Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/09/16 - Agenda Packet~~ ~~%.~~% r._ (, ~.~A,k ;~;~~. u` )~~~ I/ C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA eon o1RO, eo. m~, n.otro c.t.o,ay., !'.tiani, 91 JJO, I~I.I ee9.1 eJ1 September 11, 1967 Mr. and Mrs. Eric Gunderson 9263 Monte Vista Rancho Cucamonga, California 91101 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gunderson: Re are in receipt of your letter dated September 1, 1981 addressed to the Mayor and City Council requesting to appeal the decision by Russell Maguire to remove the island on your street. Please be advised you are scheduled to be on the September 16, 1987 City Council agenda. A copy of the agenda and the staff report prepared 6y the Engineering Department is enclosed for your information. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office at 969-1851, Extension 204, Sincerely, Beverly A. Au thelet City Clerk By: ~../l 6 , e , - -~ ~ ~ . Debra Adams, Deputy City Clerk BAA/d ja Enr.losed c„~wiT,mxn N+n• DeboM N. Brown Jeetey Kine fin M,.,tn nennisL Smm ChMdl. Buqutt 11 Punelt 1. Wri{hl Duren M.Wnxrmtn ~~ /_ Qeci~ 111c~t~cti ~~,~~- `~ C~~f~V~ .i~ o~+l.{Q7-Q.C-C,. ~}''~A1%Y{A_t/LQ , 1-C~ n~~ Q~Lx.Q, ~'~ VYw~,~y ~'U.49-~,~.t~t-ti"Q cwt g '{'btu-~-" ~~ OGt.o-u-~~, ,..~-e ,_,~' a,~.~- ~, N O °~ ~ ~~~ C°~.~wlcR.c,v,~~ '~ ~12 ~3 (~lL~'~t, ~~1. 1.. S~n"•`.~..~ti ~ I~ ~~l ~ 7 j~c,-rc,~,e ~.u.c~tm,~~- ~a CITY 0 ~ppNCHn UCAMORGA ADMINISTRATION sFP oz tsar C L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA~y/y~ ~ p-""'r "'r MEMORANDUM ~ .~~~~y. DATE: September 1, 1987 T0: Mayor and City Manager ~~//~~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer!%~~~~~~~~ BY: Duane Baker, Admin. Asst. l SUBJECT: Landscaping And Tree Request For The 9200 Black Of Monte Yista On August 6th, the City received a letter from Eric and Judy Gunderson of 9263 Monte Yista. Mr. and Mrs. Gunderson contacted the City to ask if the City could landscape a median island which exists on their street. Staff reviewed this median island with a consultant for the City's Joint Powers Insurance Authority. It was the opinion of the JPA consultant and myself that the current configuration of the median has some very serious problems. These problems are that the medtan island is not very visible at night and is in an unusual configuration, thus causing the potential for traffic problems. The second problem is that the median constricts the width of the travel lane to substandard levels. It is my recommendation, with which the JPA consultant concurs, that the median island be removed entirely. This removal is presently betng scheduled. In a phone conversation with Judy Gunderson. she indlrarad rear ~tio Way concerned with speeding traffic on her street if the median were removed. In response, Tt was noted that the street is a very out of the way residential street and the potential for outside traffic was very low. However, we indicated that a "No Outlet" sign could be posted at the beginning of the neighborhood if outside traffic became a problem. Another issue which Mrs. Gunderson brought up in the phone conversation of August 31, is tree placement in a parkway between two drive approaches. The Gundersons had planted a large tree in the area between a neighbors drive approach and their own. Nhen the neighbors house was sold, the new owners cut the tree down. It is true that the neighbors cut the tree down without permission or a permit. Code enforcement is working on this si tua tf nn. Additionally, these neighbdrs allegedly did not cut the stumo dcwr~ far enough to allow for landscaping re-establishment. Code enforcement is also working on this situation. Mrs. Gunderson would like to replant a tree in the area between the 9200 Block of Monte Vista Page 2 drive approaches. Upon investigation, we have advised her that she would not be aitowed to plant a tree because there is not enough clearance. However, the tree replacement will occur westerly to the two driveways where clearance is sufficient. This is the Tnfomiation we have received so far. The Gundersons have indicated that they may appeal. For your information 1 have attached their original letter of August 6th and the tract map of the neighborhood. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. %la cc: Jack Lam, Comm. Dev. Dir. Attachments G /~ ~C ~iin~P/'so~ /ZF.3 ~~f~ Usf~ Ss. Cc lJeis. qR~ (c /~ g/7o/V /-1[~wst ~ /yrs' /SUSS /p ~A 4Ui2e - ~~iy ~i~/n PP2 /S 2/O ~Pb'EMSf yOUI~ / 4SS/S~4/1 Ce /~ ~n~s~c~/~ !J 2`~P /S~nr/ /iJ ~ijC /77/~~~ ~ ~ BGJ' /.Sf/PPS. /~ /S '{yP P 6 ~ Pn /7G/~c C'n.R~/7Y L~/oL/~g //lc% /out ~.'oir/P q~// of/1P2s / /'j' O~/i+/aq l~/cL/~ ~2 ~i'~~~y ~~~/Pria fPr/ ~'o/' S/G~/ o ~ic~ .~ zf~, , s fi~ r/r 2 , cyrvo u~~ 198I -_~~ ~`J~~ FNGiNfEp qC Oryls~~xc~ lu~~T~.~-rLea n-~ ,.M !}.::ter 1 '~ 0 N ti. li ~,i Y ~ O 4 ~ ._ n .~i N 8 ~ b ~~ ~ ' 0 0 „ q~ ` v~°n _ h T - s ~~ r^ [ C p _ N~ ^,4 ,~. a, , ~ :c --l o. ao.`rt` i ' ~_ rr w „o l" 8 $~ : R } ~ 2 ~ I ~, i. m _ : / Ate h ~ ~ \ _~MJ3AI-~-. _+ ~ ~_ --- 04GU ritli ~ ~ ..__ _ /~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~:. 1I, ~' t }`>. y~_. Z ^ ' ~ ~ Z ^ ~ ~~ 'b ` - rl /~ O ie Y Z ~- p~ e QMl C O C qq~~O N6~ 'o C~tQi 0 v a m E n n m Y ~¢ `~ .. .. .- .. .~ ... -. .. r ,may ~~ r ~.. Q C,~ Clf`.' OL H.tVCHO CUCAMON ,n L~JJ ~/ August 26, 1987 Eric Gunderson 9263 Monte Vista St. Ra.rcha .. ~„aaonga, CA gii0i Dear Mr. Gunderson: ~~.,,rv'.. a , F~' F.m.'. ~ ..~..:ue. CnYrnna YI~?0. OU1989.1851 In response M your letter of August tith, the Engi o=eying Division has reviewed the island on your street, The 'and sc.~ni ng of the island on your street must compete with other projects in the City for limited funds. The funds that the City does have available for this type of project are used in areas where there is a wider and mare general benefit. There are no funds available for a project of this type in a residential neighborhood. W'aile rev-; ewln9 this situation, Engi re=ring staff recognized a problem with the island on your street. The street in its current configuration has some pore oci al problems. Now that the City has Seen made ?ware of th?se pr~>Sl ems, ;t is obligated to act. The island orl sour street has been referred to the Maintenance Section for removal. The island has Seen placed on the maintenanro crhamllo sue. remuvai wl vt vt Ule next tew months. Shauld you nave any questions regarding this matt?r, please call me or Duane Dak?r at g89-1862. Since ~+i +. COMMUNITY Of-'/ELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGI NEED?i NG 91VLi ION _ // .~ i'/ / ~ty Er 1~N?r ~' P,NI4/1.a PAGE Aedevel opment Agency Agenda Septembez 16, 1987 1 A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Brarn Buquet _, Stout Ring _,•and Nrighi H. CONSENT CALHNDAR 2. Approval of City/Agency/County mmorandw of undezetaadiag regarding the relocation and development of the Cmwty pre-trial detention facility. l:. YUCLlI: tteANl NuJ The follaring Consent Calendar items are ezpected to be routine end non-controversial. They rill be acted upo¢ by the RDA at one time rithout discussion. Any item may be removed bg an Ageacymember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval for the Chairman to ezecute a contreci (CO RA 87-020) rith GRC, Inc. to act ee Acquisition Agent in the acquisieion of ei tee For fire protection facil itiee. NONE SUBMITTED. The Rancho Cacamonga Redevelopment Agency Meeting rill zeceu to recomame at the tine of considaratiom of the City Mamager~^ Suff Reports by the City Co®cil. D. STAFF REPORTS j i ~'il I~ jl 1_L 1. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BY AND HETNEEN THE CITY OF P.9NCE0 CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDHYELOPMENf AGENCY - eetebl iehing sources of funds to be paid for the 6evei opmenc of the Fubi is Safety and Civic Facility. 10 15 ~:,~' " 1 '~, ~ ;J' tSi Redevelopaent Agency Agenda September 16, 1987 PAGE E. COZMUNICATIONS FROM TIB PUBLIC This ie the rise and place for the general public to address the Redevel opaeat Agency. State lmr prohibits the Agency from addreoeing ary issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency mey receive testimony end set the matter for a eubeequent meeting. Comments are to be lisited to five sinu[ea per individual. i P. ADJOURNMENT I II i I i V ~ I ~ I I I . I r~f:.A~, i x r~, ri ~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP Deputy Executive Director Olen ,zones, Redevelopment Analyst . Authorization for the Chairman to execute a contract with GRC, Inc to act as Acquisition Agent for the acquisition of sites for fire protection facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with GRC, Inc to act as Acquisition Agent for the acquisition of sites for fire protection facilities. BACKGROUND: In Apcil, 1987, the Agency approved a Master Plan for the development of Fire Protection Facilities, which outlined the needed facilities and set a schedule for the acquisition and construction of those facilities. Recognizing that the land prices would continue to escalate, the Agency set as a priority the acquisition of the land necessary for all the facilities. Agency Counsel, Best, Best & Krieger, was handling the transa rtions for the Agency. ANALYSIS: With the resignation of Best, Best & Krieger, the Agency is '-;, r,1-^ -^^^^a „mot:' the :~i••n~ in nrAnr hn rnnYinuo the acquisition process and ensure ,that the Agency is able to obtain commitments for the needed sites, it is necessary to obtain the services of an Acquisition Agent. This agent will negotiate with the land owners on behalf of the Agency, open the escrows, obtain all necessary title reports and appraisals, and perform other related duties as required. GRC, Inc has agreed to provide these services at a cost not to exceed $4,500.00 for all three sites. GRC, Inc is the firm which assisted the Agency with the preparation of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1. Although a different division of the firm will be providing these services, staff is confident that these will be handled in the same professional manner as the Plan Amendment. The firm is experienced as acquisition agent to other redevelopment agencies. , Re p/ec u ly Submitted, ~' z ack Lam, AICP a ' Deputy Executive Director ,I [~ ~1- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1987, between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, a body corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as "Agency"), and GRC, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). A. ReCitd lS (1) Agency has need of professional services with respect to the acquisition of land for the construction of three (3) fire protection facilities. (2) Consultant has submitted a proposal Eor the performance of such services. (3) Agency desires to retain Consultant to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to Agency, Agency board, and staff in the acquisition of the property. (4) Consultant represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEReeoRE, it is agreed by and between Agency and Consultant as follows: nh 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Pro~eect: The acquisition of properties described in Exhrtiit "A" attached hereto, including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and written, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to Agency as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by Agency with respect to the Project. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by Consultant in order to complete the Project. ~~~ (c) Com letion of Pro 'ect: The date of completion of all p ~asea o the Project, including any and all procedures, maps, surveys, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations, and attendance by Consultant at public hearings regarding the acquisition of the land identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. Consultant agrees as follows: (a) Consultant shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto, and all in accordance with Federal, State, and City statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of the Agency. (b) Consultant shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" to Agency within the time specified in Exhibit "A". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A". Agency may thereafter review and forward to Consultant comments regarding said documents and Consultant shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. Agency shall receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by the Agency. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section _ .l ._. F_ GL.~U~ 111>Y Uc cnL2iiucd 'u'w.i er.~.. u. aprr ... Agency. (c) Consultant shall, at Consultant's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of Consultant, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event ~ that any such other persons are retained by Consultant, Consultant hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform such services required hereunder. Consultant further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by Consultant except upon the prior written approval of the Agency. -- 3 Agency agrees as follows: (a) To pay Consultant a maximum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4,500.00) for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct or indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to Consultant. Payment to Consultant shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth below. (b) Payments to Consultant shall be made by Agency in accordance with the invoices submitted 6y Consultant, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable amount of time after said invoices are received by Agency. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed Four Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars ($4.275.00). (c) Consultant agrees that, in no event, shall Agency be required to pay to Consultant any sum in excess of Four Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars ($4,275.00) prior to receipt by Agency of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein, in acceptable form and content to Agency. Final payment shall be made not later than Sixty (60) days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by Agency. services requested in writing by Agency, and not included in Exhibit "B" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "B". CHarges Eor additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by Agency within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by Agency. Agency agrees to provide Consultant: (a) lnformation and assistance as necessary. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and ocher information, iE availahle, which Consulta~it considers necessary in order to complete the Project. (c) Such information as is generally available from Agency files applicahle to the Project. ~µ . (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be Consultant's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. Ownership of documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of the Agency and, upon payment for services performed by Consultant, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to Agency by Consultant. Consultant may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as Consultant may desire. ~. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by Agency upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to~COnsultant at least Fifteen (15) days prioc to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, Consultant shall be compensated at Consultant's applicable hourly rates, as set forth in Exhibit "B", on a pro rata basis with respect to the percentage of the Project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall Consultant receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a), above. Consultant shall provide to Agency any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports, whether in uaal't CLioi i~uu, l,~c~a~cu uy Cwuulim,L date of termination. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below-named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Olen Jones Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency P.O. Box 8U7 Ra.^.c.^.o Cucamonga, rn u173U Steve Copenhaver GRC, Inc 150 W. First St, Suite 280 Claremont, CA 91711-4139 -5- S. Insurance: Consultant shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to Agency nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. Consultant shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Workers' Com ensation Insurance: Before beginning work, Consultant shal urnrsh to Agency a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance wi tl: the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Consultant shall, prior to commencing work, sign and file with Agency a certification as follcws: "I am aware of the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700 which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance ui ~i,io iay~ccwcut.° (h) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at Consultant's sole cost ans expense, Consultant shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of the Agency and COnsultant, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from Consultant's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,QUU.Ub) for property damage. ~~ (c) General Insurance Re uirements: All insurance require y express provrsion of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against Agency and Agency's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2j~the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried 6y Agency; and (3) they may not be canceled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days notice by insurer to Agency by certified mail. Consultant shall furnish Agency with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing insurance. Consultant may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and save harmless Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by Consultant of any and all legal costs and attorney's fees, in any manner arising out of or incidental to the performance by Consultant of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum eelcut k,e uuittc4 'uy aow. 10. Assiq omen[: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either whole or in part, by Consultant without the prior written consent of Agency. 1 11. Damages: In the event that Consultant fails to submit to Agency the completed project, together with all documents and supplemental material required hereunder, in public hearing form, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Agency, within the time set forth herein, or as may be extended by written consent of the parties hereto, Consultant shall pay to the Agency as liquidated damages an amount equal to any and all amounts paid by Agency to Consultant under the terms of this Agreement, which sum represents a reasonable endeavor by the parties hereto to estimate a fair compensation for the foreseeable losses that might result from such a default in performance by Consultant, and due to the dif Eiculty which would otherwise occur in establishing actual damages resulting from such default, unless said default is caused by Agency, or by acts op God, acts of the public enemy, fire, flood, epidemic, or quarantine restrictions. 12. Indecendent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that Consultant and its employees, officers, and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed Eor any purpose to be employees of the Agency. 13. Govern~in Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and co- nstrued in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 14. Attornevs' Bees: In the event any legal proceeding is inSCirUCBU W euiutue ouy Le uu u. yi G. iniJr. r Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and court costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the COUrt to be reasonable. 15. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral of written, between the parties with respect to khe subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing, signed by all parties. V- IN WITNESS WNEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year set forth shove: CONSULTANT AGENCY Chairman ATTEST: City Clerk - ~.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY S!'AFF REPORT GATE: September 16, 1987 TO: Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, A[CP, Deputy Director SUBJECT: CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING COUNTY PRE-TR AL DET NT ION FACILITY The Memorandum of Understanding (MDU) attached to this staff report represents all the points of discussion between the City, Agency, and County regarding the relocation of the County pre-trial detention center from the Law and Justice Center site to one at the southeast corner of the City. This Memorandum of Understanding memorializes the points of understanding between the City, County and the Agency, and is consistent with City/Rgency policy direction. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Memorandum of Understanding. Deputy Oirec tar JL/jr Attachment J~/ MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REGIONAL PRE-TRIAL DETEN9'ION FACILITY PUBLIC 1MPNOVEMENTS BETW EEN 7`HE COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR-IINO,THERANCHO CUCAMONGA REUEVELOPMENT AGF;NCY, AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ARTICLE 1 PARTIES AND HATES This Agreement entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this day of September 1987, between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"1, and the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body 1"Agency"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City"). Alt'1'ICI.E II KP:CI'I'ALS Section 'l.l Agency is presently undertaking a program under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et sea•)* for tho redevelopment, replanning and redesign of certain noncontiguous and blighted areas within the City with stagnant, improperly utilized and unproductive land known as the Ranchu Redevelopment Project ("Project")and requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Ordinance No. 166 adopted by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, Califurn ia, on December 23, 1981, as amended, which authorizes the redevelopmentof an area within the tern Wrial limits of the City by the Agency. -11- *All sub .quent references, unless otherwise noted, are to the California liealth and Safety Cede. Section 2.2 County, Agency, and City have previously entered into an agreement on February 21, 1982, entitled "Agreement Regarding Rancho Redevelopment Project Area (Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency)", and certain amendments thereto (the "Agreement"), pursuant to Sections 33401 and 33445. The purpose of the Agreement is to assist in the financing of certain regional facilities which Agency and City have found to be of primary benefit to the Project and for which there is no other reasonable means of financing. Section ~.3 County, Agency, and City pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Agreement, as amended, wish to provide for certain reimbursements to County in order to facilitate redevelopment within City and to further provide for the cooperation of County and Agency in carrying out redevelopment activities 6y financing the construction of certain public improvements appurtenant to and of benefit to County's pre-trial detention facility W be located in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Fourth Street. Section 2.4 Agency has found and determined that it would be appropriate to pay money Ur the County which shall be used for the construction of public improvements which are regional facilities and of primary benefit to the Project and 6y otherwise assisting in the financingof County's pre-trial detention facility. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE 111 AGRNCY I{BiM1iUHSEMENTOF000'N`I'Y Section 9.1 Pursuant to Section 4.1 of this Agreement, and this Memorandum of Understanding, Agency shall provide sufficient Funds to reimburse County to enable County W construct and install uffsite water, waste-water, gas, telephone, electrical ,and cable'1'~' improvements necessary W operate and maintain County's pre-trial detention facility, provided such reimbursement shall not exceed $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars). _~2_ County shall submit invoices to Agency for expenditures subject to reimbursement and Agency shall reimburse County for such expenditures within sixty (60) days thereafter. Section 3.2 City shall Gave Lhe right to exercise preliminary site development review of the pre-trial detention facility as such review relates to and concerns the integration of public improvements so as to insure public safety and access. City's Planning Commission shall also have the right to informally review County's site development master plan and building designs for such facility in a manner consistent with such body's review of County's law and justice center. County shall cooperate with and assist in such review process. AN'1'ICL6 1 V 'I`Is KM This Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective upon execution by all parties. All rights and obligations under the Cerms and conditions of this Memorandum of Understanding shall terminate in the event the Agency's right to claim end receive tax increment pursuant Co Section 33670(6) ceases. -13 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date AT'f E S'f: dy lerk RANCHOCUCAMONGA REUEVEI,OPMENT AGENCY Date airman A'1"f EST: APPROVEUASTOFORM: +-_- ecretary au o 0 Deputy C mtV Counsel ~ _ Uate COUNTY OF SAN RERNARUINO airman Board of Supervisors A9"f N: ST: er " ~.4'" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOC REDEVELOPMENT AGENC' STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Deputy Director SUD JECT: CITY/AGENCY AGREEMENT REGARDING SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR PUBLI S FETY RND CIVIC F ILITY The attached Agreement between the City and Redevelopment Rgency formalizes the financing arrangements between the City and Redevelopment Agency for the construction of the Public Safety and Civic facility. The provisions of the Agreement are consistent with the planned financing program conceptually established upon the Redevelopment Agency's sale o' Tax Allocation Bonds in 1986. The arrangements can be summarized as follows: 1. The City becomes responsible for the following: A. The Public Safety building and secured parking structure 8. Onsi to and Offsite improvements L. YrUJeCC CU ^4111ge1161 e! 1'e iabeu bu bile auu rc 2. The RDA becomes responsible for the following: A. The Civic Center building and meeting chambers 6. Furnishings, fixtures and equipment related to the facility C. Project contingencies related to the above 3. Financing will be as follows: (See attached financing program) A. Redevelopment Aycncy coot ri bu ticns tc come from the proceeds of the 1986 Tax Allocation Bonds GUG ~~ a LL Q F U ~~ Redevelopment Agency Staff Report Subject: Sources of Funding September 18, 1987 Page 2 B. City's obligations to come from a "down payment" from a portion of the Civic Center fund and remainder from an interest free loan from the Redevelopment Agency. C. Please note that all furnishings, fixtures, and equipment will be paid for entirely through the earned interest on the 1986 Tax Allocation bonds. 4. City will allow the Redevelopment Agency to utilize the facilities at no cost upon completion of the project. As originally conceived, the financing program enabled the City's annual financial obligations to not exceed the total annual cost which the City would pay for its rental space at the time of project completion. Because the bids have been so favorable, the City's annual obligation RECDMMENDATIDN: Approve the City/Agency Agreement and Finance Plan. Respectfully omitted, ~--~-'-Lam, RI ~IP'~---^^'~""""'_ Deputy Director JL/jr Attachment -1~- CIVIC CENTER/PUBLIC SRFETY PROJECT FINANCING PROGRAM A. C[TY PORTION OF CIVIC CENTER/PUBLIC SRFETY PROJECT: NOTE: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NO INTEREST LOAN TO THE CITY PAYMENTS TO BEGIN UPON OCCUPANCY PUBLIC SAFETY b PARKING STRUCTURE .6 5,000,000 ONSITES/OFFSITES E 1,100,000 PROJECT CONTINGENCIES (10% AND WORK NOT PRESENTLY INCLUDED ON BiGS) S 690,000 SUBTOTAL ; 6,790,000 MINUS DOWNPAYMENT CIVIC CENTER FACILITY FUND S 2,500,000 SUBTOTAL f 4,290,000 ANNUAL PAYMENT/20 YR. NO INTEREST L00.N PAYMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: E 214,500 B RGA runTi Oii GF CiiiC CG\ILI\%f VU Lie 'InI .TY ~ACIL ITY: CIVIC CENTER BUILDING b11 ,800,000 FURN[SHINGS* 5 1,529,432 PROJECT CONTINGENCIES (10% AND WORK NOT PRESENTLY INCLUDED ON BIDS) E 1,552,943 SUBTOTAL b14 ,882 ,375 *R11 furnishings casts to be paid through interest earned on 1986 lax Rllocation Bond Issue. -11' City Council Agenda PAGE Septmher 16, 1987 1 All itma submitted foz the City Comcil Agenda moat be in rritiag. The deadline for submitting these itms is 5:00 p. m. on the Wednesday prior to the seating. The City Q ark's Office receives all such itme. CALL TO DRDRA 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Roll Call: Brorm Baguet Stout _ King _,~and Wright B. ANNOUNC&ffiNTS/PASSBNTATIONS 1. Presentation of Proclmation declaring Septmber 17, 1987 ae U. S. Conetifution Day in Rancho Cucamonga and encouraging ell residents to participate in activities cmmamoratiag the 200th Aanivereery of the U. S. Constitution. 2. Presentation of a Proclamation proclaiming October 4 - 10 es Pi re Prevention Week, The follor ing Consent Cal ender itms are expected to be routine and non-contrweraiel. They rill be acted upon by the Council et oae time without discussion. Any itm may be removed by a Coimcilmember or mmbaz of the audience for discusei on. 1. Approval of Minutes: duly 1, 1987 end Auguei 5, 1987 2. Approval of Warrants, Register No's, 9/2/87 and 9/9/87 and Payroll ending 8/20/87 for the total amount of $1,684,325,24. ii ~ ', i 3. Alcoholic Bwerage Application for On Sale Beer S Nine I ~ ~ ~ .a rl ng P1 ace, ~i:x Star, In c., Pui ~ `lcng Llu, 963"0 i, ~ I ~ Besel ins Roed. I I II ~ 4. Alcohol is Beverage Appl ice ti on for Off Sele General, '. Arrw 6 Gcwe Lia uor 6 Market, B1 iea B., Richard C., ', ~, ~, it Msry S Norman B. Cerniello, 8114 Arrw lmy. I I~i~~j '~,J..~ L..~-.-- 9 11 _ ~ ~'; ~ -~~,'. '.c PAGE City Couneil Agenda September 16, 1987 2 I ,_;-I .1 i 5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sele Beer 6 Wine 13 Eating place, Sabe'a Deli, Sam Seba, 9000 Pootbill Blvd., Ste. 112. 6. Approval to declare as aurpl ue property end authorize 15 the Bale of three (3) Weag worketatione. 7. Approval of Piacal Year 1986-87 Approoriationa. 16 8. Approval of Resolution Ordering preparation of 17 Reapportionment Report for Tract 13118 Within Assessment District Bfi-2 (Dwight French). RESOLUTION NO. 87-490 18 A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONCA, CAL IPORNIA, ORDHRING THE PRHPARATION OP A REA~PCIRTIONNBHT RHPORT AND AMENDED ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSESSMBNT DISTRI Cp AND HSTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMENT FEES FOR TRACE 13118 WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-2 (DWIGHT FRENCH) 9. Approval of a Reaol ution to call in all Liens, Bonds, Zll find/or Dwel opment Agreements for the Funding of Haven A_.. n_._._u.. wn dom..... _D4...... __ Awl _ _ ___ •r n.-..... •. •--... ... . Also to establish policy pertaining to the requiring of future development to reimburse for median conetructi on by adding a reimbursement cl ease to the Conditions of Approval for undwel aped properties fronting Haven Avenue. RESOLUTION N0. 87-491 22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CAL IPORNIA, PERTAINING TO FUNDING FOA TH8 HAVEN AVHNUH MEDIAN PHASP. II CONSTRUCIION 10. Apprw al of loco Lion of a pr ev iouely authorized adult I 23 Cr osain¢ Guard fnr Rt ork School at tha iateraectic^. of Orchard Street and Sapphire Street. 11. Approval of adult Crossing Guard for Victoria Park Lene 24 at the intersection of Vict orie Perk Lane end North Victoria Nindrws Loop (Windrows School). C1~', '%. 'r< I i I i I i ~~__L 1. Ciiy Council Agenda September 16, 1987 12. Approval to award the hid to Pitasei-Dalmau Architects of Rancho Cueeaoaga for the design of the City Corporation Yard et 9153 9th Street and preparation of plane and contract docunente for the amount of $107,645.00 plus a ten percent cantingeneq far a total of $118,410.00. 13. Approval of a Resolution of Intent to consider a median break on Nwen Avenue between Trademark end Sizth Street that would allow for the dwel opment of a master planned project that would far ezceed the design standards of the Hwen Avenne Overlay District. RESOLUTION N0. 87-492 A RESW.UTION OP TNB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCFIO CUCAIgNGA, CALIFORNIA, STATING ITS INTENT TO CONSIDER A MEDIAN BREAK ON HAVEN A9ENUE BEIWEBN TRADEMARK AND 3IRTH STREET 14. Approval to execute Contract CLenge Order No. 2 (CO 86-114) with Liwill e, Incorporated, for sidewalk, drive approach and curb return rw iaione to the Baee Line Nidening plane in an amount of $1,880.00. 15. Approval of Improvement Agreement $teneion for '!'tact Hermosa Avenue, submitted yby «VThomeeu E.~ Tucker end William E. Getty in collectively. RESOLUTION N0. 87-493 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAIWNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMBNT ERTENSION AGREE!ffiNT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACE 9649 16. Approval to execute contract (CO 67-139) for the Haven Avenue Median Beeut ifica Lion, Phase I Improvement Project from Arzoa Rouie to 79th Street awarded to Valley Cresi Landscape, Incorporated for the amoune of SI,11 i,'v i4,i8 rn ha 6!nded Erse Eeactif ica^_zcr. Puadn. 17. Approval to execute contract (CO 87-140) for the Traffic Signal et Haven Avenue end 4th Street Improvement P[oj act awarded to Sierra Perif is Electrical Contracting foz the amount of $117 ,5.x.00 to be fundad from TDA fun de. PAGE 3 25 27 41 43 45 46 48 49 ~_ =4~+ /' , ri, .,~ ,r -' ~t~~ je~~ City Council Agenda PAGE e m A~ 3 September 16, 1987 4 i _ - 18. Approval to accept improvenente, Ael ease of Sonde Md Notice of Completion for: Tract 13066 - located on the south aide of 19th Street 50 anal of Amethyst Street. ~ I Releaeel Faithful Performaaca Bond (Street) $306,000 ~ Accept: Maintenance Guaranies Bond (Street) $ 30,600 RESOLUTION N0. 87-494 52 A RESOLUTION OP THE CZTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH8 PUBLIC IMPROVHMENTS FOR TRACT 13066 AND AUTHORIZING T71E PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THH WORK CUP 84-09 - located on the seer aide of Etiwaada Aveaue 53 ~ nor [h of Victoria Avenue. ' Release: I i Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $69,000 ~ i i RESOLUTION N0. 87-445 55 ~ I I I i I A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY OF RANCHO QICAIKINGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THH PUBLIC IFIPROVEMBNTS i POR CUP 84-09 AND AUTNORIZ ING THA PILING OP A NOTICH OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORK ~~ i 19. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement 56 Security far Tract 10414, located south of Carrari Street and rest of Haven Avenue, submit tad by Greg I ! Lundeen, I i i i, l ~I l l. i PWSC UTICN HC. a>_4o6 ~, 6j j ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OP TAE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY • OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, ~ I IFIPROVHHENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVFJO:NT SECURITY, I ~~ ~ I ~ AND PINAL MAP OP TRACE N0. 10414 i i ..~ I . ~ ~. I ~ L' -- - -- t ~~.a ,. r,.; ~St ~ City Couacil Agenda September 16, 1967 20. Approval to m.azd and ezecute the Profeeeioml Services Agreenmt (CO 87-141) for the construction eurveyiag aad staking for the Hwen Avenm Mediene, Phme I Imprwemeat Yroj act specifically from Arrw Route to 19th Street awarded to Hackett and Rrenz er Surveying, Incorporated for the mount of $21,966.00 to be forded from Seeutificetiea Pssnds. 21. Approval to ezecsste coatreci (CO 87-142) for the Archibald Avenue Real igmeat Improvement Project from 19th Street to Highl and Avenue with Highland Avenm Improvements ararded io Laird Construction Cwpalry, Incorpozated, for the mount of $294,442.21 to be funded from Systems Development Fuade. 22. Apprwnl of Nnp, Lprwaent Agremeote and Imprweaent Securities for Trsct i3542-1, located east of Cheffey College, batrem Wilson Avenve and Savyaa Street, submitted by Grigsby Devel opmeni, Incorporated. R850LUTION N0. 87-497 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY CODNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING It0?ItGVEMeNT AG REENENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND FINAL NAP OP TRACE N0. IJJYL-• 23. Approval of a Resolution confizming a City Council decision on September 2, 1987 denying an appeal of e Planning Comniesion condition requiring undezgrounding of utilities el ong 6th Stzeet fot DR 87-20. RESOLUTION N0. 87-498 A hESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL oP THE CITY OF RANCHO QICAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR DEV®.OPNENT REVIEW NO. 87-20, FOR DEVELOPMHNT OF TNRBS (3) MULTITENANT AND ONE WAREHWSE BUILDING TOTAL IIa: 66,374 SQUARE FRET IN THE GENERAL INIRJSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5 3.8 ACRES OF Lld7^ LCCATSD AT THS NORTEEAST CORNER OP TURNER AVENUE AND 6TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS AND SUPPORT THEREOF I, I u PAGE 59 60 61 62 64 75 ~.~L:'y~y.. ~~ ~">X°~ ~ v, PAGE City Cowcil Agenda September 16, 1987 6 I ~~':1 24. Approval of a Resolution authorizing perticipaiioa in the Weet Valley Solid Weete Coalition, RESOLUTION N0. 87-499 78 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OP RAN4I0 WCANDNGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTNORIZINO PAATICI PATION IN THE WEST VALLHY SOLID WASTE COALITION 25. Approval of a Resolution rescinding Resolution No. H7-327 relating to salary rengee and benefits for all full time and pert time empl oyeee. RESOLUTION N0. 87-327A 79 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RB901UTION N0. 87-327 AND ADJUSTING SALARY RANGES AND HBNEFITS POR EMPLOYEES OF TH6 QTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA 26. Approval to designate City Historic Landmark 91 Designation to be placed on the Goerl itz House located et 6156 Hellman Avenue, Ranefio Cucamonga, CA 91701 (~, ease.,. a .e..~. ..... ...~.. .. ~. mow. RESOLUTION N0. 87-500 93 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOGNIZING THE COERL ITZ HOUSE AS A SIGNIPI CART HISTORIC PRATVRE OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. 27. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 95 Secar ity For OR 86-21, located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Jereey Bovl evard, submit [ed by Hillaood Development Company. ~ RESOLUTION NO. 87-501 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COllNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CfICAMDNGA, CALIFORNiA, APPROVING IMPROVEHENT AGREEt~NT AND IMPROVEM~.,7T SECURITY POR DEVELOPMENT RLF IEW N0. 86-21 t ` _+r~~ )C'', PAGE City Council Agenda September 16, 1987 7 'I '. i i L -~_. 26. Approval to ezecute Agreement (CO 87-1 A3) for 99 Installation of Public Imprweaent and Dedication betreen Hunice P. 9weaeon and the City of Rancho Cncamonga for Street Proniage 7nprovemente et 9760 Arrow Route. RESOLUTION N0. 87-502 112 A RHSOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OP TRS QTY OP RANCRO COCAMJNGA, GLIFORNIA, ACCePTING AN PGR88NHNT FOR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC INPRWBI~NT AND DEDI GTION FRON SUNI CR P. SNANSON AND ADTHORIZING THE NAYOR AND CITY GLHRK TO SIGN SA!ffi 29. Apprwel of City/Agency/County memoreadnm of 113 underatending regarding the relocation end devalopmant of the County prririal detention Facility. 30. get public hearing for October 7, 1987 - Off-site 118 Subdivision Directioml Signs. 31. Set public bearing for October 21, 1987 for the 120 adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to Condemn a portion of certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located at 9611 Nilleide Road for [he purpose or constructing ii iiiniuc nosu t~tw, .e.e..•..~ -~ Archibald Avenue. 32. Set public hearing for October 7, 1987 - Emironmentel 12Q Mseaement an3 Development District Amendment 87-09 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - M amendment to change the Development Dietrici designations from the esieting designe[iona to Foothill Boulevard Specific P1 en (P, S. P.) for all properties adjacent to Foothill Boul ward from Gzwe Avenue to the Deer Creek Channel and from the I-13 Freeway to Eaet Avenue within the Poothill Boul award Specific Plnn area. ~~~ ~?'. .} City Council Agenda September 16, 1987 D. CONSHNT ORDINANCHS The following Ordlnences have time of first rending. Secoad routine end noo-contrweraial. the Council at one time without will read the title. Ary discussion. NONE SUBlfITTSD. had public 6earinge ei the rendiage are eapected to be lfiey will he acted upon by discussion. The City Clerk item can be rowed for H. ADYHRTI SBD PDBLIC SHAKINGS j I I~ The foilwiag itsa have bean advertised sad/or posted ac pu611c hearings ne ragnized by law. The Chair will opea the meeting to receive puDl is testimony. SNVIRONMHNTAL ASSBSSMBNT AND THNTATIPH TRACT 13476 - NILLIANS PROPBRTY CONSOLTARCS - Appeal of the Pl enning Commission's decision requiring the pzaaervation of existing Magnolia tree, the wdergrovadiag of existing ... .. . uvaruaau uuu uns, auu we cuun~r uu uuu u• arum, floor el evatione along Hellman Avenue one foot above the 100 year flood Tavel for a residen[iel tract eubdivieion of 37 single family lore on 9.7 acres of lend in the Lw Density Residential District (2-4 dgell ing unite per acre), located ei the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - APN 208-111-04. (Item continued from Sept amber 2, 1987 meeting.) PAGE 125 ~ r 1 City Comcil Agenda September 16, 1987 PAGE I 2. ENVIRONMHNTAL IMPACT RHPORT FOR TIIH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 170 SPECIFIC PLAN AND GBNBRAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 87-038 - To rev iev and consider a recommendation for certification of the Draft Ewironmental Impact Report for the Foothill Specific Plm and General Plm Amendment 87-038 Proj aci. ^_he Specific Plan consists of detailed lend use regulations and standards for the Bevel opnent along Pootbill Soul ward bebem Grwe Avenue and Haven Avenue, hetreen the I-15 Pzeesey and East Avenue. (I tea continued from September 2, 1987 meeting.) ABSOLUTION NO. 87-503 227 A RESOLUTION OP TYIS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF HAN(]10 CUCANDNGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ffi7PIRONlBNTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR 1H8 FOOTHII.L BOULEVARD SPECI PIC PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDf03NT N0. 67-03B, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT HERHOP I 3. BNPIRON!ffiNTAL ASSESBlBNT AND GBNERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 230 i 87-03B -CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to wend the Land Uea Nap of the General Plan to reflect land use chmgee proposed by the Foothill Boul ward Specific ~ P1 an. (item concmuea cram aeprnmoer 2, i9oi mnnriug.) RESOLllTION N0. 67-504 240 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CAL IPORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN ANHtiDMEtiT N0. 87-03B, AN AI~NOMHNT TO THB LAND USE ELEMENT OP THE '; GENERAL PLAN OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CU CAMONGA i WITH R&gPECT TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY MORE SPECI FI GLLY DES CRIBHD HEREN 4. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIPIC PLAN: The purpose of this 246 ' I I item is to consider, review and approve a epecif is plm ~; i I , for The Foothill Houl ward area of Rancfio Cucamonga. I ~; i ~ ~ ~ the Specific 73 an consists of detailed lacd use j t i regal atione sad standards for the Bevel opneni of properties along Foothill Boul ward between Grwe end f t Haven Avenvee, end between I-15 Freeway and Feet ' Avenue. I ~ ~.~ I I .~ I _ };_~:; ~, ,~{,, PAGE City Council Agenda September 16, 1987 10 i ~~~i ~ !.1 RESOLUTION NO. 87-505 263 A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COllNCiL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAIDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THH P001EII.L SODLEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN ENV_TROM4HNTAL ASSHSSMHNT AND HTIWANDA SPHCIFIC PLAN 266 ANR'lIDMHNT H7-02 - CITY OP RANCHO COCANONGA - M amendment to r®we fras the Stiwmda Specific Ylm approximately 57 scree of lend on the north aide of Foothill 86nl N8id between the I-IS Preepey end Eaet Avenue; appso:imntely 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Etirmda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and epptozimately 14 acres of Smd on the southreet corner of Eaet Avenue and Foothill Boul evnrd - APN 227-211-24„ 25 and 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 and 22-27, APN 227-231-19, 21, 28. 29. 33 and 34, APN 229-311-14 and 15, AYN 229-041-01, and poziione of APN 227-231-1fi and 23. (Item continued from September 2, 3987 meeting.) ORDINANCE N0. 320 (first reading) 274 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 QTY OP RANCHO CUCAMINGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING %TSIiANDA SPHCI PIC ft.AN (E. S. P.) AlBND!ffiNT oi-0~ nny anal ~ri.+ iifiiu un inn ii.initt niuc ut POOTHII.L BOULEVARD HE1S168N THS I-13 PRHHNAY AND EAST AVENUE, THE SOUTReAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND BTIWANDA AVENE, AND THE SOUTNNEST CORNER OP FOOTHILL HWLBVARD AND HAST AVENUE BE DELETP.D PROM THE S.S.P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMHNT AND INDUSTRIAL SPHCIPIC PLAN 277 AMENDMHNT 87-01 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - M amendment to temwe from the Industrial Specific Plen approximately 80 acres of land on the south aide of Foothill Boulevard between the 1-13 Freeway and Btiaenda Avenue - APN 229-031-01, lfi and 20 and portions of 229-071-57 and 59. (Item continued from September 2, 1987 meeting,) I - - L--- i ~~; .,.~:~~ r r- PAGE P, ~ ~ ~ City Council Agenda ' a,Pm y .y:°d j September 16, 1987 11 ORDINANCE N0. 321 (first reading) 283 AN ORDINANCE OP TRH CITY COONCIL OF TIIH QTY OF RANCHO GOCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AASA SPECIFIC PLAN (I. S. P.) AI~NO!ffiNT 87-01 RHgU68TING LAND ON TH8 SOUTH SIDE OP POOTHIf.L BOULHVARD BETdBffii TNH I-15 PRHHViAY AND HTINANDA AVffi7UH BB DRLHTED FAOM TNH I.S.P. 7. COMNONITY DSVBLOPMHNT BLOCK GRANT 1986-87 GRANTEE 286 PERFORMANCE RHPORT - Rev iev of Block Grmt Progrm Performance during fiscal year 1986-87 and approval of the Grmtee Performmce Report for submission to Lbe U. S. Depart•ent of Nousing and Urban Development by August 31, 1987 (Item continued from August 19. 1987 maetiog). RHSOLUTION NO. 87-456 300 A ReSOLOTION OP TN6 CITY COUNCIL OP THH QTY OP RANCfIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TN8 WMMONITY DSVHLOYMHNT BLOCK GRANT 1986-87 ~ GRANTBH PBRPORMANC6 RHPORT AU7AORIZING T8B i MAYOR AND CITY CLERA TO SIGN SAlB AND ~ DIRHCTING THAT THB REPORT B8 SlIBMITTBD TO TN8 U. a. ua riua a.+naa ue riuu alive, iuii uiwefri DHVffi.OPlENT 8. ENVIRONMHNTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA C0I4fUNITY PLAN 301 AM8IIDMENT 87-01 - NILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to mend the Victoria Community Plan tent to reduce the minimm required lot depth on 3,000 agnere foot lots from 75 feet to 60 feet, to reduce the minimum requited lot depth on 4,000 square foot lots from 80 feet to 70 ~ feet, end to require a minimum ten (30) foot front yard seibeck for the living area on 3,000 and 4,000 square I~ ~ I i i i ~ i foot lots. ~, ~., ti`.,, PAGE City Council Agenda Septeaber 16, 1987 12 ( ORDINANCE N0. 322 (first reading) 316 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~ O S MN ~ %T~ ~ MODIFY TR COCO NI TY PLAN TO AHDOCE 18 THE MINIMDM LOT DEPTH OH 3,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTR FRON 75 FEET TO 60 FRET, TO REDO(8 THE ( MINILAIM LOT DEPTH ON 4,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS JI PROM 80 FEET TO 70 FEET, AND TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM TBN (30) FOOT P1tONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE LNING AREA ON 3,000 AND 4,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS. 9. APPROVAL OP RNVIRONMHNTAL ASSBSSMBNT AND ISSUANCE OP A 317 NEGATIVE DECLARATION POR T116 PROpOSBD 1fILLIREN AVENGE GRADE SEPARATION - It is recomeaded that the City Council approve tfie attached Resolution apprwiag the Bmironmmtsl Aeseasnent end ieamace of a Negative Declerstion for the proposed Milliken Avenue Grsde Separation at the Atchieoa, Topake and Santa Pe Reilray Crossing north of Siztfi Street. RESOLUTION NO. B7-506 328 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY DF RAaVHV VV UVRIMaM, VaL Lf VM11Y1M, .LL NVV IiN THE EPNIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY I AND ISSUANCE OP A NHOATIVE DECLARATION POR THE PROPOSED MILL IKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION ' ~ ; ~ 10. APPEAL OF PARCEL MAP 5996 - DAVID HOWDEN -The appeal 329 II of the Conditions of Approval requiring en in-lieu Fee for the future undergrounding of the eaieting warhead util itiee for this project located on the south aide of Wilson Avenue, vest of Maven Avenue. II I III ]1. ORDERING THE WORK IH CONNECTION KITH: ' ~ ~ A_ ANNEXATION N0. 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 9504 (TERRA VISTA) 353 ~ ~ . TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4. ( ~ i j RESOLUTION N0. 87-507 354 I ' ± A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~ ~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE i WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. t T'0 I I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 i ~ ~ ~ AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ~ - PARCEL MAP 9504 r r ~-s3'>' ~. t~'r -, ~' ct,~ PACe city Co~mcil Agenda September 16, 1987 13 B. ANNffiATION N0. 29 AND 22 POR TRACT ND. 12914 LOCATED AT TIUi NORTIDiAST OORNBR OP ARCHIBALD AND HIGHLAND AVHNUE TO STRAET LIGHTING lAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2, RHSPECTIYELY, RBSOLPTZON N0. 87-508 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF TRS QTY OP RANL'HO CUCAMINGA ORDERING THE WORK IN WNNECTION WITR ANNERATION N0. 29 TO STR88T LIGHTING NAINTBNANLB DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEFTING THE FINAL PNGINBER'S REPORT POR TRACT NO, 12914 RESOLOTION N0. 87-509 A RffiOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OP RANQIO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDBRING THR WORK IN CONNHCTION WITN ANNBEATION N0. 22 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTHNANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 AND ACCEPTING TR8 FINAL SNGINEffi'S RLRORT POR TRACE N0. 12914 C, ANNBEATION N0. 3 FOR PARCei. MAP 10696 DR 87-02 DA 86-05 (PARCEL MAP 10444 DR 85-52 AND DR 85-48 TO STRHBT LIGNT1Nli MA1ffl'EIV11nl:¢ u1J'1'n1l:i' nu. o, RffiOLUTION N0. 67-510 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CU CAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNERATION N0. 3 2L1 STRBET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI STRI Cf N0. 6 AND ACCHPTING THB FINAL ENGINEER'S AHYORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-OS (PARCEL HAP 10444), DR 05-52 PND DR 85-48 ^. ANNRYATION N0. 30 FOR PAACHL MAP 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-05 (PARCEL MAP 10444), DR 85-52 AND DR 85-48 TRACT NOS. 12671-1 THRU -4 AND TRACT N0. 12650-3 Iv STREET iiGH7ING HAIhTHP:AIiGE DISTRICT ::0. 1. i 1 u 359 360 366 372 373 383 1`_ ~` ~, ~ r, *'~ PAGE City Co~mcil Agenda Septeaber 16, 1987 14 RESOLUTIOp N0. 87-511 A RHSOLUTION OP THE QTY COUNCIL OP THB QTY OF RANCHO COCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN NNNBCTION WITR ANNH1tATION NO. 30 TO STRSBT LIGHTING NAINTffiIANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING 1HE FINAL ffiiGINEER'S REPORT FDA PARCHL MAP 10096, DR 87-02, DR 60-05 (PARCEL MAP 10444), DR 85-52 AND DR 85-48, TRACE NOS. 12671-1 TNAU -4 AND TRACE N0. 12650-3 H. ANN88ATION DIO. 7 POR TRACT NOS. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 AND 12671-4 (TERRA FISTA) TO STREET LIGHTING MATNT6NANC8 DISTRICT NO. 4. RESOLUTION N0. 87-512 A AESOLOTION OP THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE QTY OF RANC80 WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN ODNNECTION WITkI ANNBRATION NO. 7 TO STREET LIGATIIVG MAIIiTBNANC6 DI6TRICT N0. 4 AND ACCEPTING THB FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT POR TRACE NO6. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 AND 12671-4 F. ANNHIATION N0. 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 12071-1, 12671-2, 120/1-! anU ltuii-4 (InMin Yi uliy Iv Li+iu,uCi,iu MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 87-513 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIR)NGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORR IN CONNECTION WITH ANNERATION NO. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINT6NAN(Z+ DISTRICT N0. 4 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACE NOS. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 AND 12671-4 G, ANNEYATION N0. ' POR PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 86-OS (PARCEL MAP 10444), DR 85-52 AND DR "05-48 TC 7..11,DSCAFE NAIATBNANCE DISTRICT 1X7. 3. 384 396 397 403 404 409 ~~ ti.., PAGE City Co~mcil Agenda September 16, 1987 15 RHSOLUTION N0. 87-514 410 A RffiOLDTZON OP THE CIT4 COUNCIL OP THB QTY OP RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING 'Il1E WOAR IN ODNNECTION WITH ANNEXATZON N0. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTBNANCS DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCHPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 86-05 (PARCEL MAP 10444), DR 85-52 AND DR 85-48 R. ANNBHATION N0. 37 POR TFACT NOS. 12650-3 AND 419 11549-1 (MHDIAN) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTHNANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. RffiOLUTION NO. 87-515 420 A RffiOLUTION OP '1118 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMDNCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDBRING TNH WORK IN CONNBCfION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 37 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTB2IANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING TH6 FINAL ffi7GINEER'S REPORT POA TRACE NOS. 12650-3 AND 11549-1 (MHDIAN) I. ANIBSXATION NO. 21 POR TRACE 12650-3 LOCATED NORTH 426 OF HILLSIDE, HAST 08 HAVEN AVHNUE TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2. 1_ __-.. RESOLUTION N0. B7-516 427 A RESOLUTION OP TRH CITY WllNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO WCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE MORE IN WNNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 21 TO HTREHT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACE N0. 12650-3 J. ANNEXATION N0. 6 POR PARCEL MAP 9504 (TERRA VISTA) 432 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DI STRY CT N0. 4. RESOLUTION NO. 87-517 433 A RHBGLUIIGH Ge^ T ^c wY^L WL'NCIL CP :.[E CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THB WORR IN WNNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 6 Tb LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND ACCEPTING THE PINA[. ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 9504 v~ , ~, T ~~ YACe •° ~ g ~ ~ City Cowcil Agenda ° r September 16, 1987 e`~'y y`. 3 16 P. PUBLIC HEARINGS The follwing it®a hsve no legal publ icatioa or poatiag ~ cequicetents. The Chair will opea the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. APPEAL OP STAFF DECISION TO AEMOV6 THH MEDIAN ISLAND IN 436 THB 9200 BLOCK OF MONfE VISTA. 2. ADOPTION BY CITY COUNCIL OP A IUISOLUTION OF NECEBBITY 444 TO ACOUIRB 8Y SMIN6NT ]10MAIN AN HASENSNT ACROSS A i PORTION OF TBIiEB REAL YROPSRTI85 LOCATED AT THB SOVTENEST CORNER OP TURNBR AVENUE AND MAIN STREBT FOR THB CONSTRUCTION OF Tffi AAHA VII STORM DRAIN. RffiOI.tlTION NO. 87-518 445 A RffiOLOTION OP TRB CITY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, TO ACQUIRH I AN BASBlE3NT ACROSS TRRBE PROPERTIES BY BMINffi7T DOMAIN FOR TNH ODNSTRUCfION OF A STORM DRAIN G. CITY MANAGER'S STAPP REPORTS The fC7.lwing items do not legally require any public ~ teetimo,ry, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. i 1. 10TH ANNIVERSARY COM74ITP68 UPDATE -pursuant to the 450 City Council~e request the 10th Anniversary Committee has provided additional information regarding the Anniversary Celebration. '~ I 2. P.EVIEW OP PARR DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE. (Item 455 i il i l i i ' continued from September 2, 1987 meeting.) l it _~i j L - -- ---- - +,£~. ~,~~~~ .,. PAGE City Council Agenda September 36, 1987 17 RESOLUTION N0. 87-489 A RESOLiYEION Op THE CS13 COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIJNGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AVER=:;E ODST PER ACRH TO DEVELOP PARR LAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SSTABLISAING AVERAGE COST P$R ACRE BY LAND llSB DESIGNATION TO ACQUIRB PARR LAND TN RANCHO CUCAMDNGA 3. UPDATE ON MHRCY AMBULANCE RESPONSE TIME, (Item continued from September 2, 1987 meeting. The Rancho Cuesaomga Rade~alop~®t Agency rill zecom~®e to hold • joint meeting rith the Clty Coancil, 4. ANARD OF HIDS POR TN6 PUBLIC SAFHTY AND CIVIC FACILITY - to be located at the northeast corner of Civic Center Drive and Haven Avenue on approzimetely 7 acres of land pined bq ibe City of Rancho Cucmonge. Project to include construction of public safety facility, secured packing structure for public safety operations, civic center admdnietration building, council chambers, associated oneite and offeite imprwaente, and furnishings: A. General Contractor: Henry Construction MOIV WII• V~ •~ • i B. Furnishings Supplier; Seal Furniture 6 Systems Inc. Amount: $1,529,432 I i . i i i I i ~ IIIIIII ~_~ : _~.~ 5. SELECTION OF RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES - to prw ids soils end materiels testing fot the development find eonettuction of the public esf sty and civic facility, 6. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT HY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY establ iehing sources of funds to be paid for the development of the public safety end civic facility. The Aancho Cucemoaga Redovolopment Agency rill cenglete its meeting sod than Adj Ors. The City Council meeting rill continue sfter the campletioa of the Redavelopent Agency meeting. 456 459 462 477 _::~': PAGE City Council Agenda September 16, 1987 18 H. CAUNCIL AUSINBSS The follw ing trans hove been requested by the City Council for discuseiw. Tbeq are not public hearing itme, although the Chair may open the meeting foz public input. NONE SUBMITTED. I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS POR NEST HBETING Thin ie the time foz City Council to identify the items they rieh to disease at the nest meeting. Thaee items rill not be diecuamed at this meeting, only identified for the nett westing. J. COMMUNICATIONS PROM TH6 PUBLIC This ie the Lire and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing a~ issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive teotimoay and sec lhtl ma •~e~ u cy.. . up. wLr...A.. ..:C .. be limited io five minor ee pez ~indiv idual. x. AD~ouRrB+eNT Meeting to adjourn to September 22, 1987 at 5:30 p. m., Lions Patk Community Centex for the purpose of a City Goals Workshop. I, Beverly A. Authel et, City C1 etk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify theta true, accurate copy of tha foregoing agenda was poet ed on September 11, 1987, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per A. A. 2674 v~ a~c~-C BasE .,tr.~ .,cad. I j . ,....L. J., h.~. . }-`i ;~1~ _~C.t July 1, 1987 CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINOTBS Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDHR A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, July 1, 1487, is the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Awd, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting vea celled to order at 7:33 p. m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Comcilmembere: Deborah N. Brown, Charl ea J. Buquet, Jeffrey Ring, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. StouC. Also present were: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager; Deputy City Gl ark, Debra Ademe: City Attorney, Jmes Narla•an; Sr. Administrative Aeaietaat. Nnrk Lorimer; Community bevel opmeni Director, Sack Lem: City Engineer, Rune Maguire; City Pl ginner, Brad Huller; Building Official, Jerry Grant; end Community Services Director, Bill Nolley. Absent: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager * • * e R H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Commwity Naete to Energy Workshop Honday, July 20, 1987, 7:00 to 10:00 p. m. at the L1one rarX lAmmunlty COntet, Gallery Eeat. H2. Pzeeentetion of Procl emation to Daughters of the American Revolution commemorating the 200th anniversary of the United States Conetitut ion. 83. Councilmember Hrown added that at a meeting she attended for the Revenue and Taxation Committee with the League of California Cities, there is en initiative proposed to emend the Genn Appropriations Limit, end there ie a bill being proposed to expend the authority under the lighting and lendeceping act which would include land acquisition for pe tka, recreation or open apace. This is being worked on now end may be added to whet we already have. She also added that a Resolution had been passed io irrveetiga to zhe creation of California ineurence for non-profit orgeniz atione for all Cal ifornie cities which would get rid of the commercial ineurence induet ry that has created problems fot so many cities. They are hoping that if all the California cities ids gat LvgeLhe[ uu lh La and pool their money iogflther, it could be e non-profit organization through the League of Cities. BG. Councilmember Buquet stated he had attended en Omnitrena meeting today. He stated he spoke out on the 3 per car idea and hov he felt the feet lane of free,, aye could be taken out end made into a diamond lane. • ~ A • k City Council Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 2 C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Approval of Minutes: April 13, 1987 April 29, 1987 Mey 6, 1987 (BUquet absent) C2.. Apprwel of Warrants, Register Noss. 6/10/87 and 6/17/87 and Payroll ending 6/11/87 for the total amount of $4,799,388.23. C3. Apprwel to receive and file currant Investment Schedule ae of June 24, 1987. C4. Apprwel of map, execution of improvement agreements and improvement securities for Traci 13342, located et the northeast corner of Mezmoea Avenue and 19th Street, submitted by Pennon Design and Development and Piret Nati ox,wide Mortgage Compelry. RESOLUTION N0. 87-292 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND PINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13342 C5. Apprwel to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bide^ for the improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing approximately 1/2 mile north of Baee Line Aoad. NE80LU'1'l0N NU, tl/-!SU A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APYP.OV ING PLANS AND SPECI PI CATIONS FOR THE ^ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT THE SOUTHERN PACI FiC RAILROAD CROSSING APPROXIMATPLY 1/2 MILE NORTH OF SASE LINE ROAD", IN ,'AID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECIING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECENE BIDS C6. Apprwel of map, execution of improvement agreement and improvement security for Tract 10349 located on the vest aide of Sapphire Street, south of Jennet Street, submitted by Walton Management Service Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. ft7-331 A RESULU'i'lUN Oe T`dE CT T'i COuNCiL u[ TriE CiTi OF RANCriO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGAEEt~@NT. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACE N0. 10349 (9. Approval to release real property improvement contract and lien agreement recorded Apz it 20, 1987, ae Document No, 87-12867.4 and approval ~f a new reel property improvement contrac[ and lien agr eemenc (CO 87-066} and pe reel map 10543, submitted by Arrw Rancho Cucamonga Limited. City Council Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 3 RESOLUTION N0. 87-332 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NUMBER 10543 (TENTATNE PARCEL MAP NO. 10543) AND ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT OONTRACT AND LIEN AGREIIIENT PROM AKRON RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIMITED RESOLUTION N0. 87-333 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCMIONGA, CALIFORNIA, Rffi.EAS ING AREAL ITtOPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEt~NT PROM ARROW RANCHO CUCAMDNGA LIMITED C8. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (CO 87-067) for Parcel Map 9687 located on the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Santa Anita Avenue, submitted by lltrner end Jones Development. RESOLUTION N0. 87-334 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COllNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FOR PAR GEL MAP 9667 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN RAME C9. Approval of Contzact Change Order No. 4 (CO 85-63) for the preparation of designs, cooetruction plans, epecificatione end cost estimates for the Uey Creek Channel improvement project by Boyle-Ludy ig Engineering, in the amount of $30,298, bringing the total contract amount to $571,361 to be paid from Day Creek Funds. AP.SOLUTION N0. B7-335 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THP. CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER N0. 4 TO OD ES-63, AN AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT BERVICES POR THP. PREPARATION OP DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COST ESTIMATES E'OR THE LAY CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT C10. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 4 (CO 85-62) for the preparation of finest rsnatruction plans end specif icetione for Dey Creek Channel Improvement Project by Wil ldan Associates in the amount of $ii8,4iv bringing the total contract amount to $625,783 to be paid from Dey Creek Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 07-336 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP twNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONTRACT GRANGE ORDER N0. 4 TO CO 86-62, AN PG REEt~NT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOA THE PREPARATION OP CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DAY City Council Minutes July 1, 1967 Page 4 Cil. Approval to award the Victoria Park Lane Reconstruction and Relandscaping Project to Summit Grading end Paving, Incorporated, and execute the contract documents (CO 87-068) for the amount of $628,297.50 to be funded from the Landscape Maintenance Aseeeament District No. 2. C12. Approval to award and execute 87/88 fiscal year service agreement with L. D. King, Incorporated (CO 87-069), Aaemcieted Hngineera (CO 87-070), Hackett and Kranz ez Surveying (CO H7-071). and Sanderson 6 Associates (CO 87-072) for design and construction, surveying/staking services, not to exceed $5,000 per survey project and with Pioneer Consul iante (CO 87-073), end Richard Mills Associates (CO 87-074) for design and conetructi on, Boils/materials leafing, not to exceed $2,000 far each testing project. C13. Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds and notice of completion £or: Parcel Map 8298 located on the west aide of Turner Avenue south of Beae Liae Road. Ael ease: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $84,068 RESOLUTION N0. 87-337 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMJNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TNH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR rHl(LGL „Wr 6L y8 AIYU flU1nUn1L1Ma 1nC CLL 1CAr UC a nU'1'11:E VN COMPLETION FOR THE WORE DR 85-52 located on the southeast corner of 6ih Street and Pitta burgh Avenue. Rel secs: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $15,000 RESOLUTION N0. 87-338 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COllNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANCHO N CAMOhGA, CAL IE'ORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 85-52 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF wuTi,ETi0iv v~R idE WGRK Parcel Map 9079 located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Roed. Release: Faithful Pe rformence Bond (Street) $27,946 City Council Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. B7-339 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMDNGA, CALIFORNZA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9079 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C14. P.pprwel to release Faithful Performance Bond ($21,000) end Material end Labor Bond ($10,500) for DR 85-34 located at the northveet corner of Toronto Avenue and 7th Street. C15. Apprwal to reject all proposals received for the Raneho Cucamonga Trail Implementation Study as recommended by the Park Development Commission. ITBN REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY MAYOR STOUT. C16. Apprwal of contract (CO 87-075) with Weatek for personal computer and peripheral maintenance of selected hardware in the amount of $11,376.00. C17. Apprwal of contract (CO 87-076) with Tel ecommunicatione Management Corporation (TMC) in the amount of $800 providing cable telavieion consul tent aseistence for the City's performance review of DCA Cabl wieion. C18. Apprwal of Resolution ackawledging the cal ebretion of the 200th anniversary of the signing of the United Stetee Constitution and declaring September 17, 1987 ae Constitution Day in Rancho Cucamonga. ITHM RIDM)VED FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMBER BROWN. n'cuvLLTiOii iei, v. ~~iG A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OEQ.ARING SEPTEMBER 17, 1987, AS CONSTITUTION DAY IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA COlR~MORATING THE 200TH ANNNERSARY OF THE SIGNING OF THE UNITED STATES OJNSTITllTION C19. Apprwal of short term loan to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation in the amount of $6,000 for the purposes of Foundation Board of Directors [reining end Bevel opmer.t. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMEER KING. C20. Approval end execution of a two-year maintenance services contract (CO 87-077) with Orange County Striping to install and repaint street centerline and lane line striping and various other stteei markings on yubl is streets in the City o. ..,..^.chc C__,Yc.^.gs fror J.•~y ', tnE? to July ~, 19 one RESOLUTION N0. 87-341 A RESOLUTION OP TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'J CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TWO-YEAR NIAINTENA., CE SERVICES CONTRACT WITH ORANGE COllNTY STRI PINC TO MAINTASN STREET STRIPING AND STENCIL MARKINGS ON PUBLIC STREETS IN THE CITY OE' RANCHO CUCAMONGA City Council Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 6 C21. Approval of authorization for City Attorney to prepare and City Manager to execute Hold Harml esa Letier with Joe DiIorio and Betty McKay for purposes of holding Day Creek ground breaking ceremonies on privately awned land. C22. Approval of agreement (CO 87-078) for installation of public improvement and dedication between Andrew 5. Hsu and Margaret L.L. Hsu end the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements et 9487 and 9515 Beae Line Road. RESOLUTION N0. 87-342 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR IN RTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEI~@NT AND DEDI GTION PROM ANDREW S. HSU AND MARGARET L.L. HSU AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERR TO SIGN SAt~ C23. Approval of agreement (CO 87-079) for ineiallation of public imptwement and dedication between AT b T Communications of Cal if ornifl, Inc. end the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements at 8522 Arrow Route. RESOLUTION NO. 87-343 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CO CAMDNGA, CALI PORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDI GTION FROM AT S T COMMUNIGTIONS OP CALIFORNIA, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE wnvno nwm nr my neov mn crn ~, caw C24. Approval and execution of prof es eicnal services agreement (CO H7-O BOi with Mohl e, Grover 6 As sociatee for the design of six (6) traffic signals at various locations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $35,000.00 to be funded from the 1987-88 Traffic Signal Fund. C25. Approval to authorize [he advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bide" for the construction of the Civic Center/Public Safety facility project located at the northeast corner of Civic Center Drive end Haven Avenue. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION AS REQUESTED EY COUNCILMEMBER WRIGHT. RESOLUTION NO. 87-343 A RSCOLUI'ION OF' 1T{E CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF RANCHO ~-ii f.AM^?R:A, fAi.i FORM A, A7PR~iV iNt: 7l,,AN$ AND 4'rR C.i Fif¢?70NS FOR THE "CIVIC CENTER/PUBLIC SAFBTY FACILITY PROTECT^, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHOAIZ ING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECENE BIDE C26, npproval to execute a two-year contract with Tom DeMi~..co for the performance of ree ident inspection services for the Civic Center/Public SaFety fecil ity in an amount not to exceed $240,000. ITEM RBMOVED FOR DI ECG SSION AS RD~UEETED BY COUNCILMEMBER WRIGNT. City Council Minut ee July 1, 1987 Page 7 C27. Approval of Resolution ordering preparation of Reapportionment Report and approval of resolution passing on reapportionment report for Parcel Map 9508 and Parcel Map 10223 within the Sizth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82-1R), giving preliminary approval, end setting a time and place for public hearing. RESOLUTION N0. 87-344 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY CAllNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REAPPORTION!ffiNT REPORT AND AMHNDED ASS&SSI~HT AND DIAGRAH IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMEIT FEES POR PARCEL MAP 9508 AND PARCBT. MAP 10223 WITHIN THE SI%TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PARR REFUND DISTRICT (82-1 R) RESOLUTION N0. 87-345 A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT FOR PARCEL NAP 9508 AND PARCEL HAP 10223, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPRWAL AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE POR PUBLIC NEARING C28. Approval of proposal for Pi re Services Peesibil ity Study submitted by Ralph Anderson and Associates in fln amomt net to exceed $6,500. C29. Approval to paint speed limit markings an streets. C30. Approval to annex 't'ract no. iV.1 qY tocetea on the west exile ox 5appnxre Street, south of Jennet Street to Lan de cape Maintenance District No. 1 ae Annexation No. 36 end setting the date of public hearing for August 5, 1987. RESOLUTION N0. 87-346 i•. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COll NCIL OF THE CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 36 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION N0. 87-347 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TC OPJ3ER THE i+liNcriATiGN TG LidvDSCAPc HAiNT9'inHCE DiSTRi C-. NG. i, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRI Cf: GRSIGNATING SAID ANNERATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 36 TO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PllRSIIANT TO THE tANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TII~@ AND PLACE FOR HEARING OHJECfIONS THERETO C31. Approval to annex Tract Na. 10349 located on the weer aide of Sapphire Street south of Jennet Street to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 ee annexation No. 26 and Street Lighting Me intenance District No. 2 ee ennezetion '~ .~ City Council Ifinutea July 1, 1987 Page 8 RESOLUTION N0. 87-348 A RHSW,UTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMOt~A, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROPAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 26 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTBNANCB DISTRICT N0. 1 RESOLUTTON NO. 87-349 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMOIdGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION Tb STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESS!ffiNT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEILITION AS ANNEXATION N0. 26 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THB LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THER61b RESOLUTION N0. 87-350 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCMU WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPRWAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 20 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 RESOLUTION N0. 87-351 A RESOLllTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO .. IA. D'uwiti,Iiw, iaa ln'ram'1'lUN '1{1 UltOER 'SHE ANNEXATION TO STRHET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 20 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; PURSUANT T'0 THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACf OF 1972 AND OFPERTNC A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C32, Set public hearing - July 15, 1987 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87-01 - CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA - An Amendment to modify the Etiw soda Specific Plan es follow e: Figure 5-18 "Community Trails^, by rel oceting the Community Equestrian Trail to the south aide o£ 24th Street e 6ai of the Loop Roed; Figure 5-19 ^Imprwed Sidevalke", east of the Loop Road; and Figure 5-35 ^24th Street, Feet of Loop^, to ehw a 96 foot street right-of-vey with a 20 foot Community Pquestzian Trail on the south aide pas kway. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Brwn to epprwe the Coneen[ Gel ender minus items 15. 18, 19, 25 and 26. Motion carried unanimously. •*a+ t• Discussion of Item 15. Apptwal to raj set tIl propoaalm received for the Rtncho Cueemmga Ttmil Lplamamutiw Study u rmco~endmd hl Che Park Oewmlopm®t f.mmmiaaiam. II'RI RAIDFBD POA DISCOSSIO~ AS REGU63T® 6Y MAIO1 S1OUT. City Council Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 9 Mayor Stout commented that be felt study should be accompl iehed in-house and that the City Council should be iwolved. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Brown to approve Item 15. Motion carried LLnanlaOLLaly 5-D, R1tflfi Diecueeion of Item 18. Approval of R.aaalntim aclmorladging the celebration of the 200th ami~srury of the signing of the United 8tatu Conatifatioa and declaring Septaabez 17, 1987 as Constitatioa Day is Rancho Cncaamga. ITIDI RIDR7P® FOR DISWSSIOE AS REQDESY'® ES OOIIIICQ.lWOBR SROUR. Council member Bran stated she would like to knw what the City ie doing on any celebrations that are being planned. Aaeistent City Manager, Robert Rizzo, vac directed to inform the Comcil of these activities. RHSOLUTION N0. 87-340 A RHSOLUTION OP THE CITY CODNCIL OP THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING SEPTHMBHR 17, 1987, AS CONSTITUTION DAY IN RANCHO CUCAIDNCA COMMEMORATING YNE 200TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE SIGNING OP TEH UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown io approve Item 16. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Diecuesion of Item 19. Approval of sbozt tan loan to the Rancho Cncsaonga Csaauaity Poandation in the aao®t of $6,000 for the putpowa of Pormdatlon Eoard of Director training and davalopamt. IS&f RBMOVRD FOR DI3COSSION AS REQUHST® BY COUNCIL10Dt8BR RIW. Council member King stated the[ the Foundation wee to be a private entity and chat the Council would na[ be asked to eaeiet thm. Mayor Stout disagreed with Councilmember King. Councilmember Huquet agreed with Mayor Stout. Council members Brown and Wright agreed with Council member King, MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buq uet to approve Item 19, Motion failed 2-3 (Brown, King, Wright). *+.*x~ Disc uesion of Item 25. Approval to authoriea the advertising of the "Rotiw Iariting Bids" for [hs constrectiom of tM Civic CmNr/Pabl is Safety feMlity project located at the Roztheut corwr of Civic Cantor Drive and Bevan Avenue. I1'@1 RIDgV~ !OR DISCOSSIOM AS REQU68TRD E2 COUNCitJ~O)IDt WRIOBT. Ciq Coreil Nlamtr Jml~ 1. 1987 pa8a 10 Diaeaasiw of Its 26. Approval to recute a tro-~aar cwtrut mith Sr DeMiaico for tW pesfoz>tree of rridri iaapertiw aervicet for the Civic Crcer/Public 8afeq facility in m sort not to stead $2A0,000. ITAI RID87V® PO8 DISCOSSIOE AS 1®QD68'l® 87 ODONC[LIOQmI~ NRIGBS. Comcilmrber Nright did not feel she had any input in the plemiag of this project so therefore she vas voting ^no^ on these iieme. She did agree, horever, that it vas a beautifully designed building. Comcilmember Baguet added that there had been several meetings which the Council took part in et which time the pl inning of the civic center pee discussed. Councilmember Brawn said she agreed with Councilaember Nright indicating she had not given any input since she came into office in November, 1956. RESOLUTION N0. 87-343 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY CODNCIL OP TEE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GLIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI PIGTIONS FOR TBE ^CIVIC CENTEA/PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY PRQTECf", IN SAID CITY AND AllTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERR TO ADVERTISE TD RECEIVE BIDS MOTION: Roved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve Itre 2S and 26. Notion carried 3-1-0-1 (Nright voted no, Brwn abstained). D. CONSENT ORDINANCES NO ITEMS SUBMITTED E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS E1. ADOPTION BY REPSRENCE MODEL CODES - CITY OF RANCHO CUGHONGA - Coneideration of various codes ee publ iehed by the Intermtioaal Conference of Building Officials and/or the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials or the Ne[ioml Pi re Protection Ae sociation. OONTINUBD FROM JUNE 17, 1987 MEETING. Staff report by Jerry Grant, Building Official. Mayor Stout asked if the new block wall prw ioion vas a part of the new Ordinance. Mr. Grant anew eyed yea. Mey or Stout el so inquired if the high wind requirements had been incorporated into the new Ordinance. City Comcil Minutes July 1. 1987 Page 11 Mr. Grant indicated it bed not been, but that ii would be as soon ae more information rae available. lle said be vas working with the International Co¢ference of Building Officials ozga¢iz etion to get all information on this eubj act. Mayor Stout opened the seating for public hearing. There being no response. the public hearing ras closed, Deputy City Clerk Ademe read the title of Ordinance No. 311. ORDINANCE N0. 311 (fire[ reeding) AN ORDINANCE OF THH CITY COONCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAi.IPORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.08, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24 AND 15.28 OP TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRIICfION, OP 17tH RANCHO COCA1[7NGA HUNICI PAL ODDE IN TEEIR @7TZRETY, AND SBCTIONS 2, 3. 4, 7, 9. AND 10 OP 17TH SAN BP.IWARDINO ODUNTY CODE ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 17: AND ADOPTING BY REPBRENC6 1718 "UNIFORM ADMINSSTRATIYS CODE", 1985 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE", 1985 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THffitETO; THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS", 1985 BDITION; 1EE ^ONIPORN lBCAANICAL ODDS", 1985 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES TBBREI'O; TNH "ITNIFORM PLUMBING CODE", 1985 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPHNDICHS; TEE "NATIONAL ELECTRICAL ODDB^, 1987 EDITION; TMH "UNIFORM ODDE FOR 'lH6 ABATEIffiTT OP DANGERWS BUILDINGS", 1985 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM NOOSING ODE^, 1985 EDITION; TE8 "UNIFORM BUILDING iwiTiup: iiiin wniA1rv tinn¢U11¢n't'J, ADDITIONS, WDELBTIONSWAND EACEPfIONS TO SAID CODES, INCLUDING PENALTIES MOTION: Moved by Kiag, seconded by Stout to raive full reeding of Ordinance No. 311 and set second reading for .Tiny 15, 1987. Motion carried u¢animouely 5-0. + • ~ • ~ + MOTION: Moved by Brwn, seconded by Buquet to continue Item E2 to August 5, 1987. Motion carried unenimouely 5-0. • * * x * w Nr. Pizzc gene brief eaple¢aticr. cM.,• this Fns being continued. City Comcil Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 12 E3. ENpIRONMENTAL A358SSlO;NT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-02B - CITY OP IIANCHO CUCANONGA - A request to amend the Lend Uee Hlement of the General Plaa froth: A. Heavy Industrial to General Industrial for epprozimately 106 scree at the future ewtheeat corner of Arrw Highway sad Utica Avenue to the future intersection of Arrw Highway and Milliken Avenue; and for approzisetely 52 acres at the eouiheaet corner of Arrw Highway and Rochester Avenue; end far epprozimately 7.5 acres on the aoutheaet corner of Etiwaada and Nhittram Avenue; and B. General Industrial to Industrial Yark for approziHately 35 acres on the northeast corner of Arrw Highway and White Oek Avenue; and C. General Industrial/Rail Served to General Industrial for all arses currently deeigsated as General Industrial/Rail Served. Staff report by Otto Kroutil, Sr. Planner. Mayaz Stout opened the Heating for public bearing. There being no response, the public hearing vas closed. lX~TION: Moved by Stout, eecooded by Ring to approve Resolution No. 87-352. Motion carried meniaouely 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 87-352 A RHSOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO i ~~V N;1A, n[[nUVJM, lsan nltifl. rLMll Mman UflEn'1' nV. 87.02B,N~~AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OP THE RANCHO CUCANONGA GENERAL PLAN E4. anarca'aneuveu Lt sralol' NV. ]. staff report by Ruecell Maguire, City Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting fez public l.eazing. There being no response, the public hearing wee cl Deed. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 87-353. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. RESULUTION N0. 87-353 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CU CAlUNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TNB WORK IN CgNNECTION WITN ANNEEATION NO. Z TO LANDSCAY6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTItT THE PINAL ENC INEER'S REPORT FOR DR 86-33 City Comcil Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 13 MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to epprwe Resolution No. 87-354. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. RESOLUTION N0. 87-354 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANQiO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNESATION N0. 23 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NDB. 11997, 12835, 01246 AND DR 86-12 86 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2. Staff report a9 Ruaaea• tmguzre, amity mgineez. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for publ iC hearing. There being no response, the public hearing Mao el owed. NOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to epprwe Resolution No. 67-355. M•• .. .. .:.rru6e...~lj ... RESOLUTION N0. 87-355 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITX COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO Q1CAM7NGA, CAL IFOIiNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNERATION N0. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE PINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACE NOS. 11997 AND 10246 e s ~ MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to epprwe Reeol ution No. 87-365. Motion carried unanimously 5-0, Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public bearing was closed. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was cl oeed. City Council Hi¢utaa July 1. 1987 Page 14 RESOLUTION N0. 87-356 A AESOLDTION OF TNH CITY COUNCIL OP THE QTY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING 1H8 WORE IN CONNECTION WITH ANNE2ATION N0. 34 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THS FINAL ENGINEER'S RHYORT FOR TRACE NOS. 11997, 12835, 10246 AND DR 86-12 • * * ~ Fl. itee. F. PUBLIC lHiARINGS Engineer. stating no further ectio¢ vas deeded o¢ MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright to remove Iteo P1 from the agenda. Motion carried uaaoimoualy 5-0. RESOLUTION N0. 87-326 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEHR, ACTING AS .. -i:ru~Dntii ve slaa¢'1's. '1V YHUhBHO WITH THE INSTALLATION OF FRONTAGE IMJ?It09EMENTS AT APN 207-262-39 OP SUCK IMPRWE!ffiHTS NAVE NOT BEEN INSTALLHD 60 DAYS AFTER TUNE 5, 3987, WHEN THE NOTICE TO OONSTRUCf WAS POSTHD TN ACOORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 27 OP THE IMPROVEMENT ACf OP 1911, SAID PARCEL IS LOCATED ON ARROW ROUTE WITHIN THE ARROW ROUTE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPRWEMHNT PRQiECT e • * h A F2. ADOPTION BY REFERENCE PORTIONS OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODE - Conaide ration of various eertione of Div ieion 3, Title III of the San Bernardino County Uniform Environmental Heel th Code and setting a public hearing for August 5. 1987. Staff report by Mark Lorimer, Sr. Administrative Analyst, Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing, There being no response, the public hearing was cl oaed, De VUty City C1 etk Adams read the title of Ordinance No. 317. City Cowcil Minutes .Tiny 1, 1987 page 15 ORDINANCE N0. 317 (preliminary reading) AN ORDINANCB OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO COCAMDNGA, GLIFORNLA, AMENDING 1N6 RANCHO CUCAMDNGA NONICI PAL CODE BY THS ADDITION OP A NEW CHAPTER 8.20 TO TITLB 8 THERHOP AND ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, ORDINANCE NO. 3105 OP 1TIS COONfY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMeNDING DZPISIONS 1 TNRODGH 6 OF TITLE 3 AND RESTATING VARIODS RHGIILATORY PROVISIONS OP T[iE ODDNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AEALTR SffitVICES COVERING: FOOD, DAIRIBS, WATER, TO%ICS, WASTES, VECTORS, HOUSING, RECRBATION, AND OTHHR SUl7i ENVIRONMHNTAL HEALTR R~ULATDRY SUBJECTS, WITH CERTAIN AMENDL~NTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EKCBPTIONS. ItTQDDING FEES AND PENALTIES MOTION: Noved bq King, seconded by Buquet to set the public hearing for August 5, 1987. Motion carried wenimoualy 5-0. * + ~ * # P3. ANBNDNBNT TO TITLE 2 OP TNH MUNICIPAL CODB ESTABLISHING A PARES AND RECREATION COMMISSION WITHIN TH8 CITY OF RANCHO COCAM.ONGA - Mendment to Title 2 of the Rancho Cucenonga Mmicipal Code rescinding a Yar4 Devel opaent Commission and estebl iehing a Perks end Aeerentioe Commission within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Staff report by Biil Holley, Community Services Director. Mayor St oui opened the meeting for the public hearing. There being ao -~ • ,. r.. r ....r... Covncilmember Wright made suggestion to change Section 2.52.060, "Powers and Dutiea^ within Ordinance No. 315. Deputy City Clerk Ademe read the title of Ordinance No. 318. ORDINANCE N0. 318 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA REPeALING CHAPTER 2.52 AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 2.52 TO TITLE 2 OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODH RELATING 1D THH CREATION OF A PARK AND RECREATION WMMISSION MC7TON: Moved by $rpnt, ee¢eaded T3' Wrigh[ to wfl±ve fu12 reading of Ordirance No. 318 end set second reading for July 15, 1987. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. w ~ ~ + City Comcil Miautea July 1, 1987 Page 16 G. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS G1. REPORT FROM PAAR DBVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGARDING RED HILL LAKE. CONTIIdUBD FROM JUNE 3, 1987 IUiETItiG. Staff report by Hill Holley, Commmity Services Director. Mr. Holley introduced Harlin Glenn, a registered engineer, rho could talk about the lake. Mr. Glem described hie cork backgromd as cell ae hie personal backgrawd. Ne felt if something rae built right, it could not require a fence. Nr. Holley introduced Bob Heading, Architect, rho was to explain why lakes rare put in parks and vhy he felt a lake added to the beauty of a perk. Councilmmber Hrwn asked Mr. Heading the Hasher of lakes he hm designed and if he has seen other lakes like Dore that had sidwalke aromd rhm. Nr, Heading did not know the a~sber of lakes he hm deeignad, but crated he had seen theta before with eideralks like Rancho LLCemoaga's. Mr. Holley introduced Ron Page, President, Recreation Systems, Inc. Mr. Page related to the Cowcil rhy he felt lakes were important to a perk. He felt evergthing had been done to make Rancho Cucamonge's lake safe end that be felt a fence could create n haxazdoum situation. M. Mitt ~.. -~ -----~ _:...,,..,..~., sieve Leuuacu, Fark trol ecta Coordinator, t0 give a preseneation. Mr. Leonard stated that Council had three options to consider. They are; 1. Leave lake with no fencing. 2. Inetell a fence around the lake meeting miminum code requirements. 3. Pill the lake up end return Brea beck to open apace. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Jim Hail ey, Tne William Lyon Company, addressed City Council stating ha felt it could be better not to Gave a lake if it rae fenced. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, eddreeeed Comcil rel sting a personal experience to them. Fete Pitaeei, Chairmen, Perk b Recteetion Commission and Red Hill Tesk Force Member, stated he wee a father and felt the lake could be OR without e fence around it. city Council Minutaa July 1, 1987 page 17 Berry Kearny of Rancho Cacemmga rm concerned about no fencing around the lake berauae ehe felt children can get away from their parmte and get into the lake. She etnted ehe vae definitely in favor of a fence. Mike Vairin, Cabrillo Conatructim, liked the idea of a lake vit6 no force. Ren Douglas of Rmebo Cucmonge, Felt a fence would create a haz ardoue eiCUatien. Mayor Stout cl oaed the public bearing. Comcilmember Ring felt the lake needed fencing. Councilseaber Wright felt the City hee done every ihing that can be done to help prevent a problem with the older kids, tut for the toddl ere ehe felt a Eaves was needed becnuee of the ray Chia lake vae designed. Couvcilmaber Hrorn stated thst in all the pictures ehe had seen tonight, that not owe of them rae lilca Rmcho Cucamonga's lake. She stated ehe was uncomfortable with all of the ceaent around the lake. Couacilmember Buquet felt that by putting a force aromd the lake it would ba more of a detriment [hm atything el ae. He felt the only possibility would be to put the fence on the eztreme inside of the lake. llsyor Stout felt it rae inconaiateat with anything else the City bee ever dove. r..,..,..: i..,...x,._ o ~~-------- -= _- ~~ee==~=J l'u.i muy :.e a supervisor et the 18ke Bite would be the answer. She felt the fence could be done away with iE there vae eameone monitoring the lake. Comcilmember King did no[ underetend how the monitor could replace a fence. Comcilmember Wright suggested Chet the walkway be moved back and that more planting be install ed between the walkway and the perimeter of the lake. Council member King felt this idea would be more of a hazard beceuae of the visibility feet or. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright to continue the item to July 15. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. + ~ h k * Mayor Stout celled a recess et 10:13 p. m. The westing zecomened at 10:34 p. m. * * * * * w City Council Ninutea duly 1, 1987 Page SB 2. REVIEW OF CHNTRAL PARR PROPOSED MASTER PLAN, Meyoz Stout suggested this item be continued to September 2, 1987. MOTION: Hwed by Bxorn, seconded by Ring to continue this item to September 2, 1987. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. x f. * A ,t ~ G3. report by Russell Maguare, City Engzneer. "~~ arax~ MOTION: Mwed by Ring, seconded by Si out to epprwe Resolution No. 87-357. Motion carried unaninouely 5-0. RHSOLUTION N0. 87-357 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP RANCAO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A FIVH YEAR YRQTECT LIST FOR THS LOCAL STRHBTS AND ARTBRZALS SNARH OP THE LOCAL SALES TAR TRANSPORTATION FUND PURSI/ANT TO AB 1637 f * * ~ G4, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - ARCHIHALD Arm LOMITA - The City Comcil pill consider referring to the Planning Commission a poten[ial lend use change from the afire dnaionsN n.. . _ _ southreet corner of Archibald ~AVenue~Vand Lomita rCourt.7 LStaff repots by tOtto Krout il, Deputy City Pl ginner. Mr. Stroz ter addressed Council and eapreeeed hie vierpointe of this item end asked for their consideration. Meyar Stout said that while he roe on she Pl enning Commission that this parcel res discuaeed on a number of occasions end the Pl enning Commission decided Office Profeaeionel ee appropriate. He al eo explained why different comers in that particul er area re re designated es Office Professional and Commercial, which he felt roe more beneficial to the senior citizens if a couple of condi tione were met. He felt it rae unfair to refer this back to the Planning Commission ae a City Council generated plan amendment. He felt the Council should give the Planning Commission some direction in this matter, He recommended tF.at the Hopi icanr file far s general pl on amendment requesting that there be some type of mixed use, thereby some sort of a master plan, and chat it be contingent upon considering retail uses at that corner conditioned on the foll or ing: 1. T'her.e be a retention of a eignificent portion of cites for Office and Commerci el relflted uaee. City Council Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 19 2. That the Planning Commission epprwal of development plea promote a mired retail office concept eo that there would be same Type of development plan iwolved before theq decided what to do. 3. That a significant portion of the building area be designed as pure office - that ie no store fronts or parking in front of the boil dingo so the[ the whole thing couldn't be cosrerted to 1002 commercial is the future. 4. That the deeigo be compatible pith the edj scent senior housing project to the peat. 5. That [be project have same type of phasing to ensure chat timely development of the office services for the nearby residents. With these conditions he felt that a mired use at that site might be very viable end helpful to the senior citiz one. Councilmember Ring said 6e had ao problems with it ezcept for the design aspect. He felt it should go through the regal er design process. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded bq Buquet to refer to the Planning Coaimwion to consider the ebwe conditions ae policy coneidesation. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. • x tr yr G5. REVIBN OF PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE SCf1BDULE. Staff report by Bill Rolley, ....WW..... iy Sew •uee uiaeccor. Mr. Holley asked the Council iF they need further information on this or would they like him to bring back fl Resolution. MGTIGN: Moved by Stout, seconded by King to bring beck reeol ution et July 15, 1987 meeting, and at that time any more input could be made on this. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. + + ~ + ~ G6. STATUS REPORT ON CONCEPT OF RECYCLING PROGRAM (Requested by Wright). Staff report by Rabezt Rizzo, Assistant City Manager. Councilmember Wright did not feel we should wait for the Cnmty to do _~etF.i.^.g, t;;at this is vhy ova incorporated. fie Celt 'b e^ need to design sameth ing where a program is set to get things rolling eo people ere educated about recycling. founcilmember King felt Chia program should start with the refuse haul ere. city Council Minutes July 1, 1987 Page 20 Councilmember Buquet indicated he has talked with the refuse haulers end that they were willing to help, but that there would probably be en increase in coat, He also felt ii should be taken to the Advisory Commission to iweatigate. Councilmenber Brwn felt this could go on a survey and that since she is on the Solid Waste Commission that this would help. Mayor Stout liked the idea of a survey. Councilmember Wright felt that if it was referred to the Advisory Commission that something should also go into the Grapevine. Nr. Rizzo stated the Advisory Commission could report back to Council in epprozimetely 90 days. Ne also mentioned chat it could go in the Grapevine, but that he would develop a brochure on [hfs within the neat 30 to 60 days. • * e H. COUNCIL BUSINB35 H1. DISC039ION ON SELECTION PROCESS POR PUBLIC SAPSTY COMMISSION STATUS (Brwn/Wnght). CONTINUED PROM JUNE 17, 1957 MEETING. Councilmember Brwn indicated we are edvertisiag nw end that interviwe will be set for July 13 and 14. Recommendations will be made to the Council on July 15 with the Commieaiosera being effective July 17. Council member Wright said they would keep 4 of the 5 original members of the Public Safety Committee and recommend 3 new members. + + • • ~ H2. CONSIDERATION OP A STOP SIGN AT HILLSIDE AND SAPPHI RB (Wright). CONTINUED FROM JUNE 17, 1987 MEETING. Clyde A. Boyd, Chairman, Public Safety Committee, stated that this item did come up eta Public Safety Committee meeting and [fiat a atop sign would be installed with staff reporting back to the Committee on the crossing guard issue. Council member King indicated that sometime heck, fl atop sign was being i onside red at Cm r~etd and Jespe r. Mr, Boyd said [he Public Safety Committee would investigate this. Count it member Wright agreed with the Hil leide/Sapphire atop sign. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brwn to install the sign ai Hil leide and Sapphire. Motion carried 4-1 (Baguet voted no), City Council Mi¢utee .Iuly 1, 1987 Page 21 Councilember Bvquet stated he did not feel the Public Safety Comittae had the expertise to sake these recomeendstiona and that be felt the Traffic Coautittee rae supposed to do this, Mayor Stout stated that he did agree rith rhat Cauncilember Buquet rae saying, but that he felt reaponeible for the safety of the citize¢e of Rancho Cucaeonga and he vented thm to be able to give their input. * ~ • M H3. RECOM!ffiNDATIONS FOR SAFETY MEASURES ZN THH VICINITY OP WItB)RONS SCHOOL - Recosmendation to spprwe pl ecmeni of a four-ray atop at Victoria Pnrk Lade and Victoria Windrors Loop. CONTINUHD PROM dUN6 17, 1987 NESTING. Councilember Brorn stated she would like the Public Safety Couit tee [o report back to Council w this issue. a w+.k~ H4. DISCUSSION OP WORRSROP REGARDING VICTORIA LARBS (Scorn). Camcilembera Ring and Brorn to nerve on eubcooittee along with Fleming Coeniaeiw embers to discuss this issue. } e } • * + I_IDENTIPICATION OF ITffiiS POR NAT NESTING None submitted. • ~ ~ ~ ~ J. COMMUNICATIONS PROM TH6 PUBLIC No comments from [he public. a w~,e* R. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Bran to edj earn t¢ executive asseien at the request of the City Attorney. Meeting edj ourned at 11:43 p. m. Respectfully eubnit red, Debra Adams Deputy City Clerk Approved: August 5, 1987 CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ReRUler Meeting A. CALL 10 ORD6g A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, August 5, 1987, in the Lions Perk Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. the meeting vas called to order et 7:31 p. m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembere: Deborah N. Brown, CLarl ea J. 8uquet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present vere: Aaeietent City Manager, Robert Rizzo; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authel et; City Attorney, Jmes Madman; City Planner, Brad Buller: City Engineer, Ruaeell Maguire; Deputy City Planner, OLio Krout il; Resource Center Coordinator, Jerry Fhlvood; Sr. Administrative Asei etent. Mark Lorimer. Abaent vere: City Manager, Lauren M. Waaeetmen. R M D. AIGIWMf~IiS/RRESd1~X1T016 B2. Assistant City Meneger, Robert Rizzo requested the meeting edj ourn to an Pin re,:.... C......:..- .. . _ .'.i.-i:_c: I.ri.d:i~e i,cau:in:iV, e • ------•~ -- , .~Lia iiie Cuun cy ei aan He rnerdino. B3. Staff requested item number 22 of the Consent Calendar be removed to come back at a later date. • * • ~, + + C. CONSBNS CALgNOAR C1. Approval Co accept ae complete a 5-acre perk siee development known es Spruce Avenue Perk in the Terra Vista Planned Communi cy end authorize the Director of Community Services to file a notice of completion. RPSOLUTION N0. 87-389 A RESCLnTION OF THE CITY COL'YCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFIIRNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC It~ltOVEMENTS FDP. THE SPRUCE AVENGE PARK PROD ECf AND AUTHORIZ LNG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE WORK City Council Minutes August 5, 1967 Page 2 C2. Approval to accept a maintenance guarantee bond for the Hermosa Park end Hermosa and H®il ton Street Improvement Proj aces. Said bond ie to remain in effect for a period of o~ year from date of project acceptance hl' Cowcil, July 17, 1987. C3. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Honda, and Notice of Completion for Tract 12650-1 located east of Haven Avenue north of Hillside Road. Release: Faithful Performance Hond (Street) $571,000 Accept: Maintenance Gwrentee Bond (Street) $ 57,100 RESOLUTION N0. 87-390 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TRB CITY OP RANCHO CUGMONGA, GLIEtlRNIA, ACCEPTING INE PUBLIC IMPRWEMENTS FDR TRACE 12650-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION ftIR THE WORK C4. Release of Maintenance Hond for Tract 12065. Release: Maintenance Gwrentee Bond (Street) $64,200 C5. Approval of Parcel Map 10208 located south of Peron Boul everd between Remonn Avenue and Turner Avenue, aubm itted by Ceorge end Jean Deukmejian, Trustees Deulrmej ian Family Trwt. A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUGMONCA, GLIPORNIA, APPRWING PARCEL MAP N0. 10208 (TENTATIVE PARCEL tMP N0. 10206) C6. Approval to ezecu[e Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for CUP 85-26 located on the north aide of Bece Line Road, west of Victoria Park Lene, submitted by Victoria Self Storage, A General Partnership. R65QUTION N0. 87-392 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP 1HE CITY OF RANQIO CU GMONGA, GLIFDRNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AG RHEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SEQ)RITY FUR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-26 C7. Approval to execute Reel Property Improvement Contract end Lien Agreement for MDR 86-08 la Gated et 11155 Jersey Boulevard, submit tad by EYiedman Hamea. City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 67-393 A RPSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO Q1 GIMONGA, CAL IFDRNTA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IISROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEt~NT FOR FR D3DNAN HONES, FOR MDR 86-08 AND AUTNORIZ ING 1HE HAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAFffi C8. Approval to ezecute a Renew el Agreement (CO 87-116) with United Pacific Corporation of Santa Fe Springs for Eucalyptus Windrwe Maintenance and Emergency Tree Removal For Piecel Year 1987-88. C9. Approval to ezecute a Renwal Agreement (CO 87-117) with Southern California Landscape Maintenance for Lends cape Maintenance in Lendecepe Maintenance Dieirict e: 1 and 5, es yell es Sen Sernerdino County Flood Control Londe cape areas. C10. Approval to ezecute a Renew el Agreement (CO 87-117) with Southern California Lendecepe Nsintenance for Lendecepe Maintenance in Landscape Maintenance Districts 2, 3 end 4. Cil. Approval [o ezecute a Renewal Agreement (CO 87-108) for the City Nide Emergenty and Routine Equipment Pavement Aepair, shoal der Grading end Debris Remw al Annual Maintenance Contract with Laird Construction for Fiecel Year 1987/88. C12. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and Smprwement Security for Parcel Mep 10771 located on the south Bide of Wil eon Avenue, east or char ray wiaege, auomicced oy ~riga% ueveiopmenc, mcorporeced. RESOLUTION N0. 87-394 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIRIRNLI, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NUMBER 10771 (TENTATNE PARCEL MAP N0. 10771), IMPROVEI~NT AGREEIMNT, AND I MPROVeMENT SECURITY C13. Approval of Mep, ezecution of Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Parcel Mep 9504 located on the northeast corner of Heae Line Road and Haven Avenue submitted by Lw ie Development Company. RESOLUTION N0. 67-395 RESCLUT1017 GF Tk1E CITY d17CIL OF TIIE OI TY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA, CALIFbRNIA, APPROVING PAR(:RL IMP NO. 9504 (TENmemnre PARCEL MAP N0, 9504), IMPROVEtMNT AGREEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES C14. Approval eo execute Agreements Eor engineering Sety ices .or Map and P1 en Checking with C G engineering (CO 87-109): Derbieh, Cuerra end Associates (CO 87-110); end L.A, Weinacott and Associates (CO 87-111) for FT 1987-88. City Council Minu[ea August 5, 1987 Page 4 C15. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 87-112) with CIA Engineering to provide development inspection for FY 1987-88. C16. Apprwel to authorize an expenditure not to eaceed $7.000 From the Bridle Trail Retrofit Account 21-4647-8723 to Upgrade the Jaeger Drain South of Thoroughbred due to safety concerns to users of the Bridle Trail. C17. Apprwel to purchase ewe-way radios, installation, and maintenance from Comm Tech for FY 1987-88. C18. Approval to execute contract (CO 87-113) for the Turner Avenue Roadway and Storm Drain Improvement Project located on the east aide of Turner Avenue between 26th and the A.T. 6 S. F. Railroad crossing awarded to Stanleq P. Yel ich, Incorporated, for the amount of $885,165.90 to De f:mded periial ly directly from NUD funds and partially from Drainage Fhnde which will be reimbursed from RDA Bet-A-Side funds. C19. Apprwel to award and eze cute Agreement (CO 87-114) vi.th J. F. Dav ideon Associates, Incorporated, for plan checking of City-maintained landscape areas, for FY 1987-88. C20, Apprwel to release Agreement for Po etponement of CC6R'e for Tract 13060, located in the Victoria Planned Community. submitted by Rhoades/Snn Juan. RESOLUTION N0. 87-396 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANWO QI CAMDNGA. CALIR)RNIA. RQ.8A5ING AN AGREEFffiNT FOA _...T^C`.^ ........ ... ..u":.uviw Ur CCna' a tUR '1RAC1' 13U60 C21. Apprwel to execute a Reel Property Improvement Concrect and Lien Agreement, Improvement Agreemenc end Improvement Security For DR 86-38, located on the north aide of Jersey Boulw erd, easterly of Utica Avenue. subm fitted by Jersey Business Park Limited end Martin J. Jeeks, Incorporated, RESOLUTION NO, 87-397 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TRR CITY OP PANCHO CU CAMONGA, GIL IFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEtd:NT AGREEMENT AND I MPROVEt~NT SECURITY POR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 86-38 RESOLUTION NO. 87-398 A RCS ULU1'lON ny mpn CITY COUNCIL OF iFi'c CITY OF kANW0 QI CAFDNGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AREAL PROPERTY IMPROVEl~NT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEI~NT FROH JERSEY BUSINESS PARK LIMITED, FOR DR 86-38 AND AUTNORIZ ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME City Council Minut ee August 5. 1987 Page 5 C22. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 2 (CO 87-14) with GPS Consulting Civil Engineers for the additional work on Drainage Area VII Storm Drain Project to provide surveys, plena and estimates not included in the original scope of work. The amount of $11,938.00 will bring the contract total to 572,758.00. C23. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 3 (CO 86-58) with Liwille Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc. for the additional scope of work for Archibald Avenue Realignment Project to prw ids Traffic Striping and Signal Modification plane not included in the original scope of work, The amount not to ezceed $2,898.50 rill bring the contract total to 18.809.50. C24. Approval of Contract Change Order No, 5 with Associated Engineers for Etiwenda Storm Drain (CO 85-57), io prepare Aerial Topographic Survey and Mapping for Victoria Beain. The amount of $2,500.00 will bring the contract total to $121.329.00 to be funded from the Drainage Ind. C25. Approval to ezecute a Cooperative Agreement (CO 87-115) with the City of Ontario for the Construction and Mainteoence of Roadway Imprwesente, Railroad Croeaing Imprw®enta and Traffic Signal ai Grove Avenue and Eighth Street end the Atchison, Topeka end Sants Pe Railway Croeaing. The City's one-half share of approzimately $114,208.50 ie to be funded by Pe decal 203, Systems Development and the Article 8 funds. RESOLUTION N0. 87-399 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUGMDNGA, GLIEDRNIA, APPROVING AND HRECUTING THE WVL C[UfI1VC ILLa M6(IG I\~ oOlW eGp 1M1C V~1, Ve Nyi \{{V WIMPNIbM AND THE CITY OP ONTARIO^ A1R THE CONSTRU CfION AND MAINTENANCE OF ROADIJAY IMPROVEMENTS, RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVE1~NiS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAi. AT GROVE AVHNUE AND EIGHTH STREET AND THE ATCH ISON, 1OPERA AND SANTA PE RAILWAY CROSSING C26. Ap grovel of Haven Avenue Median Phase A to cell in all Liens, Bonds, end/or Development Agceemente for the funding of Haven Avenue Medi me. Also to estebl ieh policy pertaining to the raqui ring of future development to reimburse for median co net ruction by adding a reimbursement cl ease [o the Condi bone of Approval Eor undeveloped properties fronting Hwen Avenue. RESOLUTION N0. 87-400 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY OP RANCHO .^,J CtIl1^NCA, GLIFORNIA, PEP,TAIN^7G Tb PU :T1ItA FOP. THH HAVEN AVENUE t~DIAN ODNSTRUCDION C7.7. Approval to estebl ieh an enterprise fund for the Management of Computer Information Sy stem e. City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 Page 6 C28. Approval of Annual Statement of Investment Polity which recommends the adoption of the annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C29. Approval to purchece NBI Word Processing System for Adm iniatretive Services. C30. Approval to autF.orize the de et ruction of City records and documents which are no longer required ee provided under Govert®ent Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION N0. 87-401 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN470 CU G1lDNGA. Cld.IIORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCOI~NTS WHICH ARE NO LOhUER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GWSRNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 C31. Set public hearing for August 19, 1987 - Reprogramming of $53,735 in unspent Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds From the 1984-85 and 1985-86 program years to complete the North Twn Pheee IV Street Improvement Project - Review avail abil ity mf funds and approve reprogramming of funds to North Town Phase IV Street Improvement project. C32. Set public hearing for August 19. 1987 - Emiroraentel Aaae cement and Terra Viete Planned Community Amendment 87-02 - Western Properties/Lw is Homes - the request to emend Terra Viete Planned Comunity by eatabl iehing a Business Perk Overlay Zone for Areas designated ae OfEice Perk within the Planned Community boundary. C33. Set public hearing for August 19, 1987 - Em irormental Assessment end Tentative Tract 13541 - Allmark - Appeal of the Planning Commiseion'e decision apprw ing the development of a 12 lot subdiv ieion on 4.3 scree of land in the Lw Residential District (2-4 dwelling unite per acre), located north of Zed Hill County Club Drive at Sierra Vista - APN 207-411-30, 201-OBO-O1 end 48. The applicant has al eo filed a Tree Removal Permit. C34. Sec publ is hearing for Augue[ 19, 1987 - Ew iroimental Asee cement and Tentative Tract 13063 - Citation - Appeal of the Planning Commieaion'e deci eion apprw ing a total residential development of 74 single family lots on 32.6 scree of land in the Loa Residential District (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) within the Eeiw ends Specific Plan, located on the east aide of Seet Avenue et Ca tel pa - APN 227-071-07, 11 and 20. Aa societed with the proposal ie Tree Removal Permit 87-44 - A reque et to remove 270 Eucaly ptue Globul us (Blue Gum) trees. C35. Sei public hearing far August 19, 1907 -Foothill Houl everd Specific Plan - Rev iev of Planning Commission recommendation for adoption of a epecif is plan regulating development el ong the Foothill Boulevard corridor. City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 Page 7 C36. Set public hearing for August 19. 1987 - 1986-87 Grantee Performance Repor[ - Rev iev during Fiscal year 1986-87 end approval of aubmiseion to the U. S. Department of Housing 31, 1987. Community Development Block Cran[ of Block Grant Progr® Performance the Grantee Performance Report for and Urban Development by August C37. Sat public hearing for September 2, 1987 - M appeal of the Undergrounding Overhead lltil ity Condition required by the Planning Commission on July 8, 1987 for Development Review No. 87-20. C38. Set public hearing for September 2, 1987 - An Anne:etion of DR e6-38 and DR 86-26 located on the north aide of Jeraeq Boulevard, 350'+ eaexerly of Utica Avenue to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 ae Annezetion No. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 87-402 A RffiOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO W GMONGA, GLIPORNIA, OF PRffi.IMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT POR ANNEXATION N0. 1 TO STREET LL;ATING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 RESOLUTION N0. 87-403 A RffiOLllTION OP T71E CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANQi0 CUGMONGA, GLIPDRNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION 1O ORDER 9I6 ANNERATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICf N0. 6, AN ASSffiSMBNT DISTRICT; DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 2 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. LAi:uu Cniilw Ai:i Lwiii uw: n~i ue i9it anu O FFBRING A TIlffi •AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C39. Set public hearing for September 2, 1987 - An Annezetion of CUP 84-37 (PM 8901), Q1P 85-26, OR 85-37 (PM 9409). DR 86-38, DR 86-26 and PM 9504 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I ee Annexation No. 28. RESOLUTION NO. 87-404 A RffiOLllTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RAN410 CUGM7NGA, GLIPORNIA, OP PRHL IMINARY APPRWAL OP CITY EIJ.^INEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 28 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 87-405 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANa10 CU GMONGA, GLIEIIRNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER 1NE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCH DISTRICf N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRI Cf; DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 28 TO 51REET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIS .R SCf NO. I; PURSUANT TO 1HE LANDS GPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OPFER ING A TIME AND PLACE EDR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes August S, 1987 Page 8 C40. Set public hearing for September 2, 1987 - An Annezation of CUP 85-26 located on the north aide of Base Line Roed, Eest of Southern California Edison Corridor (Victoria) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 ae Annexation No. 5. RESOLUTION N0. 87-406 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGMONGA, CAL IFDRNLA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 5 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAN(7: OIS TRICE N0. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 87-407 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COllNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGMGNGA, CALIFORNIA, DB GLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER 1HE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING tMINTENANC6 DISTRICT N0. 3, AN ASSESSIffiNT DIS1RICf: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNHXATION N0. 5 1U STREET LIGHTING lNIN1ENAN(E DISTRICT NO. 3; PURSUANT TO TN6 LANDSGPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1472 AND OFFERING A TLMH AND PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO CA1. Set public hearing for September 2, 1987 - Ordering the Preparation of Reapportionment Report end Approval of Resolution Peeving on Reapportionment Report for D.R. 84-49 Within The Sizth Street Industrial Park Refunding District (82-1 R), Giving Prel iminery Approval. RESOLUTION NO. 87-406 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CII CAMUNGA, GLIBJRNIA, ORDERING THE PREPAMTION OP A REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND AFENDED ASSESS MNT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSESSMNT DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONt~NT FEES FOR D.R. 84-49 KITH IN THH SIATH STREET INDUSTRIAL PARK REMINDING DISTRICT (92-IR) MCTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar. minus item number 22. Motion carried unanimously S-0. • ~ + • ,t D. CONSEMf ORDINANCES The Ci r7 C. crk, ^ *.elet, read t*.e titles of all the nrdinanrea on the Gonae nt Calendar. DI. ADOPTION BY REFERENCE MODEL CVUES - ct'1'x ur nwnunu wuamuruw - Consideration of various codes ae publ iehed by the International Conference of Building Off icicle end/or the International Association o_ Plumbing and Mach anicel Off ici ale or the National Fire Protection Aeso ci etion. CONTINUED FROM JULY 15, 1987 METING. City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 Pegs 9 ORDINANCE N0. 311 (second reeding) AN ORDINANCE OP 111E CITY COUNCIL OF 111E CITY OF RANQ10 (U GMONGA, GLIFORNIA, RHPEAL ING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.08, 35.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24 AND 15.28 OP TITLH 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OP THE RANCHO (O GFbNGA MUNICIPAL CODE TTd THEIR ENTIRETY, AND SECTIONS 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, AND 10 OP THH SAN HHRNARDINO (%RiNT4 CODE ADOFDED 8Y ORDINANCE 17; AND ADOPTING BY RHPRReNCE THE "UNIFORM ADMZNISIRATNE CODE^, 1985 EDITION: THE "UNIFORM BUILDING fOD6^, 1985 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES 1N81CET0; THE ^ONIFORH BUII.DING (Y1DE STANDARDS^, 1985 EDITION/ 1HE "UNIFORM 1~QIANICAL CODE^, 1985 EDITZON INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES 1MHRETO: THH "UNIFORM PLUMBING (ODE", 1985 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPBNDI CeS: TMH "NATIONAL BtLELTRIGL CODE^, 1987 EDITION: THS "UNIFORM CODS FOR TH6 ABATEMLRIT OP DANGERWS BUILDINGS", 1985 ®ITION: THE ^UhZFORM N(RISING CODE^, 1985 EDITION: THE "UNIFORM BUILDING SEWRITY CODE^, 1985 HDITION: WITH CERTAIN A1@NDlENTS. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND HRCEPTIONS 10 SAID CODES. DY(I.UDING PENALTIES R85(1LllTI0N NO. 87-377 A Rffif&UTION OP THB CITY CWNCIL OP 1118 CITY OP RANCHO (OGMDNGA, GLIPORNIA, tMRING E1CPRffiS FINDINGS OP NRED FOR LOLL FDDI FI GTIONS 10 THS 51RTE BUILDING STANMRDS (ODE D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSHSSMRNT AND STIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMHNT 87-O1 - CITY ui iy e~aure r-io. wmuni [y Iraii e: Figure VS-19, Pedestrian Treile and Sidewal ka; end, Figure 5-35, 24th Street, east of Loop bF relocating the comunity trail to the south aide of 24th Street, east of the Loop Roe d, ORDINANCE NO. 319 (ee cond reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CIGMDNGA, GLIPORNSA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AI~NDMHNT 87-OS AFENDINC FIGURE 5-18, ^COMlU NITY TRAILS", FIGURE 5-19. ^PEDESTR DIN TRAILS AND SIDEWALffi", AND FIGURE 5-35, "24TH STREET, PAST OP LOOP" BY RELOGTING THE COMMUNITY E(1 UES TRIAN 11CAIL 10 1NE S(R1TH SIDE OP 24TH STREET, EAST OP TNB LOOP ROAD MOT10N: Mev ed try KSng, se co^.ded b~ Baguet to waive full reading of all the Ordinances and to edop[ Ordinance Noe. 311 end 319. Motion carried unanimously 5-O. City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 Page 10 • ~ ~ ~ ~ 6. ADVBRTIS® PUBLIC HEARINGS E1, GENEEAL PLAN AMENDMENT H6-02A - BARMARL4N - A request to amend the Land Use Map of [he General Plan from Low-Medico Density Residential (4-B dwelling units/acre) to Neighborhood Commercial for approzimately 5 acres of lend, located a[ the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiw ands Avenue - APN 227-111-24, 25, and 25. (Continued from Pebruary 4, 1987 meeting). ENVIROtR~NTAL ASSESSI~NT AND ETIWANDA SPECI PIC PLAN AMENDMENT 86-01 - BARNAKIAN - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific plan from CS (Community Service) end LM (Low-Medium Density Residential) to NC (Neighborhood Commertial) for 9.4 acres of land located at the nor Chweat corner of Baae Line Road and Etiw ands Avenue - APN 227-I11-10, 24, 25, end 26. (Continued from February 4, 1987 meeting). Staff report presented by Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Pl enne r. RESOLUTION N0. 87-033 A RESOLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO W GlI)NGA, GLIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL ftAN AIENDMENT NO. 86-02A, REQUESTING AN AMBNDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELHMENT OP THE RANCHO CU GMDiGA GENERAL PLAN EDR 9.4 ACRES OP LAND LOGTED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OR BASE LINE ROAD AND ETIWANM AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. 87-034 A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANQ10 (I]GMONGA, GLIFDANLI, DENYING ETIWAN114 SPECIFIC PLAN A[~NDMENT N0. 86-O1 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION P[tON COMMUNITY SERVICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FDR 9.4 ACRES OF LAND LOGTED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OP BASE LINE AND ETDAANOA Russell Mequi re, City Engineer, announced Chet Clyde Sweet, who prepared the original traffic repor e, was in the audience it Council wished to ask him airy questions. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Andy Batmaki en, developer of the Bite, seated at the tsar Council meeting s left for them to see there was ar.~ caj or t¢rar.t available far such a shopping center et that site. Mr. Bannakian proceeded to ezpl sin his development to Council. Nelson Wheel et of Col dwell Benke r, announced they did have a letter of interest. Rick Robinson, Vice President/Treeeut er of William Lyon Company, stated they did not want to see this request granted since i[ would be dart imentel to their propo eed center. City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 Page 11 John Potter, Nughes Investments of Newport Beach, stated they had engaged Shirley Lew ie who was doing a demogrephice study, although [hey had not received a copy of her report yet. He fur Cher stated Chat, et this point, they do not feel it appropriate to come forth with a letter of interest until they have had a chance to air dwn and study the demographic grw [li to the east. Jeri Kerney, 5594 Dogwood, reporting on behalf of the home wnere in Victoria. stated chat their position remained the same as it did vben pe titione were delivered to the City Council on Pebruery 4, 1987. Nel eon Wheeler reed the follw ing letter into the record, dated August S, 1987, to Mr. Andrew Batmekian, Barmekian Compa~ry, 9375 Archibald Avenue, Suite 101, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal iEornia 91730: Dear Mr. Betmekien: As you knw end ae we have di ecussed, Al be n eon's is progressively pursuing first class supermsrket locations in the Southern Cal ifornie marketplace, we currently have one score in Rancho Cucamonga. We have identified the Et iwanda area ae a potential area for a second store. From a spacing standpoint, the intersection of Base Line and Btiw ands xould appear to xork foi Al berteon'6. In addition, the intersection ie well located geographically to do a good job in serving the area wide shopping needs of this grw ing section of Rancho Cucamonga. If there were available en opportunity for Al berteon'e to be a pert of a strong neighborhood, our community size shopping center (10 to 18 acres) .~: _ -:.. .. ... o oe .~~. , uee~ u. ev ai un,.iug i~. eis such, •pl ease ,keep me appriaedyof your progtese. Yours very truly, Greg Bever, Real Estate Manager, Al bertson's, Inc. Clyde Sweet, Tr eneportation Division of Ludwig Engineering of Sen Bernardino, went over the traffic report vhich he had compl aced. There being no further public response, Mayor Stouc closed the public hearing. Councilman King expressed that he felt [here were two basic issues: I) traffic on Etiw soda, 2) two neighborhood centers in such close proximity. He did not feel it was an either/or ei [vation since no one would be bu it ding before the demo gr aphic's could support a shopping center. Hwever, some day chat area will be able [o support two neighborhood centers. Councilmen Buquet felt the issue was are we willing to accept that we ere going to have a problem with traffic ai Et iw ands end Base Line. Councilwomen Brwn felt the issue was whether we went to sec a precedent of violating the Etiwanda Specific Plan. She eta tad she would l.me th ie to go back to [he Planning Comm iseion for consideration of other al terns rives that would mitigate the traffic on Et iw ends Avenue end make it co nsi etent with the Etiw ands Specif is P1 en. City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 Page 12 Councilwoman Wright stated that a market commitment vas never the issue with her. She fell the issue sae the integrity of [he Etiwanda Specific Plan. She also concurred that if it was a traffic problem cn Et iwande Avenue, now is the time to do something about it. Councilman Buquei stated he wanted to put the commercial issue aside. We do have a treff is issue which needs to 6e addressed and felt that this vas the key issue, not the Etiwende Specific Plan. Mayor Stout felt that, from a land use situation, we have an approved site. Ii ie a matter of whether we went to add an additional site. He felt the traffic problem in that area ass a di seater end that none of the eliernativee presented were the types of al terns [iv es that this City could find acceptable. lDTION: Moved by Brwn [e look et the land uses up and down Etiwende Avenue ae they are today to see if they ere conai stem and whet impaction they would have on Etivenda Avenue. Motion failed for lack of a second, Councilmen Huquet and King both eteted that they did not feel Etivenda Avenue sae the problem. King stated that if we sere really concerned with that intersection, we needed to consider the areas up and down Et iwande Avenue, east end west on Bese Line and up end down Ea et Avenue. Councilwoman Brown asked wasn't this done when they adopted the Etiw ands Specific P1 en7 Councilmen King responded that it was done. Councilweman Brown asked why we would be entertaining increasing this to commercial if this ie the say it sae supposed to be? Councilman King responded that he personally felt the area could handle mro shopping districts. Hw ever, that was beside the point. He felt the motion was set up fot considering one street only; he felt that if Council wanted to conscientiously look at traffic, leis look at the whole area. Mayor Stout stated that is fine if ae wanted to take a year to do so. Hie suggestion was to look et the imps cts of the traffic on that specific intersection. Councilwoman Brwn eteted she would like to see some el ternatives looked a[ for tr en aition from [hat intersection north and south end what that would do. She felt an elterna tive of !+ tren ei [ion up Et iwande Avenue be looked at. This might have an impact on the zoning on both sides w1J.ch should be looked at. Buq because of the timing, she would like the subj act parcel looked at l iMlP dl ATPl V . MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Erwn to instruct the Traffic Engineers to examine the traffic impacts et [hat per[i cular intersect ion (Etiaanda Avenue end Base Line Road), work with the Planning Department on land use modif ice [ions necessary in the whole area which affect r~et particular interne c[ion; end ape cif ically, look et that one parcel on the corner be ce use of the immediacy of the dew elapment to [he west which would preclude any type of meeningf ul alternative being accepted in [he future. Motion carried 3-2 (N0: Bugve[ and King). Ci [y Co until Minutes August 5, 1987 Page 13 Councilmen King indicated that he had no objection et looking at the traffic circulation et [fiat intersection which is vital, but this is addressing the nor threat corner of Hase Line and Etiwanda Avenue. He personally did not believe it was approaching the system with fat meas. Councilwoman Wright stated that when she voted for the motion she understood ve were also looking et the thole area. Councilmen Buquet stated that the reference was epecif ical ly to the corner, and he obj stied to this. He felt if ve really wanted to seriously look at [he problem, then we needed to look et that intersection and everything that radi arse out from that point ae to traffic impact. Mayor Stout end Councilwoman Hrwn stated that is whet the motion included. Councilman King stated the motion el so included looking more specifically at one particul at parcel. Mayor Stout responded that vas because the Traffic Engineer informed Council Lhat if they did not do airy thing, we will have no impact whatsoever. There is a po aeibil ity that we might 6e able to reduce the traffic impact while there ie an opportunity. •waw~~ Mayor Stout called a recess e[ 8:45 p. m. The meeting recorrvened at 9:00 p. m. with all m®bers of the Council present. Rl.~ir~* • : + w w E2. ADOPTION BY REFERENCE PORTIONS OP THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ENVIRON!ffiNTAL ricALui wirc - wuaiuc,riim, ui vcc Luue cccLiwe ui Div ieiuu 3, ii cis iii ei ci,e Sen Bernardino County Uniform Em ironmental Heel th Code. StafF report by Mark Lorimer, Sr. Adm ini stretive As ai at ant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing, there being no response, the public hearing vas closed. City Clerk Au[hel et read the title of Ordinance No. 317. ORDINANfI? NO. 317 (fire[ reeding) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANQ70 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Al~NDING THE RANCHO CU CAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW CHAPTER 8.20 TO TITLE 8 THEREOF AND ADOPTING, HY REFERENCE. ORDINANCE NO. 31C; CP THE CCU;JTY CP CAH EERNARDINC A ~;JDZ!JG DI'7IS IONS 1 THROUGH 6 OP TITLE 3 AND RESTATING VAR IOllS REGULATORY PROVISIONS OP THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OP ENV IRONlENTAL HEALTH SERV ICEH ODVERING: FOOD, MIR TES, WATER, TOXI CS, WASTES, VECTORS, HOUSING, RECREATION, AND OTHER SUCH ENV DlONI~@NTAL HEALTH REGULATORY SUBJECTS, WITH CERTAIN AMRND.~,ENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS, INCLUDII~ LEES AND PENALTIES City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 Page 14 MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Brown to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 317 and set second reading fot August 19. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. * * * * * (* * Council combined items E3 end E4 * *) E3 asses®ente at the close of [he public hearing; and E4. CONFIRMING AMENDED - stets amended Li~vu aiainu roan rtcru nuara. ura•aa~i \n L-1N - bL arL recommences rnac wuncu approve the resolution confirming [he amended assessments et the close of the public heating. Staff report on the above [wo items by Jerry NStlwood, Resource Center Coordinator. Mayor Stoui opened the meeting for public hearing, there being no response, [he public hearing was cl Dee d. RESOLUTION N0. 87-409 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM)NGA, CAL IFDRNIA. CONFIRMING AI~NDED ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82-1R F9R PARCEL MAP 10223 AND YARCEL MAP 9508 RnS ULU 1'1VN NU. b/-41U A RES OLllTION OF THE CITY COll NCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CU GAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING AI~NDED ASS PSSI~NTS IN ASSESSFII?NT DISTRICT 82-1R FOR PARCEL MAP 96%0 MOTION: Moved by Buq ue t, seconded by King to approve Re eolueion Nos. 87-409 and 87-410. Fb tion carried unanimously 5-0. * * * * (* * Council combined items RS end E6 * *) ES E6 r repo Mayor Stout opened the meeting for publ is hearing, there being no reapo nse, the public hearing was clo ae d. City Council Ninutea August 5, 1987 Page 15 RESOLUTION NO. 87-411 A ABSOLUTION OF TlIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANWO (IIGMDNGA, GLIPDRNLI, ORDERING 1HH WORK IN (UNNELTION WPlli ANNBRATION NO. 36 TO LANDSGPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE PINAL HNG INEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 10349 ABSOLUTION NO. 87-v12 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1H8 CITY OP RANCHO CUGlONGA, CAL 11NkNIA, ORDERING 1NH WORK IN (XINNECTION WITH ANNESATION N0. 26 TO STRHET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING 1R8 FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACE N0. 10349 RESOLUTION N0. 87-413 A RESOLUTION OF 1E6 CITY CWNCIL OP THH CITY OF RANCHO [IIGMONGA, GLIPORNIA, ORDHRING 1NH WORK IN (XINNECTION WITH ANNeRATION N0. 20 TO STR86T LIGHTING MHItiTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING 111H FINAL SNG INBER'S REPORT FOR TRACE N0. 10349 SDTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution Noe. 67-411, 87-412 and 87-413. Motion carried unanimously 5-O. NO ITEMS SUBMITTED ND ITEMS SUBMITTED «+ ~ it ~ P. POBLIC HEARIICS G. CITY lNNSGER'S SIMPP REPORTS R ~ # * ~ e. IpNNCn HaBIISBH NO ITEMS SUBMITTED City Council Minutes August 5, 1987 page 16 • : * + * tr I. IDENTIiICASION OY I1WQT POR NHZ'l M~'II11G Il. Council requested the establ iehment of [he concept of a goals workshop end some po aeible dates be brought back for the nezt meeting. I2. Council eetabl iebed August 31. 1987 et 6:00 p. m.. for a cl Deed session with the City Manager to disease personnel matters, to meet at City Nall, 9230 Bees Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~ w • ~ J. CglOIQG7IOllg PBOM ffi POgLIC Jl. Andy Holm, 6022 Rluemen, addressed Council espreeeing same concerns about a neighbor at 6006 Klu®an, who had epprozimately 27 disabled eutomohil ea in hie becky ord. gteted Chet he had contacted Code Enforcement but there seemed to be very little tbet could be done about it. Mayor Stout requested the item come beck et the next meeting for discuecion by the City Council. x x ~ ~ ~ ~ [. A-,idOHMNmR MOTION: Moved 6q King, seconded by guquet to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting edj Darned at 9:25 p. m. Respectfully autmitted, Beverly A. Authel et City Clerk ^o• ~'ea~ a -.oU CWi fW`IV !•w ~T -•Smum rO~ys?PNP JINN .- ym.(~ n~ p m 7v fn nnnnMHn(-nnnmmba0/.D~OnDD mpOC2 2 n AS L] Y SSn+rrn~rr('iA21n ~nTm2 n23"r ~ OSaAbu u.• Nm~mrJnA)ma~~ mAAmY t S ~S ~ ca crr mD>xr mn~^r~~ma >cc..s A c° Er 2 mim y~..u c. cm ..z..m noun r<~ m . r 2 Z m r2~002my 2bxm n2 `~ n AZ Z •^22~nn riZ c.c-.~2Pxsoaa s~'~o.c. n n mzm °n~Dnzzc mbvr rt~ca~ xi coo]' o o >xzc n .<.i `mmc pri nP.»~ _ of I ~inAr z v ~^ s^~c..-c - s •~i n OG a v ^'nnN ~n C~~n m00.+ » > Z I C ~ T ~ ? •n ~. > ~^an Z ( Z . CT mgr •] r I ]Ax2 zm. z~~~ c c r~ . rt Sru Vir v. OFn~f ~' 26'C FAO Z n ( n l,n ~`Pi m(bjy mn9 Z 1 ~t V~AOT i•-r ~ S ('rrDT 20r D< ZZROn .ryT (•Cim9 ~( (` ~^09m./. (`rm2•T Vim Aif X R 7 mf•A }D nL~rStyAO~nZm~n r ~.mF D b~f] l`An(°Onn -•C•O U<w Z n n r ~i ~. ~ IA mG VST n.'CnA NIl2 Onm un I m2m~ oYRZ7 On ' ~S f Rb •+C ( p f ~ m' <or y cn x, -. ~s n2 rf~3SA Drtir -[ r I ] ~ _ ~ I Z ~n-~ I S 1•C VS ~TS S ~Sr+2~ S ~ < Pm n s z rs s n _ ~ z i r 3 C ~ 2 r [f f NrOSm~p n~.y„rCSa-IP V]. •.i~r S ~. P n O <> n ~ m, n r ~,~ fnt~~rC`n°': l`~'V t•CC<nr•Vn n.nt v~C -~ .f t ~~U f 1 P wf" «P Ov APP Od-~-~~nNmTUr W.-O~rtmNln P mONNONd~O`-VPP wrO~Pw +T-IN gvWdwm+Tyd dO~N~nmv Ans>++ti>ANmDOO>ZmN22 >OOOL+T mTmmm000D0 nnnn 2~202C~Ir ZpNr~3S~(+~ZO>ZpSnrONNny3mKf~rO'InCV n FmF< mm rY ) rmm Y2m30Nr2-+(11n> D>rK Tt2~.n2r 4+p> O>O r233m SC=Ir2- mOZ SOyZT9m) T~my CT OF r mp O)-1 TCprGtpmNCZZS N222T~.r s 3symAN~FmmN<m0 p~-.aT yG 4+C+4+O2 r DDr p>n.•aT tnC >ZTM1•w Zn-y wn0~>p<p ~p uTmVyr.20•+Nm pn1 r+0 rOF ~mn-rZr T2D npS9 nfOn ZSO « rZ<f+ZmNyO CnTT Ypmr2mNYnf AVO-O AYmL~~ mC 3F)pDyyTO G+ >1 A-~Ar tiA Srrm 2N f v. pmti2 F.lr pmTC NZf21 rS-.N NZ 2rm 23Z Nn•r NSm SOD O r nC+mO ZC pA 222 nT 02 Vf1 ~+2m mZy) Z-1 rG+,n OVO ^`C•C V •' N • An f •• - yr A m y 2 m9r3aNrynmAO9rTrti NP~mT nw3T2 Sl.ir nrnlZW~ iNrA+O Nr~TYOrO~~YTTG Zp nOppA~•l rOA2/+T nS ~<zap-i-r.•.- m2 TTV ~z~ +. v~..r~"nnrra NATAm )DCn-1mm pnZA z2 >v~iv x.~mN. oTCy°n~°N~a+o n.T. T°..1.>0 ~nzonr om>~"'+., n o+ moor Npmcr o-.nvN ..ncpv>apm i~Nr pm rTO T...ynFSi,~imm".z..r. i~ F~„ ..m irPmmN o«~ooo~~ r z o an ~. zTwr~rmwnx> oz znp~mmsvmmm ooze onmvnTmc> mp.~.~=~n -~<m iiWnTNi .noa mamToNiai ^'SVV. Szc~~T.-.r r, >~<F + ~svc c'RzY mz~mo:N c mn rm ~oDr ~l~a >rp - x..<~.. n" No voi )p zaW >sz nmiz.- K zv mT ~ vNN~ OOTrr'IS-~ FSrNmm OrD~N= -Si0 f n m O m 9nrm f1D ~<("~ O Cm mn 3nTT0 T mJ C r -- cxf v`p ozvc .• rc zrmi rmv °n in io :~~zsv r~z ir> .- mcY ma v.. y Dp Ppr2 •pr A~ nL+»pn n 6A CAAAm )2r ~vz~ n~ r= ~i i<- .. N D. -. ~,. rV N N r z ,° n N. .. N ~,. N N .,, N N r~N :=nrnooc :w~.". {.om~TP:~,N crmNm+N.:~..N~oso~.~mv. ~,N.r..c da-.P +a: ~nP ..-d.c U..r i<... co.r., Iw.,~i+P~ aoN~- warnm -iommcm+ rv nri rr+i,cr mU-.r NNN:NJOrc,nNPVdd w.-m ~aPrmoan, ,.,u~ r i x z 1 r. a.-IPm-~w wwwPaw -I ~.- we -~oN +Nm N..IN~ d a°om.im~°.~~~`.~~ml.'~o aNNNP'N ~oa do °nm°~~vmam~c°u~NUW.°.~m i i I 1 K N CC'~~IrNNNNNNNN~-NNNAAppOO9yT9VTOTD032322322 Im P -I~ST>KO~OOT~n»»I.i •+T>CpOr uu »>SSUUTOO2rr~ 1 r O%ANC CCy.a r_mD22mNOZwC2>rONNnnITFX2DO>mL 1 26ntirurr<N > nn0>Z>in un n O NTN > 1 uZ9nTm2222nr NSOmA SSFm 2Nm>D'n 'n Y>mZ%mpn .n rONOr2mmmTnOn OnTNf n6 ZOUNmrA OI Z K O~ NAaDammON mpr>r nrrZr >Ir')f1~Nrmum ~ 22223 2nun202rOAUNn pn9 rn20nmxl>' VV >L9I20 m rm>r n 290CH2rn2D2m> O Or32~nOnnnnNAYAn nmA9>rrfpm r ACYr>u•NAUrA ~ pm)nnr» » rY20•ADm>SNT O$CnOrnT_Z Cn002 1 _ um2 r•CrrrrT2Km O r ON OmK>NONOTZ a2 1 C -In run A~4 m rOTTOn `-ti~ir•S-~ ynnN C ryrn0 > N> rDODOD 2 A AALZ Arp>rn D Zrm 2 A nSn KNpApA n tuAr 2 YnFC> NS C 9 G+O YNT 3223 nrm 3 •9 20m) nrC E n mC2p p T mA2 • A Y»> N a N Z A A<K ~n o? car D Nv i r o 2 OnTTmT OC A C nr C Sn n C•T000 ZA N O T n > T T 2 1 O N OOCO Or K 1 2 2222 ~ n 1 ssas ;; t .... n. i 1 rcrwww c..nnrmooNVN2snpnNppT<<Nm2oo Nmcmma I ~DNNAmN+++2N2mTrN1TOx09NUti~m2pm)n~OmNDOrZ ; D<F C~rO u Or>F m~pi rpuuDn mppTUU Ou iuTr> mAAS-1>n nrr3TOOr NI•m K. i009r9> r>ON -~ nrrSN-IOAGOrym cnP uOK C> AnrTnC r1YA OC<OaA Cmm >nYZpOOKrNtCUmOwnNy Tm uCpmx OK~NN OWN nmN rZ 2yy nNS A 1 ymomYOnu<~~TxovmiTTTw~co mlm-.T.i ioinmmNNm n.Y+~i im ro r x rr o o.. Narronrx„rNp.. c ao n Ir OnK xm>NmnzrmnrrnrrNrmn 2 m>nzn I b' <mrmnmyomYNZmr moyoo r-Im zD Am I a mn am N:i<m9DNrn onynzmimn m'~ .S.a N~~msa i m >o>oD:r m~zmosN iNnTo N r D O mS:w ]IIOSOCrZ~ln rDmrJirC26m 02N=~• TO p tim ~rrNmOOAON r2 u N z oD -~ iron. may ~Nnmr NTmm +~ i r r N n. r~ mornT r y i~mDAs ~n 9 N~ p~N nnrCr9 » r01 iOp O 1 n > nl•+mm~ OTr '3Nnnm xhTnl•'. F n20 hNnn s Nc ns m O n C% NCr C_ A_rr Ci _yTr OAT O O N Ytr 2 Zm O mp I P m ApaaA p2 rapA •T•A AAU Jrm prpm 1 A 2 T 1•~ S C Pruu nn Z un 1 K n rrrr-• Zr wn r-• r C u -Im 1 N~2..~N~2, 2 H~~ v~ M~ i Hi1N ° i o n ...... .. ...... .......... .. .... ...... ...... ........ .... .... .... ..- .-.-.- .-.-...•.. 1 x n i>2 i ~mm0m~tiu PRPPOO~PpP IA O •nl.wvrOam-IP IT i.wN•-OdmtiPPdw N•. OdP~P N1.w N••Oam-LPN 1 A 3 n i > ix i ~ Is omN P-O O I . m oPw m~i m,'-N:~Wmsu~~NrcmoN ~~m,`o T <•mac I> Rio +N•m iowNOOP~KCwa:d~e w.-a onNd no~n+ ..~ . mo.o~+ ~.c ~. .+~o.n ooc m-ir.-a.-n ~~a.moP. r,wor~=Nmmv~m ~~.wn v~i~°o .o v~. °oocmormoon 3 c ~., s ..o of+r., -~-~ ma -.> -1 wii~ mo ~..z. r az.- -~ni i ozi r> -. .,vvf ~ ai az~* +~ mF( 1i2a0 y Ay mry~n~ i a zznn >z ~.monm N o~~~ <n z on ' s . nr: an ~ c v i w i sr<ou.r ..cc ~ aim ~o . z T >P y T CX TCw f11~ ~ ~Sm t^11'.nvf~r C 1 ~ZS r33 G 9 v .^ v N r, ~ 1; 3 rc~ ~o s ° ~r-.a ~~ z a ~, :~~ r ~o ~~ .r~,rn u oP P-~i a -.mPWVV Vr`.trtiNWO~.voNa.-aw .- -~~*~,m -~"' u P.-e am..a-.o.-mmWm-~w t., mt., ,,~:PO .°a n~°...i i~o N °o a ~ i t a nnn(1nnnCtZnpmmmwwiwl>D»DY Yrm~v Clr in 3 Im y CVVyZinm»C~+r~m>)>•C~nr nn viS lrnpttY 1 > Y 3 CTIOpr m~nmymr'e'~w•e .1m3tT ZO p.n2iND 2 O OZ< Gp{T S Ooi.+ rS p-tD R a xcc t'~m m wo< ro nsirna mN<m r w i Om2pim miV°L VrZw-fan C° V ° m > YAYy~ .,S ~FCpCm.~ir v.-.O~Fea 22~= m20 .Zy Z r ~ SOCZ-1 mc0_ti NT}m ZOOS r ° m m2 nZD Y>~piZ u C~101Y'Z mA O C _ ~° rCC YYn lrm;tn A~mV<~' Lipm'' yC Z ti ~ A m2 T ft pn `n2 ]1 C T n nm r m03 HT i+ ~ n m Am ° ~ 9 • 2 y NN9n m p Z Z m 2 m) N ~ ~Z °.Su ~nlC p m C > DS m f F• r ~C r i ~n °S p 1 n z r ~ c .~ 03 z ~c »pOFf ;.63 Upr<nv avp< ae~^-~O m~nN m imCr-gym ~OC> mC°TmT> mCCaTmmm ~n°o sr~T .. rs~rerr 2 mnxma a3DTmyT .- n n norZSSr><A mD602°m ('aLrw20 C:ay•• Y p m°S FO'r12n ~+ C ~-r~nDF n^°C S nn• CZYZ m TmC.D~-nS SmYa °V~ r°Orr m m YzeOZ°r T~ rOmY.G V~ YmC VT nmwrSi~.r < p pm.~m (.1 -tpF nnm-i 2ti n r~ V>mmC Yew • m O 2 o° ~099~---e~c ~`oc~°cr e~..eoroa a. °o'r"m.~. v m nY~r> .. "Ton.. ° ~ . n Y~..;r °az9o.~>..I nnr m ~FO~ z c i s ann z-.~~mv>~i s--.p ~s mpTrN <o>>> m °o~T .c > n o e~N e> ~<~ °riTao ea pmcemop y j y naY mraz~,m mcza .~. z> cz~ _ S>G~p-~mmC >S m° O -~2~ D=yN ~nyG 9> O yF prn I mnmy Z` m° m n2 Y mi+OZ°S m m mlo wjm I apF~Oyr.i NFOSN~nt•~> C ST n Fn e `r° °n: ~xCS~ ~iC D v. UZSP ~ ~ SS _ r~O2T fN~CNSSF m p1ti~ T O< mn-. -.mmm m m a ~n^F ~STCmF r y Yi r TF n S r2 2 C m.0 ~ 1~ J ~ 1S v .n r v r f/ m'u' ,r ° TT mmm ~ ~ ~ f Ii ~R?CT^ mR mC^ RVRPV ~> P~.wiv.~ndR~Tt~nwr.,..mdrr~n~P~rw h.-C dlai~dPm~ddD >p rnr ri 2 S wpr (~ m •+OR(J^~ 4,°F NORNU~n T r :o sti~~NOr N<. :p ~~. <~oor rmu°om o 0 0 0 r r NN ~ NNOTw m WT lDm .+m+wP -•rPm?wwWdmOVdyNmml.wru }v OPdmgP waT: JwmWwm ~' Sdw+.•d OmdNON~l an ;y d F Ft F•~l •~.+ TxOaOrOmnTSTi•T mmTmm000303nnn rF m .>Om9Z2nO.a>OSDm O>= m %rc • >C CC > ^> m o mNN T z y.nn -armrP+i rsm<mizmmmo+yN n< m m~<. so rmnrzxr~r•-z• r>T i • N iz D Zi ~i znnD D•-comma-+mmmx~T rro yK mN T D O >D<Ka O Z~)>mmirauD+ nr)nDm CWOnia=j mrS2 + m D 9)N<MS 2nT>m ni ~CrmZCnv+OP a i m ~ o++n znmrzz..» ,+o m aomr •. ~.+ cocsrz r+ cz >m~ arTn~s ~~m 1 -•m ~oo.~x TDO....mF m+a.mm N i ~ .°. N +NrzmTn Nxr Fnm r zrrT cmmzz I ., nxm i > m s Tm•ncm a z~rnnn a rYO - •m or Sc, r-• x s>yr v•-.rrDm iY c+ c x > zxa+.+•-TO+ ITT o Dom nyi m CD~~n Z O O >OZ T Dm m O a 2m 0 m O n c m : rn D n~m a n ~+ T9 c+D iz Nz. x'~ z n rT-n i I z r no N c = m m 006C FZOO '~~ K ; N } ( +n~ m S ti N f N +n P ~ ' Am N S Z M r ~n G 4 m m n+n OO 1 rta in~+n m+nT ~`+nmrV~~xmS mpDi'yN +~~o'FOOSrlCmcCm m nTTmm y. .aCT 10>D9DS>m"P+n r G~>~rmmTmOrr r+nr r f`rmr rtr x~]'C ~mr m~•~ _ ~•-r -•r-+ i Pr. S Z r oi •-~ N - i +nm zrt . izm Dz.z ,.. ovz c » ir~m r•zx nmi i>socav+m srrNmmo>ormi s s n r i s iN .vo z imnmmm inKK zr zx rt+no . m m<a.+ nnm r Djr 3m~NC=Tr92 n~'?S+TNNZ z v»zrrmiirDZNr ...• zrr ~m ~ i i i Im ~. ~n ,+z zz ~xaTxmmD rr .~ :iNS zs+N nmyTZi+nDD i r cmoa^cr u mczD ~-.D m~ nDax av n fN x ~n anTmma9SmD9 a at r Om T O O +~ I D Z m ZDmy>R -~».D N> d00 rm 1 N FO> D 2A2 v.F>naDmmZr+nr nrm,2 m'nTOOmOSmFOti OA n'n O.nD m m O j D Y m 2 T i.T a r• -+m TiT P+Oi+C m.T ~2 mmZ r+ +'2 .~ r m D T 1 • C mm 0 r• ~~ P 1>am +na m (t A F K C ~•D +na +nnOm y+nO m1 •r-~n<S N F r+Z m .r0 ? n n f.A npf+l'~ + r n TI'~9 o T 1 `r: ~i ~ v~ D s can ~ o ~F mcrr mmsnm T +z++ .-r° .- is • `te i a Dec d sD>as F D mF ..x c~. ~ s ns rm m ~' r i r~ D n ~ 1 to T C 3 . r TST C 2 • +n r •n v. •n m ~. an ~~ V _ m nP P pPC? CPrt m ~ 'Jrt PPPPmPC^P IT T S W ' P ~ +i d?-i -iNP.n OWN ~OJ`N'-+RV~.~.v•.ONW-+PV'f a.~+a~r l~.nm-+P •n .•.w~r Z > 1} .-rt~.a noro ~ ..N m V n v P <ia.~ ~ ' 4 + r oos:.a °ia~i. ~l.,~~i.+'a a $' '~` m ia i r rt . +n ~~ roc non. mm.n~co. o.r + .,u~ v m ~i•~:~P?. m .. n:r + W niP: w~ocoNm..~ ~aww w:nm mmP.o a.<P mo•-r•--wtimP ~..o -~...,.~.-Na°oWw°Ni~mi.,-ImwmPO.-mm.-.o a.•m noooam„wor.~-1 NN xs~a~n ~nN°NpppmanA~~D+~Tmv~aPpzzz zzx°sxxx ai Y• omm>m r> a >• noopomo Y..» y yrAFrmP>ZmhmmrSYTZ2~hmC-~Y Xn3mAAAArNmAnpm xm<i•~Dr°o mmr,n nm AfpiSmA°mAZ2rrmSiSSrm OxF -~nAmp ONnxm oCO TZ .n T LL212 ZA>n SF m ~+DDNO 1 P~ 2mf•T000OnfC SSnm 220<ymin 2D 2r»OSmyY[G~ CKrCCm °AOCOO OOr p• _ < viZ xmmf D'1m r9rOYA 0°CO 2ASmyT nf=v m F. f1>r+n pm~D V~N02'TrtiZn ZApLpa CmGI»~ n3~ OArA aCm N2xOZA>N>AmmnAOrnNa~im Ir m0<VV9 ~ mf.Om TTZ^m9F mmR, CD2Ch Cn SAAAA r Nmn < o>m a20~n2 f<rA p~ 2'v0000 c < > A= p0 < a f9a-•nm CSDmZ> R TN C~mmC N2a-1 Z 3r ~nAZt~ r~ f r 1~>Y y Y pr V A2r mOm Nf n r___S p vrSZ • <s c Tn~~~n i <px >:' v er ~V fc. 22 m ~ 2 «<i nnn n Nd3s<nR n. SCPRFaDOfCV<N3mmSmOnmTf V2TS~+NmD Rf 23mmtrm~mfC01~ZNm>rAFSTSaf 22_2nCRDCf 3EST CYmCnm~yrmirma2f F> OZNC AH> v°iZ V~u>mm hn <nm mn°Hm vim m~3~',~F~ NNAnrDNC2ir<iTf FnrNm~Cm~ nT mND~ Yn mSr 2'(F T `•Pmvm _OmYD TZ T ~Z 2. CmP> ~pAmmmmy ~ rA ~AC~mAT p> ~^> N p9~> fA O mr py ar mV Zni AnZ °m Taman>~v° m Nn._+°>S _ L^ Pr-~a '~i~« ~<mz c_N n,r maz_'~ °n° ...N ~F .<. R Om2(•C v.Sy.pDr±mO ° F< Z~ m rD TnA~ CT E:mC Nar 2i<YN nyNPrm n0 m Or f~~' a~ p~m2 A• m yAO m /; h ~ C nC~ pOWOVr r L N s m3 if T Cy> D r mxN cm r>mi Sr mxiW m ~xxmm3T siimi ApS D TARP OAaAanA n.TDp2 z m n vin v` Tu, NUi =. ,3,. P Nv. v.M V~v3• v~v v`. /~ a im I i p 1 y 2 ~S Im 1f ~A c t mRn RCR^ I.T Rrn~V°wr~.i rfC`.<(i inJ m~nY wn.~OSm~PVfwNmCGmr V+~.n ^P^ O rOtm 1 C 1> w { rR U-~ vr. ~Yn u•JR NPR _i1.S~ ~nUr S O-r CVCC ROnw ~n N01CCN nm C-l .I~f`VCO~OW Unit ~~C`CV C.•^C r: C.mRC~~OmN OC V. .~Yn Baca n•~-{a min y-y.o~--i~mv~~w~imw- a •-waamwa•.a.-m•-w~a:moao{maa i s° i< a ~m , ~~mcrz.. i.<.i.ny ~~: icic: vaoooo °.° aGr>NZyrmrmAmx s.N.amcc cc Tvororyn<nAm xy rnyyyy i Gx2rmom oznymNrm zrxxxx i . z -cy osrmmm ~ oinnc rr iscoz n r>AAA y o c-f No xzn °o rzzzz n AZn~TAC OCy A2 I v 2TAVT 2 >9 r`Onnn ~ r ClOm<Cr ~•Z7 O= °f m~rr OCZrN>_ yn yON~my A>Om 2u mmyr r~• > m rn,Tr r° mrmN ny 3trn00 A < i°Cm°i tzmr r... rYn:zi i ~ i N Di i m nz oN mniii N nG ox <.. mA Ns iN ci zy c• nczN i Cv yA 2~+ r Nn m< Onn 1 ..n not 9 • C C~ (r r Y Z v Z 1 <n3G~ -•<v ofu vSS NCP~n .m.i<>cysAO d.z~m<>oa- Z 2AtiuNGrAmOJDCOTrvATf-rp n CC'F CC;>ry • ZTOCO2~•r-r-ru Tm(~>A .+vZm Cr m2m2 AZ> n>n>m <CV NCIOyy i-> Ni ;tvmN zz•o•r+i ~~moT xzvNmo<>< -.zm naTmm or D 2CINA4ti<rmS23aCA~mC~ Ir rC3 NOmr n2dG~ In nZm SrP G10 >vm° rOrmT IS >GZ nyyz•- mzANmomT rrd COT m~;m y2 f~ v'C Vi XP >Dr (~C 3'•-•C n % ~+ ~ C SC ym0 f mT nr Z yTN Cf` In y6 yyf+a CNN n NCp Gc'• ~ C.- ~Pr ~ 2T SSaA m2 m ;PS•Pw~~_ r AA AA~> yA JA m A ; n mmi i sm. s n ~ ~t x. .x > c a`' n •~ONCn rv•P (` m -IP •~ VryA{nPVM1'nv { 10^nr wC-Iw NrVm Nrt. C{C n~.{wCOf'•'{[w S COPY . _ .w.~..w.. ~. I. w.r r.<A. u... TAb Nw"rN aw aMHw. aN. all diNllgfEDEE 101 /ilCO11011C fEV~Nf ALDNpIfI 1. IYIF(51 OE uCWSry51 NlF NO. ~- ia Oapl.all M AAdHY< Mwafa CAHAVL S a E C I .~ ~•.. AE[EIII NO. av r a, a I. YSEIf :...w...waw....m.: _....:. ".,~.. G[ IIIUL CODE i ~ I r~tl~ M ~ IwN S. NMLFL51 OE Al11KAM(S) Tap h,ril . .,. wl .:o , xm.y . ARAM radar Sac tdDY ~ ~~ (,;.,,:,-° EEwli.a wH: 9:~ ]. TTI[(5) Of TEAEaSACTlOld151 rff IIC. Tv1E z rst.. 111_1, 5;1 f e. 4 Nana M Ernlna<L S. lwallon d M:HH-Nw::bw and brwL CiN a:d rrr Ced. Canuv rc Yv cswVn a 91 )vl n iN<nJp.~ n TOTAL } a n nwnw <Haraaa. >. M hawirn brill Shaw IvM M li<anra _ C'ry l' ~ ! E. AV+IbE Adds (d 6Eaan1 (Ha SI-M:wh wd fa.w •r-w: ,r...i ...,... T...~................. n...a,rr ia, rrera )aa ww a:eraNa arr w M a<a^Aa,o N Ma AI<ahWk EaHHya [aMrq AH w r.p~Mau al da DaprbHnl ar• lui'iiH N Iha A<rt L 1. Eylain a "vs" anlwar H xaw a a 10 m m eLla<hHmr :.hieh dW M tlawnad yeH M IN< eppAtaXan. - Lt. Aaplwab allaH lal AH1 mE :nawfar aHlb'ad b anrala YcmM pm:r< vdl han ep da analAl<anem el • a<m<w, all fi IM M .EI nel .idoH w <ew w oaH:il b M NNad my d d. pe.iiana N da AkehM4 M.amp CaaHl At1 I5. S1AIF Oi CALITOENIA Canty el ....... .................}______._4!?'aora_._.... ..___... Y.:Y. nw M i .. ^<~4n 4~~ TAn~ w hW WI~~+. w ~ .1 YI.w. ,..WLn N 1..w:w nVw"~. M x M.O, x. ~H w~.w.: w< W.. ~ ... ~.yM^. V ~ ia~^+iM +Hw +. ti 1V~r. Wa:~r.,~y yii.M .nM M1~ ~, ,4 N «wM' w i.r.r x.:M. wM w M .'r:r~M . 1w, . w MMI r ~<~ ^. m. M:wrwJ Y.wMnnwwwn x <M<.n W 0.w::wn,. :F ..xMM ...lnwr: ~. M YI:M • n M wMw.. :M +w:N. ~/..:r ..M:.. ~..M ::w w4r ., .L :~M. ".n n. ,m1~..< :, •.r D..w:r. aF: r r. 11. AINICANT SM.N NEAE ____.._.___ _______________________._______ __ __ ___ 1_ .................................................... ..........................._._......._____..___.___._.__, ArHICAiION fY 7EUNf1E110~ IS. SL.LTE Oi CAIIgANIA CamH W.__.___.__~.......,a.a[.u.ln.___.. DoH _...._._.11L _____________ nw, ..:.rr .I .n ~ An., N .M well r:r,l., Wrwnn x..wMn.n ., .Nnnin u Y.r.HL Wr r<~•i.w~F. r W gMrW Wow nnMn .MY.:.n Yw.< ^n n+M ti. w M1 Y ,".Jw wMa~ w. ~0.wr M nw,.w. w w <.I:M . u.w:. M nrnw .::y M e...l. wy..,yn .:yr M ".,vr."n .r 1n,.n, ~. .x:v.+. h I ..w "q N ,M::q :...Fry . b Orr,r~ Ilo .Ynl WNEa Cakro 7A4 Lfnr; Far [SrgrtbrM Uw (hdE AHwhad: ^ Iwwdad rorka, aldwla.v IaEIH. ........................ _._____......._....._...._ COIIES AUILED .__......___......_........__......_.... bm.al: Rae d_..........FW q . e..n: =1 .............. .........OAI<a m_... ... .._.._Rwwpl Ne. ....._.......... _... ..:~..:, ,n ~ •r.r QMIIIITJ'J zczz zvzt z;zz _ _ ~ a (~ d ~_ --~ - `~ I -2 '. ., ,I ~ ' ~1 ~ .. ~ ~ ~ -- :i j .l i \ p~~~ W.o 0 „\\ y ~ ~ J pp .x ~ <I a ~ ~ ~ ~ r•- ~~ ~ ~ <~ ~y I -= a jc~`~ X220 ,la ~ k y S N ~z ~ 4a ~ z~~L~ ~ //11 ~V AltIKtl10M t0~ AfLO1g11C tlt)YAOt IKlbtytl 1, iYRFIS) a 4CEN5E151 iMf NO. Ir DryslrwM N AkahN4 tMrq. CrMd i\YP ::,ALE ;F.NL.vTL tfGT111 NO. IA yen darna[olno IItaA ~,~ aAlt _ .n.w.«ww..«.x... C/I/k ~~I ~IP Dab FMe EN land ]. MAMgA a AFifKANIm *«.. Aadr AadMd a~dr s2 fitu ^ CAIbI.IB.LO. Elba !. 4 AICMN C, F11afw OaSn Is.uanca f11MnDalr CAIIN!.LLO~ va[Y c troraan J. ]. TIag51 d AANSAC110WS) IR lK. IYa! 5 JG. iJ Pnr. bt. I+.ctlon .`1W1) -fS- it CI 11 a. Ilar. d tWnr A[[oa i O[ava Ll4no[ 4 )iarllat !. laabn d tnNwr-NrnAr ud S1rM Ala A[[a+ Mry. rC ~ a ~ [~u ~ lO TAI t 50.10 a 111)4 San N RAnc ilO UC a o [dl n0 • D IlrlfrrY Donrr/. ). An Ftnil.l lmU. SRaa lYp Nlbnr !l-]5611 City liwM] Yea a. Mdfx4 MM.w M ditrra Aaw A~A.Mr rd Sa.w eifa^. I nx.l 9. Ion Yw..r bwn tfnrirl.l d • RAwIYt ID, Nsn )a..tr YieMd anY d IM FioMlir+ d do Akdrt[ f..ratr CaMd M a r.tabawa N M DrFVa.aal M^ main b M. Mf 11. lylaM a'If]" an[wt b Mwn 9 r ID O. an ananwbl ~M[ITtM,M Ow~wO /rt w bN OyFMw.n. ./. 11. Aeplkar WrM fal Mal aq rrq}r tMb/rJ b .nnda Annrd prnnw .All Saw aN M WaRA[^I+n d a R[rnraa, rd M\ ~ti Y i ,rl .1-1.b r •r. r arril b d rblabd env OI M. wwidem el do AlraAd[ tfnlaM CaMN Ad. 11. STAR Of CAl1fOtMA CwnlY d ....._San Mrnardl na _Dw_._ a/j4/.QL ............. ~l L tiw.Y. wJYM1.. M. nMMY x N, w~x.w w n Y/(. n trx n1aM~w w/ tn.r ti ~. Mr.~ wY Iw .M M M M .M1YwM xxu. J n wlw rn h w4r +xwx F is w 4rx M,..I x In w.Y~', ~wliww Frw ~. ~... ,r n.x Mi 1x .xN~ M ~ti• n .Y: Y A.yx wp.a.. x I.wxr .w~ A +w rb x Ir M wr-.. M . 4w ~ x IIM w 7.wn4 nr.Y ,ti ~. b1 Vn ixM^a .. ~swrr".. ~ n.Mn ~.xw b lu .'.x ro. w.~xw v n wx w.w. ... ~...x.+ w. N x. m.,w M .wrx.. x n ~~u . wx+..~n a ..w.: a +. r ~wr..r,ww -...:..._. w wx....~ » ...+,.. i:.wx n w e....,..... Ir. AMIICAM l.i ______________________________________________________ a •nueatioa ~r Twftnaaf ,i>eie) I5. SiAlf R UUIOSMA Cwnry d_..San.NlAAi'11n'[________________DaM ___.__.:._...__._..._....__ Y.r w+n w ........, w.x . ~..w... u... ,. Ylx .+.... in .. ww.w. x w x..x u w .n ......n i. w ~....n~ .Yw4.Y....x wV„ ww..:.....w~~. ni ... w. x .+,Y x...... .xwnn w...xw ah. r ». x+n.x .a . ur.,.nY .. n.....w» ..r,xn. „ ..~, ........~.. rY.x.:.n n.,n ~...s....ww ~..ww.1 .-+x. .. M .~.. x x,:e w n.+. e . x.... ~ ..x x xr A vw,Mn n n rmY ~ n,M. M nw.l~~,+.I M M Mnl~ ~xFnM• r W -M.~n ~~ nxn x. w/4w, n N 4.+,w rx w mWx. uwiF,r x I.. aywn, ~ AIMMd~ ^ trrdM ran[e, IlduebrY p.px, 0 ...................... .._CO.1lS MMIfD ..... _..._!._..._.. n a.,rwR Fw N........_bRld .............................O/..n....... _. _...1re1/lW ~~ w rr, .Il. \~r~~. - D. Nd WAI. Mlalo TA4 Line; Far dprlrml [1M ONF ~Y~; ,psi i y ~~~w ~,~y r//R~~o~~Dcvi7V Q,~,r++f ,~cp/N77f: ,r //~~ ~OdsniY- mF//~9dldsuT (QeGGQTY NORY(1 : /.wu KE](I.'LN7l d {~ rj C vL~cl7l/ ! C£dlre.RQ/ ~mrwlt~wx~c~ (!/F57 o CI~r~UB~ANc.ILJIACPU'J ~~ /~ /iR~ul ~cvV NRIM91019 NN NCOIIOIIC NYOIMI 11C9I1991SI 1. IYIry51 ~! U[FNSryS) TILE NO. fw Uyw1Mw1 M AIwMk 9..ws9! CaNd 190 590 N[N[d1ro o ~•f ON SAIJi BI EA X IIEtEIn N0. 1 3a atl C/ 9AI9 :r..~e. rN~w uurr..~ . G INE EATING lIMC GF001tl19C:SL CODE ]615 fAr.MrdVwll S.n91.1919w tar 4... - •«INY.. 0.w AI..~ 9. NAA1N3) EIr AMtIG1N7p) f"r hr"b SlBle SAEAr Stl AA911.ndw Slt ]GWI I~p/!r I99N9p EE.nIw DMw 9-1-9 i 0. [flry91 p 1911N1AClIGNISI ~ ~' 7[N iEA. 59i. S ISO.OU 9l CT ]0 1C' .. Nw« d 9.IM S.E.'• 0911 '.I ' '. S. 1w99« N 3.0wr-N.OY.r ad SIrwI 9000 iOOtAl 11 •lw.r SN• 11] Y IN ~CVC.9pIg9 911]0 SN N[EO rClro iOTAI 5150.D0 • N Ir.IMIn Lirww{ G1-195N9 i' Ar9 wMww wuN Y.9 9. N.N. y«...I bn1 n..101~ N.1.4.yT 10. N... f« .wr NINwd ..[ w N IlrwMiwN n .w AN....[ Mw.M CMMN M w n9.Mau d 9w Di9www. N• NQ I«wwlM Ant No - II. lglrll • "TES'.n1.9r w ].n. 9 a l0 ««.II.IAwu..MaA dwN M d««I 9.n N M91 al99aa9e.. I]. AgIG.M e9r«I lel N01 aq ^'^^~9w ..wM Awnrd p«dlw .19 Aa« .9 N 911.GE[^MwM N a 9wm«, aM AI NM MI .91 «I rlr4w owlMl N IIll.wd .^[ d Mw 9'9rHr"I N dN AA:.h.95 91wra9. CWN M. Is. sfAIE a uLEOe9A E...n N ----'~'~n'-~dcev_a~tArile9or----~t_ ~,s:Z = d Z--- ...., w ~.....r.......... w~. ~I.~r. .N...~1.:. ~...., :II INy ...wIN.-. n ~... ~r~. .~.. ..s • wlFn+ Nnn'n :~. tirWr~ Mn~ Mr w+n:« n .Y wlrr:'..::IxrM ~ nl N....µ.+ n ~Mrwr =~n:r hn n Niw N+w w In s!I'~'r n w.F.+`wn~r h ~r.WNM .... N+ INnrxn rn .h. nn wWrw+: n .rw. y/ywy n Irwr~ w..N. ~ rNlr h r ~ ~ . Y~ n N Nw ~ .p.~+ nw.~ w rr h. +wr ~rF wrrrM r Mr ~ .ua :M wMn .w1uM :r w «:. a ar~+•~ n r. w n rwwi . nMwrnr . n In ~ ~..M w ...iw+ ~ N :..I n IMn. wn rn/:n M w~lr.n: III 9n :Y :.wNn wrlNM ~r 4 -iY.-. F rF:~ :Y wi~• ~ h 0.r.rn ~ n :rrMN. I•rNY N M1 Cr.~:rn Ii. AMTKANI ' SIGN NE9E ~....::.::--...a.---•-___..._.-...--_-' ----------------------------------------------------------.. ~t-........... _ 11MlMasilON t7 iR1NfRROR IS. SiAtF q CAUHJMNA Cwrly a-]L-df N...__ .........................._..-0.w _......----.....--.-.~----- wN- ~~ .r.: .rn .~ h ...nw :. V.M. w•M:r ~. ~whK. AIM ..fir . ~ .w4n:~~ ~nf YwI:r~N::1-µ~4 4 r...r ..1w •rM..r.w rv '~• N M. Ip An..M Y4. ~ NMU.Mw n.. n M1 wMrn '~' ' 'n'~""'" ~~ N M r../n N ..nr.N~ h wrM1: 11 M ..nl. ~:I.r~.. ~ n++M N""'^ N u ~~ :. «':Nlr Nr ..r~r- •' r ~ .M: rr:.r.~ ..:r.~ MY nn xry .r nnM1 h 4r w xr.J~ T'NOI.' M M~ -.N N.rY..rn..n~ .-.Y--. Fni.NV r+lnrn. ~.MNr M M_ 4M1~ In:n..n ~.pn M wrn~ h 1. ~e~ ^'^N"~ ._ .. _ ~ w.. WN. n O~n~rn Anwhrd: ~~J 9wadW rwMer, ^ Iidwiwy ys..N, n y«.9k d« N..........19Id r... MAIIFD ....-.. B i. Pt .............. .-A.wl/I N....... 3 ...., Do Not WIIIr lrbw 7A4 LAw; Fa prprnw«I Uw Od9 ~. SMA4 1 8998 8998 9000 9000 9000 9ooa 9000 9000 9000 9000 102 102 102 104 106 109 I10 112 114 116 e a ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ I~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~ =h ~ b Id D P ~ ~ ~ ~' M In~ r ~ p ' I'~ A Tf o~. z ~ ~ z (-~, f p> M ~ ~ ~ ~~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i ~. _. \.l ?---~~ `~"s- ~ ` rr , ~~ 0116 o)ny ua 6e~p hll I Zll I Oll I }701 I )ol 9116 9116 9116 911 9110 spoo~~ san'IS Ie~n7eN '3'7'V N ~ V 911u` i 9116 c I~ (~ /N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT ~~' ~.~ ~_.,;~_ 0 8 F ~ Z U > 1977 1 DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: SURPLUS PROPERTY RECOMMENDATION: City Council declare as surplus property and authorize the sale of three (3) Nang workstations. BACKGROUND: The conversion of the Finance Division accounting system has begun with the arrival of three (3) [BM PC's. No longer needed for the finance application are three (3) Nang workstations. Staff has been advised that the resale value of these workstations is quite good when sold ..w ~r~Ju ul l~ iuiJ~c~ tLw~ ua o ayi tmn-eiJ< wu t. Identifying numbers are as follows: Tag Number 243 245 25 3 Model Number 2236 2236 2236 Serial Number 9152 9571 6561 Respectfully submitted, ~~ Jim Ilart Administrative Services Director JII:ES :cv ~~ -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 10, 1987 III D~7 T0: City Council and City Manager L 1977 FROM: Jim Nart, Administrative Services Director 0Y: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: 1986-87 BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS RECOMMENDATION: Council approve and authorize additional appropriations and estimated revenue for Lhe 1986-87 fiscal year. BACKGROUND: In the absence of a siz-month budgetary review. certain budgetary adjustments are being requested and incorporated to the fiscal year-end closure process. These adjustments reflect a more realistic and accurate level of activity and in all cases additions to appropriations are offset by higher than anticipated reserve or available fund balance. Fund/Account Number +/- Appropria Lion +/- Estimated Revenue 12-3900-4600 Interest Earnings + 66,000 12-3900-5180 Pedestrian Sidewalks - 35.000 12 ncn Donn pr,. y.~m n..A~ot . 71;noD 15-4637-8000 Program Budget - 365,000 15-3900-5185 Section 2126 - 57,000 20-3901-4600 lnte rest Earnings + 295,000 20-3901-7130 Park Development Fees + 384,000 20-4532-8000 Program Budget + 200,000 25-4285-7043 Capital Expenditures + 450,000 25-3901-4600 Interest Earnings + 260,000 25-3992-9001 Transfers In +],000,000 33-3901-4600 Iota rest Earnings + 7,582 33-3901-8520 Miscellaneous Revenues + 360,000 A2-3992-9001 ira nsfe rs In + 2,400 Respectfully su//bmJ//Ji^^tQQt~~rre//d, Jim Bart Administrative Services Di rec for JH :ES :cv ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: 9Y: SUBJECT: September 16, 1987 Members of the City Council and City Manager Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: c ~~ '~ 0 0 F~ $ Z U 9 1977 I Approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report for Tract Map 13118 within Assessment District 86-2 (Dwight Prench). EVALUATION: Pursuant to Part 10 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 for Apportionment of Assessments because of the subdivision o! land; the approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report Se necessary, Iris iceauiuiiun directs the assessment xevenue Section to prepare a Reapportionment Report, amend asaesament diagram and establish fees for apportionment which is six hundred dollars. Respectfully submitted, ~~ zzo Aaelatan~Manager RAR:JBF:sgr Attachment: Resolution ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report // RESOLUTION N0. ~ ? -~-~' 7 b RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND AMENDED ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-2 (DWIGHT FRENCH) AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMENT FEES FOR TRACT MAP 13118. WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously confirmed assessments in a special assessment district, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act oP 1933", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs Por unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1935", being Division 10 of said code, said special aesesement district known and designated as Assessment District 86-2 (hereinafter referred fo as the "Assessment District") and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and/or parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assessments have been apportioned or divided; and, WHEREAS, at this time this legislative body Se desirous to order the reapportionment of said unpaid assessments pursuant to the provisions of Part 30 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915". NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREHY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the Superintendent of Streets is hereby ordered to file with the City Clerk a report entitled "Reapportionment Report" and an amended assessment and diagram of the original parcel or parcels of land affected by such division or transfer of ownership, segregating and apportioning the unpaid installments of the original assessment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the original aesesement Sn accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the original lot or parcel, plus costs and fees of ,-„aking the apportionment. SECTION 3. That this legiela Live body hereby determines and eatabliat~es a Fee in the amount of six hundred dollars to cover the coats oP the reapportionment. 0 UnseoN, Law a Grsensp~n, En9imon Page Three A.H. REITBR DEVELOPMENT Hay 15, 1987 can W passed Sros intersection to interssetion. This tiae block i• called the band width aiW represents the nuaber of seconds oL gram ties which will b• available for progressive (continuous) aovesent through the systes. Ne have welco^sd the opportunity to again be of service and stand ready to provide further consultation as say W needed. should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Jay Nelson, who prepared the PASSER Ii-81 cosputatione or syself. very truly yours, LZNS1Cyy0I~~T~~,~~LAW i GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS V /lL/n'`- Jack M. Gresnepsn, P.S. Principal JHG/gse 10/0-9~7R Z/ U IV/11TAtFON NN AIOONOIIC FaVaAM UERIN~iI I. 1)IF(sl Of IICENSryS) PNF NO. )w Oyiriui d AleeMk Mvaw Cpnlyd V4~ °F I~ Sin RG[PG[G1m ON SAL6 BRER N iFCFNt NO. 3 ~OA I K ~ ~Ir ~ :w....e...nr us.nP.. i INE Gi1NG PIJ1C[ Of0f iV Af COO! J615 ~y)i9Pr~N~ 3. NAMy31 p AI/IICANI(SJ ~' nNiwr sle3R SAGA. su •wF.1 irdw Sa rs9u FriNlw Doi: tiiwnw p !f(iN.r Ow• 9-1-i) S. ITPFIiI OF TRANSACIX)N S) ~ ~. TtR van- )sr. 9 lsG-aG it R ]0 1 C Nenx d inllw aiW4 wll , s, lerelbn N F.w..-w.A...r:..w 90W rmtAl 11 91vd.. SY. 113 R~illpho NcC~ 91)]0 Bin M nirtllm IOTAI F150.w 6. N Fwdrn lknM. i1-195aA9 r. iN mlwu nwi yii SM. T[ri N flue CiN IiIdA) a Aldfni AYrii 0f eR.NM I.Pw n-NNns..ie sR.w r'•..,,•--I brlN .irNln.e N i Idw~t r 11. Eyldn i'1N'rN.w I. iwn v « 10 in m .niaAnmi NAPE Ndf b. N..nrN riN N xN. iOPINiiP^• I). APPlkan spin (il IMf elp ^iniiv en~Mlr P[mNd PrNdM .RI Mn M NN 9w4M^P^'^ N • A[iNw. wd bl IINN M wW M nNlili « twri w PirP:R p 1i ddrlPl in1' d N:r pe.idem N IM •4GhiA[ in'iriri CaMPI Ad 11. STAIr q CAIMOR/NA CiiM) d.--..~rlN_~LBNd2L/NPMr_-...fj. Zz_g~__.. VJ• .wMr N wFr. •~ N~ -ham Nom. w.. ~rx~n uN w• :1: w. w h wlMr+. r w N :In ~~ M•~ .b N h MMS'• •~P~e4.. +•P rr~YP +I:•wL+Mr w:y:~I w .Mr wM:•n:r: r• w wLN: niw NV 1.w• h w:Mr+ ~ ~ ti ~ iti~ r Yin• ~M :~ h qWN • ~ Tnr+YM.T• ~ r a~•k1 ~r.:w: nM•MN ~ NrP w: •r/:•w+' ~ :rlr. h .w•Iw rr/v4 !rww~ .r•L ' • w N . M w n INn w ABM wN .~ ..nNr IF `n ~,NM h rn n .W rwln wM•NM N W -M: a yrr~.• r •.'^ r wr/1M . r•Nrnnr w r Iw w- nMrr N .wN~r r w 4F~P r'H. n •nMr N ~~: In Nw h nwNw MNMN4..~r ~• -~.~ F Nr•r w w<~ r h Yrw. -A ::r •rwF+r I:M'Yn n h o•r^•+n IA. AIFIICAN( ' SIGN NFN ....r.:.,____~a________________________ ____________________-._-____..___________---.._._.___-__... . gf________ ______________________________ _______ __ ___ AMIICASTON t7 TIN1NfrlII0R IS. SIAIF d CAINUMNA CPMy __ 8-31-BT 0.F. .. u..Y ~.r4r d u•Mr.,y /~~ -4x Nr'r• .r..~r • : h 14rr. • m M r~~r•M• Ir•PN.~ •W wY~ eIl•M w nwNr~+F+:+~ ~:n ~:1::M M1• 4 ~Nr~ .•N++~ ~~•n •In wn4/ M•.wl•I M r. Yr~ :r h •wY•M N Y.M:rs r .wlr M ..~.rMy h q•eri nl .u ~w +NFh r rrt•N n~.Nr •w :.w •.•. M:•F w• rrr•+ N . L. r rrr. wNr In• Nr•M~ h `r n ~~ w rwMw wI4N+~n Y•r• -M. h 0.wN~+ w •• ~•.J:~ -nu:r•T,I rwr=. •Mw N •mlrw r r M••A r :.n. • r N m.• ••r h Ir .nP•Nr M -~~. F . w. uw n •~/::~ hMMr x hr~~w.• n uAi1D. •IOiipA 19. l«exin Nwnlwr aM Slml Ciry and TP Calr Ciinry iom sm DP Nm WrIN Erlom TA4 Llir; F« OepeNmml Ure ONG Aa«AN: i:~J A.rwdPN mn<.. ~] pN«iiry pogo. 0-1)-A1 ...................... COPIES MAIIFO ........._.......-..._....-._..-....._._.__ ~ -~ ---- ~°---~ ~-- -r;..:.: r14nPw4fwd_.._... Jd/w-....-.... '__.._O/nm........._.._...baWNi ...................... 3 .,N,. S,lda~ i 8998 8998 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 102 102 102 104 106 10A 110 112 114 116 s ~ Z i ~ ,o, % ~ ~~ (~ ~ v e o ~ w i N C f$ Y K- ~ ~ p• R ~ <. ~ I~ a Dr ~~ m a s M ~ ~ ~ 4 Z r p C C ~ ow N o ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ P ~ ~~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ _~ ~w =a ~ s ~ ~ ~ ,o o _o - oW ~o ~ r n f~ ,~ ~o ow ~o ,o -w~ ~~ ~~ ~~ o ~o ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ , ro n n 0 ~~~ _, Oll6 o7ny ua6e~)I rn ao o~w,n n.~. '7 STAFF REPORT ~~~~~~~ ~ i O E U 1977 DATE: September 16, 1967 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Nart, Administrative Services Director BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: SURPLUS PROPERTY City Council declare as surplus property and authorize the sale of three (3) Nang workstations. BACKGROUND: The conversion of the Finance Division accounting system has begun with the arrival of three (3) IBM PC's. No longer needed for the finance a pplitation are three (3) Nang workstations. Staff has been advised that the resale value of these workstations is quite good when sold Ina lv iauaiiy ra tiler than as a sys iem-wide un ii. Identifying numbers are as follows: Tag Number Model Number Serial Number 243 2236 9752 245 2236 9571 253 2236 6567 Respectfully subm i^t to/d. /~ ! ~ ~r~~i~~ Jiin Ifart Administrative Services Director JI1: ES :cv 7 --- --- CITY OF RANCH(1 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 10, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Rdminis trative Services Director BY: Elizaheth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUBJECT: 1986-87 BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS RECOMMENDATION: Council approve and authorize additional appropriations and estimated revenue for the 1986-81 fiscal year. BACKGROUND: In the absence of a six-month budgetary review, certain budgetary adjustments are being requested and incorporated to the fiscal year-end closure Process. These adjustments reflect a more realistic an d accurate level of activity and in all cases additions to appropriations are offset by higher than anticipated reserve or available fund balance. Fund/Account Number +/ - APUrooria tian ;/- Estimated Revenue 12-3900-4600 Interest Earnings * 66,000 12-3900-5180 Pedestrian Sidewalks - 35,000 io nY3i onnD nr......... o~a..,.• a vt nnn 15-4637-8000 Program Budget - 365,000 IS-3900-5185 Section 2126 - 57,000 20-3901-4600 Interest Earnings + 295,000 20-3901-7730 Park Devela pment Fees + 384,000 20-4532-8000 Program Budget + 200,000 25-4285-7043 Capital Expenditures + 450,000 25-3901-4600 Interest Earnings + 260,000 25-3992-9001 Transfers In r1 ,000,000 33-3901-4600 Interest Earnings + 7,582 33-3901-852D Miscellaneous Revenue s + 360,000 42-3992-9001 Transfers In + 2,400 Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ /./ ~~ Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JI1:ES:cv ~10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 16, 1987 Members of the City Council and City Manager Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager Jerry H. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator L-p c~~^^+o,~ 2r ~ yC) r o ~ i'- ~ z U'i > ~- 1977 ) Approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report for Tract Map 13318 within Assessment District 86-2 (Dwight French). HVALUATION: Pursuant to Part 30 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 for Apportionment of Assessments because of the subdivision of land; the approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report Se necessary. This Resolution dlrects the Assessment Revenue Section to prepare a Reapportionment Report, amend assessment diagram and establish fees for apportionment which is six hundred dollars. Respectfully submitted, ~~ zzo Assistan~Manager RAR:JBF:sgr Attachment: Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report RESOLUTION N0. ~7~~-+'CJb RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OP A REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND AMENDED ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-2 (DWIGHT FRENCH) AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMENT FEES POR TRACT MAP 13118. WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously confirmed assessments in a special asseasmeni district, pursuant to the terms and provisions oP the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of said code, said special aesesement district known and designated ae Assessment District 86-2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District") and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and/or parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assessments have been apportioned or divided; and, WHEREAS, at this time this legislative body is desirous to order the reapportionment of said unpaid assesamente pursuant to the provisions of Part 10 of the "improvement Bond Act oP 1915". NOW, THEREPORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the Superintendent of Streets is hereby ordered to file with the City Clerk a report entitled "Reapportionment Report" and an amended assessment and diagram of the original parcel or parcels oP land affected by such division or transfer of ownership, segregating and apportioning the unpaid inetallmenta of the original assessment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the original assessment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the original lot or parcel, plus costs and fees of making the apportionment. SECTION 3, That this legislative body hereby determines and eslaLiishes a tee in the amount of six hundred dollars to cover the costa of the reapportionment. / 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION TRACT MAP 13118 September i6, 1987 Page 2 SECTION 4. That the Superintendent of Streets shall, prior to making a division and making the amended assessment, notify the owner of the original parcel or parcels assessed, ae the name of the owner or owners appear on the last equalized assessment roll Por taxes, or as said owner of owners are known to the Superintendent of Streets, of the order of this legislative body fixing the coats and Pees of the apportionment, and directing that the payment of such coats and fees be made to the Superintendent of Streets within fifteen (15) days of such notification. In the event that the reapportionment Pee is not paid within fifteen (15) days of such notification, the Superintendent of Streets shall proceed to prepare the amended aeaeaement and shall show separately thereon, but as a part of the total, the reapportionment fee chargeable to each divided parcel. l9 nrmv na. n ~ wrnvn nr rn . vnvn . STAFF REPORT ~~~w,~`+.r DATE: September 16, 1987 ~ Q F D T0: City Council and City Manager `'~ 19ii FROM: Russeil H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: B1ane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Haven Avenue Median Phase II. A Resolution to call 1n all Liens, Bonds, and/or Development Agreements for the funding of Haven Avenue Medians. Also to establish policy pertaining to the requiring of future development to reimburse for median construction by adding a reimbursement clause to the Conditions of Approval for undeveloped properties fronting Haven Arenue. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by Resolution, call for a transfer of all in-lieu fees paid to the City for Haven Avenue Medians m be transferred Lo a fund for payment of the pending Naven Median Construction. By the same Resolution, it is proposed that all development Donding for Haven Avenue Medians be called in and othervlse changed to a liquid asset and to transfer such to the before mentioned construction fund. Any payments on lien agreements for Haven Median Construction shall also be directed to reimburse the construction fund for such improvements. It is also recommended that a policy statement be adopted by Resolution rn Pttahlith a roi ~hureswM ..1 LY:_ i~ ah~ J;ruitiGBi iur development for undeveloped properties aiong Haven Avenue to reimburse the City the costs for constructing Lhe Haven Avenue Medians. BACiccROU-uiANAtrsls: Over the years, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has accepted fee's Tn-lieu of construction and bonds guaranteeing participation in construction and lien agreements to participate in the construction of Haven Avenue Medians may also be found to exist. On August 19, 1987, the City Council authorized Lhe advertisement for Bidding for the construction of Haven Avenue Median Improvements, Phase II. ao CITY COUNCIL STAFF REDORT RE: NAYEN AVENUE MEDIAN PNASE II September 16, 1987 Page 2 To provide for such construction the In-lieu funds, any bonding, or payments on any lien agreements pertaining to such construction now must be transferred to a construction fund or otherwise converted to usable assets earmarked to reimburse the City for the pending improvements. In addition, it is recommended that a policy be estabiished where undeveloped properties fronting onto that portion of Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Arrow Route shall be repaired by condition of approval, to repay the costs for such median improveaents before approval is granted for the development of such property. Resp submitted, ~"`7 Attachments a~ RESOLUTION N0. p 7 - `7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO FUNDING FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN PHASE II CONSTRUCTION NHEREAS, the Ciq Council of the City of Rancho Cucasonga at its regular seating of August 19, 1987 approved the advertisesent for receiving Construction Bids for Naven Avenue Medians from 4th Street to Arrow Route. NHEREAS, the City has collected fros Haven fronting properties, fees in lieu of construction, bonds for participation in construction and/or lien agreeaents to participate 1n the construction of Haven Avenue Medians. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucasonga that: 1. A11 fees collected to-lieu of construction for Naven Avenue Medians be deposited in a construction account or fund to be used for the pending Haven Avenue Median Construction. 2. All bonds received fray developers guaranteeing participation 1n the construction of Naven Avenue Medians be called to or otherwise converted to a liquid asset and deposited in a construction account or fund to be used for the pending Haven Avenue Median Construction. 3. All lien agresaents pertaining to the construction of Haven Avenue Medians be awended to sake paysent to a construction account or fund t0 be used for the oendina Haven Avenue Median fnnctrnrtlnn or to relsburse the City for the construction thereof. 4. All remaining undeveloped properties fronting onto Haven Avenue shall be required by Condition of Developsent t0 retaburse the City for the cost for their proportionate frontage of the Haven Avenue Median Construction. ir- a~ STAFF REPORT V ~~`~~,~+.~ a Date: Septewiber 16, 1987 ~ ; f To: City Council and City Manager " ' ign Fraa: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Sub,)ect: Approval of the location of a previously approved Adult Crossing Guard on Sapphtre Street at Orchard Street RECONEIOAT[OM• It is recoa~aended that the Crossing Guard assigned to Sapphire Street for Stork School be placed at the intersection of Orchard Street. The Public Safety Caaatission held a public Aearing at Tts September 1, 1987 meeting to recetve input fraa parents and school officials to deterwine the location on Sapphtre Street for a Crossing Guard for Stork School. After discussion of staff analysts and public Input, the Commission unanimously approved (5-0-2) the asslgnaent of the guard at Orchard Street. Respectf submitted, ~/ i ~~~` a3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: Septeaber 16, 1987 u '~Q' To: City Council and City Manager wr, From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Subject: Approval of an Adult Crossing Guard for Victoria Park Lane at the intersection of Victoria Park Lane and North Victoria Nindrows Loop for Nlndrows School It is recommended that approval be given for the assignment and funding of an Adult Crossing Guard at the above location. BACKGRDU~• The Public Safety Commission discussed the need for a Crossing Guard at this location and received input from Victoria residents and school officials at its September 1, 1987 meeting. The Caanlssion voted unanimously (5-0-2) to recommend to the Council that a guard be assigned. Respectfully submitted, ~,~i r ~Rfi~~ aN ------ CITY OF RASCHO CliCd~10\G~1 ~~c.xsipt STAFF REPORT ~~°' ~y T jA\ Y~ DATE: Sept?tuber 16, 1987 _ ~- r T0: City Council iu FROM: Russell H. Magui rz, City Enginaer 8Y: Dave Blevi ns, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Award agreement to Pitassi-Dal mau Architects of Rancho Cucamonga for Design of City Corporation Yard at 9153 9th Street and preparation of plans and contract documents for the amount of $107,645.00 plus a ten percent contingency for a total of 511.8,430.00. RECOMMENDATION: Award agreement to Pitassi-Dal mau Architects of Rancho Cucamonga for the design of the City Corporation Yard at 9153 9th Street and preparation of plans and contract documents for the amount of 3107,645.00 plus a ten percent contingency fora total of 5118,410.00. BAC KGROOND: Last year in keeping with Council and Administration goals to improve and expand the City's Pub'.ic Works Maiatenance Programs and Services, Council approved Uz acquisition of an existing building and property at 9153 9th street for the purpose of constructing a new City Corporation Yard. After a to reful and lengthy review of a number of specialized firms, Fleet Maintenance Corporation of Houston, Texas was selected to analyze the City's resources and needs, with regard to a Public Works Maintenance Facility, in order to produce a master plan for the development of the nrv City Corporation Yard. At th_ same time, Pitassi-Dal mau Architects of Rancho Cucamonga were chosen to develop an acceptable concept and design for renovating the facade of our new acquired building through the lea r, both firms worked closely and expertly with Staff in developing master plans and concepts for the new facility. At thi; time, Associated Engineers of Ontario are preparing to submit a ma;7zr grading pion for the new City Corporation Yard Sased upon the ma aer Ilan Aevrl npnd by Plaat Maintend nrn, 'We ar= no•w at the stage to begin designing the new facility and preparing plans and specifications for construction. As part of a three W five year phased program, funds ha°^ been budgeted City Corporation Yard as City Corporation Yard Page 2 for fiscal year '87-'88 for construction of the new facility including fuel tanks, car wash, temporary vehicle maintenance shop, parking lot, building facade and landscaping. Oue to new laws regarding the maintenance and monitoring of underground fuel storage tanks, the County of San Bernardino has mandated that the City must abandon its existing underground fuel storage tanks at 111 N. Grove Avenue no later than December of 1985. Given this relatively short time frame in which to construct a new fueling facility, and the highly technical and detailed process of completing construction plans and specifications based upon design concepts developed by Fleet Maintenance and Pitassi-Dalmau, Staff is recommending that the Council approve a negotiated agreement with Pitassi-Dalmau as prime consultant with Fleet Maintenance providing specialized support through Pitassi-Dalmau in order to produce plans and specifications and provide construction consultation support. Respectfu mitted, l ~wrw es/ra`- ~~ ,,,.,,, STAFF REPORT ~~'~~, ~+.r o } a F U 1977 DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City planner SUBJECT: HAYEN AVENUE MEDIAN BREAK BETWEEN 6fH STREET AND TRADEMARK e er o gus reques ng ounc consideration of modlficatlons to the median Island design to provide a median island break between 6th Street and Trademark for the purpose of serving approximate 36 acre site on the west side of Haven. I. RECOIMAENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the eso u on o ntent to consider a median break on Haven Avenue between 6th Street and Trademark. II. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: On September 2, 1987 the City Council cons ere a app can s request fora median break and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Intent with condlttons. Staff has prepared the attached Resolution for Ctty Council consideration. Re~fully u tted, B B Ci ty~anner BB:vc cc: Russ Maguire Paul Rougeau Attachments: Letter dated August 19, 1987 to Mayor Stout Resolution of Intent a7 August 19, 1987 • Mayor Dennis Stout and Council Members CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBJECT: DESIGN OF HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN Dear Mayor end City Council Members: Ne are pleased the City is pursuing development of the landscape median along Haven Avenue. It is our belief Chet once completed, the median will provide for both the enhanced aesthetic quality end better treff is control in the eree. As you know, we ovn nearly 36 acres on the west side of Haven Avenue south of 6th Street. Ne know that in the future this site will be master planned for a major office and business community. Part of our concern in assuring that this site can be well planned is that traffic circulation Doth to end from the site is eveileDle. Because of the limitations of treff is ecceas already imposed on the site [he addition of a median without any direct cross ecceas rould greatly limit the potential of creating a well planned office end business community. • We have contacted representetivea of the A.H. Reiter Company to help in working with the City to explore the problems end develop solutions. After studying the matter vith the City Engineer, a treEf is consultant, and representatives of A.N. Dn: re. ,...i: .~.. -- -~~ ~..~.. - c~caaoiy i.u i~a Ve a ContrOilem intersection end~thus evoid~causing additional traffic problems to this eree. We ere Baking the City Council to consider a request to hove a controlled intersection located approximately midway between Trademark and 6th Street along Haven Avenue for direc4 access from both sides of Haven Avenue. ~ -' It is our intent to cooperate with the City in making sure the[ this task is complete. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. cere}y e5G~6-!!G ~T %~" Ma L Fnlni Victor Buccole cc: Le wren Nesserman, City Manager Russ McGuire, City Engineer Brad Buller, City Planner Enclosure: Letter from A.H. Reiter Co. a$ August 19, 1987 TO: Mayor Dennis Stout and Council Members CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA FROM: Timothy J. Beadle A.N. REITER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY SUBJECT: FUTURE MEDIAN DESIGN ALONG HAVEN AVENUE BACKGROUND Ne he ve been asked to study the effects of the Haven Avenue median dsaign on the development and circulation for property along Haven Avenue between 6th Street and Tradesark Street spec ifice Lly the xest aide of Nnven Avenue (see exhibit A). Our investigation has shorn that in Chia area, potential Creff is access and circulation Oroblema exist end li air rho ;...i n,.u.,r.r:.... of the Haven Avenue overlay district policies. This memo will outline the problem end aveile ble solutions. The owners of approximately 36 acres south of 6th Street on the rent side of Haven Avenue know that in the future [he entire site will be master planned Eor en office and business park designed to meet the Haven overlay standards. However, it is [hair belief Chet under the current circulation errengene nt both egress end exit to the site is difficult et 'yes[ end potentially hazardous a[ worst. i 29 It is their request to examine the circulation difficulties to the •ite and to consider the addition of e controlled intersection betraen Tredeaerk end 6th Street along He van Avenue Co help eliminate the difficult circulation both to and From the subject property on either aide of He van Avenue. ISSUES The original induatrisl specific plan end eccospenying circulstion police set out to isplasent a 1srWscaps ^e6 ien along Haven Avenue rith the spacing batman controlled inNrsactiona s sinisus of one par 1/4 mile. Although thar• is sore than 1/4 sil• batvun purposed signs la at Tradaserk end 6th Street the proposed design of the future sedian does not provide for any opening. The arse has aignif icent circulation roost reints ispoaed on it Dy th• devalopeant of the Luak Industrial Tract south of the site. Access from the potential project site going south would require im pl ementntion of the circulation aysCes which cross other percale outside the project boundary (see exhibit B). This necessitating participation of others in order to effect ively 2 ~b impl scent this proposed circulation system. Further, trefEis could ba routed into Tredeeerk in the Luak Tract which is designed es a tro lone local induatriel coed. The implementation of a continuous medisn that doee not allow cross street access along Haven Avenue establishes further treff is conatreines. A treff is circulation study has shorn that significant proDlees occur Eros both in bound end exit traffic to the project site ss a result of the circuitous traffic pattern (sm• exhibit C). Por •xemple. s significant portion of Crsftic floc to the sit• could be generated from the •ou[h, therefore, necessitating increased U-turn mov cents et the intersection of Nevan anu o,.n ~creec. The Nevan overlay district was implemented of ter the induatriel spec if is plan adoption. The lend use requirarents with the district limits leas intense activities such ea werehoueing distribueion end R & D for mcre intense office development along Haven Avenue. The effect was to intensify the lend use ectivitita but by doing so it also increased the circulation problems which already existed in this particular arse. 3 3~ The Haven overlay district hea precipitated certain changes in circulation effecting this area Chet rare not present et the tine of the apecif is plan adoption. One, a need to provide adequate circulation access to the office corridor along Haven Avenue, two, intenaif ication of land use along Neven Avenue and three, stipulation for en eras wide aster plan including circulation rith access Co end fro^ the site. Tha overlay district requires that the entire site be nester planned into an integrated developeent. Thi• ameter plan requireaent ekes sense on a parcel of this size. An integrate6 cizculation syeeae for this parcel would eli sinate Che circuitous design sa shorn within she industrial specific plan end craet• s ^trong focus or entry to the project. This focus is necessary to iopleeent Che office corridor along Hsven Avenue. Without direct cross access Eros Neven Avenu• end e focus entry ouch of the Neven office frontage would be ext reoely difficult tb is pl event. a ~a Op7I0NS The solution to en effective circulation plan for the site is the design of en intersection into the project located epproxieetely mid-point betveen Trademark end 6th Street. This option was presented to the City Engineer end et his request a traffic study was conducted which examined the of facts of n signalized inters action appropriately located along Neven Avenue (see exhibit D). The study by Linecoct, Law and Greenspan exnmined the ultimate carrying cepeciey of Haven Avenue, along with Che reco^unded •pead pattern under a synchronized system of signals along Neven Avenue. The study concluded Chet s signalized intersection appropriately located could be designed to implement the psrametars of the ereffic needs for Na van Avenue. CONCLUSIONS The inherent trsffic constraints and increased development requirements for en office corridor along Haven Avenue have necesaiteted a need to look torecds e controlled intersection suitably placed for convenient access to both sides of Haven Avenue. It has been 5 33 concluded by the treff is study that a controlled intersection will work end will not present eppreciaDle conflicts to the traffic flor petterna, sore spec ificelly it rill enhenc• traffic circulation to and froe the parcels by avoiding needless soveeents end circuitous traffic patterns. Traffic planning end design needs for Chis intersection should ba done now, prior to the develop ant of a eedien. The owners of the property slong rith ourselves will be available to help sssist in the design end i~pleuntetion of thi• •yate~. Ne ask Chet CM City - Council look et this estter and provide adsquete direction to both ste Cf end the property owners. cc: Lauren Nesssrsen, City Manager Ruaa NeCuire, City Engineer Bred Buller, City Planner 6 3~ •aiK ~ •. c' .~ ~.. f ]CC •9 K. LY2 , Z I ice' _ it ~./ + , ~ % ~ f; ~ ~ `~~~ tOf t,~ + r STIEIT -~-__"°„`._71"1 r~ `-gyp ~C ytJr~ ~:T ,i P~ » ^.` ! I K I•I K. N t`~: a InK. o(+ t ~I. gyp' I fet ~® ~ I a • '4 •O '~u ,~ ~ ~ O~ It J ~ ~~ r 1rK 1h.a L- .111 ~:aK ~Y+®~: a i~M III ' toLLr< _ _ 'T+' a T n~ '~ nu k . _ )r•aer sIl ~ r " ~°' ~ C"l 9 8 ~ ®~ f~J aff t :, I. l^ tat ~fot ~ s1K ~f Inty' r®~ ,®e I®La e ~ to i ~a r~~~ ofa aC~^" ^ .o. a I b I ~``.~ J I ~C : ~ ® O~G ~rl I 7 La.1K +La .,? i ! •iK , `H' NCO ~ ®t ,® Q~~A0~ f® W ~.' r Ir ® a~t C' IY a .<~C' Ci ~I ~" ~ fY K H~~ V Iii ~ ~I ~.• I ~ •iK 1 gY1't I 6~ ,~. ~ ~`,C. fi% fTfK Lt '~ ® °' ~ ~ ! 5 ' ~+~ r ~ 5' ' .. ~fTY+~STfEE~~ ~.+wY r~-~.~~..~.~TM-. ~. 1 e f III ant fat IBS r ~ u. © °~ u. I r F: L2~ ?~nrcg Ty I rt _ - ® ~r , )® ~, ~.Ye r.. • i' f» K °a n , ri eL ` a •» K Y f» K LS- ,In , «I J ~J .I - - 1K it r•c rt rt aat rit II~K ~ ~~ _ ~ ul ~. ~ nl• i WK fit ayt-~ v:c auL~ .,a:-~ fat r ,c:~ !, ~Iwr~'nz ~ rl (m' BAR laatf ~ .n .c ~•c. ~0 ~a~ n J yK Y~ MK K K ~K' 'f~ ~ fi]K I-' 'ITI ~~' '~ ~ i f» K ~` LLK WK pK '_ei I •1t[ . t76 Ar ~ »_j I~ fRNK a I ~ f` i ~ ~ ass n_fl _~ •^.' Isl i I r' 2kH.P:- af n /~ _ ., ~» ii>K faK rt •r yf~ Pawl ~ ~ I ~Of ~ n 70tH a^ ~ >.~ I r=:,=: ?.J^`= er 'w Fer ~Iw. Iws' 1.-.,.,.,„..:.. -~+: ~ ~~_, '~~! tf!•"~rAAfIfRIRI~~RR"esr•RRR EXHIBI? D ~ ~ INDUS TRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN .,.. ......_.. ~uDw~ n 9 it FILPi PROPERTY ~~ ~ , '""'- ~'~ ~ ~ i ,, ~~ 12 exRIeIT c TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS SURROUNDING FILPI PROPHtTY TO POLL011 AUGUST 2iTR c~ / exKtelT ~ LINSCOTT, LAW 8 GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS TRANSPORTATION PLANNMJG • TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • PARKING 1580 CORPORATE DRrvE. SUITE 122. COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92626 • IT1Q 6A 11667 ONILIP 4 LIN6COTT. P E JACK M 611EENSVAN, v E WILLMM A. L1W. P E PAUL W WKRINEpI. v E LEON o WARD. P E Nay 15, 1987 OONALO W GPKEP, P E Mr. Timothy Beedla A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT vice President Planning i Design P.O. Box 7250 Newport Beech, CA 92658-7250 Subject: PROPOSED NEM 6IGNAL ON HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN TRADEMARN AND 6TH STREET - RANCHO CUCANOMCA TwL Dear Mr. Ba le: As you requested, we have evaluated the potential impact of installing a nev signal on Haven Avenue, between Trademark Street and 6th Street in Rancho Cucamonga. Briefly, our study of eight key intersection locations in the two oils stretch of Haven Avenue between stn c~.... ~..! p~ ::ill Boulevard, indicates that the proposed signal would have no adverse affect on traftic progression slang Haven Avenue. The througA band width and the progression speed from Foothill Boulevard to 4th Street is identical with or without the proposed signal. We have consulted with City Staff and obtained from them future traffic volumes and plannW roadway geometries for use in our analysis. The traftic volumes provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are future traffic volumes projected by DES Associates in their Rancho Cucamonga City-wide Trattic study. High traffic volumes are predicted and consequently, as noted in the computer printouts, tA• volume at many locations exceeds capacity. However, this should not affect the results of this study, which simply compares potential traffic progression on Haver RveLiiia with and without the proposed signal. It should also ba noted that projected through volumes wets used in ibis analysis, and that the right-turn voluse• were not added to the through volumes. p,NFR OFFICES • PA.SADF NA 121 T1 Rtll 2R29 A ^AN ^6 GU IF191 "I'I Illell A,. ~G.'NR COMVANT 38 Llnseon, Law a Greenspan, Enyinaere Page Two A.H. REITER DEVEIAPldNT Hey 15, 1987 The computer program PASSSR II-Bt, davslopad for the US Department of Transportation by th9 Texas Department o! Highways and Public Transportation vas used in this study. Copies of tRa computer printouts showing the detailed analysis era attached For your use in meeting vitR City Staff. Two scenarios were used to evaluate the impact of the proposed aignal. In the first scenario any phasing (lead/lag, lead/lead, etc.) wa• allowed and the optimum phasing vas determined by the program. This scenario vas run with the nev aignal (Appendix A) Progression is ih• nev signal (Appendix B). The resulting seconds in th~ssdoytybcund 4're~tiona (A rHand) and d96 is• ends in the northbound direction (B-Band) (gee below). Mev en Avenu• teeth beune Nerth beune it9_11._is_![stIIlll llztl U-aa ne) ce-etna) _ . ie!!tlL!!ntl_YitlIL !e!!tlL!!n!_ Y1tltII 01}IMUN INAfIMt YItA !lanai N NIM/{{ fat N NIN/la A< Yithout fi[nel U NIM/{{ be N NIN/la tee LE Aa INt L[IF iUNM Yith fitnel {7 M/M/Z9 feC V NIM/i9 tat Ylthout fltntl {7 NIN/Z9 feC {7 NIN/2a fee In the second scenario (Appendix C with new aignal and Appendix D without the aignal), only leading left-turn phasing was used. This decreased the through band width, but again the proposed aignal had no adverse impset on progression through the system. The progreesion speed is {7 MPN and the band width i• 29 seconds in both directions when left-turn first phasing i^ used. As a matter of definition, progression is generally defined as the continuous movement of tratlic through a series of ^ignal coniroiied intersections (ie) passing LhrougA without stopping. The ability to do this i• expressed in terms oL both the speed which has to be maintained to go tree green aignal indication to green aignal indication, and the block of green signal time that 3y LinaeoN, Lsw a Grwmpan, Enpins~rs Page Three A.N. REITER DHVELOPNENT Key 15, 1987 can be passed Eros intersection to intersection. Thi• tine block is called the band width and repreunts the nuaber of seconds of green ti>te which will be available for progrsssivs (continuous) sova>.ent through the syates. We have welcosed the opportunity to again be of service and stand ready to provide further consultation as say be needed. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Jay Nelson, who prepared the PASSER II-et cosputations or syself. Very truly yours, LINSCCTT, LAM i GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS J~ Sack N. Gzeenspen, P.E. Principal JNC/9ae 30/0-947R U RESOLUTION N0. 0 / ' Y Q~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, STATING ITS INTENT TO CONSIDER A MEDIAN DREN( ON HAVEN AVENUE RETNEEN TRADEMARK AND SIXTH STREET NNEREAS, on September 2, and subsequently on September 16, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the concept of a median break on Haven Avenue between Trademark and Sixth Street as requested by Matt Filpi and Yictor Buccola in their letter of August 19, 1987; and NHEREAS, the property owners and their representatives have indicated their intent to attract and develop a high quality master planned development far exceeding the standards for the Haven Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the property owners have stated that a high quality master planned development can only be developed with a median break between Trademark and Sixth Street. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga its intent to consider granting a break in the Haven Avenue median island between Trademark and Sixth Street subject to the following conditfons: 1. A Master Plan is approved by both the Planning Commission and City Council and that the project design in all respects be judged to exceed the design standards of the Haven Avenue Overlay District and the Industrial Speciftc Plan. 2. The median break be found by the Planning Comaission and City Council to not result in any reduction in service levels or cause any adverse impacts to the transportation system of Haven Avenue or the surrounding streets. 3. The project proponent pays any and all costs necessary for said median break and signal including but not limited to the design, preparation of plans, and construction. 4. Any lass of median island landscaping be symbolically reintroduced into Lhe Haven frontage of the project site over and above the required landscaping as specified in the Industrial Specific Plan. y/ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN BREAK September 16, 1987 Page 2 5. The median break not occur until the City is in receipt of agreements and sureties that will assure the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the protect in its entirety, all 36 acres, will be developed in a timely manner as approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. ~l2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 16, 1987 ~', To: City Council and City Manager ~" mil from: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant GivTl Engineer SubJ ect: Approval LO execute Contract Change Order No. 2 (CO 86-114) with Linville, Inc., for sidewalk, drive approach and curb return revisions of the Base Line Nfdening Plans in an amount of 51,880.00 RECOMMENDATIOM• It 1s recommended that City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 2 (CO 86-114) with Linville, Inc., for sidewalk, drive approach and curb return revisions of the Base Line Nidening plans in an amount of i1 ,880.00 BACKBAOIIMD/AINLTSIS• The Defore mentioned Contract Change Order No. 2 with Linville, Inc., is for revisions W the plans which include the addition of sidewalks, commerical drive approaches, blockwall and revised curb returns for the Base Line Midening Project from the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks east of Hellman Avenue to Arch bald Avenue. The total amount of the Contract with this and previous Contract Change Order No. 1 1s now 522,345.00. The original Agreement was dated October 15, 1986. Respec tfu submitted, RHM:LEH:pam Attachment y3 cm of RANCIp cuouioNS~ ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER r er o.: Base Line Nidening from the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks Account No. 114637-8617 P,0. No. 000295 -Date: T0: Linville Inc., 9035 Haven Avenue, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamon a CA 91130 ng neer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. in Contract Price In Contract Price Revisions to plans which includes the addition of sidewalks, comaercial drive approaches, block walls, and revised curb returns. ;1,880.00 TOTAL f1,880.00 The amount of the Contract will be Increased by the sum of: One thousand eight hundred eighty Dollars (f1,880.0) The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Twenty-twc thousand, three hundred forty-five Dollars (522,345.00) The Contract period provided for completion will be Unchanged Days This document will become supplement to the Contract and all provisions will appll hereto. f Requested: ~'' ~SSS ~yf ty ng nee ~ ate Accepted: ~ //. ~ 9-a- d ~ ''~~e ate Approved: ayor, ty o ncho ucamonga ate s n or~at on a use as reco o any c nges or g na eng neer n agreement dated: October 15, 1986 CO 86-14 `~y n,mv nc n , wrnvn nrrn ~ vn,rn STAFF REPORT f~G~~'c o a~ p ; J. i~ ~~i DATE: September 16, 1987 19_~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engirreer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 9649, Located on the Southwest corner of N11son Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Thomas E. Tucker and Nilliam E. Garwin, collectively RECONEAMTIOM It is recommmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sublect extension agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Inryrovmaent Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 9649 were approved by the Ctty Council on August 20, 1986, 1n the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: f510,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5225,000 The developer, Thomas E, Tucker and Nilliam E. Gamin, collectively, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Extension Agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp 1 Submitted, RHM".C ~ ~ ' Attachments y~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ 7J~93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 9649 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on August 31, 1987, by Thomas E. Tucker and William E. Garwin collectively, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad3acent property public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at he southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub3ect to the terms thereof, is to be done in condunction with the development of said Tract 9649; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Inprovement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. li ~~ TRACT N0. 9649 L a _ ~.. ~ '_ ~ . f _ n®_' ~I ~ ~• . 'ATiff4~Tf~l I _ A. 3 u® ~ -~ ~ 1° M~~n ~pi'~ ~ r II I 1 - T.~ li ~ ® ~ .A 1 i _ I ~ d ~ ~ 9 ~ M"_ !1 ~r~~l ii.l.)~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION y7 PROJECT: TITLE: Tr.,.-F 64 EXHIBIT:._ __ n Till lTLi tl A \TliTTA /iTin A Tlnfin I STAFF REPORT (}~J~ L Y 'r z i O C DATE: September 16, 1987 ~ p '; U U 7 TD: City Council and City Manager tsn FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Steven A11en, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Haven Avenue Medians Beautification, Phase I Improvement Project from Arrow Route to 19th Street awarded to Valley Crest Landscape, Incorporated for the amount of 51,112,954.38 to be funded from Beautification Funds. RECONEMOATIOM: It is recoanended that Gity Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Naven Avenue Medians Beautification, Phase I Improvement Project, and authorize Lhe Administrative Services Director to expend 51,225,000.00, (51,112,954.38 plus lOf contigency) Lo be funded frga 8eautificattan funds. Background/Analysts On September 2, 1987, City Council awarded the subject project to Valley Crest Landscape, Incorporated. Staff has received from Valley Crest Landscape, Incorporated, executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respe tf~l. Nbmitted, ~ r/ RNM:SA: v~ STAFF REPORT V ,~~ ~. ~ ~ 4 DATE: September 16, 1987 j ~ ,? T0: City Council and City Manager ~s» FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven gllen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Traffic Signal at Haven Avenue and 4th Street improvement Project awarded to Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting for the amount of E 117,616.00 to be funded from TDA funds. RECOMlEIIp1TId1: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Traffic Signal at Haven Avenue and 4th Street Improvement Protect, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend f130,000.00 (f117,616.00 plus lOX contigency) to be funded from TM funds. Background/qn aly sis On September 2. 1987; C1}.y rnunr+> >-dcd t`c ;aLJzcl yiujecl co a~erra Pacific Electrical Contracting. Staff has received from Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal Pursuant to previously approved Cooperative Design, Construction and Maintenance Agreement between the Ctty of Ontario and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City of Ontario will be reimbursing the City of Rancho Cucamonga for one half the cost of construction of the subject project. Res pe 1y submitted, r ~9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Septanber 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion ,(~ ~vlcwarp,~ Z ~ yC1 z Y. Z F: :il. is 1977 The required street improvements for Tract 13066 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of E30,600, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5306,000. BackgroundJAnalysis Tract 13066 - located on the south side of 19th Street, east of Amethyst c...,. DEVELOPER: Nill Williams Development Corporation 5500 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Ste. 211 Rnaheim, CA 92807 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) E30,600 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Streetl ;306,000 Respect ly submitted, 7 RMM: w SQ RECORDING REgUESTEO BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0: C[TY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TWIT: 1, The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Tract 13066 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Boz 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91130. 3. On the 16th day of September, 1987, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Tract 13066 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was; Hill-Williams Development Corporation 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the Ci±y of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is 4escribed as follows: South side of 19th Street, East of gmethyst Street CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, a muni al pDrationr Owner ~J16 ~ ' ff at u e City Engineer d~~ RESOLUTION N0. p 7 -~9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIfORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13066 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public 1 roveaients for Tract 13066 have been coggleted to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engtneer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Coagletion is reQUired to be filed, certifying the vrork caaglete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign a~ file a Notice of Coapletion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~'~ sa nrmv nc n , ~,nvn n, r~ . i,n~ln . STAFF REPORT v ~~'c~,~.r DATE: September 16, 1987 ~p ; t-,! U T0: City Council and City Manager "~~ 19i~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMEMDATIOM: The required street Improvements for CUP 84-09 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk t0 release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 569,000. Background/Analysis CUP 84-09 - located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Avenue. DEVELOPER: Corp. of Presiding Bishop of the rb~ nM nt Jn rA..t C L~ _ i +V V YL,CI VYJ JOIIIYJ c/oYRonVIshily+ 3873 Schaeffer Avenue, Suite H Chino, CA 91110 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 569,000 Respec ull bmi tied, RHM: 53 RECOROIN6 REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NHEN RECORDED MA[L T0: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM NGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEAEBY GI YEN TNAT: 1, The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which Interest ar estate is: CUP 84-09 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner 1s: C[TY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, 9320-C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rarkho Cucamonga, California 91730. a nr the t.Fth Amy s e~~~~~s •_ loa7 th_re ry„n1n1nA tFL hereinafter described real property the ~rork of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: CUP 84-09 4, The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Church of Jesus Christ of Later-Oay-Saints 5. The real property referred to herein is situated 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: East side of Etiwanda Avenue, Ncrth of Yictoria Avenue CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a munlcl rations Owner a s City r ~y RESOLUTION N0. g7 ~ T /~ A RESOLUTICN OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 84-09 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 84-09 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~_~%'~~ ss STAFF REPORT V DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ,~ ~~'O'~ ~ r ~' ' o i fi I: U~I is ion -1 SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 10414 located south of Carrari Street and west of Naven Avenue, submitted by Greg Lundeen RECOMMENDYIi1Q1 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 10414, accepting the sub,lect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 10414 located south of Carrari Street and west of Maven Avenue, in the very low Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on September 8, 1982, for the division of 10 acres into 17 lots. The Developer, Greg Lundeen, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Band: 5322,500 Labor and Material Bond: 5161,250 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. Res pe tu11 ~ubmitted, C / ~~ R Attachments ~'~P RESOLUTION N0. p ,` ~ / b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 INPROYEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPRDVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 10414 NHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract Ne. 10414, consisting of 17 lots, submitted by Greg Lundeen, Subdivider, located south of Carrara Street and west of Haven Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act eF the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEAEAS, to meet the requirements esta611shed as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits Por approvai said F1na1 Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That said Improvement Agreement De and the same 1s approved and the M4yor Ts authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk 1s authorized to attest thereto; and z. Toot said improvement Security is accepted as goad and sufficient, subiect to approvai as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. ~~ VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~xa~uva nrvrs~ox N ~~ TPALT 10414 ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 16, 1987 F Q~ U~: U T0: City Council and City Manager iw~ FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award and execute the Professional Services Agreements for the construction surveying and staking for the Haven Avenue Medians, Phase I Improvement Protect specifically from Arrow Route to 19th Street contract awarded to Hackett and Kramer Surveying, Incorporated far the estimated amount of 521,968.00 to be funded from Beautlfication Funds. REC01lEIDATIOM: It is recowaended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to award and execute the Professional Services Agreements for the Haven Avenue Medians, Phase I Improvement Protect, and authorize the Administrative Services Dl rector to expend 524,200.00, (521,968.00 plus 108 contigency) to be funded from Beautlfication Funds. Background/Analysis On Auqust 19, 1987, City Council awarded the subtect orotect to Ya11ev Crest Landscape, Incorporated. Staff has received from Hackett and Kramer Surveying, Incorporated executed Professional Services Agreements and insurance documents, reviewed them, and found them to be complete and in accordance with the request for a proposal. Resp tted, 59 nT.PV nc D A unvn nr rn A vnLrn STAFF REPORT ~~'~~~~. o DATE: September 16, 1987 F'- a U a T0: City Council and City Manager ien FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steven Allen, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Archibald Avenue Realignment Improvement Protect from 19th Street to Highland Avenue with Highland Avenue Improvements awarded to Laird Construction Company, Inc. for the amount of (294,442.21 to be funded from Systems Development Funds. RECOI~EIOIITION: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Archibald Avenue Realignment Improvement Pro~ett, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend f324,000.00, ((294,442.21 plus l0E contlgency) to be funded from Systems Development Funds. Background/Analysis un HU9USL lY, lYtl/, Glty GOUOCII awarded Lhe sUDJ eCL prof ecL to Laird Construction Company, inc. Staff has received from Laird Construction Company, Inc. executed contract documents; bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Resp y bmitted, ~d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician GUCAMp~ G~ 7 Z ~, `' I ~' ~ I> tsn SUBJECT: ADProval of Map, Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tract 13542-1 located east of Chaffey College, between Nilson Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Grigsby Development, Incorporated RECOIMENDATIOR It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13542-1, accepting the sub,iect agreements and securities and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said maD to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13542-1 located east of Chaffey College, between Wilson Rvenue and Banyan Street, in the Low Residentia; Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 25, 1987 for the division of 67 acres into LUb IOL S. The Developer, Grigsby Development, Incorporated, is submitting agreements and securities to guarantee Lhe construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: TRACT Faithful Performance Bond: 5866,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5433,000 HILLSIDE S.D. OFF-SITE 5.0. 5437,000 228,500 (131,000 65,500 Copies of the agreements and securities are available in the Cf ty Clerk's Office. letters of apprnvat have been received from the high school and elementary scnool districts and Cucamonga County Water District. R es pe tted, i w Attachments RESOLUTION N0. p 7 - ~ ~/ A RESOLUTION DF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. I3542-1 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13542-1, consisting of 96 lots, submitted by Grigsby Development, Incorporated, Subdivider, located east of Chaffey College, between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided fn the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreements submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Securities, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NCAi, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1, That said Improvement agreements be and the crone are approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the Ctty Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subiect to approval az to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. rr ' '. I'i~l~~ ~'~~ ~"~~_- ,. _.__.. __. _1VILSON__..____.. __._AVENUE I.i. - ~ ~K, ~ ~w.l ~I~'~ ~(2~'.,9 ~ ~'i'2 G'. ~~ 8 ~~~ -Sig 'I .. ~2~ ~~ ~1'~I' O ~ 8 1 6'/~. I~b ••. 41 43 "rte' io .~ . 1~J _ ~"" ~ ~ t k° .~ HA - - - _ - .._ I~i~l ' `y~"''B~il \".I 2 -.\,,'_„I~Iw ~'~ I'.I',yi,~ ~.i .-. _ iiq~ _ .u _ I ~ ~ .. - '~i~~ v 6 ~' ~ J) Pa's b~ I ~ I 19335. 3L I ~- _ I I ail ~. \ 32 I _ )a~_~ o' ,(III ~~OS - 6Ei ~ ~ ~ ~ (/' _~ /l/, it (i i ,, ( CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~G~a10 DIVISION N rrEeet: Tjgq.$; iaacr 13542-I (~ 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September I6, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 87-20 - SI%TH STREET - TURNER L - u m tta o a reso u on en ng an appea l;o~n itions of Approval requiring the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Sixth Street for a proposed project located at the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and Sixth Street - APN 209-261-18, 19, and 22 RECOMEIIDI1TI011: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution. 8ACK6RDUID/IUNLY5I5: On September 2, 1987 City Councii denied the applicant's appeal of a Planning Commission condition requiring the undergrounding of existing Vrcl ilc of uLll 11.I C] aluuy ULII ~i.I CC L. liltl DL LUUICJ RtlJUlUL1Ull I'fa ICC1.5 that action. Resp y ub ted, r R __. Attachment 6y RESOLUTION N0. 81-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REYIEN N0. 87-20 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of TURNER AVENUE AND 6TH STREET !N THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - ADN: 209-261-I8, 19, 22. NHEREAS, on the 13th day of Mqy, 1987, a coaglete application was filed Dy Lennon Architects for review of the above-described protect; and NHEREAS, on the 8th day of July, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning CaawlSSton held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NON, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucaapnga Planning Ca~ission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. fiat the proposed project is consistent with the oD~ectlves of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is 1n accord with the ob~ecLive of the Development Code and the purposes of the district 1n which the site 1s located; and 3. That the proposed use 1s 1n compliance with each of the appllcaDle provisions of the Development Code; and 4. inuL i;ie proposed use, cogetner with the conditions appllcaDle thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially /nfurious to properties ar taprovements 1n the vicinity. SECT[ON 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the envtronmen an a! a Negative Declaration is issued on July 8, 1987. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 87-20 is approved subJect to the follow n~3itions and attached Standard Conditions: Plannln9 Division: 1. A11 roil-up and man doors shall be painted the same primary color as the building. 2. Textured paving similar to that used on-site shail be provided at the project entrances. 3. Vine pockets shalt be laceted along the 'bc:k" sides of buildings 1, 2, and 3 and planted with a fast growing vine. E xhibi[ "A" 6~ PLANNING COMMISSIO. ESOLUTION N0. Development Review 87-20 - Lennon Architects July 8, 1987 Page 2 4. The applicant shall attempt to coordinate with San Bernardino County Flood Control District relocating the eastern asst driveway on 6th Street to accamagdate a shared access to the adiacent channel to the east of the project site. Engineering Division: 1. Overhead Utilities a. 6th Street - The existing overhead utilities (electricai coawunlcation and electrical, except for 66 K.V. electrical) on the prolect side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded from the 91rst pole an the west side of Turner Avenue to the first pole off-site east of the Deer Creek Channel prior to public improvements acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical cammunlcatlon and electrical) on the project side of the street minus those (telecammunicatton) an the opposite side of the street is feasible because the property 1s currently undeveloped. Turner Avenue - M in liven fww ae rnnfnlhuN nn ~~ ~h. future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecaaaminication and electrical) on the opposite side of Turner Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of bull ding perwits. The fees shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the property from the center of Sharon Circle to the center of 6th Street. 2. A stor>. drain pipe shall De constructed along Turner Avenue and the existing channel eliminated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of said stop drain pipe shall De detenained Dy the City Engineer. 3. The project shall be protected free flood flows entering the stte from Turner Avenue tc the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Notice of intention to forty and/or ,)a1n the Lighting and Landscaping District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or lssuan~e of building perwits, whichever occurs first. 5. Street improvements on 6th Street shall De constructed to extend to the existing bridge to the east. ~~ PLANNING CDlMISSIOA cSOLUTIDN N0. Derelopaent Review 87-20 - Lennon Architects July 8. 1987 Page 3 6. A drive approach and pavemont wt thin the Flood Control easesient shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Flood Control D1strlct. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS BTH DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COfMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONBA I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the PUnning CaaaNsslon of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regulariy introduced, passed, and adopted by Lhe Planning Caaasisslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular aieeLing of the Planning Caa~isslon held on the 8th day of July, 1987, by the following mote-to-wit: AYES: CpMISSI0NER5: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY. CHITIEA, EMERICK, HCNIEL nUii. 1.111'lI1JMVNGNJ: nunL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~0 ^~ i `r 0 z ~-- u z a =7. ia;%~~ Ey ~S. 8f_^ SE~ ~ - aoi'gf tt l~~9gE~r Sfr Sy <SSy 52 ~gJ ~YSa.~ ~9^ ~I`yi`x ~E°~LE: Y33: ~~s~S ;ss €s~=a ;fie i~x~,y~a~y~ ~E~4Y a~~ Y§pyg i~_ ~ _g;s?s= ~O~ES gi~s_ ~gs 's^~ile ~.:ii~ ~ s gig;'=; d__Yt r -~ti s~ s:~-~ ~ c_e?oa:~E:e_ diai3 i~a =c~~~i Asia e „~ ~°3 !i x a b 4 N a ~ ~ a M '8 ~ .~ ~ !yE°."b Y ~~ I tl ~ a~ .$6°fiY f ~ Y y- .Y:~ma ~ig a g ~, joss ,$3 ~ ~s3 I k 3e 3e=-~;ti~ ?~ia ~ - i~ ~~s~s:zs~ e ~aE i ~s l~~~e'^~= S M #'pa ` ~ 'b ~~l~i-~~i : ~ ~ ~, s: ~ - ~ ~s= .~~~ ~ a~ ; . _ \J a ~~ ~ ~ ~~ T~ ~ \ 6~ r f- U W O a - a• = e'a eY~ a ._ `` ° ~. ~gg3 - .EI 1~9~ ~~~;$ 9;L ~ xa ~~ ~_aa ~=- °si; ~'-s€s zSoi_~~Je~~ ~~r€~~!E xY6 ~ azg~` ;€ € .a ~"•"M_ as ix:`'..8 °32":EB ip gg4: 28 TY .•~W ~~~-5 ~;QY?~~~=' ~?':;~_~# s-~" -~ ;egg' ~& ~e~gd S:y~ €!~,~s~J$`gk~ iJ~f~a s S~~F 3~ e:~i3 °g: ~i?i~ ~>?$~ ,-s~3gce:~lx~ a fpii~a~i ig=i }1~ ~z~9i 31~ - =~ rl of ~ N~ ^) i NI u SASE 3a 8p. tY eY ~~ -g `ifry - afY a _^ E3e 'Y g l_ akNg r= dPs 3fig: x; ya~ -~F9 y^ lad °'- ~„~ _ -- ~f ~ Y °$ae ea S~ " _:a ~ ry ea y:x ~~ .°s° E ~ eso •gY<~ gad ."6~0 ^I E:_ ¢~ ~""?~s~=Y ~~` ~F Y ~;~51l. ... }i =! ~ Y~'ib l..1 R![ Ik YI Yf~yY'~6~ a -~ ~Yi ~F =- `Y gy°°~ i;= 9"9t9 f!j ;~ i~a lal ~s~ fY7 jY„ 3g ~'kg_8 ~;~ ~~ F8 ~siij44,~pg, ^g Y83 ~ ~~:- ° i _eYS Yid ~ ;_:~~1'i~g zl ~ ;~i ~ ays.~Ela x -_.~_= g ~ °I ~ I ~ 9 ~b~~F ~SY~^ i"e. Yx~"C -~-~a gag.Y~ 3/i~~ ~gs~z ~~~a~3 i.?';fie ;~139s ~fSy~Ea~ Y ¢ 6/~Ig~ E FYY~ -~iE. -Yez;Y ~;~w~a ~sr*s~ !lY ~~r~ YY~~3: I y;:h ~h x sE ~~ a§ha:s~zr•s eery s ~`E S. „Los EM1 ,. 'St sa ahfa$m ~f-o `~.E~ F ~.to w 5 °OP Ef Ev~ '~ Zf:i O=~~$QY y~Y fyy_ ~~ `'.:y yg ~ ~F: YrN oh ''f ~R -_~ ~;k~~Y` 'fioR Ef ~fyf a . y: .af~ fX:_ Z 7e ?-f ~2` ; Y^-" z`x-' ibMl ,= €hf y:$ ;9gL~Z~~~~a ~;Bh! ~° ;~~xi .,y°~',; ~? ~ ~~ ef: ?~= ~-;s~al~°~ ~'3,s ;i ;Nays xsi'i `ri <~S ~~= ry! =<hs~~~Eai~~"u~ ~~?~! ~$ ~13az ~ I ~ ~ .~d ~d PI ~d ~ =f y~~ ;~ fi ? is °zsi f~ 3~; a B ~C _ 5 g ~ y ~ 7~ ~_ ~ _wX Y. ~~ ~ ~ 'A [_ L •_ y3 ;~ ~° .tie ~~~t~~C ~' != !~ g ~E f6 G Su 'rid ~$"fY ~.. 7~E ~8 . ty ~S. °y- _. i• fib; - ~h.i yb~i.€~ ; ~ ~ ~ ; ~~Y FS S ~f: " d i l f S g O ^ ~ §{ y !i . } ~ b~ B F.~ LY E g'9$ - `5~ ~$; fi~ 3E Ya ~S~ y'- €.xb e;8 ~``bt :e ~ ~~~ ^ oF ~.: ~+ Y ~ Z e a ~ k e2~x < 3 ~ ~ ~.. ~8 a - ` 33i 9a h W ~~ ~ ~ ~ ry~ '~A ~ „~ J~ jl~ ~I 70 ~ xx ~ l~ tom' ~~ ~§ _s= ~~ i ~~` ~~a 6ciE fi°s Vie; ~ '-i ~ fo°e ffi e s ! ~ - ~; a ~ s ~ X82' g~° C[ "~f ~ ~~ ; : f y i R 5 7 a~ x~~~s ~} Fee ~ j ~ p .60 xa: x g7!- ,~e ``-E ~~' ~! s +J :xr Y WSt "~2 g `S`j et j~~ "~! ty x ~ Y { j1e~E gs~ ~tY LY L t~ Eia~ cf:d ~ ! ~~~.~a . c:f ^I g`; g~7~~'S 3~~Y ~~ ~ x ==fea ~ _ ~s '~°aa '~r~:i b~a - ~E Eg€u: ~g9~ € ~: 9~ F 2 ~'$. F~' I$~Yg S xY :~~~1eZ~j 2;~s~ ~ 5: _°~ s-x~' X Ye fj:: is;_E sbs~~ 4 ' !! Lg 3~jY t$jti /a_i3 yC ~ .x ~6~ld Rp-~f S iS i4~t jf j: 'i.~71j ~ t~ -3„S Ds to pNi E~ij7 ~ Y~F f " .1Y 7 Y r f~Y~ i;ix!fx i~i~a ~ ~ F~j a ~~ ~ ~ W Q °s=s^ i? x°. ' .e asEZ ~ x : q~ ~ ~_. s~ 3e#x g ~ $ s ~ =i~~ =jJ j~1 _ =7 n .~~4 ~- ~ y3X ~_ xx°yfi ~e ~ 6Sj 5f 6>~ -~ ',- F 5 9 d~ Y Fx a~° j~ SSS °~'~ _Y Fx~'g i ~° ~ yb 2 ~~ ~Y 2 . , ~ ~ _~ ~ b Z P 40 z xgr fit: iS ~~ y~s Ys -es ~ ! ~ five =a ea -~ ~ a ~ i$ ~~~ Firms $ sxg a 3~ g= ~?~~ ~ h; ~ Cfr - "e -' ~ ! ~a e g~z = 'p ~~e g ~S ?¢ s~f & ~9 ~~s6 "sj.; ~~ xsx €r ~€~ ~grc 5 $.~fA ~~ ~Xj~ Yj x~ j~~~ 3A'f jh '~S~ Y t . t ~ a k x ~ ! " ~ Yom- ~~_° y 6: ~'" ! '~ ~ ~~~ e~t YS 2~~ - • : ~: ~ ~1 ~ 'V ~ ~ NI 'V "V h ^~ SI /V ~W ~1 r_ 0 s .. w o' 6 !1h i(~a ss R~~ t i r :aYr x s~~ ~x`3g6 YL- e I ~ ~ e I r5is ~ ~!~ _r7~sg ^ia ~ t +yi~ ~ ,F~ ~2'^ss a~x fii p ~ s .~'..E a~ :a= cs+Y~; !r: ~i I a~w = l ~~~a eb e2! o#rt-i ~~~~ ~~ e s I ! .s s itgsc EF 6 7 "a~. =+~ks~3e a s s; iii i iE 3 ~es:= ~; _~_. _ s= t --~_ ~hS_':! _ ~.~F .fit 3 ° 9 3 :~ ' Y_.~i YYIYi ~ ~i ~ ~ t ~ js ~ii~ <:~aa=s a s~j~ °j I I ~s ~ i~ i=r3.: :3 • asi~~ as 53 ~i is ~a~1~~ ci N it EF r ='s s it EC ~ E '/ si ~i i 'E s~ 3i tF ~~ ss s~ s~ ;: ~c s~ s3 Ye ~r jE -J __ _ ~a si z~ sj1 s r~~ ~s ,7 gal W~t #~ "i ~i ~ ~ i~~j s 'e!"i Er a rti! ~3:, /~ e ~ y i ar~ ~ l !s s! ! iDr~~ .~ °~ 4 q r rg~3 s! fir?i ~F -'s H ll~~a~ ~:ie i-ye '3 ~~~l~ i~ !~ i . set: ; I~ ~ ~ \,~~ '~ '4h E 8>;.: rE. =.l!. L iYfi io`e: S~ CQ~ E X S`XYY S - ~ . YBEB FF ~~~' ° gs22° 6 ~ 8 .. ~nw~~ YF"S '= 8ba Y 6[ l6ySY ~ y e y" v ~ ~~ llsE 2 .. 73 8 ` W s~- i~ ii9 _ ~~ .,asr~ ! eY", s Es 3 ~~?? as i-' ~ a~ ma°3 ~ is t ~i a s = ~d I Pl ~ ~ ~ "i ~ ^i - ~ ~d ~- "~ Y :g e 7? Y ~! s:p ~~ '~5 5i ti :9 Y: _'» {=~ Ekk~ Ig ~~ "e gii '~ <e~ ?~ m ~I 4t 4 9~ ~: 4 ~8 % p d~! r~~ sa ~ sjy ~: y r 'f - . 6 !~E aY P ~~: ~~ : Y i8 8i 8 ~~Y ~3 t~ 9i1 :", s ` 1 ~i ~# yy~~! Eh 3~=. [: C8g 8i i»; '- 8~» =F 6„ ~~~ Y~ _b T eP ~g~ ~~ ~~~ 1c h`~ #Y ~xii~ .I~ ~ ~ iE i ":SSim, :: ~~ ~}; ~YA~~ ~~ [[[Ciii S4- t: e~ !~a~ j~~~d i~ s S ~3if' ~9 iij i€j r3tey i~ 3i! t~' i~~'r ij ~t~ 1i~ :,~€: 13 jj€ ~~'a fii~a i~ "~1 ~~ ~~~~e ~„e ~1" i-; t.~~.. gc~ _~i cda \~i3ib .43 ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ r z U W Q.' 4 gY E~ is 3i ,e Ea aF qta T~ as 3E e~ .~ btk Ei: aE` :-a .I a ~;aa -~t ~ ies r s t F. is 'a~° ~'i ~ ~~'" x ~ ~ ~ ~ s~ Eta ~~r ~ 'g~ ~ s a i i ? ~ @s 5~~1 ~E~y Y+'_ ~ r ? it~ J i~ 9Y~ s EE ~~ 7g _1P~ '~£[E£~3 r *iEj _ ~~ ~~ Ee LT~~ 1F 1 ~T ~~. a[ ~S a~ !i a~ aYa~ ~:i' !_ ~~~~ ~a ~~ ~~ .,,,~ ~ ~ 3j' ~ats g' ~EI tb eta ;E1 s s_ _yw ~- -~~ add^!! ~ _ _.: j~l "~ eYS tar ec e ~T !; r1 s c~~~ icy ~?a .;I :I „I RESOLUTION N0. b / - ~ ~ 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN APPLICANT ION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEN N0. 87-20, Fql DEVELOPMENT OF THREE (3) MULTiTENANT AND ONE WAREHOUSE BUILDING TOTALING 66,374 SQUARE FEET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 5, ON 3..8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TURNER AVENUE AND 6TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS RND SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS. (i) Mark C. Boen and John Willett filed an application for Development Review No. 87-20, described above in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as the "application". (ii) On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. 87-118 thereby approving the application subject to all Conditions and Standard Conditions contained in said Resolution. (iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-118 was timely appealed to this Council by the applicants referenced in subparagraph (i) above. Said applicants specifically appealed the imposition a condition of Resolution No. 61-118 described as follows: The requirement for un dergroundi ng of existing utilities (Condition No. I.a. - Engineering Division). (iv) On September 2, 1981 this Council conducted a hearing with respect to the appeal of the conditions of Resolution No. 87-118 and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NON, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1, This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth is the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct, 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Environmental .luality Act of 1910 and concurs with that Negative Declaration issued with respect to the project on July 8, 1981. '7S RESOLUTIDN PAGE 2 3. Based upon substantiai evidence presented to this Council during the above-reference September 2, 1987, hearing, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above referenced Planning Commission meeting and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-118 this Council specifically finds as follows: a. The applicantion applies to property within the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) and is located at the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and 6th Street. b. Ail properties adjacent to the site are located within the General Industrial District. All properties adjacent to the site are vacant except for the property to the east which is developed as an Industrial Park; c. The project contemplates the construction of three (3) multitenent and one warehouse building totaling 66,374 square feet on 3.8 acres of Land. Such a use as contemplated conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is a permitted use within the General Industrial District of the industrial Specific Plan; A. The application has been submitted pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code to allow design review of the proposed use so as to minimize any adverse impact on the visual or aesthetic environment surrounding the subject site and to insure a harnronious appearance of the proposed use in conformity with all applicable local desfgn guidelines, standards and ordinates; e. The appeal to eliminate the condition of Resolution No. 87-118 -zyuirtr~y - a~ y~ ourdL-~y of - iry o ., coy 6 Stra (Condition No. ul. a. - Engineering~Division)~was denied because the requirement is consistent with current Planning Commission policy as contained in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96. The undergrounding of existing overhead utilities contributes to the improved esthetics of the area, and the removal of the requirement would have granted a special privilege to this project. 4. Based on the substantial evidence presented to the Council during the above-referenced September 2, 1981 hearing and upon the specific finding of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code df the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan and the district ir. which the site fs located; and 76 RESOLUTION PAGE 3 c. The proposed use, together with the Conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare and will not be materially ir~{urfous to properties and improvements in the vicinity. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to all Conditions and Standard Conditions as set for forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 87.118 (a full, true and correct copy is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A". 6. This Council hereby provides notice to Mark C. Boen and John Nillett that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution and (b) forthwith transmit a Certified copy of this Resolution, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Mark C. Boen and John Nillett at their respective addresses as per City records. 77 RBSOf.UTTON NO. 87 ~*~ 9 A RESOLUTION OP THH CLTY COUNCIL OP TH6 QTY OP RANClIO CUCAITJNGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN 1NR WEST VALLEY SOLID NASTR COALITION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Coceaonga (^City^) recognizes there eziets en iamine¢t crisis with evaileble land fill for col id waste; and WHEREAS, the City desires to work with neighboring cities in rha real valley to iweatiga to potential vethode to solve the pending aol id teats crisis. NOW, THBItEPORE, EB IT RESOLVED the Citq of Aancbo Cucaaonga deeiraa to be en active participate in the Neel Valley Solid Waste Coalition. ~~ "/ O RESOLUTION N0. 87-327A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION N0. 87-327 AND ADJUSTING SALARY RANGES AND BENEFITS FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NHEREAS, the City Council of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and holiddys and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it competes in a marketplace to obtain quaiified personnel to perform and provide municipal services, and that compensation and conditions of employment must be sufficiently attractive to recruit and retain qualified employees; and WHEREAS, the revised pay ranges and benefits incorporated in this Resolution have been reviewed and approved by a committee of employees composed of representatives from each city department in compliance with applicable state and federal laws. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: SECTION 1: Salary Ranges ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES (Monthly Amounts) M UII ll V 1 Class Minimum Point Maximum Code Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount 00%% CLERICAL AND ADMINISTRATION OOXX Office Assf stant/Clerical 0000 Office Aide 0001 Office Assistant 1/ 0002 Data Entry Operator 0003 Police Clerk 0004 Deputy Lity Clerk 1/ 0005 Sr. Office Assistant 1/ 0006 Public Service Technictan 0007 Office Supervisory 0008 Planning Commission Secyyl/ 1009 Records Managery 1/ 239 1,141 279 1,393 289 1,464 259 1,261 299 1,539 309 1,618 259 1,261 299 1,539 309 1,618 261 1,273 301 1,554 311 1,634 299 1,539 339 1,879 349 1,975 299 1,539 339 1,879 349 1,975 299 1,539 339 1,879 349 1,975 329 1,787 369 2,182 379 2,294 329 1,181 369 2,182 319 2,294 383 2,340 423 2,656 433 3,OU2 * Denotes Management Classes y Denotes Supervisory/Professional Classes 1/ When acting as Clerk to the Ctty Council or City Commissions these positions will be paid E50 per night or weekend day meeting. ~9 Resolution No. 81-327A Page 2 Control Class Mini mum Po int Ma ximum Code Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount O1%X Fiscal ~fOT ~sFi~er/Receptionist 210 1,332 310 1,626 320 1,709 0103 Account Clerk 270 1,332 310 1,626 320 1,709 0104 Accountants 355 2,035 395 2,484 405 2,611 0106 Accounting Technician 315 1,667 355 2,035 365 2,139 0108 Risk Management Technician 315 1,667 355 2,025 355 2,139 0113 Business License Clerk 260 1,257 300 1,547 310 1,626 0115 Business License Technician 320 1,709 360 2,086 310 2,193 0118 Business License Supervisors 350 1,985 390 2,423 400 2,547 0121 Purchasing Assistant 300 1,547 340 1,888 350 1,965 0150 Assistant Finance Di rec tor* 415 2,745 455 3,351 465 3,522 02XX Administrative m strati ve Intern 247 6,85 287 8.36 297 8.79 0210 Personnel Technicians 329 1,787 369 2,182 379 2,294 0245 Administrative Analysts 358 2,065 398 2,522 408 2,650 0247 Administrative Assistants 388 2,399 428 2,929 438 3,078 0249 Sr. Administrative Asst* 418 2,786 458 3,401 468 3,575 03X% Assessment un or Aerator/Programmer 296 1,515 336 1,851 346 1,945 0356 Operator/Programmer 322 1,726 361 2,097 371 2,204 0362 Assessment Revenue Aide 296 1,516 336 1,851 346 1,945 0363 Assessment Revenue Tech. 322 1,726 361 2,091 371 2,204 0365 Cartographers 387 2,387 427 2,914 437 3,063 0366 Assessment RPVPOIIP analyefY iR7 7 QO7 d27 3,uG3 0367 Systems Analyst/Programmers 417 2,112 457 3,384 467 3,557 0369 Resource Center Coord.* 447 3,220 481 3,930 497 4,131 10X% COM1UNiTY SERVICES lOXX Recreation ecreation Assfs~ant 167 4.60 207 5.61 217 5.90 1003 Recreation Leader 217 5.90 257 7.20 267 7.57 1005 Recreation Supervisors 365 2,139 405 2,611 415 2,745 1008 Sr. Recreation Supervisors 395 2,484 435 3,033 445 3,188 11%X Community Services ss stant ar anners 311 2,204 411 2,690 421 2,828 l lfi5 Associate Park Planners 401 2,560 441 3,125 451 3,284 1167 Park Projects foo rdinato r* 431 2,973 411 3,629 481 3,815 !173 Co^imuni tv Services Aide 299 1,530 339 1,879 349 1,975 1188 Disaster Prepared. Coord.s 431 2,973 411 3,629 481 3,815 2X X% PLANNING, ENGINEERING & INSPECTION 20%X Planning 2001- Fl anni ng Aide 247 6.85 287 8.3t 291 8.19 2002 Assistant Planners 371 2,204 411 2,690 421 2,828 2005 Associate Planners 401 2,560 441 3,125 451 3,284 2007 Senior Planner* 431 2,973 411 3,629 481 3,815 2008 Deputy City Planner* 451 3,284 491 4,010 501 4,215 * Denotes Management Classes N Denotes Supervisory/Professional Classes g~ Resolution No. 87-327A Page 3 Class Code Class Title 21XX Engineering 2130 Junior Engineering Aide 2140 Engineering Aide 2150 Engineering Technician 2155 Junior Civil Engineer 2160 Landscape Designer# 2170 Assistant Civil Engineer# 2180 Associate Civil Engineer# 2190 Senior Civil Engineer* 2198 Deputy City Engineer* 23XX Insoection Control Minimum Point Ma ximum Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount 286 1,442 326 1,161 336 1,851 29fi 1,516 336 1,851 346 1,945 316 1,675 356 2,045 366 2,150 357 2,055 397 2,509 407 2,637 371 2,204 411 2.690 421 2,828 397 2,509 437 3,063 447 3,220 417 2,772 457 3,384 467 3,557 447 3,220 487 3,930 497 4,131 467 3,557 507 4,343 517 4,565 2320 Community Code Rep. 347 2327 Community Code Rep. Supv# 377 2343 Public Works Inspector 2/ 366 2345 Sr. Public Works Insp.Ar2/ 396 2348 Public Workers Engineer* 447 2353 Plan Checker# 386 2355 Counter Plan Checker# 401 2357 Sr Plan Checker# 415 2359 Plan Check Coordinator* 446 2383 Building Inspector 2( 366 2385 Grading Spec1a11st,Y3/ 386 2387 Electrical Specialis~# 2/ 386 9iAN Null A: ir~~ c~pw~.~u 'T, e~ 24Xx Development Administration 2445 e even d-vTopmen~ yst~- 401 2450 Sr, Redevelopment Analy st* 431 SXXX MAINTENANCE SERVICES 50XX Field Services 5000 ea sons Maintenance Tech 207 5001 Maintenance Worker 3/ 292 5002 Street Sweeper Operator 3/ 302 5003 Sr. Maintenance Worker 3T 312 5004 Mafnt. Crew Supervisor ~/ 342 5iXX Maintenance Supervlsien 5120 Maintenan~uperv sor 3/ 387 5170 Maint. Superintendent* 37 417 90XX Miscellaneous 1,955 387 2,387 391 2,509 2,271 417 2,172 427 2,914 2,150 406 2,624 416 2,758 2,497 436 3,048 446 3,204 3,220 487 3,930 491 4,131 2,375 426 2,899 436 3,048 2,560 441 3,125 451 3,284 2,758 456 3,367 466 3,540 3,204 486 3,911 496 4,111 2,150 406 2,624 416 2,758 2,375 426 2,899 436 3,048 2,375 426 2,899 436 3,048 , ~ YYV J,LVY Y7U JI JO/ 2,560 441 3,125 451 3,284 2,973 471 3,629 481 3,815 5.90 257 7.20 267 7.57 1,486 332 1,814 342 1,907 1,562 342 1,907 352 2,005 1,642 352 2,005 362 2,107 2,005 382 2,328 392 2,447 2,387 427 2,914 437 3,063 2,712 457 3,384 467 3,557 96 ross ng wards 167 4.60 207 5.61 217 5.90 * Denotes Management Classes k Denotes Supervisory/Professional Classes 2/ Up to 550 reimbursement for purchase of approved saf ty footware. 3/ Eligible for approved safety footware provided annua~ty Dy City. gi Resolution No. 87-327A Page 4 SECTION 2: Executive Management Salary Ranges Minimum Control Point Step Amount Step Amount 2009 City Planner 472 3,647 512 4,452 2339 Building Official 472 3,647 512 4,452 0250 Assistant City Manager 472 3,647 512 4,452 1159 Community Services Dir. 476 3,721 516 4,542 2109 City Engineer 487 3,930 527 4,798 0157 Admin Services Director 511 4,430 551 5,408 2459 Community Development Dir. 527 4,798 567 5,858 0259 City Manager --56,570.00 flat amount-- Executive Management employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% 140 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 15% (30 salary code steps) above the control point. Actual solar within the range is detenni ned by performance, achievement of goals and ob~ecti ves, or for recent appointments, growth within the position. SECTION 3: Three tiered Management Pro ram Emplo ees designated as either Professional/Supervisory, Management or Executive Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory dime for working hours over and above the normal dally work schedule. Employees so designoted shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general employees and the following: Professional/supervisory e, e,~{riStrlt::: lca:c •- - ,-u-~Lawa ui iurLy iwurs per calendar year at the discretion of appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. B. Life insurance policy of an additicnal five thousand dollars. C. Deferred compensation program of two percent of salary. Management A. Administrative leave to a maximum of sixty hours per calendar year at the discretion of appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. B. Life insurance policy of an additional ten thousand dollars. C. Deferred compensation program of four percent of salary. Executive Management A. Administrative leave to a maximum of eighty hours per calendar year at the discretion of appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classlffcatlon. B. Automobile allowance of 5250.00 per month if a City vehicle is not provided. C. Life insurance policy of an additional thirty thousand dollars. D. Deferred compensation program of six percent of salary. ~~ Resolution No. 87-327A Page 6 Except in the case of Christmas Eve Day (i), whenever a holiday falls on a Sunddy, the following Monddy shall be observed as a holiday. Nhenever a holiday falls on a Saturddy, the preceding Friday shall be observed as the holiday. SECTION 6: Vacation All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working days of vacation monthly according to the following schedule: Length cf Service in Years Annual Days Received 1 10 2 11 3 12 4 13 5 14 6-8 15 9 16 10 11 11-13 18 14 19 15t 20 SECTION 7: Health Insurance The City shall provide a health insurance plan for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to pay for ail full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials up to a maximum of E300.00 per employee or elected official per month towards medical insurance premiums through the City's health care Drovlders to be calculated un n wnrywiGe race oasis ana to De effective July 1, 1987. SECTION 8: Dental Insurance The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to pdy for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials up to a maximum of (55.00 per employee or elected official per month towards dental insurance premiums to be calculated on a composite rate basis and to be effective July 1, 1987. SECTION 9: Optical Insurance The City shall provide an optical insurance pi an for all full-time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to poly for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials up to a maximum of f14.60 per employee or elected official per month towards optical insurance premiums to be calculated on a composite rate basis and to be effective July 1, 1987. I~3 Resolution No. 87-327A Page 5 SECTION 4: Implementation of Revised Salary Ranges Tne revised salary ranges in Sectio n 1 and Section 2 for full ti me and part time employees shall be effective July 1, 1987. The r evised salary range s in this section shall be e ffective August 1 , 1987. Cont rol Class Minimum Poi nt Maximum code Class Title S_ tee. Amount Ste. Amount Step Amount 00%X Office Assistant/clerical ice i e 246 1,181 286 1,442 296 1,516 0001 Office Assistant 1/ 266 1,305 306 1,594 316 1,675 0002 Date Entry Operator 266 1,305 306 1,594 316 1,675 0004 Deputy City C1erkM 1/ 336 1,851 376 2,260 386 2,375 0005 Senior Office Assistant 1/ 306 1,594 346 1,945 356 2,045 0006 Public Services Technician 306 1,594 346 1,945 356 2,045 0007 Office SupervisorM 1/ 336 1,851 376 2,260 386 2,375 0008 Planning Commission~ecyNl/ 336 1,851 376 2,260 386 2,375 1009 Records Manager* - 418 2,786 458 3,401 468 3,575 01XX Fiscal ccount Clerk 278 1,386 318 1,692 328 1,778 0121 Purchasing Assistant 308 1,610 348 1,965 358 2,065 0150 Assistant Finance Director* 431 2,973 471 3,629 481 3,815 02XX Administrative ersonne ec nician 336 1,851 376 2,260 386 2,375 0259 City Manager --E6,906 flat amount-- 11XX~~ __C~o~mm~~~unitYY Services fiT3 ~3ervices Afde 306 1,594 346 1,945 356 7.045 50XX Field Services ain enance marker 298 1,531 338 1,869 348 1,965 5002 Street Sweeper Operator 308 1,610 348 1,965 358 2,065 5003 Sr. Maintenance Norker 318 1,692 358 2,065 368 2,171 5004 Maintenance Crew Supervisor 348 1,965 388 2,399 398 2,522 51XX Maintenance Su ervision 3I2(1- 'FTa~n enance upervi sor 417 2,772 451 3,384 467 3,557 5170 Maintenance Superintendent* 447 3,220 487 3,930 497 4,131 SECTION 5: Holidays The City Offices shall be closed on the following days. All full time continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days. (a~ January 1 - New Years Oa IDI February - Washington's Birthday (c) Ma -Memorial Day ((d July 4 - independence Day (e~ September - Labor Day - The first Monday in September (f November 11 - Veteran's Day (gg November - Thanksgivingg Day (h November - The day following Thanksgiving (i) December - Christmas Eve Day - only when Christmas Day, (December 25 ), falls on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday (.7) December 25 - Christmas Day (kl Three (3) discretionary holidays may be taken by an employee who has successfully completed probation at his/her convenience subject to approval of the department head. Discretionary holidays m4y not be carried over from one calendar year to next. ~' y Resolution No. 87-327A Page 7 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADDPTED this 16th day of September 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: enn s ut, ayor ATTEST: every u e e , er t, BEVERLY A. AUTNELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an ad,iourned meeting of said City Council held on the 16th dAy of September, 1987. Executed this 17th day of September, 1987 at Rancho Cucamonga, California every u e e , y er Ba Resolution No. 87-327A Page 8 SCHEDULE I -- SALARY CODE TABLE BASIC PAY SCHEDULE IN HOURLY, BI-MEEKLY AND MONTHLY AMOUNTS ONE NALF PERCENT BETNEEN RANGES MONTHLY AMOUNTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR Ran a u Hourly R t Bi-Weekl t~ Mon~thl~ R t Range A m~ Hou~rly~ R t Bi-Weekl i~t Monthly R to - m er a o a a o u er a o e a a 141. 4.0374 322.9953 700 181. 4.9289 394.3109 854 142. 4.0576 324.6103 703 182. 4.9535 396.2824 859 143. 4.0779 326.2334 707 183. 4.9783 398.2638 863 144. 4.0983 327.8645 710 184. 5.0032 400.2551 867 145. 4.1188 329.5039 714 185. 5.0282 402.2564 872 146. 4.1394 331.1514 717 186. 5.0533 404.2677 876 147. 4.1601 332.8071 721 187. 5.0786 406.2890 880 148. 4.1809 334.4712 725 188. 5.1040 408.3205 885 149. 4.2018 336.1435 728 189. 5.1295 410.3621 889 150. 4.2228 337.8242 732 190. 5.1552 412.4139 894 151. 4.2439 339.5134 736 191. 5.1809 414.4760 898 152. 4.2651 341.2109 739 192. 5.2069 416.5483 903 153. 4.2865 342.9170 743 193. 5.2329 418.6311 907 154. 4.3079 344.6316 747 194. 5.2591 420.7242 912 155. 4.3294 346.3547 750 195. 5.2853 422.8279 916 156. 4.3511 348.0865 754 196. 5.3118 424.9420 921 157. 4.3728 349.8269 758 191. 5.3383 427.0667 925 158. 4.3947 351.5761 762 198. 5.3650 429.2020 930 tCO n !167 353 ° iii. 5.35iY 431.34111 YSO 160. 4.4388 355.1006 769 200. 5.4188 433.5048 939 161. 4.4620 356.8161 773 201. 5.4459 435.6123 944 162. 4.4833 358.6605 777 202. 5.4731 437.8501 949 163. 4.5057 360.4538 781 203. 5.5005 440.0399 953 164. 4.5282 362.2561 185 204. 5.5280 442.2401 958 165. 4.5508 364.0674 789 205. 5.5556 444.4513 963 166. 4.5736 365.8877 793 206. 5.5834 446.6736 968 167. 4.5965 367.7171 791 201. 5.6113 448.9070 973 168. 4.6194 369.5557 801 208. 5.6394 451.1515 977 169. 4.6425 371.4035 805 209. 5.6676 453.4073 982 170. 4.6556 373.2605 609 210. 5.6959 455.6143 987 171. 4.6891 375.1268 813 211. 5.7244 457.9527 992 172. 4.7175 3%7.0025 81? 212. 5.7530 460.2424 997 113. 4.7361 318.8875 821 213. 5.7818 462.5436 1002 174. 4.7598 380.7819 825 214. 5.8107 464.8564 1007 175. 4.7836 382.6858 829 215. 5.8398 467.1806 1012 176. 4.8075 384.5992 833 216. 5.8690 469.5165 1017 111. 4.8315 386.5222 837 217. 5.8983 471.8641 1022 118. 4.8557 388.4548 842 218. 5.9278 474.2234 1027 179. 4.8800 390.3971 846 219. 5.9574 476.5946 1033 180, 4.9044 392.3491 850 220, 5.9872 478.9775 1038 A ro Resolution No. 87-327A Page 9 R~an~e. un tuner Hourly Rate Bi-Neekl Rate Monthl ate Ran a N ~Nourly Bi-Neekl Monthl ~ um er a~ aR to at 221. 6.0112 481.3724 1043 271. 7.7214 617.7095 1338 222. 6.0472 483.7193 1048 272. 1.7600 620.7981 1345 223. 6.0775 486.1982 1053 273. 7.7988 623.9021 1352 224. 6.1D79 488.6292 1059 214. 7.8378 626.0216 1359 225. 6.1384 491.0723 1064 275. 7.8170 630.1567 1365 226. 6.1691 493.5277 1069 276. 7.9163 633.3075 1372 227. 6.1999 495.9953 1075 277. 7,9559 636.4740 1379 228. 6.2309 498.4753 1080 278. 1.9957 639.6564 1386 229. 6.2521 500.9677 1085 279. 8.0357 642.8546 1393 230. 6.2934 503.4725 1091 280. 8.0159 645.0689 1400 231. 6.3249 505.9699 1096 281. 8.1162 fi48. 2993 1407 232. 6.3565 508.5198 1102 282. 8.1568 652.5458 1414 233, 6.3883 511.0624 1107 283. 8.1976 655.8085 1421 234. 6.4202 513.6177 1113 284. 8.2386 659.0875 1428 235. 6.4523 516.1858 1118 285. 8,2798 662.3830 1435 236. 6.4846 518.7667 1124 286. 8.3212 665.6949 1442 237. 6.5110 521.3606 1130 287. 8.3628 669.0234 1450 238. 6.5496 523.9674 1135 288. 8.4046 672.3685 1457 239. 6.5823 526.5872 1141 289. 8.4466 675.7303 1464 240. 6.6153 529.2202 1147 290. 8.4889 679.1090 1471 241. 6.6483 531.8663 1152 291. 8.5313 682.5045 1479 242. 6.6816 534.5256 1158 292. 8.574D 685.9170 1486 243. 6.7150 537.1982 1164 293. 8.6168 689.3466 1494 244. 6.7486 539,8842 1170 294. 8.6599 692.7933 15D1 rob, b. /823 642.683b 11/6 295. 8.7032 696.2573 1509 246. 6.8162 545.2965 1181 296. 6.7467 699.7386 1516 241. 6.8503 549.0230 1187 297. 8.1905 703.2313 1524 248. 6.8845 550.7631 1193 298. 8.8344 706.7535 1531 249. 6.9190 553.5170 1199 299. 8.8786 110.2872 1539 250. 6.9536 556.2845 1205 300. 8.9230 713.8381 1547 251. 6.9883 559.0660 1211 301. 8.9676 717.4019 1554 252. 7.0233 561.8613 1217 302. 9.0124 720.9949 1562 253. 7.0584 564.6706 1223 303. 9.0515 724.5999 1570 254. 1.0937 567.4940 1230 304. 9.1028 728.2229 1578 255. 1.1291 570.3314 1236 305. 9.1483 731.8640 1586 256. ].1648 573.1831 1242 306. 9.1940 735.5233 1594 257, 7.2006 516.0490 1248 301. 9.2400 739.2009 1602 258. 7.2366 578.9292 1254 308. 9.2862 742.8464 1610 254. 7.2728 581.8239 1261 309. 9.3326 146.6114 1618 t50. 1,3092 584.7330 1267 310. 9.3793 750.3445 1626 261. 7.3457 587.6567 1273 311. 9.4262 754.0962 1634 262. 7.3824 590.5950 1280 312. 9.4733 X57.8667 1642 263. 7.4193 593.5479 1286 313. 9.5207 /61.6560 1650 264. 7.4564 596.5157 1292 314. 9.5683 165.4643 1659 265. 7,4937 599.4982 1299 315. 9.6161 769.2916 1667 266. 7.5312 602.4957 1305 316. 9.6642 773.1381 1675 267. 7.5699 605.5082 1312 311. 9.7125 771.0038 1684 268. 7,6067 5G8.5358 1318 318. 9.1611 780.8888 1692 269. 7.6441 611.5784 1325 319. 9.8099 784.1932 1700 210. 7.830 614.6363 1332 320. 9.8590 788.7172 1709 ~~ Resolution No. 87-327A Page 10 Range N b Hou~rl R Bi-Weekly R Monthly R t Ran a N Hourly R Bi-Weekly M~on~t~hlY R um er ate ate a e um er ate Rate a to 321. 9.9083 792.6608 1717 371. 12.7145 1017.1628 2204 322. 9.9578 796.6241 1126 372. 12.1781 1022.2486 2215 323. 10.0076 800.6012 1735 373. 12.8420 1027.3598 2226 324. 10.0576 804.6103 1743 374. 12.9062 1032.4966 2237 325. 10.1079 808.fi333 1752 315. 12.9707 1037.6591 2248 326. 10.1585 812.6765 1761 376. 13.0356 1042.8474 2260 327. 10.2092 816.7399 1770 377. 13.1008 1048.0617 2271 328. 10,2603 820.8236 1778 378. 13.1663 1053.3020 2282 329. 10.3116 824.9277 1787 319. 13.2321 1058.5685 2294 330. 10.3632 829.0523 1196 380. 13.2983 1063.8613 2305 331. 10.4150 833.1976 1805 381. 13.3648 1069.1806 2317 332. 10.4670 837.3636 1814 382. 13.4316 1014.5265 2328 333. 10.5194 841.5504 1823 383. 13.4987 1079.8992 2340 334. 10.5720 845.7581 1832 384. 13.5662 1085.2987 2351 335. 10.6248 849.9869 1842 385. 13.6341 1090.7252 2363 336. 10.6780 854.2369 1851 386. 13.7022 1096.1788 2375 337. 10.7314 858.5080 1860 387. 13.7707 1101.6597 2387 338. 10.7850 862.8006 1869 388. 13.8396 1107.1680 2399 339. 10.8389 867.1146 1879 389. 13.9088 1112.1038 2411 340. 10.8931 871.4502 1888 390. 13.9783 1118.2673 2423 341. 10.9476 875.8074 1898 391. 14.0482 1123.8587 2435 342. 11.0023 880.1864 1907 392. 14.1185 1129.4180 2447 343. 11.0573 884.5874 1917 393. 14.1891 1135.1254 2459 344. 11.1126 889.0103 1926 394. 14.2600 1140.8010 2472 39 ]. 11. lOtlC tl93. 4]]4 1Y30 39 ]. 14.3313 1140.6U]U 24tl4 346. 11.2240 897.9226 1945 396. 14.4030 1152.2375 2497 341. 11.2802 902.4123 1955 397. 14.4750 1157.9987 2509 348. 11,3366 906.9243 1965 398. 14.5474 1163.1887 2522 349. 11.3932 911.4589 1975 399. 14.6201 1169.6076 2534 350. 11.4502 916.0162 1485 400. 14.6932 1175.4557 2547 351. i1.5075 920.5963 1995 401. 14.7667 1181.3329 2560 352. 11.5650 925.1993 2005 402. 14.8405 1187.2396 2572 353. 11.6228 929.8253 2015 403. 14.9147 1193.1758 2585 354. 11.6809 934,4744 2025 404. 14.9893 1199.1417 2598 355. L1.1393 939.1468 2035 405. 15.0642 1205.1374 2611 356. 11.7980 943.8425 2045 406. 15.1395 1211.1631 2624 357. 11.8570 948.5617 2055 407. 15.2152 1217.2189 2637 356. 11.9163 953.3045 2065 408. 15.2913 1223.3050 2650 359. ii, 9759 958.0711 2076 409. 15.3678 1229.4215 2664 360. 12.0358 962.8614 2086 410. 15.4446 1235.5686 2617 361. 12.0959 967.6757 2091 411. 15,5218 1241.1465 2690 362. 12.1564 972.5141 2107 412. 15.5994 1247.9552 2704 363. 12.2172 977.3767 2118 413. 15.6774 .254.1950 2717 364. 12.2783 982.2636 2128 414. 15.7558 1260.4660 2731 365. 12.3397 987.1749 2139 415. 15.8346 1266.7683 2745 366. 12,4014 992,1108 2150 416. 15.9138 1273.1021 2758 367. 12.4634 997.0713 2160 417. 15.9933 1279.4676 2772 368. 12.5257 1002.0567 2171 418, 16.0733 1285.8650 2186 369. 12 5883 1007.0669 2182 419. 16.1537 1292.2943 2800 370. 1.6513 1012.1023 2193 420. 16,2344 1298.7558 2814 Y ~ Resolution No. 87-327A Page 11 Ran a ~ Ho~urlyy t Bi-Week( lt~ Monthly Ram' ~Ran9e mb Hou~rly~ R B~i-Neekl IC Mon~th(~ R r Tia :e Nu er ate to a a to 421. 16.3156 1305.2496 2828 471. 20.9366 1674.9299 3629 422. 16.3912 1311.7758 2842 472. 21.0413 1683.3016 3647 423. 16.4192 1318.3341 2856 413. 21.1465 1691.7211 3665 424. 16.5616 1324.9264 2871 474. 21.2522 1700.1197 3684 425. 16.6444 1331.5510 2885 475. 21.3585 1708.6806 3702 426. 16.7276 1338.2081 2899 416. 21.4653 1717.2240 3721 427. 16.8112 1344.8998 2914 477. 21.5126 1725.8101 3739 428. 16.8953 1351.6243 2929 478. 21.6805 1734.4392 3758 429. 16.9798 1358.3824 2943 479. 21.7889 1743.1114 3771 430. 17.0647 1365.1743 2958 480. 21.8978 1751.8269 3796 431. 17.1500 1372.0002 2973 481. 22.0013 1160.5861 3815 432. 17.2358 1378.8602 2988 482. 22.1174 1769.3890 3834 433. 17.3219 1385.7545 3002 483. 22.2279 1778.2359 3853 434. 17.4085 1392.6833 3017 484. 22.3391 1787.1271 3872 435. 17.4956 1399.6461 3033 485. 22.4508 1796.0627 3891 436. 17.5831 1406.6449 3048 486. 22.5630 1805.0431 3911 437. 17.6710 1413.6781 3063 487. 22.6759 1814.0683 3930 438. 17.7593 1420.7465 3078 488. 22.7892 1823.1386 3950 439. 17.8481 1421.8503 3094 489. 22.9032 1832.2543 3970 440. 11.9374 1434.9895 3109 490. 23.0177 1841.4156 3990 441. 18.0271 1442.1645 3125 491. 23.1328 1850.6227 4010 442. 18.1172 1449.3753 3140 492. 23.2484 1859.6758 4030 443. 18.2078 145fi.6222 3156 493. 23.3647 1869.1752 4050 444. 18.2988 1463.9053 3172 494. 23.4815 1878.5210 4070 +CS. iu.3>"u3 1471. [G40 3ioo 4Y5. t5. D9tl9 ltltl/.9136 4090 446. 18.4823 1478.5809 3204 496. 23.7169 1897.3532 4111 447. 18.5747 1485.9738 3220 497. 23,8355 1906.8400 4131 448. 18.6571 1493.4037 3236 498. 23.9547 1916.3142 4152 449. 18.7609 1500.8707 3252 499. 24.0745 1925.9560 4173 450. 18.8547 1508.3751 3268 500. 24.1948 1935.5858 4194 451. 18.9490 1515.9169 3284 501. 24.3158 1945.2637 4215 452. 19.0431 1523.4965 3301 502. 24.4374 1954.9901 4236 453. 19.1389 1531.1140 3317 503. 24.5596 1964.7650 4251 454. 19.2346 1538.7696 3334 504. 24.6824 1914.5888 4278 455. 19.3308 1546.4634 3351 505. 24.8058 1984.4618 4300 456. 19.4274 1554.1957 3367 506. 24.9298 1994.3841 4321 457. 19.5246 1561.9667 3384 507. 25.0545 2004,3560 4343 458. 19.6222 1569.7766 3401 508. 25.1797 2014.3778 436d 4~9. !9 72'!3 1577.5254 3413 504. 25,3056 2024.4497 4386 460. 19.8189 1585.5136 3435 510. 25.4321 2034.5119 4408 461. 19.9180 1593.4411 3452 511. 25.5593 2044.7448 4430 462. 20.0176 1601.4083 3470 512. 25.6871 2054.9685 4452 463. 20.(171 1609.4154 3487 513. 25.8155 1065.2434 4475 464. 20.2183 1617.4625 3505 514. 25.9446 2075.5696 4497 465. 20.3194 1625,5498 3522 515. 26.0743 2085.9474 4520 466. 20.4210 1633.6775 3540 516. 26.2047 2096.3172 4542 467. 20.5231 1641.8459 3557 517. 26.3357 2106.8590 4565 468. 20.6257 1650,0551 3575 518. 26.4614 2117,3933 4588 469. 20.7288 1658.3054 3593 519. 26.5998 2127.9803 4611 470. ).8325 1666.5969 3611 R 9 520. 26.7328 2138.6202 4634 Resolution No. 87-327A Page 12 ~R~angye u~ H~ourl~yy Bi-Weekl l~ M_ont_hlY R t Range Aum~er Hourl 1~ B~i-Week_ly ~ Monthly lt-a~ r a~ a o a 521. 26.8664 2149.3133 4657 571. 34.4757 275E.0543 5976 522. 27.0007 2160.0599 4680 572. 34.548'- 2771.8446 6006 523. 27.1358 2170.8602 4704 573. 34.8213 2785.7038 6036 524. 27.2714 2181.7145 4727 574. 34.9954 2799.6323 6066 525. 27.4078 2192.6230 4751 575. 35.1104 2813.6305 6096 526. 27.5448 2203,5862 4774 576. 35.3462 2827.6987 6127 521. 27,6826 2214.6041 4748 577. 35.5230 2841.8371 b157 528. 27.8210 2225.6771 4822 578. 35.7006 2856.0463 6188 529. 27.9601 2236.8055 4846 579. 35.8791 2870,3266 6219 530. 28.0999 2247.9895 4871 580. 36.0585 2884.6782 6250 531. 28.2404 2259.2295 4895 581. 36.2388 2899.1016 6281 532. 28,3816 2210.5256 4919 582. 36.4200 2913.5971 6313 533. 28.5235 2281.8783 4944 583. 36.6021 2928.1651 6344 534. 28.6661 2293,2876 4969 584. 36.1851 2942.8059 6316 535. 28.8094 2304.7541 4994 585. 36.9690 2957.5199 6408 536. 28.9535 2316.2719 5019 586. 37.1538 2972.3075 6440 537. 29.0982 2327,8592 5044 587. 37.3396 2987.1691 6472 538. 29.2437 2339.4985 5069 588. 37.5263 3002.1049 6505 539. 29.3900 2351.1960 5094 589. 37.7139 3017.1154 6537 540. 29.5369 2362.9520 5120 590. 37.9025 3032.2010 6570 541. 29.6646 2314.7668 5145 591 38.0920 3047.3620 6603 542. 29.8330 2386.6406 5171 592. 38.2825 3062.5988 6636 543. 24.9822 2398.5738 5197 593. 38.4739 3077.9118 6669 544. 30.1321 2410.5667 5223 594. 38.6663 3093.3014 6702 5^5 2:22. ui i~ G245 555. 36.H5YP 31UH. /6 /9 6736 546. 30.4342 2434.7326 5275 596. 39.0539 3124.3117 6769 547. 30.5863 2446.9063 5302 597. 39.2492 3139.9333 6603 548. 30.7393 2459.1408 5328 598. 39.4454 3155.6330 6837 549. 30.6930 2471.4365 5355 599. 39.6426 3171.4111 6811 550, 31.0474 2483.7937 5382 600. 39.8409 3187,2682 6906 551. 31.2027 2496.2127 5408 552. 31.3587 2508.6937 5436 553. 31.5155 2521.2372 5463 554. 31.6130 2533.8434 5490 555. 31.8314 2546.5126 5517 556. 31.9906 2559.2452 5545 557. 32.1505 2512.0414 5573 558. 32.3113 2584.9016 5601 .;;a, 32 a72g 2597.8261 5629 560. 32.6352 2610.8152 5657 561 32.7984 2623.8693 5685 562. 32.9624 2626.9886 5713 563. 33.1272 2650.1736 5742 564. 33.2928 2663.4245 5771 565. 33.4593 2676.7416 5800 566. 33.6266 2690.1253 5829 567. 33.7947 2703.5759 5858 568. 33,9637 2717,0938 5881 I 569. 34.1335 2730.b793 5916 l ~ 570. .3042 2744.3327 5946 (~d ~ v nc n e win vn nrrn w unwrn w ., Vv~....V~ STAFF REPORT ~~' 9.~ r LL ~ A F" ~ Z J` Date: September 16, 1987 ---~q__ To: Mayor and City Council From: Historic Preservation Commission By: Paula Pachon, Administrative Assiatant~ Subject: Recommendation of City Historic Landmark Designation RECOlRSHNDATZON: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends City Historic Landmark designation for the Goerlitz House located at 6156 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 (Assessor's Parcel Number 1062- 381-08). BACKGROUND: As a part oP the City's on-going_Historic Survey the house located at the above referenced address has been identified as historically significant_ Lo the community based upon two specific criteria. These era: architectural design and cultural arts/leisure rnmmunity ovnnts that havo nrrnrroA at the site. On September 3rd, 1987 an advertised Public Hearing was held to hear testimcny and determine the merit of this house for possible recommendation of City Historic Landmark designation. Architecturally it has been determined that the house is a single story structure of wood and stucco construction. Its design is unique to Rancho Cucamonga being Italian Renaissance with Beaux Arta influence. This house was built by W.C. James for Charles F. Thorpe and his family. This was the Thorpe's home from 1902 until 1910 when it was sold to Ernest Goerlitz. Mr. Goerlitz was the manager of the Metropolitan Opera Company in Naw York until he retired and moved to the area on the recommendation of Captain Peter Demene. over the years the home was the site of many elegant parties that included opera stars of the 1910-1920 era, such as Caruso and Galli-CUrri. 9~ Goerlitz House September 16, 1987 Page Two Based upon both the architectural significance of the house and the significant community/cultural events that occurred at this site, the Historic Preservation Commission respectfully requests that City Historic Landmark designation be granted for the Goerlitz House. PZ:be cc: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Historic Preservation Commission v~ RESOLUTION NO. 870 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE GOERLIT2 HOUSE IACATED AT 6156 HELLMAN AVENVE AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has adopted Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historic preservation; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission has investigated the historic significance of the Goerlitz House and has held public hearings concerning this site in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historic preservation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: Tha City Council finds and determines that the Goerlitz House located at 6156 Hellman Avenue, has mat the criteria established for designation ea a City Historic Landmark, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates this Bite as a City Historic Landmark. PASSED, September, 1987. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: APPROVED. and AnOPTF.n *Ma isth,~~i, ..c Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk 93 Cicy of Rancho Cucaaronga Applic atlan for HISTORIC LANDYARg DESIGNATION N 15TORIC POINT OF INTEREST OES IGNATION X HSstoric Landmark Hlstor is Point of Interest IDENTIFICAT [ON 1. Coon Name: Unknown Z. Historic Name, it known: Goerlitz Npuse 3. Street or Rural Adtlreas: 6156 Hellman Avenue City: R h C a Zip: 91701 County: San Bernardino Assessor`s Parcel No. )062-381.08 Zone: Le gnl Description: 9. Present Owner, St known: Grav Ronald 6 Adtlrase: 6156 Hellman Ave mfg' City: Rancho Lucaovnca 21p: 91701 Own erahip Ss: Public private % 5. Present Vae: Residence Original Uae: Residence Other pant YSe9' DESCRIPTION e, Dr le tly describe the present h sic al a earance o[ the site or etructu re and describe any mador a tern lone rom its original condStlon: A t al t t t re of wood and stucco construction of ItaN a issa <e destpn with Beaux Arts influence Raof is very iow AiD 1th conpo 1t shirolez Hui [l pie fireplaces with peaked caP and arched VenLS. North 51d! Df hDUSe hdS arched parapets (Continued - See attachment) T. Location sketch map (draw A label S. Approximate property size: site and surrounding streets, Lot Size (Sn [set) roads, and prominent landmarks): Frontage Dapen ? Nver a or approx. acreage 9. Condition: (chock one) ii ~.nNYAN n. Ex cellent_ b. Good % --~-- ,-' - c. Fair- d, Deteriorated- ~~struu are: e. No longer Sn exlatence_ u: 10. [s the feature: a. A1LeredT % yeses.,n (See attachmen'6T- ~Z b. UnalteredT ~ 11. Surroundings: (check more than 5 one 1t necessary) ~ , a. open land ___ b. Residential X [ c. 3c altered buildings % d. Densely built-up_ i ~y 19 LA sr. 12. Threats to Site: •. None known % b. Privflta development_ c. Zoning_ d. Public ilorks ProdecL_ e. Van dal iam_ f. Other_ 13. Dates of enclosed photograDn(9) NOTE: The follow inR (Items 14-19) are for st tortures only. 14. Primary aaterlor building mat erlal: a. Stone_ b. Brick_ c. 3tuc oo X d. Adobe_ e. flood % t. Other 15. Is the 9Lructure: a. Oa Sts original site? % D. Yoved7 c. Unknown? 16. Year of Initial Construction: 1902 This Date Ss: a. Factual b. Es tlmated % 17. Architect (if known) 18. Builder (it known): M. C. 19. Related Features: a. Barn b. Carriage house c. Outbouae d. Shed(s) e. Formal Gardeo(e) f, wlndm 111 g. Ratertower/tankhouae_ h. Other i. None % SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly afore hl at orical and/or •rchltecturnl importance (include tlatea, euchre, and persona nssocint<d with tee site when kncwn ): this house was built by Y. C. Jares for Charles F. Thorpe and his family. This was the Tho roe's home frmn 1902 until 1910 when It was sold to Ernes[ GoeN ltz. Yr. 6oerli tz was Che manager of the Metropolitan Opera Company in New York until he (Conti hued -- See Rttachment) 21. Ya In theme oY the nlaLOric resource: (check only one): e. Arcnltecture 2 D. Arta t Leisure l c. Economic/Indu st rlal d. Government e. F.aplo ration/Settlement [, Mil ita ry g. Religion h. Social/Education 22. Soa tees: Liar booker dot uments~ su rvey9~ pe raonfll Sn tervleae~ and their tlates: i un A ses Re. of Alf n n ?~. Date -__ prepa red Aac 12°.' °7 foam.}: /' Address: 38{7 6 QN/CCIQJ BLt~ City: OpgpW Zip: 9/76L a Phone: 7/4~5!/-.t/ip/ __ __ Organtzatlon: 1\~ ATTACNNENT Goerlitz House DESCRIPTION (Continued) 6. with ornamentation. Early photographs shoe this treatment extended around the entire structure. Nindows appear to be multi-pane 41th wood trim, Lintel and large wood gill. Door has lower wood panel with cross brace end rectangular glass. Side lights on both sides, no transom, porch is of concrete with straight stairway, Porch roof is plain, porch supports are square wood pillars with aolld panels belov re ilinga. Early photographs show a large covered porch wiM arched ped Sment and ornamentation, massive square outer supports with Roman aryls columns. Early accounts indicate that there vas an open courtyard in the center oL building that was later roofed over by the second owner. ALT£1tATI0N5 30. Removal of parapets on front of house antl over porch. SIGNIFICANCE (Continued) 20. retired due to ill health and moved tc callfornia. It was on the recommendation of Captain Pater Demene that Mr, Goarlitz move to the area. The house waa built around an open court with potted pylma, ferns, and a Lountaln and the parlor dining room and several bedrooms opened up onto Ghe court. When the Goe rl itz~s OaughC the home, Hrs. coati Ltz had the courtyartl roofed over. The home was the site of many elegant parties that included various opera stars of the 1910-1920 era, including Caruso ana Galli-CUtrS. Mr. Geer lltz health continued to fail and in 1916 ha committed suicide; his wife kept the property until 1920, since then it has keen owned by many different families. SOURCES 22. ^ M /~ STAFF REPORT ~~~~, ~.~ Q ~ ~ DATE: September 16, 1987 ~ $ ,~ i~~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Rpproval of Improv~iaent Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 86-21 located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Hillwood Development Comparry itECOM1ENp1TI0N It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subJect agreement and securfty and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND OR 86-21 located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, in the Heavy Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 27, 1987. The Developer, Hillwood Development Company, is submitting an agreement and -it;• ;TiC:c Ccrtificltc ^` Dcpc;it) t^ gcr~~tcc t,`,c ..m~...r~cticr cf the off-site improvements in the fallowing amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: =8,000 Labor and Material Bond: (4,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe tf s bmitted,r i R Attachments 96 RESOLUTION N0. ~ 7 -S~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW M0. 86-21 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on May 13, 1987, by Hillwoad Development Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specificaily described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Jersey Boulevard; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described Tn said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in coniunctian with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 86-21; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement ggreament on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~-{-~ 97 w I~'i~! Na --- `-~------- U -- w ~ ~ --- I ~~#i z e3 w Z -~-- JERSEY BLVD ~ V N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D.R. 86-21 ENGINEERING DMBION ~/~ ----- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA~IOtiGA ~ ~cc.v_vLr4ti ~ STAFF REPORT 3` ~ e ' . ~; _ Date: September I6, 1987 x _ ~~ ~r ~ z To: City Council and City Manager - - ~;r- ~ ' From: Russeil M. Maguire, City Engineer By: Lucinda E, Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineers Suoj ec t: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Eunice P. Swanson and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 9760 Arrow Route RECBMMENDATIDN: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Eunice P. Swanson and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACK6RWNU/ANALYSIS: The attached subject Agreement between the City and Eunice P. Swanson provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights and •treet pavements along the Swanson Arrow Route Frontage. Mrs. Swanson has agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement W allow fnr the wt denf ng and improvement of Arrow Route in return for the con strnc tinn of coin ;morn vcmcnre Said street improvemen is will be constructed in conjunction with the City's Arrow Route Phase I Street Improvement, Project from Archibald Avenue to Turner Avenue. Respectful ~ submitted, /,,~ ~~ /jam /' ~-1-~! s+-~T-~.. Attaclimertt---~ J 99 A9tEENENi FOR INSTALLATION ff PUBLIC IIB'NOYFIENi AID DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1981 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Eunice P. Swanson (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER") for the instaltati an of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights and street pavements along a portion of Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (i) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along the north side of Arrow Route from Archibald Avenue and Turner Avenue (the "Arrow Route Protect" hereinafter 7n this Agreement). (ii) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 208-291-03, fronting along Arrow Route which property is within the limits of the Arrow Route Protect and described as follows: The West 128 feet of the East 307 feet of the North 290 feet of the South 330 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 oY the Northwest 1;4 of Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West (iii) OWNER desires to participate in the Arrow Route Protect so as to dedicate necessary Rights-of-May related to street frontage improvements along its property at 9760 Arrow Route ("the Swanson Portion" hereinafter). CITY is willing to include the Swanson Portion within the Arrow Route Protect upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NON THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between C[TY and OWNER as follows: 1. OWNER shall execute a Deed of Easement in favor of CITY for street right-of-way and related purposes in foam and content identical to that a irac~<c he re to as Exhibit "A" 2. CITY is authorized to cause ONNER's Deed of Easement to be recorded forthwith upon execution of this Agreement and City shall furnfsh copy of the recorded Easement Deed to the OWNER upon recordation. -1- /GD 3. CITY shall include the Swanson Portion as a part of the construction of the Arrow Route Project and shall cause all necessary public improvements to be installed in accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. 4. OWNER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and contractors such rights of entry and/or temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the completion of the Swanson Portion. 5. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 7. This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefits of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 8. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY PROPERTY OWIIER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation Eunice P. Swanson enn s _. tou ayor ~~ -- ATTEST: ~~~ ~~.., APPROVED AS TO FORM: every ut e e ty ., er y orney /r7/ -2- "D '~D -14S:7ERi9G 17.41 '.J ' aE..OPCEG PE TURN ,O • 93]3 Baseline Rd., Ste Ilu Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~.^PNEr rLP rv.m•i Corse zva tot Judy K. Matthews (ENOpRSEDt SUPERIOR COUR7 OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ~ -' •' ~F~~~ ~1 E ~ s'nE E'r .pORESS 1540 N. Mountain Ave. ~ 19--~Eea~c Q IOpg v.. vc ,cLRESS same ~y -""u~ ..~avo nvcwE Ontaz io, CA 91762 ~ ~~' ' 9R.vcR V•uE West End BYpEpM. MApy T. CONSERVATORSHIP Of (NAME)' '~, t--•~~ai EUNICE PAULINE SWANBUNr _ conservatee LETTERS OF CONSERVATORSHIP usE N,;ueER -- ~Person i](Eslate Climlletl Conservalorahlp L CPW 490 i GOR RELOROEP 5115E ONLY STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1 ;X, (Name) JUDY K. MATTREWS ~s Ine appointed (~ conservator ;'~ Ilmdeo conservator of the ~2,•' person L~ estate o! (name) EUNICE PAULINE BWANSON 2 _, (lo/ conservaforsnrp loaf was on Oecemoer Js, 1980. • yueroremnrp of an adult o/ of lne person O/a malrted minOl) (name): was appointeo the guardun of Ine ~ person ~; estate by order ' doled'. entl Is now Ine conservator of the i j~ person L: eetab Of (nime): 3 CY. Otner powers nave been grantetl or con0lnons rmposetl as followr a .,J exciusrve autnonry to give consent for and to repwre the conservatee to receive medmal treatment that the conservator m good ladn Dosed pn medal atlv:ce tlelermines to De necessary even n the conservatee Oblepte, i suolect to me Ilmuanpns staled in section 2356 of the Prooate Code -.~ TNS Irearmenl shall be performed by an accredited practihaner of the relig10n whose IenEtS and pnciices Call for reliance On prayer 810ne for healing pI which the conservatee was an e0nerent prwr IO the establishment of the canservatorsnip _,_, lappucavw omY n Ine cvun orae/ rrmrrs Ine puranpn) i ms memcal autnonry terminates on (pate) 0 ~, powers to D¢ eaerased inoepen0ently under section 2590 of the Prooate Code as spealied in attacnment 30 (specify powers, resfncfmns. condrfmns. and Iwrfanons). c .~,,, contlitiong relaong fo the care an0 custOOy of NB property unoer section 2W2 of Ine Prooate Cone as specitie0 in attacnment 3c d ._ = cpnn:eons relating to the care. treatment, etlucanon, ono welfare of the conservatee unoer section 2750 of the Pro Date Cooe as specihetl m attachment 30. e ~ (for Irmrteo conservaforsnrp only) powers of the hmnetl conservator of Me person unoer section 2351 S pl the Probate COOe ae epBClhetl m dttdChmenl 3e I ^, (for hmdeo consenefprsMp only) powers of Ine amlteo conservator of the estate unoer section 1830(b) of Ina ProOete Cooe as speubetl m attacnment 31 g ~~ other lspeuN) ,SEAL II l ~n o~m ,. o•~aao~e~a ,• o rnu.~me•nn,•m Dated:. .JUly2~, 1986 Clerk, Dy ti~~'r• )IOONTY , Depu' [~ Num0e1 0l pagts attached 2 d On reverse) R:0 ol1M ••NI• •• R,RrkM in ••clwn eels RI ma R•e0•u caa• _ ,.,___I~,TTER4 OF CONSERVATORSHIF Coda 372a..J31 Oetand on ACIS Dy I /O l o•m ARe,a.•a o. ,n• L.m..•. councn a ca~ra•• EII•<,ne unuvr 1 196 cc noieq u lest. t ".T ORSHIP OF (NAME) +5[ rv.4e[a PAli LINE SWAN SON Consen+aleel` CPW 490 LETTERS OF CONSERVATORSNIP vaae t AFFIRMA710N rm) atlum that 1 will perform the Oube5 0l [-)( consenator ~ LmiteO conservabr accor0ing to law tea on (pate) July .9,1986. .,at (prate). P4roond,. CA -~~ Isw"~aein~«i JCDY K. TAATTHEiQS rco~rnr q)nu 'ily Ndt Ines Oocuminl an0 eny atlechmenls is a correct copy OI ih¢ onginel on lile In my oPocl, antl That the i55ueo Ic Ina person eppointeo above nev! not Dean r¢yokeo, annulletl. Or set es~tle. antl ere Sh II in lull IOrp! .Weer ~` ? 0 ~"-' Clerk b~ ^ ~ __~r,~'~'_! .bOals~ `~\\\\\\\1111111 lOR '4) ~ ~~~~j CO q~~ .'`.'.~'C'~,~ ~.': t. J y ~~~. 6 EH.' CR_ ~, , Ao ~'~ouH~ . .' In. , ,.,. !03 C ;~54%d ;TCPSH:P CF 5~'9 ICE ='~J; i'_E S'nA9SCN Case No. C?n-.9C AttacSr~nt to Letters Appointing Conservator 3 b. C:dar relating to the powers and duties of the Co^.s~rva *_or of t'ie Estate under °action 2590 of r;;e Pn:'ate C 9e be grant 'd as set f^rth belc'd: (a) The propert es of the Conservatee to +h ich the Conservator is entitled to possession and management is real property held as the co r.^.unity property of the Conservatee and her deceased husband. (b) The power to ask, demand, sue for, recover, collect and receive each and every sum of money, debt, account, legacy, bequest, interest, dividend, annuity and demand (which now is or hereafter shall become due, owing or payable) belonging to the said Conserva- ' tee, and to use and take any lawful means for the recovery thereof by legal process or otherwise, and to execute and deliver a satisfaction or release- therefor, together with the right and power to uomoro- .mise or compound any claim or demand; (c) To exercise any or all of the following Dowers as to .~ '^ _ p:opc: t•;, any :^ ::r 2't U. .ciu auuiur euy uuiid- ing thereon; to lease~th e~same cfor any term oc purpose, including leases for business, residence, and oil and/or mineral development; to sell, exchange, grant or convey the same with or without warranty; and to and to mortgage, transfer in trust, or otherwise encumber or hypothecate the same to secure payment of a negotiable or non-negotiable note or performance of any obligation or agreement; fd) The Dower to employ attorneys, accountants, investment counsel, agents, depositaries and employees, realtors and to pay the expense of same. Attachment b. Letters of Conservatorship /0 y r r CONSERVATORSHIP OF EuNICE FAULINE CA NSON Case No. CPIs-430 attachment to Letters A.. pointing Conservator 3 c. Orders relating to the powers and duties of the Conservator of the Pecson of Conservatee pursuant to S.action 2402 of the Probate Code be qra nted as set forth below: (a) To care, feed and clothe Conservatee and provtde a residence for her. tb) The contractual or other obligations which the Conservator may incur on behalf of Conservatee such as purchasing clothing, food and personal items, '- for the benefit and enjoyment of said Conservatee. Attachment 3 c. Letters of Conservatorship ~Q~ -~RLa p.oUT° - .._ . MaapagNa aaoumae aY Chy of RaoMO Cyycamonaa rNa aapoapap awy ro City of Rancho Cueamonpa P.O. Box ROl Rancho Cucamooaa, CA 9173p MAd Aan11 TIla1 uwa ply aawnpav eM EASEMENT FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, reuipa of rhich is haeby acknorhRlaed. DRAM(S) to the City of Ranch CucanwRaa, • Muawryv CorpanWn, an EASEMENT for R OAONAT PURPOSES m, ova and upon 1Mt certain rd properly N yhe CLLy of Rancho Cuumonp, County of San Bernardino. Slue a( GBfyrmia, DoeAbed u FOBOra: The South 10 fee[ a/ the Mest 12B feet of the East 307 feet of the North 290 feet if :- South 730 feet of the Southwest l/4 of the Southwest l/4 of the NorMwest 1;3 of Seca r lA, TownsMp 1 South, Range 1 Nest, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the :puny of Ss' Be rnardl no, Sta Le of California, according to Unl ted Stdiea Oovernnen[ 'ownsnip ~`:- thereaf. Deed ~-_(~. ~. y ~ 7 ... ~~ Yi,_~/.... - OENlRAL AC NOWLRDOMai~/T~ ~'^~"`--~^`' " Rble n, •~.::/ yaw. ._ ~ on torn lne Oey of _. _ 19 ne'v^^'< ss Ine un4arppned Nalary PUOlit oenonelly appq,ea pagMlly 11nn Wn 10 m1 . nmraa l0 ma on lna tNR0 of wluNOOry enamtt Io Of IM Wroanlalwnoaa namNal su0sfn[.n ~-.ne Wnmmmlr,;mam.ana xanownaeea Tool e.ec„'. Wli NE55 my nano ana annual aea ~Q TRIG IRA GCwaMt ACRNna NolaryafrpnaWre f -ve '.R. 2~ ~I c! 4 J ~_ _ _ 9 OC i 1 3 n B v~ 4 a I ~ N y MULE l~'GO~ I V ~- .}y CJTwCT ~ ~~r}TRO!/ROUTC ` -SC COTNC . , .- ~ v/r/iY xc/i ~, / , , 3l/~r NMh~ ~ SLY G/NC Ol 3/J//Y O/ 5N//y Or NN//y RzY Of 3Ui/Y a~ 3/J~I O/NU~y O/ ,lee./, r/3, R>//, 30aEry E.YH/B/T ~3 /09 _.. _-i.... tt l'i. .. _ __.r ... -..~ ...-.J^53r _.. _-J. iUPERIOR COURT Of CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF' ~~'+~~ ~-'~~•~^ -- '~ -r._-._ :._s,. Cad _ ._ - - ___._. _. _- byoECUTY_N.L:7 T. NC:P.e: r san a;ee __ ~~---_-"LETTERS OF CONSEFVA70aSHIP --_--==sa ..vsEa _v i c'Person -=iEState -LimiL~C~nserva!orship ` 5?~', Gc C4L:cOPWA COUNTY OF SARI vE: n::A3OIVO k-,':dTel JC'OY K. hL-.T:HEKS sine dppanteo :i c.-sE".amr = ;ed r_rse". a:or pt Ine y person ~ estate of ''"el C:;VICE ?AC'L I::'n SY;A[:50~ 2 _ 'ror Ccns E'.alorsnrp rl'ar nas On GecemGer ]l, 1980 a 9uard:ansb'p o/ an apulf ar a"ne ce•son of a malr'ea mrno0 ,name) ads dpp0~'.;ed ;M1e'~bdf d'dn OI (ne _ pe'S0a -_ estate by order ;aced and 's row the Conservator of Ine pesos - es!ate of f r.amel 3 ~, ~;ra' :cue's ndvB peen ^y'arJeC J' .p^CdiJns imposed as IOllOws a ._ _¢WS',ve a:.'r onty !o gwE consent lOr and !c redwre :^e corservalee to eecewe ^',eC ca! ;r=atm ent I^aI 'ne Conservator m yppd lash Gazed on P,':3~ dC~':e Co•..•m'r es tJ Ce'?Ce55d'Y 2vEn J I^e ]C^Sorvdt^e Jb~ecla ..Li9C: ;J :"e '.m'3: G^i 3'a^, r SECiGn 2?$fi OI !hB a•n,^,dIP ^ `AP .. "^ 5 ;rea•-B^' s^d'~ :e ].; rl Jrm oC bV an aCCreCite: p•iCf ; Oner GI Te e y'p. n'~:SE '. _ i J"v' p!d CI'~Ces Cd:l IOf 'PI dnCC On JrdYer diOne 10f 'jai^y :' A^;,^ '. :J^se'. d'Pe bd5 3r d.Y^?'PnI pn01 IO IFZ e5;db",5nm ant Ol ;ne COnSeh dlG Bn'.C _ ._ :dJ a JrJy J •_n ::u/1 J/CEr em ry Ine dWdr:Onl r'S me('i'~.d. d'.Iln OhfY Ie'^"-d;Ei :~ :d'e. [ y_:_ ?s'C pP <. a.: 1_. CBpB^CPnPr ~nCe'SeC;-0^2'3p 01 !re ~rJdd'e !.pCP d55:e 'PC r3r•3C •_a^. baS.',PPry p^wP'S 's'S V~CnOns COnO'frOnS dnd llm~rallcn SJ av .. .-5 'e at rJ ". Ine C3•e and caste Cy o"^a prc0erty .^de' seGOn 2dC2 '"e ? cca'? C.._ -, ._.. -_ _ __ meat JC , _ .. ~ - ~^P care I•ealment educa; Gn arC eeha•e 01 Ine cor ser~alee under secnc^ : JSB ^ c0a~'~ :._e as saeuhed .n anacnme^! 3C .. ._ ,: ^ser.arc •sn'p only) ec ears or ;ne rm,•eC -onsa•. d;o' n!'rve :: e'son rude' sac ,;r ; Y ' -' Pca'? :re as s:~•cl~ed r. at'acnment 3e ' ^ 'eC :J^se'rarC'i1:,0 only, pCwerS OI Ine m.'eC ]v'S2rrdi C• :r !rP es'd'e ~^C2' sP. C' c" ' °J'J C "^.a!e .n.^ ds 5^.PC ;'e': ^ d;;d Cnm enl j' ~a~ Ct Oaten Ju:y~ ( i386 Clerk by ?IIgT 't`, ~lA l' _ ... Y.'+umber GI aa';es aracred 2 _ rrr.. ~~^:. Ed .~ .. e'sel er _. LE 7TER5 OF CONSERVATORSHIP ^il'~ '" ACTS ~E •red on Af lS Oy l /~ o ^.le 372a7'~%3l O LET'. EnS OF CO NSERYA70R5 HIP ~' „ . AfFin MATION ~ .- , - ^. a' n ~, __ _ :nZ ,.,. es J. _ __ ee .dlOr -_ - . _ wry: ,,;y e. _. r _« E,:__,:.. _n cage' J'al_°, 138c at (o~a~e1 -cao^3. C~ ,' ..q,,,,..,.r~o~ .. . "d' •• , ~.. .^' dnC d'v 3"3C'^"3 5 3 '.O••u C Ca.^.y 0• „p p• q ^d~ ~^ l _ mY .e 3-: a '. - P'S '-.... _n.5]' 3C:.. "PC app'.a ^d.P. ^e. Deer` 'evC n2^, dri0a eC. Jr i2' ae~_c d~~ d'2 5'„ .. _v JUL 3 U / ~ " % ~ i ~' =a',e~ ~ggg C'~er. oy ' r:;.r:~:t11''~. G' ,~ ~" i~er_^r ~~,~. ~ • ~ ~'. r~T.._ , • H ~ KJ - y y e , ~l w _ , . \~ ~\ _. _. /~/ i ]`:5??'v '•.TCRSHIP CF 5''I `IiCE 2 VE S.:?.":SON case No. L?:i-;>C A ttac:nn~n[ to T.e tiers Appointing Conservator 3 h. C.der relati r.g to the Dowers and ;u[ies of the Conservator of t~~e Estate un9er -~ection 2590 of the 2rc'ate C 3e 'oe gra .[.d as set f^rth beicw: (a) The orooert 's of the Conservatee to ~h ich the Conservator is entitled to .>o session and management is real property held as the cc-munity property of the Conservatee and her deceased husband. (b) Tha power to ask, de~na nd, sue for, recover, collect and receive each and every sum of money, debt, account, legacy, h+quest, interest, dividend, annuity and demand ('..hich new is or hereafter shall become due, owing or ~a gable) belonging to the said Conserva- tee, and to use and take any lawful means for the recovery thereof by legal oroc ass oz otherwise, and to execute and deliver a satisfaction or relea se_ therefor, together with the right and power to compro- mise or compound any claim or demand; (cl To exercise any or all of the following powers as to - U prcpa.t}, o:.r ... e~o~L Li,e~eiu auvi ua euy buiid- ing~thereon; to lease the same for any term or purpose, including Leases for business, residence, and oil and/or mineral development; to sell, exchange, grant or convey the same with or without warranty; and to and to mortgage, transfer in trust, or otherwise encumbez or hypothecate the same to secure payment of a negotiable or non-negotiable note or performance of any obligation or agreement; (d) The Dower to employ attorneys, accountants, investment counsel, agents, depositaries and employees, rea hors and to pay the expense of same. Attachment b. Letters of Conservatorship ~~Q rCCSFdb'ATnRSHIP OF EiiNICE 7AC__S e' :F V~pN Case No. C?t9~-;30 .ttac`,„,-,•ent to Litters ;,: ,i nting C~nsi r,•ator 3 c. Orders relating to the powers and duties of the Conservator of the Person of Conservatee pursuant to S.~ction 2402 of the Probate Code be granted as set forth below: fa) To care, feed and clothe Conservatee and provide a residence for her. (b1 The contracCUal or other ob Iigations which the Conservator may incur on behalf of Conservatee _ such as purchasing clothing, food and personal items, for the benefit and enjoyment of said Conservatee. Attachment 3 c. Letters of Cons=rvatorship /// RESOWTION N0. O /'JL/~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM EUN [CE P. SWANSON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME, WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to estaolish requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the Arrow Route Phase I Street Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights and street pavements located at 97u0 Arrow Route, to 6e made part of the Arrow Route Phase I Street Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, Eunice P. Swanson has agreed to dedicate Right-of-Way as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. `il_ /~.]/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OpTE: September 16> 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development ~ c~>c^nro,~ '~ ~' ' r 0 0 1'- $ z U 1917 SUDJECT: CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING COUNTY PRE-TRIAL DETENTI N FACILITY The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) attached to this staff report represents all the points of discussion between the City, Agency, and County regarding the relocation of the County pre-trial detention center from the Law and Justice Center site to one at the southeast corner of the City. This Memorandum of Understanding memorializes the points of understanding between the City, County and the Agency, and is consistent with City/Agency policy direction. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Memorandum of Understanding. fully pubmttted, Jack Lam, A1CP Oi rector of Community Development JL/jr Attachment //3 MEMORANDUM OF UNDF,RSTANDING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REGIONAL PRE-TRIAL DETENTION FACILITY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN'1'HE COUNTY OF SAN HERNARUINO, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGF'.NCY, AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ARTICLE 1 PARTIES AND DATES This Agreement entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this day of September 1987, between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"), and the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body ("Agency"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City"). A K'I'IL'hE II Rb:C19`ALS Section 2.1 Agency is presently undertaking a program under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et sea•)* for the redevelopment, replanning and redesign of certain noncontiguous and blighted areas within the City with stagnant, improperly utilized and unproductive land known as the Rancho 1edevelopment Project ("Project")and requiring redevelopment in the i merest of the health, safety, and general welfare of people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Ordinance No. 166 adopted by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on December 23, 1981, as amended, which authorizes Lhe redevelopment of an area within the territorial limits of the City by the Agency. `All suh,equent references, unless otherwise noted, are to the California Health and Safety C de. , ..~ Section 2_2 County, Agency, and City have previously entered into an agreement on February 21, 1982, entitled "Agreement Regarding Rancho Redevelopment Project Area (Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency)", and certain amendments thereto (the "Agreement"), pursuant to Sections 33401 and 33445. The purpose of the Agreement is to assist in the financing of certain regional facilities which Agency and City have found to be of primary benefit to the Project and For which there is no other reasonable means of tinanci ng. Section 3.3 County, Agency, and City pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Agreemeat, as amended, wish to provide Cor certain reimbursements to County in order to facilitate redevelopment within City and to further provide for the cooperation of County and Agency in carrying out redevelopment activities by financing the construction of certain public improvements appurtenant to and of benefit to County's pre-trial detention facility to be located in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Fourth Street. Section 2.4 Agency has found and determined that it would be appropriate to pay money u; the County which shall be used for the construction of public improvements which are regional facilities and of primary benefit to the Project and by otherwise assisting in the financing of County's pre-trial detention facility. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE 111 AGENCY R6IMRURSEMENTOP'000N'fY Section ;f.l Yursuent to Section 4.1 of this Agreement, and this Memorandum of Understanding, Agency shall provide sufficient funds to reimburse County W enable County to construct and install utfsite water, waste-wateq gas, telephone, electrical ,and cable TV improvements necessary to operate and maintain County's pre-trial detention facility, provided such reimbursement shall notexceed $1,000,000 (One Million Dollars). //S County shell submit invoices to Agency for expenditures subject to reimbursement and Agency shall reimburse County for such expenditures within sixty (60) days thereafter. Section 3.2 City shell have the right to exercise preliminary site development review of the pre-trial detention facility as such review relates to and concerns the integration of public improvements so as to insure public safety and access. City's Planning Commission shall also have the right to informally review County's site development master plan and building designs for such facility in a manner consistent with such body's review of County's law and justice center. County shall cooperate with and assist in such review process. AR'1'ICI.h I V '1'RRM This Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective upon execution by all parties. All rights and obligations under the terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Understanding shall terminate in the event the Agency's right to claim and receive tax increment pursuant to Section 33670(6) ceases. ~/6 C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A7"f EST: ity er A'1"fEST: RANCHOCUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY hairmaa APPROVED ASTO FORM: +~-- ecretary au o ~n _ ~...,, ~_..~td4~c~~~l~/ COUN'fYOF SAN HERNARUINO Date airman Board of Supervisors A'I"f EST: ~~ 7 ,... ~~ Mp'lG` STAFF REPORT ~~' ~. 1 ~ l F' I. :+~i4 197i DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: OFF-SITE SUBDIVISION DIRECTIONAL SIGNS I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council set a pu c ear ng date of October 7, 1967 to consider the proposed ~ amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission. II. ANALYSIS: On April 1, 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 309~i rich established regulations for off-site subdivision directional signs within planned communities. On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission reconsidered how the provisions of Ordinance No. 309 would apply to the Victoria Planned Community. The Commission supported the concept of allowing planned communities the ability to prepare a sign program with greater flexibility than what is currently permitted subiect to Commission approval and directed staff to oremare an amendment The >ewe,~nt: it Avec.~FM briefly below: A. Number of Signs Permitted: Ordinance No. 309 allnws a maximum of six s gn pane s o ead a customer to a site. The Commission recommends that Ordinance No. 309 be modified to require the submittal of a sign program for off-site directional subdivision signs subiect to the approval of the Commfsslon. The sign program would include the detailed design and placement of each sign and sign structure. ~ B. Use of Fla s: The Sign Ordinance allows a maximum of six flags n con unc on with a sales office. The flags must be displayed in the immediate vicinity of the sales office and must be located outside the public right-of-way. The William Lyon Company desires flags along their maior entry roads, such as Victoria Park Lane or Mf111ken, because their models are located interior to Victoria. The Planning Commission believed that the existing Yictoria monument signs and BIA directional sign structures located at their mayor entry roads provided ample notice to prospective buyers that there a'e homes for sale within Yictoria. Flags were also found undesirable within public right-of-way because of the potential for liability, maintenance and enforcement problems. I/8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPoRT RE: OFF-SITE SUBDIVISION DIRECTIONAL SIGNS Septeober 16, 1987 Page 2 Resp fully s~ fitted, s Br 1 City anner BB:DC:ko //9 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c~o~ STAFF REPORT ~' Date: September 16, 1987 ~ To: City Council and City Manager ~~~ _E!I From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer °'.-__ 1977 By: Blane N. Frandsen, Senior Ctvil Engineer, ;~..~ Subject: Set Public Hearing for October 21, 1987 for the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to Condemn a portion of certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 9611 Hillside Road for the purpose of contracting Hillside Road from Malachite to Archibald Avenue RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the setting of a Public Hearing for the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire the subject right-of-way by way of a Condemnation or Eminent Domain action. On May 20, 1987 and June 3, 1987 the City Council reviewed and approved the Environmental review and issued a Negative Declaration for Hillside Road Sta rm Drain and Reconstruction Project. It was noted in the report of May 20th, that right-of-way would need to be acquired to complete the intended improvements. Since this time, staff has continued to meet with the owner of said property and have had an appraisal prepared to assist in the subject acquisition. We have yet to reach a settlement in the acquisition and would seek Councils direction Tn acquiring the property by Eminent Domain. We would seek Councils direction at a Public Hearing on October 21, 1987 for the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity pertaining to acquisition by Condemnation of a frontage dedication varying from 17.11 feet to 30.43 in width to match existing dedications on the west and east of the Ewen property. To date, offers have been to exchange right-of-way for improvements. The current appraisal estimates would indicate the property value at 39,788.75+ value of existing improvements at f23,382.50, for a total of 333,000.00. The intended improvement project would replace the majority of the lost imprnvemen is with improvements at an estimated value of 322,850.00 plus new street improvements valued at 331,326.00 for a total expedit~re by the Cfty for improve^~ents at the Ewen property of 560,176.00, Rn estimated betterment of (360,176,00 - 333,000.00 327,176,00) 327,176.00 to be realized in the exchange of improvements for right-of-way ~ZO sTAFF REPORT Public Hearing for Hillside Road September 16, 1987 Page 2 In an Eminent Domain proceeding, the City will be required to pay the Ewens the value of the land taken along with the value of lost improvements. Those improvements replaced would not be considered in the accounting for the Eminent Domain action, leaving an estimated minimum settlement for the land and lost improvements as 59,788.75 for the land and (662.00 in lost improvements for a total of (10,450.25. As part of the improvement protect, those costs of new frontage improvements considered eiigi6le for a 1911 Act Assessement have an estimated vaiue of f37,326.00. Because the City, having previously exchanged right-of-way for improvements to other owners along this reach of Hillside, to reach that same level of fairness in the compensation for the dedications or exchange, the City would need to exercise the 1911 Act in at least an mmount equal to f10,450.25. The ability to assess the full cost of improvements valued at 137,326.00 is witATn the power of the City Council. City staff would advise the Council to proceed with the scheduling of the Public Hearing for the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity pertaining to an Emtnent Domain action, such hearing to be scheduled for October 7, 1987. This is recommended to demonstrate intent and to avoid further delay in the protect shouid a negotiated settlement not be reached. The nm~nnAtn~e nmfa/n/nn ~-n M~ 1011 ~,CL ..fill i -1 ar re a~i~e uYleU IUI' Llltl ~m11B meeting to follow the Public Hearing for~the Resolution of Necessity. It fs to be noted that negotiations will be continued in an effort to reach an amicable settlement Respe u fitted, ~^ Attachments ~~~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT EIEM PROPERTY COST ESTIMATE Oate: 9-4-87 By: an13T a G~Fra~sen N0. ITEM pUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Land Value from L.S. S 9,788.75 Appraisal Lost Improvements 1 Ea 75.00 Pepper Tree Avocado Tree 1 Ea 75,00 Italian Cypress 1 Ea 75.00 Oleander Bushes 25 Ea 437,50 S 662.50 VALUE OF TAKE 510,450,25 Items to be replaced Hater Reservoir and piping L.S, 520,000.00 Fencing L.S. 750.00 Eucalyptus Trees 27 Ea 2,025.00 f22,775.00 Items proposed for Replacement Hater Reservoir and piping L.S. 118,100.00 Chainlink Fencing L,S. 750.00 Eucalyptus Trees 40 Ea 4,000,00 522,850.00 /,~a- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT EVEN PROPERTY COST ESTIMATE Date:9-4-87 By: Slane N. Frandsen N0. UNIT ITEM UAQ NTITY UNIT PRICE MgUNT Yalue of New Improvements (eligible for 1911 Action) Embankment F111 351 C.Y. S 10.00 S 3,510.00 Roadw4y Excava- tion 86 C.Y. 5.00 430.00 Preparation of subgrade 7238 S. F. 0.20 1,448.00 Curbs d Gutters 261.6 L.F. 9.00 2,355.00 Drive Approach 578 S.i. 3.50 2,023.00 Driveway Trans- ition 36 Ton 40.00 1,440.00 Street Surfacings Curb Lane Aggregate Base 350 Ton 20.00 7,000.00 Asphalt Con- crete 403 Ton 40.00 16,120.00 Street Lights 3 Ea 1,000.00 3,000.00 437,326.00 Misc. Incidental Expenditures to be covered by the City Tree Removals 27 Ea 200.00 5,400.00 Removal of P,C.C. Tank 121 C.Y. 30.00 3,630.00 S 9,030.00 i as nrmv nn n ~ vnrrn nrrn, vnvn STAFF REPORT _ 's a > 8 DATE: September 16, 1987 ~m T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~. FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Alan Narren Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEYELOPMENT DISTRICT amen n o c ange a eve oilmen s r c es gnations for those properties aiong Foothill Boulevard to reflect land use changes of the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan, I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests a public hearing be set before the y ounc on October 7, 1987. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: M amendment to change the Deveiopment s r c es gna ons from the existing deslgnatlons to Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (F. S. P.) for all prpperttes ayacent to Foohill Boulevard fray Grove Avenue to the Deer Creek Channel and from the I-15 Freeway to East Avenue within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area. TT i. DIInMC_c nC rur n,n, • ~~u'~nlna: un 5epcemoer 16, 1987, it is an c pa e a .....e. y ouncil will approve the Foothtil Boulevard Specific Plan. fie existing Development ptstrict deslgnatlons will need to be changed as a result of the land use amendments contained in the Specific Plan. Res tfully s fitted, Br City anner BB:AN:ko ~~~ ---- CITI' OF RaVCHC) C:CC~~IOtiG.1 ~„~t~, STAFF REPORT ~~' ~ ._- '~~_ z ~/ ~~., - DATE: Sept ember 2, 1987 _,~~~' T0: City Council and City Manager ~° j FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SU63Ef.T: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13416 - WILL A ERTY CON UL ANTS - Appea o the P anni ng Comm ssion's cision requiring the preservation of an existing Magnolia tree, the un dergr oun ding of existing overhead utilities, and [he construction of finish floor elevations along Hellman Avenue above 100 year flood level for a residential tract subdivision of 37 single family lots on 9.1 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - APN 208-111-04 rteco~mm~a: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the project. if, after receiving all public input and testimony, the City Council concurs with the rernmmen datinn of tho olann;~~ r„mm; .~;.,., ~,,.,;,, of the a .. --~~ ~__._., __... _. ppe al would be appropriate. Ii. BACKGROUND: On June 10, 1987, the Planning Commission unanimously approved Tentative Tract 13476. As part of the approval for the tract, ~ondi~ions consistent with City standards and policies were imposed. Three of those can di do ns are now being appealed by the 3ppl icon[. These conditions pertain Lo Un dergraun di ng existing overhead utilities, ... Flood protection along Hellman Avenue, and '. The pr cs er va t`.on c" an exi;tiny idagnni;a tree, "he Developer's appeal letters are attached as Exhihit "R", I ~- _ ~~J City Council Staff Report TR 13476 - .H illi ams Property September 2, 1987 Page ? IIi. ANALYSIS: A. Under qr oun di nq Overhead Utilities: The project was required to underground the existing overhead utilities along Hellman A•ren ue adjacent to the project frontage in accordance with standard Planning Commi scion Poiicy. The Developer will have to bear the full cost of the undergrounding, because the property an the opposite side of Hellman Avenue is presently developed. The issue was discussed at length by the Planning Commission and it was determined that there were no particularly unusual circumstances associated with this development to wary ent a waiver of the policy provisions. As a point of clarification, staff has estimated the cost of the un dergro unding to be 5226,000 versus the 5275,000 stated by the Developer. Staff's estimate is based upon the standard costs provided by the Utility Companies. The Developer has offered to make a payment of 82,000 per lot or 574, OOD to the City instead of un dergroun ding the utilities. This would not be consistent with the policy; therefore, staff would not recommend such an arrangement. B. Flood Protection al onq Hellman Avenue Hellman Avenue is subject to large quantities of storm water run off during heavy rainfall. Several residents expressed concern for flooding at the Commission Hearing. The area along Hellman is designated as a flood hazard area (Zone A) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA ). City Ordinance X240, which was adopted to be in canplian ce with FEM4 regulations, states that the lowest habitable floor of residential structures shall be elevated above the 100 year flood water level. Therefore, staff has required that the pads adjacent to Hellman Avenue he so elevated. Based upon, the drainage study provided by the Devel opens Engineer, the aad5 are required to be elevated ahmit 3 fart ahnve Hotiman Avenue. ~~/ City Council Staff Report TR 13476 - Williams Property September 2, 1987 Page 3 Elevating the pads adjacent to Hellman Avenue causes an excessive height differential betxeen the pads and the curb for the internal Street "B"; therefore, the Grading Committee re comnen dad that Street "B" be raised so that a maximum height difference of 5 feet was abt ained. The developer is concerned with these Iwo requirements due to the additional expense of imparting earth. The Developer is r_questi ng that he be allowed to construct the pads along Hellman Avenue to a height at or below that of the top of curb and protect the site with a flood protection wall contrary to Ordinance 4240. Staff feels that the developers request is unacceptable for the Following reasons. 1. It is in violation of City Ordinance 4240 and FEM4 regulations. 2. A wall is susceptible to tampering by unsuspecting homeowners. 3. A wall is susceptible to damage Fran floating de bri s. It is noted that if the site is protected as recommended by staff, staff would support the developer if he were Co request to FEM4 that the site be removed fran a Flood Zone A designation, which would eliminate the requirement for the future homeowners to acquire flood insurance. ?he Planning Commission supported the re quir anent to raise the pads along Hellman Avenue because of the ordinance re quirenent and the past history of flooding along the street. C. Preservation of an Ezi sting Magnolia Tree ;n conjunction with the submittal of the Tentative Tract Map, the applicant submitted a Tree Removal Permit application for the rrr.ova'. of eight ;8; trees on site. An Ar!wri st's report ~a~ City Council Staff Report TR 13476 - 'Ailliams Property september 2, 1987 Page 4 was submitted with the tree removal permit which indicated that all but one of the trees, the Magnolia on lot 13, should be removed due to their poor condition., The Magnolia tree, however, is in good condition and Dr eser vation is possible. Based on this information, the Planning Commission required the Magnolia tree to be preserved in keeping with the intent of the tree preservation crdinan ce ;Crdi r.an ce #?15? for heritage trees. The original grading plan suhmited by the applicant indicated that the Magnolia tree could be preserved with normal grading of the site. With the requirement of the building pads for lots 1 and 10-14 being elevated one foot oho ve the flood level, however, preservation of the Magnolia tree requires special attention. The new grading for lot 13 results in the Magnolia tree being located in the middle of a slope bank which could prove disadvantageous to the long term retension of the tree. In order to eliminate the extra dirt around the base of the tree, retaining walls could be installed to create a tree well around the tree. This would still allow adequate use of the front yard area. if the City Council, however, determines that the circumstances surrounding the de velopnent of the tract do not justify preservation of the tree, the tree preservation ordinance requires repl acenent of the Magnolia tree with the largest nursery grown tree avariabie a> ueL e, ..,.ucu L~ City Planner or Lhe Planning Commission. The appropriate condition of approval should be incorporated into the Resolution. R es pe ctfu su yi tted, / ' RHM:3R w Atachmen is Exhibit "q" - Aope al Letters Exhibit "B" -Utility locations U.^.de^gr gun di ng Pnl iry Res nl uti on Planning Commission Minutes Planning Cummi ssion Staff ReporC ~~8 WEST VENTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY August 11, 1987 Mr. Brad Buller Director of Planning City of Ranrho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Tract 13476 Dear Hr. huller: On the referenced tract the planning commission has required the undergrounding of the poles on Hellman in front of our tract. 1b comply with this, we must underground from the first pole on the south side of Tryon St. to the first pole to the north of the tract, a total distance of approximately 950 feet. We have contacted So. Cal. Edison as to the cost since they will be doing the work, aril we were told it would cost 5275 per foot plus engxreerrng, etc. 'That would bring the cost to over 5275,000. tlrrther, Edison would not give us a date for installation ~.~~~~ o~imii 1~u5 u~ uuc receive any priority. To absorb 5275,000 over 37 lots (57,432 per lot) is totally unecongnical along with all the other conditions the City now insists on and will force us to abandon the project. Please note that in the condi eons it is pointed out that [he opposite srde of the street is developed and there can be no reimbursement of any costs. Ih is 9t tract is an infill development along Hellman, a street tha*. has been substantially built up for years. '[he balance of the street will probably never be undergrounded and the portion rFOresented by our tract would lie vnsignificant. ire propose that rn lieu of undergzoundi nq our tract, we pay an amriunt rf 52,000 per lot or 574,000 to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to use rn a nrore advantageous place such as where new 5900 SE JLNrOA „gOULEVARO ~ SUITE '104 O• VAN NUYS. CALIFORNIA 9t4t t • (St Bj 908-9505 / a 7 '~ r r ' f- ire it ~ r ~ Mr. Brad Buller August 11, 1987 Page 2 development has left pxkets of lines to be undergrounded. Although $2,000 per lot is still a very costly amount, we offer this in the spirit of compranise so that the project may proceed and all will benefit. Very truly yours, Lou Berkowitz General Partner LB/mh 9' D _, w ~ WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS, INC. ~." -'>'E=~~-a .618''. -955"62 ," _ _ 265 NO!iTN SAN C-A6RIEL DOULEVARD, PASADENA. CALIEOfiNIA 91107 ~~"may, Our Reference No. P492-1301 ,~°'~'~ ~'- :is ~ r/ ,tune 16; Ise? CmpFBpNCNOCUCAMp!-~ cERTTPleo' '/~ ADMIN1STRaT10N RETURN RECEIPT ~~ city cocnc;I ,fUN181987 ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 "C" Bsse Line Road wc_p,Q,~,14Q1`4~~8 Ra r:c ho Cucamonga, CA 91701 ! Att r.: City Clerk Sub sect: Tract 13476 - Appeal of Conditions Oear Sir: ON lone 10, 1987, the Planning Co mmissio r, approved the subject Tentative Tract subject to conditions of development. We wish to appeal [he following requirements se[ forth in those COP.d 1C10n5. .. rizr.cing Ieem No. 6 regarding the preservation of a Magnolia T:'e<. '. .`.'.F:,,c ~. Lig irem No. 1 regardi r,g Che underg ro unding cE e~~s'_ir,g overhead utilities. -. ;ncerir,g Item No. 4 regarding the finished floor elevzt_cn ...~~;.ots ad,,acent to Hellman Avenue. ~r,c lc s~~d is a check for $126 which T understand is required Co process ar appeal. YP-y fr ^i'r' yOUrS, ~I~: /~.MS ~ ROPERTY CONSUGTA NT S, INC. // ;~~! / t~-fig ~G Lf..t/ Ucr ~_ral'_e f)M :,:h i 7.r2c co: iou Berkowitz /3/ P 3 ~ ur~cirY ~,4iN ' _ INYLf f+MILY p - C ~ i __, _„ ~-i I - V N~ ~ - i ip~ ENO'. 111~> - 1 I ', ... I: i> I' • I4fi9-~I ~~ ITV ,r_. ~ ~..~u~j L~r ~ ' ~ ~1 K I ~ J ~-~~ i ice- a^ •M J . ^ -~ _ „ n~ -_ ~/ N - yy - I ., I ~ i ~~~~_~.-.~ ~ srpf ~ ~ ~ - _- ~ ~ ~ ., ..~ - i 1i1 - ~ ~~r ff _ -.._.o-s .f ,,, '.. ~ r_- ~~~ I ~„^ _. ~ ~~ ~~„ r I ~ _, to ,.... pul ~ j ~ tl r~ ~^ 4 .91/4 .1 _ ~,,~> `YOB' ~I1. 0.pp 'L z9 ~)y~ i _:g:~ % I T' tl ~_. ~ .. _ I ` ~, ~ ~ - ' _ --1r_.TRYON___._,._. ~ __.. _STREEL '~' .. - -~ ------ PI -- -.JF I'_f-.-.~.~'_. .. ....-- li j ~ _. ._ -rpecc. _ lYi I ~-~ No via,_-' P'',y L., ..; ~, - SINGLE F>MiLT pE51DE NGE ~ 2i I I y 1 {~ l~~N~~l/ CITY OF ITEM:TT IE4'Ib ^PPEAL RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:O_M UTILITY LOCATIONS ENGINEERING DIVISION EXIiI81T: ~ N /3~ RESOLUTION N0. 87-96 A RESOLUTI CN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE Jtr DERGROUV DING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UT ILIT[ES AND REPEALING RESOLUTICN N0. 66-71 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86-17 which was adopted on the 28th day of May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a pol icy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments, except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commfssion, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related suDPorting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the Dr oje ct side of the street*• a. Said lines shall be under gr ounded at the de velooer's exoenso. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impr attical at present for such reasons as a short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not un dergroun ded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in-iieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines on the apposite side of the street from the ro'ect: The Developer sna pay a ee to t e City or one-ha the amount per Section 6. ~. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with ection a ove an e e i9i a or reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4. Pule lines containin 66KV or lar er electrical lines: All lines shall be u~r gr oun a or in- ieu ees poi ~n actor ante wit section 1, 2 or 3, above, except for 66 KY or larger electrical lines. X33 5. Limits of Responsibilities: a. In-lieu fees shall be based open the length of the property being developed from property line to property line (the center of adjacent streets for corner properties). b. Undergroun ding shall include the entire project frontage and ezt end to: (1) the first existing pole off-site from the project boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) anew pole erected at a project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a corner. 6. Fee Amount: The amount for in-lieu fees shall equal the length (per ection .a times the unit amount as established by the City Council based upon information suDPl led by the utility companies and as updated periodically as deemed necessary. 1. Ezem Lions: The following types df projects shall be exempt from this pa icy a. The addition of functional equi Anent to existing developments, such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, cooling towers, encios ore of an outdoor storage area, parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc. b. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25% of Che floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor's parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less. c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as: r er ooi ing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. d. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUPS. e. The construction of a single family residence on an existf ng parcel. f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility easements with a heavy concentration of services to adjacent developments, and the utility lines are 500' or more from the right of way line of a SDe clot Boulevard, g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' off site from not h, the project boundaries and the ad,j scent pr dDerty is not likely tai contribute to future under gro un ding, * All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel riyhts-of-way, etc. i2y APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JUTE 1987. PLANNING C011hiSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 BY ATTEST I, Brad Boiler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10 day of June, 1981, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL TOtSTOY NONE BLAKESLEY l 3S There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Mo tior.: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Tolstoy, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map 10444. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EM ERICK, TOLSTOY, HLAKESLEY, CHITI EA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: irONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried t . r . . G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT a"'; TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10295 - LEWIS HOMES - A subdivision of 1fi.12 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Terra Vista Planned Community located on Elm Avenue, west of Milliken Avenue - APN 1017-421-16, 13. Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Chairman McNi el opened the public hearing. John Melcher, representing Lewis Homes, concurred with the Conditions of Approval. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Plu Liuu: rio vets oy unto ea, seconded by Tolstoy, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map 1.0295. Motion carried by the following vote: P.YES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTO Y, BLAKE SLEY, EMERICK, MCN[EL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -tarried + + « . . H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO TENTATIVE TRACT 13416 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY w~wunnia - w res ae~nai suoetvu~on er si rocs on y.r acres or Cana to the Low Residential Oistrirt (~-4 dwel t.ing units per acre) loco tad nn the nm lneast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - (In addition, Che applicant has filed a Tree Removal Permit) - APN 208-111-04. fiowa rd Fields, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 10, 1987 ;36 Commissioner Tolstoy questioned Lhe feasibility of preserving the Magnolia tree on Lot 13. He felt that since the pad required elevation, it would not be possible to preserve the tree and it should be removed. Commissioner Emerick stated that an arborist sha uld study the preservation of the tree and that possibly a three foot well around the tree might be feasible. Don Mi rake, representing the applicant, opposed the elevation of the building pad along Hellman Avenue. He indicated that he was told by representatives of FEMA that he could submit plans to them and have the lots released from the Flood Hazard designation. He stated that his engineers could mitigate the flooding concern on Hellman without raising the elevation of the pads. He indicated that the existing Magnolia tree could be preserved if the pads were not elevated. Mr. Berkowitz, project developer, opposed the utility underg ro unding requirement. He stated that utility and erg ro unding would add approximately 5300,000 to the cost of developing the project. He felt that this was an unreasonable condition in that there are existing poles along Hellman which would remain standing from Foothill to Base Line and his project only fronted Hellman for 630 feet. He supported the formation of an assessment district. He additionally asked that his project engineers be allowed to address that pad elevation issue. Diane Pionico, resident on Hemlock Avenue, was concerned with the flooding along Hellman and requested that this project be required to install all necessary improvements. She was concerned that the grading of the project pates ~,,,,ld f~~ Ulu fi vuu Liie exis clog names on nemiocK. David Kay, 9420 Tryon, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the project was being ccnstruc ted with alleys. Mr, Buller advised that alleys were not proposed for this project. Oeb ra Estrada, 7810 Layton, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the existing wall between her property and the proposed development would 6e replaced by the applicant. Mr. Buller advised that a condition of approval required the construction of a E foot high common masonry wall along the project's eastern boundary. Mr. Mi rape once again addressed the Commission reaue stino that his engineers '~^ •llou2d to pdrsue the yradiny issue of the pads along nei lman in an attempt to mitigate the flooding, at which time he would submit plans to FEMA to have the Flood Hazard designation removed. Planning Commission Minutes -5- dune 10, 1987 X37 Russell Maguire, City Engineer, addressed Mr. Mi tall e's request and advised that the appropriate position would be for the Commission to approve the Conditions as submitted. He stated that the requirement to raise the elevations of the pads was a direction of Lhe City Council by Ordinance 240, which would have to go through a normal amendment. He suggested that the Commission continue the item until the Flood Maps are amended so that the City could properly address Ordinance 240 and the section of the Code which places flood protection requirements on the City Engineer. Mr. Mi ralle requested that the optional grading alternative be left as a possible solution at this time. Chairman McNiel stated that the Commission could not act outside the terms of the Ordinance since this would be in violation of the law. He asked if Mr. Mi ralle would like a continuation of the public hearing to address Lhe issue. Mr. Mi ralle stated he would prefer to have the conditions approved as written with the understanding that his engineers could come back with possible solutions. Mr. Maguire advised the applicant that his engineers could continue to try and mitigate the concern. The applicant could then submit those plans to FEMA and if FEMA does indeed remove the Flood Hazard designation from the Flood Map he could request a modification of the conditions of approval. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tol stoy stated that because of the serious flooding problems W~.: rti ova~• ~~ unllm>~ ., nd tho ovictinn ordinance. ha could not suonort the elimination of any of the conditions of approval. He further stated that he could not see any other solutions to the problem in lieu of raising the pad elevations. Chairman McNiel concu r~red and further stated that the City could not place the live<. of its citizens in jeopardy by eliminating the condition. He felt that the cost to the applicant of transporting dirt to the site to raise the el evaticn of the pads could not begin to compare with Lhe cost of saving lives. Relative to utility underg rounding, he advised the applicant that the requi repent to underground was a policy of the Planning Commission and the City Council, therefore, he co uid not support the elimination of the cc ndition. Commissioner Emeri?e supported approving the Resolution as submitted, with the pnHerv,ta ndinn thrt ~~ !'np anniira nl, comet In With d Letter SOi~tiGn he C-vJid seek a modification of the conditions. He felt that the applicant should 6e allowed to work on a solution for preserving the Magnolia tree. Commissioner Chitiea cork ur red and recalled flooding of the street in the past which resulted in the loss of lives. She stated she would of be comfortable with any sort of berming considering the force of the water unless it was absolutely proven to be a solution. The only way she would consider approving Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 10, 1987 X38 the project would be with the conditions as written. She asked that staff further research the drainage of the lots which might affect the drainage on Hemlock to assure that they do oat impact on the existing homes on that street. Her concern was that the pad elevations would be raised above the existing lots to the north. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Emerick, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 13416. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHI TI EA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried • • :: ~ 8:25 p.m. - planning Commission Recessed 8:35 p.m. - Planning Commission Reconvened with all members present x . x . : I. CONOIT[ONAL USE PERMIT 87-18 - EOWAROS RANCHO CUCAMONGA THEATER - The pro Dosed addition o 12 amusement devices n an ezis ti ng rec rea ti e..^.al facility located in the General Commercial District, 7988 Haven Avenue - APN 1077-661-07, and O8. Ci cdy ,'1~,~~ A;,., La ul :iauner, pre sentea the sta tt report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Hugh Randolph, representing Edwards Cinema, gave an overview of the request. there were no further comments, therefore the puhlic hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Bla kesley, to adopt the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 87-18. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL f10 ES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE n<c r. wMii•~..,..~.,. A.....N~. ~,~~,oi¢n3: NONE -carried 1 * k A d Planning Commission Minutes -1- June 10, 1987 /3 9 - CITF OF RA\CHO CCC.1\IOSGa STAFF REPORT DATE: June 10, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Noward Fields, Assistant Planner ., ~~ ~=~ t(pl _- ~ ,~ •~ %~ _ A. > z /- ^G 1 C SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13476 - - res en a su v s on 0 o s on acres o land in the Low Resi dentist District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - (In addition, the applicant has filed a Tree Removal Permit) - APN: 208-111-04. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: q. Action Reguested: Approval of a tentative tract map and issuance of a negative declaration. 8. Project Oensi ty: 3.9 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: No~fFi - xE s~ing~ residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing single family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Existing single family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing single family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: ro,7e~ SThe = FToa Sing park designation North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acrel South - Low Residential (2-4 Gweliina units oer acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 'lest - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) /S/Q ITEM '' PLANNING COMh1I SSION AFF REPORT TT 13476 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS June 10, 1987 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The subject site is an in-fill res en is eve opment representing the last large vacant parcel of land along Hellman Avenue between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. The site has an existing older home, garage, and two barns, and generally slopes from north to south at approximately a 3g grade. There are scattered, unmaintained citrus trees scheduled for removal. The project site is transversed by the inferred Red Hill Fault Special Study Zone in a southwest to northeasterly direction. A geological investigation for Tentative Tract 13476 was required to verify substantial compliance and conformance to the guidelines set forth in Alquist-Prtolo special study zone act. This development is also within a Flood Zone A, requiring a hydrology study to determine the flood plane ievel along Hellman Avenue as well as determining appropriate flooding mitigation measures. II. BACKGROUND: The City's General Pian land use map shows the subject si- e`f as a future park site. In April 1986, the City Council terminated the negotiations for acquisition of the subject parcel for park purposes. The City Council elected not to exercise its "option to purchase" the property. The Council's actions were based primarily on the fact of a newly approved Red Hill community park site located across from Alta Lama High School, which will be ..~GicataC ... July .>G7. II1. ANALYSIS: General: The proposed in-fill subdivision features an internal oop s reet configuration and larger corner lots at the project entry. The lot sizes range from 7,200 square feet to 13,584 square feet with all lots in the subdivision taking access off of Tryon Street, since Hellman Avenue is subject to periodic flooding. Lots 1-7 will be front-on situations along Tryon Street which is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and existing front-nn situations on the south side of Tryon Street. The proposed ;ubdivision will be enclosed on three sides with a 6-foot high masonry wall along Hellman Avenue, north tract boundary, and east tract boundary providing one common barrier. All existing structures are slated for demolition and removal, B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Emerick, Tolstoy, Buller recommen a approval subject to the foP owing: o Construction of a common masonry wall along the project's eastern perimeter, /y/ PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT TT 13476 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS June 10, 1987 Page 3 o Concrete insets shall be provided for planter cut-outs for street trees along Hellman Avenue. o Provide a decorative masonry wall (i.e., pilaster) along Hellman Avenue. This wa 11 should be staggered to increase visual interest. The Committee directed staff to work with the applicant on a low maintenance drought tolerant landscaping design adjacent to the masonry wall along Hellman Avenue. Any slopes in the parkway are to be a maximum of 3:1. The applicant concurred with all staff comments and revised their plans accordingly. Technical Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval subject to existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Hellman Avenue he undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Tryon Street to the first pole off-site north of the north project boundary prior to public improvement and acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. However, it should be noted that reimbursement of one-half of the City adopted costs fer u ndergrou nding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is not feasible because the property is presently developed. Curing the Committee Reviews, the issue of requirements for flood protection were discussed with the developer. The developer is requesting an alternate flood protection method to the one recommended by staff for the area along Hellman Avenue. ieliman Avenue is subject to large quantities of storm water run off during heavy rainfall. The area along Hellman is designated as a flood hazard area (Zone A) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). City Ordinance M240, which was adopted to be in compliance with FEMA regulations, states that the lowest habitable floors of the residential structures shall be elevated above the Q100 flood water level, referring to 100 year flood. Therefore, staff has recommended that the n qdc ad,~, acent ro Hellmar. Avenue be so elevated. Based uonn, the drainage study provided by the developer's engineer, the a ads are required to be elevated about 3 feet above Hellman wem~e, Elevating the pads adjacent to Hellman Avern causes an excessive height differential between the pads and the curb for the internal Street "B"; therefore, the Grading Committee recommended that Street "B" be raised so that a maximum height / y,2- PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT TT 13476 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSHLTANTS June 10, 1987 Page 4 di'ference of 5 feet was obtained. The developer is concerned with these two requirements due Lo the additional expense of importing dirt. The developer is requesting that he be allowed to construct the p 3d5 along Hellman Avenue to a height at or below that of the top of curb and protect the site with a flood protection wall, contrary to Ordinance N240. Staff feels that the developers request is unacceptable for the following reasons: o It is in violation of City Ordinance 4240 and FEMA regulations. o A wall is susceptible to tampering by unsuspected homeowners. o A wall is susceptible to damage from floating debris. It is noted that if the site is protected as recommended by staff, staff would support the developer if he were to request to FEMA that the site be removed from Flood Zone A designation, which would eliminate the requirement for the future homeowners to acquire flood protection. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has conducted a field investigation and has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has determined that the development of the subject site would expose people and property to water related hazard such as flooding. However, this has been mitigated through a 3 foot elevation of the proposed pads above the top of curb along the Hellman Avenue frontage (see Exhibit "D", Crass-Section C-C). The final hydrology and drainage report will be required and identify all appropriate off-site drainage facilities necessary to mitigate flood related hazards. According to the City's Master Plan drainage system, Hellman Avenue will carry a significant amount of surface run-off from ~: os tream orn oerties. The subject site i=_ transversed by the inferred Red Hill Fault Zone running from southwesterly to northeasterly direction !Exhibit "G"). A geological investigation for Tentative Tract 13476 was required for the purposes of ~ geological investigation to determine the presence of the Red Hill Fault as indicated in the Seismic Safety Element for the City of ?anr,ho Cucamonga's Gererat Plan (Exhibit "F"). As the result /y3 PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT TT 13476 - WILLIAMS rROPERTY CONSULTANTS June 30, 1987 Page 5 of this study, the geologic consultant stated that the Red Hill Fault does not exist as a near surface feature at this tract and no surface disruption due to faulting Ts expected. Therefore, any restrictions on construction based on surface rupture due to on-site faulting are unwarranted at this site. However, it should be noted that the site does lie in an area concerned to be active. Strong shaking from earthquakes on any one of the known faults in the region should be anticipated. As appropriate mitigation, the consultant is requiring that structures be built according to all seismic requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Building and Safety. The consultant concludes that the site appears suitable for development from an engineering geological standpoint. E. Tree Removal: The applicant filed a tree arborist report and a ree remova permit (see attached), which discusses aspects of preservation and/or removal of eight (8) trees. Tree arborist recommends all trees with the exception of the large magnolia tree located at Lot 13 be removed due to weakened condition and poor overall health. IV. FACTS FOR fINDINGS: The site design together with the recommended con ions are n compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code, General Plan, and Ctty Standards and r..y~~...r o~u. urn prou~u "iii but uc uc tl inwuioi LU auj al.C11L properties or cause significant adverse impacts due to flood improvements which will be provided to dfspose of surface run-off and the highest seismic requirements of the Uniform Building Code and City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Building and Safety. Y. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily Re ort newspaper as a public hearing. Notices were sent to a proper y owners within 300 feet of the site advertising the public hearing. To date no correspondence has been received for or against this project. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve en a ve Tract 13476 through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions and Issuance of a Negative Declaration. /Yy PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT TT 13476 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS June 10, 1987 Page 6 Respectfully submitted, B~ rod Bull r City Planner BB:NF:vc Attachments: Tree Arborist Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Exhibit "G" - Initial Study Resolution of Report Location Map Site Utilization Map Tentative Tract Map Grading Plan Developer's Proposal for Grading Concept City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Geotechnical Hazards Inferred Red Hill fault Zone Part II Approval with Conditions ~y~ s richard p Johnson hort~CUltural consultants January 26, 2987 Project ,,1 ~G^~ ~~ l ~ Marilyn Hove wEST VENTURE DEVELOPMENT CO. ,I1U~ 5900 Sepulveda Blvd. X104 Van Nuys, CA 91411 SUBJECT: Site Evaluation of Traea Located at Tract 1347 Rancho Cucamonca. CA. Dear Marilyn: Per your request we contacted Ruth Weber et 7851 HelLnan, Rancho Cucamonga, gained entry to property, and inspected and evaluated all trees posits. The following is result of that inspection, conducted 26 JAN 87. Site trees include: apricot, orange, apple. persimmon. almond, avocado, fig, loquat, oak, redwood, cypress, magnolia, several small (less than 3.5' in height) fan palms, amend two clumps of bamboo. Citrus trees were originally planted 'in-1912 and are well pass eheir prime. This is true for majority of site plantings. with oaaibla ex¢e lion of lar • ma olio specimen to ad at He near enir~e o ex st nq ORe~9tOrY. CWOO~- 2'xl~ed houu_ a77 •ir~ 1...~1..... .... t plastic tie to indicate with a red :'here are approximately 102 orange trees, 8 avocado, 4 ap:icat, 6 apple, 2 persimmon, 1 almond, 1 fig, 2 loquat, 3 redwood, 1 cypress, 4 small fan palms, and two bamboo clumps recommended fot removal. Thsre are also two large holly bushes, and various asundry othsr smaller shrubs and plants that should be removed. Not all of the specimens elated for i'/6 ^435 glenneyre street • laguna beach, ca p o box 127 • ,na „h ~ ~, ~~1 ~~ recommended removal have been tagged individually; cursory walk-through, prior to indepth specimen evaluation, immediately indicated that all but the one specimen magna lie are too weakened to remain. large redwcod specimen, located next to magnolia at entrance to one-story, wooden structure, shows evidence of a weakened top crown and acuee stress. Overall vigor is poor. Two smaller redwoods Ln this same location are stunted and will never attain their proper proportion and farm. Cypress tree, next to house, Sa dead; shows no viable signs of new growth. The oak tree apecLsen, located on the Tryon street side of the property, Ss double-trunked and weakened at forked junction. It, too, should be removed. overall the specimens on this site show evidence of limb/branch breakage; some of it quite recent. Trees are highly stressed which makes them particularly susceptible to disease. era well past their prime. The one possible exception is the large Magnolia sad the following protection quideliaea apply to it only. and St should be noted that this magnolia also shows evidence of stress and limb breakage. No horticultural assurance can be made that this tree will not, at some point Sn time, prove a liability problem due co falling branches. If it remains onaite, building '"' " --- ::.ocl3 aoL :,e iucaced within its' aupllne, nor should any of-its' branches be allowed to overhang or abut planned stii2etures or other types of personal property. The key to the maintenance of the magnolia-ie--to keep it pruned to protect it from wind damage. Sf it is to remain onaite it will need to b• deep fed with nitrogen and iron before the spring "flush of grcwth arts. Tl~T*oothill region where this tree Ss located has a notorious Santana wind condition and all thinning of growth must be accampllahed before the Santana's strike. All dead wood should be removed. Present status of Ma Hallo s dciman Based upon general s to Snapaction, this tree is in fair-to-good condition; is has a heavy amount o! deadwood but overall is in relatively good 'Health. There is no evidence of fungal disease. There are a few insect past present but nothing significane and 1 would not expect them eo be troublesome. The diseases evident appear mainly to be tailor Sn nature and should not be of major consequence. There is evldanca of sooty mold (ho.eydew secretionsl, which gives the tree a massy appearance, but causes no real harm to the tree. Thera are likely other disease problems within the tree but my cursory investigation did not 2 y7 reveal any of them. As these pathogens are encountered I would suggest they be identified and treated as needed. I do not, however, see any likelihood of any major disease outbreak within this tree. With proper pruning and care this specimen could become a worthwile tree. PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE Site Tree Removal It will be important that care be exercised during removal of the undezstory fan palms and edjacent redwood to ensure that the preserved tree 1^ not damaged either in its upper structure o: its roots. Tree removal chat Sa scheduled to take place with 25 feet of subject ewe's dripline should require that tree stumps be ground out, rather than pulled, so that no damage occurs to the magnolia's root system. Should some damage occur St should be evaluated and remedial activity sflacted immediately. A delay in this area can cause further unnecessary dleback of good plant tissue. In this event, a tree pruner should be onhand to take care of these items as need be during this removal phase. Prunino Pruning will mainly consist of the removal of deadwood and atuba. Accepted standards of flush cutting, drop crotchinq, and tree wound sealing should be implemented. Best time to prune is right after flowering, and Lest way is to remove entire twig or limb right to the base. Tree spikes must not b• used as this can creste wounds for disease entry oz insects. A well trimmed tree will never look stubbed back or lopped off. Enhance instead the tree's natural arawth ha hir• r... w...e _-• that pruning wounds will heal over ~ ~~ ~y ~y~ ~~o.~~r uoW ,V alwa s quickly and evenly. it Ss not y practibal to remove small, dead twigs, but every attempe should be made to remove as many as possible and all of the larger dead branches. When branches become so crowded that light and air cannot reech the main part of the-tres., it is advisable to thia~out enough to keep the remainder of the tree in good health. Excessive thinning or heading back, however, can reduce the leaf surface to such an a~cLent that the tree or branch cannot continue to manufa~Ctcrc--aufflclene foods foi its needs. Such excessiveness aiuat be avoided. Fertilization Fertilization is best performed prior to any construction activity. Properly Snvigorated, this tree will be able to better resist eny impacts imposed upon it by construction. Deed feed with nitrogen end lr~n prior to construction activity and before the aprinq flush of growth". APPIy organic fertilizer by soil granular application. Can be mixed with sand for erase in application. Formula conaiats of adding tree height in feet, plus crown spread in feet, plus the circumference of the trunk 1 foot above the ground in inches. /5/ 8 r F .i } i. a 7 i. EXA(~LE: Tree 40' high, plus 30' in crown spread, plus 30" in trunk diameter will need 100 lbs. of fertilizer. For a tree this size St Sa best to apply Sn holes spaced 2 feet apart. Make holes in concentric circles around the tree ns far as the spread of the branches. If any fertilize remains after the holes have been filled, scatter St over soil surface around the tree and sprinkle immediately to diffuse the soluble part of the fertilizer and make St readily available to the feeding roots. Good drainage, rather than rich soil, is the prime essential for Sts cultivation. However, for best results it is recommended that some fertilizer be applied to ihs base, under the dzipline, about every two or three years after this initial application. Insect/Disease Control Tree should be mon toted for evidence of insect activity. Damaging creatures and diseases are few. wateh for scale and aphids at any time and for spider mltss Sn hot weather. Magnolias are not immune to oak root fungus (Az'millaria) but they seem somewhat resistant. More bothersome are deficiency problems: chlozosis from lack of iron In alkaline soils, and nitrogen starvation. Iron chelatea will remedy the first condition, fertilizer will fix the second. Water!nc Provide regular, frequent, daeo, heavy waterings which will help leach out salts and carry them to lower soil levels - Sf drainage SS Good. Hu rnlnn of i._s ..~~-- .. _ either overfertilizinq, mineral aalta1ln theasoilL or saltsrin the Srrigativn water. X11 magnolias are excellent trees to grow in_lawns. These above items would ba boat perfo riot to any major construction or grading so that the tree is at its vigorous best pzi.;r to the Impact that developmsnt may have on it. ~-CANSTRUCl'ION PHASE-- It is extremely important that all parties involved with the development of this project Dacoms acquainted with the material contained in this section •• thep, collectively and Sndlvidually, will have the greatest impact on the tree. several types of impact may occur during construction activity. Most commonly these era grading cute and fills, trenching for foundation and various utility lines, soil caspactlon, physical structural damage and many others. The moat sev~ce of these are usually those which occur to the trees root system; either physical cutting or death due to lack o! Boil oxygen from compaction or poor drainage, or both. Every attempt should be made tc alleviate these problems. /y9 4 Desicn Factors Avoid any construction (roads, walks, buildings, etc.) within the dripline of the tree. Established trees show the highest sensitivity to disease and construction damage. The area within the foil age drSpllne must be handled with particular care. The addition of fill soils against the trunk, or the covering and compaction of soil with pavement within the dripline, prevents normal wetting, drying and breathing of soils from occurring. Lowering the soil level around established trees will often reveal and destroy critical lateral and feeder roots which are necessary for healthy survival. Subject tree must be protected at all times from compaction and mechanical injury. Excellent drainage must be a component in any design plan. Generally, maximum encroachment should be limited to within 10' of the trunk and should be performed under the supervision of a consulting arborist. Onslte Factors Due to the variability of root locations, soil factor and individual trap peculiarities, I can only generalize. Moat impacts will relate to root damage during cut or fill operations. Based upon the above possible Smpacta during construction I suggest the following mitigating measures be Lmplemented. 1. Invigorate the tree, as recommended earlier, prior tc impact to help build Sts resistance to stress. 2. If possible, fence the tree at Sta drSpllne to protect St from injury during construction activity. s[rana_a as rhea may sound, tying a bright, yellow ribbon/plastic band around the trunk during construction period does much to the added '-ewareneas of its presence on construction crews. Prevent soil compaction around root zone; this means reducing foot traffic to a minimum. Canatruction cter snculd not be al3owed to take breaks or lunch under this tree; an attractive temptation inasmuch as this will be the only shade available on te. ~.- 3. If grading or construction la to occur within the trees' dripline such activity should be performed by hand implements as heavy equipment is moat damaging. a, All roots greater than 1" that are cut during construction °^^-•.:nters should be immediately flush cut and covered by so ad or a tree seal. Damaged roots should b0 cut all the way back to healthy iiasus as grading or trenching often breaks or shatters roots. 5. Special design considerations should be implenented for either cuts or tills around the tree. 5. Any soil area that contains tree roots that will be exposed /SO 9 longer than one day must be protected from moisture loss. This can be achieved 6y watering and/oz placing a plastic trap over the exposed soil area. Construct retaining walls or backfill excavated soil areas lmmedla[ely to avoid moisture loss to the tree roots. If tree suffers trunk or upper structural damage during construction St should be treated immediately as any delay can cause further tissue dieback due to desiccation. :y f B. Should construction activity cause severe moisture loss some irrigation and/or mulching may be needed. 9. Extended construction often causes considerable dust collection on tree foliege. When this occurs food manufacture is reduced for an already weakened tree. Should this become a problem a washing of the foliage may become necessary. Although these Stems high119ht the actlvlties which may be encountered during construction other problems may crop up. In that event it would be wise to have a consulting arborist available to advise you with your field decisions and to ensure that proper arboriculture practices are effected. POST-CONSTRVCTION PNASE Transition time from a relatively undisturbed environment co urbanization is of great importance to established trees. It is important to monitor the tree for problems and to evaluate cost-conatrucf inn mainf.nan,.. Nn .m..,,..« ,.• ...._...,.«:,,., .,_.:... ._._. or during ibe construction phase can absolutely guarantee the survival and health of an impacted tree. Therefore, I strongly recommend this tree be inspected every 6-months for a 2-year period after construction in order to give St very opportunity for survival. Even with the bese of cars,._conatruction will impact" this tree and some set backs may be expected. Pest p:obleme, in particular, Sncrease due to the weakening of the tree. Thtse, anQ other problems, can be identified and dealt with during a monl~oY22(g period. SU[M1ARY The site Magnolia tree, for which protection guidelines are outlined above, is the only tree onaite as of 26 JAN 87 that. is ~~taeie enough is try saving. This tree, as does any mature, established tree, may present real and potential liability risks if planned develogsent Ss constructed within its' dzlpline. If it is co be saved it is recommended thae it be made a focal entrance point to the tract - not a part of the general landscaping Sn and around buildings. Conversely, any construction activity in and around its' drlpllne and root system ccuid adversely effect the overall health and vigor of the tree. A delicate balance at best. / S'/ 6 Sf you have any questions or comments in regard to any information contained in this evaluation and report do not hesitate to give us a call. Respectfully submitted, RICH]JiD J~ ]15SOCIATES Dlek Johnson, ASL71 Horticultural Consultant IAT: ds xc: McCUtchan Property Coasultsnta, Iac. ~_~ ~ -~ /5.2, 7 t } ..~, C .,v. - R _ 3 -] .'s ~C'r _~ UY. ..a. ... .!.1 CITY OF R.1 \"CHO CL"C-~~IO~G.~ PL.1.\.\I\C; DI~'ISIO~' iTE~u Tr isy~~ TITLE ~ Tr v i ff~ /S3 v , ~ ~.._~t p L R. ~~ ~~ ~~)RTH .... c, ~r...l . ~• ~~~ it _., ._ . 3 I' ~ ~ I-'','i,~ ~i I- • ~_ ~_~-• ~, I I L.~./l:r ~ ~ i I .,..r.l I ~ T'. . I I. _ rl I J• - i ~. i I I ..I III I l i l l l i~l Ili Ir l I ~..Le~,...1 I $ I ,,....,,~,, e,...r .~ ~~ r r r-r ~ g' ~r~ I ~. I I'1"L".1 1- i ..~, Iii : .,.~, ~.~:.~ I I- _1'1'1-1 I -=T I1~ _ .i_I _..I-. _ ar~tcr II. II i i ` i I I '?I w I I'L I ~I I I I ~~-I-I I ~ 1 1 r~ ~_'~ I r.-.. ~ _ I_irl_i I I . I I _ - ¢ _. t~_L1_L:..L. I._~j~l i I I,- i .~ I el I I i ~~ -; r~ . '. .r,.. , ~ I, , ~ ~ ~• 1-~ i .I ,., , '~~ -t ~-._ ~ _.y+ ~- t -+il- - .i i i ...,.... r,t:~~ ~, ~.~L1_J-~~ _ un eenn.eowo - " -_.___ _._1 i _.._._ I IIII.. _~I-~ i ~ i i i-~I _~ I~ r-= I ;!I, I _ I-:--I ~ I--- ~?e~-~ ~ )R~./ - I . ~.-.i ~ ~ ~ ~1 J I. .~ I- }_I~~ ~ y . ,II-- .,II-- I__ ---j~,_ - ~~` --i~l--- •. I-- r ~~ I'I. i J ~ , I.. _Itf ~-~I I_~il I I_ _! °l_L J.. nocoe ~ ~, ~ ~ V \l)RTH CITE' OF I'L.~\\I\G D(~'LSIO\' ITE~II TTY 3 y~c- TITLE T ~ ~ ^~ , E\HIRIT -1~ SG~LE isy ' ~ G~NG~E f?~•~av PE~~~E NCE ~ I:,, «,.:~ ~ '' l Ili 'rRee~rwl r~+a:: I ~~I ~ Ali ~ '.. I I ivy. .I~ I~ ~~...li~ __ ~ _.I; _I~I~..I~~ l~~ u ii ' _' L__ ~~,~ a .~ .. .... .... .... ~' ~ ° _ \ _ 1 _z _ °f;r .. ~ ~ ._. ~ IZ w 4 W r-- -m ~' ~ ., iI; pl•,`zN ~l(i .~~~n zz 1n so - u-.=`_s= wW"~ a_q .I is r .. i~ ~~" -- ~ ~Y a L., it _ _n ~<7~ -~ 2 C_~ Ili ~~'~.' J,/~/~1~ ~--~^~~~. _•~ ~I___ _~ /~~ _~~ _~31 __ d~ ~ f ~ ~~ 1 ~~ _ _ ii 1 • Y ' I . `- /~~ TRY ~__ ~ o _ STREET ~_. ~-• 1~`' .~~ i ~ i ~__ib~cr. i I~ ~ Y ~ No '~ rare--~ ;ZIP ~- _I '~1 L_. '„ ,. i SwG.C FpMiLY RESi~ENCE a' IOaV I _ ~~ l Y /~,. \1lRTH CITE' ()~ R.1\"C~{O CL'C-~~IO\G.~ ('1..1.\\I\G DI~'LSIO\~ ITE\I STi3'/7G TITLE iFiyrlTdc ~~+ T i»~~ E\HI[31T C " ~qLE /S~ • __-~L_ _ ' '~INGLE F~MILYIfl E~I~~E -~ --II .." __ _ _ i ~_ 'li I I - 1 'YR, T'N0. t1~;11 L. ll ~`~r 7'll ~ ..I I I ~.-_ '"1 i°I ~, _ _. III: :I~ I •..~. ItiT ~ -_ ~ .I L' L-1 ~ 1 .. ~ I LI ~'~1 .. .... ~ • I .i .r, r • r i-.. -a~L, L i.-~ .'I ~ I'll ;~ ~ .~ ~.. -o -, ..~~ ~.*. ~. opc~-•4i'-~ j ~'~~ -- p_. -_ ~.'. ~~r U -.BYRE __. 1 w...~ ,i .~?~ ~ l , i 'li _-~~~I~ (~' •~rd~ ~~ a L- ~y _ 1 ~~ ~,x ~~i ~ZI ~ ! ~I tl .~~ _ n r~ ` - .. ~3r __.~_. I yi... I -1 _ II -..... ~I ` I to r~_._~ z m- a "' II ~` - m r~ • D ~ ..m~acw "~'~• ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~~ ~~ m 1 :Q Q ® ~_ .Ja ~ .. f~ ~.~ ~ Q ,f ~ ._ • ~ xu Yaw ~.W z' Ilk ' b`,--:,"~; I1 - . - e . - - T , nl lll'~~i~ ~ ~~1~ ` tl ~ ~ VN ~1 I n ~ • ~ 1~ ~ l~~ .i :~. •~' ,, -- ' ~ ~ .~ -r- -.__.-._~ p -_;STHEE7 j~l- j~ .-_ •''~~_s_- .~u~~ ~ II I~~ 1 '~ 1.~~^1e .qh ili ', I ~ l ~~I r. r' 1 rO ~r I ~ lil IBC I ~•: i - --~ --JRACC.~~I i YI II `- .~0. ijTA--: Q~i,~l L..-~ ', i I LNGLE FAUIIY RE SIpENCE ¢ 1 L__ J ^\. / ~. \ORTH CITE' OF ITEM: _TTisy~~ R.1\CHO CL~C-1~I0\G~1 TITLE CpNG'.e1oT,sG C,rr~ii ~v~ PL:~\\I\'G Df~'151Q\' E\HIBIT:-~_SGLE i5'G ' '~'~~ REQUESTED PLAN BV DEvrl nppp r^„J,y i ., i ~InGIE FAMILY flE{IG LICE _ 1 r'~ ~ 'TaA6T'NO'. Z~~yi.:-; _ I..... -~~ ~ r ~ --- "^ ~.; ,I u- .. ~ L ~~ _ ~ _r -. .~~_ Y-In _ I ~ J r I ,,,... ,~ ~- o I;ll I!V ___ ~r.~ n v . ~~ III \ - ~ _,..-~ __l,.J~I1 lyl -~r, ,.i~J.~r~.~._ ~~/ %~ ., _ .: .. ~'_- 'w.,,.... _ ~ I ~ 1 "`-- .. :. .___'~-; P~ -~ --STREET `\'_y±~`!~-{{ II ,~:_; ~ -_ ____ Ly~-- 1 ~f_n.`.~_. I Ta AGL_ I! I I ~ i2~y r Lam....=. :~~ia.e Faw~r aE SioE nce n ^~~, ~QRTH CITE' OF R.-1\CHO CL'C-110\G~ PL:\.\~I\G DI\'ISICri' ITE~6 -2~' /3 f~7G TITLE LG~~/n!G ALT1SC~ygTiyE E\HI&T ~„ ~,qLE /S7 i ~ aa~ xegyry ~ oc~ aa~ woad O °~~~, ~v ~slc ~waud: :__: ~iTS~ ma ~~ - nru CI'I'y pF R.-~~CHO CtC~~tO\G~ PL.~.\'\I\'G DIX'LSK~; 0~11~ L~j~ 1D GICwMONO~ ^~ NtTH ITEM: r~ ~ 3 y ~ ~• TITLE G~FC i,ec'nNV n c- /,~~ ~ f+,7 EXHIBIT: F $C,~LE -' ____ ~~8 L/ // i / ~-E rvw~T PESro[•dE ~ ~ n anc. NG ry.5:.- ~ al ~ _- • I .. • ~ tlY ./rA re ~ ~ ~ i / j j' ~ ,~. ~ .. 1 1 ' r, I ~' __ 9TREE' C _~ _ - _._ . ~' I ~ - N ~ ~ L__ ' Y tJ 1 ' ~~ ~2 ~. r. ~. r ~r• I , h ~ .. r ~I u ~ -~--I ` ~Y ~ a w _.){ r .. t~~ ^ - - • y... r ... . ~ ' . -_ . I .., . '_;;,; ~ TRENCHES ~ YI =. ~ 2 ~ : ~r r I iI m . - ,. ~-- __ O r, x ~, :.. .I ~1 R .~~•~ I I Y~ X10. 71M-~ IQIVI C_J i~ ~_~ I ~~ S~NCL E' FAUILY RE SIOENCE ~ 1 ,_ t .. II e L _ r~'i 9W^C~N 9T -• ____ ,4i i ' li ~~ ~ W ~ e`j yi ..IV ' i).`.~ u u -~~ E I ~1 .` ~J :~, ~I~I ~ ~. zoT `] ~- 1\ !I L / ~ 5 ql Z •ii: ~ .P z ~ Q ~ w a ~__a r 19 J ,E'~. X_I_1h _-~__ _ Y INFERRED REDHILL FAULT f FOR" CITY OF R.~\CHO CL;C~~IO\G~ ITE~I~ ~T/3`/7G TITLE S.vFER,~d ,~e~ y,~ rrr',a< EXHIBIT V„ ~~, /s9 RESOLUTION N0. g7_g2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAJdONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRALT MAP N0. 13476 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13476, hereinafter "Map" suhmitted by Dean Williams, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 37 lots on 9.7 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street - APN: 208-111-04 into 37 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on Ou ne i0, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subJect to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NO'W, THEREFORE, the Planning Cotrm fission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SFC TION 1: Tha Planninn rnmmic<inn ma4oc iHn follows ~,. f;~~i a„~c regard to Tentative Tract No. 13476 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Cade, and specific plans; (b) the design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d; The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable nju ry ~„ human, an„ wildlife ar their habitdt; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. /~D PLANNING COMMISSION RE .UTION ND. TT 13416 - W[LLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS June 10, 1987 Page 2 !g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13476 a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planninn Division: 1. The construction of a 6' high common masonry wall along the project's eastern perimeter shall be provided. 2. Concrete insets shall be provided in planter cut-outs for street trees along Hellman Avenue. 3. The applicant shall provide details of a 6' high decorative masonry wall (i.e. cap, pilaster) along Hellman Avenue to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a landscaping plan for the parkway and areas adjacent to the masonry wall along Hellman Avenue to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Lots 16 and 22 shall provide minimum 7,200 square feet of lot area. 6. Preserve magnolia tree on Lot 13. House shall be plotted accordingly. Tree shall he protected during construction per t4unicipal Code Section 19.08.110. Tree shall be carefully pruned amd maintained per the January 26, 1987 report from Richard P. Johnson and in accordance with proper arborical practices. E ng_i neerino Division: 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be ado rg ro;.^ded r 'hC firs po12 on the iouth side of Tryun Street to the first pole off-site north of the north project boundary prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is not feasible because the property is presently developed. 2. Notice of intention to farm and/or join the Lighting and Landscaping District shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or lssu ante of building permits, whichever occurs first. / ~N~ PLANNING COMMISSION RE _UTION N0. TT 13476 - WILLIAMS PROPERTY CONSULTANTS June 10, 1987 Page 3 3. The existing structures located on the project site shall be removed prior to recordation of the final map or an agreement and band guaranteeing removal of the structures within one-year shall be posted with the City prior to recordation of the final map. 4. The finish floor elevations for those lots located on Hellman Avenue shall be above the 100 year flood level as determined by the final drainage/flood study. 5. The project shall be protected from flows entering the site from the north in particular flaws entering at the northwest corner, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L ~ qr au uui fr, cpuy c..~c~~~~ // I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Pianning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regulariy introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of June, 1981, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, EMER]CK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE /6 ~ ~~ a.~~J_ _ _ -age s o~~~~ _ ~ ~`_~ s ° °° - !~- 3 _ e_. .e g _._ ~a38g o~ _ y~e S sa'~ra,,;.`_ Via. g° _3 g`e ~,°, .~o~ ~ .'~'9 ~~=-_s„"s°s3 ,~~a E_g ,q~~?a 'saga og5, I ~~ I ~i ~i ~I ~I ~. E o_ -$ tEx_~~^a I ~ ~ has ~ I i ~~ aa,n=~-~= -:;a~Ea `~ 9~• .7 "2~ ~ ~ ~^ _~~ a ~~ aj~a8'.Y~o l Y B lac a s $ =: t.i..~,s_ iG3 s n lM n u w a 'F; _~ie x°'7Byr ~„ ee~ .q~p _og ~ g`= 5 ~~>c _°a "~°~"!~~>~ a--' s3 .fry <_ 5~~>,' -_ ~:_sx s..,"= a3~xezs.a~ ~ sSSgissl ~~_': &~ ~.:ss r I si i ~~ ~I II ~o-_ _" E; a~i =5 a ~":~~~"E "~=~o ~i-^ ?f _ _ i~h .,Y Y8 X5.3 ~ ? 2 _ ear ~ifi $~~ ~~ _ge ``^bFBk ~~~~~ _'3~'"•.. _-__ _- z~, ~`~ ~,si1 ssY~~'~~, .asks ~~~xa ~;;? '-f~ '-_ ~'s_a g3'S ~"! _gfi a~~fi ~~Ye~j <<"fi°< <§- c'g _ =: l~ ---= s•• - --~a~~ -o =_ Tat E-' L .}'- . a - -o _ _ ~.~~ C. aY< Aga v- - ' ~ a S~ ~.. Y 08:+= a x .g E! ~ ~l ~ _ £ `S gam B _ x ~ c~" g E ~ ~ 8a c o - = ~ , o ~~L SE i i _~° - - ~ = '` '~ "-C a -`9 "Sk' - gar` ~, ~ - - ?= •g_ 'Fz~ 6 " , t Sn a f p~a ~ ~~ yVFkpF~ .8• ... ., yE .. ~•N i c a s ~ ] ~' ~~s ~ _~e_ !- g - ~" 5?' _`-" ~ .i S E`" a ~~•, s i 3 ~;E~ y,--. x ;-~;'S ~ ". _ _ ~ ~. !'•! °fr- a -!"= !.Y"„Z Eli: $ ~ 5~ ~ `f b 4~~s ~$ E Y~~~' i oex~ Y ~~~~~ x b2~ -ea o i E ., 3 N ~ ~~ ~ I Si ~ ~I ~ - ^~ ! I e' ri _ I - i -~? _-? i~`-- t" _ _`3~- i9 _ __ - ., ~~ 5 ~ E j Eh'S ~- I .~ 'S" ~5 yy_ 'F! ~~ ~ 3fi~ YyS. ~aX ~. _ ~~ Y 8-g A°fr~, -_' Vg E']~E 6 ~_ a'~i ;~~ 9YF £;b 9Soe SZ Y g'd o~~. :u ~ _ ,s =2. `~P: Ex"~ ~l sg Py£c =£ Eto~ ~E`° ~~y;a h ~~ °: E w:•S Fa ~s" -,~hh 2~~.- eS SE !9 8Z S§ 3'L $h.. tSS <~i C9 i~ @<'~ =E, X~ o S€y a3Y ~.: °., e ."y frs ~~== ~h=i g~a e~Q~ ,~ any s° 1 E~ 7': d- ~yN .g Mee ~'s 8 Y:; ~~~ _~£ frn9 ~-~~ o8et ~osfi FE~ l! .- aY~g 3=~~ .". 2 i s l~;5 ii~g ~I P1I I~: ti' 0 z V W 7 6 x F`o gk ia8y i x ~ i .. a .. ~ ?~E x:~3'~ ~7E fi ~~ I y a l p _~a E Y ag` >xoo=° ~w: `r G V' ~ eli x E,~I I ;"sa° _€ ~M _ 0=9- -y ax„E5 " ~W~ ig 6 ~ C ~k 7 5 E~x ;= ~8 €~~~~ ~ p ° ° e~i'= ~_~;.:a - sF Pi €" „0,I II =i Y""6` :a ~3i~ :aB§a`sc a = s:'s9 ~a `'y Ml y ca ~~ ss xa.3~ _ a sI s &-'sa &^ I I _~ sa ~~ ~aS~s o°s v _ = xF9 B oae~ k9 a .. FkS~ °.. k92 ' a =aa ~ ~=~$ _EF y i e`Fa ;sari F.,` =~ fi VE6 y Sb k3 €Y. E ~ ~~31 6~a~ eEeia ai ~ hYi _~ L'«~ Yk E Y a~ ige= ~,ic_ t ~ :_ a a- x~ x~ E?a. 3r:~.. a° ~ Y YY~ ~YYi ~9yb~ $ ~~ s y pg 5a ~*F- a~ ~~~°` ad ~ 'x ib3~n a~Yn V~afi~ _x _- ~;,e3 sg X~Y 6s 7~ e~ 9 ~~`1; "k!~ PM ~k3 g; :e ;sad z5 =Sjja~~ ~= FF ~ a•asi ~~sa a~-~ IB is aa~g ~° ~.eia _~; ks r is Fe= :~E6 8F°°'.k E ~. a° 5sk: .. s.a .~~ ~ a . ., BS;C y. °t: ., Bfr::° 6 ~ I 5 I :E., ~' Eg`E 6_ axx - qa Z~~~- ~ ~ f I ~ 8 8°^ .x '~ '.8 Yea E ~~ E; Eg ~ < i €v Y I Z` ~' s ~_~PP it gS8 - $~ 5~$}y5 q oa ~ I gg 7 I x~` ~~ QF:- 8E .g~ ~~ ~'; g"= a ~g B I E$ _Y °Z g~~?' g`g3 Ye. ~ i~ y~~lfi a x~ ~T Y~ - fr~: =~5~ e_ Y- P~ -~ = ,.8. _~ aY E ~= a b:. °f .~"s- aa is a i ~i ~~ pl ~ ~ ~I ~ -I I ~ ~ ~~ ~i ~ 'I Y: ~ a z z er ~ z .. ~ ~ s; sz •aar s_ :~ ~ o B ~ ~ I ~ ~~y .Eg ~YSai aY - -° -~ - I : Sa ao =~° ~~ YES '. ~a ~~ ~ 45 8'W_°• ~~ e3 pEE~_ as i ~I\~~ gat ~~$ =6ac~ y~~~ Lg k8 a[g 8x a .E i `~ Yip 6E~:F is m aL CI _ ry ~I I ~ ..x. ~ G~~ \~ o~ ~ ~~~ I~g= ~~ III o ~__ 0 z ~~ :.l W O Y to 6 e~ E- 1`Yu 9 Yt8 ~!o° I __ ~;. E s :ABC j Z°~ F s=-i ` a~Y iE i oe ._- ? aoxE~ ~ t i aBEx ~l _ ° g ~ ) a :~ 8 _a ~o i ed ` ~; ;E y ~ ~F;e ~S i ~~~E ~~ I \y ~i ~ ml :L ° E 9F~ ~ ; i :~' ~ Y =e~ Y ~~~ ~ 3~ C _- ~ jz ~° _~~~ 8` g t. ,i_: ~S P _§ yi :E~~ "~ :_s ~~ 8:°> BZ ~ ~L €~ ~~;~x rn = ., s~ - ~" ~ ;E ° ~~~~ Y~ a !~ C o='. 3P o hg~ EOM ~ 5 g~~ 7E. ~ A e:e sg; x e B= x ~ e o y J o ~' Y b~,c ~! ~v4 c' E- _:E . =F q39 -_ ~ d e ~-X ~ 6 a-e"3tt -~:~ --` x 56'8 ='S7 "-_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: ~~; September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Alan Marren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 0 rev ew an cons era recammen a on o ce ca ion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-038 project. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council affirm the n ngs o e Planning Commission and certify the Draft EIR for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87- 036. Adoption of a Statement of Overriding Consideration Ts also ---.,~gnen. I[. ABSTRACT: The City Council will hold a public hearing to consider 't~Oraft EIR for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-030. This report summarizes the environmental issues, responses from interested parties, and the recommended mitigation measures to the identified impacts. [[I. BACKGROUND: The proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and assoc a e General Plan Amendment required the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR). The purpose of this EIR is to inform the public and decision makers about the kinds and extent of impacts which the protect and its alternatives are expected to have on the environment, provided the project (or alternatives) are carried out. The public review of environmental concerns associated with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan began on May 11, 1987 with a 45- day review period of the initial draft of the EIR. This review culmf~ated with an approval of the document with a Statement of Overriding Consideration by the Planning Commission on July 22, 1987. /70 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR September 16, 1987 Page 2 The initial EIR did not directly reference the Generai Plan Amendment issues related to the land use changes as proposed by the Specific Plan. Therefore, an expanded EIR was drafted which includes previous responses to the initial document plus the required references to the General Plan Amendment land use changes. M amended Draft EIR which was very similar to the first report but included analysis of the General Plan Amendment was circulated for a 30.day review which ended on August 19, 1987. On August 26, 1987, the Planning Canvisslon recommended apprnval of this revised document. The comments and responses of the initial EIR were included as a part of the amended EIR with the additions for General Plan analysis to complete the review of the combined protects. City Council action is requested on the amended EIR for the Foothill Boulevard and General Plan Mendment (July, 1987). IV. DISCUSSION: TAe expanded EIR for the Specific Plan and General an n nts includes the staff and consultant's responses to caamKnts received prior to and during the July 22, 1987 public hearing on the initial EIR. Because the revised EIR is nearly identical to the previous document, the analysis and conclusions contained in the July 22, 1987 report (see attached) are appropriate towards the review of the amended EIR. Convents and responses received regarding the amended EIR are contained in the Appendix with each item discussed cross-referenced in the text margins. M analysis of the environmental factors which could be affected by the proposed project are reviewed in the attached June 24, 1987 Planning Convlsston report. The report found that those areas which may be affected include aesthetics, air quality, biotic resources, land use, drainage, circulation, noise, schools, public services, soils/geology and utilities. Significant potential issues raised during the review included: 1. The school districts indicated a stynifTcant impact on school facilities as a result of sizeable student generations as a result of the protect. The EiR consultant's analysis of this concern showed that the student generation factors used by the school districts were greatly inflated as a result of not considering certain double counting aspects of various formulas. 2. Concern was expressed by property owners and the City of Upland regarding the proposed realignment of Red Mill Country Club Drive to Grove Avenue: M extensive analysis was prepared in the EIR which addressed this solution and aiternatives which were discussed early on Tn the Specific Plan formulation process. ~7~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR September 16, 1987 Page 3 Concerns and potential mitigation measures as a result of air quality impacts were discussed and incorporated into the Plan. 4. Concerns over Increased traffic were discussed and mitigation measures were included with the traffic control facilities. For additional information, please refer to the attached Planning Commission reports. Y. CONCLUSIONS: The EIR concludes that there are significant env ronmen 1 impacts and that these are summarized in Section VII of the EIR. These impacts which occur as a result of the protect approval are as follows: 1. An incremental increase to local air pollutant emissions, and a decrease in air quality downwind of the study area. Total air pollutant emissions are suw•arized in Table IV-B/E of this document. Air pollutant emissions will be slightly Mgher than those which would result if the proposed project were not approved. 2. An Incremental increase 1n the consumption of water, and an attendant increase in the generation of wastewater, compared to existing levels. Water consumtinn anA sewage generation (which are discussed in Section IV-K) will be higher than levels which would result if the proposed protect were not approved, although levels would continue to increase even 1f the proposed Specific Plan were not approved. 3. An increase Tn the amount of storm water runoff produced by the proiect area during storms, compared to existing levels. Ultimate storm flows will be marginally higher than levels which would result if the proposed protect were not approved. 4. qn increase in local traffic volumes compared to existing levels. The number of trips generated within the study area will be approximately 12 percent higher than would be the case tf the proposed protect were not approved. Further, potential impacts of the revised circulation system can be mitigated or the improvements resulting in an overall improvement to circulation in the corridor balance favorably against the potential impacts. ~ 7~ CITY COUNCIL STAfF REPORT FOOTHILL BWLEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR September 16, 1987 Page 4 5. An increase in noise levels, compared to existing levels, Noise levels will be marginally higher than if the proposed protect were not approved. The EIR also concludes through analysis of the alternatives that many of the potential impacts would occur in the corridor without the enactment of the plan as a resuit of development under existing regulatory provisions. further, the report recognizes that the Specific Plan 1s designed to reduce most of the anticipated problems resulting from development Tn the corridor. As a result, to comply with CEQA requirements, a Statement of Overriding Consideration (refer to Exhibit "A' of draft Resolution) must be included with the final EIR action. Res ally u! tte , ra e City P) nner BB: AN ae Attachments: Draft Resolution Planning Commission Report and Minutes of June 24, 1987 Planning Comm15s1on Report and Minutes of July 8, 1987 Planning Commission Report and Minutes of July 22, 1987 Planning Conaaission Report and Minutet of August 26, 1987 Environacental Impact Report for the Foothill Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-038 (Under Separate Cover) 1 73 BTATBIISNT OF OVERRIDING CONBIDBRATIONB The final Environmental Impact Report identifies certain impacts which cannot feasibly be avoided by mitigation measures. Those impacts consist of a cumulative contribution to the degradation of air quality and noise, together with an incremental increase in impacts on the local traffic circulation system. Notwithstanding these impacts, the project was approved based upon a finding that specific economic and social considerations make infeasible any project alternatives specified in the final Environmental Impact Report and, accordingly constitutes an overriding basis for praj act approval. Those considerations are that the Foothill Boulevarfl Specific Plan, and associated General Plan Amendment No. 87-036, are themselves a measure to mitigate potential adverse impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a planned and comprehensive approach to future development. The Specific plan contains provisions tailored to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and is meant to replace existing City-wide zoning regulations that do not eddresa the unique qualities and community traits o1 that portion of the City of Rancho Cscamonga. Consequently, the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan will result in potential environmental effects that are substantially less significant Sn scope and extent than those effects which would otherwise occur under existing zoning regulations, including each alternative analyzed in the Final ~... ....... u.~. -.~- • ~r~rt. EXHIBIT "A" i7y CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 24, 1987 T0: Chalnaan and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Marren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - o rev ew an cons era recoaauen a on or cer ca ion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the foothill Boulevard Specific Plan pro3ect. The Specific P1 an consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Coaaaisslon will hald a public hearing to cons er the Oraft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This report suammrizes the environmental Issues 1isled and analyzed in the Draft EIR and reconmmnds continuance of the public hearing to allow for review of public coawents on the document. II. BACKGROUND: The proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and assoc a e neral P1 an Amendment require a discretionary action by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is the "Lead Agency". Because the City must take a discretionary action to approve or deny the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the California Envirormw!ntal Quality Act (CEQA) requires that the action De reviewed to determine the potential environmental impacts which would result if Lhe pr Of eCL Mere CdrrT ed OYL. The preliminary review of the pro,Iect's potential environmental impacts consfsted of an Initial Study and Environmental Determination prepared by the City. Based on the results of the Initial Study, the need for preparation of an environmental Impact report (EIR) in accordance with CEQA was indicated. The purpose of this EIR is to inform the public and decision makers about the nature of the proposed protect. Its purpose is also to inform the public about the kinds and extent of impacts which the project and its alternatives are expected to have on the environment, provided the protect (or alternatives) are carried out. 7S PL. EIR for Foothill Boulevard SDecific Plan June 24, 1987 Page 2 The City initiated preparation of a preferred SDecific Plan prior to preparation of this Environmental Impact Report. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan contains proposed perforsmnce standards and other measures to reduce the level of impacts resulting from pro3ect implementation; therefore, it is the purpose of this document to review the level of impacts remaining after implementation and suggest additional mitigation, if necessary. II. DISCUSSIDN: The City of Rancbo Cucamonga's environmental e erm na on stated that the following environmental factors could affect or be affected by the proposed pro3ect. The following are therefore included in the EIR: Aesthetics: An examination is provided of the potential of the proposed pro3ect to affect the appearance of the study area. potential impacts examined include the introduction of new development, the passible removal or alteration of existing visual features, and pos/tive or negative changes in the appearance of other study area features. The rcpor4 concludes that the Pian will result in a significant improvement in the appearance of Foothill Boulevard through the implementation of the devN opment regulations. Air Quality: An examination is provided of the air pollutant emissions which will result from the proposed pro3ect, and their impact on air quality at a local an0 regional levei. Potential ..•pn-.. " u .~ u..i. AuiHilt Ui IICw ur 1,0.1'CO>!U GIII>51Ve), Include theme Introduction of more intensive uses than presently exist or would result from development according to the City's General Plan. An examination of construction-related air pollution is also provided. The report concludes that the pro3ect will incrementally increase the amount of pollutants generated within the pro3ect area and at regional electrical generating stations, affecting local and regional air quality levels. These increased levels are mitigable and the report notes that the levels of emissions will Increase even if the Boulevard is developed without the Specific Plan. Biotic Resources: A number of mature trees, Including several eucalyptus windrows, are located within the study area and could be affected by pro3ect development. An examination of the proposed pro3ect's potential to impact these trees is DroviOed. No rare or endangered plant or animal species are located within the study area. The Plan has the potential to affect biotic resources through the removal or damage of existing trees, including several Eucalyptus windrows and portions of existing unused vineyards. 7~p EIR for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan ,tune 24, 1987 Page 3 If the proposed pro,{ect is not approved, trees and vines would still De potentially revved, although the number of trees and vines replanted within the study area would likely be reduced, since landscaping standards for new development and redevelopment would not be upgraded. Land Use: M examination of proposed specific plan's land use impacts, including neighborhood compatibility and econatc impacts resulting from the introduction of new uses rithin the stuQy area, is provided. The Plan will result in a substantial change 1n the character of the study area, primarily consisting of a change in the character of study area land uses. As the result of the estaDllshment of ca~eroiat and other more Intensive uses adlacent to residential areas within and ad,~acent to the study area, potential land use tncompattb111ties may result. However, adherence to perfonaance and other standards contained in the proposed Specific Plan and the City of Rancho Cucuonga Development Lode will reduce potential impacts to acceptable levels. Ora/rage: The introduction of new development into the study area can be expected to increase stone flows. M examination is provided of the proposed specific plan's impact on local and regional hydrology is provided. Existing flows and those which would occur under existing general plan land use designations are rn~na reA, Development of the proposed project will increase storni flaws originating 1n the study area, and m;y increase ultimate storm flows compared to those vANch would occur if the proposed project were not approved. Construction of planned regional stony drain system improvements will mitigate impacts to acceptable levels, although some sites may require the construction of Tnterim improvements if constructed ahead of regional improvements, Circulation: pn examination of the Impacts of the proposed proaec2, as well as its impact 1n combination with development in other areas, is provided. impacts examined include increases in traffic on Foothill Boulevard resulting from study area development and increases 1n the number of persons from other areas using Foothill Boulevard as a through route. Potential mitigation measures, including the installation of raised medians and control over site access, are examined. /77 PLANNING COMI4ISSI06 aTAFF REPORT EIR for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan June 24, 1987 Page 4 The proposed project will increase the number of vehicle trips ulitmately generated within the study. Approximately 12 percent more trips will be generated within the study area at buildout than would occur if the proposed project were not approved. Since more than BO percent of total traffic on Foothill Boulevard will originate outside the study area, the level of mitigation available is small. Thus, while impacts of the proposed project can be reduced, total cumulative impacts will not be mitlgable through the proposed project. Noise: M examination 1s provided of the proposed project's potential to increase noise levels within the study area. A primary source of noise which is examined 1s the introduction of higher levels of traffic than presently exist. Noise levels within the study area will increase, primarily as the result of increased traffic on foothill Boulevard. since study area traffic will comprise a small portion of totai traffic, the level of mitigation available through the proposed project is small. Therefore, while Impacts of the proposed project can be reduced, cumulative impacts of project traffic and traffic generated offsite will be significant and not mitlgable. Schools: M ezaminatton is provided of the proposed project's impact upon the demand for school facilities generated within the study area, as the result of botA residential and non-residential ~cw~uyren L. Tac proposed project wl ll result to an Increase in the number of students generated within the study area (according Lo the School District) as the result of both increased commercial and residential development. Staff and the environmental consultant, at the Planning Commission's replest, are investigating the School District's student generation ratios to determine their appllcaD/11ty to the Specific Plan study. An analysis we be presented to the planning Commission prior to its final determination. public SeMces: An examination Ts provided of the proposed project's impact on the demand for pallce and fire protection services, and for public park facilities. Demand for ali public services will increase as development of the study area proceeds. However, mitigation measures are proposed which will reduce demand to acceptable levels. Future traffic congestion on Foothill Boulevard will increase response times for fire and pallce vehicles which must use the Boulevard to reach emergency sites, resulting in potential safety. ~7~ PL ~ r. ,, ~ EIR for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan June 24, 1987 Page 5 Soils/6eology: Development within the study area will be subject to groundshaking along a number of regional faults. In addition, another fault, the Red NT11 Fault, traverses a portion of the study area, although its location is not known with certainty. An examination Ts provided of impacts related to these fauns, as well as those related to on-site soil Lypes. Development within the study area will be subject to Individual soils characteristics, including soli instability and erosiveness. The proposed project will also increase the number of persons affected by study area groundshaking, although the total number of permanent residents subject to seismic events will be lower than would occur if the proposed project were not approved. Mitigation measures are proposed whicA will reduce these impacts to acceptable levels. Utilities: M exminatlon of the proposed project's Impact on the demand for utilities within the study area. Consumption of water and generation of sewage will Increase as the result of approval of the proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Consumption of water and generation of sewage will be less than Lhat which would occur if the proposed Specific Plan Ts not approved. Consumption of electricity and natural gas will increase as An wl .. ww -t w~. ...p...n. ..~ ..w yi JySo2u y'r Jj rit yi G~eeua. U1 LImC tC CUe511mpLlOn of~energy resources will De higher than that which would occur if the proposed project were not approved, since the proposed SDecific Plan contains a higher proportion of energy-intensive commercial and office uses than arc currently planned in the existing general plan for the study area. III. CDNCLUSIDNS: The Environmental Impact Report identifies the 0 0l-ll-w~i-mpacts which can be m/ttgated: 1. Biotic Resources 2. Land Use 3. Drainage 4. Public Services 5. Soils Geology 5. Utilities These areas of potential Impact and mttTgation through the implementation of the Plan's provisions is the prime motivator of the Specific Dian process. ~~/` r EIR for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan June 24, 1987 Page 6 Those impacts which cannot be mitigated to any great degree include: A. Air Qua11t . The me,)ority of stationary source impacts w~l ol«ur even if the proposed project is not approved and the study area is developed according to existing land use designations. Mobile source pollutants, will comprise approximately 85 percent of total air pollutant emissions. However, the study area will generate only a email portion of total vehicle trips within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor -- vehicles using Foothtii Boulevard as a through route will generate the mafority of vehicle traffic. Therefore, while Impacts of the proposed Dro~ect can be reduced to acceptable levels, ciaiw a-"TEive i-m-a~s resulting from regional and study area grow will be slgntficant. B. Noise. Noise levels would be marginally reduced if the proposed project 1s not approved and the study area Ts developed under existing land use designations. However, the levei of reduction would be small, and would not result in reduction of impacts to acceptable levels. The Planning Cammtssion will need to make a Statement of Overriding Concern 1n regard to these impacts. It should be noted that the FIR rernanf feC rhaf lheew inx,wrfe u111 Aa evf Mrs i.^. th. • regardless of the enactment of the Specific Plan, and these impacts could be wove without the Plan. A forty-five (45) day review period began on May 11, 1987 to allow the public and interested agencies an opportunity to comment on the document. This period is due to end on June 24, 1987. Staff will take the comments received and any public testimony this evening for inclusion into the Draft Environmental Impact Report. This amended document will then be ready for Planning Commission consideration to recommend certtftcation Dy the City Council, III. RECpatlENDA7IDN: It is recanaaended that after public testimony, the pu c ear ng a continued to the July 8, 1987 Planning Coamission meettnq. Res ful s it ad Bulle~ City Planner BB:Aw:ns I b'0 CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 8, 1987 T0: Chairmwn and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: grad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner ~ ~~cw.+ro'~c y~ y < i n Y' A I- Z 19" I SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD o rev ew an cons r a recommen a on or cer ca ton of the Draft Environmentai Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan project. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will hold a continued public ear ng o consider responses to the draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This report summarizes the envlromaentai issues raised in the response, and recommends the mitigation measures appropriate for the degree of concern nr Tmnarr II. BACKGROUND: Public hearing on the environmental analysts began on une 87 with a Planning Camaisslon review of the significant environmental impacts of the proposed Specific Plan. This was preceded by a 45-day review period of the EIR by interested agencies. The review period established by the state environmental clearing house ended on June 26, 1987 and the project consultant and staff have reviewed all responses forwarded to the City as of June 30, 1987. State law requires the City (as the lead agency far EIR review) to respond to all environmental concerns raised by the public and other government agencies. The following issues were raised during the review period: 1. Student &neration - All of the school districts in the City stated that there would be significant increases 1n the student population as a result of the p1 an. (Addendum) 2. Land Use - Lewis Homes raised concerns over the amount of commercially zoned land proposed by the plan. (ExhiDft "A") ITEM P /8/ DLANNING COMIISSIC.. ,TAPE REPORT Environmental Impact Report July 8, 1987 Page 2 3. Red N111 Country Club prive RNltgn•ent - The City of Upland expressed opposition to the proposed realignment of Red Hi11 Country Club Drive to Grove Avenue. (Exhibit "g") 4. Atr Quality - Concerns and potential mitigation measures were provided by South Coast ATr Quality District. (Exhibit "C') 5. Ctrwlattan - CalTrans commented on the proposed public right- ofD~~ay improvements and traffic control facilities. (Exhibit III. DISCUSSION: - Staff will address responses to the above mentioned concerns as formulated by the pro,)ect consultant. Student 6eneratlan - During the writing of the EIR the school distracts were consulted regarding the potential impacts on the districts due to the Specific Plan. This initial investigation resulted in an unexpected student generation figure of 11,000 above current levels. This figure was based upon district generation ratios devised Tn response to recent state legislation which requires school districts to accept as students the children of parents who work within the district boundaries. The Commission requested additional study of this issue, completed by the consultant in the ford of an EIR Addendum (Attached). The Addendua invlsti Gates Lhe basis of thn crhnnl AIef.I r~ ,........~c nw ratios and tt has raised significant questions. The project consultant has determined that the ratio double counts a large number of student generation factors (1.e. parents who both work and Live wt thin the district) and a15o Includes a number of land use categories not included in the Foothill Plan to provide an unwelghted average of the student per employee figures. The addendum also contains a revl5ed student generation analysts Dy fine tuning the school district ratios. The study concludes that the Implementation of the plan will generate approximately 2,350 new students at plan build out, not 11,000 as Indicated by the district's formulas. This figure, when compared with the build out student levels under existing development provisions is reduced to only 1,300 students. The impacts of these students can be mitigated by the state law authorized school Impacts fees. p11 of the school dlstrt cis serving the study area currently assess school impact fees for new residential and commercial development. The following measures are proposed to mitigate schools impacts of the proposed protect: ~ ~~--+ PL a a i Environmental Impact Report July 8, 1987 Page 3 All residential and comercial developments within the study area shall pay the legally established schools impact fees to the elementary and high school districts 1n effect at the time of development. Land Use - The Lewis Homes caasaents center on the amount of coamiercial land and a concern Lhat this may depress sand values, thereby dictating a tower quality of commercial projects. The issues raised to support their concern are as follows; The company letter sites "the nearly douDied amount of needed commercial land" as part of the plan. This statement does not reflect the actual Increase of commercial land along the corridor. Present Draft General Specific Plan Plan Difference Cansaerciat/office 262 346 acres •84 acres Residential 226 180 acres -46 acres Industrial Park 84 45 acres -39 acres Other 7 8 acres + 1 acres In suwnary, of the 84 additional coamierclal acres approximately 37 aces are from the existing Industrial Park land east of the i-io Freeway. Lewis Hamel points out that LEQA requires a discussion of "secondary impacts' which include the pphhyysical effects which may result fraa changes in economic con~ftTons. It 1s 1ew1s Homet' opinion that construction of additional commercial pro,~ects would adversely affect existing businesses and cause a physical deterioration of the established downtown area. It is important to note that CEQA does not require examination of fiscal or economic impacts; CEQA requires an assessment of physical effects resulting from economic conditions. As regards the Foothill Boulevard SDecTftc Plan, physical effects (such as the deterioration of existing commercial centers) could DotentTally result from an "oversupply" of retail or office development. However, it should be noted that this potential was recognized at an early stage Tn the development of the Specific Plan. The Economic Consultant's analysis, which was included in the Background and Malysis Report, concluded that if additional commercial development were proposed, a marketing program to attract patrons from outside the City would be required. i~3 PLi ,i SSt4. aTAFF REPORT Environmental Impact Report July 8, 1987 Page 4 That ts, while it is recognized that the amount of commercial development proposed could not be supported solely by Rancho Cucamonga rest dents, it can be supported by a combination of local residents and persons from other cities travelling along the state highway. A similar situation currently extsts in the City of Montclair, which could not support the Montclair Plaza and other coaaaercial development solely through the patronage of Montclair residents, but which relies on persons from a regional market area. It is our conclusion that the added commercial land will not adversely impact the physical environment and that the improved development standards in implementing regulations wail aid in the commercial development. The Planning Ca~Tsston should open the discussion up to the public and provide staff with direction on this matter. Atr gwllty - The South Coast Air quality Management District recommends in addttion to the mitigation measures already provided the establishment of a Transportatlan Management Association (TMA) to help business work together to provide reduction programs. Staff concludes with this approach and recommends the addttion of this mitigation measure to the implementaLlon section of the plan. Red Ntll Country Clid Drive - The City of Upland's ca~ents on Red nisi Gvuncry i.iuo urive reangnment necessitated further study. As a result the City Engineering Division has initiated a traffic analysis of the realignment. Much of the work has been accomplished Dut the portion of the analysis dealing with sTgnalization of Foothill Boulevard with a Red H111 Country Club intersection at Foothill Boulevard has not been completed. Therefore this item should be continued until the stugy completion and included in response to Upland's comments. Clrculattan - The other traffic issues were raised by Cal Trans. The comments were received on date June 30, 1987 and detailed responses should not be forwulated as of the writing of this report. Again these concerns should be discussed at the next Planning Commission meeting. A11 traffic and circulatton issues would then be addressed at one time, The Planning Commission should open the public hearing for discussion on these items prior to their contt nuance. ~~y PLAHNIN6 COIMISSIQ:. STAFF REPORT Environsental Iepact Report July 8, 1987 Page 5 IV. RECOIMENOATION: It Ts recaaaaended that the Planning Camoission rec s a o incorporate the responses contained in this report relativvv~~~ to school generation, land use and a1r quality into the ~CIR, continue the itee for discussion of traffic issues to the / my 1987 ameting. ller! anner vc /~S n,mv nc n , w•n nn n STAFF REPORT -~'`~~'~'`' I i ~, F!; 1977 DATE: July 22, 1981 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENYIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - o rev ew an cons er a recommen a on or cer ca ion of the Draft Environmental Ialpact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan project. The Specific plan consists of detailed land use reguiatlons and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. (Continued from July 8, 1987) I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will hold a continued public ear ng o consider responses to the Draft Environalental Impact Report (EIR) for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. This report summmrizes the environmkntal issues raised 1n the response on Commercial land use, traffic and circulation and realignment of Red Pill Coar.•° C'.cS Ori:c -- v iwiti.e r", iv,.Nyu1L1Un uF )IyalllCinL unavoidable impacts is identified and a suggested statemknt of overriding consideration is provided. fI. BACKGROUND: At the July 8, 1987 meeting, the planning Commission rev ewe responses to environmental concerns relating to student generation, land use and air quality. The Commission concluded the responses were adequate in these areas, but as a result of a request by Lewis Homes, final review of the land use issue was delayed until this meeting. In addition, traffic concerns from the City of Upland, Cal Trans and owner of affected Red H111 property will be analyzed and addressed Tn this report. III. "uiSC11SSiON: Commercial Land Use: As of the writing of this report, the a ono npu expected from Lewis Homes had not been received by staff. If the additional information is provided, ft will be presented at the night of the meeting. t~~ PLANNING COfMISSION .iAFF REPORT RE: FOOTHILL BOULEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR July 22, 1987 Page 2 Traffic Circulation: The responses to the Cal Trans concerns on c rcu a on ssues are contained in the EIR consultant's memo (see Exhibit "D') of July 15, 1987. These responses, which the Engineering Division concur with, will forty a part of the final EIR if the Planning Coamisston finds that they adequately address the stated concerns. Red N111 County Club Drive: The potential relocation of Red Nill oun y u r ve o rove Avenue caused concern by the affected property owner and the City of Upland. Upland's comments are addressed to the EIR consultant's axmo of July 15, 1987 (see Exhibit 'A'). The property owner commissioned a traffic study comparing the proposed realignment with an alternate route to FootAtlt Boulevard, east of the present intersection. This traffic stogy was reviewed by City staff and the FooMill Plan traffic engineering consultant. The contents of the study and the results of the reviews are summarized below: Traffic Study (Property ownsr generated) Alternate A: Connect Red Nill County Ctub Drive to Foothill, east of current iocatlon. 1. This connection wnulA al lrw a mm~r.ec/v. /-raif(r flow on Foothill Boulevard, if signalized. 2. Better caaaerclal access would be obtained because of an additional opportunity for U-turns. Alternate B: Connect to Grove Avenue. 1. Traffic volumes on Grove north of Footh111 would cause back-up which would block the new connection. 2. A street through the property at the northeast corner of Grove and Foath111 would constrain development. 3. Such a street would have to be of a substandard design through the property. /87 PLANNING COMMISSION _,AFF REPORT RE: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR July 22, 1987 Page 3 Response by City and Ptan Consultant Alternate A: Connect to Foothill Boulevard. 1. The conditions under which the progressive movement would be possible would require the use of a "half signal°, which would not be posslbie in the N' ew!dtan required in Foothill, or would require inappropriate signal timing. 2. The U-turns available at Grove Avenue and at San Bernardino Road will provide sufficient access Lo property along Foothill. 3. The study failed to comment on the adverse traffic impact upon the Red H111 neighborhood, which would be caused by a signalized, direct connection to Foothill. Alternate B: Connect to Grove Avenue. 1. The high traffic volumes predicted on Grore Avenue cannot be substantiated. This re-routing of Red Hill Country Club Dr1re will reduce itt traffic volume by 505, thus the increase traffic lntrodUCed onto Grove Avenue rill n. ns inslgnlflcant effect on the Foothill/Grove intersection. 2. Property development often involves the need for significant street construction even when no subdtrislan is involved. The impact of a street through this property 15, therefor, not unlike several similar cases in the City which have or will occur. 3. A street alignment through the property is possible which minimizes impact on development and allows safe traffic service. 6. The study felled to comment on the impact on property of a connection to Foothill, which would be significant 1n that an entire lot would have to be dedicated or purchased. /88' PLANNING COMIISSION ..GAFF REPORT RE: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR July 22, 1987 Page 4 To summarize, City staff and the EIR consultant believe the potential impacts of the Red H111 County Club Drive realignment are not significant when viewed within the total traffic and land use structure which exists 1n the immediate area. Further, the improvement in circulation for Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard balance benefic1a11y against the level of negative impacts which might occur on Grove Avenue. Also, CalTrans commented favorably on the realignment. The issues raised Dy Cal Trans, as to street improvements, can be mitigated Dy following CalTrans standards in the final design of each element. IY. CONCLUSIONS: The EIR concludes that there are significant rrevers a environmental changes and these arc summarized 1n Section VII of the EIR. These changes which will occur at a result of the project approval are as follows; 1. M incremental increase to local air pollutant emissions, and a decrease Tn air quality downwind of the stogy area. Total air pollutant em/ssions are sumamrized 1n Table IY-8/E of this document. Atr pollutant emissions Mil De slightly higher than those which would result if the proposed project ware not approved. 2. M incremental increase Tn the consumption of water anw an attendant increase 1n the generation of~wastewater, caipared to existing levels. Mater consumption and sewage generation (which area discussed in Section IY-KI will be higher than levels which would result if the proposed project were not approved, although levels would continue to increase even 1f the proposed specific plan were not approved. 3. M increase in the amount of stores water runoff produced by the project area during storms, compared to existing levels. Ult/mate storm flows will be marginally higher than levels which would result 1f the proposed project were not approved. 4. An increase in local traffic volumes compared to existing levels. The number of trips generated within the study area will be approximately 12 percent higher than would be the case if the proposed protect were not approved. Further, potential impacts of the revised circulation system can be mitigated or the improvements resulting 1n a overall Improvement to circulation in the corridor balance favorably against the potential impacts. i~9 PLANNING COlMISSION „iAFF REPORT RE: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR July 22, 1987 Page 5 5. An increase in noise levels, compared to existing ievels. Noise levels will be marginally higher than if the proposed project were net approved. The EIR concludes through analysts of the alternatives that many of the potential impacts would occur in the corridor without the enactment of the plan as a result of development under existing regulatory provisions. Further, the report recognizes that the Specific Plan is designed to reduce most of the anticipated problems resulting from development in the corridor, As a result, to comply alth CEQA requirements, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be included with the final EIR action. Staff recaammnds the following statement be provided for this purpose: "Future development proposals submitted under the Footh111 Boulevard Specific Plan have the potential for creating some significant environmental effects wh1cA cannot be fully mitigated. These effects, identified to the float EIR, are the unavoldaDle result of development taking place in partially developed commercial areas of the community. However, the degree of these impacts is being mitigated to the fullest extent feasible through the measures incorporated into the EIR and the Araft Cnerlflr plan Th. c,.~~hiP Boulevard Specific Plan itseif 1s a measure to mitigate potential adverse impacts of development on the existing community which would otherwise occur without a planned and comprehensive approach. The draft Specific Ptan contains provisions tailored to the Footh111 Boulevard Corridor and is meant to replace existing City-wide zoning regulations that do not address the unique qualities and coamunity traits of a significant portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Consequently, the adoption of the Footh111 Boulevard Specific Plan w111 result 1n potential environmental effects that are substantially less significant in scope and extent than those effects which would otherwise occur under existing zoning regulations." V. RECOMIfENOATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommen o he City Council the certification of the Footh111 Boulevard Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report and Addendum by the adoption of the attached Resolution which includes a Statement of Overriding Considerations. /U PLANNING COMMISSION -GAFF REPORT RE: FOOTHILL BOULEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN EIR July 22, 1987 Page 6 Resp Pully s ted, Br i r City P1 ner BB:AN:ko Attachments: Exhtblt `A" - Arended EIR Pages Exhibit "B" - Letter from City of Upland Exhibit "C' - Letter from Cal Trans Exhibit "0' - Maw from Planning Netwrk, July 15, 1987 Exhtblt 'E' - Heston Pringle and Associates Traffic Stugy, April 7, 1981 Exhibit "F" - Letter from DKS Associates, June 12, 1987 Graft Resolution ~~~ LAN N I NG NET~A(ORK MEMORANDUM DATE: August 26, 1987 TO: Alan Warren, City of Rancho Cucamonga PROM: Erie Norrle RE: Responses to Comments Received on Second Circulation of Foothill Specific Plan Draft EIR The following are synopses of our proposed responses to cossenta receSvad on the second circulated Draft EIR for the Foothill Boulevard Spee1lic Plan. Department o! Transoortation June 22 1987 Responses to comments contained in thlse letter were addressed through revisions to the fist circulated version of the Draft EIR. No further revisions are necessary. Departsent of Transoortation Auavsi 14 1987 Covent: An identified transportatlon corridor ]See within the vicinity of the proposed project which should be act aside and dedicated !or possible use as a transportatlon facility, Responmm: The transportatlon corridor relerred to is the future elignsent of the Foothill Freeway (Route 30(, which Se identified Sn the City's general plan. This corridor is outside the study area and will not be affected by the proposed protect. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Realon, Aucust 17 1987 Comment; The RWQCB recommends that individual indvetrial uses developed within the study area be sub~ee ted to specific review to determine their potential eater quality impacts and to formulate Bite-specific mitigation measures, where necessary. .n nil Pie~nrnq an~f ~, nr v„i~., a,e ,.~. Cm e,~~m~~ga~>wq ....o r,~~~r,i .~ .~.. a~u la.~L m~ert Su ie wG ~'~n~a n,~ ~ ~v~'n, . ~, " ,: i8 ~I ALAN WARREN AUGUST 26 1987 PAGE 2 Response: The following mi[igatlon measure should be added to the Draft EIR: -- A11 industrial uses developed within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area shall De reviewed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga snd the Regional Water Quality Control Board to determine their potential to impact groundwater qualify (through material spills, runoff of paved areas, use of potentially harmful materials, etc.). Where necessary, Saplementatlon of measures to reduce potential impacts to aeeepteble levels shall be required prior to Sseuance o! building permits or certificates of occupancy." Covent: Although sufficient treatmene plant capacSty to serve proposed study arcs development will be available upon completion of proposed CBMWD treatment plant RP-t (proposed to be on line by 199 0 , problems may arise if this plant Sa not available. Proper servicing snd diapoeal o! thin pro~ect'a wastewater would need to be re-evaluated. Response: Covent noted. Review of wastewater diapoeal straiegise for the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be undertaken, should constru r.tinn nt ea-•_ ti. w.; >.._. - abandoned. ~ --~-"' " The Resovrcee Aeencv o! California DSvSeion o! MSneo and Geolocv, Auauet 17 1987 Covent: The Division of Mines snd Geology has clase]fied much of the land within the project area as eontainSng signitleent deposits o! aggregate resources. The Division o[ Mines and Geology recommends that a dlacuesion of the mSneral resource potential of the protect area, as well as a dlacuesion of the proposed project's impact on local and regSonal aggregate supplies, be added Co the FSnal EIR. Response: Although the study area Se located in an area which contains eignifScant aggregate deposits, removal of these resources Sa not teseible, for the following reasons: /~3 ALAN WARREN AUGUST 28~ 1987 PAGE 3 1) A ma)orlty of the development taking place within the study arse will consist of redevelopment of existing uses. Therefore, these areas are not available for conversion to ainersl extraction. 2) vacant lands within the study area which could conceptually be used for ainersl extraction are either too small (single lots or snail parcels! for economic use, or ere located adjacent to established residential or coswarcial areas which would be SncompatiDla with mining operations. It should be noted that, while development o! the proposed protect will preclude the ume of the study area for mineral extraction, currently planned lend uses ^lso preclude thi• use. In addition, the estsb3lsMent o! mining operations within the study area would conflict with one o! the primary goals of the proposed project, which 1• the enhancement of the appearance of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Cucamonea Countv Water District Verbal Convent Comment: TM n~.r. eIe - ;;,Q uiacuesion or the potential ReepONe: The intent o! the language in the Dratt EIR wsa not to stets that this land would be totally unuaa6le, or that realignment of San Diego Avenue would totally preclude all uses of the CCWD property. However, St could 6e recognized that the shallow depth of this parcel will Sia1t the ueee which can conceivably be developed. Zf You have any questions regarding these proposed responses, please give me a call. realignment of sen Diego Avenue, makes the statement that land owned by the CCWD between San Diego Avenue and the existing !load control channel is "unusable." CCWD disagrees with this conclusion. 14y NSlsmorandum TO ~ State Clearinghouse °°" 'August 14, 1967 Office of Planning i Research 1400 10th Street x'"10'' 08-SBd-66-4.1 Sacramento, CA 95814 SCH /87021615 Attention Peggy Osborn ham DBaaTMlNT OF feAl6/ORTATION District 8 aYa"'` Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and G.P.A. W~ have reviered the shove-referenced docusent. Enclosed is a copy of our initial consents rhicb are still valid. Th• Southern California Association of GOVecfusnte in its Regional Transportation Plan, has identified a nuabar of future transportation corridors. These corridors rill be needed to help relieve congestion, •epeeially during peak couute periods. On• of the identified corridors lies in the vicinity o! this developsent (see attached sap), iN request that land be set aside and dedicated !or poeaible use u s transportation lacility. fie urge eacly and continuous liaison rith Callrans on proposed plans as they affect State highrays. if you have any questions, please contact Morgan Choate at (714) 3&3-4233. GUY G. VISBAL Chief, Transportation Planning Branch SR:bh Enc. cc: PDSUaum,Plan Coord Onit, DOTP . --e; VED '~~= 1 91987 STn is csnr,...., -~~~ r i 9s" 6 W C Q 6 N O ti 6 0 S W u 6 f S ; 1 a ~ i 0 ~~- i, u (J ~; I 1 ,_ _~ . _~ ~ I ~, ~ I i .. . - II ~ - -- F__ II , / 1~~ ,~ _~ i a 8s . • j a ~ • ~ u o • 6t W ~'~ ~ 8 g pp u ~ ~ W~ ~ ~ ~~ ' 5 ~ O¢ / ~ ~ q ~ r i W ~ W N W I ~ - I ~ ~ I _ -. ~ ~WO~~ i96 State Clearinghouse Attentipn Peggy Osborn_ ~ - - _ Pege ~ _ _ _ _ June 22, 1967 -~ _ -_ o "Enhanced" intersections showing paving blocks of unknown description in a circular pattern, within a square, have not been accepted by the State for use as a substitute for our present paving materials. Bollards Constitute fixed ob,j acts and would De disallowed. o Caltrans supports the realignment of Red Hill Avenue to Grove Avenue end the elimination of the existing connection of Sar. Diego Avenue to Foothill Boulevard, as staled under Project Alternatives. It is unclear as to the Intent of the alternatives for Estacia Court. Estacia Court is an east- west street as is San Bernartlino Road and Foothill Boulevard. Ne would appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed DEIR in order to evaluate possible impacts Lo the transportation system, particularly Slate Route 66. Ne urge early and continuous liaison with Caltrans on proposed plans as they affect State highways. If you have any questions, please Contact Marie J. Petry at (774) 383-4547. Original Bipnad By G. VGbs1 GUY G. VISBAL ~nief, Transportation Planning Branch A MP:lb cc: FDHusu m, Plan Coordination Unit, DOTP ,. File (2) ~9~ Sr~ro si Ca~if^rnia o..~ :a, Trompono^en and Mowing Agmry Memorandum Te State Clearinghouse .. - Office of Planning 6 Rl3earch - 1400 10th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 - -~~ Dmr ,June 22, 7987 Attention Peggy Osborn fro,n DBARTA1BdT OF iRANSIORTAl10w District 8 Su6jocr: DEIR - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan f~k H,.: o8-sBd-66-4. 1 $CHA8702t615 We have reviewed the above-referenced document and request consideration of the following: 1. During construction within State right of way, any lane closure and/or traffic control should Oe in compliance xith State standards including advance warning signs and lane tapers. 2. Provide at least minimum sight distance for all vehi.les entering and exiting at all access locations. 3 Provide sufficient vehicle storage in new left-turn nnnb .«., 4. A21 new traffic signal installations, including modifications of existing signals, shall be financed by the developer. o The report does not address the primary purpose of the StatF highway which is to allow the motorist to traverse the facility xith Lhe least inconvenience and Sn a safe manner. o Traffic will be concentrated at the intersections shown in the conceptual plena so that any driver who desires entry to any place on the opposite side of Lhe street, relative to his direction of travel,.ia -forced to proceed to the next inter- section and make a "U^-turn in ortler to get to his destination. o Otter concerns are with planted medians which show trees, lawn, etc. The trees ahoxn will constitute a fixed object within 30` of the edge of traveled way and will, during younger stages of growth, obstruct Lhe vision of the driver. Maintenance and watering will oleo add to problcas for the driver. Workers in the median will De • distracting influence and watering could cause a wet pavement conditions during dry weather which is not anticipated by the ordinary driver. This could cause loss of control of the vehicle. / 9~' Slop a axn.~i. M~mo~andum y z' iu Dr. Gordon F. Snow per, August 17, 1987 The Resources Agency 1416 9th Street, 13th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 ~^ ~ Glitania RgioMl •eam prliry Control Rpen/-SMh As Rglen NM INDIANA AVmNUi. fU1Tm iN. RlVmmalpt. Cw RmM (ATSS) 632-4130 so6jRr; DEIR: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 87-03B SCHN 87021615 we have reviewed the Draft Enviromeental Impact Report (DEIR) SDecffic Plan for this protect. we note that the protect will Include 55.2 acres of industrial land-use. Ne recommend that individual development proposals be sub,~ected to specific review of potential water quality impacts (and mitigation) assoefated with them. This office should review these protects as they sre Droposed. In addition, we note on page Iv-K-B that sufficient treatment plant capacity should be available for this Dro~ect at the proDOStd CMno Basin Municipal Water District's (CBiYO) RP-4, whicA is planned to De constructed and on-11ne Dy 1995. If problems should arise regarding the implementation of R-P4, then proper servfcing end disposal of this pro,)ect's wastewater would need to be re-evalusted. .~.D. ~ ~- ~ ~ ,-. G ~.rtiu.m ,~ ~ ~ e 7 Lr1 Nancy A. Olson s, ~y Sanitary Engineering Technician AtECgitrED Enclosure: State Clearinghouse Form b AUG 2 p gg~ ~ ~„ sr~rE cc: Otto Kroutil, City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ CeARrNOpp~, ~// NAO:ww ~.. ~J L9. Pd Eo Z 61 a9y ;s - •ncs3>! AOh' . ~• . i99 CITY OF UPLAND .~r7~ia ~~iFy o~ G=~meiaui hiving ~~ 460 Y. Euclid Avmw P.O. Ba: 460 UpWd, Calilomi. 91785 1T 1419841352 26 August 1987 Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, LA 91701 Honorable Members of the Planning Commission REf: FOOTHILL BLVD. SPECIFIC PLAN ENYIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 67-03-8 The Cfty of Upland would like to fndicate its concerns with the proposed cir- culation of the foothill Blvd. Specific Plan. As indicated in the Specific Plan, the proposal 1s to realign Red H111 Drive westerly to Grove Avenue. There is significant concern with the adverse nofse and traffic safety impacts of introducing a new collector street Into an es- tablished Upland nefghborhood. Although possibly some existing Impacts on Foot- hill Blvd. may be alleviated, new impacts would be created on Grove Avenue, thus transfering problems from one lnrartnn r. a..rti.. Traffic concerns include the sight distance for a newly created intersection, the lack of evidence that a reduction to thru-traffic on Red Hill Drive will occur as a consequence of the realignment, and the fact that the introduction of a major new fntersection in close proximity to a signalized intersection will likely affect the operational characteristics of that important intersect ton. Representatives of. the City of Upland previously indicated concerns at the 22 July 1981 Plannfng Commission meeting. Ne would, therefore, like to take this opportunity to reiterate the City's concerns with the proposal for realignment of Red Hill Drive to Grove Avenue as applicable to the Environmental Impact Re- port, the Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, and the General Plan Amendment. Ne would request that our public testimony from the 22 July Plannfng Commission meeting be included in the public record for the items referenced. ~~ Planning Commission, City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 August 1987 Page 2 Ne hope that you will seriously constder the City of Upland's Concerns regarding the realignment of Aed Hill Drive. Respectfully, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Plannfng Director Upland Planning Department JA/jh aa~ -. ,;;.; `..r;. tom. _~.~ , . ~~ :~.;: .9tnlw..• .'. .- rnr. ~'~~_ { A ,~ ~,.nuyus[ 7.6, 19D7 --~~~~To: Planning Commission ,g. ~.'Y~L.. ~:.'~From: Alan Warren, Assoc is to Planner ~ieM : Foothill BY:d. Spnclfic Plnn and Genreal Plan Amendment F.1R, f:esponse to comments from the State DSV lslon of Mine^ and Geology '.ei+taddltlon to the CIR Consultant reaponeea to the subject .moue, a review of •he January, 1987 California Surlace ',fining end Reclemat ion Act )SMARA) Designation Maps does not "--'~e ~any!Reglonally significant Conetructlon Aggregate 'Ya~~within'.the Speclfc Plan project boundaries. ~~i-ths{~'Sdfe7l St Plan will not affect the resource ,~"d~f,`~tdoae areae`~oPtfeially classif led as aggregate (VdR'„pWl~lS3rscent SMARA Des Sgnatlon Meps. ,y~ .., ti-~. ~. ;:;... Y^~ ~~ ~' x ~ tl...~~ ' ~„ r a6 a-. PRDJECT ALTFRIUITIYES F. ALTERNATIVE RDABYAY ALIGME11i5 This section discusses alternative roadway aiignment scenarios contained in the proposed Specific Plan for various locations within the study area. Each alternative reflects a different solution to various circulation systn deficiencies or other probldas which exist within the study area. Each alternative is expected to De capable of solving these problems, although each also involves differing secondary lagacts resulting from lmpleaw•ntation. It should be noted that it is the Intent of this section to examine these alternative roadway layouts only; no recamaendation regarding any alternative is intended. Alternative roadway alignments for various locations within the study area arc discussed below: Red X111 Realtg~ent AS discussed in the proposed SDeclflc Plan, Red H111 Avenue (Subarea 1) currently intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle (approximately 30 degrees), resulting 1n awkward turning motions for vehicles entering and leaving Foothill Boulevard at this location. Due to this condition, 1t was determined by the City that Red H111 Avenue will be realigned scenerlos were prepared (see Figure Y-F/I for an illustration of Red H111 Avenue alternatives): a. R1~t-Mgie Intae~seettae. This alternative involves a realignment of Red Htll Avenue to provide a right-aneie lnterserrlnn aoornxin..r.ly ?BO feet c;;t of i.ne exrsnng lntersectlon. The portion of Red Hill Avenue which currently intersects with Foothill Boulevard would be vacated. This alternative would involve the dedication ta, or purchase by, the City of one or acre parcels iocated on Foothill Boulevard 1n the proposed Red Hiil alignment. My structures on these parcels would be removed. Since Red H111 Avenue would be realigned, noise levels on ad,)acent parcels would increase, since these sites are presently adiacent Doty to Foothill Boulevard. This alternative would have realigned Red Hill Country Club Drive to intersect Foothill Boulevard at a 90.degree angle was eliminated due to potential impacts on adJacent properties. b. Extend t0 6rove Avenue. This alternative would involve extending Red Hill Avenue to connect witA Grove Avenue. Under this alternative, the portion of Red H111 Avenue which currently connects with Foothill Boulevard would be vacated. E%HIBIT °B" a63 PRDJECT ALTERNATIYt- EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 As with the southerly extension alternative, this scenario would involve the purchase ar dedication or parcels along the new alignment; noise levels for parcels along the new alignment and not currently ad3acent to Red Hill Country Ctub Drive would increase, although noise leveis produced by traffic on the roadway would decrease, since ultimate traffic volumes would be decreased (see below). Since this alternative wouid not create an intersection with Foothill Boulevard, and would result 1n the elinrinatlon of the existing Red H111 Country Club Drive Intersection, traffic Impacts on Foothill Boulevard would be reduced. According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department, existing traffic levels on Red Hi11 Country Club Drive (as measured in July 1987) are approximately 4,000 ADT; the ma3orTty of these trips occur during morning hours, when Red Hill Country Club Drive Ts used by commuter as a shortcut to westbound Foothill Boulevard. Since realigning Red H111 Country Club Drive to Grove Avenue would eliminate Tts use as a Shortcut, traffic levels are pro3ected to be reduced to approximately 2,000.2,500 ADT. If the existing alignment is retained, traffic levels would remain at existing levels or drop slightly to approximately 3,500 ADT. Grove Avenue, which the City of Rancho Cucamonga intends to construct to a four-lane width between Foothill Boulevard and the Intersection with Red N111 Country Club Drive, will be adequate to accomaadate pro3ected flows. The Tntenectlons of Red H111 Country Cluh Crt:c c: w, e7u~e, Grure avenue or hootlln l Boulevard would be capable of handling pro3ected traffic volumes without signallzatton. It should be noted that the realignment described in this document and the proposed Specific Plan is conceptual only. The actual routing of the roadway, including the horizontal and vertical alignment of the roadway and its intersection with Grove Avenue, as well as constraints (if any) placed on ad3acent properties by the realignment, would be addressed at the time the design of the roadway is prepared. In addition a third realignment scenario was examined during the formation of the proposed pro3ect. This scenario vrould have Involved realigning Red Hill to meet the existing Intersection of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard. However, 1t was determined that realigning Red Hill to this Doint would involve either substantTat impacts to the Sycamore Inn, an tdentified historical structure, or signlHcant grading of the Red Hill itself, which 1s an identified significant landmark within the City. Therefore, this alternative was dismissed as infeasible and was not included for consideration Tn the proposed plan, aoy RED HILL ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES V-F! 1 ° ~j o ~~ w . ~'~ ~~;''~ ~i I~~I i~~ NOTE: STREET ALIGNMENTS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY. ~Q~ RESOLUTION N0. 87-147 A RESOLU710N OF THE PLANNING CONMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 87-038. A. Recitals. (i) There has been presented this Commission's consideration of the Boulevard Specific Plan and General Environmental Impact Report. to this Commission in confunction with recommended adoption of the Foothill Plan Amendment No. 87-03B, a final iii) The final Environmentai Impact Report referred to in this resolution consists of that document dated Nay, 1987 entitled "Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 87-038", written comments on that draft report and written responses thereto submitted by the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and testimony presented during the hearings on the recoawended adoption of said Specific Plan insofar as that testimony pertained ;to environmental matters. Hereinafter, the above-referenced documents will be referred to as "the final Environmental Impact Report". The entirety of the final Environmental Impact Report hereby is incorporated in this Resolution by this reference. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, 1HEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga take the following actions with respect to the final Environmental Report: (a) Certify that the final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared on the Foothill Boulevard Specific Pian and General Plan Amendment No 87-03B fn accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq. and in accordance with the regulations promulgated thereunder. Further, that the Council certifies that it has considpre4 the contents of the final Environmental Impact Report in considering the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; (b) Find that the final Environmental Impact Report does identify physical environmental impacts inherent in the pro;.ct and that changes or alterations have been incorporated fn the protect which mitigate or avoid all significant environmental effects thereof other than a cumulative contribution to the degradation of air quality and noise and an incremental increase on the local traffic circulation system; ~~Q~ PLANNING COMMISSION R~aOLUTION N0. EIR for Foothill Boulevard August 26, 1987 Page 2 (cl Find that notwithstanding the u~nltlgated adverse environmental impacts specified in paragraph b above, that specific econaatte and social considerations wake unfeasible aqy pro,Tect alternative specified in the final Environmental Impact Report and constitutes an overrldtng basis for Council approval of the pra~ect; and (d) As to those impacts TdenLified in the final Environa>CnWI Impact Report which cannot feasibly be avoided by mitlgatlen measures and pro,Tect alternatives, adopt a statement of overrldtng considerations 1n substantial form to that set forth in Exhibit 'A', attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, APPROVED AND ADOPTED TNIS 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1987. 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Pianning Coaaalssion of the C1ty of Rancho Cucananga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted Dy the Pianning Coa~tsston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular aeeting of the Planning ComNsslon held on the 26th day of August, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CH[TIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ao~ PLANNING CgtMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAl10NGA STATBNs11T OF OYENRIDIN6 CONSIDERATIONS The final Environmental Impact Report identifies certain impacts which cannot feasibly be avoided by mitigation measures. Those impacts consist of a cumulative contribution to the degradation of air quality and noise, together with an incremental increase in impacts on the local traffic circulation system. Notwithstanding these impacts, the pro,~ect should be approved based upon the findings that specific economic and social considerations mske infeasible any project alternatives specified 1n the final Environmental Impact Report and, accordingly constitutes an overriding basis for pro,1tct approval. Those considerations are that the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan itself 1s a measure to mitigate potential adverse impacts of development on the existing communl;y which would otherwise occur without a planned and comprehensive approach to future development. The specific Plan contains provisions tailored to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and 1s meant to replace existing City-wide zoning regulations that do not address the unique qualities and cammmlty traits of that portion of the City of Rancho Cutaagnga. Consequently, the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 87-038 will result in potential environmental effects that are substantially less significant in scope and extent than those effects which would otherwise occur under existing zoning regulations. E%HIBiT 'A' ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT ~~Z "s DATE: August 26, 1987 T0: Chairsxn and Mesbers of the Planning Constsston FROM: Brad Boiler, C1ty planner BY: Alan Marren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD rev ew an cons er a reconaen on or ce ca tan of the Oraft EnvTronsw!ntal IsgacL Report for the Foothill Specific Pi an and General Plan Anendsw:nt 87-038 Project. fie Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the developsaent along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue , between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. i. ABSTRACT: The Planning Co~lsston w111 hold a public hearing to cons r responses to the Draft Environmental impact Report (EIR) for the Foothill Boulevard SDectfic Plan. This report sunsarizes the environmental issues raised in the responses on traffic and circulation and alignment of Red H111 Country Club Drive. Further, -rogrAticr~ Y ln,iyoiiicani unavoiaaoie impacts as identified in a suggested statement of overriding consideration 1s provided. II. BACKGROUND: On July 22, 1987 the Planning Coswlsston review responses to environmental concerns related to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The Caa~lsslon recowsended certification of the EIR and based its approval of the Specific Plan on the findings, mitigation measures and statement of overriding consideration of the environmental review. The project EIR did not directly reference the General Pian Amendment issues related to the land use changes proposed by the Specific Plan. Therefore, an amended EIR was drafted rANch includes previous responses to the initial document plus the required references to the General Plan Amendment land use changes, III. OISCUSSION: A5 of the writing of this report, the thirty (30) dqy rev ew per Od hes not ended. Responses to the Draft EIR have not been received and are expected after August 21, 1987. Draft will present consents from interested parties on the night of the public hearing. ITEM C ao 9 PLANNING COMIISSI0.. oTAFF REPORT EIR for Foothill Boulevard August 26, 1987 Dage 2 The expanded EIR includes the staff and consultant responses to comments received prior to and during the Juty 22, 1987 public identical nt Ththe nprevlous Rdocw&entu theTh nalyslse andt conclusions contained in the July 22, 1987 report are appropriate towards the review of this amended EIR. One item of correction 1s the description of alternatives to the Red H111 Country Club Drive realignment (Pages Y-F-1 thru V-F-3). In updating the revised EIR the consultant provided only one alternative Tn response to the preferred alignment to the final Specific plan acLlon. The original two alternatives discussed should remain as a part of this environmental review. Therefore the attached seetlon (Ezhlbit 'A') should De included as the Red Hill Country Club Drive discussion in Section F. IY. CONCLUSIONS: The EIR concludes that there are significant env romaen a changes and that these are suwarized 1n Section YII of the EIR. These changes which occur as a result of the protect aDDroval are as follows; 1. M incremental increase to local air pollutant emissions, and a decrease 1n air quality downwind of the study area. Totai air pollutant cmissions are summarized in Table IY••B/E of this document. Air pollutant emissions will be slightly higher then those which would result 1f L`i yluyuaeu yrojetL were not aDDroved• 2. M incremental increase in the consumption of water, and an attendant increase 1n the generation of wastewater, sewage generattons(wAichearea dis ussed TnnSectlonnlVaK) will be higher than levels which would result if the con4inue to increase evena/frthe proposed SDeclficPlan were not approved. 3. M increase 1n the amount of stores water runoff produced Levels. prUltimateestorwiflowsowilt bemerg1na11yxhigher than levels which would result if the proposed pro~eCt were not approved. 4. An increase Tn local traffic volumes compared to existing levels. The number of trips generated within the study area will be approximately 12 percent higher than world be the case if the proposed project were not approved. Further, potential impacts of the revised circulation ago PLANNING CONMISSI0.. STAFF REPORT E1R for Foothill Boulevard August 26, 1987 Page 3 systea can be ad ti gated or the lagrovaents resulting in an overall tayroveawmt to circulation in the corridor balance favorably against the potential iagacts. 5. M increase in noise levels, coayared to exlstiny Levels. Noise levels will be arrginally higher than if the proposed protect were not approved. The EIR concludes through analysis of the alternatives that aany of the potential lnpacts would occur 1n the corridor without the enactaxnt of the plan as a result of developawmt under existing regulatory provisions. Further, the report recognizes that the Specific Plan 1s designed to reduce oast of the anticipated probleaet rewlting fra~a developaw:nt 1n the corridor. Af a result, to coagly with CEpA requlrsients, a Stateaent of Overriding Considerations Est be included with the final EIR action. Staff retawends the sUt1lent as approved on July 22, 1987, as shown in Exhibit 'A' of the attached Resolution, be considered. Y. RECOMMENDATION: It is recaaaaended that the Planning CawAtsslon ~e Ctty Council the eertlflcatlon of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Pan and General Plan AaKndaaMt No. 81-038 Envlromeental Iapact Report with revised pages as shown on Exhibit "B' by the adoption of the attached Resolution Mitch includes a Scai:e^eni: of uverriding Considerations. Res u11y s b tt , ra r City P1 nner BB:AN:vc Attachaknts: July 22, 1987 Report Draft Resolution Exhlblt "A" - Stateaw!nt of Overriding Considerations Exhibit "B" - Revised Pages v-F-1 thru y-F-3 Draft Envtronaental Iayact Report (Under Separate Cover) ~~~ K. FOOTNILL BWLEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN and L. HE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - o rev ew an consi era recommen a ion or cer r ica on o e Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan project. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Footnill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Naven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman MtNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Mitchell, representing the Chanter of Commerce, 9330 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, and served as a member of the AOHOC Committee expressed his only concern was with the proposed range of permitted uses, including the sate of used, previously owned, or recycled merchandise at the Thomas Brothers Vinery site. As Chairman of the Economic Development Committee and member of the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce we support recommendation for adoption by the Commission to City Council. Mr. Howard Adler, 2081 Business Center Drive, Irvine, CA, new owner of the Thongs Vinery, presented comments of the proposed uses and concerns. They have been working closely with staff and presented their views and concerns to the Foothill Boulevard Committee, presenting data prepared by Dr. Alfred 6oldbar. Most of their suggestions were considered and adopted by tie Committee. However, on May 27, 1987, additional direction was given by the Planning Commission t0 the staff and as a result changes were made which could hurt the economic viability of the center. The speciality censer at the Thongs Vineyard riuuiii Ly Jeymiueu uyun Lire aLiii Ly w aL'a•a~L a min ui varieu Lenauis which Included 35-40 percent of the uses Mr. Goldbar indicated in his report to Hake the center viable. A major clothing store or boutique would be very helpful in making the Thongs Vinery more viable He questioned the exclusion of a furniture store. Mr. Adler further requested the Commission give additional thought to the speciality center permitted uses through conditional uses, Mr. Gft Rodriquez, 1797 Yallejo Nay, Upland, CA addressed the issue of a 50 foot greenbelt resulting in down zoning properties. Mr. Rodriquez is the property owner of the southwest corner of Foothill and W neyard Avenue. Mr. Gary Mitchell pointed out that Rancho Cucamonga has one of the higher average income levels in the county, yet we have the lowest per ~.apita sales. Mr. Mitchell urged the Commission to carefully consider the requests of Thomas Vinery since it holds some new economic opportunities. Since there were no further comments, the public hearing was dosed. Planning Commission Minutes -12- June 24, 19d7 a ~a~ Chairman MtNiel stated Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is designed to enhance Foothill Boulevard by expanding and beautifying it, in addition to increasing the property value. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated that furniture stores were specifically not included in the plan, but conditionally permitted clothing stores, and net wholesale, warehouse, or discount stores were in the language of the plan. Chairman MtNiel reopened the public hearing. Mr. Jeff Seranka expressed a concern should the terw "discount" stores be used. He believed it would be difficult to determine what is "discount". the determination and Tnterpretation of the Commission of "discount" stores. The public hearing was closed by Chairman Mt Niel. Brad Buller, City Planner, indicated that the primary issue for the Thomas Brothers Ninery site is Design and the desire to protect and enhance the historical nature of the site. A secondary matter is the control on the type of uses permitted. The uses permitted are to support and not work against Lhe strong design goals for the site. Otto Kroutil, Deputy L1ty Planner, Indicated that additional inforawtion on median islands will be placed in the appendix of the docua>ent. Commissioner CM ties moved to continue Item K as modified to the July B, 1987 meeting for consideration of the adoption of the plan, Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion, Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE e : • • : L. --carried FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPEC Draft Environmental Impact Report for the FootMll Boulevard Specific Plan pro,iect. The specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Maven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. Planning Commission Minutes -13- June 24, 1987 ~/3 Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report on the EiR for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Chairman Mc Niel opened Lhe public hearing; seeing no comments, the puolic hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy moved to continue Item L to the July 8, 1987 meetiny; motion secoMed by Commissioner Emerick. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COlMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ^ + • + NEW BUSINESS N. --carried anwr n yr vyvaar rvya my 1'T8;500 square feet on 6.25 acres in Lhe Genersl Industrial District, Subarea 5, located south of 6th Street adJacent to an A. T.6 S.F. rail spur west of Lucas Ranch Road - APN:210-071-51. Chris Westman, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. He pointed out that in regards to RecommKrMation 6 in the Resolution, the Design Review Committee felt that with extra landscaping on the west property line of the ad,iacent property which is under the same ownership as the oro.iect site, it would be aoorooriate to waive the five yard setback. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Mark Elliott, an employee of the Nalbandian Group, appeared before the Commission to answer any questions or address any comments. Since there were no further public comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy moved, Commissioner Chitiea seconded adoption of the resolution. Motion was carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -14- June 24, 1987 .2iy Chairman McNiel stated the direction of the Commission is to continue the street through to Red Hill, to study the possiblities and probabilities of a four-way stop at the corner of Red Hill and Sierra Vista, to put a curvature through the new lots, change Lhe street so there's a little bend in it. He further explained that the appeal process exists for those dissatisfied with the issue. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated the developer is under the obligation to bear the expense of installation of any further traffic control devices. Commissioner Chftiea moved tc adopt the resolution with the modifications regarding the curvature, intersection, the continuation of the street, and drainage. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMI415SIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE •.:.. v. --carried Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan project. The Specific Pian consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. (Continued from June 24, 19871. Alan Marren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Lloyd Zola, 2940 East "G" Street, Ontario, consultant for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan EIR, clarified the revised student generation analysis. Under a new state law, commerical areas do generate new students because employees of the area have the choice of having their students educated at the school district where they work or where Lhey live, establishing residency at the place of employment. When going through the analysts and eliminating double counting, the impact should be 2500 students rather than the 12,000 being generated within the district by the commercial. This is an increase over existing planned generation by 1,000 students. Under state law, commercial uses are paying 25 cents per square foot as the mitigation, so the mitigation really is payment of legally established fees for all residential and commercial uses. The fees are in a reasonable relationship impact per Chaffey Union High School District finding and have recommended for their district they be certified and also the local elementary district certify that number as being a reasonable figure. Chairman MCNfeI opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes 23 July 08, 1987 a is Mr. John Melcher, representativve of Lewis Hayes, stated disagreement with staff's response to their concerns over land use. He would like the opportunity to submit additional data in support of their position and asked the Commission's action regarding the land use section remain open for further discussion until the July 22, 1987 meeting. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that for the City to evaluate the new data, the information should be received as soon as possible. Mr. Paul Max, property owner on Foothill Boulevard, expressed his desire of requesting the staff to include the piece of property located between Michael J's restaurant and KinderKare, the next parcel east of Turner in commercial zoning. The present proposed land use zoning shows up to Turner as being CC/Commercial. From that point forward incorporating Michael J's, the vacant piece of property of which he is an owner, arW heading east as being Commercial Office/Office Commercial. He requested to be included in the Commercial Zone which would encompass Michael J's restaurant which is an existing use which fits into the Commercial Office. Most of the uses which wouid be requiring Conditional Use Permit under the Commercial zoning would also be requiring Conditional Use Permit under the Commercial Office zoning. He asked what the process would be in order to request from Planning this particular change. He stated he was adding 1.6 acres into what has already been proposed. Cormrissioner Chitfea questioned Mr. Max whether there was not already a proposal for an office on that particular site. Mr. Max clarified there was an office proposal for the property. They went through the entire planning process and have designed an office building and would like the opportunity to have the option. This does noc mean [hey won'i uuiiJ lire pf1iGC uuiiuiny uuL ii. nay ue ue iLer as a Commercial zone and not an Office zone. He requested Lime to meet with staff and make some movement in that direction. Mr. George Guiders, 7363 Garnett, Rancho Cucamonga, property owner on Foothill Boulevard stated his interest in the Foothill Corridor Study. The ADHOC Committee was instructed not to look at the interim part, from Haven Avenue, Terra Yista, Barton Development to the I-15 because it has been master planned. In the areas Lhat the Corridor Study consisted of, the ma,iority of the land area has been built out as a buffer between residential and commercial, where Sycamore Inn and Bear Gulch. The ADHOC Comaittee gave its recommendation. If there is Commercial to be removed it should be Commercial removed where there is sail slot of vacant land where it is to be designed otherly, such as Terra Vista property. They have the impact of Milliken Avenue going through. Let economics dictate what goes in. Mr. John Holt, 9335 Carnelian, Alta Loma, stated he sat on the ADHOC Comaitte and wanted to update the Coamission on what was being done regarding the land use and commercial designation. It was brought up at one of the first meeting, there was "too much" commercial allocation fn Planning Commission Minutes 24 July 08, 1987 a~~ land use zoning. After discussions and extended debate and input from residents, a conclusion was made the City would be far better off and far ahead to have this land allocated as commercial and allow the growth to happen as Foothill Boulevard is controlled. If the City does not develop a base to support Com~ercial at that time consider changing the zoning. They tried to write a document to provide direction and allow for flexibility and the ability to be fluid in that area and save the land rather than have it build up under residential zoning without proper control. He asked the Commission to be aware of the amount of commercial property being set aside, the dollar figures versus population and business growth which was all considered in the ADHOC Gommi ttee's debate and discussion. Mr. Larry Arcinage, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, concurred with the comments of Mr. Max and Mr. Holt. Asa developer, they look at property if it will make economical sense. Developers will not develop and build out any Comeerclal if there aren't households to support it. It takes 2,000 residences to support a shopping center. Ne requested the Commission to carefully look over Lhe information the ADHOC Comwittee provided and carefully weigh their decision and recommendations. Commissioner MtNiet closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chi ti ea complimented Mr. Max on the design of their project and felt it would be an asset to Foothill in their present design. Comissioner CM tiea moved to continue Item P to Lhe July 22, 1987 meeting. Commlssioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE #**** --carried Q. FOOTHILL BOULEVAND SPECIFIC PLAN (Continued from June 24, 19871. Otto Kroutil, Deputy Cifiy Planner, presented the staff report. It was requested that an opportunity be provided to the Chamber of Commerce to review the plan once more. This is scheduled July 15, 1981 for submittal of additional comments they may nave. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Since there were no comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chi ti ea moved to continue Item Q to the July 22, 1987 meeting. Commissioner elakesiey seconded the motion. Motion was carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes 25 July 08, 1981 air AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * --carried R. ENYI0.0NMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-03B -CITY OF reques arse an se p o ner~af-Plate-reflect land use changes proposed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO ETINANOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87-02 -GITT OF RANCHO GUGAMON611 - An amenament to remove rrem the tt7wanad pec c an approx ma ly 57 acres of land on the nroth side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue; approximately 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Ettwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and approximately 14 acres ofland on the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24, 25 8 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 8 22-27, APN 227- 231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 8 34, APN 229-311-14 d 15, APN 229-041-10, and portions of APN 227-231-16 E 23. U1 - 6111 !11' wMUT! WLMUwwl1 - M awRIIUiCOL W f4'111U~C IrM NR n us r a rea pec c an approximately 80 acres of land on the south side of FoothTlt Boulevard between the I-IS Freeway and Ettwanda Avenue - APN 229-031-01, 16 6 20 and portions of 229-021-57 a 59. Chairman MtNtel opened the public hearing. Since there were consents, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner 8lakesley moved continuation of Item R to the July 22, 1987 meeting. Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * --carried Planning Commission Minutes 26 July O8, 1987 a~8 B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT kEPURT FOR THE Draft Enviranaental Iapact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan project. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the developaent along Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, beA+een the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. (Continued frog July 8, 19871. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. In addition, Alan Marren, Associate Planner gave a brief overview of the project and convents received frog interested parties during the review period. Mr. Narren received suggested responses to the comaents as drafted by the EIR consultant. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, presented convents regarding the concern about the Red HT11 realignaen. The plan proposes to realign it directly to Grove Avenue. He said City of Upland felt that this would cause unacceptable traffic tapacts upon existing neighborhoods to the City of Upland and on Grove Avenue itself in the City of Upland. Ne stated the property owners' traffic consultant stressed that the realignaent of Red Hi 11 Country Club Drive through the property would Iapact the property greatly and then would have traffic tapacts on Grove Avenue. However, he stated that the study failed to adequately address the alternates tapacts on properties within Rancho Cucaaonga, existing properties on Foothill Boulevard or the Red H111 neighborhood itself. In the overall analysis of the tapacts, he believes that the ingact on Red Hill which would be caused by a direct connection to Foothill Boulevard would be greater than the tapacts caused by the connection to Grove Avenue. In order to connect Red Hill Country Club Drive to Foothill, one would have to ga through a saaller petce of property which would involve the entire lot. The connection would Lhen require a traffic signal which would encourage still further short-cut traffic through the Red Hill area which would very heavily Iapact the existing underdesigned roadway. This serves the Red Hill area adequately but fs not a collector road. If the reroute of Red Nill Country Club Drive is directly to Grove Avenue, which is the alternate presented in the plan, he expected a decrease of about 50 percent Tn the traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive and add a ne9lible aaount of traffic Lo Grove Avenue. The developaent of the corner property is the question here. All impacts were reviewed and the proposed realignment to Grove provides the least tapacts of the three which were considered. Mr. Alan Marren suaaarized that in CalTrans response they favorably mentioned this Grove alignment in their analysis as being appropriate for Foothill traffic situation. All throughout the analysts, the reason why the City initiated the plan, was to lessen the anticipated impacts without the specific plan in the future. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes July 22, 1987 ~l~ Mr. Ron Sackett, 7723 Cal le Casino, Rancho Cucamonga, read a letter in addition to handing it out to the Commission. He represents the San Antonio Community Hospital, the owner of the property that would be directly impacted by the realignment. He stated the City has never responded to their reports by a professional traffic engineer. To this time, they could never respond to questions raised by the City in regards to the report. They would like to see the City delay a decision on this issue. Mr. Jeff Bloom, City of Upland Planning Director, 46o North Euclid, stated the concern for the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive and its impacts on the City of Upland. Nhat changes have been made to the draft resolution4 Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, gave Nr. Bloom a copy of the draft resolution and stated there had been added the mandatory findings of CEQA. Mr. Bloom indicated the City of Upland is very disturbed by the prospects of realigning 0.ed H111 Country Club Drive. He referred to the letter of June 23, 1987 that outlined the areas of the draft Environmental Report that in particular concerns the City of Upland. They believe the response to comments continues to ignore the impacts which may arise from the Implementation of the proposed realignment. He was concerned that we were not trading off impacts from one city to the other. The mitigation measures suggest the realignment should occur expeditiously, the report concludes the realignment is conceptual. Does this mean we aren't adopting any realignments and are we going to do a full environmental assessment and actually route a Red Nill realignment to Grove Avenue or to any other area along foothill Boulevard? if this is not the case, ne suggestea that this t1N nos not fully addressed the different technical needs as far as the realignment and the impacts it would have. It would seem appropriate to the City of Up1anA to do such a detailed analysis before making a decision. They did point out in the letter that the actual land use implications on the property should be addressed and they were unable to find satfsfactory evidence that this had been addressed. The impacts, in City of Upland's opinion, will greatly cause the traffic on Grove Avenue to increase and conflict with the local residential traffic that already uses Grove Avenue and instead of eliminating a problem they would be compounding a problem on Grove Avenue. Mr. Jim Chase, 8467 Red Hil Country Club Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, spoke on behalf of the Red Hill Country Club. He expressed the views of the country club stating the realfgnment of Red Htll Country Club Drive through kramer property to Grove is merely taking the problem from Foothill and moving it to Grove. They are very much opposed to the option of going through the kramer property. Mr. Larry Arcinage, 7650 Cal le Casino, Rancho Cucamonga, owner of five parcels within the specific plan area. He expressed he had not received a notice of this meeting. Planning Commission Minutes July 22, 1987 ~b Chaiman McNiel clariffed that the process regarding Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan has been going on for 1-2 years indicating it has been a continued Heeling which had Deen appropriatedly notice, Mr. Arcinage stated opposition to the recoHmeridation to the rerouting of Red Hill Country Club Drive to Grove Avenue. There is already recess to Foothill Boulevard. He felt that the sales tax dollars would be taken away fraa the City of Rancho Cucamonga and sent to the City of Upland rather than having the people turning into Rancho Cucamonga and spending their dollars here. He concurred with Mr. Chase's cowaents and suggested the Commisison take a longer viewpoint, have RSK give another study. Enough public opinion should indicate that the local people are against it. Once this gets to the council agenda, there will be More vocal opposition. Ms. Elisa Ricardless, owner of the gas station fnvolved in the corridor, stated opposition feeling it would affect her business a great deal. She felt that a decrease in her business would Mean less taxes for the City of Rancho CucaHOnga. Mr. Jack Madson, 1521 N. Nebster, representative of NMC Architects in Clareiwnt, who represents the owner of the property on the corner in question, San Antonio Coarunity Hospital. One of the issues brought out by the City in their review of the research and study taking place indicated the property in question would be required to provide the direct access. In discussion with Paul Rougeau, they discussed this was a major issue in developing that particular access directly froth Red Hill to Foothill Boulevard. The hospital is very concerned to the point that they want the City to know they are willing to work with the City and are willing and able to Hake that property avallaDle. He indicated the City should 6e able to appreciate their concern and what They are offering in this regard. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Blakesley asked the comments of the ADHOC Committee. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated the committee discussed these issues but initially had no real preference as to the realignment. In the beginning, the traffic people had no preference. The advisory committee discussed this at length, a tot of people for and against the realignment. The decision was made based on the treffic and engineering analysis, It doesn't make sense to put a traffic tight in the location on Foothill and create another median break, create another signalized intersection, where there is an optfon to solve most of the problems is another way. One paint to consider, specifics of the realignment have been purposefully left out to allow enough flexi6111ty Lo make the Dest use of engineering practices and use of land to make it work. They know exactly where the alignment would enter onto Grove and where the alignment would enter onto the property in the southeast corner, but rather than putting down specific line between the two points, it was felt by the Committee and Commission that part of it should be left flexibile. The design then could be dealt with in a realistic and Planning Commission Minutes 3 Juty 22, 1987 a al intelligent fashion. Another point to consider is when people look at Foothill Boulevard today, the need to do something may not appear that obvious. What is being looked at now is the tong term plan where traffic flow is approaching an average 60,000 daily trips which is significantly more than the existing boulevard can handle. Ones of the most significant components of the Foothill Plan is a rather stringent traffic control system that stretches from the Upland city limits to the Fontana city limits. tt is integrated, and provides far a median and signals that are spaced in locations for the optimum in timing and also provides traffic access controls. It provides the best ultimate solution which wilt work for alt the other concerns. The Red Hill realignment is only a smelt component of the overral system. Chairman MtNiel stated that Foothill Boulevard is going to carry a tremendous amount of traffic and this will be very difficult to maintain the traffic through the community. One of the things not to do is put signals at every intersection where it will slow traffic flow. Foothill Boulevard wilt be three lanes going in each direction. The best method is to put as few stops in Foothill Boulevard as possible. Where this is proposed to align onto Grove Avenue 1s at the driveway of the shoDDin9 center that is right across the street of Grove, adjacent to residential but is at commercial. There should be reduction of traffic across Red Nill and Alta Cuesta. This is the appropriate solution to the abundance of the traffic on Foothill Boulevard. Now is the time to make a sound judgment. Commissioner Emerick felt the proposed alignment has been well analyzed by the staff and advocates the realignment from the discussion heard. Commissioner Chitiea agreed with the comments of Chairman MCNteI and Commissioner Emerick. One of the major reasons that a stop light was not to be put in by the sycamore Inn would be encouragement for traffic to go through Red Hill and that would certainly impact the neighborhood. The decisfon was not made capriciously and this was given a great deal of thought. There is not an ideal solution but the one proposed would be the best. As for the argument that it impacts on the neighborhoods in Upland, the residential area is above this, there is no impact through the Upland residential area whatsoever. This is all south of that development and directly across from Upland's very large commercial center which they are expanding upon themselves and will be inviting a great deal of traffic to that commercial center at approximately the same location in from Grove. Chairman Mc Niel asked for comments on the other parts of the draft EIR. Commissioner Chitiea felt the draft EIR had been adequately addressed, Chairman NcNiel stated the City has been a city of plans and districts, a cfty that exceeds what needs to be done in order to plan a reasonable community. He recognfzed the efforts of the ADHOC Commi'tee and feels this document is an enormous undertaking. He requested thank you notes he sent to those who were on the AOHOC Committee. Planning Commission Minutes 4 July 22, 1987 ~~~ Commissioner Emerick moved for adoption of the resolution recommcending certification by the City Council on Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion was unanimously carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COIMIISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY Otto Kroutil confirneed this is the revised resolution and includes Che approval of responses to comments received and the Statement of Overriding Considerations. * * * * * --carried C. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - A Dublic hearing to consider approva o ra oo ulevard Specific Plan. The draft Specific plan provides for detailed lam use categories and development standards for all future developments on properties adiacent to Foothill Boulevard (Continued from July 8, 1987). Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. He commented on the modffications and minor changes clarifying certain points in the plan. Staff had received no negative response from the Chamber of Commerce in their presentation on July 15, 1987 and have received their support. From the discussion regarding the permitted uses including apparel stores and minor repairs, it is the understanding LiiaL aiiuwiny yenerai ayyarei ai.urea in Liw: ape~iai Ly ~aw,er~iai a,w community commercial is the direction of the Commission. This would involve elimination of wholesale and discount stores as a category. The same comment relates to the minor repair since the direction of the Commission was to allow minor automobile repair conditionally with a Londitionai Use Permit in Community Commercial areas. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Mr. Sanford Bloom, owner of the property at 9494 Foothill Boulevard, spokesman on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Harold Lundgren and Mr. Hillgren, as well as a number of owners of small nonconforming lots facing Foothill. Mr. Bloom's had a concern with the the definition of Mixed Use. This would benefit by the greater flexibility and the broadening that the Commission allotted to it than it. This definition should be replaced by one which reflects the fact that the property could be developed as all commercial, all residential, or a mixture of the two. He also stated his concern with the westward extension of Estacia and the northward extension of Malachite. He felt the Commission would want to promote the best possible cfrculation for the develnpment of the property consistent with community needs including Lhe issue of access and egress of San Bernardino Road. Planning Commissfon Minutes July 22, 1987 aaa Mr. Jeff Bloom restated opposition regarding proposed realignment of Red Hill as indicated in the draft of the Specific Plan. The City of Upland is concerned with the traffic impacts which would occur on Grove Avenue and the land use impacts which would occur as a result of the realignment. it is possible, in the opinion of the traffic engineers for the City of Upland and the report far the hospital, to develop intersections which they do not believe impact overly Foothill Boulevard, Tn particular the matching of alignments with San Bernardino Road Tn a "T" intersection would enable that alignment to occur without the addition of additional signalization. The City of Upland does share the City of Rancho Cucamonga's pride in the fact that a lot has been accomplished in tackling the Foothill Doulevard Specific Plan. Mr. Ron Sackett, 7723 Calle Casino, Rancho Cucamonga, stated opposition to the Red Hill Country Club Drive and feels it would seriously impact the property. Mr. Larry Arcinage, 7650 Cal le Casino, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the tree standards on the corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Otto Krouttl, Deputy City Planner, stated Lhat the City is trying to avoid two sets of specific plans in regards to this inters action. They recommend the strip of land subject to the Etiwanda Plan be removed from the Etiwanda Plan and be replaced by Lhe provisions of Lhe Foothill Plan. They are asking the Commission if the provisions relative to the Eucalyptus grove are appropriate,and if so, those provisions ought to be added to the draft of the Foothill Plan. Mr. Arcinage objected to the idea that this was a last-minute item and the manner to how things come up for discussion at the last minute. Chairman M[Niel clarified that pieces of property governed by two governing plans will have one plan extracted and governed by one. Mr. Jim Chase, 8467 Red Hi11 Country Club Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, voiced opposition for the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive. Nelda Longren, 1205 North Third Avenue, Upland, concurred with Dr. 81oom, regarding the acreage on Lhe mixed use land use issue. They need room and flexibility to work. They have almost 1,000 feet on Foothill Boulevard to be developed, she stated, Chairman Mc NTeI closed the public hearing. Commissioner Emerick couwented on Mr. Arcinage's conerns on last-minute discussion and agreed with his coaments. The staff has done a very good job with the plan and the complexity of the plan, Commissioner Chi ti ea commented on Mrs. Lundgren's mixed use piece. This plan should allow far the flexibility that fs needed and promotes development and creativity. Planning Commission Minutes July 22, 1987 ~~y Caawissioner Chitiea agved adoption of the plan as corrected with the inforawtlon therein. Caawissioner Ea~erick seconded the cotton. Motion was unaniawusly carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, EMERICK, NCNIEL NOES: COIMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY x w ~ w --carried Planning Conwisston NTnutes 7 July 22, 1981 gas C. nnv ucncn~a ri.nn mcnwxm or-wu - ~u rc.~ew anu was wer a recoimie a on or cer ca ono the Draft EnvironAtental Impact Report for the Foothill Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 87-030 protect. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulatfons and standards for the development along Foothfll Boulevard between Grove Avenue and Haven Avenue, between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-038 - CITY OF nnm.nu w~rrnmmn n rcyuesc cv amenu sne ~anv use nap vi ilia nera an reflect land use changes proposed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Continued from July 22, 1987). Alan Marren presented the staff report. Mr. Warren submitted a memorandum regarding Foothill Boulevard Specifc Plan and General Plan Amendment E1R Comaents and Responses which he outlined for the Coawission. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chitiea commented she had some personal reservations about changing of the Medium Residential to Coamercial on the Resolution, Item D. Commissf oner Chitiea moved to approve the resolution on Item C, Coaotissioner 8lakestey seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY +.*~~R --carried Coaatssioner Chitiea moved to approve the resolution on Item 0, Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion carried 6y the foliowing vote: AYES: COIMiSSI0NER5: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMIISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY .+•.•. --carried Planning Comaisston Minutes -1- August 26, 1981 a ~~ REBOLQTION NO. S ~ -sO3 A RESOLDTZON OF THH CITY COQNCIL 08 THS CITY OF RANCHO CQCAMOMOA CSRTIPYIN6 THB FINAL BNVIRONNENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR T88 FOOTNILL HOQLBFARD BPSCIPIC PLAN AND OHNERAL PLAN AMHNDMBNT NO. 87-03H, AND MARINO FINDINOB IM BQPPORT TRSREOP. A. Recitals (i) There has been presented to this Council in conjunction with this Council's consideration of the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-03B a final Environmental Impact Report. (ii) The final Environmental Impact Report referred to in this resolution consists of chat document dated July, 1987 entitled "Draft Environmental Impact Report Por the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-03B^, written comments on that draft report and written responses thereto submitted by the staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and testimony presented during the hearings of the Planning Commission on the recommended adoption of said Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment insofar as that testimony pertained to environmental matters. Hereinafter, the above-referenced documents will be referred to as ^the final Environmental Impact Report." The entirety of the final Environmental Impact Report hereby is innnrnn~af e,a i^ •wi, .?_.....,.t iJl .`.y t:iia •aiateuue. (iii) on August 26, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the final Environmental Impact Report and, at the conclusion of said hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 87-147 thereby recommending that this Council certify as complete the final Environmental Impact Report. (iv) On September 16, 1987, this Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the certification of the final Environmental Impact Report and said public hearing Was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (vj All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resold*ion have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: aa~ Resolution No. Page 2 1. In all respects as set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared on the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Flan Amendment 87-038 in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq. and in accordance with the regulations promulgated thereunder. Further, that this Council certifies that it has considered the contents of the final Environmental Zmpact Report in considering the adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment 87-03 B. 3. This Council hereby finds that the final Environmental Impact Report does identify physical environmental impacts inherent in the project and that changes or alterations have been incorporated in the project which mitigate or avoid all significant environmental effects thereof other than a cumulative contribution to the degradation of air quality and noise and an incremental increase on the local traffic circulation system. 4. This Council hereby finds that notwithstanding the unmitigated adverse environmental impacts specified in paragraph 3 above, that specific economic and social considerations make _,.,_ _._ ~~ a uij ~.r..,loGt uitc iiotlle e~Ie~.1lLCY 111 NIO LLIIOl Environmental Impact Reportland constitutes an overriding basis for Council approval of the project. 5. As to those impacts identified in the final Environmental impact Report which cannot feasibly be avoided by mitigation measures and project alternatives, this Council hereby adopts a statement of overriding considerations as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated 6y this reference. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED and APPROVED this 16th day of September, 1987. Mayor a~g Resolution No. Page 3 I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of September, 1987, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk oY the City of Rancho Cucamonga L\113\RESO aa9 „ . ~~.A,"°nc STAFF REPORT ~~' ~., o~ ~~ ~~ ~b5 ~! DATE: September 16, 1987 ~~ 'i! 1977 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-03B - ~' reques o amen a an se p o e nera an o reflect land use changes proposed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as follows: 1. Commercial to Office for 8.45 acres on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207- 011-43 and 44. 2. Office to Conwercial for: a. Approximately 3 acres on the northeast corner of Red Hill Country Club Drive and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-113-O1, 10; b. Approximately 3.5 acres on the southwest corner of Carnelian Avenue and San Bernardino Road -APN 207-102- 03, 05, 08, 09, 12 and 19; c. Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner of Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24, 25 and 21; and d. Approximately 5 acres on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229-311-14 and 15. 3, Medium Residentfal to Commercial for: a. Approximately 11 acres on the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - portions of APN 208-321-23 and 24; b. Approximately 7.5 acres, 175 feet north of Foothill ~ Boulevard on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227-201-08 and 22, and portions of APN 227-201-07; and c. Approximately 5,5 acres, 500 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side mf East Avenue - portions of ,APN 227-23-23. d30 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 87-038 September 16, 1987 Page 2 4. Low Residential to Cosoercial for approximately 9 acres, 300 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the east side of Turner Avenue - APN 1077-601-08 and 10, and portions of APN 1077-601-02 and 04. 5. Industrial Park to Commercial for approximately 37 acres an the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229-031-03-13 and 20. 6. To ad,~ust the line between Medium Residential and Commercial in the block bordered by foothill Boulevard, San Bernardino Road, Hellman Avenue and Klusman Avenue (see exhibit). Division line as shown 15 approximate. Precise location of land use divisions to be determined through the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I. RECOMMENDATION: At its meeting of August 26, 1987, the Planning ss an recoamrended the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 87-038. If the Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of ADProval would be appropriate. II. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The land use changes listed in this em are ac ons necessary in the anticipation of adoption of the Foothill Bouievard Specific Plan (see Resolution, Exhibit "A"). The General Plan Naendment will change land use designations for those mrooertirc alnnn Fnnihill MplapanA ~ ....~ s,... .h.."•y~ C; the Draft Specific Plen. The General Ptan imust be amended before final approval of the Specific Plan by the City Council. III. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Environmental Assessment of the enera an n n s tied directly to the Envlronmerttal Review of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Therefore, it has been determined that an expanded Environmental Impact Report, including the General Plan issues, is required. The EIR review period ended on August 18, 1987, certification of this EIR is also on tonight's agenda, as a separate item. IV. PLANNING COMMISSION PGTION: The Planning Commission at its mee ng o ugus recommnded the City Council certify the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Generai plan 87-038 EIR, and further recommended the approval of General Plan AmendBent 87- 03B be approved through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. X31 CITY CDNNCIL STAFF REPDRT RE: 6PA 87-038 September 16, 1987 Page 3 Aesp u11y submitted, Brad u er City P anner BB:CK:ko Attachments: Planning CWm1115510n Staff Report of August 26, 1987 Draft planning Commission Minutes of August 26, 1987 Resolution No. 87-148 Resolution of Approval aa~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 26, 1987 ; T0: is; Chairman and Members of the planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: plan Marren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-038 - - reques o amen a an se map o e enera an to reflect land use changes proposed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as follows; (Continued frao July 22, 1987) 1. Commercial to Office for 8.45 acres on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-011-43 and 44. 2. Office to Capwercial for: a. Approximately 3 acres on the northeast corner of Red Hill Country Club Drive and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-113-01 and 10; b. Approximately 3.5 acres on the southwest corner of Carnelian Avenue and San Bernardino Road - APN ~m_in?_na, M, na no i? .~~ ie. c. Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner of Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227- 211-24, 25 and 27; and d. Approximately 5 acres on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - ApN 229- 311-14 and 15. 3. Medium Residential to Commercial for; a. Approximately 11 acres on the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - portions of APN 208-311-23 and 24. b. Approximately 7.5 acres 175 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227-201-OB and 22, and portions of 227-201-07; and c. Approximately 5.5 acres 500 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of East Avenue - portions of APN 227-23-23. a33 ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSIO. STAFF REPORT GPA 81-03B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 26, 1987 Page 2 4. Low Residential to Commercial for approximately 9 acres 300 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the east side of Turner Avenue - APN 1077-601-OB and 10, and portions of 1077-601-02 and 04. 5. Industrial Park to Commercial for approximately 37 acres on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229-031-03 through 13 and 20. 6. To adjust the line between Medium Residential and Commmrclal in the block bordered by Foothill Boulevard, San Bernardino Road, Hellman Avenue and Klusman Avenue (see Exhibit "A" of the Resolution). Division line as shown is approximate. Precise location of land use divisions to be determined through the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I. BACKGROUND: The land use changes listed 1n this Ttem are actions necess a ed by the anticipated enactment of the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan (refer to Exhibit "A" of the Resolution). The General Plan Amendment will change land use designations for those properties along Foothill Boulevard proposed for change by the Draft Specific Plan. The General Plan must be amended before final approval of the Specific plan by the City Council. II. DISCUSSION: The Environmental Assessment of the General P1 an non is tied closely Lo the Environmental Review of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. For that reason, tt bas been determined that an expanded Environmental Impact Report, including the General Plan issues, is required, The EIR review period wTli end on August 18, 1987 and at the August 26, 1987 meeting, the Planning Commission may act on both the EIR and General Plan Intendment. III. RECOMMENDED ACTION: If the Planning Commission recommends cer ca on o e Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan 87-038 EIR, Tt is recommended that General Plan Amendment 87- 038 be approved through adoption of the attached Resolution. Rg~gectful~,y~{ tied, :.~/~Ya ~ ~~ BraQ/ ol>er~ City Planner i BB: AN:te Attachments: Resolution of Approval Exhibit "A" aay i Commissioner Chitiea commented on Mrs. Lundgren's mixed use piece. This plan should allow for the flexibility that is needed and promotes development and creativity. Commissioner Chitiea moved adoption of the plan as corrected with the information therein. Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion. Motion was unanimously carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: CCMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY * * * * * --carried D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 87-OB - CITY OF nmm~u ~wnnmwn - n raque a~ w amCnu uie Cana use nay ui cne nera an reflect land use changes proposed by the Footh111 Boulevard Specific Plan. (Continued from July 8, 1987). Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing, Commissioner Chitiea moved to continue Item D to the Auyust 26, 1987 Plannt ng Commission meeting. Commissioner Blake sley seconded the motion, Motion was carried by the following vote: MILJ• 1.1M9~1l iJlU1, L/,J• ~rlI, TIL!„ ULI,n 1.J4iY, ,ILA\• , Iviii ~L NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * * * --carried E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87-02 n amen men remove rom swan a pec c an approxiaately 57 acres of alnd on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue; approximately 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and approximately 14 acres of land on the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211.24,25 8 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 8 22-27, APN 227- 231-19,21,28,29,33 8 34, APN 229-311-14 8 15, APN 229-041-10, and portions of APN 227-231-16 6 23. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes - 9 - July 22, 1987 a3s~ RESOLNTION N0. 87-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. B7-036, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN NHEREAS, the Planning Lomnission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 87-03B. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the following n logs; A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use policies of the General plan. 8. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially 1niurious or detrimental to the adfacent properties. SECTION 2: The General plan Land Use Map shall be amended as follows: 1. Commercial to Office for 8.45 acres on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 2C' 011-4~ dnu 44. 2. Office to Commercial for: a. Approximately 3 acres on the northeast corner of Red Hill Country Club Ori ve and San 6ernardino Raad - APN 207-113-01 and 10; b. Approximately 3.5 acres on the southwest corner of Carnelian Avenue and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-102-03, 05, OB, 09, 12 and 19; c. Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner of Interstate 15 and Faoth111 Boulevard - APN 221-211-24, 25 and 27; and d, Approximately 5 acres on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Footh111 Boulevard - APN 229-311-14 and 15. 3. Medium Residential to Commercial for: a. Approximately 11 acres on the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - portions of APN 20&311-23 and 24. ~ 3(0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. GPA 87-03B -CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA August 26, 1987 Page 2 b. Approximately 7.5 acres 175 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227-201-OS and 22, and portions of 227-201-07; and c. Approximately 5.5 acres 500 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of East Avenue - portions of APN 227-23-23. 4. Low Residential to Commercial for approximately 9 acres 300 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the east side of Turner Avenue - APN 1077-601-08 and 10, and portions of 1077-601-02 and 04. 5. Industrial Park to Commercial for approximately 37 acres on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229-031-03 through 13 and 20. 6. To adjust the line between Medium Residential and Commercial in the block bordered by Foothill Boulevard, San Bernardino Road, Heilman Avenue and Klusman Avenue (see attached Exhibit"A"1. Division line as shown is approximate. Precise location of land use divisions to be determined through the FaothTll Boulevard Specific Plan. SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by e i y Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 87-038 to the City Council. APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 26TH OAY OF AUGUST, 1987. PLANNING COMAISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: a37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. GPA 87-038 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 26, 1987 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutlan was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CommlSSton of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cammisston held on the 26th day of August, 1987, by the following vote-to-wlt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHI TI EA, BLAKESLEY, EMERI CK, MCNI EL NONE TOLSTOY aag W; V ~ LLO OO v~ av <~ s G z LL~ LL O u N ~ ~ O p W V WV a 3 m 'a. = O ~ W ~ C~ ~; W aio o- •a~r n ¢~ G W W = J ' '~~ ' ' ` ~ 'a Al ~ W C7 O U LL LL T ^y 0 N ~ •anv a 0 v W U LL ~ LL ~Q O v 1! 3 •anv ua 3Atl PS ~ °z N ~ 0 ~ w ``MM j v V ~ A ~`I' E i*7 ~ M ppR~~7 .E'.~ F W z 0 ~z U ~ ~~ U .qMM O V z ~z~ Ufa a a~ AEBOLDTION NO. e ` / ~l v/ A RE80LIITION OF TH8 CITY COIINCZL OF TAB CZTY OF RANCRO CIICAMONGA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDNENT NO. 87-03H, AN ANBNDNENT TO TH8 LAND IIBE BLSlIBNT OF T88 GENERAL PLAN OF TH8 CITY OP RANCHO COCANONGA 11ZTH R88PECT TO CERTAIN R811L PROPERTY NORB SPECIFICALLY DESCRIRED EEREZN. A. Reoitala (i) On August 26, 1987, following a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. 87-148, thereby recommending that this Council adopt General Plan Amendment No. 87-03H with respect to that property described in this Resolution. (11) General Plan Amendment No. 87-OSH pertains to an amendment of the Land Use Element of the General Plan by amending the land use designations for those areas of real property more specifically described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (iii) On September 16, 1987, this Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, to consider the ....y .-i.... ~• .. o..m ur r uu euueuuu.eu~ ..u. e.-wo auu salu ~uuilu hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. H. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, the City C.ouncit hes rPViPwed, rcrt if ied and adopted a resolution with findings stating that the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 87-o3H 1 ~y0 Resolution No. Page 2 has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder and, further, that this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Report prior to the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 87-03B. 3. This Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with any existing goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan; and b. The proposed amendment is in harmony with the goals and policies of all related Elements of the General Plan; and c. The proposed amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent persona or properties. 4. This Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. s7-03B with respect to those properties outlined in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. ` ""~ .. ti ...a... ~..Si. ..~~~iiy Lu Lire nuuyLiuu ui this Resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1987. I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 19A7, by th? following vote: 2 aye Resolution No. Page 3 AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ASSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST• City Clerk oP the City of Rancho Cucamonga aye BRIIIBIT "A" 1. From Commercial to Office for 8.45 acres on the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-011-43 and 44. 2. From Office to Commercial for the property as follows: a. Approximately 3 acres on the northeast corner of Red Hill Country Club Drive and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-113-01 and 10; b. Approximately 3.5 acres on the southwest corner of Carnelian Avenue and San Bernardino Road - APN 207-102-03, O5, O8, 09, 12 and 19; c. Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner of Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24, 25 and 27; and d. Approximately 5 acres on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229-311-14 and 15. 3. From Medium Residential to Commercial for the property as follows: -• :.~. ~.r vi:+r..'.t~.lJ wCal ~.V LIICl UL Turner Avenue anduFOOthill ~BOUlevard - portions of APN 208-311-23 and 24. b. Approximately 7.5 acres 175 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227-201-08 and 22, and portions of 227-201-07; and c. Approximately 5.5 acres 500 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the west side of East Avenue - portions of APN 227-23-23. 4. From Low Residential to Commercial for approximately 9 acres 300 feet north of Foothill Boulevard on the east side cf Turner Avenue - APN tn77-601-08 and 10, and portions of 1077-601-02 and 04. 5. From industrial Park to Commercial for approximately 37 acres on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 229-031-03 and 13 a~i 20. 1 ava EZHIBIT "An (Coat.) To adjust tha line between Medium Residential and Commercial in the block bordered by Foothill Boulevard, San Bernardino Road, Hellman Avenue and Klusman Avenue (see attached Exhibit "1"). Division line as shown is approximate. Precise location of land use divisions to be determined through the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. o~ H :q T "1" to nAx nrmv nn. n ~ wrn vn nr rn , r•nwrn STAFF REPORT ~~'~ V~=.r of F O~~, ~ ~ 1977 GATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BV: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - The purpose of this ear ng s o cons er rev ew and approve the Specific Plan for the Foothill Boulevard area of Rancho Cucamonga. The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for the development of properties along Foothill Boulevard between Grove and Haven Avenues and between Lhe I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve e oo ulevard Specific Plan as amended from the previous meeting of September 8, 1987. iI. Ao~i ~iY:.T. iiiii ,cyuit iiiyiii iyiit5 ~i,c ii5uc5 iaiaeu u) ulc i.i l~ oun'C cil at the workshop meeting on September 8, 1987 and provides staff recommended amendments pursuant to City Council direction. III. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: On September 8, 1987 the City Council ra se concerns an gave policy direction on the following issues: 1. The Council felt it was appropriate to authorize restaurants with entertainment and/or serving of alcoholic beverages in the office designation of Subarea 1. The use matrix (Exhibit "A"1 has been amended to reflect this direction. The use listings in the land use regulations will be changed in the final document. Also, the Council requested a strengthening of the restaurant description to ensure *.hat oars and entertainment facilities are limited in scope when requested under restaurant operations. Staff suggests the following passage be added to Section 9 of the Plan: a v~ CITY COBNCIL STAFF REPDRT Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan September 16, 1987 Page 2 "9.1.2 Restaurants with Entertainment and/or Serving of Alcoholic vere~ages -- s u5T5i~s~ypified as a u sere ce n ng acility with manor portions of the floor area and business operations being devoted to the on-site preparation and consumption of food. Entertainment activities should be limited to ancillary support function which shall fora a minor part of the floor area and business operation. The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be in conjunction with restaurant usage and the availability of full listed menu items. The sale and serving of alcoholic beverages shall cease when such menu items are not available to customers." 2. The issue of retaining San Diego Avenue was discussed and the City Council requested the Specific Plan indicate the eventual abandonment of this street. Staff recommends the following section be added to the Plan: "7.1.5 San Diego Avenue Abandonment - San Diego Avenue/ n ernar no oad~s currently used as a short cut around Lhe Vineyard/Foothill intersection creating traffic impacts to the residents on the north side of San Bernardino Road. [n an effort to remec(y this situation it is the intention of this plan to have the City vacate San Diego Avenue and cul-de-sac •Ae ..e~4 ~wr ml~r1 ni ~~w O~.n ~..Ai ..O ".3d t.°. access to the properties which currently abut San Diego Avenue and the abandonment will include access provisions to San Bernardino Road and Foothiii Boulevard as part of any development plan at the following locations: a. At the point where San Diego Avenue currently intersects Foothill Boulevard; and, b. Northerly and southerly of the western extent of San Bernardino Road where the proposed cul- de-sac would be constructed. The abandonment shall be a condition of any dPVFinpm4nt proposal and access easement shall be provided in the abandonment agreements. (Refer to Exhibit "B" for diagram.) 3. It was requested Lhat in conjunction with the added flexibility provided in the approved non-conforming use section (new Section 9.1.4) an expanded public hearing notification mailing be required for subarea property owners involvement. Staff recommends the following be added to Section 8: .? y7 C1TY CDUNCIL STAFF REPDRT Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan September 16, 1987 Page 3 "8.1.11 Public Hearing and Notification - All public hearing an~noi:i'f ca oi-fi n requirements of the Development Code shall apply to the development within the Specific Plan area. In addition, the following requirements shall also apply to the public hearing notification process for properties within the Specific Plan area: a. Additional public notification is required of all property owners within the Specific Plan subarea in which the property under public hearing review is located." 4. In the implementation section, requests were made to: a. Strengthen the emphasis on the small business assistance program in order to encourage participation by existing businesses within Lhe corridor. ThTS has been added to the section as indicated in Exhibit 'C". b. Include a provision which references a procedural mechanism of the City with the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) for enactment of anticipated implementation plans with the RDA amendment. ThTS is also included in the implementation section, Exhibit 'C". 5. The Council questioned the need for an emergency access across the median island opposite Klusman Avenue, and also expressed an interest in the abandonment of this street between Estacia Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The Foothill Fire Prevention District has provided ,)ustificatian for the access point in a memo (Exhibit "D"). Also, in response to a Council request, Exhibit "E" has been provided which shows the median Island locations in this area with distances between Lhe island access points indicated by dimensions. Since the Specific Plan study did not address the potential of abandoning Klusman Avenue the Engineering staff does not have, at this time, sufficient information to analyze the pros and cons of this proposal. In addition the Specific Plan EIR does nn?, addre55 the poteatial impacts bf this abandonment. Therefore, staff recommends the following passage be added to the Appendix of the Plan for future study and consideration by the City: a~ y 8~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan September 16, 1987 Page 4 "Klusman Avenue - The City will investigate the po en~ial of^ abandonnent of Klusman Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Estacia Street in an effort to reduce anticipated traffic congestion in this area of Foothill Boulevard. M environmental review will be required as a part of the abandonment study." III. CONCLUSION: The above mentioned revisions have been made in response i:o City Council direction. If the Council concurs with the specifics of the changes it would be appropriate for the Specific Plan to be adopted as amended. The modifications as suggested in this report and those approved by the City Council at the September 8, 1987 meeLing will be incorporated into the final Plan before publication for public distribution. Resp lly su d, ra er City plan r nn•nv•eu•"~ Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Mended Land Use Matrix Exhibit "B" - San Oiego Abandonment Exhibit "C" -Implementation Section, Mended Exhibit "D" - Correspondence from Foothill Fire Prevention District Exhibit "E" - Median Island Map Draft Resolution av9 PFPoIITTFD pl® CMIITIgWL IHS: 5 ZI$1 96YH UI! JLYIa TMO SILYLY Thrl4 SllbarH Fpl Fletail ra.RCial UsK - 5C CC D ItT P SC CC D IHt SC CC m LfIR m U Nu CC IeIC Ifl LI IR Fwnitwe Stores N N M X X M K Nardxare St4K % M N % X Nubby Shays X K N X N K N N+ [ce Geaa Stores aM Soda Fgntains X X X X X X K N K N+ Janitorial 5RVicK and 9ppl ies X N N+ Jexelry StwK X% X X N z % K Laundry ISe1F SRVicel X K N fl M LeatAR Goads and Luggage StorK X X X N X N % X Liaya Stares O D D O D D 0 Messenger and Mire Services N M X X X N % %+ MKaG, Dance., and Mr4a1 Brts Studios 0 N D % D % N X NexspapR aM Maquine StorK X% N X N X N X% N N N+ NW series 6 fwdm Supply StoK adthin enclosed area N X N X X DFFIC@, fia61nK9 NKhIM dlle La~altR Coya;ent StorK N X N X N X N N N Paint, filass, and Mal lpapR StvK % N K K i Pet Shops N K z X N X X N+ Photocopy X% % N N X X N+ Ftecard and Tape BtvK N X % X % N K z N Mastawants (sit dom): al Mith mtertaimmt and/or serving of alcoholic bewagK D D D D D D D D D D hl Incidmti al serving a{ beR aM xine Ixithwt a cocktail huge, bar, mtertainamt, or dancingl N N D X N K% 0 D X z cl Cafe listed to ZO seats ~ linc uding atdoor seatin9ql N N X X z X N X N D % N dl Fast Food: xithwt tlrive'-thru D 0 D 0 D O D D with drive-thru 0 D D D 0 Shoe Styes, Sale and Repair z z X X % N% N X N Sperling Goods BtRK: al Speciatty~ bxkpackinngg, tennis, s~l iilg, aountain- eering fishing, etc. N z X N N z X X z h) fanera~q encoepassing a variety o{ spats equipamt N X X % N SupRaarkets N % N z N Sxlaai ng Pool Supplies X Y X X X iaiior Shops z % N % Televisim, Radio, VLR, StReo and CO Coagar,ent Sales N N X % N Toy Stores N N N X X N N X Variety Departamt Stores, Junior DepartaRnt Stores D X D N O X K N Veterinary (doerest¢l: al Non-boardf ng X 0 X 0 N % % % bl Boarding 0 0 D C D D Match a,d Cl ak flepair Styes N N %% N N N X N X Yardage F 15 StaK K X K % % a so ~ T •~• .•..........M. T... J. .~ __ .__~,~~ ~ r;' - i !' ~ '-- ~ 1 1, ____J ~; I ~ a~ I V ~~ ::'::_ I~ ~ 11~ 11 ' ~!~~ ~; ~) 8AN ~I[00 AVL AMNDONMp1T exeen ~~ a s~ 10.0 IMPLEMENTING SIIGTE6IES The following Implementing Strategies are actions which are beyond the power of this Specific Plan and their enactment will occur by "separate acts" following the adoption of this Specific Plan. 10.1 ECONOMIC DEYELOPIEMT SiNATE6IES: This section outlines the Economic Development strategy incorporated in this Specific Plan. These efforts are intended to provide the framework for financing area public and private improvements, which can bring the circulation and design components of the Plan Tnto reality and establish other mechanisms which will ultimately promote the viability of business activity along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. In following brief notes on the purposes of an economic development strategy, the discussion turns to five key components which constitute the economic blueprint for the planning area. Each component is described in terms of its rationale, potential phasing, private and public responsibilities, and appropriate funding sources. An Economic Development Strategy is but one part of the overall CnnrifSr Clan thni,nh it Sc rrnrial to arhiovi nn a lanA n<a nattorn which is viable in the marketplace while supporting the design objectives of the Plan. It is one of the focused blueprints for implementation of goals and objectives. In addition, ii functions as a coordinating device between such features as traffic, design image, and land use. Finally, it enumerates the various administrative and financial resources which will be required for effective implementation. Economic development covers just one of the many policy blueprints necessary to bring the Specific Plan's design, land use, and circulation sections into reality. Policies aimed toward retail and service land use, eventually wilt be evaluated not so much far their popular appeal, but whether or not Lhey were carried out in practice and strengthened the local community. Therefore, this strategy is groucded in the findings of an earliar - gnomic analysis conducted under this Specific Plan program and Tn~the goals and objectives established with citizen input. Finally, an Economic Development Strategy enumerates the conditions under which various types of public assistance may occur, It also specifies what Ts expected of both private and governmental participants in the implementation process. Because resources for implementation are always limited, it 1s essential to prioritize E><hibit 'C/1' d~~. objectives for the future and to reexamine these as time brings changes to the Rancho Cucamonga area. An underlying philosophy for economic development along the Foothtli Corridor is that commercial proposals should be initiated by the private sector. Local government participation primarily will be used to provide a receptive climate in response to those proposals and to install special mechanisms that foster private action among retail and service businesses. Implementation policies may be divided into two types; administrative mechanisms and financial incentives. Some changes in the administrative climate for economic development are generally necessary to make use of specific incentive devices. Moreover, local government policy should give priority to improving the climate for the local econoq rather than on the provision of financial subsidies. 10.1.1 REDEYELOPlE]IT PiiOJECT AREA AlE1Rl1EMT: 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga has supported the concept of ~ redevelopment through formation of a protect area that extends over I much of the study area lying between Vineyard Arenue and the I-15 I Freeway. The Redevelopment Agency has recently amended its original ( plan to include a provision for Foothill Boulevard improvements, I contemplating potential public participation in area where such anN ri~a_f inn mi nh~ hn fn n nnwl .• nlan Fnw awA Anal nn ~ ... ~... rnnnre awy rr°r-~ v r•-^ - •-r portions of the protect area. The amendment increases the agency ~ increment financing potential, its bonding capacity, and its time I limit for implementation. This plan amendment, when validated, will I provide the opportunity for the Redevelopment Agency to consider I targeting specific public actions commensurate with its ability to I finance the same. i Consideration of such options should commence with a special report to the Redevelopment Agency outlining areas of potential public involvement, potential costs and priorities, and such report should be considered by the Board within 90 days from the date of adoption of the Foothill Corridor Plan. This report will address such potential policy areas as: A. Participation in underwriting of certain Street and intersection construction and reconstruction in identified problem areas 8. Public design treatment as a positive force Exhibit 'C/Y as3 C. Elimination of physical obstacles to private redevelopment D. Public participation in parcel consolidation E. Joint public-private participation ventures F. Applicable financing programs G. Redevelopment program schedules The central a1n of this policy is to provide a mechanism for public participation in areas where public action is necessary to eliminate mayor obstacles to the proper developcent of the corridor and to help provide better physical relationships to encourage future economic investment. 10.1.2 IIFNILSIRUCTIIRE UPf~tADIM6: Creating an enhanced economic climate for Foothill Boulevard requires public sector caawitments as well as private activity. ThTS can include, where appropriate, such items as drainage improvements, street widening, and intersection reconstruction. Marking key entries to Rancho Cucamonga with "gateway" design elements is treated elsewhere in the Specific Ptan althouc,~ it is tied to other InFn ehn ran n naAann Storm drain and related flood control investments are the heart of the Specific Plan Infrastructure improvements. In order of possible phased development, specific improvements proposed for the plan area are: A. Hermosa Avenue area storm drain (from Deer Creek to Romona along Foothill) 5988,000 8. Archibald Avenue storm drain 52,943,000 C. Hellman Avenue storm drains, including connector with Cucamonga Channel 53,372,000 D. Foothill and East Avenue Si,@09,000 E. Etiwanda Creek area approximately 53.3 million Exhibit 'C/3' ~Sy Funding for improvements numbers "A" through "C" and "E" above can come from a Redevelopment Agency bond issue or a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. The Mello-Roos Act has became a significant method of financing public capital facilities serving new development through bond issues authorized by special taxes. Since the Etiwanda Creek area will be among the last land areas in the Specific Plan to undergo development, the City will continue its drainage fee collection system and will examine the possibility of either assessment district proceedings or a separate redevelopment bond issue as future land use needs are more clearly defined. 10.1.3 IICF-fIIYE PR06RN1 FOR SMALL-LOT CONSOLIDATION: The Specific Plan recognizes that problems of traffic congestion and marginal land use are often associated with a pattern of small commercial land parcels. Nighly fragmented ownership and land use arrangements also seriously hinder plans for renovation or expansion of businesses operating within such areas. Therefore, the Specific Plan encourages an incentive program for small-lot consolidation along the Foothill Corridor. Assistance to support lot consolidation would apply only under the following conditions: A. Three or more legal parcels are involved in the consolidation. AND None of the parcels alone exceeds one-half acre in size. AND C. Plans are submitted for a new development which exceeds the combined valuation of the land and improvements on the affected properties. The Redevelopment Agency can work with applicants on lot consolidation on public improvements within the pro,~ect area to stimulate eventual recycling of exfsting uses. These would be applied on a case-by-case basis, depending on the current pattern of development and the proposals submitted. In addition, the Ctty will consider potential property acquisition for common parking areas to provide additional development potential for properties with difffcuit site constraints. Appropriate target areas for this program are sites between Grove and the railroad undercrossing, from Hellman to Klusman, and between Turner and Center. Exhibit 'C/4' ass 10.1.4 ATTRACTION OF HIGH SALES YOLUE/MARKET VOID USES: A market analysis prepared during this Specific Plan process identified a number of retail and Service activities which are underrepresented in the Foothill Corridor. Efforts to attract these land uses should be aside to the extent that they would compliment rather than compete directly with land uses planned for the Victoria Gardens mall and its iaaiediate surroundings. This will be an ongoiag implementation activity, having a greater potential for positive results after infrastructure improvements are in place and local populations rise than if tackled early in the life of the Specific Plan. Hence, attracting prominent businesses need not 6e given a high priority until one to two years after the plan is adopted. Types of businesses which would be targets of the marketing effort Include high sales tax and employment generators. In order for this economic development program to 6e successful, Tt will be necessary to make Specific Plan area sites more attractive to private investment than sites in the immediate vicinity of the regional matt. The use of the redevelopment process and land assembly (with available funds) mdy need to be a part of this effort. 10.1.5 INITIATE A 9UILL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PR06RAM: New business promotion and redevelopment activity do not mean that the needs of existing Foothill Corridor retail and service outlets will be neglecteC. The Specific P1 an is committed to strengthen the operation of those firms which are viable contributors to serving neighborhood and community-wide consumer demands. In order to assist the small business sector, the Redevelopment Agency will work toward establishing a program for use by businesses to finance facade upgrading and on-site improvements. The program would be open to owners of commercial property and loans would be available for up to 80 percent of the authorized improvements, not to exceed 550,000.00 per property. Interest rate on the loan shall be prime rate. ---'1 Note: This program was approved by the City's RederelopmeiK Agency on I August 19, 1987, and will became operational concurrently witA I the adoption of this Plan. Existing businesses in the corridor ~ K area are encouraged to investigate the feasibility of upgrading i of their facilities 1n acrnrdance rlth the ob~ectA~oa of this I Plan. I ___J Exhibit 'C/5' ash The criteria for improvements to be eligible for the Business Assistance Program are as follows: o That improvements promote and are not in conflict with the goals and obiectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. o Eligible improvements may include costs to repaint, re-stucco, re-roof, upgrade landscaping, resurface parking facilities, or other minor on-site upgrading. o That all facade and on-site Tmprovements are approved through the Design Review process. e That improvements for non-conforming uses and structures provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. o Addition of new building and site features (not to include additional floor or parking area) which reduce the degree of non-confonaity of existing features is encouraged under this program. Other small business assistance programs which the City can investigate includes the establishment of a local development corporation 1n conjunction with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Conwerce. Seed money fnr cuch a venture is availahlo thrnu~h Community Oevel opment Block Grant Section 108 provisions and the Small Business Administration 504 Program. The function of this nonprofit organization would be to stimulate the health and expansion of small businesses through low-interest loans or grants. This funding would support: building construction leasehold improvements renovation and modernization machinery and equipment land acquisition COBG and Small Business Administration regulations each set the criteria for firms that may receive financial aid. For example, eligible businesses must have a net worth of less than S6 million and be the actual user of assets purchased with loan funds. The concept of "shared risk" is advanced as the SBA program will provide loans only up to 40 percent of protect costs; owner equity and conventional Sank/private sector lending must make up the remainder. Exhibit 'C/6' ~S'J 10.1.6 PitdDTE NOUSIR6 OPPDRTIMITIES 511PPORTIYE OF CONERCIAL LARD A strong retail and service sector along any major traffic artery draws its lifeblood from local and subregional consumer patronage. Both the business community and local government must work diligently to promote shopper use of the Foothill Corridor ever other alternative destinations. Part of that strategy involves bringing more residents to the corridor vicinity because existing and planned businesses cannot rely exclusively on through traffic for their viability. The commercial intensity recommended for Foothill Boulevard presents Rancho Cucamonga with a most ambitious land use target to achieve. Attracting patrons from Upland and western Fontana to Foothill businesses is not likely to provide a sufficient base of support. Therefore, the City should promote housing development on those properties designated for residential use along the corridor and adjacent areas. Medium Residential land uses are appropriate densities for consideration with the bordering Low Density neighborhoods and as an aid to the business sector viability. 10.2 SI611 AID SIREET FURNITURE MAIRIEIIIYR:E DISiRICT: The City should consider the establishment of a Maintenance Assessment District for the Foothill Corridor which will accumulate flln Ac LO imnrnva anA m.~i nfatn m,hli~ end nt.,~~_ N.... +.d appurtenances. fie funds will be accumulated by~chargtng~a~special fee for signs in the Foothill Corridor. The fee would he charged at the design review building permit stage. 10.3 FOOTHILL CORRIDOR COLOR COORDINATION: In order to induce design continuity along the Foothill Corridor, the City will begin a painting and clean-up program. All appropriate sign hardware, street furniture, poles, barriers, signal signs and related objects in the public right-of-why of Foothill Boulevard Tn the study area shall be painted a distinctive and consistent color. 10.4 CITT SI6N PROORAM- In those areas designated as key locations for City signs, (as discussed in the Design Pian) the City should proceed to negotiate a least cost use of private property (i.e., lease, acquisition, etc.). Exhibit 'C/7' ~S 8' •-RECEIVED- G7Y OF FANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING nIVISiGN FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT >ka l . 1y87 AN PM MEMORANDUM 7181yI101ll~;~ 11 X213141516 TO: Alan Warren FROM: Lloyd Almand, Division Chief/Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan - Klusman/Foothill Intersection DATE: September 10, 1987 At the special council meeting held on September 8, 1987, a request was made by the council for written justification from the fire district as to why a median break should be allowed at Klusman and Foothill. At the same time, a statement was made indicating one councilman's preference to close Klusman Avenue. After discussing the request with the personnel at Station 2 (San Bernardino Road and Klusmanl, the personnel who respond the emergency equipment through the intersection in question, they offered the following statements, which reflect their position on the critical issue. "858 to 908 of our calls at Station 2 the fire units respond down Klusman and onto Foothill Boulevard. Probably 608 of these times we go down Klusman, we go east on Foothill." "Responding on a regular basis from San Bernardino Road to Archibald, in our opinion, would be creating an avoidable hazard. '-'here is just too much congestion in this area to constantly expose the public to the potential hazard of emergency apparatus trying to get to an emergency. In this one area (intersection) there is a gas station, a dairy, a shopping center, a school, a school bus barn and a major intersection (Foothill/Archibald)." "Closing the access we have from Klusman to Foothill would require the truck company to travel by way of Archibald to Foo *_hill or San Bernardino Road to Hellman, then south to Foothill. The intersection of Foothill and arvh iba7d __ _ _xtr_.,e ~, bum ^tcroccticr. rd is avoided by our unitQ as cmuch as ypossible to relieve the problems created by our units and to increase the safety to our units during response." "Klusman and Foothill has the best visibility for code 3 runs." as9 ElOIOR 9/1' Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Septemher 10, 1987 Page Two "AS an apparatus operator (both truck and pumper), I know first hand that the xlusman access is utilized in approximately 808 of our responses. The reasons I utilize it in my responses are as follows: "It's easy access from the station Dote Foothill (in both travel directions)." "It is relatively congestion free (i.e. children, pedestrians, dogs and cars, while responding)." "It offers high visibility while responding both to "be seen" and "in seeing". "It is a street that is wide and generally free of water flow in our "rainy season" (as opposed to Hellman) and does not hamper emergency traffic." "it is a street with relatively few residences to be disturbed by our siren and air horns." "It offers good access from the station for the ladder truck - both visibility and for the space it requires while turning." There were also several general comments regarding the installation of the median islands along Foothill Boulevard. "Regarding islands on Foothill - response times on Foothill will be increased by islands which would limit our ability to move to the left (our escape route). Even a slight delay could mean life or death to a seriously ill or injured person or the difference between a small fire turning into a much larger incident." "The truck company is a very large piece of equipment and a median, as proposed, would necessitate continuing to the next intersection where a "U" turn would be required in traffic (often very heavy traffic) in order to return to an address we would not normally have had to pass, but turn directly into the property." "ii an island is a "must" for this city, i request some type of "cross-over" every few hundred yards and at all. cross streets (these need to accommodate the ladder truck also). There is nothing more frustrating tha r. to have an incident "across the stree~ and in view" and have to expend that "extra time" to go around the block to get there." a~0 O eO~R 'D/~' Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan September 10, 1987 Page Three "AS an emergency apparatus operator, I'm opposed to the island idea for the simple fact that with the added traffic population in our city, many times as not, the middle lane of Foothill is my only alternative as a travel lane while on an emergency response (and as we all know our response time in many instances is a life and death factor)." One of our officers concluded his justifications by adding the following poignant statement: "I sincerely hope that th=_ city looks at this + «,~~ from not only the aesthetic value, but the practicality of our agency's responses through the crowded streets of Rancho Cucamonga and the fact that traffic is only going to qet worse as more individuals move into our community." i sincerely hope that the statements which have beer. presented to you and which reflect the actual facts of the situation in question, will persuade you to make a decision that will not adversely affect the effectiveness or efficiency of our responding emergency apparatus. The entire administrataive staff of the Foothill Fire Protection District agrees strongly with the statements made by our emergency response personnel. For the city to reply with anyrh;nn ~~~: th_n - ~ uenn recommended would imply an acceptance of liability by uthe city, of which the fire district will have no part. we strongly urge your support and consideration of measures that would create median island breaks ir. order to mitigate delays in emergency response times. a ~, / ex~nar rois~ Z W ' w J z N z - r < w = p 6 O w O o ~ 2 N p ~ N W ~ O U O w U N f ~ ® ~ N e V t U .. N _ T ~ U ~ C y v ~ ~ W N 9 E ~ u a - u ~ v ~ .- a- c 3 a a SQ L Z LO r U O J Z Q W EXHElIT 'E' R88OLDTION NO. a ( ~~~'S A RSSOLDTION 08 T88 CITY CODNCIL OF T88 CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONOA APPROVING T8E FOOTHILL HODLEVIIRD HPHCIPZC pLAN. A. ReCital3. (i) On April 3G, 1987, May 18, 1987, June 24, 1587, July 8, 1987 and July 22, 1987 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings concerning the recommended adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "FSP"). On July 22, 1987, following the conclusion of the continued public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 87- 120, thereby recommending that this Council adopt and approve the FSP. (ii) The FSP comprises approximately 560 acres located generally adjacent to Foothill Boulevard between the westerly city limits on Grove Avenue to the Deer Creek Channel and between the I-15 Freeway and the easterly city limits, all as referenced on the Land Use Plan Map, Section 9.0, of the FSP text. (iii) Attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, is a full, true and correct copy of the FSP. (ivj vu JtllJ LC11WeL io, lyn ,, cnis council conaucted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the adoption of the FSP and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, this Council has reviewed, certified and adopted a resolution with findings stating that the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment No. 87-o3B has been completed in compliance with th_ California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines 1 ac~3 Resolution No. Page 2 promulgated thereunder and, further, that this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Environmental Impact Report in conjunction with the adoption of the FSP. 3. Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, this Council has adopted a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 87-03H. With the adoption of said General Plan P.mendment, the FSP is in conformance with all elements of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. This Council hereby finds that the FSP has been drafted to include, in text and accompanying diagrams, all of the information as follows: a. The distribution, location and extent of the land uses, including open space, within the area covered by the FSP; b. The proposed distribution, location, extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area of the FSP and needed to support the land uses Angn.i~~T _C tF.c Fem., c. The standards and criteria by which development will proceed for land uses within the FSP and standards for the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources where applicable within the area of the FSP; and d. A description of the program of implementation measures, including regulations, programs, public works projects and financing measures necessary to carry out those provisions referenced in subparagraph a., b. and c. above, within the area of the FSP. 5. This Council hereby adopts the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, marked as Exhibit "A," attached hereto and inccrporated herein by this reference. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ~~~ Resolution No. Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1987. 2, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of _ , 1987, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: M11 L.11: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga S\131\RESOLCC\ 3 .( ~O S CITY OF RANCAO CL`CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Septemoer 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner c~c^^+o .tP } ~~. ~ n t D C LL. y QQ A y!I U h inn I BY: Cynthia 5. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN - n amen n o remove rom a swan a pec is an approximately 57 acres of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue; approximately 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and approximately 14 acres of land on the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24, 25 and 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 and 22-27, ADN 227-231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 and 34, APN 229-311-14 and 15, ADN 229-041-O1, and portions of APN 227-231-16 and 23. I. RECOMMENDATION: At its meeting of July 22, 1987, the Planning omm sZ~ o~comlxended that the City Council approve Etiwanda SDecific Ptan Amendment 81-02. If the Council concurs, adoption of the attached Ordinance would be appropriate. lI. BACKGROUND 6 DISCUSSION: A portion of the Foothill Boulevard pec c an area a ween the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue is currently regulated by the Etiwanda Specific Plan (E.S.P.) (see Ordinance Exhibit "A"). In anticipation of adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, these properties along Foothill Boulevard should be deleted from the Etiwanda Specific Plan to avoid overlapping of development regulations. Action on this amendment should wait until the City Council adopts the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Staff believes that the findings listed in the draft Ordinance can be made in conjunction with the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan actions. III. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission, at its mea +ng n •u y , held a public hearing to consider an amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Commission resolved to recommend approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 87-02 to the C1 ty Council. ~~o (o CITY COUNCIL STAfF REPORT RE: ESPA 87-02 Septesber 16, 1987 Page 2 Respe~tty sub ted, City Pl~ner BB:CK:ko Attachments arp ~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c~~"^+oyc STAFF REPORT ~ ~.~ ~~~ ~ I> t977 DATE: July 22, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROlBiENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN amen n o remove rom a wan a pec c an approximately 57 acres of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue; approximately 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Etiwanda gvenue and Foothill Boulevard; and approximately 14 acres of land on the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24, 25 d 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 8 22-27, APN 227-231-19, 21, 28, 29, 33 8 34, APN 229-311-14 8 15, APN 229-041-10, and portions of APN 227-231-16 d 23. Y. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: A Dortton of the Foothill Boulevard pec c an area a ween the I-15 Freewav and East Avenue is currently regulated by the Etiwanda SDecific Plan (E. S. P.) (see Exhibit "A"). In anticipation of adoption of the Foothill Boulevard SDecific Plan, these properties along Foothill Boulevard should be deleted from the Etiwanda SDecific Plan to avoid overiapping development reguiations. Action on this amendment should wait until the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to the City Council. Further, the adoption recommendation of the E.S.P. Amendnent should be conditioned upon final City Council adoption of the Foothill Plan. Staff believes that the findings listed in the draft Resolution can be made 1n con,lunction with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan actions. II. RECDP4AENDpTION: It is reconenended that the Planning Commission reconmen3-approval of the Etiwanda SDecific Plan Amendment 87-02 by Lhe adoption of the attached Resolution. a~ ~ ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION _~'AFF REPORT RE: ESP 87-02 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 22, 1987 Page 2 Respe fully submitted, Br e City anner BB:AN:ko Attachments: Exhibit °A" Resolution Na. ~-2 (0 9 CRAM :~i::i: =i~:::i ;. :~^I S ~J ~: ~'v'j.~"-J ONLY Commissioner Chitiea commented on Mrs. Lundgren's mixed use piece. This plan should allow for the flexihility that is needed and promotes development and creativi ty• Commissioner Chitiea moved adoption of the plan as corrected with the information therein. Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion. Motion was unanimously carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITI EA, ENERICK, MCNI EL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY x . w . D. --carried M1/V,VfIV I.VI.MIVI,If/1 /, IY IIYC~I W YINCIIU 1.IR' LOIIU U>C r1Yp Yr 411C nera an reflect land use changes proposed by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. (Continued from July 8, 1987). Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea moved to continue Item D to the Auyust 26, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. Comm ssioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYFi fnMMISSiONFRS• f.N 1TiFA RI AKFCI FY FMFR1 f.N Mr.N iFl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE . + ... --carried E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ET[NANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87-92 - - n ame7l~~n mend"remove rom swan a peel c an approxfamtely 51 acres of alnd on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue; approximately 5 acres of land on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and approximately 14 acres of land on the southwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 227-211-24,25 8 27, APN 227-221-01-03, 07-09, 14 8 22-27, APN 227- 231-19,21,28,29,33 8 34, APN 229-311-14 8 15, APN 229-041-10, arld portions of APN 227-231-16 8 23. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. Planning Commission Minutes - 9 - July 22, 1987 J . .~~il.( 7 70 RESOLUTION N0. 87-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECpMENDIN6 APPROVAL OF ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN (E. S. P.) AMENDMENT 87-02 REOUESTIN6 LAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF f00THILL BOULEVARD BETNEEN THE I-15 FREENAY AND EAST AVENUE, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ANO ET[NANDA AVENUE, ANO THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE BE DELETED FROM THE E.S.P. NHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1987, an application was filed and accepted on the above-described pro,~ect; and NNEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning CommNsslon has Wade the following-findings: 1. That the subject proyerties are part of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as recomwended for approval by the Planning Comwission; and 2. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed Foothill Specific Plan in terms of access, size, and conpatib111ty with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 3. That the proposed district change would not have significant Impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 4. That the proposed district change is in confornwnce with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on July 22, 1987. NON, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Govornmont Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 22nd day of July, 1981, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendma?nt No. 87-02 for the area to be removed from the Etiwanda Specific Dl an as indicated on Exhibit "A" ail PLANNING COMIISSION RESOLUTION N0. ESP 87-02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga July 22, 1987 Page 2 2. The Planning Conmission hereby recamaends that the City Council approve and adopt Etiwanda Specific Plan gnendment No. 87-02 subfect to the City Council adoption of: a) General Plan Amendment No. 87-030; and b) Foothill Boulevard Specific Dl an. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TNIS 22ND DAY OF DAY, 1987. PLANNING COSl1ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA 8Y 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly lniroaucea, passes, ana aaoptea oy the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comm{551on held on the 22nd day of Juiy, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: RYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, HCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE A85ENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 27~ ^:°+~ Areas to be removed from the Etiwanda Specific Plan (E.S.P.) /~ NORTH CITY OF ITEM: E ~ B~ °1 g•oz RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EaHISIT:_.L,BCALE: '- 213 ~~tS~ Area to be removed from the :~h Industrial Specific Plan (I.S.P.) ORDINANCE N0. 3 ~d AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETINANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (E. S. P.1 87-02 REQUESTING LAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETNEEN THE I-15 FREENAY AND EAST AVENUE, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ETINANDA AVENUE, AND THE SOUTNNEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVENUE BE DELETED FROM THE E.S.P. NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucaaanga City Council has made the following findings: 1. That the sub,iect properties are part of the Foothill Boulevard Specific P1 an as recommended for approval by the Planning Coamiission. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve and adopt Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 87-02 subfect to the City Council adaptton of: A. General Plan Amendment 87-038; and B. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 2. That the subiect property is suitabie for the uses permitted in the Proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in terns of access, size, and compatibil{fy with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 3. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and 4. That the proposed district change is to conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends Issuance of a Negative Deciaratlon on ,luly 22, 1987. NON, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED: 1. That the City Council adopted General Plan Amendment 87- 038 and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on September 16, 1987. any CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. ESPA 87-02 September 16, 1987 Page 2 2. That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by taw and duly heard and has determined that the properties on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue, the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, and the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue as indicated in Exhibit "A" be deleted from the Etiwanda Specific Plan. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause a sane to be published within fifteen (15) after its passage at least once in The Da11y Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California and circulated 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~~S Areas to be removed from the Etiwanda Specific Plan (E.S.P.) /~ NORTH CITY OF ITEM: ~ ~ ~~ • Oz RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION ERHIBIT: A SCALE: - 2 l to ~. ~. Area to be removed from the '~"Y Industrial Specific Plan (LS.P.) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mdyor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Butter, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner ~;,~~cn.yo'yc j e > ,T IA (-i~~ Q Z V '> 19n SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - - n amen men remove rom e n us r a pec c an approximately 80 acres of land on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwa nda Avenue - APN 229- 031-01-16 and 20 and portions of APN 229-021-57 and 59. I. RECOrMENDATION: At its meeting of July 22, 1987, the Planning ommission recomended that the City Council approve Industrial Specific plan Amendment 87-01. If the Council concurs, adoption of the attached Ordinance of Approval would be appropriate. 1I. BACKGROUND 8 DISCUSSION: The portion of land in the Foothill ou evar pec is an area on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue (see Ordiance, Exht bit "A"1 is currently regulated by the Industrial Area Specific Plan (I. S.P. 1. Upon adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the industrial land along Foothill DV Uicr did aIlUY1J ue JCIC LBU II1NN Llle I.J.P. iAl aVUld Lfle overlapping of development regulations. Ac tt on on this amendment should wait until the City Council adopts Lhe Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Staff believes that the findings listed in the attached Ordinance can be made in conjunction with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan actions. III. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission, at its mee Ing o u y held a public hearing to consider an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan. The Commission resolved to recommend approval of industrial Specific Plan Amendment 87-01 to the City Council. Re suevtfully milted, i f-. ,i ra ul r City P1 nn eB:CK:ko Attachments ~1~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~u~a+oyc STAFF REPORT ~~' '.~ °~ ~ J ~ Ij 1917 DATE: ,luly 22, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Alan Marren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - n amen n o remove rom e n us r a rea Specific plan approximately 80 acres of land on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229-031-01-16 d 20 and portions of 229-021-57 8 59. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The portion of land in the Foothill ou evar pec c an on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue (see Exhibit "A") is currently regulated by the Industrial Area Specific Plan (I. S. P. ). [n anticipation of adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan, the industrial land along Foothill Boulevard should be deleted from the I.S.P. to avoid overlapping development regulations. Action on this amendment should watt until the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to the City Council. Further, the adoption recommendation should be conditioned upon City Council adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Staff believes that the findings listed in the draft Resolution can be made in conjunction with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan actions. II. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission reco~approval of I.S.P. Amendment 87-01 by the adoption of the attached Resolution. Res/pestfully suhml tted, A ~ iii i i Bra B ler City Tanner BB:AW:ko Attachments: Exhibit "q" Resolution No. ~7 8 ITEM F Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, Chairman NcNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Lhitiea moved approval of the resolution. Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHiTIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY s w . w . . --carried F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87- uI - clrr of RAmmcnu cucAMDwfsA - An amenamrent to remove rrom ine n us ria rea pec c an approximately 80 acres of land on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 229-031-01, 16 d 20 and portions of 229-021-51 d 59. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presente4 the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Since there were no public comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Blakesley moved approval of the resolution, Commissioner Chi tiea seconded the motion. Motion carried by the foliowi ng vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: (iLAKESLEY, CHITI EA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE RESENT: COMMISSIONERS; TOLSTOY . x . .. . -carried G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 5996 - DAVID su Iv son o acres o an n o parce s in ery ow dwelling units per acre) Residential Development D1strlct located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east of Mayberry Avenue - APN 201-181-59. Related File YA 87-08. H. VARIANCE 87-08 - DOWDEN - A request to reduce minimum lot depth and minimum ne average o area for a 2 acre parcel fn the Very Law Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located ont he south side of Nilson Avvenue, east of Mayberry Avenue - APN 201-181-59. Related File TPM 5996. Planning Commission Minutes - 10 - July 22, 1987 a~9 RESOLUTION N0. 37-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CgMI55i0N RECOMMENDING APPROYAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (I. S. P.) AMENDMENT 87-01 REQUESTING LAND ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEYARD BETNEEN THE I-15 FREENAY AND ETINANDA AYENUE BE DELETED FROM THE I.S.P. WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1987 an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Goverment Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comntssion has made the following~gs: 1. That the subject properties are part of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. 2. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed Foothill Specific plan in terms of access, size, and campatlbiiity with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 3. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 4. That the proposed district change Ts in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recomends issuance of a Negative Declaration on July 22, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Governnk!nt Code, that the planntng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 22nd day of July, 1987, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 87-01 for the area to be removed from the Industrial Area Specific Plan as indicated on Exhibit "A". ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. RE: ISP-87-O1 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 22, 1987 page 2 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Cf ty Council approve and adopt Industrial Area Specific Dlan Amendment No. 87-01 subject to the City Council adoption of: a) General Plan Amendment No. 87-038; and b) Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 3. Thai a Certified Copy of thts Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COhIlISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e ~, ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 2 ~- I Areas to be removed from the Etiwanda Specific Plan (E.S.P.) CITY OF RANCHO ./~~. NORTH 1SP 8'9,01 ITEM: E.ST' Est • oz CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: H SCALE: ~g~ ;; ~. Area to be removed from the ~~r, Industrial Specific Plan (LS.P.) ORDINANCE N0. 3 a/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCIq CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (I. S. P.) AMENDMENT 87-01 REQUESTING LAND ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL 80ULEYARD BETNEEN THE I-15 FREENAY AND ETINANDA AVENUE 8E DELETED FROM THE L S.P. NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamnga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamnga City Council has awde the following findings: 1. That the subject properties are part of the Foothill Boulevard SDectfic Plan as recoamiended for approval by the Planning Coa~lssion. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve and adopt Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 87-01 subject to the City Council adoption of; A. General Plan Amv?ndment 87-038; and B. Foothill Boulevard Specific plan 2. That the subject property is suitable for the uses peemitted Tn the proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 1n terms of access, size, and caapat1bi111~y with existing land use in tho a,rrnunAlnn araa• anA 3. That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and 4. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamnga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on July 22, 1987. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; 1. That the City Council adopted General Plan Amendmnt 87- 038 and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan on September 16, 1987. 2g3 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. ISPA 87-01 September 16, 1987 Page 2 2. That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and has determined that the properties on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between the I-15 Freeway and Etlwanda Avenue as indicated an Exhibit "A" be deleted from the Industrial Area Specific Plan. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause a same to be published within fifteen (15) after its passage at least once 1n The Da11y Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~ 8y •° Areas to be removed from tha Etiwanda Spsciflc Plan (E.S.PJ /~ NORTH CITY OF ITE1[: 'ESA 8~ • oz RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: A SCALE: - ass' r~ Aree to be removed from the 1R4s Industrial Specific Plan (LS.P.) - CITY OF RANCHO CIICAIDIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner ,;cc~,uoy ~~ Cy ~I "= '_ ..r. ~i3 ~" A F~,' ~ ',Z .., ",> 1917 SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 1986-87 GRANTEE YLI{r uwl'Infa,G wGYVKI - weVlew or BLOCK Grant Program per ornwnce ur ng fiscal year 1986-87 and approval of the Grantee Performance Report for submission to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by September 30, 1987. RECgMENDATION: Staff requests that the 1986-87 Conmunity eve opmen ock Grant Grantee Performance Report (GPR) be approved and the report and Resolution of Approval be submitted to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to September 30, 1987. [I. BACKGROUND: In accordance with the requirements of the United a es epartment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), staff and the consultant, Cotton/Beland/ Associates, have prepared a Grantee Performance Report for the 1986-87 Community Development Block Grant Program. A copy of the report is attached. The purpose of the annual Grantee Performance Report is for the City and HUD to evaluate the use of Block Grant funds and the status of programs for which funds were allocated. During fiscal year 1986-81, expenditures far Biock Grant protects showed significant progress. o Housing rehabilitation loans and grants were again issued to low and moderate income homeowners throughout the City. Construction was completed on both North Tewn Streets Phase IV (Acacia/Belmont) and the west side of Turner Avenue, also a North Town proi ect. During the year, ma.ior steps were taken toward the development of a park in North Town and the resolution of a drainage problem in the area. The park site has been acquired (on Feron Boulevard across from Lhe Junior High School) and work is underway to install the storm drains necessary to permit development of the park. CDBC funds are being used for a portion of the storm drain and construction of improvements on the east side of Turner Avenue. ~D CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPDRT Comounity Development Block Grant September 16, 1987 Page 2 o CDBG funds help support Senior Shared Housing, a Camamnity Service Program, offered by Inland Mediation Board. o Several pro,~ects have been completed which have remaining funds available for reprogramming. A recommendation for reprograawing was approved at the August 19, 1987 meeting of the City Council. o The Grantee Perforamnce Report review indicated a difference in the way the City and County accounts are kept for the Housing Repair and Rehabilitation contracts. Because of the City committment to the housing rehabilitation program the City records have been agiusted to conforw with the County system. There has been no change 1n the amount expended. The amount of the unobligated balance for the 1986-87 rehabilitation program has been increased to cover the balance of the cumulative contracts with the County from fiscal 1982-83 through fiscal 1986-87. Thn r._ntee n~s~ ~'rL: ^~p~rt iRdi:.ato "ut tic "cyui~vu ud~ieiii to low and moderate income residents has been attained, the goal of fair housing furthered, and the comamnity has benefited from these Block Grant proiects. III. PUBLIC REV(EN: Federal regulations require a duty noticed public Augrst %{p~~ eprogramming decisions. Notice was published on 4 /// _ i ~ Respects 1 i ted, ~' ~ ~y Otto K~outii ' DeQuty City Dlanner OK:MB:vc Attachments a~~ Grantee Perlormance Report 6.s o.p.nmaaa «w«pq ~\ Ira u.nn o.«w«nanl cpr-,mrmro oe+eropmenl ~~ Bmcx Gor! Plogum GMB Nn YA6C0EE lErO IWJI'k City of Rancho Cucamonga - I 8-86-MC-05-0556 -_W __._ ..L o- r.,. w«.,,,w„r l.,,+P.. -___ ~ M 9320 Base Line Road Mi ki Bratt Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 __ i' "°m^`" ` -~~ (714) 989-18fi1 . e RnMrl Cons sts nl Ine Follnwrn9 Forms Showing P rogress AchreveO IDrouyh JyRe._dO~ 19@7 rn.rn nn '. 4,n.r .ary . o. J9q: >d.5.r. di- Irl ldnE PdrI II HUO a9J9 Ji .. n A!P~' Bn^P' 11'ICIdSnael RJO J919 J.r~ . i ~ Fi ril. 4`,I.'I III r;r,)11JJ I, .. ]'I .: B.n.rn is L.Ins ieuU J9:95.. -'^ rlr„'•^nnmiv FUnner Fart ppusng mV0 J9J9 Gr , I r.r lu. IrrJ9 !. ..~.~ .i r•."....;~•I'F[r f^'~".~r~r^IGr.rnlee Vwlurmy'..e PelwR lntnu[Ign3 lw prMaM<MCC+WeVp IM GVRI ' r nPpOrl A'S0 COP.IainS .r r .aa. nr r!a nr mu q•antne cl Inn rNalmnynrp of Ine use CI Cpmmumly Oerelopmenl 91aok GuN IeOayl lunOS Ip' . r ~a.nl~ ~PC wmm n'IV nemrpomem oolece.es ^> Lv .»ai OpIPUirPS .rn cn reoprre Inn eaen eoee avmoam~u+ny mp« enl,er e«wm low one moeerne rnconn Der. ..'. , a ~n I^e orermupn col ei,mmalmn m npms or errym, or « con.npnny neea. nawny a nrtral« uryercy. ana dr, cp;en~re wmcn leprlrtes Ina n Ine ayolegale al leaar sr percem of su cove woos e.D.pMe Epnro me pro. ... ...._ ._._._ .......r . __,.,:...:.... ..,., ,....... ...r .,,.,,... .. .,:.....r...,....,.~.r......rrr r.,..rr.. ' d d 3i. 5 r .., n f r a IPP S t'".Srdm aClnClires dn0 r ev „ • rl '• r ~ 5 .r ~91ain d9 a rP9ull nl rl3 e+pnlipp[PS anE a . r , '•m, s nr~ rr ur me grdnlen Pn r nrzrpram nom carz«n n m rvn5ercupn. - u 9'IeP 5 AelnpoEPd OlLpal RPDIPSenlallve Catl Dies illdl' ' ~~ r ilil In nr .. r"na v .l^ms 5.m.f Eap^rr . '^. ~ ,.r., .~„r ann ne'PIn=,.na ~n ln~s lepml ls,rpe one cplrecr as of m•mror ~rar in; ammi~i gal iocas` lini ~~il i~orrori to P~or~mu n lI ae.em~n', noee~ri~ei eamhwaine iP:`al°iu<n i~ooon .. • asi nl D'e mnsl wtrnu+wropmuE coeu2 propnm real waxnrnc s«6on Iwl of tole Se of me uo6m unn coe. rcmm~w rwh ne cndr;lw Dlvtee«H Mall.pq'r w nM 1«ey«rw ~. - - n r~r. re Pro.raaa, anwno «n« Innp., In.l «no.,'«~ n..xw4 w.pnmlr +Ixn «pn.. IaeleaMl ««rn u.n:isii i~enniee:rn~ia ~ulam<"°: ma~lilo.rioow mlrep rm.n«rxnxnwipn.elnrra w+a.D«r««n«.a.lw~ralna + pmm~ rw5 own m.n xn re« eon. Dennis .. Stout, Hager MSP1sLL515ae1 N CfR vart SN 6116 65tp i ags a - a ' ~ _ ~ i / ~ l ~ p ~a g c v ...tiv ... g j v o o A° n e ~ o n ~S ~ r ~ N"n n6 $n ~ I a i n 4 a~ 1~ Gld • ~L i-L + I Z~{ i N ~ < +i ~ ~ ~+ O~~ A G L > m ~ ~ u N 3 egF O1°m ~a9 ~m~: X' a N ^ g H p ~~ J p 3 ~ ~ ~ p O t uS YT JO ~ S N y~ ~n ~ 0 v m ~ a a n ~ '" 3. ' ~ ~= s ~a n S ~ m ° o a°~ N =F° ds ;~ ~~ ~ 9 , , s ~ ' ~O ~ ' R ~. d - , ~ . k ~ i o o ~ 3 C -1 ~ O~ N `c 9 u _ _ ` • r - N m W m m 7 1: OC~ O~ m ~<9 n S o0;~40~ w a _ ern-r~x;C•~ i3 v"'rs +x•o ~ ~ o ~ L ,a, ~, ~ ~ o =i ~ P ~' a - --- I ;j me ~ ~ ~ a ~ ' . , o I ~ ~ o „ f ' i N -+ -- i ----^~ --- ~ - - ~ >- ~ ~-° -- ~ Q i o o m m a a v n ° R ` ~~ t~~ 0 ~vs~ ~ b' i I ww~~ ~. ] n ~~ 1 ~ N _ NI c ~ p 3 W~' i ~1 ~ .aC K , q ~~ 3 1 n , i n m ,C 7 R ,J 9 Ox N~ZCwq i ' 1 C N P ' ~ n ~ T p ~ P m _ 1m .i 3 aC ? ~_~~~ _ m t J 3 9 ~ _ S WV ~ a n ~_ = N ~ 3 ~m m O; Y p r~ v C, O °°° ~ i3 ~ ~ rrr ie m~ ~ i ~p '' N ~~ W~ v b~ J. ~ S i . m J n N ~ x m ' ~ i I a y ~ 'i O ~ J N ~ i n~~ H a D ~C aY vb 289 jt N ro ~ .- a o a v a o L ~~ e ~ ' ~ pr [R i n z o a 3S; C rt N O • I s S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~~' ' C ~ ~ 111 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ p N i i ~ y 9 p= ~~ _ ^ -~ o ~°. , p~~ 1 °~~ ~ m m a @ ~ ~ ~ o7; 'S g oortof a '~ 0^': alavc 0 0 0 0 0 ~~~r II ~ e~ S y:. n 1 ~ ` ~F j ~ , ~ a > ~, o N w '~ ~~# x ' ~ m ~ ~ m a ~ ^~ q a ~~ ~o °a ; I s ~~ ao ao ~~ i ° ~ ~~v ~" ~~ ~" ~ ~' » ~ to ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~_ N .'as _, ~N 'm , o N .~~ '; a la to I 2 ~ y R Iti 1 1 ~ . . ~ Y a b~ e~ /Q y~p5~ A~ GRANTEE PERFDRNgNCE REPORT No. 7 a. gzsessment of Use of Community Developcent Black Grant Funds in Relationship to City and National Community Development 06}actives The 1906-87 Community Development Block Grant Program committed the C1 ty of Rancho Cucamonga to tiro new public corks projects and tiro ongoing pregrams. In order to support these projects and programs, the majority of funds received were budgeted to them. Nor[h Town Street Improvements - Turner Avenue east side North Town is a CDBG target area because over half of its households are low and moderate income. By repairing and upgrading public improvements in the area, and offering law interest loans and grants, the City hopes to encourage private investment in the area and ensure all residents a sofa and pleasant living environment. Thfs pro}act is a new one for 1906-87. tt involves the reconstruction of the east side of Turner Avenue north of the railroad tracks to add curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, and construction of a storm drain (part of a larger storm drain project needed t¢ permit construction of the planned North Town Park). Because the storm drain was added to the original pro}act, design took longer. However, the contract was awarded in June, 1987, and compl etfan is expected this year. Feron Boulevard Street Improvements Funds were set aside in 1986-87 to reconstruct the south side of Feron Boulevard in front of the proposed North Town Park site. The pro}act was delayed when it was df scovered that major drainage improvements will have to be made prior to park development. However, camel efion is expected in 1987, Housing Rehab111tatton In 1982.83 the Lity established an on9oinq, multi-year Housing ReMDilitation Loan program and a Senior Citizen/Disabled Persons Repair Grant Program. the Nausinq Rehabil nation Loans Drognm offers below market interest rate loans (with interest written down by the City) to low and moderate 7ncame homeowners fora mazimum term of fifteen (15J years. The Senior Citizen/Disabled Persons Repair Crant Program offers a non-repayable grant of uD to L1,500 to individuals or families that meet e1191bi1 sty and income requirements. ine rehabilitation loan program performance was off somewhat in 1986-87. The City has, through its program subcontractor (COUniy of San Bernardino Office of Community Development) processed a number of applications, and four home rehabilitation loans were funded. There were 37 emergency repair grants in addition. City staff will work with County staff t0 ¢nsure that performance continues to increase next year. ~ 9i Se of or Shared Housin The Inland Mediation Board, which operates fair housing servf ces and landlord/tenant counseling services far the City, has ettablished anew program of assisting senior citizens who want to continue to live independently but cannot live alone to find roommates among other active seniors. The Lity reprogrammed 55,000 in contingency funds to contribute to the start of this program. The program was operational in the summr of 1965, and all funds were spent. Twenty-two (22) seniors were counseled and one roommate match was made. 88% of these were lower income. This program meets the City's goal of providing a decent home in a suitable living environment for all residents. Administrative Coss Ic 1986-87 the City budgeted approxiaately :7,7 Der<ent of its entiflerant award for vari cus allowable administrative costs, including Fair Housing Services. Again this year, administrative costs were held below budget. Handicap 61mns The City of Hanch Cucamonga has several oltler shoDDi ng centers which do not have signs itlentifying handicap parkirty spaces and citing the municipal code sections which reserve them for the vehicles of disabled customers. As a result, enforcement is difficult. the City set aside funds to provide the necessary si 9ns, but questloni about liability (rave delayed the program. City Council is expected to reprogram the funds in the near future. No. 7 D. The City has not charged iLS program ob]e<ti vez for 1986-07 and would not change them as a result of Sts eaDertences, The ob]ectives for the 1986-87 program (as contained in the Final 9GtemetlL Of Caamunity Ob]e<tives) were: i. To eliminate and prevent slums and blight and cendi bons detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare wh11e Dresarvi ng the housing stock for people of law and moderate Income. II. To provide information and affirmative support far the Fatr Housing laws of the State and federal movernmonts. in zunnnrt of tha ,,,,.t of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home iri a suitable living environment. fII. To provide neighborhood parks and recreation facilities in law and moderate income neighborhoods in order to support rehaDil fiat ion of those areas and in order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities w711 improve the living environment in the surrounding low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. 2 41- !Y. To eliminate hazartls to the Dublic health and safety and Drovide street fmprovements in areas targeted for housing rehabllSLatian assistance. Priority in these improvements is befog given to areas whose residents are predominantly lw and moderate Income and to repairs which will correct health and safety hazards, thus improving the living envi ranment. No. 7 c. No conments were received from the Dublic on any part of the [l1BG program during the past year. 2 93 ntNPM4xm~nc~Rport ul el{NI.INrIIfIII1M wu a a N fl r N fs..+ n l MMW M FwWa Fria I a110 a BIR O nl doe N0. MOaaatll6p Ipatgll "~' l.Ilwf... F.lf[wiw City pf Rancho Lucaewnaa 8-86-MC-06-0556 fmm7-1-e6 r 6-30-87 M! E~INr M MwN w aw.rr Casa Funpl RapwNMf d q 1. uM.pNgM C4Ma FNIM tl 610 N RMwI MIOOnIM PMea a 714.6 z AONIINeI Cdn fuw e1ONY10 a ¢nlnllnlwn alrn { 409.0 pluor4ai nM M e. e1FPw. fmm umM wlw.uNOf 9MMmMl { ..p_ gpa')be21IM 1001 c uw! oulr.m.M uMN eNaKn loe s _n_ _ a. ROpNn IMam RavM1M DuNlp NM pl0yvn YW, Evcapl WlMnlq FuM IMpM { -~ 9WFI AmpIM • MNlnllp fYM FOpIM IMnIM nMMYM GIIIIIp IM f10Q1YI1 YW /MIN (III fum F -0 PI III MMIInII MpOmM M IM Sbfw el fuM1 M lll, column n _N. 1 PNUm 0161MI fuM1 1 p .ow noomMll ww MM{ N.cN.r Ilmn or umf a..n { a TOMI coea Fdlaf wNllw Id uf. Dunnp m.f wgmnp v.nna num or orl.. I Ina pN t 1,123.6 < coeo FuMf E.gnaM [WNM Ynu wgmnp PNlOa 382.2 (If Mom In A[Irn1Y 41ITmNY GCITI. CdWlln pl t 3 Um[pNgp BIIImI 01 COpG FuMf N EIM 01 TIIF RgNIiIp PNIOa IIM ]mmw IiM.I { _ 741.4 fM! OvN.F hlalMl ININII Y lw w YWIY bywf hIFM1 IN LoNI«m ewm ounrp m~. woonlnv PNlae 382.2 e .. rNN coca fuMf En01NMa nlPm uM 11eNV1 s 0, L... TMnllq w P,OpMm .Omm:.I,.nM GN. PI NK«n 10 acnnry Summfry IOMt. column 01 sz.a t c NN 4gMiW IM 9uq<[I l0 PropiMl B<mNl GKUINIM p~m N mmw nn1 NI t 720.4 1 Evgn011utl<aMNallllp lM m0 MMNII<In<Nm PNMnF 729 4 la mo.n m LPMMM e.mm wamnxl. PM Iv, rowmn N . . ~_'_' "a PNCMI BM<Iq m Lu« <M MOON.1< in[0^~ WrMn. I i nl IIIM )Ff <pN[Ml of llm Nl ~~ 9, Propnm YwNI COYNM In Gnlliclliq PY 86-7 PY_ PY_ Ial l01IM00 B<min l01 MuIOY.n GnaIGIIN< I<NIIPIN<onlY it <MIN<IIIM gn001¢NO< One Y<FO 10 1 Cumul<LO NO1 E.gnOnum 9uallCl to Plepnm INMIII GI<ublan f 0 aumYllllYl FAgMllurll BMIIINIIp Lo. In0 M00NM IKMM Mall t _ e MMt CumuMlly< BlMllt 10 L0. w MpaNNa IMdm fNMn< (llm 140 <f . gICMI011im ION Pnr1MI EOIIIMf 00MMI xuwra i I1M1 N CM fM e]Oe11B tl10] ~ 9v Grantee Parlormance Report u>, aN.am Nl H W Nw LRNIFRNI Bmnmlil WorRNNRI w ~ .N ~ mu~ry MNlopmenl Bla[X Glanl Royam ONB No ilpaD])) IFip IMIAEI City Gf RanchD Cucamonga B-86-ML-06-0556 r"" 7/1/66 F° 6/30/87 PM I: DIrN _ERpxbilwH la IM ~cyulm6bn, CmnsmNtbn w pNU blNtmtbn al Pm IM br IIa1lRllml Niner '- A°IMIr WRR IYNR. Y~w ~ NumON ~, "m ~ N~ w i~ Ylr Y ~ - F Nat applicable - 1001 of renab Dro I I pram Nas i i loN/mod benefit I i i ..- _ rN n gme l4PrMNN YeFI 11: 1,UVU LIIPMYNVNR Vemp NII'/ IN iYll NIY VFN°IM° W wYMN 11° °IN YIYIMI M4 YMNMYYUIN. W 6MeEiIMRtlen of PlopMy Iw MpuYna _ Mli^ry MM°IM1 WM °Ynn •ww ~Y Iti uw NumDx ~ xu nRN~ .rw wwnR,w WmF MirvWxn MYMM w~ wN NA ww iY ~ ~° ~ ^ . r .. ~ II Not applicable ,1008 of rehab prG1 II 1 I ram Nas loN/mod( i ° benefit .. .. .__ . •- _ - I T Wn MIYM FM O ~.~ rNMN O`~w l Pm III'. TYIm ERgndimru TNIR 6mppolnp PRrNd faR l1q OIMr AtlMllp OwlMyll , Ar 101r1 111a arRtlll Pot IV: Tobl LewlRbd emnNit Fram PMR 4 D RRd HI MWaMR.MpMI to CFR Ran 6m B NB (6101 ~qS z9c ~ O ~ ~ O ~ s~ ~ HOUR ~ O i ' s u ~ .-_ 3. . te. - E _ ~ i a .n .. u°~i . o E ¢ ~ ~ . i u ~ O ~~ F ~ m N _ o Z F ~~N~ ~ O~ v O d Vam ~ . m _~ O~so y 0 IM1w~tw Q F W ~ "i in N IoF~a m ' ~ ~ A.O j O -~wy s u L S~ ~ _:u~ W ~ _ ~ Q ~- F I E :FB o __¢_ - ~ # ¢ ~ m _ a w a g_ic Y5U ~~, ~t r ~e ¢ r v~u I ~ ~ '` ~ m ~9~ ~. ~° o m~, e =_ F¢ - F 'uJ _ Q O 4 ~ ~ u + W 6 -- U i ~ ~ ¢ Q a O _ 5 ~- 6 ~ F l - __ 2 a p n V e A a, ~~ d v a ~~~P~~ ~mmm~m ~~ ¢~ A `s o @N c `u ~ `e n3n Z a ~ 20 r ~Em 4 «AV30 ~~1 oic m°v o~ `e ~' w n ~~a X98 _s A : ~- _ ~ <,<° _ °~; , e -~ m . ;, I ~. ° o ~,. _~.-- ,. .. _.. .., .. - - ___ ._- R o0 ^ c: d - ~ o s .____....___ hp O ~ ~? ~ _ _~ O Q ; t SO P __ S :1 Z~ TZ _ ° iil m = _0 < .. Y I S t=%v S S .p J O I d, ' o ic_° '._ i°i, £ _ U 1' i ; J _ W w Y ~ a I$:. ~ i ' u ~F ' _" 'E aoa ~ -o 0 :o iz c -e sc - :~z ~ <u m i~ t ~ .c `'` o +a ^., a' " i° w_... .... ... _ .. ____._.._.--.____. _._. cl sl - F O 3 z < I ___ =aa ___~~_ o z _' U ~ a,. Yi > f ~ 22 - -~ i0¢i" ~i .<j ° _ Qw if~ ; ;i w0 P P , A~. .. _.. __. .. JCQ 3 '~ : 0 ' 1 I~ ~ 6 w > W SO F ..... __ '. a F= Q ~ . .. ._ _ n p u ~ i I o Vi`a`- 3 ~ pp 3 Y I ~i R ~ f I 2 99 RESOLUTION N0. ~ / - /J~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLDCK GRANT 1986-87 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT, AHD AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME AND DIRECTING THAT THE REPORT BE SUBMITTED TO THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. NHEREAS, in 1986-87 the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California conducted a Camiunity Development Block Grant Program; and NHEREAS, the 1986-87 Cosnunity Development Block Grant Program has been discharged according to Federal requirements and meets both City and Federal program ob,~ectives; and NHEREAS, the preparation of a Grantee Performance Report evaluating the programs Ts required by Federal regulations; and MHEREAS, the Grantee Performance Report is required to be approved by the City council prior to submittal to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; NON, THEREFORE, BE tT RESOLVED, that the report is hereby accepted and the Mayor is authorized to sign and submit the 1986-87 Grantee Performance Report to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. \~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner GiGMp 2~ } y 4:. ~i ~.~ FI'' A Ijz is.; I SUBJECT: ENVIRONiENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMi11NITY PLAN - - - reques o amen e c or a ommun y an ex to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 3,000 square foot lots from 75 feet to 60 feet, to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 4,000 square foot lots from 80 feet to 70 feet, and to require a minimum 10 foot front yard setback for the living area on 3,000 and 4,000 square foot lots. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that e y ouncll approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment 87-01. I[. BACKGROUND: Over the past year, the City has expressed concern over a proliferation of garage doors along the streets creating an undesirable streetscene. The William Ivnn Cmm~anv hoe re~n„~non to this concern Dy proposing an amendment to the VTctorla Community Plan that will provide for the development of wider, shallower iots. Also, the amendment would establish a minimum front yard setback for the living area, which 1s presently undefined. III. ANALYSIS: A. Reduced Lot Depth: By allowing reduced lot depths, the amen name-f~i~Tde an additional 7 to 10 feet in lot width for both the 3,000 and 4,000 square foot lots (50 to 57 feet in width versus 40 to 50 feet in width). The Planning Commission felt that the amendment would help provide a better balance between the amount of garage door and living area visible from the street. The dominance of the garage door would then be lessened. B. Eront Yard Setback: Mhile no specific front yard setback for e v ng area ex sts, the Planning Commission stated that the establishment of a 10 foot front yard setback would further mitigate the proliferation of garage doors. A 'iving area setback of 10 feet and a garage setback 20 feet would create greater architectural interest along the streetscape. The 30/ CITY COUNCIL STAfP REPORT YICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN IWENOMENT 87-01 September 16, 1987 Page 2 Pianntng Cowaission stated, however, that the 10 foot setback would only be appropriate if the setback area was landscaped, exclusive of walkways or structures, and if the second story was setback further than 10 feet. The Planning Commission did not establish a minimum setback for the second story and felt that this should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis during the design review of each tract. Re fully su tted, r City P1 ner BB: 91: to Attachments: Planning Comm1551on Staff Report of July 22, 1987 Planning Caawlssion Minutes of July 22, 1987 City Council Ordinance Amending the Victoria Coamunity Plan 302 rr~rv nc o n wrrvn rr rr n a.rnwrr STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1987 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner L.,......v~` 7 c~ `' ~~i ;~ ~-; 6 d< - s 19.` ~ SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN antnumenl ar-ui - nl.LLian Llun ~unruir - a request to amen e c or a wmwn y an ex to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 3,000 square foot lots from 75 feet to 60 feet, to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 4,000 square foot tots from BO feet to 70 feet, and to require a minimum ten (10) foot front yard setback for the living area on 3,000 and 4,000 square foot lots. ABSTRACT: Over the past year, the City has expressed a great deal o- ct on<ern over the developalent of small lot subdivisions. In particular, the City has been concerned about the streetscape created by the use of center plot units on narrow lots resulting 1n a proliferation of garage doors along the public streets. The William Ivnn r.mm~anv it nrn~nei nn th/< earn M,an1 to adAraee thn concerns raised by the City and to create greater variation in the streetscape. I[. ANALYSIS: A. Reduced Lot Depths: The applicant is proposing to reduce the requ~e m~inTmum'Tot depths on 3,000 and 4,000 square foot lots by fifteen (15) and ten (10) feet, respectively. This will result in a minimum lot depth of 60 feet for 3,000 square foot lots and 70 feet for 4,000 square foot lots. The trade-off for the reduced lot depths is the increased lot width that allows greater exposure of the living area to Lhe street. Far example, a 3,000 square foot l08 providing the current lot depth of 75 feet would have a minimum frontage of 40 feet. A typical center plot unit on this lot, with the five foot side yard setbacks, would have 20 feet of garage and 10 feet of living area visible from the street. If the lot depth was decreased to 60 feet, the frontage would be increased by 10 feet to 50 feet. A similar increase of 10 feet would be incorporated into the living area visible fro.. the street. This would provide a better balance between the garage and the living area along the streetscape. 303 ITEM K PLANNING COIMISSI Ok AFF REPORT YCPA 87-01 - NILLIAM LYON COMPANY July 22, 1987 Page 2 B. Front Yard Setback for Li vin Area: Nithin the Victoria ammun y an, ere are no spec a setbacks for Lhe living area of the dwelling unit - the setbacks Indicated in the Caemunity Plan are specified far the garage only (see Exhibit "A"). These setbacks range from 5-8 feet to 18 feet or greater (see Exhibtt 'B"). In that no setback is specified for the living area of the unit, the Planning Commission has, through approval of tracts within Ylctorla, established a policy of allowing a ten foot setback for the living area of the unit. Nhile the ten foot setback minimizes the dominance of garage doors along the streetscape, the Planning Coamission stated that the ten foot setback should be landscaped and that any walkway or structure should be located outside of the ten foot setback. In addition, the Commission felt that the second story of the unit should be setback further than ten feet. Special attention should be paid to the setback of the second story during the Design Review process. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the nv ronmen a e s and detenalned that the recpiested modifications to lot depths and front yard setbacks will not have a significant impact on the environment. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. rrr rgrTC cnP cr unrure. I. .~.. t^ -id-- -- t;,is ~cyucit, .:yy~~.ui u e ann ng ~omm~ssion must find that this Amendment is consistent with Victoria Planned Conmwnlty and the General Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a y eport newspaper. 4. RECOIMENDATION: Staff recomaends that the Planning Commission cons er a material and input regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with the Facts far Findings, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. Resp fully submitted, -~ ~~ B ul r City P1 nner BB:SM:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Existing Lot Depth Requirements Exhibit "B" - Existing Front Yard Setbacks Exhibit "C" - Proposed Standards Resolution of Approval 3 oy stby.d. SF ..:y uai.,i1. ,... .~. A4rm... casyv aof ~~ widjnjylow CITY OF RAi~'CHO CL'CA~~IC+~\'C~ 3~ ~~ ~~lFe fror Irc~u - i?A~ ~! r~/ Trtt~~ -~la~~~°rn~ --~- =~T ~ ntarM.w co..~yn eo% e f s...iae.pef..y Gr 3,G~ ~~ ~ z~9PO toru~- CI'TY OI' RAI~'CI-i0 CL'CANIOI\'C~ ~, ~~,~,~'.d~- ~~ PLAM11tiC D[VLSK)lY 3 D(~ E`CHIIpT~ " ~ ~,... F: ~A.. Aiar4.n.ce~yn eo%~/....di..Pg.yld. CITY OP RAI\•CHO CL'CA1~10,~•G~ ft.F-tVM1L~iG DtVLS'ION 30~ ,;aa~ ~A' ~'v~F ~ fl'L~i~ ~~fi~i mom: €a'®ic~- ~- EKHIOIT~ ' 3 e,•, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ... U a W a a U a ~~ _ ~ 0 CITY OI' RA1~'CHO CL'Cr~-~vIC1\'GA PUN~II\C DNL510N 3 o g ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~1~~ ~a~ y ~1 1 ~; r~, ~{ ~~~~ e ~i~r E`CHI[Pi'~ ~ c ^ai ~: 3000 S.F. LOT LINE CENTER PLOT uNe CITY OF RA1~'CHO CL'CA~~IO~\'GA PLANNI1.(, p(tr~~ 309 ZERO-LOT-LINE •I O MIN. LANDeGPED AREA RCS I~ /CtA 87-x/ TTI'LE~ ,~ ~5~~ 1 b w LINE y,~ .shy' CENTER LOT UNE •, o wN. utoscwreo ~ne~ y~ raR I A~'MiN. _ As ~'/ir~v ~' PLAlWi (~ pRI~Tp(v EYHIIIR~--['?`SGLE• 3l0 RESOLUTION N0. 87-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOIMENDIN6 APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87-01 TO MODIFY THE COMMINITY PLAN TE%T TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LOT DEPTN ON 3,000 SQUARE F00T LOTS FROM 75 FEET TO 60 FEET, TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LOT DEPTH ON 4,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS FROM 80 FEET TO 70 FEET, AND TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM TEN (10i FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE LIYIN6 AREA ON 3,000 AND 4,000 SQUARE F00T LOTS WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1987, the Planning Cosaslssion held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Governswmt Code; and SECTION 1: The Rancho Cuca~onga Planning Coanlsslon hereby hakes the following-fin~tfngs; 1. That the IYaenAaent will provide for developaw!nt of a caaprehenslvely planned urban caasamlty within the District that is superior to developax3nt otherxlse allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the AwendNent will provide for developsM•nt within the Otstrlct 1n a manner conslstenL with the General Plan and with related develop~ent and growth xenageaa!nc poi ales of the Gt ty; and 3. That the Mendeent w111 provide for the construction, iagroveaent, or extension of transportation fac111t1es, public utlliLies, and public services reQulred by developaent with the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucaaunga Punning Cowaisslon has found that this~pro ec w not create a significant adverse 1~pact on the envlronisent and recoaaaends issuance o/ a Negative Declaration on July 22, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Cal/forMa GovernNent Cade, that the Planning Coawlsslon of the City of Raneho Cuesagnga hereby recaasends approval of Victoria Punned Caaswfnlty Awendaient 87-01. 2. The Planning Coswisston hereby reeasgends that the City Council approve and adopt Victoria Planned Coss«rMty AaxendaMnt 87-01 to awdify the Coawunlty Plan as follows; 31 ~.. PLANNING COMMISSIO. ESOLUTION N0. VCPA 87-01 - THE NILLIAM LYON COMPANY July 22, 1987 Page 2 a) The ninlaaw required lot depth on 3,000 square foot lots shall be 60 feet. 6) The etniwr• required lot depth on 4,000 square foot lots shall be 70 feet. c) The ~1nlakw front yard setback for the first story living area of the dwelling unit shall be ten (10) Peet. My second story shall be setback further than ten (10) feet subject to approval during Design Review of the tract. The setback area shall be landscaped and 1s exeiuslve of walkways or structures. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY Of JULY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA al. rry T.~Ic-Ai01; C a rwan,~/~ ATTEST:i~~~ u er ~ r~- I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coaaalsslon of the Ctty of Rancho Cucaaanga, do Dereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted Dy the Planning Cash sslon of the City of Rancho CucaaxMga, at a regular neeting of the Planning Co~isston Acid on the 22nd day of Juty, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: CdMISSI0MER5: CHITIEA, EHERICK, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL NOES: COMIISSIg1ER5: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 3 13 Commissioner Chitiea questioned if a trail location on the east side of the parcel had been settled. Mr. Oilorio responded that he understood the recommendation of the Equestrian Trails Committee and it mdy require removal and the transplanting of the olive trees that are there now in order to get the rest of the tract map to work. To try to work the trail in and not hurt the olive trees really means the trail has to move 40 feet inside the property line which is awkward, There may be a desire to actually the equestrian onto the flood control property. They are concurring with the staff recommendation that the equestrian trail goes on their side of the property line. As the development for the big new son Sevine Basin moves along, the property between the two loop roads is declared surplus, then it would benefit everyone to look at that space as being usuable open space park land and obviously the equestrian trail wfll go through there. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Emerick moved to approve the resolution, Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion with the clarification of the average lot size of 15,000 feet. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ••*+*• v --carried „a LL alw L,V„ LV.RM, - h fCquc~L W a1NC nu 411C ~1l:Wrla 1,Ummaal Ly an x o re uce the minimum required lot depth on 3,000 square foot lots from 75 feet to 60 feet, to reduce the minimum required lot depth on 4,000 square foot lots from 00 feet to 70 feet, and to require a minimum ten (10) foot front yard setback for the living area on 3,000 and 4,000 square foot lots. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing Mr. Stephen Ford, William Lyon Company representative, stated concurrence with the staff report. Chairman McNiel expressed his gratitude of the William Lyon Company to responding to the City's request and feels the community is much better for it. Commissioner Chitiea supported Chairman McNiel's comments. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes - 15 - July 22, 1987 31y Commissioner Chi ti ea moved to approve the resolution, Commissioner Emerick seconded the motion. Motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL NOES: COMt4ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMM[SS IONERS: TOLSTOY + : x ~ --carried L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-19 - SNARING - e eve opmen o a as er an urc act t y consts ng of a worship center, office building, classroom buiiding, and multi-purpose building and a request to use the facility as a daycare center on a 3.87 acre parcel of land in the Low Density Residential District (2 - 4 dwelling units per acre 1, located at the southwest corner of Jasper Street and Lomita Drive - APN 202-026-13. Associated with this project is Tre Removal Permit 87-34. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Murphy also submitted a letter from Mr. Lee H. Pearce, 7216 Topaz, Alta Loma, stating his support of the church facility. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Mr. Tom Matlock, architect, stated concurrence with the staff report. He indicated the preschool is not intended to be developed in Phase I. Mr. Jack Ottens felt that Topaz should be redesigned where Jasper school Mr. Carl Lewis, moderator, 856 Burkeley, Ontario, addressed the issue of undergrounding from mid Sierra Vista. There is no access and this would present a substantial financial burden on the congregation since there are no means to pass the costs along. He questioned the landscaping issue stating they celt they shouldn't landscape property not belonging to them. Ms. Lori Johnson, 2436 North Euclid, Suite A, Upland requested the Commission consider wafving the undergrounding costs for this project since the 66 KV lines are not removed an Edison is not sure they can take lines under the channel. The cost is f100,000 to run one line underground and yet keep the existing poles. She also stated that General Telephone trunk lines on Foothill go nowhere. Mr. Bill Scheuell, 7251 Sierra Ytsta, Alta Loma, suggested making the entrance off Jasper Street a cul-de-sac. Mr. Lloyd Michael, 5966 Sacramento, stated for the church to underground would be a considerable hardship on this piece of property. Planning Commission Minutes - I6 - July 22, 1987 3IS ORDINANCE N0. 32~- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 87-01, TO MOO [FY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH ON 3,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS FROM 75 FEET TO 60 FEET, TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTN ON 4,000 SQUARE F00T LOTS FROM 80 FEET TO 70 FEET, AND TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM TEN (10) FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE LIYING AREA ON 3,000 AND 4,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner by law, recommends the Community Plan text amendment hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing to the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recoamrendatton. B. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. C. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District Tn a manner consistent with thr General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. D. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, pu611c utilities, and public services required by development within the District. SECTION 2; The Comnuni ty Plan text of the Victoria Planned Community is hereby amid-to read as follows: A. The minimum required lot depth an 3,000 square foot lots shall be 60 feet. B. The minimum required lot depth on 4,000 square foot lots shall be 70 feet. C. The minimum front yard setback for the first story living area of the dwelling unit shall be ten ('0) feet. Any second story shall be setback further than ten (10) feet subject to approval during Design Review of the tract. The setback area shall 6e landscaped and is exclusive of walkways or structures. ~/(p nrmv nc. o ~ w,nvn n..n . ,.nvn . STAFF REPORT ~ `~^ma,~' S~~I Date: September 16, 1987 ~~~~ VIII r To: City Council and City Manager = -19__ from: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Richard Cota, Associate Civil Enginee~w( Subject: Approval of Environmental Assessment and Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the Proposed Milliken Avenue Grade Separation RECDMENDATIDN: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Milliken Avenue Grade Separation at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Crossing north of Sixth Street. BACKGRDUND/ANALYSIS- This report presents an Environmental Assessment for the proposed MTlliken Avenue Grade Separation as prepared by DeLeuw, Cather and Company, Engineers and Planners in their "Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Studies for Railroad Grade Separation on Milliken Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California", dated August 1987. This report was presented to the City fannril at ife mnnrin~ n e„~,__• 1o tool ~t ..hi_h - u~c wuu~il directed staff to proceed with any underpass ~design~+for the grade separation. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached documents have been prepared to permit construction of the above mentioned improvements. These improvements consist of the installation of a bridge undercrossing for vehicular and pedestrian traffic as well as the construction of such items as landscaped medians, asphalt concrete pavement, Portland cement concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lights. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore, recommend that these proposed improvements be classified as a Negative DeCldrd Ll(ln, Res submitted, R :pa, At s ~ ~7 CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: _ Secretary for Resources FROMt City of Rancho .Cucamonga 1416 Ninsh Sveet, Room 1311 Engineering Division Sacramento, California 938(4 p, o. Box e07 or 1 County Clerk Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 County of San Bernardino SLIf13ECT: Filing of Notice of Ihtermination in compliance with Section 11108 or 21132 of the Public Resources Code. Milliken Avenue Grade Separation Project Title ' ' 4) 989-1862 State Clearinghouse Number Contact erson elephone Number (It submitted to Clearinghoux), proposed northerly extension of Milliken Avenue and its crossing at the Atchison, of a bridge undercrossing for vehicular and pedestrian traffic and of such items as landscaped medians, asphalt concrete pavement, ton ent concrete curbs, gutters> sidewalks and street lights. This is to advise that the Ci jy of)~~,~,y~gnga_ - _ (Lea Agency or Responsible Agency has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: t. The project _ will, ~ will not, have a significant effect an [Ae environment. .. i+n cnvtronmentai impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ~ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: -~ Citv Hall - 9320 Base Line Road. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173D 3. Mitigation measures ~ were, % were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations yns, ~ was not, adopted for this project. Hate: Snntamhnr 1(y, ]g87 Si t Russe aguire City Engineer 1'ttle Appendix F 31F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION This environmental study section is yrepered in conjunction with the Milliken Avenue Preliminary Engineering Report deed 1987 for the City of Rancbo Cucamonga. The render ie referred to [het report for a detailed Project Description and other relevant extione. Only those environmental eoncerna not eddreeaed in the Preliminary Engineering Report will be presented in this eeotian. ALTERNATIVE TO THE PROPOSED PROJHCT Two nlternntivea to the proposed grade eeperntion exist The fire[ is no project The no-build elternntive would menu Lhe continuation of all ezieting problems. Ae increased industrial development in the ores of the project develoye, congestion and aceeas problems will oNy women. The second alternative ie to eonetruct nn at-grade eroeeing, Thin alternative, with the projected traffic for Milliken Avenue and its conflicts with the mein rail lines end switching movements on the spur tracks, would greatly increase potential accidents nt the crossing. Moreover, a grade croaaing can be only if euLhorized by Lhe Celifornin Public Utilities Cammiaeion, which hoe ebeolu Le .. r:..::~u..., c:___ " e eugineenng euu'f of the P.U.C. end Santa Fe Railway could be expected to strongly oppose a grade croeaing, it ie considered unlikely that the Commission would hand down n Decision approving a grade croaeing. PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed grade separation an Milliken Avenue nt the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway could take one of two forme. The first is nn underpass; the second is en overpaea. For purposes of the preliminary environmental study both were considered. (As per City Council direction provided at their August 19, 1987 meeting, the Engineering staff has been directed to proceed with an underpass design,) 32 3~0 raetecmination on the bns is of this preliminary environmental study, it is determined that the proposed anion will not have a significant eftect upon the environment for the following reasons: 1. Tne project would .:ct have a significant affect on existing air o[ wafer quality, noise levels, energy consumption, land use or be growth induc inq. 2. The project would not affect any rate or endangered plants or animals, oz significantly affect any other plant or wildlife species. 3. The project would be located in a predominantly indust: ial area. Nearby residential areas would not be adversely affected. 4. ^. he pcojece would not involve the demnt+r+~.. ... r^1^^__[ica of tw structures. - 5. Nc social, cultural, recreational, educational or other public faciii ties mould Ce affected. 6. The aesthetics of the area would remain essentially unchanged. %. Nc ps: klands, wetlands, floodpiains, prime agricultural lands, historically or cultuca lly significant properties or sites would be affected. 33 321 3-p3-13 1981-1 ENVIROW4ENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST After making the necessary preliminary studies, answer the fallowing questions: If yes, 15 it signifi- Y es or cant? No, No Yes, or PHYSICAL. Wi11 the oroocsal either directly or irdirectly: 1. Change Che topography or ground surface relief features? Y=_s No 2. Des: roy, cover, ar modify any unique geologic or phyzicai features? yp 3. Result in unstable earth surfaces or exposure of people or property to ged logic hazards? v0 _ 4. Result in or be affected by sail erosion or siltation (whether by water or windJ7 No _ 5. Result in the increased use of fuel ar energy fn large a:,ounts cr in a wasteful manner? yp 6. Result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? 7. Result in the substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _„ .P.Q 8. Violate any published Federal, State, ar local standards pertaining to solid waste pr litter control? ~ NC _ 9. Modify the channel aP a rf ver or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or take? Np 10. Encroach upon a~floodplain er result in ar be affected by floodwaters or tidal waves? 11. Adversely affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water, or public water suDPly? NO _ 12. Result in Che use of water in large amounts or in a wasteful manner? NO _ 17. Affect wetlands or riparian vegetation? NO 'See following section: Of scussion of Envirdnmenial Evaluat lon and Mitigation Heasures. 34 3 ~~- 3-03-I4 1981-I If yes, is it signifi- Yes or cant? No, No Yes, br PHYSICAL. Ni11 the brobasal etcher di rectl or ind irecil cont.) 14. Violate or be inconsistent with Federal, State, or local waver quality s:ardard5? No _ 15. Result in changes in air mbvemen t, moisture, or tem- perature, or any tlfmdt is conditions? NO 16. . Result in an increase in a1r pollutant emissf ons, adverse effects an or deterioration of ambient air quality? No _ 17. Result in the cre atibn bf objectionable odors? NO 18. Violate or be incbnzi scent with Federal, State, or local air standards mr conirml plans? xo _ 19. Result in an increase fn noise levels or vibration for adjoining areas? YES Mo 2O. Ytolate or be inconsistent with Federal design noise levels or S:aie or local noise si andards? NO 21. Produce new light, glare, or shadows? YES NO BIOLOGICAL N111 the oroocs ai result !n (eithrr di rrC. i. nr ;nd;rnr!tvl• 22. Change in the diversify of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora, and aquatic plants)? NO 27. Reduction of the numhers of or encroachment upon the critical habitat of any unique, rare or endangered species or plants? s4 24. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or result in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? NO 25. 0.educiion in acreage of any agricultural crop or cbmmercial timber stand? ~4 26. Removal or deterioration of rxiscing fish or wildlife habitat? MO 'See followf ng section: Biseussion bf Environmental Evaluatio n and Miti Batton Measures. 35 3~3 3-03-16 1981-1 If yes, is it signifi- Yes or cant? Nv, No Yes, ar B IOLOG iCAL. Nill the orvvasal resuit in (either direc•ly or lndi rec'lY): (cont.) 27. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and sheilfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? NO 29. Reduction of the mimhers of or encroachment upon the crf iical habitat of any unique, rare or endangered species of an imalz? NO 29. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a harrier to the migration ar movement of animals? po SOCIAL_ANO ECONOMIC. Nf it the orooosal direc•ly or tndirec`l y• 30. Cause disruption of orderly planned development? NO _ 3i. Be inconsis;en: with any eiemer.ts of adcpted cartmunity plans, policies, or goals, the Governor's Urban Strategy ar the President's National UrC m Policy (if NEPA pro]ect )? vn 32. Affect the lacat!on, distribution, densely, or growth rate of the human population of an area? No _ 33. Affec: life-styles, ar neighborhood characteror stability? No 34. Affect minority or other specific interest groups? No _ 35. Divide or disrupt an established community? NO _ 36. Affect existing housing, require the displacement of people or ereato a demand for additional housing? No _ 37. Affec: employment, industry ar commerce, or require the di splacemenl of husfnes ses or farms? No 38. Affect property values or the local tax Dase? p~ p0 'See followfn9 section: Discussion of Envi rornuental Eva tuatlon and Ni tigat ton Measures. 36 gay 3-03-16 1981-1 If yes, i. it si gnif Yes or cant? No No ~ Yes, ar SOUAL ANO E[Of10MIC. Vi I1 the orooosal direcil or ind irectl cont. 39. Affect any community facilities (inQ ud ing medical, educational, scientific, recreational, or religious inSLiCuL10n2, Ce refildnldl S1 Ce2 Or SDCred Shrinei~? NO 40. Affect public utf lities, or police, fire, emergency ar other public services? ~ YES NO 41. Have substantial impact an existing transportation systems cr alter present patterns of et rculat ion or movement of people and/or goads? YES NO ' 42. Affect vehicular movements or generate additional traffic? YES NO 43. Affect or be affected by existing parking facilities or result in demand for new parking? NO _ 44. Involvt a substantial risk of an ez pl osion ar the release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident ar upset Conditionsi NO _ 45. Result fn alterations to xaterborne, rail or air traffic? Nn 46. Affect public health, expose people to potential health hazards, or create a real or potential health hazard? No _ 4i. Affec: any significant archaeological or historic site, zi ructure, object or building? NO _ 48. Affect natural landmarks or man-made resources? NO _ 49. Affect any scenic resources or result in the abstructi on of any seen is vista ar viex open Co the public, ar creation of an aesthetically offensive site open Cb public viex? ~ _ g0. Result in substantial impat is associated with construc- tion activities (e.g., noise, dust, temporary drainage, traffic detours and temporary access, etc.)? No 'See folloxing section: Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures. 37 3a,~ 3-03-17 1981-1 If yes, is 1t sfgnifi- Yes or cant? No, No Yes. or ~ MANDATORY FiNO?NGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. 51. Does the project have the potential to degrade the Qualfty of the environment, substantially reduce the .hahi tat of a fish or wi ldlf fe species, cause a fisn or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining Levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal conmunity, reduce the number ar reserict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important ez ampler of the major periods of Calffcrnia history or prehistory? NO _ 52. Oaes the project have the potential to aehf eve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-tern, environmental goals? (A chart-tens impact an the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) NO _ 53. Does the project have envirommental effects which are individually limited, but cumulatively ecnsiderabla? Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual praj ect are considerable when viewed in connection with the ef`eets of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and Lim eirects or praoaole tutor! Drojects. fi incluces the effects of other projects which interact with this project and, together, are cons.i derahle. NO _ 54. Ooes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or fndfrectly? xo •See follawi ng section: Discuss tan of Environmental Evaluation and Miti gatf on Measures. 38 3 2!c IIiVIRONtgNTAL EVAIDATION AND MITIGATION NEASURES 40.) The construction of a grade aeparaClca will provide improved emergency access throughout tha area is [he Milliken Avmue vieiaitp. 41.) The impacts will ba poaicivn. Improved access ce areas to ehe march in addition to the industrial areas will ba provided from the San Bernardino Freeway. 39 3~7 RESOLUTION N0. (~ / - S~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED MILIIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Milliken Avenue Grade Separation Improvements; and NHEREAS, said improvements require Environmental Assessment; and NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initiai StuQy has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Effie Enviromaental Assessment initial Study and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Milliken Avenue Grade Separation Improvement pro,~ect. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Detenninat o~suant to the California Environmental Quality Act. 3.2a nrmv nc o ~ wrncrn nr rn ~ unw.n STAFF REPORT ~~'`v , .,~~ r 0 z 7 LL DATE: September 16, 1987 V'!! {Vl 1977 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PARCEL MAP 5996 - DA~IO BOWDEN - The appeal of t e on itions o Approva requiring an in-lieu fee for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities far this project located on the south side of Wilson Rvenue, west of Haven Avenue - APN 201-181-59 RECDMENDATIaI [f, after receiving all public testimony and input, the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, then denial of the appeal would be appropriate. II. B11C1C6RDUND: The Planning Commission conditionally approved tentative Parcel Map 5996 on July 24, 1967. The applicant is now appealing Condition iiu. 2 ye, Lniniuy i.u uLiiiLy unueryruwiu iny. Tiie 5taif report and the letter of appeal are attached for your reference. Special Condition No. 2 requires that an in-lieu fee be paid as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilfti es located on the opposite (north) side of Wilson Avenue far the length of the frontage of the project which is consistent with current Planning Cammissf on policy Resolution No. 81-123 (copy attached). The location of the utilities in relation to the project is shown on Exhibit "A". The applicant did not raise this issue at the Planning Commission hearing; therefore, it is not known whether the Commission would have waived this requirement. iii. ANALYSIS: Factors to be considered in the evaluation of the appeal are as follows: 1, The applicant did cooperate with the City by withdrawing an earlier application for an eight lot subdivfsion on the property aa4 CCSR APPEAL OF PM 5996 SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE 2 in order to be in compliance with a neighborhood request for a rezoning of the general area to the current lower density. That project was submitted prior to the implementation of the current undergrounds ng policy. 2. The developments to the north and west of the project were approved prior to the current policy, therefore, were not assessed for undergrounding. 3. The Planning Commission Policy Resolution (Section 7) contains a listing of types of projects that are exempt from undergrounding requiranents, because of their minor nature. This particular project nearly meets the criteria for item g of Section 7 except for the fact that the vacant property to be east can wntribute to future undergrounding; therefore this project could not be automatically exempted. It 1s possible that the Commission might have determined that this project meets the intent of the exemption; however, because the applicant did not raise the issue at the hearing, it is not known what determination the Commission would have made. However, regardless of the above noted items, the requirement for the fee for this development is wnsistent with the current policy. Res pec~llmitted, ~ ~ RHM K: lw Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Utility locations Letter of Appeal Undergrounding Policy Resolution Planning Commission Staff Report 330 Nan eN 1 U V Q W O J W W Q 6 »'30~HW O 3 e V Z W K F N W K j ~LL I r Z ~ II u I ~I 4 I ~ ~ ~ W ~_ Zw f L N~ M~ W¢ r ~~~ ~3 ydd 03. 't JaHO a- Q W a 0 w w 0 Q= ~~ I h 2 m ~. u J Q p ~ 1- 2 ~ Q V v za z ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ W C ~ ~ u A y 4i Q ~ N ti <~ w t ,W F- O U z U O x zU d 0 c~ 33~ Hs~i,~b~~-r City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 July 31, 1987 7'~~""~ K SUBJECTS in lieu contribution fee for future undergroundinq of the existing overhead utilities on the north side of Wilson Av, City Clerk In January of 1984, I filed TPM N9996. This vas delayed by a decision to re-evaluate the zoning of the area, by the Planning Commission. A decision by the Commission, was agreed upon to re-zone the area involving TPM N5996. T was advrsed by Rick Gomez City Planner, and 8arrye Hanson Civil Engineer to withdraw the proposed TPM N5996. Upon their request I then withdrew my TPM. The City Council approved the amendments on June 19, 1985 Due to the fact that our engr neerinq pens would not comply to the new zoning requrrements, it was necessary to re-engineer for your new zoning. This new expense of re-engineering was a hardship on me, and I was unahle M cram ._ m.,a. ,ret.. _ .w_ - the map, Had the city not determrned~thatytheccircumstancesywarrantedete re-eval~atron, the ou ginal TPM N5996 would have been approved pn or to th_s resolution 186-771 being adopted. Furthermore the development north of Wilson (directly involved with this uncle r_groundinq of utilitiesl will no[ be assessed these feesfor their halt of undergroundinq. It is unlrkely and improbable that the under- oro~ndrnq will ever be completed, at leas[ not in the foreseeable future. 'his assessment of a ;20~, 000.00 undergroundinq fee theref ore'>.s c.mple tly c•sc r.minatory -garnst TPM N5996 Should this appeal not be granted I ~+=:'- be forced to seek legal celtef. Sincerely D. W. Bcwden cc D. W. Bowden 1441 N. Campus Av. Ontar i~o ~~Ca~ 91764) Q.C. V r-+w~~ 3 31. RESOLUTION N0. 87-96 A RESOLUFIQI OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE LN DERGROUN DING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTI01 N0. 86-77 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86-17 which was adopted on the 28th day of May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cut anonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living envirarment within the City; and NHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments, except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street*: a. SaiA lina< chall hn unAn~rmnunAon e• •~,e n..,,,. i.,.,..-.. .. . _..___ __ _.._ ,._...,_, xpr..... b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of Services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c, The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines on the a oslte side of the street from the ro'ect: The Developer s a pay a ee to t e ty or one- a t amount Per ection 6. 3, lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with ection a ve an e e g e or reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4. Pole lines containin 66KV or tar er electrical lines: Atl lines shall be un ergroun a or ln- leu ees pal In actor ante wl section 1, 2 or 3, above, except for 66 KV or larger electrical lines. 33 3 5. Limits of Resaonsibilfties: a. In-lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property being developed from property tine to property line (the center of adjacent streets for corner properties). b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend to: (1) the first existing pole off-site from the project boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project Doundary, except at a corner. 6. Fee Amount: The amount for fn-lieu fees shall equal the length (per ect on .a times the unit amount as established by the City Council based upon iM'ormation supplied by the utility canpantes and as updated periodically as deemed necessary. 7. Exem~ The following types of projects shall be exempt from this po xy: a. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area, parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc. b. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25X of the floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor's parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less. r. F%LPriOr unnra Aina nr ra nair rrf orieiinn Aupolnrnnnle urh reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. d. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUPS. e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility easenents with a heavy concentration of services to adjacent developments, and the utility lines are 500' er more from the right of way line of a Special Boulevard. g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single fanny residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' off site from both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is rwt likely to contribute to future undergrounding. * All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel rights-of-way, etc. 33y APPROVED AND ADDPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JIME 1987. PLANNING CO1I~ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMgIG4 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coatetsslon of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaieonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plam~ing Coiwisslon of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, at a regulariseettng of the Planning Cosatssion held on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COHMISSIONERS: ROES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSERT: CDMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN': COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL TOLSTOY NONE BLAKESLEY 33S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: duly 22, 1987 ' T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comm ssion FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Kroll, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: uvnucn - n auw,riaiun ur c.u acres yr ions loco v parcels in cne e~Low (2 dwelling units per acre) Residential Development District located on the south side of Nilson gvenue, east of Mayberry Avenue - APN 201-181-59 I. PRWECT qND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as sTiavn on Exhibi~f "8" B. Parcel Size Parcel 1 22,500 sq. ft. o.r~gl ? 21 mn , f. Parcel 3 21,000 sq. ft. Parcel 4 22,500 sq. ft. Total 87,000 sq. ft. Average 21,150 sq. ft. C. Existing Zoning: Very Low (2 D'U's/AC) Residential Development District D. Surroundin Land Use: Nor - x sting s ogle family homes South -Single family hares under construction East - Vacant and single Family home West - Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North -Very Low (2 DU/AC)-Rest ent a ve oilmen South -Low Medium (4-8 DU/AC) Residential Develonment East - Very Low (2 DU/AC) Residential Development West - Very Low (2 DU/AC) Residential Development 3 3 6 ITEM G PCSR TENT. PARCEL M4P 5996 JULY 22, 1987 PAGE 2 Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes approximately 8X in a southerly direction. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The purpose of this parcel map is to create four parcels for the future development of individual single family hares. The parcels as proposed do rat meet current Development Code standards for average size and depth; therefore a related variance (VA 87-08) is on tonight's agenda for the Commission's consideration. Approval of the Parcel Map is contingent upon approval of the variance. The site is located within the 12 acre area bounded by the site, Milson Avenue, Tract 10827, and Haven Avenue as shown on Exhibit "C". The area is predominately undeveloped with the exception of the Davis have located immediately to the east of the site. The area Ss designated as very low (2 du/ac) potentially yielding as many as 24 homes. A street master plan for the area was developed with the approval of Tract 10827 to the south (see Future Streets on Exhibit "C"). Only one street connection to Milson Avenue aligned with Cartilla Avenue to the north was aDProved, because of the close pro ximtty of Mayberry Avenue to Cartilla Avenue. The Davis residence temporarily takes access from Milson Avenue via an easement over the easterly portion of proposed Parcel 1 of this Parcel Map. The applicant is proposing to use the same temporary access easement for the proposed parcels. B. Issues: Staff requests that the Commission consider a redesign of the Parcel Map eliminating the southerly cul de sac on the proposed street (Cabrosa Place) and extending it southerly to' connect~to Northridge Place, which is the most northerly east/west street currently under construction wlthfn Tract 10827 immediately to the south. The redesign is shown on Exhibit "F". The reasons for the redesign are as follows: The connection to Northridge Place will provide two means of access to the 12 acre Master Plan Area. If only one access is available and becomes blocked, safety vehicl"a and homeowners have no alternate way to enter or leave the area. Also, it is City Policy to provide two means of access to all protects whenever possible. 337 PCSR TENT. PARCEL MVP 5996 Jl1LY 22, 1987 PAGE 3 2. It would eliminate the need for the tenporary access connection to Milson Avenue which is undersireable, because it creates an additional traffic conflict point on Nilson Avenue and an additional crossing of the Community Trail on the south side of Nilson Avenue. In the future, the driveway approach on Nilson Avenue will have to be renoved and replaced with standard street, parkway, and trail improvements, and the portion from Nilson Avenue to Cabrosa Place will have to be ranoved and regraded creating a disruption to the residence on Parcel 1. 3. The protect as proposed would not cor~fonn to Planning Commission Resolution No. 79-07 which require<_ a pavement width of 26 feet within a 40 foot right-of-way to reach the nearest City Maintained Street (See Exhibit "E" attaUed). 4. This connection will eliminate the need for the construction and future maintenance of a storm drain pipe through private property by allowing drainage to flow within a public street. to addition, Tt is rroted that the redesign reduces the average lot size deficiency, although a variance is still required. A comparison of the parcel areas (in square feet) is as follows: Parcel Proposed Modified Difference 1 22,500 22,500 0 7 P1 O(In 7t nm n 3 21,000 23,480 + 2,480 4 22,500 21,600 - 900 Total 87,000 88,580 + 1,580 Average 21,150 22,145 + 395 % of 22,500 * 96.7X 98.4% + 1.7% * Required average per Development Code. Two problems associated with the redesign are as follows: 1. The connection of Cabrosa Place to the south and eventually to Ntlsan Avenue will undoubted attact sane increased traffic from the south to wilson Avenue. However, the anount of traffic is considered minimal, because there is not a Large attraction to the north such as work or recreation centers, and it is a rather circuitous route due to the two 90° turns. 33g PCSR TEMT. PARCEL MAP 5996 JULY 22, 198) PAGE 4 2. The access easenent for the Oavis residence will have to be abandoned voluntarily by the owner or closed by the City. It would he undesireable to keep it open and also make the street connection Lo the south, because it would provide a direct access to Nilson Avenue. It is rroted that the access will be removed in the future even if Cabrosa ends in a cul de sac in order to maintain the single wnnection to Nilson Avenue opposite Cartilla Avenue. Conclusion: The Commission appears to have two options: 1. Approve the Parcel Map as proposed by the applicant with the temporary access to Nilson Avenue 2. Approve the Parcel Map sub,Sect to the requirement to make a connection to the south. The resolution for the proiect was prepared for the approval of Option 2. If Option 1 is approved, Special Condition 1 under Engineering Division shall be replaced with the following: 1. Temporary access to Nilson Avenue: a. A standard 30' wide commercial drive approach shall be constructed on Nilson Avenue b. The temporary access shall be designed and constructed to support public service vehicles. The pavement shall he a minimum of 26' wide. c. A 30' wide easement for public service vehicles shall be provided by separate lnstrunent. d. The temporary access to Nilson Avenue shall be removed and the effected trail and street improvements along Nilson Avenue constructed at the time in the future that an alternate access is provided. An agreement to this effect secured by a lien agreement against Parcel 1 shall be executed prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. ?~9 PCSR TENT. PARCEL M4P 5996 JULY 22, 1987 PAGE 5 III. ENVIRftYMENTAL REVIEN: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial to y. to con ucted afield investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPCi1DENCE: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent to surrounding prope~arners and placed in the DaSly ReDOrt newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. RECOMMEND4TION: It fs recommended that the Plannning Commission approve ~cTFap with a nadification to extend Cabrosa Place southerly to connect to Northridge Place. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, the adoption of the attached resolution and the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ ~ Barrye Hanson Senfar Civil Engineer RRH:BK:dlw Attachments: Vicinity MaD (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "8") Master Ylan (txhtatt "C") Conceptual Grading Plan (Exhibit "D") Resolution No. 79-07 (Exhibit "E") Modified Parcel Map (Exhibit "F") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval 3 yo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIQEERII~(} DIVISION N Pl'&N: ~BCEt_ MAp S99 6 T1TLE:1llj'~NI7Y MAp err. " ® " ~y/ -~ ~u WILSON ~t'AVENUE ,_. `~ :• ~- WIDEEASEEMENTY ACCESS FLAG PORTION OF PARCEL 1 J ~~ 14 E ~ pAV15 ~iq RESI PENCE I: i =. r--=: I I le .: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIdEERING DIVISION 1T'EM: PARCEL MAP 5991e TITLE: TENTATIVE MAP ,• ~~ ' E7CIIIBIT: Q 3 y' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ExGn~r4naa Divietox N ~; PARCEL MAP Sggls ~;~qE. e~p~cT MASTER PL _ ~~_ C ~ y3 - ......_ i ~ .. '~-r~=-~=~ z ~-'=r-'_ - ~. ~li ~ ~ 1 ~ _ ~ _ f ~ i ;Yt.. " ~ ~ ' V 3 :; ~» ~: _ '~ -. ~ I \ ~t' ~ ~'~a m ~Y l ~ W x IF -d iA ~" •~: ~. 1 i° s., '--__-_ `~~. Z N ~; ^.r li!~~ r ~. ~-_~ .~ - 2~ ~` a :r I ~ .~ -~. ~ ; ~ . 4 .~ Cf ~~ ~ 1~ 2 •a:~= - ii j 1 I ~ .~ \ e 'XnC7 ~ r •~~ ~ i.'2'1 Y' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIJEERING DMBION NOTE: x-SECTIONS SHOWN ON 2 OF ~ V N 1TEM: PAR ai nnsp 599b TITLE; CONCEP? SAL ..QSni~~ nil ~: EXF~1T:_ ~ 1 ec 2 3 vy ~r LILOI AG eVT E- 41 `mow=la ~L.-vT f= s~ccc~ow •-w N.T S. Y ~ ~E~ W 3s i' i J9 z ~ ~i ~ -^O f vT. ST/6 ~~/. ~'R/Atl 6~W~vn.ICr , e 40 ~• C G rfcnou a-D ~~~ No 6LAL! Ne ~~,~ u tT +Mk4 1 ho ~i. "~_ ~_ _ l... c. 1 i r+'~ ~ + ~ y'I ('~'4'~w~i+ "•T CT~ow o-o N CITY OF 1TEld: PARCEL MAP 5996 RANCHO CUCAMONGA T1TLE:`'aPiwei7 z s~ onDis ~' ENGII~EERIIJG DMBION ERHISIT: " nN 2 or 2 3 yS RESOLUTION N0. 79-07 A (tESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COl4fISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA ESTABLISHING SUBDIVISION ACCESS Il@ROVIIIENT POLICY. WHEREAS, the Planning Co®laslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to discourage the proltferatfon of private ualmproved streets; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish flan policy guideline co inform property owners of the City goals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED AND ESTAHLISBED, that as a condition of approval of any Parcel Map, Portal Map Walvar, Trac[ ILp os Lat Line Ad~uatment sn applicant shall have aecesa to a fully dedicated and maintained Ci[y st rest. Where dedications and improvements do not axis C, the applicant shall obtain a minimum of forty (40) feet of dad icatlon and improve with ewenty-six (26) feat of pavement nceded street frontage to reach the nearese mainuined City street. Variations from this policy will require apprwal of the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga au6~ect to appeals to the Planning Coamiaaion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TRIS 241A DAY OF JANUARY, 1979. PLANNING C~p1ISSI0N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA `,(/~f/ i~J erman Rempel, Chalrm ATIESY--~--~ w6.11i ~'7"c{~ Secretary of the P1aoning Commission I, Tack Lam, Secretary of iha Planning Coamiaaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, da hereby certify that tha foregoing Raaolution vas duly sad regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cammisaioa of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meating of the Planning Co®laslon held on she 24th day of January, 1979, by the follwing vote to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CITY OF COlBSISS TONERS: CARCIA, TOLSTOY, JONES, REI4EL CO!?fISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: DAtD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA DIVII9ION ~'~; PARCEL MAP 59gie TITt~E:BF~~11T1dPL 19-07 ,~ ~~ EXF®Tf:-~ 3 v6 3 WILSON ivE NUE ~ __ _.~~~~ ~T''t R . r.... _ ~ ---?- ~ 4_ ~ ~ 22, 500 SG ? _ z C ZV ~~~ k ' "~ ~ iO s z -~ 3 „ ;' 21 '' 0.17u .ii _ . y lI f~ i f ~ ~~ k a ~ ti6 + ~~~ a gg r 23980 'SF ~ 9 I I F I (YI t2 iB' I I ' I l ~ __ `IO ~ ® = p sF xl,e ~ { i ,zd ~ I ~ V N CITY OF 1TEH: PAR . Ap 5ggh RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1'rrtt: Moei Fi e.e eES~ ~N ., ,~ ENGIIIEERIPTG DIVISION EEC _ F 3v~ RESOLUTION N0. 87-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIYE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 59% NHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 59%, submitted by David Bowen, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 4 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APNis) 201-181-59 located on the south side of Nilson, East of Mayberry Avenue; and NHEREAS, on July 22, 1987, the Planning Coamission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOM, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO LUCAMONGA PLANNING LOMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan, sub,iect to the approval of Variance No. 87-08. 2. That the impravemint of the proposed subdivision Ts consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 5996 is hereby approved sub,iect~o-f e~attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. Temporary access to Nilson Avenue: a, A standard 30' wide commercial drive approach shall be constructed on Nilson Avenue. '~y& RESOLUTION PN 59% b. The temporary access shall be designed and constructed to support public service vehicles. The pavement shall be a minimum of 26' wide. c. A 30' wide easement for public service vehicles shall be provided by separak instrument. d. The temporary access to Nilson Avenue shall be removed and the effeckd troll and stne improvements along W11wn Avenue construckd at the time in the futon that an alkrnak access is provided. M agreement to this effect second by a lien agreement against Parcel 1 shall be execukd prior k recordation of the Parcel Map. 2, M in-lieu fee as contribution k the future urMergrouMing of the exlslnting overhead utilities (klecasmmnlcation and electrical) on the opposik side of Wilson Avenue shall be paid to the City prior k the recordation of the map. The fee shall be one-half of the City adopkd unit amount times the length for the protect fronkge. 3. A kn foot wide privak trail easement shall be provided along the west protect boundary. Building Division 1. Suety shall be poskd and an agreement execukd, quaranketng completion of ail on-sik drainage facilities necessary for dewakring all parcels k the satlsfactton of the Building and Safety Division prior to recording. 2. Final grading plans for each parcel are k 6e submitk4 k Lhe Building and Safety Division for approval prior k issuance of building permit. 3. All slope banks Tn excess of five (5) feet in vertical height and of 5:1 or greakr slope shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or some other al krnative method or erosion control shall De coaplekd k the satisfaction of the 8uilding Official and Ctty Planner, lrrigatton shall be provided k germinak the seed and Mlntain growth for a period of siz months after gent nati or.. 4. On-site improvesknts, necessary for dewakring ar protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that soy be subJect k, or contribuks to drainage flows entering, leaving or within a parcel relative k which a budding perwtlt is requeskd. 5. Grading of the subJect property shall be in accordance with the 3v9 RESOLUTION PM 5996 5. Grading of the subJect property shall De in accordance with the Unifona Building Code, City Oradtng Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading Dlan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptwl grading plan. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the Stata of California to perform such work. Planning Division 1. The residential units shall De placed on the lots to allow for the keeping of horses. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22X0 GY OF JULY, 1987. PIANIIINB COMMISSION OF THE CITY !)F RANCHO CUGMDN~1 Larry tll 1~ a Haan ATTEST: f ra u er, cre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cawatsston of the City of ndudw Cu~mwnya, ao oereby certify Gnat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Caaatsston of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ryOryE I18SENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY ~ rp i 3 } 1 1 t Ys 3' --~ ~~ ~: t s_ •x Sks ~ ~ sV r} :~ sib ~_ ~' t Yij n }Y ~ ~Y is ~Y ~'~ s~' Y! ~= i ~~inj ~'s ~~~ ~!+ ~~ ~~9 Yl i= s ilk id. ~l~ ;~~ ~} ~~': ~~ ~Y i ~~f' p~~ ~~i ~~ ; 3~~ j3~ i~ ~~ s ~j Y~! d~ ~~Y a~ ~~~~ ;~~ ~ •l Y~ ti~~ ~.'. ~iei ~3- ~ ~_ ~- \J~QII w ~ ! ~ ~ ~~~ if ~ 3 ii ~Y f .. Y y ~ 3 ~ ~ + :iii ~ f ~~~ ~ ~' sf° #i i Y~ sY ~ I f 13~ ~ ~~+i i~, '~i rl~ ~i! _ ~ s~ ,.a i3~ :75 • M + _ ry ^ A ~ j~ ~'~ 3~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide G~'t~ ~„ ~~ 7 ~ n O p p 1'll y Z ~„ D 1977 SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION MITH ANNEXATION N0. 6 FOR PARCEL MI1P 9504 (TERRA VISTA)TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/AtiALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 for Parcel Map 9504. The developer of the subJect development has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Resolution Na. 67-433 _ Respectful ubmitted, RH . Attachments ~5"3 RESOLUTION N0. ~~ -,`~~0~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH gNNEXATION N0. 6 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND ACCEPTING THE FINgL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PgRCEL MAP 9504 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of August, 1981, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-434 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4, which Resolution of Intention Na. 87-434 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-434, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing nn fTIP in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdictton to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereoy orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-434, be done and made; and S ECT LO_N 2: The Report filed by the Enai Weer is hereby finally approved; and ~' SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved, SECTION 4; The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tract- s rave been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNE%ATION N0. 6 to STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community PARCEL MAP 9504 Valencia Avenue right-of-way (south and west half) from Haven Avenue to Base Line Road SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and lighting Act of 1982). SECTION 2. General Description Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") provides for operation, servicing, and maintenance of street lights on local and collector streets and secondary arterials (except Church Street) in the Terra Vista Planned Community. All residential developments in Terra Vista are to be pcr^.U1... t^ ..~....w .. o. u.., 'r ai iJ be ugiiitdineu which lie outside residential developments are also to beyannexed far mainte- nance purposes. Thfs Annexation No. 6 annexes to the Oistrlct the following area: o Valencia Avenue right-of-way (south and west half) from Haven Avenue to Base Line Road SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications far street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and specifications are as stipulated in the con- ditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject Cra c#. maps ar deve iopment plans and the assessment diagrams for the enact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvements are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting construction. All improvements will be constructed 6y developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as set forth below, These costs are estimated only; actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation No. 6 is as follows based on high pressure sodium vapor lamps: 5,800 9,500 16,000 27,500 Lumens Lumens Lumens Lumens Valencia Avenue right-of-way 3 0 4 0 Total lights ~ ~ '~ ~- SCE monthly rate, ma in t. and energy x 58.93 x $10.16 x 512,0E x 515.31 Months per year x 12 x 12 x 12 x 12 Totals E 321 S 0 5584 S 0 TOTAL ANNUAL COST 5900,84 The estimated total annual maintenance cost, and estimated annual assessments, for the District after Annexation No. 6 are as follows: Existing Annexation New total District No. 6 for District Total estimated annual maintenance cost 548,378 5900.84 549,278.84 Assessment units:~l~ 1 per single family dwelling unit 1,140 0 1,140 0.5 per multifamily dwelling unit 506 0 506 1,646 0 1,646 Assessment rate: Total Cost * Assessment Units = Assessment per Assessment Unit Annually 529.39 $29.94 ~~~ Computed from all maps recorded as of 7/27/87. Asessment shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in Section 6. SECTION 5. Annexation Diagram A copy of the proposed annexation area is attached to this report and by this reference is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. -2- SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accordance with the fallowing relationship: Land Use Assessment Units Single family residential dwelling 1 unit Multifamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Counctl holds a public hearing in June to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the prior fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing dates. 3. City Cauncll conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer flies a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Counctl conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Cf:kr:9175L 073187 _3_ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. q- ANNEXATION NO. 6 • Ru 7 z a z v~ ~~~ may. VALENCIA cJs~ TERRA VISTA VILLAGE P.M. 9 S 04 :( ~~ C BASE LINE ROAD U . - 5, BBO L:nenS uai •-Ib,ooo l+ss 6~ ,,9i"~°>%; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA ~ p f~A 9 Soo ; t „' COUNTY OF 8AN BSRIVARDINO c; `~~'> STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~ im /lii/1 /}1 L/L R 1R/1T iIi STAFF REPORT ~~' y.~ T o ^ DATE: September 16, 1987 F~ ~ z JIB i> T0: City Council and City Manager is%% FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Afde SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNEXATION N0. 29 AND 22 FOR TRACT N0. 12914 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST GOPHER OF ARCNIBALD AND HIGHLAND AYENUES TO STREET LIGHTING M4INTENANCE DLSTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 RECOMIENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolutions ordering the work 1n connection with Annexation Nas. 29 and 22 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, respectively and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval are resolutions ordering the work 1n connection with Annexation Nos. 29 and 22 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract No. 12914 located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Highland Avenues. The developer of the sub,{ect tract bas been nociiiea or cne puolic hearing Dy mail. The attached resolutions also approve the tentatively approved Engineer's Reports by Resolution Nos 87-439 and 87-441. Respectful) submitted, r :JA• Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. Cj ~ - ~ O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMON G4 ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNE %ATI Ri N0. 29 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. I AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TW1CT N0. 12914 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dsd on the 19th day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-440 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 29 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. B7-440 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally pasted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, rwtices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all person; awning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described Tn said Resolution of Intention No. 81-440, according to the naves and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and man^P.r aS rPaiirPA by la+ _ ,~ fr.... thC,AffidT:it ~, iia{i iiiy uu i Ile itl the office of the City Clerk; and .. WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said Lity Council having vox acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, zs set forth and described in said Resolution of Intentior~ No. 87-440, be done and made; and SECTION 2; ?he Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a~- SECT [ON 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's eport are hereby approved, SECTION 4: The assessments shall not 6e gin until after 60 percent of said tracts Tave been occupied. 3 coo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 29 for Tract No. 12914 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter I, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTIDN 2. General Description This City Council has elected W annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit 'A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain nnll xinr ct raetc. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subiect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of „11 ar any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the sub,{ect area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. R11 improvenents will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as ind'cated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Light?ng Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 29 is shown belay: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lanps Annex New Lamb Lamp Size* ttD No. 29 Total 5800E A44 0 444 9500E 450 3 453 16,000E 16 0 16 22,000E 3 0 3 27.500E 27 0 14 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint, Cost 5800E 444 X f 8.93 X 12 f47,579.04 :SwL 4G3 X ii u. i6 ti i[ = D5,L'L9./6 16,000E 16 X f12.08 % 12 = 2,319.36 22,000E 3 X (13,84 % 12 = 498.28 27,500 14 X f15.31 X 12 = 2,572.08 Total Annual Mai nt. Cost TIIIB,I"~4~ 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: YTO Assessment Unit 13,585; Assess. Unit this Annex. 78 Total = 13,663 Total Annual Maintenance Cost = f108 198.48= 57,92 /year/unit No. o n is n is net Assessment shall apply to each tat as explained in SeMian 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", Annexation No. 29. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessaknt Ieprovea~ents for the District are found to be of general benefit Lo all dwelling units within the District and that assesswtent shall be equal for each unit. Mhere there is acre than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assess+eent for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the nu~ber of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future developeKnt shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preli~tnary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testiawwly and detenaines W font a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the Ctty Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or awdlfles and approves the individual assessa~ents. EXHIBIT "A" Properties and taprove+aents to be included withtn Annexation No. 29 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Arterial PROJECT D/U 5800E Tom[ TR12914 78 _-__ 3 _______ 3 goy ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 2 9 m a ~- `~si`~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ON(iA '' COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ~~ ~ z STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~; ~ r - N RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ -sd~ A RESOLUTINI OF THE CITY CODICIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMON GA ORDERING THE WORK [N CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 22 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 12914 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-442 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 22 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-442 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed ^NOtice of Improvement^, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persorK owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-442, actor ding to the vanes and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the r.ifv rl er k• anA WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and doc anent ary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Inken tion No. 87-442, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally aPprO VE u"; d~- SECTION 3; The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until .,f ter 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. X66 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 22 for Tract No. 12914 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated to Exhibit "A' into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has detenined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Nork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials Por the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with ai rcnara nwnerchin only, and anarhrnts, a Awellina unit shall 6e considered to benefit the save as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subJect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development 1s hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district irciude: the repair, removal or replacement of alt pr arty part of any improvement, providing for the Illumination of the sub,iect area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 including Annexation No. 22 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lasps Annex New Lasq Lamp Size* YTD No.22 Total 5800E 1166 - 1166 9500E ---- 4 4 22,000E ---- - ---- 27.500L ---- - -___ *High Pressure Sodium Yapor Totai Total Annual Lash Size Laams Rate Mo's Mai nt. Cost 5800E 1166 X f 8.93 X 12 (124,948.56 9500E 4 % 510.16 % 12 487.68 22,000E ---- X (13.84 X 12 -0- 27,uuv ---- n (15.31 A 12 ° -U- Totat Annual Mai nt. Cost = TI25;43S~d- 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: YTD Assessment Unit • 4269; Aasess. Unit this Annex. 78 Total •4347 Total Annual Maintenance Cost 1125 436.24 = f28.85/year/unit o. o n is n str ct ~dT- Assessment shall apply Lo each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No.2", Annexation No. 22. These diagrams are hereby lncorpora~~d within the text of this report. SECTIpI 6. assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within Lhe District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mhere there is more than one dwelNng unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. [t is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTiDN 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to fore a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3~ 9 EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 22 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: TRACT D/U 5800E TR 12914 78 _____ Arte~2TTWC 4 -----° 3~0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION NO.2 2 m m S,si~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ON(iA ~- ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNAADINO ~ `? ~ STATE OF CAI.II+ORNIA ~. ~" ;; N ;m STAFF REPORT J~ ~~'~~~~~+. o DATE: September 16, 1987 u T0: City Council and City Manager ~sn J FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering AT de SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNElUTION N0. 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 87-02, OR 86-05 (PARCEL MAP 10444), DR 85-52 ANO DR 85-48 TO STREET LIGHTING 144INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 It 1s recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work 1n connection with Annexation No. 3 to Street lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGNOUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 for Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, OR 86-05 (Parcel Map 10444), OR-85-52 and DR 85-48. The developers of the subject developments have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also aonrnvec tha rentativoly annrn vaA Fnni n<a..~c ma,.,...r h,, muenlnri..,, No. 87-443. Resp fully submitted, RH . Attachments 3~i RESOLUTION N0. ~~~ ~~'ii <-% A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ff RANCHO CUCAMONGq ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 3 TO STREET LIGHTING M4INTENRNCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 87-02, OR 86-05 (PARCEL MAP 10444j, DR 85-52 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19TH day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-444 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 81-444 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-444, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, con terming the ,jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the cor~template4 work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-444, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a~- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's ere hereby approved. SECT [ON 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts~iave been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 PM 10696, DR 67 02,1eDRt86no5 (PM 10444) and OR 85-62 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972), SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to ail areas in «1,.. ~:.._... __a _ _L _.. ......_. u ~~~ u V VII a pal IV4 UYiIJ• 111 the case of condominiums withu airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the Cfty Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub,lect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subJect area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 including Annexation No. 3 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lang Size• Lapps YTD Annex No. 3 New Lamp Tat al 5800E 26 5 31 9500E 0 2 2 22,000E 0 0 0 27,500E __. 0 0 0 •High Pressure Sodi un Vapor Total Total Annual LanD Sfze Lapps Rate Mo's Mai nt. Cost 5800E 31 x f 8.93 % 12 = 53,321.96 9500E 2 X f10.16 % 12 " 243.84 22,000E 0 X (13.84 X 12 -0- 27,500 0 % f15.31 X 12 -0- total Annual Mai nt. Cost f3, 565.80 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: YTD Assessment Unit = 91.95; Assess. Unit this Annex. 80.39 Total 172.34 Total Annual Maintenance Cost f3 565.80 f20.69/year/unit No. o nt s n s r Ct J'ITI-3~ Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexation No. 3. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit Lo all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instftuting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a Distrlct and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the in dlvidual assessments. EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 3 to Street Lighting Maintenance Distrfct 6: PROJECT ACREAGE 580DL 9500E PM 10696 39.39 ____ 1 DR 87-02 9.5 2 __-_ OR 86-05 (PM 10444) 12.68 ---- 1 DR 85-52 18.76 3 ____ 80.39 5 2 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET IIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO. 3 ... . M ~ ~~~ ; 'a ~F~ ...u ,~. PMe /l~ll ~J! s •~ ez n ~ y ~ / ~'\. ~, oM. M/7 Ti q *~~~ ~ ~ •w a - - Feu AM N!/H! O M. ~~`'1 ~~J 4~, a e` F ~` rll 71l4 MCI. ~. L N., W2s Ifl)H•1L `.~ F~~1 -~_ "n _ ~n-ei. _- P. M. b911 RM. D. 6e/4--~t P M vs9v :, :, PMB s'pj~2,3 I .,. .,/ I ,b i,s ,' f' ~,~~°~'. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA .. ~ • ' ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ~~`~~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - N V LV ~'~ =~ r A ,` . r ~ A S if/~S ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEXATION NO.3 ARROW z W Z ~ W Q Y i J _J 3 srH sr. ~ a z ° a = a J a _3 4TH Sr. /~ ` z "' /.I~~ a. W I' ~PROJ i II 81T8 I-10 RN PACIFIC R R. --. _ .au _..._Li.. ~-~nr -yi.--w~ ~•%`'~~, CITY OF RANC80 CUCAMONOA • ~^ ~'~ COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDIIIfO E; ~~ i3 STATE OF CALII~O1tNU ~~~> ~~ - n N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b ANNEI(ATION NO. 3 J .1' - - - - roolnn I ( .. 1 °°:~ ~ P~e4'; rozn1~. v ~ ^I x )K i Oaf . f • .r I' ~ , .. rt .,. ~~• ~ . ~ w s !M .•(6 1~ i NM 1 ! I x . M 1r) Cpl 1 ~~ aPL .1 i. afC ~1 a•. ~, ~i• M`t~1. 1 ~, P pad ~u^c 1 ~ r.iy 111111 "~ ~ u c~ -~viu bq ~ ti M7 w. r ' 1~ J f ^ xr~7 ~~ II ..`. ~..e s~ I ~ 9~y y1 ip lflZ~ tii dry. h~Y W, f yIV1~~ ._ ,~~i ~- JJ l '~~' - ;3s__ ~~~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA . ~~ `~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDII110 ~ ~~'~'t gar ` ;~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - N V~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (~ ANNEXATION NO. 3 ~,~`~ CTPY OF RANCHO CUCASONOA ~: 4 ~ . ~ = COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO ~. ~ ~~ >3PATE OF CALIFORNIA ^ ~ T ~, m_J lV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1981 ~j~ ~ ~< T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Ride SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 30 FOR PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-05 (PARCEL MAP 10444), DR 85-52, DR 85-48, TRACT NOS. 12671-1 TNRU -4 AND TRACT N0. 12650-3 TO STREET LIGHTING M4INTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RECOIMENQATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 30 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 30 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, OR 86-05 (Parcel Map 10444), OR 85-52, DR 85-43, Tract Nos. 12671-1 thru -4 and Tract No. 12650-3. The developers of the subject development have been notified of the public hearing oy mail. Ine attaches resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Resolution No. 87-445. Respectfull submitted, RHM Attachments 3 83 RESOLUTION N0. $ ~ -511 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNE%ATION N0, 30 TO STREET LIGHT [NG M4INTENRN CE DI STRI CI N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 87-02, DR 86-0$ (PARCEL MAP 10444), OR 85-62, TRACT NOS. 12671-1 THRU -4 AND TRACT N0. 12650-3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-446 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 30 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-446 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvenent", was duly and legally pasted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears fran the Affidavit of Pasting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duty mailed to all Dersons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 81-446, according to the names and addresses of such owners as .~,.. ,. ., «_~.., i"~«_ m";t;~., ,. " v~,.W" r,, rtio r:rv rtov4 of rho rite •.~- •.~i i~r. uYY~.~.ri ~... ...-.. ...~ ..N i of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears fran the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and doc anent ary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed war k. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of I"te"t:o" No. 87-446, be done and made; and SECTIQi 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a-~ SECTION 3: The assessments and method of .ssessment in the Engineer's e~rt are hereby approved. SECTION 4; The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nm. 1 Annexation No. 30 for Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, OR 86-05, (Parcel Map 10444), DR 85-52, Tract Nos. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12611-3, 12671-4 and Tract No. 12650-3 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement mai nt an anrc is rn nci dared of ral h_ono_fif •n all __ the District and cost shall beydivided on a per lot basis In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTIGN 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumi,ation of the subject area. SECTION 4, Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 30 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamb Size* Lamps YTD Annex No. 30 New Lamp Total 5800E 444 0 444 9500E 453 8 461 16,000E 16 0 16 22,000E 3 0 3 27.500E 14 1 15 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Totai Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Mai nt. Cost 5800E 444 X S 8.93 X 12 = f 47,579.04 9500E 461 X f10,16 X 12 = 56,205.12 t cnnL t5 v tto no X t2 _ o oto x .,. 22,000E 3 X 513,84 X 12 498.24 27,500 15 X E15.31 X 12 2,155.80 Total Annual Mai nt. Cost (109,357.56 2. Costs Der dwelling Unit: YTO Assessment Unit 13,663; Assess. Unit this Annex. 331,5 Total = 13,994.5 Total Annual Maintenance Cost f109 357.56 = 87.81/year/unit No. or Units in District 13, assessment shall apply *_o each let as explained i,^. Sect ton 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", Annexation No. 30. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall 6e proportional to the nunber of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts pu611c hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a pu611c hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation Na. 30 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: ARTERIAL PROJECT UNITS 5800E ~S5 L~27;5~ PM 10696 79 ---- 2 ---- DR 87-02 19 ---- ---- ---- DR 86-OS (PM 10444) 25 ---- 2 1 DR 85-52 37.5 ---- ---- ---- TR 12650-3 50 ---- ---- ---- TR 12671-1 31 ---- 2 ---- TR 12611-2 42 ---- ---- ---- TR 12671-3 28 ---- 1 ---- TR 12671-4 20 1 331.5 -0- B 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3Q .la.. . ~ w..w, • .M.rE~ ,r., ,M, ~ s P. ilI P,rs nr/s~~s~ } A _L 8LV NI. 6725 • s y1~ ~1 << • 3 ~ + ` r ~ ` ~. ~ z ~ ~ „~, ... ...,... .. /M 7111 w1 ~u » wrrla ar .a, AMIa 1M /SI 1-1 1 "'•~Tf~Yll~ll ~ V . ~ P. M. 6911 w. Ay NI/H3 ~ ~ Awe i~/ir PM. D. S ~~,+ 6e04r-~t , 1OM VS9Y • •~ ~ : .+ ,of~d'j? CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONOA ~: •~ ~ •• l,~ COUNTY OF 9AN BERNARDINO ,:, ~ ;~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ N ~,~ FJ ~?3 Iln I~ L i w •:. t R S Una ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 3Q ARROW z w Y f J N _J = ~ U O 6TH ST. ~ a a 47H ST. ~' a .~ ~ N ~'F+ovBCT 81TE ~_ ~-10 ~HE•4N PACIFICT ~R. r_yN~y _wi~ . a 0 z a 3 W -auu.-- o ~'~'~ C,1:, ~,./ ., CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1~ONaA c; ~ `' ~ ~ t COUNTY OF SAN BEIiNA8DIN0 ~~~ t~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~--' - N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. ~ ~ rOOlwlt I - ~. ~~ ~~ f t ~~ ..• ~ --•a M1, . ~. z ~ 4~ 1 1 , i ~ 1 1 4'fl Hwc •~~~' .~A 1f VMS/ ~ Nwt I .\ y ~•~ .! ~Cr(NIER (Ilt Mkl-. .. OfllVf . . q' I.~ ::~ 1 1~) M1~ ~1'' Ir2 P- s ~Ir~ ~. w'1~ ~~ MI .s 1 1 I. a ,. s I~q 1~ ua¢ ~n* _~ _ _ I-ry~ ; .r. Ai N~ ~~ j .~ .}. r. e ~ ~.~ ci T ti~ M1I 1 M111 ~,r~~; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAl~ONOA ~ pq~-0~ c. `•t COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO t` ` ;~ eTAT$ OF CALII+'ORNIA ~ T Im l~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 34 .'Pc< < ~` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlI0N0A S r ~ , ~ ~ COUNPY OF 8AN BEBNARDIIVO / \ ~~ ~~ 1~ 8TATE OF CALIFORNIA ~: ~'~ N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 3Q ~.~~ crrY of xAxcao cucAxoxaA w ~ •4 r' ! ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BEANARIIINO , \ ~~ ~ I~ STATE OF CALII+'ORx1A ,~ T ~' - Iv ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. ~ - ! ft _.r~ t f:r p`~ s ! '~ 0 ~~ '4 / 4~ •~L I .. e1 s ti - - :k :Q F ~ "~ y I'R~--, ~~ 11%07 0 ND ISIHI~N ~ ~ ' „ i 9 ~ _ e ,~~K. r .. ND 9~1 i 111K705D1.2: ib IP/!J-7D i U _ a ND Iii/00-91 l~3 9 9 I q a Ml15~1 VE ~... ,~J ~ ~~Ot~ r"" /I S .~`` ' w crl~r of aAxc$o cvcAr~oxaA ~ ~•~~~ COUNTY OF SAN BENNABDINO ~a ~ i~ 8TAT8 OF CAI.II+oRPiIA ' T ~-~ Iv CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 t•!I U ~_@ T0: City Council and City Manager is FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEI(ATION N0. 7 FOR TRACT NOS. TRACT NOS. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 AND 12671-4 (TERRA VISTA) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 RECOIlENgITIQ: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District Mo. 4 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 7 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 for Tract Nos. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 and 12671-4. The developer of the subiect tracts has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's ReDOrt by Resolution No. 81-437. Respectfully submitted, RHI Attachments 3 96 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ "S~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COLMCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 AND 12671-4 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dfd on the 19th day of August, 1981, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-438 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 1 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-438 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-438, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City ..F o. ~ti~ r.. ...w:..:. .<a _. __ _. .. _~....- nom nn; ~• .. ~u~~ iu u r.~ylu., ~n 01 dU if IIIO ~IICV 111 LIIC LIIIC, IUl~ln, allU manner as required by law, as appears from~the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received consfdered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-438, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a~---- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's eport are hereby approved. SECTION 4; The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. 3 9~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report fcr ANNEJfATION N0. 7 to STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community Tracts Nos. 12671-1, -2, -3, -4; Milliken Avenue (west half) from Mountain View Drive to north boundary of Tract 12671; Mountain View Drive (north half) from Milliken Avenue to eastern boundary of Tract 12365 SECTION 1. Authorfty for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of CalSfornia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1982). SECTION 2. General Description Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") provides for operation, servicing, and maintenance of street lights on local and collector streets and secondary arterials (except Church Street) in the Terra Vf sta Planned Community. All residential developments in Terra Vista are to be -J •L- pY .-sY YrIL LV VI VIIIp 11LC I,Y• L]Vf OI CO] LU UDC IIIG IIILG 1111.'U which~lieuautside~residential developments are also to be annexed for mainte- nance purposes. This Annexation No. 7 annexes to the District the following area: o Tracts Nos. 12671-1, -2, -3, -4 o Milliken Avenue (west half) from Mountain View Drive to north boundary of Tract 12671 o Mountain View Orive (north half) from Milliken Avenue to eastern boundary of Tract 12365 SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specs fica tion5 for street Lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and specifications are as stipulated in the con- ditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engtneertng Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps or development plans and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvements are hereby made a part of thfs report to the same extent as ff said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be Incurred for street lighting construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as set forth below. These costs are estimated only; actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation No. 7 is as follows based on high pressure sodium vapor lamps: 5,800 9,500 16,000 27,500 Lumens Lumens Lumens Lumens Tracts Nos. 12671-1, -2, -3, 04 26 0 0 0 Milliken Avenue right-of-way 0 3 0 0 Mountain View Drive right- of-way 8 0 0 0 Total lights -34- -3- -~ -~ SCE monthly rate, ma int. and energy x E8.93 z 510.16 x E12.08 x E15.31 Months per year x 12 x 12 x 12 x 12 Totals E3,644 E 365 E 0 E 0 TOTAL ANNUAL COST E 4,009 The estimated total annual maintenance cost, and estimated annual assessments, for the District after Annexation No. 7 are as follows: Existing Annexation New total Of strict No. 7 for District Total estimated annual maintenance cost Assessment units:~l~ 1 per single family dwelling unit 0.5 per multifamily dwelling unit Assessment rate: Total Cost ~ Asse5sment Units Assessment per Assessment Unit Annually E29.94 ~1~ Computed from ail maps recorded as of 7/27/87. E 49,278.84 E 4,009 E53,278.84 1,140 120 1,260 506 0 506 1,646 120 1,766 E30.17 Asessment shall apply to each residential dwe111ng as enumerated in Section 6. SECTION 5. Annexation Dtaaram A copy of the proposed annexation area is attached to this report and by this reference is hereby Sncorporated within the tent of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residentiai property within the District in accordance with the following relationship: Land Use Assessment Units Single family residential dwelling 1 unit MultSfamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Council holds a public hearing in June to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the prior fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution o9 Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's ReDOrt. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of IntentSOn to Annez to District and sets public hearing dates. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and detenninec to annwr in rho n~~..~......w_________ ___________ . _.__. .__ _. ___~~_...~ ... yi ..~ccw uya. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the LSty Council, 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, ar modifies and approves the individual assessments. CF:kr:9175L2 080687 -3- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Q- ANNEXA710N NO. 7 ~~ ~~ > ~ J~,,~ o° w`~ ,,o;~ crier of a~NCxo cuc~,xorrae ~iT~ ;~~ COUNTY OF 8AN BEBNASDIIdO ~; ~~ STATE aF cw>'.iFOxNin - N Vi ~> im ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ¢ ANNEXATION NO. 7 ^~^ 9500 LUMENS 5.~~~~' ~,: -~ ~~ ~7 ;a Im CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ON4A COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO sTATS OF CALIFORNU- - N ! 5800 LWw~NS RESOLUTION N0. O / - S ~~ A RESOLUTION OF 1'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNEXATION N0. 7 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3 and 12671-4 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention Na. 87-454 to order the therein described work 1n connection with Annexation No. 7 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-454 was duly and legally published in Lhe time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and iR1EREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of Lhe Resolution of Intention were duty mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-454, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as aooears fmm tha Affidavit ^f Hollis; x ilia in the office of the Ctty Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,iurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by Lhe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-454, be done and made; and SECTION 2: De it further rv'soived that the report filed by the engineer ishere~finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of ass essment~- tTie Engineer's Report are Hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unt~fT after b0 percent of said tracts have been occupied. yay CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEJfATION N0. 7 to LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Yista Planned Community Tract; 12671-1, -2, -3, -4, and street right-of-way SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1982). SECTION 2. General Description Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") maintains street plantings, parks, trails, and similar areas throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. All residential developments in Terra Vista are to be annexed to the District pursuant to Ordinance No. 190; areas to be maintained which lfe outside residential developments are also to be annexed for maintenance purposes. This Annexation No. 7 annexes to the District the following area: o Tracts Nas. 12671-1, 12671-2, 12671-3, 12671-4 o Milliken Avenue Parkway (west half) from Mountain View Drive to northern boundary of Tract 12671 o Mountain Vtew Orive (north half) from Milliken Avenue to eastern boundary of P.M. 8842 All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the tract maps (or by separate instrument) as roadway right-of-way, dedica- tions, or easements to be granted to the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications far the landscaping within residential tracts have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part pf the improvement plans for those tracts. The plans and specifications are in conformance with the Planning Commission conditions of approval. Plans and specifications far landscaped areas outside resfdenttai Bracts have been separately prepared by the developer. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagrams for [he exact iocation of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based an historical data, contract analysis, and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assess- ment purposes will be as set forth below. These costs are estimated only: actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation No. 7 is as follows: Trails 8 Streetl Parkways Greenways Medians Trees Tracts 12671-1, -2, -3, -4 0 0 0 120 Milliken Avenue Parkway 1,250 0 0 0 Mountain View Drive 9,120 0 0 0 Total areas (square feet) 16,370 0 0 120 Unit cost (annual) 35Q per 35G per 15Q per E5 per sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. tree Totals S 5,730 0 0 S 600 TOTAL ANNUAL COST E 6,330 'Local street trees on 1y. The estimated total annual maintenance cost, and estimateE annual assessments, for the District after Annexation No. 7 are as follows: Existing Annexation New total District No. 7 for Otstrict Total estimated annual maintenance cost 5198,379 S 6,330 5204,709 Assessment untts:(1) 1 per single family dweiiing unit 1,140 120 1,260 0.5 per multifamily dwelling unit 6 6 ~ 50,5 T ~ I ~ Assessment Rate: Total Cost • Assessment Units Assessment per Assessment Unit Annually b120.52 5115.91 (1)Computed from alt maps recorded as of 7/27/81. -2- Assessment shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in kction 6. SECTION 5. Annexation Diagram A copy of the proposed annexation diagram is attached to this report. By this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs far the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accor- dance with the following relationship: Land Use Assessment Units n3i-gTe~amily residential dwelling -Tu~- Multifamily residential dwelling .5 unit The City Council holds a public hearing in June to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the prior fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. Z. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing dates. 3. Ciiy Cuuncii conduces pubiic hearing, consigers all testimony and deter- mines to annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. CF:kr:917LM2 080687 -3- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4' ANNEXATION N0.7 ,~``~ CITY OF RANCHO ClK".A~~K 3~I ~f a ~ ~ V] "~ ~z ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP im ')fJ. ~dL:JC( ~. o SI b 6~0 ~Yf, u~i9 3~~ .. N STAFF REPORT f~G~~~'~ DATE: September 16, 1987 ,I ~'I T0: City Council and City Manager -- ----'' 19.7 FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE VIORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 5 FOR PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 87-05, DR 86-05 (PARCEL MAP 10444), OR 85-52 AND DR 85-48 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 5 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 5 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-05, DR 86-05 (Parcel Map 10444), DR 85-52 and DR 85-48. The developers of the sub,{ect development have been notified of the public hearing by matt. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Resolution No. 87-449. Fespecifu^j sut,~dLtaC, _'--~-~~ RMM: Attachments ~0 9 RESOLUTION N0. ~~~- ~~~" A RESOLUiI ON OF THE CITY COLN CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 ORDERING THE WORK IN CON NE CTICN WITH ANNE%ATICN N0. 5 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRICi N0. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 9461, PARCEL MAP 10696, DR 87-05, DR B6-O5 (PARCEL MAP 10444), AND DR 85-52 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Lucamonga did on the 19th day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-450 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 5 t: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-450 was duly and legally published fn the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons avning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-450, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same an no a.5 ~~ the last ~;;i,;y u, a> knuwn to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and doc anent ary, concerning the Jurisd',ction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having maw acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Res al ution of Intention No. 87-450, he done and made; and SECT ICN 2; Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of ass essmen iR~n EFie Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: 8e it finally resolved Lhat said assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON G4 Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ANNENATION N0. 5 For Parcel Map 9481, Parcel Map 10696, DR 87-02, OR 86-05 (PM 10444), and OR 85-52 SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requfrements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Calffornia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2, General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and SDecifications The Dl ans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub,)ect development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the lands raced areas. rno ple^~ °^; p. cif iCat~u~o ia• lands capes improvement on the individual development ~is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. R11 improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 9 parcels, totaling 6,051 sq~uarc feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and stone drain within the pro,)ect. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the pr o~ect boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all other pros ects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will 6e assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Naven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street frau west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and sane parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 1 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing District Totai estimated maintenance cost 52,070 Assessment units 8 Total wst - assessment unit for year and month f~70 (258.75/year or f21.56/mo. Zone 2 Existing Rnnexation New District No. 5 Tot a1 Tnf al -. timatcd -- maintenance area- Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment acres f380,399.51 f107.63 5380,507.14 Total cost r assessment O x f.30 f 0 /year 0 /mo. unit for year and month T380?OT .13- Assessment shall aDDly to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A', by thfs reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shad be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to Lhe next acreage for eaUi iot or parcel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in Mqy, the Cfty Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 5 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PRO,IECi ACREAGE PM 9481 - (parcel one) g.g5 ( t e 1 PM 10696 _ (parcel on ) 4.04 (parcel 4wo) 9.95 (parcel three) 25.38 DR 87-02 9.50 DR 86-05 (PM 10444) 12.66 DR 85-52 18.78 OR 85-48 27,28 TOTAL: 107.62 Acres IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION N0. 1 Area g~. Ft• HTVPl1 aVPI111P A Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 Resolution No. 87-514 Page 7 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. 3i W 2 W i 2 Q S J W_ ~iC ~1~n ~.~~''~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,~IOIVGA r _1 ~ ;~ EN4INEERING DIVISION "~n +' VICINITY MAP ]CY Cf111: ~~:iCtl Resolution No, g~-51ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Page 8 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNExATION N0. S i~•.. • F~ ICI, l 8 LV .„ .1.,~'n .w.. ~.- P M N~. f.72! Ma wrJ~f•~s . - ~ , .., •+h i ...1 : • w f` ,:. Mp • I i 0 f. M. ~~ ,~ uJO ~ ~ l j y ~ ~.. Twee r 1 EMI. Y// . • r ~ ~ ' IN 7~1+ MIIgYY ~ ~'~" rw.s~w ~ S a/n t IN/1Me~ „ W. -J ~I I P. M. NII ;` /.W YI /MI• ~ ~ •' P. M.D. S II' ~ ,iris ~e/a~-~r ~e ~ P M YSlV , ~ w n P" Q e:' PMS 1'~ ~j. j •w e, ~~ F~~ z~ ~~ -,~ ii ~1 6 ;~ TY OF RAI~fCtiO Cl/~~IOPiGA ENGMEERING DIVISION ' T VICINI'iY MAP IV ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMResolution No, 87.914 Pege 9 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0..3 ANNEXATION N0. $ ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCPu~i( E ~ ~~ ENGINEERING DIVISION 6$~~f VICINITY MAP N Resolution No. 87-514 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Page 30 LANpSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. $ . rd v: v roorff~li - - 1' ' I o , 1 Po•i .. . • g 7 1 ~ ~, BY hr tlt~1.~..,4 hf .. v } • w fti I O 1 j I1Y1 ~ IrS F~ .. fr : ~~ 1 ~ ~ t M hn 1 ~~ h h r ri1 1 f ~ ;' tK . ` ' ~~• i~NC 1 ~ L i. PM ~ ~ Nwt . .. ^ 1 _ t~:~ . w r~=~ 1 --f-..-- - -- 1...~1 ~r: ---- - ~ ~- ~1'''° h ~r ~. _a .•• ~TrNrER (~:'e 4tk1~ pIrV6 I~~i ~/rt .4~1 qua .., fi I^ (~, hr ~•f~,~ A f yh• •~ ~ M T ! ~ M ~ f9 tr I~ o Q~'fq ~[ a~na, I-~frr I., .~¢ ~ of frn ~. ~.~,~""~~ ~ CITY OF RAfYCHO CUCAI~tO[VGA yI .~~ ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION ~1..="_..s~ VICINITY MAP im n N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Reaolu[ioa No. 87-,14 Page 11 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. $ -.-1 r. ~~s `t z~~ • 6 ~~ im TY OF RANCHO ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c~ MO STAFF REPORT ~,~ ~ ~o n DATE: September 16, 1987 ~, il ~ l T0: City Council and City Manager m ivn y FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering A1de SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION MI TN ANNEXATION N0. 37 FOR TRACT NOS. 12650-3 and 11549-1 (MEDIAN) TO LANDSCAPE IMINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RECOMMENDATION: It is reconmmended that City Counctl approve the attached resaiutlon ordering the work in connection with Mnexation No. 37 to Landscape Maintenance D15trict No. 1 and aDDroving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 37 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Nos. 12650-3 and 11549-1 (median). The developers of the subJect tracts have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution aiso approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Resolution No. 87-451. Nnen w_tAn ,.. Suuiui Lieu, _ , RHM: :diw Attachments yiq RESOLUTION N0. ~ 7 ' `J ~ S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 37 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REDORT FOR TRACT N0. 12650-3 AND 11549-1 (MEDIAN) NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention Na. 87-452 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 37 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-452 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by Taw, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file 1n the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by taw, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolutfon of Intention were duly mailed to ali persons owning real property proposed to be assested for the improvements described in Bald Resolution of Intention No. 87-452, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears an the last mailing or as known to the Cfty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duty maned to the time, form, ., nn manner as required 6y law, as aDDears frru" th_ .!:ffiu'urii or mailing on file to the nffi_c cf the Ciiy W erk; and WHEREAS, said City Councii having duty received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derfved therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 81-452, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resoived that the assessments and method of assessment i-~- n tfie~ngineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until a-#ter-b0 percent of said tracts have been occupied. t/.70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 37 for Tracts 12650-3 and 11549-1 (Median) SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requireaents of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District Mo. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all tots within 12650-3 and 11549-1 (Median) as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. plans and Specifications The D1ans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. 1, ..i ......--.. i. L--nL.. .n. A.. •n •L- -~~L,..-~ •-...~ .-... -- A-..-,-.~--• -1.- .-A LL.. .. .. w~ u . uuJ ~.. ~. muy .. ~p...u ~ ,. ~ uu assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the indfvidual development is hereby made a part of this report Lo the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance [OSts for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance O15[rict No. 1 including Annexation No. 31 is as follows: Existing Annex New District No. 37 Total Landscape Area 866,624 450 867,074 No. of D. U. 8,118 25 8,693 Per lot Annual Assessment _867,014x. f29.92/Unft/Year Assessment shall aDD1Y to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessaent diagram. Where the development covered by this amexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by m active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibtt A•, by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text oP this report. SECTION 6. pssessmmt Improvements far the District are found to De of general benefit to all lots within the District end that assessment shall De equal for earn unit. Mhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the nuaAer of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Louncii will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Ennineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to DSstricL and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers alt testimony and determines to Annez to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, Lhe City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a Dublic hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. Properties and imlmoveaents to be included within Annexation No. 37 to Landscape MalMenance District No. 1: WIINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U _ - - ---~-- ~~. Ff. 12650-3 509.5 ------ _____-_---- 11549-1 (Median Island) Blue Oue Drive 450 -- * Tract has previously been annexed adding new landscape area to district. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.97 9;E ~ ><. to K,.R. i ME ISIHPa y~~ ,,,~~.,..,.., a .....__..-~=~ M! U~iIJ~M ~ ~ e MO M1/00~91 f! I _ _ i O~ ~r~~r ~;iei ~ ~, Mi LS~N ^VE~ ' win ewe ew . ~ ,,a"`'1`~!c CITY OF RANCHO CUCFuvIC }I'~, ~ ~~ •~.,.~, :~ .. ENGINEERING DIVISION i o~En ~~> VICINITY MAP n N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0.3J Area to be annexed - d50 sa.1t. O 'i' iii m ~~~! ®~ ®?~ ®, IVY ~ ' ~ fl tl ~ DIY( i ~ I °s N k ` I a/ r/ / 'f\ ~~ ~ ~i ~`~~~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,~I< fI'~f t ~~ _~~". `c ;; ~ 9~ ENGINEERING DIVISION `'~_:' VICINITY MAP N - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT ~~' ~~~~.~ o DATE: Septe~ker 16, 1987 E'- a z [] D T0: City Council and City Manager X977 FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: JuQy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNE%ATION N0. 21 FOR TRACT N0. 12650-3 LOCATED NORTH OF HILLSIDE, EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 RECOMMENDATION: It 1s recomwended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Mnexation No. 21 t0 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Mnexation No. 21 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for Tract No. 12650-3 located north of Hillside, east of Naven Avenue. The developer of the subject tract has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively aDDraved Engineer's Report by Resolution No. 87-447. Respectfu submitted, r RHM. w Attachments RESOLUTION N0. $ 7' S ~ Lo A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE NORK ;N CONNECTION WITN ANNEXATION N0. 21 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 12650-3 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-448 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 21 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-448 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the Ctty Clerk; and NNEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, iocation, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-448, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly maned in the time, form, and manner as requires oy iaw, as appears from the ntfidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered eviderH:e, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-448, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a~ SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e~~I port are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. y~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDNGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 21 for Tract No. 12650-3 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is to compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Cou~11 has elected to annex the tracts enumerated 1n Exhibit "A" Into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on inra7 roetAontial ctreets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and syecificatlons for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights arc as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment dlayyram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and speciflcatians for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said pions and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the stroet lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any fagrovement, providing for the illwination of the sub,lat area. ExHIB1T "A" Properties and igrove~ents to be included within Annexation No. 21 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Arterial TRACT D/U 5800E ~1500L~T,560C TR12650-3 50 21 ----- ------- SECTION 4. Estiawted Costs No costs witl be incurred for street lighting iprove~ent construction. All laprcveaalnts will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estiawted that aaintenance costs for assess~ent purposes will be as 1ndlcated below. These costs are estiawted only, actual assessiaents will be based on actual cost data. The estlabted fatal cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 including Mnexation No. 21 1s shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Laags Annex New Laaq Laau 51ze* YTD No. 21 Total 5900E 1145 21 1166 9500E _--- __ ---- 22,000E _ 27.500E ---- -- _-- •N1gh Pressure Sod1u~ Yapor Total Total Annual Laac Size Laxos Rate No's Ma1nt. Cost 5800E 1166 X f 8.93 X 12 5124,948.56 95~L ---- X f10.16 X 12 _O_ 22.E ---- X f13.84 X 12 • -0- 27,500 ---- X f15.31 X 12 • -0- Total Annual Maint. Cost • f124,948.56 2. Costs per dwelling Untt: YTD Assessatent Unit • 4219; Assess. Unit this Annex. 50 Total = 4269 Total Annual Nalntenance Cost f124 948.56 • f29.27/year/unit o. o n s n s r ct ~d3b9- AssessaknL shall eppiy to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. AssessaKnt Otaora~a Copies of the proposed Assessarent Diagraaa are attached to this AnnexatlondNo~a 21 ed These dlagrawxtiare hercbyn incorporated within the text of this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.,2 ANNEXATION NO. 2 / -__ ~ .- ,, sz • ~a'~5' °a ~s R ~s F!~a S~ ~' ;.$ A EL~l:I ~a ~~ ~ ~ .t 7' / ~ tt e rw~cT ` lara '~`~ W Q j ~~J w e I mA4T 9SE7 ~' QF# / ' / !~~- _j~y 9 1I ME ISI HI~N ;;may ~ ] .S y~pp]IMMO AAff 954311 ~ TGACl9542-2 -'~ i i rrr~.ev - ~a MIL~~VE7 n.ur 4 ~ .i:wor~ prr ~ ,.ai`~. CITY OF AANCT;O CUCAIdONOA sr ~~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO .. _ ~~7` ~ ~;~- ~ sTATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ T ~° °> 1~ Im - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Juntor Engineering Aide (~,p c~^ Lr y o o } A J ~/ II> 19]7 SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION MITH ANNE%ATION N0. 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 9504 (TERRA VISTA) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 RECq/EMDATIOM: ]t is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work 1n connection with Annexation No. 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 for Darcel Map 9504 (Terra Vista). The developer of the sub,)ect development has been notified of the public hearing by natl. The attached resolution also approves the tentatively approved Engineer's Report by Resolution No. 87-435. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~ RHM A: dl Attachments y3 a.. RESOLUTION N0. $ 7 -,S ~7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNEKATION N0. 6 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 9504 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 19th day of August, 1987, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 87-436 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 6 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, which Resolution of Intention No. 87-436 was duly and legally published Tn the time, form and manner as required 6y law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of intention, headed "Notice of Improvement', was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of intention No. 87-436, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the sane appears on the iast mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk: and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived the ref ram and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the propcsed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 87-436, be done mnd made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer ,sT rlere~y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Ge 1t further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment n t e nglreer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said o,sessments shall not begin untTT~ter 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. y33 CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA engineer's Report for ANNEXATION N0. 6 to LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community PARCEL MAP 9504 Eastern half of Haven Avenue median from Base line Road to Valencia Avenue. SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1982). SECTION 2. General Description landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (the "District") maintains street plantings, parks, trails, and similar areas throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. All residential developments in Terra Yista are to be annexed to the District pursuant to Ordinance Na. 190; areas to be maintained which lie outside residential developments are also to be annexed for maintenance purposes. This Annexation No. 6 annexes to the District the following area: o Eastern half of median planting in Haven Avenue from Base Line Road to Valencia Avenue All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the tract maps (or by separate instrument} as roadway right-of-way, dedfca- tions, or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping within residential tracts have been prepared by the developer and ~~ave been approved as part of the improvement plans far those tracts. The plans and specifications are in conformance with the Planning Commission conditions of approval. Plans and specifications for landscaped areas outside residential tracts have been sepa rateiy prepared by the developer. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this ~eport to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis, and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance casts for assess- ment purposes will be as set forth below. These costs are estimated only; actual assessments wfll be based on actual cost data. The estimated annual maintenance cost for Annexation No. 6 is as follows: Trails 6 1 street2 Parkwa s Greenways Medians Trees Haven Avenue median 6,130 Total areas (square feet) X130 Unit cost (annual) per per 15d per per sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. tree Totals E 919 TOTAL ANNUAL COST E 919 1Nalf width median in Haven Avenue. 2Loca7 street trees only. The estimated to tai annual maintenance cost, and estimated annual assessments, for the Df strict after Annexation No. 6 are as follows: Existing Annexation New total District No. 6 for District Total estimated annual maintenance cost 5197,460 E 919 5198,379 Assessment units:(1) 1 per single family dwelling unit 1,140 0 0.5 Der multifamily dwelling unit 506 0 l;blC6 ~ Assessment Rate: Total Cost ~ Assessment Units =Assessment Der Assessmen*_ U^!! A,^,rually 5119.96 5120.52 (1)Computed from all maps recorded as of 7/27/87. -2- A55esscent shall apply to each residential dwelling as enumerated in Section 6. SECTION 5, Annexation Diagram A copy of the proposed annexation diagram is attached to this report. By this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all developed residential property within the District in accor- dance with the following relationship: Land Use Assessment Units n3~ gl~`amily residential dwelling ~- Multifamiiy rosidential dwelling ,S unit The City Council holds a public hearing in June to detem~ine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the prior fiscal year. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Aeport. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing dates. 3. Li ty Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and deter- mfnes to annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. CF:kr:917LM 073187 -3- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MA!NTENANC~ DISTRICT ANNEXATION N0. b .. TERRA VISTA VILLAGE P.M. 9504 4 RESOLUTION N0. 87-J~Jy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING THE C[TY MANAGER AS THE FIRST MEMBER OF THE CCFC FI NRNC[NG COMMISSION OF AUTHORITY ANO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AS ALTERNATE WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("City`) does hereby resolve: WHEREAS, on September 2, 1987, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution 87-487 thus entering into a Joint Powers Agreement with the Cities of Fairfield, Santa Rosa and Palm Springs for the purpose of creating an agency to exercise the common powers to acquire and dispose of, through lease, lease-purchase, installment sale agreements, or otherwise, such property as may be necessary or convenient; and, WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement provides that this Council shall appoint one member of the Commission of the Authority; and, WHEREAS, Resolution 81-487, Section 3, appointed the Director of Administrative Services of the City as first member of the Commission of Authority to serve as representative of the City, until appointment of his respective successor by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED, as follows: SECIIUN 1: the City Manager of the City is hereby appointed as the tirst member of the Commission of the Authority to serve as representative of the City. The Director of Administrative services is hereby appointed as alternate to said Commission. PASSED, PROVED, and ADOPTED t/his !16th day of September, 1981. AYES: j ~ __ ~w.~F C~.C,~ NOES: n ABSENT: ~--~ Dennis L. Stout, , ayer ATTEST: Oeverly A. Aut e et, ,ty Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA STAFF REPORT DATE: September i6, 1981 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Duane Baker, Admin. Rsst. ~ GJ~~~ ~' v ''n 4 F~~ $ z c:!, la r9n I SUBJECT: Appeal of Staff Decision to Remove the Median Island in the 92D0 Block of Monte Vista RECONIN:ND11TI011: City Council should deny the appeal of staff's decision to remove the median island in the 9200 block of Monte Vista. Background/Analysis Mrs. Judy Gundeson contacted the Maintenance Section by phone to discuss the possibility of replanting a tree in the parkway. The Gundersons had planted a tree in the area between a neighbor's drive approach and their awn. The original neighbors move and the new owners of the house had the tree cut down. The new owners had the tree cut down without permission or a permit. Code Enforcement is working on this situation. Additionally, these new owners did not cut the stump down far euuuyii iu aiiuw iur ion us~ayiny re-es tabiisimien t. vu ue Eni urcaneni is working on this situation as well. Nhen this matter was investigated in the field by Jeff Barnes, Maintenance Supervisor, he advised Mrs. Gunderson that the tree would not be able to be replanted in the same place in the parkway because the tree would be too close to the concrete. However, replacement of the tree will be required to occur westerly of the two driveways where clearance is sufficient. qt this same meeting in the field, Mrs. Gunderson brought up the issue of landscaping the median. During this discussion it was made clear that if any landscaping were done it would have to be done by the City or a licensed contractor in accordance with all City standards and regulations. It was pcinted out that landscaping on the median would not be aiiowed to be installed or maintained by residents. 4~8' CCSR SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 PAGE 2 It was recommended by Jeff Barnes that if Mrs. Gunderson would like the City to consider landscaping the median, she should write a letter to the City Engineer with such a request. Mrs. Gunderson was made aware that such a request would have to canpete with other possible landscaping protects throughout the City. Also, if the median were landscaped a method would have to be created to provide for maintenance. This vehicle method most likely be annexing the area into Landscape Maintenance District 1. On August 6th, the City Engineer received a letter from Erit and Judy Gunderson requesting the landscaping of the median. The Landscape Designer reviewed the island and the City Engineer reviewed the median island with a consultant for the City's Joint Powers Insurance Authority. It was the opinion of the JPA consultant and myself that the current configuration of the median has same very serious problems. These problems are that the median is not very visible at night and is in an unusual configuration, thus causing the potential for traffic problems. The second problem is that the median constricts the with of the street to 18 ft. This width fs below the Foothill Fire District standard of 26 ft. A response was sent to the Gundersons on August 26th in which it was noted that the median had sane problems. Further, it was noted that since this median island has officially come to the attention of the City, the City is obligated to correct the problems which exist. it it tho rernmmonAaf in_n n_i Mn rt.,. [.... t..,..... ...t •G ..u _~ consultant concurs, that the median island be removedentirely. Rest y~,submitted, ~/// H. M neer RHM:DB:jh Attachments U39 meaian isian 18' NORTH ,~8, Monte Vista s v yd ~R/C ~'~~Piso.~ 9263 /I,~~r~ ~.sfG s~.l. /font to CCCnnenq.[~ Cc ~/~/ . ~9~sr 6; /y'~7 //P4 /` s r 2 A/ ,/ ~/ % AP ~L/PGJC O T' ~Ij/S /<'/lP~ /S 1/o i~e~f,N.s f Yo u n Qss/sfan re ijy ///~S~cP:~ z/ije /S~isc~ /i! LFAC .n.r~c/ ~ ~ eU!' S~~PP~. Wcuyo/ /r7c/f ^.~u2 ~a~P 4~d ot/f~2 s ~P4P,ay /!7a/k/ f^.e'~scn7, in. ny p!Y/~ieq /~purL Ljr~ /iJ f.~is .Cl"4J`~PlL ~c~/~ ~p ~, ~ i2/ rO2 `/pv ~ C O/Y S/©i' 4 lion ~i? zr~is /l7cJzYr 2 , CifY Of cA ~_ fNGINf[NpyO CUCAyONCA ~~l ~ji ~.,~Jr~ ~~y 1 ~ •-. .! is CIT`.' O~° R1\CHO CUCAMON is r.~,+~ ,- F..-.~ ..r:c ,•i.~ve9~ie~ August 26, 1987 Eric Gunderson 9263 Monte Vista St. Rancho Cucamonga, LA 91701 Oear .1r. Gunderson: In response to your letter of August 6th, the Engineering Division has reviewed the island on your street. The landsczping of the island on your street must compete with other projects in the City for limited funds. The funds that the City does have available for this type of protect are used in areas where there is a wider and sore general benefit. There are no funds available for a protect of this type in a residential neighborhood. Nhile reviewing this situation, Engineering staff recognized a problem with the island on your street. The street in its current configuration has some potential problems. Now that the City has Seen made aware of these pr•>Siems, it is obligated to act. The island on your Street has been referred to the Maintenance Section for removal. The island has Seen placed on the maintenance schedule for removal within the nett few months. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me or Duane Baker at 989-1862. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEE It{,CrDIVISION ~ .. / ~~% -,~. `city ngineer RHM/ia . . , ,.•.•. yy~ 4eun. Ihct,~n~ ~9rot,~' cvnGQ, Couv~ci~Lmem.6zw g cam ~.>~ cw, ap~.eu Q ~' ~z- ~ .,b~.~. ~.+oyeek mr.c, +-o 0.~ . ~ ". ~~ s ~- ~.~. a~,.~, ..ae .~-+ Clo ~eey anz, rtp-~v I;,., ~-~, , ~~ /~ ~ II ~ 111 Mn/'DI A~/M ~~~ , uI~ Ce..i.._.I ~ ~q~~ ~.~ c~~„~, C~ IEOEI-EO cm ov rtAncllo cucArorcca ADMINISTRATION SFP 021987 TA19~IYIw11~l~b E ~J ~~ 7 p8~ ~/ 43 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 16, 1987 To: City Council and City Manager cU~ O,~ ~ ' o. Ih F_" ~ ~iZ 19'7 ~ I From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Ctvil Engineer SubJect: Adoption by City Council of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire by Eminent Domain, an easement across three real properties located at the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Main Street for the construction of the Area YII Storm Drain RECDMIEIDATIDN: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution to acquire 6y Eminent Domain, an easeaent across a portion of the three real properties located at the southwest corner of Turner Avenue and Main Street 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of the Area VII Storm Drain BACK6RBIMD/ANALYSIS It is noted that the Pions and Specifications for this Storm Drain were accepted by Council on August 19, 1986 with a report pertaining to the Right-of-Nay requirements. The Bid Opening for the Storm Drain was held on Scptaaba, ~ :SU7 auJ i> wnaiuereu fur Novara ana nxecutron On October 7, 1987. A study has been conducted pertaining to the design and construction of the Area VII Storm Drain and the City has found no other alternative other than the aligning of the storm drain through a portion of these three properties. The ma,Ior purpose of the proposed storm drain is to provide storm drain protection for these three properties and those areas located west of Turner Avenue and south of Feron Boulevard, part of which is proposed for the site of the new North Town Park. This undeveloped area is a Bumped area and presently floods due to lack of a drainage outset. The Area YII Drain will, when completed, provide for storm drain protection to this area and an elimination of the flooding condition. Respectf 11 u fitted, RNM:HM: Attachments ~yy RESOLUTION NO. ~ / -S~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OELLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a stuQy pertaining to the design and construction of stone drainage for Area VII ("Lower Turner Masterplan Stores Drain") and the aiigreent of such drain to Oeer Creek Channel. The principal purpose of the proposed stores drain is to provide stores drain protection for the North Town Park proposed to be locted west of Turner Avenue and south of Feron Boulevard. Based upon the stogy conducted, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible allgneent for the proposed stores drain will require the acquisition of a right-of-way easement for placement of the storm drain across a portion of three separate residential parcels; 11) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resoiution, the City has made an offer to the owners of record to acquire the Droperty for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuations; (iii) Pursuant t0 California Government Code Section 40404 (b), a City may acquire private property Dy condemnation when it is necessary fu ri ,his of :1 u) fcr ul Yil a, pc,.G l i Yl,d ab 4YCUY,r "i, !fv) On September 16, 1987, this Council held a duly noticed pubttc hearing pursuant to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution NOM, THEREFORE, it 15 htreby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1: !n all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part R, of this e-R soTuft"an. -1- yys Section 2: Those portions of the three separate contiguous parcels, upon wFi-cTi the acquisition of a right-of-way easement for stone drain purposes is required in the public interest, are situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Cal7fornia, and are more specifically outlined in the legal descriptions and maps attached hereto as Exhibit "A•, Exhibit "B" and Exhtbtt "C", all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dur~ the above-referenced public heartng, including written staff reports, the City's Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed protect; D. The proposed protect is planned or located 1n the manner that will be most compatlDie with the greatest public good and the least private irdury; c. The property defined 1n this Resolution is necessary for the proposed protect; and, d. M offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the teems of California Government Code Section 7267.2. Section 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to nut .n ~..-.,, dLicri b.d ii, ~c-."._ ,.,~.. y ~~wu c aw"a, uy ~IWleCOingS In Eminent Domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, 7n the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the properties described herein for the purpose of condemning and acquiring a right-of-wdy easement for storm drainage purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination 1n accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security Dy way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resotutlon. -2- yy(o LEGAL DESCRIPTION (STORM DRAIN EASEMENT) Assessors Parcel No. 209-085-16 An easement for storm drain purposes along that portion of Lots 1 and 2, Block 12, according to the Map of the Town of nest Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 13 of Maps, Page 1 and 2, Record of San Bernardino County; said easement more particularly described as follows: The south twenty (20) feet of said Lots 1 and 2 of said Block 12 of the Town of West Cucamonga. I ' I i A.T. A S F ~$ RA/LROAO l~9 ar' . 1 ~~ IO 8 ~O. n ; N~ 1 pt~ r1 1 ,2~ VD ~ `r Iti oe' ~ a ` i2 ~q~ , c= ~ 1 D J ~ P~ ~ J I ~~ r I " ~ J J~I~IJ 1 Jr ~~~~/r ~ i ~ U ~~>>~iJl ~~~~~~r~ ~ ~. , 04~87~321 MA/ N 57REEr n O ^ M `~l Q O ~ (,~ ~Y ~~ ^~ e~ h' s ,~ 0 ~~ ~~ e n 26 EXf1I BIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (STORM DRAIN EASEMENT) Assessors Parcel No. 209-085-17 An easement for storm drain purposes along that portion of Lots 3 and 4, Block 12, according to the Map of the Town of West Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 13 of Maps, Page 1 and 2, Record of San Bernardino County; which easement is more particularly described as follows: The south twenty (20) feet of said Lots 3 and 4 of said Block 12 of the Town oP West Cucamonga. I i A.7. B S F ~o RA/L ROAD ... ,., e, i ~ .. ~~ 1oO 8 V C Ev ' ~~ r L C. - '~ Ny Li ~. ="~N Vin O Stip` O b ~; V C O ~ A I 1N "1 VI ~~$ I o~ :~ i ~ ~ '~ I .R i ~ tp ~. f ~ I .=.'~ ~~ J I J ~ ~ o '~ ~ ~LJCI1 r~ 1 ~ i a 0497-0"_1 37 MA/ N 5 7REET EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (STORM DRAIN EASEMENT) Assessors Parcel No. 209-085-12 An easement for storm drain purposes along that portion o£ Lots 5 and 6, Block 12, according to the Map of the Town of West Cucamonga, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, Page 1 and 2, Records of San Bernardino County; which easement is more particularly described as follows: The south twenty. (20) feet of said Lots 5 and 6 of said Block 12 of the Town of West Cucamonga. A.L B S.F ~o RA/L ROAD /~o y~' 8 1 I Ig M m~ Op ~. I I a~ ( `L~ I a ' `o ~ ~~ i °~O a xz` 2p`L ~ e> I , ~ :' ~ ~i$ ~. .~ Z ~ ^~ ~:z •2 ~O R. n ~ ~ .J if J i J :: ~'^ ~ C e o . li a:.,7.521 .. 49 I c~ Moggr .7 tan/// Conrulrsnr/Expediter August 21, 1987 Mayor Dennis Stout City of Rancho Cucamonga 9330 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Re: 10th Anniversary Celebration Dennis, As a follow-up to last Wednesday's City Council presentation by the 10th Anniversary Committee I am submitting the following requests: INSURANCE The Committee currently is in negotiations with Barton Development Co. for the use of Barton Plaza II as the site foe the 10th Annive raary Celebration on November 8. Barton has stipulated they want us to provide $1 million in liability insurance for the event. (See enclosed) Would the city be willing to provide liability coverage for the celebration? INVITATIONS S TICKETS Our needs include the following: 5,003 (5,000 to be sent, 1,000 for hand-out) invitations consisting of four (4) pieces; an A-6 mailing envelope, A-5 bcoadfold invitation card, A-2 return envelope, and an A-2 return card. 1,000 printed tickets. DECO RP.TIONS This category is expected to be sponsored, but to be safe we anticipate a possible expense not to exceed $1,000, The price of the dinner ($35) includes food, tables and chairs, dishes and utensils, linens. The caterer will supply the no-host bar, with proceeds going to the 10th Anniversary Committee to offset the expense of the event. ~J`O Ma88r .StQd1l// Conw/nvrt,/Erpr+i~r 10th Anniversary Committee page 2 tPe also feel there is a good chance of finding outside underwriting to assist with the offsetting of event costs. Please feel free to contact me at any time regarding our requests, we would be happy to meet with you at your convenience to answer any questions. The Committee is grateful for your assistance and believes this will be a very special event to celebrate a very special city. Regards, Maggi amm Invitation Chairman 19th Anniversary Committee City of Rancho Cucamonga enc. ysi July 30, 1987 Ma. Liz Gallarini wordsmiths 9521 Huaineae Center Drive, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TEN YEAR ANNIVERSARY EVENT SITE Dear Ma. Gallsrini: Pursuant to your latter dated July 17, 1987, this will confirm my otler of Barton Plaza Ii, 10681 Foothill Blvd., ground floor, as the Bite for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Tsn Yaar Anniversary Gala on November 8, 1967. Should a lease for the ground floor premises be coneumatad prior to your gala, I sill attempt to relocate the function to another location. It will ba necessary !or your insurance carrier to provide, prior to the event, an Insurance certificate evidencing liability insurance with combined single limits of Si nnn npn ~ziry nauui,u uucamonge nu9lneae Park Equities James E. Harton, Daniel Lea Stephenson and Cushman 6 Wakefield o1 California, Inc. as additional insured. In addition we would require that you sign the attached Hold Harmless Agreement. Please coordinate any Bite preparation plans with Susan McNiel aL the Barton Plaza Marketing Ottice at 10535 Foothill Blvd., Suite 128, (714) 989-8420. Wa era ~heppy to support your efforts on behalf o! iha City of Rancho Cucamonga and look forward to a aucceaatul celebration. Cordially, BARYON DEVELOPMENT CAMPANY Jamey E. Ba t President JEH/ke - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ~}~+~.., MEMORANDUM ,:a.' ' August 28, 1987 ,«y ~°l-V T0: y r, City Council, and City Manager ~lJ FROM: art, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: ditional Insured Certificate for 10th Anniversary Gala, at arton Plaza fI I received a request by James Barton to provide an additional insured cer- tificate far SI ,000,000 naming Mr. Barton and his partners on the City's policy for the one night event. I have forwarded a request to the Joint Powers Au tho rf ty, handling our liability coverage, for the certificate. Verbally, I have been told the Ezecu five Board has put a freeze on the issuance of certificates of insurance namfng additional insurers due to excessive requests and some very questionable requests. The Execu tf ve Board feels a clear policy regarding the issu ranee of certificates needs to be developed before any more certificates are issued. Their position is simply to protect the member agencies from needless exposures as we are "pooled" and share the cost of losses. The Executive Committee will be meeting in mid-September to develop their policy, therefore, we may not receive an answer until after that meeting. I iia ve asked ii~e ixecu Live Oi rec Lur iu pu eii Lice iiem i.iiruuyii ii yuaaiuie, iww- ever, there are no guarantees ft wilt pass. In the meantime, I have researched twa alternatives: 1. A separate policy for 51,000,000 for the one night event could be purchased. Mithout testing the market, the insurance broker felt the cost would be between 55,000 and ;10,000. If council would like to pursue this option, action would be neces- sary at a council meeting directing the purchase of this policy. The broker would need 30 days to find an insurer and effect the policy. ys3 Fnge 2 Mayor, City Councfl, and City Manager August 28, 1987 2. The City could assume the entire 51,000,000 risk, in essence, self-insuring the event. Council action would be necessary setting this up for one night. Recommended Handlin Since, I have forwarded a letter requesting issuance of the certi flc ate, I would recommend we wait until we receive an answer from the Joint Powers Au- thority. If a certificate cannot be issued, ! would recommend we assume the risk for the one night and self insure the event. A formal recommendation, if necessary, on the self-insurance will be put on a future council agenda. ]f you have any questions or comments, please contact me or Robert Rizzo. JH/bkt cc: Robert Rizzo 7 S~ CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Manager FROM: City Clerk's Office SUBJECT: REYIEN OF PARK DEY ELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE Staff report for this item Will be handed out under separate cover due to multi-color pages included in this report. /dja 4s 5 DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Mark R. Lorimer, Sr. Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Ambulance Re soonse Time Update As part of the September 16 meeting, the City Council Will consider response time maintained by Mercy Ambulance for the months of July and August. Attached is a letter prepared 6y Ray Mayfield of the Foothill Fire Protection District containing statistics on ambulance response time. Staff will evaluate this data and prav ide a report for inclusion in the Council agenda package. Additionally, this information will be hand delivered to each member of Lhe City Council prior to the September 16 meeting. Thank you for your patience. /ml ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ I ~~~ 9. O, BOX 35 • 6643 AMETHYST ST, • pANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 1714) 987-4535 September 10, 1987 Mark Lorimer City of Rancho Cucamonga P, O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Lorimer: Mercy Ambulance and 2 have devised a system for tracking ambulance response times that will allow the least amount of error possible for reporting. The system was implemented July 1, 1987. Below, as you requested, are the ambulance response times for July and August, 1987. The following response times are broken down by station's first-in district's: TOTAL CODE N CALLS EXCEEDING $ CALLS WITHIN 3 CALLS 10 l4INUTES 10 MINUTES STATION 1 144 7 95.13$ STATION 2 143 7 95.1$ STATION 3 36 5 86.11$ TOTAL 373 19 94.11$ Currently, I am submitting a quarterly report to the Foothill Fire Protection District Hoard of Directors, addressing ambulance response times. The next report will be submitted at the October Aoard meeting. I will fozwa r3 a copy of the report to you ea c'1 quarter. I hope this will satisfy your needs in tra ckinq the -~ ulencF respo.^.~c ~ur~as Lor rile purpose of permit com, Hance. Attached, for your in cormation, is a cop•; of the seccnd yuar±~.cr re s.~onse k.imes fir 19F7. yS7 City of Rancho Cucamonga September 10, 1987 Page Two If I can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to call. Respectively, ~" ~~-~- Ron Mayfield Division Chief RM/ss ys8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~~cnnto STAFF REPORT ~° ~y 2~ .~ z J o` o f'- ~ z UL D 1977 GATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Bevelopment Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: RWA RD OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC SAfETY AND CIVIC CENTER FACILITY PROJECT RECOMMENDATION: Award bid for construction of Public Safety and Civic Center project to Berry Construction in the amount of E17,898,322.00 and award bid for furnishings supplier to Seal Furniture and Systems Inc. in the amount of $1,529,432.00. BAG KGROUN D: On August 31, 1987 the City Clerk conducted the construction bid opening for the Civic Genter and Public Safety facility project. A total of seven bids were submitted by General Contractors, the lowest bid from Berry Construction at $17,898,322. Ir. November 1986 and April 1987 the City conducted bids for the furnishings for the facility. Seal Furniture and Systems Inc, submitted the lowest bid to lac G i i.y. ANALYS iS: Construction: Staff, the Architect and the Resident Inspector for the project have analyzed the bid submittal by Berry Construction. this analysis includes reviewing the Bid submittal to insure its completeness, reference checks on the General Contractor and reference checks on all of the listed subcontractors. Staff has found that the bid submittal by Berry Construction is complete and fulfills the stated requirements in the Notice Inviting Bids. Berry Construction has built similar types of buildings and does possess all of the appropriate licenses and crede nti al5 necessary to construct khis project. Staff's reference chock of the firm shows that *. hey are a highly rated epmpa n'r among boih past and present clients (refer to Attachment A -List of Reference Resources). Staff and the Architect have cond uctecf reference checks and reviews of all the subcontractors' credentials to insure that all have the proper ~o rk experience and qualifications necessary to do the project. In conducting this comparison, staff determined that two of the su6co ntrac to rs listed, the structural steel and the pre-cast concrete, did not have the exact teclin ical y~ 9 City Staff Report September 16, 1987 AWARD OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY 3 CIVIC CENTER FAC[L ITY PROJECY Page 2 credentials listed in the Specifications. Staff was able to obtain information from the subcontractors showing that they did have equivalent qualifications and credentials to those listed in the Specifications. The equivalent credentials and qualifications for the two subcontractors are acceptable to the City Attorney, the Building and Safety Division and the Architect. Based on the review of references, qualifications, licenses, and similar work experience of all those firms included in the lowest bid, Berry Construction is the qualified bidder for the project. Fu rnishin s Su tier: Staff and the Interior Design consultant have reviewed the bi s su m tied by Seal Furniture and Systems, Inc, to insure compliance with the specifications and needs outlined by the City. Seal has met the furnishings needs and detailed requirements of the Lity through the use of the Steelcase product lines. Both Seal and the product manufacturer, Steelcase, have the necessary qualifications to complete a jab bid of this size. References of both firms show that they are highly respected in the office product industry. SUMMARY: It is important to note that the majority of the work necessary for t-completion of the Public Safety and Civic Center facility is included in these two bids. There is some work that has been specifically excluded from the Contract Documents and Specifications because of the added savings that ..i ti ;: 1 (cGcirc ~y JouL uy Ji, e~Liy wiLi~ file mmwiec iu rer and dealer ror the products. These items include the window coverings, special cabinet work (i.e., postal counter, evidence lockers) and certain audio visual equipment for the Council Chambers. The contingencies for the project, identified in the financing program which is also being reviewed on this agenda, include staff's estimate of what these remaining items will cost. As bids are submitted to the City for the specific items, staff will schedule them for review by the City Council for approval. Re et#fully submitted, - yam, Community Development Director JL:I.D:kap Attachments: Exhibit A y6 D EXHIBIT A SOURCE OF REFERENCES FOR BERRY CONSTRUCTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY/CIVIC CENTER BID Mr. John Giblin/ San Bernardino County Mr. Larry Holff/ Nolff, Lang, Christopher, Architects Mr. Martin Pastucha/ Upland Police Mr. Herman Rempel/ Barton Construction Mr. Lloyd Michael/ Cucamonga County Hater District Chief Lewis/ Rialto Fire Department Mr. Art Campo/.Chief Building Official for City of Upland Mr. Floyd Stork/ Nolff, Lang, Christopher, Architects Mr. Tom De Minico/ Resident Inspector for the project yG/ v nn n • ~.n rrn nrrn ~ ernwrn w STAFF REPORT ~~° °9.° a pj}) s 0 ~ ~ 9 --19i7 DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Memhers of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: SELECTION OF RI LIZARD MILLS AND ASSOCIATES TO CONDUCT NEEDED SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING IN CONNECTION WITH THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND CIVIC CENTER FACILITY PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO EXECUTE CONTRRCT RECOMMENDATION: Select Richard Mills and Associates to conduct thethe testing fofor soils and materials as specified in the Contract Documents for the Public Safety and Civic Center Facility project. BACKGROUND: As part of the development and construction of the Pu b~ic Safety and Civic Center facility it is necessary for the City to retain the services of a firm which provides inspection services for soils and materials. The firm that is selected will test the soil and materials used in the project to insure that t hav are of the H: ..M.• -` duJ weeL LIIB regUl remenCS }er the ~,....,, qu.., tr type of construction. [n August staff sent a Reque s: for Qualifications to firms in the Southern California area that perform these types of services. RNALYSIS: Staff has concluded interviews with ten firms that perform the needed testing of soils and materials. Based on these interviews, staff is recommending that Richard Mills and Associates be selected as the soils and materials testing firm for the project. Richard Mi11s and Associates possess the qualifications and experience necessary for the Public Safety and Civic Center project. It is necessary to have a testing firm en board immediately in order for the General Contractor to begin construction of the project. Because much of the testing work will depend on the construction schedule of the General Contractor (i .e., number of concrete pours, estimated days of steel fabrication, schedule of excavation), it is not possible to negotiate a lump sum ^.o nt ract y 6 ~- City Staff Report September 16. 1987 SELECTION OF RICHARD MILLS & ASSOC./SOILS & MATERIALS TESTING/CIVIC CENTER 6 PNBLIC SAFETY FACILITY PROJECT Page 2 at this time. Once a construction schedule is prepared by the General Contractor, a lump sum proposal will be submitted to the City. Until that time, Mills will work on a time and charges basis as outiined Tn their attached proposal. It is expected that a lump sum contract will be available 6y mid October. Re pectful y ubmitted, ... . Jack Lam, AICP Community Development Director JL:LD:kap Attachments: Proposal U(o3 SCHEDULE OF FEES AUGUST 1,1987 I LABORATORY TESTING SOILS TEST UNIT COST Consolidation $ 70.00 Expansion Index (UBC Standard 29-2) 70.00 Direct Shear 80.00 Atterberg Limits 55.00 R-Value 175.00 Sand Equivalent 30.00 Mechanical Sieve Analysis 52.00 Hydrometer Analysis 40.00 Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture 60.00 Specific Gravity 40.00 Lab noisture Determinations 8.00 Unconfined Compression Test 50.00 Lab Density Determinations (Drive Tube) 10.OU California Bearing Ratio (Corps of Engineers Method) 330.00 Agricultural Suitability Set 70.00 Cocrosivity 35.00 Sodium Sulfate 15.00 CONCRETE MORTAR GROU TEST UNIT COST Concrete Cylinder Compression Tests 5 15.00 Hold Cylinders (Not Tested) 5.00 Cylinder Molds - 6" x 12" (NO Charge if Tested) 1.50 Splitting Tensile Tests 25.00 insulating Concrete Cylinders - Compression Tests 15.00 insulating Concrete Cylinders - Constant Weight 15.00 Gunite Compression Tests 15.00 Concrete Flexural Strength 40.00 Unit weight of cylinders 15.00 Concrete Modulus of Elasticity 35.00 Compression tests on cores - 8" maximum diameter 15.00 RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES, INC. 9624 TURNER AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 989-1751 PROPOSAL FOR MATERIALS AND SOILS TESTING CIVIC CENTER AND PUBLIC SAFBTY FACILITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA £o[ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. 00R 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 51730 V/p Sr RICL!ARC f~!ILLS :,SSMC'; _T~_ RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES v62~ iuEmr Menus . ROncno CUCOmong4 CdWmb V17J0 . n+~> Po0.175+ August 24, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Attention: Linda Daniels Reference: Contract Documents Prepared by John Warnecke and Associates dated July 1967 Subject: Proposal for Materials and Soils Testing Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center and Public Safety Facility Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Gentlemen: Ln response to your request of August 14, 1987, we propose to provide materials and soils testing services fox the subject project. Per instructions as regards a telephone conversation with Richard Young, Project Architect, on August ~a. t9A7. our undecstandina is that the quantities of testing and inspection are unknown at this time and therefore, we propose that charges for these services be on an hourly or test rate basis in accordance to the Cates shown on the attached FEE SCHEDULE. Richard Mills Associates has been involved in similar projects for construction inspection and testing as specified in the referenced contract document since 1962. Ouc staff consists of registered civil engineers licensed in the State of California, deputy construction inspectors licensed in the Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties and experienced laboratory technicians. Information on the qualifications and experience of Richard Mills Associates is attached as appendix "A". Our services will consist of (1) Observing rough grading ope cations, performing soil tests, and submittal of a soils grading report. Our representative will observe clearing of the site and rough grading operations on a periodic basis, Water consent, in place density (compaction, maximum density - optimum GFOIOGY fOUNDetlON fNGMEFRMG iF~ONG y6 ~ moisture, and other soil tests, as required, will be performed at a frequency and at locations selected by the soils engineer. During the course of construction we will notify the owner in writing, with copy to the contractor if, at any time in our opinion, the work is not in conformity to the plans and specifications. Upon completion of the work we will prepare a final report for the owner which will summarize our observations and the results of all tests performed. The final report will contain recammendationa and opinions regarding the conformance of [he completed cough grading to the intent o£ the plans, soil engineering reports, and specifications. (2) Compaction testing of onsi to utility trench backfill and onsite street improvements. Services will consist of performing in place density tests (compaction tests), water content tests, and maximum density - optimum moisture tests at random locations and a frequency selected by our firm. Observation of compaction methods used by the contractor is not included in the scope of our work. A written report summarizing the results of all tests performed will be prepared upon completion of the work. The report will not be a certificate, or warranty, of the compaction of the materials tested. (3) Material testing of asphaltic pavement. Services will include gradation, extraction, and density tests of asphaltic pavement. Test will be performed on materials sampled at random locations at frequencies based on job specification section 02513. (4) Inspection of concrete, iignc weight concrete avu cellular concrete on a continuous basis during the placement of concrete for conformance to approved plans and specifications. During tha concrete placement the inspector will fabricate compression test specimens and prrform necessary tests for conformance to job specifications. (5) Inspection of reinforcing steel for conformance to approved plans and specifications. This inspection is performed prior to the clearing of forms or delivering of concrete to the job site. (61 Inspection of masonry construction, on a continuous basis du r'_ng the construction of masonry where special inspection is required. The inspector will observe the placement of block, reinforcement placement, the mixing and placement of mortar and grout. The inspector will Fabricate test specimens for mortar and grout in accordance to the approved specifications. 17) Inspection of welding procedures (shop and field) and completed welds for conformance to approved plans and y67 r-.ic~nr-o :+~~u ~..--~~..rr-: specifications. Thie inspection is on a continuous basis during all structural welding. The inspector will use ultra sonic equipment when required and may use dye penetrants to detect surface diecontinui ties. (8) Inspection of high strength bolts for conformance to approved plans and specifications. (9) Inspection of metal decking on a continuous basis during installation for compliance to approved plans and specifications. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We look forward to working with you on this project, and if we ace selected to perform these services we, shall put forth our best professional effort to see that the field work and written [eports ace performed in a timely manner upon receipt of your notice to proceed. If you have any questions regarding this proposal please contact the undersigned Project Manager. Very Truly You[s, RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES Gre ~h ~ ~ E. Proje~i anager E. Duane Lyon, P.E. President CONCRETE MORTAR, GROU continue TEST UNIT COST Mix Designs-Cowplete (Includes Analysis of Aggregates) Quote Mix Design - Calculations Only 55.00 Mix Design - Lightweight Quote Trial Batch in Laboratory Quote Concrete Shrinkage Test - (Set of 3) 165.00 Coring - 2", 4" and 6" in Diameter T t i Quote 00 35 on es Block Compress Block, 24 hr. Absorption (Min. Req. of 5) . 50.00 Block, Moisture Content 15.00 Block, Lineal Shrinkage - Rapid Method 40.00 Block, Conformance to ASTM C90 (set of 3) 275.00 Brick, Compression 15.00 Brick, 24 hr. Absorption 15.00 Brick, 5 hr. Boil 15.00 Brlck, Modulus of Rupture 15.00 Mortar Compression Test - (2" x 4" Cylinder) 15.00 Grout Compression Teat - (3" x 6" Priem) 15.00 Masonry Cores, Compression, B" Max. Diamete[ 15.00 Masonry Cores, Shear, 8" Max. Diemater 30.00 Tensile Test - C.M.A. Method 30.00 Trimming of Test Specimens 15.00 STRUCTURAL STEEL TEST UNIT COST Tension $ 18.00 Bend Test 10.00 Machining Coupons for Structural - Tensile and Bend 25.00 REINFORCING STEEL Tension - No. 11 or smaller 18.00 Tension - No. 14 25.00 Tension - No. 18 35.00 Band Test 18.00 y~a 9 RICNARC " ~i_lS .=3S.~S~T~: AGGREGATE TEST UNIT COST Absorpty.on $ 35.00 Cleaness Value - Fine or Coarse 35.00 Decantation - No. 200 17.50 Deleterious Substances Dete[minati on 50.00 Durability Test - Fine or Coecse 50.00 Finene 68 Modulus 50.00 Plat and Elongated Pieces - (per Sixe Fraction) 20.00 Fractured Faces - (Per Size Fraction) 20.00 Light Weight Particles 20.00 L06 Angeles Rattle[ 60.00 Moisture Content 5.00 Organic impurities 35.00 Percent Clay in Sands by Hydromete[ 35.00 Percent Shale 35.00 Potential Reactivity - Chemical Method 100.00 Sand Equivalent 30.00 Sieve Analysis - Fine or Coa[se 52.00 Sieve Analysis - Pit Run 52.00 Soft Particles 15.00 Soundness of Sodium Sulfate 125.00 Specific Gravity - Fine or Coarse 40.00 Weight per Cubic Fcot 35.00 ASPHALT TEST UNJT COST Coring $ Quote Mix Design (Marshall or Hveem) Quote Pavement Evaluation Quote Deflection Study (Benklemen Beam) Quote Film Stripping 35.00 Rc Factor 35.00 Rf Factor 55.00 Moisture, Vapor Susceptibility 125.00 Extraction - Percent Asphalt 70.00 Extraction - Percent Asphalt and Gradation 100.00 Stability Tests iHVeem) Set of 3 125.00 Bulk Specific Gravity (Compacted Mix) 30.00 Y 7Q R~C~AP~~ ''iLLS ASSC':!~~TC" II PERSONAL SERVICES INSPECTOR - TECNNICIAN SERVICE SOURLY RATE Special Inspector - Asphalt Pavinq Laydown $ 39.00 Special Inspector - Asphalt Plant 39.00 Special Inspectoz - Caissons 39.00 Special inspector - Concrete Batch Plant 39.00 Special inspector - Concrete Placement 39.00 Special Inspector - Concrete ere-Stress 39.00 Special Inspector - Gunite Placement 39.00 Special Inspector - Ri Tensile Bolts 39.00 Special Inspector - masonry 39.00 Special Inspector - Pilinq 39.00 Special Inspector - Metal Decking 39.00 Special Inspector - Reinforcing Steel 39.00 Special Inspector - Structural Steel Fabrication 39.00 Special Inspector - Welding (ultrasonic) 45.00 Special inspector - Welding (Visual) 39.00 Anchors - Pull Tes ts 39.00 Coring (Includes 1 Technician) 55.00 Pickup and Deliver y of Concrete Test Cylinders 20.00 samplin g 39.00 Soils Technician, Field 39.00 Soils Technician, Lab 39.00 Seri ss C oncrete Nammer Testing 39.00 ENGINEERING - OFFICE PERSONNEL ROURLY RATE Draftsman $ 41.00 Staff Engineer 60.00 Project Engines[ 65.00 Principal Civil Engineer 75.00 Staff Geologist 60.00 Project Geologist 65.00 Principal Geologist 75.00 Secretarial 24.00 Data Entry 22.00 y 7/ RICV=.=~~C `''_LS -"~r Dlr. r:.. NISCBLLANEODS RATES SERVICE RATE Overtime - Over 8 hours $ 10.00/hour Subsistence - Per Diem Quote Travel Time - Hourly 20.00/hour Mobile Laboratory and Testing Equipment 200.00/week These overtime rates are to be added to the standard hourly rate for the appropriate personnel charges. Our laboratory complies with the requirements for laboratory facilities detailed in ASTN E329 and is inspected biannually by the Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory of the National euceau of Standards. All tests are performed under the supervision of a Registered Civil Engineer. ~~~-' BICN4RD MILLS ~•`:3C' '- ~. APPENDIX A RICHARD MILLS ASSOCIATES FIAM INFORMATION Richard Mills Associates has been continuously engaged in the practice of Geotechnical Engineering, Construction Inspection and Material Testing in the San Bernardino County area since 1962. Ovr staff includes both Registered Civil Engineers and Registered Geologists, as well as qualified technicians and inspectors. Our laboratory and radio dispatched field vehicles are equipped to perform all of the tests indicated in the proposed scope of work. Our firm is approved as a soils and/or physical testing agency by the Federal Aviation Administration, National Bureau of Standards, State of California Office of Architecture, Department of the Navy Western Division, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Ouc laboratory complies with the requirements for laboratory facilities detailed in ASTM E329. Our laboratory is inspected biannually by the Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory and the AAEHTO Materials Reference Laboratory of the National Bureau of Standards. we participate in the reference sample program of the Bureau. Our experience includes performing soil engineering materials testing, and inspection services on over 6,500 projects, the majority of these have been in the western San Bernardino County area. The following individuals may be contacted as references: Dale Elein - Claremont Colleges ~/19) b1L-tlUbL Charles Jones - City of Ontario, Engineering Dept. (714) 986-1151 Jerry Bryant - Lewis Homes of California (714) 985-0971 Bob Wilkinson - County of San Bernardino, Architect Division (714) 387-4246 Roger A. Johnson - City of Upland, Engineering Dept. (714) 982-1352 our firm has 32 employees including 1 :egistered engineering yeoloyist, 2 registered civil engineers, 1 graduate soil scientist, 2 graduate civil engineers, 16 field soil technician - construction inspectors, 3 laboratory materials testing technicians, and an administrative staff of 7. A resume of the firms professional associates and typical project-client list follows. y73 r.,cunrz~ i ~~i is ,,r..^~ . . PRINCIPALS E. DUANB LYON president B.S. in Civil Engineering from the California State Polytechnic University. Registered Civil Engineer: California and Arizona Registered Construction Inspector: California Professional Membership: American society of Civil Engineers Soils and Foundation engineers Association American Concrete Institute American Society for Testing and Raterials Joined the firs in 1964, end has been in responsible charge of soils engineering and materials testing for the firm since 1974. Before assuming hie current position with the firm, he was in charge of the firm's testing laboratory for a period of 7 years. Prior to joining the £irm, he ass employed by a private consultant in Walnut Creek, California for 3 years and by the State of California-Division of Righways for 5 years where he performed inspection and materials testing on freeway projects. ee has lectured at California State Polytechnic University on a part time basis. ~~~/ ~~% fdCUA?D MILLS A~Ga,~T~' ASSOCIATfiS GREG R. CHANDRA B.S. in Civil Engineering from California State Polytechnic University Registered Civil Engineer: California Professional Membership: American Society o£ Civil Engineers .joined the firm in 1978 and is currently in charge o£ the Eirm's soil and materials testing laboratory. Prior to assuming his present duties, he performed soil engineering investigations for a period of two years and laboratory testing of soil, Portland cement concrete, reinforcing steel, and asphaltic concrete for two years. y1's RICNARDMILLS;.SSC;CI.>TES TYPICAL PROJECTS MATERIALS TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION - STRUCTURES PROJECT CLIENT Foothill Law and Justice Center County of San Bernardino Rancho Cucamonga 6 Story Commercial Building Hassan Development Co. Eastland Shopping Center, West Covina 6 Story Commercial Building Sheldon Pollock 5th Street, Santa Monica S Story Dormitory Claremont Colleges 6th Street, Claremont ' 5 Story Commercial Building Lesney Development Co. Warden Ave., Whiner Fluor Aircraft Eangec Fluor Company Ontario International Airport Lockheed Aircraft Mangers Lockheed Aircraft Co. Burbank Airport General Dynamics Plant General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga Indian Hill Mell o.. Strauss Construction Co. Red Lion Inn Red Lion Inn Ontario Nigh School t6 Chaffey High School Dist. Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga .junior Migh School Cucamonga School Dist. Rancho Cucamonga City Hall City of Upland Upland Police Building City o£ Ontario Ontario inland Container corp. Rust International Paper Mill, Ontario eolice Building City of Upland Upland y~p RICI-IARD MILLS ,=SoC CI,~TES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, RICP, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: CITY/AGENCY AGREEMENT REGARDING SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND CIVIC F CILITY The attached Agreement between the City and Redevelopment Agency formalizes the financing arrangements between the City and Redevelopment Agency for the construction of the Public Safety and Civic facility. The provisions of the Agreement are consistent with the planned financing program conceptually established upon the Redevelopment Agency's sale of Tax Allocation Bonds in 1986. The arrangements can be summarized as follows: 1. The City becomes responsible far the following: A. The Public Safety building and secured parking structure B. Onsi to and Offsi to improvements ~. ProJect conttngenctes related to the above 2. The RDA becomes responsible for the following: A. The Civic Center building and meeting chambers B. Furnishings, fixtures and equipment related to the facility C. Project contingencies related to the above 3. Financiny will be as follows: (See attached financing program) A. Redevelopment Agency contributions to came from the proceeds of the 1986 Tax Allocation Bonds B. City's obligations to come from a "down payment" from a portion of the Civic Center fund and remainder from an interest free loan from the Redevelopment Agency. C. Please note Chat all furnishings, fixtures, and a°ui pment will be paid for entirely through the earned interest on the 198fi Tax Rllocation bonds. v» City Council Staff Report Subject: Sources of Funding September 16, 1987 Page 2 4. City will allow the Redevelopment Agency to utilize the facilities at no cost upon completion of the project. As originally conceived, the financing program enabled the City's annual financial obligations to not exceed the total annual cost which the City would pay for its rental space at the time of project completion. Because the bids have been so favorable, the Cit 's annual oblf ation for its oarticioation will be less that it current v oavs or a its RECOMMENDATION: Approve the City/Rgency Agreement and Finance Plan. Respectfully omitted, ~-^~ Jack Lam, AI Director of Community Developmen£""" ~~ JL/jr Attachment v~~ CIVIC CENTER/PUBLIC SAFETY PROJECT FINANCING PROGRAM A. CITY PORTION OF CIVIC CENTER/PUBLIC SAFETY PROJECT: NOTE: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NO INTEREST LOAN TO THE CITY PAYMENTS TO BEGIN UPON OCCUPANCY PUBLIC SAFETY b PARKING STRUCTURE $ 5,000,000 ONSITES/OFFSITES $ 1,100,000 PROJECT CONTINGENCIES (10% AND WORK NOT PRESENTLY INCLUDED ON BIDS) $ 690,000 SUBTOTAL $ 6,190,000 MINUS DOWNPAYMENT CIVIC CENTER FACILITY FUND $ 2,500,000 SUBTOTAL $ 4,290,000 ANNUAL PAYMENT/20 YR. NO INTEREST LOAN PAYMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $ 214,500 ~. ,.ten ~w.~1Gii Di ~iii~ eiiilEnj ~uoLib JAI EI ~1 YHL1L111: CIVIC CENTER BUILDING $11,800,000 FURNISHINGS* $ 1,529,432 PROJECT CONTINGENCIES (10% AND WORK NOT PRESENTLY INCLUOEO ON BIDS) $ 1,552,943 SUBTOTAL $14,882,315 *A11 furnishings costs to be paid through interest earned on 1986 Tax Allocation Bn nd Issue. y79 Redevelopsent Agency Agenda Septgber 16, 1987 PAGE A. CALL TO 6RDER 1. Roll Call: Braun Buquet _. Stwt ~ end Ntight _. Ring _, B. CONSENT CALENDAR The follwing Conagt Calendar itga are expected to be routine end non-contrweraial. lbey rill be acted upon by iha RDA et one rile ri[hout diacuuion. Any itq aay be zswad by en Agaacyagber or aches of the audience for discveaion. 1. Approval for the Chainan to azecuta a contract (CO RA 1 87-020) rith GRC, Inc. to act a Acquisition Aggt in the acquisiilao of alas for fire protection facilitiaa. 2. Approval of City/Agency/Co~mty asormdm of 10 undaretaadiag regarding the cal ovation and developagt of the County psrtrial datentioa facility. NONE SUBMITTED. The Rancho Cnesaoga 8adasalopaamt Agaaey Ilaating rill racaw to rrvarsaea at tM tdr of conaidacatioa of eM Clq IYngrr's 8tatt RaporL by the Clty Cagcil. D. STAPP REPORTS 1. AFYROVAL OF AGRB'BNBNT BY AND HBIWEBN THE CITY OP RANCHO 15 CUCAMONGA AND Tfffi RANCHO CDCAMONCA RED698<.OPMENT AGENCY j - eetabl iahing aourca^ of fwda to be paid for the I 3¢v¢lopmaat of the Public Snfeq end Civic Facility. i ~r .~•, .) Redevelopment Agency Agenda Sep ember 16, 1987 PAGE B. CONNUNICATZON3 PAON TH8 PUBLIC Thin is the tine snd place for the geaerai public to addreaa the Radavelopmmt Agency. State lar pro616ita the Agency from addrnaing any iaaue not praviowly included on ehs Agenda. '!ha Agency nay receive teatimoay and set the natter For a aubaegwnt testing. Couante are to be limited to five miautea per individwl. P. AD.TOURNNSNT i . ~ i . t~yJ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONi REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT September 16, 1987 Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP Deputy Executive Director BY: Oler, Jones, Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: Authorization for the Chairman to execute a contract with GRC, Inc to act as Acquisition Agent for the acquisition of sites for fire protection facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairman [o execute a contract with GRC, Inc to act as Acquisition Agent for the acquisition of sites for fire protection facilities. BACKGROUND: In April, 1987, the Agency approved a Master Plan for the development of Fire Protection Facilities, which outlined the needed facilities and set a schedule for the acquisition and construction of [hose facilities. Recognizing that the land prices would continue to escalate, the Agency set as a priority the acquisition of the land necessary for all the facilities. Agency Counsel, Best, Best 6 Krieger, was handling the transactions for the Agency. ANALYSIS: With the resignation of Hest, Best 6 Krieger, the Agency is unable to proceed with the acquisitions. In order to continue the acquisition process and ensure that the Agency is able to obtain commitments for the needed sites, it is necessary ko obtain the services of an Acquisition Agent. This agent will negotiate with the land owners on behalf of the Agency, open the escrows, obtain all necessary title reports and appraisals, and perform other related duties as required. GRC, Inc has agreed to provide these services at a cost not to exceed $4,500.00 for all three sites. GRC, Inc is the Eirm which assisted the Agency with the preparation of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. I. Although a different division of the Eirm will be providing these services, staff is confident that these will be handled in the same professional manner as the Plan Amendment. The firm is experienced as acquisition agent to other redevelopment agencies. Re pec~jf'u ly Submitted, YI,I//It dl~n l ~p ~i~-t~ t ~„_.......r ,7a ck Lam, AICP ~ ~~~ De pu[y Executive Director WI ~1- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1987, between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, a body corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as "Agency"), and GRC, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). A. Recitals (1) Agency has need of professional services with respect to the acquisition of land fvr the construction of three (3) fire protection facilities. (2) Consultant has submitted a proposal for the performance of such services. (3) Agency desires to retain Consultant to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to Agency, Agency board, and staff in the acquisition of the property. (4) Consultant represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between Agency and Consultant as follows: B. Agreement 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Project: The acquisition of properties described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and written, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to Agency as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by Agency with respect to the Project. (b; services: S::ch professional services as are necessary to be performed by Consultant in order to complete the Project. ~ 1 (c) Com of etion of Project: The date of completion of a 1 phases of the Project, including any and all proceduces, maps, surveys, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations, and attendance by Consultant at public hearings regarding the acquisition of the land identified in Exhibi[ "A", attached hereto. Consultant aorees as follows: (a) Consultant shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto, and all in accordance with Federal, State, and City statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of the Agency. (b) Consultant shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibits "A" and "H" to Agency within the time specified in Exhibit "A". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A". Agency may thereafter review and forward co Consultant comments regarding said documents and Consultant shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. Agency shall receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by the Agency. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section B2.(b) may be extended upon written approval cif Agency. !~; Currs ultant shall, at Consultant`s sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of Consultant, be necessary to comply with the terms of [his Agreement. In the event that any such other persons are retained by Consultant, Consultant hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform such secvices required hereunder. Consultant further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by Consultant except upon the prior written approval of [he Agency. -3~ Agency agrees as follows: (a) To pay Consultant a maximum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4,500.00) for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct or indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to Consultant. Payment to Consultant shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth below. (b) Payments to Consultant shall be made by Agency in accordance with the invoices submitted by Consultant, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable amount of time after said invoices are received by Agency. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed Four Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars ($4,275.00). (c) Consultant agrees that, in no event, shall Agency be required to pay to Consultant any sum in excess of Four Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars ($4,275.00) prior to receipt 6y Agency of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein, in acceptable form and content to Agency. Final payment shall be made not later than Sixty (60) days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by Agency. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional secvrces requested in wrrtrng Dy Agency, and no[ included in Exhibit "B" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "B". CHarges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by Agency within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by Agency. Agency agrees to Provide Consultant: (a) Information and assistance as necessary. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which Consultant - ciders necessary in order to complete the Project. (c) Such information as is generally available from Agency files applicable to the Project. ~µ ~ (d) Assistance, if necessary from other governmental parties. However, it responsibility to make respect to the gathering in obtaining information agencies and/or private shall be Consultant's all initial contact with of such information. Ownership of documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of the Agency and, upon payment for services performed by Consultant, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to Agency by Consultant. Consultant may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as Consultant may desire. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by Agency upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to~Consultant at least Fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated, Consultant shall be compensated at Consultant's applicable hourly rates, as set forth in Exhibit "B", on a pro rata basis with respect to the percentage of the Project completed as of the date of terminaticn. In no event, however, shall Consultant receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a), above. Consultant shall provide to Agency any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared 6y Consultant as of the date of termination. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below-named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible Eor the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Olen Jones Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Steve Copenhaver GRC, Inc 150 W. First St, Suite 280 Claremont, CA 91711-4139 ~~ Insurance: Consultant shall neither commence work un e~3 r this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to Agency nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. Consultant shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the Following policies of insurance: (a) Wockers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, Consultant shall furnish to Agency a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Consultant shall, prior to commencing work, sign and file with Agency a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Cali f.or nia Labor Code Section 3700 which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of this Agreement." (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, ai Consultant's sole cost ans expense, Consultant shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of the Agency and COnsultant, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from Consultant's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or Eor any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) Eor property damage. . ~~ (c) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance require y express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against Agency and Agency's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2)~the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by Agency; and (3) they may not be canceled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days notice by insurer to Agency by certified mail. Consultant shall furnish Agency with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing insurance. Consultant may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify an saw ve harmless Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by Consultant of any and all legal costs and attorney's fees, in any manner arising out of or incidental to the performance by Consultant of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either whole or in part, by Consultant without the prior written consent of Agency. 1 11. Damages: In the event that Consultant fails to submit to Agency the completed project, together with all documents and supplemental material required hereunder, in public hearing form, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Agency, within the time set forth herein, or as may be extended by written consent of the parties hereto, Consultant shall pay to the Agency as liquidated damages an amount equal to any and all amounts paid by Agency to Consultant under the terms of this Agreement, which sum represents a reasonable endeavor by the parties hereto to estimate a fair compensation for the foreseeable losses that might result from such a default in performance by Consultant, and due to the difficulty which would otherwise occur in establishing actual damages resulting from such default, unless said default is caused by Agency, er by acts op God, acts of the public enemy, fire, flood, epidemic, or quarantine restrictions. 12. Inde endent Contractor: The patties hereto agree that Consultant an its employees, officers, and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of the Agency. 13. Governrn Law: This Agreement shall be governed by an construe in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 14. Attorneys' Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is institut-~to enforce any term or provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and court costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 15. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any ocher agreement, statement, oc promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing, signed by all parties. ~~_ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the pacties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year set forth above: CONSULTANT AGENCY Chairman ATTEST: City Clerk ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 TD: Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Deputy Director SUBJECT: CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNOE RSTANDING REGARDING COUNTY PRE-TRIAL OETE NTION FACILITY The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) attached to this staff report represents all the points of discussion between the City, Agency, and County regarding Lhe relocation of the County pre-trial detention center from the Law and Justice Center site to one at the southeast corner of the City. This Memorandum of Understanding memorializes the points of understanding between the City, County and the Agency, and is consistent with City/Agency policy direction. RECOMMENDATION: gpprove the Memorandum of Understanding. pectfull,~Jsuhmitted, ~~, Deputy Director JL/jr Attachment MEMOKANDUM OF UNDEKSTANUING FOK CONSTRUCTION OF REGIONAL PRE-TKIAL DETENTION FACILITY PUBLIC IMPKOVEMENTS BETWEEN9'HE COUNTYOF SAN BEKNAKUINO,THERANCHOCUCAMONGA KF,'DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ARTICLE 1 PARTIES AND DATES This Agreement entered into in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, this day of September 198?, between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"), and the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body 1"Agency"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City"). AKTICLF. 11 KECITALS Section;;,l Agency is presently undertaking a program under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seg•)• for the redevelopment, replanning and redesign of certain noncontiguous and blighted areas within the City with stagnant, improperly utilized and unproductive land known as the Rancho Kedevelopment Project ("Project")and requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and general welfare of people of the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Ordinance No. 166 adopted by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on December 23, 1981, as emended, which authorizes the redevelopmentofan area within the tern Wrial limits of the City by the Agency. -i1- 'AII subsequent rel'crences, unless otherwise noted, are to the California health and Safety rode. Section 2.2 County, Agency, and City have previously entered into an agreement on February 21, 1982, entitled "Agreement Regarding Rancho Redevelopment Project Area (Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency)", and certain amendments thereto (the "Agreement"), pursuant to Sections 33401 and 33445. The purpose of the Agreement is to assist in the financing of certain regional facilities which Agency and City have found to 6e of primary benefit to the Project and for which there is no other reasonable means of financing. Section 2.3 County, Agency, and City pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Agreement, as amended, wish to provide for certain reimbursements to County in order to facilitate redevelopment within City and to further provide for the cooperation of County and Agency in carrying out redevelopment activities by financing the construction of certain public improvements appurtenant to and of benefit to County's pre-trial detention facility to be located in Che vicinity of the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Fourth Street. Section 2.4 Agency has found and determined that it would 6e appropriate to pay money Gi the County which shall be used For Che construction of public improvements which are regional facilities and of primary benefit to the Project and by otherwise assisting in the financing of County's pre-trial detention facility. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Che foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: AR'I'ICLR Ill AGENCY REID113URSEMSNTOF000NTY Section 3.1 Pursuant to Section 4.1 ~f this Agreement, and this Memorandum of Understanding, Agency shall provide sufficient funds to reimburse County to enable County to construct and install ofToite water, waste-water, gas, telephone, electrical ,and cable T~' improvements necessary W operate and maintain County's pr^-trial detention (ecility, provided such reimbursement shall not exceed $1,000,0001One Million Dollars 1. _12_ County shell submit invoices to Agency For expenditures subject to reimbursement and Agency shall reimburse County for such expenditures within sixty (60) days thereafter. Section 3.2 City shall have the right to exercise preliminary site development review of the pre-trial detention facility as such review relates to and concerns the integration of public improvements so as to insure public safety and access. City's Planning Commission shall also have the right to informally review County's site deve[opmen[ master plan and building designs for such facility in a manner consistent with such body's review of County's law and justice center. County shall cooperate with and assist in such review process. AH'I'IC1,6 IV 'I`I; Ft M This Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective upon execution by al! parties. All rights and obligations under the terms and conditions oFthis Memorandum of Understanding shall terminate in the event the Agency's right to claim and receive tax increment nnrauao~ n. Ro..~t.... vnaoni~.~.._.. _.. -13 - CITY ON RANCHO CUCAMONGA ayor A'I"t'EST: ,ty er RANCHOCUCAMONGA REDEVEI.OPMENTAGF.NCY Date airman A'1"1'EST: APPROVED ASTO FORM: ecretary au oil n Deputy C inty Counsel ~-(,N MAn .T ~~ ~7 b ~"- Uate COUNTY OF SAN HERNARUINO airman Hoard of Supervisors A7"1'F;ST: er --,~.~-- CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMOP REDEVELOPMENT AGENC' STAFF REPORT DATE: September 16, 1987 T0: Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: ,lack Lam, AICP, Deputy Director SUBJECT: CITY/AGENCY AGREEMENT REGARDING SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR PUBLI Y D C V L F CIL TY The attached Agreement between the City and Redevelopment Agency formalizes the financing arrangements between the City and Redevelopment ggency for the construction of the Public Safety and Civic facility. The provisions of the Agreement are consistent with the planned financing program conceptually established upon the Redevelopment Agency's sale of Tax Rllocation Bonds in 1986. The arrangements can be summarized as follows: 1. The City becomes responsible for the following: A. The Public Safety building and secured parking structure 8. Onsite and Offsite improvements C. Project contingencies related to the above 2. The ROA becomes responsible for the following: A. The Civic Center building and meeting chambers B. Furnishings, fixtures and equipment related to the facility C. Project contingencies related to the above 3. Financing will be as follows: (See attached financing program) A. Redevelopment Agency contributions to come from the proceeds of the 1986 Tax Allocation Bonds ~~~ Redevelopment Agency Staff Report Subject: Sources of Funding September 16, 1987 Page 2 B. City's obligations to come from a "down payment" from a portion of the Livic Center fund and remainder from an interest free loan from the Redevelopment Agency. C. Please note that all furnishings, fixtures, and equipment will be paid for entirely through the earned interest on the 1986 Tax Allocation bonds. 4. City will allow the Redevelopment Agency to utilize the facilities at no cost upon completion of the project. As originally conceived, the financing program enabled the City's annual financial obligations to not exceed the total annual cost which the City would pay for its rental space at the time of project completion. Because the bids have been so favorable, the City's annual obligatfon Approve the City/Agency Agreement and Finance Plan. Respectfully bmitted, ~, ~r~,i~ ,~.f~ ~~ r-"-'Jack Lam, AI CF~' ~ ~"'"- oeputy Birector JL/jr Attachment .~ ~~ CIVIC CENTER/PUBLIC SAFETY PROJECT FINANCING PROGRAM A. CITY PORTION OF CIVIC CENTER/PUBLIC SAFETY PROJECT: NOTE: REOEV ELOPMENT AGENCY NO INTEREST LOAN TO THE CITY PAYMENTS TO BEGIN UPON OCCUPANCY PUBLIC SAFETY b PARKING STRUCTURE f 5,000,000 ONSITES/OFFSITES E 1,100,000 PROJECT CONTINGENCIES (10% AND WORK NOT PRESENTLY INCL UDEO ON BIDS) E 690.000 SUBTOTAL S 6,790,000 MINUS DOWNPAYMENT CIVIC CENTER FACILITY FUND f 2.500.000 SUBTOTAL E 4,290,000 ANNUAL PAYMENT/20 YR. NO INTEREST LOAN PAYMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: f 214,500 B RDA PORTION OF CIVIC CENTER/PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY: CIVIC CENTER BUILDING (11,800,000 FURNISHINGS* S 1,529,432 PROJECT CONTINGENCIES (10% RND WORK NOT PRESENTLY IN CLUOED ON BIDS) E 1,552,943 SUBTOTAL E14,882,375 *Aii furnishings costs to be paid through interest earned on 1986 Tax Allocation Bond issue. -11- RESOLUTION NO. 87-489 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE TO DEVELOP PARK LAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE BY LAND USE DESIGNATION TO ACQUIRE PARK LAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, WHEREAS, the City Council of -the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has adopted Chapter 16.32 oP the Municipal Code, relating to regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities; and WHEREAS, Chapter 1fi.32 of the Municipal Code establishes a formula requiring as components, "(the) average cost per acre to develop park land as determined by the public agency", and, "(the) fair market value of parkland per acre as represented by the land being subdivided"; THEREFORE, BE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. That the City Council shall determine and sat by Resolution the average cost per acre to develop park land in Rancho Cucamonga and the average cost per acre to acquire parkland in Rancho Cucamonga; and 2. That Che City Council shall review and adjust by Resolution, when warranted, the cost to develop and acquire park land in Rancho Cucamonga; and .. ^':^c ^-±~~ ~~tr her acre to develop park land in Rancho Cucamonga is hereby established at Eighty Thousand Dollars ($80,000), and it is that figure of Eighty Thousand Dollars ($80,000) per acre that will apply in the application of Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code; and 4. The average cost per acre to acquire park land in Rancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of implement Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code, is hereby established by Land use designation at: Very Low Low Low Medium Medium Medium-Higl High (VL) $ 43,057 per acre (L) _ $ 72,242 per acre (LM) _ $ 91,233 per acre (M) a $131,678 per acre 1(MH) ~ $152,305 per acre (H) ~ $211,000 per acre and at these figures that will apply in application of the aforementioned Municipal Coda Chapter. ~qµ d ac4u111 e t° dev Res lotion°veda oL thi Y 6, age c°s teYmined°t pats 1 ter SSepte~P peed 5 • paaKa ltodtettat P7rOVadSt °par a are l P a s setp vai~ye co 8~ ti The tent tl~B 16 p 19 ands p g 8b thBlp S~ypa 5ede land fCC Septem NoY gnu ~ 1, y988~,489 g3,9 anhich P nyORegOl Effe my°£JaRons °f1RSOi~ti oY Bparae~esPe t a a ° Proggsand povlsiOns tyt ve ovea Witbp°t shall apply ~ rdir Y vaiy aPP= th of day shat oved °r Bch app 16 t p Gate °f 5 oYTEp this AD and AppR~VEDr YASgEDr 19g~ . September, AYES ut, MaY°r 5 L Sto LADES Dennl p85ENT: nRTEST' ..1 tV ~letK ' Autnelet, ` $eVeYlY A. 1 ~: f~ r c ~; G L 5. The average cost per acre to develop and acquire park land as determined by this Resolution shall '. apply to tentative maps or parcel maps, approved or conditionally approved, on or after September 16, 1987. The average cost per acre to develop park land for tentative maps or parcel maps approved prior to September 16, 1987 shall be as set forth in Resolution No. 83-9 and previous land value method. Effective January 1, 1988, the procedures and provision of Resolution 87-489 supersede procedures and provisions of Resolution 83-9 and it shall be the provisions oP Resolution 87-489 which shall apply to all tentative maps or parcel maps approved or conditionally approved without respect to date of such approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of September, 1987. AYES: NOES: ASSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor , i ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk r ~~ t 1 8L4LOING AND SAFETY`ISION k/~+/ city of rancho cucamon 9340 Baseline, Rancho CvrnmoD a, Co. 91730 Te!. !?741 9 Euild~nY (0O l TN L Z AdAw 7 1 ___ _ ler RIxR imar W NP. 1 _ ___ 13062 _._ pwn•, r Lirlco! n Px_o~er~: om~y,___._ 2 MwinE Aeer.Y 1152 :leach olvd. s.:itd; E ay un .in9 -o aP ul, O Beach___~_926d~'-?1x-841-191 Co•r:vOVr G _C _B_C _ '~dr°r 16152 beach Biyd. ,_ Suite 250 E cn Nu n~irig .on - z~P ra W _ Beach _ _ _ _9264.7 ~,';`_v;;1;, Sbb L<, Gry ~ L1 O 6 Clvud. i°Q: .. Lc Nv. /IF L/ ArcF., E Q DnrRn•.~o7ff-Lance-ChrisCCpher/ArchitecCS_ At~t?0 Pocthill I~h-d, T`I 9R7-c909 Ciry 1LP tap RanChoSd~cacfonga 1 91730. 1~~. Nn C_D7S4 T R,vvw•d l1r J.l.nncn 1ari 1A:..,. ~ -__ - Z Si, EI. Z 1.16 ~ .,c„r 1 1'.0, ~ ga ~~ B9.,BSF BUILDING PERMIT Nv. TYP• Srw~er ___ Coml. Occ __ Grwp _ On. ~ Nv. D- Lwd ~ N v Uu Pwmn Der. Rev. Aapmme ~ ,Iryubed I No. - -- 'Am ~- A A ' __ _ _ ~- - APN PVee~ A H ~ pprw PP Plvn D fng ,,,JJJ 14L. PProv Dlv. 7~ l ,IFlre Dip. Sp« 1 Cv.Am . _ ._.._ __ _-- vewpnoN s - RIAN CPKb i GfRMIi /^1 ^/ I (~ /f GG ~ ~ '` 4 EI S'EMS µ ~ C~ 5 ~~5~ } ~ $ ' n . ~ ~ .. `d Ill .~/ LU/ ~~~ PAax s ~°~ 'J^MER P, q.~I u.,nl ~ F ` ~ ~ TOTALt ~;~/ ~ ~~ ~ d I _ qr }~ Adn ^ n '_ eepv, i- Dcmv'~ r vr'; I . i ~ / I f ~ ' "_ ~ ~ Lrn'NSm mnrnu rnx.. n .TUm N u rxN .R, ~Yr!~naATlan Nr r.APnn iN `i:~o :~ .re.m u m r °"-r.".~:",n ~„/.:"e`~,r::"~.. m, ` ~ ,~• . LJ G r ',m:. : p r..,. "+'C E~1OLa0 rnt;„ 1ik -1[ v l~' '. Y0.b '. .PPR Iff wP~r r~ ^~ d O r•...e..n,mu ,a°x°..,:: ,,., ~.., ...,.,~r. i.",r .d I`~a~..• • ^m ` b'ne~~r\ m " ~ " ~ _ n..Nn. <,. Y c YM O fPATFI Sry. iPON .•'rn, ,. F N'eP.t fIIN Y1:,YNnTInP r14 VNAN ~nn r v u ~ " n i ~/ , ; y b b . ,w... . ,..L, r .r..l « „rr w V „e4 I i Y „nr rrln bV.b.r.m..uv,,.r ~r.`~ ~r I I ~ ~._ 11 ' O 1 1 b .ra r n d _. ....eu ~n r . `_ ' N xvT n rin DlN, noenr ~ n Rn . , ..n ,. nr r ~~ ~ ` ! " ^ ~ ..,~.~. u y ur ^•nrr ~A „ ~w m ~ R. J n./ n Ie~ n. Ilr I, ./o nrl. n"..rn ., ".~.e,a ... :.r....u... ..:: n. ~.."i-r...aa. .... ,. y r, ~l I. SFr .n u r .b ' tb prr n L,,n.,. N"m YtonePl- i3 ~11iC /'~ ' r m.. .I~ . . n I~....n R•n ` / ~.,.Lr. nnl ...1i_SL~._~Yl sh i ro Ave - r u 1 1 ~ , ^n. n.re~? .na...u.rn ^ r ~I r I. Jn ^ l r..,~ .. m. n r.. ,o"r n.re.. Lvmu rnu i v yY b ^ r a l rm ., rn.r~l i, Irr M ___ P • P 1 ni, i.rnn_~ O ,//,~~ E~~E~~~~~~ ~~ // /~~ a "~ , p •^ r • _ n u S.m.lurr nr .lopll inllC`St r/ N ..._ _ _. _.. . __. _... _-_- N.~~ Anm..-1152 3e s.~_G~ a; f,47 v ~, gyn. F' ~4re Pe._ • I ~ rm. n n e~nm+R Ppmd .r.,, ProP•,h r,n•e oil, r~p..^ ,~d .RI dor.d, Y.e ~. r.ni.o M i (" ,'i )F'b e.P~rvnon .l wPrE I .,•v~er v vl rv~mrvrl yr n wbe~dM ., .>aMo~ed for IED dap • ECTION REGORD IN SP • ' RIUIIDATION: IGr. Cerlil. Camp. Tnb. Sekodir ~ y / / INSPECTION NOTES rn. 4inC SrxL F~mwnrn. 3 7 V , BOOR SlAS/1515„ GIRDERS' Mnb, vop. Bom/, ' ' R110~r Spom, darns, Venh, ir, lmbr. MASONRY: Reiet, Mwror ln, Grom llln, ClwmOuh, Rolh. ROOF SMTG Nmling, D'cpb Bloakrrg. Mahncl ~ _ Grode and ibd oy Rool Drarm. I i' (y~C 1 ~~/ 1• FRAMING Wolh. Rah, lib„ Blxk'mg, dmnnR, Ibding, BohlnG, Orap6r. DraO Slopv /(J INSOUTION 'x Lnm., bVOluei, Piprn9. Socnd ~~ / Coulbcg. / _ _ _______,______ _. v, FIAFWAIIS Mvienal, Thid•ns. Dampnt Dcp~ Cloven, Posrbl. '.r..Yr _, ~ .. - INTERIOA~ LAiX/DNV WALL NcJina, Supporh. ~ ~ __ lopF, lomr Runl 1 ALY /SIDPiCr Mur+, Fmre.en, lops, FATFPIOA l ~ _ _______ _______,____.. <Ynen. 8vabng c CLION FnnA Cmdi^a fnnf Aopr i FI PiSP imm , Fru. [,or.~o, curl ,b,,,..r. ".. A,,. r.. v ~ / ~ _ - "- '- o a rs. [urs. locking Oer~~n In^drrr9r Frr. Do ~ tf P / [ / ~j -// I ~ -'--' Xouse + ~mbos, WmrM1•• Srnnpvn p frnr ~ ~ 0 ' ` { ~ -- C'~.a, / I SWIMMING POOL/SPA + ----..- FxGAV ae'~r:p sErEACrsr e.m~e sn, eonmr nr I ._ _ _ _ - .__..- --_- Fn' .r~l p rmp I r 'vnorrrrl. Sr•/ imr I T _ _ _ . iL.nF [n vp.rio •i. .r r r FINf,I irr'~~F i, r. I r MISCELLANEOUS _ r SPns. . p ~ ~ .. r I _ .... 1 .i--. . .... .--. .... _ -. --... . f~ cX O L U i~ r cX G s ' EIUILDING AND SAFETY ION E / / ~ ~ EL C. MECH. PLMBG. c • city Of ranchO UCamonga 9320 B l R h PERMIT ine, ase anc o Cucamonga. Ca. 91730 . 7e1. 17141 989-~ 863 Burltlrng u N ~ 0 Ad ~~~-0 e~~^~ Atltlr 55 o, , <¢~n on I dninnt, Commrrnnl Indmbivq Z ~ e /9 Servicet id pin, it IS~m _ o.,ner Qt~e%v/~NO SsC ~ ..~`°V"e1=:'~<t ~eFO s..,mF..r Mdrrn9 ndtlress ~~ ¢ '~j //~ A. '<G N N Ar'~ ~ G ~ ' ~ ;~"° <~ 0 J s ZG z s s a o,i,<• ~tlnrra~r, , ,v ~E~; ~. e v I iS>«~r, , v 1-~ vo~dm ~nl Blda (n ll ~ W C9v Zly ?nl Sn. F mea r. l J W Per Avmrary dldn (n Sra!n i fn ' dion CYt ..r v :w ~ y.. 6 Ciavsr - j I . Fee I w rarees,n mrrxnrtrrxd nu r.annnrr~ ~ TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES r ru N N in. 0•mr r. n Nn Orm ron I M1 FAII 6 .e '1 I C p WW 3 t loo ` ~ - ~ ' ' IA ~ ~ g C ', FnU iW nw e u a rto or s xd ~ ~/ (' „ s n r Tin x 6 -, ~ H V° .... n . .,. .r, ,,^ ^r,~i r, ..r Q :. V~. ... . ... . ~ ~r] 1 .. ~. ~ .,... v Z ~ ~ ..m ~. ... n~ . ~ tlMl dm 4 J r ., .. . . w JOr -~ % ~ - - w ~ r T r /" ~^~ ~~ r OTAL ME !~14t ! Al FECS r, LJ "J iL;x) ~ < „ ~ W _. .. I r, _-_-i. __.. -... _-.-_- N ..... I ~., . , e I ~~'. .... U'..„ .r.. ~ . . . rn. r r V ~. Z ~rrx^ ~ ,-.. ~ ~ , . r. ~. .... r . r ' f .. r.. ~ °~ , . ~I s r n 4 T01 AL nLUMEINO FEES .r• c, _. ~ ~ ( „~ll<J~ ~,h~ T pTAL ELEC., MECH., ~'.MBG. FEES - , ~ re.v . ,r„ ,. ,.r.. ~~l ,. n... r rm...,r, .~ ~ ~ .r.,, n..,,,.lv cn.,, . ~ r mr,~ rr,n .nr,dr.i ,~e , ~~. .,. C'i?Y ..i m.•„ r r.....~ ,, ., ., ..~, r .t ,r. ..,,,. .. inr,.r INSPECTION RECD ~ `ISPECIOR NOTES ~ ' ~' UNDERGROUND CONDUIT __ - _ _ _.__.__.._ --.___-.-.-.-.__ _ ROUGH WIRING ~_ _ ~ ___ NEW SERVICE FIXTURES -_. .. ... ...___r___._ _ I . _.._.. ...... _ __ ._. ....._- _ ____... _.. .._.._...-. .. _.- FINAL ELEC. INSP. i TEMP. POWER POLE - ._._._..__. _ _ _. l OTHER I _. ._ __ .. _ _ __ _ _ _ _.. _ OTHER t ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. ~ 1 U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES ~q ~~ p RO. MECH. oar. come. w;,, ; .._ . .__ /`~ vnu ec u~,•, F6JAL MECH. vs~n sn„mn, ~G L' c' / ~ ~~ i . OTHER I _ __ i I _._ OTHER soil, wm.,, U.G /UNDER RR . . Ga:, S~nno~„ I wm.~ co:. v~~;:. I I ' RO PLMfiG . , S~ppoh, Fl.n.,ey, GAS TEST ~~. SEWER PR~V DISP SVSTFM DIAGRAM a FINAL PLMBG ~' ~-~' ~' " w ve .., WATER . TR 3 . .o u. v, .. I ~ I ~ SEWER/PRIN. P'P. SVSTFM I OTHER I OTHER i ' ,AS Uil',ITV CLRNCE ' ~ 6~'.fi'Ifl4 ~-- I ...J C:, ~, d 3, ,,... PIPVIG Ioi GA' :~,T ~ i ~ I "IFnn" , ~~ , .n I I a I ;Ir;n; rr;ry.. uIMeG r'~IIIiP _ I ILSPEr IIUFi I DATE INSP. SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFETY~SION city of rancho cucamon9a , 9340 Baseline, Rancho CDCamon a, Co. 91730 • Tel. 17141 N. l~'/ jr sr<rr< Z - LmoL ___ ~ --___-- laad___ ld No. W Na. __ &d.aemr l Own i , I__ 1~~~~k=-_- -__ _ ._ . _ ncor~'M Molllnp L _ i) (J.- L~_L~' Plc Di. peerw ~il_I "1 ~-±~_~i_ T i<I SP<i=~ ~ BUILDING PERMIT ' Consr Dn. An. --~Na, D. Ue rom^ ~ Aeaubed - nvN Dior s~== _____ ~', S,a p~~,ovd ' tt ppprov~ Fne Disr~_ Ir Eng D.v c/ I - J ,worm _ LP C WAn CN f ---_._- RI. ._-. vA C:ry __ -__- 1_ _. I __ ..__._ ._ - PLAN CMECM ^~ SI=re Lc _ _ _ ~ry No__ __ ~ 43LS ~_(~_._ 6 Clwnl_ _ ~~ PEAMIi W fn _~ ~_ DaM19ner Ar.• ~`rl _, _Iil ~ I - f ~ DAAIrJAGE ~ iel, ~_~ ~/ ~ I 14-' Srme I SY9FMS ` li It_ //n~i~~'-_ _ I ~ -:A ~:r. rmr. iOi AL~ ~.~ IUD Sn. FI. ~ /' N.» ^ A•a - e~m ~s m':.:... ~' ~D<* ~ -_ ~"~/, ~~ rrxn• r,vT:;:vnp., Lnx PL ...r :.., a=< c -, anon o .. ~ .. h.=..r... ,., . "`.n..(~:.w'~w..., > ..., ^. ~, L v avTxartre =<.+• .,` . r m•' .r. ,.I m , . :., ..,<.. c .(r.,m ~L CMi M rNrv.~... 'r < ~I;:m. .. ,,, ml .. _- rt.r N-e... _.__. Iv.. O ~. ~,, nl~- m nr;:i"%.,,.,.n.a «~ L °n u. , r. x~F.1LBl'~IW (N I~ ~ ? • i..•n~ 1< ~(,rFK1:0.rlil~n' ^oO }?r'r~[1~0. A.VfI i~ rX~~µNr..nnM"n M^r,V P~,~ I ~n....r.....A ~nv~Mro.< e`ea.~.r n, ~un (, nN ymme(.ar.Ir to rM O _ m.N m marl rln: ~ 1 .r:l.rn ^r Fn nn J.rn „(nlr•. .r.. ~ r~,'N..r ire . n.r .. . 1e ... ..~ :f .o-u ~.(rnn' I r ...n r rra n. .. ~rrl nr a.....A V ~rrM~<r., rn . ..~r m..: ..r.., n rmnn r ~` ~ ( ~ I TMV ~ ~ -- - ~,.~ }ter ~_-i=~- ~~ _. ~ : ~„. P,.r, : ___.'~ _._ 'O ~~.._ __. - -_ ..~• .,, . yV.a a<a .ol~am..l, a.e :, r~slxr rxlr . o e. ie~ro vAr^,I wn.. Pr<P<,IVm' ,,,,,d<a >r ..no<d<..e I<, '.w dr. L .mL m.,.~~a., . ~m ,gym erP"even A l ,,., EOUNDALIONIGr. Cernf Comp 1<nt pevbav6 fwm R.rvl Shel E.; iIOOR SLApI15vE., GIRCEAS vNern, vop Bvrnv. MAEONRY Reml Mwlar Jh Grom ldh ClmmOuh, Bolh. ROOF SH*G Nm'unB, Cape. dlal-q Nmer al Grade val ikd e i, vwl ma~a; FRIIAING Warp, ?vL, Jr's. BIy,6.9, 9nono -~ Nodin9, 2admp Jmpnr 9ralr < INNLALION r u, [ vplon P o r). Savad Covllmg, FIREW AI,k$ Mareriar, }4„l-tff .ampe•r Oran INtERl09~ lA1H; pvv ws, a .v F+pporh. L<v , Im ! Rrmr F%LFAIOV leis AJ14G v<: rn lav+ fINAt ~ieOr~rON - ~ 1 cep .,,.-,- , ,..~~.. .. ,.d. , SWIMMING POOL/SPA 6~ ~ .r I •il.'. .r. .. ~ ~ ~~ f .. NL. . -^ MISCELLANEOUS • INSPECTION RKORD I • INSPECTION NOTES Q L.. __.___ _. _... _.. __.. _._ V ^C, Wr C ^Q, TW V BUILDING AND SAFETY.ISIDN city of rancho Cucamonga 9310 Baseline. Rancho Cvmmongo, Ca, 91730 • Tel. X714) 9891851 ~ BUILDING PERMIT B„nemB .. v d L ~ E' No. ~ rro< ae. C .tN~/ l Ada,.., ~ sle._ cenrl creep - - ~- ~ lc, Bled Tln _n No. ~ .. D«. !Nee Dw V,< Pe,m~~ ^ po. 1<r. n A,g e<d ~ ue~ I! A<n+"<d lepa __ _ _ _ _ -- ____ ~ -1_~..~._~_.~ C~~ _ Bedi_ Sae y _ MoiIInO ~ T -~~ ~~ APP~w APP'e°<~1`` vC' ~'~( gPPlor<a ~ Addrm ~~ V_ _ City I ZP)„~/~ r 1' ~. v: n _Plon D~.,~O ~~¢ En9 Drv. Ll - P~ e Dul. BPtt~ol CPntrozoor - --~''-&~--~ !N.~~-.-- - ._.. ~ 950 ---- -- - Mdrnr uy np r.I. '1 I A IL V. i O ~ _ /. z I IVA h f Bmle Lc 'h , be Ne.~l~l~ •, 6 Clm nl. PLAN CNKK _ _ _ oniyo._ ' ~ i ~Lr ~ ~' /: "~ ' J- F PfFMiT _ _ (_-~ y . _ _ i : __ ~ L !- ~Addr<,\ 7 bell ! , ~/.,ol F I DAAiNACf _ t.._~ , __ z 'sl et c E ~P .~ e hi i~'.l 1 : =-'> _,< New, ~r,;'K SYSIEMs f _.. __ 5 BfAU''f. ~ _~ /~ ~1 +y / p Om;q FI '. hP se ~ Imm TOTP V ' ~~ l ~ . B I V<rd~rJ Br uJC> .rz n .e.a Dale ~<., Aee, A,I. r- .m ~ ~~ 7 b , f11uTRAVTVNP P PII~iN ~ R N wnRPk'. R4 r'rNP1:NPATIPN Pft'I.APATIIIN N1 IW ~n ~ ~r r~~ ^ I~Ty~~ M rn~'N Bo,~na~ vn~~i'm wp'anr f..lr .nn - I vM1'' Imn~+nn~N'I Nbm~l . vrn.lirvl mpv tnr. . . r~n vM mf r '~A. ~Mr "^~^~'enn Innrn p ~ fmm ~• IF111 R N l ^ n^LaA rvP 'v fn n Y l•lii~l _ rmpv ll~rn 'A m .nbv . : ^I r~ ~ fT u n• r O 1~.J1 v Iuvn~dvA ' NO ^ m .A Purv ~vrr e~~ I a u V i vPTirll ATF t1P FlAFV PTIIIN P N NPR9' fVVi'FTFA IIP; 1 .9VMMf ) r ~ n n p ^ •rr I rv i ~ n,in. ...l ,..I nrl•I vl v v .l In~ •u~ R ^ nd, eevlv \ for I'I A ~ ~ ~ e. ^r I , ~~mr vunlevt u M '~ L~ rnv Fx rv~ 4W 1 \ , M ~ ll N rrw;, i 1 MN 1. U nrrlnmumr ~ u\• n. u•MrnnWn, I r.1r A. nn .~.o ~Bnr r~• ~ ++v n•.II m mpverr av • o^vr nl r. A A r n...r\ Inr A p A r o rn v wr.l, rr IMI. t N v.nArv. Vvmr _.~ _ O i !Ar n .~W mm ~ Irvn.Mrv A.I.I n.. __ Nu p r!r r....A n .~inl.nrN ivi r ~ 1 r vur ,ml F in.Nr. A ~..... i....nm rA, rnnt~u.ra I i .rnx In I u enllnr ~ I~ .u M Jlnr n n'In ' V 1'r'!r v O,I m.v.m. ~n.lvv,w ____ N. -- ~tr~ v r Pp ~v _ - 4min . AM,~ rAir rt o bpilding Vevmd wbee prnV<'ly IJLd aul, upped and mbdebd. and a rvblal Ie I' )U (;11VV <.v^obon l wovl rM1rr<pnde• ~~ enr mmm.end or n mlo<~ded or obP"daned for IPg dmr. . INSPECTION RECORD • rauNDAnoN Iry, G.,m. eRmp. *nh, seroan., INSPECTION NOTES ferns, dln1. Slael, F+aa+vum. nOOR SW/JSiS„ GIRDERS. Mnh, Vvp, Borne., NLg~, Spam, .kau, Yenh, ir. Lmbr. MASONRY. Rebl., Mwmr lh, Grour Llb, Cleen.UrR Bap., AOOf SXTG Nmlinp, p.vph. Blapmg, Mvrenal Grade e i TFId a r, Reel prmm, FRAMING vWaIL, Toll„Jtlr.. BlxFny. Brvaing, NwBng, Badmg, Dlvphr. Dm4 Smpa. INSULATION t'~ ran, R Volue+. P.pmO, Sound Caulbng, FIRfWAII$ Melarrol. LM1icYnnf. pampeh, Owrl, amen, Fm~nl< I~nRr. INTERIOR lAiH rORV wALL Nairnp, <. ovarM1, Lom, Jvrnt Rmnl F%fEAIOR uiH'S3DING MmM1, fonenn rapt Pvpn, ibd+eu. Bac ~~g ., SINAI 'NSVPGi104 Fi h Gom^g C~.er, Snnr mb<r w.aner Smpa~^p I F Leo SWIMMING VLiVtI)YA U(CAV p! N% UiBACY.S Rodrv: ',r wrn Pnn,i Erc bl i ~ .p~ n, r i 'N4! 'Il .i , . n .. MISCELLANEOUS ,np. ,. J_._-__.._.._-_ ..____.. __..__... _-_-_ i .. .._- _ ___ ._ ...-_ -~ I .... . _. ... , .... __1_-_.. Z 5~ O V e C 4 BUILDING AND SAFETY •ISION city of rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cucomonaa, Ca. 91730 • iel. 17141 9P9-IA.51 !bn n n euidmg pnm9 . n p.operlY r'~:etl eo end medorad. o~d n mbjwr h (I lny '•mropo~ a won re.,rvoa<- ~r nor wmmro.rd or .r reme~dee or oevodo~ed for iw aor+ ~ BUILDING PERMIT w~id~rrR ~ rvo. Trpe ac I ~G/>I Add<e ~~ ~ 1< Sro: _ __ C~n _ _ U p_ ~ ^__ - /[ RI«Y imd lot Ne, 7 _ _ rN< Uw Ue Fmm~ an Rer. Ow l«d U~rq Regmr<d ~ wqubed - .. ~~<r No, lo: 5ife AIN f 1 s r ~ ~ ' :Ilnr M ed PpPrwN APPrened Addr / m (/ yn Eil e __ ..... _. } 1Y U1 ~- _ ie Ee9 Cr.. Rre Cnr. Pm~ o _ ___-._ _ _.__ _ -_ _ -- QV ~_~ ZiU iel C. PJ ~ _, ______ Snmgl CPOdmo r~, _ __ ~~ jIrp_ /"% I 1 ` = ro Via T<F sc - qr o .- 12__.L 1 vewenoN s .. __ - - -- .-- - sme Yrc. c'ry PLAN [NKA _ _ _ ___ _ _._ ~ - ~ _ - - ~ . Aemml ~ ~ Trri p~ .z,::rucl f E I ' Sm:~ ury lzp srsrons E~ I~r N,. I _ _ _ --__- Prep«rd y S RFAUr¢. I // L ,.~~. F[.. :~. I PARK 1 O'°EA ~ I sa. Er ~ I ~., o. ' ~°' ' liM Pf r rotn~'', 23 SD "~. ~ 1 .: , r f r rT. Ntlrrrv LIfRN a EM f ': r.f nXTR.tfT i r x Nf'fl~5 nMPENRALIrr '. ^ i. .I(.m rrAµ: 1 • ..rrtil:r. nr. :..RUll1. nru . .~r . rrn:f ^ r unMr 1 Mr.r nffrm of prrnnnl..•~..Yd - ^f.nl~virnn. n rll.rr nl rM Bw..•, ren r..l. n lali Inr. ~:i rn ~. r Hi iM .t r. IA : "~ ~~ m n7 ^ r ~ r . r n e .n Vn 5. T4 1~.C Z / S4C rn~vpny ~ // n !' I t A rv'~ nil:.d ey larn^S ® • w . n. !mm rM ur n ^ N ~ ~~ I N T r Y ^ ^r. r ~ai. rA : • n •vil• vrr r m ~ e m Y N NAEhRgIN, P~NVni1 44 v . < i' r lW n n rY : r n . ~ ra.rr nrM ••nrr r ' r d .ee Yrr(/nW.. :lrmi lw en ~....rir Irr I ~ I A~• rl ~ r n• m v :n: r•n.r..r Mr ...,i..:tn. .:. A... rM Iurn.. Irma r rrnnr :fir r .. f ' or F.r w. •Anl :II. f ~vfl.l t' ~~ I ~r ^ _ r rn M - r, - IrrN I. f.NirlN(: I.GP.dC\ FR0.tr(T ~•,~ n 1I.~r nrA _.t •..r ..~, n, rn ., mgr ~ r W ^ M ~ r rl. r. i. .inn :..TMVI r r rn. u..l..~m.n.. II' rw. r r " ~ r :C .. .. r.,. ,. .. ,nr ~. ~f'~:,°.. r.,r o .A....n.. ,..,.. ,r.. ...,., . y Y. :n. .nr RrA rA \ !nr ..n,....m. _.~,'4_ "•" ~ :. r.. ~ : . .. ~. . m. m .r ...^n. ,oy . , .., , ..,r.. ,,. r.,.rn . • i ~:..r rte.. ~~...... ..r.. .n u r ~~ f f n~~_L x n ar.~~ _ / / ~ Y • RVSPECTION RECORD • fgRIDATION: ~Eil. CvliE. Camp. Ton. SeMoa4a, fdmo, Reinl. $MI, 6mwnw. [. J ~ INSPECTION NOTES ftOOR SW/ISTS., GIRDERS: MM, Vop. Borrut M4g., Sporn, Aaaen, Venn, Tr 4mb. / 9~/qQ Fti7'L~~ /al'gt_e di RR(C BIABONb: 4m1., MwMr lrr., Grow Llln, mO Cl 0 ln w ary, o . ROOF SBTG Nadbig, Diaph. BlaFng. Moenol Grode end ihi:'nen, Poo( Dmlm. fRAMING O B 4 B W ll R mnng. : o a. o .. Lh., Ia mB, Nailing, Boating, DiopM1r DraO Slap: INSULATION, •~.dnm, RNalun. Piping, Sound <eul4lrq, fIRFWALlS: Molenol 1Mhnm, Dnmpen, peon, Clown. im:01e W4:. _.-__.____-_.__ _..____~-.__-_ INTEPIOb lA1N/pRY WALL Nailing, Supporn, laps, lainl Aanl. - ~ ~ ' F%TFRIOA lA1HI51DIUG Mmh, Fa:rrnar, Lapa. i toper, ThrtknerL Mc4inq fINAI INSPECTION. Fnnh Grading fe+n(, Slope fire Doan. Fn loa4ms Oe+rcn.Y~londmq+, e Vumben 13 Weoiher $pippin0. PI )Fngr, Clecr ? /r~<j/,{~ as aa~i as !-s~~ /`~ ~ ~ ~-~~ , __ _._. .... _ _ _ mlmmmv rvAaA/prn 4,.--__ IXGV R ~r 9m Srl, 9ondm f i:rJf. $FTAACKO. Red e. ~nldml p I _ __ - __ ____... _ _-___.. ~ _~ E.p btl. Rorn ImPIX fl if.NCf'Ga'S r ~ _ ._.___ tahb<v 're ''. I FINnt I^pla V ^ M r. e, ~ i MISCELLANEOUS ~~ srp.•,.~.,~ _ ~ .. _. .,. t~_ _ .. ~ ._ ~ i i 4 1 r I , ....._ - __ ._-1---.-r~-._ , ,BUILDING AND SAFETY ION •I city of rancho cucamonga 9320 Baseline. Rancho cucamonga, Ca. 91730. Tel (7141 9a9-1 as3 BvllUing Pb Cv,o o'~a~ Adc Z noa,=:: 9867 Banyan He 8 elo" 3R n.~r 10076 °wne• LIGHTNEP. DEVELOP^fINl' Maemg name:z S90 N. Euclid Ave. #202 O am Iipland ~z'P 91786 t"~. com,d<"C.W. TAYIfJR PLUMBING, INC. noares` P.0. BOX 847 w °"` Chino Z"'91710 "" 591-1791 \ Sidle Inc IGI. / n cldzA~~ 426865 C-36 v„ 6711 W I.IfKY[l.Ir ,n~'tM~fYnllp nF.r'. a~ rl~ n ~ H O ~.,nem , • ...~ ~". .., ".., ... ~i ~,.m...m:,..~ I.l • ... .... , .., ,,, ,.., .I.-~~-86 w, .._ i'J1. tlOS 1547 ".. _. __ . i'h i rn ~~ ",A 917111 _.._-.-_ ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. PERMIT s.,.~r„ ISze 1 or:ra, W IACeme~ln 'agfie, Swn«m, N c. .., N v,r ~ IMP <o I Q ! o,~„ p[ 50 ~, 4ren ,. ~ Rmde^Im~ 91dG~ (n W S9 °' Men uv ~ e„ n:..,,rr a F, W Wc^ Ct; Fee I p.~o-'n ica tOTAI ELECT RICAI FEES ' inu • 6 0 C vo W ...., d i L: N f4U v I IA -. C• T "c0µ 6,U I ~ Nv. 'S MP f Smp In Q ,r..~ : ~ . A...,. n d„ ;..,,:. "n o nnao ,l., a ~".. ,,, o`.. _ - - , ... .." W •• f TC fAI MF(. N.AtaiCAi FEES . ncr r n N v.. m ly „ J .. n.... d ' TOtN PIVMftt,', FEES TQTA ' EIEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES i.. I DI r!ll ', (iI1 1/ . ~~ r I :.r r~,~-; U n I I o " . ~".", ~'/f.. . - mgr ".I ~ .cl odnl c_I .., I ru. ,obi".I n «: .. ~ .o I ., ~ .._.. .". ".. „ .." ,. L...df~ p INSRECTION REC UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ROUGH WIRING _ _ _ __ NEW SERVICE_ ~ _ l fINAL ELEC. INSP. ~ TEMP. POV.'ER POLE ~~ OTHER I . ___ . OTHER i ELEC. UTILITY CIRNCE. ' U. G. DUCTS~REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH. °o`"• <oms. n.,. . s~rro, ~. vemi ~ FINAL MECH iAU/AC u.~r yim~, Se~rorr~ OTHER (U.G.. UNDER FIR. Sor. wao, ~ I • w,... c.,~ v. m: RO PIMBG . s~~ c„~ ao• I I ~ f GPS ?EST i 9 FINAL RLM E:i. ' . r. .. '. C ~ WA?FR 'ERR , ~ SFWERR«IV ~,- ^?HER OTHFF ~ GAS LITI LI"I CI I ., ~',r'~ .,,~ ; ,~, ~',I f OI i ~,~, . ' .~ rm r R II~.PI' SE WFR'RRIV DISR SYSTEM DIAGRAM I I BUILDING AND SAFETY D•SION ELEC./ME(N./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9349 Easeline, Rancho Commonga, Co. 91730 • Te! 17141 9891851 < < Z / 1C{ , J1N G eea..~WC~~~C-~~8~? / / / L~::< w T f (/ ( I, ~<( ner ~/ 4_ _ /L~:.1~.<r-w4-~-~~1/JL//-Y4~~ . 6 ~ 3 ~~'~I~r I L.gl:l+. $wilf Fe51 o< C L Aam<„ ~O-/,7rX. i /s~[Jr~ ~?_. r<I ~p_)-_~J .. Z: v~ Kr/~iJ `~~ y y r r,<r°e M°+olt ~ _ /~LJ (L(. ~%L~=L_ ° ~K ~ Irv /1 Li <e~: _ L~ a or~ ~ Lr_If~L r//L _ a - ~ O:I~er ~///N d 5 O Addrn, ~ ~ 5/ u / ISV« Y . Area New Fr 5 - ~~~~- C. ._ Z, _ _ r fel. ~ , 0, 9eudem:al BId9 1 ~~ j6b I c/ `'"[/ /u. 9~~ 31tc4 ~ :p"II A,<o N<w _ _ f 1 G J 9<5 Aaemory BIJg II (~~~! !I (n 1 W BroM1 ,< 37996 3 ~," N,. 003525 W 114°:,.« «< 6 CI I ilox CF, (~H/ fee I + `~ I /\ I n L.IJ n d..r r ,'.. x. n ..._ ,r, '. r._ , , ..,, ^ lir ~' 5~ L O N ro a N r :.. w. .. f~ „., ,. .,,, ~: ~~ ~..m. „.~,., ~ ~+ :,.,.. , , ..~. ~ i ~.., ~ ~. q ~, ~ ' ~~ //~ ~(., c `'~1c cam./~ct~ L`/T~.yi Z:3c? TOTAL ELECTRICAL PEES « r fAU V6 .<~A BI C ^• Y xi r 1 r . C I O iA0 ov mp B ~ ev r Im ooo B'U yep +r 6 I /s ' 11 w, I s.:p A o d tl a ,n.,,,° m o a ' bx°rr r°od Z i Yem Vn- I o"°' ~I,. ~~~ ~ iOTA i Iv1(fllAPaUL FEES W Z r.... r:... m ~ JI ... ..r ~ ., i -I. r r...-- . ~ iOBA! PL~,MBn :Yy FEES ' TOT ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES j )~' I'/t( p. /'1 L/ tn. BY < 'I ~t-~~~ d .<~/ice rlrrn~. Wren ^Ple: ~ nq p .Inn I pnlY ~: I ~ed and v~axn.J °.d a +,. ., •.p"'r^"' •~.r nr.. -dr. + nrnJ.n In~ip9 d°vv. '. i', .,-0it VVY INSREC710N R ECORIi INS~EGfOR NO7E5 UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE FI%TURES PINAI ELEC. INSP. / TEMP. POWER POLE .-__ OTHER -- ______.~__ OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. p w~.'r U. G. DUCTS~REfRIG. LINES ~ ~-_ o"m, cemn. u,, RO. MECH - ___.__. _ __ .-_.- ---.__-_ . Suppay, VmM1 iAU/A[ UNI FINAL MECH. - - _ --- ~-- -- Y>^M1 sn.roxr OTHER OTHER U.G.IUNDER fLR. $OiI, wm.r, -- --- -` _ _ _ _____GoL_Sa_p_p_orM1 .. .._ ___ ._ _____ _..-.. _.____..___. RO, PLMBG. s"cn=;n~riorn ~s~~ ~ I GAS TEST SEWERIPRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM FINAL PLMBG i"'"'^~ °°'"O' . x," v w,l.rr, ' WATER HTR . _. .. rurr. R.; vote ~ SEWER~PRIV. DISP SYSTEM .. ___._ OTHER OTHER G4S UTILITY CLRNCE, '' BOP: DING I 1 r ii ~, rnNniiiT ' GA.. PIPING a°~e.,°i, o.r~^ .. . ~ ~ GAS TEST HEATEk °','.,°'sM1~"~~pil I t ' FR:AI POOC EIEC. I FINAL POOL PLMBG. OTHER WSPCt.TION DATE INSP. SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ BUILDING city of rancho~ucamonga PERMIT 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 • Tel. 17141 989-1851 eeimi~R EJa4 ~3~~ Ca I E Na. ~ Typ. ar ~G, ~: e 5,a.:.` .,K Z ~ _ _ _ Aeere„-- Lal TBIO<k lmcr I o .--- --- --- - Om. No D«, ~ O,e pomil .u- Dm. Rer. lma lmn Re9~^ed ReQUired W No. ~ _ Na Epl s:.e rAPN ."" .D 1flLYJ - --- Ma:l:n9 ~ l _.. _ ApWG.M APP'avq APP w roved k i N Addra! OM _ -__. -.-. .- /~ Eng Dw. ~y Pore Dar. clan Dw, --_ 111 --. cy nP ra. ~ 2~ ~ sp.<:al comm<wr tjw1N~CL>------ ... ._ .. - _. --.___ ~JP~,LF.MG!-~'TAL $rP_ t0 S.$__ J Aaernr _..-....- ~~ •xi Sg°JZZSSSJED Sf4~78 w cry Z'~p 1)I. wnnoN s 1 q p 00 vA Stile La 6 <lo,ml, l.c. No. i PIAN CHE<K ._...... W ArcM1, EnRL, FEAMrt I-7 ,~j Z3 Dn:ener - _ ._ _ ..... __ - . - Q - - - ~:e Atld,n ~ F.i DRAINAGE c,r ~ lap -IIsob N E~ srs*LMS E e. LC Pronwed -- -~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r:...:..:.,.,,, Pl1QWJ5E OG T PE12N~T U IS c BFAb11P _. _ _ _ _ IS "'Cm_. ,Q Fd~2M ~kN AL Inl$p. ~ j ~ Y i 4ARK °l,.'A .. Z f ~// O~ACI I ~ O h 7Y1_ D D rn ~ sr, P~~:.,,,~: ~ e: re„ Pm,. . sa. n ~N ~n o F µ~,~, s~ ~ ~. ~ ToTnL~ ( ,, .J ~e °L.., ~ ' ~ [~ 5 ~ ~' ~ a, ~" ae 86 ~ Ne. Ad. L !~ I: I ~ INl r F ~ f Ar ..: r np r~~ ^ . I f f I ~ rv ~~ ~. . O m, 0 o ~ ~ . 11 N M l TMr ^Y .rrt nn nr• mi Y~ l , ,1 JM I, .~,..n a lJ /l 1 I .. .... y/ ~~ ' / II' .,~mnnrc 1 1 '~ . p ' L .,A an - C L O ~I n . AMlrn .. r. A .... r fAlr h o bvadmp permtl x'Fen n,ope~lr blbd nol, opne0 and mr dalad, and n mbjvl to erp'~~~ Len A war! rh•nu Mo, : nol rnmmrnrnd or ~, ,mper!4 or pbn~donetl lo• iF0 dap, , ~: ~~ I. 1, ,.. )PY • INSPECTION RECORD WUNJA'!O J C ' S ' Fo m Pe 5 ' d FLOOe S n8 ISr•, r p., BFO McmP ~ ~ ^^ MASO:v CVC P.... ... .r ~ r n.~ ROC' <~. ~ .. .. raA,.~~,0 ~ __-..___-_-_ r.. „ INSpiAPOV r . ~ R \'a' .. C. m <nu4rA FIAi'A'AIIS ~, rp^~~ ~ ~~ bo ~ f.1 H. ve Ir.rE9!OP IAru P~ 'NAI. ., ] .~.~ . Jn'~~ Rt^ FMrei'OP 'R.. a .A. v. •..i ., .... Pn.> C'~q• .. SWIMMING POUL/SPA Exx ar ,J+p4Ck5 Rar, ~.:... f,. m . _. I .. MISCELLANEOUS i ~j„_,~ ` i _ INSPECTION NOTES __ 11``--`` I _.._ 1 ~~ ., .._ -- __ -__.-__-_- _....._ ' _ Y- I _. _ .. ._._._. __.._ __ _ ._1_- ___ .. 1 ._ ___ ___ --_-_._-_ i_~__J- ..J .,....- -b ,m. .~ ~~ _ __ _ 1 L~ ~ .` ~ t' i ' t t ---~ i _ _1._-,- ..1 ~ .. .. A``-~ ~.. Q~~ \` onwl cY1 Toro ~[fl-Y V' l1JY~111 oR k IpPW p4~ pp011bO ~~ V[MIIGNiOp_-~ Y/M VINI YMII[pI\ ViM1 PCL(i! N011 n/t--usx,uo %lonr Im1n rtu[ I1 CnbN :11{ :t M.N :V t¢NNI - to hlw ^r~i1y ~~ Gf(I IrY - 11 .%(N 1~H1 •16N - ]11 IpP1 •{ f11Nw%IYM .n KUVV ~ iu~nao ~ un couo ~a I1s1 .oau fl r1 IunN no~nv.~~ , NHIIUpN ( r./,.....,. . INU N(PI Ir~V%, NNllp 11111 IOplp 1'~w111I G.I •\l/N\•~ ____ NCiN111 1IN .• .1Ni-- Y~1 Up . . !1111 ri N(N ~N J r 90'v(Un k.%iip N(.Ilp . _... nlct~ -_. ~~ I~~ ~. .. ~... ..~ .~. 1 ~. .'. _ s.... ....~.~~ ~ .....~. {`{` .~. I""'r AY' '1 .~.. .I:~ii• re:.%11 Y']f11V A\1 24I ~. ~s r ..~. ~...- :.%:l:^111 .~~......~.-~~ ~.~ :.t A~ ..._... .., i n._ _. /~/ i ._ _ .. ~..._.._ _. ~~ ... ~.. .. ......~.... _ .a_...n m...n~.. .... ... .. .....~ ~~ n .. .. _- ....,.. _~~ ~.~... ..~.~ s / n.~ ~I~~l y^ _ .. r•. ._ _ ... /. • .~..- ~~ .~. F..t... .. .._~ .... ........... ....~~~ .. _ .-.. _~ .... _. .. i ... ..~ . ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. .1 . ~ .... .._~.. _s •,.__..... •.. .. .... _ _._- ... __. _ .r .. ._An . ( • BUILDING AND SAFETY D•ION amity of rancho cucamc 9320 ease!ine, Rancho C camonga, Ca. '3173^ • T?I. emlar•q ~~ Z Apdreas ml arax rrac~~ /_ ~ /J' W „p V/ // wrier/ _ , ,J - Marlrnq /~ ~~ AQUras 1. Qh .) i O Con > 7 ~ / Atlare ! ~ W cn 1~ 1. G „r - ~~' \ Srat be / 5 Crzssr ~- L~c1 ~N~~ ,~..~ ~ rrP.~a,9covra,orrrnsa.~r.. D r_ _e..,~~r r. ._., ., .r ..~.... ~.....r ^,, n~luir Iorr.Y.n ~ 1 rN f..,r~n..~~a i `~j L O U O+ ^~ W E c0 Q nx.m'x,xuuarax nli i.nenturp I J~ a n. m.r r .n ..wno~ p.+m .n. r...mr.m. r... n.. Ie~ n. rn. O ..e.. mar M rn....n .., r..rn..r . ..n .r..aa .r ..r.r ^r .a. U ;r..r,.r. .^..rrv.r rn.. ,_ ........... ............. .....~ r.. O I rim r.•mor nr l., i' . r i~....~. ^r ..~, a, ,r.w r. ..,.. r.r~. ra,rr,~. ..r...,,.m ..r r .,.r , ,..,.r...., r ._., ,,, ..r .,~~., ... , , ....r w....r, r,mo..., .. i..~r... ...., ...~ .,~. .. _r :., ..~.. ~'~...,. O 1.... ~,,.~..., ~ ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. ~ PERM IT o.~ g53 . No on<,rprrorr Udder _cpm _rcr._rndr,r o0 _ _F_.<__ _ IFettoro<rer bgxn s..n<nnl _ _ __ e .. ._ ... I;~P [ 1 I OrM1V _ Isp<nrr - II 59 R, Area New 8evd<-ual Bldg. _ _ C _. _ L Se, Fr b<a New a<v Au< my Brdn (`~ Y Plw Cox I < fee ~~ I mort ~ Fe< iOTAL ELECTRICAI FEES No o-ra.~ph,n v„ oard~pr,or, V FAO m d •o V n ~ imJ[r,'COmp.. IM MC flit/ ro 61n<md ] ItP ~ FpU oen Bode Comp IDO MO d`O mJNP ro'~S MP ^. ~.ro . . i 1 .... ~ i a.d o,oaq dm ~ L ~ a ... l , a "Nq <Im •` . / Yn - fin I ~a O e~ ~ j c" ` . r.. ,., u "' T("~iAL MECHANICAL FECS •~ prop e,rl, ~ .~ ~., ,,^,. r , _ ~ n .^r,.., .r.r wo. r, ^. rp s,rr^m ~ ~ . r.., .. Sw.• ;..,, zl ._ .. , _ ~'~.... c'tii 2 . . ~ P~,. ,.' J F.e . F.. ~v..^^ 1 TOTAL (~~. UM9ING Ff.ES TOTAL ELEC., MECH., P.,ABG. FEES Porrne'1 2~ Sp[r 4r ,/~ CovA f<• -- I r.rm~r.. ~ o~M1M•or, ~ , rl^r. ^nl/merhnn '+I/. ~I~ .fl f ~ w _r f'o nrlY lilir r'.C^n end, and . V 7./ y^r radio<I to p ~ ! .r rhe~ni~rdnr n .n^^~r ,. i ru.PPndna n r, rnde'rd for I~ d%r. NEW SERVICE FI%TURFS __ FINAL ELEC INSP. _ TEMP. POWER PlIIF OTHER___` _._ _ ~ ELEC. UpIITV CLRNCE. li U. G. DUCTS~REFRIG. LINES o.<n, come.-A~.-. RO. MECH . . __ 5 r00e<M, Venlf _ FINAL MECH FAU/At wlr I OTHER ` d OTHER U,G,/UNDER PLR. `'°'~~- war.,, wee„^cm''vmic RO. PLMBG - . - s.ov,n,. nosn~..gs _. _. ~. r GAS TEST F~.rv~s. vam<s, FINAL PLfABG . Su.~ ~ °.,r v,i.,,, WATER Hik , SF.W ERj PRI V. DISP. SYSTEM ~ OTHER ~ OTHER I, GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. BGN7NC mn~nin. GAS PIPING ~+~•.-„L v,an GAS PEST HEN F, n<,,,,,.<. ~. .,, •,n INAI. ~+:ql uE~,. ~'~NAI POGI PLM 6G. )IHF.F INSPEC 110N - ~ -- - _ -- i :Z I SEWER; PRIV. DISP, SYSTEM DIAGRAM _~ INSP. SIGN. BUILDLNG AND SAFETY ION /ME(H /P ~' ELE( LMBG city of rancho Cucamon . . ga PERM . IT 9340 Baseline, Roncho Cvmmon q Cn. 91730 • Trl 1714 9R9.1851 emlmnq ~h~ ~ Gar rvo. o.rmoeee IAaemox., eomm.r<~ol, rrd_wmop __ __.1_.. --_...__ R« Aaorosa - S<rn[ev Z ^ Trae Ha ~ ~ o• ~is~..< -- ~ - . ~Zj Ji3 £ o _ --- ~.L~ o ~ l nr rm ~.~ ~ ' s l wa u e or <r ,~e ,. -r . -_ Maihxg Aee,caa Solo Af GY~R 0..r r ___. ---- .. rAemr,_ _--__ - nv G ~, no T fb 28.' I IMP <o,_ - _ I orF<• ~ __ O °~ Y~..-~s ScA. ~ Et~~.r i w e_ _./ I l~o«,,Y r~~ ~ -- • -- ' -1.0 O Bq f.. A.<e rv<w J ~~ ~ A s~ ~ Res dermal Bldg. ~ h _ _____ Fr Ar rv B _ W '` L CiIY M< •~'~HI. Z ~j~ *~18~ f/oQ7/ <w <a g Rer A[rerrery BId9 __ _ _C ~ ~ ) / Stale L: CdY yy 6Ca ~~GJ 7 lac Noo 0~ s .,~ Plon CM Inuar'a Fee Fee __ _ _._ .~ _..___ ._ ~ ~ ~V QJ W r:xxcn r ..xnnaxx nen.Axnnnx ~. TOTAL ELECTRICAL PEES ^ T .~~ ..... M I«..a tia.. em.,.o-r.. rr.~x.. `n.:..n m. 2.n.,. mono .... n r '" rvo ~ D<r<r~A^, o, ruo o»n:peen _ ..u .e s . y,:,i.rrcmm~r ;. a I 3 eR we r - - r» „< _ loa.BBB Bm o I - ~~- •r.x OOnn.nxx n.r ^ r' unnnnn ~ fAU or r Body Com I e ` ^ I ,.^_,^ m.r I .m .n.vvr rr» rn. r,a...u.. L,.... i.. n~. n. 19 v BiU i r ] Xv o LOB OOO . __ _ ~ V .~,.~.., ....~r.<-. ~~ ~ Q .T~ ~I { . • d aaa0 dm ,X.e<r l .n Sn r Bon 1 A tller Z .~., I .., ...m:~ ..n..... r. . r r n., .l..~... O Sn - Z , e f•BOU1 botl ~ .< dm O BOO ~'. v.m Fn ~O'he. . i I-.lud •~~ • p[ v fl,r PI' e ire ~ ,non. -___ ~__-. _ _ _. W W TOTAL MECHANICAL FEES ., r.. ~~.xl rx . .. . ' r ~< ~ ~ r nxo. r« L W w O O /, ~~ , n r U..-_- ~ y o nY w .. B; 5 V ,..~eu~ . ~ v~~. rx,+ r. ~. . r e.•. iDlr Snwm .. .... ., r ..., ~...~ Z .,,.e~.. .. ,o. c _ . ~ ~ A;,o ,.,., iV ~ r,..,.„r" r,, , ~.,...~,.,~......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .. ~ ., .. „ .,~..„.. , .,..,_..r.. ~. .,~ . ......... ... ~ ~ iOTAI PLUMBING FEES ~ , ~ ~, TOTAL ELEC.r MECH.r 'LMBG. FEES J (r~ o 5' ~ e. , s~e. ,e, , x. .. ~ .~..._ _ _ By ,1 I~ Z7. _ ... ___ __ .____ ._. _. ___ __ . • Vnl ~.~~o^ Dore 1r,r ~ • a lm•d.o. ro.!n ~ m i e •~ .nv "' om r n<d and eol,Jmed, nnA n ~;: ~ m ~d o.., ,~,r,<.e.e ~ o~. io«e mr .~ d..,. I •.e e~ o~ ~~ -e. n..<,~n.• ~ .,.. r.m. INSrErnoN ILEC rECroR NoTEs UNDERGROUND CONDUIT _ . ROUGH WIRING -- ~ NEW SERVICE _ ,.____. ____. __ -._ . FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. _ ~ G ' P TEMP. POW_[R POLE _ _ _ _ _ -- _,. _ ~f f-: _ ____. " (~ ._. OTHER _ _ _. _ OTHER ____ - -_ _ _ _ -_ -_.~~~~>._ %_ _ ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. , U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH. o~rn, Come ed, $vPPOrb. VmM1 - _. _ _ -- _ _ . _ _ FINAL MECH. P~uiec u°n _. Ymn, smm~xr ... OTHER I _._ ___.-.__._- _-____- ~ ___. _.-- OTHER _.-_` _ U.G.IUNDER FIR. So'I, wm.r, G°b SuPPVe _ _ _ 1 .... ~- wnr.,, car, v.mr. PLMBG RO ; . Sopp°M, Flmry~~gs ~ GAS TEST - I SEWER PRN DISP SYSTEM DIAGRAM FINAL PLMBG. P'~""`' v°I°.,, WATER HTR. v.m„v,mo, Preis Anl, Ynlrt - SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM i OTHER OTHER i I GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. ', _ B'~NDING -- I I ! r l ~nm..~° .on, .vAS PIPING ~ i GAS TE51 ~ HEATFP ,,~~„°`5n,1 °~~ I '~ vwAL Pcol. clEC. FIMAI. POOL PLMBG (..'HFc _ _ 'ruPf~ IIOn ~ DATE MSF SIGN ~~u oin~~ n' ~'s~ eiv o~ioN ~ ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga P RMIT E _ _ 9320 9aserrr=. Ma"chn Cucamonga. Ca. 91730 . Tel. (774) 9891863 Nc ~ Oon yecn Add"rmr. Commm<d, InJmmcq _. . Y« ewlerxy ~ _ 1 Aeeress Se,.raa I Z i, t NO ~ ~_ QrD ~ I4rz _ - Ovrlert cFn! hn Sw~ r b ' --- W Owner W . . 5 !Ae:eplcaet C V1 0. r ~ L Mailm9 Aeere55 N . u a maron _ . . ` /1 Qiv lip Ter J V i IxA eo I 3 ~ ~n~n ~~ i C2l . ~J~~ mracrm c s. _ _ w 5 ]~ o s, d A,<a rv<w ~ Aeeress 1 u cmd<,nar erdA. <" ~ - . SQ H bm rv<w W Cr1Y ~ W J vlc AuevorY BIdA ~ t n CF1 e Fee rt Ce ~ 1 LI dale ~m era No ~< .. n cia::n uo A<r ~ ` _ TOTAL ELECT RICAI FEES ~~ ~) W vaer+srn cmrenrtnBa nrrr^eal nnx Nc parogHOn I Na I Oer:npPOr p« A r._. ..Itr...r rru u. p. r.n r ra n r n. nn-n .... n.r ..rnn, .... r.. ~ ur .AJ '„ 5 e ' ard.r ~ .n. r. n m.; ar ..r rt.n im W ~ uo a 6 r rii IBp,BBC BTO ; rrr rnxnTln.v nx'nr',x xcru.r.xl . r ....... ...... rn. N ~- G'J aer % Poil<' Comp I '~BO em eTU +-r 3 nA '.5 xA i ' I r.. ~ t wr I A x~. ~d ~ o n ,,.r _ ~ .... ...,r.. ,. ,.. 4 , ~ r.. n w+ ~\ , n< ~ .l ~ V „nn.rvn u.e .., ,. Q V Po ~ A Y ler r,r i y ~rNb m Z ~ r.m ...,rrr ,.,... ~ A . r ~ r. ,....,. Q i e°~~ I = w , mr t~~ "'.,r L. mr.. __. -.- - ~ EC IAr ICAI FEES TOTAL M ~ o w'a r o<r p"' 1 v F I O a, I L ~ ,rr w O ~ .r . ' ..r 4 rm ~ U .rrx,,, . , rxrT. 1 . r.. r r.,. ,r,r. ,r:...... r t,.., .. , Z U .r.. ... .. ...... ~. r.n v,. .., ~.... . < . r . r r - ..r . ~ r, r. a.. r ~ .r pn. lr, .~.. tr< 'F• ~ A .. . n. .. J d rr rornL plun.461ra. FeES ' ' ~ ~ ,, '.~ TOTAL ELEC.. MECH., "'.MBG. FEES ,r C i ~~ e ~. .. , q ~ ,), ... .. ~ ..... ' -...-- --- --'-- p., VcFernon D. n. .... rn , / r rF n r r r.v, ~~ d nn~n, ace r r . . . I r0 ,r <n . o ,. r r .r n. n ~ i ~ ~ n, °n r . NOTES ROUGH WIRING ______ _ NEW SERVICE FIXTURES _ __ FINAL ELEC, INSP. ~ TEMP.~POWER POLHA/_„ OTHER -Y=~ U. G. DUGS/REFRIG. LINES .-~ _ --.._ --_ omn, come. u~, MECH RO . . uFp^rn, Venh ...~ .... ._ _ .... fAll/AC 11nn FINAL MECH I : ~„n, SnuroN,____ - _. ' ._ _ _ _.-______. UTMER _. _. __.. __ I I __ L_., __ ~ ___.. .. mo u r n rnrnco n o soil, warm, I I I RO. PLMBG wary;-c<;~wo?r _ I Suppnv Flmhmps ~. GAS TEST _ FINAL PLMBG p"r,,;er, v,l..,, I WATER HTR, rnr za `voi,~ SEWER/PRIV_ DISP. SVSTEM I ~ _ OTHFR OTHER GA$ UTIIITV QRNCE. 80NDING ~ U V. CVNUUIT GAS PIPING ma .~~', cep~F 1 GAS ZEST HEATi ~ r~.a,,,,,., ~r~ sl or! FINAL POOL ELEC. fI FINAL POOL PLMBG nTHER I y InISPECT!ON DATI I INSP. SIGN, SEWER; PRIV. DISP. SVSTEM DIAGRAM BUILDING AND SAFETY OeION ~ ELEC /MECH /PLMBG . . . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 932C ease!me, Rancho Cucaronga, Ca. 97 73C . Tal. {714) 389-7869 S32a4 Bw1a Aedren:° 7389 Hixdsdale Pl 5 ~ o,r,r,°„ Udd~n°° , Com ,ol. I°dvn..°9 °s- _. ___-. -- -_ . - "°-! Fee __ Z . s `< Lor 91ock irTCl 21 12670-4B ySU ~ -- ~ -~ - -- ------- ` W Mo ~ owlet, - ----- ,I o.°.r L,~wis Homes of Califo**+; ~ w _ _IR<:<m°:L, ~,, !sw~r[n<rl _ r _ _ ~ ~ - Mdrirng •ae hlamtain Ave 1156 ~ ~ - . - --- Ebro 1 ~ i - •_-- re55 F. . ~" °~°r, °i" upland "91785 'e985-0971 ¢ - ...-. l "° `°~ ~ ~ -~!- omo ~ .... ..L .--- O Comraner Ais NiailagefllP.tlt V ISPe<dy I ... . -. __ Ar 5 Fl N .. _ .._ I Atltlre55 Z89[] Uld, 1]dTtenS ee ~ x e° ew g. R<sdemmr Bldg C .__ V„ ~ c'r' Anaheim ~ x'92806 "^532-7590 ~ W S° it Me° New R„ A:re,r°., amn (? _ wareL~e 439296 C-20 ~'r ' ' 'l " ' v~.ak ~ IFF°°r.,eF.e b CIa55A C . NP ; - W McxnBrn .. r.. mn. rrx TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES ®r . n.r r .,, rm r I ^ m ~. r ,,,...,.,,,.. ..v rmr._,.... r..,. ... ., . ,. 1,or...'M~.,..,. iT:: .`'.. uv n..r,~°u°„ rF., n.«r,m;o„ ~ FAU to a ~„d:d ea d.., c=mm. ~ ' F,e - - 6) QQ ~ I I ], ' IOg,ppp BLU 1 r b InJud I Xv 00 sent ex r, xnir,a x s N ~. FAU C< BmIe~C°np, { n...., . r .... r ,m ...m., r,.. ,.. 1 r n ""'"'",• :••••• •• ••,, ,u1.... ....r:m Y i ltb 0(O BIU 1 °.er ] MO ro IS XP , ...n .,. .riWe, ,u ~ ~ ~ e ~ . Flr wm Bmn I 1 A^ H°..dler r° b Hn .,, ~~ ~ Ind°d. 10,000 dm I ,„a. - .a,. , < .. n x..a1 , ~,..,.,. , .r,w, u ~ r ~o[ Bo° ~ I A. °~dk I 'M1 Z ~r.mnmm.. r.r a. u.ri r,.,a. ... I km ad .<10 Hp tlm ~ . . Q a S r.r 1 w . ..,.,.., _.. .. 00 7 _ -- ~ ~ " 10TAL M ECHA llCAL FEES 19 OO ~ °~ F J .r F:a I n Fen . ..r .JL Sy m ' ' r ,C 015706 m,,,,, 6oldm Ea¢,le ins. F t r. W ~ e v N .. r! I p. '. } ~- ~ ° < ° VB • (a °. YYm ,. .,.' ,er, °„-. F.. ~ .. ~ ~. T('iAL cr',~M 81NG FEES C „r y^~ /~ /~`~ "" ' ~ "' T OTAL ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES 19 00 ~' 2b J(. Via :4~rtens r~ ~~"' k"P. ~ sP•~ 'C7 92806 ~ra~irin., Ca ' . ' _ _ _ .__. -.- P.r Ne a°.a°..,. ,~ ' e=',..,-.;'r.~ , ~I~ y°~ ., °1~..,n° n4 -,m.q P . ,B„n n-° „ry rme° n°-. d~om°d, n , r , . J7~ F;OP~ rvbk,r m ..°,,,, , ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,r, .,. ,,,,o,,.~., .r ,v.°e~r~.e o, n o~aon.a F°r ran awr ,: INSPECTION REC PECTOII N07E5 UNDERGROUND CONDUIT _ ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE - ~~_~_ - --~- -~ FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP, POWER POLE OTHER OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES _ ..._ RO. MECH. min, c°me. A.,, Suyp«n. VmM1 __._-. ... .. . FAU/AC V°~l FINAL MECH, W„M1 sn~mn,_ ~-~~~I vP~7 OTHER _.._. OTHER U.G./UNDER FLR. So~I' wOI"' ~ ~~~ RO. PLMBG. wm.., c°.. v<°I,~ ~ -"'- "' ^i,[ Gi SEWER; PRIV. UISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM GAS TEST L~ iii Y !J ._ F1NAL PLMBG. vo~~~.,. v°n.., WATER HiR. °`°' °`~'""' SEWER/PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM __ _. 1 -,. OTHER ~ ' Z« OTHER ~ ~ I kN' GAS UTILITY CLPNCE. r eor.DlNG .. GA$ PIPING' 'rmeoni. .;.m` i 'GAS iEST^ ~ HEATrv C4c°nn, ~ 1 \ nm. SFiir °ll I I INAt POOL ELEr;, i FINAL POOL PLMBG OTHEF INSPECTION DATF INSP. SIGN. BunOrnq Z AOOress RPr 21 w No Own¢r Mmiin , AOtlr055 OI 7389 HINSbALF. YLACF. eiocx *racr 12670-4 LEWIS HO?IES OF CA Y UPLAND ~`~°91786 ~~0~985-0971 O cO~~ ~~10°r E 5 D ELECTRIC INC. ArlmO:: 319 ?IC ARTHUR WAY Ill W CnY 2~P Lei UPLAiru g17RA , 946-2131 care cr . n 3~ 5 ~ J C-IO CnY E ~~~ - e cBa L< NP W ~ .vru=r:n mxrBBrt~ne nm. ..rn.m .n M r Q ...r -..n r .n e w ":...a r,,.r.~r.rr. r... •.n ... ~I Z c~j 0 V v R C ro a N Jll'II;.DING AND 3AFETY ION • city of rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cgcamongq, Ca. 91730 • Tel 171 d1 969.1651 PLAN 4-138 ^ r .n.. .w.. , .mR...mm rmm m, rXmrn mr. ,a..... ,.. ... m. na.. ELEf./MEfH./PLMBG. PERMIT Snrmn 1 I Is.,. IOOA I IReceproam L gM16, SwnrFm f••ror< __ Moron 1 / A C __ ', Inv =o. I orne. _ ISP<olY SQ. F,. Ar<v Naw Revderno~ Bleg _ _104_R_ @ .OI Bn p Arec Ye. 4R0 __ _. ~~ .005 Rm An.,,mY aieg . ._ ._ _ ._ ^ e.r I Fe Irwnna fee TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES No. ooo~Pne° No OnnrPr'on fnu m a d2: B ' o.,n.~iccF,P~....... I raa,ooo am '' „ a i~d~e. l XP fAV c.er ~ BoJe.'Compr IW ~ BN I 1 over ] XG ro IS XV X r~,: •••• ~ ~d ~~ o~aoa dm y a n' i A X d..r F ~,~ ad I e e o aro crm V<m Fan '. U~.m ~Wd ^. , ~ 5 00 -10_ 48 2 40 7 00 -34 8R- f« ~ plnn Cnl. ,,,a~.,. Fee r ~ I ......-._ ~-- -- - r .,r. r,. ,, ki[ w~rw r r ~ ~ r r M TOTAL F.CFiANICAI FEES . , r , „,. . r e.,r.,,... ~ oelr, p,~o~ fe. ... c s m r ~S 111 UII4R fi I r n ., , - l r . . ~ .. ', .n. C~j ,., > .~o. w Xeo.n . N A.~~ .rr ip,. sw sr0,.., Irvrp snr•* ,. ~, ~ .. ., ~ V, . I .. ., _. . ~ ,. w ~ Air-. ...rF., ~ I r .,,. .. .n .n.. ..r J r , va.. .e ` d IOTA 7LU MBING FEES ~" "' TOTAL ELEC. MECH. PLAIBG. FEES ~" '" ~ , , ~ ~~ ~ f.a..,,e, ' !'1 1~1L,_.9A_ 91Z+_ICs. _ _. -_ - v- .. "' ~ o re : J - ,~ ~ y _~ / _ j - ~' m r , /r. ,~~°' ..~ „1r . .I n . aaBd aBd ,.dr0m.e, aye ,. P r, r, ..e a e .a r . e.^1•~ ~ -~ .e m n . n.~nef vE ndoned lo, r40 aovr~ ,'' NEW SERVICE FIXTURE' TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER OTHER ~--~-~-~-~~ U. G. DUCTS~REfRiG. LINES RO. MECH, oea,, conic. Alo SuPPe!r,. Vmb _ _ FINAL MECH. Fewec umi ~ ~~ Vjnry, T\uraH, OTHER ___ -_..... ___ _Z.._ . .._ 11 r. 11 INDFR FIR SoJ, Weer. RO, PLMBG._ _ waf.,`ca~ v. a .- ~ . Tuppon,. FImA~~9i GAS TEST ~ - ~ _ ~ .-_ Fi.~.rt~ ver.n, i FINAL PLMBG. snra., 4 WATER HTR. ~~"`, Pd w,l.. ~.. ~ SEWER~PRIV. DISP. SVSTEM OTHER ~; OTHER GAS UTILITY CIRNCE Er~iv DING ' I u.G. COiv uUii ~ GAS PIPING n"r~.•„ ;.. Gi,S TEST HEP'EP ,,, ,~ mop I EINnI_ P~c;l ELEC~~ FINAI. Pn(JL PLMEr. ql ,R ~- NSI rTlOtl~_~ _..__ _.. .i_-__ __ __ _ ~+.noa -arES _ "~_ ~~ I `r - ` ~P/ ~ "~%c. ~1G~s~- CeT( I INSP. SIGN I Lot- ZI ~f~12, i~~o-Y N-~ Gtr Z. . BpILDING AND SAFETY , " ci~v of rancho 851 N° ~' ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. PERMIT euna~ny 7389 HINSDALE PLRCE '!~' ~- --'s"""' __ _ ~ Z Aetlmas Hatt __ ~, ISM:. _ ___.- --__. __. ____ __. ~m 21 eiocx 12670-4 ~owrts W Ne Rettplacur U9F0 SwtlcM1esl owner LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - - _ _ _. _ P„m..~__ ~~___~ __.- _ _- Mdilin9 P. D. DQX 67D ~ M°:°r ~ A()d:B55 ~ XP !a aw UPLAND ~"91785 ]`~ 983-0971 o,M1~, ~_ _ _ _ . - ~ISO•c''r _ . _____-_- O connar DWNER sP. Fr ArmM.-- - _...._ C_-__ __- _- - _ R.:~d..~~el elae I AIIO:PSa S9 FI Aree New . ie~ O Ref A<cetwq BIa9 IL. W cry Ln Y{ PI°n CFx _ ..___._ ~mOnce Fee __- ___ ow 9355 F- S~aie .~ 453B73-D lac Ho - TOTAL ELECT RICAI FEES - J 6Pass• iw W ^ 1 :.IfFNSf:n ~nNTRAM R.mn.~f••AM fln oln ~~^^' ~~ m, 'I RO~Im/Cem0' .nnn. .n.... m m ~emi..»+•~fa. ~' FAU re 6 mdud ro b indud, ] MP _ _ _ Q .a _ ~_^ '.W MO BTU - 4 a-e ] fnmor, _ _ __ ',FAG °Ir JHP io 15 HP .~. ~ Ip]000`BTU I ,ry°ndle~~ob ^~ w,~.m..mw,..m .. ~..~...~.,.:.,... ~.-r.,, :R. y 'Fi, w°n s..:0. I ~~d.e iBaw dm _ ___ A. Z /1 i.. ...m .., :, uur:r m. .... ~ Vn c^wd i.. wo~` \~ EZZppL Plar ("•x ~e Fee _ __ ____ ,.... __ -- ___'--- ~ !~ TOTAL MECHANICAL FEES Gar Srr em ~p..' .., ERTV MUl UAL P ~ ~ w~:, ~._ •,+ 162017086645 L.18 N ., , O . r„ U ~ .. „~ ,..~ ~' ' e..~aF.m 1 P...ace s.w° _ - N sF° , o.:n sre. V r ~. _ ~ , e s c ~ ~ 4 r e _ _li)lR 1 ~ ii iOTAI PLUMBING FEES i C ~ ,TOTAL ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES 17.66 R CL ,.~ _ '.~e ._--. e. `/~"SIC°Im°~,°. nm. w, .. ~,.... e...1,. _ u ~ LBO d r Y .. ~ _ .. ./. . ,I/el.m°.v ° "".... ~ ~: ~.,~. ~aed ra°ot ~doa.e%, °°%• we,eai m .m ° °° ~ -°n rF...n... . INSlFCEION OR NO7K UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE _ FIXTURES ~ ~ -~- -~ ~--~--~----~ _- FINAL ELEC. INSP, TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER __ __._._ _ _.__. __. __ . -_._._..... _. _.__-_ _- _ _ __ _ _- -_. _ OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES --_ Dace. COmb, AL. RO MECH --- __-____.. _. - -__.__.. _._.... _._ ._..___. ... ___-._- . . 5 °vvwn, vmn -~-- - _ FINAL MECH veu/AC u~i~ --- -- __ -__Ymh. Sbm°Ns _._ _ _ ._. OTHER OTHER __ _ __ _ ~ ~~ U.G./UNDER FLR. s°'~' Wo°'' ~ ~ _ _ G°,, SuPperM1 SuppwM1, flafAings GAS TEST SEWEPr PRIV. DISP SVSTFM DIAGPAh1 f"~°"'' v°i.n. FINAL PLMBG . V ~ L°w•,, WATER HTR. v.r.i 1 SEWER/PRIV. DISP_ SYSTEM ~~~/~~7 y /('IY O?HER OTHER I' I GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. °' BONDING I ~ iir rnr.ini ur ~ .,AS PIPING m°~<~•°~, :.c~F GAS TEST HEATER b ~ I ' ,,°„^^ 56° dl 4 7 FINAI. POOL G EG ~ FINAL POOL Pi.M BG VLHEP Ir SPFCnON DALE I INSP. SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ EIEC./MECH./PLMBG. c"~Y of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT wm oaa~r„ram, r....._._ __- o n -__ - __ emwma ~z.,t)[j iis~5 (;F:-.,,' sL~'f~' e.A('!= `," - No. i. s,arm_r e _~~ ___--' _-_._ _ Z Lddra J PIOex itael f ~ "]O ~. ` Oetlel+loclef L_9hM1 SwircFef ,_ ._.._ _._ -- Owner _ W NO ` ° 0 _ _ Puy /S i~.rr,., _ .. _. _-- __~ _- _ __ - Madrng , ~ - ~,, worms I Admess /S rcl ~ IP? .~_ °i~/ Y/7~ - ..jom.. _ _ __.._ _.._.._ -I -___-- __ O I Isv.oM _ . _. __... - .__ __ con acrm sa Fl, nraa N.w Renden4ol Bld9_ A0025s c ~ Si~ N Meo New _ _ ,{~ iel Rev Aaessery BId9 _ ~- - - - - W nn ~ Zia D a iA1 ~e ""Play <Ft it n+„a,« Re.... _ . _. ___ 51a~e , /z Inc Nn 7pTAL ELECTRICAL FEES A r' l Pa. W 'dvv V. 1~ R`nT0R 8"~Ff..A0.; flnFhr imm nd mr Ni ~ Der[/~p10n M1'a Da1(n01 :On _ - ~~. , ";I "pmwr„v.~r.n, iAU m 6 inJvd 'Bode, fomvr, Q ~, ~n.~.,'e a rV r r m 6 IndvE ] MP _ 1p5,0YJ 91U t FAu = ru . r'' Iq p'~BiU ]HR IS MP ~I _ ~ ! m h LJ I ih w u s~rp ~~ d t~a~ao0 do ~_ ~ .. ...~ ...r^. .. _ m .. ,~..~....",...,~.....n ,,..r, ,., •7 ~ >R,. ,,., I ~.. la o0o nm _ r . ~'..,. Y Ir.o~d ' Z °i '6m.r _ _ Z ~ .........r , _. B .. r r r. M-. ~ I ~ ~wd e , err... n ~r.-..___.. ---_ ~ ~ TOTAL MECHANICAL FEES ...N .r v W •.a ~ ol.o" ier _ fir] V ~ .~ V l~L F~~ ~ ~~ v .,, e4 / ' µ ~ n O . r~ L ~ " ~ ~~ =~,.:d~ , n =,~.:m U .., ~ ~ , R, r 3 .~ .~ .. m ~ :.,, I C ~, r' "' •" vl 70t AL PIUMRING FEES ~ ~~ TOTAL ELEC., MECH., PLM6G. FEES ,~a ~ v, r. ~',' r , ~ . ~O~Q "~~o% and ,olyd0r<d, ,m r Lao ~a n.e rx r , ,~ ~• r •.. /-°^rn, o4='~mn -e r " ,r ,~ r rm ...>d ,n,r'~~.e m, lea oarr UNDERGROUND CONDUIT "'~' ' ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE FI%TURES _~~- --~---_~ ---~--^ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWEP. POLE _-_ ---- ~ ~~~- --- OTHER OTHER .... .. ... . _ ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE.J U. G. DUCTS(REFRIG. LINES ovate. Comb. Nr, --.-___ __ __ ... . _ _-__ ______.-___ ..... .. .__ RO, MECH. s.oRah. v.°h _____ _ FINAL MFCH. feu/e< u~ii - ~ ~ ----- -~' -' ' OTHER OTHER - .-_ ___ ._. ... _.-- bil, Waln, U.G.(UNDER FLR. ~, s~oc~h ~' RO. PIMBG. wai... w., v.m, SaVFOm, Flov6mbv , -~J i~/ _.... . GAS TEST ~ -L~tJ'L ~/~~..// fINAL PLMBG. r°~°"`' °01"'' C/~if WATER HTR. 6..~, bai.~;; _ Frm, Sei Voive SEWERIPRIV. DISP. SYSTEM I .. .. ~ -- OTHER 4 OTHER -_ _ 1. ,AS UTI IITY CLRNCE. ~ ~ . BONDING I I r rnninl ur ~' '' GA: PIPING uve^vi. 0•r° ~ i '. GAB TEST ~ HEATER `~` "`' ~anm on i ' Fi`;A I. POOL EL!~ IiNAI POOL PIMBG. ~ , UiHFR INSR CTION ~ DATE ~ INSP. SIGN. SEW ER'PRPJ. DISP SYSTEM DIAGPAM ~UN~pING AND SAFETY ~SION city of_ rancho Cucamonga Ea._ sixL Y'°°r 12670-4 _ No. 21~ - ~---- --------___.. ~^'^° Lewis Homes of California _ __ M°~I'^e- -P. 0. Box 670 _ _ _.._ ~'de-= -~ 3~p - r`'' 985_0971 cr Upland 91785 c°^'^^°°' Owner T 1 I..~ Z O v y~ Ly ,V n N Iry -..____ ._ iP r<I. TT _ 1 .- -- __ __ on 9555 "°~° CI°' 453873-B L¢. ~+° _ _ L Cimnl_ _ __. -- - - -- 4cM1., EnOr., Owner _ _._._- DnlBmr_ _ - ~ Y<I, - Aae,<„ Same h____ ' - 1iv IYpu Gry ~ Lc Nm ~,"P°"a„ Single family res. Plan 4-138 _ Livable 1,046 _ - _ Garage 494 " r 5°'f' Porch 19 IS ~~., 1 ; , 1 T s.:. N<. wY Aea I .'. A r<~ • BUILDING PERMIT <. wd UmR 111 AIN kdl°°m_ ~ Sae >pprw C'~ ",, oX ~1 _ rfla ro.N APP'm.d APP Er Dlv. /~~ fire Dut. _ e- __ ~~~ S vV vAluA*IoN L O N PIAN CMECR ~ _ n Y ~- PfRMIi ~ F DRAINAGE E Credlt - -- -- ~ • E srsl:+,s - I p f. tlf. S _ . B. e. rredif. 1 ;,.d ',~ ' sl .; EM N nNPnRS rnYRP Anne r r1.nxAr:~rN ,.. ..~, P, , ~°i~~~_1620_ 11'JgbOgS ,(,gyp,. Liberty MUtuah NTIiInATR nv FSF.MeT11NX iR Y Im n.. NnRPI0..4µNPi: R1u5AT,nN d'/rV RNA. N..I ddN.. ~110^I n •~~ ~ n IA. •o.oln.mn•e a: TeC~^rL fve.'~AuM1 Y,B..mnr• "xe,..t u`~0 M' _ °in' ...re ..m . ,..I r. r...n __ _ _ _ pr. F.Itr,~ll` „I,IrN1.R' TN~NBi PI+['iRIN*I. F.A .,A. o.rln.m.nn I ~.In. • Adl. f ~I- - ~`In.~ ~~nMld 'rl Pan.tun~n: rAp°I nr'A. r 0 nvd°6 yy~o e"- N•i~in< Ad.l..~ i 1 nQ ra gty8~_ .,'. PuN Tln~-,~ IAC6N.CU ,nNTRAttnN'9 BfI,.,Pa,IIN 1 r .qo,... ,.I, i .m v...oi n°.7 e' °-r ,I i,,:n°'.°;d~.'L.L ..a m, ®u:~, 4 ~.":.v Id,... a :7i.:,' ,.~r.:.^ -- -- t~ uRRBI~I f~PR nYr ~.ANATI~~V -- u IMbv~.<Bm non : Mme. r.rd~-.I.. Ir n' n n,~gvn noln,. ~r •P.n ?ulm rA "µa n.r r.. a nnl n Nv ~ +~~ nn.. I nn .~. n...l • .. I,n i ,Rr _- ni.u rAni n. ..r ,.'JO±A^ v rn'MII ". n n•«AI.Ire,ri ri. ...1.. ©~' iu •~ nr ur rA. ~.rnNn, r'~d. I ~...r In. ~ Ir ~~~rA n..nl.ndn. i., O ~ R .1' I 1...:Ai. i..._.n .m"..,o .,..B. Lewis Hornes of California ~. ~ ------" - -- °.d °rd .old°Ya n^d ., wni<n 1° m., .. ° M1,,,. rR P.,md.R.^ p,°p<,liTi n.d pa , wo•, rb.mndr. ° ^ol ro r<rd v ~ rmprd<d o °B°rd°n<d lo. IBO dop <.nlr°eo^ .1 . f ~l; T,~i. COPS INSPECTION RECORD fOUNDAiION" IGr. Rnrl Cemp, ioh. Setbooh. ' SLAB/1515., GIRDFRE MmF, vap Panmr. fIOOR Hkp.. Span,, A„ert Yenh, - Imbr. _ MASONIY Reinl. Morw• Jh. Gmm Llh. ClavaOvh. Rolb. _ h--- ---JJJ ROOF SNiG Kaibeg, piopn Blodmg, Mp!<r.ol -- Grad< aid Any: , ,, Aool wa~~, ERAMINC. wvln. RaFf, J,n.. er«Lmy. ero,mp. rvadmR, ea,kma D~aeb, Dan smp+. _ INSULATION '~ in<v„ F~Volo•v, Fipmg, Sound ~aa,mp. L--~ FIREWAIIi~ Malsivl, iAdnm Dampen, Doan, -- - Claen, Funbl< bob, _ _ _ - _ 1 INLEAIOA. IAiM/DMY WALL Hcd"nc. SL'pWlry, li lap; loam Reml _~~ EXiERIOF UiN: EIp NG MnF, Fnor^en Lopv •_ __ __ Foper, iM1r<4net,~ BocY~ng f INAL vl'FPf-irON (inivF Gr~d~^c 1:•:ril ~ .~~. A < rv on^o I [^o Neu ..mb<, Wa'+rAn 5~ I Gr. ~. _ \ •~ INSPECTION NOTES SWIMMING POOL/SPA I .__- .. _ -_ _-___ __--_ ExUV :'~NF vrbccA, s„a~,:: I ~ _ In•nn P,.,4~ v rnu,i MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ BUILDING city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 4as~1ine, Rancho Cummon a, Ca. 97730 • Tel. 17141 989-1857 Bu'rldmg / Ne, r D f.---. _ _ ___ __ i Comr ___ _ __ __ Gro.y lvl ~ ~lYlo(Y Trvcr -~~ 0[[ -'~NO. Dw•, U D 1 D<s. Yer, W NY._ ___ --_ loDa .-_.. _ orn<1 - ..-- - -9-~~-~----- ND ' ~a~'ar.. - la.<. <,m. _ I,<YD_ir.d ~_ ~~~ffrG Bedwvmr AVN I Size Mvil~ng -_ ...- oYpraved ~jr' Aaldrm ~__-~-/-'" _~ `^` iel. ~_-_- _- :Ian O~ ILL~4~K~E°9 Dm _. ._lfm Dirt___ 5veeel ~V O C Naclo~ ~~ "Y _-~ _ ..~~~?~~~ CD.dmnm _.- __ - -__-_ - __._ ...- ~w2•sQJ 6CI 1- N, D amL rY 3q/'f1 G- --_-C S~4_ C+ rIAN qn K srar. lr(. .~ y3~ C1yl x ar9nm ~ 1. .. Nx4 GbAi/""<~~ DF0.M{i Addre .. //- lt~..~ ___ . i. f~.2 (_C.'c .N-~ F J.A14At.E !CrGLj i/h3"]~9l 1 _ _~l.<1<NO._ E I15rEMi co°Dr~non 5 ac.r~r,. 1 ~ -vim r. ~ i - _ uo~.~~C ~C- vneA Z ~ '- i~- „~EF 1~ ~~ p s,.Er.3 ~- ,..: ~r.~.V~•-.- D~'yy ~slran..;...D,.=, 4 - ~~ 0 Sze ~'~'' lyr. .: ,.,~. 1 r~ ~ V. ~ TOTAL I ' a < o ~: D p L L 1 1~ J ' 1 II~~ 11 pl 11!~]iJ Y A I N AN ' 1 L~~ 1 - O O } f rAn i~ MI 111 N(IN ~' f .~ LN rl N V ~ r n '1 rM rl .Inlbrr rn 1 f rA I ri ~~~ ~ 1~ 11, M I r rlrnA M n e ^ . . n . ~^•1 n r.1 - " f L 4 r r s xff; ~ „1.. r ., ~ fir n_ rr I yyy n ..1 .. 1, Arlry/r'rdr r :uun 1. nni.' r.d nn , ~ M .• r -~ <r rr n( nDl.t{~~Yrk_0.1r?~.f~~ Nrilin< A.IA.w rAlt 6 v bwldin9 Or:mn .M1r~ OruPe9Y Irllea vvl n n<O v l d ! a , g .o y r v , v~Y a rvble(I b r ~ 1 Ir. .,o.,m,an .r „a,t .. <,~aDr ~, .o...,.. •a D.., ,~raDnam o, an,,.,ron<d l01 rea aaY[. , ~ INSPECTION RECORD - ' fa/ra~AnoH Ic: r,...l ~c-P .<... s«n,~.~ I INSPECTION NOTES ..~ for ni ROOT BUB b5i0. ?~ ~~^~ i~ApEA? v,r ' .-'r r_ ______-.____-.-.._.~-__ MAEONRY Re,^I 4m•^ 1•v. Grcf i'v i Clore Oor~, e..rv . _ _ _ _. .. ROCF Su1G : n p'c r-r. a.. I ~ ____--_ n'c ^,n FRAM WG 'No-v e,° Ivr... 9 aq -•. 9n::: ~ ._. ..._.. _ _ .. - _ _ ... _ -__-__- _ _.. ._..,, ._ t _. INCIIO~erlOrl !a vv ,.r F,+^a 5: .^a / FIAEWALLS b[mn ^.' ~ -nnexv ..~ .,. r ~ v ~ I ~. fm o;. ~ __ _.. IMERIOR lA!>' nR' wA.l t. a, :,rr.. Lapy Jor : Re~^ r ' i E%i~AiOV IA's i:•r.G v.-,- :,r....,r ', ~.-. '. - - _ _ _ _ - - - .____..... ._. . -- _ _.. ..-.-_.___.__ FlNA'. '.r.EVrn.iC r: F- ~ I mcn .. .. r ,. ., e : Yw r ~ '.ti. ~ - li E.n )o. 1. .~,., ~ _ ~ __ _ .. .. .. _ __._,_.,_. _..__ I ]WIMMIRU YUUI/]YH '~ ... _.. ._. _. LTUV [irttr w!B/:CKi 4ad.~n ~ unq, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, LE+Y~ ~ Snr. .. ' , o. v I nlln_ M1:: ': ~ : ., MISCELLANEOUS cven• '~. I I I l i I BUILDING ANO SAFETY ~ioH ~ EIEC./MECH./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 7 863 FJ3pn ga.'S1ine Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 • Tel 17141 989 ' I-_ ao e<,:,or ~. raedro.r, com.._.. _ _ a~eac55 nee /N i. ~ ser is.:<«r _ . I ~ Lol ,~-// Brock iracr '/ Z ` 'z W . ' Ou'I F I W Ho.~Q ^ nl _ -- IP•,eo odo LgFr~ Swnc MmxnB y '. moor /'~ AUeress ~~. '7T L Z'P tee z ~9 IHe eo I 1~/~~ r a / ~ ; // ' l . 11 L:J~ (.,.s[l,.C. Q l! . /~ ~I , J __ OrPe, y j / " ~ISp.a~lr 11 t~,_- ~, V` t~ comoc:Or /S ~ sa Fl nrm a<. __ noe<ess ~ J ~O C ~~ ~23 V _ a<:~a.m~al el_e_ se it n-<o rr.w (o zi , ~ ~ .. e., n:r<,r~r, Pia, ~ W ,r, ' ` care L:c / 6 uaeen a~ Cnr ~ I ''0 ~O r Fe< , _ ("L TOTAL EL@CTRICAL FEES r 7 W I.rCFNalx r'rINTRA(TIIP; xiF: ^PYT ^ Alo pq,rrpl~en I h'0, pef<'~pxOn f<e _ 1 f an. f.tlr .M mr r M. n , ^^ e.. ~ ~ pr < FAU o 5 edi~a . ~ P : C pr x.. r rr. ^ ~ , $ ,,, $ $$ F fAU om p 5 r•Y T WOOD P~U ~ ^ ^• r r~ r, .r..r. „ , _ i V f VVI f f }~1 I fl. W-0 Sm0 A I', mn Sm or.n ~.. ... ^. .n ~.„:.,n..v R~ . ~ ~ ~ M~~ ~tir ' 51`~r ^~ I . „mv ..m ..r .. ..r r wr rnrn u~ U ;r.,r.,..~ ..Ri' < I ~ ,,,a ~' , ro 0oa , I ,uo: n n r Z Q r.m ...mr, ..:.r r. .I r r.~^..... ~ ~ or ^i .a r„~ ~ ~.r~,a . n., .,... __ .___ _-rr...r..__-------.. _ ~ tOtAl MFC HAPJCAL PEcS ~. .,..1 ~: ' r sr ,.~.. ^. ~ r ~ i l~ : ,ern en ~ ,"I. wo•m I v .r A" .. m .. r. ~ ~~ I ~r ,~ r ,, , , .. .. ~ . _ . ~.,., ~r _ _ < ~ ~ r ~~ ~~~ J d .• /' I ~ ~ "' ~~~ ` - I iOfAl PLC Id KING 'ELS N .: E °' ' - P' MBG. FEES ~ ~ ICY MECH ELEC ~ u n.c ,... ~ y~~ ~ ,c ~~ r ., „ TOT ~ sfrf ~ f ~. .,, c,.a a P r v. rr..~ -- - _.. _ -__._ D ^r,r oe,, voLalaeop _ ~ Q .. Pl o . ~i.LL _'- __. _._ ._ rop•dr L. cal nJ e~ "d rrxdn:<a and n Len Thn e o ro i rd „ u /m~~ ~: r =d n. +hu~aoned mr d0 dr: . rri ~'I ~,'Jr1 ri : UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ' ROUGH WIRING ' ~ -_~-- ~~__~_-~ ~- ~~- NEW SERVICE _ ~ FI%TURES __ __ __ __ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE OTNER OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CIRNCE. U. G. DUCTSI REFRIG. LINES ov<n, cocomm. eG: __._ MECH RO __. _-__..._ . , _.__s.pporn. vmu FAU/A< Umv FINAL MECH ( . vmn, snuiox. ! __ OTHER OTHER ._. 5a'~; worm, n.-. iurJncR FIR _ . C . - ._.__- __ .. __________. __ v«n~._ _ w~u., ca RO PLMBG _ _ . _ . - . SYppOtlt., fmM1ingv ~ GAS TEST I SEWfR~PRIV. OISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM FINAL PLMBG. f."~°"'' v,wm. Seraae~ WATER HTR, v:~~, v„i.,,, _ <51~ RBI VCIr! ~ SEWERI PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM I 1 OTHER I OTHER l ! GAS UTIIIiV CLRNCE I BUNOMG I U.G. S.uiJDUiT ~ ~ 1 GAS PIPING uo~n.,i o.~.. ~iAS tfST I NEATER ° ` ~ n ~r,• ~ sr „r o l ~N~~ POUT FLEC. FuVAI POOL PLb4BG. rcIIFR ~~:SPECTIOnI DATE I ~NSP, SIGN, BUILDING AND SAFETY ~sION ~ EIEC /MECH IPLMBG . . . • city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 93YG•8aseline, Rancho Cumm a, 91730 • TeI. p1b1989~IP51 Boilerng ~ No oa m (Aadmo cpm `pl, Indmmap ~ - - - -` -- Z acme:: IX I r~ a ~ ~%. s.,. a~ [ol BlocP nom ~ Ise,. ( _ _ ~.o _-- ; ow ~~, a '_ ~ --- ;~ ot ~ ~ rl.,.,^, `,_=.r e, ~0.~,a i+E~ ~,-•~ Mdi ~nq Reu:e~: •F i ,m ppyl~G+ Aaorex, ~' IC ! G Cf ~" '-" ~ . - -- t w 'Ma,,,F.~ ~ •j ,.,..,. •= p .. __ ~- -- - y '( r~YIC 2'1'l -pJVI~I ESL W S¢ PIC/((P Nl'^ ...e # (Ci 8 S.nAeA1 ~ biea~ ::oc,;, yu cG _: .1. 'G - C; - - - - - ~ / -- W , , F~ Area Nro 5( cer~!of~b Yl r]~y Ire,~c~7 c.~~ x, , aloe, , "=-E 4'{ ~ ~ Plan CF4 ~ ~ gal ,,~ I [.w e Fee nr.F„r (O~`IJ ,r. N <rt't~~G l! Fn _ -~ - W :-./ urF:.venr ora'rxennPP nal..PPnnnly ~ j TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES No ~ Der[rrplrpn Flo. Dercrrp, n nlPmr rnl ro it jd;ii e~ :rn ~i .rvr ~~ F~ rr n' P~w n Fn_ Q u I u . m .~ • .rr ., ..~ . s 1,- ~~.iu _ Ipp,pp B U P 8 CIA 3 IIP _ ^ 1 P!Y FPU Ba 1, C c ~ p: ' n ^••• '. .. P• ,. p I I~ M(I B U I ] XP IS HP O Flr Wn a a r v v Boo A r Nmda V ., ,r •° ..•.• .~"°• ,• • •••• '"' o Z a .. J 000 d~ ... ,ter„ m.., .. x a r r , m...... E.n.on - f pre Fp .. .IVi Co. ' r P..a.. CL4 c. var I _ __ t4 __._-_ ~ F ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ __ TOTAL MECHANICAL EES , ~r,vr .. rr x.x, r~ . .: ~. .~-: ... i r 0 p,p. i ~ D o. a. Fen > i" ~ I Fee . I o P [ 1 ~~h~~ 1 ~Lr ~ L .i.l _. ~ J. I r ~ ~ e . p' m ,/ v H \J V N i L_ n .:hr ~ r 5 I ~ _~., ^. ., ~ ,•.., .. ~~ • P IMEING FEES r ~~ ~ ' ' ' v r' ' "~~' r~'.. "~ " ' 70TAL ELEC., MECH., PL .1BG. FEES ~l `! a t ~ r.. ~ ;, . ~y t+~.~~~ ~1~~; ~ r, ..., .. .. •` A f ' ( ~ / yea'/,-+= ...._ ,. (_[.l~C t-_ ~ _ .. .~~,J' ` mr .. J't., D ~ ~ t L ~'' ~ D.~ J . Ixt •n~"./ne 4P'[:/~".mf-p~......rm PpOr.~~lp/d r9n•I rnd .ulravlad onA rl r.b,cl p n.~ o~ , .c. rx... :. , n --• . ~ 1 wmmdep o: na-~denetl lo, IBO aon, x INS-ECTION ROUGH WIRING I F NEW SERVICE -_. _ _ FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. -- - -------1 -- . __ _ -- TEMP. POWER POLE __ _- ._ _ _ .__--j _ __ _._ OTHER 1 -- __ _ _-__._. t ____. .. OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES - __- °°rn, c°me. nor. RO. MECH _.__ - -- 1 _ - _ _____ _- _ - _ - - -.~ . _ pvvan.__..r. _ __. . i FINAL MECH. pAU/eC u.n __-. _ ___ ... I _ YMR Shurolh OTHER OTHER 5otl' w°"'' U.G./UNDER FLR . Gm, Suppan wm.r. car. v..n. =~' RO PIMBG , . Suppae, FlmMngr GAS TEST FINAL PLMBG. '"'"'' °p1 "' _ so.w.r I i v.~r,. vob.r. WATER HTR ~ ',, . p,. u. ad ,,... ~ I i SEWER/PRIV. LISP. SYSTEM OTHER ./~-(~~ ~ ~j97 JJ~ /~ ~ T OTHER I I GAS UTILITY CLRNCF. BONDING ~I . r r..,.~~i crs PiPmc ~°Ir ~.,„ i I on<', Tur . _ Htnrv~ ° ,~"sM1~"„ '•~ p^.rl PO~a siFr a i I. _ ._ .- SEWER PRIV DISo Sv$nM DIAGRAM • BUh~DING AND SAFETY DIVISION ELE[./MECH./PLMBG. - Eity ~of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9370 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 • Tel (714 9891851 No ! eaaiprmn IAdd~n_L Commerr~ol, Induvrrioll Pn Wilding - o.... ~~. s <.r mia~ n., .~ ,Im.l_,,, madi.q .q P'_ _ ___ __ _ _ oy. r. AearnP_S~y '„!-- _TZip... ___. rl.--„__ __. _ T T~ ~ .. <i i T-. ., r t ~ fY Cyfo ___ ___.. _. N ~levm _ Carom or -- O pro. -N[f, ._. PL.~I.R Pe ___- tome, _ ._.. _,_;, I ~.~ _. //~~ ~ _ Ad /`~, 5 Pr. Ana Ne. ~. Gt£4a ~,tR.~_L ~ g ~ I ch lap rrl. !- xrt,a.mml amy _ C~ I rj'rf_ xcv.w...9-...1 R./7~!_ (n.Z?rY54 }. V sa. of Ar~k"sE+ . <: ~._t-~atE = ~~~~ Slole Lc <ny .J 4o AenuorY Bldg ~' W 6 Claud. [~ G ~ Lc. Na W Plon Cn4 v I It v f« / art:. c:n rnvrn Fee wnr' I u 1 ~ arTrxa m./un.111n~ TOTAL ELECT RICAE FEES W ® rn m,~ ~..r.l , m. r n, x~.m...::e "i ,r..,,., ..L .,. m. ,t,. I... I,., r , r~.tx•rlorv _ ~ No . PAIi~~ np~,~~~a ~ No xo~.~~cemp~ Pnl ~/ ` NI ~ wu;gearut !I ~ e -rut aw I /~ of I PAU o as le carp, i .,. u. 1 W,p'JO BN e~ 3 NP ro IS XP n .^, ~~~ .,... .,o- rPb Woll Smp ~ Ar HrrJ e, •o6 el In ... I 1 ,,, .., i ,. n ....~ ., Q 5G ,I &aro'e/ I I A X 0 WO ' E o a and I I 1 .Im .~ Q lod Dar ~ ~(/. /~f v P~°~ `mot ~ 'ftun..~ fee I ! v.._..______ _. _... .___ __ W .. '<r „Nr. ,rl., ~ TOTAL MECHANIr AL FEED . 2 ^ ~ ~ . o, ,... .. _ - ._._._ ~ .., .~ C p. vor r W N N x 5.. V .~ ~ ; .. ._:. }. .. ~ d I .... ~ TU1At PLU MIi I',G FEEc t TOTAL ELEC., MECH. PLMBG. FEES] ~1 'L' cue tlr~°'3 t~' is l ba ~~_ P. o,.unl T7 f,Js rr.~ . .s f!7o,1 (/p ,I~a ~ /'2~ 7-rL- ,,,,,,,,,,~~~~~ir ._L v . In,i ' , Jol rmr.:.~, ~ prom .e„~ n„p.rry ~~od apl.. ..a^od o~d vnl.lr le?^ n n i •tt,~t.i I' •rpirpl nn 'I •n~l ~ ^'le• '~ curl onder! ~nr INl ,In, r I` 'E~.FOR OPY i ~ LNSrsrnoN RECO~ ~li+srecra Noes UNDERGROUND CCRJDUIT _ ~ ROUGH WIRING ` NEW SERVICE ____. _ FIXTURES ___.._ -__-.____- __. FINAL ELEC. INSP._ --~ ~~~~- ----~_ ---~ - -~-- TEMP. POT'/ER POLE OTHER OTHER --- _ ---- ~ - ~----^ ^~-- ELEC. UTILITY CIRNCE, U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES _ RO. MECH. oum, cant. ~i,, ___ _ FINAL CH. Pau/a urn --- -- - __ OTHER OTHER -_- _.___ __, 3 ~ ~S /J `~Y U,G./UNDER FLR. sae, wars, .-_... - RO. PLMBG_ we~~,, oae., vemr. ~ SuPCOnt RnrA.nSr ~ ~ P~/ d~ `=. GAS TEST __-_ SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM FINAL PLMBG. f°r°"~ °o1ve' ~ ~ ~ __"v«,r val.., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~J ~~ 5 `~ :/ . , ' WATER HTR. v,.•, x.r v„I•e J ~ . ~ ~ _ ~~ SEWER/PRIN. DISP, SYSTEM ~ ~ v J OTH ... 44 I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ / y E-~Z`G /Y~%/CC.~J LXFY IA'~OB-TL7_~ ~~ ER - i OTHER ~ _ ~/~'G ~-rii.r GAS UTILITY fl RNCE. ! BONDING nr ~nnini ur iwr _._, _.,..__., i I; SAS PIPING rn°~m~~ er„ I .. 'a GAS TEST i ^,^ HEAIFP ,r°. °~sn°~iroi~ ~ I t ', FINAL POOL hLEC. FINAL POOL PIMBG ~ T)iHFR INSPEC110N DATF. INSP. SIGN. - ~ RDING Altlp SAFETY ION • city of rancho cucamon Z Rane'~„q .2~' L 1_ JliMil.Qei!- W_V_!c Addr<„__ T k im<r , Bla l c e I W No.. MK ~JO rAOilinq ~ _ _. ~O~f'~Z.~C'_ ~^ _ cry ~ zip ~ ~<I~~ ~`u O l~ _ co~Ge<rer - / -' Q _ . -- -- - ~-- - J Aearcr, - - W I> y ~,„ r~ \ / $rela L[ b Um,d. Gey o Lc ~ W AraM1, E~qr.. Detiq,er AaA...r Ii~l ~. ~„ ~ , ~,. ~i ~ , S~ ,.e : Gr4A,~ ~ 'aCE•f U•6~ '~ O4 ~ s:.~ CkW j~.: .. 5 A ~ L .. .. ~. ... O I V ~. '. , C a ~ ~:.. ... ., r. n ~ C~ C ,~ i ..,r .,'n . ,.... v J . ..... .n, r ~ r ,. .. ...~. y .. ~ ~ . .. n Q O ~ ni ~ i i. __ T Wv ~~ _ r..... ~~~ ~ BUILDII~~ • PERMIT vo trr< oa. ,r r.<, ~ Cansr _ _ Gm_ey _ ]:c. - ~ -~~l+e D. Use Pnme Dm, Re+. oaA I 'J•~b Reao'red ^ Renuircd ^ Va ~40~ iiEp j APN ~.a~ee-, I s~,< j swo Aoor, ~~ v c A„e, u; j P o Aym ^- .~o n.-APy~ ^ "<ap~red ~R<4 ~"cd RpGw<e A<oulr<e on,~l b'5-762 'i'~sJ~D ~+.5-83 Fem. P:JAiION $ R:AN c4'~rRR~~p (~.~ NOF~I r i ~ ~Y f ~4NtJ fd FEE.... R' p r~ ' n P\~J ~ (( r t~~t,,l~a e `°f~t";i:4`.: I;o,~t 3 ~' _I n 5 BEn U'I°ICAnow rR RPRR~~,4'....~~t~..} .. G:,,.:R I t l u~ ~k ' O \ . in ... .. . ' .,.... ..,~, i. ., ., m, i. a.. e, Ars MJe~^q veml w,~^ , , Id .d o mn .nlen~~^.i, and i r~Li•'1 to rehoro d rvo ~r . r=~ ~, „i nmTee......, . +~d ~ iFoalnnaA '~ In0 d w ^• • INSPECTION RECORD • P'' : - rAwNpAnoN Im. GerriE. camp unt, s.rbaar' ` INSPECTION NOTES Far- Rdc „ -. ROOR SLAR/IBiS~, GIADEAb Mmb, Vap Born'er, MLg.. Spent .k«n, Venh, Tr Imbr. MASONRY, RdnE, Mar!or Ih. GroW Llrs, CleamOuh ¢oh , s. ' AOOf EHTG" NmLng, OvvnM1 Blo<Fng. Marenol __ Gade and Aba4ness Aool Dro.nt .~ +. iRAMIN0. W lh R 0 hh Bl d B A mg, m[inq, a , c ., o ~ .1 Naffing, BediriB, DicpFr. Pol! Sapt. _& INSI1lpION ih¢kan!. R~VOIVm, Piping, Sound Cau141nB. fIRFWAtlS~ Mormial, ih<knns„ Domp<n, Doon, Cle.en, Fmi61. bah. ' DA LF- NTnq. SupP<rh. d ._ J ~~ i /~y ,- St'I4"tom 16421 lapt, Jainr R<inl. ~_~~ . S _ .. _ E%TfRIOR IATM/SIDING MaF, fattener; to ~/C-.n-- Qd/lltj( ^'-_~ bpeL TF¢knut. BarFng. ~ NNAk Ih'BPECIIUN" f.nnb Gmm~g Cnnl , Slope - - ~ -. ... _ _ - flen!., 'n<r99 Compl Card Povred. Coq A..rvv Rre Doorq Fnh, coaling Dev<u, land.•9v, ~ ( (' ~~ lj 1, (,E ~-"~'~ Xwre Numbers, Wea!M1er E+r~ppin9, Pl rE+gr, ~ ' Clec SWIMMING POOL/SPA E%CAV. RfR:F. SFiBAC(S podim SH 0<nd~•o Erp. Sod Rnmc tc.. 5v-'range _ __-_--.__ __-- __ - _. _-____-. _--- ~ _ fENCfIGAi ES Hach Cbaev, A-eu b~~ry, _ ___ _ .. Emden. 5!ebibh I ~ TINA, m5Pl C'GN MISCELLANEO US SAPAV pAlrl" PCOIN _ I- . _ . .. .,. _ - ~~i i ..i.ii____ _ .l 1 II I 1 VEhEi9 I + AF .G' i SIGr4' _-__ ~1{ _. _. __ ..--.._ + ._.__ -_ J - . i!i5f ~'.'IGN I DAif I INSP. SIG!:. BUILDING AND SAFETY ION /MECH /Pi `~ II ELEC MBG . . . . city~-of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 91736 . Tel. I7t 41989-1863 enemy r i, r / / L ' + ,..,,,.,,n, c~mm.,~„1. mr,~~l„na °'° r.< Lol Bi0c4 T•acl S¢e T~ I~ 0 A Ow+m ~ 4 YJ W H 14enPm<lo bynq, S.nd<rl Maniny //JJ /J A ~ I 7 `~ Y r. tlt iP55 FI/J.7^ J IA I Mol -a. 'ri .n O Gio~ TO uPc.i..-off _ R'7~ T~9Yr~3r?.l ~ MP~~ ~ I to,A ~ -- -6i ,__._p.- • Can' Spe<Fly ' ~ ' ~ U4- - a 5 F~A~e ,N.w 4 AOtlress , [ d fl }"' `~ H U w ~de Fei tlo' ~ ~ t ~ L J Cil1 ~]iu Te J so , .~ Me., t'I. ~ALt}y~'ryBldo < ~ ~ [A~ % / ia I 1 ~ W r Sage 1~~ n Plon Cn4 ~.~h~oa^ro f~v~. ~/~ ~ ~-~ UJ TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES /7 ou W Lve.F.a, ~,,.,rxv a.~rn..a.Tn'u ~ ~ ° a„~. i n na m o f . Q ~ r n. n ~.~,... ,n, r.,r...~,~. r......1 ., ,o o m<no «m e ... - W iAU '0 6 uE Bo, r Camri 1. N e.p ~0 6 InJntl 3 r~ . ^ ~ nxxm i.~n~u i..n uin .AT ^ ~fAp o.i ~.< i ~BO, Camo~ < i ~ ...,~„ .~o~, .~. ... ,n.~ . ,m .~A~ n.,m '.. ~,.~..~.,. ~...,.. ~.. 1, ~.. .,. .. } oo,^w ev ~ ~5 rr o. a,u ~ '~ .... .mm.. ., r LJ . J M P., m 6 Wn~ Smv I i ' ii. ., ~ o .... 1 O.OP i <.m Z ~ + Z • ~ and n iC oaf nm Vi O•• . .. Q m O t ~ f JTAL AAF~.IA~IC A1 FEGS I 5 W ~ nu'.a 1 „____ _ --. ~ .. n.~i i. n., O• U N . ! P: sw < ~ - N V IOTAI M JMN'NG FEES ' ~ ' 'C ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,:• ~ ~~ T ELEC MECH PLMBG FEES 1- OTAL' ~ ., . ., . 1 Iln ~ / .~ n/m ml~. ..,,~ • ~ rl,drn r'amrJ n . Gu ... ~~ ~.Fi...lbran .r~i.. ~ n .,,~~.. r. e m v,n.u .~,. d,.. ROUGH WIRING ___ _ __ _ _ NEW SERVICE _ _ __ FIXTURES _FINAL ELEC. INSP. _ I TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER _ I OTHER l ELEC. UTILITY CIRNCE. !i U, G._D_UCT_SIREFRIG, LINES F RO. MECH. o~d: come,~n~~„ Support; VmM FRJAL MECH. ~swnc u,n V nh. SFmo~h OTHFR OTHER U,G.~UNDER FLR, s...!, w^~..,, Goy, Svpoonr swv^..,,~~ma..^~ I 44 GAS TcST Sa•;.~ wi Y~ATER H?.R. o, ~«oa ~...~,. ~I $EWERIPRIV. GI9'~VSi Ervt OTHER OTHER ~ vA$ UTPJiV QP"JCF ! it ii r_ ilri6in i ~f, GAS PiFwIG •„.. I ICI ,a,;~;I ~, °~ Htnr~~ '' v ~~ ^~, ~> '', HEAL P(101. RMl1r,; I fil F'E~ u ~SFP~ Tlnl! -~- DATE II _. ._ __ ..~. ... _ _.._-_ -- ___. __ -. 4 _._... .. _. __ .. ___._. _.__ . _.. .. _... i. _ ~ _ ____._. _. ~ __ __ .__ I Si WEpR pRIV U15~ SYSTEM DIAGRAM ~ i ~l' ~-crt~ ! ! INSP. SIGN. ~. ifa~t~ •• '9UILDING AND SAFETY ION • city of rancho Cucamonga o3?n aye=Ire, ?or<he Orrmm~ngn, Cu, _91730 • Tel. 17141 7891851 e l Z' W' t\/ E f ~~ \J ~ ~ ~-"' Z 5L L O 7 ' c E ~~ ~. a a~ p __ _ No z!o.~,_ rvp• ~o,,. ____ Land Jmn ,, (~ 1 / \ LL' ~ Z ~ ~ No. Bed,pem! ~ lo! See S~:e ~ed L_{ . . . d. _N.Yi41- CCW] Apps. 11 J nnn~ S._ -._Lt21Z"'s 513"7 ~o.ero~, 3loLJc~lpLyti/IL xr r~r77tJ t~~~ tGS/S? ~Z3[7_ ry ( _..9Y3_-27T' . , Stare l<. Cry ~ Q,~~ NaM1., En o.:ry~.! ~ Af1.9 ~ 3 It , Li ndd.., ~~~~y,..~ti . . I~s7.,vv s~~ EGCF.S 3S I .v I'~!~ n qeu ~ Aa i R'.. ~ .r r. . BUILDING PERMIT Use Rmmn ~ ]n Re. ReQUn<tl ~.Aeaubed ARN Irp nom T9d-App .0.. vnwnnoN s ~ ~(/ ~. plat: Ci-FC['~NC. FiF _ ,.y~ ~ r~S/ 'i pFaNi' ~;f ~lgJ~[. F I ,.en': ,nn~ ifF e'i ~ I F z..rp.,F rFE S erAr,^u:ion :FF ~ I I >AA. ~ I i p:e:p I v.-.,.,, :. - TOTAL 2 : 0... _ ] /n! t L O O i Y. n.... :ne. r, ., ~~ I .: ..~ ., u.,..... ~ ,...~....r.a,..,. ... i ., ra .. .e. . . 'i .,. ~ a, ..~ ~.~, .. n. r ...... .........~ ......., fye,.c~m ire=- 9-~3b"~- tFi~ n n hu 'd~nq Pn~m,! .. pe. ry r„red oul, ! ~, inmd, and ~ :uSie!I In ..rr,.rae ~: .a ~~, .~ ,. , ~r .emm.: !~ e . ~.N.T ~ m~d~~pd ~~: !q~ u. . INSPECTION RECORD • fOUNDA00N IGr. eerar eamn reeb, saban'' INSPECTION NOTES fw A<in(. Seel. E~mrali0^. iIOOR SIAR/UII.. GIROERE MnA, vap Bam<•, RIRR~• Srym, An< , Ven ir, lmbr, MASONRY Rnnl„ Monpr Irs. Gmw Lht, CleomOub. Kolb. ROOF SHLU Noinng, pmaA Blo[N^q, Marmol Cade and iHAmu, cool Dmmr, iRAMINC Wallr, R:p, Irlr,. Blodmg, Bma~nq, -- Nailing, Ba[Fng, JionAr. Drolr EroW INSVURIOM iF~.4^eu. RVVIub vpmg, Smnd -_ Caullrng. fIREWALLS: Mopr,ol, 4m4nar, Compe Doon, Clwrr, amml. bn Rr INTERIOR: fAiH/DRY WAfI Nu:Lng, $vppvrrv, lope, Jerm Aanl. EIAERIOA IAiH !SIDING McIA„ Foer<^<n, Ivpe. hpaq iFi[Men, Bo[Yi.g LANAI INSiE<iION Irnu1 Gmdm9 Ce~r4, Slope -~ Ilan!., Ea<rgY Cama' ord a od v p• fne pmrr, C.,'y i .mg pe.rco,eefw{mgr, Nou a Nume<rr, W<arn[r $rripp.^v, >I [•qr Clea avimm Mla YVUI/SVA E%CAV, Rbhr SEiBA[x5 Rad~vi YI 9ona~^v,~ Eea SoJ. 4ma la[ _ __ urge _ m1'1 ~2 ~ - -.._ fENCF:pNf$ He 9e:. ^:~ar.r n. .rp, .y G/=13 br[An, Pabd.Y ~ r~ ,~ ~ r,(q. 1 IwAI IN$ala a: 19/. ~ /r ~ ~ ~ •/ MISCELLANEOUS SIRAV PAVrt ACOM AEtAlt iyfi R'AI: -- .. Dusi ro ~ .. , r.. a o... n IGrrIL ~- -.- _ ____~___, .___J -4- --- -, h - - - i t --1 -- -, --, --_; _~ unrE INSa. bcld • : ~ BUILDING AND SAFETY DIDISION /PLMBG /MECH ELE( . . . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 Bowline, Roncho Ca. 91730 • Tel 17141 989-1851 Z e.nal,A I/ n S ~~±yp Aderm/~//~(re A...~,.., - ~~<~ ~~ _ No oar„m,o„ uaml~o~l. comm.,<.ol. ma.n,~on Aso-.~cel - r.. - W / 7 O.ne~ / /~ G~IIIC'~w+C AL.1.~a..x(~~li~Y _ -"'~ ~ _ ISuv I Ou~l•n ^ Ma l' eg - 7 _ -TRI II'+'{_ AJJ,nI_ry( I~ Sga1 y t ` W F- @a.omdo l~geta. Sw~mM1ed - , y L I553Si.3~ ~L -~ A_tLS- .7 ~}i, i Mare„ i (~'ps 0 O A1.-t ~/LJ~C}fll~ {~.~:~D ~jy J` ~ pp lsoea~ir I Sq it bm New W- - G I e - ~~~~~~ ~ Ae~.nr ol~ew I r - - tvb Lc Gry 6 CI I Z L No. J J W An A< a BVg l plvv CFA lro, ' v fae a fne 1 W TN T Y I i' tOiAl EEECiRICAL FFES Q No w Oell~pon J 0 .,Plan a ' o ~ r .' v. Fee r ` ri ` ~~ ~m W ~ '(i0 Mk19TU ~a61 ud tHr ~ ` m. ..m I .~ n, W Y ~ fAU a. r '. Bo, cmp e Iw wu erU ~ v S rvv I /~ (-1 r,.l.. ... ".":'~;~: .. . .: ','.;o.' ::~. N '.~. w.. <.... I a, ~. .~,.. .ten I !-- I ,..._ ~. ~ ~,,.,., ,...... ..,,. ~..., ......, ~',~..,, -.~m~.,. ,.... L Q ~,~r..r m i I I ~...~e to xo e l 1 . V ~ ro.n ., ~r ~r ermF ~, l ^ Z i o•J _ ~ L,..a gun ! ~., _ __ n. ...- .. ... V n.~ c J rfre ~ __ .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~,~,~„ W ~ .. TOTAL rdK PIANICAE FEES [~~ / ~%=i W - ~ s.. V Z .. ... i v ~ ~ a ., ~ t ' L L / L" / L . _ ,.. .. , ... ~ 7~ ~ 0. T' IA' P'VA1 °,IN(, hE15 ~ ~ nr> / TOTAL ELEC., MECH., P"ABG. FEESI ~~ [ so., t~~ " l, , ~ ~ ..., ~~.~I„~, ~~.m,l ... ~,.. ,~I ,.a ~ ~ ., lrl .~ ~ ~• ..,r .., ,. a m. .. ,I. ~ ~ ~~t.,, ~:o e„~~ RIL P' r' ~{ CU' r UNDERGROUND CONDUIT NEW SERVICE r FIXTURES -.____..__ ~_ __ _.__ _.___-_ FINAL ELEC. INSP. - ~-_-__ -~_ ---~-~_---- ~~- ~_~---~ ~-~-- TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER OTHER .- _-___. _._..- _ - _. ___.-- _.__ -- ___-____ ELEC, UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG, LINES RO. MECH. ~o~m, cemt. nh_ _. _ __- _._-_. -__ _. _ s~oamn_v<nn FINAL MECH. vnu/nt wn ~ - ~ -~-- - - - ~ ~~ -~ OTHER OTHER 1 _. U.G./UNDER FLR, xn. wer.r, Gm, suaaern wary _ - __ __ _ . - _ _ __ .... _ _._ ..... _._ __ _ _.. RO. PIMBG. s::aa~~r,_r3ie:n:r,gi I GAS TEST i ~ SEWER; PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM FINAL PLMBG. r"'°~<,. voro,r, vem, vol.a„ WHTER NTR. ~, ,: a.I. ~~~.~ I SEWER/PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM OTHER { f OTHER t GAS UTI LITV GIRNCE. BnNDING ~y.7~7.d'3 -~~ vG ~..:.,..,~. ~ i ~. ~,AS PIPING vmv.~, ~., - GAS TF.Si I 1 I HEAtFP „r ,;~sn~:~~b I FIpIAI POOL ,LFC. ~. )J - FINAL PCOL PLMBG i Ui HFP IP~ISPE(alU,. DATE INSP, SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFETY ION • city of rancho Cucamonga BUILDING 934C Baseline, Rancho Common n, Cn. 9 V 3p , *, ~ r±74~ 9gq. ia5 i PERMIT &iiltli g Z Aaer<_,___J / d' CA M_Rit/CNA LI'r-_ _ s°_--,- _ T<n r __ __ o° Lm Nlxk Tma < C r ^ W No - ~ Ott r ~NO D. TL P it v 1w. O^- ~---- /~~~ ~------- lOpd Unrs am Meiling 7~ ~ ..__ BedrO 1PN < Addrn_ p ^ ry _70/0 -CLf__/LI////Cs/i4 ApPravM~l~t~'c7 ~ _-. r.~ G /' -- __ Zp._ . - fel pa r01 Fnll. Div. ~s v O Y J -- _-k-_ _.~I. _._ . Comm. - --- dm -- Adarnr ---- - W cy .- zl I smro L~~gHy!'? -- j2~d 7H/ 3 - vAwerro C.~' / 6 Claeul. f .p/~x ___ 'j N<. % PLAN CN W fnec. I ' ~ '~ ly _ _ PE9MIi I re (.I ._.. ._ ._. '` -....._ F" GE __. _ _ ._ _ _-. 0 Smle - - _ . - .... -. - ~ - T m<d _ S _ _ . _ _ LC NO.- 5(. N ` d P.0 No- - , <A ~ G(I On Pml. s' .- U - ~ ~ f sln.~<I um sr r ~ ~ ; ve ~eea ` ;oiAL ~ . NA. [~ aaa. ^ Alm, ^' P<pe~, C1 Olmo<^ linT„ L ~ vm d<r~<~ D ~~) K ~- !. ~ ~ 1 ~rvF^ ,'Yi I.IC;N1 HTNATT~P'F.9 III.r I.ANATInN PF'YNN t'n41'I:rY.9ATl!)N NF.TIANAT'r 1.Y ~il:m: ;.'mnmr ma <ewn-:.r"': 'I "~r,.r~.°ro;. °rn."";"de"rm. ^..: C:"'"r.:m'~...°;'::i,.w'~'~:~o- ,~..r,,..4A U, ~°e...,r.. .a;. ~; ! I r ~ .r~.,r :Ma.~ brml 1 ^ra i M I. O r O C<.. .v. re x T ~: :. r:m ". r_X i ~l~ Ir b N n ~ f T 1 Ii' .S Mut tq M1N Nrd V ~ 1Jr ~ ~.. s. re.; nr . f.Pm Irk PllY rw r uNm~ rd. Inr4.. , i i ~a%rw. 1 Mm n1 ~rtiM., nr.d n qr / 1 pT~rNr^n .r.;.;l •Ir, I r ,r. ~ I Ur :'rrfn:mnv. rnl' mpm wl;~.p T;~ y wl„ A,rb~ w ^nl ;l;r wnrl n!/;rm A rN.Prflllr-nnN I9'YNIN .^AIi FNr;Y rll M'^ < ^ .. rrn ^AM nAnrl ~.<~nrVN~ A`r .r r... .;° rAnr <i .nr F.rIA ... w;mp'ne .n.r nn rA. r.~Nr. I F r v fnr ~A.n rr<. r.rm;r Ir iwr;rl r5.. APr, t;N rry.i nerf rm.nr. (C'' ~ I r .. In: rAr ~n~r, vei v,m n r.rr ~..Irrf.•H y... r~N.nr•r. ~n n~%~nl..n~mµlr N. r..n.r~A.N.w. - __ La .... rt.nV «~mt ,..;,~',. r ^,...r-,--:c t"°i r^ ~ Pm,..,. ..rF . ~.. r... H.:I iLU~•nl L ... ..,.1 T~1 O ' L, .~.., ,.-- .,., I ` r :. ~~m m~:rrx~M-m"~;~~.r ,: .,:{~ ',".~;a~•_/.,, v Nr. -.. _ ._ _rr...r ~ _ N,ilm< AN.Ir~° r.l~<•A _ fr.rrlJ 'ter ?^o~ iA4 r o bdldmg pvm r ..hee pmvPPllr Idled n ~- <ap%r01~nn ~ n<r4 IAnr<und<r rl mm.n[rd r'Pn;Oenaed oolr bnndOn<d I ~ II pbIKI 10 10 0 1°Yt • INSPECTION RECORD • i fC0"m;'~;04.. ;': ; "" "" `' I INSPECTION NOTES f --- nooR neo ~" ... - ,. .~ i00% -_.,~~. i _ v ~ .. n eo ~... '' ~ ~ F F N4 :S [~ ~ON{~' (p ~~ ~.,,. ao-.• , ; ~ .~ FRr,R~o~ ~~.,~., i ?~~ ,.~~ -.~--- ~ ( SWIMMING V L'SPp ~~ ~, U.., itl ~~ '~ i„ ~~~~M ~ ~~ ~ q i"' ~- ~ ~ MISt EIiPNEUUS •~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~ >~ ~ - .~ . .~ - .- f ~' ~; r •~ 1t P BUILDING AND SAFETY D.ION • city of rancho Cucamonga ~'932G oeseime, Fiandlo CucaTarrga Ca. 3.' Tel. ., ~,,.,., emlmoy rm o:rrrwr~v~ IAdd Z Aao•a 70 LA An/Gt/A !~°- r s<<r.; LOI BIOCk TrBCr _ ~i SCI. LJJ ~0 83o a~r;~rr o~ger _~.'Ar, <vran.r leg fSiTr7 LoRENZo MaJ AOd CM O can J "°° W ary \ St W n C ro a XP ` .. ,..,..I .... U ~~r ~ ~ 5a~v ~ A ~ O ~,., ~,.. .,. m; inn u, n 000 da .o ^d a 0 h / r .m c. O r ., Z . n - F ve r Fa• I OrF.~ .m ....,,r .r . U vn .. " ~"A I .,un Fee a.r.r rtir W M. . -.. _._ -~-~--- ------~ ~-- f TOTAI MEC FIANICAL FEES ocn.Anannx er aM.,., ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. PERMIT ~com . „r, r~d~r _ ,.._ -.. o r I sv 1 l.~ _-.. _ _ I 5 Areo Ne+ Ami I 61dg. ~' sa sr ~ N.. - Rm Arrerory Bldg ~ ~0~ A4o CM1I a fee { vuarc ~T L EI~CTRI~F~S , R.a ^~ f ~ rde ud r-'..r`:!^r nr„~ ....or rys, u.~,r..s~,. ) V ru r m,., . n m:. Y.m, ,, .... o. ... Fb wnu s.rv .M. J ^ ~ .`~ n, u ,r. r„n,,a,. r.~e ,,.. ...~ ~ ".. ~.:::.~" C ,... r-4 . . r~ _: .... ... .... ... ~,., ~... ~.-n.., .. ~~ r, e, N. n.,,.wl.~~ Ae. I g .~ N i ar , n.. Car. Sr+'<^ ~ I ~ I z - ... rr 1 ~,...,~, ~.~LL~r t ~~, ~ r ~; ' ~ ~,,, . j ~rcc i . ~ r .,I r. ne iv J Fnn . / a IOIA~. PLUMBING FEES I TOTAL ELEC., MECH., A+LMBG. FEES r~'~_J (~/ ,r:.. _. - - --- A ~• - -- .~ r .. ~ ~ I. ,.d .~d : a .h. , ,~rni. r„ .,, ~ .. .v. r..,~ ~ ,,,:~. '. IV ,r verve .. vsv~eev.d ro, laoae„rr 'gyp INSPECTION R SPECTOR NOTES UNDERGROUND CONDUIT _-_ ROUGH WIRING - __.-- _ _ _-_-_- NEW SERVICE fIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE "~ OTHER _... ~_ ~ y _ ~ OTHER _...- ~ _- _. ___- -----t - - _ . ___...-_ ____ ___...__ ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U, G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES _- ~ oroe. Comb. Air,-__ RO MECH ___ _.___ . . s.PHwn, v.nn rAWAC~~" FINAL MECH . " ~ • . __ __ Ur nn, SArwPo _._ OTHER _ - _ .,• ___ -_ OTHER • .---Fr _ ____..__- _ __ _.. _.- S ~_ soa, wQ.r, U.G.(UNDER FLR. ,. _-_~r_._....._.-._________..-- wm.,, co., v.m,. RO. PLMBG .__ .. .. ..-_. .-__ ... __ ... _.-._.___- ..~ . avPOn_=m~nmg:_ ~ GAS i EST I SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM °'.m,~~, val.n. ', FINAL PLMBG . Sanut I V<n ~, Valve,, WATER HTR , v,., as v,o. SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM ' _ __. . _ ~ OTHER i I ~ OTHER 1 GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. ~~ BONDING II 1. !'llNlll lli (.AS PIPING idnlp,,,l, urpm GAS TEST ~~ h1EMro .. ~ o.~,~~a, ~~, sr~~l on I INA; rOOt HEC, FINAL POOL PLMBG `ll H1~ INSPFf TION DATA J INSP. SIGN. •. A 'BUIL'DING APdD SAFETY ION city of rancho cucamo:iga 43^0 B =I' Ranches Cllrmm~nao Ca. 91730 TAI. 1714' 9691851 ~ BUILDING PERMIT as_In_. - _ pp~ •• (~__.__ BuIIdInB /~ ~~~ ~~G~Y 11~1V~ Slo:m, _ iCo~~E ~ ~ _ ~G-~ ..~~~ _ pw~ ibe vmm~ t Z ndar«, 9`x'2-6 _ __.-. - o~la u~N P ^~~r<a_ ^ tol --- Bmk trva ', Re mrtd ^ Pe W No. _ _ ..-__ - _... no lot Own<r Sie I/`PN Ma1Lna CcwJ apc. - ~'i °. ~. Aov'. fJ'i F.^. APPi. oA APPr ~eer<,; ~ 7~ _C ~~..~,~ Ic., S C 5~-'-- - a<a<~,<d ~-~ '~ a<a~~,<a ! P<,~~:<a _ ^~^~II<a __~ • 4 Z~y (d. 9 SPa.d. ~I~ ,- 1~. ql ~ ~~,_ ~e~d.a., F~RMiT ~P~RE~ --_-_- O ~o~l,:rlP, Cw 1~n ZII J eem.~,-- _- _--~ -,- NO WORK. DONE IN LAST 160 DAYS Ave w ~,~ _ _ 1Z,P ie~._ ..__ ._. 9me ~Ge. _ _.. _- ._- _ Gry _.- _ / 8 CImnL Lc No. Ongne_ Clly ~LP Srale { No. __ T ProPOUd-~) ~j~~ .CI~ ./ E Con IvCl~on }, L~,K/\ 1M1 ~ ~W/_~_' T: "'\L -lT -- . ~' ' 'ly~s~ ~ Jr ~ 1.1 [ \n/ '_'P~ x ~.C'•1 DE`G~ I Z CC~~µ161: Lam.. F~CI~- ~(~OI ~~~P S p. EI i'~fic7 {IA fb'P 1 <, .o o.. 2 I.I f. F.N9Y1: rr1NTRAlTt~x 9 rir ..11T r.n~ in nnirm ieltll un ^li.rnrvJ r~r B~~•nm~.n~l i`n.~winn• ~'~i :nil m~ O ~^^ n :xN 1 I V n. A Q III: ~~.1.n <l~ ~ A .U n. nn.n. ~~ ~ ~ "r' E U ~, O .m a roll. .a. ,/ /~fH _ 1 ~ M ffE 1~ ~ ~ E SY4F 5 ti __ 3 BEAIII',iU*ipN FEf ~~ ~ l ^ l PaAx IFf _ I ~ _, OivEA J ,~ _ _- - _ By • V ~~I-o//.(, vn~r~e~. ..BM ool.<•i ~ a ,_ Q,{ oxlT.nxA oex,.xs r~~arl,t.9ATlo~ ~ ,l n.,.r ..• n~~~ 1 i~:G:~.:nP. .',i1.P.. In M.i P.. ,i.__ ... . e'~.m~~~n. O r i : ~. lid. M1~.nln~fur,laA..l A M.i ' Nn f I ii. iF' ~ ~ FI II NI ' I 1 ly< ' p rS ! r. R y~p ~4 I f y/~ .....r.n ~ .. ~ N..+ I ..""' .. ~ ~ ~t.. I ..1 mr.n~i /`~ , ^ M.~I n. A~II ~-. I e. xrno-, , I . 1b, a boad~,9 Pmvl~ . ~~op=•p Irlmd v neA mll ~ .al•d a.n wbinrl I n•ni~' nn J .rn . Rn .. In n n .a n,n.nA c ...rMr.l o aF.n^ ~ ~. 1^: ~ V ' .~ fWNOAiION G, Cere! Comp imlt Serba fn.m.. R.i^r l , _ fIOOR SLAB/ISiS , G14DfR5 MevM1, Vao ~r BIA9~r Span:, Anus, vmn, L lmbr. MASONRY Re:nl„ Manor l~s . Grow Gin, QmmOun, Bons AOOf SH1G; Noilrng, OmaF Bloai'mg, Mare ur Grade ^nd iFICF ess. Rool Oro~m fRAMING Wvlb, R^0, Itls,. Blod:na, Branno. Ne:Ang, g^cLino. DiapM. Dmlr 51opr INSULALION iM1~~inx; A~Valuee Irpng, Sowd Cp.lbng fiREweus Mamr:m, iemw~en Dampen, oaa~r. Clasen, Fodb0. WLS. 1 INiER10R: LATH/DRT WkL Nod:y, SIp , lope, loinl Reinl f%BERIOR UiN/SIDING MoL. fMenxa, lafy Ropq Thrtknen{ Sac Yang. fINAI INSRECiION Rnnh Gadinp Cent, 5'ep<I flan . '.^e.9Y C asp Cc.L °c '^E RYC A:: ~: Fne Door, Fm. lodieg Dencn, mnAngs. Nwre NamLe: v. WealFer Slrpp'^3 RI .E~gr Clee • INSPECTION RECORD • A ,. , ~ A . A ~ n INSPECTION NOTES SWIMMING POOL/SPA ERUV REU6 SE'BACAf Rodeos 59 BonE ^n I I Evp Snd, 4nmp wa So~~l'nrge .. r... __ _ _ _ ffNCN GA*ES nmy+' Cbrrvr Ar ~nm~M1ry i lphl:n, Srao~nv __ I F'NAl !NSVrf 1'pl: MISCELLANEOUS SRAAV pglr,~ BCI: r.• -_ I _ ..____ __-_ _.. RE'A".n:G WAR . __. I _ =.... ,.. .~ .i ui NEeo I ~ _ l. _.. >Oril _ ._ ~ __ _ - Sv-!LC _. .._... __ I ...._____ rN('rRl - ~ - --DAZE l INBf. i GN. '+9 %'( $/I'~"f ~((p.~~ S 5~ L6FYL~Yir~TN~ /E`d t t BUILDING AND SAFETY ION •r ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9340 Baseline, Rancho Cpcamon a, Ca. 91730 • Tel. PI4' 9891851 °n ,nderxa^+. c,mmao°I. '^e°""ep -- P•' Burltlrnp [[''~~ ~~ +~ ~ B r 1 Z Aweless J ~[ 0 ~''l OY'~ 7 _ ~+ISrr._~ ___ _.-. __ _. _ _-_ Lol Bb~x irecl ~ Oorler No Neupmc LyXM, SwJrFm W Own~VY1 ~ `Fnmret le - -_ -- - 2 Marling ~ MOrm+ I __ O _ _ _ ~ISpeaM__ _ _ ___- I-' S 5`. Fl. Area New y~ 9 roJ<nnvl Bldg. ~~,, /~ ~ "~^ J Y . Tt So Fr Ar.a New W U • '.__-`~'--___ _<' -- n ~ ] .3 _ x., Asr, .ory mpg ~ _ W „ FO Plvn CFY' p+mntt Pve .__..._ CrW p fe< _ _ __, . _. _ . slate ~.~c S~0 Lac No ~ 1 O TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES 60as:n h. __ W r.¢en..r. rm.n.rnrx'a ~ca.ac.n^n p.rc,, r N° _ ~q•npr'.°° t r y prvt~F~+.`<aw, ~M m Nn~ `fAU 'o 6p'a~lue Borl<r'Cempr. Q rnl o ~rM oru 4 vir ~ j o 8 In lud ] "P- _ _ _ ' IDB BW BF,. - B C mo 'fAU° j"P ISHP~ _ p a rr m. IpO WB BID - ~-T r ,v., a..nv.,._r m, b F' W°II Su,p IA X Bier a 6 - - i.~ i "~°rc, d rg ooo dm 1 v . ; .rr,. V......nrr.., n. F .rn~. mn $p,vY Baer ~ ~ ~ e. lO,vaB~ dm " Fr r Fv vd `0.4e~ Z O r.m i...mr.t r..... ... rr l f r. iF. .r.... ~ Flnn CFYn rl v_d f: v: sua a Fee _ Fee t '-." - ---- -_-- _ ~ TOTAL MECHANICAL FEES - .. ~ °~ o pue° Fee _ L rln D 1 ~ _m ^ r m ~y~ ~"1 1'1I..~( w° ( , r N 00 _ xW4,b'S2~IIb~ , /L,lhn`Gt~`A-y-- ~ ~ w "ear ~ 7 __ O ~n V .n..l /// N ~ Bn y b; ! U e 5 n/ _ I V r... Z Y. Fe. Barr 5 rC°+ m O. .i.._ 1 ~ ~ Acv 'rf 1. e.V „ .' ~ , ~ r;~, ~' , ~ ~~ ~„ . ,r "r ':" ~~ r.^^ i., TOTAS PII,M ~ i I!'; ,'r ~ ~~V •' RING FEES ~ ~ _ -' ~ PLMBGr FEES (~ ~'C' ~ -~1,f TOTAL EC., IMECH., ~e ~ w. .... nl„ , - r..,r,.~-n-, 1/9_ 0'0 .r e I I (a•Fea . °~~ Li~ I ~ ro ~ .. - _. --.~ - ^ee and .,Iren Le. end n ... , r.,,,/... ^ raF/p~ r.g ° •~;,d pa . mrne gee m ns^. coned 1 r Im ayr•~ rubrCl 10 !•p rn'on xer4 I rre.r e r rn nn UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE _-~~__~ __-~-_'- OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH. o~m. [omn. ear, s•vv«n_ V.nn _ FINAL MECH. veu/k u.S ____ Vnn, Sn~mN, OTHER OTHER U.G.~UNDER FIR. s°'I' w°r" ___ ___ cm_srvao GAS TEST FINAL PIMeG. v'nmr:, vo!.u __ _ _ se~•,a, WATER HTR. v.m, v°m.,, . P: <,: 4r1. Ycl.r ' SEWER/PRIN. DISP, SYSTEM ~ _ .. .__ ~ OTHER wi OTHER _` GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. _ BONDING -' a r, ~ONnIpT ~~ASPIPiNG M°r,~ ,~ !- ry GAS TF.Si H E.4 TER ~ c"°'"' gar.,, Snur oP ~INAi. POOL i i,C. FINAL POOL PIM BG. U?HER R~bi'E~ iiON _ . - -1-- _ ~ r t DATF. INSP. SIGN SEWER PRIV, DISP $VSTFM DIAGPAM Bl11LDIN~i A~b &AFE:7Y L" LION city, of rancho Cucamonga 4?20 Rzse!In=, Rancho Cucamor, a, Ca. 9.730 • b 969-7663 ewlmn q _ Z Address /~ WI BIpcM Trac W ND ; owner _l Maning ' 4DDre5S ~/.' +r. r nD . *ei / ,i, i O .nmracpr f Andress W cn zrD *a Srare Lm Gly B Ciass~l L¢ No w ^ [X960 WNTRpCTpp'9 DRCI.,IPITION Q 1 MyTr •!II Y~rprrM.in~~ . ~4 B.nneYr~N I I~p..m•r M~rnA m. • •M rllrer Z S lw.~ (y C r..~ I~~1 FzaVliJ~tR Dr. .~PRTIO,Y //I+TTrb pn. rr.~ m, Yrr 1 nm r.mpr ,rn rnr Cnnrrrn.rr rvrrr. V~ for rAr ~J vw.n. n. cur . r • .nrr rn9 J,r ..w~ur. it nn, nt.nnr.r n~ n re.~r le. u.~ O ~' m nrmm^.rn.n ~ r rn~, ..nv, in r..nm. rn. r...,. ..., ... 15<r.mn EIEC./MECH./PLMBG. PERMIT I i Cmrm ~ _A¢eprndm Lghry. 5_il<ha _ ___ ____ __ _ _ r__ r _ _ ! Rrrura _. ~---_ . ~ N tMOr_ _~I__.1 iNR .n sa. Rr. Wren N.w Ro, Aaurarv BIY F Na ,L _ _ I) t :t i, ----~L--_____ -___. TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES I e.er 1 Xp ra I. Np I rp. ~~ An NoMbl ro 6 ~__ --~~~~ bdvd r0~0g0 dm i _ ~ ~V_ n, . la,aao r .. .. .- _ -_ . - i1 _..-_.._ _ Rin;`a~ ~___ _ I :,,.n<,<. _.. _ _r._. _ ,,.. ,f !, Lam @..~._.~-. / ~'~ v...- ..,._._ . _: . '"- -' "- -----' TOTAL MKHANICFL FEES i, - .~rxRras rnRtr s..: nw perr.nn.np.X --~ f = p Lb op a ~ r ' ,..,, _ ~ c 1 w ~ .I1 o ~ ,n L ~ 1 w ~ f J O ~ i . _ p 5 C l I I ~ r . u. , n r. r. .. ... ..k .. ... elf I e,rt ~ 'orr t <~. : ... ' . . . . .:. . , .i. V . , I,,.nn<. r. `° ", r ? ... . .. ,,.,, r. , . . u.l - _ - '{ I TOTAL PLUMBING FEES ": ' :~ I ' ~ ' ... r...... „ w..r....rr ._ " ''°' "`r'" :: ":,'" .. "'~°''n°° " PLMBG FEES TOTAL ELEC MECH ;/ . ., ., -' - - _- ... .. _. .. ... ., _-_ -~- ~ 'ore ~wnudmrpn r ,. ~ ~ ~ ~ thn u n ebr:' ~ ••.nomol/pI+T6rng permd .Tm prmr•ly IJlyd our, tlgned and roLdvbd, pnd n mbjetl la e.n m, •pd rh.revedo, a nol rommencrd nr I wrprnded w Dbpndonad lpr I~p dq'e ,~ Gas ~iN~ r~ r 6-5i~r7 ,~'~ 3UILD1Np AND SAFETY D~ION ~ ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. cit~r csf rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 320 9 37'30 383 8L 9 aserrne, Want to wcamwlya, tea. .. rrrn r er,rlmry J ~ _ Nr. o<r[r~or„~ IAdd.no ;, c.m _ . _ r.l, md.rl ren - ... - . __ f.. .--_ nears ` ^t , f l - - s<; [e i Z Lol erOt4 Trarl r Srz• I _I _ W No r : ' ~ _ Ovlrek ¢ Own 1 " I W .. IRe<e0r4tler LgFn, Sw'r+Fal _ /',1~L /'(1 N I MarLng ~ } R.IVrm - - Aaarezs ~ G , Lr / 1n ~ Mo'crf Cily DO ~ ~, T¢I J yXG eo _._ . _ ______ t _ _ _ _ _ O -+ ~ 54 it Areo New AOarezs I~ Re+~de.ricr BIdA, C _ _ _ j ___ lJ _ Fr nr.o rr<w s _ _ LJJ cny Ino rel J 4. Rp+ A[ces+ory Bldg (.~ W V:o. <'.Y I ~f ~~f~ $131¢ 4C Gry I Illua.« fee ( v V 6 Gr855r1 l'4 NO f< - -r{ W ¢aernan rmm~e[-rcrFa n¢r¢aannm TOTAL ELECTRICAL FE ES V._( 0~ ^ ,~m~ r[,~er,,,, r1 o u n f« Q n.... r ! ... r...7r w. ¢., ,....-r r..~.,.. <.n..-n ., .r< ,~ . . o fAU ro 6 n;lud. Borl<r /Comyr _ a W I[l] (utl BN la 6 Intlud ] wR r N . r r r x ¢n.n"x r u ~ . fnu n;m sod,-: comor. ^ 1 . ..nr .. n.m mu r .m nnnm rmm rn. .nrrmnr. r ~.m~. re m. m. } i .~ 090 BiU o er 3 rIP ~0 1511p O = e + V/^il Su~c A+r Xnndler l0 8 ,n..~rr ... r ..... , ..n. , . , ~ Q .,wd lo,ooa dm I n<.. ,., i ` .„, . . ..,,. .r,.n ,.... ~ .,,-r Q :,.., ... ,N„ u ,, r V a r e,.e <,, n,~dl< I srr .. , . , r - GF• ~ cnd ... IO rA [Ir Z O r .m ...mm v,a. a. r a l . . ~..n, ..... Q r ic• i Orl... I ~ U .. vva . <f.. fe r f TOTAL MECH ANiCAI FEES ^ xux 1~5• tr • x. r . v ~ v ~r ...r ... ~r 0•r or lro Fee <~ ..., ~..,. rr...e..:c... rrurn... . ,r.,. .... ... . _ .,r. r,...r r 2 r o -v ~ ol,. ~._ --'r.m:,~ --~' r } ~.~~,~e, / ~w,r.. w~,er+ ' ' 3 ISO 1 , r., .~.e nr N e„r ray. ' y .. s.w I wl. . I m V ~ ,..r.r ,.~~. r ,.r., ,.~ „ .~,,,, s..<r ee• ... _ 1 1 f A° '"` ~ r of ~ ~ l i ~ ^~ ~ ~ . < +., ~ ~ v C ~ Q1 *OTAL Pl+ M81NG FEES ~ C+L' ~ ., ... . ...,. "' r ~ ,. PLRaBG FEES TOTAL ELEC MECH ' 5 / ~c2 , r . ., ., Cj v .... ....:.... _~_ ._~. r. 3 .. co+d _ .. ~ , R.,me v31,aa1~,~ 'rn. . i .~. r ,ilm.,Fe., r/, y nw. ~ _ . Luro ¢ ,mr .r~dm•d. ¢ roved m •~a r r .... r w.a.. n r -.. o. -. r rovna•d n nb.naonal for iq0 don' i~ 7CI_ I RO'JDGH~WIRING CONDUIT ~ ~ .~~v-~ ___ FINAL ELEC. INSP. _ TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER ELK. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES_ RO. MECH. D.m, comn w.., FINAL MECH. FdU/ec u.;, ~~ vmn, sn~wn, OTHER -- - -T_.__ . _.. _ 1 _ _- ~ I I G /I IN~FD FI D ~O^~ wO'O'~ -- ___ "uvp_?n ._ ~ _ wme~„ coy, v.m., RO. PLMBG , 5°ppem. FI°s~mgs GA5 TEST FINAI PLMBG. F."„"`' vpl""' So+~ur ~, ~/o ~/ap~/ II /~'/ db ~~ "// d -~~r~~ l'/ J ;q °en'~ v°I°.r. WATER HTR ~ III . u. gel von. SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM ' OTHER OTHER I + GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. 60NDING V.U, IVIVDVII GAS rlPwc '~°~,.,I o.,~~ r,AS TEST NE/ iLP ""' ' s ^ FINAL POOL LI~C ~ FINAI rpfn. pLMB', ' Ill ..N I INS{'~.`TOF/ Di•TF INSP. SIGN. SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM $UILDING AND SAFETY ~IpN I • city of rancho Cucamonga ~ ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. 9320 Basefne, Rancho Cucamon a Ca 91730 PERM g . . • Tel. p74~ 9 39~i 863 IT Z aunaing neere:: 9870 Liberty Nc omn pr,m IAdd,rcm. <cmmwcol, mm:r:~op r ' W poi alccx nan ~a 19 4 10076 .. se:.~:<r S re r o.~e. LIGH1iVEE2 DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ o"n~~~or~<: I °<` _~:_, s. r;F<:I Maibng Aea:esx 390 N. Euclid Ave. X202 ~ , 0..Imn ary z N ~~~.<.' . ~ U land ~ oo 91786 'e InP <o l coma^. , C.[7. TAYLOR PLUDBING, INC< V . I isa.~~l, J Aaelass P.0. BOX 847 ~ sa q n.<a N". F d Cny ry mnnl BIAv ~„ ~ W ~iP iel Cnino 91710 591-1791 W ~ S4 " Ano rJe Yn A==.::~, le stale L ~,r• a c ~ 426865 C 36 W < >IC" R~ a.. r - ~ L,~ "m 6711 c r<= < (,iJ Lyl,. vxru anxannr.u.x nrrr.xnnon TOTAL ELECT RIrgL FEES - ~..,.. l r. w x... r ~ !re N 0" ~~ ~ S " V 'a i ~^1 ,rl C p : n f b l Ip0 (q0 tU ~ Hn o e n.. " ~ ~~... W ~ I fAV o. 0 I C Ino,om e' ~. ~ a IS ro n ... d onw d., ~ -- -- ~ ~ r ,,, iOTAI MECHANICAL FEES c j f:C2 1bg178Ti5o f1~ I tl ~t1 )Il IL1L w ~~_ .. U .. ~ .. ., ~ < I ~ i lJ s<n ~ (~ . « J ,., z ~ :, i w " ,` ' .J ~ , ~ w .. ~ , ; , .. " ~ ~ r : ~ o . .,; " ° 7 uU : _ 1orAI r„1ngaING reEa J 7 j UU ~ " "' ~~ ' ' TOT l EC., MECH. PL,ABG FEES] L ~ t , . . ... d. . ..n=, r.. ..r..d:,,,.,.~ r,,.: "e dot: UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ~ ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE _ I FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP, POWER POLE -_ __ j .. OTHER ~ ~ OTHER C ELEC. UTILITY CIRNCE. ii U. G. DUCTS~RE FRIG. LINES I Dom, Comb Mr, RO. MECH _ s~nro~n, v~ms fAU ac u•.. FINAL MECH ~ , OTHER I i I COTHER ~ s" w"" U.G.~UN DER PLR ~~I , RO fIMBG. w„+, c-~ v '"rro~ n ~r ~~ ~ GPS TEST ' ~ ~ FINAL PLMftG 3 ~ ... wnrPR r~rP w rr... e. .-.. ~ ~ SEWER PRro L': s's EM ;2610-6 ;K„}~ r THcR OTHER GPi U?"~.'iY C.i ~VCE. ~ ' ' V V ~ .r i j r~: Y ""i ~ I ~p 4F', 'i',~ ' ~ I rj bi{Ali ~ .~ ~ i j i 9i 'r~" PI .,L I'I ~ '~ i D 1 - ~_- ~ ~.t;bl'E 'gC~PI ~ UAir ~ INSF. SIGN. SEW'FkPRIV DISP SvSTfM DIAGRAM a~NRSrdinp CounW -EPWA/Land Management Dept. 'FICE OF BUILDING AND SAFETV Pone tilled in by ANd¢ant-PLEASEf sorer': Nam I 1 . Cz~l2,~', t ~ 7~-~ aibn9 AnW es OB SI TE ,yam ..n .DDRE55 f~'a'sPP''~Y~. gRCEL NO. Lol Np. Blo 'ec. wit. n5 Intandetl ~~ /v ' Permit Uu /v SEWAGE SV STEM ~ Pvblic ^ Pnrate ~ R¢pa Lot Dnnensrom Ne.$mnes NV.B No. BId95 - Haw Now on LOt Used Wheni Contravrnr _J _ (j"j'F%04 Permll Na Indea / Re&, APPI¢abon Dorf Ry 'y-~? 6 -'rYY l~ Plain Plol Gr. TYVe Plan Gate Permit Issue0 ~~~: Y uaa Namcer H.xardou: ~~ Area ^ Q/ F.HA ~Vei ~Ne Sq. Ft Mm Dep\h_,. S. F.,'100 gal. 1 GmMnp Cu Yds. f LODfl E%t. WALLS INT. WALLS G[lurvs• ""°- Wm%1 Elea. ELECT. Concrete Masol Masonry GMn Beam Placer Con Nel Gas Woae F ne Frain a Plaster Sheetwck run. n L.P.G. $q¢w Sidlnq Sheetrock Wo Metal SUlar __ Metal Wood IUer0wrd LIe 'o u V PLUMB DIVISION OF I NDUSTRIAL SAFETY PERMIT CERTIFICATION i ' site to n as a prerequ lifornia Healta end SefeFy Code requires a Divrnon of Indostnal $efely PFrm TM C ' a di perms Issuance unless the apPUCant signs one of Me Can caW„ Mle pews s req .e to deuend, will w o ^I cenlly Met no eacavabon Bor more feet m dents, In end that np bulltlmy, aructgre, ualloltlinq. ermit s M MECH , r P made In connection with work eu Monzed by will M more than 3E leet high. r¢ol M , e ialseoork, or demolition or tlismamling t from the Dlersion e tP tlo rwrk whmh wvultl regwre a (erml ~qs owner; huildei I will not emnloy anVOn nIC:s SJCM1 pnr<nn Iran a Mrmil from that diVl:ion. G b J u. pl Indusirrel Salpry, a<nnteJ a Division of Indostnal $alety Permit No -- WORKEfl$'COMPENSATION INSVRANCE CERTIFICATI)N Plan Rev. Fr fl I rernly Mat in Me Performance of the work for wM1icM1 Uus perms Is issud I shall nor emplCY anY .. r.,m»,,,er.nn laws of Caldornia. ::":.,. ~ ('Hoyt Fee ~~ person m any m nrr so as ro t>rw:n~ .wrv~• ,- E rPlretmr Date Elec. ree WOrkprs Coniflen5dtipn nSUrdnce POIicV Np rformance of Me wVrk for which Ibis h I plumb. Fee nr t a Pe 1 hereby afbrm that mere Is a conshucupn IenJmg a¢ncV Mech Fee permb n issued 15ec 309], Civ C I $omr Fee LendeYS Name ._--- ---~---- Gratling Fey Lender's nddress_ C rn e4 ililV will'. dl: laV:s requlatinq Cnnxirucirr^ r ._ .e r„ergyr . ard a9r 111aVe reed ibis aPnl~~on Fee MIU t ) __ is Gignature.~._Y ~ l~ . Pmmlt Fee __ ~ in^nSe Np,~_ ~a aCtOl'F $i9nature $urveYJ! 'OEPAFTMENT USE ONLY Plen Cf eFl. Valuct rr BV- Zone Mlnimem SeMaak D,m„r.es -' ` R/W __ Front $atUack~FOm'Ce`t~er Lyin~e R¢a!$LIICacN IroR+Re-~Ply.er~~ ' ~f~w,~.~( .fir ¢ _,Rrw - side s¢igaerr vum Profier,v Lane __ $IAe $etback hUm PfOPertV Lme FEF. Paid ~s-~7n ill ui n nr~,r ur. '„ ~ ~ ._._ .._.- _._- ~i(~~YA~r//P I l~//~/, d ~~ ~ /~l~ ~ INSPECTION 4[CORD DATE INSPECTOR DATE INSPECTOR Setback Elenrrcal Service and Grountl Temporary Power Rpuglr FI¢¢tncal Faundanan Reinforang Steel flnngh Plumbing Facavation anv Forms Stoner Pan Test F,H.A. Fomdauon Req. Su nw Mesh or Entenor Siding Slab Grade Ins dzbon Ground Plumbing _ Serer - Untlerslab Duc h,r ~-~~ o~ UMerslah Lnndmr ~ - SePln: Tank Fireplace Foundauon Ie:FF Lm0 or Seep Pd Jvisls and Girders Warer Serc¢e i Elegrrcal Grountl Lai r nr Drywall Nailing I t- Mid~Herghl Rnntl Beam__ _ __ B~FOOt Bantl Beam ) _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ~ _ Gzv line An Test __ __ _ _ FnA £lecvrcal _ _ _ _ _ _ __I ~ ~~~ y _ _ Fnal Bontl Beam ~ FinJ alumbmg Frtplace Band Beam Pool Sheathing Framing antl Venulauon Root Cav¢.rmg Rough Heating Frml Ieating;q C. Fiwl Consvucnan Fn tl Zenrng Cemhcare al Occupancy SEPTIC TANK___~_ GALS _ __, _._.__ ,. ____., __ SEEP Pli _..__.. _%. _ _.._ ._ _._ _.-._-__.__ LFACH LINE _._. _._-. WiOE ____ __ .-..____..-,_ % _.-.-_ __ LONG %__ _ _ ._ __ __ DEPTH OF ROCK ____ - h E S ...___--~-__._ _ .. __ BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ BUILDING A city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9340 Baseline, Roncho Cucomon a, Ca. 91730 • Tel. 17141 989-1851 Addml' C / E/C'_ _ GLL ~ l I Bloh i 1 9coes __ _ Oa _I Cor•rr. _ No. Dw. _ _-..1 Grap_ _ _ Use Pemil OPt Per. ~ ;ZY/~ ~Cdi~2 Na I>ee iu„I, ^ ~R.,~e ~? ~RPa..d -'--- - . -- - - _ _ n a app I ~ ~ 5 nparM1+ w Ina t _ ____ _ Ce y z p T.I ~ ~ ' PI ~ sp..rol C r. F 9 0 . , v. 1 F D _____ : p Cannooor r , _ ~ ..f. C. •' ~rv ~- 'I ' ~~"'~ ~~ / ~ u! r.~~l~~ tr. ._I-..L. r %z~.~_.. Addrnt f(~l~ ~_ _ _-_. _ _.___ .._ ILLF~yL W 7 c a _ 72 _ z ~ - rel ;f_YN_ S ~ `.L .~c ' vAwA.lol+ s % j pC -- -- - - Srore Ov, Gry d Clv,ul, l_t~~_ ~ _ ~ - -~ ~- - lies. No., - PLAN CNKY - - - W A+A., EnOr., nen9ner _- .._._ pERMIi ~ y U U . _. _.-_ _.__ Address ~Ed, FI DRAINAGE CM lip ~~_I Srme of. NM1 E. SYS%EMS E Proposed r r7 ~ ~/~( " S BFAb'iF _ - i ~_ ~ __ ~ PARe _ ~ _ I Fa FI 7~' K ~ n, r ~ no rD. ~• N.w _ Ad~~, ~; ei "I . ; aePa~, ~1, a.ol~eM1, '..J 2 nre>nEn frvraeyrtnasn rrnrrv ~Ir%rr.v a ii !ate col-In~rMTr,nM llrr Bu~~e~v~~r~nl I'mfe~-nn~ [.A~..M r~~ ~(rA : 'II.Hf.N lli H tilrr O H; ~m mmA tY .•lu V ~r /n~~n err rrr.nnr r.. .. r.*i~'e ~ ... ~. rr. .. {~n ..d P..r n.. ~rl'nn~ V `/~ ~ A { O I v.M1~te, se Ile,, nM1n' TOTAI By r ber 6r1 r~. . rr*I i-,/ ~'~w '~. ~~ p. ! DP I{~r I r r rll~n rli^I. ^,. r,tlr rirr: rnxxT.yn,;. IM..r .... ~r": r.~,~o.nxmoe n.rr.,< res., t~ . Hi O w i lilnl Imm^ Mrnl,N mvv r. ri:HTIVII'ATY. M14' 'I; i.MI'fl'~X YP0.M Nr rNkt: k.\' MI'Y.\'F{TIH~ ..4110.A.Yfl: n.. .n r..i. ~.. ... Ar rnnnl.~M rr W ~• Im n.. • rrA JWn.r nn ^1 P•r(..me~.r. ~nr ~rm• nrr n u In Mrnme rulrm rn I.lr mP .~..i i.in .xlr^~ n... n nnr m N.. ~... ,v.m V.....i,n la~r• nr~l.rnm t r.A r ~rA • n ~ A...r1 ~' 1~ 1r I LI (^ 1. Ir 5 M ~~ ~~ r r .n, r n .lr nb~~.m n r r u•~rr{I r~^^nl r~ n r. r .~. 1 rArl rr tl buildrnp PP~mrl xAen praperlY Idled p r'Qrlle M1nd vvl~Jalyd, and ~1 IVblerl to erprrelion a work IA.rev~d.r nm eommmnd or r rvlpmdad ar abu~oonsd for IBp dpn. I y,.. 1 ,q r.rl'v • INSPECTION RECORD • FOVN9A90v IG C<".I r , rY~,.l~ . F r A L s• I r ~ INSPECTION NOTES .. . m,, <.n a « .._„'^ /c~7i r:. I i-_. FLOOR SU9b5?S G'.enreF t..,M1 ~--i- ~t'T-~ _..._.i__~..__--_ _ ._-__.____ BIYn , Svc"+. Aurv., s'~.•~. r -~. ____ ___ __ _ I .. _-_... _ ....... .. _-_-_ -_. r• .n r r. MASONAv Ae~' o .r In ,~cu ~ I Cleon Oor,. dab., _ - . . _ _ _ _ ._.. _ . _. ___ ___ _ -t _ . .. ROOT 540 i:m' + f .m a ra ", '<~' ". FAAMINf. Wn"... R y 6y 9a-r-.v E'n';n i ... ... ... .. .. .._.... _ _ __ Ncr rnq &:.4 I ~ a~nar'• 'r.rr. c.ci• ~I .. INSUTAiION P ~.•., Rvoi.•r, :o.,, anv.n I .. I ... .. ._ _. ... __.. Cnoni.y -_- __ j v . F'BEWRIS M<renl '4r4^ev .e „"_ __.--... ___-_. _. _.. ' Clw<w Por~bl• r i ' INIf RIOR LAI4 [>4Y WgL. Ne'.~I .y $U+Oarr;, Y ~ ~~ logy Jo•m Innl EXiER OR A 4 ~ ? v 4 x 4 a y I ~ - - . _ - _ _ _ ..._.. _ .. .. _ _... _ _.- _ Fwq' s fr a F -~ F F~~ I i 6oY87 I ' ~-- I b, .:..... ~ crr i i ]WIMMIpb YUVI/DYA cFCgV a •: g?5i.i K5 e,dv55'I, Poml~.ng,) E.p L~~~f~:~n tr' Sn mL .-- .. __ ... ............ .~ ~ I ffn.r{ .. .~ n ' L.r.. ~ _ I MISCELLANEOUS 0' a ' e I .,r BUILDING AND SAFETY q city of rancho euildin Z Addr,+ La~r~ W Owner MaJml Addrn J cadr.~ \ c~~ r / 8 Clor W A+cA., o.+lgp, Q Aad:~; y _ ~~~ _~ r ~. _ _. • BUILDING PERMIT pe oer smr,,, ~ cnno, crp.p _ ore. load Np p, '', Uens mn ae ve. op,, R... Ge 9v.ed ~ Reouircd No. ~Lor Size _ rAPN~~~~~ Bed~oorn ~ Bu. __ __ nPWOrN Plan Div IC',',"d;. PPP,wNT .~_-. APProved C ~dC Ln~` ~Er9 ~w. J C.~~Dsl Eip. .. rl $peoal e ~~_ _iY - l- -_._ .. . ._ --Irei.--- _._- on ~ zip -wore r~, rm vropm<e ~-; 59. Fe .. ~I r Sue lion .. f Pmi _ 4r.: _j Re Fer m i. n vnwnnoN s %J ~ ~,~ ~'~~ '', PLAN CHKK _ _. PFRMIi Q 8-.5 F, cen:uncs E'r _ Si <.vrens- - I ... __._ BFAUr:F Orpf4 =~+p,~ ~ s+,P ..,. pn„. roraL ?.c~5 SO Ir'p ft T tt 1 e If ~r ~ a ATpr~ 4 f •I nr rr r . ~,rv l'.. .. ~. ~ n. r~.r~l F.. +enn. ~ I f r M I t (..I op O ~ O V ~ t r R11 M .. ~ mn .r I ~~ ~ mr 1 1 1 I. ~ f^1 ~ ~••~ ..• 11 nd V 4~+ C V ~ ~ '•. ..~ ~' n. ...., ,.. ..,,., ,,. '.,,, r e ;,. ,. ~ .,.,., ... ~,. . .. m....n .. m.. ~ II~iIA ' t~ .~. nll nm. l .1. ~ rl.,. rr•~ .. ,,t ~ ., a r. n,n m. p.m, ~. ~ , ,...... ~ ... ,r.,, ...~. ,,.. ~.~~...... ~, r... ~. ~......., .~~. re, ,.. ~,. L.n-,. n.m. - ._.- ^ \J ~. r a. ~ .e. „ ,.. .. w r .',.. ~., ~ ml n..... ' ~ O u, ...o., ........ ., '., .,r tAif d o building pe+md ..F.n properly Llled oul. vg.ntl and rvLdoled, and a wbjKl ro e•oPOr~on it wcM1 P~=•eurder n rnl rn.,r.n-.d or n mpended a ol:ondomd for IBO Jop I itippr )1~ (;pp. r,~-' • INSPECTION RECORD rour+nenoN Im :~'_'~ comp '«" s•nak-, '' INSPECTION NOTES PaM., edrr, smrl .ar,.,°°' ~ L iy ______._..-.'_._-_' _.. ~ 1 ~' fIOOP llA011S*S ..^,IP^.f RS ___ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ .. .. vrr.. ',.I. Svnm Avn• ORg. I _ _ .. ._. _ _ , ~,! ., .., MASONRY Rrr! =Ia~m L. __ '' _ _ -- .. . Clea+O+!v Bol'v ~ ~~ ROOF SBiC h~~ _ I ~- - a. .., FRAMINC+ vl:v i~' lif i:r .: ; ' ~~ No~p~9. a:n_ ~_.;PF. bar '^_° _ ._.j -' - - . _ ~ - INSlilei'Otl ~ .... R v: >rr r rv-: Se.+d ~ . ' Cau'.k.nP _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ . .. ~ •. FlPFW AIIi ~ 1. vv a^Pxa :. ~ ~ na. h.r [loser=. ut I ___.. ~ ~~ ~ ~ r. .. INLf PI(,JR l1ii. .FI 'NOLr .~~ c. ~.n%'!= ' loot. lo~nl Pr~r! _ .__Y___ .. ~ F%i!AIUP '.Air. 51:1..!. Mr'a+ r.. v.. -.._. ~vP, '. _ _ _ .. _ ... . _ .. . i p.. ri.vy< F' 1 .A _ _ _. 1. ._ .._ _ i L P k , r . ~ ., I __ - _.. .. _ SWIMMING POOL/SPA f%~.i.~ ~ 'aF>cAf P Ilrs ~ ~ _ _.. ffnr .. ,~ ~ I,r,i, a...': ~.. .. ,.. MISCELLANEOUS sioA .r •_ ' I P.., _._ ! rll • ~ BUILDING BUILDING AND SAFETY ION PERMIT R city of rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline, Rancho C~como/nga, Ca 91730 • Tel. 1774) 9891851 ryv. o.z. ro F"" uldin ~ C" ~~ ^( O_- - _ _ Co r_ _ --OG- Retl e aa~ !,, (,2 iLad _- __-___ -<< Na 4Dw rUa<"i<rm~r r D ^ Z Ner,)O~ rem« / -~n^"/ L(<<J-L=~_ . ____ l~oa_ _ l for srze _ TAPNe _- W Ow/nerw II Beboa ~ _ "' ~ - I - _ __ _ IA APProvea Rm Dnr. MorMg _ __ __ - `~' Addua_ Zrp .. iel. So.aml may/ - r L(.x~ ^ eH _- L-__-_-.- _ Co„e~~.. ~-C' --J_~e a ._y~~ _._ Addr<n ~ n _ _ _.. _._ ~r ~yy L ,/ ~fi I _ __ _ W /1L ~~~-'- ~! -1- J 1.f rLAN CXKK a~cmwt f~~ .~-~---~ _ DrtFgnarn _ iel. - _ _. _. F PEAMIi W Anr _ gn, _ _ DAMNAGF Q Adtlrma F _- ~t,o vme E'~ 5vstgo Z ~~ ~ .~ 1 ~ ~ ,.r ea , x. Ire rr~r, ror,~~~ ..7 Ntw i Aan ~ R p ' ' r! l iH T " 5 ~ ~, I w,l n I „ =. ` ....r ~ Of r eMea e~ 1 ril II a ~ ; Si V. N M N 11 O ^ ~ r~.r I r. nnr r. r ~~ rn M I r1 ( ~ U V 1 ..~~ ~ ILI ^ ~ rrrnl.~ nr ern \I Nr ~.nrr m .. n :n.. Ilr.. li. a' ' C I ~ .asua ^` • ~ ^ ~ I O N ... ~. r ~ ~ r 0. ~ ... ..m _.~ r r. ~~_.~ ~ d rn T I - - -- --- ____ r srn ~~ lllliLed n r~gNd orA roL~dotrd, and ~ of letl a V LAh o bmid~ng >e~mrf when nr°pee P ^n!od a ~. d<d o. bu~lo^ed for IBg dayr. d work Ihoreu^Arr 'r eol < ~ m0e^ e.o rm'm ~. ' l t(liA Crrv INSPECTION RECORD ., ..-.,, ' ' Eo...,, A«-r :+f -. ., , I, INSPECTION NOTES iLOOA SLAB'145 ~iRC'.>'. '. - I I Bhq. Snore a~.~. pr. ~., .. _~. i MA:O'v Ar Rr .: ,. .. Cle•e G.•~ '° ,_ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ i ~ - r rn .. ~.-. ~. vl^ POO` ...... .. ._-__ _ . .. Nm 9m.• ~ ' ~ r ~ ~~ ... .. .. I ~ - ~ ~ INSU.AA On - s r~ . ....~ ~~ - ' =L Cno •y . _ . - .__. HREWAIlS ~.,r - . ., .n. -. ._,__- wsFploA iar~. -. A', wAl. ..... ~ I ton,.. lc i-, R~', I . RG F.: 4 I i. ... .._ fIW I - ..... .. ...... .. Clm F ...... ... . ... ... .. i r~o~m ...v d...- ~ ~ ~ I oWIMMINU YUUI/JYN G, AV. ,i IBA. K. ni. wA,~ MISCEIlANE0U5 BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ ELEC /MECH./PLMBG. . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 • Te!,1714) 989-1863 Z nee'"g '77c YlJ?NAG~np C' 25 . rvo. o>•r•re~b-eye-leddnro",. e ~4 1 bd„ p cr< 1:<~ ;,1 1 I ~lrlil ~ Zj~C'~ I ~ f« ~1~--~1 . 61ccF Tr I Lo1 , S „ , _ l, _ _ . L 1 M ; l Own r W . ( a S, IRe:eplades, L~9 ~~;~°~P S IS wy[SrdlFL6ctn~S~~;L fc•:e vii jMe~ar< I /1 ppp ZAP i I LU` ;1NCeidS /c•c it jl3 '~iY-3'I&b ~ ~ I iNP_ _ __ _ _ __. ~orM1~r I - ~ Isoeory _ O _ co tq _ W cr ~/ z E L'/A/(.'h (f ~/ r'~ ~ // I ~~ rJ r /JS ~ LY x<, A4[m,e•Y arep _ _. C _ _ Plan CA4 n:e fee I 1 ' ~. \ / $lala LrC CdY + ~ / a Olacsu ) ? 3 ~}l/ - /~ " rv"~~L ~~ ~ - r,aa F<e _ _ _ I IOTAI EIECTkICAL FEFS W LICLNPFn COATPAr T(r0.P OFlr^I.I a,TUrM r mm o ^ r N No. o•unvxcn rvo o<rrrrpeon fe. .r. nrm ,n L~..m•.r. .w. I .<~ ~'..:, mti .~ vAr.~ mr . ..n me p..r.~. . °"• Cn°r.:"" ' Ki - FPJ •- 5 ~•+L,d ~$ca.r/COmvr. Q _ r ^ W xrp aiu y 4 0 8 inqud_ l vv rpp / I-1hATir1~ ^ nx'x LwPm lnpx I'.vr 1/) , I FAU o /~ ~ I BO~Ie'/COmpr. WJ<BiU \ v 1 HP la IS MV ICO l ` T r + .M rnn r .. ....r.or hmm rn. r.mn...r. L..n. L. m. rn. N I . ~ Re Woll $mP. ~L, ~ /•n Hondler re L y l ' ^ r nr...u a rr • ~a a..~. ..u •n. r • •a ~ r i 1 . n M1 r I n 6 PnnIFi I Arr idl<rw r~ _I S r~n c l •,• . ~..... ......vouv .u .+. . n m. n•n.m ... r. rnn'~n wM1t O rr (~ p Y S l0. dm over ~ F.M1CO •'md I Z .rr....mra ..n.. v u a r r b,. rn...... O ' Z Q i Ve+r fa+ ~ Orhxr T U Inautl DaC I .. `n. srv,.. F« ~ n ~°-- -~ ~ TOTAI MECHANICAL FEES , wr .r r .rr „~. ~ c„ sr, .m n.... y. ..r,r ~ w, ra Lr o I•h I ~ 1 l/ . H i r m . v r ~ e l ° Y 5 ~ 1 r ~ ~ r " ~ i .., .r r ... .n . . ., . .. w ... I~h ....., r ....,.~ u. ... _.. r..n. iw.l. .... ..... ,.... , .n. _..... i. i~..m. a .a ~ ~ rrrr. .., i~~. ... ~Oo- r ' I i I x ..i. .......r .~ i... i. r n ~ r .. rrr.a • gy i-+ C n. n. r ...,.' ., .'., ,.,.;. .,. ... J y F.r TOiAL PLUMBIN3 FEES ~ ~ ~ °LMBG. FEES MECH. T T L ELEC I ~'~ I ~ ~ ~,~ , ., ;../ , i ' r y l _.__.___ .____ u. .. eii ... _. __... r 1 m N o !br .bre~ml/mabnn •TI/nl..r and »Pen Pv edY 41Ld m nv^.~I oad mLd "ad, aad n p o ..e+dr, bn•rdrnaa Ia, IW: nr n. wbia I m e.P n a+ r -o I ,er... n.r r m r..-r-...d INSRECTION REC SPEROR NOT UNDERGROUND CONDUIT __ /~ ROUGH WIRING _ _ _ NEW SERVICE I` ~ FI%TURES _ _ FINAL ELEC. INSP. _ ~~J 7 ~~ TEMP. POWi:R POLE ' OTHER OT_HE_R_ _ _ _ __ ELEC. UTI LITV CLRNCE. 7 '~ U. G. DUC_TS_/REfRIG. LINES II MECH o~rn, tomti. u•, RO _ t . swponr, V..e ~ fAU/AC Unir FINAL MECH. ~_~„h, sn~rol6 I ~ OTHER I } OTHER U.G./UNDER FLR. Soo w., r.,, ... o....~r. w°"',, cos <,is RO PLMBG ( I . s vna+:. fm,n~~o. ~ GAS TEST ] FINAL PLMBG f ~ °n1ve' ' v.... ed v-~,~ WAiE"n 'rii"rc. o.., 0n1v". i ¢ S SEWER/PRIV DVP SVSTEM ~ . .. OTHER CTHF.R GAS UTILITY CLRNCE '~ gr,r ~.nm;G n r, nnlpi m ~~i GAS Plnn~lG ~~~ ~~ „ '~ pP; '!ST ~O~ HFAIfO ~. oil ~Ta^ L;. ~~ I'nnl ill ..'. ql I~HFiv ~_ __ R;';V(t ill rPJ _ _ DATE I INSP. SIGN. 5FW'ER. PRIV. DISP. SVSiEM DIAGRAM W O `W tr I Z i~ O n N N a a~ BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ ELEC /MECH /PlMBG . . . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 RaSellne Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 TeL p1 41 989-1 86 3 eenereq ., _ / v' - Aeeres ~ r `I r. ~ - N ~ D< Ae xom, ee {1 e q~ - < - Q}f`(Tf 'rd~ // I ~}y-~~\ ~ ~ ~ r r[~ r[[ '/'c i LOI 91oeN ra[1 ±J~I ~f L.Y i S e ~ / / I I I/ W - Owner, A[<eprodm P9ns, S~ndwl I r - - - .. ., -1 "_.. Marlrn9 ~ N 11 ' ' ' y Frprn __ ~r~ 1- _ 1 , . , AO<I2xs r . ~ , .. cnr 1 A L iel 'Mp eo _ i _ ' ; __ Conlfacl0 r (~ IISp[V ly ~ / ° p[ - -- S F Area Nrn - L- A~ ~ !f i FrV. q. A[rrd[mial 91d1g -. _ _ __ F A ~~ P I _ _- T GI ~ Zip. jol W r rea <w 9 ~ /. , F , . r _1 rl ~l5 ~ W - P 1 Ac[ u v Bldg 1._ Sole Lre - fury ti ~ Ne" PNl f<e I issua•re pee a aassn - uc rvo ! - J1 - - ~ ~ t TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES urr:xsm mxrnnrtnxa nrrl.Aannrrx M"N ^ e r ~inm r.i m M me i p i~r~r ;'S [f ~m. ~ Na Dervip No Oeraip:ron f.. e .r m l r . e.,s ."e ~ . :r "n m m "rr n br7. u .r • rr, rvn frr . + .f r ~ i _ -_ _ .., n . r C e .6 In/Comer Pe U ~ ' ' . F 6 In_ciud. i rvV Ip0,p60 Blll to _ _ ^ rIN Ykp.Blrl Mt:0. p:'r'I-1M[iirlV (A fAU e~/Comer. Ba [ n.r.r.. 1 .ror.r u.r 1 ,+ ...mol rear .ne c".v,rr.r. 1....... :." m m. b Y An.fpp ABU v I HP o 15 MP I o { .... ..~,. N i ' ' ^ . - _.... .. ...... ... U tee... "rr . ...,.~ . rn n a na r i flr K .I Mandl r le 6 o ~ulo~ . . ., ..w u, i.. rmr.. .r..n m m m " . H[+rm ~u_uu':r~~r + r-r •,•"r.~. n..,."r m.r„e ,ern u..,..r m, O ~r.r"., r,. r„~n u u. m ~ Ar N ~ Sn~nv Bnp ~ ~~ . e r f.haor nerd I orr, io ~ ~ .m nrr,m .,..r ... n . r r .. r...__. Z , „r fan Iar~- - I v nn PI '. nuv" a ire "-''-------'---'--'---- f TOTAL MECHANICAL FEES ~'I .r sr.u. rrr.r r.~.. .,. r~rr ,.,,.,rrr. I , r..r D.r:r~pnor, P:. rn. r .,r. .m,. ,.. . r.•..,rr.. r4r.n ,rr,,, Ir.. r,.. .,. ...rr r.. r, rnr..n ~F,, f ~, ~ S Nor .ern OW 1 ~ N q.. r.e. re f I f. e I J ...., / r Sew rMl t ~w" ~r,O (yv.m ~ I a ... n 1 C 0,0 .~. ? . i yr C'.1 lI 1 ... ., wr ..., r., v. ,,. .r ~.r..l a .-ra ,nn .. r .... rr , ~ n.n n e / . r.. L'unnr. 4n I . ". a. , r. ,y .... n. .,.,, . .. ~ TOTAL PLUMRRJG FEES • , r ~..r..._mr. ...r ,.~r , , r °' T OT ELEC MECH PLMBG FEES ., ., . ,.. . - -- _-~ .._.__- .- v. • ... pre Br Y ,; tp[• r '~~~ ,nA m Na , ma ~ ~r,l/m.reoe •pl/p' .D p[.m~l ., .dv r '^d a r,p"[d wed .el n,x.d, end ~I r ~ r ' , .,n ar,o„ I .c . mr. ~../,r r ,....er. i roei.a d er r .p=•nr ~ r,. ,n~r,do. r.d r[r leo m r ... . rv I , r .1. II INSPECTION REC SPECTOR NOTES UNDERGROUND CONDUIT _ ROUGH WIRING -_--_ -_. NEW SERVICE FIXTURES ~ .. .. I - _ _ ~ ~ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POEE OTHER OTHER I-_ ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. (~ U. G. DUCTS!REFRIG, LINES RO. MECH. o~eh,~feme. n.r. __ SuGOOrp, Veny FINAL MECH. °nu%nc u~5 , __ _ ~(my, inmelb ~ OTHER ~ __._ __. t.. ._ OTHER I U.G./UNDER FLR. ~'I' w~01r' i RO. PLMeG. wo~<r. coCv<~G • S.o>o~y, ib,nmgr GAS TEST FINAL PLMBG, `"""' v~w<r, s<,.~«s WATER i1iR. v<~~, v,i,<,, SEWER/PRIV, GISP. SYSTEM OTHER OTHER i grd~n!n;r n r_, „Hpi in ggI- s'~ GAS ftl PING •~^~<,~oi r<r, °O GAS TI ST ~I HE4iFv o•o <„<. ne Snu, nll y ~.p11 i'~1r: ~iFr '!NA; Pn/1L NI MBG j ~'i FFR I-1______ __ _. L ~ _ _ ItJ1PFt,nON DA'ff ~ INSP. SIGN, SL WER; PRIV. DISP SYSTEM DIAGRAM V~~ <z BUILDING AND SAFETY [ION ~ ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 baseline, Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 91730 . Tel. 171 41 989-1 863 eunmre N D<„~wrm~ IAeae,°°,. e° m .~°I, me.n~iml roe Z Aaerz:: 10778 [b doc Street --°1-__ .__ " __ . _ s<,.~«, ~ O~< ~i t eo 68 emcx nac' 11606 Is°<._ ._ -__.-_/~ _. awpe~ w _- ia«em°a<~ I~snn, s„.n:e<=I _ - - - - _ . I . __ Glenfed Develo ment F-"- "- - Mailin9 T fidmo I aeorcss 16601 Ventura Blvd, h ~ ~`M°m-+~ O °1v Encino 91436 <`7518-905-3053 -a -- IX° `° .- _ --. __J _ .... _F.._- Q t omm Connacm' V lspe<dr I _ Goal 8lec tr8c Inc, pp sn. cr. e,en e<w ~-~ noelea 10013 B, eeh Streec G x<+,a<.eei Amy. ~~08~/ C rt.+f _~. (JJ ~~j c Y C ca n a a~91730 714-980- -' Qe' "°°°'°'r alda 7 J/ C r _ _. _ 6331 w ~O Slate tw Gry vio~ <u ~ grv°c<e Re a c~a::a 398171 C-10 L,< No B)2 v« 3 ~ ~ W TOTAL EIECTkICAI TEES laernaen emm~nnoa+ pvTUannnx Q ~ I M.e. .fOm •, .m , ,x. nom... rM Y mm pae ...i mr No. Def<r.pl^°n Na I DaniPl~°n fa< _ _ n~ r.li,, n'il.~ I r~<' ~ I c• , ° A hd ~ ~ Bode/Comn~. I h loo,ooo An . a ~,. ~ ~ w ~ . I JPm. ~ 0 n.e i n u r e ~ 14011 °r r I, +0°Je C°mpr I ~ ~. ~.., i .m ...mm nT, u. ,...,...,..., o..._ L_ ~-. ,n. } ,oA ow<A*u I ~ , a "v ~ Is "v ` ~ V.. ...., - N ~ le W.. i Su,O I Ar "°~elv ° a Z ~ I .m .. m.. u..w, c. t r , n. ..., Z Ln °A I r 10,000 d. , W < ~ ~ ~ nv~ e ree 1 r. n.~. __.-.. o.vr _ __ ` G TOi AL f1E(..ANI~Ai FEES n . r,a .P ,n .. .,,. ~ r., ' 41 2~Ib m tl none, i ~. D., p m^ i D -~p~p° v« o„ ~.: It-8~ 2 xt andemnily H a °`. ~ :°.., f O I. ..~ U ... y N ~ A.; u. ~ v r Se. 0 ~+ ,r,.l. ... ~ D+• E -, •. • ~ • .• ..' 4 TOTAL W.UMC NG FF.f.S ~ -~ ' ,' .M ' ~ '~~ ~°' TOTAL ELEC., MECH PUNBG. FEES ,j ; !~,x' a ... ,. ._..a._,a.,. -ice.(-- 1` ' -T_-- a r,°«„<d I sP« _~ „z V r~~ -., ,., ___ ___ _________ Nom~l V°I~d°~On i0°le ihn ele. r°I/no,F°n m~/p' +d, .M1m pronrdY l,nrn ° yea and .al doled, nndJrt ySPV ;TON COF ~ +~ei<'i ~° <rp-e~ m + ., < ~F,,.~,. m. I, ~°, rpmm.~,ed .~~°r„a.n o~ °EO~a°~~ , r°, IAn non INFRECTION SrEROE NOTES UNDERGROUND CONDUIT _ ' ROUGH WIRING ? _ NEW SERVICE S _ _ FI%TURES ._. _.- _____.___.__._ _ FINAL ELEC. INSP. 7 TEMP. POWER POLE _- OTHER - _ ._ _.-_._ _- ___-_._._ __. -__ OTHER (r ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE, ~ 2 U, G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES -_ RO. MECN. ovm, c.ms. A~, -_-..__ _._ .. _.. _ __ _ _.__---__. _--_.__ _ sovv«n, v.~n _ ___ _ fAU/A[ UnB FINAL MECH __ __ _ _ _ _ _ ..._. _.__. __-_-_ _. _ ... _ ..... _ . yfnn, snm.w OTHER OTHER ___ Sod, woes U.G./UNDER FLR. _ ~ ~ ~~• .. _.._.. wav, cm. _-. -verve, i RO PLMEG _- I .- - -_ - -~ .. ....._.___. __ ____.._ - --- . . swwnr, emn~,gr ~, _ _ I GAS TEST I SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM ~ f"w,.;, vol.o, FINAL PIMBG - . _ Serrrcm 1 v..~; wl..r, WATER HTR - L ~ __ r,.,. r,l, voi.. .. -_ SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM OTHER % i I OTHER I GAS UTI LITV CLRNCE. !' BONDING nr IT : . GAS PINING u~w~.L, u~:::s GAS TesT I HE'AiFR .. a.~„~a. I NAL PgOI ELF.C IINAI, FOOL PLMBG. /JiHFR INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFETY D.ION ~ ELEC /MECH /PLMBG . . . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 3320 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 31'30 • Tel. (7! 4; 393 ! 3E3 aYrlOmg Na.1 OercripM1On (Add~nans, Commwnol, Indwrnall --~ -- - ~~ ~~- ~ - ---- - __Fe• Amreas 10778 MODOC STREET '. se,.~~.r lot Bloch tram ' 9=< I ._-_-_ .-_.-_-_ _-_..1-__ 1uo 68 11606 ~ . -- ~ "o~nm owner W I:%ecwlrelu. bygbn, Swimnol __ _ _ -- ~ -- - _ -.L_- GLENFED DEV ~ ~ -l ~ Fmw.er _ ____ ~~ __ __ '~ Acores: 16601 VENTURA BLVD i Ma;o;;" ~-' a ENCINO 1436 818-905-306 ~ Q ; Irv m _ ~. I - - omer _ _. _ _ -" Lono-uror u Spea.'v I I , .- O:LYI MECNAN ICAL INC - p[ .--. .-___. _ Fl Arm Ne+ Sq _ __-. Aenreas r . . gal Nmy ` a.r d< C 14981 TELEPHONE AVE V ~ -_ ___ F Area haw S -_-- _ crrv CHINO A 91710 re1714-597-7764 ~ W q. P" """"" B1tln ~ - Cbl Pl ~ - - Stale 4c Ub on Iswpnu Per • P" ~~ b cia:an 433625 C-36 lie No010134 - - ~ - ~ ~ - - ~~ NACI'nP'e ..1 R"TInM LICM9iR M r P TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES \ ^ M . F 1 ~eunp0an n p n Na N O Fe. t m r ,In..n rnn t w,. r r~rr•. u e r a n.. x....~ .,.n v,or ... r..,....n mr t ~' p p . o ar[ ~ r C ~ _ I , r. m mr rvr.. x.n .n.n W ompr ~ Bore FAO ro b mdvJ. , i d 3 nP b l ~ ~ rc u 100,000 BID o _ ^ nM'n'R.ROpJrF:x urrUneirnu ,YiAb o:ei'--` ~ Iflade~COmpr __ .-.-, rn.r I .m rvmrr r.mm rn. n..e..m.. I i..... L. b,. rn. A I W,W] 01'J 1 er ] HP ro 15 HP a Q ~ / / 4.+ , ro o:<..o a ylf way swp d x10 000 dm Ad i, r.,.r .,.i .v, u...,..,.. u.., N.r... ,. r.r ~.rmeM ... ,r-.r ..... Q ~ - v , ~ 1 ~~ll V ~,...,., e. ..mwmn u, r,.,. . ....................... -..x r,..rr ...- V wormn svov Oct A I :.,, .. mm .rn., w.. n a r , . :n..m.,r I F.1:nor • and I o. 4W0 dm ~ a nn ~~ verr For ' I Q i i ~.:ied :. U _ , CM1S. ~r,ro,.. fee ...r r,.r.r -- --...-- .--- -- -- ~ ---- - -- g MECHANICAL FEES roTAL ~ _ o vc..a ~r,N; xx+ ..v ^.r^,,N.mr ^ nm o:r. rm I r.ro~oeor Fee - r x, ,..., ., r r m „r . . ~! , r.L;,..., r 1....., C r.. ,.r. r ,. r,m ^~ W co, srnem I µ~ w, r o. , , I ~. r n„ ..r ~~ I ~ F't 7c 1 ,C[ 1113q L\ ?II SS LOX AMEd ICAS P ... ~ ' Lf 1r.r,o ., ~ wme. worr,r ~ ~ ~~: ~ :.x x. :, ~ :.:.,. .. ...~. ~ 7 fln~ (P~ v e Sew r Onn ~SY,Im I L, nxe r F I r ..n, i Yil' •~ -•" n„r ,r .ri, , r ~_. ,..n,.a n,+. n„ri Z Sruer Con K I-F.n 5 .•.v I J S ~x _ _ _ T.n,: ....;: .. n..'i....; '. ,., m ....... .... .....m: „u r,, in, ivmrLl ~~or., .., ~ ~'i'-~ ~ w ..... ..m....:.......r i..r . < < AWO v.m rrv F ' .:r, mn...: rf, .,., _.. ~ r. ,.,,.. ,.,~ n. r J Ph. 4,: r . vv~.nn •- r - F ~ - rn u u n n. r r.r a x.....c ......c . ,.... n m TOTAL PLUMBING FEES ~..~:, ~; .. ,,. r,. ,r~..m.rr„rwr r..o..,. r.r ........,: „r.w. "' T TpL ELEC., MECH., P t.MBG. FEES ~; ; Z ; ..,, , .. .._ n. P.a ~, .. ed Sn N. ~ ... __1^; 81-TEL. P."HOSE. TVF. _ Nv k f~ ~r:, C,~IA11i CAI.II_'_:r171U -- ~~L /l"~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ No , pX m.r .arn~.al7m.rear~.r /R4mn.d r. m. we.n p~oRxrlr I ~ ~ r,r, :.<e ,:rd .a~nor.a a ~ 6C., ~~ ;.GPr~ mbiat m op on ,I -ass rM1.. e„mlrr n ~ ~ . n•.r nd n r wtpmd•d nr rboraorod lo. I~ ddr UNDERGROUND CONDUIT _ ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE FI%TURE$ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER PO OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS(REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH Dorn, coma. w.., --~-' ' _5_u_ppah_Vmh _ _ iAU/AC UnJ r fINAt MECH. I ___ Yellh, snorox, CT,yER_.-_. - .~...__~ U.G./UNDER FLR. ~ I 91n 0/ - RO. PLMBG. wm.,-; cap v~~~,- '~-- -~-_ ~ __ "_ - GAS. TEST J/ J,~ ~ FINAL PLMBG. °'"'°"` vnl""' <~.I ~ '. IS v ~ V,L.~ WATER HTR '"~9T ._ v„ pd v;~~.< Lf ) SEWER/PRI V. pISP. $YSTE.M OTHER OTHER I ,, , __, GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. ! ~.5,y~ &CM D'NG GAS PIPING ~o"h~~o'~, s.w~ GAi TFST ~ //J FINAi POOL FLEC, ' FINN. POOL PLId6G. Oi HE. InISPEC TION DAiE __ ... I ...... _.. - _ -_. ..._ _.. N 9~ )/ INSP. SIGN, SEWER,'PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM BL4LDING AND SAFETY LION ~ BUILDING • city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 Baseline, Roncho Commongo, Ca, 91730 • Tel. V 141 9$9.1851 z _ __ s Aame,_ 11432 t1t, Baxter St. _ _ _ ~ ( Em ~ ~ emcw nea lp,. ~ _ _ _ oa ~ ~~ c , _ f F+e ow, ' _._ _ _ _ ,__ __:.,,_ ._ _ _ w< v<~ml ~ o<, ae.. ~ d ~~_ _ 12939 1 wp 16 I ~ ^~d u^,1, ~aea•~.<a _ a<,~~~<e --- w , __ _ .. _ _ _- .__ .. _ ~,eer hNRLBOROl1GN DEVELOPtdEIJT_ CORPORATION, _ _ f n e e,^e^, ' f, 1 rEO~ s.re ~ s < 11 ipp ~ "EI, . _ ,y~/~ ~4~cC~'/ ~~ App ~--- L M dm9 Aaa,p< 2029 Century Park East M1550 pP pi r ~Yl. '°''I,~ i E<a - _ : •' "",/'~3'[ i ~ o"_ l cy Los Angeles ~°~ 90067 `13/553 5131 ~---_~ .;„' _ __ O _ _ 61~YtLBOROUGH DEVELOP11Ef1T CORPORATION -_-- - ~- -- .__I Aaa«.- - 2029 Century Park East N1550 c;y np ~ nc guyeleg~~ _9Q{L67 ~ rd _ 2,553-5131_ vnsu"noa s ~/ e. as„~C 94u618__ ._ _ ~~~ _P~. «3>. _ I w A«h., En91.. - STDFFBEGleN-deCOSTER G ASSOC iHTES_ o.,~y^•' pEAMR Q _ , ud~e6 L1 3ll26 Rancho. Viejo RA. N?OG I_ 714/493-066 F oAAwncs EI Gry ``Lp Nape ,L ,Wan ~aDi,Strar~p 92fi75 ~1~<. He yQ _ ._ Sa SYSLEMS SI o . rnnatruct single family dwelling ^ scnunE at<tached garage (Plan 410) 'with """" sa. Et ii ~, •~ 11 s~.< 1,025 + 447 ".. ~. ., r 1 2 xm 1 x .,~. ~ L. ..,,. O ~In ! I I V " V IV .y~+ /J. 1 A.. m< r . ~'„ ... n. . . .. ... ~ ~ n m .r 'O _ 5/13/B6 „~,,, DWRLBOROUGH DEV-..-CORP. <_.m-1 ~ ru r~ by ~ ~.:.,,'.;l _~%S~; -liclti i X971 ~'7 ~~ ~ .~ ..,,,.:°~,1° ^, ,e ' ~2NCE24B11A`r Enterpn se Ins.^ Coi ". ,°:~ < ~~N ' y~ .i~ii.....,A ~ '..+~ r.re '.I. In. on. "u M.N 1r'n.. i ,a C_jl n. "."m.~.M.<"o-ih n~lr. ~ ,i~rA ... I,mn ... r..n• ., ~r...~~ ~r< ^ r n.. n. 1. e n v ..I e.. m i, i~ r q n mw.. ^ -. .•$I~n-EurY >~fk~E'a's"t nl 5~"' •.°~"• "'"'"'-'tu5~_Rtrge~ies-.£R--90067---- 1 6' 1 i 1FU M1 .r Sud L~~a pe,mn ..h<n p•^peay lei•d ou nM p^a m Jo nd, o.d n ,a we upnplmn n .w, '-..r,unpe, 1 mi cmm....d o..v a+p•~tled o obardpreJ (^, IAO dap .1•Ft i ::OVY _ • INSPECTION RECORD • - fOUNDAiION wr. c.,l~r co.,P r.,,, tr~S,:L.. - forms, ge~nl. zr<m o"~~ f..-. ` /L 3 fj Uy ~ INSPECTION NOTES - - -- =r _._ -.-_-__- 91f~ 5 oorr „ ,... r, Ir, v .Z MASp Ar qo•r Inrlcr 14 (~ ~,if~"~;~ n Clecn 0.,,, fN rS{YL~V _ 1^/ A ~ I '. i \ A-..- 1 _ ___ _ _ .. _ ___ _____ __ _ ___ _ ... gOOF f4^n P.c~'.,q ^-rt A:+•o tr.n. .' :. p.. R:.: ..~ n ~ r ~ .___. . ___________ FIAMVIG W-a4 Pcil Is': Bbrv~nc A~n: •c _ ____ _ f,v., rni. a. _. Noumg, flni-. ~ . .. nnpN P , M' U RV ' d ` _ - ... ._ .. _.._... .. ; . : rn, .a, ; .pon n I Cnoi6op _ / ~ . PREwgIS V nl R L ~p _~np r.~ po r~ ~ ~ ~ IryifglOR IFL~ i~4'r WA.I .u irn Poper, Th~cgrn, I l ' -,- - 1~ c pWIMMINV VVVI/SPA '~, fx, nv -r'N. uraa.;R< Rmf,.;>: ~<,.,,: nq, i Pr bd Vim P, ... ~~.i ~., _ _. .... v .-. iMP. :, i.. .. MISCEIlANE0 U5 i I i i : I n-, .' BUIiDING AND SAFETY D~fON ~ /MECH EIEC /PLMBG . . . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 R aseune, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 97730 • IeL L/14~9be-ttstia Bmldinq Nv D n lAdd~~~ l C l d m p F 11432 MOIA^fi BAXTER STREET nao oenp oe anL , in on'maov ii . -- - - - - - ------- - - - - ee -. --. -- Z mss sor a< 1 ; L°I BiaM i.aci 1 j IS V< 1 0 00 W nO 12039 A) ~ ._ ~ o<li<r, _. __ __ ___ Owner ~ IRe[epmdm LgFb, Swea F<s - Mailing } Fr~mea eaaxess 202 CEMURY PARK EAST N ' Mozart CiN Zia tee J InF ea. I ~ 0067 213 553-513 _ om<• - - - - _ O LOIIIIdC10f (~ I$pe[•lY C - - it R.ea flew S _. _ ' J PWIQ55 ~ q a«m«1~a1 Blag 1025 @~ .O1 10 125 e F M N - 1 W CiIY Tio iel W ew Sp. eo P<, A.x< „r eieB 447 (a 2.24 4- 1 1 w __ Slap 4c Ci`i Floii Cel na.~-« fa F 7 BO n cMSS''' ~ ~ c 1030035 ee - ... -.- < W 1.¢cxscn mxnu+oxe ucri..x.nns T CTRICA! FEES OTAL ELE 2g<qg n J Q ii. ~~ n ~e m ~ m. ~ J fAU~a A ~ lue ~ 1 Na a Cemno.. I e~ - ? F o d In lutl B YP oC.UW 2,U ~ '.a n'r ,~w ^ y fnu w as rr Comp. < I t ~ ,n. n rm n. ~. ~.. in. S Y ,., fw „I~BP rm ma e - ~~ ~ Hr Nl ~ -np i b~ Hc~dlo b 6 _ T r,,.,. ..u. a...ne•n in. " .n ~. ~- - b Q M.-.... L:..J x0,000 dm ~ .. .e . a.-..m . .. ~n ..~i Q ' ......... ....w.. a e. V ~ so .v Boor. ~ A. Boed'. f Z O I .m ....r~. i., w s r r, u . Z 6xv.n rood e r<iOhq dm Fay Om ~ 1 . .. L.Iw ., '.L v i.:. ~... i .u.n,,. n. na. __ -- _ - .. ^' -_ _' _'__ ._' .-___-__ ~ TOTAL MECHANICAL FEES •i n xax in - 1 S I _ s" W D I I ~jt1sAJ __ P.~~ ~5~33Sz .. ~ i O ~ n ® u i <., ~. . l N P S.w I nx.ni~ ~n ~, i a a rio•v a...~ Y., m i V ' ~ ~ ~ .. ~ , ....,., .~ . , ..., .. ,., .. .. 1 ~, b.. f -„ ~ e.., i n,.e O .. m ~ ', ~~d f T ui,<, ~J 1 I ` ~ .,. ~...,a .... e. r..., n ..r...,.e ., w J rn- .. v.c+ N a TOTAL PIUM(SING FEFS T I C L ~ ° ~;.- .~: ~r °° I ~ ;'~,fa.~^^m..m?;ici °,.ef r ~ .~ ° C. L ~ T OTAL ELEC.1 MECH.x PLMBG. FEES z9 4g < ~7 ' '~ ~ ~ i A.,l. .. , . , , ,__!1_x1 _ ..~ ~~ Pio aeaed tne~ ~ w.., i ~ .. _ 1 G31 INgKET 4L-~. UPl1T ~__ 'M ce~a V, .'.. ~ O(1^M({~ ~ .CAFv FLY 9-1-F2P.--..--- Fo No • Vr~lidai~or ': ~l< m IAV n rd/mvAOr-of/r',mb~9 0•~r r - pmr~~ly tilled o np.^d 'ed . J~da1M, and U mbi~xl m .. v. oro~ i ..c 1 e..,,,,.d...v ni a.~~m....o - .~ne~d•d ~~ vhvndvnul lay 'e0 dryx. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE HXTURES _ __ ____ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER ~~~~-____~_~. ~~~- OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE, U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES _ RO. MECH. ou<n, came; e..; ... __ 5<'DDD'M1, venn __ FINAL MECH, rnvnc u~u OTHER__ _~ OTHER I ~8~ - .__... .___-. _ ... _.. ..._i ...__._. ... ...__ _.__.. u r. n w~cu u o so~i, wm.., I I I RO. PIMBG. wai.,, cap;--l: ~. -" -~ _SOpponL flmM1 n_9v GAS TEST FINAL PLMBG. °"'.'m. voi.~r, I WATER HTR. °`~~' a~~,"`~a,"~ SEWER/PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM ~ j O?HF.R i OTHER ~ I GAS UTILITY CLRNCE 80fJ UIN(. U G. CUNUU'~ i GAS PIPING 'v-",. ,~ `•p'F GAS TFoT Hf .TrN v... ;~,.cr .. ~ i •,~~n ~r' Flbnl fOcJL iLFC, I FlNAI FOOL 'rLMUG. I /1PiFU I INS"Fl"TION DATE I INSP. SIGN. SEWER; PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM EIUILDING AND SAFETY •SION ~ ELEC /MECH /PLMBG . . . city of rancho Cucamonga PD4 410ar PERMIT 9320 Baseline. RanchofpFn . Co. 91730 • Tel 17 7 41 9891851 TT .ti // Buddrnq Ha oa<..nem IAean:om, eamm<+: gal, md~.n~aq ca _ Z ~Aa+=++ 11,432 nOUNT PAXTER STREET. i.m 16 ~ s<:.r!<: w o:,.~, 7k_'i~2~% - - F 155. oa.I<n - MaArng RII~~6 pp~~ttttg(;pII pp .yry,e„~DZyOC6PTURYE1~RRp£Eft15<( P ~ W ) Iq«e0roalu Lgmv. Swn!FUl F~.ra.e+ e . ' /'~ CALIF ~ 900b7 213-553-5131 - A N mom++ r Conl,a[rG J iY> ea I LL _ IRVINE WEST FITG AND AIR 10rho O ,wd,n, 638 SOUTHERN AVE. V ~ isp<aly I Cly ~Lp !<L r~ Sq it Area t^ q•vdnual PIAn In _ ORANGE CA. 42fi55 l 714-921-0800 W sq n n..a r:.w w $lele li<, Cily J qet A!«atOry PI.]n (M1' L< rva 6 Clond. 468609 w vla+ Cln I I wq, n v« !<f« 1 W s nrrr r.u'Pxsnr rav.aA+v+ .ann... ^ r m m +o TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES Q r r,, x,.....,...a r,..r...... +.,e ..n m, i wm~.. .. rwr m... ..n .nT+ ~ No a' Or :!gpr^nnn nni ~ r mm~o^ I < - r ~, ^ a u W,tpO BW I i n l n l r ^ n °n N +AO a a c ... .. N Iw no- P r I.. v v.~os. r ~ iu an .'ui. /vim J .. I, ~ It ~Or; +im '- A 9 as _ a r. n..., . u . r Z O r,m .nmr+a, ur +~ u a r , ...n. .a.. Z Me d. ..,. 'or. 7 00 TOTAI MEl `i Af 'ICAL FEES 099'+'1 ly ~tt•"+b[fl'YCt iNDL^NI"P . . D•. ~+~ n .pr oa I r=• ., r V +i e ... U .. .,. ...,~, ..~.. ... .,~... ~ A,~o .. ~.+ :, , N TOTAL PLUMBING FEFS '~ /µ' ~P~ . f TOTAL ELEC., MECH., :.MBG. FEES 1J~ZC ~ __. __ . ~ r, ma+eA ^ Sna N .. "' ~'~~ - "GhMY.-AV-Afl9Hf'' P ~ ~ I ~ 1,I I qn. ...q Vn6An+wn .p< . Yo I rn.+,+„~,..r,,.rp.,,.. r~r,.,:a",...~ r.,.m~wmn p.nra~.l _..n .I..~~+r r..r+ .,~i.,l ro r. o• r ...r .. ~, . I-. ~ .,...,I ,, r +. n ..n ~I,a, •n ra, ~ nor INSPECTION I UNDERGROUND CONDUIT __ ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE FIXTURES _ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POV.'ER POLE OTHER _ _ _ OTHER _ _ ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. D'JCiSi REFRIG, LUdE$ RO. MECH- o.m. c~m6. ~e~,. - . Suppom, Venli ~ FINAL MECH. v^u/^c w.. V_enh, SM1ulalh OTHER OTHER U.G./UNDER FLR, so~i. wale,, Gm, Suppmn RO. PLMBG. ,wve~y~e~~o,"~a, GAS TEST FINAL PLMBG. v"'"'« vea<,, 5<i+rz WATfR HTR. v.,.,, vai.<,. p .,rv• Re' ., .. ~ SEWER(PkI V. DISP. $VAEM OTHER OTHER GAS IJ 1'0.1TY C! RNCF. 67N DING ~i nr Iii ~A`i PI CI N'"V ~, •n.....: ..,„ ~~ C: r,¢ ir.;,i h 41FP''. ,~9,.,, ,., N i I I'7()I i~~ll i.i/1 r/1~,. PI MP~~ D ~'I 'r: DATE~IN$P $!GNS!GN. $EWEP,: PRIV DI$P. SV$TEM DIAGRAM .BUILDING AND SAFETY•ISION city of rancho Cucamonga oaon Manfmn Pmmrhn C.,ramenea. Ca. 91730 • Tel. 171 d1 969-1651 Z O ~..~..~ W ~_ Z O V c C N ^Q, W ~ BUILDING PERMIT wdebp Q A C,G "p rrv~ ac. Addr.x c ~.I , ~ sro~.ei eo r _ __ erooP T-. ~ ~ ~ lur elaF nn oa. Re.. w~ P.,mT o<o - o o ~ l 9hi1 No. It --_ Aegw.ed zeou~,ea lo.d unlu ---~ - -- ___ 0.no APN No for S.:e (,p , &dieem~ Srte N.odirq ~,, Add.m ~~]-~11S1~f56 ~:P. :~°. __._ APP~pv /-J PP~oved pppmved Plan~p-!_7 n9 Nrv. 1Fre glst. eiy iip ieL ~ Spniel L .an°::o Cucaren. rl n oC.n_1,y3 cona~Nn"r cwuonm Pat's '~-'sonr„ _...-- - .. ---...-..- -- Aae m - I 1 - a _ 4~ = - __ . ch _.__ - P n nT r- Jia onti Jar I . Z.. rd. I _ god-71,5 .. ~ vAlunnoN' t ~.< f _ ---. Sbb 4c C"r 6 Cloud.^CC `:'_^~^ _ lic Na._ _ Cllr __x..~J._.. _ RIAN Cf'.KK ___ _ _ _ _ ..... ___ M,A„ Fnpr. I PFAMIi .-~r,- f G _ Dnlgn.r __. _ _ _ _ __ _T ______ Add~nl ~~~ ~ liel F pRAINAGF . -- ' - --_ } _ CIy Inp 1Ym<n E Sv5iEM5 ~ I o _- 0opwed ~ _ ..n. ~.. ~' ...., ..... .... ", .,....,..... ~ r.. _.. a i " S BfAUiIF , _ _ _ _ __ __ _ ~ . . u ~ LAAC I _ __ __ __ O' EA ` ' v~ d~ So,o ' rro pmr TOTAL ' ~~ .~ $q Fl. ~I: a Jw ~ yr r.f ~ So Sia !~ pe V ~ ~ i vndl.. ~ Caw._ / ~~ 11 ~ ~ O ~ i Nen Uy Add j ~ Arer ^ Repm~ ~ ~, i~~~,~~ . I.IV I~EI'I.A0.ATI X u'nflNY. x r M[A I.ICi:NEED fnMRAtTC.Px nP .i:t:u '"I r nu. mm~ M , I I ,N M I (r ^ L ,.n~l~ w ; •nv 5.. PW N~ AU i ; ^ ^ _L m ® I' r , ; . .., , . . .. rry . n .m . imn L,u,.,.. a , ,In ..,n^ '.l ll^v 11 ~ ~ - r, o __ n... "• v". vrx-erum~,x nrn.+x.noN " ~ ~ ~ . ei.d n,~~n ~. .° °w " ~ ° ^ v_ rf ' :;: •••^m r„w .r r"nev:nr. Lie ~` I E.,.E..a„m m.~o .m r ^ nwa. , .n n n n..~u O N r ox xnrverr RR exi:xrt~ r . . , ^ ..a.. ~:.. c u.n n..,,.. ..n r.,r,...., lana„,..... • M •, b ^ n i x wr Kr.RR~ cnxvxxaennrv IIR IJ, ~ M1I ' ~ v 4L .i ... ", n, n ,i ~ u w r w IIIWI nn~ n.. " M I w i ~~,' y erlnM • /nr wAai I~Ir i ~np ~ x ~ ~• ~ „a fM•. l ^. w . mn.w ~ . N rnm 1 ~ n.on~ ~e , n•u u:i. ,r ."i ., n.. r.n, Div ,nd N 4Yn., ~ vqi ~ .1 Yµ I/~e e; F.e ~"TrrlYl , I NIN AR R " ^ , ,.,..A,I ." ,"~...,. ^,"F; ::'JS: ;,. m.", .„"...., ^ ~ yF w LN..N.m. ''o~ue '~'eai ~'11 l..,... m .n. .~... /1 ; r cl ~ 7 r " I...I., , Ana.....t2 `e _ _ _ ~ I n... . . ,.,L .. ~„ .w~.,,wa.~ ;` :; :~: "i ~ , ' • n I "' ." i : m . r,,.a , ~.....,~ I. u. ,°,L.,i , r ' ,a. ; " ,; n i I 4 n R ~ n A 1' ~ I ~ M X n. .,.p ~p p~~ ~ I r m, e^ r u n v,nr n ~ ~_~ i ~ i.,n O I ,m ,wm° .,".Ir Fe _ - ~[I•Yy P l.nxun nl R T l n l __ __ _ _ .. ...~ • Y•,I,v Ad.l~w ~~ r•a ~ 'J ^ '1 u,.. _- - - _n-,.~_-._ _- IOIIC . R. r... xxx ~ ibi. n buildnq permit when p.oprvlr Ln,d o ngned orA robdaYd, and I wblxl to ;f ~ "R f'.i)F`/ ..pi.olmn :I wc~i IM1.,.°"d., ~~ .m mmme.a.e .. ~~ ~"II •°e.e r .b..d...a m. Im d„r~ • MSPECTION RECORD • ' , wuRdoenoN: Icr, c.Hir. temp. r<m, SMbpaM, INSPECTION NOTES fwm, Aird. SMI, E<w.mnon. ROOK SlAtb5T5,. GItDERS: MnA, Vap, terrier, qk„ Spem, .4cma, VmH, Tr. Lmbr. MASONIV: I<ial., M%br 1M1.. Grad UEH, ClromOuN, BeIM1. - tOOF $HTG Npilin0. Dioph glocYing, Mprerial Grade cnd IDidnas, Rod Dram. fRAMING: Walb, Rah., Db., tlmba0, tracin0. Nailing. IvhinO. Divphr. Droll Slo%. INSUEAT!ON. '•mYaen, R9olYO, Ppie9. Swad CevlAirp. fIREWAlLS~ Mammal, ih:c4nms. Dampen, Dmra. ~~ ~-~ -~~~---^-- - Clown, Fm:ble Lab. ,_ „____ INfERIOA IAiX/DRY WAM Noilin0, Sepporry, to%, lain) AeinL ESTERIOR lAlHI SIDING MnM1, Fanmen„ laps, __ FepeP ihidneas, Bocbny. fINAI InriPfCiION fin:fF Gotlin9 Cerl.l , 51ope ~.... ~..~.. _... .._ .... __ ... _ ola.l r~.r.f ~-.pi f:.~ e~.y/~ vlP 1::nr, ~f fne Doom [+in. lx4in0 Deno. Wndmgs. Gr`~E~'+~7 ~~~ Houu Vumben. WealAar Sn.pp~+9. PI/En - - - -- - -- ---~-- --~-~~ ~- Rr Clao )WIMMIN(i VVVE/M1YA _.__. ___. __,_. _ __. _.______ -_ EXCAV REINF SfrBACK& Radms 511., fbndmg.l I ~ _ ExP Sod, Ramp lac„ Sachage. Sya Irlenl. ~_,.___ _.I _. _- ---- fFNLb GAi[S °e :M. C'v.•. A Lo1cFO. Sbr .v r r p iNPS iNSVi: i.i,, vx, vr. i I . . MISCEILANE0U5 I .. ,. r .. - ~~__.. .-L _ 1. _ BUILDING~AND SAFETY •SI N~~'~So6~ ~ • city of rancho Cucamonga 939n ananlln. 9~nrhn n,rmm~nno. t c. 91730 . iel. I7 i41 9891851 •--i y T G,aPmea ~ - /~ - ~ - ca.n.~~l,aC--sttl.0i~/!o - .f?n/«fi w - k fr ~ na D. BUILDING PERMIT oa-~---- - brio o. uee r<,mn ~ Do. Rrv. load ~ Jn.h legmrtd Repoimd aea,oaml j s~,< _ APPrweo APPrm«1 ApPmved Plan Div. Eng Drv. _~Fre Dul. Special VAW ATION f PLAN CMKN ' pFF+nli ~~~ FI DRAmACF EI SYSTFrnS r 5 REAUT~.f. ~ - I _ - 1 1 Pnae I i I Zoe FI, ; Sue -..e ev v-h Sve ~ Vr'er _- ~. P._' .~.. '. .,.~,r. r.oT _ 01' Nev, ^_ , Aee "_~ A.., _~ e<nan [~ c.+.ai~~a,~ ~~' •.a l / % ~ /7r~6 l ICRN~RP fr 4TR.1 r'nRS I~YfI .R,TInX (1 n vlfi. RFPa fnNVFIX R.1T111M i R1 ~ \kA1I~IX ^ Ile J r ^hw n 1 ~,M. .Im ,yv .Ilion of I~ivlMUn~ •v ~( IIr Pu.in.~ vn.l Ymt~on. r..l. v~v r. ~V~, ~ br•Yrr. ~.mu.n.ri.~n Inrvr.'mm n. n ~Ii.A mp ..~I i. r. 2 1" I A (1 O +or . I.I N Nw 1 1 1 n. w~ I ~~. A R. ~r ~! n r .,v .nvv a ,FRT fll ~ np,• n.~ ...vim r ARFP9' fTINI' N~ PIIINSVRA Y(f. ,e I lr n n !~ I....... . , n. an r, In. ev vN.ef IMY.r 1 im i V ... ... .. •,AM.m l I m!nn~n•XnNx+rimr vv l..t ~~. r vnrl Ir n .nl ,..a.rv ~~ .n .n vn 1 rv. ,IN ~~ f„ , ,.,r.. ,. nm .,.., I.. wn....,• , ,. _ ~ ..._ ...,.. _. .I ..,,. I. ....._ ,........ ~ ,R. ,. _ _ ~ .,... _., ,. ,,. , ..,...,.. ,. , ,,, ,, , ,,,,,,,e. ,. .R. .,~ Ta O ~ .m .,.nm v.n.. W- _ ~ :^• ~Xv Sums i. ~nf Acell .n, ----A,.- -- v a ~I- ~ M ll.ne R.I.I,~ mn ~, a midrnp p./mn .n.R P. a.dr FI'.d a~ , a..a and .apeal.d, ~.,e „ rvhi«r la ..p;,axo..F .aa es.,..Xe., „ x.al .amm.,,,.d o, ~, lalp.na•d o, ada~aa~.e ra. Iso aar, . 1r7121'li'Y ;~ ~ INSPECTION RECORD fouNDAnoN. IGr. e.nd. camp. Te.rv. seroaar, INSPECTION NOTES farms. Rnni. Sree1. &m.vevn. fIOOR SLAB/ISrS.. GIADEAS" MnF, Vnp, 4rriu, RI19„ Spam. Accra. Venh, it lmb.. MABONRY: Reial , Mprmr IM1 Grvvr flip, CImn~Ovh. BOIh AOOf SXTG Npil.np, DiopA. BlorYing, Maln Grvde vnd iM1la mr, Aool Drmv. FRAMING. Walls, PaX.~ 1tls_ BlxNng, Brpvmg, Nailing, Bp[IIn9 Oipphr Gmh Sro%. 1NSUtATION: i~;bns„ A.Valun, Prprng, Spvnd Cnulllnq. FIREWALLB Mplenal„ iMdnm. Dampen. 9wn. Clasen, imrble ImF. INTEAIOA. IAiM/DAT WAIF Norlrng, Sepparrv, tv%, Jmnt Aeml, EbERIOR IAill'SiC:NG MnA, fonennn, lope paper, TAriYnev, Bnhmq. FINAL MSPECil011 inaA Grod.nq f ~ 3'pFe PF VeI ~DVC V o.l~nq ~CrJ to In I Naw< r.um Lr vl, Vr:nrln (Inpia-n p, E a oea, $WIMMINP POOL/SPA EXCAV Rf lrrF 'FC0ACK5 pod::'. "~, ibM"n„~ ,; ~,,.r...,a. ~.,,,. E.n `od r ,p la. h.r l ._____- __ .._. .. i f:N._E. ~. .. I, -.. ~i n r. .n Iru,: fn.r•., •. ..~ l MISCELLANEOUS S ~. _ ____ _ __ _ __ ~~ F__ _ _____ .. __•~ .. } _---_ j r .._ _.__._ ..___~.. _ „3 BUILDING ANG SAFETY city ot` ranch H ~ ELEC./MEfH./PLMBG. ion a 1714 909-1851 PERMI iBIeISr Ha7U/~Q LULU iiG NO/NY//. ® rrt.xxsn ro~RlnnM aBs nr<r.n.enmV, ^n m. r .rs .M v l.w..'fal:. nxnw nCll.nru mrr.nnnnn. rMr I nn .,mmn fnan rn. u.m.ew,r L..n.. L. Ln an. ~~ , .,. nN. ~ .~n .m ~r .. I .. ., m i...... u . I r r., rn. r..«. cn _ ~Sne _ _ _, _. __ _ ~ OdIe4 Fnl IReupmams baM1rs, Swpc_ __ _ _ _- - F.r _ -...-_. -- '. Morar_ IMR e o _ _ - ~~IOme !u~< 1 Sp. ir. Arm N<x Per'denrrpl BId9. _ _ __ ___ _ _ $q fr Aren New ~' Rer Aaeuory 0rdg _ - . _ ~. _ _ _ _, _ _. I Pro.. Cn, ma se R<. h ` Fee _ _ _ TOTAL ELEQRICAI FFES fro Dnv,rycoo Np ouorprro_ • ' fAl; re n •~a~a gpJ.~iccnP~. fAU owr ?dr cemPr. I Iro WO BN o er3NV O15 MG ~ nlr Wo'ii amp I Au Nc~J'e a 6 ~ cr ~ v~o n' 1 ° a _ I Ar NO+dlv f , r p,._d V {I c 19000 Jm r Fa'r j OrFe 4d u r C*~ [ ranrr.e ea TOTAL MECFIANICAL FEES ., o.r.. pr o.. p.mnP„o.. i ,- I ~, ~ ar., o-r<I nwl„ '. Info .,. ~, r, e ' war. " •Bnrlrun IR'roe Sew 5r.... 1 ~.rC Bnr.n r ~ rn &+1 :rner , w I • r. u-.... '040 . il: ,L i a .n re Fee TO TAL PLUM KING FEES t hr TOT L ELEC., MECH., FLMBG. FEES ~ J . r. P'/^ ai~p'.mn., . , a .,n r ~'.e o~~ op~.x ooe .ondor.e aid r.n,., ~~ .•P o a. •a., , ,•, r ..r „ ...n~. ~r .-e<d ~ xep~eo~.e I,r~ ra eR.r UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. OTHER OTHER ELEC. UTI LIiY CIRNCE, U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH. oucn, c°mn. en, __5uo_own,. vme _ _ FINAL MECH. r~u/~t u°G _. __ Win, snoroHa OTHER OTHER-^_ --~~ ~ ~~ U.G./UNDER FLR. s°,I, w°r.., G_m_s"vwn RO. PLMBG___war6, ~°,; vmu - GAS TE51' FINAL~PLMBG. .°'""'' pp1yj' 5e,.,:ea WATER HTR. v.m, va..,. SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM OTHER OTHER GAS U7I LITV rIRNCE. EONDNG j nc rnn~nurt _. __.__ GAS PIPING Nm.~ ° ° i GAS TEST HCATF~' ,~ „~~stim~~.r iuill POGO r, F.(. FihAI PDO~. fV.1°r. ~' ,iM^ ~~ -_- - -. __. ~ -- - SEW Ek ~PRIV DISP SISaFM UTAGGAnA DniF I INSF SIGN a~8-8.~ ' EIVILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ ELEC./ME(H./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9329 9asellr.e, Rancho Cucamo++ga. Ca 91730 • iel !7141989-t 063 awltl:n9 h'o Dncnvl:on (Addrbo_ Ccmmere:ol, Indmumll _____ Fee Z Atltlress / / Sern[et /oO ~/~F/~/~~(/~/ ' ~ T L01 BICCk ild ~ Sire =-~'-.. f~ --- - '~O~ W Own W oeanmu +.g M. SwnrFm! _ . L.. Atlere ~ N '~emcn G s D l C Feeo~ .. 1 __ l - O Conlrael0r ~ V I RPenly I _ ~ S9 f+ Areo New IJ !f~/n M1 ,D/ -~ AOUress F~ Aet~dv iol Bltlq. l~'y~.J _ V $~ Fr Ai ea Nvw /7 r~ W CiIY O I'e~ W Pet Aar++orr BIdS /// ~ A. 3 _ \ Sale Ue Gliv v~°~ ~~A ~ won< Fee / n elassil D~ ~ ~O fee ~ . . q( ~ TOIAL L.1J murnurnuanrTi..nannv ELECTR;CAI FEES .~ Q IfY s In 1 cvl ... w .. eN. .. ~ ~ Dm +P oc Li I D. vnan Fee_ _ /i, rt,: ,. .,r~»o A ,e ~ ~ , ~ moaa >rv ~ a e 1 nP x+:t .a.. ~ Bq U ~.e- 0 C ^ w .n . ....... . .. .. u,. n. N OC OM. P„ 3 nP IS uv I'~ /~ I ~ Z O•.. ..m .n.. wn. a n. ... a .tI fc' ~.. ^nl0 do __ _ __ W ~ e I~':' _-. .,,, ,. r. . TIJTAL Mtfrarlic AL TEES V ,..., ,.. , i .. „ / .. I ... __. ~I o m:..,.: ~ ..~ .. ., o,.:, ~ 6 r.. ~' ~ ip~gi P,ip~plNG FCES .. .r .. ~ ._ ~ . +.. ~ TOTAL ELEC., MECH., P. ABG. FEES J~ Z ;,) Q1 ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ -.~ iJ., om~.+,ea soe. t,o - F~.. S~ ~ r:. ~ - 1 ~BV •~~ ~ rnl/m.rM1nn. rIL { : ~ .Fey tn. .d nM raLdn aM ~: ~1'~ COPT +.nwn m r.+ ~.: I ., . I~.,n.. ..., .. n +mn.~da n, ,~ .~d:.d m,~iso.:n. INSPECTION R PECTOR NOTES UNDERGROUND CONDUIT _ _ __ ROUGH WIRING __ _ ______ NEW SERVICE _ _-___-____._.---. .. __._~ FINAL ELEC. INSP. --_-_._ - --~_~------ - TEMP. POWER POLE -~_ ~_- _-,~ -- _. ..__--_-.. OTHER ~_~_.._- OTHER ._______ ____ _. - ____._._ __ _ --_ _~ ELEC. UTI IITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES MECH. o~rn, cane. ~~~, RO , _..._ _ .. FINAL MECH i . v«,n, swrox. __ __. .._-.__ __ _ - ... ..._ _ _ _ _ _ ._.,.,_ _ _ __ _. _____ .-_...___. _.._.. .__ i OTHER OTHER sa'I, wnl"' U /UNDER FLR G , . . I SEWER/PRI V. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM GAS TESi I _ _ v~dwe,. vm.<I. FINAL PLMBG ~ . s.~.r<„ ~ ~ I Vml, Vplvei, WATER HTR._ P,r ad. vowe ~ _ .I _ _ SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SVS7EM 1 ___ ._... __ .. I OTHER OTHER GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. ' 9CNDING l i11. i l IN l)I III n n IPIN M1' ole~rnL <m GAS P G GAS TFSi v,.,r sem.dl - RNAt PGOL ELFC _ FINAL. POOL PLMBG I _ 01HER _ I INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGN. 'BUILDING AND SAFETY ION city of rancho cucamc 9320 Baseline. Rancho Cuuamunya, Ca. 9. i3G .Tel. Ban essR ~O ~/ .S tic4~ J_ON Z tol /~ Block nacl / ~, ~ ~ 7 W NO OwnBl RINGEV IEW INVESTMENTS neere::°B 1505 E. 17th STREET STE. 216 O crm SANTA ANA ~~~2701 ~`I com.zn°r SANTIAGO AIR CONDITIONING J AaaIB:: 231 W. R[,UERIDGE AVE. \W c,IY ORANGE ~~092665 x`998-1600 / 6 W Ices:fi 269496 C-20 !L~oB NO 000634 uceMBCn rnmaer I w .rrmr ,n ..n, nH,.r,...B . m...,o.., r..n ...I m. ^ r)Wryl'B.BVII.nB.B IrIr IAPAi111Y O II ',^, ';m„nf •'I~ rm":nm L.duH•`b n.'.r,..nnm .: `ArwI..I Nr.yn. .. ,..,.v f,...f.r....r.. ABA '.x „~.,,, ,(;N878-5227 m,,,,, I ND__. INDEM1IN ITY ~.,A 1. C~ n...r. :...,.n.~r ~.. , . „.,.,~..m.,,I.rM~r.,~,1_~~.._r~~r, ..,. a a7 ..., .__~~~__I_v_. rii,uERtDCe IwF`_.. . ~, nIL1NUII, .( 1.__~26Gii ___ ~ ELEf./ME(N./PIMBG. ,,,;-~ PERMIT No Dev n IAdda~onr. Con ml, Indm rop Po v,peo merr rr ao.rtes _ _ _ IS~e< _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ 1_ _ _ Oulllrt W _iFecep'otlev LgMy, Swtldm Fn ~ Mal J IHP e Q omr,~ U _ _ Isp<fa, _ . _ _ __ _ J .. pp Bo. R Area Nrw G F.f d.rl,d aldp Ly se Fr A:.o New J Fef Acnvso•Y 91dp ('~ W Pim Cbf r_r ,~ara F.. TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES ... :. ..,,pr.,,,, ^ r • n invlod ! IBaJm COmpr, FAU ro 6 / ~ f~ rp0.tl0J 9LU ro 6 Inalvd l HP to FAU ove• Ba.l,~ Camp ~ Y 100 CM 0*U over ] IR •o IS HP A w,"~ S.vp wordy ro 6 . I Q I f Wren r I rlutl IB.C~ dr' i Smut Boo"~ I Pu Yrtlkr ~ r.r, o 10 ~0 dm r Mood r •f ' a e.r, hr B: o ' _ , 4 w ,.. „ ,;:... ,.~ I.r ?GTAi. MECHANICAL FEES np n.,_ r.. •h ~ D.n•.pcrr W po ~wr~„ v we•. Co.. ~ ~ Ip~pl~~ N i'rr p e f } ( /) Per .nv Sew Z I „m 5,-r, n.r OpR ap m„rmr' nmrr a N:f rt ~ P'u .n. ` vu,.. .< a ICTAL FcUMBING FEES TOTAL ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES P~o:.nv. l Sp. ay ~ Coed Pn , Vnl,bv nn Dore Na ' /Q~VV f /~; ~ irr 1 ~ ~I S ~', rU vr~ _ _. 3s ibn ml~mrvl vm'n /plvmb~na p wlY M1IIM oul rolidnled, pnd a mbieal Io ap o a r •o•f u....,rdr• +nr •ommr. rm n. v rvmrndrd orrobo~Jon.a Ir~ Ip dop. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ROUGH WIRING FIXTURES ______ _ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE -~ ~- --- OTHER -__-_. _ ... _ OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE, U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH. o«h, comm. ear;-..-_- 3~~ $uppwh, Vmry FINAL MECH. feu/~<~u°~i-- K h, Shuralir OTHER__ ..____.___ _ ___ OTHER II (; IIINDFR FIR $O'I~ wm<., _ ... __. __I _ _. RO. PLMBG. war:;-ca:. w<~ri" _ 5°y0°ny fl°yh;°9s GAS TEST 1 FINAL PLMBG. v°r v°10' &r.. WATER HiR. '~<°: vd.u. ~, ____. Y.. 9e1 ` SEWER/PRIN. DISP._SYSTEM II OTHER OTHER GAS UTI IITV CLRNCE. BC'JDING ;rv l.GivDiiii GAe ^IPING +~~n. ,, n.~o- GAS TFSf HEAL P r neere°re, r I n..r ., fi rolr FMN, POOL E3 EC. P VJAL POO! PLMBG. SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM piHl~ _ I?JSPhrTION DA!F. INSP. SIGN F_- c~ L 0 V Y- C .r~.r (~ Q BUIF_DING AND SAFETY ~SION city of rancho Cucamonga on9n P..eel:eo annr6n r.rr~m„~a~. ca. 91730 • Tel. 17141 9891851 ~ BUILDING PERMIT .. e De . P w u ~ elp t npn ~ a L//L1 rw erPr- ~ f. . . e or, I N D. mad Ur•in !~u ed Repuepd L _ . -__,. -_ - ~+._i!~_._ Cc./va P ~ ,,, .; ~ eed.ppm, jute - ~ Mpillrg /~ Addrm ~ ~/:S ~ ~ ~ ~ /l F'~ AVPrwed APPrav.e AVVroved En9 On. Fva Dur__ Pfan Di~. 1--- __l . - _ ~, =r r... - ~ _ _ ,P.r,a~ ~G _.S-E1._ 5~~ ------ Ccndi.,.rr, -- --- --~ cpPnp r e c-o ~,~~ F__ ~~ --- - --- -- cC L~ ~/ O ~ ~pr ' (~ ~~ ~~ rel. S ~,.` -p L') _ vAWAnON 1 _ __.- _. __ stn- _ gar. t¢/ cD `` <'h ll._, No.__ _,_ _ 6 OoxrlL_' ~ O- ~ S~ 3 ~'l eIAN CNKr _ _ _ __ _ _. _ _ _ MaM1., EnOr, f PFANIi L ~ ~ y~ Jv Dor9nar _ - ~ - __ _ rel Addrev F~ pqq NAGF _ _ _ - ~ ~ - [r - - ~2ip S'ore Cr h oc ue SYSlE1A1 E ~ _ - ~~yy P;oPp,ed ~V;-yr/i- ~ LC't O_ ' S 9EAViii. - - - - -- -- /~ I P4NF ~.~~ - _ ~ // L WLi~1~/~• qty o/' /aC ~.C y I _ __ o O'rk. ~ ~ ~S /ING(.~~rr P a 1 ~. 5ai ` ... nm` TOTAL ~ ~7 I'.a ~ I 5. a to .r t o r ~ ._ r o.a eePp„ L^, D.m - N.. ' Aed _ 1, .~'S - ' ::3.+ L 1 rrn Pro r~ rR~rtoNO nNrl nn.n~,N .r ,..• b A u RxeN. rnvecxenvrr. I, rc;..aano.. n: aer~ ~ r 4e~nl i5r~ raA~Ylo n rH: '~r • mrtrn ~e n e \rr m ~ ~ r r v r n rm r ~M4 M'~ •r em mr~ rl.e 04\rr,7 nnn Prnlr~ron• ..I. nnn m ._. rr ..~Ylra;^• . _:;^rw~^•. ~. . .r r M ~ y • rn• • r ~~r Ou/.~~sZ " ,:~L[~~_i39o~ _ -- ~ - - - ... , _ rru NYWPI'lIP{',R PI.rr..R•rINV rr,, ' . Pn anmd m., r. ~•IiiM ^ ner nirn qr ~ v ne+M IarnMN Ins 1... me •.nr...trrr I+rm~ 1 AnrOr •rl~rm Jnr , •m rumor ': m. ,M r k-~rW r r„ry rPr4 i', r1Y r 4NTI '!'PTli lr~i v F.l~ r , P P I l rPFFft[ P flVR N ~ rnr !~:N i C ry ^e n. n r.n~ nr .nr r prrN rl Ir. r• /er L.re < .• i rWi ~ ~ ~'eM1 ~ ~f~r r~ rr '' f Fn- Irlelr u ~a y. M Srr ner u b r.rmmr nNr^r m u i ~ rr rNnr r.. n r .. r •^ r r n. ri.. uwn.re .r 1 ni e1 erll ..I.Iw r i4 ~ i ~4 r Mean ~1 ~ n r «.. ..u,.rn n. i _ ~+~m .p.nr. ....rti `~ P ~. ..IIN F. r I ' y ...-... r r r rwl M' LJ 1 M1r r~~ ~ . .. ~~1 ~~ ~ ~~ i n .e Nn nr r A ~ r nr 4 ry + nl wr ~ nNr ..m. .I(l~..c 1 rM1r '~. i~ r ~µ r.n.rrr. nM-.a ~ -- M1f • fnrr'.in1 'Mt.• : r° : ,.,...re ,. .r.r .A. r„r..,m..rr.•.. ..rr. 1 .,.ef, .m,.,n,.~.~ ^ ' ~.M1 ',~ e rr,fo ~ r;i rni~„°r •6rC~a~l" v ° .o. w ~: i Ga e a ~ r.. rn., ....,.~ r a- .-__. n O i .m ...mr ~.n. ~. .. rm en •n . -}J _ /} r ~.mKra v / / .._ __J. ~_.~_..1a. ri~~; .r r. Pr.4 IV1 J. Ll~ L ~ rFn u o bodd~eA n•rmri '.nee emPrr~r r a rpvee poa aono, ona rr mplkr ro of X14 ('r If'V PrP~~or~on ~1 war m.nu der n m o mnmea or n n endd o~ obonaoend ler iN ep,T. • MSPECTION RECORD • wuNDAnoN: lu. urhr. camp. Tmb, sMmm, Z, ( ~ INSPECTION NOTES iwm. IaiM. SMI, Evmnlivn. / .J ilGO[ SLAG/1515., GI[0.p5: Meth, Vap. Ierrm, ~~ ~- Yky., Spam, Anm, Vmb, Tr. Lmb. MASGN[Y: 6in1„ Mmbr lh., GroM lMa, CleamWh, Rdh. hoof vrtc: Nauire, Diapn. Rlaair:g, Ma1.r:al Grant Pnd Thicw m, Rad Drmna. _ 4 F G N l d - RAMIN : Wells, Rp ., akirg, vcing, ab., Neiliq, ticking, 0.aply Wdf Sbpa. INSUI/:TION. iM1vkneu, RAalue, pgirq, Swnd -- Cnullmg. • --_-- fI1CWML5: Me1niM. Th:akvm. Ovepera. Doxa. - ..~~-_.--- -_- tlpun, fmibk Oeb. __. ___. __-__. _. __ -__~ INIEIII01: IATNIDRY WAIL Ned:r:q, Suppmb, lap: leinl IeiM. -.. ._ - -_ .-. _-. - . ____ _ ___ ____. 0RE[IOR LATH/SIDING MmM1, Fonmms, lepy Ippr. Thrckneu, tickvp, ___ fINM INSPFCiION finnb Geed:ng Ced.l, Slvp ~ - ~._. _.,- iiem_ G:e:w :o--nPl. CcrL °m!aa °!: n..... Flro Dovn. f.ny leckme Dmm. IvM:vg•. /~~I ' n~ K/ / _ ___ _ Home Numbeh, Wearber S1r:pp:n4. PI ICngr. ~ _ Cleo I _ ______ ____ SWIMMIHt; rvuL/xw _ _ _ _ __._.._.._ EACAV. REINS SETBACKS Rodrvs 511., floM:rg,I _ _ _ - __ FrP Sal, RUmP Loc. Svrzhogv, SryY Idmrt. f { i t _ __ _ _ _ ____ - _.. _____. _.__ [EN<F'GAIES HenM, C,bao-s. Ac. er•,n".p ~ _._. latcnef, SmbJnr ( I I I I I 1 F'NAl INSf4RIGV Pool ' u. 1 , W LL 0 \J/ O V C ro ^Q` •<W~< V 6UILDING'AND SAFETY~SION city of rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cummon a, Ca. 91730 • Tel. p141 989 7 851 ~ BUILDING PERMIT wileirq /!d/E A}~y 6(.12c. dSeSty Ad6w Y /!,/PV No. ' Trc< ar. 9or^ <omr. Groep / t '"~~ !7 °I°`~ I" utNSte ro ~ ~ , . . toed u.~_n B<q.rr.a R.wir.a Owner ` Na. r 9rz AIN ~~•!!~1lQ LES PFlsr~ Q ._. .__. Bm•oomY 1s?e . ____ - aibn Add I ~~.~~x ~~` AG~oved AnPravM - APProvM Vlo^ Pv. Er Drv. ~ee Dlu. _ GM ZrP fel. /I Speool ~ ~~/ Addrm -- - . . __ Ciry Lp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ id. VAWAIION S Cry Slap lrc. 6 boor! l.c. No. -.- __ IIAN CNKN ._ .. _ _ _ _ Omgn<I _ __.. _ 4 Addrm iel F DRAR:AG: _ _.__. .. .- .. ~ E~.__ V slar. z~p on ~ -.I,t N. - - -_ - - n -.... __ vro o,.e g i c ~ <I .. eFAU v. c. a_ .__ _..._ I 1 _ - ~.. _ ~ IARA !I _ _ .. ~-~FI } 1 _ - ., - I ", ~., ~ ~ ~ om r _ A.n ;<par [ oe..m~ ^'~~ N<. Aw Lq I Y ' n .Y L¢msen IXVNTR XX nr'I AxcrRIN xNl.xa r~INrLNSAmm~ e^a n. I,. om.~ or.r , L .. N yLnn•fa 0p ulv^ rumlon ~^ l vM fl^n nl ~rnv v +v~ ~I ~f .„m,...r,. -.rt ,.. , .., r~rM ••or u..mr .c.. ~ m,. ~ I.rvr r...,•n ~' . . m l le ^ ^ nr r r rrn in x.. a Inl v I r~.., ,,.e, r _._...._.... _ fIN NFWeI!IIIrL0. I1Nf IANAiIVrN I i` v.. t __ mm^<^r ~vv ~• Ilrnl hnN,nl rwr i. M e,v Mr.M1 lurn~i.r l O ' M1' . I IrenEV Jl,rm Nu I .m e<rmnv Irnm vle fnnrrurer. I.rrnu I.• Arr to ©(e t Fr . d G F.,n , rr tx ]NI ml.. ~ r'W e An . .mn ~ rY . r . Y r ' p l Plr' IrIN YRIrM f •, . i, r... . . w v. nu r r a .Frr, n r d n •~ { , T ATf. l M T fl fgMfl~NXAiI/IY INiI.'0.1Nfr. mrr ' npg vp e n f.~ // r u••• n.. ...rr.m nr. nor M vn n r r /nr ev • dMk.r ~IIWr ^. m •r w x ~ . ,vtlW I-l 4 for v uvr n• nl p M1 M le µ nrv r r ~ I m ^ e Amnm. mlrnr r. rM r 1 a ,.rrr n.r In ..n,v n~^r..r .nr me.r vn. r.. ~.n .rd r.r~ rdr i• ~ r llm y N ~mven....,r ^//. •Y.nld , i.ri p r n AIm! p 1 T 2 +Jr.ve qu ..,ny.nrr e. 6unvrunn ^ .. o. _..r n. r.... r,y. _. .... .:.. ~. ... - .°. +... ..,... ..r, ,m .,,.,...r. ib. ,.v.o-m ~ v r,^°v .Ir 5•r rv n.. nru ,nil I..o•rn~n,,. r.pr y...r. r,..• r /n r~ r, _ . -_. _ f:NUIMr: A Nf1 r'rl NXTNfl/TInN I A n.. rdr I dwr .vr~ .n.Y A.n..rl ,.. "r u•~r~•rr .b n.iJ. n~ ~.,nr..... WnrA ,. n~mvr. n . nvn rm Nnrrn inrt.dr! rbr r..,. r . , >..I.rmnn.. I n.rrln allirm rAnr rAer. ~r ..n ^wwr..n r•^e i f N M1r „rlrr.l rv~ II, A~•"r,. r4 nvYdrne n. ,n...,r. ... r. ... .m ,.r..n.d .. n.. u,l . M I'Wr i ~n. .nrr l,.r .n eA Uir a~.mf Ir irrvM •r. „r.,r ,. „y ..n,. ^., n„. ^r r.sr.e.., rM1. ^...r r..dd.r .,u c... rM1. n..b. +I r +ava rnm v. <i ..r n.~u ..r r.,r.n<r v. r.< n.rv...r .Y. L.n.r. xvmr O U. m ^ R I.n.lr.. AM. - n^ r o rMY ~ ? m <r vM1r Im .n,ll. ~ ~ p H, rr , rY n ..m r r M r ~I f : n ~ ^.•.~ ..M nn „ ... ... .w r. 4 d / O rr ,in1r. y. ~ nir .n., rn r in nmm~ pw r c _~ nutur• nl A l Y_ 0.1r • • f !bl a bvddmq emm~ wn.. proeerly IJhd nvr, nq^.d ^^d .obdar.d, and , e.binl ra .Iry e.pvauan l wok IAnevnd<r q nnl mmm<nv.d or v rtwr~=ded or abondo,<d for IM doyv ,( • INSPECTION RECORD • FouR+DAnoN: fer. e=,ur. comp. r=,h, seroaa+, INSPECTION NOTES f>m+, Runl, b..l, E.m.eM1en. iloOR BUR/ISIS., GIRDERS: MerM1, Yop. Barrier, CI~ C ~x~ pkp., Spam, A«=n, Venh, ir, lmbr. L V , MABONRY~, Reinl„ Merryr 11+„ Groul kdh, Xf0/~+~ ~" Z ~~ ClwmOuN, Bolrv. tOOf SHiG Nedmg, DiepM1, Blakinq, Me4na1 Grade and ibr[4.ess. Raul Drome (' 2r-/_/K~~_~ FIRMING. Walp, RaN„ hM1.. Blxtmq, Broung, Neilirp, N<br9. Drapbr. Drolr Srap. INSULATION" i'•¢4rn•. R~VCIuo. Piping, Seund CaulRlaa~ ____,___ ____ FIRFWAtlS~ Malerml, iFrtkne+6 Dompn+, Dwn, Clown, Fuvble Lnty _ _ ,, ,_,__ _ fN1fRIOR" IATNI GR~ WALt NaJing, Bapperh, lap, Joinr Rmnl. ._. _ .......... _. F%PEPIOR IATHr51DING Mevh, rnpmen, lapr. Poper, iFrtknen, Behnq FINAL INSRECiION fimvF Uod~~q Ce~r~l, Pepe -._ _ __. _. . ._. ._ ..._ ._ of .Hw:c. [re;1 <c'q' Cc'd ocve+~ nlp I^mr {ne Daon, Eah, lxkmq Dever, ro~drngs, ~ ` _ l Oute Numberr, WealFlr $r~mp~^q, FI (Enpr file=r SWIMMING PODIj SPA I _ FXCAV R(Vlf. BfiBACKS Bodus 5'L,, Bandng _ - .. _ .._ _- _ _- Eap SoJ Fump for buaYag=, 5{v, idrnt ~ - + r _._ I FEND r.nrE• ,. .... r .., v ~~~ lnLFep nn M1~~ r I HNm. '^J~i' ~r of ,.~ r r MISCELLANEOUS ~sR:. ~ n ,. - i i i I__. __-j ~, '. - f __ ~i r _y_. _.. _.. ~ __ ___ _.... -__..-_. _. .. ._. ' •' R r~tDING AND SAFETY •SION • BUILDING city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 4340 Baseline, Rgndlo Cucamonga, Co. 91730 • Tel. (7141 9 lpl 1851 epndmo ~11 L ~ WR7DV 1h.W DIL. em^<I .__ _ .-~°-_._- - °'°"° _- Z Adduct - O« Nn Dw---- - D,< P<,m,l ~ D<,. F.v. n Blxk T<o<I I p< IT _ 1„a umN TR<ppr,.a_ _ P<wn<d_ Na, w~i _ I_- 1~~~ Na. lol Az< TAPN W pvner r~~.~~~.. &droam, ~Si:e _VT _ Ir I - ~C'W~'$'~lel/~g--Bf'T.QIIINr rITiY FpPrwe<}-' .P~:y `Pprcu<d ~. lF <PDt~ L Mailing ___ PIPn Dn Y.~lw W ~=^9 D'v r~.2-.C~ Add1'u So,<ial Ciry ~~- P DI Co"dmwz '- Cemucror 1 Addm, _ __ __-__ <.~ -3diNe'--- ZIp --fel uAtUNION f w ~in I_ \ smL 1~E-___. - -__. A<-Np. P.AN cnccE -_-.29Z..I~i- / a clp,,:l_-453&7~3. g-.. -9555 - 1 PeRMn -3 -OA~ Onip-r~'-oWn~' -' - lel FI DRAINAGE _ .._ Q nee.<., A CP.EDIT - Same - Zip Aou E SYSTEMS i _84J ~~ -' c. E h I _~L<. Hn - ~~ r,oooi:d. __ SI aPAdnl. ~ .___94 20- i cpn 5ttt .Bi.ui::-::~. - CREDIT ~/ '•• -- PAPY .fem. [cy'i - 'iz1E _ _ p. Li.vahle - L,728 S.f. I .,,p0. i-~ . _ Zit S_ ~I'S- Z ._ Garage -.44D S.F. - F.n ,,.a r <, pl Ir Pml Tofni~ - sv ~ v~ n~<d p ~. z .<PY IIs:p. rr 2 ~..., L ~J.. ~ ~ ,y.~,;:r~pe ~ Do <, , _ ~'k Vorch 33 5 P . r .,...I,p,'- ~ I ~ > ~ ~ 7r. l x'n^AEPA IrNPF49AT141YCIlA0. nl~~~ N<. eea '_ "' 1 R / I,ox, ,.... m. ;:m~m,,,r .d,~d .w. ,.,7rM ..1 . L fENBRU R' F (~~ ;' t rr ^ A , •rrr^r• u ^,mn r t 1 , r5r. F IAr "~~-n-.AN.•1.-7"'1°u:°A..9... .. F„h M.."f "" "Kffi^ ~ ~ I I~.~. Ir M tual- ~Ii1<U..1`•: "NII Mir .nd nw<e lei m7nnF O ;„b nA F,iM IsN /\ ~N,r P t`I I.IrF.0. IrFl I.,NATNrN \vL ~~ ~ ~Id •f/irm ur•1 INm Iran nnvv ^ 1 e~.,.weYr e r lCr/,M "^f:^T,f ICAiIIX FR ENVTIIIN iPOY O r. M If.elrrne.r f Aon rr I/ ^j v. ran • PS P~MMNATII^N INA;RNNf F, r wA.rtr N rM rr~//n wYA" rPI,W rP nrnrNlra ^I r<Ie,mrMl'I.rlrw Egle^en A.~r a III W, V I.+o.r nn ,er .^•~I r, •, ~ ~Pffle(~u YI r11//nrol 6e• i~'A°• v rAr ,i ~ '..-. ..Alrrr PerAN• `~+Mw , w'„r .Anlr Or r I /n.I Ie s ...., n~-i~IV n m __ _ ".ur r.nAV ~tA mw Nr nr n. _ r^N ••~w .. ~.. ~...I..un e, tl.r I -,Ir mm -,rA v.se u r ,1.. r ~ I. w ,,.r., .. u, nr.,. ~,.. ......,..n.n e, ml.,„ ... I __ ._ n livNl to Ar.,Nelvrr.rl ~.r iA. w..rL lo. A Ui,~.~m,i, „ .ruN ~"i6x eimr [. r'N.I C nnvv I,eI ~I"4<.'i nre<en Inn nrr h• Ie. In p.r n!I ,rN^M rM e.n.n Ilin.lr., A~Mrr ,Ae Inrwe ~ ._..r , w, ^, ." I,. I,.r,.-,,,.... ~L. I ~~ ~,'e'i. r,,.I ~:~ X`: "ra ~`^," " re:°m.o. """1`7`.~A-"" n O I . ,.,.. ~. I•P . R ... A., ,.,.,r- -- AI<nvver,d .nnl, a n.4 'Q II,r, _ _ _ _ __ (1 n,.~{fyjj-5~1p{pps"4f~«"~~O 1 Ir. Aure )lo- iFn n LmId r10 p•Imll wAen Polo<r1Y IAle.doe l., n9n<d nded opl~obondon<d lal IaJ d yb vpvabon rl worl IFp<ordai r mmmrn< r n rwp< o I rl:'Py • INSPECTION RECORD • ~ '• ' AOVNDAiION IGr. Cerhl. Ca^0 inh, SeModa, ',~ ( ~~ ; INSPECTION NOTES iann, Ieml. Steel, 6mwliw ~~ / ' i iIOOR SUE/liTS.. GI90EP5. MmF. Vnp. Mnoeq EIYp., Spvm, Aaeu, Vann, ir. Lmbr. 1-Y~7 - MASONRY. Runt., Mabr 10., Grom CJn, CIw.~Ovh. Eelb, -- -- ECOF SHiG Nml~np, DiapF Blabny,~ Morenol ~ ' ~, - __ _- Grode and iM1i4nav, Awl Drew} r /` f[AMINU Wolly. Aolr. Jan, plx4lnP, Ere:m9 C ~ S ' '~ ' Npdinp, Bahma, D~apRr Dralr 9opv , i) - , ) C r _ N v"kn<n, AAalva, Pip:nP, Sound IN m y y_ / ~/ CouIL B ~/'/ ~) r 7 ~ r ___ _ _._... ._.._.. FIIEWALLS Moraial, iba4nav pamper. Dw n. Clmnv. fm.nle LnLV. ..._.._ _ ..._. .._ ._ . INTFRIOA~ LAiH!DRV WALL NoiLeg, Svpporh, ' fRT OR LAW `9, DII:G MerF vmrereo, Loov. A /y F ^ voar. d~rP -_- ,u r/ _ arF (,'rcd~np Crud, Sane FlNAL IvSPEC*1 N f G ., . . ~~ r ice Doa Er ~ lod aid 9 r ~PI s w pr~ A ~y~ ~ .~ - -- _..._ umber rn, r 5e Dore rn^r p .t rt^ / 1 U <m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ SWIMMING POO L/SPA ~: .. ` E(CAV F[~NF. YAPA'.KS Rcrl:w Srl. Ppndmg.l ~ _ _ _ by So I Ramv v 'one. M1~' Herr I _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ____._ __ _ _ ___ _ Ffrrr-_ _,. _. ~ ~. ., - r ._ ~_.... - .. L~~. r, . nr ~ HNa IP. d+ ..~ ,~ ~~ '~ MISCEILANEOUi _... ~ ~___y__ .__ _1_ W O `W Z L O V Q C a m BUILDING AND SAFETY•ISION city of rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline, Roncho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 • ?nl, 1714) 989-1951 ~ BUILDING PERMIT 7'j `7 % ~~ O O ~ 6 Na. '~ iYPe a.. . -~----~- Swm C GrouR 1 -- Lol BIxR bait Ne. _ _ _ O« ~- No Dw ---- Ilv Permit Dn. Re.. food p M1 gegon<d ~ fAe d yart_ Owner / /~/R ~ _ Nw ~a~ APN Morl'rn0 f p ~ ~ y ,J AaAw J ~ ~' `~ L•.0.: Iy/ `~_ APPrmN d'~- / gpprpvttl Plan Dr . Orv ~ , i f/ 1: I fne Dnl. ___ Ciry , ~ L tel, ' a ~O L! 7/f~'`7GA.'~G~ _ spH.al co..e,NO.r~' .(~ ~~/~Lsh ~ '77~¢ GJ Canna<ror . _ __ ti ..ra / .1~...-.. -~___ Aear«, . ._~_~L-.~- . _--. T Ciry zrp r`I' ____l -_ _ _- - -_-__ vnwnnGN S Q iti ¢OG °D r Slate La Gry b ClaurL Lc No. PLAN CHE<K ~ DniNnl r~i._I .C I_IC '.~. lr-L_ V_Y_ I RERkn ..._._._ ___ / ~ rd Ae~X_z i 7 L / F o;e~Nnr.t G Cd ~slar< ~ z -r ~ .-... _ _ ' E I ~ .q r ~ C ~a L: o ~ _ . E SPFMS : { 4 _ _ . Progor I r / _ ~~ -%._ ~.~ _ S. aAnrr I I ~ir1~.rr ~..a r y / ~'F~'~~•2 Y~'~ C C VARK } ~-MfvaGk~I IIn G.fL/c f ~j 2 ~ .SU - ~ ~ - - - o o ~. P;. ~.. c<,r s,a rrr, ea 5rti.>.gi rrc Pml TOTAL 9. • r ~ I ~, I ~ .., r Eu. Lz°L.l _ . . n { r~ ~ ' r New Aea r i:r ,i ~ 1 A'' , ~ _ D ' e I E~a '{rJ ! : ~. ~ . r 1 :/ f: P . , , .mo o ~ .Pa~ _ ~ l .a r,l I.rCPNPER Vrrrt0.PrTnN.V i Mr l MI J r 1 I I x ~ r x /'r1NPt NSATIrIN 'I.ntl.lTlrrX I ~xN ex9 !!irm r .r ~ O e + 'w rr r nrvri n.l frnlwlnnr r.A. •n.l mr N Pxaren el P.+Lrnn 1 tM Bunn.v r ~.m~^^n.inn Inrvrnn.r nr • ~IN nr rMrnl r.Sr• ]rrW. `J n r m.. in alr lam +nA rffM n.i. r Mr i I r~vn ` rx'Mf.0.Plrl RRf 1,AXeTlrlrr mr Nr. I X J f i •X r. IfM M1N rvpr O ~ 1~'Kr .nv O 1nr•4r f+rniNN m .e ..nrrw ~( b ~ m iP r rP~nl.•n n. rfm • r f r k I ^ q ~ n rv~ . X ~ r F ` µ Aif rl i:SfXPTI IN fN)X rNfxNV'1 rrN N VR F f le .nrY ~ +rrp ' a l~Y t 1 J . Y ` r r i t. r..rr.. .r. ...r r. ren re.di /. .M.rir lWa i11M ra . ?nr I r.i i n rn M...mr a r.^r r. rlv M. n.r r.. • nrf f •r.rr ~ n..r ..... rr. .i.r n•. A.rJ dM•rr i .nni m r/ ? I ./r 1 IPP r•Mrno A .rilrenrr el A'r.nvrnn M. J...M NV+ I \ ~ n w p v = it IM ~~ _ _ ~.vr nrrrx rr• rn - rvr rrr nr orr.n .rwnn r 4v. ri~Nr Mrr 'rnM~ oei n/r 111N^T PrrR PN I.FNINNfi Pq RNfY r W o%Inmwn.. I '^ O ~ + ~ ~ rl rKr .nr4 .nr~X UK r aemir .• rwM. r.. ry ~ry •i m n rbr ~r i~ .nr n•.rr m ....fmn rn. rl.r m n... ^I ^ i r.r n+..ln I.nA.. • A. m. _ _ ____ wK f or, r n.r~ n ..i~rrn^Nr..i u r~u rX .nlM1nlnl i. r. re r. rural r. Yr rnnrwlwr /irrnw /n r ~ wr AplaTr~.r. ~w _ ^ r• in np ~w o+r.mn Iir.rV+n _ r ~ R •nr I _ = - X Iin P ` .~~ ' ~ V'1 ~~ ~~ Rr ~•rr Iho y v buadrnp PYT~~ w5pn properly Idled out, nq^ea '^d •al~daletl and n m61M1 la r ~, ny eqr Gabon I wool re.reu<tler n nd mm..nr.tl ar n mlP•ndvJ or oLTndorod for I!0 dap. - - ~ _ • INSPECTION RECORD • FouNO/,noN: wr. c.HU ca^p. mM1.. (~,SS,% INSPECTION NOTES ` Fv.n, 6inl. SM<I, 6Mwxm. _ FIODt SW/15tt.. GIIDE6: Mmh, Vop. ~ MLy., spp^.. A«nt, v.ph, rr. Emb (I-3 ~' o- MASONIR t.in{., Mabr lh., Grwl lilh, Z Q~ lvs LlevrvOuh, Bolh. ROOF SHIU NoBlvg, DICOM1 BlaHng, Mebrbl v~P ' v ~-Ct( / ~B N Grnde and ihihnn~ Aml Dral +, /$ '~+ / 01 4in n RAMING W lh R l• Lh L~-aL ~ i ~~ n ~w ~~ ~'~a g, ., . a . u .. a g. mp [ Nvili^g, Bahi^B, DivDFI. Drub SroDt. .3p.Bf ! INSULATION: iFi<l~err, A~VOIUn, Dip:ng. Sur^d • Cvul4ing, ~~_ il[EWALLS~ MaNiial, ibNnm Dompen, Dmu, /-al •~ aete ,Frank n^b. INifRIOt tATHIDRY WAIb Noilmg. SrOWrh ~ .3~&~~[t~~ "°~-~~~~ lvq, Jolnl tnnl. - ElfifllOl LALH15101NG Meth. PoOenen. LapL .!-j, /~ QQ ~(~4^'< Paper, Th:hnett Ba<bng ,_ 1' -`_ s~ppyy~] - L ~fl T 3 hA e k fINAI INipfCTION FinirA Grading Lend dope ~J _2_ tOT/trj ! r l'uE M(/'.~L: _ ~~- ~ , Pb,l. E^,.,, c:_:~ c,~e =t.,.d , ..e.. k, ,e. F D f n i r ~~ . Z./o.~ i / S/~ e>= ' ~r!s~LGLi~~!~C/ .<.:<n. :m m... r~ ,< ng . . ^gt Naute Nunpe~t, Wea~Fer 5 ivu FI ifn CIM a Fem.// ~ /~//Lj~ '~• ( ~ _ ~ _ - ~ ___ .. --~- ~~~ ~~~~--6a,.v.~ ~ LI~~G5~5 - -. /I --r-. -r ncrv7. r-x-(~ GYVUL/!VA Ll__1_'-~1_ - u~t~"-L3`c_~_LL'LPw v~~~ EXCAV DE Np EBBACKS~podius i B^rd:rg, / - ._ i ~( ,JC ScC .~}r7~-~~<"~ .______ .-_ __.__..._. _.._-.- < ' `^ Fa San mt. P 9 _ _ ' _ ^ o„ __ °r.-.: ..... _ ._ flNpl ~Jlnl i Imp 'arn ~ ~ _._ . MISCELLANEOUS I _ _ I ipff' l} ',' ~~ I ~ I 1 t) • BUILDING AND SAFEN ION • BUILDING city of rancho Cucamon ga PERMIT 9 320 Baseline, Roncho Cummongq Ca. 91730 • Tel. p141 9 891851 rrve a<' Np. i ~ wilems Ia~Atc m~ vfa~i t srq.i_ - p - - ~ Z bm.f. --- l A!aE rroa l - p ----- ~--- oK. No o. we Frmn ~ oK. ta. Required rR r<d e ~__ _____- __ Ne. I __ e9~r load unnf _ r _- _ _ _ _ _ _ I /pN A W - __ Ome lol w L Na, Hpprwed f.pprovM TAPP•wed .G Mailing .~,.~1 O,, Iw' \~ Q(h-A~ a•c~(h'E bdr - -- Elre nm. _Plnn o~, .. Ln9 or.. 1 _ __ ns ~~b,.~,A-- ,,~~ II~~.'.- Srp rel. sPmgl _.._..._ -__-__.- ~ cp~ne<rs,bWPo-KF. tn~l _1~2oCF~oN Low INYn _ ~,~~ -'~ ~- v ~ `~ y bd.n'IE~71 .a~, IAN YtR fWl Q ~ W - - r~ Crv IA ~AE~ _, _L~E 1/3L _ ~ 5~'u•'_J- _ vnlunrloN 1 IQ / h'LBr ~' _ Ci993lo a-Ib 2 ~.~i ic G hNq. oob40S PILN CHECK ...- ) __ _ J - . m r1 ~ S _ _ rrer oel p Admen ____ rel, F~ oAAwneE - .. __- _ - Q .. - _ uN ~,~q 6e 1e I E ;rsrME _- l~r nq ._ _ 1 __~~11 ' ~~ d p g SI AFA~'IF. I ..- _ _ . _. _I ' lron -y<ai(A'LY WwA-(1~/ + r u Co ^ ~ ~ A ~r Q'lt~l~~ !r'~K~il'I oAAK _ _ __. T. _ - _ DIMEA L __ _ _ Z .. w.qo!'... amr P.o, r~, {ly OTA , ~ ~~ ~ , • rj J T ~ v r ,, ~ . sn. N ~ ~ , I ~y ~ I ` ~ ~ ~"'+ e ~ r I l ~a1 ~' = . irm _ qn I -~3_~ i x'lg Per r J New ~ Add. l_ Are ~ i.P'1'r r J<^ r IIAT:.IN gl uRRI~ r11NTRA1Tt18'H X ~ K ~r nHxxRi r'pNPf:HBATrp 0.A~IN Orn "r "r "rulr.• an! nma ae I. n r •II'm rmmn l 1lOp ~ r e' m . ~ ^e nr ,.•nrer un l Inra.l.v •:r'T rA~~ ein~ •n nl. n"d mr ~rwlo". ~ r • nN Rr r ^ o r Nr.n . xnrr (' Inrer•n r u/ e1~ r r • ~ Im .G I Ilrr w I. rn (P ~4„ II ~XVI~ f < i N[R~ ~~ ~ ~r ~ u r. N ~ ~ r N y iNM /\ J~ e b ~ 1 ~''1 r ~i~~ ~ h ~ f'M1ON S MPTIrIH Tl yrf N I O n u I bv . l.J (N `• •e ~' jn +a Y fil rN w"r n811PA MPI'ti~AlIrIN I .rrRANIf~.R IIOa. angrrN r r r v Ir. enr •NrN JnWrr i .n . r n ^". I. l rr. . • ~r ..r . . i , •r m V ~ l • mm Y r ,1 n irrFr ii. ••M r ,~~N~nnr to a n• v.rilr " rr nr r r ,n iWr• mNN/ .r,l n ell bs /. P1.1 uN I nl ` W ~ • ~ A /~ r m m ~ r .b4 A r • `rrnN kti ~rXir ... ..~nra •n O ( 1 _ ~ rnil1 ale rb. ~ A. ~•I INFNOINI. A rNBrPVIrION '4•' .. " m ' rrl!..Nxro K . !"wr tAr vr.lvrmmm IJ n. .mlr r ...... -n n.. fmT v rv f .., rr,r . ."r r.~„ ,. rm:... , ,, ~ E ~M'.:t:°; , •~;,..IMr:a, .'- O L..,... Ar,lr -- -- - - - ---- I ..ra. ~ U • } "" + rA a .n.rmrurir, Yd' r r• I R r . ; r ; M~ nX~Alr ' ` i .n.. Inv i ~...t r.i ..r.r r., r...,."r.r rn +r l , nr ~~~ A I'r r..r rA.. i.n ice..- H r rm ..rnr.r ~In Rr ,4 __ O r .i•n•rurr xolln~nt~~ ) ~ ---~- - -~~ - ~ -------~ - '' ' N.rl,.. A,A...-4zz}e-_ b Rom ~ rArl a build.•q oumrl wAe/r qop<Ny Irllad P I~pned Ond .plydnl.d, 6n'1 II IublKr Ip s.pb armx d nod IArvnunJ.r a rel mmmr ..d or a .mendetl m ubondoned br t~ deq. . ref 1Oli Cr~t"( r' e i • MSPECTWN RECORD . 1O°"D""ONi!"'`^"I `°"°''"''s""°`''' INSPECTION NOTES aocR swims., cIRDNS: waA, vw. Rw.ia. Rip., Spm., Aam, Vans, T,, lmb, AEAWNlY: 4m1.. Aber lh., Gan :pv, ORmWn, RWR [OOF $MG: Noilnq, D~opb. BluRbq, Abrar~oi GpdR pM ThicMrv, Roof pains. pRAAIIHG: Wa1H, R^IV, hh.. Rladi:p. Rmdy, Neili:q, bAir:g, oiopbt, omh Srops. INNRATION: Tbvknm, FVaWa, Rpn,p. Swnd CoAip. -- -~-- FIREWAIIg: Ablaial, iTidnas. Dnmpen. Dmrr. fmible ^nb. Cb.... -~- , INTFRIOR: UMiDrv WAkI: Na~linp, Svppan, laq, binr Rant. -- -._-_-_........_._, ._--. EIIIERIOR LATH/SON0. MesA, imlmen, Lops. iopr. ThKknev, iockl:q. qq ) ^~ ~ iINAI INSiECiION F:nivA GroE:ng C<:1:1., Slppe ~rt 9C C '- ~/ ~,- , rr F!~ _ __ __ _____._ ifanl Ene:yT Ce:nVi Cord io, ed, a kre, r ,S /~ Fre Donn, F+m, l:+bny od¢a. lond::gv. `7 c' ..J .... ..___.___- Nauva Nrmben, WealA<r Slripp:ny, PI Ifngr Clmr. SWIMMING POO L!SPA ((( EXGV. REINF EEiBACXS~ Rodms 9l,. Bmding• I I _ ~ E+p So-l. Rpnp ta. S~r<nage, Spn :dmr 1 -- --- ---- _ _ _ -_ - - .._-__ ____. __.. ___._._.__ ... ........ ........- - 1 iENCE/GARS No^M, Cl..;o. Annul nr. ~ _ ~ - -~ mlron„,r„mey { i ~ . PNAI IN4YCiIJN Pwl C.~ .: I~ MISCELLANEOUS I i RI .:, ...I ~ ~ -- I i _ .,.: j ,. I n. ~ :. 'r". •. .I BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ ELEC./ME(H./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga 63 PERMIT 9320 Baselire, Rancho Cucamo~9a. Ca. 91730 • Tel. (714) 989-18 De¢eP on fAddd No ____ m_Cemmeruol, InJrrb_ap _ . - _ _._ li earmmg 0 6 3Q7 AEdross s.r.,as ~ Z Lol OIOCM tract - - a W _ _ _ ' -- -- W No epm<lel Lgmc _~e Swi¢M1esl ._ i ~ Mailm9 ~ N ~MOlonl ~ ~~ -~ Ap~ress Oodo IHY .a - _ _ ~ ~ L I~ ~,o Tel y . s F ~ . ~ O~Ber - I ~4 '7 ~ ISOeuly _ O Lonaaelor ~ °( Sq. 0 Areo New _- AOaress ~ A ~ F' Nesdmeol Bidg, lJ - _.._ J 4W ya h A,.a rv.. ~ 2~0 Tel ~ ~ 9m Auevery BId5 L1J Llly . ~ Plon Ch. .fee I I ruc.a $lal8 LIC L'ly I" N0 tee - -~ LECTRICAL FEES 6 aassn TO TAL E W urrxanr mxrxernrna ncn.aanr,x I~~ ~ .o-. ` I ve o~rr~~pre ^ f.<_ ve I o<m,~pl.,,, ___- r Cem l 11 M.n : m I(r^a, rt~ .~...n .......n v..M1~..... rm....n m. ~ ri o r . rq~ .. } ~. id W wV i i ~. Boier~ 4 o 6 '. Ivtl, Q • r . . I W OM BIU o I nx Nr0.a1111.r, 1'.P I~ri I..B~TIiiN N '~fAU c ~~ BcAe <omp lS xV er 9 HY r " ^ li.... o. m. ,n. } MOW BTJ I I \ ._. Inm. rnu i w .r.mv. Imm M u.mr.nnn ~ ~ P. WWII °usn Ai onMe o 6 ~~ r••- J u ~.. ~ I •• e,.. ..n ~n r . . ~~ "n n• •, ...u.n. ....nn•u"r -.m PO V , f;, Air Irondler , IgoBO dm ~ n m Z ~~r .m...mri ~.~i.,w nal r. s. .... ~ ~rlf"ova ~~~ V j ,..,.. ___. -_-.- _ -'-_ r.~.--- w TOT f AI MECI~IANICAL FEES _ .n ...H„ „" „~ ~.,+ „~ - '.. ," W j/%f ~ ~~ fy:Gx~~-- u~i ~2 ~ ~ ~ ~ I~L { ~Ir ~~ .I ~ s.w O ~ .. 4 ~, ,..m v .~, . P z ~e" ~ _ . ~ , ,~ , , V .. ,o .., ~ ~ PI ^. ., / ~ ` ~ ~.~, , .,, .. w r. .....,, ... ~, dl C FEES MBIN s TOTAL PLU N "..". .I r .,, .,."......I .. . E ' " ' "r'" ~"' ::° "d ~ ~ TOTAL ELEC MECH., °LMBG. FEES /l~l,~ ~ ` ' . . ~ 4P. ~ ~, 1~.y rr ;j :d ... a ~ Y / ~ ~~ ~ ~ .~~. ,,,, ~ o~or.,r.n ;Y,~ '5,.. . I a __ .1T vn... r I.1... _. -- ~'- W ~ By FL^ f.~mi 1 ' ' ~ I Ilnle ~'VO~~dnrian ~ 77 ~ ,. . -- --- - --------- - , .~ i~07 ~:0 r O X .rB"~ ,Iml.,,. .B~e 9.99'X, ox.d ~~. .... o"d .el~e~~oa a"d .. d r~ r ,M1„ L° :' wm I ~ ,vr nbeoden.d I:u IBJ d c," ~^~md o ,r , ynd I I b ~ I ".•.,•nnr . <.u ,. eo wa . ,PEA" JR GOPV UNDERGROUND CONDUIT NEW SERVICE FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP, PCWER POLE OTHER OTHER ELEC. UTILITY NCF. U. G. DUC REFRIG. LINES oven, cemn. ur, H RO . . _s~owlo, Y.m! ____ _ _ __ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FAU/AC U.b FINAL MECH ' . vrs,ln sn.roxl ~ ~ OTHER .__. _____.__- ..___-.. I _._._. _t -__'._ ___ I .._. ... _. -._ ___. ..-.. ... ~ " _ _- -_ OTHER I . _. _. _ _-. _. _-__. .._- ..__ -- soil. wma. U.G./UNDER FIR. ,,, ~ __ RO. PLMBG. mR¢on:, wom.~R: ~-Sb'~f L .• __ ! ~L'I ~ _ _ S',/ SEVJERIPRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM • GAS TEST ~ fINAt PLMBG. r"~°"'' v'i°`~' __ _ sa a+ _ ~ ! r ~ / ~L'~2`~i ~v~^i vow,,, WATER HTR ttt . _ __ ,._ I. Rd voh. _ SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM ..-. ~ I 4 I OTPIER OTHER I GAS UTILITY (1RNCE snu Diner. I 1 1 I_ _. !_t_:NI_l l_II! I I GAS PIPING roa,•~~~~ =>o'n GAS TEST I i ~ ~ ^ i HEP~I ~, ^' ciemnm~ ~ •, Stim dl ~ FITI ~; POOL EI PC. ' 1 o-iNAl POOL PLMBn i U'F9 n ~INSPEC TION DATF. INSP. SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFELY D~ION ~ ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga __ PERMIT 932C 9aseLn=, Rancno Cucamonga. Ca, 91730 • Tel 171 41 989-1 863 awlCrng /ODd/ Ne De+<rpr.on (Rdd~LOnv. Commerool Inpw vy _ AOOre ` / [O ~ $er ~ r ~o( eiaw nacr _ ' Ina~ey ._ . ( ._ _ No ~ ~ Ounerr p W I&mebJet ugMr, S.rnoFetl r Marlrn9 ~ ~ me, r aoeress Jn j molo~r crr, ~D ypJO iei ~' i~7A~i ~ 'Inv eo C ~ ~pvadv _ _ ~ _ ~ Sa. vr. Ano New A Tess B~' 8n~denaei BItlB. (n.. ~•1 SQ F M<o Nex GrIR ILO lips J Jer K<esrorv B~dO C' _ ~~a,~~r 360 ~s"c~ I ~~~ Ne ^ r LIRRNFf.II MYTRGR~a F R1.r'1. rrR 1 ^, ^ rMr 1 .mp pmrotr lrm. rM <N..rT.nnr. I^.. n.r 1.. r~~r u. I.er.nr .rrrrm nw~. /l I u ...,...d '.n. nr..n.n..r. m..rrrni^.....un ~ ...... .. ..... ~l M N., h ^,~,... ... ~ ~.,~ rn r^ ..., ,.^~ ~. __ ~ m,„ i : ~) : ~ , rr. .. ...., , " 4. ... „ .. .. W vIw P~ I I _ r.o m r.. ce< i TOTAL ELECT RICAI FEES No orr Oerv~or ,m ~emnpnnn Re ^ p.u m R ro r r L ~ Badn dompr W ~ 1/) veU o... ' Bod.~ coma 1` ISO WO B'V u.m BnY rc IS HJ N f'r Wnli $utP ~ Pr Ma"d'.r r~ G U n rr d A .. _ W ~ ~ TOTAL M6CHAHiCA1 FEET ~i p e e ~ Je^ e ~rt 1 ~ •• e r ~ ~+r~.. .. ~ ~ y ~• r er B s ~ .. ~ ~~ ~I ,< ~I~ , , . ~ ~ l ^~ ~ : ^ ~ ' ~~ /~~ ~ ' s 1orAL PwMelrvc F f Q ~ .'r,~ TOTAL ELEC., MECH., ~'.MBG. FEES--_ I~-~Z~~ r. • ., _ .. _~___._.___» By 4 ..! Pe'^n vadaoxon / Unl iAit oler ~~ml/mnrM1a. ml~pnrmb . t~~l w6rn prop=rIY Idled a spned and raVdal.d, cnd rublKl Rlo ~r P'.~rr o^ 'I ..oil r < ~~„I r..r .r rc .~ nn.ed <,r r ~dod + ebandvner Ins iBJ ~fn, r, f ~ECiM NOTES ~. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT NEW SERVICE FI%TURES _ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POIE OTHER '. ' -- _-.____.- OTHER .._.__. _.. __ _.---____ ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE, U. G. DUCi51 REFRIG. LINES ou<n, can. w.., RO. MECH -' . suvvan, v..n veu/ec uon FINAL MECH I . Y r,. snvM6 OTHER OTHER ___- _- ____- UG /l1NDFR FIR _ I r- I . ._.. .______ w;,r6; c°:, v.,r, ~ RO PLMBG . . SVyR~rr,. f!oSFmgr ' G_AS TEST ~' I ~ SEWERI PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM FINAI PLMBG '"r""'' v°~""' ~ . &ra<m ~ n ~, WATER HTR. p` a i ~~;~ _ !(('( ~''";. + f r~ ~;r_ ~ ,:d.. ~ ~ SEWfR1PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM i /~ KE e ` I ~/ ~ ° ~ J OTHER I OTHER I GAS UTILITY C~RNCE. nG~~;ouaG I i r ~ ,.: ~D~ '! o GAS nIPiNG ~~. ~~~ ~ ~ ,tr' TEST HFl. v ...~ ~'Ir i I IIgAI ~'r)O~ VI MBL i t 4;, P '115F1 '!.ON DAIF I IPi5P. 57GN, • BUILDING AND SAFETY D•ION ~ ELEC./MECN./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT ?..,, e32u oeseline, Flancho Cecamorya, Ga. O' ?30 • ^' r?! 1; oao_! aF3 Brulam9 ~ .j,, i - ~ /~ Ne Onn~pLnn IAaarnorr_4_<cmmeraol. Ir,dwrrmp_ f _ __-_ ` `raCr l01 BIOCk en f 115'[ ~ I o~n<r, ~ ~ ,~~_ W O W - ' IReapmaa li3e•v. Swil<Fes _ / // arl n9 ~ ~~ Aaeress /. ~ } in f.. me _ _ ' mcm. r _._. /I ' Tvy % . Glv LOI - k J P I .IIP e _ .__.._ I orov _ _. /' ~ O , Lonlracla - ~ V ISp<orr _ _ _ 1 ~ ~- / ,~ / (( SR Fl bw M1ew AJdresz, .. . ~ ~ I ~ Am~dmeol Bltlo _~ _ _ ._L _ ! SP Vr bec Mew Zro co r Bldo (a' R A r W y W v ,r nusn Plun [x Y _ r Stale Lr< I l r ~ . wnnc< Fee f« - _ _ Nn ; ~ I m 6 ClasSr~ TRICAI FEES ~'~ nMl nNAlllrN P TOTAL ELF.C ~ W 41GeNflLIr fnvlPfl(Tp P ^ !Jc Cer[~~pl,On No I Cer rrPl~an fw Q r rM.r.r... ..r •..V r ritln.r.,.~ .m um.~w. v..n .r..r m. ~ ' FPb •0 8 i n it Bv+,le Lemie .~~ BN< I rc 6 m<lue l nP '. ~ I l r rlx ui'0.91rI1Sf.P 'err IwN.1i1rIV I¢"Com or Bw fA0 cv r < ~ ^,r ..., nnrrn. root r •m ....rn.r Ir.m m, n.nr,.rrn,....... L. n..n. r i < 6'I' r t HP IS HP IC1,1W t O .. ~ J .v. rP i I tl 0'WO dm ,~ n .. U 9oa . I der I ., .. ...... .. n, r r I o • 1,906 dm ,.Poet cod Z . ~ n A r i ...n. _.,.. r O r Z hr. 10'"n a .. .e. n.mr V :uc..e I li n._-- .__ ~_~ _-_--. __ _ .. ~- ~ TOTAL ~`d'e~"H ANICAL FEES r ,< ee.,, n'e I v<• vl (, ... ~...., N P. s w A D c e. v«.. ~ V ow x . ma .. n..e.r r.. .. Z c. sr.re ., ~ ~ , • j >•P r. ~, ~ I 1 p„ ". .. P a,,. .. .,..,.'..a . ' . ~ ~ ,.r.,. . :... . .. .. ......... a I IOIAI i'1 L'MOING FEES ~.~ ~ .,r ti..,... .,.. ;rn,c^.V,., m:,.::'..r._ ,r,...r ., .. ' . '~', ;: LMBG. FEES MECH TOTAL ELEC ,,_ ., .,,.r.„~ . r..._.. ; ., . .. ,.. - -- P. o.. ~ A, 4.' I ~. ,. ... ----------- ,le , nrrr . r.. ..n r - .y : . ~ .e.< .,p ,ed ~ ' ~„a ..~ dared ~ ~ reme• m e, ~ r trot. .v rora.,d. ~ ~~..,. < .m. .a .r o.,en rcr '~ er CONWI7 NEW SERVICE FlMURES _ _ ______ FINAL ELK. INSP. • / ~ S '~ //~• !/J='~~`Y(U~' CF c'!~i 4_ -__. _._____.__ /. .... __~_..... .__J.. .._..... ... ___._.F. _.._._. _.._..... _ ___- F' TEMP. POWER POLE ~'~ .~ ='~__~~~ _ _~ .. OTHER OTHER EIK. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES Ro. MKH. w<,.. conln. u:. _.__ --__ -.- _ - - Lppah, Vmn .. . ___ _ ... -_. __. _ _ __- FAU/AC Unx FINAL MKH. YR„h snmoxl I __ _...-_ OTHER _ __..___._.. OTHER _ __ ... ..__. _._. ,-___.___ __ 11 I' II IAII~[II Cl fl bil, Wele~. I I _ _ . _ __ _ ~L s~~oo,x _ i __ ~ - ------ - -- RO. PLMBG. wal<q coy. v<m~, ~. . 5rvw~n, ea,n~~y, --~ --- ...--'~--- - -- ~-i _ . GAS TEST ~ ~ SEWER; PRIV, DISP, SYSTEM DIAGRAM FINAL PLMBG. nwm~<~. vol.<~, j _. .. __ x,.~a i ~ WATER HTR. v<m, v<wn, I - _ •ss. Rd Volve SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM f OTHER _ _ I OTHER _ I I BONDING I U.G. CONOUR GAS PIPINf.. Mmm~oF o~~m GAS TEST i„ ~~a, ~,nm~<u FINAL POOL ELEC. ` FINAI POOL PLMBG. /1TIItR INSPFf.TION DFTf I INSP. SIGN, BUILDING AND SAFETY D~ city of rancho No dle Lac ~. C'!s f'n/ r' Y% Y old: H"8~~ SS 1•: 'I." O 1 ,'If FMfiip r'nuTeelTnP[ PFAI.~ ~f'MO rr ~ r.n ... ^, .., .'~ , . r ,..~.. , m. O .. .,..... . r .~ n. „ .n M,. O i .m .van ,.n.. v.. u x ~ n. ...,. ELEC./MECN./PLMBG. PERMIT I<o Dmv Cron l^e__.n Tan _ ..... p_- I J a ~ O~ner V iSPeciy _ I - ' Sa. fr bm new n H 8ndeni~ol Blde, I L - - W Sa F• A.vo rv•w J Fes Artav~y B~tln ~ -' W ~"' worse Fee i•r I '" TOTAL fIF.CT RICAL FEES .. pl on N e ire t Pnr P o 'r e R „ L Cmm~~ B~ . AL/I AI ~ I W 2 0 MG 3~U '~~ rah nr un ]m ~ ~j / l (~{/ I ~ flo Ir 'Como nu ~„ e o e 1 MY !a 15 MP ~ 9ic p0 900 I ~ n . n',. o L J 4nl e , tl p WO clm O U u .d v ..r ~ ~, Q d :. 4 ~ V ~ ~„ W ~ T O?A. MEC'~'.APIICAL FEES j a ~ ., nm,. Peon r.> I W .. ... ., o:••. ~ ,.. • m: ~ ~ ... o ., w, ' ` ~ , sy,.,,.. r,. , Ch , ~ .,,.. 1730 • 7e1. 171 41 989-1 86 3 r-• ., ~,..~ ,... ., ..~ .~,.~. ,.._ ...,_ - m < , „ _. pn,.. I i , In ' '"P/' Y~Jr°f~ ' ~"" '~ J ` p rr •~ r M1• Turn Rl urmehr., EES TOTAL ELEC., MECH., 'LMBG. FEES 3/ice r n ~ A iF„ p19 ~!'r.~.7m=. m -drlJ o . ..., ~. .. i ~ ~ n p~PP=rly ~ -'I o . ,.m,.,.. ml n, ~. . me~~d , nyn.d onJ +ol dn..d, and 'v •! ~, . ~•dm,•J la, !BC d.y,. „ ..e wnh ~ . . ,,, n~ .n . it . ws-ErnoN sRECroR raTr3 UNDERGROUND CONDUIT _ ROUGH WIRING __ NEW SERVICE _ _ _._ ___ FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CIRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES ov<e, can. Alq _-_ RO MfCH __.. .._. -__ _. _, ._ . . . svoowx. vmn FAU/AC Unir FINAL MECH. v x / { F ~ ~ ~ ~ 9„„ snvro , ~ - _..._-_ OTHER OTHER II (: /IINDFR FiR ~'I~Wmo, _ __ _ ,.vVU" I I .. _ .._ .. I w,r.,V ca,, v.,.e. RO PLMBG . , G AS TEST SEWER/PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM ~ _ _ F''raru v, l.n, ~,, FINAL PLMBG . 5u.~ WATER HTR. v.,,•, vo:..,, ', n Pel VaPrt SEWER/PRIV. UISP. SYSTEM I 1 OTHER ~ i OTHER I I GAS UTILITY CIRNCE --II r 60PIDiNG ~ ~ ~.vrvv~r~ GA$ PIPING v~•^'~'. P~r'n t Gn5 TEST '' FIIJ4i F'(iOL N'r ' PINAI POOI. FIMB(~ n71~:R _-~ .___ W14'rJr :ION__ DALE ~i INSP. SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFETY D~ION city of rancho cucamo 9320 BaseLce, Rarlciro C monya, Cn.9i i3/0 . iei.l Z aaa ess l~ ,Cif ~~ ~[': Lol BIOCM iracl W "° owner v.. 1 a! ~,C Malllnq '~// J- AQQre55~i ~ ~~~ H ~ / ~" C. / /` ZiD i51 Comnolor ~/ / •~ C Atltl2s5 'd_C W crly no *el \ $:ale L¢ _ Ctlv W ^ 1 I.Ifr.NAflr fr1ATRA('tnR[ orR 1. Q u. r I .m ^... r •... r.. r..n..r,.. o.n ,., ... ox~vM1P~r I1Jrt:X RY.i I.APni111Y Z O I nm .mrn~ u~ i.. .. r a t I n. ,....~ ^r •n rnv nr ux• r• O ~ .~.. ...`/ .,n .. r • r,..... i... ., .., .,. m, n. ~..~rrv. .,~ m•r„ r.. p .~~.., ~•~. ..r. ~.., r,..,rm.. ....n..rn C .. _. (d ! !f ~--irk! ~ ELE(./ME(H./PIMBG. ga PERMIT J, 9a9.IB63 mo ~.¢rPl~en aaA l~eey e~,m<.r~ot har,m~Pu ._ .. _ F« _ _ -- gyn IS<~.<«~/b.'il., / _ IDZ W . ~~ h d S l J ~ ~~~~~ 2 / ~ ~ wr< rav a n 1w n, ml ~~ Forum .JL ~ Um ev _ _ _ _ I _ Q ~ ol~re' V _ ~~ IsP.a!r I _ L ___ OC Sa Fr Ar<e New ~ aeoe<~ual slaq (h I Sv Fr Arec IJew W Fn Aveoory gldP (n PIJn (li a f!! ISfuorc ~ . f<[ TO?AL ELECTRICAL FEES 'SD ^m ' ' F.e W FAU ro a ~,m~d ee~l<,'cemP. rM 3';0 BTU I'c 6 trclu! ] Hf ~ M Y FAU c.er Bole' Came' / rBB OBO ALI / l4f'l l{4f _ ~` ~iV MA n rr o A. Ynn L'er •0 8 ..rv ., u J n r ~ ~ I, lud IO WO dm f ~ . lql C u ~'. A S~ ~Y 6 0 icl..;~a ,or, -, e' IO,UM Jm , Q -d F:~ ~O?r ~ W ~ ,.,,.,.... Lc ~ ~~N ier f rornl nAEC FIAr~ICAL FEES i~D • . .r. r - ~ n m~e^ Fri . _ r .. W _ ~ ^ a r / / BM1 ~ ..... rn I 1 m y •~ .. Or ~ I t <I c Wgmr` ~ r J .. irv.~ a .. a 'OPAL RL4MBING FF. ES I T L ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES ,~ 5~ /~ sP<< / A coca i ~P x ~ - ~ ~_~yr 'r~ i ~l ~ - ~ ~~ `- ': JJ iM a elc n, ci/m•.n.,- vl/, r,me .g n• • n•~ly iill.d our. ne^an ~md . ~I~dored, and h wbl^rl le r.P^n' ~,. ..-4 Iwrm,.fu rr ur r,m~n.. r r rvmendrd of nbonAOneE lay 'R9 Aqr, INSPERION CTOR NO7E5 CONDUIT (-g0 7 - ~ ~~ - - - ROUGH WIRING - - ~ ------ ~ -- NEW SERVICE FIXNRES __ -. . _ _.__-_ _.. ._ rp~ ~°~- -~+ -_- _ ~ 4C: /^~~>K <v``~l 6«~ y~c Ail- __ ~ FINAL ELEC. INSP. ~~---- /~~~% -~-~- ~~ ~ --~~--- _ _ r~r c'L vJ ~~/ J~ ~`__ -~-~~-~- TEMP. POWER POLE __ _ OTHER _-- OTHER EIEC, UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. IINES MECH, o.rn, comb. ni,, RO . _ _ Seppwh, V~nh FAU/AC Unit FINAL MECH. Vmh, Sbe~oPo ,..-_. -. / /~(' ~.lq ~ ~ ~- ~----- _ _ __ ___ .___ OTHER _. ___._-__. - _ __ _.__ _.~ -. .. .I ._. OTHER - II r, /IINnFa F: P xd, wait. __ ...__.... __._--.- __._-..~<. =wvau I .. - ---. __-.......__-_- Woier. Gov. vols. ~ RO PLMBG . _ swvo,n. rimn~~ys AS TEST ~ I G i SEW'E R; PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM _ P"`°`<' vcl.«. FINAL PLMBG , s<,. <e, I v<~i v WATER HTR. ~ x<i vaw. _- ~ ~ SEWER/PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM I j _ I T OTHER O7HER GAS UTIIITV CLRNCE 60!vDING U.G. CvvivUii i I GAS PIPING v,na,~ r,s TESr ~'~ HFi~ :P " Oen~n~-~ ~~ >, mon FIPYVi. POOL ELEC. FINAI POOL PLM6b. I nil!iu _ iHSP~'r 710N Dl~IF INSP. SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ BUILDING city of rancho Cucamon ga PERMIT 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cuc m , Ca. 91730 =Tel 1714) 9891851 Bmldin9 _ d 'Tr L:'~: / r Add /fry ~~ (o h'~ N:. Er:,'.[r ~ ivpe O, ~~ ~e„ r. I _ ,r„ _ lol Block iroO ~ .- O<[ land _... _ - - ---- - - No. Dw. U=r Perm o'. d Umr AeOui red O _ _ _ No ~ ~ ~ _ _. ~" A Owee [ y 1 _'tc_„~'1~.~/z~<- ,-'- ---- Mailm ~ Na B=d-aomr APp~o 1 ~C~} ler Sim I Brae - Op.' APP APProvea m [ g y Addrar/ C'C , C ff l I i'i', 4 Pl.rn Di. ~{r~TJ Rre_Drif ____ _ V I Eno. [.~ ! i Comrc nor u .. Admr.r _` C l _ _ _ry _._- _- _. ZP iel. Vn,UAiION S Glr ,, Score Lc uf Nil r: ~~ 8 Clan~l, ~ PLAN CMKN r ~ - ~A<-' _ - A«h., EnBr~, r Dnr ner F.. .r~ ~~f !~ ~ 4/ d I PFAMIL ~ ~- _ ..i. S c g _ ..._ _ Aedreu , .~Id F Ae'.Y V.r t-.; .~,i .i C,. ~.r~ ' ~ E. s.,le crn ~ ~~ ~zp I< N: E~; ..n;rls ..~~~,~~~. .., _, ~, ... .. ._i. .i_~ I , rnvv r.P ~r.., fr,r iOTAL '~ , ~ ~1 ~ sP. 41 ) '.: •.o .. S•: et / ~ 5 / m ' nn~o ~ .Y ~r frn nrv r<. l ~..n ~ r © .f1 ll • ~ ..r. f ! T I. xn r. !~' " li.u: ~. ~. n.. Ir Nr..l ~. ~ evnri n r. nrrr ni r m I I ! ' .N I f ~ mu, . y/~~ r. q. 11 ~. I 1 n r:.:,. n,r-nr ~. .~.n.. r.~. ~.~. ~. ... , ~ vn ~~ '+ ~ '~~. r `..~I NAYrf '.r Nn INn'rrN i.. ir'v' .. ~ r . (o. v rnA..I ln.. 1 nn. e , n r . r ~,~ ,~~ ..r ...~ n r .1 1 • I r ~ n. N~.Ir .~~ m .~ , rr. n ~ N .'r i\/i .. ..iii ~~. • 'r .. 1 r 1.. 1 r, n •A N rl„ r m , rn ~ r~. eno~ r e r Ar ~ '•mn.ii r. ~ Aru • A m` .. w~ nrm ~.. O ~~ .. _ ' ~ ... -~ I- M ~ r.. ti-~1S ~ v- - iFn li n burlJmg perm oedy hued oo. rr nee mM1nmrrl, a~J r when ra erP'v l~on I wpr4 rbnrrvn der a nl rammrn..r~ ar t r.. ender. ~ pbn'AoneJ Ipr ~Fg r,.r r II r,(l A' INSPECTION RECpRD k } wuhDanoN ICS n, .~ _ „i .,:~~ - eo.M~, er-~ E~.~ .. INSPECTION NOTES E,eoe sae nr " s ~ a-.. - ~ I ~ .. PI40 Soy A n ~ I ' ___ nraSOr AV R I - ~ '. .: ~ _ j .,. ., __. -rt ~ _ __ _ _ ... ___ __ Gu ~ o I ... _ - _ _. .-.- _ ___ ROOF i ` _.._.. .. ._... __ _. _. .. r--. ~• .. .,adr .. l _ Eeanl c. m _ i i ~ ;~ I __ Pu /- . -87 I -- - c,.'..y lam... . . 1 , :NI~AIOR IAIrv ~-~i. NF. ... ~ ~ S~~P I.. ~ ~~J'IS/NLJ ~ /Q F~n ~ !S S '.apt, Jc •~- - ~ E~(; J I(F Z~~I' / (.(~ ... ~: ,~ I I i SWIMMING POOI/SPA ~, ETIAV i ti f. rV4 _'Y,'- nntl~ i~r:~.g,~ 6,, ~ „i ' e[., e B~` INSPECTIONS • city of ranchr Cucamonga RECORD 9920 Baseline, Rancfto Cucamonga, CA 91730 • Tcl. (7141989+N51 1_ /i i it Y I/ BUILDING MISCELLANEOUS ~K1 ~ ^ M,L, ACS"JMpI ~ I a wax ~__ __ f!. x•uz Ha.,ii , __ ~ a!~ J ro,mr rw ~_ l ~ ~ (, ' `• I ~ ~~ d F` PLUMBING SWIMMING PODL/SPA a,.,. sn:n n~~~~~l~'~ borFiM 41NIM5, PonIMiM paMmy h.rn nl v.l ~ 'IX'~~J yMlipna.~.I~C C.+dM u Wnn:; ~• sUa Gas iail i Ali L 1 c ~ ~ ! WS Fpii:i. 6', 5!f l 1 Sx! Gil6 ' ldll~l, ' r~ „y. i.. >xF.. 1 - ___ t ENGIN EERI DIV ION FIR E PROTECTION MECNANIf,A I ELECTRICAL ,., ti 91 ~ - - ___. - _ '~~ a-~ 4 / Imo- ._.-_~ _~.. _~ _-. I __._ PLA ,,, NNING DIVIS ION ~ ~,,,li I I I -- -~ - - - ~~:<v 7 ~ ~le:< i', - - ,'.r eemr - . •]_~ - H EALTH DEPT. da~,m,~~a ~- __ ___- ~~ ~.. I i,u. MIe Fpn ms{~. ~~ ~ ~_ .pn c~By IofRerancl~;acuc~aTmon~ga ~ iN RECORDN, . ~~ • • - BUILDING MISCELLANEGUS p..v i / ,.. ~ vlgs F: r,P~ --+ smox~ D.r n mM.. - I ve s n.l r .. p .rrr ~" o'l~.t % !ass Masmq / Amnl ~ 1 ~ Ndu " AevJ q ~,, yo ' ~ • " ~ ~ &am PLUMBING SWIMMING PODL/SPIT ~qF ' !".>• ~~ ulra.a~mr ~ 1 i i "y ~ ~ ~„ nmwq ~s1 /-~- ~ riw I c P e op, C I v,~ I ux.~yr.w u^cun ~ p,n• noc - !/` Ikalr -Ewvon ~. U'~Jpli SOLI OY4 - m n L n ... ~. K],eT '.y f Ro Ia r ^ r .- ~. kMd f218i p, Caul Ina'ns na rnl n _ Slue Pump^y ~ , ___J _ _- FIW ril lm !Ini IIYIVkIIM InSRfIW 5 f ',r~ I.-r. _ m aiN H ~"' _; ~ t ENGIN EERING BI ID ~- FIR E PIIUTECTIUN M ECHRNICR L ELFCTflIC L OA al! Ilrpr 4yiJ 'r. Sprm. ~.. ~ 1 1\~ frr J.J 11i 15 ~rl• cr'I C DI' y 4o I m^ lun 1 )4r nyp•ynu I J 11. I I I I .."- PLp NNINO DIVI SIDN ~°• -~" I P r. ~~ ~r~: ~ ~ ,sell '!+'s W. a.jr. / ti~w va ~ " ~~~ !I HEALTH DEP T. u. •Ir., _ I n. r - _ -_ nw ~aF ~ I• a RP! Fyn .i e s, ~ + ,h BUILDING AND SAFETY ~ SION city of rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cummon a, Co. 91730 • Tel. 171/ Bpm~s _ Aaar.N A < d6 . Z ~' - ~~-- cjW Own e!i i Mp~l~rA Addre„ GA .~ - Lv T.I. _ O Comma _ .., / ! J Aad,n, / 'Y ~ ~/~~ ~_ .. srel. L~,. cn 6 <Impl. ~ /. / i Lc No. W Arab.. En9c, Deugn. . r~1Q Aaerm--_ ra. -- EP. it -~ - _._. v ~rvc ~'.o Dw - _ ~ _ Sue__ _._ _~_ ,9o a Le~N __ 1 ~.. m.w " ALA ^ AN« ~~~ P.pp~, ~ „ m ~r. I.IfI V,V F.p IONTRACPOR.v II +'N-r, m r fumr:= u+ nr..N cnd emn enA n~r a. nnn nt,^iv,nen . ! lM Bw,ns rn~ kn(sww f . ullf rc.AN/w, ..~~ O ^I..i e. P.0.bLILUf'.N OIn LAN ,TVnN e r eM rm N l f N prnrrrn.r. u r L.enu V. r?. V m•I rL aW,iAr R+.,.r ..rnoim Inr r.Wnm nr r..,... Ar i, ~ n~,rr.r r.. a iri. r^n,rv ~ m, »..~. r • Ir.r r.Yn rr~ ~Nbrrli µ,qr I M L 1...-r. a:`. a C~~%~err x !ne ..~.aA~A^r,rner ,..u n."rNProw•InrrM~•prpe c~Inari ur n.tl., E ~ . ^/.w.r, m~, :m .v rN. I rr,m ..,, Lm.,l tV ~i .fir .. .+. r+r•r urlY C.+erMb Lw+u 4..1 a ; 1 I nor ...mor unM R___, 0..ep r„ rnr Inm .nnn~ V 19891851 Np, smr. Oa Npa- _ a<e•ppm, FPPrwM _ Plan An, Bpaiol Cmdmom • BUILDING PERMIT bP• a,. Come Group Np Dw. me Perm ~IPR. j'S" Jmn Aw,a•ed ~ n..,...n vewenoN s !/],i PLAN CHKK __ PEAMIT SYSiEME E __- 3 BEAUiIf SARK _ _-- __ -~_ OirEA Pecnt//a.~ &M1OPI iee pmt By _l«I-~ V¢_'iM Perm r r~, XF: RT' rn ENBATION OtFLARAT'nN A r nni.+n Nkm(iu ua/ro ~4,u vn rotor. a .. ref r,m,nmuum bwnn... rmu~N .+or .+..f „r s.•fn i. f'IrA r n YN vosr r °~r ~A• ~ MreLr furn~url ~~~ V• ICATIF k~f,;~ ;ON OY xrIRRP.0.9' rN PcNSATInN MGL'RANCE A.. n.„m rr.e as r mm rr .I rl r v /w nu %N•u JNUrr .110^~ ~I • pnf~rm of u nrr ~Vru ~sA4.m~•~,+a N rA. ppl.lr~'A.4T 1/~alln +a Y.rrrW fr..irwu a/ A+rnn~u• rn 1 ..-°. - ~-..~ r+ra rrreArn Oul rM .rnrY •cr~~ Nr f oR~fIION~'rY.NpING AGENCYU r inln, m.nrr ~ n r +b re trA n kMln. r for u, qt. EiNr feL i Inn.lnr Nrmr .ply DSO, ~py~ ~A M~'r nnm~r ,onn~~A? ~bnAmJ'1,y YeP~n~r ^~Mprrrt nrn~~ve~~~nre K ptvr of Ao01i rn1 /~~^T _ Nnil'iv nM,.~ !M a bmldin9 v m.r Men properly Idbd Pul, r 0^°'1 one rPlrnnhd, vnJ n wb,•cr b vP anon .1 .orL rbe,eunen o or .omme~ad or a w,pmdee c pba"donee for 'EC d=r FILE "~F'V r • - wuAAOenor+ Ic,. c<•:+. row, ,......., ~ ~-$1 Ro, R~~ sr R...., ftO0A15r-dBURS '~R_rR~ ,' BIYg., Spen,, gpyf ~ .nb• INSPECTION RECORD • INSPECTION NOTES MASGNA,' R I \b^a' le ~ n i.. en p-. fAA,PN(] Wnn GaF ~•.. pp,y,,, qq~•p Nm".~ 9-J . .. .. .v I + .__. _.- INSCII!',O'. :m'y tv.J.. ~, r Sc.md r ..... ........_ .... .. ....... ...__._........... Cn r'6.p _ _. __. _ _ __ _ .. 1._ ___ j F'~R[wALlS •n-.., .~, -..y»„ :n~~pr,r Lr-.: Clmrn rr. el. .4, R:IEVIOA lAil, frA/ N'e; ~ nq 4upnPl, Lnp. log^. a~~.. - FRIfRIOR 'Al'~ :' ~ rAn^ c, r P p x..l 3 F LiC 7 ~ ~ ~- ~ . ., .r r f.: i SWIMMING POOL/SPA '~ EY, AV v;',flf IFiP¢RS paa~.n: 6cnaing,~ . r ~ ~, ~ ~ _ f'~4inl .~. ~ .. .... .r I MISCELLANEOUS Ar -~ _. BUILDING qND SgFETY q city of rancho AS} #J~ - _-_1__-_._.._~__.___ -_-___... - LP~ -_. rel. ~_~~-._- ~ ( -` r _ - ~?~ ` Z b Cla4r ~euoae, "' ~ T" ZJ - __ _ be Nv~ /j X ~ ~- VAIUA(16N 1 Q Atld..;r ._ L V~-_ _ _ I. PUN CNKR oy _ _ _ ~(~ ~___ ___ PERMI( __ _ __ _ _,_ IMP Sble ~~ _. _ F G4AIM p E x _._, _A ConprUtlron t'1GC,~. /J ~ ... .. E sr4fM5 . .... - ~ ... _ __ nru ~,ir ~ PARK ~~ 1 Sp. FL _ i/1 Srse ~pr4 2 $ 00. T New `; ~~~ N fdd ~ ~ nrrw l~l On.rs 1 R<Pa.r ~ OempLeoR~ / ^Iw,i,IM1 mFr °Ifi tMy;.YrfO frIXTRA(YrIM1'fi IrY.ln °N fcl r\/°~/' u ~'4" ~I et In p A,nM~ .p /rH4 t111N Y ^Wtir".elr"Jl rm°AYUrno ~iIR.fllililxFR Nlf 4R°e~ upon. wn m. W.W A wvn. m A ~rrl~..°rMp ~r^h~in+n~° °,''nrx "'!x O r=,^r.r~° • r.rv n nor nnr ~4nv iii °r Orr°~~°p~~° OM1r'. ,d ~ mrftPt~ w Y°w I ~i4 /1C i.'(5 n~RA H; tA. ~~ M.n. n(I..nl In W 1^1 nu±4nr 1 wnt M1.i 1 o``Nr,°w~'^~` ~ f ry~rr,nA .n ~./'~~ ~~ .°n l.T~/"fir"~ rArmiu N. Q O~'m •mr ^~^uU^'..r.w_ ,VMlrwaiN•B.'... r. i.i.,~.. yM `IM W ' _..._ _~ ~--._a.... __ __.~r~ x,. ,...,i--~~_ x I/Y PvPIraPOn r BUILDING --_ PERMIT i No Dw--- Ure Pe/mn -- ~°~p _ I Unrh t o[Srxe Rppn°d -~RPN e!RN_M. - Q 4oProvtrl L__. ~Eng Nrv I._ -_ f eP~rx~_.~ 1~ Ll~ ~i '. .. _ n-'~__ ~ ..._ d {Pp ~•~~''I,b.vkrr~°mw„~^nu¢ fPNft'.VR't itr, Ir G'I..1NATrrrYJ y )r.r.• p M1n rr.n wr° n. • .~RM m! f.rnrvn n r> ,,r rerlrlrArie ~r r ,i,.:i R~. .. ryn u')gA'F,K[' CaY PI'.v Art ixTivF YM4 r ..r ..Mpnn'..>wtti r ~/ /1 a /e. Ry CA •il A^hr'AA/rI.R I~.W II~nT aw ILm° Anee'^An AMrvww r r°t 4'rM mw rn.rnv~rn mek a °/ R N ~4 ^ "r. ai UnIINViRI'rTii1N~^I,YNINVf,RCS~ •~ ...n... ••••'••... nl rE.~~a k I Ar.R Na un.urtinn m~~~ ~r~°~ i '~V ~V..dw u Inn~.r. v.m ~^ a 1° ~~" 'Sr. ly ,~ ~P. prrlnrm.n.. rmn . n.4,.., ~~ _ i r . ~rr...n U. ° N ° pv-' "'m,rm..,r IAPpn..r,ets ~u"y' ~i.,r"9~~. N.IRn. R.N rt.. ~ r i ~ AYI.. fle~~~~ 1 le 'n9 Pe.mll wl,.n PrOPNI T/r!!eA P -`--••_ .- ~._-_• .A N.r.a,e., . a n . r°a o ~ rr'la.pe.e u'heo,~,d ane „ ."hir<i m vn ror 19C Anp • INSPECTION RECORD • I INSPECTION NOTES - t«_ ~~~ ~3F'~Y r yy'~ r ~~' SWIMMiNb YUUL~~rh M!SCELLAN[OUS 864LDING AND SAFETY~SION city of rancho cuc wlr tal Z ~° W No. Owi Ma. ~/•\~ pdd LNL. C,ry c«. J ~' W `" E~r~~ enonga ~ c~- el. (714( 9891857 N,. r.~. Na. ~1 Fme _ aee,_ , 1, apo~w app.a:,o E Plan D _ fng Diw Spai X14 L caadN,an, ~ neacn _L_ y264 l _ .`.li `"1' _ veLUnnoN s 6 CIONC. _, _ ,. _ _ ~i~ Na_ ~I I ~ ~ ~J >LAN CMKp . , MeF.~ E pfYMN W o.,,aa.,~dlff-Land-Chris_COpher/Architects__ Q ^2951^0 Foothill Rlvd. II•I 9870909 FI onnlMecE ~j~~~ La .. ap vom ~ E ~-_`ry PoRanghn LLcaznonga ~ 91730 I1~<. Na C-9784 el svscMS ~/~~- 1 _ Clubhouse Auilding sl eeemi°_ - - - - - - I ~ „c: l Z o+NCa 2,1.}g .v.~ ., 1 ~;.., 1 sr ; vN;~l BUILDING PERMIT T_-.~___ w. ve.mn oo, e... L A.o~~ne ~ p.em~.e I Tk i rl-• N... ~J rldd !`' Iro I-' a.pv , ,~ Gemox,~o" _l a<._ , ~P" -~4R ' \ ~, :, / _ 9 2 IfFNFip fY1N'TpArt p 1,1 A l'rm U ~ u ' n L " x p' N. I N f 1 YR 1 ~ f 1 n vn. w:. , ~f ,LX 1 l ~ ` ' " I1~Oi ' "rt = rn n .I m ~,,.. enr n f .:. :/9w, . ' - ,I_c~, (aQanclari,m r, c r~ ,e r ,1 pN P.RNIII~I.F0. 1 FI i 1 nNe, . .,, , r.. ' v I rvc n / b ~("rn Nn1 O A 1 ~.^'..... W~ .,.e r~ls n. F 1 1~ N9 X N . . ~ ~ rv Iq Ii4 n P'"M ^ xrvpN .XS CNNAAN.V. '/ 1.Y I I Y Ffi l ~^ A ' ' ~ . ... . n I, er . n r engrlN .~ ~A. w I u /e. e<r <NrN a rr „IPo~ V (ia a i ^ , w HU..r r ::n ~1 yr~0m.nn "nfl T< .nri nn~ o< I ~,r ~U • 4 ' ` 1 • ^A n In ^~me r M b r ,{.~ „r u"I li.. s, Ir„ .. «, n.... IM" ,r. I.,," r..l uyr.r .nn~ .,, In p~l~l,l ,µ('^~".Il.r nv4+ el Ja_ r fi C M F .. ... ~ e l ~ r~ . A ,IA m" A . A n N" y .. .M 1 rn.i.n I ."ma"r . rve r e •.rnre Y ~ Awr n.f npnr In ,. A..Yr n.,.r. +r ,..,~rl• •A "I••""•• ~••,••••.•+ i .~ fr~ry Fip1~lTINN I.FNpIN~: A •• TNnnr~, r, Mr. rv.A "n.Y I.,wulr IA.maY n,r .a. /f 4 . ^••er1 ,Mr rvl, imar.e. . .... ...... ........ . .•f.... _ ... .. ~ .fir. ~.r ~Ar 1 r .. -,..rv.,.,., '. r., „rv.... LJ. a:"..., ". C n.~..r . ,w n<Yl,"a . . W ,n 1 . . ,A. ,..e.. Y M " ' ~ r _. ~ nA, a u,. e m ,mn .. - ~ 4 ~ :. ..1 .., ."~... rv,m ,. . i:; I.: GM~°I ., e L.,... N<m. Yio,11`er Sank /1~ -.,l u n ...,.., _. ..,,,,,+, L.I. ~nnm,., 11U N.. ililShi CP nve. N yjlr 1 _ . " ^ I" Y.~ .r ~ ,n ~ I " Q O 1 .m .nni „nn.. ,G ...~__~ X evl F. ,e. i...,"._~ y / ~ f 8~ mO ~ ~ ~ " ' N I V ~ nun iu nl AOen L~ ` T .. ~ FI L Mulm. Ape,~ 4_ ni7r`41 _l/~ I tAn n v E.Adm,a pnfmn wM" p~ape.ly gll.d md, ~ vn•d vnd .andoled, v^d v mbpq Iv If ~j ~ O(r~ ••p^onvn I wo.l IAn.untle~ n nm rpmm.,,..d v~ ~. ~mpendd m abnvev.etl Iv IEO evp • INSPECTION RECORD • ... RouNOnnoN: Icr. ceH:r, comp, ie+o. sel6aaL+, 3 ~ /7~ INSPECTION NOTES r«M, Remf. s.d, E,[e.<re~, V ROOR SW/ISIS.. GIROFRS~ MnF, vop Rprnm, NRp., Sporn, A[mv, Vmb, Tr. tmbr. MASONRY, binl,. Monar Lv,. Gwr Lfh. CbamOVh, Aolh. ROOf SHiG Nodmy piopF 91o[irng. Mohnol Grade and ibrtYnr~,, 4001 pram,. + fRM11NG Wolb, Ach., lvn.. BloaNnp, Bmneg. Nnllly, Bnd:np, pmpbr pm4 Srep+ INSUTAiION: i4 I ev, R Valaet Prprng. Sound Couo-mg. iIREWALL4 Mornml, TF.cknn+, Ca+:ver+. peen. <Iwen, Popbl. r INTEAIOR~. IAiH/pIVrWAII Ncdmg, Sopporb, lap+, loim Ae:nl EXLNIOR IAiM'SIpING MnF, '.Jmr r, Lapv Doper, lA:ckne++, EorLrrg, 4. fINAI INSPFll110r1 i.nn1 Ga:1 ng Gn: Sbpe nre p f. ea:~y nc.~. ., p Ha:: N~-~bm,~ Wen Sl,~nr ~. r' F.,T / Clen ]WIMMIry6 i'UUL/]YH EX<AV pfINF 4E10ACY5 Rnd:ov in 9anA~nq,~ EeG -" I F ~. S..en::n~ I fPM1~ .A'. n _ ... , tt .n MISCEllA4E0U5 .. I R: I T ! ._..._ i ;BUILDING AND SAFETY D•ION • ELEC./MEfH./PLMBG.~ ci ~ of rancho cu Y.YTlonga ERMIT 3...C 9ase '~N? ' 11e1. 714 989-1963 - -- No~ i Rancno Cucamonga. Ca. 91 30 ( 1 ..,n ,' 1.: _ 'y ne:anprio- iRaa,nonr. :tee ~ _ i ~1 Ct V No. _ - ____ aunCmq %. a m AOdmss _ ~ 1 ' F Sze I - Z Lal ~ B!ocx _T.aU ~ - -' ~ Om!eb W No ~'~ y~ 14e ePtotln LgM,. Swnlhal Ovm 1 ~ l Ma, n19 J _ C-.'. .. _ss 1!'Y y M o 05 I ~ _. AaOres (y ~ f O FP e ~1 Fev - ~ Z 0 Q ~ Ornr~ .~ . e V lspledr T~ ~ ~ so Pi Meo Ne+ C• I _ J ~ W Sa v~ nrm rvew (n' I - - -l06 ~ 4e, .e:e,ro,y x~d, $lal6 L ~i1y Fee 6 ciassl~ ~" TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES W I.I f. f.N[fl, f11NTPI.rtpe4llef.~xrmll....on. folr. .nA m. t ~• f Na 'Jaftriphon F!e Q ^ 1 Mnn _ ' 1 .'"' t rn: ~n~ninn• GI rle 'FAIL inl(6nl~o ! Bo~l<f,Cni~A rA HP ~' _ W I?^Cw n i U E~ ~• ~ ' ;eu a eodr Comp.. ^ i o.r...,e..m,m n~ r. f......,.,,, i.,..._ .._ .... ,.. NI oc noa x,u - I F~. W~" Su,p An rvc~lin ip A ' I ~ LJ 0000 c. .m-~.,.~~~-,. ~~1 ,n .Ime.~.~~. mr .,.,,,,~~~ n.n .._, -,._... ', ;. , ~ 'm 1 n n 1 ~... ..A m .n. ~... .m n. . .., ~ ~...a .....m ....r Q r 1 4. ~ on8er ..,,.~,. eoo~ Z ~~., ,.,mr, .....„ e... ,,,. ,... ~ ~I: nd°,.~ .~~.. F,. ,.i _ ~~... -._ ---- ---- w .. 1 n` - ~ _. _- ~ „iCi A ~1E ~a nt. FEes ~~KK f ~ o u 'n~ a ~ Do. t-~rO ^~~t>p~toaSA ~ p~-nnnwL.. NI Z r,. / ., ~O'S0 U .., ;, (9 ,., ,, . c . .... ; .. .... .. ~ ~. .. To1ni Rwr49~P: ,Fees lJl i 1 E " ` ~~ TOTAL ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES '~ ` !`~ ~ ~~~? (9 . ~ P,o.!„!d h ~ r,~d IdIM ~ •pbdm.d, cad ~. -L.^ .V^. Fa^'nl/p . onJ.mm.~~Afn i rl.n nr nbandonnA I80 .hn. whirl an .m ei e. ~ ..n ~ 'I '.. ~. 'JS '. IP': INSPECTION RE SPECTOR NOTES ` " UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ROUGH WIRING FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE ".__ ---__- - - .__--_-___.__- OTHER .. _ ._ ...__ ,_ - OTHER ____ _ _ . ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTSI REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH oua:, Corns. u:, -.__.. ' s.oF°.n, vmh fnu/nc unn FINAL MECH I . qmh, SM1umH~ OTHER OTHER LLG /IINDFR FIR 50'~~ WO1Q' I -.r. ,/r_ RO. PLMBG s°p~:h, fiwM1,.yr (~/ ~iJ t GAS TEST ', ~ SEWER] PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM f.~, o, e:~ Yn~:m. ~ FINAL PLMBG. s.~dm ~, ~~ , ~~J vm: ~ WATER HiR. v ~ v„ as a. I .. SEWERIP_RIV. DISP._SYSTEM OTHER OTHER GAS UTILITV CLRNCE. "~' 60fJCING I ~ i ~, i i G.AS PIPING v~:..~,L n.,~M1 ~ GAS TEST HEA!'P `oi i°~~ r I LANAI POOL fiEC I FINAI POO! PIMBG. O~HL' _ Ir 1SPF./'TION DAIf INSR, SIGN. BUILDING AND SAFETY D~ION ~ /MECH /PLMBG ELEf . . . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cocamcnga, Ca. 01'3C • Tel. !'741 389 tEE3 eedo:re n'o ! o<, ror uddmo co rm<,< ol Ira , : p P Z Aeere:: 9600 19th Street _p _ : , . o - ~~~ ~~- -- - - = ----- - ' tol Biocd iraol ~IS,:< ~~ C;J W No Clubhouse 'F _ _ -- - "- "'-- '-------- ~ omnn _ - ~._ Owner Loma Vista Woods, L[d. W 1- Ae<e0ro!le, L9My Sw•I¢Fn _ _ -- '-- -----° _ t Mdil:ng } frnrmn j A:Mress 30012 Ivy Glenn Dr., Ste. 150 y ~- -MO,e1 ~- -~ ------ ----~ am z~n iel 'i Inv m ~ 1•aguna Niguel 92677 ~ _ ..._ .._._ _ -_ ~ aF<r __ _ -_i .. O Convaelor Isoemir SflVagC EleC CL1C lne, _ S FI Arm N w 7 Aeeress ~ p , ~ ~ ~ e A<, d<,r:•I aia I~ ~' ( I~ ~~ J 1785 W. Arrow Hwy., Ste. 1 ~ y. , , _ Fr A N s _ ~ ~ Crty by iel W ~ .m .w p. A A eMa (A r .~.. U land 91786 982-8128 W ;a„o <r y __ .. score L:e cly Pioe Ut ~ a,.ara lee P '~ G'iJ n clss:l 461288 C-10 L~< No 003624 °° _ _ i _ _ W wrexxeu m. nrrl. TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES ~ `f ~ A ~+. ,rn,m mi,` wn nrm.., ° aNrt" No n<ro,nl.o, Nr n<,rr,or~or i<r Q ^ .p rmr.~..r. ,..:..,~ m. r °II r° W FAL ro d indua BoJm 4ompr ' ' IN,0.'g BiU Ir d In<Wd 9 HP i ,` ^ r ilM1Bml.m ,x I. _, ^°fnm onyx •,m ...:vor rmm n, r,,.r.,.m•. I i..,..:.. c,• ,n. (q ~ t iAU e. r ~ Bode' Campy. IW WJ<B!'J ~ o+.: 3 HP ,0 15 NP ~ / Y r r • »~ N' win S~,rp A~• rvord'm m d I :inn .iii m n. .nr, ,rr in. a n~.:^n^m n.. :r r ••«r to=ol. /O~ ~ n J I i rv"• m I"dud 10,000 dm ~ ^•'• 4 J f rF• r V ....~.. .. •„mrrv :.n. n.°.»r '• •• ,. »~ ~..... .,. V 4x 4cndler SO']Y Bo^:F.r Z O r ,m ...cop: nn.l.r ?.. I: . I ~ .. F ~ j ~ f.:.. i npd ~. a.r- I11,0.U clm m~rin, i ~ O'br° : . +.• ~~ Q • c • ---- • ~ ! ' TOTAL M EC HANICAI. FEES L ~ „ r r::x: W xx, x Ir r n n p r m. i rm f<n tc < O - ~ r V1 w r. I 1 h .n. P .re <ew rPx rr •v ri.x niu, vlTxn r u o-e. ~D.r Snrnm V enu,.r rout a....n .. .:.nor (~ r r ! n of , v ... ~ ~, " ~ P~,~ ~,I. ..rn,n rr< i C ~ _ . 1 ~ d f<. TOTAL PLUfdBING FEES ~ " ' " ~ r" • F " ~ T OTAL ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES <~ 3 <~ D. ~ ...~.~., ,~: ,rte~ _ r.. ~/~T/xT hr :, l_, ~A rsn~, SCO 1 _ x. ° ,. ,.. ~ r:o ev ..,,<a r ~, ~ c., e. ~ _ L 1_: lrl. t~.A )l78` _ .~ 1 ~Voi~(I ~Ual[ 1 / n\ N° . m~A ,r .Lrr,~.,,1/m.rnm ~,yrl,mb~rp r m, .f..r p,op<nr I~n.e r yea ~..e •xl~exl<a rya ~, ri .r`rE!' 7R COPV wbied re e•n ,urn : »ml !5.•e•.A.- n n comm. ." n wm«detl a. obondonrd br 160 dop, p. CONDUIT NEW SERVICE I FIXTURES FINAL ELEC INSP.. ___ _ __ - ~~ `w ~ - .___._. _._ _ __.____ -___ --~- - ~_~-~--~~~~~~ TEMP, POWER POLE OTHER OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. /% ,j i ~ U. G. DUCTS ~REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH. °,~; ~°~d n TAU/AC U .~. "~ ..: _.._. _ _. ... _. _.. _ .. -- -.-_ FINAL MECH vs~n sn iwi I ~._ _._ OTHER _OTHER __.__- -__-._.___ U.G.IUNDER FLR. s°'~~w°'"' j .___. ..__..._._____.__ RO. PLMBG, w°.r, w~, nm:. ~~ ~ ~ - - - -~~~ - -- _ s~ooo~n, ri°m~~3: GAS TEST _~~~ ~ '_._ __ i _ fINAL PLMBG, '~"°"''v`~"°' I _ Servo I WATER HiR. v`"' ~° ~''' _ __ v.<n ^d~ von,.. SEWERJPRIV. DISP. SYSTEM .. ___ . I CTHER OTHER GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. ec":DI"1G GAS PIPING m+'•~~°i ~•: ~~~ ~ GA: TCST , HEAfF- C'ewnna. ,~.m, sr.., nu INAI POOL ELEC. FMAI. POOL PLMBG. OTHER j INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGN. SEWERS PRIV, DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM BUILDING AND SAFETY D.ION ~ ~ • ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 332,. 6asehne, Fanchu C~wrrrorrga, Ca. 3. 730 e .e.. j7i4j 3d3-. o63 eumm~s (p ~/~i ~ REQ. no Uumehnr !adarr~o",, crmm<r«L, bra~nnrq rr< per al0~x .roll/are 2 It.< , ~O _ -ow<r~ - ._ .1._. __. Pxner ! w lees r L.BnR Swncnevl _: _ _ _ L e, N Mallin9e `~S ~/ [OA /[~ Y r~+rure, aoere / (.O L r~ Mar,rv arvF- Nd Iz~o9 ~/ rei ( d7 -' '~ lex <" _ I _ g j ~r~r, I - comraeror ISPeoM _ I ' L iR c ~NC, g se. rr Ar<n r~r, Aaaress a-,~d<,.xrl aid„ ~i r cn OSHA s.S no 676 ra~s j-SOD w vw, crf s (~ -- slate be cnv rr< II ~•r~r^rr rm b Clessu ~ / ~ ~ L~c rln ~ - W 70TAL ELECT RICAI FEES I.ICY.MSM MNTRnrtn0.b plfr..lflATIrIN Q lum .mgr k~i.~..« m.e.ev r'mr rt o. W /~' ~ fAU'm bin iva I ~ Bouv Compr. n Icrl In ••nA r! nM r ~ IM,p9p B'U ~ 0 6 Inard l "P 6 ~~ m.r xyrFRUlr.rp:R n fux'irny I I r n ~ / ~ FAU m r ~ ~ BoJr"Comp: ... ~_ _:.."_ .__ - •m ••.•"rl rmm r............ .__ ...,, , . Ian nw<sm /P ,... ~ by :e Is NP !D 00 i r. F',~ ,np ~ A.. NnnAln ro 6 i O :,..r... , ....a,,,r m, r,.. e. .r.. i..,,i..~,.r .m~....n ...-ri V,• Q r vW r j " Ld IO.WO Om Sm,Y B..... An • .ntlkr Z ~ m ..nnn, a"s, w.. R . r . n rn. ...., Z Fd. , r.- o r IO UA fm I + ~' JrFer ~ ~ ~~<•~' ~~r., ro r.= .. r .,. ~ ..r . ~ r.. w rIr c s nn 7 ,PG ~ TOTAc M(CHANICAL FEES ?~ L W r Ci q Pa +.. y .., M o.e r i U ~ ~ N B _~~ v b. V .n rnr R ,_., r. V '~~R' i r •~ C y' .: m .o-, o' n ~~ A~_ }, ~ r ~ __ . r. . ~ 1 J [., ~ , d ~ TorAL ;urno r c FEES ~ ,.. .. - _ ~ •' %~ • ~m•~ .rr r~ ~` ` ; ~- ?_' ~ TO AL LEC., MECH., VLMBG. FEES -`~ 1~ ~( Q /s`E' ~.. ~uE w vrn+. ~- Z3 ~ i,: ,~x• ~nl3 `a'0 !!at'~'2,zG, ~ v.,"r 'v i~a ~i oer~ .,• . s," r'r p~,~mr,"v r .,ry r.... .d voldm oon r r.mr-I r...~. ., -„ ,",.r .. r „.p<nn.= " ,drenap".f ~riw emr L.^., "4B UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE FIXTURES _ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES o,rn,, coma ~I,, _. __ RO MECH ~ . . Svpparn, Vmb FINAL MECH. vewec as _ ___, Yr~e _Snurox, ' .. _ ._,.. ._ _ OTHER ._ _ __.-. _-___.... OTHER - - - _ .-..__ _.... -_ __- xa, wm.~, I I f, II INOFP FIR I _ . ' wm.,; aa,; v.°iL. RO L I I . . P MBG. Supporh, FIO,M1inp, L GAS iEST~- -~~ ~~~~~ ~ -- - FINAL PLMBG. r"'""'~ vol.«, WATER HTR. ~~`"'' ~'°'""' -_ _ _ w, R<~ vobe I - SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM I OTHER t OTHER GAS 1J71U iV CLRNCE '~ BONDING ~,~ . li V.V. ~VVV VII GAS PIPING arm„,~ , Gni IES~ ~ ~' ~~,r on y Ff ui~i rlJ(J . ELEi F Y FINAL POfII. P/MB~~ ~~II ~~R ~ ~ IN$P~C PION D,)TF. INSP. SIGN. SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ ELEC /MECH /PLMBG . . . ci!y of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 B li R ase ne, ancho Cucamonga, Ca. 9!?30 . Tel. Q! 4; ^°O~! 9E3 swlmnq ve o.rr,: r:o. Vee,r o.r l I c ~ , e r ~ p F ,,MM / 2 ~L- AGO F , _ . ° em _. r:~ s: . o _ ± - ~~~ ~ ___ ... Z roL6 !~, rj - CCCV Ser cn l01 F]IOCN TldGl ' M ' F E' ~ e S•x 1 _ . t ~ -_ - - 1 _ _ -~ W p {~ ~ q ~eG ~ ourl.y e Own ~y N r (1. l~ W N ~ IRa.elrrln '.~ynr.. Sw.mM1erl _.._ _~_. . MaAlnq , aaqusa ~. 4 - ~` ~ / ~ ~ fu r . _ -._.__ - - (.''.. e r + C: /e, ZiO ^ Ii`~ A.S TURYR-~P K,. IMR e , 1 ~ ..~ _ _ comraclor Iiv.oy I Ama Ne. S R AEEress ~ I . a. R°s•a:°xm amg (n IVV _ F A N s _.. _ _ env no Tel ~ r :ee ew a. W W Res Acenory 9ida N Slate tic C:IY n iM1L ~ luuan<e fee 6 Classe Lic rvn Fee i __ - _ TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES W urcrrsrn merranr-rnns nr r.Aaanm m :: rr. r ° " Q r Oyu. mi. . iP G'.: ~''::I°d. r "..°';:. r::~'":r. .. ~l "".::ri".`y ve. n:rrr~eeos Ne n.romnoe ' 6._ FAb ro a :r.we am ~en Cemm H IM.poO BRU m 6 mrlod a MR pl rwnraevnm:a molwxnrlnn C t N FAU '~ Po~'~e~2omnr n ~ ~ r I ~ '` r+ w.`:,,:.^°.. n., I ....,m,°r n,..: .n. rrr:,,ar,. r...r» L. r:.. rn. T loo n~ or ' e w'~ : t HR r~ Is Nr _ O Y , rpmr .w .. .. ~. • ' ilr Wna SorF - A L Mo:.tller •0 8 r ' - ~, ., ^ ` Q H..,,.. m (-«:~.e~io,aw r . .. :::.. :. ....~,. ....n ..r~l r .,_ U ~,.., .,. U ,m.n., u V $Cnv 3rr Mr nrdrR.~ , Z ~ ..m ..T,°, .r,., w. I.. r , r... . ~ ' Z ` '. Fnl,n.n , or,. e.., in oco I°. 'v r Fnr c*. r ...,, , . Q r L - r ~ ~ rk~ ~ ,..~~-„ .ee c• r . ^ ~ AN!(:AL FEES TOTAL MECH nrrrv n I a n ^ nxxrns , '' ' e rn r: I 6r ~m Fee ,. ,~, .,iB: r..o-,.,~.. r....-.. . .... nm n..r,r ,.., n•° z, retu cm x W ..a •F :d VJ ~I R,...,, Se. x.. I P 5rn.., V . .: r ~... T.. i v. r~r ~ i ..:..r ~ ~ r., ~ ., IOIAL RLUMBING FEES r. ;°a,. ~ =' ~~~ T p7AL ELEC., MECH., ~LMBG. FEES ~ -r" 'D ~ . ~ ~ ~ r .q/?0 v,. _ v~:n,,,~r coy. iAil elet tot/mf•Fan mM1 n9 r n:~l ~M1On ,rly : ii.. n.d i.,l .o:. Aalnrr nnA r 1 ~ i wbi.r l b on r: on •m4 :nm.,r y°~ " ~mm,. c n wmeM.d o abonuoned Im IM den, INSPECTION REC SPECTOR NOTES UNDERGROUND CONDUIT i ROUGH WIRING I _ ~y ... .. ..... - _ _ __. _ ... .... __. _._. ... -_- '~ NEW SERVICE _. FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. __ TEMP. PUWER POLE _-_ __.._ _. ...r~ - _- '__ L.. .. . OTHER~.('~r~(~CVJ,~RY"/.~ SC~ / ~. .. .. - .. ... _.. ~.' _ . OTHER I _- -. ELEC. UTiLITV ORNCE. E U. G. DUCTSIREFRIG. LINFS I RO. MECH. o~un, coma. nor. .. s~rooro. v,m; I ! .. ... FINAL MECH rnu: nc umr ~ v.,n, snworn _ _ _ . OTHER ~. .. _ ...._. _. ! I OTHER _ soar. wars, `, LLG.~UN DER FIR. ~ I work. G~•[v:: r;,~ ` ! f ._ RO. PLMBG. S~rro°~ n'+:`^e: GAS TEST SEWER, PRI V, DI$P SYSTEM DIAGRAM FINAL PLMBG. '"' "~"`' 'vVATER HTR. °r" v";'"` ~ i ,;; a,' va,.' SE WER; PRIV. DISF. SYSTEh1 ' OTHER I I OTHER ' 'GAS UTILITY `LRNCF i .,.n'Ir~.:,yr. r. 13I GAS PIPCJG !? U;r., ."r n I 1 a Ln<, iLSi ', O HFnf ~ ~. .,,,.~,o`~. oh , lip Fr~al Pr/,i 71 Er > r 'I I I'NAI u4Gl PLME~. R r NS~'f ~ 71UN DATE ~ INSP. SIGN. BUILDING AND SAY ION city of rancho ucamonga 9320 Baseline, Roncho Commonga, Ca. 91730 • iel. 17141 9891851 ~r o.~r, ... -. ~~~~'_ McJmg ~ .( Addrrr ~~~(~ _ 1.~. -.-. . • BUILDING PERMIT No TYOe Qc. No~~m ICortr - ~~-_- ~ - ~ - G~ouP Oa. load _ ~ Ne pw ~~ _ Ne vermn _ _ ' Unes I a<ar~,<a __ _ @v Rev. I ~ LReRO~r<e G Ne _ ~ Lor Siz< ~~ GAPN BeJmamr I yze ~~{~~/((~~ `Pprorea Qr C APn~m J 1 ~ ~ D Plen p ~ AaProved _. .-- r ~1 , ng ir. ~ _ _ ~V,-_/~'I'C Frre Dsr___ Ciry A.aM1 . Eneo W Ouigm , ~r ~ _ Addrert r ~ iel, l c No. T v,opos<e.._ ~INr ti.1.n ! nr~, ,_ ,~.. sn Fr ,r i . r 1 r f r Fev A' 3 .- r r' x r ~ r m...... .. .nm ° r. r. V ,J ,~ ; ~ ~ ^ r . .., r A . ,, ..... . a ~ I r,.r ,. , VAIUAriON S Irr•'Gr'~ PrArv CMECx T PEFMIi I / a / / ' r ~, h, 1 c $vPFM$ I PFVU+ir I B PAPK Vsa~u.' r...• ~ TOTAL~~, L e VC err;1/ \~. ~~ ~~ O ~, ~ -M1,.r _~I. m.. ..,~ .., , . ,.. „ . ,.. Iu .r. „ . . M1 -„^ ..._..... 1 ~ r. " . ,.:r IAn n bvedrng Prmw .1=. p•o0erly Rued eor nP+•- ,rd •cl~dcr.d, ord a w61rn n,p Lnr o~ d .m1 r .,.rM- n • r ~n +. v or r rmoerJotl ~~ ~dmnc •M Im IAG aayr '!'.vfr 1r~LOP~ . INSPECTION RECORD . (OUN9ALIOV ~G.:•~s r ..; o . ~ ~~ ...... i F„m,. R.~~r F,.r~, r.~.;::,. INSPECTION NOTES FLOOR SIAJ •JAr '.~R-Fr .:.,, p:.. ,, I •... -_.-._ -_______ 01V~ Snc+~ A.-uu v=~~~ '~ ~~ ~..... ~.. r., . :. Cba~ Oms. ECV ~ ~ I .. _ _ _ __ ._.. .. _ _. .. .', ~~ :.r^ p.. .. .~ POOF 5~" ~ ..... ~ ' i w .. .. .:.. ....:.., r 40''..+4 3c.1 .. .. ~ 1 ... n INSUTAi!Ow .ss cV:'..rs fr~.i. °c,~n 1=...~ _ .._ -__.. Co.e,.y pREWALIS 'A:~e~^ *r .~ ~~ , ~~ C'~asert ev.F ~ ' mov Ja~~ ,"~ ' EMtER'~OP ' e'.. :... ,s. Fn•.... ~, ;rs _ ~ __ I Po Pe:. i:..~L. r:• ..~ . ... ..._ _ j _ - ~ f:oei _ ii . ... Fir. ~ n ~ /~ rii ~ L (.l /'~~~ ~ ~I .. • .r .i Ce. SWIMMING POOL/SPA i E%r'4v ~ '.LiY:s'.15 :-dis f• ;,3I ~~ Fn ~ ., ~ ' I rr... ~.., ~., li MISCELLANEOUS vF~.. j F. i Z 0 \J '~ Z ~~~\) \{ V O C y~ L a BUILDING AND SAFETY ION ~ /PLMBG ElE( /ME(H . . . city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 9aseline. Ranc^o Cu c amon5a, Cz. 9!?3C . ?cl.;?! d) OEO ! 853 ~~ y BmIEm9 ~1 ~C-Jil .µ ~ Ne, oem.rphee__laddnren,. Cemm_vL Ivdunnop fee Lol eraX Tracl ~' ISize 1 NO W _ ~_ _ _ -_. _... _. _._... ._ _ _ _ __I Ow - ~ _ -, ' ' Aecepradm. lighh. SapFUI , ~> r --- - I-- Mseng ,~ ~ I C: ~ N ', fivrorer ,.. ._. .. ._.. __ .. . . _.. ,_... L noares: x ~ ~ GIN C ~ Z~ Tnl 5~J C d ~) J QQ NP eo I erM1.r ~' ~' eonuaard ~ ~~ J ~'v~' U p[ t( S / H~ a 5 Fl rlma New ) Npdres~ / % l ~ ' ~ 9 iaidmnal BIJ9 ~ ~ _ .~ ~ !L i, • ~ - a; r. ~ ~ v ____ _.. ei~e~! ~ uF°~ ~'~ c 7C~ ' dr ~ W r< ><, R«,,,pr, ado n : r Stale Lm -~ ~ Gly ~ LI-~ ' fev CM1r ~ iuov.ce f« ~ 6classrl ~ Lm N0 ~ - crnnP.n mrrnnrtrrne nen.nnnnn. ~ r. TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES ^ . .m~ m ...-n ~,.,., < ,..r ..~. .. , , r , n .r N, o<,<. prr No o<r<r~pr,o,r _ ree . . , .„....... . ~.~r ~7... a r. ~ Pnu ro a ~. n ~ r. md<r, (ampr < I I ~ I IpJ.WO BID 6 In lod ] HP ^ nx'\r 0.BL'11.1~f.P irl~r.anniin,u N AU o.e~ (Bn~le' Compr ` 1 slim r6, 1 .m r,.mcr rrtm rF r.,nr..nnr. I... °.. la. r.,. ~. „~~~ ~ • } 100090 dIV ~ In rlHO ro IS HP < M f"r w„", s~,o I ^. H„cr<r ,o d i J ...~. _~~~ M r.. ,.,n .... ~.. .,,, ,.r..,. ~,r.rr.r_r ,. .,r. .. ,r .,~. ~ r~ <IUC I.J (YAJ e(m , ~\ U ~...r... .,, .,..r-... u. o .. •.,. r.,,i. ,.-rr. r,.v - n r,.n..i .° u v, NpY . I o . Hv°E'nr ! I .m ..mn, a„r< . ~, ~ r, rn. ....- w L Z ~~ fm ' Oahe- ! ea ~ `. l. _ S T I u .. r . .vr r... ' _ W .__ _.__ '- _----- ----- ' ~ TpTAL NrECHAPJ!CAL FEES ~'~ r, ^ ,.rrnxr:re.. rrrnro,.,an. r unernr. ,°, r r rm r..p' i o.,., pro f.. . .. .m. .., ,: _.r ,..,, r ~ ~, s ~ I .. r. ~ w.. ~.. , ~~. , I ~ `I P ,• •'• ~ h i .oror <. w.r~.r H<mo, ..r,.,.' .,,ur,,, , r. ~. r. ,. 5<,..r, ,., fyanm ' ; .... ,., .m„ ... ...... ..... m..,,... ,. ,~ ... ~ '. r, r.. ,,r- , n„ r, •', 70TAL VV.IM RI4G FEES ° r+y1 ~ >~° p ~k~, n T OTAL ELEC., MECH., PI~EABG. FEES a .~4]~ / , ~ Pr' ~ ] ,.. ~Yar.dar n° t' ~.. ~ _ r______ _._.~__ ~.r. i ^ f C f lM1U ° ~vl/ma.Ann ,~/z. °g n .M1en p'< erlY hllea arP"r and .,Ldprrd, v~d i ^d~E';TOr OpPY r.hi~< rp ..n ~r ~ .or. r ~ =„rd.... r,. ..r-.-.,~ ~. ~, r.merre.d o, oh,,,do~ee fp, rna em,~ INSPECTION REC SPECTOR NO 5 UNDERGROUND CONDUIT __ ROUGH WIRING _ _ ___ NEW SERVICE __-_ __________ _____ FIXTURES _ ____- FINAL ELEC. INSP. --,....------- ~ -- .L ~ - .... .~~.- _ ....._- _-------. __. ...._-_..___-__ 'x.53 » ______ __ ____ -~~"~5-~-- -- TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER OTHER ELK. UTIUTV CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH oum, cwnb. w.., s.vvar,, v."n ~~ r~u~ec u~a FINAL MECH , vs"n snmom OTHER OTHER I I __ ' w U.G./UNDER FLR ~ ~ ; ... ..__..._. _-__ _. . "~ " " M1 wog«.; c6+. v."n _ _. .... .. ~ GAS TEST ~ ~ SEWEP; PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM ~ r'.r~,.:„ v°~,.,., ~ FINAL PlMOG , __ __ s.~.~,m I i WATER HTR °en1'v°r""' ~ . SEWER/PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM I ~ , OTF!ER ! ` OTHER I f , GAS UTILITY CLRNCE. 3ONDING i, i.viJDiiiT Mere, GAS PIPING °~, cmrn ! I II GAS TEST ~ HEAn F' ~,°~,°"`snw d~ y FL`:AL POOL ELEC. '' D FINAL POO_ PLMBG I !)iH k INSPECTION r DATE INSP. SIGN, Z O \W ~_ Z c`j L O _~ I r C N r ' ml o. a BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION city of rancho cuc ~~~~""n_ «'~p~, . _ __,._ _._ _s~~.tzt~CC _4r~i-- ------- a ~~a~ ~ _ S~ ~8tmdb~ ~?/rt_ _ . _. ~n M1 r ry Vl rJr Fp'A e L 'R nrTnh: mmRrLp Ails rJ...n. .r. ..i n, '.'," ' 1i' '"""i ,'n'".'w~ . ~'I r `r ' r~...... ~, n ^ N J ~ , r. 1j ,L '~ j ~ F1 G ~GL r.. ~ ~..,. r ~ ~ . r. r ~ r. ~ r ,r i ..,~ , m. ~m r~ ^ r ~..~ ~,. mn rr.,r.. i. n a i ~ . ,. ..., a ELEC./MECH./PIMBG. ,e5, PERMIT ac onr.muon Uddn~p Cpm .al. Indon•,ep =,<. - ~„..p<5 , _'~ o~ll<~~~ leleQhone ~?uc>!-h~7~! IRapro<~o LBFtI. Swrl<M1a p „~r<, j MgIO.1 ,np .o I o~xo Ispenb Sq N dep New Rmtlem"al BId9. ~^ Sq F Mm New pet Acanoq BId9 5<5 pl~^ «R 1 . p<e 5.~ ,~,« ELECT RICAI FEES No. p Onn~pep~f <p~U .0 6 ~+l~d ~ "~ ~.z o0a e1U N 1 FnU e.o Y Ix ooo a*u N • P. Wol Smp 'j IMenbt V ~ s^•or a^^ r. Z e..~..r ,r^od i Q v..r p„ ,,. i 'cud .. ~.~ 7- t p,r..r {p nb I Dmmpro+ BOJ<•~CO^•pr I ~0 6 i~tlud ] rvv 9:.rr, i e a+e~ ] NPmro rS HP n r rv^ndin ro b r !'~ud IB GCO .Im r IC 000 <Im I r ~6an -~ I V fer ~.f.'rn.< F.e W .~, .. r. v ,~i~,. „r „tr „~~~. ~ TOTAL MECHANICAL FEpS ~r. _~....,.. .. .. ~ .,. .. G~C`~;~~liScCl1~10 ~,~ya.r. Ry ~ r . ..... .. ri L~ r%P1r~~ ~ ~„ ~ l~1%~3 N .,.r,. .v 'n.. .,.<rt ~ ~ N h,.. .. > . ZI ~I !',r !~ I+ I ~~ fee I ... ~~ WTAI P U~dP.ING PEES~ ~~ L EC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES TOTA E L 7 •Sn ,p ,, ~ ~ ! Ay ' mdm ~. p^r. ~~: ~ =.n. ..e- .I v ~,n,r m. .e., .•4 rn..d r..l. „~., r.d +n mn.r ~~n r wM1i~ ~ •w~mr d ...n re.r,~~~ „• ~~ r a r.e 1^. r1J dnrt~ ., cr,ipG .,..,.'Y ~:. INSrECIION RECOR I INSrECTM NO UNDERGROUND CONDUIT ROUGH WIRING NEW SERVICE _ _ __ FIXTURES __ FINAL ELEC. INSP. 7c' / f'~ ; y ~ T~ r-~X. pr rc7 C- ,rE?C ~. v % TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER - - __ .. -. - - _. _ OTHER ___ -. _. ____ __ ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U, G, DUCTS~REFRIG. LINES RO. MECH. wcu, ca,an. u,, _____. wvvam, v.mr - __ - ~- Fnu/nc wa FINAL MECH. ___ - _____-__- --~__--__~-_ ~„n. sewanr -_ _ ._____..__ ._____- __----..._- OTHER __ ~ ~ ~ - - -~~ - OTHER U.G.~UNDER FLR. xa, wars, car. saooam __. RO. PLMBG. wm.r, ca:, v."n, _ .. _ SuPW'p. Flas~m9r '- GAS TEST . SEWER~PRIV. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM _ fINAI PLMBG_ r"'.rer, vaG.,, ~ s<r.rr„ { j ~ --~~ -~~~ vMr, val.n WATER HTR . >nn. Rel, al.e SEWERI PRI V. DISP SYSTEM OTHER OTHER GA$ UTILITY : IRNCE fSONUING 1 r r U CON DL.. J r (~ SAS PIPING Mmnrai "<aro a cns tESr j ~ HFATfa ' C'"""`° a"~~+ro SFUball ~ FINAL root ELEC, Ir FINAL POOL PLMBG ~ _ OTHER INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGN. ~..~..~ O1 .~1 W 0 Z O V n ^C` W a "D BUILDING AND SA;ETY ~SION city of rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline, Ronffio Cvcmm~ngo, Co 91730 • Tnl 171 d1 9p9.1 A51 ~ BUILDING PERMIT w~leire 7H 9 Ne. qp• «.. Mdr m r ST - s,~N.r_ <e~,l ~rWp _ [ I el w t a x ~--_ fw ____ «v. ~ ~~ No. w u ve,md De,, w. ~ooe I u^ ' ____._ x~_r,N.d ^ e vN.d~ ^ . Own v eKY ` 4 w Ne, bx. NN ~ , ______ _ _ A-~-rv~ Moillnv A~7Y( Addr 7~~ ! / ~ E~d,o _ _ APPrwr APProredt~~t. APProved Plvn D ~ ~ fng. Orv(,~j 1 5 fire DrN. I cl~kN ~,__LVI irv B73C1C7/ -- _~ Y1 cuNa ~~n.r cprl„<,~ IG N - w I z F - - - - ~ - --------- Aeev.vy ~ ( F~fl'.`~ t fJ SpN ~[ 5 /`1 ~ f _ _ .. - -_-._ -.- - ciq~ ~ ~N 78r( .,54/><.4~/i VT T~ vnwnrrDN s F;'- - ~' // / Slol. La ~/O ~~S V-YS1~pE/O Y"L 6 <lonil. PUN CH[CN __ Arcb., FnBr, PERMIT -J I / _ ~~ Deergeer _ _ _ _ _ A _.. - ~ -- -- dereu ---~----~hl G JiAihAGi { som .-. GM - ._ - - ILP E I ~ L I N,. E SvYfMS I _ v nposea ~--~.. ,,,~ - 5 xvnunv I ..,,,... r,..,.., v.. ~. ..~~. v..r .,, ... ._.-. ___ AQ~YLI L_ FAkc f. rQBh~/N6 vnvE _ _ ___ _ _ s ev 2 e` n o ... ,.o ,r.a xP~ ;re rml TOTAIi _ ~. . i, v N ~ nee ~ 'i Ax =i i '_j F...~ v - n~ ne D r x egan ~ ; oxma ~ear ew k I:o ~ I I M rlfum Rr r lea I nn~JA n flp nr o nFV mrinan. ot v N'nPE':0.1q fOYPYN9ATNIN VF.f I.ARA~IrIN r'+fr4 of n,n~n f.rnwre, nr r fl~ ~ r ~ m Pr r I b rt ~rl~r ~ r l P B ^^ ,~ (~ ~ tmn f nl rM +n+rr~ uA P... r n fxl~mnn.l rl en ~ ~ ~ rr m =r ~ .+~lrnn nrvrvrre rr r.enr< r` I ~r N mor rMml r n .lW. = ~ y I ~ 1M in iw l lerte ..l ll t r -- -- ~ - --- - - - ~ p vg~ ~LYV/J f s~~ S~ ~ '0.PL'II.Ir Ffl Ir I me I uv 1.=rn I.. IM ^ A n _ _ ~ i. lrlM (Mrr16(rM mgr u ~wi ~A IAr rrtP ~~ rt . f•.nrNnl~ i I}bVrn; ~nm lMr n N r n~ Ir rr pr ' IXX fIPEf0.if. Oh' G'IIf:YITION PMN PYPP.N9Ai1nN IN9V0.AMf.E nN y"' n m+l nl . : ~... rr.. nr. n.r wwgrrr! rl rM p u /or nr A.MrN Igbrr r,rEOr r r ~/rt N ~ , ~o , Mn ru AU.lr ^r .,f^,m +;f ; Art r n I pa m r,...a r. , r-.. +._Ile r _..... ,.~. Ir~. A..,..d ~... ~f.,. '~ n r n n. lr ..n. I,, .W l ..:, f~.~fo.:.. • •r ^ ll, r n•bn nlrlrr. r el Frr ' r `f Y ~ Y m..r .rnnv.rn +n _ N rrnn r.rvn ' +I r~ ~ • U nT0.1~ !`f10Y I.ENIIINf. AG¢N~<enV~ r tAr prrln m.rnrr f ~ ' r r b II. M . ~r rn ~ ~ .I ilrr •nrir In ~F.. IM~. CrrYi r •RirA Nr~ prmmr rr r•rvM m grl IAr nrrer. rr..e rlrr r nnr rriu n. r + ~! for r.r p e nl d. e I~na.r r Nrmr ___ r rn rr=I v'ivri. ~r lr +mrrv V n __ r~n0..r AM..u ,. r.., ,...n, .M A....rm r. , .ri.lr P ol..u .~nr.p .~,.I.nrb..~ri J E r __ ,. r ....r I Irr tA. Imnn .+ r rMr .. M g ~. •. ~" r• .~.+r r IAr rnnirvrarr /.r=r. r. /nvr o r.m..m, rr....~.._._.._ N:,.r , r....- • rmrnr ,_r.,....... r ..._.. nu rm m.. r r ... dr.. r.r . n. __. .ra.. ~w.rr.. r .. A ra.n. Plr n, wrrn. ;n~, m :.:,.l..nr.r.n.. M IY r. . of Arcltr.nl ~ 4 ~• rt .+ J I.,.- -__.- .__ rr_.., __-. _ r ttiA4G/y ~T ,r.Y Lr r A- YL7 $L , . _ _ _ r IAn h v buedmp perms wAe. properly IJbd oW, nvned ~+d .oLdaled, one n m6pa1 to ''~ '[1, fv ~~[AI ,Y urywlmn d vary IFrreundn n nol rommrn<ed nr n rmPendrd or pLOndond for IpJ OoYI. • INSPECTION RECORD . ~ y rouNOenoN. Ier. e.Nd. camp. rem. seno<Yr, Iwm, u;rd. sN.l, Ercawlwn. INSPECTION NOTES aooR swpsrs., clroERS~ Mon, vaa. mrr;er, RIYR., Spam, Amu, Vmh, ie. Lmb. MASONIIY: biol., Mo[rar Jb., Grem likf. ClwmOuh, Bulb. ROOF SMG Nviliip, Oivpn. BI«kinq, Mnhrivl Grade vnd TMdnas, Reel Drmm. 4i f ln R l n & rg, advg, RAMING" Wa „ e t, h., BI« Nailing, By<Hvq, DiapFr. Drop Srop. INBUtATION. ibdnm, R.VelaeF, Pipup, Sound Caulkirp. fIREWAILt: Mm.rial, Thihnwt Dampen, Ow::, Clown, iwible Nn6. ___,_ -__-_____ _____-_ INfFR10R. IAiNID1Y WAl6 Nviling, Supporn, lap. Idm Rdnl ._. __-..._..____._ ._ ..._.._._- ERTERIOR UMISIDINf. Ma+F, FaPmen, lop; Paper, Thldnm. Boding. FINAL INSPFCiION FmuM1 Grading Cerpl, Slope Plant Enerm Cemnl Cmd Pnar.d vfn Arc•v fiu Donn, Fuu, t«Ymg Ue.mn, lavdn0f, Nows Elumbe~., Weolner Str~ppina. PI.I Fngr I / L ~, / ~ ~ / ~ , 4 I ~j~" ~'y~~-_-~~ y , T - - -- .. ------ / ~G C~~ C >U~.- yy- y_/. .._. . - F// jib /~L~ S/ ~(~ ibIw1TINV IVVLI JfA __ ___,_... E%CAV, A[INF, ;.fibACKS~ Podru<Sd., Bvndmg, ~ ____ __ ____ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ ____ ExP +Pil 4arnp lm., $u[[Fage Spx Idml, y r~ ~ -~ ~ ~ -,. _...... L__ ____ .. . FENrf ~GAIFS ne M, C'v~~..r, An v.r~b ry ._ _ .. lmrnm. S~oro ayq ~ ~ __ .. :INA: :`SPE::'CFJ .w. .~.r I - _ ._ MISCELiANEOUS ~' sfen. rd...t wt, ,, __ _ ...... .. ._ -a- .____. ' ,a ..,. :. n.l .. - r t .. .__ ... ,. ! ~'' ' 1 ' I _. .. I -. I I t.. , . - ._ -_ _.__...L___ .__ ___. __.__...___ ._.__~__- -_ _ .. ._____.--.- W O W W Z O V V ^C` W ,~e< \V ^Q, TW V BUILDING AND SAFETY ~SION city of rancho Cucamonga 03pf1 nf.cnline Ranrhn Cummona0. Ca. 91730 Tel. 1714 9891851 r BUILDING PERMIT Zr __Xl.. ~ - Adar. i 9 srM__ ce„rl. _.._ c n.P _ __ br el t ima _ Ott. ~ He ow ^m v<rmn ~ per, Rr. 0 7I h Re Un d I d U d ~. _ I . e n VUne lao __ M_ _ O 6xn.l -' Ne. for Srae ARN f~t/i~" ~~___~ _____ _ Morlln9 wdroomt $rea_ ._. _ ~+ _ _ _._ gpPra+N ~ ApProved~ Y~ ~~.1LI APprovea r ~ ~~ _ Addreu Ala _ _ En9 pn:..r_ E~~. fi_ 6ut. Flan D_v. ~y corrd~r~orrr J [Mlrp<r o ~ / J~ 7 ~~ l // _.. _ _ _ ~ .. .. Ciry .~.. 2q, ~/ i~ < li J 1 ~ fel v~ ,~ 5« AIUAIION S _ 1_ . . _ Store 6< •~ i vryN LL~~. A/ o l ~ VUN CHKI< .' _ __ _ fi 6 ffpur . ._ - I ~ _ ~ _ _ _ _ ~y~.~ ._.__.-.-_ °-°'°""-- - -. __ _ r ~~Q"WQF7K DD~NE IN 1<C Aaar<u F LAST 180 DAYS pulNACe -~'~ - ~ I E _ .._____ Perrrrft tfiolder Notifled ` ' ~ ._ ~zrp Irel< op _ - _ ~ ~ svsre rns 1,< Ne _ v;opwM ~ c,......' ~ _ _ _ .. _ E 5 _ _ c 9fnuTlix~'+1}'-~a-~i-=~~. ,02te ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ __ r _ __ Oi NER ~ _ _ __ a o __ .,,,ea/; ' kl ~ f•c Fmr iOiALi111 g }' ~ Ea. fl. _. ~ NP ^- ~ B ad J . I \ L ( Sr:e _ b< e; "'t e veMq- 1 -. .nr~o. Dm< p r lw New bj Add "1 Aber, ~~ aepe~~ ~ oeroplwoe [] ~ ' ~~ I.I r'X:.4LD ft1NTRAfTUR P Iri.r'I \'t\TXrll IIXM1Nrv :r1Ni' i'FI AtrrfX 1 M nM1r erl.rm IaM r <\^li'Vln( AX e ~ sf~en v a 'I O el n ie' M ~ Pv ~o ' npr Ne<~.( is<r <[W. Yrr '~r ^^"Yr^•" i.~n Inrure r, nr n <art~liN " I r fNe n..n mr i.a.. nnu Im i nA.'In o1 IM u '. n 1 W • lull inrrv • Ilx\ ~ilrm vin. r,yr -- rr O +• A rNNXRP~'IN\r:x l;ur .Ak^TVr'r O Mrt^Ire]rarr O: it rl I ~ ~n U ln~v \ IurnirA ~ ^ 'rv r 1 • <Ilrmr N4 I vt 1 y M r r xMl<• f rr v M P e~ A N f l F T ( Mwr• .n vr <N~In. r.vr I i W, y ~ u ~ [nNPf.NCn1 i~~ 1\nUMNfX N'URA8r l5 n rr.e o ~ n ly rr r m~NnAn f ~ Nlr e ~ rw ~rN n nr A°\iN e .. rr.rrnn +•N wr r nrv41N r u la+ r.r erl~M IWUrr rrf00r rr~rp v A r I ~ i n rJ Y rr I r (~ ~ er N k for < ~re ww r Irrl. r m A M / !'rL. n '~a r ^. r nrr er b e 1rxt M I._.Ir r v • ~ r..n,ru nnr _n.. r;.n. rrr e.rr ~lr n.Tr1AW. m nrN~n.r re • v e •r I ~I'~( `I~n/4. .rrlwrr/ t r a••;X l l • r V r evn I rX. r rnA rr l rM ta ~ nr N ~~ wrw n~s~ A M r C N nll . rt er r i "rrt ..rlr irA - r rr nrr Ju 1 A n 'R ~ 1 MI U(TIA1 1 GN r NI 1~ M W vNorwn`. . LJ II b Nr r tn. e... or eA rX rA • p rm r wm o. L rAr rMr. m•Mre rrY neo Mr r r nm mild nr rnv ml n~ rArrn~ r^I +Ir„ Innrln r Nemr 1 ej I P ' ri+rnrrr AA.Ir _ u r rr err n . rnrnr N ~rr A nn + u Jru . . r r A nrr . r. •.r tv me( rn r/.r r l~wra r li..nrv lnr.~ v r 41M , nr 1 e ' prr i.rern M 9 A f r n. ~ r v rrrmnr anrl . r fnr 0. n u~_ rrnnM nmprrtr ~~ O rr -- Nirneror nl .\onrirenr _... _. .. - r ~-~ NriliM .1Arl..x n .... _u i r. flub f ~_.. ~- iAlr r o buIGnp p ma .Fan wepvey LnA o ogn•d Prrd mlldoled, and n wblml to fh! !;(!f ' opi•nl,Pn rl xvl Ferro.der n ror vo mm<.d m n ;mp•rded or obr~domd tar 19p dpP~ rl '~ • INSPECTION RECORD FOONEIATION' IG•. Cend Comp, 1mh. ierba<b, fomn, RemL 4eel, E+maolmn ftOOR SLAlUSiS.. GIAOEAS MesM1, Vap Ee.no Nb.~ Spen+. Acavv, Venn. Fr kmor MASONRY kel^L, Mormr ln., Gaor rAR, CIwTOeh, Palrv, ` ROOf SHiG Neiling, 0•apM1 BI«6^g, Mayer I crea^ a^a ilrzkne vaer ore~~, FRNAINE wally. Rd•., Inr.. BI«Fn9, eraunp. ! Np~lleg, 6adm9. E~aOFr Orclr Rnp, -- II INSUUTION FM1~: -a. R Vnlun. P'C'^g. Saud r Caulking. FIREWALLS~ Merenol, iF,:kneu anmpnt. Jmn, Clown, fo.. b'+ Ln r r WALL Nei ^g, Sappy R, iH1EAl0R~, kAtN'GRV lapv, lomr Fmnl ..-_. 1 ____ E%LERIp4 lA1M SIJI:~G Me,F, Fotr f kopf, Peper, lbrknnr, Baabng fINAI 'r:5Pff110R'f^"P Gmn.g Ce ', SOpe • f~,e oe^,. 1, ,. .. k.^e t..,.: -a~gr. PI Ifnar Hena n.-ecr .., .~ sl pp^p. ~ u< _ ~ _ _ SWIMMING YVVL/)Yq I fJ(:AV E.N• J'ar ~ ~~,g. 'I f.p', .. V MISCELLANEOUS • k INSPECTION NOTES y-~ ~~-f2EF! c~ ~~~ _ _~-- _ _ A c~..._ r t av-N ~ __~. UILDING .AND SAFETY •,ION .I ELEC./MECH./PLMBG. B city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 14) 989-18 ,.. Cucamon o, Ca. 91730 • Tel. 17 <on,m<,<~'. IoemN~oq _, h dm o n c 9340 BosellDe, Ra NO p<r<, Pxa• IA nml_ cc / '"'~ Bundr"y ~%C ~P ~ % ~ i /,C err- - -- 5-.raP -_ 1 __ Z A9dress Trao LOI Blup -- ~ Omr '~`~ ~ b lr9"'v 5 Msl Neo m< ^ ~~j} r~j ,j' ~ __, __ W Np _ - '~'~O+o~TiYrZSRK DONE IN LAST 1801 A'iS amn9 Aamxss ~ ~~r ip1 ' rc h ~ Ire c~ 7 o(~t}ffed_~~ "~FiKN-l i-1 ~ cev ! < ; Co a''' s9 r o r+.w .,,~ y~+ ~~a r'1 ~ 9 7 _ ~ ~ O _ gl .~/=: r. l%?~:J Pnia~~''ot ehgr ~I. = -- ' A Grew /J ./~. _~ ~ TxI. < ~ Sa. h Neo v<w (_ C__ __- P<, A<ttuarY Brtl9 1 9 (~ -'v4 Gr ~~ ' i ! _ Plug CLY I Iswa, a fee 7 v . / r . L W ~kl '' cnY 7 _ ~A~7 v« _._ ._....__ W TRICAL FEES 'rc rvo J~ score L* ~n - TOTAL ELEC f J 6 fa•u, l - - - -- u No D{i<IIPPOo n t' VTPnRPRx PfF1.A0.ATIrrN r.r Y I. r 'T^ P No pPi[I'Pr~Prr 1 amPr I Boiler/ ~ W ~ ' <r n1 m. O.r M. r I rx. P•nnr... • nr f o P m 1'^!°°e. rm :i~ ( tiud 4RI ro 6 m o b In lad 3 MP ` ...- l~~a.ii. rha' 4 B . <om r ~ .P ,xnrn xnuAn' ~ ~ „P _ o t ~ __ 11W M]<BU ro s ; r. I I eV<• . . .. ~,. r....r. L. L, ,nr r r~... ,r...~x, , ^ r m r e HO I ,Ir win s.:P r~<~xd la o00 ~ ....., N. .,_..,x .........~, -, " _.......,_r ~~. .r....r .r w r ., ......r ... r....,..,. ...r .m ~ ' N<~r<„ it .1 ! A, r+o~dru U ... ..w r. .<..rn .... ..,. 1 ~ - ,~„ - fro and e ... .~ lJ ~ „I p OIFe Z /1 r A r x. .... Vl ~ i t L un sr o-I P~nn G Y. -e Fe< __ _.___ _ F« ~ TOTAL MECHANICAL FEES __ 5 _ ~ I D .m o^ r. Oe,o'p o r 5 L ~ N ~n r..,, ' r G I Wrrr Or < I n ~ I f ~`-~ - I `" " ~ ., ~ <, _ ~} ~ ~ .r cap .V ... ~~ , ~ ~1 :., n. ~ .veMr. .~. r I , . ~ ~'' ~ ~ ~ d r., TOi AI PLUMBING FEES C r y v m TOTAL ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES / ~D - z:,<• '~ ~ ~ r. '~ ~ Pn<tl und ,IY I led aa I, I e ...h. ....... o ` ~ < o n<d lo. IM dop ,y~ <.d d .,BOOeo o r.a~~r m n r~. .,~ . , o ,.o 0 0 . LNS.ECSION sECa+ I `s.ECro. Nbres UNDERGROUND CONDUIT NEW SERVICE FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. _ _ TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER _ _ y~ OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CIRNCE. cj A" e 7 ~9~.k 1'.ta~r .~.. 1 _' _.' _. _ . .. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES ~ - ____ - _ __ _ - ._ opm, c°mn. Ai,, MECH RO . . Suppap, Vmb _ ____ __ _ ____ ~ ~ - __ ._. _....... . fAU/AC Unii ~ FINAL MECH. V„y S~apN~ ~ ~ ~ ._. „THER _ _ _ OTHER .. ._ _. x'I. w°i.~, /UNDER FIR U G . . . G°~. e°ppay wmea, ca, v."o. PLMBG ' RO . . Supperl~~ flolArny~ I _. SEWER PRIV DIS^v SVST Efd~ DIAG 4AM GAS TEST FINAL PLMBfi, f'"'""'' v°wO' v`"'' °e1v"' WATER HTR I . _ Rms. Ael Vabe 3 _ __ ~ L SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM ~ a -. _. i OTHER __ _ _ __ f GTHER i GAS UiiLITV CLRNCE. ~„ 80"JDING r li ' G~5 PIPING m°r.~~°i, ::•, ~e I ' 1 r GAS TFST I HEALER " - r' `' ~a~ Smn nll I riNAl Pool ELEr. I F'IpJAI POOL PI,,V18G i I OTFIER ~ INSrECTIG~ DATf INSP. SIGN. W 1~ O `Jj Z O V v ^C` .EW.r l Q N BUILDING AND SAFETY ~SION city of rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline, Rnncho Cucomongn, C.+ 91730 • Td 17141 9p9.IR51 iArr n o budding perm8 . n properly Idtrd o nprrer and .ohdn r.d, and n wbinl to I ~ I, ~' j 1' ~~ry mP%r Olmn rl +ar1 r .gynd•r n ^PI ro m.vnd ar n mrpend<d m rbondomtl for 180 doyr ~ BUILDING PERMIT r ~y i i d r~° ;' w ll Nn. Trp< a<. : , i% /i ed r d a, Awrm r Coml Group lor Block imn No. _ __ __ _____ _ . ~ Jc< load_ No. D. Ilse Permit Do, k.v. O.rb Ae aurred ~ Pepuired CMner ~~i'! > / [/) ~ _ Ne. 9ne ~ ~ ~ APN &tlroar m Sae j _ ---..____ Morlin9 ~/~~ iT~ ~ Aed ~ ~ ~ _ _ APProved APProved Li,ti. T> Approved L ~ T rn, ~ i ~ __- __ Plon Div Fme Dm. ny(D,vL C~L a _ Ciry Zrp~ rel. r, _ r ~-oi-r a~ .,- ... So.aal / cwa~r~en ~ cwrrrarmr .__ ...r ~~ {~bCi-G.SG.__... .. Addre„ <rry Lp rel. WAiIGN t ~ 0'~ Ame Dr. Gry 6 Claud_ _ be No. PIAN CMKR _ ArtF., Enpr., Dnrpner ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ PERMIT /~ F/ _ G ~ E I ry ]mp ~sm• oc r c ~ s1nEM0 E _ __ Prepo,<a . .. .. . i. ..~ S pfumi i . PARK _ _ I ^.pER L ' rrc r,rr ~p. nen o - sP, ir, ~ ~ ^ A TOTA sra I . ~~ s~ , _ _ i ~o, ~< r D~I< nen j_i A.r- p.P<r f _,.,o. ~ y - ~.. ~ e ~_ NAV nP~rii rTlrrlr I r~U rI r M n , ~ ~ ^ 'nNfYNFATION IrI.fr.IRAt1nN rn .. r- r. r In nrP nlr~ . oN u m rn r .,r , m. brrnnr~~~~ne ~~l'ml~,nv l o< tM ~ ~ ~ ~ ' w ~Y r~..r •~„um In,vr. r.r, nr . .rniliM yr rMrrrr i,4,. pA 11 •nv in fall !~ r .n .(Iwt rnn , N, Ni'~N NI'I I.IrfR lr ` I~r'µ `r ~ `~ rtNirtl rM rl:: t~ Irrrrnv NrpneiNM O f f O ` . v r.. 1. ,rV'r` ~rd n I'.nrr.n v r r ' l ~ r~~ a. ~ r x f MPTIIfVa fP(IX tMf filt PGr MPRNt.IInN ,IrRAMfR / .r.n e I~Y r.. ...ri... ,.. ..r r...ane.r rM w ruler ev A•J.N lMYrr nlWi ~ ^ ! t, ~ ~ v,. w ... .,.r..rr, mr,. . ___ _ ..... .....w c ~C a.° ~ " ~ ~ra rnx rtrnn Rnnren e mr rn~r r~. rmr .... ~. mr m ^ u" p , . m . P rr rn. .r,n a..n. .n rmrr ...„...r s...«+. a.i rw i i• nnr n ,AiG ror ~.iu nr rnp or rer rN I+ w~ n yr r rM nv.Jrn Y 'a I..n..r, X, n. ~~ it. l ~nY I. q O x....e lin.l,r. A..1....__ __ _ ^ r ~. r r • _ __ ____ nl~ .. ..en n.b.rrrr i..n.., ...n, ~~ 1.. r nwl e.ro. r I.rr.vr Inv i rr ,nil F ~ I •n..vmr.r rrn.u. ,.. __ R .1` ~ r. fr r.,Yrn O irr ur rnrr r M~ FIer in, r. nn o Y wN~M.</ ^Y wI~ c.rnnrurr n! FDObr IMre~.~.~~ ..Prv ------- FOUNpATlO& Ier. C.r!If. Como Te,h seMo,b. Fapp., Rdrrr, sMd, E.w.eean ftOOR TIRE/ISTS.. GIRpE45 MarF, Vap. Bcumr. Elb.. spoor, r4co,, vmh, ir. Imbr. MARONRP Rn.l„ Morten Ih., Goy! L(h, CwmOUM1. Bolh, ROOF SHTG NaJ.nq, pmnb BixY'~+q, Me'eno'~ Grade and rF~ 'm r. Rooi p•am, fRAMING WoIN Polt, ln,, Ela,mn 9mnng ~ NorLng, Bva4~~~, OmpFr C !r 5!apr. q Irylj - INSUUTION '-;1nnr. Rvc:on R.p~eg, <e,nd i Caulbng. FIRFWAl6 M e~ol Th..Vne„ :anperr, pmr Clneo, Fmrble l,hr INTEPIOA LAlH'C4~' WAI, rv Sooporn, ~~ la~ Lap,. m... Ran. IwswewMl - -- F%rEA'~OA :Att.yow e,h .me ~~ . G IoPer, TFrµnnr 3od~-q - - --.. _ pIN4 rP.nFC*',ON ~„n Ora, .n ~ p~ ~ .~t: n-i, ..~ ~ .~.y,., w.. , s r r... ~ r . SWIMMING POGI/SPA F%U: .. .Ir ... r ... i b ~.... ..~. ....r'..i E.. n . :.. INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTION NOTES ~. ~<<, is lye, p~r.9Cy N~„i~~Q. ,~. ~~ V4 Y~ MISCEIlANE0U5 ' ' I ~ gUitDING ~~I1ILDING AND SAFETY~SION • ; ci~ry of <rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9891851 o[[. _ Roncho Cocomon o, Co. 91730 • Tel. (7141 Ho. rvp< cwP 9320 Baseline, / IgmG / ~,,.,_ / ~, comr ~ --- or t.+. err;miep 9 8S0 / 9 ~4 ST_ _._ ~-TNo o.. f° _ u_ oppn.d __~ Aadr<n Oco _ tep~ued- _ Z lot ~~~-~- No. 'T~Ie 0r a L_ Na. - ~iLOFMr£.JT e<er_+ __ _. s°<_ ~ rnpprwN W o.e.r F'REDQ74<S __ PCU PPPIOV<d EvP'or.. LFrr~ oin. p rn°aln. - DfC 5~/~~ ~ rla°_o~._'~l~!. _ L_ -((~~c/ 7 f _ Addr /.O B il. JP. PC'i SPec°I ~~ ~ ~.Q_-~O ° az I~YJ Y co,dNro.f Addrn ~ _ n' ~ ~=C r<I. vnwnnorv s l ~ C J __'_.. a.=_ 38 7 pry ~~ ( P1AH CHKN 51<Ie Lc. lrz, No, ~_-.~ r -- 6 GI- _ _ -- ~ PEAMIr mnl. - LJrJ _ - _ ___ _ _.._. _ _ ._-- M[A.. EnOr. _ .. ompr,o___ _ _. ~ rd F oaAlrvncE Q Aea ~, .. -- E - _ . ___ _ ~ ~. E r~rEMS .. Ln !ia rm. _- ._. _. _.i. --_ _ I ~ $I nFAU'IE. 4 _ ____~ Prov<i<a- ~A~~rE ~Lp6• I _ .[Ire, /yJA/T K` .. - PApN., ~ ~ - Y.oa,l. s.,rf.;i Ece rmf TOTAL Z sp. Pr , y~p _r / I _° c" ° , y , o<e°< r I i l -Lr~' a G y frl'PPAN9hTIfIN (^~F11.1NATIII M1^ure n Pt' u<,v ~.i Add, L '~ nl°°. •. • ..r r wr r f..r.r.m u~, Irwn'••. nr . n.r~n IICP.I: Yf:n f(IYTPM1rtpPi Nil'I,.Rf}I~<r<. r .nr ^ 'r, rrr ,!r^ vh"` r' • nvnr Nn rrPrm N•r rm li..nvtl unL. omvrnenr '1'uf.ran. fnl~nn0 mr n r. i, rvll 1<.n .« tlfef -- ~- -- 1'r I .vnp., C,.[rl,buroAA 1 Mrrl~ ,NOr of [~.a<re< < nt W Burin.v .nn 1~• I?r rA ^,IJ Ynrmn C.., .. ..._ ~ .un v~ ,u w,v . . .. Irrcn~ ~ P. TIFIf fT P. p FFFNPt10N ~' OY rrPWBI'l1.IrP,R eFF'..H^flrrY Il f n<NfeW r"~' ~fA _ Tr .r.n, ,. vr0.llfxN'Pr.rNPf.YiATII^N IY. Y'heNf~~• r^I 6A .I(rrm rA.rv enMVa r^ v'dn•m MrIJr Ifn •r WykrNr(omr orl4Cme ,enr AIehAJ xnlrr r~H O •ulnrt rM ~ rw raft rlr Prm f~'Nln~n • ~ < 1 P~ , °~v~ fM Ir~r . r ~~r i,ut nn rl.,r n~ r r ~I~'IVr~H .rril.P fPVl.lrin Tll~nlN ~,tr~o rAUi Hil~nir ei ~A. M~N~Wd~rOVe V ~~r'~M• n.~~in ,me.r n err .nr _n.. rAn. r..r r,..1r1 rv nv.r rn.lr rrA ~ A ra'A o.veuwr uNf.NfMrr N r n ~- //\\ I RPI, t 5 ~ 1 ~ rN O lam/ ~ 1 IV ~ ~ .r r.. nh~ h ~ ~<C, v%.~rn Arm. ~e^Y'r,, r uJI m m m. ~ln, . ;v mn nl•d.~ rmWrrN.. rl meN...M ru -- -M_ r _ 4e mN.l 6, W ©~'r ,.( thv r r P.n ~ Yv Nv~Crm.Nir. C 'rNrrr r ~~~''7Mr r..M r.ru. nr A .ur ...ur n, M .eF,.. G~+< "'^:rA r. ..,r .. u, r.,r~. r, . I .... ., ,~r/ ~ ~.r..e.r. r, mf. A'y~rr:,~~r_ `V n r.mrt unAV ,w ~~. <%rA ~~~~ .Mr. r^~~'~POl r.n~f~'•~ a O_' m~ ~~- - -- ~ - ,~/ - .~~" fur. er.a, PrP_---~- to -Q L. ~~.~~/ -_ _ c <^ <ul ~pn<d mtl mlra°/rd, and r wblero LM1%, it p buJAnp p<rmrl when Mep<r1Y iAleda a mpend<d ° b°nJan<d Im IBO d Yr <.O 'rPeon rl w°ri IA<r<under ~f <I ~ r r I.!)ll. '~ ~ . INSPECTION RECORD ~ fOUNDAiION~ Gr. Cabl Como Ton+, Betbad+, I ... "'I For Rnvl Leek F.e I Q\ B BOOR SLAB/1515., GIADEIS;oMpM1, Vnp, 5arriee, ' BI49„ Span. ,kcm. Vmh. it lmbr 14T f MASONRR Rmnl, Morbr 1M1 Grour L05, <Imn.Ouh, Bolh ROOF SRTG tJe.l;ng Dmpb Blohmq, Mab~ol Grade vad *F~~'~e<s avcl Drmm h iRAMING Wo'rvr. RoO,. Ars., 91a4,n9. Broa.ng. Nodmg, Back~nc O;apM D~otl 9ap+ INSOIATION '~ 1 en n, RVOIun v,p,ny, Soun9 <nulbng. piREWAIIE Maenol. 4rt4+es cmpttr. Dann, ~Iwen, Ponble ;m4r INiERIOR~ IQX: ORV WAiI Nod•ng, Seppor4. \opr. corm Aerol FMAERIOA lA9r'cICIbG Mef l,, role n w Paper, .M1¢Fres+ Bob nq, tq' FINAk I. rvECrlO•t [ on-v Cr•rl~ Rae .~~; uen n ~ ~ t eb.r ~..~ r' naE qr 1 ~~ _ SWIMMING YVUU SYA E8[AV k"rr Q'BK;K+ v;d:.:; 41 W;nn ng.~ FFr.:F ,AI i rr .r r , rN.,, rr. ~ .o MISf.ELLA NEOUS 51.:.. R . . ~~ INSPECTION NOTES { .. -i p _ [,.Gyt-/ t,a / 7L/ ea<Fiee? 5779FA ' 811,ILDING AND SAFETY ION city Of•'rar~cho~cucamonga ~ ELEL./MECH./PIMBG. 9321) Baseline, Roncho Cocamonaa. Ca. 91730 • Tel. 0 1 11 989-1 85 1 PERMIT e~,la~.v e, BSO / J ~ ST 3LD6 ~ Na. I o..o~m'o~ IAee~,~o,,,, com,.,.,~„1, e,.l„~,~or, ree _ - Adme„ seg..<e, Z o.,., F.eEn.el c,~S ~.t ~oQ.~'1E~T ~ J Is~~e /C r! ~/JJ/'' 1 (() ©• Addreu / ' ~~ ,~~CLLJ ~'/t ~/3 ~ ~ / IR.rcP,a<I<, LSM1h, SwilrM1n; e~rys~/TA /yrv/k .RAP y2702 rel. C~/S~YRi'irj > ~.r~.,~.e, ~~SU _ ( ~ w Mo,u,i ~ cem,e~,o, FRESzICL-s ~.~~ ~- r 'NR r 1 I __ opMea Q i ane, Add,e:~ V i-Pet'ilY I J Gry ~ Zq lel. ~ P.cdmual BId9. (a~ L.: SP rl A,eoNrw W S,a,e Lc ~ Gry J Rea Aamsory Bley fn 6 Classd. ha. No. W I I PIP. 6r . I« ire ~ r 1Q I.IrEN[r!~ f11NTC.,R~k ti 1, Yf I.,P F+ W ~ .ir'.m "i ~ .n. x,..,.. ,,n nm.-.e. ~ n. ,.. m, TOTAL [LECTRICAL FEES Q x..,. ,. ~., mii .,~.rw, ~ No ,.~.t, ^saM1n^,or ~ N. '~, "o ,,.~onoe f r W Iw,ooo an ~ x 1~~9 nr P ~ nT ~ f In fAU or r ~ i d .. ,..~ ..... ..... ..... ~.. NI .m ooa aru I i R.>1s ~,r V s.r~ ~ Z 0 .,..., .._ .. , ~..,. Z ~, ,~.I noon 1 h. i o..e, Q sr. U n„ r.l ,.. r., _~ f Toinl cFlANlcnl EEEs ME r n.. I ~., .. r. ,I, " I I 1 / ~ ,'~~~ ~F eL1.Ge>rT- uW~i ., w I ~ N' 1 ~ s ~~ M „. -~• L7 .. ..:..,, Z ..., ... .,. ,. ~ _, - , -' ,~, . _ m .,.,, ., I I o u ..., r.~ ._. ... ~ ..,I,.,. A,'n I I ~ .Orn' PLUMB;IiG FELS i ,.. n b ~ - `' ' ' E ~- Jf~~,. TOTAL ELEC., MECH., 'LMBG. FEES ~,.2 C ~.-•---- ~ . 1 ... s n .. r,,, e ~ I s~rr ~ .. ~.~ '~(J1~n.h Yi3 e, r„~~~~~ I .., m.r I~~~a~,o1: ; h N~ .. ,,,~r,~~, ..I,~~ .1.r _,, ,,, .a INSPECTION RECD `SPECTOR NOTES - "- UNDERGROUND CONDUIT - -- - J._____-_ -. ... - - ROUGH WIRING _.--... - _ _ `r 26 NEW SERVICE FIXTURES ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ FINAL E!EC. INSP. ~~.,.r7 ~?+?~_,_. _ __ TEMP, POWE" POLE OTHER --~ _-- - OTHER ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. I U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. ONES ~ _ .~~n,-c.mn. A.,, r -- - ~ -~- - RO. MECH. sopp~ry, v.mr iAUi A< Unll FINAL MECH. vr,y, sn.mm OTHER ~~- ~~- OTHER ~ U.G./UNDER FLR. Sod. Wom., ' Gm, Suppa.k _ Svpoc ~r PmM1~~m GAS TEST FINAL PIMeG. i_',°~"~ °'~°" ~ ~, WATER HTR. ~~'v`5"' SEWER/PRIN. DIS':' SYSTEM1I OTHER OTHER ^--~-~ ~15 UT!LITV CLRNCE, 60LDI M1IG iir mr.ininr cn5 ,. r'.ni °nrn =,;~ '. !rdnl r: ri t", hl iiG rnt, R _ _ 'f IS!!~ I':ON DALE !, INSP. SIGfJ. SEWER/PP.IV DISP, SYSTEM DIAGRAM :, BUILDING AND SAFETY •SION • BUILDING city of rancho Cucamonga PERMIT 9320 Baseline, Rancho Cvmmona_a, Ca. 91730 • Tel. 17 7 41 989-1851 Z Bulldin° Aan_~BSD~~ .nlY 13Lp6 Z~_ Epl ale<R (ma No. Trp< Qr. s.„ _[_ ~I <.^,r ~ _ c.a,p ~- orr" ~-N-. ox u vamp C.. oe. ,: . ~ . . ~ L t d I I Na. _-_ ._.___ .r _ L ~._ _ _ R.p.xea a.p.n.a -.-- LJJ C 0.n 1 " F~ EY~aYC,F~_ l~ec(e%o..P ~./-'- - - N¢ 1o15¢e MN B<d,_ t,,. ~ L ~f/3 P IMw"al;:"° Fo. ~o X _ - Avpr...a apv,...a npnla.a vl^^ c~.. g'~i E o.. L.. o~n. _ _ Gry z.p T I. ~%Y~C7 Ss~Tw /~~ z7o r- /I[) BYf27~p - _ __ 5pnivl _ - - cx^d,Xp^, ~~!~ 3 ' ~n7 ~'~= ' . O = cenv«I.I ~,2Ef7R-icfJ /~ve%p. . - - - ~ J Adal", W cn np -.. - _ --._ -.__-__ rd. __._. _____ _ _ vA:unnoN t Q (~ \ y Slole Lc / - 6 Clmvl. Lc Nv. RLAN CREC. W _ _ Ncb.. En°r n"~gnel PERMIT Sa_ SQ eddr7~~ _.. ._ . .. .. . . ......_~(II F Q , oRAVUCE -<h ~~ ien Srmr ~ _ _ E ~ _. _ . l Ix N^ SVA(NS E _ ___ _ _ _ Pmpmle - - - ME r~r .l /..n,/! l1•/n /r/O A.._ BFAliiif. _ -S'*trkA_ c~ ~A /if;rri+9.£..fi_ AIAn_lA_ 6E12~ ~ PACK _--- - Z _ olvE sp. r• r.r R^ c. o - n. pryl „ea ,~ ~, v. ~ 70TALI . , B - ~, ~ ~1 D^I Nex - A,n - Ire, -~ i ' e' ep.,r_I ~.:, I~-. e ~ ~ / !r LV'PNPRry t'n,YTRAI'ION,, MrI .PAi Liw u.~ 1 .m w.r..l ...e.. o...,..,,.. ,.r r~ox, ,. -,n,r,.., rl vPnTl x Ra iw.r. .x I n....r, ,u~,n .n.r i .... ,..r or. n- ~ r " ~ ^ L C ~.lu Gr;. -owi ixenx x i+ In^ Irne .. rlr.il nl IM Burnrv nn.l Irnlrv~nn+ i.-1. nn~l r AI ~ , .~~= .rr, m. s.. ,.oo. '•~ nn Inrvnnn o m( 1 ~ ..---_. f... .mn.ns M\P0.PIIII,Ii FP ry %+, m.ol Imm: i~M fnnr l ..Inwi, m I~.ex +n. l Lr l ~ l n /iiN rilxtl rM .irr breA. M1rrnrvi.lM O O ` O w ^ a u.. i r 'r +rr .t . ~ 'ri.u.~rl .I In. n'IArr "' W .W, n P P x~iNh flPgf ~(~XPFNVATItPr IINiVRAN^Y.r • x-x+ nn r r anp.l 1 r V r I r.nw n U• rrrn nr.x rn. n+xri.+ ni c- r~-. ^ca ~.~ nr +.r .rr:~-...r r-. + v .. .--~. P` rr 4 •(nre r! mrn n pere•i ~ r bBM1emmr wnn+l ord. . n i n ni '~ o W. r~x.. I n nr.i rmi.u •nr n-.. I,a i. 1.n1.rA 1dLn I•r~' n ~ l r l rn Vr IP lIn nn..nP IA r nl lmr. I Frrxorw ~An~1 ' l ~ : .. +.-...+ +.a+ n. n. .. r ...+ w. Trr- mm~nr ~ r~M rn~ 'n. ~ .rr n I r ~ ~ P n . ~.-rr. r.... r+r . r n r.. ... ~+ . ~•n+ .. nn +.x +. . . +nr n n.• .nx I, r +rr~r r. rVryi}PINTIVN I. Y.NIIIXf. ALP.XI 1' +Mx cfA V/ rwW+vrr. ~ n r •a ,nt ,. .i..nl nr.u n. ~lnrn ~r In. rw. r•.r^~ + . ~ ~Ar ~.vN.n Pu. r xwl in ymrr ~ N+ ~X gyn. x.,rY IIM1•m InlAmrrnx ,r ~ 4. I"i "rfomunrr inn^.r r .._ __ _ r ryrme u. W y Y .,...... nnl,n..__ n M n P ® r +r m r l ~ .x,... - .rar.,m n +~ _. r..-... ~,. ,., ..,I+,..r . r...... I .,.~ A n . Mp .. mnl'4rn ^ ~ ~ r + l r ~1a~ ~ v .m rr.nrr .r... al r Y .__ ^Prrv1 ~ I~^6 ` ~+ i nI~A ~RIIrNnt~ ~0.11 n r TW y (~ p,/ y ti ~-- .. rro (Ail u p bmldmp p.rm~ vA1+ n only Irlbd ouL np^Id ~~l rvLdvled. vnd n •vbllal to i 1 2 r~l,Y Irp'•OIi On d +o.l IA•r•undn .f nal nmmencnd a• n ,vlppnded or vLOndoned lal la0 dntl, :,` ' • _ ,. . INSPECTION RECORD • ; fouaonnoN, Icr. <wol. came. i.ar, s.wp.lr, I ~ INSPECTION NOTE$ iwmr, tdnl. Shvl, E.mmrl9n ~ ~ flOOt SUB/JSiS, GIRO'.AB. MmA, Vve Bdrlgr, aER.. swp., :karr. v.pn. ir. lmnr, 1 x~ pS x'y~,~ ,_,_ ~i~~iLG 3 f}LG~yJ ~JLJ ~ ~ _ MASONRY Peml., MwNr Jk. Groin liln, (J ~ ~T GJ'~ //Z G.J§f ClwmOun, Bvirv. ROOf SMiG Np~.l:ng, C'vpA Bb.F.p. Vmerivl I r, ~~ ~Ty1 y~ ~S ~~~.C.r ~~ ~~ / `~ c.pa. pie *n~~: r„ R,pl o,amr. 3 I~Z eS "~ui"-. ~ ACIA~L Q,l D !/U •~fl~'4~~ ~N Img. mcl~pa Rolppe,rr or h Srpvs. Brpp~.g, ~ ~ - -U ) , n f:cyrR.lG~ ~%~~~ INSULATION a :, R.va'ma, Rp,pg, SpueJ ._ -- -y __.. 6gYneu, Dampen, Dwn ` ^ir n, vibl. ra Cb cu ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ .._ -. - ....... .. . NtEPIOR Y WA:i Mdny, $upOmn, n CG ,ARe le +, lv a i. ~ .. - E%iFAIOA LAM tlfr\Cs Mu'^ 'vve^err, laar ______ __________________ -.-~-_^_••.•• ••• . upper. *Fi[:ne:t Bv.L~^G r - ..., r... ~.r.n a ,. .. ' 1WIMMIN4 YUUL/RYA .. _. _ _ E%CAV c c ,El9A:K' Rn~. it .' -. p v"' _. MISCELLANEOUS _. ._ __.~. .__a____-_._~ :.__ __. _ _. ,1jU1LDING AND SAFETY ION city of rancho cucamoi 9320 8asellne, Rancho Cummongo, Cc. 91730 • Tel. p14~ B~~Idlog r' Z Aee,.,. Y.S~ i9~~ sr g~D6 3t~ cW_ _._ W n,e ~„ FRED?/c,~S. ~H1%~in e N7` Aee,~,~ ~O. ~pX J`' ~~,3 ~ O een,e„ ~„E J Ci1Z Z.p ~iel. L sere bc. --- ~ <~ry 6^^Clmu/'L nrr: Lc' Na.-Sw~T -` ~Mrvn LIfr.Y55n fnryTanrtrlxl W , ,n. A,..~ ..... _,~... r~,..., m, Q -.. ~ ~, mn r~... ..n .n..,- .. 7 I O ..~ ~ ....F _,. ~~~ nn II IJJ n/4i. ~~ ~ ..,. u., .. .. ., ,. ., r iga ~ ELEf./MECH./PIMBG. >89.,35, PERMIT No Dovnq~.on IAde'Onns. Comm~m:i, IndmunB { Fee $oau, a !.,! ' o~,l,,, t W / iReup:ntla aglr: $wnah.rl CI .- ~ 3 F~vNres f _ ~ 401o r J Irv ea. I Q ~ o:Fw I$q.eey I Ra•demial Bldq (n sq it Mev Ne.. J Res A¢nso~y Bitlq (: W Rlcn CFi ~ Ivuorce fee ~ fee ~ TOTAL ELECT RICAI FEES ~ ~)'i < N Dn p. n , N I D pl on fea W u n L N C IOC 000 BFU ~• I x l. d J nr ~ I I 1 'uu o ~ B~ N w,wa 4 n nr [ I i ~~ x ~ . ~ I d cuoo d ~ B, A M do v I 000 do r = n l ! , o ,~. . sr. W ... TOTAL MEf l~IANICAL FEES n. n.~• p o~ r... ~, I j N I wn.~~ .~ ,n n, ~ y ~ I , B-~. « ~.. . Srrrem .+ ~~ r Z ....: ', t. ... ., ~ m~ 2 -~,w. .. _. I I J rl ^ „, F.. a lOiAi ~ UM81NG FEES I f ~ TOTAL ELEC., MECH., i MBG, FEESi ' 1 c. ~ f'~ ~~gk ~~y ~~e~e„e~~~ ~ISp.. ~- N~m.,y - s o: i^•s nv o.~ «.... .,~ .. ...... ~ wmn ... ,n .d tr. t8c J op _UNDERGROUND CONDUIT I ROUGH WIRING _ i -NEW SERVICE - _ 1 FIXTURES FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. PO`VER POSE OTHER - -~ OTHER ELEC. UtILITY CLRNCE. I U._G_. DUCTS~REfRIG LINES RO. MECH. ~"~~. `°'ne~ ~". ~ _ _ 5uepon; venb FINAL MECH. vewk u~„ I __ __.. v.~n, s'~mox, OTHER OTHER U.G.lUNDER FLR. s°'~' wa1p' _ oar. wpoon: ~ RO. PLMBG. s.ep=„~ v~~~e~•,„~ GAS TEST FINAL PLMBG, ~, `"`"` WATFR HTR. ~0` ~ e.~S'•.~.,.. SEWER: PRIN. DISV. SVSTEM t OTHER OTHER GAS U*IIITY ('~ RNCF. r ~y.~ ~'y..-. _-_ _ ._ , ~~W' ~.2.__ .. __ ._. i SEWED„PRIN. DISP. SVSTEM DIAGRAM ~ [ ~n:ou:G ~iin rnn:ni.ir vAi ri FIIJC, n.o-, ~ r, a' iL,r f,r „', i, i'rp, ~.IIC hdlM Pr:01 11 Mit( i lyl -..__ -. _ ___ II ~..PI~TIGi. DATF. ~ INSP. SIGN. `_/ U a ,~ a Tai V `BUiJING AND SAFETY ION ory of rancho Cucamonga tl'10 Baseline, Ranrho fummm~n, ('n 91730 • Tr.l I]ldl 9R9.1 RSI Wlldrn8 I No. lot iBb<Y ~ ~~ Oa. No. tuna o.n.r -'~ 11 ~ 1 r ~ - -- -- -- - - -- -- N,. Moiling Agar.>=--L~IIroo khq{~cw-fir-----~-~~ - Ch Z ~fiel Commerm J `~Y~ r Tl~ I J ..._..... _ _ ._ She. Aear<xi _ ci I n r.i. _~t.nvsc~n~__...~tZl~ ~3"zi~. sane Ert. oh naw.a. l{r Yr..l~._C''15 tCsal uP_NO, (y-J'1~S Addrm. ~ ~'~ Ir.l. _- -_ _ _ %'i3l ['.. ,_ ~'•KK"ts s1~i Si. .Yl,j--LIS eh +T ~ ~~~y27G'~ _~snrefrn `~(44r~t `moo . _ ~<, Proposed I~ I r , ccwD APP,. Rmoned Speacl Cond rie~, • rYPe ~mrn 9z 5 ze n p A,w '.:I R.~~ rea BUILDING PERMIT r o ~~ -~ 9n Rar. ? ~ I ee~~ r.a sewlred APN _ _ r i L Accr i~ j D A. Appr. ^ Rmu rttl ~ eepuired - vAlunno" s v0.0 PIAN Cn FCKwp iE[ - PFRMrt cEE ~1.~ _CJ G' F c.AU.A.-,E i.. E ;*E.MS .EE 5 PFAllililldil(1N tRF .. r,....~~f,. a,v,;u~c. ~ v~;cu ,~r~s~irsS~~K /.LA ...1tC_r VMr'r^,` P4RK Fff - 5.~~ - Cn r~ ~ ({ ~~~N / pru<p g E~ Pbe<nol Sie<Rr~ ATV ~ INm,n ~LO 9.. 6r _ _r v,. ~ nod. ~; Ane, Rer.~r I_! ero,~ n -, un ~r k~~- µ i .~ A A ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ f MH ~ .. err ~ I ~ ~ !f I ~~ C'zSSti ic~ i hs c r n; An,c ^ x.m rn, u I - /~ r O r ~( sA, I ~ . LI ,r ,,, ,., ^..rr.... ~ r•, .,, r. m. .....,ro,M r ,. ~., ,... ^ ... r. ..m . ..~. , . r.,a. ., r.....m. - -- ---- Ir c~ ......_. --- - -- .r...r^:. n , r r r . ...., .. r ,,. r ......_. r , ,r.... ~.. , ~ ~ . r.r..,.r.... rr A r• r r ..,...... - - .r,r......r.. ~. r..rr.r,., ... ..,:,~. .r . ..~ ^ A. r. , ..r~..r...~..r. r._...... A.,~ r.,r~. , ..~. r,r~.. ....,nrrnl.nnrr.nr. ~ ..r. ~~~- `, A.o rM1le n o burld~ng Perm r properly f.lred o r9^o,r .obdnr.d, and r rvbr^rr ro PAP 'aPan rl wod IAn~»nJ.r n +ol ~~ mm a r 1 urPpndn~l o rb.r^dorml for Ia0 aoYr. FOUNDATION IGr. Cerol Comp, ietls, Serbads, Fornf. p.:.! 11001 SlAO/lOTi., GIRDFAO~ MnF, vnp. Barrier. BIFB~. Sponf, A«ny venn, it Lmb•, MASONRY RnnL, Mono• In., Grom Los. Clevv~0un, Boln. ROOT SNTG. NoilwO, D:opF BIx41ng. Maler•o' Grode ovd LF'mkon•. Rool D•o~os. FRAMING Walh, AoP. If Y., BlxFnq, Bmrinp, No~ling. !a<4iny DnpFr. Drap Eraps INSULATION iFrt4ness. RValvei„ Plpmq, Sound Cpvlkinp. fIREWAtLi~ Mwvol, Th•d~eu. Dv:-n<n, Doors. Cloven, Poubb Lnlf. INTERIOR: IAfN; pRV WAtI Nodmg, Svppons, lop; loin) Reinl E%iERIOR LA1M /BIDING MmF, Fmlenav, Low, Raper, TFi<Inmr, Bar Fng. fINR IrviPECIIpN FnnF G•ading Cend., Sope Plan E^<•gY Ce^p :•C vo pfr. ~ A...., fne• Doa E•~ `o<Fng De. s .o eingf. Hou a Nanl:ms, W n..er Sr. pp, Wig. PI Gg: (leer. • INSPECTION RECORD • ~ ' INSPECTION NOTES SWIMMING POOL/SDA E%CAV, REINf SEIAACYC Rnd•uf 41 Acnd m • 6p So' Rnnp loc. s° FENCE/GAIEC NeioF C'osn c~CP -s ~~ ~~~~ ~ 1 Lnr-F<s, 9.,bd.ry I I TIN41 IhSPFC-r G•. I v~.« ov svxA. purrt Acorn w 1 I, ~. _ .__ 9EiA,'.IIG Wpll .. _ _~ __. _.. { I ~... ~f 1:EFP ~ _.._ _ 1 .. _. _.. .._.. P,. JOr {II Erz}n, I^ 1 :r_rrcnov Dnrz wsP. vcN __ l-_- __-.-_ ._._--._ ____-- -_______- r BUILDING AND SAFETY ION city of rancho cucamon ..,,,,,. ~___L__ o_.._,.., n,,..,.,..,,,.,, ['~ 91730 n Tel, 17141 S • BUILDING ga , PERMIT N' iyp< O< . Oa I No Du U e Perm D A. loud<_ _ _ _ ~. u..l __ I Apa<rr<e_ __~ , Aewv<a _ ___ No 'lot Sue u~, IAPN NOPro-,ed •.• ~~ .}I APPrwed , `1II11 APPrnved __ Flon D.. C' ~ = ~._ ~ ~ End Dr". ~ JS~ fl_e Onry ___ _. j~P. ie. $Pfno _~._._. _~_._-_.__ -. Condwor . jr ie . C /'~ yAIUATION S ~ C~ ~- ~s/~ .~a-~ / lrn No_ ~1 ~~~ PIAN CHfCK 1 PFRMIi _ __.. _ _.___Te-.__- - p pp AINAOP _ _ EI ~Z R b<IeNa. _ E SYSTEMS _ __ Ronowd $ BEAUTIE Comlrv/cl~.on _ E/IP~C` / _ / _ _ _ .... `~~d 17 rL ~j Gc~C ~ .. _ _ PAAK I _ - Oiw EA Z o D. Na ` PrD nse~/~~ I Vci,oal;re Pnf. e T/f Sa.e Fr, ~ ISro ms ~_ u I Pr~ar ~1 TJ No ~ )- L N.w ^ Arr ^ r AN. Aeoor ^ D<m I . .'1 P r'l1NTRArttIRP Irft l.n R.\TXI 1 RNAP I N IRIi NR.i' frIMPM1MP ITION Ni f1.AR1T1'rN • r in \ nlli.m rM 1 ~~vr n errrrRrnv ~f n rrvr \ ~ L . ~ ~ .`^. VMr I/~/~ l rr Iw~ U~ Brur~n~ nn.l wPm(tiwnrwr'..I....I m, f ff ~ n I M ^ _ rr rc I rrJ u.nl. n iw~ In n • r n I LLLGIIII {~ ~ v ~/~ [ P r . r I LLJ'~;.~_ lnrl •Il fn.. nn~ef . / ~ , S Tmn f Y~+ _ ANAfIr1N N IrFA'I RPI~II I~A' F P r V ~ nr i~M rn~rFnl b a O . . ~ N .V . rflrrm rlur I • .:~v~n, nw 1.^ ^ 1 v im `ir '.V PTIIIN IIOV .ATliif.\Tf rY Ti NPCNF\TIRN IXAI:RAN ' fr O r . r vAM\ ~r 1:R.5 ) IM rno V w9rrd An .r r rM r r u Ir aw. n n r Iy rom r r nir ...r.nw .r na i \ ~ .. ~l nilr nl N mY ^er P~mm ti rt ~iMlr nrr n. m u r V ~ ~ I L.i • .nn..1 awnrr unani u e 9 Af f M'• N~~ l w. .. i r w.r rn n nrvr r....rv . w..r m,.. . _ i r ) •T ~ w V _ M _~ ..•n•.•' •.- rn•• •••• /~ Vl ~ \ i\nwl r \1 ~ • 1 Rl'RIYTI(1N frlN r r u .. ~ r ^ . rrfnrmanr. N ffµr P r P wt ` n In l l e m N • r nr\ b ~ a g rr rr iwM r,vn I ( rlr~ p r wPUF O.I rVr nnr~ lr ~ n _ vY n y ^ r ^r nr n •nl+wr r\1 Ixr n~ ~ , . mn . N Inn.1 rM rn r l m mrrnrr .n nn V nr ..i.y rArr n. Id ^ P a ' Im.lerr A 1~ O f n rnu.nM.rri n r a .. r fnrmrlne . ~ ' nr.. r. n \ n rw.... Ir.rnu rA. r f " • ^ ^ r NI rn^ w v f l r r .F .....r ...-nwr rn i ir r r rrr .nr.r ~ 11r~~ J ~'" ~N w r \ ^ P 1 r rnrn ~...,n, i n r .m rrn~n O I lwu~l-- eu , r r AX4L _ .... _ ~ ir~ M~Irn e AM ~ J'~/~ T~ ~ _ ~ ~ r~ . / .r ^/r ~ y C { LIL~~// /C %__ r,rr wr. - _ rl~r.rr _.._____ Ir... J , T Tnn r, rv naudrRa P mn .ne, maoenr ron.d oar. „e~nn Pie roodor<d, oad ~• ranle<I la uPtr~rren .I wort In.r.onder a rol mmm.e..d ar n r..pended o nbondmM lar I00 dnyr. rouNOr.no~ ~~ ... .., , fe. z<„ .. FlpCi'LAB -~ ~ ~ B6c Se-,~ ., -. MASCt.R~ <..a ~~.,.. - ~.~~^ 0.n POO: ,_ - p.nnr .. -. .. FR:J! i`' IN$U14' '~~ '~ ca ..G f IRFN'e t ' • INSPECTION RECORD _ I iMEVpv Lni.. ~. , ... i Gnn. '. . Hn~e ~ ~, ' „x,~g7 J'- - _.. _..-..._ --- f ----- ilY ~MMING POOi SoA b, n'. 1 Sn '. INSPECTION NOTES MISCEEIA NEOliS BUILDING AND SAFETY D~ION city of rancho cucamc 93<"0 Baseline. Rancho Cocamonya, Ca. 9. 730 • Tel. aP,ld,n9 ~ Q ~ rs a y r~ Z AOOmes LOI BIOCk irdtr W rvo '',,BB Orvne• ~u 6.'H VV~RY MalRng Ad]reaP CnV Zio rnl O Convaaor ~~~ •_I "°°„p~' 69s' E., ~ (OLD f l~ cnv / C C Z'~ 7L 1B1S9E ~~s s We Z O C Cd C a N Idle ~~~ ~._~ c~v Gassn ~~. me .If.RNPPP MVTRArtn ,y PRfI,ARAiIn\ r Aerr4r .Ili:m iF ^ PV Tr r r F //''~~I .. a. ..: . lJ ~ ........ .......„~,.~ .n r ; . ... ,.. n ..,,...... r ,,, .. m„ ~..., .w . r ~ L. ~..... a-~-._. .._ __...-. _-. a nrr~-.•' r nn ~ r I I,... .~~ nrx. ,:~ ., .~o. ~rl l..x ,~ J r r ~ ~ ELEC./MEfN./PLMBG. Iga PERMIT 41949-iBo3 No Oer o~'Addir Com 01, mdmrnop cx be .. ..--_ . Se,.,nv _T i l5rz 1 I . W IRe:<o~ocu :gF': B. nvFal N e J [ I ~ INp o .. Q OIF[ U ISO..~M _ _ __I _ _ _ pp Sq. Fr A:eo Ncw U Readeernl Bldg (a' i W 1 A:eo Ne.. BV m Rlo, ar .. . F.. n,~n.a F.e TOTAL ELECTRICAL FEES N. (•~....~i.~r I :1....ri.l.~~ ^ fee FAU d l ' C W F- mv omp: ra n! BaJeri Im;~n BLU ' b 6 endue. ~ NR , ~ N FAU o~ i le I c ~ IGOOW 91U 3 R IS HR o 6' N'iP 5 e A h dl :b d Q e ' r . ~ ~ I I n.PO9 1m Il ~ : No l_r vBH ~ I ~~ and ~ rn ro9 :rm m 1 Z F~, ia•F,. 1 a :~ ^ 1 ~ ..a ~ C '^ ^` I W 49e TCTAI MECHANICAL FEES ' :. ,!.,.:,n 'm o.,., pl.en rye S W ~ r ,:~ I o~•.: i ~ ! Bcr ,o F r Sew t r: A 4rµ ~ / r. v ~~~~ ` G4 ` //~ J .n v. i.i a 7')iAL PLi1M1191NG FEES ~'y.•a~'z~ °'f~~ TOTA ELEC., MECH., PLMBG. FEES f~ G1 Z_- ... .. ~ a Rro< av./~, IG , 5C ~ r.-rli_l S - __. o.e s ~ ~'~~._ ..~cZ~~ o.,, ~_~ s q a ~ ~al~d~ ' ~~° 3 ~ "n~------ --~--- ---L1-2~ nm . .Ie r. ,mil/m.:en~ .:Ip ~„d I, ~ .r.. p:o.,.,lr le1.d a r'v..d ~~d . d.dm.d, oed .. rvbi"n ro ..o.,n c~ I ~.n In..a.d., , .I : w>nrn ., wwmdul Pr nbondmed ro: ~^0 dryr. ROUGH WIRING I __ NE'N SERVICE __ FIXTURES -_-~- ~-~ ~ _ - ----_ ~-----_~_ FINAL ELEC. INSP. TEMP. POWER POLE OTHER OTHER ._. ___ _. __. _._, -._.__. -_.___ ELEC. UTILITY CLRNCE. U. G. DUCTS/REFRIG. LINES ou<n, cemn. e.+, RO MECH . , srpp>n, v.en feu/ec unn FINAL MECH . __ __ yfnn, SM1UrofL _._ OTHER _. _.. OTHER __. -.- nr- nieinco uo Son, wm<~. _._., -.._ _ . - ~ om, e.ooan _.1 _. .. _' - _ -_.__ ~I _. _ ._... _. -_ - we%~, ce+, vdn, RO PLMBG I I . . Soo n+, flmM1i.m GAS 7EST FINAL PLMBG. o.m.<` vol.<+, I w.m v WATER HTR~. +_a'~a, ' f.. + SEW/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM i OTHER r, _ •ir~' ~ r OTHER _.._ _. - t~+73 /~~~~ v^/ BONDING LLG CUNUUi GAS PIPING u~i<~,~i ~•r'+ G r~9 7EST IBE/ I I u •. ~ ~< on FIN4i I'uUL I(F~', , FINAI POOL PLMBG. ~ll~[R INSP+~rION D:1TF. INSP. SIGN. SEWER/PRIN. DISP. SYSTEM DIAGRAM r.~i_~~~1 ;`L . TP •- 7 ~~~ ~? +%~" Z CW L a. ~~ W Q BUILDINp AND SAFETY C SIGN city of rancho cuc ! ~ Cannualian ~~ ~M. I / - W. W.0.. JF Slam p„{ry ~w N~ Add. ^ Ml.r. ^ Rpeir ^ WmWiHm 2 IAOOI~m COM~YDIOY~ D[¢.MTroM 1 w.M tlM 1V 1 w'- wy I:wYw M OYw 1 I~naw ~ VrYn fixl Y DI.Yw I w W rl .:Wlwl C.Y ul y n:we Y 1. M nup W d1~ O DIIMmFDIDY DL'YY}bt 1 wi Mlrn IY I w ~1 fw 1y tiyOwY 4~ Yn M Yr ~ M - ~ 4a y It FYw ~ IM~Y. dY A1:h` w uwa _ ~~n~yy ~ti. tlYr. bw.w. 4wrlly n r1W w7 tl~ 1Y Iw~n W ww~ rY ~. a~~w~lr~ti~ r ~n ~ gyn.. V 4.. fYWr 1 Iwr.r1Y ~Y InY nWllll ~M I:w.1.nV. C~Yw~ M.r. Pwn Iw llr Y ry1 1 M 1 M I4 i.lw wl wrw11Y~ AM KYW~ M IwW. 1wIJ~A ~~~1 M..M~Y~~ y W yllln.l u . Y MM 4 M ~. Yw IY. YMw Yin 1wwt. O M :4 I:.w4. n 1YM1 ~ nY ~ :Mr nY ~ ~_ nN Y IV w1. Y. 4w1Y. Y M WJ r bwJ Ar }.r I:~n rJ~hyMl. iYwr ti T.NwYn COY: 14 CwY.4ry Linn lr nwm.4A~v .4 Rf4.. :-..... Ynn..r W C ono :uw ~ wn wr MwY~`. ~r'~ r~ r Y~rlw.~ u:'wiY. C~ .I w.nw W Y Y w wy n lynM M IM wrlw M n41 G ~1. r inn ~( 14 ~.wmV. 1 W~ ~~Yy /M ~CW: ~r i4 CwY M~ Ll~s (M in ~/Y~yyyn I.nri .fir Y i, ~ ~ (~jw ~ ~wY.li 1 w1YYn O 1 u ~~.wl ~Yr Rw.~~ •!.6 Y, UY ~ ~ / / FILE CQPV V /~.~ 1851 BUILDING PERMIT ~~~. YAIUAiION~. S MAN CXKA M tMli F DRAINAGE SYSiFMf 1 HAVME W. Yr~ MOR[RY LOYIgy}pry DC4YTpM I al w.eM' HM 1 Vw . wYOnY ~ wwl Y m16Ywn n . aNM1 fYn G4.1 ~^IM IwYUn, w . n:Ollw ~r Ynnf h IM. 41h M O 0:1. Y Ibl n1111- b. ~ ~i CRIwTDMTR OR Q RIDII 40T/1~ CANIMMTIIM t• ..w......rw4 rlawa ~~r.Rn .~Yr.w rr. nlw ~1 ao'"i W a Y. n.lmr~ i O IF1= .W Y NnR Y'- MwYn' fw.t.~~.Yn yw .1 OYFnI - 4 ~w .µel NOTICaY AIyGOMT. 1/, y4r wYq W C.rlyfw4 M IwMY. n. tlnY 1~ M W llwirl Lw~~Iy~ ~nµ~~ ./ I~alnY ~rM M4 mW wwlrlr.r.r IW nwl L M v w~YL 1 4:M. .Mw W1 Yn. ~rt1V 1y'I~O~Oy14~YI ^/ :4 ro.Y M Mly tlY m.wl Y Ym~ IM. wH. cY Cw. ~ w4rww 1..bY M~ I~nYM1 MI I r ULL 1 4n r yNuy ny W Y InFlq ItiY.u Ayy~aYr`:s.~lln. a vl Y ~ uJ w X11 Ml~w ..i Yw..1.n n1x .M m iw mFI,=Y.~ .I M AWlrr I /.... 6 D.tll. A..w_ ~O ~.., .... RAh aar/wiel: i ~~ ~!/!~ m wro.rb rdad wr, na~»a e:w .oudm.d, o~d ,. Iwarr a n nal eomm.ncM or it rvwlMW w obDManW le. Im M:Rr r L/~1 h, ~ ( II n l~ ~ ~~n ~- G- v jccC ~- ,~,.~ l~- r~~~ /,..~ . ~~; /ec~~ - ~~, ~/ y~/ 1 ~ /' ~ t, UGJ'~ ' ~- i..~ . i ..~.. I 1 I ~_ I ~ _I ..~, i ~ I I, I i ~, I. i. I. ,I .I ~ ~~ i ~ i i i 1 j..a~'~ ,I. i f I~ z, t is !II!Ilii .' a~ I ~~ pe~P ~ ~ ~~.. /~~~~ ~r~ ~, i ~ - ~` ~~:~~+ ~,~ ~~~; _; it `I I ~ ~r S 1LM i l N• ~ I 1 I I big 'i ~ ,~ ,I~ ~; ii' ~ ,I! I~{~., 1. ,.,, a~~ /~~'/a- ~~ '~'~~to ' far. .~ J i. ~ i '! .l..l.~ I ~ I ill I,. I,L I I. i I ~ ,J. L l i i i I I i I bi i 1'_i i ~: i Ji ~ i I X56. l.i t~IIIi '. ..; '~ I 'I___' i i .~I I i~ ~.i . ~.. DEC ~:_L_I.~.,. I ~ i .~ ._ F-,- -f--~=~;i--(~ hoc/~ ,. , ~ L ~ it J ~ ~ I ~~ ` i~ 4~ / . 1 Y ' Ir i w v , _ , i ~~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 i ~~' .} i ~ ~. ' ~ ~ } i; ~ ~ ! ! .., _. ~.~ ,~::J . ..~ ~ ._.~ -~ .. . ~~.. _~. ~~ '~ r .. ' .:, * ~! 4 _) ~ !--t .I 1. I ~.:. ~ . ! ~ ~ l .I .j.. { I . i... ~ -f ~ I -1: ~ : -1 ~ . !,,, i ~; ~ j ww I ~ I ! I /Gn 3~f /0~3~ 3 ~~~~~v ~~,d~b ~~~~`fV 'C~ ~-a~y ~~ ~~~~ ~, ~. ~, ;,..:~i ~~ 7 ~,. ; i o ~.,._i .~ 4. ~'I 1 . j ~ j~~1il.; ~ ,i i L .4 ~- I .l .l I i.. 1.1--I. I ~ i Iii I I i.l i i i roe ~ ~~. ~~ {~ ~~ ~~' ~G iI i _ .I i. 1 IIIi lil! lilt . I.i I I,~ I ~ ~ ~ 6 a. .I I I I ~n1 M/, III I , 'r . ~ ~ I - _ ry I~.( l J _ ~~ I I. 1 i .' `IJ/'r ~ +I _ a ~ ~ ;-... Qi~,.. ~ .~ ~ L L i ., . . ~.. ~.~...J...J ~ ... : i_1 l.i i ,,. ~ _i..li.. ' °, h T i ._ . _ ~ i~ ~I ! ~ _ I ~ '~ • . _ _ ~ ' ... f ;r , ., ~ - ~ .. , L , ,~ ~' + 7 f M N '~ ~ -: r~- h. ~~ . ., V M1 ~. :. T --I ~~oL,~ ~` ~ ~ ~Qc1e'G'CT.G'-- .~-~~" r I. ~~...' ~. ' i nI ~j~, 6; .,, ~ .{ .. , ~ :: Q. _ ^ : ~ _ ~ ~ , c ~~ ~ ~.c'1 ~., ~~, ,... ,. ~~'~ r. _. ~~. ~_ :~ ~ ~-; ;~..~~, ~~i.ii._ 1 i_ .......I . i~.~.i. ~ f ~_~ i i 1..... i.l.!. i . t. ~_ i ~._L l? ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~, '~ ~., ~' ~~~ r... ~~~~ ~ ~: ;! ~- fi ,i~i.ll ~ i.),. '~ ~ i i ~~~r~ 9UII~INO AND SAFETY *810N BUILDING c t~f rancho cucamon~ pJp~y~ EOlldq Ca. 01770 • T•1. 1 a . p~M~ IE6) _ . ff •FF~ ~y2L~Q U Os rr C~i•I. .b~F S. ^ t! ~ Ire , • a- Mw 0.. W I ~' l K/NSc N ~tt'M 7 H1 } °i'~ DAV 10 ( r 1.1 fw IlI1 w,~, ~: . 2 _ Vn 7, - - 7+•! tI ~Y - _ r F~~ W ~. _ r. w, ~ .7' n~~°°ov+ _ L n ~ N W-1R RY.4~ br1.r~ ra.nco~~-Z- ~ ~~ '1 ~.ws: O N6/t _- a r~ .. vF1 ~ 3 /DO .o fw LLc Cry ~ ~ UO ' ~' SQ Ns.. 6-,. . .J ~ - c• fM - ~- ~.. rr_ E E T ~ „~.., V1F?IC _u,~~y PoyEK d _. _ ~rr~- ~.i~ ~t~-~ -- !'- arr~cE ? ~u ---- --- ~-- t -f - ~° _z sap n. Jr'/B fw-~= vr:n.d _ urars :errYx ~n~oc~u+wx .I ~ ~ ~ 1~: ' ~ ' r.iurv wociu McuwN~ (LMU" 1~•~ .M"w1 ~r M Y ^ ~f Y • ~ fW p W. •rl ~ .-r 1 ~ I+w. rr ll~ ~ ~ G . _ I.Y~ M1 ~ ~ eYr= NIO =YY[4ulp V= Iw M F' ~ I r.Y rr ~ M a NU•.• O .u~~pY~.Y N YLt Ot mYOU ' ` 'Y I rll '. YW ~ ~ ti.~ ~ .wr~~. M~ h r ry yW,Y ~~~~ w`Y ~ rN w..• ti~r.~M~ .~' ^ r ' ll011 O r0•• t4 rwr .rA r~WrIY ` Y M w~ W rY. IMf ` , h ~_ i ~ti` ... r ~ wYr,I YAW ry /NT ~ ~ 1 Y~ 11r a ~r~ r ~~ r ~ WPM. ~Ir~ ~~ `I/ ~ . r Ki^.h a.'_r • ..I+~rYrJ M^~i ~: r ..w .~ r ~. ,r ~iW. 4..•+.w ~ M Cwu Yj I~wr n r~ <r lY r dr rY1 YY x N! M1 AIY[NAMf If A Y ...r. - v ~r`.~ . n ... rY ! ~ .Ir.rr .rrl ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ Fr .rv YY Y ~ 1fn~i~ ~~T~.rs sdoft~M~'- CI ~ { ~ ~y~ V' IMF ... • ~ y IN4A'1JV .u ~~~ :'W IY V y .. ... yi~4 Mt ti .M d ~YrR •1 II•VfT101~ ~YMb YYCI ~Y ~~Y yy ~ Y. r •rti~~ 1 b,Yi xT „~ l~ l L M •r' f.Y O yy ~ r ~~ Yu.YI r rlti In~iY•~l r ~ ^ . A Ir ~ rrMii ~ I~W Y W~ ~ WM.w Qi d m ~I+. /wWl rr ~~ ~ n„Y• r,rY Sir '~ Y r 1.~'v MIS-. _ _ u'M'M O .Y 'I I ~ ~ _ ~~YY ~ Y ' M ~ ~ rrF - Y .-.Iyfwr.~~Nr ..V ~.1 , ~ ~ ~ . =y :Ir r~L y iJ ~V i/W~ yw~'~~~~nw j ~rib A,M1,r •yr~Y. ~.~ ~~i .n. .r.w,w. ...r ~ Sn r .._.4/e4_.-ate..- ..W -iM--'fie .UA4.}.~.--_ iw. r n•__ - ~J . 11b 4 a MIF^r ixr ~~ .M^ Ywr4 r .W »~ • ~YnF sA .elAaM rl .i W1jn1 r, . .wMMY I .dl M•.rW ., M n. ~w..J d v :vMmaw' a Y,nb~•/ ld li JT• • pc~Tn^ ~. .. ~I aclD. w[.in,s'.'~,r:~r« ~n , a.w' y[rfCNH~ U+l, +wrrr "-r1 i~N, Or.QN. Y11 [} YqI SMG N+irry. DiM w••ly Ibr~ GwM w 11.bn~. bo1 aa.rr u I+MNWi WeIA. teX. 4t. Mul.-.l. ua[W. 4arr^'0. pa1N. !TaCY' Mr Sb~ .My1~!Idk iAeler•, I.Vnw Th I STS ~' G+wp. ' 011[A'M!L W'w~l. 11..[[nw.:UAwI. Dwr1. ~~!- C4wn. Iwb4 InA dE -- T' :MIIpt :AUn O(I 'nieiL 'Mn.ra. ''vp/~. +! rm. mw1 girl 7DPf.a ;TW SIDING N.1, latln`N ii! ~M[ nv~~\np ^ {~ '1x4 IHSI(<TpM SNaF r~nEmp !'[p, _Y it 'e. (i+ryy Cagr ~prG lnr~e ~a 4[w[ v~.ro J~~N • etlMyt.' ~ ' W.u Wunt~ n W«r rw Sr < ~ tpr ~[ 1'Va ~~?.1u•~ ' ~, SWIRIMINO IOOI/E/A 'lOfrW, ctiw[Yre1C1:•-x-wa~nnysn-.-eo.dur~_r-•~ TY 1utl_OV.V la. Su•d'^T. Spn IrNA. C! ~ T p~~j ~.. L 7..._..__.-_.~.. .f wSL n[.yr oorr q[.n arry. ___ _._____~. ..~.. ~.~_ j .Pe.. ,oFmT ~ rVi rhL`f.C"RCN [ur r ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ .~-• •_ ~• l/ISCEIIANfOUE ~ ___. __ _... ,., __ _ __ _ ._- _ u, uwi ncnrv _ f ,.~___ ._ i _.._ _ ...._ . _ .. ~____ F _7 .. .. 41.F. 'Nqt ~_ .. ...__. ... ~.~...~_. ___ r i 4 ~ r "--~^_ ._._ _. .. ._ ~.~ g4 SY5 FC M F . i _ _ ... __ ~_~ 1 _ 1 .. .. ..~ _.,~___~ .. IFf4 I j %lf ' I _. 1 ...._ _ I I _. .. .. .. ~_ .... _ .~.~...~ ~_ r MS-EGT1a1V rf0'f~5 ^ ~r E ' .r ~ ~^ Cp•dM I•.YV•RRU . o TICOR T'~^.E NSU4ANCE CCV P?'.v ,..•..._ ~ .,_ . ...........:...° ~ 63-156125 ••••" ~++.•,< i..=L. M.^..ar•. - : RECORDED M OFFlCIAL RECUROS~ °• ~", ^ ••~^••~ ,.^~ -+ SAN Eknn~AGINO COUNTY, CALIF, ^~-- NO FF nre ... ' .. P _ y ~ Corporation Grant Deed -~ ~ ~ P,19 [ A +I 1 API { gA11 f1f4. J!Ov. ~e .. ~ - ~ . ... .. Y ]N: Y!t nti:M °v •: pn' VAC?a I ... Jf Rl\'C V.. ~.: 4"'F i 1. a. A '. ' ..,... r. :~4 ~... ... ~~ rt~t[ m a~rwMn _• _ s, T ~ ~ t n~ 1..+ ,r._lii4y " S .LLOY M. ~a e..... .. j y+«... ~rlwrs~arri ~ tl .w ^. ..u.- M (/.~~ ~T'+ YJ 1. 101 ~ yyyy..~~...... TT.. O .p.v ~yM. /I~•••yj y^ a J~[•.ZD AR`s[ . n a ..u t vwuM . .~ .~ m PfscUlit Cn xp, d3-5: Ik H A PEEOLOTI CN OF Tor CITY bC'ACIL OF THE C3 TY GF ~ PAHCYO NCAPMJNOA, CAC IFOAN IA, AUTNOPC2IVG illE ~ PCPCNASE Of PEAL PAO P F.P TY LCCAT_°p AT T!IE YOPt4EAgT COPNEP Of SAUNA ErpF,ET AHD 4.I L'VEPH AVE.4L'f :Y PA4C110 ~ CL'CANJNC A. 1 Re CI[y CecnCa of the CkY of Pa n ate .cappnga. :all fG rnla, M1IreCY r<ao lvea a fallow: :°^I^N :: ^.e CITY Q•yJ n^II or [tn. el er rf ae.^:h: ^: eaz ;da. ".a:: foi nla, nereby eu LhprltU epa pu rCM ae ty the Cl ty of flmchp [ueamenga, Celltorn lA. Iroa [M1a Duper C!:eflo f, tM1e LT lpo Bealn HYplal pal Ve ter Bl atr le [, Clle teal property toeaue •C tM northcaac c rner C' 9ellne Scree: anC when Avenue, [Iry of Aa neM1C C cAaorgb County e1 Sen Bernerel n0, 9p Ce !( Cnltforn:a, en re part le ular ly Eeaerl uC a (olfpva: Parcel 2o9-CYt-uY of Pa re el wD YB-5. P.M. V6/Y1,g2, PD r. Cucaeo:ya Prv 1t unea, N.B r Y/g. SUBJECT N: All reaarveClona, r<a [r lc [tpna. r10.':ta eM r1gFt- of-vay of recpre. 9[tt20N 2: Nl cn raapecc to the property refa rreC m herelmbove, Che Cl [y CounC 11 hereby evtMrizea LM Cl ty of PanepD Cucamnga, G1Ifern L, to pay Ne a~pun[ of ~A9, 100, In caaM1, upon cleae of cec rav. [o CTInC Baaln Hunlo lPal 0tK Bletrlc t. S¢[TION 3: TTa CIly Clark la auN Orl zeH ane elreecea to pnDare all nvaYa need anC otMr Inatrvaanta Nwaatry [C affa!luala tM lxCAalya of lane, ana tM uae atoll ba •IgMC DI the Clty Clark ae to attepgnca en Oelu if of [M Cl ty. T:a Clry Clark la a ChCr f:eE anE lnatrvetlC eo .ae.pt .pa ep rC In eM Offl ae of eM coun[Y pbeereer of Sn gernare lne Ceun CY, u llfarn la, a OeeC or true: vIIh reapeet ea ea ld real property herelMbuve eeacrlbea. ' PASt¢p, APPBOV¢p, ane ADOPf¢U [M1 Se :A[C my pf wy, t903• AtPS: pane, BWueq 9chloeeer, Prpa t, Xlke la NOF9: Nato ABBEHT: Mane Jo Mlke la, Naypr ~ z AITPJT: ~ '1 II` J~,N ~~ Vuren N. VaeaerNM, city Cler4 ~ ` TM 1alBDMW ytk1fCVPYa1:5 b is NM raCi copy of IM gt~MNl on /Ih ~ in the clllco IP'L3 ' ATTEST:..1~4fQ'~--~--~ UUPEN M. WA44EflMFN GbCc p~}7Lp7;Nqr~C7 CA /M~JL~7Wa13~1/{(/~ 'fir _ ( ~ A Y m w --~~:. Tne loregoing Inslmmml b a cw~ rest copy of the onginel on flb m (Mi p111CG II.JA'_'~ '„~ WASSERMAN Gity yy4V~a~rk. paphl~rp~ye~6A NY'.11L`Yai ~ ~ rig. lss!! /~MV~ I r exlnnlt A that portion of the Norchw•t ene-quarter oL the Northwu one•quarcer of tM Southwrt one-Qu•rar o[ Section Il, }o,n:•h!p I South, Hanle 7 YaK, Cuc•aen{• Tinder In [M County o[ San Mrn•rElno 8uu a[ C•I/lornta, •• pry Wp recorded in neok 6 Pap 9 0[ tLp•, In cM O[[ic• oI the county Reco[d•r o! uld County, deecrtbed a lollwe; t•tlnnlnt we [h• Ewthw•t corner o! Wt 77 0! Tr•cc Ko, 5747, a par N•p ncerdN Ln took 66, h{•• Il and IT o! 1Ypa, in cM O![!n of cM County teeerda o[ utd Ceuncy, Throw Norch .tent iM Mai !tn• nl uld Lo[ 77 •M eM Mat line s.' We S2 0! aid Tr•ec No. 3747, to ch• Eeuch•uc ~ corner eL the 1•M eenveryed eo eM C~ mey of tat Mrn•rdlno by Mad ~„~ neordM April 10, I9y5 4n took 9421, Pap t67 0l 0!!!el•l Meorde e! ••ld County; Thence 1/•a .loot the South line oL utd Caoety property to ch• Eeuthwa Carney cMreot, utd petne •UO Mlnt tM Weerly lea Y^~ e( N•lwrn Aw, a conwyd to County of 5•n Mrn•rdlno, by Med neorded May 7, 1960, Ln nook 5127, Pete 402 0! Ol/leial Meord• o/ pid County; ~ Thence SoutMrly, Southeuterly and G•terly along the Lacerly line o[ Malvern Aw. and ttu Xorth line e[ Sd !m Sc, to the point of MlLnnlnt. .. th:a :his is a . ~ ~ ', ~ the ..°3i _r~/ .. ].'1'., ,gnd lit / \!i. A,. ~-cr cc r.icr ^,,n Bernardino County, Calif. ~jr ~.~\?~ Fn•.~A'~~ ..~