thereon. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 7 Tha4 aiA Im,..n,..un.,.M f....~~..1• ~ a_a and sufficient, subf ect to approval ~asY toy form rand content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 2 ~~~Y~Y-^. =R. ~ - a ~._ ''( >MiNCL' NAf TRM :~?: ve '"; `0 ..T F o, .- ~ ~ '. vAC^~S» a ii i ue i... _. _3 ~~ i~ - _~- ~- .:~ 1 WILSON AVENUE N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rr~c: ~~ TRACT 12650-3 ENGII~EERIIVG DIV?ffiON CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ~ ~`~~1'c y .~ , ,., <G Y z ~I, it p p F1 V "iZ I9T, ~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 86-26 (Phase II) located between Arrow Highway and Jersey Boulevard and between Utica Avenue and Vincent Street, submitted by Martin Jas ka, Incorporated RELp/ENCATION It is recamnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND DR 86-26 located between Arrow Highway and Jersey Boulevard and between Utica Avenue and Vincent Street, in the General industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on September 22, 1986. Martin Jaska, Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance 9ond: $195,000 Labor and Material Bond; E 97,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Rnnespec tfully submitted, /Cw~.,e // 'mil ~~+~-v~ .i x K~~ ~~ :.,~., gory '!' RHM:LB:dlw Attachments /a / RESOLUTION N0. $1 r ~-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 86-26 (Phase II) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement agreement executed on July 30, 1987, by Martin Jaska, Incorporated, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located between Arrow Highway and Jersey Boulevard and between Utica Avenue and Vincent Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 86-26 (Phase II); and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. MOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLV EO by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is . -.. City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. i i j ~~ I ~, r ~, ~ ', ' ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a.R. 86-26 ~~' ~~I ~~ ~ ~ swr.w~u. .._ ~ ~ '~ .rte-,- - -- - ~ C _, _ ----~ ~: L _~ wIK KIf11ML CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ~I '~ ~.... gyn... Y N ITEM: D,R, 86-26 (PHASE il) EXI~1T: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIvIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMIEMBATIOM: G~GMO'yC Y a is ~I FII ~ '> 19"i The repuired street improvements for Tract 12320-1 and Tract 12320 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 587,700. Background/Analysis Tract Nos. 12320-1 and 12320 - located on the Southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street. DEVELOPER: Barclays - Terra iSJo cast i/Ln aLreet, quite zlo Santa Ana, CA 92705 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) ;87,700 Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ :.~_ RNM:CB:dlw /~~ RECORD IN6 REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA P, 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NNEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 9173D NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tract 12320-1 and Tract 12320 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. n. t~f loth a... _e n~_.._a .nom _ u~ u ., yu+~, . tha rc na5 FVi1,~Ii c1.CU VO Lile hereinafter described real property the cork of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Tract 12320-1 and Tract 12320 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whale was: Barclays - Terra 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: ._u tneast .orner of Archibald and Yicf.Bria Street CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner ate usse agu re City Engineer / ~S RESOLUTION N0. ~1~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEMENiS FOR TRACT NOS. 12320-1 AND 12320 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK NHEREAS, the construction of pubiic improvements for Tract Nos. 12320-1 and 12320 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF KANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 19, 1981 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H, Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Mot ice of Completion RECOMIfNBATiON: ~GL~M~iyn 9 i n .I i f}-~ I~Z a lal The required street improvements for Parcel Map 9687 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 522,500. Background/Analysis Varcel MaD 9687 -located Northeast corner of Santa Anita and 4th Street. DEVELOPER: Prizio and Prizio 1200 puail Street, Suite 165 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) (22,500 Re~ectfully submiyt~ted, S ~_ /~y ` RHM:CB: dlw ~~~ RECORDING REQUESTED 8Y: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TNAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Parcel Map 9687 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 7 nn rhq tarti we ~s e.. .«_ toc7 tw., _ cc;„t.,ct;:C a., the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Parcel Map 9687 4. The name of the original contractor for Lhe work of improvement as a whole was: Prizio and Prizio 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Np rthe35t rnrrer Of jant3 A,^,i to and Qth ~t7'eet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipai corporation, Owner ate usR sefll agu re City Engineer ~O RESOLUTION N0, q~.~.•z.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9687 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 9687 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the Mork is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Oernardino County. i CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA °~M~'~ STAFF REPORT ~~ " ~ .c ~~ 1'- ~;, ~I GATE: T0: FROM: BY: SU6,]ECT August 19, 1981 _~;I a z ~> City Council and City Manager '~I Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector Release of Maintenance Bond far Tract 12523, located on the north side of Lemon Avenue, East of Archibald Avenue RECOMEMDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance Deriod has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, DEVELOPER: Eastwind II Joint Venture 1365 West Foothill Boulvard, Suite 6 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) E45,590.00 R^s/pe~ct~f ully submitted, /~,." ~ ~~ ~RHM: CB:d)w /3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECgiME11011TI0N: c<<'a+o~ ~~ v ~~ it ~~ F ~ I~Z 19" I The required street improvements for Tract Nos. 11663, 12019 through 12023 and 12026, Church Street Improvements in connection with Tract 11663, Tract 12019 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of E15, 000, $11,000, and $112,300, Background/Analysis Tract Nos. 11663. 12019 through 12023 and 12026, - located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona gvenue south of Church Street. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Deve iopment 2079 Century Park East, Suite 1550 Los Angeles, CA 90661 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 15,000 $ 11,000 5112,300 Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ /„ ~...trt~._ ~ ~~~ _ ~ ____ RHM:CB:dlw ~~~ RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NNEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tract Nos. 11663, 12019 through 12023 and 12026 2. The ful'• name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Nancho Cucamonga, California 91730. ?. On ~,.c 1DLb daq Auyuo i, lgoJ, mere was completed on *.he hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Tract Nos. 11663, 12019 through 12023 and 12026 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement ds a whole was: Marlborough Development 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Be *. wee.^. A.rcn~^a!d Avenu2 a~~d "n a~~ona Avenue south of Church Street CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON CJI, a municipal c^^poration, Owner usse H. aguire City Engineer /3~- RESOLUTION ND. 8'1-y-2(/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 11663, 12019 THROUGH 12023 AND 12026 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEP.EAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract Nos. 11663, 12019 through 12023 and 12026 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Not'ce of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion wf th the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 19, 1987 G~GMO ~' ~ ~~'r re r 4: ^ ~~ L iii Q A U a City Council and City Manager 19%% Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Cathy Becker, Public Norks inspector Release of Maintenance Cash Bond for Tract 11797, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line Read RECOMlENR11TIQ1: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain Free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Elite Development 17581 Irvine Boulevard Tustin, CA 92680 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Bond (Street and Storm Drain) E16, 800 Respectfully s mitted, ~~ ~j ~' - ~- ,_~; , RHM:CB: diw /3 y CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE; August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Not ire cf Completion RECOMENRIlTION: ~~pp G~;'CAAfp K` ~7 ~~~~ ~i; ~il; TJ ~ !P z _ > I9'? The required street improvements for Tract 12237 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maf nten ante Guarantee Bond in the amount of Ei4,400. authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorise the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of E144,000. Background/Analysis Tract 12231 - located North City Limits, East side Mernosa DEVELOPER: Dtck Scott, Inc. 1111 Ninth Street Upland, CA 91186 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $14,400 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $144,000 Respectf uily submitted, NHM:CR:ma ~~ RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON OA P. 0. Box 801 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: TR12237 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is; CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. Ort the 19th day of August 1987 there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract tloc uments fnr: TR12231 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Dick Scott, Inc. 5, The real property referred Lo Herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as fol':ows: North City Limits, East Side Hermosa Rvenue CITY OF RF. ECHO CUCAMON GA, a municipal corporation, Owner usse agu re City Engineer f~~ RESOLUTION N0. V~ /~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12237 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12237 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engf neer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ,_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer dY: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECO!lENMTION: ie; The required street improvements for TR12237-2 have been completed in to acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of E14,700, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5141,000, 8ackgroun d/P.nal ys is TR12231-2 - located at the North City limits East Side Hermosa .oven ue DEVELOPER: 01 ck Scott, Inc. 1111 N. Ninth St. Upland, CA 91186 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) E14, 700, Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) E147, 000, Respectfully submitted, RRM:CB:ma o ~T p /3~ RECORDING REQUESTED eY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR P, 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: CITY CLERK C iTY OF RANCHO CUCAMGliGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 9113C NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THRT: 1, The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: TR12237-2 2, The full name and address of the undersigned owner is; CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130. 3. On the 19th day of August 1981 there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: TR12231-2 4, The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Dick Scott Inr. 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Ndrtn r,;ty L,'m;ts East Side Hermosa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal 'orporation, Owner usse agu re Cfty Engineer /3 9 RESOLUTION N0. ~~.~2, ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUiCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TR12237-2 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for 'fR12237-2 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 10696 bounded by Civic Center Drive, Nhite Oak ar,d Red Oak Streets, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities, A California General Partnership RECOMEN~gTI011 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 10691 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis/Background rarcei nap i0ovo was approved oy the Planet ng Cnmmisslcn on duly B, 1987, for the division of 39.39 acres of land into 3 parcels in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District bounded by Civic Center Drive, Nhite Oak and Red Cak Streets. improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. R~e'Jspectfully submitted, ~.~J„ ' P,HM:LB:dlw Attachments 1977 ~q c~c"^+oyc, ~C' 9 =i y A ~-!'' ~ i~ T/ RESOLUTION N0. $~'4'LVj A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOtIGR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10696 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 10696} WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel MaD Number 10696, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities, R California General Partnership and consisting of 3 parcels, bounded by Civic Center Drive, White Oak and Red Oak Streets, Was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Farrel Map Number 10696 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, ail cf the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 10696 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. U~ { ~~ ~ ~~ II '3 ;4 ' ', .+ r :~ _,:: ~.r ,~.,. .> ti~ .... ~.~ ... .. . .... y .~ .~ 0 a J W V C 6 C7 ~11~ O Ir v a D ~ U O U nrmv nc n w w+n vn nrrn , vnvn ~ STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician L~......,V '4` ~ ~ 1> LL ~ 1977 SUBJECT: Accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and Approval of Parcel Map 10444 located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities, a California General Partnership RECOMMENDtl1TI0l1 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, approving Parcel Map 10444 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause sane to record. Analysis/Background Parcel Map IU444 was approved 6y the Planning Commission on dune 10. 1987. for the division of 17.fiR aura of land into 7 narrrlc in the industrial Specific Plan Development District located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue. The developer, Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities is submitting a lien Agreement for constructing 1/2 the medium island in Foothill Boulevard. The remainder improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit issuance. Respectfully submitted, w..U -nta~+.y.r .~~~ RHM:LB: dlw Attachments ~~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~ _~Z~ A RESOLUTIOI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCRMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10444 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MRP N0. 10444) NHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 10444, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities, A California General Partnership and consisting of 3 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 10444 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have nun been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 10444 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ((z ~` "'i . ~i .; I el' o i ° Ail .I ~ ~~ ~a. ill i l t: i =~` i n,•. i ~?r F,.., ,~ -~ ~nuei is wowu~ -~~~ a i F~.y ~ ~~~ 1 _ ij_ ~ ~~ ~~ _ ., 1• • ~.' if ~l i 1 li ~ ~ ~ . ...~, :, ~ ...~. .,. i ~, ' i ~ ~ : , t~~~ :~ :~ .. • a: .~ .. e . ' + ~~.. 3 '~ 0 d. t J W U C a •~: r~l j'. ii i% ,a .~r.~ zo ~~ U A :a c7 U O U ~d RESOLUTION N0. ~ !r~`~ I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANCHO CUCAMON GA BUSINESS PARK EQUITIES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PRRTNERSHIP, FOR PgRCEL MAP 10444 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANO CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Map 10444, located at the southwest corner of Spruce Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities, A California General Partnership was approved on ,tune 10, 1987; and WHEREAS, Installation of 1/2 the median island on Foothill Boulevard, established as prerequisite to recording Parcel Map 10444, has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 ~!'~, ~f7i F" ~t1 T0: City Council and City Manager ~y;; FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civii Engineer SUBJECT: Award the "Archibald Avenue Realignment from 19th Street to Highland Avenue with Improvements on Highland Avenue" Project to Laird Construction, Incorporated, for the amount of E271,100 RECOMENDf1TIBN: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for the "Archibald Avenue Realignment from 19th Street to Highland Avenue with Improvements on Highland Avenue" Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Laird Construction Incorporated for the amount of f271,100. Background/Analysis Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on Tuesday, August 4, 1987 far the subject project. Laird Construction, -Ji yJiu uyyuic ciYviu i.~i is ~ --ai~~ of~E292,582.21~(see attached bid~5ummary). The Engineer's estimateVwas E271,100. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be compl eTe and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. R~ pectf idly submitted, ~~_ RHM:SA:dlw ~" S W 1~ a z rn Z Wd O O ti N N U J N ~ G U N O O d W x o ~ to 6 d W H O N 1~ ~ w C OC N Y w ~ W V N 2 W d .. N ~ O O~ 2 a r u a a w ~ t- z o O U N H_ Y W W J ]~ J O d' S d i E Y "'~ J Y N a O 2 a J f7 S H S 4 • O W d C O O U 2 W J 2 S Q O a W s ^ o K H w JO w C H m N S S H O ~ OL N 2 O 1- O U u -+ w r o a K O Q u J J T r fNr! N~ M N 0 m Y ~J S ~~9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 ~q ~i,C,~Mp K~ ~'. ~~ j x! '~G~ r Z _~ U F 19T' To: city Council and City Manager FROM: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner~Y II ~'~,'C~ c17B,7EC.T: Award of Contract for Engineering Design 5=e~lrv~ic es for North Town Park Project. ReCOmmendatlon: That City Council award the Engineering Design Contract for the North Town Park Project to Purkiss-Rose Associates, in the amount of $2a,5oo.oo plus a lo& contingency. Background: North Town Park will be a 5 acre neighborhood facility located on Feron Boulevard between Turner and Archibald. The conceptual plan for the park, approved by City Council on Febn:ary 18, 1987, includes a 9-station exercise course, a tot lot play area, a dedicated, lighted ball field, a hackot hall hardrnnrY r>etrnnm farili*inc anA .,r on tnrf araa with picnic-tables and barbecues. Originally scheduled to open in the summer of 1987, design and construction of the project had to be delayed due to the necessary design and placement of the Area 7 storm drain, a portion of which will be located along the westerly edge of the park property. Staff recommends contracting the services of Purkiss-Rose Associates for the engineered construction drawings of North Town Park. The competitive bid process was used in consultant selection for the Hermosa Park Project and 'rurkiss-Rose Associates was well in line with the bids sceived at hat ,.ime. Also, their bid of $24,500.00, for the Tin rrh T^:':^. Park nr••j°.t i5 mpetit i•re wi tl. MiAs currently being received for park proj erts and the City would save 30 to bC days in the formal bid process. Purkiss-Rose associates has a very good working relationship with the ~:ity, as exemplified by their work on the Hermosa Park Project. /S v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1981 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y• Duane Baker, Administrative P,s list ant ~' ~ < 9 z r ~i ~ F;I, U IZ ',S 19]] SUBJECT: Authorization to Place Crossing Guard on Sapphire Street between Hillside Road and Banyan Street RECOMENCIITION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the placement of a crossing guard on Sapphire Street between Hillside Road and Banyan Street as recommended by the Public Safety Commission at their August 4, 1S87 meeting. Background/Analysis The Public Safety Commission has recommended the placement of a crossing guard at this location as a safety measure for the children attending Stork Elementary School. Staff concurs with the recommendation and has discussed the issue with Alta Loma School District staff, The exact location for the placement of the crossing guard on Sapphire Street has not yet been determined. The exact location will be established after a public hearing of the Public Safety Commission has been held to receive input from parents and local residents. Re :pectf ull su~ri~tt~ejd~, ~~9 /l / ~ ~ / RHM:DB:dlw ~S DATE: August I I, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor, City Council Members, and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PR (1FPSSIOFIAL SERVICE AGREEMEnIT. WITH SHANNON AND ASSGCIATES FOR A DEPIJTY CITY ENGINEER SEARCH NOT TO EXCEED $9,500 RECOPAMEfJDATION Approval of Professional service agreement with Shannon and Associates for ^ Deputy City Engineer search not to exceed $9,500. BACKGROUND The City Council on July I5, 1987 authorized staff to contract with Shannon and Associates, a professional search firm, to handle the recruitment process for the Deputy City Engineer position. A cost of $6,500 and reimbursement of direct related expenses of such items as advertising, travel, long distance telephone c^Ilc, printing and postage/delivery charges not to exceed $3,000; ^ total amount not to ~ ro cnn If you hove any yuesiions or concerns regarding this matter feel free to contact me. RARsIs ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ o V,i $ 3 a 19ii /s" PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is mode and entered into this !9Th day of August, 1987, between the City of Roncho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Shannon and Associates (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT'S. A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofare issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to an executive search for o Deputy City Engineer ("Project" hereafter). (ii) CONSULTANT has now wbmitted its proposal for the performonce of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, the City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is quolified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ogreed by and between CITY and CONSULTP.NT as follows: R. Agreement. ~. veniu non>. ...c ~..~~.......y .,~~~~~~~~.,~.~ .,. ~.. ~...,.r., ... ..._ ._.._.. ..., ._. ._, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Prniec}: The nxecu}ive search far o UepuTy City Engineer described in Exhibit "A" Scope of Services hereto. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary fo be performed by COPJSULTANT in order rn complete the project. (c) Completion of Project: The date of completion of all phcses of the project is set forth in Exhibit "B" Project Schedule attochod hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall tarthwith undertake and romp!ete the project ... ,,., ~..~,,..~~.... ..~~~.._xhibit "P." a^.d ^.,aG aahin ~. ij?h, -gdnrni~ Sin in and i iT. c}a to test regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CI?Y. X53 (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of oll reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the time specified in Project Schedule, Exhibit "B". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A". CITY may }hereafter review and Toward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY sholl receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant To this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written a;rprovgl of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be full qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor snall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $9,500.00 for services reyuire.i iieraunder. tots sum siioii cover jo,aw for professional services ona a maximum not }o exceed $3,000 for related expenses for such items as travel, advertising, long distance telephone calls, priniirg and postage/delivery charges. Payment to CCNSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in eccordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibi! "A". (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submit?ed by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CI'iY. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Exi~ihit "A.. iii =.iN$vLTAi~T iiyie<~ iiwi, in nu evenl, siwil ~~iTY be reWit ed iu pay to CONSULTANT any Burn in excess of 95%of the maximum payable hereunder prior in receipt by CITY of aU final documents, together with all supplemental technical doc.~ments, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CT'~ Final payment shall be wade not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and ncrep lance }hereof by CITY. _2_ /S / (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in wri tinq, by CITY, and nat included in The Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within o reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to The project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in o6toining information from other governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be CONSVLTANT's responsibility To make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be deliverd to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT nt least fifteen (S) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In no event, however, shall COtJSu LTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. COf 15ULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not termingte this Agreement except for cause. 7, !latices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this Paragraph 7. The below named individuals, fur}herrnore, shall he those I>nrsnns primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Hobert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager. Any such notices, demo ds, invoices and written crnnmunications, by mail, shall he deemed to have been received by the a~'dressee forty-eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid end properly addressed as set forth above. 3/ j.5 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY rwr shall CONSULTANT allow ony subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: la) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Fsefore beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurence for oll persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this (b) Public Liability and Property Domage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, of CONSULTANT'S sole cost and e::Dense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and COPJSI'I_TANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT'S activities, providing protection of a} least One Million i~)oliars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to anyone per<on or for ony one occident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($I,000,OOO.OG) for property star^aqe. ,~• _ non i~ im;og~np,• ,-i-in~Gi ii Td,hi7 ;. iii tnvu n~~t nnii m, _.n,{ain nt nll times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ("malpractice") providing protection of at least N/A for errors and omissions ("malproctice") with respect to loss arising from actions rr CONSULTANT Derfarning engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. -4- i j (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed To do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, To the extent obtainable, to the effect that (I) the insurer, insured and all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected off iciols, officers, employees, and ggenls; (2) the policies are primary and nonconiributirg with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) Hiey cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, cfficers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment 6y CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited To, all consequential damages, ., a ~... i _... 10. Assianment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any port or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. I I. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for nny purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce „ ,,,. ., ., r .._. _.. of the GgrPement, the nrevaiii nn rxviy in .void leuul ulateeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in nn amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. -5- _ ~S 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to fhe subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representction by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this A.greemen} as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dennis L. Stout. Mayor Date ATTEST: Cheverly A. Authelet, City Clerk Approved as to form: i ~ ,-' /~'~ ` City Qtt~~jorney _(r / ~_. ~i. Exhibit A EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROCESS The executive search process presented below is designed to provide The City with the full range of services required to assure the ultimate selection of an Deputy Cify Engineer that is uniquely suited to the City's needs. PHASE I -ESTABLISH JOB REQUIREMENTS Task I -Review and Firalile Search Process and Schedule A critical first step in the engagement is a thorough review of the search process and schedule with the City. This will insure that the City's needs are rnet in the mast complete manner possible. Task 2 -Establish Job Requirements This task will be accomplished during c work session involving iFie Community Development Director, City Engineer and the consultant. This task will result in the identificatian of the personal and professional aTTributes required of the new Deputy City Engineer and include the following activities: Clnrfy and refine the grab and objectives of the Engineering Division. Iden tifv the rnnAitinnc nnrl rhnllP~~..~ IILoI~ f.. 6e e,.....~...~.,....J achieving these goals and objectives. Describe }he style of working re ln}ionsh ip it wishes is established with }he Deputy City Engineer. Generate c list of specific competencies, experiences and personal sitribu tes needed by the Deputy City Engineer in light of the analyses conducted above. The rorsuliont will present several rerruiiment and selection sirs}egies for the City's considers Pion. After nssessinq the benefits and liabilities of each technique, the Cify e~ill select }he recruitment and selec, tion Process most likely to produce the intended results. Task 3 - Pceporc Summary Resort Following the completion of the above rneetinq, n repart surnmarizinq the Astn and decisions generated during the meeting will be prepared and presented to the City far review. This document will provide the basic pararne. tors within which each step of the search process will he rr ducted. /s9 PHASE II -RECRUITMENT Tmk I -Identify and Contact potential Cmdidates This task wi!I include a variety of activities designed to attract the best available candidates. The consultant will: Contact leading local government public works executives, as well as con<ulting engineers throughouT California }o identify ou istanding potential candidates. Provide each potential ca~~didate with an indepih written description of the City and The personal and professional attributes the City is seeking in an Deputy City (:ngineer. Personally contact each potential cendidate to explain the career opportunity, answer questions, and encourage them to submit a resume. Task 2 - CandTCt Initial Screening All resumes will be submitted directly to the consultant for initial screening. Thrs screening process is specifically designed to assess the personcl and professional attributes she City is seeking and will include: A thorough review of each candidate's resume and other wpporii rrq materials. Screening interviews with those candidates that appear to best meet the City's needs. Task 3 - Irdepth Background Checks i=allowinq }he completion of the above tusk the consultant will ronduct indept background checks on those randidates who appear }o best meet The r~i}y's needs. Typicnl areas explored in the background checks include: Verification of infonna}ion furnished by The prospective candidate through the resume and personal interviev,~. 'Nritten and oral communication skills. Ability to analyze and solve problems. Plnnninq and nrgani~otion skills. ~Nnnagement and leadersh lp skills. Interpersonal sensitivity. ~ bmposurr and self control. /~ O Flexibility. Technical knowledge. The candidate's fit with the City's organizational culture. The candidate's career potential. Task 4 -City Selects Finalists Al the conclusion of the previous task, the consultant will prepare o report summarizing the results of the recruitment process including the iden}i}ication of those candidates which appear to best meet the City's needs. The consultant will meet with the Assistant City Manager, Community Development Director, City Engineer and, if appropriate, the City Manager to review this report and to assist the City in selecting a group of finalists for further evaluation. Task 5 -Coordinate Selection Process If desired by the City, the consultant will coordinate the selection process for the City. This includes scheduling interviews, contacting both the successful and unsuccessful candidates, and facilitating the selection process. PROJECT TIMIP'G ANO COST TIMING We are prepared to begin immediately and con complete all search activities in approximately 6 to 8 weeks. This schedule assumes Thot no advertising would be placed in professional journals. If advertising is utilized the schedule would he approximately 12 ar 14 weeks. COST Fees for professional services wovid be 56,500. The only additional charges would be for reimbursement of direct related expenses for such items as travel, odvertisi ng, long distance telephone, printing, and postage/delivery charges. Prof essionnl fens and reimburseable expenses will be billed nonih ly. /~ EXHIBIT B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROJECT SCHEDULE Task Comp. fktte Phase I -Establish Job Requirenxnts I. Review and finalize search process and schedule Comp. 2. Establish job requirements 8/04 3. Prepare summary report 8/04 Horse II - RECRVITMENT Identify and contact candidates Ploce advertising 8/14 identify potential candidates 8/28 Prepare brochures 8/14 Provide brochures to candidates 8/28 Follow-up contacts with candidates 9/il 2. Conduct initial screeninq Filing date 9/25 I'~eview resumeslbac kground checks 10/09 Candur,} screeninq interviews 10/23 7. Conduct indepih hackground checks 10/30 a ... i ire e_ _rie r ._ ieie a ~r mil /~ ..a z Offw of Ne MaYa i - :~.- R9~SA,4, the Joint Caapora ttino CamnittPO of Southern California Chapter, Am eri mn PubZ is Norka Asaociati on and Southern Ca Z iform:a Districts, Aeeoci atod Conoral Contractors of California ew a vod for an up-CO-date, industry-esnaitive, uidoiy accepted unifozm set of specifications, uhtiah uouLd oZ ininato conf2iate and confusion, Zwer ronetruction teats aM onaourage mono empoti Lino bidding by those who build public works praj sate; and, M9~&L4, for the past tuenty years these orgar:ioatione haae been providing for thtie nsod through the pubticutinn of the Standard 'i ' n t ~ handbook, carom on:p known ae the Creanbook; a+d,` YHAf6AS. the City of Rancho Cucmnong-: :nd tits ci tizene hone greatly Serra,"itad f ran th sae epe cificati rna in heZzri na to vrw ido for high nualitr. public warka in the City; therefore, 8S IT RBSOLVBD 28AT, Ehe :ity of ~unaho Cucmn enga da ee hereby rF. r'n l:niZP. L{+P nntn i. {+y t. f: nfil mnda to f4o !'i Ir, nnA •I.n ..ni ...,F)in M. r ., Fouther^. ^al ifornia ~fiapt er of the Am eri _^an PubZi: Jar kaeAeaa ei~ Lti on and the °c uthsrn :ifar.r.'a Di striate of the Aaeociated ~: ens rai Contractors of 'siifornia~3Joint Conpora tins Committee through tr. sir cubl nti on o° the roe snook; snd, :omm endo tho Joint ::"oo oerative mittse r.;r ire success during the pa et tuenty years ae an i:nova to in She";~ - pub Zia ,;arks and rz nt:ai pa tae many mars years of 'nnamz:i on and for athought twarde the ..-~- ~:+an wr a cf pubs tie war"ae in our :: l.p nnc uroughouu use uorZ d, It 4I711H55 Mg889UP, Ca nn's ;. .'~.c uv, '+a;: nr v. the ': a of ,Rancho :uem^c nga '^, sue her o+mto not ^p hand n ^.'ca used Ehs .~a a: _, 'he ~:. .u or .rancho ''mmr:nnpc to to .,. Gr.s :J Eh duauat, :.r -> L -- CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE; August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Peter Tune, Administrative Analyst c~`c^a+o ~° ~: '~'' + ~ ~~ h p F!' ~ ! Z a w.- SUBJECT: Approval and execution of Renewal Agreement with South Bay Sweeping Company of Gardena far the sweeping of designated paved, curbed streets from July through October 1987, for the sum of 81,869,00 RECOMENBATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Renewal Agreement with South Bay Sweeping ConQany of Gardena for the sweeping of designated paved, curbed streets from July through October, 1987, far the sum of 81,869.00 per month and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute said Renewal Agreement. Background/Analysis In accordance with contract provisions, our contractor has submitted an executed Renewal Agreement and insurance certificates for renewal of the increase. ~ Due to the yfact that the City ~is scheduled to+expand its street sweeping capabilities, staff anticipates that the services of South Day Sweeping will be required only through October of this year. Respectfully submitted, RHM:PT: dlw /~' •I~~.-%~-~_.e_-~~LLVSCV/ i Ili /~ DATE: T0: FROM: 8Y: SUBJECT: - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L~JCA.1{p STAFF REPORT ~~' ~~. ,.. C ~~ III ~i~ August 19, 1987 F'-"~, ~ P,z _ .> City Council and City Manager is%% Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer 1 Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 86-13 located on the north side of Ninth Street, East of Yineyard Avenue, submitted by Messenger Investment Company RECONEMDATIDN !t is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the sub,tect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND DR 86-13 located on the north side of Nfnth Street, east of Vineyard Avenue, in the Neavy Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on December 10, 1966. The Developer, Messenger Investment Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 516,000 Labor and Material Bond: E 8,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk s Office. Respectfully submitted, ~/ .S~ ~n.~.. /d'oZr ~ WiM:LB: dlu Attachments RESOLUTION N0. ~1 i 1~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 86-13 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its considerattan an Improvement Agreement executed on July 24, 1987, by Messenger Investment Coiyany as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Ninth Street, east of Vineyard Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to Lhe terms thereof, 1s to be done in conjunction with the develogaent of said reai property as referred to Planning Coamission, OR 86-13; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by goad and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ARROW P.OUTE z 'a a Y u~ Y NINTH STP.EFT w z t J r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i~ ~~ D.a. 86-i3 INGIIJEERING DM9ION EXHIBIT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer Zp GVGNO'lh ~ ~> -~ ~ A h .,, I> 19~~ SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Area VI[ Storm Drain/Main Line Improvement Project. REC01/ENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Area VII Storm Drain/Main Line Improvement project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/RNR LYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by UPS, Incorporated, reviewed by staff and approved 6y the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $900,000,00. Legal advertising is scheduled far August 24, 1987, and August 31, 1987, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. September 4, 1987. ,R`espectf ully submitted, ~/ ~~~~ CAHM:SA:jh !W~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~~~'p1 I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "AREA VII STORM DRAIN/MAIN LINE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared pl anc and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcif ications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Area VII Storm Drain/Main Line". 8E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the Citv Clerk in the offices of the Citv of Ranrhn Cucamnnaa. nn nr hefnre fhe hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 4th day of September 1987, sealed bids or proposals for the "Area Vfi Storm Drain/Main Line" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "Area VII Storm Drain/Main Line" PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of oer diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work 's serforr~ed, and not less than the general arevailfno rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. lri that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9 '0 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pens alty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five doll are (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured aporen tices may he employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1177.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which adninlsters the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior Lu Lim ieyucal iur per Lifiwie, ur 6. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of oae to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through aDPr enticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established For the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any appr en ticeahle trade on such contracts and if Other vur. ~r aCt6ri on the puul ie wGr k> i'i to dre nlek ii,y aucil can Lr ibuLionS. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777,5 and 1177,6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 1, Chapter I, Article 3 of the labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than of ght (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ii iile i.iiy ui Ran~iw %u~anuuya awarue iiie ~uu it a~i vu iiie ueni iuwoi bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall 6e returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the ccntract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished far the performance of the work contracted to be done 6y the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering hiz employees upon work to be done under contract which may 6e entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cuc amonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has net been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) 1n accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (C al Sfornia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of E25.00, said E25. 00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mafled when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of E15. 00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities 1n lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. nor aA chic Aav of to PRSSED AND gDOPTEO by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 19_ ATTES?: ,. rtv ~~er~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT MTE: August 19, 1981 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer ~uc.*MO,yc 2[~' ~ t j rel n y,~~ IA F, ~ 2 ~, > i97i SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Haven Avenue Medians, Phase II Improvement Prgj ect iron 4th Street to Arrow Route NECOMEN011TION It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Haven Avenue Medians, Phase II Impro venent Prole ct and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROLND/ANALYSIS the subject project plans and specif icatians have been completed by Randolph Rlubik Associates, and Madole Associates, Inc., reviewed Dy staff and approved 6y the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is E1,300,000.W Legal advertising is scheduled for August 24, 1987, and AnQUSt 31, 1987, with the bid ooenina at 7.30 n.m, September 4, 1967. Respectfully submitted, ~~...~E' ~ i~ %~..~ RH M:SA:jh RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ' T7V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE MEDIANS, PHASE fI", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spcifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Haven Avenue Medians, Phase II". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed 6id5 or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardfno County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the n n.. I,j tJ _L •_ ~- ~"V W~IV IIyO VII VI UCI VIC IIIC hour of 2:00^o'clock P~M. on the 4th day ^of y5eptember 1987, sealed bids or proposals for the "Haven Avenue Median, Phase II" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Haven Avenue Medians, Phase II". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in wnirn ino ngnli: y~nrk ,e po~sormed, and nct 1255 than the g2nerai Nr eVail ing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, y320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site, The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (E25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such labar?r, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in vTolati on of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1177.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship cumni ii.ee iias exceedeu an average or i~ percent rn the y~ eays prior to the request for certificate, or 8. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D, When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established fnr rile administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (E25. 00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work requ}red 6y this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least Len percent (10%) of the amount of said bfd as a guarantee - u 11 ~~dm Lilo Lire pi uymeu wuli a~i ii Lire scone is awarded tough im,~ andu~in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall 6e one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials dr supplies furnished for the performance of the work CC ., u,.t^d td b2 dune by the Co rd:rador, ur mty work or labor of any kind done thereon,~and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to 6e dove under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in Lhe Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of E35. 00 said 535.00 is nonrefun da6le. Upon written request by the oidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimburs able payment of f15. 00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract s ati sfacLory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, In accordance with the requirenents of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies wi thheid (performance retention}. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reiect any anA all hiAc By order of the Council of Lhe (; ity of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 19 PRSSED ANO ACOPTEC by :he Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this ~ day of 19_ ATTEST: 1 y er ~77 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Oate: August 19, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~ ~`'c""'o^c, ~( pia h VA ~° ~ ~Li 19s; By; Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Fred D. Hicks, Laura D. Hicks and Fredrick Hicks and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9814 Arrow Route RECBMEMDATIDN• It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Fred D. Hicks, Laura B. Hicks and Fredrick Hicks and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACK6Rg1M11/ANALYSIS: The attached subject Agreement between the City and Fred D. Hicks, Laura B. Hicks and Fredrick Nicks provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and street pavements along the Hicks' Arrow Route Frontage. The Hicks have agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widenina_ and improvement of Arrow Route in return for the construction of said improvements. Said street improvements will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Arruw Route Phase I Street Improvement Project from Archibald Avenue to Turner Avenue. Respectfully submitted, RI'M'LEN'pam V ~Jr""'C~7'~a'..°"-r" Attachments RESOLUTION N0. $~ "~ ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCH CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM FRED D. HICKS, LAURA B. NICKS AND FREDRICK HICKS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANO CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME YIHEREAS, the City Clerk of the CTty of Rancho Cucamonga to establish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Arrow Route Phasd I Street Improvement Protect; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights an6 street pavements located at 9814 Arrow Route, to be made part of the Arrow Route Phase I Street Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, Fred D. Hicks, Laura B. Hicks, Fredrick Hicks have agreed to dedicate Right-of-Nay as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NON, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED, that the City Council of the CTty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. / 7~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA STAFF REPORT Date: August 19, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer 8y: RTChard R. Coto, Associate Civii Engineer ,tp ~`~MO'~c ~~ r 7. IA ~;li ~ z u .> 19; 7 SUBJECT: Approval of the Environmental initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Ramona Avenue Improvements between Victoria and 19th Streets and approval of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemptior, therefor RECDMMEIOIITIBM: It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Ramona Avenue Improvements and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Ramona Avenue Improvements between Wctoria and 19th Streets. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State r...: ner:., .w. ,....~..,e .u.. w, t_ _. of the above-..e t ~~~~• ."' "`~ "vrcpa~,,.. pe~-9t wc~t~act~m~ -m n ioned~improvements. Said improvements generally entail the removal and replacement of Asphaltic Concrete Pavement as well as the construction of new Portland Cement Concrete Curb, gutter and sidewalk. [t is the Engineering staff's finding that the proposed pro,lect will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respec tful~lLy submf tied, n KQ~fn Gi i~-A.6~'b'°.- RHM:RRC:pam ~ Rttac hmen is / O ENVII~ONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITL~L STUDY -PART I senERu For all protects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Drotect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will Drepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no siggn if scant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The protect will have a significant envirommental impact and an Envirommental Impact Report will be prepared, ar (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed protect. Date Filed: wugust is. ..5~7 Protect Title: Rac~on;:..venue Imorrvements Applicant's Name, Address, Te lephane: City of Rancho Gucarnmige P.G. Ogx sW . Rarc ho Cucaronga, CA 41730 (714) 90S-iL'51 Name, Address, Te iephone of Person To Be Contacted Cmi~ern my Ln is 'rrgj ect: mane U. hra ndsen, Senior Civil Engineer _pod ress zng ohgne number sane as above. Location of Prateet: Raewna Avenue hetween Victoria Street ar.c :5th Street in Rancho Cucamonga, California Assessor's Parce} Nd,; Purl is right-of-way List other permits necessary from local, reatonal state and f deral encies and the agency issuing such permits: State o{ California, Oept. o`~ _ ira nsggrtation Eno roac hrnent Pernit ~ g1 I-l PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use ar proposed protect:The proieci: consists of the following: - r;, t arnnct ruc ri nn of a portion of Lhe existing asphalt concrete pavement and the renoval of existing unaerlying Portland cenent concrete Acreag8`of~pr8,~e~f°a~ea°an8 s`qu`are"""foofa`gd of existing and proposed Dufidings, if any: 1 21 acres - Ng exiting or proposed buildings Describe the environmental settin of the protect site including infonnatien on topography, so staDt ty, pants (tress), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, Land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The pro iect site is Located in a developed residential tract. All *•~ * improvements have existed for several years. A pcrtion of the east sine „s o~~,,,,n, Gvnoua ;~ rn n_a wi aeneG to match existing ultimate street witlth. The ion varnncr r.¢r;nn improvements within the protect site will nct have a ~c~n~rant;,t ;mnart nn land resources, plants ar animals. Additionally, there are nn c~'tura'. Yisto rival or scenic aspects to be significantly impacted. Is the project part of a larger project, actions, which although Individually small, environmental Impact NG one of a series of cumulative may as a whole have signfficant / Sa- I-2 MIII TNIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ ~ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of Froduce vibration or glare? y_ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ ~_ 5. Remove any existing trees? How manyt_2 ~, 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toz is substances, f iammables or explosives? Exp lanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): a. Noise ana vibraticn vill increase at the pro.i ec r, site only for the duration of reconstruc ticn. Rt the completion of the project, noise a na vibra tfon levels replantea on tl:e aojacent property or else~~here wi tY~in the City. 1. 'cstimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: Nmie A Fef imaho •h• ,_~~e a _!~ .d l-~~,~ trig- 'yv .e. atcu uni iy u~ vi,is project• +iU _ 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: 6C!i i0. if the Droject involves the construction of res?dentiat units, calplete the Fo'm on the next page. CERTIFICATIgI: [ hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be reouSred to ba yuhm;rted hefdre an adequate evaluation can be made 6y the Planning Divi;ian. ~//~~ ~~ d~ tn~y~.~- Date: ~-y-E7 Signature RneK....eS 'lam ^`e^~ Title Hssociaie Civil Enni ~P,3 I-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTROCTION The following information should 6e provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are reguired to secure letters Pram the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and imtat ive Tract No. Specific Location of Pro,lect PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin tonstructton: _ 4. Earliest date of occupancy: __ __ Model# and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Priee Range ~g~ I-4 CITY Or RANCHO CDCAMONCA PART 22 - INITIAL SIL'DY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE•_ ~ n c G 19A7 APPLICANT: Pity of Ra nr hn Curamnnaa FILING DATE:~uAuct 19. 1QA7 LOG NgltBER: 22-4637-$610 PROSECT• Rwmnna avnn ~e Imnr yPiIIPn Y< PROSECT LOGT20N: R„n~eon yir torn street and tii neteenth Street I. EWIAO\^1ENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" end "maybe" answers an nquirad on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. So Sls and Geology. G111 the proposal have azgni: scant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions ar in changes Sn geologic ralationshlpa7 ~- ~ h u. uisrupt ions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? ~ - c. Change Sn topography or ground surface contour intervals? ~_ __ - d. The des crucelon, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? __ ~ e. My potential increase in wind or voter etoalon aE eoile, affecting either on or off nice condf cons? f. Changes !n erosion sll cation, or depoaltion? -' ~ g. -exposure of people or property to geo to glc hazards such as earchquakaa, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? __ ~ h. M lnc reaae Sn the race of axeracelon and/or uu of any mineral resource? ~ ~ 2. Nydrol~, frill the proposal have significant results Sn: 6 ~ ,~!aJ 'a3e 2 YES °AYHE ;.0 a. Changan in currenca, or the course of direction of flowing stzeama, flvera, or ephemeral stream channels? X b. CAangea in absorpclon ratan, drainage pact erne, oz the rata and amount of surface vacer zuno£f? ~ ,_ c. Al ceraeiona co ehe eeuraa or floe of flood vatarn? ~ d. Change in the amount of surtaca vacer in any body of vaur? g e. DSachatgs into surface waters, or anp al nratlon of surfau vaur gwlicy? _ __ ~ f. Alteratiom of growdvacer eheracterfacica? ~ ~ g. Change in the gwncicy o[ groundwcers, either through dine[ additions or vleh- dravals, or through lncarfaranee with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? _, __ % h. The redueeion in the amount of vacer ochar- visa aval3abla far public vaur suppliu? X 1. Exposure o[ people or propasey to vacer relatsd hazards such as lloodln6 or aalchea? X 3. Air Quality. Nill ehe proposal have signif !cant reaulcn Sn: a. Constant or periodic air amiaeiona lrom mobile or iodine[ sources? X g utionary source? % b. Dacarloraclon of ambient air qualicq sod/or Sntartenne• with the atcadnmant of apDliubl• air quality aeandarda? ,_ X c. Alteration of to tai or regional climatic condl[Sans, affecting air movement, moiacun or temperature? _ _ X 4, g1_ca Flora. Nlll the proposal have sign ificanc raaulcs in: a. Change Sn the characcari sties of species, including diversity, diatribe [ion, or Wombat of any apsclu o! plants? ~ _,_, b. Reduction o[ tM nwbarf of any unlgw, ran or asdangered species of piGa(p~c's? % 6`~' .'d Q? . c. Introduction of nev or disruptive apeciea of plants Snco an area? d. Reduc cion in ehe po cancial for agricultural production? Fauna. 41111 [he propoaal have aignif scan[ rasa! to in: a. Change in the characterlstica of species, including diversity, diseributlon, or numbers of any speeiea of animals? b. Reduc cion of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered apeciea of animals? c. In[roduc[Son of nev or disruptive apeciea of animals Into as area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of ezls[Sng ESsh or vfidlife habicaU 5. Pooulacfon. Will the propoaal Nava significant renal ea in: a. u111 [he proposal alter the location, dlstr!- bucion, density, diversity, or gravth race of the human population of an area? 6. Will the propoaal af£eet existing housing, ar -.--.G . uam.uu iua addlrlanal nOW ing! 6. Socfo-Econanic Facrozs. WSll the propoaal have aignzz icanc results in: +. Change Sn Iocal or regional aocio-economic characterlstica, including aconomlc or commercial diversity, tax race, and property value? b. WLll prolecc coats be equicab ly distributed among prof act banef iclar Sea, i.a., buyers, tax payara or prat act users? ?. Land L'se and Plannin¢ Considerations. W111 th• _pcsal have sigma !cant resui ca tni a. A au6s cancial al Carat ion of the presene or planned land use of an area? 6. A conflict vleh any dealgnationa, oblectlvee, policies, or adopted Diana of any governmeneal antic lea? c. M impact upon the qulalty or quantiey of axis ci ng conaumptlve or non-eanaump cave reereatlonal opportun lc ivies? ~6~ YES :.AYE` SO e _ x X X X X X X X 'a3e Y°5 ~aY3°_ v0 8. Transeortation. Yfll the proposal have significant results in: a. Gnesaeion of aubseanelal addi[Sonal vehicular movement? X b. Effects on ezisting streets, or demand for nem etreee construcelon? _ X e. Etfseca on existing parking fat illtiea, or dsaund toz nev parking? X d. Subscaneial Impact upoe exlating transport~- cion ayscpa? g a. Alcerationr to present pateerns of circula- tion or movearet of people and/or goods? X f. Algrations to or affecn on preaene sad potential wcer-borne, rail, mesa eraneie or aiz trattic? X g. Incruses in [raffle hazards eo moeor whlcln, bicyellsu or pedes eriams? ~ 9. Cultural Resources. W111 the proposal Mw ^ignificant ruulta im: •. A die turbans to the integrity of arehaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resouress? ~ iu. gealth. Safety, and Nuisanes Faetora. Will the pro posal have significant resul ca La: a. Creation of any health hazard or pmtantlal healch hazard? _ ~ b. Exposure of people to potential healch hazards? ~ e. A risk of ezplosion or muse o[ hazardous subet+nco Sm eM went of an aacidanc? yi d. M Sncreaae in the number of 1ndlviduala ar apse Sea of vac cot ar pathanogenlc arganisma or the exposure of people eo such organisms? _~ d_ e. Increase in exia cing nolae lavsla? _ ~_ f. Exposure of people to potantlally dangerous nolae levels? X g. The crutlon of objectionable odors? _ yi h. M Sncreas• in light or glare? _ ~ /gF~ ~35e Y°S :,AY3= VO 11. Aesthetics. Mill [he proposal have ^ignif Scan[ results in: a. The o6strucclon or degradation of any scenic via to or viw? X b. The creation of an aeschatically offensive 91C!? v c. A conflict vleh the ab]ectlve of designated or potential scenic corridors? _ X 12. Utilities and Publle gervfces. Mill the proposal have a signiflunt need for nw systems, oz alterations to the follwing: a. Elect ric paver? X b. Natural or packaged gas? X e. Communlcatlons systma? _ X d. Mater supply? ~ e. Mastwater fac111t1es? ~ f. Flood control scruciuraa? _ _ ~ g. Solid vaace facilities? ~ h. Flze protect SOn? X 1. Police pro [action? X ]. Schools? x k. Parks oz other reczaational facilities? _ -__ ~ 1. ?4lntanance oL public fae111ties, including roads and flood control facilitlaa? ~ m. Other gowznmental sarvlcae? _ X 13. Enerxv and Scarce Resourt es. Mill [he proposal have ai gnlf SCan~ reeul cs in: a. Use of :ubs:antlai or excessive fuel or energy? X b. Substantial Sncrease in dmand upon existing sou rtes of energy? _ X c. M Snc resat in the dmand Cor development of nev sources of energy? _ X d. M increase or perpetwtlon of the conawptfon of non-ranwable forma of energy, when [eaaible renevabla sources o[. energy are rvailableT g /U/ ?a;e S YES :.AYBE v0 •. Substanc lal depletion of any nonrenewable or tGICa natural rlsOY CCe~ ~_ ~_ X 14. Mandaton Plndlnas of SSanlficanee. a. Does cha pzolect hate the potential to degrade the gwll tq of ihs emrironmant, subscancially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife aDaeies, caws a fish or vlldlifa population co drop below salt awtainleg lwels, threaten to aliminata a plant or animal eoeswacty, seduce the number or restrict the rang of a tan or andangerW plant or animal or e11m1wce important azamplea o[ the mayor periods of Glifornla hlseoty or prehietor7? X b. Does the prolaci have [ha potential to achieve short-urm, co the disadvantage o! long-tarn, environmancal gosla7 (A short-ears impact on the anwlroflma[I[ u one vhlch occurs in a nlaclvely brle[, dafiniclva period o[ clma while long- un Smpaeu will aadun wall into cha futon). _ % e. Doss the pro~set have lmpacta which an indlv1dw117 limited, Dut cuawlatively eonaiderabla? (Cumulativelq eonalderablm means chat the ineravwncal effects of u individwl prof eet era considerable when viewed in tonnactioo vleh the e[[acts of pant pro~ecce, and probable future pro~scca). _ % a. uoea ens project have anvSronmencal et[eets which vlll caw• aubsuntlal tdveru a[tects on human baiogs, alther diraeely or Sndlrsccly? _ X II. DISCOSSION OF F.Nt'IAONMENTAL AYACUATION (i. •., of afflrmativa answers co cha above quaselov plus t dlecuaaion of propoead mlcigaclon measures). SEE ATTACHED SHEETS /90 III. DETERMINATION On the •basis of this initial evaluaiton: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be Drepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HILL BE PREPARED. n [ find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the I_j environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. a I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Article 15 Class 1 c Section 15301 of the California nvironmental Qua ity ct. Date August 4, 1581 "^O'~-rl ~s.,,~d,p~ -Signature A ssoc iaie Civil Engineer iit e /~/ II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. Soils and Geology b a c There will be a minimum displacement of existing ground surface 26 feet in width, due to the widening of approximately 180 lineal feet of Ramona Avenue. There will also be subgrade soils preparation and compaction for the replacement of asphalt concrete pavement. 2. Hydrology b d c Construction of new curb and gutter along the east side of Ramona Avenue to match the existing improvements north and south thereof, as well as the reconstruction of f: dlPOnd Avenue to provide a new parabolic street cross-sectlnn will serve to direct surface runoff (nuisance water) and flood waters away from the street travel lanes towards the concrete curb and gutter. That section of Ramona Avenue to De widened will serve to provide a wider cross-sectional width far retention of water flooding within Ramona Avenue and the contraction of new sidewalk along the east side of Ramona Avenue where none presently exists will provide a safe route for pedestrian traffic. 6. Socio-Economic Factors P roiect cns tc are onus ranly ei <r.i n~~ted _„ ~. V.icct beneficiaries Lh rough the implementation Hof Systems Deveiopment Fees. 8. Transportation a,b, During the course of Ramona Avenue reconstruction, traffic e d g will increase on surrounding streets along the project perimeter. After the completion of said improvements, traffic movement will return to Ramona Avenue. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods during construction can be mitigated by the prcper use of roadway warning and detour signing. Likewise, increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians during construction can be mitigated by said roadway .arning and detour signing. l9~ 10. Health, Safety and Nuisance Factors Local noise ievels will increase during construction on Ramona Avenue. These noise levels can be ml ti gated by restricting the hours of operation of heavy equipment and the installation of noise attenuators on said equipment. 12. Utilities and Public Services d 8 e This protect may require alterations to water and waste water facilities in the form of grade a4iustments of water valve and sever manhole covers. This protect may require the relocation of a water meter and bcx behind the proposed curb improvements. This impact can be mitigated by prior notification to the respective water company and property owner of a temporary break in service. h 8 i This protect mqy also leave an interim effect on the present P'ttern of circulation of vehicles (e.g. police and fire protection). Such circulation pattern impacts in the case of police and fire protection can be mitigated by prior notification to the respective agencies of the proposed street work, giving time, date and duration of said work. This protect will improve existing road surface and subgrade improvements and install new sidewalk and curb 8 gutter improvements. i 93 J~PrENOOC e NOTICE aP PJfEYPT1ON TOs _ Secretary Ear Resourrn FROML uity o° Rancho Cucar~ung;. 1416 Ninth Street, Roan 1111 Engiareri~ig Division Sacramento, GlHomia 95b 14 p,u. 3ox DU7 ~ Canty Clerk Rancno Cucamonga, .;,. ;il30 Cornty of San Oerna ruj nG :rnr,hna:-:.xenuet 5th Flour San ernara no. CA 924,5 ;::I'L1':. ;:'J E'!UE :1dPRLVE!'E4T5 Project Titk R;r~ona „venue uetween Vict *i:. anc .9•di Scr~et~ _ rest ,;;non- peci rc Ci.y of RencLc i.LCarx;nta Scr Jeruot'uiuu t:uw~cv jest Location{ItY I~~K L.ocatian{arty °'E ,.TL.JRED J~Qiption of Nature, lArptre, and fkneflciariea of Project Name o he BMSY ing lest Cix of Rand~u ~LCEfdLll6,a Name of nor Agency Curying Out jest Exempt tatus: eck One _ 6linisterial (Sec. 13073) _ fkclared Emergency (Sec. 13071 (a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 13071 (b) and (d) ~_ Caugorical Exemption. State type and section number. o't~ae .y, Mass .(c) ,Sx ~i er. 'e 53U. cf ti,e ;~l ifci•n iu Envi roecia rit~l ~LSii„ „r.) Reasons why project is exempt: niCLC'.'i, l,~ti 7:v :J - w2 32v Con[at[ Person Area Coe ele one Extension It til by applicant: ! Attach certitied document of exemption finding. Z~ Hasa ~4Vte of exemotim Gem filed 6y the public agency aoorovin¢ the project? Yes _ No Date Reserved for Filing ~r 19/,7 igrature :.i~~ Efci~~oer itle 30l / ^`/ NOTICE OF E%EMPTION ATTACHMENT Protect Descrlption:_ The protect involves removal and rehabilitation of ex s ng ro~ement and minimal widening of the east side of Ramona Avenue 1n order to complete curb and gutter and sidewalk iaptrovements to match existing improvements. Protect Beneficiaries: The primary beneficiaries of the project will be the re~~~ oT- ne boyhood in which the street is located. Secondary beneficiaries will be the vehicular and pedestrian traffic that employ Ramona Avenue as their pattern of circulation. /~j5 RESOLUTION N0. ~~/ q'~v A RESOLUTION ~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED RAMONA AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS BETNEEN VICTORIA AND 19TH STREETS NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Ramona Avenue Improvements; and NHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and NON, THEREFORE, BE tT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Environmen a ssessment Initial Study and Issuances of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Ramona Avenue Improvements. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to f71e a Notice of Exemption pursuant the California Environmental puality Act. / `~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA o~~o'~c STAFF REPORT ~~ ~y ~- DATE: Rugust 19, 1987 gip, z F„ ~ z T0: City Council and City Manager ,_ ._ > IB77 FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY; Lucinda E. Hackett, Asst. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 2 aitll L.D. King, Incorporated, for design revisions and changes for the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and Street Improvement Project in an amount of 53,100.00, the original Agreement was dated April 3, 1986. RECO1liJIDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Contract Change Order Nc. 2 with L.D. King in an amount of 53,100.00 for design revisions and changes on the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and Street improvement Prnject. Background/Analysis The attached Change Order No. 2 for L.D. King is for revisions to the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route Storm Drain and Street Improvement plans wm cn Inc iuae the aaattlon or slaewalRS, arlveways ana frontage improvements at Tract 12895, and revisions due to utility undergrounding and right-of-way changes. The original Professional Services agreement dated April 3, 1986, was for and amount of 575,500,00, The total contract including this and previous Change Order No. 1 will be 583,600.00 Respectfully submitted, v CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: August 10, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager From: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Subject: Development of West Beryl Park Recommendation: Gi%~'HC,~ ZC~~ 7n 19 i' i r :. R 2 D That the City Council authorize Community Services Department to seek professional design services to develop West Heryl Park construction documents. Backoround• The expansior. of Beryl Park, West to Carnelian Street, will provide approximately 10 acres of new park land. Through a series of community input meetings, a conceptual plan was developed and approved by City Council on August 20, 1986. (See attached.) The current City budget allocates $850,000.00 from the park development fund to engineer and construct the facility. Selection of a professional design firm will be the first step in the process to develop the park and will provide working drawings and bid documents. /~O _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~• 4R I~ _ ,y ~ .ye ` - ~ ~ ~ _: u / ~ ~ Y " ~ l~ ~ 5 ' ,• c ~/ ~~, i'1 ~i' ~`~ 133tl1c ryes :y rytlfJ ~• ~ ~. '~ 1 o s '_ r- I~ L• ft G U [D 0 `< J C~~ `'Jl/ZI ~` i ~~// f.` ~~ _` %~ j ~~1.j ~_ ~~ -~I r~ ~~~, - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA `~unl0 STAFF REPORT ~ ?i <' ~. = ~ 'i ~F F ~ Z DATE: August 19, 1987 _ ^~ 19;; TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AZCP Community Development Director BY. Olen Jones , Redevelopment Analyst SOBJECT: Approval of an Agreement for Cooperation Between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the ChafEey Joint Union High School District. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement for Cooperation with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and [he ChaEEey Joint Union High School District. BACKGROUND: P.t the Ci[y Council meeting on June 17, 1987, the Council approved a Memorandum of Understanding with the ChafEey Joint Union High School District which outlined the terms of the mitigation of financial impact of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment on the District. Based on the terms of [hat Memorandum of Understanding, the attached Agreement was developed. rverc. m~.n a««anhnA Lnrncmnnt fnr rnnperAtlO^ details the terms of the mitigation of financial impact of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment on the ChafEey Joint Union High School District. These terms are consistent with the Agency approved Memorandum of Understanding. Ail pledged payments are explicitly subcrdinated to any existing or Future Agency bonded indebtedness, and thus will not affect the Agency's ability to sell bonds. The agreement also stipulates that the terms of this settlement Fully mitigate any impact of the Redevelopment Plan upon the District. Resp ctfuil~s mitted, ,lack Lam, AICP j Community Development Director COPY AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION BETNEEN TAE AANCAO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TAE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. PARTIES AND DATE. 1.1 This Agreement entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this day of August, 1987, between the CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public school district ("District"), the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body ("Agency") and the CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City"). 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Agency is presently undertaking a program undez the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seg.)" for the redevelopment, replanning and redesign of certain noncontiguous and blight- ed areas within the City with stagnant, improperly utilized and unproductive land known as the Rancho Redevelopment Project (the "Project") and requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Ordinance No. 166 adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, nn December ?3, 1981, which duthoc- • All subsequent references, unless otherwise noted, are to the California Health a Safety Code. aD 1 area within the t ho Cucamonga by proposed the ad ,t") to the Redevelt s an affected tax. .on services and oy .litiea which are rea or the immediat rea is located. Di s levied on its be` X11 or any portion Ln fiscal year 1986 ornia Community Rei Sections »vv6, ec s to pay to any ta: i a project area oth the project, any determination is app ien or detriment tai lent project. has previously su ad findings regardin impacts and City and -2- JU ~' determined that the Project may cause Financial burden or detriment as defined by Section 33012 to District, 2.6 District and Agency wish to enter into an Agreement between themselves to provide mutual aid and assistance in the redevelopment of certain areas of City through the construction, reconstruction and rehabilitation of public school facilities in order to facilitate rede- velopment within City and to further provide for the cooper- ation of District and Agency in carrying out redevelopment activities and otherwise alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to District by the Project. 2.7 District and Agency recognize the need to provide adequate public school facilities to serve the Project and have determined that such facilities are of primary benefit to the Project and the immediate neighbor- nooc rn wnicn the project is located and that there are no other reasonable means of financing such public school facilities. 2.8 Agency has found and determined that it would be appropriate to alleviate financial burden or detri- ment caused to District by the Project, if any, by assisting District with money to construct, reconstruct and rehabili- tate public school facilities which are of primary benefit to the Project and by otherwise assisting in the financing of District's facilities which may he of primary benefit to Agency's Project. -3- ~C3 NOW, TREREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the patties hereto agree as Follows: 3. TERMS. 3.1 Definitions. "Agency" shall mean the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. "City" shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation. "County" shall mean the County of San Bernardino, a political subdivision of the State of California. "District" shall mean the Chaffey Joint Union High School District, a body corporate and agency of the State of California. "v<ujec c'` and °rrolect Area^ shall mean the specific redevelopment project area and redevelopment acti- vities described in the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project Of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, as amended. 3.2 Funding of Projects for District's Benefit. On or be Eore June 30, 1990, Agency shall pay to District not less than One Million Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,050,000). Such Funds shall be deposited by Agency in its Special Fund, shall be designated "Chaffey Joint Union High School Fund" (the "Chaffey School Fund") and shall be -4- U used by Agency upon District's request to pay the principal of and interest on loans, money advanced tc, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by Agency or District, with Agency's consent, to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the following District projects: (a) The construction of a tennis court at Eti wands High School; and (b) The construction of a swimming pool at Etiwanda High School. On or before June 30, 1994, Agency shall pay to District not less than One Million Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,050,000). Such funds shall be deposited by Agency in its Special Fund, shall be designated "ChaEfey Joint Union High School Fund" (the "Chat fey School Fund") and shall be uaeu oy nyeucy upon uiscricc~s request to pay the pn ncipal of and interest on loans, money advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by Agency or District, with Agency's consent, to Finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the following District projects: (a) The construction of a tennis court at Rancho Cucamonga High School; and (b) The construction of a swimming pool at Rancho Cucamonga High School. -5- ~US On or before June 30, 1996, Agency shall pay to District not less than One Million Three Rundred Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($1,375,000?. Such funds shall be deposited by Agency in its Special Fund, shall be designated "Chaffey Joint Union High School Fund" (the "Chaffey School Fund"j and shall be used by Agency upon District's request to pay the principal of and interest on loans, money advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by Agency or District, with Agency's consent, to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the following District projects: (a) The construction of bleachers at Rancho Cucamonga High School. Such funds may be commingled with such other funds as may be deposited by Agency in its Special Fund. In each tiscal year thereof tec, such Eunds as may remain on deposit shall continue to be used for the purposes set forth herein so long as any such funds cemain on deposit in the Fund. 3.3 Allocation of Special Taxes. District shall be allocated, in addition to the portion of taxes allocated pursuant to Subdivision (a) of Section 33670 and Section 7.7 of this Agreement, all or any portion of the tax revenues allocated to Agency pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 33670 attributable to increases in the rate of tax imposed for the benefit of District, which levy occurs after -6- ~~ ~ ~ the tax year in which the ordinance adopting the redevelop- ment plan becomes effective. 3.4 Alternative Uses Of Funds. District's facilities and projects otherwise required to be funded by this Agreement may be modified in whole or part by the Agency upon request of the District, if otherwise permitted by law. 3.5 Subordination of Agency Obliga lions. The indebtedness of the Agency under this Agreement shall be deemed not to be a first pledge of Tax Increment received by the Agency pursuant to Section 33670(b). The indebtedness of the Agency under this Agreement shall be subordinate to any existing or future pledge of Tax Increment to bond- holders or the holders of other instruments of indebtedness; provided, however, the Agency agrees not to incur indebted- ness wnen rt is reasonably foreseeable that such indebted- ness will impair its obligations to district hereunder. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give the District the right to approve Agency indebtedness. 3.6 Taxes to Be Used for Purposes of Bealth s Safety Code Section 33334.2. Tax Increment collected for and allocated to District under the terms of this Agreement shall be net of those funds deducted for purposes of comply- ing with Section 73334.2. District's portion of the tax increment allocated to Agency shall constitute a receipt of Tax Increment by Agency for the purposes of California -7- .~C)~ Health & Safety Code Section 33334.2 and appropriate por- tions of such funds shall be deposited in Agency's Low - and Moderate-Income Rousing Fund Eor purposes of complying with California Health & Safety Code Section 33334.2. 3.7 Term. This Agreement shall become effec- tive upon the effective date of the ordinance adopting Amendment No. 1 to the Project. In the event the Amendment ]oes not become effective for any reason whatsoever, this Agreement shall not become effective unless and until such Amendment becomes effective. All rights and obligations under the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall terminate when the Agency's right to claim and receive tax increment pursuant to Section 33670(b) ceases. 3.8 Modification and Termination. If after this Agreement is executed, State enacts laws or policies in COnflirt with air --- -• aci yxi. L;uu uc cnis Agreement, Agency and District may mutually agree to excuse performance of all or any portion of this Agreement by Agency or District. In the event any section or portion of this Agreement shall be held, found or determined to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason whatsoever, the remaining provisions shall remain in effect, and the parties hereto shall take further actions as may be reasonably necessary and availahle to them to effectuate the intent of the parties as to all provisions set forth in this Agreement. In the event the Amendment does not become effective Eor any reason whatsoever, or in -S- 3 Q o the event the Amendment is held, found or determined to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason whatsoever, this Agreement shall terminate automatically. 3.9 Mutual Assistance and Community Use of Facilities. District will support the Amendment and will assist the Agency in the planning, financing, acquisition, construction and maintenance or operation of redevelopment activities undertaken by Agency under this Agreement within District in accordance with applicable state and federal law. District and Agency shall supply to one another such information and reports as from time to time either may require to undertake theic respective obligations. District and Agency shall cooperate fully, wherever possible, in making the facilities financed under the terms and condi- tions of thus Agreement community facilities fully available for use by all residents of the City. The City will provide agreed-upon high priority use of the City auditorium to be built at Central Park 6y the end of fiscal year 1997-98 for both Rancho Cucamonga High School and Etiwanda High School use, and District shall cooperate fully with City's Community Services Department to prepare an annual schedule of events for use of the auditorium at the beginning of each srhooi year following the construction of the auditorium. -9- ao9 3.10 Settlement and Release. By this Agree- ment, the parties intend to resolve all differences with respect to the Redevelopment Plan, the Amendment and the Project. Therefore, upon execution of this Agreement, District shall forthwith withdraw any and all objections to and any and all legal proceedings relating to the validity of the Amendment and/or proceedings incident thereto and shall continue so long as this Agreement is effective to refrain from objecting to and commencing any and all legal proceedings relative to the validity of the Amendment and/or proceedings incident thereto. District, and each and all of its individual and collective agents, representatives, attorneys, princi- pals, predecessors, successors, assigns, administrators, executors, heirs, and beneficiaries, hereby release and discharge Agency and City, and each and all of Agency's and City's agents, representatives, attorneys, principals, pre- decessors, successors, and assigns, and each of them, from any and all obligations, liabilities, claims, costs, expen- ses, demands, debts, controversies, damages, causes of action, which any of them now have, or might hereafter have, by reason of any matter or thing arising out of or in any way relating to the Redevelopment Plan, the Amendment and the Project. -10- ~/~ District recognizes that it is the intent of Agency and City in entering into this Agreement, to resolve all claims, litigation, disputes and controversies that Dis- trict, and each and all of its individual and collective agents, representatives, attorneys, principals, predeces- sors, successors, assigns, administrators, executors, heirs, and beneficiaries, may have relating to or arising out of the Redevelopment Plan, the Amendment and the Project and District on behalf of itself and the aforementioned persons and entities, warrant and represent as follows: 1. Neither District, and each and all of its individual and collective agents, representatives, attorneys, principals, predecessors, successors, assigns, admi ri strators, executors, heirs, and beneficiaries, have any intention of asserting any claims or Filing any lawsuits against Agency and City in connection with the Redevelopment Plan, the Amendment and the Project; and 2. District and each artd all of its individual and collective agents, representatives, attor- neys, principals, predecessors, successors, assigns, admi- nistrators, executors, heirs and beneficiaries, have not assigned any right, title, or interest in or to any claim or cause c. action which may nresenkiy exist oc may have exls- Ced in the past, or may exist in the future against Agency or City or its assigns and related and affiliated persons and entities. -ll- ~// District represents and warrants that in agreeing to the terms of this Agreement it has read the Agreement, it has had the Agreement explained to it by Dis- trict's counsel, it is aware of the content and legal effect of this Agreement, it is acting on the advice of District's counsel and it is not relying on any representation made by Agency or City, or any of the employees, agents, represen- tatives oc attorneys of Agency or City, or any of them, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. District, on behalf of itself and each and all of their individual and collective agents, representatives, attorneys, principals, predecessors, successors, assigns, administrators, executors, heirs, and benef iciariea, agree and covenant not to enter into any lawsuit which is based on any claims released or resolved by this Agreement, or is in derogation of this Agreement. District hereby agrees to indemnify Agency and City and save and hold Agency and City harmless from and against damages (which term shall mean actual cash expendi- tures arising out of, resulting from or related to any damage, liability, loss, cost or deficiency, including but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees and other costs and expenses Incident to prpgcodings or investigations ,,. the defense of any claim) incurred by Agency or City arising out of, resulting Erom or relating to: -12- ~' (i) Any inaccuracy in the representation or the breach of any warranty of District under this Agree- ment; and (ii) Any failure of District to duly perform and observe any term, provision, covenant or agree- ment to be performed or observed by District pursuant to this Agreement. Agency and City hereby agree to indemnify Dis- trict and save and hold District harmless from and against damages (which term shall mean actual cash expenditures arising out of, resulting from or related to any damage, liability, 1099, coat or deficiency, including but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees and other costs and expenses incident to proceedings or investigations or the defense of any claim) incurred by District arising out of, resulting Erom or relating to: (i) Any inaccuracy in the representation or the breach of any warranty of Agency or City under this Agreement; and (ii) Any failure of Agency or City to duly perform and observe any term, provision, covenant or agreement to be performed or observed by Agency or City pur- suant to this Agreement. District, City or Agency acknowledge that they have been advised by their attorneys concerning, and are -13- ~~/ 3 familiar with, the provisions of California Civil Code Sec- tion 1542, which provides as follows: "A General release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affec- ted his settlement with the debtor." DATED: August _, 1987 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT ATTEST: Press ent Secretary DATED: August _, 1987 RANCHO CUCAMONCA REDEVEIAPMENT AGENCY ATT F.FT~ Chairman Secretary DATED: August _, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor -14- JEB0463 ~/ CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, Gi ty Planner 8Y: Scott Murphy, As satiate Planner `'`cnn'°Hc ~~ y ~ ~~. ~r iia (- ~ 2 9 I9-- SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13476 - - ppea o e amm~g ommission s ecis on requiring the preservation of an existfng Magnolia tree, the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities, and the construction of finish floor elevations along Hellman Avenue above tlx 100 year flood level for a residential tract subdivision of 37 single family lots on 9.7 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - APN 208-111-04. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be set for public Baring on a September 2, 1987 City Council agenda. II. BACKGROUIID: On June 10, 1987, the Planning Commission unanimousiv approved Tentative Tract 13476. As part of the approval far the tract, conditions consistent with City standards and policies were imposed. Three of those conditions are now being appealed by the applicant. These conditions include the following: 1. Preserve the Magnolia tree on Lot 13. The house shall be plotted accordingly. The tree shall be protected during construction per Municipal Code Section L9.08.110. The tree shall be carefully pruned and maintained per the January 26, 1987 report from Richard P. Johnson and in accordance with proper arborfcal practices. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electricall on the project side of H211man Avenue shall ne underyrounded from the first pcle c :he south ;ide of Tryon Street to the first pole off-site north of Lhe north project boundary prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it o, :urs on the opposite side of the street is not feasible because the property is presently developed. ~J~/ . CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENTATIYE TRACT 13476 August 19, 1987 Page 2 3. The finish floor elevations for those lots located on Hellman Avenue shall be above the 100 year flood level as determined by the final drainage/flood study. Resp fully su ~tted, er City an BB:SM: to ~~ nTmv nc+ o ~ unvn nrrn ~ arnwrn ~ STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner 7 ~' oi, z ~!I a ~i _ 's 19'i SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD .,r~..,rw r~nn nnu ucncnn~ r~nn menunen~ ai-urn - io rev7ew an cons er a reconmaen a an or cer ca on of the Draft Environment Impact Report for the Foothill Specific P1 an and General Plan Amendment 87-03B Project. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the t-15 Freeway and East Avenue. t. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests a public hearing before the City ounc on ep ember 2, 1987. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Environmental Impact Report analyzes and proposes m ga on measures for impacts which may result from the Foothill SDeclfic Plan. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for development on properties ' any FJuGi~il Guuievm u uelween ~ruve avenue and Haven Avenue, and between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. III. PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING: On August 26, 1987, the Planning omm ss~on w e rev ew ng the draft EIR, which has been formulated by the protect consultant and staff. qt this upcoming meeting, after taking testimony, it is anticipated that the Planning Cdamission will recommend certification of the draft document. Respe fully s fitted, Brad B le „'ty~7larner BB:AW:ko ~~ 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Councii FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Narren, Associate Planner c~MO,~ .dP ~ r'~', ~~~ FI Lx ~D 197] SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87-U2 - GITT DF RANGHO GUGAMUTAiA - An amen411e0L vo remove rom a wan a pec c an approximately 57 acres of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue; approximately 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and approximately 14 acres of land on the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24, 25 and 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 and 22-27, APN 227-231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 and 34, APN 229-311-14 and 15, APN 229-D41-01, and portions of APN 227-231-16 and 23. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests a public hearing be set before the y ounc on September 2, 1987 ii. rnwwT uE,~.nliTivri: v~ ~D"• -- e ween e - reeway and East`AvenueVis currently regulated by the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP). In anticipation of adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, these properties along Foothill Boulevard should be deleted from the Etiwanda Specific Plan to avoid overlapping development regulations. i II. PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING: On July 22, 1987, the Planning omm ss on recamnen a approva of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 81-02, as a result of their recommendation for adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This item is brought before the City Council in anticipation of the Council's adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan. Res pegtfully subyii tted, ~~ '~ i B B le City anner BB:AW:ko ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Narren, Associate Planner c~'~^^+o,~~ ~'~ o^ °l,l .Z F^i > 19" SU&1 ECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENUMtNi H/-U1 - l:I7T OF NANI:NU I:UCAMUNIaA - Aft amen0lAenL LO remove rom e n us r a pec c an approximately 80 acres of land an the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229-031-01, 16 and 20 and portions of 229-021-57 and 59. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests a public hearing be set before the y ounc on September 2, 1987. It. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A portion of the Foothill Boulevard SDecific an on a sau side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue is currently regulated by the Industrial Area SDecific Plan (ISP). In anticipatlon of adoption of the Footh711 Boulevard Specific Plan, the industrial land along c,.,.~n+11 pnir1n 'd -''-"',~ tC d2 ;' cJ .. (nu iiie i.iP in order [o overlapping developmentregulations. III. PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING: On July 22, 1987, the Planning omm ss on recaamen a approva of ISP Amendment 87-01 as a result of their recommendation of approval for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This item is brought before the City Council at this time in anticipation of the Council's adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Respe ul ly submi-t.4ed, /f ~ , Bra u er /I_1 t_V VIA_11110n , / .. BB:AN:ko ~/9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Marren, Associate Planner 7977 SU&IECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-038 - - reques o amen a an se p o e enera an o reflect land use changes proposed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests a public hearing be set before the y~un~T on September 2, 1987. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A request the Land Use Nap of the General an ore ec an use changes proposed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as follows: Comaercial to Office for 8.45 acres on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-011-43 and 44. 2. Office to Commercial for: a. Approximately 3 acres on the northeast corner of Red Hill Country Club Drive and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-113-01, 10; b. Approximately 3.5 acres on the southwest corner of Carnelian gvenue and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-102- 03, O5, 08, 09, 12 and 19; c. Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner of Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24, 25 and 27; and J. Approximately 5 acres on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229-311-14 and 15. 3. Medium Residential to Commercial for: a. Approximately 11 acres on the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - portions of APN 208-321- 23 and 24; ,p ~vca"'°'~ `C Y ~ 7 ~~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 87-038 August 19, 1987 Page 2 b. Approximately 7.5 acres, 175 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227- 201-08 and 22, and portions of APN 227-201-07; and c. Approximately 5.5 acres, 500 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of East Avenue - portions of APN 227-23-23. 4. Low Residential to Commercial for approximately 9 acres, 300 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the east side of Turner Avenue - ApN 1077-601-08 and 10, and portions of APN 1077- 601-02 and 04. 5. Industrial Park to Commercial for approximately 37 acres on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229-031-03-13 and 20. 6. To aQiust the line between Medium Residential and Commercial in the block bordered by Foothill Boulevard, San Bernardino Road, Nellman Avenue and Klusman Avenue (see exhibit). Division line as shown 1s approximate. Precise location of land use divisions to be determined through the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan. TT? olio Dn CC nc rur dlo, r~ ur ~n„~r. _ ... .. ~r~ nuyuat •a, inol, NIC 1.1 Ly ounc w ~ eg~n~~pu ~ c~~ earings on the proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. In anticipation of the City Council approval of this document, the required General Plan AmenAaents need to be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to enactment of the Specific Plan. The hearings for the General Plan Amendment and Specific Ptan will be ready for City Council action on the September 2, 1987 meeting. Resp u11y submitted, B City P anner BB:AW:ko a al nimv nc n n winvn tiro n xxnwrn ~ STAFF REPORT < DATE: August 19,1987 F':~!, ~ ~il: T0: City Council and City Manager tv%% PROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Jugy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Parcel Map 9504 located on the Northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue (Terra Vfsta) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation No. 6 and setting the date of public hearing for September 16, 1987 RECOMIFMDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approviing the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 6 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described Parcel Map to Street Lighting Maintenance District no. 4. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex Parcel Map 9504 to Street Lighting Maintenance District .:o. » as nmiexacion o anc setting the puo n c hearing date for September 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the subJect annexation. Respectfully submitted, U T7 .H., ~ G3~ .5~~,.t„ ' RHM:JAA:dIw Attachments as ~- RESOLUTION N0. ~~'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 NHEREAS, on August 19, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemtzed costs and expenses o~ s~i3-work and of Lhe incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report De, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc~~in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa~d'~sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 4+, ~a3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION N0. 6 to STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community PARCEL MAP 9$04 Valencia Avenue right-of-way (south and west half) from Haven Avenue to Base Line Road SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1982). SECTION 2. General Description Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") provides for upe ration, servicing, and maintenance of street lights on local and coliec for streets and secondary arterials (except Church Street) in the Terra Vista Planned Community. All residential developments in Terra Vista are to be nno ad ,n +hc n:~a ri r, n~ M n~A: nn nro Nn ton. ~.., ..~.:..od a v mine na _ eon e. an _ ,.,~, which lie outside residential developments are also to be annexed for mainte- nznre purposes. This Annexation No. 6 annexes to the District the following area: o Valencia Avenue right-of-way (south and west half) from Haven Avenue to Base Line Road SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications the plans and specifications far street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and specifications are as stipulated in the con- ditiors of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. rir (vrNmN i~ hN rr?hy made to nc~ a~bia rt tram ma_pc nr ~PVP1npmOnT niaag and the assessment diagrams for the enact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvements are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting construction. All imprr vemen is will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estima tetl tho'. maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as set forth below. These costs are estimated only; actual assessments will he based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost fo r Annexation No. 6 is as follows based on high pressure sodium vapor lamps: 5,800 9,500 16,000 27,500 lumens Lumens Lumens Lumens Valencia Avenue right-of-way 3 0 4 0 Total lights SCE monthly rate, ma int. and energy Months per year Totals TOTAL ANNUAL COST x 88.93 x 810.16 x $11.73 x $15.31 x 12 x 12 x 12 x 12 q 321 $ 0 $ 563 $ 0 $ 884 The estimated total annual maintenance cost, and estimated annual assessments, for the District after Annexation No. 6 are as follows: Existing Annexation New total District No. 6 for District To tat estimated annual IIIQ III LCIIO II I.C Ll1~L Assessment units:~1~ I per single family dwelling unit 0.5 per multifartiily dwelling unit 5wa ,3io ~ uav 549,2bC l,l4o D l,lao 506 0 506 1,646 0 1,646 Assessment rate: Total Cost ~ Assessment Units = Assessment per Assessment Unit Annually 529.39 529.93 111 COITlpu led frlilil eii nla ps recorded as or" ij 2ij b7. Asessment shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in Section 6. StS TION 5. Annexation Diagram A copy of the proposed annexation area is attached to this report and by this reference is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. - 2 - SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accordance with the following relationship: Land Use Assessment Units Single family residential dwelling 1 unit Multifamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Council holds a public hearing rn June to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the prior fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing dates. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4, Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council, 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. CF:kr:917SL 073187 -3- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 ANNEXATION NO. b v~ ~~~ k4 ~~ VALENCIA aJC ~I ~ ~ Yd ~ x a TERRA VISTA VILLAGE m ~I P.M. 9504 'W~ J a s • it BASE LINE ROAD w> J ~-Ib,aac l~ntng ¢¢ `,,q:``^"Ol:, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ,~ ~~~~ ~ T COUNTY OF 8AN B1:RNARDINO y °~;~~ i STATE OF CALIFORNIA - N m ~ RESOLUT [CN N0. Q ~' ! ~~ A RESOL UII CN OF THE CITY COLE CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON G4, CALIFORN IR DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNExATi ON TO STREET LIGHTING MIINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4, AN ASSESSMENT OISTRI CT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS gNNEXATI ON N0. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING M4INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 ANO OFFERING A TIME ANO PIA CE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE 8E IT RE SOLOED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being pivision 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require an i is a in en ion of this Ciiy Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in Connection with said di Strict. S'cCTi Q7 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to Se located wit iTFin roadway rig t-o -way en caner ated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the nffi ro of tha rite rln~4 untitlad "a nnavatinn Nn fi to Ctront tin_htinn_ Maintenance District No. 4". S ECT[CN 3. Des cri tion of Assessment District: That the co nt empl ate wo~in the opinion o sai ity ounn is o more than local or ordinary public 6enef it, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and whi cit district is described as follows: All that certain territory of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of ~tlill i.l i. V. SECTION 4, Re ort of En ineer: The City Council of said City by Resolutions Naas approve t e report of the engineer of work which report ~ndi cotes the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, rise ;sment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Ligh ti g Maintenance District No, 4" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the as; es sments and for the extent of the work. ~~~ SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at t e same t me and n the same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Councii will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year wilt be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of He~ari_ng: Notice is hereby given that on Sep etenb r~~f997, at t~ieTiour o{7:3D pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or whY said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must 6e delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer 1s the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and L1 htln Act of 1972: All the work herein proposed s all be done and carr a throw n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated Lhe Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Pubiication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuant to ect on o t e vernment Code. The Nayor '`' si y.. this "25Gluti mi uuJ Li,e ~iy ~ieri, aiiaii aiixsL i.u u,e same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set far the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~+~ ~~~ n~mv n STAFF REPORT ~~'~~ ,~~~ ~I ;; i, DATE: qugust 19, 1981 ~~ r0 I9.' T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 3Y: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engiceering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Parcel Map 9504 located on the Northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven (Terra Vista) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation No. 6 and setting the date of public hearing for September 16, 1987 RECOMEND11TIp1 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutfons approving the Engineer's Report far Annexation No. 6 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described parcel map to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. Analysis/Background Attached far City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's IIIL CnL LU GIIICh YUI LCI I'I UI/ JJV7 LV LUIIVJLUIIC IIUII~4CI~Ui~~.C V ~ I for Annexation No. 6 and setting the public he ar i~ng date for September 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation, ?es pe ctf ully submitted, ~~u ~rr,r ~.~ RHM:JA:d1w Attachments ago 5 RESOLUT [ON N0. ~~~~~ R RESOLUTIpI OF THE CITY COINCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO LANDSCAPE MA INTERAN CE DISTRICT N0. 4 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of safd City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficfent, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE 6E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTI01 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itani zed costs and expenses odd work and of the incidental expensas in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the di agr an showing the Assessment District referred to and des cr a in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECT ION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sar ss es sment Oist ri ct in proportion to the estimated 6enef it to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and conf finned. SECTI0'1 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fo~F purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. ail CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNE%.4TION N0. 6 to LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community PARCEL MAP 9504 Eastern half of Haven Avenue median from Base Line Road to Valencia Avenue. SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1982). SECTION 2. General Description Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") maintains street plantings, parks, trails, and similar areas throughout the Terra Vista Planned Conmunity. All residential developments in Terra Vista are to be annexed to the District pursuant to Ordinance No. 190; areas to be maintained which lie outside residential develcpments are also to be annexed for maintenance purposes. This Annexation No. 6 annexes to the District the following area: o Eastern half of median planting in Haven Avenue from 8a se Line Road to Valencia Avenue All landscaped areas to 6e maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the tract maps (nr by separate instrument) as roadway right-of-way, dedica- tions, o° easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping within residential tracts have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part of Lhe improvement plans for those tracts. The plans and specifications are in r.nr~fn rma nce with the Planning Commission conditions of approval, Plans and soecifi cations for landsca oed areas outside residential tracts have been separarP'~,v prepared by the deveioper. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the. as=_essment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and spa~ifications by reference are hereby made a part of this rr port to the same ex"ent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs wi it be incurred for construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis, and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assess- ment purposes will be as set forth below. These costs are estimated only; actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation No. 6 is as follows: Trails & 1 Street2 Parkways Oreenways medians Trees Haven Avenue median 6,130 Total areas (square feet) 6,130 Unit Lost (annual) per per 1st per per sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. tree Totals S 919 TOTAL ANNUAL COST $ 919 1Half width median in Haven Avenue, 2Loca1 street trees only. The estimated total annual maintenance cost, and estimated annual assessments, for the District after Annexation No. 6 are as follows: Existing Annexation New total District No. 6 for District Total estimated annual maintenance cost 5197,46G 4 919 5198,379 (1) Assessment units: 1 per single family dwelling unit 1.i4G G i ncr mu_itifamiiv ~ dwellinq unit 506 D I ; 6'4b -6 Assessment Rate: Total Cost + Assessment Units Assessment per Assessment Unit Annually 5119.96 4120.52 ~1)Compu ted front all maps recorded as of 7/27/87. 2 - Assessment shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in Section 6. SECTION 5. Annexation Diagram A copy of the proposed annexation diagram is attached to this report. By this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accor- dance with the following relationship: Land Use Assessment Units in2'-T~amily residential dwelling unit Multifamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Council holds a public hearing in June to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the prior fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing dates. 3. City Council conducts Dublic hearing, considers all testimony and deter- mines to annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. CF:kr:917LM 073187 v , ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ~} ANNExATION N0. b ~~~ 4~ ~~ ~~ VALENCIA 5~ D x v~ e ~ xl W~ TERRA VISTA VILLAGE P.M. 9504 =~~ ~ BASE LINE gOAD - E~,krn e„cl~, if of A+W.n •rd+n= 6,HOS4. a e z C ~i~ w~ ~y` °'~, CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAhIONGA ~r/~~ `. ' ENGINEERING DIVISION ~~.~' VICINIT'Y M.1P `;~ N RESIX.UTION N0. g ? ' ~~ A RES IX.UfI Qi OF THE CITY CO LN CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC4 MON G4, CALIFORNIA DE CLA R[NG ITS INTENTIM TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: OESIQIA TING SAID ANNEXA TI OV AS ANNEXATION N0. 6 TO LAN OSCAPE M1INTENAN CE DISTRICT N0, 4; PURSl14NT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME ANO PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RE SOI.V ED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanon ga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Oivi si on 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION i, Des cri tion of Work: That the public interest and c~nveniencece require an tt is t e tntenttor, of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SE CTi ON 2, Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located with n roadway rt g' o1• way and landscaping eas enenis of Landscape Maintenance Oistri ct No. 4 en user ated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the L ity LJ er x, eon tied "A nnexatton No. o to Landscape Mat nt en ante Utstrtdt No. 1". SECTION 3, Oescri tion of Assessment Oistri ct: That the coot enpl ate wor to the opt nto~ sai tt~y~i~f more than local or ordinary ou blic benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho C uc anon ga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4" heretofore aopr oved by the City fnuncil of said City by Resoiution no. indicating by said oo un dory lines the extent of 'the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report~vf E~~ngineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * has approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, gnnexat ion No. 6, Landscape !!ainten v,ce District No. 4" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amour' and extent of the assessments aand3for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collecte a~same rme an rn t e smne manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined, SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Sept em eb~6-I98 at a your o p. m. in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any obj ecticns to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearf ng, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all 5e~one an carr e t i~roug~in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECT IQi 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be m-~ursuan o c ion o e overrment Cade. The Mayor oilail ai yil Luis 11 ClUIULI VO and Lne Lliy Lerx Sndll attest to Lne salAe, ono the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Mari o, ~Ti~rni a, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. y+, ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 i0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide pi~Mp ~~?. ~'A ~~J ~ liz .~ ~> 19i: SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 12671-1, 12671-2,12671-3, and 12671-4 (Terra Vista) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation No. 7 and setting the date of public hearing for September 16, 1987 RECONENB11T1011 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 1 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4, Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12611-3 and 12671-4 fTarra vestal to Street lighting Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation 1 and setting the public hearing date for September 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution givf ng preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation, Resoectf idly submitted, RHM:JAA:ma Attachments ~J RESOLUTION N0. ~ /'~ J~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGq, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPGRT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE 8E IT RESOLVED by Lhe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION is That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~work and of the Sncfdental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily annrnvaA anA ~nnF:.n,.,A SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described-in said report, the boundaries of the su bdSvisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily aPProved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sar ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for-tie urpos es of all subsequent praceedi ng s, and pursuant to the aroonsed ui~Cri rt ~'` ~~ / CITY Of RANCHO COCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION N0. 7 to STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Vista Plannetl Community Tracts Nos. 12671-1, -2, -3, -4; Milliken Avenue (west half) from Mountain View Drive to north boundary of Tract 126?l; Mountain View Drive (north half) from Milliken Avenue to eastern boundary of Tract 12365 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of grticle 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Lode, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Att of 1982). SECTION 2. General Description Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") provides for operation, servicing, and maintenance of street lights on local and collector streets and secondary arterials (except Church Street) in the Terra Vista Planned Community. All residential developments in Terra Vista are to be ._a .hc n, _.., c. ,_~. .n n.d;nanr> Nn inn; aroaa in ba maintained which lieVoutside residential developments are also to be annexed for mainte- nance purposes. This Annexation No. 1 annexes to the District the following area: o Tracts Nos. 12671-1, -2, -3, -4 o Milliken Avenue (west half) from Mountain View Drive to north boundary of Tract 12671 o Mountain View Drive (north half) from Milliken Avenue to eastern boundary of Tract 1236.° SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications - piano and cperifirdiiun5 fOr' Street ightinu hdY2 been areaared by the developers. The plans and specifications are as stipulated in the con- ditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps or evelopment plans and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications fur street lighting improvements are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and spec+f;rations were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as set forth below. These costs are estimated only; actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation No. 7 is as follows based on high pressure sodium vapor lamps: 5,800 9,500 16,000 27,500 Lumens lumens Lumens Lumens Tracts Nos. 12671-1, -2, -3, 04 26 0 0 0 Milliken Avenue right-of-way 0 3 0 0 Mountain View Drive right- of-way 8 0 0 0 Total lights ~~ ~- -~ ~- SCE monthly rate, maim. and energy x $8.93 x $10.16 x (11.73 x 315.31 Mc nibs per year x 2 .x 12 x 12 x 12 Totals $644 $ 365 $ 0 $ 0 TOTAL ANNUAL COST $ 4,009 the estimated tc tal annual maintenance cost, and estimated annual assessments, for the District after Annexation No. 7 are as follows: Existing Annexation New total District No. 7 for District Total estimated annual maintenance cast $49,262 $ 4,009 $53,271 Assessment units:~l) 1 per single family dwelling un;. i~tgn t2n t~~en 0.5 per multifamily dwelling unit 506 0 506 1, 646 120 1, 766 Assessment rate: Total Cost r Assessment Units Assessment per Assessment Unit Annually E29.93 330.16 (1~ Computed from all maps recorded as of 7/27/87. -2- Asessment shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in Section 6. SECTION 5. Annexation Diagram A copy of the proposed annexation area is attached to this reDOrt and by this reference is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accordance with the following relationship: Land Use Assessment units Single family residential dwelling 1 unit Multifamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Council holds a public hearing in June to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the prior fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. Cf ty Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing dates. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and •L. n:..~..:..• n aLanAnn •Ln n codinnc 4, Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and aap roves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. CF:kr:917SL2 080687 -3- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4. ANNEXATION NO. 7 ~s ~~ ~° e~ o~ ~~~ o° q5 ,q=``~'~0~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(iA y .,., ,.~ :: _ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~~' _, 6 ~ BTATE OF CALIFORNIA m -.__ N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ¢ ANNEXATION NO. 7 COYOTE, CANYON SCHOOL • P.M. 8842 S.F. VILLAGE SERIES TRACT 12671 '~- 9SOO LUMEN$ • SCJOO LUM~N$ a e x C Q1 J J G fit: `-ti~4, .°,- •, Y ,~~ 'N `; im CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1~ONt3A COL7NTY OF SAN BERNARDWO ra ~x;~~~- r; ,~ - 3 ~ - 9- i \ STATE OF CAI.IFORNU ~ T _ ~ the •>IuoM ay; ;o ;ua;xa ay; uo; pue s;uawssasse ay; ;o ;ua;xa pue ;unoum ay; uo; saelno };ued tte uo; apew Fq alay st ;uodau Pees o; aoua ua;ay 'F;}~ ptes ;o ~~at0 6;IO ay; ;o aot;;o ay; ut at}; uo s} „q •oN ;~}35}0 aweua;u}eW but;y6}; ;aal;g `;uodaa s,uaau}6u3„ pat;}; `sauoz ;uawssasse `6uepunoq ;o }u;s }p ay; `;uawssasse pasodeud ay; ;o ;unouQ ay; sa;eo}put ;uodau yotyM >IuoM ;o uaau }6ua ay; ;o ;loda.a ay; pan oudde sey ~ •oN uotlnlo saa 6q 6;IO ptes ;o t}wno0 6;iO ayl :uaaul6u3 do la~ 'b NOI103S 'F3}~ D}es ;o ~lat0 F3}0 ay; ;o ao};;o ay; ut at}; uo s} sdew ..4 'oN 3~}ulst0 aoueua lu }eW 6ut346t1 ;aau;S of L •oN uol;exauuy ;o deW„ u}e;ua~ ;ey; uodn urnoys sau}t A'.lepunoq uo}ua;xa ay; u}y;IM papnt~u} e6uoweon0 o4oueH do F3F~ ay3 eo Fuol}~aa; u}e;~ao ;ey; lltl :motto; se paq }.ao sap st ;~tu;stp ya}yM pue 'SOauayl sasuadxa pue s; soo ay; A'ed o; passasse st 3~F~;stp pees yo}yM `;o}a;s }p a uodn atgea6ueyo worn pees ay3 ;o asuadxa ay; salew 6galay Ilouno0 6;}0 pees ay; pue `;I;auaq a}Ignd 6ueu}puo uo te~ol uey; aaow~o st `t uuno0 F;IO ptes ;o uotu ado ay; u} `>IUOM pa;e ldwa;uoo ay; ;eyl :3o to;s}0 ;uawssasstl ;o uo µ t.ao sa0 'E NOIlU3S •„q •oN ;~ a;s}0 aoueua3u leW but;y6tl ;aau;S o; Z •oN not;exauuy„ pa t3l3ua `l.aa lO A';}0 ay3 ;o ao};;o ay; u} att) uo aue yotyM sdew uo pagtuosap A'tue t~otlued alow pue aaau }6u3 6;I0 ay3 30 3uoda.a ay; u} pa;e uawnua 6ewt-;o-;y61u A'ernp eou uiy;IM paleoot aq o; st >I,aoM pagtaosap 6u}o6auo; ayl ::IuoM bo uo};eool 'Z N01103S '3oku3s}p p}es y3}nt uo};aauuoo ut sa};t LS ae; Pa;e taa pue 6u};y6tt Fue ;o uots lnaadns pue ;soo ay; sapn Lo u! uoµeuado pue a~ueua;utew p}eS •}oauay Z not;oag ut paq uosap ;olulstp aoueua;utew pasadoad ay; ;o sauepunoq ay; s;yb}t ;aau;s asoy; ;o uot;euado pue aoueua;utew ay; .ao; e6uowean0 oyauey ;o ,QIO ay; ut 3ot.alslp aoueua;u}ew e uuo; o; llouno0 n;}~ s}y; ;o uo};ua;ut ay; st 31 pue a,alnbaa aoua}uanuoo pue 3saualut of lgnd ay; 1ey1 :)loop ;o uo }; Iuo seO 'T NOI103S aMOtto; se 'e }ulo;I LeO ~o a;e ;g ay; ;o apo0 sFeny6IH pue s;aa.a;S ay; 30 5I uotstnt0 6utaq `ZC6I }o ;oy but;y6tl pue 6utdeospuel ay; to SU OIS LAOJd ay; o; ;uensund `e6uoum ono oyouey ;o F;tom ay; ;o Il~uno0 F;IO ay; ,Cq 03nlOS3N 11 38 3ilOd3a3H1 'MON 013213H1 SNOI103090 UNI21tl3H a03 30 b'ld ONtl 3W I1 tl UNI i13d d0 UNtl ZL6I 30 13tl ONI1HOIl ONtl ONIdtlOSO NtII 3H1 Ol 1Ntlf1Sa0d ~b 'ON 10Ia1S I0 30NtlN31NI tlW 9NI1HOIl 133i11S O1 L 'ON NOI1tlX3NNtl Stl NOIltl%3NNtl OItlS ONI1 tlN0IS30 a0Ia1510 1N3WSS3S Stl Ntl `b 'ON I:1 IHI SIO 3?NtlN31 N2 tlW 9NIlN91l 13315 O1 NOI1yX 3NNy 3H1 aeuau U1 NO11N31N1 SL1 9NIatllU 30 tlINa03[ltl0 `tFJ NOWtl007 OHONtla 30 Ali? 3H1 d0 1I0N000 A1I0 3H1 d0 NOIlOlOS3a tl ~~~ , I a 'ON NOIlOlOS321 ~h ~' •e}udo;4le~ `e6uoureon~ oyouea ;o F;}~ ay; u} palelnad4o pue `e}udo;4Le~ `o}.aeiuo ;o F;}~ ay3 u} pays4lgnd uoy;elro.a}o ledaua6 ;o dadedsxau ¢ `;d~a~i l4eo ayl u} aauo ;seal ie `6u }.aeay ay; do; ias a;ep ayl a.ao;aq s6ep pT pays4lq nd aq o3 awes ay; asneo lleys Adala F;}~ ay; pue `awes ay; o; ;sa73e lLeys :IdaL~ F34~ ayl pue uo4;nlosaa s}y; u645 lleys doFeN ayl •apo~ luauudanog ayi ;o T96 i9 uo};aaS o; luensdnd spew aq lle ys ao47ou pays}lq nd :uo4qua;ul ;o uo4;nlosaa yo uo}leo}lq nd 'B N011~35 •e }u do;}lei ;o a;elg ay1 ;o apo~ s6eMy64H pue s;aad;; ay; ;o yT uo}s}n 48 6u}aq `ZC6T ;o ;oy 6u};y64y pue 6u4deospue~ ay; pa;eu6}sap e4wo;}lea ;u a;elS ay; ;o adn le is 46al ay; ;o ;oe ue ;o aauensdnd m y6nody; pae.aueo pue auop aq flays pasododd u}aday a.aon a41 llV :dL6T bo-lotl~~!"1 Pue 6u} e~ ospuey •C NOI1~3S •pag4dosap os F;dadodd ay; ;o dauMO ay; s4 dau6l5 yons ;ey; aouaP 4na ua;7}dM Fq pa}uedwoaoe aq do u}e;u oo ;snw lsa;odd yans uay; `slsalodd ay; u} paq Laos ap F;dadodd ay; ;o dauMO ay; se F;uno~ ou }pueuda8 ueS ;o llod luawssasse paz}le nba ;sal ayi uodn uMOys ;ou s} ;salodd Fue ;o aau6}s ay; ;I 'padap }suoo aq ll }u suoi;aa Cqo .ao sisalodd daylo ou pue `6u }deay ayl uo; ;as awll ay; o; ..o}dd~Fi}~ p}es ;o ~dal7 F;}~ ayi o; padan4Lap aq ;snw pue `cures ay; F;y;uapl o; lua}o};;ns 'pa;saga;u} s} ;oadayl .aau6 }s yaea y~}yM u} F;dadoad ay; ;o uo }ld}dosap a u}e;uoo ;snw pue 6U L7 LdM u} aq ;snw s7 sa;odd •uo 47ualul ;o uodn losaa s}y; y7}M as uepdoaae u} pawdo; aq iou plnoys ;~}d is }p p}es FyM do ;no pa 4.a.aea do auop aq lou plnoys adorn P4es FyM asneo Moys pue deadde Few `;o 4d is }p luawssasse ay7 ;o ;ua;xa do gaorn ayl o; su o};o afgo hue fiulney suos.:ad lle pue Fue 'e6uoweana oyouea ;o F;}~ ay; u} 'au}7 ase8 T9T6 le sdagwey~ l}auno~ F347 ay; ur w, d pg:~ _;o dnoy ayl le Cggi `gi dagwa;dag uo ;ey1 uan 46 Fgauay s} as};oN : u}deaa ;o aoe la pue aw}1 •g NOI1~3S •pau4wda;ap aq lllM deaF leas}; lxau ay; do; s;uaws sa sse awl; yo}yrn le `auop u} 6u};caw .ae ln6ad 7su }; d}ay; 1e ldodad ples uodn 6u}deay a ;anpuoa Flle nuue ll}M l}auno~ p}es pue Fl}~ p4es ;o l}auno~ F34~ ay; y1}M Flle nuue ldoda.a a al4d flays daau46u3 Fi l~ ayI 'palualloo ade saxel F;uno~ se dauuew awes ayi u} pue aw41 awes ayi .e palealloo aq flays luawssasse ayl :s;uawssassy ;o uo}loatlo7 'S NOIi93S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide ~.'~ j ~i Q e z r O 'TJ y ~A F Z ~. > ~s-; SUBJECT: Approval to Rnnex Tract No. 12914, located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland Avenues to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 29 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexatf on No. 22 and setting the date of public hearing for September 16, 1987 REf7OMENDNTIDN It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions aDProving the Engineer's Reports for Annexation No. 29 and 22, setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos 1 and 2, respectively. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex tract na. i2yid iuceieu a: Liar nutLiieuoL w~~ti~ of Archibald and Highland Avenues to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos, 1 and 2 as Annexation No. 29 and 22 respectively, and setting the public hearing date for September 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration are resolutions giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the subJ ect annexation. Respectfully submitted, RHM:JAA:ma T°' ~~'~It~ /> /~l~+~r~ Attachments .o ~~ RESOLUTION N0. u 1 ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 29 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on Au ust 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o std work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr-ibed in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminariiy approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in s~~lCssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report fs hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the Cfty Engineer's Report for t e purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district, c> ~/~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 29 for Tract No. 12914 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Nork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered or general oenerit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. Si•=CTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street '.fighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighCing district include: the repair, removal or replacement of al' or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation li o. 29 is shown bel uw: 1, S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps Annex New lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 29 Total 5800E 444 0 444 9500E 450 3 453 16, OOOL 16 0 16 22,000E 3 0 3 27.500E 27 0 14 *Hi gh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual L amp Size Lam s Rate Mo's Mai nt. Cost 5600E 444 X E 8.93 X 12 = E47,519.04 9500E 453 X S1Q 16 X 1Z = 55, 229. /b 16, OOOL 16 X E12. 08 X 12 = 2,319.36 22, OOOL 3 X E13.84 X 12 = 498.28 27,500 14 X E15.31 X 12 2,572.08 Total Annu al Mai nt. Cost = 3T0~1~48- 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: YTD Assessment Unit = 13,585; Assess. Unit this Annex, IB Total 13,663 Total Annual Maintenance Cost = 5108 198.48= E7, 92 /year/unit No, 0 Um is in lst rl ct ,~ b~ Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6, SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", Annexation Vo. 29. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that ail future development shalt be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. Cfty Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and aDDroves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. EXHIDIT "A" Properties and inproveaents to be included within Annexation No. 29 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Arterial PROJECT D/U 5800E 45bbL~'f7,56bC TR12914 78 ---- 3 ------- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 2 9 m t .: ° •, 4" "'° crrY of RAxcxo cucA>~oxaA //A\\ y , : ~; ~: ' • COUNTY OF SAN BERIdARDINO _ `~~' STATE OF CALIFORNIli - ~ T ~~~ lv RESOLUTION N0. V~~~ l v A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 29 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OfFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. De~sc~~ri~Lion of~Wark: That the public interest and convenience require and t s ti i he intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street sights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance distrlct described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Nork: The foregoing described work is to 6e located w t~roadway r ght-o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the nffira of the City Clerk. entitled "Annexation Na. 29 to Street lighting Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Descri ti on of Assessment District: That the contemplated work, in the op n ono said sty ounc is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 29 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said DitV. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution o. as approved the report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Li,~ting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ~ST SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a- t t e~saiae t ne and n L e sane manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on Sep er 98Tat the our o 6 Dm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any obiections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or obfections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest Host contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972: All the vark herein propos- ed shall be done and Carr ed t roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of 4he State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice mall ha ma~suant to ect on o t e vermmnt Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntar~o, CaTit•ornta, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. v+~ v55 RESOLUTION N0. ~' ~ " `~'~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APP ROYAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE%ATION N0. 22 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~~work and of the incidental expenses 1n connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily annrnvaA anA ronfiraied. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and desc-~ end in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa~d~ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdfvislon, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for tFe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the nrnpocp,i dictric t. SY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 22 for Tract No. 12914 SECTION 1. Authority for Report Thfs report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance determined that the street lights to all lots within said tracts as well street lights. annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit District No. 2. The City Council has be maintained will have an effect upon as on the lots directly abutting the Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. [nprovement maintenance is considered of general benefit to ail areas in the Oistrict and cost shall 6e divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting i~rovement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Oetalled maintenance ac ti vin es on the street Sighting district include: the repair, remcval or roplacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subJect area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 including Annexation No.22 is shown below: 1. S,C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size" lamps YTD Annex New Lamp No.22 Total 5800E 1166 - 1166 9500E ---- 4 4 22,000E _-__ _ ____ 27.500E ---- _ ____ •High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 1166 X $ 8.93 k 12 = 5124,948.56 9500E 4 X $10.16 X 12 481,68 22,000E ---- X 513.84 X 12 = -0- Li,Sw ____ n :15,31 v 19 v _D_ Total Annual Mai nt. Cost 2, Costs per dwelling Unit: YTO Assessment Unit = 4269; Assess. Unit this Annex. 78 Total =4347 Total Annual Maintenance Cost = $125 436.24 = $28.85/year/unit o. o mts to str ct -~3a7-- Assessment shalt apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. JEL'I lUN S. Assessment Diaaran Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled Street Lighting Maintenance Uistrict No.2", Annezation No. 22. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall 6e annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1, City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 4, City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. EXMSDIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 22 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Arte60C TRACT D/U 5600E TR 12914 78 __.__ q _______ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. L 2 .. _ _. ~6~~M6-- _. __..___._ ~ r ~~~, „o ,~; -1-~ ~ c><T~r of xAxcao cvcAl~oxaA _~ J,, , „' ;.~ . COUDPPY OF SAN BERNARDINO _ ~: ~~ `a _: -`~~` Z STATE OF CALIFORNIA - ~ 7 im 1~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ' ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOH, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and convenience requ~ an t s t e ntent on of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Mork: The foregoing described work is to be located w~tTin roadway r~~ enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 22 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2'. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the Cen tempidieo wo rx, In Lne opinion of Sa10 L1ty LOU OCII, to 01 mere than IOCdI or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: A11 that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 22 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Re ort of En ineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution-Ao.~has approve t e report of the engineer of work which report indi r..a tes the amount of the proposed assessmen*., the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer`s Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ~~~ SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at t same time and n t same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of Said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which tine assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Septecbe~3, 398 at t e hour o pm n the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any ob,lecttons to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to Identify the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or obfections will be considered. If the signer of aqy protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htTn Act of 1972: All the work herefn proposed s all a ne an carr a rou n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be nd~suant to ett on o t e vernment Code. The Mayor shalt sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the sane, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be oublished 10 davs before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re art, a newspaper of general circulation published Tn the City of ntar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~, : v 1 G~Y'~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide .~' `~cnato"yc 1 a c. '~ }~ p P F,: D IZ ~, > 1977 SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-05 (Parcel Map 10444), OR 85-52 and DR 85-46 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and setting the date of public hearing for Septenber 16, 1987 RECOMMENMTION It is rewmmended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 3 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex Parcel Map 10696, DR 87 -02, OR 86-05 (Parcel Map 10444), n0 OF C9 ....1 nn OG AO a.. oa • ~ la•e u • n:.• ... ~ v ~yll ~. Ily ~ VI IVL nV• V Oi Annexation No. 3u an dV setting the public he aring~date for LSeptenber 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. R es ~ctf lly submitted, G;,;~..~ l/..,~t RHM:JAA:ma Attachments a~~ RESOLUTION N0. U ~ry 1 R RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report fn writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council far consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should he modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION is That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily annrnvnA anA rn of irmoA SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr- i'~ed-in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa~ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for ~rposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the nrennccd dictri :i ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhONG4 Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 3 for PM 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-05 (PM10444), DR 85-52 and OR 85-48 SECTION 1. Authority far Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter t, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts en uner at ed in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on art ari al anA rert qin ~nllarf nr e~.cn._~ Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. SECT ICN 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this repo rt to the same extent as if said plays and specifics were attached her «,,. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the s~ibject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting Improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 including Annexation No. 3. is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Lamps YTO Annex No. 3 New Lamp Total 5800E 26 9 35 9500E 0 2 2 22,000E 0 0 0 21 SOOL 0 0 0 *Migh Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 35 X S 8.93 % 12 = f3,150.60 9500E 2 X f10.16 X 12 = 243.84 0o nnrn v :13 on v li _ _ 21,500 0 X 515.31 X 12 = -0- To tal Annual Maint. Cost ~. Costs per dwelling Unit: YTD Assessment Unit = 91,95; Assess. Unit this Annex,101, 63 Total =199.58 Total Annual Maintenance Cost E~3s9..94~,4~4= (20.01/year/unit No. o nt 5 In 15tr1Ct 1YV.b8 Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexation No. 3. These diagrams are hereby incorporated wf~hin the text of this report, SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that ail future development shad be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer Files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to he included within Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: PROJECT ACREAGE 5800E 9500E PM 10696 39.39 ---- 1 OR 87-02 9.5 2 ---- OR 86-05 (PM10444) 12,68 ---- 1 DR 85-52 18.78 3 ---- DR 85-48 (PM9481) 27.28 ----- 4 ----- ---- ---- ----- 107.63 ----- 9 ---- 2 ASSESSMEI~? DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. $ ~~~... , Mtn,.M M1~Iwn L D ~/ M~/LFL .W/ J}{9- .. t P,/e it/fir ~!s < , p^*Cft •~~ Z ~ P. M ,~ ~ ~~ J `~ ~ ~ ~~ 8130 ~ + ~ W oM.° ' to~a~ti ' K-a~ ~ / Q 2 .. , ~ ... rfr 7~a+ OM. H/f r- I ~~ ~ S nom. r^.r w . I M l/w S i1/i/i2 n wMq lM~ Ifl /f•-U x ftw Nr /7f3 r ~B i~/zz 'P M ~ v59v tl PMe ! vr.'z s .~ H.l L Nom. f.72s PM. 6911 R M. D. 6 e%1-ez ~~i:,l. ~o ', a B LV F L~ Y f A ,u• S f , + W Y J i P S ai%tz f f+~' ~~ ~~' `~=~°.~;~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PM j Drn96 ,~ i~', ~,. ~, COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO l J' +~ STATE OF CALIF`ORNLI- ~ ~ T Im jv ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (~ ANNEXATION NO. $ Aaaow i~ 6TH ST. ~ o z al a ~ a 3 ~ F 4TH ST. ~~~\ a~ w I~ ~PROJL j L~ITt ~- I 0 z Z w w 1 Y a J = J SOJ(NE:4N PACIFIC R R. ~ ~~~ ~~. --ai ~i __w , , _ ~„ - -1w ---1 ~ - o~"~=`s~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(3A S~~ ~~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ` i~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T :: ~ `' ~; ~> 1V im - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (~ ANNEXATION NO. j c „ rrJrngi rr-- ~-r __-_ yS •'~ wl 1 1 i I r ~_ CRRUN r__- ,o~``~-==mss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC3A ~, -~` ~> COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO ,rj, ~'yy~\~ 3fATE OF CALIFORNIA .JI IY ,m - - N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. 3 ,o~~ ".w. CITX OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~ -.S2 ~~ ~f ., ~~. -: COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ?: ~ ;~ SPATE of cALIFOBNIA N ~+ 6 Z ^~ t> ~nf -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (~ ANNEXATION N0. 3 .~ ~~-=~:oic .r'' ;~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA ~'.,_~~• '_ COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO ,.~ Y; ~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T ~; 6 ~> lv ~~ _ RESOLUTION N0. T1 ~ ~ 1~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION 70 ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1912 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tton of Work: That the public interest and conveniencece require and-it t~intentton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the houndaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wtkFin Boa dway rig t-o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "pone xation No. 3 to Street Iiahtinn i~iainLaian ~e JlS trtCC N0. o", SECTION 3. Descri tion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor in the op m on o sal tty ounct is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay `.e costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Rnnexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" maps is nn file in the office of the City Clerk of said Cit v" SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * as approve t et~repor-t of the engineer of work which report indi ates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, tssessr7ent zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lightin; Maintenance District No. 6" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments anJ for the extent of the work. ~S SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at t e same t me an in t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Septem eb r ls-I98 a e iour o pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho ~C ucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writi rg and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof fs interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all one an Carrie roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice Tall ve Inoue pursuam co ~ecn on oiyoi of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dai~Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, GaTiiornia, and circulated in Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. O 7~p CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer RY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide 9 j r. <r r z ~` ~Ig III ~ ~,~ I9"' SUBJECT: Rpproval to Annex Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, OR B6-05, (Parcel Map 10444) DR 85-52, DR 85-48 Tract 12671-1, 12671-2, 126ri-3, 12571-4 and Tract No. 12650-3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 30 and setting the date of public hearing for Septenber 16, 1987 RECONIENCYITION IC is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 30 and setting the date of pu hl is hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis/Background ._~,-~ c .,l _ ,.. nl~.li nov M_~l ani nn •bc rif via intent to annex-Parcel-Mapy10696 OR Y87-02, OR 86-05 (Parcel Map 10444) DR 85-52, OR 85-48 Tract 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-.3, 12671-4 and Tract No. 12650-3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation 30 and setting the public hearing date for Septanber 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution gi vi na preliminary appr wal of the Engineer's Reports for the subject annexation. R es peFtf ully submitted, ~ ~~~ ~~ ~', /~uu./'~ /~ ~%,~~~~,iC RHM:JAA:ma Attachments a77 RESOLUTION N0. 8 ('~'~'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIfORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 30 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses ate' said-work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily ay M' urcu mr~ wu(i r urcu. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described--in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3; That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa-iQ Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4; That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for L>~rposes of ali subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the pruyuied disirict. a~~ CITY OF RANCHO CU (ANON GA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 30 for Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-05, (Parcel Map 10444), DR 85-52, DR 85-48, Tract Nos. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12511-3, 12671-4 and Tract No. 12650-3 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requiranen is of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts en user at ed in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. I.I.-I. a- L.. ..: J..J C..- ..: aL aL.. .. ~... • •-L.:~L~J L.. •L~ district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. "mpro vement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. in the case of condomini uns with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a to*.. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been nrepared by vpcrS. 'hc pl dir "d -tree i ight5 a'rc di StipUi ated iii file conditions~of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street ~ighti ng improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. "mot a'led maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No casts will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements wfll 6e constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 30. is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps gnnex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 30 Total 5800E 444 0 444 9500E 453 10 463 16,000 16 0 18 22,000E 3 0 3 27.500E 14 1 15 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total L NIIII ~IGC 5800E 9500E 16,000E 22,000E 21,500E X E 8.93 X 12 X E10.16 X 12 X E12,08 X 12 X E13.84 X 12 X 15.31 X E47,579, 04 56,448.96 = 2,319,36 = 498.24 12 2,755.80 Total Annual and IIIL. LU)L Total Annual Maint. Cost 3Sb?1'3d1:4D~ LGIIIN~ 444 463 16 3 15 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: YTU Assessment Unit = 13,663. Assess. Unit this Annex, 386 Total 14,049 T~i.al Annudi Maintenance Cost = Ei09 601.40= Ei.80 jyearj unit No. a m s to 5 rlct Rssessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Secti^n 6. SECTION 5, Assessment Oiaaram R aLC I`IU'! Copies of the proposeA Assessment Diagrams are attached to this repor! and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", Annexation No. 30, These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the to+` of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modif tes and approves the individual assessments. EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 30 to Street Lighting Maintenance Df strict 1: Arterial PROJECT ON ITS 5800E L PM 10696 79 ____ 2 ____ OR 87-02 19 _-__ ____ ____ DR 86-05 (PM10444) 25 ____ p 1 DR 65-52 37.5 ____ ____ ____ OR 8548 (PM9481) 54.5 ---- 2 ____ TR 12650-3 50 ____ ____ ____ TR 12611-1 31 ---_ 2 ____ TR 12671-2 42 ____ ____ ____ TR 12611-3 28 --_- 1 ____ TR 12671-4 20 ____ 1 ____ 386 -0- 10 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1` ANNEXATION NO. 3D ~ ' ~., . F ~ T H.~ ~ L B LV .Ntwr.W ryII./ H A //~ t i M/CfG .W/ JJ{1 F AI Nom. 472a i W ~ Pre K/sr ss I J ~ Q ~ p~ ~ Y 3 ~ I = f~~ '~ < M • Q r ~ < u - b Z < .~ ~~ P,,,,. K10 ~, ~~` ,1~ ~ + y , ~ W ~ ~ . t~~e~ti ,. t • \ i ` v 'w. T + wllf,Wu ^ ,~ < ti.a. ~N.w wM1, ~... Inl. F i ii! v5 u./..-n W_ I 6L PM. 6911 ' / L A+r ,vin3 RM. D. i '~I~f R F lire i~/zz b e~41-it ~ , ~ 7 ~ ~; a M vs9v I , v+ - ~ ~ ; I .~ny1 x , o ~ _ f ~ 1 inq ,a~~--~0~:~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA :! COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO /at,.9ti _:. L =''~~ s ;,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T `c. ~ +> lv ~, - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3Q ARROW z w = ~ w d Y = J J srH sr. i / 71 4TH ST. ~ li L~Q~J~ ~) i3i i Q ~-~O Q O 2 Q 3 ~- w SCJ fHE~~N PACIFIC R,R. "~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA } ~~ ~~_ CAUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO '~ , Iz STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~T c; 6 ,; im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0. 3O ~ C -„ , ~UU Mq l 7 .. P .. , ~ » ~ ~ I " I ~ _ _ I M 1 n, 1 ~ ~ ... . I ~~ HFbAIM_ __~..__ .. ~ ~ +!t' w .~ I 62 ~.. ~ J L .b. 9 uel R.iv qrl ~1 i Y(~ •, Pu 10 i Po. Mr w • roux a va • ~r. PM 6U1.1 x _... y?~ ~. v r ,... ._ _._. ~U~s¢____._ _.f.,-___ '~ ELY ' •~~I~69 M1 MCI ... w. PM I~ rows v' '+~! •L ...~ `< HB fb r~ C_fNKN Ir/c 4U! CRAVE i~ ~ ~I-l R tit •!~ } w~p~~'~.s.I w ~ 'w.~'SI ~~c. ww yy I . o I... e . f1S JO QR.,,.,~•~.ur~ ~a ~~~nv ~: I~. III .~, -~-e-- o ---° ~---- -- _ 14 c~ a.I ~^ =~~ ;^ CTfY OF RANC$0 CUCAMONt3A }: ~ ~,~ .~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERIVARDINO ;~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ ~ T V1 ~ jY lv Im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3Q U v ~ Par.l .~. r3.'7~aC ~ m n is L ~ ~ ~ et ~ ~~,eso2ac a ~ ~ g a w t •L~ p ` iet.V ~ ~} ,,y 29 I o iw ~ . p. '= S ` ~ ~~~ i N e • //433 r ~D r ©ac ° 4 'C Por. 3 ~~ Is. ns 5c. i i ~ -- 1 [LL 1 ~~ _ ~Gli •a ~ ft ~ 2~ !~ .~ A ~4 -_ r I 9B.]B 4C fL6r S~_ • + 0 ,~" ".M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONt3A 95-sz ~y ~~. ~= COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO :: ~ j? STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T "c. b a> 1`v im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0. 3O ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. y ANNEXATION NO. 3D ASSESSM'~NT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3O _?~ ., '19582 I ~ ro 7 W `a Mt lS`(~N NVE 6 >kK19582~2 o I NB 112/88-91 _ ,a,.. ....iio~~. - ,f;`~?+r,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~ ,Z 3 . ; ,. ' ~ COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDIIVO yi `~ f~ STATE OF CALIII'ORNU .., 6 r N ~~ t> ~~, - - RESOLUTION No. ~1 ~ 1 1 R RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT OI STRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION qS ANNEXATION N0. 30 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSURNT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tign of Work: That the public interest and convenience require an i s e intention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cast and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. S ECTiON 2, Location of Work: The foregoing described work is *.a be located wiTEFin roadway rig t-o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the -ff;cc c` .~.~ r;t ~ rie.v e~r;t ion "nnnavat;nn Nn. 30 to Street Li qh Ling Maintenance District No. 1", SECTION .3, Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated-wo in the opim on o sai ity uunci is o more than local or ordinary pu 6l is benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the ~: aid work chargeable upon a aistri ct, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and ezpenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 30 to Street Lighting Main*. en ante District No. 1" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of ,. r.. ~. SECTION 4, Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution N-~Fas approve report of the engineer of work which report indicates the anount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Light~~g Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and ezt?nt of the assessments and for the extent of the work. a ~~ SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a~same time an rn t e same mz~,nzr as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Septem eb~6-I98 at t e lour o pm in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propose s all a one an carne t roug in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Puhlished notice .,.,rr .,, m ~. ,._.. _ -- -- a,c shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest toy the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Oail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, a r ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. l ii its` l _ v L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 TD: City Council and City Manager FRUM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide CSGMO ~C7 yl~~ }i x/ 19` SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 12650-3 located north of Hillside, east of Haven Avenue to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation No. 21 and setting the date of public hearing for September 16, 1987 RECOMNEMWITION It is recommended that Ctty Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 21 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Street Lighting Maintenance District Na. 2. Analysis/Background Attached far City Council approval are resolutions declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 12650-3 located North of Hillside, East of Havon Avanuc in St rcpt linhti nn Ma inicnanrc Dict rirt Nn 7 ac Anncvatinn No. 21 and setting the public hearing date for September 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Res~tfylly submitte/d,/ ~%Ls SIP-a'ws'tn nn ~/~js~y~, Attachments aka ./y,,. r. Gw,../ a/.~r~ July 30, 1911 City of Rweho Cucaanpa 9320 BNt Llnt Rd. Rancho Cueawnpa, CA 91730 9ubleel: Ragwet to annex Snto Lfphtlnp and Landwaplnq Maintenanea Dlttrleb toe Sract 126D0-3. AlLnt ion: CS ty lnfplnar P1NN aeceDO th1• latbr N ous reQUUt !o Soin the 1lghtinq and landeuplnp Ninttnanet d1elrlet !or Srwt 12600-3. ih1• tract L ]oeKed north of pSlldde and eN! of Sawn. Rued on wr prevloua apreeeent and the fact that CM DNr Crpk RaNa1111eH bwelat lan Sa NSntelRfnq tM pww Avwne tell, tht landaeapr NNewet L to M NNtNd at M]! rate nr at the aeae raN that N aperleant peo~tet world M charged. It wy further Snlorutlon Sa needed, pLNa do nat htel tab tc contact our oltlet. 5lnctrtly, ~-.~,. ~ .. / ~l //l • . v--«.~y ~. ~,rssrw, M1cnN1 D. Va1r1n, VSCt-PrtefdN! iNE DF~,RCf~F7(C(1MYANY 8480 UI1G AVEZJUE RANLTIO Cl1CAMON(Jf,CAUFORN4l9V)0 (714) 989-t. J93 RESOLUTION N0. D1i4~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 21 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuc amon9a directed the Lity Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1; That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expense said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in caid ronnrt n>, and oecti cs .~.~; ;,c ycreb„ preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2; That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred o~and- described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3; That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land Tn saT~Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit Lo be received 6y said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and conf finned. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Repcrt for a ourooses of ail subsequent pra_eedi^gs, and pursuant to the proposed district. a9y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 21 for Tract No. 12650-3 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" Into Street L1ghting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the tots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of yenerai ueneiii w ail areas in the uistrict one cast snarl oe divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lat. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Deiaiied maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 including Annexation No. 21 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps Annex New Lang Lamp Size* YTD No. 21 Total 5800E 1145 21 1166 9500E ---- -- ---- 22,000L ---- -- ---- ~~ cool ---- -- --° *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Lamp Size La s Rate 5800E 1166 X S 8.93 X 9500E ---- X 510.16 X 22,000E ---- X 513.84 X 27.500 ---- X 515.31 X Total Annual Mo's Mai nt. Cost 12 = 5124,948.56 12 -0- 12 = -0- 12 = -0- Total Annual Maint. Cost = 5124,948.56 2, Costs per dwelling Unit: VTD Assessment Unit = 4219; Assess. Unit this Annex. 50 Total = 4269 Tutal Annual Maintenance Cost = 3124 948.56 = 529.27/year/unit o. o n is n str ct ~4P34- Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6 SECTION 5. Assessment Oiaa ram Co;~iec of the arooosed Assessment Diagram; are attached to this report and labeled 'Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", Annexation No. 21. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. EXHIBIT "A" Properties and i~aprave~ents to be included within Annexation No. 21 to Streat Lighting Maintenance District 2: Arterial TRACT D/U 5800E 7~C TR12650-3 50 21 ----- ------- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.Z ANNEXATION NO. Z 1 e~ qv ~ 8= w r, 'arse-I ' ~ M6 ~~~ `'- ~ ~~yrl a Il "a~i' ~ +lay aC orli irniui I ~MSJY_L, l 9pb`- na. »wa w• i i i9b3(as~ I#"°a~~I ~~/%"/qay~ "'J Tw.,,..~ao ~ a~ x I _ ,, I ~{ +~ - - -ii-i i ~l~'_'_'."_n -' `fir{' ~ ..V! ' ul - _~.°~.' A ~ NB 151 /,L,, v I~` ~, 9 awvmcu u~va iwn v5ez ~~~i a I rt~acrvxz~z ~ R MB IP/a]->6 ~I ry MA HI/0091 vY3 ) ~ ~~ ~wlPlr pY 1' ww0 uR~401V ~Mi~ a NICSON bVE. 05" " ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA s~r~.' .: ~..: COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO _ ,~r,~ ` p SPATE OF CAIdFORN1A ~ T lv ., ~ - RESOLUTION N0. ~~~ ~~ " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DI57RICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. Z1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OB.IECTI ONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require ana it is i>le int~on of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located wi n roadway rig -o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 21 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2". 1ECTiCii S. uexri ciao or Nssessment uistnct; Inat the contemplate war in the opim ono sai ,ty aunt is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a di5t rict, which said district is assessed to gay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 21 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, SECTION 4, Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution N-~Fas aDDrov-~3-Ti -tit e~ of the enginerr of work which report indiCdtei Lire amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the as sessmen is and for the extent of the work. J~'9 SECTIDN 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collecte a~same time an in t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTIDN 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Septem ear IS,-Z98 a t7~ie our Tn the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the C?ty Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTIDN 1, landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; All the work herein propo~sTiall one an carr a roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTIDN 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma~suan o ec on o e overnment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and a 6.. n:~,, rl..~L .6.11 •6n _ 1n An ..6l:. MA 1n M~•~ Anin.n •Fo dafo .~ . .. .. ~ .. ..yr _~. ~. set for the hearing, atyleast once in TherDail~ Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntarro, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~; n/~ - CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA GvuMO, STAFF REPORT ?~ '~~., ~~Sir. ~i, IIA DATE: August 19, 1987 F~~I~ ~ il? a T0: City Council and City Manager 197 FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, OR86-05 (PM 10444) DR 85-52 and DR 85-48 (Industrial/Commercial Area) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 5 and setting the date of public hearing for September 16, 1987 RECOlMEN011TION [t is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 5 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the shove described projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Analysisl8ackgruund Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's ;nt cnl rn , . m,..~oi M,n tnaoa no ov m no oa n_c ~iw innnn~ nn oc co and OR 85-48nto Landscape ~Mainten ante District No. 3 for Rnnexat ion No.-5 and setting the public hearing date for September 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Res pectfplly submitted, RHM:JAA:Jh ~~. ~ LiJJ[// ~ /~i~~ya.i[ R?tachmen is 30~ RESOLUTION NO. ~~ ~ l T I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEIfATION N0. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required 6y the Landscaping and Lighting Pct of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~saia work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descri]-ie~in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa~sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for-ti~rpos es of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 3U ~- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON G4 Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 5 for Parcel MaR 10696, OR 67-02, DR 86-OS (PM 10444) DR 85-52 and DR 85-48 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, The City Council has determined that Lhe areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-OS (PM 10444), OR 65-52 and DR 85-48 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of- way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Di of si on. Reference is hereby made to the subject development map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said yiuru uuu iNc~~i ~~ai.iwu Nele at ia1;11Cd Oe reL V, SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contr r.~a analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($. 30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated oni y, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cast for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 5 is as follows: Existing annex ,New District No. 5 Total "ot al estimated annual maintenance area - sq, ft. 0 0 0 Assessment acres $380,399.51 $107,63 $380,507.14 Total cost r assessment 0 x E .30 unit fur year and month $380,507.14 SD/year 0/month Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTIDM 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit q", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTI DN 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportionai to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention [o gnnex to District and sets public hearinn Hato 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex tc the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a Du blic hearing and approves, or modif ~i es and approves the individual assessments. Properties and improvements to he included within Annexation No. 5 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: Project Acrcage PM 10696 39.39 DR 87-02 9.5 DR 86-OS (PM 10444) 12,68 DR 85-52 18.78 DR 85-48 27.28 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. S •.. , ,.. F.~ ~ Mil L e LV ._ „a M.KfL .Y// /J,r awre rr/sr ~s P ~ N•. r.72 s _~" ~ -~ ~A~ ~ `~ / , ' ~ f b = L A2J0 K•p-9 ~R ~- ~- ` a~ f ~ 1 ~ Q~M~. At • • • L.i [µ~I. a PM. ••n •• rM 7114 a ~N /1,•K T •~~ •~~TCAI.~[f r w• •aY. P. AI. 6'911 ' Pwr .vrrn~ ~ ' '~ /~,~~ 6e/41•~t ~ F, '~ P M vs9v e. b ~r CITY OF RANCHO Cl,'CA,~IONCA ~.~~~, _~~ I~ ENGINEERING DIVISION ' VICINITY MAP i,n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. .3 ANNEXATION NO. Jr ARROW z z ~ W W W Y F Q J N = J W ~ O i a a 6TH ST. ( z Z a ~ al 3 a F /J~ ~ Z W 4iH ST. ' •'I( ~ v~~ 1 PROJECT ~ ~ 81TE i SOJ THt 7N PACIF IC'i __ Rf~ "'___--~~ -~~~o- ~~. ---~`u __-,nir---- ~„r._~ -~.~~ ~- 1 I ,oy ``~'O`^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,~IONGA }o j ., _; ~ eNCINEERI;~c ~IVislo~ ~ T ~~ ~ vlciNlTY MAP 1~f ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. $ 0~ 01 va. 2p 4.. a 1 ...._ ., ~ w r I ee„ a yl 1 1 ~ w.r 1 ~ ~. t 1 ~ .., I 1 h' ~ e.1ENClM _ _ _ Pr: _. , 1 ~ ' ~., . IYI I , al l r - Ltc ~ Np P~>' ~... 1„f k: 1. _. ^6 VI inn __ Cf NtEA` 9 ~ . Poe ~ + ,. .. ca to ra Po. r t~~.1 ~' ,e.~r M b z F se ~e ier „ .YI ... EL11 M Iv) ro . m~ia Ibl 1 I r~ ~N~ q~- it ~ ~ ~' J 62 Ib i P'L I W 2, Pv 7 ev • 2 ~ ~ ^e I ~) 11 ~ .f OS a~. ..: ,, ~~.„ :: J l ~`TTrr - ~ D ___ 14 TY OF RANCHO CUCA,~ ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP n N 0~ M1~ I.• I`I W, M1I MI MO ~ ~9 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. $ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ' ~ /! ~`~"~`^ CITY OF RAiVCHO C(.'CA,~IOIVGA w ~y5 s~ ~' : ~'. s~!_~,rCi:::, ENGINEERING DIVISION w T :' JE ~ 1\,11 VICINITY h1AP nn ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..~ ANNEXATION N0. $ ~,%`'"°'^ CITY OF RANCHO Cl,`Cr1,`1( ~; ~ ,~ eNClNeeelNC o1vIS10N ~L ~~ ' VICINITY ~b1AP n N RESOLUTION N0. V~~O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE iT RESOLVED by the City Council of the f, ity of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1, Description of Work: That the public interest and convenience require and-it rsTint ention of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and facfliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract maD within the boundaries of the Droposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways, SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w t n roadway r g~~and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 5 to Landscape Maintenance District No. ,~~ SECTION 3. Descri ti on of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor in the op mono sa ty ounce is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: qll that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 5 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" heretofore aDProved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No, *, indicating by said boundary l iiies the exteni of Lhe territory inciuded within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. I~ SECTION 4, Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution N~Fas approved a-th reps of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 5, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected at t~same time an in t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on Septem ear TG, 798 , a e our o in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the smne, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. JL I1N. L~111V i..Y ..r .. herein propo~sTiatl a one pan came t rougy~rn `pursuance of an act Yof the legislature of the State of California designated the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma~suan to ectron o t e overnment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Mari- o, traT iorni a, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 3/~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide c~~NO,yc~ 9 j ~, ~;i' FIT ~, ~z :i Ja 19.. SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 12650-3 located north of Hillside, east of Haven Aven ue, and Tract No. 11549-1 located east of Eti wan da, south of Summit Avenue to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Anne nation No. 37 and setting the date of public hearing for September 16, 1987 RECOMENdITI01 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 37 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tracts to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis/Background Attached for Citv Council approval are resolutions decl arina the Cit v's intent to annex Tract Nos. 12650-3 and 1150.9-1 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation 37 and setting the public hearing date for September 16, 1987. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. R/pQctfully submitted, ~ ~d~y~~~~-!! G~.,,~, RHM:JAA:ma 7`~' .P'ne/~ G/ /f'/~~.~..~~. Attachment 3/3 RESOLUTION N0. Y'a~ i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Of CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEJ(gTI ON N0. 37 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED 6y the City Cauncfl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses odd work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily appruveu and cunr finned. SECTION 2; That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and des crr a in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3; That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sar ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4; That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for E~purooses of all SuhsgqunnL proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 3 ~~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. ] Annexation N0. 37 for Tracts 12659-3 and 11549-1 (Median) SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Oivi Sion 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 12650-3 and 11549-1 (median) as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map cr development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and o pe~ii i~a~iuns were accacnec nereco. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes wilt equal thirty (E.30) cents per square foot per year, These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 37 is as follows: Landscape Area 'ln. of 0. U. Per Lot Annual Assessment 867 0-~~77f1--- - Ex;sting Annex Nov District No. 7 Total 866,624 450 867,014 8,718 52 3,770 E29.65/Unit/Year Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment di agr an is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1, City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to Oistri ct and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annez to the Dist ric± or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and anpr odes, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Properties and improvements to he included within annexation No. 31 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: M4INTAINED AREA TRACT 0/U i265G-3 50@.5 ---- -- -- 11549-1 27 Blue bun Drtve 450 -- (Median Island) ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION N0.37 ,; „ ~; yz. ~ r i ., :. ~3 h ~ I, ~ ~ ~ ,ucr ,~1~ *= f ~ TRACT `~ IfaNa ~ "~ \ 17 Ni I ~~ rr s'Vl .( ~~e..,~i„~4~91 I ~,./~ ~p~ ` • u. ~!w v nr, I __- _ ___ ~'yT I~ J ~~~ I ? ~'i ] .uYN®N~F61NAff 950211 6 1NAR 95a1~I •.: n MB I l]RT]6 i i b NB H2/00~91 @~'- _ i .. q ~~*~~~ ;t WILSON AVE.' _ ~..~[br~-°Y` 1 ~~'~ t o~ er ~ CITY OF RANCHO CI,CA,VIONGA S~:r =+r~ ~ Y, ~ z _: ~ i ENGINEERING DIVISION _r ~~ VICINITY ~tAP ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ,j ANNEXATION N0.3J Area [o be annexetl - a50 so. ft. m ~~ '~ ~~ ~~ , v; --~ ~ T~1~ 1 _ `~~~ rn.. i T ~,, G ^~~ ~ ~ er q ~ + J! ~' ~ n ~... r !.n ~ ~ f~ fr ._-- - __._»x~..~_. _. -_._ _-_~_- ~_ .~._. ..m .~°t`- ~ ~``•~ CITY OF RANCHO C(,`Cr~,~IONGA }' - ~ ~'.::yr.:i~ = '~~j ENGINEERING DIVISIOY ~~, °a= vtclNlTV ;~tAr N RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ~ ~~~- A RESOLUTi ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT OI STRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 37 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and convenience requ re an s e n en ion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes 6y deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be lu~ae cu nl Glin luouw ay I lyu ~-ul -wny mlu ianu x oyiuy ea>nlueu i.> ui i.m lu>~nye Maintenance District No. 1 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 37 to Landscape Maintenance District No, 1". SECTION 3. Descri tion of assessment District: That the contemplate~c word-in the op n ono sae ty ounce is o more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes Lhe expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: Ali that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 37 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" heretofore approved by the City founcil of said City by Resolution No. •, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included wi`hin the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. ~ ~o SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolutionn N~Tias approved LFe report of the engineer of work which report indicates the anount of the proposed assessment, the di strf ct boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 37 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collecte a~same time an n t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTICM 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Septem e~b r~~, 1~J87 a le our o p. m, in the City Council Chanbers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the sane, and must be delfvered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or oblecttons will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972: All the work nerern pruposetl shall oe done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be mm-~pursuan o ect on o t e overrment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to he published 10 days before Lhe date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n arro, a r ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 3a~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~~fONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engf veering Aide G~G'NO,y~ ~~~ `I A H1 ~ 2 i~ 19]~ SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 and 12671-4 (Terra Vista) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 as Annexation No. 7 and setting the date of public hearing for September 16, 1987 RECOlMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Rnnexation No. 7 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described projects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declarfng the City's intent to annex Tract Nos. 12671-1, 12611-2, 12611-3 and 12611-4 (Terra 11: Dial •n Ian daranc Mai of en anra O:ctnirf Nn 6 inn annevat inn Nn 7 and setting the public hearing date for September 16, 1987. Rlso attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subject annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respectfully submitted, ids ~ »„~, ,$a~,, RHM:JA:dlw Attachments ~a~ RESOLUTION N0. ~1 ~ ~ J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CRLIFORN IA, OF PREL [MINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE%ATION N0. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 WHEREAS, on August 19, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE tT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~i' sai~work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily alJ lJl VYCU eIN Wlli i!'IIIC U. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr-i'5-ed-in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and co of i rmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said s~sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for t~purposes of all subsequent oroceedinas, and pursuant to the propoScu' diitr iGt. ~~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANN EXPTI ON N0. 1 to LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Vista Planned Comenu nity Tracts 12671-1, -2, -3, -4, and street right-of-way SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1982). SECTION 2. General Description Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") maintains street plantings, parks, trails, and similar areas throughout Lhe Terra Vista Planned Community. All residential developments in Terra Vista are to be annexed to the District pursuant to Ordinance No. 190; areas to be maintained which lie outside residential developments are also to be annexed for maintenance purposes. This Annexation No. 7 annexes to the District the following area: o Tracts Nos. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3, 12671-4 o Milliken Avenue Parkway (west half) from Mountain View Drive to northern boundary of Tract 12671 ~ Mountain View Drive (north half) from Milliken Avenue to eastern boundary of P.M. 8842 Ali landscaped seas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the tract maps (or by separate instrument) as roadway right-of-way, aedica- tions, or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications Thy pl end apeC the aping ,.~thir ,,.. tracts have been preps re d~ by the ~developer and have been approved ~as part Hof the improvement plans for those tracts. The plans and specifications are in conformance with the Planning Commission conditions of approval. Plans and specifics t,ions for landscaped areas outside residential tracts have been separately prepared by the developer. Re+~e rence is hereby made Lo the subjert trar,t maps and the as :e ssment diagra ms for the exact location of Lhe landscaped areas. The plans and sper.i'~caLions by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said pLens and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis, and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assess- ment purposes will be as set forth below. These costs are estimated only; actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation No. 7 is as follows: Trails 8 $treetl Parkways Oreenways Medians Trees Tracts 12671-1, -2, -3, -4 0 C 0 120 Milliken Avenue Parkway 7,250 0 0 0 Mountain View Drive 9,120 0 0 0 Total areas (square feet) 16,370 0 0 120 Unit cost (annual) 35¢ per 352 per ISd per $5 per sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. tree Totals 8 5,730 0 0 $ 600 TDTAL ANNUAL COST $ 6,330 1. w jai >Li eei 4ee> miiy. The estimated total annual maintenance cost, and estimated annual assessments, for the District after Annexation No. 7 are as follows: Existing Annexation New total District No. 7 for District Total estimated annual maintenance cost $198,379 $ 6,330 $204,709 Assessment units:(1) 1 per single family ac, ~,., ur,~t .. .emu x.260 0.5 per multifamily dwelling unit 506 0 506 1,636 T2S 1,76€ Assessment Rate: Total Cost t Assessment Units Assessment per Assessment Unit Annually $120.52 4115.91 ,~~ " lomputed from all maps recorded as of 1/27/81, -~- Assessment shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in Section 6. SECTION 5. Annexation Diagram A copy of the proposed annexation diagram is attached to this report. By this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specifit benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accor- dance with the following relationship: Land Use Assessment Units in?;'-gTe~amily residential dwelling -I unit Multifamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Council holds a public hearing in June to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the prior fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Rpproval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Arnex Lo District and sets public hearing dates. - ~.. n .. • i. •,:. v.. .. J .. .l\ •..~4<.n n.... ~nJ Jn1nw J. 1. 11.Y 1•V UIIV II VV~IVY1. l.J ~/VV u~ Vy, I.• ..~ •....u..J u..u .u ..u. mines to annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. E.~ry year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. CF:kr: 917LM2 080681 3- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. '~ ANNEXATION N0.7 ~; ;~ ~r ti A A L' O i \ o ^1 V ro ~ +, ~ y Y r S I b "» '(a/2 Ve1b (~~ ~.r~.~M ~ N ~'~ C1.: rt.V n.K ~~ii uzCi .. rrt~cuY~l .~,:~ r.~en..n - ~.7~ A Mp;,,~o,r ; r..; JC JZ',~Y.~ z r.~c:~w~~ L ~ 0 0 ~~ s ~ , > . ' ,~- M ~; 1 . ,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCr1:~fOIYGA w ~~:f~~ / ` y .. ~ ' ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY iv1AP w T 1\ I _~ `I ,,., RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ~ 1 ~ r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUfAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER 7HE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M0. 4, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNE%ATI ON AS ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1, Des criDt ion of Mork: That the public interest and convenience require and i i~ stein e~~on of Lhis City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance anA operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION 2, location of Mork: The foregoing described work is to be located witTFin ~aadway n g -o -way and landscaping easements of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and iwre yar Ciw iar iy Jexriueu uu mayo wiii~ii m•e un iiie in Ciie uff ice Vi rile City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 7 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4". SECTION 3. Oes cri PPLion of Assessment District: That the contempl ate~c~in the opinionon o i3~it~i ,'1 is of~more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: Ali that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 7 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4" eretofore apprG'reA by' the City Duun~il of sail CiCy by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said Citv, 3~~ SECTION 4, Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * Tias approved t e~eport of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 1, Landscape Maintenance District No. 4" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and far the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collecte a~same ime an rn t e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on Septem er~S6-I98 , a e our o p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho ~Cucamanga, any and all persons having any ob,}ections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property fn which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or obd ections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Land~sca in~9and ..Lighting Act of 1972: All the work herein propos~s~iall be done and carri3~Froug i-fin pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma~ e~pursuant to ec ion . o t e overrment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shalt attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same Lo be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n an o, a i ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. '~ 3~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ucAMO'lc QP v ~~ 1 r<~ ~r ol, v Y„ ~, z .. > 19T7 DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor City Councllmembers ` PROM: Mark Lorimer, Senlor Administrative Assistant YU+t~ SUBJECT: ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODES RBCOMIBNDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 317 adopting, by reference, the County Uniform Environmental Health Code. BACKGROUND: The Uniform Environmental Health Code (EHC), adopted December 22, 1986, by the County Board of Supervisors, represents a restructuring of those portions of the San Bernardino Coun i.y Code (including State mandated environmental health programs) which are eniorcetl by the Uepartment of Environmental Health Services. The County is requesting that the City adopt by reference the Uniform Environmental Health Code so that the County would be granted authority to preserve and protect the public health in matters which are applicable to County services. In no way does adoption of the EHC relinquish any City control nr a~xthority over those public services which are provided by the City. The Department of Environmental Health Services is the designated local enforcement agency of State mandate environmental health i programs. However, some programs applicable to environmental health are provided by the City (i.e. refuse collection). As a result, provisions regulating those services which the City already provides for are not included as part of the County Environmental Health Code. These sections which have been nx~iuued irvm the city's consideration for adoption by reference i pertain to refuse collection and the regulations of buildings ~ used for human habitation. All other provisions of the County Cade have been included for the City Council's consideration and adoption. Ii \~ 3 30 City Council August 19, 1987 Page 2 The following Sa a brief summary of each chapter and article of the Environaerttal Health Code which Ss included in the recomended package for the City Council's consideration. Adoption o! the BnvSrotuental Health Code as presented would include the following chapters, articles and subject matter. Chanter 1 - Aulhorlty and Administration - Designates the Departaen! of Environmental Health Services as the administering agency and the Director of Environmental Health Services ae the enforcing officer. Sn addition, provisions for the authority to investigate and/or issue cltatlons, adminSetratSve due process, revenues for public nuSaances and criminal penallSes are included. Chanter 2 Permits and HearSnc procedures Routine administrative provisions allowing for the unilotm delivery o! service and the due process of law applicable to all those aciivltiea which are regulated by the Department of Bnv3 ronmental Health ServSc es subject to the department's jurisdiction. Chapter 3 - PublSC Nuisance Abatement - Procedures for abating public nuisance concerns which are within the jurisdiction of the Department of Environmental Health Services. l:napter a - Pooa Yroteetlon - Procedures for regulating food establishments within the Department's applicable jurisdiction. Chanter S Dairies and Da1rv Products Procedures for regulating dairies and dairy products applicable to DEHS jurisdiction. Chapter 6 - Domestic Water - Procedures for regulating public water supply systems and wafer wells applicable to DEHS jurisdiction. Chapter 7 - Hazardous Materials and Toxlcs Control - Procedures for regulating underground storage of hazardous substances and hazarcpus waste generators applicable So DEHS jurisdiction, Cilauter o - ri49 tC Hamuyaent - 'r roceduree for regulating liquid waste pumpers, sewage holding Lanka, liquid waste disposal, multiple ownership septic tanks and manure and commercial fertilizer systems applicable to DEHS jurisdiction. The provision pertaining to refuge storage and collectlnn (Article 1 and 2, Chapter 8, OSvSs San 3) hoe been deleted due to the City's own regulation of such issues. 3 ,~ I CSty Council Aupuat 19, 1987 Page 3 Chanter 9 - Insect. Rodent and Other Vector Control - Procedures for regulatlnp commercial poultry rmchas, rldSnp acadamiaa, snd the abatement of moaqulto, fly, rat and other public health vectara. The hest Valley Vector Control District hoe reviewed thSe chapter and does not Llnd St in conflict with any procedures they currently employ. Chanter 10 - Houaina and Ynetitutions - Procedures !or repuiating the operation of sobile Aoma parkin and arpanlzed cope and boarding schools appllcable to DHHS ,jurisdiction, The provision repulat3np buildinpa used far human habitation (Article 1, Chapter 30, Division 3) hoe been deleted since the City's Building and Safety Department already enforces Sta own building codes. Chanter 11 - Recreational Health - Provisions protectlnp the general health and safety with regard to rscreatlonal tac111tiea and bulldinpa appllcable within DHNS jurisdiction. Chanter SZ No1ae Control - Procedures repuletinp noise standards app11ca61e within DHHS jurisdiction. Provisions for interior and exterior noise atandarda are common for local Governments and do not conflict with the ctty~4 e,riat~,.~ municipal code provisions, A copy of the entire Unltorm 6nvironmen tai Health Code Ss available for your review at City Hall. In addition, the City A'ttorney's office has prepared the attached notice summary oP the cede which will assist you in understanding the appllcable provisions. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. 3~~ ORDINANCE N0. 317 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEN CHAPTER 8.20 TO TITLE R THEREOF AND ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, ORDINANCE N0. 3105 OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI NO AMENDING DIVISIONS 1 THROUGH 6 OF TITLE 3 ANO RESTATING VARIOUS REGULATORY PROP IS IONS OF THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERY ICES COVERING: FOOD, DAIRIES, MATER, TO%I CS, NASTES, VECTORS, HOUSING, RECREATION, AND OTHER SUCH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REGULATORY SUBJECTS, KITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, OELETI ONS AND E%CEPTIONS, INCLUDING FEES ANO PENALTIES A. Recitals. (i) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (Sections 50020, et seq.), authorizes the adoptf on, by reference, of the County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Code as adopted by Ordinance No. 3105 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino. (ii) At least one (1) copy of said Code certified as a full, true and correct copy thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 50022.6. (iii) A duly noticed public hearing, as required by California Government Code Section 50022.3, has been conducted and concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordirance. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 0, Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Anew Chapter 8.20 is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 333 Ord ina nce No. 317 Page 2 "Chapter 8.20 "Environmental Health Code "Section 8.20.010 Adoption of San Bernardino County Environmental Health Code. "Section 8.20.020 Pmendments tp County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Code. "Section 8.20.030 Fees. "Section 8.20.040 Penalties for violation of chapter. "Section 8.20.050 Livil remedies available. "Section 8.20.060 Sev era bil ity. "Section 8.20.010. Adoption of San Bernardino Environmental Health Code. "The San Bernardino County Environmental Healtho. 3105 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San 8e rnard ino, hereby is adopted as the Environmental Health Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga together with the amendments, additions, deletions and exceptions set forth in this chapter. "Section 8.20.020. Amendments to San Bernardino County Environmental Health Code. "Article 1 of Chapter 8 of Division 3, pertaining to refuse storage, Article 2 of Chapter 8 of Division 3, pertaining to refuse collection, and e,.r ale 1 of C.".a pier 30 of Oiv is ipn 3, pe rta ining to bu it dings used for human habitation, as set forth in the County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Code adopted by the Board of Su pe rviso r5 of the County of San Bernardino as Ordinance No. 3105, he rebv are deleted in Ch eir entiret v. "Section 8.20.030. Fees. "Notwithstanding any other provision of the County of San 8e rnardino Environmental Health Code as set forth in this Chapter 8.20, fees required by any provision thereof shall be paid to the appropriate official with respect to the issuance of licenses, permits, inspections and related matters. Fees for such activities shall be established, and may be amended from time to time, by re solu tjon of the City Council of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga. "Sec ticn 8.20.040. Penalties for violation of chdDLE r. "IL shall he unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or Sot pn ra ti o~ to v+olate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the fequlrPm PntS of chic than tar nr fha rode aAp ptaA h,a rc hy, 4ny pe r50.^., f'. :"". partners nip, or corporation violating any provision of this chapter or the code adopted hereby or failing to Comply with any of the requirements of this chapter or Lhe code ado Dted hereby shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upcn conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars !$1,000.00) pr by imprisonment not exceeding Six (6) moo "is, or by both such fine and imprisonment, Each such person, firm, partnership, or ~ .3 ~~ Ordinance No. 317 Page 3 corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any of olation of any of the provisions of this chapter or the code adopted hereby is committed or continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefor as Drov ided in this chapter. "Section 8.20.050. Civil remedies available. "The violation of any of the provisions of this chapter or the code adopted hereby shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process through means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. "Section 8.20.060. Severability. "The City Council hereby declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this chapter or the code hereby adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this chapter and the rode hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect." SECTION 3: the Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in ?he Oailv Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APP ROV EO, and ADOPTED this day of 19 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis 1. Stout, Mayor ATi~S~. 3nve rly A. Au thelet, City Clerk =~3~ Ordinance No. 317 Page 4 I, BEVERLY A. AUTRELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, da hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was given a first reading at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 1st day of July, 1981; a public hearing was held on the 5th day of August, 1997, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 19 Executed this day of 19 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Authel et, City Clerk ~3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROPI: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner ~pc~~"^zatc. ~~(` 9 a~ .. f. A F'' ~ ' Z "> 19T SUBJECT: REPROGRAMMING OF 553,735 IN UNSPENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ev ew ova a y o un s an approve reprogramm ng of funds to North Town Phase IV Street Improvement Project. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that reprogramming unspent funds o cover a ionai costs of completing North Town Phase IV be approved and that staff be directed to transmit notice of the reprogramming to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. II. BACKGROUND: In the 1985-86 program year, 5166,000 was set aside to recons ruc Acacia dnd Belmont Ct renfe ?~ !;pr tai T~nii ~Il~il wd5 rnase 1Y or the street improvements planned for that area. ;24,000 was added to this in 1986-87. The project is now complete. Unexpected soil problems in the area caused the cost of completing this project to exceed the amended budget by ;53,130. However, the City has completed several other Block Grant projects in the last two years which did not utilize the total allocation. These unspent funds are available to cover Lhe unexpected costs for the North Town Phase IV project. No other City funds are available to cover these unexpected costs and reprogramming is necessary to comply with Federal reQuirements for the timely expenditure of Block Grant funds. Also, one project, Handicapaed Signs, has nct been compieted because of lack of interest ~by intended recipients, neighborhood commercial centers. Questions about liability were given as a reason for the lack of response. Therefore, staff requests that the ;5,000 set aside for use for this project also be reprogrammed. 7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REPROGRMMING OF 553,735 August 19, 1987 Page 2 Thus, reprograaning of unspent CDBG funds to North Town phase IV would be fraA the following pro,~ects: 1984-85 ANainistration 510,259 1984/85 Turner Avenue - Nest Side 28,286 1984/85 North Town IY Design 240 1984/85 Contingency 9,950 1985/86 Mandtcapped Signs 5,000 f53,735 Ii I. PUBLIC REYIEN: Federal regulations require a duly noticed public ear ng r reprograaaatng decisions. Notice was published on Otto MB:vc 33~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~' ~7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPR06RAMIING =53,735 IN UNSPENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CD86) FUNDS FROM THE 1984-85 qND 1985-86 PR06RNA YEARS TO COMPLETE THE NORTH TOWN PHASE IV STREET IMPROVEMENT PR0.IECT. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga operates a Cosmnity Development Block Grant program in compliance with the regulations established by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; and, WHEREAS, the C1ty Councii allocated F166,000 from the F1sca1 Year of 1985-86 Community Development Block Grant to complete the Werth Town Phase IV Street Improvement Protect (Acacia and Belmont Streets); and WHEREAS, the pro,{ect has cost more than expected; and wHEREAS, there are unexpended CDBG funds from previous years which could be allocated tc this project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing to receive public comment on the use of these funds. NON, TNFGFFQOC Ac fT ovrnLPED taut fui,u'S will ve reyroyrammea to cover the cost of completion of North Town Street Improvements Phase IY as follows: To North Town Phase IY from the following pro,l ect: 1984-85 Administration =10,259 1984/85 Turner Avenue - West Side 28,286 1984/85 North Town IV Design 240 1984/85 Contingency 9 950 1985/86 Handicapped Signs , 5,000 553,735 ~~~ 339 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner SU&IECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 1986-87 GRANTEE .y-; rcnruxnwwe RtYUHI - R0v1ew of B70C ran rogram per ornwnce ur ng fiscal year 1985-87 and approval of the Grantee Performance Report for submission to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by August 31, 1987. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the 1986-87 Community eve opmen ock Grant Grantee Performance Report (GPR) be approved and the report and Resolution of Approval be submitted to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to qugust 31, 1986. II. BACKGROUND: In accordance with the requirements of the United a es epartment of Housinq and Urban Developmnnt fwunl ctaFF and the consultant, Cotton/Beland/ Associates, have prepared a Grantee Performance Report for the 1986-81 Community Development 61 ock Grant program. A copy of the report is attached. The purpose of the annual Grantee Performance Report is for the City and HUD to evaluate the use of Block Grant funds and the status of programs far which funds were allocated. During fiscal year 1986-87, expenditures for Block Grant projects showed significant progress. o Housing rehabilitation loans and grants were again issued to low and moderate income homeowners throughout the City. n ~"o~structien was completed on botn North Town Streets Phase IV {Acacia/Belmant) and the west side of Turner Avenue, also a North Town project. ~ ~~~~9 ,; ~~~~~^ ~; ~~ ~ i;= a 3 ({U CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Coemunity Development Block Grant August 19, 1987 Page 2 o During the year, major steps were taken toward the development of a park in North Town and the resolution of a drainage problem in the area. The park site has been acquired (on Feron Boulevard across from the Junior High School) and work is underway to install the store drains necessary to permit development of the park. CDBG funds are being used for a portion of the stone drain and construction of improvements on the east side of Turner Avenue. o CDBG funds help support Senior Shared Housing, a Cowwni ty Service Program, offered by Inland Mediation Board. o Several projects have been completed which have remaining funds available for reprograeeoing. A reconeeendation for reprogramming has been proposed for approval of the City Council. The Grantee Performance Report indicates that the repaired benefit to low and moderate income residents has been attained, the goal of fair housing furthered, and the comeunity has benefited from these Block Grant projects. III. PUBLIC EVIEN: Federal regulations require a duly noticed public ea n Ipr reprogramming decisions. Notice was published on . " Aug+s 7Y 1987. City'Planner OK:MB:vc Attachments ~~ Grantee Performance Report u.s thpwtMnlMNOYYM n en e U C, Cm xl^ m a I I I o OMB No PrC6 c0ii!E'o lCV]rryal City of kanchD Cucamonga I~ BrBfi-NC-06-05;6 _ ~ ~~ ,Mr~w„u,~ r.r. wmrr ~ 3320 Base Line Road YS ki Bratt Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 x(714 )p 989-186_1_ _ _ • ~ er.x-• Ccns~sls or InP Fonpwrny Fmrns Snowmy^ G~oyress AttneveU IDrouyn dm1E~~~1SBI ., - ,t p,r, a., n..i rryJ JGl9] n .~ fr r rrr ns..Hl is aaa4 J,r ., .. .. i. .5 rr.,. :9J.~.. „ . -- .. • rtf, h.r...,.. r., trr.r aa:nnr,.rmr n:.rnn rn .uc>ons rn, errxranoe nn ompmrry rna f4N. ' arl ii5o COn12m5 t ,, +tiranlar „ Inr r el ansniJ a! Ine use o f Lommun'IV JreloOmenr Brock G:an11CDBGl lunea !n ' to '...e .,,mr-rrmr, oere~rar-em rre'~PCr,.. P.. a, rp, a Inn re p epee a sea aa~.nr mwt timer penPr;t ipw dna moeerale m<omP per .. r prr.e,. , +'rr roe m o voms r, r.g^~ m ,yea wmvnunny neepa naao0 a parocWar wpencv, one ..-Le . not ~ rre rqp'^Gme al r¢a;l v oe Pnl pl au epee I„pp: e.pena¢e a~prrp me ppe, -_-,.^- r~n r a,, m~.r ,,r:m~a. rm n,P^„n s „n.a„n~, ' + 1 r' A.'r ":?tl 7"'/~a' Pn0~p5pnlal~v0 CPrnne6 Tlldl ' -'. a a nUPr anP aommu pynB v lopmenl BlpcarGmn~GpBGI Prrgram nd5 nol peen irlil'zM In ' '•^ r' ` .sl ~rPl vl ~~ e~r~"plBl?ti11rpdG p o9rampmmunrlY Utv¢lopmenl d<Irvrlres perow IM levtl pr sucn suppprl cer c Ytdl •BMIHf. Sa[Iron' npl at arllt 11 pl ln1 Unr1tU Slalaa CeM Itmrllnn CaN aM CMMMI RrFa/wal aMX app1Y to IM lwpainy n MIX Ia oranEdr, • alMr iMn a, drat ~Mmw, a y cqr, rn Ma Slaias a nantMl naU nq uOUletMn 110 mr a anlrY. rn anY~X~erIMIXm M ju Iaek , Wpanl aXpxtm~wnlw a rgrcl or tM 1 mwa eW w rmpramM rrw rqe IMn Iln Yawar w wM. ., r,r. ...r. r. ... .. -. ... __ Oenms '_. Stout, na yor ~ ~ ~ ~-~ - _..._ --01 August i997 - i< ff n nrrl 7)a y HB rhlf.: ~ y~ f + w ~ ~ N i- [~ I i i Y P f i o 0 - l y ~ I ~ ' o i~ 3. 2 .. i o' a 9 S! N N ~ _ I a ~ n v 31 f [ ~ 9 i i ' ' S C i i I r i [ ~~ i u B H T i O i N j i m v. j S ~ ~ m lL 3 c i I 2 = ' m ti ' n a ~ i ~ T n J i i 3 ? N ~ a y ~ _ n ' v u ~d q O L 'i ~ 7) a I _ ~ v ~ n I F• Z l N a ~ ~ O } -, o 6 m 3 i m a I '' ~ i a c- ~ 'I an ~ _ ~ o I _~ l aq'~ '"^c' ? m it a iS i ~ r S~ _ ' _ 6 a 11 N Z q 3 -1 O ~ M r N = . ~ N v m N I m I ~ c o t _ m rn a I \ ~ _ i < i , P P y~ o n I vvi^4a~ ~ y ~ a £j+zn-~«io-.l ~ x ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ _ __ .. . ~, I I I V _ _ I °e~°m c I _ r-T~_I__~_ --t__-- ..-~ _ .. ~ o T N a' o I f _ ~ ~, a¢ i o -. ~ 0 3 n£ n o? __ - .--. __ ._ - _.. ~ - ho y 9 ~ T _ i of e in+ ~ '' + - ~ J . ! a n _~ fl p I -~ - - - ~.~ ~ a ~ .. _. a c . . - ~ - -- m m N - = o .. ~.. - -~ u ~7 i n it o ~ a N r N .. _ i e ] . N .. 2 w o = ~ ~ n .. .. ~. I ~ it 'i 2 n c i I u _ . I 1° _ . n ~ n i _ m ~a n ~ O i T 5 ~l n q ~ a ~o 3 '' 3 _ ~. o ~m ~ 3 _ It°o = ~p . ~y 6 V I i ~v~Z i i q . Y ~ C 3 t ~.I ~ rt ~O ~~ v ? o ~ ~ '' 3 ON~~ i v q vvm I r _ 91 3 ~ m= '. CC ~ r ~ C ' r ~'t 3 I ` ~ ~ ^3 '~ i ~ n I I =~o a a p i I I 0 ~ ~_" ,°,® ~~~ i i] .a z o ~~ - - ~ c p^ ~ s _ ? O ! D €n ~ I m Sf, > > ~ I ~ `~~~~ N a ~ ~ A ~£ ~ m j' ' I q R 3 0 R ~ ~ R ~: P __ ~ " ~ i °, , S A m A P p[ €!~j 9d ~ ` r v o a ~I o<m o7~ vortor ~I ~ g a..v -ums _ &,,~ d .__ c; v a ~ a a m P o ~R o. ~+ - ~. ~. m m < i _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ro x m 3 9 3 - F 3 R j ~ ~ ~, i - 'j r 3iti 3 y a n ~ ~ s } 3 3 Y •S b~ ie °,E 3~~ J_ ~3 ~~ ~5 Gnntq P~ritxlMncs Report V.S. DyYMM01 M 14uYM .ea craw o...b e+m r aroropm/m a« n ~~ Bl G m Ogr/m Sbtua d FIMEe Prta I .M II OMB no x3mron IE.p Ilu]efial r ~ Lity Df Rancho Cucamonga R-86-NC-05-0556 Gmm 7-1-86 ;n 6-3D-87 rM 1: awp.Y M ILwb.G. MM Ee/wtlp+x om:~e rtn i oiil t IlnwpMOq C08G FUM/ b EM OI %Klwr. gepprllrp %q00 3 fi71.6 x ApplLOntl LD6G FUMG gknvw a Enlnlpmnl Wall 409r~ i INUO~}OFx. em pet p Surplus PIKn uman n.ne.augDP snn.mem s -~- lquD.}rox. ena lops c Lowa DuKMtwe um.r awnon to .~- _ O %O91fT IncOm. gKIIrK OUnnp Ins PrppreT Veer Erewl gwOlrrnp FunE InCOT1 S -D- SOUrte Amount nnp Funp vrrynm • RKMM Dur:n9 Ins Prppram veer Irnler 0/ sum I _ `I~' unlf rlparik m me Sl.luf OI FunOG PIn III. Column R r Return OI Gr/nl GunOf 3 __~~ p ;oral 1p0iLOnal CDBG Funpf Rkenk ream OI Onef Lrl 3 __°~~ ~ _ I -o.e wqG F„nm wuuple rpr uM Owinp }nn gewn:nq aMM ml,m p: ..nn I .m xpl 3 1180_6 r LDBG tonal E .gnaw Dunne inia Rkoninq vmp0 362 2 u fnawn m IcnnrY Summary Forme [orumr: pl f ___ 5 bnerpkOw 6uww EI CDBG FunOf at Eno c! inn flepM:n9 venom nine ] mmuf nne q 3 _~` _y'_. Pen II' OrweX Pq/M /MrMll b LA W MpMIMe MGMM /mare - W LOw:MM Beroln Duunq Inn RepMmG Penh -- 6 ! iolel CDBG GunOa EfwnEep Irrom ImH aporel f _ 396 __~. c Lsu vVnn:np an0 %cpnm Wm:mflnliOn COfb i G fnown :n .^Iir:1Y Summart lOrmf, column pl f __ %Z ~O}~~, Nel Efwnpnmsa 6:rplKt la %agnm e.neln celwupon 329 ,nne e/ m:nm xoe ppl , s __. r ErO+np:lurea Rw/nlm9 Lew /nO MOOmu Income Permn3 3[9. G n enowr m LcwIMOO Benelll WOrvfnwl. Pan rv cpWmn pl 3 _._ n0 Mwegle mmme Verona c n 1 in ,Xne 1 a/ e Ol line YI mlceni __ .__ '`'' 9 PrOgnm Yurl/I LOYerep m GRli:callOn PY~ PVC PV__ im LOwIMw Benenl lOr MUIIUYtK LM:IIC/Ilonf ICOTpMIe OOIY II CMI/ica11M peIIM bGM30ne Yean N . cumunl:w Nb E•penORUro BUOINI lp %Opnm Bmelll Ulcul.UOn 3 . ._. n CumunUre E:rpenO.luM3 Bemnlllnq Lpe mp MOpnpa Incdm Parwne f __ - G Perc.lnl LUmUI/I:ro fikelll lp LOe /^p MpMlal/ Income PaltOnf n na Ily a/ t Percent of Ilm Ipq __ .._ P:encuv EOmanL Op301e1e RUDLNSA IINI }G <F11 Yk 5]C 6 MB B.IOI 3yS GRPNTEE PERFOAMgN[E REP00.T No. 1 a. gssessment of Use of Community Development Block Grant Funds in Aelatipnship to City and National Community Development Objectives the 7986-87 Lomnunity Development Olock Grant Prngram cpmmitted [he City of Rancho Cucamonga to two new public works projects and two ongoing programs. In order to support these projects and programs, the majority of funds received were budgeted to them. Norlh Town Street Improvements - Turner Avenue east side North sawn is a CDBG target area because aver half of its households are low and moderate income. By repairing and upgrading public fmprovements in [he area, and offering low interest loans and grants, the Lity hopes to encourage On vale tnvestmen[ m Ine area and ensure all residents a safe and pleasant living environment. This project is a new one for 1986-87. It involves the reconstruction of the east side of Turner gvenue north of the railroad tracks to xdd curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, and construction of a storm drain (part of a larger storm drain project needed to permft construction of the planned North Town Park). Because the storm drain was added to th_ original project, design took longer. However, the contract was awarded in June, 1907, and completion is expected this year, Feron eau levard Street Improvements Funds were set asitle in 1986.87 to reconstruct the south side of Feron 9oulevard in front of the proposed North sown Park site. The project was delayed when ft was discovered that major drainage improvements w111 have [o be made prf or to park development. However, completion is expected 1n 1987. You sing Rehabilitation In 1982.83 the City established an ongoing, multi-year Nausing Rehabilitation Loan program and a Senior Citizen/Disabled Persons Repair Grant Program. the Housing Rehabilitatign Loans Program offers below market interest rate loans iwi Lh interest wn tten down by the Csty) to law and moderate income homeowners for a maximum term of fifteen (15) years. The Senior Citizen/Dlsabl ed Persons Repair Grant Program offers a non-repayable grant of up to 51,500 to sndivitluals qr families that meet eligibility and income requirements. The rehabilitation loan program performance was off somewhat in 198fi-B7. the City has, through Its program subcontractor (County of San Bernardino Office of Community Development) processed a number of applications, and four home -ehab~lita tion loans were funded. There were 37 emergency repair grants in add~t ron. City staff will work with County staff [o ensure that performance continues tp increase next year. // Senior Shared Housing The Inland Metli anon Board, which operates fair housing services and landlord/tenant counseling services for the City, has establfshed a new program of assisting senior citizens who wmt to continue to live independently but cannot live alone to find roommates among other active seniors. The Lity reprogrammed 55,000 in contingency funds to contribute to the start pF this program. The program was operational in the sunnier of '985 and all funds were spent. Twenty-two (22) seniors were counseled and one roommate match was made. 0IIx of these were lower income. This program meets the City's goal of providing a decent home in a suitable living envi ranment for all residents. 4dm1nI5LYaLlyp tOSS2 330E-0' the Clty LuJyeteJ ayyrun imaieiy i i VercenL of its en[itiement award for varicuz allpwa6le administrative costs, including Fair Housing Services. again this year, administrative costs were held below budget. Handfcap Signs The City of Ranch Cucamonga has several alder shopping centers which tlo not have signs identifying handicap parking spaces and citing the municipal cotle sections which reserve them for the vehicles of disabled customers. Rs a result, enforcement is difficult. The City set aside funds to provide the necessary signs, but questions about liability have delayed the program. City Council is eapected to reprogram the funds in the near future. Na. 7 b. The City has not changed its program objectives far I9IIfi-07 and would not change them as a result of its eaperiencei. The objectives for the :g86-07 urngram (as contained in the Final Statement Of Community Objectives) were: L To eliminate and prevent slums and bifght and conditions detrimental Lc health, safety, and pablic welfare while preserving the housing stack for people of low and moderate income. :[. To provide information and affirmative support for the Fair Nousing la of 1FO CIfIn anA CnAeril ofWensuring that all residentz~have^access to a decent home-inVa~ suitable living environment. ifl. ;o provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities in lnw and mnde•s'e Income neighburnoods in order to support rehabilita ti cn of those areas and in order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities will improve the living environment in the surrounding low antl moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of oL ght'ng conditions, az required under the national pn orities. 3u7 IV. To elimfnate hazards to the public Deal th and safety and provide street improvements in areas targeted for housing rehaDilitatian assistance. Priority in these improvements is Deing given to areas whose residents are predominantly law and moderate income and to repairs which will ccrrect health and safely hazards, thus improving the living environment. flo. 7 c. No comments were received from the public on any Vart of the CDDG program during Ine past year. 3~~ Grantee Performance Report :da' Imp I.ar,Nod 9.n4i1 WwRShwl commumly Genwpmenl ~r BIpCF Grinl Ropryn City of Ranc hp Cucamonga i 6-86-MC-C6-G666 ,""" 7/1/86 `° fi/30/87 Pv1 I_: Oired ERpendimres lw Ib Acpui4tbn. Conatrudian w eeMNliulbn of Prppwly for Nou41w Nump~r ~rlmly HRne ~ I°°..`~n".` ~e I `u,.r`".. .i I Mot apptica ble - 100b of rehab program eas'~, logy/motl~benefi .- _- .. _._.......__ Nm a ox.n E.Pi^allirw (-- Perl IP. COBG ERpendiluree Osad Only Iw SUa and OverllNd to Asabl fn IM Aepui4ibn. CpnNrvdbn w nehepillta0on W Properly Iw Msu4np i.r~..lr -- .. ._. .uu.nr wm. __-_-_--___ s~ cm n°mwr xim. a v.oPr.m e.«nwl e4 ~ '~ .'r r+:::. ~..~.~... ' M.~+-mow ~ b.`.' :: ~ ~m ~. ~ w ... ., ..... .._._ ... ..._..._.._.1_..._ ~___~ L ___ _ _ ___ <____°_ _ . i Mni apps lcab:r - r..,'~ of rehab program ua5 1pH/mod~benefi tj I I I ~I n1lpiNa.N n~al N <iR Piq SNBMB 9110$ Cf 9 ®~ a~ ax ~F ~ ~i a° ~ ~ _ - = t . ~ - - _ __ _- E -- _ 1 a - ~ = L . - ~. ~, ~ ~_ '~ - - a=~~ _ :- ~, ~: ~ a --- _, ; ~ - ;; ---- -- --- ---- ~ "~ ~I ~ ~'--- ---m- --~-- - ==a= a ~ , ~, F i:,. '.. I - ` ~ ' _ ' S L$Q+ _ J 1,= ~ _L> ~ .~Q ~ ~ ~ T € _ ~ S 2 - ~_ _ _Z _Q I s _ w 9 N r-~ ~s~ x 1 F m 1 I v+ E _ ~ u ~ _ I i r I n~ 00 ~ ~u ~.a .i ~ 6 u i ~~~~rvN L v n J I IG - ~.J ...+ .~ ... Q - _ I ' S E p ~ E ~ y ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ _ S i £ a _ T U } O C c ~_ ~ ~ t S i i ~ _ __ 2 _ _ a _ - _ I ° ~L o i` _ ow P ~ q~_~ 3 Sa I ` ~V nF F=_ < _ ; 3~i3 ; ?. Y '.~i~~ :'.iFi :' 1 ' '~i~ _ .. __ fi 7 _ F ~ = _ ~ i 3 ~ r` I 2 i _ - W = 2 2 I fP _ i _ , n~ ~~ = ~^2i { t6=. _ '6~ _ _ W F .2 i ~ -f U' ~:: '- i i 3 C S i a X53 RESOLUTION N0. L~~' ~S~Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 1986-87 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME AND DIRECTING THAT THE REPORT BE SUBMITTED TO THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, Tn 1986-87 the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California conducted a Community Development Block Grant program; and WHEREAS, the 1986-87 Community Development Block Grant Program has been discharged accordtng to Federal requirements and Deets both City and Federal program ob,~ectives; and WHEREAS, the preparation of a Grantee Performance Report evaluating the programs is required by Federal regulations; and WHEREAS, the Grantee Performance Report is required to be approved by the City council prior to submittal to the United States Department of Nousing and Urban Development; NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the report 1s hereby accepted and the Mayor is authorized to sign and submit the 1986-87 Grantee Perforawnce Report to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, /~ ~r - CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner ,p `'`~ MO'~c yyt ~9^ S/ , \ 'Y `i= C~ \\ rT•' 19'" ~ SU&IECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY - - e reques o amen n e erra s a armed Community by establishing a Business park Overlay Zone for areas designated as Office Park wi thi r. the Planned Community boundary. I. REGOMTENOATION: Staff recommends that the City Council affirm the in ngs o e Planning Commission and approve the Terra Vista Planned Community Mnendment No. 87-02. A Resolution of Approval has been attached for your review. i II. BACKGROUND: The proposed amendment would allow, sub,iect to a nT'-o~' ne.. n: ~:/ ~"~:^~~". -'~' uj wi~c . alcw designated with a base zoning of Office Pa rk VDistrict. In addition j to the uses permitted by the base zone, the Overlay Zone would allow other land uses that range from Administrative and Prof essiona1 use to retail and service uses as listeQ in Exhibit j "A". The Planning Commission reviewed this proposed amendment on ' July 22, 1987, and recommended for approval to City Council. The following section summarizes the planning Commi sslon's basis for 'i the recommendation of approval. I~, III. ANALYSIS: ' A. The Establish~ent of a Business Park Overlay Zone. The purpose '; of this Overlay Zone is to provide for multi-tenant projects fostering small businesses, Small Dusiness users typically ra~1iro a rn~i na ti rn ~C ~iij ~C and limited 'a vrd y2 araa, with the office use expanding overtime to fill most of the building I areas. The developer is proposing to establish the Overlay '~ Zone only within areas designated for Office Park District. ~~ The planning Commission, in reviewing all the office Park District areas where the Overlay Zone could occur, stated that the purpose of those commercially zoned areas south of Church Street is to provide transitional uses to industrial areas south of Foothill Boulevard and transition to the residential neighborhoods north of Church Street. Therefore, the Intent of _. - CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TVPCA 87-02 - Nestern Froperties August 19, 1981 Page 2 this transitional use and compatibility of use should be maintained in the Planned Conmmunity. The Planning Commission recommended that the Overlay Zone should be allowed only in the Office Park District area located south of Town Center Drive and west of Spruce Avenue as shown to Exhibit "B" B. Use Permitted 1n Business Part Overlay Zone. In reviewing the list of the land uses proposed within the Overlay Zone as shown in Exhibit "A", the Planning Commission determined that these uses, which range frog A~tnistrative and Professional uses to retail and service uses are coopatibie within any Office Park development. They would not create redundancy or imbalance of commercial, office, industrial and residential land uses within Terra Vista or the City. fie Planning Commission stated that by limiting the Overlay Zone south of Town Center Drive, it could provide for compatibility of uses and transitional uses buffering the Residential District north of Terra Vista Parkway. Copies of the Planning Commission staff report and minutes which fully describe the proposed amenAoent and the Planning Commission discussion are attached for your information. RespR'Fitfully submitted. i Br 1 City anner BB:NF:vc Attachments: July 22, 1987 Planning Commission Staff Reoart Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval Exhibit "A" - proposed Land Uses for Business Park Overlay Zone Exhibit "B" - Areas That Allow Overlay Zone City Council Resolution of Approval ~~~ 0. ENVIRUNtdE NTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT - - N H - ne reques o amen errs is a anne ommum y y es Lao ishi^, a Business Park Overlay Zone for areas de si yna Led as Office Part, Commercial, and Nixed Use, within the planned community boundary. Nancy ^FOng, Asso_iate Planner, pre se rted the staff report. Chairman idc Vi ei opened the public hearing. >Ir. ,]ono Me'cne r, representative of Lewis Homes, stated they had withdrawn this item several ino nths ago to modify it to conform to the advice given oy the staff and now reach that goal. If the Conmission approves to include the dance and martial arts studio in the section Nancy Fong rec omvnends them, they would be happy with them. On the subject of the percentace of the floor area in the retail studios, stores, and associated workrooms, the percentage that might De used for other Loan showroom purposes is about 50 percent of what originally was peened. This figure was arrived with discussion wi to staff and asked that it not oe reduced oelow 35 percent. Brad Buller, City aianner, indicated that the 35 percent was something the staff was comfortable with. This depends on the type of area and the tenant. Chairman MCli el closed the pabl is r.c acing. Commissicner Ct~~tiea indicated her concern regarding in Doing this is that the Commission is aoorovinc a than de to retail. One of the reasons that this was Office/Professional had to do with buffering, a part of transition from this residential area and it seems the mange would put comme rc+;1 - .d against re siden *.i al. She would not be uncomfcr table wi to cna~,i n,"ere two pieces directly auj ace rat td the corner where it is indicated CC, c„t across the rdad should remain as is. She felt there wus ^~'t a -~- , rc rea se Lhe coY,err al load arc the lane ;se across tnr roa: wc..l ~a ne tter as a transition as Office/Professional. Lommi ssi ~~er Emeri:k concurrea wi to Commissioner Chi tiea's comments. Lewis Homes has teen objecting to any more inclusion of commerci at or the expansion of commercial along Foothill Boulevard, yet on the other nand tt looks li Ke they are trying td get the possi Dli ty of addi banal commercial uses it ine OiP mr,e uy the overlay. This seems to be an into ~~~s"~ ci ~ -°:e i. ottitud e. Chairman Mic Ni e' stated the neea to facilitate the needs of Lhe people Lhat are mov~~n; into the two communities, to blanket overturn this Terra Vista Community P1 ar, which was agreed to, does not make sense, Some r"nan;e is al rl yn t, Su: to make a complete to rnaDOUt is a mistake. .hai rman Mc Niel agreed with Comm ssi ~~er Chi ti ea's cur ent on the transition/oufferi ng zone. L ~;iat- t O NLY FOR pISGUSSiON QUFcPOSES Pl ann~n~ C '-.i; for t-0inutez ,lul, 22. 1987 dJ.'~ GlitL i.l Commissioner Blakesley questioned the wording of "building supply stores° which could mean industrial. Staff indicated that this was a typographical error in the staff report. The word "building" should read "beauty" supply store. Commissioner Blakesley suggested to add the ward equipment after telecommunications. Commissioner Chi ties moved to adopt the resolution as modified. Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion. Motion was carried by the f oiiowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERI CK, MCNI EL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTUY • . < . * --carried FGi~ DISC=uS''1"N ' UR?GScS ONLY Planning Commission Minutes 2 duly 22, 1987 35~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner 19i7 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY e reques o amen erra s a anne ommun y by establishing a Business Park Overlay Zone for areas designated as Office Park, Camnercial, and Mixed Use, within the planned community boundary. I. ABSTRACT: The developer requests a recommendation of approval for e ssuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of the Community Plan Amendment to create a Business Park Overlay Zone. II. BACKGROUND: The developer originally proposed an amendment Tn c o er o 1986 to establish a Business park Overlay Zone. After .. purl is ari..y;, Li,e r"immiuy Cuwuiesiun ue tenni ned chat the proposed amendment to establish a Business Park Overlay Zone to allow industriai uses, was in conflict with the goals and objectives of the General Plan, Terra 4i sta Comnunf ty Plan and Industrial Specific Plan. The Planning Commission, on April 15, 1987, denied without prejudice this previous amendment to the Terra Vista Planned Community (Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 86-02 ). The developer appealed the decision of the Planning Commission, but later withdrew the appeal prior to consideration by the City Council. The applicant has now re-submitted the amendment to establish a Business Park Overlay Zone which incorporates almost all of the previous recommendations from s*.aff in eliminating industriai uses and limiting the intensive retail and service .... The fol lawi ny section analyzes the types of uses being proposed within the Business Park Overlay Zone. III. ANALYSIS: A. The Establishment of a Business Park Overlay Zone: The purpose of-t s ver ay one ng a e eve oper, is to provide for multi-tenant projects fostering small businesses, Small business users typically require a combination of office and limited storage area, with the office use expanding overtime to ~~~cwn'°'yc ~~ 9 < j a Y' ^ IIF ~, 'LIB ~YD ITEM G PLANNING CpMISSION AFF REPORT TVPC IWENDMENT 87-02 - WESTERN DEVELOP. July 22, 1987 Page 2 fill most of the building area. to addition to the uses permitted 6y the Base Zone, the Overlay Zone would allow other land uses that range from administrative and professional uses, retail and service uses as listed in Exhibit A". Staff Comaents: This proposed Amendment would allow, subiect o a on onal Use Permit, Business Park Overlay Zone in areas designated for Office Park only. In reviewing the 71st of the land uses proposed within the Overlay Zones as shown in Exhibit "A°. Staff determined that these uses, which range from administrative and professional uses to retail and service uses, are compatible within the Office Park development. They would not create redundancy or imbalance of Commercial, Office, Industrial, and Residential land uses within the planned commmity boundary and City-wide boundary. Reea~endatlan: Approve the establishment of the Business Paris ver ay one or areas designated as Office Park, south of Church Street. B. Uses Permitted in Business Park Overlay Zone: 1. This section begins with "Administrative Offices" and ends with "Automotive Service Station (CUP)" and as listed below: o Administrative Office o Professional office, including, but not limited to such professions as accounting, law, income tax, insurance, architecture, engineering, medicine, optometry, podiatry, chiropractic, osteopathy, dentistry, real estate, escrow, financial brokerage, securities brokerage, interior design. o Institutional and Government Use o Retail and service businesses serving the needs of office users, including, but not limited to Drinters, stationers, secretarial services, office suDDlies and equipment, office machine sates and service, messenger and postal service. o Commercial recreation facilities compatible with Office use, including, but not 1lmite' to health clubs or gyms ICUP), racquetball courts (CUP1. 3~ a PLANNING CgMISSIOh AFF REPORT TYPO AMENDMENT 87-02 - NESTERN DEVELOP. July 22, 1987 page 3 o Banks and Other Financial Institutions o Eating and drinking establishments. o Automobile Service Stations (CUP) Staff Comments: A review of these types of proposed uses nn c~ate~ha~they parallel those uses allowable 6y the City's Development Code within the Office/professional District. Therefore, the proposed land uses as listed above are acceptable. The Commission may wish to consider allowing dance/martial arts studios to Commerical/Recreation Facilities under a Conditional Use Permit as these types of uses are also very similar in nature to health clubs and gyms. Reeo~endation: Approve the above section of land uses within e us ness Park Overlay Zone and add Dance/Martial Arts Studios to Com~erical/Recreation facilities under a Conditional Use Permit. 2. This section begins with "Retail studios, stores and associated workshops" and ends at "City planner approval" as listed below: Retail Studios, stores, and associated workshops for the nurnnca of calac nffire ehnymrvn a„d Anei ~~ with workshop for the custom-made samples of products for display only in the showroom for the following types of arts and crafts items: jewelry, picture frames, quilts, ceramics, pottery, and specialty gift items. Custom made consumer goods within studios, stores and associated workshops may be allowed provided that the workshop area for custom made consumer goods are ancillary to the studios or stores and do not exceed the 35% of the leased floor area, and subject to City Planner approval. Staff Comments: These types of land uses are similar in nature o a'1-" r~~dios" which would be a compatible land use within an office park development. By allowing office, showroom, sales, and design studio types Of activities, it provides an oppcrtuni ty for "one-man operation", or an artist to set up a small business. The main objection to the previous proposed amendment was the introduction of custom manufacturing uses, which are inconsl5tent with the intent of the Terra Vista Planned Community, the goals of the General P.an and the Industrial Specific Plan. Staff recognizes that these types of design studios do need some space for custom made samples of product Or incidental custom-made the limited order of 3' / PLANNING COIMISSIOA AFF REPORT TYPO AMENDMENT 87-02 - NESTERN DEVELOP. July 22, 1987 Page 4 products. It is also recognized that it would be impossible to distinguish the custom made samples or the limited order of a custom-made product from a customer. By limiting the leased floor area for custom made samples and/or consumer goods to 20b rather than 30S as proposed, it becomes an incidental ar ancillary uses to the main function of the business, which is the office, sales and showroom. Recomaendation: Approve the above section of land uses with etfi'~mo i'fi-cafion that the maximum percentage of leased floor area far custom-made consumer samples or goods be limited to 20E subject to City Planner approval. 3. This section started with "retail and service businesses serving the needs of residential uses", and ends at "ticket sates, etc." as follows: Retail and services businesses serving the needs of the residential uses, including but not limited to the following and subject to the approval of the City Planner: Interior design office with showroom, catering establishments, contractors lexcluding contractor's yards), building supply stores, fabric stores, shoe repair shops, antique dealers, security APV{fP Cd1PC BOA CPYY{fP TP1 PIlI1fl11P CdiPC IIIOOAnP sales, pet grooming and supplies, opticians, medical supply sales and rentals, electrical, electronic, date processing, and telecommunications sales and service, audio/video sales and service, furniture sales, apparel shops and similar businesses. Convenience retail and service businesses such as food and beverage, newstands, bookstores, barber and beauty shops, cleaners, travel bureaus, photo developing, tuxedo rental, bicycle sales and repair, locksmith, ticket sales, etc. Staff Co>•eiKs: These types of commercial uses would be compatible Within an Office/Park development. There would still maintain a degree of distinction and balance between r.,xaaprciai, offii:n and mix uS9 typo dlStri cts within thn Terra Vista Punned Community. Reco>•endation: Approve the above section of the land uses w n e us ness Park Overlay Zone. 4. This section starts from "Community Facilities as Specified Above" and ends at "Parking Requirements..., approved by the Planning Commission" as follows: 3~ ~ PLANNING CgMiSSIOA ~AFF REPORT TVPC AMENDMENT 87-02 - NESTERN DEVELOP. July 22, 1987 Page 5 o Communities Facilities as Specified Above o Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses. o Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification. o Parking requirements for business park shall be the same as for Office/Park, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. Stiff Ca~nits: The above land use language is acceptable. Reca~endation: Approve the above section of the land uses winess Park Overlay Zone. IY. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: As a result of the Initial StuQy, staff as a erm ne a e proposed Amendment would not create potential significant adverse impacts, in that, the proposed Amendment does not alter the present planned land use of the Terra Vista Planned Community and the General Plan; and that it would not rnnfU ri ui th fha nhi <rf ivnc anA nnliri oe of !ha Gannna! mlan and the industrial Specific Plan. If~the Commission concurs with the staff findings, a Negative Declaration could be prepared and recommended to the City Council. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In considering the proposed Amendment to the errs s a anned Community, the Planning Commission must make the following findings: 1. The Amendment does not conflict with the land use policies of the General Plan, and 2. The Amendment does promote the growth of the land use element, and 3. The Amendment wqutd not be materiatiy injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. Vt. CORRESPONDENCE: This Item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing and the property posted. 3~3 PLANNING COMMISSIOA AFF REPORT TVPC PMENDMENT 87-02 - NESTERN DEVELOP. July 22, 1987 Page 6 VII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Coxmission conduct a pu c ear ng to review the proposed Amendment and to receive public input. If the Commission concurs with the findings, then adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council would be in order. Respec ally su tted, ra ul r City Pl nner BB:NF:ko Attachments: Applicant's Letter of Request Exhibit "A" -Proposed Text from Lewis Nomes for the Business Park Overlay Zane Exhibit "B" -Proposed Designated Areas for Overlay Zone Resolution Recommending Approval to City Council 3~~ RESOLUTION N0. 87-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT N0. 87-02, TO MOOIFY THE COMMUNITY PLANNED TEXT BY ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS PARK OVERLAY ZONE FOR AREAS DESIGNATED AS OFFICE PARK DISTRICT NITHIN THE PLANNED COMMUNITY BOUNDARY NHEREAS, the Planning Coawission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Terra Y1sta Planned Community Amendment 87-02. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the follow n~g"ff-nd~gs: A. The Ihendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Ptan. B. The Aakndment promotes goals of Lhe Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially in~urlous or detrimental to the adiacent properties. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro,7ec w noL create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on July 22, 1987. unu ruEn Errnnr „ 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, Lhat the Planning Commission of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Planned Cawwnlty Naendment No. 87-OZ. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Terra Vista planned Caasmnity Amendment 87-02 to modify the Community Plan by establishing a Business Park Overlay Zone for areas dest~gnated as Office Park District as shown in Exhibit 'B . J~a S PLANNING COIMISSI_. RESOLUTION N0. TVPC 87-02 - NESTERN PROPERTIES July 22, 1987 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1987. I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coaeisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Com~aisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coamdsslon held on the 22nd day of July, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 3~~ PLANNINB CgMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Z e s Z ~ ~- NT U O - ~ ~'`. F J !~~' - ~ Ci Z ink ~ ~ c o ~ a a U ~ m ~ =~. ~__;_ ,~~ .-1 .ti ~ O~ m V « LL m ~' W~ ZO U u « ~ O ¢c,~ ~ ~ ~ j E v~ ~ c:. ~ ~ O? 2F G j N ~ O ~ " J W ~L~ Q; C ~ 1 Z ~ ~ N 2 ~ Q Q W W ~ T J U .q~ ti ~ n w C W N 1 W K ~Y / n G w _N J lJ ~- L o «_ n 3 a d ar m c ~ y .. $ ° a.. ~~ E$ c;; u~° v > E u «_ 0 N C a d ° C m N° E y j -- c n c o. ~ c ° v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c ca wA~ ~ 0~ m ~~ 01 N~ w~ c a q~ O a~ U~Na '001 m s c m m J i m m ~a °''c u t°. O m 9 > C b=~ q N >• u t u a a a v `v~ N m a u u ` c "~~iO«~ i0 ~ c t` ~`w ,`a~E of ~ . 01 c.aNd 3'u ~-o v c c v acs ~ac+4°i ,un=w~ ~ and ~:°.w =:.w E° Oa000~wwin_ 'mu o. in u700~ E- N d ~r y. c o C o U O r ~C O-m~mOf~wm mm w- ` >• J H N e d ~ yi 0[ ~ Q a N C m _ c• u aEuacl u~n'c~a "01 c rvH a o N° ~« ~° c a .d. N r «.° > >.o u >~ ~ O C y p O' T .~ N> ~ c n Y aL. m u a v~E j a L O N j u d m .N. C QbQ ry~ "' ~ O Y ~e N> CCL d=~ E ~'N> and Y EW ro °a O^°' ~n 'o m°~ v° ~ ~°a >•O '~ d y a~ c .a c~ L a a w a. ~ u N v c~ .'_^ ~ E G y m ~ j m m a L N N N N N .~ u ,.: y• a N L- C_ N d 'in ~ ^ u u m ~ C _y y U 0= ~3 N C N I 0 m GJj -_ c N m X_L >Jto":.~y "~NL X41- C "~« 4) L ~ « O O y m° E j° Q'j N N E N U .°. 3 c C" m ~~` Nm` [° p d E cd a_ mmvvo~~'a-au'^~E v9'm a 'va o. L G 0 m a ~] >. E X U 0 ~9 0 a Q W m O p d rw c,, Jr as ..-dram o.U rwo ~ Ha ~y ~$ a ~~ U0. NU E "' m L `0 0 a U ~ ~ u ~ J O' v ~ x~ .n U O N C E c c N J u d N L U - E ~ c ~ a c N .d.. O u c v 1°, U N ~ ~ c y Y U U C > ~~ ` O '° N ~0 v a c m v 0 '^ °' E s c « m ry m w 0 9 E J a C L A U N `oo m cw 0 0 NQ L O U a ~ ~ m ~ «Oy Cyy [ O m « 41 S c E ~ L c;u u r34~:' ~c9a+ G-~-=6wf ND"' a c ° d L n7 N L N d ~+ ` g E w o m ; ~ N E vovo ~ N N ; u .EL o ° E N ~ U r ° ~~ si c J.. ~ u ~ c •~• m y O T •v c N in O.O ~wtT $ O N ro N Y p N O ~g~~ ~ ] H ~ 3 a._ N ; Y v _«c? m ` w o 2'~~ O. ~.. rm i w n m 0 w N w C vd cc a N C ~ - ; c „ m L n._ r w a.L_ N~ C o V, N d y N / ° ry W °-~c ? C N J O d ~ O N N W ~ ut o; ~ E N E c Nx Jam'- ',`ao °~~ maU v~ !~ L pi W N V „ u - L C n O N Nor L U 7 ~ O n n c E L a } ~ ~ 0 r N ~ n N Q n >. Nc~ ` a J ~ `o E v N c'°> N `m E c ° L~~ ~LG OUP a~~ N1 • L N VI iA O L >. F Y> •Jl OI N Cl VI n Ti L L° L >, p 'O n G r 0 ._ °~« C C m J N° W I C W ~9 U „N. N "O ~ C d~ L L C~ M ~ L U X N n ,Un ~ >. N v°i a 'n d `~ Y m NOL'U~•C yr d ~O.U °'~3`nvE c=" Ey >'u,9«J°cN m ccut °i~ u E C c 9 % ~ .. C_ o G o m a m y N~ C C y N Q f"CnBd°N C > ° NN -UOryN d'L aL > CJ ' d U N n .'J C°~ ° b _ N L ~0 n N N d C D N ~ C > G a w wU9 ~SN~C L C Np TLn ~'O uNL U~>'W~ n ,°p> 10EE~r9 n N7i0 u7mmmm C$'m >'^J9 •° 70 ~ ~ n~ o= n'p u « ~ v w w E- E uni - a u 9 »a'. m '0°oq= ~ mrn~ 3~LLymm~E ~ mP~.°.m •~ 'oo A V N n~ d~ n u~ o a °u N Ornm «~ o a z~ c c° n n « N U N'~O ] N o ~ 7 u U ~= v j,u N~ •00 m m a n G y n O _ L .0 '~ r '- G o° ~~ d G d o 9~ ~ C° > - L° m n ~ n O B E V. C °U ~- N n C T ..` _° L O .: W ?~ N.U. v r C v .w"r~ uLN c+N a",~m~~o~m LCa~ V y n ~~ mN._ ..cyL,a> '>d 'mc L vmm« ,nm yn L>' - L V ~E` o;E°vQ v^~ c°'~E" acm N c Nr~=~ ~,c m '- `o o~ m a a '" ° n c« '" °1 0' ar c w~ w'o ~ n C,." y N n r0 9 L n C ~ 0= q L L N L N V ~ N y g ~ N r >`? C O- d'^ JAL nC m~ .U A'L'.L ya dy.~.C C > ~p[>rd ~C o Fn '~ ~ n C 21 U f° C _'~0 3 c C m O ry d d C C o N 7 J ° yi O ~ y V E y b c« u« >, ~ C ~ .~ O C - v U `~ 'O « n n 6 m~ L U m A« L H E u~ ~~~ ~@~~ ~~~ ~!, Iii GSYY a~~3 :.~A ~~ 6~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ FF~~p$~~ ~~E= UV2¢IO iW~S+ zO g s o~ edJ'L~ .. -- -= G W W 7 0 ~` C~Qj V J i ~~ f ~ Ui ~ 3 ~ ~ I 3 w I~ / ~~' ' ~ ` . Z J 1' C ~~ f ~a ~ ~ _ I({ w ~ _~I_~ l '.. =i~lr I~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I I J ~ 6 ' W ~~ I I ~ a' f ~ 3 ~ ~ I ~ ~ J ~ I 9 - "U' O ~ l+ s yr ~ z ~ _~' U I~ ~ ~ ;~~ ~~ ir-~;; --ice ~J~. ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 8 ~" T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 TERRA YISTA PLANNED COM8UNITY AMENDMENT N0. 87-02, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT BY ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS PARK OVERLAY ZONE FOR AREA DESIGNATED AS OFFICE PARK DISTRICT SOUTH OF TONN CENTER DRIYE, NEST OF SPRUCE AVENUE. NHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider alt cmmmnts on the proposed Terra Vista Planned Community Amendment 87-02; SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby Hakes the following din nai'9s: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Awendment would not be nmterialiy injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2: The Terra Yista Planned Community Map shall be amended as follows: 1. Establish a Business Dark Overlay 7nno ae e6(w.. i^ E°.yi"it "" and 'B'. SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted based upon the completion an n ngs of the Inittal Study. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Ctty Council does hereby approve Terra Ytsta Planned Community Amendment 87-02. I~ ` 3 ~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner ~c ,~_ o U F F'~ D 197) SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIYE TRACT 13541 - ALLMARK = Appeal-of -thE-Planning Comats570n's decision approving a residential subdivision of 12 single family lots on 4.3 acres of Land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista - APN 207-411-10, 207-080-01 and 48. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Caa~ission recommends approval of the propose eve opment. If, after receiving all public testimony and input, the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, then dental of the appeal wouid be appropriate. II. BACKGROUND: On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission unanimously approve entative Tract 13541. During the meeting, area residents expressed concern about the proposed connection of Sierra Vista to Red Hill Country flan nri vo, me .e~Id".ntC fclt + ~ tv6„}eL tiuu would result in additional traffic that could not beyaccommodated by the existing portion of Sierra Yista due to its narrow width and poor state of repair. The resf dents felt that a cul-de-sac design would be more appropriate. III. ANALYSIS: In its deliberations, the Planning Commission focused upon a need for the direct connection for the public safety Tn the event of an emergency. 8y not providing a direct connection, the Planning Commission felt the extensive length of the existing dead end street wouid severely limit the ability of the fire or police departments to respond. A. Through Street vs. Cut-De-Sac: Being a dead-end street of approx ma e y ee n ength, Sierra Vista 15 over two times the Length of the 800 feet allowed by Ctty and Foothill Fire District policy for dead-end streets or cul-de-sacs. The Foothill Fire District and Sheriff's Department have responded to the appeal stating their position on the various alternative circulation proposals (see attached letters). It is the Fire District and Sheriff Departments' opinion that Sierra Vista should be connected to Red Mill Country Ciub Drive. Other alternatives would create additional delays in emergency response times. ~3~a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPDRT TT 13541 - ALLMARK August 19, 19W Page 2 Sierra Y1sta 1s presently a stub street that was intended to be completed as a through street. A previously approved tract map for this site also planned to complete Sierra Vista as a through street. B. Access to Red Hi11 Country Club Drive: The area residents also expresse concern a out~ie ab'111ty of vehicles to safely pull out onto Red N111 Country Club Drive. The residents stated that the curve of the street and the location and height of plant materials makes driving the street dangerous 1n its current condition and that pulling out onto Red Hill Country Club Drive would be even more dangerous. The Planning Commission stated that traffic speeds are a concern throughout the entire Red Hill area and are not limited to dust this area. In addition, regardless of the design of the tract (direct connection or cul-de-sac), there would still be a connection to Red H111 Country C1uD Drive. As a result, the Planning Commission added a condition directing staff to investigate traffic control installations along Red Hill Country Ciub Drive. As was mentioned aL the Planning Coaotsston meeting, there is a lot of thru traffic to the Red H111 area. Mhile no iamedlate solution is avallaDle over the next few months, the Engineering Division will be initiating a Traffic Management Program which would solicit .. e- _,. ~oN::t ..fir ur"- i- wi-~- ~bi~bciiiiiy iV,.Yi ti dfi ll. rl ulll eMli. Illr Red Hill-area has been identified as one of the first areas in the program. Res fully fitted, B B City Tanner BB:SM:ko Attachments: Letter of Appeal Letter from Foothill Fire District Letter from Shertff's Department Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report 3 ~3 ~ 1 ~ I..c_ µ•~ . Dear Mayor Stout and Council Members, ~ _~ iii July 14, 198 J`l~ -RECEIVGD- CI7Y OF RNIC4O CJCAMONOP PLPNNINC 01'/IS'O"I P.M PR 718;9;la;11;L""'~ „3,~;n;5~6 r. The enclosed appeal is being submitted on behalf of the residents of Camino Sur and Sierra Yista regarding tentative tract 17541. plan find enclosed a map illustrating our proposed alternative. Arty questions regarding this appeal or our proposed alternative may be directed to Michelle ar Tom Lindley Tr., 84y9 Camino Sur, 985-x+472• Thank you for your consideration. ~ ~` ~, ; ~,~ ~ ~ ~ - Respecti'ully, / / / 'l_'--~- ' Michelle Lindley ~ ' city aF runeeo cueawo~a AOMiNfSTRATION JUL 1~ 1931 ~~~? 8 d ~ S~ July 9, 1987 Rancho Cucamonga City Council City Hall 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tentative Tract 13541 Dear Mayor Stout and Council Members: We, the residents on Sierra Vista and Camino Sur, wish to appeal the decision made 6y the Planning Commission on July 8, 1987, regarding the proposed development of the 4.3 acres of land located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista. We have no objections to the development in general of the above referenced parcel as we agree that such development could increase the value of our homes. W'e do, however, object to the proposal that Sierra Vista become a through street for the following reasons: 1. The homes on the west side of Sierra Vista are currently faced xith the disadvantages of having no view, and an Edison company easement with power lines cutting through the west side of our lots. Therefore, we feel the only real value to those homes on the west side is the fact Chat there is very Limited traffic on Sierra Vista. 2. Both Sierra Vista and Camino Sur are posted to eiiuw iur yuii uer~ ur eiiiu auu aeverei ui Lite reniueu~s on these streets who are members of the Country Club do traverse these streets regularly in their slower moving golf carts, a Fact that all of us on the street are aware and cautious of, due to the narrowness of existing streets. 3. Several of the families on Sierra Vista have small children who would be exposed to the additional dangers of the increased traffic on a through street. 4. The ingress/egress for this proposed project is anticipated to be from the south end of the develop- ment at Red Hill Country Club Drive however, with the majority of major shopping being to the north on Baseline and 19th streets, it seems logical that iP Sierra Vista wire a through street the new residents would drive north on Sierra Yista rather than south to Red Hill Country Club Dcive, then north on Valle Vista or Alta Cuesta. 5. Even though only 12 lots are proposed, most families today have a minimum of 2 cars, (or possibly 3, with a teenage driver) which could conceivably nearly double the current traffic flow on Sierra Vista and Camino Sur. We have rived with the potholes and eroding surfaces of these streets for some time but the possible addition of 3 7S" Rancho Cucamonga City Council Re: Tentative Tract 13541 - page traffic from this proposed development would further contribute to the existing erosion. 6. Current city requirements for residential streets require a 36' width of paved street in addition to curb, sidewalk and parkway area. Since Sierra Vista and Camino Sur have only a 20' width of paved street, opening Sierra Vista to through traffic will, we feel, create a hazard due to the abrupt nacrowing of the street from 36 feet to only 20 feet in xidth and the City's Engineering Department has stated that that' have no plans to widen the existing paved surface on Sierra Vista or Camino Sur. Sierra Vista currently dead-ends at the north end of the street and is accessed only via an approximate 90 degree turn onto Camino Sur. Due to this configuration, a member of the Punning Commission agreed that traffic faced a much more serious hazard in accessing the proposed dove LOpment from the north than from the south. The development company stated that they intend to widen the entrance at the south end of their development, remove some existing tall shrubbery to provide better visability, and agreed to install the necessary signage to create a four-way stop at the entrance to their project and Red Hill Country Club Drive. The Planni.^.g Commission seemed to have nc problem with tY.z idza of leaving Sierra Vista a closed street other than for access of emergency vehicles. ':hat being the case, we would like to propose that an alternative plan be adopted to provide access for emergency vehicles while still restricting the flow of through traffic, by means of a col-de-sac or similar configuration at the north end of the proposed new development with a crash-gate access for emergency vehiclcs. on contacting the Foothill Fire District, they voiced no objectior. to the idea of crash-gate ar_cess and, in fact, such access has been in exiseunce ac the north er.d of Sierra Vista at the entrance to the private road for many years. The development eompany does not plan to build on, or occupy their !-o posed sub-division, and sta tad at t,`,e Punning Commission _._er; ~ th__, will: 7 _ss ..., ,,,:k ... th the axi., ,.. r~~.,.~n,.s. ~M Therefore, we hereby respectfully request the City Council to erther overrule the PLanning Commission decision, or uphold the decisron with the revised condition that Sierra Vista remain a closed street while providing emergency vehiclE accts s,thereby protecting the value of the existing homes, reducing the risk of accidents, and maintaining the more rural environment that the exis :ing residents value so highly. ~+~ [hank you for your consideration in this matter 3 ~~ Rancho Cucamonga City Council Re: Tentative Tract 13541 i / / Yan~elI ~l~ ~ ~ ~_ ~- ' ,y G: .. dame ~ ~ ~~- vame y1~ ~~ ~..'.a:..t ~ -~fadr _~ ~ ~ i $ame .~ i ~ `„3 me . ;(nc Ccl' ~ / Address Address ~ ` Address \ Address l Address Address Address Address Address Address . a~+! rz~ Address Address 7~~ 1 ~~ a~ni /~u~i~ Address 78(x2 ..d.~t~na~- V.A.o*"e- ,,.....a» / l Address ,/~ Address f1.f~ i ~/ .ems.., ~ %~. % ~~ Address ~~ j n . , ,-c.ci~ Y ' ,~ n Rancho Cucamonga City Council Re: Tentative Tract 13541 Name c, Name ~'i Name fT Name ~ - ~, ,_ . Namre ,i !_ Name Name / "~ ' ~ 'e Name Name Name Name Name Name 7~yY~~s ~ ,1~~~. Address 7P%Y~~tol.,uf Address 7~"7v ~<<i.n7rv~.ti Address ~~ ~5 Cvc,n L' il-r ~ Address Address A']d/~d7ress/,~ ]/G~~'(.Y: ~L~IL ', [.ice Address Address 79.~~~ , ~/_ .Ls Address ~~ 79t0 ~E,crw U~SrA Address Address Address Adtlress Address Address Address 3 ~~ ~i 44 a' _ 3 :~ -_ ' . :, i . __ . . _ ~ ~ J ` <_ I _ ~J ~ = ~ 1 M Z _ _ _ ° i ~ °~ ~ *4 a7 - tl ~iF .~.: --- ' ' ~ J Ip z : ~ ~ . 98 71 E '~~ 'I' Isr ~ m 9 si l~ 2 " , -- . to ---- d~;q ~~ - ry g - r N _ M• I x „ ~~ 3 'i i8 I LY ~ d ~ Y s . w ~ i ~ I I C ~ . ' J • « ~ -9. . nAbi/ ~ ~ 1. 'T ~ ~' ni - -MIY: ~ j M. ~~0 I ~j _ IS ' !t' I , ~ ~~a: r. 3 23 3r..e9 OWe I .. L M~J I _ y J ~ w ~ r~MU~/ It~ (•L~ JLL.. 14 A 13 12 ~ PnH•2L'33 axarlcnl ~~ g b IP1 LOT ~ ~ ~ . ~ _ , . ~ n.. ~ ~ rY ~..r.~ -~ / ~ ~ 9nr • A ~ c y. -•~~"~ W 3 O ~ ~ 3 ^~ ~9 ~ a ,, ~ ~ d M.3..12.1 ..~ G .< ~Tcxo ct,~c~~a~/cn, „~,~, ~ M,~ Pt.ncvtvtr ^ txv v ~1 ~t~ ~, 5 -, .. ~~I _ 55 ?3 ~- ~ .,~ ~~ --- ~ 3 a- ~~ f }',I V ~ { ~ . _ ~ _~ I1 I I ! 5B 71 ~ . I.: I ~~ -- - 69 - 70 ..• II L _ I Q 19 ~2 rc~., ~ P .~ B ~ L - %ss-.. f I i ~ .~ . ~ , - - 5 yM J S _, t = ,C ,_ _ F i , p i7 '. .~ b i~ , ~ ' 8 ~ ~ w _ r _. ,I1 o - ~ 15 ~ ~ . o..... -E < a ~M.I ~}' ]~ '~ i ~ Z., , 10 ~~ ~ 'r ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ d •OM _ n .,i/ ~ '~~;- L II ~ :~ n wrw .T y-19 IY-s - C~M1 w 7Z Z~ .,il ~ "tAC7 NO• SU6q'i w~ ( ~ ~r,<r 7 3^59 M.3. 2 ,.~.~'1' z3 a%m - --14 13 i 12 ~ MB. ZI~'33 ~` 7~d3'ION 4'i~ 3 a ~~ f ~ "~, 1` ~ \ a M.3a2, 3'a ~ 9 i G n~ CITY OP 3 ~ rre,~~: ~r iss~// RAI~'CHO CL'CA~v10i\'CP, mom, '~-,~,.op PNtv~NIA '" DIY V ~ .•, ti - _ ~ ~ ~ .: -_ ~ ~ - --_ --- ~I-_~- - -----~ 3 ~, :~ '~ r 1 ~ i ~ ~ .\ '`. ~, ~ - _ v - + ~ ~___~ __.__C. - ' r ~e r 98 'I .~. ., q :d ~ .. ~ c9 '0 ~ i n ~„ ,. ~ ~ Q .9 ~ alp /i i ~ '1 i ~,, i ~ ~~c W ~ • " -"B ~--~ e.e. _ 24 ,., ~ ~ ~--r ,. s `,I ~ ,~ s Z2 --.ac - 1 ~ ~~a ~ ~ >.:5v n.1.3. r r .....+..i4 13 Y '2ED 3L 5'v.u. 12 ~ MB.2L'33 S T.%LTION IL!- LOF i3 Y i J ~ y7 , ''• 's / i ~~d \ ~~" ~~ ~ 4 `A 9.J21 3.,~ C r CITY OF 3 ~~ rrE~-: ~i.3s~/ RAI~'CHO CL'G°~v101~'CAA rmE~ '7r-rr.ye~ PLANNING DM 1N T, r July 17, 1987 Re: Tentative Tract 13541 Dear Mayor Stout and Council Members: Regarding the appeal requesting that Sierra vista not be made a through street, I would like to express my personal feelings in addition to the reasons stated in the appeal. Although "Red Hill Estates" primarily developed due to the Country Club, that isn't why many of us today live on "the hill". As you Know, Red Hill is a unique one-of-a-kind area - a somewhat rural, mountainesque haven in the midst of a very rapidly growing city. It is for precisely that environment that many of us chose to buy our homes here. i never truly realized how accustomed I had become to the sounds of traffic until I moved onto the hill and experienced the wonderful world of "quiet"! I quickly discovered that I really love being able to drink my coffee each morning while listening to birds chirping rather than cars passing. The size of the proposed development and how many cars it may or may not add to the traffic passing my home isn't necessarily the issue. If it cnly increased that traffic by one car, that's one more than xe have now and the thought that it could be Eive, or ten, or twenty, depresses me even more. I realize that our "rural" setting doesn't appeal to everyone but it obviously is our choice or we wouldn't be appealing this proPOSed change. Those that prefer to live in a more "modern" neighborhood with sidewalKS, street lights, and through traffic, have many choices of location within the city. Those of us that prefer not to have very few. You, as our elected representatives, are faced with a tre- mendous task in dealing with the incredible growth we are now experiencing. I appreciate the fact that requiring improvements in new developments is one way of planning for the future, and I respect your concern and effort in trying to make it all work effectively. In return, I hope you will respect our desire to be able to enjoy our homes as we have in the past. I realize that development is inevitable in undeveloped areas and that many times re-development benefits the community as a whole, but I somehow doubt that the "community" really cares whether or not Sierra Vista becomes a through street. Those of us that live on it, do. we aren't asking that you prevent the development of an un- developed parcel of land - merely Lhat you not allow that development to 'a nnecessarily infringe on our rights as current residents. Respectfully, yy Q-Ca.wG (1 Diane Staggs 7862 Sierra Vista Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. p VINEYARD National MBank 7Te Honorable Dennis Stout Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamwga, California 91730 Dear Mayor stout: ~,f cr~,~rp•Q b,vFp~ &,r ice`, ~YS "oNC.v a; August 5, 1987• /6 Sometime during the month of August, the Rancho Cucavnnga City Council will be dealing with a controversial item which will be coming through the council as an appeal by Che homeovnera of the Red Nill area hoping that the Council will overturn a recent de- cision made by the PlannirMg Commission regarding Sierra Vista Avenue. My wife and I live at 7928 Sierra Yista which ie the last house on that street and is vbere Sierra Yista presently deadenda di- rectly north of the 5 or 7 acre parcel planned to be developed by A1lmark Co. We stand to suffer the vast as property owners with respect to the lose of approxirtately 12 to 13 ft. across the entire front yard if, in fact, the City videos sierra Yista Avenue on our side of the street. A petition has been signed by the homrwners which contains the sig~ture of both my wife and myself and has been attached to the appeal which the Council will be reviewing. Since the circulation of this petition, I have met vith Brad Buller, the City Plarner, and have reviewed the proposed details and the various iaQrovenwnts being recoenvended be made on the entire project. Mr. Buller assured me that any widening of the street would be done an the opposite side across from our house and, would have no affect on any of our frontage. With this in mind, coupled with the assurance from the city that this is the case, then we withdraw our names from the petition and have no ad- ditional objections to the development of the property. We vould prefer same sort of a cul de sac as opposed to a straight through shot connecting Siena Yista to Country Club Drive. How?ver, we are leaving that up to the City and the homeolmers to argue over. I woul9 appreciate your passing this information ~+ to the proper individuals in the City. Yery tru~'y yours, _S President •JMIM"i•R~iIVE C,~~l 8158 VINEYARD AVENUE PO BOX 727 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAIIFOflNIA 91790 (71i~9a]A1 ]] 3 ~~~1CAlllll ~Il]C'P. P. O. qOX 75 . 6677 AMETHYST ST, . gANCNO CUGMONGA 91701 (7111 907.2575 ~, TO: Brad Buller, City Planner RuS S'MeGUire, City Engineer Tony Mize, Vice-President, Allmark and Anderson Realty rrYYAA~~ FROM: Lloyd B. Almand, Division Chief/Fire Marshal UJ~`r' SUBJECT: Access into Tract No. 13541 DATE: July 27, 1987 After another review of the proposed tract, it is still the requirement of this fire district that access be provided as originally agreed upon during the Tech- nical Review Conunittee meeting, and subsequently approved by the fire district. Other alternatives to entering the proposed tract have been looked at, but all of those alternatives created a delay in what would be considered our normal emergency response time. The fire/medical units serving the proposed area will normally take the route of San Bernardino Road to Vineyard, to Red Hill Country i.iuu urive w Lice apEruveu eu Ley i.v Liw L. u~.l. ..ny other route will only build a delay into our response time. We have also, on occasion, allowed the use o£ gated communities with special provisions for entering during emergencies. These are normally townhouse or condo- minium type projects that are considered as clustered housing. They are private communities, have a home- owners association and are totally enclosed by walls or fences and gates. These gates also build in a delay in our response. They are reluctantly accepted only because of the private community concept and the inherent security problems that come with these types of developments. Again, in an effort to emphasize the need for the most direct and unobstructed route to this proposed tract, the plans as originally submitted and approved must be maintained. ~J g T INTEROFFICE MEMO ~~~ GATE AUGUST 7, 1987 PHONE FROM CAPTAIN GILMORE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF'S STATION RECEIVE 0- TO BRAD BULLER, CITY PLANNER CITY of RANCHO cuurAONCA carT «~ ~~ PLAN VINO OI`/'S'ON i :.. _ _ IC .~.1 A0. ~ PJI SUBJECT TRACT N0. 13541 41g!9iL1~111LC1~?I'3i4~516 The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Crime Prevention Unit has once again reviewed Tract No. 13541 and is requesting that access to this tract not be changed from the access that was approved during the technical review phase of the projects development. The Sheriff's emergency vehicles serving the proposed project area would normally take the route of San Bernardino Road to Vineyard, to Red Hill Country Club Drive to the approved access to this tract. Any other route would only create a delay in our response time. The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's station has maintained excellent standards in responding to emergencies in a minimum amount of time. To maintain these standards we feel that the most efficient access to this tract is the one originally approved during technical review meeting. ~. EG/DG/hj cc: Russ McGuire, City Engineer Tony Mize, Vice President, Allmark and Anderson Realty 3gs R~Hl~OJO An 9q0 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PUR?OSES chard fuerestlan, 8331 Utica, Rancho Cucamonga, skkd the design ist Avenue is set out in Lhe Etiwanda Specific Plan. Ne was pped that the Commission wants something different aM wooled 1L4ti on on this issue. Brad Buller, City Planner, staled staff would continue k use the Etiwanda Spec is Plan and would make sure what is approved is consisknt with Etiwanda Plan. Mr. John Holt, 5335 nelian Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, skkd back east it is not unusual k f a home turned around so the driveway comes in from the back, you cou reorient the houses to fue East Avenue, there's no law skting you h to come in from East Avenue. Chatr~an MCNieI closed the hearln Go~issioner Ea^rick wooed adoptto of the resolution with the modifications of added brick/rock to t front of the house eleratlans and referral k skff the dekiled land pe of wall plans for East Avenue. This may include the requirarent an additional landscape easement. In addition, make the 5 1/2 foot k wall along Etlwanda High School a minimu• of 6 feet. Ca~lsstoner oisky seconded the motion. Motion was carried by the following rota: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLET, CHITIEA, EMERiCK, EL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOME ~~ . e . * + _-carts rd 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 - LANE - The eve opmen o a o cus ^ su v s on on acres o and in the Low ResidenLtal District 12-4 dwelling units Dar acre), locakd north of Red N111 Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista - APN 207-411- 10, 207-080-01 and 48. The applicant has also filed a Tree Removal PerN t. Scott Nurplly, Assoclek Planner, presented the skff report. He staled that a number of letters relakd to the protect had been received. A petition signed by 12 ha^eowners expressed their concern about the connection of Sierra Vista k Red N111 Country Club Drive and their proposal is that Sierra Vista become a cul-de-sac. The applicant has received coptes of Lhe letters and has reviewed thy. Chairman Mk Niel opened the public hearing. ~;?,~~=T FoR DI=cU~sio.l PURPOSES 1-~ Planning Commission Minutes 20 July O8, 1987 ~7° C :.FT FOR DISCUSS;ON PURPOSES Mr. Tony Mize, representative of the applicant Allmark, Inc., stated through the two Design Review Committee meetings most questions and problems have been worked out. They agree with ail the conditions of the staff report. He addressed the concerns of Mrs. Dufrese' letter regarding the lot at Country Club and Sierra Yista t0 the west specifically the drainage problem is going to be resolved very adequately because the mount of water that has historically flawed down the hill into the people's backyards is going to be virtually eliminated by grading and channeling the water out into the street or some minor surface water through specific easements. They arc obligated by law to control the dust problem during construction- The driveway Mrs. Dufrese will be able to put in once they have the street in and that' will allow for her approach. Me could not address the sidewalk issue. As approve by staff, they arc required to put in the sidewalk. It is his understanding they are complying with the preservation of the trees Mrs. Dufrese has. There is same landscaping out at the approach for the radius at Country Club and Sierra Yista which will come dam which is part of the other problems to be addressed. On the second letter frw the neighborhood residents, they worked very diligently in trying to look at all the different ways in making everyone comfortable in what they were doing. One of the thoughts was to not go onto Country Club Drive, perhaps bring Sierra Yista down to the bottom and then create a cul-de-sac. This was unequivocally dented by the Foothill Fire District because of Lhe distance from the nearest street frw the nearest street to the end of the cul-de.sac; it violates every ordinance they have relative to that, them is dust no way to approve that from their point- of-view. This meant going Dack to the original design which was master planned and approved and that was that Sierra Yista would ultimately run all the way through to Red Hill Country Club Drive. As far as the traffic flow that Ts occurring on the hill in that area, to the south thcrc i~ hi;.".".r :~ns',v `~!r; L~ ••~:«••i'«"".- s~~..y .,ss ~w~ hill, you~have very curved ylinear~streets, the solution may be a four- way stop at that intersection of Sierra Yista and Red Hill Country Club Drive. Basically, there are curves coming from both ways and a busy ingress-egress from the condo pro,{ect and you will have same traffic on Sierra Vista making this a very logical place to place a four-way stop. In May 1982, Or. Powers and the Dufrese granted to the owners of the property the land that would create the radius needed at the intersection to a11ow for ail codes to be met. In exchange for granting that property, small strips of larM by the developer were exchanged since they only needed 60 feet for the right- of-way. This has been intended W be a street and has gone all the way through the process through tentative map approval designed as a street. Regarding the visability aspect, Mr. Mise stated that when those radius areas are developed with a street and all the tall shrubbery that is maw fling in that area is eliminated, the visability will be ouch greater and the intersection situatfon were afour-way stop would solve ail the problems. D n^^,~, FT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Planning Commission Minutes 21 July 08, 1987 $7 Dr. Joseph Powers, 46412 Sierra Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he has used this lot as an access to his residence for 26 years. He has no objection to the project, but feels that a through street was not an appropriate wdy of using this lot since it is a real hazard. It should not open onto Country Club Drive due to the speed. His major objection was it being a hazard and feels the best use would be its use only as a fire road rather than a straight through street. Mr. Thongs Lindley, 8479 Camino Sur, expressed his concerns regarding Sierra Vista. This street was never meant to be a thoroughfare, it is only 20 feet wide. A cui-de-sac at the top (entrance to) the top of the project would be the best idea. The turn on Canino Sur from Sierra Vista is a very sharp turn now and with the increase of traffic flow on Sierra Vista, people will this as a through and wilt create a terrific traffic flow problem. N1th regards to the suggestion of a four-way stop at Red Hf11 Country Club Drive and Sierra Vista, it seers the developer is asking the City to alter the traffic flow on Red Nill to accowaodate his development. This is one of the oldest neighborhoods in Rancho Cucamonga, changing the traffic to accommodate a shall development is culture shock. Mr. Leland Swanson, 7989 Sierra Vista, has lived on this street for 37 years. For 40 years, the street has been chained off or dirt blocked off W keep the residents from Waking it a thoroughfare which has been respected. The safety of the children and drivers would be put in jeoparQy if it was Wade a through street. His recommendation/and suggestion would be the entrance from Red HT11 Country Club Drive be brought up to the present cul-de-sac and Wade a south cul-de-sac for the southern part of Sierra Yfsta. The entrance to the north end of Sierra Vista is an aqually dangerous corridor, made more dangerous Dy the down hill turn. People who live there now are used to the turns and curves of Sierra Vista, t0 make it a through street would be unappropriate. Mr. frank Luchinski, 8550 Red Hil Country Club Drive, objects to the project until the traffic problem can be solved on Red Hill. Three or four serious accidents happen per year, with minor accidents happening once ar twice a month. He also stated the water would go into the ground, raw with the roofs and driveways, the water will drain down, turn to the east and go to the wash, but we will have four times as much water on a heavy rainstorw from the roof and the driveways. He suggested the area be considered fora park which was originally granted from Mexico City. tt is a shame to wipe out the history in the beginning of Rancho Cucamonga; there should be some mark of our history how Cucamonga was developed. Mr. Steve -6#s"senbach, 7928 Sierra Vista, stated he believes the applicant has the right to develop the property with restrictions. He agrees the street going through would create a traffic hazard in front of Dr, Pavers' home. There is limited police protection. Where would the exact widening of Sierra Vista would start and how much of his property would he loose in front of his house. There is no objection to the improvement of the land, but feels the Commission should give some serious consideration to a cul-de-sac or same other idea of preventing a._ flow of traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive. - ~ ~ i Plannfng Commission Minutes 22 July 08, 1987 .~g~ Mr. Floyd Staggs, 7862 Sierra Yista, has no objections t the development on the other end but would not like to see the street go through. The area, Camino Sur and Sierra Yista, is now posted for golf cart traffic. There is slot of animal wildlife and this would eliminat the animals. Sierra Vista is fn deplorable condition now, full of potholes and is too narrow. It will cost alot of mongy t rebuild the street to handle the extra traffic, widening it would cause his loss of part of his front yard. Down the line, assessments for sidewalks and traffic lights. He likes the hill and the street the way it is now. Mr. Ben Makel, 95% Hemlock, representing the property owners of 7973 Valley Vista, Lhe former owners of this property as Kramer Brothers Nurseries clarified the reason why the property was shut off was t restrict people from coming into the nursery and stealing nursery stock. Retired from Foothill Fire District, he understands what the builder is confronted with, it is true that the access problem would present him a problem by cul-de-sating it at Red Hii1 Country Club Drive. There are ways this could be mitigated, create a cul-de-sac situation mitigated with the Fire District which would allow for the development. There is access also the possibility of an access from Monte Yista side as not t allow a thoroughfare from Country Club all the way up to Camino Sur and this should be considered, Mr. Larry Archinage, resident of Red Nill Country Club Drive, stated he does not have any reservations to the development of the property, but does not approve of the idea Sierra Vista being a through street. Ms. Laura J. Deeks, 7908 Sierra VTSta, has no objections to the development oP the property. She does object the thoroughfare does present a problem whereas small children like to play out in the yards. !f there is increased traffic flow, Lhis presents a potential ha rarA Thic ie .~.. develo ~ ~ ~~ " ^ -~ Lhc Jecal uywenL IS goon. Ine sold to whoever want d tosbuy`Lheslotscaswthey aret~Theynhavevworked hard to develop the neighborhood t the value and the worth that it is. Ms. Ada Cooper, 8420 Country Club Drive, statd she has lived to Rancho Cucamonga since 1924 and owned the property since 1940. She does not object the development, but rcquestd the Co~wisslon t be sure the water drainage problems are taken care of since there arc more houses, more cement, and more sidewalks there wt11 be alot more water coming down. Mr. Duncan Jilson, 8537 Chula Vista Court, resident 21 years, agrees with Mr. powers there is a definlt dangerous situation if 0.ed Mill Country Cluo Orive was opened up with afour-way stop, There are Mo blind curves coming into that point; there are alat of accidents occurring there already. Traffic backup due to the four-way stop will be an all-day, everyday occurrence. In reference to access to the alleyway, Monte Vista Or1ve, is there any driveways coming out backwards onto the alley? This Ts a very small alley and would be r~iite dangerous if it was an access from the new dwellings. Di? aFT Planning Commission Minutes 2? = ~ DIS CiJ~~;-' ~^ rul'y' 0~~,~•1987~~ _ _ D R.v F`f r DISCUSFiIOP~I 1~Un^pCSES ONI.~ DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Chairman McNiel stated these all front on from the proposed street. Mr. Jilson stated someone suggested changing it and using it as a full access road. If that occurred, the street is only 20 feet wide right now and this would Dean cutting into property on both sides and cutting into property values of quite a few homes if this approach was accepted or used. Mr. Richard Avant, Y1ce President of Allmark, inc., stated they appreciate the concerns brought forward but was somewhat taken back since they made a strong effort to those immediately concerned with the problem of the site. He is long aware of the beautiful area and understands the comments of the neighborhood yet feels this development is a decent, straightforward approach to this site. They have extended the alley to allow Mr. Cissenbach without any fee or going through any legal hassles so he now can get into the back of his property rather than off Chula Yista to support his particular probin. In regards to the drainage, there is not much absorption in the soil and because of design~hehwapter istto bepchanneled toward the street with theMexcep ion of the rear lots, Lot 5, 6, and 7. In meeting with Ms. Cooper, she gave them some history about the Mall put up there since 1t was put up was because of the water problem. Their proposal with her was to remove the wall, to construct a six foot decorative type block wall wh1cA would enhance her yard and not detract from the view of the iaountains, they are sensitive to that fact and wanted the Ce~ission aware of that issue. In regards t0 Dr. Powers, there are legal problems involved and a they arc working towards a solution. In regards to the traffic problem, there is a traffic problem now and many cars are now existing in the proposed street onto Red Hiil Country Club Drive. There is alot of trafffc in and out of there with two residents. Regardless of "bother •kt st~aat yuea iurough or not, it would behoove those residents~of both those properties to lower the shrubbery, at least the radius, Lo pick up another 20 or 40 feet of visability around those curves. Regardless of what happens to Lhe street, this is only a recommendation to perhaps offset any problems the residents have observed. A four-way stop 1s another way of mitigation. They have no oo,{ection to the cul-de-sac, as a company or as a designer, but they do understand the problems with putting a cul-de-sac, whether it be at the north end or south end because of engineering and safety problems. Because of the narrowness of the street of Sierra Vista, there would be problems to have fire equipment try to get in there because of the roofs being of shake and turning around. This is probably why the Fire District could not concur. As far as Speed control, the Commission could take the traffic out an alternate route or a lot by lot basis. S1e400 CCOwfor~the park~othentthey can They aref asktngntheaguidancepof the residents and the Coawission and would like reach an amicable solution. ~~; :.a1= r FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES O^;_.; Planning Commission Minutes 24 July 08, 1987 ~~ DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. John Holt, resident of Carnelian Street, feels that the traffic problem will continue until it is properly addressed as well as Foothill and Baseline where the traffic exists. He felt Mr. Grant offered an approach to slow down the through traffic which is the real problem, not necessarily where the street comes out. If a street light, traffic bumps, guard gates, traffic sign is the answer to the problem instead of where the street comes in, this should be the major consideration. Mr. Tony Mize stated they have worked very closely with the staff and have been through Desfgn Review two times and now have a staff recommendation for approval with conditions beyond the standards conditions and they agree to meet all of those including offering, as the developer, to be amenable to a condition that would require the developer Lo create a four-way stop. Chairman MtN1e1 stated he, too, was a resident of this area, and feels emotionally tied to the hill. He lives on Alta Cuesta between Camino Sur and Valley Vista where there are two stop signs. He fought for the stop sign at Valley Vista and Alta Cuesta which has slowed down traffic and even deterred some traffic through the neighborhood. However, there are some things to the design of this street which would deter traffic, the fact that there is a radical corner at Camino Sur and Sierra YTsta on the north end. He understood the Fire Department's prospective. He questioned the distance now in the street. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that starting at Camino Sur where it meets Valley Vista, it is 1230 feet to the beginning of this subdivision. Chairman McNiel stated that from the prospective of good planning, the street should vo through to Red Hill Country Club Drive and deal with the intersection. The developer has agreed to put stop signs in, if required, which will slow down the traffic. It would not become an access road because it runs into Camino Sur and then makes a left turn. This appears to be an opportunity and understands the feelings of the residents' feeling a sacrifice of privacy. He supports the continuation of Lhe street. Commissioner Blakesley stated he is very sensitive to the issue and concurs with Mr. Ho1t's coewents that the intersection isn't the problem, the traffic flow through Country Club Drive is the problem. Commission Tolstoy stated he did not realize that Sierra Vista was 1230 foot long and before knowing that he was for a double cul-de-sac but since the length of the street, because of safety precautions, the street should go through, Ne felf that d four-way stop would be qutte appropriate, but questioned the City Engineer his comments on Red Hill Country Club Or1ve. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated there are two thfngs to consider: the signal Ts being put in at Baseline and Alta Cuesta, Chey are under design for a number of other signals which include the dual signal of Planning Commission Minutes 25 July 08, 1987 3 7/ DR,1rT i =R Dlscu531CN PUR°^;F'= Or; DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Red Hi 11/Carnelian and Vineyard/Carnelian to improve the access out. It would appear appropriate in its nature, but needs t0 carry through a review and approval process. Ne should route the through traffic through Baseline and Carnelian. Comaissioner Tolstoy felt the street should go all the way through and a study should be made concerning a four-way stop not only because of the traffic situation but because of the 61ind corner situation. In regards to the water runoff, he questioned the City Engineer. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, responded that it will be handled. There will be a full hydrology study, a 100 year storm protection will be required, and a trace out where they are dumping the water can reasonably handle it without endanger anyone down the street wilt be required before approval of the map. The hydrology study will have to address the runoffs and its increased ita:remental impacts. Commissioner Chi ti ea felt that using Lots 3, 4, and 5 to exit onto the alley is not a practical solution, therefore this should be eliminated. The idea of a double cul-de-sac which might work in putting in same higher access gets a bit complicated. It might work but the fact that one part of the cul-de-sac could be over 1200 feet long would not seem to De a safe situation. A four-way stop would scow traffic down and might solve part of the problem. The idea of offsetting the street, putting an additional curve in it, perhaps would discourage people using it as a through street. The comments of Mr. Holt and Mr. Maguire regarding the access W and from Red Hill both aL Base Line and at Foothill will help slaw down the through traffic. Mith the development of Foothill plan, realignment of the access point which allows residents to get in and out but do not encourage other people to use this as a thorouahfa ra wav hwin to .i •t,., r. .!:i_ ,.....n ._ ~.... -~.r .ur intersection as well.- she further recommended looking at the realignment of the street, putting TL through and putting a four-way stop sign there. Chairman McNiel stated the direction of the Co~issfon is to continue the street through to Red Hill, to study the possiblities and probabilities of a four-way stop at the corner of Red Hill and Sierra Vista, to put a curvature through the new lots, change the street so there's a little bend in it. He further explained that the appeal process exists for those dissatisfied with the issue. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated the developer is under the obligation to bear the expense of installation of any further traffic control devices. Commissioner Chfttea moved to adopt the resolution with the modifications regarding the curvature, intersection, the continuation of the street, and drainage. Conwissloner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Matson carried by the following vote: DRAFT 2 DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Planning Commission Minutes 26 July 08, 1987 / ~-- Red Hill/Carnelian and Vineyard/Carnelian to improve the access out. It would appear appropriate in its nature, but needs to carry through a review and approval process. we should route the through traffic through Baseline and Carnelian. Commissf over Tolstoy felt the street should go all the way through and a study should De made concerning a four-way stop not only because of the traffic situation but because of the blind corner situation, In regards Lo the water runoff, he questioned the City Engineer. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, responded that it will be handled. There will De a full hydrology study, a 100 year storm protection will be required, and a trace out where they are dumping the water can reasonably handle it without endanger anyone down the street will be required before approval of the map. The hydrology study will have to address the runoffs and its irrrcased incremental impacts. Laawissioner Chi ti ea felt that using Lots 3, 4, and 5 to exit onto the alley is noL a practical solution, therefore Lhis should be eliminated. The idea of a double cul-de-sat whicA might work in putting in some higher access gets a bit complicated. It might work but the fact that oire part of Lhe cul-de-sac would be over 1200 feet long would not sen to be a safe situation. A four-way stop would slow traffic down and might solve part of the problem. The idea of offsetting the street, putting an additional curve in it, perhaps would discourage people using it as a through street. The comments of Mr. No1t and Mr. Maguire regarding the access to and from Red Hill both at Base Line and at Foothill will help slow down the through traffic. with the development of Foothill plan, realignment of the access point which allows residents to get fn and out but do not encourage other people to Use this aS a f.Mrmm_hfaw iuv A~1~ rn .iN ~~~~ tl'i. plrtiCuiar intersection as well. She further recommended looking at the realignment of the street, putting 1t through and putting a four-way stop sign there. Chairman MCNieI stated the direction of the Commission is to continue the street through to Red Nill, to study the possiblities and probabilities of a four-way stop at the corner of Red Hill and Sierra Yista, to put n curvature through the new lots, change the street so there's a little bend to 1t. He further explained that the appeal process exists for those dissatisfied with the issue. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated the developer is under the obligation tc Dear the expense of installation of any further traffic control devices. Coawissfoner Chitiea moved to adopt the resolution with the modifications regarding Lhe curvature, intersetttan, the continuation of the street, and drainage. Coamaissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes 26 July 08, 1987 393 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE .~+t• --carried n~•. , Planning Con~aission Minutes 27 July 08, 1987 /T' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Howard Fields, Assistant Planner 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL AS`.wSSMENT .AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13541 - LANE - e eve opmen o a o cus om su v s an on acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Red Hill Country CIuD Drive at Sierra Vista - APN: 207-411-10, 207-080-01 and 48. The applicant has also .'tied a tree removal perwit. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re ested: Approval of a tentative tract map and ~'uance o a egad ve Declaration. B. Dro,lect Density: 2.7 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: or - s ng s ng a am y residences, La+ Residential District (2-4 dwelling units Der acre) South - Existing multi-family, Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Existing single family residences, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Existing single family residences, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: ro,7ec e - ow es en ial District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre{ South - Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 3 ~~ ITEM U ~ c~oyc ~' ' ~~ >II. p ~:I 8 ~? ::a ID PLANNING COMMISSI( TAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 13941 - Lane July 8, 1987 page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The subject site is vacant and situated a e upper a eva ons of Red Hill, sloping from north to south at approximately 5S. The site contains approximately 12 eucalyptus trees, 4 hemlock trees, 2 juniper trees with scattered grasses and sage bushes. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed subdivision is on the largest remaining parse along the upper elevations of Red Hill area with lot sizes ranging from 10,020 to 20,445 square feet. Street improvements will occur on Sierra Vista to Red Hill Country Club Drive as part of this development, thus improving area circulation. However, the completion of the proposed right-of- way for Sierra Yista Drive will create a nonconforming situation regarding corner sideyard setbacks (minimum 27' from curb face is required per Development Code). The applicant should be conditioned to resolve this situation prior to final map recordation. fie existing 40' wide a11Gy known as Monte Vista Drive will remain providing rear access to lots 1 and 2, and also allowing an existing homeowner continual access. B. Desi n Review Cammulttee: The Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, ~~~ uncu ~e, ou nei, u,~ u, iy,uui iy wnaiuereJ i.iie yruyusai Vn riay 21, 1987. At Lhat time, the Committee postponed the review of the project until several technical issues could be resolved. fiese Ttems included the encroachment of an existing residence into lot "A", access from Monte Vista across tat 2 and the provision for a turn-around area, and the encroachment of a block wail onto lots 6 and 7. The applicant subsequently submitted revised plans to be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. The applicant indicated that the garage addition in the east side of Sierra Vista had been illegally constructed. The plans also indicated that a turn-around area will De orovided at the rear of lot 2. The Engineering Division reviewed the design of the turn- around and determined that some modifications are necessary (a canditian with an exhibit have Deen included in the Resolution for clarification). In assessing the remaining issue, the block wail encroaching into lots 6 and 1, the applicant has indicated that the wall will be demolished. 3~i~ PLANNING COIMISSII STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 13941 - Lane July 8, 1987 Page 3 Based on this information, the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project subject to all technical issues being resolved by staff. Conditions are included in the Resolution requiring completion of these items prior to recordation of the final map. C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project proposa an recamaen s approval subject to an in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundtng of existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite (south) side of Red Hill Country Club Drive. The fee shall be one-half of the City adopted unit amount times the iength of the project frontage. Tree Removal: ps part of the development package for this roc a applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit application for the proposed removal four eucalyptus trees, four hemlock trees, and a row of juniper trees extending approximately 90 feet. All of these trees are within the right-of-way for Sierra Vtsta Street and will have to be removed in order to construct necessary street improvements. The applicant is proposing to preserve the Mulberry and eight eucalyptus trees located elsewhere within the site. E. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the initial awry anu oaa uecermrnea coat the project viii not present any significant adverse impacts upon the environment. Therefore staff recommends that the Commission issue a Negative Declaration in conjunction with the project approval. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are suppor e y e following facts: a. The proposed subdivision, Tn conjunction with the conditions of approval, is consistent with the current Development Standards of the City. b. The project is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed number of lots within the subdivision, c. Additional street and drainage improvements will be provided to make the project compatible with the surrounding area and improve circulation and drainage in the vicinity. d. The project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the Development Standards of the Low Residential District in which the site is located. / / PLANNINB CDlMISSIC ,TAPE REPDRT Tentative Tract 13541 - Lane July 8, 1987 Page 4 Iv. CDRRESPDNDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Dail Re ort newspap~otices were sent to all property owners w n of the subject site. To date, no correspondence have Deen received for or against this proposal. v. RECDIMENDA7IDN: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve en ve Tract 13541 through the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions, approve Tree Removal Peewit 87-45, and issue a Negative Declaration. It should be noted that the final map cannot be recorded until all conditions of the tentative map, including successful Resolution of the encroachment/setback Issues, are satisfied. Resp~lly su tt~ Brad Buller City Planner BB:HF:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Ut111xat1on Map Exhibit "B' - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site/Grading Plan CA1111I11. "D" - I I C< ILL'W"Y I r l O11 Resolution of Approval with Conditions 3~ ~~- ~.~ ~;- ~$ --_ ~ _ d v-~ ` ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~' ~'~~~ 9~ I i ~~~, ~~ ~~, .. ~.~ ~~ f~~ ~~ ~+ ~ ~ .~ ~ / ~~ \ .~q7 "E Cy y \i z 6y iV •% ~" ''. %~ ~~ al 'i o`*o++ L~\ 4M~ c ,'L~ __, S CITY OF rrE~t: rr i?ss~~ RAl~'CHO CL'CANIO-\'GA rmE: s.~ ~~.~~ PCANYf~G D(VLS10N ~ J `~ E~cHIOR:_ /f ~^'~ F: ,,' _ _ _ -~ - '~~I _~ _. ' ~ b7 '_f F y''_ -~-s;r 6 ~ \~~ ti m ~. I~..~.. 68 '.'~ i ~.~. • 7d - 69 ..~. ~.....~ ; III, M 2 ' `~ ~ ;9 ~ yly ii ~i 3 i ~'. ~ '3 ~P 5 ~ - ,; ~ ~ _ ~ 9 ;,,~a zz ~_~ - - i r.~... i ~ ~ P~ „d,., ~ -:~.c7 a.,ar.; ~ ~ . ~ ... `42.21:33 +~ ~~~~ :~ Ma.rM1+~r __ ~~ ^~d' i ~'~` 3 M ^ ~, d-. 1 ~ 1 A M.~,b&~ m V KOIt c~~ or ~.~~: ~ ~.~sYrr R.A.i~'CHO CL'CA,~IO~\'GA mom: ~r.~,yop ~v-nc ~visiocv you E~CHIOfT:. 8 ~ ~ F: . - - =i -- _-___T .: _.. ;,-, i ii i)' ___f __ ___~ _' 1 =, ,. ~_~-__ ~~ C-. ~^ Y ' ~ i } ~ (~,~ v r-. _ i; ~ ~..~ 1~- ~', ~ _., -'_ - _s_~ ` W _ ~- `--t a ...e c.rt NOIt c~-i-Y or 1~.,1: ~ , RAI~'CHO CL'CPuV10-\'GA rme s~r~ /c.~~:.,VC- ~.a~v 'IANNI~iC DIVLSlOIY ~/~ l E`CHI(YT~ _ C ~ .. ~ r. _ ... ~._i._-. - (il'' t, __t _' _~ ` ~~ ~w ~ _ ~~ ~` ~ -- r~u~ 'V'im V KOR cis or ffE,i: ~- ~~~ x~'cxo cL~c~v~a~~c,~ ,~,~: ,~. ~,,~~,~~ PL~IWi f~~(', DIVLSIO(V ~/p ~ ErCHIIIR: _ /~ c ~ ~ -: l.o t 1 ~~ _ N ~0 ~o a 'off i ~ ~.ot ~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ~. ~/C~ I ~; 7-T /3 s4/ N i4//tr H~~wN-er ti 1T17.E: T3.rrt aroww EXFDBIT: .~- RESOLUTION N0. 87-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 13541 - APN: 201-411-10, 207- 080-01 and 48. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Nap No. 13541, hereinafter "Map' submitted by Atlmark, inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 4.3 acres of land Into 12 singie family lots located north of Red Hill Country Ciub Drive at Sierra Vista Street (APN: 207-411-10, 207-080-01 and 48), regularly came before the Planning Cammisston for public hearing and action on July 8, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Nap subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Pianning Comwlsslon has reed and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public Dearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Coewlssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Co~lsston makes the following findings in regard to eT nfa-fire Tract Na. 13541 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentat/ve tract 1s consistent with the General P1 an, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and speclftc plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision 1s not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious puDltc health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at `arge, now of record, for access through ar use of the property within the proposed suDdlvislon. yv~ PLANNING COIiMISSIC ESOLUTION N0. Tentative Tract 13hr1 - Lane July B, 1981 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse tawacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Nap No. 13541 a copy of which is attached hereto, isTiere approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Sierra Vista Street shall De redesigned in a curvilinear fashion. The final design is subject to review and approval by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to recordation of the final map. Engineering Division: i. M in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite (south) side of Red Hill Country Club Drive shalt be Daid to the City prior to approval of the final map. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 2. Notice of intention to form and/or join the Lighting and i ...A.n.nt w.. Me~.i.• .6x11 6e it 1nA uif6 f6n rlfv rnun~il nrinr to recordation of the final map. 3, Sierra Vista Street: a. Provide 30 feet of dedication measured from centerline (h0 feet total). b. The proposed lots A and B shall be eliminated, c. The portion of the existing building encroaching into the proposed right-of-way shall be removed prior to recordation of the final map. d. Eight inch curb and gutter per City Standard Drawing No. 303 shall be used. e. Sidewalk shalt be located 0.5 feet from the right-of-way line along both sides of the street, except as otherwise approved try the City Engineer for the portion from lots 1 and 8 to Red Nill Country Club Drive. 4. Monte Vista Drive shall be improved to alley standards including: a. Sufficient additional pavement to provide a total width of 20' for the length of the tract frontagc; PLANNING COMMISSIC ESOLUTION N0. Tentative Trxt 13ar1 - Lane July 8, 1987 Page 3 b. A siniaau 0.1 foot overlay of the western portion of the existing paveaM:nt up to the concrete ribbon gutter; c. Maintain driveable access to the property to the east; d. Extend the alley across lot 2; and e. Provide a haaaw!rhead turnaround as shown on Exhibit "R-1" or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 5. The owner of the fence encroaching onto lots 6 and 7 shat i be provided the right to protest the reapval of the fence and shall 6e so notified in writing prior to recordation of the final Awp. 6. City Engineer directed staff to inresttgate traffic control installations along Red Hill Country Club Drive. The developer shall incur all costs of traffic control installations as required by the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1987. I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Caewission of the City of Rancho Cucaagnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coawisston of the City of Rancho CucaApnga, at a regular weeting of the Planning Caa•ission held on the 8th day of July, 1987, Dy the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: Cg9125S10NERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~\II \~ 6 _E~Y~v'. y SIB'. :' I~~F`Yy fi~° `S~ia !~:?2_~e~s~s ~~': 5ss ;sill d'' i~~~ pp !,. ±.: !~=?a--~~'s~ °a!! a ~~1 ;~°:~ =i' ~~a:-i °~~=3:e~ is'e ~=5r3 Iii ra_~! i; a.--! ;se°a~-=Ylsa +1~'ss ;E3 s'Ei~ ~~i_n_~ ~~_Y~~ a-__lgag;:~ s. =3 t'= .~~ie' +_F y/ 3a~ssi i~=3sa, :i3 la~i3 Sad .=. 3i ~si'a e!a!'€€ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,~ .I E a a ~~ a ! 9 s ~ ,f a ~ 9~ Y E L`Jj~73dY siE a s _a 1t3is9:~ i E e°." ! i : ~ ~ iR ~~S~a~yZ~i € _ ~~4 i ;~ l~~~a.~3 s ~ a33 ~ i 3! ~~•sit$'e y :- ~ ~=%' ~ ri ~;z j ~ != i~~~Y.g! #~~ j s _ Es a~~~~~~?a 1 t ~- 3. ~~7 M~ \~ 0 z F. U W O a ~94; avl7 S~'~5~lF9~ $~Ea i~E €-ai~aE~E ora~ ~~"`~~=Fs ;i'„_. fiS~B x44_1-}L: ;E~ E}~~ i 61S~;r# E Y.. gj f 6 g! "i_ Y if l~i'~p~" =5~ J3-~~ ~sE~l~(~Y ~i'F~ a°Y~~ ~i~~s~r~~~ 4~~ ~~~}~ a"sic"xss~e~ -I ;v s~SE 3A 8~g E:. ` ;EoY ~} 4~ ?~~ i~ Y ,,fig ;~ =l: jig :! = ~ Y a~ ?,4 4 ,s ~ e s tl :e 1 ~ i i l ! ~j } ~ i! ~ $ tRe ~sF4 y' ii ~4? iit ~F e- E ~;E jai -y ° i e i °g s dia ?a :: .:1 :~iz ,-ly ~, E ~ ZY _- E3.X =4f a ~ +sE " " ~ ~- E~y ~;aa i•- b ; I RE ~!F ~ 3yy ~ ~i ~ s$r~~ e. `~3 i x Lb ..~ 3 e 5 xi syi ;a _LY PL_sl 4`7Y.~ KiEL4 „P 2 ~j~=E1~ L-i'~ Y! aa~~t=8i xe: L!~s zs ai ff": :fig! ~ __ } _$$k } ;~y _ ai{~ 4! ER i~ }4~ i e~ 4fL1 E=' -` 6 ~e~ ~ fi_ gyyS .S , ~'S: E } ig8~ ei ~4~e gg S'Y ~Yi ~: es E=9F a 3~ z~~iE - ie d~=L F~ E Y F= ~ ` W44i H ~~ .. R iYSR !) i{ F~~ „I ~i`Y8}~'~.~ ae~ ~~I i ~I ~I ~I I :!= 'r ~l~, Six! ,1~1, €s~~~ ga. =~-~h ?~aaL ~r~4r _5 ga sYY{~a d;111; i3?1!~ 1 a gyg $23j ~!'a ta's x4E~~a Ufa ~ I a4?L` ~4:~e i3~19 tl „YS~ 3s~-~ fi~~~S.` l~c~ y~g$~s i~i~es e giaa -E~-;E g -.1 - "a4Y~4 i°a =1 E~~~4~ ~L.saL 49 €: s. I ~a E sE ~~ asnn;~~yc~s s9 ! a -s?_= ss ~ ;~ i i`SS-z~~ is i•~„s ~ l~~E ]: ^+ S t~ ~s• ~~ - =a is aaaa;g$iE~a ~~CE~ ~ -~#~~ z =:'5x ~::= - :"^ SF `i--"E #~~`•Cgs~ 81~~" =~ =CAE w fi~1^ :ate $% Yid =- CY~aag§~Ya? xEl Sp ~; "'E- c :a~a Y°' Q- a„3 :R NX~..`. Sl _ y ~ ~a"a5 a _ E~ aP^ n E:E a~ .~f~ ~kY ~4. :SY3 ~i EB.... `=°s s-3 ~p Ys~ 'x ~E$~e~s~-'i~E a;YES E~ ~~~, !3?~ i$5 z ~~~ sa iifi~~°s :s i~'-a s ~iac zFC `^ alE^ Ihi' TnF E:g ~~s!? a.s';"t i3~16 ;! is a. 'i_~: ~?^~~" aE: _£= 3~i'^'~cai;-~ ;a3"s 3a Y~~os ~_:sx ~:_ ~~ ,-°.a ~:i =<~9~~~E-si~~a ~i"a_ ~i €3i~z ~ I ~ ~I VI -I ~ I ~^I ~ I ~ _E~ EEi !i 8' Ei ~ ~6€ - 3e . i lY F: ~~8 Si;E '7 S~ ~ ~a ¢~a~ 8~$~ E~. ~ ~i1 i-i E} ltae zi~E SEE Y is ~~Y RS :_ e:~!!e ~"Ei 8~Y^ ,5 i i3 „" fia^ . ~"F Y Y as~a ~3e3 LI ~~. _~Y ~., <~ ~X~l. - of Lea F'i 0 83 :~l 'E°t:E ~j vo7 ~~,5 Es fa ~~D x~i k~i _ t fE Y~ia ~g~iBF g, '~E~ ~°E ~~ ?_ ag=_ is=~ri a; xsie #e~~~iE a= `Ails's~ ~_ ia~a aa5s;,i. xi ~~i; eyai~i~ _ - 8 YS_St ;E ~~ t.::ieCE Tel ~ E?i~ WevE~xh ^I 91 y ~ I Y75 :=B -ey £~ h i3~ tae ig~~ E I a.-as ~ a*i e. ~ - ~~; 8a !- u 'o . .~ ~8I ~ aIb ~k , !! j3~~i L~~ a dib ~~~ a~.fy aha xya isi ( .ei Y59 ,~L _~ y~ ! k_ :it ~~~ e~ ~a;s~ Ya a~~'I G~t: 3~~~1 G:~ 1 ~~ ~~ e'si M;~.i h2~= ig ~i~! ~i=EY ~: ~~_~ ?=?xg jf~~ _ ~; E g~- ~Y Z:~ ~a~-"~~ a h! g~~e ~J.~ 5 .g~~ g ~_4 .. -:i' h:a 2 g ~~'9~ hg.yi i~3E a ! 8' i3 ~S !:~3 la=.g ., ~~ i3 ~.3 lsi2 ~_~-a ~ 3Y a x-a~ lh g- aq ~3'y 'b:~~ y..a_i ~ ~g =pix y;iys ~ia5 ? .g -~- e e sib' ~~~ai. ,ii ~yi'r !~W ~' tiia""!~ t~i~e x x :": e °s=e° fi a' ==Y s8~} ~~ ~ai ssi 2f~a % i ~ :a_ =3i~ ss i~c ?=" :3af 3i i~5 ads _ n Ei~A 1~ ' ~i! ~.i~ Y' ~3 i 4 ~yR~ YxOS rg' k,~i E!!~ y;ss ?' ! s ?~~ii aY$°g ;~ ~ ~,~ tai ~ . 3l is~{ _e ~ g a;:is :_ _ iii sa~i -E3_W -. ! k-` ~~a 51 .~: - 3~ ~a'i E f.Y9 3 eh at 3~ 'C! !~~ ~ `9 ?h Sl ygy 3 i s S o 4 'p_~ ~„ .. ..= 1 S6 h is saf ¢~ ~ ~~ h • ff 'A~g ~S $4~ ~ ~j ~' y'~~J i ii ai -i' - = ax jai 5 +i - -g ~t~' s~ . -ka ' i d; _ C=~ sex Sa ' a~i~~ ~i • e , ~•i~ ., " " _._ 5` ash ~~- yR3 h ~,j - Y ~,; y ~~ ~ '3 ~i i .s ~ a tt. :i ~ ~ yi y i„ ! h~s Y~ _ yx= __ a;a ~ Y ~ l~. ~F ~~i vAl 8 ~ii t:~t ~I ~ I ~ ~I ~I ^i el,~ ~ I ~ I ~/o a 0 x F- u W O a ass 1~a~ss : i ~~~ i i t ,sag g ~~~ ix=a~' -}= b = € s yi~1 ~ k~' ~ $: s es'i Ys- i r pia a Ja- 3[e % f 7i~'~ s i S E*} ~QY etb ~.~-.~. jig ~ t~~ a " „ aa!3 ? "1! '1 ~~i =~t aE ~ i b=712 ea awl 7}!~`1 ~ , ~ ~ 6 b 6I 6I 3; ~ ~ 1~t~` "6 :i7„ .s 1'a t. .~s~ =7 ~I I 111t F 1- ~5r1a s~ - aa3~~ as r3 ~a is is~~~ci ~ -I , ~ ^~ ,I MI .I ,I M . ~a ;_ ~ ir' a p,1"g s~ a .. syii iii ssir ,_ ~ t si~ i1~~ fi = j i£ii tt1~ itii€ ii i3 ~ ~~~ ~ ~i~~ ~! ~ 1 733 is=~ j=tca ~~ ~~ 3e ~1~ ? Itys#r is i ~ ~yij =-~] ~s=~a ~~ -t ~~ ~ a 1i i~'~~t~ )1 ~ ~ t7 rya; s~ i~ s~ ~rj` 9 b~J~f 8s ~ i ~~~ ~~t~ ~=~3e j- ~~ 1~ nTi~~ ~~ ap"ay~ ~! a = tai~a e~yt ri ~s~ ai :i ct jr_ ~ i ~s ti - i t1a T .~~s [a~~ 31 -1 -'- ~- ~_', y~s~i 3' is t ~~a 'ii~ ~c~s~ =1 ~s si ~~3~ -i '_~. 3 ? ~ t-~~~ ~~ta ~=ggam ~~ } j e3 is~ ~s ~~~~~ ~~ ~ * ~J1rii ais~ ;rsti W"~ ,~~ ~~ viii :! ~~~1° 43~ d~ ~ ~'~g' ~si a~_~=~ ,. yii I I \ agaf iE !s; - wF, i~bfY = ~ 9 ° _ 'E~ 'EZ 'i" 9!- ~ -' L~Fg iii 6ss - ~~ S;iY {{ 25 _ 6_ =;~ ~Y ;Y L ~ ~~ n ~"c$ $` x-a 3 a~ ~ s ? ~? ?ems -s sy z r ti8a ~s == s °Y ~s _~~~ ~s ?sF !~ ~ ;sf. es _z a .~ ~ a;. ~~ ~ .. ot~~d 'ai a~~ r #~ zisgr iy yy €a _ ii' ~ IYY# ~'xa 'y s° ~ a= ; "~ - x a: .W . - Y ~.: Z :' g! ' ~~ $ vi ~a s 3`! ~_ iy 1 .! .. ~_~ Y j ~~ .s - ! a a4 , ~ :a i i:e "s= ~ 5 ` .4~ d~ ~ ,_ ~y aid ~~ ~ ! 8Y1 :~ ~//~- IT T i- T-~ !~ ~a .3 , 1 ~~ !3 ~ o u 53 .r s* ~~ :ati a~"she sa ~_ $8C ~~a~7 9~ a-z 3.0 ~3pia'; ~~' ~x5 A3 ~:y ~~ =ss ~~~ Y~_ss ;~ i ~1f 33~ ~~s~ a~ #13 s-~ __~~- ia~ .~~ , n ? :..; ~sFlx .$r o_t ~~ \1 z V N n a ~~. -:~ ~b SY~ ~h~ fe ~_ ~~S Ye,. ~€ a~~ `C ~S~ 9Y3 fis~ i-- Yh -°y ~i .os ~I F:fiD _Ff ~ ~:° Y ~a# Yj~ h B7~ ~ 6 'b.~~ ;~' ~ '3 I ~ Y t stfis j 3h~ s ~ 3~n ~ k ~ e 6 g ;.~ ~~~ ~ ° Y ~ ~ ; i - BY~ i~oi Y~t~ =a'3 ~ ~~ ~a~~ ~ ~~ e e ~' 3 . ~ _ .ta; }9 ~i f4 ~ j ~~ ~~ ~[~ s~p; aii~ ~~ aBj ~f ?~ a~ i a ~~ •I _ ~I ~~I a «I ~i3 ~~~ sY ra s{ 36 °•_ ~ 3 hf ; ° 32 -' .~ sY. ' ~'f 9 S 23 b_ =~~ {( f9~ -: ~Y e=. :YS 9 _s~l~ s'~ r~ :i i ~~! BB :Y3 7~ 3~3 EE '~h € a s;,~ yy ~`i ~Yr ~ =w E` :gBY m i:? .I YSY .,I Y~X ~I - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~cnar STAFF REPORT ~~' ~~.~ r' p ILA ~ U I; DATE: August 14, 1987 ts~~ 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EN VIRONNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 - CITATION - ppea o e ann ng omm ss on s ec s on approv ng a total residential development of 74 single family lots on 32.6 acres of land 1n the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Located on the east side of East Avenue at Catalpa Street - APN 227-071-07, 11 and 20. Associated with the proposal is Tree Removal Permit 87-44 - A request to remove 270 Eucalyptus Globulus (Blue Gum) trees. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the pro ec after receiving all public input and testimony, the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, dental of the appeal would be appropriate. II. BACKGROUND: On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission unanimously approved Tentative Tract 13063. During the meeting, the ma,)or issue of discussion centered around the treatment of East Avenue. An area resident stated concern with the proposed 5-1/2' decorative block wall and that he hoped some open spaces would remain. The Planning Commission stated that the block wall was necessary to protect the site from noise impacts generated from East Avenue as 1t is developed into a four lane, secondary arterial. Following the Planning Commission meeting, two appeals were filed, one questioning the tree removal and the other raising concerns about the entire tract including tree removal. III. ANAL'iSIS: a. Tree Removal: Nith the adoption of the Etiwanda Specific an, special regulations were lnoluded Lo perpetuate a windbreak system in Etiwanda. fie intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan is the "gradual replacement and expansion of the system through planting of new Spotted Gum Eucalyptus windrows along the established grid pattern." -'tis concept fs illustrated in Exhibit "A". The planning Commission required replacement windrows along the north and east site boundaries. In addition, a north-south windrow would be planted along East Avenue. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TT 13063 - CITATION August 19, 1987 page 2 The Specific Plan identifies several key areas of Etiwanda where Nature windrows are to be preserved along malor streets (see Exhibit `B"). These areas, however, are outside the Baits of the proposed tract. The Specific Plan also hakes provisions for existing windrows that are located along or within future public streets that are not required to be preserved. This relates to the tract frontage along Highland Avenue and samil areas within the tract. The Specific Plan states that these trees shall be reanved and replaced with new street trees. Highland Avenue, for example, would be replanted with a windrow style tree. To assist Lhe Planning Ca~isston in addressing the tree Issue, a report prepared by a certified arborist had bem submitted (see attached). The report indicated that a ma,)ority of the trees (72S) are 1n a very poor condition and, if allowed to stand, may very well Decaaw! a hazard. The report identifies four reasons for the proposed reapval of the trees: 1. Trees that are dead or gytng. 2. Trees that are malformed or so damaged as to be beyond feasible repair. 3. Trees that are deemed hazardous as to condition or 4. Trees that are crowding abetter tree. The report also indicates that there are no long stretches of windrow that are acceptable for preservation. Based on this information, the Planning Commission felt that removal of the Blue Gum Eucalyptus now and replacing them with Spottem Gum Eucalyptus would improve the longevity and integrity of the windrow system in Etiwanda. As a result, the Planning Coioission approved removal of the existing trees and required replacement around the perimeter of the tract to provide a physical and visual cutllne of the protect to ;tve it a sense of unity. ~~S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TT 13063 -CITATION August 19, 1987 Page 3 EUCALYPTUS WINDROW EVALUATION SUMMARY FOR TRACT 13063 Based on March 1 and May 14, 1987 Arborist Reports by James M. Griffin Trees per Row Raw Nuaber 1 73 2 45 3 9 4 25 5 25 A 85 B 12 ToUI 274 NUMBER TREES TO BE SAYER VS. REMOVED RON SAVED* REMOVED % SAVED % REMOVED 1 7 66 10% 90% 2 19 26 42% 588 3 2 7 22% 78S 4 23 2 92% 88 5 16 9 64% 36% .. .. ,. ,,. .D,;, Total 76 198 PERCENT 28z 72s *Indicates to be pruned. B. Tract Design: The second letter of appeal, in addition to -the free removal, suggests other areas of concern. These areas included perimeter walls, lot configuration, house placement on lots, side setbacks, waste disposal, and traffic circulation. Because the concerns outlined in the submittal appeal are general and are difficult to specifically address, the following analysis will try to highlight the mafor elements of the appealed items. 1. Perimeter Nalis: Nish the tract approval. wells were requ re a ong East Avenue, Highland Avenue, and the southern tract boundary. The walls along East Avenue and Highland Avenue were required based on an acoustical analysis submitted. The report stated that in order to acM eve a reduction in the noise levels to w11th1n the range required by the Development Code and General Plan, /,~/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TT 13063 -CITATION August 19, 1987 page 4 a 5-I/2 foot wall along East Avenue and a 6-1/2 foot wall along Highland Avenue would have to be constructed. The wall along the south tract boundary will provide a buffer between the residences and Etiwanda High School. The actual design and layout of the walls and landscaping were deferred until amore specific plans were submitted. 2. House Plottin /Lot Orientation; As the house plottings wen rou a es gn ev ew process, variation in the front yard setbacks was determined to be inadequate. First the Design Review Committee and then the Planning Commission required additional variation in front yard setbacks to create a more desirable streetscape. East Avenue is a secondary arterial and the Etiwanda Speciftc Plan prohibits driveway from being any closer than 300' apart. Therefore, lots are oriented with the rear of the units towards East Avenue. Circulation: Nhile only one public street access is prov a ong East Avenue, the overall Master Plan for the area will provide an additional connection to East Avenue, as well as providing connections to adjacent properties. The access points to East Avenue have been limited with the tract due to the future expansion of East Avenue to a four-lane, secondary arterial. By limiting the number of access points, the potential traffic conflict opportunities can be minimized. uweii iuy~ i, milt uy unw iaaL Avenue wi ur uriveways, for example, would result 1n a substanttai increase in traffic movement conflicts. Also, in addition to the one access off of East Avenue, an emergency access is provided off of Highland Avenue to allow emergency vehicles two means of access Into the tract. 4. Haste Disposal: The appeal expresses concern about the propose was a d15Dosa1, public sewer or private systems for the site. At this time, no specific plans have been submitted to address this issue. In the past, lots of this size have been permitted to use private disposal systems provided adequate ground percolation is present. This will be determined at a later date. sf~ctfull~"~ o d, /~ // 1 / City anner BB:SM:ko Attachments: Letters of Appeal Arborist's Report (,~ 7 Planning Commission Minutes Planning Cawaission Staff Report Exhibit "A" - New Nlndrow Planting Guidelines ,..t .8. ~ _. ~_ Baml[a & l;itc l[ie ..T10fl MCT5 qT y.W JAHES BANKS JR TN OMI9 B FITCNIE July 15, 1987 ~~ .Y ~~_l City Clerk City of Rnncho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Cucamonga, California 91730 i_ .. \. ...~ ._ I. E .L :~~~~ SVITC i20 CIVIC GCNf[fl LAW Of IIC [3 loses avm c[Nxw onw[ P~NCryO CYCAMONO I.. Ce LIfOfl N1A 91»O mq oeo~oely R6: Tract 13063 - Citation, APN 227-071 -07, 11 and 20 Dear Clerk: Enclosed ie a check for one hundzed twenty six dollars ($126.00) which ie your fee for an appeal Prom the decision of the Planning Commission mnde 8 July 1987, agenda item D1. Although we have several concerns and do not wish to have the appeal limited to any particular aspect of the tract, our primary concerns at this time are: 1. the periaeter walls; 2. windbreak replacement requirements; 3. lot configuration, house placement on lots, aiAo Rathark~. h. waHte disposal; 5. traffic circulation. Please note our apppeal and inform me of the hearing date before the City Council. ncerely,~~~~' amea n e, ~L~ cc: i,ary Collins, Ray Trujillo encl: check CJN OF HgNCHO CUC ~ ADMINISTRp71~ONGA ~ JUL 181987 7~a~at)11~9~i8 1 4'/ ~ }~ C7iY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA /.~ <. -~t~,"L4~' 9 LX-O raw Omv ba ta9, auto C1~. raYfw~n 91130, I11t19tF1t31 July 17, 1967 City Clerk City of Ra3lc ha Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Ranclro Cucamonga, California 91730 Oear Beverly: I hereby appeal the Planning Cotwission decision which approved Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 13063 and Tree Removal Perwit 87-44 (Citation Builders), and request discussion with the City Council in re ferellce to the removal of 270 Eucalyptus 6lobulas (blue gum). Si ncSrely, Pamela J. Mright _. ` ,~;-a Councilwoman PJN/dja '7~ / c.Rn.,..3,~ •v t)elwnh N. Bm.n lemT3 IUN Senn„LSWW [Auln 1. ava9«11 Ptm91t1 Wnya on w.,y. Gunn M. Ww9,mtn JAMES M. GRIFFIN LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT !7141 496-1952 34082 PEQUITO DRIVE .DANA PORJT, CALF. 92629 EUCALYPTUS WINDROW EVALUATION in CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tract 19063 1... Prepared fors ROBERT WATKINS WATKINS REALTY INC Tree Evaluation BV~ James M Griffin Arborist 3-i-86 ~' ~ ~, rye !- , P"Y ~ .'~: ~~~ _9 s r,t.c ~ F't a., , ~ 1,} u ti s F:......a ..«,. .. ... D ~j'i ~.P to i.. r tv.1 fib.: k~L.+ " - ~ ; :'i'- `~ ~ ~ ~ 1 t Y r ~ 71.41., [F 7777"",• _ .a . :. ~aR.k~~s e j4 y , i( ~~ G CITf OF RANCHO CUCUMONGA EUCAL'~PTUS WINDROW EVALUATION ' 1. 'TRACT: 13-063 2. TREE ROWS: n 2.1 thru 2.4 A & B . j. EXISTING g'aF!rc. IN ROW: 3_S 1 .through 73 3.2 1 .through 27 3.3 1 .through 9 3.4 1 .through 25 7.A 1 .through AS 7.A 1 .through 12 - li. TREE SIZE: (estimated range in inches diameter, takin¢ into account the marry multiple trunks) 4.1 Less than 6" 4.2 6" to 12" 4.3 12" to lA" 4.4 18" to 24" 4.5 24" to 76" 4.6 36" to 48" ' 4.7 48" to 60" 4.8 more than 60". K. 3E670VAL RECOMMENDATIONS (gustificatione for) 5.1 Troc noaA nn n..:..- ~_up 5.2 Tree Malformed or so Damaged as to be Pev^nd Feasible Repair. 5.3 Tree Deemed Hazardous as to Condition ~• ~^ *o Location. ?~COhihlEt7DED PRUNING PRACTICES: ,. STUMP DISPOSITION 7.1 Stump to be Removed 7.2 Stvmp to be severed to near grade and so left. (Intent to reduce bank and soil erosion.) Accumulated Data and' Summary Pollows . h t'~ ' • y. f t: :~ ~ V~ r ~ :..~ .~~/ !. L ~ : ^ # ~'! 'e ! '2' ~CCOMiLATBD DATA Trees that were believed to be within the scope of the City Ordinance N37 were numbered via metal taggs attached to the tree trunks. Data was collected that had bearing on the evaluation factors. In brief. they ors as fallows~ Tree Rows Trees in each Raw Tree Sites Justlficationa for Removals Recoamsnded Pruning Practices Total number of treat loggedi Trees per Row ~ Row Iluabar 1 73 2 z7 3 9 4 25 A 85 R 12 Comaariada between Treae To Be Pruned /Trees To Be Removed ^nwr p....w~d o~~~.._~ i - 9•• W66.... 2 10 17 3 2 7 4 23 2 A 9 76 H o 12 51 1 0 On a percentage Daais the distribution Sa as follawa~ 1 2 j 4 A B Prune 1 37 2 9 11 Remove g0R bj¢ 7eK 08~ e9~ 100'1. Overall Distributions Prune 22f~ Raove 7~ (~~°1 -7- It should be noted that there may be as many as 100 additional trees in n windrow paralleling Rowa A and B. (along the eaaterly wash area). They appear to be outside the Tract 17-067) and are so damaged by fire and erosion ne to De worthless. The tree row N4 (along Highland Avenue) is the only stand of merit within the Tract.(27 out of 25 being usable. The majority of the trees (180) are in very poor con- dition and, if allowed to stand, may very well become hazardous. These trees (recommended for removal ,have been marked in the field by red dots on the trunks. These red •dota are as represented in the enclosed Loas. The very bad condition of these Eucalypts may be due to env one, or ell, of the following factors. The plantings were larglY felled at some time, - leaving only the stumps which ware then fired, but only partially consumed. The result has been a regrowth at the base. This sucker growth is poorly attached and constit- utes a probable point of breaking awav that will be hazardous. The stumps continue to decay and the haaard increases. 'Phose trees adjacent to the eaaterly wash eras (rows A and B) have loot anchorage, have been undermined and are sub- ject to toppling. In regard to those trees within the Tract where a rec- ommendation~ to prune has Deen made it is i~i$ely that' there may be additional weakening damage below ground level that cannot be detected at this time. Nance, a recommendation to prune is not intended to infer that there is a belief that the tree (or trees) is free from haaard. ~,~~ 3 ADDENDUN REPORT EUCALYPTUS WINDRONS CITY OP RANCHO CUCUM6NGA Z. Row # 2 Continuation 'r Numbers 28 thru 45 Aemo~•e 9 (28-30-31-32-33-34-35-36-37) _~une o (29-38-39-40-41-42-43-44-45) Trees recommended for Removal are mostly regrowth from stumpages are defective, will never form good trees and may,in fact, become hazardous. Those recommended for ni and retention.are small, mostly single trunk and may de•relope nto fair trees. Time and care ;~ spent on them may not be time and care well spent. New clean plantings properly selected for the location and use may De the more desirable alternative. Note that marry small trees exist in the area near the East Street row end. These trees are below minimal size and are, in fact Jun . II. Row 5 (An added row, adjacent to the School yard fence.) (Frees numbered 1 thru 25 ) Removals 9 (96~); Trees 3-5-11-12-17,20-21-24-25) Prune id (506) (Trees 1-2-4-6-~-8-9-10-13-14-15-16-1e-19-22-25) Trees recommended for pruning are not regrowth from stump- age but are generally in poor condition with serious visible weakneeaea sad algae of stress. The liklihood of of root ens heart rota is suspected. Those trees labeled for removal have defeats serious enough to constute hazard, are dying, or are unduly crowdng better trees in the row. Disclaimer The recommendation to prune does not infer a belief that tt trees are neceeaarily tree from defects and hence~safe• L~~ -2- Addendam^. (continued) ~~ 5. Removal Recommendations (Justifications for) adds 5.4 Crovrding a Better Tree (>. Prunintc Practices 6.1 Remove dead or dying Mood 6.2 Remove unsightly or poorly crotched limbs - 6.7 Thin out interlacing broaches and suckers 6.4. Cut back ovt of scale bx'anchea 6.$ Pollard to reduce haaardous conditions. '::= . ,.'. _ t±,-. ~p .: _~ .. 4 ~ S - .a~=. W W 3~ r 0 y. N ~~ I~ C7 w W eW = 3r Q N ~'I C N ~/ W O M p„ _ C , ~ O L `~ W U Z a - ~ ~ ~ o w ~ ~ = w f ~ - - ¢ ~ z ~ -,~ W N N W a1 W W 3 ~ o ~ o ~ ~ C ~ 1~ ~, P N ~, r n. ~~ ~~ ~o~ ~ _ .: _ . _. _. I _T-'ice. ~~~3[1NT3Ad tS~'3 DRAFT OR DISC! ~55'.ON PURPO5~5 ONLY issioner Eeerick stated, in light of Mr. ArcywnskT's caements, he wou change his vote. Ne would like to hold open the possibility that the a licant could come back aid sake a stronger showing of hardship that he an't develop the property in an appropriate manner and that if the reque for variance wasn't as dramatic as this, he eight De core amenable to ranting a variance, he did not want to foreclose hie for one year. CamAissioner Eeer roved to undo the prior resolution with respect to denying the varian Coeeissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion was carried by following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LAKESLEY, EMERICK, MLNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHI EA, TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried As a point of clarification, Chairean MtNiel stated this gives the applicant the opportunity to work with sta on the CUP and the variance and it will be continued to August 12, 1987. Chairean Mc Niel reopened the public hearin upon the counsel of Arcywnski> Sixe there were no coements, public hearing was the closed. Cameissioner Emerick coved to continue the Conditional Use Permit and variaxe request by the applicant to August 12, 1987. Caw•issioner Tolstov seconded the cotton. Motion was carrieA by r.h. fnl ring uqt.• AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHiTIEA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~ --carried x : ~ ~ w Commissioner Chitiea clarified her "No' vote in regards to the vari, issue. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 - CITATION - A of land in the Low Density Residential District-(2-4 dwelling units per ac re 1, within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, leafed on the east side of East Avenue at Cata1D: Street - APN 227-071-07,11, and 20. Associated with the Droposal is Tree Removal Der~it 87-44 - A request to remove 270 Eucalyptus globules (Blue Gum) trees. o ~aFT FOR Dt:;CUSS;ON PURPOSES ONLY Planning Comeissian Minutes 17 Juty 08, 1987 Y ~ 7 FoR Dl- C'~AFT .~CUSgION PURPOSE:';. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. clarified that Condition •5, N-19, regarding the decorative block wall along Etiwanda High School site should be modified to state minimun heighth shall be sfx feet. He also indicated that Design Review recanaends the additional use of rock or brick into the front elevations of the buildings. The Design Review Committee felt it should be more extensive and that a condition of approval should be included. CosmiT ssioner Chitiea questioned the City Engineer about the iten of flood control that needed to be addressed. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated, as a point of inforwwtion, that this tract is in the upper Etiwanda drainage area (Subarea 6). !n order for it to develop as areas to the north, it needs the use of the Victoria Retention Basin, which is the property of the flood control district. Engireering has been working with thus for sane tine and have worked out Host of the problems. The Basin will be improved to an extent that it will be usable in conJunction to the construction with the second phase of the Day Creek pro,{ecL and the extension of the channel north of the basin to which this particular one will drain directly in will be constructed as part of Phase I, Etiwanda drainage improvements. He noted that these protects will take at least eight months to one year and three months to complete and both must be in place and operation before we can allow this tract to connect and develop Mr. Jerry Litton, representing the applicant, Citation Builders, requested clarification fron the City Engineer regarding the basin. He accepts the condTtlons Tn the resolution. Mr. Gary Collins, 13125 Catalpa Street, Questioned the five foot wall on Last Avenue stating there are sore open spaces which he hoped to see remain. Commissioner Chitiea asked Mr. Collins if there were any neighborhood meetings conducted. Mr. Collins said he had read a sign stating the meeting, but his primary concern was the wall. In response to a question from Chairman Mc Niel, Scott Murphy stated the requirement for the aa11 is the result of the acoustical report and the necessary mitigation when East Avenue is improved and other parcels developed. Commissioner Chftiea stated that the orientation as to Having the block walls facing on to East Avenue was not considered. Commissioner Enerick in response to Mr. Co111n's comment on the wall stated the reason the developer decided to lots to the west direction was because of engineering concerns having driveway accesses on East Avenue, which 1s a much busier street W1aa .dr ial streets such as B Street, ~, , „~~~ F.^.^n D:~CU~S!O:`l PURPOSES Planning Commission Minutes 18 July O8, 1987 ~~ g DRAFT FoR Discussloy pu;~voSS s Ovt. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated that East Avenue is designatedFa four lane secondary arterial street. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner E,aerick questioned whether the sidewalk would be right along the wall, could we soften the wall. Barrye Nanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated it was a standard 12 foot parkway and sidewalks are traditionally at the wall in the city. Commissioner Emerick felt that sidewalks against the wall are unattractive and there seems to be broken glass since people throw bottles up against walls. Me felt there may be away to soften the wall by indentationz in the wall, especially to the Etiwanda area. Cowissioner Biakesley agreed with Commissioner Emerick stating he did not like the sidewalk on the street nor right adjacent to the wall, Chairman MtNtel questioned the depth of the lots. Scott Murphy responded 129 feet. Coawissioner Emerick questioned who would maintain the area outside wa111 Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated the parkway would already he conditioned into the existing landscape maintenance district. Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that the developer work with the staff and there be a landscape easement sufficient enough to help mitigate the impact of the wall to the street. Coamissioner Emerick agreed with the City Planner and felt the design and plant materials should be low mafntenance and drought resistant to minimize the City's cost of maintenance and lower our water usage through time. Comwissianer Chitiea appreciates Mr. Collins' concern for the character of Etiwanda, however, the subject of safety as well as noise factors justified the City to retain this particular configuration for the site plan. She was in favor fn allowing the most flexibility in allowing the applicant to work with the City Planner in redesigning the parkway to soften tho effect. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Mr. Litton stated there were only five lots affected aM it takes backyard space, but requested consideration since a major street would go through the project. They would appreciate as much rea, yard as they could get, They would work with staff on this issue. ~.. %i=1~ Planning Commission MinutesFOR DrI`~Sj\GU:iSiO:J PU::~~~~~--1987 7d~ D~aF-r FOR DIJC1;SgIp1V PURpJSES Mr. Richard Fuerestian, 8331 Utica, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the design for East Avenue is set out in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He was concerned that the Commission wants something different and wanted clarification on tots issue. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated staff would continue to use the Etiwanda Specific Plan and would make sure what is approved is consistent with the Etiwanda Plan. Mr. John Holt, 5335 Carnelian Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated back east it is not unusual to find a home turned around so the driveway comes Tn frae the hack, you could reorient the houses to face East Avenue, there's no law stating you have to come in from East Avenue. Chairman MtNiel closed the hearing. Commissioner Emerick moved adoption of the resolution with the modifications of added brick/rock to the front of the houu elevations and referral to staff the detailed landscape of wall plans for East Avenue. This may include the requirement of an additional landscape easement. In addition, make the 5 1/2 foot block wall along Etiwanda High School a minimum of 6 feet. Commissiener Tolstoy seconded the motion. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * --carried O.~NYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIYE TRACT 13541 - LANE - The e opmen o a o cus ^ su v s on on acres o and in the L Residential District 12-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista - APN 207-411- 10, 207-OBO- and 48. The applicant has also filed a Tree Removal Permit. Scott Murphy, Associate Pla r, presented the staff report. He stated that a number of letters rela to the protect had been received. A petition signed by 12 homeowner xpressed their concern about the connection of Sierra Vista to Red 1 Country Club Orive and their proposal is that Sierra VTzta became a -de-sac, The applicant has received copies of the letters and has revie them. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Foy D1-cu~si:.;a;FT POSES ~:. Planning Commission Minutes 20 July OB, 1981 ~~O nrmv nn n ~ wrnnn nr rn . vnvn . STAFF REPORT ~~~ ~.~ o Y Fi,~ ~ :J: i) DATE: duly 8, 1987 T0: Chairnlan and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 - o a res n a eve opmen o s ng e a~mil-y-Tots on 32.6 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units Der acre), within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, hated on the east side of East Avenue at Catalpa Street - APN 227-071-07, il, and 20. Associated with the proposal is Tree Removal Penult 87-44 - A request to remove 270 Eucalyptus globules (Blue Guo) trees. I. PROJECT AHD SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, conceptual grog plan, conceptual landscaping plan, bull ding elevations, detailed site pion, and issuance or a negative ueciara cion. B. Proj ect Density: 2.27 dwelling units per acre. C. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin or - acan ow ens y esidential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant and Etiwanda High School; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and High School East - Vacant; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Single Family Residential; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 0. General Plan Oesianations: ro ec e - ow ens y Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - High School East - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 1917 C,3~ ITEM N PLANNING COIMISSII aTAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 -CITATION duly 8, 1987 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The property is currently undeveloped wi an average 5 ope of roughly 3 percent from north to south. There are two significant Eucalyptus windrows on the site, one running east-west through the center of the site and one running north-south along the east property line, and three partial windrows running east-west in the northern portion of the tract. Etiwanda High School is located directly south of the site. The future Foothill Freeway right-of-wdy is located north of Lots 1 and 2. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 73 single fia~il-y~ots and a cannon lot that will be used as a tesporary access far esergency vehicles. The residential tots range in size from 10,338 square feet to 23,208 square feet 1n area with an average lot size of 15,077 square feet in area. In addition, the applicant is proposing four floor plans for this tract - Ywo single-story units, 1,820 and 2,041 square feet, and 2 two-story units, 2,380 and 2,777 square feet. Each floor plan has three basic elevations. Plans 1820 and 2380 have been adapted to incorporate detached garages on corner lots. B. Oesi9n Review CaawTttee• The Design Review Comaittee (Emerick, Tn1 .. C.... .-~ II..~TT-..., _. ..i ~~~• a uui.m, •icwcu tiic N, upunal allU Pe{,YWNCIIYBd approval subfect to the following conditions: 1. Variable front yard setbacks, 25 to 30 feet, should be provided through the tract. On Lots 6-10 and 16- 20, the front yard setbacks should vary from 25 to 35 feet. 2. Lots 1 and 2 should be single story for additional not se attenuation. 3. Along East Avenue, 3 single-story and 2 two-story units should be provided. 4. Streets "D" and "E" should be redesigned to provide a curvtitnear appearance. 5, Decorative block walls should be provided on all corner lots. 6. A decorative block wall should be provided along the south property line aQlacent to ELlwanda Nigh School. ~3 ~ PLANNI N6 CgMIS51L STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 -CITATION July 8, 1987 Page 3 7. Replacement windrows should be planted along the north and south site boundaries. 8. Shutters should be provided around the windows on Plans 2041 "A" and 2041 °C". 9. A rock planter should be provided an Plan 2041 "B" instead of rock veneer. 10. Nood corbels under eave overhangs in the porch area should be provided. 11. The front porch areas on Plans 2041 and 2380 should be expanded. 12. wood trim or plant-ons with stucco over should be provided around all windows. C. Tree Removal Perwit: The applicant has submitted a Tree emova erw app cation requesting the reaaval of 270 Eucalyptus globulas (Blue Gum) trees 1n con,)unction with development of the tract. An arborist report has been provided as part of the request. The report indicates that a ma,)ority of the trees (78 percent) are in very poor condition as a result of decay, fire and unstabie sucker growth and pose a nnrgnrt,! h..".~. rh_ ".^.rta 31~C f^..^',. that t,`,Oeo 'cc> that could be preserved by pruning may have additional weakening damage below grade. Based an this information, staff recommends that the existing windrows be removed and that replacement windrows De required. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp e e y e app can Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and identified that the proximity of the site to the future Foothill Freeway and East Avenue may result in excessive noise levels along the northern and western portions of the site. The applicant has provided an acoustical analysts addressing the potential noise impacts. Based on the results on the report, one of the following mitigation measures should be implemented to reduce the noise levels to a less than significant level: 1. A 5y foot berm and a 5 foot berm be placed along the northern and western tract boundaries, respectively, or ~.~3 PLANNING COMMISSIG, oTAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACt 13063 - CITATION July 8, 1987 Page 4 2. A 6§ foot barrier and a 54 foot barrier De placed along the northern and western tract boundaries, respectively. The barriers should be continuous structures without gaps or gates and should be constructed of a material that is impervious to no15e (i.e. concrete block, stucco-on-wood, k inch plate glass, earthen berm, or any combination of these materials). In order to comply with current City policy and, at the same time, to reduce the noise levels to a less than significant level, staff recommends that decorative block walls be constructed on the northern and western tract perimeters. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The protect is consistent with the General an an eve opmen Code. The protect, with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances ar significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are to compliance with the applicable provisions of the Etiwanda Specific P1 an, Development Code, and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Repost na"c nannn m,hli~ heani nn anA nnN roe ue nn• in al l .. owners within 300 feet of the protect site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve en a ve Tract 13063 through adoption of the attached /fte3)olut~n, approve Tree Removal Permit 87-44, and issue a Negative Brad B ter City tanner BB:SM:to Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "tl" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" -Conceptual Grading plan Exhibit "E" -Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G" -Master Plan of Trees Resolution of Approval with Conditions ~/3s~ i -- 6 _. j { `~ _ ~~ ~/ _ ~ 1~ , _i`___ 1; ~ ~ ~I - ~~ _ i_~__~J. ._ . t-.. __ ~~ -~ '4 ~_ ___.___ :-_ is 4 ~_-~ i 3 'I .' 11 y - ----- ~----l-.._,. ii . - ;~.. ~ . -- ~-i _ 5 ~ it ~: n .• ii r L cis o~ ~,~: ~ ~~ RAl~'CHO CL'CA1vIC+~\'GoA rrr~: s•,~~wzora/ P[11NN1~C', DtVlS10N U~SE`CHIOR':~/l ate: .. ~~, Y ~a..u~ -~ '_ ~ .w__Jl~/ t ~ ~~ I -y { ~ i. 5 *t..-:x... ~,~ ,~~ J Y UI'~r .... ~ a,..... , rl~~ __-~ ~..~. ._ C:. ...___ t~ ` ~ ~ .... .~.. ~ r.... ®9 ,~.. ~~ ~ l ~ ~ -- _ '-~--c ~ - ~,~: Y _•~ ~2-~-- r3 1 ~ A 1 ~~ P y. ?..I. ~ 4' __ .. ~~ - . .. - ~ -'mac i ~r~ 9~ tl ^/~~'J ~./l~ 1 ~1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG~1 ~.AtvNwc avts~oty ~, ~ ~.~~ /EXHIBIT B/ $~'q(E: 7 ~~ f ~ '~,~w- . ,- _ ~y _ r- -.- an ,Y. .!' _ `. '. ~ i '~ „ - --- --- --- - ~~__ -r.~. +f~ ~ ~ _ ~ l _ °'_____-w-~~ .--J -"-~ _ -. •~ l ~ - :_ r j iti u ~ ._ ~ MOR7':i CITY OF rte, ~ /.~~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~: ~-~ ,c,,qi, R.ntvtvavc otvaoiv ~.~, az ~, x/37 t ~` I~ __ ~~_ ~, C ci-r~r or• ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~'CI IO CL'CA1v10i1'GA rrr[,~: 'sue ~,. Pt.ntv~rt~c Dtwlav X13 ~ E~cHimr: ~ ~ „~ is ,~., :r ~~ ~ . ... ~ ~.. ~ ' ~ ~ - ~.~ i• r~, .`r'at ~ ~~ . } 1l ~ ~ ~ 9 l.~ , ~ ' '.r ~ i r '+~ --~ , - - - ~~ - .~ ~ ~ ~ i s-.c r-~- .. ~ sr t ., ~i ~~ ~ ^ _ .i y ~.~ y r1 . ~. _ .~ i / j O F-_. ~ ~ ~ i ~~,i~ i , U = ~ i ~ .. i ~ ~ ~-~-~: ~ ., i J f ;N' §~ 3j ~ ~ ~ n r -" s , ~ Y .r L.. ~ - ., ~ , ~ ,:1 : y~ . ~ , rr .~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ i ,~ ~ ' , 1 ;I:~ ~ ~ _r ~ I ~r { r y •~ ~~ 7 - .a L. - ~ , .y ' iii ~ j ~ ~ : G=el" / -- _~, CITE' Ol' rrr:al: _ ,'r -c.,1 R~\CHO CL;C~.~IC~\G~1 P(.AIY~II\C DfVLS10N rte, ,~,.,~~,~~ -~~ - , . ~3~ E~HIOR': r; ~,., . i~ I . ~~ ,4 I" ~ I i I ~ ,..---t-~ ,. ~.. ~i > a 4 L ~ ~ i ~! 1 i~ i _`, ;~ r •~ i~ ~ ,.,. r i i I v '', I ~ ~ i i i ( t ~ i _.___. .~ l CITY OZ' rrc~i: -- ~, R~`~\CHO CL'CA,~IOi\G~1 ,n,~: GoN,a~ PLAlYNI~G D(VISlON y~O E`CHf01T: ~' ~~, . CITY OF RAn'CHO CL'CA1~IC1\GA P(.ANNi~ DNLSION ~F~G/ 17'E\I: --~L~'o3 TR'LE~ ELE/.a~D.c~ ~, ~, r k CITY Ol RA1~'CHO CL'C.~1NI0-\G~- rt'[~i: ~r i ~ ~ E~CF T. .C •. ~ .. C CITY OI~ RA~'~CHO CL'C~-,~IC~\'G~, P[Aiv~t6~C DtvlnON ~~G3 rrt~ _ ~E/.ari~/ E~CHIDIT:, ~~ c-, :. ~ .. p C CITY~OI' ITEM is ~~ i~~ ~ RL~CHQ Cj.C1~1~01\(ie~ TiT1E: FFV.4rroN PL.AiV~If~G DN15I0[Y ~~ E'Ch 1'. c « ~~HI Y'~ CITY OP R.A1~'CHO CL;C.~~101\G~ PCA~Wi l~ DNLSION ~fUS ~~ ~: --,%r i~ 3 TrR.EI _~-w4rioy" .',, r r CITY OF RAI~CfiO CI;Cr11V10~\'GA Ptluv~t~c aivisiav Uu~ rre~ is EKHlW1':. ~ c s~~ r. !~ ~~ i~ 1~, 1 ~ Y i d9li ~ i u \~ Q t 1 ~ _.- ~ - i ~~._... ~~ j., ,. ,f . ~ °, ~, ~ ,: ~i ~~. ~ a i~ i i', .•__l I. _ ~ -s l`~ii ~li' ~~~ iP n~ 1 ~ - ~ '~ tli `' ~a ~ ~-- - - - =~Irn~ -----~-- ~ __ . cur - 'L" r ~ ~-.=-r.-..,. ,~ CITY OI' rrc~ is ~ i.~a ~ RAI~'CHO CL'CA,~IO~\'C«~ // // Tm.e~ ~.~, PI.ANNf~\'G DIVLSIO(Y yu7 E'CHI[>rf~ r; <-~ :. RESOLUTION N0. 87-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMAISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT IMP N0. 13063 HHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13063 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Citation Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdivfding the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 32.6 acres of land into 74 lots located on the east side of East Avenue at Catalpa Street (APN: 227- 071-07, 11 and 20 ), regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on July 8, 1987; and NHEREAS, the City Planner has recammeMed approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and NHEREAS, the Planning Coawission has read aM considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOM, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Coeission makes the following findings in regard to en a ive Tract No. 13063 and the Map thereof: la) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; lb) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (cl The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wfidlife or their habitat; !e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired Dy the public at large, now of record, for access through or use ~f the property within the proposed subdivision. Y(~~ PLANNING COMMI55IC IESOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 13uo3 - CITATION July 8, 1987 Page 2 {g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the envirenment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13063, a copy of which is attached e~,is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Variable front yard setbacks, 25 to 30 feet, should be provided throughout the tract. On Lots 6-10 and 16-20, greater variation in front yard setbacks, 25 to 35 feet, shall be provided. Revised site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Lots 1 and 2 should be stogie story for greater noise attenuation. 3. Along East Avenue, 3 single-story and 2 Lwo-story units shall be provided. 4. Streets "D" and "E" should be redesigned to provide a curvilinear appearance. The revised tract map shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner nrinr hn rernMaffnn ni fha final aun 5. Decorative block walls, minimum six (6) foot high, should be provided on all corner side yards and along the south tract boundary adjacent to Etiwanda High School. In addition, a 6~ foot decorative block well shah be provided along the northern tract boundary and a minimum 51a foot decorative block wall shall be provided along the western tract boundary W reduce noise impacts to a less than significant level, The location and design of the walls shalt be shown on the final landscape plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Replacement windrars {Eucalyptus nwtculata at g Feet on center) shall be planted along the north and east site boundaries. The trees Shalt be indicated on Lhe final landscape plan which is subject to Lhe review and approval of the City Planner. U~9 PLANNING COMMISSIC '.ESOLUTION N0. TENTATIYE TRACT 13~~3 - CITATION July 8, 1987 Page 3 8. The following items shall be incorporated into the revised building plans which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Dlanner prior to the issuance of building permits: a. Shutters shall be provided around the windows on Plans 2041 "A" and 2041 "C". b. A rack planter shall be provided on Plan 2041 .g" c. Mood corbels shalt be provided under the eave overhangs in the porch area of all elevations. d. The front porch area of Plans 2041 and 2380 shall be expanded to the satisfaction of the City Planner. e. Mood trim or plant-ons with stucco over shall be provided around all windows where shutters are not to be used. f. Additlenal brick of rock shall be incorporated into the front elevations. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building cermi ts. 9. Additional Landscaping shall be provided between the sidewalk and Lhe wall along East Avenue to soften the impact of the wall. A landscape easemw'nt shall be required to al law for City maintenance of the additional landscape area. The easements shalt be annexed into the landscaping district. Engineering Division; 1. Overhead Utilities: a. Highland Avenue - Are in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Highland Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the F1na1 Map. The fee s,.all be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the lenyth of the project frontage adjacent to Highland Avenue. Y PLANNING COMMISSION .iOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 13063 - CITATION July 8, 1987 Page 4 6. East Avenue - The existing overhead utilities (telecossunications and electrical) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage, including the "out" parcel, extending to the first pole off site (north and south), Drior to public isprovesent acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Partial reisbursesent of one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding fro future developsent as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is feasible free the presently undeveloped properties. 2. The stores drainage fees Shall be paid prior Lo recordation of the final sap. 3. The developer shall construct the street isprovesents in front of the "out" parcel on East Avenue to the satisfaction of the Lity Engineer. 4. Lot "A" shall be designed and constructed as follows: a. To accassodate tesporary eser9ency vehicles fray ~...a,.,.... .,, w" cr...~• q"n b. To provide flood protection t0 lots 1 and 2 fros overflow fros Highland Avenue. 5. All off-site drainage easesents shall be obtained to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to recordation of the final sap. 6. All off-site tesporary grading easesents shall be obtained t0 the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to recordation of the final sap. 7. Notice of intention to fors and/or join the lighting and landscapiny district shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the sap or issuance of building persits, whichever occurs first. 8. Catalpa Street shalt De constructed to collector standards, i.e. 66 foot right-of-way with a 44 foot curb separation centered on the existing portion to the east. ~/S~ PLANNING COMMISSION 'SOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 1300.. - CITATION July 8, 1987 Page 5 9. The vertical alignment of "C" and "H" Streets shall be designed to accommodate the future development of the property to the east. 10. Off-site storm drain facilities from the tract to Victoria Basin shall be constructed as approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of construction of any storm drain lines designated on the City Storm Orain Master Plan in accordance with City Ordinance No. 25. 11. The developer shall bear all costs incurred (including condemnation proceeding) in the acquisition of the off-site right-of-wdy required for storo drain facilities, if it is not acquired by some other means prior to recordation of the final map. An agreement to this effect between the developer and the City shall De executed prior to recordation of the final map. 12. An easement shall be obtained from the School District for drainage to their property prior to recordation of the final map. 13. The developer shall participate in required improvements Lo Yic toria Basin as reeui red b_v tha Flood Control District. 14. Provide desalting basins for drainage from the site to the north as approved by the City Engineer. 15. The final drainage study shall address all concerns identified in the review of the initial drainage study dated May, 1987. All necessary drainage facilities shall be provided including the elevating of pads along the east tract boundary as required by the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COI'MISSION OF THE CITY OF RAN CUCAMONGA / /-~ ~ 8Y: ~ ~~i/./~L 7 . ~ l 7 7~ ~ -L ~/5 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION SOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 1306a -CITATION July 8, 1987 Page 6 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coawission of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaaanga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly a~ regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coa~TSSion of the City of Rancho Cucaeonga, at a regular ieeeting of the Planning Loa~aission held on the 8th day of July, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: BYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~!S 3 0 z 0 =tj$g`Y~yt S.E'sio=Eo~l~ Y~=h"igi 3~y; g¢ i~L~i ~~; iEe~t~g~y~4= a.ae~~~ag=§i ~~i sa fl E ~? t x 's?a: yY~~. ~fi~~~ ie fi ~< <~; ~i+•1~ YL d '-~ :;Y E~ESE E"i„D ~j~ :~€~i ~~L j~ ~3sgi ~3iYY §3-:i ;;~ ~~ZYY e~i ~~I~S i.- .a _ Sj 'E~. goy s :Y $$.Y fig: Fi_+% g: i Sl-~ _t l =le=i "sa! s=~yq_r ~~a -~ls s!! 3~ i~ S=ii 2 ~ias'3 al$ _<~~~~t Yi;a e s s r .~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ 1Y .: , . .. a d~ :~ ~ Y L ~ ~g 3 1. !. ~2E ° 3 Y d. .3 e `€~ ! !: s E ~ 6E i. ~ a 3d ~: £ ?~ E Y ~:l a : j 8 ~.. ~3: ~ ~ t ~. t. I1{ -•I ~& 11I ryl ^I _ ~I ~5`f Y $E .:a lst ~~~ E € s~ .: ~a ~~ T~ u v 0 0 ~g9= y ~Y~kEtYgB. °~Ya ~8.• E}58e~fa '~ ~ ~• ~~~~ 2v9 E5 S ^^_a ~~.e~~aSS :iEd g~Y .S xo Y~Ejs ±g0ig3E~3N s ~ _ _$~ n_Y"s e ,~~g' ~bx~~ Y~ii3iaa~ ^~ ~~ :=3 rEEE .~ ?.M~ 8~"!~_ " "3 ..8$a ~~ ~ °•_ `x~ Eso~e , >, i-a.~~ o.~~abE yew-ELF .ai _ $y°, r Egg ~ ~ g~~3 ~3 5g eS ~i SL .t ;oY ~ aE~~ Eb _- ~° ~ 5 a5: ~s:_ Li ^= 8g °~S Y ~ 'o.. ~~bE .S ~~~, gY g~9j .F e $'S: E~ ~ gg°' gV~ v3 ~ Fc'~ E-~~ 7~ TY°~. i ~ y ' oa s~ F n, ;~ as ; ~ ~ aa s gg~~_ 38l~ ~'~ ~€ D .? u:'~3 = =~ _ " ! ~c < si i °I ~I ~I MI N °is°s"s ~e _€ _g9 ~y *SE w3-e ~ ^£~ i~Yg - yid -__- bra -;~ _- e~x o[` Pie ;as ~~, °~ °; gyp. +~ r yj "Y' b Sy.:~ .Zb k ~g?'g _E~ ~# ~"ys':~ as yFSE 'kc,~x gas`°s ~ 5 ~, ~~. -=~,; F "s°~ ._s;-a o ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ C/~~~~ -1 ES:`o ~fi E 5~ fi" SfiBBL`~S~'9 ~ 59ae .•^ ii: EE E "i .g ~Sfi g-fi..°? h ~_i ~~ ~Og3 E.p ` 8 I 2 :s °~ i'fi' 9fit _~ .Ce_ "gt3 9. E= - F '~E~ ,fi A S ~~„. „'E . z° r ,..E g..~ = :EA 2F _~a~~Y.~.B ~ ~ x~ 5a~ N 8; 8°^ C~ SS°g~"9E E -~ E~Efi_ _» _$ - E "°-_ v ° s R I E: _pi~ E -- ° ~a SH § .t ES$~:'~E fi=ns~ iE il1 Sfi o.~+ '.~ ES= :- x _gRg:E s'F= ;,~%SE iS ~"~^~' ~,~R Z~8 n i< $$_"'S3;~ g ~ : Yg ~ $ s la pL - ~ ;~ d~ , $i ~'~ ~ -x~z=x '-~" ~e~ ~i ^_~ ~x2 a~ ~ ~~ sEa,a ~ 3-a a ~ is ra „_:s: ._ :~ ~.. ~e3 ~« em3~ Y F 3 :-; fi$3i= ~~ I +~ ^I ~~ ~w~ ~r~ -~ 0 _d '" '~ a ~ "~~ 7° a E; [ RE 3~L Y ,~. 8 a S : ~ y E _e °°Y 4E °E - °® fiCfr ~~ ~~.~ f~S3 aE _ E S -Y+ SE Y° yfi~ 2v~ ~ .. E.va `a. -`g9~ '35:~ ° `1 SAP W „~3 :2 ..~ ;8fi 6 g~~e ~.;~Lg g9~ S ~. _ ~ ~s~ gigs, =~; ~ ~ ~=,~° „~~ - re u va ~•o a:=3" ?fi~ :~'S Sg'`jg ..g:~Y I _[ §si g~W-g ~.~ a Bg., sE,s~ =g28i : c "~<° vat ES;a ^ii ~ ~ dd= k..ia ~=_ie s 5pe " ~ :2 03° -2"~ h-ILL s:, 7} ~ 8~= =3b~ ~s$3 3~,~i ~~ a I~x~ tsi3=x c~trfi ~ Pis ~I °I ~I ~~ ~ - ~I ~I ~I ~I WTI 3 : ga- _'Sa 3,% .2_ a=~fi Ii 5~~ 8 Ig o9 ~~~' ~ ~ a~ 8~g dePg [ is= gYS. ~ vag~ ~~ ~: s" r. aaYK -_=g ~ d 5.9 :~ - sue?=i g '".it Yg -g` 3E _g= X -- _°. 3i ~ Ede 3g~~ _; a^'3a &s: ~~~~ ~~ iz~ ~-a~ ~~~ i ~~ ~~ ~ ~ r~ ~~ ^~ OI~~ ~~ ~~ ' ~/ s 7 ; ais i;!a~4 ee$ ~~ ~ a ~ V ~~ "$ .x s g ~ x ~~=" a° v "~~ ="klP~ _3s se p ~ E ~;~a ~Y a `~. ^; 6z~` chi i~ Sx ~ $ ~E$;E az s":3' a~y~y$ $?W~ ~s x : z c ~ ? de d ~x_ ~B - -fie e$~a s~ 9~ =i 4= e~r$~ •~ ~ai~ ~!'aa: =tee= 3'a ~- i- s ~ ,; a- @ e B;si j~ __~ 3i a» ~a:x~i r3 _ _ _I ,I .,I ,I ,I .I ~I 33 1 4 i 5 - ~F - , = a Y ~ S Zy:6~ 5 E ~ - Z a ~ ~ ~ =h 8- Y Ei Eg' e =~&g ~ 'a a~ ° xis _. 4 a~ Y~ ~ ~-~i ': F 8 VYyyS ~~ _ 3u =~.s ~' d ES 'i ~ ~~'N! 2a- Z:fi Y; _$ ~ •~ ~_ ~~s9~ E~ ~ a~ ~ 2 9`~Y ~ a7 Yi E~~82 66 Y~ ~g g~g_ Qx S X SS E•.S eY~ . o~t"` is 'S =' S X_ E_e ~E si 5-"hi QTY €;• ° ' ei~ -9 E 3~ SEE=i yyat ..i3 a _ ~ ~' ~ l ^I •I M ~I ~{S ~ See: a: c7 7 7 a`777 S 3 1 „ 6 B-» 8 ~ ~ggt ;~ '=s x a€ ash'. 9 e ss 7: 83~ r ~ ~ c E =, ea ~ a ~= .' ~S Fg ~i 858 ~ ~~ ~ g~ "S - a3 7 " s o 7 8'~ 3 ~_ w ~ a3o es i3a ~} ~iSBS '3a ~ %y ' ~;: 7~ i ~, a~ a P g$~ ~ f7F f~ M} ~"e ~' '~ i' i~ 8Y 2 ~ g8 ~ ~ SoZ3: iL ~i § 2if '.L ~ ~- .8 ~~:~.~ 3~ y 3i iS .° u =i \ 1 a wI ,I ]I ~ ~I,I '~I x° _ .8 ~, ;a g 9a $ .3 x: 7 7~ =a =II .7 ~~ ~? 3~ =a ~_ to #! =1~ ~ .=i~ 3i ~= Y :, 'y ° ~t Ea a= FY SS ;~ s~ Fs, g7 gist ?: ~~• ~p ;'= a-.~ L =I 87 "s g? a;~ ~i 5 ~ n °_~ Yx :"a ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ a ~ ~, ~ ! 1 ~ 3 ~ ~ ySy :yY sa x ;7~ s s~ E :?# -- ~Y o Egb 'Y 8Y ~ 4 _5 sF ~~ 3 ~Y~ ~ ~~ 7t E t ~= - aS sz ~8 i' ~ $s ae i~ 3 ^ ~a, 'o Y YSY: ~'bs _ g$ L 7~ii `Y~ !i: }~Y 2: NI ~ ~~I \ NI sa~MES `e7 i? ~ .SY ME ~~~ 57 i~ b ~~ 5 ^,L~ i F. ~- GCS 'xg °a~b- 9i~si'S g,.=.~ _~ ~83v !~~ ~~p~ la ~s~' ~iE ~S7~a ~~ ~ g7z t 7 "~Y~ c3~ t:r~a :9 :~'!~ • y `v='e ~. M z w V W .' O L G n P~;T ~a k~S.. L~~~ z. X48° .gay ~~~~ xo~p Eb"E _:zs `Vq Eg°~ n a .gS; _a~x~ ~E~~ii ~~~ :+- B X35 "` + 8 ~~Y LE~' _ '~'. i=_€ o ~~.F g E_'3 ~~'ln *~ ~ ~7 ~~ x~Y~ ~` _o~; a; =: <3a< <5 ~.I ~:I A9~ 7 8 S ~4W o 3 3 fi ~ -' ~~ - Y H `~f5 ~ e , K =' I e ~i ~= b.~ ~ R ~53~~!' ~~ Y X~ ~~e g,ag~ ~_ ~ 3c ~I `I ~ I' 3 I ~ I e (f(o U a~ °s ~} k~ ~~~ $ ~ e~ of E= e ~ ~ ~- aF _ ~a xz _ ~E ~ ~~ ~ • f S 2u' i _ ". '; ;~ ! EpF ~ _ eve .s~ -' 's 'a?~$ =y5 4~ =~ 35,Ej 6` YE ~: aJ€~ f eE a^ p~ 9~„ ~~t Q,~ i_ h6 ~ ~ -~_ __ °Y; ' :s X ~I ie,. I Y:3 ~I 4Y E VI C SA SPECIAL RBGIILAT1O N3 5.41 WINDROWS .100 Intent tt to the Intent o[ this sectiaa to meet the objeetivea of Chapter ' 3 and to perpetuate a windbreak system in Etiwanda throtgh: - Protection of selected ezeting mature BWe Oum Humlyptus windrows in key areas of the eomtwmityr and through - gradual rep4ament and expansion of tlm system throgh planting of sew Spotted Cum Ruaalyptw wlttdrows elatg the estsblished grid patter0. .200 Existing Windrows , .201 Existing windrows located along or within public street rights-ot-way specified in Figure 5-13 shall be preserved. Individual trees or sections of such windrows which are diseased or damaged by fire shall be replaced with 15 gal. size Eucalyptus Maculetn (Spotted Gum Eucalyptus)to match existing pattern and spacing. .202 Existing windrows located along or within exiati~ or future public streets but not specified m Figure 5-13 shall be replaced with new street trees in accordance with street cross-sections, Pigure 5-20 through 5-40. .203 F.xistin¢ on-site winArows not located alon¢ public streets may either be preserved or shall be replaced with Eucalyptus Idaculata (Spotted Gum) in accordance with Sections .400 and .500 Delow. .204 All mature existing windrows to be preserved shall require the following considerations: (s) No grading cuts or crontinuous trenching within 15'. (h) No fills within T. (c) No paving within 7'. (d) Structural setbacks of 25' minimum. (e) Adequate maintenance erd access provisions on one side o[ windrow. (h Provisions for deep wateri g; Iimit surface watering within IS'. Sys ~~~~~~~~ i _~- ._. -660KMV~. __--F_ i -~~. OOIww1 l.- _ _ ~I ./~ r `I ~~ r ~., i , L ,', devebped under OPTIONAL STANDARDS (concept onry) _ ~~ ~_ 660 K typ. _ _ Y. -- ~~f f, f -- --- developed under BASIC STANDARDS (concept only) NEW - C WINDROW PLANTING aUIDELINES U~~ FIG. 5- 42 Artic:e 5.41 -Windrows .300 New Windrow Plantings/Oft-Site C .301 New windrow plantings of Eucalyptus Meculata shall extend existing protected windrows along public streets specified in street crosssections, Figure 5-20 through '"' ~ .400 New Windrow Plantings/On-Site .401 New on-site windrow plantings of Eucalyptus Maculate shall De required in the ER,VL,L end LM Districts. Existing lots of record of I acre or tens may be exempted tram this requirement. .4112 The length of onsite windrows in linear feet required shall be determined by Figure 5-2 or 5-3 depending on whether Hesic or Optional Standards ere used. .403 The location of required onzite windrows shall Ue generally guided by the established 330'X880' grid pattern, as outlined in Figure 5-42. Required wittdrows may foLLow any portion of this grid, provided the total length of omsite windrows meets or exceeds the minimum length required. The use of the 330'X880' planting grid is not meant to discourage development of curvilinear local streets. ~r .500 Windrow Plan tng Criteria .501 The tree species used shall be Eucalyptus Maculate (Spotted Gum), in 5 gallon size. The trees should De field grown, spaced at 8 feet on center end, except along public streets and trails, need not Oe staked. .502 Adequate provisions for deep irrigation shall be provided at the time of planting. .600 Witxirow Maintenance .801 :Mature Windrows: (e) Leaves, debris, dead branches and suckers accumulated along the base of the windrow shaLL be removed periodically, or as may be necessary for reasons of public hearth end safety. (b) Dead ar decaying branches shall be removed, trunks stripped, end tree structure trimmed at least every Cour years or es may be necessary for reasons o[ puD6c health and safety as well es aesthetics. Trees should be !rimmed to preserve their natural structure; the practice of "tapping" the trees is not recommended. 5-3~8// ~ Y'o-~ x~ ~[ OIHra arov~ ~~ i~ ~ ~; ~ J ~1 r ~~ ~ ~` /~ cniu i ii~V J i ncc i ', ~,i-~~-'~-G (/ TREES TO BE PRESERV V ~. , ~'' _' ~ o~~ ~ ~+ Existing Windbreaks ~I ~ `~ y.km Existing Trees -~ Piypon, lllk O~kv /~/~ / Euerrlfpto - ~~ ~ 6rovo ;~~ __ ~ FOO'141 E~YC, r- _ ~~ ~ r-~; // _U~ _ ~~! Itie }19 ( ~ I', ^ STREET TREE S-1 9~' ~'' ,PRESERVATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Auyust 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner Alan Marren, Associate Planner Zp c~~MO'1G 7 j ~, t 6' ^ T .,~ Q ~IA F I, U ~2 ~ D 197] SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVAND SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY: The purpose of is eartng is consi er, review an approve a specific plan for the Foothill Boulevard area of Rancho Cucamonga. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development of properties along Foothill Boulevard between Grove and Haven Avenues, and between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council begin the revte- w an~puGiic hearing for the proposed Specific Plan for the Foothill Corridor. Due to the scope of issues addressed in the Plan, staff believes at least two meetings will be needed to fully discuss all issues. Therefore, following staff presentation and public comments, a continuance is recommended to the September 2, 1987 meeting. II. ABSTRACT: This report outlines thR process for the development of as u~alc Syecii i~ Fieu iur Cite Fuuliiiii i;u,i iJu,. iiu icJ aic i.i~c main components of the document and significant policy issues. The purpose of this report is to familiarize the City Council with the overall scope of the plan. Discussion of significant policy issues is outlined in the attachments. The City Council shoula consider input from the public and after deliberation, direct staff on any mesireo plan modifications. III. BACKGROUND: In mid-1986, the Cfty began an extensive study Lo eva-lual:e -the development potential of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. The ultimate goal was to provide a balanced and unified plan of development along Foothill Boulevard by taking advantage of opportunities in future community growth. The City also adopted interim policies to protect the integrity of the corridor and to allow the time necessary to formulate the Specific Plan. The process was initiated by the selection of a consultant, FORMA/Planning Network, and the establishment of a working group which included the consultants, planning staff, and a nine member Council-appointed Advisory Committee (see Exhibit "A") comprised of a ranye of people interested in the Planning process. IV. PROCESS OF PREPARATION: The study began in June, 1986 with a series o our net9 orhood meetings scheduled solely to receive CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEYARB SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY August 19, 1987 Paye 2 comments from residents, property owners and business people regarding the potentials and problems within the Corridor area. The information gathered resulted in a background report which set the basis for the initial consultant recommendations for the Specific Plan. to July, 1986, the Advisory Committee began a series of 10 working meetings to review the result of the background stuQy and consultant recommendations for the Oraft Plan. Again, the public was invfted to these meetings and opportunities were made available for additional public comment. During the ten month period, ending March 27, 1987, the Comwittee advised the staff and consultant on Plan proposals and their direction was reflected in the draft document reviewed by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission review began on April 8, 1987, and concluded public hearings an July 22, 1987 with a recoamendation for approval. During these deliberations, the Draft Plan was changed and modified to fine tune its provisions to agree with the latest public input as viewed by the Planning Commission. Overall, the Commission did not significantly change the Plan's general direction, policies, objectives, or basic design priorities. The environmental review process began in February with the development of an Environmental Impact Report (EIRi. The Planning Commission approval of the Specific Plan was based on its recommendation Co certify the Draft EIR and Addendum with the .., ..~.......,.. .,on v.~. t.,.o.n~ron r,a~rtoe e supplementr toy~the EIR deals with the review required for the General Plan Amendments which is still under review by the Dlanning Commission. It is anticipated that the combined Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment EIR will be ready for Planning Commission approval on August 26, 1987 and then be ready for City Council review and certification fn September. DRAFT PLAN OYERVIEN: The essence of the Plan is to facilitate the eve opmen o pro acts and public improvements which meet these criteria: o Provide high quality standards o Help unify the community's ir.:age o Reflect the communftfes heritage o Strengthen the economic viability of the corridor o Provide a balanced mix of land use or tenants o Deal effectively with traffic and safety problems U~~ CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY August 19, 1987 Page 3 The Plan's development standards have evolved from three significant policy recommx?ndations by Lhe Advisory Committee and Planning Commission. These key policy areas are listed below: 1. Community Design: The Committee expressed a strong rrsire-ate a distinct and high quality community identity for the Corridor. Towards this end, the following provisions are included: a. Special gateway elements at the entrances to the City. b. Recognition of key existing community features which are used in the Plan to establish architectural "character determinants" for special areas. c. Establishment of detailed design standards for key intersections within the Corridor. d. Providing suggested materials palette to encourage architectural designs compatible with a range of historical styles within the community. 2. Land Use and Economic Viability: The Plan places a strong emp asts an ncreas ng the commercial ui ahtltw n_i cnn_t_hat on~A ...,..e .....t ....t attraction. To romote this ~ .y V p goal, yaddi tional commercial and related activities have been planned by increasing commercially zoned land within the Corridor. A special use designation, Regionally- Related Commercial, has been included in the Etiwanda area to complement the regional mall and take advantage of the I-15 Freeway exposure. Special commercial districts have been included to provide special standards to encourage uses which will work well with unique areas such as the Thomas Bros. Winery and others. Traffic and Circulation: The Committee and Planning ommtsston recogn ze a need for development of an integrated traffic contrcl system. The Plan calls for median islands along the entire length of the Boulevard, identifies locations of median breaks and signals, and implements an access policy for mid- block locations. These provisions are to help "develop a circulation system which faci~itates sufficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic and enhances the community design character along Foothill Boulevard". y~ ~ CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY August 19, 1981 Page 4 Specific considerations were discussed in each of these areas during policy formulation are discussed in these areas (Exhibit "B"). VI. PLAN FORMAT: On April 4, 1907, the City Council received a copq oTtFe Draft Plan and reviewed the progress of the project. Nhile not commenting on any specific policy direction, one issue which the Council was interested in was the plan's format. It was suggested that the plan should be easy to read, clear as to what should be accomplished, and its format should "sell" the ideas contained to the reader. This suggestion was implemented by significantly revising the document for convenient use and the goals, ob,7ectives, standards and implementation methods are logically placed throughout the text. In addition, a suimary has been prepared to introduce the reader to the Plan. The result is a document which contains the following major parts: part I: Community Background; Part II: Devei opment Framework; Part III: Development Standards and Guidelines; Part iV: Development Regulations lBy Subarea); part V: Implementation. In an effort to better identify the varying aspects of the boulevard and address their unique needs, the plan divided the corridor into four geographic subareas as follows: Subarea 1: From Grove Avenue easterly to Cucamonga Channel Subarea 2: From Cucamonga Channel easterly to Hellman Avenue Subarea 3: From Hellman Avenue easterly to Haven Avenue Subarea 4: From the I-IS Freeway easterly to East Avenue Foothill Slubarea 2 e Subarea i] ~ Subarea 3 ~ ~ Q~/, v ~ A ~ ~h m y m m a c ~ o w E r ~ c <7 > s a = 3 ~~ W Subarea 4 a W CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY August 19, 1987 Page 5 YII. MW OR ISSUES: After months of study with the Advisory Committee, a nu er o significant issues remained for Planning Commission policy determtnation. These issues included the following: 1. The realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive to Grove Avenue versus realignment to a "T" Tntersection with Foothill Boulevard. 2. The extension of Estacia Street as a public or private road and designated access points into the Subarea 3 Mixed Use District. 3. The appropriate amount of commercially designated land acreage throughout the corridor. 4. Both the Advisory Committee and Planning Coawission expressed a strong desire to include some elements of the Plan in development along the stretch of Foothill Boulevard between Naven Avenue and the I-15 Freeway. This portion of the Boulevard is not maw subject to this Plan. This view led to a Planning Coawission recemmendatton that the City Council consider expanding the application of design standards (streetscape, architectural styles, and landscaping concepts) to the "missing link" of the corridor study. Yrr rnuri llf rnuc• Th" Foothill Rnulevard Specific P18n provides a concise se of answers to a wide range of issues facing the City along the Corridor. The soluttons to concerns of community design, appropriate land uses, and circulation are interwoven in the Plan which recognizes the specific value of each in providing for future development. The Plan recognizes the importance of this vital concourse and its uniQue features to strengthen and promote its community identity. Res idly tt , ra le % City tanner BB :AN ae y~~ FOOTHILL 80ULEVARO SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE May 1986 - March 1987 Suzanne Chittea, Planning Coataissioner Linda Eddy, Resident John Holt, Resident Tae Kohl, Building Industry Association Gary Mitchell, Land Dlanning Consultant Paul Saldana, Resident, Businessman Jeff Sceranka, Resident, Businessman Deborah Brotm,* Resident, Council Meatier Lynne Kraus,* Foothill Business Owner EIf11IBIT 'A' * Participated 1n 1986 C/ ~o COMMITf DESIGN: A. CDRRIDDIt OESI611 LQX:EPi The cost signtflcant physical feature of the Plan is the proposed design aw!thod to visually unify the protect area. This aspect of the protect was stated as a priawry goal in the Foothill Corridor Interim Policies which state in part, 'to establish a high quality, attractive, and unifying design iaw~ge reflective of coaasonity heritage'. The acceptance of the P1 an s concept will set the stage for general design of the Corridor and this feature should be adaptable to changes in other significant eleaw!nts of the Plan (i.e. Land Use, Circulation, etc.). Discussion: The Plan calls fora series of highly identifiable activity centers and gateway features which are linked by a unifying suburban parkray design as follows: 1. Activity Centers: Activity Centers are points of interest generally Located at ngjor intersections and/or landwrks along the Corridor. They are to provide individual identity by concentrating caaaw!rcial activity at the following o Foothill at Bear Gulch o Foothill at Vineyard Avenue o Foothill at Archibald Avenue o Foothill at Turner Avenue o Foothill at Etiwanda Avenue Foothill AI C A N 7 w M ~ N W EXHIBIT 'B' ~~ ~/ /~ ~~ Activity Cen[ers iateWays City Council Staff Report Exhibit '8" August 19, 1987 Page 2 These nodes will generally exhibit more fonaal urban design characteristics with the exception of Bear Gulch which is to remain in its present informal form. Specific criteria is developed for each node in the subarea Design Guidelines sections 8.2 through 8.5. 2. Suburban Parkway Transitions: This feature links the activity nodes with a Less formal streetscape design to include meandering/ undulating sidewalks with formal landscaping. The Planning Coamiission determined that this concept has great potential in attaining a unique and unifying design for Foothill Boulevard. The results are visualized as an interesting experience of entering the City through high visibility gateways and being led by stretches of informal parkways to high interest commercial centers which exhibit an urban pedestrian atmosphere. B.1 OYERAiL COIMMITY BESIGM CONCEPT (Section 7.5) Th{C GPrLia~ Mato{aC Crler.ifir. AP ti an alli dPlinPG HFli rh {mnlemrnt. the objectives of the activity center/suburban parkway concept. The components of this section contain the following: o Subarea Structure o Activity Center o Suburban Parkway o Overall Architectural Concept o Overall Landscape Architectural Concept 8.2 AACHITECTUTAL ISSUES One of the more recognizable aspects of a community design image is that of its architectural style. The Advisory Committee deliberated extensi vely on what architectural style should be encouraged as an aspect of community identity. The importance of this issue 15 exemplified by the plans Overall Statement: 'Goat: To create a dynamic concourse that 1s attractive and of high quality with a unifying design image, reflective of community heritage and identity...." y~~ City Council Staff Report Exhibit '8' August 19, 1987 Page 3 Oiswssien; Concern was voiced early on that the community does not have a single identifiable architectural theme, but exhibits a diversity of styles which were identified as winery, mission, California barn, 1930's Route 66, agricultural heritage, etc. The Coa^ittee resoived not to limit architecture to a single theme or style. Rather, it was decided that architecture should borrow certain elements from historical styles found in Rancho Cucamonga. Th15 view resulted in an architectural Concept (Rancho Cucamonga Heritage) which: 1. Encourages the use of elements from these types along the Corridor with provisions far design compatibility. 2. The use of a single style of architectural element is not a part of this plan. 3. Encouragement of design themes on a site-by-site basis is encouraged and provided for at activity centers and kGy features (Section 8.2 - 8.4 ). The Planning Commission concurred with this approach within the overall design framework so long as distinct architectural styles/themes are implemented at each activity center. In this manner, compatible architectural diversity can act as a unifying element in the suburban parkway streetscape while matntatning Ai ctlnrt arrhifar~ural <wlne ar fie.. ,,.~a.~~~..-~..-,---a-_- C. DESI6M 611IDELIIffS/SfA1DAADS These standards contain the implementation features for the objectives of the special design areas. The provisions are divided into two parts (III and IY). Part III addresses design standards which apply uniforwly throughout the corridor with emphasis on the suburban sections. Part IV, in combination with land use regulations, addresses design provisions unique to each subarea with emphasis on the respective activity nodes, These sections contain lot development regulations (setbacks, lot size, height limitations, etc.) which are adjusted to allow for the different opportunities of each subarea. fie implementation of the urban activity areas is provided through the 25 foot setback allowance in the activity nodes whereas, outside the node, the setbacks are 45 feet, ~/~3 City Council Staff Report Exhibit "B" August 19, 1987 page 4 LAID USE: A. OYEAALL UIID USE/ECONOIRC S1R11TE67 The Land Ilse goal is to 'develop a specific plan which is sensitive to community, land use, and physical needs". As a maior component of this statement, the Advisory Coimaittee set the tone for the land use/econaaric planning along Foothill through the following ob,~ectives: "Maximize the economic position of Foothill Corridor commercial activities, capturing neighborhood and subregional demand.' This abfective strongly influences the ultimate scope of commercial activity and character of the corridor and the following discussion focuses on potential result of such an aggressive commercial venture. Discussion: As part of the fact finding portion of the Pion study, an economic analysis was performed by the consulting team. The results of the economic consultants' study are as follows: V II.C Vi• n i,-'crcir- 1V.~i~ .L ~l ~i tun revenue Dy ~"sates potential leakage" in excess of f200 million annually to other cowwnities due to lack of significant high sales volume businesses. o Mithin the planning area, only a little rare than half of the commercial land is currently being used by retail, service, and office businesses. The dominant use for ail land use categories along the Corridor is vacant land (277 acres). o Based on prolected population at buildaut and 1,334 acres of General Plan commercially 6esfgnate6 land, the City has an un- realistically high allocation of commercial land for future needs when compared to "comparable titles". o Residential development along and ad,~acenc to the corridor would help to improve commercial viability along the boulevard. 4 ~ 7 City Council Staff Report Exhibit 'B' August 19, 1987 Page 5 The sales leakage is not the result of the lack of caaacercially zoned land; commercial growth normally lags behind residential development in all growing areas. As new commercial uses develop along with new shopping patterns, new cities begin to capture a greater proportion of the sales. However, overly ambitious commercial zoning can have a negative impact on the many vacant and currently underutilized parcels along the western portion of Foothill. The Advisory Committee and Planning Commission did not feel that additional commercial land would result in any negative impacts if other provisions and implementation programs of the Plan aggressively promoted commercial activity. As a result, the plan calls for significant additional coa~ercial acreage along the corridor, with the intent of capturing a portion of the regional traffic. Conversely, the number of acres available for residential growth would be reduced. The statistical land use breakdown is as follows: Present Oraft General Specific Plan Plan Difference _ .., .1 ,nee.,. :5". 3"5 .°." Residential 226 180 acres - 46 acres Industrial Park 84 45 acres - 39 acres Other 7 8 acres + 1 acre The key to a successful land use plan is balance and Foothill Boulevard does have a tremendous comaercial potential with regional camaerctal opportunities. fits is true particularly in the eastern portion oP the City, where large parcels of land are available for regional commercial use, with easy access and visibility from the I-15 Freeway, relationship to the regional mall, and a main gateway to the western portion of Fontana. B.1 UIID USE CATE60RIE5' In an effort to tailor the plan to unique opportunities and constrains of selected areas, special land use designations were developed. The following discussion describes and analyzes each case. ~7S City Council Staff Report Exhibit '8' August 19, 1987 Page 6 1. Regionally Related Ca~ercial (RC) This category is located immediately aWacent to the east side of the I-15 Freeway and was proposed to take advantage of the land's freeway exposure and close proximity Lo the future call. The extent of commercial activity allowed within this category was extensively discussed. The view which was implemented in the plan provides little or no restriction to competition with the call for space or 6uslness: 2. Specialty Commercial (SC) This designation was Incorporated into the Plan to facilitate the specialized development of landmark and activity centers of the Corridor. The location of this designation is at the intersections and entries to the City as follows: Grove Avenue to the gear Gulch Mea Vineyard Avenue Intersection (northeast corner) Archibald Intersection fie land use and development provisions of this zone provides for special standards to encourage the redevelopment and retention of existing features unique to the boulevard. Towards this goat, the allowed activities have been tailored to those business types which would tend support to the establishment of theme oriented activity centers. A sample of authorized uses include: Antique shops, bed and breakfast, book, gift and stationery stores, cafes, ,jewelry, luggage shops, art galleries, and travel agencies. Activities which may not lend themselves to this special character development are not authorized and include: Supermarkets, nurseries, garden supplies, television and stereo sales, hardware stores, auto service, and laundries. In this matter, the restricted activities help to keep the development character within the intended specialixed design of the high interest area. 7 City Council Staff Report Exhibit "B' August 19, 1987 Page 7 3. Mixed Use/Retail (MU/R) The large block bordered by Nellman Avenue, San Bernardino Road, Klusman Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard presented a number of potential difficulties as follows: o Many wall substandard lots in fragaented ownership o Excessive depth of the block to San Bernardino Road o A desire to limit the nuaber of vehicle access points to Foothill Boulevard o Residents to the north requesting Baited access from Foothill developments onto San Bernardino Road o Variety of residential (mobile home parks) and transition commercial uses within the block. in addressing these issues, the Plan provides a land use category vhich: a. tllnwt for aa~lf iota family davalnnnanfe from 8 to 14 dwelling units per acre; and b. Coupled with an establishment of convenience uses and services tailored to the residential needs; and c. Keyed to a mixed use concept is the requirement of a master plan for the entire MII/R area which would accomaodate remedies to circulation concerns. fie mixed use designation presents both potential to innovative solutions but can also result in incompatibilities if not adequately planned. The Planning Commission, Advisory Camm9ttee an8 staff ail concurred that master planning of Lhe entire area so designated is a must 1f the varying uses are to work well together. This provision was incorporated iota the Plan. 7 7 City Council Staff Report ExhlDit 'B' August 19, 1987 Page 8 c. oEVE~oPIm RESUUnaiis Part IV lapie~ents the direction of land use classifications by t:he foraulation of approved and conditionally perwitted activities. The allowance of per~itted use through the corridor does not follow a typical 'Euclidean' type zoning 1n that less Intense activities allowed in the Specialty Coawercial district are not necessary carried through to the Caaawnlty Caa~ercial. These uses were selected to encourage specific types of business developaent in the Specialty Coa~erctal areas. y~ ~ City Council staff Report Exhibit 'B" August 19, 1987 Page 9 CIRCUUITIOM: A. OYE1Wl TRIIF'FIC STSTEII A maior concern to which the Plan must provide solutions is that of future traffic congestion. The traffic analysis as part of the background report predicted average daily traffic counts of up to 86,000 without the Route 30 Freeway. Nith the new freeway, assumed in all our plans, the volumes of traffic on Foothill would decrease to 50,000 - 60,000 ADT's but protected ievels of service will still remain unsatisfactory. The proposed traffic control system 1s as follows: The overall traffic system utilizes synchronized traffic signaiization and the following: 1. Continuous median islands with cuts limited to ma,~or intersections, and specified locations only. 2. Selected access points on Foothill Boulevard based on existing City policy for driveway locations. 3. Multiple left-turn lanes and separate rlght- tllrn lance of rniN~sl i..crcccti GC+. Even with these measures, the traffic consultant predicts poor levels of service at ma,ior intersections. NhT1e this problem has been expected without a specific plan study, tt is also recognized that the increase in the amount of commercial land will add incrementally to the overall traffic volumes. The Planning Commission and Advisory Committee determined the importance of edeQuate controi measures and timely implementation can not be overemphasized. tt should be recognized that the corridor 1s an Integral part of the City-wide and regional circulation system and that all traffic control measures must work 1n concert with one another. The desire to provide additional median openings or points of access to localized areas must be weighed against the Boulevard's ability to carry the prodicted volumes of traffic as a crucial component of an overall system, ~~9 City Countll Staff Report Exhibit "B' August 19, 1987 page 10 6. SELECTm CIRCIA.ATIOR ISSIffS Red Iflll Court Club Realf9muent: fie reallgmaent of lre3lflll-Coup iy u r ve was s udled in relation to: 1. Its awkward intersection with Foothill Boulevard and inadequate distance to Grove Avenue causing safefy and circulation problems at bath Intersections. 2. Its inappropriate use as a shortcut to Base Line Road, thereby increasing traffic through the residential neighborhood on Red Hill. The Advisory Committee considered two realignment alternatives as follows: 1. Alternative 1 calls for realignment southerly to a 90 degree "T' intersection, easterly of the present location. 2. Alternative 2, which was the final choice, the road should be reaiigned westerly to Grove Avenue and aligned with the shopping center driveway on the west side of Grove. ExteMlo~ of Fstacta Avenue: Residents on the north Nne or San Bernardino oa etween Neliman and Klusman Avenues expressed concern over potential excessive traffic generated by future development on the south side of San Bernardino Road. This concern resulted in a request to prohibit any access points from this area onto San Bernardino RoaG. The Advisory Committee generally agreed with their concerns and recomakndatton against any significant caammrcial access northerly to this street. The Planning CoamissTon concurred with this solution. In order to provide sufficient access into this large block, the following measures were included 1n the Plan: 1. Extension of Estacia Avenue (either as a public street or private drive; westerly Into the area. 2. fie location of two me~or access points opposite Malachite and Reims northerly into the block. The Malachite access extension would be an appropriate location for a signalized Intersection. C/ ~U City Council Staff Report Exhibit 'B' August 19, 1987 Page li 3. An interior circulation system of public or private drives linking the extension of Estacia with the access points off FoothTil Boulevard. Sae Bernardino Road Realigea~t: The Plan calls for the a us n o n rnar no oad intersection opposite the Sycaeore Inn by closing off the easterly extension of the 'Y" intersection. C. ROIOYAY C81BT161BGTIBBS: The appendix contains the proposed roadway configuration for naior intersection design. The exact design dieensions and configuration will be based on the traffic control needs of each aaUOr intersection. gl PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS AND MINUTES Exhibit "C" y ~ ~- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisston FROM: Brad Buller, Ctty Planner BY: Alan Narren, Associate Planner ~ ccu^+o,~ ~ I~ 41 CI ~fP F'j ~ iZ .., i- I9T 5U8JEC7: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A public hearing to cons er approve o e ra oothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The draft Specific Plan provides for detailed land use categories and development standards for all future development on properties aQlacent to Foothill Boulevard. iCOntinued from July 8, 1987) BACKGROUND: At the July 8, 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission o ere na1 direction on the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Prior to its final deterwlnation however, the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce requested an opportunity to review the final draft prior to Planning Commission action. Planning staff met with the Economic Development Coawlttee of the Lhamber on July 15, 1987, at which a summary of the planned Drovisionc wAC n.ege^.tcC -a~'~ts ~~~eivea rrom the Chamber were generally very positive, and staff does not anticipate any additional significant feedback. A representative from the Chamber may provide input at the upcoming meeting. In addition, in a final review of the document, staff has noted a few last items need to De ad,?usted. These are noted in the following sections: Maps The extension of the regionally related commercial uses along the east side of the I-15 Freeway was mistakenly left off the land use map. Exhibit "A" indicates how the final land use map will depict this area as it was shown on all previous drafts. The maps wail also incorporate the new freeway on and off ramps on the east side of I-15. Tree Plantings: The plan allows for a variation of building setbacks in the activity nodes from a minimum of 25 feet to 45 feet. The daubie row of Sycamore street trees was designed for the 45 foot setback fTEM C PLANNING COlMISSION _~~IIFF REPORT RE: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN July 22, 1987 Page 2 concept. In some areas however, such as the Archibald intersection, the City will wish to entourage a 25 foot setback. Staff analysts of this alternative reveals difficulty in using a double row of Sycamores Tn such a narrow setback. In addition, CalTrans prohibits large trees within State highway public rights- of-way. Therefore, a modified streetscape planting of Crape Myrtles is recommended for the activity centers (see Exhibit "B"). This tree species should be small enough for Cal Trans acceptance and would satisfy the City's desires fora picturesque street tree to provide a formal accent line within the activity centers. Further, this species 1s well adapted for this climate and will, as a side benefit, provide accent color along the sidewalks and as an alternative median island accent tree. The streetscape within the Bear Gulch area should retain the use of Sycamore trees 1n a single row concept, which would tie into a natural planting scheme of Sycamores on private property. Minimum Lot Dimensions: The plan does not list minimum lot standards (depth and width for properties in the Community Commercial District, instead referring to General Commercial standards in the City's Development Code. Since there 1s no Community Commercial District designation within the Code, staff believes confusion might result as to which standard should apply. Therefore, staff recommennc rn~t .a '.rcrpcrata a Zuu root minimum lot width and 175 foot lot depth (which stays consistent with the General Commercial designation) for the Community Commerical tot Standards. Eucalyptus Grove at Foothill 6 East Avenue: The Etiwanda Specific Plan coils for partial preservation of the Eucalyptus grove at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard as follows: Foothill/East Avenue Location: This site has been selected for Neighborhood Commercial use with specific intent to allow for partial preservation of the existing Eucalyptus grove. The site plan for such use shall incorporate as many existing trees as possible, but no less than 60E of the area of grove nor less than 258 of the trees. Provisions shad also be made fora 20' wide Greenway through the interior boundary near the northwest corner of the site f~,• future connection to the Community Tra11 system and Miller Park. y~y PLANNING COMMISSION _iAFF REPORT RE: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN duly 22, 1987 Page 3 With the removal of this site provision will be lost. Staff incorporated into the Foothill Plan. Executive Summary: from the Etiwanda Plan, this suggests that this text is Staff is continuing to work with the consultant to improve the graphics and their relationship to the text. Additional items anticipated to be added include: A small strip map sharing the protect boundaries and subarea locations. b. A perspective view of a typical activity node which will show the formal urban design characteristics. II. CONCLUSIONS: All Planning Commission direction for modification of the Draft Plan have been completed and the Plan should now be ready for City Council review. fie Planning Commission should note, however, that the General Plan Amendments required prior to final enactment of the Specific Plan, will not be ready for Dlanntng Commission action until the second meeting in August. Therefore, the attached draft Resolution of Approval has a condition redui ri na adoption of cho Gxa~al :ion rwenamenc oerore the approval is effective. This procedure will allow the City Council to begin these public hearings while the Planning Commission action on the General Plan Amendments "catches up" with the specific plan City Council action. fII. RECOMMENDATION: It is recavmrended that the Planning Cama1551on recamae"" n~to the City Council the approval of the Foothill Ooulevard Specific Plan by the adoption of the attached Resolution. Resp ally s 1tt ra r City Pia ner BB:AM:ko Attachments: Letter From Paul Max, Rancho Foothill Partners Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Resolution with EzhlDlts y~~ fice C July 10, 1987 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission c/o Planning Department 9340 Baseline Road Suite B en,oRECFyvr ~ ~0~/H'~IC eirs~ooo cq M ~~~ ,'~ ~~ ?i8,yy~f~Y~,1,t , • IJl jrslsf Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Comm i.ssioner Larry McNeil, Chairman Commissioner Suzanne Chitiea, Yice Chairman Commissioner Bruce Emerick Commissioner David Blakesley Commissioner Peter Tolstoy Re: Rancho Foothill Office Center 10155 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Commissioners: AaerF.. C..~~6:11 0~..., .,..- ..ia i~i._ _. _ ......, c.: ____ . uee. a.a::..,d for allowing us to speak on our behalf with regard to our request to have the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga implement a minor addendum Co the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Our request, as stated at the public hearing, would be to realign the proposed CC zone on [he south aide of Foothill Boulevard, from Turner Avenue in an easterly direction to encompasa the existing Michael J's restaurant and our adjacent vacant property, consisting of approximately 1.6 acres. As the Commission is aware, Rancho Foothill Partners has already gone through all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's processes for the development of a 37,000 square foot, two-story office building, for our subject site. Our request was not presented wire .he ,nten[ to a6ando r, the project but imply to expand our options Co allow us to create a development which may not only be mare economically feasible for us, Dut would also benefit [he Cicy of Rancho Cucamonga with a greater tax base Chan the use presently planned. We also feel that since our property is basically an "in-fill" type of project, our request is reasonable and should have no great impact on [he overall Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. O/ Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission July 10, 1987 Page 'fwe We will be petitioning [he Planning Department staff between now and July 22, 1987 (Che next scheduled hearing date) to implement our request. We would appreciate eny input the Commission may have regarding this aatter. We would like Co extend our thanks for the courtesies shown to us in [he pa sC and we look forward Co your assistance in the near fuCnre. /Sincerel Rancho Foot 1 ar[ners i i ( / [~~~ /`/( ~Pa uuT Max / ` Partner PM/dls cc: Brad Buller Alan Walters Sheldon Latc y b~ o Y..q Y.Y.J. .. t + "~ 0.~. ~...~ ~~~ ~~ ~ g ~ ~4 ,~:. ~ ~~ ~~ 3~ u `>' o ~ A q '7 ~ ~~ ~ 1 hh 0 v ~. L/ Q ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CITCAMONGA ~ MEMORANDUM ~'~ ',. e > I~ fi a hZ - > 1977 DATE: July 22, 198T T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Alan Darren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN TEST Pursuant to Planning Camission direction the changes noted on the attachment will be incorporated Into the aDDroved plan document (Land Use Matrix and Permitted and Conditional Uses lists) prior to forwarding to the City Council. These modifications were lnadvertantly omitted from those listed in July 22, 1987 report. AD:vc Attachments: Amended Land Use Matrix ~~ PFRIITTED alO ~iTiOei 16F5: T-v~T SIEYN RN SUrN TA $I~rN Blrfl 416rN Faf Betel rgeercial ors - sc a B nR P sc a B nR ~ a In LIN m u NU a aBC m u m anti We Stops I % X A Bppr el ; e ~ ~~ytt1~ ----- -- -- ---- ----- --- Apphnce Stores aeN hpair z N x X N art, Itaec, and Photographic StWias and Supply Stores X N X x N x% X T N athletic and IW1N B/+s and Neight Baducing Clinics N O x 0 x 0 0 N %. auto Service 6trtim 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 auto Service IInclWinq eotvcycla, boats, trailrs, ca~~1: al SaIN leith an~illry rapairl 0 0 0 0 bl Rentals .0~__ .IL.. _~-______ _0__~ ~r~rear~rwr.'Fade tea--- ~ include Nior engine xmk, welflr sAOps, p~~hnngg, body iak` stryc eft.) ~ ar~e~ba"~iaerng -'-- --°--- --°-- - -0v------- Il__I eN Mtawtic x.eillg B 0 R Prts aM Supplin X X % 1 f &krio (retail mlyl I X N 1 x A% 1 1 % Brbr and BNUty Shrga A X % 1 1 N % % X I % Xa Bed i IkNNaat O O O 0 0 O O Bicycle Shops N X N A N I N Xa Blueprint aM PMtaapY SrvicN % % X M N % X 1 % Book, 6i Xt, aM 6tatimry Strn lothr than adult related Ntriall % X % x % % % A X 1 x % Candy and Cm/ectianriN X N N N X x N N N Xa uev mq isaaouv~t3 X x N 1 X X Lhina and 61NSere 3tmn 1 N % A % % % Ia Chri stns Tree SaIN Lots lapratinq m a teWry bnisl % % X x Chwches 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Claanen9 antl Prnsang EstWlislrits 1 1 N x A N N N N % Ca:ktail Lange Ibr~ laepe, tavern) inclWinq related ntrtaineant O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Caeaaercial Bevxtim: al Indoor uses such n baling and bi11rM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bl Outdoor ws nth N <emis and hasketball 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cvroaiesceni ianhtees and lbspiGls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cwtaen and Orapry 9io0s N N N X% N 1 B,r cre Gntrs BBB B B a B o a B Os1lcNnsans and Spsu ally Food 5trres I N X N 1 % N N 1 %a Oruq Stares aM PhrNCe es X N % N X % FY KrS Markets 1 1 X % N Flom Covering shops N N N N N Flares! apt I A N /! J, / 1 I% X 1 X ~~u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 1987 T0: Chairman and Nembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN ccc^MO,~ ~~ v ~ '= U vp c ~- jZ .. > 19" I. BACKGROUND: At the June 24, 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission rev~d-recowaendations to modify the draft Specific Plan and gave staff final direction on the plan provisions. Since that time, an amended plan has been produced and distributed to the Commission. This plan should be in a form ready for final Planning Commission consideration. As was mentioned at the last meeting, one of the significant changes to the plan is the addition of an executive summary at the beginning of the document. This feature provides a Drief but detailed general description of the plan's scope, its goals and objectives, and structure. The summary will give the reader a picture of the coawunity's desires in the development of the wrriuur and iie ip the pubiic underscand me plan's ooJeC Live s. The summary will also be available separately to help educate the canmmu ni ty about the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. On June 29, 1987, at a meeting with Chamber of Commerce representatives, the Chamber requested an opportunity to review the final draft prior to final Commission action on the document. Staff was requested to present a summary of the plan at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Economic Development Committee of the Chamber of Commerce on July 15, 1987. Since the revised draft has only been available for public review for a few days, it may be appropriate Lo extend the review period till July 22, 1987. As a result, staff is not prepared to recommend approval until aftar final Chamber comments are presented for consideration. Lewis Homes has forwarded concerns reyardtng the Planning Commission recommendation to incorporate design elements of the plan into properties along Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and the I-15 Freeway. The Commission recommendation to include this area has not yet been formally presented to the City Council for consideration. Staff intends to bring the issue to the Council along with the Planning Commission specific plan approval recommendation. ITEFI p PLANK IN6 COMMISSION. ,TAPE REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN July 0, 1987 Page 2 III. RECOlMENDATION: It is recoawended that the Planning Coe~aission prav e s with any final coaaents regarding the plan and continue the itee to the July 22, 1987 meeting for consideration of ~1 dents by the public or the Chaeber of Coanerce. suMai tted, -Brad Bu ler City Panne BB Nate Attachaent: Final Draft Specific Plan yq~ F007HILL BBULEYARD SPECIFIC PUN SUNARV The City of Rancho Cucaonga is a community co~ltted to excellence. The City's development and design router process places heavy eaghasis on quality, tang tern Wabillty, and support of community goals in all development projects. iRUr Is Txls puw ABBBTI Foothill Boulevard is the most significant commercial corridor in the City. Established as a ma,~or east/west commercial thoroughfare, the corridor 1s an important part of the developing regional business area for the Nest Valley. The Boulevard's part in this potential cammerci al growth will be all the Wore significant Wth the development of the regional mall at Foothill Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway. The purpose of this Plan is to provide a Dalanced and unified pattern of development along Foothill Boulevard by taking advantage of opportunities 1n future community growth. The essence of the Pian is to facilitate the development of protects and public improvements whtch meet these criteria: o Provide high quality standards o Help unify the community's image o Reflect the conmmnity's heritage o Strengthen the economic viability of the corridor o Provide a balanced mix of land uses or tenants o deal effectively with traffic and safety problems NIIY A SPECIFIC PLANT fie Specific Plan 1s a tool that combines tradittonai zoning with detailed design and development standards tallnred to specific conditions. It is a comprehensive document which contains all policies and development standards necessary for the design of any pro,~ect within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. The Specific Dl an examines the needs of Oho camiercial and residential area and implements the policies of the General Plan. C/93 2 Because conditions along the corridor vary significantly, the Plan and Its Development Standards are divided into four subareas. Each of these planning areas have unique problems and opportunities: Subarea 1 (Bear Gulch) Grove to Cucamonga Creek Subarea 2 (YTneyard) Cucamonga Creek to Hellman Avenue Subarea 3 (Old Cucamonga) Hellman to Deer Creek Subarea 4 (Etiwanda) I-15 to East Avenue Development Standards unique to each subarea are used to provide the necessary guidelines for development. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan include four ma,or elements: o Community Design o Land Use o Circulation o Inglementatton CDIMMITY DESIGN The Plan aims to visually unify the entire corridor. To do so, the Plan calls fora series of highly identifiable activity ronhn..e awA .~........ wii-.. ^,...-..~~- ~.~ ors liu~eu uy a unifying suourban parkway design as follows: Activity Centers: Activity Centers are points of Interest located at maJor intersections and/or landmarks along the Corridor. They are to provide individual identity by concentrating commercial activity at the following areas: o Foothill at Bear Gulch o Foothill at Vineyard Avenue o Foothill at Archibald Avenue o Foothill at Turner Avenue o Foothill at Etlwanda AVeuua ~/ ~T These activity centers are generally more urban in nature, with buildings closer to the street and a greater emphasis on building design. Suburban Parkway Transitions: These areas link the activity centers with a less formal streetscape design to include meandering/undulating sidewalks and informal Landscaping. Buildings in these areas have deeper setbacks and are often separated from the street by landscaped parking areas. Architecture: One of the more recognizable aspects of a community design image is its architectural Style. This plan recognizes the importance of the community's heritage and identifies significant historica] structures and architectural elements along the boulevard. The Plan does not limit architecture to a single theme or style. Rather, it calls for architecture to borrow certain elements from historical styles found in Rancho Cucamonga. This architectural concept is strongly encouraged throughout the corridor, and particularly in the activity centers, where existing historical structures serve as "architectural determinants". LND USE In an effort Lo establish the Corridor as a viable regional commercial area the plan provides for significant commercial opportunities along Gig Luuiereru. Toe land use aesignan ons and activities have been carefully selected to enhance the community design concept and improve its commercial Viability. The Plan is tailored to unique opportunities and constraints of selected areas, and contains special land use provisions highlighted below: Regionally Related Commercial (RC) This category is located immediately ayacent to the east side of the I-15 Freeway to take advantage of the land's freeway exposure and dose proximity to the regional mall. The intent is to provide a viable environment for retailers of regional nature that will not locate within the mall itself. Special ty Commercial (SC) This designation was incorporated into the P1 an to facilitate the sDectalized development of landmark and activity centers along the corridor. The intent here is to provide high quail y, pedestrian- ortented activity areas, with eating establishments, entertainment and specialty shopping. The location of this designation is at key areas, as follows: w ~5 4 o Bear Gulch o Yineyard Avenue Intersection (Thomas Bros. Minery) o Archibald Avenue Intersection In addition, the plan cal is for more traditional commercial, office and residential developments, with focus on quality, balance, and community identity. rtcr_u annr A maior concern to which the Plan must provide solutions is that of future traffic congestion. The traffic analysis predicts an ultimate daily traffic count of 50,000-60,000 cars. This means that the importance of adequate traffic control measures cannot be over- emphasized. This Plan calls for the construction of Foothill Boulevard as a six lane divided arterial, with: o Synchronized stgnallzation at all intersections. o A continuous median island, with openings limited to ma~ar intersections and selected adittonal loaations. o Selected access location points on Foothill Boulevard based on a restrictive polity for driveway locations and minimum spacing. u riuiiipie ieit-turn lanes and separate right-turn lanes at critical intersections. The Plan also provides criteria under which additional median openings or access points may be considered. However, it must be recognized that the corridor is an integral part of the Ctty-wide and regional circulation system and that all traffic control measures must work in concert with one another. The desire to provide additional median openings or points of access to localized areas must be weighed against the Boulevard's ability to carry safely the projected volumes of traffic. IIN.Dff.IfTATIOM To ensure roar the plan area develops successfully, the implementation section provides suggested methods of financing for needed public Improvements. Cost estimates and proposed phasing of improvements are provided. TM s section includes a 104 consolidation program which provides incentives for small lot owners to work together with the Redevelopment Agency to improve development potenttal zt certain target areas. Y ~b The plan also recognizes the need to bring high sales voluse businesses into the City, and this section suggests certain incentives to attract these strong sarket perfarners. In addition, it is recognized that the existing businesses along the corridor need to 6e helped in the corridor's revitalization with a sown business assistance prograa with the Redevelopsent Agency, Aoall Business, Adsinistration, and other progress. Y~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: June 24, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner Alan Marren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN GLGM NC ~~ ~ ~~ Y: ~ ~ Z - l> 19:] ~ I. BACKGROUND: Review of the Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan ss c~onEfnued from the May 27, 1987 meeting. At that time, the Planning Commission gave finai direction to staff and the consultant to amend the Plan for preparation of a document in an adoption-ready fonmat. Since that time, staff and the consultant have Deen working towards this end, but unfortunately the scope of the changes and the desire to bring a high quality product to the Commission ha extended the time needed to accomplish the work. Therefore, the final draft will not be ready for consideration until July 8, but staff would like to take this opportunity to inform the Commaission of same of the significant changes which are being inrnrnnrafeA into the of an II. DISCUSSION: o Due to the desire to have a "reader friendly" document, the foil owing changes have been made: 1. An executive summary was added at the very beginning of the document to "hit" the significant points of the plan and to Interest the reader in the project. 2. The required legal and procedural references have been nerved from the beginning of Part 1 to a revised Part 3, Development Standards and Guidelines. ~+~ A restructuring of the general and specific subarea regulations was made which resulted in a revised Part 3 and Part 4, Thts makes the plan far easier to work with, 4. The document was modified to an 8+f x 11 inch format with foldout maps. This was necessary to make the plan usable on a day to day basis, and to make it consistent with our other documents. I T"' K PLANNING COMMISSIOA oTAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BLVD. SPECIFIC PLAN June 24, 1987 Page 2 o The land use change from Mixed Use back to Medium Residential for the northwest corner of Etiwanda and Foothill was made and the property owners have been notified by mail of this modification. o Changes to the land use activities have been incorporated into each subarea as directed by the planning Cow~ission. In addition, staff has noted several potential deficiencies in the plan, and requested changes noted below. The Camaission 1s requested to confira our direction: A. Adjust the boundaries of subarea 2 westerly to the Cucamonga Channel, to place the intersection of Vineyard and Foothill under a single set of subarea standards. The original draft divided the Thomas Bros. Vinery activity center into two subareas creating same confusion and insonslstencles. a,~..,r M wr... f Y~ ~ -Y I -emu^~. ~^f~ % ~ ' __~ •l w I ~i~ y ~~ PLANNING COlMISS[01. aTAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BLVD. SPECIFIC PLAN June 24, 1987 Page 3 B. Fine Lune the following activity center boundaries: 1. Extend the west side of the Archibald activity center northerly along to align with the eastern side of Archibald as shown below. The existing uses and shallow lot depth reinforce this concept. ___~_ ....Dpi n ~ I ~ o t; ::~: 1~-- ~D ~ J L^/ u .~ ;~ ~~~, _~ .~N R' r, ~ G 2. The Ettwanda activity center should be designed to continue the visual continuity of the activity center concept along the corridor. The activity center should De modified to provide similar visual treatment on both sides of the street, as shown below: I i oua/_ i ` /) ~, ._. [-t Uu ::.:::W:1t~r~^~ ~C3PP~7P L oaiea'. ' I II ~ PLANNING CpMISSIOn STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BLVD. SPECIFIC PLAN June 24, 1987 Page 4 Staff will incorporate the modifications listed in Items A and B unless the Commission directs differently. Finally, two other items which staff Delteves should 6e considered for addition to the plan are as follows: C. At the northwest corner of Foothill and Ramona, a new shopping center has recently been completed. The draft plan proposes that this site be within the Commercial Office (CO) land use designation. Me recommend that the plan recognize the function of the recently completed commercial center to allow for the site to be designated Community Commercial (CC ). Staff would like the Planning Commission to confirm direction on this matter, C/ V ~ (r'~1 ~~L+~1 CJ ~,rc ~' i ~ ~~y A~ ~. _ -~--(1 ~.: 3 3, ~ ~`~ x".17_1+/~_ ~ `~ "~ 71 CiCr 1 'l • _~ .:~ . 11 J^ _~ ~i1 . ~ ice- ;I I~ I, J ~ Irl Wild] D. In response to concerns of the developers of the Thomas Bros. Winery site regarding the limits of special retail uses within the Specialty Commercial designation, staff has reviewed usa proposals by the developers. They have proposed that an expansion of specific uses be considered as ment oned in Lheir letter of June 5, 1987 (see Exhibit "A"). Staff is concerned about adding further special activities to the already substantial use list. As an alternative, we suggest a general provision, to read as follows: S~~ PLANNING COMMISSIO,. STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL 8L90. SPECIFIC PLAN June 24, 1987 Page 5 Specialty Retail - This use is typified as small s ops~ o~ufiques which specialize in limited product lines of unique and novel designs and/or purposes. Specialty Retail is defined as follows: a. My retail business not listed separately in Sections 9.3.2, 9.5.2, 9.7.2 and 9.9.2 which limits its saes to product lines of singular purpose or of unique and special design (i.e. cutlery shops, small household or personal appliances, kitchenware, novelty gifts, etc.). Service businesses are not specialty retail uses. b. Limited to a business area of 3,000 square feet totally within an enclosed building. Staff reconmiends that the Specialty Retail use be conditionally perwitted in the Specialty Camaeroial and Community Commercial districts. It Ts hoped that this proposed amendment will expand the use potential within the SC district while ensuring the character and reduced scale of the specialty businesses. Staff would like Planning Commission direction an this concept. Finally, the Engineering Division has requested expansion of the Median Island orovlsions as descrl6ed in the Circulation Concept, Section 7.1.1. Refer to Exhibit "B" for the tezL addition. In addition to the street improvement provisions of the Circulation section, intersection configurations and right-of-way design dimensions (Exhibits "C" and "D") are recommended for incorporation into an appendix. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting a confirmation on Items A rou is also recommended that the Planning Coamission continue the Specific plan to July 8, 1987, for consideration of the plan adoption. Respe full su itt U/ . /i~~-/.-.~~ Brdd Buller City Planner 88:ON/AW:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Larry Lazar Exhibit "B" - Median Island Text Exhibit "C" - Intersection Configurations Exhibit "D" - Right-of-Way Dimensions ~~ ~l heZ alic0 -~-- b.~,~. ~~~a ,~ ..~~~ 1Cft@S ; RECEIYEO tm ~ _ Punni June 5, 1987 JUN pp ~gg~ 7i8j8jp~ll~~i1j2~3i4 5 6 i Mr. Otto Kroutil Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucaoonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cuceoonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Kroutil: In reapowe to the direction given by the Planning Coa~isalon Sn the nest- ing on Nay 18, 1987, we ars aubnitting theca revised dsfinitlow of these potential was rithin the Specialty Conrrcial zoning deaigwtion. I. Uaea/Dafinitiow apprwad by the Planning Co~lsalon on Nay 18, 1987: 1. Ch11d care wrvlcn Por ahoppera ' 2. Clock stores including repair u a snrvlce 3. Yardage atorea 4. Art Ga11ar1ae 5. Tailoring, when including witb other retailing clothing tarvicea II. Otea requiring • nod£fied deflnltLon: 1, Original Daf1~1t`; Cetering Batnbliahwnta Redefinition; Ancillary Cat-r+n~ co.z..,,, _ en eatabliahnent asrving both hot aM cold food itese for on-praniaes cawumption or cake cut. Catering would 4e en awiliery function. 2. Orieiwl Defi iti SpaciQty Hardware RedafinLtion; Novel Nouaaw r - • retail store that Belle scull eppliancea, cookware, kitchen utensils and gadgets, or bathroom aupp lien and hardware. 3. griginel D finition; Indoor Plant Stores Rn^-^ef!r.!tLn: Interior Deai w Reraii - a atora that aella Indoor plenty and tupplLee, wallpaper end wall hangLnga. It auy have a cowultation service, ~-~; ~y~onc,, la1~N 'A''^ ~ ;~~ ;,q~~-i7CH xr. octo Kroeii June 5, 1987 Page Two 4. Oriafnal Definition: Specialty office, buaineen end coaputer retailers. Redefinition: Office 9ystesa Salsa - an eatebliahaent that nails office equlpnent and supplies, coaputer herduere and eoftsere. 5. Or ginal Definition: Specialty Stores retniling radios, stereos, CDs, TVs, ooaryuterD and Othei elecCZOnlc ICeas. Redefinition: Novelty Rlectronica - a retell atone with focused aalen of original a~ innovative electronic iteu. We ere open to dLacusa square footage lfaitationa for particular usen and Conditional Uae Per~1t requirernts for parnittad uses. If you have anq questions regarding Chess revised definitions of potential ones, please glue ar a call at (714) 640-1700, We would like to aw+et with your staff during the week of Juiu 8 to June 12 to finallte these deflnl- tione. IRC, t.L: J lh ~~ Median Island Addition A raised landscaped median has been a part of the Foothill Boulevard Master Plan since adoption of the General P1 an in 1981. The median system is designed to maintain the highest level of service possible on a street whose very capacity is going to be severely taxed. The enhanceaN•nt of traffic flow and safety through the attainment of the lowest possible level of confllcL aaong vehicles is essential to achteving the necessary service level. In order to preserve the level of service on Foothill Boulevard, access to commercial properties should be via the median breaks at signalized intersections, with off-street, internal circulation to De provided to serve the properties between intersections. It will also be necessary to accept an increased number of U-turns at the remaining intersections to reduce the greater friction caused by acre frequent median openings. My median break on a street with such high volume must De signalized for safety and when signals are placed less than approzlmately 700 feet apart, the speed at which progressive traffic movaeent can be obtained fails Delaw an acceptable level. East-west arterials in the City will have to be capable of two-way progressive traffic service fora large part of the day. For these reasons, no median break has been planned, for example, at Red Rill Country Club Or1ve, San Diego Avenue, or Klusman Avenue. Klusman Avenue is only 520 feet from Malachite Avenue, an important future intersection, and is at a questionable distance of 670 feet from Archibald Avenue. The necessary left-turn lanes for median breaks eliminate median planting and when such breaks are close together, reducing the aesthetic value of the median and its visibility. This creates the possibility of traffic from driveways attempting to make left turns, not realtzing a median exists. Exhibit "B" ~~ W -P ~ -- RIeH1 aF WAY LINE CuK6 {,WE J F ~ h x~ N A --x- 8 ~ --)(-- D M ~. L O -Sf- N Ivo7G', ryCty~~tioue~ ri0~~•7urN I1utf 1u~Y 6G rt~joirtd a~ JJSewr olrivcu»y5 ~nr -FGis ixkrfecfwh. E WIDENINC3 REC~VIRED AT I NTeRSfGT1ON5 see Feccowiws 77me ~ f/rClf'~G eAff/5 ~~ R T ~~ Q $ F N _.. ... . _ F_Q7NJLL . ~- ~- -- BLVD G I 0.IGHT-OF-NAY AND CURB OFFSETS REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS neyar ve. rc a ve. a ve. Dimension Grove Ave. East Ave. Etiwanda Ave. Turner Ave. A 44 53 53 44 j 8 44 44 50 44 C 32 46 46 32 D 32 35 36 32 E 470 390 390 470 F 50 60 46• 50 G 50 50 50 47* N 60 68 6B 60 I 60 67 67 60 J 470 480 480 470 K 315 390 500 L 44 53 53 44 M 44 44 50 44 N 35 46 46 32 V 30 ,1] JO JZ P -- 390 390 470 Q -- 66 68 60 R -- 67 67 60 S -- 61 61 47• T 50 50 50 U -- 480 480 470 V -- 365 440 --- All dlmenstons in feet. * - Existing; subject to eventual widening (11 - For Neuman Avenue, T~47* CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT c~ ~~ v >, iz ~~'~ 6 i? - I>- t9;~ 1 GATE: May 27, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Camnission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Krouti 1, Senior Planner Alan Marren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A public hearing and wor s oD to consi er t e provtstons of the Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan I. BACKGROUND: At the May 18, 1987 special meeting, the Planning Dion reviewed the Community Design and Architectural Standards provisions and nearly completed an analysis of the Land Use regulations. At this meeting, the Planning Commission should complete the review of Part III, Development Standards, with emphasis on permitted uses. Provided for your rcvier are the fallowing materials: 1. Land Use Summaries, in matrix fana. 2. Amended Land Use/Development Standards (Because of larger format, these are distributed separately.) For the purposes of discussion, review of the Land Use Summaries is all that is necessary at this time. II. DISCUSSION: The amended Land Use charts provide the following c anT ges: o A revised listing of uses, more consistent with activities listed in the City's Development Code. In addition, the dining activities have been listed together under restaurants. o Changes to the approved activities as recommended by the Commission have been noted. In addition, staff recommendations are underlined for Commission consideration, as follows: ITEM F PLANNING COIMISSION oTAFF REPORT Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan May 27, 1981 Page 2 Authorized Conditional Use Use Permit Planning Commission Staff Recommendation x o Staff recommendations are included to provide more consistency among the Subareas, and to make the Plan more canpatible with the City's Development Code. The Commission will note the increase in activities for the regionally related commercial district (RRC) of Subarea 4, The Commission should advise staff if these uses are appropriate and if the fallowing development provision can provide sufficient guarantee for regionally related types of development: *"Commercial/Office uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one (1) mafor regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or proJect." Finally, the Planning Commission should review the site development standards (setbacks, minimum lot size, etc.) for each subarea and activity nntPA IrPfer in na mac a_F 0_tn o_11 0 1S n 1. Ind ~_ 20) and advise staff of any desired modification. III. RECOMMENDATIQI: It is recommended that the Planning Commission compTiis initial review of the Draft SDecific Plan and provide consultant and staff with direction for amendment where needed. The hearing should be continued to June 24, 1981 at which time a revised Plan will be submitted for Planning Commission review and action. Resp ully s 'tt / 3rad B ler City` tanner 86:AW:ns Attachments: Land Use Summaries, in Matrix Form Modified Land Use Chart and Site Development Standards (Distributed Separately) ~~ GROVE AVE. W c s s a m s BAKER A a VINEYARD AYE. v a s N NELLMAN N a rn 3 ARCNIBALD AVl. C '{1 s ~ ~ 2 ~ TURNER AVE. W 0 C r NAYEN AVE. m a v N m n ~ ETIWANDA AVE. "~< a o Z S/ D PEIeI1TiE11 AIO OOITIDMAL Ilse' Subrea 6n Sihrx iwo Subrx 7. SWrx For Retail Cossrcial Use - SC Q 0 IR P SC CC 0 tilt SC Q LO 11A fq 0 III/A CC ImC tq LI fU/A Antique gr,ps z X % % X Ppprel: al Souk pits N N X X X% N I X K bl IMlexle i Distant Strn 0 A O D O g A (ppliuKe Sties and Rgair % X X X % A't~ IAnic~ and Phvtographlc 6tudias and Supply Stores % % X I X X X X X Xs X Athletic rd Health Etas rd Height Reducing Clinics 1 0 A O X O D % Xt 0 Auta SRVice Strtim D O 0 0 d 0 Auto Ssrin (including ertrcycln~ bxts~ Vailrs~ caAersl: al Saln 41N ancillry repair facilitin) 0 0 0 0 bI Reittls N I z % r cl Repair (xjr egine wrk~ ~ ~ ip olstwyl body wk aM dl Cainbp Mashing 0 - el Autoaetic Mash:nq 0 /l Prts and Supplin N % X X Bakrin Irrtail mlyl % z I I X N X X I ~ X Bubr and ewty Strops % % I I % % % I S 1 N %a % Ded L breakfast 0 0 D - - - - Il Bicycle Slsps X % % X % % % ILa Blueprint and Phrtacapy Service N% x 7 1 % X N 1 Bosky 6ift~ and Statimryy Slrn lothar than adult relatad xtriall N% I X X X X% I X N M Cully and Cmfecti omen % X X 7 X%% X N %+ z Gtring EstaDl isheeits % X ~ X X % X Lhina and 61 as>trre Stain X X I N X N % Ma [Ari stns ira! Sale Late lapratinq m a leyrry basis) I X X % Gr~hn --- D 44 44 - D D Cleaning all Pressing 6tablisMsnts N X %( N I X N N X M Cattail Lunge Ibri laege tavrn) ~ ialuding related Mer ai~rent o a D O Q o g- - - Caeerud Aevxtlm: al tMmr use suds a howling srk billyds 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 bl Outdar use sucfi x temis uM baskethall 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Conralescort Fxil itin all tknpi tats g 0 4 Q .- - 4 - - - Cwtun and Drapwy Shgs % I If I N % % Day Care Centre O N- D O g - p 0 - 4 Oelicrtnsens and Specialty Faad Stain I X % 1 % N I % % Xa % Oruq Stan arM Phrexin M I % X X % Fears nartets % A % 3 X Flour Cavrinq gags % 5~~ N 1 X X X FL.. ist Shays N% X t I% X t% 1 X 1 ~/ PEleltTfm dl0 Cl1OITI0pl 15E!' Aeta:.l Lrawcial Uses - 5uhrx (M SC 6 0 IR P SYhYx it SL CC 01111 51hafN 1. SC 6 m llA 1/1 0 111/A 96area Far LL RPC K1 LI IU/A Fvnitve Stara X % X N % X % Nrdwre Styx X % N N X Hobby Shops X% X X X N i Na X Ice Gw Stmn and Soda Fantain X I N[ N N X i 1 1e Janitorial Srvicn and GpplXn X X X N 1 Na Jewlry Starx % X X i N N % N lautrY (Self Service) N N N 0 % 4 Lather Sootls ald t,gpaq. Stvx 7 7 l i N N X X lip,v Stara o a p a o o z Hnssnger aM Mire Ssrvicn I% X I t i X Ma 14si c, Dance, and Hartial arts Studi 0 % - i X X 0 N % M++sP+p+r and HagaxiM Stvn % N X l i i ~' X X I X Xa X Mvfrin a Brdr S,pply Stan fl Nin sn[lowd rx % i % X A IIt41Cf, 1Y{IMf{ Hd1IM ild (.09Y1R CagMHnt Slvr 7 7 X I X X X X X N Paint, Blau, and Msilpapr Stvn X X % X 1 Pet Shays i % X N X X N Ne PhataapY 1 1 I X ; j~ X %e Retard aM Tape Slvn i N A% 1 7 % i % X Restavants (tit dan): al Mith eitertail~t ntl/v serrinp b alcoholic Dever hl Inndertial xrving of hear and +iM IrithaR a cxktail large, bar, entertainsrt~ v dancirgl cl Lafe Iiutsd to ZO sits (inciWinq a,ttlov sxtlnpl dl Fast Fad I•ith trivrthrul 0 0 7 0 1 % 0 6 0 0 N 1 % % 0 7 0 0- %- % % i 0 0 0 0 0 X % II 0 % % II D % Shoe Stan, 41e and Ilgair % % i i X N 1 X X ~ % Sparti np fiaods Stvx: al Speculty)) MadgacY~nnqq~. terms, skiiinq, eantun- eerinp fi~inq, ftc. el 6enwa~i sncayaxinq variety of (ports puipext X X X N A X G X N X % 0 SupervkNS X i X % ~ Goring Paul Supplir N 1 % I C .aliK n s % X l i T% 1 i i Tllevl el m, Aadla, ~, $tMea and m CaAmant Sales X N % X N ioy Stvr X N I% I A N X Variety Oepartesnt Stvx, Smly Osprteent Styx O IJ Il d 0 7 N i VlLKInYY Idorsticl: al Mm-0ortlirp bl Bordlnp 7 0 0 1 0 0 X A 0 0 N O % r Wtch nd Clock Rspur $tves 1 1 1 1 I I X X X X X Yu .qe Saads Starr A ~/ X X N 1 "/ FFIMITIFD Alo lnO1TINYIL ~ 9Ersa f11e ABrsa iss 9brN 1. SIOrN Far Fntertai~t and CWtmd UaN - ~ ¢ 0 IR P SC ¢ tl fM SL 6 W L711 hA U 111/R ¢ NC Mt LI 111/R RrcatlN tl 0 U 0 tl 0 tl tl CWtval/Rrtist Fi:hieits: fa1N II X el ~ :t ah h1t~ N tl Y 0 A ~ oiecothegrs o- o tl o o N N ThNSRS: al tlinnm thtatre U U U 0 U Q -- m Ibvie cna,tm a o o - - d{fica and Rbinistrative UsN - ALarN ON Q ¢ tl 1P P AlrN Tw 9C ¢ U MR RIIhrN ThrN SC ¢ C9 L!P fA U NI/A 90arN Far ¢ NC IR LI MI/R RdeiniNratiM; MlneN~ aM PrafegiaW OHlcs N 3 X X S I I X I 1 I Ne Il lAeinaN and O1fin 9rvicw X M A I I N X X Finance SmVICN and INeftulian I A X 0 1 I N N X U ! S Interim dcmatinq Flftl I N I A I A X A X X IkdiW /paMel Of{icN aM Relatd Health Llinin X X N N f A X 0 X ¢ ~tician and fptaesVical 9p/e X I X I I I X U N Ia RNltms and Anal Estate tlificN X X X A X A X N X I X di I Trmi Rgencin I I I A A A I X I A X Aa I 91erM One SWrN Tss SubrN Thr[e ABrN Far RNidential Ihes - I AL ¢ tl 111 P 1 9C ¢ 0 11N 1 3 ¢ W L1F 1N U 111/A ¢ NIL IN LI t4/N Single Faeily Datadhtd X A b I ~i 'liaiw~i i i J~ ry tri play farpieal ~aV R~ 1 A I X N I N IlUtiirily pwllings I N N M % N Mc111ry RNidmtial Uw: al Norcre falitiN 16 m lessl A N X X I X X el Qr-site priwte remNtiai facilitiN % A X% I N I RccNSmy MINE al Ikcesvy stnctmN I N A I I N N al Ibse mngtim N I I I X X I Puhlic uses - RuharN Olle st ¢ o m P 91;brN Teo s~ ¢ 011n SubrN TIrN sc w W tm re u rU/A S10arN Far ¢ NIC tP LI Ml/R Trans;t Fxili[iN Publ¢ Utilay InsGllattml 1 industrial UsN - I ~ ¢ U I11 P I SL ¢ OTN1t I~9Cr fA llft MI U MIIA I arMC RII LI AU/N 5~3 n 1911ITiFD f1e momowlt ue IbtN Uw - ~0 IP P ~~ OTMp ~a Cp LMI 111 U IU/R ~RrNC !R LI M1/N Xotsl iscllitlss IrlQl X fXCillry Uasu al T~~ ~ of Gfa Y cl Gteinnqq 4~ricu dl t'aktu'I p sl Calfr~c~ ian X fellitiss p fl Florist eYga X 1 Gift ~s R X I IYrgy.,llgsxina Sto.. X it PMrsaciM X 11 Raftarad:s Isit dsrll X MI Twist IMarrtian X !1 Trax! Ngen:in X S/T n '23 d '~ ~. ,~ o~ d .o 5/S ,, Jq, \. 'lovi i. z s` 3 K o. c, o, O x ° O O x• O of x O x x o,X O O 4 x X '0X X X .~ x •~~ux x x X k x x x x % x X X u a ~ r - ~ :,max T 4 ~ s a ;~ W a=~a - ~~ ~g Q ~ g ! :af . o :m ? z g ~ ` Z~ LL ab~~f ~.~5 y e 3 3YL' W ~ 3 _ P ~'~• :` d a=te : Je~ i ~ ~. ~~~ M ~ • ~ : ~ ~a3ge _ • a ;~ ~ ~: ~ ? ~ = ~z g V ~ {[ ~JeA ~ ` a b S ~ ~ O • C LL i LL S ~ ~ • 5 U u V V V ~ O O LL < 6 0 i a o x o ., x u x W x x o ox x x x a x x w ~ x xo x x o x x o x r e ! pSS . 9 , w N t~ °e ~_ de Y a E YTi ~ T ' G± S~~xr e ~ rn 6 NC 8y 's F ~~r „ yp,~ Y •"xJI :: u3 ~ 9~y ~+ 0 c s` i 3 ~ S S7G 9 i~+ ~T v'i37 n~ vZC ~ i~ • y m u~i ~ 01 2 a ~ ~= n° '~ o u i s _ ~ i i 3 ~ 3 ~ ~ a ~^'m ~ ~ w~ ¢ ~//f ~. ~ ~~.~ C 2 C U 1~ K O ~ X X >~ x0 x x t X x ~ 0 O U F y 9 y~ N~ u9 a v~ 5e FYa ~ W tj '! r i i i i t e W oO C Fc ~ N S ~~ ~ i ~s ~ t a ~ u 2 s` ~' a OI x x O a O O U W X O XX ~ O N X ~+ a '~ ~ T • ~ G ~ p G~ sP ~~ 2 W Q : ~~• a ~~ _ ]]] ~ V ! ~ _ a ~= ~ a ~ y ` ` ' L < u a c ` o x x x *I OI x X O~ X x x x x X % O % ~~ ~' X x x x XIX 0 0 X X x O x x O X VI rC B w ^A •4 - o - -~ m.^y P~ ~~~ . M N ~~ N ~ ~~ o V~ s~ o u i dp S4 z ~ . ..yU b9 h r Y~ ~ C ~~ ~ y ~~~ _ ~/~ :/,~'~ Y " ~ U \' Ytl iO 3Y d 9 C a~C Y X I~ a ~~, ~O LEy ~~ F+;s•~~ S~ „-~a ° p •~~=E' 3 s o ~Ea-.2 ~. - s3+'"3E~ iD7 'o° = d-u-_=E Y N F~g$s~a~ ~j fC{C ~y LL Q G~ ~ .~YCaO •VV ~„ S fib>~_sa M' X % x { x x k x k V e C• .. ~ i ~ LL w i W~ ~ oy u l YV L E ~~ ~ O e ~~3~~ x X p X x 0 Y = e n S R F Y y s Y S '~j f S b U o'~ Y x x x x x x J • ~ Y a ' ~ - e 3 ~ s Y:, ~ s R X Xu ~ u~~~ M o <~ ~ "~ P ~' >, ~ 8 t X E _ ~E r T ~ o o ( 0 0 li 4S~ ~ V 1 r 1 ry p L q G N N • < < < < a ~ _~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~w ~ : , y ~ i % ~ B ~ X' ~° : t ~ ~ ~ ~ . .. • T 4 ~ ~ j 9 S° J k : __ - ~ Y _ _ Oi = e ^ _ y = ~O~ C ` E Fi O ~ V J i ~ O - • E ~•`~j E ~ 9i s _ V ~YSag [~ ~ s _ i a a ~ .. : ; LL O 0 ~ 5 ~a~~ } o _ F e V V N 3 O J' C Q 1 e .~•. C N r j y~ O u J J 5 J 3 O~ ' 3 E i V i a N O o E E E E J _ -- c ~ ~ C ~ ~° e # E i E J J E ~w D uo 3 E E ^ k •i _ ~ 3 O ~p LL g 3 3 ] 2 uN .„ „ ~ Y 6 r r ~~ ^ n - M ~ 0 L LL E N ~~ ' a a .. ~ ~+ ' ~ v Y s si s s ~ 3!$ ~ k k i ~ P>Pi Pi Pi W G y ~d~d Y .d-O 4~ ; f ~ w • W W ___ W (f 1 ~• ~ O O O W C iu !~ AO O~O{ / LL -~r~ Y Yi $ y ~ 1 L! LL S < Y < < , a y ~' NC S ~ O e ~^ n X ~ Y ^~ O O C O O P~ • S EF MN 01 N 1 ~~ N N N n ry b .., e o v v • S ~ ~ ~~ ckc 4 LL ~ ' i ~ r g ~ €~83 O ; ~G - L W WS ~ WSW i3 m -' -d_ _a-€ i ~ LL S~ `'e - ci 3 Y6 kU % % 9 ~ 6 i¢iV Y i~ LL LL k y~ J i G < t << N O O C O O ~ O O l J~ n n ~ R nns S N QV N ~S n ~ "^a ° ~ s ~ ~~S T .j o .[gip S ~ k Z ~ S•~.~~.i i~ a~ CC 4 ± 1 _ a a ..N~?YJ~ ' Jak y! ~ ; O OarV~i6CO Y NY ~y Oc3 J J J ~~ T O f N S' V S O S/ S .~ ~ ~ c n _ E f" ~~ P 't3 d '~ d ~] O d S~ ~ N 4 In~ VI o u u xo x x o ox x x x uui x xo x x x s ~~ 'FY Y c ~ ~gr fay ~ ;; _ C~=: ;FMS ' 4 a 5~ ` ' ~ ALL. L = din e ~ o s „~ 3 C S ~ i+ u. r a s $ ~~~~ h e ~,e~~ a~= g ° ~~ ~ s~ do u j .' ~ R •a t ~ z au v9: 4 g ~ n a 1 0 o i a ~i a pg,gy ~ ~ s O7u ]_T: T S O u C ~ r .: •_ 0 ~ ?H,.: Tr S N^ CQ .Eg- <~ ~ ~~fimN ~'~~Y a~e F~?:+ ,m. ~.<a 8. !'i Pik ~4 ~~ ~h~ru ec a / v , ~ , d u ~ ~"I sl ` O o % x a x U M X a~y~% %% O X X X X M%% X O " x c lJ % Y O % x O N %%% X O S X ~.. m y ~ N " ^ ., • ~ ° ~ ptp g ~ ^r Our iT~ 2 ~j yyi pQ ~ N G~ ~~ a .."O R~ O i u °~ gg L 3i ~ = E5; 4~ ~ N °~; m~m ram ~ 'i ~ .S~ = 8F~3` 93 ~f ~ $ i ;":"via:~., u~. ~ :`.e 39Z' g diN "~? S; Su u ~ M ° .ins°`:•'•9 ~Vo 5 9 <'~ ~ _~_ ~_;~~ i i o i i s a ~n a u x x o x x ~ i x u c x x k v x~ x x yx a O w x % Yx x x N O X O % i X X _ X xi % %x% i y " i ^_ a € ~ g 2 .~ °~ z ~ E a ~ ~+ 9 : ; = 3 .~ = g „ ~ w L ~ ~ a= 3 e s~ s y _ ~ € ~g~ Y 39 ~ ~ E L~ E ; ~; ~ . ~~ S i ~~ g1 0 ~ ~ 8~ B g ~ ~H: g 3 0 ; 9: ~ aB , g C ~ F k~„ 3 ~~ ~ eY ~ ~ ~ ~ b 3 _ 7 ,~ Yam m q p ~ u u'"'>8 v ~ u uu u d8 0 ! °ar u i .7 .9 N v, J F ~ q''aw u ~ I ~ ~ ' 8 O x ~ x % X x x X , ~ ~ " wi ~ x X x x% X ; ~ x o x K x a F - >? v 6 ~ Y ~ o ~ _ O _ 3 : ~ C t N ~' a V ~ ~ , W r ., _ ~ c 2 - S O ~- Y c . g~ 0 ~ _ x W 8_ n N Si is g C B =" g e ~ -, - a - ie a 3 as ~ = s s~ ~~ o - ]I < ~ \ ~ _ O K _ 1' _ _ E 0 a s 0 0 0 0 U % k % XX% i % wi %O % % WU O O Op U JI x X wr x y y Vi O '0t O p °u I e pin-~, s ~ s` ` I _ ... s § e s 6 p~ 8 Y ` ~ U ~ C~I y~y^ ~~MCCO 4 K Y• N y ~ ~ w ~ _ w~r• ~ !C _ ~ C or. . fE V~ ~- O y - • , ; G P Y~ ~ q.. N'C`+S~ y YN cN if' 9y+ Y o 2. N ~ y , W C ! y n s q_ - ~ ~a " ~ x • T 8 E e i ~gl F 3 ^~ } Y ~^ _ _ _ f• i i E(E( i $i~ ~ i5i~ >? jf ~ Y~Y" d SX YV - i i s < ~~ 1 V V _ _ L V w n n n n J i < ~ 6 r L • +p - i ~ ~ ~ d ~ d tdF~ € ~~3i f • dYII q(+ i ~f" ~ Y d j~5~2 i~~ ~ :=: . iii P : I ~ X M M Ilp 11 3 ' ~_ ~ .€ 1 g:~ .M i~~ s t~ 5 Y3i F iZ.Y ; ! % S i+ 3 ~ ~16 p ~ ~g ~ ~~,~ lY~~~p V { Y:~ ~Je~: ~`'~~ ~~f3it~ a ~~I~::' .-.:l $ Xiil ~ ;~~y{~~~~y~ ~} ~~ ..t ia(~'~?fa ~( Q '~ '~ d G] sas x x b x a a o e % K a 2 u i 4~ ~ d 3 Y~ j ~~ a a of a a a W M q x x xox OI 00% x a x x x x aN o x N d( o o k x k M O% % .'# % % y O ~ N •Fj kO ~ • 8 [~$ g~ v .~ ~ 6j. ~ s a' y Cg~~ ~i :j F3da .. 5~ r3 !$~ z} W 'fig $a ~' a ~~dJ3~~ g ::} jl~~~ ~~W . a ~~ ~ ~~fa€ 8 i'~ e:e ~ : ~t~ ~°~€~ j:e ~ j t'~?e - a ~ Si :r9~ei~:' Sri. e_ es 1'~ ex 3 a;; :: a i ~ 3 ~~ a a e e ;, ~ 8 a n u ~u ~^ s a v x of M V x x O OM ~ ~ $ yV O Y 3 ~ yy ~ 'a a j r ~ 4 f $~ p , E ~'" 5 3 Y ~ o :- ~ y ~j Y ~ Y ,A ~~: e i ~ Y ~ 3 3 5~~-~ ~~} ~ n~ ~ ` ' CnO Nln ul ~~~ ~( ~~b AOAlU If E i x e o x x x i a a a +~ x % %a % y p % O % x ox 'b x x x x x% p x0 % '~ x o % x o. % % ° % L ~ aca ~„~ ~ ~ 3 f~l. y ede~ b~C =i.• y s~ ^ ~ i ,b a°„ e Y 3 is4e 5 F_. 'g sage ~~Yi:9?~ a s- #- ~~~ i ~y6 i_ ~_~~~' alai ~: ;' x D x ~ x x x N x a 0 % a s ~ N ~i H nl X tl H N V % K % % Ai % % x % % O y~ % % M x M x o-~i . %~ x x x x ~ x % a p ( ~ 0 E ~I x n' 2 u c~ n o ~ a i a = 2 J ±~ /~ VI O u ~ X c _ v~ u +~ X '• LL ' g ° u N ~ % i~ Cu s L- ~~ 'r = o r ~ ~~~ ~ o . JN< 4 ~ O _ _ ~ • ~ r ££ 3 5 a U ~ 1 ~ Yd y~ X w ,. ~~vvn eoxl~ x ,' '• N x x X % x x x x x x x C Y ~ s ~ - L a ? r r: ~, ~ o._ `~ - Z Y :o _ ~°S- S 8 p 3 ~ • S dB ! " ~ w S F E' 3 ~ ~ N N y • J f w = O O O Y ] a U % i~t % % % % % X X u l u ~ o ~ ~ Il k M % x x w x u x l N u of xx = o ~ " ~ x " i i i i ~ o 3 ~ = F 2 a • _ o L 7 . Y J Y V iX 'O ~ ~ y SQ `~ L1 ~ B_• T - ~~ L~ ~O C • Nq ~• C O~ ~ O N M W : • ~ i~ ap O ~ 8 `~ ~~~ • ~~ = L i~ O e : ~ 3 ~~ g K ~ _a ] s _ `; ; a~~ 3 • 3 S a ~r S x ^ u • : n ~ r ~ 8 ,"° 3 ~"° B6 ! ! ~ ~ = w F ~ V ! P ~ w ] ~ L S 0 ~ i i ! ~ i 7 u y r < Ol ~ ~ ~ ` ~ L W o n ~, Y ~ i~ wr N "M J kT - " .. e LL - E e _ ` n 1 ^ W r » w - 4 y F F g F o Y c ~ S~s( ier s~j'n~ gSA ;SAS _ ~ • £ W5 W V x W W y a ~ F r 9g9 aka - ~ W , ~ a ~ i°i~ n Y i ~ ! LS a o ~ e o ~ a o Wi 3 --~~ ;~ i ~~ $~. ~.~3 . vain;i~i''_- '~~-_~~ ~ ~. ~~"~~ .~ ~rl-Y a o~.V VI O-~ ae< yya~ •~ Yov4 ~ ~.~iAA ~r~ r $iii~iu Fie#~-'1~~#~"j •~ 6 $ l J ti ~ z z b ~#i : - ~ g - b rym. 1.~ T .. ~ i i v ~ r + A ' _ ~ ..~ _~~: ~ . g~ ~ o~~ . ~ - GY=•'i ~' F9 ~ i NQB~~ A $. " ~ N~ ~ O ~~ Y'Z~A ~ L V+ ~ u o '~i W 0 9 3 ~ o 6 'Fs ~' S" Y ih x' ~; € ¢ E g •~ ' a ~a E Y : AAA E € @ i 9 3 R 3 i saq v.'"9.u E-.>~ you ~ $o .c-`a~it~ !tea c= ~ ~ I ~ ail f,:C Cai[O_O ~>O CN \ .{ral1J ~ Y_S.e~53o..g~, :. ~^ o~ ~ ~''a"ru~o,~~ EWS wYY N Yi gd 00 ~_~\ s t ~acQ' i~•! -~ = 0 S Y'F''•'o v'~ pj: ''~' M y y • F Ii N6 N18i~LLV~JBn` Fi6aw 2tnw :~'~:~::~::•i::•::~:•:::,i C •~1 ~ ~ .: :.. k a~i=~- ~ ~ -1I'~ c -til 9 Nr~ - m ` '\i n ~ r v ~ ~ 3 S55"= 5'=`= i L 6 6 S E ~€y~ .. s~a- ` ~ =d ~o r ~~o ~o a ~ w~w3 Wfw ~~ ~~ ~ sas! s,s~ mA r E a >~ • Y Yu ~ 11~Yu .~n z a ~ I t' ~ vv,~~ J u u < < 4 { _~~~_ a Ms rnnYnl'Q t~° s ry,.,,N~~ - Y~~~ 4 S £3 ~, - ~ _ - ~. i i ~ v ~ ~ s _ `s = ~xs~~~ J~a ~ f i N !: O 'gn~V~ar~ ~ NiiS C S J J J C; Y' OF N O V~ 0 3 ~ E - - - 9 e':~ •~ } E _~ E c P• a ua ^ E'Jn ~ r c c c 3 O T o LL 3~ s~= 53~ ;. '~ d "d C3 Z3 m ~o Sal J ~ ` . ~ ,~ ~ , ,~ \ ~`~ _ ! h rcl P 1y^' I ~ ~ x x a x c a x . c X ~ a ~ a z N N X ^ X a X N C O x ~I x F Nx x x N +N N tUl X X y X X X O X x y+c - x n Nx 4x x n x ~'Fx i e~ c _ C y t =$ .,. LL C N~ r3 a e ~• g C i Y T ^y m a o ~' N ~L `~ W a ~ °` Jt 8 s o • ~ i Y Y i`~~• V 6 ~ t Y C L C 6 8 • - ~ • w •L ~ p~~ a Y 3 ~~ • ~ Y ~ ~3: a 9 g~ E •~ a s 5:~ ~ ~ O T V S - p JL g Y C s a ~ x x • % a N T ^ ~~N ~ `w q VET • ~ d a _ u V K N X X O O W .~ M FI F xI a o 0 C p p c C U X X O X a ), x FI M1I tl tl O m gr yE OGN ~ Y a i m S+r •• ~ ° ~ 2 F.~ `,~~ ? ~ °P Y ~ boa I ^~ J ~ T i. „ l d ~~ N O u S •~ ~ _ VC Y~w •±L w Y OuL 0 i ~ <Y Y ~ 3 C ~m a ~° $ „ % J 3 :_ ~ - G `~Wv 3d ~.. `~~n do ~i E a ~ ~ ~ N, x x x CT i ,yn~ 'I J j Y I J f ¢ N x Ma 4 V ¢ O % as a ~" N ~ N y~ W u x x xo x x u oN~xaa ~ N xNx x x x ~k % a o s s' m a Y 2 a S h _ ~ ~m 7 ~ N o` ,; ~ 4i M u a N~ g CN ~C ..F Ya ~~O ° K x w E N _ 31 O ~ • _J ~ ~ jj~~~ ~i~ {~= ~0 ~~~ n YYYp 'C Y. C LO~ > V y o~~ ig W3 p[ L y y S G ~A M 6 V ', ~ j ; S > ~ , ~ ~ . ~J~J 1 < i~~ y C 120 C h ~ W S ~ X O a rt O i x J 6 Z U K X M N X XNN W NI o % y O y~ XNXM % u % % % % % % XNx % % O x yl o% XN%MX N g' a ~ a t ~' r a' a"~ "a~ =~y ~a' ~ ~~~ a as as ~ acv aEi Y x s ~ ~a a. g s: ~ ~~nmw~~ a ~88_- ! ~~~ ~~ ~ d t S 9~, Y'~> ~ a ~,„ o V V V+ y Z CyOVOVOVy .~ ,,-i 3 J P o x x x x x x x o x d w <"'d ' q L a u or 2 m ° ; o • ~, '~ ~ 8 > ~ '~ g t E S =a D ' s '~ 2 ~ G s - c ~ _ u RR ~ ~ ' 3 i Y ~ ~ e ` c o a s ~' a a ~ 3 ~ ~ _ A L .i x x x x x ~. w x x x x x fr 4 u ;; ~ i Y _ t g P ~: ~ 2 Gant ° ~ t 3 Y ya _ 3 := A 8 ~ ~ T < P 5 O O G < Y O P O !a i P ~ •~ ~ ~ _ n ~ 3~ S e . ,~ v~ e ~~n do ~i U x xxox oxxxxxxx h ~° 'c G _ yp~ ~ _z" igu Sccyy ° - k ~ ~S~ ~ 'Ei _'a ~ F=;_ ~axc_~ q _j-Ywut ~~~~_ ILL C < 00000 0000000 x° DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SU&IECT: May 18, 19W CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF BEPOftT Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner Alan Marren, Associate Planner ~~~ ~,~ ~ ~. ,,. s, ,~ ~; ~ r iix FBI ~ ~2 1971 ( FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A public hearing and wor s p cons er a prov sons of the Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I. BACKGROUND: This meeting is a continuation of the Planning owe~C- s Ton workshop review process for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan which was initiated on April 30, 1987. At that meeting, the Planning Co~TSSion provided the plan consultant and staff with direction on the primary policy issues and a good portion of the secondary policy issues. Tonight, we anticipate that we will complete the secondary issues and begin a page by page analysis of the standards and regulations. further, any additional comments on the Comaunity Background (Part I) and Development Framework (Part II) of the text should be brought up at this time, II. PROGRESS TO DATE: On April 30, 1981, Planning Caanission direction was prov a on a foil wing issues: Issue: The Plaming Ce~9ssion should deterdne the appropriateness of the overall corridor design concept in attaining a unique and unifying design for Foothill Boulevard. Tile Planning Commission voiced favorable comments regarding the overall concepts of activity centers and gateways to conjunction with the suburban parkway transitions. More emphasis was suggested for the gateway concept in presenting a positive community taentity. Same concern was voiced over the "formal" design concept of the activity centers. It was felt that a strict formal concept might not be compatible with same of the existing development ;especially in the Sycamore Inn/Bear Gulch area j. issue: Should the co~erelal/office acreage along the torrldor be increased from 262 acres to approxtntely 369 acres. ~~s PLANNING COMMISSIO' AAFF NEPORT Foothill Boulevard ,pecific Plan May 18, 1981 Page 2 The Commissioners voiced some concern over the level of commercialization, but were generally canfortaUle with the reyional -related commercial activities proposed adjacent to the I- 15 Freeway. The Commission recoynized that the regional related commercial area forms the majority of the commercial acreage increase. Issue: Should the regionally related commercial zone al law for businesses rhich will not only coRleeent but mmy also compete with the business types anticipated for the future eallt The Planning Commission felt that Lhe uses allowed within this district should be expanded to include many of those contained in the proposed Community Commercial zone, to allow greater ranye of uses. This recaaaendation was made with the provision that same mechanise be included in the plan which requires the development of a regional related commercial use within each development. Issue: Cana commercial/residential eixed use scenario be planned and developed successfully Isder a easier plan concept? If so, what specific uses could be appropriate within this Land use category? The mixed useJ retail (MU/R) zone concept was accepted by the Commissioners. The requirement of master planning was the key to the Cammf ssioners' favorable view. In one of the areas on Foothill Rm,levarA whore hhn MII/m Aictrir4 and /~e a~n.,a~~ viewed as an epportuni ty for property owners to work together ~~on master planniny large sections of land which currently exhibit significant development pro6l ems. Issue: Does the Specialty Camnercial designation provide sufficient activity allowances and appropriate lieitations to ensure specialized developnent of key points of interest and landearks7 The use of the Specialty Commercial designation to fine tune the development potential of activity centers of special significance was favorably received. Review of the district reyul ations is still needed to specifically define appropriate uses and standards of development for each area. Issue: Are traffic control mmeasures appropriate to ensure a safe circulation systee while providing adequate access for the viability of commercial developeents7 PLANNING COMMISSIO ;TAPE REPORT Foothill Boulevard ,pacific Plan May 18, 1987 Page 3 The Commissioners concurred with the need to implement median island construction, intersection improvemeMS, and access limitation regulations in order to successfully handle the anticipated Lraffic along the corridor. Issue: The Plaming CoaaHssion should consider the appropriateness of the reeaa~ended augment of Red Nill Country Club Drire versus the other alternatires. The Commissioners favored the Advisory Committee's recommendation for the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive. Final determination of this alignment is to be withheld until a Clty- inittated traffic study on the area is completed. The traffic study was suggested by the City Engineer in response to a traffic analysis perforwed by the consultant to owners of properties affected by the realignment. Estenstan of Estacia Avenue Issues: 1) Should access be prohibited or severely liadted to San 8ernardlm Road? 2) If so, should access to the area be as proposed? A Planning Commission concensus was reached on this issue which recommends that the Plan include the foliowing: A. Access to San Bernardino Road should be allowed for residential development only, and D. Direct access to San Bernardino Road for commercial uses should not be allowed, and C. Two points of access on Foothill Boulevard and one point of access opposite Estacia Avenue should be identified, around which a master plan for development would be required. Issue: San Diego Aranue realignment. The Commission considered alternatives for the realignment or abandonment of San Diego Avenue. It was determined that the ultimate vacation of son Diego Road Ts desirable but only upon development of an approved master plan for the area between Vineyard Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Flood Channel. Issue: San Bernardino pad Reallgnamnt. The Planning Commission concurred with the proposed realignment of San Bernardino Road. III. DISCUSSION: For this meetiny, the Planning Commission should con nue a review of those items outlined at ..ie AprTl 30 meeting. These issues are discussed in the attached issue papers and include the following: ~3~ PLANNING CDiM1SSI0~ ;TAPE REPORT Foothill Boulevard .,pacific Plan May 18, 1987 Page 4 SECONDARY POLICY ISSUES (Continued from April 30th) o Community Design o Architectural Issues SITE SPECIFIC LAND USE DESIGNATIONS o Automotive Uses within the Corridor o Extension of Community Commercial District northerly along Etiwanda Avenue o Specialty Commercial along the south side of Foothill 1n Subarea 1 o Mixed Use/Retail at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard SUBAREA LAND USE REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS o Master Plan Provisions (pg. 9-1) o Subarea 1 (pgs. 9-2 through 9-6) o Subarea 2 (pgs 9-7 through 9-11) o Subarea 4 (pgs. 9-26 through 9-20) The attached chart shows where we are in the suggested "roadmap" of rev1 ew. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended Lhat the Planning Commission camp e s nitial review of the Draft Specific Plan and provide tsc - "^:.r.t ecd staff wiu~ uirc~Liun for amenomenc where needed.~~+yThe hearing should be continued to a scheduled meeting date at which a revised plan will oe submitted for Planning Commission review and action. Rasp full w milted, Brad q ler City Planner BB:AN:te Attachments: Exhibit 1 - Specific Plan Process Nevlew Chart Exhibit 2 - Issue Papers Exhibits 3 and 4 - Issue Paper Maps ~3 7 N N W U O s C 3 W W C 2 4 J C U tJ W L H J !- O O 8.1 OVERALL COIIUNITT DESIGN CONCEPT (Section 7.5) This section contains specific design gutdetine5 which implement the ob,)ectives of the activity center/suburban parkway concept. The components of this section as noted on Pages 7-5 through 7-8 contain the following components: o Subarea Structure o Activity Center a Suburban Parkway o Overall Architectural Concept o Overall Landscape Architectural Concept issue: The Plaming Camtmission should deter>•lmle the appropriateness of then design campommemmts within the overall design concept for the torrldor. 8.2 ARCHITECTURAL ISSUES One of the more recognizable aspects of a community design image is that of its architectural style. The Advisory Colmittee deliberated extensively on what architectural style should be encouraged as an aspect of cbmmamnity identttY• The importance of this issue is exemplified by the olans Ovrratt ;Lu teAaru: "oval: to create a dynamic concourse that is attractive and of high quality witn a unifying design imaye, reflective of community heritage and identity...." Discussion: Concern was voiced early on that the cammmunity does not have a single identifiable architectural theme, but exhibits a diversity of styles which were identified as winery, mission, California barn, 1930's Route 66, agricultural heritage, etc. The Committee resolved not to limit architecture to a single theme or style. Rather, it was decided that architecture should borrow certain elements from historical styles found in Rancho Cucamonga. This view resulted in an architectural concept (Rancho Cucamonga Heritaye) which: 1. Encourages the use of elements from these types along the Corridor with provisions for design compatibility. 2. The use of a single style of architectural element is not apart of this plan. S"3~ _, 3. Encouragenent of design theses on a sfte-by-site basis is encouraged and provided for at activity centers and key features (Section 8.2 - 8.41. Issue: W11 an architectural prugras Bade up of diffe'ent distinct styles be able W tars a unifying design wncept for the Corridor? Staff Analysis: Staff believes the Advisory Coo.ittee's recaansndation has definite potential within the overall design franework so long as distirot architectural styles/thenes are taplesented at each activity center. In this nannar, ca~patible architectural diversity can act as a unifying eleaent in the suburban parkway streetscape chile naintafning distinct architectural styles at key activity nodes/centers. As an alternative, the Planning Cosalsston nay wish to consider narrowing the band of architectural styles to be designated along the entire length of the boulevard. S/ ~ 8.3 sITE SPECIFIC ISSUES: a. Issue: Should wtomotlve related uses b! eliminated along the CorrldorT The proposed plan permits automotive related uses in portions of the area. However, concerns were voiced that automobile services may not be appropriate along a revitalized Foothill Boulevard and that such uses should be located in the Industrial Area. b. Issue: Should the ca~mity ca~ercial extend northerly an additiawal 380 feet along the nortl~est corner of FootMll and Etiwenda2 Staff has concerns on the appropriateness of extending ca~ercial activity northerly into the prodomtnantly residential Etiwenda Specific Plan. (Exhibit 3) c. Issue: Should the south side of Foothill Boulevard apposite the Sycamore inn be included in the Syxtalty Canneevyal DlstrictT Staff has concerns on the vtab111ty of such a large area designated solely for Specialty Commercial uses. (Exhibit 4) d. Issue: Is the fixed use designation on the north side of foothill, east of Etirenda Mtnue, approprtateT In light of tar Nisei more __....~... ~.1.~,.t ._... .::~:.:.: :.` ca~ercialT Current land use designation Ts Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre. (Exhibit 3) Staff will need the Cawission's direction in these areas C. DEIIELOPMFJR SiA1DABDS The Planning Commission should review the permitted uses in Part IiI of the Development Standards for all land use categories, as follows: o Master Plan Provisions (Pg. 9-l) o Subarea 1 (pgs. 9-2 through 9-6) n Subarea 2 (pgs. 9-7 through 9-11; o Subarea 4 (pys. 9-16 through 9-20) 5`~/ I '~ ~ ~~ I.. t d a G _ p Ernrw~+t rrn ,. vv i, .0 \~~ I ~t. V ~j o j ~ v -~ ~~~ ~, '• I V ~~ ~\ ~C ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ (~uE 3~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 30, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Otto Krautil, Senior Planner Alan Marren, Associate Planner FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A public hearing and wor s op cons r prov s ons of the Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This meeting begins the forwlal public hearing process on the Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan which is the result of an extensive stuQy and analysts by the Plan Consultant (FORMA-Planning NeMork), City staff and the City Council appointed Advisory Committee. The result 15 a document which contains the following motor parts: u Part i, Gammuniry aacxground; o Part 21, Development Framework; o Part II1, Development Standards; o Part IV, Implementation The document format is designed for convenient use and the issues, answers, and implementation methods are Tnterwoven throughout the text. This staff report will attempt to separate the motor and minor issues in a logical format to aid the Commissioners in Lheir deliberations. A suggested "road map" for the review 1s depicted on Exhibit "A". The review process will be through a series of Tssue papers which address Lhe three mayor concepts (Community Design, Land Use/Economics, and Traffic). Each issue paper contains key tnfor,Aatton, describing: 1. Nhat the plan does; 2. What the issues are; and 3, Staff position. f; <i ci r ^i C FBI V IZ .~„ D 19ii J T~ PLANNING COMMISSION .AFF REPORT Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Apr11 30, 1987 Page 2 It is suggested the review process be conducted in the following manner: 1. Review all primary "big picture" issues in the area of design, land use, and circulation, then; 2. Review all secondary issues within each mayor plan area, then; 3. Review of specific design guidelines and development standards. In an effort to better identify the varying aspects of the boulevard and address their unique needs, the plan divided the corridor into four geographic subareas as follows: Subarea 1: Frain Grove Avenue easterly to Vineyard Avenue. Subarea Z: Frain Vineyard Avenue easterly to Hellman Avenue. Subarea 3: From Hellman Avenue easterly to Haven Avenue. Subarea 4: The I-15 Freeway easterly to East Avenue. Subarea 2 Foothill 4 Subarea I TI v( ~ ~ B G Z M These subareas will be referred to frequently 1n Lhe tent as part of special design guidelines and development standards. 5 ~S In addition, there is a lot ccosolldatico program as part of the development standards and m impiementaLlm part which will be revised and expanded substantially as a result of Planning Corsi ssico determinations co ma,~or porticos of the document. Finally, the whole process will include review of a focused environmental Impact report to consider any significant impacts which may result from the pro,~ect. This document will be fonrarded to the Planning Comatssion for puD11c hearing review during the review of the Draft Specific Pian. Recammendatton: IL Ts recoarended Uwt the Planning Caarissicoers review the mtlrc document in preparation for the first meeting. Staff anticipates that we will De able to complete reviers of the 'big picture" iteas and work well into the seccodary Issues at the first meeting. If the Co~isstco completes their review of the primary and seccodary issues at this meeting, staff would recomaend that we proceed Into Lhe dlscussico of the Standards/Regulations portion of the review process. Respe fully submitted, Brad gul er City Planner 88:oK:te Attachments: Exhibit 1 - Specific Dlan Review Process Chart Issue Papers co Design, Land Use and Clrculatlon Under Separate Cover - Fcoth111 Boulevard Specific Plan 5~f~ m _` x w N N W V O K C 3 w w Z 4 a U W a N ti O O cowwln oestsr• A. CDRRIDDR DESI6M CDNCEPT The post significant physical feature of the Plan is the proposed design pethod to visually unify the pro,)ect area. This aspect of the project was stated as a pripary goal in the Foothill Corridor Interip Policies which states in part, 'ta establish a high quality, attractive, and unifying design labge reflective of cappunity heritage'. The acceptance of the Plan's concept will set the stage for general design of the Corridor and this feature shouid be adaptable to changes in other significant elepents of the Plan (i.e. Land Use, Circulation, etc.). Discussion: The Plan calls fora series of highly identifiable activity centers and gateway features which are linked Dy a unifying suburban parkway design as follows: 1. Activity Centers: acriyTw r~..r. ... _•_ -f trio; -- - - F_~,... ,. ~,t ya~~ra11~ located~at pa,jor intersections and/or landparks along the Corridor. They are to provide individuai identity by concentrating coppercial activity at the following areas: o Foothill at Bear Gulch o Foothill at Vineyard Avenue o Foothill at Archlbeid Avenue o Foothill at Turner Avenue o Foothill at Etiwanda Avenue Foothill a v c e a ti N w ~~ Activity Centers Gatevaya 1 S~~ These nodes will generally exhibit acre formal urban design characteristics. Specific criteria is developed for each node in the Subarea Oesi gn Guidelines sections 8.2 through 8.5. 2. Suburban Parkway Transitions: This feature links the forml streetscape ax:anderln9/undulating landscaping. activity nodes with a less design to include sidewalks with informal Issue: The Planning Coaadsslon should deterarine the appropriateness of tMs caACepi 1n attaining a unlace aad unifying design far Foothill Boulevard. S4ff INalysts: Staff believes this concept has great potential for providing Identity to the Rancho Cucamonga portion of Foothfll Boulevard. Me visualize an interesting experience of mtering the City through high visibility gateways and Deing led by stretches of Informal parkways to high interest commercial craters which exhibit an urban nsAaof~i an ah~n<nb.~ B.1 OVERALL CpMMITf DESIGN CDNCEPT (Sacttan 7.5) This section contains specific design guidelines which implement the ob~ectlves of the activity center/suburban parkway concept. The components of this section as noted on Pages 7-5 through 7-B contain the following components: o Subarea Structure o pctivlty Curter o Suburban Parkway o Overall Archttettural Concept o Overall Landscape Mch/teCtural Concept Issue: The Planning Co~lsslon should deter•tne the apprapriate~ess of these design components within the overall design concept for the corridor. s~9 B.2 ARCNITECTUtAL ISSUES One of the more recognizable aspects of a community design image is that of Its architectural style. The Advisory Comwi ilea de116erateA extensively on what architectural style should be encouraged as an aspect of cpmmminlty identity. The Tmpartance of this issue is ezempllfied by the plans Overall Statement: '6oa1: To create a Qynamic concourse that is attractive and of high quality with a unifying design linage, reflective of community heritage and identity....' Otseusslm: Concern was voiced early on that the canmmunity does not have a single ldentiflable architectural theme, but exhibits a diversity of styles which were identified as winery, mission, California barn, 1930's Route 66, agricultural heritage, etc. The Camwlttee resolved not to limit architecture to a single theme or style. Rather, it was decided that architecture should barrow certain elements from historical styles found in Rancho Cucamonga. This view resuited 1n an architectural concept (Rancho Cucamonga Heritage) wh1cA: 1. Encourages the use of elements from these types along the Corridor with provisions for design compatibility. 2. The use of a single style of architectural el anent is not a part of this plan. 3. Encouragement of design themes on a site-by-site basis is encouraged and provided for at activity centers and key features (Section 8.2 - 8.41. issue: W11 an architectural progra ~mde up of different distinct styles be able to fan a unifying design concept for the Corrldor7 SLff AnmlySls: Staff believes the gdvlsory Commaittee's recommendation has definite potential within the overall design framework so long as distinct architectural styles/themes are implemKnted at each activity center. In this manner, compatible architectural diversity tan act as a unifying element in Lhe suburban parkway streetscape while maintaining distinct architectural styles at key activity nodes/centers. ~~ As an alternative, the Planning Caw•ission ray wish Lo consider narrowing the band of architectural styles to be designated almg the entire length of the boulevard. OESI6M NIIDELIIES/SIAI~ANDS These standards contain the irplenentation features for the ob,~ectives of the special design areas. Issue: the plaiw/rg ca~issim shoul4 revld all of the grldaltras to daterl•la! /f the desired design abiactlves can he achieved. Ssl LAID usE• A. OYERALI LAID 1RE/ECOYOIQC 51RIlTE6- The Land Use goal is to 'develop a specific plan which is sensitive to community, land use, and physical needs' As a aw,lor component of this statement, the Advisory Cea~ittee set the tone for the land use/economic planning along Foothill through the following ob~ectfves: 'Maximize the economic posltiom of Foothill Corridor commercial activities, capturing neighborhood and subreglonal demand." This oblectlve strongly influences the ultimate scope of cca~erclal activity and character of the corridor and the following discussion focuses om potential result of such an aggressive commercial venture. Dlsomssiom: As part of the fact finding portion of the Plan study, an ecomomic analysis was performed by the consulting team. The results of the economic consultants' study arc as follows; o Tho rHv ~~ .~,. .._ •%w°• •.~..ny iVii UI ~tlICS wx revenue by "sales potential leakage' in excess of 5200 milllar, annually to other communities due to lack of significant high sales volume businesses. o Mithin the planning area, only a little more than half of the commercial land is currently being used by retail, service, and office businesses. The dominant use for all land use categories along the Corridor is vacant 1anA (277 acres). o Based on projected population at buildout and 1,334 acres of General Plan commercially designated Land, the City has an unrealistically high allocation of commercial land for future needs when compared to "comparable cities°. o Residential development along and adJacent to the corridor would help to improve caagerctal viability along the boulevard. j5 ~ The sales leakage is not the result of the lack of commercially zoned land; commercial growth normally lags behind residential development in ail growing areas. As new commercial uses develop along with new shopping patterns, new cities begin to capture a greater proportion of the sales. However, overly anbitlous commercial zoning can have a negative impact on the many vacant and currently underutilized parcels along the western portion of Foothill. The Advisory Committee did rat feel that additional commercial land would result in any negative impacts tf other provisions and implementation programs of the Plan aggressively promoted commercial activity. As a result, the plan calls for significant additional commercial acreage along the corridor, with the intent of capturing a portion of the regional traffic. Conversely, the number of acres available for residential growth would be reduced. The statistical land use breakdown is as follows: Present Draft General Plan Specific Plan Difference Camaercial/Office 262 369 acres + 107 acres Residential 226 157 acres - 69 acres industrial Park 63 0 acres - 63 acres Other 7 32 acres + 25 acres Issue: Should the ce~ercial/office acreage along the corridor be increased from 262 acres to approximmtely 369 acres. Staff Analysts: The key Lo a successful land use plan is balance. Me concur with the Canwlttees' recanmrendation in that Foothill Boulevard does have a tremendous camrerclal potential with regional commercial opportunities. Th1t is true particularly in the eastern portion of the City, where large parcels of land are available for regional comererciat use, with easy access and visibility from the I-16 freeway, relationship to the regional mall, and a main gateway to the western portion of Fontana. However, staff has same concerns with the western portion of the corridor. If excessive amounts of cdmmmrctal acreage are available, significant commercial areas may remain undeveloped. Th15 could have a negative effect on the viability and desirability of the area for quality commercial services and would limit the potential for the upgrading or reconstruction of existing non-conforming structures or uses. 553 On the other hand, the Casission should De aware that the oniy viable alternative to ca~erctal or office uses along the corridor is residential land use. The corridor will not be an environcent conducive to single-fawtily residential uses, and natltiple-faeily pro~etts create traffic, coepatibillty, and other problees of their own. Staff would suggest the Coa~isslon review the overall land use concept with these concerns in aind, recognizing that there any not De a clear cut, ideal solution available for each parcel of land in the study area. B.1 LAID USE CATE60RIE5: In an effort to tailor the plan to unique opportunities and constrains of selected areas, special land use designations were developed. The following discussion describes and analyzes each case. 1. Regionally Related Co>•ercial fRCt This category is located lawediately ad,acent to the east side of the I-15 Freeway and was proposed to take advantage of the land's freeway exposure and close proxielty to the future mall. Dlsatssian: The gain issues in this land use category are as foilows: Mhat aeount of land area should be reserved for this activlty7 On the south side of Foothill, the zone extends to Etiwanda Avenue. The extent of coaalercial activity allowed within this category was extensively discussed. Save concern was voiced that only regional related coneierctal uses which would not coapete for space or business with the future call should be allowed. The alternative view which was recaasw!nded 1s that there should be little or no restriction to eaapetltion with the Ball for space or business. 5S~ Issue: Sbould Sbe regionally related ce~erclal zone allow for businesses which rill not only compleaw.nt but mqy also c rlth the busixss lypes anticipated for the future ~l l? Stiff Aimlysls: Staff believes the level of City comwltment to the mall and its ingortance to the comaunity's plan warrants sane consideration to limit the uses Tn the immediak area so as not to compete but complement the Hall business activities. 2. Spec/alty Ca~erclal (SC) This designation was incorporated into the Plan to facilltak the specialized development of landmark and activity centers of the Corridor. The location of this designation is at the intersections and entries k the City as follows: Grove Avenue k the Bear Gulch Area Vineyard Avenue Intersection (northeast l:U(OCr j Archibald Intersection Dlstusslan: The land use and development provisions of this zone provides for special standards to encourage the redevelopment and rekntton of ezisting features unique to the bouievard. Towards this goal, the allowed activities have been tailored to those business types which would lend support to the establishment of theme oriented activity centers. A sample of authorized uses include: Mtlque shops, bed and breakfast, book, gift and stationery stores, cafes, jewelry, luggage shops, art galleries, travel agencies. Activities which may rwt lend themselves to this special character development are not authorized and lnciude: Supermarkets, nurseries, garden supplies, television and stereo sales, hardware skres, auto service, laundries. In this matter, the restricted activities heip to keep the development character within the intended specialized design of the high interest area. 555 Issue: DaK the special coaaarcial designation provide wffiNent activity allowana:s and ~ppMate ~lkadtattms to ensure specialized ey poi Ms Of interest and landwrkzT staff Analysis: Staff concurs with the use lid Lotions t0 help ensure developaKnts of unique character. Uses which do not lend theaKelves to this specialized character should locate in the caaaunity caaaw:rcial or other districts. 3. Nlzed Use/Retatl (MU/R) The large block bordered by Nellawn Avenue, San Bernardino Road, Klusawn Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard presented a nuaber of potential difficulties as follows: o Many sawtll substandard lots in fragaented ownership Cvn N.. ALMA .t - w~ w 1. ul MIi VI Wn W JGII Bernardino Road o A desire to ltait the number of vehicle access paints to Foothill Boulevard o Residents to the north requesting )tatted access fray Foothill developaK•nts onto San Bernardino Road o Variety of residential (aoblle home parks) and transition cowaerctal uses within the block. The consultant and Advisory Coawittee recoaaoendation was to provide a land use category whfch: a. Ali ow for aulttple fawtlly developoents fra~a 8 to 14 dwelling units per acre, and; b. Coupled with an establishment of convenience uses aM services tailored to the residential needs, and; s s~ c. Keyed to a mixed use concept is the requirement of a master plan for the entire MU(R area which would accaHHOdate reHedies to circulation concerns. This land use designation is also proposed for a similarly sized area at the northeast corner of Faothlil and EtTwanda Avenue. tssue: Can a caaaerclal/resideMtal fixed use stenaHO 6e planned and developed successfully under a caster plan oonteptl If so, mAnt specific uses could be appropriate rlthln Mis land use categoryt Note: The Advisory Cowlttee heard a request from a property owner to include Hotel uses as an authorized activity In the category. The Caamittee felt there could be conflicts between the residential activity of multiple family uses and the more transient boarding activities of Hotels. Surr nnaiysis: ine Hixeo use designation presents both potential to innovative solutions but can also resu12 in incoHpat1b111t1es if not adequately planned. Staff concurs with the Advisory Comwittee recamaendation that Raster planning of the entire area so designated is a Host if the varying uses are to work well together. 8.2 SITE SPECIFIC ISSIES: Issue: Should awtaHOtlve related uses be el tadnated along the Corrldorl The proposed plan perHits automotive related uses in portions of the area. However, concerns were voiced that autaHODile services Hay not be appropriate along a revitalized Foothill Boulevard and that such uses should be located Tn the Industrial Area. Issue: Should the ca~unlty taanerclal extend northerly an addltlanal 308 feet along the northwest corner of Foothill and Etlrandat staff has concerns on the approp lateness of extending cowHercial activity northerly into the predominantly residential Etlwanda Specific Plan. 55~ Issue: Should the south slde of Foothill Boulevard opposite the $ycnore Im 6e included 1n the SpeefaltY tw~ercial Mstridt Staff has concerns on the vtab111ty of such a large area designated solely for Specialty Caweerclal uses. Staff rill need the ComTSSlon's direction in these areas. C. DEIIEL011EIII STAI~IWDS The Planning CaasHssion should revter the peruitted uses in Part III of the Developuent Standards for all laM use categories. 55~ B. SELECTED CIRCUL11TIpl ISSUES Red Hill Caoatry Clrb reap t: The aiignment of Red Hill Coun ry u r ve was s u e n relation to: 1. Its awkward Tntersectlon with Foothill Boulevard and inadequate distance to Grove Avenue causing safety and circulation probieau at both intersections. 2. Its inappropriate use as a shortcut to Base Line Road, thereby increasing traffic through the residential neighborhood on Red Hill. The Caesittee considered the following alternatives (p. 6-1): 1. Alternative 1 calls for realignment southerly to a 90 degree 'T" intersection, easterly of the present location. 2. Alternative 2 calls for the road to be realigned westerly to Grove Avenue with two possible routes. Route 2 B was recommended to divide the effected parr.~1 torn t... n.yei,.~.~1........ .~..... Issue: The Plaeeiny Ca~lsslon should consider Uu appreprtateness of the reco•mded align~ent versus the other alternatives. Staff Analysis: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Committee. Extensfon of Estacta Avenue; Residents on the north side of n roar no oa n Hellman Avenue and Klusman Avenue expressed concern over potential excessive traffic generated by future development on the south side of San Bernardino Road. This concern resulted to a request to prohibit any access points from this area onto San Bernardino Road. The Advisory Ceawittee generally concurred wtth their concerns and recommends against any significant access northerly to this street. In order to provide sufficient access Into this Large block, the following measures were included in the Plan: 1. Extension of Estacia Avenue westerly into the area. S59 clacu.Anor- A. OVERALL TRAFFIC SVSIEII A major concern to which the Plan must provide solutions is that of future traffic congestion. The traffic analysis as part of the background report predicted average daily traffic counts of up to 86,000 without the Route 30 Freeway. Math the new freeway, assumed 1n all our plans, the valuaw!s of traffic on Foothill would decrease to 50,000 - 60,000 ADT's but projected levels of service will still remain unsatisfactory. The proposed traffic control system 15 discussed belows: Discussion: The overall traffic systa utilizes synchronized traffic signallzatton and the following: 1. Continuous median islands with cuts united to major intersections, and specified locations only. 2, Selected access points on Foothill Boulevard based on existing City policy for driveway locatiens. 3. Multiple left-turn lanes and separate right-turn lanes at critical intersections. Even with these measures, the traffic consultant predicts poor levels of service at major intersections. Mhtle this problem has been expected without a specific plan study, it 1s also recognized that the increase 1n the amount of cawaerclal land wilt add incrementally to the overall traffic volumes. Issue: Are tAe traffic control measures appropriate to enwrc a safe clreulatlan systs rMle pr'owlding adequate access far the viaDi111y of cemmerctai dnalopmentsT Staff Analysis: The importance of adequate control measures and timely tmplementatlon cannot be overemphasized. It should be recognized that the corridor is an integral part of the City-wide and regional circulation system and that all traffic control measures must work in concert with one another. The desire to provide additional median openings or points of access to localized areas must be weighed against the Boulevard's ability Lo carry the projected volumes of Lraffic as a crucial component of an overall system: ~~ 2. The locatton of two ngjor access points opposite Malachite and Helps northerly into the block. The Malachite access extension would De m appropriate location for a signalized intersection. 3. M interior circulation systda of public or private drives linking the extmsim of Estacia with the access points off Foothill Boulevard. Issues: 1. Should access be prohibited a severely 1ladted to son Bernardino Road? 2. If so, should access to the area be as proposed? Staff Analysis: Staff retogn/zes the valid concerns of the neighboring residents but oust point out that San Bernardino Road has been panned as a collector roadway to service the properties on both skies of 1t. Therefore, save conslderatim should De glum to allow liaited access to this street. If not, alternate access oust be provided. Staff believes that the scenario provided 15 the only logical alternative to the u5c ui ann o!I'na r4lnu NOad. San Bernardiro Road Reap t: The Plan calls for the a us n o n roar no oad intersectim opposite the Sycanore Inn by closing off the easterly extension of the 'Y' intersection. Stall Analysis: Staff concurs with the recawendatlms of the Advisory Coa~ittee and reCOaaw!nds approval by the Planning Cas~isston. San Dla9o Avenue Raaltgn•ent: The Advisory Caawittee consiaered reQues s ran looping Co~issian and City Launch regarding potential realignaent of San Diego Avenue. The options considered include: 1. Hove the roadway westerly to border the reallgnnent of the Cucaaonga Creek Channel, or; 2. Abandon the roadway, or; 3. Leave the street as presently configured with no cut in the proposed aedlan island on Foothill. S~~ The Advisory Conalttee felt there was no evidence to ,lustify the first two options. SGff Aaalysis: The retention of San D1ego Avenue 1n its present allgnaient is acceptable, with rro nedian openings, until further develop~ent of the area. C. The Planning CoeaHssion should review and recaw•end approval of final roadway configurations throughout the corridor. Spa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April B, 1987 TU: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Krouti 1, Senior Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner c~~"Mo ~ ~v ~' n "> 1967 SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY: A presentation of ra spec c pan or oothill Boulevard Corridor with a brief description of the plan formulation process and its general policy direction. The purpose of this presentation is to introduce the Planning Commission to the status of the pro,{ect and to establish further review format and public hearing schedule. I. ABSTRACT: This report outlines the process for the development of a ra specific plan for the Foothill Corridor. Noted are Che main caaponents of the document and significant policy issues. Tre purpose of this item is to familiarize the Planning Caawission with the overall scope of the plan and to set a date for its Du Dl 1c ti~ II. BACKGROUND: As the Planning Commission is aware, the City in mid I98S~gan an extensive study to evaluate the development potential of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Tne ultimate goal of this plan is to provide a balanced and unified plan of development along Foothill Boulevard by Wkiny advantage of opportunities in future community growth to result to the best posslole development. Also, to this end the City established the Interim Policies, to protect the integrity of the ultimate Specific Plan and to allow the time necessary to formulate the Specific Plan for the corridor. The study was initiated by the selection of a study consultant Forma/planning Network and the formation of a study group which included the consultants, planning staff and a Council a¢¢ointed Ad•ri,ory Calmnittee iE~cMbit "i"i. [[I. PROCESS: The study began in .tune of 1986 with a series of four ne g or ocd meetings which were scheduled solely to receive input from citizens regarding the potentials and prob' m within the corridor area. The information gathered resulted in a background report which set the basis for the initial consultant recommendations for the Specific Plan. ~~3 ITEM U PLANNING COMA SSI~ STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BLYD. SPE~iFIC PLAN STUDY Apr11 8, 1981 Page 2 In July, 1986 the Advisory Caawlttee began a series of working meetings to review the result of Lhe background studies and consultant recoaaaenddtions for the draft Dlan. The public was invited to these aKetings and opportunities were autde available for additional public coawenL. Oaring a ten aanth period, ending on March 27, 1987, the Committee advised Che staff and the consultant on plan proposals and their direction is reflected in the draft docu~aent. The draft docuaxmt you will be reviewing contains cost all of the initial consultant proposals with alternate Coawittee recoaaaendattons noted in the script. This forawt will enable the Planning Casission to follow the process the draft plan went through to result in the recommended text. The next step is for the 'baton to be passed' to the Planning Cow.ission for fonwl public hearings. UitiaWttely, the Ca~ission recoaasendations on the proposed plan will be sudaitted to the City Council for adoption. The envlronnental review process began in February with the nwiling of a notice of preparation to interested agencies. The consultant anticipates the draft and Envlronaw:ntal Iagact Report will be cawpleted in April. IY. DitAFT PLAN OVERYIEN: The plan's Develop~ent Standards have evolved raa ree s gn wnt polity recaawendattons by the Advisory Coa~ittee. These key oolicv areas are• rig r,....,..., .,. n__, __ lXi Land Use and Econaalc Y1aDility, and (31~ Traffics and Circulation. The eaghasis within each category is as follows: 1. Coawunity DesT n: The Committee expressed a strong es re crea e a distinct and high quality coaaaunity identity for the Corridor. This is topleax'nted in detailed Oevelopaxnt Standards and stated in the Cawunity Oesign Goal: "Create a coaxunity design tautge that expresses and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cucaannga." Towards this end there are p,-ovistons for the following: a. Special gateway eleaw:nts at entrances to the City. b. Recognition of key extsting cane~unity features which are used in the Plan to establish architectural "character determinants' for special areas. c. Establishing individual design standards for key intersections within the Corridor. 4. Providing suggested materials palette Lo encourage architecture designs which will be compatible with a range of historical styles within the Community, !J~/ PLANNING COMMISSIf STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BLYD. SPE~iFIC PLAN STUDY April 8, 19W Page 3 Land Use and Econo~ic Viability: The Caaoittee is p ac ng s rong ass on ncreasi ny the coa~erci al viability of Foothill Boulevard as a regional attraction, To pro~ote this goal, additional ca~erct al and related activities have been planned for by increasing the cow.ercially zoned land within the Corridor. Further towards tM s end, a special use designation, Regional Related Caaaaercial, has been Included in the Etiwanda area to caaWlenent the Regional Nall and take advantage of the I-15 Freeway exposure. Special Coaaaercial districts have been included to provide special standards to encourage uses which will work well with unique developaw:nt goals of key coa~unitY features, i.e. Thous Brothers Vinery. 3. Traffic and Circulation: Finally, the Caw•ittee recogn ze nee or developaw:nt of an integrated traffic control systda. The Plan calls for median islands along the entire length of the Boulevard, identifies buttons of nedian breaks and signals and ia>pleawnKs an access policy for ^id block locations. These provisions are to help "develop a circulation systes which facilitates the efficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic and enhances the Coaaaunity Design character along Foothill Boulevard.' The plan consultant, Foraw, will present a general sua~ary of the significant issues which surfaced during the Coa~ittee's deliberation and influenced the plan's direction. A significant area of Conaittee concern was the inability to include the sec*_ton of FootMll Boulevard between Deer Creek and Lhe (-15 Freeway in the plan Drovlslons. The Coa~ittee requested that a recaanendation to include the '~lssing' section be sent to the City Council. Finally, on April 1, 1987 the City Council received a cdDY of the draft plan and reviewed the progress of the project. Nhtle not coirienting on any specific policy direction, the following suggestions were Dresented: 1. The plan should be easy to read, clear as to whet Should be accanpllshed and its forxwt should 'sell" the ideas contained 1n it to the reader. 2. Traffic 1s a serious concern and the plan should include as awrch as possible to deal with the probleau and not stop short of adequate solutions. ~~s~ PLIINNIN6 COMNISSIC iTAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BLVD. SPE~.FIC PLAN STUDY April 8, 1981 Page 4 3. The Planning Coawrission has the City Council's support and encouragnaent to develop the best posslbie plan for Foothill Boulevard. RECOMRENDATION: !t is recaaww:nded the Planning Canisston set a pu-6TTcTiearTg-for consideration of the Foothill Boulevard Specitlc Pian at a special oeeting on April 30, 1987, or other appropriate date. Addt ti onal iy, staff would 1 i ke to thank the Advisory Casi ttee for its valuable input in the process and bring the diligent efforts of each awaaber to the attention of the Planning Cdawtssion. Mewtbers of the Advisory Coa~ittee have been Invited to tMs av!ettng and sy wish to briefly address the Coanission. R ectf 11 u iyyed, Brad Buller City Planner BB: qC: AM: sgr ACtacMaents: Exhibit 1 - Foothill Boulevard AdvlSOry Cowwittee Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan - Under Separate rover J ~ Exhibit 1 ADVISDAY CDMMITTBE May 1986 - March 1957 Suzanne CAitlea LSnda Eddy John Solt Tom 1COb1 Gary Mitchell Peul Saldana Jetf Scsranka Deborah Brovn• Lynne ltraus* • Participated in 1986 L ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting April 30, 1981 Vice-Chairman Suzanne Chitiea called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. She then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Bruce Emerick, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: Larry McNiel STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Ba rrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; Rai ph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner; Janice Reynolds, Planning Commission Secretary; Alan Marren, Associate Planner Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, gave an overview of the the Foothill Specific Plan process. Van Stevens, Forma, the pion consultant, gave an overview of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Mr. Stevens then presented the Design Concept, land Use/Economic Concept, and Overall Traffic System sections of the Plan. Vice-Chairman Chitiea opened the public hearing. Gary Mitchell, 9330 Base line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, member of the foothill Specific Plan Ad Hoc Committee, gave an overview of the Committee process. On behalf of the Chamber of Commerce, he relayed a concern expressed by small and medium business people of how the plan may affect their businesses and business opportunities. He felt that the iniplementa tion policies were critical to the overall success of the land uses for future development. detf 5rera~ka, member of the Foothill Specific Plan Ad Hoc Committee, stated that he saw an opportunity with this plan to capture the taz dollars that are currently being spent in other communities. He indicated that the land use in the area of the Oevo re Freeway was of particular concern because Foothill 3ouleva rd and the Oevore Freeway is a major intersection with a regional shopping center proposed on the northwest corner. He fe' : that this plan ~jl~ ~ provides the potential for additional semi-regional uses that are consistent with almost every major shopping center in Southern California. He felt that it was important that not all of the commercial uses be given to the regional shopping center. He stated that one of his objectives was to see that the City balance commercial uses along Foothill from the west boundary to the regional shopping center an the east. Tim Beedle, Reiter Development, expressed the need to be able to articulate particular types of uses throughout the ca rridor with an emphasis toward both design and economic vitality. Joe Ya ncy, 12752 Foothill, Rancho Cucamonga, expressed concerns with medians and median breaks along Foothill, tax increases to pay for these median breaks, and a concern that there will be adequate support for commercial centers, There were no further public comments on this section of the Dresentation. Commissioner Emerick commented on the Carri dor Design Concept and disagreed with the consultant's recommendation of a formalized treatment of the Sycamore Inn and Bear Gulch areas. Additionally, he was concerned with traffic and agreed that the functional portion of the traffic issue must be dealt with first. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the gateway design elements are an important feature of the Plan. He supported the activity centers and stated they give special treatment to special boulevards. Regarding the Overall Land Use/Economic Ca ncept section of the plan, he commented that the regional related activities from I-15 to the eastern border are important. He questioned the possibility of having more commercial than is viable. Traffic was of concern and he felt it was a major issue to be dealt with. Vice-Chairman Chitiea stated the overall design concept is a very strong one. She supported the use of activity centers and felt the gateways are essential. She agreed that traffic was of tremendous importance and commented that the median breaks would be designed with traffic circulation being the major consideration. She had concern with the slightly excessive commercial use and felt the Lity must be careful not to dilute the market. She stated that the regionally related uses in the eastern portion of the City would enhance the regional center as it develops. The Planning Commission recessed at 8:25 p.m, and the meeting resumed at 8:45 p.m. Mr. S*_evees gave an overview of the .and Use Categories. Vice-Chairman Chitiea opened the public hearing. Sanford Bloom, property owner on Foothill between Klusman and Hellman, opposed the Mixed Use/Retail designation proposed for that property Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 70, 1981 S~4 ~' Pete Pitassi, architect, advised that he was currently developing a consolidated master plan for this site. Hr. Pitassi presented the master plan to the Commission. Tim Beedle, representing Reiter Development, suggested that the uses within the Regional Related designation should be expanded to include ancillary commercial uses. Jeff Sceranka advised that the Ad Hoc Committee had discussed the issue of allowing various commercial uses within the RC category. His recommendation was that the RC designation be the most broad based commercial designation and that the uses be expanded to include community commercial uses with a requirement for master planning and the identification of the anchor tenant. Gary Mitchell addressed the concern expressed by the Commissioners relative to the extent of commercial uses. He stated that after the Committee reviewed the economic background studies provided by the consultant team they determined that the traffic volumes on Foothill Boulevard would provide more of a unique opportunity to capture commercial opportunities along the boulevard. He pointed out that Rancho Cucamonga ranks among the highest earning per capita communities in the County of San Bernardino; however, ranks among the lowest in capturing retail sales dollars spent within the community. Bert Francis, property owner in the Bear Gulch area, expressed a concern with the number of uses which are not allowed on his piece of property, particularly uses such as credit unions and ancillary medical offices, Ben Mackall, 8112 Foothill, asked that optometrical uses be allowed within the CC designation. There were no further public comments. Commissioner Emerick agreed that Lhe uses within the Regional Related category are not broad enough. He agreed with limiting the uses within Specialty Commercial so they could 61end in with the Red Hfll and Thomas winery areas. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that staff should take a look at the Regional Related uses and determine a way to state in the text that these pieces of land are held only for centers that can be developed around large regional commercial uses. Vice-Chairman Chitiea agreed that the base for Regional Related uses should be broadened, She supported the concept of master planning with the possibility of a requirement that at least one anchor store must be developed with phase one of every master plan, She additionally suggested that criteria 6e established relative to parcel size to assure that a large enough parcel of land will 6e developed. Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 30, 1987 ~d Mr. Stevens advised that the development regulations and design guidelines for Regional Related uses specifically create incentives and direction for future land uses to be of the major regional type. He also pointed out that the minimum parcel size would be five acres. Mr. Kro util asked for comments relative to the Mixed Use concept. Lommis Sion er Emerick supported the concept and felt that the flexibility that the designation affords the property owner was appropriate. Vice-Chairman Chitiea agreed and further stated that the flexibiiity might encourage the most exciting use of the land. Commissioner Tolstoy felt that MTxed Use would encourage property owners to join together and master plan, which was the intent of the Plan. Red Hill Country Club Realignment John Atwater, Associate Planner representing the City of Upland, expressed concern with possible traffic and noise impacts on Grove Avenue and the residential streets in the Li ty of Upland. He felt that other alternatives should be provided far consideration. Thomas McGalloway, Planning Commissioner with the City of Upland, expressed concern and opposition to Alternative 2-B of the Plan which diverted the Red Hill Country Club Drive westerly traffic onto Grove Avenue north of Foothill. He was concerned that this additional traffic would impact the ingress and egress to the shopping center on the na rthwest corner of Foothill and Grove. He advised that the Upland traffic engineer suggested a realignment point between the Sycamore Inn orooerty to align with Can 8 erne rdino Road. - Russ Maguire, City Engineer, advised that the northerly exit out of the Red Hill area at Alta Lues to is currently under contract to 6e signalized. Further, the combination Vineyard/Carnelian and Country Club Drive intersection is being budgeted for signalize Lion during the upcoming fiscal year. He pointed out that alternative access was being provided to draw the traffic away from Red Hill. Mr. Maguire commented that a realignment near the Sycamore Inn was previously considered; however, the grade differential to bring the street down to that point virtually destroys the area. Edward Hopson, 1131 w, 6th Street, Ontario, representing the property owner of 18 acres surrounding the Sycamore Inn, stated opposition to the realignment of Red Hi11 Country Club Drive with San Bernardino Road due to the adverse impact It would have on this property, John Halt advised that other alternatives were discussed 6y the Ad Hoc Committee, however, Alternative 2-8 was chosen due to safety concerns and because it, least impacted the residential streets. Planning Commission Minutes -A- April 30, 1981 ~~ There were no further public comments. It was the consensus of the Commission that the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive be continued to the next meeting. Staff was directed to provide a recommendation relative to the traffic study prepared for the property owner at the northeast corner of Grove and Foothill. Extension of Estacia Avenue Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of the Plan proposal. Harold Lovg ren, expressed concern with limiting access on Estacia to San Bernardino Road. John Holt stated that the Advisory Committee came up with an acceptable solution that would mean that access to San Bernardino would be acceptable if that access did not provide through traffic to Foothill Boulevard. Pete Pi tarsi stated that if there is a connection on Klusman the logical location would be adjacent to Estacia to form an intersection. He was concerned that in order to get proper aligmaent, radius and right-of-ways to allow that alignment, the location of the commercial building behind Wendy's would create hazardous traffic situation since there isn't enough depth from that commercial building to Klusman. He felt San Bernardino Road was designed as a collector street and should be allowed to function in that capacity. He asked that he be given flexibility on the connection street as part of his master plan concept. Mr. Stevens pointed out that the arrows designated on the plan are strictly opportunities for access; there are no mandatory statements of circulation. Warren Hillgren, owner of the mobile home park at 9340 Foothill Boulevard, felt there were potential legal and economic problems with the Mized Use Residential designation. He stated that further traffic analysis and study should be conducted on both San Bernardino Road and Estacia. Don Castie, representing Vineyard Bank, stated concern with the possible alignment of the Estacia Court extension. He additionally stated a concern with the lack of a median in Foothill Boulevard at Klusman. Jeff Sceranka stated that the intent of the Committee was to minimize commercial traffic on San Bernardino Road. He felt that a residential project would create less traffic impacts than a commercial project and would least affect the existing residences. There were no further public comments. Planning Commission Minutes -5- April 30, 1987 S' ~ ~ Commissioner Emerick stated that the access opportunities indicated on the map are appropriate. He felt that access onto San Bernardino Road should be limited as much as possible. He concurred with no through access all the way through San Bernardino Road to Foothill and little or no commercf al access from San Berna rdf no Road into a commercial project. Vice-Chairman Chi ti ea concurred and stated the Commission will look closely at the proposals and the alternatives and will be sensitive to the concerns of all citizens. San Bernardino Road and Foo thiii Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of the Plan proposal. Vice-Chairman Chi Li ea opened the public hearing. Bert Francis supported the recommendation of the Advisory Committee. There were no further public comments. It was the consensus of the Commission to support the Plan proposal relative to San Bernardino Road and Foothill. San Di eqo Avenue Realignment Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of the Plan proposal. Gary Mitchell stated that the Advisory Committee was also concerned with the property west of the flood control channel. He indicated the Committee's recorunendalion would be to Master Plan both parcels. Steve Lucas, 9489 Apricot, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the access to San Diego as it currently exists would be the acceptable solution. There were no further public comments. Commissioner Emerick stated that San Diego Road should be indicated as a dashed line to keep the pos si611 ities open. For master plan purposes he felt the street should be indicated, however, the text should state the entire corner should be master planned. Vice-Chairman Chi ti ea suggested that direction be given that the City would 6e flexible in this matter based on master plan. Mr. Kroutil pointed ou*_ that the question would 6e if the Ua ter District romes in with a developnent plan independent of the remainder of the site would they be able to develop at this point, or would they he subject to an overall master plan. Planning Commission Minutes -6- April 30, 1987 Sl 73 Commissioner Tolstoy stated the ideal solution would be to master plan the entire corner and abandon access on San Diego. Mr. Kroutil pointed out that you would not 6e able to develop that portion unless alternate access is provided elsewhere. Mr. Buller stated that if a proposal came in there could be a mechanism that if San Diego were vacated on an interim basis it could remain there until such time as the rest of the master plan is developed. If the Mater District's property were purchased by a private venture, the City could allow an access point into that project as long as it was not a through street. He indicated that the City would place the burden on the developer to show that their project can fit into a master plan for the rest of the site. Commissioner Emerick reiterated that the access is being shown now as existing right of way; however, the City would be amenable to having it master planned. Conclusion Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of the Commission's actions during this meeting. Commissioner Chiti ea added that she felt very strongly that the intersection of Haven and Foothill is extremely important and should be included in the scope of this study. She advised that the Committee felt strongly about incorporating that intersection into the overall picture. She felt that Haven should relate to what is happening on foothill and the last two corners should not be allowed to develop piecemeal. She asked that this area be included. Mr. Buller stated that if this was a direction of the Commission, staff would suggest cnac action proceed on this plan as it currently exists. He advised that this area could be included as an addendum to the plan; however, the contract with the consultant would need to 6e amended and the City Council would need to support that amendment. Yice-Chairman Chi tiea invited public comment. Gary Mitchell stated that there are two issues to be dealt with: the issue of designating that intersection as a strategic and special intersection; and, the issue of the land use between the Channel on the west side of Virginia Dare all the way to the east side of the Devore Freeway. He suggested that the Commission consider separa ling the issues of the land use of that missing link, but add a designation on the Plan signifyfng the intersection of Foothill and Haven as a special intersection where the City would want similar kinds of treatment along the lines of the special boulevard. Planning Commission Minutes -7• April 30, 1987 S 7 Commissioner Tolstoy pointed out that the General Plan designates Haven and Foothill a special boulevard. He agreed with Mr. Buller that it would not be necessary to stop action on the Plan at this point to include this section, but that Tt be done as an amendment to the Plan. Jeff Sceranka concurred with Mr. Bu11er's suggestion and further stated that it was critical that the Terra Vista Plan, Barton Development Plan, and Santa Fe Realty Plan all be coordinated with the Foothill Plan. There were no further public cmmwents. Vice-Chairman Chi ti ea concurred that the Commission not hold up this process, but she suggested that Lhe recommendations be made to the Council immediately so that the design elements can be incorporated. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the Commission really should recognize the fact that there is a problem with this missing link of Foothill and recommend to the Council that the entire length of Foothill be included in the Plan area. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Emerick, unanimously tarried, to adjourn the public hearing for the Foothill Boulevard Spettfic Plan to Monday, May 18, 1987, 7:30 p.m., Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted, o,au ouiier' Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -8- April 30, 1987 S/ 7,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting May 18, 1987 Chairman Larry McNiel called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:35 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman McNi el then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Blakesley, Suzanne Chitiea, Bruce Emerick, Larry McNi el, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Dlanner; Ba rrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Russ Maguire, City Engineer; Otto Krautil, Senior Planner; Janice Reynolds, Planning Commission Secretary; Alan Warren, Associate Planner _fT C;:T InGrii1E;:TAL iri'rACT REvORI lt1Nj Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, gave an overview of the draft Environmental Impact Report and announced that staff would be taking public comments on the draft document until June 24, 1981. Chairman McNiel opened the hearing for comments an the draft Environmental Impact Report. Kay Matlock, representing Lewis Homes, stated a concern with the increase in commercial acreage, particularly the additional Regional Related and Community Commercial which could have an adverse affect on the community commercial center at Foothill and Haven. She asked that this issue be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report. Mr. Kruutii stated that if too much commercial is a concern of the Commission, that should be addressed in the Plan itself; the Environmental Impact Report would merely point out the fact. %J' 7~ Commissioner Emerick stated that he would like to see additional staff study on the Alta Loma and Cucamonga School Oist ricts's comments relative to commercial development generating more impacts on school services than residential development. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of the Plan process to date. Van Stevens of Forma, the consultant for the Plan, gave an overview of the design concepts of the Plan. Mark Broeder, Urban Designer representing Forma, gave an overview of the Community Design Concept and presented slides for the Commission's consideration. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing on the Community Design and Architectural issues. Tim Beedle, Reiter Development, supported flexibility of design, but felt the Commission should be cautious with extreme use of design. He supported ambient lighting along the corridor that would 6e in character with the intent and theme of Foothill Boulevard. He stated that Clear guidelines should be established far sign requirements. He additionally stated that flexibility should be given for landscape setbacks to allow setbacks up to 25 feet. Gil Rodriguez stated concerns with the amount of landscaping setback required and with the concept of locating parking areas behind buildings facing Foothill. Mr. Rodriguez felt that excE ptions for these requirements should be allowed for major anchor tenants. There were no further public comments on this section of the Plan. Commissioner Chi ti ea commented on Mr. Beedl e's suggestion of allowing setbacks up to 25 feet throughout the corridor and stated that that would df minish the concept of the urban centers. Regarding ambient lighting, she felt this would be appropriate in the bounds of safety and felt that light standards at a lower lighting scale might be possible. She concurred that there should be clear guidelines on signs ge and they should be attractive and consistent throughout Foothill. Relative to Mr. Rodriguez's suggestion to allow exceptions for major anchor tenants, she stated that the Plan was developed so that the City would 6e consistent and the same requirements would apply to all developments. If exceptions were allowed for every major tenant, there would be no plan. Commissioner Emerick rest that the tent language which requires formal landscaping in the Sycamore Inn area should be modified. He advocated informal planting of more Sycamore trees in Chis area. He concurred with Commissioner Chitiea's comments relative to the 25 foot setback area and liked the plan concept of having a treatment with fountain and peC st rian treatments Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 18, 1987 5~~ at the intersections. He concurred with the use of a lighting system that would be softer and consistent throughout the corridor, Commissioner Tolstoy stated it is important that there are relationships between architectural features within activity centers. Chairman McNi e1 stated he was a little concern with the identification of the Thomas Winery and Bear Gulch areas as a concept. He felt that what may happen is other buildings that would be developed would make less significant those historical buildings that exist now that we are trying to accent. He was also concerned with the 25-foot setbacks at corners and felt that what would occur visually in the street is that those intersections are going to seem to close up as opposed to open which would happen with the 45 foot setback on both sides. Commissioner Chitiea pointed out that the reason for the 25-foot setbacks wzs to invite pedestrians to cross the street. Commissioner Emerick suggested that native shrubs and bushes be emphasized in the Sycamore Inn and Thomas Winery areas. He also suggested that Crape myrtle trees be used in place of the Flowering plum trees. He further recommended the use of river rock and rustic woods in the landscaping theme, particularly in the Sycamore [nn area. Commissioner Chitiea encouraged making transition areas so that there would not be a sharp definition between Bear Gulch and Thomas Winery. She suggested that one way might be through the use of consistent lighting standards throughout the entire boulevard to allow for the changes in landscaping and architecture and would maintain continuity and flow. i;i. oui ier cau ci mied crying to aeveiop c n terra for tntenstty of lighting may cause liability problems for the City. He suggested that criteria could be established relative to the direction of lighting so that it is in the right location on the property. He additionally pointed out that the City may have to take over the responsibility for maintenance, which would require some sort of maintenance district. Commissioner Chitiea stated she would like to look at the range of possibilities and to see the alternatives that might be suggested by the consultant and the type of cost that might be incurred in developing a maintenance district. Chairman McNiel stated he would not like the City to assume the cost of maintenance since; however, concurred that staff should be directed to provide further information. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to ask if there should be some consideration of the types of lighting within projects that might be different from what is currently required, such as lower light standards. He felt the issue related to two types of lighting; lighting along the ,ublic right-of-way Planning Commission Minutes -3- May 18, 1987 J~~~ which is Edison maintained, and z lighting theme within projects that might be used throughout the boulevard and tying the two together. Mr. Kroutil asked for a consensus of the Commission relative to 25 foot setbacks at the activity nodes. It was the concurrence of Commission to accept the 25 foot setbacks at the nodes. Commissioner Tolstoy referred to the example drawings on page 8-14. He asked that this section be expanded to include more examples of things that could be used in activity centers. Commissioner Emerick referred to the the activity centers of Sycamore and Thomas Winery and suggested that staff explore different st reet sca pe furniture and lighting the areas between the activity nodes. Commissioner Tolstoy concurred that it would be difficult to use street furniture that is consistent and dfd not think the same bench would be appropriate in all locations. Mr. Stevens gave an overview of the plan proposal relative to the street sca pe. Chairman McNi el agreed with the Plan concept to provide and allow for the arc hf tec to ral movement and the options to the developer to tie it together with the project. Commissioner Emerick stated he would support color reference throughout the corridor but would s~rpport a style reference within specific activity areas such as Sycamore Inn and Thomas Brothers. He felt there should be more :, . -••••••..' =~ iu .nv5c dCiir iiy or'eo a. SITE SPECIFIC LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Mr. Kroutil gave an overview o' the automotive uses within the corridor. Commissioner Tolstoy stated Foothill is going to be a heavily traffic boulevard which will need to have service stations. He felt if a service station is welt designed and they want to do some car repair, the use should be allowed as well as a well designed car wash. He stated that major auto repair does not belong on Foothill; however, auto tune ups which are done within the confines of the building should be allowed. Chairman McN1e1 opened the public hearing. Luke Buc ken, representing ECOnO Lube and Tune, addressed the need for automotive service along Foothill Boulevard. He concurred that these types of uses could be properly designed and adequately screened to mitigate concerns. Steve Lucas, 9224 Foothill, supported automotive uses withir the corridor. Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 18, 1987 J ~/ Jeff Scera nka stated that the issue is one of design, not one of use. He felt that this is an opportunity for the City to capture those uses for convenience of the community as well as tax revenue. He supported automotive uses along Foothill. George Adair, Rancho Cucamonga resident, supported automotive uses within the corridor. Don Witt, 10040 Foothill, supported automotive uses and concurred that the uses were needed in the community. There were no further public comments. It was the consensus of the Commission that automotive uses should be considered within the Foothill Corridor. Specific locations and design criteria are to be discussed at a later date. Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of the Community Commercial District northerly along Etiwa nda Avenue. Chairman McNiei opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. It was the consensus of the Commission to accept the Plan proposal. Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of the Specialty Commercial along the south side of Foothill in Subarea 1. Mr. Stevens gave an overview of the Specialty Commercial uses. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the Ad Hoc Committee recamme~ed additional uses within the Specialty Commercial designation which did not appear on the current plan. Mr. Kroutil advised that this apparently was an oversight and that staff would make the necessary corrections. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Jeff Scera nka stated that medical offices should 6e allowed within the SDecialty Commercial designation as a support to San Antonio Hospital. There were no further public comments. Commissioner Chitiea recalled that the expanded uses for Specialty Commerciai proposed by the Ad Hoc Committee were specifically for Subarea i for those pieces of property. Credit unions, finance companies, medical/dental offices and clinics, opticians were to be added to the use. Planning Commission Minutes -5- May 18, 1981 s~~ It was the consensus of Commission to designate the property as Specialty Commercial with the expo nded uses suggested by the Ad Hoc Committee. SUBAREA LAND USE REGULATloNS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of the land use regulations and development standards for Subarea I. It was the consensus to require a Condi Lf onal Use Permit for discotheques in the Specialty Commercial zone, as well as dance and music studios. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Edward Hopson addressed the Sycamore Inn area and suggested that small one or two cinema theaters and dinner theaters be allowed in the Specialty Commercial zone with Cc nditi onal Use Permits. There were no further public comments. Commissioner Chitiea stated that Dorking is major issue and thought that it might adversely impact on the rest of the specialty commercial users. She did not consider a cinema to be appropriate due to the impacts of parking on homeowners above, as well as grading Concerns. Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of Subarea 2. Chairman McNfel opened the public hearing. Larry Lazur, representing Sanchez Talaricho, asked that they be given to opportunity to work with staff on the appropriate uses for the Specialty rnmm. _ ai Any: ~..~j ~~ s~.. t~E •`J~7~ai eine~y ai i.e. It was the consensus of the Commission that the property owner be allowed to work with staff on the appropriate uses which might be subject to conditional use permits. Staff was dlrec ted to prepare the necessary criteria far the Commission's consideration. Jeff Scera nka referred to various uses throughout Subarea 2 and questioned why they were not allowed in the Community Commercial areas. There were no further public comments. It was the consensus that the following uses 6e permitted within the Community Commercial designation of Subarea 2: Art, Music, Photographic Studios and Supply Stores; gook, Gift b Stationery Stores; Ice Cream and Soda Fountains; Teier s~o,^„ Radio, YCR, Stereo S CD Component Sales; and Uptician and Uptometrical Shops. Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of Subarea 3. Planning Commission Minutes -b- May 18, 1981 5~~ Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Sanford Bloom advised that he represented 13 property owners of lcts on Helms and Malachite who were joining together to develop a master plan. He expressed a concern with the appropriateness and viability of the Mixed Use/Retail designation proposed for this property. Pete Pita ssi presented a preliminary conceptual master plan for the site addressed by Mr. Bloom. The master plan depicted a specialty commercial site. It was the consensus of the Commis lion that the property owners proceed with their master plan proposals. Specific comments were deferred until the project was formally introduced and staff given the opportunity to review the proposal. Mr. Buller advised that the mixed use retail was intended to be a mix of residential and commercial. He stated that the plan does not stipulate what proportions that mix has to be; that would be at the discretion of the Commission after review of the master plan. He recommended that the Commission pursue the Mixed Use designation and that the property owners try to develop a plan that introduces some residential. He clarified that the intent was that this commercial area would service the residential area. Neldra Lovg ren, property owner within the above-mentioned master plan area, did not think that residential was an appropriate use for this area. Dan Nestley was concerned with placing additional traffic on San Bernardino Road and stated that Specialty Commercial with limited access might be the answer to She problems. n~„ u,.,.n <.,._. y..._... ;~~ .u gee jewelry and computer stores permitted in the Commercial Office ~desi~gna [ions. Mr. Kroutil advised that as you start making certain commercial users permitted you are going to get different kinds of Luildings, i.e. store fronts and exDOSU re. Jeff Scera nka stated that the intent of the Commercial Office designation was to allow ancillary commercial uses within the office desfgnations. He suggested that if the Commis Sion was concerned that the commercial uses would take over the office uses, a percentage be placed on the development. Mr. Kroutil stated he would have a concern in that the Haven Avenue Overlay District dealt with large lots and large developments whereas the lots along Foothill might be very shallow, narrow strips. He pointed out that the intent ~f the '-=mmittee was an office district with very limited retail facilities. Commissioner McNiel felt that the permitted users should be those which would 6e ancillary to services that are required by people in offices. Planning Commission Minutes -7- May 18, 1987 Spa Commissioner Chitiea suggested the antiilary approach along with the establishment of a Derce nta ge, She suggested that staff be directed to return with recommendations. Mr. Buller recommended that staff work with consultants on this Sssue. Subarea 4 Mr. Kroutil gave an overview of Subarea 4. Chairman McNiei opened the pu611c hearing. Tim Beedle, representing Reiter Development, stated that the permitted uses were narrow in focus and asked that the list De expanded. Mr. Kroutil advised that this was the direction at the Commission's previous meeting and staff would provide that information for the Commission's consideration. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Tolstoy, to continue the pu611c hearing for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to the Commls si on's regular meeting of June 24, 1987. Motion carried unanimously. 12:40 a.m. - Planning Lommislion Adjourned. ResDec tfully submitted, Brad Buller Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -B- May 18, 1987 5~-3 Priority One - The billboard on the south side of Foothill, east of Grove Priority Two - The two billboards at the northwest corner of Foothill and Archibald Priority Three - The three billboards at the southeast corner of Foothill and Vineyard Priority Four - The billboard at the northwest corner of Archibald and Hampshire x x • a x Continued Public Hearin F. FOOTN CLL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A public hearing and workshop to consi er the provis ons of the Draft Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. (Continued from May 18, 1987) Alan Warren, As sotiate Planner, presented the staff report. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, advised that the focus of the meeting would the the Permitted and Conditional Uses table. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Jeff Scera nka stated that in order for Sp etialty Commercial centers to survive they need the day to day foot traffic that is attracted by businesses such as dry cleaning establishments and banks with drive throughs. He advised that banks with drive throughs should be allowed in centers and that verv few banks woul6 consider going into a center if they were not allowed drive through features. He stated that as a member of the Ad Hoc Committee, he did not recall the Committee mandating that the MU/R designation was to be either all residential, all retail, or a mixture of both. The idea was that because of the difficult of the mix of uses and the configuration and the questions the Committee had about the type of protect that might go there, they would allow residential or commercial or a combination of both. He felt it was appropriate to allow hotel/motels along Foothill with a Conditional Use Permit. Tim Beedle stated a concern with the number of Conditional Use Permits required in Lhe various use categories and felt it would lengthen the processing time which would deter many applicants. He advocated the establishment of an administrative approval 09 Conditional Use Permits which would no*. requf re a fcrmal review by the Planning Comm ssion, Ted Hopson echoed Mr. Sceranka's comments relative to banks with drive through tellers. Mie favored allowing banks with drive throughs under the Conditional Use Permit process. Planning Commission Minutes -10- May 27, 1987 S ~ 7-' Sanford Bloom reported that 94X of the property owners surrounding his site were now in agreement on the development of a master plan. Ben Mackal advocated allowing banks and financial institutions in the Specialty Commercial designation with a Conditional Use Permit. The Commission made the following amendments to the Permitted and Conditional Use Permit Tabies: Apparel (b) wholesale and Discount stores - removed from Specialty Commercial designations; CUP required in Subarea One, CC designation Auto Service (b) Rentals - CUP required in all Subareas Cleaning and Pressing Establishments - removed from the MU/R designation in Subarea Four Day Care Centers - CUP required in 0 designation of Subarea One Floor Covering Shops - removed from SL designation in Subarea Two Janitorial Services and Suppler - removed from the CC designations in Subareas One and Two, CO designatf an in Subarea Three Liquor Stores - LUP required in the LC designation of Subarea Four Music, Dance and Martial Arts Studios - CUP required in the SC deli gna tf or. of Subarea Three, removeA from the CO designation of Subarea Three Fast Food uses separated between those with and without drive throw qhs - CUP requires in cne aC ara LL designations of Subarea One, SC and CC designation of Subarea Two, SC and CC designations of Subarea Three, CC and RRC designation of Subarea Four Shoe Stores, Sales and Re Dair - Permitted in SC designation of Subarea One, removed from the 0 designation; Permitted in the MU/R designation of Subarea Four Sporting Goods Stores (a) specialty - Permitted in the MU/R designation of Subarea Three; removed from MU/R designation of Subarea Four Discotheques - CUP required in the CC and RRC designations of Subarea Four Finance Services and Institutions - "Banks" added to the description and separated between with and without drive throughs - Without drive throughs permitted in Che SC, CC, 0 designations of Subarea One; Permitted in SC, CC, 0, designations of Subarea Two; Permitted SC, CL, CO designations of Subarea Three, CUP required is MU designation; Permitted in CC and RRC designation of Subarea Four. With drivethroughs - Conditionally Permitted in the following designations SC, CC, 0 designations of Subarea One; SC, CC, of Subarea Two; SC, CC, CO, MU of Subarea 3; CC and RRC of Subarea Four. Planning Commission Minutes -11- May 27, 1987 J ~~ Hotel Facilities, Ancf Mary Uses (d) cocktail lounges - CUP required in RRC designation of Subarea Four. Staff was directed to prepare alternatives for the Commission's consideration to allow hotel/motels in the MU area of Subarea 3, with the requirement of a marketing study to show feasibility. Additionally, a distinction was to be made between major and minor hotel/motel uses. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that Regional Related Commercial by definition is 15,000 square feet and questioned if square footage alone would be a sufficient definition. Mr. Kroutil stated staff could expand the definition by adding language that this provision is intended to facilitate development of regionally related uses and these are typli fled by large sca to businesses which serve a market area significantly larger that those businesses which draw from a neighborhood or community level. Mr. Kroutil announced that staff had sufficient direction to further modify the Plan and would bring the document back to the Commission on June 24. Motion: Moved by Chi ti ea, seconded by Emerick, unanimously carried, to continue the public hearing for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to the regular Planning Commission meeting of June 24, 1987. • s ~ . . PUDLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Chi ti ea, seconded by Emerick, unanimously carried, to adjourn. 11:55 p.m. - Planning Commission Adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -12- May 27, 1901 K. L. and ILL BOULEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan protect. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairawn McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Mitchell, representing the Chaalber of Comaerce, 9330 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, and served as a member of the ADHOC Cowaittee expressed his only concern was with the proposed range of permitted uses, including the sale of used, previously owned, or recycled merchandise at the Thomas Brothers Minery site. As Chairman of the Economic Development Cowaittee and aielWer of the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce we support recoawendation for adoption by the Commission to City Council. Mr. Howard Adler, 2081 Business Center Drive, Irvine, CA, new owner of the Thomas Nlnery, presented comments of the proposed uses and concerns. They have been working closely with staff and presented their views and concerns to the Foothill Boulevard Caawittee, presenting data prepared by Or. Alfred Goldbar. Most of their suggestions were considered and adopted by the Comaittee. However, on May 27, 1987, additional direction was given by the Planning Comaission to the staff and as a result changes were made which could hurt the economic viability of the center. The speciality center at the Thomas Vineyard Vlaulll LJ JCpb OJeJ UpUll Llla aUlll LJ w Ytti uGt u liiri Vi i~i icu tci,a i,to which included 35-40 percent of the uses Mr. Goldbar indicated in his report to make the center viable. A major clothing store or boutique would be very helpful in making the Thomas Minery more viable He questioned the exclusion of a furniture store. Mr, Adler further requested the Coaoisslon give additional thought to the speciality center permitted uses through conditional uses. Mr. Gil Rodriquez, 1797 Vallejo May, Upland, CA addressed the issue of a 50 foot greenbelt resulting in down zoning properties. Mr. Rodriquez is the property owner of the southwest corner of Foothill and Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Gary Mitchell pointed out that Rancho Cucamonga has one of the higher average income levels in the county, yet we have the lowest per capita sales. Mr. Mitchell urged the Commission to carefully consider the requests of Thomas Ninery since it holds same new economic opportunities. Since there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -12- June 24, 1987 S ~~ Chair~an McNiel stated Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is designed to enhance Foothill Boulevard by expanding and beautifying it, in addition to increasing the property value. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated that furniture stores were specifically not included in the plan, but conditionally peritted clothing stores, and not wholesale, warehouse, or discount stores were in the language of the plan. Chairman Mt Niel reopened the public hearing. Mr. Jeff Seranka expressed a concern should the ten "discount" stores be used. He believed it would be difficult to detenaine what is "discount", the determination and Interpretation of the Cosission of "discount" stores. The public hearing was closed by Chairman NcNiet. Brad Buller, City Planner, indicated that the primaary issue for the Thommmas Brothers Ninery site is Design and the desire to protect aM enhance the historical nature of the site. A secondary iaatter is the control an the type of uses penal tted. The uses permitted are Lo support and not work against the strong design goals for the site. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, indicated that additional information on maodian islands will be placed in the appendix of the dacumae nt. Loamsmissioner Chi ti ea maoved to continue Item K as meodified to the July 8, 1987 ameeting for consideration of the adoption of the plan. Conwissioner Emmmertck seconded the iaotion. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMi1SS10NER5: BLAKESLEY, CHlTIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COM4ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COlM15510NERS: NONE .::+. L. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT --carried - iu ranee ana cunsiaer a recommmenaanon ror cernncatlon or the Draft Envtronamental Imapact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan project. The specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the developcment along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Naven Avenue, between the i-35 Freeway and East Avenue. Planning Coiammission Minutes -13- June 24, 1987 ~j ~~ Alan Marren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report on the EIR for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Dian. Chairsxn Mc Niel opened the public hearing; seeing no coswents, the public hearing was closed. Coswissioner Tolstoy coved to continue Itewt L to the July 8, 1981 sleeting; motion secoMed by Cosasissioner E~erick. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~:::. NEN BUSINESS N. --carried moor - n proposal w conscrucc cwo warehouse bun dings tang 118,500 square feet on 6.25 acres in the General industrial District, Subarea 5, located south of 6th Street adjacent to an A.T.B S.F. rail spur west of Lucas Ranch Road - APN:210-071-51. Chris Nestsbn, Assistant Plantrcr, presented the staff report. Ne pointed out that in regards to Recosssendatton 6 in the Resolution, the Design Review Cos~ittee felt that with extra landscaping on the west property line of the adjacent property which is under the sasw! ownership as the project site, tt would be aooropriate t0 waive the five vard sewaca. Chairsan McN1e1 opened the public hearing. Mr. Mark Elliott, an eswloyee of the Nalbandfan Group, appeared before the Casssission to answer any questions or address any cosssents. Since there were no further puDiic cosssents, the public hearing was closed. Cos~tssloner Tolstoy saved, Cosssfssioner Chitiea seconded adoption of the resolution. Motion was carried by the following vote: Planning Coswfssion Minutes -14- June 24, 1987 s~ ~ DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AYES: COIMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE : + P. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR --carried Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Pian project. The Specific Pian consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Maven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. (Continued frem June 24, 1987). Alan Marren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Lloyd Zola, 2940 East "G" Street, Ontario, consultant for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EiR, clarified the revised student generation analysis. Under a new state law, coaaaerical areas do generate new students because employees of the area have the choice of having their students educated at the school district where they work or where they Live, establishing residency at the place of employment. When going through the analysts and eliminating double counting, the impact should be 2500 students rather than the 12,000 being generated within the district by the commercial. This is an increase over existing planned generation by 1,000 students. Under state law, commercial uses are paying 25 cents per square foot as the mitigation, so the mitigation really is payment of legally established fees for all residential and ca~ercial uses. The feet ara to " .e."~n"tito relationship impact per Chaffey Union High School District finding and have recommended for their district they be certified and also the local elementary district certify that number as being a reasonable figure. Chairman McNie1 opened the public hearing. Mr. John Melcher, rcpresentativve of Lewis Homes, stated disagreement with staff's response to their concerns over land use. He would 11ke the opportunity to submit additional data in support of their position and asked the Coawission's action regarding the land use section remain open for further discussion until the July 22, 1987 meeting. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that for the City to evaluate the new data, the information should be received as soon as possible. Mr. Paul Max, property owner an Footh111 Boulevard, expressed his desire of requesting the staff t0 include the piece of property located between Michael J's restaurant and KinderKare, the next parcel east of Turner in commercial zoning. The present proposed land use zoning shows up to Turner as befog CC/Commercial. From that point forward incorporating Michael J's, the vacant piece of property of which he is an owner, and Planning Commission Minutes 28 July 08, 1987 .5 9~ DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY heading east as being Commercial Office/Office Coaaw!rctal. He requested to be included 1n the Coaaaercial Zone which would encoagass Michael J's restaurant which is an existing use which fits into the Coo.ercial Office. Most of the uses which would be requiring Conditional Use Persit under the Coawercial zoning would also be requiring Conditional Use Perwit under the Coaaaercial Office zoning. He asked what the process would be in order to request frog Planning this particular change. He stated he was adding 1.6 acres into what has already been proposed. Coa~issioner Chitiea questioned Mr. Max whether there was not already a proposal for an office on that particular site. Mr. Max clarified there was an office proposal for the property. They went through the entire planning process and have designed an office building and would like the opportunity to Aave the option. This does not a~ean they won't build the office building but it awy be better as a Coaaaercial zone and not an Office zone. He requested ti ax: to aw:et with staff and smoke saae aaveaknt in that direction. Mr. George Guiders, 7363 Garnett, Rancho Cucaagnga, property owner on Foothill Boulevard stated his interest in the Foothill Corridor Study. The ADHOC Ca~ittee was instructed not to look at the lnteri^ part, fray Haven Avenue, Terra Yizta, Barton Develop~ent to the I-15 because it has been master planned. In the areas that the Corridor Study consisted of, the oajorfty of the land area has been built out as a buffer between residential and coaaaerciai, where Sycamore inn and &ar Gulch. The ADHOC Coawittee gave its recoaaaendation. !f there is Coaaw:rciai to be reawved it should be Ca~ercial reagved where there is still slot of vacant land where it is to be designed atherly, such as Terra Vista nrnnerhy TM~ Aavn •M i......• -e u~ii i.:cri ' -v--~ ~ n~ciWc yulny LIII'YUyi~, Le[ econaaics dictate what goes in. Mr. John Nolt, 9335 Carnelian, Alta Laaw, stated he sat on the ADNOC Coasaftte and wanted to update the Commission on what was being done regarding the land use and coaaaercial designation. It was brought up at one of the first ex'eting, there was 'too arch' caaaaercial allocation 1n land use zoning. After discussions and extended debate and input fray residents, a conclusion was made the Citiy would be far better off and far ahead to have this land allocated as commercial and allow the growth to happen as Foothill Boulevard is controlled. If the City does not develop a base to support Caaaurcial at that time consider changing the zoning. They tried to write a docrwent to provide direction and allow for flexibility and the ability to be fluid in that area and save the land rather than have 1t Dutld up under residential zoning wtthout proper control. Me asked the Caaaissfon to be aware of the aarount of coaaercial property being set aside, the dollar figures versus population and business growth which was all considered Tn the ADHOC Cowaittee's debate and discussion. Planning Coarpission Minutes 29 July O8, 1987 S !i DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Larry Arci nags, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, concurred with the comments of Mr. Max and Mr. Holt. Asa developer, they look at property if it will make economical sense. Developers will not develop and build out any Commercial if there aren't households to support it. It takes 2,000 residences to support a shopping tenter. He requested the Comaission to carefully look over the information the ADHOC Coamittee provided and carefully weigh their decision and recommendations. Coa.issicner MtNiei closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea complimented Mr. Max on the design of their pro3ect and felt it would be an asset to Foothill in their present design, Coewfssioner Chitiea moved to continue Item P to the July 22, 1987 meeting. Commissioner Tolstoy secoMed the motion. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COiMISSI0NER5: HONE ~ " " * ~ --carried Q. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (Continued from June 24, 19871. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. It was requested that an opportunity be provided to the Chamber of Commerce to review the plan once more. This is scheduled July 15, 1981 for submittal of additional cnmrntc th'v •av hau. Chairman MtNfel opened the public hearing. Since there were na comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chitiea moved to continue Item Q to the July 22, 1981 meeting. Coaissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUU:ESLEY, CHI TI EA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; NONE f • # R f R. ENVIR ..+vnw - n reyuesc u an reflect land use Specific Plan, Planning Commission Minutes 30 OF proposed by the July 08, 1987 s ~a DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY -Ll ~ r Vr wM1.rv LULTrVwnn - MI aNCnuwCnL w rtwurc rr{Iw Lrw: cclwanaa pet c an approziaw ly 57 acres of land on the nroth side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue; approxiaw rely 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Eti wands Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and approxiawtely 14 acres ofland on the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24, 25 6 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 8 22-27, APN 227- 231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 A 34, APN 229-311-14 6 15, APN 229-041-10, and portions of APN 227-231-16 a 23. va - Llrr ur nnwcmi LYIr/rwlIIIN - M awe nurenc w rewave rrw cne us r a rea pec c an approxiawtely 80 acres of land on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229-031-01, 16 b 20 and portions of 229-021-57 8 59. Chairawn McNiel opened Lhe public hearing. Since there were ca~ents, the public hearing was closed. Cowaissioner Blakesley awved continuation of ItM R to the Juiy 22, 1987 aeeting. Caw.issioner Eaw!rick seconded the eotion. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE •++~. --carried T. ENYIRONIiENTAI ASSESSMENT AND DEYELOPMENT REVIEN 87-11 - UNOCAL -The eve opa~en o a square oo ay sere ce s a on on 0.69 acres of land within an approved shopping center in the Neighborhood Coaaaercial District, located at the northeast corner of Haven and Hfghiand Avenues - APN 201-271-68. ' Nancy Fong, Associate Dlanner, presented the staff report. Mr. Dennis Carlson, Unocal representative, 1432 North Main Street, Orange, concurred with the staff report. Ne questioned the multiplaning of the office windows on the front of the building representing the right side and the righthand side of the elevation. The only objection is Unocal's sales pranotional signing, in cost cases, window identification. The sign ordinance provides for soave! free-standing ground-aaunted signs advertising placed on the site. Th1; would laspact upon their use of the area for advertising and requests relief frowt the Coawisston regarding this issue. He questioned the City Engineer Planning Coa~~atssion Minutes 31 Juty 08, 1987 5~ 3 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTN ILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAT Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan project. The Specific Plan consists of detaSled land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. (Continued from July 8, 1987). Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. In addition, Alan Warren, Associate Planner gave a brief overview of the project. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, presented comments regarding the concern about the Red Hill realignmen. The plan proposes to realign it directly to Grove Avenue. He said City of Upland felt that this would cause unacceptable traffic impacts upon existing neighborhoods in the City of Upland and on Grove Avenue itself in the City of Upland. He stated the property owners' traffic consultant stressed that the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive through the property would impact the property greatly and then would have traffic impacts on Grove Avenue. However, he stated that the study failed to adequately address the alternates impacts on properties within Rancho Cucamonga, existing properties on Foothill Boulevard or the Red Hill neighborhood itself. In the overall analysis of the impacts, he believes that the impact on Red Hill which would be caused by a direct connection to Foothill Boulevard would be greater than the impacts caused by the connection to Grove Avenue. In order t0 connect Red Hill Country Club Drive to Foothill, one would have to go through a smaller peace of property which would involve the entire lot. The connection would then require a traffic signal which would encourage still further short-cut traffic znrougn cne Hed HIII area which would very heavily impact the existing underdesigned roadway. This serves the Red Hill area adequately but is not a collector road. If the reroute of Red Hfll Country Club Drive is directly to Grove Avenue, which is the alternate presented in the plan, he expected a decrease of about 50 percent in the traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive and add a neglible amount of traffic to Grove Avenue. The development of the corner property is the question here. All impacts were reviewed and the proposed realignment to Grove provides the least impacts of the three which were considered. Mr. Alan Marren summarized that in CalTrans response they favorably mentioned this Grove alignment in thefr analysis as being appropriate for Foothill traffic situation. All throughout the analysis, the reason why the City initiated the plan, was to lessen the anticipated impacts without the specific plan in the future. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Mr. Ron Sackett, 7723 Calle Casino, Rancho Cucamonga, read a letter in addition to handing it out to the Coaission. He represents the San Antonio Community Hospital, the owner of the property that would be Planning Commission Minutes 1 July 22, 1987 DRAFT FoR DICCIIS~ION PURPUSES Gf~ DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY directly impacted by the realignment. He stated the City has never responded to Lheir reports by a professional traffic engineer. To this time, they could never respond to Questions raised by the City in regards to the report. They would like to see the City delay a decision on this issue. Mr. Jeff Blooa, City of Upland Planning Director, 460 North Euclid, stated the concern for the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive and its impacts on the City of Upland. Mhat changes have been made to the draft resolution2 Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, gave Mr. Bloom a copy of the draft resolution and stated there had been added the mandatory findings of CEQA. Mr. Bloom indicated the City of Upland is very disturbed by the prospects of realigning Red Hill Country Club Drive. He referred to the letter of June 23, 1987 that outlined the areas of the draft Environmental Report that in particular concerns the City of Upland. They believe the response Lo comments continues to ignore the impacts which may arise from the implementation of the proposed realignmant. He was concerned that we were not Lrading off impacts from one city to the other. The mitigation measures suggest the realignment should occur expeditiously, the report concludes the realignment is conceptual. Does this mean we aren't adopting any realignments and arc we going to do a full environmental assessment and actually route a Red Hill realignment to Grove Avenue or to any other area along Foothill Boulevard2 If this is not the case, he suggested that this EIR has not fully addressed the different technical needs as far as the realignment and the Impacts it would have. It would seem appropriate t0 the City of Upland to do such a detailed analysts before making a decision. They did point out in the ietGer Gllal LIIC ac U1a1 Ia11J uae Iwyl l<,a 41UO! UII NIC pl Vptl 41' >nvu1J oe addressed and they were unable to find satisfactory evidence that this had been addressed. The impacts, in City of Upland's opinion, will greatly cause the traffic on Grove Avenue to increase and conflict with the local residential trafffc that already uses Grove Avenue and instead of eliminating a problem they would be compounding a problem on Grove Avenue. Mr. Jim Chase, 8467 Red Hil Country Llub Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, spoke on behalf of the Red Hill Country Club. He expressed the views of the country club stating the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive through Kramer property to Grove is merely taking the problem from Foothill and moving it to Grove. They are very much opposed to the option of going through the Kramer property. Mr. Larry Arcinage, 765G Calie Casino, Rancho Cucamonya, owner of five parcels within the specific plan area. He expressed he had not received a notice of this meeting. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PUP°OSES r'" Planning Commission Minutes July 22, 1987 S9s DRAFT .=OR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Chairman McNiel clarified that the process regarding Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan has been going on for 1-2 years indicating it has been a continued meeting which had been appropriatedly notice. Mr. Arcinage stated opposition Lo the recommendation to the rerouting of Red Hilt Country Club Drive to Grove Avenue. There is already access to Foothill Boulevard. Ne felt that the sales tax dollars would 6e taken away from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and sent to the City of Upland rather than having the people turning into Rancho Cucamonga and spending their dollars here. Ne concurred with Mr. Chase's comments and suggested the Commisison take a longer viewpoint, have RSK give another study, Enough public opinion should indicate that the local people are against it. Once this gets to the council agenda, there will be more vocal opposition. Ms. Elisa Ricardless, owner of the gas station involved in the corridor, stated opposition feeling it would affect her business a great deal. She felt that a decrease in her business would mean less taxes for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Mr. Jack Madson, 1521 N. Nebster, representative of HMC Architects in Claremont, who represents the owner of the property on the corner in question, San Antonio Coemunity Hospital. One of the issues brought out by the City in their review of the research and study taking place indicated the property in question would be required to provide the direct access. In discussion with Paul Rougeau, they discussed this was a major issue in developing that particular access directly from Red Hill to Foothill Boulevard. The hospital is very concerned to the point that they want the City to know they are willing to work with the City and are willing and able to make that property available. He indicated the City should be able to appreciate their concern and what thev are oitering to this regard. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Blakesley asked the comments of the ADHOC Committee. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated the committee discussed these issues but initially had no real preference as to the realignment. In the beginning, the traffic people had no preference. The advisory committee discussed this at length, a lot of people for and against the realignment. The decision was made based on the traffic and engineering analysis. It doesn't make sense to put a traffic light in the location on foothill and create another median break, create another signalized intersection, where there is an option to solve most of the problems is another way, One point to consider, specifics of the realignment have Dean purposefully left out to allow enough flexibility to make the best use of engineering practices and use of land to make it work. They know exactly where the alignment would enter onto Grove and where the alignment would enter onto the property in the southeast corner, but rather than putting down specific 11ne between the two Dints, it was felt by the Committee and Commission that part of it should be left Planning Commission Minutes 3 „ July 22, 1987 Ut-:.~ ~ FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY S9ro DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY fiexibile. The design then could be dealt with in a realistic and intelligent fashion. Mother point t0 consider is when people look at Foothill Boulevard today, the need to do something may not appear that obvious. What is being looked at now is Lhe long term plan where traffic flow is approaching an average 60,000 daily trips which is significantly more than the existing boulevard can handle. Ones of the most significant components of the Foothill Plan is a rather stringent traffic control system that stretches from the Upland city limits to the Fontana city limits. It is integrated, and provides for a median and signals that are spaced in locations for the optimum in timing and also provides traffic access controls. It provides the best ultimate solution which will work for all the other concerns. The Red Hill realignment is only a small component of tFie overral system. Chairman Mc Niel stated that Foothill Boulevard is going to carry a tremendous amount of traffic and this will be very difficult to maintain the traffic through the community. One of the things not to do is put signals at every intersection where it will slow traffic flow. Foothill Boulevard will be three lanes going in each direction. The best method is to put as few stops in Foothill Boulevard as possible. Where this is proposed to align onto Grove Avenue is at the driveway of the shopping center that is right across the street of Grove, adjacent to residential but is at commercial. There should be reduction of traffic across Red Hill and Alta Cuesta. This Ts the appropriate solution to the abundance of the traffic on Foothill Boulevard. Now is the time to make a sound judgment. Commissioner Emerick felt the proposed alignment has been well analyzed by the staff and advocates the realignment from the discussion heard. Comwissioner Chi ti ea agreed with the commmnts of Chairman McNiel and ~omaissioner Emerlik. Une of the major reasons that a stop light was not to be put in by the Sycamore Inn would be encouragement for traffic to go through Red Hill arhi that would certainly impact the neighborhood. The decision was not made capriciously and this was given a great deal of thought. There 1s not an ideal solution but the one proposed would be the Dest. As for the argument that it impacts on the neighborhoods in Upland, the residential area is above this, there is no impact through the Upland residential area whatsoever. This is all south of that development and directly across from Upland's very large conmw!rcial center which they are expanding upon themselves and will be inviting a great deal of traffic to that commercial center at approximately the same location in from Grove. Chairman McNiel asked for comments on the other parts of the draft EI R. Commissioner Chitiea felt the draft EIR had been adequately addressed. Chairman McNtel stated the City has been a city of plans and districts, a city that exceeds what needs to be done in order to plan a reasonable community. He recognized the efforts of the ADHOC Comwittee and feels Planning Commission Minutes 4 July 22, 1987 DRAFT i=OR DISCUSSI~y,PURPOSES ONLY Foiz Discuss oN pv RPOSES ONLY this document is an enormous undertaking. He requested thank you notes be sent to those who were on the ADHOC Committee. Commissioner Emerick moved for adoption of the resolution recommend{ny certification by the City Councfl on Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Commissioner 8lakesley seconded the motion. Motion was unanimously carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY Otto Kroutil confirmed this Ts the revised resolution and includes the Statement of Overriding Considerations. w *,t. ~ --carried C. FOOTHILL BOULEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A public hearing to consider approva o e ra oo ulevard Specific Plan. The draft Specific plan provides for detailed land use categories and development standards far, all future developments on properties adjacent to Foothill Boulevard (Continued from July 8, 1987). Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. He commented on the modifications and minor changes clarifying certain points in the plan. Staff had receive4 no negative response from the Chamber of Ccmmerce in their presentation on July 15, 1987 and have received their support. From the discussion regarding the permitted u aea inuiuaing apparel stores and mt nor repairs, it is the understanding that allowing generai apparel stores in the specialty commercial and community commercial is the direction of the Commission. This would involve elimination of wholesale and discount stores as a category. The same comment relates to the minor repair since the direction of the Commission was to allow minor automobile repair conditionally with a Conditional Use Penit in Community Commercial areas. Chairman MtNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Sanford Btaom, owner of the property at 9494 Foothill Boulevard, spokesman on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Harold Lundgren and Mr. Hillgren, as well as a number of owners of small nonconforning tots facing Foothill. Mr. Bioom's had a concern with the the definition of Mixed Use. This would benefit by the greater flexibflity and the broadening that the Commission allotted to it than it. This definition should be replaced by one which reflects the fact that the property could be developed as all commercial, all residential, or a mixture of the two. He also stated his concern with the westward extension of Estacia and the northward extension of Malachite. He felt the Cammissi i would want to promote the best possible circulation for the development of the Planning Commission Minutes 5 Juiy 22, 1987 9~ DRAFT FOR ~CUSSION PURPOSES ONLY DRAF'T' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY property consistent with comaunity needs including the issue of access and egress of San Bernardino Road. Mr. Jeff Bloom restated opposition regarding proposed realignaent of Red Nill as indicated in the draft of the Specific Plan. The City of Upland is concerned with the traffic impacts which would occur on Grove Avenue and the land use iapacts which would occur as a result of the realignment. It is possible, in the opinion of the traffic engineers for the City of Upland and the report for the hospital, to develop intersections which they do not believe tapact overly Foothill Boulevard, in particular the aatching of alignments with San Bernardino Road in a "T' intersection would enable that alignmN•nt to occur without the addition of additional signalization. the City of Upland does share the City of Rancho Cucamonga's pride in the fact that a lot has been accomplished in tackling the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Mr. Ron Sackett, 7723 Calle Casino, Rancho Cucamonga, stated opposition to the Red Hill Country Club Drive and feels it would seriously impact the property, Mr, Larry Arcinage, 7650 Calle Casino, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the tree standards on the corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated that the City is trying to avoid two sets of specific plans in regards to this Intersection. They recoaaend the strip of sand subject to the Etiwanda Plan be removed frog the Etiwanda Plan and be repiaced by the provisions of the Foothill Plan. They are asking the Commission if the provisions relative to the Eucalyptus grove are appropriate and if so, those provisions ought to be added to the draft of the Foothill Plan. Mr. Arcinage objected to the idea than rhis W_ lc;t_~,;„u Le ices and ttK iwnner co now things cone up for discussion~at the last afnute. Chairman Mc Niel clarified that pieces of property governed by two governing plans will have one plan extracted and governed by one. Mr, Jim Chase, 8467 Red Hi11 Country Club Drive, Rancho Cucaaanga, voiced opposition for the realignment of Red Ni11 Country Club Drive. Nelda Longren, 1205 North Third Avenue, Upland, concurred with Dr. Bloom, regarding the acreage on the afxed use land use issue. They need room and flexibility to work. They have almost 1,000 feat on Foothill Boulevard to be developed, she stated. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Caamtssioner Emerick coamented on Mr. Arcina9e's conerns on last-minute discussion and agreed with his coaaents. The staff has done a very good job with the plan and the complexity of the plan, Commissioner Chitiea canwented on Mrs. Lundgren's aixed use piece. This Planning Commission Minutes 6 pRq~ July 22, 1981 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY S-9 9 T DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY plan should allow for the flexibility that is needed and proagtes development and creativity. Commissioner Chitiea roved adoption of the plan as corrected with the infonwtfon therein, Comrlssioner Emerick seconded the motion. Nation 3 was unanimously carried by the following vote: i AYES: COIMISSIONERS: BUIKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CgMISS10NERS: TOISTOY ~- * * * * * --carried DRAFT rOR DISCUSSION FJRPOSES ONLY Planning Commisslon Minutes 7 July 22, 1987 ~0(~ Date: August 19, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT c~n''~oyc ~ ~. ~ A J ~ I> nvn I To: City Council and City Manager Fran: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Blane W. Frandsen, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Area VII storm drain and approval of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration therefor taECOMEID1f1TI011- It is hereby recaamended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the pr sed Area VII storm Drafn and and issuance of a Negative Declaration therefor and direct the Cfty Clerk to file a Notice of Determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. RMLVSIS/sACI~ROUkD: Thfs report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study far the proposed Area VII storm drain. to conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached documerrt has been prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned improvements. f aiA ty...._..-.--•- .~.....~~.,:~".> ycue, ui iy entail me wnstructian of a mainline or masterplan stone drain from the Oeer Creek Channel to Turner Avenue, aloeg Hunbolt Street then along the north side the A.T. 6 S.F. Railway to a point of 550 feet west of Turner Avenue thence north to Feron Boulevard, then west on Feron Boulevard to the existing drainage Swale and flood wntrol right of way 180 feet west of the Turner Avenue, thence north past the Cucamonga Middle School within the flood wntrol right of way crassing Arrow Route and Placer Court to connect to the existing flood control drains 1250 feet south of Foothill Boulevard and south of the existing Moble Hame Park. It is the Engineering staffs finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified for issuance of a Negative Decl oration. Res pectfui ly submitted, I „~ - ~ f, .q..~..Q .. ~ _~ . ~, tom. RHM:BWF:ma Attachments ~Q~ ~ +~ -.~'` CITY 07 AAHCNO COCAMONGA PAAS II - INITIAL SI1'DY ENVIRONME.gTAL CHECfiLIS7 DATE: APpLICAN'f: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga FILING DATE: LOG ~~~. PgO,IECI: Area VII Storm Drain - Mainline System PROTECT LOCATIDN: ~-pprgginsgg Area VII (S/o Foothill U/o Turner N/o A T 8 S.F. Railroad gnu E/o~!'~Ol rf"R'7E:me I. E'iYIRON!¢NTAL It4ACT5 (Eaplanatlon of all "qee" and "magbe" ansvera ors required on attached aheeea). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geolo¢v. !7111 the proposal have ^ignificant raaulta Sn: a. Una ta63e ground conditlona or in changaa !o geologic relaelanshipa? _ x o. Oisrup[ions, dlaplaeeman[a, compaction or burial of the soil? x c• Change !n topography or ground surface - concour lntarvale? _ __ x d. The dascruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ __ x e. Mq poeentlal inereate !n wind or vaeer erosion of soils, affecting either on oz off cite conditona? _ x f. Changes in eroalon siltation, or deposition? _ x _ g. Eapaaura m[ people or proparey'to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landalidea, mud- slides, ground failure, or elmllar hasarda? x h. M increase in the race o[ •act roc tlon and/or use o[ any mineral rasourca? _ x 2. Hydro loev. (7111 the prnpoaal Aava aignif !cane resulca in: Q~ YES vAYEE \0 a. Changes in currents, or the eourae of direction of flw£ng streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? x b. CAangsa !m abaorp cion rates, drainage patterns, or ehs rau and amount of surface eater runoff? ~ __ c. Al eerations to ehe coura• or floe of Flood Va tora2 , X d. Changm 1a ehe amount of surface weer Sa any body of wa4r? x •. Discharge lato surface va tars. or any el ease tioa of surface wage gwllty? ~ f. Alteration of groundwater charaetaris tics? x g. Chanie 10 the gwncl Cy of groundvaters, eiehar through dlnce sdditiow or vith- dtavals. or through imcerfaramce vich an aquifer? Qualiey? Quaneicq? x h. 'Ihe teduction 1o the awunc of wtsr ochar- visa available for public eater supplies? x i. FSeposurt of people or property to vatic nlaud hasazds such as flooding or aaichea? x 3. Air Qualt eY. A111 ehe pzopaul hmve signltleane results in: a. Constant or periodic air mmlaslona from mobile or indlrsee mourcea? x Seatiowq mourcea? - -- x b. Dscmeloratlom of ambiene air quality and/ot inNtfmreme• vich the •tcainment of applicable air gwllty standards? x c. Al oration of local or regional climatic condlciow, effecting air movement, mo istur• x or pmperatuze? _ 4, Biota F1~ra. V111 thm proposal fiave algnifieane coulee in: s. Change 1n the charac a riaeics of spaciu, including diversity, die crlbucian, or nwber of any species of piano? ~ _~ x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species o[ plants? ~ 03 _ x ?a;e 1 YES .iYEE FO <. Introduction of nw or diarup cave speciea of plants into an area? _ x d. Reduction in the potential far agricultural production? __ X Fauna. W111 the proposal have sigaiflcant reaul es in: a. Change in ehs charactaria ties of speciea, including divsraity, diserlbucion, or numbers of any speciea of animals? _ x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rar• or endangered species of animals? __ X e. Incrodueeion of ow mr dfazWptive epaclee of animals into an area, or result in a barrLr to the migration or mvaarat of animals? __ x d. Oecerforacian oe removal of exletiag fish oz wildlifs habitat? -3- 5. Population. W121 the proposal have signif feanc resoles in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, dens itq, diversity, or grouch rate of the human population of an area? _.1L b. N111 the pfopasal affect evi era ~_ h^^_!!.^.e, =. create a dsmaad for additional housing? y~ _ 6. Socio-Eeononie Factors. Will the proposal have signif Scant results in: a. Change in local or regioNi socio-aconamic eharactatlatSCS, Zncluding economic oc eoaimareLl diversity, tea rate, and property velwa? ~ .L _ b. WS31 project costs be equitably discribufed among proJeet benaEltiarlea, i.e., buyers, tax payers or proJact user? ]L, _ 7. I-and Vse and Planning Coniideraci one. 4111 cA! proposal have signif icane rasul to ln? a. A •ubacanclal alteration of the present or planned land us• of an area? ~, ~ x_ 6. A conflict rich any daaignations, obJectives, policies, or adop cad plans of any governmental entities? _ x- e. M impact upon the qulalcy or quantity o[ r axlf tang eonaumpeiva or non-eonaumpelve / O teetaacfonal opportunities? ~j Y' ~ _,~ _ _ Paqe G YT_5 :AY9° VO 8. transnortatian. will the proposal have significant results in: a. Ganaratlon of substanclal additional vehicular movemen c? x 6. Etteeta on exist ing streets, or demand for nev acraat eonaernccion? x c. Effects on axistiag parking facilltlss or , deeend for nev parking? _ x d. Substantial Smpaet upon uLting cransporta- cion ayeeaut _ x e. Aleeratione to pruent patterns of circula- tion or movamaae of people sad/or goods? % f. wltazatiow to or etfacts on prasane aed potmelal vatar-borne, rail, mass transit or air eratflc? _ ~ x g. Ineranas !n traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclian or padgtriana? x 9. Culcura~ur~as, pill eha propoul have •igniflcant ruulta in: a. A dla curbance to the integrity of archaeological, palaoocologlcal, and/or his corleal resources? __ x 10. Neal th, Safety and Nulaanc• Paetors. 17111 chs proposal Lava significant results in: •. Creatloa of anq health hazard or potential health hazard? 1L b. Exposure of pwplr co pouneial hulch hazards? _ __ ~ c. A risk of explosion ar relate of hazardous subseaneaa !n the want of an accident? __ x d. M increase in the number of lnd ividuals or species of woos or pachenogenlc organisms or she expoeur• of peop is so sash organiama? x e. lncrusa in existing noise levels? x _ f. Expesun of people to potentially dangerous noise 1weL? x g. the creation of ob~etciona6l• odors? _ x h. M ineruu in light oe glare? '^ ,J W _ x __ _ ~~ 'r. 2a;e Y~5 `SAY3E VO 11. Aes eheciea. Will cha proposal have •ignif Scant rnulca Sa: a. She obstruecion or de{zadaclon of anq scenic vista or vlev? x b. She creation of an uaehaeieally offensive afu? x e. A conflict with the obl eccive of designated or pouaeial acult eonidors? _ X 12. Utilities and Public {aMcu. Will the proposal have a •ignlfiuac nand for aav systems. or alc srationa to cha follovlag: a. flao[ric paver? x b. Natural or packaged gu7 _ x S. COaY1t61Ge1a0a gaceeo? ~ ~ % d. Water supply? ~ _ ~_ _ e. Wutevacat fae111tiu? _ R _ f. Flood control attuecuru? x g. Solid vsac• facilities? _ _,___ x h. Firs nro t.rrir~+ ~_ 1. Police proteetioni _ ~c 1. Schools? ,~ __ k. Pazka or other racraacloaal taci11t1ee? ~ _ 1. tLlntenanea o[ pu611e fatlllciaa, Sncludin{ roads and flood Control faeilltfu? x s. Othae gowrmeneal urvices? _ x 11. 6neray and Scarce Resources. W111 the proposal have algni[icanc rnulcs ln: a. Uae o! wbecanelal or axeuefva foal or energy? r x b. Subacan cfal increaa• Sn demand upon axlacing eourcea of energy? ~ x c. M Snereaaa in cha deund for developwnt o[ ntv sources of sner{y7 _ x d. M lncreaee or perpatwtlon of cha conauarycion of non-raaaevabl• fora of soar{y, vhu fuefbl• ranwa6U wureu o[ anar{y era avallablal _ x _ ~A~ ~P page E YES :AYBE VO •. Substantial daplaelon of any nonrenewable or stern wcural resource? z 14. l4ndatorv FLndinas of Si¢~Lficance. ^. Does the prolaet have the potential co descade the gwlltq of the atrolrenment, aubatantiallq reduce eha habitat of [fah or vi1d11ta species, caws a fish oz wildlife population to drop belw calf auatalnln~ lwala, ehruten to allmiwte a plant ar anLai coaeamity, reduce the nusbar or ruerlet eha ransa o[ a rare or endanprad plant or u1sa1 er eliminan important azampln of the salor periods of California hie toey or pzehia tort'? x b. Dou the prof ect have tM potential to achiwe abort-term, to the QSsadvaataAa of lonptea, arvisowental ~oals7 (A abort-tea impact oa the auvlronaut i• one which occurs in a ralativaly brial, definitive period of etas wA31e lon`- tea iapacta will endure wall into the future). _ x c• Doaa the psol act have Lpaeta which era ~` indlvidwlly 13aiitad, but cumulaeivaly eowiderabla? (Cuamlatlvaly cewiderabla auw [hat the Sneraarnul aflaeu o[ as individwl psolect era cowidarabla when viwed in tonnes clop with eha affects of put prolaets, and probable fueura proleeta). _ x d. Does the prof ece have environmancal effaces which will owe subataatlal advana aflaeca on hewn beln{s, eithae dlracelq or iodfreccly? _ __ x II. DISCUSSION OF ENPIBDID¢lFtAL EVAIVASION (S.a., of affirmative answers co the above quas flow plot a discussion of propoud mltiRacion meuures). See A[[ached (~ D~ r. Page 7 III. DETEAYINATION On the bads of this Snletal evalwcion: O I find the proposed pm~eec CODLD NOT have • significant dfecc on the eevlronamt, and a NEGATIVE DECI.IRATION will be prepaced. I fled that although the proposed pto~ecc could have a ^lgnlficant effect on the eavlto,aent, [hare vlll not be t signlfleant sFfecc in Chia cue beeawe the aFUgation alusurp daserlbad on ae attached ahnt have bees added to the pro,]ect. A NEGATIVE DECLAMTION WILL flE PREPARED. ^ I ffod the proposed pto~ecc NAY have a •igaiticanc affect on the envinmeot, and an @iVIflONMENi LyPACT REPORT Se required. Date A![GUST /~/ LH. ~~~L../ ~ --..f/d- ~]- Tn-~Snigna~ure 71e1 I nO a DISCUSSIgi DF ENYIRpINENTAL EVALUATIQIS 1. SOILS & 6EDLDGY b) Displacement of Solis An estimate 4 to 5 thousand cubic yards of material will be displaced by the storm drain installation. It is proposed that such material be spread and deposited in the vacant field south of Feron Boulevard west of Turner Avenue. Such lands are owned by the City. Such deposit of materials will be used to regrade this area for the developnerrt of the North Town Park. f) There has traditionally been a problem of errosion along the parkway south of Alpine Street. The storm drainage will be undergrounded or piped through this area eliminating this traditional errosion problem. 2. HYDOLODY The essence and nature of an improved storm drain systen is to collect stone runoff Into a pipeline or channel mid to carry such fn a controlled fashion to a receiving facility. In this case the waters of drainage area VII within the City of Rancho Cucamonga are proposed to be collected into a storm drain pipeline and transmitted to the Deer Creek Charmel. b, c,d 8 e) The drainage pattern is altered by the new storm drain construction bringing the stone waters to the Deer Creek Channel at a new connection point north of 8th Street. Prior to this time such ..st ..e~_rnn •hu nun. rrmY rAannnl n1 _ ahn of 6fh crr ont. The storm waters have traditionally followed Turner Avenue in mi old concrete d rubble channel at the east edge of the roadway. This existing channel is rated to be deficient with the potential of storm water overflowing the channel and flooding the street. The new connection will reduce the amount of storm water to be carried 6y Turner Avenue south of 8th Street but will not eliminate this potential. Sections of the existing drainage system are earthen swal es being sub,7 ect to erosion. These will be replaced by the proposed pipeline. The previous silt pickup and transport io Deer Creek Channel, although minimal in nature, will be eliminated by the proposed construction. f 6 g) An unmeasurable and minor infiltration of storm waters to the ground has occurred along the old open channel storm drain systen north of Fnrnn, BO pl, avar d. As fhls reach i5 recnns trVCt ed wi P,h a new storm drain pipe, the irrfiltratian previously experienced will be further reduced, if not eliminated. ~~/ i) The exposure of people to flood centrol hazards will 6e significantly reduced in both direct and Indirect relief of traditional and historic flooding problems. First, the old earthen channels north of Feron Boulevard to south of Foothill Boulevard will be replaced with the new closed storm drain. Drainage within the surface channel which in the past has been significant is reduced Lo near elimination leaving only surface nuisance water flowing between the frequent pickup points to the system. The old open culverts across Placer Street and grraw Route will be removed. Open culverts leading to the existing swales will be ,joined to the new storm drain making access by manhole only. The open channel has traditionally passed through the Cucamonga Middle School Playground. The storm drain undergrounds all of these traditional surface flows. There are areas south of Feron Boulevard which have traditionaly flooded as the swamp point in the existing system. This wndition will be eliminated and these properties will become 6uilda6le. Turner Avenue served as the drainage channel for runoff from Drainage Areas V, YI, and VII including overflows from Alta Lana Drainage Basins. Traditional flooding of Turner Avenue has made this street impassable in mafor storm events. It is to be noted that the proposed Area YII drainn reduces the volume of storm flow in Turner gvenue south of 8th Street. The laterals built along Turner Avenue itself draining to this project also divert flows from the street reducing the street flooding problem. Due to lack of up strewn protection above the Area VII Drainage Basin, storm waters will continue to flood Turner Avenue north of Foothill Boulevard. Such waters will carry down stream and continue to flow Turner Avenue from Foothill south to 4th Street. The down strewn drains of the Area VII systems will or can only provide partial relief to this traditional problem. 4. BI OTO - FANMq d) It is rated that the nuisance waters have accumulated south of Feron Boulevard and are running with sufficient consistenctng to allow for frogs to inhabit the old earthen swales south of Feron Boulevard. The culture is not natural to the area, having migrated to inhabit the strewn bed. Their presence is considered for most purposes a nuisance yet is in evidence. The uidergroundin9 of storm dram wili disturb this. 5. PGPULATIOM a) It is noted that the installation of the new storm drain eliminates several public nuisance factors affectin- life within this (a/D area of the community; namely, elimination of several open storm drains and helping to remove storm runoff in several moor streets. This has the potential for attracting mare people to the area as the area is made better to live in. b) The removal of the storm drainage iron those areas south of Feron Boulevard does open those vacant properties to development by eliminating along standing flooding problem. It would be the intent of the City to develop a part of these lands into a public park. The reminder is zoned for and has the good potential to develop into single family or multipie family residents. a 6 b) Social Ewnanic Factors The undergrounding of storm runoff within the drainage Area VII reduces public hazard to storm runoff. This has the potential for increasing property value, but without a manner to measure such. The pro,)ect is funded by Drainage Funds, with reimbursement from the Redevelopment Agency's low and moderate fncwae housing set aside fund. No direct assessment to any current land owner is proposed. Fees collected previously iron recent development are found to the Drainage Fund. Fees from currently developing properties and Fran future development will serve to reimburse the Drainage Fund for funding the proposed praJect. 7. U1MD USE AND PLANNING CDNSIDERATIDNS c) As noted a portion of ground through which the storm drain will traverse and drain is intended for development 6y the City as a Public Park site. The installation of this storm drain must be wnsi dared co d5515i rn sucn cevelopment. 8. TRANSPgtTATIQI a) A temporary increase in truck traffic will occur on Arrow Route, Feron Boulevard and Turner Avenue during the course of construction. These will be of short duration and will return to normal or pr es co nstructi on condition upon canpleti on of the proyect. b 6 e) Street drainage on Turner Avenue, Arrow Route and Feron Boulevard wT11 be improved, removing or undergrovnding normal nuisance waters flowing in and along these streets underground. As storm drain improvements are built north of Foothill Boulevard on Turner Avenue and Hermosa gvenue, the current installations will Drovide for the ultimate street drainage for Turner Avenue with the drainage area. ~'' lo) HEALTH SAFETY AND NUISANCE FACTORS e) A cor~sidera6le construction effort will occur to excavate the storm drain trench, install the storm drain and then backfill over the new pipeline. Canstructfon rroise will occur from such workings. Workings will he confined by standing ordinance free 6:00 a. m. to 7;00 p.m. yet nighttime maintenance of construction equipment should 6e anticipated. Normal mufflers for equipmend are required. The work will be of short duration and the noise generation will !>e temporary. 11 AESTHETICS c) The storm drain aligmment traverses through a greenbelt from north of Feron Boulevard to its northerly terminus south of Foothill Boulevard. The parkway is depressed to forma •VEE" channel. The pipeline will he buried older the grade of the old "YEE" channel. This is the economic section for wnstructing the system. The fnstaliatton will not degrade the appearance of the environmerd and will allow for the ultimate filling of the drainage Swale, but does not provide for the channel filling to occur. Full landscape reparations are provided for, yet the rhannel Swale will remain. Materials which are generated from the storm drain excavation could be used to reduce the depth of old channel but are directed for filling aver the storm drain south of Feron Boulevard. The intended fill provides additional storm grain protection in the sump point of the system as well as a fill to provide for the City's planned construction for the North Town Park. A significant import of material would be needed to reclaim the useful areas of the old earthen Swale. The responsibility to provide such filling would seen to go beyond providing storm drain protection for the community. Private parties have expressed a desire that the swales be filled tn. 12. UTILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES d d e) With the instaliatfon of the storm drain it is normal and common that sewer and waterlines will have to he rebuilt to go over and around the proposed installations. These are typically provided for as part of the construction. Where street and storm drain construction wfll occur together such as along Turner Avenue with the Turner Avenue storm drain laterals, such relocatTOr~s will occur to accomedate hoth street and storm drain constructions and may 5E deemed as a franchise obligation of the servicing utility. ~~~ h & i) Police and Fire protection requirements should not be increased but have the potential of being improved by the storm train imtallatton. The drainage hazard fs or will he partially removed from Turner Avenue where such street mold not 6e traversed by safety vehicles in mayor slam events due to the historic street flooding. k & 1) In Flmd Control Facilities and Xeighborhmd greenbelt greas, the open channels traditionally have had to be regraded foilowing mayor stones to repair gully erosion. The undergrounding aF the storm drain into a hardened pipeline will ellmtnate this traditional mafrKenance problem. The new pipeline will create new and offsetting maintenance requirements. In the total, a net reduction in maintenance effort and cost should be realized. (~ ~3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION GENERAL INITIAL STUDY -PART I Far all projects requiring enviromental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Camittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the initial Study and make recamiendations to Planning Coeraission. The Planning Caeaission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have na siggnificant environmental tiryact and a Negative Oeclaratton will be filed, (2) The Impact Report hwitl abe ipreparedt envt(3~aae An Ladd Lional~ nformation report should be supplied by the applicant giving further inTormsLion concerning the proposed project. Date f11ed:~ ~f ¢ r1~ / y~J Project Title: Area Vli flas ter Plan Storm Drain - Mainline System Phase II Applicant's Rome, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonoa, Enainearinc 932 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Nan. arn. Tel ~..A., .t a.. - T- °uc CJi,t'"~" ww - ~.eu' Concernf ng this Project: rBlane ~W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer (714) 909-1062. Ext. 32P ~~ Location of Project: Area VII Storm Drain will extend adjacent to Ffi~ Drive north of Placer Street to Feron Btvd. and from Feron Blvd. midway to Turner nve., goes south and bends east north of A.T.B S.F. Railroad towa rrs Mumbo ldt Ave. to the Deer Assessor's ., r . List other permits necessary fray local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: H4i1E W~~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use ar proposed protect: Installation of piaster Plan Storm Oran: within the plaster Plan Drainage Area VII, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Acreage of protect area and sguare footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Describe the environmental sett in of the proiect site including information on topography, so sta ty, pants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (atta~Ch n es r sheets): The Drainage Area V1I as noteu by the boundary of Foothill to tche ~orYth, Ramona to the hest, the A. ~~i way o e ou zt'F iidTPll21'-(AEl'AATS2T Avenue to the East. It %s noted to be nearly fully developed with existing single family residential development and also noted to exist is a major apartment comple and mobile home Dark. Storm drainage throughout the area has predominantly been in surface dmnnels within a green belt area bisecting the basin from North to mouth ending in mi open or undeveloped field just North of the Railv'ay West of _v ,,__ .a: r:.,.,_n .. n..,,d..n .il n. ~, rn M>in trrmt anA. Turner Avenue. Is the protect part of a larger protect, one of a series of cumulative act tons, which although individually small, may as a whale have significant environmental impact The project implementation is part of the City's pm ster Plan for Storm Drain Protection. The fns tallation does also allow the development of vacant properties north of the railway between Ramona and Turner Avenue. ~~~ I-2 PILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing no tse of produce vibration or glare? x- 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)t x 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designationst x 5. Remove any existing trees? Haw many2~_ ~ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of patent tally hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? _ ~ Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): Three fruit trees nest of Turner F.venue 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this pro,iect will generate dafly: Ii/H °• Eiti~Tutc ~ - iiw'nif2i Jf duty aliu uUl.e LP Ipf gCflCraGeU daily 0y Cnta pra,iect: ~`Temoara rv construction traffic only 25 truck trios oer day 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and Yillin9) required for this project, in cubic yards: Materials oisolaced 10.000 cubit yards 16. If the project lnvetves the construction of residential units, complete the form an the nett page. CERTIFIGTIOII: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may 6e required to Oe -Omitted Defore an adequate evaluation can be made f~~ihe Planning Division. Date: U/5/i17 Signa e T tie ~ nior Civi Engineer s ~~~ I-3 ~S ~i. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required t0 secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Protect: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single (amity units: 2. number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of Model/ and A of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Pr1ce Range 4~~ I-4 RESOLUTION N0. $7-~SQ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NE6ATIYE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED AREA VII STORM DRAIN - M1IINLINE NHEREAS, the Area YII Stores Drain - Mainline, as a Public Agency Project shall be subject to caarply with the California Environxntal Quality Act necessary to protect, rehabilitate and enhance the envtronxntal quality of the State; and MHEREAS, an Envlronxntal Assessxnt Initial Study has been prepared pursuant t0 the Cat ifornla Envt ronxntai quality Act, as axnded; and MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaagnga has for its consideration all the available inputs and has reviewed sax concerning the proposed Area VII Stores Drain Project, NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucaxnga does hereby resolved as follows: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaronga Hereby approves the Envirorweentai Assessxnt Initial StuQy and Issuance of a Nea_atlvr ueclarati on for the proposed Area VII Storm Drain Pro,j ect. Section 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Determination pursuant to the California Environxntal Quality Act. rl ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT ~~' ~~' o ~ ~~ DATE: August 19, 1987 '~ :> T0: City Council and City Manager try ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATIQi N0. 2J FOR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PARCEL MAP 10037 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RECOMIENOi1TI0N: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Anne nation No. 27 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Anne nation No. 27 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 and Parcel Map 10037. The developers of the subject projects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report 6y Resolution Na. 87-273. Respectfully suGnitted, ,Qu sse// Mn~~e+~r~ ~Y SX.;,<., ~< RHM:JA:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION N0. ~~~q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNEXATION N0. 27 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19, ANO PARCEL MAP 10037 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th day of ,luly, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-374 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 27 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-374 was duly and legally published in the time, fore and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the Lime, fora, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file Tn the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the lyrovements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 81-374, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mi1nA {n 1hn Hmo fn.w and mannnn of .eA h.. le c. ae .e., ..y• to appcare ..:„ -. the Affidavit of Mailing~on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of an~c o~ Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of Lhe work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in sa+d Resolution of Intention No. 87-374, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Repot filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a~- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e- pR ort are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent o 51' acts have been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District Na. 1 Annexation No. 27 for MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 and Parcel Map 10031 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is fn compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter L, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights Lo be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on Lhe lots directly abutting the street lights. Nork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to aii areaa in Lira Dialr i~l miu wal aimil ue ui viiieu uu a yes lot basis. In the case of condoms ni ums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lat. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement on the indfvidual development is hereby made a part of this report to the sane extent as if said plans and specifics were attached 'Hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the re pat r, removal ar replacement of all or any part of any improvement, pravTdfng for the i P umination of t^e subJect area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District Mo. 1 including Annexation No.27 is shown belay: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* Lamps YTD Annex No 27 New lamp Tat al 58001 444 0 444 9500E 446 D 446 22,000E 3 0 3 27,500E 14 __0 14 RHigh Pressure Sodium Vapor Lang Size Total Lamps Rate Mo's Total Annual Maint. Cost S BOOL 444 X f 8.93 X 12 f 41 579.04 9500E 446 X f10.16 X 12 , 54 316 32 22,000E 3 % f13.84 X 12 , . 498 24 27.500 is r e19 71 X 12 . • ~ L. p~L. VO Total gnnual Maintenance Cost E105,025.68 2. Costs per Unit: YTD Assessment Unit = 13,399; Assess. Unit this Annex = 55 Total 13,454 Total Annual Maintenance Cost f1056g f7.81/year/unit No. o n s n strict Assessment shall apply to each tot as explained fn Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Otagrans are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District Mo. 1", Annexation No. 27. these diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTIOY 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall 6e equal for each unit. Mhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each tot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SELTTOR 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adapts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers alt testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the Cfty Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the Ctty Council conducts a Wblic hearing and approves, or modifiez and approves the individual assessments. EXHIBIT °q• Properties and improvements to he included within Annexation Mo. 27 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Zone 1 (Residential) ttD assessment Units 13,399 Total Annual Maintenance Cost f105,025.68 Zone Z (Commercial Industrial) gRTE~C~C PROJECT III IT MDR 87_05 2 _ _ OR 86-19 16 _ _ PM 10037 37 _ _ 55 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 2 7 y`~E -, ~ ~: `' 1~{ s: ~;~ ~~ },~~! ;^ CITY OF BANCSO CUCA1[ONaA .c COiTNTY OF BAN B1~ANAZiDINO y ,3 BTATS of aAI.II+'OANU _ N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 2 7 f I .t ~ ~ ~ ~ ,..:r ,y, '~'f.G'' ..'M . ~ ~.. .. a _ _ _ w ~_ , -- , , - ---~:: ,.~;~~~:; crnr of aAxcao cucAl~coxaA ;~~, : ~~~' (70[INTY OF BAN BSBNAADINO V; ~~~" ~ STATE GF CALIIrORNL1- N im ~~; ~~~, "6~~ .~._- n ..~ . :~.,: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AIWE)cA770N NO. 27 '~\;. .. ~<, y , ~`1S ~i. \., O ~ b _ 1\ Z ~ D ~~ A~ ~~m ~' k v~ a ~'V. i~ 6~. ~^ ~.. ~.. ~~i ?~ ,tiG ~~f ~~~~.~ s~ CiTY OF RANC$O CUCA1tON0A . _,,,~ ~ = COUNTY OF 8AP1 BSRNARDINO ~, ``~'' ~ =: ~ ~ BTATS OF CALIIrORNTA ~, ,~ _ N im c. _. .:,~ ,:: ... / .C v~ r ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 i0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Jugy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide I~ 'C z u C O Y A I-,i ~ I2 C::'. i> 1977 SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NONK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 1 FOR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PARCEL MAP 10037 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 RECONEIpATIpI: It is recaa~ended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolutiongg ordering the work in No~n6 for MDRh87-OSXaOR 86N19 and ParceltMap 10037~iThendevelopersiof the subject projects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Resolution No. 87-375. Kespec ttully submitted, aQ..~wo..l~ +~7w~gs.,~! R v .~4:,,~„ ~ RHM:JA:dlw Attachments ~~ 6 RESOLUTION N0. g ~ ~{~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITN ANNEXATION N0. 1 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PARCEL MAP 10037 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th day of July, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-376 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-376 was duly and legally published in the time, force and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the thee, fora, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears frrom the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-376, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as aooears from the affidavit of Mafling on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of nc o ucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described 1n said Resoiution of Intention No. 87-316, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's eft port are hereby approved. SECTION 4: the assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent o sT aid tracts have been occupied. vtl, ~ a g CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGq Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. Annexation No. 1 for MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 and Parcel Map 10037 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of grticle 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the developments enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon said developments as well as on Che developments directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials far the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on unft Dasis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and sPeciffcations for street lighting have been prepared conditionseofpapprovaleforathe develogmentgand aseapprovedulbyethenCity Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subiect development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement an the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting Improvement construction. All improvements will be Constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as Indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 including Annexatlon No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamp Size* 5800E *Nigh Pressure Sodh total lamp size Lamps 5800E 3 Lamps Annex New Lamp ttD No. Total 3 0 3 ~ Vapor Total Annual Rate Mo's Maint. Cost X f 8.93 X 12 (320.40 Total Annual Maint. Cost 5320.40 2. Costs per dweliina Dntr~ YTD Assessment Unit 5.5; Assess. Units this Annex = 27.65 total 33.15 Total Annual Maintenance Cost = (320.40 = f9.67/year/unit un sin stnct -33T5 Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and Labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexatlon No. 1. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the tezt of this report. SECTICM 6. gssessment Ingrovements for the Distrtct are found to be of general benefit to all duelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each let or parcel shall be proportional to the nunber of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTIOA 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets Dublic hearing date. 3. City Council conducts Wblic hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the praceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public Rearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. (~ 3 a EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: PROJECT ACREAGE 5800E MDR 87-05 1.10 0 DR 86-19 8.00 0 PM 10037 18.55 0 27.65 0 ~ 33 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. 1 5/TE _ . _ ~_.~ .,. ® 9. ®: 9 3 ® w ® luau. '~'wrt .a.r n~ ~~ o.~ ; crrY of ~,rrcao cucAxoxoA }~~~~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO Y %~.. S c!. rim y: °~` ~ STAT$ OF CALffORNIA im ~: .~ ,~ i ©" .: ~~ ^' I~. n N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGFITING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. 1 r ,, ~: ~~, ~ I n; ' ~ e,'.::; . ...., ~~... W 2 _ W ~ _ Q / _ _ _ _ 2 ~.• \\\ .~~~\~ S \~\:: ~?~\x. ~~ - J:.. I i ~~%`~fl crr~r of aAxcHO CucA~oxaA ,;,,.~ covxTSr of sAx ~xAanwo y; •~ BTATB OF CALIIrOItMA, .~ _N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. 1 ~ r ei.,... r r _ i~ ,e ?~`~! ; CT1R OF RANCHO CtTCAI[ONOA ~7'-''~ ~ ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BSRNARDINO ~;- ;3 8TAT8 of cALIIrORNIA N ~; ~= CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 rs a`~' ~'~ T0: City Council and City Manager 19i' FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNE%ATION N0. 4 FUR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PARCEL IMP 10037 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRIC7 NO. 3 RECOMENDIITIBM: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 4 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation Na. 4 to Landscape Maintenance Dtstrict No. 3 for IwDR 81-05, OR 86-19 and Parcel Map 10037. The developers of the subJect protects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Rsclution No. 87-371. RESOLUTION N0. ~~ _ ~~1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 4 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR MDR 87-05, DR 86-19 AND PARCEL MAP 10037 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th day of Uuly, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-372 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 4 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-372 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in Lhe office of the Ctty Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the"passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement was duly and legally posted in the time, form. manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Cierk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning rear property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-372, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing ar as known to the City Clerk of the Cify of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form. and manner as required by law, as appears from Lire ..ffida:it ^f wadi na on file in the office of the Ctty Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of ncho ucamonga Lhat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resoluticn of Intention No. 87-372, be done and made; and SECTION 2: 9e it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer .sT hereby finally aDProved; and SECTION 3: 8e tt further resolved that the assessments and method o asf sessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: de it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unli'ra{ter 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. ~G3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDIIGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ANNEXATION ND. 4 for MDR 87-05, OR 86-19 and Parcel Map 10031 SECTI DN 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972), SECTION 2. General Description This Cfty Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within MDR 87-05, OR 86_19 and Parcel Map 10037 as Weil as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-af-way or easenents to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Pions and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the condittans of approval for the development and as approved by the City a~„~~eery-~ pi;i;;p,;, 3ef_rcrcc i,c,euy made to the suD,lect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f. 30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment w1i1 be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 4 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No_4 Total Total estimated annual Maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment acres 380,371.86 27.65 380,399.51 Total cost t assessment 0 Xf.3p • s0/year 0/mo unit for year and month 3 l . Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an actfve homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTIgI 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram fs hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the Distrfct and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there is more than moo ~oill"~ .,,,i. _ lct __ land, the assessment for each lot or "~ pa. a. ~T a~eem gale number of dwellin units Darcel shall be proportional to the g per lot or parcel. The City Council wilt hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer s Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearfng, considers all testimony and determines to gnnex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. v~ Properties and inprovelaents to be included within Annexation No. 4 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3; Properties Protect Acres MDR 8]-05 1.10 DR 86-19 8.00 PM 10037 18.55 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ,3 ANNEXATION N0. 4 51~~ Y „ , .~ t b~ ® ~ ®/ e t ® 11~'M~. ~A 1411YRI ~W~[ MK kf 1 ® T 1 ,~~ NP$MIgE ----$ ~1 W ~~ 2 ' _,~~: ~.~.~-----•r` ~r © , i iff4 ,tl y ~~ 1~5 ~~ . #%_ ~~c CITY OF RANCHO CUCA>viOl~1CA ~ MDR 87 O.' ~~~"_-'~ ;z ENCVICeNITY M PISION ~ T im 11\,11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, ,3 ANNEXATION N0. ~} t~`'~`~'~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIOI~ICA .~`% ' ~, >s ENGINEERING DIVISION C~ ~ 13 VICINITY MAP ~m n N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, ,3 ANNEXATION N0, 4 L. 1` ' <i~ T •,h ~ ~ c M~my~ 4 i `~ ~ I!, ~cMp " ZY ~ l~ ~ `.'~w ~ ~ ' ~Pa .r I I ~ ` / , • M 1 (V (. ~ ~ K11~ a 2GV OJ . I ~t C, t~~~ ~.~~l.~; ~,~ CITY OF RANCHO CllGU~tONGA ~ PM I ~~~7 i _~ ~, EN4INEERING DIVISION `'I ~ VICINITY MAP 1 ifn ~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA `~syo~ STAFF REPORT ~~' '~ c'l '3 F ~ L ~I> 19ii -- DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: VEHICLE STORAGE - 6006 KLUSMAN - INVESTIGATION STATUS ABSTRACT: At the August 5, 1987 City Council meeting, the Council requ~e~' a report on investigation Status for vehicle storage at 6006 Klusman. TMs came as a result of public comments directed to the Council expressing deep concern about this situation and requesting that steps be taken to eliminate this problem. The following report outlines the action taken by staff in response to citizen complaints. A chronology of events is followed by excerpts from relevant Code sections and their application to this situation. The review of this matter by the City Council may prompt direction to staff to consider amending the Development Code as it relates to vehicle storage. II. CHRONOLOGY: On August 3, 1987, Code Enforcement received three reques s and a referral from the Foothill Fire District regarding the accumulation of vehicles at 6006 Klusman. It was reported that the new owner of the property, who had begun to move in over the weekend, had brought in approximately 15 cars and was storing them in the rear yard. The owners of the property, Mr. Nelson Start and Ms. Susan Johnson, were contacted and an inspection was conducted on August 3, 1987. Approximately fifteen cars were observed parked in the rear yard and Mr. Start said that a total of 30 cars would be brought to the property. The cars ranged in condition from completely operational to being extensively dismantled, Discussion with the ewners centered around the intended use of the property and City requirements for vehicle storage. Mr. Start said that ail the vehicles were his own personal property and that he intended to either restore or use parts from all the vehicles. He indicated that screening the vehicles from view was part of his plans and he intended to use extensive Landscaping in the rear yard area to provide screening. (a ~S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Vehicle Storage - 6006 Klusman August 19, 1987 Page 2 The owners were told by Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor, that the situation was somewhat unusual due to the quantity of cars being stored. It was made clear that the storage of inoperative vehicles was regulated by City ordinance and that the extent to xhich this use of the property would affect their neighbors would require additional review. They were told that, at the very minimum, it Mould be necessary to provide screening in all directions with a combination of walls and landscaping. Subsequent discussion with the adjacent property owners identified specific concerns with regard to vehicle storage. Although City Ordinance does not expressly prohibit vehicle storage, the neighbors were told that the City would make all efforts to eliminate potential hazards and maintain aesthetic conditions. Further, the neighboring residents were advised that the current situation was a violation of City Code, and that the City would seek corrective action. The discussion between Richard Alcorn and the neighboring residents concluded with an agreement to keep them informed of any further developments. After a review of this matter has been completed, and a plan of action formulated, the specific details will oe provided for their information. •~.• iriTi.nini.Tili iVri OF Tri[ I'111 i11b lpllL I.UUL: Ine rol towing excerpts from t e eve opmen o e an ar rng rdinance which relate to this issue and are accompanied by staff's interpretation as to their intent. Section 17.08.070 of the Development Code deals with some general development and maintenance provisions for residential districts. Section 17.08.070 8. Property Maintenance. Ali buildings, structures, yards and otrie~agroreaen s s 11 be ~aintafned in a Honer xhich does not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are prohibited: 3. Abarwloned, discarded or unused objects or equipment, wch as automobiles, wtomobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or similar items. Staff Camnents: There is no provision within this section or the Municipal Code which defines "abandoned, discarded, or unused" beyond their common usage. This section is comaonly used when overall ~4° CITY COUNCIL STAfF NEPORT Vehicle Storage -6006 Klusman August 19, 1987 Page 3 conditions on a property include these or similar situations creating a lack of general maintenance. A use which occurs on residential property can include many things. Pools, tennis courts, horses, stables, gardens and vehicle storage are only a few. Mhen maintenance of property is assessed, the extent of land use will determine the acceptable level. The more intensely a property is used, the higher the degree of care, or maintenance, is required, In this case, vehicle storage will require that the vehicles themselves must be a part of the overall maintenance program. Enforcement action to eliminate vehicle storage using these provisions is subjective. The Code does not prohibit vehicle storage, but it does identify the need to blend this use into a residential area. The coMitions on the subject property are addressed more specifically by the latter part of this section which does deal specifically with vehicle repair and storage, and does specify mitigation measures as follows: Section 17.08.070 8. Vehicle and~E9ui nt Repair and Storage. The following prowsf-ons slia~l app yl-b a~i3Te-~ vehicle, camxr. camper trailer, trailer, un•ounted coyer, trailer coach, motorcycle, boat or similar conveyance in all residential distracts, and to all sites in aqy other district used for residential occupancy: 1. Servicing, repairing, assembling, disassembling, wrecking, modifying, restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall De prohibited unless conducted within a garage or accessory budding, or in an area screened frw view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, pll, or equivalent careening. Storing, placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part thereof, which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, inoperative, or from which an essential or legally required operating part is removed, shall be prohibited unless conducted with a garage or accessory building, or fn an area careened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally lc~.:ated fence, wll, or equivalent screening. lp~~ CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT Vehicle Storage - 6006 Klusman August 19, 1987 Page 4 Staff Comments: In essence, this entire section regulates, but does not prohibit vehicle storage. Further, the view from an adjoining lot is not specific, it may, but does not usually, mean from elevated structures. Another aspect of regulation comes from Section 11.12 of the Development Code. This section includes parking design and minimum space allocations. The parking of vehicles on residential property is governed by these parking regulations. It has been interpreted that vehlcles are to be parked on pavement, especially in yard areas within public view. This interpretation stems from the inclusion of a description of paving materials whenever parking areas are described. Section 17.12.030 B. Residential: The following design standards shall apply to e rest en tai districts and developments. 8. All recreational vehicle parking and/or storage areas located within the front yard setback shall be paved with either asphaltic concrete, cement, gravel or crushed rmCk. 10.64.020 Permitted parking area for oversize vehicles. A. Oversize vehicles may be parked or stored on private property in ail yard areas except the required front yard setback on any side yard abutting a street right-of-way, or as otherwise restricted by City Ordinance. Semi-trailers, camp trailers, campers and/or house cars may be parked on the driveway or on an apron in the front yard setback located between the driveway and the side property line closest to the driveway if: 1. The trailer or vehicle does not project over any property tine; 2. The parking or storage area Ms a paved or graveled wrface; and 3. The area around said trailers and vehicles is kept clean and free of trash, debris and/or parts. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Vehicle Storage - 6006 Klusman August 19, 1987 Page 5 Staff Comments: These two sections show an intent to require a paved area for vehicle parking. Though we do not specify areas of the rear yard in these sections, there is a relationship established with regard to paving and parking areas. It has been interpreted that any area where vehicles park can be considered a "parking area". Section 17.12.030 Design Standards: Design Standards are established by this secf~-~t~asic ninimur dinensions and guidelines for design, construction, and maintenance of parking within both the residential and comrercial districts. A. General: The following standards shall apply to bath the res en ial and commercial districts. 5. Paving: Parting and lording facilities shall be wrfaced and nintalned rith asphaltic, concrete, or other pernnent, im;rrriaus wrfacing material wfficient to prevent mud, dust, loose nterial, and other nuisances. Alternau wrf:ce aaterial can be considered by the City Planner, if shorn that such rtertal rill not cause amerse errects one roar n n u remain rn a usaoie condition. Staff Comments: The above section shows that design standards for parking areas require permanent paving material, or approved alternate materials. The coaposite of these sections, and interpretations, concludes that parking a vehicle creates a parking area, and paving of that area can then be required. New parking ordinances under review by the City Attorney's office have taken this premise and sought to provide improved enforcement ability. These new sections are designed to identify the vehicle as being parked in violation as opposed tq a faSlure to provide property improvements. This follows the belief in the intent of our Ordinance that paved parking areas are a requirement. If we identify the existence of a parking area, we can then require its construction in accordance with City stardards. (Qc~9 CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT Yehicle Storage - 6006 Klusman August 19, 1987 Page 6 Section 17.12.010 Purpose and 6enerai Plan Consistency A. These regulations are established in order to assure that parking facilities are properly designed and located in order to meet the parking needs created by specific uses, and ensure their usefuiness, protect the public safety, and, where appropriate, buffer and transition surrounding land uses fron their iapac t, Section 17.12.020 Basic Regulations for Off-Street Parking A. Off-street parking shall be provided subject to the provfsfons of this Chapter for: 3. Aqy addition or enlargeawrt of an existing building or use; and, 4. Mly change In the occupancy of any building or the canner in rhich any use is conducted that would result in additional parking spaces being rcgpi red. G. Parking facilities constructed or substantially reconstructed subsequent to the effective date of Lhis chapter, rhether or not required, shall conform to the design standards set forth in tms cnapter. Staff Comment: Utilization of parking standards are reasonable and will have an effect on this si tuatt on. IV. APPLICATION OF CODE TO EFFECT COMPLIANCE: The use of the current code toward the abatement of vehicle storage on the subject property does not identify the storage as a violation. Interpretation of Cade Sections can, however, severely regulate this use and mitigate the impact an su rrou ndi rig properties. *Section 17.08.070-8 -- can require that the yard area where the cars are s re s a be kept well naintatned, neat and orderly. *Section 17.12.010, 020 030 -- can require that the need for a Iona par ing, w e er or not they are required spaces, must be provided within paved parking areas of an approved material and overall design. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Vehicle Storage - 6006 Klusman August 19, 1987 Page 7 V. CONCLUSION: Current Code provisions do not clearly prohibit Lhe par i~~c ng or storage of vehicles on residential property. Certain conditions have been identified as Tnlurious to a residential use and attempts have been made to provide mitigating restrictions. It is clear, however, that the interpretation of existing Codes has been directed at eliminating vehicle nuisances from property within the City. The reasonabie use of a residential lot must be perslitted while identifying and prohibiting conditions which will harm Lhe aesthetics of the community. This situation can be divided into three distinct violations: 1. The parking and storage of unlicensed, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative vehicles on private property within public view. 2. The repair, modification or reconstruction of a vehicle within public view, 3. Parking and storage of any vehicle within a visable yard area requires that the "Parking Area" shall be of an approved paved surface. The successful abatement of this vehicle storage problem can be auurneaeu usi ny wrre n[ reguiati ons. Ine most oroae regulatory provision results by identifying the yard area as a vehicle parking lot. Section 17.06.020 of the Development Code requires a Minor Development Review to this instance: Section 17.06.020 Minor Development Review Pur ose and Intent. The purpose and intent of the Minor oilmen ev ew process is to provide for the Administrative review of pro,iects whichp because of their limited size and scope, have minor aesthetic, land use, or traffic implications and do not create any significant impact on public utilities or services. The Minor Oevelopnent Rerter prauss is to assure that such limited protects coaply with all applicable City standards aid ordinances, and are not detrf~ental to the public health, safety, or relfaro, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the imediate vicinity. ~ S/ CITY LW NC IL STAFF REPORT Vehicle Storage - 6006 Klusman August 19, 1987 Page 8 C. Projects Requiring Minor Development Review. Ali app cans for nor eve opnen eview are required for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional projects which qy or m;y not involve the isswnce of a building permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure which Heels the following criteria: 3. Mew construction, expansion, or significant reconstruction of parking lots. F. Findings. The City Planner shall make the following findings eti fare granting approval of a Minor Development Review application: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental W the public health, safety, or relfaro, or raterially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed project is in compliance with each of cne appi icaole provisions or cne uevelopmenc t,oae. 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. Asa result, the resident can be required to submit an application for a Minor Development Review. The use of the property can 6e studied and the intent of the Code applies. Reasonable conditions can 6e imposed on this project which will prevent detrimental effects on surrounding properties. It is reasonable to apply these provisions in this case because: A. A violation does exist on the property for which corrective action is required and must be verified. B. The use of the property regarding vehicle storage is much more intense than similar parking within the same residential area. C. The application of overall regulations can best be met by a careful review of this specific situation, especially in 1ighL of other proposed ordinance changes which may be occurring in the future and follow a similar interprettion of City Code. / 7 S~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Vehicle Storage -6006 Kluswn August 19, 1987 Page 9 If the City Council finds that the Tntent of City Cade is to prohibit the storage of vehicles within yard areas, and that paved parking areas shall be required for vehicle parking, then staff should be directed to amend the Devetoprent Code to clarify this intent. Respectfully subaitted: ra Bu11 City P1 ner BB:RLA:nas ~ S3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Oat e: August 19, 1987 To: City Manager and City Council Fran: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: B1 one W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: Right-of-May Acquisition for the Area VII Storm Drain RECOMlEN04TI0!1: c~`~^Mo f~ ~~'n ~~ h ,.I iz ~' ~ Ilia 19ii It is hereby recommended that staff be directed to proceed with Eminent Domain action to acquire easements across Assessor's Parcel Nos. 209-085- 16, 209-085-17 and 209-085-12 to provide right-of-way for the construction of the Area VII Storm Drain. 811CK6ROIND/ANIILYS IS: In December of 1986, Staff received direction pertaining to design and construction of the Area VII or Lower Turner Master Plan Storm Drain. The direction to proceed with such design and construction being required to provide storm drain protection for the North Town Park proposed to be located west of Turner Avenue and south of Feron Boulevard. In the early Hydrology and Storm Drain Alignment investigations, it was found necessary to provide storm drain piping directly into the area south of Feron Boulevard, west of Turner Avenue, as such area was found to be the law or sump point within the Area VII drainage basin. The alignment studies indicated that the economic ali grment to serve the area could be made by routing the mainline storm drain directly into or through this area. Rn alternate to this was to provide a malor storm drain lateral through the same area. The first alternative is noted as the least costly alignment with virtually the same impact to the three subject parcels with either alternative. Such impact being noted as traversing the three private properties or to closely skirt the three parcels in a longitudinal encroachment into the ,q ,r. g c,c, Railroad corridor south of the three parcels. Contacts with the railroad indicated that a minimum one (1) year waiting period is typical for a grant of railroad license with grants for longitudinal encroachments such as the one proposed being rarely granted. The same Railroad representatives discouraged our pursuit a~ probably being unsuccessful. ~ S'S~ STAFF REPORT Re: Area VII Storm Drain August 19, 1967 Page 2 Due to the cost savings fran other alignments studs ed and the severe time restraints to acquire a railroad license, if at all possible. A purchased "right-of-way" through the rear yards of the three private parcels was indicated as the preferred and economic aligrment. In pursuing this alignment alternative, a real property appraisal was acquired thraugh the firm of J. Milli am Murphy and Associates of Pamon a. The appraisals indicate "land values" to be worth E1.25 a square foot for the subiect area. The appraisal also recommended a discounting of such value 60% where an easement only was to be acquired. Estimates for removal or loss of improvements were also estimated in addition to the land value. Upon receipt of such appraisal and at the request of the three property owners, afield meeting was set and the results of the appraisal were taken to the three owners. The initial offer in the amount of 5500 or 60% of 51.25 per square foot for an eas anent area of 20 feet 6y 50 feet was rejected by alt three arners at the field meeting. R counter offer by Mr. Sanchez, which came as a staff suggestion for consideration, was for a total buy out of his vacant parcel considering such as being possibly un bu ilda ble due to current building code requirements. He made a request to staff of 512,000 for such a sale which exceeded the appraisal amount. At the direction of the City Engineer, a detailed study of his lot was made resulting in a determination that his lot was indeed buildable. The impact of the intended easement also fell within the normal rear yard set back, meaning he was already restricted f ram building structures on much of the eas anent area. The proposed e as anent did infringe primarily upon subsurface usage of the parcel, such as a swiming pool or spa instal iation. Due to his higher Lhan appraisal request for fuil sale and the fact that his lot does ran aim buildable, the counter offer was not acceptable to staff. Our last att anpt at ac quisi tian has been to offer for an eas anent nnl y, thr full estimated land value or the full 51.25 a square foot plus the value of improvements lost or normal damages. This amounted to 51,250 for the easement plus an amount for iost fmpravements or damages. The last offer requested response by July 31, 1987 whereafter an assumption of dental was to be made. It is noted that the offers made are based on a fair market appraisal upon estimates prepared by an independent and banded appraiser and such appraisals are ready for use in an Eminent Oanain or court action to ac quire such right-of-way, should the occasion arise. lp SJ STAFF REPDRT Re: Area VII Storm Drain August 19, 1987 Page 3 Staff has received no further counter offer to date with the indication that cane will be made. Without an apparent alternate to an alignment where storm drainage protection can be provided to the three subiect parcels, the proposed Nerth Tarn Park site and the areas west thereraf, Staff recamnends that Eminent Danain be used to acquire the needed right-of-way for the proposed protect. It is also recommended that as such action proceeds, that the Ctty renafn receptive to courKer proposal by any or all of the three parties in an atteept to negotiate an amicable settlement. Respectfully submitted, BWF:pam (O ~~ RESOLUTION N0. '+~ ~ T~ f/ A RESq.UTICM OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GILIFORNIA, STATING INTENT TO ACQUIRE REAL PROPERTY FOR THE AREA VII STORM DRAIN BY EMINENT DOM4[N PROCEEDINGS SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 MHEREAS,the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to construct the area VII storm drain serving drainage area VII of the master plan of stone drains, such area noted as being bounded by Foothill Avenue at the north the Atchison 6 Topeka and Santa Fe railroad on the south, Ramona Avenue on the west and Turner Avenue on the west. MiEREAS, the storm drain construction will require the crossing of three private parcels identified as Assessor's Parcels Nos. 209-085-16, 209-085-17 and 209-085-12. MFIEREAS, attempts by the City to acquire easements by purchase offer have been rejected by the owners of this noted parcels. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the virtue o9 the power vested in the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that: 1. Easements across the before mentioned parcels shall be acquired by an action of eminerK domain. 2. A public hearing shall be set for the regular City Council meeting of September 2, 1987, to hear alt comments or protests to the proposed action of Eminent Danain. 3. Owner of the affected parcels shall be notified in writing and by public posting of the irftended action and protest hearing. ~~J ~ nrmv nn n ~ unvn nirn w un~rn STAFF REPORT DATE: August 19, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Asst. Civil Engineer ~p Lw.,.,V,~ ~~c 7 r ~~: ~. ~ , 1977 SUBJECT; Acquisition of a modified corner cutoff from the property on the northwest corner of Baker Avenue and Arrow Route owned by William and Maur andia Clayton. The modified corner cutoff is required to complete street improvements at the Baker Avenue and Arrow Route intersection in cordunction with the Baker-Arrow Storm Drain and Street Improvement. Project RECOMMENg1T101: At the present time, staff recommends that temporary improvements be constructed around the right-of-way restriction at the northwest corner of Baker Avenue and Arrow Route and go with an Eminent Domain action for the total frontage right-of-way when the next phase of Arrow Route Reconstruction from Baker Avenue to Grove Avenue begins. The design of this phase is due to begin in February of 1968. 8a ckgroun d/Analysis On July 15, 1987, a letter was sent to William and Maurandia Clayton with a copy of the Appraisal Report on their property located at 8488 Arrow Route. An offer of purchase in an amount of (276.00 to acquire sufficient right-of-way to construct curb and gutter on the Northwest corner of Baker Avenue and Arrow Route. This acquisition of aDProximately 92 square feet is required to complete the intended improvements in conjunction with the City's current Capital Improvement project for Baker Avenue and Arrow Route. On Friday, Juiy 25, 1987, Mr. Clayton came into the City with regards to the purchase of the noted right-of-way. His response to the offer was "NO", s±ating that he felt the offer was insufficient, He also expresseC reluctance to any grant or sale of right-of-way, now or in the future. At this time, staff feels that there are two alternatives: 1, gcquire the right-of-way for the curb return t~irough Eminent Domain and construct the curbs and gutters at the intersection as presently proposed. ~S~ STAFF REPGRT Re: Baker Ave. 6 Arrow Route August 19, 1981 Page 2 2. Construct a temporary curb return around the right-of-way restriction far the present. It is noted that during the current fiscal year, plans will be prepared for improving Arrow Route from Baker Avenue to Grove Avenue, and that for such improvements a full frontage dedication will be required from Mr. & Mrs. Clayton. Due to the Clayton's expressed reluctance, an Emi pant Domain action will be required for this additional acquistion. The tenpoary curb return would allow for all right-of-way to be acquired at onetime in one action and not two actions. It is therefore staff's recommendation that temporary improvements he constructed at the Northwest corner of Baker Avenue and Arrow Route mid that full right-af-way for the ultimate street widening be squired through Eminent Domain during the next phase of Arrow Route Improvement. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~, a .,~:e~ 11 ,u..,_...-~ -~ ~ RHM:LEH:jh (~59 i II ~~i ~~ v J ~ 1 Jl I 1 ~~, ~~ _ ~, William& Ma.rand'aClayton~~ _~°S~ I //~ ~~ 22~ ~ I I. 207-591-29 I I I ~ w ~ e ~LITLIRE Ri6HT-OF-WAY ~~.. _ _ .~ w EXISTING R'~C.t1T OF-WAY rRO FO SED L~GOICA'~IICN ~ I -~_ a L_--- i I • i ~?^.,~1D ~L d- C'~:sS E-`.u ~.C2 C'' N. M M; j ,r- ~ AP.ROW ROtiTE I~ I ~~~ 1~7i {31 }~ EBC giSEi3/PLA:i;iE23 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: August 19, 1987 To: City Manager and City Council Fran: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer By: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer c ~~ ~ ~ 4 O z a. Z Fi; UI, uD 1977 Subject: Milliken Avenue Grade Separation -Report of P.U.C. Hearing for Grade Separation Grant and Solicitation of Design Oirection Pertaining to the Choice of Under or Over Crossing Project RE001lENDATI01: Staff recommends the change fran an Undermossing to an Overcrossing to allow for potential of grant funding. Design and landscaping far such a design change shall be augmented to ensure compat ability with the environment. BACK6ROUII D/AM LTS I5 On April 7, 1987, the firm of Deleuw Cather, under the direction of the City Engineer, presented to the Public Utilities Camnissimn at its annual _.• r-. A.. C..n....l tnn~ into rif.de nnl lraf inn fm~ a l:nanf lieu( iiiy5 vii ~'~_...... ~ ..~ ..p... ' to Fund then Milliken Avenue Grader Separation. Mr. Robert Barton will report mn the outcome of the hearings and the potential for receivfng of a Grade Separation Grant. Due to the low potential for funding of an Undercrossing project, it is forseen that should the City pursue such a project that all costs will of necessity have to be funded by the City with grant assistance doubtful. Mr. Barton will present a scenario upon which the City's potential for an initial or reimbursing Grade Separation Grant might be received and also where by virtue of staged construction of an Overcrossing, a second Grant to widen an existing bridge can be considered with a good potential for a Grant assistance. The scenario presented by Mr. Barton proposes a change from an under to an overcrossing project with staged construction. l0/ / STAFF REPORT Re: Milliken Avenue Grade Separation August 19, 1987 Page 2 Staff reconmmendation for the change is based primarily upon financta! incentive. It is estimated Tn the Oeleuw Cather report that costs for an Undercrossing protect amount to f4.1 million dollars which must 6e born by the City in their entirety. The costs for an Overcrossing at 4 Lanes, amounts to an estimate 53.3 million with potential for a 50L grant participation for an initial or reimbursement grant from the Grade Separation Fund for such expenditure. The costs to widen such structure to six lane are roughly estimated at (215,000. Such work when traffic counts merit the additional lanes, have the potential for an BOR Grade Separation Fund participation. The total potential for grant funding by changing to the less costly protect is estimated at f1,B22,000. This is in addition Lo the estimated 1550,000 being saved from the overall cost of the protect. tt is our belief that with Lhe potential savings to be had by the City that much can be done to beautify or enhance the appearance of the overcrossing protect through intensified landscapings. SPECIAL NOTATION: The change in protect concept was presented to Lhe Planning Commission on July 8, 1987. It is to be noted that the concept of an Overcrossing was not disapproved by the Planning Commission. The primary concern of the Planning Commission being for Lhe esthetics of an Overcrossing verses an Undercrossing protect. Staff respects the opinion of the Planning Commission and agrees in concept that an Overcrossing, is a more highly visa6le structure, and poses the potential of being esinetlcal ly less ne5l table. 1t 1s or would not De our normal practice fA disregard the Planning Commissions recommendation. Ne would desire that the Council weigh all aspects of the impact of such a decision before giving Staff direction this evening to proceed with an Over or Undercrossing. we have this evening, renderings for both design concepts for your review. These were not available for the Planning Commission meeting and are viewed this evening for the first time. Should the Council uphold Staffs recommendation, it is proposed that such renderings be returned to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendations pertaining to the landscaping. .R,e~spe'c, tpfully submi tted,• ,1,~ Attachmen~y~ ~~a ~~~ V(~ll V1\Vf1 STAFF REPORT ~~'G ~ ,. ~' i 0 F V 1977 DATE: August 79, 1967 ~' TU: Mayor and City Counc ilmembers FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution Urging Approval of Measure "A" on the November 19, 1987 Ballot RECOMMENDRTIDN: City Council approval of Resolution urging approval of Measure "A" on the November 19, 1987 ballot, which implements an additional one-half cent sales tax to be utilized for traffic improvement needs. BACKGROUND: The San Be rna rd lno bounty Board or Supe,vi au,a u.. A~ydst ~, 1"O7 approved the attached Resolution No. 87-283 piacing Lhe transportation sales Lax measure on the November 1987 ballot, The SANBAG Board has approved the at- tached ordinance and expenditure plan, which is Lhe formal question Lo go be- fore the voters, Additionally approved at the SANBAG meeting was the first five-year arterial program, which is also attached. At this Lime, it would be appropriate for the City Council to consider taking a formal position on Lhe ballot measure. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. RAR :baa of tarh, (p ~ 3 RESOLUTION N0. 87-~'2' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING APPROVAL FOR MEASURE A, A COUNTY-WIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, congestion is rapidly growing and without an adequate highway net- work, we will see gridlock conditions such as exist in Orange and Los Angeles Counties; and WHEREAS, a sound transportation system which keeps pace wf th growth is vi- tal to securing new jobs for our residents, thereby reducing long commutes; and WHEREAS, our local city and county streets are in great need of additional revenue for rehabilitation and new construction since current gasoline taxes are consumed by roadway maintenance costs; and MHERERS, state and federal gasoline taxes and other transportation revenues are, and will continue to be, inadequate to meet our state highway construction needs, even though we continue to receive our equitable share of those funds; and WHEREAS, the state is encouraging counties to adopt transportation revenues of their own, and is fncrea singly rewarding those counties who have done so; and NHEREAS, three counties (Santa Clara, Alemeda, and Fresno) have adopted such mea su rzs, and others are planning to do so; and WHEREAS, a one-half cent sales tax fora period of 15 years, to be spent on a voter-approved program of projects, appears to be the most fair and produc- tive method of local funding; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors have initiated Measure "A" leading to a public vote for such transpo nation needs. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL does hereby resolve to take a position of support for the proposed county-Wide transportation improve- ment pros ram to 6e funded from Measure "A" on the November ballot. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 1981. ~ ~~u Exhibit F. r,_ 1- „', 14 II .E '8 ,. ~c _r R.SCLUTiCN NO. 67-253 A P.ESOLL'TION OF T&E HOARD CF SUPERVi SCRS OF TF.E COUh_Y OF BAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALI,i NG, AT THE REQUEST OF THE SA.N BER'7P?L7IN0 COU:.;" TRANSPORTATION COt±^?i SS ION, A SPECIAL ELECTION m0 BE CONSOLIDATE.."` WITA THE VARIOL`S ELECT?015 TO BE CONDUCTED ON NOV?^^.BER 3 1987 FOR '^HE PURPOSE CF BuB!~:ITTING TO THE ELECTORS OF S7~`J 3EF_':A ti•iNG CGU'..:Y A N,EASURE SEEKiNv AUTHORZ ZATION OF A R°_TAIL TRA_NSACTiONH P\'J USE '"AX =_Y SAID COM_`9i SSION, DEDICATED TO TP,A5SPORTATION I!!P.°.CVE"fENTS, FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BONDS PAi"r.BLE SOLELY FROM THE FROCEEDS OF T'r~?T TAX A.\^J TO ESTABLISH P1 APPRUPRIATIONB Li N.iT FOR THE CC"_"ISS ION. Oa 9londav, Aucst 3 1987, on motion of S'ape^+isor Ricrcaa duly seconded by Supe: vi sor >+kes ar.3 carried, the fol_cM~ir.c resolution is adopted: iii:. °AB, the Btate Leci s'_at u:e hzs enzcted tY.e "Fa^ 3erna^.^.1 .^.C C:OL'ntV Tre.^.cpn{`tfi nn .Ctl ec ^tx Frt" vith nP•ttin ._r._te~ tax actior: tV, su:^j ect to ecter app: ovalr and D~r.E REAS, tie Sa^ Se: ^ar dom..., ..ocnty Transportation __rr..i s=: cr. and t.,e xarc c: Buoer vi=_crs c? tie Cocnty cf Ear: ~erczrdi r.c a a...:;cri cod b said Act to conduct as election __c ..._ _.c Pose c_ ___c,__`_i^e a a=1nt prcpesi ci o.^. to the voters ___._ _ ___:._r__z _.,,,. tc _-_ se z _'2 ,=_ .8 retzil _ransactions .r._ _se cam,. _...: e:._ .or ?,i ghha: tear.spc:taci cn pnrpos es and to _- .. -.. _ ..:e .. ..c .:-.e _ cceecs c'_ ...a_ tz x: and ~'EF.S, tie ~t.~ 3ernardi nc Couaty ^. ransportati cn __c-_. _. _n _, _r ._..~..ce ::c. A _ =ted ,'•ul .?, i98i aad .._:_..__-- .,.. c.-, adep`_ed _. ~9, :987 ias ecuested the 9ozrd . _ _ , _.. _ _:_ -. ..::^.e Cc'.:r.t_ cc S?^ ?err:zrdi -o to cai_ such e.•.: cc. cnr a:.~ ~ !__ 'I E G '. '~ ,, U ' hi?ERE?,5, a countywide eleccica will be held on _ '- tiove_ber 3, 198?; . ~ 1Ch, TEEHE?CRE, EE __ RESCLJSEC by the Bozrd oP 5 Soper vis c:s o£ Dhe County c° San ce:nardino that the measure 6 'll hereinafter set Pert': in fu'_1 ae s•.:bc_tted to the vct ors o£ the - ~, Cc'uaty of San 3ernardi.^.c at z s?e ci al e'_ecti o.-, to be held and E "II conducted on tiovember 3, 1987, said special election to be 9 ~~I consolidated with the other elections to be held en the same 10 ~ date, and that the Cotmty Recistra: of Voters be directed to ,; ", DL`bli5l suc*. neti ce as aay be recuired by law `or the time and in I. '~, tae az.;.^.er so recuired, znd to place the same on the ballot at ,_ the eiecti on ".O be held COL`..^.t ye•i de or. Kovember 3, 1987. '- ~I 14 ~I The ?repcs ed measure shall appear u?oa the ballet =_ubstantially 15 .I as follows: s= i_ r`z x?=: IE ~~~ rc: the purpose o_ relieving traffic concession, meeting r _~ ,, .highway ^eeds, increasi r.c safety, and imezovine air ~~°~ _p ' c.:ality by nr oviding esse.^.t'_al cO n.^a:nri ~e transportation - _ _. _ _ Ovec.ents, incl_ding: __ ~ ' Cc:a traction of c:;e ?oOt:9i.1 Freeway (Route 30) and _- the Bccte it Corona 3reew=_y; _, • Roca.nstrncti,... a.... .ide-:inc ,,, _-2'_5 throuch San _. • :ncreas e~ safety a::d t:a_fic cacacisy throuch _, _.,-.pry': cc ect, ___,.rfz c-c, and :Wa:oved maintenance _, _P iccai streets a.... _cad=_ .n each city and in ,_ uni^eerpc: ated areas; ,- ' Ccnstr~.:ctine, widenine, and i-,Orovement of state .. -__ aps and major focal scads and streets ie ' the oucho ct the cc unt y; L - 2 -_r i I i i shall the San Bernardino County Transnoztation _ Commission be authorized to establish by Ordinance No. A ~ 3 ~'~ a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax for a ~ pe zi od not to exceed £i£teea years, to be used solely ' ~~~~, for transportation improvements, establish an 6 li'~ ap oroori ations lir.it for tae Commission of $150,000,000 - and be authorized to issue limited tar bonds not to E "'~ exceed in acgre sate pzi rci ple at any one time in the 9 "~ amount outstanding of $500,000,000 to fund improvements IG I, I~I co rs iste rat with the Expenditure Plan? i I. '~I YES ~ :70 - i~'- ~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that: i ~ I, -- .F ~:~. 1, iae Re aistrar of Voters on July 28, 1987 published s'- N;i •- ~, notice of a deadline o: 5 o'clock p. m, on August 4, 1987 for ~`-~ .E su amittal c` ar euments for and acai.^si the measure, such >€_ .. arcvme.^.ts to be submitted in accordance with the Germs of the =_z `_= _ -?_ -~ rotic _. j s„ _ 'I -- 2. Tne oohs fcr the e:.ec`_i on her e'rv ozd:eyed wall be ~ i -- ~ _er.ed or. the day o_` tae electicn at ':00 a. m. and shall be kept - cpe^ ,.n _S1 8:00 _.m. _.. _.._ sane day, at which ..:ne such pol'_s ~ -- ', s :ail be cl ose c. - - ~. Cie conscl.dated ^zeci acts, polling pi aces, and ' -`- electicn c`_`_icers sez~.inc at sacra e_ecricr. ne'_1s _.^. such j - _-eci r.cts s:.all 5P t..a sa-~e, ~~r.e re applicabi e, as provided for i ., _.c-. i -- I 4. The Raci stzer o`. '.'et e:s o£ ~~e Canty of San ~- __rr.a; lino is hereby ordered acd directed to provide the election ' -~ ?recinets, pilling places and yeti nc bye t`.=_, toter..*.er with alt I ~" cth er electi c.^. supplies £cr tae conduct of such election, £or the ' e.ecti ons so co.^s of idated, which '_.. _nis case shai] be the same, ~,I G~~- 3 - ~ '~, and these shall be only one se`_ of election officers at such _ ~~~, a ecincts. ?'he Registrar of Voters is further ordered and 'directed (1) to set forth en all sac.ole bzllots relating to such ~ ~,i ccns olidate3 electi ors, to be nailad to the evaL tied electors of _ "'.the County of San Ber~arci.^.o, such a.e asuLe hereinabove set forth, 6 ~, ar,d to nail wit:^. snch sacp_e Sai:ots to such electors a printed - ~,~'I ecoy of a: eun eats, i`_ ary, for and aca'_ast such neasur e, and (2) E to provide absent voters bail ots fe: such cots olidzted elections y 'ii therewith, for the use of the cuali£i ed electors of the County of ID ij 5an Bernardino, who nay hate Seen entitled then eto in the manner 1, ~~'~provi ded Sh law. i ' 13 5. The Soard e£ Supervi sots, pursuant to Section 3753 lp ~, ~~, of the Elections Code, hereby designates Citizens for Measure A ~_ ~~~to file an ar gunent in favor of the peas ure. 16 ' ii i` i ~''>S. 1- PASSED AND ADOPTED by the 9oard of Supe: visors of »~ EZ'' ~g "San Bernardino County, State of California, by the following c >~- ;c ~~vot e: Ei:_ -n n.na: auger visors: a:xe<s, .-:crca^., naikez. ~uyne_ - ]i ti~ES. ~uoervisors: ..,,.._ _ P°SE\:: Superviscrs: F1cT{.:.% ~~ _ ) 55. - C~L^S"Y ..' SF': BEPSARJ I::O ) ~~ _ `~=S""-:n S!. SCL;DCER, Clerk Of t:iP. BbdrC~ Uf SL`peZV150L5 _• ., $c.^. ?E_^^.a: d:.^.O rDC.^,t V, Cal1f CL.^.l ar '1PYC Cy certify t110 'prat ~<rc rn he a fall, tree ar.d correct cnoy Of the reeprd of the ac" cn as the same acoears i^ t:-.a Pfficial M.in utes of said -~ 2.,a _,: a_ its r.,eeti^c c4 --AS.:== ~ 1987. Xr.F"'i'.r. ?".. SCUDDER, Clerk of the ~- Ecard of Super visors o£ 5an ?ernardi ro County ~eputy ~ ~-~ - CRDINA?7CE N0. A San Bernardino Ccunty Transpcrtaticn Cc:,.mission Transportation Expenditure Plan and Retail Transactions and ti~se Tax Ordinance The San Bernardino County Transpor*_ation Cos:,iss ion ordains as fcll coo: SECIIC?: i. SCI•^dERY. 'Ibis ordinance provides for the imposition cf a retail transactions and use tax of ene-half percent, the autSOri ~_ to issue limited tar. bond=_, the administration of the ..- proceeds, a county .,ra^.sportaticn e>:perditure plan, and the establishment of an appropriations limit. SECTI O?d II. DE°INITIO?:S. The fo'_icn: ing definitions shall apply in this crdinance: F.. E>:penditure Flan. "The E>;oenditure Plan" :-„eons the San Bernardino County Transportaticr. Expenditure Plan (adopted as part of this Ordinance) including ar. }' future amendments thereto. H. "County" means the Ccunty of San Bernardino. C. "COr.a.issicr." means the San Bernardino Ccunty Transportation Commissicn created pursuant to Section 130054 of the Public JtiiitLes Ccde. SBC_ICK III. AC'THCRIT'i. This ordica r.ce is enacted, in part, j...iSUG:. .. _ ,. ,:C piVVl 1V,iJ V1 .1J1V11 I'.'V i111.~CII~. 11, 1I 111 ScCtle.^. 90~~~) d~ld D1Vi51Cr c (CC ~: •E ^,C l.'~C L. 1Lh Section 24 ooCG) t_ .:e =ub:ic Ct:'_.~ies Cote, ~.... .,~_~ic;a '.52.2i and 7252.22 to ~.._ r,ev<-.'„E a^; =axz. _i cn Core. Ec,.___.. _.. 'PCS' Io?• ... ..'TnIL ~:R-.: A.CI'i C::S ietiD CSE TAX .;pop xey ercval~ of the sa^.=, Jthe Cerr.i ssicr. sha 11 impose, in the _....crrorated ~:;d uni-ccrpcrated ~errc- cf the Ccunty cf San °_e rnerdirc, ~ retal~.: transacticns and V..se ..a>: (referred to as .__ _: - _he ..te .._ ene-ha:.f of cne rce.^.t (D. Se) for _.,. [ __[___.. ''~>i yea _. ce _ ::a' c be _.~ edditicn tc -. __..__ t=::e=_ .. t!:orized Gb~' la-.:,4~inciud:ng any evi sting cr ..._.._ .._=-_ ,_. _.. _..._es . a>; cr ..ransect'cns ar.d cse tax. -.:.. ~.. ._... ~:.e _ =r_s ,. ,,.ch t;;e ;.a r, revenues - _ .. _.. _ .c ._ ,._ - -src nation p~.: ccses cr,ty ar.c -ay r.- .. ~ - __ __~_te~c ro, - -.•nis sat. .;n a: this y ,c ac ...... - ~_..~. :-e~a1 cticns -elated thereto and costs of ' ~ :. .,. ~r._ electic :, ~^e ...,:,s tsuc ~icn, carital ... _-, r _-..... ce, .nd cpe_~ticr. cf^.. ,.reefs, roads, and ,,, r, }`s, ...-i uciing tats .. =r',:a;'=. Thsse purpc ees ir.e' ude .:. ~,.. -_, f cr a.. r, i:'.q, =_r.'r.rc; rental rev i~.'.a, engineerir,a anc ~~9 resign costs, and related right-o:--.: a acquisition. They also nc'_cde e>:penditures including, but net li-.ited to, debt service en bends and er:penses in connection ~.r_th issuance cf bends. SECTI017 CI. SOI7DI;GG AIITHORITY. tipon JCteT approval cf the tax, the Ccrxis=_icn stall Lave the oa.:er tc sell or issue li-.ited tax bends in tP:e aggrecate principle at an}• cne time in t,`.e amount cutstar.ding of ;500 pillion to carry cut the transportation pre;;ects described in the Expenditure Pian. S ECTI C:: VIi. h:A L:TEN::!.CE CF EFFCnT. T::e Cctaiss ion, by the e..^,act^.ent cf t'•:is Grdinance, intsr. c,s t`;e additional funds provided cavern^:ent agencies by ~ his chapter to scnplenent e>:rst~r.g local revenues be_ng used for street and highway rneses. The gover.^.r.ent agencies s.*.al' n,a inta in their existing co-.r..i tment of local funds for transaortaticn purposes pursuant to this Ordinance, and the Cor.,mission shall enforce this Section by ac.propriate actions. SECTi CC; `i?iI. F.D^:ISI S: RATION OF Fi..?::E. The Cc~ni ssion shall - cse a.-.d co`~lect the tar., shall -.lcrate revenues derived trop tae tai:, a.^.d shall administer theme E;:penditure Plan attached to this Ordinance, consistent c:ith the previsions and priorities of the E>:perditure Plan, and consistent ~.:ith the Authority cited herein. SECT IDN i);. AD::it:ISTRATIVE COSTS. The Ccr.,nission shall expend only that a-.aunt of the funds generated frcn the tar. for staff support, audit, adr.Snistrative erpcnses, and contract services _t:ct Z'B BCBSSa"_ and Yea SC. dbie carry its respcnsibiiit~ies, and in no case sha'_1 they funds eroended for salaries and benefits exceed cne percent (1.) of the annual =-. n~~.. n .c ~crn~c ra. coA hn: the o~ ScCTT_C:r Y.. r!::.::r. r rECrRli:Ti C:.S ._.._ F1YSl:ant tc krticle ..__.5 c° _.._ _ _____.•_a Cc::st_'c.: _:_ - .. -ahlic litil hies Ccde S 13 i1 Co;c„ dr. aL'rrODTlat1CG5 _-._,. G°_ 5150 .,..lliOn 15 __tablishec fcr tt:e Co-,r„issio;: ,._ eac'r. fiscal year. Zhe -tcrcpr. ..te ns _.c.., shall b=_ sucect ,.,, adj ustnent as provided b~ la.. _ ___C:. ._. ~..~ - .~ F... °kP--._ _...ES. Sob; ect to voter _ ... _ ..,.~e s:: a'~' ._ e`_'`ect _..nediate'_ at the c_.=_e ... _.._ cel's~ .; 17over, ber 'SE? and sha'_1 become „~__ve _.. _rst dap c: s. calendar cuarter . .'.-...__ -___ _.-. _.~ ,_.. 5 a`_ter `-... .pt 1`C^, Cf tt:=_ Ordinance. ._ ca .= rc^: _.._. __ __ -- eiccti c:. fcr n':•ctereapproval cf the .: ,~ - :~l~r r_,.c s:: ion ~Y>:h ibit Yi, •. ::ic?: e:ecticn shall 'ce ;~,eld on -.. ...: cenac l!dated ., _. ., .:-.cr electicc_= c 'ce held ...; .,. _,~.. _ ....cc.• .ne electicm ..ai: be ca] led and conducted in c.. _ .-. .... c,_ as _ ide b'• la.a fcr `re conduct .,_ elections __._.- .i:c _ be_lct _.. ;;e -:'_cd tc t.*,= voters hall .. _ ,.Le ,. ,,. , scsiti~cn as set .art:: :. r. this ordinance, and the 7U voter infer ation handbooY. shall include the Expenditure Plan. Approval of the attached preposition, and imposition of the tax, shall rewire the vote of a majcrity of the electors voting on the attached proposition at the election described in this section. SECTi Ctd Xi II. SEVERABILZTY. if any tax or provision of this ordinznce is for any reason held im•zlid or unenforceable by a ccurt of competent jurisdiction, that holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining taxes or provisions, and the Ccmm fission declares that it would have passed each Hart of this crdinance irrespective cf the validity of zny other pzrt. PASSED A?+D ADOPTED by the San Rernard ir,o County Transportation Commission on July 29, 19A7 by the following vote: i,YES: Jor: N.i kels, Board of Supervisors Barbara Riordan, Board of Supervisors Larry rzlker, Board of Supervisors Barney Feuer, City cf Barstow A. ii. "Bill" Speyers, City of Big Bear Fred Aguiar, City of Chino Gary Boyles, City of Fontana Hug.*. Grant, City of Grand Terrace Elmer Digneo, City of Loma Linda Billy Oldfieid, City of I3ontclair Faye vyers Dast rup, City of Ontario Ti^. Johnson, City of Redlands Jchn Lcngvilie, City cf Rialto SCES: Done ..BSTE:iT IORS: Peecy Sa rtor, City .,. ,ictcrvil.e ~~ E7:PEI.D ITti RE ?L="7 FOR T'RAKSPORTATZOir' SALES :r... _.~ nE ADi:IISISTERED EY TfiE SAN EER::ARDINO C0ti17TY TFv_iSPCRTA:ION COh^•:I SSI0I7 (ADO PIED AS PART. OF ORDINANCE IC^. A BY SAID CO!•^:I SSION) Authority. Zn July 1597 the legis lature enacted the San B_r..*.ardine County Tzansporta t.i nn Sa',es Tar. Act 1Sect ions 190000 and 2=0000 et sec cf the Public tilities Code a..^.d Sections 7252.21 and 1252.22 cf the Revenue and Tavaticn Code) authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Ccmmission to adopt an Ordinance, containing an Expenditure Plan, placing before the electors an additional one-half pe rc<_nt salES tar. over a 15 year period to be used _°or transportation p~.:rpeses. The Act required that the Comr.~i s=_ien inc:ude certain specifcEd deterr.:i nations in t::^.e Ordinance and Plan. Distribution of Revenues. 'ihe revenues to be derived from the tax shall he distributed in the follco:ing prcaortions: 1. State hichuays and freeways 60$ 2. City and county streets and reads 20$ 3. A:ajcr arterial highc:ays 2C$ (if not ful'_y needed from t_ne tc to ne rcr arterial i~iy h,. a; ~, balr,.^.cE to be allocated for c'a}' a... count}~ streets ar.d road=_) Revenue estir„ales. Ile full estivate o: rev enues and ailocaticn t=_treen catecories is reflected ir: Schedule k of this Plan. Such rove rmc. e=_-irates are r.ot binding or controlling. State highway and freeFay projects. '. he s =_cif is projects to be .t__cted ~,..._~_ ' a cat<_gery ar=_ recited in Schedule B of this .... .'., ic'~'~~,c adctticr. of the crd_~. ...._ by the vcters, the rig; ra}' c be er,ended, if required, cy t_.=_ followinc processo ,.. :__ __ arendaen r. t~ cte c_...,:.,. =_sicn; reciting ... A.r r': c': al b}' t:^,e toard c` sere r~.~i scrs. ,,. ~~: al -aj ority cf the cities con _=tituting a r-~cri-, of the .nc orporz.te:i ~-c pu:aticn. .,~ ,-._,,.-,:tes fcr su~:. projects are net bi r:c inq or controlling. ~~ Local distribution formula. The annual distribution of °rpenditure Category No. 2, city and county streets and roads, shall be on a per capita basis using the most recent State Department of Finance population estir.,ates, wi t.h the County's portico based upon unincorporated population. High Desert share. Expenditures for transportation projects, aggregating all three distribution categories over each five year cericd, in the high desert region of the county, the boundaries of >:hich are defined as that area included in the aroposed Mojave County, shall be not less than the estimated revenues generated from that region, less a proport icnate share cf the Coruaission's administrative costs (li,-„ited to 1`< ,-„a..~- a.). 4rterial Projects. The arterial portion shall be expended pursuant to a five-year project list to be adopted by the co^.:~issicn, extended annually for one year, available for public re': ieo:, to be first adopted at least 30 days prior to the election. city and County Projects. The city and county portions shall be expended pursuan*_ to a five-year project list to be adopted by a resolution by each city council and the Beard of Supervisors, resp ective],y, evt ended annually for one year, available for public review, to be first adopted at least 30 days prior to the election. identifying Signs. All r„aj or projects, state ar,d local, shall be tested ..- constriction with apFrnnr fate signs identifying the-, as recipients of funds from this Act. (073 SCHEDULE A SALES TAX RE i~E!;tiE FROG?A1~: In N,illions of Dollars 7ota1 Sales Tax Revenues 500 (40 A:illion in 1588, ______ increasing 5% annually for true Growth, 15 years) Sute Hig:^.way Program (60%) SiIP estivate of federal 540 540 and state funds anticipated to be available for sales tar. project=_, years 6 through 15 (years 1-5 already prcgrar„ved 260 fcr ether projects)' TOTAL FOR STATE HIGHWAY PROJECTS 800 Local Program (40%) 360 City/County local streets 120 (2ok of total) Pfajor Arterials 120 (20% of total) TOTAL SALES TAX REVENUES 900 !:ote: Inflationary increase net cresented; project costs are presented ir; current aalue=_ ~,. .. ~.. a_su-.ption that revenue inflaticc and cost .- ic^ 're equal. State highway cre,.ects include 1G ~, ceneineerine and ..e construction insp=.cticn. ..i F7 4, ~ ~ SCHEDOLE H LIST OF STF.TE HIGHFAY PROJECTS TO EE FUNDED UNDER 1/2 CENT SALES TAX ROUTE DESCRIPTION COST IN THOUSANDS I-iG Oranae Street in Redlands to Yucaipa Blvd. 15,000 k:iden by One Lane na c'r. Directicn I-215 :-10 to Route 30 98,000 Eiden to Eight. Lanes, Rebuild Interchanges at Baseline and Firth Streets SP.-lE Eig Bear Lake Valley 12,000 Eiden to Four Lanes Include Possible Couplet SR-18 Pa lii~dale Rd., I-15 to Route 395 7,000 T;idea to Four Lanes, Signal Improvements SR-3G i-2i0 in San Dimas to I-215 957,000 Euild Six-Lane Freeway SP.-71 Riverside County Line to 79,000 _ - nngeles county .,ine Euild Six-Lane Freeway -... _+.~n~rr r--rnlr8 Access Improvements 7,000 'Federal ::a tch) _..__. ._..a ,- ..a ..,...,.nc .,...,._ ;,; ~:i11i ^; Yezr) 75,000 Coat:agency (Cos*_ Char.c as, Corridor 50,000 Pr=_se rvat:cn, HC~ Lace Additions, and ., .'.Er Pr ;ECtsJ _.. .,.u cvJ, GG: ]'G: _. .. .t - ..ASE c'Se ..^.CL ^resented: project costs are ... .: :: GCI~ _ .th as s':r..pt iCli that rE\'E.^.UE _. __ ._ _.. _ . __ .'_:- ..~ ~.-F ~cl. osts hzee eon _ _. .. ..__ ~rcjects i~.c 1.CE 1Gz e.^.c ineering and 5% ~ ~s SCHEDULE 8 (1) `rotes on Fanded =rc~ects (all projects inc l•,:de loF engineering and 5~ construction inspection) I-le Fidening from iizterran to Orange Street and reconstruction of iucaiaa ir.tercharee are already ir. 19&6 STIP. This continues the ~.;idening east to Yucaipa. cost source: caltrans 19&7. I-215 tiogrades to mode r.^. standzrds. Diar..ond interchanges with ;: est side access at Easeline and Fifth Streets. Right of way estir,~ated at $10 million, construction at $75 million. Cost source: caltrans 1587 prelim.i nary. 5R 12~ Bin Bear, 'continues firer., 19c6 STIP project widening f rem Pine Knot tc Stanfield. Cost source: caltrans 1987. SR to Victorville, continues from 1956 STIP project widening to Cahuenea; corrects vertical alignment. Cost source: Caltran5 1987. SR 3C 1986 STIP orograms Route 30 from I-10 in Redlands o:est past I-215 to Highland Avenue in San Berrardino. Sha project coc,pletes Rcute 30 west tc I-210. Si>: '_ane estimate used; portion between .-15 to I-215 r.ay be loner scope. Cost SoUTCe: ., n.. _...v .~~ ..Y ~ ...u.: , . ~.... ...,C L..L ~G.. ~.. ~~.... $R it ~Cta1 ^y rOjECt EiaEnGS fror. :-".0 to SR 91; dud San Bernardinc Ccu r..y percicn prograamed. SR 60/71 ir.terc'r.ange as s~c.-,ed fa'_i st2te cert. SR 60 to I-10 ncrticn a=_sur..ed '_es angeies; Riverside County portic^ to SR Sl assu-.ed Ccrps cf F,ngineers as eleme r.t cf Pradc cam, upcrade project. Cost source: CCU a] tCV'u !~ S:L:::;'• 'ICS(. C`: ~: _cca~. r.et acainst S.5 ,~.i'_lic r. federal ~eeonstraticn project. _.._. :-: ':ana~s scv is <_. s, averace 5C`: of kcal share for _ revere..^.ts ,.ec.rd. See list, schedule B (2). c-~,c;rqur;c •; dreviucs f.or p^esitle cost changes in projects, a,.,._d projec`s, HG'J lanes on e>:.isting freeways, and ::ht of ::av crotecti on ... ne•.: transport atior, ___r2dcrs 4e i::c dcvcicped by SP.:iBF.G anP caltrans. Y~~ sCHEDOLE 8 (2) Potential interchanges, overcrossings, major state highway intersections (Shared funding frog interchange fund in state highway portion, set at $5 pillion per year. Basic policy is to provide 50~ of local share cost: pore in special cases c.~h ere area is already fully developed. Projects shown are representztive only and include those under various stages o£ consideration; others can be added over tine. SANBAG mill establish procedures for selection.) 'e s` ~iallev Rt. 60j Haven interchange ccnstruction I-15/SUrupa interchange enlarc e:cent I-15/Foothill interchange enlarcepent P(id-Vallev I-10/Alder interchange construction and/or (Cedar-Sierra) ipprover~e nts tc e;:isting I-i5/Dec cre interchange ipprover.~ent East - '_e~.' i-10/~Cabzsh interchange ir_prc: ec.ent I-1C G'.. ":ernon intercharwe irprc•: e-.e nt .-=..'i~,a __.. a:. _..terc:;ange __......__. _..-ion -., .'G ra -.- Terrace .^: e',; a. cr _-_ .,. __ _..terchanges ,'z. `.c^~-. _., local. TC_a~ -._. '.:e r'-.:- -. r. .r.le rcta r.qs cr:arc=rent interchange cc~,=_«-..: _.. -: on `P 7 Route 18/Lake intersection ir.p rover.:ent Greccry Rcad Rode 16/Big Bear das, bricge reccnstrncticns intersection Deser~ I-15j Ranchero intercY.anc=_ constr~.:ction I-15j=ear t'a lley interchance enlarcensnt _-15/gook Roar overcrossing anc/or interchange constriction I-15/N:ojave interchange enlaraenent Route :95/2helan irtersecti cn relocation p=I-15/Sisauaie overores si.^.c an3/er interchange ccnstruc.ion 6 ~~' ~ ~ r, ~ ,~, r',(~i The San Semarcino County TransporleGOn Commission "'^~-.. j SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCfATED GOVERNMENTS -~ APLnfGNING CGJ!.GL vF CGGFERhTING INTERACTIVE GOVERNMENTS ~tv E~ e //e~~ "~_ ,t/{~~O <=4 Ncrp grrov:heztl Fver.ue. Style 101 'Y' Sz, Ee'nzicino. Cal~,fcrn:a 9240+ ;7141 86<~B276 Date: August 3, 1557 .c: Citp Mayors, City 3:a Wagers/Adr..inistrators, and City clerks From: i4esley C. *:cDani el, Executit^e Director Subject: Election support Resolution Th=_ Ccunty Board of Ss:erviscrs cr. Aucu=_t ~ i9"a7 apprcved the attar^ed Resoluticn placi rg cur transpcrtaticn sales tax measure cr. the :;ovember ballot. The SAIaBA.G Eoard last week approved the attached Ordinance and Bxpenditure Plan, which is the formal auesticn tc ge before the vot=_rs. A.lso approved at the SANBAG hooting o:as the first five yezr ar«erial program, which is also attached; we xill undoubtedly' be -.aking cone additicns in the next couple cf ^rcnths. .."-.t the same ti-re, the SAtiBAG Board felt that it was now ar..r-cn-,are t^ ,,.r GC eve.-y r;remter 'r~ri sdic ~i cn tc adept rescluticns of support for the actual election (an earlier recuast had been supoort for the enabling legislation cnly)- A draft resoiutior. is enclcsed rr,r •,:~:•. !,« .: .. ....... .. ... v___. '•:or?: kith c t•. staff in supplying ~nfcrraticn fcr any~revis ions F, ea=_e place this resclut ion tcfcre pc~r Ccuncils for support as _;_ e as pessc.,_e iCe ..„rid _..~ .,, cc-,piete action thrcu_~w~« °~•- ..; Septec.Ler io. riease send ccnpieted Rescluticns to ..s __. _.-..~aigr. use. ::e :__ ___ k.c - e?'i-- .. _ _. ,. c. -._ -- 'cter crcanizations __ -c__..ls, .. _- .c ..=e `the sots 2.esc ..rich in anended four. :- _.:r Chaa'cer~ c` C;a,-,erce cr ether a=_sociations can be -" '9c:, -=~ -~ eu - eas=_. __„-, ide then with the -' r^ •-. = •. a,E ~ !:0 C .'0\ vOrp, _r -[c ._.Inpc 1'N:'Ll4e cfC .ES ..-a.. t`.e. aa.;.<y:![ntC F.E:.c.an...r.. .: .. ... ~Lr ..O°~e.9ECJ4Ji~0 i League of California Cities ;. 1400 KSTREET • SACRAMENTD,GA 95a14 • (916)4445790 camana Cnms Wwh Togxnel SdCLdmelt0, CA July 8, 1987 70: THE FR70PABCF: M4YOR AtID CITY COfNCIL RE: DFSIG1~41TICN ~' YVfING DIIEGAIB FOR LE'7fGDE ANNUAL CClffERF1X.E Dear City Official: This year's League Annual Cofference ie scheduled for October 4-7 in San FYanciseo. The most important aspect of the Annual Conference is the General Business Swaim at which time the membership takes scrim m oonference reeolutione. It is important for California cities to take the initiative in developing positive programs for the Euture. Annual Cofference resolutions will guide cities and the League in our efforts to iv~zove the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government within this state. All cities should be represented at the Business Sessim m 1Lesday afternoon, October 6, at 2:00 p.m. in San FYancisoo's Fbeome Center. Rb expedite the caduct of business at this to ane vote rn matters affecting mmicipal or League policy. A wring card will be given to the city official designated by the City Council m the enclosed "wring delegate form." If the Mayor or a member Of the City Comcil is in attendance at the Cofference, it is expected that one of these officials will be designated as the wring delegate. Efiwever, if the City Council will cot have a registered delegate at the Conference but will be represented by other city officials, me of these officials should be designated the wring delegate or alternate. Please forward the inclosed "voting delegate form" to the Sacramento office of the i,eague at the earliest possible time, so that the proper records may be established for the Conference. The wring delegate may pick up the city's wring wrd in the League Registratim Area at the Mceeme Center in San FYancisw. If neither the wring delegate roc alternate is able to attend the Business Sessim, the wring delegate or alternate may pass the wring card to another of Eicial from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Oasni[tee to mike the exchange. An outline of the wring procedures that will be followed at this conference is printed on the reverse side of this memo. It is suggested that the Mayor and all Council Members from a given city try to sik together at the Business Sessim so that, if amerdmenis are considered, there may be an opportunity to exchange points of view and arrive at a consensus before the city's wte is cast. Your moperatim in returning the attached "wring delegate form" as soon as possible will be appreciated. Dm Banirghoven Ekecutive Director (,l/ longue of California Cities Nrual Nnterence Voting Ptncedures 1. Fbch member city with city officials registered at the Amual Canferenoe has a right to cast one vote m matters paztaining to Iaague policy. 2. M1b wet the city's vote a city official wet have in his or her p>aeceeicn the city's voting wrd and be registered with the Credentials Committee. 3. Prior to the Amwl Crnference, each city should designate a voting delegate acd an alternate and return the outing Delegate Firm to the longue for use by the Credentials Cc~ittee. 4. 'fine voting delegate or alternate wY picK up the city's voting oard at the voting delegate's desk in the conference registration arse. 5. tree exdwge of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternate ie permitted. 6. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Session, the voting delegate a alternaate may peu tha voting card to another official from the ease city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Cozittee to dce the emdhanga. 7. Oualifiwtian of an initia[ive resolution is judged in pert by the validity of signatures. Chly the eigwturea of city officials who, axarding to the records of the Credentials Coemittee, aze authorized to use the city's voting card end atw have left a sample of their eignntures m the Credentials Committee's register will be approved. O 1n ..f .i: .fn ~A~ rte...'...." :t:yl : M1~ .i. .^f,.__ ..~.... w .. u~.wuw.c ule aayi:L ui a ui iy oEEicialyto veto at the Business Seeeion.•• disalrft.policy ~$i :~ ,~ d~...? CITY OF UPLAND q ~S ,i 460 N. Euelid Avenue P.O. Boz 460 P7 Upland, Califonua 91765 17141 962-1352 (714)981-3323 August 11, 1987 RICHgRO G gNDER$ON M gYOR Mr. Leuien Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 920 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifornie 91730 RE: Specific Plan for Foothill Blvd./Realignment of Red Mill D - Ranh C Carron Deat Mz. Wasserman: We understand that this above-mentioneC item will be diacusaed at Rancho's August 19, 1987 Council Meeting. AC that meeting, we would appreciate it if you would read ihn at- tached Excerpt of Minutes which expresses Upland's op sition to the proposed realignment of Red Hill Country Club io Grave Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, that was recently a ro ed by y#j2 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission. Thank you for your consideration. ~ ~,~ ~' , Richard G. And CITY OF UPLAND i fi Attachment: Excerpt of Minutes, Certified pc: Engineering Dept. Planning Dept. City Manager ..~~. (` ~ Y C[[lIDICXyitl~ Slate of California ) County ¢f San Bernardino ) ea. ' city of Upland ) I. Oozem [. Cazpmter, City Clerk in and for the City of Dplaed, Co®!p of 9a0 [ernardiao, hereby certify the attached Bxc¢zpt of Minutes is a true and - correct portion of the Minutes now on file in this office. I111RffiSS II~WP, I have hereunto set wy hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Upland thin Eta day of xuquat, 1987. ' ~wn~ ~ ~ e~~c~~ s~.~ Doreen ft. Carpenter, City ark ~ . PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FOR RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION ON MILLIKEN AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA T~-!E .^,T~n'tSU1V, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY P.U.C. N0. 2-95.6 AUGUST 1987 ~. ~ DELEUN.GATHER 0 CGMPANY 016DkFAS MD PIAMEAB ~ SIW FlIMICRO. CKffONRA L.0. KING ENGINEERING CO.. INC. CDNSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS ONTARID.CALIFGRNIA DeLEUW GATHER o/ Uuw, Cafnar y ComvseY ow Rat E/pmema en0 PlanNn 120 Noward Street P O. Bas 3821 San Francisco, Calilornia 94119 1415) 496-8060 August 13, 1987 Aoooreble Mayor and Masbate of the Council City of Amcho Cuceeopga 9161 Bmelise Road Rmcho Cucmonge, California 91730 Subject: Preliainary ~gieeering Studies for Propsed Railroad Orede Separation oa Milliken Avenue et !be ATASP Rai lwny "Pmedme" Line, P.U.C. 2-96.6 CouncilPeravna: Ia eccordmce with the AgreAent between the City of Amcho Cucaeonge and our firms, dated Jmuary 7, 1987, we subeit herewi tb our report covering preliainery mHiaeviag studies sad coat eetislntes for a propwed railroad /rode sepen+tioa m Milliken Avenue et The Atchison, Topeka 6 Smte Pe Railway Secrond District track. We wish to express our appreciation for the cooperation afforded W by Russell A. Maguire of the Cos unity Developemt Depertsent, and sAben of his staff, Ne also wisk to tbevk A. L. Polish, Regional Bngineer, 9mte Pe Railway Cost Lines, for the date provided thr»ugh the office of the kssistmt Omerel Mmeger, eoginmrisg, A. A. Reaps, is Loe Angeles, Tbia report was prepared under ibe supvviaim of the writer. The se,jor portions of ibe engineering deign sad eoet eetisetee were prepared by Christopher Clerk, P.H., Project Mmeger, sad Roberto Zeleye, P.H., of our firs. The Hpviroosentel Aessesent wen prepared by L. D. Hipg, Inc., of Ontario, with whca we ere msocieted on this project. We look forward to maisting the City in ispleaentetiop of thin Iong needed separation - to estebl ish a sir, depandeble north-eoutb arterial which will not be subject to dincvptien by railroad traffic. Sincerely your, Robert M. Berton ~~~`_.., chief Bagipenr .r., ~ '`Ar~ , rABLe of coRr®rls Pe¢e BXB%CUTIVR SIlMARY 68-I INTRODUCTION 1 NRRD FOR NRW CA03SING OF TDB MILWAY 1 RXISTINO RAILROAD FACILITIES AND TRAFFIC Possible Reis Coswuter Traffic Forxr Raiser Steel Plant, Fontme Sussxuy of Train Moveeenta and Delays Rail Facilities et the Site Average Deily Vehicular Volu~ea Vehicular Speeds 6sergency Services - Fire Depertaent SITE COlD)ITIONS Topography Fomdat ion and Seiasic Conditions Existing and Plemed Lmd Uaea Existing end Plumed Utilities Metropolitm Water Diatrici Aqueduct Utility Relocation Batisates DRSION STANDARDS AND CRIrRRIA 8 Railroad Bridge (Underpass Alteroetive) 8 Underpass Requirenenta 8 Off-Track Meiotmmce Roadway 'rehicuier tlndge (Overhead) 9 Street and Righway Oeosietric Stmderds 9 Vertical Railroad Cleermces For Overhead Structures 30 Rorizontel Clearmces For Railroad Traffic 30 Teaporery Coostruction Cleermcea (Aorizongel) 11 Terporery Construction Cleermces (Vertical) and Type of Overhead Structure I1 Miscellmeoue Provisions For Overheads 11 Recapended Typical Roadway Section for Underpesa .ll UNDRRPASS AND OVRRPASS 3TUDY PLANS 13 Underpass (Plate 2) 13 Overpesa Alterestivee (Pletea 3 through 6) 14 Lmdacapiag and Appeermce 15 Flood Control Projects -- Relationship of Overpass and Underpass Alveroat ivea to Availability of Bsbmkeent Borrow Materiels or Oispaael of Rxcevated Materiels 15 Coryerison of Overpm Plm vs. Underpass 16 Ri ghta-af-Nay 19 Reisiog or Lowering of Railroad 19 8g8CD'[IY8 ff~BY This report prorenta preliminary geometric layouts end coat ortimetor for e reilroed grade separation on the proposed northerly extension of Milliken Avenue, to be carried on bridge strecturor order or over the Smte Fe Secood District "Pasadena" mainline, in the City of Rmcho Cucamonga. 3mta Fe'a rail movements et the site now renge between 22 to 28 per day. Adjacent distribution, indmtrial end werehoming-type lend develoPmenks, ell served by truck and rail, clearly suggest that rail switching activity et the site will expected to increme significmtiy over the next two decades. Traffic at the reilroed crossing would approximate 19,500 vehi clor per day by the date of opening of en mderpora or overpms in 1989. By the year 2010 traffic is expected to increme to 38,000-45,000 vehiclm per day. A specific horizontal alignment for the Milliken Avenue extevaion hen been ortahliahed in previous atudim. All needed right-vf-wey is vacant and hen been dedicated, or is subject to dedication. Topographic end Bite conditima ere appropriate far either m mderpmm or m overpma. The grade aeparatim will be located entirely within m indmtrial/wholornle distribution area. The future Minter Plm width of Milliken Avenue cells for s six-lore divided thoroughfare. M initial four-lore et'vcture over the reilroed could accommodate traffic for et lent two decades before widening would be required, m the traffic capacity of the street is limited by khe adjacent sigoelized intersection. The plenned etrrei el: a...."F ......ia _____ ..... ... .. track minline, and the emterly leg of+e~"Y"utreck~c Ineedditiws1Senta Fe requires that apace be provided for s future aecmd tredt parallel and adjacent to the existing mainline. Therefore, m overpms alternative mat spina total of three tredca. An mderpees would coaaiat of two separate structures - one For the mainline and future parallel track; the second, a curved bridge to carry the emterly leg of the "Y" track. Teoporerv Tracks Revuired For Underoma Construction Comtruct ion of en mderpma would require the complex construction of temporary "shoofly" tracks to carry through train traffic aromd the excaveti oo site, m well m relocation of two critical spur tracks extending both to the north and the south. After the mderpma structuror are completed, the tracks and signals mint then be rorkored to present locations. This temporary trackwork, together with msociated railroad si gnat work, contributor to the somewhat higher cost of coostrection and incremes the tine required to complete construction by about six movtha; m compered with the overpma, which door not require temporary trackwork. BS-1 Aa noted fro. the above tabulation, the several overpma eltemet ivea ell offer aubstmtiel cost savings m compered pith the wderpma. Fundin¢ and Pmeible State Mniatmce The proposed grade seperet ion would technically qualify for m allocation wder the mnuel t15 million Califomie Orsde Seperetiw Progrs, and now occupies priority position No. 25 on the etetewide list mtabliahed by the Cel ifomie Public Utilities Coa•iaaion. However, became of intense competi lion for fwda fro other grade separation projects throughout the State end the lisited state fwda, only the wet tint-effective eltemetive -- the 4-line overpass on 6-lme embmkmmt - offers my remoneble thence of receiving a catching allocation, if the project rinks sufficiently high. There is a remoneble poasib it ity that a retroactive allocation oP Bone t1.5 Billion sight be obtained from the Cel ifornia Grade Separation fwds in aoca subsequent year, but this is by no means guarm teed. Finmciel plmning for my of the other geometric wderpma or Pverpms alternatives moat be predicated on local fwding without catching insistence from either the railroad or the State Orede Separetim Progres. Therefore, wder the moat favorable conditions, costa of the wderpma and overpma alternatives would be m follows: Type of Separation Underpins P1 ~1.. o Overpma, 4 line bridge with 6 lane esbminmt epproeCllea, 45 mph design speed, Plate 6 Groea Cmt 54.1 mill ioo 3.01 Billion Less Potential Retroactive State Al locetimR Hone f1.5 million Net Cmt to be Defrayed from Local Sourcm f4.1 million 51.5 million to 53.0 million 3NOTg: Outlook for future retroactive ellwe[ion judged at about 60% cartein. Aesihetica cad Lmdscapin¢ Preliminary designs end coat mticata for the several wderpma and overpms eiternativea nll mauls a high level of ettmctive Imdaceping, irrigation, and medico treetmmk consistent pith other asp boulevards in Rmche Cucasonge. After the surrowding indmtrial, werehome, and din tribution area is fully developed, neither the wderpma nor !be overpass would constitute a prwinmt lmdcark. The wderpm^ world be depreeaed below existing ground, while the crest of the overpma mould rise to m elevation epproxicately level pith the rooftops of surrounding werehousea. BS-3 f~ c cX G L TABLE OR CONTgNTS Pe¢e 8%E%CUTIVB SUMMRY ~ 1 INTRODUCTION NBED FOR N8W CROSSING OF TBH RAILWAY i A%ISTING RAILROAD FACILITIES AND TRAFFIC Ponnible Rsil Cosmuter Traffic Foner Reiser Steel Plmt, Fontme Suanery of Train Moveeenta and Delays Rail Facilities at the Site Average Deily Vehicular Volusea Vehicular Speeds lisergency Services - Fire Depertsent SITE CONDITIONS Topography Foundation and Seieeic Conditions 8xiating and Planned Lmd Uaes Rxiating and Plemed Utilities Metropolitm Water District Aqueduct Utility Relocation Hsti~etea DRS ICN STANDARDS AND CRITRRIA R Railroad Bridge (Underpass Alternative) 8 Underpass Requiresmta B Off-Track Meinlmmce Roedwey g Vn6:...n_.... o-:a.- .n..__. °•.. ,,.......moo,:; g Street and Biglnny Geosetric Stmderda g Vertical Railroad Cleermces For Overhead Structures 10 Rorizontel Cleermcea For Railroad Traffic 10 Teaporery Construction ClearmCtd (Aori zongal) I1 Tesporery Com traction Cleerencea (Vertical) and Type of Overhead Structure 11 Miecellmeoue Provisions For Overheads I1 Recossended Typical Rosdway Section for Underpass 11 UMIBRPASS AND OIBRPAS3 STUDY PLANS 13 Underpass (Plate 2) 13 Overpass Alternstivee (Plates 3 through 6) 14 Lendecepisg and Appeermce 15 Float Control Protects -- Relationship o Overpass and Underpass Alveroetivee to Aveilebil ity of 8~hmloaent Borrow Materiels or Disposal of 8xcevetad McLeriela 15 Coeperison of Overpass Plm ve. Underpme 16 Rights-of-Nay 18 Re is isg or Lowering of Railroad lg TABLB OP COIITSIf1S Pe¢e CDST BSTIMATBS 20 Stsge Cointructioa 26 Underpins 26 Overpins Alternatives 26 Funding for Subsequent Stegm 27 MBTHODS OF FINANCING 2B f15 Milliw Aaninl Celiforoie State Grade Seperetiw Funds 2g Overpms vs. Underpein et Milliken Avenue 29 Railroad Contributioe P9 Local 8ighwey Funds 31 Federal-Aid Urbm Fmde 31 Asamasmt District Financing 31 Funding Frw Local Swrcin 31 BNVIROMf6NTAL ASSBSSMBNT 32 INTRODUCTION 32 ALTBRNATIVB TO TBB PRUPOSBD PROJBCT 32 PNDPOSBD PROJECT ~ Detereinetion 33 BNYIAONMBNTAL SIGNIPICANCB C88CRLIST 34 LIST OF PLAT83 Plate 1 - City n4 Rwnrhn C..ran,nn~e v:..;._. : ~.. u... Plate 2 - Milliken Ave. Underpass, Alt. _ 1 (8 Lases-55 aph) Plate 3 - Milliken Ave. Underpins, Alt. 2A (8 Lenin-55 nph) Plate 4 - Milliken Ave. Underpins, Alt. ZB (6 Lines-40 aph) Plate 5 - Milliken Ave. Underpins, Alt. 3A (4 Lases-55 qrh) Plate 6 - Milliken Ave. Underpins, Alt. 3B (4 Lanes-40 eph) LIST OF TABLBS Table 1 - Preliiinery Cwt 8ati~ete, Underpins Table 2 - Preli~insry Cwt 8atisste, Overpein (6 Leon-55 siph) Table 3 - Preli~inery Cwt 8ati~ete, Overpins (6 Lines-40 ^ph) Te61e 4 - Preli~iaery Cwt Bstisete, Overpass (4 Lines-56 .ph) Table 5 - preli>riaery Cwt Bstisete, Overpein (4 Imes-40 aqh) Table 6 - Milliken Avmue Grade Seperetioin in Relsted to Potential State Railrvsd Grade Seperetiw Assistance 6ABCOTI96 3UMMARY This report prenmts proliminary geometric layouts and amt ntimatn for e railroad grade seperotion on the proposed northerly ntene ion of Milliken Avenm, to 6e carried m hridge structure under or over the Smte Fe Secovd District "Pmadme" meinlive, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Smte Fe'a rail movoenta et the site now rmge between 22 to 2R per day. Adjacent distribution, industrial end werehoming-type lend developments, ell served by truck and rail, clearly suggnt that rail switching activity et the site will acpected to increase significmtly ovec the next two decades. Traffic et the railroad crossing would approximate 19,500 vehi cln per day by the date of opening of m mderpma or overpms in 1989. By the year 2010 traffic is expected to increase to 38,000-45,000 vehicles per day. A specific horizontal alig'uent for the Milliken Avenue extension 6m been ntabliahed in previous studies. All needed right-afy+ay is vacant and hen been dedicated, or is subject to dcdicet ioa. lopogrephic end site conditions ere appropriate for either m mderpma or m overpams. The grade aeperet ion will be located entirely wikhin en indmtriel/wholesale distribution area. The future Metier Plm width of Milliken Avenue calla for a six-lens divided thoroughfare. An initial fmr-lens structure over the reilroed could accommodate traffic for et lent two decades before widening would be required, m the traffic capacity o4 the street is limited by the adjacent signal izad ietersectiomm. The pl coned street alignment would cross the Smte Fe'a exist in¢ sin¢le ' ~:. mmiuiive, and the emteriy leg of a "Y" track. In additim, Smta Fe requires that apace De provided for a future secend track parallel and edjeceni to the existing mainline. Therefore, m overpme elternetive moat epm a total of three tracks. M mderpmm would consist of two separate structure - one for the mainline and future parallel track; the second, a curved bridge to carry the emterly leg of the "Y" track. Temporary Tracks Rea 'red F r Underomn Covatructim Construction of m mderpms would require the complex construction of temporary "shoofly" tracks to carry througA train traffic aromd the excevetioa Bite, m well ea relocaLioo of two critical spur Crecka extending both to the north and the south. After the mderpma atruciurn ere completed, the tracks and signals mmt then be restored to prnmt locations. This temporary treckwark, together with maociated reilroed gignel xerk, contributes to the somewhat higher coat of construction and increases the time required to complete construction by about six sovtha; m compered with the overpms, which don not require temporary treckvrork. BS-1 Alternative Uaderpms sod Overoma Plena Preliainary plm, profile, and typical aectioo layouts, together with coat mtiietq, were prepared for a variety of uaderpem and overpma elternativa, m tabulated below: See Plate Dmign Approxiaate ~~~-~~-~~ ~ _ -~- (Millions) 2 Dnderpma 55 MPH yl.l 3 Overhead - 6 Lanes, 55 MPD 53.555 55 aph Design Speed 4 Overhead - 6 Lmm 40 MPH f3.19f 4 Overhead - 6 Lmm 45 MPH t3.22* Modified (NOT SIIOMN) 5 Overhead - 4 Lanes 55 MPH f3.395 oa 6-Lme ~baniumt; cm be widened to 6 Leaea 6 Overhmd - 4 Lmm 44 !+°!! :~. o:r: an 6-Lme Habesluent; caa be widened to 6 Linea 6 Overhead - 4 Lmm 45 MPH 53.01 Modified on 6-Lme Babmloent; cm be widened to 6 Lenin (Hecaa~mded) SCoeta sham net after mau~ed credit for excavation frc~ flood con trol delmtion bmiaa. BS-2 Aa noted fro. the above tabulation, the aeverel overpma alternatives ell offer aubatmtiel coat savings m tampered with the enderpma. Funding and Poaeible State Aaai trace The proposed grade sePnratiw would technically qualify for m allocation under the mnual S15 aillion California Orede Separation PrograB, and nor occupim priority position No. 25 on the atetewide lint mtabliahed by the California Public Ulilitim Co~ianian. Romeveq became oP intense coBpetition for fords from other grade aeperation proj ectn throughout the State and the limited state fwda, only the Boat tort-effec[ive alternative -- the 4-lore overpms on 6-lme embmluent -offers my reinonable chmce of receiving a Botching el local ion, if the project rinks sufficient ly high. There is a remena6le poasibil ity that a retroactive allocation of acme 51.5 Billion sight 6e obtained frw the California Grade Separation funds in awe subsequent year, but this is by no means guarmteed. Finmcial plmning for my of the other geometric underpma or overpms alternatives moat. be predicated on local fording without Retching msiatmce frw either the railroad or the State Orede Separation Program. Therefore, order the coat favorable conditions, coats of the underpins and overpesa elternetivea would he m follows: Leas Potmtiel Net Cwt to be TYPe of Retrwctive State Defrayed frw Separation Gross Cost Allocations Local Swrcm Underpma f4.1 Billioo None f4.1 million Plate 2 Overpma, 4 lore 3.01 million 51.5 aillion f1.5 aillion bridge with to 6 lore eabmluent f3.0 Billion epproachm, 45 Bph design speed, P7 ate 6 SNOTS: Outlook for future retroactive allocation judged et about 60l certain. Aeathetica and Lmdaca i Prel iainary desi goo and cost mtiBntm far the several mderpms and overpms elternstivea all mouse a high 1¢vei of attractive lmdscnping, irri getion, and aedim ireetaent cons istmt with other new boulevards in Rmcho Cuceaonge. After the surrounding induet riel, warehoine, and distribution area is fully developed, neither the wderpme nor the nverpaaa would constitute a prominent lemd•erk. The enderpme would be depressed below existing ground, while the crest of the overpa a would rise to m elevet ion epproxiaetely level with the rwftops of aurromding warehouses. SS-3 Relation to Flood Cwtrol Protects The City of Rancho Cucawnge plans several sejoc start, drainage esd flood detention bmim xbich will require large vol,aee of exceveliw, but which ere not maw funded. If m ovarpma is selected, the epprosch enbaoluenta can utilize aeteriels to be excavated frame the detmtiw basias, with potential economic benefits to the Ylood control end grade seperetiw projects. Thus the overpass offers en opportunity to complete one or amore critically needed flood control projects, end to protect wlnereble residential neighborhoods et dates earlier then would otherwise be possible, and with aubateotial seviags of cwt. Thde flood cwtrol benefits ere not available frw the u~derpms alternative, which generates excavation which would have to be wetted or otherwise dispwed of. finvi roneentel Asaesstw! A prel ir.inery Bnvirarental Asenasent determined that the proposed grade seperotion, either m underpma or m overp6es, will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Recosendetions On the basis of the substmtiel di4fereace in cost, Ehe potential flood rnntrol benefits, the shorter file for covetrvctiw, end the possible opportunity of obteiaiag a retroactive allocation of about f1.5 million frw the State Grade Seperstiw fund, we recc~end the overpass alternet ive. The overpms elteraetivea were developed on the bmi• of 40 ryh and 55 aph design speeds, which primarily relate to sim d;wt.,,r.... ...~ gal veriicai curve. Me would reca~md that 4ine1 design be based..^ 0o a~aight distance of not less then 45 trph. SS-4 PBSIIIIINANY NNOINBBHIlq >DiPORT P80p'OS® MILLIHBN AVBNIB OYADB SHPARATION AT TB8 SANTA FB BAILNAY, BANCBO CUCAMOtAiA, CALIFbID1IA P.U.C. No. 2-96.6 IN190DUTION On Jeonnry 7, 1987, the City of Bmcbo Cucswga retained De Leuw, Cattier 6 Cospmy, io associative with L. D. Hing, Inc. of Ontario, to prepare final engineering plena, aPecificatiom end mtistitm for a grade separation to carry the proposed extern ion of Milliken Avenue ecrvea The Atchisve, Topeka 6 Smte Fe Rsi lwey, Sernad District line, soeetis~ known m the "Pmadene Line," in Rancho Cuceeooge. Lefe in 1956 the City had authorized De Lear, Cattier to sutait a No•inative to the California Public Utilitim Ca~iuive for wmiderative m the a®ual Ststewide priority list of grade etwsinge swat urgently in need of separative, a step newsaery to qualify for s passible 3[ate silowtive of stitching funds, Two previom studies for the proposed separative bed been Prepared by prior coosultmts. The scare recent, by Nilldm Associetm, dated October 1594, developed cospar'ative cats for underpass and overpms alternative. theme the Nilldm report bed suggested wrtsio ecooatiic advmtages for wderPaas cwfigorstiw, subsequent physical developstints et the site, mpecislly the in411stive of • oar spur tank et s critical locetiw, end severe cwt wmtrsists indicated that the caeperetive sprits end coats of the two allernativp should be reexsined. ~v,~ " ""--t ~•"~::::..erirw prei iainary geometric leyouia and cost eetirtm for the five swat promising voderpss end overpms elternetives, so that a decisive m to the type of sepentive icy be cede prior to proceeding with final deign. N~ FOp NHN C~,$$Ilq OF ZBB YAIIJIAY Sapid iodmtriel cud residential developssm! enw occuc-riog in Sm Bernardino Cowty hen rseated a growing need for isptoved traffic circulative in Saorbo Cucsonge. Ibis easaimity, veca Doted for vineyards end sell fees, nwr hen m estisted populeLiw of 85,000, with a projected populetim of 160,000 by the year 2010. The basic street and highway network in the City wmists of a grid, with stijor arterials epecad et we-belt si le intervals following the origiosl mrth-south evd amt-west S«:tive end 9uerterSectian lino. Train traffic w the amt-west ATASP lice aftm creates s barrier to local vehicular traffic ve such srtjor north-svetb thoroughteres m Arebibsld, Turner, Bevm, sod Rochester Aveeum. The proposed extesive ^f Milliken Avmuc frati its prsmt tenieus et 7th Strast. across the ATiBF ~ilway northerly to Fvethill Roulevetd will greatly isgnrove north-ywLh circulation, will serve the residmtisl developamts mw under way in youth-cmirol Ikmcho Cuce~onge, end will provide sccess to the propwed Regional Shopping Cmter on Foothill Boulevard. It will eLo serve m the priasry truck ec,xss route to the City's "Industrial Specific Plm" area. Ae proposed by the City, Milliken Avenue will betas a sajar north-soath arterial carrying three lens of traffic in mrlt directiap. the grade seperotim st the AT6SF Railway is essential Doth for safety and for iaproved traffic circulation. BIISTIIp RAILYDaD FACILITffi At® T86FPIC The Smte Fe Railway line through Rancho Cucaaonge is one of two Smte Fe aeinline rail comtectiom between the Sm Bernardino Yards and Robert Yerd nest downtown Los Angelev. Smie Fe'a northerly route, ftetptevtly referred to ee the "Second District" or the "Pasadena Line," follawe the foothills of the Sm Cebriel Momtsins, extepding thraudt Rislto, Fmtme, BevrJro Cuca•ovge, Itplend, Montclair, Clereaont, the northerly outskirts of Panne, and Pesedeas. Por tarry yearo it carried twat of Smte Fe's peumger traffic, including feuwte trewcovtinmtel nests troitr, each as el Cepitm, Chief, end Super Cbief. Tbis line is ua+ used by MffBAB for one dsi ly roundtrip between Los Avgeln sod Chicago vie Bantaw. 1'ha principal Smta Pe freight line tra 3m Bernardino to La Angeles, the third District, follows ^ soro southerly route through Riveroide, Corona, end FY~llertav. It does not traverse Honcho Cwxsos~gs. The Smte Fe Rsilwsy hen experienced sobstmtislly increased train tnffic between Sap BeCOSrdina m,l r... ~..~.1- __ _ ..~~~~ ui Loaa nescn mo Los Angela. The Pasadena line has been saaewhat mderutilixed by Proight traffic because of short passing trecJu, while the Fullerta line bas been congested. To inrrease the capacity of the Pasadena line, end to suppleeat the overloaded Fullerton live, 9aota Pe cspitel iaprova.®t budgets io prior yews resulted in lmgthmieg the passing trodc et Inrindale, with other passing tracks plmoed to be lengthened in subsequent yeen. Nit6 «tmsim of these Passin6 !rocks, reprmmketivd of the Sente Pe had expected that existing traffic between Sm Bernardino and dowvtam Lw Angeles, vie Rancho Cuce•onge sod Pasadena, say double. The basic traffic pattero is saw counterclockwise, with wntboutwl freight troim uovivg fro Sm Benrardino to Loa Mgela vie the Pasedms-Rentme line, with eastbatmd troiw aoving vie the FWllerta live. Smte Pe'a seater plm of track iaprovesmts sad rbmgas in traffic circulation petters. m described ebwe reflects thinkieg prior to filipg of the I.C.C. Applicatien for the Sauthero PecifirSmts Pe Merger. This Merger Appl icstim, finally denied by the I.C. C, av Jme 90, 1987, contained m operokivg plm which would have reduced thrpt~ freight stovesmts en the Pssedena line, roratieg this traffic via the Southern Pacific rein line. Rowerer, coosideretims relating to the proposed Merger cm now be disregarded. A track consolidation propossl in also currently pending to shmdon Southern Pacific's Toner Pacific Electric line, the Baldwin Park BrmrL, through Reecho Cucsooge and Pmtme, in which aunt SP train world be rerouted to the Smte Fe Pemedme line. At the presort tine, the Pneedeae Lida througb Naocho Cucerenga carries only two AMTRAH Maim per day, one in mde direction. Freight traffic consists of eight to tm through Lroiea and Pour loebl !rein 6mdled by rood ewitchero, giving s total of 14 to 16 through train novesxmte per day. The SP Baldwin Perk Branch track coneolidetiao, if approved, would add om daily round trip of a short 10 car Iocnl freight train. There ere also local a,eitching wveemts to Pick up or net out care et the Rancho Cucefonga Distribution Cmter, served by o spur track leading to the south, m well en to the indmtrip nerved by a Y-!reek leading to the north. These switching swveaenta are eatismted to range frc~ six to tm per day. Possible Reil Conesuter Traffic Somme years ego, propossla were advanced that cas~~ter train operate between Sm Bernerdieo end Los Angeles order the apeaesorohip of the Cal ifornie Dapartesmt of 7rmsportetioa. The Smte Pe Railway opposed Lhis operation, m the groemds that the Pasedme line is mly aiaglrtreark and hen only sufficient capscity to beadle the freight traffic which the Rei !way prefers to route vie this line, Sintt the operation of ceauter train eppeere norc highly conjectural thm before, they have ben diwr,•swr,lerl :s :;!~_- ----t. Foner Heiser Stexl Plmt. Pootme The Pesadme line aLo serves the fotner 8niaer Steel Canpemy FonLme plmt. Rough steel slabs fra overseas new arrive st the Lae Asgeles-Long Beech Berbor. Unit trains, each abou! 30 cars long, move five days a week to the Raiser plmt, via the Southern Pacific asioline, frc~ La Angeles to Rtiwmda Avenue. Althoagh the alternative route vie the Smte Fe Pmedma line does not terry this traffic et preen!, it night be used for this purpose in the future. Sut•arv of Train Moveamta sod Delays Fran the foregoing, censorable projections of total train awvaamta and durations of 61rr_kege of Nillikm Avenue et the subjs.;! Bite within the next decade ere: AIRRAH Through Preight Road SNitchero, Through Local Switrhin6 of Boed Switrbero Diveroim of SPTCo. Treina following Baldwin Park Branch Abe~doo.ent Bniaer Steel Unit Treim Total One-Wev Tri 2 B to 30 4 6 to 30 (Conjectural) 2 None 22 to 26 Crosain¢ Blocking Delay (Ninutm oar day) Aseused 2 gin. per treia aoyeslent = 44 to 56 gin. Rnil Facilities et the Site The propmed aeperetim Bite is situated in the center of a tepidly gracing werehome and distributim developsent served with aeverol spur tracks. The seia line through the site is m a tengmt eligamt supported oo a lac eabmlumt. Smte Fe plsm the imtelletim of e sernnd track located parallel to end an the south of the rein line. This mould create a short aectim of double !reek rein line. The roilroed right-of-wey width is 100 feet. The siggel srita is autoaintic block. Indmtriel spurs which have a sigsificent effect m the alignamt, profile, and coat of a grade separotim ere m follows: Industrial spur extsgdigg to the north ecrou Arran 8igbrey to the Rencho Cucsmge Business perk, s large wscehome developmt between Foothill Boulevard snd Arrow Bighwey. The dmwlm,.."t'. .-~-;-i:; yi®s inotcate that rail switching service is likely to increase very eubatmtielly. This spur is corrected into the rein line by two turnouts, creating a "Y". The proposed Milliken Avenue extemim would Gave to crom under or over the Best le{ of the "Yv. Because Bose of the iedustry trerJca have awitchm opining ko the sort6 while others open to the emth, one leg of the "yv is used sa a runaround track on which cars ere tesporerily stored while the train crew does its work. By letter dated Msrch 26, Smte Pe advised the ceosulimt that rail me of the amt leg of the "Y" could be taporeri ly suspended for a period not to exceed two weeks during conatructim. Spur trerJt extending to the smthemt, elaoet to Paurth Street, aervigg the Rancho Cucsonje Distributien Curter. The turnout few went, end the spur then dmceada m e steep grade towards the eouthemt. The warehouse 6uildiage within the Distribution Center camp..-iae en erne of several 6wdred thousand square feet. The trarJc layout ie sorb m to sa1[e it very difficult to relocate this curved spur track. Sinco the Rmcho Cucsosge Distributim Curter is dmigned to attract railroad-oriented traffic, this spur east be kept in servirt during mostructien. Associated Kith the two turnouts in the issw:diate arm of the proposed aeperotion is a cluster of other related roilroed facilities, including: o Block ^ignsl facing westerly, that is Yor emtbound aein line traffic. Remotely controlled electric lock m the turnout leading aouthemt to the Distribution Center. o Battery ceaea; jow-eomted sigrel, evidently for roil traffic epproechiog awthemterly free the amt leg of the north wye; end derail ettarbed to amt leg of wye. Thine aeverel facilitim, and the need to relocate the• for the underpma alternative, which would require coaatroctim of a shoofly (teRorory detour track), hove a eigoificmt effect en coat. T'ne developamt of e setiafactory shoofly layout to eccoaaodete the aeinlice and the aouthemterly spur leading to the Distribution Curter aey well prove difficult. For the mderpess elteroetive (Plate No. 2) the eaomt of rail switrLing activity et the site substentieles Smte Pe'e requent for etwo-trxJc structure, plm m edditionel curved structure for the amt leg of the Y. Avere[e Deily Vehicular Voluaea The Cily Ragiaeer's projection of vehicular traffic et the crwaing is epproxiaetely 19,500 vahiclm per day by date of opmisg is 1989. Traffic volumes for the year 2010 ere expected to rmge between 38,000 sad 45,000 vehicle per day. Traffic that will utilize the proposed croaaina would otherviw. rrnw. fh. amce r'e tracks et Hevm, Rochester end Btiweodn Avmuea, ell is the City of Rmdw Curmooge. Thee streets all perollel Milliken; Hevm Avenue to the west, sad Rochmter end Rtiwm~de Avenum to the amt. Vehicular Speeds After opining of the grade separetioa to traffic, vehicvler speedo ere expected to be in the vicinity of 55 aph. Milliken Avemae ie expected to be signed Yor a sexia~a speed of 45 aph when ultiaete traffic unloose ere eiteined. B•eraency Service -Fire Deoertamt The introduction of a grade-separated aorlhyout6 arterial will provide m elteroetive route for esxsrgmcy vehicles is Rmtho Cuc~apaga. At the present time, Ehe only grade sepereted crooning io the vicinity is IDterotete 15, which curve sorthemtecly toaarde Pontsaa is~edietely north of the AT63F creasing. The Division Chief of Lhe Iootbill Fire PTOCMtlOn District aupporte the need for a gr'ede aeperotios et Milliken Avenue. SITE COtg1ITICNB Taw¢rephy The site lies on m eliwial fm et the bens w the Sm Oebriel Momteim. Milliken Avenue hen a aaturnl down grade, averaging about 1-1/2 percent, frw Bighlmd Avenue to the Sm Bernardino Freeway. The Smta Fe Railway wen built os a low esbeolaent through the Aencho Cucawga Brea, priserily to allow rmoff flowing swtherly frw the foothill ores to pens underneath the railroad is culverts and shallow drainage etrvcturm. At Milliken Avenue, the elevation of top-of-rail ie approxisetely 2 feet above the original ground level. These topographic features of the site effect roadway approach grades, drninege, and foundation conditions. Fomdetion and Seiaic Conditions Although fomdetion borings have not bcen obteieed at the bridge Bite itself, the geologic structure ie identified m Cenozoic quetervery alluvial deposits. It wen forserly m agricultural arse. Total thirJcnees of the eliuvia probably exceeds 1,000 feet. The Sm Jacinto Fault trsvernea the west Sm Bernardino urbm arse frw the northwest to the southeast, trending about 1-1/2 silm northwmt of the project Bite. The Cuwsange Falt, skirting the bens of the San Oebriel Momteim sod foothills above Fontme, is ebwk 5 silm north of the project. Soils in the vicinity of the Bite ere sandy with e comiderable portico of cro661m. Prior to mderteking Pinel design, detailed voila fomdetion explorations will be necessary to detenine thw wllnrwhl. I,ewr:ne .,. ~:ty e..- . ---_.! footings or pile requiresmts for bridge structurm. At~the present tise, date et paerby eitm suggest the voile will be adequate for support w spread footings. The Cherry Avenue Warhead, epeming the sae Smte Fe Railway line about 3 ^ilen to the east, is fomded on aprmd footings in herd sandy-gavel ly netenala. Due to the proxisity of the site to the Sm Jecioto and the Cucaonge Feultn, possible bedrod~ and ground surface ecceleretiom due to eerthquekes en these faults nay be high. To sinisize possible desege frw earthquake activity, eppropriete seissic design criteria will be utilized, recognizing the probable rherecteristice of gromd notion and structure reepoaae. existing and Plmned Lend Uam The arse surrounding the site for sore than we ails to the north and south, and along s broad emt~+est bend perel leling the Smte Pe Railway, in mdergoing rapid isdustriel- end warehouse-type developsxbt. The southemt quedrmt of the site is oavpied by the fully developed Rmrbo Curenonge Distrihutiw Center, the southwmt quadrat is being developed by Oenersl Dynmics Corporotioo, end the stem to the north arc the subject of treat mps oriented for roilyerved industrial and werehame mm, with additional spur tracks propmed. North of the reilraed is the Smta Fe Lend laprovesmt Cos~eny'• awn property, In the emthemt quedrmt, rightbf-way hen been dedicetad end a fence is is place 40 ncco~odete top-of-cut or toe-of-slope linen for the future grade separation. Further to the north slang the foothills, Rmrbo Cucesonge is mdergoing intensive subdivision activity, with pmaibly 20,000 rmidentiel unite planned or order construction. Bxiat ins and Plaened Utilitim The propmed Milliken right-of~vey within the project arse is trovereed by only three significant utility linen--e 6S H4 Southern Califoroie Bdiaon overhead trmseission line, s 21 inch disaster non-recleineble sewer line, and the MWD aqueduct dmcribed below. Metroool itm Water Di trict A ueduct A 12'-8" dimeter MWD aqueduct perol Lela the Smta Fe Railway lice about 710 feet south of the min line. For the uoderpma alternative, the profile of the depremed roadway epprmch would be mtebliahed to ovoid conflict with this line and to •eintein adequate rnver. For the overpms alternative, m additimel iocrestmt of esbenluent, generating additimel superi~poeed load, ie mevoideble. For purposm of this prcliainnry study, we have manned that incraentel fill ~ to 5 feet (providing a total of 10 feet of cover) would be acceptable. For my fill heights in arceas of 5 feet, we have maa~ed that special protection of iuc yipeiice, eucn m pleceaent of a reinforced concrete slab, mould be required. The foregoing criteria have been utilized for prolisinery melysis mly. Confirsetion with the Metropolitm Mster District in Southern California would be required before proceeding with final dmign. This msussd profilr, control hen a mteriel influence on the attainable vehicLler dmign speeds maocieted wi t6 the overpme elteroetivm. Utility Relocetian Hatimtm For cent-mtimtiag purposes, we have maned tbnt throe privately owned uti litim that occupy ^trmts order franchise, each m overhead or underground electrical dietributim linen, telephone linen, water mine, and domestic gm dietributim linen. would 6e relocated et the coat of the owners. C,:r cwt ea Holm irci::de provision For reloeeting City or other publirowned fecilitim et the expmne of the project, m well m relocations of the Southero California Hdieon lice which is on private right-of-way, Pletm 2 through 6 show euggmted routes for the savernl utility end don drain relocation meocieted witb the werpms end mderpess plum. DHSI®1 STAOIHD,4 AlHI CYIIBRIA Structural and geoaatric dmign criteria for the proposed aeperetiw ere d follows: Railroad Bridge (Dnderpass Alternative) Dmign SPecifiratioes "Aeericen Reilwsy Hoginerrieg Associetim Meauel" Dmign Loading, Smte Pe Railway N,a~ber of Trecka Track Speciog Cooper's B-RD plus iepect 2 + 1 trecJe for east leg of wye (Total 3 trecka) 15' ceoterto-curter Becwuee of the pretence of industrial drill ead awitchieg trerS[s ao both sidm of Milliken Avmue, Smte Pe requirm a double-track uaderpass. Such etwo-track underpass would be consistent with Sectiao 2450 of the Streets and Riahweva Code, subperegrsph (b), whirl resde in pert m follows: "...On any Project where tbere is wly one railroad trade in eairtmce, the project shell be built ao m to provide for expamiw to two trades when the Director of Traosporletiao determines that !be project is oo m exLtiot or poteatiel passenger corridor..." ' avpna nie curves aingle-track structure is required to Carry the Beat leg of the wye; rctireseat of this tredr is uoeccepteDle to the Railway. Ihderoaaa Reauirvmts Vertical Cleerence Por Vehievler Traffic 15 feet aieiav, plus 0.25 Yeet to allow for future pev'a®t rdurfsciag. Aasuaed Tr Bs'se Across Bri e Top-of-rail elevstiw to tw roieed 0.1 feet. Shwfly Rewiresent (.t ahocfly t.a~ is a teeporsry track to carry treia eroued the site of coostructiw of eo underpass.) Nusber of Tracks Two shoofly trade will be necessary; our for f' a sale line asd ooe for the got lag of the "T" 8 Design Speed Because of the operotim of AMTRAg treim, Smte Fe advises that 66 aph sin. design speed will be reeasamded for the sein line shoofly Miecellmeom Provieiooa The Railway Prefers that the bridge decks of mderpms structures be cosposed of precmt, praatreesed concrote box girder mite, placed m sisPle spew and supporting a ballmt trough, with 8 inrLm of ballmt miler bottos of tie. The Railway has ateoderd plem for these box girder mite, priota of which were supplied to the Consultmt. The Railway discourages the me of cast-in-plece continom concrete construction. Off-Track Meintmmce Roadway The railway ordinarily requires that s treveroeble roadway be provided for pmsage of off-trerdc seintmmce equipaxmt (trudts). Por the overpma plena, this apace will be available under the overhead atructuro, between the operetisg track and nearest fees of pier or ebutamt. Became oP the availability of parallel city streets, viz. Pourth Street sad Jersey Boulevard, e• well m a pleased traversable drivewsy along the top-of-slope, sdditimal width of bridge deck to ecca~odete off-trscJc seinteneem vehicles will mt be required at Milliken Avenue for the underpma eltermtive. Vehicular Bridle (Overhead) Design Specificatims "Califorpie Bepertxat of Tremporketim, Bridge Pleming end Dmign Mmml," with rbmgm to 1986, and AASBTO "Stsnderd Specificetiom Por Bighwsy Bridges." Street Dail Nishwey Oeosetric 5tenderds "CelTrms Pleming Mmml," and AASBTD Recoa®ded Stmderde Non-pmsisg eight distance m cant vertical curvet: 40 aph sinisis for overhead, 56 aph for underpass Por the overpass, W oleo show elteroetivm for 55 afro. 75 aph is recusesoded m e suitable cwfrrosiae Sag vertical cvrvm: to be lighted -headlight sight distmce sot applicable 9 Lmm - 4, with provision for future widening to 6 leap; or initial 6 learn, m applicable Raised sedim width, semured hetwem fecza of nubs: 18 feet et approach interoectima, tapering to 14 feet through the sag point of the underpass Ror the overpms, tapering to 4 feet over the bridge structure Sidewalks - 2 at 6-1/2 feet for ove[pesa; 2 et 5 feet for mderpms Vertical Reilrosd Clearexm Por Overhead Structurm The proposed aeperatioo is m area whero the Smte Fe don not require provisions for future electrificetim. The ~inisa vertical clearmce, semured fray toprof-rail to ugderoide of overhmd structure, therefore, need be only 22'-6", plus 6 inchm for futuro bellmt roisea, giving e total of 23 feet. Horizonte) Cleermces For Aeilrosd Traffic Aa required by Omerel Order 260, Celiforoie Public Utilities Ca~iasim, with additional space for off-track ~sintenmce roadway (applicable to overhead only) m requited by the roilraed. 0 8 feet 6 ischm clear fro. the centerline of trerJc to face of hmdrailing (mderpms plms ply; applicable to tmgmt track). o ltl Yeet clear fro emterline of track when ~aistenence roadway is required. (Overpms plem ply. Applicable to me side of track only. We have essred the seintemnce roadway is m the south ^ida of the anin line.) 0 8'-6" clear frog centerline of trarJe to edge or Croroer of aeermt coiusm or pier footing or roteining wall footing, if trarJe sot relocated or taken out of service during comtruction (applicable to tmgmt trarJ~). o Minima horizmtel cleermce between feces of piers et the subject site would be 18 feet, swmured frc~ inside face of northerly or emtherly pier to track CL o Loogitudinel droiaege ditchm paralleling the track and alaog the wrth and south sides of the railroad right-of~ay can be located either in frost of or hehind the Piero of m overpms. 10 Taporsrr Construction Cltwuakxxs (Horizmtsl) For stage construction, ao updergroand construction ip ops stage to 6e lokx+ked closer khan R'~" frc~ txaterline of the nearest operating tredk. Teaporary Coostructiaa Clearances (Vertieel) end Type of Overhead Structure Occeaimel overheight losde arc karried over this lice. However, s teaporery ispeired vertical elmrmkce of about 21'x^ doting construction Daly would pra6ebly be acceptable to Smta Fe. Miattlleneous Provieiam Por Overheads To a•iniaize depth of auperetructurc apemipg the railroad, we rekx~send e coat-in-place prmtreaeed concrete box girder structure, supported en cmt-io-plece concrete piers and ebutsv~ta. Foundation borings ere expected to show that these Piero epd ebutsnka km be founded m spread footings; pilm ere not expected to be rekpkired. 3mte Fe requirm chain link-type fencing alen6 both sides of the rokdwey to deter objects beipg thrown fra overbeud bridgm onto the tredks• Recasnmded Typical Roedwer Sectim for 0nderkwus The reca~mded raedwsy section for the underpass should be kxageiible with ed,jecent sectioro of the street, but nos wdifiotiom within the lmgib of the grade saperatien era werr®ted ar required 6y crostructim copstreipts. Soae relevant mpects of the adjacent aectien of Milliken Avenue ere u follows: o Within the {renter pert of the length of the project, the existing right-of~rey is 120 fee! wide, assured between property lines. The City of Rancho Cutakaonga'• Nastec Plm calla for a psvenmt width of 94 feet. This width sllows six lenen of traffic, without perking, and m 1R feet sdien, adequate for left-tors packets. A tworopm atrueturc to terry the Senka Pe track is proposed. 6iece this etructurnl configurstien requires a curter pier, the aedim is cmtinued throughout the length of the depressed roadway, There is po send to provide for perking through the lmgib of the underpass. The typical roadway cress-section of Milliken Avenue thrwkgh the uoderpeu will be eubstmtielly the sss es other section of this ass thoroughferc. The ecC~sl roadway disensions proposed sro shown op tha following page. 11 C L Millik¢n Ma• 't'-Fo SZ'~ Vag, 99'± fa 52'j Wr /ar 7ta9' Vo/c7to9~ 40' ~ f , 40' I' 21 ~ R/ W ac~5~~~ von I dpi '/• 5:1 TYPICAL SECTION sc~~ ~z ONDB-PASS AND OYBBPA39 STODY PLANS Two boric alternative study plena, m overpass, with aubelteraetives, plena follow the sa•e reverse curve tors groups of elteroetives are: one for m underpass end the ascend for were studied is detail. Both basic e]igaeent previously established. The Undervesa (Plate 2) This alternative calla for Milliken Avenue to be depressed es a six-lore roadway penning order a oew double-tredc railroad bridge and under e separate single-trerJ~ curved bridge which cerria the amt le6 of the wye. Far thin pim, proceeding free south to north, the depressed roedweY begins about 700 feet north of Seventh Street, in the general vicinity of the MhD aqueduct, aeinteining adequate cleermce sod cover over the latter. The roadway then decmda m a three per cent grade to peso mderneeth the Smte Fe ~sinl iae end the cent leg of the "Y" beck, thence ascending on a four per cent grade and returning to seat eziating grade about 100 feet south of Jersey Boulevard. The Smte Fe eainline sod the future track ere carried over the deprmaed rosdwey m one dou6lrtreck bridge structure. A separate sioglo-treck structure terries the east leg of the "Y^ over the deprnsed rosAvsY• Because of the nned to provide apace for the supporting pier, a eedim width of 18 feet, tapering to 14 feet et the sea point, thmct widening to IB feet, is carried through the length of the ~mderpaea. The nedim end aide elopes mould be lsndacepad e• described for the overpass elterontive, below: Two sidewalks also will peas order the railroad, but et a gredeliae higher then the vehicular roadway, in a Benner eviler to those io the "N" 3trmt llnderpma in Colton and the Drove Avenue Underpass in Ontario. Meter Te61e: Because of the presort and historic groundwater levels in the 6es iv, then is ao reason to expect that groundwater probleea will be encountered in the depressed roadway of m underpmn. Cooaequmtly, e peveaeat aubdreinage syate• will not be required. Local Dreinme: Rmoff rotating the catduent etas of the depressed roadway of the uoderpess will be cmveyed to a gravity etor~drain leading to the south. Because of the netursl 1-1/2 per amt dawngrede of Milliken Avenue towards the south, a pining plmt would not be required if a long gravity discharge line is ivetelled. He rl road Shoofly Reauiresxmta for Underpass To terry rail traffic eromd the exmvetim arse of m underpme akructure, it is necessary to build a detour iced` (shoofly track). The existia6 aaia track i• then taken out of service. Since AMFRAH trains operate through flnncho Cucaeonge, Smte Fe advises that a shoofly design speed of 66 ~. will be required, which in taro requires a total lepgth, seesured between begimiog and and of revarsiag curves, of epproxisetely 1,900 feet. 13 Additional fedora which contribute to the relatively bigh shoofly coats ere the relocated turnout to reconnect the indmtriel spur which curve aouthemterly from the underpea to the Rmrlro Cucsonge Distribution Center, sod the removal end subnequmt reinatelletion of the emterly leg of the "Y" whir2~ serve the spur track leading to the north. Smte Fe adv ism that the emkerly leg of the "Y" coo be kekm out of service for n period not to exceed tyro weeks during cooetrvctim, with ewitrLing eervitt provided from the wet leg only. Therefore, a shoofly ie also required for the amt leg. The shoofly elan required that the automatic block signal et M.P. 94.2, and related circuitry, facing en+tbound trains oleo be te~porerily relocated, and aubaequmtly returned to its existing Pmitim. In preliminary discussions with the Reilwey, we inquired m to the fen ibility of deigning the shoofly for some speed leas that 65 mph, to reduce cost. The Regional Bngioeer stated that some lesser speed might require "liquidated demegp"-that ia, the mnirector is to rei~uree the Railway in the event cooatructim ie not completed within a specified number of el toted days, or clause to this same effect to be inverted in the Construction 6 Meiotmeoce Agreement. At the moment, it is acmevbet uncertain m to the impl icetions of the "liquidated damages," and whether e lower deign speed om the shoofly sight be acceptable. Overoma Alternative (Plate 3 through 6) These elternetives cell Yor Milliken Avenue to be elevated to cane over the Smte Fe Railway. Appromrbing from the soutb, and for the overpass with 66 mph deign eight diatmce, the mending grade begin about 500 feet north of Seventh ct.wr .. •t_ e__~_ c_ __ _r:__ __~ ~~_ __ «_ returoiogwto aeet^existiog ground et^propomed Jereey~Bouleverd` Two different profiles were developed for the overpms, one with e 600-foot long creel vertical crave corresponding to a nompeming sight distmrl of 40 mph, and the second with a 1,320-foot lmg crest vertical curve corresponding to a 55 mph noopeeaing eight diatmtt. The letter requires a moderate increase in eppromrb embmkmmt materiel. The major profile control for the overpme coma ista of the 12'-6" diameter MWO aqueduct. Additional Yill over the aqueduct ie msumed to be limited to a mmimu• depth of 5 feet. The epproerlr esheolueat would close off the vacated 8th Street right-of-wey and the SCB ememmt which parallels Smte Fe on the south. The exietinn 21 inch non-RBCi. waver which ocarpim the 8th Stmt right-of-grey would be relocated or strengthened. An ellowesce hen been included io the coat etimete for the pipe relocetien. For ell four overpme elternet ive, the eteblimhed medim width of 1H fmt south of Seventh Street is extended northerly, but tapers iJ 4 feet on the bridge structure over the rsilroed, thence widening sgain to 18 14 fttt. Oreeneotel landscaping rnmiatmt io eppeerintt with other attractive se,jor arteriole is Rancho Cucsonge could be plmted within the aedim, m well m m the eabsoluent side elopes. The general eppeerantt of the overpees would be so~ewhet eviler to auaerom existing arterial eeperotiom in Montclair, Ontario, Rialto, cad Sm Bernardino. The vehicular bridge apeming the railroad would be about 240 fact lmg of precmt, prmtrmsed roinforced concrete construction; or cast-ia-place prmtrmaed, m detet~inad dwiag final dini~. The location of piers and heighk of the superstructure would sot obstruct visibility of the eutc~etic block aipiel et M. P. 94.2 for emtbound trains-'e concern that has been expressed by the Railway. It is believed that the 66 BV Southern Cal iforaie 8diaon electrical trenesiaaion line which parallels the Railway and which wen recently reined is high maugh ao that it need not he rained fwther for the overpma, but this point needs to be confirsed. Gendaceoinx ind Aooeermce As prNioinly emtioned, cost intiaetm for the several alteraetivm include a gmerom ellaweace to emuro that the aide alopm--cut elopes for the mderpma, eabmlaent elopes for the overpme-~rould be landscaped ind irrigated. Si~ilierly, the lspdeceped sedim would be ~eintained et e substmtially comfort width of 18 to 14 feet through the underpass elteraetive. For the overpms alterneiivm, alas no meful purpose ie served by carrying m 18-foot wide ~edim over the railroad, the rolatively wide sediin would be carried clove to the sttvctwe on either side, but world taper to a 4-foot width across the bridge itself. Medim arms order the bridge structures for the uaderpma alternative, and on the bridge portion of the overpass altetnetiva, would have ^i~ulnted brick, expwed eggragete, or atone paving, consistent with other attractive boulevards ie Rmcho Cucmooge. In evaluating the co~peretive writs and coats of in overpine vs. m uodarpme, of special •igaificmcz ie the evnilebility of borrow snteriels to comtruct the abenlo•mt epproarbin to m overpins, m caagiercd with the problems of disposal of nxeevsted seteriele for m underpins. !'or !hc ovcr~eas alternatives, epproxi~etely 140,000 to 220,000 cubic yards of seteriel would be required for the construction of the north and south esbenluent epproecLea. Remo Cumwnge plem several ue,ior etorf drainage end flood detention bmim, but has ao cooviniint site where excevetion frw these bmim can be disposed of. 'Phe propwed averpms 16 alternetivd cm utilize seteriela to be excavated frs the detention 6esins, with potential ecoooric buret: to to the flood oostrol projects m well ea to the railroad separation. For exerple, we uederstaad that nose 200,000 abic yards oP reterisl sight becose available frs the proposed Best Alta Lora Beaia, whirl would subetmtielly seat the esbmlueat needs of the overpass alternative. Since disposal of seteriels fray the datmtios basins right otherwise create aoswswhet of a probls, the coot of the flood control basis excevetioa cm be shared iv Bose proportion between the flood control and the overpass esbevloeat projects. Far the overpass elternetivea, our estiratea eeeuse a wat of f5/cubic yard for the excevetioa and plecsent of excavated neteriala io the approach esbmkaxmte. We have assured that the full coat of the esbmksent sight be charged against the grade aeperetioa project, but we also show the finmciel benefits if half of the above caste were allocated to the flood control project, end half to the roilroed grade eeperetiop. This 50-50 split is purely srbitnry; a higher percentage allocetim against the flood control project, m suggested by a sxssber of the Plemiag Co>•issioo, would reduce the overpass project cost. For the woderpaes alternative, acre 77,000 C.Y. would be excavated. We have ensured a cost of f4.00/C. Y., although this unit price ary be on the low aide. We ssusb that sufficient acreage exists within property owned by Omerel Dyasim end/or Smte Pe Pacific Corporation to peni! the ezcesa srteriele to be spread end vested adjacent to the site. Casvu+rieon of Overpass Plm va. Usdernesa •~ A.~.a ctd -:.... liu vusi, 7, gnpuicei eugsmta, profiles, and coat esthetes were developed for overpass and underpins eltervativee following the ass rnrridar. M isportmt question relates to the choice of m overpass versus m mderpeaa. This queatim can beese eorcwhet cmtroversisl, end ray be aubjoct to strong penmal preferences, opinions, and even esotioas. Berk type of separation hen its edvmtegee end diaedvmtegea. Sanetiaes there are significant differences in coat. At Bose urbm sites the local conditions dictate the selection of m overpma--m urderpese is not e fesi6le or ecrosic eltemative. 8xsplm include localisms when the gromdweter table is high or where there en ssnhy conditions. Oo the other bend, there ere seny sitm where the only reesoneble choice is m underpse. 8xesplee include locations where the short, restricked diatmce to City streets which penllel the railroad precludes the longer approaches reggired For m ove;-pasa. Nope of these situations prmeil in 8mcho Cucsovge. 8ither type of aeperetiom ie teehsically feasible elon6 Milliken Avenue. The following peregnphe eusnerize the principal edvmteges end diaedvmtegee of eec6 type: 16 1. Time of Controclin: The overpass cm be copstructed in a shorter length of time, •iace n time-rnn~sipg shooflys or reatorotin of tankage arc required. 2. Overall Costs: We climate that the minis overpra option would be approximately ;1.0 millien leas expensive then the mderpms for initial crostnctiap. 3. Flood Control: The lhreet of severe damage to homes and businesses from heavy storo rmoff ie always present in the fookhill scar elopg the bra of the Sm Osbriel Mowtaina. The excevetiop of neteriele to build the embepknmt approaches tom overpme cmld creme e needed flood detentim basin et a such emlier date then would othen/ine be passible, thereby mitigating the dmger of flooding in ceaidential neighborhoods. In staery, whatever savings may be derived from coordinetiop of mrthwork with the flood cmtrol project, there savings could apply only to the overpra elternativd; they ere pot available for the underpmn. 4. Dreipre and Oroundmter: Hither m mderprs or m overpre would dreip by gravity. A pumpipg plmt is pot required for the upderpaas. At thin site m upderpean would not be subject to the usual diaadvmtegm of flooding and eubdrainege problems which night be enrnmtered from s high water table. 5. Admtebilitr to Chm[ed Puturo Traffic Condikiops: Ap overpass lends itself none readily to chmges in future traffic condition. M overpms can be built using stage conatrucliap, that is, with m initial 4 lanes, with provision for future widening to 6 lmem. Oe the okher bend, m upderprs, wce copetructed, csmot readily be widened. A vehicular structure spenping the roilrnd (overprn) cm uenllr he w;d.e.,l .t ..,.~...~~ ~.. 6. Pedeatrim and Ricrcle Use[e: M overpms requires the pedrtrim or bicyclist to climb about 30 feet to get over the railroad tracks, while m uvderprs requires a descent and [ubsequmt rant of oply 12 to 15 feet. Thus, the physical effort required to cress the railroad is lrs for m mderprs. There ere n sigoificent di fferencea ip safety conditions for pedestrian between the two types of separation. 7, Approach Orodes for Vrbicles: An acceptable approach grade of seven percent is required for north-boup6 traffic rending m overpass frw 7th Street. The nexus grade for m upderprs is Your percent. Hither is readily negotiable by rotor vehiclr, becsune the grade is short. 8. Amlheticn: With proper Imdacepipg and et[vcturel drign, either m overpre or m underpre can become m rest to the cpswmity. 8ither structure would be compatible ip eppeermce with the Rancho 17 Cucamonga Distribution Cmtet and other proposed developments. On clear days northbound motoriake on m overpme would enjoy ePectaculer views of the Sm Oebriel mountains. 9. Vehicular Noise Imoect m Surramdin¢ N ithbo hood; It is agreed that moat of the generally the cvt. Alt6 rO°~ay noise in m mderpma is retained in ough a low barcier will attenuate acme of the noise from m overpma, moderate noise will still radiate outwardly into the surrounding neighborhood, Nowever, since the adjacent arm is entirely industrial warehousing, thin in not a eignificmt factor. 30. Railroad Noise Imoect on the Surcomdin[ Nei[hborhood: Mith the eliminetim of grade crossings, locomotives need not aou~ their air warning horns et Milliken Avenue. This applies for either the overpays or the mderpeaa. Other typo of railroad noise include coupling impacts, engine and eshaaet noise, and rolling of wheels an the track structure, which would be somewhat attenuated by overpms embmkmenta. 11. Effect on Und rmromd Utility L' The ova mintmel daaruptlom of esiat in under rpms requirm only dieruptim of service. The ands gromd utility lines sod mdergromd lino to be reroutedre~roundethereoiccevation meting 12. Effect on Availability f State Metchina Fends: Cost ie a primary factor used by the Cehfornie Public Utilitie Coaiuim to ota6lish the stmtewide priority remking of mwt urgently needed reilraed grade aePeratioas. Other Yecton being equal, a project which hen m Imwer estimated cost receives a higher priority ranking. The Co~insioo received abort 60 momimetiow for comsideretien on the Fiacel 1987-NB list, but State A,n,i. . maiat only three to five of the hi ""° "" "° °vuiiai,ie co reeiader will have to wait for moth~ertsev~erntlg projects; the higher riorit Yeera. A slightly P Y Position cea seen the differentt between receiving and not receiving State fording. Im the core of Milliken Avmuc, the more economical overpma el ternetive hee a bektnr chmm of receiving retroactive State matching fords then the mderpms, but a future retromtive ellocetion cmnot be guermteed. (For additional diecussim of the Sts^e P.U.C. progre• of aid to local agencies, refer to the Section On F1nenCing.~~ the cca~in ity~bmed onmfactors md~rpese or m ovetpma must be made by control benefits. and vehintlnr o °~y, emthetia, potential flood .t should be with the underat Pere`ioa. If the underpass in selected, million must be obtained entirely from lacel m~ cee1eithouttfinmciel maiatmce frw the Celiforoie grade separation progrs. On the other hand, if funding is a major coasideretim, the werpms mnfiguratione offer a better oPportmity of proceeding with •tege eonmtructiom, thereby reducing the initial investment required, and also offering a reesomeb le 18 possibility that a retroactive sllocation of m eurJt m t1.5 eillioo eight eventually be received frw the State grade aeperetiw food. Rights-of-We All required rights-of-wey south of railroad have already been dedicated. In the southwmt quedrmt, the General Dynaeip parcel, the existing street right-of~ey exceeds uederpms requireaente, but m additional reservation eight be needed for m ovcrcrmsing. Ao additional right-of-wmy for fill slope in the event ie a noted condition of dedication for DR 87-12, application dated 2/11/87, aubait tel perming additional or eiaaing iteee frw the developer prior to accepting application. In the aouthemt quedrmt, occupied by the Rmcho Cucaonga Distribution Center, needed right-of~ey wen dedicated by Parcel Mep 5780 and Parcel Map 7555. Rights-of-wey north of the re.ilrwd hove not yet been dedimted, but the City Rngineering Departemt notm m tol lows: Such right-oftirey is shown for dedication on Tentative Parcel yep 8576 of record since 1984 with extensions to October, 1987. Dediration, a clear and concise condition of final sap filing and developemt 6y the Smta Fe pacific Lend Coepmy (to include rmervetiw for a shoofly, if needed). Lend carrot be developed m prmently approved for develops,ent without right-of-trey dedicative. An ling m seP is active, thin condition of developnest will rmin. Should the eep expire, then beck to a waiting posture or the ornrors._, w„ia ,.__.._ . by cne Crty for the project. ~ ... ~~ ~`y°" "~ Developemt of Milliken, pert of the Minter Plm for Developeent. The Head for the street to be extended asses clearly defined in the Neater Plm and will casein until developed or Minter Plm rbmgm. The letter is mlikely due to prmmt developemt occurring eromd Milliken, north and south. Again, the Tentative Perc~l Mep shows Milliken m m interior street with specific lmguege in the condition of developemt for full ieproveeente frw Jersey to Arrow. Smte Fe Lmd Ieproveeent Cwpmy ie the current owner sod developer, See candi[ione of Pleming Co~isaion Rmolutioa No. 64-122, Raisin: ~: Lowerinv of Xailroed Became of tight local phye icel controls, it would be isprecticel to separate the grade by either raising the track, m wen done et the Southero Pacific eeperetion et Rialto Avenue several eilm sent of the Bite, ar deprmsiog the track, m occurred where Soulhety pacific crwem underneath Foothill Boulevard in Sm Beroardieo. Is the forsx:r location, 19 the railroad is carried over Rialto Avenue os a viaduct. The swin line of the Soothers Pacifie wn also deprmeed through Alhesbre several yearn ego. In Renrbo Cuee.onge, a sejor ch®ge in track elevation is finmcislly infeetible, heceuse of the presence of the aevercl switching tracks nerving sd,jecmt isdwtries, end lisited right-of-uey Midth. Such a ae,jor change is grade, involving relocating the industrial tred[s end extending e tredc elevation or depression plm several lhoweod feet in mch direction, ss would be required to develop satisfactory grades for the railway, would involve costa on the order of f30 to f50 Billion - cwpletely beyond the fiomcial reaoureea of the ce~usity. oosr 6ST1MA7'BS M satinets of cost of comtructian is presorted on the following pages for the Underpass and Overpass eltersetives. The constructioe cast estisstee arc based m the design atmderda end criteria eat forth in m earlier section of this report. Reviaiom of these etmderds or mewptiona neturelly world codify the estisetes. No provisim is cede for right-of-wey coats, m all property required for crostruction of the grade seperctios hen already been dedicated, or is subject to dedication, m previowly described. The eati~etes ere based os m essuaed cossgncvmt of cwatroctim early in 1986. Baceletieg cwstroctim costs will necessitate a resseesoeni of project costa if construction is scheduled after 1988. Engineering costs ere derived fros Mmwl 45, Consultin[ Bn[ineerin[ e Guide for the Bs[e[em[ of Bn[ineerie[ Service, Aaericm Society of Civil 8ngioeers, 1975 Edition, end our own experience. For the overpesa elternelivea, coats of abmkamt epproechn era subject to conaidereble variation, depending upon the relelive ellocetione of cost between the flood ceetrol detmkion basin projects and the railroad grade aeperetim, ee previowly described. The preliainery etudie end coat mt Letee in this report ere intended to explore the technical and finmciel feasibility of the seperetion et the subject Bite, but ere not final cost ntinetm. To provide for ainor incidentals, and eLe for wfordeen eleamte of construction work, we hove included appropriate el loasnces for "emtingmcies.^ 20 TABLB 1 PRBLIMINARY COST BSTIMAIB MILLIBBN AYBNUH ORADe SEPARATION AT SANTA FB RAILNAY UND817PASS ALTBANATIVB - 6 LAMBS (See Pleie 2) Usit Total DeaCri Dt lOn IIOlt ~IMOtlty PC_C! Cmt Bridge for Mein LiDe Track S.F. 6,050 f 120 ! 72fi,000 (36.83' x 164.25') Bridge for Rmt Leg of "Y" S. F. 4,035 120 484,200 Track (28' x 144.10') Roadway Excavation C.Y. 76,600 4 306,400 AC Peveaent (2 x 36' x 2567) S. F. 184,800 2 369,600 Curb 6 Gutter (2 x 2500) L.F. 5,000 8 40,000 Median Curb L.F. 5,000 7 35,000 Cobble Peveaent S.F. 8,000 6 48,000 Sidewalk (5'x 2500' x 2) S. F. 25,000 2 50,000 Sidewalk Gutter L.F. 5,000 8 40,000 Oreinege L.S. - 205,000 Slope Lmdsceping Acre 2.16 66,000 141,000 Medim Landscaping Acre 0.87 8'),000 76, D00 ^ti lity Modificetiaas L.S. - 180,000 Shoofly A Railroad Modifications L.B. - 600,000 Clearing 6 Grubbing L.S. - 20,000 Street Lighting Ba. 25 3,000 75,000 Traffic Striping 6 Sipe L.S. - 20,000 Reteinipg Nell (20' x 17) S. F. 340 40 13,600 linderbridge Slope Peviag S.P ? pC^ b,u0u e encm L.F. 3,600 10 36,000 Top Soil (1') C.Y. 3,500 7 24,500 MobilizetioD (5% Subtotal Above) Z.S. 170.000 Subtotal !3,669,300 Cantiagencim (15% Subtotal) 535.400 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST l4, 104,700 Cell l4, 100,000 21 TABLB 2 PA6LININAAY COST &STTNATB MILLIHBN AV8NU8 ORADB 38PAMTION AT SANTA F8 RAILNAY OVERPASS ALTSRNATIVB No.2A; 6 LANB, 55 lBnl DBSION SP® (Sa Plate 3) Unit Total Dacrist ion Unit Oumtity Price Coat Cleer 8 Grub L.S. S - f 20,000 Co~pected Fill C.Y. 220,000 5.00 1,100,000k Select Fill (Top Soil) C.Y. 7,000 7 49,000 AC Pevc~ent S.F. 167,500 2 335,000 PCC Sidewelka S. F. 22,600 2 45,200 Curb A Gutter (8" CF) L.F. 4,500 8 36,000 Medico Curb R Gutter (6" CF) L.F. 4,500 7 31,500 Cobble Pevalent 9.F. 2,800 6 16,600 Fmtts L.F. 3,600 10 36,000 Street Lighting 8e. 25 3,000 75,000 12" YCP Sewer L.F. 2,530 35 88,600 Sewer Meshola Be. T 1,200 8,400 Signs 6 Stripes L.S. - 20,000 18" RCP Incl. Inlet/Outlet 3tr. L.S. - 12,200 Reroute 21" Non-Reclei~ Sewer L.F. 360 50 17,500 Praaure Mmhola Be. 4 1,500 6,000 Lmdncepieg (Slope &bmk~eot) Acre 4.1 65,000 266,500 Lmdsceping (Medico) Acre .62 87,000 53,900 Slope Ditch L.F. 4,300 4 17,200 8ighwey Bridge 3. F. 22,300 50 1.115.000 tw Slope Paving (Under Bridge) S.F. 7,850 3 23,600 Appurtmencea L.3. - 120.000 Subtotal (3,493,400 5% Mobilization L.S. 174.600 Subtotal (3,668, 000 15X Cont ingmcia ,550.000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTLON COST (4,218, 000 tl.eaa potmtiel credit, if acevetion allocated 50t to Overpass; 50% ((2.50 C.Y.) to Flood Control det~ni ian basins. (Adjmted for Mob it tzet ios 6 Contingency) 6641000 Total After Credit For Flood Cmtrol Bmie Bzcevet ion (3,554,000 Cell f3, 550,000 22 TABLE 3 PRBLLMINARY COST BSSIMATB MILLIBBN AVBNIRI ORADB SEPARATION AT SANTA F8 MILWAY OVERPASS ALTERNATIVE No.2B; 6 LANG, 40 MPA DBSION SPBBD (See Plate 4) Onit Total Dmcription Unit Quent itv Price Coat Clear & Gruh L.S. f - f 20,000 Conpected Fill C.Y. 141,000 5.00 705,000# Select Fill (Top Soil) C.Y. 4,100 7 28,700 AC Peve~ent S. F. 167,500 2 335,000 PCC Sidewalks S. F. 22,600 2 45,200 Curb & Gutter 8" CF L, F. 4,500 8 36,000 Median Curb & Gutter L.F. 4,500 7 31,500 Cobble Peve~ent S. F. '1,800 6 16,800 Fmcm L.F. 3,600 10 36, OOD Street Lighting 8e. 25 3,000 75,000 12" VCP Sewer L.F. 2,530 35 88,600 Sewer Manholes Be. 7 1,200 8,400 Sign A 5tripee L.S. - 20,000 18" RCP Incl. Islet/Outlet Str. L.S. - 12,200 Reroute 21" Noo-Recleia Sewer L.F. 350 50 17,500 Prmeure Mepholee Ee. 4 1,500 6,000 lmdecapiag (Slope Bttbanluent) Acre 2.57 65,000 167,000 Lendscepiog (Median) Acre .62 87,000 53,900 Slope Ditch L.F. 4,300 4 17,200 Righwey Bridge S.F. 22,300 50 1 t1F ^~^ PCC .c t,.ro o,;.gye (;;,,,,~. u, iugei S.!'. 7. B50 3 23,600 App1u'teoepce9 L.S. - 120.000 Subtotal f2, 978, 600 +5X Mabilizetioa 14y000 Suhtatel f3, 127,600 +15X Contiagencim ! 469.400 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 43,597,000 iLees potrdtiel credit if excavation alloca ted 50% to Overpass; 50% (52.50 C.Y.) to Flood Control datenti Jt, Len ins. (Ad,{usted for M„i,ilizeti on 6 Contiagencim) f 426.000 Total After Credit For Flood Control 8xcevetion 53,171,000 Call =3,170,000 I' - ----'--------------------- I Alternative overpass, ee~a ee above, except ------ ------t 43,220,0001. adjusted for 45 aph dmign speed (after credit for flood control excavation) 23 SABLB 4 PIDiLIMINABY COST BSTIMAT6 MILLII~N AVBNUB OBADB SEPARATION AT SANTA FB RAILNAY OVBRPASS ALT6RNATIV6 No. 3A; 4 LANES, 55 F&H D6SI(Oi SPBBD (See Plate 5) Upit Total Description Uvit Quantity Price Cost Char A Grub L.S. f - S 20,000 Cpepected Fili C.Y. 220,000 5.00 5,100,0006 Select Fill (Top Soil) C.Y. 7,000 7 49,000 AC Peveeent S.F. 142,000 2 284,000 PCC Sidewalks S.F. 22,500 2 45,200 Curb 6 Gutter (8" CF) L.F. 4,500 8 36,000 Medico Curb 6 Gutter L.F. 4,500 7 31,500 Cobble Pevaeot S.F. 2,800 6 16,800 Fmcn L.F. 3,600 10 36,000 Street Lighting Be. 25 3,000 75,000 12" VCP Sewer L.F. 2,530 35 88,600 Sewer Mmholes Be. 7 1,200 8,900 Signs 6 Stripes L.S. - 15,000 18" NCP Incl. Inlet/Outlet Str. L.S. - 12,200 Bnroute 21" Noo-Becleii Serer L.F. 350 50 17,500 Pressure Mcoholes 8s. 4 1,500 6,000 Landacsping (Slope 8•bsslumt) Acre 4.1 66,000 266,500 Landscaping (Medico) Acre .48 87,000 41,800 Slope Ditch L.F. 4,300 4 17,200 Highway Bridge S. F. 20,100 50 1,005,000 tiu 6iape Feving under midge ie. :, sin a Zo, wu Appurtmm~cen L.S. - 120.000 Subiotel f3, 315, 300 +5% Mobilizet ion 166.700 Subtotal !3,481,000 +15% Costisgmcies 522.000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST f4, 003,000 sLeae potmtiel credit if excevetico allocated SOY to Overpass; 50% ((2.50 C.Y. ) to Flood Control Sete..-.t ion baaiua. (Adjusted for Mobilization 5 Costingeacies) fi64.000 Total After Credit For Flood Cmtrol Bxcevatico (3,339,000 Cell f3, 340,000 2/ TABLB 5 PRELIMINARY COST BSTIMATB MILLIHBN AY6NU6 GRADE SEPARATION AT SANTA F6 MILNAY OV6RPAS5 ALTHRNATIVB No.3E; 4 LANBe, 40 MPR OSSION SPBBD (See Plate 6) Unit Total Deacriotion Unit Oumtity Price Cont Clear 6 Drub L.S. f - 3 20,000 Coapected Fill C.Y. 141,000 5.00 705,0001 Select Fill (Top Soil) C. Y, 4,100 7 28,700 AC Pavement S. F. 142x000 2 284,000 PCC Sidewalks S. F. 22,600 2 45,200 Curb a Gutter (8" CF) L.F. 4,500 8 36,000 Medico Curb & Gutter L.F. 4,500 7 31,500 Cobble Peveaent S. F. 2,800 6 16,800 S igne 6 Stripes L, 6. - 15,000 Fences L.F. 3,600 10 36,000 Street Lighting 6e. 25 3,000 75,000 12" VCP Sewer L.F. 2,530 35 88,800 Sewer Manholes Ee. 7 1,200 8,400 18" pCP Incl. Inlet/Outlet Str. L.S. - 12,200 Reroute 21" Nan-Aecleii Sewer L.F. 350 50 17,500 Preneure Manholes 8s. 4 1,500 6,000 Lmdsceping (Slope 8abeok>teat) Acre 2.57 65,000 167,000 Lmdsceping (Median) Acre .48 8T,D00 41,800 Slope Ditch L.F. 4,300 4 17,200 Highway Bridge S.F. 20,100 50 1,005,000 PCC Slope Lining (Onder Bridge) S.F. 7:850 '+ '_2 °CO Appurtenmcee L.S. - 120.000 Subtotal 32,800,500 +5% Mobilization 140.000 Subtotal 32,940,500 +15% Contingencies 441.000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST (3,381,500 tLeee potential credit if excevetioo allocated 50% to Overpaee; 50% (S2.5C C.Y.) to Flood Coot ml detention burins. (Adjusted for Mobilizat iuo 4 ConiiOgencied) 426.000 Total Aftar Credit For Flood Control Bxcevetioo f2,955,500 Cell 32,980,000 Alternative overpese, se•e u above, except 33,010,000 adjueted for 45 .ph desip~ speed (after credit for flood control excevetioo) 25 Stage Cowtructiw Io the event funding becomes a prabla, or to enhance the pwitiw w the emuel priority liar, the grsde eeperetiw project can be undertekeB ie atngm, briefly described ea follows: Underseas 3tege I. MiniBU• Initial Cowtroctioa. For the u~erpms elternetrve, it would not be practical to build lens then the ultisete bridge etruMUrm required !a entry the trsrda ecrom Milliken Aveaw. Rowever, excevetim for the approechm and ioitisl paving cwld be installed for one of the ulii~ete two parallel roedweya only. The length of the project would be striped for two linen, trmsitiwiag into the fully divided 6-lme seMiom et either sod. The mtineted cost of Siege I cwld thus be reduced to npproxiamtely 53.3 Billion. The Southern Pacific Route 138 Underpass in Cajon Pess is m essple of a etructurc built for ultimate 4-line divided use, but with initial 2-lane psvesmt sad grading. SiBilar rei lroed underpeasm were built using stage coostrvctiw et 25th Street Sast sod Avenue T Weer PalBdale. o Siege II - At a later date, when justified by traffic growth, additional exuvstiw to create tha full 6-lsae divided sectiw world be tmdertekm, and the associated paving of the parallel Stage II roedwny could be placed. Wetness Alternetivm. Ths Biairra cost for m initial useable overpms alternative could ceosist of the following: o Stage I - Pull width eabmhmt eectime world be placed w the epprwches, but wly s 2-leas structure spemiag the Smts Fe, with 2-line paved epproacbes, would be built initially. The initial two lines world cessist of one of the two parallel ~0-foot wide roadways, but striped for two-way operstim m previously dmcribed for the underpena. Sxsplm of ioitisl 2-line atructurm utilizing siege constructive include the Ruse Xey (forger Raselewn Avenue) Wercroesiag of the Uaiw Pacific Railroad in Poaxme, the Mill Street Overhead spending the Smte -e S Yard is Sm Bernardino, end the initial 2-leas sectiow of the Rvete 30 Freeway east of Sm Bernardino. The mtiseted cwt of Siege I could thus 6e reduced !o about 12.3 ~illiw. Stage II -- Mhm required by inmessw in traffic evd when fuoda become evai lebla, the 1.erailel roadway paveBmt world be ewstructed and the initial bridge would be widesad to the full 6-leae sectiw. 26 Fundiat for Subseoumt St After a reilroed Rode seperetim hee peen in place for 10 yeere, end if widening becwen eecessery, a widening project cm be owieeted to the Pu61ic Utilities Ca~iesim for cansideretioo on the eaouel priority liata. If the project reeks aufficimtly high, the coat is distributed io the following smear: Slate Highway, Sect. 190 Foods - 80% (PUC Progre•) Rail toed Cmtribution - 10X Local Fonda - 10% 27 1@19[108 OP P171Al1CINU This section prmmte a diacussiop of the factors relating to fiaepciag, StetrAid, eligibility for essintmce from various sources, and overall finmciel progreWS, for the iaforoetlon of elected City officials, akeff Webers, property owners, and the general public. Sable of the sources from which funds em be obtained for the constructim of roilroed grade aeperntiam and related iiproveaents ere the following: f15 Million Mnual California State Orode Seoerotion Fund Under Sections 190 sod 2450 et seo• of the Streets and Hiahwavs Code, sable f15 Billion per year is Wade available from the State flighwey Account of the State Trmaportetion FWnd to eseiat local egeocim for those roilrond grade croaeinga wnt urgently in need of aeparetiom. The oorWel ratio is 50 percent State - 50 percent local - 0 percent eeilroed perticipatiom for a project which does yot eliWinete m exiatiaj grade crossing, which is the case et Milliken Avenue. Under Section 190, it is nernsery for the project to be naWinetnd e~ maigned a pomitioW on the amuel priority list mtabliahed by the Celifomie Public Utilities Co~iasiom. The P.U.C. progreW in highly caWpetitive, with from 60 to 75 nominetioes aubWitted eecb year by citim, couotim and CelTrem Districts throughout the atats. The Wajor proble with rmpect to the proposed Millikm Avmue seperetim is the difficulty of ecbieviag a aufficimtly high position om one of throe mnuel lints to mauve m ellomtiop from CelTrenw. 'n.- ~~,it:.C funds r^~~!^ ^_°`--' Loin„ we ixrot 10 or 12 prajecte et the top of the list, and of these, mly three to five em be financed msh year, The P.U.C. for>tule to deteroiee etetewide priority reeking ie essmlielly a computer melysis, which evelmtm such Yactoro m cost of construction, vehicular traffic voluses, pomber of treio novesmts, Wax iWia vehicular and train speeds, relakive severity of cronaing geoWetrica, total rail Dlockege delay per day, dintepce to the next available crmaiog, accident history, and irceduci6lm. Other factoro being equal, the Co~issioe given higher rmkings to those projects which involve the lowmt cent. In response to P.U.C. Order Instituting Invmtigetiom No. 86-10-041, n pominetion, with a cop! of f4.1 Willim corrmpondieg to the upderpma elteroetive, wen suDWitted by the emnultipg engineer oe behalf of the City io Noveber 1986. This aa~ination, one of alWOnt 60 received, wen evel acted Dy the Cos~ise ios'• mgirecritlg •[aff. Pvhlic beai'tags ~ thxs priari'.y list, which dtahlishes eligibility for receipt of Stake Watehipg funds (up to 50 percent in the case of Millikm Avmue) were bald in April. A atetewide rmking of No. 25 wen mtabliahed le P.U.C. Deciaioa 86-06-016, June 15, 1987. The total cost of eligible projects m the list epproziWetes f200 Willion -- far in exceea of the liWited f15 Wi. :ion evailab le amuelly. 28 Obtriaiag a ponitim m the priority lint aisply estebliahm eligibility of n local agency to receive m elloebtipa et sale later date. It door not cc~it the City to my perti~vler 6cosetric cosfigurakive, nor does it create m abligetim m the part of the City to proceed. Overpms va Underpass at Mill ikor Avenue m Related to Pusdips. Dmed on the priority positive assigned to the Millikm Avenue project is the P.U.C. Decisive, the following rnnclueiom are evident: Underpass Alteraetive. With a priority etete+vide positive of No. 25, there is prectivelly no pves ibility that States latching foods would be available during the 1987-88 F.Y. Overpass Altermtive. Although m overpma elteroative wen rot subsitted to the P.U.C. far comideretion on the 1987-88 lief, cosputativea utilizing the lower coat mnocieted with this eltemetive indicated that it would hove received a priority position of No. 19; aignificmtly higher then the uoderpma, but not high enough to senora m elloeatim duria6 the current fisebl year. However, within mother four or five yearn, and after completive of construction, there i• nose possibility that m overpma project could receive a retroect iva ellocetion, m deccribed below. California Orede Seperetim Prosres Nitb Retroactive Funding. Recent msevdlset~ts to khe California Oracle Separative Act sllow s public agency to proceed with eeWmce ebostructim of a grade separative Drior to receiving a "reeu9roble" pasitim m e specific yeer'e list. The 50 percent latching fords fros CalTrms becese sys3leble in lose subseepeeot year, subject to eertein condi time regarding the relative priority position :., the later velar. 'n,t -d:•is :k.:l::r ui proceedang under throe new provisives depends on whether the local egascy can smege the cash flow probleas, and the uocerteiatity as to wbea the retroactive ellocetion would be received. The caspsretive outlook for abtaiaiag State aate~iag aid ie largely dependent on the rcletive costs of the several eltenaetive uoderpms and overpma Alma described earlier is this report, and is presorted in aussery fors m the attached Table 6. It is iamrtmt to note Chet the 00 on Railroad Cvetributive Since the proposed extensive of Mi113km Avenue involver a new crossing, no contril.ntion swuld be rewYived fros the Smte Fe Re3lwey under Section iZO[.5(e) of the Public Rtilities Code. 29 r a r m o \ M N V1 O\ N an ~ M a" O a z O H F~ U 77 .. ~WK w y a WHH W U1 W ~QQ ~C Hz C [7 W . W E q Q ( ~ 2 a K H w a .¢ h l/! zow ww^ D4FK a ~ ~ ~ ~ I W Q d N • .i G A H H O 1!~ n e m ~p q q NY H Ilf H rvf v m A O U W V • 0 0 0 0 a In ri r1 H N HF aU N N m vs u' v' U ~ rl > O N N rl .i H H q •ti •ti C H A A A m q •ti QI fJ A O W A ro q ro e Ya ~. V 4Uro ' N k~.1 A A A V '. qD qU ON O O O .-1q 7 M O i Z `° l a . i 1 O w w c ~ W £ W r H H O W W Q w W U O.ti C ~+N O A 0 .+ ro ~w N o e a r~ e m N A 4 ~.i a r~ n m rl N ~y O W N V N O ~' ~ W G O W N q u % N W q G • E O .-. In r e ~n ,., ~ N N .1 H rl N .~ rf m e+l O % N w 0 0 a rl rn n M N N 11 U ~ NN fR N N N yy yl £ V w ~ a AI •N u m A Z .'C S T S v N K N W N 1! v a ~/1 i(1 O N O N ~+ p t~ ~ In a ~n o p W 11 M N O b W G W •-1 b C q O N d N N N N W F CX N .. CX O ~ y >. C W a + ~ H q N ro ro C roc .- 1 C O o a a a q v a ro~ e u C ~ + ~ A e ,q e v ~ H ~ W~ Wy H o0 I I I N i I I i •v , I ro , ,: o ~ " mrn a v '3 c " + ~ •o I v e ro ro 3 rn w ro ro ro A q ro ro N q q N ro N c o.~ vs v vavv vavv„ „E N Hul s d A A I A C L I A C y N O N O" H E N H b q N ~n .. ~ C > > Na N U W ~ vf >C >R Q O ON O O O u~., 00 U~o u v n ti z N `^ a In to i a Local Bishwev Funds Funds available to the City to Yinmce itn share of the coot of the railroad grade seperntion and related inprovenente include various disburaeaeote frc~ State Higla+aY Users Tex FLnda, Federal Revmue Shoring Fords, and other sources. Federal-Aid Urbm Punch The only known patmtiel source of Federal fords Mould be order the Federal-Aid Urban Progre~, which is continued order the Surface Trmsportation Msistmce Act of 1987. However, theca is a grmt dml of casipet ition in Sm Bernardino Comty for the very Baited Federal 6ighwey fords, and this source does not appear preaiaing. Assessment District F1nanCing Where a public iaproveamt directly bmefits certain idmtifieble parcels of property, m Aaema~mt Distreict cm be established- Property owoero who realize the seat aignificmt bmefits would beer the major portion of the coat, although ownero of adjoining prapertiee benefiting indirectly cm also share. Aaseasaxmt Districts in California have finmced emitery aewero, slots drnim, etc., es well m railroad grade seperetiom, notable exsaplm being the Powell Street Overhead in Haeryville, two uoderpenaes in Livenore, and a new mderpese in Plemmtm. Fmdin[ Fro. Loral Sources. Withmt State Orede Seoerstim Funds TFw ..._.....raiC• -~ _ __ ~~ ~iai{.py at sue eeperoClm fords hea becoae quite intense. ~Itwisuaoetcqudtime6le when the City would obtain a "rmcheble" position m the Stntewide P.U.C. grade separation priority list even For a rotrosetive allocation. Therefore, it eppeero the City should plm on cronotructin6 the separation utilizing City fords, supplemented by the meeaeamt District funds, but without depending on the California State Orede Separation Progrs. 31 @1V1}t0[iM1~1TAI. ASS13S31~i'P INTRODVCTION This environmentd d.udy section is prepared In conjunction with the Nilliken Avenue Preliminary gngineering Report dated 1887 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The render is referred to thst report for a detailed Project Description and other rolevent aecteons. Only those environmental concerns not addressed in the Preliminary Engineering Report will be presented in this section. ALTRRNATIVB TO THB PROPOS® PRO]BCT Two elternetivee to the proposed grade eepnrotion exist. The brat is no project. The no-build alternstive would mean the contenustion of ell existing problems. As incresasd industrial development in the ores o/ the project develops, congaation end access problems will only women. The second slternetive is to construct an at-grade croadng. Thu alternative, with the projected traffic for YiUiicea Avenue sad its conflicts with the mnin reel Rnea and awtlchlag atwementa oa the spur fsncka, would graetly increase potentlnl accidents et the crossing. Moreover, a grode crowing enn be only if euthoriud by the l`elifornie Public Utilities Commission, which hw nbwlute jurisdiction. pinrtw tx.fh she engtneenng staff of the P.U.C. and 3enta Fe Railway could be expected to strongly oppow a grads erwsiag, it is mnaiderod unlekel7 that the Commission would bend down s Decision approving a grade crowing. PROPOSBD PROJBCT The proposed grade wpereteon on Milliken Avenue at the Atchison, Topeka end Sente Pe Reelwsy could take one of two forms. The first is en underpass; the eacond is en averpeas. Por purpows of the preliminary environmental study both wero considered. 32 ~ Determination an the basis of this preliminary environmental study, it is determined that [he proposed action will not have a significant effect upon the environment for the following reasons: 1. The project would not have a significant effect on existing air or water quality, noise levels, energy consumption, land use or be growth inducing. 2. The project mould not affect any rare oc endangered plants or animals, or significantly affect any other plant or wildlife species. 3. The project would be located in a gcedaoinantly industrial area. Nearby residential areas mould not be adversely affected. 4. The project would not involve the demolition or relocation of any structures. 5. No social, cultural, recreational, educational oc other public faciii[ies would be affected. 6. The aesthetics of the area would remain essentially unchanged. 7. No parklands, wetlands, floodplains, prime agricultural lands, historically or culturally aignlficant properties or s"es would to affected. 33 r 7-03-17 1981-I ENVIA ONMENTAL S[GNIF [CANOE CHECKLIST After making the necessary preliminary studies, answer [he following questions: if yes, 1s it signfff- Yes or cant? No, No Yes. or PHYSICAL. Will the proposal either directly or indirectly: 1. Change the topography or ground surface relief features? xE5 No 2. Destroy, cover, or modify any unique gealog is or physical features? NO _ 3. Result in unstable earth surfaces or exposure of people ar property to geologic hazards? No _ 4. Result in or be affected 6y sotl erosion or siltation (whether 6y water or wi ndJ? NO 5. Result fn the fncreased use of fuel or energy in large _ amounts or in a wasteful manner? NO 6. Result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural r _~..,. r.,c. NO _ 7. Result to the substant tal depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? ... ~ 8. Violate any published Federal, State, or local standards pertaining to solid waste or litter control? No _ 9. Modify the channel of a river ar stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? No _ 30. Encroach upon a floodpla in ar result in or be affected by floodwaters or tidal waves? ~4. 11. Adversely affect the quantity or quality of surface water, Or^-u.^.d water, ar public water supply? 1~ 12. Result in Che use of water in large amounts or in a wasteful manner? NO 13. Affect wetlands or rlparlan vegetation? •See following section: Otscusslon of Environmental Evaluation and Nfti9a[ton Measures. ae • 3-03-ta 1981-1 [f yes, is it signifi- Yes or cant? No, No Yes, ar PHYSICAL. Nill the ro osal either directl or indirectl co nt. i4. Violate or be inconsistent with Federal, State, or local water quality Standards? No 15. Result in changes in air aavement, moisture, or tem- perature, or any climatic conditions? NO _ 16. Result in an increase in air pollutant emissions, adverse effects on or deterioration of amoient air quality? NO _ 17. Result in the creation of objectionable odors? No _ 18. Violate or be inconsistent with Federal, State, or local air standards or control plans? No _ 19. Result in an increase in noise levels ar vibration for adjoining areas? Yes NO 20. Violate or he inconsistent with Federal design noise levels or State or local raise standards? pl0 5 21. Produce new light, glare, or shadows? YE6 No 8[OL OG iCAL. Yill the orooosal result in (aif hor dirnrrly or :,,n: r.~r r.,1~ 22. Change in Che diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora, and aquatic plants)? NO _ 23. Reduction of the numbers of or encroachment upon the critical habitat of any unique, rare ar endangered Species or plants? ~4 24. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or result in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Na _ 25. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop or commercial timber stand? ~ 26. Removal or deterioration of ezisti ng fish or wi ldllfe habitat? NO •See following section: Discussion of Environmental Evalwtwn and Mit19ai1an Measures. 35 7-03-18 1981-1 If yes, is it signifi- Yes or cant? No, No Yes, or ~ BIOLOGICAL. Mill the proposal result in (either directly or indirectly): (cant.} 2?. Change in the Diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, lard animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or micro fauna)? NO 28. Reduction of [he numbers of or encroachment upon the critical habitat of any um que, rare or endangered species of animals? NO 29. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, ar result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? No SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC. Nill the proposal directly or indirectl y: ( 30. Cause disruption of orderly planned development? NO _ 31. Be inconsistent with any elements of adopted community plans, policies, or goals, the Governor's Urban Strategy or the President's Nattonal Urban Policy (if NEPA nrnie~rly NO 32. Affect the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? NO _ 33. Affect life-styles, or neighborhood character or Stability? NO _ 34. Affect minority or other specific interest groups? NO _ 35. Divide or disrupt an establ lshed community? No 36. Affect existing housing, require [he displacement of people or create a demand far additional housing? NO _ 37. Affect employment, industry ar cormerce, ar require the displacement of bU51ne55e5 or fdrml5? NO _ 38. Affect property values or the local tax base? yE5 NO 'See following secttan: Olstusstan of Environmental Evaluation and Mitl ga t ion Measures. >. ~~ 7-03-1fi 1981-1 ' [f yes, is it signifi- Yes or cant? No, No Yes, or SOCIAL ANO ECONONIL. Nill Che ro asal directl or ind ireUl Cont. r 39. Affect any community facilities (including medical ' , educational, scientific, rec reatianal, or rei igious lnstitutians, ceremonial sites or Sacred shrines)? NO 40. Affect public utilities, or police, fire, emergency or other public services? xE5 NO 41. Nave substantial impact on existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/ar goods? xES No ` 42. Affect vehicular movements or generate additional traffic? ~ YES N0 43. Affect er be affected by existing parking facilities or result in demand for new parking? NO . 44. Involve a substantial risk of an explosion ar the release of hazardous substances in the e t f ven o an accident or upset coMitions? NO 45. Result in alterations to waterborne, rail or air _ traffirr NO 46. Affect public health, expose people to potential health hazards ar creat l _ , e a rea or potential health hazard? No 47. Affect any significant archaeological or historic site ~ A , structure, object ar building? NO 48. Affect naturai landmarks or man-made resources? NO _ 44. Affect any scenic resources or result in the obstruction _ of any scenic vista or view open to the public or , creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public v1ew7 ~Q. 40. Result in substantial imoacis assoNaced w+'th censtruo- traffic detours and gtempara ry accessc~etc r)?y drainage, NO •See following section: O15cuss ton of Environmental Evaluation and Mttl ga[1on Measures, 37 _~ ~ ~.. 3-03-17 1981-1 If yes, is it signffi- Yes or cant? No, No Yes, or MANDATDRY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. S1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the Quality of the envi rorment, substantial ly reduce the .habitat of a fish ar wildlife species, cause a fish ar wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number ar restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eifminate important ex ampies of the major periods of Califcrn is history ar prehistory? No 52. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- . teem, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the envi romient is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitfve period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) No 53. Does the project Nave environmental effects which are i~ividually limited, but cumulatively considerable? Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past Or01eCL5. [hP efferte of n~F.r _ ^! ^+^_ - the effects of probable future projects.--IC includes the effects of other projects which interact with this project and, together, are considerable. No 54. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No _ "See fallowing section: Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitl gat ion Measures. 38 ENVIRONtgNTAL EVALUATION AND MTIGATION MEASURES 40.) The construction of a grade separa[Son will provide improved emergency access throughout the area Sn the Hill iken Avenue vicinity. 41.) The impacts will be positive. Improved access Co areas [o the north Sn addition to the industrial areas will be provided from the San Bernardino 'e reeway. C PLATES ,. 0 y :J U -, .~ ,~ J U •. ~. ~: ~ ~ 3~>~~, ~ :1~d 'l~~'r.2y~l' ;I,> ~~I - ~ e'~ r ~~~ A ~ ;~1 z c ` ~/ ~.~ r ,ti ,\ ~.; ~ ~ -~ ~- <: ,i °s:.; i ', , V' ;~ ' ; _~ ~'t ag ~I ~i :~' 4 i M'I i . T:~ _ ~ ~.. r- c ~' ~: _~_ 'fit 4 -~ 111---~~. ~1 _ ~~~ --_ j _ .. _ _ .1J~~• =- - =, ~= F ~~~ ' ~ =_~~-- yiY ~ ~ S F ~ ~ 2 d ~ ~• ~~x ~~ n ~I. +9 9 <r r.- a ^~ ^ . i e -. sf ~;~ ~1 f t ~'~ ~~raa .._: , _ _,~_. ~ u Ef t ~• • , 0 F u ~ w* ~ ~ 7 v s 1 i ~ ~~ .-~~ ' / y L- ~ ~ ~, ~ I'F ~ h"f~` ~ i' a i y ' I .i •, 1 \\ ~~ • ~a ~ ~~~ ~ j ~' / ~ } i - ~ , _~~ -_ ~~ _-.y- ~ -1 ~~ ' -w._y. .~T. ~~ ''1 11 In ~ l I _,_ , -' f --r--r _.,.. _ ~- J V = ~~ .~. %(9 ~~ lF~ J i~t '°a . ~~y I ___ I ~ ~ ~. ~..y~.'. ~.. _. .-.' f ....~~ -._ _...... - . +~ni~ ~`* ;~ ~~ . ,~ `~ ~ j.' .e ~l .°`a k+~ I ~' f SIP [~~~j ~~_ i .+'` ..ail ~~ .__ ~ ~1 N ~. j ~1 ~. ~iKAW "1"" yi~rr eye ~~ 1.~. ` q:N 1ti.T.^~ 1 `~ ~W J l ~ S ~ ~ 1 i { ~ ~~~ ~y .v +~ .. . ~1 d ~~ , ~ ':~.: ~a3a~. ;. E f ~ 1'¢LL <`~'~ i ~~ .< ~ ~° F ~. _~,- "h""~3 1 / +a' ,~ ~~: ~~ 3 ~_~' d ~~. ._ _,_ . ~ , ryJ F IN t~ $ J b f ~ t+ r. J. A i~ 3 i fl ~ :"^ ~ ~ F ~~A(v consulting civil engineers January 29, 1987 61ane Frandsen Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Division Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 17821 E. 17th. Street Suite 295 Tustin, California 92680 (7I4) 832-4707 Reference: Project 87-002 Deer Creek Channel, Drainage Area VII Dear Blanc: We have revised the alignment study, because the City has or will ou rchase a portion of Tract !5955. It is cur u.^.derstard ing that this purchase is for a future park. GPS has made the following assumptions to prepare the revision: 1. A storm drain would have to be placed to the west property line of the park site. The City would be responsible for construction; therefore, this cost would be added to Alignment B. 2. It would be advantageous to reduce the amount of fill on the pack site. This is accomplished by reducing the water surface elevations, which requires increasing the size of the drain from the channel to Tuner Avenue. 3. The amount of storm drain easement required for Alignment A has been reduced by 25,525 square feet. 4. Wn have a<ci,}mcrj rho r:f ~= wE9~ •• i• .a - -Y r opc. ..y .re ,.~ she '[addle of Tract 15955. Our revised analysis produces the following construction costs, including all laterals: Alignment 'A' $1,630,700.00 Alignment 'B' 51,767,200.00 Bland Frandsen Project 87-002 ~ ,January 29, 1987 Page 2 Construction cost of 'A' is $136,500.00 less than 'B'. 'C' would still be higher than 'B'; therefore, 'C' was not revised. Exhibits A-1, A-2, B-1 and B-2 have been red lined with the revisions. Exhibits A-3 and B-3 have been revised. We are enclosing one copy of these exhibits for you[ review. Our original recommendation of Alignment 'B' has to be changed to Alignment 'A'. i would appreciate an early response. It will be necessary to get additional survey and soil quotes. I would like to start the survey on February 5 if possible. This would enable us to meet the present schedule. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, pie man NRS:lkb Enclosures t `3 -J ?~}~ ` ~. ~ ..j' .~ •-- ,.~ ~ ;9:. yR.v ~ l ~rC '. ,~. ~'• 3 ~ ~, ~ u ~., ~ •. ~, t.. ~ ~ t.s ~, ~, i'~ ~'.ii .r1~3S, t" x 1 ".i` i. ~ ~1 ;~ 1 t F' ~~ \~ y ~ r ° ~,~ ~~My~ ~ 1C 4 i+/ ~ ~'C- .£~ ,. ~\*~, ~' ~~ is 9"'~ b, ~= -~ ' y7 -~ _ ' ~ t ~i e ~ ~: Y ~Y ~ ~ ` ~ ~ E M x ,q. .:.~~ ~ _6 y ti f n ~n ~ z ~ y i RQ-~ , r ~ ', p ~. ~ ~. ; ~ ~ 5 ,~ } " a A- '~ljjjF $kj ~;, "` a ~ tx y t axe 3s ~"a~ . .. L.. _ _ _.,,r_ __. -- ~. - '~;. NI ySW~ p~ pp F Il 8 U U ~~o a o~a ~ {{C ~~ Y u p W `~Q' S ~ Z o _0 f F ~ a „ J J v U sl J ~ Q _ ~ W S ¢. Ci Q V W O ~ = F t r O - q ~1 4v ~ ~ L C r J I u s W ~ o o ~ o b o = = G = T T `. ': , ` ~ o O Vl n'! ~ ~ ~ ~ uiN ~ 1 ° ~ o 0 1 P ~ c nr o n M ~ Qp •O ~ u ~° ~ ~ 0 {./ ~ ° ~ o S ~ t e r~ C b ~ v T b o C ° O o b O ; 4! y- j V e ~ o ~° c c s b _ ~ "I° N ~'ry m ~ T Y ~- Y b ~ 1o N ~ ~ 7 T b O b ~ p ~ y` 7 : n _- b T ~ 0o r 6o h n o V Q' ~ 0 n 0 ~ .n {j y ~ _ ~ P ~ ~ U' r ~ ~. .~ `~' n I ' s P. S l r ~ ~ r v ~- ..,, ~. ~ n a T ~- o W ° 0 0 0 0 o e O h "~ T K _ = V K V Y ~~ ~° "' _ ~. r n n W trr- ~ e. eo J S ~ O o O b 0 Oo Q t. Q ~ q n = c O o ~ h ~ ~ O O it ' l ~ { r + ~ o * + * ~ V o + ~ 6 1 O f L I M1 ~ M ~ ,~ h h ry ~ ~ ` p ~~ b i b O a ~ y ~ b D consulting civil en gineer5 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F•P• date 12/23!86 chk'd. by N•~•S• date 1223/86' Project Rancho Cucamonga S. C. Limits Al igrment 'A' REv no, item quantity unit price cost 1 Channel Entrance L.S . L.S. 20 000. 00 2 Connec :or Pipes 77; L.F. 90. 00 2=,30C. OC 3 0" P.C.P. 655 L.F. 155, 60 lOB 075. 00 n 75" R. C. 7. 3-C L.F. 2?;7 .00 205 °0^ 5 Reinforce^_ ~oncre*.e Box 600 C.Y. '1x0 .00 270 ,000 , DO 6 Misc. Stru c`.u res 7 Eq, 3 Onp, 00 21 OOO. GC 7 Catch basins 9 EA. 3,000. 00 27,000. 00 A Strucw ra' Excavation 5,000 C.Y. g. pp aC ,000. 00 9 Structural 3ackfi 11 1,000 C, Y. 32. 00 32,000. 0 C 1C E•n banknent Bac kfill 4,000 C, Y. 6. 00 _ 32,000. _ 00 I1 :ravel Blanket 350 L. Y, an nn 1n.59n Of 12 Sho r+ng L.S. L.S. 30 ,000. OC 13 Pa ve~-en: Re la~:enent __ 4 000 S F 7 50 6 OOC GO 1a 96" P, C. P. 690 L.F. 324. 00 223,560. 00 ` R/'d Re oui red School 6,500 S. F. 9ovl~-2fi9- C3 ~ --0aree-}~-2--- -2-X325-S-F- ~;9 -„r. --Rase :-le .._2_},2Bq-S.FT Boo• 2Ci-CE Parcel 12 1C0 S. F. Boos 2':9-OP, Parcel 17 100 S.f, Bmk 203-02 Parcel 16 100 S. F. Comments total Alignre nt A sub total 41,951_ _ 2:5.00 _____._-_ Includ; ng Laterals A-1 to A-3 15: ~lxyo Conti agencies tsk, 666.0;; = s2,o9c,oo^.oo - "' ' - dotal est cost 51,20., 90:.~~ 7VVr'e t >r0 SL ~c is use rom Burner o . f 96"R.C. hanne~ -"-- sht, ~ of 4._ _.' IB IT eo D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F'P' date 12/23/86 chk'd, by N.K.S. date 12/23/86 Project Lateral A-1 Limits Turner Ave: Hum6olt Ave. to 1,350' n/o Feron Blvd. no. item quantity unit price cost 1 Connector Pi es 390 L.F. 90.00 35,100.00 2 33" R.C.P. 1,150 L.F. 110.00 126,500.00 3 36" R.C.P. 4G0 L.F. 115.00 46,000.00 4 39" R.C.P. 380 L.F. 125.00 47,500.00 5 ki sc. Structures 6 EA. 2,500.00 15,000.00 6 Catch Oasins 13 EA. 2 500.00 32 500.00 7 Shc rin L,S. L.S. 20 000.00 8 Pavement Replacement 15,000 S, F. 1.50 22,500,00 Comments sub total 15% 1~% contingencies total est. cost 5345 , l 00.00 f 51,900.00 5397,000.00 tht. ? of 4 D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F•P' date 12/23/86 chk'd.by N.K.S, date 12%23/86 Project Lateral 'p-2' RFv Limits Ferron Blvd.: 550' W/0 Turner Ave. to 1050' W/0 Turner no, item quantity unit price cost 1 Ccnnec for Pipes 40 L.F. 90.00 3,600.00 2 at~__q,_g rP. • SQO_L _E. 130.00 liS,000 _00 3 Idisc. Structures 2 EA, 2500.00 5,000.00 4 Catch Basins 2 EA. 25D0.00 5,000.00 5 Sha rin L.S. L.S. 2,000.00 6 Pavement P,e placement 4000 S,F. 1.50 6,000,00 • Has been eliminated - -- i Comments sub total S z1,6oo.oD 15:.j®.9/o contingencies E 3,200,00 total eSL. COSt E 24,800.00 sht. ? of 4 D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F•P• date 12/23/86 thk'd. by N. Y.. S. date 12/23/86 Project Lateral 'A-3' Limits Fe ton Blvd.: ID50' W/0 Turner ?0 1270' W/0 Turner no. item quantity unit price cost 1 Connector Ps aes 80 L.F. 90.00 7 200.00 2 33" R.C.P. 200 L, F. 110.00 22,000.0^v 3 Misc. Structures I EA. 2500.00 2,500.00 4 Catch 3asi ns 4 EA. 2500.00 1G,000.00 5 Shoring 1.5. L.S. 1,000.00 6 Pavement ee placement 2,000 S. F. 1.50 3,000.00 Comments sub total 15 t1~~o contingencies total est. cost 545,700,00 $ 7,300.00 553.000,00 sht. ? of 4 .. ~r ~ ~'r tro i ~ X~~i r~~ 18' C ~ ~" . ~ "'~T '~m. Y i J,,,,~~ ,t.~~,C,. ~ 'f ..iY"Ln... ~ ' a, 1 t ~ ~" ~T } / "t"" ~ c~ ~ 4 ~: '~ X41- iz ~ p' .Y {t``: N..C •.~''ii`•S ' (, Ft't J S l ij~"`~r y ~~ .1 i is "1w lt~eti. I +.v~C:~ ,f, ~'S~~rg''''..MMyy~~~f~f'' Y, t ~' YF ° ~ F` ~ t .* ~~ ~~ Y ~ ii44 ''~ ~ ~ Ai ki.~tyt'qFt~~,t+r4 $t'tf f{r y 7~G_ ftF~f ""tr ~ ~ ; Fv is ~:~'3:'$>t ! M ~`~ K .+~J+' ,SS ~' .i ` .~ .. ~ i ... s~{ i d e a ~ t !f. y i y r. p: ~ ~ li~ 6, r . ~ ~ ~ ~ f;,~',i , , - ~. r ..S r~ W.~,;SF~ . a'+~i e ' - ~ .,s r ' 'f.,~`. _.,..' D consulting cis it engineers 17821 E. 17th street suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F.P. date 12/23/E6 chk~d. by N.K.S. date 12/23/E6 Project Rancho Cucamonga 5.0. Limits Alignment 'B' RFV no. item quantity unit price cost C^.a noel Entrance L.S. LS. 20,GOU.UU 2 Cccnec :cr Fi pes 330 L.F. 30.OC 23,100.OC 3 -"-A,:..?--. 7d :.-.~. -140.,00- 2.«'7~%.:1C' _.," R. C. 7. 655 L.F. 165.CC 708 075.00 7°' R.C.?. 345 L.F. 235.00 81,075.00 c, a' o 6?5 L.F. 275.00 191 125.C0 7 90" ?.C.F._ 590 L.F. 3CC,00 177 000.00 8 1,~~~,; x 9'F R.C. Sox 600 C.V. 450.00 270 ,OOO.CO 9 Reinfo reed Concrete Sox 36 L.Y, 450.00 16,200.00 i(, Misc. 52 r„ttures 7 EA. 3,OOC.G0 21,000.00 1'. Catch 3asins 11 EA. 3,000.00 33 ,UOO.GO Sao rir, L.S. L.S. 90 ,OOO.CO 13 Pavenent Ee p',acec,e nt C,000 S. F. 1.50 30,000.00 14 Structural Exc. 5,000 C.Y. 8.00 40,000.00 15 St~,ctu ral Sac kfill 1,000 C.Y. 32.00 32,OGO.OC lfi Gravel Blanket 350 C.Y. 30,00 10,500.00 .. .5" R.C.F. *.o Crai r. Dark 690 L.F. 130.00 A9,700.00 i ~ Sc-_ _-.~__-- r _ (~om ments _tal _or Aliment 'B_ 5t1~ LOtai :r:'~'d+n; Laterals B-1 a B-z = lr ;g%contingencies -'°'E•~0_'~ 0? total est. cost E 1,239,375.00 E 1P5,9os.Gu S 1,a25,280.C0 sht. 1 _of 3 [81T °-' D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street suite z9s Tustin, Calif. 92680 714-83Z-4i07 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F•P• date 12/23/86 chk'd. by N.K.S. date 12/2"s!86 Project Lateral B-1 Limits Turner Ave.: Feron Blvd, to 1350' n/o Feron Blvd. no. item quantity unit price cost 1 Connector Pipes 360 L F. 90.00 32,400.00 2 33"' R.C.P. 1,150 L.F. 110.00 12F,SC0.00 3 36" R.C.P. 200 L F. 115.70 23,000.00 4 Misc. Structures 5 EA. 2 5D0.00 12 500 AO 5 Catch Basins 11 EA. 2,500.00 27,500.00 6 Shoring L 5. L.S. 12,500.00 7 Pavement P,e placement 11,000 S. F. 1.50 16,500.00 L Comments sub total Ez5o,9oo.Do 15a j1,~P~o contingencies E 38,100.00 total est. cost 52se,oou.oo sht. ? of 1 D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92660 714-832-4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F' P' dale 12/23; 86 chk'd, by N.K.S. date 12723/86 Project Lateral B-2 Limits Feron Blvd.: 1050' w/o Turner to 1270' w/o Turner no. item quantity unit price cost Connector Pipes 80 L.F. 90.00 7,20G AO 2 33" R.C.P. 200 L.F. 110.00 22 000.00 3 Misc. 5?ruc?urea 1 4 Ca?ch 9asi n5 4 EA. 2 500.00 10 000.00 5 Sheri ng L.S. L.S. 1 0 6 ~ave~ent Peplacement 2 000 S.F 1 5 - .. ~ ~ __ Comments_.._ _- sub total sas,7oo.oo - 15Y 11xR+6 contingencies s 7.300.00 __ _ _ LOLaI eSL. COSt 553,000.00 sht. 3 of 3 DRAINAGE AREA VII ALIGNMENT STUDY FOR STORM DRAIN CONNECTION TO DEER CREER CHANNEL PREPARED FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 9320 BASELINE ROAD ti+iiC iii ~iiCitiiGiJiie+, i.nLi FlJxn1H Y1/SU PREPARED BY NORMAN R. SPIELMAN GOVERNMENTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17 E21 E. 17TH STREET SUITE 295 TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 97fi BO JANUARY 8, 1987 R£COMM£NDATIONS AND ciM ARy OF ANAi vcrc ALIGNMENT 'B' This alignment (refer to Exhibit B-1) is the recommended alignment. Construction dollars are the least iS1,144,000.00) while accomplishing the objective. Right- of-way requirements are the least (6,500 square feet). ALIGNMENT 'C' There is no advantage to select the number two alig r..^.:e nt (refer to Exhibit C-1), due to the higher construction cost ($1,155,000.00) and increased right-of-way needs (15,000 square feet). ALIGNMENT 'A' Alignment 'A' is the least effective due to construction cost ($1,540,000.00) and right-of-way needs (32,325 squaxe feet). II BACRGROUND AUTHORIZATION OF THE STUDY We were authorized to prepare this study by Blane Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer, in a letter dated December 5, 1986. The notice to proceed date was December H, 1986. OBJECTIVE We were to determine if the Corp of Engineers would allow an entry into the Deer Creek Channel. Is the invert of the existing Deer Creek Channel.at an elevation that would aliow consrruction of a storm drain system, was the other primary concern. GPS is to investigate the possibility of constructing a storm drain system to provide deainage for "Drainage Acea VZI", during the 1987 construction season, The alignment should avoid any locations requiring a permit from the railroad. We were to review possible alternative systems and recommend an alignment. MET HODOLGY A preliminary survey will be conducted tc establish relative elevations at the following locations. 1. Channel invert, at 24th Street, Hu mbolt, 22nd Street and 20th Street. 2. Turner Avenue at Humbolt Avenu° (including existing channel invert, parallel to Turner Avenue). 3. 500 feet and 1,050 feet, plus or minus, on the pro- longation of Humbol[ Avenue west of Tucnec Avenue. 4. Feron Boulevard, 1,050 feet, plus or minus, west of Turner. 5. North property line of school, 1,050 feet west of Turner Avenue. 6. Turner Avenue at 20th Street, 22nd Street, 24th Street, Feron 0ouleva r.d and north property line of schJGi. These elevations would allow us to determine surface restrictions that affect the various alignments. Existing substructure facilities will be orated from available existing plane and atlases, Ezieting street plans will be provided by the City, if available, A water and sewer atlas was provided by the Cucamonga Water District. Cocp of Engineers provided the channel improvement plans. The gas, electrical and telephone companies provided information on the location of their facilities. The railroad right-of-way was plotted from the assessor's parcel maps. After collecting the above information we were able to study the various alignments. Consideration for the alignments would be: 1. Drainage of the area. 2. Right-of-way requireme nt.s. 3. Probable costs. IIS STEPS IN ANA YSI DEER CREER CHANNEL ENTRY Zana Olson, San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD), was contacted on December 9,1986. Olson stated that the Cor p's policy was to accept storm water and issue a permit for a channel entry, when the City had an adopted Master Flan of Drainage" showing discharge of stor rt. water into their facility. It is necessary for the City to request channel and provide a copy of the map and "District" will make the formal request Engineers. The Corp normally responds to approxi,-,„ately 30 days. entry into the hydrology. The to the Corp of the request in The above information was related to Cindy Hackett, City's Encineering Division, on December 9, 1986. City will submit rap, hydrolcgy and request to construct in the Deer Creek Channel. A review of the elevations along the various alignments resulted in the elimination of any alignments entering the channel south of Hu mbolt Avenue. These were eliminated because they would require permits from the railroad and would increase the construction cost. it appeared that ar.y alignment north of the railroad was feasible and worth investigation. mnc wco rvn urrcr nm mvc A shallow box will be required to go under the existing P.C.C. and rock channel. This construction will be cequ iced for all alignments. FAILR OAD RIGHT-OF-WAY All alignments avoid encroachment into the right-of-way. Therefore, permits will not be required, which avoids delays. DRAINAGE AREA VII - MODIFICATION he have increased the quantity of storm water contributed to r~.ic a va by q6 cfs, mhis is the resiiii of adding the area wes t~of Turner Avenue and south Felon Boulevard. The addition was included in all alignments. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer - The existing sanitary sewer in Turner Avenue will require an additional length of shallow box construction. This is required for ell alignments. Power poles - Additional suppozt will be necessary, during constzuction, for the powez poles in Bumbolt Avenue. There are no other major restrictions to the alignments studied. These findings are based on available records and information provided to us. The estimates of probable costs include protection of substructure facilities. SURFACE RESTRAINTS There is an existing sump in Feron Boule vazd approximately 650 feet west of Turner Avenue. This increases the size of the drain proposed in Feron Boulevard and prohibits consideration of Alignments 'D' and 'E' (Channel entry at 24th Street). The project stozm water surface would be above the existing street elevation. The undeveloped area west of Turner Avenue and south of Feron has a Bumped area. It would be necessary to provide fill and zaise the height of the greund to provide dzainage for any alignment. (Refe[ to Exhibit A-2, Station 28 + 10). RIGHT-OF-KAY REQDIREMENTS All alignments cequ ire storm drain easements and temporary construction easements. Alignment 'A' zequices five easements from the area west of Turner Avenue and south of Feron Boulevard and one easement through the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School site. There are six separate parcels involved. Alicnments 'B' and 'C' require easements only from the school district. PROBABLE COSTS The estimates of probable costs are based on actual bid pzices received for projects cons tzucted in the area and do not reflect any easement costs. Channel entry is based on a standard entry and does not reflect the cost of a special entry. IV ALIGNMENT 'A' The alignment is shown on Exhibit A-1, which includes the laterals necessary to drain the area. Exhibit A-2 presents a preliminary profile for the proposed main line drain. This alianme r.t has the advantage of approximately 1,400 feet of construction in undeveloped land. Pavement replacement is not requited and vehicular traffic in the construction area is eliminated. All storm drain pipe placed in the street (proposed laterals) are small sizes. Sizing of the system requires the least amount of fill to be placed in the undeveloped area west of Turner Ave r.u e, Requiring additional fill would allow the substitution of a 96" RCP for the 10' x 9' RCB in Hu mbolt Avenue. There is a possibility that construction costs would be increased if there is a high ground water elevation in the undeveloped area. Water surface elevations were established to enable all existing sumps to be drained, except as noted above. Although this alignment has less square footage of construction in streets, there is a requirement of a storm drain lateral in Turner Avenue. Therefore, the value of nn:nhiF:fnA •.oFF:n .-^t.-- .'~.C: L:~ '..nr .: ..C ...Gu ao im ocucu. Storm drain easements totaling 32,325 square feet will be required. Construction easements, in addition to the permanent easements, will be required. A dollar value has not been used for the easements. Any cost of right-of-way causes an increase in the total cost of this alignment. Estimate of probable costs for this alignment is $1,560,000.00. (Refer to Exhibit A-3). The lateral system would add $550,000.00. A reduction of $175,000.00 can be accomplished by reducing the size cf the main line, from Turner Avenue to the Deer Creek Channel. - I - - Y ~ _~'9= .cos i ... ~ . ~'. ~ ./"'.'+' 3 ,/`. t ,.~J:W-~~~ ~ ~.~!,..~ 'r, .tit. ter.; < .e X i. ~'r.`ti~+ < ;~ ~'': . ,~i' _ ~4 Y ~ / h -~ y.-...~ ' ~. " v~ ~ ~ a ~ ~I , P 1, ~' ~~ ~ ~' ; • s~.. ~. J 1 ); t : ' ~~~ ~ O ~ ~ 1 ~ I a .~..: i' . .. C ~ i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~' _ 5 ~~ i 1 ~ ~ r ~ ~ T ~ A ~ r ~ ~ ~i] vfn ~ ~ ~~~ '~'-r'S 1, R~'~ i f~~ i" tit-. •R~~ 4 ~' ~'! 1 1 ii ~j :µi ~ } yl~K~ j ~~•~ ~~' I 1 v~ t /~ Q~u _ ff '~ ~ ,;.~ {~ ~ ~ IU ~~ ~ ~~ ~ a~t s I -- = ~ .: .,.~ . EXHIBIT A-1 -.. _e. _ ._ D4T.0 X983 ~di~j r"~'y;,c~ -..~. D a,nwlting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F~F• date 12/23/&6 chk'd.by N.K.S. date 12/23/86 Project Rancho Cucamonga 5.0, Limits Alignment 'A' no. item quantity unit price cost 1 C~•~annel Entra ncz L.S . L.S . 20 o00, C0 2 ^re c~or =!pes 27C L.F. 30 .C0 24,30G .00 655 L r. 16o .G0 10° 07b, oG - 7c' F 6?5 L.F. 235 .00 134 ,475. GC ~ei~°; rc=. ;; nc re±e Box 1 645 C.Y. ~SG .00 740 Z50. 00 °. '" ;c ',res 7 E4, ~ COG . 0^ 21 OOO. CG - :a tch Basins 9 EA. 3,000 .00 27,000. 00 Structural Bxcavat ;on 13 000 C.V, 8 .00 104 000. 00 St r~cfaral Sack Fill 2,OOG C.Y, 32 .00 64,000 .00 1C E^ba n''+~ent Back °ill 4,000 L,Y. ° . OC 32,000 ,00 i~ ~ B~'^~°~ nw ~ aV ,w Cl UW,UU 12 ~.o ri ~; L S L.S . 30 ,OOG. CO i3 ?av rcen: P.enla cement 4 700 S.F 1 50 6 OOC 00 ` P'W Re. ;ui reC Sc hocl 6,5GG S. F . B:u~ 2G~-:^ Parcel 2 2, 325 S . F. ~ ~ - ._ --- 2- vr~. r - ' - r - n.: reel 12 1C0 S . F. - -- - _ s~__."i-:5 na rcel 77 lOC S . F. _ _ o'r ?,>-S5 =arcel _ 16 lOG S . F. 'al Ai moment ;, $1,330,100.00 ( nm menu _'=~ ~ Stlb total ._ _ ;~cl,^~nq La~erals ~~-1 to A-3 15< 201,900.00 _ ._.__. ___ _ iFXR/o contingencies - - 5`~'~"'~'~ C~ ~O[aI CSL. COSt $1,540,000.00 ~~ ',Y s~;::e ~ romr ,u~ ~o l~~a nn e~f 96"R.C. - -- sht. ~ of ° D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est.b F'P' date 12/23/86 y chk'd. by N.K.S, date 12/23/86 Project Lateral A-1 Limits Turner Ave: Hum bolt Ave. to 1,350' n/o Feron 81vd, no, item quantity unit price cost 1 Connector Pi es 390 L. F, 90.00 35,100.00 2 33" R.C.P. 1,150 L.F. 110.00 126,500.00 3 36" R.C.P. 400 L.F. 115.70 46,000.00 v 39" P,. C. P. 360 L. F, 125.00 47,500,00 Misc. Structures fi EA. 2,500.00 15,000.00 6 Catch gas ins 13 EA, 2 500.00 32 500.00 7 Sho rin ~ L.S, L.S. 2C 000.00 6 Pavement Replacement 15,000 S, F. 7,50 22,500.00 Comments sub total f345,100.00 15% loo/a contingencies f 51,900.00 total @St. COSt f397,000.00 sht.? of 4 D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est, by F'P' date 12/23/86 chk~d.by N.K.S, date 12/23/86 Project Lateral 'A-2' Limits Fe rron Blvd.: 650' W/0 Turner Ave. to 1050' W;0 Turner no, item quantity unit price cost 1 Ca nnec for Pipes 40 L.F. 90.00 3,600.00 2 42" P„C, 7. 500 L.F. 13C.CC 65,000.00 3 Misc. St ra ctures 2 FA, 25CO. u^0 S,000.OC a Catch Basins 2 EA. 2500.00 5,000.00 5 5hc rin L.S. L.S. 2,000.00 6 Pav exent Fe pl ac ement 4000 S. F. 1.50 6,000.00 i Co SUI'/ LOLa~ E 86,600.00 15%~~/o contingencies E 13,460.00 LOLeI eSt.COSt 5100,000.00 sht. ? of 4 D consuhing civil engineers Estimate of Quantities 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Probable and Costs e st. by F.P. date 12/23/56 chk'd.by N,K.S. date 12/23/86 Project Lateral 'A-3' Limits Feron Blvd.; 1050' W/0 Turner to 1270' W/0 Turner no, item quantity unit price cost 1 Connector Pi ue; 80 L. F, 90.00 7 200,OC 2 33" P.. C.°. 200 L.F. 110.00 22,000.00 3 Misc. Struc'ures 1 EA, 2500.OC 2,500.00 4 Catch 3asins 4 ER, 2500. CO 10,000.00 5 Shoring L.S. L.S. 1,000,00 6 ~avemert Re placer.e nt 2,000 S.F. 1.50 3,000.00 i i Comments sub total 15 t'~%Y~o COntlflgenCleS total est.cost sas,7oo.00 E 7,300.00 E 53,COO.C0 sht. 4 of 4 V Af.I f:NMENT 'B' The alignment is shown on Exhibit B-1, which includes the laterals necessary to drain the area. Exhibit B-2 presents a preliminary profile for the proposed main line drain. This alignment places the greatest amount of main line construction in the existing streets. There are mere substructure restrictions; however, it appears that these are only design considerations. Greater fill requirements will be necessary for the undeveloped land west of Turner Avenue. It is assumed that the undeveloped parcel may be drained, by Placing a lateral in Main Street; thereby, eliminating procurement of a storm drain easement on Parcels 12, 17 and 16. A storm drain easement .will be required on the school property (6,500 square feet). Estimate of probable posts for this alignment is $1,144,000.00. (Refer to Exhibit B-3). The lateral system would add $342,000.00. 1 ~; ' ~~ ,rte .~~ AL. it `. $ ~J ~ ~„ ..A ~rr q7 QAa U ~~ ire rr ~ t ; t.r ' ,~ ~ ~ 'F si"". e ~'~, . ?~ . t...~ ,s ,_ . ~. ,+'# ?G;;: J ~;: ,.; ~'1~"~ '" :' . ~~~~, ..~. ^~ ,.: `~ - .~~~ a' /~ y;..a b fn l'~ 'E~.. . ~' vt ~~ .{ . ~~s ' .' i=i`' ~: ___.. ~ . ,. '~ :. 1 i A 1 1 i D consulting civil engineers Estimate of Quantities 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714-832-4707 Probable and Costs est. by F•P~ date 12/23/86 chk'd.by N.K.S. date 12/23/86 Project Rancho Cucamonga 5.0. Limits Altgnment 'B' no. item quantity unit Brice cost 1 Channel Entrance LS. L.S. 20,000.00 2 Connecter Fi pes 330 L.F. 90.00 29,700.00 3 4;" R.C.P. 20 L.F. 140,00 2 200.00 60" R.C.P. 655 L.F. 165.00 103,075,00 7p" P.. C. P. 345 L F. 235.00 n1 ,075.00 6 34" P. =. P. 695 L F. 275.00 191 125.C0 7 90" R.C.P. 590 L.F. 300,00 177 000.00 3 96" R.C.P. 600 L.F. 324,00 194,400.00 3 Reinforced Concrete Box 36 C.Y. 450.00 16,200,00 10 Misc. Structures 7 EA. 3,000.00 21,000.00 11 Latch Basins 11 EA. 3,000,00 33,000.00 12 Snoring L.S. L.S. 90,000.00 13 na vement P.e laces en `. O,C00 S. F. 1.50 3C ,000.00 ~e, :. ua ~ -- - Schocl _~S C; S. F. Comments Total for includi n9 La .,e rals P-1 Alignment 'B' SUb total _S 994,375.00__ 6 B-2 15% ~g.P/o contingencies 5 163,625.00 total est. cost St ,t a4,ooc.oo aht. 1 of? IB IT a ~ D consulting civil engineers 17821 E.I7th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F.P. date 12723/86 chk'd.by N.r..S. date 12/23/86 Project Lateral B-1 Li mils Turner Ave,: Fe ron Blvd, to 1350' n/o Fe ron Blvd. no. item quantity unit price cost 1 Connector Pipes 360 L.F. 90.00 32,400.00 2 33" R.C.P. 1,150 L F, 11 C.OG 126,500.00 3 36" P, C. P. 200 L. F, 115,0^v 23,000,00 4 Misc. Structures 5 EA. 2 500.00 12 500.00 5 Catcn Basins 11 EA. 2,500.00 27,500.00 6 Sh0 ri ng L.S. L,S. 12,500.00 7 Pavement Replacement 11,000 S. F, 1.5C 16,500,00 ~-'-- Comment SUb tOLeI 5250,900.00 15A ~/o C'OntingellCleS S 38,100.OD total eSt. COSL 5283,000.00 sht. ? of 3 D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714-832-4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs 1270' w/o Turner no. item quantity unit price cost 1 Connector Pipes 80 L.F. 90.00 7,200.00 2 S3" R, [. P. 200 L.F. 110.00 22 COO,GG 3 Misc. S`. ructu res 1 5 Catch Basins 4 EA. 2 500.00 10 000.00 5 Sho rin) L.S. L.S. 0 6 Pavement Re placement 2 000 S E 1 5 _-_ ~- _ __ -- __ I Comments SUt1 LOtai 545,700.00 15a ~ '~ COntitlge11C125 E 7.;00 00 total eSt.COSL E53 ,000,00 est. by F. P• date 12/23/86 chk'd. by N.K.S, date 12/23/26 Project Lateral B-2 Fe ron Blvd.: 1050' w/o Turner to Limits sht. 3 Of 3 V I Ai.I .NM NT ' ' The alignment is shown on Exhibit C-1, which includes the laterals necessary to drain the area. Exhibit C-2 presents a preliminary profile for the proposed main line drain. This alignment places more main line construction in the existing streets than Alignment 'A' but less than Alignment ~g~ There are more substructure restrictions than Alignments 'A' or 'B'; however, these are design considerations. Fill and drainage requirements for the undeveloped parcel west of Turner Avenue will be the same as Alignment 'B'. A storm drain easement will be recu fired on the school property (15,000 square feet). Estimate of pcobable costs for this alignment is 91,155,000.00. (Refer to Exhibit 8-3). The lateral system would add $402,000.00. ' --' .; .i ~, t ' ~ i '~c.t' O a ~ ~ i ~, 7 _ .- " ~° ~~~ \ ~ ~•..,. .~ 1i ..:y~i -4 ~. ~ Y i + ~ ~ ' ... ~. ~ ~ . ` , .. ..:u: ~~ .,. ~. ~1 A ' I { ~ J ~~ .w h r ~ _. ~ ~ ,, y y5. ,' 1 P , i' ~t r `; i I i f ; ~ ~ •I I ~ ' i ` ~ D consulting civil engineers Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F'P' date 12/23/E6 chk'd.by N.K.S. date 12/23/86 Rancho Cucamo n9a 5.0. Project Limits Alignment 'C' no. item quantity unit price cost 1 Channel En tra r,ce LS. L.S. 20,000,00 2 Lonnec for Pi es 300 L.F 7 ? =c" P.L.?. 20 L.F. 140.00 2,800.00 4 15" P.C.P. 1,250 !,F. 245.00 306 250.00 5 84" P,. C, P, 1 D46 L.F. 275.00 287 375.00 6 ?6" n :, P. 600 L.F. 324 00 194 40C 00 7 lei nfo rceh Concrete Box ~ 36 C.Y. 450.00 16,200.00 8 Mi sc, Structures 7 ~ 1 Catch Basins 10 z n nn 10 Shorin. 11 Pdv ePe nl Pe pldc er,e nt 1fi.OM G c 1 Sn 9A nnn nn ' R!'rl P.e qci reG Se'~iu O1 OC^. ' --__.- - -_ -~I - tdl dl i. n,. ens '!" Gomments_? 3 ;ncludinq Laterals :-1 5 C-2 Sl.ss7.ooc„ _ 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 7l4 - 832- 4707 sub total t,ooa,azs.oo 15E ~~~/o contingencies 150,915.00 total est. cost _1,15S.ODO.Do aht. ~ of 9 D consulting civil engineers 17821 E. 17th Street Suite 295 Tustin, Calif. 92680 714 - 832- 4707 Estimate of Probable Quantities and Costs est. by F. P• date 12/23/86 chk'd. by N.K.S. date 12/23/86 Project Lateral C-2 Limits Feron Blvd.: Turner Ave. to 1270' w,/o Turner Ave. no, item quantity unit price cost i Connector F~, Pes 100 L.F. 90.00 9 OOO AO 2 33" R,C. P. 620 L.F. li0.OG 6° 20C.00 3 67" P,. C. P. 650 L.F. 155.00 100 750.00 Ni sc. 5*_ructures 4 EA. 2,500.00 10,000.00 5 Catch Basins 5 6 Shoring L5. L.S. 12,600.00 7 Pavement Re lacement ~ 7G 000 S.P. 1.50 15 000.00 Comments SUb tOtai E227, 950, 00 tsz lfk~/o contingencies E 3a,asa.oa IOTa~ eSt.COSC E262,000.00 she. 3 of 3 VII ALIGNMENTS 'D' AND 'E' Preliminary investigations show that the area west of Turner Avenue cannot be drained because the projected water surface elevations are above the existing street elevations at the sump on Feron Boulevard. The alignments have channel entries at 24th Street, The main line alignments are the same to the intersection of Turner Avenue and Feron Boulevard. Alignment 'D', from Turner Avenue and Feron Boulevard, is the same as Alignment 'B'. Alignment 'E', from Tucner Avenue and Feron Boule v=_rd, is the same as Alignment 'C'. No further consideration of these two alignments is necessary. VIII CONCLOSION Alignment 'B' is the least expensive of the alignments studied, for main lines and laterals. Alignment 'A' M,a in-"x1,540,000 Laterals-5550,000 Total-52,090,000 Alignment 'b' Main-51,144,000 Alignment 'C' Main-51,155,000 Laterals-$342,000 Laterals-$402,000 Total-$1,486,000 Total-$1,557,000 Ptorm drain easements required for Alignment '8' are less than for Alignments 'A' or 'C'. All alignments would require easements through the Rancho Cuca monea Middle School grassed area. It would appear that this easement would cause less ir,t erference with the school facilities. Storm Drain Easement (squa[e feet) Alignment 'A' School - 6,500 Other - 25,825 Total - 32,325 .,: ~~ School-6,500 Other - 0 Total - 6,500 A.l ignment 'C' School - 15,000 Other - 0 Total - 15,000 Realistically, an administrative cost should be applied for acquiring each easement, even when the property is dedicated in exchange for improvements. If Alignment 'A' was selected it would be necessary to modify the alignment to construct in Main Street or pay for easements on Parcels 12, 16, and 17. Each of the alignments considered have the capability of _-.. "Drainage Area Th2LE is less cost for lateral construction or, Alignment '8' because the main line eliminates the necessity of a separate lateral (A-2 or a section of C-2). There is no reasor. ko select Alignment 'A' unless the City desires to reduce the height of fill or immediately furnish drainage facilities for the undeveloped parcel. ,.. Eliminating the number of parcels requiring easement negotiations provides more assurance of constructing the drainage system during the 1987 construction season. ~~ or man R. Spi lman r ~,~~~ -VPic lc 25 APPRAISAL REPORT STOR'YI DRA ,N E~ASEMEN7' AREA VIS sANC~z - vu.3aRREAL - coNZALEs fir CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAt.ii•'O^,`;,.; y1730 DATF, OF VALUE MeY 1, 1987 by .3. WH.LIAb4 MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTBJG AP1'IiAISERS GGFi3 RIVERSRIE DRIVE CHINO, CALIFOIL'YIA 91710 J. Wzr.ni-air ?Icaexx eno es eao.res ce nsc~rlne evvvelsevs wp5i O/gym[ 9oM 9ef See3 wiVCw5'~C pw~VC C8IY0. CALIPORNIA BRIO > ~ 328.35> June 3, Y 987 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Boz #`807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attn: Blane Frandsen Re: Storm Drain Easement, Area VII -Sanchez, Villarreal, Gonzales Dear Mr. Frandsen: As requested, we hava completed as appraisal of the property referenced above and further identi5ed by Assessors Pazcel Numbers 209.085.18; 209-085-17; and 209-085- 12. The purpose of our report is to estimate the market value of the land and improvements proposed to be taken in easement for the subject properties, and also consider severance damages or special benefits. if any. As of btay 1, 1987, our estimate of market value Cor the properties to be taken in easement, severance damages, and special benefits are as follows Sanchez Part Taken (Easament) $ 500.00 Parcel 209-085-16 Severance Damages $ 0.00 Special Benefits $ 0.00 Villarreal Part Taken (Easement) $ 960.00 Parce1209-085.17 Severance Damages $ 0.00 Special Benefits $ 0.00 Gonzales Part Taken (Easement) $ 1,30(? 00 Parce1209-085-12 Severance Damages 3 0.00 Special Benefits $ 0.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California Attention: B1ane Frandsen Page 2 June 3,1987 The following report sets forth the purpose and scope of ow appraisal, assumptions and limiting conditions as well as the supportive data which formed the basis of ow value conclusions. Respectfully submitted, J. WII31AM MURPHYANDASSOCIATES CONSULTING APPRAISERS r ii' Michael S. Murphy f MSM/acc TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ................................................................................ .............1 Letter of Transmittal ................................................................................ 2 Table of Contents ......................................................................................4 Inkadudion Summery of Salient Data ....................................................................7 Purpose and Defnitions ................................................................... 10 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions ..................................................12 Certification ........................................................... ......................13 General Area Description Area Map .....................................................................................14 Area Data ....................................................................................15 City MeP ......................................................................................16 City Data .....................................................................................17 3anahez -Parcel Number 40&OP&16 Photo and Plat MaD ........................................ ............................19 Analysis Vesting ............................. ..................... ............................20 Location ................................................ .............................20 Assessors Parcel Number ............................ ............................20 Legal Doscription ...................................... .............................2C Area cf Outrerchip....... ~ ............................. ............................20 Street Access ............................................ ............................20 Topography ............................................. ..... ~...................... 20 ImProvements....... .................... .............................20 'Laning ................................................ . ............................ 20 Site Intluence .......................................... .............................20 Present Use ............................................. ............................ 21 Highest and Best Use .................................. V l i ............................ 21 a uat on Method of Valuation ...................................... .............................22 Larger Parcel ............................................. ............................. 23 Part Taken (F.asementl Photo and Parcel Mep of Part Taken !Easement) .......................... ........26 Description Land ......................................................................... ........27 ImProvements .............................................................. ........27 Vnlu anon Land ........................................................................... .... .. ..27 Improve men u. ............. ...... ......... ......................... "' ........1r `c~en nce Damages, Special Benefits, Total Just Compensation ....... ........ 28 0487-3'zI 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Villarreal - Parcel Number 208-085.17 Photo and Plat Map ........................................ ............................29 Analysis Vesting .................................................. ............................ 30 Locetion ................................................. ............................30 Assessors Parcel Number ............................ ............................30 Legal Deacriptian ...................................... ............................30 Area of Ow'nership ..................................... ............................30 StreetAccess......... _._...._...... .. _.... _.___ . . ..... ...... ...... ... 30 TopogrePhY ............................................. ............................30 Improvements .......................................... ............................30 Zani ng ................................................... ............................30 Site InBuence ........................................... ............................30 Present Use ............................................. ............................31 Highest and Best Use .................................. ............................ 31 Schematie ................................................... ............................32 VAI LAC1nO Method of Valuation ........................................................... ........ 33 Larger Parcel .................................................................. T k (E t] P ........ 34 art a en asemen Photo end Parcel Map of Part Taken (Easement) ......................... .........37 Description Lend ......................................................................... ........38 Improvements .............................................................. ........ 38 Valuation Land ......................................................................... ........38 Improvements ................................................ .............. ........38 Totel ......................................................................... ........39 Severance Dama¢es. Special Benefits. Total dust Comoen cation ....... .........39 Gonzales • Parcel Number 208985-12 De<cription Photo and Plat bfap ..................... Analysis Vesting ............................... Location ................................... Assessors Parcel Number ..........., Legal Description ........................ Area of L'umership .. ..... ...... ..... ..... Street Access ... .... ............... ... ..... ToPOgra ph Y ............................... ImProvem ants. _ ......................... Zoning . ..................... .... ......... S itr ]n (lu rnce Present llse ........... ..... . ..... ......... Highest and Best Use .................... Schematic .......................... .......... Method of Valuation ..................... Larger Parcel ............................ ............................................. 40 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 AI 42 42 43 ............................ ...............44 ......................................... .... 45 04-87-,f21 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Gonrales - Parcel Number'.mB96r12 (Continued) P Tak ( ~ nt) Photo end Pareel Map of Part Taken (Easement) ..................................48 Description Land .................................................................................49 ImProvementa ......................................................................49 Valuation Land .................................................................................49 improvements ................................... _......,, .,...... _...........59 Total ........................................................................ . ........ 50 Severance Damages, Special Benefits, Total Just Compensation ............... SO Addenda Market Date Location MeP .................................... ............................ A . B .. .......................................... Market Data ......... .. ........................ C SubJect Property Grant Deeds ................................. .............................D Partial List of Paraona Contacted ............................ ............................. .E Appraisers Qualifications .................................... ............................ fi 04-5. sal INTRODUCTION SUMMARY OF SALIENT DATA Vesting. Sanchez, Angel G. and Josephine O. Locatiom Southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Main Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Assessor Paroel Na 209-085-16 Legal Description: See Grant Deed in Addenda C Atra of Ownership: .19 more or less acres (8,482 square feet) StreetAceess: Access is by paved road to east with fully improved (sidewalk, curbs, gutters) street to north of property - Main Steer. Topogiaphy. Level; built up on northeast to approximately 2 to 3 feet above street level Improvements 2 to 3 foot high block retaining wall (1471ineaz feet) Zoning. L -Low Residential, 2 - 4 density units per acre Site Influence: The property backs to railroad tracks Present Use: Vacant land Highest &Best Use: To be improved with a single family residence Summary of Estimated Values: Value of property (land only) in before condition: S 10,600.00 Less value of the proposed taking in easement: S 500.00 Value of remainder as part oC the whole: S 10,100.00 Value of remainder in the after condition: S 10,100.00 Severance Damages: S 0.00 Special Benefits: S 0.00 Total Just Compensation Value of the Part Taken in Easement: S 500.00 Severance Damages: S 0.00 Special Benefits; $ 0 00 Tota1• $ 500.00 04.87321 7 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY OF SALIENT DATA Vesting: Villarreal, et al Location: 50 feet west of Turner Avenue, on the south aide of Main Street, (10085 Main Streret) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Assessor Parse! No: 209L~8S17 Legal Description: See Grant Deed in Addenda C Area of Ownership: .195 mare or less acres (8,500 square feet) Street Access Access is by fully improved (sidewalk, curbs, gutters) street to north of property -Main Steet. Topography. Level Improvements Single Family Residence (720 sq.ft., 2 bedrooms, 1 full bath) and 240 sq.ft. garage Tuning L -Low Residential, 2 - 4 density units per acre Site Influence: The property backs to railroad tracks Present Use= Single family residence A:,rhoai R. Roaliiva• SAncant nca Summary of Estimated Values Value of property (land only) is before condition: $ 10,625.00 Less value of the proposed land in easement: $ 500.00 Value of remainder land as part of the whole: $ 10,125.00 Value of remaining land in the after condition: $ 10,125.00 Value of improvements within proposed easement : $ 560.00 Severance Damages: $ 0.00 Special Benefits: $ 0.00 Total Just Compensation Value of the Part Taken in Easement: $ 960.00 Severance Damages. $ 0.00 Special Benefits: R n.nn TOf8L' $ 91iU.W OQ-N7-J21 8 SUMMARY OF SALIENT DATA Vesting: Gonzales, dce G. and Esperanza Location: 100 feet west of Turner Avenue oa the south side of Main Street (10077 Main Street) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Assessor Parcel No: 203085-12 Legal Descziption: See Grant Deed in Addenda C Area of Ownership: .195 more or less acres (8,500 square feet) Street Access: Access is by paved road to east with fully improved (sidewalk, curbs, gutters) street to north of property - Main Steer. Topography: Level Improvements 1 Single Family residence with 1 car gargage and 2 car carport. Zoning: L -Low Residential, 2 - 4 density units per acre Site Influence The property bac'N- t4 railroad tracks Present Use Single Family Residence Highest & Best Use Present use Summary of Estimated Values: Value of property (land only) in before condition: $ 10,625.00 Less value of the proposed land in easement: $ 500.00 Value of remainder land as part of the whole: $ 10,125.00 Value of remaining land in the aRer condition: $ 10,125.00 Value of improvements within proposed easement : $ 800.00 Severance Damages: $ 0.00 Special Benefits: $ 0,00 Total Just Compensation Value of the Part Taken in Easement: $ 1,300.00 Severance Damages: $ 0.00 Special Benefits: R nnn To41h $ ],300,00 0487-~iJl g INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS Purpose This appraisal report and analysis has been prepared at the request of the City of 12ancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of submitting an opinion of the market value of the larger parcel, the value of the part to be taken in easement for the Area VII Storm Drain Project and severance damages and/or special benefits to the remainder, if any, as of May 1,1987. Definitions Market Va]ue is the major focus of most real property appraisal assignments. Both ernnomic and legal definitions of mazket value have been developed and refined. Continual refinement is essential to the growth of ~e appraisal profession. The current ewnomic definition o£ market value ran be stated as follows: The most probable price in cash, terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms for which the appraised property will sell in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, sad for self- interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. Fundamental assumptions end conditions presumed in this defimition are: 1. Buyer sad seller are motivated by selfinterest; 2. Buyer and seller are well informed and are acting prudently, 3. The nrnnerty ie esruued fnr a reasnnahln Limn nn fha nncn marlro~• 4, Payment is made in cash, its equivalent, or in specified financing terms; 5. Specified financing, if any, may be the finan©ng actually in place or on terms generally available for the property type in its locale on the effective appraisal date; 6. The effect, if any, on the amount of market value of atypical 5nancing, ser~dces, or fens shall be clearly and precisely revealed in the appraisal report. American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, The Appraisal of Real Estate, 8th Edition (Chicago: Americar. Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, 19831. 04-b7~321 10 PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS DeSnitions (C~tinued) Hi h st and Best ise• The most profitable likely use to which a property can be put. The opinion of such use may be based on the highest and most profitable rontiaued use to which the property is adapted and needed or likely to be in demand in the reasonably near future. Fee Simnle F.atate~ Aa absolute fee, the fee ownership interest, fee without limitations to any particular class of heirs or restrictions, but subject to the limitations of eminent domain, escheat, police powers and taxation. &+v ran DamaPes• It is the diminution of the market value of the remainder area, in the case of a taking, which arises (a) by reason of the taking (severance), or (b) the construction of the improvements in the manner proposed. Roecial Benefits: Those benefits which accrue direMly and solely to the advantage of the property remaining after a partial taking. 04-87--311 11 INTRODUCTION ASSUMP'ITONS AND LIMiTIIVG CONDPITONS All of the data in this report is correct to the best of our knowledge subject to the following assumptions and limiting coadtions: Data, opinions and estimates have been gathered from various sources and the information obtained is assumed to be correct. Lump sum or percentage adjustments of market data are employed only for the purpose of aiding the appraiser to arrive at a preliminary indication of valve for the subject property. Information provided by the property owners, pazties to sales and others is assumed to be reliable but its accuracy is not guazanteed. As with all adjustments, the appraiser's experience must 6e given primary reliance over a mathematical procedure since many factors in the marketplace cannot be measured with mathematical preciseness. In the event court testimony is required, there will be an additional charge over and above the rate prescribed for the appraisal valuation. The appraiser assumes no liability for legal matters including those affecting title to the property and its validity. Unless otherwise stated, the maps, plats and exhibits included herein aze for lustration only, as an aid in visualizing matters discussed wiihin the report. They should not be considered as surveys or relied upon for any other purpose nor should they be used apart from this report. Title to the property is assumed to be marketable and free oC encumbrances, including, but not limited to, delinquencies, liens, mortgages, security agreements and financing statements. This appraisal report may not be reproduced without the written permission of the appraiser. No fractional part of this appraisal is to be used in conjunction wdth another appraisal. Such use renders it invalid. The appraiser reserves the right to make such adjustments to the valuation herein reported as may be required by consideration of additional data or more relative data that may become available. Appraising is not an exact science. The opinion of market value made in this report can be d.tTerent from the opinion of other appraiser. Information obtained for use in this anprnsal has h=_en conF rmed where pcssib!c and praNical a^d is believed to be true and correct to the best of our knowledge. However, no responsibility is assumed for errors or omissions, nor information not disclosed which might otherwise affect the valuation. The market value expressed in the report does not include the oil, gas and mineral rights. oa-a; azl I2 >rrrxonucrloN CERTIFICATION I certify that, to Ure beat of my Imowledge and belie[ The statements of tact contained in this report are true and correct The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have ao personal interest or bias with respect to the parties mvolved. My compensation is not contingent on as action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions, or conclusions ia, or the use of, this report. My analyses, opiaiona, and conclusions wero developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the American Institute of Rea] Estate Appraisers relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject oC this report. Ro one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. J. WII~I-IAb1 :14URPIIY AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING APPRA[SEPS i' ~ ~i- %~,~~,~G, ~ ./, Michael S. Murphy / 04.81-.',.,~ 13 GENERAL AREA DESCRIPTION AREA MAP ( ( x !° I J ~ C' f ~r ,l~-v ~ DOCC ~~ Pjr ~~~ ~~ i/ e,9'8;' ~ It+f I S it Q ~i ,fsr ~° ` I' • ~` io'''~FF tt(i jl ` ! P2 it { Pj 1~~@~ P r~ j ~ eP a g_ - I ~ j~~~' ~r~[PP.jEI~~P{1l~jr ~ p '°t`P F •f ;iL.!f r! Z~1 1 re e'}! ~ j,r. @1 r( t(~ ~~ ~ a _V ~ } a r J ~i ~ ~~ it • 111 ~~ { t~, S i ~ vJ C = / ~ l O ~Ie~e1~5l111if a ~~ {r,~ 3, ~jlP t~Pf /_ o O •` afl r. o . ~ U :t i y W -p y Y4d ~~: 5 ~ o 1 ~ ~; £ ~ c~'o } .X z`~ M+ :}=C€~! ', P T ' `~ ~i ~";_. f@ F~ :~ P{ ~I1 I .~\e _S i~ -,~~. /~~rr i ,.itr r P` "~j,re 11/ ' S 1.~-' °'` i ,f ~~.•' 1. ~,. { ,ia:: ;\ ~ i / _ P tee: ~ -. P v~~ P it °` 0~.-;p ~~`. i {t `°_ ~ i ~~;-.~J ' d ,j J I i i~'. ~~~ ~4R ~{ P t. L t R z to f It,. I~'I)`"rt--- 3~ 04-B ~ ~J21 11 GENERAL AREA DESCRD'T10N AREA DATA San Bernardino Canty Saa Bernardino County is the largest county in the continental United States and includes seventeen (17) incorporated cities. It's population of over one-million (1,000,000) is concentrated is Southern California. Within sixty (60) miles of the county seat are the urban centers of Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Orange County. Housing: The availability of housing for workers is a major resource of importance to businesses considering San Bernadino County for a plant or facility IocaNon. A wide range of home styles, prices, and locations are available in San Bernardino County. Home prices range fmm twenty-five (25'9) percent to (40%) less than comparable homes in the counties of Los Angeles and Orange. Locations vary from suburban residential subdivisions in the urban valley to estate developments in yeaz round resort settings. Transportation: Cajon Pass from the north brings Umon Pa~c Railmad'e main line and Interstate Fifteen (15). It also brings the Santa Fe Railroad and Interstate Forty (40) from the mid-west. San Gorgonio Pass next to Palm Springs brings the Southern Pa~c Railroad and Interstate Tea (IO) from Texas. For air travel, there is Ontario International Airport. It is the third laggest airport in Californa for volume of freight and passengers. Ontario International Airport is the only major facility in Southern California with significant capacity for expansion. Recreation: Regional parks provide open space and recreation For families in urban areas. The mountains provide summer and winter recreation, including several ski resorts. The lower deserts and Colorado River provide many nnnnrtn nitina to eninv nafnra f:am n ionaiH« n ~;lohln :._. 6,d6_ t6.. mountains and desert areas. Within-an hour's dme one can reach the Pacific Ocean and it's beaches. 04~87~J21 15 GENERAL AREA DESCRIP'ISON CITY MAP "" °+~mn ~ -j ~I-XN] f- _ -u.~~-"_- -. ~ ...,..I I., I' I" ~. SI ururo Rancho MIIAIIIO NI}E11X1fp WE MIIMI.i IOMtrE11~ Rancho (uamonga - ~,~~....X..m.. --; Mww.~~.. Y 1I Xal(hborEooE 66oDD~L . i..e~. r Vi °""~ ~ '~'~'° , r CavterE In w:, ~~ ~ ,.. w. . . ~ rancho : ~ ~ ~~ ... . ;, w .~ Dd-87-321 16 GENERAL AREA DESCRIPTYON CITY DATA City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga consists of the communities oC Etiwanda, Cucamonga, and Alta Loma within a 36.6 square mile area. The city averages between 1,050 to 2,400 feet above sea level end is in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains. The city is 50 miles from the Pacific Ocean, 120 miles north of San Diego and one-half way between the cities of Los Angeles and San Bernardino. Rancho Cucamonga is surrounded en the south, east sad nest by Ontaro, Fontana and Upland respectively. To the north of the city rises Cucamonga Peak and Mount Baldy, nearly 9,000 feet high. These mountains are within the Cucamonga wilderness area of the Saa Gabriel Mountains. Rancho Cucamonga enjoys Mediterraneaa•type sunbelt weather with warm summers and mild winters. The yeaz-round temperature averages from 46° to 95° fahrenheit. The northern reaches of the city, on raze occasions, have experienced light frost while some summer days are hot sad dry. The average yearly rainfall of 15 to 21 inches occurs predominantly during winter months. Coastal breezes cool the summer nights. Rancho Cucamonga was incorporated as a General Law City in November of 1977. It employs 100 full-time people and as average of 30 part-time workers on an annual budget of $20,000,000.00 under a CounseUMaaager form of government. The city of Rancho Cucamonga has formed the Industrial Specific Plan commitee which has recently worked with the city's staff on future development standards along 19th Street, Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard corridors. This is a community of unusual growth with the Southern California Association of Rnvc+~.,..+o..~c n.oA:~ti.,,. ,, . ~ cn nn_n ....: a___ _ w.. a _ _ population is over 65,000, which is an increaseVof 24,530 residents since 1977 (approximately 10 years). Business in the community grows yearly with nearly 4,000 active businesses registerd and over 24 retail centers with more proposed or under construction including the Victoria Gardens :1fa11. Rancho Cucamonga has numerous planned communities under construction or proposed that will accnmodate over 45,000 new residents. There are 15,000 acres set aside in the master plan for job-producing industries. Rancho Cucamonga is the home of 30 public and private elementary and secondary schools. Chaffey College is a comprehensive, tuition free community college offering students over 100 academic and vocational degrees and licenses. In addition, there are 25 other pres!iginus universities and colleges, 43 churches of every d2nomiratio^., and over 125 active chapters of various clubs and organizations all within close proximity to the city center. There aze 8 parks either n~tahi;che,i .,. Proposed in the city, the Community 5erices DBPYment ouci's over 120 year-round classes and programs Cor all ages. One oC the larger parks is host to an annual wine festival in honor of Rancho Cucamonga's winemaking heritage. U4~67-,lll 1 y GENERAL AREA DFSCRD'TION CITY DATA City of Rancho Cucamonga (Continued) Ranchc Cucamonga's transportation needs are served by the following Highways -Interstate 30 (San Bernardino Freeway, east and west); Interstate 15 (the Devore Freeway, north and south); State Highways 30 (proposed Foothill Freeway), and Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) also serves the community running east and west. Rail -The main track of the Santa Fe Railroad bisects the city, and has extensive reciprocal switching arrangements with Union Pacific and Southern pacific Railroads which run adjacent to the city. Trucking - There are 15-20 freight lines in Rancho Cucamonga and adjacent areas serving all transcontinental points. Overnight delivery is available to San Diego, San Francisco, Northern California, Arizona and Nevada. Air -Ontario International Airport with its recently constructed runway for wide body aircraR is at the southern boundary of Rancho Cucamonga. The 1,463 acre airport serviced 1,805,383 passengers in 1981, and three million passengers in 1984. It is expected that the airport will serve twelve milioa passengers by 1990. Ontario International is in the process of constructing a new terminal , Ttus terminal will be built in two phases, the first phase to be completed by 1968. There aze also three general at~ation airports within 30 to 20 minutes of Rancho Cucamonga's city center. Water -The deep-water Worts of ins Aroao~ ,_. c.,___ o..a__ __ ., . are ,lust an hour from Rancho Cucamonga _ W V ~~y ..~.~s Lv"" Buses -The Omnitrans system operates three regional mass transit lines, a paratransit system, and a dial-a-ride system in Rancho Cucamonga for commuters and locals, with connections to transcontinental carrriers neazby, 0•l-87,72: 18 AE,SCRIP17ON SANCflEZ -PHOTO ANA PLAT MAP ---^------~..;-----.~ ~. ro ~~ i W ) , rt ~ ~.. .. : ~.. ' v 1 ~. 2 SOT 2 ~+`' ` /l.. W a < w a~ l V ~JJ ° ,', ~ ®, t0T ! ST~,r .p M •~ ~ , j t rl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 19 , .. DESCRIFr'1'fON SANCFIEZ • ANALYSIS Vesting Angel G. end Josephine O. Sanchez Caution Northeast corner of 1~rner Avenue and Main Street is the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernazdino Co. California Assessor's Parcel Number 209.085.16 Legal Description See Grant Deed in Addenda C Area of Ownership .19 more or less acres (8,482 square feet) Street Aooess Access is by paved mad to east with fully improved (sidewalk, curbs, gutters) street to north of property -Main Steet. Topography level; built up on northeast to approximately 2 to 3 Ceet above street level Improvements 2 to 3 foot high block retaining wall 11471ineaz feet) Zoning L -Low Residential, 2 - 4 units per acre per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's development Districts Map revised in October of 1986 Site Influence The subject property backs to railroad tracks owned end maintained by the ,12chinaon Topeka and °arta Fe RdilL Odd Com oanv. Acnudine t„ Neil Leverton, Cheif Dispatcher, this is the main track between Chicago and Los Angeles. It is used by 6.5 thru freight trains and approximatley 4 local freight trans, serving ;oca] industrial areas, per day and travel at speeds oC 55 miles per hour. Amtrak has 2 passenger trains using the track on a daily basis and they travel up to 60- miles per hour. Altogett r, trains pass behind the subject property 12.5 times per day traveling at speeds up to 55 • 60 miles per Sour. 04-87-321 20 DESCRIP'iTON SANCHEZ -ANALYSES (CONTIN[1ED) Present Use Vacant Lend Highest & Beat Use: Highest and beat use is defined as the most profitable likely use to which a property can be pug The opinion of such use may be based oa the highest and most profitable continued use to which the property is adapted and needed or likely to be in demand in the reasonably neaz future. After considering the pertinent data available to the appraiser, the utility of the subject, as well as uses in the general area, the highest and best use for the subject property is for future development with a single family residence OM1~S--321 21 VALUATION SANCFIkZ Method of Veluatlon The appraisal of real property results is forming en opinion oC market value after considering ell of the political, social, economic and physical forces that have a bearing upon the land end improvements to the lead. The reliability and accuracy of the opinion will be in direct. relationship to the objectivity and competency of the appraiser and also the availability of relevant data. The three classic approaches to value are as follows: r°at~..tlDproash: 'fire Cost Approach ie based on the value of the land without improvements to which the contributory value of the improvements are added, less depreciation. Tnrome Anyro~ The Income Approach is based oa the anticipated benefits of property ownership. Fair rental income less typical expenses is determined to arrive at net income. This net income is then capitalized into an indication of value. Market Data Anprn_nSh; The Market Data Approach or Comparison Approach, is based on the sale of properties similar to the subject. Comparisons are made between the sales and subject with adjustments made for the difference to arrive at a comparative unit of value. White a71 of the approaches to value were considered, due to the nature of the report, the Mazket Data Approach was relied upon in valuing the subject land as though vacant and the Cost Approach was used to estimate the value of the 04~87~321 22 VALUATION SANOFIFl LARGER PARCII. The sales data included with the report occurred sufficiently near is time and involved properties which are in reasonable proximity to, sufficiently alike is character, situation, usability, adaptability end size to be comparable to the property subject of this appraisal. The prices paid or to be paid in these sales do, in our judgement, reflect the market price level in the area and ere helpful in estimating the value of the subject of this appraisal. The following chart penvides a synopsis of the sales used in our report: Sales Chart 1. July 15,1986 $ 288,000.00 184,694 $ 1.56 2. Apri115,1986 $ 307,530.00 282,269 $ 1.09 3. Oct 28,1985 $ 135,000.00 111,078 $ 1.22 4. July 24,1985 $ 215,000.00 239,580 $ 0.90 Sales Analysis Sale No l is located south of 19th Street between Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue and approximately 3 miles northwest of the subject .The 184,694 square foot pazce] add on Jury 15, 1956 for $258,000.00, reflecting SL56 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time of sale and is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre. Adjustments were made for size, time and location. After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property land, based on Sale No. 1 is: S ]1,870.00 Reflecting $ 1.40 per square foot Ga]r Nn is located approximately 208 feet east of Amethyst Street on the south side of 19th Street and is approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the subject . The 282,269 squaze foot parcel sold on April 15, 1986 for $307,530, or $1.09 per square foot. The property is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre, and was vacant at the time of sale. Adjustments were made for size and time . Atter adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property based on Sale D7o. 2 is: $ 17,000.00 F.cnecting $ 1.30 pe; square fcct 048 i :121 23 VALUATION SANCI~L LARGER PARCEL Sales Analysis (Continued) Salo No R is located approumately 250 Ceet south of Highland Avenue on the west side of Haves Avenue and ie 3 miles northeast of the subject. The 111,078 square foot property sold on October 28,1985 for $155,000 which reflects $1.22 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time oC sale and is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2.4 density units per acre. Adjustments were made for location, time and size. After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property based on Sale No. 3 is: $ ll,500.00 Reflecting $ 1.36 per square foot Sale Nn 4 is located on the southeast corner of Viaeyazd Avenue and Calls Del Prado and is approumately 2.5 miles northwest of the subject. The 239,580 square foot property sold on July 24,1985 for $215,000.00, reflecting $0.90 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time of sale and ie zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre. Adjustments were made for time, size and location. An upward adjustment was made because of topography and a downward adjustment was made for view amenity. After adjustments, the estimated va]ue of the subject property based on Sale No. 4 is: S 10,]80.00 Reflecting $ 1.20 per square foot Sales Summary The following chart provides a summary of the estimated value of the subject land as if vacant based on mazket data sales 1 through 4. Sales summary Chart .Yv. Deod Da < Het7ected Price .object Sn Ft 1. July 15,1986 $ 11,870.00 8,482 2. Apri115, 1986 $ 11,OW.00 8,482 3. Oct 29,1985 $ 11,500.00 8,482 4. July 24,1985 $ 10,180.00 8,482 PricelSa.Ft. $ I.ao $ 1.30 $ 1.36 $ 1,20 04~87~321 yt VALUATION SANCF>Q LARGER PARCEL Conclu~on The adjusted sales show a range in pro-rata value for the subject land of $ 1.20 per square foot to $ 1.40 per square Coot. While land values are rising in the general area, the area of the subject is considered less desireable due to location and the dimuaition of value caused by the railroad tracks. After considering the pertinent data available to the appraiser as well as general factors in the market place, sad our own experience in real estate, the final estimate of value of the subject land as if vacant is: $ 10,600.00 Re0ec[ing$ L25 per aquas foot UL87-3^.! ~ PARTTAKEN {EASEME, 7T) SANCHEZ-PHOTO AND PARCEL MAP C a r v e ., J L ~~ C ^. OA 87 321 A. T B S. f RAILROAD ,1 i~ 6 I !o ~ a ~ I m '~ ov o~.a i ~. e <NO ~ Wm _ O A?v0 I n; a v not S M~ ^e I ~ ~ m~' ~ 3 I ~ +.. 0 ~~ u 26 MA/N S rREE7 n n J 4 O O ^n w1 'V PARTT,AREN (EASFvt'fE'VT) Description Land SANCHFZ A legal description of the part to be taken as provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga is as follows: Assessors Parcel Number 209-085-16 An easement for storm drain purposes along that portion of Lots 1 and 2, Block 12, according to the Map of the Towa of West Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 13 of Maps, Page 1 and 2, Records of San Bernardino County. The property acquired by deed in favor of Ange] G. Sanchez and Josephine O. Sanchez, Husband and Wife; recorded March 6, 1985, as Instrument No. 85- 052055, of Official Records; the easement more particularly described as follows: The south 20.00 feet of said Lots 1 and 2 of said Block 12 of the Town of West Cucamonga. The total area of the part take is estimated to be 1,000 squaze feet. It consists of as area that is roughly 20 feet X 50 feet. (See map on facing page) ?Innrovements There are no improvements found to be within the designated take area. Valuation LaII~ Value of the part taken as estimated to be 40~ic of the pro-rata value of $ i.25 per square foot is summarized as follows: Part Taken (1,000 sq.ft. ®$1.25 per sq.ft.) x 4090 = $ 500.00 There are no improvements within the take azea. Total Land $ 500.00 i4iNru4euier is °, 000 Total $ 500.00 oa.e~ gat 2 PART TAl~1V (EASII1'lENN'f9 SANCFIFZ Severance Damages The part taken does not aR'ect the utility or value of the remainder. Therefore, it is our opinion that there are no severance damages. Special Benefiffi The proposed improvement has no appazent affect on the value of the subject property. IC is a 6eae5k to the neighborhood as a whole and not specific to the subject. Thereforn, we do not feel there are any special benefits relative to the subject property. Total Just Compensation Value of the Part Taken $ 5pp.pp Severance Damages $ p,pp Specal ]3ene5ts $ 0 t>n TotaL• $ Spp,pp at-F?321 2& W W ao ~ i 7 a a LOT 3 L07 2 (_, BLVD. °. I, I w. 9 Q . e:. q _.,/. ~~ - ~i ~~,'~, .., -~Q~ a MGIN SiREE7 q l[ ~6 /- yyyp~~~ ~. - A~ `• i F ~ ' Uf()f(0 OIIM / `~ Ir - 1 i DESCRIP170N VII.LARRFei -PHOTO AND PLAT MAP DESCRD~fION Vesting Villarreal, et al VILLe1RREAI. -ANALYSIS Location 50 feet west oC Turner Avenue, on the south side of Main Street (10085 Main Street) in the City oC Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino Co. California Assessor's Parcel Number 209-085-17 Legal Description See Grant Deed in Addenda C Area of Ownership .195 more or less acres (8,500 squaze feet) Street Access Access is by fully improved (sidewalk, curbs, gutters) street to north of property -Main Steet. Topography bevel Improvements 720 square foot residence with 2 bedrooms and 1 full bathroom; 240 square foot single caz garage, miscellaneous fencing. See schematic on page 32. Zoning L -Low Residential, 2 - 4 units per acre per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's development Districts Map revised in October of 1986 Site Influence The subject property backs to railroad tracks owned and maintained by the Atchinson Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co. According to Neil Leverton, ~'hcif 'Jispntchcr tF~ ,hn .., ., r: nck 1~Ceq.ee; Cnir_ n and Lee AP.g_ ._ It is used by 6.5 Ebro freight trains and approximatley'4 local freight trans, seeing local industrial areas, per day, a! speeds of 55 miles per hour. Amtrak has 2 passenger trains using the track on a daily basis traveling up to 60- miles per hour. Altogether, trains pass behind the subject property 12.5 times per day traveling at speeds up to 60 miles per hour. 0487 ~'.:1 30 DESCRIPTION 'tm.T.ARRF.ei.. ANALySI3 (CONTINI7ED) Present Use Vacant Land Highest & Best Uee: Highest and beat use is defined as the most profitable likely use to which a property can 6e put. The opinion of such use may be based on the highest and most profitable continued use to which the property is adapted and needed or likely to be is demand in the reasonably neaz future. After considering the pertinent data available to the appraiser, the utility of the subject, as well as uses in the general area, the highest and best use for the subject property is for its present use. OJ-8- 921 31 DESCRIPTYON VIIZARREAL SCHEMATIC so' 0 h AP. X1200-085-018 240 s.f. Garage ~ 2' '~ Back Porch h House girt 920 sq.ft. 30' Driveway 24' 40' setback from street f Scale S 1"=20' Fencing ____ Improvements Concrete 1 car garage Construction: stucco exterior with flat Spanish style mof 2 bedroom, 1 bathroom Construction: Wood Frame with stucco exterior on raised woad floors with crawl space, Wood double hung windows, Composition shingle roof. Fencing: Franc and east side is brick pillar with wrought iron (gala at front walkway and double gate for driveway) West side is steel past with chainlink. 04.87.721 ~ Paved Street Improvements 32 VALUATION Method of Vah~ation The appraisal of real property results is forming as opinion of market value after considering all of the political, social, economic and physical forces that have a bearing upon the land and improvements to the land. The reliability and amurary of the opinion will be in direct relationship to the objectivity and competency of the appraiser and also the availability of relevant data. The three classic approaches to value are as follows: Cost Annrnach: The Cost Approach is based on the value of the land without improvements to which the contributory value of the improvements are added, less depreciation. Income An rn oach. The Income Approach is based on the anticipated benefits of property ownership. Fair rental income less typical expenses is determined to arrive at net income. This net income is then capitalized into an indication of value. Market Data Annroach: The Market Data Appmach or Comparison Approach, is based on the sale of properties similar to the subject. Comparisons are made between the sales and subject with adjustments made Cor the difference to arrive at a comparative unit of value. While all of the approaches to value were considered, due to the nature o£ the report, the Mazket Data Approach was relied upon is valuing the subject land as thouah vacant and the Cost Aooroach was used to estimate the value of the improvements in the easement area. 04~8i~J21 33 VALUATION VILLARREAL LARGER PARCEL The sales data included with the report occurred sufSciently near is time and involved properties which are in reasonable proximity to, sutficieatly alike in character, situation, usability, adaptability and size to be comparable to the property subject of this appraisal. The prices paid or to be paid in these sales do, in our judgement, reflect the market price level is the area and aze helpful in estimating the value oC the subject of this appraisal. The following chart provides a synopsis oC the sales used in our report: Sales Chart N¢ Deed Date S rs1o p~ Area (s. f) 1. July 15,1986 $ 288,000.00 184,694 $ 1.56 2. April 15, 1986 $ 307,530.00 282269 $ 1.09 3. Oct 28,1985 $ 135,000.00 111,078 $ 1.22 4. July 24,1985 $ 215,000.00 239,580 $ 0.90 Sales Analysis Sale No l is located south o£ 19th Street between Bery] Street and Hellman Avenue and approximately 3 miles northwest of the subject . The 184,694 square foot pazcel sold on July 15, 1986 for $288,000.00, reflecting $1.56 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time of sale and is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre. Adjustments were mane for size, time and location. ACter adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property land, based on Sale No. 1 is: $11,900.00 Reflecting $ 1.40 per square foot Sale N° 2 is located approxmately 208 feet east of Amethyst Street on the south side of 19th Street and is approximately 2,5 miles northwest of the subject . The 282,269 square foot parcel sold cn April 15, 1986 for $307,530, or $1.09 per square foot. The property is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre, and ass vacant at the time of sale- Adjustments were made for size and time . After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property based on Sale No. 2 is: $ 11.500.00 Reflecting $ 1.30 per square foot 04~87~^~^I &4 VALUATION LARGER PARCEL Sales Analysis (Continued) Cale No R i located approzimately 250 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west side of Haven Avenue and is 3 miles northeast of the subject. The 111,078 square foot property sold on October 28, 1985 for $135,000 which reflects $1.22 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time of sale and is zoned L, for Low Residential. 2-0 density units per acre. Adjustments were made for location, time and size. After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property based on Sale No. 3 is: $ 11,560.00 Reflecting $ 1.36 per square foot Cale No 4 is located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calls Del Prado and is approrimately 2.5 miles northwest of the subject. The 239,580 square foot property sold on July 24, 1985 Cor $215,OOOAO, reflecting $0,90 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time of sale and is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre. Adjustments were made for time, size and location. An upward adjustment was made because of topography and a downward adjustment was made for view amenity. After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property based on Sale No. 4 is: S 10,2A0.00 Reflecting $ 1.20 per square foot Sales Summary The following chart provides a summary of the estimated value of the subject land as if vacant based on market data sales 1 through 4. Sales summary Chart Yo. D Dat R flee ed Pri Stebjpct So Ft 1. ,July 15,1986 2. April 15, 1986 3. Oct 28, 198.1 4. J~.ily 24,1985 11,900.00 8,500 11,050.00 8,500 11,560.00 8,500 10,200.00 8,500 PricelSo.Ft. $ 1.40 $ 1.30 $ 1.36 $ 1.20 04~tl. J21 35 VALUATION ConcYusion IARGIIi PARCII. The adjusted sales show a range in pro-rata value for the subject land of $ 1.20 per square foot to $ 1.40 per square foot. While land values are rising is the general area, the area of the subject ie considered leas desireable due to location and the dimunition of value caused by the railroad tracks. After considering the pertinent data available to the appraiser as well as general factors in the market place, and our own experience in real estate, the final estimate of value of the subject land as if vacant is: $ 7osz5.oo 77eflectiug$ 725 per square foot 0487 921 36 PART TART) (EASEMENT) VII.LARREAL - PH01'O AND PARCEL MAP A.7 d S. F do RA/LRDAD I I ' ~' o I ~ ~'I ~'~.~ ~ I o y \ ~ n I i ~'~ r en' V I os o. 1~ ~ o ~ ~~ n 'y C ~ no' ~ •; ' n~, 11~ '~, , , , awn ~ ~ ~ 11 l I ~ " oR . nr- ~ I ~ ~ •~~ i _ I f ~1 ~ ~ ~ ;~ °~ fp ~ w' _~ ~ I J ~'r , j I I ~ ~ i l o c ( `~ Imo- \ I / (M~S7~321 37 MA/N S rREET PART TAKEN (EASEM):Nf Description Land A legal description of the part to be taken as provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga is as follows: Assessors Parcel Number 209-085-17 An easement for storm drain purposes along that portion of Lots 3 and 4, Block 12, according to the Map of the Town of West Cucamonga, as per plat recerded in Book 13 of Maps, Page 1 and 2, Records of San Bernardino County. The property acquired by deed in favor of Rafaela A. Villarreal, a Widow, A.K.A. Rafaela Villarreal; Marie A. Villarreal, a Single Woman, Amelia V. Sandoval, a Married Woman, A.K.A. Amelia A. Villazreal; and Rosario V. Summers, a Married Woman, A.K.A. Rosario A. Villarreal, as Tenants in Common; each to an undivided 1/4 interest, recorded December 1, 1966, as Instrument No. 30, of OtFcial Records; the easement more particularly desmibed as follows: The south 20.00 feet of said Lots 3 and 4 of said Block 12 0£ the Town of West Cucamonga. The total area of the part take is estimated to he 1,000 square feet. It consists of as area that is roughly 20 feet Y 50 feel. (See map on facing page) Improvementa_ Improvements within the 1,000 squaze foot take area include 20 feet of chainlink fencting on the west side, (2) 4"x 4" posts on east property line, 1 mature tree on rear property line, 1 medium citrus tree, and 4 grape vines. Valuation Land Value of the part taken as estimated to be 409c of the pro•rata value of $ 1.25 per square foot is summarized as follows: Part Taken (1,000 sq,fl. ®$1.25 per sq, fl.) x 4090 = $ 500.00 2v' Chainiink fencing $ 100.00 (2) 4"x4" wood posts $ 10.00 (1) Mature tree $ 200.00 (i) Medium Citrus tree $ 50.00 (4) Grape vines $._ t (N1.00 $ 460.00 04-8. d2i 38 PARTTAKEN (EASFIVIENI') Valva4oa (Continued) Total Land $ 500.00 Improvements 3 46p,QQ Total $ 960.00 Severance Damages5 The part taken does not affect the utility or value of the remainder. Therefore, it is our opinion that there are no severance damages. Special Benefits The proposed improvement has no apparent affect on the value of the subject property. It is a bene5t to the neighborhood as a whole and not specific to the subject. Therefore, we do not feel there are any special benefits relative to the subject property. Total Just Compensation Value of fhe Part Taken $ 960.00 Severance Damages $ 0.00 Special Benefits 4 0.00 TotaL• $ 960.00 04~A7~3:" 39 DESCRD'I7ON GONZAI.ES • PHOTO AND PLAT MAP L'J I I BLVD. ~ 10 ~ ~ ~' ~ ~V ~ ~ ti w w I a = LOT 2 \^ • '.L,~'` ~. .. .. ~ W '• L q ~ . _ 4 ~~L\ O .. ~S i ~. .~. - "e MAIN L07 J STREET R - i•C' ~. I wR' tr uY. i~ ~ 1 ~ P , ~~ ` ~ I . ~. ti ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' 111 94~R7-321 ~ ~ 40 I 1 DESCRIPCION GONZALES -ANALYSIS Vesting Jce G. end Esperaaza A. Gonzales Inc-atiwi 100 feet west of'hcrner Avenue on the south side of Dlain Street (10077 Main Street) is the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemazdino Co. California Assessor's Parcel Number 209-08,512 Legal Description See Grant Deed is Addenda C Area of Ownership .195 more or less acres (8,500 square feet) Stteet Access Access is by fully improved (sidewalk, curbs, gutters) street to north of property • Main Steet. Topography Level Improvements 2 bedroom and 2 full bath single family residence (1,462.5 square feet) in gocd condition with single cat garage and 2 car attached carport; miscellaneous fencing and concrete. Please see the schematic on paga 43. Zoning L -Low Residential, 2 - 4 units per acre per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's development A,triets Map revised in October of 1986. Site Influence The suhject property backs to railroad tracks owned and maintained by the Atch insen Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company. According to Veil nL _:f n:_... a..i.. •L... :.. •l.n .n n..L Fn~...nnn 1'n i,ereitilII, i.,~c,l ai~ayo,..uv:, ~~.a .~ ...~ wain tr ...... ..................:Cage non Inc eingeles. It is used by 6.5 thru freight trains and approzimatley 4 local freight trans, serving local industrial areas, per day and travel at speeds of 55 miles per hour. Amtrak has 2 passenger trains using the track on a daily basis and they travel up to 60 miles per hour. Altogether, trains pass behind the subject pmperty 12.5 times per day traveling at spec sup to 55 - 60 miles per hour, oa N; _. DESCRIPITON GONZALES -ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Amsent Use Single family residential Highest & Best Use: Highest and best use is defiaed ae the moat profitable likely use to which a property can be put. The opinion of such use may be based oa the highest and most profitable continued use to which the property is adapted and nee3ed or likely to be is demand is the reasonably near future. After considering the pertinent data available fn the appraiser, the utility of the subjeM, as well as uses in the general area, the highest and best use for the subject property is for the present use. Oa-87~s~1 a2 DESCRII'IZON GONZALFS • SCHEMATIC 50' Garden GOIV7N.ES A.P, i209A85A12 C m m m 30' < ~ N V' 2.5 N 25' I Carport 1 Scale S 1" = 20' Concrete Improvements - 1 car garage Construction: stucco exterior with flat Spanish style roof 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom Uonstruction: wood r'rame with stucco exterior on raised wood floors with crawl space. Aluminum sliding windows. Composition shingle roof. Condition: Good 40'setback from street 7.5' 1,462.5 sq.fk House 20 24' Fencing: Front is brick pillar with wrought iron (gate at front walkway end double gate for driveway'i. Wcct aide is hrick/wood and east side is steel post with chainlink, rear fencing is wood picket with 2 rails 0,;.g7.;tp1 • Paved Street Improvements 43 VALUATION Method of Valuation GONZAI.ES The appraisal of real property results in forming an opinion of market value after considering all of the political, social, economic and physical forces that have a bearing upon the land end improvements to the land. The reliability and accuracy of the opinion will be in direct relationship to the objectivity and competency of the appraiser and also the availaMlity of relevant data. The three classic approaches to value are ea follows: C^e~cp3Gh: The Cost Approach ie base3 on the value of the land without improvements to which the contributory value of the improvements are added, less depreciation. Income Anornach: The Income Approach is based on the anticipated benefits of property ownership. Fair rental income less typical expenses is determined to arrive at net income. This net income is then capitalized into an indication of value. Market Data An rn °aeh. The Market Data Approach or Comparison Approach, is based on the sale of properties similar to the subject. Comparisons are made between the sales and subject with adjustments made for the difterence to arrive at a comparative unit of value. ~i'hife all of the approaches to value were considered, due to the nature of the report, the Market Data Approach was relied upon in valuing the subject land as though vacant and the Cost Approach was used to estimate the value of the improvements in the easement arra 04~8'7~321 qq VALUATTON GON7el cc LARGER PARCEL The sales data included with the report occurred sufHMently near in time and involved properties which are in reasonable pmumity to, auf5ciently alike in character, situation, usability, adaptability and size to be comparable to the property subjeM of this appraisal. The prices paid or to be paid in these sales do, in our judgement, reflect the market price level in the area and are helpful in estimating the value of the subject of this appraisal. The following chazt provides a synopsis of the sales used is our report: Sales Chart {V Deed Date Sn~ r I 1. July 15,1986 E 288,000.00 164,694 $ 1.56 2. April 15,1986 $ 307,530.00 282269 $ 1.09 3. Oct 28,1985 $ 135,000.00 111,078 $ 1.22 4. July 24,1985 $ 215,000.00 239,580 $ 0.90 Sales Analysis Sale Nn l is located south of 19th Street between Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue and approximately 3 miles northwest of the subjecE .The 184,694 square foot pazeel sold on July 15, 1986 for $288,000.00, reflecting $1.56 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time of sale and is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre. Adjustments were made for size, time and location. After adjustments, the estimated value of the subjeM property land, based on Sale No. 1 is: $11,900.00 Reflecting $ 1.40 per square foot S~ WIo 2 is located appm~daate:y 208 feet east of Amethyst Street oa Ehe south side of 19th Street and is appmumately 2.5 miles northwest of the subject . The 282,269 square foot parcel sold on April 15, 1986 for $307,530, or $1.09 per squaze foot. The property is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2.4 density units per acre, and was vacant at the time of sale. Adjustments were made for size and time . After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property based on Sale No. 2 is: $ 11,050.00 Reflecting $ 1.30 pc square fcM Of-A. J21 45 VALUATION GONZAI.F,S LARGER PARCEL Sales Analysis (Continued) Gale Na 3;s located apprmdmately 250 feet south of Highland Avenue on the west side of Haven Avenue and is 3 miles northeast of the subject. The 111,078 squaze foot property sold on October 28, 1985 for $135,000 which reflects $1.22 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time of sale and is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units pe: acre. Adjustments were made for location, time and size. After adjustments, the estimaed value of the subject property based on Sale No. 3 is: $ 11,560.00 Reflecting $1.36 per square foot Sale No 4 is located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calls Del Prado and ie approumately 2.5 miles northwest of the subject. The 239,580 squaze foot property sold on July 24,1985 for $215,000.00, reflecting $0.90 per square foot. The property was vacant at the time of sale and is zoned L, for Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre. Adjustments were made for time, size and location. An upward adjustment was made because of topography and a downward adjustment was made for view amenity. After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject property based on Sale No. 4 is: $ 10,2(W.00 Re0ecting $ 1.20 per square foot Sales Summsrv The following chart provides a summary of the estimated value of the subject land as if vacant based on mazket data sales 1 through 4. 1. 2. 3. 4, Sales st+mma*y Chart D..2P~P¢te R eRacted Price $ub~ect 5q,~t, Jalyls,lsas g u,soo.oo s,soo Apri115, 1986 $ 11,050.00 8,500 Oct 28, 1985 $ 11,560.00 8,500 July 24,1985 $ 10,200.00 8,500 PP~.~a Ft $ 1.40 $ 1.30 $ 1.36 $ 1.20 04.8;3'21 46 VALUATION GONZALFS IARGERPARCEL Conclusion The adjusted sales show a range in pro-rata value for the subject land of $ 1.20 per square foot to $ 1.40 per square foot. While land values are rising in the general area, the area of the subjeM is considered less desireable due to location and the dimunition of value caused by the railroad tracks. After considering the pertinent data available to the appraiser as well as general factors in the market place, and our own experience in real estate, the Snal estimate of value of the subject land as if vacant is: $ 10,625.00 Reflecting $125 per square foot as-s~~su a~ PART TARN (EA.SII1'IF.1`IT) GONZALES .PHOTO AND PARCEL MAP A.7 d SF io o i <0-1 I Im ~~ti ;a ~ i a~r ~ ~ ,J ~i~ ~ ~. J ~~r~ ~ _ ~\I~ ~ I~, /~ Oa-A i-321 MAIN =o RA/L.ROAO ~~ v In !~; ]V w~' ow + Q n o. A;~ w "O ^ n Ov ~ n ° ' S 1 a ~o~~ n , ~ I l ;xr ~• ;~ ~ : ~ y ( oe` a - a> b~ i . ~s ~~ i J A ° ew„ i J~ `I n o 1~~ ~~ 1' ~~~~~i~~~~ ~~~~~.r~ ~ ""' S Tl7££T ~ ae ~, O J /Q A! "I ti a n ^0.. Y n PART TARN (EASE~~NT') Desription Land GQN7.Ai.FC A legal description of the part to be taken as provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga is as follows: Assessors Pazcel Number 209-085-12 An easement for storm drain purposes along that portion of Lots 5 and 6, Block 12, according to the Map of the Town of West Cucamonga, as per plat recorded is Book 13 oCMaps, Page 1 and 2, Records of San Bernazdiao County. The property acquired by deed in favor of Toe G. Gonzales and Esperanza A. Gonzales, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants, recorded August 12, 1957, as Instrument No. 118, of Official Records; the easement more particularly described as follows: The south 20.00 feet of said Lots 5 and 6 of said Block 12 of the Town of West Cucamonga. The total area of the part take is estimated to be 1,000 square feet. It consists of an area that is roughly 20 feet X 50 feet. (See map on facing page) Improvements located within the 1,000 square foot take area include 4' high picket fencing (701iaeaz feet) with 2 rails and 4" pickets approximately 2" apart; 20 linear feet of 3 foot high fencing constructed of H•mesh with wood posts spaced 5 - 6.5 feet apart (garden tencmg); plants m garden consist of approximately 10 each onions, peppers, radishes and green beans; other plants in the take area are 1 medium and 1 large prickly pear cactus, 1 medium miscellaneous cactus, 4 medium rose bushes, 1 geranium plant and 1 medium tree. Valuation Land Value of the part taken as estimated to be 40r of the pro-rata value of $ 1,25 per square foot is summarized as follo•.as: Part Take (1,000 sq.ft. ~ 31.25 per sq.tt.l z 409a = $ 500.00 04-o7;>SI 49 PART TARN (FASEMEh"I') Valuation (Continued) CONZAI.ES Tmprovemente 70' wood picket fencing $ 350.00 20' wood/wiro fencing 100.00 (40) vegetable plants 50.00 (2) Priddy Peaz Cactus 50.00 (1) Cactus 25,00 (~) Medium Rose Bwhes lOG.00 (1) Geranium 25.00 (1)Medium Tree 700.00 $ 800.00 Tota] Land Improvements Total Severance Damages $ 500.00 Pf1~Q! $ I+300.00 The pazt taken does not affect the utility or value of the remainder. Therefore, it is our opinion that there are no severance damages. Special Benefits The proposed improvement has no apparent affect on the value of the subject property. It is a benefit to the neighborhood as a whole and not specific to the _..~.:__. mom.... ~_.. . ,. ... _. ~~w ~~•• -~~. c+~ , o ~~ ++~• +cm uucac ac auy ayeuu ueueiua +eiauVe w tue subject property. Total Just Compensation Value of the Part Taken $ 1,300.00 Severance Damages $ 0.00 Special Benefits S 000 Total• $ 1,300.00 OJ-87-3^,t 50 I ~-- ` m ' ~~ \ll .. _ - ~ ~ j ,.. i . ,~ ~ u ~ I E --. '_T. ._1. .,', `ham--H_ ya __ _ Eanvarv '; "': ADDS.\'DA A ' ._~ i- . _ _-. - + ~ d "~ "' i MARKET DATA LOCATION SLAP i t j ~ f 6~ f a. S y"'I i ~~ ~' ~fM a _i a I L ti l l 'j i ~" ~i-1 :1 i~ ~ ~ ~ I r ' "' ~ IF _ i `f a' i ~n~EWaV . ~ ~~ `~_`~ ,fin- ~ ~ C ~--~ arr% Isr ~i s-a: ~. _ I - 1~I i~... ~ .~.w. pit?. 'M~fi +n~~f ~ _--- r ~iy~ ~ a ire. l ~,i J~~ i ~ ~ ~~~ ,'!:~ ~~ s .,. 1 e 6a 9f uHE, i ne(' f ~ ~ . "ua\ .. u ~ [~uf M1. ~_ J ~ B„mil i ~~.yyy 1f ' a.a .. .n : -.~ a r+-~.~ .~~! F ~ Ins * Y-'- it ~-~ I~ .y' ~~ Y"4 ' t 1 i' i 3 y ~ ~ I T J I~ .y ~ I ~~ t ~ :.y ~~ s^ f Id ~ y ~ y b ~ y' ~uu .i 1 ~"~. f .... --' ~ _I .~~.-~ .__ j ~u N ~ V - 'i .i q I ~ - • ~ p ~ I a 1 ~~_ v n., ".~_< f., ~ ~~ ~ .. I. ~___ < < .I ~ L.r ... ..f-_ • .~- ~r . _. ... ~, -+,r r ' I ~. -}-~ ~ r ~ * ... ''~. ~ i ~ ~I~ i' I _ .a I, ;, r --e- ~`-- -r- -_ _ r f ~ ~~~ ~ :. y, .. View of Sale Taken oa April 24, 1987 J ~ .. _ ~~N ,a~~rue: t '-l.~ ,.e .. ..,. 66 ~, / ~' ~l' ~' Iv' ~ o ~ s ~ ~' ' ~ I ~ ' ' '~- i ~ (R_ 4 ~ ¢ ~ D ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ G y ~ C. G ~~ : ~ n' •x ~ ~ ~ - -- _;~ ~e~ ~ © $ m i ~ , ..i _i :r ~~ i ~I t i .4~• ~/ ' C j I ~ ~ ~ ® ~ y ~ ® ~; 4 2 c I d ~ ~ OO ,~.~ .. , -BERrL 57AEE7: T~ riR i,< MARI{ET DATA NO.1 ADDENDA B MARKET DATA NO.1 DATE OF DEED: July 15,1966 ASSESSORS PARCEL NOa 202-041.03 and 52 LOCATION: South of 19th Street between Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California LEGAL DESCRII'TION: Please see the attached Grand Deed LAND AREA: 4.24 acres;184,694.40 square feet ZONE Zoning. L -Low Residential, 2d density units per acre Use at Sale: ' Vacant land UTIIJ ITFS: Water. Available flechicily. Available Gas: Available Telephone: Available TOPOGRAPHY: Slightly irregular with stream beds ACCESS: Good, fronts to 19th Street iMPR(1VF.14TP.NTS• Nnna RECORDING DATA: July 28, 1986, Document No. 86-209876 GRANTOR: Pilgrims Investment Corp., et al GRA,\^1'EE: Nordic Development Co. PURCHASE PRICE: $288,000.00; $1.56 per square foot TE1i117S: Cash VERIFICATION: Grantee 04-87321 ora.r Na. 5~')oa7e aCl. Evow Ne. 17]5-SC .lwn NV. NNFN IIfC0I1DED MF.II TO NORDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 3900 Benk o[ Ameziee Towez Ono CSty eoulevartl Meet Oun9e, CA. 93669 oi9~l.QJL71 V _..._ .~. _....-_._..._ ._. DODJ.BItAIIY TbYai[fl 7A%a l1A an EAME AS ABOVE 'Y~~"ei"°M1""""°""°""'o""'^R'n ew.wm. an 1MN7., Mx M Y.. _ CI VI~PLA«A EB~ROW' .Y^nm = w~..w ~... ..- COR-ORATION GRANT DEED FOR A VALWeI[ LONEIDERAf1ON, rsapr 01 wM[a b an.ey wf:rowl.Op.E. PILGRIMS INVESTMENT CORPOMT[ON, PILGRIMS SUPPLY, SNC. and TIMBERLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. . mrpx111on orrwEle uNw uw Im el mn Sur. ei Cel ifornie ~ 0^'1 x"~' GRANT la NORDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Cali[oznla corporation w n.l wee.ur m m. cNY of Ceunry of Een ee rnerd Sno . Suu el GYIan•, elYribO m The Neat one-halt o[ the Eaet one-half o[ Lot 1, Block 13, Cucamonga Nomeeteetl Auoefation Lenda, a per map cecortled Sn Book 6, page d6 of Mnpe, Sn the oEtite of the County Recorder of said County. E%ccvT the [ef znm the Soutq 100 toes pole- July I5,_ 198b cou yn or;y v u~[/,%'tLJ<'/N C I N u ~.oni. Mdn ntt.~v ~n rw eu:.. wnmM. mr~ ... u w n+ w.e.......w.. ... __..__.._r~ws+YY PILGR IVE THE 'T Cf,pPOiU]'ION BY: C~ PILCRf MS PPLY, C. j'IN?TE?/,'.A4n~M/)N a/T$IlCT10N-, INS. _.._ Br /-lL~$T-~~-` ~ y~wGrm er -s.~r'«'i.r _ _. - __e.ewN /~-. ana m Y..M«_ ....... '. _._."__-- (9F/r'~ ,1`j~ puxu~i utiD[n~ N.eP+m own w.aa+Ha+.:,eN ww. ww uY~: V'.%``~ M':" "~.„`. n PNe+n,onM M1 wM n4NwA MW M IY q`Mw V • ~`~tl. ii N n1YY IN 111 rat ~M1 ~ ~N~M ~`l ~~-~M ILOTAx STATEMENTS AS DIAE<TED AxOVE w•r. nn:.w ~.,~u r~ ~I.o Iba]I I`. .~ .. RECOR0:0 IN OFFlCIA RECORDS ~uL Ee roes pT E:9oAM SWi BEANAROINO COUNTY, CAUf. i G ~ ` !{ I.; 1F lj9P ' Y/• p1 'r r.$ig N t Fr ~~ ). C, / A ~111.w L4npYY 1 pry wlmrrw XUt lSCI.%'ft/rr^'~~~ M (:~t~-~~.;90/.- "'11"`J~~`+!~v! /GlLPR[J~. ~l'<S ~N.+~M.N..1w.N.aN N. w ..a.Y..l Mw.NtiwnwN Nn MM rY YYNY.nF.~NNNYI M.a.w..1..IWyy W MMMYU+.N Y . 11.aYNai. YeMnl.Yb4.Y/. w.Nlw.w.wa~+~.Y..f N.IwYp/Y~e hl _ MAU~aanNNYlM~wwMYwrXw~W NY ~. ~~ p~l«~~~ UMW FM.~.iwaWYn..Nwaw.N,. ~1.~ ~ tl• 1nd.uwNnwNNw.a ~ ^+.. a~°+emi.~. '~~ ]LL~ J /~ 1N 0~Y l0 RI I HN ...Ya./~luac'7 ~i ~nR.a/ oY... / ~// nN1...N,.r ww ~rnnwwnga~r. ~ j C cpr«rrw .vN4 ~'jE/YfI.L'/rJ~._.iY i5t~'r.~l3g (.. a _JN G y. 151 lJEG. _ _.__.__.__. w..»,M w.,w..a. Naw'.w. NYN w .YMN.avaNNYM.._~ue l_.C.: CCC,pe~.. ___._ ,,, ______.. __ _____. _ ._..w~..w..w.~... w.v...N ~...~.. b.YI WY.M.NYiel NMMT.ww~n..nM.IMMnFwIrv+NnIM ~.. _... _.. .. .. MYYa W_..... _Metiwt.YMMtl ..._. M sFM Xw'w.Y.l aY N .Y lNl W s..niY~.YNYM~wY .vwY ~- ~4N M.. F'Nw N.1MMM/ V tirI V M.i. ^I't l~IOa /• lXI0El1 k..:...r N..c c.,.ar. wrrN.unnw YN+Naw ~-,Y wr~wNNY°u'm.Nrv C\ _ /~ Y. mr m m . mr ~w+u. .7~L?000 'r•A..itiJ ... mr... N.ww..wYw // N.ty i. MpRi{E'f DATA N0.2 _..T..~- .. ~ ..-.. ~.. ~ _~,4.~_in __ - •r: --- ~e ~ t. I View of Sale Taken oa ApL'i124, 1987 (a:ve) a i9' o ~ ^ ]2 ' t h. l c ~ S P ? i JJ '' ~ a `r ~ ` ~6 10~~~a r~CL I Ji• ~ - ~ ~ -J ~ 1 ~ V 1 N _ ~ ~~ F y I I Po, * „ I ~ .. P ( ~~ )/.f.~ IS ~ ~ , I ; ~ , ~Y „~ ~ x ~ ]] ~ ~ p\ PE o [ ~ J J6 y I Pc. Lot ~ , 661 ' ~- I X P ~0 ~' ": ~ T ..,._ ~ '~ z r JIJ P1 ~~~ ~ BU 8 CHA Po. 1 n: ~ .fav .Jr ~ ~ ~~ _ .. (] Y I e( ]: ~ P] I ~ 6 Fb Y 4 ^ 6}2 C l ~ ... ~6]IC I n JO. /q ~ rI'a; ' • v ..• V ^~ 1v.e~ irroe MIl70N~- n• i YI q ~ I' L! rt i"~ MARKET DATA N0.2 DATE OF DEED. Apri] 15,1986 ASSE5SOR5 PARCEL NO. 202-111 Sl and 62 LOCATION: Approrimately 208 feet east of Amethyst Street on the south side of 19th Street is the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California LEGAL DESCRII''IYON: Please see the attached Grand Deed LAND ARF 4: 6.48 acres; 282,269 square feet ZONE Zoning. L -Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre Use at Sale UTILITZFFS: Vacant land Water: Available Electricity. Available Gas: Available Telephone Available TOPOGRAPHY: Level, draining north to south ACCESS: Good, fronts to 19th Street IlYII'ROVEMENTS: None DTi /YlDTT1+/+ n ~ m ~. .u... ~. W...u u...... ~.y,u , J ur/0.LLLlCll~iY V. OU•VJUUYJ GRANTOR: Pedersen, Anderson, Anderson GRANTEE: Hill-R'illiams Development Corporation PURCHASE PRICE: $307,530.00; $1.09 per squaze foot TEEL175: Cash VERIFICATION: Grantee 04 A7-3li N ..m..Yr ...,,.~rRe .. aL..N ~-51~. r ._...,Y_..... ^•w NIII-VI11 WR Mwlolwen[ Corp. ~r SSW S.r,1• AY Gnron Rd. 1711 ~.L na1., a ttew ABED IN 0~ A~ADS 7s ee6 Al 40°w BEAAAADINO COIINTYr CAllf. 86-096645 eeece e,ovR nfr ufa .q wmsvs 11~ r _ r ~_ w 1 DwOwMarY f.n.b. 4a 1776.75 _ IM .N. N .r,~n, ,:.:.,r, _ r ee ebove ~ • g ~, w IA ,.4. ti .... / r~~.~ ~ ~awrwry sr~ r fYr N .R4 w..:L J [nL evden4oed Iar.n J wrbr r w rw.r r ti r 65066 O l nw.rhoN ure 41 N .. .. .. E..w \. Teo Pd.r b egm u_m Gr811t Deed 707-111-AIL 61 L~ • M.v aa~ua,.. sw~~ 10e A VALVA42 CDt1510GAT10N, ~M N N.i .brit dw4lpl ESIIIER tLDlA6Ex, • rrr led OYen Yd DMLENE V7U6Y, • vrrled wan Rnd D. E. ANDERSeN and eARGDERITE E. ANDERSDN~ Nuebend Yd Ylfe bril GMM161 w NILL-V{LI SA16 DE321,OPNENT CORP. • Glf [ornfe co. porecfon dia 1.1..'.R M.nAN nJ prePenl .n Je <1[y at 4neno Cueuonle [.wiFN 6Y ee[ne[d1M .wu N('i4.w: Par cal. Land of Per<el Nep Vo, b7c F, Y per pLr recorded fe IooL A6 Page hl Of Percel Wpe. Records of Sen eenurdin0 Cwmq, G11[Ornb. pa„1_ F<ArWrv 12. 19..,.______ I~R sr.rtacusacu d Je_.rY i!. 19C6 ReY~Y ra Rr7EUy au a n.r ~ enra r ~ -~ _ ~--• •••-~-~y 1 f ~ ~ I ' ~~.rvL .. . _ __.. _ o.... . _ ~7 ~.J 1 L iL~ '.: ~ , i ~s-~-ss~s ,f ®~o bi.l{ d f~/{jy(/ 111191LSOiA GVrtY y G9oab9e ~w j ~'~~ ]SN w~ 4p`viNYrnvVbrlM~~re Peva~l eeaeb YorYMr `~ IS.Yb.lti vtaeabti, • .fvVetre~: IOI11OfMi M4 01. e1Ar l j OM1VVbel Ore.brya~rv Wre Ia~Y.00biY v t v rev tib leuasnroeae~.n•brw~a t ( ~d(j~Y. b( 4ybw/,W.Yrrr +mu nr snu ur Mtcu Cuuet': of Prnn{LrgS m. Vavaber )p~ 19fl5, Lrlorv a tb« wrier>lRUrei < Notary Pvbl lc L: ar.J •nr •ald Slnre: pernoual lv, app¢a red Ifarr.... r r (pr~vr~i r., ~_ nl ]ilVll a. [orV X11 ~,~ ~:`w:: t0 4) Prreov vhne.r user eubu rt bed Ito the leptrr Irutruernt rendp ~ for v b.n nbr en«ruteJ the nae.. • YnarledFeJ Jl:v .~ m wr.d and oll lr ral aaal Scn P bl rr MARKET DATA N0.3 ~ View of Sale Taken on April 24,1987 20, 75 26 ~_ .> ;~. Ji (20rn 5T1 qy ENUE., '. ~r•W P[r ~ ~ _ n... i,..n ~7:~i1 ~ W I sr.c is 9~ya ~ ~i ~ ~Ad p ~ a :,.. III M 0 16 ~' J ~ 1 i I J 7n'~ i 1 rog I CD C~ ,. a. ]91 }B .MC WI =I I alve -sracETl # I _ o[M •l b~nfWYGD1 I MARKET DATA N0.3 DATE OF DEED: Ocfnber 28,1985 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 202191.15 LOCATION: Approximately 250 feet south of Highland Avenue on Haven Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Please see the attached Grand Deed LAND AREA: 2.55 acres; 111,078 squaze feet ZONE Zoning: Use at Sale: LTITLITIFS: Water. IIectricity: Gas: Telephone: TOPOGRAPHY: ACCESS: Ti1IPROVEMENTS: RF.CORDT'n1f: T14TA• GRAIV'TOR;: GRANTEE; PLRCHASE PRICE: TERMS: VERIFICATION: L -Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre Vacant land Available Available Available Available Level, draining north to south Good, frontage on Haven Avenue None , , wuu~vu~~•V. VJ'LIJ140 EJL Development Corporation C.T.K., Inc., a California Corporation $13.1,000.00; $1.22 per squaze foot Cash Grantee, Carl Robbirs 04-A7-Ja wy.r rrnYrwl fbllrlrs n '.hrYTCOWr",r~L A r~iwF ~. i~~u~ A.wr.h~ war ~rc.r.R. me. ~--~ uu s. en. a.psr ~ 9Wb u 01.11Q19 far, plif. 13793 rL Adnl 01x1 RMtn J 1111. orrr R. M7103-1 r.... I:.. 150931 AEL'O~D N OtT1CIAL RECORDS NoV 4 uses AT 8 ~Mt SRN BFANARDOp COIMtTr GLIF. wet .r0.. mn Lme rw Ilf[OIIOrIrY u.e Corporation Grant Deed n hMNrw+ a.1... Oxl 6. ~~ u.w1.. w w 1.....1939..._..........,......_---...-"-'_.... w i. 0 AwA w W N nA. N N Y.nr w NTe1 .carer./, ca w Q ~v .: W N Nw Yw 0e r.M J Yw. w wnJrwrw rrrinlnl ene.n M W li.f N w4. The I..d. I.r4 w rw1T M bM 4 1'09 A VAWA91i ~IOOIATIO'1. rri11 N dkl M be11 - , N.rl, lT4 ONfk{~t OiyeeWm • ~wYiw wriwl rir i 4n N W S4r M p1116m1Y bit 09MTIy r C.S.R. IDc., 10115mL oQ9QY.1m ie lrln'W ~FrY.,:rl Irgr.lT~ W o>tim¢aY4d Y[M r+T N !a imud4b . rrrr M GOI4rw: Af 9Y1 IlA4 ~OItOr1a /1'OOm 106'OJ NO MR A 9MR relD7r OrN ORmr b. 1995 9rAn arerwsw ~ wunror la Io9vN OeNh_.~ON__rrr _4cto911_I. ~S Ir4.h. NwYrYFY rrrrYNSFw.rrY4..rrr.r iLTL . /r Vr Yw: • q f /.M Y h w N rrY.1 rr~T MsYYN..YI CC..i_Iiw:Y.IY .._._. _. ..... ~. ... .... _.tiYFFwnF+Y~ W.wYhwNr.l.YhYMrhYY __ IM IIOr.A WLpI Yf.w MrrrrNw~rr rwww/•YMww O1 I rM/Ih..YhY~F./rhwhlrrruY~r wYrr. r r N w:w w rrrl h r•w i:rrw. w .rrrr Nr.w~wN:wwwAw.rYwrlfrY:rwr rw.~rw~.rNw:ArrwN.wrrr+. errlaAL UAL r.+r~r.irwrrw. ® RLRLn nrcurtnrr A .R IJ• t PAIL TAq OATOIlMT11O NM MARY 0. rMIgIYO OYY.: 11 MO PA.LT rl r1OfY, YML Up1r.7C0 Arri'R 0ka91w M • .. 4^. ,.. .,, -r- ----~- r -. ` 85-273748 fOlz7if30~ EOlmT •A• tf•r prtlw •f bt• ] W f tf eY frMltttb• ievtt I••r u••eLtlee HM]K•lr fte Wt nrNN A f•tL IL tf Mtp, fN• I7, et<orb el rte Cary. tt w rl•rrwntN rrlNK •l IN NtrNtr Cw[7, titer .f Glibnit, Mrr1Mf r btlwt , tW t•Klw •f uN bb) •tl t llht rttMrlf tl • Ilr Mart beta !• •t•K tf• N• N' wit N Wt• rtury rrtltw L tN wnrlr 1!w •l [M OtKYrt 1/1 N NKb• U, 7M•Atf 1 NKY, Ntrt 7 wr, i•e NraNlr NN tN IYSiHr, Wn rKY C ll' U' we YO.IS Mt tlw uN weKly fir hw tlr w•ttwt rrwr •t tM wnWt 1/1 •t <M rrmut 1/t of YN NKtr )), 6rftltt Wnfw tot f•Klr <aergtl N tN Gry tf to NwNlw, r Mf rrlwu tN fN1t1<, y NN rrNN IIr7 11, 1ftA !• bt SU], lyt lx, oetw.l fN•rt•, Nrr1w r auw.t tttlrl' t[ tM i•NrwKtr •f tM tat llr •f tm• Aww, W fNt vNt, tN tM •Net IIr tf tlttLN MteN, ]] b•t ttM w<Y d emur ltrt H•••• ••ttl, Wf W NN wit llw •( ttw• Aww, ff0.73 fret eMw wte ZZ bte{ tort rrtt r1 RLL41 N tM u4 wK uw N Nwt AKtw, ff0.73 Mt b • pt•[ N tM wt0 llr rf tltA1W aNer, urr mt Wq NY •wtt Ilr •f tlttLtl A~teet, 33 Mt N tM Abt tf tttlr37. 11r tsegtt~ eM rKt 1N frt tf iM ttwt MNrItN NKtl a prt7N tt [t• trN N NllbnA br hwwl prptu y NN KcoNN ARLl f, IfN, u 7retrrt b. t1.Otl M1, O/ft<bl Narb. ].' iglae ~\ MARKET DATA N0.4 lsi G View of Sale Taken oa Apri124, 1987 P,l>,~ J ~ __ . ... --- ALDER- 5 .. ~ \ .n. .tit w J N /•~TT1Tr~ ~ i 1 \t 1'.. f~i J ~a ~L~ti YG .... < G O • • It JJ Ev r ~' O t W i tai 2 ~ .... ~ 4! a• < o O 4 O t J G ~- ~ a. .: iL FRADO : tool ~i ~~ For BLK i ~ ~G/ O O C P1].C ttM1 tIDK Yh PPOELtth YIX bIARKET DATA N0.4 DATE OF DEED: Ju]y 24,1985 ASSESSORS PARCII. NOt 20&921-03 and 04 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Please see the attached Grand Deed LAND AREA: 5.50 acres; 239,550 square feet ZONE Zoning. L -Low Residential, 2-4 density units per acre Use at Sale: ITiE iJTYI Vacant land . .S: Water. Available IIectricity. Available Oas: Available Telephone: Available TOPOGRAPHY: Very sloping from hill at northeast to down to the southwest portion of the property ACCESS: Cood, fraata to Vineyard Avenue RYIPROVEMENIS: None REUORDING DATA: GRAIr"fOR: GRANTEE: PURCHASE PRICE: TERi11S: VERTFICATION: August 8,1985, Document No. 85-191844 Evangelical Church Schultz, Wallace $215,000.00; $0.90 per square foot Cash Grantee 04 8 i ,:11 ~tlt921~ u•Iww A ~ M IfF1CIAl AEfOApS Auc a lees Ai • ~K """"^'"""° WI IawlAes»o carder cAUf. trMY+~~ l., A-MrvMw _.r ._:..~ ~: ~.:r p~~~p,9~ erwr err rrw r.. r wrwrn w aLy_lA'21P1y Ylrritt ~ CMrletp A. Corporsdon Grant Deed .2.1 ~.-,2,.~2 a uosalcno nueur.. aea.Apr.r OOGi'YCRYY ttAMNtt TAt.t~ y p -...A. r.r. ~ p~.......rr.. ^ r~Ya r IrAI ..L. t. r.\..11.~ ~ .wL~. w..wr ~ r~ d LL. N tl~ DACISU sourlelcsl msrullcE a n1E nAMEEUCU tDYElY1ls1 tlAaG1 a A1EeiCA, A cxl-aru co9-oarlrla Q !~ ,~ lAA ~/1 Ln Q Rr . Yel..\Ir Cu.Hrurb.. J. r.rri pl .1 .\irA it Mrrrbr .rAna.l. d. rd. A.rr6. LIIAnTMr T, Y. M. SpIlM1.T2 NO CrrsAl017E ~. SCNULTI, nY5BAN0 NIJ rlfE. AS CpIRa1Tt -9aERTt .a Jw rJ r•r•..! rw..l p dr Gxue..l .... SNI 9EMU9LIrJ ~ Srr .l GbA.mu, drrri42 r Id...: t ~ IM f~n Mr stDSntudtl fn Amk 21. hpYlgtM MtYt ~n tM Oyf d tY Canty IrcorWr of NId Canty, NstrlEed a fellaa: ~eglnnllp tt the Swtlslnt Corerr M ssld Lot 9, tMnte Ibrtn alaq the YLLL line of uid lct 9, a alttance o< 326.21 feet; Hence Eest penile) rIN the Sang Ilne of sell lot 9, a dlttance o! 733.99 feet, yore M less, to the East Ilse of the Wst aK-Mi1 of said Lot 9; Hence Swtn clap the East Ilse o/ tM Yest aw-Mlf of Bald Lot 9 to Lne South Itne of NId lnt 9; tnence Pest done the south Ilrr M oil rM o .. gyn.... .. •. _, py ,. ~..11l6J, 2~tYft Inc Decllic Soutnreft tonferwKt of tM M i-YAS71~fR-t~ort~ or'tlrtef"_..- sfCle 6. rl .i°.~(d(t/MvyiGK... .. STAY[ Or ULIro{My. !_ /',>/1 COUNTY o``r 4t /fAfM1T /r ~ {S !t Id M. Ulfen fc/ l./ L%jA1. `.en..r l+. p. ~/r/AY ZV ~f.,1T.,\.i....r4N.rW.r\.MW tiYYYWI. ~1A tup. YrwWl Mpnr,. -r. /V~wnr~ rrrA+rr__. riwYrtrl/1.CL_2Y.....Q_iJer. `Yr.Y.ebb.M_~ ` •O.rf r1. yy .rwAwaMY IM~tiI rw.MrrY \. w r.....M r•Rrwl w-T ~ijrir r ~r~Y`..r.w.r rr...r5 ..2 ..r..i.+c.e r .. ru w.n Iri'.r. • r..r"r +~ r~ra rw~ r r r ..\ Tirr.r. rrs w ..W 1...~r ...r., r'r \r MlTrpf v rr W rrl ~ ~sr JaeE9 L All ~ r~r~ii ~ir~. ~r n t//_~/ii//~ ... _. 1.~.. ~i.s... ur n.n 7.~, r~r .. ..c. r,, en ra. +ewc .~. .. .. .. ADDENDA C SUBJECC PftOPE[tTY GRAN'C DEEDS 04fi7 9?1 ~~~~5 Iic;,j TITLE INSI'RANCE COMPANY ACCORDING ALQOtfTtO BT ~~~t~ 6 ~ w'~tRes~ ~ and roan neotded Yf l tot ~ 1:f:11111Yr ~Re Rt• AN[fl i. {ANfrI[Z eN~~ JOfL ININ[ D. tANCN[: '' 991s rIRDN nw. _ - w-vi~grS RANCNn fUC rJ10NLA, CA VP G ~~ ~ !~ I 'N pOCtA9tIlIT ally TR AM9 PYR TAA Tff C~ ~/ ,f u .~i. 5t' 9~r _7~~~ DnD oP ADNltlsrutoR JdV-Gf5 is OORCNICA TIIAYAGLI A, Y AdNlnfetn for e[ the Lbte of lLTCP G. TMVIIGLIA. •Ra lLTLA TMVAGLI A. aka KTS tMVAGALIA, dm•sM, ~ fn cone lda [•tf en o[ {99,000.00 ew n, rece lpt of rnlen 1. Mrely ! acknerled qed, doea Aereny grant and convey to ANOCL G. SAIICRBi ~ and JOSCPtlINC 0. BMCBEZ, DueD•nd and rlfq all righ t, title, j Incere rt and etUH OL Mid PETER 0. TRAVAGW A, •k• rtTBA ' iAAVAGL2A, aka Ptt[ TAAt'AGALiA. deco wd, •t eh. tiee of O(a Outn, and •LO •11 rigor. tltla and lnten•t that the ea ute Nay Dave aubugwntly ecqu Sred Dy openelon of 1•r, of of nerri Y, In ana to [ne n•1 property In the Clty Ot Cucuo:r/s, County of tan ' Bernardino, 9ta to o[ Cali[ornla, de wrlDed a Collors: '. An undivided oneyuart•r Snterut Sn erW to RMI pr operey located •t tH9 MNN•a Av., Cuu Ynqa, Cal ife[via, dwetlbed ••: t~om, \C Loc t of Tract 5955 a• •norn on • up of the Torn of Neet ~, Luca eoteq•, a recorded in Book ]f of Napa, page itAC190d. Record. of Ean Be [na rd Sno County, Calif ornl•, LYCCPTf NG TNBRCrRON the Na•terly 1.00 toot the vot An undivided oY-quarb[ lnterut Sr. and to Aul property located ', ai 10091 b!v Sl., Cuueonga, Glitornl a, descrlDed ae< Loc• 1 and ] of Block 17, according to tn. N•p of the Turn of Neat clcaeonga, County of San Bernardino, Calitorn u, •. per wp recorded in Book 1J of Naps, pages 1 and 7, Aeco r0• of u!d county. TnL deed ). ode pun u•nt to the Order Contlt Nlnq S•)e of Pe ai Pioptrty Yde In P[onaYe Case No. !N .6J 0, Superior Court of ia~n Be rr~rdino County, State of Glifornfb enb red onJwuarv r•neovsly n.r.r ltn in the o[1 )ce •of LM county bcerde ryet Aaid county, to rn icn raterence is Oe nDy Nade. IN NITNEBB NBLABOr, tale 1M t[uY AC la eYKYted th i. Zah i day of Janu•r~• _, 19 t! j l Rll L A, n . racor ' o[ the 6ata to o[ lLSLA G. TMVA :LI A, aR• lETLF TMVAGLIA, aka PBTE raavACU.tA, a«e•aee srkrt Dr cALIroRN u courry ar GNANGE on J•np e' i1 S, Detr~n ae, Mt unde nlgr..e. ~~ !; ' . n Fu: I ••.••` .n and :o: rue 5:: .. ~.., .r. {.it~k, ~ ° rA •[• ' MN011 CF TFA. AG L1!.. Aou+n~''•'~ .r. rffM~~ R-• Zi~Z +: r.r . iOr ~. v'v ae t.. .. .~ t,.. i.. \~ i rr,r..a •at utacto ry eviAe ~ tc t. a .r~~Lw-~r.rt rs M noo vnwe aut to euDrc'SDrd~to ~.. tn. rttnle lYtn Brent and acknovieaged to Na that M aYerutb cne caw. NIT9Ii995 ry haoe and oftte lei Yal. l . l• , ~. d.r N. l•.. w ~• L TICOP. TITI[ INSUFM:CL CAMPAN~ +wkr eatOffpfO Nwll TO 1 i~..'; :IiIE IRSt'caNCE COMPARE i B~ N ifL1~l I~MGS 'wR eey~p~rA~T•a~rEfs~tteEy iuit~ YNYI It ~~. ~~ furl Tar R4TEMN1f lO~. mal-ew~a vu~~ rro aa~c~ ~ !~~ TIEf a d" r..+`s~N.9•/e~`rr/~fr.r.rr•fw~.s r r ---~G'... f~."~c~ GY- -/b ^ QURCWM DEED 6MS'-Af5'/5 ro• • vwLUYlf MNf10EMTfON, neaol el .nren . Nq aYno.'~lffa. JENNIC T. IIIMALOI !]'1 b•e :•eN NEN15E. nELEAtf M1O fMtVEA tEnl01.W N p0fl~1Q SAAVIIG{.tA y a. ti r=p.r . ev Gn .f Ncawnge ry ONm. el can Mrnardlno sun N rrasw, •er.f . Rll Oer right, tltla and interut in •nd !o M•1 property located IVIO) •t 8915 Puon• Rh., R~cuong•, Celiforni•, deetriMd •e: Lot 1 of 7uct 5955 as •born on • N•p of cbe Torn o[ Meet Cluwnga, as iaco[ded In loon Not Napa, pqa !! , Racorda oL San eenurdifw Countyr Cal llornU, - 6rCNRING TNCAEIAON the Neaterly LOO Loot CMiaol All her rlght, title and Snbreat Sn and to Aeel property lac•tad •t 10091 N•ln St., l'uca NOngar uu xxurn Le, a•acrloaa of Lot• 1 and ] of Blork i], according to Lbe Nap o[ the Torn aL Nut Cuuaonga, County of Dan Mrn•rdlno, Cal horn x•, •f pr aap r•co[ded !n loow 3J of Napa, p•q•a 3 and 2, Aacotda of uld county o.fr _p!c~nbt.r .,311.1411 _._ ' nm o. u.rw.» Aln svfrL ~ moron __._ ~__: w_n..-.~. .n~. F ITT~vi __.__ ..~.+. r.... r.,...... ~.... ~. ~n .~.... w .~. r... ~......~..•..•. r w ~.,~~... r~rw a ~.. ~..,......++ l „ I n JWIC T. C)MAL^i LWI f .. W,) . ~ aNln fraa Yrpf ial1. l'alir ~VlL' w:..ee~•riw r.: ~-. .....,. r.~rf~frN r . o,.e w 1... r L..n r 1 TICOR 1171E INSURANCE COMPANI wPln R!L'Da BEn YMl TO TICGR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY rAn T•r tTanraXn To. L61o1-IN~.T f91M@ml r/o ~_ mlRYrMRr lllY~~ TaY a -e~.~rrr~.,r.rwr.rr w qurtcuuY D![d ,7o9-ACS- /S 1 [~~ iOP A VAl': reLE EpgIpEPATIdi, r~ M .w. P P.r .t,u4aaPl. (y~ RER TMVAGLIA 1 \~l m ee I,/av ItEYtrE. RELEI3E ,WO [OIIEVER QIIIlCLA1M Y t V pQIL9ICR TMVaGL:A f h h r ti .aP.~r X n+ cnr of C13c•YOngn C.,,,n ., Ran Bernard Sno • E"Y °i c"ilerni • •1P~ ,~-I All Lla tigEt, tltlc •nd 1nNr••t Sn and to Re•1 ProPe[ty located tkj et BBIS B•wna Ave., Cucamonga, C•I l[o[nia, dncriDeE u: I Lot 1 of Tr•et 5955 •• aNavn on • up of tM town et MqC Cuu conga, a recorded Sn Yoak 7~ of Yapa, page E0 ~ Neorda et Ssn Mrnardino Couocy, C~LLOrn1•. { t LECLPTI9Ri tYRRLPROY tna Marce.•ly 3.00 foot t~Ynof A31 tie rlgac, title and lnt•rest in and to bal p[opatYy located ac 30091 M•ln Sc., Cacuo[pa, California, ReacriWd •u IAta 1 and 7 of ilocR ii, •ecording to tna Y•p of tM Torn of ruC t]luawn0•, County e! Ran Mrdrdino, Glitornla. •a Pr Yap recorYed In Raok I9 of Yap•. p•gea 3 aYG L beorda e[ uld county .nyyY~waYAWI V... 6~YIYILt .Qaal•L I P Ll L [eAll. :. .'1l I. B[h T:J,V,IGLIA irAr.~~~.. Ptir~~rre~~r ~~ e r r~.- .... r~aa.~ rw•r+r r .~. qw~. •-.. ~,..,.,. ~r ~e.~~... 819 ~ lflpll ~S wrt as yr~~s~Rr~• ry ~`.' ~fi~rMr~Mi~IL~AM~•~e~w's• + W ~ AL Taet'le'..lt .B .' '+~+-j-' p ~.. . ra. c aV1lt41 .. ..~~s:, _ ..,_ r a.., w. /.... N.. Cav, N.. M'011 TITLE INSUEV.NGk (i,ANYANf t rMSN I4CONp{a NAIL N, jS 1~R T1TlE INSURANCE CpMPA1Tq Mart rra srARrENEe ro: /mB~alMy 111N0~1 TM a w i+~•--• ~ -a,aa.rf.a.raarr.rrrrrtir.ar ew . cwr ~ weraur.r.rw a.rr r ~_ 1 gYRCWM elan ak'9 -OIF$-.CS ~~ FON A vAlllaaLf rnlEppEMTION, rrk,1 el MIN Y a.rf r,r.l.ea.e. OIIILNICY TBAVAQ.U ~J fa ea r+,:,y AfYItE, NllEAlr Mtn fa1NER OlI1lCLAW b ABGBT. G. 9Al~l And \~ 70SBPBINI O. /ANCCn, 4aWnA and v1A, v ~ 4. nY aewn i, w On eE Ncaebnga nanly el SiEI BIIPL[d1G0 fw M fYln,^ f„orE r All IILa rlget, tltle aad lnta[eat 1n and co 4Q property located •t ~ //eS 4aN]M ]lea., Cuuaonga, Cal i[ornla, deter lAaG aa: ~O Lot 1 0[ Traet )955 M ahovn on • raD of the Torn o[ Meat Cucuanga, ae racordad 1n Book p o[ Maps, page it , Records of San Bernard Sno County, G1lfornL, StI YYCBPTING TNEABtRON the Naf btly 1.00 foot tM[act A31 nia rlgtt, [tile aM Sntereat in and to 4a1 property ]oubd at 100.1 Me In /C., CU.^uonge, Cal lfornle, deacY lDad u: Lots 1 and ] of BlOCk 11, •LCOrdl nn •n •L. r. ..a - ~_~~ 1 uucuonga. County o[ ben Be[mrdino. Cal ilornla, a par rap facerdad In Book 11 0€ Nape, pages 1 aM ], Bamrda of Mid County Gr January ]1, Ip5 aunooaaarr {. oaa,n v___pra-.,y ~_.. E.m .ry_.li 196( _.____._ Mr ~ w, u.rval, r'YPIt r •+s ~ r,• r• arar. r r.. r frr. ~.. r rr rr,,,.. rre a r r frw r r..r swrrrf a r r raver r r~rar a~ w vrvaa• r ..^., sY ., . Y , .'1.: . B~OFB w ~i~1111 ~COADS rue a Ives a ~ee earr ~~a/~ /~/ ff Bf~t. S gr9f)PA,alys/ Dunanlel Tuvaglla V •nor r ~ a arm ~~ Bl aar~l ~41K~ a \ . ~ y _ _ • ~t W1 W ~r p ar !b h. •tlla•rl lrY flrt a1• [~~., hllfw~l. Or. ld._ . . ~~. w _ io-v.:= _ I.w 1b- - - f® ~i O~IIlR ll/ i(1 fa[ ra~Dr1 vnl eor.rr D[c~.3r w/A. r 1f~r~ 41[ N40 r~ ~ W Z g111LL fll~ra V Mai. 6wry, 411! .Y t~ANT ~~~~ fa ~ vuwwf cOraolunarl pV r.Nd i. F.+..a...~+na mi n.•fau . wrewr Nl~u fal IY W 1 v 0 .w rrti cawrr.W~~::r ~ i ~tM~dru : ~:irl~~:i. rUll: i~'n l~irrw'l: i frh~uaro •.harfine rl~ll4~ 1°~ i.rR..e.ale .. •lllerrl... eWC. N wJ ~r w ti~ Cw.F d W •avrflw Siw r CMSrr, rvi.1 t bu) W ~, flwY ll, Wa Csq•, u pr p rwwW b •eel U, •Yr 1 et IYf., lwar~r •t •rlf fAt). ia1LT f0: fwwd lu[.llwt Grr.l W ••al.l ta.. fm [M fl.c.l Tv ITi6i ). Cwa..u, <slluaw, rwtrlctlw, nrrwtlw, tl{hu, r4hu e/ w~ W u.mt• ee. of rwm~. CVwd ~W4_L~_IfM r.. ~.reoal.. _ r ... - ~e..r.. zl~tsu < ~C ~ O II~y _ _ _ a~y_ r r . i, _ --''~~qq ~.yyy~++.~yy~ ^i , r-a rd~ ~-.._..~..~~ ........~.. a ~a.+ ar+. ~. nll~l ...l --_JOPi'. r•c iW rural. . r,.ltewr. ... t. I ' -- ~f J 1 ~ ~, ~+ _ ~:~ _.....r.._...._ i „°~ y~ li! ~_ ~ ~ iva nrrl rwa _ _ -~_ r.u_.___. __~.___ = - ~C.LL~. A bs{tr • _ _~___._.. _._ _ . ~ . _ _ ..__ .. ~rTnr~Y ______.._ _ 1W~ ~: _ ~~ ~~ . mow.-Seri4y~ __ .._ _ it IfxW i.nvl _ W..: ~ IA! S C! 6r n ! lir lremiL b G. !I tln fir. !I ryY 4! _Iwlr u nn Hotl ,: ~ b ~.! v .. ~~.. P,... l E _„ ,..-. -. . r, a . ~1, -..._, . .,. . .....:. . a_ . , o., > ": _ .+a~ nee-- ..,... fr.^. _ ',~y _nu•.. l.rr~.n..i •:5 .S !!~~ ~~~_h..'lY~._. 4 y~ L)L 9 ' ~ nr_~ __ _ ~ru ~~ ADDENDA D PARTIAL LLSI' OF PERSONS CONTACTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Jchn Murtin -Traffic Blaine Frandsen -Engineering Planning2oning Department Chamber of Commerce Damar Corporation Data Qvick Service Steven Danie]s Realty San Bernardino County Recorders Office Chicago Title Company Service Fidelity Federa] Title Company Service Stanton Nurseries Atchinson Topeka and Santa Fe Rai]oad Neil Leverton, CheiC nispatcher Rancho Cucamonga, California Los Angeles, California Los Angeles, California Rancho Cucamonga, California San Bernardino, California San Bernazdino, California Redlands, California Chino, California San Bernardino, California 04F7 '2] ADDENDAE QIIALIFICATIDNS Michael S. Murphy is an appraiser associated with J. William Murphy and Associates, Consulting Appraisers, afirm engaged in the practice of real property appraising, as well as appraisal of certain associated personal properties and dairy herds. Emphasis is placed upon the appraising of both rural and urban properties including commercial, industrial and special purpose properties in the urban area. A summary oC qualifications is as follows: Percnnal Resident of Southern California since 1954; resident in Chino area since 1958. F.d ~ motion Completed twelve years of school in Chino, California, graduating with honors from Chino High School in January, 1972. Completed five years of training for the ministry in Brooklyn, New York from 1972-1977 Have completed courses sponsored by: 1. Americas Institute of Real Estate Appraisers a) Rural Valuation -Davis, California b) Valuation Procedures -Austin, Texas c) Valuation Principles -Austin, Texas d) Pmfessiona] Standards and Code oCEthics -San Diego, California ~. .iwerican oocrety of r'arm Managers and Rural Appraisers a) Rural Appraisal -Fresno, California 3. Marshall and Swift a) Commercial Valuation - Newpon Beach, California b) Reside¢tia] Valuation -Newport Beach, California 4. Lumbleau Beal Estate Schools -West Covina, Califon~ia Alembershios and Affiliatipnq Candidate: <imn.;, _. ?netaute of Hen] i5ta ie Appriasers 0.1-A7-.',CI .. . Community Service Co-chairman Tor City of Hope, Dairy Division, Chino Chapter - 1981 to Present Professional F.yp nC ,PncQ Have engaged in farm, ranch, dairy, land, cattle, commercial and industrial appraisals through the states of California, New Merico, Texas and Arkansas since 1980. Licensed real estate agent (State of California) with the Bill Murphy Company, Chino, California -License No. 008189923. Fee appraiser associated with J. William Murphy and Associates, Consulting Appraisers, since 1980. Compjpt d nnraisa-ls Cnr (among otherel Government Agencies: State of California • Cal Trans U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles, California City of Grand Terrace, California City of Lake Elsinore, California City of Rancho Cucamonga, California City of Hemet, California San Bernardino County, California Riverside Coutty, California Chino Basi¢ Rater Conservation District Attorneys: Maroney, Demchuk, Brandt and Krueger upland, California Anderson, Taves and Reever Cpland, California Rutan Tucker Newport Beach, California 04~N;~3'S7 FOOTFiiLL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;:,~ , - Por>, i;:,:':. ~~J~~ ' _ ; ;?~;i.y JUNE 16, 1987 CITY OF -_-c-=. ; J, / l 3ANCH0 CUGAMONGA _. Ji r , ,~; ~.~ _ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN SUMMARY The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a community committed to excellence. The City's development and design review process places heavy emphasis on quality, long term viability, and support of community goals in all development projects. WHAT IS THIS PLAN ABOUT ? Foothill Boulevard is the most signifcant comnvr- cial corridor in the Cin~. Bstablished as a major east/west commercial thoroughfare, the condor is an important p;u-; of the developing regions] business area (or the N'cst Vallee. Th„ Boulevard's pan in this potential commercial growth will be all the more significant with the de- velopment of the regional mall at Foothill boule- vard and the I-15 Frcewae. The purpoee of Ihia Plan .r to pr^vide a !v!anced and unified pa« ern of development along Foothill Roulec;u'd by Taking advantnce o(oppo~iunities in .......-. wumuu p,,vn w. SUBAREA 1 Bear Gulch" i rY,~1fA,P..• SUBAREA 2 SUBAREA 3 'Vlnayerd" "OIG Cucamonga" T ~~++ C.~ ] i `5,. r , ~L rao~,n ne Vier vn ~n ~~ %n~~~; o.., a a~ c ~ ~ nr Ceme. nc~~ : ,: ~m~. ~ . ..a, r FOOTHILt_ 80ULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AREA 1 The essence of the Plan is to facilitate the devel- opment of projects and public improvements which meet these criteria: ' Provide high qua/iry standards ' /lelp unify the eommunitiy'S image ' Reflect the communities heritage ' Snengthen the economic viability of the eonidor ' Provide a 6nlaneed mir of land uses or tenants ' Dca1 effectivel}• widt traffic and safer prnblzms WHY A SPECIFIC PLAN ? The Specific Plxn is a tool that combines traditional zoning with deMiled design and development standards tailored to specific conditions. It is a comprehensive document ~chich co^tains ;.I. politics and dcvek~pnrcnt standards necessary for the desgn of any project within the Foothill Boulevard Cuu iuui. Tile ~peciiic ruin examines the needs of the commercial and residential area and implements the policies of the General Plan. Because the conditions along the condor vary significantly, the Plan and its Development Standards are divided into four subareas. Each of these planning areas have unique problems and opporhmities: SUBAREAI "!sear Gnlch" Crave to Cucamonga Creek SUBAREA 2 "~'incyart(" Cucamonga Creek to f-lellman Ave. SUBAREA3 "0(d Grcumongn" Hellman to Deer Creek SUBAREA 4 "Etiwanda" I-15 to East Avenue Development Standatds unique to each subarea are used to provide the necesswy guidelines for development. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan includes four major elements: ' Cnmm~mit}•Design ` LanA U.tie ' Circu(ntian ' hnldrmcnutrinn SUBAREA 3 SUBAREA 4 "Old Cucamonga' I 'EOwanda' I i _~ ___-___ ~r -~.' i, _ :«`. F~,u'••~'~ el r B rPnup F I errru.~ rirn eernf.rr ~_nri~ uCnBnl -- ~ Y COMMUNITY DESIGN '1'hc Plan nim> lu el t~~ully unrfc d~,c mnirr anri nr. Tu dntir the l~Irci~ti 'r'xn nI'Ic idel'I II Ih'~ nl e ~u L~~Ir 1 ~ ~c'iv' mhi~h ,lm h~f.u1 m 'i I(:I ~ ~ rf I I Un , Ir.«'iv d~•.i._n .fa Ioik ~~. >. /~lllOl C: ~~CIY,crs .,^: 1911]1? U; ;^LL':C~I .: ~....~ ;LL m;Qor in;enCeunrn ;:r.d,nr :andmarka a:nc,_:P.; Cbrridr,r. ~Il;ev ;;re In proci.ie !ndi~ ,.!~: ~; iJve;i;:. h\' COI;:CI1;.';,:; r. ~: q:ltileG',.;: ;:... I:_c ;:; I'..,, O.h~~~;n. I:. _.... w Rn~rl:i:i ~a lir~rr l;a.`:'h * FOn!h'il :a;lri'Ilib,r5.(aroutt * (rn~rill;! at '1}u'nrr ,l vrrurr Il ~ I _ ~ 4 ~ H _ -.__...~~ ~T.,{ __ ` .., _. -, . _.. . . «-(4 . . 1 Y \ i~C: _\~:. ,r~ ~ - ,, These nrLCin~.'enler. ;ve pcncr; .It mare ~.: r!:,m I:. n~n~re, u iih hui!d in;_~ c'.n.cr n~ :ile ~;rdc: e:IJ s .,,,, cr ~ .. ,. ,.n ~ .. ~, i..IC t!C~I ~_'0. •..1 i ~ L Y+V ~A ~ ...,:, ', r'. ~,: t J I• Sit Y: ~~~ ~ ~.-05~i~..~ 11e. a '1 T•.". !`_i:~=5k;. ~. ~ ~ . ..-._ ~`.~'~ . t, Yv~ ~ ; i ~ I j i . ~.. t I C~ ~` 4 ~ i ~ n1 ~~ r t 4 ~ r. ; -- ~'~i~~trr, I . i. ' 4,`~ I r r I 1 r ' 1 1 1 i 0 uhurf• t Pvlss;av Transitirnt These areas link the activity centers with a Iess fomtal strceiscape design to include me;rndering/undulu;im~ sidewalks and infomml landscaping. Buildings in these nrcns hove deeper sclbucks and are often scpnra;ed from the street by land>arped pnrkinu area S. .1 rchilechu~e: One of the more recognizable mpecis of n conununily design image i.e its ;vchitecnu'al s!ple. 'I'bis PLm recognize+ the import;mca of theconvnunnd c h~ri ri.m .r„I ~, r,..,r ~r,.,, ,.; ~ ...:.:....... ..:. .~ .......... ...... ..,.. .,,, „~~~r.+, e..~r ;rchitci coral clcmcnla ainr,g the bo;devanl. '1'.ic Pl:m doc.e trot iinul ;uch;:raurc ^au.~ncle Ihc;nc rYr sivlc. R:nher. it edl+ Grr urcl~,i;crmrc to bar: m+ eere;in elemmtis I}om hixvanc;d style,. (ounJ in Rancho !',ia;unanyu. 'I~his arrhia•: wr;rl roncc'pt ;s su'ongiy r. ncouragcd rhrr~ughnu; [he cgrridnr, and parts: ularrly in the .a li vily ccntcr+, wirers rei>ung Iusinrua SIrOC(l;i'CS «'R'C' .:S " arch IICCIU^:li dCll"rml^Itnl?~~ Izl:n'rn,r ligor• rno.~tnsBUOs.llrvrliv ~/ ",1r..~'I.(xmsnnlrrs - -- - __ !yd _ ISSPOSf'.I> RAPII~.K 'I':V LS ~__ ~`,_ ~' _~ .~.,_.., .__. _.._ 1 r-_-.__._-- ~._e _..._._ ,_.~_ ~~ DgNl-6 5T4000 ~OM`O k Bp-IG~- /'y`E/~- WpLGS BITTEN /'bGl~- ~~~ dn6i-c ii it viv"ir' aim P/J~H ~Ih~F /''~F /`c~F i&!~ - ~ ~ l~~yr~~ / (~~ TO/~~`S ~P~ /~'l N61'i ~/„~W r` /~5 WiNOAws t i,n~'n rtis In ;m eC(or[ [o cstahlis!t dtc Corridor ;IS ~ t tah;c regional commercial ;vrt the p!nn prucide> ti,r signitia!nt atmmrreiul opporwnidct along the boulet'an!. 'I'hc land cso designations :mJ ut'tivitir~ hava hecn c;;rcf t!i!e scletted [o cnhunre t!tc c'ont rnutit> de>ign force pt and improve rti' conune~tiai viahility. The PI!m is miL,red to cniyue oppon:mih.es r.• ! wiu!:;tinis of seitt'(ed arch, :md eon Ltin<.peci:,l hmd use prnvisicats highlighted hc!uN; Rc,,;o.t.,nt. R..!,,:.d ('~~.tt...i rcinl rR('i This i:CCg:,rv is hk;aed inunrd i;rte!v :ui;;:ren; In the cart a!de of the I-1$ Prt•cti:ly to take ntlt:m~ ;age ut Iitc !and~,t f; eev:;n' exposure and c!nx proximity' to the regional moll, The intern i~ u, provide aciuble environment for rcuulers u( n•- giomll n;uure that ail! not h,r;ur within the n:,r.! itself. l~l`.i~ dct!enntion uas incorpot':'.!ed !n;o dte P a !:: h:ci:it:ue sprrl:l!i>ed decr!op:nent a.`Lrrim :'n and ucnvity ccu:ers along !hc Corridn:. 'Phc in:c::: here it ;n proe'd b: hr ~.~.. t!',iui!n. pedrrri;!r. on cc:ed :Irtiv LLe are: ~. ~It hl`. r,:;:np c>;;'n!isiunena. rnicnammc:n ;u:.l .pc.'iait.',t!nppi:•, _. "Il~.c loc,!~ tii,a I,f Ih(p dc.,,;`:::!rn:•: :. :.. Lr~ ;,. ra.. .!a ;;,Cots: " luu'r,md:1'. rr.!a'l:Rrrarri:.:: ~I r'rhi!+,.:i ,.,vurr Axrr,rr;n . In uddta,nt, !Im 19:et eallt tar r:n,re vatL Bonn! eontmcr:n!. :'ha•. :;;:,! rrJdrn;u:! der c!opm;r.:.. tcnh tSJUt on yrdlut, i,;,La n: c. !:n.l J:`nmr.~nut idcn!~a. ,i t _ ". t 2i `~ :'. ~~5• 'I~ y ~. _ .. .1 CIRCULATION A major concern to which the Nhm must provide solutions is that o(funvc tru Clip' con,'estion. The tra!!l~~ nnnlysis predicts :m ultim:ue doily Vaffic count of 50,000-60,000 curs. 'Chic me;ms thn; the impt~r,:mce of adequate valfic control measures cannot be over-emphasixe~,1, 9l~i.e Plan calls !or the cans7uction of Foothill Boulcvanl us a six h:ne dn'ide,l :c2•rml, u'~.th: * Synchronized signalization at all intersections. * A continuous medi;m isamd, with openings lin•. ~,teU to major intersections and selec,ed uddnion:d locutions Seie~ted uwess iuc:nion poim5 on Fonti±iii Boulevard based un a rea!r.rtn'a police for drive~~~a~ lozr.t`.nn; and mininnunspacine. * Multiple Ieft :ern lanes and sopr.,ttc right n turn lanes ;¢ ct'it~.:al inierseciit~:•,. Arn~,rw• ry,~r srr~afa+Krsaa ^T M~'i'l'N MJSV< N/~~~1l~+yi`.f.~I Aci+.9 -iYb/1'e1v T/rF l~pv!-~ 4 ( _ .. ~{ A ~4 /GH ~O HX~1 L~1/I/L v~i~fyf ~'.~ 9~ ~~ S~'CW6 •'~rr !'Ob'TIVC Y~(~/L/rve.rnNWT9 opc$JTl//J/ . i e7le~' ,°,roMtnwc li .. _ .. G~if!fYK I F4 . _.. ~~ L_ .. ~ ._ .. ~....... ~ - . t;, . ~~JY ~ ~ .. .. .. .. . , wc/w 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The Plan also provides criteria under which additional median openings or access points may be considered. I lowecac it must M1e rea~gr.ized that the corridor is an integral part of the City-wide and regional circulation system and th;a all traffic control nre;uuns must work in concert with one another. The desire to provide additional median openings or points of access to loe;dized ;vcas must be weighed against the boulevard's ability to c;trrv safely the projected volumes of trdfic. /f/ICY-/N/- /-Y~'F+~ LNCYf'YI rfearyaw,c«> i~*r~ yys---p'cs/ro w/.i"YY//:M~ ryr f.:w»r kwo-?,~ 9~_,0° ote{°r- sd~e-.~ ~ 1'~ ~~ -!'~~' ~~ ry/. g0'hitii4NGB CL2~ y \ ~cy~'«~ ~i ' n.1 ~~' ~I/// * ~~N~N. Try ~r-ftm G'tc ~•d~ x z,~.. r- A° /~"NrNlPS~Nl.r6 .'~ti~ r'--=f ~~ -~ TYPICAL MID-BLOCK LOCATION ~G",'bp ~4pp~' hey g~v;ero `.J7+Et~TPrt R.y,~rTr,•u- I ~t""Cf'~eYYfY QIY^r/ f>''~M~NBO r J`+T/Lf°r`!7 ~7t6f r!-+SNT :y~'lHT j fOb NrC~h~- W/et^nnv~ PcnNT;t+'i ,~'uesf 7 ~-nn Pors,+ i ~ra+w 7 rear ~~ i ~ xis I~~'p.. ~rvrrnr~ PerA?nM/ %'r W,•TO>'M4PM'j li ~! ~, Y fJ~2riy ~/L05''bb H/ y r,v~a erP+~e^s y'Prv1' ~~~~'~ ~ z ~_L~ MEN//~N P~vg"-//~ <OT Ui'~9hN No06 /~/6/1T/Nb L/6h'T/Nb 6/bN77Nb o~N~rrtn f~/!NTi1/.v i rr-n ~ P~nno/,L .III BoltiMfl i /fin NT~i°- ~V f JohBO A^G~'h /%N GONCr"67'Z' ~F~Nlirl 6P~°~ ~ s 6~ ~`''~ IMPLEMENTATION To ensure that the plan area develops successfully, the implemenmtion section provides suggested methods of fir,uncing for needed public imptovementa. Cost estimates :md proposed phasing of improvements :ve provided. ~.da xuiun includes a toe consouoauon program which provides incentives for small lot owners to work rogether with the Redevelopment Agency ro improve development potential at certain larger areas. 'the Plan also recognizes the need to bring high aaies volume businesses into the City, and this section suegesis certain incentive to attract these strong market performers. In addition, it is recognized that d:e existing bust: ~~sses along the corridor need to be helped in the corridor's revitalization with n small business assisrmce program with the Redevelopment Agency, Small Ciusiness Administration, and other programs. ~ PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 1 ' NOTE TO READER: TAis draft is a compendium of a cam- muni~ty effort that took many hours oT - discussion and work. A design document such as this is by nature inclusive of words and phrases that are not precise. There are many ways to say the same wiry. We request comments on this draft fn - areas only where substantive revisions are necessary. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN June 12, 1987 'C.1! )`' ! n ~_ jy ~ __ ~' - v 7 ..,i i 1J~ ' City Council: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Pamela J. Wright Charles J. Boquet, II Jeffrey King Deborah Brown -- Planninn Commission: - Larry McNiel, Chairman Suzanne Chitiea, Vice-Chairman Peter Tolstoy Bruce Emerick David Blakesley Ad Hoc Committee - Suzanne Chitiea Linda Eddy John Holt Tom Kohl Gary Mitchell - Paul Saldana Jeff Sceranka - Deborah Brown* Lynne Kraus* ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Staff Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Jack Lam, Community Development Director Brad Buller, City Planner Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner Allen Warren, Associate Planner Consultant: ~~-AI~VQ~ ~~( URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DKS ASSOCIATES BILL MANN 6 ASSOCIATES * Participated in 1986 ' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN bl f C t T e o s a onten PART I: COMMUNITY BACKGROUND ' 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Setting ' 3.0 Opportunities and Constraints PART 11: DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 4.0 Goals and Objectives 5.0 Community Design Concept 6.0 Land Use Concept 7.0 Circulation Concept PART III: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 6.0 General Design Guidelines and Development Standards PART IV: 9.0 Subarea Design Standards and Land Use P.egutations PART V: IMPLEMENTATION 10.0 Implementing Strategies PART l COMMUNITY BACKGROUND 1 1 i 1.0 INTRODUCTION t.t PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to guide land use and Community Design along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. This will be acwmplished by a comprehensive set of regulations, incentives and Community Design Guidelines, along with related implementing actions designed to encourage optimum development. The ideals of both public and private interests can be best realized through the specific plan process which provides a key link between the general plan and specific implementation actions. It serves as a means of managing the use of land, establishing provisions for detailed com- munity design concepts, and promotes a comprehensive approach to implementing these actions. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is a report consisting of text, conceptual plans, design guidelines, and exhibits regulating development withir, the Foothill Corridor. The motivation to undertake this study was stated in the Foothill Boulevard interim policies; "to establish a high quality, attractive and unifying design image reflective of community heritage and provide a viable setting for a balance mixture of residential and commercial activities with safe and efficient traffic circulation and access." This goal has further been defined through the study process and expanded in the goals and objectives contained in Section 4.0 of this document. 1.2 AUTHORITY The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is established through the authority granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, by the California Government Code, Title 7, Division t, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457 (specific plans!. The California Government Code estab- lishes the authority for a legislative body to adopt an ordinance or resolution re- quir'~ng that a specific plan be prepared when it is in the public interest to do so. As with general plans, the Planning Cnmmiccinn m mt 4.,.1,1 3 ^i4'lIC h::.-:.g before the planning agency can recom- mend the adoption of a specific plan by ordinance or resolution. This Specific Plan is regulatory in nature, and serves as zoning law for the proper- ties involved. Development plans, site plans and tentative tract/parcel maps in this area must be consistent with both this Specific Plan and the City's General Plan. The scope of subjects covered in the Plan is the same as that of the Gen- eral Plan, to the extent that the subject under consideration involves the Foothill Boulevard portion of the City. 06!12/87 INTRODUCTION 1.3 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT C LIANCE In compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City of Rancho Cucamonga envi- ronmental procedures, and in conjunction with the preparation of the draft Specific Plan, an EIR has been prepared for the Specific Plan area and circulated to the appropriate parties for review and comment. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR addressed the potential environ- mental impacts which may result from the implementation of the proposed Plan, and discussed alternatives and mitigating measures to actions contained within the Plan. The EIR will be utilized in the processing of individual projects within the study area as a "program EIR" as provided for in Section 15168 of the California Envi- ronmental Qualify Act. It is anticipated that individual projects will be subject to environmental review by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to determine consis- tency with the project as described in this document. A determination may be made that no further environmental docu- mentation is necessary; mitigation meaaurea inciuueu iu iiiia uuwui~uf .»dy be applied to these projects. However, where individual projects may result in impacts beyond the scope of those exam- ined in this document, further environ- mental review -- possibly in the form of an expanded initial study or environ- mental impact report -- may be required, and additional mitigation measures beyond those included in this document may be imposed. r'iN r" "" i PUBLICnn INPUT r JNt tN S~ e ovnoNSZ~' 06112/8) INTRODUCTION 1.4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan has incorporated a high level of participation from property owners, residents, staff members, Planning Commissioners, City Council persons, and developers within the Specific Plan area through the form- ation of an ad hoc working wmmittee. The committee was selected by the City Council in order to provide input to the City Staff, planning consultants, Planning Commission, and City Council. The com- mittee met in this advisory capacity dur- ing the preparation of this Specific Plan, to review and discuss all conceptual land use plans, policies, and design concepts contained in this document. The views, opinions, attitudes, and preferences of the ad hoc working committee, individually and collectively, have been used in preparation of the Specific Plan and related documents. LJ *L PUBLIC INPUT 1.5 PLAN ORGANIZATION The Foothill Boulevard Speclfic Plan serves to identify salient policies affect- ing the subdivision, parcel map, master plan or site approval levels and is the fundamental reference for determining basic use, residential densities and stan- dards for development. It provides the framework within which individual pro- jects must work if the entire area is to develop in a sensitive orderly, and cohesive fashion. The plan consists of the following major sections: 1.5.1 Community Background. Describes the setting as well as major opportunities and constraints of the planning area. 1.5.2 Goals, Objectives, and Policies. Specify the foundation for what the Specific Plan is designed to accomplish and establishes a framework of policies for how specific goals, and objectives will he achieved. 1.5.3 Concept Plans. Describes the several component plans that Corm the irameworK of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The components address the following topics: Land Use; includes the overall cor- ridor land use plan, and subarea concept plans. Vehicular Circulation; describes circulation concepts, access re- strictions, and provides design guidelines related to circulation features. Community Design Plan; provides an overall community design plan which details various image enhancement elements including gateway and entry treatments. Community Design Guidelines; pro- vides specific design guidelines related to architectural Imagery, landscaping, and site planning. 1.5.4 Development Regulations. Provides the necessary development standards to assure consistency with the specific plan ob- jectives and policies. 1.5.5 Implementation. Describes strategies re- lated to implementation of the Specific Plan; including phasing, financing pro- grams, and redevelopment agency participation, 1.5.6 Environment Im R rt ( rate document Identifies environmental impacts associated with the proposed Specific Plan and outlines mitigation measures. 1.5.7 Phasing Plan. provides a phasing program focused on staging private development with public facilities. ' 06112187 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SETTING 2.1 LOCATION The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan study area traverses the City of Rancho Cucamonga in an east/west fashion. De- signated as Route 66, this Important transportation feature was originally designed to accommodate transcontinental motorists, ultimately linking the east coast to the west coast. However, with the advent of a prominent statewide free- way system in the late 60's and early 60's, Route 66 declined as a major intra- state corridor. Within a local context, the Foothill Boulevard corridor provides a major cir- culation function by linking the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga with the cities of Fontana and Upland. In general, the planning area is composed of a variety of individually owned parcels which front the corridor. The Specific Plan project area comprises aver 560 acres of which nearly one-half (1/2) have been previously developed. The planning area can be described as a highly visible urban oriented transportation corridor which is ..n.. ~1.~.._~e.i.n.l h„ a •iaty of ccmmerc~al, residential, and office land uses. The corridor itself is currently described as going through a metamor- phosis from a regionally oriented transportation corridor, serving the needs of the motorists, to a Ioc al urban oriented highway designed to serve the needs of the community. 2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The entire Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area consists of approximately 560 acres. Currently, commercial loffice development t,Olnor ises the maiority cf acreage within the planning area (124 acres) and is characterized by a variety of commerciallo(fice oriented land uses which range from Ia rqe district level retail uses, such as Rancho Town Center, 06!12167 to small service oriented comment iat establishments, however, the majority of these existing commercial office uses consist of strip commercial developments which typically provide convenience services to local residents. Typical commercial parcel sizes and configurations vary in size; however, the maiority of these individually owned parcels are small fragmented lots characteristic of strip commercial developments. As previously discussed, the Foothill Boulevard Corridor represents an Important regionally related circulation feature which, with the demise of Route 66, has become a local oriented circulation feature. Presently this major circulation is operating below capacity, however, future development of the Victoria Gardens Regional Center, coupled with bufidout of the indu strlal area and the two planned communities (l~lc toria and Terra Vista). will most likely tax the traffic carrying efficiency of this arterial. Secondary streets which traverse the planning area are characterized by Archibald, Vineyard, Grove, Etiwanda,and Fact Avernnes which continue to function as community oriented circulation features designed to serve the localized traffic needs of neighborhoods Iy irg north and south of the planning area. The existing character of the plannirxl area consists of a non-desc rcpt, strip oriented commercial corridor comprised of a variety of land uses lacking any defini- tive, consistent, unifying urban image. Currently the corridor is characterized as an auto oriented path with the absence of any community oriented activity centers. SETTING 1 Architecture styles range from large franchise modern retail establishments such as Rancho Towne Center, to small scale eclectic structures such as the Magic Lamp and Sycamore Inn Restaurant. While no single architectural theme exists within the wrridor, a variety of signi- ficant, individual, architectural structures such as the Thomas Brothers Winery, Sycamore Inn and Magic Lamp do prevail. While the corridor is primarily charac- terized by a lack of a consistent street tree species, it does contain clusters of London Plane trees and California Syca- mores which typically dominate new developments. Existing landscape expressions are also limited and do not fully reflect the importance of this prominent regionally related corridor or the rural heritage of the community. 2.3 E%ISTING USES/OWNERSHIPS Over the years the Foothill Boulevard Corridor has evolved into a mixed use area defined by a variety of development. Quality and condition vary from exemp- lary contemporary projects to substandard and visibly deteriorating urban forms, with many examples between these extremes. The dominant use along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor is strip commercial which has developed over the years on a disjointed, incremented manner. Residen- tial uses comprise a significant amount of the study area and are found in the form of large mobile home parks and several contemporary apartment complexes as well as some low density single-family residences located along the fringe of the study area. The majority of the Specific Plan area is divided into small, non-contiguous land- holdings primarily located in between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue. Also, ownership in this area is fragmented, making land/lot consolidation difficult. The area from I-16 to the easterly city limits is comprised mostly of relatively large undeveloped parcels. Ownership in subareas 1, 2 and 3 is fragmented, making land consolidation difficult. 06112/87 SETTING 2.t SUB-AREAS In an effort to break down the study area into related components, four (41 sub-areas where established to focus attention to land use, circulation and community design issues (see following pages). 2.5 SURROUNDING USES immediately surrounding the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan study area is a mixture of suburban land uses which include: residential, industrial, open space, and undeveloped areas. Subarea 1 is bounded on the north and south by residential uses of low to medium density. The Redhill Country Club and Golf Course is located northwest of the study area. The Southern Pacific Railroad diagonally bisects the subarea in a northeast to southeast direction while Cucamonga Creek traverses the subarea in a north to south direction. Subarea 2 is bounded on the north and south by low and medium density resi- dential uses. III Subarea 3 is bounded on the north and south by low and medium density residen- tial uses. Deer Creek comprises the east boundary of the subarea and traverses the edge of this subarea in a north/south direction. Subarea 4 is generally bounded by vacant land. 06/12/87 SETTING ~~.,3> I J~ j J -- I'-- ,w-~- `M '~ - - ' ; ~.~G~IG •'~~~~~ ~;~,~ ~ 1°~ ~a~~~ .J ~. ~ a; i_1''_"'' 9 I ~ . ~ ~, l: I I ~ n~• .,~~ % , DING SUB AREA ONE 1~ OO'CIiII,I. 13OUI,I;V~1; Pt]FPLnFfI Fnn T4C /`ITV n tJ I'I'.I'J. I I I, FTC nw~~IV..tlMIR SETTING SI` ~ -~ h a F o s '~ S, L~' ~ i 8 i \ L_ i .L r J f .`.'- L= ~ ~ ~ L_-.. c i a r r V i Z z z C i W D --~. ~ ;~~ : m ,,: D A L LL ~~ cctL=L-t~:~ i-~. ~ .. '='=tiuk4'~ ti ~C LL:i-4GcG:~ FI ~oL. ~_L[L! _. L ~ _~ ~ ~` ~`- \_~. I `I ~.., ~ ,~ ~~ i i ; m __._.:~. ~,. x z- 4s~ kl~ ~I '0 r ,~ Z z z c ~.. ~ ^~ J` ~ ~~ W ~..Ll.{44x.1:{. L. ~' ~~ " LiLCttL C L'- L-L l,~`- ~~~ ~~ v `. 9 ,...I ~. .y ; ~: 1. `~' I U~ V L ~L 1^ L ,~, ll ~ `/ ~" _.. L, ~. L `~ ~~ ~.. 1~ 4 ~_. ~ ~. L~: L" I~ ~~ ~ ~ i L. C ~ j !- I I` ~ ~ ,i .--- ~~ s~ c c G L I~ C I~ I m ~~ ~_ c ~~ a r' 2 ^_ =% ,i it :. Z ~ _Z Z c D N '~~ a i w i I -~ i` ~~' u~L'LL~~~: ~. C `' LL L LL. L-LU L"CLL L~ _ ~4t ~_GLI.~L~L: L cc~ ~Ltu_cL[L ..`~l `~~.L"l'GU~ ~._ r. ~. ~ l ~..~, , L '- I_ FL L ~..-, Iry U~ i ` L L ~~ ~ ~~: k }~ L ~~ Z__~« L: ~ v _ ~- S L ` ~. LL. e L ~. '~ ~~ L--'y L - ... L ~~ I I L ~ '' L I L C' I _~~Lic u C `- I ~ L_ i, L ~_ e ,. .. I ~ ~, ~ 7 r U,L m ;; ., w ~~ E ^ >I~ z D Z Z l~ V, C D ~m ~~" _.:'~ D ~ W ~c'r [~ ~ ,~~~CC ~. ~`~~~ , '.i Wb(l\ax\S e . ~~ass.~:at~(~ti L c-. ' ~ : EE °~" E4%` JJ e~ °`.~ - - -, „-r ~S~EE z L I - ~ `~ I '- I ~L i ~~C ~e ~.. L L i _ ~ I ~ ! j --; ` ' Ls ~ ~? . c IU c ~ ~ 7.~ `' ~, .. I ~~ i; ~~ ~i ~i ;` Lc ~ ~ i ~ L= ~ CS` CL ~' ~ _ . ~ . "= _ . I Ufr r I ~+~` /. ~ cf~,. II_r..-.._~1-..J ri ~4 S ~ 'rzl t~ . _ , ~ ~~' -, ~'" - 0 0 { =~~- .71 .~-~ ~ I W f ~ ~ _ ~~ i ~ _s ~ ~ ~~~~~~l, ~ ---- ~ ~ •z~ ~ C3 i j ~~ ~~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ . _ ~~_~ > I ~ ~~'~~ f _ _l7: J a I _ ~ 1 m i _ ~~ r - ~-~~_ w j - --_ - -~=ate=a:~ ---_ ~ ~ ~~ ~ -~~~ __ ~ ~~~x ~~- _ ~ ~ ~~ •~ ~~ ~\ ._ _ ~YOFti ii(~ ____II{ \. ._ ..._._ _ _ i 0 U U O 2 Q } F N LL 0 W Q a w a Vii: fi. c S~ ~ O \ iJ-' i .....~ L__-.. lr `. u: ' ~ L LPL L L:_ / L ~x 4 ~i „i' L l1. 1\ lL~. r v L_' L`y 1 r \L t ~~~ `~ .._.._ t ~~\:L :. r ~ ~ ~ L L r q ._ ...,. __ [~~. ~' .'~~' ~ ~ C. << ,~- 9 ~ ~' 9 \''. L o ~~- < r m ~`'. ~ n ~ ' . : `\: ~ c~ y m J '. O ,`: d ! : 1 I ` '\'i . . ILLS; \ ~~ ~~~~`- V~ i'~~ i i~y c C- I`, ~~C.`.XJ„~VCl:1:Cl:~:C i~ ' I ~ C.~: ~ ~.:.: ': _..~ ------ -~ . .. , ' b I r Z Z i C ,_ _ D ~- ~ -~_ ~ , D ^ Iy 'i~~ O i L ~ z m L,: V~ A 3.0 OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ' 3.1 INTRODUCTION o Opportunity to consolidate lots through City redevelopment The Foothill Corridor planning area has incentives and Master Plan ' undergone a transformation over the requirements. years from a rural oriented highway lRoute 66) to a major community oriented o Opportunity to establish discount ' commercial boulevard. This trans- formation has manifested itself in a oriented commercial centers and h t l f ili i hi h o e ac t es w c are contiguous variety of land uses and built forms to the I-15 Corridor whicfi would which have developed at different periods not compete with future regionally ' of time. The corridor is a collection of related commercial activities. commercial, residential, and office uses. Associated wish this change are various o Implementation of a pragmatic Land potential opportunities and constraints Use Plan designed to created urban ' which become the foundation for the activity centers at key locations. development of the Specific Plan. These opportunities and constraints include the o Opportunity to establish major ' following: community gateways where Foothill Boulevard intersects with Grove and 3.2 OPPORTUNITIES East Avenues. ' o The C id ' l ti orr or s oca on as a major o Opportunity to preserve significant east/west transportation link which existing landscape features such as traverses the center of the City. the East Avenue eucalyptus grove and the eucalyptus windrow o Existing landmark structures contiguous to Foothill Boulevard, including the Thomas Brothers east of the AT E SF overpass. ' Winery, and Sycamore Inn. - o Relationship to the Law and Justice u neueP~u re sales ieaKage. Center, Barton Plaza, and the Haven o Shopping behavior is sti!I in a Avenue Corridor. formative stage. - o Opportunity to strengthen and establish perceived activity centers o Tremendous growth potentia', - which include Bear Gulch, the Thomas Brothers Winery (Foothill and Vineyard), 4he Archibald Towne ~ Center (Foothill and Archibald), and ' I the Etiwanda Gateway (Foothill and - Etiwandal. ~ ~ ~~'~ "~ o A smattering of large parcels exist (! within [ho .^.~ 3re3, cre3t'ng ^ - the opportunity of establishing mixed ' commercial/residential products. 06/12187 OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS 1 1 3.3 CONSTRAINTS o Lack of cohesiveness, function and community focal points. o Continued increase in vehicular traffic. o Numerous fragmented parcels with individual owners. o Current strip commercial orientation composed of transitional commercial uses which lack concentrated activity centers. o Lack of significant pedestrian gateway areas including plazas, cultural or entertainment features. o Location of existing potentially conflicting residential land uses. o Lack of tourist or regionally related commercial land uses. o lack of a consistent and continuous urban design and landscape theme image. o Vacant land is fragmented. o Majority of vacant land is less than 1.0 acre in size. o Image of corridor is fragmented. o Existing commercial centers in adjacent cities draw sales dollars (Montclair Plaza, Auto Dealershipsl• o New commercial center in City are strong draws from Foothill Boulevard economic activity (Lewis, William Iyounl. u iced i-iiii fauiz. o Etiwanda Creek flood hazards. 05(12!87 OPPORTUNITIES E CONSTRAINTS ' DEVELOPMENT ~ PART 11 FRAMEWORK 1 1 1 4.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES STATEMENTS 4.1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this section is to articulate the Goals, Objectives, and Policies for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and begin the foundation for subsequent sections of this plan. Goals are broad statements that define the community's hope for the future. They are general in nature and do not indicate when and how these goals are to be accomplished. Objectives are statements of intent that generally guide future decisions in specific topic areas. Policies are more specific statements of intent to deal with particular topics in certain fashion. They begin to define the approach to be taken to achieve the plan objectives, and are in themselves the first step in the development of a solution as they form the basis for standards and regulations. q.2 OVERALL STATEMENT 4.3 COMMUNITY DESIGN COAL: Create a community design image that expresses and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. 4.3.1 Obiectives o Develop a streetscape system which reinforces the existing suburban parkways as vehicular areas and designates major street intersections as pedestrian activity center nodes, throughout the corridor. o Provide a system of vehicular gate- way nodes which announce and identify entries into Rancho Cucamanga and achieve an overall positive identity for the area. o Promote compatible building eleva- tions which provide transition at pedestrian areas to higher elevations while protecting adjoining residential neighborhoods. GOAL: To create a dynamic concourse that is attractive and of high quality with a unifying cemmunity design image re- flective of community heritage and iden- tity, providing an economirally viable setting for a balanced mixture of com- mercial and residential uses with safe, efficient, circulation and access. In an effort to further define and prioritize this overall goal statement, the following Community Design, Land Use/Economic, Circulation, Environmental, Infrastructure, and Cultural Histori c_a_I goals and objectives era provided. o Promote contemporary landscape treatments throughout the corridor particularly those that are low maintenance, drought resistant, and able to withstand high winds and intense urban conditions. o Provide for the elimination of visu- ally objectionable views such as out- door storage and loading areas through the use of design guidelines. ~~ ~,~ 06/12/87 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES o Promote distinctive, intense, com- mercial clusters which are sensitive to historical characteristics at key activity center nodes, such as those at the western entry to the City (Archibald, at Vineyard Avenue, and easterly from the Devore Freeway intersection). o Require master planning at kev sites within the Specific Plan study area to assure integrated development utilizing coordinated access, parking, building orientation/locations, pedestrian and transit facilities. o Employ aMixed-Use Development Concept to reduce the number of larger vacant commercial properties and encourage infill development, while providing opportunities for residential development. o Ensure the gradual upgrading of under-utilized land uses functioning at less than their market potential. o Reconfigure elongated parcels and improve access to lots which are located in the easterly subareas of the Foothill Corridor. o Devise mechanisms for the physical upgrading of existing developments with recognized significant architectural and historic value. 4.4.2 Policies o Establish regulations and provide incentive bonuses which promote pedestrian oriented plazas; and en- courage intensive comme^cial uses at key activity nodes along Foothill Boulevard. o Prepare Development Regulations and Guidelines which simplify the development review process. o Establish regulations for mixed use developments which assure proper land use mixture, minimum lot size, access restrictions, buffering, and master planning. o Preserve historic retail commercial uses li.e., Thomas Brothers, Sycamore Inn(. o Establish an incentivelbonus program of lot consolidation for small, shal- low parcels along the corridor to encourage development into planned concentrations, as opposed to a linear strip commercial configuration. o Allow nonconforming uses to continue as per current City policies and regulations. o Encourage the formation of new redevelopment programs to assist retail and service businesses with property improvements. o Develop incentives to encourage specialty commercial clusters at key activity center nodes. ~,i i I ~.`. 1 `-' 06/72/87 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES i n.s,z Policies Develop consistent streetscape and architectural palettes which are sensitive to creating a "heritage" statement for Foothill Boulevard. It is not t e intent of this thematic overview to discourage innovative or contemporary architectural expressions, or to imitate the architecture of the past, but to promote the harmonious co- existence of architectural styles varying from restoration to contemporary architectural themes. Require compliance with the com- munity design guidelines in plans for new development, expansion or re- development, and make community design a major consideration in site plan review and approval. Utilize landscape materials within the corridor which are clean, safe, wind resistant and relatively low maintenance. Formal forms and configurations should 6e utilized at activity center nodes while less formal, suburban type configurations .L...1 .1 1 +~ tCV \I II VVy11VU\ \Ilb parkway links in between. Develop an incentive program which rewards private sector development for providing certain "extra" design amenities within their developments. Of particular interest are solar- control devices such as building overhangs, awnings and extra tree plantings in parking lot areas. Consideration should be given to special paving materials used in place of asphalt in vehicular areas. Consider economic incentives for owners who wish to architecturally rehabilitate, refurbish or upgrade landscaping on existing properties of significant cultural/historical heritage, but not expand. Designate special landscape and architectural features at major intersection locations, combining thematic plantings with ccmplementary architectural statements designed to promote a distinctive thematic charaMer for these activity center nodes. Changes in paving materials, plant materials, lighting, signing and siting of adjacent structures should occur at major intersections to enhance their distinctiveness. Any buildings identified as architec- turally significant such as the Thomas Brothers Winery or the Sycamore Inn should, where feasible and if necessary, be restored and integrated into adjacent development. Require development which is sensitive to significant natural iandrorms such as the hillside at the Sycamore Inn site (Red Hilll. 4.4 LAND USE/ECONOMIC GOAL: Develop a specific plan which is sensitive to community land use and fiscal needs. 4.4.1 Objectives Maximize the economic position of the Foothill Corridor commercial activities, capturing neighborhood and subr'egionaV demand. 06/12/87 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ' 4.5 CIRCULATION o ' GOAL: Develop a circulation system which facilitates efficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic and ' enhances the community design character o along Foothill Boulevard. 4.5.1 Obiedives e limit vehicular access points on Foothill Boulevard. 0 o Develop a mixture o£ land uses which reduce home work trips within ' the Corridor, and the City. o Provide for, and phase necessary street improvements to maximize the o efficiency of traffic along Foothill Boulevard. o Minimize vehicular through traffic on adjacent residential streets. o Encourage the use of local transit _ programs (shuttle bust whenever possible. 4.5.2 ~,.ics o Provide pedestrian-oriented amenities - and circulation features within key activity nodes by providing incen- tives to private development for pedestrian improvements. o Reduce inter site vehicular trips onto Foothill Boulevard by requiring private developments to secure Re- ciprocal Access Agreements prior to development. o Provide for transit facilities along Fcothi!I °oul -+ . avar., at cGn'vniient pedestrian locations. Allow shared narking and access to facilitate efficient parcel usage and to minimize traffic support facilities such as drives, parking spaces, etc. Discourage new commercial and re- sidential developments from taking any access from local residential streets, by developing internal circulation systems which direct traffic away from surrounding residential neighborhoods. Designate selected residential streets within the planning area as local streets, where conditions promote pedestrian movements over chose of the automobile. Promote the installation of a raised median within Foothill Boulevard in order to insure efficient and safe future traffic operations along Foothill Boulevard. o Promote the realignment of San Bernardino and Red Hill Roads in order to improve traffic operations and sight distance. o Promote the extension of Estacia Street west of Klusman, in order to redirect traffic from San Bernardino to Foothill Boulevard. o Discourage the future use of front- age roads along Foothill Boulevard. o Promote existing City access policies as adopted by the City Planning Commission for parcels located within the Specific Plan area. o Establish intersection geometric standards which provide for accept- able levels of traffic operations. o Promote the development of Malachite! Foothill as a complete 4- way intersection serving properties north of Footh~'I between Hellman and Klusman. 06!12/87 COALS AND OBJECTIVES ' 0.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ' GOAL: Maintain the highest possible quality of environment within the Specific Plan area, by balancing the impacts of ' development with environmental concerns. 4.6.1 Objectives ' o Locate precisely that portion of the Red full Fault, which lies within the Specific Plan area, and establish land use restrictions for areas adjacent to the fault. ' o Establish regulations which preserve significant environmental features, such as mature trees and windrows within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. 4.6.2 Policies o Limit development within the 100 year flood areas as shown on the latest City firm maps or provide flood protection measures in - accordance with City flood ordinance as approved by the City Engineer. o Appropriate drainage facilities shall be provided for specific developments as approved by the City Engineer. o Preclsely map that portion of the Red Hill fault which traverses the planning area, -- o Based on projected traffic volumes, map future noise contours, and establish land use restrictions and/or noise attenuation conditions for areas within noise impacted areas. _ o Require mapping of all significant on-site environmental features which -- are worthy of preservation. o For development within the Red Hill Fault area, require a detailed geo- technical study prior to project approval of City permits to determine the location, if present, of the fault, and any other limitations presented by geotechnical conditions. o Through the project approval pro- cess and the imposition of conditions or mitigation measures, ensure that all development within the Specific Plan area will not result in a de- crease in environmental quality, and will wherever possible create a higher quality environment. o Require the enforcement of the existing City Tree Preservation Ordinance. o Encourage that developments within the area impacted by noise rp ovide sufficient noise attenuation levels to maintain exterior and interior CNEL noise levels at acceptable levels as defined by the City Development Code (Section 17.02.120, Noise Abatementl . 06/12/87 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 4.7 INFRASTRUCTURE GOAL: Provide a high level of public services and facilities to all residents and residents and business along Foothill Boulevard. 9.7.1 Objective Coordinate all development activity with the construction of public infrastructure. n.7.z Policies o Roquira that aii public services and facilities are available or that other financial arrangements have been instituted prior to issuing building permits. o Develop an implementation program for the improvement, phasing and financing of infrastructure within the Specific Plan area. o Monitor utilization of public infrastructure systems, and program improvements to ensure capacity for future planned development. 4.8 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL COAL: Identify and preserve all historical and cultural resources within the Specific Plan area. 4.8.1 - Objectives - o Make cultural and historical re- _ sources within the Specific Plan known and accessible to the general public. .. PraaarvaUon ar~d er~Fancement of existing ~uitural and historical resources, and the establishment of new land uses compatible with and complementary to these resources. 4.8.2 Policies o Encourage the development of super- ior design which, in time, will add to the City's architecturally significant/historical resources. o Establish land uses which comple_ ment existing cultural and historical resources within the Specific Plan area, o Establish a signage system to direct the general public to cultural and historical features. o Develop a public information pro- gram to aid in the public awareness of cultural and historical resources within the Specific Plan area. o Prior to City permit approval or the issuance of building permits, ensure that all existing cultural or histor- ical resources worthy of preservation have been retained, salvaged, re- located, or otherwise protected from destruction. o Cooperate with local historical societies and representatives of qualified archaeological organizations in the identification and management of identified and potential historical resources within the Specific Plan area. o Require new projects to incorporate existing cultural and historical structures/facilities into their designs. ?, - a. 'r:i, XJ~~ I`1F ff~W1. _ 06112;87 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1 1 5.0 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 5.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the Specific Plan estab- lishes parameters within which the com- munity character for the entire Foothill Boulevard Corridor can be created. To do so, a number of issues and design concepts have been previously explored. However, at the core of all discussion and investigation has been the attempt to define community character in an accu- rate, comprehensive, and pragmatic manner. The Community Design Plan is primarily focused on the creation of aes- thetic character. IL's purpose is to create a visual environment that evokes a distinctive and unifying image which is unique to Rancho Cucamonga. To accom- plish this task, the Foothill Boulevard Corridor must first distinguish Itself from other major thoroughfares in nearby com- munities; and second, it must serve as a visually unifying concourse that links the entire community of Rancho Cucamonga. Lastly, it is important to have a design statement for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor with each contributing communi- ty design element skilfully orchestrated to promote a contiguous, cohesive, community decinn i The community design section consists of the following components: o Image Enhancement Features 15.21, define common community design qualities which enhance community image and identity. o Community Design Vocabulary (5,31, defines and describes various image enhancement features including nodes/activity centers, suburban parkway tran=_itions, !andmarks, gateways, and views. i ~ -~ ._ __- ___ Key Existing Community Design Feature (5.41, identifies a variety of existing community design features including prominent building struc- tures, and natural features. These elements hold potential for the Foothill Corridor. Overall Community Design Concept 15.51, describes overall design concepts related to subarea struc- ture, activity center and suburban parkway definitions, architecture, and landscape architecture. 5.2 IMAGE ENHANCEMENT FEATURES Community image is related to the way people experience the City -driving through it, observing its natural qualities and the character of it's buildings, walk- ing through commercial areas, and visiting specific destinaeions. The best communities have the following memorable image enhancement features: A clear sense of arrival through a distinct change in landscape, hard- - :.N=, ~~ m eaa, ~~ special entrance monumentation features. A civic, commercial, or cultural public urban open space, which de- fines the activities, history, com- merce, or natural/manmade features which the community as a whole values. Typical public urban open spaces consist of plazas, courtyards, urban paseos, market streets, historic landmarks, and public parks. A clear organization of streets, identifiable districts, and landmarks which gives people a sense of direc- tion and orientation. The extent of confusion in traffic circulation, and the amount of congestion increasing- ly figures in people's perceptions of cities. 6/12187 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 1 1 i Unioueness. This quality can be derived from a single feature, a district-wide theme reflecting ethnic or historical themes, or an event which is staged in a special place each year. A sense of glace in a shared past, which gives people a sense of belonging. 5.3 COMMUNITY DESIGN VOCABULARY In an effort to provide a unique com- munity image for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing or pro- posed image enhancement elements will he provided or enhanced, designed to in- crease corridor identity. Vocabulary of these image giving elements include the following: 5.3.1 Activity Centers Activity Centers are points of inter- section at major streets or landmarks along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. As such, they are points of concentrated activity which give identity to individual subareas. Major Activity Centers located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor include the areas surrounding the following intersections: o Foothill at San Bernardino o Foothill at Vineyard Avenue - o Foothill at Archibald Avenue o Foothill at Turner Avenue - o Foothill at Etiwanda Avenue The injection of small doses of urbanity at these key activity centers is suggested method for creating a more interesting, - '~ ^d ,• ., 'rprossion of 'he Foothill~Corridor.~ The Activity Center at Foothill and San Bernardino is a more _ rw-al, informal village design concept. 5.3.2 Suburban Parkway Transitions It is recognized that the Foothill Boulevard Corridor will not become a totally pedestrian oriented environment. Therefore, the five pedestrian oriented activity centers listed above, will be linked together by "suburban parkway" transition areas. These parkway transi- tion sections will consist of informal landscape treatments, dominated by drifts of London Planes, California Sycamore, and Purple Plum trees. Other parkway characteristics include rolling turf berms and meanderinglundulating sidewalks, de- signed to complement informal landscape treatments. 5.3.3 landmarks Specific elements of the environment that exhibit and promote an individual or uni- que identity include landmarks. Because landmarks are, by definition, unique and distinct, they are also few in number. Landmarks are typically associated with historic structures/features or prominent land forms which exhibit memorable qual- ities and project a strong identity or image. Landmarks located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor include: The Sycamore Inn The Oso Bear Monument The remnants of the Cucamonga China Town The Thomas Brothers Winery The Virginia Dare Winery The First U.S. Post Office site in Cucamonga John and George Klusman Houses Mitchell House vtaiiildle Huuse Bell House Guiders House Sacred Heart Aggazzotti Winery 6112181 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 1 1 o Sections of San Bernardino Road east S.P. bridge, north of Foothill Boulevard. 5.3.4 Catewavs Gateway elements are typfwlly associated with prominent landforms, landscape fea- tures, structures, or entrance monument- ation signs designed to announce entrance into a community or special districts. Currently, these gateway features are nonexistent within the planning area, which contribute to an overall lack of corridor definition or identity. Gateways are proposed for the intersections of Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard/East Avenue. •~, -~~ ENTRY PORTAL 1 Inl l,IVUC JrC\,IMI rIMnVOVMrC AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS"' IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AS WELL AS PRIVATE PROPERTY AS f DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT J 5.3.5 Views View opportunities are found within every subarea and range from expansive vistas of distant mountains, to tightly framed views of landmarks, prominent natural landforms, or other special features located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard. The critical requirement is that view op- portunities be recognized and enhanced, and that all proposed developments be designed to preserve and protect the desired view. , ]-LAY i 1' r J~ ij 6112/87 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 1 5.6 KEY EXISTING COMMUNITY FEATURES In an effort to promote community design within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing community design fea- tures have been identified. It is the intent of the community design plan to identify these elements in order that they may be preserved or enhanced. The following key community features are significant structures and are worthy of preservation/restoration and should be incorporated into any future development proposals for their respective sites. Key community design features related to the Foothill Boulevard include: 5.4.1 Thomas Brothers and Virginia Dare Wineries These wineries will become one of the major theme-setting community character elements for the Foothill Corridor. All streetscape/landscape and architectural components shall 6e sensitive to and compatible wish the overall winery theme of Rancho Cucamonga. Key visual ele- ments, such as grape arbors and trellis vie ..... _~._~~ ~_ along the Foothill Corridor. Architectural variations which fully reflect the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga shall be encouraged. The Thomas Brothers Winery, first estab- lished in 1839, is among the oldest in the state. The building reflecLS early CalifcrnialSpanish architectural influ- ences, characterized 6y such elements as stucco walls, board and batten siding, gable roofs, Spanish clay roof tiles, heavy weathered wood doors and entrance gates, and a vine covered grape arbor that extends the entire langth Of the 'N eSt a,^,d south building elevations. V ~j~~ dRBG-~ gi'1~V W~ h`/P sr~v ~o~ 6/1Tl87 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 1 1 s.s.2 Foothill Archibald Intersection This intersection is located at the center of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and holds potential for establishing a major, urban oriented, activity center. Develop- ment surrounding this intersection will promote pedestrian oriented retail ser- vices designed to serve the specialty needs of the community. Major redevel- opment on all corners, excluding the Millers Outpost Center, will promote active commercial uses within a pedes- trian dominated context. The opportunity of establishing a "commons" or public urban open space should be explored, de- signed to reinforce and promote pedestrian usage. g :i ~J'S,j~ !:N' .J J~ .7 a :J • 25' URBAN SETBACK • PEDESTRIAN LEVEL ARCHITECTURE STEPPED TO UPPER LEVELS • FORMAILANOSCAPE ARRANGEMENT • URBAN STREETSCAPE VOCABULARY • MAJOR URBAN DESIGN STATEMENT ALONG FOOTHILL • PUBLIC PLAZA SPACE • PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES s.n.s Sycamore Inn The Sycamore Inn activity center is dom- inated by a quality sit-down restaurant, complemented by small specialty oriented restaurants, shops, and support offices. Originally established in the 1880's this large two-story structure was wnstructed as an innlstage stop in the area com- munity known as Bear Gulch. The architecture is characterized by chateau and craftsman details. The building is sheathed in vertical wood siding and has a moderately pitched gable roof with a native stone chimney. The building and site are enhanced by the presence of numerous mature California Sycamore trees. 5.4.4 Magic Lamp Restaurant The Magic Lamp Restaurant is located in an eclectic building which is character- ized by brick walls, and a unique clay tiled hip roof. The roof of the structure is composed of a variety of roof tiles stacked in such a fashion as to provide a rich textured effect. The restaurant lies witnin the t5ear Gulch activity area. 5.4.5 Eucalvatus Windrows The remnants of a windrow are found on either side of Foothill Boulevard, east of the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge crossing which traverses the boulevard. The trees are mature and appear healthy, although are not maintained and set a distinctive open space character along Foothill Boulevard. 6/12(87 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 1 1 1 1 1 The following community features are notable structures and at the property owners option, can he incorporated Into a future development proposal. Any such proposal must be required to upgrade these structures to current City Dev- elopment Standards (i.e., building/safety, land use circulation/access, landscaping) or may be relocated off-sites. 5.4,6 Oid Diner 4zlidirrg (between 9670 S 9642) This former food establishment located near the intersection of Foothill Boule- vard and Archibald Avenue, is character- ized by wood and concrete block con- struction, a low pitched roof, exposed eaves, horizontal wood siding, and sirgle- hung windows. The diner appears in a horizontal configuration, reminiscent of classic diners. s,4.7 Old Route 66 Gas Station (9670) This former gas station, located near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue, Is comprised of two separate buildings which include an office, gas pump canopy and a separate garage twildlrg. the archrtectu re rs characterized by the use of white stucco parapet walls with small roof caps, antl spanish roof tiles. 5,4,8 San Bernardirro/Foothill (8291) This unusual building shows signs of streamline/art deco architecture. The building is characterized by two stream- line overhead drWe-under canopies that appear symmetrical and is also char- acterized by metal elevation panels, a flat roof, and a large sign column which is integrated into the i~ildiry facade. 6112 5.4.9 Duane's Service (12912 Etlwanda) This building was formerly a gas station composed of a main building with gas pump canopy and garages and a small out-building housing what appears to be the restrooms. Both buildings are Spanish-California in style, characterized by stucco exteriors, and spanish clay file roofs. 5.4.10 Former Mountain View School (9113) This residence, once utilized as a private children's school, Is representative of a California hu ngalow with Oueen Ann de- tails. Details include wood siding, gable door, and multi-light windows, and siding faces. In addition, there are several mature trees located in the front Yards of these bungalows. 5.4.11 Archibald House (Southwest Corner of rc a venue an stae a This residence appears very old with Victorian era overtones. The cottage is characterized by asteeply-pitched hip and gable roof, arches, yei~ie ueieii a, porch arches, and large multi-I fight windows. 5,4.12 Foothill House This two-story structure is characterized by a stucco exterior, gable roof, smaller peripheral residential units (rentals?) and mature landscaping. Note: This structure has been moved from the site. MUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 1 i 1 1 ^' a 1 5.5 OVERALL COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT The overall Community Design Concept is comprised of a hierarchy of urban design components which range from the devel- opment of large subareas, to specifically located district activity centers. The intent of the Community Design Concept is to provide a broad-brushed overview of eq neral design components which ulti- mately lead to the development of saecific design guidelines. The overall Community Design Concept consists of the following components: Subarea structure Activity centers Suburban parkways Overall architectural concept Overall landscape architectural concept s.s., Subarea Structure In an attempt to provide individual district identity, the planning area has been segmented into four distinct sub- areas. Each subarea contains an activity center or focal point, such as a concen- tration of urban oriented specialty uses, which is intended to increase the "image- ability" of each individual subarea. These separate subarea identities will promote a sense of place for the residents and visitors to the Specific Plan area, and will ultimately enhance property values. 5.5.2 Activity Centers Each subarea within the planning area is punctuated by an urban oriented activity center. Typically located at major inter- sections, these activity centers function to provide a district level focal point which ultimately increases district level density. The activity centers will be composed of urban oriented specialty commercial uses, designed in such a man- ner as to accommodate pedestrian orient- ed activities. Individual structures and large commercial shopping centers will be designed in such a manner as to promote an urban oriented "Rancho Winery Revival" theme complemented by higher intensity built forms. 6112/81 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 1 1 1 1 1 UPM^I PCYM v ~~ i r~,'..n~...... I.n H' r~iwrµinnPN~ CITY o-II+TMNV.o. T7* NP Y IMM M/raY wYP. uT ,n.~.T~!w~Y•?~Yfwr•r~ fro-an~e 4=NS/MMY 441P 1rfMT ~ R 1T M/NTM f1'IRPW~~ m~'MR T f+Ir ~T ~~ W T n~lt N~+r Irt fKY I~`%~w /'T m1Rix r^!R'WM Inw 1IM' ~M. Mr1R /~~MT~. NA"s r•w N/ 1nRT~' IT M nl~fl /M>'RIN1~ I~R. ~ I b M~NG~M~~I'-'U~~ J~ pY/Y»'N l-/O/'Jl/v S. /AtrWj 4N'O NrYw HYT f ~lRTf .Ym~!rvP4M~ rMM( MPn«~ NM•I/~+ ---- •mR.. T1RT M..NvN. TTY ,...~. m,»R-nw m»N ~~..m.wn ~.y„w .«. .TS ? ~Kfrfo rw .~ Nw-rn r...w w.. ~r..rr ~.'m~TMTJ~ r.«n,rn-x~..,...~ .~,-M,Tr n.,.w.n. «Trw.. MI~NMVT T~'!'IrMIN avMM }r+V [o~.,~y'R/jir M~AR.YIfP RnTw~ rM~~vvn+ MN T'MW fIW 1w T •RV4'!wM' MM L,w~~ NP!'wgP MO W T"~"`^~I.u' Yr~M. aA) PVtIIG RIpRI- „_w„ ~,~, ~ rr cv~rwv Tyade Nrrrnfv- ~~ R..n rRRw ~ .r.~aw F Nr i rwlNN ftwTnn+.F Tr rom M M/.vr Nw•. Mn.w Mw~ MTP ~ w+'+rN w.r /nraRNn~~ I v. aircv~nnsw NraGv ir. 11T P.w« NYM ryIPYnYns ';tip MMJ Rnu NN.1+F JryTR I~wTIIo I ~ ~M'P V9'~w/ 181/~'~'/~9U ~Mh'. ~~I~ 9. UPr,7+- ~MP'q'H'm'?N~eos nrlw n HM• row I......rv ~Rnw^ rw+s? PA"PnAN /MI~TT9. MMTI~YY.I ~'~uuq~ 1 w wN T FRS+/~TPJ. ~. ~[L'N~~TK vN ~/'ef~N. Nnu~ \\Y I 'nvro n+IPr. ~'MRf ?unrv 1 TJ M 4FY4M w/ fTMJ~ M / i b. iTNO G50 uM/YPa~ av.i.;-n. .er. e.r rv i.w<.e ACTIVITY CENTER CONCEPT 6112187 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT 5.5.3 Suburban Parkways Suburban parkways will be designed to link individual activity centers. The _ parkways will be designed with informal clusters of trees and rolling turf berms, _ which evoke pastoral, suburban oriented. qualities. ~,~ rro i ~~ ~OMhe~ ii°''' ~' Y:MV.V rvMY- ' 6112187 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT t 1 1 s.s.o Overall Architectural Can t The overall architectural concept is characterized by architectural elements which complement Rancho Cucamonga's heritage. A diversity of architectural styles are allowed within the corridor, rather than one specific style, in an effort to promote a richness of archi- tectural character. While no specific architectural theme is required, "Rancho Cucamonga Heritage" architectural styles such as California Barn, winery, mission agriculture character are encouraged. uNOfc enea~ n..a,a or.m.E .na. a .:ie. u. Vf MICVL EN OVF NEEION• ~NINe •,IQe .nIJ In0 CITE ~~ il.lll[ En11n„r~~ EIUE W.IL.E• VINO'. •Ilvn n.Iri EINO.u,n.J .en,l.l.. 5.5.5 Overall Landsrape Architectural Coneeot The Landscape Concept for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor proposes the use of a specific palette of trees in designated areas, designated to reinforce both urban and suburban architectural features. The activity centers will distinguish from suburban parkway areas to the use of formal urban oriented tree plantings except as noted in Bear Culch. These formal tree plantings will border all activity centers and will define these areas as being higher intensity urban oriented districts. Informal plantings will provide a casual backdrop to suburban parkway areas which lie between activity nodes (see graphic). The informal plantings will be located between activity centers in order to relate to these lower intensity suburban transition areas. In addition, the overall landscape concept shall incorporate a mixture of landscape and hardscape features using native materials. 6(12(87 COMMUNITY DESIGN CONCEPT -V..... _1 _ ?~ ~_ N(4.4y~ ~ IIIYLHN~T ~ (M'[5'Vl :A4M(N JLEiY' ~ ~ C ~R4/v .~ Q w a t~ z o~ w ~ l w . ,~ ~ ._ r~-- ~, ~ ~ J W % Q ~ 7 Z F W W¢~ Oa¢ W i0< Z fY.1Jt6 W~~W~ V N ~tllt~= L ~( rzZ~r m W z J O >j~_3 ~inOWO Ua~aLL d~~~• ~J~-~~ 0 _~- _.. „ n _ .:. ~' r' til _ . ~~ __ . o .~~ ~~_ ~ ''1 ~~~~ _ ; ~ , i 1- a W V O W O 5c tO V U U~;W~ Z~~~ Z -~ mWZJ ~_?~~~ ~inOWO UN~¢LL Q~~~• ~,' ~~ ~~-_-: 5~ i ''O++ V ~~ -~ - _ `~ y - `~ ~~' ~ ~~~~I ,, ~ \ \ ~\ ~ ~\ ~ ~ a "v~ U H 2 ~ ~ 'i Fri W ; ~_ 2 O __ -. ~ S W (~ J .i ~__. _ I ! Z a_ ~ a ~_a y = V mom, 3 ~ ~ _+ `~ z ~ ~ ~n i~ O 7 ~ v w i F ~': h ~ "I fw..w vy w ~, woaaa~ ' 7 Z`¢o20~ is .• ~~aiwLLS ~~ ~~J JJILJ . ~ z¢UUU U rl ~~a is 0a ~ '~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ? ,1 x ~~ • ~' ~•\. ~i as xdX3~ -m ~ ~r~ :~:Yl}!1l1° n n n ~ ~ 7^'.'~ ~ 'l~'t'lYl~'Y~ ~~ :l --~- 2 } w Q ~ 3 y < am<< 0 zN~` Z Q <m~ M~ mZJ LL ~W< ~Of 7 m ~<Q =f~= N~~• W ~> W Q ~, < Z J < ~ C m ¢U t W WaUU F..Yj VIZ Zv~m<y 2 Wmwzy< Fr<Fa U W,fJWW ~vUJWO i S=?vi T<Qtl1G ..~U> 2 J Ow J~rWO< ~" < 2 F-m$~J< v~W~-'w U~eN~a Q~e~~• Py,~~ ~ f~t~~ a :' 1 n ;7 I ;~ -, -1 ~~ -~~. ~~ n~ `yy}~l f~~17 ~)r1~U\?9 cn ~ ~ nk~ F^i'~'? ;~'.I~;~ . ~: 1~ 7 "~ ~~1~ - ~~~ 1_.-~ .~ ~N~~ ~ ~'~~ ~: ._ .~ , - ~ ~-~--i ~ ~i,>'I ~. W ¢ ~- U>G~N N y<JW6O U~ UJWa<N <_ W< W < U w J a W Um~aUmOJmI W J~~WZZ<< NZU<¢mOc ~Z«JFSC.J< F <mc JYl7LLa2 ~¢ma<z¢ovoi ~wa~<OZJW f-. ow¢m>omo NW~-OR<J~W (~ raaW~7<aa Q ~• •~• •• ~z OC W F- Z W U ~- z<~~w ~<g~ao ~ ~~S,Wia ~ {)mot V «Ld<>C ~ M~N~ a ~° 3 ~y_1<~_ ~W~66 ~~~ p¢tnW ago:gW W yp`. Z ~d=<F /Y V<el>~ LWL ooan2 r WZVnd =J@t0 Wv=4WW _<_T.O c~ 2 U 1 1 1 1 t 6.0 LAND USE CONCEPT 6.1 INTRODUCTION The Specific Plan Component Section includes a variety of individual component plans which define the overall framework for development within the planning area. Major components include: o Overall Land Use Concept o Land Use Categories and Types o Subarea Structure o Vehicular Circulation Concept o Community Design Concept o Implementation The intent of these concept plans is to describe, in detail, various planning con- cepts related to the items listed above, in order to outline an evolution or process designed to transform broad-brushed goals, objectives, and policies into specific design and development regul- ations. The concept plans are in direct response to the various implementing policy section. 6.2 OVERALL LAND USE CONCEPT The Overall Land Use Concept is based on the concept of dividing the planning area into four major subareas; all of which should be punctuated 6y higher in- tensity urban activity centers. Subareas were determined by various environmental features; such as topography, recent de- velopment patterns, architecture, blight, physical form, and circulation routes. The activity centers are designed as neighborhoodlsubarea focal points. For example Bear Gulch Village, which already contains a variety of quality sit-down oriented restaurant uses, provides an overriding "restaurant row" theme which is unique to its subarea. Other subareas within the planning area also wntain concentrations of unique land uses which foster the potential to create and strengthen higher intensity activity centers. Specific land uses within the planning area also contribute to the diversity of the planning area. As is evident when viewing the Overall Land Use Plan, the Nlo„~d„y a,~e w~duh~a a qtr ,, a uses ranging from higher Vintensity wm- mercial oriented uses; such as conven- ience, specialty, and regional related commercial designations, to residential uses. Other land uses include office, light industrial, and public oriented uses. Related to these land uses are their accompanying Development Standards (see Section 9.0) which provide the necessary setbacks and landscaping to buffer the adjacent properties. See the 6verall Land Use Plan Map. ' 06/12/87 LAND USE CONCEPT 1 1 1 6.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES The planning area has been designed as composite of various individual land use zones which provide a rich texture and diversity to the community. Specifically, these Land Use Categories consist of the following components: 6.3.1 Commercial The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area contains a variety of commerciai facilities which are designed to promote diverse and unique shopping environments. The planning area contains a wide assemblage of commercial land use categories which range from tourist oriented specialty uses to regional associated commercial uses, In general, commercial land uses within the planning area range in size and character, based upon their respective relationship to location, type, and intensity o' use. Commercial land use categories include: 6,3.1.1 Specialty Commercial (SCI Specialty Commercial Land Use Districts dc~i-nc' - ..~.. a ... .. ~Y~ tr uses, which promote~~a~lspecial lala=dmark quality or create a special ambience, which is unique to a particular subarea, For example, specially uses such as farmers markets, cafes, bakeries, gift shops, and other specialty theme oriented uses located adjacent to the Thomas Brothers Winery, complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme. Other specialty uses, such as the establishment of tourist oriented specialty uses (sit-down restaurants, specialty shops!, lend support to the establishment of a theme oriented activity center which raters to 5't^ 0!her sped a!ty commercial'lacti vity centers include the Archibald and Vineyard intersections, all of which include uses designed to en- hance the character of these respective subareas. A limited number of office uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate an inter-active office/commercial environment. 6.3.1.2 Community Commercial ICCI This land use district includes a wide variety of uses which typically include drug stores, supermarkets, apparel shops, variety stores, and commercial recreation uses. In general, Community Commercial Districts function to promote the estab- lishment of neighborhood/district level commercial goods and services. Typically, large community commercial complexes are designed to accommodate the needs of more than one neighborhood or subarea and include one or more major tenants accompanied by a variety of multi-tenant uses. Smaller, stand alone community commercial facilities are also permitted within various CC districts, located on smaller existing parcels, designed to accommodate smaller satellite land uses, °~ I ~ ., k 06!12/87 LAND USE CONCEPT 6.3.1.3 Regional Related Commercial IRRC) The Regional Related Commercial land category is primarily designed to acwmmodate large regional related commercial uses such as hotel/motel complexes, junior department stores, major appliance stores, commercial recreation uses, home improvement centers, major entertainment facilities, and other regional related commercial establishments. The intent of the Regional Related Commercial District is cater to a veritable mix of uses which are designed to: Promote day and night-time patronage; Complement it's regional location adjacent to the I-15 Freeway Corridor; and Attract patrons from surrounding market areas. 6.3.2 Residential use to A variety of residential land uses are proposed for this olanninn area wltV, predominance of these uses being located within higher intensity residential dis- tricts. Residential land uses range from low density residential ILRI districts, accommodating 2-4 dwelling units per acre, to medium high residential (MHR) districts, encompassing 14-24 dwelling units per acre. In general, the residential land use districts within the planning area are designed to: Provide a populationltrade base for adjacent Commercial Activity Centers; o Provide unique and distinct urban oriented residential environments; o Provide a variety of residential densities and housing product types; o Promote a mixed use development concept in specified locations which integrates urban oriented residential uses with commercialloffice functions; and o Promote residential districts which are compatible with existing adjacent, residential neighborhoods. 6.3.2.1 Low Density Residential ILRI In general, Low Density Residential land uses are characterized by a density of 2- 4 dwelling units per acre of land and consist of residential product types which include single-family detached residential structures. 6.3.2.2 Low Medium Density Residential (LMR Low Medium Density Residential land uses are typically characterized by residential duplexes, triplexes, and fourplex units This land Use District, located near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, is intended to provide higher intensity residential uses designed to complement it's Haven Avenue setting. Low Medium Density Residential uses will be designed to remain compatible with existing, surrounding Single-Family Residential land uses. Typically, Low Medium Density Residential land uses are characterized by a density of 4-8 DU/AC. 06/12/87 LAND USE CONCEPT 6.3.2.3 Medium Density Residential (MR) Medium Density Residential Districts are designed to accommodate product types which are characterized by a density of 8-14 dwelling units per acre. In general, Medium Density uses are associated with attached townhome units with enclosed garages coupled with common recreational amenities. 6.3.2.4 Medium Hioh Density Residential (MHRI Medium High Density Residential Districts consist of densities which range between 14-24 dwelling units per acre. Medium High Residential products are typically associated with attached apartments and condominium projects, designed to exhibit urban qualities including reduced building setbacks, hardscape elements and common open space amenities. 6.3.3 Office 101 There are three types of office land use categories located within the planning area designed to provide varying levels of Office Land Use Districts include: Office, Commercial/Office, and Mixed Use. 6.3.3.1 The Office 101 Land Use District is intended to accommodate professional/ administrative office and personnel services as opposed to other commercial oriented land uses. Typically, uses consist of executive, management, admin- istrative, or clerical uses including the establishment of branch offices, data processing centers and the provision of consultation establishments of a nrnfe55innal netpr?. 6.3.3.2 Commercial/Office (CD) land uses consist of activities which cater to business support and personal services. Uses typically include medical and health care clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, copy centers, and other like land uses. 6.3.3.3 Mixed (MU) activities consist primarily of a mix of high intensity residential uses. coupled with the establishment of convenience oriented sales and services. Typically, uses include high intensity residential land uses of 8-t4 units per acre and neighborhood oriented community commercial uses such as retail sales from the premises of frequently needed personal items (i.e., dry cleaning establishments, specialty markets, video rental outlets, cafes, sit-down restaurants, book/magazine stores, hair stylists, etc.l. Each Mixed-Use/Retail site shall provide a master plan illustrating land use, site planning, circulation, access, and overall architectural and landscape architectural design concepts Isee Development Regulation Section IV1. 06/1Z/S7 LAND USE CONCEPT t 6.3.E Industrial (LI) In general, the Industrial Land Use District Is characterized by Llgbt Industrial (LI) land uses which typically Include Ilght manufacturing, custom manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, wholesaling coupled with Itmited office/ administratve fu nctfons. 6.3.5 Utility (U) Quasi-Public land uses are typically associated with public act Hlties. Quasl- Public land uses typically consist of civic functions such as public administrative offices, public museums, libraries, and public meeting halls/neighborhood centers. Quasi-public activities are also associated with public utility administrat We offices and utility fu nctlons. 6.3.6 Public (P) Public land uses are typically associated with public transportation facilities and rights of way. 06/12/87 LAND USE CONCEPT 1 1 1 1 1 A raised landscaped median has been a part of the Foothill Boulevard Master Plan since adoption of the General Plan in 1981. The median system is designed to maintain the highest level of service possible on a street whose very capacity is going to be severely taxed. The enhancement of traffic flow and safety through the attainment of the lowest possible level of conflict among vehicles is essential to achieving the necessary service level. In order to preserve the level of service on Foothill Boulevard, access to commercial properties should be via the median breaks at signalized intersections, with off-street, internal circulation to be provided to serve the properties between intersections. If will also be necessary to accept an increased number of U- turns ae the remaining intersections to reduce the greater friction caused by more frequent median openings. Any median break on a street with such high volume must be signalized for safety and when signals are placed less than approximately 700 feet apart, the speed at which progressive traffic movement can be obtained falls below an acceptable level. cast-west arterieis in lire City wilt have to be capable of two-way progressive traffic service for a large part of the day. For these reasons, no median break has been planned, for example, at Red Hill Country Club Drive, san Diego Avenue, or K lusman Avenue. Klusman Avenue is only 520 feet from Malachite Avenue, an important future intersection, and is at a questionable distance of 670 feet from Archibald Avenue. The necessary left- turn lanes for median breaks eliminate median planting and when such breaks are close together, reducing the aesthetic value of the median and its visibility. This creates the possibility of traffic from driveways attempting to make left turns, not realizing a median exists. Alternate median breaks may be considered subject to a detail traffic safety analysis and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. The following pages depict the Center Median Program. ' 06!12!87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT 1 7.0 CIRCULATION CONCEPT Foothill Boulevard is currently the prin- cipal east-west arterial through Rancho Cucamonga. West of Haven Avenue, dev- elopment is fairly intense. This devel- opment places constraints on the ultimate roadway cross-section that can be achiev- ed. Currently, it is a five lane cross- section (two lanes eastbound, two lanes westbound and a center striped left-turn medianl. Traffic volumes are about 20,000 vehicles per day. A Southern Pacific Rail Road street overcrossing just west of Vineyard is also a major wn- straint to widening beyond the existing four travel lanes. East of Haven Avenue, ultimate right-of-way width on Foothill Boulevard, is less constrained as fronting properties are largely undeveloped. From Haven Avenue to East Avenue, it is cur- rently about 12,000 to 15,000 vehicles a day. The roadway treatment for Foothill Boul- evard will play a significant role in the ability of this facility to accommodate the circulation needs of Rancho Cucamonga. For example, Foothill Boulevard is cur- rently arelatively high speed arterial roadway (45 mphl, traversing the City from aacl •n wne~ De ~~L i• _ an alternative to the San-Bernardino J Freeway (I-101 for trips east, towards San Bernardino and west, towards Los Angeles. It will remain the predominant alternative route to the Interstate Free- way i-10, unlit the Foothill freeway is built. Therefore, capacity is the number one priority for Foothill Boulevard if the facility is to maintain reasonable levels of service for both through and local traffic. Increasing capacityllevel of service can be accomplished by major facility widen- ing. However, this alternative is con- strained at the western end of the City due to existing development. Other methods of increasing capacity include raised medians signal coordination (pro- gressive timing), semi-actuated signals, lane restripping, and limiting access to the facility. 7.1 CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS Existing conditions and future trends in- dicate that significant increases in vehicular traffic will occur along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. In an effort to minimize possible future traffic liabil- ities, the following circulation related actions are rewmmended. 7.1.1 Center Median Program Based upon traffic analysis, a 14 foot, wide landscaped raised/center median on Foothill Boulevard can provide those benefits necessary to accommodate in- creased development and traffic demand. TL. l ... LII:,.:iAy :iciicfii~ wn uc ,eaiiaeu with the implementation of a raised center median program: Increased vehicular capacity Increased vehicular/pedestrian Increased vehicular mobility Increased h safety ve icular level of service 06/12/Y,7 CIRCULATION CONCEPT p n ~> 0 Z 0 I~ n m _--_~ ~' I ~~ I V a a [ ~ L'S1:pL'G G.LSA ~~, .xr~ ,`., 1 ~ '~`~q', ~~~~r=~~~ ~' ~~ ~L' ~9 ray ,~ _, = ~: ~ a C , 'I o~ ,'~ ~ ~. ~ ,__ __~• Fem. ~_ _c_ \, ~ ~,, v~a °J IC, C~ ~ ", Imo` L ~~~~~ I ~~ ~ ~ ^~ - - ~~-- °~~ ~ ~~ u ~CCLCeC~ cwt' ~1 ,o o ~ 3 „ v 'm a 1~M o ~ - ._ I¢ D ~ I .~ _- - o ~~ o-o Z ~ 4 W ~ ~ ~ J I fry ~ ~ ~ -~. ~~ i '~~~,n '~ ~ 000~~1 I' v~ i ~ ~ o-'~ ~; °~,~ ~~ _ _~' ~~ ~~ -__v m~m ~ ! O ~j~~ !. ~Lla _ J ~~ O ' PC i ~ ~~J~~ i -tom ;: ~ is 1, ~ .~ ~. ~ _J :~~~ :.~. s a z 0 a v 0 J Z O W _ m o o o - a W y ; ~ I ~ ~ -'''', }~ ~I ~ _. - a ~ ,, t7 d ri' ~' ~ n' ~~ I R - y _ e n ~-N _~ ~ _ ~~ n a = s~ 2 G ~ ^ ~ o ~ - ~ '~ -- ----'- 6em~ _ - s ~ ~~" 4I ~~ ~ - ~ J. ~_ rS, °Ua~a ~ o emu,-. o ~m~~`~o - ----- - _~~~~~ a Z ~_ F" Q U O J Z Q O cw G n S s -.. _ ~':~ - ~ _-- : c - ~c~2 FFcG~~C~cCec~ccoon G~ ~' ~ - - L`~G f {~gPScra ~ ° oGC~UGGO`r; ~ ~bepG9DfI„if', ',~ ~~~ '~~, V ^ + G E ' '.~, ° ~"r.. _ =_- ---c -~:c_ -- ^~ -- ~ a ~.~__ i _ ~~x ~e ~ C ~t, m 0 D Z r O n D ~_ O z D 'D ® ~~ ~,~i .. -.`\\^ ` g\ ~- ~L I E ,f'a I r iaL m r. ~ Z _ - o m o ~, n a 6 ~.t.~ Access Control Program ' Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel ' configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by rousing increased side fric- ' Lion. A recanmended program of access controls, wnaistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, Isuch as right- ' in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the following: ' o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and ' o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. -'~ ~~,- ~ ~ ~ ~I Redblll Redlynment ~~~ u~ ~ 'i d ~ 06/12187 CIRCULATION CONCEPT 7.1.3 Red Hill Real'wnment Currently, Red Hill intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will 6e realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selected alignment is shown on this page. r~• ~ _ ---~ ~ ~ fl,~ I i ~~'~ 1 I ~ ~~ ~b 1 ~.Ls San Bernardino Road Aligmnent San Bernardino Road currently merges with Foothill Boulevard at an acute angle which promotes vehicular conflicts with autos traveling east bound along Foothill Boulevard. In an effort to remedy this situation, San Bernardino Road will be realigned in order to forma "t" intersection with Foothill Boulevard. The "t" intersection will be aligned with the Sycamore Inn entrance driveway and traffic signal. ~s -its=`~ ~ ~~' ~~ ~ i I '~ ~___; , , w -- - -_ - ,..'..~. .~ p~',~". '~ L1r 9^ ~~~~~~I~~ ~ ~ ;; ~I ~ JAI +'d~ ~=I I¢/ I 06!12/87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT 1 1 1 T.1.5 Hellman-Klusman Block Circulation Master Plan A circulation master plan in wnjunction with a detailed trafficJcirculation analysis shall be developed with any future development proposals for the entire block in order to determine the following issues: o Access to San Bernardino Road It is the intent of this Specific Plan in discourage d(ract access and through non-residential traffic from Foothill or on site to San Bernardino Road. The ultimate circulation master plan must show the necessity for access to San Bernardino Road and the ultimate on sites circulation configuration and improvemenes. o Access Points The arrows depicting access point are shown in order to limit access onto Foothill and Klusman and are located at points opposite existing roadways or future traffic signals. o Interior Circulation A suggested interior circulation pattern is illustrated by dashed lines. It is not the intent to require public streets but rather to show a conceptual alignment which may be in the form of private drives/aisles and streets. _~ ~ -- , , ~~~ aa~._~ t~~n , - ~ ~ ~l( ;w J W< S - - -~_ ~~ -E8TACIA r sr. L _ ~l~ 31 ~~ YL ~r~ ^~ W U~ < t I 06/12/87 CIRCULATION CONCEPT 1 DEVELOPMENT PART 111 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 1 1 8.0 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 8.1 INTRODUCTION These General Design Guidelines and Development Standards address the archi- tectural, landscape architectural and site development requirements that will create a quality environment for Foothill Boulevard. The desired community character of the Foothill Boulevard, is called Rancho Cucamonga heritage. It is a mix of a number of design elements of which the predominant types reflect the Rancho Winery or Mission styles of architecture The City of Rancho Cucamonga values its historic background related to the wine industry. The City seeks to preserve the special qualities embodied in its heritage. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to make use of the rich and varied palette of historic elements, com- bined with quality workmanship, that will ensure commercial and aesthetic success. Aii new deveiupnieni in iire Spe~ii i~ pieu area must comply with the overall outside lines contained herein and subarea Development Regulations (Part V) to receive Planning Commission approval. The overall Guidelines are used by the City as a basis for review of all projects Proposals that do not address these guidelines will not receive City approval. ^ 8.1.1 Consistenw with the General Plan The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is intended to 6e consistent with all the elements of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Specific Plan includes policies, guidelines, standards, regulations, and implementing actions (which are more precise actions) for various policies of the General Plan. The Foothill Corridor is a unique setting, and the policies and regulations contained herein are meant to guide the future of only this area, within the context of the City's General Plan. Nothing in this Specific Plan should be construed to be in conflict or modify the General Plan. Actions under the jurisdiction of this Specific Plan and City General Plan must be found consistent with both documents. 8.1.2 Relationship to Other Regulrtions The Specific Plan will contain most of the information needed to guide the development of a particular parcel within iiw aiuuy ei ca. I' ~ m , .,P~aS r~ specifically coveredV by, this Plan will continue to be governed by existing City regulations, and no provision of this Plan is intended to repeal, abrogate, annul, impair, or interfere with any existing City ordinance except as is specifically repealed by adoption of this plan. 8.1.3 Conflict with Other Regulations Whenever the provisions of this Plan impose more restrictive regulations or otherwise establish more restrictive regulations than are imposed or required by any other city ordinance, code or regulations, the provision of this plan shall govern. BAPN srr'e0 TO{NE~9 ~~ GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6!12/67 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a.l.s Relationship to the Rancho Cucanongs Developaent Code This Specific Plan augments the develop- ment regulations and standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. When an issue, condition, or situation occurs which is not covered or provided for in this Specific Plan, the regulations of the Development Code that are most applicable :o the issue, condition, or situation shall apply. In the event that the provisions of the Specific Plan are in conflict with the Development Code, the provisions of the Specific Plan shall prevail. 8.1.5 Enforcenent The City Planner shall enforce the pro- vision of this Specific Plan and all the applicable codes of all governmental agencies and jurisdictions in such matters including, but not limited to, building, mechanical, fire and electrical codes, codes pertaining to drainage, waste water, public utilities, subdivisions and grading. 8.1.6 Uennrtions Words, phrases and terms not specifically defined herein shalt have the same definition as provided in the Development Code. s.l.~ Severability If any regulation, condition, program or portion thereof of the Specific Plan is for any reason held invalid or unconsti- tutional by any court of competent juris- diction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent pro- vision and the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. 8.1.8 Interpretation The City Planner or his/her designee, shall have the responsibility to interpret the provisions of the Specific Plan. All such interpretations shall be in written form and permanently maintained. Any person aggrieved by such an interpret- ation may request that such interpretation be reviewed by the Planning Commission. 8.1.9 Ambiguities Unless otherwise provided, any ambiguity concerning the content or application of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan shall ue i~~im pi eieu uy ii ~e Ciiy rianuc,. 8.1.10 Agreanents The provisions of this Plan are not intended to interfere with or abrogate any easements, covenants, or other exiting agreements which are more restrictive than the provisions of this Pian. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6/12/a7 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS E,2 GENERAL GUIDELINES Thera are key design elements which con- tribute significantly to the overall visual impact of a community. These include landscape design, architecture, and site planning criteria. This section addresses each of these elements in general terms and establishes the guidelines which can be used and expanded upon in more detail through the site planning process. 8.2.1 Entrance to the City Entrance monumentation will be provided at major entry points along the Foothill Corridor, designed to announce entrance into the planning area. 1 !~ !f ^ The entry will promote a clear sense of "progression" and transition into the City, rather than act as an abrupt edge, by placement of similar elements, such as street trees and light poles along each side of the street, or in the center median. CITY ENTRY SIGN Rancho Cucamonga entry signs will be coordinated with Caltrans or placed outs- side of the public right of way. Entry signs will capitalize on the Rancho Cucamonga heritage which features such design features as arbors, vines, wood, river-wash cobble, and architectural features reminiscent of historical buildings. An ideal location for the entry signage is in the proposed roadway median, however, locations outside of the right of way are recommended due to the material and size constraints imposed by Caltrans. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6112187 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a.z.z Site Planning o At activity centers place building at or adjacent to front setback line to ' create more appealing, actWe streetscape. Front yard setbacks with parking lots dominating the street scene are speciflcaliy ' prohibited. Aiorg the wbu roan parkways It is ' encouraged to place buildings on the forty-five foot front setback line and avoid large sections of parking lot frontages at the setback line. i ,. ~ ~ ;. - ~ , ,:_• ~ ' o In situations where buildings are highly visible from side streets and/or adjacent parking areas, blank walls shall be prohibited and special emphasis placed on creating architectural interest. o Utilize the concept of "tuck under" parking where it Is not visible from Foothill Poulevard or from any other side street. ~~M~7'~No ~~ ~~ ~ ~I, „~°3 'BUILDING LOCATION GENERAL DESIf,N GUIDELINES 6117187 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 0 o In the case of multi-storied build- ings, it is important that they relate to the pedestrian. All ground stow facades shall be designed to relate to a pedestrian scale. This can be accomplished through breaking the facade into bays and the signage brought down in size and location. Pedestrian scale along Foothill Boulevard shall also be established through the use of pedestrian arcades and awnings which add horizontal articulation to facades. lg7CMFyf'PJ Wj ~rN~ FACADE ARTICULATION w~ GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6/[2/87 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS o Design buildings to be visually con- nected in order to eliminate a strip commercial appearance. o Architecture and outdoor space along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience. The experience should be visually diverse, stimulating, and include activities that create a sense of variety and excitement. 1 0 0 Site buildings to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This is accomplished by creating plazas and allowing wider sidewalks on Foothill Boulevard. Site and design buildings to minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and avoid locating driveways and service areas which interfere with the flow of Foothill Boulevard pedestrian movements. Site and design structures to faclii- tate public access across sites where Important pedestriann cons oc- cur. Mld block passageways from rear parking lots can be created through a fully developed Internal paseo system, o Orient lscreen ail auto related facll hies (i.d., working toys, storage, etc.) from public view. o Buildings shall orient their public entrances toward Foothill Boulevard as much as possible. o BI-level landscape buffers shall tx prw lded between different land uses designed to provide transition between high and low intensity land uses. The first twfferirg "level" consists of an eight foot high concrete block wall, The second "level" is dominated by a dense IS foot landscape buffer. ~-y~f~i~1 1 \~``s ~YmY M.'.~.w,w nrrva~. I- 1 / o,r e', rF.KP!Wr'/ OFF 4. Y,r,. ~~,;.~' y . F id~'r: ~ ,.: ~r. ~ , ~; ,. .~ ;mot -.;""~ S~ :~ ;; BI-LEVEL BUFFER GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6/17/87 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS t s.z.. General Materials Palette There are slx categories of architectu rai and landscape architectural elements that will formulate the basis for new develop- ment design for the Specific Plan area. 44hen these elements are Incorporated Into contemporary development designs, the effect will retain Individuality while retaining certain common design elements. ELEMENT 1: Sloping roof (shallow to moderate) Material: Clay barrel file Colors:* Red to brown ELEMENT 2; Walls Material: Stucco (rough textured) Colors:* White, off-white, beige "flat" finish; pale pastel colors M17aterial: Wood Horizontal claptroard or hoard and batten used in horizontal planes f nlnr•"•* ,Iv~k h~,wun - Iin ht hnnwn ELEMENT 3; Accents Material: Tile Colors:* Glazed or unglazed terra cotta ELEMENT 4: Awning Material: Treated camas (plastic laminated) Colors:* Dark preen; reds/blues ELEMENT 5: Pavement Material: Interlocking pavers, and concrete Colors:* Integral color terra cotta ELEMENT 6: Fences/gates Material: Wrought iron Colors:* Painted black, reddish brown, or dark green * These color ranges are examples and are only encouraged to be utilized. GENERAL DESIGN GIIIDELINES 6/12187 AND DEVELGPMENT STANDARDS ' ~~~ ~ ~ ' 9T!/oo0 OoAJ,o b B/YG/~- NYB/- 1 ' 6Aec~ nio vMN srreo Pima fcYJF P+~F ~7F 1 pEiTi~/L6 ~I ..~ ~. ~ I 'o :, - w.vrr_~ rGW£~p .1i~s~i'3 /~1uL'r/ /ildrn ~~J /1'/Nl/GtY~ GENERAL MATERIALS PALETTE GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6/12/87 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 8,2,5 Parking Lots o Whenever possible, locate site en- - tries on side streets in order to minimize pedestrianlvehicular con- , flicts. When this is not possible, design the Foothill Boulevard site entry with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers to differentiate it from sidewalks, ' o Parking access points, whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, should be located as far as possible from street intersections. ' o Design parking areas so that pedes- trians walk parallel to moving cars. 1 Minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles. o Driveways and parking areas should ' be separated from adjacent sidewalks or landscaped areas by a curb not less than four inches high. ' o All parking spaces shall be clearly outlined on the surface of the park- , ing facility. o In activity center locations, locate park mg areas to the rear ui buildings. o Link individual project parking areas ' with on-site driveways which are clearly identified and easily recognized as connectors. o New development projects shall de- lineate on all submittal plans where vehicular connection to adjacent sites are located, The applicant must also demonstrate provisions for access easement for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with an approved master plan. Asa condition of approval, the applicant may be required to combine parking facilities and access to serve more than one individual project. Vehicular circulation through a parking facility should be directed away from the fire lane (adjacent to the rears of stores(, io the outer edge of the parking lot where there is less pedestrian traffic. Within suburban parkways, parking areas should be designed in a manner which links the building to the street sidewalk system, as an extension of the pedestrian environ- ment. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walk- ways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscape treatments. 8.2.6 Landscace Design All sign casements, poles, street furniture, light standards and similar hardware within ten (101 feet of the public right-of-way, shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Cor- .idc~ rtic~_ r•..I,,.; farwc may vary and match the related architecture. Establish a colorful landscape edge at the base of buildings and avoid asphalt edges at the base of struc- tures as much as possible. Plant materials located in containers are appropriate. Landscaping should result in a low profile image, i. e., use of blade grass lawn areas, ('.e., including water conservation practi ceslmeihods and droucht tolerant plant materials) canopy trees in parking areas, use of hedges, and low walls to screen service areas. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6112/87 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1 o Internal pedestrian systems, linking office wmplexes with neighboring commercial or office developments, should be located close to buildings and be partially covered. o Add large 115 gallon to 24" box) canopy trees to existing landscapes consistent with City standards. o On-site plant masses should assume a non-uniform arrangement. The diversity of massing types should be great enough to provide interest, but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural, feeling. o Water conserving irrigation systems shall be used in all public and private landscaping. 8.2.7 Signs o A sign should express an easy to read, direct message: keep it simple. Brand names of merchandise shall not be displayed. A storefront should not have more than two signs -one primary and one secondary. The secondary sign, shall be pedestrian in scale and not visible from motorists on Foothill Boulevard. Signs may identify only the firm name or major enterprise on the premises on which the sign is locat- ed. Material and product advertising shall not be permitted except as primary identification of an estab- lishment. Additional identifying logos of products may be incorporat- ed within the signing but are con- sidered part of the overall allowed sign area. o Temporary signs are regulated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance. o Pedestrian-oriented signs may be applied directly to the face of the building and may not exceed city sign area requirements. The shape of the sign can be a positive feature. o No signs shall extend higher than the ridgeline of the structure. o Window signs should not obscure the display area. The color of the letters should contrast with the display background. Light colored letters or gold leafed letters with dark borders are effective. o All buildings using rear parking lots shall clearly identify their businesses with rear wall signage. All struc- tures shall exhibit clear address in- formation on the front facade; (re- commended guideline: minimum address number size shall be 6" for a 1 story building and 10" fora 2 story building.) for night identifi- cation, the numbers shall be intern- ally or externally lit. Otherwise all signing shall comply with the Rancho Cucamonga Sign Code. Existing billboards are regulated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance and new billboards are prohibited 6y the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance. ' GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6112187 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1 1 1 H.3 STREETSCAPE DESIGN E,3.1 Center Median Island A 14 foot center median shall be provided within Foothill Boulevard designed to provide access control and en unifying landscape statement. The median will incorporate rolling turf berms dominated by Informal clusters of Flowering Plum and Carolina Laurel Cherry trees. See details below and on next page. ~OYPf /Y~/r ~/Wr/tin»' J)HS' flrpr/ Gwla'4i /Miyrew~Nca /1cVls O/"~4~'m' ry/s- roN/?lAekYfv~ nr ,«enMA' /~+ i ~~ AriM~ ~AYiY M~DYV 1rp~ -1 ~O^~'~>z ure T4,h~ ~r / .S~g ~ 17F/ r+L /s ~ nr~•y~.rgxe ieae NsV/.o f/M.,r SCAT/~N ,~ Er,~i~ GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6/12/87 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - ~<°` - -- ~.. ~ _ ~" NW/M- 6N,~y/hN fp V rro^+°wry /A~~irn h~'r rvev c (cP9RS'MjfiLi7 h.4;,~( f-MoW~ rHip ` j ~-on c~.6f°r uwc - , ~ ,{~ ' , ~ p"taro ,w` ~~-'~ x7+'/u~r+ ryx H',un~r arr~ ~ ' ~ '' ~ rd "~ A~Oph'<'N, 77C'"E J~T2Y~t1~-ry~W~ C1LC' ^ y~y` S 4 ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ - j ~ ~ / ~*~~ y TYPICAL MID BLOCK LOCATION r-o ~c rvA~' -~- _ ~ ~. - ~ -- ~---_ ' ' ~~ ---- n~acf~+o aavo ~wnvns s~rre - .__ r__ .... (7, ~I Pi`T2'/.ry aq+^,^<.trv r~gs'f'NrSM - - - ' - __ - - __--+k-A-- Ga~G~9ls .. r ,N.^~ :.. P~hN GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6/12/87 AND DEVELDPMENT STANDARDS K ~ '~ r j ~M ~ F l f___ t F ~'~' _ _ _-_ _-tt i c o ~ ' ~ ~ ____--___ _____F _Y, ___ :__ ___ ___ --__ F S -- c£ _f D- e7~ ~ _ _ _ = r < . _ _ _ __ ,~ - ,~ 1 _ - J;~ ~ f~ _ _ _ _ _ v _ _ _ gE~iit~ ~ t~•~i+' '~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ iE ~ti ~~]1 ~ ~. ,y ~? ~ ~ ~~ i ~ 5 Ii~ + ~~i' ' ~ , ~ -~ , ___ ,~ ~ ~ i ~ ~i, . ,~. ~i' i~ ~;!# z ~~ ~~ ~ i5? 1~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~3 ~~ ~~i} ~ ~ is ~I'~ ~~, Z f ti { I+ _ --_ ____ • 3 i r ~ ,...,:~ ~ ~:x--a ~ 1 s.3.a Streetsrace Furniture This streetscape furniture/material palette depicts the elements to utilized along Foothill Boulevard. NOTE: All furniture that is connected to the sidewalk shall be connected with shear bolts and not have concrete or other footings. This matrix applies to all of Foothill Boulevard. It should be noted that these furniture selection are for future direction only.. It is not intended to be a final selection. The City may want to select other furniture as appropriate and necessary. /r',~/q!/ n~,~~yNS Gp/ ;//p/.N NOJB ~SNG `r /pgy/(y :-/br'r':4e c!av ri,:v Neni/!e Uf/!1/Nb ~~r-N ogrr~i r nar gow,q~ r~° fe/,v rn/r! :sern r~ b~+rt- ~t~~ao TF{.yrf Pfl"EST4.L SIP ~ ~~ ~ !,~~ I~'. ,2~,r?°r~ Fro:crE.~ I:Y'nn F///, PNMJfv FV1P.J "-A'/'Cl~ - STREETSCAPE FURNITURE/MATERIAL PALETTE GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6/12/67 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a.3.5 Streetscape Lighting ' It is the intent of strcetscape lighting to add a consistent, planned Iaok for Foothill Blvd. during daylight hours and ' evening. Lighting can have a dramatic affect on the quality of strcetscape design. ' All Ilghting fixtures in the public right- of-way shall be consistent and approved ' by the City Engineer following the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Materials should be consistent and in keeping with the ' desired theme. Luminaires, poles and wpporting hardware should also be consistent. ' All development areas outside the public right-of-way shall use high preswre sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confined to the limits of the building site. 1 ' GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 6112/87 AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS r PART /V DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ' 9.0 SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATIONS 9.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS This section contains the specialized sub- ' area development regulations for all new development within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. The provisions contained within this section are intended to implement the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan and are tailored to promote the ' goals, objectives, and policies as specified in Section 4; and support all land use and circulation component plans (Section 51. The intent is to establish a distinctive, ' well designed, high quality corridor which reflects the Rancho Cuwmonga's Heritage. There are six major land use categories within the Specific Plan (commercial, re- sidential, office, public and industrial) which are listed below with their ' respective sub-categories. Refer to the Specific Plan Land Use Map to determine the boundaries of each sub-category. ' SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12; a7 AND LAND USE REGULATION 9.1.t Land Use Gtagories There are six basic land use categories within the Specific Plan listed below. Refer to the Specific Plan land Use Map to determine the boundaries of each category. The Land Use Summary Table Ifsts the land use types by Subarea. LAND USE CATEGORIES DESIGNATION Commercial o Specialty Commercial SC o Community Commercial CC o Regional-Related Commercial R-RC Residential: o Low-Density Residential (Z-4 du /ac) LR o Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 du /ac) LMR o Medium Density Residential (8-14 du/ac) MR o Medium-High Density Residential (14-24 du /ac) MHR ofn~e: o Ofnce O n Cnmmercial/Office CO Public/Utility: o Public P o Utility U Industrial: o Light Industrial LI Alixed Use: o Mixed Use/Retail A9U/R ' SUn-AREA OF.SIf,N STANDARDS 6/[2/97 AND LAND 115E REGULATION 1 1 1 9.1.2 Land Use Definitions "Suecialty Retail -This use is typified as small shops and boutiques which specialize in limited product lines of unique and novel designs andlor purposes. Specialty Retail is defined as follows: Any retail business not listed separately in Section 9.3.2, 9.5.2, 9.7.2, and 9.9.2 which limits its sales to product lines of singular purpose or of unique and special design li.e., cutlery shops, small household or personal appliances, kitchenware, novelty gifts, etc. ). Service businesses are not specialty retail use. Limited to a business area of 3,000 square feet totally within an enclosed building." 9.1.3 Master Plans The intent of a master plan is to provide for integrated development at the earliest possible time in the review process through the master plan, there is an opportunity to coordinate the efforts of single or multiple property owners and discourage piecemeal strip commercial development. The following criteria is intended to apply to all projects and should not be constrained to parcel lines of site boundaries. o A conceptual master plan may be required by the City Planner when it is evident that piecemeal development will prevent or produce future development of adjacent properties in a manner not consistent with the intent of this Specific Plan. o A wnceptual master plan shall be submitted for the Planning Commis- sion approval, together with any development proposals and shall address all other parcels as they relate to the master olan. o A conceptual master plan shall contain, as a minimum, the require- ments as set forth in the City Development Gode Section 1720.080. SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 61f7/S7 AND LAND USE REGULATION 1 -- --..._ _ _ ~ : ti ~~~~~] i- CC - i ~ ~~ C_ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~, it ~~ ~ ~J ~~a ~~ ..... MfS < ~' c ~ ~ ~o-~4-ss "'' - eev. s-~o-s~ ~--~c rawaR PEAIIITTm PI® OD~ITIOYi. LNSESf Sukuea One SWrea Two SWrea Three Subuea Fax Retail Csearcial Uses - SC ¢ O IR P SC lI 0 MN SC lI lSl LtR M U ILI 6 RRC IR LI IR Rnfi gpe Shops N N S M ppprelf a) Batipes N S X N S M X N M hl General M% M% S z N N Rppliance Sties utl Repair N X S S S ht, 1lfsic, aM Photographic StWios antl Supply Sties N % S % % X S X % Xa Ptnl etic mtl Neal to 6yua aM weight Retlucuq Clinics X O % O % 0 0 X za Buto Smvice s~atim 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wto Service linclutlin9 eotxcycles, hwts, trailms, caAersl: a) Sales Iwith ancilluy repair) 0 0 0 0 m RmtaS a o G B B [1 Mirror Repair Idces rwt include ujw engine work, uf{lm shops, poi nttrg, had work, upholstmy, etc,) O 0 0 0 0 dl Coin-ap Wshing 0 0 el Wtowatic Mashanq 0 0 fl Puts ud Supplies N N % % % Bakmies (retail mlyl X X % N X S z N X N Brher and Bewty Slwps X z z N N N N%% X N Sa BM 6 Breakfast 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Bi cytle 4wps X S M N N M X N• Blueprint antl Photocopy Services X z N S X N N % M Book, 6ik, and Statimuqq Sties % N X lathe than adult rel aketl aeteriall X N S X X X % S S Candy afM Cmlecttmutes X z X X S z z % N Xa Catering Estaolishemts X X X X X % fhina and 6l assware Stares X % N % X X X Na Chrf Stws free Sales Lots lapmattng m a teepxry basis) % X X S UxrneS G B o B S B G B o B B Cl eanf~; and Presz: rq Establtshants S% N N N X N X M N Laktatl Lange Ihu, lunge, tavern) mclud: ng related mtertam~nt B O B D O 0 0 0 0 0 Cawwerual Recreati m: al Indoor uses wch as bawl mg and 6tllards 0 0 0 O B 0 0 hl Outdox uses stKh as tennis one hasketbal! 0 0 0 0 0 B 0 Cmval escort Faulrt: rs and Hospitals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Curtain one Orapxv Ghops X X N X X % X Day Lue Craters 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 G 0 Ilelicatessms aM Spmfalty Food Sixes S N X J X N N X X %a Drug Sties and Pharuct es N X N % N % Farems Markets N S X S M Flax Covering ShppS X X 1 X X Float Shops N z S N N S N N N X ~ N PETMII TTED Alm CONDITIQLY IL4S: 1 1 4>)-nJ Subarea Rie Subarea Two Subxea Three Subarea Fm Entmtaineent and Cultural Uses - SC CC D MR P SC CC 0 IaIF SC CC CO CIR fA U MU CC RRC lfl LI If1 Arcades D U 0 0 D D D 0 Cultural/Mist Exhibits: al Indoor gallery aixl art sales X 0 X X U M X bl Outdoor art exhibits T O X 0 X D D Di scothepies D D D 0 D 0 U D TAeatms: al Di nnm theatre O D D D D D D D bl Movie theater O D D D 0 OFfice and Adxi nist-atirx Uses - Subarea One 5C CC D tIR F Subarea Txo SC CC 0 I/F Subarea Than SC CC CO LMV MA U MU Subarea Fow CC ANC IIR LI MF Addl nt 5trdtl Ver [A15111e55: dnd Professimat Dllice X % X % X % % X % % X Xa Banks, Fi naiKe Smvices 6 Institutims - without drivrtNu - wi to drive-thru Y X% D 0 O X X X O O 0 X% O D X D 0 O % D X D Pasiness and Dlfice Services % X X X Y M M % InM is Decorating Fira X% X X N Y Y X X X Medical/Dental WFi ces and flelated Neal th Clinics X% X % X % X 0 X X3 Optician and Optaaetri cal Shops Y A% y Y X X D % Xa Realtors and Real Estate 0//ices X Y% X X M X X X X X Xa Travel Agencies X X X X X y y X y X X N• Subarea One Subarea Two Suhazea Three Subarea Fmr Residential Uses - SC CC 0 MR F SC CC 0 Mllfl SC CC CD LMR M U t1J fC AAC MF ll IIR Single fawily Detached X X % T M Single Fuily Attached Idup l e;;~ triPl ex, fowpi eel % X X X X X X Molt rfanily Dwellings Y Y X Y Y v Anu llarY Pesidmti al Uses: al None-care faulrties It ^r lessl X M Y X X F X bl On-si to private recreation 4au li ti es X X X X X Y X Accessmy ilses: ai Accessory structures k X X X X X Y. bi Hoae atop alien Y X y N X Y Y Fubi¢ Use= - subarea Che SG CC O flF F Subarea Tx^ SC CC D MNA Subarea Tnree SC CC r,0 LMS fF: 6~ MU ~ Subarea Fwr CC RRC MR LI MF transit Fanlrt ies Public Utility Installatims X Subarea One Subarea Txe Subarea Three Subarea fwr Indu stn al Usee - ~ 5[ CC O MA F ~ Sr CC D MAI ~ SC CC CD LNP IR U 10.1 ~ LC APC MR LI MF 1 PFleIITTED alb fD~ITIIlgL IL4Sr LJ]-M ALYH LII! SWZN Tlq SIIDYN TDIR SIDYN FW Hotel Uses - 50 CL 0 tP f SC CC 0 IFF SC CC W l1F IF U lu CL MtC Mt LI IR lull/ttltll ~ % Hotel facilities lriorl % Mcf ilary Ures: al lkwty/&rbsr Shop % DI Gles % cl Catering Services 0 dl Cocktail Large 0 el Conference/Convention facilities 0 Fl Florist Shops % hl Hewspaper/HSguine Stores ~ l M Hestaurnts tsit doanl j % kl Tairist IMQUtion M I) Travel Agncies % 9.2 SUBAREA ONE -- DESIGN ' l.2.7 Background 1 Subarea One Is the least "linear" subarea within the Specific Plan boundary. Land uses currently corer spectrum of intensi- ties, from single-family to madium- density residential structures, as well as office end commercial uses. Because of the variety of existing land uses, and the future emphasis on spec laity commercial uses, it Is logical to delineate this area as a "village." A large portion of this "village" is physically removed from the remainder of Foothill Boulevard by a railroad trestle bridge and a large natural land form (Red H111) In the central portion of the subarea. The Sycamore Inn and Magic Lamp rest- aurants are the most architecturally dls- tinctWe buildings in the Brea. TFxir location and proximity to one another prw ides the basis for the activity center of "Bear Gulch". The scale of these restaurant structures will keyrxrte fulu re architectural Mrmony for Bear Gulch Village. Other 6ulidirgs are not as architecturally significant. Significant amounts of sycamores are frond in this subarea, as well as a proliferation of the use of rNer rock in a number of structures. Many negative aesthetic features exist in this Brea as well. Least-appealing is outdoor storage visible from Foothill Boulward. -on. "e.w,n.e ao,w.:, co..w.e.b wxrene,n.;, . "".n,. no a.+..i wr w.ccur ___ "nmw a,w.u o.y. ,son . . os Nwo.~~es .w". • ,.. ",. nose~n w O ~¢jI ~W ~'~~., s~a.~,°ean..~u , ~.n uw.... ~ ~ ~ ~ ar"`~.ew..r ~~~ ~ ,./~ ~~ ~.orz..(.une. se ~0 1 ..ns s.,n+,ou ~ 1' K-- w"unr ~.uo.~os SUB-AREA 1- DESIGN ANALYSIS MAP SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE 1 9.2.2 Design Plan Priority Area The Community Design Plan for Bear Gulch Village will relate to all properties in the shaded area. ~) =~~ -~ .-a 1 U i~ - 1 ~ ;- ~ -_ -, ~ S~lJJ ~~ . „~..iiil:: 1 ~ ~• 6 ~ +i~ „ " r~~~. ' ~ ~ ~. ~ _ ~I J . - - 11J. '~~ 'J_IJ > ~ ~ '~.7J ~a J J ~7:itFC~i 1T~,J sz~:3JT • 25' Bu!L DING SETBACHS • PEDESTRIAN SCALE AROHRELTURE • acw-~VHMAL LANOSGARE ARRANGEMENT • ACCENT TREES • VILLAGE STpEETSCARE VOCABULARY • REAR AND 510E PARKING SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6112/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE ' 9.2.3 Building Sit)ng The concept for this activity center is to ' reinforce existing restaurant use with similar and complimentary uses. Building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard will be reduced to twenty-five feet from the curb (12' parkway and 13' setback from pro- perly linel. Architectural scale is to ' remain at a "village" scale, one-story along sidewalks, with two story structures allowed beyond the fifty foot setback (38' from property line) limits. Parking lots etween the front property line and K'ro~ M/NM w~IMv, Ta,h ,,,,. major structures, are strongly dis- ~ couraged. Front setbacks for parking '~' ' areas shall be forty-five feet from the ro~~'' Nro ~° "°" ""°"` ultimate curb line 133' from front prop- i erty linel. ' An eight 181 foot sidewalk will be located "'^°' ~"'° ' behind a five (6j foot turf strip. The ~~ K/NI+Yr NM ~' remaining land area within the front set- ' - - back shall be either informally landscaped :a~n..F .,r,. or an additional hardscape area expanded, ~ depending upon pro osed buildin t i rr p g en r es, windows, and walls. The sidewalk materi- ,,„„-. ~ ~-~~-~--'°"°°"~^"'O'~ al shall be a "medium broom" finish, terra ~ o~..~,-.~~,a,,.~ ~°ny ~o~`y~ cotta colored concrete. Natural colored ~ concrete is not recommended due to its highly reflective nature, lack of interest, _`~ ..~s , ~ .,.,..,. and inability to carry through the desired _ _ _ _ i~ ~ -. "village" design concept. ~ I There will not be a requirement for ~ r~ ~ ~OT~' ~ - existing structures and parking lots to ~i, ', ','~ sronoeb ~ ~ ~ comply with these new standards. Only new develo ment and red v l t f ~-~II_ i l t + ~ ~~ ~ ~'Q'~~'`y°B p e e opmen o ~ the exterior facade shall incorporate ' ~~0~ - these setbacks and design concepts into their designs. -- SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 4ND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE 1 e.z,s Architectural Imaoierv All buildings should project a design vocabulary sensitive to the architecture of the Sycamore Inn and Magic Lamp, which includes multiple low-pitched roofs, traditional window shapes and placement, porches, arcades and portiws. Overall scale should relate to the pedestrian, with a decidedly intimate "human scale". Buildings over two stories in height are not recommended in the activity center. Various architectural details, forms, materials, and colors are appropriate if they harmonize with the basic materials and color palette for Bear Gulch Village summarized in the Community Design Pal- ette Section and within the Design Guidelines section. ~Nr~' /~F Pir~~ Mu~ri-P/iNEO w/~voo<t~s M(/Lr/- P~Ne~ ~.~s pGCP PO~`rh' RIPON CaY~!///vyi ,°.ONfl ~PfUT~1v ~'OiNb 6/12/87 SUBAREA DESIGN STANDARDS _. AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE ' 9.2.5 Landsoce/Streetscape Imagery ' The sequence of views upon entering Rancho Cucamonga at Grove Avenue will shape the opinions of motorists as to the quality of city they're entering. There- ' fore, the importance of the imagery of landscape and streetscape elements is paramount in Bear Gulch Village. ' The concept within the activity center area is to incorporate an informal street tree planting system utilizing an ' informally shaped, colorful street tree palette. The trees (Sycamores and Crepe Myrtle) are to be planted in an informal arrangement and are to be placed ' between two to five feet inside the property line. 9.2.6 Community Design Palette ' ARCHITECTURAL Character Determinant -- Sycamore Inn (landmark( o Wall Materials: Textured stucco Stained or painted woods ' (clapboard, board & batten Brick, Cobblestone, river rock, fieldstone(. __ o Roofs/Pitches: Gable, hip or shed roofs Pitch 3:12 to 6:12 _ Wood shingle P.sphalt shingle ' Slate Metal (colored earthtones) ~ ® i o Accents Exposed rafter tails Warm color accents Towers, cupolas, rotundas, and campaniles Multi lighted windows Vine arbors Curved parapet walls Covered walkways Awnings o Scale: Two story heights with the first floor oriented towards the pedestrian. o Colors Warm earthtones with bright color accents 1~Vhite (stucco only) These color ranges are examples and only encouraged to be utilized. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL: o Crepe Myrtle, (secondary activity node) o Sycamore (primary activity node) o Carolina Laurel Cherry (major median species) o Flowering Plum (secondary suburban parkway and median accent tree) In order to prevent a barren wintertime street scene, street, parkway, and median trees have been selected to avoid a comple~ely deciduous palette. Activity center trees planted in informal styles shall be at a minimum of 30 inch box size in order to achieve a sufficient height fur clear vislbili[y wider the canopy. ' SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6112(87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE 9.3 SUBAREA ONE LAND USE REGULATIONS 9.3.1 Primary Function/Loration Subarea One is located contiguous to the Foothill Corridor between Grove and Vineyard Avenues. Subarea One will act as a major gateway into the community, dominated by a Specialty Commercial Activity Center, (Foothill and San Bernardino) designed as the primary activity center within the subarea. (~;~ ~~~ \~ --'- ~~ _. a_ ~ ~>_ ~, l J The following matrix establishes the uses which are permitted (X1, conditionally permitted 101, or not permitted in each of the five affected land use subcate- gories. NOTE: Site Development Standards (Section 9.2.3.2 and 9.2.3.3) shall only apply to shaded areas. ~-: - i ~f 333 33 3=~ /.%re v % / J 7 V i J _ '1 / ~' / 7 y? ~7 ~ ~' V J~j y J,~ ' ' '~ :J ~t Y~i S:t ~.j~~~]?7?J7~ SUB-AREA i - PRI©RITY AREA MAP SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE kEGU CATION SUBAREA ONE 1 1 1 1 1 rr~ i 9.3.2 Permitted and Conditional Uses Retail Conmercial Uses - Land Use SC CC O MR P Antique Shops X Apparel ( ): al boutiques X X b) wholesale E discount stores X X Appliance Stores (major) X Art, Music, and Photographic Studios, and Supply Stores X X Auto Service Station O O Auto Service (including motorcycles, boats, trailers and campers: a) Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) O b) Rentals O c) Repair (major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, and upholstery) d) Coin-op Washing e) Automatic Washing f) Parts and Supplies X m ~Le.i..~ L..,~a ..,. i.,l v v Barber! Beauty/Hairstylist Shops X X X Cocktail Lounge(6ar, lounge, tavern) O O O including related entertainment Bicycle Shops X X Blueprint and Photo Copy Services X X X Bed & Breakfast O O Book, Gift, and Stationary Stores X X X !other than adult related Illdter iei I Candy and Confections X X Retail Commercial Uses -Continued 9-10 SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6!12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONF. 1 1 9.3.2 Permitted and Conditional Uses: Retail Commercial Uses - Land Use SC CC O M11R P nt qua ps Apparel ( )~ a) boutigues X X b) general X X Appliance Stores (major) X Art, Music, and Photographic Studios, and Supply Stores X X Auto Service Station O 0 Auto Service (including motorcycles, boats, trailers and campers: a) Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) O b) Rentals O c) M17inor Repair (does not include major engine work, muffler shops, paint lrg, body work, upholstery, etc.) 0 d) Coin-op R'ashing e) Automatk I4ashing f) Parts and Supplies X Bakeries (retail only) X X Barber/Beauty/Hairstylist Shops X X X Cocktail Lou rpe(bar, lounge, tavern) 0 O 0 Including related entertainment Bicycle Stops X X Blueprint and Photo Copy Services X X X Bed E Breakfast O O Book, Gift, and Stationary Stores X X X iotirer lltin adult related material) Candy and Confections X X - SUB--AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6112/H7 AND LAND USE REGULATION 1 1 1 G C~ Land Use SC CC O MR P orna ascent ac t es and Hospitals Catering Establishments X China and Glassware Stores X X Christmas Tree Sales lots Operated on a temporary Basis ( ) X Churches O O O Cleaning and Press(rg Establishments X X Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses wch as bowling, billiards O O b) Outdoor uses wch as tennis and basketball O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X Day Care Centers O O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X Drug Stores and Pharmacies X Farmers Markets ( ) X Floor Covering Shops X Florist Shops X X X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics X O Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X Janitorial Services and Supplies X Retail Commercial Uses -Continued ' SIIR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6111/87 AND LAND USE RECIILATIOni SUBAREA ONE Land Use SC CC O MR P Jewelry Stores X X Laundry (Self Service) X Leather Goods and Luggage Stores X X Liquor Stores O O Messenger and Wire Services X X Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios O X Newspaper and Magazine Stores X X X Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area ( 1 X Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores X X paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores X Pet Shops X X Photocopy (Xerox) X X Record and Tape Stores X X Restaurants /sit down): al With entertainment and/or the serving of acholic beverages O O b) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing) X X O c) Cafe, limited to 20 seats (including outdoor seating) X X X d) Fast Food (with drive-thru) O (without drive-thru) O O Shoe Stores and Shoe Repair Shops X X Speci aity is etaii O U SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE Retail Ca~wnercial Uses - Continued Land Use SC CC O MR P ' Sporting Goods Stores ( 1: a) Specialty; backpacking, tennis, skiing,mountain- Bering, fishing, etc.) X X ' b) General; encompassing a variety of sports equipment X Supermarkets X Swimming Pool Services and Sales X ' X X Tailor Shops Television, Radio, VCR, Stereo and CD ' Component Sales X ' Toy Stores X X Variety Department Stores, Junior Department Stores O X i ) d c : Veterinary ( omest a) Non-boarding X O ' b) Boarding O Watch and Clock Repair Stores X X Yardage Goods Stores X ' Entertainment and Cultural Uses - Land Use SC CC O MR P Arcades O O Cultural) Artist Exhibits: ' a) Indoor gallery and art sales X O b) Outdoor art exhibits ( 1 X O ' Discotheques O O ' Theaters: al Dinner theatre O O 6) Movie (multi-plex) O ' SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6l 12 /87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE 1 1 1 t Offlee and AdministrotNe Uses - Land Use SC CC 0 MR P m n s ra e, s ness, an Professional Office X X X Business and Office Services X X X Ranks, Finance Serv Ices and Institutions Without drive-thru X X X With drive-thru 0 O O interior Decorating Firms X X X Medical/Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics X X X Optician and Optometrical Shops X X X Realtors and Real Estate Offices X X X Travel Agencies X X X Residential Uses - Land Use SC CC O M19R P rg a am y etac - - - - Sirgle Family Attached (duplex, triplex, fou rplex) X Multi-family Dwellings: X 1) Ancillar Residential Uses a ome-care ac t es (6 or less) X b) On-site private recreat ion facilities X 2) Accessor Uses a ccessory structures X b) Home occupation X Public Use - Land Use SC CC O MR P Publ is Utility Installations SUR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 5/i7/g7 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE IJ 9,3.3 Site Development Standards - ' S~One 9,3.3.1 General Provisions The following Site Development Standards relate to the Specialty Commercial and Community Commercial land use districts, ' only. Site Development Standards relating to other land use districts within Subarea One shall conform to the City of ' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. 9.3.3.2 ' Site Dimensions and Height Limitations: amity enter Land Use Feature SC CC Minimum Developable Area ( ) tAC 2AC ' Minimum Lot Size ( ) lAC 2AC Minimum Lot Width 200'200' ' Mi L i t D th 175'175' n mum o ep - Height Limitations: a) Within 50' of street yard cu ru iece .~ .,, b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District (SFR) 25' 25' c) Other Locations 35' 35' d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45' 45' Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) 40$ 40$ Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyards, and patios) IS$ 15$ STIR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS _ 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION 1 1 1 0 9.3.3.3 Setbacks: Activity Center vAr~t Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb): tst Flr. 2nd Flr. o Foothill Boulevard 25' S0' 45' o Vineyard Avenue 25' S0' 45' Rear Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' S` Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' S' A SUBAREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUDARFA ONE 9.3.3.4 Site Dimensions and Height Limitations: Parkway Land Use Minimum Developable Area ( ) tAC NA Minimum Lot Size ( ) 1AC NA Minimum Lot Width 200' NA Minimum Lot Depth 175' NA Height Limitations: a) Within 50' of street yard curb face 20' 20' b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District 25' -- c) Other Locations 40' 35' d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45' 45' Maximum Site Coverage (net lot areal 40$ 40$ Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyards, and patios) 15$ 15$ Open Space 45$ ^' SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS ' 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE 1 1 9.3.3.5 Setbacks: Parkway Yard Building Parking Street Yard !measure from face of the ultimate curb): 1st Flr. o Foothill Boulevard 45' 45'avg - 30' min o Other 35' 35'avg - 25' min Rear Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' S' Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' S' 1 ' SUBAREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6!12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE 9.t SUBAREA TWO -- DESIGN ' !.l.1 Background Subarea Two is the smallest subarea within the Specific Plan Area. The Thomas Brothers Ylinery, which is located on the northeast corner of Foothill Bwlevard and Vineyard Avenue, Is one of the few historical structures in the Specific Plan Area. Research into the regional history of the fucamonga area has led to the establishment of a Rancho Cucamonga Heritage image which reflects ' the agricultural heritage of the entire req fon. 1 ^~ ^ The activity center in Subarea Twc is located at the Intersection of Vineyard Averwe and Foothill Boulevard. The par- cels located in this area are currently de- signated "CC", Community Commercial, and "SC", Specialty Commercial. The re- mainder of Subarea Two is composed of relatively new development, completed under pre-specific plan :onion. There is very little vacant land within this subarea. The email amount of vacant land which exists is in the act iv itv center at VinevarA Avenue ann hoothlll Boulevard. ~~-._.. ~.. _ ~V i % - /~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ -- 1 n.ane eenmu v"u ,uv~o ~..•u SUB-AREA 2 - DESIGN ANALYSIS MAP r ................. ' -,o,..w,,..,.e y-: a~.,,..~..,~.. .o j ..,,..,.... ~ ..~~.,....w,,,.~..,,. .o ., -~ ~~~~~ L., --...,.....,.,,o..,, ~,o.,..,. .,. L._ ...,,~...~ „~.., .,.,, ..,. ' St1R-Ao.FA nESIr,N STANnA :na 5/12~A7 ANn I_ANf1 nSF REf,IILgTInN SUBAREA TWO 1 9.4.2 Design Plan Priorkv Area The Design Plan far the urban activity center located at Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard will relate to "CC" and "SC" land use designations. /f ,~ ci // 1. %~ '" =~i lt', j t.•.•.•.• w.... ~..,..... JJ~'- SUB-AREA 2 -PRIORITY AREA MAP SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12187 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA TWO ' 9.0.3 Building Siting ' The wncept for this activity center is to concentrate specialty commercial and community commercial uses at the inter- ' section of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue ' are to be twenty-five feet minimum from the ultimate curb line. All off-street parking is to be set hack at least fifty feet from the ultimate curb line. Parking ' lots located between the front property line and major structures are strongly discouraged. In addition, building masses should not have large expanses of parking located between structures. The environ- ment on each of these properties should be conducive to pedestrian movements from major parking areas to commercial establishments. Due to the depths of these properties it is impractical and ' wasteful to require all buildings 6e to located on the front setback line. F1ow- ever, all sites should have some building ' or portions of buildings located on the front (street) setback line; consistent with site development standards for these properties. 1 SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA TWO 9.~.t Architectural latagery Aa previously mentioned, the Thomas Brothers Winery is the style determinant in this subarea. The main buildings at the Thomas Brothers Winery do not por- tray "special" architectural features other than a grape arbor and multiple shed roofs. Investigations Into the archi- tectural heritage of winery buildings a~ggests that the structure Is repre- sentative of the California Barn Style (see sketch). The simple, clean lines of the barn In profile provide an almost un- limited range of architectural expressions. The barn silhouette is universally recog- nized as a symbol of the winery culture and Is uniquely su lted to serve as the primary architectural prototype for this subarea. Repeated use of Uu ildirg materials, color, and basic architectural elements, tan be expanded so that proposed bull dings can be designed In harmony wRh the basic contextual "feel" of the winery. 9.x.5 LandacapelStreetscape Imagery T6M1 ..itLi .Lw •L~it.• cpt .. , ....~ area ~is-to Incorporate a~formal, regularly spaced street tree planting system utilizing an Informally shaped, colorful street tree palette. The trees are to be planed 35 feet on center and are to placed between two to five feet inside the property Tine (see Illustrations Section 6.3.2), Pcv t'ir-~ /mP 9.x.6 Design Palette: ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER DETERMINANT: THOMAS BROTHERS WINERY o Wall Materials: Textured stucco, smooth stucco Clapboard or board and batten siding Vertical wood siding Brick Cobblestone, rNer rock, fieldstone o Roofs: Gable, hip, and shed roofs Pitch - 3:12 to 6:12 Wood shingle Asphalt shingle Slate Metal (colored earthtones) o Accents: Vine arbors, covered walkways Roof overhangs over entries Multi-I ighted windows Porches n ~.u+.. ~u .u .uu+ o Scale: One to two stories with towers, pergolas, campaniles. o Colors:• White to off-white Beige, sand, warm earth tones Pastels with primary color accents ' ~//~ " These color ranges are only examples / ~ ~"-^'°~~'s+An'EO n"~' and are only encouraged to be ~i/" r utilized. _ --- Cvrrro .~vrcr-sri<a ~,_ `~Pu~P ~vcr nrrm S/~'µYC ..X.co WiV~hs 6/12/87 SI1R-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SII RAREA TWO 1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL o Crape Myrtle (primary urban activity node and median species) o Honeylocust (secondary urban actvity node and median spec (es) o London Plane Tree (primary suburban parkway and median species) o Carolina Laurel Cherry (major median species) o Flowering Plum (secondary suburban parkway and median accent tree) In order to prevent a barren wintertime streetscene, street, parkway and median trees have been selected to avoid a completely deciduous palette. Activity center trees planted in a regimental style shall be at a mf nlmum of 30 inch box size in order to achieve sufficient height. 9.5 SUBAREA TWO LAND USE REGULATIONS 9.5.1 Primary Function/Loration Subarea Two is located contiguous to the Foothill Corridor, between Vineyard and Archibald Avenues. This Subarea contains a variety of land use activities, including the Thomas Brothers Winery, which pre- vails as the Subarea Activity Center. The following matrix establishes the uses which are permitted 1X1, conditionally permitted (O1, or not permitted in each of the five affected land use subcategories. NOTE: Site Development Standards Section 9.3.3.2 and 9.3.3.3 shall apply to shaded areas only. SU8-AREA 2 -PRIORITY AREA MAP SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6112/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA TWO 1 r e 9.5.2 Permitted and Conditional Uses Retail Commercial Uses - Land Use SC CC O MHR Antique Shops X Apparel Stores ( ): a) Boutiques X X b) General O Appliance Stores and Repair X Art, Music, Photographic Studios, and Supply Stores X X Auto Service Station O O Auto Service (including motorcycles, boats, trailers and campers: a) Sales (with ancll lary repair facilities) O b) Rentals O c) Minor Repair (does not Include mayor engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) O d) Coin-op Washing e) HUtemat lC waSnlfKJ f) Parts and Supplies X Bakeries (retail only) X X Barber and Beauty Shops X X X E ' SUR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12 /(17 AND LAND USE REGtl U1T IOM 1 1 R~LiI Camn~-tla1 Uus -Continued Land Use SC CC O MHR Bicycle Shops X X Blueprint and Photo Copy Services X X X Bed E Breakfast ( 1 O O Book, Gift, and Stationary Stores X X X (other than adult related material) Candy and Confectioneries X X Catering Establishments X Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment O O 0 China and Glassware Stores X X Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales lots Operated on a Temporary Basis 1 I X Churches O O O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X r~.~me..-~~i ae~.e...:,..,. a) Indoor uses such as bowling, billiards O O b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O 0 O Curtain and Drapery Shops X Day Care Centers O O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food X X Drug Stores end Pk~armacies X Farmers Markets ( 1 X Floor Covering Shops X SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/72/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SIJ BAR EA TW(l 1 1 1 Retsil Commere ial Uus -Continued Land Use SC CC 0 MHR Florist Stops X X X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics X O Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X Janitorial Services and Supplies X Jewelry Stores X X Laundry (Self Service) X Leather Goods and Luggage Stores X X Liquor Stores O O Messenger and Wire Services X X Music, dance, and martial arts studios O X Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores lYithin Enclosed Area (1) X Office, Rosiness Machine and Ccmputer Component Stores X X Paint, Class, and Wallpaper Stores X Pet Shops X X Photocopy (Xerox) X X Record and Tape Stores X X SUR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 612 X87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA TWO 1 1 1 1 R~eail Camearefal Uses - Continued Land Use SC CC O MHR Restaurants Isit downl: a) With entertainment and/or the serving of acholic beverages O O b) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing) X X O c) Cafe, limited to 20 seats (including outdoor seating) X X X dl Fast Food (with drive-thru) O (Without drive-thrul O O Shoe Stores, sale and repair X X Specialty Retail O O Sporting Goods Stores ( 1: a) Specialty; backpacking, tennis, skiing,mou ntain- eering, fishing, etc.) X X b) General; encompassing a variety of sports equipment X Supermarkets X Swimming Pool Services and Sales X Tailor Shops X X Television, Radio, VCR, Stereo and CD Component Sales X Toy Stores X X Variety Department Stores, Junior Department Stores O X Veterinary (domestic); a) Non-boarding X O b; Ecardinq O Watch and Clock Repair Stores X X Yardage Goods Stores X SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6(12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUPAREA TIYO 1 1 Entertainment and Cultural Uses - Land Use SC CC O MHR Arcades O O Cultural/Artist Exhibits; a) Indoor gallery X b) Outdoor art exhibits X 0 Discotheques O O Theaters: a) Dinner theatre 0 O b) Movfe (multi-plex) 0 Office and Administrative Uses Land Use SC CC 0 MHR Administrative, Business, and Professional Office X X X Banks, finance services and Institutions (without drive-thru) X X X (With drive-thrv) O O 0 Business and Cffice Services X X Interior Decorating Firms X X X Medical/Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics X X X Optician and Optometrical Shops X X Realtors and Real Estate Offices X X X Travel Agencies X X X ( ) Unlimited to SC District on northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. SlI6-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6(11/87 AND LAND l1SB REGl1LATION SUBAREA TtNO 1 1 1 i Residential Uses - Land Use SC CC 0 MHR Single Family Detached - - - - Sirgle Family Attached (duplex, - - - - triplex, fourplex) Multi-family Dwellings: X t) Anciiiary Residences a) Homecare facilities (6 or less) X b) On-site private recreation facilities X 2) Accessory Uses o accessory structures X o home occupation X 9.5.3 Site Develo nt Standards - rea ~ 9,5.3,1 General Prw lsions: The following Site Development Standards relate to Specialty Commercial and Community Commercial land use districts, within the activity center only. Site development standards relating to other land use districts within Su6a rea Two shall conform to the City of Rancho Cuca morga's Development Code. SUR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6112/67 AND LAND l1SE REGULATION S URAREA TWO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9.5.3.2 Site Dimensions and Haigh Limitations c1C~t v ty enter Feature SC CC Minimum Developable Area ( ) 1AC 2AC Minimum Lot Size ( ) 1AC 2AC Minimum Lot Width 200' 200' Minimum Lot Depth 175' 175' Height Limitations: a) Within 50' of street yard curb face 20' 20' b) Within 100 feet of a residential district (SFR) 25' 25' c) Other locations 35' 35' d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 95' 45' Maximum Site Coverage (net lot areal q0$ q0$ Minimum onsite landscaping 15$ 15$ (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyards and patios) SU8-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12167 AND LAND USE REGULATION 1 1 ~! i C 9.5.3.3 Setbacks Activity Center Yard Building Parkins 1st Flr. 2nd Flr. Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb!: o Foothill Boulevard 25' S0' 50' o Vineyard Avenue 25' 50' 50' Rear Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' 5' Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' 5' SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6112/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAR'<A TWO t 1 1 r 9.5.3.4 Site Dimensions and Height Limitations Parkway Land Use Feature MHR O Minimum Developable Area 1 1 lAC Minimum Lot Size ( 1 1AC Minimum Lot Width NA Minimum Lot Depth NA Height Limitations: al Within 50' of street yard curb face 20' 20' b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District 25' c) Other locations 35' 40' d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45' 45' Maximum Site Coverage (net lot areal 40$ Maximum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyards, and patios) 15$ Open Space 45$ SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12!87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA T14O 1 9.5.3.5 Setbacks aP Tway Yard Building Parking Street Vard (measure from face of the ultimate curb): 1st Flr. o Foothill Boulevard 95' 95' Avg. 30' Agin. o Other 25' 35' Avg. 25' A^,in. Rear Property Line: o Adjacent to Exlstirg or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' S' Inter(or Side Property Ll ne: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Exlsting or Planned Commercial Development 10' S' SIIR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6112187 AND LAND I1SE REGULATION SUBAREA TVYO 1 1 1 1 A 9.6 SUBAREA THREE -- DESIGN GUIDELINES 9.6.1 Background Subarea Three is the most varied and eclectic subarea. It contains the "central" activity center at the inter- section of Foothill Boulevard and Archi- bald Avenue. This activity center, known as the Cucamonga Towne Center, will be more urban in nature than all other activity centers along Foothill Boulevard. Land uses vary considerably within this subarea, with small- to medium-sized commercial uses dominating the central portion of the Subarea. o DO ~..,,. ~T, F.-_ .. s o~ U ~' ~~r} v~ - °o °° oo ~ ~._ b .o,,.~..,,. a~gaaop~~ i`- --- ~ ~~ "~ ~7 ,~; ~ - - , ,_::..- SUB-AREA 3 -DESIGN ANALYSIS MAP SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12(87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 9.6.2 Design Plan Priority Aress Unlike any other subarea, Subarea Three has two activity centers located within it. The first activity center is located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. Its boundaries are irregular and do not correspond to a land use district, but generally relate to the CC and SC land use designations. The second activity center is located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Turner Avenue. This is referred to as the Turner Intersection. It is a minor center with less formality than the Cucamonga Towne Center. The Community Design Plan for this minor activity center will relate to the CC and CO land use designations. v~~ J. _. ~~ LJ -_ ~ j ~'' . M: 1: ~' . ~ ~. ~.. •~ .__ _ _ _ _ ...__. ~ ~. -... wvTviF f~ - ~•_~~ SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SURARF.A THREE 1 9.6.3 Buildirw Sitirw The concept for the Cucamonga Towne Center is to create a retail commercial core which emphasizes pedestrian circul- ation. This will be accomplished by pro- moting building clusters with parking lots located away from pedestrian travel routes. Building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard will be twenty-five feet from the curb with hardscape and landscape predominant. Parking is prohibited in the front setback areas. Setbacks for the second and third stories of any building located in this activity center are fifty and sixty feet, respec- tively. Ground floor courtyards or plazas on private property are encouraged. The intersection at Archibald Avenue will become the primary focus for Foothill Boulevard. Buildings at this location should incorporate architectural features which emphasize urban qualities. Fea- tures will include corner cut-offs and vertical elements such as towers, flag- poles, trellis structures, etc. In the activity center, no setbacks are required at the side or rear property lines for buildings located on the twenty-five foot front setback line; in order to encourage a continuous row or cluster of buildings at the street frontage. Buildings sited in the activity center with parking located between the primary structure entry and the street shall provide full side and rear-yard setbacks. SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 1 9.6.4 Architectural I magery The objective at this section is to up- grade design quality and image as existing structures are removed or redeveloped. The architectural context for the Cuca- monga Towne Center will be to create an intimately-scaled retail district that will emphasize the quality of the pedestrian shopping experience. Elements which help achieve this "scale" include facade wmposition, rooflines, doors, windows, walls, awnings, colors, materials, and finishes. M~7SY,t~ I >Ta/GO OC/.^OI INGP ryyPr WAtN-3 oA19SN PdLM`- 6AD.%E H/P ON'N S,Ym p/zry IWF' /'WF PWF D~/1 ~`l/ !~ ~ ' A+naP- TON'FYY /~/iMS Mys+'>' PM'm TA,FS MYNOLW~ SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12187 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 1 r 1 1 n 9.6.5 LandscapeJStreetsrx Imaaerv The landscape/streetscape concept within Cucamonga Town Center is highlighted by a formal, double-row street tree planting utilizing an informally-shaped, colorful street tree. Landscape and hardscape materials are selected to perform a variety of functions; including improving and softening building appearance, im- proving street appearance and promoting sound absorption. The double row of trees promotes an "urban image" which acts as a counter point to suburban oriented themes. This urban accent will remain predominant throughout the planning area. In addition to the double row of trees on Foothill Boulevard, an equally urban palette of shrubs, turf, potted plants, attractive paving, benches, lighting and other elements will make the pedestrian streetscapes attractive and usable. Sidewalks located within the Cucamonga Towne Center contiguous to Foothill Boulevard will extend from turf islands to building walls. To avoid any design/ safety problems with Caltrans, a double row of trees shall be planted on private property. The trees are to be planted in a regimental fashion (sea graphic in Section 8.3.2 for clarityl. The sidewalk material shall be a "medium broom" finish, incorporating a terra wtta color. SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 9.6.6 o Scale Minor City Entry Three story heights with the first ' Located due east of Center Avenue is Day floor oriented towards the pedestrian. Creek. Numerous functional improvements have been made to the creek channel it- o Colors:* self, as well as the inclusion of landscape and hardscape Improvements. Warm earth tones with bright color accents This location is considered a minor entry Pastels ' portal to the City. White (stucco only) q,6,7 * These color ranges are only examples Community Design Palette and are only encouraged to he utilized. ARCHITECTURAL LA NDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER DETERMINANT -- Contemporary interpretations of the o Crape Myrtle (primary urban activity winery or barn prototypes: node and median species) o Wall Materials: o Honeylocust Gleditsia Triaca nthos (secondary activity node and median ' Textured stucco species) Smooth stucco Stained or painted woods (clapboard, o London Plane Tree (primary suburban board E batten) parkway and median species) Brick Cobblestone, river rock, fieldstone o Carolina Laurel Cherry (major median species) o Roofs/Pitches: ~ioweriny 7ium (sewnua~y su(.u,Lou Gable, hip or shed roofs (flat roofs parkway and median accent tree) may be appropriate for three story structures only). In order to prevent a barren winter Pitch 3:12 to 6:12 streetscape, street, parkway and Wood shingle median trees have been selected to ' Asphalt shingle avoid a completely deciduous palette. Slate Metal (colored ea rthtone) ll rban activity node trees planted in ' regimental style shall 6e a minimum o Accents: of 30 inch box in size. ^ Exposed rafter tails J~ Warm Color accents Towers, cupolas ^ Mulii-iig bled windows R Vine arbors Curved parapet walls Covered walkways Awnings i SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12187 AND LAND USE REGULATION 1 i 1 1 9.7 SUBAREA THREE LAND USE REGULATIONS 9.7.1 Primary Functionll.oration Subarea Three, located contiguous to the Foothill Corridor, between Archibald Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel, wn- tains avariety of commercial, office and residential land uses ranging from Low- Medium Residential uses to higher inten- sity Community Commercial uses. This Planning Subarea also contains aMixed- Use district composed of Convenience Commercial and Medium-High Density Residential uses. A community activity The following matrix establishes the uses which are permitted lXl, conditionally permitted 10), or not permitted in each of the five affected land use subcategories. NOTE: Site Development Standards Section 9.4.3.2 and 9.4.3.3 shall apply to shaded areas only. The MU land use area shall require a master plan for the entire area between Hellman, Klusman, San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard (see Land Use Mapi. SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6112/87 AND LAND USF REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 1 1 1 1 G 9.7.2 Permitted and Conditbnal Uses Retail Commercial Uses - Land Use SC CC CO LMR MR U MU Antique Steps X X* Apparel Stores ( ): a) Boutiques X X X b} General X X Appliance Stores (major) X Art, Music, Photographic Studios, and Supply Stores X X X X Auto Service Station O O Auto Service (Inc ludirg motorcycles, boats, trailers and campers: a) Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) 0 b) Rentals 0 c) Minor Repair (does not include major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc,) O d) Coin-op Washing O e) Automatic IYashirg 0 f) Naints ana ~uppnes + Does not Include thrift or second hand stor es. SUB-AREA DESIGN STANnARDS 6/12187 AND LAND USE REGULATION 1 1 Retail Commercial Uses -Continued Land Use SC CC CO LMR MR U MU Bakeries (retail only) X X X X Barber and Beauty Shops X X X X Bed and Breakfast O O O Bicycle Shops X X Blueprint and Photo Copy Services X X Book, G(ft, and Stationary Stores (other than adult related material) X X X X Candy and Confectioneries X X X X Catering Establishments X X China and Glassware Stores X X Christmas Tree Sales lots Operated on a Temporary Basis X Churches 0 O O O O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X X X Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment O O O Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowling, billiards O O O b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X X Day Care Center O O O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X X X 5116-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6!11/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 1 Retail Commercial Uses -Continued Land Use SC CC CO LMR MR U MU Drug Stores and Pharmacies X X ~armcrs Ms; Icets ( ) X Floor Covering Shops X Florist Shops X X X X Furniture Stores X Hardware Stores X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics X O O Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X X X Janitorial Services and Supplies X Jewelry Stores X X Laundry (Self Service) X O Leather Goods and Luggage Stores X X Liquor Stores u u Messenger and N,~ire Services X X A4usic, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios X X Newspaper and Magazine Stores X X X X Nurseries end Garden Supply Stores Within Enclosed Area ( ) X Office, Puniness Machine and Computer Component Stores X X X Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores X Pet Stops X X SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6!12187 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 1 1 1 1 1 e~ i r Retail Caneerci~l Uses - Continued Land Use SC CC CO LMR MR U MU Photocopy X X Record and Tape Stores X X X Restaurants (sit down!: a) With entertainment and/or the serving of acholic beverages O O O 6) Incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing) X X O O c) Cafe, limited to 20 seats (including outdoor seating) X X X O dl Fast Food (with drive-thru) O (Without drive-thrul O O Shoe Stores and Shoe Repair Shops X X X X Specialty Retail O O Sporting Goods Stores ( 1: a) Specialty; backpacking, tennis, skiing,mountain- eering, fishing, etc.) X X X 61 General; encompassing a variety of sports eyuiyumui n Supermarkets X Swimming Pool Services and Sales X Tailor- Shops X X X Television Radio, VCR, Stereo and CD Component Sales X Toy Stores X X Variety Department Stores, Junior Department Stores O X Veterinary (domestic!: a) Non-boarding X X bl Boarding O O Watch and Clock Repair Shops X X X X SU B-A REA DESIGN STANDARDS _6_/12!87. AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 1 1 r 1 w r Retail Cemmerclal Uses - Contirwed Land Use SC CC CO LMR MR U MU Yardage Goods Stores X Entertainment and Cultural Uses - Land Use SC CC CO LMR MR V M11U Arcades O O Cultural/Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor gallery X O X b) Outdoor art exhibits (1) X O Discotheques O O Theaters: a) Dinner theatre O 0 b) Movie (multi-plex) O Office and Administrative Uses - Land Use SC CC CO LMR M11R U MU Administrative, Business, and Professional Office X X X X Banks, Financial services, and Institutions (without drive-thna) X X X O (With drive-thru) O O O O Business and Office Services X X Interior Decorating Shops X X X Medical/Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics X X O Optician and Optometrical Shops X X O Realtors and Real Estate Offices X X X X Travel Agencies X X X X (1) Limited to office conversion of existing resi dential dwellings in the SC District on the northwest corner of Foot hill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. SIIR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE Ruida~tlal Um - Land Use SC CC CO LMR MR U MU Single Family Detached X X Single Family Attached (duplex, triplex, fourplex) X X X Multi-family Dwellings X X 11 Ancillary Residences: a) Home-care facilities I6 or less) X X X b) On-site private recreation facilities X X X 21 Accessory Uses: a) Accessory structures X X X b) Home occupation X X X Public Use - Transit Facilities Public Utility Installations X Hotel Uses - rIOLEU motel `~ ~~ SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12187 AND LAND USE REGULATION SII RAREA THREE 1 f S 9.7.3 Site Development Standards - 9.7.3.1 General Provisions The followirg Site Development Standards relate to the Specialty Commercial and Community Commercial land use districts within the act Wity center only. In general, these affected land use districts and associated parcels are located at the Intersections of Foothill BoulevardlArchi- bald Avenue; and Foothi!! Boulevard/Turner Avenue. Site development standards related to the remainder of Subarea Three shall Conform to the City of Rancho Cucamorga's Development Code. 9.7.3.2 Site Dimensions and Height Limitations ct v ty enters Feature SC CC Minimum Developable Area ( ) CAC 2AC Minimum Lot Size ( ) lAC 2AC Minimum Lot Width <uu' 20G' Minimum Lot Depth 175' 175' Height Limitations: a) Within 50' of street yard curb face 20' 20' b) Within 100 feet of a Residential D(strict(SFR) 25' 25' c) Other Locations 35' 35' d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 95' 45' Maximum Site Coverage (net lot areal 40$ 40$ Minimum On-Site Landscapir7y iincludes articulated plazas, ha rdscape areas, turf areas) 15$ 15$ 9-47 SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6It2187 AND LAND USE REGULATION 9.7.3.3 Setbacks Activity Centers Yard Building Parkins 1st Flr. 2nd Flr. Street Yard (measured from face of the ultimate curbl: o Foothill Boulevard 25' S0' 45' o Other 25' S0' 45' Rear Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 0'* 5' Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 0'* 5' "~ * In the activity centers, no setbacks are required at the side or rear property lines im uuiiuinya iuw ieu uu iiie ieniy-live iuui iruni se[oack line; in order [o encourage a continuous row or cluster of buildings at the street frontage. Building sited in the activity centers with parking located between the primary structure entry and Foothill Boulevard shall provide full LO' side and rear-yard setbacks. SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12!87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA THREE 1 t t 9.7,3.4 Site Dimensions and Height Limitations Parkway Land Use Feature CO CC MR MU/R LMR M1li nimum Developable Area ( ) lAC 2AC -- SAC SAC Minimum Lot Size ( ) 1AC 2AC -- SAC SAC Minimum Lot Width 200' 200' -- -- -- Minimum Lot Depth 775' 175' -- -- -- Height Limitations: a) Within 50' of street yard curb face 20' 20' 2a' 29' 20' b) Within 100 feet of a Residential Dist rict(SFR) 25' 25' -- -- -- c) Other Locations 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 95' 45' 45' 45' 45' Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) 40$ 90$ 40$ 90$ Maximum On-Site Landscaping [Includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyards, and patios) 15$ IS$ 15/ 45$ 15/45$( ) Opou Lpcc. nca nan SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/07 AND LAND 115E REGULATION 9.7.3.5 Setbacks aF-r&way Yard Buildup Park irp Street Yard (meawre from face of the ultimate curb): 1st Flr. Znd Flr. o Foothill Boulevard 45' S0' 45'* o Archibald Averwe OS' S0' 45'** Rear Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development TS' 15' o Adjacent to Exlsting or Planned Commercial Development 10' S' Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 15' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 70' S' " 45' avg - 30' min •* 45' avg - 30' min SUR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/tt 167 AND LAND USF. REGULATION _ SUBAREA THREE 9.E SUBAREA FOUR -- DESIGN CU DEL NES ' 9.8.1 Badcaround ' Subarea Four is the final subarea within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Area and is physically separated from the other subareas. This physical separation, how- , ever, should not be allowed to disrupt the overall design continuity of Foothill Boulevard. ' This "Etiwanda Gateway" subarea is the least urban of the four subareas. Struc- ' lures in the area do not currently have a strong architectural style or thematic sense. This Subarea serves as a major entry into the Foothill Corridor, and as such, should project a strong, design image. i }' -1 ~ %~ .~=1 9.8.2 Cannunity Desicn Priority Area The Community Design Plan for the urban activity center will relate to the CC, RRC, MU/C and CVC land use designa- tions at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Subarea four is much less urbanized than the other three subareas. Due to the amount of vacant land and nondescript architectural legacy, there was no purpose in developing a design analysis map. However, all of the architectural, landscape architectural and streetscape elements will come directly from the other sub-areas to ensure the design continuity of Foothill Boulevard. Unlike Lhe other activity centers along Foothill Boulevard, the activity center at Etiwanda will not require detailed pedestrian amenities. It is recommended that landscape and rolling berms be utilized instead of hardscape materials. i `-' ~- . _ -' :. .. .,, . _~~~._ _ _ _. ..: _ ...... _. ..:. :~ - ~ ~ T ~ i ~ ' ~P :~~ ~,': ~ C 6~ ~ i ,~ .,..,_,... ~„GgtJ SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/72187 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA FOUR 1 e,a.s Buildim~ Siting The concept for the Etiwanda Cateway is to create character which portrays a re- gional commercial oriented image. Building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard will be twenty-five feet from the curb, with hardscape and landscape treatments predominant in this area. Parking is pro- hibited in this twenty-five foot setback area for properties at this intersection. 9.8.4 Architectural Ima~erv As with other subareas, no fixed archi- tectural "style" is mandated for the Etiwanda Cateway area. Buildings in this area should reflect the community design palette established generally for Foothill Boulevard, This palette incorporates the architectural "models" provided for by the Thomas Brothers Winery and Sycamore Inn. Buildings and structures shall incorporate such architectural elements as brick, wood, file and stucco details in order to maintain a "human" scale within this re- yiunai u, ien ieu al ea. Gcuwui uiu~.n, iiii up concrete, and similar "industrial-type" materials are prohibited from the activity center properties. 9.8.5 LandscapelStreetsrape Imagery The landscape/streetscape concept for the Etiwanda/Foothill intersection node is same as the concept for Cucamonga Towne Center with exception of pedestrian amenities. 9.8.6 Design Palette ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER DETERMINANT Contemporary interpretations of the winery or barn prototype: a Wall Materials: Textured stucco Smooth stucco Stained or painted woods (clapboard, board E batten) Brick Co661estone, river rock, fieldstone o Roofsl Pitches: Gable, hip or shed roofs (flat roofs for three story structures onlyl Pitch 3:12 to 6:12 Wood shingle Asphalt shingle Slate Metal (colored earthtone) o Accents: Exposed rafter tails COI 111 ~.VIVI 04,. c,lla Towers, cupolas Multi-lighted windows Vine arbors Curved parapet walls Covered walkways Awnings o Scale: Three story heights. ' SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA FOUR o Colors:* ' Warm earthtones with bright color accents Pastel s White (stucco only) * These color ranges are only examples and are only encouraged to be utilized. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL o Crape Myrtle (primary activity center node and median species) o Honeylocust Gieditsia Triacanthos (secondary activity center node and median species) o London Plane Tree (primary ' suburban parkway antl median species) o Carolina Laurel Cherry (major ' median species) o Flowering Plum (secondary suburban parkway and median accent tree) In order to prevent a barren win ie, lima streetscape, street, parkway and median trees have been selected to avoid a completely deciduous palette. ' Activity center trees planted in a regi- mental style shall be at a minimum 30 inch box in size. ' Northwest Corner of Foothill 81vd. and ast venue This site has been selected for a Community Commercial use with specific intent to allow for partial preservation of iF,e en istiry Cudyptus grove. The site plan for such use shall Incorporate as many existing trees as possible, but no S less than GO$ of the area of grove nor ^^ less than 25$ of the trees. Provisions shall also be made (or a 20' wide Greenway through the interior boundary near the northwest corner of the site for future connection to the Community Trail system and Miller Park. ' SUR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12167 AND LAND USE REGULATION 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 9.9 SUBAREA FOUR LAND USE REGULATIONS 9.9.1 Primary Function/Location Subarea Four is located contiguous to the Foothill Corridor, between the Devore I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. Subarea Four acts as a major gateway into the city of Rancho Cucamonga and is char- acterized by a variety of commercial, residential, industrial uses, and mixed use/residential. Regional related uses will be provided adjacent to the Devore Free- way, designed to compliment the Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center. The following matrix establishes the uses which are permitted 1X1, conditionally permitted (O1, or not permitted in each of the five affected land use subcategories. NOTE: Site Development Standards Section 9.5.3.2 and 9.5.3.3 shall apply to shaded areas only. ~~~~~~~: a .'~ _~ _ a : ~ ~ j, a~.~: SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6(12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SURARF.A FOUR 1 1 1 1 1 9.9.2 Permitted end Conditbnal Uses Retail Commercial Uses - Land Use CC RRC MR LI** Antique Shops Apparel Stores ( ): a) Boutiques X X b) General X X Appliance Stores and Repair X X Art, Music, and Photographic Studios and Supply Stores X X* Auto Service Station O O Auto Service (including motorcycles, boats, trailers and campers: a) Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) O b) Rentals O O c) Minor Repair (does not include major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) O O d) Coin-op Washing O e) Automatic 1Nashing O f) Parts and Jupplles n ii Bakeries (retail only) X X Barber and Beauty Stops X X* Bed and Breakfast Bicycle Shops X X * Blueprint and Photo Copy Services X X Book, Gift, and Stationary Stores X X (otYtir than adult related material) Candy and Confectioneries X X* Catering Establishments X X O ' SI18-AREA RESIGN STANDARDS 6112187 AND LAND IISE REGULATION 1 1 N IJJ Retail Commercial Uses -Continued Land Use CC RRC MR LI** China and Glassware Stores X X* Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales lots Operated on a Temporary E3es(s X Churches O O Cleaning and Pressing Estebl ishmens X X Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses wch as bowling, billiards O b) Outdoor uses wch as tennis and basketball O O Cornalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X X Day Care Centers 0 O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X * Drug Stores and Pharmacies X X Farmers Markets X X Florist Shops X X Floor Covering Shops X X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics X X* Hobby Shops X X* Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X* Jewelry Stores X X* Janitorial Services and Supplies X X* Laundry (Self Service) X SIIA-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION Sl18AR EA FOI1R R t il C i l U C e a ommerc a ses - ommercial ' Land Use CC RRC MR LI** Leather Goods and Luggage Stores X X Liquor Stores O Messenger and Wire Services X X* ' Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Studios X Newspaper and Magazine Stores X X* Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores ' Within Enclosed Area ( ) X X Office, Business Machine and ' Computer Component Stores X X Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores X X Pet Shops X X* Photocopy (Xerox) X X* ' R d T o d St X ec r an ape ores X Restaurants (sit down): a) With entertainment and/or i1F em viiy vi au Dui ii. beverages O 0 b) incidental serving of beer and wine {without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing! X X _ c) Cafe, limited to 20 seats - (including outdoor seating) X X d) Fast Food (with drive-thrv) O O -- (Without drive-thrv) O 0 Shoe Stores and Shoe Repair Shops X X Sporting Goods Stores ( ): _ !,'e.^.eral; encompassi:x~ a variety of sports - equipment X X o Specialty X X SUB-AREA DF_SICN STANDARDS __ 6/12!67 AND LAND USE REGII CATION SUBAREA FOUR r 1 Retail Commarciel Usea -Continued Land Use CC RRC MR LI** Supermarkets X X Swimming Pool Services and Sales X X Tailor Shops K Television, Radio, VCR, Stereo, and CDComponent Sales X X Toy Stores X X Variety Department Stores, Junior Department Stores X X Veterinary (domesticl: al Non-boarding X X b) Boarding O O Watch and Clock Repair Shops X X* Yardage Goods Stores X X Entertainment and Cultural Uses - Land Use CC RRC MR LI** Cultural/Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor gallery and art sales X b) Outdoor art exhibits ( ) O Discotheques O O Theaters: a) Dinner theatre O O 6) Movie (multi-plex) O O SUBAREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION Sl1ftARFA FOUR 1 1 yl omce .tea Adnanistretive uses - Land Use CC RRC MR LI** Administrative, Business, and Professional Office X X* Banks, Finance Services and Institutions (with drive-thru) O 0 (Without drive-thru) X X Business and Office Services X Interior Decorating Shops X Medical/Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics X X* Optician and Optometrical Shops X X* Realtors and Real Estate Offices X X* Travel Agencies X X* Residential Uses - Land Use CC RRC MR LI** Single Family Detached X .. .,y,.. ~~ .. r,,..., triplex, fourplex) X Multi-family Dwellings X 11 Ancillary Residences: a) home-care facilities (6 or less) X 61 On-site private recreat ion facilities X 21 Accessory Uses: a) Accessory structures X b) Home occupation X SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6i 12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SU9ARFA FOUR i 1 i -+ot.l Usu - Land Use CC RRC MR LI** Hotel /Motel X Hotel Facilities (majorl: X Ancillary Uses ( 1 o Beauty/Barber Shop X v Cafes X o Catering Services 1 1 O o Cocktail Lounge O o Cenferencel Convention Facilities O o Florist Shops X o Gift Shops X o NewspaperlMagazine Stores X o Pharmacies X o Restaurants (sit down) X o Tourist Information X o Travel Agencies X * CommerciallOffice uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one 111 major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 sq. ft. per site or project. This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large regionally related uses. Regionally related commercial uses are typified by large scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customers primarily from the neighborhood or community level . ** All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP). SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA FOl1R 9.9.3 Site Development Standards ' 9.9.3.1 General Provisions The following Site Development Standards relate precisely to Community Commercial, Reg tonal Commercial, and Mlx-Use Residential Land Use Districts within the ' activity center only (located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue). Site Development Standards related to other land use districts and locations within Subarea Four, shall conform to the City of ' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Industrial Area Specific Plan, and Etiwanda Area Specific Plan. 1 9.9.3,2 ' Site Dimensions and Hei ht Limitations ct v ty enter Feature CC RRC D bl ( ) Mi i l A 2AC SAC eve rea n mum opa e Minimum LoY Size ( ) 2AC SAC Minimum Lot Depth 175' 175' _ Height Limitations: a) Within 50' of street yard _ curb face 20' 20' b) Within 100 feet of a residential district 25' 25' c) Other locations 35' 35' d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45' 45' Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) 40$ 40$ Minimum On-Site Landscaping (Includes art kuiated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas) 15$ 15$ SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12187 AND LAND USE REGULATION 1 1 9,9.3.3 Setbacks Activity Center Yard Buildins Parkins 1st Flr. 2nd. Flr. Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb): o Foothill Boulevard 25' S0' 45' o Etiwanda Avenue 25' S0' 35' Rear Property line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' 5' Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' 5' SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 6/12/87 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUGAR F.A FOl1R ' 9.9.3,4 Site Dimensions and Height Limitations P~cway Feature RC and CC se LI R 1 Minimum Developable Area ( ) SAC 2AC 1AC - Minimum Lot Size ( ) 5AC 2AC 1AC -- Minimum Lot Width 200' 200' 200' -- Minimum Lot Depth 175' 175' 175' -- Height Limitations: ' a) Within 50' of street yard curb face 20' 20' - 20' b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District (SFR) 25' 15' 15' -- c) Other Locations 35' 35' 35' 35' d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 95' 95' q5' q5' ' Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) q0$ q0$ -- -- Maximum On-Site Landscaping (Includes articulated plazas, ha rdscape areas, turf areas, courtyards, and patios) 15$ IS$ 15$ Open Spacc q5£ SUB-AREA DESIf,N STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION i 1 1 1 9,9.3.5 Setbacks aP rTcway Yard Building Parking Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb): 1st Fir. o Foothill Avenue 45' 45'* o Other 35' 35'** Rear Property Llne: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Res}dential Development z5' 15' o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' S' Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development NA NA o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 10' S' * 49' avg - 30' min "* 35' avg - 25' min SUR-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS 12187 AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA FOUR ' PART V IMPLEMENTATION 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 i 10.1.5 Initiate a Small Business Assistance Prazram New business promotion and redevelop- ment activity do not mean that the needs of existing Foothill Corridor retail and service outlets will be neglected. The Specific Plan is committed to strengthen the operation of those firms which are viable contributors to serving neighbor- hood and community-wide consumer demands. In order to assist the small business sector, the City will work toward the establishment of a local development corporation in conjunction with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Seed money for such a venture is avail- able through Community Development Block Grant section 108 provisions and the Small Business Administration 504 program. The function of this nonprofit organiza- tion would be to stimulate the health and expansion of small businesses through law-interest loans or grants. This funding would support: uiuiuy wnai~ u..i{vu leasehold improvements renovation and modernization machinery and equipment land acquisition CDBG and Small Business Administration regulations each set the criteria for firms that may receive financial aid. For example, eligible businesses must have a net worth of less than $6 million and be the actual user of assets purchased with loan funds. The concept of "shared risk" is advanced as the SBA program will pro- •,,ide !oa.^s o.^.!y up to 4U~ of protect costs; owner equity and conventional bank/private sector lending must make up the remainder. The nonprofit development corporation will be an autonomous unit, outside of city government. However, its manage- ment board should include one or two representatives of city departments con- cerned with planning and community de- velopment. Board composition typically includes seven to eleven persons reflect- ing various business and community perspectives. Through this program, existing services for area residents will be strengthened, entrepreneurship supported, job growth will take place, and the corridor tax base will be expanded. 10.1.6 Promote Housirw Optwrtunities Supportive of Commercial Land Use Incentives A strong retail and service sector along any major traffic artery draws its life- blood from local and subregional consumer patronage. Both the business community and local government must work diligently to promote shopper use of the Foothill Corridor over other alternative destina- tions. Part of that strategy involves bringing more residents to the corridor vicinity because existing and planned ~Iz - <Ir ~~ through traffic for their viability. The recommended land use mix for the Specific Plan area calls for 369 total acres of commercial and office activity. When combined with existing commercial development elsewhere in Rancho Cuca- monga, as well as the retail and office acreage approved for Terra Vista and Victoria, this would give the City 1,108 acres of commercial land use, if all become a reality. (These figures DO NOT count any of the office or commercial land within the Industrial Specific Plan area.? 6/1Z/A7 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES 1 10.0 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES: The following Implementing Strategies are actions which are beyond the power of this Specific Plan and their enactment will occur by "separate acts" following the adoption of this Specific Plan. 10.1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES This section outlines the Economic Devel- opment strategy incorporated in this Specific Plan. These efforts are intended to provide the framework for financing area public and private improvements, which can bring the circulation and de- sign components of the Plan into reality and establish other mechanisms which will ultimately promote the viability of business activity along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. In following brief notes on the purposes of an economic development strategy, the discussion turns to five key components which constitute the economic blueprint for the planning area. Each component is described in terms of it's rationale, potential phasing, private and public _..-n.tl i~ie` -~~ rr ~ aTO funrlin j sources. An Economic Development Strategy is but one part of the overall Specific Plan, though it is crucial to achieving a land use pattern which is viable in the marketplace while supporting the design objectives of the Plan. It is one of the focused blueprints for implementation of goals and objectives. In addition, it functions as a coordinating device between such features as traffic, design image, and land use. Finally, it enum- erates the various administrative and finencief resources which will be required for effective implementation. Economic development covers just one of the many policy blueprints necessary to bring the Specific Plan's design, land use, and circulation sections into reality. Policies aimed toward retail and service land use, eventually will be evaluated not so much for their popular appeal, but whether or not they were carried out in practice and strengthened the local community. Therefore, this strategy is grounded in the findings of an earlier economic analysis conducted under this Specific Plan program and in the goals and objectives established with citizen input. Finally, an Economic Development Strategy enumerates the conditions under which various types of public assistance may occur. It also specifies what is ex- pected of both private and governmental participants in the implementation pro- cess. Because resources for implement- ation are always limited, it is essential to prioritize objectives for the future and to reexamine these as time brings changes to the Rancho Cucamonga area. An underly- ing philosophy for economic development along the Foothill Corridor is that com- r al nrnnncalc ~h~uld he initiated by the private sector. Local government participation primarily will be used to provide a receptive climate in response to those proposals and to install special mechanisms that foster private action among retail and service businesses. Implementation policies may be divided into two types; administrative mechanisms and financial incentives. Some changes in the administrative climate for economic development are generally necessary to make use of specific incentive devices. Moreover, local government policy should give priority to improving the climate for the local economy rather than on the provision of financial subsidies. ' 6/12/87 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES ' Recommended economic development pol- icy components for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor are described below in their ' order of priority. In each case, the rationale, phasing, and potential sources of funding are considered. 1 1 10.1.1 Creation of Western Foothill Redevelopment Project Area The City of Rancho Cucamonga has sup- ported the concept of redevelopment through formation of a project area that extends over much of the study area lying between Haven and the Devore Freeway. The Specific Plan recommends creation of a second project area from the Deer Creek channel or Turner Avenue to the City's western boundary. Terri- tory in the Etiwanda area, though included in other sections of this Specific Plan, would not be within the proposed redevelopment area. In addition, the Specific Plan acknowledges the importance of redevelopment bond funding to permit necessary infrastructure improvements. The central aim of this policy is to set in place a financing vehicle for underwriting ,,.. _..a ,,.. ;,,,, ., gtn ,rtinn an.l associated public design treatments. It will also serve as a tool for possible joint public-private participation in new com- mercial development along the corridor. Rancho Cucamonga activated its Redevelopment Agency with the adoption of a Redevelopment Plan in December 1981. Since that date, the agency has used its bonding capacity to obtain funding for a new civic/public safety facility, Day Creek flood control improvements, infrastructure links to the proposed Victoria Gardens regional shnpnino censer. and a residents ai mortgage revenue bond issue. The City committed to expand its use of redevelopment in promoting community economic development. New project area formation should be among the first actions of the Specific Plan to be implemented; ii should be done within the first calendar year following plan adoption. The creation of a second redevelopment area in ehe City normally would require 8 - 9 months, but this may be condensed slightly since many techni- cal items mandated in redevelopment plans were compiled as part of the Specific Plan venture. Either before initiating formal work on the redevelopment area creation, or during that process, the Redevelopment Agency will need to raise its bonding capacity. This is necessary since existing bonding authority has been almost entirely committed to the projects listed earlier. Legal requirements for preparing and adopting a redevelopment plan for a specific area are outlined in Articles 4 and 5 (Sections 33300 - 33375) of California's Community Development Law•. Key points in those proceeding are: o Designation of a Survey Area 16y Planning Commission or Council) o Forming an Advisory Committee n Salartinn of One or More Project Areas within the Survey Area o Formulating a Preliminary Plan for Redevelopment o Circulate the Plan to Affected Taxing Agencies for their Review o Having an Environmental Impact Report Prepared o Participafing in a Fiscal Review (Called by the County) o Conduct Public Hearings o Preparing a Final Plan o Adoption of the Plan by Ordinance o Transmittal of the Plan to app~o- priate State and Area Taxing Aqencios 6/12187 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES 1 1 1 1 Note that this process includes opportuni- ties for public input, just as the Specific Plan process did. Adoption of the Speci- fic Plan does not in any way commit the City to adoption of a particular type of redevelopment action. Redevelopment should be used in the Foothill Boulevard area primarily for financing street improvements and as- sociated design features. If any proper- ties need to be acquired in that process, the acquisition should be through friendly negotiation, not the use of eminent domain powers. 10.1.2 Infrastructure Upgrading Creating an enhanced economic climate for Foothill Boulevard requires public sector commitments as well as private activity. This will include such items as drainage improvements, street widening, and intersection reconstruction. Marking key entries to Rancho Cucamonga with "gateway" design elements is treated elsewhere in the Specific Plan although it is tied to other infrastructure upgrading. Storm drain and related flood control • . _.... _.._ a-c .... ~~ ~ . -. ...~ _r__..._ Plan infrastructure improvements. In order of possible phased development, specific improvements proposed for the plan area are: al Hermosa Avenue area storm drain (from Deer Creek to Ramona along Foothill) $988,000 bl Archibald Avenue storm drain $2,943,000 c) Hellman storm drains, including connector with Cucamonga Channel $3,372,000 d) foothill and East Avenue $1,809.000 of Friw ands Creak area approximately $3.3 million Funding for improvements number al through c) and e) above will come from a Redevelopment Agency bond issue. (The use of assessment districts for those location is not feasible as the areas are already developed and a majority of directly affected property holders would have to approve district formation.) Since the EtiWanda Creek area will be among the last land areas in the Specific Plan to undergo development, the City will continue its drainage fee collection system and will examine the possibility of either assessment district proceedings or a separate redevelopment bond issue as future land use needs are more clearly defined. 10.1.3 Incentive Program for Small-lot Consolidation The Specific Plan recognizes that prob- lems of traffic congestion and marginal land use are often associated with a pat- tern of small commercial land parcels. Highly fragmented ownership and land use arrangements also seriously hinder plans for renovation or expansion of businesses operating within such areas. Therefore, the Specific Pian will establish an incentive program for small-lot consolidation along the Foothill Corridor. e eete~on ro ~n a nnrf Inf rnn enlidatinn would apply only under the following conditions: a) Three or more legal parcels are involved in the consolidation. AND bl None of the parcels alone exceeds one-half acre in size. AND c) Plans are submitted for a new development which exceeds the combined valuation of the land and improvements on the affected properties. ' g/72 /g7 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES Direct financial incentives from the Redevelopment Agency through owner participation agreements and the use of ' flexible development standards would be used to stimulate lot consolidation and eventual recycling of existing uses. ' These would be applied on a case-by-case basis, depending on the current pattern of development and the proposals 1 submitted. Representative mechanisms for consolidation may include: o Forgiveness of subdivision filing fees o Exemption from filings and fees for variances o Fast-track processing service o Flexible parking area requirements o Modification of building setback, height, or similar standards Appropriate target areas for this program are sites between Grove and the railroad undercrossing, from Hellman to Klusman, and between Turner and Center. 10.1.4 Attraction of Hiah Sales Volume/Market Void Uses A market analysis prepared during this Specific Plan process identified a number cf cil cd ...tiich u nderrepresented yin the~~Foothill Corridor. Efforts to attract these land uses should be made to the extent that they would compliment rather than compete directly with land uses planned for the Victoria Gardens mall and its immediate surroundings. This will be an ongoing implementation activity, having a greater potential for positive results after infrastructure improvements are in place and local populations rise than if tackled early in the life of the Specific Plan, Hence, aitrartinn prominent hp 5ine55e5 Shntdd not be given a high priority until one-to-two years after the plan is adopted. Types of businesses which would be targets of the marketing effort include the following which are now underdeveloped in the western Rancho Cucamonga-eastern Upland area. (Of course, the market potential at some future date will be impacted by the pace of commercial development around Victoria Gardens.) Discount General Merchandise (e.g., Best, Target, or Price Clubl Home Furnishings Clothing Outlets Supermarket Drug Store Auto Supplies (including tires and accessories( Incentives to attract these uses to the Specific Plan area should be tied to performance standards. For example, a major home furnishings dealer may obtain municipal assistance for his proposed development only if sales exceed say $800,000 per year after the first full year of operation. Such incentives could include administra- tive or technical support for the project as weft as possible financial inducements. In such cases, one or more of the follow- ing devices may be appropriate: o Permitting more flexible development standards o Forgiveness of selected development fees o Assisting with background market research o Sales tax refunding In order for this economic development program to he successful, it will be necessary to make Specific plan area sites more attractive to private invest- ment than sites in the immediate vicinity of the regional mall. Using the redev- elopment process, land a55emhly and land cost writedowns may need to be combined with the incentive devices noted above. 6/12187 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES 1 1 The implications of this become clear when the numbers are viewed in terms of a "build-out" condition and with reference to other growth center cities. The above quantity of planned commercial land use translates into 6.52 acres of retail, service, and office area per 1,000 resi~ dents in the year 2010 /assuming abuild- out population of 170,000). That level compares With 5.43 acres per 1,000 residents in Anaheim and 4.86 acres per 1,000 residents in Cerritos. Both of those cities play strong, established commercial roles in their respective subregions, yet have smaller allocations of commercial land use than Rancho Cucamonga will have at it's time of maximum population size. In summation, the commercial intensity recommended for Foothill Boulevard presents Rancho Cucamonga with a most ambitious land use target to achieve. Attracting patrons from Upland and western Fontana to Foothill business is not likely to provide a sufficient base of support. Therefore, the City should promote moderate-to-high density housing development, where possible, along or adjacent to the corridor. iviany Caiii urnia ui iieo 7m.~ f ' `cua;-g development to 6e a vital ingredient in aiding the business sector along retail corridors. Densities of 15 to 30 units per acre are typically necessary for residen- tial land use to compete with marginal commercial uses. This residential intensity would correspond with the medium-high and high density residential categories in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Some combination of financing assistance, such as the use of mortgage revenue hooding, and flexibility in application of development standards will likely be necessary to stimulate housing construc- tion in the Specific Plan area. The phasing of any "infill" housing will be an intermediate- to long-range strategy to be addressed after the pattern of commercial reinvestment becomes clear. 10.2 SIGN AND STREET FURNITURE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT The City will install a Maintenance Assessment District for the Foothill Corridor which will accumulate funds to improve and maintain public and private signs and appurtenances. The funds will be accumulated by charging a special fee for signs In the Foothill Corridor. The fee will be charged at the design review building permit stage, 10.3 FOOTHILL CORRIDOR COLOR COORDINATION In order to induce design continuity along the Foothill Corridor, the City will begin a painting and clean-up program. nli .. :ego ~ .. Lnrrlwan> ctrnet furniture, poles, barriers, signal signs and related objects in the public right-of-way of Foothill Boulevard in the study area shall be painted a distinctive and consist- ent color. In addition, private objects within ten (10) feet of the public right- of-way shall be painted similarly as specified in the Design Guidelines. ' 6/12/87 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES 1 10.4 CITY SICN LOCATIONS In those areas designated as key locations for City signs, las discussed in the Design Planl the City should proceed to negotiate a least cost use of private ' property (i.e., lease, acquisition, etc. 1. ' 6/12/87 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES APPENDIX 1 1 P RIeHt OF WAY LINE CURB LWE W J t•' ~ XW W N A -x- 9 ~-->FD -til M -~_ L O --1E- N (~w1'G'. Acdi+ieua~ ri9Gt•YUrN ~auts 'way be rtUuired a~ Sawr driv<way5 luar '1115 IN~'tf $PC{~~eN WIDENING REG?UIREp AT I NTERSEcTIONS SGC FettoW/NO T~N-E fbR JIMCfF/G oASG>•S H~~rMblt 'C' Rc ~Tc I I ~' Q $ F N _ __ FoQTHIf_L__. 6LVD G L RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CURB OFFSETS REQUIRED AT INTERSECTIONS 1 1 1 neyar ve. rc a ve. a man e. Dimension Grove Ave. East Ave. Etiwanda Ave. Turner Ave. A 44 53 53 44 8 44 44 50 44 C 32 46 46 32 D 32 35 36 32 E 470 390 390 470 F 50 60 48* 50 G 50 50 50 47* ~ H 60 68 68 60 I 60 67 67 60 J 470 480 480 470 K 315 390 500 L 44 53 53 44 M 44 44 50 44 N 35 46 46 32 n 35 35 36 _ 32 P -- 390 390 470 Q -- 68 68 60 R -- 67 67 60 5 -- 61 61 47* T 50 50 50 U -- 480 480 470 Y -- 365 440 --- Atl dimensions in feet. * -Existing; sub,iect fA eventual widening (1) - For Hellman Avenue, T•47* ExbHfH b' ERRATA August 13, 1957 Staff has noted the following errors and omissions in the draft document: "Crape Myrtle" is to replace "Flowering Plum" as the Parkway/Median Accent Tree in the two median island details exhibited in the CIRCULATION section of the Specific Plan Summary. * The following passage is to replace the "urban tree" reference note on the detailed streetscape sketch in Section 8.3.2: " Urban Tree (Crape Myrtle) 30" box. Sycamore Trees shall be used in Subarea 1 activity area." • In Section 9.5.2, "Apparel Stores: b) General" is to be listed as approved uses (X) in the SC and CC districts. RESOLUTION N0. 87-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC iL OF THE C1TY OF RANCHO _ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CNANG"e OF DWNERSHIP ~"""~ AND CONTROL OVER THE CITY FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH~SCOYT _ CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ^`~ WHEREAS, Scott Ca 61e Communications has anon-e zclusive franchise granted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to authorize the cable television system in the City pursuant to Ordinance No. 210 and a Franchise Agreement effective April 18, 1985; and WHEREAS, Simmons Communications, Inc. has entered into a purchase agreement to acquire owernship and control over the Scott Ca 67e Communications system in Rancho Cucamonga, and has requested a change of owernship and control over the franchise; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the request for and hereby desires to consent to the change of owne rhsip and control, with all terms and provisions of the agreement with Scott Cable Communications, to be assumed by 1) Steven J. Simmons, 2) Allstate Insurance Company, and/or 3) Media/Communications Partners Limited Partnership, under the name of Scott Cable Communications, Inc. NOW, TfiEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ..c r-t7 ~cs„~.c .~~,,.. The request for change of owernship and control is hereby granted pursuant to all of the terms and conditions set forth in that. certain agreement dated April 18, 1985. PASSED, APPRDV ED, and ADOPTED this th day of 1981. AYES: NOES: ~lDS E9T: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ~,k.TT42 OF (~F20TE5 \ CCop~ES\FtiRN\SHEO TO A\.l. P~C,eUCa,~~c~T~ COUwsC~l M~~3E~+S / ~LL~ M '. ARK E(j ~- CO CJ E R 1 Ca--r-~-oRaEyt Foa c£~-~r~.~ ~~~-io\o~ a\rrR\c-~ I~riD E-t~i.J Rw1DA ScrlooC D\ST Q~c "C J REQ. _.`-h.\~?ACTS OtJ TF-1E SC}-~pqL S~\sTR~cTS~ i 1-~~ ASSeticC of coNDlY IdrJS OF C~c.\VKT L)J1TN\~ ~ 1-1~, PR~cccT AR£A ~crJo ~K-t~~~J oTN~ o~~cTIONS ~) } ~\ ,; C ~, O G M, i. :a e~InieS I` M -- - •~ r ~ N \ rv .J ~ P :, ~~ ~r \ ~ ~ - J .~ f ? y =. ~ J J /liw-._ ,_,yw~ :~ _e^ i ~ `, r ` w ` ~.,~ .. ,s . f n €. s.;E ~~,~~ s~ ~~ o ~ Western Center on Low and Poverty, Inc. 3535 W. Sixth Street • Los Angeles, CA 90020-2898 • (213) 487-7211 August 5, 1987 EXPRESS MAIL City Clerk city of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 e ~ ~i " ~ d ~ 0 CITY ADMANCSTRATIO~Or(~ AUG 071587 w8t~tiillL~~li~3M1~i8 Re: opposition to Proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 and to the Environmental Impact Report on that Amendment Dear City Clerk ~.~, . .......-.~,~ y '.4...ai ~.: on behalf of my clients, who are low income residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, I hereby repeat and incorporate the objections of my June 17, 19a7 letter opposing the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 and the Environmental Impact Report on that amendment. (Letter attached hereto for your reference.) I request that you make this letter and the June 17, 1987 letter a part of the public record on the C.ity's and Redevelopment Agency's consideration of Redevelopment Plan Amendment t7o. 1 and the Environmental impact Report on that amendment. sincerely, Jonathan Lehrer^Graiwer JLG/jac ~-l ~,c ~,;;~~` f 1 ` `~ ~~ C. J , l ~„ --~. rv .,• n~'or~~~c 'JKirc . '90~. r" 5~ So Be 200 . $o~~~cmenio, CA 9$814 . ;otra d47 woo '~•. !,~;'~` t~~ ~~~~cfi ~:n,cvs ^~ Lc:G; C3f'aG ~®~~~s~; , IrC. .: . 3535 VJ. S~dh Sireel • Lcs Arl3eies, CH. 9D0^^<U-2898 (213J 487J211 ra. s . +::...r „n ~......., ., June 17, 1937 Rc~mn n': ,~:7 mom^ ,ham HAND DEhIVf•:RED na+i..~aru Jurr 1~ 1937 c,.~.-~r-: ~,-., ..~..~ re. .~. ....•. Cay Clcr}: City of Ra r.cho Cucarot:;.z Y. O. Ro;: R07 .,:.:.cho Cccamon2a, CA 91730 Rc: Uppoo i.ti cn to Prcpoced I?c;i ^_vciot•r.„,^r.:. Pi,ui A;cend:,.en'c 170. 1 and to the lir,v i.ranacnt .l Impact Report on that i,:.r_:.d:,er.t Dr. c:r Ct.y Clerl:: On i...:. .,if of °.y Liunt- who are los. co:^ r2.,idc e,. ti;c City of Rancho Cucamonrya, IJherl.~by obi ect to the propc~ed~ Redevelopment Plan Arsendment tvo. for the Rancho Iiedevo loprtent Prninrt and to th„ r.~„1.- .,.+. ..~:~i r...,. _ rG~:.::Gi::y t..A.. amendment. The ba;;es for my objection arerti:e fol l.owirg: 1. Rrdevolopn,nnt Plan Ar~,cndment tio. 1 dot.:; not conforn to the goneral plan of the City o: Rancho Cucnr.mxi%; in that. the Hot:ni ng and Land Use Faement.~ of the ennera'- plan do not comply with tt:e r.em:i rement:; of Government Ccde S$ 65300.5, G5302 (a) and (c) and 65hL0, et eeq. 2. The Rc:devel.ot;mcnt. Agency and the City aro illena]ly expending racnies frc:a the agency's Lo•.a aruA id ,de rate Llcor.o Ho~.~s ing Pund. for titn_ purpose. of repaying thn_ City Lor ,form drains and d r:rinarle :;}•:;tems pursuant to a reimburrc~.;ent agreement ontered into on Junc '3, 19i7q and anondn_d Jam:ntY 21, 1`t37. Such cxj.~~mii turo:~~ nt-c cost racy to the Come"tm iY.y Recicvalopmcnt LdW which ,. i, i_n v,... :~.I ..,, ~.. bc,;:a,ent fors inrrca:;ind and improving thc~~upply of low and r c,nd~a ntc income hnur.i nrl and not for dr,;vn]opinq public wor}; r: which are unrel,N.rd to the r; un ,tr.uct ien or rehabili tat.iun of such h,.~.;cing. t, ~.o- nrn r;ax,~,i ~'~~,; C',Ihco . '. x~0 'V.' SI . o~.di• ^00 . Snnomcn!o. CA 95R h1 . t91 `0 Ad9 n,~,.7 - ~~ .~ ••City,Clerk Rancho Cucamonga June 17, 1957 Page 2 3. Significant areas within the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area are not blighted as defined by the Community Redevelopment LaYI. 4. The increased authorization for taxes allocated to the Redevelopment Agency pursuant to ttea].th and Safety Code 5 33670, increasing the annual allocation limits from $11,255,000.00 to $100,000,000.00 and increasing the total outstanding principal of bonds issued by the Redevelopment Agency fro,i $50 million to $50^_ mil]ion will adversely affect the general funds available to the County of Riverside and other affected taring agencies for the provision of pub]. i.c and social sere ices, particularly to persons and familirs of loww and modere.te income. As a consegL;ence, Redovelop:ne nt Flan A,iendment IID. 1 is not i.n conf arm~i.ty with i:he interests of the public peace, health, safety and o:elfar~. The Env i.ren:n~~ntal I;r,pact Report mist con eider the impact of the increased financing linitr: on the general fm:d of the County of Riv era.ide and ort~er taxing agencies and c:; the effects cn tlrr_ prow isicn of public and social services, particularly for persons and fa~:nilies of low and medc:r ate inca:~e. I requost that this lettor 6a r,•,acio a part of the public record on the 4ity':; and Rr_cievelop;;,e:rt Agency's consider~ticn of Redevelopment Plan Amandmcnf 1JO. 1, scheduled fur considcraticn as Ordinance Ao. 316, and the Envi ronr.,ental Impact Report on that amendment.. Sincerely, onath an Lehrer-craiwer Coun~cl JLG/j ac PS. A fifCh basis f.or this objection is that the Rancho Redevelop- ment Project Area is not a "project arc a" within the meaning of Ile a].th & Sale t:y Code 433320.1. uw oFnces PARKER AND COVERT CLAYTONH >nRNER _____.__.. _. ~._.__~.___.~ SPENCER B. COVERT 1901 EAST FWBTH BT~ET .SUITE JI2 MARL ARETn cNmESrER SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 9T10a CHARLE59 9COUBTICO 1]a19]YPI J] WENOV H. WILES VT RNA R, BROMIEV June 17 1987 HOMAB KRAHELSKI , MICHELLE D ENGLISH ROBERT T ANDERSEN CONSTANCE S, NiCKELL Honorable Members of the City Council and Doard of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Re: Proposed Adoption of Amendment No. 1 to the Redevelopment Plan Dear Members of the Council and Members of the Doard of Directors: REF OUR FILE CE-40 ET-40 The undersigned is the a[COrney for the Central School District end the Et iwanda School District, whose districts are partially included within the redevelopment project area and affected by Amendment No. 1 to the Redevelopment Plan. The mesa ive proposed increase which is proposed to increase the maxtmum annual tex increment that the redevelopment agency could receive from $11,755,000.00 to $100,000,000.00 annually, and which would Further allow a maximum amount of outstanding bonds issued by the agency to be increased from $50,000,000.00 to $500,000,000.00, has sufistsntial impacts upon the Cant ral end E[iwanda School Districts. As a matter of fact, this change will have substantial impact upon all the school districts whose boundaries are within [he project area. The amendment is growth inducing. The City o£ Rancho Cucamonga is developing et a very rapid pace. This growth consists of residential, commercial and industrial developments. Allowing this redevelopment project, whereby additional funds will be received for developmen L' purposes. w iii scce.ierace the rare of growth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will accelerate the impact of growth on the school districts. This growth will result Ln new residences within the school districts, both within and without the project ores. UW OFf IC ES PARAER AND COVERT Honorable Members of the Ci[y Council and Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 17, 1987 Page Two Attached for your information is a copy of a study prepared by the San Franc iaco Department of Planning, dated July 19, 1984, which shows a relationship between economic growth and housing markets. The conclusions reached in that study are equally applicable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is estimated, however, that the impact will be greater, not lesser, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is clear that the proposed amendment ie not an amendment to a redevelopment plan, but an amendment to a development plan. An examination of the areas within the project area discloses that blight, ae defined Sn the Community Redevelopment Law, does not exist. The fact that blight was not challenged legally at the time of the original approval of the redevelopment plan of the City does nut mean that blight exists, and certainly does not mean that blight exists at this time for the purpose of financing public improvements, or to use the tax increment financing for sucn improvements. Enclosed is a copy of a recent opinion of the California Court of Appeal, signed June 8, 1987, which sets aside a redevelopment plan because of a lack of blight. The conclusions reached in such opinion are equally applicable to the Rancho Cucamonga redevelopment plan. The Central and Et iwanda School Districts do not concur a,s to the existence of blight. If the plan is adopted, the finenc ial impact upon the school districts will be extremely large. The coat of needed school facilities end the cost of mnintnining needed school fecilit ies throughout the period of time to which the agency proposed to receive tax increments are enormous. Staff of the redevelopment agency end the City refuse co recognize this fact and refuse to make an appropriate recommendation as to mitigating the impact of such plan and the amendment to such plan. LAW OFfICES PARHER AND COVERT Honorable Members of the City Council and Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 17, 1987 Page Three The school districts would agree not to contest this redevelopment amendment upon the condition that ouch school districts receive, throughout the entire period of time that tax increments are received by the redevelopment agency, 50% of the tax revenues which would normally have been paid to the school district but for the tax increment method of financing, and that such revenues be paid to the school diakrict within sixty days after receipt of such tax increments by the redevelopment agency. This proposal would provide that for that portion of the project area encompesaed within a particular school district that 50% of [he tax revenues which would accrue Co the school district but for the receipt of tax increments, be paid to each school district. The dla tricts would agree that such revenues would be used for capital outlay purposes of their district. It is submitted that this is a fair and just nYYlnm o.~P oo{Aug{no Phu {m~o_n• . r n Phn .{{oP~{nho r. rl the nature~ofnthe project area. Very truly yours, C yton H. Parker ~~~~ CHP/pg2624 Enclosures cc: Dr. Frank A. Cosca, Jr., Superintendent Central School District Dr. Carleton P. Lightfoot, Superintendent Etiwanda School Diatri~t ..., S Uh1MARY OF THE ECONOh1IC BASIS FOR AN OFFICE-HOUSING PRODUCTION PROGRAM Prepared For: San Francisco Department of City Planning Prepnred By: RECHT HAUSRATH 4 ASSOCIATES Urban Economists 1212 Broadway, Suite 1700 Oakland, California 9461? July 19, 1984 SUMMARY OF THE ECONOMIC HASIS FOR AN OFFICE -HOUSING PRODUCTION PROGRAM INTRODUCTION This paper focuses on the relationship between office growth in San Francisco and the City's housing market. It summar[zes the basis for end the derivation of housing mitigation for tuture office building projects. The specific purpose of the analysts summarized herein is to provide the basis for the adoption of an office-housing production program (OHPP). This paper is divided into tour sections. They include the following: • a summary description o[ the relotionship between employment growth and housing markets, • a summary of how office employment growth is likely to effect San Francisco's housing market, • the baste strategy for mitigating housing market impacts, and • the derivation of housing mitigation for office development in San Francisco's C-9 District. •ruF nFt.a TinNSH1P RRTtVRRN GM1i PT.OYNF.NT OROtVTH AND HOUSING \tARKF.TS Stated very simply and generally, there 1s a relationship between employment growth and housing markets. The basis for this relationship lies in economic and housing market theory. Similarly, there is a relationship between office employment gravth in San Franci seo and the City's housing market. The theoretical basis for the generalized relationship applies in this specific case as well. The following points summarize the generalize<t relationship. • Duilding development and changes in space use accommodate employment growth. The growth ct L-u~iness ueilvliy wed employment craefes demand for additional spoce. dew buildings are constructed and there are changes in the vse of space in existing buildings to accommodate this demand. Employment growth means growth of employed labor. The number of workera newly employed equals the number of additional jobs (except in cases of part-time positions or workera holding two jobs). The individuals newly employed do not necessarily work et the new jobs, because there is constant turnover whereby existing workers change jobs. Growth of employed labor means population growth to provide that labor. The amount oY population growth could be less than needed to accommodate the growth of employment to the extent that there is increased labor force participation or a reduction in unemployment, Population growth means growth of households which means increased demand for housing. The amount of housing demanded depends on how the increment of population growth divides into households ( workers per household end persons per hov sehold ). The type, price/rent, and location of housing demanded depends on the.demograp hie and income characteristics of the new households, as well as on other factors affecting financial resources evaileble for housing and housing pre- ferences. u uuautg wnenm nuup uu was w acwmniuuatu greater demand resuit in expansion of the housing supply and in changes in the use of the existing housing stock. Additional worker households seeking housing iri Bally add to the demand Cor the existing stock. There wilt he in- creased competition for existing housing. This increased competition will mean overall increased housing prices and rents. The supply of housing w911 be expendad to the extent that the increased prices/rents cover the costs of producing new housing. This will occur when pric es !rents rise enough to justify in fill housing replacing Tower density development. to justify infill itousiag on sires previou siy passed over as less desirable far residential development, to justify the upgrnding or co eve rslon of slructu res thnt were not being used for housing, and to justify the develop meet of housing just be}•ond the periphery which heretofore had mot 'peen feasible because of its distance from the center and the resultant re l;nively high transport ntion costs, Households with higher incomes will be able to secure their preferred housing. Either they will move into the new units or Into the exiattng housing vacated by residents who move into the new housing. The housing expenditures of the majority of households are inadequate to pay for new housing. The squeeze that develops as these households compete for the now inadequate supply of low and moderately priced units continues until the escalating prices and rents result in a number of households choosing new units, albeit at a greeter cost, to relieve some of file pressure for units at lower prices and rents. This resolution limits the price escalation, but leaves the prices and rents at a higher level than pr[or to the accommodation of the growth. The higher prices also have the effect of cresting pressures to increase the occupancy a[ existing housing (thereby also reducing the demand for additional urdta). This can occur by Increasing the number of persons per household ar by lnereasing the number of households per unit. While these adaptations can occur across many market segments, the pressures to make these Chan gea will be greatest for those subgroups substantially below the threshold prices/rnnts. Piarket adaptations pose more problems Cor those with fewer housing rosources. [f new housing is provided only at prices and rents at or above those needed for new construction, the majority of Lousing cuu~umers must sepses on Itnkages between their subm¢rket (price and location) ;tad the market for new housing. The further below this threshold, the more potential there is that large increns'es in priceslrenta will be requi t•ed before the market linkages finally m¢ke more housing nvai table. Holt scholds with lower Fir.ancinl resources (1) usually have less potential for increasing their housing expenditures and (2) typically also have less locntional flexibility, qs a result, lower income households are more likely to be faced with a choice between lower quality Ituusing or inermsed persons per household as the only feasible adap tenon to the market "squeeze". In summary. the effects of higher pri ces!rents or of reduced 'Housing services (toss acceptable housing conditions et the same, or higher, price) ere generally greatest for subgroups of consumers furthest from the price/rent level of which new housing is provided, The addition of housing units at lower price levels 1 thus a key considet•ntlon in mitigating ttte impacts of the Increased housing demand resulting From the growth of employment. IMPLiCATiONS OF OFFICE EMPLOYMENT CROIVTH ON SAN FRANCISCO'S HOUSING MARKET Even without office employment growth in Sen FranMsco there is strong market demand for San Frnncisno housing and it will increase over time. M1tany households currently living elsewhere 1n the Bay Area have preferences for Ssn Francisco housing. Those who will move into the region in the future will also include many households with preferences for City housing, such as immigrants from foreign countries, in other words, San Francisco housing is expected to maintain its desirability reletlve to other housing throughout the region. The supply of housing is expected to be expanded in San Francisco. However, the private market will be unable to supply new housing for a Im•ge segment oC the population. Although the difficulties to producing affordable housing arise from many factors end exist throughout the region, it is relatively more costly to produce housing in San Francisco than in many other parts oC the region. The high land coats and the lack of vacant land in San Francisco (as well as the resultant need to build at a higher density with associated higher construction costs) are responsible for the relatively high threshold level of prices and rents needed tc attract residential development. For a variety of reasons, the prices end rents for housing throughout the region are expected to remain more costl}• relative to incomes and to other goods and services than they were in the 1960's and 1970's. In San Francisrn, prices and rents will remain relatively higher than those for housing in many other parts of the region. These conditions tviil iikel}• prevail even without growth ip office employment. Prices and rents for housing fn Sant Francisco will be higher with ot(ice nn... L......nn1 .fnnorlh rhnn uri.hnu• t• nLV.......6 ....~ ..11 ..f .,.~ ~JA:.,~~..1 ..._.. ... ...~~. ... ... u.•.u .u ..u ..• .u.. ....... u~uu. ry.. ftice workers will live in San Francisco some of them will choose to do so. Many of the additional office workers wilt be willing to pay higher prices far City housing to save on the time end cost of commuting from a more outlying location. Many of the additional office workers pre Earring to live in San Francisco will be able to pay more far housing rHan same current residents. Those otfice workers who do choose to live in the City will compete for the existing supply of housing. Those with greater finanMsl resources wilt support the production of hmtsing by the private market. Those with lesser financial resources will add to the competition for the stock of housing available at prices and rents below those needed for new construction. To the extent that prices/rents remain below this threshold, the supply of these types of units will not be expanded. r....,....",a pr, ..~n ntn of C::.,,. n^g •.. hill .hi h° h - ~u e .q 2:. ~ cupr~~cies rt'~ incrc;isu, and there will be pressures to upgrade the existing stock, The higher pttices and rents, partlculnrly Cor the relatively lower cost housing in older neighborhoods, wilt have various impiicotrons over time. T}irre will he people wlto decide not to move into the City and existing residants who will move out o[ the City for more acceptable housing elsewhere. There will be many individvels who continue to live in Snn Frenefaco and pay Mgher pricesfrenta for the same City housing. Still others, who ere unable or unwilling to pay more, will accept City housing which does not fully meet their preferences or needs. And finally, there will be owners o[ existing units tvho will benefit to the extent that their housing appreciates. Generally, those households with fewer financial resources available to pay for housing will make the moat sacrifices in adapting to more competitive market conditions. They will have less ability to compete for housing and fewer options available to them. Sen Francisco currently has and will continue to attract a large number of persons that will be faced with these difficulties in securing housing. These include many renters, many younger persons, many of those holding entry Icval jobs, the elderly and others on fixed incomes, many immigrants just beginning a new life here, as well as other poor and unemployed parsons. BASIC STRATEGY FOR BIIT[CAT[ON As outlined above, office employment growth will have impacts on the housing market in San Francisco. Tho recommended strategy for mitigation is to produce housing for the additional office wot•ker house- holds to reside in the City (or fot• households with similar charavter- istics). The intent is that the development of these units will absorb the increased demand thereby precluding its impact on market prices and rents. The private market will supply some of these units, namely those at prices and rents tvhieh cover the cost of new construction. Therefore, the focus o[ this strategy should be on producing housing that the marl:et will not otherwise build: housing at prices and rents below those needed to cover the costs of new emtstruction. ate ~arpose of expanamg the suppty to these lower ranges of prices and rents is to provide housing to accommodate the additional office morl:ers who t~i1t otherwise compete with other residents [or a limited supply cf housing that will not otherwise by expanded. The provision of such housing gill limit the upward pressures on prices and rents oC most hardship to those with lesser financial resources and Icwer housing op eons. The next section explains the derivation of housing mitigation using the strategy rv~commcnded here. It highlights the basic cumulative app conch and provides astep-by-slap sun:mury of the methodology tar deriving housing mitigation, in terms o[ the required number of units and the cost of providing those units. D&RIVA1'1CN OP fiOC1SINC S!IT IGATION 1'pR t1Pg10E BL'ILD[NC 1'LCELQ P?.i!ifiT 'to satisfy tl;c objectives describ^d above, various analyses and data collection efforts were undertaken to determine the amount and type of Lousing required to mitigate the housing market impacts of office building development. This section summarises the derive(` n o[ the recommended housing mitigation. It also identifies the main sources of data and information upon which the calculations are based. 9efore describing the steps Involved in developing estimates, there ere s few important points to be explained regarding the overall approach. Approach Takes Cumulative Perspective Of Crowth Over Time The approach to deriving the housing mitigation for Future office building projects recognises the importance oP viewing office growth within the context of future employment, labor force, and housing in Sen Frnncisco and in the rest of the region. ]t takes the cumulative perspective of a large amount of growth aver time. There are several implications of taking this perspective. One is that, although housing mitigation is applied to individual office building projects, the specifics of a particular project or of the businesses to occupy that space are not relevant from a cumulative perspective. Instead, the net addition of office space contributed by a project is treated as an incremental part o[ total office growth over a Ionger time period. The main reason is that the additional econonde activity nccommodat ed by the growth of office space is not necessarily located in the new building (a firm already located in the city may move into the new building while its old space is occupied by new firms). Even ii it was, tenancies change over time so that the charactetistics of initial occupants are not necessarily relevant. Further, the persons newly employed in office jobs because o[ office employment growth do not necessariiy hold the additional jobs and are rot necessarily located in the new uf!Iee buihiing. Thus, the character- istics of the individuals working in the new bulldtng ore also not relevant. Another implication of the cumulativa perspective of growth over time is that it focuses on ~Ch_a~n gas in space, in employment, and in workers living in San Franetsc" o.~ecause there have been and will continue to be changes occurring over lime (such as in the percentage of office workers living in San Francisco), the speciiics for the OHPP rt•rl uirement must be based on forecasts of future conditions. These forecasts reflect office growth within the future eentext oC employment, labor force, and housing in San Frnncisco ano tthe rest of the flay Arse. The OHPP requirement is developed to cover changes over a rcasonalbe period of time, from 1981 1~~ ?000. Civen the time required hehveen project approval and Cull a aapancy, projects approved in the mid to late 1960's will 5e occupied in tie ]ate 1980's and early 1990'x. 'fbese years Call near the middle of the 19-year forecast period. Further, this lime eerier, was ri~pcor hepage ..t iii _ c ., c availability ..C i380 Census ,into and 1981 survey data to describe baseline conditions, es well as the availability of past trends from Census data for prior decades (1960-1970 and 1970-1980). Although the new buildings will continue to be occupied beyond 2000, it is more difficult to forecast future corditio~s beyond ^ 20-year horizon. Step-Hy-Step Derivation of Housing Mitigation The derivation of housing mitigation for additional office development involves two major tasks. Tho purpose of the first task is to determine the number of additional San Francisco households with office workers. The second task is to determine the price/rent characteristics of the additional Sen Frandsco housing required to mitigate the impact of additional households and to determine the cost o[ producing that housing. Several steps were considered in deriving figures under each major task. These ere Identified in Figure 1. The subsections which follow describe the step-by-step process, the important variables, and the basis for their values in the calculations. The process and key factors apply to all office space throughout the City. The specific numerical vrilues presented are those for office space end office activities in Ssn Francisco's C-3 District. Further information is needed before similar numbers can be provided for City office activities outside the C-3 District. The same approach and same variables would apply to these other areas. Task 1: To Determine the Number Of Additional San Frsncisco ouse o s 1rt tee for ere Step 1: Net Addition Cf ~Offlce Space In the following, housing mitigation is derived [or the net nddi!ion of 1 million grass sq, ft. of office space to the C-3 District. when w .u~ m, u. a: ouuum~ N.vteu, auc ,aa auualaWl W vu,cU apace represents the difference behveen the office space in the new building and the office space demolished in an older (wilding to allow Cor new construction. Since the OHPP applies only to office space, space in retail uses (stores, shops, bars, and restaurants) is excluded. Step 2: Determine Net Addition of OfCicn En~,ployment Net Addition Employment Net addition of Of Office Epnce density factor = office employment 1,000,000 ?09 gross sq, 3,i'S1 additional gross sq. IL ~ tt. per C-3 = office v:orkers -t - tiara] V V ..,strict office in C-s District C-3 1Tstrict employee office space FIGURE 1: DERIVATION OF HOUSING MITIGATION FOR OFFICE BUILDING DEVELOPM1tENT Steps Followed To Determine Additional Sen Frnnctsco Households With Office Workers • Net Addition Of Office Space • Net Addition Of Office Employment • Net increase In Office Werkera Residing In Sen Francisco • Additional San Francisco Households t5'ith Otfice 36orkers Steps Followed To Determine The Additional San Francisco Housing Required to Mitignte the impact of Additional Households And To Determine The Cost qt Producing That Housing • Additional Snn Francisco Housing Needed To Accommodate Additional Households • Subsidy Retivired To Produce Housing In San Francisco Thot is Affordable To The Additional Households SOURCE: Recht Itausrath t Assoctntes 8 The employment density factor applies to future C-3 District ofBCe nctlvitiea end reflects the mix of management/technical and trade/customer service office neHvlties expected by 2000, its application to en individual pmject assumes that the density of employment in the building will reflect the average future density for ell similar office buildings in the C-3 District. The density of 268 gross sq. ft. per office employee incorporates nn average vacancy factor of 5 percent. By accounting for vacancy, it ie assumed that a smell amount of apace is always unoccupied to allow for mobility of tenants. The C-3 Distrtet density factor is der[ved based on analysis of future C-3 District employment and space under the Dcwntown Plan end on data from the Downtown EIR Employer Survey end Land Dse Inventory. Step 3.: Determine Net Increase In Office lYorlcers Residing 1n San ranmsco Ratio of net addition Net increase Net addition of x of office workers in office office employment residing in Sen = workers re- Frnncisco to net siding in addition of office Sen Francisco employment 3,731 additional 2,157 additional C-3 C-3 Distrito x 31 percent = District ofilce workers office workers residing in San Francisco The ratio above Identifies the char, ge in office workers rnsiding in San Prmici sco as a function of the change in office employment. The ratio is derived from the cumulative analysis of C-3 District ol'lice growth hrom 1981 to ?000 prepared for the Downtown Plan GIR. Over time, the number o[ C-3 District office workers who live in Sen Francisco will increase. The percentage of C-3 District office workers residing in San FranMsco, however, ~s-t'orecsst to decline, from an nvcr.~ge of 51.G percent in 1981 to 45 percent in 2000. This is dce to e combination of two factors. Fl rst, future Inbor force and housing growth in San Francisco are not expected to increase in proportion to office employment growth, Second, tabor force and housing elsewhere in the Hay Area will inerense by larger amounts than in Snn Francisco, Therefore, it is likely that an increasing proportion of office jobs will be held by persons living outside of Son Francisco. Tha net cher.ge in office workers residing in San Francisco compared to the rat change in O-3 Di ^!rict cttice jobs indicates that tltc former is likely to represent about 31 percent of the latter fmm 1081 to °000. 5l__e~4: Determine Additional San Francisco Households With OfRce l oar c~ere A' Net increase in ~ Percentage of additional workers Additional office office workers x in households which = workers in addl- reaiding in are additional house- ttonel households Sen Frandsco holds in Sen Prandsco in Sen Frandsco 1,157 additional 521 additional C-3 District C-3 District office x 45 percent office workers {n workers residing Sn additional San Francisco Sen Frendsco households The net increase in office workers residing in San Francisco does not represent corresponding net increases 1n households and housing units. The primary reason fa that an increase is forecsst in the average number of workers per household across ell of the City's households (including both the households occupying the eaistinq housing stock and those in the City because oC additional housing unite). Thus, many of the additional office workers living 1n the City will be associated with greater numbers of workers per household, overall, because of changes in the employment status (more residents work and more workers hold office jobs) of ongoing residents (in which case existing households remain) and because of turnover in the occupancy of the existing housing stock (in which case households nett' to the City replace those who move ovq. The impact on the housing market, however, arises primarily flnm additional households competing for housing unite. Thus, for mitigation purposes, It is the additional office workers ill additional households that moat be identified. ' From the forecasts for the Downtown Plan EIH, it enn be estimated that about 55 percent of the increase in employed fesidents citywide from 1980 to 2000 could occur because of an increase in labor force partici- pation in San Francisco assuming the existing number of households and the exsting housing stock. The remaining 45 percent could occur t,ecousc of housing growth and the net addition of households in the City. If these same percentages applied to the Increose to office vrorkers residing in Sen Fralldsco, then 45 percent of the increase could be considered to represent additional households to the City. This is the assumption for the use of 45 percent in the caleulotion above. B. Additional office ^^kcrs in addi- tional households + in San Francisco Average number cf San Frandsco workers in San = Francisco house- holds with office workers Additional San Francisco house- holds with addi- tional office workers 10 521 additional C-3 1.35 San Frendeco IHstrlet office workers per C-3 388 additional workers in eddl- ± Dtatrlct office = Sen Frandsco tional Sen Francisco worker household households households residing in San Francisco The future average number of San FranMsco workers per household with C-3 Distrlet office workers [e used to determine the additional number of households for purposes of the OHPP requirement. The 1.35 figure reflects expected future conditions in 2000 as derived tram the Downtown £IR Employee Survey, U. S. Census data, and analyses of employment, population, pad demographic trends for San Ftandsco. P.esult: Through the steps of Task 1 it is determined that t tTeee will be 386 additional San Francisco households associated r.2th the edditlon of 1 million sq. ft. of C-3 Dis[rlet office space from 1961-2000. In other words, there will be 0.386 additional San Francisco households per each 1,000 edditiond sq• ft. of C-3 District office space. To Step 5: Determine The Additional Housing Needed To Accommodate AcTil~ltonal Households , A. Additional Snn Francisco households with = office workers Additional housing units needed in Snn Francisoo tv mitigate housing market impacts that Will otherwise OCCUC 6, 386 additional 986 additional housing Snn Francisco households - units needed in San Francisco Percentages needed Additional housing in various HUD units needed in Snn Add•,Hv,^,a( income c;tiegories Franatiscv by HiiD housing x so as tv Ue affordabl e = income entegories eo units to ilia additional ns to be affordable office worker households to additivnal In Snn Francisco households 11 x 20 percent = 77 unite affordable to households with incomes averaging 50$ of HUD median income x 21 percent = 81 units affordable to households with incomes averaging 80$ of HUD median Income X86 additional housing units x 8 percent = Ol units affordable to households tvith needed in Sen incomes everag[ng 120$ of HUD median income Francisco x 7 percent = 27 unite affordable to households with incomes averaging 150$ oP HUD median income x 49 percent = 170 units affordable to households with incomes above 165$ of HUD median income The percentages above are derived from two substepa. First, the forecast increases from 1901 to 2000 1n C-3 Distrtet office worker house- holds in various household income categories were developed. The 1991 household Income distributions ere for C-3 Distrlet office workers residing in San Francisco from the Downtown EIR Employee Survey. The change in the distribution from 1981 to 2000 tvae developed from the Downtown Plan EIR employment analyses and forecasts. The forecast increases in households in vtu•fous income categories reflects the growth of office business activities and changes over time 1n the mix of office activities, each with somewhat different household income distributions for their workers. The charges in household income distribution do not assume any change in the telationship between household incomes and Housing costs. The second step was to compare file increases in C-3 District office worker households in the various household income categories with IlUD data identi Cying median incomes for households in the San Francisco S 115A. The comparisons were done for households averaging 2.1 persons per household since that is the average size o[ C-3 District office worker households residing in San Francisco (per Downtown EIR Employee Sn rvey). The result was a translation oC the household Income distribu- tion into n distribution according to the various HCD income categories. These categories are often used for evaluating housing uftordability. Step G: Determine Extent To N'hich Subsidies {Could Be Required To rP ocTuce Housing In Snn Francisco That Is Atfordnble To Additional San Francisco Households Additional housing units to accommodate additional Snn Francisco households in various HUD $uhsidy (if any) required because the priceslrents that households can afford ore not high enough to cover the costs of housing production f par of prnrii~ning housing in San Francisco thot is nffordnble to the additional Snn Fra.. Cisco house- holds income entegories 12 If produce for-cote housing: (T7 unite x 569,440 subsidy per unit) + (61 unite x 545,600 subsidy per unit) + (31 units x 513,900 subsidy per unit) + (197 units x 0 subsidy per unit) = E9,468,280 if produce rental housing; (77 units x $69,240 subsidy per unit) + (81 units x $50,790 subsidy per unit) + (31 units x $26,160 subsidy per unit) + (27 units x $7,730 subsidy per unit) + (170 units x 0 subsidy per unit) = E10,465,760 Calculation of the cost of producing housing that is affordable to the additional San Francisco households was done in three substeps. The first involved the identiftcatlon of the pr4ces and rents that households {n the various HUD income categnrles could afford to pay for housing, Por rental housing, it was assumed that households could pay 30 percent of their gross income for rent. A gross rent multiplier of 7.5 was then used to identify the unit value that could be supported by those rents. This multiplier was verified by data nn 1983 and 1994 sales of apartment buildings in San Francisco. For ownership housing, it was assumed that 38 percent of gross income could be allucoted for mortgage principal and interest, property taxes, fire insurance, and homeowner association dues. To calculate the house price to be supported by this sha rc of income, the t'ollowtng were assumed: 30-year mort goge at 13 percent .., r,. rr rt. to nrrrrnt drnvnnnvmnnt. nronm~ty taxes st 1.25 nnrcenl o[ price, anal fire insu ranee and homeowner association dues nt $1,200 per scar. The atto rdable rental housing values and the affordable purchase prices were next compared to the cost of product r.g housing. Standard wood frame construction was assumed for antis built for households with mcumes avers girtg 50, 80, 120, and 150 pr, rcent of the 4IUD median income. According to the expet•ience of the dlayor's Office of Housing and Community Devclopme nt, such units can be produced in San Francisco at on average cost of $100,000 pm• unit (1984 dollars) including lend and all other costs of construction. (Costs per sq. Ct. ra age from $100 to $125 for units of 800 to 1,000 sq. Ct.) The diCCe rences be[ween the affordable rental values and sales prices and the $100,000 per unit cost provided an estimate of the subsidy (if any) rr rl ni rxri to pmdure nifnrdnhix huu zing. 'Che subsidies per unit dm-tved from these calculations for households in c~ch of the HUD Income categories are those identified above. For rental hou stn g, sonic subsidy is required for units built for those households with incomes averaging 50, 60, 120, and 150 accent of median income. These ore the groups usually referred to as very low, 13 low/moderate, moderate, end middle Income, respeMively. For ownership housing, subsid[ea are identified for the very low, low/moderate, and moderate income groups. Third, the amount of subsidy per unit was multiplied by the number of units in each group to identity the total cost of supplying the housing. tf no subsidy is required, there is no net cost since the price/value of the unit would fully cover development cost. These calculations ere shown above. Result: Through the steps of Task 2 it is determined that the cast of suppi}ing affordable housing in San Francisco to accommodate the additional San Francisco households to $9.5-10.5 million (1984 dollars) for the addition of 1 million sq. ft. of office space in the C-3 District from 1961 to 2000. This amount translates Into $9.97-10.47 per sq. ft. of additional office space in the C-3 District. Summary Of M1?Itigation Requirements Applying the strategy to provide housing for the additional Sen Francisco households with office workers and the approach of the cumulative perspective oP growth over time results in the requirements for an OHPP that ere applicable to office development in the C-3 District. The OHPP could require the provision o[ housing or the payment of a fee to the City for purposes of producing housing. The analysis summarized herein supports wither of the following requirements: That 0.986 housing units be built in San Francisco for every 1,000 sq. ft. of odditional office space to the C-3 Dist rift and }ha} 1hPCP nnifc ha nffnn~Inhin ,n •hn additional households with ol'tice workers according to the following distribution: - 20 percent affordable to households with incomes averaging 50$ of HUD median income, - 21 percent nCfordable to households with incomes averaging 80$ of HUD median income, - 8 percent nCfordable to howseholds with incomes averaging 120$ of HUD median income, - 7 percent affordable to households wi!h incomes averaging 150$ of HUD median income, and - 44 percent affordable to households with incomes averaging 1G5$ of HUD median income; or That a fee of $9.47-10,47 per sq. ft. of edclitionel office space in the C-3 District be paid to the City spec,flcally for purposes oC producing housing. 14 Comparison To The City's Current OHPP There ere differences between the housing mitigation derived herein end the mitigation derived from the City's current OHPP guidelines. In addition to differences in the variables and numbers, there is a more basic difference of approach. That rernmmended herein takes the cumula- tive perspective of growth over time. The current guidelines focus on an individual project and assume that current condi8ons continue to apply. The results of each approach nre different. In this analysis it is determined that there wiH be 0.386 additional San Francisco households for each 1,000 additional sq. ft. o[ C-3 District otttce space Prom 1991 to 2000. Further, it is determined that it will cost 59.47-10.47 per sq, ft. of additional C-3 District office space to supply affordable housing in San Francisco to accommodate ttte additional San Francisco households. Using the current OHPP formula, each 1,000 additional sq. ft. of office space would generate 0.989 Sen Francisco households and housing units, H ased on the option to pay a fee of ;0,000 per unit instead of building Housing, the mitigation would cost ;5.34 per sq. ft. of addittonal office space. 15 Friday, June 12,~ 1987 i ~ ,8s8~~eWta ~leprat' 3067 Greenberg, Gtuskcr, Fields; Qaman $ Mach4nger,:James.Ed Hornstein; Los Angeles, California; for she plaintiR-appellee!I .•d,wuw L.,.y era ; ..,b a., ,: 1. u1 ,. .L ..I I. LIfI ', .:1, 411v.j:, .. ~ ..i'. ..Qgg~R.,', .nn. '.~r :I C.: uI ' ., er.Il~ ,gip 1. h! The opinion issued March I I, t987,~is unended'Q{ ~fgllows; I . Delde "§ 509(8)(1 )" in the first sentence of first Dara-I graph of st'plioh II and substitute "§ 502(g)(I):" '~~"' `IZ"';~^'; . ....: aq q ,mares 2. Delete "§ 507(a1(7)" from'the sixth ~sentcribe of sho sec- oral pamgra h of section q aid cb{tiro{c "§ 5 fa i)." ',.; P.,, ~ ,. 3.- .,, , P.;~~ .:. . J. Adq "GQliam, 777 F1d u I SOSA6," at trye pod of tAe firss paragfaPh of scctiop II ;Rev "Narhw¢ftgr;,l~t5 F,2d, ~(; 962." ;ddl efhe panel find+thi+cau +Vproprjne for auboiuipg ntPAN4;4rgQ~s9h punuanr to 9th Crt.. a. NQ.pd F[~R•nP~..,R•~!h~ :L,w 2pa:b1: ^Rononble Wieum B. shtick 1r..,knior,pnjlpd SSpW.RyRjfSJ9dISfI for we Nonl[erg Oµuisl of,Gllr9fgy„uSµpg,(ry,QBy16Qk9g.pt,; • • rbttr, :, r'.eM y.,;,..: ,.: r.~l':d),o e: 9,J 0111 ^U!ea-,ie:a:.~ ,u'nl ,: v, n'...... or.:,.I .,, ,: a: ~ , ~.nb_ :med~.i r,o .;'s ~~.~.., ..., !L,:n,u l,o:dgn.ln .:U„ Redevelo meet Plan Is'Re ersed''~ r: ' For I:ack of BlightR~ ~i{y~yJ'g'ed,"';;t;;;:~;i~ " 7J; FP ~,. t. Cite as'87 Daily Journal,D.A.R: 3057', MARGARET EgIMING('ON;.,; „Ie,; •, ,„ Plalntirl.Anroilam ..Y ,... ., „,.,. . .,..,,, sounn'o cou,NTy dEDEYeN9Ph}~(r'~' ~ .`, , AGENCY ET AL., ~, :: ;,,.7.1 ~,.~.. .. „ Defendank~RedwpdeoL6, ,;x„ ' Nc. A071527 ~.. Super, Ct, No. 86410 '. ,, "+lilornia Cowl of APPeaI I ' ` ~. , r Irst Appellate Distnet ~ . , , ~. „. Dlvulan Fivc ., Filed June 0, 1907' , , " Appellant htargarct Emntingtnn appeals a judgment vabdabng the C6lhnsvilie~hlomezuma flills'~Hedevelopenl Project i^redevelapment plan") invnlving approximately 10,350 acres of land in Solana County prm~o my devoted to agricultural use.I The ' m!ave:apment plan prnpcees ilia dm~elopmenl o(walerdependenl '~ mda.4na1 uses . n UIe proja l area, including the possible eonsirucv' le,n m . ,iilRn_,I r _ _ ........._. °!:: p:i.^.^. ~:!.~S a..., n..... rrvL'vclnpmenl pla n was approved by respondenD $olapo ('aunty ItMrvrlopment AGenry and the Solana County'BoaN of Superv n~r~n m vin anon of Ike Community 1{egeveloPent Lgw (llealth'I &,tiaf '',•le, § 93000 et snl 1 and the Califomu Enviropmantal' I Quably Art. ilhib &aourees COde,S71000etsN.)rWe'reverse;- lav;nq roncludsd the record Ixlore us does oat rnntain substam Ua I evuienee demonstrating the project areais bB§hled whhin the mran;ng of the Community Hedevrlopmenl Iaw.,'~'la:ol fn'.+u'n„ 1'hr srtlwp for 1 he ndevrlapment plan D a 10,750 acre slle in I !hr ~.:n,ncorfnra led ,h' ~'er:ma Hilo area of Solana County The ' pr, ~11><: a era is bounded genrrolly on the west by the Sbkun'Mersh Pro[ectson Area, on Ne north by Talbert lane, and on the south and east by the Sacramento River. Within the project area, mast of the land u held by five large owners. Soulhem Pacific ReBway owns 2,000 aC[PS; Pacific Gas and Electric Co. owre 1,060 acres, Dow Chemical owns 2,80D acres, Wells Fargo holds 500 acres In Inrst; and Dozier erd Pressley Company owns 2,060 acres. These owners lease mast of lhelaM far dry fazming,a wim farms averag• ing 000 acres in sva. ~~ v'''The project area also induda the towns of Collinsville and Birds landing: CalgtuvBle caruists of approximately Z! acres and L['located along the Sacramento River. I[ was once a small fishing rnmmladty, but is raw a einglefamily residential area with a rwmbaof vacant lots. Buds Iarldin6 mruisu of rdtghly eight acres and includes boN single-!amity homes and sevc:al neighborhood cmunercial operatlom. With the ezceplion of Cogauvi8e and Binds tang; 1Mre'u very little development N the project area. ' ~ The project area is distlngszished rest so much by im rnndition asby its location. Heing near dse Sacramento Riveq it u an ideal IsicaUon for commercial development -n Tact which has not gone wusotited. The land within the redevelopment project area was described by planning coluWlants "as one of the last Bay region opportunities for the development of large~scale, waternnenled iodustrY. 1:'~;'."Four years before the area was slated for rcdevelop- ment~, it was targeted far development [n August 1979 the Solana area plan address ly, Prlor Lq the adopliop a(the area plan, the 10,350 acre site which WpuiQ eventually Gecome.lhe redevelopment project area was deBigrsaled plimas'By faragricdlural use. After adoption of the area pWn, land use designations in the project area were changed to i0dude wate[depEpdepl industrial and commercial recrcauonal uses, ~.. 'q'~ However, (he expeclM development of the area by private im duelry failed to materialize In 1987 respondents began to coaieer the Community I[edovelopment taw as a means of slimulatinv acvelopment. Un July 19, 1903, the Solana Countp Boats of Super visors parsed a resolution declaring me projttt arcaaneeded ~ludy "to determine if a redevelopment project or proleds wdhia the area are (easible.'I Al This point there were severe bme comtzaints imposed on Ne prorrdu:al steps necessary to adopt a redevelop meet plan far the project area. HeaIN end Safely Cade section 73320.1 had been amerdcd eL`echve January I, 1961, to limit the use of the redevelopment process m arras Unit were "pmlominant~ ly urbanized."s Thut, after 1987 i which was less than sa months away) the project area could not Ue sublecl to a redevelopmeN plan hecause a did not nicer the sUlctory regwrements A rrdeyelopmenl plan was submuled to UIC Boned of Super visors describing the condition of the project area as^bhghted " 7hn candaion waz based primarily on the "lack of adequate public improvement=, puUhc fanli Iles and uhhties lp serve exlsting and planned development," and the fact that nta!ry properbe' ;n the project dlea were subject to floabng. The groomed redevrlnpmnnt __ ate,, an Ir, - u ioiunaud cost {tu,wgWm. rad~hne reCOrLSINChon (pstimaltd COST 511,960,61161, and ConCIRIP tion of a deep draft shipping berW l estimated cost J9d W,6W 1 The plan further authorized the redevelopment agency to Install and eau Wet public improvements, puUlic faclliues and public ulddles needed far plan Implementation °`e plan provided that the redevelopment agency could acquire real property located in the project area thrrough the power of eminent domain ISee Ifeahh 8 6af'fade, S 33037.1 ' ~~ [.ilea mast redevs.apment plans, the pnmary source of rev onus to repay project cats would be from tax mcrrment financing. Through the use of tax increment finannng, the assessN value of BK property is (Nun as shown an the lane ~~ sessment roll at the ~705g lBailq'~§ppeaate .;Rrport Friday, Juna 12, 1987 time the redevelopmeal plan k adopkd, Future ipCreeses N ptp; pertY taxes rsuaed by improvement' MWt.pq tl{e project sik are paid to tae redevelopmeat agencY.to paYJhepriacipal mdiatalrpt an any irdebtedrress incurred by the redevakPrpwl agency (1L CY lofinaatt ttreproposed prolecta wf§p fjga/klyl a6sistaPS? hopl caunlY, pkk and federal governmenla; pNPtAY IAh rgefCplept'i interest income; redevelopment bonds; loap6;too.any othpt, source,! It called for Duet ft9p miUipl jn pojegk, k 4P completed over a•BPyear period. The.pian corwltided;;'It]he t;ali(arnlal redevelopment procec5 is pecesaary b telnovp the Dlighling fact, tors which are haderurg the fuU ecawsnjc utiliraRaa or rile Iapq„ ,1 Afkr holding PuWc pearipga,7 tae lkplfq of SUPerYiSOrg apprpYo~ ed the redevelopment Dlaa on,l'kceurRer r3, 1983, .: ;~:,. . .The epvtronmentaleffactp o(IhCprojMt romppoeat'~werCagra dressed in a fivrpege laipal Study„The Initial Study poncltrdal! Ilwt 19 txialing environmeat'l Impact rcporla apd .WaaaiaH t6a7, Ne Board of Supervisors made (iMlrrgs NdW rapRct w,thq, signiflCant epYlroMlegtel UnpeCt' pf tae rydDvr30pment prpjeC{,; the Ieasib)e mitigation measures, eM 1he,pyrRrdjpg,pggjdprylri tiom it frJ[ ilutified Proceeding with tee prpl(Ct•'„ +, ; 0671 ,t i:,,~,7 On January l3,t%4, appellant filed fheiuslint achan, primari•I ly alleging Ilia Droject area was cwt a proper' arts for redevelop•~ meet and tldl the environmental review practss weslnadequate^ After ilia trial court deniedretie4 appeWnl noticed Ihu ppPealr ' Before o project area can properly be selected for redevelop-~ meet'under the Community RCdevelopment Ldw;~it ~'muaf bet blighted. In fact, the bbghted mndifion d Uro area t' the very basis of the redevelopment agency's jurisdiction W ecgwn tact properv ~ ty by eminent domain and expend public (Weds fpr i{s rodevelop meet. (,SCe gweetwalpr Valley CIviC Assq, v.!=11y W NaROn81 Cltri ;19761 16 Cal.3d 270, 7f7; County of Sxala Crua v, City tN Wa4on•, - uLAPpJd ma, o,a,l l7w term"blight"has neveh been dehced wiW preC~sion, trot can it be. However; the IegisialurC, and courts have provided some guidelinrs. A (wopart lest t' m' quwcd to substantiate a findmR of blight: First, tiro area mustcon-~ stitule a "serious physmal, social 0.r economie burden on Ilia comr; munity which cannot reasonably be expected k he reversed or; alleviated by private enteruriseactingalone,"Secondly, ate pf thR; characteristics o' blight as set out in Health and Safety Code sec lions 330.71 or 370:72 must a%isl.~ 1Hesllh k Sat, Code. § 33030, em•' phases added) ~ ~ • To qualify as a proper subject of rCdeVelopmen6 a projectarea, must "be blighted waen considered u a x'hole.'!, (Requs v. Clly of Italdwin Park, supra, io CaI,APD~~ at p. 961.1 Conditiam W bight r must "predominate" and must "mJtp'iously affect Itte entire ~~ep't Healm h Sat. Code. § 3371y Regan v. City of Ballwin F!prk, supra,,, ,, t p 961.1 Only a "compelling economic need", (t}cderNopment; \Grncy v. Ilayes :1154! 122 C,aLAPD.2d 171, 793) CanluabfY usipa :^." ""x:rcnhr,a,-> Wwh"of rmroainpr/;nn(, ;h.'qus Y. Clti vi naiAwin Party, sups, at p, 979) An agency'p I'Cxpecklion 0.f. rconarnic improvement and Ilia prospect of;pcculatlve gafa'Lfv7~~ ni5h nn ;reufhcient bases (or the use of the powers of ,. ~ nu• rzdrvelapmrnl ^tryut v. City of BeldWln hark. supra, at p. 980.j, Ay w c nre reminded rcpealedly by r8tpaxknts we mint uphold : hr L;.Amg ct 6.'ght ;(supported by sulA54ptial evidence. ISee In er I;rdevelnpmrnt Plan for BUnkef Hilt (19W1 61 Cdl,2d 21, 39J„ I Inu rvcr, tl:e Supreme Court's tuianirnpm drotsioa In Swee{wakrb t aliry Civic ,lase, V. l'ilt' of Nalloe~l Cily, supra,~16 Cel.3d 770, Armonslralr, the! a tinAmg of blight a pot roncluslVe, The Cam~~~ mums Iteelcvdopmwn law has established (adorn k be con•i emu eJ m Je4•rmmu,g wbelher en ores is bligbted, and it u {ha'. court's role to amore dtose factors are taken into account. to short, the cowls are rpgtrireq k be more than rubber stamps for local govermrcpis. /n Sweetwater loo Supreme Court reversed the decision of a City and iB redevelopment agency declaring a 134acre gol(course m bo a baghled area and approving a redevelopment plan to put a 90-Wilding shopping cenkr in iLS place. The goV course was sub• jecl to Bonding and the driving range had been closed (or repairs for u long as three weeks due to flood damage. The value of Ilia 4ard was depressed rnmpared to oNer parts of the city, and tae property was encumbered by numerous public and private easements, making privak development "infeasible." fld., at n ZN,j NeveMeJess, the Supreme Cowt pointed nut that the golf course remained "marginally profitable" and furthered the legislplure'e policy toward preservation of openspace land. The Court concluded the goU close was not blighted bmause the elleg- ed blighting (actors had "not ended its present economic use" and therefore, dre area did not meet tae criteria for redevelopment. fIDIdJ Af4r reviewing the Iedialalive scheme of tae Community Iicdeveiopmenl taw, the Sweetwater court made severe) perunenf findings, First, and most impeAanlly it stressed Ina) "the [.egisLturc made clear im intent shat a determinetimr of blight be made - not on the basis of potential alternative use of the propos~ ed ores -but on the basis of the area's existing use." i td„ at p. 778, emphazis added.) Second, Ilia mere fact Ihal a project area exhibits a blighted cardidan, such as flooding, does cwt automadral~ ly bring it within the terms of IhC redevelopment statute. The pro- jest ama must corsdtuk a serious economic or social liability. I Id„ at p. 719,1 Third, the caul stressed That the redevelopment statute slwWd not be used "just because the Dublic agency considers that it can make a better use or planning of an erne Bmn its present use or plan." (Id„ at p. 778.) The delermipation of blight in (he instant case was framed in atatukry language. The Board of Supervisors Iound the project arna ~~^^^^-,-::,::.. ,' .. aulsuuer from ecorwmm r v.,q,a uow dislocsbon and douse" because of the existence of (U Iois which are subject( fa severe Bondings and (21 inadequate public im- provements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities. (Former Hrahh k Sa(. Code § 330.72.) The Board found the "elimination of blight and the redevelopment of Ilia protect area cannot be reasonably expected to be accomplished by private enferpnse ac Ling alone ...." lNealW & Sac Cede, § 3:1032.) Furthermore, Ilia Board concluded lheprojecl area cantamed"physical somas and economic liabilities rcgwnng redevdopmenl in the interrsl of the health, solely, and general welfare of Ilia people of Solano County " t Health & Sat Code, 4330.72, 3.7035.1 These findings were based in large part nn the rMerelnpmenl agency's report to the Board of Supervisors concerning blight m the project area,'fhat report slated "lalll parcels in the prole'! Area were dekrmmed to be bhghtM clot to the lack of pubhe im~ provements, facWUa and unhhes needed to carq~ out provisions of Ihr [acre plan:." Needed ir,:rasiructurx inriunrn • .mma!cca;;x and improyemenl of existing roads, industrial road cor6trucnan, raB low SWisWClion, deep wafer accrus and berthing facdiurs, and sgwpge facilitjes," (Emphases odded) The report noted th:n "(§ ICgaa to most of Ilia area is pwr to nonexistent end infr;rolruc~ htte h Inadequate to serve planned industrial use." (Emphases ouRd It was plsostressed that sub. ~nual portions of the prolrct arcs lie wilhbr Ilia 1W year Band plates of the Sacramento River anq Yeripus,creeka and are subject to floading.'° There roes evidence shpt the levees protecting We project ores from Oording are dekrioraling aad That the cosk of mainminenR them imposed a burden nu properly owners, Out at 171 parcels m the projtel area, 18gxhibiled some form of s We Wrel blight ° As previously nnled, dK redevplapmenr agency condudM "f llhe CalJorna redevelop r'tta^r,.auno,y2, issr r@aijn 11ppr1h4;;Beporl Goss added.) - „y~,.ii?tdi~n`~.,r U one adopts Nis report's (rarge q('pNpeppp; agd'es'a(ptilgs any sizeable rural area for a highly intensive iuduskial use; Rre land wRl invariably be !Dube b be bRghttd, What 1? nl1"s)!~ (gam. Ne redevdopmenl agency's report arW from the rettld fatten as, a whole W evidentt Thal Re asserted blightingcondiRoro eubstan-' Rally burden Ne existing uses of the area for agricWU~ue,""' "" There W ao showing w this case tbel the ocraciowl Dogding end lack of infrazWCture has rendered Ne land stagmnt or un• produclive,'r To Ne contrary, a study o(WtW use Nkrpatives (or We project area slate "these lands era rat marginal agricWtwal larWs ... Herr productivity?ntl efticienetes egmisMa Web wiN other agncWturel areas ta We region,"Tttis repoR Soea on w sWta~ Nat production comparisons wiN olherdry lapel (armigg areas jq' California indicate "that Ne planning area may be oneof Rb mass producuvp." (Emphasis added.) There W no evidence the land W dropping in value or that Ne property has become'a seriouu, economic burden b Ne taxpayers of Rm county. The redevelop it cannot be dewed Nat Jhe projec{ ateq, 7yadd. m~ed roads, levy repairs, sewage improvemenW,,. Nere V qp showing Nat Ne lack of such improve@pats have un•,i dWy hurdenetl the existing agricWtlxrW use W the area. Li !tie words i of $weetw^kr, there waz no showing Ne hlighling conditons had "ended f thq land's] present economic use." (Sweetwater Valley,` Clvk Asso. v. City of Natlopal CItY, supra, 1B Calk al p. 779.1 It should also be noted that URs agricWtural Wed prpvjdes Ne, statuNrily-recogWred bene[iW of providing open spatt, heaIRJW , and nutritious food, end an economic resource b the stale. (GOV. Code, § 5(220; seo Stereo Clpb v, Flty,tw §{syward (1961) 28 ~I.3d BsO,.B` 861.1 ~~..~.:~ ~, .., .~ ~ ,. ., .. .., '~ Overall Ne tiu3ut of the iNarmetion wmp8ed on the project i area u Nat Solano couply wi8 be imturoved U tbe WM is Arvemrcvl for water-related industry rather than allowing it to remain in . agricWtunl use. While Nis determimtlon might be pertinent fo^ Ne edoptlon of Ne area plan and to ehanges jq land ju¢ designa- borisfrom agricW Wral N industrWl, it is urelevant b e determine- llon of blight. ISee Sweetwater Vtlky Clvlc Atm. v. Clly of Nn- tlanal City, sups,l6Calk at p.271.778; Rcqua v. CItY of Baldwin Park, supra, 10 Ca1.App.k at p. 979J ~ . h(oreover, it ss R.~ declared policy of Nis state Nat even though' Ne area is blighted d shoud not he subject to Ne redevelopmem process uNess rMevelopment coWd not reasonably be,expecteq, by private enterprise acting alone. f Ileallh & Sat Code, 4 33032.1 The record reveals Nat Ne vast malorily of Ne project area is ~ already owned by large, w¢R-financed private interests, Tlje fact that private development did not occur immediately q(tef the Dro- jar! area's change ta Wnd use designation to permit WdypR(al uses a nnl nrcessanly due [o a need (or puUlir, partlcipalion and ass~s4a nee, We may safely asswne these corporations are holding L"~ .:.,,'r .. r'.,u, mad.. ;opm--,-~~ ,2y sidl tiey5iup ji Wh}n They In conchuion, alNough Ne project area exhibited some of Ne mnd~tions of blight enumerated ta Ne cnmmiWly Redevelopment ~' law, there w u no sl:owmg Ncee conditions hall aubstanlially in- Irr(em' u i th Ne'and's present agricultural use or Nal Ne conN- Iwns hod rendered Ne project area a serious soetal or'economic uabihty In Ne community. Instead, respondenW'~have admitted lorthnghtly Nat Ne redevelopment plan was devjsed eml adopted as a funding mrchenism b "tmplemrnt" the area plan after am bcipatn! mduslnal development tailed N occur.xs In oNer words, 'he nroni reveals Ne ,irs ~9opment process was being utilized iw! ~o overcome blight, but to overcome problems allrpeting in- duetry b'Ne'area:~~Such a purpose rs msWhcient to justify uNeashing Ne'"extreordaWrypowers"of redevelopment, (Regml vi~Clty of ealdwW Puk, supra, 70 Cal.App,k alp. 979.) -rvi Although Ne conclusion Nat the project area was not blighted na.'esslWtes reversal W Nejudgment and makes resolution of Ne rennaiNng issues unnecessary, a few general romments on Ne en-~ vironmepWl review process undertaken by respondents are in ozdec~AppelWnt reWes a number of technical deficiencies under Ne~Califomia Environmental Quality Act ICEQA). (Pub. Rraources Cade; § 21000 et seq.) However, her overriding objec• tlm caMerns respondents' use of existing environmental impact repots (ERGS1 arW pWnning documents b arralyre the envuonmen- lalimpecls of Rre redevelopment plan. Appellant claims Ne pro- cedw'e employed by respondents [ailed to inform Ne politic and governmental dxisiw makers N the envronmental consequences oFrarryurg put Ne redevelopment plan. ~'ICEQA' was enacted by Ne Legislature to ensure "Rwt en-' vlroomeptal considerations play a significant role in governmen- tal dxisian-making." fCOnttrntd Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. Ozud Dkl. AgrlcWlunl Assp. (1906) 42 Calk 929, 935.1 CEQA is. essentially an environmental fWl disclosure statute, and the EIR W the method of disclosure. (Root Landowners Assn. v. City Caun-' ell (19631147 CaLAPP.k 1015, 102oJ An EIR "demonstretefsl to ep apprphemivecitizenry Rol Neagency has in fact analyzed antl cotzsidered Ne ecological imDlicadprts of its action." f No Olt, Ise.: v. CI{y of Las Mgeln 119791 13 Calk 60, 86.) A redevelopment plan falls within Ne scope of CEQA. (Hea1N d Sat. Cade, § 33352, solid, (i1J "M EIR submitted to a redevelop meet agency must serve as Ne'eWrm bell' alerting Ne agency b potenRal adverse environmental impacts arising from projeeta dsigmd to improve Ne environment in blighted areas." IDusek. v. Redevdopm<nl Agency 119851 173 CaLApp,k m29, 1036-1037 t R Is ugdispp{eel that In Ne instant case a formal EIH analyzing the environmental effecW of Ne redevelopment plan was neither prepared ear submitted (or public review by respondents. flesMndentt mntend hnwovar ghat ihu o~.~~. e,.r,l quences of Ne redevelopment plan were adequately anllyzed by, various planning documents and EIRs already in existence. // " CEQA Guidelines establish lhatan agency"mayuse an ea71er EIR prepared in connection wiN an earlier project to apply o a, later project, U Ne urcumstances of (tic projects are essentially Ne same.... f t{loweveq it must find that the environmental ef- (ects pf Ne projects aro similar enough to warrant Ne same lreab menl..~..;' (Cal. Admin. Code tit w, § 15069.1 is In admmcstering its respomibilities under CEQA, respondents prepared nfive-page Initial Study concluding that I9 pronously prepared EIFts atW plain sing documents spanning Ne course of eight years adequately ad~ dressed Ne environmental imPads of the redevelopment plan. These l9 documents contain well over 2,000 pages. Some of the documents deal wtN rela(iVely general subjects such as the area plan; other documents discuss speedic projects such as Uow Chemjca!'s igialed punt proposal. The sass majcnty of these documen's analyze aengrnphir nrrat murh Wrger tea., Lh¢ In 2c~ ogre redeyeiapm¢nt project area.'rhe Imhal Study makes no at- tempt to summarize the anticipa(ed environmental effects of the redevelopment plan nor does it make an ntlempl to cne specifically where Nis information can be found. An inlerest¢d cthzen is fac- ed wiN laboriously sorting through over 2,W0 pages of raw data and Nen drawing hu or her own co fusions about whreh in(or- matioo is pertinent to this project's likely' effect nn Ne envirom meet, Assuming arguendo that respondents were entitled to rely an ezWting envirronmentaldaumentation, et a vrtr n,itlmum lhny should have rnmpileu "ail the relevant rmvronmentai data into a single format report, a procedure which would facih4rie boll: public input end Ne decision making process." ^iussipn 11111 Im. plsvement Assp, y. Board of Permit Appeal.. ,1974: as Ca: App,k 8060 ~ailQ',AppeWte ,'Erp,nl Friday, Juue 12, 1987 lsg,169; see also Cllireaa Asaa. far nSeWbk DeYlelopmeol of 9{akaP Area v. County of myp (19&5).177 CaIApP.7A A0117A•177J _''dll The Supreme Calul has leCdltlS'sh'CSB011 d14'i,'PZZYdeBedpow> tlon' that mP.mbere of the WDUc hddin (hP CEW pzocYSa,!!,(Gao- cerned Citiulu W I:au Meu, laC, y.?aM Upb AuteWwrat Aaaa.. copra: u Ca1,7d at p. 9)9.1 And. ae o4eadv ipoleate0 Co1pP1199cC with Ne EIR provisions of GFiW luveb,{4e jtnpprtAR{ fupCGDo of enablln8 the Pubhc w make an'.'kldeperideW, peaavxd jmig, ment" about s Proposed Project, (SUWgo CWWtY Wa W Dhl„v.. CoanlY of Orangt (19911 110 CalAPO.Od 830, 0741'These tau7ysrA were W served by Dw procedurca emploYtd by rcapopdePw. T7M Initial sway in this case provided the pWzlic with Im lneaoingfW opportlwtY la learn the e1lVUatmenW'wWequerlceel of idle redeveloymenl project. if anything, the ahar,buR of rPaterial aA IntP.reeted citizen was referred W, wiWWt qtv' gutdaucn aPMW(. W proceed, carved b discpirgBG mtha.than mwrraBe.Par'tiCiPa' uon in the Dublic review pznCrse. In awzunary, neiW4'. the pro cedlue followed by respandepls,POr,tIM OPPOfIYnitY (nt.Cl{iiEaiDn. Put was sufficieN wcowtilute sldrikatikl.compyWKx Wjth thecae: quuelnenis of CEQA. , 1 ; m..y :,.u1L, n>;f: .]a:: I,iL1 .. The judgment t5 rever3W./~:u^.',d~.v:.'I ,ra ns'••,lulll, .<.:I „ ef(rl ,. it We concur', ,.. ,. „r,,., „i~ f.~:FG, J. LOW, P.J. ., .. .,:.•,^hy,/. ~: t In rf,d ~, KIND, J. .. ... ...' a.u.l tm,' Iq ,n._ „1 ..IJ. ,,.,., ,17 .a6 I I ADp<II<nl wN P' T<!I! °:InN IL (IfrRlipnN„l YN, Sa• YPMnW b t44 LD' yuuruDU Pqv~ mriLlun<rllneelfb nppJaNl YtyRdrlFlWrlMatd WM'j 3 xuDOMmu ua nwa w wu .wul er rlmlutl,..rwn(W~Sdmno c..,l I' •1' .w•+ol.m oupr. u`Nr~~m t.l +all~yil~ ~~~ ~,fmur„u ~Mllw us.tlemlu. u L' r, orr kfmin u e N+I,wi Drowµ ql P!!pNYt'A4"ji90?AP.!/,".~f.,''94"'na lane a m vnq>LOn d feruLuLm I•. / me aoiml •ne mnutm d Ile iD,su w Dr.<I4Mr po.O purtuuV b,4~ .,.. p.c la vn4<aepmul mpu•4w ,a, ,:r'I~'i'.', nil ~~ s IkaIN a +Iny CoM emnm WrD 14O Wn nmepyd alzub h,nary i.' Iw, b Mi,.• • ~ nrnlxl nn." u. 'p~lmlwnUr abaft fir a..wmuWty .rvrn u. dunm•m; . Imamlal e,a otl W awMp?<Fta W pnvua~q~y propMr ~n I4 pro/rl a In• N• bees a u !a wpp,rw. e Tw mN,elMVreM tvs. N/ M teen v:lLwt 14 aitb.'ll,r NW L, IVr W mveme• mdrr.n,rn f Ines caw b n<nan, Imwoa em,wnl DY^DenY now Ira Dnle<t •,v nl • loo •e •r. n.W«mmt w Wlnoee wlealr'.'. r a Iwo rW,a' Irr lYOiv(t•n•n14r YUnin mylnbHra W,Ilp. alWmlrW nYmYM Ve~ wkinva In >lir •(I nr• au,M•• 'fh< imnrau4 ulwn •n ll,a wb,dana ra•r. Peinlmnlyl<ixnNNe4ry•)<n •,W(MVmaw mLlls gYYb lp• vVr,[I>ra.IrM •r. r<yulrtn IGpr IM mrwr mm..M4.D"~ •~:~.a396'.,~a• ~. -.:-"•'h4Y, w.,..ra enee. IM..I F.eM. ... HdM L h•r/er l rn,. No<.Y ~LeY•en;W IoW Pr,Warw la w PDJ, 11'.nn<I~l 6A rd. i'V^t ll,i )'FI '. '.I"CP _ - T I I: •pP•n I4 Jama a,akvelop UW pm)rt •rM lu/, a arP PvL olrlpOY, r N.rol•n,n<tommrol..•>aui4p rry,mr r+an ran uale letter lo- ..,q ~rcw ^nw~~v io aoa.. Drelaup.~ms'4 ..,awlualai,l,md anDeaL t'r'^ilmlw~ mnVi>el^,;em. rortkrelopmeW pao NOOttn •ppVVtl.•rd carunen4 volJp ~.r mrve V^1"rlr hcl drttd b I41w14ufYa nan'.19`r0art In IN pote<t YM ' n IInIN•M Llriv rok,mtien v01 c41a: "R aua.e errs IWn[MI•nOi nr ,rrc ee•,'<IVe d,x„IOi,yn aM•IruclJa, Ueda IaalOtp b stogie Ilnry Mm: e l.. n.nna' n.rr. rurpu,a•ny mmabtlm aw<naa,.nia,Nldll ,- uY•'<m a.uer 'n ,wn wlpou. •b en emAK+u b W Wlla, Uaamleam tl ,nbni ~ ,,, „maWnr,, ~,,..r~,~~: j<I~m„<~ur em <nme bul,.n d w W a e aM91aIN1 a W fale.4e1 I.rlr ....,n,... urnen•4 aunnaapnruul afaap[Ilm.ItI ILI reWty'~ < i r<I Nlgn armrzy a Irwni+lim.m Mn~ rmuaum. hna. amuum, open nw.a farce, ONmael,m,,naplO•um, mood .ppraven HmIN.M Srelr Pode>M,m mmmn rlnml ' r 'rb W44uva.mn,bn Nulu uN Sletr cane •ttllw vmx<lleclire Jnnu>.y I. lea, u,Nete Mmiry u • <n.re<twp<d bamell IW. !o Foeaot• pn P>/e 10 Pr.DaWrn4 tM IedIY <mP'W'•~ tM ,easl,ve <Ifttu d nood,nq m 14 /aWml• d ranp.va eoJ euO• I.nault. W41IMr ovuaot u I4 re<I out Inns v<rY gllleN.,rv<aarlr Ivl•mmm,n Nltr nDW Itloo tolM mkvetopmenl Prore<I !n alnl tl ueir•wry oga•wm, nn, tom d eolllrorllk •aE a,N• V,aro „en n~ aoVal f~ W pnln,N Omuta prep a Uu pmpaeM Don. ii sau<lunl aunt ... aerlMa u na„w umu erlxllnre •w, newin<eMe, eneniroem, minpWeam, mom cILL+c4r erW Wlurla u•a. It n a euaup Lr elDka Pum<n» Ib,den4 d Mpuwm• HOa caul au~ nlpea nootYla unnclwaY44sriruibl.mnen "i)au,oul phut wanwm ammlaYb,lfa Inrd ueOla try 1•mu,a, wa[F nn 4 nwe•aadp•d m mW W nfla W lips ns' atbelOr. 6Oa>M awmc tleLr4 can moron Ile •al.. V.4WSeO. ueremp nraW Uan4vebmu.<rtl euen W ntd<vaopnenl vluM NN nnen .4Mand lm INWO/ b4YY ume4kd b Je [,NIYm d Ue Dmle<I •n. Pe,Ylk nu f ltl ele ctrle meldaN aw4m1,N a • pov pool m tae I,paal Dorton ale a4pl Laermioed,l ru wwlae "aupnniy da ukwl nos t4o1e<r,rueal ans.."N Irfl Uo. CTemkal CanlunYpWa<E Wldp • pam m.u ].r00 •nenia 'ITY D•WaLl.r VIaW.rn N IR/>14/. prat. 4d.M IYW,[.L•1W alalb YtYn w mrue•ry Dwmiu. me Laco olania canw'r D•Wneell4ill4ue Dom m LmD .an eEieaDt b a,o oor qa 41 ore pwo>W vu ulUrdnu in IP1r OUe b • pnl«IeO wulacl<my In,NmfnOla Ue prmun Simtarly pau b sue e.r' mw m.l,wD car. uu.ee arapD.p Drwwr em.,.e a.aren< mq@tlva N ye m4rtetpuu. II rlsPmbole lure rMe4OlY nrglxd INI tb'uOpllm d Ne RMnnepment Pon v,IGbW b N mv<Ibn . nJ(am>LOn •nJ ynlJ Impl<menaLen of I4 aera4lY Olreuae0, nW,u4d and •JnpaO Area Pan. T4 Hedev<iownen, Pan uuN> Ijmru caul l<aeve'wo.neni i•.n ~evu.wi„urv mm~r wi~.iw.. pnv.u p.> par b 4 aW r,an m pnm tlvman Ur pYp d emlrlml ndDnln •rW e•IWa~ M UnoYW toe r,Wrelappol •ga,cY u • prlvu Oev<laer, •n •I wLia up„w, a LN<r dlvvael.o4d. nfennn bCF.QA CuIJ<lilv>m thse In Hlal heron .W,nlae A.1o0. Il,e Nb m nhtd, rtapvtlen4+'<n rrylnrd b wm{Jy vIN IM I~ •ngmama, lsn pmem s•y c•I nnmm caNUl u,i lSm,, wean nl>,a ~~, ~., '1}IdI Wm,: $Uperlar ('Aar{ County of Solana 'IYieI Judge: Honorable Dwight C. Ely Counsel for Appellant: E. Clement Shute, Jr. Fran M. I~ytan ' Ehrabelh il. Dodd lauric E. Kermrah ~Shuic, iriinaiy & Hemocrger 796 Hayes Street San Francisco, Caliornla 'iii01 CopnsCl for Respondent; Charles U. {amorce County Counacl for Solan..;ounly . , Splano (:purity Comthaue . ~, Fairfield, California 91777 R, Bruce "oppeq Jr. Weiseq Kole, 8a9mer A RerWran .110 Popular Center. 751 South Spring Street 1.M Angeles, California 9pOt7 ' LET-TER Orr OPPOS 1T ~~w7 FRoM'. Wp£.ST£RrJ CEYJ'~EYi ON l.~W a I~ O U E 2"Ty , Z~l C D P.-~'D'. MANE 1'1, 19~' S «B ~TE.C 1 '. C ERTA-\YV 33s~c ~ ~ ov.~ S T~ T11E p~i..~E~r» rwE n1~T $As~~ l,~'Po~J ZT•1~ F+.~TS o N ~n-~ ~ ~.~ FS d 1~ £ F2-S ~+.~ S o"F t,. a W RYJII n w o CJ E'P .Pr~C'E - ~ co ~-t~- ~mC65 Uiestern Center on Law oncJ Poverty, Inc. of me 3535 W. Sixth Street • Los Angeles, CA 90020-2898 • (213) 487-7211 City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: opposition to Proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 and to the Environmental Impact Report on that Amendment Dear City Clerk: On behalf of my clients, who are low income residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, I hereby object to the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 for the Rancho Redevelnnmcnr rro7ect and to the Environmental Impact Report regarding that amendment. The bases for my objection are the following: 1. Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 does not conform to the general plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in that the Housina and Land Use Elements of the general plan do not comply with the requirements of Government Code §§ 65300.5, 65302 (a) and (c) and 65580, et sy. 2. The Redevelopment Agency and the City are illegally expending monies from the agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for the purpose of repaying the City for storm drains and drainage systems pursuant to a reimbursement agreement entered into on June 18, 1986 and amended January 21, 1987. Such expenditures are contrary to the Community Redevelopment La•~•r:hich rey^uiras that ,ponies in the iow and Moderate Income Housing Fund be spent for increasing and improving the supply of low and moderate income housing and not for developiny public works which are unrelated to the construction or rehabilitation of such housing. ~„ ~ . n, d ~ „ ~~ 200 • Soc ~.rmenfo, GA •581%~ . ~, .1F r:i 07" .1~ City Clerk Rancho Cucamonga June 17, 1987 Page 2 3. Significant areas within the Rancho Redevelopment Project Area are not blighted as defined by the Community Redevelopment Law. 4. The increased authorization for taxes allocated to the Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Health and Safety Code § 33670, increasing the annual allocation limits from $11,255,000.00 to $100,000,000.00 and increasing the total outstanding principal of bonds issued by the Redevelopment Agency from $5o million to $500 million will adversely affect the general funds available to the County of Riverside and other affected taxing agencies for the provision of public and social services, particularly to persons and families of low and moderate income. As a consequence, Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 is not in conformity with the interests of the public peace, health, safety and welfare. The Environmental Impact Report must consider the impact of the increased financing limits on the general fund of the County of Riverside and other taxing agencies and on the effects on the provision of public and social services, particularly for persons and families of low and moderate income. I request that this letter be made a part of the public record on the City's and Redevelopment Agency's consideration of Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1, scheduled for consideration as Ordinance No. 316, and the Environmental Impact Report on that amendment. Sincerely, / a % onathan Lehrer-Oraiwer •// ,~~ counsel JLG/j%ro PS. A fifth basis for this objection is tF.at the Rancho Redevelop- ment Project Area is not a "project area" within the meaning of Health & Safety Code 833320.1. ~- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 17, 1987 Dennis L, Stout, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Sase Gine Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Dennis: Po.i Ocoee Boa 001, B,naro Cu<unony, CJ,fomu 911J0. X11 d~ 9891011 I understand that the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency will 6e considering various amendments to the City's Redevelopment Plan at a special meeting on June 17, 1987. The Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation discussed the general conrept of the RDA plan and unanimously voted to aupport the amendments recommended by the City. The entire Board wishes to emphasize its strong support for the use of RDA funds for facilities which are to be "shared" among the entire rommuntty and which ultimately benefit all residents cf Rancho Cucamonga. On behalf of the entire Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board, I would like to extend to you and the City Councilmembers our support of the Redevelopment Plan and our hope that all future RDA funds will be allocated toward those projects which benefit the entire community. sinr..e rely, r~JP.anhe $. Ddrtnn, ` Chair Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation JSB:ML:Ir ec: city Councilmembers Lauren M. Wasserman Jack Lam ~.,..,em.mrc,i IkM~,:nh V prnwn 1cRrey Km0. r", ~~„w,r„ I n~n-.v ~~ ~. ,~ fhatl<J Bugnei ll Pamcla 1, WrlBhl LmrzenM Wexenn an e o f YM -~; ~~-,f~1 August 6, 1987 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency; Attached is a report dated July, 1987, by Gary E. Strong, State Librarian, outlining tha deterioration of the quality of school Libraries in the State of California. The examples given in this report exist today in Rancho Cucamonga as in most of the state. If the Redevelopment Agency is looking for efficiencies in municipal dollars invested in community library services these dollars would be better spent outside of the school system. One large, well equipped multi-dimensional library offering such features as computer access from each school will do more to meet the needs of the school population than a dozen poorly stocked school libraries staffed by kind volunteers. Through cooperative planning for joint use, the proposed multi- dimensional educational center could furnish the resource support for the core curriculum tnat the scnoois require but cannot provide. Such a facility would be an asset to each and every school in the community. In Rancho Cucamonga we have a unique opportunity to design and plan a facility tailored to meet the identified specific needs of the schools. I urge you to take advantage of this opportunity and begin the process by adopting Amendment 1. Sincerely, ,~__ C Olane W.i lliams President 9191 aaae Line Roed, R~n<6o Cuc~mong~, Cellfomia 91730 p~q 98TJ10'/ ';:~~CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY-~ NEWSLETTER Gary E. Strong, State Librarian ISSN 0276-6973 July 1987 No. 79 STUDY DOCUMENTS DESPERATE CONDITION OF SCHOOL LIBRARIES The Department of Education's Special Studies and Evaluation Reports Unit recently completed a major study of the condition of library media centers in California schools. Superintendent Bill Honig commissioned the study at the request of school library professionals. The report, entitled, "The Crisis in California School Libraries: A Special Study", documents a situation that library profes- sionals are keenly aware of - that libraries in many California schools have deteriorated in staffing and collections and thus are not adequate resources to support a strengthened care curriculum. The report, written by Department Consultant Barbara Brander, concludes that "the school library is the neglected stepchild of educational reform". The Department's study was coordinated with a nationwide study. Consequently, the California results can be compared with those of other states. California is in the worst position of all 50 states in terms of having the largest percent of school libraries operating without certified staff. Collections of books, periodicals and audio-visual materials are inadequate. As a result of these conditions, many school libraries provide only minimal check-out services and cannot actively --rr nnM fhn in.Mn,_rH nasal ~ _ _,- California's school libraries rank below the national average in money spent per pupil for books ($4.76 for California as compared to y6.24 for the natf on as a whole), bur school libraries also lag behind the national average in terms of pupil participation in library skills instruction. The report notes that "a major effort, as well as a significant infus ton of resources, will be required to reclaim school libraries as vital learning centers". In addition to calling for more monetary support for school libraries, the report contains the following recommendations: The California State Department of Education and State Board of Educa- tion should coordinate development of a long-range plan to improva library media programs in California schools. The long-range plan should lnfl lid P. prmisionc for providing library Staffing, facil it i,"c, and resources as well as the library media services that should ba routinely provided in elementary, middle, and secondary schools. Continued... C AIn ORNI A STATE l IBRARV ~ r.O. BO% 94]837 ~ SACRAMENTO, CA 94 2 3 7-0001 -2- School and school district planning for library programs should be incor- porated in planning for the total instructional program. The school library media center should 6e viewed es an integral part of the instruc- tional program. Thera is en acute need for collections of fiction and nor fiction books, periodicals, and other media to support the curriculum. Local educational agencies should develop long-range plans for providing library media services that include making available reference materials and services designed to encourage basic literaep and support for curriculum. Decisions about staffing school libraries and developing library media collections should be incorporated in the plan for library media services, Professional librarians should be employed to provide professional services. Library collections should support the curriculum. Schools should avoid becoming dependent on PTA's, volunteers, and dona- tions in planning their library budgets. While donations may provide welcome additions on an occasional basis, funding school 116raH es is a district and school responsibility. 3 r:l E~~ June 17, 1987 Chairman Dennis' L, Stout Redevelopment Agency Chairman P.O. Box 801 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Chairman Stout: I wish to express my support of the proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Plan which the Agency is presently pursuing, I have been a resident of the City for two and a hal f years and have seen the City prosper in a number of ways due to the Redevelopment Agency activities. I feel the Agency and its proposed projects will only help to further enhance the community, cultural and rec re ationat assets of the City. I am sorry I can not attend the meeting, should you have any additional questions please feel free to contact me at any California 91101 A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT T0: The Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Board. SUBJECT: Amendment to Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Plan. Dear Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Board: We wish to express our interest and support in your Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. We encourage the Redevelopment Agency to continue to strive for improvement of the community through the continued public-private partnership which the Redevelopment Plan provides. We encourage you to use the Redevelopment Plan where appropriate to implement various City plans and policies in a public-private partnership. specifically, I call your attention to a couple of matters which may be considered during this Redevelopment Amendment Hearing. The Redevelopment Plan can help assist in the implementation of the Foothill Specific Plan, such as improving areas which cannot be done alone by private development. Another nxamnte vi Redeveiopment assistance that can be provided is in implementing an area wide utility underground program now being considered by the City Council. In conclusion, we encourage the agency to favorably consider the Amendment of the Redevelopment Plan and also consider these proposals in their actions. Sinc rely~~ L/~~ /1 imothy/d, eeedle` 17%////. Vice President A.H. Reiter ^eval.npment Co. ec: Lauren Wasserman BXecutive Director Maning ,Wdress P.U. box 7250 • Newport Brach, California 9285&7250 • p141 751-0594 Pullman at Redhdl ®®~~n~1~ ~n~ V P. O, 00% 35 • 6613 AMETHYST ST, • pANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 17141 987-1535 - April 24, 1987 Carlton Lightfoot, Superintendent Etiwanda School District P. O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 RE: Rancho Redevelopment Project Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 Dear Mr. Lightfoot: The Foothill Fire Protection District has reviewed the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Plan Ammendment No. 1, specific to the fiscal impact upon our fire district. The following finding is submitted to you as chairman of the Fiscal Review Committee VII UCllp 11 UL [UV Ltl111 L11C b1U LCLLl UIf VISLLIUL. The fire district has an existing agreement with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It provides redevelopment increment for capital impzovements, equ~i nment, and operation/maintenance costs of benefit to the project area for fire protection services. The agreement is the only financing mechanism currently available to the district for long term financing of capital improvements. The ame rdment will allow the district to meet its capital improvement program goals consistant with residential, commercial and industrial growth. Our covr.rr.i nc board of directors has reviewed the ammendmant and inuica ted their support due to the posLtlve YLSCal Impact it provides the district to improve the leveh of fire protection within the project area. r~ ~ ~' Carleton Lightfoot, Superintendent ~ ~ ~ ~ .f April 24, 1987 Page Two i Please accept this letter of support on behalf of our` fire district for inclusion into any recommendations submitted by the Fiscal Review Committee. Sincerely, ~ p~//~f LCJ~ Dennis _M~ ei ~Lo~ Fire Chief LDM/ss cc: Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors, Foothill Fire Protection District DEPARTMENT OF TRAN~ORTATIONI 1 COUNTY OF SAN 9ERNARDINO FLOOD CONTROL(AIRPORTS ~:~`l' i7'~~f~ PU9lIC WORRS ADENCY _ 825 East Thlyd Strest Ssn Bernerdlno, CA 92415-0835 17141 3972900 _ i~ \~1 /%/~II11\\\\ MICHAEL G. WALKEfl Director April 24, 198'7 File: 8 (CTY) -98.13 Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency ~ F P.O. Box &17 n,F~'9ary C Rancho Cucamon CA 91730 "~~ "'o C / ~ ~ F(o~y or, D n ATTN: Linda D. Daniels ~/~ "'%~r cNT gy,~ Zone 1 -Amendment to the Sanlor Radevaiopmant A,U,yys t~~i9 ~8 '~'F"'v'o~adevelorwent Fian fur tl.e ~/~/~/ I9e~ Rancho Redevelopment Project Dear t4s. Daniels: ?7~~3Q~py ~~i6 We are in receipt of the Preliminary Report$on the Redevelopment Plan for the Rancho Redevelopment Project Amendment No. 1. The project is located within the Flood Control District's Zone 1 and Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan No. 2. Day Creek, an existing rail and wire reveted earthen channel, traverses the east portion of the project area in a north to south direction. This channel is only interim in nature and no*, considered adequate to handle flrnrs £rom a major storm until permanent improvements are constructed. The Rancho Redevelopment Pro,)ect~, with tax increment monies, proposes to finance the design and cot>,struction of Day Creek to its ultimate improvement providing 100-year flood protection to adjacent and downstream properties. Also located within the westerly portion of the project area is Deer Creek, a Flood Control Facility operated and maintained by the District. Deer Creek consists of a rectaneular concrete lined channel designed to provide protection from a 100-year frequency storm. Since the Facility is maintained by the District, annual maintenance costs are incurred. Approximately $65,000 is spent yearly For routine maintenance of Deer Creek with an additional X35,000 disbursed in storm maintenance. Routins maintenance costs From 1987-88 to 1991-92 are anticipated to increase at an average of 2.6;x. Projected over 40 years, the increase in routine rmairtene: ~.^,e costs would he t04~. it beoomes obvious wYy the P'iood Control District has a:;ked for and received the pass-through o£ all tax increment so as not to sever^ly impact our channel maintenan^e program. .n.nk ycu For the opportunity to review the amended project. Should you have aqy questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned at 387-2525• Very truly yours, ~,( GC1 ~a..u^~ JACK W. KRUBE, Chief Planning Division JWK:Ai,3:ub ca: Char Lin L. Teird, Reading File li al ter 0. We1is, Administrative Analyst rancho ~'ucamon~a CHAMBER OF COMMERCE .twin I I, Inp] nrmli, ,91 out, Chairman nnnrlin t'urslmnngn prdrvrl opmnnl: Agrnvy I', n. Ilex PO] Fnnaho t'UCnmonga, Op 91]30-f1F01 Prnr hrnni n: 7365 CARNEI-IAN STREET, SUN'E 130 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 TELEPHONE: 71A1987~ 1012 nn npril 15, InR/, Ihr Rnnrhn ruramongn Chnmbrr of Cmnmrrnr han rrl ~~r I+irrcl m's mnni mnuslY npprovrrl I:he rndnrarmrnt of hhr prof+anrd nlnrnrlninnl to hhn Rndrvrlnpmrnt A9nncy pl nn In incrrnen Ihn hondi nq rnpnri by and hhr hnx incromrnt limi 1, w~~ fort this nmrndmrnt. will hewn miry pnni ti yr hminfits In hhn bgai non: :ammunrly Im' yrnrs hn rnl,ln, ^inrrrrl y, I I ~ ;r. _~" r ~;i j?% ~ ~ ~, ~/ ,.~-, I'IrSirtnnr Llin:~ , ~, I,nn rnn Wa.^,nr Hann In. ~ Lam ' kLLcIC:SD c.:......a ~~ ~ ., _... , r v ; JUN 17 ~~ ~-_~•-.;.r.:_r;rr.-_ ,y June 17, 1987 BAI r~'j 71~1~'I:~;li;wll~w f.~'~GIG Aid ., ._ is P ~ ~ 4 !7 r~ ~-I Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency I ~`~'~~)i6H~hi~I'4"I~ 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 9,1730 Attention:Jack Lam, Executive Director Re: PROPOSED RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLAN AMENDMENT NO.1 near Sir: I am the owner of approximately 15 acres located within the redevelopment project area on the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Baseline Road (Assessor's parcel number 227-091-045. This property is currently zoned medium density (4-14 units per acre). It is my understanding that within the proposed Amendment No. 1 is the provision to exempt certain residentially zoned parcels of land from eminent domain proceedings. Looking at the shaded map desiginating the exempt parcels, it is apparent that my property is one of the few residentially zoned parcels in the redevelopment area that will remain subject to eminent domain proceedings. Whereas, I fully support all other portions of the Amendment No. 1, I would ask that my Property be also included in the eminent domain exempt category. If the Redevelopment Agency does not feel my property can be included then I believe that portion of the amendmenr jenc~~~~.Li.-.y O^1° ^°~-ta7^ other properties) should be deleted in the interest of fairness and equality ox the Puwaio of the Redevelopment agency. I'm sure the Ae development Agency recognizes the importance of the development of the residentially zoned properties within the project area and desires to insure and encourage the same with an as^, urance of protection from the authority of eminent domain. I am also sure that the Agency is aware the development of my property is constrained by the General Plan which designates my properly as residential. The Agency must also be aware of the stigma of being one of the few "unprotected" residentially zoned parcels in the project area, surrounded by eminent domain exempt properties and its consequential effect on the Value of my ,^_r i~y and desireability to qualified developers. Ayain I request that my property be included in the eminmit '~ domain exempt category as identiLied in proposed Amendment No. 1. Sincerely, ~ / / i ~l i LLL ~~~ Raw.nmvi Kanokvechaya r.t ~i..i IO iac~ ~~ roaa~~cnN ace Deuelapment lnc ^' i' a ~ a s .:. 1, n , ,,„ , ~ i ,.... .. ., ..: i {~: +E Q G I 'i ~ l7 :r;,~ .- -.. .._ra.rsn~^v August 3, 1987 AM P!.7 Jack Lam i;B:A:'.u;1L121L?,;R.^;"i6 Director of Community Development P. 0. Box 807 ., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Jack: BCE Development Inc. has been informed that on August 6, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Redevelopment Agency will consider the approval of an amendment to the Rancho Development Plan. This amendment, when approved, will allcw the Agency to continue to address the conditions of "blight" which are prevalent in the Project Area. As owner/developer of industrial property in the Project Area, we are keenly interested in the continued redevelopment of the area. The removal of impediments to proper growth, by providing for adequate infrastructure, increasing safety and circulation. and elimination of underutilized properties, will ensure that the Project Area is developed to its highest and best use. For this reason, we support the appzoval of the Plan Amendment. Sincerely, -'yB/C~rEO~/D.Ey/V/ELOPMENT INC. ~~ 'U ack H. Co gan / Vice Presi ent Commercial; Indus tr'_al JHC:js THS CARYN COMPANY ]St4 TFRRY ROAD, UGUNA SUCH, CALIiORNIA 97651 ., 1714) 194-7541 August 4, 1987 Mr. Jack Lam Deputy Executive Director Redevelopment Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 `;%~`~F/ ;:~~~^~~~1X pC0 e 1.9„p o I '~c)~ ry'~'7i234 ~~ Re: Rancho Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 Dear Jack; As a grope My owner within the Redevelopment Agency project area, I am in favor of the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the degree that it will help provide comtnunity and cultural Facilities and improve existing sub-standard infras±ructu re which will allow orderly development of the redevelopment project area. v.. ~ ~..,,t.. Joseph :\*. UiIOrio President JNU/jaa P. S. I'm worry about the tardiness of this letter - 've just returned from V EteatlOn, MARLHHROl.~6H nE VELOPMENT CORPnR4TICIN August 3, 1987 Mr. Jack Lam Deputy Executive Director City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Lam: On behalf of the Marlborough Development Corporation, which has developed residential property within the Project Area, I wish to express our support of Amendment No. 1 to the Rancho Redevelopment Plan. The programs outlined by the Plan and its Amendment will he1F to correct substandard conditions which exist in the Project Area. In correcting the infrastructure deficiencies many of the impediments which have resulted in improper land use utilization or economically declining residences and business will be eliminated. The Amendment No. 1 will also help to provide community and cultural projects which will help to enhance the socio-economic environment wi t.hin the Project Area and «~.,, .. _.._ __.........=ty. I am sorry that I will be unable to attend the public hearing. Please accept this letter as Marlborough's support of the Amendment. Very truly yours, MARLBOROUGH D ENT CORPORATION M.tchael J. Rom o Vice-Ptes dent - Corporate Planning„ .. i _. ._ - i /my ... ..... .,~ cc: Donaid B. Edwards Paul N. Byrnes ~~ -.i 196 ~'A P!d ... ni ., inf., ...,.~..,., .. ~., ~ ., ... /: August 6r 1987 Mr, lack Lam Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Lam: I am a resident in the Ranchc Redevelopment Project Area and I wish to let you know of my support for the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Rancho Redevelopment Plan. I feel that the projects being proposed by the Agency, both in the existing Plan as well as the Amendment, will greatly enhance the community and eliminate the problems that the City now faces with flooding, traffic circulation and traffic safety, and fire protection. I also wish to express my support to the Agency's participation in developing community and cultural facilities which are needed in the community as well as the Project Area. I am familiar with the programs that the Agency has developed and participated in. As a resident of [he Marlborough Villas development, my husband was able to purchase the house through the Agency's first time Single Family bond program. I feel that the Agency does have a positive influence in the community and encourage the Agency Board to continue its redevelopment efforts. I am sorry I will nul ue auie iv cnk„caa wr ouy[.J rt ":: ~~::.^.t =t the August 6, 1987 hearing. Please accept this letter as my support for the Agency programs and the Amendment No. 1. Sincerely, i ~ ~ __... 'Peri Schlegel 9829 Mariposa Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Califo[nia 91730 August 6, 1987 Mr. Jack Lam Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency P. 6. Box 807 Aancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Lam: As a resident of Rancho Cucamonga I would like to express my support of the Agency's proposed Amendment Mo. 1 to the Rancho Redevelopment Plan. I think the Agency is taking a commendable approach through its redevelopment efforts in trying to eliminate the substandard infrastructure conditions that were allowed to be developed under County authority. I also feel that the Agency will be successful in trying to improve the quality of living through its community and cultural projects, such as a library, theater and recreation centers, which will benefit not only the Project Area but the community in general. I am sorry I can not attend the public hearing scheduled for August 6, 1987. I do wish to emphasize my support of the proposed Amendment to the Agency Board. Sincerely, v~~~' ~'~ r.~~"t"e~v en Ka bel 11325 Mineral Peak Court Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 ~~e ~1'ILLI 1~I LYU~ ~~im~~rr~ BSdO ARCHIBALD, SUITE B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 17141 980-22dd R[CEltor_L7 _.~~ ~l'~ _ , 19Ei July ~l, lvn~ AN W..! 718~9~Po~Illlfllf2t'~~:`lo Nr. .+ack I.am kedevel oomen[ Agency Ci[~' of Rancho (',uc amon2a kanctto Cucarn+nga, (.a. 91711+ Urar :.ack: Wo nave :eceivvd no[ice of a join[ pa6l is hearing ec heduled for Auhus[ b, :~+tl7 Benue en c!m Rancho Cucamonga Ci [7 Council and Re!i~=vel opmen[ Age nce, for .he pu: pose of con..=.;deri ng an amendment [o :.he Ranr.ho Rodevrl opmen[ Plan. 'de would like l0 cake '.his oppo rt uni t}' eo F=xp mss our aiq~pnr[ to: [nr amendment. w;e helieve cha. rha pro jeccs idanci fied in [ha Redrve lopmen: and [he p ropo ved amendmene are necessary in ordrr for the project area and the h.~,_ '.:ry ;u Jcv=•1„p s his,hect ar.d c vs~•. Tha prnvi si on of Oul [ura and Community Pacilf: to F, Park Pacil is ies and upgraded street imp rovemrncs ro [he project area will provi Ce much needed public +,.~+:~.,.~ t~~. rh,• rrsl dente of the Cicy• ddaictonal ly [hr cons[ruc[ton oI [hr R:.K Tonal Flnod Con[rol Fa,ili[irs includad In [hr pro~ec[ ama dill of irni na[u s:=r+,n:v flood hazy rdti. Por rho rr ra~.,ona ~.~~ hr l+ovr Char [h~ ~~+: op~~svd umo nAau~n'. dhnuld ur .:np r,~v...d. I're` I~• \I.ln~l ,i~ REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT «< `' ~ ~ ° Stephen Daniels commercial brokerage .. •• ~ 'r Apr• pl.~ 71~19L~%;:!121~!%'i'-I~C~16 August 3, 1987 Mr. Jack Lam Deputy Executive Director Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Rancho Redevelopment Plfln Amendment No. 1 Dear Mr. Lam: I em writing this letter in support of the Rene ho Redevelopment Plen Amendment No. 1. As a resident, business owner and property owner in Rancho Cucamonga, 1 believe the amendment is essehtiel in assisting the city in providing sorely needed public safety improvements such es fire stations end Ylood control. As a protessional in comma rciel real estate brokerage end management, I know that this amendment will allow many acres of underutilized land to be developed ,u iie L1s List and best use. In many cases, whin this land can be developed commercially, this will mean greater sales tax revenue to the City which in turn will lead to a higher level of city services with no extra taxes to our residents, If 1 may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, - !, Steve N'heetley ~' SR':pr Fi~1d1 U., ,n nVgNUE SUfTE 200 RANCHO CU CAnn Gfv GA,CALIFORNIA 9~T30 71 ~:';dBOfiftfB Augus[ 4, 1987 Ms. Linda Daniels City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 C. Rasat; ne Pyd P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Linda, As a partner in the development of the Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center, we wish to express our support for the proposed amendment to the Rancho Redevelopment Plan. We understand that this amendment will allow the Rancho CLCamonga Redeveiopment Agency to continue the programs which have been iri operation since its organization in 1981. These programs provide for the elimination of conditions which prevent the Project Area from being developed to its highest and best uses, including inadequate circu la[ion, lack of public inq~rovement s, and flooding conditions, which have resulted in property damage, injury, and even the loss of lice. i~he ~^agm tulle of these conditions requires a coordinated effort in order to deal with them adequately, which can on iy be supplied through an Agency such as yours, ['or this reason, we urge your approval of the Amendment. Sincerely, The Hahn Company f~J.c..,,~. Ci, <5.~..~~i.~er Duncan Bud ingec Project Manager Development DEi: bs •~, it ~~l..ll,~,~il... Ir. ,, me 'nn ,n Ui~, ~i ~l tl~~nm _r. !.li r~P~lie Lm, August 11, 1987 T0: The Honorable Mayor, Dennis Stout, and to the Honorable N,ember.s of the City Council, Rancho Cucamonga, California. We, the undersigned property owners and electors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and who reside in the area of 6006 Klusman Ave „ of this City, respectfully present to you the following facts and petition you for appropriate relief: 1. On or about August 1, 1987, the new owner and/or occupant of the residential premises commonly known as 6006 Kl usman Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, caused approximately 20-30 dilapidated, inoperable, and otherwise junk cars, to be placed on said property. 9 4rrarhoA heYPrO and incnrnorated herein by reference, are several photographs which accurately depict the current appearance of said property. 3. The property owner/occupant has been contacted and asked to remove the vehicles from this residential neigh- borhood to an appropriate and suitable location. Said owner/occupant refuses to remove the vehicles and maintains the vehicles can be legally stored, and that said vehicles are owned and possessed by him for the purpose of restora- tion as his "hobby". 4. The Petitioners are of the firm belief that such storage is: - ULILaWf\ll - 'hai ii vOZa rot ^f^ R-' zoning requirements in accordance withv this City's master plan; -1- August 11, 1987 Page 2 b. Unlawful in that said occupant is and in all probability operating an automobile restoration business for profit in an area that is not zoned commercially. c. Unlawful in that the conduct of the owner/ occupant is in violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions (C, C,& R'.s) which are recorded in the office of the County Recorder of this County. d. Unlawful in that the conduct herein complained of is: (1) An attractive nuisance which could lure young children onto the property and could subject them to an unreasonable risk of injury; (2) Creates an environmental pollution hazard through illegal and unauthorized discharge of lubricants, fuel, and other hazardous chemicals which can and do cause injury to our underground water supply; (3) Creates an unreasonable risk of fire in the neighborhood as the occupant will not landscape ...,, n,q., nmhnarahlP fire hazards: (4) Creates a health hazard in that the storage of said vehicles provides a suitable habitat and breeding ground for rodents, reptiles (to include snakes), roaches, spiders, and other nuisance pests; and (5) Diminishes and detracts, and financially damages the neighborhood by lessening or tending to lessen our property values. Further, it creates the appearance of an "automobile junkyard" or "automobile dismantler" in an upper middle income resid en ti.al area. ~~eerAinoly ~JP YPFpYC t.CLLll~ leQUe~t. a. Immediate and appropriate enforcement of existing zoning ordinances. August 11, 1987 Page 3 b. If existing zoning laws are not specific, that said ordinances be revised, and that upon final enactment said owner/occupant of 6006 Klusman Ave „ be informed that his use is non-conforming and that he be Riven sixty (60) days or such ether rea sonablc period of time to bring his property into conformity with the zoning ordinances. c. Por prompt and speedy enforcement of all the existing fire, health, and safety codes of this City, County and State; and, d. For such other relief as may be just and equitable. DATED: August 11, 1987, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. NAME PD-RESS rip ~i~'v'rf 4 ~~ ~ ~a 3 ~ r~'~E4 ¢__~ ,'~ ~ {: r~ti ,, „ - ..~, ~ w,~-t~ 1 a,,~_ 1 tv_' ' ~:... t_ (c-<r~~l ~rd~?~~u~l~~u W~-kci~ ~~~ ~c~ , ~,. August 11, 1987 Page 4 NAME ADDRESS August 11, 1987 T0: The Honorable Mayor, Dennis Stout, and to the Honorable Members of the City Council, Rancho Cucamonga, California. We, the undersigned property owners and electors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and who reside in the area of 6006 Klusman Ave., of this City, respectfully present to you the following facts and petition you for appropriate relief: 1. On or about August 1, 1987, the new owner and/or occupant of the residential premises commonly known as 6006 Klusman Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, caused approximately 20-30 dilapidated, inoperable, and otherwise junk cars, to be placed on said property. 2. Attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference, are several photographs which accurately depict the current appearance of said property. 3. The property owner/occupant has been contacted and asked to remove the vehicles from this residential neigh- borhood to an appropriate and suitable location. Said owner/occupant refuses to remove the vehicles and maintains the vehicles can be legally stored, and that said vehicles are owned and possessed by him for the purpose of restora- tion as his "hobby". 4. The Petitioners are of the firm belief that such storage is: a, Unlawful in that it does not conform to R-1 zoning requirements in accordance with this City's master plan; -1- August 11, 1987 Page 2 b. Unlawful in that said occupant is and in all probability operating an automobile restoration business for profit in an area that is not zoned commercially, c. Unlawful in that the conduct of the owner/ occupant is in violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions (C, C,& R;s) which are recorded in the office of the County Recorder of this County. d. Unlawful in that the conduct herein complained of is: (1) An attractive nuisance which could lure young children onto the property and could subject them to an unreasonable risk of injury; (2) Creates an environmental pollution hazard through illegal and unauthorized discharge of lubricants, fuel, and other hazardous chemicals which can and do cause injury to our underground water supply; (3) Creates an unreasonable risk of fire in ~iie ueigi~boriiood as [he occupant well not landscape or otherwise reduce combustable fire hazards; (4) Creates a health hazard in that Che storage of said vehicles provides a suitable habitat and breeding ground for rodents, reptiles (to include snakes), roaches, spiders, and other nuisance pests; and (5) Diminishes and detracts, and financially damages the neighborhood by Lessening or tending to lessen our propert~. values, Further, Lt creates the appearance of an automobile junkyard" or "automobile dismantler" in an upper middle income residential area. Accordingly, we respectfully request: a. Immediate and appropriate enforcement of existing zoning ordinances. August 11, 1987 Page 3 b. If existing zoning laws are not specific, that said ordinances be revised, and that upon final enactment said owner/occupant of 6006 Klusman Ave., be informed that his use is non-conforming an3 that he be given sixty (60) days or such other reasonable period of time to bring his property into conformity with the zoning ordinances, c. For prompt and speedy enforcement of all the existing fire, health, and safety codes of this City, County and State; and, d, For such other relief as may be ,just and equitable. ~'~ DATED: August 11, 1987, at Rancho Cucamonga, California, f .. ~i c /: ~~ .~ri~" r i t , ii, ~J n. ~i' 0 • .. `LI 'L,r ~ ~ r Vin! i L,L; /il ~ {(l ~/' _ ~i, 7 (/' Y August 11, 1987 Page 4 NAME ADDRESS ,~ August 11, 1987 Page 4 NAME ADDRESS August 11, 1987 T0: The Honorable Mayor, Dennis Stout, and to the Honorable Members of the City Council, Rancho Cucamonga, California, We, the undersigned property owners and electors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and who reside in the area of 6006 Klusman Ave., of this City, respectfully present to you the following facts and petition you for appropriate relief: 1. On or about August 1, 1987, the new owner and/or occupant of the residential premises commonly known as 6006 Kl usnan Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, cause3 approximately 20-30 dilapidated, inoperable, and otherwise junk cars, to be placed on said property. 2. Attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference, are several photographs which accurately depict the current appearance of said property. 3. The property owner/occupant has been contacted and asked to remove the vehicles from this residential neigh- borhood to an appropriate and suitable Location, Said owner/occupant refuses to remove the vehicles and maintains the vehicles can be legally stored, and that said vehicles are owned and possessed by him for the purpose of restora- tion as his "hobby". 4. The Petitioners are of the firm belief that such storage is: a. Unlawful in that it does not conform to R-i zoning requirements in accordance with this City's master plan; -1- August 11, 1987 Page 2 b. Unlawful in that said occupant is and in all probability operating an automobile restoration business for profit in an area that is not zoned commercially. c. Unlawful in that the conduct of the owner/ occupant is in violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions (C, C,& Rls) which are recorded in the office of the County Recorder of this County. d. Unlawful in that the conduct herein complained of is: (1) An attractive nuisance which could lure young children onto the property and could subject them to an unreasonable risk of injury; (2) Creates an environmental pollution hazard through illegal and unauthorized discharge of lubricants, fuel, and other hazardous chemicals which can and do cause injury to our underground water supply; (3) Creates an unreasonable risk of fire in thn n inhhn~h nnrl oa rho nrcunant will not landscape or otherwise reduce combustable fire hazards; (4) Creates a health hazard in that the storage of said veh is ].es provides a suitable habitat and breeding ground for rodents, reptiles (to include snakes), roaches, spiders, and other nuisance pests; and (5) Diminishes and detracts, and financially damages the neighborhood by lessening or tending to lessen our property values. Further, it creates the appearance of an automobile junkyard" or "automobile dismantler" in an upper mrddle income residential area. 5. Accordingly, we respectfully request: a. Immediate and appropriate enforcement of existing zoning ordinances. August 11, 1987 Page 3 b. If existing zoning laws are not specific, that said ordinances be revised, and that upon final enactment said owner/occupant of 6006 Klusman Ave., be informed that his use is non-conforming and that he be given sixty (60) days or such other reasonable period of time to bring his property into conformity with the zoning ordinances. c. For prompt and speedy enforcement of ali the existing fire, health, and safety codes of this City, County and State; and, d. For such other relief as may be just and equitable. DATED: August 11, 1987, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. NAt~ ~~ '- ...~ r_=. iY~ ~-r '';~I,; ~{ ~~`~'t. 'e ~. -~~-~ ,= n ~ i ~,,x. 4 ,. PDURESS ...~/ /, ~ „ _ ri, .~, r lr~ '~',., ~~~ .. . .'.,. i;.,,1 „i. .~.~ . / ./'/ ~%~ y' )v. %= i u6a~ (A ' ~~ 7 7"' ~ , P,1: '/' August 11, 1987 Page 4 NAME ADDRESS Q11o l ~:.>~/ a August 11, 1987 T0: The Honorable Mayor, Dennis Stout, and to the Honorable Members of the City Council, Rancho Cucamonga, California. We, the undersigned property owners and electors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and who reside in the area of 6006 Klusman Ave., of this City, respectfully present to you the following facts and petition you for appropriate relief: 1. Dn or about August 1, 1987, the new owner and/or occupant of the residential premises commonly known as 6006 Klusman Ave „ Rancho Cucamonga, caused approximately 20-30 dilapidated, inoperable, and otherwise junk cars, to be placed on said property. 2. Attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference, are several photographs which accurately depict the current appearance of said property. 3. The property owner/occupant has been contacted and asked to remove the vehicles from Chia residential neigh- borhood to an appropriate and suitable location. Said owner/occupant refuses to remove the vehicles and maintains the vehicles can be legally stored, and that said vehicles are owned and possessed by him for the purpose of restora- tion as his "hobby". 4. The Petitioners are of the firm belief that such storage is: a. Unlawful in that it does not conform to R-1 zoning requir. ements in accordance with this City's master plan; -1- August 11, 1987 Page 2 b. Unlawful in that probability operating an business for profit in a'. commercially. said occupant is and in all automobile restoration area that is not zoned c. Unlawful in that the conduct of the owner/ occupant is in violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions (C, C,& R',s) which are recorded in the office of the County Recorder of this County. d. Unlawful in that the conduct herein complained of is: (1) An attractive nuisance which could lure young children onto the pzoperty and could subject them to an unreasonable risk of injury; (2) Creates an environmental pollution hazard through illegal and unauthorized discharge of lubricants, fuel, and other hazardous chemicals which can and do cause injury to our underground water supply; (3) Creates an unreasonable risk of fire in the nh h..~6....A •1... _ ..iii i._~. or otherwise reduce combustable~fire hazards;yJ~uet (4) Creates a health hazard in that the storage of said vehicles provides a suitable habitat and breeding ground for rodents, reptiles (to include snakes), roaches, spiders, and other nuisance pests; and (5) Diminishes and detracts, and financially damages the neighborhood by lessening or tending to lessen our property values. Further, it creates the appearance of an "automobile junkyard" or "automobile dismantler" in an upper middle income residential area. Accordingly, we respectfully request: a. Ism~ediate and appropriate enfor,:ement of existing zoning ordinances. August 11, 1987 Page 3 b. If existing zoning laws are not specific, that said ordinances be revised, and that upon final enactment said owner/occupant of 6006 Klusman Ave., be informed that his use is non-conforming and that he be given sixty (60) days or such ocher reasonable period of time to bring his property into conformity . with the zoning ordinances. c. For prompt and speedy enforcement of all the existing fire, health, and safety codes of this City, County and State; and, d. For such other relief as may be just and equitable. DATED: August 11, 1987, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. NAME PDDRESS _ r y .., t .i ~ / i ~ ~ ,may" u ` i ~'.~' ~ ~C( ~ i , la, ~ i I fo Tl lip((, ISc 'il (' J, _ i-> ~~l~',11 ~~~ /:,C ~dk,~~ '! ~~,.~~~ 1/~~/K./~~ /-(ill (~Y, l/I Vic .'-~ ___./ ~ -.~ ~' -r' ... ~ ~: c . v: August 11, 1987 Page 4 NAME ADDRESS '--~~ t N i <. / -!~ c .~, ~y~ k E ' ~ ~' %' , .~i ~,..... ~~. :/ i' i _-_~ ~~.~ - 4 _ ~ L- - w.~.. .r r ' / ~, r ~ i August 11, 1987 T0: The Honorable Mayor, Dennis Stout, and to the Honorable Members of the City Council, Rancho Cucamonga, California. We, the undersigned property owners and electors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and who reside in the area of 6006 Klusman Ave., of this City, respectfully present to you the following facts and petition you for appropriate relief: 1. On or about August: 7., 1987, the new owner and/or occupant of the residential premises commonly known as 6006 Klusman Ave., Ranc};o Cucamonga, caused approximately 20-30 dilapidated, inoperable, and otherwise junk cars, to be placed on said property. ~. nctacnee hereto, and incorporated herein by reference, are several photographs which accurately depict t}~e current appearance of said property. 3. The property owner/o;:cups nt has been contacted and asked to remove the vehicl~.;;; frcc~ this residential neigh- borhood to an appropriate ar:3 suitable location. Said uwner/occupant refuses to re;nove the vehicles and maintains the vehicles can be legally stored, and that said vehicles are owned and oussessed by him for the purpose of restora- tion as his "hobby", 4. The Petitioners are of the firm belief that such storage is: a. uniawfui in that it does not conform tc R-1 zoning requirements in accordance with this City's master plan; -1- August 11, 1987 Page 2 b. Unlawful in that probability operating an business for profit in a' commercially, said occupant is and in all automobile restoration .area that is not zoned c. Unlawful in that the conduct of the owner/ occupant is in violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions (C, C,& R', s) which are recorded in the office of the County Recorder of this County. d. Unlawful in that the conduct herein complained of is: (1) An attractive nuisance which could lure young children onto the property and could subject them to an unreasonable risk of injury; (2) Creates an environmental pollution hazard through illegal and unauthorized discharge of lubricants, fuel, and other hazardous chemicals which can and do cause injury to our underground water supply; (3) Creates an unreasonable risk of fire in the neighborhood AR rho nnrnnanr ..,in ..... i~.,a..,..,.... or otherwise reduce combusr_able fire hazards; ....,r.. (4) Creates a health hazard in that the storage of said vehicles provides a suitable habitat and breeding ground for rodents, reptiles (to include snakes), roaches, spiders, and other nuisance pests; and (5) Diminishes and detracts, and financially damages the neighborhood by lessening or tending to lessen our property values, Further, it creates the appearance of an automobile junkyard" or "automobile dismantler" in an upper middle income residential area. Accordingly, we respectfully request: a. Immediate and appropriate enforcement of existing zoning ordinances. August 11, 1987 Page 3 b. If existing zoning laws are not specific, that said ordinances be revised, and that upon final enactment said owner/occupant of 6006 Klusman Ave „ be informed that his use is non-conforming and that he be given sixty (60) days or such other reasonable period of time to bring his property into conformity with the zoning ordinances. c. Por prompt and speedy enforcement of all the existing fire, health, and safety codes of this City, County and State; and, d, For such other relief as may be just and equitable. DATED: August 11, 1987, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. NAME PDDRESS ~ ~~'7 ,rVZ L ~ `~5 ~_ ~ ~ yi--'LOS i- L s~ R~-a Loy-+A _l~~T ('o t~Eu ha,.,~-2 FfLo`1 bFL~a I/is>71 ~~(~ n August 11, 1987 Page 4 NAME ADDRESS ~i~~~