Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989/05/17 - Agenda Packet
u - CITY COUNCIL ~ ~ -~ A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. Nay 17, 1989 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Ranrhn r'nramnnne City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Kayo. Pamela 1. Wright, co~„~rrm.marr ~ Deborah N. Brown, Huvo. n,.rm Charles 1. Buquet, counrumrmEn William 1. Alexander, co~arum.Te.. •~• Jack Tam, cu. Ararwr.. James L. Markman, City drmrney Beverly A. Authelet, cur ce.x City Office: 989-1851 Lions Puk: 980-3105 / J City Council P Hay 17, PAGE All itaa submitted for the City Council Agcnd• must ba La writing. Tbm deadline for submitting these rtes is 5:00 p.m. ' on the WWae•d•y prior to ehc meeting. The City Clcrk'• office raceive• x11 avc6 items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pled9¢ of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Bzown _, end Wright B. ANNOUNCOffiNTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring Hay ae YHCA Ma nth. C COIn1UNICATIONe FROM TBH P1 IC This i• the time and place for the general public to address the Citp Council. Bexte law prohibits the Citp Council from addressing •nq iuw sot prcviouclq included oa Lhc Agmnd•. The City Council may rmeeive teetimoay sad ut the utter for • •uD•cqucat acting. Codcats •n to be limited to fiw mivucea per inmivatlu•1. 1. REOVE ST FROM COALITION FOR BETTER GOVERNMENT IN ANCHO L CUCAHONCA - For a motion to be made and paes¢d Dy the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga that Councilmember Deborah Brawn be censured foz her failure to carry our she reeponeibil it ice of the public trust in an aproprlate manner. D CONSENT CALENDAR The following Coocent Calendar ilea are expected to be routine and son-controversial. They will be acted upon by she i 1 Council xt one time without diaeua.imn. Anp rtes mny Da i removed by • Comcllmember or amber of the xvdieace for diacusaioa. 1. Approval of Hinutee: April 5, 1989; April 19, 1989; April 27, 1989. r; ,a`~, r..' j Ciiy Council Agend ~~~~~Sy~' Hay 17, 198 PAGE 2 2. Approval of Warranter Register Nos. 5/3/89 and 5/10/89 2 and Payroll ending 6/27/89 for the total amount of $2,514,746.78. 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for off-Sale Beer b Wine 13 Eating Place for Elly'e New York Pizxa, Roohollan Ajodanifar and Alieh Sharif i, 9155 Archibaltl Avenue, Onit C. 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Eating 15 Place for Hango's Beachfront Cafe, Tumbleweed Grill, Incorporated, 8034 Haven Avenue. 5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General, 1988 17 Conditional Priority t29 for Haven Wine 6 Liquor Company, Frank E. Horra, 8461 Haven Avenue. 6. Approval of proposal Eor shielding aporte field lights at 19 Heritage and Red Nill Community Parke, to install cu atom designed louvers to minimize glare and light spillage ae designed by custom Lighting Company, Tuet in, California, in the amount of $52, Ofi1.00 plus lot contingency to Pacific Electrle Company, Buena Park, California, to be funded from Park Development Fund I20-4532-8806. 7. Approval to execute agreement (CO H9-069) between the 47 City of Rancho Cucamonga end the Chaffey Joint onion High School District for use of Et iwanda High School property in lieu of limited annual maintenance. e. Approval to award and execute a Professional Servlcee 50 Agreement (CO 89-079) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and J.F. Dav idaon Associates, Incorporated, for the prepare[ loo of Design Plane, Contract Spec if icatlone and Engineer's Eetimat ee on the Lemon Avenue Storm Drain Improvements starting from Amethyst Street east to the Lower Alta Loma Channel between Archibald and Harmoea Avenues. The per diem not to exceed fee of $40,150.00 ($36,500.00 plus lot coot ingenc ire), will De footled by the Drainage Fund Account No. 23-4637-8863. ~ ~ i 9. Approval to award and execute a P. o'_aasioral Services , 51 Agreement (CO 89-OHO) between the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga and DGA Consult ant e, incorporated, for the preparation of oeeign Plane, Contract Spaclf Scat ions and Eng Sneer's Estimates for weterehed Area XII, 7th Street Stocm Drain between Center and Haven Avenues. The not Co exceed fee of $31,636.00 ($28,760.00 glue lot contingency) will be funded Dy Aaeaeement District No. 82-1 R Funtl s, Account No. 83-4637-6028. City Council Agana ~~~~~~ Nay 17, 198 PAGE 3 10. Approval to execute a Profeesionai Service Agreement (CO 52 89-081) with Austin-Faust Aeeociat ion, Incorporated, for Traffic fingineerinq for the re-opening of Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and San Benito Avenue with a connection between Highland Avenue and 19th Street at San Benito Avenue, and the traffic studies fcr the related General Plan amendment. The fee will De a maximum of $10,540.00 to ba funded from System Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8852. 11. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-OB2) for the Red Nill 54 Park Drainage Improvenreni Project awarded to Marrie Construction for the amount of $200,105.73 ($181,914.30 plus lot coat ingnncy) to be funded from Capital Reserve Funds Account No. 25-4285-7043. (Awarded on May 3, 1989) 12. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement (CO 89-083) $5 for installation of a portion of a Master Flnnned Storm Drain Facil it tea in connection wish development of DR 86- 13, located south of 9th Street, approxvsately 1300 feet east of Vineyard Avenue, between Arrow Vineyard Associates and the City of Rancho Cucamonga - DRA-09. 13. Approval to award and execute agreement (CO 89-084) for 64 Planning Services with CM Engineering Associates, Incorporated, for various Planning Services to be funded by Contract Services Account No. 01-6333-6028. 14. Approval of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of )3 Completion for Tracts 12802-2, -5, -6 Storm Drain located on the southeast. corner of Mt. View Drive and Spruce Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $134,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 13x400.00 i i i ~ i RESOLUTION NO. 89-210 i )4 i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THfi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IHPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12802-2, -5, -6 STOPM DRAIN, AND AUTNORI2ING TH6 PILING OF A NOTICE OF COHPLET ION FOR THE WOAR ~,.r ~. PAGE ~* City Council Aqend Y Aay 17 198 ~~~ 4 , ,~ ~ 15. Approval to release cash deposit in the amount of $500.00 75 to Shelburne Development Corporation for Subd ivieion Sign for Tract 12993. 16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for: Tra<t 10035 located o th et 'd f c P d a ]6 •t` -f Red H'1' `z cl b D l a bm'tt d b R n h Associates RSSOLUTION N0. 89-211 ~) A RESOLUTION OF TEIE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 10035 Tracts 12642 12935-44 Lentl a~ 1 t d the $Q northe t me f Milllke A ue and Hi hl d A e submitted by Kaufman and Hroad RESOLUTION N0. 89-212 $j A RESOLUTION OP TMS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGPSEMENT S%TSNSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACTS 12642, 12936- 44 LANDSCAPE Tra<t 13697 lcceted o th eo th e t er f Ha n $3 _ Avenue and Carrari Street. eubm'tt d b Daly H mss RESOLUTION N0. 89-213 $a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POA TRACT 13697 Tract 13425. located on the th s'de f 19th St a $6 b t H A s a d Hiahl d A enu bmitt d b1 i ~ ~ Clented Development ~ RESOLUTION NO. 89-214 $~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IM PAOVHMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT S$CURITY FOA TRACT 13425 ~'~s~; r 1. City Council May 17 PAGE Tract 13476. located the th t r f H 11 89 Avenue and Tryon St r¢et b 'tt 3 b W t V t Development RESOLUTION NO. 89-215 9~ A AEEOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOFGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT HXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13476 Tract 13110 located on the east aide of Haven Avenue 9? between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Paracon Homes RESOLVTION NO. 09-216 93 A RESOLUTION OF 1'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVElU3NT AGREEMHNT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 13110 17. Approval of Parcel Map 12057, and Ordering the Annexation 95 to Landscape Maintenance Diet rict No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for Parcel Mep 12057, located at the northwest corner of Feron Boulevard and Helms Avenue, submitted by Western Et atee Development. RESOLUTION NO. 09-217 96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHG CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN lA, APPROVING PARCEL MAF NVMBEA (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 12057) RESOLUTION NO. 89-218 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDECAPE i i t i i MAINTENANCE DISTP.I CT N4. 3 AND STP3?ET LIGH?IN3 i MAINTENANCE ^ISTAICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR TRACT 12057 10. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement 1~~ security for Tract¢ 13748, 13057 and 13058, located at the southwest corner of Eanyan Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by M.J. Brock and Sons. r city Council Agend ,~~~~~3~ May 17, 198 PAGE 6 RESOLUTION NO. 89-219 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMgNT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY OF TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 19. Approval of Hap, Improvement Agreement, Improvement 103 Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 Eor Tract 13359, located on the seat aide of Sapphire Street, south of Hills ids Road, submitted by N.E. Heim, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 89-220 10G A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OP IUNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTr IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13359 AE SOLUTION NO. 89-221 105 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCTL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13359 20. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement 108 Security and ordering the Annexation to Lantlecape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Tract 73304, located on the northwest corner of Terre Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Nomee of California. RESOLUTION NO. B9-222 110 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY i i i i OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~ IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPAOVEHSNT SECVRITY, ANO FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13304 .'t:~ ; p City Council Agend ~~~~Y P~ Hay 17, 198 PAGE 7 RESOLUTION NO. 89-223 111 A RHSOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDHAING THE ANNE%ATION OP CSATAIN THRRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT i33G4 21. Approval of proposal to designate the Hippard Ranch, 114 13181 Victoria Street, Rancho Cucamonga, as a landmark - Thie unique rock and cypress log home has been rehabilitated Dy James and Marsha Hanks? it was designed and built in 1916 by San Francisco Bay area archltec[, Carr Jone a. RESOLUTION NO. 89-224 12$ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE HIPPAAD RANCH, LOCATED AT 13181 VICTORIA STREET, AS A LANDHARR 22. Approval of Prel lm inary Engineer's Report and Setting 134 Public Healing on June 21, 1989 to levy the Annual Assessments and approve the Final Engineer's Repor[ for the Park and Aecreat Son Improvement Diei[ict (PO-BH). RESOLUTION NO. 89-225 135 A RE SOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF P.REL IMI N.AAY APPROVAL OF CITY ENC INEEA'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE PARR AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-86) RESOLUTION NO. 89-226 143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS i i i t i W iTH tN THE PARR AND RECREATION IMPROW-MENT ~ DISTRICT (PD-86) AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOA PUBLIC HEARING THEREON 23. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting 146 Public Nearing on June 21, 1989 to levy the Annual Aeee9amente and approve the Final Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Naintenance Distrlet Noe. 1, 2, 3, 4, E entl 6. "_,.~ ~ ', r: , City Council P May 17, PAGE RESOLUTION NO. 89-227 i4$ A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CI T't ^cNGINBER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ^ISTRICT NOS. lr 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FESOLUTION No. 89-228 ~ 325 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LE4Y AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 POR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 PVAS UANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LYGHTINC ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERS NG A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 26. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting 327 Public Hearing on June 21, 3989 to levy the Annual Aeseaemente and approve the Final Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5 and 6. RESOLUTION NO. 89-229 I 329 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3E, 4, 5 AND 6 RESOLUTION NO. 89-230 441 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO3. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5 AND 6 FOA FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 PURSUANT TO TN@ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOP. ~ ' i ~ ' HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 25. Approval to set Public Xear ing foe June 21, 1989 for the 443 formal ion of Landscape MaLntenance District No. 7 for Tract 13566-1 and -3, located south of 2dth Street, we at of cherry Avenue. i'. _,.~ , y:. 1f' ~ City Council Agend ~d~d~{,yA May 17, 198 PAGE 9 RESOLUTION NO. 89-231 454 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 RESOLUTION N0. 89-232 455 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING PRELIM INAAY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 RESOLUTION NO. 89-233 456 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCS DISTRICT NO. 7 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordivavicea Dave had public Dsariaga at thm tLe oc carat reamvg. Smcontl rutlnvga ars expected to Dm routine and von-covtroveraial. TDey rill Da acted upon by the Council at one time xithout diacuasion. The Cily Clerk will read the title. Avy item can bm removed for disvuasion. NO Items Submitted. !. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items bavm Daev advertiaad and/or posted sa public hearivga sa required Dy law. The chair will open thm meeting to receive public batiawvy. +. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ^icmarrm 457 AMENDMENT 89-01 - CITY OF _ABNCNO CUCANONGA - A request to ~ amend i. 89 ac [ee OI the OeVelopment D1etYicte Map from Medium Residential (8-id dwelling unite per acre) Go Low- Medium Residential (4-B dwelling units per acre), located approximately 800 feet south of Lemon Avenue, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue on the east aide of Archibald Avenue - APN 201-252 -d 1. ''_'~ ~: PAGE City Council Agend ~ ~ ~~,,~~~ May 17, 198 10 ORDINANCE NO. 394 466 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIPORNIAr APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A!1&NDHENT NO. 89-01, AMENDING 3.65 ACRES OF THH DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING VHITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-Y.EDZUH RESIDENTIAL (4-B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE(, LOCATED APPROX IHATHLY 600 FEHT SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE, 470 PEET NORTH OP HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHI BALD AVENUE, AND MAEE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TFIEAEOF 2. CA 89-02 DRAFT SAN BERNA DING COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE 468 MANAGEMENT PLAN - A request by the County for City approval of the plan for the monitoring, handling, reduction, treatment, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste materials in San Bernardino County in conformance with Ae 2948 (Tanner(. RESOLUTION NO. 89-234 537 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SAN HERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOVS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN CONFORMANCE WITH AB294B Iannncn) G. PVBL IC HBARI NGS The following itsu have no legal publication er posting requirements. The Cbair will opno !bs nesting to receive public Lestiwny. 1. REPORT ON NOTICE OF INTENT 20N OF THE CITY OF A.NC~IQ 539 CVCAMONCA TO ADOPT A SOL TION OP N CERTAIN FEar. pROPERTY ~ ATHD IN TMB ITY OP Ax un CVCAMONGA ASSESSOR P CEL NO 0225-131-16 I PROPERTY - Purchase of a parcel totaling 15.145 acres to f I I ~ wnc Lude the acqu ie icion of ol.l4S ac ree for a community park in the northeast portion of the community. f-~~. e% w, _! ', PAGE City Council Agend May 17, 19H 11 RESOLUTION NO. H9-235 540 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PVHLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATfiD IN THE CITY OF RANCHO I COCAMONGA ANO HARING FINDINGS IN SVPPORT ^. HEREOF i 2. ORDER TO OONSTRUCT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 10005. 10095 SSO 10081 10075 AND 10049 ARROW ROllTE FOR THE ARROW ROUTE WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE - public Hearing of protests regarding order to Construct Public Improvements at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 and 10049 Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Improvements along Arrow Route frontage of property). RESOLUTION NO. H9-236 553 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTROCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 10005, 10095, 10001, 10075 AND 10049 ARROW ROUTE, APN 209-041-09, 18, 22, AND 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTIONS 5870 THROUGH SB80 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 3. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE PUBLIC A1GHT-OP-WAY AT 558 10005. 10095. 10081 10075 ANO 10049 ARROW ROUTE FOR THE ARROW ROUTE WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN ARCHIB D AVENUE ND HEAMOSA AVENVE - Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain ect ion to acquire public right-of-way for the Arrow Route widening project between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue at the property locete0 at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 end 10049 Arrow Route (APN 209-041- 18, -09, -22 and -31) for the construct Lon of street improvements across the Arrow Route frontage of said i i i i procezty. i ccn RESOLUTION NO. 89-237 "" A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANO HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ..' . ~: PAGE City Council Agend May 17, 198 32 4. ORDER TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 10025 ARROW 565 ROUTE VAC LOT FOR OW U NING PRO.TH EETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE - Public Hearing of protests regarding Order to Conatru ct Public Improvements at 10025 Arrow Route, a vacant lot, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Improvements along Arrow Route frcntage of property). RESOLUTION NO. 89-238 567 A FIHSOLUTZON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 10025 I ARROW ROUTE, A VACANT LOT, APN'S 209-041-32, -33 AND -34, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOA STREETS AND HIGNWAYS, SECTIONS 5870 THROUGH SEHO MORE COMMONLY KNOW AS CHAPTER 27 OF THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 5. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACOUYAE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 513 0025 W OU E A V C T ARROW OU W DENIN P BETWE N AAC AVENU AND HEAMOSA AVENUE - Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire public right-oE-way for the Arrow Route Widening Project between Archibald Avenue end Heimoaa Avenue at the property located at 10025 AYYOW nUYCe, a vacan[ lo[, (gPN'e LU9-UYl-lL, -!! and -!9) fOI the covet tact ion of street improvements across the Arrow Route frontage Of said property). RESOLUTION NO. 89-239 574 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUELIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OP CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY INGS IN N I 4 SUPPORT O 1 1 1 1 1 MANAOER'S CITY STACI' ~PQRTS 1 I The following Rasa do not legally require asp public teatiaony, although the Chair up open the saatiag for public input. 1. c1T cob c N o w 577 WITH VAA;OUS COMMISSIONS AND OTNBR AGENCIES (Wright) Continued tros March 15, 1989 seating. PAGE City Council Agend Nay 17, 198 13 2. GROWTH MANAGEMENT - Znit ial echedu le for the 13-pc int 5~8 work program related to the management of growth in Rancho Cucamonga. Continued from April 5, 1989 ~eetiag. 3. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY DESIGN FOA A THREE ACRE PARR 584 LOCATED ON ALTA CUESTA DRIVE SOUTH OP BASE LINE ROAD IN THE RED HILL AREA - Conmunity redesign of a three acre I Neighborhood Park that was previously approved under the name creekaide Park. 6. CONSIDEPATIOti OP RESOLUTIONS HARING FINDINGS ON PETITION 589 HARING A NT D APPROVING AGREEMENTS IN PROI%OSED ASSESS NT 0 89 1 HI N A ARROW RESOLUTION NO. 89-P70 I 592 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 1 OF RANCHO CllCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HARING APPOINTMENTS AND APPROVING AGREEMENTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AESOLVTION NO. 89-241 594 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, HARING FZND INGS ON PBTITION I. COVNCIL BU9INE99 Tae following ilea have been requested by CAC Citp Council for diaeusaion. Thep are not public Rearing 1USa, although the cba it eay open the ~eetiag for public input. 1. DISCVSSION OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOA CENTRAL PARR 635 (Stout) 636 2. DISCVSSION ON ESTABLISHING TRANSITION TASK FORCE FOR FIRE DISTRICT CONSOLIDATION (Stout) 3. UPDATE REPORT FROM RECYCLING SVB-COMMITTEE (Oral Report) i i I ~ 1Erown) 4. CONSIDERATION OF FOIIMATION OF AN ENV IAONMENTAL RESOURCE RECOVERY COMMITTEE 5. C,~ NS TION OF ZN N C N 637 COMMUNITY FOCNDATION EOARD OF DIRECTORS . .1. ~;. PAGE City Council Agend May 17, 198 14 S IDR7TIlICATION 01 ITO18 MR NNTT IBE'rIM6 Thin it tae tirr for City Comeil to idrntify ihr it MS they wish to ditcusa si Lae next rrrtiag. Thrsr tint will not br discussed at this renting, only identified for Las next resting. R. COIOIUNICATSONB lROM TH6 pVBLIC Thi• i• tar tirr and place for thr grnrral public to addrer• the CSLp Comeil. Ntatr law prohiDib for Citp Council fror addrriting rnp issue not prrvioutlp iacludrd on thr Agrnda. Tae City Comeil rap reeaivr Laatiroay rnd art tar rater for a subtequeat carting. Couanta err to be liribd to fivr rinutrs prr individual. L. AGTOVRNI¢Mr ~ I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of tae City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda war posted on May 12, 1989, seventy-two (72~ hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 9320- i ~ i i i C Baee Line Road. ~::v r_ W,, .l `, April 5, 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES Special Workshop A. CALL TO ORDER A special workshop of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, Aptil 5, 1989, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Baee Line Road, Aancho Cucamonga, cal ifornia. The workshop was called to order at fi:JS p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembere: William J. Alexander, D¢borah N. EYOWn, Charles J. Buquet II (arrived at 6:15 p.m.)r and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Lintla Deniele, Deputy City Managet; Beverly A. Aut heist, City Cletk; and Jame Markman, City Attorney. Absent was Count ilmember: Pamela J. Wright B. NOREBHOP ITEM B1. WORKENOP DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED CO.MMUN ITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS FOR ETIWANDA Y.I GHLANDS TRACTS (CARYN COMPANYI. Jerry Fvlwood, Deputy City Manager, preeented a report on the Communit iee Facilit iea District. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, outlined the bounder Lee of the District, stet ing we were only talking about 700 units. On April 19, staff will bring reap lotions for approval which will form the Community Fac ilitiee District. Ne stated if staff doeen't move forward by April 19, then we will not be able to get the 131 unite that are now under construction on the tax roles. He went over the major issues, the possible aaeeeemente and lazes, the 1.ea tax rate ceiling, *_he ±otel ~_..__ ___.._ the District eperst ion and msintenance tests, and tF.e l andacape costs.^ He ended the report by elating staff has been very conservative in Lte set imates. Joe DiIOrio, representing the Caryn Project, went over some of their major concerns. City Council Workshop Ninutee April 5, 1989 Page 2 Jack Lam, City Nanager, stated the purpose of the meeting was an informational one only because this was eo complex with eo many variables, staff felt that a workshop briefing would be necessary prior to formal consideration. Neyor Stout stated that if there were still points of contention when staff brought the item back, chat these De listed aide by aide. Staff concurred. R R R # R # C. COMNUNI CATIONS FROM TRS PUBLIC There were none. R R x # R # D. ADJ0VWB03tPP Mayor stout declared the workshop adjourned at 7:01 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Revnrly A. Anthelat City Clerk Approved: April 5, 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reou lar Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wedne allay, April 5, 1989, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Stout. Present were Councilmembere: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Char lee J. euquet II, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayot Bennie L. Stout Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Beverly Authe let, City Clerk; Ru Beall Maguire, City Engineer; Bill Silva, Deputy City Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer; Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Pianner; Dan Coleman, Senior Pianner; and Joe Schuit z, Commu ni Cy Services Manager. R. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of Proclamations to participants in "Quake Shake 89". B2. Preee nt at ion of Proclamation de aignating April ae Recycling Month. B3. Councilman Buquet requested Item H10, Consideration of Sunnort of Fontana/Caltrane Lit ieation, be moved up ei.nce people were present foc the item. ed. Jack I~am, City Manager, reque eted that Co neent Calendar Item C17 be removed from the Consent Calendar, and stated that in Consent Calendar Item C10 there were corrections in the Resolution which were before Council. x x x x x s C. CONSHNT CALENBAR C1. Approval of Minutes: February 15, 1939, March 1, 1989, and March 4, 1939. C2. Approval of Warrant a, Register No'e 3/15/39, 3/22/89, 3/29/39 and Payroll ending 3/16/89 for the total amount of $3,577,203.00. City Council Minutee April 5, 1989 Page 2 C3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedules ae of March 30, 1989. C6. Alcoho lic Beverage Application for On Sale General Eating Place, 1988 Conditional, Ptiorlty /30, for Fel ipe•e, Alma V. and Felipe De La Piedra, 8017 Archibald Avenue. C8. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General, 1988 Conditional, Priority i}31r for Arrow Plaza Market, Peer S. Dejager, 9755 Arrow Highway, A, B, and C. Cti. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer and Wino Eating Place for Chuck E. Cheese's, Showbiz Pizza Time, Incorporated, 9339 Foothill Boulevard, Suite E. C7. Approval to destroy Building and Safety records which are obsolete and no longer required which ie consistent with State law. RESOLUTION NO. 89-112 A RESOLUTICN OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDB AND DOCVI~NTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 Ce. Approval to allow credit or reimbursement for System Development Feee for Tracts 12952 and 13428 (G lenfed), State Route 30 east of Haven Avenue, for rnnal.n n~<nn of vomcnta nn Cfwro Rnnro in aw mtl reA anA nMcreA hv_ CALTRAN S. COUNCILMANnBVQVBT REQV68TED ITEM C8 BB RBMOVBD FOR DISCUSSION. AESOLOTION NO. B9-113 A REGOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALi FORM A, APPROVING A CREDIT AGAINST OR REIMBURSEMENT FROM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR TRACTS 12952 AND 13428 (GLENFED) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ON STATE ROUTE 30 EAST OF HAVEN AVENUfi AS REQUIRED AND ORDERED BY CALTRANS C9. Approval to authorize the advertleing of the "Notice Inviting Bide" for Sierra Madre Avenue and Placida Court Street Improvement Project, between Arrow Highway and Via Carrillo Drive, to be funded from CD BG iunde Account 28-<333- RESOLUTION NO. 89-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THfi CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIP ICATIONS FOR THE "SIERRA HAORE AVENUE AND PLACIDA COURT STREET IMPROVEMENT City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 3 PROJECT, BETWEEN ARROW HIGHWAY AND VIA CARILLO DRIVE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTS SE TO AECEIVB BIDS C10. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Red Hill Park Drainage Project, to be funded from the Capital Reserve Account No. 25-42E5-7043. Capital expenditure budgeted F.Y. 1988/89 Engineering/Maintenance C & H budget. RESOLUTION NU. 89-115 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RED HILL PARE DRAINAGE PROJECT", iN SAID CITY AND AUTHOAIEING AND DIRFCTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C11. Approval to deny Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Hap 11780 -KOrnblatt - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denying a eubdivieion of 1.01 acres of land into 2 parts le in the Very Low Ree idential District (lees than 2 dwelling unite per acre), located on the northeast corner of Almond and Mai Streets - APN 201-071-88. RESOLUTION NO. 89-116 A REEOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING TENTATIVE PAACHL MAP NO. 11780, A PFOIIF.Rm Tn RIIRMVIOF. 1 .n1 AlIAP.R nF T.A Nn TNTf1 TWO iAT.S TN THF. VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PEA ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ALMOND STREET AND MAI STREET, AND MAKING FIND INGH IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 201- 071-55 Approval to deny Hnvironmental Aeeeeement and Variance 88-15 - Kornblatt -Appeal of the Planning Commieeion's decision denying a request to reduce the average lot size from 22,500 square Eeet to 21,954 square feet on two lots within the Very Low Residential District (lase than 2 dwelling unite per acre), located on the northeast corner of Almond and Mai Streets - APN 201-071-55. RESOLUTION N0. 89-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO -UCAHONGA. CALi FORMER. DENk'i NG VARIANCE N0. 88-i5 20 REDUCE THE REQUIRED AVERAGE LOT SIZE FROM 22,500 SQUARE FEET TO 21r952 SQUARE FEET FOA TWO LOTS WITHIN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ALMO!]D STREET AND MAI STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 201-071- 55 City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 4 cit. Approval to execute agreement (CO 89-049) with David Taueeig and Associates, Sncorpozated to provide an evaluation and update to the draft Fieeal impact report prepared for the 8tiwanda North Landowner's Consortium by Stanley R. Hoffman Associates for a fee of $15,000.00 and approval to execute agreement (co 89-054) with Empire Economics to deternine product types and market ab eorpt ion for Etiwanda North for a fee of $12,000.00. The coat will be funded from Account 33-4130-6028 and reimbursed upon formation to CPD 88-2. C13. Approval to award and execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 89-055) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and J.F. Davidson Aeaociatee for the preparation of Design Plane, Contract Specifications and Engineer's Estimates for Watershed Atea XII, Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain from Vincent Avenue to + 1100' east thereof. The not to exceed fee of $13,420.00 will be funded by the Assessment District No. 82-1R Punds, Account No. 83-4637-6028. C19. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement (CO 89-056) for Vnderyrounding of Overhead Utilities, for DR 87-22, 9345 Santa Anita Avenue, aubmitt ed by Rancho Cucamonga East Associates. RESOLVTION NO. 89-128 A REEOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBVRSEMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTED ON MARCH 13, 1989 BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA EAST ASSOCIATES FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF OVEAMEAD UTILITIES ON SANTA ANNTA AVfiNVE C15. Approval to award the purchase of the fabrication and delivery of r.. ~.Fa~f naA n.-nva nod matvni al fnn Vin nd -vanna at the -h nhiann Tnro4a and Santa Fe Railway Company Crossing north of 8th 5t rest, to the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company for the fee of $21,894.30 ($2 G, 655.00 plus fig California State Tax) to be funded from Systems Development Account No. 22-463'7-8850. C16. Approval to award the Baee Line Road Parkway Beautification Improvement Project from the Weet City Limits to Carnelian Street to ..a~away Construction, Incorporatetl, for the amount oP $93,599.00, to be fundetl with Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-8793. 4 2:-Ab4~-8v:6~ ITEM REMOVED PROM AGENDA. C Apps uvai ut Map, axe uution of improvement Ayreement, improvement 6euurity and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Dlet rict Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract 13542, located east of Chaffey College between Wilson Avenue snd Banyan Serest, submitted by Grlgeby Dave lopmentr Incorporated. City Council Minutes Apx it 5, 1989 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 89-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL HAP OF TRACT NO. 13542 RESOLUTION NO. 89-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2 FOR TRACT 13542 C19. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 find Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract 13542-3, located east of Chaffey College between Wilson Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Grigsby Development, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 89-121 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITYr AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13542-3 RESOLUTION NO. 89-122 D 9FCM ftTThN AF THE !'TTV PDInI(`TT. (1F THE OTTY f1F RA Nf HO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEEATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 POR TRACT 13542-3 C20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for DA 87-42, located on the north e ids of civic Center Drive between Red Oak end Utlce Streets, submitted by Empire Partners. AESOLVTION NO. 89-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND iMPRO J-eM-e NT SECURiIF FOR D-e JEiAPM-eHI REVi6ii RG. 8i-r2 RESOLUTION NO. 89-124 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNB CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNSXAT ION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTSNANC6 DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 POR DA 87-62 City Council Minutes Aptil 5, 1989 Page 6 C21. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noa. 1 and 6 for DR 87-44, located on the southeast corner of Civic Centex Drive and Haven Avenue, submitted by Haven Center Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 89-125 A RESOLUTION OF THR CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITX OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CAL: FORMA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DHVELOPMENT AE VIEW NO. 87-44 RESOLUTION NO. 89-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTHNANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND BTREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND fi POA DA 87-dd C22. Approval to modify City Council Resolution No. 88-413 RESOLUTION NO. 88-413A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ABSOLUTION 88-413 C23. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and nrdurinn fha Annwra+inn rn Ta ndwmro Nai ntananca Ai atr<nt Nn. 1 and Rt rant Lighting Maintenance District Noa. 1 and 2 for Tract 13823, located on the south aide of Lemon Avenue, east o£ Haven Avenue, submitted by Alia Loma/D.K. Joint Venture. RESOLUTION N0. 89-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND PINAL MAP OF TRACT NO 13823 RESOLUTION NO. 89-128 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OROERItiG THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN . ~....iTORY TO L ..ESCAPE NAIHTEtiA:iCE DiSTRTCT IiO. i AtiD SSHEET LIGHTING MAINTENANC£ DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13823 C24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security Eor Parcel Map 9350, located on the northeeet corner of Base Llne Road and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The Wli Liam Lyon Company. City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 7 RESOLUTION N0. 89-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR PARCEL MAP 9350 C28. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 11341, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes of cal ifornla. RESOLUTION NO. 89-130 A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFOANIAr APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11341 C26. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13273, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive submitted by Lewis Homes of California. RESOLUTION NO. 89-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT BECORITY FOR TPACT 13273 C27. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DA gq_nq tnnnT Od hoT woon 9Th anA 0.Th CT rooTa. oa oT of Hol lman Avonn o. auhmiTT ad by Golden West Equity Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 89-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY FOA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88-D8 C28. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Monument aticn cash deposit Eor Tract 13443, located in the Victoria Planned Community, submitted by Republic Development Company and release of previously submitted improvement Agreement Security and Monumentation deposit accepted by City Council on November 4, 1987, from The William Lyon Company. AESOLUTLON NO. B9-i33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFOANIA, APPROVING IMPAOVENEN'T AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13443 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 4, 1987 City Council Minutes April 5r 1989 Page 8 C29. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security end Monument ation cash depoe it £or Tract 13440, located at the northeast corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Development and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement Security and Monumentat ion deposit accepted by Ciiy Council on December 16, 1987, from The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION I70. 89-i34 A AESULUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRE&MENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 1344D AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEl~NT AND SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED EY CITY COVNCIL ON DECEMBER 36, 1987 C30. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Monument at ion cash depoe it and annexation of work proyram areas to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract 11606-1, located east of Mango Street, south of Victoria Street, submitted by E1 Capit an Development Company, Incorporated and release of previously euDmitted Imprcvement Agreement Security and Monument ation depoe it accepted Dy City Council on December 5, 1984, from earcl aye - TAC Developers. RESOLUTION NO. 89-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POA TRACT 11606-1 AND RELEASING THE TYp-MRMPNT -I:9 PPMPNT -Nn CPI.IIpTTV p9 P,IT /~IICT V -/'!'P pTPn pV ,.TTV COVNCZL ON DECEMBER 5, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 89-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 11606-1 C31. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Elm Avenue between church street and spruce Avenue, euDmitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 89-137 A A-cSOLUiivN OF IHE CIZ"Y v`OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ELM STREET BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND SPRUCE AVENUE C32. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Eztene ion for Tract 12870 and Tract 12870 Storm Drain, located on Che north aide of Highland Avenue between East Avenue and Etlwanda Avenue, eubm Ltted Dy Daly Homes. City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 89-138 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEM%NT EXTSNSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 AND TRACT 12870 STORM DRAIK C 33. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 11932, located on the northwest corner of 8antlola Street and Finch Avenue, submitted by C.T.R. Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 89-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI£OAN IA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11932 C34. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13275, located on the north aide of Highland Avenue east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Oxfozd Development. AESOLUT ION N0. 89-140 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCHG CUCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13275 nvw Onn.mrot hn vcnnro imnnnvomon~ Anroemnn~ Fvf wnwi nn far Taw rf 19909, located on the eouthweet corner of Almond Street and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Nordic Woods II. RESOLUTION N0. 89-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12902 C36. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extensions for Tract Noe. 12643, 13555, 13556, 13657, 13558, 13559, 13560, 13561, 13562, 13563, and Parcel Map 9192 located on the nark Awe et corner of Highland Avenue and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development. RESO:.uro~. No. a9-1»2 A REHOLUT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 12643 City Council Minuiee April 5, 1989 Page 10 RESOLUTION N0. 89-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 1MPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 13555 RESOLVTION NO. 89-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 13556 RESOLUTION NO. 89-145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13557 AESOLVTION NO. 89-146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIPORNIA, APPROVING INPAOVENENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13558 RESOLUTION NO. 89-147 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO rnravnvra rm ~nnnura avvunvrur. runnrnrcunum annnnunum E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13559 RESOLUTION NO. 89-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI~^vr.A. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13560 RESOLUTION NO. H9-149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPRGVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 135fi1 RESOLUTION Nv. o9-iSU A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION RND IMPROVBMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13562 City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 11 RESOLUTION NO. 89-151 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 13563 RESOLUTION NO. 89-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR PARCEL MAP 9192 C37. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12671 'Traffic Signal, located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Baee Line Road, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 89-153 A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12671 TAAPFIC SIGNAL C3&. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds, and file Notice of Completion for: CUP 86-02 Located on the Northwe et Corner of 19th Street and eervl Street Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $13,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 96-02 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORN CUP 87-19 Located on the West Sitle of Jaecer Street Between Lomita Drive and Sierra Vista Street Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $13,000.00 Letter of Credit RESOLUTION NO. B9-155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 87-19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR THE WOAA City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 12 C39. Approval to replace the Paithful Performance Bond with a Maintenance Bond as the guarantee for the Red Hill Park Maintenance Building. C40. Approval to replace the Faithful Performance Bond with a Maintenance Bond as the guarantee £or the Victoria White Alder Tree Replacement. C41. Approval to urge 5t ate Water Resource Control Board to revise its Draft Rennrr. RESOLUTION NO. 89-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO REVISE ITS BRAFT REPORT ENTITLED "WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLAN FOA SALINITY SAN FRANC IECO BAY/SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ESTUARY" MOTION: Movetl by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve the amended Conaer~t Calendar. Motion carried anon imouely, 5-D. R f 1 1 1 1 DSSCUSSION OP ITEM CS. Approval to allow credit or reimDU rsement for System Development Fee6 for Tracts 12952 and 13425 (Glenfed), State Route 30 east of Haven Avenue, for construction of improvements on State Route 30 ae required and ordered by CALTRANS. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CREDIT AGAINST OR REIMBURSEMENT FROM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR TRACTS 12952 AND 13425 (GLENFED) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ON STATE ROUTE 30 EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE AS REQUIRED AND ORDERED BY CALTRANS Councilman Buquet stated he pulled the item because there hoe been considerable d iecuesion with the Public Safety Commission with et off working with CALTRANS On the matter. Because of the realignment of 19th Street and Highland Avenue, we have run into a problem with the vacation of Highland Avenue, and have created some concerns by the residents who have indicated inadequate notice by the Developee of the property and not a full underetantling ae to what was going ono nr n,w ~nnnarns was the addwndum to the ou rchaae acreemente which made reference to the extension of the 210 freeway through Highland. Another concern was a map which was provided by the homeowners showing 19th Street going up into Highland; however, it shows Highland ae going coot inuoue weer to Haven Avenue, and doesn't show it ae being closed dawn. Eny ineerin9 hoe been working with CALTRANS in an effort to reopen Highland to Haven, which hoe created some problems at the Glenfed project. It ie hie underetantling we ere trying to reopen Highland with a hutton-down design to tie City Council Hinutes April 5, 1989 Paqe 13 into 19th Street. With General Plan Amendment, and working with CALTRANS to reconfigure Highlanfl as it was previously. Ke was concerned because we were allcwing reimbursement for system development fees for work which has been done according to CALTRANS' requirement e. xe Eelt we should be diligent in moving forward eo CALTAANS doesn't end up getting a eituat ion where it stays ae it ie now. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, responded that the reeo lotion tonight dose not have anything to do with credits or reimbursement for any work to date. xe further stated that la et evening the Public Safety Cwmnies ion action was threefold. The first was recognizing that CALTRANS' desire was to order Glenfed to comply with their original permit, which was to have Highland open to 19th Street. He et ated et of f'e concern was Glenfed would ree Set and enter into litigation and draw the process out. If there was a four-way control at that intersection, we would recommend to the Public Safety Commission and City Council to allow credits; that work could be done in a 4-8 week period. The second type of work suggested would take a full General Plan Amendment procedure which would be en a-12 month process. The Public Safety Commission stated to do the first, prOCBed with a General Plan Amendment, and pursue with CALTRANE all the options. The third was to pursue with development and other Capital Projects in the area, each ae opening of Milliken, Banyan and extension of Lemon, etc. This item tonight ie simply to allow credit if CALTRANS orders Glenfed to reopen the Highland connection, and only if that connection includes Eu 11 control atop at the Highland connection. Mayor Stout stated we shoo ld look into the addendums io the purchase agreement notices because they nre totally inadequate, and felt our attorney should draft n nrl ate nntire that tells Yheae nennle the Truth about what to qo inq on,aandnauggest that the people selling these houses use our notice instead. Cour.c ilman Buquet stated this eituat ion points out, and this has Deen raised pr ay lovely at a Council meeting, the reason why we should require a major infra- structure re-routing and street constructions to be done prior to Che occupancy phase of housing tracts adjacent to these areas. He Felt there needed to be some work done by Council to improve our goals and communications in this regard. rnunr,ilwoman Brown stated that a few months ago when Council wanted all buyers to be aware the Rock Crusher plant might go in above Highland, we had the Planning Commission work with staff Ln drafting a letter th® people had to sign eo they knew such a plant might be going in. She felt we needed to do this again for other major infra-structures. Sha further stated we needed Co inform the pcoGie reaardiaa the R.,cn Crasher Giant, that it indeed was gcirq to qo iG. councilman Euquet stated he would like to see some of the residents Lncluded In the meetings hetween our eng losers and cALTRANS. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council were City Council Hinutea April 5, 1989 Page 14 Karen Speaks, after addressing several comments made by Auseell Maguire, City Engineer, stated their main objection stems from the lack of planning and the cone iderat ion of the safety of the citizens who are being forced tc util its the new east/west arterial prematurely. What they were aaking was far Council to seriously recone ider the opening of Highland Avenue in the manner the concerned citizens were requesting in the documents she presented, and for Council to carefully review the documents to assess whether their request was a valid one. She also asked that before Council made their decision, they go out to 19th Street, specifically to the San Benito intersection, and try to make several attempts to exit that intersection and proceed westerly through the intersection. Cathy Vendara, expressed concern regarding the Planning Commission and the lack of concern fnr the reeidente at the 19th and Highland area. Kevin Eggleston, stated the reeidente simply wanted Highland put back the way it was. There being no further input, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to continue the item to the April 19, 1989 Council meeting. Hot ion carried unanimovaly, 5-0. R : • • • 1 (Council heard item H10 at thin point sn the agenda, however, the minutes will remain in printed agenda Eorm~. R R• 1 R M D. CONSANT OADI NANCEB No Items Submitted. k k # R # h 6. ADVERTISED PUBLIC BEAR3NOS E1. VACA?ION OF A PORTION OF ALMOND AVENUP. - CARYN COMPANY -A request to vacate a portion of Almond Avenue, located south of 24th Street and west of Cherry Avenue in the Et iwanda area, approximately 23 feet wide and 1,812 feet long - APN 226-111-01. Continued froe March 18, 1989. Staff report presented uv irn if Sticknev, Associate Civ ii -cuuineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 89-157 A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO 8E VACATED A PORTION OP City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 15 ALMOND AVENUE, LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET AND WEST OP CHERRY AVENUE, IN ETIWANDA AREA, APPROXIMATELY 23 FEET WIDfi AND 1,812 FEET LONG - APN 226-111-01 MOTIN: Moved by Buquet, seconded Dy Brown to approve Reeolut ion No. 89-157. Motion carried Unanimously, 5-O. • + + w ~ E2. VACATION OF JUNEBERRY DRIVE - FONTANA STEEL, INC. - A ieque et to vacate Juneberry Drive, located south of Arrow Route and west of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 60 feet wide and 71D feet long - APN 229-121-35. Continued Sroe March 15, 1989. Staff report wav prevented by Walt 5t ickney, Associate Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting far public hearing. There being no reeponve, the public hearing was closed. RESOLOT ION NO. 69-358 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCHO CUCANONGA, CALI PORN IA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED JUNSBEAAY DANE, LOCATED SOUTH OF ARROW ROVTE AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENVE, APPAO%IMATELY 60 PBET WIDE AND 710 FEET LONG -APN 229-121-35 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 89- 158 ordering Juneberry Drive to be vacated. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. R x F. PUBLIC BEARINGS No Items Submitted. O. CITY MANAOBR'6 STAPP REPORTS G1, GROWTH MANAGEMENT - A follow-up discuss ion on the items discus eed at the Glty Council's March 4, 1989 workshop. Continued froze Narch 15, 1989. Staff report presented by Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner. Items discussed were phae ing of infrastructure in the planned cammunit iee. Jack Lam. City Man seer, stet ed the Planned oommunit iee were terueted becdu 8e when you are doing infrastructure phae ing, it iv moat effective with the planned common it iee 6ecauee they are currently doing construction, and they have large acreages that can be phased. Moat of the areas of the City have small pieces here and there, making phasing dif Elcult. By separating conceptual planning, which ie not ae effective ae planned community phasing, we can get a more immediate effect with phasing of planned community infrastructure. City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 16 Councilwoman Brown stated she had ihie item brought up because it is imperative we phase-in some of the infrastructure eo people can get out of the east end of town. Presently there ie only Haven and the I-15, with traffic on Base Line backing up to Rochester in the mornings just to get on the freeway. councilman Buquet expre seed disagreement with that. He said there has been a growth management plan in place since 1979, and with the two planned cononunitiee the r= was phasing-in of infrastructure with those two projects. He felt we needed to enhance the trigger mechanism. He said there have been things that have complicated the process, such ae the selling off of apart of Victoria, and presently the William .yon Company ham a problem at Highland Avenue with the Milliken connection because of problems with CALTItANS, because CALTRANS has not yet approved the tie-in. Nayor Stout stated he ag teed with Councilman Huguet that there was a phase-in plan eetabl iehed, but he also agreed with Councilwoman Brown in that we have not been as aucceneful as we should have been with it. Councilwoman Wright stated the question was not whether this should be included with the planned conmiunltiee, o6viouely it is. She felt the question was are we really going to be able to impact the problem if we just touch the planned communit iee, if we don't try to include some of these other large percale in the community so that the infrastructure will be developed th=oughout the entire City. A discussion regarding parka and recreation. _ c_ _, «.,n «no.o mudnd t., hn Home r.r icoerinc mechanism added far community facilities with standards set by population. He also asked that the Park and Recreation Cnmmisa ion put together a plan foz ihie and that other things, such as library parking at the facilities, be included. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated what staff needed was general coneenaue on the direction Councll wished now that the list has been pretty well decided, then staff would develop individual components and come back to Council with spec if is ecopin9 and timing of those items. Mayor Stout stated the City Manager could coordinate that. tIe xou ld not like to see this come back piecemeal. Councilwoman Brown euggeeted that a sub-committee of the City Council sit down to work on these etantlards. Councilman Buquet euggeeted this be included with the Coale sees ion workshop that has been planned. ACTION: Jack Lam, city Manager, euggeeted that since they agree on ihs i[eme which should be included, then eta Ef could briny back a report as to who is going to do what, when it ie going to be done, and Council can review and see if they are eatlefied with that action plan. City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 17 Councilwoman Brown stated she would like to aee some of the other Commiaeione have a part in this process also. . r ~ . . x G2. REPORT ON WATER CONBSRVAT ION IN LANDSCAPES (Alexander) Continued f[o~ March 15, 1989. Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Senior Planner. Both Jaime Foot and George Blanchard trom the Cucamonga County Water District were present to answer questions of Council. ACTION: Council directed et off to proceed in drafting a xeriacape ordinance. G3. REPORT ON PARR WATCM PROGRAM (Brown) Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager. Joe Schultz, Community 5ervicea Managerr suggested that staff come back to Council with a program for their perusal and approval. Council directed staff to run the program 6y the Park and ftecreat ion Commiaeion f irat. Councilman august felt this was more of a crime program and ~aou ld require a ewo- prong approach; one from the Parka and Recreation Department, and one from the Sheriff's Department. Cnu nc iluoman Wright expressed this should be directed to the City Manager to resolve how to accomplish this. Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager, stated the focus of the program would be on coordination, cooperation and eJUCat ion. ACTION: Staff to come back with a report. R. COUNCTL BVBIN688 H1. COALS AND OBJECTIVES/TEAM BUILDING WOAESHOP STATUS REPORT. (Wright) Cfaff r_ ___ i___onlnd F/ .T3rY T.a T~ !'Ify Man3ge_*. ACTION: Proposal to include in the budget work program for implementation in the summer. Council directed they wanted to aee this done every six months. F{2. STA1'VS REPORT ON PROVIDING COUNCIL AND COMMIES ION MINVTEE TO THE LIBRARY. (Brown) Staff report presented by Beverly Authelet, City Clerk. City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 18 ACTION: Report was received and filed, with a follow-up in six months to see if all minutes were being forwarded to the library. R R R f R R R3. REPORT RECOHM"ND ING PARTICIPATION IN THS SAN EERNAROINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT "WORK RELEASE PROGRAM" (Stout) Staff report presented by Rueeell Maguire, City Engineer. ACTION: Council requested a progress report after the program had Deen in effect. R a R R. R H4. REPORT ON CONSTRUCTION CON1'AOL AND COORDINATION PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT ~O PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (BUquet) ACTION: Item was deferred to next meeting. • R R R R R H8. REPORT REGARDING TAAPFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS IN RELATION TO HAVEN MEDIAN ISLAND CONTRACT MAINTENANCE (BUquet) Staff report presented by Rueeell Maguire, City Engineer. nudceseiuy ..~Ly .;uu..~i. nee. Debbie Eggleetonr who stated she felt something needed to be done in closing off Haven to only one lane. ACTION: Council directed staff to prepare a progress report and mitlgat ion procedures on the master. R R R R R R H6. REPORT ON 1989 CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMISSION QUARTERLY MEETING - City Council Advisory commission Sub-committee's recommendations of projects for the CAC to pursue for 1989. Staff report presented by William Alexander, City Councilman. .,.....,~.. ..epos _~ccivcd -n3 .sled. Councilman Buquet suggested that the Citi¢en'e Advisory Commission look at the water conserver ion Item. Councilwoman grown suggested they also look at the recycling issue R R R R R City Council Minutes April 5, 19 R9 Page 19 H7. STATVe AEpOAT OF ARCHIBALD STORM DRAIN PND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS FOR THS NORTHWEST CORNER OP ARCHIBALD AND 4TH STREET. (Alexander) Staff report presented by Bill Silva, Deputy City Engineer. ACTION: Report was received and filed. • ~ ~ : x Mayor Stout called a recess at 11:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11:55 p.m. with all mambere of Council present. r ., • x . : H8. DISCUSSION OF COUNCIL COMPENSATION. (Alexander) Staff report presented by William Alexander, Councilman. After soma discussion, the following motion was made: MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Stout to direct at afE to draft an ordinance to adjust compensation to $500.00 per month beginning at the seating of the 1990 Council. Motion failed by the following vote: AYES: Alexander, Stout NOES: Buquet, Brown, Wright x w ACTION: Sub-comanittee consisted of William Alexander and Charles J. Auquet II, with information to be reported back to Council. + • ~ „__, rn_vcrn_RRATION OF SUPPORT OF FONTANA CALTAANS LITIGATION. (Baguet) Ru esell Carlson, Public Proj sets Director £or the City of Fontana, presented hie report requesting the City Council to support them with their litigation with CALTRANS. Councilman Baguet felt staff should explore th Le to see how it could affect Rancho Cucamonga. ..........__..,...._.. ___.... expree Bed we ahnp id use nur coiiective clout w1Lh organizations such ^ae SANEAG, etc. ACTION: Council directed the City Manager to talk with Fontana'e City Manager to find out how we could help. ~ . ~ r . I. TI N O! I F ZT N3 City Council Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 20 I1. Councilmen Alexander requested we look at alternative work schedules. I2. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated we needed to set a date for a joint meeting with the Foothill Fire Protection District and the City Council regarding the consolidation. Council concurred in setting Thursday, April 27, at 7:00 p.m. 13. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated we needed to set some budges workshops. Council concurred with Thursday, June 8, at 6:00 p.m., and Thursday, lone 15, at 6:00 p.m., with staff bringing in food. • f F • k J. CONNUNIGT%DN6 IROM T8S PVBI.IC Jl. Kevin &ggleeton, addressed Council with the following items: 1. Xaven Avenue, he felt we should take out all the grass. 2. Consider an ordinance ending meetings at 11:00 p.m. 3. Put "COmmunicatione From the Public" at the beginning of the agenda. 4. fiuggeeted their aalazy savings which they voted down this evening be allocated to another project. 5. Requested etaf E'a time and coat Eor the recycling project. 6. Admonished Council that they needed to be hone et with the publicr that items such ae the Growth Management program and Park Watch program had not been approved, although information hoe gone out stating it had. • w r, x • ~ R. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Bu qu et, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 12:30 a,m. Aeepectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelat city Clark Approved: ~ April 19, 1989 CITY OF AANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINOTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cv camonga met on Wednesday, April 19, 1989, in the Lions Park Co;mnunity Center, 9161 Baee Line Aoad, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Tne meeting was called to order at 7:40 p. m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Couneilmemb¢re: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Bev¢rly Authelet, City Clerk; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry Pulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rueaell Maguire, City Engineers Brad Buller, City Planner; W31t St iskney, Ae¢eciaie Civil Engi Weer; Niki eratt, Associate Planner; SaveYly Ntaeen, Assistant Planner; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Bruce Abbott, A eeociate Planner; Otto %routil, Deputy City Planner; and Diana O'Neal, Admin ietrat ive Analyst. w n : ~ w B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 01. Presentation of Pzoclamat ions to the Refuse Companies and the San Bernardino County Household Hazardous Waste Team for a eucceeaful Spring Clean Sweep. B2. Presentation of Proclamation far Dee ignated Driver Week. B3. Die ne solorzano, Pree ident Windrows PTA, thanked et off and the Citv Council for "Safe Route to School" program. ~ . rr s C. CON66NT CALENDAR C1. Approval of Warrants, Register No'e. 4/5/89 and 4/12/89 and Payroll ending 3/30/89 for the total amount of $2,680,616.24. C2. Approval to declare ae eurpLue equipment one Silvereed Typewriter E%-50. City Council Minutes April 19, 1989 Page 2 C3. Approval to authorize the advertie ing of the "Notice Inviting eide^ for Hilla ids Road Reconat suet ion Project, from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Street to be funded from Fund 15: SB 300 - New Account Number RESOLUTION N0. 09-159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HILLSIDH ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT", TN 9AID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERE TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting eide^ for Old Town Park Improvements to be funded from Park Development Funds Account No. 20-4532-6611 and Community Block Grant Funds. The architect's estimate for the project is $1, 010, OOO.OC. RESOLUTION NO. 69-160 A AESOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMON(:A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE OLD TOWN PARE IMPROVEMENTS ON FERON BOULEVARD, WEST OF HEAHOSA AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIE ING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CI.ERE TO ADVERTISE AND RECEIVE BIDS C5. Approval to award and execute Profeeeional Services Agreement (CO 89-061) with Linville civil Engineers, to prepare plans, epeciflcat ions and estimate for Arrow Amite RahahilitaH nn n~ninr/ fmm Door of wmm..aa e..e....e «.. for a £ee not to exceed $12,400.00, to be funded by Systems Development-Account No. 22-4637-8850. Cb. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 89-062) for inetallat ion of Puhlic Improvement and Dedication between Cucamonga County water District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements located along the north aide of 19th Street from Sapphire Street to Cucamonga Creek, for the 19th Street Project - west City Limits to Carnelian Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. E9-161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GiiGAFiviiGn, CnL .,. ... G P.N AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ANO ^DEOICATION FROM CUCAMONGA COUNTY t:ATER D. ?IC T, n.w .aJTHOAiSiNG IHn MAk"OE AND v'-3Y CLEFk To SIGN SAME• C7. APproval to execute proposal (CO 89-063) with Telecommunications Management Corporat loo, Incorporated for cable televie ion consultant services. C8. Approval to execute release of Agreement (CO 89-064) toe PoetponemenL of CC6R'9 for Tract 13444, located in the Victotla Planned Community. City Council Mlnutee April 19, 1489 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 89-162 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGAEHMENT FOA POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF CC&R'S FOR TRACT 13444 C9. Approval to execute release of Agreement (CO 89-065) for Postponement of CC&R's for Tract 13dd0 located in the Victoria Planned Community. AESOLUTI ON NO. 89-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOA POSTPONEMENT OP APPROVAL OF CC6R'S FOR TRACT 13440 C10. Approval to execute a Subordination Agreement (CO 89-066) for Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 7852, located on 13662 Victoria Avenue eubm fitted by Eugene and Bert le Brown. RESOLUTION NO. 89-164 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBOND INAT ION AGREEt4:NT FROM EUGENE AND BERTIE EROWN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERR TO SIGN SAMfi C11. Approval of Settlement Agreement (CO 89-067) by and between the Clty of panchn Cv namnnna. Rannhn (l,r amnnna Aedcval nnmcnh Anonr.. rhafin.r .+M nh nn+nn High School District, Central School District, Cucamonga School Di et ri ct, and Etiwanda School District. C12. Approval of Stipulation of Entry of Judgment (CO 89-068) for laweu it brought by Weete rn Center on Law and Poverty, Incorporated. C13. Approval to authorize the City Engineer to file and sign applrcatione end State-Local Entity Agreements with CALTRANS for Stets-Local TYan apertdt ion Demonetrat ion Progzam Fu nde (SB 140, Chapter 24 Statutes of 1988) RESOLUTION NO, 89-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER OF RANCHO ..UCAMONGA ^.. ee^ILE AivG SIGN APPiiCATiONS AND STALE-LOCAL EN i'I TY AGAEEMENTSj WITH CALTRANS FOR STATE-LOCAL TRANEPORTATION DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM FUNDS (S8 140, CHAPTER 24 STATUTES OF 1988) C14. Approval to execute Improvement Security Riders for Parcel Hap 11030 located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard end Haven Avenue, eubmitt ed by Lew fie Homes of California. City CouncLl Hinutee Aptil 19, 1989 Page 4 RESOLVTION NO. H9-166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RIDERS FOR PARCEL HAP NUMBER 11030 c16. Approval to execute Improvement Security Riders for Parcel Map 11341 located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, submit tad by Lewis Homes of California. RESOLUTION NO. 89-167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AIDEA FOR PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11341 C16. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 £or Tract 12462, located on the south aide of summit Avenue between Etiwanda and Eaet Avenues, submitted by Radnor/erougham/CUCamonga Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 89-168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12462 RESOLUTION NO. 89-169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MA INTENANCfi DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 12462 C17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension fei Tracts 10827, 10827-1, 1C927-2, and 10827-3 located on the east aide of Haven Avenue between Nilson Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Relco Industries. RESOLUTION NO. 89-170 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTEI:S SON AND SMPROVENEIiT SECURITY FOA TRACT I:OS. 12827, 12827-1, 10827-2, AND 10827-3. C18. Approval to azecute Improvement Agreement Extene ion for Parcel Map 8617, located on the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development. City Council Hinutee April 19, 1989 page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 89-171 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROV&tffiNT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVBNENT SECURITY POR PARCEL MAP 8617 C19. Approval to accept Improvement e, Releaee of sonde and File a Notice of Completion for: Traci 13353, located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 19th Street Releaee: Faithful Performance Hond (Street) $ 296,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 29,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIPORN IA, ACCEPTING THfi PUBLIC IMPROVBMENTS FOR TRACT 13353 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POA THB NOAR pR 87-52 located ai 12434 Fourih Stree! Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 210,000.00 RR.SOLnTTON Nm. R9-17i A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OA 87-52 AND AVTHOAI2I NG THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORX DR 87-28 located on the west aide of Lucas Ranch Road, south nE Sixth Street Faithful Performance Bond (Street) ~ 12,OG0.Ov RESOLUTION NO. 89-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO .uCANONGA, CALiFORHIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC iMPAv4BNENTS FOA OR E7-28 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORN Ya t 5 c d on the eo h aet corner of Haven Avenue and Boulder Canyon Road Releaee: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 248x000.00 City Council Minutes April 19, 1989 Page 6 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (street) $ 26,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12650-3 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THR WOAR DR 87-30 located on the northeast corner of Helms Avenue and Feron Boulevard - Monde and Agreements were nevez placed on City Council Agenda. However, a Permit was ieeued and all work was caopleted per Conditions of Approval and Approved Street Improvement Plane. Therefore, accept improvements end maintain cash deposit of $3,500.00 during maintenance period. RESOLUTION NO. 89-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA OR 87-30 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WOAR Tr ct 3475 c ed n th h o n o amo Av n e a d Ch St teat Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5 470,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 47,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. N9-177 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMfiNTS FOR TRACT 13475 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POA TH8 WORA 8 at on the northwest corner of Civic Cents r' and Red Oak street Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 5,600.00 R-cSOLUiION NO. B9-i70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR E6-32 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE NORR City Council Hinutee April 19, 1939 Page 7 C20. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12237-2 located on the east aide of Nermoea Avenue south of Almond Street. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 14,700.00 c21. Approval to establish a revised time schedule for regular meetings cf the Park and Recreation Commission. RESOLUTION NO. 89-179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFOPNIA, AESC IND ING RESOLUTION NO. 84-124 ANO ESTABLISHING A REVISED TIRE SCHEDULE POR REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE PARR AND RECREATION COlHfI SSI ON C22. Approval to set public hearing for June 7r 1939 - Approval for Amending Map, Tract No. 13441, located on the northeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Renyon Wfly, submitted by Grupe Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 89-180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE AMENDING HAPr TRACT 13441 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to approve the Consent r•atondn r. MnH nn as rriad nnxnimnn alv. F-O. • • • • • t D. CONSENT ORDINANCES No items Submitted. ~ R f A• R E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC BEARI NOS E1. VACATION OP AN ALLEY - MR. SEOVGAARD - located soot herly of 9th Si rest and westerly of Calaveras Avenue, approximately 20 feet wide and 157 feet long - APN 207-241-2 i. Staff report presented by Walt Btickney, Associate Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 89-1E1 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BB VACATED AN ALLEY LOCATED city Council Minutes April 19, 1989 Page B SOVTHERLY OP 9TR STREET AND WESTERLY OP CALAVERAS AVENUE APPAOXIHATELY 20 FEET WIDE ANO 157 PEST LONG -APN 207-241-21 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 89- 181. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • x + + x E2. COlB1VNITY DEVELO T T PLIC TION PISCAL YEAR 1989-90 - The adoption of the Final Statement of Community Objectives for the fiscal year 1989-90 and preliminary selection of projects based on an anticipated grant of j433,000. 00. Staff report Presented by Miki Brett, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There Deing no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLVTION NO. 89-182 A REEOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THfi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTS POR FVNOING FoR TH6 COlSMVNITY DEVELCIPMBNT HLOC% GRANT PROGRAM FOA FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 89- 182. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. f R f E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14218 - NORDIC/TREE AEHOVAL PERMIT 99-09 - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving a residential eubd ivision and design review of 8 single family lots on 5.71 acres of land in the Hillside Residential District, located north of Inspirer ion Drive and east of Crestview Place -APN 200-441-23. Associated with the tract ie Tree Removal Permit 89-08 requesting the removal of two 92' Eucalyptus globulue. Sta Ef report presented Dy Beverly Nissen, Resistant Planner. Mayor Stcut opened iha maPt±nV for p :.l i~ near rng. Addressing Council were: Harry Kato, secretary of General Partnor of the owner of the property. with him was Jim Knudsen, CP Lang Engineer e, representing Nordic. Mr. Kato expreeaed the project had gone through all the approval processes and nest aii tine taws and reoui at ions of the City, and they requested the appeal be denied. Theze being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Councilman Buquet expreeaed it was inappropriate for Council to take action on this until the entire Planning Commission heard this matter. City Council Minutes April 19, 1989 Page 9 Jamee Harkman, City Attorney, stated they have a valid approval which was appealed by Larry McNeil, Planning Commie eion chairman. Council now has jurisdiction. when there Se a three member quorum, a 2-1 vote is sufficient. Councilwoman Wright elated it was her undereianding chat this would have been appealed by Mr. Horgan had not Larry McNe ilr Planning Commieeion Chairman, done so, and we do have a letter from Hr. Morgan. Councilwoman Wright further asked if iC was possible to require a quorum, or 3- 2 vote. Jamee Markman, City Attorney, stated that any resident can speak to an item, but it was Larry McNeil, Planning Commie eion Chairman, that appealed the project, and he was not present tonight. The City Council could continue it unless there was an agreement with Larry McNeil, Planning Commies ion Chairman, and the applicant to send it back to the Planning Commiealon. The jurisdiction was before the City Council. Councilman Baguet expreeeed concern that this is the first time he could remember something like this happening, and he felt Council should set up a procedure to preclude a Commission approving eomething on a 2-1 vote in the future. Jamee Harkman, City 9ttorney, stated they could look into ihie but presently, under general law, a 2-1 vote is ae good ae gold. Councilwoman Wright stated she was in favor of upholding the appeal. councilwoman Brown concurred. Councilman Baguet stated he did not have any feelings on the project itself, only that we need to set up some cegu latione, that unless four-f ifthe of the Planning Commission was present, eomething like ihie would not happen again. It was a policy matter that the whole Planning Commies ion did not hear the item. Mayor Stout stated this area had been discussed before the Planning Commission ., years ayo. a.uuncii made a strong statement that they wanted at least one acre in that area. He felt we should stick to the policy of the City. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to uphold the appeal, end direct ate EE to prepare a resolution denying the project. Motion carried 6-0- 0-1 (august, abstain). : • x • x x F. PUBLIC HHARINOB No Items Submitted. • R • R city Council Minutes April 19, 1989 Page 10 O. CITY M1IHAOER•B STAP! REPORTS G1. REPORT ON THS BXTENSLON OP 19TH STREET EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE Staff [sport p[eeented by Paul Aougeau, Traffic Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public ha aring. Addressing Council were: Tom Albert, expressed concern about safety and asked why there were not Left hand turns ineialled in the Deqinring. xaren Speaks, stated because of the safety coneiderat ions, Fiqute 3 was not their firer choice of opt ion e; however, they have no objections to thin plan. John O•Meara, owner of the shopping center at Highland and Y.aven, pointed out that business had decreased, and they would be willing to do anything to gat that road open. Cathy Rushing, asked about the area of Victoria and Haven, and what was planned there. Ruesell Maguire, City Engineer, responded this would be coming to the Council Eor approval at the next meeting. This one doesn't require approval from CALTRANS. Cathy Rushing, also expressed concern about the speed limit along there which ie 45 m.p.h. on Victoria, snd the traffic on Valinda. Rueaell Maguire, City Engineer, stated they have been monitoring the [toff Lc on Valinda. John wings, owner of the jewelry store in the shopping center at Haven and Highland, emphasized bueineee had dropped dramatically. There being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the public hearln9. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he had met with the new Deputy Director of CALTRANS, and he had et at ed they would entertain option number three. If Council concur e, etaft will continue to pursue this. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to concur with option number three, and direct staff to proceed with their negot lotions with CALTRANS, and eL Liie Hanle Lime, Lut slat[ Lu wruueed wldb a Geuarni 'r inn elnandm6 At. MJL1Jn carried anon imouslyr 5-0. x x e• ~ e Mayor Stout called a receee at 9:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:00 p.m. with all members of Council present. . . City Council Minutes April 13, 1989 Page 11 G2. REPORT ON SAPPMI RE TRAIL -Review of proposed community trail improvements on the west aide of Sapphire Street, south of Banyan Street. Staff report presented by Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout openetl the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Linda Valenti, who thanked Council for meeting with them and appreciated the three toot high fence. She felt it would eliminate 900 of their concerns. They wou Ld be willing to gc along with the fence height modifications before using breakpoints. Fred Deaux, stated he had suggested various graduated height e, with the fence range being even lower at the breakpoint e. There being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to reduce the fence height to three feet at this particular section. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • • r, + ~ ~ G3. EVCALY PTVS WINDROW PRESERVATION - An overview of the City's windrow preservation program, with discussion of policy options. Staff report presented by Otto Eroutil, Deputy City Planner. ACTION: After a lengthy discussion, Council concurred with the following: w; .o a ~ a,ltanr t„ do a wv rvsv with recommendations for the windrows Ghat should be preserved in the Alta Loma area. 2. Develop a policy position whether to plan around or do a complete removal of a windrow. 3. Come back to Councii on the maintenance issue to alert Council of the commitment of maintenance co et e. St afE requested 4-6 months for the project. ~ ~ . ~ « . G4. REPORT ON INITIAL PROCEEDINGS FOR FORMATION OF COMMVNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT E6 2 TO LEVY ECI L T TO P FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC FAC LI ES FLOOD ....,. nGL~ Ai v L,.ri E:: a^DFCEMgNT SERVICE^u Staff report pre aerted by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. Addressing Council were: Warren Divan, bond counsel, who went over the reeolut lone and taz rate. Joe DiIOrio, representing Caryn Company, landowner consortium. City Council Minutes April 19, 1989 Page 12 ABSOLUTION NO. 89-183 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAILING APPOINTNENTS IN A COHMVFITY FACILITIES DISTRICT RESOLUTION N0. 89-384 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIA, ADOPTING BOUNP:.RY MAP SHOWING PROPEATISB AND LAND TO EE SERVED BY CERTAIN PUBLIC CAPITAL FACILITIES AND LAW ENPOACEMENT SERVICES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT RESOLUTION N0. 89-185 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAr DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY PAC ILITIES DISTRICT AND TO LEVY A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN SAID COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 89-186 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING AND DTRECTZNC THE PAEPARATZ ON OP A FINAL "REPORT" FOA A COMMUNITY PACIL IT IES DISTRICT RRSOT.IIT TON NO. 89-18'1 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS SECVRED BY SPECIAL TAXES TO PAY FOR CERTAIN FACILITIES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MOTION: Roved by euquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Noe. 89-183, 89-186, 09-185, 89-186 and 89-187 establishing the Community Pacil it iee District. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. R R R R 1 e. COUNCIL BVBINESB ..c ,.~e„s GubaS «e,.. I. IDS PI ON O TENS FOA E MBETIN I1. Councilwoman Wright Yequeated n report on lobby efforts with CALTRANS, epee if ically getting together with other clt iee end developing some apectfic plena. City Council Minutes April 19, 1969 Page 13 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City Hanager'e group has been dealing with CALTAANS, and the CLOUT group went recently to Sacramento and addreeeed these issues. He asked if Council wanted more done. Council directed that a staff report be done. I2. Councilwoman Wright requested policy regarding four-fifihe quorum for planning Commission from the City Attorney. 13. Councilwoman Wright requested a Recycling Sub-committee report 19. Councilman Buquet asked if "Communications Prom The Public" could be moved up in the agenda, and to have a report et the next meeting on this issue. ~ • . • • ~ J COMMUNICATIONS PRON TNB PUBLIC J1. REOUSST FOA INFORMATION BcG7~RD ING COSTS OP RECYCLING Staff report presented by Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst. ACTION: Report received and tiled. J2. John Erickson asked when the minutes were released. He had been in City Hall and the minutes had not been approved, The City Clerk explained they had not yei been typed, but tapes and action agendas were available. m,w,.h ~nx~n romn~ a..omm r mnl alned ahnnt hie nai n_hhn rhnnA not being aware of a development, and he proposed the following: 1. AL1 commercial prof sere should he signed 2. When addressing lettsra to homeowners, it shoo ld be addreeeed not only to the homeowner, but to the current owner. 3. All project tleecriptions should be explained in a way the homeowner can understand. 4. He felt that carwaehee shoo ld be removed from neighborhood center designation e. Councilwoman Wright requested that all these items be added on the next agenda for consideration. J4. Kevin Eggleston thanked Council for the recycling report. Ha simply wanted to know what s[a[f •e costa were. J5. Jim Bookout asked why council devinted from the agenda edding items which were politically oriented. City Council Minutes April 19, 1989 Page 14 J6. Councilwaoan Wright also requested the item regarding half-way t,oueee addressed in Assea~b lyman Aader'6 letter De on the next agenda. • f R • R R x. ADJOURNI~AT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to adjourn to an ADA Closed Session, and to readjourn on Thursday, April 27, 1989 fora joint meat inq with the Foothill Pire Protection District. Notion carrietl unaniswvely, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 12:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet city clerk Approved: +~ RANCHO CVCAMONGA JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE DISTRICT MEETING MINUTES April 27, 1989 Ad iourned Meetino An adjourned joint meeting of the Aancho Cucamonga City Council and the Foothill Pire Prevention District met in the Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga, on Thursday, Apzil 27, 1989. Mayor Stout and President Kevin Eggleeton called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Present Were: City Council members: Charles J. Huquet, William J. Alexander, Pamela .l. Wtight, end Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Hoard members: John Lyon, Lane Hateuno, Patricia Quintana, Pete Amodt, and Chairman Aevin Eggleeton. Absent was: Council member Deborah N. Brown. Also present from the City were: City Managerr Jack Lam; Deputy City Attorney, Craig Fox; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet. Also present from the Fire District were: Fire Chief, Dennis Hichael; Legal Counsel, Eugene Demchuk; Recording Secretary. Robin Brock. R R R R R R B. DISCUSSION ITENS The purpose of the meeting was to discuss some basis issues between the two boards regarding the setting up of a eubaid iary Fire Distr Lct with the City. R R R R R R el. UNDERSTANDZNO OF NEED TO VPDATB EIISTINO FIRE PROTECTION MASTBA PLAN TO INSURE RECOMMENDED BERVICB LEVELS AR6 MAINTAINED. StaEE report wes preeented by Dennis Michael, Fire Chief. May ..teat _ ,ded .... _he -sport ,..*.at .he CSty Cc..rc.. agreed these needed to be a review rof the Master Plan. w The •C ity has had an interest in master planning for facilities planning for a long time. R R R R R R City Council/Fire District Minvtee April 27, 1989 Page 2 B2. CONMITMSNT TO PROVIDE NECESSARY PINANCIAL SVPPORT POR NEEDED PIKE PROTECTION SERVICE LHVELS AND PACILITIES. Staff report presented by Dennis Michael, Pire Chief. Mr. Michael pointed out that the northwest portion of the City was in need of fire protection. They are looking at land in that area for acqu ie it ion of property for an extra fire etat ion. They are looking for a commitment from the City for the financial resources to fund necessary capital expenditures far fire protection in that area. The issue ie that the Fire District is precluded from charging a fee on new development. Mr. Lam responded that there has been discussion regarding the issue of additional needs. With the update of the Masser plan, this should identify the needs and options of financing. The City does not see this ae an impediment. Hr. Michael stated that had the City not formed the Redevelopment Agency, they would not have had [he financing available to build the facilities they are build Lng today. Within the ADA Fund No. 25, are funds going directly to the Fire D isirict. Mayor Stout expressed the Council would oat think about taking on the responsibility of the Fire District iE they did not feel that public safety was top of the prior lty list. Wright questioned what the impact would be on the General Fund. Mr. Lam responded by referring to the Ralph Anderson Study which pointed out that in forming a Subeitliary District would bring a short fall of $600,000. In talking with the County, they have looked at a buy down cf avgmentat ion footle, and the County would be willing to go along with a three year buy dawn. The actual impact on the general fund, no one really knows. Chief Hichael stated tnat the Fire Dietr ict has been dependent upon the $1.$ million in augmentation funds. That $1.5 million would come directly to the City and the County would not have any claim on those funds. He further stated that this is the right time for safety and growth reasons Eor the City to be considering this. • w • ~ x R D3. ASTAHD INO OP SON EEISTZNG DISTRICT STAFF WIZ.L MEAGE INTO TAE PAESBNi CITY ONOANIEATZONIIL STRUCTURE VPON IMPLEMENTATION. Staff report by Jack Lam, City Manager. Board member John Lyons asked how the fLre staff would function? Mr. Lam responded that the Fire chief would basically Eunct Lon like a department head answering Co the City Manager. City Council/Fire Dlatri ct Hinutee April 27, 1989 Page 3 Hr. Lyons asked how ie going to answer to the Board of Directors. Mr. Lam responded the City council would act as the Board of DireOtora. Mr. Lyons asked if Council felt they could take on the extra duties and reeponsibil hies of the attendance at all the different meetings they were involved with. Mayor Stout expressed that Council's basic responsibility was to set policy. Council would not get involved with the day-to-day opera[ ions of the Fire D ietrict. Mr. Amodt expressed concern about personnel and if they would be able to continue to take care of fire equipment or would they have to atop to repair other city equipment, such ae street sweepers. He felt the City personnel should care for these needs with the fire district personnel working on tae fire equipment only. Mr. Lam stated there was no intention to disrupt or interfere with the working relationship of the Flre District or with the way the Fire Chief rune the Fire District. Carrell Luttrall, repr¢eenting the Fire Pighters Association, spoke in favor of what he was hearing. This issue would be coming before their people, and he felt they would vote in favor of this. He did express that their Association b¢ represented in any furtaer workshops. Councilman eu cu et ae ked if [hers were anv ~ntlinn labor neeotiat ions. Chief H is hael responded only the middle and upper management for the new fiscal budget. . . « . . « B4. CODNCIL PRILOSOPHY OF RSSIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLE I C AN FI0.E DISTAICT PARAMEDIC PROGRAM. Rea ids nt lal Pire Sorinklec Ordinance: Legal Counsel, Eugene Oemchuk, et ated the ^letcict dose have such an ordinance for mu It lple unite that exceed 7500 square feet. This Le sensitive to the Fire D ietrict and would like to hear comments on thin since the City dose not require this. They are interested in: 1. ,..,..... be done t..: ough the b,...... nq permit prsccas. 2. Nake it a part of the project approval phase in planning. 3. Most comfortable would be to have the Council make findings to modify the Building Codes ae the Fire District has done. Nr. Lam stated we have had convereatione with the City Attorney and agreed iha greatest comfarC would he to make find inge in the Uniform Building Code. Thta City Council/Fire District Minutes April 2l, 1989 Page 4 subject would be coming up any way in the City even if we were not considering making the Fire District a subsidiary district. Paramedic P[ogram: Chief Michael stated a convnunity survey had been done to die cover what level of service was desired by the community. The item would 6e going on the ballot in November or April because the Fire District do¢en't have the finances to provide the level of EMS services desired by the community. If the public ie willing to approve by 2/3 vote for such services, they will have it. Council concurred that they were not Ln a poeir ion to discuss this without previous study. . R • R R R B5. PEASZE ILITY TO NAZNTAIN EZISTLNO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT JOINT POWERS AUTHOR I SCT TO NO RS' ONPEN ATION AND LIABILITY. Mz. Lam stated we have looked at the moat coat effective approach to give ue the moat coverage. Both agencies feel that whatever given ue the beat deal. A RR1 Mayor Stout called a recess at 0:45 p. m. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. RRRR R R R R R R B6. C S DE TI ADDIN I S TO E U L C S FE COIOII SSION FOR A PERIOD OF 24 MONTNS TO ASSIST IN THE INPLBMENTATION TRANSLTION. Report presented by Chairman Kevin Eggleston. Mayor Stout stated there are members on the Public Safety Commission who are from the Fire District already and one fireman on the City Council. He euggeeted that a Trans It ion Taek Force of two counc ilmembere and two Eire board members be formed Eor a period of twenty-four moot he. Director Quintana euggeeted that when the next opening occurred on the Public Safety Commisei.on that a fire board member be considered. Chairr~an EqG laatcn auy Ge sled teat the Cc~ncil decide which way they wished tc go; any of the ideas euggeeted were okay. } } } R R R B]. CONSIDEM ON O 6 I9 CT P T TI P TRANSITION. Chairman Eggleston expressed that this would be a good time to change the name of the Fire District. City Council/Fire ^iatrlct Minutes April 27, 1989 Page 5 Chief Michael stated LAFCO had told him that their role was not to ^name^ a group, but they would make it a part of the proceedings iE both elected bodies approved the name change. Mr. Lam stated the final decision would be left up to the legielat ive body. Chief Michael felt it should be made a part of the proceedings. Councilman Alexander wanted more time to think about this. Hayor Stout stated that perhaps the name on the trucks and uniforms could be changed at a later time. Council concurred this should be added to the Nay 3rd agenda for consideration. The Fire District had approved this already 5-0. R R R # # # B8. IMPLBI~iTATION SCHBDVL6 POR MBROBR. Aeport presented by Chief Richael. Mayor stout asked if the issue wag for the City to take over on July let, he would be willing to go ahead with it. But ha felt it was a policy decie ion to be made by the Fire District Board first. If they are ready, the City Council would consider this and to work with the District, 4nTrnu• Mn..nA h.. uah anon oonnnAoA h., OmnA! !n n .m 1ho m nn rl {rte than July 1 to include some type of transition taekrforce. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Amodt, Matsu no, Quintana, Egg leaton NOES: Lyons . . x • a . COMMONICAT IONS PROM THB PUBLIC Jim Frost expressed Ceuncil was making a decision that was not in the beet interest economically fot the City. He also expressed that Supervisor Mikele would be committ irg political suicide. It will coat the City $400,000 from the General fund. He also questioned what the rat i.rement benefits and personnel CVete WUU ld be. • R } { R 1 ADJOURN!ffiNT NOTION: Moved by Alexanderr seconded by Bu goat to adjourn. Motion carried G- 0-1 (Brown absent) Ciiy Council/Piro District Minutes April 27, 1989 Page 6 MOTION: Moved by Lyons, seconded by Mateuno to adjourn. Hot ion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk 9715 Danvan Street Alta Loma, CA 91791 Mav 11. 1999 Peverly Authelet, City C1er Y. City of Rancho Cucamo n~a Curamonn a. California Cear Mrs. Authelet. the Coalition {or Better Government in P.ancho Cucamenoa remuests that the follewina teoie be placed on the Citv Council Aoenda tc. be heard at reoular meetino o{ May 17. 19H9: "I'he Coalition {or @etter fiover nment in the Rancho Cucamonga rwoncsts that a motion Ge made and passed by the City C.ounc it of R=nrho Cucamrinua that Council Member Deborah Brown be censured for her failure to carry nut the resoonsibilitiec of the public tract i~r an aonrouriate manner." ~ ~ ~~. ~c.~ ~Y ~ ' ~z7i:.~.<r.~ Catherine V. Nn due ' Catheri nc+ V, Rridne Fiwmhcr at ~ df PP foalition for Fetter fiover nmenk in Rancho Curamonua Pt'J "rvno sOmOU`u Ua O-~w r..00..h :O w`O~hOOO~nOG mP0 I'-OOSWU„JOm WU.. wOOV' OO .. h00 Uv v?'Jmm .O mm .-~ rur n tip'. 2 ~L i ` ... r^. w ~ n 2 Pm.r PO.. PO-. .'J LLi mW.L OgNVUOIO PpPPPPPPPP0000000000 O PPPPPPPPPPPPS PPP PPPV POCOOOiJ0000 <i T~ mnmm mmmmmmmm mr'fmmnn m..r r.rm mmmnmmmmmmmmmmmmm 9 0 n poi i u LL: .. .. `.i`z a` .. s ~u z x z i"" io ~ x vW i:J i ~ _ O O Yv.f W WS W Woti 41 .N.o v~>rn w.i O w2 aF0^ P wywFT O oZh u` V UZV VSr~wUJwV uyyP ~i .-YNK9< I +` ~ O<mW.. 3N~ '] ^<vr PS ~ V J V w o ~n Y ~. Vw>- o. -(w Uwe-P6 rL~w t>a uUa3e iVVK iiVu V J OV'i-u rOwOZ i~ VU _ rv>rc~0600~u U U 7~J.<V X261 iJ P KL.+t M1N4rVY~U~4 SSs r> r.K ~ ~YU0264VY>'r'2w 42i ~"Z~VSVr w.S..L CLLYN .~-J9ii y. ~ ES w .n a0> .[rJ SOCiN V>Z 1-LO piutt l0 > r0>u vrlfw2 LOi>r.~2 ~>J 2a7 VNaw3Ni-'LV r) ~. w U u - S^ ti U V ~C O n - wi. L 6~h r S R TO VZw=U~ Y~=NO¢V :wn W ~2 >¢NNrni ZVOYrr¢9~ <>w a9 W ~U >Y S JYwl mW~VUTC JI-{SUS 06 ZVw3U trZUYO uO>YKZw>~wV° { < ~+V LO(rrn SU<<U CL<w0 ..~Jw2~- O r w OVwr u<uoLLw6u wiNp ~ Y L6 2 wqm{Oa K~WNHV ~Vm«Y LL aw aW..wW< "oT~uLLi qw.°~<o~wmWZwWOw u < <mw 22.+ °OOOZLLYw62SY 2{O Uti S w22 U<LLUUJUV~+K LLrnr ~-<22N NV<mo000wu KwS« •.J ZKLL¢rZN°° {< {rr i.Jq{LLq « o > >Or°N «««S{«{«fmOmm90~'^902mOVVV O ry ry.u 4rN p..nNNO-.90nOS.pNNNl.J m ur .uTh.pNO<Inhr in n h nhnl N ^P.r .n nOm~+wmmns.r Nm0~0 NPN t 2i mO000 J`OY^O P^O^.]O rOPU':JVmOOVy~.O ODUNmUn +rv0 + O^-~O ^•OOV •n06'+`n0•+wNmmO O O~t•rw wPrv.rUnmp +m nOprv+V .(r rm ^ u~pP ~.V r~'~N mmu~.-r ~.rv~mU ~v ~..r .+ w.n r~.+ .+m N u` r• ^ m r v O O^Hm+N~Yr mPO^n'• YM1rW nm u••prmPOY~~±YS.Or Ji PO m000pmOOmOmO n~•mmmmmmnmmOm mnmp00000mmmnmmmmmm w¢wt ~W Z 2 n V V iv r-..- tir•u nrrr rn r>r r-i ttrc~ s xs is rL ozxz x ~a o - `_-ott p ~v ~.; p sou Ur y WW WLW V1-~ WWJ WUWW WWWPW S mOHr w32 rnUw 2d < ZJrC 2 N6y LTV 2<+Ji ~¢O~ YO ~a~<~w uNii< u~d=Q GL n¢Yw NLC7>Jd•+ WZSW OVartwVr l<wu~ •<-•C Y iiOrr pUUUi•[ 62Z w20 Vl0 •n>•+ OLr6rv,n >OL iOrNN _U pl- L PL V>21-OOUr¢~ U^U <O-~UV •m,.c~c°3° ui~ld ~>~ RVwwwiY <~n>w2 Ntm<~ <30pJ¢w6~ w0l i¢V7p>•+wtt6N~-~••+6pSWa<V•w[~JUL>LmZN~rrN<VLO•[JZ S ^ n2> V V_ n Ga VU r =s~ ~ - =»~7 >»~~ ^W~~ 2t~J 21 Ow N3w mZViti¢w LLIW¢¢¢ <{ UVWVr> <i rOgnprpwww~ V LZ Z•-•u r.r 3 V•n 0~-S«>N «J>~r„OZ.i JJVY~7 •nJ LL ¢CwVUrJ .~> wm .vU O¢N •Z w>< OZ03i+wwww>ZSJ~+Np<>pl 220irw0 ~+222p00 U¢'Z COVZ ri3 pOV{w pw p p OL O =« V« dOW~+iO~70JrUZ Owi V<WGUVO :„N¢ FFwwW W<u„r i•i <iCt6Nr «Z •¢r U U ~- SS {ViZ ZZ ZVjZW2rur~V¢r « >wrv 2w N'nNNwyy <uiuuuuiu~u°u~u°u°u°o~uir¢. cclo ~~oaooo <o w„°~~owWww:ww PNmOO m•+O rrrpOO~NNrrryN^^OOrrmmOr~00rmmmNPN PrrrWOOtiJmmry NNm.nyWONry m OJrNNNryY~O .~Nrvrrv nmry Or ^NryNrw Nr ^+r O^OONwry y.pP {~u~N ryJM 3 nppu PCw m:n GP~~ nCOONGPpn ~ m000c n - PO N~-w'.p LGOu .(:OP~O [~r tlGl-w-+C U~u' u .prwPOn POf: P :C l: O oocppooo occuoooooooooc oooocoooo~oo .i ii nn:.:,~:~mm~~,m:.~:~m:~,~m:.~m:..,.:nn,.~:~:..nMnn :.. m ~., ,.. .>, ,..N n:.~,.: :.,m z= n 0 LL ~ - u :-. r~ :.. n~ J r K ~ .Y Q¢TYw .uZ ¢ w_P w_ i .~ 'Z 2'J ~' Q S 2 ~2n< r0 Ov. ?L ~- O 2 n :] .t fJ ~ O O oW Yw0 .~ u W Sw ~.: O a ~-22:V-~u W>[ Ti t / > w~ J :cn rµ ,a anon .¢-J so no ~~°o` `°owrc zzw2o`2 w.z ¢ < w05 N'O ,T UU mV~K ~c+.VV V«¢Z:YZ OpwO.'<~ ~ZULLwC¢O~ mVm <O~ - OJa: 4>Z 1-'C Eau <Lp VU~pyVw Y¢ whJ r YU(J <S:n ">:`r"--.l..n ~~rJhC~W20~ - 2:uL SiVi2 ~ .~>a m2 mJUw< ¢1-6t{uu>mcWYiK.~ P~:V K41Z-6 r~3¢VU..¢w26Y>mZVU2 V Z 2 r~ >u r ¢JY UL S _ Y ~ U U ~[ 2 I- < wF V J ~'Om y wow O ] :n WV< PJ P OF ~:v F yw T V O ~-: 2^~ ~ O 0 Y C OS ,-r T ~ :LrY w M1 OSV~2 K<Z <rr JwW p<¢w Otf¢>J [L..'J<¢¢ YS <_'[ O~w wY wrj LU rvn4 ~2~r. ;Z.-.U OUVOO W W':Ln U'LL 4WpILLVm JfrJ •':<a ~~¢ r<u.SVU' OtO Z.n <:.]2 w O¢ w POVwO¢wU w~ Sw :-:i :2-:K U'i0N<;}<~n¢wW .. Z:nrw~0 wO7¢ LL6WwZru 6222wKwwwV Urn 2>w ¢~n1mpV<OOZV¢LLKS U'2Y P ~+w ~-:O OR¢ OwWOw6r.-<J¢p<SOO .OY C22 2 ~:pOpww wb u u. Gl-U U'tglV'OVSJi Y~-SSV:Yi~~+:vr }:rV 1~'~¢YY O Yi rv0.'P np Pl-y.yO LL~.Ow Nlna:a~V .~n N.p :nN N~NTyO n~Nm^:F.N-:~mm~Yml dim r:nN NnnI H~ONrmNN':l d.nl O!lUr~ N ~ N „ OP..O wP J:nN N~tlN.-: N r'rP YI NiN Ntiw °"°o°,.:.Yr~°oo°."i.°co°cp`cor.,p+ov°ec°OO°°°c °omi°°oc°°°"`u` rv V Y f P - CO~.n.~ m nOU~ +v NOJ r, ,~ r nr~n Jevorrrv-~ P o~N Po.N nzPa PPPPPnuPOVO OOVOOOOr.~w 10000000 _{I mmnmm min n,m mm mmmmmmm m„Immmmmm.nm mm.-~m r.mmm nmmm 1 3' M ttC.c¢¢~Y F G2 M,LK¢pv. ~" rH _ _ _ _ _ w2wY _ +:2h~p. ~~ SS7xw 7mOpUOpY rLLapYw Op ~V OV ~"WWWWW ~+ WSrvw~-~W W1nW_ WWWW~n W.~NWWW ~SY Y ZOO rib ~V ~Or)Y E~~I r _ a> 1 1 wiSp~ p Y ¢>rww j0 7L V 'a3>nw6J>z w>LLl <OVN v~>U uSip¢' ¢G Vw WJ<x w~f>hYtpVOjJ ~+~~-'`L O V>.v .~ V2~ ,pn OR KUJ yV C,Z~Ki ~VJVUmY Cl wOiLL rVf {,vZ <S_J > tJ . KS< E)UC42Uw<C «6r,i w{LmOm o.ua a zami x~+ rmrmppNaw¢ zi.+NN rc.E.o emu:, w~~`.,: w ~u.cxE .- i~z mz~p>Y x~.uJYa~ rr.z. w <w~+mIIO Nr>¢O< 1 U,np~mmry{V<l.npR¢LLa v~V,n Vi20F'VU.nV{wiLLam TpZURZa L V t O VZ¢ u n W V w V 6 V_ nZJ < r .n _ {h V VZ2¢ ~Z ~.<-,YV iW ~y O ZOa6 t2VN2 uZZ ~V .L p02~+~Zm~ YV .+,1N __ ¢ ,-'~ OSiH Tww,nOga 2 V4 <WWV a r 3 UJ7wwOaUtOVS { wV~Vi ezi~ m ~ m~YOVOrrW W'<_Z< ~U r.~¢ YEN >V U(N9r O< St~Ol r~+Zww106¢mf• WZS J~,+ o Y 0660w2VwZ K _6p m~-~. YmW LLwNGU tir+ Zu i 6{ wVJw<Z{2w Fw_xYip O__a VNlm V<ww NVaip ¢aY n HO7 ~VrJL¢~i « Z1OOfJ r O -~ lOwVw OYWLLVYY00 Y¢xtiWW<56'mhV¢rwiLiwU wOWE3<Y~OVO ¢. ~-Y 2N~UVVm>r.,W¢¢Vj10VU J./Y'N<L a<W..W ,.. ««uuura<zi•..a<xxoo z ««<{Ww ii~.~~LCOILCILLLCr-tea Leis oauzzoaoanaaoau>a 0 om n..PN Nr~^iati~°-rvnnnr~.rrvno um ~,o~.`. `n in N.o ~r"n .iOOUir-m. rm.mm m mmm v....a omm.on Y.e ,< nnM1°ar~nrymomn i .. N n N .. N N -. .. N pN-.pPrno..o amoaoY.r m..N Tml-o noeooooeo o.-N Nm.ooo FM1hWI-gOOgCYNhpG`hpY.ym Y1-Y gOryOT0000q apFPFPOU N gOhPNawYaOaOtlvrvN •N OOam000aa~~m NmPOmN <1 n wTP ~h~"~ Y NOYOHyTNJ^NN NaryNaNgw YYTamNatihYmTNNmYO .. YO T 6 { 1 h ryN N PYw N m~+ TI < YI OmY wNrvYa~frNwPgnNNFaPO-~NTYNaFmPO^NT D I ma~~<awaaaahnn~- {I Tml^TTTTT mTmmmTmmTTmmTmmmmmmTmmT~m~mmmn Tl~T ? Si TTTTTmTmTTTTTTTmTTTTmTTmTTTTmmmmmmTmTT u 1 NzNNN i i f'fr'~<W<sNi:~W zzz zi+zz ¢ ~ a¢ a.4 ¢iaa¢oa4¢oW.o¢¢a r~ a¢¢a¢ i w ... ~.. ~.. w_r-~., ~.. W_¢....W w_W_ .~ ~N _W___w_ ¢ F ',[ Fa MN S •f O P ti {hhhZhhh WhDhh 4i 6 00 OOOU000;000N=M1 UO IZ • OOOOO .<i W WWW WWW=WWWQZNWW 6 aOWWWWW 1 N>wWw<wiwaU! YWV ~ 1w O. -~ U U YVJ OVWtF V N 4 w62S2•YNZ a N •w IryU 1 w N~wwSW Fi~w~ U 4 i •~NO Y< r4l wl7 S <_w¢ ¢1 Z Yh hhh H~+hO JZ S<iN Oe? <UW N NI W w J4Z~ZN<JZ¢Pmw <i JS ¢N601-'> Y VU N VUSJ«<LOiyM1a4NYt6 O}OY~QY~•<LINOj6 of xz szorzai •Dr2u TrOO¢ z <fuJCa~ w Wi u .z.Y ry z J awnF iiz W +i WW w..zsr ~iN wWWZ{Nw~Wh 4i `u ..Dw s hT o~-im O SFWmw.aJM .4 < S¢F {w VJwSiP~NO 1 h~J UUUJ2 U•~602i¢NN OgN¢SyI 42 I ~Z~W<2SZ4hNNI~wwSti 6>ffuuOh7JSw4LLOW9>NPJmLSLL ^I «¢9u0i¢O<¢wu2iw wtipw NU2ijiliOOwrwiN•Ow~W6lrvY w~- Zi•4JiVC43»>ISw>w>062<yJOJNUNpNahaPTp6NR 1 1 1 h a N U G Y 1 ti O H VUU6 i zo u o° _ u _ L I v_w V_J W l C U 14 NOU I ¢ 4 N ~ > O N N N 1 OD reW` r •4~ OL a WuOiwD OU: i 4p -N . ¢o DW uaoN uh ~o Jiu • haoa:z om~ i S ; <U Oa V:wO JNW W~YT f¢ < 2iSSUN ¢ V 'FLw yNWwW Oh><tLLht¢ ZOYL YG ¢aK¢i 1 O > T¢DN»> aCnO Zi¢W Nr~V¢< mN 0000<w 42 2 ¢WNIMMN D<h SW=WWW V~+6 w4 W^W~NaY2 = OM 90 >N hh> hOO VOjwwlah< <2 9wIW OOq•NNO<W000 uJiiNl i ~h y NJJJJN4h W SHW6 NL+L 90fNW<qO t1DpO ZNSt L«t<2Wf 4 NOwaaw2J0 000 r Ufh¢ yYY <ONWSWYYVUNO~ O 19Jhh h0<2~hhh ZO9JnWWW ONh ~Ma p I S•NNU<Mh<N«< OV<YOJ<Mw<~aaWW~JiLN~¢a6 aG[< N I w OZiUZNy aOpZ Yy~N CWWWFON¢0N WWWWt<h N I Fi\ 1`W Wf 6a6<i0'22S 6aiRODO WY >>SS220yy J 1 O tcYZMOLi yYUYyy ___ ' 0w •ShM1hhii OY•S•WR'rvl Qpp Oa~JYUWi <YZ1 !h>)~ ~pMJNh00p~Jp~j It i Y4•:C-i~•aa{a¢aWa ~aaia6LNNN~Y<iNCZNNNNNN~ O >1 tl PHlgtiOTgla'Iwwq gmOM1aTN<'Y N0w10 NPgTh N111n MM!<Nw „ • hr.Ih gryTga H~yg ggqTN.Y OPAwhn ghaOTTyTTT<T NTwrwT 1 yTgNn .Nlq yINNN yw~a aTryHNNwPNmrlN ylYhryMT O1TTaON n N 6 ONO O•a•m OOOOTO^06WmhO0Ym OOOmmpWMO00FOmONPWPPO^m F I .p <I OON ^N n0n0•oN <PrvN••10 •on^NnC ^ NP^ mi•Y NO^~Nn ^•ev^u YO^ i NP n _ Y •YNPN ¢ I N N ^ T rv n ^ G •~I l~ m 2 it YNihmPO^NTf N•OFmPO^NmYNi hhM1hnmmm<O~mmmmPPPPPPP <1 TTTTTmmmTTmmmTT U II TmTTTTTTTTTTTmmmmTTTmmm VJ i 1 V ii ii V Z Z ^ w ^ wn H ~•n V a 1 a a 6 a¢ a M1 Q_W t 1 ^ F^ x O 1 O O NO 00 O o M1 y y zW uu y WW SW ^i W2 iu>^ ~+Y 00 >2 F i4N Wx L Y < 1 ~L• V pHa U p NI NW ~, ^L<=26 a a<6 VIy9M¢JO YXi~-a Vm USF = O OZ= ~L OaWN OI >JTN60001NN a HJ N a NOnWme V~tV J2NWJ O¢1-PONau¢iw pS4 =m<NwooNao u.n orloM1r u zNrWm z^ oNZ~aaW sp.WIr <z~.JJJaoN~~nmu sa1+~jWao eo^=rlsaazoopa^W{z e duNLmsaa=<.•~YNJUax=Sa'AEu Y' z i .. a a V 9 6 Y V O L I a { V VO 1 Y < MF }l 1 V pU 2 ¢u W 1 = W 1 { ~~ V OIUy O~^N iuyW O> R y 1N wZVif 076 < p ¢ aJ WaWWNWf< tN j ¢N 2 DV 2 N~wO_p_i>Oi OJ aM1¢¢f= 'J xu iU p ~=i< Fi0<ao a<Y I Z<Li VajN aaJ O J<a.. <FpO a J<tLYtap%UW I H 2z ¢120ps~ <VjniWWl OFY'yWNWWWW j SXi ~ 2 OMFJ< ZJI~pF •Z J I J>ZZMFNnMMJNW aF•JNS 8W O WI Nq«FW9 <~i~` W~ W ~'sv~»FN<~~ITOrKN w tl PO•+TJwOniPT hfnaNt•I~Of OPM ~ •I TyOPh~tif nwN Ii I~Pq Tf PfOF phw?~f'I wPO 111ifFmiN NNT I N N N `7 0 0-. o.cm r-on~cr or ~-nan :norvrP O~n ~aoon or nn°o c.o anPm..oryr~n~omiop rvp D.a +,oDnrvs~ti -• oa ~o.+c mv~.~. ~o :..~~:,.:..:oia •~.o o.o .: o~n ,oi un. aoaPr~-mJ ~i i ., o." n .. ,~.. .• r o rv ai P 2 PO^hfn .nJl-aPG~hnr r.n .n n+IP O~rv~n rnWnwPOn O it 'P PPPP PaanO~00W~i••~+••^••••m ti•+9NNyyrvryY h~vry lnn < NNNrvNNN• U t 1 mmmmmmmmmmnmmmmmmmmmmmml~IlNn lrl m~N•Imm ml•Immmmnml.lm y Z O NGFtiN O S n ~ Yx-..Y a o u ~ r J Vrwv~w~- U O~ zU ~< VDO~ p i 2 S rc 2 (A V >•- O oY tiia w2 n i~w OL r-lJ UM1 up D ~ LL`•¢'N VJwV<¢Vti¢ s¢iV NV •z-OO~i S a OSyO YO O Npz' N6 wnR IVOr~-¢ 1"•p[¢nl NlR~ U< CpJV Jr•N UUUU VOpI < p •'~t Ur 2_JN<> nJEZZDJM1I-N u< JC¢ r V 2 wZ w~2Omr L6~•6•L-~r1~~Jw ~ .kOH ~uw¢ NN.N~. wN ~Da ~~~ .-u W N =i~oio-2•'auW wy L.¢wiJ M1n M1n ~waLLSL~`~ui aN•. cc¢ wy ..J~z 2.-r xo~~Go G JZ r.u20vND _7<0~6~wuu•+r O~+~u~tik rV u]( v.< YR2<_OU aUM1<_4 __J 2M1¢<i>iuN StL] 2JVFJj Fu Ji S< J ¢ .:~-u'+ OL '~ } w NyN.-o N~¢M1_...-D _ zzJmN u~¢ lL¢tzx2w~+ ~n6a O•n<J••OJuxr¢w< J}a J` diVJ WO<W.,I r. wN« ma~•nnN <¢w2»yPj > ini LZN>YUOM16 u. .UFP¢u.y .rN r1-u V~nu V U O r• ~+ J t O J i 2 I U < M iY < y < S V -•2 YyM1 J S C_ 4 N rJ ~y i i 'J L O~n ,•H V < y~n6 Dwo'JS O 2 JJJ Y ¢ ¢ `rYN <••<v+ U<w> w yet ~p VrOwn V ¢¢•• 2UF uT<r• ¢<V2TU •~•N6i _ i k 2 1 GOM<wN<U M13w~ wL <tfG <1nJS Q'IOmO<Yn < Ur.l Q~c rn ~pWwOWw¢V yw ~~ W iYw N wLJr¢Y.WJm[NCD YWmwM1.L «•U~n O •• p ¢JpNJ O~'2<w00<q O• H6YN6 ZN l•+ti 2,[U l Du}~[ MzOUO uwm)y VOJmMOON 0~+2Yx2 ~• jw o <¢w ~zm o ¢mNJDO ¢¢cwJ ..~ WNW` zaw¢¢ Dw.. sJ¢ mis Ly •LLO<z~ .. „w ~ D xw p<N xJ<wN n_u__ Diww J t : O<U2Vti<S <YPw 09(V LYYn •~wM <M1 ` <V<rrZ <~nJM1VNJIYN2UZNm2p~YONVV¢JJJ¢NY ~ 'J <Yt ]U•'•: JJJx YI•<O<H21•~"•002 9J0 «`<tW S Ca <i «< « «J<mWmJ<Ymm ~nmmumUyUVUUUVV m <1 P n .+aNN OJ+NPmOr M1minNwm •~<NNnYmY.mPmwmm On nPONOmOm^TMm~mTFNrFmPmaWPNm.-.-~n+±P~p N i n rv `nnN.M1 ~ti.Ni, : a<N y~waKr: r: n wN ^N N NN N S GrOTrY rOPV+O rr~000rO0a000na.nPO+7rYU Off: p Or nrlryPOJWa000Wn+rOnOmOpP000~WrvNC Yi O.+G w'C Zr UafrONYn m0000u inaOPUra Z+n ar 1U7 nD+ u'.hwY r m ~ n .- NO~~+ Y~+~^ S ~+ ^ ~+ N m Y N -r rv +~ara NarWPD..NmrY.arWU'G-.N naaWaaaaaaarrr - cmw hryryhNN nrWrrrvry N.vnNN/aNNVnNNhry NrvtvY 3i mmn mmmmmmmm nmmmmmmmmmmmmn mmmmmmmmm~n mmmm J r>- \~ + Owwr Lr rry rn r+ nr n Y n^r rvr <r{rJ < x f SY ZY S.Y pZL L ¢ Sr<2U w m rpr ZSN ii ~~ a%~-o~Yoa u ~ ~LL co.•`o .. S~ioir x s:J VUirS ..ir V n VOFrJV441N yt~'VCf6 i 6JV6 d¢ ~ O ~f VVU6 <Q6Q >2 6<C ¢J<2 ~N L.u iwrc¢ < VJ2CNVKi .lnU O U1iY 00 wUNLL JVL -~V gYw4 O FU ¢Z <Jrr V¢J wUJmLJJiNZ ZY ?Ow »rY WSLLrw JLS uKm • ~+¢ w.Y SNONJrnNN uJr-[YYF tixw J' WOrhYJt <C UOZ 'll NULUr' 2r-r NSYr<~ r+y Ut2w62 NUw r2iVp22ML O 2wwr.aD <¢~N<u~[~<~-rV wJY T.{Z6rr r~W Urw6JOUD U'J LL~u w2J J>ZWwU S IOJr-rZ YJ write ruy .w'.us<w `<YWww<riNZ+<N<~z SL w2 22 VxwO 2 GZ'Y Ux ~D2~r12JV2 J62r Zrr> dU rRr wVMNSOii O0 iYDZ~L~-rxj2 xzai~<'T <Z~fC~ ¢~w r.nONt2nrS NdrrF. OA¢r'rr+LLOU' 00<wrvrrY¢Wr"rf C<J'.uw~u 4xrn inP .] r4LS +~a„rN9~r>wU'Z Jr6V ¢~'Ld6J¢6>Vw~+.~.+U ww<mw6i~wWa L U V V t i-r wr V < V VN WVO U SZG >~ ~ O ZO 7 V Y~ Z V U LL Z Z ~U Niiv .. ~sz Y Y z uc~~- ~'V mL ~V w614 LVV< r>N l.Z 2 OL Y FOLLw< OJ 9 2 J WOw w iZNNN O f uSi or nr WVN LY O Um¢¢ Y a< L< iwr i<Mw N OZ6 ~QU NYN1.nSdF S wOJ NV<N<w f¢¢YUwLL9 JNft7 uOZn YLtUU¢O rYO 7w uw<2ww'rpLFJ ¢DW r-ipw ..oz.a .. r.uooFwrow zaw¢JU as i pJ{z<ii~-..D quo ..s aQZ N~ No~r.~W Uaua o~u r-< is i-rOM< > iZLOOJ<l :w Q'(f <wr..IYSJYV • nn u'J YO Y ZZJNrrwJUJL NTp r<S22< N< OY^r<ww 4rV O<w21 r~¢2L2 OU< l{ OhuYSuNYrWLwLW J) OL ~ YYwO<Jryr+u¢V ¢•r 2JLNaYrWOQ<UOYW^r1~JnW ¢•<W ¢w Zra Sri rnFa GYNUJYr¢ LOYWRW<LVUJ >LOVCW Sfp~<O<.iwt]L <_.,,..a <o..Qw¢¢`<».<e=o Y.DJ V V Y V V'.)UOINOOpwwiNww~IZwLU9p Dr[SW9JLSNSNSr-rn< 'r Y ~ <r WPrr+.r.n ~OrmaOmOmPry+PPOryO+nmMOFMdm.r .O n(rN mN mq++aN+Nm.rON+rNOrNrNPrWOm+rmrN yfNNm.n OPNaO n r N+Pa PPm+Nn.rO N+NryrN+r Nry +rDryaNmry P~+D~w+~ryn 9 ;o~p nno+rnNOdP+roao+rnoaoPpeN w'+.:on+oooo-•• uo~..r poa..nmo-.D..r~J n.o~nu.o+N.. :JhPN _..~P mf,n ,na..n-• •~ ov.~,.~or rvmmo oJ.rcn ~~-.rv c..r ~n~.oJ J a.P rmnnrvr PpIOn .~Ofn NOnDP+ N r1UL r'.JrvaNPNh+ NJN Y n ar...TO.+n Po-.nm+W.a rDPO.+n ,n +~ m+in .pr WPY PPPPP PJPP P(10600oOOn 0.~.+^.• W ymADyYUryamyiyadlm dWDNY. PPPSPV'J PPG'PPTP V S 1 tnmin r•rv rt1 ~'lmmmmmmn11.1 min R1 RI m ~n •nmmnNl•I mRlm nl m •n m1.1N ,1 ~nm m•n ~ s biz r~tirJ• .. .. a ...... _ u YU¢uN u¢•c •YL NY 'Lxx. 2 a i 'NS xxs t ;r L > is p O W6 G6Wr~WJ uWW JJ SW l~VU'am w r FN ^ LL .v < Yy ZP u6 u F ¢ n¢¢J< ? ¢p<u O K nU O lU~Cpt~ O.Y ~T ¢LL 'J yiYU <'J <u•UVF~ N JS~~J S '>7 N6LL ~ 7000 nWJOwJ •LNw .Y.+ i'•' no.'s LL ds: oW°°~ ~i~N~J: :nLLni ..o< N¢r.H Ni.- Np.. al ..iP ~O <YWZ~OJ>d12 •~OjW2NN JPU ¢YrVVd6 L-~<0~~2•n0 Jt NL JYr wlLF.m2 wVn Uuuq WO¢wN~LLUO~ h~wU>L~)V Z~wJJa w<L LLli (<POU OnO «r•iLN~¢ <L< S{ {x2 ~iF~ii~~xa <xsN>N..N LL~wLLS ~z z w4N RrL<V <ON .I w<Onu~w r+Ur~ ~'2•-•r 6Y<~-~-wN HU U~-F~ rt~- S~(Y ~SUiZNO•~2•~ SNFUSF •¢LLL •+U•~•~N<JLO US¢O•~'•L 6ur~cUV¢VrwLV ¢f/.<pn•.o •; ,..S W¢JV <24r+w m<rWU.+U~»t•-~•~SSOw.CT w<G4 iy~m L<~nLULU•JPL.w¢<wsvpu~w,iuWOwvr~iuLL~iLLVWL > Y N O $ 6 ssr i < L ¢ 6_ _ U • V ¢ O L Y/J w L VV V { N i w % •-~ U L•+ ~~ z uWU ac¢ o YVWNw •yV < 6 <WJG2 L Z2 ¢>wNwLN < 3 LL2~^^~ 9 JrWJO rVQL OLw62tFn<? < +~ J ~LL w Oyr~+e+J r00~ J jNW6WNSiY2 N Z2NW i <>z<w2 <w pwspt>W> ¢rW •n OrwV<Uin J Y •LY •n O^•+rJNy N'-y2Jw N tV< QO•~ N az xJx<LL •n NOLywJ W,n ~a «.~~naJS~zz :> n <tOnyJ 212¢V L<JSSOWOVV L~+L< Y n6F~jOm -.mFN~ ~ owWJFN~DpyJi <ww¢ ywo J~DLL ox z <w 2LLJ <V UVL yLJC'LYUWFVIY000 ¢n r-pi< >J ~2 pWY< V2~ JV"uN ¢L2d< NG¢9NiWU uOJ <YJVti<¢V «wpLO< OOr J 00<W w6N2%IOJyJ¢NW>JO Y ¢ OCI<f'OUOL2< ¢Zw~Z J2 P L% ¢004W2n~<t2tiWOOJSW<~•G+t «rL•1¢U_U_U_V_tlUn •V+<SOO •~n •~nupJZYa;YWJJ<JUJJJFU~FJ<LLrW > ¢O V1 +•i 1 <~ •OaaaN N,nPam•+f mPnNW000+'OPa N'D ONdywP a.+Nrm+WTN ¢I fUDPrW<r0•++dPlpnd+0+•9NP41NmryrdFryryN~+O•D •~InPP+ N 1 n WNI.+ir.~wN.fiYdrv~n .+in Nn+I .+NPrrvN rya~OFFaNIF++w wry la ucoWOOI-mOP+~. •.•o rvnoooPPUO ~•ry:oYOam nPrdhd ooNCOdPNO.-r~irvuwooooN.rNOOdoPrh o~-a..Pr ..n do~+~-rv .o .:m p~y .-, oo mc+g oms ~saroo~ '.: ~:.u.i:o m0 O Oi(~rvYW nnL nNP~Y U~m Nr rv ^OP ^OO ~ Pmrv nmP O~n P09 ~+ n ~Um~+N .v ryh^ rv Np0-.rymrNd vPOn~mrNd'-vp0^Nmr aP0^Nmr rrri."r: P PPPPVP,SPP~PT PJPPPPPrvPPPP'p Or Pr'DpPSP rv N.YNNNNNN ii mm ~~mmmmm~.mnmmnmmmmnmmnmmmmnmNmmmmnmmnm~+Nm i c c s~L PY yW ti?~ V n r2 r r-inr~r ~n < ¢i ¢ <KK¢•Y¢2 ~' L N 2LL ^L i p ~ x ni L .'.i YYi •JW Jn~I O:C !w Ye~"L Y~~IOOCh10 L ni L.! r'CmLV x YVNW6Wd J6WV J f6 Y¢iprp ppy yWVVLI K JW LO ¢ NaL iL ]U °i' Nf 2W<66¢SwV VLL 7i ~+diUU <tiW 2 h4pOe¢O LL' e r<~ U n~i;J Wr•¢V V ¢^U~uVJJLVV ? ~¢~^ O a mY J PwNp 9 OpV 000 'JZ N O pOLpH NO ~O~~hr ~1 iLL'OLLw ~WZ z ~zzoNO.. NU.N eN z~ru YYIID E LH NZJ06 L~+r¢riih¢<CM ~Ziti„mN OZ~ Z •+yJww LJ/rup 2%¢n¢ O JS^ JJ\L J MOL ~i u><O~u `ril juuw u.uu u.Y<_mwQN ~ nWU <iu\< < + O.aJJUJUUeC Nw LL 'yLL SV-'iYwt~ .r 2•yw •T W xrv xTxN<J<¢mpFx JUY~OVM1i2l JNUM1°F RFpt¢ x•Z-~<2nNC N~-h NM1MUJa•<iaP' T ON<1-S NrPw m'n LZ~N.~....TJ ni,~uNTNO~wia Nn~`...NL~o¢a¢LLiyN rdnzN¢ ~L Un.~LmJV°i~uCC°OmnnN.u<tiN Yr~n e. w~-, prP ar~.r .nN ~~nLn w LL Wn..r WON.:wrxW+~W pLLnamw ~+YPw .z. °u°~iiuua < zzzzzzo a e o u HO°On.°n ~°ny o " oooovoi ~ YV7 ~ O ° j~ w w WO V h~ ~~+ <~««< T _ n _ JV Ktn. t J r C .Yu' rY.2 w 2~ ZW~r~ ¢ .-wi NN i :. '~ w~¢ so¢ '~N ooopoLLp i i~.'n .~. •.`.u °-.WJ r~ a i¢~n uoo ~r<--°¢y i .W J.......w.~......i L Yo<z ..< ¢a pwoohTehz<JJJJJJ ~'Y< ~'L U ¢~ 2<W219 WLL Y_00 2Y«t««N O JJJNJ~NUi x Wr-wo ~¢<V ww~NO <'J<wOYNU~JVVVVYV- OdJJVN w i0 N1.V ^VrWa0200NN SUM L 2M Y a <rJ UJ°W~J<~4N N <~+OOW• W¢¢¢¢¢i¢p •n •+2iJSr~w• ¢pO:J <ON¢YNNLLtiO W Z 2 .+ JppWWW ., T.ap~ ¢¢x- ¢z eWZJW <¢phzixzx2xp J Unrr:h2G. 2 <FW VV <Nw~+< pwLL2¢¢¢~hn~hh«2 L2hn~N T•Y LUN JSN .Z.[ ~¢h)pO¢22¢Y<W<f i> e°O'Jt w G1}~LOOOWi06L~6~¢~`a6Y¢¢6SN V<itNWNNNNY°i~~NN U°1N 1T i <~ OdPONhhN~+bOOhNr~NONWdON•O YINNU~p dNNOhhhhhhhPN t±¢mr~nNNPdNPhNO d.+p NNnNPOdn a+n1N Ph N~+n.~titi., '+PI ~ hNNnfdrnNPNONNdnNN~PNn X11 P'f nl.lNTNnITNTN 1 nNNn N N wN N ry w // mOOnPfpOPbfOPm rommrv»co-.mPOnK~rn n°oro `i ~ ~rc o^~ao1=m ~ v .. r m .. m T~ vi Po.+v mr.~ml-aac-~vm 1 21 pPPPPPTCPPPPPPPTPPS ii mm,:~m mir~nnnnmmm mmnmm Y _ 'J t V U 2 ~+ - u s a ¢ OZ i P t Oti D O vo~~a aw m mYS > Fuau~ yw G uKj N Pw S~Q VNLL 6~F ias JJ Wg.J.s iumg '.:o o r 'r=w' ul WJl2 Zug GtiFU Jti0 wJJUVUpiUO m~0 w uY2 C P./ ~y J F<t_Vn<r NU Or+y<_w tLL nviw <J~6 <O1 O~ O L.cJU2v ~2~-~nFO Xwin ~-C H><2<yFw<VW00~w<wwM N06JC U~n¢L<YVYLXSOLLL 6 J O b U U = 6 1 O 1 <i VWOO j .J[L < <tJi WJ4Fw ~nK •VL O tr LOCrr e ins<i~i'~ai wc~xr. z ~» w"NC ~3r~wJy iLL~<so wJiWW^U6Nt<r<JJrgij aWZ WL P I rl-~<YR ~r~r IL NRJN«2 ~Q6Zrn4 ,n v~~v~r JUJ»VtimOO m >I <1 Nor Tq~r gl~nPPgFqOPrNm LI POPmWY41 LL1pOmOM Prn PI~O N I ~iVNNgyy~Wgalql I~Nall ry /a COPY M~,, ~ , .~~ wr'"-' - Jr+r wMw wrlN AYr.r rW w-+.+IM.h~,..<.a AHlEG110N NNI ALOOf1IXlt bV/Y11W UDSgSR(fl I iYPH11 Oi tICEN5E151 ~Ilf NO. fo: OEpvxnwR d A4oxMk goro+wo Cannd gECFIrt NO. IPoI NaadweY ~ G5999T Soermr+a, Cd1. 93110 SAO E~[urdloo Olf0ala .rwaY G vSne G[OC~A/IIKa1 e. n~...e.....,un~eu~ _a_an=Dlaca COOP f5 iM InrdorA9M M.obY opplm (> DIM I:Fr:w. d..mf+.d m lollo.u ~ lM.rod Z. NAMf(S) OF AenlcNai151 _~ AppYM IArdr Sore ,9G{ Q AJUGinjii6.. AJy - 6-_• I Ellonin Oel. - s~.unco [#o<n.. Dalr. T--~ .r;[nA,v: eAr.. :wono:lAn ~ L. iYrEls) Os 1LANSACnON(11 FEE ~rwr SMFIFI, ntlm .IaY - Lau. 17 ~At <. Nemo d Ew~..r yt% Arc'LLaatq Urtac C ~ and Lp Cedo _-_- Cw~- ..___ _ I tOtAl _SFOw irpr of lr<rrn. __ C~h'.im~x+ YRF 8. Mglirq Addrw ail diprrm+lrem 31-Nunbr a:d SnwrMt ~r •..: 301 :luala [. Aae.. A, 9p1And. J. 9ry96 Pati D Navr Yeu ava Ovn <mm<Md of a IrbnYi 10 Norr i^'I rvor violmrd onY d IFO pe.n:m< of rM AI<oxob< Savrropr Connd A<I a rpYkxenf of rFr OYpan~ant prey a:nip w rF. A<Y! I I Eupian o "rf5' om.a ro uomv 9 or t6 an o. anaxmrm ..FaF J.all M dwm<d par+ d IAn oppli<otim. --~- -~------ it A(pll<vn npm. ~ I 'M anv moroW. .mpbyrd m orogh FnnW prmwl wAI Mo oll Hrr 9wllR<aFOn< a(a b«^•n. and __ L~ rMl M~VI rq olaM w w qr~-n m:r ndmiA m eV rxr po. al m. AI<vhdl<MvvapE Control Aa ` v r <avu Boa W>Hid uwv 1M S~:/e5 I] Si Alf Oi CAIIFOgNIA County of .............. ............ _,.,.. ~M...._.... ....... x..wr ti ~ .~ .. '1~. ~w'an •.. ~ ~ r If AVCIICANi • SIGN HERE ...... ___... __...__.... _... _._...... .. _....__. ._._ _ ._._ ._. .._ .. ...... ... ... AMLN:ATON b~ TRANSFERfNI z~=- 15 $iAtE OF [AIIiOPNIA County ol ..... .......... _..........._ _._ ,Doh..... _...... ._ ..... .r 4.. M1 .NmN<I of 4uYwNpY „ li Slpmrurrlvl of bnnxgvl ___T!, [ae_r Numboly I .___.L- _.___.__.~ _ ~----.__.__..-..._...__a ____.. -_~_. ___ -__i_..~__-_-_,_-_____. ~._ ._..._____ 19^loweo• NvmMr and Snrrl C'~ry end iip Cafe Ceanry On .Yal WrVr i41om iqu Liu; Fnr Orinnmml Pre Only Ono<hd. -' q«wdrd non<.. /3 .~ fidwiwy popon. ~I~-a9 n .,..._..._. ....... ..._COME$ MNIFb ... _......_ _ _ ... e+.m "brMwell Fa d...__... foida .. ............_.......,. O.Rn m...._....._.... h<Nq lla .... ..._._. ELLY'S NEW YORK PIZZA 9155 Archibald Unit "C" P,ancho Qicamonga, Ca. 91730 APN# 209-211-44 Property Presently Zoned; General Indust- rial. within sub-area 4 of the Industrial Specific Plan Zoniny or` adjacent Property; ~ n North: General Industrial sub-area 4 of ISP (p a South: General Industrial sub-area 4 r of ISP a East General Industrial sub-area 5 D of iSP ;rail service? ~ West Residential Low SEVENTH STREf]- _ 'A` .•g' ELLys Nr3/ i ~• Pizza, U~ -D ~~ 4, F" ,.. J. ,H .; Z F-~ .T" ~~I SIX FN .~~TREET /// joe torrez `(~ 05 MAY 1989 t~~PY Mao 9a9 . w.. --- -- .R.pl. w Elr w<w r.. M ~yw X,w,.,n,<p~,. y[ ~MEEtAY1W1 10f YfOMOtK ffV~lN IICp1Wf) 1, lYPH51 OF LKFNSFIS) FEE NO. T« De/er.euX d Akdnli ERwreRe CenXel IWI ied.aY Swvrp fAlE ye 4iaYM1lm Cdl JY 9A[S 4YEOAL RECEN} NO. E599)) , . ~erma+r. IM rndwpned XwR6 lwb '••w••e•r )ATnG p1~CE G[OG1AFNiCr1l CODE Jb f! Y epp liaww«dn<.ib[d«hle.u D°le Need 2. NAAIEISI DF AMUDAEXi1S) few. Mwil ..^.'MDL¢IIt® ;.uLL. 2+K. ARpR.d rrM« Sc !qY M[<Ew Daw iseuA,xa EM<Ew Dow: J[Y1L T. •1rneA1, ar 5. ME(51 a TlANlACDOw151 FEE lK. }TEE r.r.r.e. 3 +aS. )c ~a K~ w p[s Tai. +OO.OU I rT SO QeypyR da [o d) 100.!0 (~7 .. Name a MXwr .'lAn o o..cntrmt .:,L. !. l«NOn d Min..-NUwM<«y yr.n M]E f1fR~ ~_ City wd Lp Cod[ CaxXF rdt•<O~' wr Ua L...e.l... I TO}Al SIASE.N W Show }YW d tn.n<e ). M he:niw+ Inude '- CMI > i e. ASeilirp Addreu (il diR«wrr berlr ll~-NUrnW< aM llrM . .,. 9 Mw. yeu ..er been <ew,Md d o IdenYl 10. Men Yeo <.e< rwbwd wry d Me pwwiwe d dw AkMdi< Mweoe Cwwol Aq w refrrle+le« d Me Dpormwnl pw. I I. E<pl«n a 'YFS an<.« w ,wnr< 9 w ID en en ellaM«rl dX<X ddl d dee:rwd pwr d Mil epp5eolian. I p. AVYI'rwl Wrw< (al Mel wl1 rnwrnM< wyeYN u. on~d li<mrd wwrrn« .iN Few aX Ar. Vr^XA[TVn< 01 a M1<er. .and :ei rwr M .ill ml .ideM w <ww w Pe<NI w b <ielaud w d Nre pwri~we d rM AI<o1wY< Rne<e0e C 1 A t). STA}F Of UlllpMM Cwnry d._____A0.-ffW1LC~IM_____________ D.w.____. ~1451fa _, .M. ~rM1 I ~ _~ t. w.. vn.M ..< h .wry. . _ _ _ + w ..F w/n- wry ~~.~. +.~ :. h wY~n. w.nr+M. ern w w ~ ~w:n~n. ~~ M <ne w- uM w .w.rrr .,... / rG.. s .. "."~ ~ r. y I r+w. r..~ ~ .. ~ . rEreucXSrEOw ~r TuwsEeeor C«wp d_____fA° MrsR[dlm X/]i/!9 ....... ................Dew......._..._.__....___..._ wr.. .mw.r w ti. w.. ~~...~ ~" ~ ~~I:ww. ~~iA..M n Y~~. GYM 1: M r M1 Y.mn. ll M~h ,nnr. rr ~ .w.<~i...w:~~~•w ~Y.n< _rnry M~ u:nw.r ..w :nm.r _~a s+im~ww wlF~~ A~~r nrM. / +~rrw. ~ ~w 4 ~n4 ~:n...~.~r _.~/._. <. .~.... +n I6 XbmNn of t¢.meel<)_ V.S~eErrN<I,ey(a~in<li lJ IL linnv NumMr01 /.'\Y / ~~[/ I _ orta MJ.[Wn AenoA~ Suayltiuq 9 ARO[o~ ip hct _ ~~. ~ . ~_. ____ 19 l«elien N«rF« e:d SXeRI fRY~rld Lp CaM Counry De Not W<W frl«o Tlw E,irv; Fw Deprrwnrr UeR QJ~ AX«IIN: y R«wdN nalk., FM.iery pepwt / 2u ^ ...___..__.________________ ______________________COIIlS MAIIfD _____.«n/c9 _....._..__._.............. ^ brwd:Fwd._._..___._hX/a .............................OEke «..__.._.___...._.IwIRI M. ___._._..__._.___. .~ .. ~ .,.o • wi L ~,V ~ „~ EI~IIIJq. } 1 Cf~~_ murm ~.:, ..~~ 4 rq~M _G V Lti`! 1r vy4. ~`ti 'i ~L irr 4 ~~/•1 ~~ r ~.~ l.r` S.L' vkl `~ 'I rnmfevOaM .' l' L r N u Illnllll'If. ) l~ L I (/ ~ 1 r' 1 :' ~I 1 ~ ,,.~ ~. 1.~ ~1L U lLiw'1..., ~~~I `I `.~ ~~ „Ur ~~u,vu.~ci~ ~u ~ti „~ r--~ u~`-1:: q / , ~ .~ ~ u, ~J U.o4vump~'c,..v ~::~. ~ B 4 L~~ lro~ o_ ; OGG U ~ '~LY_L „'_ ~y~-~ r U Tw[SUMµ J.1 Mb!1'. ~j ~ {. ~uroMC 3 qq r~r`' ~ r.rr 11 DIMS ~ NIIgIW ~Mnwier ~ J ~ J ~ y~'K. ~i ~:r ~_, L• ~ 'ia. •• `v;=i ~ ti' k'. tJ IAANGO'S BEACHFRONT CAFE 8034 Haven Ave. Rancho Cucarrronga, Ca. 91730 RPNN 1077-661-04 Property is currently Zoned: General Commercial Zoning of ad,iacent property; North Flood Control /General Commercial/ General Industrial/ ISP sub- area ;17 South Industrial Specific Plan/Foothill Specific Plan/Haven Ave. Overlay District East : Terra Vista Planned Community/Community Commercial West Flood Control/ ISP subarea N17 /rp joe torrez 05 MAY 1989 a iw: a j ; . S F~ . t. ' ~ ~ ~ M f`4 H i3 , ~ .-. t i.. ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ i 6N I I.wema IOa MCpYK .I.../. IKMIN I. IYI(Ifl q IKHtlMI f1. ae.-`---- Ir dlwrw r ,Iw.rk ...... ~ ITpI ~~) Y .J4n ie~^CJI 1)111 .Q.T 11R Y . =. r""' ~,.... ... . .: , aMY. ri. of f,~ ~. .. . . . .,. a 91Wpfl 011NIKANryy 191! a.e)iiu..i Rlafltf . n ~~ ""1 aONA. hIM [. Iiff~wiw Le )iY 0 )Il.rr 0.1 Iflelncl If.r.~ py~ ). Ti))Ifl p fYN{)Cllaafl )0 IIL' IYII t NIY1 1f1 1f).If l IIr9 M 1~_ x I.s...l I.xifia.i. wr.lwr W { f W1w 1111. d/w~14 tMT Crwi iOIN f Nf.51 11~. T91T Alla~r _ .w n.ww wpw _ q a r.M1 br_ a rh,.w 1.. a-II.+.. r r.w m..ln-.I f•M9r 9w ww l..n awnwwl M.MrTT 16 MwFww MdMli wq•Mfn.WwMl4 ALMit Mwr~M firer b w .1liM~w d M ~~11w' 1). yflM.nl Rw. MI IM n .wr1w wrlw.l M w.i Ww1 r.W. MII Mn J M pfi111sIYw M . NwR M M1I I~w 9r .a rM wrrlwun.w lr.M `..... Mbwnwrl Mln awlr, r.wwCwrM b. li. TMf Of f.Y/ONI f_+i M..~..._ ~- .__pib ....___. 9...r .ter. w rr~., r ..~ .r .V.....w~. Yw. mow. r rr n r .Mnw . _ ~ r ~w .a. I. +/_ .+wK ~I. rr .~.y9 ..w_. ` ~r. r. Y w.n.. w in W~ Ifi Y 4 h. ~ti r Iw. ..~ ~L .. wr 4~ _ ~ .....w ti r _IY.. ~_.rww.rr ~.rwr.:.r..., Fr ~w .r~..rr w~r..rwr.r. ~ r.ww...~..r ...~..... .. .r...r~. r~~... -.... w...ti r w ...r r r _r....r _ r _.~.. w.. wrw. ri..~.. ~-....w. w +r+.. i+... wur I .~.~ P _ r .......rr..r ..rw.. M r r ~_....~ .~ ~ +..w. uM . r ~_~. 19 1r.r1uT ~9r.. .. .... .. .. .~.... uruc~taN ~r tuwlnfu I!. fT1T! W WI10)IMI f~..ry M.._ .............._......._..____dM...._......_._._.._..... .....w .4n .~~' ..~ M rw ~+w .~y~.. yM r.w . +w r~n..~~~r . a w r_.. www...w. _.r~r w.~"~ ~e ..ter ..w_rn.r . wr..w" r w w~~..r. w . ~ .`r.r ~w_r~.~.. .. ~. .r. w. w~..i ...w .r. • • V r~_ _Y~.rv~...i..47 yr. w.. _w.... ~ ..r.. iM_r.~Y .wM ~~F._w Q Ar.r~ M a..__....._lr) r ............................. wr r......_.........i1rr1Y, ....._...........__ DUPLICATE l7 D~~e i_'r y~z~ a Nr Mra M19r T)Y LLwI rw o.Pwwrt vw Oyr bwfµ o 1wMw1.w n rwwwi rwr. ~ ~ ~ N~ >~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~;~ ~' ~., .. ~ .„ ~ ~ War ;'s;i,s _;_ T w.wm w.. ^ u~r ~ ~, ---~ ~,~ p75 j NMn Habr'orl Pln~ Q~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _N~N ~MEMJE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i The Naven Wine 8 Liquor Company is located on the ~ northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Highway i within the Kmart Shopping Center. PROPERTY CURRENTLY ZONED: Commercial ZON[N5 OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: North/ Industrial Park East /Industrial park South/ Industrial Park Nest /Industrial Park E. Harms 4/89 ~~ vu a yr nna~t,nv vut,nmvtvVn MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROH: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager ~' BY: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator SU&7ECT: P~posal for Shielding Snorts Field Lichts at Heritacc and Rad Hill Community Parke Recoaendationa• City Council authorize an expenditure of $52,061.00 plus 108 contingency from the Park Development Fund tl2o-4532-8806 to Pacific Electric Company, Buena Park, CA, to install 422 louvers as designed by Custom-Cite Engineering, Tustin, CA. Backaround• To resolve a solution to the light glare and spillage problem at Heritage and Red Hill Community Pnrka, a study was conducted by Reedcorp Engineers of Costa Mesa in August of 1987. The results of their findings era shown with Exhibit aAn~ Following the Reedcorp findings, the manufacturer, A.B.S. Lighting of Bloomfield, Connecticut, was contacted to direct a solution. The company offered to work with the City but felt no obligation to pay for the corrective work. Their position was the installation had been completed as specified, and should the City have desired controlled lighting, it should have been addressed with the design documents. The electrical design consultant for the project, Lenzenni Associates of Mission Viejo, wes contacted about the problem and position of the manufacturer. The firm agreed to study the problem and offer a solution based on reaiming, louvering or a combination. The firms work though, would have to be predicated on the manufacturer supplying photometric data on the three fixtures used on the project. After almost twelve months of the manufacturer and design engineer affording excuses as to why the work was not being completed, A.B.S. Menufncturing sold to a new owner. /9 Proposal for Shielding Sports Field Lights at Heritage and Red Hill Community Parke May 17, 1989 Page Two The new owner promptly directed a latter toward options available to correct the problem as shown with Exhibit ^C". Rather than throw money at a problem and randomly install louvers as suggested by the manufacturer, alternative kl was requested to be completed. The study would provide precise calculation of the effects the louver would have on the fields. Since November of 1988, when the City issued a purchase order to the manufacturer to complete the work, a aeries of correspondence sent signals they were again stalling. First, they requested fixtures be sent back to their factory for study; next, a letter was sent stating the work would take six to eight months to complete; and than, finally they wanted payment of the $9,700.00 design monies up front. At this point, an alternate proposal that was being entertained with Cook Sales, was actively pursued by staff. Cook Sales, the supplier of the lights used at Beryl Park, was queried on the problem. They put us in touch with Custom-Cite Engineering. Mr. Frank Mike, owner of the company, has extensive knowledge anfl background in the field of light control as demonstrated by Exhibit "D". ony'aV~ou vuLLV UO V~/b1W10 ao lulluWO Cuu CiluWll 4tl Exhibit "E": 1) Light beam distribution North Star fixture used at Beryl Park 2) Light beam distribution A.B.S. fixture- Heritage and Red Hill 3) A.B.S. fixture with extern al louvers 4) A.B.S. fixture with proposed reflector modification as used with the Beryl Park fixture 5) A.B.S. fixture with internal louver The final option, internal louver, was selected as the best solution based on one; the A.H.S. fixture did not allow enough room to modify the reflector to a parabolic curve as used in the Heryl Park fixture, and second; external louver would be subjected to wind damage in our area. As a result, a louver was designed to be mounted internally within the fixture as shown with Exhibit "F". The anticipated effect the installation will have on the light distribution to the fields is demonstrated with Exhibit "G". ~a Proposal for Shielding 3porte Field Lights at Heritage and Red Hill Comaunity Parke May 17, 1989 Pagfl Three To assure the work will be completed correctly and in accordance with the o0atom-designed louver and revised dimninq diagrq that will be required !or the project, Mr. Mika, Mr. Cook and other pnrtiae we have talked with, all etnted the iaportanca of having direct control over the retrofit of these louvers (see Exhibit "M"). Based on this, Mr. Mike recomandad the lira Pacific Electric Coapnny coaplata the installation with Custoa-Cite Enginsarinq supervising the work. Pacific 8lsctric Cospany provided e proposal of $53,061.00 to supply, install, raaia and asks sny and all adjustaant to the systq to provide a corrective solution to the problq. Dus to ell the variables involved and the desire to hnvs the problem coapletad with work forces completely lnmiliar with the problsa, this proposal is being recommended to City Council. DL/aq e....i .. a~ RB~CORP BNGINB31lIG OONSl1LTING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS 2962 Retlhill Ave., Suite 280 CosTa Mesa. CA 92626 (714)549-9488 August 25, 1987 Mr. David Leonard __ City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~" P .O. Box 807 Cucamonga, CA 91736 RE: Ballfield Lighting Study For Existing Lighted Fields At Redhill 8 Heritage Parks Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Dave: We have conducted one evening review of the subject projects having taken fooCCandle readings and also reviewed plane, specifications, and shop drawings of initial designs. It is our opinion that this project e[ both sites had potential light glare factors which required detailed studies with Redhill Park having severe glare considerations. As the City is aware, any Cime a lighted facility such as your project is anticipated within a residential area, it is a bold and challenging task for a city [o remain a hero to the sports groups and yet not be villians to the residents surrounding the facility. Due [o growing public reaction to "light pollution" an environmental impact report (EIR) should be conducted for a project such as we are discussing. This is, of course, water under the bridge a[ this point. However, we enclose our office "Ballfield Lighting Design With Glare Conditions" (attachment "A") outline we use for our EZR reports or any sports Facility wish glare considerations. Were anq of these items addressed in detail during design, especially various photometric layouts, and reviewed with City prior to design (item 4 of Attachment "A" )? The following is our summery of conditions: 1. Enclosed are copies of the original photometer computer readouts with our field review of actual footcandle readings indicated a[ various points. (Attachment "B") q~~(ylp,CpppppAi~ EXHIBIT A ~a David Leonard Page Two A. A few areas could possibly be re-aimed to eliminate some excessive minimum to maximum areas (dark spots) and improve infield conditions. We feel the minimum to maximum light levels should be 3:1 or better with several of [he fields having much greater maximum to minimum levels and as much as 10:1. _ B. The re-aiming will not eliminate the glare situations with "spill lighting". The soccer fields a[ Redhill Park Could be re-aimed [o drop footcandles on Che walls of homes on [he wesC side of the complex. "L. Light Fixtuze Shields A. Light fixture shields will reduce the overall upward glox of light and reduce the dome light effect in the sky. u. .Jp _ _ _hi~ia.. u.. .~ 11 ,nA~. o s eeingychey"source" of light-for~the homes'at Heritage Park elevated above [he fields. 3. Summary A. It is our opinion the specificed fixture is aot capable of addressing light pollution and there are ocher manufacturers in the market that should have been reviewed in detail for light control. 8. We Feel the installed Eixture manufacturer should be asked to assist with review of the glare shields end re-aiming of certain poles fot reducing glare. C. There is little room for improving glare control on a protect this mice end with the type of fixture end lamp (high pressure sodium) utilized. A project similar to Chia requires greet preliminary studies with the posai6131ty that little can be done unless some fields ere not lighted or a secrif ice ie made for quality lighting versus glare control. a3 zote David Leonard Page Three This concludes our review of Che pr o,ject and we will welcome any additional questions or input you may require of us. The boC[om line to our report is that there ere not too many options on this project to reduce glare control without replacing the entire lighting fixture system with fixtures that hav glare control. Pleat cell us upon your review of our report. Sincerely, RE CO P ENCiNEERINC, INC. Ronald ~. Reed President RWR/mh Attachment a~ 8e1~ y~~+w~a.~ { , R~DCOR- BIfi1N®tNG C~1LiING RL•CfRK:AL HJGINE£RS 2902 RecMdll Ava, SuRe 28(1 (:seta Mesa. (:A 92626 (714)549-9488 January 1986 BALLFIELD LIGHTING DESIGN WITH GLARE CONDITIONS Ballf field lighting design requires the following design criteria for projects with potential "glare/spill" lighting located within residential areas: 1. Overall site plan (or aerial plan) indicating residential areas around the ballf field project. 2. Site elevations of the concerned areas. 3. Cross section elevation views through residences end ballf fields (minimum 300 f[. off playing Fields) indicating ,a .. i .... _._,a _.rod rH rol fi rrOra ibu u. uu~u ~~~ Y.. ., .•_ .. beam ChrOW9. 4. Several computerized lighting scans up to 300 ft. off playing fields indicating: A, Desired initial and maintained footcendle levels for infields, outfields, and soccer fields With desired lamp type (i.e. metal halide, high pressure sodium, wattage, etc.) B. Horizontal and vertical footcandles both initial and maintained up to 300 ft. of playing fields. C. Pole heights. D. Glare control devices attached (this varies with each manufacturer). E. Readouts to be based on a per field basis and alto With all fields on at same time if located in a cluster. S. Review of above preliminary plena tad photometric data with owner outlining the po cenciel glare concern areee. ~~ Continued A CALIFORNIA CORPORNION 4ole Hallf field Lighting Design Page Two 6. Present options and coats to owner for best possible glare control methods and if any type of control will be beneficial. In some cases, no lighting is the only option to prevent glare/spill light conditions. 7. If several fields, located adjacent to each other, are utilized at least seventy percent (70S) of the time with all on at the same time, we suggest lover designed footcandle levels per field. Ambient light from adjoining fields will increase. 8. Provide lighting control for reducing lighting A. Infields "on" separate from outfield (and soccer if located xi Ch in outfield). B. Separate soccer fields have each side controlled seperaeely and/or by one half lights. 9. Review the three basic lamp types available A. 1000 watt meter halide R 150(1 wnrr mnrnr hnlidn C. 1000 watt high pressure sodium Each lamp type has a pro end con benefit over each a[her from initial costs, maintenance, light coverage, and light control. 10. Review basic spill/glare light areas with owner. A. Spill light is considered the horizontal footcandles that can be read with a footcandle meter on the ground. B, Glare light has txo basic concerns: o safety hazard glare o nuisance glare / Continued Borer Ballfield Lighting Design Page Three Glare light may be readable or unreadable light on a vertical plane (vertical foo tcandles). This may be light on a wail or home and may not be readable by a footcandle metcr but the lamp source is seen similar to bright head lights' from an oncoming car. If the bellf field. is near a freeway (on/off ramps) or airport, the glare may 6e a safety hazard - although footcandle readings ere too low to read by a meter. 11. Receive a letter from the owner stating Chet they are aware of all preliminary design studies except a particular lighting design being considered. 12. Indicate on plena A. All design situations including glare consideretiona. B. footcandle levels, maintained, for playing areas. C. Special aiming for light control off playing areas. U. i,iare concroi nyace w. E. Penalties to flxture manufacturers/contractors for lighting not meeting design and carrecCion of inadequate installation. 14. Final field review to include: A. Thorough footcandle readings for compliance with design. B. Re-aiming of fixtures as required. V eo~e ~~^- -'~° ~~~ ABS Ughting 13 9~i1bn Orhe, aboiMleM. CorxixriNl 08002 rebpiaie iza31 z~3-zsla October 27, 1987 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Dear Mr. Leonard: In reply to your letter of September 15, we have reviewed the computer readouts, along with your notes regarding readings on the fields and neighborhood complaints as to spill light. You are absolutely right as to what should be expected and there is no question that some of the fixtures are not aimed properly. It is practically impossible for us to determine which fixtures are aimed too high, but some are. The soccer field is completely misaimed according to your readings and this may be the culprit but it is hard to say. We believe this prohlem can easily be corrected as follows: 1. The contractor should take the aiming diagram sent by ABS and set pie plates at aiming points on the field. 2. ABS will send out a gun site specially designed for aiming uur Series 9000. This will allow the contractor to aim in the luminaires during the day. We developed this instrument for contractors who are not familiar with aimi.nq in sport fields. R E C E I V E D NOV 0 21981 CIiY Of O4NON0 OUC~MMipA COMMUNITY F.ENYICES EXHIBIT B loll City of Rancho Cucamonga -2- Oct. 27, 1987 After this has been accomplished, there may be a few fixtures that are annoying to neighbors simply because they can see the light source. If that is the case, this can be corrected by adding louvered shields to those fixtures. Our representative, Mr. Jack Fraser, is very capable of determining which fixtures will need these shields and can advise you. ABS Lighting hoe numerous sports fields throughout the United States and to the best of our knowledge, all are satisfactory to neighbors when aimed properly. As soon as you can make arrangements with the contractor to realm the fields, let Mr. Fraser know and we will send the gun site out to him. I wish to than you for using ABS products and sincerely hope you will continue to do so whenever the opportunity arises. Very truly yours, ABS LIGHTING CORY. Edward A. Slater President ERS/bak cc: Jack Fraser, Lectric Sales of CA ~9 zo,~ \NJ ,a eAOnanw, amos :~,~.~~ September 9, 1988 6outhcoaet Lighting 6 Design 18457 Amietad Ave. Pomtain Vnlley, CA 92708 Attention: Jack Fraaez Deer Jaekx This ie with reference to the City of Anncho Cucamonga and more ePeciPically, the lighting at Heritage Park, Red Hill Park, and the igne pollution problems related thereto. Ae we see this situation, there nre three alternatives that can be taken to reduce light pollution skyward and pollution into neighboring areas. Alternative 41 is to teat all beam aprenda used on these jobs utilizing louvered shields. Since there are five fixturn types involved, there would be five photometric testa required. At 5500.00 per east, it would coat 52500.00 total. Top shields would not require testing, since upward lighting doaa not affect fixture performance adversely. This test data would be used to compute affected lighting data for all 402 fixtures involved. Total estimated tame is 120 hours of computer time. At 560.00 par hour, tie coat would total $7200.00 Added to the photometric cost of $2500.00, our ovi of pocket eoet is $9700.00. To amortise thle coat over 402 lixturee the cost would be 524.12 p•r fixture. Add to thin the cost of • louvered shield et 555.00, totsl coat would be 579.12 per fixture, or 531,810.00 total. seP z s n~co 30 EXHIBIT C /~/9 Southcoaat Ltq. -2- Sept. 9, 1958 Alternative 42 would be to acknowledge a 209 to 259 light reduction (based on Metal Ralide datel and simply add shields by visual identification. Since top ehlelds could be used in some cases, the total coat of the ehielda could be held down. However, aesuating nll shields to be louvered, the cost would total 522,110.00, not counting instsl lation. Alternative t3 would be to simply inetell top ahiel8s only as wsa done on 3tageooach Pnrk, Carlsbad, CA. There were 134 top shields involved, and they apparently have been installed effectively. The price of the tog shield ie 527.50 each Por a total cos[ of S11,OS5.00 for 402 fixtures, not counting installation. It would seem to me, that Alternative 43 would be a poaeibil- 1ty after reviewing Stagecoach Park for appraisal. Alternative 41 will, of course, require up front money of S9T00.00 before we can proceed with tearing and computer work. Allow approximately four to five months to complete this work. Slncerely~ A8/6/L_~IGRT/~IRG CORP. ~../ ~Y Ci~~`~~~~/ Renry Schifisr President RS/bak $EP'~8 DECD JAI aa~a Engineering Experience Frank J. Mike, Owner Nearly 20 years o£ experience in the lighting industry in the South- ern California area. ESnployyed by Steber M£g.Co.o£ Cali£.(1958),Pyle- National Co. and Steber Div.(1959 to 1970), Hubbell Lighting Div.,Harvey Hubbell,Inc.(1971) Left the Hubbell Lighting Div. in 1971 to form, with Paul Waterbury, the Mike-Waterbury Corporation now MWC Lighting).Vice- President o£ Mike-Waterbury Corp., responsible for research, develop- ment, design and production engin- eering (1971 through 197$). The following are some examples of innovative design work in luminaires lighting systems and production and laboratory test equipxente Application Engineering ~~ \\~ ~ ~ \\\~ ~~ 5' 10' s` fo' 15' 1T ]r' to' aovnctn[ xelsnc = zo• Ale Sn6 Folnt • 2B• (50° Cron vars.) Cee e . (W°) .647 Dletams 7y' Squan °f Olat. 1769 Cardlopo.er = ,~}0 Horizontal P°oteane lee V °~F~zlC Oa B) Ho rltantal Fcotca,M lae ~~(.647i = • 10.50 PactcuMLe Lighting Systems ~, • ~ 1 1 ~+ Sx)Lpp 1~0 ~ 1` ' n~ n e, =i ~ ~ 1 ~Q ~_ `, ~I q ~. ~, .l 1 ca ct ez D•a .~~-e-~-~;~r- . < - - ( 111 I I t '~ max. \,t~ ~ , Luminaires. Low-Bay HID. First low-mounted in- dustrial Mercury Yapor fixture with Plexiglas diffuser-reflector (Pyle- Steber,1967},This design also manu- factured by MWC Li hting(1972), and The Miller Co.(197~). Installations throughout Western United States. This concept was also developed and adapted for office and classroom use with a quiet, thermallyy protected integral ballast,and a 4'dia. flisc- ahaped diffuser. Installed through- out Social Sciences Bld Universi- tv o awa7. n ono u u.~fAF((';T9T4~ High-Mast HID. First modular pole- top Mercury Vapor cluster incorpor- ating lowering device and fabricat- ed from (maintenance-free) Cor-Ten Custom-Cite Engineering ~ 775 West Main Street,Tustin,CA„g26ao Telephona)(714)872-7609 EXHIBIT D Design & Development Steel.Designed and developed for the City of Huntington Beach. Installed throughout Central Cit Park Hunt- ineton Beach.C tg.,1973 ooo~m j) ~ . a m e mm llll ELectrleal -._~~ J:m \\ Phatusetrlc 1 O Li hg tingesstems. Race Track Lightine. First multi- level, computer controllable light- ing system utilizing 2000 1500 Watt Tungsten Halogen floodlights(3 Mil- lionh'atts total cormected load).De- signed and developed for Los Alami- tos Race Track C ress CA .Installed in 19 le- teber . Stadium Lighting_ First system uti- lizing 1500 Watt u~etal Halide Lamp (developed by Pyle-Steber) in West- ern U.S.Installed at Rose Bowl Sta- dium Pasadena CA. (Conn.load reduced by 25 , footcandle levels increased by 900 aver old system.(1969) minaire Testing Computer System ~~ t~J _ l~~ Pvrometar Con eroi •~•-' " ~ ~ Conioaeter Control Analog to gi¢ital Converar 0 `_=" o -, i Central Pro- ceee na Un1C ana vlaeo I l i / ClID lii r_- oa M„~ o~, .S4 "asa4 Test Eouiwnent. Electrical. First production Test- ing Console for testing assembled luminaires under full load (1965, Pyle-Steber P1ant,L.A.,CA.jin West- ern U.S.Design revised and upgraded for Hubbell Lighting Div.,(BUrbank, CA,Plant,i971)and several new units built.Design further improved(1972, MWC Lighting, Santa Ana Plant), and plans for new unit furnished to The Miller Co.Emeryville,CA.Plant(1973) Photometric. Anaiog computer system designed and built for processing IrvineeCAic197tU;:(Pyle-Steber Plant P rtabl Goniom t r. Designed and bu It in 1971 MWC Ltg., Santa Ana Plant) for testing luminaire opti- cal systems. CUStunt-~It@ Engineering 735 West Main Street,Tustin,CA„92680 33 Telephone~(714)832-7609 .~ ~ .r u ~ ~.. . ~ P = ; - ui ~ T ~ v ~ ~' ~ ~ W v ~ ~ J , L =1 i ~~. Y ~~\ J ~ V f ~ ~~ ~ "~ ~ .I 3 y - y~ ~ 0 ~) 0 0 7 a UI 1 W 1 Z N ~ h ~ i- e ~ `~ = F1 2 u r ~ ~ O V ~ ~ ~: ~O I. ~~ f j N N 3 ~~ O ~ ~ ` ~i i l~ 's I: i MIBIT E 1 d '~ ~ ~ ~ u 0 J ~ i ~ ~' W 0 U M i U ~ ~~ `sue U J :~ r ~~~ U ; ~~ W W~ ~~ J N r ~ Y f"' ~.. P r ~'~ --1. - - - --- :. ~~ J ~ 4 ~ ~ Y .'. n U ~ n° i ~ ~ ~ J (,~ IIl s a 6 0 A r / 1 / 4„' ' N~ / ' + r ~ ~ !L ,~ I 1 N i+ d ,~' NI ~I./ ~ w ~5 I 1 Z a V I T J ~ J\ /~ D S ~ r U ~ e 'y .w l9 ~ J y x v ~ ~''' ~~ N J .P .~ ~i _ -._._. In H~ T .~ z o Cr\ ~ G , W \ I i e, L ,\ I ~ X ~~ ?i -I a F ~ G c l LL ~ ~{~ ~ P 4 ~~ 1 ^ Y `~ V l t5 rM K L J v (~ f ~fi 4 n s n S 1 J vl U ~~ ~ ~~~ 3 IA :1 `i U r ,~ T J N LLI h ~ I ~ `~ 19 ,,f°-1 3 '= ~ 0 ~'n _. .... i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 'i~l us ~~ iN ~ ~% ~~ 4 n i'~ ~ ./ CI/ ~/ ~ .~~ •i Q• G r 1 `.'1 "V 0 ~ I- Vl / e - M N ~ ~ ~ ~j/--~ h; u ~~ n 4 ~ J T ~, ~ :~._ ,i t ~ __. M ~ , -~_I ~, ~~ n ~ r~ ~ P ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ S "99 T i ~ ~ ~ 7 ~' J h ~ _..,r. _~- 3 ~ IT-- ~ ---{ .. LL Y l~ ~.1 - ~ `1 ~ - W i ,+ 0 1I ~ M U w ~~ W 7 O^ ~Si t 9 . . H „ J a ~' W 4 U v ~# Z ~ 7 ~ ~ Z ~ ~ D 3 ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ (J ~ 1 u 4 ~ Z ~ I I i I ^~ I+I ~ I ~ ' I i I 0" -- _~ I J I ` I_~_ i -~ r 37 ~ . N l ~V 7 ~ U ~' d LL J ~ ~ ~ 0 m {- ~ M U f ~ y 1. ~ Ky ~~ 0 N M v `v u n 3 W i 7 ` ~a ~ ^ v -' :Y w n ~ 1- u ,, W ~~ J LL d u i r (s F ~ z ~ J ~ I ^ n b ,, „/1 y 3~ ~' v 1 O ~ 1~ ~'. U ~` ~I 1,l . --~ _ ~ L V P d 1 0 u v u ~ LL j L ~ u T 0 u y~ 22 F t~ 0 ~ ~ i ,r 'M o s `~ s U N ~ 2 T u 'n J '~ 7 J W a C v 7 h x LL _-~ _. ~i NTI 9 /~ / '/ ~r/ I r ~ ~ " V~ ~~/ / I y Q ~~ JV NJ~~~i~ ,, Z ~ ~ ~ t u ry^, V 1~ ' ~ /~ ,, r q ~~ ~ J j J v ~ a J d U Q N ^ a 3~ J •~ 4 M F :~ '^^~ ~ 1 W u I^T~ v l P N 1~ J a u. Q i p r ~ i 4 • \/ ~ ~ N M 4 ;., w .. h J ,~ T ~ ~ ~ J 3 T ~ N { J f 0 2 v W c ~~ ~i tl J .~ ~ .. r JI v ~r ~ '~ 7 v r H Y ;,! l/ ^ [ V ~ ~ ~ . ~^ r 11 5 1 J ~.1 ~ ;~ !r ~- ~~ .. N `= '.~ o L , ~ ~ ~ N O +y C~ ~ ~~ r J E- "' q ~ ~ ~ ~ °n r ~ ~ ~ n {~ ~ U N) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i -~ i , i v~ ~T ~ ~. ~i ~N I ~~ ryl F• 1 N r N I ~ i N ~~' d~ r 7 v E T F' T. W ~i W ~~ ..o~. ,_ ,`~ ~, ~r, M~ c~ 1 n T .~ 3 (~ W J. N ~ ~~ iii u!1 Q~ . v i 4i ~' J n _~ M U J 2 U N v 0 Z Y ~ ~ U ~ 1 nl / " 7 L ~l ~i~ a n .. A rl M ,.a r_ ~ rl .t v H p yj a '! { l\ rI .S ~ ~ _ ~1 "1 \^ ' ~ r h 0 :1 J 1 ~r 1 ~ n i 0 I" i 3 li ~ 1 ,~ ~ i V ' I ; ~ ': (\ i-- - ;~ ,\ ~1 0 _~ '~ dl ~ ;~ n ~, o rl ~ N qry 1 1 d r~ JAI NI I ~ u - _ ~ j J J Il ~ ~ i• e< N 7 tl ~1 ~ 1 \' • J r11 1~) 1 ~l ~~ ~ ri f[ ~ i ., o LL LL /I P J ~ i ~ s " ~~ _i ~ ~j ~~ 7 F o- ~ ~ o ~- u 2I ~• T fl r• 7 s L E%MIBIT Q H uI ~ ~ " " LL LL LL n O _~ M J Q V v 9 n ~ I, 0 4I O 00 LL r LL /~ h J ~ - v 17 v 4 LL ~ l~ R • s i J I L I ~~ s ,; ~' ~ M l a ~ ~ _ ~ ~n I--.. ~ I ~ ~-- w ~. \ 1 .~ 7 \ I \`I, I o a In 0' f ~ 0 JI A I 'n , r ? MI I I •'~ N .~ - 1 ~1 \I I ~ N I~1 N ~ d~ ~1 I I~ h ' f ~ N ~ ~ --I- - _~~ a I „; r ; Q I 1 i /// i I _ ._.. _. ~ o V W J ~ ~ ~ //// $ ~'' _ ~ Z ~ 3 1''~ LL o T R J U V 40f4 LL LL G h ,.. i) n ui :. -+ M .. r ~. ~I (~1 ~I + vl J In ~ «l S 0 , l ~ ~ W 7 N ~1 ~ - Y u V J J ~ u LL j ~ J 0 `~ Z~ ~ yi Q 6 e ~ ~ N F N .~ r n ~ LL LL 1 __ i 11 J Q -. 0 1 J ~7 ,~ 1 -~ ~ -. J~ ~~ O v U ~1 '~ m Z .l ~r ~~ 1 2 Y ~~ Z (f 1 :i J J .~ 0 9 'u4i 0 J o a ~'~ M t. i !; O J J n J O rIJ W ~9. (~ J ~ r Z Q' .~ h `'° ~,. ~ p '~ ~ ~ J 1 :. J ~ ~J ~ \ \ '~ N S~ ~~ aor+ 1 0 ,~ n ~ ~; ~ n ~ J O Y 1 "~ ~r t N. ~ 1 IIL,, r rl µ s 9 0 0 M i O 0 0 v 111 __-. 7 s 0 J 2 S1 S Y 3 n r ~ i °~ : J 3 ( i . ~+ # ~1 O ~I Q ~ 4 Z q • ;Y ~ ~ I U ~ J L ~ v W I ~ r ~~ t0/{ J~ ~~ April 25, 1989 cook sales and associates inc. Dave Leonard City oP Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SubOect: Louver Installs a cn and Re-aim uig of Red Hall and Heritage Park Lights Dear Dave: The Proposed custom designed internal louver, for sub 7ect [:oodl:ahts,<drawing dated 3!7/89 previously !oral sl'~ed by Custom-Li to Engineer:ngi has bean specially designed far a total cutoff angle of 45 deareas abcva the beam center <"beam axis"~. The 65 degree angle was arrived a! as a romp:umise to reduce the ob tectaonab le glare, whale at the same tame minima+_ uiy tt.a l osa of light levala <f ooceamileal on the playing fields. A wader cutoff angle would have been insufficient to aontrcl glare and the mote customary and nu rower 30 deuces angle would have resulted in a much greater loss of Cield light levels. The custom louvers, that wa an tend to furnish, wail minimize the glare problem by blocking and absorb:ng some partamis of the floodlight booms ant this wi Ll result in some foss of light 1 we:c nn f.hw fields. However, careful and accura ce ad;7us Unent caiminy~ of Che lights will be instrumental in alleviating this condition by focusing as much of t.ha light-heams as possible onto the playing fields to creato a good, even distrihucion pattern. For Cie se reasons, chi proper installation of the louvers and the re-aiming of chi light fixtures is, needless to say, ni the utmost importance. It should also be noted Ghat these louvers hue been tlesigned to fit inside the fixtures rather than era ernally mounted as woo id be supplied the the fixture manufactu: ar. Due to trw niyi, wir.:1 conditions crevalant 1n your area, this is necessary to prevent tlamaye to the lauvefs and more importantly prevent additional wind loading (stress) nn th• poles. The Pacific Eler_tric Co. of Busna Park. Calif. have specialized for many years in the inscaliation and ma ufcenance of outdoor lighting equipment. Sinc• 1976 Pacific Electric. has worked on many occasions both with the Cook Sales Agencies as wall •a Custom-Cite Enginewriny on pro 3acts involving louver installations and/or aiming of tloodl ugh is in sports and recreational lighting. In view of their many years of experience and success :n this field, Paei tie Electric comes highly recommended and to eminently qualified f.o undertake the RECEIVED ~.s EXHIBIT H (y~qy 0 31989 lola 1577 Eeat St. Garlrude Place -Santa Ane. Caldorme 92705 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONIG (714)549-9882 FAX (714) 549.8473 p ry spacial•zod work required of this pro,7 a rt. It you have any qurstians Dave, please give me a call. Sinc•r~ly,_ i '!~ ~~Y_ ~ i~ _ Jo• Cook Coot Salas and Associates. Inc. / r 1011 niTt) ITL. 9 A Ail.[lll liT i/i A 1f/V.TIi A STAFF REPORT ~~ ~ ~ ~ K ~ C f $ ~ Date: May 17, 1989 U ~ ~~~ To: Mayor, Members of City Council, and City M agar From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manegax Subject: Agenda Item: Agreement between the C y oP~ Rancho Cucamonga and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District for Vse o! Etiwande High School staff racoaende that City Council approve the Agreement 1»twean the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga and the Chaffmy Joint Union High School District for the use of 8tiwenda A1gh School property !n Sieu o! limited annual maintenance. etsft further recomunde that funds for maintenance ba expanded from Enginaexinq~e Park maintenance Division~• personnel and fringe benefits accounts (01-4647-1100 and 01-4647-1900) ~GEGB~i ..yh '- '- auiAtifiiu uG dii aa:.alli.ui: sii.u to ~renovata/improve ~exietinq open apace (pleyfielda) !or joint school/commmity sport usage. This agreement allows the Community 9arvicas Department indoor programming space for recreation activities for limited annual maintenance (i.s.) aeration of their playfielde. Coate for designing nn improved use of their playtields era currently being finalized. This would include lighting school fields for school sports and sport usage programmed through Community Services Department. JS:ba ~~ Between The City of Rancho Cucamonga And The Chaffey Union Hiqh School Dietriat For Use Of Etiwanda High school THIS AGREE[~NT entered into on the day of , 1989, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereinafter referred to as "City^, and the Chaffey Union High School District of San Bernardino County, hereinafter referred to as "District^: WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the District desires annual maintenance to Etiwanda High School, and the City desires limited use oP certain District facilities for community purposes, and; WHEREAS, the City and the District deem it to be desirable to cooperate in the establishment of such en agreement under the conditions hereinafter set torth, now, therefore, it is agreed as follows: 1) The City shall provide limited annual maintenance to Etiwanda School playgrounds that includes: aeration of the soil, upkeep o! ball diamonds and other items of mutual benefit. ... _ .., _ .".) +'::. ..~ t~ bhuii yia„i, w Li,n City, in rnuoyniEion of the preceding, and without Pee, the mutually agreed upon use of the pleyfiel3s, after school use, Por public recreation programs. 3) The District shall grant to the City, without Pea, use of mutually agreed upon use of multi-purpose facilities at Etiwanda Hiqh school, for the conduct of City supervised and sponsored community service/recreation programs on a prescheduled basis, outside of normal school hours and school program schedules. 4) In the event that emergency maintenance and/or repairs are required to the eforamentionad District facilities, that is, work necessary to insure the protection of the Facility andjor the safety of its users, the District reserves the right to close their respective facility from user access until the maintanenca and/or repairs are completed. 5) City shall protect iointly used facilities from damage, or mistreatment, or misuse during use periods. In the event that facilitiaa or equipment era damaged am a result of their use, the necessary coat or repair or replacement shall be paid by the responsible Agency within to days of receipt of invoice. ~~ 6) Tha District and the City agree to hold harmless, indasnity, and defend each other, its elected officials, otticers, agents, successors and assigns, from and against all clans, liens, encumbrances, actions, lose, damages, causes of nation, expanse and/or liability, including court coat and attorney's fees arising frog or resulting lro~ lose or demaga to property or injury to or death of parsons resulting in any sannar whateoavnr dlractly or indirectly by renson of the City or District's operation of the said portion for their sole use. Tha District and the City shall prcvida each other with insurance coverage with respect to said indsmnlty in amounts, tors and content approved by the Agency. Said aoveraga shell ba mnintainad by the City end District, end the City ahnll supply to each other cartilicatae indicating the existence of said coverage prior to each school year. 7) This agreement say be amended or tersinated at any time by mutual agraesant of both parties. In addition, District or the City may tarminets this agragent with or without cause at any time during a school yaer, effective at the and of the school year. Communications and notices shall be addressed ae follows: City District City Nanagar 3uparintandent City o! Rancho Cuaamonga Chaffay Joint Dn. Riqh Sch. 9320 Awww TA nw RA. wnlfw n ?ii vqt a~w atrOCt Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ontario, CA 91764 WITNESS THE EXECOTION HEREOF the day and year first above written. City of Rancho Cucamonga Authorized Signature Data Chaffey Joint IInion High Sahool Authorized Signature Date ATTESTED: City Clerk Data ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 To: City Cauncil and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Richard R. Cota, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc., for the preparation of Design Plans, Contract Specifications and Engineer's Estimates on the Lemon Avenue Stona Drain Improvements starting from Aslethyst Street east to the Lower Alta Loma Channel between Archibald and Henlosa Avenues. The per diem not to exceed fee of 540,150.00 (536,500.00 plus lOt contingencies), will be funded by the Drainage Fund Account No. 23-4637-8863. RECOMMEMUATION• It is hereby reconssended that the City Council approve, award and execute the above suD,)ect Professional Services Agreement with J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. The proposed Lemon Avenue Stans Drain frost Amethyst Street east to the Lower Alta LOala Channel 15 intellueJ IN Ji1'CLL aLu(,N diiJ iiuiSdBCc uiwff "ithir storm drain pipe to be placed under Lesion Avenue. This proposed drainage system is part of the City's Master Planned Storm Drain System for Lemon Avenue. The ranking of the proposals submitted and their associated fees are listed below: Ranking by Proposal Proposal Context Fees DGA Consultants, Inc. (47,358.00 J.F, Davidson Associates, Inc. f36,500.00 Associated Engineers, Inc. 559,970.00 The firm of J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc, is recommended based on the strength of their proposal and the associated fees. Respec 1 s ttted, (tE/j/M R16C~am-~-"' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager ~C.•- FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Richard R. Coto, Associate CTvTI Engineer SUBJECT: Approval for award and execution of the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and~DGA Consultants, Inc. for the preparation of Design Plans, Contract Specifications and Engineer's Estimates for watershed Area XI1, 7th Street Storm Drain between Center and Haven Avenues. The not to exceed fee of 531,636.00 (528,160.00 plus l0Y contingencies) will be funded by Assessment District No. 82-1 R Funds, Account No. 83-4637-6028. [t is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the above subiect Professional Services Agreement with D611 Consultants, Inc. BACK6RODiD/ANALYSIS The proposed storm drain facilities will supplement and provide consistency with the now existing originally master planned facilities. Said master planned facilities were designed for Q100 year flows to be contained within the right-of-way and Q25 year flows to be carried 1n stores drains. The ranking of the proposals submitted and their associated fees are listed below: Ranking by Proposal Proposal Context Fees Centennial Civil Engineers, Inc. (59,428.00 DGA Consultants, Inc. 528,760.00 J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. =41,160.00 The firm of DGA Consultants, Inc., 1s recoamended based on the strength of their proposal and the associated fee. Respe y ~ubm1 ted, RHM:RRC:p _ Y-- cc: Jerry Fulwood Bonnie Cabrinha ~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 ~"~-~C..- T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to execute a Professional Service Agreeaw'nt with Austin-Foust Associates, Incorporation for Traffic Engi~reertng for the rc-opening of Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and San Benito Avenue with a connection between Highland Avenue and 19th street aL San Benito Avenue, and the traffic studies for the related General Plan Amendment REC01/EIDATION It 1s recommended Lhat the attached agreement for work on 19th Street - Nlghland Avenue, as described above, b! approved and executed by the City. Ai so covered is necessary related work on Haven Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue. The fee will be a maximum of (10,540.00 to be funded from the System Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8852. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND This consultant work is necessary to complete plans and specifications and process a General Plan amendment to connect 19th Street with Highland Avenue as shown on the attached exhibit. This pro,~ect was approved by the City Council on April 19, 1989. The traffic engineering consultant will assist the civil engineering consultant, Don Greek and Associates, in the design work, will prepare the related traffic engineering plans and will prepare the report for amendment of the General Plan to permit final construction. The civil engineering consultant was approved at Lhe May 3, 1989 council meeting. Aespectf bmltted, -~"_`~ RNM:PAR:1y Attachment .7 J L ~ ~ I~ U iI ~ ~ I L. Q J ~ f i AV NOW3l~ CJnln~ ~/ W Q >~¢ aT u ~ ~"_ a ~o Z Q //m r 1 wl w - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VS~cCCnMOh 7 c ~ .n r _ O O ~`` ~. ;I mo..-L F ' ~ Z ~ \ r"rsf~ 1977 iel \ t i 2'C E f i~'c,:id m T-1~ r ~I I h'y/~~OI \\`f r \\ ~, \ •.y \ y33b' .j ~ d +w ~ ~ i o . , Q~ J J ' 'f ~"~' ~ O ~ ~ I l~_=~ ~ v v 1 ~~~LJ i~ '.e ~ l 1 ~~ a i ~~ f ~ 1 1 1 ~ f ~ i z i >O jdfS 1 ~ ,P , '\~ ,~3 CITY OF RANCHO CliCAb10NGA STAFF REPORT GATE: May 17, 1989 ~1(' T0: City Council and City Manager ~J~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Red HT11 Park Drainage Improvement Protect awarded to Harris Construction for the amount of 5200,105.00 (S1B1,914.30 plus lOS contingency) to be funded from Cap1W1 Reserve Funds Account No. 25-4285-7043 (Awarded May 3, 1989y RECOMMENDATiOM: It 1s recommended that C11;y Council authorize the Mayor and City Cierk to execute the contract documents for the Red H111 Park Drainage Improvement Pro~ecL, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 5200,105.00, (5181,911.30 plus l0i contingency) to be funded Pram Capital Reserve Funds Account Mo. 25-4285-7043. Background/Anaiysis .~~ vu ;vn~ ~, ~rra, ~;;~ wui~~;i dwu, JeJ uin iuujm:L y, uje~L w riarri> Construction. Staff has rccetved the executed contract documents, bonds and Insurance documents; rcvlewed them and found them to be complete and 1n accordance with the contract proposal. Rasp 1 s fitted, RHh: RB:s~m cc: Purchasing 5`~ -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA s1a-, STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Shintu Bose, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for installation of a portion of a Master Planned Ston Drain Facilities in connection with development of DR 86-13, located south of 9th Street, approximately 1300 feet east of Vineyard Avenue, between Arrow Vineyard Associates and the City of Rancho Cucamonga - ORA-09 RECOMEIDATIDN: It is recommended that the City Council approve Lhe attached Reimbursement Agreement, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of DR 86-13, Arrow Vineyard Associates, the developer, was required to construct a portion of the City planned drainage facilities known as Master Plan Storm Drain Line 6H. The above required stores drain facilities have been completed by the developer, and have been accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The developer has submitted an itemized statement to the City to be reimDUrsed for construction casts of said master planned storm drain facilities. The developer has also requested to be refunded the drainage fees assessed to the developer at the time of issuance of the building permits for the initial phases of development of the pro.iect, said refund being considered as a direct reimbursement by the City to the developer for construction of :ai^_ master storm drain facilities. The staff has reviewed the statement for the construction costs submitted Dy the developer, end has determined that f206,783.00 tan be credited towards the direct construction cost of said Master Storm grain Ltne 6H. 5S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 86-13 May 17, 1989 Page 2 Per the attached Agreement, the City will refund to the developer the sr of 538,666.64 paid by the developer for the drainage fees for Lhe initial phases of the development of the protect, and will not assess the outstanding drainage fee obligation of 570,933.36 for the remaining phase of the development, all as a total direct reimbursement of 5109,600.00 towards construction of said stores drain system. The reauinder 597,183.00 witl be retatiursed to the Ceveloper, per the terms specified 1n the Agreement. Respect submitted, r/', ' ,_.. Rte: ~. Attachment ~~ i i MASrE.4 STOR.'/' o/PA/N L/NE 6N© d is.aru ..F: N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~~ STIXiM DRAIN LINE 6H ~~: REIMBURSEMENT ACREEMENf;DRA-09 ENGIIQEERIIIG DMBION E7~ I S/ REIMBUasEIENr AGREniENr FOR PIJONED ORAIRIIGE FACILITY CONS7RIICTION THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 198 by and betweenNCH0 CUC a orn a, a mun c pal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Arrow Vineyard Associates hereinafter referred to as "Developer", provides: NITNESSETH NHEREAS, in the opinion of the City it is necessary that planned drainage facilities be constructed for the proper drainage of Developer's development described as: D.R. 86-13 NHEREAS, the Developer, at the Developer's own expense will install the planned drainage facilities hereinafter described, and; NHEREAS, the cost of constructing the planned drainage facilities hereinafter described will exceed the planned drainage facilities fee, which will be payable with respect to the development under the provisions of Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and; NHEREAS, Section 13.08.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides: "SECTION 13.08.080: Construction by Developer -- Reimbursement. Nhenever the construction of planned drainage facilities is necessary for the proper drainage of a subdivision, the City may require the subdivider to construct such facilities with credit being given by the City toward any fee Dayment required by this Chapter. If the cost of such construction exceeds the fee which would otherwise be payable with respect to the subdivision, the City Council may, at its discretion, enter into a reimbursement agreement with the developer, in the event a reimbursement agreement is entered into, reimbursement shall be made only after the fee required by this Chapter is collected in connection with a subdivision or development on other property in the area encompassed by the reimbursement boundaries described 1n the reimbursement agreement. The basis of reimbursement shall be the develoDer's actual cost of construction of the planned drainage facilities. NOM, THEREFORE, the Darties hereto agree as follows: 1. the Developer will, and at Developer's own expense, furnish all tabor, equipment and material, and pay all costs incident to the instailation Tn accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer of the City, the following planned drainage facilities: `~ 1 Master Stone Drain Line 6N, Per City Drawing No. 1135-D 2. Installation of said planned drainage facilities shalt be completed in conformance with the provisions of the Improvement Agreement for DR 86-13. 3. The City Engineer shall inspect and test the planned drainage facilities at the expense of the Developer, and after any deficiency discovered by said Engineer has been corrected by Developer, City shall accept said planned drainage facilities for public use. 4. City shall not be responsible for aqy loss or damage to said planned drainage facilities prior to their acceptance by City. Developer hereby guarantees and warrants said planned drainage facilities for a period of one (1) year following the completion and acceptance thereof against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished. 5. Developer shall protect, indemnify and save harmless City from and against any and all claims, demands, and causes of action of any nature whatsoever, and any expense incident to defense by City of any such demand or action for iniury to or death of persons or toss of or damage to property occurring on Developer's development, or in any manner growing out of or connected with Developer's construction, repair avid maintenance of the planned drainage facilities described hereto, or in arty manner growing out of or connected with arty deficiency in workmanship or material furnished in connection with construction, maintenance or repair of said planned drainage facilities. 6. City hereby agrees that in consideration of Developer's installation of said planned dralnege facilities, City will not assess Developer the fee described in Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which fee with respect to Developer's development would otherwise be the sum of f109,600.00. 7. City further agrees to refund to the Developer fn a lump sum following the date of this Agreement, the planned drainage facilities fee of (38,677,50 previously paid to the City at the time of issuance of the building permits for the initial building phases of said development; said fee being a portion of the total drainage fee obligation of the developer in the sum of f109,600.00 specified in Paragraph 6 hereof. 8. For the amount that the actual cost of construction of said planned drainage facilities (see attached Exh/DTt "A") exceeds the sum specified in Paragraph 6 hereof, which said excess amount is hereinafter referred to as the original reimbursement sum" the City shall reimburse Developer, only as and when fees are collected under Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and only according to the formula hereinafter described. Haunts to be reimbursed W Developer shall be determined as follows: 5~ A. Fpllowing completion of construction the Developer shall submit all cost data to the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall then determine the actual cost of construction, and such detenaination shall be final. 8. Mnually, at the end of each fiscal year, the City shall set aside into a "planned drainage reimbursement furHf" twenty-five percent (25%) of all fees collected during the fiscal year under the provisions of Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. C. The Developer shall be eligible to share in the planned drainage reimbursement fund commencing with the fiscal year which ends following the date on which said planned drainage facilities are accepted by the City. D. The Developer shall be eligible to share in the planned drainage reimbursement fund, then no Later than two (2) months after the end of such fiscal year, the City shall pay the Developer, from the amount set aside in the planned drainage reimbursement fund, a fractional share thereof determined as follows: (i) The numerator shall be the original reimbursement sum far the Developer and the denominator shall be the total of the original reimbursement sums for all Developers who are eligible to share in the planned drainage reimbursement fund for said fiscal year. 9. All of Developer's right to reimbursement hereunder shall cease as of the end of the fiscal year ending ten (10) years after the fiscal year 1n which the Developer first Detame eligible for reimbursement hereunder, whether or not fully paid. 10 Nothing 1n this agreement shall entitle Developer to reimbursement of a sum Tn excess of the original reimbursement sum. il. Vayments may be mailed to Developer at the following address: 12. Developer may change the mailing address by written notice delivered to the City Clerk. 13. Rights to reimbursement due under this agreen~nt may be assigned after written notice to the City by the holder of such rights as shown by the records of the C1Ly. Such assignment shall only be effective only with respect to payments becoming due and payable more than thirty (30) days after receipt by City or written notice of such assignamnt. City shall not be required to divide any payment to be made hereunder. In the event it appears from the records of the City that more than one (1) person holds the right to payment hereunder, the City may deliver the full payment to any one of such persons and such payment shall be deemed payment to all. ~J 14. The City reserves the right to at any tine increase or decrease the fees payable uAder Chapter 13.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 15. If the fee established by Chapter 13.08 of Lhe rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereafter declared tnvatid or unenforceable, or collection thereof is otherwise precluded by law, all Developer's rights to reimbursement hereunder shall 1a~ediately cease and terminate. 16. This agreemont shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. This document contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to Lhe subject matter hereof. Th1s agreement cannot be modified except by an agreement 1n writing, signed by the parb against wham the enforcement of any waiver, change, modification or discharge is sought. Subject to any provisions herein to the contrary, this agreement shall ih all respects bind, and inure to the benefit of, the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of each of the parties. IN NITNESS NHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement at Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the day and year first above written. CITV OF RANCHO CUCAIgMGa OEYEIOPER ATTEST: e APVROVED AS TO FORM: ty ttorney OOCIaERT TO 9E E1fECUiED IM TaIPLICATE oEVaoDEa's slsraruaE Musr eE aoTrtalzm Wr STATE OF CALIPOgMIA 1 ss. COUNTY OF SAN BfaNAADiN01 On this dsy of 19 _, Mfore w, the undersigned, a Nopry Pu6T~e ~ and for sa a parsomlly appxnd Yillt~ 5. Messen e~r,~Jr_.~ known Y4 ea W De the President of Mlasseneer Ifrvestnant~osww: as oLTff rnia Corporation, tM coryonttan exKU r n ns aM known to we W M tM person who executed tlN within inatruwnt en behalf of said tdrpOratt011, Said curyJPi:.:. ~!:!~ ~!!!~ to r to be a general pannier Of t r Partnersht Yi a Callfornfa Ltarltad hrtfrrshlp, and au gw/wr.i y:. ««r ssenger Partners., a Californ/a Banoral Asaoclags, a G11forn1a General aF'~r oars P, pa r ip thet executed tM Mlthin lnstniwnt, aM acknowledged to ~e that such corporation executed the saw as suM partner and tMt such pertnershtp executed the saw. WITNESS MY NANO ANO OFFICIAL SEA1. ~ gna f'e 6a ~~~ I Ep1IBIT 'A' CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR A PORTION OF THE MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN LINE 6H CONSTRUCTION ITEMS * CONSTRUCTION COSTS Item 1: f 73,251.00 Item 5: 31,641.00 Item 6: 7,646.00 item 7: 1,701.00 Item 8: 11,259.00 Item 9: 2,129.00 Item 12: 1,000.00 item 13: 504.00 Item 14: 361.00 Item 16: 222.00 Item 17: 367.00 Item 18: 27.00 !tin 19: 223.00 Item 20: 164.00 Item 21: 574.00 Item 22: 1,352.00 Item 34: 1,023,00 Item 35: 638.D0 Item 37: 1,367.00 (Reduced) Item 42: 210.00 Item 43: 274.00 Item 44: 188.00 Item 45: 363.00 Item 46: 105.00 Item 47: 1,272.00 Item 48: 2,372.00 Item 49: 4,024.00 Item du: o,6irir.w Item 52: 3,095,00 Item 53: 2,443.00 Item 56: 2,234.00 Item 59: 492.00 Itm 60: 3,302.00 Item 61: 2,010.00 Items 62, 63, 64, 65: 28,963.00 (Includes credit) Item 66: 7,241.00 Item 67: 700.00 Item 68: 2,731.00 Item 69: 715.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST f206,783.00 TOTAL DRAINAGE FEE CREDIT (109,600.00 REIMBURSEMENT SUM f 97,183.00 * The numbering of items specified in Exhibit "A" correspond to the numbering of items specified in the statement dated 12/8/88, submitted by Messinger Investment Company, on f11e in the office of the City Engineer. Y~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: M0.y 17, 1989 To: Mayor and Members of the City CousM:tl FROM: Brad Buller, Ctty Planner BY: Ban Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Approval to award and execute Agreement for Planning Services with CM Engineering Associates, Incorporated, for various punning services to be funded by Contract Services Account No. OI-4333-6028. I, RECOMtENDATION: It is recomaended that the C1ty Council approve e su ec con ract with CM Engineering Associates, Incorporated, and authorize the Mayor and the City Cierk Lo sign the same. II. ANALYSIS: Due to an increasing workload and vacant staff pos ons, primarily with plan checks and inspections, staff has found Tt necessary to obtain consultant planning services. This will enable plan-checking and inspections to continue Tn a timely manner. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the contract as to °-- --• Copies of the contract with CM Engineering Associates, Inc. are available in the office of the City Clerk. R act Bra er C1ty P anner BB:DC:ko CONTRACT FOR PLANNING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT 1s nmde and entered into this 17th day of May, 1989, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIpNGA, a munidpal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "City", and CM Engineering Associates, Incorporated, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". NITNESSETH A. RECITALS (i) The City desires to obtain the services of the Consultant to assist the City Planner 1n the performance of the duties imposed upon the City Planner in reviewing, checking and approving plans submitted to the City in conjunction with development proposals and Inspecting same. (iT) Consultant represents that it is quaiifled to perfona professional services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NON, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, agreements and undertakings hereto set forth and the faithful performance of them) and each of them by the respective parties, the parties agree and undertake as follows: AGREEMENT 1, Term. This contract is for the Lena of one (1) year from the date of execution oTthis Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated by City upon the giving of a written 'M)tlce or lermlOatlon° to consultant at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified 1n said ibtice. to the event this Agreement Ts so terminated, Consultant shall be compensated at Consultant's applicable hourly rates as set forth in ExhTbTt "A", on a pro- rate basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. Consultant shall provide Lo City any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawtngs, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final ford, prepared by Consultant as of date of termination. Consultant may not termfnote this Agreement, except for cause and upon giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to City at Least ninety (90) calendar days Dr1or to the date of termination specified in said Notice. 2. City's Responsibilities. The City, acting through its City Planner and his desT-gna~.e redpresent=atTves, will do the following: (a) Furnish the Consultant with copies of alt standards, guidelines, criteria, regulations and other written materials having specific application with the City and used by the City to govern the checking of pions: and -1- (b) issue to the Consultant various plans for checking, after having given them a preliminary screening for adequacy; and (c) Assign priorities for the order in which plans are to be checked; 3. Consultant Responsibillttes. The Consultant shall do the following: (a) Provide Debra Meier as the personnel exclusively responsible for providing professional planning services hereto, generail described as including, but not limited to, as plan checktngy protect review, Inspection, prolect management, preparing various planning documents. The scope of services for oily other planning services desired, or provision of services by any other personnel of the Consultant, shall 6e as mutually agreed in writing 6eMeen the respective parties prior to comaencement of any such additional work; and (b) Check each plan and/or inspect each project assigned for conformance with City standards and requirements, in accordance with the procedures established by the City Planner, and with principles and practice of Urban Pianning, Architecture and Landscape Architecture; and (c) Return to the City Planner plan check prints or Correction Notices marked to indicate the deficiencies or return comments in a formmt acceptable to the City Planner; and (d) Ifien a plan 1s found to comply with City requirements, the rn •A tint nA ill ln~~n ~M,~ A.. 1 ri~~~ d d"'tii~ "ui. "APPROVED",+and return~satd plan~to the City Planner;«andr "~ (e) When a pro,~ect is inspected and found to comply with City requirements, the Consultant shall Indicate this by signing and dating the inspect/on Record Card ("Jab Card") and submitting a copy thereof or a statement to that effect to the City Planner; and (f) Meet with Ctty Planner or his designated representatives for a review of pion check comments, Correction Notices, project review comments, etc., as required. 4. Time for Perforwmnce. The Consultant shall complete his work wlthTn the follow ng max mum mes: (a) Far the initial checking of plans, ten working days from the date of receipt; and _p_ ~( (b) ~FOr subsequent checking of plans which have previously been checked, five workim~ days from the date of receipt; and (c) For field inspections, within two working days of request for inspection. Consultant and City shall agree upon certain days of the week when inspection services are required. If plans cannot be checked because of information needed from the person preparing the map or plans, the Consultant shall have the option of marking the deficiency and returning the plans to obtain the missing information. Once begun, checking shall De completed wlthln the time limits specified in (a) and (b) above. A corrected plan will not be attepted for checking unless all comments on the previous check have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Consultant. 5. Rush Pro,)ects. A plan check will be accepted on a rush basis only with the approve o e City. Pro,lects checked on a rush basis will not be permitted to delay the processing of previously submitted plan checks and will be subtect to the following rates and times: (a) For the initial check, five worktng days from the date of receipt; and (b) For subsequent checks, three working days from the date of receipt; and (c) (burly and maximum rates will 6e as set forth on Exhi6lt "A". 6. Pro~ett Status and Billing. The Consultant shall keep a record of dates when worF s r-T~vea a'~i:urned, of time scent, of the status of each map or set of plans, and of other pertinent information. This infornmtion shalt be sent to the City at the end of each week. At the end of each month, a Dill for services performed during the month shall be sent to the City. 7. Compensation. The City will compensate the Consultant monthly at the rates shown o~Fn x f6it "A" attached. 8. Confitct of Interest. During the life of this contract, the Consultan s a no pan c ec any services performed by Consultant for any private client for any land development wlthln the City of Rartiho Cucamonga. 9. Non-exclusiveness of Services. Consultant acknowledges that City has entered, an trey n e u re en er, into contracts with other ftrms with services identical to those described herein to be performed contemporaneously with the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that 1t 1s not the ezcluslve provider of the services hereto described to the City, and that nothing contained 1n this Agreement shall obligate the City to provide Consultant with the same or a greater or lesser volume of work than the City provides to any other Consultant pursuant to a similar contract. -3- ~~ 10, Insurance. Consultant shall neither commence work under this Agreement un has obtained all insurance repaired hereunder in a coagany or companies acceptable to City nor shall Consultant allow arty subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. Consultant shall take out and maintain at all times during the tens of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Norker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, Consultant shaTT-TurnlSTi ~o Ci yl; a cerETfieai:e of insurance as proof that it has taken out full worker's compensation insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. Consultant, prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with City a certification as follows: "t am aware of the provisions of Sectlm 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement." (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, af~suT an s so a cos an expense, Consultant shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of City Consultant, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and ii abiiicies ror personal injury, ceacn, or property damage arising from Consultant's activities, providing protection of at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (5500,000.00) for bodily Injury or death to any one persm or for any one accident or occurrence and at Least Five Hundred Tha:sand Dollars (1500,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: Not applicable (d) General Insurance Re irements: All insurance required by express provlt on o s reemen s a e carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraph 8.(a) and (D) shall name as additional insureds City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. A11 policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer, Insured and all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation against City and City's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by City; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to City Dy certified mail. Consultant shall furnish the City with copies of all such policies -4- Y V promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. Consultant may effect for its awn account insurance not required under this Agreement. 11. Indemnificatfon: Consultant shall defend, Indemnify and save harmless y-CfE~l-acted and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by Consultant of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of or incidental to the actions of the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximua extent permitted by law. 12. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of aqy part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by Consultant without the prior written consent of City. 13. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that Consultant and its employers, o~'f cer~d agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of City. 14. Governin Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance w e aws of the State of California. 15. Notices and Oes1 noted Represe_n_ta_tive_s: Any and all notices or demands be peen a pa es ere s a e e ressed as set forth in this paragraph 15. The below named individuals, furthermmre, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: City of Rancho Cucamonga affn• non rnlnwan Gninr Dlanno~ 9340 Base Line Roed, Suite 8 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 CM Engineering Assoc., Inc. Attn: oon Campbell P.O. Sex 6087 San Bernardino, California 92412 ARy such notices and demands submitted by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight (481 hours after deposit thereof In the United States am11, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 16. Attorne 's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce aAy e~lsion of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorney's fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. -5- Y / 17. EM1re ree~ent: Th1s Apreeewnt supersadea arty end all olhar agree~ents, e r ra or 1n wr1t1~, betreen the parties with respect to the subiect getter Herein. Each party to this Agrensen! acknowledges that no MprosMtatton by any party rhleh 15 trot enbodled herein nor ero oMar egreeeent, stateawmt, or proetse trot contained in this Agreeunt shalt be va11d and bindingq. Aror egdtfication of this Agreaaent shall be effaetire only if 1t Is in rriting signed by all parties. tN IRTNESS NHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Apreee~nt as of the dey and year first set forts shove: CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONOA CONSULTANT n s ou , or CN Engineering Associates, Inc. AITEST: er y e e , y er APPR0I~I AS TO FORM: or „°- a er, nner -6- 7/ EXHIBIT "A" MAXIMUM CHARGES Hourly charges will be billed at a rate not to exceed $45.00 an hour for the first 120 days of the contract period. For the remainder of the con- tract, the hourly rate will be E68.00 per hour. Charges for rush jobs will be 50% greater than those listed above. 7a STAFF REPORT DATE: Mqy 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FRgA: Russell N. Maguire, C1ty Engineer BY: Steve M. GT1111and, Public Norks lnspecto~~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMIEIDATION: The required street improvements for Tracts 12802-2, -5, -6 Storm Drain have been completed in an acceptable manner and Tt Ts recommended that C1tY Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f13,400.00 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk W release the Faithful Perforwance Bow in the amount of 5134,000.00. Background/Maiysi s Tracts 12802-2, -5, -6 Storm Drain - located on the southeast corner of Mt. YTew Dr1ve and Spruce Avenue. DEVELOPER: Lewis Nomes ii5o Nortn Mountain Avenue Upland, California 91786 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f13,400.00 Release: Faithful Perforwwnce Bond (Street) f134,000.00 Respectfu 1 bmitted, RHM:~Mt,~s3m ~~'~ Attachment 7.3 RESOLUTION NO. $~- ~ ( D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 12802-2, -5, -6 STORM ORAIN AND AUTHORIZING THE FlLIN6 OF A NOTICE OF COIU'LETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public ieproveeents far Tracts 12802-2, -5, -6 Store Drain have been coepleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Coepletion 1s required to be filed, certifying the work coeplete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeonga hereby resolves, that the work 15 hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and f11e a Notice of Coep/etton Mth the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council PRgA: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L, Aicorn SU&IECT: RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT RECOMMENDATION: Nork for the folloring tract has been completed and the cash epod sft~~ie amount of (500.00 is hereby recaeaended by the Planning Division to be released to: AMOUNT OF TRACT N0. DEPOSIT 12991 (500.00 BB: ns PURPOSE DEVELOPER Subdivision Sign Shelburne Development 7s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 ~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecto~_ SUBJECT: Approval of Ipprovement Agreement Extension far Tract 10035, located on the vest side of Camino Predera south of Red H111 Country Club Drive, submitted by Rancho Associates RECOMIlIOJ1TIOM It is recapended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public iaprovements for Tract 10035 were approved by the City Council on March 21, 1985, to the following amounts. ~aithiui rerrormance pond: >i~i+,wu Labor and Material Band: f122,000 The developer, Rancho Associates, is requesting approval of a 90-dqy extension on said Tmprovement agreement. Copies of the improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Re spec/ful Ma/ttte~d, RHM:SM6:sd~'~ Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ( ~ ~ I t A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IIWROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IIPilOVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10035 NHEREAS, the Cify Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeonga, California, has for its consideration an IRroveaient Agreement Exknsion executed on May 17, 1989, by Rancho Assoctaks as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-wAy ad3acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Camino Predera south of Red Hill Country Club Orive; and NHEREAS, Lhe Installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreeaent and sub,~ect to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,tunctTon with the developamnt of said Tract 10035; and NNEREAS, said Iagrovement Agreement Exknslon is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Iagrovement Security, which 1s identified Tn said Improvement Agreeamnt Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho CucaaxHtga, California Hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Exknsion and said improvement Security be and Lhe soak are hereby approved and the MaWOr is hereby authorized to sign said Iaproveamnt Agreement Exknsion on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RRNCHO RSSOCIRTES, LTD. R California Joint Venture partnership. Western Development, Ir~c. S United Heme Vent ur•es, Inc. UNITED HOME VENTURES, INC. Managing partner. 519 Madison Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43604 F'ost Office Eox 7i~i~U-311 Rancho C~acantonga, CR 91701 F'ebr~.iary 27, 1949 Czty of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office box EU7 Rancho G.tcamonga, CR 91TU Rtt: Mr•. Steve M. Gilliland P~.rbl is Werks Inspector SUEJECT: Expiration of Irnprovernent Rgreement antl Securities for Tract 10035. Dear Sir: The p~.rrpose of this letter is to request extension of Irnpr•~~vmer~t Rgr•eement for Tract IUi~35. the last improvements to be c~mpletetl cm this tract is surface storm water drainage ana sewer- access road preserrl iy andar wrmlr u..u~~i. The delay ir, the completion of these facilities has been a res~.ilt c.f the ir~abil¢ty to obtain proper permits antl c lear•ances from Setherr~ Pacific Transpor•tat ien Company. For mere than two years we have been negoL iat ing for perms ssaor~ to eriter• their property to install thre¢ energy disi patores that wo~.ild have transfered storm water over their property to the flood channel. This lack of caoperat ian has caused ~.ts to re-eng ir~eer this project prow id irig fcr other routing of storm water to the flood channel, not requiring entry on Rail Read property to accomplish. It would appear that a benefit of thts r~ew approach is the el irninat ion r,f fiat ure need for nernrnts and/or clearances from Sathern Pacific Transportation Crnnpar~y for normal rna lot enance ..f this facility. The engtr~eering fcr these changes titled "Sew¢r Access Road Madificat ion" by Mirn Mach Engineering, 814 S. Eucl itl Rvenue, Or~t ari~~, CR 9176c', drawing rn~mbered MME JN 88056 ar~d dated 12-e1-1988, has been approved by the City of Rancho Cucamr.~nga E~.il lding Depertrner~t and Cucamorig County Water District. Thrs cnnstr~act ion is presently in progress with ant lcr pated c~~rnplet ion with in ru r~ty days. 7~ Rs instructed you will find with this letter of request: "Impr~~vement Rgreement Extent i.~ri" pruoer•Ly executed and notarizetl in triplicate along with the Fee in the amount of f 251. u0. I am having transmitted Eo yuu antler separate cover from F'acif is Nations Bank, 4E65 MacgrLhur Court, Newpcmt Beach, California 98660, new security certificates to sat isfv the req~.rirements of this requested extension. if I can be of further ~ssi5tance please atlvise. S ir~rrerely, ~ ' Kenneth K. LeEay, Field Manager United Hdmo.. '..Q:,.a.-~-, Managing Partrrerv~ ?9 l~iTV /1 STAFF REPORT v DATE; May 17, 1989 TD: City Council and City Manager ~~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. G11111and, Public Works Inspector ~~~- SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12642, 12935-44 Landscape, located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Kaufman and Broad j REC01/ENDATION it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,iect agreement extension and securl~ and authorizing the Mayor and C1ty Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the Dublic Improvements for Tract 12642, 12935-44 Landscape, were originally approved by the C1ty Council on March 6, 1986, to the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: f822,000, Labor and Material Bond: f411,000. The developer, Kaufman and Braad, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of Lhe Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respecttfully submitted, .f +_ .,~j~f RHM: SMG ay Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. U / ' ~ I~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADPROVING IMPAOYEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEI~NT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12642, 12935-44 LANDSCAPE NNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 17, 1989, by Kaufsan and Broad as developer, for the ' improvement of pubiic right-of-Nay ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue; and NHEREAS, the Installation of such Improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJeCt to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,junctton with the development of said Tract 12642, 12935-44 landscape; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and acco~anied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Ciq~ of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension an behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. b/ Kalman aml am W o18ouKwn CaMlaNa. Ma. ^'a~.J c-n~,g p~,~s ~~~ 5.ia ; "d 3Jd Y:/'a Kaufman A Broad April 21, 1989 Mr. Steve Gilliland City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P.0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ,,, , RE: Tract 126:2, 12935-44 Landscaping Dear Steve: We are hereby requesting a one year extension of the development agreement for the landscape improvements on the above referenced tracts. Revised improvement and landscaping plans will be submitted for approval by the City before April 30th. Completion of these improvements and modifications are scheduled to be completed immediately thereafter. very truly yours, I(AUFMAN & BROAD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION o yL=_ Michael J. Geddes Director of Development MSG:dal cc: Duane Betty Paul Byrnes, Marlboro Development Corp V - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT _~ , DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector-y+~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13697, located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Carrara Street, submitted by Daly Homes RECOMMEMNITION tt is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subfect agreement extension and security and authorfzing the MAyor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13697 were approved by the City Council on June 2, 1986, in the following amounts. ratthful Performance aond: >oiv,uuu Labor and Material Bond: f339.600 The developer, Daly Homes, 1s requesting approval of a 6 month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, RHM:SG:diw Attachments $3 RESOLUTION N0. g9~~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13697 WHEREAS, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on Macy i7, 1984, by Daly Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Carrari Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,iect to the teens thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13697; and NNEREAS, said improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 8~ Aorii 25, 1989 7_eve M. Gill i.a nd Ci'y of Rancho ~::ucamonga Gnginee:inq Division 7. 0. Box 807 3a nchn 6samon7a, Cp 91730 Subiect: Tract 13697 Imozovement extension Aq ree meet Dear Mr. Gilliland: On benalt o£ NADFT and Daly Homes, I respect£uiiV request that an extension be granted for a or.riod o£ six months, to 10/7C/89, The ma iority of imozovements are currently romo:ete and construction u'_ housing units underway w: t!•. f'nai ins oections anticipated Erom June 1 to September 30, 1989. I thank you in advance for youz consideration. Any nuestions can be directed to me at ;7141 987-8024. Re50eCt£tlli V, Peter Kuchinsky Constz uction roozd inatoz PK:tm U rnmv nc n w winvn n, ~n ~ a.rnwrn e STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspect~~' SU&IECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13425, located on the north side of 19th Street between Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Gienfed Development RECOMEIDATION It is recoamiended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13425 were approved by the City Council on April 20, 1988, in the folloMing amounts. . raichfui reriormance pond: >oZ3,wu Labor and Material Bond: 1311,500 The developer, Gienfed Development, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension en said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. AespeFtf tty submitted, %' `~ ~..~ _ r RHM:$MGad j Attachments V RESOLUTION N0. ~~~ ~ I~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13425 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on Nay 17, 1989, by 6lenfed Development as developer, for the . improvement of pubitc right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of 19th Street between Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13425; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified Tn said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign Bald Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and tM City Clerk to attest thereto. GLENFED DEVEWPMENT CORK gGIENnV.E FEOEAAI COMFWrv April 25, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Enineering Division Attention: Ma Steve Gilliland Dear Sirs: Re: Request for extention o£ improvement agreement for Tract 13425. Improvement Agreement for Tract 13425 was issued on January 20, 1989, prior to our starting to grade to allow G1enFed Development Corp. to complete 19th Street between Haven and Highland. Nineteenth Street has been completed and opened up, but G1enFed requests an extention of the Improvement Agreement of approximately one year, in order to complete 71 homes that are designed for this tract. Interior curb and gutter are scheduled to be completed in May. Storm drains and sewers are in place. Water and utilities are ..i C3 ~nL 1:F4 SCne4U1eP t0 UC UUII11l1Cl.CU lil Li,C ui~iith -f uiuj, uuu .~ r~ ~~~.. of paving will be in place by the Eirstuweek of June, 1909. We will begin pouring house slabs in June, 1989, and completion of the entire project is expected by February, 1990. Please advise if further information is needed. Cordially, William R. Willis Vice President G1enFed Development Corp. WRWimm~ 1915.00 V -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. G111iland, Public Works Inspecto~r~% SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13476, I located on northeast corner of Heilman Avenue and Tryon Street, 'i submitted by Nest Venture Development ~ RECONEIDATIOM It is recgmaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGRWND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13476 were approved by the City Council on May 4, 1988, in the following amounts. faithful Perfonaance Bond: ;228,000 Labor and Material Bond: ;114,000 The developer, Nest Venture Development, is requesting approval of a 4-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respe~rtfiitTy submitted, {{ ., ,) `~f ~,.-~-- , - A1W:SMG-isd Attachments 4Q RESOLUTION N0. ~q ' Vr"' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13476 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on May 17, 1989, by Nest Venture Development as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms Lhereof, is to be done in con3unction with the development of said Tract 13476; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~ WEST VdVfIJRE DEVEWPMENf COMPANY April 25, 1989 Mr. Steve M. Gi1111Md City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Engineering Division 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 -'~ c..,. BfE.;~nG :iA un u;_N Re: Application for extension of Iaprovanent Agreement for Tract 13476 Dear Mr. Gillilande We ere herabv reauaetina en 4 mnnrh ogre^.e S^^ ^f `!:o Improvement Agreement for the above mentioned Tract. water and Sewer .are completed. All but the final coot of paving is completed. we are in proaeaa of c~pletinq the airy sidewalk, yet to be done are common Brea lendacaping end parkway landacapinq. Bncloaed are three originals of the Improvement Agreement Extension form end a check for 5251.00 Thank you for }roar consideration Ln this matter. Sincerely, i ,..u ~ 'i~.lL•fi~- Susan Avon bleat Venture Development Co. /ee 5345 Ba~.boc Bowevaro ~ Suds 225 ~ Enci4o, CA 91316 ~ (818) 344-2000 ~ FAx: (B1B) 344-0153 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspect r~_ SUBJECT: Approval of improvement Agreernt Extension for Tract 13118, located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Paragon Naves RECOBEId1TI0N It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authortzlry the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13118 were approved by the City Council on April 2, 1987, and extended on May 4, 1988, 1n the following amounts: ,.... Faii.i,i ul iar iu, r,iCn uww: iw~ """ Labor and Material Bond: (400,000 The developer, Paragon Homes, 1s requesting approval of a 4-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectf ubmitted, ,) K/~ RHM:SMG: Attachments v RESOLUTION N0. ~- ~ / A RESOLUTIDN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFDRNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIDN AND II~ROYEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13118 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on Mqy I7, 1989, by Peragon Names as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-w4y ad,acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally Located on the east side of Haven Avenue and between Lemon Avenue and Banyan Street; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms Lhereof, is to be done in con,{unction with the development of said Tract 13118; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, TI~REFORE, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hercDy resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same aro hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~3 ~" ItEGEIYE~? 1aoinyore .amines; 9iec. ~r;. • (I . , .,. . Apri 1 28, 1989 L7tY CF 7A~ICIIO .L':6M~'NCd ENC~NEEP,IN6 OIYIiION Mr. Steve Gilliland City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re= Tract 13118 Improvement Agreement Extension Dear Steve: The street improvement corrections are currently under way and it is anticipated that all repairs will be completed within the nett four (S) months. Due to extensive curb and sidewalk repairs, it is necessary for us to reques! a four month extension. If you have any questions or need further information please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, PARAGON HOMES, INC. 'Gary Ca talde ccib~ /JJR /,S:A ~ liivn, .!.we /IX1, ~ lama .!/,mra, Pw(ybmo ,904A/ ,'~ IP/J/ ~f -llJl 3os /P1J/ ,~I-6E'7/ . !/arG2q ..Idler: ~ Q. Edom 9ldJ, law ~i/o,Yim-, Cu4.6rvra ~yP/06 ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Millie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 12057 and Ordering the Mnexation to Landscape Matntenance Dlstrict No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance Dlstrict Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 12057, located at the northwest corner of Feron Boulevard and Helen Avenue, submitted by Nestern States Development RECONEIDATIpI It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Mep 12057 and ordering the annexatton to Landscape Maintenance Dtstrlct No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance Dlstrict Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Parcel Map 12057 was approved by the Planning Coeetsslon on January il, 1989, for the dlvtston of 1.81 acres of land into 1 parcel in the Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 31, located at the northwest corner of Feron Boulevard -d 9:.1„-: ui1 ~ i nV C11YC• The Consent and Natver to Mnexation form st9ned by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's bfftce. Respettfuil~awbeltted, ~.~ Attachments ;~. RESOLUTION N0. U~ ~ ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 PARCEL NAP NUMBER 12057 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 12057) NNEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 12057, subsitted by Mestern States Developsent, and consisting of 1 parcel, located at the northwest corner of ieron Boulevard and Hells Avenue was approved by the Planning Coasiission of the City of Rancho Cucasanga on January 11, 1989; and MHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 12057 is the final sap of the division of land approved as sham on said Tentative Parcel Map; and NNEREAS, all of the requiresents established as prerequisite to approval of the final sep by the City Coundl of said City have now been set. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 6y the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucasonga, California, that said Parcel Map Mo. 12057 be and the sale is hereby approved and Lhe C1ty Engineer 1s authorized to present sale to the County Recorder to be filed for record. -( iP RESOLUTION N0. 8 ` d Ig A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL IMP 12057 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance 0lstrict No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance District"l: and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of CMpter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 197?" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this roferonced to the Maintenance District; and 11HERERS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or iii iuy ui mi iuyiuear~a neyu, L'. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLOMS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this 1eglslatlve bogy hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown 1n Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including tTieT of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 47 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 Q F Peron --~ i ~ 1 B/`d s~ CTP! 0~ L1NCH0 CQCAILOIWA ~> COUM'Y 01 Mll D~IA~DII~10 y `~- aTA'PS 0~ CAT.Q~OEMA _ N E1fNI8IT 'B• PROJECT NAIff: PARCEL MAP 12057 (DR 87-30) N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 1.81 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 3.62 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. DOL13J~G~ 2J 500 1 --- --- --- --- --- 6 2 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT UI]LI ILL OU. JN UtlL IMMC 3 Feron Boulevard Nelms Avenue Turf Ground Cover Trees .ly. iv. J4• iv. id. --- --- 15 JAA:S/17/89 ~~ STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: NT111e Yal6uena, Engineering Technician ~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by M.J. Brock and Sons ~I RECq~EIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, accepting the subiect agreements and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements. Background/Analysts Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, in the Low Medium Development District, were approved by the Planning Commission an December 9, 1987, for the division of 65 acres into 232 lots. The developer has submitted previous agreement and security and was approved Dy Clty Council on uctooer y, 15t1d. The Developer, M.J. Brock and Sons, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction on Banyan Street - Bridge at Deer Creek Channel Tn the following amounts: BANYAN ST. -BRIDGE AT DEER CREEK CHANNEL -TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857, 13858 faithful Performance Bond: 5229,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5114,500.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfull 3ubm'tted, f RHM:NVaA~__ - Y- Attachment ~~o RESOLUTION N0. 8q-~ IT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IWROYEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY OF TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 NHEREAS, the Tentative Maps of Tract No. 13748, consisting of 232 lots, submitted by M.J. Brock and Sons, Subdivider, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in Lhe SubdlvTsTon Map Act of the State of California, and to compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Mep of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Iagrovement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security. NON, iHEREfORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGII, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor 1s authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Cle^k is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, suD~ect to approval as to fora and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 1 Banyan St. F Lots 56-67 1ve. Parkway Lot A, Tract I 1, Tract 13857 Ave. Median lot A, Tract 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $N(IIIri&E[tII~iO DIVIBtON /\ N rrn~ T%~,d~~,c~ ~~ ~~a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONvA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mqy 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Millie Yalbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, improvement Agreement, improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 13359, located on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road, submitted by H.K. Neim Incorporated RECONEIDATIOM It 1s recommended Lhat the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13359, accepting the subiect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13359, located on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road in the very low rcsidentlal District, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 27, 1988. for the division of 3.79 acres into 6 lots. The Developer, H.K. Heim Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 2166,200.00 Labor and Material Bond: S 83,100.00 Monumentatton: S 2,700.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available Tn the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts. The Consent and Matver to Annexation form stgned by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respsubmitted, RHMSJiY.JAR: sd Attachments /03 RESOLUTION N0. Qq. ~d4J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPRDVENENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVElENT SECURITY, AND FINAL IMP OF TRACT N0. 13359 NHEREAS, the Tentative Nap of Tract No. 13359, consisting of 6 lots, suMaitted by H.K. He1a1 Incorporated, Subdivider, located on the east side of Sapphtre Street, south of Hiilside Road has been sub®ttted to the City of Rancho Cuca~onga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided to the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in coagllance with the requireaents of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the F1na1 Mep of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith Por approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the soak is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Cierk is authorized to attest thereto; and ^.. T`aL °tC I«yroY-,.zr.' :.":.oTt'v' t: "c.^~.cC ,.: y:r.: and sufficient, subject to approval~as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map dellneaLing same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. /D RESOLUTION ND. 89'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TD LANDSCAPE M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13359 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously Pored a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street LigAting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"1; and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NNEREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance Dtstrlct; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without flotlce and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMgNGA HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legtslattve body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown 1n Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance Distriet. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance Dtstrlct, including ~TieTof all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. /~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 i~ ~~ Ih W IQ h ~Dk ty~vi~w Cl'PT OI RANCSO CIJCAYONGA s~ OOUNIT 01 MN B>I>:NAtDIIQO . ~~ y ~; SPATS o>r cAt>ro>eirtA N re Exiitelr •e• PROJECT NAME: TRACT 13359 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 6 d/u N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 6 units STREET IIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lams to b~e Annexed District No. b8W(-95IIOL I~WU Z2~37:506 1 --- 1 --- --- --- 2 3 --- --' --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT U15Lr1Ct Ne. ~tYeet Na! 1 vtnaxr Avenue Cowaunity Tra11 Turf Ground Corer Trees ~a. rt. ~u. tt. Ea. --- --- 14 6,747 --- --- JAA:5/17/89 ~D 7 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician ', SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement SecuMty and I Ordering the Mnexatlon to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 13304, located an the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes of California i RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13304, accepting the sub3ect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13304, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain Yiew Drive in the Low-Medium Residential District, was approved by the P1annlna Cnmxi cslnn nn May 27, 1987, for tho A7W Ginn of 11.13 aerae into 59 lots. The Developer, Lewis Homes of California, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Labor a Material Bond Bond Mountain Yiew Drive From (557,954.00 (278,977.00 TR 13273 to Base Line Rd. Terra Vista Parkway East f421,296.00 (210,648.00 From Milliken to Mountain Ytew Drive Storm Drain Base Line Rd. (616,155.00 f308,078.00 Base Line Rd. Milliken to (326,000.00 (163,000.00 Mountain View + 28 feet of North Rd, east of TR 13304 Street Improvements 5166,255.00 f 83,127.50 ~~ CCSR TRACT 13304 M11Y 17, 1989 PAGE 2 Copies of the agreesent and security are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received fraa Cucawtonga County Mater District. The Consent and Waiver to Mnexation fora signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respec/tfyl lYsub/ni tied, RHM:MY~d Attachaents /D~j RESOLUTION N0. ~q~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURTTT, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13304 NHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13304, consisting of 59 lots, submitted by Lewis Homes of California, Subdivider, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain Ytew Drive has been submitted to the Cify of Rancho Cucamonga by sold Subdivider for approval 6y saki C1tY'as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the F1na1 Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said F1na1 Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That Bald Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor 1s authorized to execute same an behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and c. That saiu improvement aeuuriiy is acueyixu as yuuu and sufficient, subject t0 approval as to forty and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map deltneating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf oP said City. ~r ~ RESOLUTION N0. g~' ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE1fATI0N aF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AIR) STAEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT 13304 MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the Lena of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets a~ Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"I; and MHEAEAS, the provisions of Article 2 of CMpter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and iA1EREAS, at this Lime the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenanee Dtstriet; and i1HEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with Lhe City Clerk Lheir written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tiff CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are ail true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exh161t "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "R' attached hereto to the Ma1ntlnence District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including t e evy of all assessments, shall be aDPlicable to the territory annexed hereunder. // / ~x7~ibi~ ' A88E88MENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~~,,_ CITY O! =ANCHO CGCAri0Il0A ~ ~R ~~4 COUNT! 0! Ml1 D~1IANDQfO a. '~ .. 6 STATS o! cA~OU~- N W IT EXHIBIT '8' PR0.IECT NAME: TRACT 13304 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 59 d/u N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 59 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps LG be Annexed District No. 58011L 95IIRf~~I6J~-2~~T,3II6 1 --- 12 4 --- --- 4 32 2 --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D15TRICT District No. Street Name Tei ~ d iiii.u iiiw~ Mountain Y1ew Drive Turf Ground Cover Trees . ft. 50. ft. Ea. IYVJ IYVJ GV 2848 2848 48 JAA:S/17/89 // 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: Nayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Duller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner c~%c.`ntokc .~ v ~' , < ~>_ ;', ~ Z s le; ; SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TD DESIGNATE THE NIPPARD RANCH, 13181 VICTORIA STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS A LANDMARK - APN: 227-121-22 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the eslgnd-' aeon of3 acres of the Hippard Ranch, including the ranch house, as a landmark (see attached map) by the approval of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: The Nippard Ranch came to the attention of the City at the request of the owners, James and Marsha Banks. The house was built in 1916 by San Francisco Bay architect, Carr Jones. Jones is thought to have Seen a student of the great California architect, Bernard Maybeck. Mr. Jones oversaw every aspect of building, using local rock and logs of ~„n.n.~ fr,yn rho yl rawwne T• ie a rham,i n~ ll~f-fill n,A hnnca with a large living room whose most striking feature is a massive rock fireplace. Set far back from the street, the house stands fn the midst of a lemon grove. The U-shaped structure fs 1200 square feet, and is symetrical, with overhanging eaves protecting the porches. A wisteria- covered pergola crosses the front courtyard. The Hippard family owned the ranch from 1882 to 1960. They lived in the Bay area in the early part of the century, and it was in Berkeley that Alice HTppard engaged Carr Jones to build the house. Up until the time that the house was built, the family had camped on the Etfwanda property on holidays. The attached staff report explains in greater detaTi the historical comfortable, adequate space and seismically safe sleeping quarters. The addition will be located to the rear and will be attached although it is structurally independent of the existing house. The house was nearly in ruins when the Banks purchased the property in 1916; the family has taken care to restore and rehabilitate 1t respectfully. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROPOSED LANDMARK DESIGNATION - H[PPARD RANCH Mqy 17, 1989 Page 2 Designation of the house and ranch is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan which indicates very low density development in this area. The designation also helps to implement the obfectives of the Plan by promoting the preservation of open space, reinforcing the community character of Etiwanda, and preserving a structure with significant architectural merit. A neighbor questioned whether landmark status would affect installation of a sidewalk on the south side of Wctoria Street. Since the foil right-of-way has been dedicated and the Etiwanda Specific Plan calls for a sidewalk (with the windrow preserved), Landmark staWs would not affect the sidewalk. In fact, when the Banks apply for a 6uilding permits for an addition, they will be required either to Dut in improvements such as the sidewalk or more likely, make a lien agreement for the future. The Banks have received approval for a landmark Alternation Perwit (Pending approval of the landmark designation) for an addition that will permit the family coart'ortabte, adequate space and seismically safe sleeping quarters. The addition will be located to the rear and will be attached although it is structurally independent of the existing house. llr •t nn o_n ~x,nn ~._A• Thn YieM nfr Oreeo,•y of inn fn~w/¢¢Inn rnMix t< ih a• e y ounc approve the Resolution to designate the Hippard Ranch as a Landmark. R ec uiiy w i ed Br 8 er City anner BB:AB:~s Attachments: Staff report of April 6, 1989, with attachments Minutes Resolution / /~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~'`~~'y STAFF REPORT c ~' ~ ,. \ ~~ ~^. ' i" Q ~ x U DATE: Apri~ 6, 1989 is rq;. T0: Chaiwnan and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson , Senior Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DES1r,NATE THE HIPPARD RANCH, 13181 V?CTORIA' BACKGROUND: The H+ppa rd Ranch has come to our attention at the reques o its owners, James and Marsha Banks. The owners are also concurrently applying for a Landmarl•. Alteration Permit for an expansion of the house. The property is on the list of designated and potential Landmarks and Points of Historic Interest and labeled as having potential for local, state, and na tionat register status. ii. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The Hippard Ranch is in the Etiwanda comnuntty. - son the south side of Wctoria Street beMeen Etiwanda Avenue miu EaaL Avenue, eeL UaIR abuuL .iw" ieeL irum Lice street on a deep lot of nearly 10 acres. There is a garage/barn 50 feet southeast of the house. The Droposal is to designate the northerly 5 acres of APN: 227-121-22. Site Land Use, Zoning and General Plan Designations: The st e s e oca on o a s ng a am y residence, garage/barn, and citrus trees. The lot is in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. it is divided by a district development line; the northern half, where the house is located, is designated VL, Very Low Residential, 1-2 dwelling units Der acre in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and in the General Plan. The southern half is designated L, Law Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre. The house fs not among the "notable structures" listed in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, presumably because at the time the p?an was written tt was not known to staff because it cannot be seen from the street. Surrounding Land Uses, Zoning and General Plan Designations: North - D~orth of the site is a vacant single family residential area which in the Etiwanda Specific Ptan and the General Plan is designated VL, Very Low Residentiat, 1-2 dwelting units per acre. // 6 HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HIDPARD RANCN LD April 6, 1989 Page 2 South - To the south of the deep parcel are the Pacific Electric Railroad tracks which are the northern boundary of an area designated LM, Low-Medium Residential, 4-8 dwelling units per acre. East - East of the site is a single family residential area that is designated L, Law Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre, in the Etlwanda Specific Plan and General Plan. Nest - To the west is a vacant lot that now belongs to the Banks family. Its northerly 5 acres, the area next to the Hlppard Ranch house, is designated W., Very Low Residential, 1-2 dwelling units per acre; the southerly portion is designated L, Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre. This property provides a buffer between the house and the Etiwanda Intermediate School. Oescrl lion: The northern 5 acres of the parcel in which the ousiF~e s~ocated is surrounded by a chain-link fence; a wrought Tron gate guards the street entry. A professionally designed wooden sign Standing a few feet from the ground announces "Hlppard Ranch" to passersby. This portion of Wctoria Street is lined with Eucalyptus trees and stilt retains the flavor of the rural community 1t once was. n iu~iy, Sti ui yiit ui tYcwu~ `uviuci2 u' uy ici~i, ci icudi the front of the house from W ctorta Street. The house appears to hover Just above the ground. A crosshipped roof extends over the porches. The house's focal point, as it appears from the driveway, Ts a massive stone chtmmey rather than a front door. A low central gate opens to a path under a wisteria-covered pergola (wisteria planted in 1916) which Joins the two arms of the U,and travels around both sides of the rectangular front pond leading to French doors that flank the chimney. The house 1s symaetrical. it 1s categorized as Craftsmen in style because of the use of natural materials, deep roof overhangs, and use of posts on top of law rock piers; it does not have features such as gabled roofs, ribbon windows, shingles or horizontal wood stdtng, and an assymetrtcat plan that are typical of Craftsmen buildings. This is the description written by the owners: "The house is built to the shape of a "U" facing north, set 300 feet back from Wctoria. It was designed and built in the craftsman style to be energy self- sufficient. It is built entirely of native materials, /~~ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HIPPARD RANCH LD April 6, 1989 Page 3 rocks gathered from the washes east and west of Etiwanda, and cypress logs cut from the original windbreaks. The center of the "U" is a courtyard occupied by an 8' x 10' foot concrete pond which served Mo purposes: 1) a cooling factor patterned after the Egyptian style of architecture, 2) a method of gathering water (beneath the pond is a 5,000 gallon water cistern). The "arms" of the "U"are joined by a log pergola covered with the wisteria vine planted in 1916. The 1400 square foot structure has 8 entrances and numerous windows all designed to be opened when the afternoon breeze comes up at 4 p.m. The hot air escapes the house through Lhe ceiling vents built into cupolas. The house is heated 6y 3 fireplaces. The one in Ue living room also built of native stone with a 5' opening is unique due to its curvature. The interior rooms are all "open beam" (log), the ceiling is redwood, the flooring Douglas fir. Beneath the house fs a small basement where porn ons of the original solar hearing system are still Intact (holding tanks, pipes, gauged . The basement has keen iT y yu grapes for homemade wine min this basement during Prohibition). There has been no alteration to the exterior of the building. The pergola collapsed in 1981 and has been rebu7lt (cypress logs were impossible to duplicate). The kitchen interior has been remodeled. The original garage has been converted to a dining room." III. ANALYSIS: A. Historical Background: The house was designed and built in TtlIb~y aS-n Francisco Bay Area architect Carr Jones for the Hippard family. The significance of the architect is discussed to Section II1.B. The information for this report comes from the Banks who have spoken at length to 8111 Hippard about the history of the house and family, from Mara Jones (no relation), who is working on a Master's Degree in Art Research at John F. Kennedy University in San Francisco and has been investigating Jones's work and contribution to arc httecture, and, where noted, from pu611cations. !1 HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HIPPARO RANCH LO Aprii 6, 1989 Page 4 The land was purchased in 1882 from the Chaffey brothers for Samuel M. Hippard, a minister from Hesterviile, Ohio, by his congregation, but he did not live to see it. It was inherited by his two sons, Charles N. and George R. Hippard. George ended up with the property. He moved to the San Francisco Bay area and worked as a newspaper editor. He and his wife, Alice, and their Mo sons came down to Etiwanda far vacations and camped on the land. Alice loved the property. According the the Banks, it was in the Bay area that Alice Hippard met and contracted with Carr Jones to build the house in Etiwanda. The house was built in the midst of a vineyard in a 3-month period during which Jones camped on the land and supervised every aspect of the construction. The Hippard's son, Charles N. ,called Bill, was 16 at the time the house was built and helped with the construction. Once the house was built, A11ce iived in it all year round with her sons rather than move to Seattle where Mr. Hippard had taken a Job. In the 1930's, Mrs. Hippard served as Etiwanda's school librarian. The front, west bedroom was rented to the local elementary school teacher. The house was the scene of many parties and lively gatherings over the years. tt remained 1n the Hippard family untii 1960 and was rented to various tenants until it was purchased by the Banks in 1976. B. Significance: The house is significant because of Tts age, appearance, architectural and technological features, its setting within a citrus grove, and because it was built by the distinguished architect, Carr Jones. Jones is said to have studied with Bernard Maybeck, one of California's most renowned architects. It is also of significance because it is Carr Jones's only building constructed outside the San Francisco and Monterey Bay areas, and it is one of two buildings he built of rock. Jones was a student in Electrical Engineering at the Unlversety of California at the time that Maybeck was working and teaching in Berkeley. M essay about Bernard Maybeck (1862-1957) Tn Esther McCoy's classic Five California Architects describes Maybeck as a "Joyous and n epen en sp r w o, "went to the past to be refreshed, as he dipped into the industrial world of the twentieth century, bringing together disparate elements in a timeless world of his own creation." He designed several buildings for the University of California at Berkeley, many houses in the Berkeley hills and San Francesco, and 1s most famous for the Christian Science Church 1n Berkeley and the Palace of Fine Arts and Lagoon Tn San Francesco. /I HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HIPPARD RAMCN LD Apr11 6, 1989 Page 5 The influence of Maybeck on Carr Jones in the Hippard Ranch is seen perhaps in the way that Jones, too, was "bringing together disparate elements" by combining rustic, homey, natural elements with modern technological devices for water heating and irrigating. Maybeck's 1910 Randolph School was designed so that each classroom opened on three sides to the garden. Likewise, the U-shaped plan of the Hippard Ranch house and the large number of doors and windows bring the courtyard and outdoors to the inside. Bringing ii~ht to the interior was a special concern of Naybeck's; Jones s Hippard Ranch house is filled with light, unlike many Craftsman houses which tend to be dark. Both Jones and Maybeck had a love of European history and architecture. The main fireplace in the large Hippard iiving room, although rustic and made of rock, has a large rounded overhang which recalls the size and shape of Medieval and Renaissance fireplaces. In a telephone interview on March 23, 1989, Mara Jones explained that her ttudles have led her to conclude that Carr Jones was his own man and important in his own right. She said that he built only about 30 structures in his lifetime, most of them of concrete or brick. He was an ingenious problem-solver and very committed to his work. He was graduated from the University 1n the year of theq~eat ,.. eSi ti~yudee, iiw, diiu iiu iii i iiy' ii niivwi~ ui ii inn uiit~ i uw, although it is thought that he moved from place to place, camping 1n the woods, and may have worked as a logger near Yosemite. The Hippard Ranch house was important in Carr Jones' development. it was his second work, one of two houses built to 1916; nothing is known of his work again until 1921. It is the most rustic of his houses. He was challenged by the idea of using natural materials from the local environment. The Banks report that Jones designed and built furniture for the entire house, unfortunately used for firewood 1n the years when the house was rented out. His love of European history led him later to design several "Hansel and Gretel" style houses. A hint of this may be detected in the quaint charm of the peeled cypress logs that support the roof overhangs and pergola and embellish the interior as visible beams and rafters. Ms. Jones said that Carr Jones always had full control of every project he did, from start to finish, supervising and directly working on the construction, fashioning the irornvork, hiringg exactly the landscape architect who could do precisely what he had in mind. Sao HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HIPPARD RANCH LD April 6, 1989 Page fi D. Environmental Assessment: Landmark designations are exempt rom un er r c eZ9, Sec. 15308, tV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Hippard Ranch meets the criteria for es gna on n lion 2.24.090 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, and way of life. 2. The proposed landmmrk was connected with a local personality. 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. 4, The architect was important. 8. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The construction materials and engineering methods uicu iii uie pi vV~Seu iuiiu`xuiw dP0 ui,Usudi. 2. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, and its details and materials are beautiful and unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. V. CORRESPOIAENCE: This item has been advertl5ed 1n The Daily Report newspaper, owners within 300 feet have been notified and s'taif-~ visited the property and discussed the designation with the owners. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation omm sC-`i lion recommend to the City Council approval of the designation of the Hippard 'ranch as shown on Exhibit "A", 13181 W ctorta Street, as a Landmark because it meets the criteria of the H15toric Dreservatton Ordinance and is a Significant contribution to the community. l~~ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: HIPPARD RANCH LO April 6, 1989 Page 7 Respectfully submitted, ~~. l~.~~ C Rr~~ Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:ko Attachments: Site Location Map Photographs Resolutions VICTORIA STREET ~~w~uwc ® OE91d1AT10M &TE O O ~ N H M ®q ®M ® iiii~ WR -------- ® 1 s .~ . --°A!.-~~- ~~ NORTH CITY OF l~ iTEII: HIPPARD RANCH ,ANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: LANDMARK DESIGNATION FNstIOrlC PI~1~fV>tI1011 COIINIII~~1011 E~j{i~~{a~~7V AY~i • ^ISTCRiC PR ESEP,'i i~TiO;! r]r?".M ISS ICtt Li~:ipMdr'.A SUR: c'1 I Address: , ^' i"/ -^~~?.` S} APt ~~ ~'- /Z/'l3- IIISTOR IC PRESEP,'JATI71 COMMISS IOM LAt7DMARK SURVEY Address:~3/~~ VIGfD/1<i ~t. ARI 2L7 ~ 1 ~ -~~ i /, ' ~l:_ r^,~~ 1 _. i~~ - ~` I r ~ ... ~ . ~ GK{2f~t'/ re'J/ rti e'c,,. ,r ;itv ~+~~ (.ti Vlew Looking Date of Pho [o 'k ~d i~~r", ""+ti a+~+""!">~ ~~ I"9,i. • II ''view Lcokinq ,ato o` Pho [o ~ `` a J I,d l ,r ..,.. G B. LANDMARK DESIGNATION 89-02 - THE HIPPARB RANCH - A proposal to designate e pear ant c r a ree as a Landmark - APN: 227-121- 22. Commissioner Banks excused herself, as this item and Itew Care related to her property. Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Hearing no response, Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. There were not any questions from the Commission. Motion: hbved by Arner, seconded by Haskvitz to recommend to the City Council approval of Landmark Designation 69-02 - The Hippard Ranch. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ~. •:+~+ ARNER, HASK VITZ, COOPER, SCHMIDT, BILLINGS NONE NONE BANS --carried C. LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 89-OZ - THE HIPPARD RANCH - A request for a an r ra on re or a pear ant 1 victoria Street, Rancho Cucamonga - APN: 227-121-22. Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Arner questioned wily the recamaendatian to use square togs instead of round logs. She stated they would be able to tell the difference beMeen the old structure and the new structure. She stated that she felt it was not necessary. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Mr. Jtm Banks, owner of Hippard Ranch, questioned who will be the person determining changes are maJor or not mayor. He stated he would like to have the authority vested in one person. HPC MINUTES -3- APRIL 6, 1989 gas RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMAISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE NIPPARO RANCH LOCATED AT 13181 VICTORIA STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AS A LANDMAltl( NHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all caaments on the proposed Landmark Designation. NHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation. NHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resoiutfon have occurred. NOM, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The application applies to the northerly 5 acres of the property oca e a Assessor Parcel Number 227-121-22. SECTION II: The proposed landmark meets the following criteria establishe n ap er 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucampnga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural STgnificance: 1 Thn ~ eaA lanA~ne nY ie nnMlnrl only ronrocanfaflun of an~historical period, type, style, region, and way of life. 2. The proposed landmark was connected with a local personality, 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but Ts now rare. 4. The architect was important. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: t. The construction materials and engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual. /a~ NPt RESOLUTION RE: NIPPARD RANCH LD April 6, 1989 Page 2 2. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, and its details and materials are beautiful and unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Sect on SECTION IY: Based on the substantial evidence recetved and reviewed by this oma ss on and based on the findings set forth above, NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Conmission does hereby recommend approval of designation of The Nippard Ranch as a landmark. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, HASKVITZ, COOPER, SCHMIDT, BILLINGS NOES: COhMiSST ONCpc• uO,yE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COFVdISSIONERS: BANKS ~a ~ RESOLlTION N0. $q- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIfORNI A, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE HIPPARD RANCH LOCATED AT 13181 VICTORIA SiREET AS A LANDMARK NHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised pubttc hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark Designation and Issued Resolution No. 89-02 recanmending to this City Council that said Landnmrk Designation be apprave~' NHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all Input from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said Landmktrk Designation. NHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NON, TNEREFORE,~the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as 4olrows: SECTION I: The application applies to the northerly 5 acres of the property oca e a Assessor Parcel Number 227-121-22. SECTION Ii: The proposed landmark meets the following criteria establishe~ln t'~apter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is Darticularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, and way of life. 2. The proposed landmark was connected with a local personality. 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. 4. The architect was important. D. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The construction materials and engineering methods used in the Droposed tandmark are unusual. f d0 CITY CDUNCIL RESDLUTIDN N0. RE: THE HIPPARD RANCH LD Page 2 2. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, and its details and materials are beautiful and unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Sect on SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this ou-C nciT and based on the findings set forth above, NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESDLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve designation of The Hippard Ranch as a landmark. /a5 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE HIPPARD RANCH, 13181 VICTORIA STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS A LANDMARK - APN: 227-121-22 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Ctty Council approve the es gn~atl'on of3 acres of the Hippard Ranch, including the ranch house, as a landmark (see attached mapl, by the approval of the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND: The Hippard Ranch came to the attention of the City at the request ot^the owners, James and Marsha Banks. The house was built in 1916 by San Francisco Bay architect, Carr Jones. Jones is thought to have been a student of the great California architect, Bernard Maybeck. Mr, annae nvnreay oynry aenxt of 4Utldl na, U51ng local rock and 1095 of cypress from the windrows. It is a charming, light-filled house with a ft re lace. Set far back from the street, the house stands in the midst of~aP temon^grove~ The-U-shaped structure is'1200 square feet ve ~H and is symmetrical, with overhanging eaves protecting the porches. A wisteria- covered pergoia crosses the front courtyard. The Hippard family owned the ranch from 1882 to 1960. They lived in the gay area in the early part of the century, and Tt was in Berkeley that Alice Hippard engaged Carr Jones to build the house. Up until the time that the house was built, the family had camped on the Ettwanda property on holidays. The attached staff report explains in greater detail the historical and arch tectural background of the house. The house was nearly in ruins when the Banks purchased the property in 1976; the family has taken care to restore and rehabilitate it respectfully. Designation of the house and ranch is consistent with the Etlwanda Specific Pian which indicates very low density development 1n this area. The designation aiso helps to implement the ob~ectlves of the Plan by promoting the preservation of open space, reinforcing the community character of Etlwanda, and preserving a structure with significant architectural merit. /d CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROPOSED LANDMARK DESI6NAT10N - HIPPARD RANCH Mqy 17, 1989 Page 2 A neighbor questioned whether landmark status would affect installation of a sidewalk on the south side of victoria Street. Since the full right-of-way has been dedicated and the Etiwanda Specific Plan calls for a sidewalk (with the windrow preservedl, Landmark status would not affect the sidewalk. In fact, when the Banks apply for a building permit for an addition, they will be required either to put in improvements such as the sidewalk or more likely, make a lien agreement for the future. The Bardcs have received approval for a Landmark Alternation Pemait (pending approval of the landmark designation) for an addition that will perniit the family comfortable, adequate space and seismically safe sleeping quarters. The addition will be located to the rear and will be attached although it is structurally independent of the existing house. Action Requested: The Historic Preservation Commission requests that e y ounc approve the Resolution to designate the Hippard Ranch as a Landmark. Attachments: Staff report of April 6, 1969, with attachments Minutes Resolution / ~/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPptT PROPOSED LANDMARK DESIGNATION - HIPPARO RANCN MAy 17, 1989 Page 2 Designation of the house and ranch is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan which indicates very low density development in this area. The designation also helps Lo impiement the objectives of the Plan by promoting the preservation of open space, reinforcing the camaunity character of Etiwanda, and preserving a structure with significant architectural merit. A neighbor questioned whether landmark status wou1E affect installation of a sidewalk on the south side of Wctoria Street. Since the full right-of-way has been dedicated and the Etiwanda Specific Plan calls for a sidewalk (with the windrow preserved), Landmark status would not affect the sidewalk. In fact, when the Banks apply for a building permits for an addition, they w171 be required either to put Tn improvements such as the sidewalk or more likely, make a lien agreement for the future. The Banks have received approval for a Landmark Alternation Permit (Pending approval of the landmark designation) for an addition that will perndt the family comfortable, adequate space and setsm/cally safe sleeping quarters. The addition w111 be located to the rear and will be attached although it is structurally independent of the existing house. -a - n-..--a.d. Two u(~t~rf~ Dra~~.v MTnw r,M..t eai nn wonllot}t fhrh ~e•y y~ ounca approve tAe Resolution to designate the Htppard Ranch as a Landmark. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TNIS 17TH DAY OF NIIY 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA BY: arty e a rman ATTEST: ra er, re ary / 32- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROPOSED LANDMiitlf DESIGNATION - NIPPARD RANCH Mqy 17 ,1989 Page 3 I, Brad Dulier, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 17th day of MAy 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Attachments: Staff report of April 6, 1989, with attachments Minutes Resolution /~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OP PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 21, 1989 TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AND APPROVE THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PARR AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolutions giving preliminary approval of the City Engineer's Reports and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District for Fiscal Year 1989/90 and offering a time and place for a Public Haaring. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the requirements of the Landscapinc and Lighting Tn4 of l_O l7 nl! Pnn<..n nr n O..~n~~ ...,_ _ _ tr___ _ry ..~_..__- _t-_.. _.._ _.. - Recreation Improvement District PD-BS has been prepared, A review of current year's activities is included as well as projected expenditures for Fiscal Year 1989/90. The assessment Eor Fiscal Year 1989/90 is proposed to remain at $33.50 per dwelling unit. The assessment will provide sufficient funds to cover debt service. R spectEUlly submitted, ~~a-~.~ Jerry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF:jf Attachments /~ RE190111fIDNNO. g7- ~ 5 A RESOLUTION OF TFtE CITY CCUNgI qF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA, CAIJFOWJI/~ OF PRELQNNARY APPROVALOF CRY BrQINEER'S AMJl1AL REPORT FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMEPIT DISTRICT (PD-B6~ RESOLVED hY the Gy CatrrtcN d the City d Rancho Cucemaga that: WHEREAS, pursuant b the Landscape acrd Ligfrtlrrp Ad of 7972, the Chy Ertglneer is required to make and flM whh the Ctiy Clerk of the City an annual report In writkq br which assessments are ro be levbd end collected ro pay Me coats of the maintenance anNor improvement of said Park and Recreation ImprwemeM District (PD-85). WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and Wed wNh tire City Clerk d said Chy a report in writing u called fcr under and pureuam b said Ad, which has been presented b Mis Coundl for consideretlon; and WHEREAS, Bald CouncA has duly aonaiderad said report and each and every paA thereof, and finds that each and every prat d sent repel b auffltdent std that said report, nor arry pert thereof, requires or sfrouM ba modfled ro arty respect. NOW, THEREFORE, q k ordered ffi idlows: t . That the Engineer's esdmero d INrMzed mats and expenses of sent wak and d the kttNdental expenses Mt connedbn therewith. contained in said report be, and each of them era hereby preNminerity tpprovad and aomfkmed. 2. That the ttieprams showkq MB Aaeeasmant Oishkss referred b and da~xibed in 9a!d rem^., a :,awaerras vt the suawrenna or rare wnrnn seio wsseasmem DlstrkKS are Hereby prelkninarNy approved end conikmed. 3. Thal tiro proposed asaesantent8 upon the strbdMebrra d lend kt said Assessment Districts in proportbn to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdvisbn, reapectWety, hom said work end of the krCld6Mal expenses thereof, as txmtelned in sakt report is her prelkninarNy approved and oonflrmed. 4. That saki report shall srord as the Cfry Errgkwer's Annual Report for Me flacal year 1999/90 br the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. / ~V CtIVCOI~Rts^SOLUipN Parks 6 Repeatbn DbMct PD-85 12 May 17, 1989 Page 2 1988/86 7 996/97 1 987/88 1 988/89 ] .8.8.9[.8.4 Per Residentlel S 34.65 S 33.50 S 33.50 S 33.50 S 33.50 Vacant Land 1.5 acres or less 17.32 16.75 16.75 16.75 16.75 Vacant Land 1.51 b 3.5 apes 51.99 5025 5025 50.25 50.25 Vacant Lend 3.51 b 7.0 apes 121.19 1S72b 117.25 11725 11725 VacanlLand 7.01 b 14.00 acres 2A259 23450 234.50 294.50 234.50 Vacant Lard 14.01 tJ 2~ 0 sues 465 ~5 484 M 469.00 489.00 489.00 Vawiri iau~i ia.ui +wrna and larger 866.42 83750 83750 837.50 837.50 !3 ~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PARR AND RECREATION IIVIPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-SS) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUD3E, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report 85-PD Fiscal Year 1989/90 Authority For Report This repcrt for the 1989/90 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways Code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set fo[th findings and the assessment analysis Eor the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. BS-PD, thereafter referred to as 'the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cast of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Pind inns Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be ap- portioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 IDiv ision 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Californial. The 1912 Act also provides Eor the classification of various areas within an assessment 3!strict !ntc benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, Location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive during differing degrees aE 6enef it from the improvements. Benefiting areas consist of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of beneE it, they are considered a user's Eee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XZIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right of-way, common areas, and non-profit organizations li.e., churches, clubs) are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. District Analysis A. Improvement District Boundary The Lmprovement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria 6 Terra Vista Planned Carman ities. Ail parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared !n accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, vh ich are on Ella in the off lce of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park Improvement District No. 85-PD. C. Facilities Ton .,i n~in ~Ln of n1 a11. An ~i weA ..._ =. .^~ F10_.._ .mp.n..n,nn ,.n nnn n. , _ ac fO110WS: The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, on- site roads, sidewalks, parking lots, Lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging ana equestrian trails. The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, on- site roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted Ath ietic, far.iliti es, jogging trait, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. Estimate of Cost The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal year. Costs Eor the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessments or any deficits shall be Included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. 1989-1990 Fiscal Year Estimated Costs b Budget Sunmary Balance from 1988-89 Budget $ 47,887 Contributions linterest earned) Redemption Fund/Limited $ 32,552 to Pay Bond Debt Service Special Reserve Pund/Limited $ 16,965 to Pay Bond Debt Service Total Estimated Available Funds $ 97,404 County Special Charges $ 5,483 Administration Charges $ 87,728 Consultant's Fees $ -0- Piscal Agent Charges $ 1,243 Debt Service Installment 11/2/901 $303,733 Debt Service Installment 17/2/901 $503,733 Operation 6 Maintenance $190,871 Yulu,l,.a ~.~ ,iseeaallic,~~. $1,092,791 4iy., , .,ur Method of Spread The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1971 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categar ies for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: Category A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. Category B - includes all parcels not defined in Category A ar Category C. Category C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt khat show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, far example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is basee on actual land use infozmatibn contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions: Number of Existing Res. Parcel Size Ranoe Dwellinw Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 acres and 1 or morn dwelling units 1.51 to 3.5 acres and 2 or more dwelling units 3.51 to 7.0 acres and 1 or more dwelling units 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 8 or more dwelling units 11.01 to 15.0 acres end 15 or more dwelling units 25.01 acre & larger and 26 or more dwelling units Ce Lcyoay n is Luau a liw uwiwca ~i cnia Liuy awiucu lini uui La. Tire actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in assessments due to new development, Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A ar Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. all prcperties currently tax exempt; 1. all public ownerships; 3. railroad mainline rights-of-way; 4. major utility transmission rights-of-way; 5. mineral rights; 6. parcels so small they currently cannot be builk upon; 7. all normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $S00 and 1.5 acres or less; and 8. non-profit organizations (L.e., churchesl. C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1989/90 is $33.50 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than an residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $33.50 timas the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment which may be levied Ear parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1989/90 shall be according to the following schedule: Definition less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7,0 acres 7.01 acres to 11.0 acres 11.01 acres to 25.0 acres 25.01 acres and larger Assessment Per Parcel $ 16.75 $ 50.25 $117.25 $234.50 $469.00 $837.50 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.0 Eor Category C parcels. .. ~ ...... ,.~ r,..... nave been tahulated and are on file with the Clty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and are hereby made a part hereof 'ry t.,.e reference. Assessments Single Pami ly units 26,117 at 33 .50 = 874,919.50 Less than 1.50 acres B71 at 10 .75 = 14,639.50 1.5 acres to 3.50 acres 348 at 50 .25 = 17,487,00 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 231 at 117. 25 = 27,094.75 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres 142 at 234. 50 = 33,299.00 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 52 at 169. 00 21,388.00 25.01 acres and larger 29 at 837. 50 = 21,287.50 1,016,104.00 R601.11fIONND. g7- ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CfTV COUNCIL CF THE CRY OF RANCHO CIN;AMONGA, CAUf.ORhNA, DECUIRNJG RS MREN110N TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PQ95) AND SETTING ATII~APD PLACE FOR Pl1BLIC FEAfING THEREON WHEREAS, the City CounW of the City of Ranch Ctaamorga, CalNomia, has prevbusy formed a special assessment dfabiG pursuant b the terms of the 'Latdacaping and LlghWq AIX of 1972", beirtp Diviabn 15, PaA 2 of the Streets and Hgnways Code of the Stab of CaNbmia, in what b known and designated as 'PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (HERBAGE AND fiED HILL COAMdUdfTV PARKS. WHEREAS, at thls finre dre City ColaaNl k daekoue b take proceedrgs b provide br the annual kivy of asseasmenls for the next anauirq fiscal year b provkle fa Me costs and expenses necessary to pay debt service on the bonds Issued and costs to annual maNttenance br the Assessment Distrbt; and WHEREAS, at this lkne Mere has been presenbtl end approved by this Cary Coundl, the Engineer's Report, es requked by law, end Mfs City Courrdl k deakous of continukq wNh Me proceedings br sea annual levy. Now, TFiEF~FORE. fT x HEREBY R680LVED AS PoLLOWS: SECTION 1; That the above red1818 ere aN true anld correct. That the puWb interest and convenience requires, and it is the Intention of Mis legislative body, to undertake proceedkg6 br the annual levy and colledbn of assessments br Me payment of costs end expenses for the blktwing desgnated Nnprovemenro, including debt service on bads Issued b assist in finandrg said improvements: Conslructbn of peck and reaeatlonal improvements in Hentage and Red HNI Communiry Parks, including but rat limited to, land preperetbn, including grading, landscaping and irrigation systems, together wkh appurtenant work, That no new improvements or any substantial changes in existing Improvements are proposed ~ e paA of these proceedings. l~~ crrv coLa+aL R~oLUrIDN Park a Recreatlon District PD-eti xt May 17, 1999 Papa 2 SECTION 3: That EaW works of improvement ere of diced benefit to the properties within the boundaries of seW Asseasmem District, which Asaessmem Distrct the lepisletlve body prevbusly declared to be the area benefited by saW works of Imprwemen4 and for partbulars reference is made b the boundary map as prevbusty approved by tlds IephletNe bony, a ~ a whbh fa on tae b the Orrice a the Coy cledt and open kx pubpc kn<pectbn, and designated by the name a thls A85easmem District. ; That the 'Reports of the Enpkteer, as preliminarity approved by this kpislatlve body, is on tae wah the Coy Cknk and open for pubac bapedfon. Reterertce is made to said "Reports br a hrtl and daWl•d descdptlon a the e><btlnp works of kryxovement, the boundaries a the Assassmonl Dbtrbl arW any woes lhereNr, and the preposed aaeessnrems upon essessaDle kNe and parcels of lend wthin dre Asseasmem Dkdrict. $~,y: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 1999, AT THE HOUR OF 7~0 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE tr1EETNJG PLACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL AT LIONS PARK COkIMl1Nf1Y CENTER, 9161 EASE IJNE HON), F1AtIt:HD t:lll:ASKJHCin, 1:A4!SIHNIA. IS THE TIME AND PLACE Flxeo B'v THLS LEGISLATIVE BODY FOR HEARING PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN REFERENCE TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS AND TO ANY OTHER MATTERS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION. ANY PERSONS WHO WISH TOOBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS OR THE ANNUAL LEVY SflfxllD FlLE A WRITTEN PROTEST WRH THE CITY CLERIC PRIOR TOTHE TartE SET FOR 111E PUBLIC HEARING. SECTON s: That the City Clerk {s hereby auttariwd and dratted to pNe notice u causing a Dopy of this ReaolWion to DB published b The 081p1 pemrL a newspaper a general circuletbn whMn the Ciry; said pubikstion to ba completed not less men (1g) day prbr b the date set for the publk: hearing. ~~/ CITY CODICIL RESaLUnanl Park 8 Recraatbn Disirkt PD-86 i1 May 17, 1989 Pape 3 SECTION 7: For any end all inbrmatbn rela8np to Mere proceedings, includhq IMormatbn reletkq to protest procedure, your atlentbn is dkeded to the person designated bebw: Je~y 8. Fulwood t)epub City Manager P.O. Boz 807 Rancho Curanorge, CA 91730 Telephone: (71 d) 989.1851 l ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jerry 8. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 21, 1989 TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS POR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICP NOS. i, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolutions giving preliminary approval of City Engineer's Reports, declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for Fiscal Year 1989/90 and oEFering a time and place for a Public Hearing. ANALYSIS/BACISGROUND: A preliminary Engineer's Report reviewing the current years activities, expenditures to date and projected expenditures Ii,.. ,moo^'_ w~g~ ad fnr ea rh Rtroet Lightingy~Maintenance District. ~Thisr report is required pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Each district's assessment rate for previous years and as proposed Eor Fiscal Year 1989/90 is outlined on the attached Exhibit. R al/l(//y~J submitted, 'rvV~ N ~ ,L erry B. FulWOOd Deputy City Manager JBF:BC:de Attachments CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SI.lID 1-6 May 17, 1989 Page 2 Lighting District Y1 (Arterial) Lighting District >f2 (Local) Lighting District f13 I Victoria) Lighting District M4 (Terra Vista) Lighting District NS ICarynl Lighting District >16 I Colmnercial/Industrial) EXFIZBIT 85/86 86/87 87/88 88 89 89 90 8.91 7.52 7.52 7.52 7.52 36.22 31.23 32.23 23.00. 20.00 48.65 48.03 35.00 27.00 20.00 27.14 32.21 25.00 22.00 20.00 -0- -0- 38.50 35.00 20.00 -0- -0- -0- 25.00 20.00 /y ~ RE90LUfI0H NO. $q" a}7 A RESOLUf10N OF TFiE CITY COUNGL CF THE CfTY CF RANCHO Cl1CAMONGA, CAl1RDF01N, OF PRELataJARY APPROVAL OF CRY ENG7NEEA5 ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGFRaJC MAMITENANCE DISTRICT NOS.1, 2, 3, ~, 5, AND 6 RESOLVED by Ma City Counca d the City of Randb Cucernaga Mat: WHEREAS, purauaM b the l.erMecape and Liphtinp Act of 1972, the Chy Enpinear is required b mdse and fae wah the Chy Cbrk of the City an annual report in wMing for whbh assessments are b be levied and odlected b pay Me costs of the maintenance andor improvement of said Street Uphitrq Maintenance Dbtrid Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 WHEREAS, Me City Ergkreer has made and algid wah the City Clerk d SaW City a report in writlng u taped br under and pureueM b saki Act, whkth has DBen preserved b Mis Coundl for conaideretbn; and WHEREAS, said CourtcA taus duty oonatdered said report gird each and every pert tftereof, and fords Mat each and every pert d said report la sulfldBM, and Mat said report, nor any part thereof, requires or Should ba modllled b any reaped. NOW, THEREFORE, a k ordered es tolbws: t . Tad Me Erpineera estlmate of Itemized costs and experraes of sold work and of Me Incldenut exparares in rwnneotbn dtarawiM, coMeMed in said report 6e, and each of Mem are hereby preliminarty approved end confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Distrbts referred to and destxibed M said report, the boundadas of the subdivisbns of land wiMln said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved end confirmed. 3. That Me proposed asaeasmenta upon the sutMWisbns d land in sub Assessment Districts in propodbn to the estimated benefit b be receNed by said subdNfabn, respectivety, from said work and of Me Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in saW report Is hereby preliminarity approved and oonarmed. 4. That seW report shall stand es the Ciry Engineers Report for the flecal year 1989/90 for the purposes of as subsequent pralaedinga. /~ 0 CITY ca,i4ca I~ESCl11iIDN SLMD1,2,3,4,5&MB May 17, 1989 Pape 2 Liphdrp Disma 111 (Arterial) LipMinp District M2 (local) Liphdrp Dlsmd A (Victoria) Liphdnp District ar4 (Tarts Vista) uplninp Drama r5 (Caryn) LlpMinp Disirkt MB (.^.vT,Sro i in' Bii I I NYC p id l) AMd1ALASSESSIrENT W1TES 58.91 58.91 57.52 57.52 57.52 36.22 31.23 25.00 23.00 20.00 48.65 48.03 35.00 27.00 20.00 27.14 3221 25.00 25.00 20.00 -o- -a -0- -a 35.00 35.00 20.00 -0- 25.OD 20.00 /~~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (AR,mF>~nr.~ FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RU93ELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER Annual Engineers Report Street Lighting Maintenance District Na. 1 Arterial Streets Fiscal Year 1989/90 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 IArter ial Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, Stake of California )Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. This report deals with the ptojacked costs Eor fiscal year 1988/89 and the projected expenditures Eor fiscal year 1989/90 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to Eurni sh services and materials far the ordinary ana usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and casts shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities Lnclude the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1989/99 Review NB/99 As of Proi acted Hudget 3 31/89 6/30/89 Assmt Admin 48,720 48,720 48,720 Maint/Dper -0- -0- -0- Capital Expend 20,000 -0- 20,000 Electric 42,000 21,656 21,656 110,720 70,376 90,776 During Fiscal year 1988/89 the fallowing tracts and lights were annexed 'into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1: ANNEX 40 TRACE 12643 49 S,F, TFACT' 13555 47 S.F. TRACT 13556 40 S,F, TRACT 13550 52 S.F, TRACT 13560 23 S.F. TRACE 13561 43 S.F, TRACE 13563 44 S,F. DR 87-11 5 ASST. UNITS PM 9350 206 S.F. DR 87-26 62 ASST, UNITS ANNEX 41 TRACT 12870 67 S.F. DR 67-16 1 ASST. UNIT ANNEX /2 TRACT 13{25 71 S.F. ANNEX /3 DR 86-13 5 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 44 TRACT 13476 37 S.F. TRACT 12902 29 S.F. ANNEX 45 TRACT 13641 24 S.F. PM 9504 32 ASST. UNITS CUP 87-04 7.7 ASST. UNITS DR 86-32 65 ASST. UNITS ANNEX {6 TRACT 12650 35 S.P. TRACE 12650-4 36 S.P. TRACT 13715 5 S.F. TRACT 13697 17 S.F. TRACT 13742 17 S.P. ANNEX 47 TRACT 13318 16 S.F. CUP 87-19 7.74 ASST. UNITS ~II wr -tit 3.54 7..^,CT. w..... -vn o - 2.56 ASST. UNITS DR 87-52 176 ASST. UNITS PM 10941 14.58 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 21, 1988 DR 87-28 8.7 ASST. UNITS TRACE 13748 232 S.F. TRACE 13857 TRACT 13858 TRACE 13273 12B S.F. DR 87-55 16 ASST. UNITS TRACE 13270 280 S.F. CUP BS-19 6 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED a"POBER 5, 1988 CUP 87-16 16 ASST. UNITS CUP 87-26 21 ASST. UNITS TRACT 12659-1 138 S.P. ANNEXED OCTOBER 19, 1988 PM 9897 ]0 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13728 34 S.P. PM 11341 23 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 2, 1988 DR 87-59 9.7 ASST. UNITS DR 87-61 7 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 16, 1999 PM 10783 23 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13367 19 S.F. ANNEXED DECEMBER 7, 1988 PM 10238 9 ASST. UNITS TRACT 136!1 19 ASST. UNITS DR 89-18 8.5 ASST. UNITS TRACF 13512-2 30 ASST. UNITS ANNE7<ED DECEMBER 21, 1988 DA 86-27 12 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED JANUARY 4, 1 989 OR 8T-17 1.4 ASST. UNITS TRACT 17063 74 S.F. DA 87-19 DR 87-20 11 ASST. UNITS FOA HOTH TRACT 12332-2 151 S.F. MDR 88-19 19 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED JANUARY 18, 1989 DR 87-51 28.69 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13281 205 S.F. DR 88-28 8.10 ASST. UNITS TRPA!' !3280 152 S.F. RY I, 1989 PEBAUA _ TRACT 12895 8 ASST. UNITS PEHHUARY 15, 1989 PM 10981 36.56 ASST. UNITS MARCN 1, 1989 TRACT 14150 64 ASST. UNITS PM 11DJ0 143 ASST, UNITS MARCH 15, 1989 DR 87-06 21.6 ASST. UNITS CUP 88-20 i.46 ASST. UNITS DR 99-15 5 ASST. UNITS APRIL 5, 1999 TRACT 13432 56 S.P. DR 87-42 1.28 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13512-3 24 S.P. TRACP 13823 5 S.F. DA 87-14 3 ASST. UNITS TRACT 11606-I 41 S.P. Proj. Budget 84/85 85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 Assort Admin -0- 1235 4059 31,952 48,720 69,752 Overhead -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 2,751 Maint/Oiler 2885 2902 50 130 -0- -0- Electric 21,518 25,419 25,971 29,651 42,000 62,000 Cap Expend -0- -0- -0- -0- 20,000 8,000" 24,403 29,586 30,083 61,933 110,720 142,503 "Portion of carryover funds Projected Eevenue After review of current and projected expenditures it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 will remain at $7.52 per assessment unit. Ttie projected carryover funds IS 66,770) will be used to funs the district until assessments are received in January. Protected Lights Protected Assessments 229 - 5,800 17,/38 at 5 7.52 ~ $131,131 229 - 9,500 126 at 515.01 = 9 6,407 1 - 22,000 $137,541 12 - z7,soo IN CYTY OF RANG~IO CUG4MONGA Llpntlnp MBlntenMCe Aah~ct Na f uF ....................................................... east etiee ease eaao nr ~r -,uwam~m wn nnbw a,v.~a~+r err. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGMTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 AMEXATION No. 4p ~J~h~~i'~~I, • 11 ~ i ~ 17 p i N tl Q N Y ~ 1~ i tt i 7tii?1i'i i D 1t ~_~ I N H 17 1~ »i~liiiii rung ~E ~d c+rouHO wvEa S~9UND ~~ "-~ s,aso s.r<, s,po s.F. l5~ ;~%`~°?D crrY o>r a,~rrcao cucAUOxae :;;.~~. covrrr~r os sort ~Aaan~to ^ .: ~ :~ ` - ~. - ~ arsTa o>r cAln~o~ T - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTAICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢d - TURf GROUNO COVER Ty, l~ ~.~ T,03D S.F. /57 5~~~~4'~ __ = ~~ -~,- ~Q OV AR1,;~1 Nl,QEO S.f. crr~r otr aerrcao cncetioxae cotJrrrn o>r sett azexe>+tDrxo eTeTrt o' cetnrozirne }~T ,< ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 40 1 NPOW P ^ J rf. __~____ r-.e..rrr.-.wi-_____'. J ~ft - ..n iP•.. W I` . Pte. ] f fib, ii :c_ ' I-~ ~ ' ;P ~• i~ I I • Y..i Il ' ,..,,..~., T r. . ;2' - ~ . I ~ - ~ / l ~ ~ .ai I t.I Imo. w ~-f .. ~ I + ~.. 1 )~) ~= I/.. I ~ ~ ~ T1T~ i I y I~ ~~ r rl ~nJ, ' •~, t.•.i i V• `~ f ~r -~.;,~ .~~- /.5 B ~,~~. ,. ~~ CITY Ot RANCHO CVCAYONGA coc>NTY or eAN >uaNA~n~lo sTATa 01 CALII~ORNIA - N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTlIICT N0. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 4d sync .w. ~_~~ ~- - - ' ~--^ __ ~~ ~' .~ ~~ ~~ _~ ~_ ~ .M.ut ..~~~/ l ~i ~~.I I -~ I. --~, ,-i- .a.r~ -'~ i ~ ~ T ..~ /59 ,.v~~ crrY 0! RANC$0 CuCA1tONGA ~~~' ~ COUNTY OI r,AI? 8168~1A1tDII~tO .._~ ~~ STATE os cAtnro~A - N =~ -~ ~ ~. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 STREET SIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AMEXATiON NO. •Fp - TURF ® 6ROUN0 COVER T ~.~d ~Q S~€S ~.~- 4,Oi0 S.F. Z~,34S S.F. ~ ~ /~v ,~:~~ crr~r o>r asxcso cvc~->ICOxas ~.:.;,~, ;'4 covrrr~r o>t eAx assrr~nQro ~~ _ sreT~ os cAt~oaxtl, N SSESSMENT DIAGRAM MTINO MAINTENANCE DISTpICT N0, „j ANNEXATION NO. ¢p TURF GROUND COMER ~ ~~ yROUND COVER A~g~i 1,30D S.f. 41,130 S.F. /~/ ' 0117 0>I RANCHO CvCA1I0NGA s, . _, `.~-,:~ COUPI'PY OI SAN BZRNA1tDII~fO _~ `E~' ~ STATi 01 CAi.Q~ORN' •' s ~/ T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIl:TRICT NO. ,j AMEXATION NO. ¢d ~ ~ - TURF ® GROUND COVER ' s.c~~, .: ~~ = ~.~~} =.~ 0 S.F. GROUND COYER A~F 30,110 S.F. ~" ~ ~~'. C>TZ Or SANCHO CCCAILONGA covrrnr or eArr ~rlASaaro FATS or cAt,~oSNtA - ~T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANNEXATION NO. ¢0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u „ ,: u « ~s ~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ 1 A ~ s a~ a a r a » " i~•r~.iri~iAi~ ~I~I~I~I~ -TURF jy,~ ~ GROUND DOVER A~ ~c~-• GROUND COVE!! o s.F, a,zeo s.F. s°i-~ ~- :.~ :~ ` .~ /(03 cri7r o>r a-KCSO cucrucoxaa covrrt~r os eAx siaxAae,aa-o BATS a>, c~>~ N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM -~ STREET LIGFITING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION No. 4o H IGNLANO AVENUE T~.y~ wIN G G n S. r RR. al• ~1 ~ ~ ~* aJ `y ~ i. C f ~. ..,- ... _ a I..r w ay ~, ~ Z 11 _ . ~, ,+r _s aY jg` :~k y~•t '-a w r Z BASSLINt fZOAO ,~;~~~; crrY o~ RAxcao cucAUOxaA - ;'~ COUNTY OI AAN 8=8xA8DIx0 aTA'Pa OT CA1.U'01lxL- ~ /~y I ~[~t 931 N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATpN N0. ~ ~ PArlN14l FLVR np.o / ~~ J _ ~.~ly~.ff-/AMILY MAKIM UaNLi% aM/tiw ~ r ~~ ~ MtMi ~ ~/M MIpfNK WNW p~y~yY Y G 1 _ RKt LMLL ~_ ~'I~I/0~ ~ /INM /~~~ w e~rw neLo MROU MW, ~~5 r~~; crry a>• sAxcao cuc~-~coxas ` r~. ~:~ :'~\'> covrrr~r ag six aaax~lntxa f .~,~ -. a. ~-- .; ~ ~reTS of cwznronxut r T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIpNTINp MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Np,1 APYiEXAT1pN N0. 4/ srnu? i anounotov[~t~ .n.~ i rntquu t[n ~[0 7R~r4 )L100 ~ ~~ Mwl ~~ ~~~. - (]a MU - NrNfli~p / ~~ ~~Pj~4 cr17r or iuxcao cucarcoxoa ~:_~; cotrrrr~r or Barr sasx,~n~o /~ :_ '~' ~ sraTa or cata~c / ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 , W W t W 7 S 7 f ~~ Q 1 l ~ /~ ~ .~"~'''1°w crrn o~ a~xcgo cucticoxcs w ~~ ;,~;~~ covx~r or eax ~xw>~alo ANNEXATION NO. 42 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE 61,41NTENANCE DISTIIICT N0.1 ANNEXATION N0. 43 aen Mrr - _, =_ ~ ` _ ~, _' l L~ ~~ ~I I -= M~ ~~ V ~~~ ~ m ~; I II'll -i-,~-I I~hI _ ~~ N '~ I 1 i l~ S ~~'%~'~~' CITY OF R.1NCH0 Cl,'CA,~Iq~-~'q r',-~; ; ;~~~ ~~ >:- ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION -~~ VICINITY ,~tAP N „SSESSMENT DIAGRAM STAEET LIGiiTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. 2 8 ~ ~' 1~9 s%~D~ . crr~r o~ a~xcso cvcs~oxo~ ~,. courr~r of six as~sann~o ~; ` sr~~ of cAia~osutA ~,~~ N AS.,ESSMENT DIAGRA„A STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION NO. Z B ~~~ n f ~_~ ` RYUNOM ~= pfllC[l _ _' 1 _. r~r"'~'~" -~ -~~" n ~ -' {--~ ~ :. ~ I I ~ ~_ I ~ •~'I~m as ~ ~ ~ i ~ b i. ~ {7.~-"r' L / 10 I N ~1~/ i.. ..~. ,... •~ wn ~~ ~y It ~ / I~ 17 i ~ 11 ~ ~ I. 1 f IO II ._ ~r.r :elw I • I 5 i i ~ ) . I - ' 1_~ ~ " I ,-'r"'~, L1~ j ~ ' '~ -I'--- ~ .± ', ~:~~ r'~ T' win m. ~'_ 1 5 zi ~ '1 W~~ ~' r.,..~i i 1''~ ~.~:`;: crrY o>r aaxcao avcticoxas ~~ covx~r o>i sax snx~ena~o n ~~TS o>, ~~~ _ N ~: ~ ., ; AS8E88MENT,~ ,D.IAQwAM STREET ~IOMTINO MAtNTNry/~NCNi , ast~ ' N0.1 ' ~~ ANNEXATION NQ-. ¢S' :~ Njp~ltilpry :F, c. '~"~v--- s7-oo ~ I w ?-. ; ~7~ CPP! 0~ ~0 COlJir'1'Y 0! SAN ~AEDQfOA a'PA'PS 0~ CALQ~OElQA 1T l 't s. ;' ~• '~..` i S• ~~r ~. PRZ ~. ASSESSMENT 'DIAGRAM .,.:._ TREtT LIQNTINO MAINTENANCt Dls'{'IIICT NO.~, ANNEXATION NQ 43 ~~ ~ 7 •~~~ti C1TT Ot ~AI~IC$O ClICAy011pA : . ~; \~ OOUM'Y 0~ tAl/ ~11IIADII/0 `:_ , T 1. AS8ESSMENt::p1AQpAM~• • ~ j STREET LIGNTINO MAINT~NKMCE •OIST~IICT Np,t AMEXATION NQ 95 • _.,, ~a~.rr~ --- - •s ~ ~ -r ' 1. ~C ~Qt. tC n ~ .r ~ --- ~yltr ior• ~ ~~L S 1 ~~ i • r •; sy'°~~~~'`%~ C1Tt OI LWC80 CtICAl~pl10A ;+~~\= OOUIr'1'Y OI ,AN D,QKAED~fO ~ s al'A17 0~ CAL~p1lNl~ '~""-~ ,T ASSESSMENT DIAQRAM ,- STREET I.IONTINO MAINTtNANCE OIiTlIICT NO.Z '~~". ANNEXATION N0. ~/5 VALlNCI~~ W ' .7 i W t TtRRA VISTA VILLAQE ~ . RM. li04: r ~ %~' <L ~ J : . iAaE ~ wits ao~ ;: j '~ •. cArArfif~o~~ A~~~fa c~va/~ut~an y~ wVa~a a Y+ NYC !iin/ ~ v ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIONTINO MAINTENANCE OIi1111CT NO.1 -- ANNEXATION N0. 46 r~ _NI N._.~ IfIIt I NI fJ' NIM I MLJ1' I JII J~ I .NIJ! ~I' ~_ a s 1~'fiTiT' i1 ~f '7'-ie;r a ~: Y i ~ ,~ /7s ~v '~ <xT! Ot EAlfCEO CI~A1[0lWA s,~ ~ - OOUM7 Ot tAlf ~IAiDD~O ~` .; ~ ~''~' aPATS Ot CIILQ~OEMA ~:... A88ES8MENT DIAGRAM STREET LIONTINQ MAINTtNANCE OIiTRICT NO.1 -- ANNlXATION NO. 4b C Z ,W .. a -- N 4 S r~ L~10 ~. ~ ~~ Erw~ ~ ~• .~In s Iwnrrl~rw ~n ,pj~wy CT!? Qt $Al~CRO CQCAI[0110A ~ _ ~*b ~'s OOVM'i 0~ aAll $IIlIASDII~O -. ~ , $lA17 0/ OALQ'0$IiY. ASSESSMENT DfAGRAM STREET LIONTINO MAINTENANCE DIST111CT N0.1 -- ANNEXATiDN N0. 4(v ` . 27 28 29 ~ t7 19 19 20 21122 23 2a 2g Z6 s 30 _~ . I _ ` t0 9 r 32 ,~ ~ IS la 13112 11 ` a a ~ i 6 ~ , ~ '!'r: 33 ~ 1 ~~ _~ .Sl \, ,i,; ~ ~ 2 'c. ' to 35 I ~ 1'., i 9,-~\.~ NI L451DE ROAD L ~- ~` 177 5,~;~:;, crnr o~ ~xcao cvcAicoro~ ~ o :,~ ~., ~ oovxr~r os w~ azer~A~aDto _; ~ ~ S'PA17 OI CALQ'oEMA , ,- -- __ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STR<eT IIGMTINp MAINTtNANCt DIST111CT Np, 1 -- AMEXATpN N0. fib ~ ,~I .I I I 1;0~"IH~It.I`~ i;6~ I;.I :SI:r~ I ~, 23 24 25 261 27 29 29 30 31 32 ~~ :S 33 ~~ - ~, 16 IS 14 34 ~ 3~ 22 2t 20 19 IB 17 ~ 1 13 35 36 9 10 \ a 12 7 yid \ 2 ~ 3 _ 4 ~ E ~~ 5 NI11510E ROA3 /7b sp~'s°d'' ; C17'! 0~ ~ANCgO CVQA~[OKOA 6 ~ STATi 01 CALQiI Aa~ESSMENT DIAGRAM S7RtET 110NTINp MAINTtNANCt p~iT111CT NO. _ _ '~XATIpN NQ 46 1 ~~ os ~'~ ~ °0~ os our ~ r°A -''~~ ~ E!'A1'S 01 CA~ORM' ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGNTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 AME)IATpN NO, 47 g I sr'~'' :~:'\" 5T6 c,~~~ C1TT OT EA~f~;gp COCAILOI~OA ODUNi? OI fAlf ~A>RDII~O aPA17 0~ CI-Z~pE~ ~T A8SES8MENT BTRLtT ~~AORAM LIGNTINp MAINTQNANCt 018TRICT NO,1 ANNtxAT1oN N0. 47 • , •~ 1r•~ l~•~ ' Y rb .. ~ ~.1i lr. ~ ' ~ .. y,~.y ~~.i~s. ~ ~~ I ~~y ~ ~ ~ 'i » ~ .S ~~ i ~ ., , r... r e 1 ~ , I >> • 1 .~ ~ ~~y7 l ~~ I s.'P~~% ~- L 6 ~~-711-- `.~.1~ ~ l ~.I I COUM'Y 0 X01 RNCA1tOMfiA ~3fa E'1'ATS 0~ - ~~ ~T ..SSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1, ANNEXATION N0. 47 ~ 1~ a- I sv~.,. CPl'Y Of SAI~CHO C~JCA~LO~iA ~g ~ sPA'PS 0~ >RMA * T '-'- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM StREE7 LIaMTIN{i MAINTtNANCE DtiTRICT N0.1 ANNlXATION N0. 47 ~ )fs3 s,~°'~`. C1T! os sAxC®0 CvCAMON~il1 OOtJlr'PY Of SA-lf ~11ASDII10 e, 6 TATS Ot QAi~ltMA r T -~ ~..~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STNEET {.IONTINO~~M~~ ~ 47 Q~sTNIC7 N0.1 /~~ ~,p~~~y. 76 t~'PY OE DQ~lO11fiA OOVII'PY o* ~1 ~ltJ1EDII~0 ~•~[~! Al CALQOR~A r T ~~ ASSES8MENT CIAGRAM 3TRElT LIGNTINO MAINTQNANC! DISfTRICT N0.1 ANNlXATgN N0. 'f 7' ~r r ~~ ~s i ~~ ~rr~avisr~ xerte or, or rxNc~b ~ I ~S ;?%`~~wY~ C1TY O~ BANCHO CaCA110NOA ,~`; ;~\ 5 ODUN'PY 01 SAN S~ASDIIr10 --~-.> ~ T ,f ~ \ auiu~ .nx~ . p 'SESSMENT CIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR CM NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 Banyan SL F lets 5861, *~ Lot A, 7racY 1; lec A, lot 32 a lot 33, Tratt 13Td8 nterror Slreel Trey; 5 ''~~Yln Ave Pa a~~ii~ken Ave Mew ~ 19.9x0 f 1. xe DH ~tl anyan 41 pa~,~, 21.2N f 1 ~ X01 4 LOH'10 a ~ BS Rici ri3n. _•n. area t7P5T _. _~ a,1:Jf1 <ix a i II,66ef1 l_tf 9~1 f T,att 1J857~ ~ ~ 5N f l 131 --tf 5951 ~raa f7eSe~ LJxafl. z ~a3.r . . ,Q121 j1 e3 y . . ,LIJaf,r Iot lU~ c°%~w, A'l~a}l~~O~>.t L1NC80 CCCM[OIIOA a _~~ ! COvs~ a s 0~ r~K :~ ~ a'1'A17 0>/ C/1l,,QlpElti~tNt1 N Ave Fa.kway 7raCt +?857 Va Mon~~.. Tract t 31a8 ' Tract 1385' ' ran ~'.,a' ASSESSMENT DIAGPgM LANDSCA,~E MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ,. r, - L,-----'I ~ I I! I I I I Ii ~_~ ii ~ ._ w~ ~ ~ -_ ~ l TE' p '' ~ ,.v,~ ~/ J .~ ,~ ~_.. 'ww ~'. 1 ~'ir-+ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ti r_ ~. ~ u ~~...~ I I I ~ II}F IiM ~~ 1 ~ 11 ~ ~',~- N - "~~ crr'uYwj~'10~~~ ~1,wC80 C>~~o~~ - ~_---• ©f ~ ~A~~O al'A17 0~ CAI~EMA - ~ N yi' 8 s' -,:: ,,, ASSESSMENT DtAC4AM LANDS APE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTINti MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 _. ; xj ~b :; ~ r r -_ _ 1~r _ ~ -- . ,. ~i r . ~.r-- ~ :~.~' ,. T~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-v i ~ ~ -.. - , _- _ ,~ i ~ ~: _ r 1~ ,,~~~~,, C1T! Of ~ANCBO COCAILONGA ~ _ ~" OOiJIi'1'! Of SAII Df~tt1ASDIIQO y: ' ~ S'PA'17 Of CAJ.U'O~iIA .~ N ~~~~~. n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSC..PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGNtIN(i MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 8 1 1 _.. _. _ t~- `~, _ ... 1 i '' ~ y x . ~ j ~ ~ ~ { ~ '~ .~ i~I 4 ~ ,I ~ i ' 4 t~ . ~~ ti ~ 1 11~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i F) ~p i ~. +` - H i ~ ~ ~.... ~ ....,. ~ I_. ~ ? ( j d ,1 ii _ '~ ~ 'd I ~ •.~ ~ ~r~~w ~i 141 4 ~ ~ ~iTc ti 1 ~~~ ~. crr~t as *utc~ Cvcruroxaa ~ r `~,' CQt1M"l 0~ !AN Ei~tA1tQII+~! `.` `~' ~ ez'~TS a' cAt,IIOtuNt~, ~ T _. AgSESSMENT DIAG' ~M LANDSG.,PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, ~ AND 4 ~9~- ~~(~ sr~ ^!~ `~~~w C11'Y 0~ L1NC80 ~CA1L0lfGA ,N;w,~\S OOUMT O~ E~ S~A=DII~O ~~' ~ aPA17 0~ CAI.1l~pENIA N A $SESSMENT DIAL 'AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 roorwa~ sa,~n.ec - -,: ~, _ ., ,. , . - . ~ x o~.=,.. r ~,~~. _. a c u ~~ ~,,; ` ' I .a © .a i ~i .m ~ ,a ' ,o. i ro. ~ JI~~~'~~ .a 'J ~w ~ ~o~ 9j'J . _-r~ur~rw~r -- - --__ ~.-.~,_~ar»rtr _ ,: ~ ~ ,. ' U" , .e 2 ~.i' u :.9 ~ b n ., C : ~: 7 goo . ~ / ,. y _ r '-]/_ ~ ~~' A .1 ~ Y ~ '. fil a. ~ V ?J! ' , ~ M i ~ av ~ ~ _ ~~ n ~ .. ~ r ~ n L s,~~'~ y_ C1TY OE EANC80 CIJC/WAI~OA ~`~ ~ COUNiT 0' >!AN 8>aNAtDII~tO `; ` ~ 8TA17 or cALQOEMA ~ T 048ES8MEN4 DIAG AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGiHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO$. 1 AND 8 _____ .~. Am,.. .auaW. ~~ ,-:--- r - _ _ 4~ ~ - _`-----c---- ----. ~~+ v.... ,-S Z. ,. ti ~.... ~ r .-~-- - -..- a o~',aaea~ slid=.~f dlI:I13~ ~- ---~~~~~~ mss , r_......... --------~ NN ~` as ~ ..... ~~ V 7. ~~ ba.~rw w ---~~, /~ S~~~w ^ crnr o~ w~cga cvcwycoxas ~~ ~ ~UN~ as ~~ S~t1AtY1IIdQ 6 es~TS a' ceto~osx~- r~_~ 4sSES9MENT z LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE'Q g RAM No. a STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Npg. ~ AND e _' ~ ~L~ r=•-= _---- ~, f. ;; ~ _,' - 1 ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~= ~ _ _~ -- - I - --- ~' I ~ i •) -~ -- -- .; ~ s. ~ ~- ~ t x/93 j"~ ,: CPPT 0~ ~--~ ~~ CCCA1[OIWA COVWI? Oy Alf B~LNA~~10 ~cl1E6Z-Z~ai `6 ~ a'PA17 0~ CAL~O~A _ N ~ r ,~ Y ~ ASSESSMENT DI' SRAM LAN05CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 9 AND 2 3" !t`7 ~~~ o~~ .pj~ry CIT! 0? L1NC80 CtTCA1[OIfGA~ S' OOVIiT! OI SAI'f D~'Ri lfAAsDINO n •'fA'!7 0~ CALU'OItMA ~~- ASSl~SSMENT Oit SRAM LAN-.3CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET ll(~HTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~~ j~~ y; Cl'PY 0! i~A~dOBO C~TQA~tOIfQA CdUl1'1'! 0! SAl1 SiLl/AilDQtO it9'A'Pl 0! CALIIOStRA ~T Lr Xnrt~it "f~" Ag3E~S3MENT DI>: `,RAAA LANDS..AVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIANTIN~ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2 ~~ _~_ A$SESSIiAENT Olp `RAM LANG..CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET L.If3HTINCi MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 "'~--~ - ter--- .T-wR+~' r, ~1 J ~. _ .. f - ti _ - ~ -_ - ~;~f~ ~ _-_ ~~. ~~ ~_ ti ~~.r,,-,~ _ - , y+ S,~iWW~'Y_ CTi? 0' ~A1iCH0 4`~1CA1IO11GA \~ OOUM'! Ot SAII D~ItAiDIN4 6 IlPA?1 01 CAt1T01RNlA A r V. ~ j~j xh~ DIAGEiAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6 ;~ i r~ ~""'?'N '~ i ~ I c > - V i = ~ ~ 4 5th ~r,, ~ aa~a _, o :,,,,, ~ ~~ /~~ `~~~ Cl'P! 08 ~A1~ICH0 CZTCAYO1tQA wurrr~r oa ewe ~su+w~o araTS o~ caro~o~- ~ T ~ Xh r hr-t- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICt NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6 ~. t_~ rrnst~Er I; ~Q I~ fW / ~ y 1~ s re sra£Er s,r ~ I I i i --y I !~.~u~ ---~ i s~rE ~1 ~ ; FuruA£ awc~~ac ~~~ s,'~~`y. Cl'1? 01 SANC~O COCA~[O1WA ~ o a ~7- COVle'PY o1 M21 DEENAtDII~10 6 a!'ATS 4>/ CALD'OEN1A •~ AS ~3MEN'~ IAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 c~ _; !1 !~ $e . ~.,.,'~ a"., =%-•:. .~ I~ i. ~! .! ,. r_~ oence~ z v ._,y~,.y, _ ~ a. . : ~ Y ,y .. ~r ' ~ 1 ~ ' i~ ,; I ~ ;s i ~ iY ]~ 1 , ~ .~ . ' ~~ ~4 . ! ~ > !li E ~i ~~ fl ~ : I >; ~ a ~~ - -° - _.r1 _ _ ~ ~ ~~ " ~ ...%~ () 5~~~~!~ . ~' • e 6 ~. CITY 01 LlNCaO C~TCA1LONdA COVNi? 01 SAN SSiNANDII~IO STATE OY CALDOtMA r t A$$ESSME{d~ DlAt,iRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 IL ~pCpURTS~ MWD R.C.W. i ~~~ 1 ~ ~`~~. ~1~ ;~~' ~ ~ -~-- crrlr or ~lArlcso cvcAUO~oA -' ~rovxrn of eAx Hsu+Aaon~o n dl'A'i'~ 0' CALQOErlIA ~ T ~- ASSML~NT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AHD 6 ~ A~ t. s,.cj~ _ C1TT 01 SAtiCSO COCA1lO1tGA p~-,Q? .,~ ;~"~+~-~, ~ OOQIr'PY Ot SAN D~NA>><DQIO ----- _; ~ ~ ~PA'P1 0>/ CALQ'a>I1~RA r T As8E88MENT DIAGFIAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 !-- .viwnwrw srfNr ..w....,.... . ` ma=r acxrl[aty t,m = I , .OP 8 F 1~ _~ _NI _I I ~, Z ' ) ~ ~ ~ ~~ + '1~ it ~ , ~ , ~~ ~ ~ Y~r..'! 5 ._. r ~ p~~ ~LEK ' " S2 E A• K ~i IAMS:I:) ' t I 1 1 r ! , ~8 Z D 73 ~ ' ~ ~ %~'~ 1 1 I I 8 ~... ~1 IS ~ 1 u GNA 71D N6 ~,,, I :l riZ w~ y Y ~~ I ~/ lY ~ri. ~.~ti ~w i Z~ ;'M YY ~~~`` ~RAC'Y ~~M1'~w iii ~I ~ `ail ;NN i9'{>s~ L - ~. _t _ ._- _~~~ S'L ~~ NlII AVI ~--- ~ ao 3 s.~,_ cn~r os ~wc$o avowacot~as ,:~„~ .~ owxr~r o>r sett a ~ - I ~.isc~7mCn r DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET ~I.GNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 - - Q-~auiTM s~arr ~' III! ~~' n ;~iIIiII ~i i l~ 1\n{_~__.T__~__f.,yl~~ __~___~__~~y it i I\ wm a~ VII i' I ~ Ii f ~ ~li ~ , -~ ~ ~~ :: __n~,~ ~~ ~ ~ II I~_ r;y -L; . j -------- ~ wa-a-.a ~~-~e-rr uli~ ,.,~ h i ~~ ~~ Ir) '~ Ipyy j T~ o.lp_y \ ~ Ir wn 7-n .ji~:l i l ~emw ..~,{ ITI ~"n a \J ~ lid r.a.r'• ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ._y ~~ Qv~e~ F ~,.r p~~w C11't 0~ ZANCBO C~JCAILOI~GA Si '!~ F`~ ~ oovrrr~r o~ esx sl~wAtaa~to .; -~ ~ _ '~SSESSM~NT DIA ~iAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANGE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 I -- y - - --~ ~;li ,~, ,,~y_ '~a ~, -v.. C 1 ~~~, ,` J ~~ j:-/ ,y~•~~• ~ `-mot ~~,:` ~ ~-C. _;_i-~.~ u_. ~r/, ~~~ NeKUe. ~s fpi~' ;;_ CT!? 0' LWC80 C0CA1t0IMA .~~\ Y 0®l1M'! O>t !!A>!f D,YtMA>RDII~fO 6 ~ arszs os c~r.~ou~rA N V ASSE~S~M~NT plt "` LANDSa;ApE 11AAINpENANCE DIS q~j ~ NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT' Npg 1 AND 6 I Por. Noah Cucemongp f .w. B. ~3nQ ~...... rl µµ JE~G.a o~~ 23 ~ I P~ ~ - ._ ~ ~ JV i, ~ ~, >~K IW.C! i~ ~: n Ii J I ~Cni~ ~J ?y~dG j ~ DEVE~~OED e y°'. ` ~-:,-~ II rn.a.-,.J,1 .... "II ~~'e Vnc~.~r e ~I~ w,. J ~~ i~ i •' 11 ~ 3 ~ --- ~: KKK I ~ O J ~. .~ ~ ~~ ~ ~D~ ~, ~'- ~_~_~ areTS o>r c~raosM,- N xrnibir= 13SESSMENT DIA~pAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRIGT kO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t ANO 6 ~J I E ~ a°~ y~a,/~~~' ;~ C'1T! C> )IAI~fC8O CZTPrAYOIWA __ ~ IwL y',}A\y ~u~l'~'Y ~~ ~~ ~~K~nQ~~ =: ~~Tj ~1 CAj~~~~ ,:, ~ _ ~T G xniv~r ~T ASSESSMENT DI..Gf~AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ! i ~,A~ ~__° . , ~~ ~+ ~ ~_ a~ ~3 T ~~= ~: !„ ?~ ';~ ~~ i ~ J .. ~ -~- gip: ..~.:.~. ~'..~ d --- ~ ~ 1! ! 1 `~ ~I ~V ~ ~ J i ~ .~` ~/ 7df:Y J ,~ _-~---~--~~...r..-- ------ . ~ ..~ .~. !i 1~ .~ i~~ ~' 3 ~~G _.~~ a~-~ ~~ CT1T O' SANC80 COCAYOI~OA ~ ~ 00lJM'!' OI AAN D~RAEDII~IO l~ ~ ~t}fi~p ~ \~ •,~~~ • ,s,i7ifi+Y• "•"•• R 1SSESSMENT DIA..RAM LANi;SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 /~ II .,~~ / '~~ ~- ~~- I ~ XW~- ~ii _ ~,„~ 1~I ~1MI ~! ~~_ ~., !~ I ~ ~;~ r , ~~--.a °m~adlww~ll ~ i i ~, ,~ \ ~~~ / ~~ I .~ ~ ~ l ~ ~a~1 ,~~ crr~r os zwc$o cocnaioxas S' ~' oovrrr~r or a~x asw~-sDn~o ' ~ ~ arszs o~ cat,~oat~tn ~: 6 '_.~_ Y ~ ~ ~~ ~ r AS~ES~BMENT DI~.GRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND p dl ~ I S~Ai~4. °~ W CITY OI L1NC80 CGCA1tOtfGA COUMT 0>t Mti ~KASDII~00 srAT, OY CAL1rpEMA ~ T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 _,f ~ ,foothll blvd. - - - V _ ~ ~ _ s _ y ro s t E s±`.s location -~ /095'5 A~tArN.tfi'. snow routs Rc,cw. giy3o ., ~: u .~ ~~~ I s,,~fLf~w . C1T! OI L1NC$0 C~TCA>I[OIWA ~~ : COtJIiTY OS IIAIi >llitllA>LDIIiO t a'1~A1']e 01 CALDIO)>tMA ~: ~' ~ N A5$E55MENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE ~ 21 ~- sir~- s.0~`~. Ci'PY O>I LWCBA CCCAYOlfOA e `F ',~$~~ COf]M? 0)t SAIf D~HA=DII~tO ^ ~~~ 6 ATATj 0~ C~* 3 DISTRICT NO$. 1 AND 6 ASSESSMENT v1AQRAM STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t AND 3 ~~ ~~ X13 I ~ ` ~_~ b '. ~.~_ car o~ ~cao cooacoa~a~ OOUI~'P'~' of ux S~NAfD~fo area o~ cnr.IIOUtu ~1 1 s' ~~ A38ES3MEIdT ..IAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 3 ..; -• r~ --- ~ ~r ,,3 t e i s s 3 iwi r_ i i F F F i i Y - I~.~ ....y. .... - i ~ 3 i ~ _ t-~.s- ~ i ? ~ i ^i~~.° J -~i S e i . a~ _~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~' ~ C ~ + ~ i ~.~J .{- Q~~ F Vi'a' ~I~~ /` LL _ Y APT ; • • • 1 '_'~ I w a e iii • s ~. ~ p a 9 a.n i~ 1 _J iiY a'Y Y i 3 S c i . _ '-- ~2~~ j,~~~ Y C1T!` 0>I sANCgO C'OCA1[OItQA ~F,~\~ COUdr'PY OI MN SaI~IAEDIIYO 6 ~ a!'ATj 01 CALDIp>LN>tA ~.~' N x!~ ~ bi - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS -1' 1 ~ ass 3 1 AND 8 si rE ,I; i S,~'~ ~. CPPT 01 SANC80 CGCAYONGA n 88•a~ `~ ~ COVM'Y OI AAtf >I~NA>R11IIQ0 ~:~~, ,~. ASSESSMENT AIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 3 ~ IM11~'IM1I~ _ y ~ ~ !~ O 1 ~i-i 1 ( 1 u 1. 1 u ~i m,pJt y "' r ~ y ~ ~ u a « 1 r ~ 11 {~ r 7 li `~ ~ 11 11 , r 'l) ~ 1'i li. 1'~11~1~ y . w m Ma~ ~: r ~u4up yMr :`, ~i I rrw,r r~ ~ 1 i~~a ~ _~ ~y, 1~ - dr~'. ~,~. a ,~ © -~ . 4«~. b.. ..... -At -fi=r-r -~ -'~ ~-iF ~~}" j,"'. CTPT 0' EANC~4 COCA1LOIf~iA ~ 1 7~ ~ OQVMR Ot SAl'f D~1t1AxDII~tO `' ~ sTA17 O~ CALD'O>!lRJ1 6 11 T y'~ ~~ -~x~i~b~t A~ ii:SSMEN~ DIAGF. M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 "~„ ii J L-~-J ~~~~ Z~R~ U~ ~.~...~. ~~~ J G~N~KO couar• F~cug Couar AceR CoueT ~ ,~jntwvw s+ '': • ,•~ s '~-~-~ SU~.1-1YGLE~.1 CcuRT Pwe~GCU~-< <oua.r ~/ 7 C1Tt Al >lAIiCIIO COCe1~tOtftiA OOtJN'Pt 0? 1lAtl D>~ttU1>~DII10 areTS o>r c~,QO~Ftn ~ T ib/ ASSESSMENT DIADFIAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND g z~ '- -- m ®i d ~ N ~IU M Sr~- r ~~ ~/g Y A~' _ crrt os L+itcuo cvcw~oxos ~/ ~' \ y COUMT 01 EAri SQ,~IA,SDII~10 ,. `67.7 ~ ~ ~ ~ i n t A93E~S~~NT OI~+GRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~, ~' ~~`~r~ ~~ ~~\~ 'Q- ~ •-°- --, ,.~ ,-.,, r r3 w.. I II i~~"'rrr tiiii ~I;~~ ~~~, I s`~'. • f= • ~= x 6 y ~~~ i ?TT11¢¢4 T¢¢T ~~l ~/`~ C1T! O~ SAI~fC30 CUCA1[OlfGA COUI~iT! O~ ~A1~1 ~NASD~iO IID(~iIII ~ a a.~A r.uF~ r~~~~~~f .~~, ~l T~ ~~ ~~xfi~o~! p ~~ rr ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 _~ ~~ ,~~'`°~., crrs o~ Lwcao cvcArotw~ s, ,^ ~ I oovrt'r~r o~ eAit saKA~n~o 6 ~ STA17 O~ CALU~OENL- ~ T ..._ c~.v.~ciii i-~ A38Eg3M1~~T DigQRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Di°~TRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N6S. t AND 6 ARROW ROUTE w w JERSEY BLVD. -. z ~ ~ ~ ~+ l JOBSIIE '} ~ < S 1 6TH STREET Y i i-tio 2a~ ' s,\. crnr o~ xnr~cao cvC~coxou . oovxri o~ ~ snu+w~n~a :. aTA17 Oll CAia'O~NlA , 5 AS~bSBM~~NT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING IrAA1NTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 -.,..o.. (l I~ I~~ ~~ J ~. ~ '..~~ S/TE ~o ®®~ yam, ~ Fi Q~~. r• O~-_ .. 4 8 I O 6 e E r. a u 0 _..~.. __. ..1W~ .. •ruw .. w.a I ~slT _ _~_.. ~r .~~..w .mow ierr~..~., n~.b+ V I I I P~6` ~= a~ a S. ~. crr~r os swKCao cocA>~oxaA Couxr: os aAx DIIt/ARDQto ~' ~ aPATi 01 CAIaO>!MA II 6 ~r ~.,. ~® . L ?J~@-~t2 AS3ESSME~IT DfApgpsM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 TT7. NQ 1352 - 2 II 14 t9 t6 V t1 19 ~ 2i ~ ~ 24 19 ~ 1 %~~~ IJ i a.. ,'... 12/111 toI ~ll>'!1 ° 1716f s141 a\ 2 x I rra~+ ..) ~ . ,- , .w~ S~ '. ~ ,r .~~ / ,.. ,~ ~.«..~...A-~ .~rv.e ~ , _ <v ~~ ' j ; J ; ~ ~~ - w ~K ,~ i i ~ u~ ~.es~w ~w ~ ~ i ._ ~ i / / / .A AITt,II~ Q~ / /, / ~..e ,_,_~ . ,_ , „i; ,'~/~ ,~~, /~~/ i/ ,/ ,, /l - ~ ~-3 ~~~ i ~i~ Y C1TT C' LANCaO C4JCA1[DI~iA i~ ~ ,~ ,.y COUM'T OI r~Al'/ sQKASDIND , ~I .. ~ arPA17 OI CAt~IIOtMA 6 ~T AS$ESSMI NT DIAC~RAIIA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 %~ ~~ .e w I t 17 If ~ 'A' J / to ~ ~ `J\ ~ ~~ T i W1 l K1 1{1 NI '~l~ P • 1 ~ °~ ~I r ,~ei r~[f rrv[ a vlG CENTER OR. pRINIW CAMfIf[R~ a`~w S~~ ~. Y ~ a. ` Lta[Ro • !TR[[T U6NT E• fTR[[T iRL[ ~s~ ~1~ ~/~~~~~L/~ ~~ Vim! i O~ MY~YYO ~VAiOrVA LOT 1 OOLTM'Y 0~ Ml~f SnNA~D~10 ^ r~ isiTs I I I 1f 1 LANG ASSESSM~~T ~IAGRAM SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Np, 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 6 3 a a~ ~ ,~ crrt os sAHCao CucA~coxaA ~, ~ Y= Cournz o~ eAK snNAaan~o ~? a'1'A17 0~ CALIIOlM, , T u~az ~~. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 J `_ fir- .~~ - ~~I'~ ~ ~ ~~"~ ~il ~. ~ ~ _ <-„ .~~y ~`~O•~ .~ ' ., < ~I i f; < I ~, It dJ ! 2 ~ h i. d.... ~...'... T.'.... ~...1 I ~ III I ~ i NIdfJJQ A ~~~n t xh; bi t "fi " .,S SSMENT DfA3RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 a+,~. ~~ C1TY O)/ lrtlCAfIL01fGA Q~~- p~~s+>AVwY' COfJf!1'!'Y OT #Al1 S><Rl'IAtDIItO ~ _..----- ` ~ arsTS os cer.~roff;HU ~ T ~. . f ASSE33ME(dT DIApRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~~ ,~~_`_~~w C1T! 0~ L1NCS0 C~TCA~[OIrQA ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ f ~ w~id~ f- .,H . A83ESSMENT AIAORAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 i ?RA^.' NG- '35»2-3 ~ .',~ ~ ,, i ,r j^ ~~ ~~ e ~ ~ e ~' ~ 4 j ~ '~ ~ ~r 1 rAr' ;~~; J ~ s4 ~ sd ,~ r`ir 1 z 3 4 e ~ 7 ~%1?r JJ f r r ~ ~ _ ~1 ~,i 51 ,~ ~ II I 14 13 t2 t t !4 9 d ~ ~r r 1I I i/// r r 46 47 4d {I ~ Id Id 17 1d 19 ~ r r 4d I . I ~ ~ r'n trJ I 44 1 ,' 43 42 41 ~ i I ~ 24 23 2! 21 ~ ~ I r t r 3d 3g 40 II 1 ~ 27 ~ 2! r r ~ II II r / t t r t r r ad _ r ~ 34 J.7 i I i = 71 3f ~ tt r t t '~ r~ G-G ~e SAj~ y~ CiMPl~lq~G~)I L11~I~C~QyO'~~T~v`iM'L^O~1~yGA ~ f.~LL/~`;,~~I WVAii Q~ W~i~ ~Mi~MYi~~ ~rf ~ ~~ 4~'j ~ STATi 41 CALU'0>RMA ~ ~ ~ '~- ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 (LOCAL) FISCAL YF,AR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER Annual Engineer's 3eport Street Lighting Maintenance District Ne. 2 :.Deal Streets Fiscal Year 1989/90 The annual report Ear Street Lighting Maintenance District No. ? Focal Str eetsl is prepared in cempl inner with the requirement cf Article 4, Chact er 1, Div is io^ 5 of the Streets and Highways Ccde, State of California i:,a nd seeping and ii ghtinq Act of 19721. This recert deals with the nro_i ected costs fcr fiscal year 1939/83 and tiie prej ected expenditures for fiscal year 19d 9/90 to determine annual assessments, 'Poe assessments will 6e used tc f'urn ish services and materials far the crdinary and usual maintenance, eperat icn, servicing and restoration of street light >.rt_orcve¢ents as provided by Southern Cal if ern is Ed>.scn Company. M.a intenance is ccnsidered cE general ben of it to ali areas within i.he District and ccsts shall be divided as indicated in the bcdy of this report. Oeta iced m,a:nT.enance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of ail or any part of any improvement providing fcr illuminaticn o£ the subject area. Street lights were constructed and >.nstalled by the developers of the indlvtdcal sahdiv is ions. The plans and street lights are stipulated in the ccn d>.t is ns of approval For each develcnment and as approved by the Eng i:reen ng Divis ica. P.ev iew of Fiscal 'tear 1983/99 891 93 As of projected d~dq et 31 139 6~33/d3 As srtt. Adr:n. .v.o"'L I~i,o]~i 1„ 5Jti Electr tc 51, JJi 23,313 75.7J9 Malnt.lOp er. -0- 16 15 b~, 504 3i,33d 49,620 Gar ing fiscal year 1933;99 t'ne following developments and lights were annexed into :Street :.ig9ting Ma >.ntenance Distn cC iJO. 2. Aliiici:_2_5,,, F.NtJ~X 27 TRACT 13471 it S.F WJIJvX 20 TRACT 0475 37 S.?. TP,ACT 12962 29 S.F. ANNEX 29 TRACT 13644 24 S.F. NJIJEX 30 TRACT 12650 35 S.F. TRACT 12050-4 6 S.i. TRACT 13715 5 5.F. TRACT 13697 4~ S.F. TRACT 13742 I7 S.?. FNN=% 31 TRACT 13319 16 S.F. ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 21, !948 TRACT 13759 232 S.F. ma,ACT 13857 T. RACT 13854 ANNEXED OCTOBER 3, 1948 TRACT 12659-1 130 S.F. hNNEXED OCTOBER 19, 1999 TRACT 13729 34 S.F. FNNEXF.D NOVEMBER 16, 1998 TRACT 13767 79 S.i. PM 10743 23 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED DECEMBER 7, 1944 TRACT 73642 19 S.F. ANNEXED DECRMHEt'. 21, I98d TRACT 13542-2 30 S.F. ANNEY,EG JAtJUI ?'i 4, 1999 TRACT 13053 74 S.?. TRACT 12332-2 I51 S.F. ANIJEXED FE3RUA.RY 1, 1999 TRACT 12895 0 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED 7PRIi 5, 1949 TRACT 11505-I 41 S.F. TRACT 13023 5 S.F. 'PRACT 155 c2-3 24 S.P. Fiscal Year 7399/90 Prcj ected Expenditues hssrt.t. Admin. $20,269 Electr is 6'J,730 Overhead 2,027 Capital Expenditure 2,534 Total $54,929 hf ter review of current expend iC Ores, projected revenue and nessibLe 1-.~ f for Street Lighting hla inten anc eyDistric t-No~. 2 can be~lowered-f tomV$23FoJ~tc $20.00 for fiscal year 1949/"90. The carr}'cver funds wi11 be used to sappert this district until assessments are received in January. The carryover amount is due in part tc Edison rebates, Unt!1 exact energy rates are established these funds Uzi L1 be reserved in part Ear passible rate increases. Lowering the assessment rate wi 11 sti11 provide suf Eicient fund inq for this district. Pr cjec ted Lights Projected Assessments 452 - 5,800 5067 at $20.00 $101,340 S - 9,600 ii GTY OF RANCHO CUOAMONGA Llghtllrg Melnf9nenca Dlst1/Ct 2 ~ --~~ SBB- ~~ s+o- Bb/BB B6/e] 81/68 BB/80 BO/BO Flscel Veer - Meoee ment Rafe flw/w' of HelNnynt MfY ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z - - ANNEXATION NO. 2 6 NIOUMOCOVt~t .il.ll TAI[l IN1 4[t[MO sillt[f 1].Opp ~ M 1[N...N A.~.1 ~i~u 711AI~ ]f.lpp q., M11 • LrNI1gM ~~ 3~ ~~~I ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONGA ~ ~ -~r, ~.,_ ~ ; COifNTY OF 8/1N B&RNASDINO -- _ L~ y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, Z -- ANNEJfATiON NO. 2 7 ASSESSMENT DIA~3AAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 44 ~CDTNiI.~ BDUlEYA0.D ~ ~ a3~ ;a~`~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONdA ~ ____.__ ~,_;'.. ' ~ COiJN°TY OF 9AN BERNARDII40 _ - '- 's 9TATL- OP CALIFORNIA ~m i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM l IGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. j ANNEXATION NO, 44 Y • _~~ A + I F.~./~ I IIiWIMO.~ I ' I ~ ~~ j • ~ J '- x. irr~ T a I ~ '~`'I ~ a _ ~{, .w~ a ~ :. I ?~ ~i1 ~..... i I ~- 1 I x' xo Is ~ ~' i % /',y. . ~ I ~! li .'/„ l li R..~ w1iY~ I~ ~~ns _ I _ _ I~ Ix ~- I. C I S s j A ~ 1 ! I 10 II ~ T npp-~ • i ~ I ~ is ~ I a II ~ r" L•• _ 111 _ - I - ~ ~I I ~ ~ ` ~ 1 t : 1~7t~Ha`a .tea. ;Jj~~.`- _. f >. CITY OD RANCHO CUCA1[ONQA ~ "1 /~;,;r,~ 5 COUNTY OF 8AN B~ARDIIdO "E~' a STATE OF CALII~ORNIA --~-=~ N r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREW IIGNTINp MAINTENANC! DISTRICT NO. Z - _ MMEXATIpN NQ 29 - --, ~~ ~ ~-' ''~ ~-~ '- i' 1 ~ ,. ~I ~ ~ .I ;~, ~, ~_I~yu a. ~ l . ~~ ~I ~_, ~~. ~. __ , ,iE3~ I i ~ ~- -- il}'~~m~ . ~ ~ ~~ I' ' t ?,,s_ _ + ~~ __ ~; i--- i~~ ~ _~ ~F.li~ _-.~r R~ ~r ~ •~ ~ _ Z q ~~A~L Ft ~a3~ af~°4 CT!! os 1tANCaO C~JCM[ONOA ~- 'ti iy OOIJM~r Or aAN HQNAaDIIdO ~: '~' ~ 8'd'ATi or cA1.IIlOEN~ ---,~-- _ _ N ASSESSMENT OIAQRAM STREET LIONTINd MAINTENANCE Oi4T1tICT NO, 2 -_ ANNEXATION NO..'JO ~yD ~;~:, cmr os aAxc$o cvc,Ntoxaa '.;.;,,~, ' ~ aotrxrY o~ a~x a=eH~tan~o n ~: ~' 3 8TA'PS of cALQOEitLA --~-.-' STREET ASSEBSIUENT DIAQgAM 41QNTINQ MAINTENANCE OIaT111CT NO. Z - '~ME7(ATgN NO..TO ~ 2 ~`~ ~ 3 ~ N I7 tf ft 11 N -- -~ ~ N r /0 I• „ b tf .71 .77 .1f J! Z f~ I s f : ,~ A ~f r II 1/ t1 ! r. N k a ":~a~ ~ COVMY p~~p ~CA~IONpA a '~~--e. ~~ A T 1--- Z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STA_EET LIGttTENO N1AtNTENANCE t)ItiTItICT NO. Z -" AAYlXATgN N0. 30 i ze 2a 2~ 2e ! 7 ! g 19 20 21 122 23 2~ s. _ ~ lg a _~!6I S ~ 16 s5 t• t3 t2 II IOI` ~~ r I = ~ `'S, 11 ( ~' 1 f F1 HILLSIDE IIOAD 29 3~ 31 ~~ - 32 33 3• 35 4 ~f d2: i 3 ,5'1 2 Jy V si; ~ ~ ~~' s ~'q' S ~~~ :~i~ : C1T! Q! 3MIC80 CVCAI[Q1'WA y~ ~' OOUIi'P'Y Ol 9AN BELNAED~10 ;~.i 5 A88E38MEINT {~IAQRAM $TflEET LIQNTIN4 MAINTENANCR DISTRICT Np, 2 ANlE.XAT1gN NQ 30 I ~ I,e~ ~ ~;1 i ~;u19 ~H ~ ~f~ ~~ ~; i ~F ~' '~ ~ I Z9 30 3 f 32 ' . 23 24 25 261 27 2B ~,S 33 - l i.' i 22 121 20 f 9 t e ~ ~ ~ 56 ~ - i t3 3S 9 ` i LO z a t 1 > ~ l't s ... •- z z i ~ ~ '~ 5 g\\4 \ 1 HILLSIDE g0A0 ~,~~ ~~ ~ ;~%`'~t~~Di^ C'Pl'! Ol I~ANC80 C~JC~AYOI~OA ;~~,\ ~ ~iJN'PY 0>r aAN aT~NA~IItO ;: ~ ~ 8TA'PI< O>t CAL1lpllN~A STREET ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM L14NTING MAINTENANCt OIST111CT ANNlXATiON Na .so '~ i f I n F ~- t N i t N 2 } a%~,' CPP'~ 0~ EA~1C80 CCC~NL011GA -._.,T 1~ o... AitUTt t; tlA/R1Mt R t~ .~ ASSESSMENT DIAQRAM STREET LIGNTINO MAINTENANCe D13TRICT NO. Z ANNEXATIDN NO. 31 ;:.._..; -- _~ l « .w. ~r ~ ~ ~ _ t~ 14 '' ~ ,• • I •~ ~ 1 • 1 • r 1 I ~ ?i 1 _.. ,i; .'k=: ~" .gym ~ °,..~;.~ `' ~ w ,q ; 'I" • ~ • n •~~ fl .,:iT ~'.. tu. . •..t • .'.f9:....... H •` U N ~ O ~1 I{ j 1 y~ 1 `7L ~1 x„~~ -~--- .~ i~~ 'i ql+ i 1 ~ ~ ~~~ C ~ , . ~ , . ~ v~ y_ CITY Oi EANCBO CCCAYONOA '~ Y COUI~1'R1! Of MN BstNAaDIIiO _; ~ BTATi Of CALUORNL- p-s~e~SMENT DhpRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 5TAEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N05. 1 AND ~ ~ ~~k~ :~% Cl'PY OP L1~tCII0 CO~A~tOlK1A `;. ' ~.y a4tJi~l'S 01 MN Di~NA~IIYO 6 1RA17 0~ CAtd~O~IRA -~--~ __ ~, ~w ASSESSMENT DI' TRAM LANDaCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~~ II ~I l 1'~ ~ ~t~7 Qa'iT 4s 11iinDSO ~O~L'0lMA i, `~~ ~ 001JM'Y 01 SAIf DSRN/1~II~14 S7' A.'~7 0~ CALU~O>aN~A ~ r ~->~- ~ ~v Exh~b~f ASSESSMENT DI..GRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 .,.~ydgy.~.,e.a.- ti^L4s_ ~' f SAS ~B ~a ~~~ ~I it } 1. ;~ it ~ 3 f,l / '~5~ ` ~~ ~ ` - ~~ '~ ~ ,~~ ~~ ~ ~~ .... ,,,_ ~~~ ,,~~ = '_~"~ C!'1'! Olr >tAIiCaO C1JCA~LOIIQA COUli'1'! 0~ MII Ei1DfASDIIiO ~~~ ~ a~rD>u~- N CXi'7i17/f' "~" --- ASSESSMENT OIA `;RAM LANDS..APE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIOHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~ a~/9 i~%'~~Y. C3'lT 07 ~ANCI~O CITCw1ii0110A ., ~ OOUlAT 0~ Mit 3ittfAiDWO __~__ ^.a~a3~nnENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIP3HTINp MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~~ ~~~wti C1'P!' 0~ ~ANCl~p CVO/W0~ y ,,6 ' ~ OOUM'L' 0~ d~Alf ~N/1sDII~fO araas os c ~ ASSESSMENT DIAvRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 HRL7KEN STAR , COURT ~L ~- MWD ii.C. W. I~ L l ~' i ~~_ _ _. ~~ ~~i ~~%` crrt o> >uxcao cva-uoxo~ .„~ ' covx~r os aAx ~~n>xo n sreTll o' earn~o>I:x>A ~ T _.• ~I L I AS~`$311Kl:NY ~dIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 c' i G _ ~; i '' ~ ~~~' ~I i~ i ~! S 1e l ~ ,~:r-~ ..., b . . L+T~° r asntEL 2 ~CEL i m. ~.rJ a r ~~ ~s Ceti ...%~ " j,;~~~~'' ;- CP1T 0)I ~ANC80 GRCAIIOIIOA • ~~,\: OOUHTY O)I aAN ~ PM I t~7£3 = ~:~ ~ ~KAZDDiO -• 6 al°AT>t 0>t CALQ~O)RNl T a `-~ h 77 '. ~ 7 I ' ~I ~ 3! j~ ~ ,~•il ~~ ~ ~~ ~, ~FI~,: ASSESSMEPiT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINtENANCF DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 4 Y~ ,. ,...... 4p- i .i 1 I d I w~~)IIfVrv aral/s ~~ ,r c a a a x! s e i, a : a e 3 ~laAmltatr qm l 3 :taY Z I ~! ~. ~ !,~'i,~'~~ ~ .I if i~I~ M .~ II 1 O ~ ~.a_.. •r t ~ + ii - ' ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ RIMI: A I ' ~uwu ~-.'pYa ~ ~n ~ , ~_ ar~y~~ +AAL't ,l~~ ~ lNi1 a I ail. qW {D M~ _ 'Li~S ..~ ~~ MAIL AVa ' -~ ~~3 }?~'~`Y. CITY 0)/ =AI~fC80 COCA>II[OIWA :'' ~ ~ OOVM'r "" 'U1N a1~'WASDDIIO ?. `` t ', -IIr w~~~, A~ ESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO$. 1 AND 2 rrr. Nd - -~3~.aa - z II ~• is ~ is ~ i' i• ie zo z~ za za z. Ig , ,~ ~z ~~ ~0 9 e ~ a e ~ a ~ ~//~ ''/, ,~//~/ sd ; //~ Cvtir ~ ~ ~ ; d~, ,/ ~~ , / , / // ~, ~ ' ,,~ , ~ I I .... ~; / ~7 ~. i .. ~ ~~~ , ry ~ ,.4 % `,/ rvrvrr ~ / , ~4 ~ , J _, :.. rr r...~ % ~ i i , i _ ~ `, ~ ~r ~ -- ----- - ~ ~~5 ' / t p~~ y,' ,. CPtT 0>t L1NCa0 CQOAYOI/GA _ ~;~= OOUM'Y 01 Mrf Dgl'IARDII'10 e -. ~ I ~SSESSM~~17 poq RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 STREET ~IGMTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 rtor+~crset+y Nkhut ~ci`'~ Y "~ ,. ..~\s ~:~_~ CTP! 0~ LWCaO CCCM[OI~Qw COVNP! 0~ MI0 D~ASDIIrO S1'A17 O~ CALQ~OINu - _. N ~~~~'~ ASSE~~~M ~ N DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i STREET LIGMTINf3 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 NIO411D A ~ }~ a S~ ~~~~ ; C1T! O>t LI1~CH0 C~JC~Ait4>tQA '-_• I s ~' OOVM'! 0>t Wf ~f/~p ~Xl~~ a~ A' iESSMENT DIAG~. .M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i STREET LIflNTINfl MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ..I._...~,.f. J l./~ ~',A$R~tt 'Dt~~ ve rw ~ ~~ li G~NgKO co~ar/ MORLLS Ce4~T/ Focus COURT - ACGfL ,UItT " ,. a 'r; ' ~ -~ C $Uh1N'(G,LMA lpuRT _.sL /0wnegv.Y ccusr CR'Z O~ EAtiClLO CTJDA1t0!«'!A OOVI~P1' a~ dAlt DELNA1aII'10 ar~TS os c~taou~nuu r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE IAINTENANCE OIgTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIONTINp MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 'RA;,7 ~ ,,, ~ ~ ~ ~s N0. 35.~-y L~_ i i y ~ I ~ \~ I C I e6 ~/~~i/~ ! 1 2 13 I 4 I 0 1 6 / 7 32 ~ ~~lN~l' 44 ~- ~ ~~~ 4J 42 41 ~; 12D 24 2.7 2! ~~ ~~ I 21 ~ i i i i. ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ 27 ~ 2! i i ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ r i ~ ~ ~ ~ i l ' S 71 i ~ ~; / St •00 49 fl j 14 IJ 12 11 Ip y 0 ~ %// ~ ~ 47 {~ II i 10 1!5 f7 10 19 ~ ~~ ~~~ I ~i' i i/ / a~~ ~/ %% ,`/~~/ /~~ i l~ i i/ -0% crir: os s~wcso cocw~oxos ~~~ oovxr~r os ewe ~w~n~ro i ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT ~I I i i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DdSTRICT NO.3 i I (VICTORIA) I i i FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 I II I CITY OF RAIQCHO CUCAb10NGA I, SU[3MITTED FY: ASSESSMENT REVF,NUE ADMINISTRATION i ~ APPROVED: _ RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CI'PY F,NGINEER hnnual Engineer's P,eport Street Lighting Maintenance District tJo. 3 'i Victor is 2lanned COmS(:u^it_vl r fiscal Year 1989190 The annual retort for Street :,ightiaq Maintenance District Ne. 3 ;Victor is ?lanned Conscunityl is prepared in tempi is nce wit:n the requirement cf Article <, Chapter i. Dtvis ion S of the Streets and High~aays Code, State of Cal iECrn is I:.and scaping and ~ight i.^.g Act of 19721. ~ .. ~t __t 1. __ `_?;_ __ __ted __ctc fn £i__al _ 19Ffi/p9 and the crojected expenditures for fiscal year 1999j9p cto dot errt.ine the net essay}' a sses scent rate. The assessments will be used to Eur ^ish services and dater ials far the crd inary and usual rte intenance, operation, servicing ar,d r estcraticn of street light imprcvements as provided 6y Southern Califcrnxa Edison Company. Maintenance is cops idered tc be of general benefit to aR areas within the district and costs she 11 be div iced as indicated in the bed'y cf t;;is repot. Getailed maintc^, a..^,ca activities ipc lode the repair, removal or replacement cf all or any part o; any irt~provement providing for the ilium inati on of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the indiv ideal subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as st ioulated in the coedit ices of aporcval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Gtvision. r iscai Fear i96d/99 neview Projected Annual Costs dd 789 As of Projected 9'~dget 3/31 iB9 6130/89 As sr„t. Fdrz i:',. Ii,7iJ II,75J 11,7oJ Electric ,5,7J7 25,252 45,JJ9 57,75] ]7,J'.2 Si,759 Gun ag fiscal year 1939;39 the fo11a>~:,ny cr ojecis within the Virtera ?!ace ed Conai.anity were annexed into Street Liyht iity Matatena nce bistrict 1Jo. 7. ANNEX 9 PM 975J 205 ASST. ^iJITS ni ,r.v; - 'P?ACT 112d7 205 S.P. T3ACT 1975] 132 S.F. T3ACT 1]290 152 S.P. °. •.'.s dirt n rt axpen enced normal cad rcatine expenditures during the current Eiscal year. r'iscal Year 7993/99 2rojected Exnend itures Assort. Adm.rn. 517,329 Electric 43,300 Overhead 1,333 Capital 'excenditures 1,%41 Sb5,062 ._ of _ _^. •a itc.es __ art cA rave *. ~]4, _nA nrnjrrt rd rerrynvrr 1552 ,~0301~it~ has 'c een determinedY^that the assessment rate fcr Street Lighting District No. 3 can be lowered from 527.00 to 523.00 per assessment unit. T~ne crej acted carryover funds wili bz used tc sacpert this district ant it assessments are recetved during January. Fro ;acted Lights Prc jetted Fss essments 504 - 9,200 34A2 x 520.00 - $69,043 5 - 9,500 G . Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Llghtlng lAelntenexe D/str/of No. 3 azo- .. ..,.. ^~ ator ..... .. ; eeie~ enae salsa eaiuo .,.... ~. ~' Faewrtront Rote Mvllw oI AN~rylrl/nf MM ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. .3 ANNEXATION NO. 9 H IGHL ANO AVENUE ..T ._.Y ..~~ i 1 5. R R.it, _ ~~i _.. ~h r Ir - i Iy - t L 1 r W. ~• u~~y~~y SI•• T •~ '-~ err r swse~~ne rto.so - ~~~ ~~~3 ~ ~vi`~!a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONOA ~~ > (_ w :~~~_ COU'NTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO „ '~' Z STATE OF CALII~ORNLA ,m N ASSE53MEPIT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTpICT NO. ~ AND 3 j .t ~r i ~~ l • x ~~: ~ti~i i _'- / ' .I -------- .u)- __ ~,- -'--~` ~ ~ ~ f i e~ 1 ~-~~ f+ C ~~~-~ • 1 d A ~i ~~f ~~~~;~ .1 :: 3iS ~~ ~ : i i ~a . , a .~ , ~, "J .. . ,~ ~:I . . ~'a _ l l I . a u - ~ ~ i w M1 7' i • ~ ~ ~~ ,..~' .~~~,! w ~ -~~ o , I y~~%~ ~.~~~-~ =~ ~~ '~'.~` '~~ ~~ :~ dF, ;' r ~.~ _ ~~' ~. , ~-~'~° `7 ryw~a*}i~~~ M{~~y~f y}~yY/~A Wrn~i ~~ o/Y! Yi~ftA~~V n E:UiIB1: "A" AR3E93MENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGMTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Nd. 1 AND 3 ~I GI .~ ~W ~ ^ w _~~ ~ YY\A 4~~ ~ ~~~5 i y~°~~ Y. `. ;~ GrP! 0~ L1ZICa0 COCA~LONOA ~ ~ /3?53 OOUlRZ Ot '"AIf D~lI..:AIItO ------ ~.... ~'!A'1'11 r.., ~~~'.'~ F%11Ltli1 'A' A'J9EESMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t AND 3 iz I, ~, ~'~ G~~ y,~i~'4, C1TT O>/ sA~1Cla'[0 CtlCA1L011QA e `~L OOUl1'PY O)- fAI1 DEitfAED1N0 ~ srs~rs o~ alsa~o~- ~T --,~- o~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 (TERRA VISTA) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CPCY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMCCPE D BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSF,LL MAGL'IRE, CITY ENGINEER Annual Engineer's Repcrt Street Lighting Naintena nce District Ne. 4 ~ Terra Vista Phan ed COmin'dn1tV ~ Fiscal Year 1909/93 The annual report fcr Street Li yhtinq Maintenance District No. 4 !Tetra Vista Planned Cemur:anityi is prenar ed in compliance with the requ it eaents of Article 4, Chapter ., Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Cade, State cf Ca11EOCn is ;Landscaping and Lighting Act cf 1972). T'nic rannrt daalc wits tea nr rriarY ad rnc+c fnr ftaral vPar 19FA/R9 anA tha prcj ected expenditures Ecr fiscal year 1909/90 tc determine annual assessment rates. The assessments will Ce used to Eurnish services and materials Ear the ordinary and usual maintenance, operations, servicing and restoraticn of street light improvements as provided 6y Soathern California Edison Comoany. Maintenance is consider ed cf general benefit to all areas >.n the D>strict and casts shall be divided as indicated in the body cf this repo C. Detailed Maintenance actin it ies include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part cE any imprcv_ment providing fcr iilnminatior. of the subject area. Street lights were constructed by the developers for the individual subd iv isi c:.s. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the coedit ices cf approval for each development and as approved by the Eng ine er~ng Division. Fiscal Year 1988/89 Review Projected Actual Costs 89/99 As cf i-rcjec ted Bnaget -0;30/89 8/33/89 AssM,t, Adml~. ",443 7,443 7,443 Eiec tr:c 3J, 3JJ 11,431 25,JJJ li,447 '9,921 l2,44J Street ~ightiay Maintenance District Nc. 4 experienced normal and rcnttae expo nJ ltures der ing the earrent fiscal year. During fiscal year 190 ?; 03 the fcllawiag prcjec is were annexed to tuts da tr is t: WJPiEX 1 FM 9534 77 ASST. UNIT5 m - ii TRACT 13270rv~u~ '140 S.F. TRAC'P 13273 128 S.F. ANNEX OCTOBER 19, 1988 eN, 989 % 33 ASST. UIJITS PM 11341 23 ASST. UNITS MARCH 1, 1989 T.°CT 14150 54 ASST. UNLTS PN, 11037 153 FSST. UNITS Fiscal Year 7989/90 Projected Expenditures Assmt. Admin. 11,352 Electric s3, 090 1,135 arnaa. Capital expend. 1,419 d6.905 After review of current expenditures, prcjected carryover ;545,970;, crejec ted expenditures and revenue it has been determined that the a ss essm.eat rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 for fiscal year 1939/99 can be laweced from. $22.00 tc $20.90 per assessment unit. The projected carryover wll1 be used to fund this district until assessments are received in January. The large carrycver amount is due in part to Edison rebates. Until exact energy rates are established these funds w>.I1 be reserved in part Eoe possihle rate increases. Frojeted Ligats Projected Assessrcsnts li4 - 5800 2B3B x $20.C0 = 556,%60 15 - 9507 1 - 22009 1 - 27500 m G ~ Y OF RANCHO CUCA,'v10,NGA Llghtirg MelntenellCe DlstflCt No. 4 Sao ~r' / "\.... .. ......... ... .. ^~ ~°aiee eeie~ eves ee,~ec evuo n.a .. beeeament Rs!e H/!lM OI .WMeMt MM r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STRHET LI(3NTINCi MAINTQNANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATWN NO. t3 VALENCIA cj~~ ~-~ , W 2 4i 7 TERRA VISTA VILLADE ~I >~ P.M. 9504 i` BASE I,~NB GOAD -sEee 1:.:~s ~~~~ 1-K,ooo L+rny Jd~~ ~ a~i ,.~~~ crr~r of aAxcso cvcA~oxas ~ ~,n~ s~ ~ ,. . _; . COIINPY OF 8AN BEExA8DII~10 -";~' : BTATE 0! CALQ'ORMA ,. --- ~ ASS S~MENT DIA ~RpM LANG„CgpE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIf3NTiN0 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~,, ._-~~I' X1,1 I ;~ a.~.,-. =sue ~_ ~ ~ X21 .n x_11 ~ _~l l~~ ~,~~J^~~ ~ ~~yl ` w / 1\~ _ \ `~ ~ Z _, ~--~. .~,-~ .:~ 11 _ 1 `y. ~~` ~ ~~ 7.~ y~°~4. C1T! O>r LwC~p Qpq~O„OA ,.~s covrrr~r os auH >~ASanro ~_~~' ~ S'PA'PS O)/ CALp~D»eN]G T ~~ o ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 5,~;~ ~.~. ~~ ~ s ~-~ a ~3 crir~r o~ ~-xc~o cvcwtiora~ ..__ oocrxr~r os e~x s~x,~~ cress o~ cwt,u~osMn 'T Ass~S31NENT 01~ 3RAM LANv~CAPE MAINTENANCE D STREET LIGHTING MAINTENAN (STRICT NO 4 CE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~~~- a~~~ y~'~"~: Ol'1"t os ~. :.~~~ Oovrrr~r 0~ e~~ ~°'~ _~ ~ al'A17 0>/ CALII~p>WIA n ASSESSM ~NT DIAP9AM LANDS APE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO a STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND s __, ,•' ,; l ~~ A-._ .. ~ yn _ ^ 1 i i -~ ~ i - } ~ ~ ~ .. ~~ ~ t. ~ ~ .r. 4+ 1 ~ --- _ 'ti . i~ `~ ~^ ~ ~ ~~~ 1 ~ ~~~~ ~ z -~~ f ~ 1 ~ 1 J . "~: - ~ r +...y ~~~_~ ~s~r__,~s~~~- ~~1 ~_ y ~ ~ ~~ srt'~r ~~ ,pj~~y ~~Z ~~ ~Q r~~n~ S' , ~v~Y o1 ~^K •E~KAY~~I •D~ a 'i O i A~ 0~ CA~~M ~, '~'7R"'~ AaSESSMENI' OIACi' 4N9 LANDSG..PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET IIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. S AND 4 3 ~~ t~~~Y, CITY O~ SAt~CDO CpQA1[0>r6A _,,~ COUIrI'Y Ol EAN D~tttASDENO .... LF - ^~~~~~Menr DINpRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTEWANCE DISTRICT NA 4 STREET IIGMTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 4 ~ ~y -- rte-' ~ QI s~ D~a.~ D oarl®e ,....._ ~ :~ ~ ~~~TTTTTrrrr~ d ' ~~'~1~~~~~~~ ~l ~ ~-~ ~. ID~C~IIII Y ~~--- ~~ ~rrTTTT~1l~~°°r ~ ~~ ~tllrl~ ~~=~~ ___.__~ ~ T 1~~~ ~~. - .i..,:f,: ~Y.~ ~I ,... _ a~~ ~ ~ i `~~• 0~ t --~-- C~Y 0~ 1ANCa0 CVCA1tOIW~ CflUM'i ~ SAKI D~rA~Wp aPA17 OS CALIIO~lgA ~T i ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARl'N) ~. i ^ i I FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .''. I. j SUF3MITTED I3Y: ASSESSMENT REVF.NUF. ADMINISTRATION AF'PROVF,ll: RUSSELL MAGUIRF., CITY ENGINEER ..- Annual 2ngineer's Repcrt Street Lighting Kain tenance District No. 5 Caryn ?lanned Ccrcununity Fiscal Year 1999/9) The annual report fer Street :.ighCing Maintenance District Ne, 5 iCar}': ?lamed COmIiPJ.lityl a crepared in compliance with the requ it em eat of Article 4, C~apter 1, Divisicn 5 cf the Streets and Highways lode, State cf ('al~inreia "_a_eA Cr_a_pi n~ a__n rl I~rn F_,_en drF n_F 10'l)I y n Tn is report deals witn the crcjected costs Eor Eiscal year 1988/89 a.^.d tha crcjected extend itures for fiscal }'ear 1999/90 to determine annual asse ssrt:ent rates. The assessments will Ce used tc f•Jrn_sh services cad materials for tBe ordinary and usual ¢a>.atena nce, operatics. servicing and restcraticn cf street light :mprcvert;ents as provided Cy Scuthera California cdison Company. Ma intena ace is considered of ge r.eral 'o en of it tc all areas is the G'_s tr ict and costs shall Ce divided as indicated in the Cody cf this repot. Detailed maintenance activit>.es tnc ].ode the repair, removal or replacement of all cr any part of any improvement providing for illumination of £::e sucject area. Street 1lghts were constructed and Installed by the developers for the lndl'J ld'Jdl subdivisions. The plzns and street lights are as stipulated in the cmld it lulu of approval fui eecL development and as approved by the cng sneering Divisicn. Rrcjected Rxpend itures 99'33 As of Projected ?pdget 3!31;99 5/33/89 Fs smt. hdn in. Id98 Id96 1895 l ectr is 75)9 2212 4500 9395 4109 0396 Street :.ignt my hta intena ace Gi strict Ne. 5 experienced normal and rcutine expend ltures d~.;rinq t'ne cd rr ent Eiscal year. - 11 TRACT 12043 49 S.F. TRACT 13555 47 S.F. TRAC: 13556 40 S.F. TRACT 1755fi 52 S.F. TRACT 17550 73 S.F. TRACT 13561 43 S.F. TRACT 13563 44 S.F. Projects annexed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 during 1989/83 were: Fiscal Yeac 1985/90 Projected Expenditures Assessment A.dm in. 3756 Electric gJJO nvarn>ad d7n Capital Expend. _G70 ~~ 12,696 After revs=_w cf marr ent expzndi YUr es, crojected carryover ;$19,0701, projected expenditures and revenue it has peen determined that tha assessment rate far Street Lighting Ma intena r,ce District Nc. 5 fcr fiscal year 13g 9/90 can be lowered to $20.00 The projected carryover wi11 be used to fund this district until assessments are received in January. Projected Lights ?rojected Assessments 31 - SB JO 939 x $20.00 = $!8,7BC 2 - 9500 m GTY OF RANCHO CUG4MONGA LlphNng Melnfsnerrce .^.fslrtof .NO. 6 ~: ., Opp. .. . ..., ~ .., 26~ ., .... .. ., 20l ... .,. .. 16., . ~ ,, .. ... .. . . .., .l ..... , i ... ., .... ... ' b B)/BB 88/BG B9/W Fiuv wr '~ AIddOD^fs.^.: PdN Mt~w el /rr~rivrf /YM ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STAEET LIGHTING INAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION N0. 3 ~~ ~.,. _ ~ ~o ~ u if s n w ~ t2 » s l h s s " I ~_ s o~ s ~a u u a m s s u s ~ - TURF ~~.'~' GNUUNU CUVtI( ';3rti _ ~ `.Z TURF ARF,~1 0 S.F, 3.SF-3 7 C1TY OF RANCHO CUCA][ONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO U arlsls GROUND CQYER AREA 30,N0 S.F. N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION N0. 3 i ~~ ~ n s ~ • i ~ i .~-- / f~ 7. 1f p p p 1f M p ~ 11 n nrssas~»a+as ~.1~i~~IMI~I~IAI~I>,<l~ - TURf F~ ~aouwo coVER TURF ~ 6::6. - - 1,030 S.F. .~ ~~3 ~`~~. ~ ". -_'~,: -J~-FA?" a CITY OF BANC80 CUCA1[ONOA COUNTY OF 9AN BbBNARDII~(0 8TAT8 OF CAI.IIIORNIA GADUNS, COVER A~ 41,660 S.F. N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.5 ANNEXATION NO. 3 TURF Q GROUND COVER TURF A~t~1 GROUND COVER AREA 4,atiu S.F. 31,~3U 3.F. ~~ ~,,~~. crr~r o~ aAxcao cucAl~oxaA --:: _-= ;`y,-~: = cocrrrr~r op eAx a~axAaDnvo :. ~-~ 3 8TAT8 Op CAI.IIrORMA ~ T ' -' ~ 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0,5 ANNEXATION NO. 3 ` n a n I m l at I C I ... a I ~ .. 3 a as >s ~ ~ III "'"-~,~,~ s a I u ty a is ti tt to .~~' n ~ s • ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ si a• ®~ ~, .~ w' n " ~° i t u TURF TURF AR © GROUND COVER -~ R UN COVER AREA ~.:.x r.€. ce ~..... 3q#~ ~ ~ S '.~i ~~ '^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONdA ~. ~~ !~ CAUIV'TY OF 8AN BERNARDIIdO +~3r~ .: `~' = 8TAT13 OF CAE.IFO]RNJfA `~ N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.S ANrEXAT1ON NO. 3 TURF GROUNO COVER TURF ARF~ 2,010 S.F. ~o ~O ~P GROUND CpVER AREA x,345 S.F. ~;~~~. crr~r of iuxcao cvcnuoxas '--"~': comer oa eerr »axw~nvo _. ~ 3 ~~~ o>r cwz.>goaxiJ- N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.,S ANNEXATION NO. 3 TURF ~'~'-- GROUND COVER TURF AREA 0 S.f. ~ ~~~ GROUND OV R AREA 48,780 S.F. :~i`~':, CITY OF RANCHO CUeAIIONdA ~~ . ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDIIdO ,l~ 3r~ _: STATE OF CALII~ORNU ~T t , ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM JGHTING MAINTENANCE 0lSTRICT NO.S ANNEXATION NO. 3 ,,aa, ,\ ~ . +~ is b N 19 N 4 is n u x a nnnrasan sr i~ p u ~ ~o~'a ~~ uu~n~oyaaja~an -TURF TURF AREA GROUND COVER 6 pyD g ~ ~-~ ~~ ~ GROUND COVER AREA 9,M0 S.P. ;a. ., ? .-j,~ .. 3 - ~~, CI P11 OP RANCHO CUCAIdON(}A COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDII~fO sTATE OF CALtP'ORNIA _ N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTI;JG :MAINIEtJANCE DISTRICT tJO. 5 -,~^/an SI P2 .='s Sd~6t, Tr ~. ~; A, 7rac1 tai ^ Lot 32 8 ' ~ 3. Tract 13749 Ave. Parkway iracll3957 1ve, Median ~ !~O c^~L. C~ Q~ )I,AHCBG ~r+A1~GirGA ~ ; ,w' ; =,~\ = OOVI~1'!'Y 0)R MN B>aKAI~DIIt(0 -• ~ 8TA'1'1< OP CAL>!'OllIIdIA TnArrs I.74e. • ~ T 13957 i IJdSd ~- -'-" ~VI MII( ~- ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 (COMMERCIAIJINDUSTRIAL) I i~ I s FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION ~ APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER Street Lighting Maintenance District No. o hnnuai Engineer's ..°,eport Com¢ercial/Industrial F Lscal Year 1969/90 i The annual report for Street Light inq Maintenance Cistrict No. 5 Cercrc,ercialiIndustriall is prenared in com,plia nce wit.*. the requirement cE Article 4, Chapter 7, Division 5, cf the Streets and Highways Code, State cf Cal tf crnia !iandscap;ng and Lighting Act cE 19721. This reC01't Oed1S with th2 Gr CjeCted COStS fOr Eincal Vear 19fl9/a9 and t::E projected expenditures far fiscal year !909/90 tc determine the annual assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish services and rcater ials fcr the ordinary and usual maintenance, caeration s, servicing and restoration, of street light tmproverten is as provided by Sc'athern Calif ornxa Edison Company. Maintenance is considered to t_ o: general benefit to all areas in the district and costs shall be div idea as indicated in the belly cE this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 was established for Commercial and/cr Industrial properties mainly within t;;^.e Industrial end eoothiil Sp_cif is plan areas. P.r ens included in the work program axe the street lights within the rights-cf-way ar designated easements eE streets dedicated to the City and are limited to local streets. The work programs excludes maintenance of street lights in rights-ef-way cE major streets. Detailed ¢aint enance activities include the repair, removal cr reniacement eE ail or any part. of any impraveioent pr ovidiny fur the illumination of the sutject area. ~~. o~L :.y,. ,.., .. ~..~ .,..,,. L. ....L~ .. ...... ............,. .,i ..... ..~._.., r,.... .... ,..._ indtvtdeal urejects within the district. The plans and street lights are as stipa fated in the ccaditioas cE approval fcr each develoome.^.t and as accrcved by t:~e e~giaeering Ci~isten. I 91sca1 Year 1999;99 3eview e0i89 pr ejected Budget 85.70/33 Ps st. Atl;;un 2,712 2,012 E lectr tc 4,780 2,077 5,817 5,012 Expend: Care^= fcr fiscal year 1909/09 weee law. 1'he follow't ng projects were r. vain run a dnri nm ri cr T.NNEY. I Cp 87-% 62 ASST. UNITS ANNEX DR d7-15 i ASST . UNIT ANNEX 15 DP. 85-43 5 ASST . UNITS ANNEX to CllP 37-GS .' ASST . UNITS DR Bo-32 1.2 ASST . UNITS avvc_v ,i DR 97-41 2.55 n,SST . UNITS CUP 37-42 4.E4 ASJ'T . UtJITS ANNEX 73 PM IG94i 14.53 ASST . UNITS DR 37-52 175 ASST . UNITS CU? 57-19 7.74 ASST . UNITS ANNEXED SEPTEMEEP. 27, :998 Dn 97-20 0.7 ASST. UNITS DR 97-99 15 ASST. UNITS CUP 95-19 6 ASST. UNITS ]uYNEXED GCTOEER 5, 1983 CUP 97-16 16 ASST. UNITS CL'? 97-26 21 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 2, 19dB DR d'-61 J 7 ASST. ~T. / UNITS V11Y•y AIVIJEXED DECEMHER i, 79 99 DR 99-19 9.5 ASST. UNITS ?k IJ2d9 9 ASST. UIJITS ANNE%ED GECEMSER 27, 1389 GR d6-P 12 ASST. UNITS WJIJEXEC SWJUARY 4, 1939 DR d7-17 1.4 ASST. UNITS UR di-19 II ASST. L'N ITS Da a7-2~ MDR 39-I9 19 ASST. UNITS _ - ca GP.r 97~51y 20 .59oASST. ii UNITS DR d8-29 8.10 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED FEBRUARY 15, 1989 PM 10981 36.56 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED MARCH 15, 1989 DR 87-06 21.6 ASST. UNITS DR 86-16 6 ASST. UNLTS ANNEXED APRIL 5, 1939 DR 87-44 3 ASST. UNITS DR 87-42 7.28 ASST. UNLTS I Fiscal Year 1989/90 Prcjected Expenditures Assmt. Admin. 2,272 Electric 4,200 Overhead 284 Capital 284 7,040 Pzaj ected P,evenue 568/un>.ts x 520.00 = $11,360 The rate of development and acceptance of street lighting w>.thin Street i>.ghtiag Maintenance District No. 6 will determine the actual expenditures of energy charges. It has been determined that an assessment rate of $25,00 ue~ ess ea mi,eu~ :,au ue iuw ea ou w e2v.6 ~. GTY OF RANCHO C(IC~4MONGA Llphtlnp MelntenBnce DlsfACt No. B 30 26 ~- ... .... .. .... ... ........ ... ... .. ... 20 i..... .., ..... .. ..........--- ~~I 16 :.., ., ., .. .. .. .. ...... ............ ... .. ... .. I i nw r~ -^ bew~men! RHs BO/(q HMhr el ANwm'nt qMw ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. (o ANNEXATION NO. i 3 .aeOM _ ._T__ _. ~_ .' e~~r~ ~ ' ~ ~~ , Y ~ ~ ' u _ __ _ J~ I ~ : ~ ~ I`J ~~ ~ .'FBI i~. • •l ~ ~ 'I • _ i ~ 1 •• Jf i I 3 ~ ' f~ 3 W i f i ~ . ~ ~ ll -a - I = I a + ~' ~, f ~ " n ~ I'~ b 'r ~ ~_ 1 4 ` iJ. t,~~ ~~` ~ ~`~ .~l S.~ _L ...e1 . ? • ~ v , ~:,ar~ i a~ _ ~~ ~ 'T/~ ~:` " +;, '• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONOA ; ~! r~~, COUNTY OF 8AN BEBIVARDIIVO _. ~~' i STATE OF CALIFORNIA N _~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING h1AINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION NO. 14- ~ITF ~rorwi~~ ii .....w ~ 'aMti W OM~YM ~ ~~ MIpM111 ' MOLE ""4 `11{MOwI/~ ~ IIOIM~ L_ __.._ _.~~ W .~M ' ~lLC MROU ww. ~° ~i`'~b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAILON(~A }~ ~~ COUNTY OF 8AN BIPRNARDIIdO n e' ':~~.~~ ~' E~ a STATE OF CAY.II+'ORNIA ~ T Iv ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 4'3 ASSES8MENT DlApgq~q STREET LIONTINO IMAINTgNANCt ~DIpTtItCT NO, 6 ,; ~. ~.,. o,_~,, ~ i r f ~ ~ ~ lE A •.~,J' ::: . l g°~~"~ C1TY 0~ 3Ad1C80 CZTCAI[OtWA ,., I ~•~~~ r ~ ~~ I QiAN TB~K~ II'10 +~ ~ ~ ASSESSMENT . 0IAi3RAM ' ' :ET LIGHTING MAINTRNANC< Oli'~ICT NO. (cr '.> AtrPlXAT10N NO. /6 ,: -_ ~1 ~~ 11 1 1 1 a.~, 1 A ~1 •~F. ~ ~~ s~~ ~^ C~ a~ >~AZICS~ vY`~Ai~V1~A .i, , :,~~~5 OOUIPPY or MN a~Itt+A>ROn+o.l ~^ _: ~' ~ areTS ar cAiv~o>RxaA ,~. V. I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 gNNEXATION NO. 17 ~ ~~~ ~ ~~`~~ ;' CITY OP RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA ,,~ -;;,~.,~c COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDWO ': ;= 8TAT1; OP CAI.IIrORNL\ ~.~- 1~T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (~ ANNEXATION NO. 17 i ~~~ .P;~ ; crrsr or xarrcxo cviceuorla~ ~~ ,_ cocnv~r og err >~sx~annvo ~::~~ -~ _ ~~T~ of ~,~.~~,- ~. N ,~, ASSESSMENT DIAd3RAM STREET LIQNTING MAINTENANQE DISTRICT NO. (o ANNEXATION NO. 18 1! 1' ~~ ~ ~~ ~.~:~ Y. crnr or sANaso c~cru~oKVS .~``~~ oovNnr or a~x raxwsa~o `` y bTATi Or CALQOSMA ~: ~ ~ N -~- I ~I ~, <I a~ <~ ~I W ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGNTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Np, (o ANNEXATION N0. 18 i I ~-__ =--_-= o~ - i !~ ~' I i i ~' ~ -- --- ---- I" I - .._ -~----------V~ 1 ~ ~~1°' 1l1i1 3 W ~' W :. ~ I ~~ W W ~ ~ ~: ii OI I ~ ~~ ~ I~ ` 1 ~ D t' ~ i I I ~ I W / ' Q ~~~ n ~ ~ a' rI~ =r i i __ '~ ~ ~~ r >~~~~ ,. __ 5.~_,~ -` N ~~ ~a CP!"! 0~ 1tANCHO OVCM[ONaA OOUNTY OI SAAI 8S$NAftDQI~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DIaTRICT NO.ln ANNEXATION NO. 18 W t 5+; t N ' L t ~ ., ~ p r. S 4 s,. .~...... Sf. 1. E W n ~~0~ y~i~ Y. CITY O)f RANCHO CUCA1[ONGA ~ QM (tjl j~,}1q 41 :. _,. • COUNTY 0>t dAN R~NA7tDQt0 * ' .'"~~ `3 BTAT)i 0)- CAL~ORNIA :. ~ ~ N --;~._. _ ASSSSSfV1ENT DIAGPAM LANDSCh~E MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND S i:YY..'7EfP .rau- ~LL~. 4Yrr •11 V ~L ~~~ ,ci~w CTTY 0~ RANCHO CZICAILONGA A s~ _.~ 1' COLTN'PY Ol AAN HZRNARAINO /j\` ::~"6~~''`~ 8TA'PE 01 CALIIr08NIA ~~ "_~"_' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 sirE ~ _s ,- '~ . ~* ~=°°: ~ ~ --~ ~ ..qr A ~ ~~ 1 M1 ' '-~ I a ~ ^~ ~ ~ I r ~ ~~~ r ~p 6~ I! 1 » ~ 'i\ ~y i (~1 i ii ~ y _ r I ~ J~,~j! .w... ~ . ~.. ~ • `4 I i ~ `t ~ .,..... w / '~ i ~ .......,......,, ~~ .M1 1 I i ~ ~_ i I i Iw N `~1 ~ Tim _ j ~y~ a\~_tf'~ j~~ .J .. 0 1 r .~ Imo, It i !i I ti (( ~i , ... fI 'I .+ . ., V : ~; ' r ~~~ L-.-____„ ~" 3b ~ s.?S~w.,: I ~ .'"! 01 EAlIC$O CtJCA1LOKaA .. ~ '1 ~. /v. •.ill h PSSESSMENT C11AC 'AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO ~~ L F00 Mr.~ .l0.YFY-'0 ~. _ ,( CU~1~_ ~.,~ ; l ~k.~ µc.r° i t ~~a ~ ;ss- riygh r ..w~~~,~ ~w ~a .or .a ~o~ I ro. ~a gat i ~o~ © O 'J G ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ A 'J -T N~w~rur ---.. _..._.. - ~„errr z ~ --~- - 1 ~ OO sr ~ s• ~ - : ~ n i ~~ „~ ; ~~ 1 n ~ ~ 3a~ s,.a~~w ' Cl'TT 01 EA?(CSO CrJCAYONdA ~~,.5 COUi~T!' Of dAri H~1AEDtNO BTATi Of CALiiO~NU r 7 .; ~ r~_ ~ 1 ~- f' / r ~ f- 04SESSMENY OIAG AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET IIGNTIN[i MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 ~..s.~ - ®~.._ ~ ~~I i -~ ~~~ \5 ~ =~ I /~ --~, ---, ~ :r r - .,....., ~fa~r~~ ~~ e+aa>>> f~dl il~ `_~ _ SI~~I~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~D8 A ~M .~ St y. ~~ =~,- Cd1"Y 0~ EANCHO CGCAi[OltQA covrrri o~ sir aai+,waixo ~ ___~ ~~ s~ cx~~.n ;~ - - ~ ,,.., ~ 7f ~ ~ ~ - -'~- =~_ -_~ ~_ _.r ~ ~ - ~ ~.. . ;.~. N ~,1~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~-r 4SSESSMENT ~ LANDSCAPE MgINTE!IANCE'DISTRICT NO, 3 STgEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND e -._` -_. . ~-- -~-_~---- I I -~- ..._- ~~ ~~; ~ ~, ~` ~ ~t _~ _ ,_ - -- ,rte, << ~~ 1 I~~'~'""*~ -- i -- ~ - `~ _- ,.~ , ,~.,, ~~--- -- - 4 , ~ -~---- --~- ~--~ ------.~,~_~ I ~ _ -__ ~ I -. ._, r.___---- J 1 _~- ~j0 ~~'~~~''_ C3TT 0~ L1NC8p CpCAI[OtKiA -- ' ~f ~ X~ ~ /J, t t+ ASSESSMENT CfAGRAM LAND5CAAE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND e ~ ; > STRL'E7 6 /~ S TREE r ~~ ~- _~ 4 ~ i i ~ ~ I i i I i ~ _-.y ~~..j._us' ~ R ~ W w W 1 1 ~~ 11 FuruRE ~J/GOING ~ .~/ a s'~0~~". \' ~~ 6 y~~ ~ C37? 0>I 1<AL(C80 CtTCA~LOI~GA OOIINI'>t OI (11111 D1RZ/11ED~i0 rT __ hi A.sSESSMENT DIAGl~AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 6 Avow I ;~ i ~! ~i AT & Sr RR p m y uj ¢i =~ 5.h I 4TH ! QQQ(~ -,G~w~ i j i I ~ 3il 5.~~~^ ~ o>r sAxcao COCAYOras `, .. ~ oouxr~r os ~Ax »uon+o 5 3 >ZTA17 O>r CALQ~OSNL ? T V~ i ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 -- q-rauTM Std rrrr!l111~ II -. , . i n~ ., ;~i( ----~----- ~'IF ,~ ';j ~ I •-------,:I ~ i l ~ a - _ v ~~ -~- I~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 1 I Ma- ih L~aJJJ, ~`V.`~.1 VIII' I ~~ ~ ; ~ ;,~~. Y it ~~ '~ j ~ r~.rryr \ i~ M a . D - U ~~ i , y . IUI I! w a e ,t ~-~~ r ~- ~ ~ y ~ i ~ ~ ~ I ~, ; ~~ ji r4 -~ -----~-~'._~ ~ 1 1, ~, s-a.r rro a-r 1~ r ,lil, ~d-...._-.~_,_._.~~. -•- ----- i~ n ;~ ~Ii~I'~ ~~~~~ ~~a QYOJec ~" 5+r~,. 4 AssM~NT OIAt3RAM ~~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 61STRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 AVE. 3/3 y.~%~Dt ~^ C~ 0>/ ~ANCSA CITCA1i0NaA i ~ ~vuinit,L p~v0. // ASSE~SS~M~NT DI! iRA11A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6 Poc Nonh Cucamongo MB. 13/ID ve••~•+ Te+E is vC_ I 'k~ ~' a~ ,~. ti. „~~ 3t~ ..~;`. ~f ''. ~~~ _. _ CiT! Of EANC80 CiTCAYONGA COIJHTY 01 lIAN BQJ"IA~DII~O argT: o>r c~a~o»ex~- N 13SESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 5/TE 3/ S S;~%., cnR or ~uxcso cvcwwoxas ._,, • ' = oocn~rr or e~x ~sxw~uro ~' ' ~ srsTS or ca~o» T ~~~ ~ ~. xis obit h " 13SESSMENT DIA _RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 i r-~--~~ /~ i i~l ~I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~, -~-~ i . I ~.~- ~ ~ I I ~~_ - ~ ~ ~, ~ ~,~ ~.. L ~I ~~ r ~ ~I 1 tl ' i ~ ~ ~ ~-- - - ---r -' ~ 3/~ ~i~ Y C1T! 01 EIIMCHO CtJCA1[ONGA w QR Sl7- / s, _ ,_ OOVPI'1? 01 MN H1i1RNA1tDIIQ0 ~` ` ~ r'~fA17 0)I CALUO)!<IiG T -- 1SSESSMENT DIAdRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~ ,loothl! blvd. ~ (~ m e ~ Y E SI`.8 location /o1S5 ~/.t~NettZ'. arrow mutt /QGrG~. 9/730 ~ ° ~, i~ ii I .p i/ 3/ 7 ~ ,ai`~:, CITT 0>/ RANCHO CUCA1[ONQA ~ ~ n~ s$. ~~ _, • ~"* OOtJNTY OI JlAI~i B>LEIiA]tDtNO '- `~ ~ 8TA't7 OI CALU'08NIA :~ ~" ~ ~ r y -r,ni3LS '~~ , ~ANDSCgssESSMENT STREET IIGNTING MAINTENANCE O'D1SrR CM NO 3 'ST R~cT NHS' ~ AN° 6 J i i w _ ',~ A p I .. ~.~ ~\`' I.. d ~ti _~,'f ... a ,,, ~:~ + '`/~qa ./V, .arc ~I i ~ ©~ I •--, ",VIM ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~, ~ $ o~7'x o' \~ 0° ~ o~ ~°~~roxoe 7 Y •• I 1• 1yI11I f 5) I ~ I i ~__~,~ ~T ' I ~'1 I M ~r 0 7 ~I ~~ r- ~H I.~i~ r LYE ~~-~~ x!~ ~ bi " ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS 3 1 AND 6 SITE :il' `i. ~;- '-' ~~~ i _ '~ •4 ~~l ~ ~/ 9 pi~w CT.!"`,' ~~ awliC80 CCCAYONQA jl$,$$;~ . . }~. -,• Y - OOtTIi'P4 OI MN Diit?fAEDQ10 5 ASSESSMENT LANDSCAPE M GRAM AINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 'rF ~U ~ v~~t'. ~' ~~ ~t~1NCR~ ~.a~.~ifiWQ~nN ,\ p-~3RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ..SB~SSMENT DIA.3RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS 3 t AND 8 S?! MI dA1- Yii4iQ,f rv/(r~ fMi 4vd+i M+ +WA~. 3~a . p~~Y , crri o~ L-rcao cvcwroraA I L~~ ASSESgME~T D~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE'Dt® gAjCIIT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 6 a a 3a 3 ~`~" ,• = ,..~ ~ crr~r o~ ~-xceo cvc~oxae xhi i '` ASSESS NT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ,~ ,l O K ~~ ?<iT 'T9i[ TYH L[O[MD C:viC C[Ni FN OR. vRUNUf CAR•fli M 1 0 • . fTRCLT 116HT ® fTR[[T TR[[ ,~ '~.w C1TT O! EArICBO CTJCA1i01i0/0 Lor T ~~ ; ~" COUNT? 0! tlAN BSIlNA3DQ(0 ~ TR ia- '~ ~.~- a I RESOLUTION N0. ~ 9- dl7 V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO lEW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, AND 6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 7989/90 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO Tha City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: SECTION 1 : That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 for the fiscal year 1989/90 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated to common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway ,.ti1c ,.r ,. ..., - ---- - - - ... . .... .................. ..~.u..~u, u,u „yu ri) „b,,,C01 OIIU IIIVIH particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's~Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. t, 2, 3. 4, 5, and 6". SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said Cily Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the Cily of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that cert?in "Map et Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance DL^tric; ".,,. 3" r'ap 0' .°,li wi L'yhiing Maii,ieiiarlce Diairici iJo. a , 'Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", and "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the CiP~ Clerk of said City. 3aS CfiY COUNCIL RESq_UTION SLMD 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 May 17, 1989 Page 2 Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more panicular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. 89~_ has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title 'Annual Engineer's Repon" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all padiculars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 21st day of June, 1989, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and straw cause why said work should not be done or c arded out or why assessments snould not be levied and collectetl for fiscal year 1989/90. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be dsSvered to the City Clerk of said Ciry prior to the time set for uie neanny, anu iW omen pmresis or oolaawns wm oe wnsioereo. a me signer or any prorest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contain or be acwmpanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 6: HII the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 7: Published notice shall bo made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mavor shall sicn this Resolution and the CiN Cierk shall attest to the same. and the City Clerk Shall Cause the lama to be pubhshetl 10 tlay5 before the tlale set for Me hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a nowspapor of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and ciroulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 3a~ -- - ------ CIT}' OF RANCHO CI'C'~Ab10NGA .: ;- STAFF REPORT '> DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager i FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager ', SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY' ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ~ SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 21, 1989 TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE FINAL ~~I ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ~~ DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5 AND 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolutions giving preliminary approval of City Engineer's Reports, declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 9, 5 and 6 for Fiscal Year 1989/90 and oEf Bring a time and place for a Public Hearing. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND: A preliminary Engineer's Report reviewing the current years activities, expenditures to date and projected expenditures fnr x^icral Voar i9a0/9n M1ac hacn cA fnr canh TaMcrar~n Maintenance District. This report^is required pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of !972. Each district's assessment rate for previous years and as proposed for Fiscal Year 1989/90 is cutiined on the attached Exhibit. Ripe ~!CUily subwitted, ~~.,., lf~:~, ~erry 9. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JsF:de Attachments 327 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LMD 1-6 May 17, 1989 Page 2 Landscape Maintenance District i (Gen Cityl Landscape Maintenance District 2 (Victoria! Landscape Maintenance District 3A (Hyssopi Landscape Mai r.tenance District 3B (Medians) Landscape Maintenance District 4 (Terra Vista) Landscape Maintenance District 5 ITOt Lotl L,a ndscaoe Maintenance District 6 (Carynl EXHIBIT BS/88 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 38.00 28.00 25.50 25.00 25.00 223.77 2?3.77 195.00 195.00 195,00 -0- 258.75 258.75 258.75 258.75 -0- --0- -0- 45.00/ 165.00/ acre acre 154.10 128,34 105.00 105.00 105.00 163.04 173.41 111.00 105.00 105.00 -0- -0- 195.00 195.00 195.00 ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 8 ~- ~ a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF Cf7Y ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAMTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, S, AND 6 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanronga that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs o! the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District Nos. t, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, and 6. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Cledc of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every pad thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report; nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as ioliows: ,. Thai ri,e uryn,cm~s winuaic ~i iim u;ce~ wai any cnpmww ~i aeiu avin and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That fhe diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion fo the estimated beneft to be received uy said suiniivisiun, respeciiveiy, irurn said work and ci iire incideniei expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the Ciry Engineer's Annual Rapon for the fiscal year 1989/90 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. ~9 cmcaxaciLRPSaunor4 LMD 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5 and 6 May 17, 1989 Page 2 AMIUALASSESSMENT RATFS Landscape District #1 (General City) $ 38.00 $ 28.00 $ 25.50 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Landscape District #2 (Victoria) 223.77 223.77 195.00 195.00 595.00 Landscape District #3A (Hyssop) -0- 258.75 258.75 258.75 258.75 Landscape District #3B (Medians) -0~ -0- -0- 45.00 165.60 Landscape District #4 (Tatra Visia) 154.10 128.34 105.00 105.00 105.00 Landscape District #5 (101 LOI) 103.04 IIJ.41 III.UU IUJ.UU 111J.UV landscape District #6 (Caryn) -0~ -0~ 195.00 195.00 195.00 33~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITI~ FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RA.'v'CHO CUCAMONGA SUIIM]'I'I'F.D 3Y: ASSESSMENT RF,VF.NUE ADMINISTRATION APPHOVP;D: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (General City Farkways 6 Equestrian Trailsl Fiscal Year 19dS; 90 The I9d9/30 annual report fer landscape Maintenance District Nn. I ;General f it-v! is nranarad in rmm~lianrn with fho renni ramenta of Article d. C'ha of er 1, Divisicn 5 of the Streets and Hig.*.ways Code, State of California ;Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. Prcjected operat inns and mainteca nce cents far Fiscal Years I9d8/99 and 13B 9i 9B are provided in this report. Frejec ted costs are used to estacl ish the necessary assessment rate to furnish the nigh est quality landscaping at the lowest pcssable assessment rate. Assessments are used to furnish services and materials for maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and equestrian trails within the district, The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. I is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance of parkways and equestrian trails include repair of irrigation systems: removal or replacement of all or part of landscaping irt~provements. The maintenance also includes providing for the life, growth, health and beauty cE the land sc ap: ng. 'Pr ammo ng, nor a}'i ng, Lert u:zing antl; cr treating for disease or injury as well as removal of trimmings, rubbish or debris are part of the ongoing maintenance. Walls immediately adjacent to parkways are Capital improvements within La,n dscape Maintenance Distract No. I were constricted by the developers of tSe and iv id~aal subdivi slops. The plans and improvements are as stipulated ui the conditions of approval for each d eve lcpment and as apprcved by the Engineering Divisicn. e fiscal Year 19d8i89 P.eview General City Completion cf tire Archibald Entry Monurcents Was accomplished ducting 198tl/99, An additional $4,000 was budgeted for the Contingency Tree 3eplacem.ent P.c count br iaginq the total artount available to $S,OOJ. Mo istnre senscrs were installed in various park~aays to conserve water. Additional `ands will be badgeced in Euture years to allow mare moisture sensor installations. As cf Prcjected BB/d9 Budget J3 3i/89 fi/30/89 Assort. Admin. 29,516.JJ 29,515.00 29,516.00 M.a int./Goer. 2, JJ0.00 2,429.47 3,544,'6 Ve'n. Kaint./Gp er. 6,456.00 -7- 5,466.00 "Canttg.iTrees 4,OJO.OC -0- 43,JJJ.OJ Ccntra r,t Serv. 39,392.00 51,877.48 47,620,00 ""Tree Ma int.iContract Adm. 16,425.00 -0- 16,425.00 Capital Expend. 20,000.00 -J- 20,000.00 Water 35,J00.00 10,139.00 21,116,00 Electric .S,J00.00 2,920.25 4,392.00 2ntry Mcnarcients -0- _ 45,427.35 45,421.35"'~ 157,799.00 122,909.63 2J4,8J0.57 "The ccntingency acccuat for trees was established by City Counc it to cravide funds for tree xepiacen•.ents cegair ed due tc a major sLOrm Cx disaster. Currently there is $5,000 ($1000 from 87/88 and $4,000 frort 89/391 in this r. eser ve account. Additional funds is the amount of 517,000 D~~r inq t9e current fiscal year the fcllowing tracts :diagrams attached` were d:,n BS ed t., _d ndSCdpe Ma lntendnCe U15tx1ct I4o. 1. _andscace Distract '. - Annexat.; ohs For 1309-9J AIJNEX 43 DE 97-11 5 ASST. UNITS P.tUJEX v4 T3ACT ~26'i0 67 S.r'. PtJNEX 45 - - iii ANNcX E6 TRACT 13475 37 c,p, TRACT 12902 29 S.?. ANNEX 47 TRACT 13644 24 S.'r. ANNEX 49 TRACT 12650 35 S.F. TRACT 12650-4 36 S.°. TRACT 13715 S.?. TRACT 13597 47 S..'•. TRACT 13742 17 g,F. ANNEX 49 TRACT 13318 15 S.F. ATJNEXED 6CTOEE.: 5, 1999 TRACT 12659-1 138 S.F. TRACT 8805 99 TRACT 4805 122 TRACT 8369 191 TRACT 8583 9 ANNEXED OCTOEER 19, 1999 TRACT 13728 34 S.F. ANNEXED NGUEMBER 2, 1988 TRACT 73650 71 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMHE3 16, 1949 PM 10783 23 ASST. UNITS TRACT 73367 19 S.F. DECEkHER 7, 1999 TRACT 13642 19 S.F. DECEMEER 21, 1989 TRACT' 13542-2 30 S.r. JFNUF.RY 4. 1999 TRACT 13053 74 S.?. TP.ACT 12332-2 151 S.?. AIJJJEXEC e"EERUARY 1 , 1999 TP.ACT 12895 9 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED APRL 5, 1989 TRACT 11600-I rl S.r. i TRACT 13927 5 S.E. TEACT 13542-3 2C S.F. in T- __ i iSni - - ni Fiscal Year 1989/90 The installation of water sensors proved to be of benefit in reducing water consumption. Monies are again budgeted for additional sensor installations. The tree inventory and computer monitoring program will continue to provide necessary information for a complete tree maintenance program. Tree trimming, health of tree, etc., will be monitored to provide a comprehensive management program for street trees. Expenditure History Landscape Maintenance Oistrict No. 1 General City Proj. Budget 87/88 88/89 89/90 Assort. Admin. 21,536.00 29,516.00 36,172 Overhead -0- -0- 1,130 Payroll 2,223.73 -0- -0- Pringe Ben. 778.31 -0- -0- Maint./Oper. 1,875.92 3,644.00 15,000 Veh, Maint. -0- 6,466.00 8,500 Contract Serv 31,510.46 47,020.00 90,000 Cap. Expend. -0- 20,000.00 15,000 Water 18,310.99 21,116.00 17,000 Irreg. Res. ]0_0~..~ 707:.... 30_0- "Entry Monum. 99,261.29 45,421.35 120,000 Cant Adm/Tree Ma int. -0- 16,425.00 17,000 Contingency -0- -0- 5,000 Trail Maint. -0- -0- 12,000 178,929.93 194,800.35 339,802 Projected Carryover $229,000 6 Months Funding (709,000) Entry Monuments " (120,000) -0- Revenue Required Mess entry rz~anumentsl $119,802 Prol ected P.s sessm.enr Re r, nip+,s 226:075 Possible 89/90 Carryover 6,273 The 1989/90 proposed budget indicates several sizable increases. The first area is the category for Maintenance and Operations. This account is used Eor the purchase of materials used either to maintain or replace existing parkways. Trees, shrubs, groundcover as well as other necessary itame to Lmp[ove the appearance of district parkways will be paid far from this account. The other major increase is for contract maintenance, This is due in part to additional areas to be maintained as well as the increase in the contractors charges. It is estimated there will be 9013 assessment units within this district in fiscal year 1989/90. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover funds ($229,0001 and projected costs, the assessment rate will continue at $25.00/unit. Assessment receipts Eor any fiscal year are not realixed until after December 10 and the estimated carryover funds will De used for funding the district Eor 6 months and additional entry monument construction (Capital only; no Operations and Maintenancel. 1989/90 Assessments 9013 Assessment Units x $25.00 = $226,075 Q'TY OF RANQ40 Cl/Cs1MONGA lr MMThnra~ psh/oT Na T - NwwiMnt HW~ MMrMAr~wH ~/ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 -- ANNEXATION N0. 43 Srae Hwr _ i ..I - ~~ - _ .~. r ~ i' `= Y ~ =~~~.`=~ _ ... ~~ ~~~=h~1 I ~, l; ~ 33~ ,~,:/'uR' CITY Of RANCHO Cl,'CA,~IONGA w ~~ I \^ / :•w-'• `~ ENGINEERING DIVISION w T =~ ~~ VICINITY ~tAP l~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM -- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1. ANNEXATION N0. ~ 'N. I I I I I ~~~~~~i~~~~~~~1, i.l'1' ~iw i~ ~. . i I ~I. I _ I~ I 1. ,I GIIOUNOCOYGI P1,) I Te CCl l~al ICGCNO NCfT 27.000 '~, ~0 l[~i.wiM awl Gnw~aww TMIi ]7 ]0~ l7e. ML1 • StrouliaM 339 i ~ ~. '. .~ , f! : ;> ir. _ ~~ "s '`4~" _ ~ = CITE' OF RA`CHO Cl,'C~.~IONGA EVC;INEERING DIVISION ~'IrIVITY ~I~P n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM -- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..~ 4NNE?fATICN N0. 44 ~i n~ n ~~ l tl L i T ~ i e~ fi `~ ~i ~~ 1~ I ~~nn~~Wdb aV oY>d ~'rM I/IO. I ~ NII ~G N / /f!J ?.vis> s.ii Y ....• _ n.. ~...... y 1 ` `~(n a .e. i ~s3',~ 9 ~ ~~'l/ .s '~ "~~~ i i o ~'i ~~ = ~ . L il~T\Int^ ~ ~~ ~- CITY OF R.~\CHO Cl'CA,~IOI~;CA a'~ ~~:. _ ~~` ? E\GI\EERI\'G D11'ISIOV ~- ~ 'ICI\ITY .V,~P ~T :.- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OIS7RICT N0. j - 4NNEXATION_ NQ, 45 i 6 x r t 9 O 9 ' ~ ~~ f \\ ,~_ ~ . s.. ~'~~~"~. CITY OF R,~tiCHO CL'C,~.~fOIVGA ~~ E~GI~fEERI;~G DIVISION „~ ~~IC'IVITV ..I.aP ~~ N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. S ANNEXATION N0. 96 w ! I ~ d _ GRIM! ~ rl y ~ n Y 1 N I f r A " '~. ii ~ ~ 1 " r I p • r • II ~ I W ~C ~ V 1 M r 1 I 1 S I b p A\ r t I > ~i~iZl ~ I l ~ I ~ ~ I voarti~.. a u~. 3 ~/~ ~, - ``"~'~ ~ CITY OF RA`CHO CL'G,~IOPiGA _` ~';~ ~ ~~y EVGINErRING DIVISION/ ~T r VICINITY tiIAP ~ln j. ~l .m ~ ASSESSMEM' DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 __ ANNEXATION N0. Ra ' ,II ~: ~~ •r _ ~r . ' ~ ~ i .! S1 \ 1 ai I r ~_' , H ~ ~ I Q ~ • 2! ¢ ~ ~ I~ r ~ ,,.:,.~ ~" ~ u ~•:~ ~ I T"T :~ .~. ..,.+.... ~ I, t- :1 ao i~ I ~ - .. ~• ~r J ~~ L..( ~ ~e+rnsr---~ ~~ ~` 17 ~` I~ ~~ I 4 ~•• wn ~N ~ - 1, _ i] I I --~_ la ~ ) T i f ~I i0 II I I i ~ '~, r 1 _-gyp•r• i i i '~, i i ~. } ~ I i~ ~ ~ Ll~1Wa lryp J~C~~/ , CITY OF RAtiCHO C( 'CA `IOr y,~ , . , `~ ~ ~ EVGINEHRING DIVISION I;tnC VICINITY N1~P ~~ n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ ' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE QI3T111CT N0. ,;, ANNEXATION N0.47 T ~ :se==~ ~ i r, ~ ~ ~ '~ Y. ~ J ;j~ ~ I Y r -~ ~ i.... ' ' ~ I ~ ~ I C ~ ~ ~ ~yt w~1 i a ~ ~ J ~a ~~ I~ ' - ' .y., •- ~- _ y ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ n n v i " u. 1 s"'w~ 3u~ CITY OF RANCHO Ct,'CA,~I( Y~ ,~ , >; s EY(;IYEERINO DIVISION - `;,t~-~ VICIVITy ~tAP -~ ~__r.~ .~ ~_~_ i-__ _ . ;~~xl 1 ' \~~__- ~: ~__ ~1,~; _:' i s~ ~T I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MgINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 1 ANNEXATION NO qs ~~``-`mow ~.~~ S .~ ~.\ -^ cirv of RA~vctio ~.'G,~ E EVC;IV"RING DIVISIpN ~_; ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANCSLAPE MAINTENANCE DISTgICT N0.1 ANNE><A710N N0. 4B i i c 1 I t, ~ , ~ ~ 9 i~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ~• -. 1 ze 13a t ~t 132 ~~ Zz ~ p4 I z5 ~ 26 l gl 26 ~ 33 ~~ ~. 111 \ ~a t0 i 20 i9 i ,a} t 1 6 t5 35 22~2t I 13 9 ~ t0 ~t2 t ~ ~ / ~, ~~ 3 ~ ~ 5 ~a ~ ~ n~:ix eoao ~~ ~ U~ ~'~'^ ~{TY Of RANCHO Cl,'C~+-,~fOhJ('A ^ > ~ _ f'', t ='~i ~ ~ i EVCIVE~ DIVISif A ASSESSMENT DIAuRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..I. Al:NE%ATION N0. 40 I i i 1 ~` 2B ~ 29 i i~ ~ ` I2g 26 2 12a ~ 30 II w 9 20 2 I ti, 22 ~ 23 j- ~ ~ ~' S, 5 ij i 0 ` 9 32 I , ~ 15 io ~3~~ ~2~ ~` 1 4 ~ 16 _" ~` w I ~~ V ` ~ SQ ~ 5. ~ ~. ~ 33 1 I 3 3 ~~ ~ ~} " , 4 la ~-~` 5 2 " 35 !!W to 1 ~h ~ ~1.\ 1` C MILl51 DE ROAD 3u~ `~`~4 CITY OF R,efVCNO Cl,'CrL\IOI~iGA w .~ ~ "s •'- " „ ~'' f "= ~' x EVGLVEERING DI\'1510N ~ T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTNlCT Ntl Z ANNEXATION N0. qB I ~ 2 is z d a ~ 1 3 tt~RN9 . ,. ~~ ~~~ S WIf1~r1M ~ ~~k! ~www ~ UG ~~c„,~ y?i~ ''•', y CITY OF R,~NCHO CIJC:A,~IONCA _~~ = EVGIVEERItiG dl1'ISION ~ . _~. -- ASSESSMENT DfAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 4A - - ' --- ~ ;4 t , , a ~ rr ,_ 'W ... i ~ . .~ ~ .I r~~' 1'~,q lJ. a i ~ i ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ • / • ~ ~ I 1. ~ U~` _r... 6 K, :f ~~ : . ~I ,r~I. .ywR s~,y I ' ~1~ ,i I. V,7 ~~ l ~. '. •.. wlA' T 1 • ~ ' ~ ' ~ '~ ,. I ~ ~~ ~ ,rte ~ .: ~ ~ ° .:p .~ w i ~ i ~ ~ I ~ 'k ~ ~ ,- ~~ ~ L,V ~?%~~~`•' CITY OF RANCkiO C[.'G,~10lYGA w y~~~, ~ \ ~" J ~~' ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION > VICINITY '~1~P ? 1 im ~ ASSESSMENT DI' SRAM LANDaCAPE MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. 1 STREET LIONTINQ MAINTENANCE 018TRICT N08. 1 AND 2 ~I T ii ,~ I~ ~I ;J _. l ,,,~. ~ XI ~j~~ ~~ ' _ T ' ~.~~~ ~~ ~5 ~ ~ L it ~, ~, II C.IyiT•t'~01/ =AN~C~8y0 CIIOAJIOI~WpA WVi~Ai Q~ WY1 ~~'iidV ASS~S8M~NT DIO ';FIAM LANDS..APE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIONTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2 ~ ~.. y0 ~~ 1 ~~ _ ~ ~ =_~~ Ys.,.ti Crrx o~ ~urtcso c~cA>~toxan oourrri or eex a>ax~a~o ~reTa or cwraro,lrean N A~3E8$MENT ®IACiRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIG6ITING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 Ewa ~TM1~~ _ ~ ,1 -- -- r-- ~~i ~~r --= ; ~ ~S \ ---~ ~~1~ 1 Y Y 1 ~_~ I III~NIM r1~~~ ~`~~ ~~~~~ r~ vw.~~v - o?rv~-, ~ ~~ 1. -~ `_, r i% ~_ r~ ~e~_~ 1 '.n un~: -, ~~' III II WI'yH~~`~u ~y~ M 11 JJ NJNJ --~~ • 4 ~:1 _;1-+ Imo--' . ,--"rs-r- ~~ ~I ~~~~ '' ~ ~~ o i~n ~uM~N'~u~nJm i' .q 1 __~ •TONY MILL DI111/~ ~_ - -- "`- ~---: a _, ^J .: i i~ 3, 3 ,y~'~D Y CTP! 0>I aANC80 CnCM[OIN~A ~._:=~+'b ~ COVNIT 0)t ~11N B1aNA1tDII?O i ASS ~SSMI~NT IAGR~aM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 -'- - - s' N~ '{F9, ~! _ _~"+e ;. `' spa. a Iklf I~~~ 11 `~ ~~: .n gr ~' 351 ~~ .~.i~n S..o~;, cr>7t of xAxcBO cvcA1lQxas ,~~„~~~ WUNP! 03' IwAx 8>iSxA>RDQ1a ~: ~"~'' al'A'PS Q' CALIIIO)I;xIA ~' ~. t ':~ i ~ ?e ;s :' ~oACEL 2 ~e~~. ~~ :t ~v~r-r I, - - ~- ~^-~ ! r ~ _ PM 11~7~1~ ASSESSMENT DIA~;RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ~`' r----- - - I~ I j~ i~i ~ ~, ~ ~ t 1 AND 2 BROKEN STAR --. ~ GDURY i ~ - _ _ i ~'I r~wD R.Cti. ~~ I I t+ ~r HIGNLJ4JD^ NvtNU` -~! iQ', ~~ %~`~ crrY o>r a~xcao coc~woxa~ w ,~ ;;,~~~ _ COVlV'i'g Op 811x BAlxA8DIId0 A \ :: ~' a El'A'I'E 01/ CAL,IIIog~ N ~ Xi7 /bit "/-I' ASSESSMENT DIAQRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ,.,..:;.«.r. 4- ./~ I.Y ~i~ rr neAru'~r~sa ~,m _er . ~ i ` +. = E nni ~~~ AcAaurr aA.i 3 :0'f 2 ~ ! lllMP ,.~. -~ f ~ i ~; a / I " ~, / . ~ ~' !1 ~ ? M ~ { Rtf' t I/ I~~~w~i Y ~i ~~~ ~ ` y~t~~ ~t 7' ~°rl~ I DI/i'.C~ ~ "r/A', E L ER PN 71EY ~ ~~ ~ r ~ + ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ri~ ¢I 1,~ ~. n ~I ~ I MALI' ~ !, .N a+ir ~ ~• ~"_, ~.~ j~ { , ~ ~ ... iL ifl S. ~ 1 ~~__~ 1 ~ ~ i ~ I Eve w~ ' \ sr ,w ~ + ,1f 1= • • Z~ ' v MY ~ u ~ ~ a~arr ~«b~~ ~.ara . ~ ~ A~; uuca ~ ~ . L i ~ias'~"~. + --,-~ - 1 __ ~~ ~~~ ~;'~ ; CY'P! OI EANC80 CQCA1[ONGA ~''~ r i RpIT! A>A r •. _.. °~SSESSM~NT DIA RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 I I =_- ~ 1 ~- ----- ~ - -~~~~~~~--~ ,,.,., .-,_r,, __rG100E ~T'~s"i_ ~ y~,.p_~~. ~_~ .. ._ ~pr_-~y W ' ~ C /; ' a i-~-I--i-~- ~'] W .i. ~ ~~-{~ Ci ~~-_I-I-~I '_`''_ .- - -f-I-i,i ~_~, ~_ s ------_ 7-=-- ;rj rrtn.~ucxs~,.~a`:: went "mow 'rlr,/f1 '!- i~ \\' ' `: ~ i ~. --~ .~s ? ~~_ cn~r o' aerrcao cna+noxae COUNTY of r1Ax BQx,+aH~o ~ srATS or cararoaxu ASSESSMENT DI..GRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LiGHTlNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 , ~.~~.,~....,.. ~i .:r:_• ~^f ~ _ _ L rt- _ ~ _ ___ - ~~~ _ -~ ~ ~ ` :~ ~ S3G14f. ~ ~ ~ ~. II i~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ s ~ ~ Fa'n. •~ -- / ~ i ' . ' ~ ~ ~ i.R1i. ~ ~ . ~.~ .i ~ ~ I i i 3 •' „ ~ `' ' I..w' ~~+~ 15 aaa~rar ~ ~-- 03 'r) / ~a n I-- ..: - ~~ ~~ v. '~ SII( ~. ~ rs ~r 9 i~ ~-/ ~ .~ 3~~ a;~-c~r~~~r/o~>r s,-ar~c~>~yo~c~no/As~~o~a~- w ~'~ i W V i~ i i o~ W~6~ YM{~My~o are~rs or cw~ou~rL- e N ~-- ASS~E~SMEPf7 DIhGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGFITING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NDS. 1 AND 2 m ,.... .,.., ---- ~ --------- -~ i ~W~.. 'wawi__________. ~~ 3s~ Ai~~, CTPT A~ ~ANCBG ~CA1[OII~A y/ _ ~ ,_ aOVIi'i? OI MN DQNA~DIl119 • ~_ ,~~ srA~P, ~~ CALU~OtNIA - N C hr%; fj/f A' iESSMENT DIAGf. M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 .-- ,y i ~~ 1~~ (r ~r'.~.r.~.I. '~ ~.r'~-~ ~_ ~~ABRipt "DaiUe= .~... ~...... -. J G~N~iKO c«,Rr MoR.uS Ca,aT iCUt Co4RT f~CGi~ Cou¢~' y~~~ ~,a •~. -°~.~ l -'~ c SUNNYG~t+J CouRS' _=L /Paweagc~cY Gouar ~~ ~ ~~ Cl°M Ot EANCSO CVCA~tQl/4A ~ _„_____ COV?1'PT OD dAN BO.t1A~D1N0 ~~- a'1'A17 Of CALUOtNiA ~ p T `!! ~,ch~b't H" ASSESSPAEt~iT QIA®RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 3~0 v~~w CITT 01 EANC8O CiJCA1[ONOA y` ~" COUNR OI aAl~l DERNAEDII~1O . ~/~~ '; -=~Q ~ arArs o~ cA~ro~xiA ~ T f ASSESSAA~N ®IAORAM I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NA. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 -=, - -., ~ ','.' . I '~~-~ --" s~~ 1 ~~+ ~- =il~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~I i ~ .~ ~F .~ ~ ~.~~ '~ w~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~~ ~~ - ~~ ~ '~ ~~ q~ ~I ~ . ~~~~ :~U 1 6 ~~ ! j PI ~ h NIa6ND A t H / /Y' ~~ ~: crrlr os sAKCSO CCQASLAIWA ~~Y aotrrrrt a sAK sastASan+o =' ~ 8TA'P!e 0~ C~ 'A 1~ T A8SESSMEN7 DIAGFiAAA I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 T17. NP..~ 1'3~~-2 It ! 1• I\ ~ 1 Id I7 I~ 19 i 20 12t I ~~ i ~,..~~ ~ ~ 24 I A ~' ~ I ~'~~/ IJ ~ i 12 I I t 0 9 ~ 7 8 f 3 d J 2 ;//~' i ~0/,' Cwar .~d .?~ '//~/ ~ ~ % / ~ ~ 111 ~ ~~~ /,'% ,, ~.~..~..a~ , '/~ ~ .; ,/,~ - ..r .r.~ ~~ i ...,.....~.... j A • i/ ,~ ~{ ~~ 3 ~- v~ y qr ~ ~ r~'i~' y^ C11R 01 !RANCHO ~'OCA1[ONGA _ ~ ~ ,~_;;~\ y OOVPTP! 01 eAN ~NA;DII'10 11~ // ASSESSMENT' DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Nq. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NqS. 1 AND 2 ?RACY ~1P. ,:v., I{I ~ ~ / 33 ~ ~ ~ i/~'/j~ I 2 3 4 z ~ a 7 ~r//~! ~ ~ ~~~/ 'SI •60 49 II 114 13 12 11 f0 9 a ~~/~ ~I 1 i ~i ~~~~~ 46 46_ a i 4a ii ii la la n la Iv 20 ~Lie'~ ;: 37 43 42 41 II I ZO 24 ZJ 22 21 I I 3a I34I ~~I,II ~ ~~ ~~ ~i/ 36 ~ I 36 34 I 3,y ~ ~ j _-- = _ - _~31I3, ~ ~~~ ;~;` arr~r o>r a~-rlcao cvcwvoKa~ ~•~;~~ covrrr~r o>t wII anr~w~a~o ~~' ~ srs~I o~ cun~osrnn ~T ,,,, , '%'1 ,,,•, ~ ASSESSMENT I.~AGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 •A>IEIINE AO ~-- z a LL C'a r _~ J to y R of T.ob ~~~' -FOOTHILL esas, .na eaoa t. ~"!'~}^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM1IOINGA >, 1\~s I jy ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ __ 6 ~> VICINITY ~tAP r-~ ~~^ i t.n.no. Obtrlet No. t ^ title; , N p.ee ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ~ ~ Y Ann•utlon of Lol. ~ tMu 12 IncluUvs of AtCI ~SE7 to L~nd~cap~ M~Mt.n~ne• Dblrbt No. 1 ~''~"'~' CITY OF RANCHO CU title; 6 it ENGINEERING DIVISION ` irn VICINITY N9AP 0~8r ~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT ii ~i II ' `~'~'Lw~iVCAaiDL T?iiiTlTC~\ ~l\V1I lll11Jl V1V~1 ~\V. G I tVIC"1'ORIA PLAtiNEU COMVIU~ITY) i i ~ I 3 ,'`I;: ~, ~' • -~~ ti;~ ",,<J ~~~. •_Lr`,iW..iVV. (.nj~ Vii: ~{'..~f!it'tJ~n57^^i"~-~ .. ~w , fs...1 i r~ rs;~~ 000_ `'~ ~~~T v~ 0 0 0 ~~ FISCAI, YEAR 1989/90 j C1TY OF RANCHO CUCA:v10NGA ,' i I III ,°, P,;:P'1";'F1) I;1'~ A.;f'FP;^'""'T' .~ ~.., n„ ~ ~,.~. ~ .. , , vrunn .~~, r. Ai.n ~':1RT ~~I APPROV@:I): _ _ _ _ _--- RU~iSF,I,I. ;VtAGUiRF:, (IITY F.NGINH.ER ii City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Victoria Planned Colmnunity Fiscal Year 1989/90 The annual repot for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. This report deals with the maintenance costs for fiscal year 1988/89 and the projected rt~a intenance costs for fiscal year 1990/91. These projected casts are used to determine the assessment rate required to provide the highest quality of landscaping at the lowest possible assessment. The funds are used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways, parks, and trail improvements. Maintenance of this district is considered of general benefit to all areas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance of parkways, parks and trails include repair of irrigation systems, removal cr replacement of all or part of landscaping improvements and necessary cleaning and repair of trails. The maintenance also includes providing far the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping. ._..._.....~, _r__~_..y~ ~____.,_...~ _.. _~.. .. ___...~ __. .. ....... ... ...~..s .... well as removal of tr inuni ngs, ru,bbi sh or debris are part of the ongoing maintenance. Walls immediately adjacent to parkways are repaired and kept free of graffiti as part of the maintenance process. Fork, parkway and trail improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No, 2 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisicns. The plans and improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval Eor each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Fiscal Year 1988/89 The loan repayment was reduced by 60,000 to provide funds for the completion of the White Alder project. Parks and parkways experienced a lot of vandalism which shows in the high expenditures in Co ntract Sarvices. 88/89 As of Projected Hudqet 3/31/89 6/30/89 Assmt. Admin. 11,200 11,200 11,200 Maint./Dper. 8,000 3,584 5,040 Ueh. Maint. /Oper, 10,604 49 10,604 "Contingency Trees 9, OOC -0- 9,000 Loan Repay. 92,000 -0- ""132, D00 Contract Serv. 125,000 124,607 161,592 Tree Ma int./Coot Adm 10,000 -0- 10,000 Capital Fxpend. 72,000 -0- 12,000 ~Aater 100,000 52,626 96,300 Electric B,ODD 3,239 5,760 Park Ma int. 720,000 11,223 56,208 Wn ite Alders -0- 31,924 31,924 505,804 238.452 541.628 During fiscal year 1908/89 parcels originally asses sed as vacant land were developed. These parcels total 51 4 addtttonal antis . "Currently there is $10.000 in the reserve accoun t for tree replacements Cvn.n ~ m~~nv n4 nvm nr ___ __ ____ __ ... .. ..._~ ... Ain n_4_n__v T ___ .. .. n a.i.il4ir.n~l C[ __ _ _ /1 n .. .. ~.. r ._I1 ., A.~n~nA __ 1. ... - 4~ .. _ ___~ c fiscal year 1989/90. ""$100,000 from Carryover funds. I i i Fiscal Year 1989/90 The projected expenditures Eor fiscal year 1989/90 will provide Ear continued maintenance of parkways, parks and trails. Budgeted funds Ear capital projects are for moisture sensors and/or reconstruction projects. Landscape District 2 Proj. Hudget 87/BB 88/89 89/90 Admin. 9,064.00 11,200 14,056 Overhead -0- -0- 3,329 Payroll 8,662.70 -0- -0- Fringe Hen. 4,797.00 -0- -0- Maint/Oper. 14,469.86 5,050 30,000 Veh. Ma int. 1,725.40 10,604 12,000 Contract 75,583.42 151,592 305,000 Cap. Expend -0- 12,000 ID,000 Water 47,029.83 96,300 150,000 Electric 2,231.50 5,760 12,000 Irreg. Res. -D- -0- 10,000 Park Ma int. 13,271.73 56,208 142,000 "Renov. 834,331.78 -0- -0- Tree Rem. 4,873.33 -0- -0- Contingency -0- -0- 5,000 Loan Repay. -0- 100,000 50, DDD Copt Adm/Tree Maint. -0- 10,000 15,000 White Alders -0- 31,924 -0- Trail Maint -0- -0- 5,000 Large amounts of new parkways assumed for maintenance necessitate the increase in contract services, water and el ectr is itv. Projected Revenue - It is estimated there will be 3414 assessment units and approximately 699 acres to be assessed as vacant land. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible costs, the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1989/90 will remain at 5195/unit. Assessment receipts for any fiscal year are not received until after December 10. The estimated carryover funds will be usetl to fund the di ~rrirr ma, nr ananra ilnr 2l 73ni13rv inn _ ., n~• of taan __ the 1 raP_lm; _.._ Beautification Fund. 3414 A.U. x $195 = $665,730 699 Acres x $ 48.75 = $ 34,076 $699,806 Cacryover Funds $ 63,579 $767,385 dTY OF RANd-f0 GYlG4MONGA Lendaoepe Mdntanenca LYatrlct Na 2 ..,... - N.wMrn~ au. ao a...w. M nrti«..rt na.. ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 (HYSSOP AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBb1ITTEB BY: ASSESSiIENT REVENUE ADbIINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Zone A Hyssop The 1989/90 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ~- Zone A is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Givision 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape 5 *; ~i:^ act of 19'3;. .-.y^.._...g . This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 'Lone A lHyssopl for 7988;89 and projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality of landscaping while maintaining the lowest assessment. Assessments will be used to furnish services and materials far the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways in the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Zone AI is considered of general benefit to all parcels within Zone A and the costs shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating Eor disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal frcm walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. raa xway uuyc o.. oe~ , .,. .,.... .. .. .... ... ........ .. were constructed byvtheVjdeveloperV,The plans Eac the improvements are as stipulates in the conditions of approval Eor the development and as approved by the Engineering Divisions. Fiscal Year 1988/89 Review The maintenance of Zone A IHys sopl continues normal and routine. This portion of Landscape Maintenance District Na. 3 remains constant with eight parcels. No changes are anticipated. 88/89 As of Projected 9udget 3/31/89_ 6/3C/89 4csmt. nn;.,.i.^.. !'1. np '!2.nn iL.i~i~ Mai nt.~Oper. 50.00 14.98 35.00 Veh. Ma int. -0- -0- -0- Contract Serv. 900.00 696.53 900.00 Water 900.00 34.01 700.00 Elec tT is 100.00 75.50 100,00 Cantinyency 75_00 0- 75.00 1,057.00 853.03 1,341.00 Fiscal Year 1989/90 Zone A cE Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 is constant with eight Dart el s. 1989/90 EUdget Assort. A.3m in. 32.nn Overhead 10.00 Maint. /Oper. 135.00 Veh. Ma int. -0- Contract Serv. 1,450.00 Water 300.00 Electric I50. 00 Contingency -D- z,an.oo After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, projected expenditures, the assessment rate for 1989/90 will remain at $258.75 per parcel. B Assessment Units x $258.75 = $2070 ii GTY OF RANp-lO CUG4MONGA LeMSCepa MdnfanMpe Olatrlat 9A rr it --- N1N~m~nl n~b~ NwNw olnww~rn np~px City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Zone B - Coimnercia lj Industrial Fiscal Year 1999/90 The 1909/90 annual report for Landscane Mainten ante District No ? - Zone B ICommerc is l/Industriall is prepared in compliance with the requiz ements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California Il.andscape and Lighting Act of 19721. This report provides information outlining projected costs Eor fiscal year 1909/90 for Zone B ICommerctal/Industriall. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining the lowest assessment. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials far the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of median islands within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3- Zone B is considered of general benefit to all parcels within Zone B and the costs shall be aividea as indicated in this report. Maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any pact of any median island improvement, providing Ear the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaprng, trinuni ng, spraying, fertilizing or treating far disease or injury; the removal of tr inmli ngs, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from _____ _^_~ccc t __ _.._ ____..____ _..~:. Median island improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Zone 9 were conskructed by developers and; or City contract, The plans for median island improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1980/89 Review Haven medians Erom 4th Street tc R/R north of Baseline were completed. High water consumption Iduring construction and plant establishment) and higher than projected contract maintenance charges caused this district major problems. The total assessment rate projected did not provide sufficient funds. A wind storm destroyed many *rao5 and irri garian Spr_n41nr neade need to be replaced to conserve dater. Due to the financial status of the district tree replacements ace planned Eor 1909/90. During fiscal year 1900/99 the following projects were annexed to Zane B of Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 ICommercia l/Industr fall. LANDSCAPE 3-B - ANNEXATIONS FOR 1989-90 ANNEX 17 DR 87 26 30.5 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 18 DR 87-16 .5 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 19 DR 86-43 2.5 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 20 CUP e7-04 3.84 ASST. UNITS DR 86-32 .59 ASST. llNITS ANNEX 21 DR 87-41 1.28 ASST. UNITS CUP 87-92 2.27 ASST. IRIITS ANNEX 22 PM 10941 7.29 ASST. UNITS DR 86-08 1 ASST. UNITS DR 87-52 ~.VC ,,, ,a 88 .,.o, ASST. NJ3. UNITS V,~icJ ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 21, 1998 DR 97-29 8.7 ASST. UNITS DR 87-65 16 ASST. UNITS CUP 85-19 i 6 ASST. UNITS Fiscal Year 1989/90 AL1 parcels within Zone B will be assessed on a net acreage basis Ear the maintenance of landscaped medians on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west tc east City Limits, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street Erom Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and other median islands on major divided highways within the Industz ial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. For fiscal year X989/90 the median island on Haven Avenue will be maintained Erom 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel. Additional phases of Haven Median are under constructed but only area fronting cononercial development will be assumed by this district. Projected 1989/90 Expenditures Assmt. Admin. $ 624 Overhead 590 Maint./Operations 10,000 Vehicle Ma int. -0- Contract Services 69,000 Water 12,000 Electric 600 Ccntingency 1,000 Cap. Fro]. 30,000 Tree Ma int./Cont. Adm. 2,000 $125,814 After review of expenditures for 1988/89 and projected casts for 1989/90 it has been determined the assessment rate for Zone H will be $160/acre. This is a major increase due to high maintenance costs, water and the need to replace trees. 737.7 Acres x $170 = $125,409 qTY OF RANG-(O GYlG4MONGA Lendsospe Melnrenenoe peblot 9B ~~ - i«w.muie nw ,rwr a w.rwx qw __ ASSESSMEM' DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ANNEXATION N0. I7 dwwOW w0U t( i~ ~; .:: :_ ..: cr_ f I I _ ... $ ~ •.: r.2 i,il_ I „~ ~I ' . I ~ ~V , +~ ' G X51 f.I ~~ r °~~~_C ~ ' } C r1 I~ I r~Y ~~ f' 1 . y~ ~ _ _ • : ~ ~ ~ I ~ 'I~ I ~• ~ ~~ '~ I ~: 1 bZ ~i ~'N~ ~.. .~ + i _~~~ ~~~ 1 ~ ~ /J _. rJ~liid. .~ p ~ ~ +'r W F~I _ i O L' R rJ ~ .:.. ~,~,,\..~ CfTY OF RAYCHO Cdr ~: ~~' = EVCIVEERI;YG DIVISION ~,~~,.1.,., ... _ - - 1~T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM __ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION NO. IS SITE /MfNILL ne~.o ~MUlfl-111MILr N011~11~ CON-bi% MIW Ys MY1 V ~~VM ` ~/A 111AInV/ -- ~1 , / M~Ct LMK - `AW1wrl ~ ~IW11A / ~.~ W OIM~ ' ~II.D MItOW NW, ~ ?~~i `~%~c~~M CITY OF RANCHO Cl'CAJICetiGA -'',-~: ~`~~ ,' IF i E\GINEERI`G D11'ISION T •~ - - ` ~ ~'ICI~ITV ~ ~I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 3 4NNEXATION N0. IQ ~ 3 g ~- Y,~..\ ~^ CITY OF RANCHO Cl.,'C~~1O[YCA .: ` ~ E\C;INEERINC DIVISION ._ vlciNlrv ~~ap 1~T ASSESSMENT . QIAGRAM ~_ LANOSCAP! MAINTENANCl~~013TI11CT•,NO~ ANNlXATION N0. s'• ' JL 87.04 ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ . !:' J ~. ;., .: 3 y'~~~~", CITY OF RANCHO Cl,'CA,`IOINGA .~~ . a .. _X+~~S~'- .1 °`$~ ~ I ENGINEERING DIVISION `---~~ vtctNlrv ~t~P n ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. 21 3~S ~~~ ~~ ~,~\.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAu~IOPICA ~-,rasa ~ ;j ,s ENGINEERING ^w~SION , ;„, ; VIC~• ~ T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ,3 ANNEXATION Np, 21 ~o` t~~ ~~ ,,-1~ . CITY OF RANCHO ~~+~IOINGA . ~" .~ E...;INEERING DIVISION , \ i:f '' VICIVITY S,aP ~T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I-ANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 9 ANNEXATION N0. 22 1'~AAN ~~. 38 7 ~~~ ~. CITY OF RANCHO CllC,q~y~/y~~.~ r ~V{~/~ ii ~~_ z~ ENGINEERING DIVISION C ~ VICIN~*V MAP N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM lAND5CAPE MAINTENANCE OISTlIICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0, ~a ,r. /r T"'~ I' 1 1 Ifi ~ ¢. I ~~ i fill I 1 ~~ o ~I ~~ ~i~~ ~ S~T~ ~ 3~g "~~~' CITY OF RAlYCHO CCfCA+~K t'~ ~. :~~~ ~ ;~ ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY h1AP n N I i I I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION NO. a'~l~l ., _ _ ~~ ~ i /" ~ i, .~ 1 1 ~rN~^ / Le ~~, rl ~ ~~ I ~ _ _ j w !i i ~ ~ ~~ ~ e' d ii 4 t' i I f~~ > tl Iw 1: ~ I I ' I;f wi 1 I ~~ f ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 4 '~ ~ ~ N0111M I ~ j U __ i ' ~ I ~ .all: ~` 111 r ~~~'-f~ '~ ` ~; I ~~^'I t•~~c "r ~,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,~IONC'A c1 ''t~:l+' I~ ENGINQBRING DIVISION ~ T ~T6 VICINITY lv ASSESSME'VT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 01$TRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION N0. ~~. ~/ 3l~ ,~y"~.2" ~, CITY OF RANCHO CI.'G,~IOPIGA t~ ~'~ w "'c,~~. ` ~~ "~~' ,~ ENGINEERING DIVISIQN ~ T "~' ~~rr VICINITY MAP 1V ASSESSMENT DIAGP4M LANDSChrE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 ~ ...... r~r-^ i rte:.: I~~i 1__.1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - ,7e ' .~~ i TE 7 ~ .°°......' ~ '~ t~ ~-~._. _ _ IIK~ ~ ~ ~ppyy~~U f,~ "r~, r_ rWMM~ I Mt.._W1~Yr '1 Iri-h L_ .,.~ ~~ i ,~~~•. crri of ~wcso cvcAacoxas j' _ '= covrrri of eur atex~n~o . ````~~.~'''}}}[[[.yyy,,'JJJ~~~~~~yyy~~~~'''///jjj'yyy' Y ar~~ of c~tu~ou~ttn b.e ~,utiatr ^q" ASSESSMENT DIAGrtAM LANDSC..PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET IIGNTiNO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOSI t AND e J 1 a t i 1 i N '4 h1 ~ ...r .~ + i N ~ t i .... i. 1~ T^-• _ I 1 1 s .Sv i h a 1 f Iw (, 1 1 h~ • /-~ •- 1'I SITE / ~ I ~ ~1' ~ ~. ~ 1~ ~.. pl ` it ' ~ f I+w ~ .. rr.r..~ !! ~.~ i~ .,~ d~~ 1 +a.-+J'. __ . ti ~~ r.l NI ~ 1 rrrw d ~' J ~~ ,.. 1 ~ 3~ ~' °i ; CTP! 0>t EAafC80 COCA~tOlQOA OOt1NTT 0? SAi~1 SitNAtD1N0 r p~~a~ ~xl,tat: "a" ASSESSMENT OIAC 'AM LANDSCr-PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 • STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 = ---,_ ~ L FOOIMI~I ; •flIXIL(VII1U -~ A~_ /, .. t i `a C V i~ '.l~+s, ~ t. ~k. •._ !. ~.._.K. 3.~.. ~'' .r . • ~a ~a .or ~ .a nor I ror ~a ~a roe © D 'J G ?~ ~ rJ '.~ ~ v .. _-FwrrwrNxrt 1~ s ;Q» ,- Q n -- ~~ -=sr~str n G :~ ~ ®~ao r, rr Q ~ ~ t'. pp w at ~ '• .: C r I ~~3~~ ,~~~.w., Cl'P! O~ LWC80 CCCA>Ii01tGA ~- ------ s~ . , : 001JM1'T 0>t aAaD DBl'iAEDlItO arArs Of OALU'OENtA * ~ .-._-- =~ 6 i V :. V u ro ); ^. >, OR8ESSMENT DIAL AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND e - - ,,,,,^, weie -- ~.~ _ r"~~~ V ~ ~ I ^ - ~ I ti, ~...~ ar~~-~ ,.... ((,,.... ,1. I~- _ It-. ~ , ~, ,,.... ~~ ( ~iYlf\J ~ ~ ~n ~~_~M4 ~I ~ ,•..u,. 1 ~~~ 31~;fS ~~' R3i;;31 ~~ rte- iaw.w w ---~~v. ~..~~1 y ,~~ crri as >~nxcao cvcw~oxa~ s' ~' oovrrr~r o>r ~x s~silAaon~o • ~~= ` eTSTS of cAt~o>Rxtn ~. 6 ~ N --~- `, ibis- ff ~.~_ OS3E83MENT DIA ,RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIONTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 -. ~~1 I ~r , ~ ~ ~ ~. - --r i ~~, , , „~ ~~, 1, ~~ ~~ { ~~~ "~~ '"~ r' ___, i I ,^ ---- a -~-- -..... .~ ~~ - ~ ~; ~ -j _ ~ ~~ ~ ly I ~ •4 _~ , ~ ~ ~ ~'~-~.~' r----~ l .~ys s,~'" ''~ crrt os surc~o cva-~coxa~ ~T~' ~~ COUM7 os eAl~f DilI~1A~DII~10 c 6Td ~ s'1'A'PS OI CAL,Q~D>MRA N XN~ ASSESSMENT DIAGgAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND B Arrow I ~ a AT & SF RR ~ v Y i s ~ Q 6th > _ _i ~~ r dru _ ~ ~uV~ I I I-l0 Fwv li i ~ ~ 39 ~r ~,v~~! ;. CPP! 0~ sA1~iC80 COCAI[ONGA .,t',~~ C4UM'T 0' SAN D01~fASDIIiO ', `' aTA'PE Oi CAL~OENLA N I-SSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6 IW IQ W W V 6 to STREET FUTURE 6C1/GOING ~'I 39 ~ svff~wy~ C1TT OZ EAl~tCliO CGCIWOI~GA COUMT OS All DRI/ASDIIiO ' `' aPA'17 4# CAL~O~itA :,. --~-- r -+ I (/~}~ASTRfE7 if ~ nr ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t ANO 6 -- Q-:aaTM spar a __________-__,I I~~ "~ ;~~~~ ;~{----~-----"';F l~ r.eur~~ I~ wa-a- V;~i ~ ~ ~ V p L L a A J _~.~.~.' 11 -- --------VIII ~ ~w ~ l « v '1i; ;'. -------,i~ i' +~a-a-M ;I ~y _ I ----}{ nna-a-u I~ iy II I 11 M Ma ~-" 11; lam'- r ;~ 41I I ; ; ~' yy I C . A wa. r-. ~ I ~ i ~ II i -,~ I ` .~I ----~--,t--~ ., , ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ., ~~ s-e-a`1 ~~'~~ II I wa '-I'1 ~ a.n ~~~ - 1. ~ ~,~ - -;-; wa-s-. ~~\ J i I rn a. ~.w ;~ i i~ \ ~ `~~...i ~~v , 39 ~ QvoJec h- SirG s.~~'c'I~,,Y: air os wtcso cvcwroro~ ,cT~~ oovrrr: o' e~x ~~n~o ~~_ ASSESSIYTL~NT DIAGRAM IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ST BEET LIGHTING MAINTEN! NCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 A~ E. ~9q 5.-0;'~ I crri o~ snxcao cvcNtotoos ~\ : M~~aiwwr n~ w ~ v ~wwv ~ Aw.y1/~ ~~ ~VV 11'11 LL L{' LV V, (~ x~ ,p f ~/ ASSESSMENT Dll SRAM LANDSa:APE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 6 Por. North GuCa mO nga ^Ir,^L„ M. B. 13/0 .;cvciaveo '+fS 23 i ~ " ~ . --- I _ _ . ~ ,... . ,_ ~ ~ sn Ee .. ~I f e ~ is ' ~ JF /tecven ~ ~ ~~~ 5.3~_-Y P~Y.,_ 5l ~E J i j i~ : NvC( $ 1 •01< y.,..,r h © ~ ~~ o ~.o,.~ ~ ,~. `~ ~,,,., a ..~. ~~ ~ w ~ 3 ~ ~ ~O 3 ~, ?J :'°: ~ ` I y .,, ~ ~ ~ , dal . ~, a 1 (..~ ~; ~ ~- ~/ACANT ~' OEVELJ>ED ~ Vn CAtiT ,•~~ ~ ~b~ ,.~i., CPPT 0~ LINCHO COCA1[ONQA s~ ~ ~ COVlrPY OI SAN SZRNAADII~10 STA17 01 CALD'OS1fIA ~~ 6 y~ ~~ N E xh~b~f 1SSESSMENT CIA~RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 - ~ ~a( ~~~ ;_ crr~r of ~xcso cvcwtioxas ` oovrrr~r os e~ur ssiwnsnn~o e: 6 aPA77 O>/ CALQ~OtMA o, ~T ~- lr - -- '- ------ v X,L7/ /7/ i 1SSESSMEN7 DIA..RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 'fi`r,. " "'.' "~ _ _J ~ ,t00th11 b1VC. , ~ __._ ~ - ~ ~_ --_ e a s a a~~ y A t E I ~ si`s Ivcatlon /o.~f5 AeRA-rY.tfY. arrow rou4a• .?~C~GA. 9/30 ~ ~ ;~. ~ I ~~ ,` ~~ I ~1 ..~ ~ it .t. al v- ~ f u r~ pi~~ CPT! 0~ ):AI1C80 CUC/WON4A ~•~\s COVM? Of MIl B><RI~IA>eD~10 0 ASSESSMENT iilA _RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTgICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTAIGT NOS. t AND 6 /~ ]' i % ~ ~~ KIM I- ~, ., ~, ~i ~. ~„ i d ~~ _~.~~w~ -~- - -,-- ~I ~I <MI ~ ! .q ' tN r ~I I M ~ ~ ~ W 1 i ~ ;~I `~ ~, a ~ '~~ i ' i ~r~3 s >~~ ~. ~_ . ~~~ crnr os ~+c~o cvc~laoxo~- OOUI+PP! AI aAN ~NA~DINo l1KX h/7 1 7 ~ x/~ ~ bi -, ASSESSMENT DIA®RA11A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 STREET LIGHTINCe MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 „ rr ~ p ~l d ~~ a~~ y i CT'P~ 01 LWCEO CpCA1[ONGA ` ~ I1~R 88•~ A I ~,_ 1 9 •..., Cl' _i ~/ ~ cdru nawb 1 ~+' e~~ri ~ '~ ~ ~, I Y ~{ Y (~~~c1t !9 Y ~ ~ 4 U~ / I~ _ t _ _ z. - ASSESSMENT DIA®F1AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 6 ' 3/T~' F. -~ ~~ ~ __~ ---° i ; ~ 3 d~ a ~ ~~ `"`ll I ... f _.__- a ~~ '~ ' w. ~ d~ ;~ ~ f~ ~ ~ id ~ i i r-- -~-1'~ ! ! ...... • `" ~'` - ~ ~ ~ r `~ t +~ I ' ~ ~` l i ... A -.-........ i .n, i i _ li Q i ar / M / I~ ~ ~ ,ivJ~ e47WY: ~- ~ I, III I, i~ I ti~ - il„ to . ~~, I~!I~ ~.. i I~ ~V(/ ._ ~ 'tea ~~ ~ /~Sr a;'~ crrf or s~wc~o ctJCwtiaxae ~F; ` \ y COUNTY at EAN m1f~KASDQ~O =: ~ Si'ATIe or cAL1rORNiA ~ T ~xr~-air H ASSESSMENT Dis-C3FtAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NA. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NAS. 1 AND 6 ARROW ROUTE y ~w ~ a z a JERSEY BLVQ. ~" ~ +yZ1 JOB9TE ~ I Q 2 x bill STREET •l ~~ l- l4 ,:.-- l ~~ ~~ ~~ ~'i~~Y Gl'Y'Y 0~ EAI~IC80 C~JCNIONAA ` ' i COUMT Oy ~AI1 B~NAlOjltO . s'1'A'17 01 CALtr0k1IA , i XLJIU/ ASSESSMENT [CIA®RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 8 ~~ - ti - --- --~-- r ~..,~, i ~ ~l ~~ ~ ~ I __ _ ~. - - I -p - -~ .a„yy ~ rat. 'µ ~..~.~ M N /~ --~ I b .1. . Irf . c.l.. r.+~- '~ - ~ ~' I ~~.. s [` Il~yl ~ t9TR~fY ulM1:N0 _u ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. I ~ ~~~~~~~~1~ Y~in ui:J_:iu uu ue Ii 'Y~ Q I J~rF ;~i~'^ lrTvtT Ot I!/lNCHQ CIIC/ll[4N®A. ~ I09.8 xh~bit " ..SS SSMENT fliA.iRAM I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 8 it r~~+ ~' :_:~- _~ .:~Lw rs: 4tilr ,.....il,~. I? ~ QIT! 0! SANC80 C~JCAit0I1GA ~ ~ ~Qf399-~c~ ~ " _ G°"~1'1'!- OJ- ANN ~lwORM~-Pl'~'xA _..--_--- s~!!~ _ . AssESS(~'EN~ BiA®RA~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOg, 1 AND 6 a s ~~~ ss''~Di +. Cam! O~ BANCBA CUCM[ANE}A _? ~ COUIr'4'Y OI MN ~A&DII't0 ~ ^_ Exhi ~ ASSESS NT DIAC3RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANC£ DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 6 a / / G£~ I / / ~~.AVENL~_ F~.,,__ // i 9 ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ w ~ tt~ l4 ~`1 N / ] L\ ~ ~ ~; J '/ i3 /~ / \ i~ 1~ ~ 1~ ~~ a ! [ 7 r ~ m ~ G.~ \ / ~ ~~ •~`~ - ~'~~ -~-11.x___. `~~` ~„ CIY;C CENTE~V[_ 5'9f.ET Tmb ~• C CEniE.9 DR. IORW[J/~GR~91F[RA A 011 yi ~ LE4[RG STREET LIGHT ® 97RELT TRE[ -- „~`~k CTY'4 Or SANCHO CtJCA~[ONOA DoT ~ >~ ~~ TA 1yi76 . COOJNP'r Or ~AAt B~NA~DIN® ~~'~ ~ sr~,Tr ar cAruO~A ~a.~,..~ [ 1 1P 1 I ~~~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMiJNITY) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9UBMI'PPED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMDVISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Mnual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Terra Vista Planned Camnunity Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 The annual report for fiscal year 1989/90 for Landscape Maintenance District Ne. 4 ;Terra Vistal is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. This report provides information outlining actual maintenance casts for 1988/89 and projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to Eurni sh services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways, parks and trails within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 is considered of general benefit to all areas within the district and the cost shall 6e divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance of parks, parkways and trails include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any pars of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for eisease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal Erom walls inured iately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Park, parkway end trail improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 were constructed by the developer of the individual subdivisions. The plans and improvements are as stipulated in the conditions eE approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Fl sc al Year 1988/89 Maintenance during the current fiscal year on landscaped areas continued to be routine. Currently there Ss $7,750 in the contingency fund which is for the replacement of trees lost in major storms or disasters, An additional 55,000 will be b~,ldgeted in 1989/90. Curi.^.g fiscal year 1999/99 the Eo11o'ding tracts wsre annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4: LANDSCAPE 4 - ANNEXATIONS FOR 1989-90 ANNEXED SEPTEFIDER 21, 1988 TRACT 13173 128 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13170 140 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED OCTOBER 19, 1988 PM 9897 30 ASST. UNITS PM 11341 23 ASST. UNITS MARCH 1, 1989 PM 11030 143 ASST. UNITS TRACT 14150 64 ASST. UNITS Fiscal Year 1989/90 Separate acco unts Eor trail maintenance and vandalism repair have been added. It i s important to be able to track these activities to establish a history. Proj. Budget 87/88 BB/69 89/90 Assmt Admin 4,780 1,440 11,276 Overhead -0- -0- 1,480 Maint/Oper 8,011 9,050 14,000 Veh Maint 815 1,500 10,000 Contract Serv 33,680 52,000 113,000 Cap Expend -0- 40,000 70,000 4later 9,167 30,000 52,000 Electric 399 1,000 2,500 't'ree Mi4-onc num -J- iu,uJu i2,JJ0 Contig Trees -0- -0- 5,000 Irreg Rest -0- -0- -0- Payroll 1,849 -0- -0- Pring Ben 1,728 -0- -0- Park Ma Lnt 20,170 40,000 100,000 Trail Maint -0- -0- 3,209 81,629 190,990 $334,465 Following is the Assessment Benefit Matrix outlining the rate of assessment far 1989/90. Assessment HeneEit Matrix Proj. Bud987 Medians Parks Parkways Single Family Multi Family Estimated Cost Median Maintenance Cost Park Maintenance Cost Parkways Maintenance Cost Total Benefit Units Cost Applicability S.F. amts = benefit units Med/Parks/Parkways M.F. units benefit un itsli/tl Parks benefit units Med/Parkways Sinqle Family Benefit Assmt $ x Ben units = $ Credits Carryover x Net Henef it $ x Multi Family Benefit Assmt $ x Hen units $ Credits Carryover x nec aenec tc a x TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT BENEFIT MATRIX FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 Medians Parks Parkways Single Family 1438 A.U. 11,964.16 78,989.34 87,617.34 Multi Family 1478 A.U. 12,296.96 81,186.54 45,026.65 Commer- cial 113.44 AC 1,888.64 12,469.11 -0- Vacant Land 93.54 AC 1,556.13 -0- -0- 27,705.60 172,644.99 132,643.99 ESTIMATED COSTS Median Maintenance $ 27,705.60 Park Maintenance $172.644.99 Parkway Maintenance $132,643.99 $332,994.58 Benefit Units Medians Parks Parkways c:nnlc cam:ly 14iR a n 1408 a n tliA a rt Multi Family 1478 A.U. 1478 A.U. 739 A.U. Commercial 227 A.U. 227 A.U. -0- Vacant Land 187 A.U. -0- -0- Single Family Benefit Assessment $124.18 x 1438 = $178,570.84 Credit -0- Carryover 19.18 x 1438 = 27,580.84 Net eenef it $105,00 $150,990.00 Multi Family Benefit Assessment $ 93.72 x 1478 = $134,956.18 Credit -0- Carryover .93 x 1478 - 1,374.54 $ 92.79 $133,SBt.64 Commercial Benefit Assessment Credit Carryover Vacant Land Benefit Assessment Credit Carryover $126.57 x 113.44 Acres = $14,358.10 _0_ -0- $726.57 $14,358.10 $16.46 x 94.54 Acres = $1,556.13 -0- -0- $16.46 $1,556.13 arr of Ravaio cucaneoNC~a c~~wwo. awM~nra. defrbt Na . ,__ ~w.fw a.wrrwr ASSESSMEIV~T .A. 1.ANO3 APE MAINTENAN OIA09AM STgEET LIGNTINO MAINTENANCE DEISTq CT NO3O1`AND 4 ~_J,! %~+,~t ~ _ / - %\ S iA. I ~ i~ ~ I ~ ~P...1 4 i ~`'v ~'f~ ~~~^II'`~,~ a _~•W/• `. ~ ~, ,~ , u i 1- ' L ~'..,.. , rtl _ r `, ~ 1', -A,"•`, • 1• \.~ ~ ~ '~",rte-~ ~T; . ~~ ~~ 1 ~ 1 i ! ~y , J ~,.~ - I ~~~ ~~_ 4'I " s°~~°.''~. QTY 0>/ EAl11Cdp /~ ~'1'AT>! 0>/ CA~pyRw "'- N ASSESSMENT OIAG'~M ~ANDSG.~PE MAINTENANCE OISTIIICT NO 4 STREET 110NTINp, MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND a &~- ~I ~ ~'c'1~,,, crr~ os ~c®o ~~o~- ey `F \~ OOVlfri OE EAN MaNyp~p e: ~ Il'A17 0~ CALpip~ V~ AS~L~88MENT ~ DI! 3RAM -~ LANI.3CAPE MAINTENANCE OIS 8TREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE 018TR CT NOSO14AN0 4 ,~~~ ~ ~c~ :~ \ COUM'! 0)I EMI ~; ~1'A17 O>/ QAipp~1RA ~- N ASS~S~(I~ENT ~ DID IRAN _~ LANG„CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO • STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~~ a „I• I . ~~ ~~ .._ ,~~ _ .-,T- . 'gg5..~i,ro. _T_.__ ~ v.,, r.. uI s•; c. 5 ~ '~ ~ . -~.~ I i'- • ^1 - 1 ~~/ ._~ !1 ~ ~ u~a( cnr:os~ oovxr~r o>r ~ >fl'ATS 0>I CALD~0SIQA ~T ..~ i _ -_ _ ~~~ i~ ~ ~- _ ~`~ ` f~ ` ` ' ~ 1 ~_ ~'~ •. . rl rw' ~~.i~~~~ \ ` /~/yll r 1 ' 1 L _ _ I `J ~ K ~1~ ASS~~9ML~~T OI.~aRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIONTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 4 ~~d- '~~ i ^~ 6 ., ~- v, aot~xrY a gnu app ~,-~~ N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D{STRICT NO 4 STREET IIdNTINd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 4 t~~3 ' s,'r/w " 6 • ` • ,..~„~,~ W i i Q~ / ~A ~~ W r N ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AISTRICT N0.5 czar im') '' ~ i ~ . h r , r , i ~~ ~ i ~' ~.: '~ ~ /. FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: A39E33MENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RU99ELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lotl Piscal Year 1989/90 The 1989/90 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lotl is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 1, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California ILandscape and Lighting Act of 19741. This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs Eor 1988/89 and projected costs Eor fiscal year 1989 /90. The projected costs are used tc establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping vh ile maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkvays and the tot lot within the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance Distrtet No. 5 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as Lndicated in this report. Maintenance of the tot Lot and parkway include the repair, renoval or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease os injury; the removal of trimmings rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from va lls Lmmediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Parkway and tot lot improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivision. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval Eor each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Fiscal Year 1988/89 Maintenance continues normal and routine in Landscape Maintenance District Na, 5. There were no annexations to this district during the currant fiscal year. The district was formed with the A/ units within the tract and theca are no plans to expand the district. Piscal Year 1989/90 An increase in contract services is required due to a change in contractors. Additional monies will also be budgeted far tree replacement due to storms. Proj. Hudqet B7 88 BB/89 89/90 Assmt Admin 176 176 176 Overhead -0- -0- 23 Ma int/Oper 30 75 150 Contract Serv 1531 /B 36 3550 Water 227 300 600 Electric 158 lOB 125 3125 5495 4624 This district will continue to contain the original /4 units, After review of expenditures, asseasment receipts, passible carryover ($6,495) and projected costs, the assessment rate for Piscal Year 1989/90 will remain at $105,00. Assessment receipts are not received until after IJecember 10. The estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance until January. Assessment Rats 1989/90 ii Aanassuieul uui is a aiJ3 - gG,o20 Carryover Funds $ 762 $5,382 pTY OF RANpiO GYlG4MONGA Llgra~Dl MWI/MYp1 q~Ibbf hb. 6 ~r r -~AMw~nf hw nwr..anwirwwir. ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 (CARYN PLANNED COMM[JNPPSD ~ryµ~+ `' 00 ~.......,.......... U ... 0 0 FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUIIMri'1'!•;ll BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE AUMINISTRATIUN APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1989/90 The 1989/90 annual report Eor Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 fCaryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides infocmatien on actual maintenance costs and projected costs Eor fiscal year 1989/90. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Assessments will be used to furnish services and materials Ear the maintenance, operation, serVie ing and restoration of parkways within the d/strlct. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 is considered of general benaElt to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, remove) or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, Fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, reps Lr and gxaE[itl removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated erena. i aawruy iw~i av vumule ri li,iu ~eyv constructed by the developers of~the individual~subdivislons.. ~Theuplansrand parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Fiscal Year 1986/89 Maintenance of parkways within Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 have not been assumed due to major problems with the establishment of plant material. It is the City's policy to insure the quality of landscaping before the district assumes financial responsibility. The district may experience some minor expenditures by the end of the current Eiscal year. BB/69 As of Proj ectefl Budget 2/28/89 6/30/69 Assmt Admin 1696 1696 1696 Maint/Dper 800 15 150 Contract Services 40,000 6000 Veh Maint 1099 -0- 500 Pater 30,000 -0- 2000 Electric 2000 -0- 350 Tree Ma int/Contract Admin 1500 -0- 500 Contingency 2000 -0- =0- 79,195 1911 11396 The following tracts were annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 during fiscal year 1968/69. Piseal Year 1989/90 uuc i.u y. uLLcu,o w u eiouLo o ~iyaLiuu nr ~ieu,o a ueLo Lu Li,c district have not~been realized•to date. Funds collected incthe prior year will be rebated in the amount of $92,130. It is ant[c ipated that the existing landscaping will become the districts responsibility for maintenance during 1969/90. Parcels annexed to the district are as Eol lows: LANDSCAPE ti - ANNEXATIONS FOR 1969-90 ANNEXATION 3 TRACT 12GS3 19 S.F. TRACT 13555 17 S.P. TRACE 13556 40 S.F. TRACT 13556 52 S.P. TP.ACT 13560 23 S P TRACT 13561 13 S.F. TRACE 13563 11 S.P. ANNEXATION MAY 3, 1989 TRACP 13718 232 S.F. TRACE 13857 TRACT 13658 Projected 1989/90 Expenditures Assessment Administration 3756 Overhead 643 Maintenance/Operations 9000 Vehicle Maintenance 1264 Contingency/Tree Replc. 5000 Contract Serv/Vandalism 6400 Contract Serv/Maint 46,000 Tree Maint/Contract Admin 2600 Capital Projects 5000 Water 32,000 Electric 3000 Irrig Restoration 10,000 124,663 It is estimated there will be 17721 assessment units within this district during 1909/90. After review of possible expenditures and assessment receipts, and projected costs, the as sessment rate vi 11 remain at $195.00. Assessment receipts are not received until after December 10. To fund the district until January $61,252 will be used and the remaining carryover Eunds ($92,4301 vill be rebated. pTY OF RANp-lO GY!lC.4MANGA i..~. Awrrhrwo anar na e ~..». -M....I~.M wr 1rIN1~MMM14MI~Ip ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM __ ~pNDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. :a ANNEXATION N0.3 - TURF ® 4ROUND COYER ~ ~~ 0 S.F. ~~ COYER ~~ ao,+~o s.F. ~/ 33 ,~i`~~'^`^, CITY OF RA`CHO Cl'C~~IOIrt'A ~'.-f:~ :'W, • `" E\GINEERI`G DIVISION .:~ w ` ~_ ~ VICINITY ~1.iP •• N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM __ IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ANNEXATION N0.9 n ulu m a~ a ~ b ~~ a ~ s f~ » u 1f 1f fl ~~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ,~ tl ~~ « 19'I'I'I_~lIE I«I«1«\~~ ~ ruRf ~ GROUND COVER 7 47S g F U~y GROUND COYER AREA ss,m s.~. ~.~~ ~`~ ". `•', CITY OF RA\CHO C(:CA.~1O(~CA } ,-!': e ~?"~' ' '~' 3 E~GI~EElII~G nlt'ISION -~.~' t'ICINiT' ~r't ~T ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM __ UINOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. G ANNEXATION N0.3 i i 7 ~ i 1~ ~ ti 11 it li 1/ li 11 f 1 i / ^ - ~ -~ ~._ ~ ~ ii L7 a 7i T r u ~ I~~iil„~~~~~~ «IsliilAl« ~ TY~ JlRE Q GROUND COVER 0 S.f. c~~s GROUND COVER AREA q,~0 S.f. ,~?%`t'L`~'`^, CITY OF RANCHO Cl'CA.~IOi~;GA r fit': ~ _ A ='~' i E~(:INEEitI`G DI~'ISIOV .. ~ ~ _.. ~'ICIvITY !' ~P ~S4''3 __ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4NNEXATION N0.3 J ruRF GROUNO COVER CROUN~ COVER Aij~ s,on s.f. n,~s s.f. ~/3 b > ~,,,. ~. CITY OF RAtiCHO CC'C,+-.~IOI~,~ ^ ~''_ ~. 3 E`CIVEERI~ ^ QIYP .. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. C+ -- 4NNEXATlON NO.3 - TURF GROUND COVER ~ ~ GROUND S,,QVER Ada +,300 S.F. n.r3o S.F. (~3 ~"~~"^ CITY OF RA`CHO CL'G.~IOI~;GA ;, ~'~ ; E`GIVEERi`C OIY1510~~ `T t~ ' ~'ICIVITY J1AP 1~ r.v ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM -- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. L ANNEXATION N0.3 - TURf GROUND COVER T RP ~ e~ z.aoo s.~. ~3 ~ GEOUND ~~ ~~ 41,000 S.P. ,,~ „~ ~~'~ "1`''",. CITY OF RA\CHO Cl,'CA.~IC ,-r., I: S~•i~!S ~7 ~~ i~ E~c~~"~EIII~G DIVIS~AN M 2 \~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANpSCAPE MAINTEN4NCE DISTRICT N0. G -- ANNEXATION N0.3 -TURF ~~ ~~ GROVNO COVER 6,20G S.F, 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ s t • ~~ ~ q A i N N g q M • q q ~ y H~y7t q'iq A U » N tf U hM7/1fb71q~ ~l~Q COVER ~~ 4,s~o s.f. ~~ i ~~~s~+, .~'~ ~/ ~~ ~*^ i ---~- OF RA~CtiO E~GINEERIXG DIVISION VICINITY ~L{P 'S~{ 1~T ExNIaIT ^A^ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 Banyan S Lots 58~6t Lot A, Tra< Ave. Parkway 1, Tract 13857 4ve. MOdian Lnt A, Lot 32 8 I of 33, Tract t rtvenor Slreel hr ' ~~ yen nve Parkway: !ti6Xen Ave Median: ?lnyan Sf Parkway I of A Lab 32 8 33 iqq 13718: I ~;i A Trap 1?A57 :0159 11. Trarl 1JP57 L^IS Sa 61 'ra~11305a I1Nt , 19,920 f 1. 21 ~ 21,22/ f.l. - 85 • 13.292 a.l. BS 11.688 f 1. 131 8.113 fJ. 1,320 f f, 2, 780 ~ 1. .~Il~~ ~/ ~ 1, •~'\= * y -~~e~~ 1,521 f.l, 10,421 f.l. 11.133 a.1. 101 ~ ~7O CTl'T OI L1NC80 COCAYOIfOA COUNTY OI AAN ~NA>lOIItlp e'1'ATS O>r CALD~O1<N1J- 1~ T RE90L.1IT10P1 NO. 8 / - ~ 3 A RESOLl1TI0N OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO Cl1CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING RS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5, AND 6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 198N90 PURSW Wi LANDSCAPNJG AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HFARNG OBJECTIONS THFAETO The City Councl of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant ~ the provisbns of the Landscaping and Lghflng Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Calgomia, does resolve as lolbws: SECTION t: That Me pudic interest and convenience require end N is the Intentbn of this Ciry Council to levy and collet assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. t, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, and 6 for Me fiscal year 1989/90 for the maintenance end operatbn of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated br common preenbek purposes by tleed or recorded subdivision tract map whhin the boundaries of SeW Districts. Said melntenance and operation includes the cost and supervlsbn of parkway maintenance (including sprinkler systems, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures and walls, and related facllities) in connectbn wfih said districts. SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be boated within the roadway rignis-of-way and landscaping easements enumerated In the report of the City Engineer and more partbularly described on maps whbh are on file in the City Clerk's OBbe, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. t, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5, arW 6". SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinbn of said City Council is of more than local or ordinary pudic benefit, end the said Ciry Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said distdcts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which distdcts are described as folbws: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the extedor boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. t", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", 'Map of Landscape Melntenance Disidct No. 3", 'Map of Landscape Maintenance Distrct No, 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance Distrct No. 5", and ^Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6', indirsting by said boundary lines Na extent of the territory included within each assessment distrkN end whbh maps are on file In the Office of the City Clerk of said Ciry. Referenco is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more partbular deswipibn of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all detalts as to the extent of said assessment dlstrlcts. CRY caNCw Risn'iOLUTgN LMD 1, 2, 3A, 38, 1, 5 and 6 May 17, 1989 Pape 2 SECTION a; The Chy Council of said City by Rwabdon No. 89-_ has approved the annual repoA of the City Engineer whkit report indbates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district hourtderies, assessment zones, and tha method of assessment. The repoA tale 'Annual Enpbeefs Report b on flb m the OfBCe d the City Clerk of sekt City. Re`.erence b said repoA M hereby made for all peAiWlarS for the amount and extent of the assessmens and for the exbm d the work. ,~S: Nofke is h«eby phren Mat on Iha 21ST day of June, 1989, at the hour of Tao P.M. in the City Council Chambers b Me Chy of Randro Cucananpe, arty end 9Y persona may appear and allow cmree why aeW wodc atrould not be done «carried out «why assessmens should not be levied and cdlected for Racal yew 1989/90. Protests must be b wdibrp and moat contain a descrlptbn d Me property b wMch each sgrr« Hereof is bterested, sufOdent b demiry ttre same, erd moat be dowered b Me City Cbrk of said City prior b the time set br 1118 heeAlip, wld Iq OMw pNfBBIB Or Obn6 wia be aonaldered. II Me siprlef d arty protest Is not shown upon the last equalized assesament roll such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidwrca that such aipner b the owner of tha ProPBM so deacrlbed. SECTION s: AM the work h«elrl proposed shall be done and canted Mrouph in parSUanCe of an ed of Me lepialatwe of the Stwe of CaBfomia desgneted es the LandscapMrp and Lighting Act of 1972, beklp Division 5 of the Streets end Highways Cade d Me State of Cakfomte. SECTION 7; PUdiShed notice shell De made pursUBd b $8(:11011 8981 Of the liovemment Code. TAe May« shall sign this Resobtlon aid the Chy Clerk shall attest b the same, and tlw City Clerk shell cause Me same to be pudbhed 10 days bebre the date set f« the heaAnp, at least once in The Deity Report, a newspaper of penerel drouletbn published In the Ciry of Ontarb, Calibmia, and dreuleted in the Chy of Randro Cucamonga, CeIH«nie. n.~rv nc~ n enrrun riTr a xanntr. a ..rr :. ' STAFF REPORT GATE; Mqy 17, 1989 ::~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: JuQy A. Acosta, Jr. Engineering At de SUBJELT: Setting public hearing for June 21, 1989 for the Forsation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 for Tract 13566-1 and -3, located south of 24tH Street, west of Cherry Avenue RECONEIDATiON: It is recawaended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions initiating and forming Landscape Maintenance 01str1ct No. 7, approving the prcli~inary Engineer's Report and setting the date of public hearing for June 21, 1989. Background/Analysis The Caryn Coagany, developer of the subject tracts, has requested the City to form a landscape salntenarke district for landscaping and other laproveartnts within the pro,~ect boundary. The district will be foraxM with Tract 13566-1 and -3. All other tracts within this district will be annexed at bale of recordation. ` Res/t~~-' ' ~ j~~~' RHM:J Attachments ~-/~3 CITY OF RANCHO CiTCAMG7t1GA ENGINEER'S REPOIII' fT$t LANDSCAPE A4~IN1'EtW7CE DISIRICP NO. 7 TRACE NOS. 13566-1 & 3 SECTION 1. Rhin report is prepared in oa~lianoe with the *ecp,;*~~+- of Article 4, (riap- ter 1, Division 5 of the Street and highways Lbde, State of California (Iard- swpiig and lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. OQ~D••PAL DESCRIPl'IOti This report deals with the establishapnt of a rw~,c.-a+.e Maintenance District for the North Etiwaida area. Rhe District will originally coePrrise of Tract Nos. 13566-1 arcl 3, plus 24th Bisset from Wardman Bullock Road to (Ywiry Avenue. Areas to be iricludecl in the work program are the trees and planting within certain rights~of~.ay of streets as ~~*'~;~ by the City; street trees within street ric)hts~f-way and within dediwted tree mairM.enanee eases as required by specific plans or by the City Council. 11~e public parks, the 9Y aid paseo systems, ~mimity gateways, regioiul aid ommmity trail systems includiig lighting, signing, stripiiy and all other taprov~nts such as play equipment, felcea, walls, etc. within those systems; suc3i siwilar areas as required by the Specific Plan or by the City Council or as dedicated by various subdivisions. Rhe work program generally e~acludes the parkways laidacapir,g (e~ept the street r'oo¢1 ariinini... •,.n a....rn ....a ..t,a.... ._.. ..:._.: ., c.._:... __,~_---- -.~_: _,.. .. multifamily residential units aid adjoining oasoezcial and institutional developrent whic3i will be maintained by those developments. Rhe District will eventually itrlude the majority of the areas included within the North Etiwaida Specific Plan areas and other areas generally oooprised of Properties from Day Cnanlc Q~aiv~el to the East City bouidary and frrni Hic)hlan3 Avenue to North City bouidary. SECTION 3. S03PE OF WURIC The areas listed above will bemre part of the active work program at such time as the specific areas are dediwted to the aid accepted by City. The normal process will be the dedlwtion of the areas to the City, the areas inproved by the developer with lardscapiig, irrigation aM other required i,T~provements, then after a period of maintenance by the de'relapet as R„re„~;.,,~ try the City Engineer, the aoueptarw of maintenenoe by the Mainterenoe District. There will be a lag time free the original dedication until the District actually begins the malMenenoe of the areas. on certain work program areas where abutting properties will never be de- veloped, the District may install the needed improvenents as required by the City Council and maintain the same. 'Itre plans arcl speciffcatims far all iaprvtn~ltS within the work program areas to be installed by the developer will be cmPleted by the developer at their ast for the individual areas to be maintair~ad within the subdivision and will be approved by the mnnmity Development pepaxtmenG ~Nm~ ~i ~ineer~'s lfnepox will be P~paxed atti approved by the !'ity Ow~cil pmcgam for eadr year and its estimated mst. As development Proceeds within the District, the areas W be maintainxai by the District will increase and so will the oust; however the nether of emits will also increase. The estimated maintenurx~e oust atd estimated assessment rote per unit for the crigirial District and the ompleted District are tabulated herein after. 171e aesB^aBmellt rote 18 expected to increase year t0 year aS IDOTE areas are arv~md to the District until such time as all the properties within the ultimate district bouKlary are annexed, after wtnidr the asseassmart rote should regain ocrtstaaid ewcluditg mst of living increase. Maintenarc~ Activities Detail maintenance activities on the amass to be maintained by the District mnsist of providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of the landscap- ing including: cultivatim, irrigation, trimming spraying, feutilizirg ar treating for disease ar ircJury; r®oval of trimmitgs, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; mainterer~oe, repair and replaom~ent as naceaeaxy of all irrigatim systems; maiMenwfoe, repair, energy costs, azd r+eplaoement as necessary of all required lighting within the park, greenxay, Pasco and trail system; removal of graffiti fr® walls immediately adjaomit W the anltivated areas: repair, removal ar replacement of all ar any part oP arry iaprwmmant. SECfiW7 4. •'" "'mil - i.-~.:::e::-,y u,e uinui..C fua uc iyi~ni inQrOV~r mnerrtlc- ticn except for certain ~1 areas as mentraned in Section 3. 111e cyst of arty new construction will have nxgligible effect ar the total assessme~ of the District due to its scope in oaRnarison with the Overall District work Program azeas. Based ~ data frmm other cities and fete the City of Parxdco '9a for Iardsrape 6faiMerenoe Districts and iron the review of prnPosed work pro- gram areas, it is estimated that based on arrrent dollars, the maintrsance cost for assessmrit purposes, estimated areas to be maintained and the estimated number of assessmerrt units will be as follows: A. Phase one Construction the estimated costs for the original District a:mQriairg of Ttact tics. 13566-1 and 3 plus 24th Street from WarcLnan Bullock Road to Cherry Averene/City bandary are shown below: Equestrian Trail (including forces, mow strips and portals) 50,034 SF @ $0.05 $ 2,501.70 Parkways (including slopes 6 monamrnt wa1'cpes) 218,448 SF @ $p.30 = $65,534.40 572 FA @ $5.00 s S 2.860.00 ESTItIIC'1'ID 7V1'AL I~II11'Q~NIiCE C06T 570.996.10 B. C1>oplete District the estimated oos'ts (as ranrerrt dollars) for the District upon carQletion of all areas within North Etiwarcla ate as shorn below: ~aYSr tr"dusr 4~Ygr etc. plus reighbortnod parks 8,100,028 SF @ $0.35/SF = $2,835,010 oonmmity parks @ 60E Of 1,481,040 SF 888,624 SF @ $0.35/SF s 3tt_01o $3,146,029 SECPION 5. A copy of the proposed boundary map and legal descriptim of the Assessment District ate attadted m this report and labeled "Iardswpe Maintenance Dis- trict No. 7 "FSdtibit A" and "Hdlibit B." areas diagrams ara hereby inoor- pozated into the text of this report. Precise lot dimensions ate imltder3 in the refertlaexi tract maps and Assesecr's seconds. ab District Will originally czmprise Hicjilatds Tracts 13566-1, aid 3, plus 24th Street ft>m Wer[~en Bullock Road to Cherry Avenue. Additiorml tracts will be are~atoed into the District after its formatirn. aia final aantigusatian of the District may include mae of the North Etiwarda Specific Plan aid properties ooaprisirg the area Exam Day Creek east to the city baadaty aid Highland Avm'ue north to the National Forest limits. A Dopy of the pznpceed fitml District boemdary Ss attac3eed to this report as "EMubit C." bkA:l'1lrV b. A1JkS1MhN1SS A. Fhase One Maintenance costs for Phase One OOaQIis1IKJ Tracts 13566-1 arc] 3 plus 24th Street fsam Wamhnan Bullock Road tc l3terry Avenue are Potmd to be of specific benefit to all property within the District in acmrdence with the following relations: Total Annual Coat (Section 4) _ $70,896.10. as °~~,.,~.•;~ Units SummaLy U4.+ nm"~+.e+.f trnl*anlnir namamrrt rr"i ra IIwe11Lx3 Units 113 I 113 7URYti. ASSESSl4Slf VNTTS 113 Assessment Fate = $70,896.10 + 113 $627.40 Effective Assea~Its 113 per y~r ar $52.28 par month per dwelllt7g unit Other Developed Lard iJses = NONE Estimated as are for ColfQari.4M only. Actual a=~~••• will ba sat by public hearing eadi year in .Tune and will be based m octal ma;,.re.u,nra expenses and developed lard use su®aries. e. n-nplete District Maintenance costs for the entire distixct are feud to be of specific benefit to all property within the District in aocoxdanoe with the following relations: land Use Assas®ent. Thuts ~r'Y Assessmplft Res Ofell t 1 t Asses~rnt Unite ~ land Use Units rn,irsrtn,ir th» _ uellirg Units 5,346 1 5,346 Other lard [TSes (e.g. marercial, iiutitu~iuuil wu w•. v. 2 UI1ii23%Hf41Yl 1W 3VRL ASS6347Tf DI1i75 5,506 Assessnent Rates = $3,146,029 5,506 $571.38 Effective Assesrmwertts 5,506 per year ar $47.62 per month per dwelling unit Other Developed Land Uses NOME Estimated assesaeenTs are for ocmpariaen only. Acttal asses®rent will be set by public hearitg 2ac3r year ir1 Jwta and will ba based an actual aiairrtenarcE expenses and developed letd use aumanriae. EXHBIT 'A' ASSESr61ENT D!P.SaPAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.7 TRACT NO3. 13568-1 8 13566-3 _'- cucgrra ~f' 2 i o ~ ;~ } z ., v~ ~! -..-.._ l 9~~~ 'I ate, ''s yb s ~,~ .~. ~. ~. ~i': i,~n~~~!, it ~i~il~ l: •~ (a ~~' ~u I+ u ~,~ -III ~~ •r i- •~ 1 ~ I ,~'I l1i ~~ I ~~~ ~.:,~'.( ..vas = -_ _ L~~ -1 EXHBIT 'A' p~gc,~EN'I' gpGRAM I LANDSCAPE MANTENANCE DISTRICT N0.7 TRACT NOS. 13566-1 3 13586-3 i i , :~ Gu.S?~V~_ a ,l o ti I; >z U t t ---F~~. !7~ y~~~ '6, ~~S y6 S -'- ,I ~ 1,1.1 , ~, I ~ I, I,~ ~: ~~ i'~'I I_~I~I' 1, li ~~l-~~- , _ ~,,LC .~ . i. :,~,~:: ,,~ r, :: r~•r~E`i; r.. I ~ :_L-ems ,L' .u d~~ 3^ N =~ ..., -~ EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAf~~ {t I -- t ;~Z { ~`i iss i~ i TRACT .~~~ ___~~_~:~ r,~o 7'_°"c stain-"o'.; vCE -___ ~-.,:,-=aasCE 13566-i & 13566-1 C1T! 01 ~A1fCl10 CQCAY0110A ~y~~L COUIi'P>< OI MI/ 81Qi1A1~II'W ^ -- EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM _~.rosc.ar~ r~~F,vr=_n,r:c=_ oisr~icr .:o. _ TRACT ~ ~~~~ r7Jti7 aR7 C,.e 1.',Af!:Cc SA'. __ •~ "".,:,.:,-:,,;v~_ 13566-1 & 13566-3 C!L'! O>- >RIIrC80 CCCJ11LO1KiA \'~~ COUl1'P>r O! SAl1 D1alfAtDII~fO ^ ._-- 3 L. ~ ~~~. ~ ~,-~,>~»,- N -~„= EXHIBIT "A" ?,SS~SS^.',=NT DIAGR~~A _...:~SCArc !.1 .-.',ATE`: =.tiC= D'~.STRICT VO. 7 ,~ a z Q ~~ 13366 ~~~~ Z m. Gt O SPP u G~ ~Q,P 24TH STREET WARDMAN BULLOCK RD. '~ '`_-~~~~~ =,~~-= TO CHERRY AVE. CPPT 0~ L1NCS0 CtTCAl101N'iA ~ - s~~\: OOVMT 01 an>x 31a1fAtDII~10 ~. E]pQHTT n8n r~-ar. DksaezPlza ~'[SQ+FE lOEIJRVAEKY DIStRICr ] :FLEE FOIS'IRS OF 46 HfST W1[F OF IHE FAST kQIF OF SFLTIQi 2~, SPN ~AADII10 liERIDIPN, IIl II1E CRY OF PANaIJ QI@lf2LA, aL'Nl`.-' OF SAN ~IQAFtDLA, SDATE 'JF ~ISFtIdIIA, IOCEItBR F'I'.N ,I' R, 1RACE W. 2418, AS PER DAP FIID III 9'at( I3, PACE 60 OF !TPS, :F SAID CDLTRY, ASS, u 91JId4 Q! A kRP FIIE] uN tJJDN ]J, PXSS 39 AND 40 OF ~ OF SLRJEY. ~ OF SAID COLTIfY, CFSfftIZgD u FOLIL4S: 9FLIIdSL`.G AT '.}ff NOfIIf'A'F5I CC43ff52 CF SAID fiE$I FWIF: Thl.`1CE WFGt1 99' : :5" FAST 1126. iJ FF3T 'O IfiE FAST L^1E GF SAID WFS: FAIR: .:III F0.^.H ~' .9 _. 'n'FSI 1511. GO FF£i AI<NG SAiD EAST ~E; ^R2KZ :Jff :OtSLWIIJC GLRSFS: .. *:~; a a: ~ :cz+-^v~r. '. iWf PACIt5 •COR.R :}A: LS~52NT.SR M'6'1FRI:l, A RADIAL :O SALD PCI:+E DVS SHIN 89' JJ' 52" FAST: 2. :URi}QRLY 4.0] FEED AILNG SAFD CUFC/E 'tHfhlt%ii A CFNRiAL A.ND1E OF 3 :9' 0>": J, 'l[N~t4'EI~Il' MIQH 89' 43' S9" k1SI 50.00 FEET N A. It3LYI CN A:Li.'-:A`lGIII: 16]5.08 £W[ PADIIS CRVE lYAT L CCtJCAVE WESIERI:1, A RADIAL N S,liD eY•Pl: f?fT~ SCVRI 89' dl' S9" FAST; 1. SCl/1EQ.Al.Y 21.21 FFJ.1' AIBG SAiD CL'FNE 'Ik4U1GN A CF.YRW. ANGSE OF 0' S3' J2^: 5, MH-TJWGFSEF MAUH 86' JJ' OB" WF_^aI 198.42 Fgl'; 6. SCVIN 83' Ol' 09" WESC 1]1. J8 FEEE: "/. NCRRt 89' 41' S9" NFET 1]0.00 FEET: 9. IICRIEt >o' 26' 49" W9F 90.06 FEET: 9. SQIl}I 8]' 2]' 46" WFST 85.11 Et£f; 10. SOVIN 9B' 15' S^ Wf3C 205.92 FFFSt ii. :LAlIH BS' 2J' ]J" WESL 25.00 ktPa' 'lU A lVllil r.M n M11~tArw.erva awv.w ;WE FADIIS CJRVE 1EAT IS ~1CAVE FISTFALY, A MDIAL iO SAID PJIIlE REVS 9Q/a1 B5' 2J' J]" WFSE: :2. SQ/IEff•AI.Y 20.29 fE£C ALWG SAID Q.'RJE 'hOS.I%N A CQt[SNL A21GIE OF 0' S2' 1]": ll. scViN 84' 41' le" bfST 25.00 kEEt; 14. IICim1 B9' 4]' 19" NEST 155.86 FE£E Sb 'IfiE NEST LINE OF SAID WEST fAIF OF 'll{E F1SE /OUR: 'hIQAT lLIIIH 0' 16' dl" FAST 1611.82 EF£f Af121G SAID NF_SC LI16 ~ 1!tE FOLYI CF E¢IiIMII2A. /..h-`\ . .'L/4'~~.%_/i!/.~--" '> 4TH .. '0.W+35 E. QJVIO~, L.S. ]118 F](PIAATICN pAJE: v^TtE J0, 1992 I .= vs ! • ., _ ~. o., ~~ /. G-2dd 44z. D2o1 5/l0/B9 E#®TT "B^ L4;AI. [tS~iIP1'LCTI LWfbO1PE l4.III1FSAti~ DLSRtICL J I1fSE RHI'ICNB OF 1}tE WEST W:IF OF 1HE EASL FYIF OF SkX.'iTON 27, SAN PFIdIAADIIA MFASDWI, II! 1}IE CLIY OF PANOD Q%TILN.^A, OJIRAY OF SAN ®LAPDBA, SLA1E OF ^AtSFVd4LA, 1RTE1I4R WtTY. mil' B. '1PI C1' !q. 2418 AS PEIE !WP FSIID II1 BOOK 34, PAGE SB OF NAPS, 1F SAID D71M1Y, ALL AS SFAH4 R! A MAP FIIID M BCOK 7J, PA65 J9 AND GO OF AECYPD OF SURVEY, [~ OF SALD ODfRI1Y, DF5QiI® AS FOLIlA4S: ~GIIVILNG AT 1f1E NCFIIMF.9L ~YdlER CF SAID WEST F4:IF: T}D21CE NOIII11 09' 41' S5" EAST 1]26. SJ FEEL 10 1IIE EASE LINE OF SAID WESI WIIF; THFN~ sanni 0' 18' Ol" WFST 1611.OC FEEL AIf1G SAID EAST tII4E; 1}Q•21fi 1HE FOLLOWING ¢LR56: i. iw.L}+ a -' 3 ITEL :' .. 1C.^.': ~] A :R: yY`IiW F. FCOl FADIIS yNRVE INN' IS~oZMAVE W61IIUY, A PADW. TO SAID POLYL lffAFS B0JRI 89' JJ' S2" E0.Sf: 2. IAFAfffRI.Y 4.02 FEED ALT4G SAID CIRiVE '66CA)(~1 A CEtt1FAL AlGiE OF 0' OB' 00"; ). Nt'1YCNiGQIP NUHIH 89' 41' S9" WESP 50.00 FEET i0 A PJIN1' CY! A NJN-TTNGII+L 16'/5.08 FOOL FADItL OfiVE I1IAT LS CUKTVE W6TIIII.Y, A PADIAL 10 SAID FYSINf ~1P5 SaIIH 89' 41' S9" FAST; 4. SOLTHERIY 21.21 FEEL AiLW SAID Q1R^T TIQYIAI A @1INAI. ANGLE OF 0' SJ' 12"; 5. MYYI'ANrF17L 1GIIH 86' JJ' 08" WFSC 198.42 FEEL; 6. SOAR eJ' Ol' 09" WtSL ll1. J8 FF£L; 7. HOIIIH 89' 41' S9" WSL 1]0.00 FEEL; B. F1orali ]0' 26' 49^ N6f 90.04 FEEL: 9. SOU1H 87' 2J' 46" WESL 85.11 FEEt; 10. SNifi 88' 15' 09" FFSf 205.92 FFEL; 11. SQA}1 85' 2J' 33" NESP 25.00 FF1; I' 10 A FDINL ON A MN~li1M;hN1' 16~U. UV FOOL PALtl[S OIRVE TfPT LS CONCAVE EAShW.Y, A AADIAL IO SAID PoII•T {SAPS SQ/IH 85' 2J' ll" W6SC; 12. SOVRQ~ALY 20.29 rl£I AIl].G SAID QIRVE TNIII2A31 A PAPAL h"IGIE OF 0' 42' ll"; 1J. FAVL11 86' 61' 16" WFSl' 25,00 FF£C; 16. N.11flli 89' 4J' 19" WFSC 155.06 FELT 10 I}[E W6T LINE GF SAiD WL'SC FTIF OF 'I}LE EASE HALF; TNF2XE tARI}4 0' 16' 41" FASL 16]1.82 FFF.1' AILf~ SAID WESC LINE 'N '1HE IDTM' OF ~ItU4ING. _ e~w ~_ ~ HAPRIS E. COIA~~~ L.S. ]318' ", E%PIPATICN p41E: JUNE ]0, 1992 i v' ' " ~ ~i < \}` q.f+/ ~\ IG 244 042.0201 5/10,•89 EXHIBIT "C" _ ~im~µ~~ s' ~m ~~ ....1 --- _ ~~uu~_ . _ _ Nx~w~--~....'.~ __ _ x------- -- ~--_ ~~ -- - _ ~ - ~' _`~ I ~ ~ _ - ~D#~ ... ,~+ ~'1 ~..'iauu - ' I ~ ' 1 i~ 'z ,~u. ~t - 1- - `~ r ti~ / '-" _ _ rte= -~_:{'"~ f f.~ .-.z _ ~'_ _ _ _ .. ~'~ 1L'.A. :,TI ~.- H A .77.9 - CYY?.:.1: ._~. ~Sl~n %hti~ y ~' RESOLUTION N0. R 9~ d~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 WHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Sec tior. 22500) of the California Strnet5 R Highways Cede auth^rizes this ri.y r~,n~:, to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improve and maintain landscape located therein; and WHEREAS, this City Council declares to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 to improve and maintain landscaping located within the boundaries of said Landscape Maintenance District. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby proposes the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTICN 2: The nature, location and extent of the improvements to be insta ie and-maintained with "Landscape Maintenance District No. 7"are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: The loca tlon and extent of Landscape Maintenance District ~re particularly desc r?bed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and the City Council hereby specifies that designation "Landscape Maintenance District No. 7" for said landscape maintenance district. SECTION 4: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to cause t e preparation and filing of a report with respect to the formation of Landscape Maintenance District in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565! of Chapter 1 of the California Streets 8 Highways Code. i RESOLUTION N0. ~ 9- ~~'v`' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIYING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY EN!:I NEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. WHEREAS, on May li, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho ;ga directed the Cay rngi^ecr to Take ^d fil= vet th the ray Cl=•k ^f said~Ci ty a report in writing as required Dy the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has Deen presented to this Council for consideration; and NHE REAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE the Ct ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized casts and expenses o~f sai work and of the incidental expenses in connacti on therewith, contained in said report 6e, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and ccnfi rmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and de sc r._e ,n ;aid report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa id~sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said reDOrt shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for tie purposes o' all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. ~1 ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~' ~.--] A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, on May 17, :989, this City Council adopted Resolution No. 89 `~ proposing the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape improvements to be located within said assessment district; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 1989, this City Council preliminary approved an Engineer's Report with respect to said "Landscape Maintenance District No. 7" and caused said Engineer's Report to be filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 for the maintenance of certain landscape improvements to be located herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby declares its intention to order the formation of an assessment district to he known as "Landscape Maintenance 07strict No. 7" for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape improvements therein and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Liah tiny .4ct of 1972. SECTION 2. The landscape imy rove,^ents t^_ be maintained within Lhe boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 are more particularly de sc ri6ed on Exh161t A" attached hereto an6 incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. The general location of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 is more particularly described on the diagram attached as "Exhibit B" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4, Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report an file with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a full detailed description of the bounds rtes of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and of land within said assessment district. SECTION 5. This City Council hereby sets the date, time and place of a public hearing on the formation of landscape Maintenance District No. 7 to be as follows: DATE: June 21, 1989 TIME: 7:30 pm PLACE: City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~b - CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA _~~~ STAFF REPORT ~~ BATE: May 17, 1989 T0: Mayor and Mellbers of the City Council ~' FRQA: Brad Buller, City Planner B'f: Jeff Gravel. Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS - - - request to amen ~ acres o t e eve opment stn cts Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), 1 aaLed approximately 600 feet south of Lemon Avenue, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue on the east side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-252-41. I. RECOMMENDATION; On April 12, 1989, the Planning Conmission recomner~i e~that the Developaient District paerdment 89-01 be approved by the CTty Council, If the City Cau ncil concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of approval would be appropriate. ii. ont,riGic~u iu: un rcuruary ii, iioi, :ile vi ~y Cuu rti ii apprvveu Ge ~e~~Tan Pme ndment 89-O1C. This General Plan Me ndment wes a measure first In;r iar~n .,y the olsnnil_Ig Commission on Dec enter 28, 1988 to promote the consistency between the 6e ne ral Plan and Development Districts Map. From that process, one parcel still remained inconsistent between the two maps. The purpose of this Development Districts Amendment is to follow-up General Plan Amendment 89-O1C and make the subject parcel consis Lent between the two maps. III. FPCTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the conclusions listed in the a tac a ann ng omission staff report of April 12, 1989, and Planning Conmission Resolu*.ion No. 89-050, the City Council can make the following findings regarding this application: 1, IIIC lalallge VI La IN U>e Ue~lgnatl Vll I) 1U ILab1C lV the aR'a IO regards to access and circulation. 2. The site is conpatible with the surrounding land uses aM consis Lent with goals and objectives of the City's General Plan, ~5 ~ CITY CQI NC IL STAFF REPORT ODA 89-01 -CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA May 17, 1989 Page 2 The proposed amendment will not have adverse environmental impacts upon the surrou ndirg areas. IY. CORRESPOIDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in'-T1-ie 6a~y Ifeport newspaper, and notices sent to property owners wit iF'n-360--feet of~he project site. the City Council concurs with the recomre relation of the mnission for approval of Oevelopme nt Districts Pme ndme nt adoption of the attached Ordinance would be appropriate. Brad B ler City Tanner BB: JG :mlg Attachments: Development Districts Map/General Plan Map Planning Commission Minutes of April 12, 1989 Planning ComnfssTOn Re solution No. 89-050 nmira rv;p ~/5g -~ i i rl i i~ ~~ -~ • L. MfiLA1~ :y'Hlt! . - L `` L =LOW RESIDENTIAL 2-4 DU'S PER ACRE VCKTH L~ =LOW-N~DIUM RESIDENTIAL 4-8 DU'S PER ACRE M =M!ED'AfM I3€SID€NTIAL $.14 [Sle PER .at1R= • LM GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION `~\~'~~~ (~ + ~,~(~,~ O~fy~~ DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AMENDMENT 8901 R ~1. til et/ 1, l.~"li'^~ `~R ~ T~T•L.E' DE Y~~OPMENT DISTRICTSGENERAI PLAN MAP P1_.~..\til,,iG D(~"l~V EXHI~T': a ~~ NONE _ y59 i -~ ~- , L LEMON N/ENI~ .L V ~; L =LOW RESDENTIAL 2-4 DItS PER ACRE ~10R'T}i LM =LOW-IiAED1UIM RESIDENTIAL 4-8 Dll3 PER ACRE M =~ui nE3iD'einTidL te-ia u'v`S r'ER Aar Cl~ a' R~~ DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AMENDMENT 8901 ftA.'VC'HO (~Al~~ 1'Ti1.E: DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP P[:4ti'iV(iVG D(VLS10lY F~(H[!I<I` A SCALE NONE ~/lOo ...~. n Avenue, Sutte E. Tom Grah sistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNi erred the public hearing. use, John Marquez, Ge Manager, asked if it would be po a to expand the n_f 1he Pe <nlil in al 1Qy anfor fa inure of eny t of LhP wE ek dnd during happy hour ti so that ;f they shout sh to provide such entertainment in the fu to ey would not have to y fora new permit. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how business wa r the bar only. Mr. Marquez stated that 25% of th reve s from alcohol related sales. He estimated that perhaps 15% of th ess was bar only. He said they proposed no dancing and no cover charge Hearing no further testimony, the p he g was closed, Commissioner Ch itiea stated s suppor ~d a ing music any night and removing the limit on hours. a stated they not prcposing any uses which she felt would bring i undesirable elemen Commissioner Tolstoy ag Chairman Mc Niel sta at he °.,.,-.o^°d the center a n entertainnent complex. He was opposed to ^expansion of the hours, ggestin9 that ~neiiy ~s may wish lave music, uuriuy urm x. ii. Motion: Move y Ch itiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt th solution approving E tainment Permit 89-01, with modification to ve the restrictio hours and days. Motion carried by the following vo AYES: CCMMISSIO NER S: BL AK ESL EY, CH iTt EA, EMERICK, MC NIEL, TOL Si NOE COMAI SS IONER S: NONE T: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried x. FNV140 MIEN TAI ASSESSMENT AND OE VELOPMENT DISTRICTS AMENDMENT 89-01 - CITY ur HAM~HU I.UIPMUMiA - A request to amene i.o~ acres or the ueveiopment cs ric s map rom dium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located approximately 60C feet south of Lemon Avenue, 470 £eet north of Highland Avenue on the east siAe of Archibald Avenue - APN: 201-252-41. ~l arming Commissicn Minutes -15- April 12, 1989 ~w I Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Terri Brooks, 10331 Orange Street, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if a li oht would be installed at the intersection of Lemon and Archibald. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated a light was planned and would probably be finder constn~ction in December. hiearng no further testimony, the publi: 'nearng was closed. Commissioner Ch itiea felt that in the interest of consistency the Ame ndire nt should be adopted. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstay, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and Oevel opment Districts Amendment 89-01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COhMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHI TI EA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: CCMMISS IO NERS: NONE ABSENT: COh4d ISS TONERS: NONE -carried + .. « . sale of nan7 liquor tar an-slte can;umpt~on ac rei~pe s, an ez Esc tau rant of 2,360 ;Guare feet an B5 acres of land in the Co ial District of the Foothill Soul eva rd Specific Plan (S 3), i~ r6c M:llo. c nu toner ~cntar at An17 Arr hihald - APN• :017-6 ~y nthia ''{loser, A t Planner, presented the staf rt, as well as a let t=_r from an employe nearby shoo opposing t e of hard liquor. Cnairman Mc .4iei opened the pu ring. Felipe Oelap iedra, applicant, stated a family restaurant. Cnairman Mc Niel asked if he p increase ors of operation. Mr, ;el spied ra stated d possibly i~z rea se his h the summer. :;nnmirioner asked for comment regarding the letter 'e nearby ~lanr;rS :n ^missin^~ Mi nu tr_s -'.'- April 12, :989 y ~' ('; RESOLUTION N0. 89-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-01, REQUESTING TO MIEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL {8- 14 OWELLI NG UNITS PER ALRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4- 8 OWELLI NG UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 1.65 ACRES OF LANG LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 600 FELT SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE, 470 FEET NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE EAST' SIDE OF ARCHIBALD A.VEMUE, RANCHO CUCAMONiA, CA.Li FORM A, ANO MAKING FTU0INGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-252-41 A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application far Development District pnenOnent No. 89-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amen Anent is referred to as "the application". (ii) On April 12, 1489, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) A11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. _ N_OM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Y411 (l lly WII, III ~)IUII UI I.IIC LI Ly VI I,G IILIIV LVLUIINIIy4 Ui IVIIN,i. I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 1.65 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located approximately 600 feet south of LeAOn Avenue, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue on the east side of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently desiana ted as Medium Residential; and ~/~3 PLANNING COMMIS~.N RESOLUTION ND. 89-50 RE: ENV. ASSESS: d DDA 99-01 April 12, 1989 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low-Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low Residential and is existing single family residential. The property to the east is designated Low-Medium Residential and is existing single family residential. The property to the south is designated Low-Medium Residential and is existing single family residential. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Ptan zed with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant i~act on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the propesed district in teens of access, size, and compatibility ..,ifh n 'e*i na lanA uen in +ha enrrOn n~R nn area! alld (b) That the proposed amendnent would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amen Anent is in conformance with the General Pian. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to section 6 ~BbD t0 6[4y; ni inn rwalife rnia is eV nrrmnnt inrio that tho Gi a,n,n,i ng i.mm~i, cc{nn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of April, 1989, of Development District Amen Anent 89-01 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. . . ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION R~,LUfION N0. 89-50 RE: ENV. ASSESS. d DDA 89-01 Aprtl 12, 1989 Page 3 , APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989. BY AT I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMFIT SSIONERS; BLAKE SLEY, CHI TIEA, EME RI CK, MLNIEL, TULSTOY NOES: COFMISSIONERS: NONE A65ENi: CGMMi SSiGNERS: NUKE ~~ PLANNING COFtAI SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDINANCE N0. 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CCU NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM ONGA, LPLIFORNI A, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENRAENT N0. 89-01, AMENDl NG 1.65 ACRES OF THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTS AL (8-14 DNELLI NG UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW -M ED AM RES IDENTI AI. (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SCU TH OF LEMON AVENUE, 470 FEE! NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCH IBALD AVENUE, PND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals (i) On April 12, 1969, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga condic tail a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development District Pmendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 89-050, thereby rec omne riling that the City Council adopt Development District Pme ndnent No. 89-01. (if) On May 11, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga condre tail a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. (iii? A.1T legal prereguis ites prior to *_he adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 0. Ordinarce. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: Section 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set or in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been rev~ewe~and considered in corryliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Courcfl hereby issues a Negative Declaration, Section 3; The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: fal Tha uih_jwrt prnnarty is u~itah la for thn gw< na_rmitteA in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and coop atibt lily with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) The proposed District change would not have significant adverse irryacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) The proposed amendment is to conformance with the General Plan. ~~~ CITY COUNCIL ORD IN ANLE No. DDA 89-01 May 11, 1989 Page 2 , Section 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves eve opment District Aire ndment 89-01 cha ngi rg the district designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located 600 feet south of Lemon Aveme, 470 feet north of Highland Avenue on the east side of Arch ibaid Avenue. Section 5: (ne City Lierk shaii certify the adoption of this Ordinance awn sTiaTl cause the same to be Dublished within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City oT ntar-O~TiTornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17 day of May, 1989. ~-/'~ / ---- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May i7, 1989 T0: Mayor and Meyers o' the City Council FRCM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bra tt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CR 89-02 DR PFT SAN BERNAPDI NO Cp1NTY HAZARDOUS WASTE - request y t e ounty or ,ty approv-aT~-tie plan for the monitoring, handling, reduction, treatment, transportation, and disposal of hazardous wester materials in San Bernardino County in conformance with A82948 ITanner). I. REC OMMEtaAT10 N: Staff recommends approval of the San Bernardino ounty za ous Waste Management Plan. A Resolution of Approval is attached. ::. BACKGROU!!i,': The Cou.^.ty Deparine nt of Environmental Health Services aFi s c~eted the draft plan and requests City Council consideration of the plan before June 1, 1989. City consideration is concurrent with consideration of plan approval by the County 8aard of Supervisors. If the Plan is approved by the local jurisdictions, it will be forwarded to the State for review. After the S*_a to approves the plan, Cities will have six months (180 days) to Tmplement the plan. Implementation actions by the City are anticipated to occur between January and July of 1990. Those actions may require a General Plan PmeMme nt, as well as adoption of orrlinance s. On May 10, 1989, the Planning Commission previewed the Draft Plan for informational purposes only. During the 1990 implementation phase, the Planning Commission must review the adopted plan and recomnerd actions of implementation. However, no Planning !`~,nnleeinn arf Vnn le rwq~i,aA dt this Timor, (~na at tar hed Staff Re porti. On February 16, 1988, the City Council reviewed the preliminary draft of the County Hazardous Waste Management plan. "l rP CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CR 89-02 -HAZARDOUS wA STE PLANS May 17 , 1989 Page 2 The executive summary of the revised plan is attached, Important changes in the revised plan are discussed in the analysis section of this staff report. iII. ANALYSIS: The County Hazardous Na ste Management Plan provides a comp re tfensive plan for the management of hazardous waste. The most controversial portion of the plan is siting criteria for regionai hazardous waste facilities. The plan also provides for the monitoring, haMli ng, reduction, treatment, and transportation of hazardous waste materials in San Bernardino County. The plan also distf nguishes between on-site treatment and off-site treatment of hazardous materials. The siting criteria in the plan applies to off-site •reatment facilities and are in Le riled for regional treatment facilities, that is, fora very high intensity Land use suitable to very limited areas. fie siting criteria section is of special interest to the City, because the plan identifies heavy industrial zones countywide for consideration for the location of hazardous waste treatment facilities and because the City has a heavy industrial zone, Subarea 15, in the industrial Spxific Plan. The following sections of the Plan should be noted; (charges made per State comments on the preliminary draft are tnatcatea to parenthesis): o The land use section of the plan destgnabes areas zoned for heavy industrial use throughout the County as suitable for siting of hazardous waste trea the nt facilities (previously, a criteria overlay map indicated that few sites in the County would be suitabie for waste treatnent facilities(. The plan requires that a risk assessment be completed for any facility near to an immobile population (previously, the plan excluded facilities from a one mile radius of an immobile population). The rriUrTa dverlav map was revved from the plan (previously the overiyv map exc ~iuded the Rancho Cucamonga Heavy in austriai Area at City request based on the lmaoblle population criteria and based on City development sUrdards in ISP Subarea I5. ')' 1'i CITY CQI NCfI. STAFF REPORT CR 89-02 -HAZARDOUS HASTE PLANS May 11 , 1909 Page 3 The authority of Cities under AB2948 (Tanner) was clarified by SB477 (Greene) which states that after a County plan is approved, cities within a county mAy adopt more restrictive standards for land use approvals. (See attached staff report to the Planning Commission, May 10, 1988). Therefore, during the implementation phase of the County Dlan, the City mAy adopt aDD ropria to conditions to the issuance of any land use approval for a hazardous waste facility necessary to protect public health. Prior to implementation, staff will review conditions necessary to protect the health and safety of the immobile population which will be housed at the West Valley Detention Center located in the vicinity of Fourth Street and Etiwa nda Avenue and recomiend appropriate criteria and sta rdards. IV. ENVIROMiENTAL: The County of San Bernardino is the lead agency for env ro-~nmen~aT review of the San Bernardino Canty Hazardous Waste Management Plan. The County has prepared an Environmental Impact Report for the plan vhich will be certified by the County Board of Supervisors. No environmental action 1s required by the City until implementation measures for the plan are adopted. V. CONCLUSION: Under AB29g8 (Tanner) approval of the plan is required y~5'0 percent of the Cities fn the County representing 50 percent of the population in the County. Approval of the San "oernardino County Hazardous Na ste Management Plan is recommended, because it is a comprehensive plan for the management of hazardous wastes, and also because approval of the Canty plan enables the city to control standards for facility siting. If the City Council agrees with the staff recomne relation, the attached Resolution of Approval should be adopted, Res lly submi d, i ~ i i.v ~' / B~f• City Pl ner ~B:MB:mlg ~7b CITE CdI NC IL STAFF REPORT CR 89-02 - MAZAAOOUS WASTE PLIWS May 17, 1989 Page 4 Attachments: Staff Report to the Planning Executive Summary of the San Hazardous Waste Management Resolution of Approval Co mnission, May 10, 1988 Bernardino County Plan / ~/ ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT 'r`~~y , DATE: May 30, 1989 ~ ~', T0: Chairman and Me nbers of the Planning Commission ~i FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner '~ 8Y: Miki Bra tt, Associate Planner ~, SUBJECT: CR 89-02 DRPFT SAN BERNARDI NO CCUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE ~~ - reques y e oun y or ty approval o-f--l:Tie plan for the monitoring, handling, ', reduction, treatment, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waster materials in San Bernardino County in conformance with AB2948 (Tanner). , i. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is to provide the Planning omm ss on with information about the proposed Draft County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (see attached Executive Summary). No action is requi red by the Planning Commission at this tine. However, actions will be required during 1990 to implement Lhis plan, iI. BACKGROU I/D: The County Department of Environmental Health rev ci-es~ias completed the draft plan and requests City Council consideration of the Plan before June 1, 1989, Consideration of the Plan is scheduled for public hearing by the City Lau ncii on May 17, 1989, Approval 6y the Cities is concurrent with approval by the County Board of Supervisors. if the plan is approved, it will be forwarded to the State far review. After the State approves the plan, cities will have sfx months (180 days) to do one of the following: 1. incorporate the applicable portions of the approved County Plan, by reference, into the City General Plan; 2. Enact an ordinance or ordinances implementing the County Plan within the Citr 3. Adopt a City Hazardous Naste Management Plan containing all the elements required by the Tanner Act and which is consistent with the approved Plan. y ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CR 89-02 HAZARDOUS NASTE MPNAGEMENT PLAN May 30, 1989 Page 2 Implementation actions by the City are anticipated to occur between da nuary and duly of 1990. Those actions may require a General Plan pnerdment, as well as adoption of ordinances. The Planning Commission will be asked to review and implement the applicable portions of the plan as part of the implementation tier of actiUns in early 1990. III. ANALYSIS: Until a County Plan is approved, the State retains auLiioriEy for siting hazardous waste facilities. Plan approval has the effect of transferring standards for siting hazardous waste facilities from the State to the local jurisdiction. An approved plan enables cities within a county to adopt more restrictive sta rdards for land use approvals, specifically: (Legislation) does not limit the authority of any City to attach appropriate conditions to the issuance of any land use approval for a hazardous waste facility in order to protect the public health, safety, or welfare, and does not limit the authority of a city to establish more stringent olanni na ream rements er siting criteria than those specified in the county hazardous waste management plan. (AB477, Health and Safety Cade Section 25135.7). Consistency: During the implementation tier of actions, cons i-sue'between the Canty Plan and City Development Standards will be addressed, Consistency is an example of the kind of issue which must be resolved after a county plan is approved, Under the consistency rule of the state legislation, the Rancho Cucamonga heavy industrial land use area would be included within the County's plan. However, although heavy industry is a permitted use in Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 15, the in bensity of use associated with a regional hazardous waste treatment fac 111 ty is not permitted. The plan anticipates siting of large scale treatment facilities wii i~h t, uuid be iaia bed irr areas in the Cuuri ty [oiled fur heavy industrial use, provided that all the siting criteria developed in the plan are met. City siting criteria mare restrictive than County standards may be adopted by City action after the plan is approved. Nhile Canty siting criteria requires a risk assessment when an immobile T PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CR 89-02 HAZARDOUS WASTE MIWAGEMENT PLAN May 10, 1989 Page 3 , population is located near a proposed facility, the City may choose to exclude any treatment facility within a one mile radius of an immobile population. For exanple, ISP Subarea 15 includes an immobile population which will 6e housed at the West Yalley Detention Center near 4th Street and Et iwa nda Avenue. (See Exhibit "A" and "B"1. IV. CONCLUSION: The County Hazardous Water Management Plan mist be appr~-before City actions to implement the plan can occur. During the implementation tier of actions, the Planning Commission will review the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan and recommend implementation measures to the City Council. The implementation phase is expected to occur between Ja nua~y a M July 1990. Re sp lly u tte , Br e City anner BB:MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Dne Mile Radrus Map Executive Summary u~~ I i _'_ T-- - ~-,: ~ - ~, .y .. ,~- ~.I- ~ 9 - _ _~: _ _ ~~- T yy W. /"~~ r ~. / I I r4Y J1 ~ I ~~ I . ' ' - - z ~t ~ - .? ice- ~i l1 _ y . _ ~ITM~Or . ~ \ -~ ' '---• - ~ i _ ~~ I -~ ! ~ _ • _ ~~~ r-t ~~'~~ . / ~ ~ ~,Vn(isrR/nL S°EC;F,'C ~'A,V ~.. SUL3A,E'EA l5 ~ ~~ VOR'iH ~~ ~ IT'Etit: R.-~.'~C'f-i~J CLC-~1t0!\GA 7~.E: RAAI,"HD " AA,10N A V' /A,~ITY P1-A:~i:~l'VG DI~~I$10N F_KHIBfT ~ SGLE _NOA/E ~~~ 2 SUBAREA 15 C COMMERCIAL \~ HAVEN OVERLAY \~~ DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL PARK ® GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MINIMUM IMPACT ~~ HEAVY INDUSTRIAL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INDUSTRIAL AREA PLAN V ~lxYf H CITE' (~' lTE1,: tau-~rT~rrUs RA:~CE-IfJ CL.~.~1~K. ,~Cu~ Tom: SSP SUBAKEA 15 I'LA.'~:~il~iG DID LSION / / EkHI&T _ ••~~~SC.4LE NONE Y ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Revised Draft) ~~~ l ~~~ ~~ ~ ~s :,d~~~ ~- MARCH 1484 DEPAR"TMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES Y~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZAP.DOU5 WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (ftcviscd Draftj March 1989 Tht information contained herein is a summary of each oC the chapters in the Couaty of San Bernardino Reviud Draft Hazardous Waste Management Plaa (CHWMP). The goals and policies/actions are presented in entirety after each chapter summary. Chapter 2 has no recommended goals or politics, rvhile Chapter 14 includes a recommended schedule for implementation of CHWMP programs. ~~ S CHAPTER 1 INTR ODUC't'ION Proper hazardous waste management constitutxs one of the state's major environmental concerns. Statewide recognition of the need for better methods of hazardous waste management came about by the intense media attention on improper disposal practices. Hazardous ehemiwls play an important role in our modern society. They contribute to the manufacture of a vast array of consumer products (i c, tNevisiens, cemp~!!cr=, automobiles, and medicines) and the convenience of consumer services (i.e., dry cleaners, automotive repair). While these goods and services add to our duality of life, they also caul: the gcnvation of hazardous waste. Reducing our reliance on hazardous materials would reduce the generation of waste. Hazardous waste will continue to be generated, however, since some materials have no substitutes. For this reason, a comprchensicc plan is necessary to identify and promote progrnms for the reduction of hazardous waste and the sale management of wastes that rcmnin after treatmcn[ or recycling. AB 2948 (Chapter 1504, Statutes of 19fi6) and amending legislation SB 477 (Chapter 1167, Statutes of 1987), AB 3206 (Chapter 1389, Statutes of 1988), AB 3209 (Chapter 378, Statutes of 1988), and AB 34 (bending), recognized the need to have a comprehensive program for management of wastes by authorizing cou n[ics to develop a local hazardous waste management plan. The law has as its goals: the safe and responsible management of hazardous waste; and state governments, the public, and private industry; and the prevention of permanent hazardous waste disposal into the land or emission in the air without first processing the waste by an economically and technically feasible alternative technology. On March 31, 1987 the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors authorized the preparation of the Coun[y Hazardous Waste Manage men[ Plan (CH W'MP). A resolution was adopted and sent to the Smte Depa rtmcnt of Health Services specifying the County's desire to Drcpare the CIi W'MP. The Plan is consistent with state law and the Guidelines (or Preparation of Hazardous Was[e Management Plans prepared 6y the Department of Health Ser: ices, June 1987. A 1Ir1:11 f_n__nV n_: 1_I,_n_ 1__H_W_rN__V m it_I 1_, n_ a~, F_m,lln,1 In IFe f•n 1.1'n~n:n rln..n.~.n.n• , ~ ......~. .. .... ~~........... .-. w...n.u• of Health Services (DHS) by June I, 1989. State law specifies that [hc CHWMP must be approved by a majority of the uities within the County which contain a majority of the population of the incorporated area of the County. Once the Plan has been approved by DHS, the County has 180 days from the date the DHS approves the CHWMP to incor borate applicable portions of the Plan by reference into the County's general ES-I 7 / plan, or coact an ordinance requiring all applicable zoning, subdivision, conditional use permit, and variantt decisions to be consistent with the CHWMP. t ne trues are also required by start law to adopt some form of a Hazardous Waste Management Flan, The law specifies that cities are required to do one of the following: 1) adopt a City Hazardous Waste Management Plan which is consistent with the CHWMP; 2) incorporate applicable portions of the CHWMP into th< city's general plan. or 3) crac+ a ^r^irante which regaires that 311 app!:cablt Zoning, subdivision. conditional use permit, and variance decisions to be consisi<nt with the applicable portions of the CHWMP. State law does not limit the city's authority to attach conditions to the issuance o(a land use application or to establish requirements or siting criteria different from those identified in the CHWMP. Any such conditions or criteria establ ishcd by a city must be substantiated as necessary to protect the public health and safety since th< conditiens Dr criteria may be app<aled to the State Appeal Board (SB 477, Chapter 1167, Statutes of 1987). the CH11'MP serves as [he primary planning document (or the management of hazardous waste in San Bernardino County. It is an element of the County's General Plan and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan. The CHWMP identifies the tyDCS and amounts of wastes generated in the County, establishes programs (or managing these wastes, identifies an application review process (or th< siting of specified hazardous waste facilities, identifies mechanisms for reducing the amount of waste generated in the County, and identifies goals and policies and actions for hazardous waste management. The CHWMP was prepared with full and meaningful involvement of the public. Information regarding the Counry'S ~n~~rvii' o,r .~ v~ .,~. - r, c..... ,~ ~- G, C1CG:cd in the discussion on public pa rtici pation,~ChaDtcr 13. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACT70N5 The County plan is intended to preserve the local land use process, protect the local en vironm<n t, and provide a framework for ensuring that needed facilities art sited. The following overall goals and policies/actions are the underlying goals used to develop the CHWMP, Goals G-1-1 To protect the health and welfare of the public, environment, and economy of San Bernardino County through a tom Drehensive program [hat ensures safe and responsible management of ., „ar,,.,,s .. a., c, ma,..~.... G-I-2 To reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated in the County by providing improved programs for hazardous waste source reduction and recycling. G-I-3 To ensure proper managemety of hazardous waste/material by identifying and encouraging safe and efficient methods for ES-2 Cog ~ managing hazardous waste/material and by providing for needed hazardous waste facilities in San Bernardino County. G-1-4 To Drevent hazardous waste from being permanently disposed into land, or emitted into the air without being processed by an economically and technically feasible alternative technology. G-I-S Tu involve the public, industry, and government in a comprehensive process that develops solutions for the management and disposal of hazardous waste. G-I-6 To establish a framework for the development o! San Bernardino County's share of hazardous waste facilities. G-1-7 To recognize that consumers contribute to the generation of hazardous waste, thus, limiting industrial growth is not an appropriate means of reducing the County's commitment in hazardous waste management. G-1-8 To encourage and develop Dublic education programs on the proper management and disposal of hazardous waste. Policies/Actions P/A-t-1 Because a need exists to augment current Drograms for the proper management of hazardous waste and to address recent legislation, this jurisdiction shall work with industry and the public in identifying safe and responsible solo:ions far the management and disposal of hazardous wastes. .rr.-.... ........~. ...~ ~.. ...... -vv.... ........, ..._-~ ..._ -...-...~ _.._ ..._ cities shall work together to prepare and update the CHN'MP as well as its implementing ordinances and to develop and implement programs which reduce the amount and toxicity of the hazardous waste generated in the County. P/A-I-3 Because the Southern California Hazardous Waste Management Authority (Authority) provides an appropriate forum for local input regarding the regional siting of hazardous waste (acilitics, this jurisdiction shall continue its participation in the Authority. P/A-I-4 Because Oropu hazardous waste management is one of the state's critical environmental concerns, the County and the cities shall work with the Authority and the state to address regional and statewide planning issues as necessary to achieve ~nln llv nA +911V PIIPf11VP 11P )A r/11lllC WA[fP -..... .......-...~..r ..~.... ..s management on a local, regional, and statewide basis ES-3 / V~ CHAPTER 2 EXISTING PROGRAMS FOR DEALING WITH HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND HAZARDOUS WASTES The County has several departments involved in hazardous material/waste programs: [he Environmental Health Services Department, the Fire Department, the Land Management Department, the County Agricultural Commissioner, the Solid Waste Management Department, the Fubiic Health Department, [he Sheriffs Office, and the District Attorney. Of these departments, the Environmental Health Services Department has responsibility for the majority of Drograms which deal with hazardous material and waste issues. The County Environmental Health Services Department (DENS) administers over eight programs related to hazardous waste and materiel management. Some of these Drograms include the generator permit Drogram, the underground storage tank program, the hazardous materials handler program, [he household hazardous waste collection program, radiological health, water hygiene, and land use and noise control. In addition, the DENS coordinates emergency response activities and, through its Air Pollution Control District, DENS is responsible for regulating and monitoring the air emissions from industry. Other agencies involved in hazardous materials and wastes management include: the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Regional Water Quality Cnntrol Board, end Publicly Owned Treatment Works. ES-4 U CHnPTER 3 WASTE GENERATION LEV F:LS, FACILITY INVENTORY, AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Comprehensive and accurate data on hazardous waste generation levels and management practices are critical elements of a Hazardous Waste Management Plan, A clear understanding of current waste generation and management practices provides the basis (or identifying program and farli:y ne-ds. C'cmP:chca data P:o•.~• a quan,da L:c -dr. sta r. ag of what types and amount ,o( hazardous waste are generated; by whom; why; and how it is treated and/or disposed. Analysis of the data will identify opportunities (or waste minimization. Knowledge of waste generation levels and management practices also serve as the basis (or developing or fine tuning regulatory compliance programs, as well as educational and technical assistance programs. This Information identifies areas [o emphasize in the training oC regulatory compliance inspectors and emergency responders. Finally, current and projected waste generation levels, when coupled with data regarding treatment ca Dacity should identify facility needs. The primary source of the data presented in this chapter is the C'a lifornia Department of Health Services (DHS) Hazardous Waste Information System (HWIS). The HW1S tracks all manifested shipments of hazardous waste in California. The data regarding hazardous waste shipments into and out of San Bernardino County during 1986 and 1987 were provided to the County Department of Environmental Health Services (DEHS) by the state. This data was analyzed and supplemented with information from DEIiS f ilcs, Biennial ReDOr[s (as available), and 1cleDhune interviews with muiviu uai genera wrs, uanspun<rs anu iacimies tas necessary r. rrcnt Waste Generation Lcv The San Bernardino County hazardous waste generators ship about 65,000 tons of waste of fsi[e (average of data (or 1986 and 1987). The primary industries that contributed to this waste generation include the primary metal industries, utilities, and railroad IransDOrtation. These industries generate a variety of wastes including metal containing liquids, waste oil, and baghouse wastes. The amount of wastes shipped of(si[e represent 596 of the total waste generated in the County. About 9596 (or 1.2 million tons) of the wastes are managed onsite at the place where they are generated. The County has two commercial facilities currently in operation (Chemwest ind ueiiio and Brow, iiKm pm Bicdj, o2atd ou a cmnyariwn ui the existing capacity n( these commercial facilities and [he present required treatment capacity, the County has excess capacity in other recycling, but may need to have facilities for oil recovery, solvent recovery, incineration, and stabilization. Further reduction or recycling of these wastes is possible, which would lessen the demand for these facilities. ES-5 t{ U ~/ Waste Generation Lev About 67,000 tons of hazardous waste arc anticipated to be managed offsite in the year 2000. Of this amount, waste oil, baghousc waste, and oily sludge are the largest categories of waste. The industrial sources of this projected amount of waste are the same as current sources. The County will have a projected capacity deficiency for treatment and recycling facilities. Chemwest Industries, the existing recycling facility, has tiled for closure and, will not (unction as a commercial facility. Discussion The analysis of the data Drovides considerable insight into hazardous waste management Dractices in San Bernartlino County and Drovidc the basis (or development of hazardous waste management politics in the remainder of this Plan. It is ex Dec[ed that an increasing amount of the hazardous waste now shipped offsite for treatment and/or disposal will in the future be managed onsite. For example, one major generator of metal containing liquids has obtained regulatory approval for onsi« recycling operations, thereby eliminating a significant waste stream. Although this trend is anticipated, the projections provided do not include an estimate of the extent of change from offsite to onsite management. While Chapter 5 establishes a framework for siting specified hazardous waste facilities, clearly the data establish a need for aDDlYing the siting eritcria and land use review Droccdures for onsite treatment and)or disposal facilities as well. This issue is addressed in Chap«r 8 of this Plan. WALJ AI\r/ rVLILILJ/AL11 V1\J Goals G-3-I To establish a comprehensive and accurate data bast to assist in Drogram devcloDment and to assess facility capacity needs. G-3-2 To ensure Iha[ the data base is maintained and updated regularly so that program planning is based on current information. Policies/Actions P/A3-I Because current data collection and management practires do not allow easy compilation or interpretation, this jurisdiction shall develop a comprehensive automated waste tracking system - integrates ,.- - ~ -11 bozo: dour - -Is and haze: does waslte programs,~~TheV system shall be based~on geographical, physical and land use characteristics. P;A-3-2 Because DHS in their comments on the Draft Hazardous Waste Management Plan requires that the County identify deficiencies ES-6 ~~~ and prioritize the manner in which the County will address These dcficiencies, this jurisdiction shall address [hc following dcficiencies: Perform a waste minimization assessment of all major hazardous waste producing industries and assist them in achieving maximum waste minimization as specified in Chapter q; 2. Identify industries subject to pretreatment requirements and assist them in achieving compliance; 3. Include estimates of clean up wastes from EzDcnditure Plan sites as they become available. P/A•3.3 Because improved data would enable the County to develop stronger policy on hazardous waste management and because local concerns change, this jurisdiction shall update the data on an annual basis and revise the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan at least once every three years. The background information and data shall be made accessible to other agencies and jurisdictions whenever possible. ES-7 ~~ CHAPTER 4 WASTE AUNIMIZATION R'aste minimization is an umbrella term that refers to source reduction and recycling, Source Reduction is defined as any process that reduces or eliminates the amount of waste being gcncrattd; it usually includes processes within the manufacturing or operating system of a business. Recycling refers to the use, reuse, or reclamation of a waste either onsi« or offsite after it is generated by a particular Droccss. H'astc minimization, as used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), denotes the reduction, to the extent possible, of hazardous waste that is generated or subsequently treated, stored, or disposed. It includes source reduction or recycling efforts that: 1) reduce [he total volume nr quantity of hazardous waste, or 2) reduce the toxicity of hazardous waste, or both. Of the two apProachcs to waste minimization, source reduction is the preferred method of reducing wastes. Source reduction and recycling are identified as preferred waste reduction options under the EPA's use of the term waste minimization. Treatment technologies should be considered only after acceptable waste minimization methods have been identified. This priority for waste reduction dif (ers from the State Department of Health Services (DHS) preferred options; the DHS includes treatment as a preferred waste reduction method. The DHS promotes the use of onsitc treatment measurts as a way of decreasing a county's overall nted for offsite facii ides. The EPA priority is used in this Plan because the County considers source reduction and recycling as the optimum methods for reducing wastes. San Btrnardino County DENS has had an informal waste minimization program since 1983. Tht program has consisted of providing waste reduction and management information to generators through the County hazardous waste generator program, distribution of waste reduction information through a quarterly newsletter sent to all hazardous waste generators in the County, and co-sponsorship o(a one-day waste reduction workshop with the University of California Riverside Extension Program. Recycling of waste is strongly encourageC through the existing program. Although presto[ efforts to encourage and promote waste minimization have been successful, an expanded program is necessary to provide more comprehensive assistance to all industries, to document quantitatively the value of [hest wash minimization methods, to maintain personnel with ex Demist in waste minimization as a resource (or industry, and [o ensure ,di 1VI.a1 iiiduii,r ii iukii,fl foil sd v2niau_e of wasic miniwicaiiun oDPOrtu nines. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS In order [o reduce the overall amount of wash generated in San Bernardino Cou n[y, an expanded waste minimization program should be established. ES-8 vY The following goals and policies/actions set forth guidelines (or the recommended waste minimization program for the County. Goals G-4-1 To minimize the generation of hazardous waste in San Bernardino County, to the extent possible. PClicies/Actions P/A-4-1 Bccaust reducing the amount of waste generated in this County is an e(Cective mechanism (or reducing the potential impact of [hest wastes to the public health and safety and the environment, and because legislation encourages the reduction, to the extent feasible, of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall encourage end promote practices that will, in ordu of priority: 1) reduce the use of hazardous materials and the generation of hazardous waste at [heir source; 2) recycle the remaining hazardous wastes for reuse; and 3) treat those wastes which cannot be reduced at the source or recycled. Only residuals from waste recycling and treatment shall be land disposed. P/A-4-2 Because industry often lacks the technical information or in- house expertise to develop waste minimization programs, and additional resources are necessary at the local level to assist irdus:ry in developing such Orograms, the County steal: czpard the waste minimization program to include education, technical assistance, economic incentives, and recognition elements. Educational materials and technical assistance should be the first priority of the program. Such information and assists ncc arc the cornerstone to industry participation in waste minimization efforts. Other measures, Tike economic incentives and recognition measures, should also be implemented, but these arc of a lower priority'. The program shall consist of, but not be limited to, [he following components: EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE: Develop an expanded educational program on waste minimization that includes: I) brochures, publications, and pvstt:e tc alert the pubic srd industry or. the imp^_rta.^.ce of waste minimization as well as describe appropriate reduction technologies and 2) audiovisual aids on waste minimization [hat can be taken to businesses, trade associations and public meetings. Hold seminars and workshops for industry on waste minimization techniques and regulatory issues. Some of ES-9 l V these seminars or workshops could be co-sponsored with local universities, Chambers of Commerce, or the DHS. Encourage trade associations and industry to (orm an industry task force to promote information exchange. Maintain library of technical reference materials and prepare a waste reduction resource directory. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Hire a waste minimization specialist to coordinate the program implementation and providc on-going assistance to generators on waste minimization techniques. Provide training to hazardous waste generator inspectors on waste minimization techniques. The inspectors will incorporate waste minimization assessments into routine inspections and should be knowledgeable about the effectiveness of these techniques. Provide waste audits on request and incorporate into routine inspections. ECONOMIC INCENTIVES Provide information on availability of pooled loan fund and state grants for developing innovative technolcgy rsepuce perms lees for lams roar aenteve waste minimization. RECOGNITION OF OUTSTANDING PROGRAMS Develop a method for recognizing firms that have achieved notable success in reducing hazardous waste. Also, the program shall assist industry in preparing state and federal waste minimization reports. A copy of the report shall be submitted to the County DEHS a[ the time of permit renewal so that an annual «port can be developed to measure [he progress of waste minimization efforts. The annual waste minimization report prepared by DEHS shall identify activities undertaken by the department and providc some indication of the amount oC hazardous wastes reduced as v resuii of local cCfuris. PiA-4~3 Because having the County conduct a waste minimization audit is a voluntary action 6y a business and those businesses that panicipate may not be in full compliance with regulatory requirements, the County shall address violations as specified in state law, The County shall develop in conjunction with the Disu ict Attorney policies (or deciding on such violations ES-10 / ~ " pursuant to the requirements set forth in Seetion 25552 of the California Health and Safety Coda The Dolicies eeveloDed to address such violations shall include, but not be limited to, the following: I) Whether the action is a knowing, willful, negligent, or inadvertent violation; 2) Whether [he violator agrees to the schedule of compliance specified by the County; and 3) Whether [he violation was discovered during an onsitc consuttatiD,-, carried vut pursuant to this chapter. In addition, the County may take enforcement action, er refer the violation for enforcement action, in accordance with state law. ES-I I ~~ CHAPTER 5 SITING OF SPECIFIED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES Devtlopment of specified hazardous waste facilities requires permits from start and Iocai agencies. The State Department of Health Services is responsible for issuing hazardous waste facility permits and for ensuring that operating conditions imposed on the approval of a facility are met. It is the responsibility of focal governments, however, to see that a i acii i[y is sited in areas with compatible land uses, to ensu rc [hat conditions of approval on land use permits are impkmcntcd and carried out for the duration of the projtct and to respond to hazardous material/waste emergencies. At the Iocai level, both discretionary and ministerial land use permits would be rtquired, Local land use authority is derived from p~tiee powers which wire reserved to the starts by the Federal Constitution and delegated to cities and counties in California 6y Article XI, Section 7 of [he State Constitution. Outline of the Local Aooiintiop Review Process Tht types of applications required (or local evaluation of a specified hazardous waste facility arc listed below. The required local land use permits include: Application to Apply the Zoning Overlay of 'Specified Hazardous w35I^_ Facility" to the project s..c and mspcct:vc butte: (set Policy P/A-5-4). Site approval application (Conditional Ust Pcrm ittl Special Use Permit (issued by the County Environmental Health Services Director, rtquired as a condition of approval on the d iscrctionary permiq Ainisterial Permits from Building, Grading, Flood Control, etc. A Sitc Approval (Conditional Use Permit), or applicable city application, is necessary to site sDtcified hazardous waste tacit itics in San Bernardino County. Along with the Conditional Usc Permit application, an application to apply the sDtcified hazardous waste facility zoning overlay is required for ali proposed specified hazardous waste tacit itics. The overlay zpplies to the projtct site and associated buffer. Requiring the overlay restricts future development [o uses that arc compatible with specified hazardous wgs[e farili!i~a Th. ('egpry or ca. Her..^.ardfr• Land 91a^.agcm.ni Department, Office of Planning, or applicable City department would process the land use application. Other departments, such as the Tht County of San Bernardino refers to its discretionary land use application as a "Site Approval". It is equivalent to a Conditional Use Permit Application. ES•12 ~/~J d Enviropmental Health Servic: Department, will have a significant role in rcv'iewing and commenting on aDDlica lion. The following information outlines the local application review process (or evaluating a specified hazardous waste facility proposal. The rcquircments added by state law arc included in the information below, Refer to Figure 5.1 (or an illustration of the items mentioned. The Figure includes a description of the state process for informational purposes since it may be a concurrent process. a) At Itast 90 davs prior [o the submittal of a formal app!ica!ien the a DDlicant must submit a Notice of Intent (NOq to the Office of Permit Assistance (in the State Office of Planning and Research) and with the applicable city or County jurisdiction. The NOI provides a romplete description of [he nature and scope of the project. The local agency notifies the public about the proposed project by publishing notices in a newspaDCr of general circulation, posting notices in the location where [hc project is proposed, and mailing notices to owners of property contiguous with ffic proposed project site. b) Subsequent [o the NOI the Office of Permit Assistance convenes a public meeting in the affected city or County to inform the public on the nature and scope of the proposed project. The meeting also considers the procedures necessary for review of a specified hazardous waste facility application. c) Within 90 daps after receiving :he NOI the local agency appoints a seven member Local Assessment Committee. The Committee meets with the applicant to determine the terms and conditions for project public health and usafety andT[he envi ronmcnt, as well was the fiscal wel (are through special benei its and compe nsa[ion. The composition of the Committee consists of three representatives of the community at large, two reDresenta[ives of environmental or public ir.cerest groups, and two representatives of affected businesses and industries. d) The applicant participates in a Dre-aDPlica[ion meeting which is set up with the local government agency (as required by the Health and Safety Code, Section 25199.7 (e)). This conference provides an opportunity for the County and any applicable department to advise the applicant on project consistency with the Ganeral Plan and CHWMP before a formal application is submitted as well as to respond to questions regarding the permit process, Mos[ cities ha vc a similar procedure. e) Formal aDDlications may be submitted to a city or the County once these initial steps have been undertaken. Both the Site Approval Application (Conditional Use Permit Application) and the specified hazardous waste facility zoning overlay application are required. Stare law requires the permitting agency to decide on the completeness of the application and to notify the applicant rego rd ing ES-13 ~( ~/ completeness within 30 days from the date the applications were submitted. O Within 10 days from the date the application was deemed complete, and within 60 days from [he notice of application completeness, the Office of Permit Assistance holds a Dost-a DDlication meeting among fhc Iced and responsible agencies, the applicant, the Local Assessment Committee, and the public, The purpose of [he meeting is to determine the issues of sorcern [o the public and the permitting agceti<s. Onct thtst iswts havs bttn ht2rd tht applicant anA tht Local Assessment Committee meet regarding the terms and conditions acccDtable to the community. The Act includes a prevision for the Local Assessment Committee (LAC) to hire a consultant to review the project. The applicant would pay a Pee established by the local agency. In addition, if differences between the LAC and the applicant cannot be resolved, the OPA may recommend the use of a mediator, The applicant would pay half [he cost for mediation. g) Whcn the application has been found complete by the permitting agency, an initial study of the project will be made to identify the significant impacts on the environment. If one or more significant impacts are identified then an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. If no significant impacts are found or if the significant impacts can be mitigated, a Negative Declaration will be preps red. Whcn preparing an EIR the lead agency is required to and out a notice to all applicable agencies regarding the preparation of the EIR. A scoping h<aring can be performed 6y the lead agency to obtain public in DUt. After a Draft EIR has been released the public and responsible agencies have 4$ days in which to comment on the ,av~.y uu~l ~• •,,.. ~.u•~. •.... .i..... .. ~.......v~. ~.. ..i ...~ ~....-.......~...~. Review Committee in a public meeting. The environmental document is ccrlif ied by the decision-making body (in [his case the board of Supervisors) when a decision is made on a project. Refer to P,~A-S- 4 for the issues that will be evaluated as par[ of the environmental analysis. h) A noticed public hearing is then scheduled before the Planning Commission for consideration of the site approval (Conditional Use Permit) and application of the zoning overlay. A staff «por[ is prepared by the Itad agency which describes the project, any issuts of concern, and a recommendation for approval or denial oC th< land use applications. The Local Assessment Committee also prepares a report that is submitted to both the Planning Commission and the Board of Su DCrvisors or the City Council. It includes the Committee's ..w.r:nne rn. n oni n. nrnlai of rnr n nrr and nnv trrmc and conditions which have been negotiated. The'Planning Commission forwards its recommendations to the Hoard of Supervisors er City Council. A decision on the application is made by the Board of Su Dervisors or City Council, at a noticed public hearing. Any interested person or the aDPlican: may file an appeal an the approval of the project or the conditions of approval with the State Appeal E$-14 ~~~ n m lL V N O j 5€~ €s~= V O - q ~a 6 u ~ c ~ n a= ~+ O V T u n ° E u ~ ..~ ~g _ ~ ~ ~ ~ E n c ~ O V ~ u 6 D C C p p p° 9 C y V I r o CO 0. 2 ~ E ~ c '- o ~ o u ~ ' ro yl o p , C p ui C `o _ ~~ V V T n ~ e 4 t ~ .o p E ..ll G L'. V ' tl ~ c0 n 3 V ~ ; o ~ e C F I V ~i_ G C q i ~ _ C r !a( J U N ~ U aua d g o' z ssa~oad -tvJO~ ~ 3 C a .Y U u _o u c C u ~ "u' C ~ n e p 5 u ~ .` µ . ~ C 0 7 u - " j G G U C (') c[ o --•, F C T R ~~ SS3JOad 31b'1S W Board, within 30 Gays of that decision. A decision on the appeal will be based on consistency with an adopted, approved CHWMP. i) A Special Use Permit is issued as a condition of approval on the Site Approval (Conditional Use Permit). The purpose of this permit is to ensure that conditions of approval are carried out. If no appeals arc filed on the land use applications, ministerial permits may be issued. These permits may include permits from wi:ding ar,u safety, grading, environmtnia: hea:ih, flood LSnL OI, etc. Sitiog Criteria Start law requires the CHWMP to include siting criteria and designate general arras where the criteria might apply. Siting criteria set forth a structure for evaluating proposals for specified hazardous waste facilities and serve to Cocus the evaluation of facility proposals on critical issues. Siting criteria represent a uniform set of standards applied to all applications, yet they are designed with some flexibility depending on the type of facility and the proposed site location. Siting criteria arc used for evaluating a project at a particular site. When used along with general plan policies, the siting criteria determine the suitability o(a site (or a specified hazardous waste facility proposal. The use of the siting criteria and General Plan policies art part of the full aDDlication review and environmental analysis required of all applications for specified hazardous waste facilities under state law. The complete siting crittria follow the Dol icies/actions of this chapter. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS The following goals, policies, and actions shall be implementtd to ensure that spcci tied hazardous waste facilities are reviewed according to the procedures identified in start law and sited in [he most environmentally preferred locations. Two terms arc used to identify the implementing agency. The term "this jurisdiction" refers to the applicable city or county, Where County and "this jurisdiction" are used, the policy applies to both the County of San Bernardino and [he applicable governmental bod v. Goals G-S-I To establish an effective and expeditious application review process for siting specified hazardous waste facilities that includes extensive public DarticiDation. G-S-'. To apply a uniform set of criteria to the siting oC sDwi(icd hazardous waste facilities in the County for the protection of the public health and safety and the environment. G-5-3 To ensure coordination among agencies and County departments in the review of ail specifieA hazardous waste facility applications within the County. ES-16 ~~~ G-5-4 To protect vital groundwater resources for present and future beneficial uses. Policies and Actions P/A-5-1 Because specified hazardous waste facilities shall only 6e sited in areas where land uses have been deemed compatible with such facilities by the local jurisdiction, an applicant for a specified hazardous waste facility must aDDIY for a Site Approval ( Conditional Use Permit) and a zoning amendment. The zoning amendment applies the Specified Hazardous Waste Facility overlay (as defined in P/A•5.4) to the project site and buffer area. The applicant shall meet all provisions of the sDtcified hazardous waste facility overlay diserict (see Policy P/A-5-4) as well as other general plan and ordinance Drovisions. P/A-5-2 Bccausc [he evaluation of a project application is a costly and time consuming effort and the public involvement demands a large ex Dense: A) The applicant shall fund the public notification efforts including public hearing notices to residents and property owners within 3000 feet of the proposed Drojec[ boundary, legal and display advertisements in local ntwsDa Dtrs and a paper of general circulation, and a sign (21 sq. fiJ lu be displayed on or near the project site (pursuant to the Government Code, Section 65090). Al The annlicanr chatl lunA arriv bf.a ..t~r:~o r~ r6• .. +..n evaluation o(a sDtcified hazardous waste Vfacilily application, including staff time, Consultants hired [o assist the Local Assessment Committee with application review, review by any applicable city, and pre-application assessments. (Government Codc Section 65941.5 and [he Health and Sa tt-ety Code, Section 25199.7) Policies/Actiom Rwuircd of this Jurisdiction P/A-5-3 Because the County recognizes it's resDOnsibility for siting needed sDtcified hazardous waste fatalities proposed in environmentally sound locations, this County will consider applications for specified hazardous waste facilities. Proposals - facial iie5 in iht CGUniv must include anniicatinn~ for~a~Site Approval (Conditional Use Permit) and for a specified Hazardous Waste Facility overlay (see P/A-5.4), A decision on the applications will be based on making the following findings: a. The proposed project is consistent with the Drovisions of the General Plan, Development Code (zoning ordinance), ES-17 C~~S the CHWMP including the siting criteria, and the public resources code (Section 21000, ct. s<q.). b. The facility location andjor design adequately protect public health, safety, and the environment. c. The project is proposed in an area where present and future surrounding uses arc compatible with the specified hazardous waste facility. Pj.4-5-4 Because local land use plans and zoning ordinances are reyuircd by state law to specifically address the permitting of specified hazardous waste facilities and such plans and ordinances do not address rcquircments (or these facilities, and bwause applicants for specified hazardous waste facilities a:e required to aDDIY for a project-specific requss[ to include the hazardous waste facility overlay on the Droject site and buffer zone and czisting ordinances do not define or specify the requirements of such an overlay, this jurisdiction shall amegd the Developmcn[ Code (or Zoning Ordinance) ro require dl specified hazardous waste facilities to be permitted only with ao aDDraved Site Approval (Conditional Uu Permit) in areas with a zoning overlay of Specified Hazardous Waste Facility. The overlay shall be aDPlicable to all specified hazardous waste facility applications. The purpose of the overlay is to ensure that facilities are sited in areas that protect public health, safety, welfare, and the environment; to assign the specified Hazardous Waste Facility overlay to the project site and buffer so that meompattble uses cannot oe permirteu in nc~ iuwte, m identify permitted uses of the overlay; and [o outline the permit review procedures. The Development Code (or zoning ordiosem) shall define the Specified Hazsrdouz Waste Facility avcrlay as containing the following: I. A requirement Iha[ specified hazardous waste facilities may locate is cattalo lead use districts (or zone) with an approved Si[e Approval (Conditional Uu Permit) and Specified Hazardous Waste Facility Overlay. Land disposal facilities and incineration facilities shall locate in Resource Conservation Districts (or zone) and other areas with a DDDUlation of less than 20 people Dcr square mile with an approved Specified Hazardous Waste Facility Overlay. Treatment. incineration, recycling, storage, and transfer facilities should ioca¢ in Fsegionai ind usir iai di5i, kis iheavy industrial zone or equivalent) with an approved Specified Hazardous Waste Facility Overlay. Incineration facilities shall not, however, be located in areas where emissions from the facility could directly impact food crops or livestock. (See discussion in Section 5.3.1 of this chapter.) ES-I8 UV/ 2. Tht aitiag criteria prexDted is this chapter (starting o0 loge S-2g). The criteria shall bt adopted as development standards that shall be mel along with otr:r poliG.s of the General Plan and provisions of the Dc .aopmen~ '~ de (zoning ordinance) before a facility is approved. Compim oce with the siting criteria shall be evaluated as part of the environmental analysis. 3. Tht aDDlication procedure xt out iD AB 2948 (Chapter 1504, S[atatu of 1966) for the review of specified hazardous waste facility aDDliatioas. A requirement that all specified hazardous waste facility apDlitatious arc mbject to a Spccisl Ux Permit. The purpose of the Special Use Permit shall be to evaluate the operation and monitoring Dlan of [he facility, to ensure the facility has adequate measures for monitoring on-going impacts to air quality, groundwater, and environmentally sensitive resources, to evaluate the types and quantities of wastes that will be treated or disposed of at [he facility, and to require periodic inspections of Chc facility to encore conditions of approval arc carried out. 5. A requirement that all specified hazardous waste facility application include information about the project proponent's Dast business pnctitcs. DiSCretiObary eppiice lion review regairements [O CDagre developers are aware of the different studies that will be required in the eoviroomeotal analysis when assessing the mnir of (aril ifv •nn1:r~Nnm O ...rie~ e..w ... program shall be adopted to mitigate or~avoid significant environmental impacts as required by A8 3180 (Chapter 1232, Statutes of 1988). The different issues that must be studied consist of, but arc nol limited to, the following: a) An analysis of [he project's potential impact to surface and groundwater resources as well as public water supplies. The study shall identify monitoring and mitigation measures that ensure protection of vital surface and groundwater resources for the life of the project. b) An evaluation of the project's impact to air quality and Ih< consistency of [hc project with air quality regUiaiiGni and ihC local air nuaiiry nia^c. Tne evaluation must consider toxic air contaminants, wind patterns, and an assessment of the project's impact to PSD and non attainment areas. c) An analysis of potential mineral deposits through a site characterization study. ES-19 C~~ d) A review of the adequacy and capacity of the proposed transportation routes including an identification of highway accident rates. (Refer [o Chapter 10, P/A-10-3, (or other issues to address in the study.) c) An assessment of risk on the population that evaluates the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific types of wastes which will be handled, the design features of the acility, as evalaatior. cC potential air emissions from proposed (acility, and any need for buffers from residences, immobile populations, and environmentally sensitive resources. IC s (acility proposes to handle acutely hazardous waste, an analysis oC the maximum credible accident may he necessary pursuant [o AB 3777 (Chapter 1260, Statutes of 1966). The study shall take into consideration the quantity and types of wastes that could be received at the facility, the design features, and the planned operational practices at the facility. Based on the above items, the study shall provide an estimate of the distance over which any effects would carry, options (or reducing the risk, and procedures for dealing with the effects, including recommendations for an aDDropria to buffer distance. g) An evaluation of the DrojecPs impact to the socioeconomic characteristics of the affected [unsdict~on and an assessment of me economic viability of the project. h) An evaluation of cultural, archaeological, and paleontological resources on the project site and surrounding buffer. P; A-5-3 Because several agencies (i.e. Air Quality agencies, Rrgional Water Quality Control Board, Department of Health Services) and local governments (County, cities and Special Districts) will be involved in the permitting of sDCCif ied hazardous waste facilities, this jurisdiction shall request all applicable agencies and local government departments to participate in a meeting of a specified hazardous waste facility application at the pre- application stage (as required by Health and Safety Code, Section 2i i99.7 (ejj, The purpose of the meeting is iu diacum and document issues of concern to all appropriate agencies as well as aDDlication « view requirements and time frames. This jurisdiction will assist the applicant in developing a matrix of all reviewing agencies and agency «quirements before a formal application is accepted. ES•20 ~~ P/A-S-b Because specified hazardous waste facilities have a potential for adverse impacts on the environment, all applications shall comply with the polices of ehe CHWMP and the siting criteria an.: shall be the subjr! of environmental analysis The cnvironmcntal analysis shall be done as a consolidated cl fort among applicable County Departments. Compliance with nc~ siting criteria shall be evaluated in the enviroomental analysis. P/A-S-7 Because this jurisdiction needs to ensure that wastewater is appropriately discharged, this jurisdiction shall require specified hava rdonF waste faci6tiet generating treattQ wastewater to discharge to the Santa Ana Interceptor (SARI line), to the Chino Nonreclaimable Waste Linc (Brine Line), ar any future industrial waste line or an approved new technology that treats or eliminates the discharge. Wastewater shall meet all applicable agency requirements for discharge to these waste lines, P.'A-S-B Because a significant portion of County land (ells under federal jurisdwtion, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service, and the Department of Defense (DOD), and the policies of DOD exclude [he development of specified hazardous waste facilities, and because Indian lands comprise another significant component and Native American Tribal Councils have expressed concern over the development of specified hazardous waste facilities in the County, the County shall take the following actions; A. Complete a Memorandum of L'ndcrstandmg wrth the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regard•.ng review of specified hazardous waste applications for [hose projects proposed B. Notify and request involvement of Native American Tribal Councils in the review of all specified hazardous waste facility applications in their region; and C. Prohibit specified hazardous waste facilities on private lands in the Death Valley and Joshua Tre: National Monuments, Mitchell Caverns Slate Park, National Forest Lands administered by the U,S. Forest Service, the East Mojave National Scenic Area, and any Wilderness Area designated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or wilderness study area designated by BLM as suitable for a Wilderness Arca pursuant to the Federal Land Management Policy Act of 1976. When Congress acts on Wilderness e.... rn,. o~i,~o ennu n. enri.ri m hr r cicrnnr wire those Wilderness Areas. P/A-S-9 Because state law authorizes a [ax (not exceeding 10°b of gross receipts) on an approved specified hazardous waste facility, and these facilities have a potential to impact [he environment, public health, and public services, this jurisdiction shall set ES•21 I / / aside a portion of the revenue for programs that encourage sale and responsible management of hazardous waste. P/A•5.10 Because the siting criteria and the policies of this plar. should be applied uniformly throughout [hc County in order to ensure that effective management of hazardous waste and that facilities arc sited only in environmentally sound locations, the County shall encourage all the cities within the County to adopt the CHWMP and the siting trite: is and development policies. P/A-S-!I Because specified hazardous waste facility proposals could impact proposed city or County redevelopment projects, this jurisdiction shall inform the applicable rcdevcloDment agency of all specified hazardous waste facility applications. P/A-5-12 Because the CHWMP sets forth comprehensive criteria for siting needed specified hazardous waste (acilities, the siting critttia should be used to determine [he suitability of projects in all County, city, state, and federal lands. P; .4-5-13 Because the Department of Defense (DOD) contributes significantly to hazardous waste production in the County as a result of site remcdiation efforts, DOD operations, and businesses producing products far DOD, this plan encourages the following: A) That the DOD implement waste reduction efforts to the maximum extent passible, B) That the DOD obtain appropriate permits from local jurisdictions and allow periodic inspection of facilities for cmm~lia nee with envirnnmroral reoula rinnc C) That the DOD consider undertaking land exchange or lease agreements with industry desiring to site specified hazardous waste facilities in DOD property. Di That the DOD undertake hazardous waste management ef(aris which arc consistent with the goals and policies/actions of this Plan. P/A-5-14 Bcca use cement kilns can use certain hazardous wastes as a secondary fuel and the use oC such fuel significantly reduces large amounts of waste and may result in improved air emissions, this jurisdiction shall encourage facilities in $an Bernardino County with cement kilns to use certain hazardous wastes as a -aati.c - urocs of crrgv, Drty where irrproccmcc [s ir. air emissions can be achieved. P; A-S-I S Because Section 65300 0( the California Government Code places a dual mandate on how cities and counties must consider development within a sphere of influence, the County shall ensure that all applications (or spccif ied hazardous waste facilities are reviewed for consistency with the goals and ES-22 ~~ policies of the 1989 County General Plan regarding development in a sphere of influerre (LU-B and LU-9). P; A-5-16 Because TTU's have the potential to impact public health and safety and the environment, this jurisdiction shall apply the siting procedures to TTU's on a cast-by-case basis. Case by case determination shall be based on the characteristics of the proposed Orojec[ site, including its proximity to residential and/or immobile populations, length of operation in any given area, the amount and type of hazardous waste to be treated, the DroDOSCd method of lrestment, sod the equipmen! and land area necessary to operate the TTU. In order to exempt a TTU from compliance with the siting Criteria and zoning overlay requirement of policy P/p-5-4, a demonstration must be made [ha[ the TTU falls undo an existing land use Drrmi[ for an existing business or (aci!ity, or, the TTU is a minor, tem0orary use approvable by a ministerial action. The determination of applicability shall be made by the directors of the city or County Planning Department and the County Environmental Health Services repartment with in0ut from other applicable departments. If resolution of the applicability of the siting criteria or Doiicy P/A•5-4 cannot be reached, the decision shall be made by the city or County Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. PiA-5-17 Because San Bernardino County obtains about 8596 of its drinking water from groundwater and a significant percentage of the population of Southern California also depends on San Bernardino County groundwater for its beneficial uses, and became iuapptupi iawiY ancu ~c.cio VUrtm ii.wi,.J6,a ay,..u ice.: hazardous waste facilities) have the potential to adversely impact groundwater, this jurisdiction shall develop a County-wide groundwater Orotcction strategy. The strategy should consider specific policies and programs for regulation of potential sources of pollution as well as identify mechanisms to dcmct and correct possible impacts to the groundwater. ES-23 ~/ SITING CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES (Refer to Policies P/A-S-~ AND P/A-S-ti) PROTECT THE RESIDENTS OF SAN BERNARDiNO COUNTY PROXD.BTY TO RESIDENCES A 2000 foot buffer zone Crom residences shall be required for any land disposal (acili[v unless the owner demonstrates [o the satisfaction of the County or city and the State Department of Health Services that a buffer zone of less than 2000 feet is adequate for the protection of public health and safety. To detcrmire the appropriate buffer a risk assessment shall be required which considers the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific type of wastes [hat will be handled, the design features of the facility, and any need for buffering «sidential areas or other sensitive areas from potential accidents or adverse emissions from a proposed facility. b. A risk asscssmcnt shall be required for any ifSatment. rccvclinre. storaee- and transfer facilities. The risk assessment should consider the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific type of wastes Char will be handled, the design of the facility, and any need for buffering residential areas or other sensitive areas Crom potential accidents or adverse emissions f.n.e n e~A fnnlG,.. 2. PROXIMITY TO IMMOBILE POPULATIONS Specified hazardous waste,__[a~lltles shall be sited so that no significant risk is Drcscntcd to the immobile poDUlation. An adequate buffer between the hazardous waste facility and the immobile population shall be established by a risk assessment. The risk assessment shall consider the physical and chemical characteristics of [he specific types of wastes which will be handled and the design fcatulcs of the facility and proximity to immobile populations. Immobile populations include schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, prison (acili[its, facilities for the mentally ill, ere. 3. PROXIMITY TO PUBLfC FACILITIES Soccificd hazardous waste facilities should be sited in such a manner as they do not adversely impact the public health and safety of large numbers of people in public areas or people in public facilities. An adequate but Cer shall be determined by a risk asscssmcnt. ES-24 spa 4. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES Soccified hazardous waste tacit ~tiea shoal:' be located in areas where emergency response capabilities and public water and sewer sen ices arc available. When facilities are located in desert or rural areas where public services are not readily available, privately-owned onsitc water, sewer, and emergency services (self-sufficient services) may be used. 5. FLOOD PLAIN AREAS a. Land disoo~al (acilitia may not be located in areas subject to 100-year eveots even with protection (CFR, Title 40, Scc[ion 264.18 (b) and CCR Title 22, see Section 66391 (a)(11)(b)). Flood Dlain areas include areas subject to flooding by dam or Icvee failure and natural causes such as river flooding, ra in (all or snowmcl[, tsunamis, sciches and coastal flooding. b. Treatment. recvcline. storage. and transfe C 'lir'a may be located in areas subject [0 100-year flooding if designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to Drevent failure due [o such events. Flood plain areas include areas subject to flooding by dam or levee failure and natural causes such as river flooding, rainfall or snowmelt, tsunamis, sciches and coastal flooding. 6. PROXIMITY TO ACCIVE OR RECENTLY ACTIVE FAULTS No soecif ied ha zardpus waste facility should be olaced within 200 feet of an active or recently active fault. (California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Sermon 66391 (a) (1 I) A (p and (2). 7. UNSTABLE SOILS Land di•oosal facilities shalt not be located in areas of potential rapid geologic change (Title 23, Subchapter I5, Section 2531 (e) of the CCR). b. Tr arm nt r v line s[orae and tran<(r Ce ilitj~ may be located in areas of potential rapid geologic change if designed, constructed, maintained, end operated [o prevent failure as a result o! such changes (Title 23, Subchapter I5, Section 2531 (c) of the CCR). ES-25 ~~3 8. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER a. Land disoosal facilities shall be loeated where natural geologic features provide a natural barrier that Drevtnts contamination of vital groundwater resources by waste and Itachatc (Titl< 23, Subchapter I5, Section 2531 (a) of the CCR) and which meet the siting requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board. b. Treatment. recvclina. stora¢e. and transfer (acili[ics shall be located where natural geologic features prevent the contamination of groundwater unless the engin<ering design and construction of the (acili[y and containment structures are capable of preventing significant adverse impacts to groundwater. 9. MAJOR RECHARGE AREAS FOR AQUIFERS a. Land disoosal facilities should be prohibited within any area known or suspected to be supplying principal recharge to a «gional aquifer as defined in state, regional, or general plans. The County General Plan and Bulletin k118, 1975, of the California Department of Water Resources identify the following as regional aquifers: Ames Valley (7-16) Antelope Valley (6-44) Bear Valley (8-9) Ifesaemer vauey (t-ul Big Meadows Valley (8.7) Caves Canyon Valley (b-38) Copper Mountain Palley (7-11) Dale Valley (7-9) Deadman Vallev (7-13 EI Mirage Valley (6-43) Harper Valley (6-47) Helendalc Fault Valley (7-48) Iron Aidge Ar<a (7-50) Johnson Valley (7-18) Kane Wash Area (6-89) Lavic Valley (7.14) Lost Horse Valley (7-51) Lower Mojave River Valley (6-40) Lucerne 'v alley (7-i9) Means Valley (7-17) Middle Mojave River Valley (6.41) Morongo Valley (7-20) Needles Valley (7-44) Pipes Canyon Fault Valley 17.49) Seven Oaks Valley (8-8) Troy Valley (6.39) ES-26 ~~ Twentyoine Palm Valley (7-10) Upper Mojave River Valley (6-42) Warren Valley (7-I2) Upper Saata Ana Valley (8-2) b. Treatment recvelina sto aae and transfer facilities may be locatcd in principal recharge areas iC facilities arc designed, constructed, maintained, and operated to prevent accidental releases, 10. PERMEABILITY OF SURFICIAL MATERIALS a. Land disposal facilities shall be located in areas where underlying geology provides impermeability meeting the requirements of the SWRCB (pursuant to Title 23, Subchapter I5, Section 2531 (b) (I) of the California Code of Regulations). b. Trcatmen[ recvelina s[ora¢e and transfer facilities may be sited in areas where soils are permeable if adcqua!c !ngineered features such as spill eontair.ment, monitoring, and inspection measurrs arc included in the project design and construction. PROTECT AlR QUALITY 1 I. NON-ATTAINMENT AIR AREAS ~ ~ •'f'ei Rata does wa~te facilit'cs may be locatcd in non-attainment areas if the facilities meet the plans and regulations of the air quality agency of each district. 12- CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) AREAS Specified ha ardour waste facilities may be located in PSD areas i( facilities meet the Dians and regulations of the air quality agency of each district. These facilities, however, may not located near or within national parks, wilderness and memorial areas, and other similarly dedicated areas, as spccif ied in the Clean Air Act. PROTECT ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS 13. WETLANDS SuoLifiid ndiaidVUi 'w aSiE fdvi it ilGi i -~. uC p: phibited f:pm i ng the viability of wetlands such as saltwater, fresh water, and brackish marshes, swamps, and bogs inundated by surface or groundwater with a frequency to support, under normal circumstances, pravaicncc of vegetative or aquatic life which requires saturaeed soil conditions for growth and reproduction, as defined in general, regional, state, and ES-27 S~~ federal plans. A protective buffer zone shall be established based en a biological resource study and risk assessment. 14. HABITATS OF THREATENED, RARE, OR ENDANGERED SPECIES Soecified hazardous waste facilities shall be prohibited from impairing the viability of habitats of threatened, rare, or endangered species as defined in general, regional, state, and federal Dlans. A protective buffer zone shall be established based on a biological resource study and risk assessment. I5. PRIh4E AGRICULTURAL LANDS Soecified hazardous waste facilities may not be sited on prime agricultural lands as defined in California law and adopted local land use plans unless an overriding public need is served. When siting hazardous waste management facilities in these areas, overriding public service needs must be demonstrated. 16. RECREATIONAL, CULTURAL, OR AESTHETIC RESOURCES Soecified hazardous waste facilities shall not be located in recreational, cultural, or aesthetic resource areas except low volume transfer and storage facilities which are necessary to handle hazardous waste generated 6y visitors, workers, or residents in these areas. Recreational, cultural, and aesthetic resource areas include public and/or private lards having local, regional, state, or national significance, value or importance such as: national, state, regional county and local parks and recreation areas; historic resources; wild and scenic rivers; scenic highways; ecological preserves; public and private Dreservation areas; and other lands of local, regional, state, or national significance. 17. AREAS OF POTENTIAL MINERAL DEPOSITS Sosci(ied hazardous wane Cacil hies should not be located so as to preclude extraction of minerals necessary to sustain the economy oC the State. LAND USE RESTRICTION Ig, MILITARY LANDS Yu blic speed tad hazardous waste facilities shall not be sited on military lands Dursuant to DOD policy. ES-28 ~" FNCLtRP CAFE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 19. PROXIM1llTY TO AREAS OF WASTE GENERATION a, Land disposal facilities may be located more distant from waste generation sources than other facilities because of their requirement for larger land and buffer areas. b. Treatment rec cl'n¢ atoraae. and transfer facilities shall be close to hazardous waste generation sources to minimize the risks of transportation. 20. PROXIIsOTY TO MAIOR TRANSPORTATION ROUTES Coec'f'ed hazardous waste facilities shall have good access to and from major transportation routes (state or intersta[a divided highways). 21. MINIIvIILE TRANSPORT THROUGH AUNOR ROUTES Coecified haza dour warte facilities should be sited so that road networks leading to major transportation routes do not pass through residential neighborhoods, should minimize residential frontages, and should be demonstrated to be safe with regard to road design and construction, accident rafts, excessive traffic, cte. 22. LOCATIONAL RESTRICTIONS DUE TO TRANSPORTATION ROUTES a. SDCCifisd_haxardous waste facilities shall not be located where highways 58, 62, and 71 arc used as major transportation routes identifies mitigation measures which can be implemented to make the paeticular route suitable for its use as a major route. b. 1 0 plume transfer and storaee facilities may be located in these areas if necessary to manage the hazardous wastes from that area. ES-29 S"~ CHAPTER 6 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS State and federal governments have established programs which require businesses that handle hazardous substances to Dreparc an inventory of the hazardous substances stored and to provide that list to a local agency dcsignarod to administer the program. The purpose of these disclosure laws is ro have information available [o first responders in the event of an emergency at the site and to provide information to local residents regarding the kinds and amounts of chemicals stored in their communities. The legislation did not include standards for above ground storage of hazardous substances as part of its mandate. Assembly Bill 2185 (Chapter 1167, Statutes of 1986) mandates that all businesses handling hazardous substances provide to the local administering agency an inventory and location oC hazardous substances stored on the property. This law applies to all businesses which handle at any one time more than 500 pounds, 55 gallons, ar 200 cubic (ee[ (compressed gas) of a hazardous material. The Department of Environmental Health Services !DEHS) has been designated the administering agency for purposes of the AB 2185 program for the County of San Bernardino, including the incorporated cities (California Health and Sa(e[y Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95). This chapter supporrs existing efforts in the underground tank program and recommends a continued effort in the maintenance of underground tank records and an annual report on [his program. Above ground storage requirements arc recommended for inclusion in County implementing ordinances. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G-6-I To reduce the risks posed by the storage of hazardous substances in about ground tanks and containers. G-64 To minimize the threat of contamination of groundwater from leaking underground storage tanks contain irg ha>_ardous materials. G-6-3 To minimize the threat to residcntia! areas from the use of ha za rdnus materials. Politics/Actions P/A-6-I Because some waste reduction technologies significantly reduce or eliminate the amount of hazardous waste generated since they are a part of the manufacturing process, and because the equipment for these technologies Carr malfunction causing the FS-30 ~~ potential for a hazardous substanec release, the County shall amend Uniform Environr^~ntal Code to require all hazardous waste generators and hazardous material handlers to report any such equipment malfunction or uDSe[ which may cause hazardous waste to be generated. P/A-6-2 Because above ground storage of hazardous materials may Dose a threat to public health and safety and the environment and County ordinances do not include standards for about ground storage, and because all hazardous material handlers may not be easily identified, the County shall do the following; A. Revise Division 3 0( the Uniform Environmental Health Code to establish above ground storage standards for hazardous materiels. The ordinance shall include, but not be limited to, the following requirements: - secondary containment of substances; - segregation of incompatible materials; - storage of hazardous substances restricted to an area with a surface impervious to the substanec; - methods to Drevent run-off of rain water and/or collection of rain water if area is not covered; - fencing and/or other security of the area with adequate signs present to inform of the presence of hazardous materials; - emergency equipment Io be stored onsi:c as aDPropriatc ieg. DroDer absorbent to deal w;th a spill or an appropriate neutralizing agent); and - minimum storage distances from adjacent land uses. B, Establish a system for identifying all handlers of hazardous substances with such measures ar review of telephone directories and other business listings; exchange of information with city code enforcement officers, Incal fire agencies, and city business license offices; and field surveys as necessary. C. Review periodically each place of business registered in the hazardous material handler program to verify the hazardous substance inventory on tilt and to advise the handler of salt storage practices. ~ rn-vv IiEC-u-E iia k;na Uridc rkrGVrid SiGiure ianki [hti'aiiG 4ru wrdwatcr resources, the County shall do [he following: A. Amend the underground storage tank ordinance to maintain its consistency with state and Ccderal requirements. E$-31 ~~ B. Continue to enforce the Uniform Environmental Health Code by such measures as Dlan r<view and inspection of new tank installations, inspection of existing tanks at Itast once rvery three years, and inspection at all mnk removals. C. Maintain records of tank performance by reviewing on- going monitoring programs to evaluate whether carrcnt requirements provide adequate Drot<ction, or whether areas with high groundwater (at 30 feet or less) require more stringent protection. D. Develop a Memor¢ndum of Understanding (MOU) with each oC the three Regional Water Quality Control Boards which identii ies the respective duties of the Water Board and the DEHS «garding oversight of mitigation efforts. E. Prepare an annual report detailing the number of tanks under permit with the County, the nature of their contents, monitoring programs in use, the number of faciliti<s irspec[ed, and a listing of sites where an unauthorized release has occurred and its clean-up status. P/A-6-4 Because certain home occupations use and store hazardous materials and the use and storage of hazardous materials in rtsitlential areas may pose a threat to the public, this jurisdiction shall continue [o prohibit businesses under a Home Occupation Permit to store hazardous materials for commercial . ::d:.".!(°~ .. ... Vinlo rin„~ of r6ia nnlirv ahnll be subject to enforcement action by the local jurisdiction and/or (ire authority. In addition, [he County shall eoord inate with cities in developing a list of home occupations that use hazardous materials or generate hazardous waste within city jurisdictions, The list shall be distrihuted to city and county planning departments. ES•32 ~/ V CHAPTER 7 REGULATORY PROGRAM FOR GENERATORS (Including Transporters and new TSD Facilities) The federal law governing hazardous waste management, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), originally exempted hazardous waste gcncrators producing less than 1000 kg (2200 Ibs) per month of hazardous waste from compliance with that law, The 1784 amendments to Rt"R A, (the Hazardous and Solid waste Amcndmtats of 1994, HSWA), lowered the czemption threshold so that businesses producing more than 100 kg (220 Ibs) per month of hazardous waste are now subject to RCRA. California has taken a different approach. California has never had any threshold value for determining compliance with the hazardous waste management requirements. .4ny business which products a hazardous waste must manage that waste in accordance with state requirements regardless of the amount produced. Although many of [he California Taws have been in effect since the seventies, local enforcement of [hest laws began in 1983 with the MOU agreement. In September of 1983, [he DEH$ entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Health Services. Through this MOU, DEHS agreed to monitor all businesses who generate or produce hazardous waste within the County to ensure that they comply with all state laws and regulations pertaining to the generation and management of hazardous was[[. Approximately 2100 businesses have been identified as gcncrators of _ _,. -, ,,,.- .. vim, ,,,.. ,. Extensive efforts (such as "door to door"sweeps, compilingylists Hof businesses likely to generate hazardous waste based on Standard Idcnti(ication Classification Codes) were undertaken by DEHS to identify generators, Dcspitt these efforts, [he DEHS estimates that there may be as many as 500 more hazardous waste generators doing business within the County which the DEHS has yet to identify. Additional m<asures are necessary to identify all generators. Tht business license and renewal form is recommended in this plan because of its success in many counties and cities when used as a screening tool for determining whether businesses handle hazardous waste. Educational assistance, assistance with disposal of waste, and consideration of the needs of the limited quantity generator (produce less Shan 5 gallons or 50 pounds of hazardous waste) must all be addressed in order to ensure e ._. _..,.. _., ply .... a ... , ~ og:ams. ES-33 5~/ GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G-7-1 To ensure [hat all businesses in the County that use hazardous materials and generate hazardous waste properly manage these substances. G-7-2 To provide hazardous waste generators with [he necessary tools [o comply with existing regulations by continuing generator education and technical assistance efforts. G-7-3 To determine the need for and feasibility of providing disposal assistance to small quantity generators, Politics/Actions PiA-7-1 Hccausc hazardous waste generators need a permit from DEHS and such a permit requirement ensures on-going compliance with regulations, and because not all hazardous waste generators have been identified in this County, this jurisdiction shall continue its efforts to identify hazardous waste generators by using field surveys and instituting cooperative efforts with fire agencies to exchange information. P/A-7-2 Because a consistent method of identifying businesses that use and genra;c hazardous ubs;ances must be in place, jurisdiction shall use a business license (or similar rcquirtmenQ and its annual renewal to determine whether businesses handle ha zardnus substances. This nolicv shall he implemented by the Collowing actions: A. Development of an agreement with all incorporated cities within the County to ensure That questions regarding the use of hazardous materials anA the generation of hazardous waste are included on both the city's business license application form and its business license renewal form. -fhc information obtained from these questions shall be shared with the DEHS. B. Initiation of a business license or similar requirement Cor the unincorporated portions of the County to be used for information retrieval purposes, Questions shall request information on [he use of hazardous materials and the acncratia-, of hazardDUS waste. P; A-7-3 Because many hazardous waste generators are not aware of local, state, and federal requirements, and providing information about these requirements could ensure compliance with regulations, the DENS hazardous waste compliance program shall continue to include a strong emphasis on educational assistance to hazardous waste generators. Every effort shall be ES-34 51a- made to make these programs accessible to all areas of the County. The following actions shall be taken t~ achieve this policy: A. DEHS shell continue to publish a Quarterly newsletter providing the latest information on new laws and « gulations afCcctiag hazardous waste generators. B. DEHS shall continue to Dublish and update the San Bernardino County Hazardous Waste Generator's Handbook which includes information on avplicable reeulations, contacts at other regulatory agencies, and resources such as the waste exchange, recyclers and haulers available to generators. C. DEHS shall continue to sponsor workshops on regulatory compliance with an added effort to schedule conferences in the desert portion oC the County. P/A-7-4 Because hazardous waste generators have expressed an inures[ in having assistance with disposal of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall perform a derailed needs assessment and feasibility study for a transfer station and/or County coordination of hazardous waste Dick up in all areas of [he County. The study shall include consideration of the types of wastes needing management, opportunities for source reduction, recydirg and trca:mcnt, and the Iiketihood of private enterprise meeting this need. If an Unmet need is found, this jurisdiction shall determine the feasibility of providing that unmet nttd. ES•?5 5(~ CHAPTER 8 LAND USE REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLERS Public concern exists regarding the potential threat to areas surrounding busincsscs which use hazardous materials and generate hazardous wastes, particularly with regard to [he distance of such businesses to residential and immobile populations as well as major drinking water aquifers. While land use or zoning regulations provide a mechanism (or siting indut[rial and commercial dcvciopmen[, the use of hazardous substances by uisting busincsscs may not be considered when changes to land use or zoning arc adopted or residential development is approved, Consequently, residential areas may be sited near these businesses (or vice versa). To address this concern, information on the amount and type of hazardous materials and wastes used by new or modified businesses should be part of the discretionary review process. Development standards (or the review of new or modified businesses should also be established. A two stage approach is necessary for the proper siting of businesses that use hazardous materials and generate hazardous waste. The (first consists of requiring preliminary information regarding hazardous materials and waste management practices at the time of application submission. The second requires that [his preliminary information be documented as specified in state law through a completed business Dlan, waste minimization plan, and, if applicable, a Risk Management Prevention Program. These plans would be completed prior to final approval of the land use apnlication. All businesses are subject to [he requirement for these plans whether or not they arc filing for a land use application. GOALS AND POLICIES(ACTIONS The following goals and policies/anions require the adoption of regulations for the consideration of new or modified businesses using hazardous materials and generating hazardous waste. G03I5 G-B-I To ensure [hat busincsscs locating within the County incorporate available risk management and waste minimization practices into their oDCrations. G-8-2 To minimize the risk of exposure to hazardous substances by the residential and immobile Vopulations, Policies/Actions PiA-6-I Because information regarding the amounts and types of hazardous materials used and hazardous waste generated are important factors to consider when siting new development or reviewing existing businesses, this jurisdiction shall; ES-36 ~/ I) Amend the Development Code (zoning ordinance) to: a) require neu basin:. -s to submiC detailed information regarding [he ,counts and types of hazardous materials used and hazardous wastes generated, the business procedures implemented to manage these hazardous substances, and the emergency procedures employed in the event of an accident. The applicant must demonstrate that the business operations are consistent with hazardous ma«rial/waste legislation. b) require new or modified businesses to complete a business Dlan, waste minimization plan, and, if applicable, a Risk Management and Prevention Program prior to final approval of a land use permit for a new business or modification of an existing business. The requirements specified in AB 377? (Chapter 1260, Statutes of 1986) and AB 3205 (Chapter I5, Statutes of 1988) regarding the applicability of the RMPP shall be identified in the amendment, The plans shall be submitted to the County DENS for review and approval. 2) Expand outreach efforts to city and County planning agencies, city and County building and safety departments, and the real estate industry regarding new planning and reporting requirements as well as the identification of the types of businesses which may be affected by !hose requirements. Such a program should include [hc development of brochures and flyers describing the requirements and an identification of types of businesses .. ,...,, o,e Gi.viy ro nanq« acu«iy nazardous materials. P/A-8-2 Because Certain quantities of acutely hazardous materials could pose a threat [o the public health and safety and the en vironmcnt, this jurisdiction shall amend the Development Code (zoning ordinance) to require a conditional use permit fo: all businesses or governmental facilities handling acutely hazardous materials in excess of 55 gallons, 500 bounds, or 200 cubic feet. P/A-8-3 Because inappropriately sited industrial facilities post a threat to the public, end because zoning ordinances do not identify quantity or use limitations for hazardous material/waste, and identifying restrictions could address future concerns with [hc siting of industrial facilities handling hazardous material/wa<rr 'ha iu; isdic•' - - - aiuaic the feasibility el establishing siting criteria that •identify [hc types and amounts of materials allowed within particular zoning designations. The study shall identify a list of chemicals and appropriate thresholds which would cause a business to be subject tq specific land use restrictions, recommend changes in the Development Codc (zoning ordinance) for review of such industries, and identify ES•37 /~ the advantages and disadvantages of implementing such an orG ina ncc, Eg•38 S/~ CHAPTERS HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE Household products can be classified into five general groups: household cleaners, automotive products, home maintenance and improvement products, lawn and garden products, and miscellaneous items like batteries or Doel chemicals. These products arc common household items. They are often Ciscarded improperly because most individuals do no[ recognize their potcntisf danger. Improper disposa! of household hazardous waste (IUIW) may lead to injury to refuse collectors and equipment damage, and when disDOSCd [o land, HHW may contaminate soil or groundwater. Disposal to landfills, storm drains, sanitary sewer systems, and the ground, as well as evaporation and storage of these products, can lead to human health and environmental concerns. In 1984 the County of San Bernardino establish<d a comprehensive Drogram for addressing the HHW problem. The program began as a pilot project under a grant from the California Waste Resource Control Board. The study dealt with the feasibility of separating HHW from the municipal waste Stream and disposing of it properly. The County opened two permanent collection centers in February, 1985 as part of the grant project, one at the County Agricultural Commissioner's office in San Bernardino and the other at the Central Valley Fire Station in Fontana. Based on the success of [he pilot program, the Hoard of Supervisors approved County Funding to continue the program and subsequently approved funding to expand [he Drogram. The County HHW management program includes: o Five permanent year-round collection centers. o One-day collection programs called "Round-Ups" in areas of the County not served by the existing collection centers. o One-day publicity and collection "events" to publicize and encourage [he use of existing centers. o An on-going Dubl is ed ucalion and information effort [o increase public awareness of HHW issues and also provide educational materials to schools and interested groups. With the location of only five permanent collection centers County wide, there are vast areas of the County which are not being fully served b> t,.,] progral ~. - - d popWa, iiy of iirnc evenis ha: increased the number of users lto ~a~DOint where storage size of the San Bernardino site may not he adequate. New parmanen[ collection centers may be added to the Drogram since the Round-Up events are very labor intensive. The Round-Up events require trained personnel to accept, sm't, and package large amounts of waste Por processing (recycling, treatment, or disposal) in a fixed amount of time. Alternative measures to expand the ES-39 S~~ program should also be considered, however. The Drogram should be ezpandcd to include collec[icn centers a[ landfills, enforcement efforts at landfills to discourage improper disposal, and continued public education efforts. Partin Dation by the County Solid Waste Management Department is recommended. 1:rOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS CiOLIa G-9-I To ensure [he effective management and disposal of household hazardous waste County-wide. G-9-2 To Drohibit unauthorized disposal of household hazardous waste in facil itics that handle wastes. G-9-3 To inform the public about the need (or proDCr disposal of household hazardous waste and to inform the public of [hc availability of the collection centers. Policies/Actions P/A-9-I Because recent studies at municipal landfills show evidence of contamina•ion from hazardous wastes, this jurisdiction shall establish a strong enforcement program to prevent disposal of household hazardous waste in municipal refuse facilities. P/A-9-2 Because household hazardous waste is disposed at local landfills and because a strong enforcement program will detect significant mm~unu n( Anu enF nld Fn+ .An rA:n ndb X6+11 develop household hazardous was[en diversion-programs^at all facilities where waste is handled, to properly manage these wastes. Whenever possible, collection centers should be established a[ appropriate facilities with public access. P%A-9-i Because the capacity at collection centers can not accommodate the needs of the entire County and the diversion program will add to the amount of hazardous wastes requiring special management, this jurisdiction shall address the County's needs in effectively managing household hazardous waste by establishing a larger transfer and processing facility. P/A-9-4 Because public education efforts have alerted the public about proper methods for disposal of household hazardous waste as welt as the avaiiahiiiiv of household eniiectinn cenrers. anA because there is a need to continue these efforts for County- wide public awareness, this jurisdiction shall continue its comprehensive public education program. ES-40 S/ ~ CHAPTER 10 TR ANSPOK ~TIO' Hazardous waste is transported by truck out of the County to treatment, recycling, and disposal facilities, and ioto the County from other areas for treatment. In 19g6, San Bernardino County exported about 41,000 tons of hazardous waste; hazardous waste imported into the County comprised about 9,000 tons. While no curreri[ estimates exist for transport of hazardnus materials, national estimates suggest [hat transportation of hazardous waste is relatively insignificant compared to the amount of hazardous materials transported. These hazardous materials become hazardous waste when spilled in the environment. Federal and state agencies are responsible for the development and enforcement of the transportation regulations throughout the state, Federal and State legislation require [ht proper id<ntification of transported materials, set minimum standards for cargo containers, and require that hazardous waste be tracked from generation to ultimam dispose I. The use of the uniform manifest/shipping papers, placarding of transportation vehicles, vehicle safety inspections and the use of a uniform format (or reporting incidents which involve a hazardous material release, have resulted Crom these regulations. Although fedora: and state agencies are responsible for the development and enforcement of transportation regulations, the local jurisdiction can have a role [n the transportation of hazardous materiali waste iu the County. The local jurisdiction may designate routes, restrict hours of transportation, institute notification requirements for certain categories of ~aa u Y, --~„~I ..A .. _..., elnn~lina ,n Il,a transportation of •yhazardous material; waste. ^~In^ addition, the local jurisdiction may implement road mitigation measures, such as repair of roadways, to reduce the risk of transporting hazardous materials/wastes. Federal law preempts any state or local requirement which is inconsistent with the requirements oC the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA). A state or local requirement may not be preempted if the DOT (or the courts) determines that the stale or local requirement provides an equal or greater level of protection to the public than the federal requirement. Federal law specifies, however, that the state or local requirement cannot unreasonably burden commerce, GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS the r~ltpq,~ng ono ly s nniir i~5 is rtinne adrirecc the need to nuUrc cafe transportation of hazardous waste through the County. Goals G-10-I To ensure the safe transportation of hazardous materials and waste in and through San Bernardino County. ES•41 5/9 Policiu/Actions P/A-IO-I Hccause safe transportation of hazardous waste is an important goal oC existing state law and local jurisdictions, sper,(icd hazardous waste facilities shall use routes that can safely accommodate additional truck traffic, do nor pass through residential areas, and use interstate or state divided highways as major routes, P/A-10.2 Because local jurisdictions can have a role in the safe transportation of hazardous waste, this turisdic[ion shall establish a task force whose Durpose is to develop proposals for specifying routes for hazardous waste transport, identi lying limitations Cor scheduling times of day and days of [he week, types of wastes that can be transported, and the need fnr notification requirements. Aiso, the task force shall further assess the routes of concern (Highways 58, 62, 71, and I-IS). The task force should be composed of members of the Dublic, City, County, and regional transportation planners, cmerg<ncy response personnel, and industry with expertise in transportation of hazardous substances. P/A-10-3 Because specified hazardons waste facilities must have acecss to salt transportation routes, this jurisdiction shall require applicants for specified hazardous waste Cacilities to fund an analysis of transportation concerns (sec policy action P/A-S- 4(5)(d) Chapter S). 7.hc transpo; :aticr, siudy shall p~o~ide a description and analysis of the projected volumes of hazardous waste transported into and through the County. The transportation task force identified in nnlicv/action P/4-tn-~ shall participate with local government staff in developing the scope of the study. The study shall include, but not be limited to: • An identification o! all reasonably available highway and railway routes in the Southern California region and the development and comparison of the risk associated with the alternate routes; • A comparison of [he risk associated with transporting hzzardous waste in different truck and rail cargo tanks; • An identification of rout[-specific, risk-reducing measures for each route examined; and • An iA[.^.!1f 1Ca11^.. ^d `JS;patly Giv.C'u ura ii.c.. training, routing,^curfews), technological (i.e., equipment innovation), and external risk-reducing measures (i.e., road improvements, emergency responac improvements) to transport hazardous waste by truck and by rail, P/A-10-4 Because Dlanning for safe transportation of hazardous waste is a regional concern, this jurisdiction shall work with regional ES-42 S~ transportation planners in ensuring that local issues are addressed in regional transDOrtr ~on plans P/A-10-5 Because stale highways sre used to transport hazardous wastes through the County and it is necessary to maintain highways in goad condition, this jurisdiction shall participate with regional, state, and federal governments in determining priorities (or funding and repair of highways in the County. P/A-10-6 Because transport of hazardous waste on local roads has not bet.^. coasidcred, this ju:is^_iction sha!I study srd develop transDOrta Lion and routing plans for the ere nsport of hazardous wastes within urban areas. P/A-10-7 Because knowledge about safe transportation of hazardous waste as will as a[ate end federal transportation regulations is important for proper management of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall continue its education program for hazardous waste generators. The program shall include in (or ma[ion on proper labeling, placarding, an4 manifesting requirements. P/A-10-8 Because transportation of hazardous materials is an important issue that needs further consideration, and because current plans do not address [ht transportation of hazardous matt ria is and these materials are transported through the County on a regular basis, this jurisdiction shall require the task force identified in Policy P/A-10.2 to consider transportation of hazardous materials issues as well as those of hazardous waste. ES-43 a/ CHAPTER 11 ENFORCEMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Enforcement and emergency response are two critical elements necessary for the effective management of hazardous waste and materials. The County's en Corcement program ensures compliance with hazardous material/waste regulations by conducting both investigation and, possibly, litigation of potential violations. The emergency response pregrar.!, the other hand, consists of an emergency response team composed of active trained personnel and a model emergency response plan (Area Plan) that identifies the resources and responsible agencies in the event of an emergency. These programs are critical because [hey ensure eomDiia nee with hazardous material/waste regulations and the local jurisdiction's preparedness in the event oC an accidental spill or release. Also, important to proper management of hazardous material/waste are inspection and monitoring efforts. These issues arc discussed in Chapters 6 and 7, GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G-II-1 To ensure the safe management of hazardous substances within San Bernardino County. G-ii-2 To continue providing a comprehenstvc response to emergency situations in order to protect public health and safety and the environment. 11.4.2 Policies/Actions PA-II-I Bcca use consistent, periodic inspections of hazardous waste generators in the County ensures compliance with hazardous material/waste regulations, the County shall continue to conduct a hazardous waste generator and hazardous material handler inspection program. The program shall emphasize education and technical assistance to hazardous material handlers and hazardous waste generators regarding regulatory requirements and waste minimization. Every effort shall be made [o implement this program in all areas of the County. P/A-1 L2 Because inspection and enforcement efforts are conducted by several different agencies and a combined enforcement program maw rnn~rc rnnrinnrri rnm niinn . nv nna,n.~a.~ ,n. r,,....,.. the County shall continue to coordinate enforcement efforts with the State Department of Health Services, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the Air Quality Management Districts, and other federal, state, and local agencies, P'A-II-3 Because enforcement efforts provide a mechanism for ensuring compliance with hazardous material/waste regulations, the ES-44 S ~~ County shall continue to food the enforcement program through permit fees. P/A-1I-4 Because emergency respor. x' procedures involve several dii (crept agencies, the County shall develop an on-going awarcncss program that informs the police, fire, and other egcncics about the procedures and responsibilities specified in the Hazardous Materials Response Area Plan. P/A-11-5 Because the County has significant exDCr[ise in coordinating responses to emergencies, the County shall continuc to be the coordinating agency for the tn[cragcncy Response Team. P/A-11.6 Because response to an emergency requires [rained, expericnccd personnel, the Interagency Response Team shall continuc its advanced response ca Debility training. ES-45 ~~ CHAPTER 12 SITE MITIGATION AND LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION The prevalence of hazardous materials and products has been widespread throughout [he County and cities, as these products arc commonly used in our society. The consumer demand for [hcse materials requires that businesses handling hazardous materials and generating hazardous waste he located in every jurisdiction. Such materials and wastes have been produced and handled for many years, and accidental releases of these materials have created a multitude of contaminated sites. The most common threat associated with these sites is [he potential movement of hazardous contaminants through the land to water supplies, particularly groundwater aquifers. Other problems associated wi¢h contaminated sites include: toxic emissions, improper land use in areas on or surrounding contaminated sites, and short or long term risk to public health and safety. Several Cederal, state, and local programs have been developed to identify, characterize, and ultimately mieigate contamination and potential negative impacts at [hcse sites. These programs have resulted in several lists which identify sites targeted by each program. These lists often duplicate each other, although considerable diCferenees occur among the lists. While data are bring compiled on these sites, they are incomplete because there are difficulties in [racing boundaries of operation, finding responsible parties, and fully assessing the extent of the potential contamination. The ovatlablc data arc maintained by many separate agencies, and risk determinations and mitigation methodologies arc not yet completed (or most of these sites. In addition, these lists may change as sites arc a ~ •.~ ~:~:.....A The objectives of some oC Ihese programs and their resultant site lists are to ensure that jurisdictions are aware of these sites, that timely and complete cleanup occurs, and that proper impact review is conducted as a part of the development/land use review process. When data on hazardous waste generation projected from cleanup efforts are made available by the responsible agency, i[ will be included in the data analysis section in (utu re revisions of this Plan, However, most sites have not yet been evaluated by the responsible agency. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS The following goals and politics/actions address the need to coordinate activities related to site mitigation and long term remedial action. Goals G-12-I To ensure that all jurisdictions arc aware of all identified contaminated sites within San Bernardino County. G-12-2 To ensure that timely and complete cleanup occurs at contaminated sites. ESS-46 ~" ~~ G-123 To ensure that environmental rcvitw is conducted for projects roposed on sites which have been ir., ratified as contaminated. Policies/Actions P/A-12-1 Because current information on she location and status of Cleanup of corttamipated sites is of vital importanec for development in the County, and because the OCfice of Planning and Research (OPR) List is not frequently updated nor does it provide details as ti. the contamination nr status of cleanu D, this jurisdiction shall develop a contaminated sites data bast that provides geographical, physical, and land use characteristics for use by applicants end industry. In addition, the County Department of Environmental Health Services (DEHS) shall u Dilate the OPR list on a periodic basis and provide s DEHS updated list to each jurisdiction. The pEHS updated list shall also be used 6y [his jurisdiction to assist in idcntiCying contaminatcd sites associated with land use applications. During DEHS preparation of an updated list, the following may be included: a) information on site contamination and its applicability to different tyDCS of tlevclopment to assist cities and applicants, b) information rcgarding the current cleanup status of contaminated sites, and c) addition of Biros to the OPR list. When DEHS proposes to add a site to the OPR list, pEHS shall required before a site is listed^~The owner shalrhave IS days from the date of [his notice to make a written request for a Administrative Hearing rcgarding the proposed listing. When requested, a hearing shall be held prior to listing a site as contaminatcd. P/A-12-2 Because cleanup of contaminated sites is a complex task which involves multiple agencies, DEHS shall monitor and work cooperatively with all agencies involved in site assessment and rcmediation. pEHS shall consider developing a Memorandum of Understanding with state and regional agencies to provide assistance and oversight of monitoring, assessment and/or remtdiation activities. P.A-i2-3 occauae the merhnA ni rrmnriia_r{nn _ .~.. County and cities in conjunction with the State Department of Health Services shall encourage onsite treatment end remtdiation to reduce the transport of hazardous waste from contaminatcd sites, and should insure appropriate remediatiors are tom Dleted to provide permanent remedies. ES•47 say P/A-12.4 Because site remediation activities require coordination and expertise, DEHS shall implement a sift assessment and remediation program and develop a program to enhance training of personnel in site assessment and mitigation techniques, and risk asscssmcnt techniques. P/A-12-5 Because site assessment and remediation creates costs [o the local agencies, the County should investigate funding possibilities for cleanup activities. This should consider how local agencies can recover full or partial payment from responsible parties for cleanup of contaminated sites, reduce the duplication of effort among all agencies, and minimize the cos[ of work. The County and cities should support legislation that def incs the responsible party in regard to the asscssmcnt and cleanup of contaminated sites, as well as legislation [hat improves access to state and federal Superfunds to cleanup orphan sites. DEHS should seek state funding for underground storage tank remedia Lion programs, P/A-I2-6 Because state law does not specify local actions or procedures for projects proposed at a location listed by the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) as a contaminated site, and impacts may result [o the public health and safety, and because development on contaminated sites may preclude future environmental remediation this jurisdiction shall amend the Development Code to implement the following as a Dart of the development review and permit issuance process: a) require a preapplica[ion meeting for all development/land ....n,..,:~n. +r b.~e •:nne I:e..A 6v nPR m f1FHC b) require all development/land use applications at locations listed by OPR or DENS to be subject [o discretionary conditional use review of this jurisdiction, ezeept when deemed not necessary by this jurisdiction. Exemption from discretionary review shall be based on the scope of Iht project and the nature of the contamination. P/A•12-7 Because this jurisdiction has a concern with prober cleanup and funding for cleanup of contaminated sites, this jurisdiction shall do the following: a) Recommend, by «solution, to federal legislative representatives that legislation be developed to require ivna rr mrm ni iref enee in inciuuc silo cieanuu and tG SEi aside money for cleanup (at present cost) as part of bast closure plans, and b) Require that aclean-up plan which includes the source of funding be submitted [o DEHS for review and approval b<fore new or alternative land uses are undertaken. ES-48 ~a~ CHAPTER 13 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND PAR :CITATION An effective public participation program depends on early and continued planning to generate input from abroad cross section of the population and the regulated community. The overall public participation program for the CHWMP allowed for public input on concerns and priorities; suggestions for alternatives and new strategies; and review and assessment cf C: opescd mcasurs. An effort was made to inform and encourage participation from the general Dublic, civic, environmental and business organizations, the cities and agencies within the County, and the regulated community. Also, the services of a public participation coo-dinator were secured to assist department staff in implementing a public involvement program. An extra effort was made to get input by early November to meet the December 3I, 1987, Draft Plan deadline. Preparation of the final CHWMP repuired additional Dublic involvement efforts. The CHWMP public participation program consisted of the following elements. ongoing advisory committee input distribution of newsletters distribution of an informative brochure a series of public workshops a speakers bureau and slide presentation media coverage distribution of 3000 copies of the draft plan summary and about 750 copies of the Uraft CHWMP a series of pubic hearings on the Draft CHWMP aucccasi ut impiemen to uon of the LH WMP will depend on continuing public education on the importance of proper hazardous waste management. Continued efforts in this area will need to focus on public involvement in the implementation of the programs spccif ied in the CHWMP and on public participation in the review of proposals for specified hazardous waste (acil hies. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Public participation should take place throughout the implementation of the CHWMP programs as well as when applications for specified hazardous waste facilities are received. The following goals end policies!actions ensure continued efforts in involving the Dublic. Goals G-13-I To continue public participation end Dublic education in the implementation of the programs Identified in the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. G-13.2 To include Dublic involvement in the review of aPDlica[ions for specified hazardous waste facilities. ES-49 Ja7 Policits/Actions P/A-13-I Because public participation and education is important for the preparation and review of the CHWMP, the County shall establish an ongoing Hazardous Waste Management Advisory Committee to review reports on implementation of the Dlan, to consider new program directions, to guide a continued public education program, and to assist in revising and updating the Hazardous Waste Management Plan. F/A-134 Because aia:e law re~uirea :he fvrmatiu^ of a Local Asessneri Committee (LAC) within 90 days after receiving an NOI, this jurisdiction shall establish by ordinance politics and procedures for the formation of the Committee, the selection of members, and the role of the LAC in regard to other decision-making bodies. ES-50 ~~~ CHAPTER 10 IMPLEMENTATION OF CHWh~ PROGRAMS The CHWMP recommends several programs which address the County's goals regarding effective hazardous waste management. In order to achieve these goals, reasonable efforts must be made to implement CHWMP programs. Implementation depends on the establishment of program priorities, the identification oC Cunding sources, and [hc devetopmcnt of 2 schedule for impkme:.ta:ion. The programs recommended in this Plan were separated into Three categories for implementation: immediate, first year, and second year implementation. The categories represent both the priority for implementation and the proposed implementation schedule. The programs placed in the immediate category reflect those programs that provide the needed foundation for future County programs; they are the highest priority programs. Programs placed in [he first and second vear implementation category ere also important but can be delayed because of concerns with funding or because issues related to these programs have been addressed by programs identified in the immediate category. The priorities may change, however, based on the availability of funding, changes in local attitudes, and the recognition of new conditions. Some programs like the ordinance amendments may be implemented all at once if staff and funding sources exist. The attached table summarizes [he information regarding implementation of the recommended programs. The implementation schedule, responsible agencies, resource needs, and potential funding sources have all been wajw iry vi rim prugra ms Wui OC funded Dy perRUt tees. Some of uthcr programs are one-time (i.e., ordinance amendments) efforts that can be absorbed into on-going County projects, others like the transportation studies require the identification of funding sources. The table presents the County's best estimate of potential funding sources. ES-51 5a5 ~ y MCO o •.G uW 0. SgWtlq •] D46~F pH 04M]• 5U 4.14 •q pW g9VN4 hO 55UWN 4 • u y .-1 a4C ./149F 9~~C u P SNN4 NVOY ]1"WN 04 H ti •Yei C NCMOV gg04V 55WP4 • 4 4 >~ 7 4 P L C -Ci 4 a W C4.0 •1 a M b eoY ati u u N v Y p P40 e4Cq NqY ~ O Y N O 4 ~ p~. 4 Y W J O m~ 4.Yi 000 d 1.1 W 0. V 4 U Y C K K b z H W N y K G F N SW Z W E5 N Wb V~ 5 W R. q O H w 4 U pO I 4 0 2 CLC W •] Oly V 5y n•DO 9 V 9 / .bi SO m u Y A b 4YY MTm 4b0 a .1 YaA NOti 9 p r u U w N a u C tl W C YA q % v/iF C y / m w a N F W O YX u Y a~ C N q O~ q N YNN CVV uu•~i b4Y V Pq MOC pp~ M•n H 6 S9r O p~Y O•N CO/ N90N x .°+ q° c jnO4 4 W 0.Y O .1 b N H O.uq~ NFCa W O 4 O 4 O 4 O 1 H 0 O q V Y q q CMC CNG CSC O H V V H A ! 9 ems ?~~ ? m~ g Q~N 6NH ^ bGMN Q O D 01 r1 O tl y q Y~/ 0 T . 1 Y A Y N ~ Y • U 90q . I M ] ) C M ^UC / Y4 4 U V tlD4 Y S S tl a D 4CUN H ~ N L I OCgN] / ~ N M ry~G Gu N • >. tlOq .1 U 10Y-1C UMMpq O G S OP YO OU C 4V tl Y M N MY4MY .7 ® qN CY~L q q Y N 4 g Y Y .1 Y • W V • Y q ri • O N Y M U V q Z P ^ N Y q D q 9 p 9+1 9 O • '$> Oy~ p ~1 O C U b 04 b q••Ai CG O ] tl P] Y.1 O L • q 4 b q M L H O P / '+ N Y U O Y 1 ^ C„J q A M H V• qN eeN 9• J tl NqM » • T1• C U q C V Y O Nq Y'N % Y / Y] •'•1 O N M M Y M N Y Y V q nl O S M O Y C M NYN• • 9p gYCNA /'1 >q ~ • O NY 6Y %q 'OOUP C LO OqO y ~ U Y 4 9 q O O> g Y N YI > q • d p 9 Y UO •~ P44 A q NMY ..U 0VN A %]bN M .1N O .1J I q NN WYq U~ /N 0 L•q4 NY „ q <G UL4 Y N 'U OC 1 rl 1• rlG 0.•.14 q YV N•n 1 C ' WN'N V NO CNL W "b NYG6 '~•d .. •• N N?q/q "/ .iqT •d -5 .. •1 .1qq s~~ rv h ti ,H N 1 4 V 69 Q q V ~I C Y .. m C 6 O y i VO n ~~ A N / a 9 C ~ ^ q m m .. . c i q m m 0. 4 3 / a n u v V O a r7 YyNe qC yVJ[YH 4 Ni N V J'4 . 4 qN> TU my J ~ C9i y/YLGOmIC ~ m04.1 04UbL aC-~ N W m"10-1 UmC UYgO/ O F O Y 9 g q .~. g P O q 4 q .~ 1 ~ Y U WUGV HigV PV^~4 U4 a n ay OC 4 ~ ppp •~ 9 D N0 d> NNVC % e H m U W q 9 O rl q V 9 .u0 iH 0 dNU m 3 0y 4 / LYOV qa V N Y Z•'0 91 q ~ 4 >> Gb l Iq PUV N ey ° 6 G N y u a o • y G J / O y f l ~rn~ 0 -~ 9 -14 C g m H f~ W ~-1/-Iq l6 W Oq HU S m4U V O q ti _ H : ,y m u x ~s N .m ~ N N m W U u Z R4 WU O p 4 4 0 G O H D N O H 0 ~ ti I [y C J J q 9 0 L 9 % ~ 9 Y +~ Z W C Uq0 9H0 ~° 0NY ?m~ ' ~ aim 4.. m 0 0.~ I ~ y ^N dd% HW [Yi M K SNH m / o a • ~/ G i q o D . i C ~. I N 04Y y y I N I ~ y Y W C m V u 0'-1 U q OGyy / u 4 {( C G qym / / ti 4 0 6 O y q /yUi I S ^ 41' M• O VH ~ MU p ~~~~pC pCpCpC~NO 2 4 qV4 q ~q~Y. N a9tl >~ U C ' Y C•4> p N ~ g 00 0 O J 6 4CgY y .y C4 J g N / V.w VGq O v ~ ~q N/q 4 V/^ 4 w 0 J L qG ~YC m J q 9U~y 4 Om 9 Uq N4aC p M WN N ~q 0. CYY 0 C SNV W Y > 0 UO Nq ~ .. yN ~ p mti 6M 4ti U0 `l ~ Y I ~9 1 O N a C9 H O p G Si 1 CY9 pU .4 ~ ..YC V W n6 •~Mq •yU90 ~ nH) qv S3/ h cV z +J ; ~ / ~'~. , ° E ~ u W W W c' N 4 N f N / M q 9 A U 4 p• NN mN 00 dU VV dd as uW uw uw a L U C m tr eq q . ~ y uX On - i4 O•A O 6 N / S/ V O / 4 T m Y2G94 YOgI• ypy 4y7 ry 4S0 m / P V m u i m 9N 0 o . J N Y Y bO N OWy 4WT yyVq Ad NO/ / 6 ON NY C Y 4t O WO/ C OGG/V / C / W ~U•v N T e 'Od ` F 0 4 U Y E o P. ~+ q 1 ~ .N y K J L .-1 L N 2 L n y~ %~ O p N q N V ~4 q ~-: y 9 NW C9 %U y O q W W/ p N U ~] ~•1 0 W 9 U L/ OU; X W 7 K G 0 0 w ,a x ° ~ ~' a a o/x LW N da H ii k W C U 9 W $ M / tt O N a u W2 . N d Nq + • m W N Y h N W x G ~ x m W G W U ~~1 4t F. 'N W L 4 F O C O C O C O Y 0 4 0 Y O N H V 9 -I V Y S WNy aNq VNq F 2 'n q a~ CWC +~ n p GCCIC ~ q a C W a C: Y V N U N U Y ' w 0 ~ L V E tP. E / pt L' . .1 L 1 ON^ I O ObN w j V 1+ 'J. U N 1 V M 1 Ix-l u, IXwl-P~I K4~gi KwM 4 1 ~v a• / k ~ - .. a• 4 . i 9 N V q V N ` a C N V W C 'J 4 q C ,'J c ~ l: /C N~•1 110: 4a0 vt J V~•~ uq VH o NJ VN n qH q o0~0 O UN W 1.9 9• C N 4N N d G C U H 1 P~ .1 T / / N N V 9 O C p V N O 4 q ~1 O q q C •^o '~ Av r 'L h ~ 7 q fl U J i C - :] b UO ..: b q .~ O V T V/ K P 'n N N/ O [Y T./ ~ ~ A qw u -+s CN/ u q Ake m N X .t G TP V vl •O g U C .~ 'J y N C -1 N J JOI q/ w N .~ x Oq nN 9VC M YP' 00 Eq /U VI q Tf A /] O N q p O 4 S] U N q T~ q •N W t•1 r( H q L C O N/ W V q q m H 6 '0 k 1 / V V y t, V N m r. / d N a W .N f N~ O n N] n O W ~~ 4 ry A C 4 ~n f, ^ ~ n } 0 N L G W V/ .. q / N 9 m vl C 1. / a H n 4 U N 1 U Y U ^ 1 q O N pR "N .~• Nl: nLJ `~ .In N.i ..i ~q •-I/US 53~ N Lb m V ON b U T. M C N O}U m d V W d W o do V z Y c~~ w ti % N x ~ y N; G d A F b u F A O 4 w a 1f O.q9 u T l^Y >, O•u ly vi CCm q C 4 G N 4 S O 9 V -a b H d zu c as as wz FV Inmq -d 1 •n ao ao ... N O oww 4 FW Fw 0.b N I N O b O ~ G W wLL O U U 9 d ^J w.i G> 00 L' N ] dE 4`l.0 AO n Mq O OqU W u L d N U y N N 4> E >r wd U NUWn f1 +1-1 NC > P fJ OO VSO >0 HL uGwd 0 G ~U4 UNCwA N g A 4 L q U G O aq q V Guu a.~N] U owY OY Yzd od>mo ~'O L'O YOd 4NV Y/Ur1J U O 4 N u W a C~ >l U it .+ 'O C F6an r T A9>A C uE0 . g000AE = AO Y N m mH N NO NJ NV uN4 O G I!1 U C U > m 6 a 7 '/~ t'~ U L Y 6 y N b In W `u K C 1 d C l~9E] Sa C O OYN G W O6•ti k N LI V V N w ~4G1 n m O x '~ W f H ; 0 r i N iy O o Pr X N y N W tW~ IX ~ ~ u (]U ~ _ O q N L X N I 4 C O O C 4 0 W C p p G W O F K 'J u V A '1 m4q NYq UNn F 2W Wa 'J Obi aY! q d 7qY CVC d> m +J qu f.VC u>. u CUC a>.m zu a P^+E d ov ~ e ~ m ~WU E 5 m w .- i o . + oN.y w. i w Y Hy U E O. atl H V 4 a aWti V H a a H V 4 H F W IXw G P o c a d o u u e u u u y ., m O L C ~ F ~ U U W a E C o .~.y d. i q V C H 0~ N V Or ? q O 4 O E 4 a O .1 ~ .Ci O N -NI 7 N d C O O Y 0 O m C U u M 9 O N L ~ W n Y w 7 o a ~N b~ w M a s m o mNm i A q U w ° nJgN V ~ Y qq ] 9 I I rl A„N q GaN >G bV F9 q q G-a u ~ „ d NNC V U>Nm 9 dL4 q ~1 O 9aa ~ w~ O a g N n N M :l 9gy N.y y,• N 9Y N E IN W O W'ON V N q q Pt J 4 ]A 0 a O V C O w C. 0 1000. tl ~Nv W 9 'O V O N y M OYL.v H q WN V Y K v m G.+ GNq f. flb „ N A q VHY U .1 N U a w - q„ W V Vd > ry M N4 t ' >q J PqN U ~ q P„ . O %..1 r >t a N V r. m N 0 7 .-r N d F r N H ti tl I a a~ G N N q a u ~ n 0 'J t Y u ~ o dL E 0 w w v ~ P N OU b% ~d.+1 ~d u --N f. q ..NwC ~ nu rJ IY '-' O N- a A rv N r- w '~ U'H y ra (L O'H V H q} N y N N 0 Z H d W 9 d 9 a . i M z x G GG a W % N 9I - N e i a L v ~ lu M e i d T N W 1[ Mvl i b~a C H d W a W O4 FW w Od W C 60 q 9 q•O F> O D -+4 FW H ry H ~~ O d LT 4 i T Gi dm T OC I 'n ~~} gQiLAO] aY.•i O 21 T ++ 4 M 4 N 0 •'1 q d N cyN ym•r q 4 .~ M N A 9 V4 q qW 4gNU NV O 0wq Q -D•q UCN40 dOQ pOY W >qC• OdyUOdOL W9 OGUq q d L d N W w N H L' O N N Sri U W Y ] V d Y ~ W 0 W H M y N 9 q u , C >. 0 ••v C N O. 64 q N 0 C O q D. W a F N y' Y N WwV1V /N D y D N Y]w T N 69 H a W M U 4 A 0 V1~- 1NN4 y ^ y L G -n C Y W G N G N A W W q 4 p> q W 6'1 0 V O W U W q/^JN W •i N 9O 'n6a aH C•i N9 WYON O-Y Hfi~yy9N ~ .Ta U Y2d OV GOgdX94 -O d0 q9 C'I C NqY w~HV Oy -i '1 ~ UO Y - Ow>Y N6a-I 'tl4 p Vp9 d p• y0 ND NPQ f. NgY93g0 C9M96NN N*i W Wil S O d'O W44N90 C 'tl %H004YOC y q 9 a V S I 409a4W0 %0 KT. 04G]RA WHRVONVq UFY~(C4WU Wy N U IU AV C NG yC o -Cd 4a W -1 N q !P 4a4q N D E Sdy Fl q~.1Y W N'u q S OVV C Oqq M W 31 T.' Y U H O 4 ; i+ O.-Cy NFO p 4L N NLYMY -a1 -C yl NW 5 SgfL p~4 Gy Y S W RR 0 ~FOq Ory Y lu U O r 4 H 4 r. Y r. o e W G o ` 0 o w o D w o t u onn 9 w y aye T Y c E H u E m u C~' 9^ p u U O O i-I O N'1 W .". P M ZG V U 1 bVf: md Ne NN IYHH KNH E KNFI d ([WM a v •i q q -~ n I _ _ N 0 _ C n ~ ' F q q O q q ~ U V„ O tl H O W % O 4 H 4• . W N y Cq • Cq W d.i OII dd ON P'~1 O.-! %GY q O OY„d0. 9 4 U O N Y] H q K P~ O N L ti N a g I R W A a q W / H T M• ~ tl 9 Y M 4 L C d U 4 O M - q H H H q it g v C ~ p ~ 4 N w q O L y O O p O U d F M G. N ~~ D. U A G 9 4 a H 4 ••i +i A T N N ^ 4 C ] 9 ~ 0. 4'i U G C - N H ti q 4 OCNY W tl a F/ q NOY N A WO ggV4 4 4 H \O Wp . -OiN 4bNC N O )VY qw q ddNq]'•i H O CAI L 4 .- N 4 .- a d Y 4 n G N 0 q W - J e 0 V 0 ~ q . q > C g 9 d d 4 H p N nM W ' IY U y I a VIC 14 OHOdUd •] F p U O ] E li N O A ri O W G O ~n O U q N q •i H ~ G O q n H .-• ri ) .~ 3 C/ 4 Y W K ~ M -- li u W 3 ~ r( .i 4 v ~( n q ~n O W.n 5~ ~ ~~ b h Vr W OAF a a yu j n4'-G~u A y A ,.INq 4YJC ti N . V H Y H 9~ 6/ d q d ~-I Z d.~' -1 C 1 A W J -NI a O' a 11 q .=i MYU NUU POC+M 4q S R OO'H ?~ qU-~I dmaBO] O'y ] Hw 4J4Y SNgN~Uw4C W= 'O WC pgNJ YONC4F~~m Nq N H7 ada9 gNtlJaN aJ Na OO V.YaC YUO4>l]aVH Aa pyl WUW~i V1C a1"OJW4V WU .".W L O C ~ y UV H .-1 -i O q N :9 P yq VL cA G 7U u u OY OYYGaO OC OY. 4 G C G% O. ~- V~ M A d w N Y n U a' N'y 4 I/1 y ti b V Ne NN AAV WN 7A0 a~ oyw~.io ~ N 'VOY ~. w o c q Y to •+ c u y Y m v> u c o a a m C Cq > U N'-1 'H -~ Y Y 9 C ? T 4 V 9 C W J¢ y ~-i w cwi u1 ya ~mvA x~~ i~eu h' 2 Y N F ~ O T ~ N W O F N a Y n u p U Gl T~ N N t~ W W ~ W p.G O O 4 4 N X W C O C O G p0 C H O W O W 0 O j 9nY 91iY 9UJ TI Oaa C G:: CYG GY .~. Y_ ~YU JnN Vro ^J AN pF gp eE k ~U .] ~ O N .i O N .Vi O O .Vi O a N M1' V4d V4y UUd V9pl ii ) IX+.r CWH KNH Kr161-61 0 N i ay 9 _ ~G I J Y 11 \• U O ~.1 W Y U C Y Y O d.y '~i V O N C 4'n ~i q G quN q V O V'J8 q U'O N ~ Y U N Y .i V P ~-1 • O E O q d CA~.+~•it 9 u4 N9 ONY V nN O q,C N4q V Lq V G O.ON V M T V V 9 N G V 4 d 0 T U V O. 6 a q G L'YH V C~N P O 9GV q OJ 9 O el d UA .~ p, U q C ~ P 1 4 ~n U N fy 1 q L b. 9 9 W a d N 4 fy 0 G Y ~ [L H F f. O g 4 d g U V N q p O. 0 d 0 q a W ]~ C Y 0 V/ 00 Ou~ A CC C~~'i E"i J 4-i4 OY „VA CI I U r1 A C 9 O.N J. a Y h Ii O q A U t1 C W N Y V~ d N V~ E a A I' N q (L ~i d J O.•i H 2 .+ w > g J N J .-. N >~ N q d' •1 -~ ] O. U .y ~ tl H P 4 9 H .J 'I V N J N v N a V 4 F. y q % C V N l1 V (L q JF Iq l]V ITy p I OdP M 1tl Wu V IC K u N J O C N 9 „ d fi O C N O li Y Y ti G OU .i q .i a q OG 9 .tea 4 ~U .1 .-1 .+O O'H N~ X00 W R `-q N N T.1 W~.1 v q nM1' d N 4 ~-U n d W N ri\I U sas r r i+: m z oe a m . YYG a z mu-~ w W q .49 3][ C A] O a R m 4 ] tl L HN OC8 F W tJ K q U F. V W ¢ 4 N N 2 P .i OHS O m0 d W v. S'.~ 6 K T a . .Li m _ C L a V a a-+OY/4yy y vu 14'N ..o/ U 4 0 q t'N M ] a] 6 Y N 9 P y Um 9 4 tt g m a 0 W a iM gNTN ct ,CU N] O LS3 'O .~ m -i O a W S m ma/MLWUF. v1 a SV > N C N / W O a/'J M-'G p4 9.QN9vGmOG ~ S V o9 VEOPH L1 K YOO N'OMC} n0 O W vlu N VI V Y.f( SL^S~p C 44 N d .n> ww wocwL]oo xa 52 OYgp94j} w9 N a -ai R Y w W U &U N N .Nt K ! W ' ~ W .I - O N 4 O I W O v O F ~ ~l '~ L F y v + 'J.W p L/C tf p ' C/C e. A .. .EC as N 4 h S ^ U N O b rl H N ~ m O u~a y ' N'.- i q' H N C O Y OM u q p ti~ q m m/L pVa tIL/ uuL ov a uema u.aN/ YN .-~ <a~ omw 6 C~ u N0 M'~N NU 4 9 H a .4 a ] 4 m C U> nAOO o40 ° N4a N m o ou u v a. YN m A W Y mmMM M ON N M > q GN/ Wq Y C w q v Y u t a e n v o~ o " " ' ' K l N. ~ N . A gN UO L44 ~ mN pq r ~ a uOV ~ w aq r)f~ wo t N i a q0 ' im 2 . ~ d WC V O 4 „ 9 W 4 N l1 V '.' W .Y M g R .. rl O. 4 N M a n u um ~ c a ao V1 / 4 4Y C qL / h0 .1 Y a U q0~ a v >, m 4NGNj OgEAH .". a coa'o a cNV ~GY~>. uPmyO a ma.+~ W GY Ca >tq OG CYM PN 'o caq'u wawts ~~~m~ H OU -OYFau O .] y X .] N ' lL ~../ 53~ RESOLUTION N0. ~/'~~~~ A RESOLU 7ION BY THE CITY CCU NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SAN BERNPRD INO C CllNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN CONFORMANCE NITH AB2948 (TANNER). WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2948 (Tanner Act, Chapter 1504, Statues of 1986) authorizes counties to adapt, as an elenent of the General Plan, a County Hazardous Waste Management Plan pursuant to guidelines adopted by the State Department of Health Services (herein after called State) and specifies procedures for the preparation, revision, adoption, approval, and amendment of the Plan; and WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors authorized, by resolution, the preparation of the Haza rdaus Waste Management Plan (herein after called Plan), and a Plan has been prepared with the assistance of the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan Adviwry Committee and Input from the cotes, local and regional agencies and the public; and WHEREAS, the Plan includes comprehensive goals and policies for the effective management of hazardous waste in the county, these goals include: 1. To protect the health and welfare of the public, environment, and econony of San 9ernardino County through a comprehensive program that ensures safe and responsible management of hazardous waste/material. 7 Tn rodurn !ha a m! of ha sa.vl nua u cio n na lnA in !ho rnu n!•. _.___ _ mn~ .. ..__. __. a__" •e,,a _~_ ... ..._ ___.,.~ by providing improved programs for hazardous waste source reduction and recycling. 3. To ensure proper management of hazardous waste/material by identifying and encouraging safe and efficient methods far managing hazardous waste/material and by providing for needed hazardous waste facilities in San Bernardino County. 4, To prevent hazardous waste from being permanently disposed into land, or emitted Into the air without being processed by an economically and technically feasible alternative technology. 5. To lmolve the public, industry, and government in a coaprehensive process that develops solutions for the man agamnt anA Aiepn <ai ee ha~a wirvi_ •~<!n. 6. To establish a framework for the development of San Bernardino County's share of hazardous waste facilities. 7, To recognize that consumers contribute to the generation of hazardous waste, and therefore, that limiting industrial growth would not be an appropriate means of reducing the County's commitment in hazardous waste managermnt. 537 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. HA2AI>D OUS HASTE PL PN May 17, 1989 Page 2 8. To encourage and develop public education programs on the proper management and disposal of hazardous waste. WHEREAS, the Plan was submitted to the fity for review and approval as mandated by the Tanner Act which requires, as one of the requirements for State approval of the Plan, that the County obtain approval from 50 percent of the cities with 50 percent of the incorporated population; and WHEREAS, the County must submit the Plan to the State for their approval by June 1, 1989; aM NHEREAS, the City will have an opportunity m adopt same form of the Plan at a later date cans is bent with the Tanner Pct which suDes that within 180 days after receiving notification from the Stale that the County Plan has been approved, the City must do one of the following: 1. Adopt a Cfty hazardous waste management plan containing all of the elements required by the Tanner Pct aM which is consistent with the approved County Plan. 2. Incorporate the applicable portions of the approved CaunLy Plan, by reference, into the City General Plan. 3. Enact an ordinance which requires that all applicable zoning, subdivision, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance decisions are Ma;e;nnr Warn rhn ,,..rr;.,.,<,.s rwu ~ ~~~on r,vinrv ot,~ a;~w identify general areas of siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and WHEREAS, the Plan when adopted by the County and Cities will serve as the primary planning document for the management of hazardous caste in the county and wilt provide for local involvement in the siting of hazardous waste facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California City Council hereby approves the County Plan, to conformity with A82948 (Tanner), 53~ CITY OF RANCHO CPCA~IONGA ~icn,ti~o STAFF REPORT ~.~~~ r* /, `, °_. Y' - ` '\, / _~ ` ~~~ I DATE: May 17, 1.989 y --i„__ To: Mayor, Members of. City Council and City Manager ~~ FROM: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager i BY: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator SUBJECT: Notice of Intention of The Citv cf i Rancho Cucamonga to Adoot a Resolution of Necessity to ' Condemn Certain Real Property Located in The City of Rancho Cucamonoa. Assessor Parcel No 0225-131-16. Marti Prooertv Recommendation: City council adopt a resolution declaring the public need and necessity to condemn real property identified as Assessor Parcel No 0225-131-16, Marti Property. The land to be used for development of a community park in the northeast portion of the City. (Exhibit "A") Backoround• The City's 1981 and subsequent general plans have designated a community park for the Etiwanda area. Consistent with the a .............~ ..: a.. .. _.._ _:. ~ . __ _. _ ~ _..__~ _ _ _ ~._ _ _... -.. _r ~ - _ ~ -..._.... ~~ ................ p...~ .......... .. ~ ~.....y~• .. r..e ..v secure the park site. Per Council direction, three parcels totaling 38.2 acres have been acquired. Negotiation towards purchase of the remaining parcel, Marti Property, needs to be completed. (Exhibit "B") An independent real estate appraisal was made on the Marti Property. The appraisal established a fair market value to be $635,000.00. The City made an offer based on tY,is sum as shown with Exhibit "C". A letter of rejection of the offer was received as shown with Exhibit "D". The owners representative stated they were not interested !.n selling at any price. To continue the process towards acquisition of the remaining parcel, City Council must adopt a resolution declaring the public need and necessity to condemn the property. The property owner has been notified of the preceding and has requested time to address the Council on the matter, see Exhibit "E". Js/oL/mg ~3~ RESOLUTION NO. V ~-- 1~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THvvE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOCIGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the development, design, construction and improvement of the proposed NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK Project. Based upon the study conducted, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan of development for the proposed park project will require the acquisition of. that certain real property, (APN: 0225-131-16) more particularly described as follows: The South 630 feet, measured along the west line of the Northwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 2a, Township 1 North, Range 6 {Pest, San Bernardino Meridan, in the County of San Berna rdino, State of California, according to the official plat thereof. Except therefrom that portion lying within the following described line: Beginn.i nq at the Northeast corner of said Northwest one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter; thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 16 seconds east, 1321.20 Feet, to the Southeast corner of said Northwest one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter; thence South 89 Degrees 10 Minutes 00 S=conds West, 290.OC feet, along the South line of said Northwest one-quarter of the Northeast e-y4ax tti, i.iirnce ivvriii 05 Degrees i5 Minutes uu aeconds East, 456.00 feet; thence North 04 Degrees 36 Minutes 00 Seconds West 413.00 feet; thence Clo rth 17 Degrees 04 Minutes 00 Seconds West, 2.4.00 feet, to n point in the North Line of said Northwest one- quarter of the Cla rthcast one-quarter; thence North 89 Degrees 09 iti notes 40 Seconds Cast, 310.66 feet, along said North line to the point of beginning. 1 5uo EXHIBIT A Note: The above described property is included within land shown as a portion of Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, Elock "A", Etiwanda Colony Lands, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per Map recorde3 in Hook 2, Page 24 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section '726'7.2, prior to ddoptinq this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owners of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuations; (iiij Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 36010 and 40404, a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary for the construction and improvement of public parY.s; (iv) On May 17, 1989, this Council held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said public hearing was concluded prier to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All Legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution. NOW TIIGRHPORE, the City C„uncil of the city of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: S F.CT]_oN 1_ Tn al. respects as set forth in the Recitals, Bart A, of this Resolution. S F. C'CI~H 2: That the real property which is required for the park project referenced herein is situated in the City of 2 svi Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as F.xhi6 it "A" and incorporated hereby by this reference. SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; ~. ... prope ty defined ,,., this Resoluti o.-. ~s necessary for the proposed project.; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to tiro owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7207.2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2, above, by proceedings in eminent domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directod to bring an act ior, in the Superior Court of the Slate of California for the County of san Barna rdinn; in tha Hama of the City of Rancho Cucamonga against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for development of a public park, and to do all things necessary 3 sy~ to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorised and instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order perr,~itting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSF,D AND ADOPTED this day Of May. I, DL'VERLY A. AL'TNELF,T, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of May, 1989, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the __ _____ day of May, 1969, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUCJCIL MEMBERS: A tl5LN 1': COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIh MEMBERS: ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City blerk City of Rancho Cucamonga C\134\MARTI\RESOLU 4 sy3 EEHIHZT ^H" e al Description That certain real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County cf San Bernardino, State of California and described as follows: The south 630.00 feet, measured along the west line of the northwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 26, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to the official plot thereof. Except therefrom that portion lying within the following described line: Beginning at the northeast aarrer of said northwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter; thence south o0 degrees 04 minutes 16 seconds east, 1321.20 feet, to the southeast corner „- -_-_ --t!~y.~rt one-.:,,r.ror of rho northeast one-warter; then south 89-degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds west, 290.00 feet, along the south line of said northwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter; thence north o5 degrees 24 minutes 00 seconds west, 233.00 feet; thence north 13 degrees 15 fiinutes 00 seconds east, 456.00 feet; thence north 04 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds west 413.00 feet; thence north li degrees 04 minutes OC seconds west, 244.00 feet, to a point in the north line of said northwest one- quarter cf the northeast one-quarter; thence north 89 degrees 09 minutes 40 seconds east, 7],0.66 feet, along said north line to the point of beginning. Note: The above-described property is included within land shown as a portion of lots 3, 4, 5, 6, Block "A", Etiwanda Colony lands, county of San Bernardino, State of California, as per riey neCJid2'v - -ok aqc 29 of Nap=_, -.. thu nffi,-a. of the County Recorder of said County. I,`,131\EXHBTA\R.C. 12.9 S S~S~ a V U~~$! ~~„ RS N 3 co 2 t~ 0 N N 4i 2 ~ i, ~O I A O s0 ~ QO O~ ,: - i I I I ~ Y pr ~ ~: d i. ~. 4 N O ~~~ Y ~ U O ~ ~ dg :~ ~~ I Oa ~_- _ L_J _ II__ I. I - ®- -~ I - ; i i r ~~ Q Plat Map ~ NORTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK W Z N U m ¢ ~ U ~ ~ ~ W {) LL n ~6 O~ 3N Wp y Q ~w O^ fC > ry 6 `<~liO) r O N ~ n p _. p i JJ u ¢ a l i y~~ l=i Y I 't ~.i v ~_~ h ~~ _ `~~ Q$ \.~ QS \\`\ ~ a5 v I~ 3 `' ~ i ~ ~ ~~ z ~ _~~. -~.~~~-.._,-.~~ - -- _ rn ri ~~ ~~ Ji m / I ~ ~ ~ Z e ~ Uy ~ Uy j „ : ~` <rL ~ rill ii"'i,i. II' llf <<_~) EXH181T B Jrr~ ~O • ~~~ `rte r -,~ 1-~ j---< CITY Of RANCHO CL'CAytOVGA U March 16, 1989 N,arti Enterprises, Inc. P.O. Box 966 rla.n,npnl l~allfnrni of o17II ..u Uifice Bo. W ~^ fNncno Cu.om rn3a. idl~tnmia +l':Il '.':1 ~ n . Re: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Northeast Community Park Gentlemen: The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to undertake a project for the development of a park and your property located north of Summit Avenue and east oP East Avenue is needed for this project. An independent real estate appraisal was recently made on your property. The appraiser reported that the Pair market value of your property is the amount of $635,000.00. Enclosed is an OPPer to Purchase Real Property Statement, an Appraisal Summary, and a Summary Statement Relating to the Purchase of Real Property or an Interest Therein. iu ~a.unr Lw i,nvn nii pr~pen lion unuuau Cor Lite project in a timely manner and to meet the project schedule, a settlement relative to the acquisition of your property by the City is desire3 at this time. If possible, we would 1_ike your response to this offer within two weeks of the date ~f this correspondence. If you have any questions, or desire any additional information, please feel free to contact Dave Leonard at (714) 989-1858. Thank you Pcr your anticipated courtesy and cooperation in regard to this matter. Si \ erenyl IIII l _ ~ \ h. I /II Jack Lam, City Manager cc: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager Russell Maguire, City Engineer Dave Leonard, Park Proj act Coordinator F. Elliot Goldman, Deputy City Attorney ,/ ~~~,. ~Y RilLam i \le. ender t hn dv\ ~ Ouyuei II ~ v.....; ~. Ilen ni. i tihntl leb~~rah C Nmwn Pa mele I AA'nght lad Lam, :11('0 EXHIBIT C n u PHILIP F. LAN ZA FAME 4'tORNEY 9T l.gyy wm _cs. vNioN srPec~. suns zca PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91106 lelel ao•-o++a Merch 30, 1989 Jack Lam Clty of Aancho Cucamonga P.G. Rox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Clty of Rancho Cucamonga ve. Marti (Northeast Community Pazk) DeaY Mi. Lamx Pleaee be advised that T have been retained by Mr. Kurt Marti and Marti Enterprieee~ Inc., with reference to hie ownership of the orcperty in Rancho Cucamonga and your letter of March 16, 1989 offering to purchaee that property fora prcposed deveiopmnnt. Mr. Hayti dose not wish to sell hie property for any price. Accord Sngly~ your oxrer cu puiu~evo .a c]cctcd. Should you have any further communLcat Lone for Hr. Hayti with reference to this matter, please direct them to the undersigned. Very truly yours, \\J~ ~(Il',°~~L~~' ~ ~: ~~-1(~„jhQn Philip '•'. Lanzaf I~/(/ PFL: ce cc: Kurt Marti t, ~- ~:: Fl~IZ `' J9C7 Clil ip F; ~~ , iz~Cg!vE9 nNNCHO CnCAMCNna REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AM nor, 31909 ox q (B(9(ID(ll(12(1(2(3(4(5~6 4 5~'~' EXM181T D PHll.lf F. LA\ZAFAME May d, 1189 Beverly A. .lu thelet, City Clerk 9320 ^ase Line Road, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rarc ho Cucamonga, cA 91730 Ae: Rancho Cu camon 4 t' APN 0225-131-15 Dear Ns. Authelet: Further to the notice sent by your office of intent to adopt a Aesolu r,ion of Necessity [o condemn certain real property, above identified, please be advieetl that the property owns re antl their representative will appear at the hearing on May 17, 1989 and wish tc Se heard. ~e~tzu ly ~~s, /'//////'(7777771 1 E'`Wl aE e PFL: re \\\~_lll~~ _///111 'I o f~: rani ww n Gai GO ~ C Y MAY o 81989 CITM OF RANCNO CUCAMppNOA COMMUNITY BERVICEI EXHIBIT E ~~~ -- -- --- CITY OF RANCHO CCCA~IONCA ~>, STAFF REPORT ,~y,, ~~' GATE: May I7, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager ', FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8V: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Order to Construct Public Improvements at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 and 10049 Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Improvements along Arrow Route frontage of property) RECOMENDATION: '~, It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with the installation of improvements at APN 209-041-18, 09, 22 and 31, if such improvements have not been installed 60 days after May 17, 1989, in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Pct of X911 and order the formation of an assessment district described as: APN 209-041-19, 09, 22 and 31 ~~ That land situated in the Ste ce cf California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: That portion of the North 7 acres of Lot 21, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to , Map cf Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, it Page 9, records of said County described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 21, thence Easterly along the Northerly line of said lot, 55 feet, thence Southerly and parallel to the Westerly line of said lot, 170 feet; thence Ne sterly and parallel to the Northerly line of said lot, 55 feet; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said lot, 170 feet to the point of beginning. And that land described as; ' That portion of Lot 21, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, ICI San Bernardino Base and Merid7an, according to Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, described as follows: ssd CCSR May 17, 1989 Page 2 Beginning at point 332.21 feet West of the intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, thence South and parallel to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue 200 feet; thence East antl parallel to the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 84.61 feet; thence North and paraiiei to the Westerly line u. iurner Avenue 200 fzzt; th<ncz West and parallel to the Southerly tine of Arrow Route to *.he point of beginning. That portion of Lot 21, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Arrow Route and the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, thence Nest along the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South and parallel to the Westerly ifne of Turner Avenue, 200 feet, thence West and parallel to the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 30 feet to a paint which is 247,6 feet from the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, thence North 200 feet to the Southerly line of Arrow Route; thence East along the Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning, That portion of Lot 21, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, aan Uernaraino uase ana men aian, accuruiny w riap ui i.o~anionya Fruit lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, describe as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of Lhe Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, then West along the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217,6 feet; thence South and parallel to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet, thence East and parallel Lo the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet; thence North along the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet to the point of beginning. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On riay "c, i969, the aito~iied °WutiGe Gf "r ubiiC riedi iiig aid D'r der `- Construct" was posted in front of the property located at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10015 anA 10049 Arrow Route, identified by APN 209-041-18, 09, 22 and 31. This Notice was posted in accordance with Chapter 27 of [mpre vement Act of 1911 and orders Che installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, ha se pavements, street pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other incidentals therewith. The property owners are instructed, that they are given sixty Ssl ccsa May 17, 1989 Page 3 (60) days, from the day of Resolution adoption (May 17, 1989) to construct said improvements. After 60 days is up, the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent. of Streets, will cause the improvements to be constructed and the property owner will be assessed for all the costs. The costs will he paid by the formation of an assessment for all the costs. Tire costs wiii be paid by the formation of an assessment district which will include Apn 209-041-18, 09, 22 and 31 and described in the recammendati on above. Upon hearing protests or objections, if any, at the public hearing, Council is requested to make a ruling and directive to staff regardi n9 protests and direct the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with said improvements, if such have not been constructed within sixty (60) days, and Lo further order the formation of an assessment district which will include the before mentioned parcels to pay for said improvements. aespec t~tµl ly wbmitted, ./ j- /. ~ - . i. ~ ~- RMM:Mp:pani~ Attachments 55 ~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ Q -~3 A RESOL UIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA gtOE RING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 AND 10049 ARROW ROUTE, APN 209-041-09, 18, 22 ANO 31 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HI CHiWAVS SECTION 5870 THRU 5880 MORE COMAONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 21 OF IMPROVEME N? ACT OF 1911 WHEREAS, on May 2, 1989, the City Engineer acting under the authority of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga had posted at the subject location of formal neti ce to construct Public Improvements. WHEREAS, on this Gate May 17, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has met to hear all protests or objections from any interested parties to the Order to Construct; and upon hearing ail objections, resolves in the common interest of public health, safety and welfare for the City of Rancho Cucamonga that public improvement be made at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 and 10049 Arrow Route and hereby resolves and otherwise issues an "Order to Construct" street frontage improvements consisting of parking lane pavements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parkway gradings, drive approaches and street lights and all incidentals thereto in conformance to the "Standard Drawings" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1988 Edition with supplements through 1989, with all plans and construction work being subject to review and permit 6y the Engi neeri rig Civi si cn of t;a Ccmmuni ty Development Depar t7te.^.t of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. en w~ro- matt rnmmcnrc within si xte f601 da vs of the execution of this resolution and if not conmenced or provision made therefore to the satisfaction of this City Council, the City Engineer, ac tf ng as Superintendent of Streets, shall cause such construction to be made, and in pursuance to the s *.a totes of the Cal lfornia Codes for Street and Highways shall proceed wi th actions to assess the costs therefore as tax lien upon that real property described as: P.PN 209-041-09, 18, 22 and 31 That land situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: That portion of the North 7 acres of Lot 21, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 'Rest, San Bernardino Base and Meri dtan, according to Map of Cucamonga -d• - , ao ,.. riled „~ Bock of Wps, °a gc °. .._„rds of .aid County, udescri~bedV as ~follows~: Beginning at Lhe Northwest corner of said Lot 21, thence Easterly along the Northerly line of said tot, 55 feet; thence Southerly and parallel to the 'Aesterly line of said lot, 110 feet; thence Westerly and parallel to the Northerly line of said lot, 55 feet; thence Northerly along the Westerly 11ne of said lot, 170 feet to the pot nt of beginning. S53 RESOLUTION N0. CONSTRUCTION. OF PUBLiC IMPROH. PAGE 2 That portion of Lot 21, Section 11, Towns hlp 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardi no Base and Meridian, according to Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at a point 332.21 feet West of the intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, thence South and parallel to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue 2000 feet; thence East and parallel to the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 84.61 feet; thence North and parallel to the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet; thence West and parallel to the Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning. That portion of Lot 21, Section 1, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the Southerly sine of Arrow Route and the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, thence Nest along the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South and parallel to the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet, thence West and parali ei to the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 30 feet to a point which is 247.6 feet from the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, thence Ncrth 200 feet to the Southerly line of Arrow Route; thence East along the Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning. That portion of Lot 21, Section 11, Towns hTp 1 South, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, thence West along the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet; thence South and parallel to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet, thence East and para11 e1 to the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet; thence North along the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet to the point of Beginning. 55~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ANO OROER TC CONSTRUCT Pursuant to Section 5875 of the California Code for Streets and Highways entitled "Duty to Construct": "The owners of lots or portions of lots fronting on any public street or place when that street or place has been improved by the cr nstruc tion of sidewalks or curbs for a total frontage of more than fifty percent (50`5) on one side of such street or place in any block, or where a petition signed by the owners of more than sixty percent (608) of the front footage of any part of an unimproved portion or portions of a block has been filed with the City Clerk requesting the installation of such improvements in front of said part, or whenever the legislative body of the City upon its own motion; orders the installation of such improvements in front of said part, shall have the duty of constructing or causing construction of sidewalks or curbs in front of their properties upon notice so to do by the superintendent of streets". On May 17, 1389, the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the legislative body for the City, will meet to adopt a Resolution ordering the construction of curbs, gutters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, street pavements, base pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other incidentals involved therewT th. Nati ce to Construct Pursuant to Sec ti an 5876 of the California Codes fer Streets ar.d Highways, the City Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga under the direction of the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby notifies all oarti es hol di na legal Dosses Sion of that oro oerty located at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 and 10049 Arrow Route, more specifically Identified as Assessor's 7arcel No. 209-041-18, 09, 22 and 31 being described as follows: That land situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino, and is described as follows: That portion of the North 7 acres of Lot 21, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according Lo Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as par map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said Co cnQ:, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 21, ther~ce Easterly along the Northerly line of said lot, 55 feet; thence Southerly and parallel to the Westerly line of said lot, 170 feet; thence Westerly and parallel to the H ortherly li,^.e ^f °'id lct 55 f^:•, f!~nce Harthe^ly along •ha Westerly 1i.^.e of said lot, 110 feet to the point of beginning. That portion of lot 21, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San bernardino Base and Meridiar„ according to Map of Cucamonga fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at a point 332.21 feet 'lest of the intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly 6o and ary line of Turner Avenue, ~~~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDER TO CONSTRUCT PACE 2 thence South and para11 e1 to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue 2000 feet; thence East and parallel to the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 94.61 feet; thence North and parallel to the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet; thence West and para11 e1 to the Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning. That portion of Lot 21, Section 1, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Arrow RDUte and the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, thence Nest along the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South and parallel to the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet, thence Nest and parallel to the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 30 feet to a point which is 247.6 feet from the Westerly line of Turner Avenue, thence North 200 feet to the Southerly line of Arrow Route; thence East along the Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning. That portion of Lot 21, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to Map of Cucamonga Fruit Lands, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, records of said County, described as fnl lows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, thence West along the Southerly bo unoary Itne of Arrow RDnte, Z1/.D reet; tnence Soutn ana parallel to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet, thence East and parallel to the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet; thence North along the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet to the point of Beginning. To construct or to cause to construct curbs, gutters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, street pavements, base pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other incidentals therewith. Such workings shall co nfo rnl to "Standard Drawings" for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1988 Edition with supplements through 1969. all plans and construction workings sub,~ect to review and permit by the Engineering Division of the Community Development Department for the fi ty of Rancho Cucamonga. Aii such workings shaii commence inure di ately upon enac invent of 'Order to Construct" and, if not commenced within 60 days thereafter, the City Engineer acting as the superintendent of streets shall cause such construction to be done and the cost thereof shall be alien upon the property. 5~" NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDER TO CONSTRUCT PACE 3 Notice of Public Nearing Pursuant to Section 5818.1 of the California Codes for Streets and Highways, you are hereby notified of a public hearing to be held at the Lions Park Community Center, by the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to hear and pass upon protests or objections to this Notice to Construct. Such meeting will begin at the hour of 7:30 p. m. on the 17th day of May, 1989. The Lions Park Comm ni ty Center is located at 9i.6i lase Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The decisions of the City Council on all protes is and objections shall be final and conclusive. Anyone having any questions or concerns on this issue is encouraged tc contact the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Division, Design Section, at 989-1962 or visit the office at 9330 9ase Line road, Suite 203, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Anyone wishing to comment on this issue is encouraged to attend the public hearing. "t.,' ~; ' --- ~/_ ~ ice- - _ _.- --..., usse agu re ~. neer S/ - ----- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAAIONGA ~~: STAFF REPORT :~~~ DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FRDM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire public right-of-way for• the Arrow Route Widening Project between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue at the property located at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 and 10049 Arrow Route (APN 209-041-IR, 09, 22 and 31) for the construction of street improvements across the Arrow Route frontage of said property i RECDMMENDATION: it Staff reconmends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - I directing staff to proceed with condemnation of right-of-way for the construction of street improvements on Arrow Route properties located at 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 and 10049 Arrow Route (APN 209-041-18, 09,22 and 31) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RACK6ROUND/ANALYSIS: This Eminent Domain action to acquire public right-of-way for the Arrow Route Widening Street Improvement Project. The projects limits are from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue. ~ The property owners of the parcel in question, APN 209-041-18, 09, 22 and 'I 31 have been offered the exchange of right-of-way for improvements. As of this date, negotiations *a acquire such right-of-way continue without i erpc uti on of a r; gh t_of-way exchange or purchase agreement. Although negotiations continue, it is felt necessary at this time to enact a Resolution of Necessity Lo proceed with condemnation of such ~ right-of-way for the proposed Arrow Route Nidening Street Improvements. This 15 done to avoid further delays in constructing the improvements currently on hold due to lack of right-of-way, i pncpnr iful l~~hm{~fod~ RHM:MO:pam 1' Attachment 55~ RESOLUTION N0. Q [ - ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN CI! OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, A. Recitals. jij The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the design, construction and street widening project for Arrow Route. Based upon the study conducted, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible alignment for the proposed street widening will require the acquisition of a right-of-way across a portion of a "General Commercial" zoned parcel, mere particularly described herein; (iii Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7261.2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owners of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent appraisal valuations; (iii) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 40404, a City may acgdi re private property by condemnation when it is necessary far extending and widening streets, as weil as for the construction of drains, sewers and acqueducts; (iv) On May 17, 1989, this Council held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said public hearing was concluded prior to the ado piton of this Resolution; and, Iv) all legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution. NOM THEREFORE, 1t is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTipI 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reso u Ton. SECTION 2: That portion of the property which is required for a ri ah t-of-wav o--~'r stet wi Aenina nu rnnars is ai tua tnA in tM City of Rancho L ucamonga, County of San 6ernardi no, State of tai ifor ni a, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTIpI 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dur n-i g-tTie~a ove-referenced public hearing, including written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: 559 RESOLUTION N0. PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF REAL PROPERTY MAY 17, 1989 PAGE 2 a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; S. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatzst public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Res of uti an if necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has Seen made to the owners of said real property pu rs ua n*. to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the proper y described in Section 2, above, by proceedings in eminent domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning and acquiring a right-of-way for street purposed, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make apollcati ons to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property far the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and AUOP TED this day of ayor .~J[!~ lne 4D nn r a o[ toe xl, In set uon n. Ip-n.nlr I soDtn, Pa¢e r v<a, s.n xrn. tarn Dre.ee .eJ I4 rIe1.D, to t < L,,~elr of ~.n e. rn.rDl ne, x a of C•I llornl •, Gc<D re lrt• to the up of t e cot .. o••R. rr.nt Le ref •, r oraeJlln Ra ok a DI n•pe Pye f, In ane nlltueol [v• [uv ntr Pc roraer Dt eera to mtY. Ex<GPi Ina put IYl ly eeutn of • Il ne a n lenllrl alst•nt eo rt nerlr Iroe the xDtn.ay unr of .u+•UI +1. •Vu i<t.m aln .ere to lebr.« rnreG auee el [<m. AL50 EACEP}IYC [he nlro. pe 6lnnl RS •t t w I'I r[(rn of [ne SDUtFrrll DDU nEery Iln e[ + Peu le + .IreL O•inC eiv Il ne DI lur Avl nu<; [hence V•et elO ry: IIl Ir•i'i ~I,ly Il ne e v Pu u[e, I u~e rleet; tnee« sou in .m v•nnat Ihr ~ 11.1 en ay n~ ~ol rDr e ore 1ua Cut. tnenw L.r me D+1 •I LI to 1 i. ... ,oly Dvmmery It ue oer Af lovl ROVtf, 311.A le tI In<n ! Ho rtn •lanq a t111Y bDUneerY It ee of Nrrcr Rrln ., I00 feet tv tn< pDl e[ of be 6lnnl iy.• AL50 CNC [Pi I1G tnereC[ov beRlnN la • G Mln[ )J).II (ee[ Meet vl Ine ~ late nec[IDn D( tn< Svut net ^Y bounJ•tY 1 nr DI An nv Pe err • r vnteli} boo nd•rY Iln D[ Soto to en Souln • 1 Nlrl lel a 4ee[e liy bound uY Ilv o[ iur vet Av enu<~x00 lee[, Urn oe [u[ eee pvdi<1 PD me eov therly bo uvd<ry Iln• vl NrDV Pm u, Nt. nl leer; nle v<e Po nn .M r•nllel [O [M1e V<e le rlx Il ee DI }v r oer Avenue. EU II Irrt, then[! got eva pu all e! tD the SDUtnecl) 11 v< e( ksov Pout• to the pDl of al be81nN og. AL50 CFCEPi INC the tetra. c ncl Dq e[ t0[ fel nt vl Icn l•e ct loo Dt [ne SDU tnerly Ilv of Arr v but eN the 4es l.etly Iln vt im t Ave nee: theno /VUt •l n ly [n< SouUm rlY Igoe of Arr vv Fn vte~ IILC leer toot ne true Dol nt D/ beq!In 114: rhea c< Scuth •b pu Rl iel to t e1JY Ilrc DI Arvet Ave vve. ]00 (<e[: [M1en cG Vut •nJ pu ellel [ Ihe1,e nrll Il nt el .4 nV Mvt e, lD IG to . ro[K an l<n I< xu.b feet Iroa [I,! ~ Ilr Ilne DI Trt r Are nv<: tn<nGe Klttn Sao ee et to ene s,,,tnltlr a n< of urp~ Peat 1, tntnreeE.et aoDd [M bvtnerle 11 De v[ M[ou Pvute ro the palm DI Du P.i vnl rg. ~T _q 4RROw Rt7UtE'~ •' ~ ie ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~. ~ -- w~, I I . . I ' v 1 L~ ~ ~') 1~ ~ ~ ' t~ ID' w A 7 0' ~ ~ ~ ~ e e .c +R.'[ E AHIBIi "N~~ EXHIBIT ONE Estate of Ben M. Santoluci to Grace Santolucito 10005 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Anderson, laves and Reever 165 .Jest Foothill Boulevard, Suite 1 Upland, Ca 91786 Markman, Arc zy nski, Hanson & Goldman Number One Civic Center Circle Post Office Box 1059 8 rea, Ca 92622-1059 S~~ NOTICE OF INTE NT iON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO CONDEM! A RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREET IMPROVEMENT OF AARON ROUTE ACROSS A PORTION OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 209-041-18, 09, 22 AND 31 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that, pursuant to California code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235, the City of Rancho Cucamonga intends to ce nsi der for adoption a resoi ution of necessity to condemn a ri yh t-of-way for street improvement project on a portion of property, which portion is located on property commonly known by the street addresses 10005, 10095, 10081, 10075 and 10049 Arrow Route, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Assessors Parcel Nos. 209-041-18, 09, 22 and 31), and which portion is further described by the legal description and the map de pictlon attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The hearing by the City Council of the CT ty of Rancho Cucamonga to consider the adoption of said resolution will be conducted on May 17, 1989, at 7:30 p. m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chambers, Lions Park Community Building, Lions Park, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235, if you desire to appear at the above-referenced time and place for said publtc hearing, you may be heard on Lhe matters as follows: i. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project; '2. Whether Lhe pr00 ect 15 pl apnea or locates 1^ the manner LndL will oe most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and, 3. Nhether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. To appear and be heard on any of the above-referenced items, you must file a written request to appear prior to the date set for the public hearing by filing-or 3elivertng a written request to: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk 9320 Base Line Road, Sutte C D,O. Box 807 Rancho Cuc amonaa. CA 91730 S~ Page 2 Failure to file a written request to appear and he heard as outlined above can result, by law, in a waiver of your right to appear and be heard at the public hearing. For further information, contact: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C "r."u, box 6Di Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 989-1862 Dated; every u .e e i y er 5~~f - ----- CITY OF RANCHO CtiC2.MONGA STAFF REPORT ~ ^~ , DATE: May 17, 1989 'l T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Mayui re, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Order to Construct Public Improvements at 10025 Arrow Route, a vacant lot, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Improvements along Arrow Route frontage of property). 0.ECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the '~ City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with the ~, instal latton of Improvements at APN's 209-041-32, 33 and 34, if such '~, improvements have not been installed 60 days after May 17, 1989, in accordance '~ with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and order the formation of an I assessment district described as: APN's 209-041-32, 33 and 34 That land situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and j described as follows: The North 7 acres of Lot 21, in Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to the map of the ~i Cucamonga Fruit Lands, recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, in the ~. office cf the county recorder of said Ca!nry, heing all of said Lot 21. EXCEPT that part lying South of a line drawn parallel with and distant Northerly from the Southerly line of said Lot 21, a sufficient distance to embrace three acres cf land. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom beginning at the point of intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue; thence West along the Southerly boundary line ^f A- R^^t^ 217 6 f^^t; thane South and oarall-1 the Westerl boundary line~of Turner~Avenue, 200 feet, thence East and parallel to the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet; thence North along the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet to the point of beginning. S~oS CCSR MAY 17, 1989 PAGE 2 ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom beginning at a point 332.21 feet West of the intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and Che 'Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue; thence South and parallel to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue 200 feet, thence East and parallel to the Soothe rty boundary line of Arrow Route, A4.61 feet; thence North and paraiiei to the westerly line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet; thence West and parallel to Lhe Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom commencing at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Arrow Route and the Westerly line of Turner Avenue; thence West along the Southerly tine of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South and parallel to the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 30 feet Yo a point which is 247.6 feet from the Westerly line of Turner Avenue; thence North 200 feet to the Southerly line of Rrrow Route, thence East along the Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning. BACKGROUND/AIULYSIS: On May 2, 1989, the attached "Notice of Public Hearing and Order to Construct" was posted in frd.^.t of the ^roperry located at 10025 Arrow Route, a vacant lot, identified by APN's 209-041-32, 33 and 34, This Notice was posted in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and orders the installation of curbs, qu tters,si dewalks, drive approaches, street lights, base Davements, street pavements, grading, clearing one gruaoing and ail otner incidentals therewith. The property owners are instructed, that they are ^yiven sixty (60) days, from the day of Resolution adoption (May 17, 1989) to construct said improvements. After 6U days is up, the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets, will cause the improvements to be cans trot tea and the property owner will be assessed for all Lhe costs. The costs will be paid by the formation of an assessment district which will include APN's 209-041-32, 33 and 34 and are described in the recommendation above. 'J pon hearing protests or objections, 1f any, at the public hearing, Council is requested to make a ruling and directive to staff regarding protests and direct the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets, to proceed wito said improvements, if such have not been constructeal within sixty (60) .i~~~ a^A to fi,rtha_r nrdar tha formation of an assessment district which will include the before mentioned parcels to pay for said improvements. Respectfully submitted, .~ i; „ , RNM: MO:JLM: pam Attachment 5~' RESOLUTION N0. 8 ! '~,3 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF pURLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 10025 ARROW ROUTE, A VACANT LOT, APN'S 209-041,32, 33 ANO 34, LN ACCORDANCE KITH THE CALIFORNSA CODES fOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 THRU 5880 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN .45 CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 wHLREAS, On May 2, i9ev, the City Engineer dCting under the authority of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga had posted at Lhe subject location a Formal Notice to Ccnstruct Pu'olic Improvements. 'WHEREAS, on this date May 17, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has met to hear all protests or objections from any interested parties to the Order to Construct; and upon hearing all objections, resolves in the common interest of public health, safety and welfare for the City of Rancho Cucamonga that public improvement be made at 10025 Arrow Route, a vacant lot, and hereby resolves and otherwise issues an "Order to Construct" street frontage improvements consisting of parking lane pavements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parkway gra di ngs, drive approaches and street lights and all incidentals thereto in conformance to the "Standard Drawings" of the City of Rancho Cuc zmnnga, 1a88 Edition with supplements through 1989, with all plans and construction work being subject to review and permit 5y the Engineering Divsii on of the Community Development Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All work shall commence within sixty (60) days of the execution of this resolution and if not commenced or provision made therefore to the satisfaction of this City Council, the City Engineer, acting as Superintendent of Streets, shall cause such construction to he made, and in pursuance to the statutes of the California Codes for Street and Highways shall proceed with actions to assess the costs therefore as tax lien upon Lhat real property described as: That land situated in the State of California, County of San 3ernardino and described a5 follows: The North 7 acres of Lot 21, in Section 11, Township 1 South, RdnOP 7 WPkL. .San RPrnd rdi no Ra SP and Meridian. in the County or San De rnardi no, State of Cai ifornia, according co the map of the Cucamonga fruit Lands, recorded in Book 4 of Maps, cage 9, in the office of the County recorder of said County, being all of said Lot 21. ~~ RESOLUTION Page 2 EXCEPT that part lying South of a line drawn parallel with and distant Northerly from the Southerly line of said Lot 21, a sufficient distance to embrace three acres of land. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom beginning at the point of intersection of the Southerly boundary tine of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of turner Avenue; thence West along the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet; thence South and parallel to the Westerly boundary tine of Turner kvenue, 200 feet, thence East and parallel Lo the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet; thence North along the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom beginning at a point 332.21 feet West of the intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue; thence South and parallel to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue 200 feet, thence East and parallel to the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, A4.61 feet; thence North and parallel to the westerly line of Turner Avonue, 200 feet; thence West and parallel to the Southerly line of Arrow Rou±e to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom commencing at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Arrow Route and the Nes terty line of Turner Avenue; thence West along the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 211.6 feet to the true point of begf nning; thence South and parallel to the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 30 feet to a point which is 247.6 feet from the Westerly line of Turner Avenue; thence North 200 feet to the Southerly tine of Arrow Route, thence East along the Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning. ~~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ANO OROER TO CONSTRUCT Pursuant to Sections 5875 of the California Code far Streets and Highways enti tl2d "Duty to Construct": "The owners of lots or portions of lots fronting on any public street or place when that street or place has been improved by the construction of sidewalks or curbs for a total frontage of more than fifty percent (50%) on one side of such street or place in any block, or where a petition signed by tie Jw ^efe Jf i~Or'e thdo Si%ty pefCent (SDni of the r`r Ofit fvJtdg2 Jf dny pdrt of an unimproved portion or portions of a block has been filed with the City Clerk requesting the installation of such improvements in front of said part, or whenever the legislative body of the City upon its own motion; orders the installation of such improvements in front of said part, shall have the duty of constructing or causing construction of sidewalks or curbs in front of their properties upon notice so to do by the Superintendent of Streets". On May 17, 1989, the City council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the legislative body for the City, will meet to adopt a Resolutfon ordering the construction of curbs, gutters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, street pavements, base pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other Incidentals involved therewith. Notice to Construct Pursuant to Section 5816 of the California Codes for Streets an4 Highways, the City Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga under the direction of the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby notifies all parties holding legal possession of that property located at 10025 Arrow r<ouce, a vacant lot, more specif icaiiy iaerciried as nssessor~s rarcei nos. 209-041-32, 33 and 34 being described as follows: That land situated in Lhe State of California, County of San Bernardino, and is described as follows: The North 7 acres of Lot 21, in Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the County of San Bernardino, State of Cal7fornia, according to the map of the Cucamonga Fruit Lands, recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, in the office of the County recorder of said Cnunty, being all of said Lot 21. EXCEPT that part lying South of aline drawn parallel with and distant Northerly from the Southerly line of said lot 21, a suffi~ieni disidnce io embrace Ehree acres of land. ~~~ ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom beginning at the point of intersection of the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route and the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue; thence 'West along the SoutfRrly boundary line of Arrow Route, 211.6 feet; thence South and parallel to the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet, tnence East and parallel to the Southerly boundary line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet; thence North along the Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom 6e gi nning at a point 332.21 feet West of the Litersec ti un ofi the Southeriy boundary line of Arrow Route and Lhe Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue; thence Snuth and para'.1 e1 to the 'Westerly boundary line of Turner Avenue 200 feet, thence East and parallel to the Southeriy boundary line of Arrow Route, 84.61 feet; thence North and parallel to the westerly line of Turner Avenue, 200 feet; thence West and parallel to the Southerly line of grrow Route to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom commencing at the point of intersection of the Scutherly line of Arrow Route and the Westerly line of Turner Avenue; thence West along the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 217.6 feet to the true point of be gT nning; thence South and pa raltel to the Southerly line of Arrow Route, 30 feet to a point which is 247.6 feet from Lhe Westerly line of Turner Avenue; thence North 200 feet to the Southerly line of Arrow Route, thence East along the Southerly line of Arrow Route to the point of beginning. To construct or to cause to construct curbs, gutters, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, street pavements, base pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all otirer incidentals therewith. Such improvements shall conform to "Standard Drawings" for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1387 Edition with supplements through 1969, All plans and improvements subject to review and permit by Lhe Engineering Division of Lhe Community Development Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All such improvements shalt commence imne diately upon enactment of "Order to Construct" and, if not commenced within 60 days thereafter, the City Engineer acting as the Superintendent of Streets shall cause such construction to be done and the cost thereof shall be alien upon the property. Notice of Public Hearin Pursuant to Section 5979.1 of the California Codes for Streets and Highways, you are hereby notified of a nu blir rw wring ro be held ~t the Lions Park Curimni ly Center, by the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to hear and pass upon protests or objections to this Notice to Construct. Such meeting will begin at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on the 17th day of May, 1989. The !.ions Park Community Center is located at 91x1 Base Line Road, ?anc ho Cucamonga, California. The decisions of the City council on all protests and objections shall be final and cond usive. 5 ~a Anyone having any questions or concerns on this issue is encouraged to contact the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Engineering Division, Design Section, at 989-1962 or visit the office at 9330 Base Line Road, Suite 203, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Rnyone wishing to comment on this issue is encouraged to attend the public hearing. ~,.'/ ~,~ usse agu re, y ng neer " ~~/ NOTICE OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STREET IMPROVEMENT OF ARROW ROUTE ACROSS A PORTION OF PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 209-041-32, 33 AND 34 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235, the City of Rancho Cucamonga intends to consider for adoption a Resolution of Necessity to Condemn a right-of-way for street improvement project on a portion of property, which portion is located on property commonly known by the street address of 10025 Arrow Route (a vacant lot), City of Rancho Cucamonga (Assessors Parcel Nos. 209-041-32, 33 and 34 ), and which portion is further d2sc ribed by the legal description and trye map depiction attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The hearing by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to consider the adoption of said Resolution will be conducted on May 17, 1989 at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council Chambers, Liens Park Community Building, Lions Park, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235, if you desire to appear at the above-referenced time and place for said public hearing, you may be heard on the matters as follows: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the project; 2. Whe*.her fhe Dreject is planned or loco*.ed i.^. fhe manner chat will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and, 3. Whether the property sought Lo be acquired is necessary for the project. ie appear and be heard on any of the above-referenced items, you must file a written request to appear prior to the date set for the public hearing oy filing ~r del ive ring a written request to: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamcnga, California 91730 Failure to file a written request to appear and be heard as outlined above can result, by law, in a waiver of your right *.o appear and be heard at tho nu hl i~ haarinn For further information, contact: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 4320 Base Line Rnad, Suite C P .O. dox 801 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (7141 989-1862 Date: ~ / -~v€r''f- u e - CITY OF RA?vCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FR"uM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer :~~, 1 SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire public right-nf-way for the Arrow route widening Project between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue at the property located at 10025 Arrow Route, a vacant lot, (APN's 209-041-32, 33 and 34) for the construction of street improvements across the Arrow Route frontage of said property. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to Proceed with condemnation of right-of-way for the construction of street improvements on Arrow Route properties located at 10025 Arrow Route, a vacant lot, (APN's 209-C41-32, 33 and 34) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACK6ROUN0/ANALYSIS: This is an Eminent Domain ac Lion to acquire public right-of-way for the Arrow Route Widening Street lmprovemerit project. The projec is limits are from Nrcm oaia Nvenue to Hcrmo sa revenue. The property owners of the parcel in-qustion, APN's 209-041-32, 33 and 34 have been offered the exchange of right-of-way for improvements. As of this date, negotiations to acquire such right-of-way continue without execution of a right-of-way exchange or purchase agreement. Although negotiations continue, it is felt necessary at this time to enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such right-of-way for the proposed Arrow Route Nidening Street Improvements. This is done to avoid further delays 1n constructing the improvements currently on hold due to lack of right-of-way. Re spec~€n , y si mi tted, / ~~~~ ! ~~~~. , RHM:MO:JLM:pam Attachment 5 73 RE SOL UTICN N0. ~ ! c/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN 7HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the design, construction and street widening project for Arrow Route. Based upon the study conducted, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible alignment for the proposed street widening will require the acquisition of a right-of-way across a portion of a general comnerci al zoned parcel, more particularly described herein; (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Sec tin 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owners of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by independent apprai sal valuations; (iii) Pursuant to California code of Civil Procedures, Section 1240.010(b ), a City may acquire private property in condemnation when said property is a remnant as described in Section 1240.010(a) of said Code. (iv) Pursuant to California Govermment Code Section 40404, a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary foe extending and widening streets, as well as for the construction of drains, sewers and acque ducts; (v) On May 11, 1989, this Council held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said public hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (vi) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. 8. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council pf Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: sECTiuN is In ail respects as set fortn in the Recitals, Part A, of finis R esolu :off. SECTION 2: That portion of the property which is required fora right- of-wayy o~reet widening purposes is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. 5~~ Resolution May 17, 1989 Page 2 SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during~ve-referenced public hearing, incuding written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows; a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution is necessary for the proposed project; and, d, An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Govenrment code Section 7267.2. SECTIpI 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the proper~ed scribed in Section 2, above, by proceedings in Eminent Domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of Caiifornia for the County of San Bernardino, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning and acquiring a right-of-way for street purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determinate on in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make applications to said Court fcr an Order 1'i xi ng the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this R es alu ion n. - PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 5~5 'ShG po rt loo of the No r[h / ecr<s of Iv[ 31, Sea too II, To4nr Tlp I Sau[h, tioea ] Mest, San 14rnrtdlso boa rod tI rIJIAn, ores qg ro Ilap of Cuu.on8a Fruit IAN+, •+~par wsV rmevrJed In Wu[ - u: Nay+c PaBr 9, records of ul0 W uo[Y. ducrlb<J a [slim VS: B<B1 mnlB a[ the Porr hunt c r of aIJ lo[ tl, thence Eas [er1Y done the 1br[AerlY Ilve of sold lat. )Snrtel, thence ;nuUV rIY and parellel'to [he Nea[er1Y ll~ne of u(d lot, I]O [ex[; [h[n<e 'pert rrly and paullel to tna Nort he [lY Iine mt old lot, ]] feet; [lien~e n,rtherly doog me Nerterly line of old Imt, 1]II foci tp the petof of Leel nnl rv;. yM,EEL_NO. IE ID6 po [i loo of lo[ :1, Se ct loo 1 iv ueanlp 1 S>u[h, 2rge 1 Vee[, ]ro ee rru [dl on Bue end He [ld4 v, secs rdl r; to nep of Cuumo vqa Rvi[ Vvdr, s per map r cortled fo Book v o! Mape, Pede 9, reco rda of old fuemrY, duo IDaO ee8lodg « [ polo[ ]]3.31 feet Vert ct tee linen ect my ul the Sou [ne rly LOYndl ry Iln! e( ArrvV Ppu[[ [vd [n[ '• erly Ev undaty Ilv[ vl iu[ver Avenue. c nenu Smu[h am pe ral lei t0 tl.e 4efcerly Eo'andary line of IDroe[ nvenue 8n0 feet; thence Eu[ end pf rel lei [o [ne Sout nerly pounds ry 11 ve of Ar mu Pau[e, 94.61 fee[; [hence North a:d Pe ral lxl m tTe '• [IY Ilve o[ tiro<r n 100 Sect, [beoc< 4n[ anv pardlel [0 tnr mu[ne r1Y 11 a! of nrrov Ibulse[oatve polvt of b<6l onl ot. jARCEL No. I1: 1TC po rt lvo of Int 31, 5<c[(ov 11, Tomen lp I South, Pa rye ] Vut, Sao B[roa rdl oo 8ue and Me rtd l+v, a vrel M tv map of Luumonge Fruit to ode, per sap r orded l0 8eok < of BADr, Fade 9, ro<ome et fold Couoq, eertribed u (ollous~ Come<mct :q a[ [he polo[ of :n[enec[IOn vl tnr Se~tTer 1Y Ilne of Ar roV Polito and [Te Vee[er1Y Ilna I iutner Avemm thence '•eu along the So u[nrrlY Ilne of Ar rov Pau[q 31).b tee[ [o the [rue [Dint at Eeyl nnl og, thence Souin ab parallel to the uut<NV tine of iur nr.r . i :Ud 1<et. [Ten[[ 4E<[ and paral l<l tv [ne Sou therlY Ilnr al Ar re, tirt.e w r„_ +nlvi oTlc` [ 34] b fe![ Irem [he Vee[e [lY IIn[ of Lrt n<r nvenue ~,•tTen ce North 1oU teat to [he Sou lhe[ly Ilee of ArroV Polite: [hence Eaa[ elovg the Sou toerly I1 ve of ArroV bate to tM poi mt of bedl n:u og. PARCEL N0. 14 STS[ pv r[fav of lot 31, Se c[lov II, iovmTlp I Seu th, Pe,ge i Nert, Le 9e rva rdl eo 8ue evd Merldlen, < ordl ri to M[P of Cuumo n8a Frul[ la e6<, e pcr up r [roes to Boot i of Mapv, Peg< 9, remrde of old muoty, du<ribed y lollwu Beglrmfq s[ [Te poloc at lo[<n e¢loo vl the S~u[he rly bovndery IAoe o[ Ar tau Pauli and the Nu[sr1Y bounduy 11 ne vl iurmr Avenue [hence Nu[ eloog [Te 9au [hs[ly byuvdery 11 me of Arrou Polite, ]V.b le«, thence Sou eh ab peril Ll to [Ta 4u[uly beunde ry ll os a[ iur<er Avenue, 300 feet, lTeoca EuC ao0 p erallQ to [M SvutM rly boundary Itne of Art o4 Pautq 311.6 fief; theeo Forth along tM Mute [ly boueea [y Iloe of Lurmr Avaoue, 300 Stet [o tTa poi e[ of be6l ml q. [ 1 %. Llaw`I RJVI' v l i i ~ i - GPI , 1 ,/~ t f o ,.. O lo.. 4 IC 21 N [ u « 4., EXHIBIT "N" rt S~~ 4 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 TO: City Council and city Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Administrative Assist ant ~~ I}~'~'~~ SU6 JECT: Inter-Agenc~Meet ings and Communications RECOMMENDATION: ~ 9 z,; ~1, ~~~> _ is ~! F_ ~ pZ It is recommended the City Council direct at off Lo begin scheduling meetings with the six City Comm iasione, the County, all of the School Dist ricte, Cha Efey College and the two Water Districts that serve our community. It is further recomune nded that these meetings begin after July 1 as we begin the new fie cal year. Staff further recommends that if these meetings are set up, the School Cistr icts a.-.L Chat toy Co llega be schedule3 beCoae I,he sew sc i~ooi wear begins in the fall. This recommendation is based on an expressed interest of some of the Schcol Districts to discuss matters of mutual interest before the new school year begins. 9ACKGROUND Staff receivetl direction from the City Council to contact all the aforementioned grcu pa to Lets r,-,i ne whether they wuuid be interested en having meetings with the City Council to discuss matters of mutual interest. To date, the City hoe received positive responses from all the Schocl Dietr ict s, bctn Water Districts, all City Commissions and Chaffey College. As of yet the County has not yet responded, but has been recontacted to determine whether or not they find the proposal for joint meetings Eavo rable. At Chic t.,,,.. ,, ,..,.f stands ready for Council's direction to arranye the ten -' "'..- ......,.. ...,... ....e .a..o,.a yrv~Pa nic nL iuued above, so that martcra nr mutual4 interest scan be Lis ru ssed. DAR:j1s 89-286 57~ CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 17, 1989 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ~icsatq x~.\= ~ F Ci Z BY: Otto Rroutil, Deputy City Planner SL'BJ ECT: GROWTH MANAGEMENT - Initial schedule for the 13-point work program rel afe~to the management of growth in Rancho Cucamonga. I. RECOMMENDATION: This is an informational item. With the City ounn s concurrence, staff will proceed as outlined. Mo fcrmal action is necessary. II. BACKGROUND: At the April 5, 1989 meeting and a previous workshop, EFe C~~ouncil identiffed thirteen areas df interest affecting the management of growth. Staff was directed to develop a work schedule and a program to address these thirteen points. To accomplssh these tasks will require a coordinated effort by all City departments and some outside agencies. This report outiines urc horn rwirq, .a i .. y.a i.. ~..i. .~ ..~ ..gyp... .~.~~.. , end provides an initial schedule. III. THIRTEEN-POINT ACTION PROGRAM: 1. OE VELOP A GROWTH MAN/+B EMENT PLAN ORGANIZATIONAL GU IOE WITH Preparation of an informational document containing a comprehensive listing of ali growth management-related programs now in effect. To be organized as a guide to existing policies, Drograms and ordinances, with specific Minicipal Code references. Prl ma ry responslbi lity: Planning ..i ., r.,.: ., r...ma~~~s„ io..nr Supports r,. ~: .. y.,.ccri^9, Status/Timing: Draft for City Council revi a+-August, 1989. 57g CITY COO NC IL STAFF REPORT G ROWIH MANAGEMENT May 17, 1989 Page 2 2. INTEGRATE LAW ENFORCEMENT FiNANC ING THROUGH FUTURE ME LLO-ROOS Since Rancho Cucamonga's percentage share of the property tax is very low, it must look to other funding sources to assist in providing adequate service levels. Setting up a Law Enforcement Community Facilities District is one such avenue. On June 7, 1989, a public hearing is scheduled to ne!eh l: gh !h> r: !y 'g i. reh I_]w Fn fn rra~ent Di e!rir4 in th,a future, other properties can be annexed into the rew Community Facilities District. Primary responsibility: Resource Service Department Support role: Finance/Sheriff Status/Timing: Underway; Initial hearing June 7, 1989; Implementation Fiscal Year 1984/90 3. RE-EVALUATE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEES WHEN THE CITY'S NEW The transportation model for Rancho Cucamonga and its sphere of influence that will establish an adequate LransDortati on planning tool capable of evaluating traffic impact on the City bridge and thoroughfare system, including the transit mode split, that can help determine our City's transportation needs is scheduled to be finalized in July, 1989. The model will forecast future transportation impact for City build-out .~ The transportation model study will produce a procedure establishing the nexus which is mandated by AB 1600 when bridge and thoroughfare system fees are imposed on a development. This study will update the City's system fee ordinance to current requirements and funding needs. Primary responsibility: Engineering Division Status/Timing: Underway; Modes study to be completed fn September, 1989 4. REQUfRE PUBLIC FACILITIES AIN INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PLANS FOR I'n mnilp l!.•oo• lmnn.\~lomon! ]nll nnit n]/1C ~mnYl\V GI110I11 v.. ~..,. ~ i .. ......... • ....,..... -...- .... ...... ........~ .~- ....Y. -. -... ~.. - Implementation Policies and phasing plans presently in use. Policies are avaiiable for the Terra Vista Community Plan, and similar policies can be developed for the Ylctoria Community Plan. 5~ 5 CITY COU NC SL STAFF REPORT GROWTH MANAGEMENT May 17, 1989 Page 3 Criteria will be developed for the preparation of Phasing Plans for Street and Transportation System. The general criteria will establish guidelines far requirements to build critical elements of the City's transportation network, full- width street improvements, City Master Plan facilities, and Sub-Regional and Regional facilities required as a result of Imo ac is from development of planned communities. rri teM:e far .he .~.: o.^. of oho s: ng of ans for 5rnwn drainage systems wil In be-developed consistent with the adopted master plans for drainage adopted by the City. Storm drainage improvements far planned communities will be reviewed for consistency with existing policies to adequately protect the new developments and the existing community. Primary responsibility: Engineering Support role: Planning Status/Timing: Draft for City Council review by IWgust, 1989. 5, EVALIATE FEAST BI L[TY OF INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL CONTRIBUTION TD This involves a survey of other communities using fee structures other than the Quimby Act in an attempt to generate a wider and more flexible base for park acquisition and maintenance. Ne will also examine the po remit al effect of commercial/industrial fees on the economic development of the community (i.e. tax base and employment opportunities). Primary responsibility: Community Services Support role: City Attorney, Planning Status Timing: Underway; initial recommendation to City Council June, 1989; Preparation of necessary ordinances, Summer, 1989 6. EVALUATE PRESENT DISTRIBUTtON OF MULTI-FAMILY ZONING. A study of multi-family land use designations City-wide. Will contain an assessment of areas already developed, vacant land with previous approvals, as well as an inventory of vacant land designated for multi-family development without n} alo Wi lr glen al~uf< f_lin il~ef riia lf~nn andy balance of single and multiple family housing at the City's build-out. Primary responsibil7ty: Planning Status/Timing: Underway; Initial report to City Council duly, 1989; Ad dittonai work dependent on policy direction t~ CITY COUNCIL STPFF REPORT GROWTH MANAGEMENT May 17, 1989 Page 4 7. REQUIRE TESTING OF NEW HYDRANT SYSTEMS PRIOR TO PROJECT A program to insure that necessary water flows for fire protection are attained in development processes. Will necessitate additional expenditures by developer and additional staff time in verification of intended results. Pri~,y.y ~ospo„si b; 7i ry• Feeth,'17 ci re prorec r,'„e n;srr; cr Status/Timing: Underway; Report on annual basis at end of fiscal year 8. REQUEST CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TO EXAMINE THE c A program to verify that existing fire hydrants throughout the City are maintained in proper working order. Wfil include development of cooperative participation from the Water District and assignment of forces to conduct field tests and inspection. Primary responsibility: Foothill Fire Protection District Status/Timing: Preliminary contacts made; Report on commencement and scheduling to City Council August, 1989 9. CONSIDER DEVELOPING A FINANCIAL PLANNING TOOL TO ACCOMPANY Growth will require infrastruciure development, infrastructure maintenance, and increased service levels. Each item requires revenue sources. Currently, staff is reviewing its fee structures, financing sources, and potential revenue sources that must be there to complement the growth in the City. Primary responsibility: Resource Services Support: Finance, Engineering, Planning, Community Services, Building & Safety, Disaster Preparedness, Redevelopment Agency, law Enforcement, School Districts, Water District, Fire District and AAnfnistration Status/Timing: On-going 5~/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GROWTH MANAGEMENT May 17, 1989 Page 5 10. CREATE PUBLIC EDUC ATiON OF THE CiTV'S GROWTH PIANAG EMENT MEOIA:-- A program aimed at informing and educating the general public about the City's efforts to manage growth of`ectiv2ly. A series of articles in the Grapevine, the first focusing on the Growth Management program in general, with ad ditiona1 ari:icles .,.. ^" "'-""-" ==^:porc,.., o` tFe pr-og ra~~~ ici rcuiaii on, parks and recreation, community services capital projects, etc.). Primary responsibility: Community Services others to participate according to expertise Status/Timing: A regular series starting with the November '89 issue 11. CONSIDER WORK SESSIONS WITH THE CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER -ON- WATER A program for maximizing connection of new and existing structures to the public sewer rather than to private disposal systems. Will evaluate the facilities of the two districts for capacities and availability, the effect of private disposal systems upon ground water ool lutiun thr axte nt of health problems attributable to improper disposal and the effect of requiring connection to the public sewers as a condition of development. Wi11 also explore measures to ~~~~- ~~y= wu; rc~Li~ue in aireauy oui it-up areas. Requires cooperation of CCIJD and Chino Basin for infrastructure development, acceptance of waste, and formation of assessment districts in unsewered areas. Primary responsibility: 6ui ldinq & Safetv Di vi Sinn Status/Timing: Preliminary contacts made; Report to City Council September, 1989 !2. CONTiMUE QUARTERLY MEETINGS WITH THE VARIOUS SCHOOL DISTRICT SUIsERTNTEN6EflTS..-AN6-OPEN-0~-S7ECTFIC- MAAAGEMENT------ --- ?he .^i ty Manager's office will continue discussions wi th all soh oo~ district superintendents to review growth management Primary responsibility: Administration Sta tus!Ti mi rg; Ongoing S~a-- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GROWiH MANAGEM[NT May 17, 1989 Page 6 13. CONSIDER THE ESIABLISNMENT OF APPROPRIATE STANDARDS FOR THE In 1988, the Commnity Task Force Committee identified public facilities needed within the City to service its residents and businesses. Standards have been adopted by City Council pertaining to the follwing public facilities identified in the Comm~i ttee report: amphitheaters, comnuni ty centers, swi inning competitive pools, fine arts center, golf/driving range, gymnasiums, natural areas, trails, performing arts, senior center!services, youth/teen centers, active and passive sports needs (football, baseball, soccer, basketball, swimming, jogging, fishing, etc .1 In addition, the master plan for Civic Center and Public Safety facility needs have been adopted by Council to insure service to the public. Areas where no standards or guidelines exist for public facilities include the foll oiling: library, cultural arts facility, museum, children's museum, computer center, conference training center, occupational vocational training facility, nature center, arboretum, historical ..!:Fable e!n nMin N ran mild It will be necessary to establish appropriate standards or guidelines for these categories of public facilities which will meet needs of population. Primary responsibility: Community Services Status/Timing: Underway; Initial report to City Council July, 1989; Additional work dependent on policy direction With the City Council's concurrence, staff will proceed with these work program items as outlined. Resp~Ct~{d ly sub~,~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ `~ < Bra Bul City a ner BB:OK:ko ~3 ---- CITY OF RANCHO CL-CAYIOtiGA ~ca~.»D "~°~ STAFF REPORT ~~~" ~ } ~ " _ s ~~ _ ~ _ ~~ yy ~~~~ ^ r - L ~ DATE: May 17, i9B9 i„ To: Mayor, Members of The Council and City Manager x Rubs: Joe Schultz, Community 8ervlCes Manager BY: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator Sti BJECT: Consideration of a Community Design For a Three Acre Park On Alta Cuesta Drive South of Base Line Road in The Red Hill Area Recommendation: City Council accept the recommendation of the Park and Recreation Commission and adopt the community generated conceptual plan for a three acre site located on Alta Cuesta Drive, South of Base Line Road, and authorize the development of construction drawings. That the park be named Alta Vista and a memorial plaque be placed in commemoration of Tiburcio Tapia. Finally, funds be allocated to complete the sidewalk connections to the nark on Alta Cuesta Drive and Valle Vista P,oads from general fund capital reserves. Background: u>, r.y council in 1'1 B9 approved a conceptual plan Tor a neighborhood park in the Red Hill area called Creekside Park. the plar. was developed in conjunction with the Army Corp of Engineers as part of landscaping and recreation improvement along the Cucamonga/Demens flood control channels. Community objecticn to the design surfaced when authorization was requested to develop working drawings for construction of the park. To overcome the community objection, City Council, on the recommendation of the Park and Recreation Commission, appointed a ten-member Community Design Committee. The committee through a series of meetings, developed the concept as shown with Exhibit "A". - - ---' - - `u`ic deaiyii Uic mcmbecs LeiL imporiani, were, first ,lcthe~landscaping should heautify and make a statement about Red Hill. Secondly, the design should express the historical significance of the area. 5~ / Consideration of Creekside Redesign May 17, 1989 Page Two Tc incorporate those elements, the design includes a large center section devoted to turf open space. Surrounding the turf is extensive landscaping with flowering shrubs and trees. she committee expressed a strong desire to see color introduced into the landscaping for visual appeal and to attract birds and wild life. South of the open space will be an historical monumentation viewing area. Utilizing the meadow effect created by the open space and the mountains north of Rancho Cucamonga as a back drop, the viewing area has a grape arbor covering wcod benches. Located in front of the benches will be a flower planter surrounding a granite boulder on which an historical plaque will be mounted. The plaque is suggested to be inscribed with the wording recommended by the Historical Preservation Commission and modified by the Park and Recreation Commission as shown with Exhibit "B". other elements of the design include a loop trail system with exercise stations. The committee recommends the trail surface be composed of natural material utilizing decomposed granite or a soil cement treatment. They also suggest the park be connected to the Cucamonga/Demens Trail system with a utiuye uv et ~iie wa sit. Iu evuiu uw:CiiuL LeLweeu eyueeu inu use of the trail and park, the design has an equestrian rest area on the lower channel ].eve1 with fencing to prohibit horse access to the upper park level. Additionally, the design has a children's play area to be developed with rustic earthtone equipment, a covered group picnic area and individual picnic table locations, restroom facilities and off-street parking for eight vehicles. when the committee reached concurrence on the design, they suggested tho_ park name be changed to Don Tapia Park in honor of Tiburcio Tapia and his development of the Cucamonga land grant. The Historical Preservation Commission felt the title Don would be confused with Donald and suggested the name 6e __., cp:.a .. ,. the park should be named Alta Vista for the relationship ^of the two streets adjacent to the park, Alta Cuesta and Valle Vista. 58~ Consideration cf Creekside Redesign May 17, 1989 Page Three Additionally, the design committee felt it important to connect the missing links of sidewalks to the proposed park. .ay -eq~este3 ty - .__ ~ _ she _ _ a ____e __ _ Alta ~CUesta Drive to Base V Line RoadcW and ythe ^missing approximate 1500 linear feet on Valle Vista. Tnis link would connect the park and Valle Vista elementary School. The committee understood park development fees are dedicated funds and could not be expanded on this work. City Council will have to allocate funds from a different source, should you concur with the committee. Finally, the Planning Corwission viewed the proposed concept at their May 10, 1989 meeting. Tha commission comments were they would like to see more shaded trees around the play area; use of drought tolerant landscaping; hard surfacE improvement of the trail from the channel up to the park; provisions for bicycles and that the park name be Don Tapia Park. DL/mg Enclosures ~" ~, l ' it ~' i ' ~ i ~ a ~i ~~ i ,I, ~ `~) q 91 ]i ~ f ~ v :~~~ 3~1 ~ ~' ~\ ` iJ ~]f,i .* l,~Y ', t ei 1 ~',i ~~ ,~ ~~. ;' 5~~ 9 3 Is ;~ ~~a~s ,~igsd w't ~; eq ~~ ~'~ i'I i ~~u ~,-, ., %, ~i I~!! I~ ~~u~ ?! I (-~ t', i F, I \ ~I „fir 11~ ~/~ 1VIJ M~ • V ~ ~ /V \'~J ~~,\T :%fI~~ I I~~ ._ ., ~,~, L-r i.oi/_i I. 1/_.I -r11G /lo~-! _rirA ~s>L A:~1~r"cl~ '~N THE i7~r~, iN ~~~~ -'`nom M~x~.rl -~iF.~~i1M~,vT ~T~NTr-D A ~ ~, ~ /~G ~„~.I~•~ "(O TICUr~UG T~'~P1~ j..II~G ~L_I~1T ~J ~~~ ~~'T~~ v~ Tf t~ .~"U~~t~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~;~ ~ ~ . N~~~ rl~ ~~.~ET~~ .~i'1~1~L YI ~~ r,R~ ~RI~S~ rfv~/ ~i-11 ~ G' ~J VwTG~.:r,G . I T ~.% 'ZL-iM ~~Ti ^I~IAT 1?~T~~ H~~ ~,-~ ~rJ i -~+s N~ ~u~~~.a ~1-I~:T _:*-~ ~r~;H~~ i~ -'i HG ~~ ail,;, ,= ~;~~ EXHIBIT B ~~~+ --- -~ ~ - CITY OF RANCI~(i CI'('AMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ , DATE: May 17, 1989 '~, TO: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager i FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager ' SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS MAKING FINDINGS ON ~~I PETITION, MAKING APPOINTMENTS AND APPROVING ~~, AGREEMENTS FOR PROPOSED ASSESSME"IT DISTRICT 89-1 ~I IMILLIKEN AT ARROWI ~ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council adopt the attached Resolutions I making findings on petition, making appointments and approving agreements for proposed Assessment District No. 89- 1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received a petition signed by the cwners of property located on the South side of Arrow Route at Miliiken Avenue to undertake special assessment proceedings. City Staff and the City's Assessment District Consultants have been meeting with the developer 10'Donnell Armstrongl Ear Forming the district. This district lis propcsed to be an acquisition district with the developer Constructing the various offsite improvements and the City purchasing the improvements wit,`, the bond proceeds. f7BS S,owry, Assessment Engineer, has reviewed the pet axon and determined that 60; of the property owners have executed same. The petition meets all requirements of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The boundary of the proposed district is genex'a 11y South of Arrow Route, North of 8th Street at Milliken Avenue (see attached mapi. Th_ _ _ __ _____ P ltl !'lll (1 PY1 ,'11'P (]YA1116UC C>t:111i.1Ei~ accompaniedobynstreet improvements, street lights, utilities lincludxng underground i.ng of ex i.sting overhead line on Arrow Route, railx'oad crossing, striping, landscaping of the median island on Milliken Avenue, water and sewer facilities, The estimated bond sale is $4.Z million. S ~°/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 89-1 Milliken at Arrow May 17, 1969 Page 2 City staff has selected the consulting team and listed below are the firms corresponding to the attached agreements. Brown & Diven NBSiLOwry F+.?ldman, Rnlapn rv AnSnc Stone and Youngberg Special Ccunsel Assessment Engineer Financial Consultant Underwriters R gspectfnl ly su bm itt.ed, erry B. Fulwood eputy City Manager JBF:de Attachments s-9o v 20 oQ ~~ . ~• h s j~ a Q~ i Q~ e 0 ~ l V` Oz Ry ~u <r --~--:r.~-~: ~ [' i > ' '`' ie , a~ {j:' ~ i. '.. _:; ~; sir f!t!!!!!!!!3! !!3!x!!!11 ~E,ESEEEEESf;`~EEFF€{E;FE ii " ~~6'11199i'Hi'ff:SS tttt lE~~~~iEEEEEE~EE~EE~~EEE~~~ E vo ae:::~::! vv.~;~a: FEf ~131J11911d1113d133d11311<<~ ~ IFE;::EQiP'F!!t!!Eiltl!!!lsE;I !~€:iEE[i[E'6EEE:El:EiE[dElii! Fe .I '~ '-~ 1 i T~~i RESOLUTION N0. ~ 7 . ~ ~[~ RESGLUT ION Or' THE CITY CCUNC I:. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA:_IFORNLA, MTiltING A°JCI"l TTAENTS AND APPROVING AG.°.EEMENTS IIJ A SPECIA:, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT iw:gc Ac the rrmy rnpvr r. ~f she rrTy nr Ra run rtir aunty^. a, rn_rcr,oyrn is considering the forrc;ati on cf a special assessment district, pursuant tc the terms and orovisicns of the "M.unicipal Imprev ement Act of 1913", being Div is icn 12 cf the Streets and Highways Code cf the State of CaliECrnia, fcr the construction of certain public wer ks of imarov ement, tcgeth er with appurtenances and appurtenant work, said scec:al assessment district to be known and d=_signated as ASSESSMENT PIS:RICT N0. 39-1 ;hereinafter referred tc as the "Assessment District"I: and, WHEREAS, at th xs tame, this legislative body is desirous cE making the regnir ed appointments and aes!gnat ing nerscns to perform certain duties, in cyder tc allow the proceedings to go Forward to completion in accordance with the provisions of law. NOW. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESGLVEG AS FOLLOWS: SECTEGiJ 1. Thal the above roc Gals are ail true and correct. SECTION 2. That the CITY ENGINEER is hereby appointed to perform .. ..~ ,,,,~ ............... .. .. •~ ..rte ..~ ,... .. Streets as saidcduties are specified and designated in the "Municipal Imorov eaent Act of 1313', being Division 12 of tiie Streets and Highways Code of the State cf CaLifcrnia, fcx the shove-referenced Assessme^t. Da tract. SECTIGtJ 3. Taat t'ne place for recordation of the assessment roll and diagram shah 'ce in the Office of the Scoerintendent cE Streets, and said assessment roll and diagram, upon recordation, shail be kept as a permanent record. SECTION 4. That the DAILY' REP03T is hereby designated as the newspaper for ali pu'cl :cations as required 6y law and as necessax°y for cortpleticn of this Assessment District. SECT IGtJ 5. Tnat NSS/LGIJRY is her ehy appointed the Assessment Eogiaeer for said nrcueedings, and said Assessment Engineer shall perform all cE the duties and responsibilities as set forth by law as they relate to said Assessment District, pursuant to the terms and cond a ions of an Agreement subrra tted herewith, which Agreement is hereby accepted and approved Eor execution. 59~- CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 89-~ Milliken at Arrow May 17, 1989 Page 2 SECTION o. That 3ROwN 6 DIl'EIJ, Attcraeys at Law, is aereby appc inted to act as Hend Counsel for the purposes of preparing proceed ings and issuing an approving opinion attesting tc the validity of the proceedings and the enfacc eability of tae bonds, pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Special Ceonsel Agreement submitted n erewitn, which Pgreement is nerecy accepted and approved fcr execution. SECTION 7, That BI ELDMAtJ, ROLA~P 6 ASSOCIATES is hereby appointed as Financial Consultant Ecr these creceeaings, pursuant to the terms and conditions of an Agreement submitted herewith, whica Agreement is hereby accepted and approved far execution. SECTION B. 1'a at STONE 6 YOUIJGBERG is hex eby apps inted as the Underwriter for these proceedings and bonds to be issued pursuant to the terms an8 provisicns of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 1D of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 9. That a REIMEURSEMENT AGREEMENT by and between the City a.^.d .°.CDC As=_oci at=s, a C=_Lfornia limit=d norther shin, is submitted herewith, which Agreement is herehy accepted and approved foc execution. SECTI0IJ 1~, That this legislative body hereby establrshes a special IMPP.OVEMENT BOND designated by the name and number of the Assessment District, and into said fund shall he placed all proceeds from the sale cf bcnds and cash ccllect is ns. In order to expedite the improvements or 3^_gu tSi tier antler t.^.e ae proceed!ngs and a5 dUbhOr~znd 'Oy law, funds from any available source may be transferred rntc said special fund. Any funds transferred are a lcan to the funU and shall be repaid out of the proceeds cE the sale of bcnds, tnc lading authorized incidental exne uses, as well as costs for the construction cf the authorized pu6l is improvements, all as required and anth prized by law, and spec iE ically Section 10210 of the Str?ets aed H~gn~days Code of the State of California. 593 RESOLUTION N0. ~~" ~ y/ RESOiUT10N OP THE CITY COUNCIi OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIF03NIA, MAI(ING FIIJDIIJGS O1J RETITION WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIi cf the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON3A, CALIFORNIA, has been presented by certain nroperty cwners an executed Petiticn r eq'aestiag the construction of certain public imprevements, together with aecurtenanc es and appurtenant work in connection therewith, said ar„Yi cvaa,eats ' a ccn_ _ _d par-scant `_ _e .____ _d provisi o.-s o_ the "MunicipalVImprovement,Act of 1913" V being Division 13 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. E9- 1 Ihereinaf ter referred to as the "Assessment District'!; and, WHEREAS, it has bee^ reported that sa rd Petitrcn contains the sigaa tares cf more than sixty perc 2nt 16041 of the prcperty owners of the assessable area of the property to be subject to assessment far the proposed works of improvement. Said Petition meets the requirements of Section 2E 04 of Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code cf the State of CaliEorn ia. HOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HERERY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the above rec ita is are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Thar it is hereby found that said 'r etit ion has been signed by owners owning land constituting mare than sixty percent 16041 of all aesessa ble land within the SECTLOIJ 3. That said Pet itien shall be filed with the tran scx rat cf Chese rreceedrngs and shall remain cpen tc public inscectian, SECTIOIJ 4. That said Petition mee±s th_ requir emeats of Sectio^ 28 D-0 of Giv isicn 4 cf the Streets and Highways Code cf the State of California, and further proceedings and limitations under the pr ovis tons ox t'ne "5peaial Assessment Invzsttgation, Limitation and Majorit}' protest Act cf 1931" shall net be applicable to these proceedings. SECTIOtJ 5. Tais legtslatrve body hereby further finds and the~tetal' estimated amo•ant~^cf ~the~proposed~assessments will not exceed seventy-five percent 17541 of the estimated fair market value of the land proposed fo be assessed after the proposed pu'olic improvements shall have been constructed. 59' y CITY COUNCIL NESOLUTION 89-1 Milliken at Arrow May 17, 1989 Page 2 SSCTIGN 6. That it is hareby further determined and found that said Petition has been signed by not Daly the property cwner s, as specified ir, Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Ccde, but also any mortgagee or benefit iary ander any such existing mortgage or deed of test, as required by Section 2804.2 cf the Streets and Highways Code of the State et Cant orma, SECTION 7, This legislative body does hereby Eur th er find and deterrtine that the property owner has waived all rights whit'[ orcperty owner may have under Streets and Highways Code Sections 5890.5 and 5896.5 perta ring tc the initiation of proceed ings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act cf 1913" Eor the conversion of ex ati ny overhead electric and ccmmunication facilities to underground locations. ~~ ~~ _9167; SD9011 04; 29/99 ASSESSMENT D_TSTRIC: REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT THIS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into th'_s day cf :989, by ar.d between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a public agency of the State of California ("City"), and RC DC ASSOCIATES L.P., a California Limited Partnership ("Proper ~y O~a.^.e r"). 3 E C I T A L 5 WHEREAS, Property Owner owns certair. real property that at this time 1s proposed ro be included 'a!thin the boundaries of a proposed special list r_ct where City would be ccnducting pro- ceedings ur.dec the prcvisicns of the "Municipal Improvement Act of i913," being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of tine State of Caiifern'_a, said special district hereinafter known and designated as Assessment District 90. 94-1 (the "Assessment District"); and WHEREAS, City is authorized to enter this Agreeme r.t pursuant to the authorization o_` "Municipal Improvement Ac: of 1913," being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Ccde o° the State of Calico rn ia; and WHEREAS, Property Owner has agreed to advance funds to allow City to pay for the Initial consulting and administratio r, ~«~ nA ~o~ .o ~~oA •.. c~fA ..~ooAln +.A Inc hainn subject to~rermbursement upon a successful sace of bonds; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to enter into this Agree c.e nt 7; provide Eor she advancement of funds and reimburse- c,ent for monies previously adva r,ced. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the parties as fo;.lows: correct. Sectcon 1. Recitals. :he above recitals are all true ar.d Sect_cr. 2. Advancement and Reimbursement of Monies. P:cnerty Owner shall advance monies ^.o City upon demand to pay " anri r.a ff qri r~i niatrat i,~n necessarvmEorr~thenformation^oE It henASSessment District, and iE said costs are not advanced, the consulting services will not proceed. Ci~y agrees to keep records to clearly show the amour.[ cE menies advanced for preliminary consulting, administrative and regal expenses, and cpor, cempietion of the proceedings and a ~~T successful sale of bonds, all mo r.ies advanced shall be reimbursed .e ?rope:ty Owner ir. cash. Section 3. Services Paid by Adva,^.ceme r.t s. The costs acd expenses adva r.ced shai: pay Eor the Eollcw ir.g services: rwi a~~a~~mo.,« (c) Financial Consultant; (d) Appraiser; and (e) C ty Admir.ist:ative ~_ime. For the scope o' the work and terms and conditions of the contracts for the above-referenced consultant or consultants, -eference is made t the contracts attached hereto as Exhibits "A°, "B", "C" and "D", and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Schedule of advancement of Monies. T. Fe monies to be advanced shall be deposited and advanced to City oursua r.t .o the Following schedule: (a) At the time of execution of this Agree- ment, Th i_ ,-Five Thousa rd Dollars ($35,000.00); and ~o) rr aealc!o na! n~.onies are r.ecessecy, ~i~_y shall mate dema r.d upon Property Owner and Property Owr,er s hail, within five (5) working days, deposit said a.onies .,ith City to cover the balance cf the costs and zxpenses. LE such additional monies are not received as specified in r.h is Subsection (6), the Citv shall cease all consultant and other work pertaining to the formation cE the Assessment District until such funds are received. Section 5. Abandonment of the Proceedings. If the oroceedir.gs ace not successful and aze abandoned prior to any successful sale of bonds, City will have no o6liga[ions to reim- b~.irse Property Owner for ar.v costs and expenses advanced, and Ci r~ does agree to reimburse Property Owner out of anv surpi'.a monies adva r.ced pursuant to this agreement wnich City has on deposit in excess of those needed for final payment of consulting services and/or administrative time. Section 6. Possession of Preliminary Documentation, A11 pans, reports, and other pr~elim~nary documentation as prepared -z- 59 ~ pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of City, regardless as ro whether the Assessment District is actaally formed extent fcr the plans and specifications for the improve- ments and other documents provided to City by ?ropertp Dwr.er and the Appraisal which sha;.l become the oronerty of Property Owr.ee. Notwithstanding the f.oregcing, Property Owner shai. be entit:ed to a copy of t::^.e Engineer's Report and all Resoiuti ons passed by City :with respec^_ to the Assessment UisLrict. Section 7. No Obiiqaticr. on City. This Agreement does _ _ny ay ____L2 __ __ _yaLi__ __ __ rig hat ty i__ decide `O DLOCeedc'alt.9a t;neuA55e55menLLDiSCC1Ct, sand City w expressly reserves the right to abandon the proceedings at any time prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. Se ct:on 8. Authority. Each individual and entity executing this Agreement hereby represents and warrants chat he/she or '_ has the capacity set forth on [he signature pages hereof with~Eul: power and authority to bind the party on whose behalf hejshe or it is executing this Agreement tc the torms hereof. Section 9. Entire Agreement. This Agreement 's th e~ entice agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supercedes all prior agreements between the parties with respect to the matters contained in th'_s Acreement. Any ~aa fiver, nctification, consent or accuiescence with respect to any provision of this Agreement shah be set forth in writing and duly executed by or on 6ehaif of the party to 6e bound thereby. No waiver by any party of any breach hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. Section 10. Notices. All notices, information, requests ar.d other communications to be given to any party hereunder sha.1 be fir. wr, .^_ing and shall be given to such party, addressed to i_, at its address cr teiecopy number set forth below or at such oche: address or teiecopy number as such party may in the Eutur2 specify for such purpose by notice to the other party. Each such notice, ir.f ormation, request or communication shall be effective (a) if given by teiecopy, when such teiecopy is transmitted to the `elecony number specified below, (b) if given by mail, Eive (5) days after such communication is deposited in the mails with ~t-crass po.=,tage prepacd, addressed as aforesaid, or (c)_f riven h_y a_ny n7Fc- m__,._, mhcn doli,_rcrd ar the addre cc cpa_rFicd be :ow. -3- S~~ City: City of Ra r•c ho Cucamonga P.O. Sox 807 Rancio CnComO r•ga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. ,i erry F,::wocd Pho r.e: (714) 989-185: =elecopy: (714) 987-6499 With a copy to: crown b Diven :27%0 High P1uff Drive, Suite 240 San Giego, CA 92130 Attention: Warren B. ~lven, Esq. P'none: (619) 456-1915 Ielecopy: (619) 259-0292 P: c_oe: tv Owner: RCDC Associates L.P. c/o O'Donnell, Armstrong 5 Partr.e rs 2201 Dupont Drive, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92713-9583 Attention: Nr. Gonald S. Grant Phone: (714) 85:-011: ^elecopy: (714) 851-0109 With a copy to: Cox, Castle 6 Nicholson 2049 Century Park East, S.~i[e 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Attention: Lewis G. Feldman, ~sq. Phone: (213) 277-4222 Telecopy: (213) 277-7889 Section 11. Headings. Section headings in this Agreement are ir,c hided _`or co m~enience of reference only and sha 1.1 not consticate a part of this Agreement Eor any other purpose. Sectio r. 12. SeverabilitY. Any provision of this Agreeme r,t t nat is prohibited, ~,: r•enforceable or not authorized in any juris- diction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibitzcn, unenforceahility or nonauthorization ..ithout invalidating the remaining provisions of this Agreement or affecting the validity, enforceability or authorization of Bach provision in any ether 'urisdiction. Secti ~r• 13. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be ,-veined ~oy, and ccnstrued and interpreted in accords ice with, - c~ roi ate.. .,ate choice-Hof-law~nrincio:es thereof .~ V ..--•.vV•~ •~-~•~••y~ -V -••- Sect on 14. Attorneys' ?ees. If any action is hrought by either party against the other pasty, the prevailing party shall _4_ / / be entitled to recover E: om the other party reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred ir. connection with the oresecu- ron or defense of Bach action. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "attorneys' fee r' sha 11 mean the tees and expenses of counsel to the parties hereto, which :nay include printing, photcstating, du piicatiny and other expenses, air freight charges, and fees billed Eor law clerks, paralegals and other persons r.ot admitted to the 5ar but performing se roices ender the supervision of an attc:ney. Section .5. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement sha:: be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, t'.^.e parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Section 16. Assignment. Property Owner shall have the right, subject to the prior approval of City, noe to be unreason- ably withheld, to assign all of its right, title and interest under this Agreement ro any third party of its choosing. -5- //--~~TT /V IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the oarties have caused this Agreement to be executed as cE the day and year Eirst above a r_tten. CITY: CITY Os RANCHO CQCAMONGA, a A:TEST: APPROVF,D AS TO FORM: PROPERTY OWNER: RCDC ASSOCIATES L.P., a California Limited Partnership Rv~ R(' 'ln valnmm~nY i,. 2.. a California Limited Partnership, 'ts General Partner By: 13i Development inc., a Caii Eornia Limited Partnership, ' its General Partner f~'` -~` me: Dona d S. Grant its: CEO ~b~ Y ~/ ..'. ~'!~CC% CA9'.c V: ~''°C.Sgn 1-tf-t9 ]:'FF4 1'd uc7 ?d'n5~ i'Cr". ?:d~^ EXHIBIT "A" ercclw cogNem. Agns¢xmNT TNIG AOR¢¢NLRT L• made and •nb <od Inca cn Le day c: !999, Oy ¢nd bib eeO Cho CI ST OF kANCMO CVCANONaA, CAL:fORmiA, a pubic corpo retLon fhe [tLn after ctferied to de •C Lt y"), and ¢ROHN G pIV¢4, ~h•rei ne It or ref 9Y Ced CO et "COUnee L'~. NOW, 1'XEREFORE, IT I9 RR AE 9y AGREED by and Cet wean tho per [lee De reto ae tnilowe: 96CT1 ON 1. Th •t Lnunul shell pa [[o[m Lgel new lc Oa !n Con neCt ion with tN propottd eunement prouee loge end Bona i e Ln cn• mace er e[ propo ud eDOela1 a Cement tlLtr:Ce known endedooaOneUd s• A99C99NCNT DxaTRIM No. D9 al• ;he [•lnaCtsr [ete[[vd to eh. •M uumene oLtrlc a^) undor pro ••dingt Bond uc<od pur u. nc co the prov to lane of the "Municipal tnprovement Act of 1911", being olr clan lx o: the ec:wt• end Nlghweyv Code of the Ct ett et Glitocn L~ as ld nevleo .hell xnelud/: A. R¢vlrw of the detllce[lOn end ecqu leition o[ ens etreete ena ee••- awnte entl ctter property In which wock le pf opo Nd to be performed; 9. ¢eaninet loh e[ eM plane end ep¢OlelucLOee for the Drvyoeed wo[k, thv bound ery map and tuowmont diagram of the AUHtment Olsc rlct, cM ueue:M nt roll •nd bond., and !pe yiv lnq Ot Lnetrmelon• end advice in ronnr_tlon with the foregoL~yl C, RecolAtendLL igno a• to procedure, och od~_oo acd act loot that should be conduct •d end Eakanr other pe pore end 1doc ununr.o raga L•od in eho proceedings; e. ¢xeminet Lon o[ the proceedings, otap by et•p, at tekenr F. Appear ec ell heed nqe under bht peooe•e_nge, and eteerd any mestAnq where ac tendenco !e rtquested~ C. Neke rtcanwentlet :e ne m t0 eel. Of bond t. Lf dotlred: N. porfOrm loyal eervlcu, 1[ required, pu reutnt to the pYOVlelOne of CRO "9poclel Ae o eem•nt Inve¢t Lgeilon, ilmltatlon tnd Me )arity pro<eet Act of 1911", bo lrp DSvlt ion d o[ tM SV wte end Nlghuaye Code of Cho 6tato o[ Ca1lLOCnlal i. IeeuenCe c( an approving legsl Opin100 etloo Clog tc the vel :ally of ~M1~ n •n:!lny~ entl [he Levanee oL the bo nd e. 1ucD legal eery ices eCQl not lnc lade any rvlcet In eonneation wleh the vcqu lpltlon, Dy eetament Or GOndemNtlOn'v of any eeeetNOtf 9i of ho[ In csreet In roe: propu2y nsc•eery for LOe prop0 tad Smprovementy. Th o• urvlo• cui be Nrovlded by counet 1. by tlperete e9 [etment, _[ de •ltad. [J r/ +Cb 5y~OC% Cdd'.E NiGhOlSpN h2E-ed 2:'EcV I 7'd eei $ldE~ i'7?'n i:3U 3 6YCTION :. Th et t}e Clty shall pertoen a tvllawe: A, Nrnleh tv counsel ouch wy, record., clc :a auech•e, and other docwaenta end proceadingo, or cart if Sed capioe thereof, a aro avell- eble end may b• r•aeonab ly requ teed by Cbune•1 Sn she performance e! the aecviuo Aaraundorr e. Pay to Coun ul a fio computed on ti:e ccnf lrmed eaauacpnt ea fo:lowel Oq3 -cRCYNf (l\( of Ch1 f/rat 63, a00,c00; ONB•NALP PEACYNT jl/7Y) from 9:, S00, CO1 CV t6, 500,000) OHY-POURTX PERCEgT ;1/3\1 from $6,SOG,001 co 510, gOn,L00i OHE-e roMTH Pe RCeNT (t/8\) on CAe bale no• kh•eea[. C. Payment of tM above-r•t•c•,-.c•d [•• rho 11 be n+ Eeliowa, fla dub d0d payaUlY dpp0 rata lpi of money tP Jm the Ole End delivery of bnndo to kno evcca•.fu1 und•rwrlc •r. OECTION 3. n the event the pcoeeed inga + • term ina Nd ov +ba ndo n•d prior to oampl•- tlon, Counsel one 1: be paid a waeoneb le feu fc: aa[v lce• re nd erad to date baud on •n hourly rata o[ p300. oo per hour, net to 'ere od $].500.00. iECTION <• Tn1Y AOraamant contanplatYa that Counaal uhsll pry all ordinary out-ot- poeNet expert uo Sncur[sd, lnc lading travel, telephone and copy, and the only expert ue <v Ua bLl LOd to Clty uou ld ba axtracrd In ery wasa nqe: end/a[ OVYYfd qnL mete Oa11Va[y Ye CY /pee. sECTtON 7. Coumal her, a ccur. wl•a sou coat and axpvnoe; aocu roe a mcy buuneee as • cond ltlon auUaoquon[ to Dornq an0a0 od as n emtavlt snc co the ~C Lt y. SECT [ON 6. Any end all not lc ee, dbmantla, lnvoicee and wr ltten Camelunlcat lone b Kwon the parclee hereto she 11 bs atldresud a• w[ tartA !n chl• pa ragr•ph 6. Tho belw namod lndly ldual a, furthormoro, •ha 11 ba thow Wrenn. pr Smerity reapone ml• tOr ens wrtorm+nce by cne Darelee under thle pgre•Mnt, apowM L DfVaq: Narren e. Olven 12770 N1gA ElOff Onw, 1210 Jan DlagD, G 91130 c[Tr oP aaxcmo Cucpxogca, ]n ry to lweod Revenue Coord Lnator P. o. sox eD7 Rancho Cuceronga, CA 91770 (~03 Any such notices, demands, invokes and written communications, 6y mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee 48 hours after deposit thereof in the United St at ea mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. SHCTIDW 7. Counsel shall not commence work under this Agreement until it hoe obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to City. Counsel shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agteement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Compensation Inaura nce: eef ore beginning work, Counsel shall foolish City a cart if Lcate of lneurance as proof that St hoe taken out worker's compensation insurance for all persona whom It may employ Ln carrying out the work epecif letl herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of Cal lfornie. In accordance with the proviaione of California Labor Code 53700, every employer shell secure the payment of compensation to hie employees. Counsel shell sign and file with the Clty a certifica- tion ae follows: ' "Brawn b Dlven le awa[e of the proviaione of Section 3700 of the Labor code, which require every employer Lo be insured against liability for worker's compeneat ion and to undertake self insurance in accordance with the proviaione of the Code, and Brown b Divan will comply wlih such proviaione before commencing Lhe performance of th le Agreement". Ibl Puhlic Llab ility and Procerty Oamaee: Th rouehout the term of this Agreement, at Cou nest's sole coat and expense, Couneal shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual Denef it of the City and Counsel, comprahens ive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance agel.nst claims and liebl- lltlea for personal injury, death or property damage arising from Counsel's ac tivitlee, providing protection of et least $1,000,000.00 for bodily injury or death to any one per eon or for any one accident or occurrence and at least $1,000,000.00 for property damage. (c) Errors and omleelone: Couneal shall take out and maintain at ell times tluring the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors or omlee lone (^mnlpract Lca") providing protection of at least $2,000,000.00 for er rote and omissions with -expect to loos arising from actions of Covneel performing legal services hereunder un behalf of City. (d) General Inaurenca Requirement e: All lneurance required by express reason of thle•Agreement shell be cart led In reepone Lbla lneurance compan lea llcenaed to do business In the State of Cal lfornie end pollc lea requested under paragraphs (a) and (b) herelnabove shall name ee eddlt tonal insureds Clty, Ste elected offlelels, off leers, employees end agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that {1) the insurer waives the right of eubrogat ion against City and Clty'e elected officiate, po I off LCere, employees and agents; (2) the policies are primary and non-contrlbut Lng with any insurance ihat may be carried Dy city; and (3) tl;ey cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days notice by the insurer to City by certiftetl mall. Counsel shall fu rn ieh City with copies of all each pollc lee promptly upon receipt thereof, or rest if icatee evidencing such insurance. 58CTI ON 8. Counsel shall defend, indemnify and save harmless City, its elected and appointed oEf iclal e, off leers, agents antl employees, from all llabll lty from lose, damage or injury to persona or property, Lnc ludi ng the payment by Couneel of any and all legal costa and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or Lntant ionel or wilful acts . or omissions of Counsel in the performance of Chia Agreements includ- tn9, but not llmiied to, ell coneequantial damage, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 56CTION 9. No assignment of this Agreement or of any pare or obllgat ion of perfor- mance hereunder shall be made, either Ln whole or Ln part, by Couneel without the Prior written consent of Clty. 96CTION 30. The part lea hereto agree that Couneel and its employees, offtcera and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be coneirued for any purpose to De employees of Clty. 58CTION 11. :'Are Agreement shall be governeo by antl roost rueo rn accoroance wrth the lawn of the state of Cal lfornia. 9ECTION 12. In the event any legal proceeding le Lnet Muted to enforce any term or provision of this agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceed- ing shall be ant it led to recover attorney's Ease and costa from the opposing party in en amount determined by the court to be reasonable. SECTION 13, Th le Agreement eupercedec any and all other agreements, either oral or In writing, between the pestles with respect to Assessment District No. A9-1. Each party to this Agreement ecknowledgee thst no rapruentetlon by any party which Se not embodied sere in nor any other egrsement, statement or promise not con[alnad Ln this Agreement, shell 6a valid and binding. Any modification of this kgraemant shall bs affective only if it is Sn writ Lng signed Dy ell part iee. SECTION 14. That this Agreement may be terminated by either party hereto by mailing written notice thereof to the other party. InQJ EXHIBIT "B" PROFESSIONAL SERYICES AGREEMENT This Agreement 1s Wade and entered into this ddy of 19 R9, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY') and NBS/LOwnx (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT'). A. Recitals. (i) CITY has heretofore Issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation pf Assessment Engineering Services for Assessment District No. 89-1 . consisting of approximately 28 parcels between Arrow Route, Rochester Avenue, [he AT65F Railroad main line at an AT65F Railroad sour track west of Milliken /~Drw~wn eM I,~..~a /1~r1 1 ~~~Y ~~• ..... .. (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires t0 retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Coamisslon, City Council and staff 1n the preparation of Protect. (1v) CONSULTANT represents that it 1s qualified W perfona such services and is willing to perform such professionai services as hereinafter defined. NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as foil OwS: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following term, except where the context of this Agreement othen+ise ~~~ requires: (a) Protect: The preparation of services as described fn Exhibit "A" Scope of Services hereto including, but net limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the protect as ou~lined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary t0 be performed by CONSULTANT 1n order to complete the protect. (c) Completion of Protect: The date of completion of ail phases of the protect, including any and all procedutts, development plena, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CDNSULTANT at publle hearings regarding the protect acceptance for construction Ts set forth in Exhibit '8" Proteet Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all t0 the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documents") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in _2_ ~0 Exhibit "A' to CITY within the tine specified in Protect Scheduled, Exhibit "8". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit 'A'. CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT cameents regarding said docuaents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter cake such revisions to said docusents as are deeaa!d necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such fors and in the quantities deterwined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as wy, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreeaw!nt. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon Lhe prior written approval oY GtTY. (d) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense, secure the required issuance of a City Business License as a condition precedent to being engaged as a CONSULTANT within the CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maxlmw sus of S av.ooo ---------- for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sus shall cover the cost of all staff time and act other dtrcct and indirect costs or fees, lnciuding the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "C". .3. l~ t~ O (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C' either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum anaunts far individual tasks. in no event, however, will said invoices exceed 95S of individual task totals described in Exhibits "C". (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay Lo CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95f of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in fona and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, to writing, by CITY, and not included in the Slope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth 1n Exhibit "C". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthiy basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices arc received by CITY. Requested additional services up to an aaaunt not to exceed ten percent (IOS) of the contract amount may 6e authorized by the City Engineer. Additional services exceeding this amount require authorization by the City Council. 4. CITY agrees to Drovlde to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. ID) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other .q_ ~~ infarnatlon, 1f available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary 1n order to complete the protect. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files applicable Lo the protect. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and/or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, modeis, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site Intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The C[TY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses inciuding defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, ar use or reuse at another site by the CITY its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated Dy CITY upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified to said Notice. In the -5- ~~~ event this Agreement 1s so terminated, CONSULTANT shalt be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit 'C', on a pro- rate basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a1, above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and alt notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: SSS~-r4=1c~'~,r„oea wuaui~eu~ - wi~im,u ... uuo~. wo.... Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have Deen received by the addressee forty-eight (481 hours after deposit thereof Tn the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence worK under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and _6_ 40 ~~ maintain at all tines during the tens of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whoa 1t may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work speciffed herein, Tn accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: 'I m aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to De insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Lode, and I will comply with such provisions before comaencing the performance of Lhe work of this Agreement". (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to De kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual Deneflt of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims end liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT'S activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at Least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.00) for property damage. _7. ~ l (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ("malpractice") providing protection of at least 8i.50o,000-------------------------------- for errors and omissions ("malpractice') with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall 6e carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and Ib) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. A11 policies shalt contain language, to the extent obtainable, to Lhe effect that (11 the insurer valves the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (31 they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of ail such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance, CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9, Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or indury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, to any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this -a- (Q (3 Agreement, including, but not limited to, ail consequential damages, to the maximum extent penitted by law. 30. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be awde, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are Independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. 6overning law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in aceordanee with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any ten or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover atLOrrKys' fees and costs from the opposing party to an amount detenlned by the Court W be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and alt other agreements, either oral or to writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement aeknowledges that no representation by any party which 1s not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and bindfng. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. -g- ~L~ IN NITNESS NHEREOf, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOJI Oate: Date: enn s u yor RECOMMENDED FOR APVROYAL usse gu re City Engineer Date: ATTEST: every u e y e Approved as to fors: y orney ~` EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SERVICES NO. 69-1 The following paragraphs are intended to encompass duties and responsibilities o£ the "Engineer of Work" and the "Assessment Engineer," as such terms are customarily used in proceedings under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. In addition, Consultant shall be responsible for providing public information with regard to the Assessment District for City. Consultant shall perform work necessary to assist the City in processing the Assessment District. The work shall include, but not be limited to, the following as directed by the City: a. Mapping - Prepare maps (boundary maps, map of improvements and assessment diagrams) and related documents required under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. b. Monitor Construction Contract Procurement and Award - Review all payment demands as presented by owners, for the acquisition of public facilities by the City. Review shall consist of eligibility for acquisition pursuant to codes and acquisition agreements and the reasonableness of the cost. c. Cost/Improvement Analyses - Prepare a detailed analysis of information for acquisition of improvements and file a report on the recommended acquisition cost for said facilities to be acquired by the City. d. Engineer's Report - Prepare the Engineer's Report required by the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. e. Property Listings - Prepare, and keep current, the following lists for all properties: ° A mailing list of the record owners of all parcels within Assessment District including assessment number and the assessor's parcel number, legal description, mailing address of owner, value of land and improvement, and amount of assessment. ° An alphabetical list of the record owners of all parcels within Assessment District. f. Printin and Mailin of Notices - In connection with forma ear ngs to be he , arrange for printing and mailing of notices prepared by the bond counsel. Prepare and arrange for printing and mailing general information materiel ~/ to all property owners in accordance with the legal time schedule. Arrange for printing of hearing and posted notices and posting as required by said Act. Remove posted notices promptly after hearings. g. Assessment S read - Review alternative criteria or methods o assessment for the individual parcels of land. Hold meetings with the City staff, affected land owners, bond counsel, and financial consultant on a periodic basis for review and testing of assessment criteria. h. Bond Sale Information - Provide information neces- sary for the bond counsel and financial consultant, including but not limited to: information for bond opinion; informa- tion to be included in an official statement to be issued by the City to bond purchasers, including information contained in the Engineer's Report; and general information and data regarding the Assessment District. i. Informal Meetings - Attend team and informal meetings held for the purpose of disseminating information to the public. Prior to such meetings, prepare and assemble information for purposes of making a complete and factual presentation. Prepare sufficient copies of written information for public distribution. j. Formal Hearings (1)- - Attend all hearings held under said Act, fully prepared to present necessary testimony and to respond to public comments. Prior to the Hearing, prepare a booklet for each member of the City Council and each staff member consisting of a urooosed agenda. Engineer's Report, summary of construction bids and actual costs, tabulation of final assessment on each parcel of land, alphabetical list of ownership, and general information. Prior to conclusion of the hearing, tabulate all protests and file a written summary thereof with the City Clerk. k. Filin Assessment Documents - After the final hearing for t o ormation o t o Assessment District, file the assessment diagram, roll and notice of assessment with the appropriate public officials, such as the City Clerk, Superintendent of Streets, County Recorder, County Surveyor, Treasurer or Paying Agent, and other City and County Officials. .. Final Assessment Notices - Prepare final assessment notices and arrange for mailing said notices to property owners, as requested and confirmed by the City Council at the hearing. m. Un aid Assessment List and Bonds - After expiration of the cash collection perio prepare a paid and unpaid list of assessments. n. Treasurer's Report - Assist in the preparation of a Treasurer's Report of unpaid assessments. ~~/ EXHIBIT "B" PROJECT SCHEDULE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-1 weeks After Task Per Exhibit "A" Notice to Proceed a. Diapping - 1st Draft 2 b. Monitor Constzuction Contract Award c. Cost/Improvement Analyses 2 d. Encineer's Report e. Property Listings 3 f. Printing 6 Mailing of Notices ** g. Assessment Spread 8 h. Bond Sale Information ** i. Informal Meetings with Team and Land Owners ** j. Formal Hearings 111 ** k. Filing Assessment Notices ** 1. Final Assessment Notices 1 week after District is confi rmed m. Unpaid Assessment List 5 weeks after (1) above n. Treasurer's Report 5 weeks after (1) above * Depends on Developers Schedule •' Depends cn Apprcved Project Schedule (Q / U EXHIBIT "C" PAYMENT SCHEDULE Task Per Exhibit "A" a. Mapping b. Monitor Construction Contract c. Cost/Improvement Analyses d. Engineer's Report e. Property Listing f. Printing 6 Mailing Notices g. Assessment Spread h. Bond Sale Information i. Informal Meetings j. Formal Nearing (11 k. Filing Assessment Notices i. ~ iuai .-.~:.CoumGn. ..J .~CC~ m. Unpaid Assessment List n. Treasurer's Report SUBTOTAL LABOR Expenses (mileage, postage, prints, tapes) TOTAL W 1 5 Fee-Labor $ 2,859 13,299 1,662 3,853 582 3,078 11,253 761 4,245 1,170 499 coy 697 697 $ 45,352 $ 3,648 $ 49,000 FIMF c'1 '~'+ 11~`? EIELCt Fi;l F~9_i~FF EI(FIIBIT "C" PROFESSIONAL SEAVICfiS ACREEhIENT P. This Agreement is made and entered into this day o[ . 19~ between the City oC Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to a "CITY") and Fieidmaa, Ro000 & Auociatea (hereinafter referred to a "CONSULTANT"). A. Recitsls (q CITY has heretofore issued a request for proposal Dertaining to the performance of professional services with respect to the proposed Milliken infrastructure fiaaacing project ("Project") hereafter, (ii) CITY desiros to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, C1TY's Planning Commiasitn, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iii) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform loch services and is willing to perform such DroCessioaai urvite! sa hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT u follows; B. AgtLCmtat 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: (a) Pr°iect: The providing of finanelll advisory services described in Exhibit "A" Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the DraDaration of reports end documents, the presentation, both oral qnd in writing, o[ such reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work teaaione, Dublic hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project a outlined is the Scope of Services. (b) SLLY14L1 Such professional services as are necessary [o be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project. ~~ r~+F ~l 'O? 12~C*J ~IELLt hilt = ~:;FF P. 3 (Ci Completion of Proieet: 76e deft of completion of all Dhaaof Of the project, including any and ail technical reDOrts, meetings, oral Dresentatiom end attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit "B" Project Schedule sttached hereto, 2. CONSLLTANT agrees as Pollows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake end comDiete the projcct in accordance with Exh(bit "A" and aDDlicable with Federal, State and C[TY statutes, reeulatioos, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) CONSULTANT shall auDDly copies of all reDOrts and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as "documenta") including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY. Copies of the documenta shell be in such numbers as are required by Exhibie "A". CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said douuments and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make each revisions to acid documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shill receive reviud documents in such form nod in the quaatltiea determined necoanry by CITY. The time limits wet forth purauaot tc this Section B2.(b) may be extended uDoo a written approvd of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with she terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persoge are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTAN7 hereby warrants that such persona shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder, CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. (d) CONSULTANT shalt, et CONSULTANT'a sole tort and expense, secure the required issuance of a City Business Liceoae as a condition Dreeedant to being engaged as a CONSULTANT with the CITY. 3. CITY agrees as fnllowa; (a) To pay CONSULTANT n maximum sum Of 321,300 for the performance of the services required hersunder, This sum shall cover the colt of sll staff time and all other direct and indirect costr or fees, including the work of employees, Consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall 6e made io accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B". 6-12 PM1iF' 21 '8'? 12~C1 FIELDPIAII F•'. ~F' F.a (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in sccordaece with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within s reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "B' Dither with respect to hourly' rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks, In no eveot, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Exhibits "B", (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event shell CITY be requited to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of 95% of the maximum Dayable~hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with atl suDDlemental technics! documents, as described herein acceptable In form and content to CITY. Final DaYment shall be made not later then 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance [hereof by CITY. (d) Additional services: Payments Cor additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, end not included in the Scope of Services es set forth in Exhibit "A' hereof, shall be paid on a re(mbursemeat basis in aecordanCe with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C". Charges for additionU services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis •nd shah be paid by CItY within a « asonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. Requested additional services up to an amount not to exceed ten Dercant (10%) of the contract amoune may be authorized by the Director of Resource Services. Additional services exceeding this amount require authorization by the Ciey Council. 4. IO TY ag•••~ to provide to CONSULTANT: (e) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if availabic, which CONSULTANT Considers necessary in order to complete the Drojeot. (c) Such information as is generally available from CITY files appliCablc l0 the project (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other govcrnmcntal agencies end/or private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT'S responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. 5. 4gnerlhip of Dncnmenn: All documents, data, studies and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of C[TY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documenn and other Identified material6 shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make ^nd retain such Copies of said documents and meterieU a CONSULTANT may desire. ~ a~- IIHF El 'E~a lE~f~l FIELDI ItiN ~'~4_~FF F.' 6. Termination: This agreement may he terminated by C[TY upon giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at lease fifteen (IS) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so germinated, CONSULTANT shalt be compensared el CONSULTANT'S applicable hourly rates as sal forth in Exhibit "B", to the date of termination. In ao event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a) above. CONSULTANT shell provide t0 CITY any and ell documents, data, studies and reports, whether is draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate thin Agreement except for cause. 7, Notices end Designated Renresentatives~ Any find ell notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hera[o shall be addrassed as ae[ forth in this paragraph 7, The below named indlvlduals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance Dy the parties under this Agreement: For the CITY; Jerry B, Fuilwood, Director of Resource Services For the CONSULTANT: Lawrence G. Rolapp President Any such notices, demands, invoicas and written communications, by mall, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forth eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid end properly addressed as set forth. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under thin Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable tv CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until ell insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained, CONSULTANT shall take out end maintain st ell Limas during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Comoemadon Insurance: Bafore beginning work, CONSULTANT shell furnish to CITY a sertifioate of insurance es proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all peraens whom it may employ urrectly or through subcantrecton in carrying out the work specifieQ herein, in accordance with the lawn of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of Calffornie Labor Code 9eetion 3700, every employer shall secure the DaYment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to ccmmeneing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certi[icatlon as follows: ~a3 19i,F' Zl '%~? 1G~02 EIELLI6A1 F~~LPF'P F,.' "2 am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake salt insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions bei ore commencing the performance of tfie work of this Agreement", (b) Puhlie Lhbility and Property Dameae: Throughout the term of this Agreement, et CONSULTANT'S sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY end CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad torm, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for DersOnat injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT'r activities, providing protection of et least One Million Dollars (5 1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) C:enenl Insurance Reouiremenh; All imaranee required by express provision Of thG Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in tho Slato of California and policies required under peragnphS g.(a) and (b) ahUl name as additional insureds CITY, in elected officials, offkero, employees, end agents. All policies shalt contain Isnguage, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITV end CITY'S elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or meterislly changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnith CITY with copies of ell such Dolicics promptly upon receipt of them, or certiticale evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and rave harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persona or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorney'r fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, ell consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law, ~~ PF8 ~l 'R'? 1~:0's FIEICi~BAI Pro wPF p, 10. Aasianment: No tuignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior wriaen comsat of CITY. I1, tndeoendmt Contractor: The partite hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employes, offices and agents are independent contraetore under Chia Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be emDloyeea of CITY. The parties hereto also acknowledge that CONSULTANT [hall not ba squired to perform any urviea which constitute the practice of law, 12. Governiea Gw~ This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of C[lifornia. 13. Attorney's Fees: la the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party io said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and ewta from the oppwlag party is an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 11. Entire A^reemenn Thia Agreement auDereedea any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, ftatement, or promise not contained in chit Agreement shUl 6e valid and binding. Any modlficufon of this Agreement shall be effective only if It is in writing signed by all partis. ~~~ INF ~1 's9 1~~Oa PIELCd~WI F~:~LiF'P F,$ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Ayreemeo[ as of the day end year fiat set forth above: CONSULTANT- C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Jerry Fullwood Director of Resource Services ATTE$7: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk mktQ\f:rnchcuea Date: Dsle: Dste: Approved as to form: City Attorney ~~ hF'F c'1 '3'? 1:~Oa FIELPPhill F!I i~PP 6IIII~IT A P.? ~a~ PIFF 21 "?'? Ic: ES FIELCt IqI~ F!n RFF F. 10 We agree to provide financial sdvisory services in connection with any and all Agency Financing requirements a they pertain to the Project, f7:.lxi:lfl I, Pnllminarv Surrey. We will confer with your staff, bond counsel snd consulting engineer for the purpose of making a Draliminary survey of the Project end to aasiat in the formulation of a coordinated plan to finance the Project. II. Attendanea at pu¢Iic hteellaaa/W'nrkrhem. We will attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, ba available to meet with the effected D*opertY owner(s) eo explain the effects Of any proposed financing. III. Conmltalloea/Adrlea, We will be available for consultation end advice on the Project as necessary. IV. Work SeaJom and 6eminara. We will be available to conduct end/or participate in work sessions and seminars which may be hold to discuss the project end methods of Dublic finandns V, Pu61ie ssearlna, We will attend all public hearings required and shall participate in Such hearings to the extent deemed necessary. PHAS& II: We will perform the following additional services in conjunction with the marketing of Bonds, 1, hluelcloal Bend Markah Furnish the City with intormetion concerning current municipal Bend market conditions and make reeammendatiem as to the technical detaib of the financing, includin8 maturity tehedulen, funds, wvenanta, redemption features, and other details which wilt, in our opinion, make the proposed financing most acceptable to prospective purchasers and, therefore, marketable at the lowest possible interest rte. IL 13eeotlatad Sale/Comnelltira Sde ~a~ PI1l+ ~l 'b? Ic'~~~ FIFLCd~l:Il F~'d .i,F'P F,11 At the direction oC the City, either ncgotiete a isle of the contemplated Bonds to assist the City in calling for competitive bide. A. Ciatasititd Sde. If it Is determined to sell the Honds by negotiated ea1e, we wilt: t. Seiecu++ ut u+derwrlt.r.. Aaaist the City in the selection of e qualified underwriter whose reputation, Financial strength, and experience will best serve the Sateresb of the City and affected property owner(s). 2. Lons+lutlen/Adrlee. Attend say meetings concerning the Project when deemed accessary and, in addition, bo available for consultation and advice until such time a the Beads to finance the improvement for the City have been sold, and thereafter uDoa request. 3, Neaotlafed 9^la of Beud. Assist the City in negotiating the sale of the contemplated Bands to the underwriter selected pursuant to sub- paragnph A,1 above, and make approDrlate rewmmendations to the City. 4, Fleaeclal Rar6w of Dac+mest. Review the financial slpeCt Of ali documents relating to the marketing of the proposed Beads including any Underwriter Disclosure Document. S Our Dlllunrr alr.llna If „ dur dil l+nnce meerim it helA we will participate in such due diligence meeting and assl~t the City in the eaaminnion of pertinent financial dna. 6. M+Itylg.g.l.g(,$eeurlty Rertew. In the event the suthorfzed Honds are sold In more than one sale, we will review the financial tetm7 and conditions of etch offering to determine to what talent, iT any, the security of esch series of Honds is impacted. 7, Multleb Sdaa/Sarrln to 6a Prerlded. In the event thtt the authorized Bonds pre sold in more than one sale, we will Drovlde services for each series of Honds is accordance with sub-plfagraphs A.1, A.1, A.3, A.4, and A.3. B. Salad Cemeatltln Blda. If It is determined to fell the Bonds at sealed eompetltive bid, we will perform the followint services: ~~9 PbiF c'1 'B? 1c C>; FIELCd KtlI F'^I i.F'F P, lc 1, Dlaale^nra Dnanmeat. Accumulate and compile into a Disclosure Document economic, financial, and atatiatical data pertaining to the proposed financing, which Disclosure Document shall be satisfactory to you. The Disclosure Docnmeat will Snclude the official Notice of Sele. 2. Aue Dlllaaeea MoOnna. Prior to the production end distribution of any Diacloaure Document, the City agrees to hold a due diligence meeting to verify the accuracy of the data contained in the Dtacloaure Document and make full diaolmnre oC all pertinent information concerning the economy and finaesee of the City, We will participate in ouch due diligence meeting and assist you in the examination of pertinent fimncitl data. 3, j',tpductlon of Dlaclemr. Deanmaet. Under the auDervi7ion of the C1ty, cause to Droduce said Disclosure Document. G. Diatributlon et Ot(iclal Statement. Distribute copies oC the Disclosure Document to known Underwriters of municipal securities. S. tJadatlne et Dhcioaon Deeumeat, In the event the authorized financing is fold in more than one sale, we wiu update and distribute copies of the revised Disclosure Document 1e ecwrdanee with sub-Dangnphs B,1„ 8.2„ B,3., and B,l, above. 6. S',oe^ultatlon/Advice. Attend any mectings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, In addition, be available for consultation and advlw until ouch time es the Bonds to finance the Prnir~f h. vw h.rn rn1A nnA rherrr frnr noon rrnnref. 7, Contact of Henri Vndararltera. Make direct contact with a select number of Bond Underwriters in en effort to stimulate bidding on the Bonds. g. IHE BOND BUYER Ad. Place nn advertisement in THE BOND BUYER announcing the offering of the Bond issue Drier to the time bids are received For such issue. 9. Attendance •t Bond Salas. Attend meetings of the City at which bids for Bonds era received for the purpose of assisting in the computation and evaluation of such bids. III. Bond Ratlnn. If deemed desire ble, work whh «cognized rating service(s) in sn attempt to obtain an advantageous Wring of the Bonds to be issued. IV, lgautggab If deemed desirable, we will asalst the City in obtaining on Insurance policy providing for guaranteed payment of Drincipd and interest on the Bonda. ~ 3d P4'P 31 '69 1c:OP FIELCtAill F+~.iff P.13 V, Attaadana at Bead Clealea We will compute elostng figures, lneluding accrued interact, and aplat Bond Counsel In the coordination of evens of tha elaing. If a competitive Boyd salt is conducted, the City agrees to Puraish the suceasful bidder, at the claing, a certlflcate, signed by the appropriate officiela of the City, acting in their offieltl apathy, to the effect that to the best of their knowledge and belief, and after reasonable Investigation, a) neither the Disclosure Document aor any amendmeet or supplement thereto connln! any untrue statement of a materiel fact or omits to shte any. material fact necessary to order to make the statements therein, in light of the circutmtances in which they were made, cot misleading; b) aina the date of the Dlaclocure Docnmeat, no event ha! occurred which should have been set forth in such an amendmeat or auDDlement; not c) has there been coy materiel adverse chaage is the operation or ftnanciai affairs o[ the City since the date of such Diaclaanre Document. Vi. Tahla of Dahl Sardce. After she Bonds have been delivered, we will prepare and furnish the City a Table of Debt Service which will set forth actual semiannual and annual payments of principal and Interest due on the Bonds. PHASE III After the Bonds have baea delivered we will prepare agd furnish the fNv with ~ Drn~rAnr~ aa~mul 1n hr urwA fn u~i,1 in Mrs aAminiafn Nnn of the District and the servicing of the Bonds. The preparation of this INanual shall be coordinated with staff sad dfected deparemenn. we will be evaiisble for consultation sad advice to the City to assist City Staff in the adminlslration of the District and the servicing of the Bondi. ~ 3/ __ cl 1.• •wl P«wc~' F.la •I~ZDIT Y hb?F: c'1 'l33 120" FCEI.Cd-li{1 Fpl_iRF P. 15 Fees for services rendered under Phase i will be billed at our standard hourly ralea in effect at the lime such rervices are provided ;provided, however, Ihpt the maximum fee to be paid under Phase 1 shall not exceed 57,500 (See Schedule 'A", attached hereto, for schedule of current hourly rates.) For all services to be rendered under Phase II resulting in the rate of Bonds hereunder, the City will pay us 514,000 for each series of Bonds. Fees for services rendered under Pharr: III will be billed at our standard hourly rater in effect at the time such aervicer are Drov)ded. In the even[ the Project is abandoned after Phare I but prior to the completion of financing, the City aB*eer to pay us a tee equal to the reasonable value of services rendered for Phase II. Reasonable value for our aervicn shall be determined by using our current hourly rates to effect at the time of aooh abandonment, plus relmburoemene for usual and customary out•of•poeket expenses. Attached hereto is Schedule "A" of our hourly rates in effect as of the date of Chia Agreement. The City will reimburse us for usual and customary out•of•pocket expense, including, but not limited to, the cost of producing and distributing or updating the Disclosure Documeat, costs of financial advertising anQ Costa Incurred In tonnectlon with travel outside of Southern California, if such travel is oecepary in the furtherance of the Project and is authorized by the City. Fees based on hourly rates shall be due and payable monthly. Any retention shat) be paid at closing or upon abandonment on eanceliatlon Payment for all service rendered and expenses incurred pursuant to Phue II of this Agreement shall be pa. et the closing. In the event of abandonment of the Project, abandonment fees shall be due and payable immediately after such abandonment, SEBIy$ This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the financing contemplated herein has been completed or the Project is abandoned, whichever first occurs. it is expressly undrrarood that [his Agreement does not intend to and it not under any circumstances to be construed as requlring us to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; we ere employed in an expert financial sdviaory capacity only. (n 3 3 nY1plNIgK d i i *LH ~ ~ . N.: v. ,111 H G411W M erln toYr ~^ 4n. M. G1'.Nnn,~, Vrl~l plu 11.E 0 M•rch 17. 1989 W. Laureate C. Relepp YteNmia. Re:app tr Aarxletei zla9 s 6. Male sues lrvlne, Callfarnla 9711 ReterenGl AieeeemMt blatrlet Vo. 89-a Re6eha Cucamaote. CaLLto[nle Dwr Mr. Rol•pp~ ~; hle Utter is to •erva ao a Vuole for turnLhLls en eppreieel report coventttr the pacers comp[te16( the ebOra-rotetenCe0 protect N Rmcllo Cueeman;e, Celltornle. Our fN for Pn~~L [JaM COpltl OP a nerretly! eDDtaliel [sport b !6,000. The report wlll ~g1te1D M Oplalo• d ralo• for a•Ce of th• p•rGli of lend Cemprlila({ the Ai••pm•nt Dlittlcl, et•umintr crompietlon of the Aeeeeimeltt DU[rict improvements. R you requtre eddltioe•1 lotorm•tlon pl••i• eantect me. Slac•raly, LATIDAU6R A~CIATB$ MC. 6 Di..,ctor C R9J:6ew /TiTi) AC D A \Tli VA !.T iA A 1lAl.T/. A ,. STAFF REPORT ~~'~ ~' ~ A H;~ 2 U' ~ 9 1977 ~ Date: May 17, 1989 To: Mayor, Members of City Council, and City Manager From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager Subject: Central Park At the last City Council meeting, Council asked that Central Park Design Development ba on the agenda for an item oP discussion. As you know Central Park Design Development stage was placed on hold shortly after the second phase RFP's were delivered to potential Architects. Tha delay was to allow time to perform a Recreation Neade Assessment of the =ommunity. As a result of the Aaeassmant, etatt hoe identified numerous school sites that can ba renovated/improved to allow sport programing to takn place on school district property. You have received memo's regarding updates on this progress and in the near future Community 9arvices Department will be evrinaH nrt nnah *n Aoai rtn ranrw>,f~i nn /imnrnvomonta n4 Fti wa nda High School, Cucamonga Elementary, Rancho Cucamonga Jr. High, and Cucamonga Jr. High. These school sites have bean identified as offering the possibility of redesign of existing athletic facilities and the possibility of lighting their play fields to allow programing to continua after sunset without disturbing the neighborhoods with lighted facilities. Additionally, progress towards purchase oP land for Northeast Community Park and the Sport Complex Park in the industrial area era moving forward. Both facilities will go a long way towards meeting the community needs for sports facilities. Based on this, staffs recommendation is that City Council direct stafY to proceed with the Design Development of Central Park and authorize the Community Services Department to receive Requests for Proposals to complete the next phase Design Development. JS:bs ~3S uiri vr-n~unvuuue+mvNUa MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17. 1989 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Co~ndi FROM: Jack Lam. AICP, Clty Manager \ , BUBJECT: Discussion on eatabHahing transition Task Force for Implementation of subsidiary Fire District. At the ]omt meeting between the City Coundl and the Fire DiaMct Hoard, diacusafon was raised as to how to transition the implementatton of the subsidiary district. At the most recent City coundl meeting it was requested that this item be placed on the agenda so that the merits of establishing a Task Force could be discussed. 'lhe purpose of this Task Force, as e~teased by the City Countll, would be to insure that the operations of both the subsidiary dlalrict and the City through the transition time would be as compatible and complementary as possible. l0 3~ nrmv nm n ~ vrnn~ n STAFF REPORT v ~~'`~~~~ ` ~~_ ril i, ~ I'ip J': Iii GATE: May 8, 1989 T0: Mayor Stout and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Administrative Aide SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO THE FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS lteco~endation• It is recommended that the City Council approve the aDDoi ntment of William Purkiss to the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. Background• When the Foundation was originally formed by the City Council in April 1987, it was to be comprised of a seven member Board of Directors. Due to the resignation of Steve Sensenbach from the Board, there is now a vacancy. w~aiyaia- Mr. Purkiss has been an active member on both the Program and Facilities Committees to the Foundation. His background in both the visual and performing arts and his position as Dean of Instruction at Chaffey College, make him an ideal candidate for a position on the Board. Mr. Purki55 has the unanimous approval of the Board of Directors of the Foundation to fill the vacancy. cc. Jack Lam Linda Daniels Jerry Fulwood X37 ~^ :~ d~. May 15, 1989 nEC~ir~n cm of w-ncno cucAro~a ADMINISTRATION The Hon. Mayor Dennis Stout MAY 161989 and Council Members of Rancho Cucamonga ~~UI~ l! Dear Council Members: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the park proposed for the Red Mill area. As a member of the community redesign committee I would like to mention two points of consideration. In our meetings with Dave Leonard and Pam Ledbetter, we listed "modified security lighting" as our number one priority. We were concerned with providing sufficient security lighting for the park area while protecting local homes against further incursions by overly bright and diffused lights. Although highest on our initial priority list, I have peen tote since that the same Irgntrng the city uses in parks elsewhere would simply be standard issue. Is it not possible to provide a more focused lighting like "shoebox" or ground lighting so as to minimize further problems with excessive light spread? My second concern has to do with the naming of the proposed park site. The residents committee recommended something with local historical flavor (Tapia Park, Tiburc io Tapia Parklor something with the name "Red "riili" included. In all references and correspondence regarding the park so far, the name "Creekside" continues to be used. Further, I understand that at the last meeting on this subject either the City Council or the Parks Commission came up with another suggestion that seems to ignore the residents committee recommendations ~;': _# ~~, `-~ ., Nay 15, 1989 Page 2 altogether. The name, "Alta Vista Park" fails to acknowledge the strong historical significance of the Red Hill area and trivializes the distinctiveness of the region by merely coupling adjoingb street names, Alta Cuesta and Valle Vista. Whatever the park name ends up being, the community redesign committee strongly opposed the name "Creekside" because of it's shallow similarity to the kind of names used in recent housing tract developments. As a member of the residents committee I would hope for a name that would more closely reflect our original goals of regional and historical distinction. I think that some reference to Tiburcio Tapia (Red Hill's and Rancho Cucamonga's original resident)or to the original rancho homesite or its local legends would be most appropriate. If additional suggestions are still wanted, may I offer the following as attempts to capture some local flavor. 1. Red Hill Legends Park, or, Legends Park(referr ing to the myths and mysterys of Red Hill and its distinctive legend s~. 2. Lost Gold Park, or, "E1 Oro Perdido" Park. The allusion is to Tapia's lost gold, one of Red Hill's(and Rancho Cucamonga's most historic legend s~. 3. Rancho Cucamonga Park, or, "Casa de Rancho Cucamonga" Park(Red Hill was the original site and focal point of the Renchol. 4. Red Hill Rancho Parklthe Rancho was on Red Hill) 5. Red Hill Neighborhood Parklthat's basically what it is!). May 15, 1989 Page 3 Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of these matters. Speaking as a member of the community redesign committee I was very pleased at the changes and enhancements that were developed with regard to the proposed park's planning. The site on Red Hill is long overdue for some beautification. I believe the redesigned park plan will be a welcome addition to the community and to the neighborhood in particular. I look forward to its implementation. Si cerely• Tom 3 Subt 8480 Camino Sur, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (7141982-0173/982-6077 •5